The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L03-036 - GALLIANO MARIO - TREE CLEARINGL03 -036 GALLIANO' S CUCINA TREE CLEARING 14201 INTERURBAN AV S (TEMP) From: "D Ward" <starviewii @hotmail.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/9/04 10:29AM Subject: Galliano cutting more trees Hi Carol, Please keep me informed as to what action the City will take. Thanks SO much, Michele Ricks Thanks for getting back to me. This stand of trees was cut on Sunday morning, around 10:30A. We heard the chain saw, looked out our window, and saw there were trees laying on the ground. We grabbed the camera and went down to take a look. Mario Galliano was cutting ANOTHER tree ON THE HILLSIDE. You can see in the pictures, the 'white mark' they spray painted on the side of the hill. The tree was ABOVE the mark and that's the one he cut down. THIS TREE WAS NOT DISEASED! As a matter of fact, I'm not even sure this tree was his to cut down. My neighbor across the street also witnessed Mario cutting down the trees. PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS! I can't even begin to tell you how much stress Mr. Galliano is causing us. Fast. Reliable. Get MSN 9 Dial -up - 3 months for the price of 1! (Limited -time Offer) http: // click. atdmt. com/ AVE /go /onm00200361ave /direct/01/ X ▪ Z • w O 0 CD 0 (/) W W (J) u_ w 0 CC Lt. < ct I z H O z LU w H W w 0 U. I - 0 Z I-U U) o 1- Z ..• • . •••" • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR 'THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. v. �° 3�' i' ti� ',r.Ft�'e�Sttte�`b'.wA�F`�dt". ids±;? x•:=r' �i?%} ��r '�' asla�itiS:»:i�ub z I • I- re 2 6 JU O 0 (o W • LL W 2 Q . 2 d w z I- O zI- W w U cl O � cI W I- - u'O .. z U = O~ z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. February 3, 2004 Mr. Ken Hilliard Manager, Environmental Services and Compliance 7- Eleven, Inc. 2711 N. Haskell Avenue Dallas, TX 75204 Dear Mr. Hilliard: s: EC0'R BACKGROUND 11VTERIVAlIONAL 1 2C, •.; I .'3•!th Coup INCU1 :r'UR��iFD int• !!) -12E. ;:i:: IoCll.r (I. RECEIVED FEB 0 4 2004 Project #01 EL.27482.03 U) KWILA PUBLIC WORKS Subject: Final Work Plan for Remedial Excavation and Additional Site Assessment Former 7- Eleven Store No. 27482 14201 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington On behalf of 7- Eleven Inc. (7- Eleven), SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR) has prepared the following work plan to conduct a remedial excavation and additional site assessment at the above - referenced site (site, Figure 1). The site was formerly 7- Eleven store number 27482 located at the intersection of South 142 Street and Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). Former 7- Eleven store 27482 terminated operations at this location in 1993. The site is currently being developed as a restaurant and associated parking area. During excavation for subsurface utilities, potentially impacted soil was identified, and several test pits were excavated on September 4, 2003. Several soil samples and one grab groundwater sample were collected from six of the test pits. Based on those results, additional site investigation was necessary to define the nature and extent of the soil and groundwater impacts at the site. SECOR understands that the site owner reported the release to Ecology in September 2003. On December 12, 2003, SECOR supervised the advancement of 10 soil probe locations at the site using a Geoprobe truck - mounted hydraulically driven soil coring system. The soil probes, GP -1 through GP -10 were advanced to evaluate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impacts in soil and groundwater at the site (Figure 2). The soil probes were driven to total depths ranging from 12 feet below ground surface (bgs) to 16 feet bgs, and groundwater entered the probe locations at 8 -feet bgs at seven of the 10 soil probe locations. A total of 23 soil samples were collected during advancement of the soil probes. Samples were typically collected at 4- and 8- feet bgs from each probe location. A total of 10 groundwater samples were collected after collection of soil samples in each of the soil probes. Results of additional site assessment conducted at the site in December 2003 indicate that total petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline -, diesel -, and oil -range (TPH -G, TPH -D, and ::�, •rte ...... ew 0 ct- oo .a65�t�°^r:*:??��.u"^"._-"''" rim^'. oe�.»... vn R„ wrt•.: ,>.,r+.,trn•.�.,t,,.......«,.�. �YS+^,... �;+ c +rrla „�.;'?F,LeC4g:.�.,1�:,;p•, Mr. Ken Hilliard Project No 01 EL.27482.03 February 3, 2004 Page 2 TPH -O, respectively), benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs) are present in soil at the site at concentrations greater than their respective Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) Method A unrestricted use soil cleanup levels (soil CULs). Based on the soil conditions at the site, a decision has been made to conduct a soil removal action to remediate accessible impacted soils, and to initiate the groundwater remediation process. TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, and benzene were detected at concentrations greater than their respective MTCA Method A groundwater cleanup levels (groundwater CULs) in the groundwater samples collected from the soil probes at the site. Because the groundwater samples were collected from temporary soil probes, the true nature and extent of the impacts to groundwater remains to be assessed. Therefore, installation and monitoring of at least four monitoring wells is required to evaluate impacts to groundwater. SCOPE OF SERVICES The SECOR proposed scope of services includes the following: Health and Safety Plan A site specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) will be prepared for the site as part of the project. The HASP identifies potential physical and chemical hazards associated with the proposed field activities and established personnel protection standards and mandatory safety practices. The HASP also includes information on suspected chemical compounds to be encountered, a list of monitoring equipment, the required protective clothing and equipment, a map and directions to the nearest hospital and a list of emergency telephone numbers. The HASP will be available on -site at all times during the field activities. All SECOR personnel and subcontractors working on the site were required to review, sign and comply with the provision set forth in the HASP. Obtain Permits SECOR will obtain a land alteration permit from the City of Tukwila prior to commencement of soil excavation activities. Site conditions include impacted soil in the immediate vicinity of the City of Tukwila sidewalk and underlying sanitary sewer line on the east side of the site and the base of a significant hillslope on the west side of the site. Therefore, a geotechnical evaluation addressing excavation shoring near the sidewalk and setback from the base of the hillslope is required by the City of Tukwila prior to permit application. The geotechnical assessment is attached to this workplan, and this workplan will