The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit DR-10-76 - SEGALE - BUILDING 763 DESIGN REVIEWdr-10-76 18150 segale park drive b 18350 segale park drive b segale project 763 J .• . DR-1-76 McCann Project #300 2.- 5ma 1/7 L 350E g-71 • 1 550 ‘iki Page 3 • 3 351W 344E 334W 7 3 - 11 - V 74-7-v" - F . OTHER BUSINESS DESIGN REVIEW Planning Commission Page 6 Minutes 23 September 1976 Mr. Link referred to notes of a Planning Commission work meeting conducted 28 March 1972 and noted the several criteria used to evaluate 10 different sites. Most of the Commission's criteria were echoed in those used recently by the architects for this site. Pointed out that the Commission's rating in 1972 placed the subject site in the lower half of the 10 sites considered. Referring to several newspaper articles and City Council minutes, noted the location of city hall has been dragging ever since the recommendation of the Commission was presented to the Council in February of 1974. Mr. Richards noted that Objective 1 and policies 3 and 4 thereof of the Resi- dence Element of the Comprehensive Plan, which has been reviewed by the Plan- ning Commission and received a formal intention to adopt by the City Council, explicitly discourages the location of such uses in a residential neighbor- hood. In addition, there has been some indication that the subject site is desirable for city hall because it is large enough to support a community center. Yet the 1976 Park Plan, recently reviewed by the Commission and adopted by the City Council, indicates a site far removed from the subject property. The Chief of Police has indicated in a letter included in the EIS that the transportation of law offenders through the residential neighborhood is both undesirable and unnecessary. The EIS identifies several unmitigated impacts and alternatives with lesser impacts. The plans and policies referred to have been created, reviewed, altered and adopted to provide a tool to use in a decision - making process such as this and the Planning Commission, at least, should adhere to them. Based on the conclusions stated above and the findings and conclusions contained in the Staff Report, Mr. Richards moved to deny the rezone. Motion was seconded by Mr. West and carried unanimously. L ,Egier, Segale Business Park Mr. Crutchfield read a letter from Segale Business Park requesting reconsidera- tion of the Commission's stipulation of approval on their Project 763 which related to the screening of roof - mounted equipment. Mr. George Hull, Segale Business Park, stated it was unclear as to whether or not screening is required where roof - mounted equipment cannot be seen from the adjacent roadways. After some discussion regarding the intent of this particular restriction, it was concluded that it was intended to require screening of roof - mounted equipment where it otherwise would be visible to a person of average height from the oppo- site side of adjacent streets. SEGALE BUS /NESS PARK September 15, 1976 Tukwila Planning Commission c/o Mr. Gary Crutchfield Office of Community Development City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Subject: Planning Commission Approval of Project 763 Dear Gary: Thank you for your letter of August 31, 1976 noting the Planning Commission's approval of our Project 763. In your letter you also noted three stipulations to that approval. The first such stipulation suggests that screening of roof - mounted equipment will be required before occupancy permit issuance. We wish the Planning Commission to reconsider this stipulation. Roof screening has not been required on any of our previous buildings. For this and other reasons, we respectfully request the Planning Commission to reconsider this stipulation at their next meeting. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, SEGALE BUSINESS PARK ct- George L. Hull, Jr. Controller GLH : sb P.O. BOX 88050 • TELEPHONE: (206) 226.3202 • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 88188 • 31 August 1976 Dear Bruce: Sincer ,ly, f, Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bruce Solly Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88924 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Gay Crutcfifield Assistant Planner GC /cw cc: Al Pieper, Bldg Div The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular meeting conducted 26 August 1976, reviewed the site plan and elevation drawings for your project #763. The Commission approved the plans with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of exterior architectural streatment, including screening of roof - mounted equipment, prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 2. Approval of "interior" landscape plan to include effective "break- up" points along the west elevation, prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 3. Exterior landscape conform to Master Landscape Plan previously approved by the Commission. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 242 -2177. 26 August 1976 AGENDA ITEM VII B : CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Site Plan - Segale Project #763 8 :00 P.M. Segale Business Park has proposed construction of a mammoth warehouse nearly 1500 feet in length (over 4 mile) and containing more than 300,000 square feet of gross floor area. The plans submitted appear to be in the spirit promoted by Chapter 18.32 and adequate parking and truck maneuvering space is provided. The extreme length of the building, however, presents an overwhelming visual effect which can be. enhanced through the inclusion of landscape "break -up" points along the west elevation. Staff recommends the Commission approve the proposed building subject to the following stipulations: 1. Approval of exterior architectural treatment, including screening of roof- mounted equipment, prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 2. Approval of "interior" landscape plans to include effective "break -up" points along the west elevation, prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. 3. Exterior landscape conform to Master Landscape Plan previously approved by the Commission. • te6N-C pgocc '1(03 - 16=10 I - 1%3O S PK PIC !/ 0 IN : TOrA .6w • E LEV AT [Q FA__ • ScAt. E 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 • •. „TOP or 12GCF 7E1,4; F • l'itfri I I illii 2 .• 5 6 7 8: ILEX iIJLE 110LER•3021- OE 6Z Be CZ 9?, SZ r/Z CZ ZZ tZ OZ St Ot LI Srt St VI 'El ZI II 01. „„11 • IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT N T — • p I a." TIzu r - 1=:•00FC'S• E. E V 4e, vs/ STiz—E.E. .7 .5GA1-e. . ArrX, T14 GO 7"; PAII•4 • " . , „ - 41 Allin...M111 ...: ' .Vigt VM •_ • • - 4 — C. E • , • ,-5 • 1 !!! 1 ,, • , L C) L 0 le VIM INCH 1 • a4 4X:r X I IV" TT6 VC le- CDC:C:424'S 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER • J02 AW soir OC 6Z Od LY 9Z GZ CZ EZ I oe 61 13I LI 91 SI 01 'El Z1 II 0 . „ SC.NI: 24.'2 t' fri 8: /444:70/14 •Ces4.1= I /417.4l4ITEGYIJI4 TWATIJIL0.1:7 - caw F1441.4:04 5C.7=7 IF THIS ' CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO ! THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT • i - Ata.605. .= • ''.',.;•.5/ . . IA:A.0-1r) zg A a.: • . . • F-2 — _53'•;•P' s j • •;.1 ■••;1=4 "#: 4::•FFr=m. ( I b - :.717.1114:1:A4-.1.7r • e 0 . :• • (1150 5S PK • 1-4•77 • ': • e:FF 404,- s 11114/. • "G" • ,WARAB1400t.lie ;LIS: " . : . • ; • SYTy . 6 1 ("Vs : • • • • .• ". • 177.g 0.• • PAI 4 a g a.4.• • ' ,cr_vict G. : w isz r a wusge;._ C2IC - e A•ox THOMAS A. SCONZO ,, F32 I D NORTHRUP 4vAr/4 . D11905/266 64 I -1:15o . :. . . . . . . . ... , , , . „ iq (3701?.. PL:tnr. OFICW9 1-0-1E .1" i f • 4s. 0 c.../ P 12, 14. S 0 U I' 1 C., 0.1•4. T TM. P CT* VE. lea • • 1°1 -".• R. K. %vs, SITE PLAN • o 101113 11.11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OE L 9 73 CZ ZZ 1Z OZ GI Ell LI 91 SI 71 'CI ZI U OL 6Z 8L Z Z SE ili111111111011111,1111111611 . 1 , 111 , 11,11.1110 1 , 11 11,4 111 1,N11, 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 111101 11 1t11 1 11 1 [0 111 11J I OIMIII II III I II II I III II IIIIII ti l d 1111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111,111111 = ELEX 113LE R ULER -302 AWa•nm•N•— CR I MAC. K - 5c4sLE. I" - 4 coc4ce • PIZOJ aCT 762 ISISO-V050seofra IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS . THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT : ' • PARK • THOMAS A. SCONZO 132, 9 NORTHRUP WAY/R210/BELLEVUE. WA 98005/206041.3B50 1 * *5 SEGALE BUSINESS Vs/A.51 41 to tmummmu - &1..C. 1 ------ 7 7 17711 ri7rM 2 oe 6Z LZ 9Z SZ CZ Nmmenumminmq • . , • Z.1 T' i e'. 3 4 5 6 7 8 V zz z E 61. Ell L.1 91 SI 'Cl Zt Ll Z .„..1 FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW 1$-10-1b4 • 777.477,7:7 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS' CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO , - THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT C.) ---- 771711:14Wi WA.:!aic;,VNITC,;177,t6;11:T: THOMAS A. SCONZO 13219 NORTHRUP IAA V4210/BELLEVUE. AA 914013/206 641.11350