be submitted to the City of Tukwila along with a permit application. For the monitoring well installation, the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) requires the submission of start cards for each well. Start cards for the site will be filed by the driller after installation of the well. Unless monitoring wells are proposed in the City of Tukwila right -of -way, no other permits are required for installation of monitoring wells. Locate Underground Utilities SECOR will contact Underground Service Alert and meet with utility representatives to mark locations of subsurface utilities. In addition, a private locator will be contracted to assess the RAW P17.11 \27482127482 work plan 1.doc S E C C.. R Mr. Ken Hilliard Project No 01 EL.27482.03 February 3, 2004 Page 3 SECOR excavation area and each potential drilling area and to identify the location of subsurface utilities. Excavate Accessible Impacted Soils SECOR will supervise the excavation of impacted soil identified at the site at the approximate locations and depths illustrated on Figure 3. Excavation of the area and depths indicated on Figure 3 is estimated to result in the removal of approximately 450 cubic yards of impacted soil from the site. However, SECOR will oversee the removal of additional soil as necessary to achieve the remedial objective of compliance with the MTCA Method A soil CULs. SECOR will also conduct the soil excavation activities in accordance with the geotechnical assessment and the land alteration permit approved by the City of Tukwila. Therefore, some inaccessible impacted soil may remain after the remedial excavation at concentrations greater than the MTCA Method A soil CULs. The following tasks are anticipated at the site during the remedial excavation • Based on field- screening techniques including visual and olfactory observation, sheen testing, and organic vapor monitoring using a photoionization detector (PID), excavate TPH- and cPAH- impacted soil with concentrations greater than regulatory action levels from the area shown on Figure 3. Remove additional soil as necessary to achieve compliance with the current MTCA Method A soil CULs within the constraints of the City of Tukwila permit and the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer. • Use shoring methodology recommended by the geotechnical engineering report and required by the City of Tukwila in the vicinity of the sidewalk at the eastern boundary of the site. • Maintain setback from the base of the hillslope at the western boundary of the site as recommended by the geotechnical engineering report and required by the City of Tukwila. • Based on site constraints including the size of the site, size and location of the proposed excavation area, the locations of the building, and the entry locations at the site, it is anticipated that impacted soil will not be stockpiled on site, but will be direct - loaded to trucks for transport to Rabanco's LaFarge facility in Seattle, Washington for soil recycling by thermal desorption. The areas requiring excavation will be determined in the field based on visual and olfactory observations, and by monitoring with an photoionization detector (P ID). • Based on field observations, collect confirmation soil samples at the limits of the excavation, and submit for analysis to the analytical laboratory. If confirmation samples indicate non - compliance with the remedial objective, additional accessible soil will be removed, and a new compliance soil sample will be collected. • Backfill and restore site to pre- excavation condition. • Submit final cleanup report documenting site observations and activities to 7- Eleven, the site owner, and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). R: \WP\7.11\27482\27482 work planl.doc Mr. Ken Hilliard Project No 01 EL.27482.03 February 3, 2004 Page 4 Soil Sampling at the Excavation Limits S E CO R Soil samples will be collected from the limits of the excavation to confirm compliance with MTCA Method A cleanup levels, or to characterize any remaining contamination in areas that are not accessible for excavation (i.e., under sidewalk). Soil samples collected at the site will be field screened using visual observation and sheen testing. In addition, organic vapor monitoring will performed by measuring headspace vapors using a PID. Soil samples will also visually examined and the general soil lithology will be recorded in the field log. Soil samples will be prepared for laboratory analysis by removing the soil from the center of the excavator bucket using a hand trowel or hand auger (where samples are not collected from the excavator bucket) and immediately transferring the soil into 8 -ounce laboratory - supplied glass jars. Each jar will be filled completely with soil to minimize headspace and sealed with a TeflonTM -lined screw cap. Each sample will be uniquely labeled and placed on ice in a cooler for transport to the project laboratory. Each sample label will include a unique sample number that will be mapped on a field site plan, date and time of sampling, SECOR project number, and the Site name. Decontamination of all sampling equipment will occur prior to use, and between each sampling location. All soil sampling equipment will be cleaned with a non - phosphate detergent solution and rinsed with tap water followed by a distilled water rinse to reduce the possibility of cross - contamination between sample locations. Soil samples collected from the excavator bucket will be taken from the center of the bucket (i.e., samples will not be collected from next to the bucket walls) to avoid sample cross - contamination. SECOR anticipates that approximately 20 to 30 soil samples will be submitted for laboratory analysis, depending how much over- excavation is required after the initial round of confirmation sampling. Expedited turnaround time will be requested as necessary to minimize delays in excavation activities. Selected analyses are based on the constituents previously identified at the site. These analytes include TPH in the gasoline, diesel and motor oil ranges and cPAHs. The majority of the confirmation samples will be analyzed only for TPH in the diesel and motor oil ranges using Ecology- approved Method NWTPH -Dx and for gasoline range hydrocarbons and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) using Ecology- approved Method NWTPH -G /BTEX. Depending on the concentrations of oil range hydrocarbons in the samples, selected samples will also be analyzed for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270C /SIM. The samples will be analyzed at OnSite Environmental, Inc. (OSE) of Redmond, Washington. Drill Soil Boreholes and Install and Develop Monitoring Wells SECOR proposes to drill four soil boreholes to depths of approximately 20 feet bgs. SECOR recommends drilling and installing the wells after completion of the southern parking lot and landscaping at the site because it will allow SECOR to choose locations for the wells that are inconspicuous and would minimize impacts to operations of the restaurant. In addition, SECOR believes that the final well completions would be more aesthetically pleasing if done after site surfacing had occurred. R; \WP17- 11\27482\274B2 work plant.doc : y7fnwy`atee.rv�T.;mv�rs�, -•'�.' ter! 4;' a r,^; Kf'{, ser- Yr+f„tii'iP7Krsy�,,,t.��. P,"' A, Mr. Ken Hilliard Project No 01 EL.27482.03 February 3, 2004 Page 5 Final locations for the borings will be determined after excavation of source soils to tak advantage of information obtained during remedial excavation regarding distribution of contaminants, lithology, and groundwater occurrence. The boreholes will be drilled using a truck - mounted drill rig equipped with eight -inch diameter hollow stem augers. All drilling and sampling equipment will be decontaminated between sample intervals to minimize the possibility of cross contamination. Soil samples for lithologic description and chemical analysis will be collected using a clean split - spoon sampler fitted with brass or stainless steel sleeves. Soil samples will be collected at five - foot intervals, and in the vicinity of the capillary fringe while drilling. The soil samples will be monitored for evidence of contamination during drilling using a portable PID. All samples designated for chemical analysis will be handled and transported in accordance with proper regulatory protocol. After completing soil sample collection, the boreholes will be converted to groundwater monitoring wells. The wells will be constructed of two - inch - diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well screen placed from approximately 5 -feet bgs to 20 -feet bgs, and blank PVC casing placed from 5 -feet bgs to the ground surface. However, final screen intervals will be determined in the field based on groundwater observations. The wells will be completed with a flush- mounted, locking well cover. Following installation, each monitoring well will be surged, and then developed by pumping and /or bailing. Soil cuttings and decontamination, development, and purge water collected from the drilling operations will be contained in 55- gallon drums and stored on -site, pending receipt of analytical results. The drums will be transported to an appropriate disposal facility following receipt of the analytical results. Well Purging, Sampling, and Surveying A minimum of 24 hours after well development, the newly - installed groundwater monitoring wells will be sampled. Prior to sampling, each well will be purged to ensure collection of representative samples. The groundwater samples will be collected with a disposable bailer, immediately transferred to sterilized glass sample bottles, capped with TeflonTM septa, and placed in a chilled cooler for transport. In the event that liquid -phase hydrocarbons (LPH) are detected in a well, the LPH thickness will be measured, but the well will not be purged or sampled. The wells will be included in future quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling events. A licensed surveyor will survey the newly - installed monitoring well casings to an existing benchmark. Water level measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator and recorded to the nearest 0.01 foot. From this data, the groundwater gradient and flow direction will be calculated. Groundwater produced during well purging will be removed from the site the day of the fieldwork for treatment and disposal. Laboratory Analyses Samples designated for chemical analysis will be delivered under chain -of- custody and in a chilled state to OSE., an Ecology- certified analytical laboratory. All limit of excavation soil HAW P17.11 \27482\27482 work plan 1.doc S E.COR M" i, YS. t' In[ ?.... w.!. �.. t?^^+' S! as. ry!. �rir�a T�,rvK.a..rrwwe7w.x.�v,ti� 4+... r. �+ +...+e•,..+..vge...ryrartrA�T,+^: 4 SECOR Mr. Ken Hilliard Project No 01 EL.27482.03 February 3, 2004 Page 6 samples and select soil boring samples will be analyzed for TPH -G and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using Ecology- approved method NWTPH - Gx/BTEX, and for TPH -D and TPH -O by Ecology- approved method NWTPH -Dx. Based on the results of these analyses, soil samples will be selected for additional analysis of cPAHs by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8270. The initial round of groundwater samples will be analyzed for TPH -G and BTEX using Ecology - approved method NWTPH - Gx/BTEX, for TPH -D and TPH -O by Ecology- approved method NWTPH -Dx, and for cPAHs by EPA Method 8270. If cPAHs are not identified in groundwater at the site, subsequent groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells will not be submitted for the cPAH analysis. Report Preparation A remedial action report and a monitoring well installation report will each be prepared after completion of each phase of work. The remedial action report will include a description of the field activities including limit of excavation soil sampling results, unusual site conditions, total tonnage and final disposition of removed soil, and conclusions. The monitoring well installation report will include a description of the field investigation (drilling and sampling techniques), and assessment findings and conclusions. The monitoring well installation report will also include borehole /well logs, soil and groundwater contaminant concentration and plume maps, two geologic cross - sections, and a groundwater gradient map. Quarterly monitoring and sampling reports will also be generated on an ongoing basis. All reports will be reviewed and signed by a Washington State Licensed Geologist. The proposed assessment activities will be scheduled after your review and concurrence with this work plan. If you have any questions regarding this work plan, please contact our office at your convenience. Respectfully, SECOR International Incorporate anchez enior Hydrogeologist cc: John Wainwright, SECOR Courtney Jones, Strasburger, Attorneys at Law RAWP17.11\27482127482 work plan1.doc "R'.j John Wainwright Senior Project Manager Enclosures: Figure 1- Site L4 Figure 2 - Site Plan ' ilo#t:dl Probe Locations and Adjacent Properties Figure 3 - Site {{��;v - • -ted Excavation Limits Geotechnical t•s- -• 5Mccavation, dated January 25, 2001 e. e. 1d31 NO Hltld COG LRL :31V0 adnold :A8 03AOLIddV :A9 (13)103HO S11WIl NOI1YAVOX3 a31VdI311NV HAM Mdld 311S ♦ 1334 8 01 (, NR I8/ E-dOl ♦ V32N NOLLVAtlO H M3W2)Od -�- 6 SNOWWIS'S :A8 NMV2l0 C0'Z9YLZ'13L0 3l3ewnN Mr NO.ONIHSVM H1nOS 311N3AV NV9 1n2131NI LZZbL ZSVLZ 'ON 1.11110Vd NaA313 1:13141210.d . IO3 032IVd38d • OS9L (SZP) XVd/009L (OP) Hd NOlONIHSVM'ONOW03H Z01. 311nS'3N 1un00 411£1. YEOZL (133A) TWOS 31VWIX021ddV 09 0C 0 1NVLIQAH 3 H I Nye / ; ✓� / � NOLLVOO1 31dWVS 83W21od • $ �� / \ ♦ (21003S) NOUY3O1 3e08d030 4- 0L .,, C` , / / \ AavaNnoe 31)S -- - — — � � P� > ♦ (1N3O31 ♦ - 0 : ti - / SUNS! \, > ' / S / Mild 83N803 / • `\/ ' / \d0 1333 901 / / V321Y NOLLVAV3) 3 / \ ■ , 80:91 - 700Z 'CO 833 1v sNOwwiSS Ae o31di0ow Ona'(ds)287LZ \Z87LZ1N3A313 L\ S 133rroad\s3v3 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 01/29/2004 1 7 : 4 1 4_5 r f B ibL M.S.C.E., M.B.A. SECOR 12034 134 Ct. NE, Suite 102 Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Maureen Sanchez, Sr. I-jydrogeologist REFERENCES: Former 7- Eleven Site Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. January 25, 2004 Subject: Geotechnical Criteria Toe -of -Slope Excavation 14221 Interurban Ave. S, Tukwila, Washington This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation with regard to the site at 14221 Interurban Ave. S, Tukwila, Washington. This evaluation was requested by SECOR in conjunction with their investigation and analysis of impacted soils and subsequent remedial recommendations. This engineer has provided geotechnical services for the current site development (underway), Galliano restaurant. •. City of Tukwila approved Project Plans for the Galliano restaurant,, by Architect D. Thorstad ▪ Geotechnical Reports by D. Bruce, P.E. dated November 12, 2002, March 24, 2003 and subsequent Inspection Reports UNDERSTOOD ISSUES: This engineer understands that SECOR is providing technical consulting services to the 7- Eleven convenience store with regard to impacted soil issues at the site. Additional excavation and soil testing is proposed by SECOR. The locations of the additional excavations are as follows: ■ Near toe -of -slope (at rear — southwesterly) of site ■ Near frontage sidewalk zone M1LH.L LUNS I ul Geotechnical /Civil Engineer SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546 -9217 - FAX 546 -84.42 1 01i29/2004 17:41 42577890r SECOR January 25, 2004 Page 2 SUMMARY: Too -Of- Slope: MICHEL CUNSI r;-vat eJ. As discussed in this engineer's previous Geotechnical Reports, the overall slope at the rear of the property is geotechnically stable. It is essential, however that excavations do not undermine the toe -of- slope. Based on previous geotechnical test pits, and on -site inspections, this engineer recommends a varying excavation depth with horizontal distance from toe -of -slope be followed. Distance From Toe -of- Slope: Maximum Excavation Depth: 10 feet 15 feet 20 feet If necessary, additional on -site geotechnical monitoring may allow slight modifications to the maximum depth criteria presented above. Sidewalk Zone: 3 feet 5 feet 10 feet The sub -grade soils in the vicinity of the existing sidewalk will allow for standard trench box techniques to be utilized. Based on this engineer's evaluation of the sub -grade soils, and experience with similar excavations, a maximum depth of 10 feet is recommended for the "sidewalk zone ". Obviously, an experienced excavation contractor should use standard safety techniques when utilizing,the trench box methods. If necessary, additional on -site geotechnical monitoring may allow slight increases to the maximum depth criteria of 10 feet. • The proposed excavations for additional study and remedial work of impacted soils are geotechnically approved, subject to compliance with the depth and locations in this report. • As required, this engineer is to provide additional on -site geotechnical inspections to verify or modify the recommendations herein. :rgtri ~: zy ". u.. is &3iC�+s�;07i:.::"i ;�vr> » ^.u' #:. • 01!2J/ 2W14 1 r : 41 SECOR January 25, 2004 Page 3 DMB:abj 42J' t !EVA11 ', It'lll,hltL LuIV If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer O W Ai( a = ry : K tr y: y ; / 0 K AY . 1 M JL U sa:: i =sJi4 K:tz >.adL':tiffs::sdas::.+ January 22, 2004 Dear Ms. Lumb, R: \Stafh7- 11 \SEPA addendum letter.doc SECOR Ms. Carol Lumb, AICP Senior Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 RE: SEPA Addendum Former 7- Eleven Store 27482/ Galliano Property 14201 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, WA The key findings of the SI conducted by SECOR are as follows: • Groundwater entered seven of the 10 soil probe locations at 8 -feet bgs. SECOR www.secor.com INTERNATIONAL 12034 134th Court Northeast INCORPORATED Suite 102 Redmond, WA 98052 425 372 1600 TEL 425 372 1650 Eiv Per our conversation last week, I am forwarding the results of the site investigation conducted by SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR) at the above - referenced site (site). A copy of SECOR's Site Investigation (SI) Report is attached with this letter for your files, and includes the results of the soil and groundwater sampling conducted at the site. SECOR is working on this project for 7- Eleven, Inc., a former property owner for the site. As you are aware, the site is currently being developed as a restaurant and associated parking area. The site was formerly 7- Eleven store number 27482 located at the intersection of South 142nd Street and Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). The 7- Eleven store closed at this location in 1993. During excavation for subsurface utilities, potentially hydrocarbon- impacted soil was identified, and eight test pits were excavated on September 4, 2003. A total of nine soil samples and one grab groundwater samples were collected from six of the test pits. Based on those results, additional site investigation was conducted utilizing direct push (Geoprobe) soil and groundwater sampling methodology to define the nature and extent of petroleum impacts at the site. • • TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and /or cPAHs, were detected at concentrations greater than their respective Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) Method A unrestricted use soil cleanup levels (soil CULs) in soil samples collected from GP -3, GP-4, GP -5, GP -6, GP -7, and GP -8. • TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, and benzene were detected at concentrations greater than their respective MTCA Method A groundwater cleanup levels (groundwater CULs) in groundwater samples collected from GP -3, GP-4, GP -6, GP -7, and GP -8. • Based on the findings of this investigation, SECOR recommends excavation to remove the accessible hydrocarbon - impacted soil. SECOR estimates that the impacted soil volume is approximately 450 cubic yards. In addition, SECOR recommends installation of four SECOR International Incorporated ?�r.�.+xa�acem �evc�sw�+�r1�.c�er groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate hydrocarbon impact to groundwater following completion of the remedial excavation. Based on these findings, SECOR has identified the following SEPA checklist items that require input regarding this new information for the site: Section A, Background, Number 7 — The SI Report is attached with this letter Section A, Background, Number 9 — A Land Alteration Permit will be requested from the City of Tukwila for removal of impacted soils. Section B, Environmental Elements, Earth, e — Based on the results of the Si, it is proposed that approximately 450 cubic yards of impacted soil be removed from the site by excavation. The removed soil will be replaced with non - impacted Class A -1 Pit Run that will be compacted to City of Tukwila requirements. Section B, Environmental Elements, Air, a — Some of the soil being removed contains gasoline - related compounds. However, volatilization should be minimal, as the soil will be direct loaded into trucks for removal, and the work will be conducted during cool weather. In addition, air monitoring will be conducted during excavation site work to ensure worker safety and health. No air impacts are anticipated following completion of the excavation activities. Section B, Environmental Elements, Environmental Health, a — The only potential exposures are to workers at the site during removal activities. However, all work will be conducted by appropriately trained personnel who are equipped with appropriate personal protective equipment, and air monitoring will be conducted during excavation site work to ensure worker safety and health. Environmental health hazards related to impacted soil will be reduced due to the proposed excavation work. If you have any questions or comments regarding the status of the ongoing investigation and proposed remedial action for the site, please contact me at 425/372 -1600. Sincerely, SECOR International Incorporated Cc: File nchez, L.G. #652 ydrogeologist R.1Staffl7 -11 2749'2ASEPA addendum Ir tt3r.dce SECOR Enclosure: Site Investigation Report, Former 7- Eleven Facility Number 27482, January 22, 2004 2 SECOR International Inc isperated swr.* ew emmrror i January 9, 2004 Mr. Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South SeaTac, WA 98188 RE: Irrigation System for Galliano's Cucina, D03 -104 Dear Mario: David McPherson provided me with a copy of your January 2, 2004 letter requesting an 18 -month extension on the requirement to install an irrigation system to serve the landscaping foithe restaurant under construction at 14201 Interurban Avenue South. I understand that you are requesting the deferral of the irrigation system due to cost overruns you have encountered with the restaurant project. TMC 18.52.040 H. requires all landscaped areas to be served by an automatic irrigation system. It is possible to postpone the installation of the irrigation system, however, you would need to post a bond for 100% of the cost of the irrigation system (TMC 18.96.040 and 050) and 150% of the cost of labor and materials for the landscape materials (TMC 18.52.050 B.). Requiring a bond for a deferred code requirement is standard procedure to ensure that compliance with the regulation is achieved at some future time. A bond for the landscape materials is required to ensure that the materials survive without the required irrigation system. Copies of the two code citations are enclosed for your review. The Public Works Department will respond to your request for assistance on the C- curbing required on Interurban Avenue South. If you have any questions about the irrigation or landscaping bonds, please call me at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lunib Senior Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director cc: Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development Nora Gierloff, Planning Manager David McPherson, Engineer, Department of Public Works. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor c: \m docs \Galliano's Cucina \Galliano -2.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 1, a. 4 '.'L+ OnSite Enviranmental Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 • (425) 883 -3881 January 7, 2004 Maureen Sanchez SECOR P.O. Box 230 Redmond, WA 98073 Re: Analytical Data for Project 01 EL.27482 Laboratory Reference No. 0312 -140 Dear Maureen: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on December 12, 2003. Please note that this is a revised report and replaces the report dated December 22, 2003. The standard policy of OnSite Environmental Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 °i Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883-3981 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Case Narrative Samples were collected on December 12, 2003, and received by the laboratory on December 12, 2003. They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 ° C to 6 ° C. General QA /QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below. NWTPH Gx /BTEX Analysis The gasoline results for samples; gp3 @12', gp4 @4', gp4 @12', gp -5 @4' gp -6 @4', gp -6 @12' and gp -7 @8' are being impacted by the presence of diesel fuel. Any other QA /QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. ..._ NWTPH Dx Analysis No surrogate data is available for sample GP-7©8' due to the necessary dilution of the sample. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. OnSite Environtnental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 583-663i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 2 --t 4 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 16 &17 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX Client ID: gp1 @4' gp1@8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -01 12- 140 -02 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 106% 90 % OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14643 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883••3!6ti'l This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 3 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.023 ND 0.028 Toluene ND 0.11 ND 0.14 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.11 ND 0.14 m,p- Xylene ND 0.11 ND 0.14 o- Xylene ND 0.11 ND 0.14 TPI-I -Gas ND 11 ND 14 ., a! w` w. ? cL' 4 „�rtw�iS.aG:r.YnU�i.�avnr�.,:4� :.:u.;:i.':r_!a+a: wow. e�31.: a. v. a:, w` �M1�> aait4d ::twiw•wnruiiu.te+AiL:A. {r.46 ^'• Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 16 &17 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX Client ID: gp2 @4' gp2@8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -03 12- 140 -04 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.024 ND 0.027 Toluene ND 0.12 ND 0.14 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.12 ND 0.14 m,p- Xylene ND 0.12 ND 0.14 o- Xylene ND 0.12 ND 0.14 TPH -Gas ND 12 ND 14 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 99% 93% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - :881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 4 • Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) 12 -16 -03 12 -17 -03 NWTPH- Gx/BTEX Client ID: gp3 @4' gp3@8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -05 12- 140 -06 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.025 ND 0.024 Toluene ND 0.13 ND 0.12 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.13 ND 0.12 m,p- Xylene ND 0.13 ND 0.12 o- Xylene ND 0.13 ND 0.12 TPH -Gas ND 13 ND 12 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 94% 104% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) BE3 -383 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed, 5 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 17 &18 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 68% 105% Client ID: gp3©12' gp4 @4' Lab ID: 12- 140 -07 12- 140 -08 6 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.012 0.082 0.022 Toluene ND 0.061 0.21 0.11 Ethyl Benzene 0.071 0.061 ND 0.11 m,p-Xylene 0.14 0.061 0.26 0.11 o- Xylene 0.078 0.061 0.29 0.11 TPH -Gas 130 Z 6.1 450 Z 11 ..a�- n�litia.nAY :l wCL'iK.Lf diu;6∎t.' OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WM 95052 (425) 8833 -388 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) 12 -16 -03 12- 18 &19 -03 N WTPH- GxIBTEX Client ID: gp4 @8' gp4 @12' Lab ID: 12- 140 -09 12- 140 -10 7 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.012 0.053 0.014 Toluene ND 0.060 ND 0.068 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.060 0.13 0.068 m,p- Xylene ND 0.060 0.12 0.068 o- Xylene ND 0.060 ND 0.068 TPH -Gas ND 6.0 86 Z 6.8 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 84% 71% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. �CS�. jn�L'.l JYI" �leli4.'+ ti' �k§ A: Yi•`•_• iil' ia�Ti.iir`.ii::A1.44td`'w�?Ff�' ' '�W%�Y.r.Gi41.2'i� i -J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) 12 -16 -03 12- 17 &18 -03 N WTPH- GxIBTEX Client ID: gp-5 @4' 911-5@ir Lab ID: 12- 140 -11 12- 140 -12 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene 0.022 0.012 ND 0.023 Toluene ND 0.061 ND 0.12 Ethyl Benzene 0.26 0.061 ND 0.12 m,p- Xylene 0.30 0.061 ND 0.12 o- Xylene 0.079 0.061 ND 0.12 TPH -Gas 38 Z 6.1 ND 12 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 79% 106% OnSite Environmental, Inc. '1.648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883-3881 81 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Z = '~ W� Q � . JU w 0. u) J = H LL : W0 ll Q; Z H 0 Z U • o U): W: .Z - U F– — O Z W O~ _J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -16 &17 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX • Client ID: gp-6©4' gp -6 @8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -13 12- 140 -14 9 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene 1.6 0.27 ND 0.022 Toluene ND 1.3 ND 0.11 Ethyl Benzene 8.1 1.3 ND 0.11 m,p- Xylene 6.4 1.3 ND 0.11 o- Xylene 2.8 1.3 ND 0.11 TPH -Gas 3200 Z 130 ND 11 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 87% 105% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.3681 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. ..__..' =E: bps: wi :SY;�;� "'iciriaM �w'" sum :Yra�knd /,�:~aiis},;,s'id.:W:Y i.cri4 .wc.+.W54 tub. Ynckf aW3A:wi:Ro-.:Wis v'Its'i[.:MS1�kM.a.'utd t':5(ifLti a "�P.i:«c:i,,ltnm:'i:.{ +: si 'il e::!, Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 17 &19 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) N WTPH- Gx/BTEX Client ID: gp -6 @12' gp -7 @4' Lab ID: 12- 140 -15 12- 140 -16 10 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene 0.33 0.014 ND 0.024 Toluene ND 0.068 ND 0.12 Ethyl Benzene 0.085 0.068 ND 0.12 m,p- Xylene ND 0.068 ND 0.12 o- Xylene ND 0.068 ND 0.12 TPH -Gas 23 Z 6.8 ND 12 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 68% 99% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. ..;•w a... �. usu +5re_+itikY.:2erc:n�.:ati.Si,(u .rCviSU'J}ii:fiStn' Alb" H�G Hitti .C +�'a:LSY�.5��it:t3'Yx. 4' f l? k60t SOiI�. w: efY1: aYlvwfi' u'ial +7'1+�vi:�:.Yu:i?.w. ".iw� 1A3Jw�.W2. Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 17 &18 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Client ID: gp-7 @8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -17 NWTPH- Gx/BTEX gp @ 12- 140 -18 11 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene 0.030 0.014 ND 0.021 Toluene ND 0.071 ND 0.11 Ethyl Benzene 0.46 0.071 ND 0.11 m,p- Xylene 0.67 0.071 ND 0.11 o- Xylene 0.52 0.071 ND 0.11 TPH -Gas 1300 Z 140 ND 11 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 72% 107% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95'" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Ait444a.tal A1.174 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 16 &17 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Client ID: Lab ID: gp -9 @ 12- 140 -19 N WTPH- GxIBTEX gp @ 12- 140 -20 12 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.024 ND 0.025 Toluene ND 0.12 ND 0.13 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.12 ND 0.13 rn,p- Xylene ND 0.12 ND 0.13 o- Xylene ND 0.12 ND 0.13 TPH -Gas ND 12 ND 13 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 106% 97% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. YAO.d:.riai. aw' i is�t.Ntu#,Y+l suat Vg. iva 1%3:' J --J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -19 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -19 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Lab ID: 12- 139 -06 Client ID: gp -6 BENZENE by EPA 8260B Compound Results Flags PQL Benzene 700 10 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 110 80 -120 Toluene, d8 109 80 -120 4- Bromofluorobenzene 120 80 -120 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 89:3• - 388i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and Is intended only for the use of the Individual or company to whom it is addressed. 19 tl:. w: is1t<: a: xa, e:' LE:i.:i`,+.ni�.":.tu::x:.sw1.:: m.�a::�.c:u:axS:atu. yaw, u.:...+ 4rv.. c.. o. ,,+�....��•..:;w.x�c.�:.co.�4;; z ;- Z. J U U U0 LLI WI h- W } O } g J • u- U D. d ' . .z � : 'I— a • z I- U � IO U � ;0 H. = - . F - - O, w z. U S` .O F' . .z Date of Report December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: O312'13Q Project: Matrix: Water Client ID: gP Date Extracted: 12'19-03 Date Analyzed: 12-19-03 Lab ID: 12-139-08 BENZENE by EPA 8260B Compound Results Flags PQL Benzene 4.4 0.20 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 105 80420 Toluene, d8 113 80'120 4-Bromofluorobenzene 118 80420 OnSite Enviro mental, Inc. 14648NE95' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883-3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed inoccordancowitx*mxhonofumxvu and Is intended only for the use of the Individual or company to whom it is addressed. 20 W 't Compound Results Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.20 • J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -19 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -19 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Lab ID: MB1219W1 BENZENE by EPA 8260B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 112 80 -120 Toluene, d8 114 80 -120 4- Bromofluorobenzene 111 80 -120 OnSite Environmental, Inc, 14618 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3081 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 21 J1-4 r .tio14+ tic:i.,:afn''ra.• wlti�s5i 4 Z Z ;. W . 6 J 00 to cn W = J I...; � 11. W g 5• u. ¢ co W . 2 Z � I— O Z W uj t o O I- W • 0 w CD • • 0 Z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 BENZENE by EPA 8260B MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL Z Date Extracted: 12 -19 -03 Z Date Analyzed: 12 -19 -03 W W J 0 Matrix: Water 0 0 Units: ug /L (ppb) w =` J H W 0 " 2 . Lab ID: SB1219W1 g D- u_Q Spike Percent Percent Recovery N d Compound Amount MS Recovery MSD Recovery Limits Flags i_ _, Z1._ 1,1- Dichloroethene 10.0 9.64 96 10.0 100 50 -129 Z O Benzene 10.0 9.83 98 9.99 100 62 -131 W Trichloroethene 10.0 9.30 93 9.31 93 71 -117 i j D T 10.0 9.48 95 9.69 97 71 -123 U � _ ' Chlorobenzene 10.0 9.98 100 9.98 100 80 -120 0 H . W W ; 2 If— U RPD u_ 6 RPD Limit Flags LLi Z .. U � 0Ii Z 1,1- Dichloroethene 4 15 Benzene 2 10 Trichloroethene 0 12 Toluene 2 15 Chlorobenzene 0 10 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3851 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 22 OnSite Environmental Inc. Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS /MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. G - Insufficient sample quantity for duplicate analysis. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re- extracted and re- analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene - napthalene) are present in the sample. 0 - Hydrocarbons outside the defined gasoline range are present in the sample. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. V - Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - Sample extract treated with an acid cleanup procedure. Z - Gasoline results are being influenced by the presence of Diesel fuel. ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 93052 (425) 893 -3891 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 23 r= 1?: iYsy? :„ Environmental Inc. 14648 NE 95th Street • Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: (425) 883-3881 • Fax: (425) 885-4603 (in tvcirkalg days) (Check One) ❑ Same ❑ 2 D Standard (Hydroca 5 All other analyses: rbon analyses: 7 days) days, ❑ 1 Halogenated Vola by 8260B _%® EPH�) Company: 7// r! C o/L Project No.: 67/' 2 7 `f e L Project Name: Project Manager: f ivl U/;efk 'Z Sample Identification 5P- l /7,2 Date ..: *vie: (other) - -• tithe . ‘: : :_ : -• I! ;..41t : 5ampleti:. Mattl$ O525 W el; :.;. ;` ". ant ; 4 7 1 z P -- Z tzlzt3 cy/5 w y k X -3 p •- $ i7'7r , it'zv W el A 4 gP- y JZ /•3 /05 1N/ 4 / A- x o s' 1P -,— 17/7c'7 I/ 1 /5 f VJ `/ X X up of -_ c /21703 /zoo vu y X /• C .--? 5.7 1Z17 €5 IZvi \V Y X iC g cp -c /277.45 132c W 1/ x/ `l f5P -7 g/1-e 4 /'7/5 W =' x A p /1r /2at75 153e VJ y e< X RELI UI ED BY DATE --.. DATE COMMENTS: FIRM e- �- TIME /"" Y �� J 1 TIME KLS SS RELINQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED BY DATE FIRM TIME FIRM TIME REVIEWED BY DATE REVIEWED Chromatographs with final report 111 OnSite Chain of Custody DISTRIBUTION LEGEND: White - OnSile Copy Yellow - Repor Copy P ink - Cl i -_I NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. E Page > e! • > / ` \ ` | • Date of Re December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: O312'14O Project:OiEL27482 Date Extracted: 1246&21'03 Date An : 12-17&21-03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) NVVTPH'Go/BTEX Client ID: Ap'9@9' Qp40©4' Lab ID: 12-140-21 12-140-22 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 80% 88% Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.014 ND 0.028 Toluene ND 0.071 ND 0.14 ND D Ethyl Benzene . 071 ND 0.14 m.p-Xylena ND 0.071 ND 0i14 o-Xylene ND 0.071 ND 0i14 TPH-Gas ND 7.1 ND 14 OnSite Env Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 90052 (425) 883- 981 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 13 7 l NWTPH-Gx/BTEX Date Extracted: 12-16-03 „. 11 • r••■•■ Date Analyzed: 12-16-03 0 ,... , . Matrix: Soil — Units: mg/kg (ppm) !! ....ji Client ID: gp-10@8' .,, Lab ID: . 12-140-23 , --1 • ;.,. .'; • 7 Result PQL Flags Benzene . ND 0.012 ... .., —1. Toluene ND 0.060 4 ---.) 1 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.060 • :,,•-•,, m,p-Xylene ND 0.060 I j i • o-Xylene ND 0.060 • TPH-Gas ND 6.0 1 . , . . . Surrogate Recovery: i , Fluorobenzene 84% I Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140 Project: 01EL.27482 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95” Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 14 rt 0 O 0? • 0 W I: —J w O g 11- < c 11 Z I— 0 Z LLI 2 a a' 0 • cl 111 S Z u). C.) 0 1-- Z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 Lab ID: MB1216S1 Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.010 Toluene ND 0.050 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.050 m,p-Xylene ND 0.050 o- Xylene ND 0.050 TPH -Gas ND 5.0 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 113% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14646 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 863 -30131 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 15 • Z 2 F JU UO: .co W =. LL W 0: 2 g tL Q. - = • • Z � . F- Z U 0 : rn O . 'O W W` Z •I— (J'. P. —O til Z. N . .— 0 F- Z...: �. Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 115% 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 Lab ID: MB1216S2 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.010 Toluene ND 0.050 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.050 m,p- Xylene ND 0.050 o- Xylene ND 0.050 TPH -Gas ND 5.0 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 16 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: NWTPH- Gx /BTEX METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 MB1216S3 Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.010 Toluene ND 0.050 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.050 m,p- Xylene ND 0.050 o- Xylene ND 0.050 TPH -Gas ND 5.0 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 87% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3Ei61 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 17 S :s;!ce`1}•l.,_ ...,. :.�; Yip;= t3« i.: visri'-+ t��. i�+ 4e+ �a7reu; lwu. ouc:..,. w:.. ti::.;;..+ u.. _uiw:,. ✓: •.. .. Z H Z cc 2 6 J U O N O, W W W J H. w O, g Q co = W Z I— O Z h: U w W ': I— U w lam, —O w Z: U c. O �:;laM *AV.hw 4..r4 , .... aw.. n..., a w , r.�«...�.....,..7..ws�.,++rs z... 14e1.1.44..iNi4 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: NWTPH- Gx /BTEX METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL 12 -21 -03 12 -21 -03 MB1221S1 Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 0.010 Toluene ND 0.050 Ethyl Benzene ND 0.050 m,p- Xylene ND 0.050 o- Xylene ND 0.050 TPH -Gas ND 5.0 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 88% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 08052 (425) 8834801 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 18 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12 -16 -03 12 -19 -03 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Surrogate Recovery: • Fluorobenzene 76% 70% 12- 140 -05 12- 140 -05 Original Duplicate RPD Flags Benzene ND ND NA Toluene ND ND NA Ethyl Benzene ND ND NA rn,p- Xylene ND ND NA o-Xylene ND ND NA TPH -Gas ND ND NA OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3581 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 19 Date Analyzed: Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 NWTPH- GxIBTEX DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Benzene ND ND NA Toluene ND ND NA Ethyl Benzene ND ND NA m,p- Xylene ND ND NA o- Xylene ND ND NA TPH -Gas ND ND NA Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 106% 104% 12- 140 -19 12- 140 -19 Original Duplicate RPD Flags OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. t,4.41 a., a- nruc , 20 ( ) | ^ | 1 1 � ) | } Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140 Pnoject:D1EL27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12-16-03 12-16-03 NWTPH-Gx/BTEX DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12440'23 12440'23 Original Duplicate RPD Flags Benzene ND ND NA Toluene ND ND NA Ethyl Benzene ND ND NA ND ND NA m.p��y�no ND NA ND m o-Xylene " .~` TPH-Gas ND ND NA Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 84% 8396 fl On Site Environmental, Inc. 14O4ONE95'' Street, Redmond, VVA 98052 (425 8133-3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain ,.,____ . and Is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 21 ,z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12 -21 -03 12 -21 -03 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Benzene ND ND NA Toluene ND ND NA Ethyl Benzene ND ND NA m,p- Xylene ND ND NA o- Xylene ND ND NA TPH -Gas ND ND NA Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 86% 83% 12- 197 -15 12- 197 -15 Original Duplicate RPD Flags OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 22 C9i4ii.<ii+vvl "s "�::ileSit� ••'�: ...a54w'� ?j: Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12 -16 -03 12 -18 -03 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL 23 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Spike Level: 1.00 ppm Lab ID: 12- 140 -05 Percent 12- 140 -05 Percent MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Benzene 0.759 76 0.776 78 2 Toluene 0.771 77 0.800 80 4 Ethyl Benzene 0.802 80 0.838 84 4 rn,p- Xylene 0.872 87 0.883 88 1 o- Xylene 0.813 81 0.863 86 6 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 73% 77% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. -j Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 NWTPH-Gx/BTEX MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 85% 82% 24 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Spike Level: 1.00 ppm Lab ID: 12- 140 -23 Percent 12- 140 -23 Percent MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Benzene 0.872 87 0.849 85 3 Toluene 0.831 83 0.825 83 1 Ethyl Benzene 0.850 85 0.833 83 2 rn,p- Xylene 0.839 84 0.832 83 1 o- Xylene 0.845 85 0.830 83 2 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 025) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cushdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. ..n.x...u.� «.u. rvMraK.:.gc� +V- �+�cNu••w,vr.wYi'«:4'�iai .44 ;« " r...wu • m:.:.9 ..lust %arcL' '.:�C•G,.aii bT..7 } Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -21 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -21 -03 N WTPH- Gx/BTEX MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL Benzene 0.820 82 0.847 85 3 Toluene 0.796 80 0.817 82 3 Ethyl Benzene 0.806 81 0.836 84 4 m,p- Xylene 0.801 80 0.838 84 5 o- Xylene 0.806 81 0.832 83 3 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 80% 82% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.3391 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 25 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Spike Level: 1.00 ppm Lab ID: 12- 197 -15 Percent 12- 197 -15 Percent MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12- 16 &18 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 17,18 &19 -03 NWTPH -Dx Client ID: GP1 @4' GP1 @8' GP2©4' Lab ID: 12- 140 -01 12- 140 -02 12- 140 -03 Diesel Range: 230 ND ND PQL: 28 35 29 Identification: Diesel Fuel #1 — Lube Oil Range: 550 ND ND PQL: 57 70 59 Identification: Lube Oil Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Flags: 94% Y 106% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 ° i Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -38 '61 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 89% Y Y 26 4 • • • Date of Report: Decembe 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140 Pnojuut:O1EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Client ID: GP2@8' GP3@4' GP3@8' Lab ID: 12-140-04 12-140-05 12-140-06 Diesel Range: ND 94 34 32 Diesel ^ -~~--"-- -- ' ~~ ^' Identification: Lube Oil Rang PQL: Identification: 12-16-03 ND 68 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl: 103% 104% Y Y Flags: On Site Environmental, Inc. 14O48NE85 Street, Redmond, VVA QDO52(425)88V:08i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbd . and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. ND 150 300 1800 63 290 Lube Oil Lube Oil 96% Y 27 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Client ID: GP3 @12' GP4 @4' GP4 @8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -07 12- 140 -08 12- 140 -09 Diesel Range: 150 150 1300 PQL: 31 140 30 Identification: Diesel Fuel #1 Diesel Fuel #1 Diesel Fuel #1 Lube Oil Range: 430 2200 710 PQL: 61 280 60 Identification: Lube Oil Lube Oil Lube Oil Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: 12 -16 -03 12-16,18419-03 79% N WTP H -Dx 102% 98% Flags: Y V V OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 9501 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 28 Z � re 6 2 J U 00 U) 0. J = F— W W WWo LL Q to � I e W Z F— Z 0 uj U CI • N; CI F- ill W I V , li-� Gll Z U= 0E- Z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 17 &18 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) @ Client ID: GP4 12' GP -5 @4' GP -5 @8' Lab ID: 12- 140 -10 12 -140 -11 12- 140 -12 — Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Diesel Range: 1600 66 310 PQL: 34 31 29 Identification: Diesel Fuel #1 Diesel Fuel #1 Diesel Fuel #1 Lube Oil Range: 110 410 860 �l PQL: 68 61 58 Identification: Lube Oil Lube Oil Lube Oil 103% NWTPH -Dx 107% 113% Flags: Y Y Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 'Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3661 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 29 :.t ct AM4rd' ':tjii :••'..�i± 3iN�}: s, ,} .e.Vi };at' 44.:1,4xL7:'� -LIiF: — 'Y Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12- 17 &18 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Client ID: Lab ID: GP -6 @4' 12- 140 -13 Diesel Range: 6500 PQL: 33 Identification: Diesel Fuel #1 NWTPH -Dx GP -6 @8' 12- 140 -14 ND 27 Lube Oil Range: 280 ND ND PQL: 67 54 68 Identification: Lube Oil Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: 116% 120% 99% Flags: Y Y Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883- 388i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. GP -6 @12' 12- 140 -15 37 34 Diesel Fuel #1 30 '.:CrJw:'.ieLitil.Lk�:L�b:F �'�:3' wok+ siTi :i`5 ctJ,.tii+i'TJA1k.Ue.:::< • +_ -w�.;Y Nw4 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Client ID: GP -7 @4' GP -7 @8' GP -8 @B' Lab ID: 12- 140 -16 12- 140 -17 12- 140 -18 Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: 12 -16 -03 12- 17 &19 -03 ND 30 NWTPH -Dx 25000 360 Diesel Fuel #1 Lube Oil Range: ND ND 2200 PQL: 60 710 270 Identification: — — Lube Oil Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: 102% — 96% Flags: Y Y,S Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. ND 130 31 J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Client ID: Lab ID: Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: Lube Oil Range: PQL: Identification: Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: 12 -16 -03 12- 17 &18 -03 GP -9 @4' 12- 140 -19 ND 29 ND 59 109% N WTP H -Dx GP -9 @8' 12- 140 -20 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 388 . i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. GP -9 @9' 12- 140 -21 ND ND 31 36 110 880 63 71 Lube Oil Lube Oil 96% 89% Flags: Y Y Y 32 111.0' 54: aiN- iiryaus;�;:�LaJ..aJw;L.: ' 37AY: utt7 ::/i.'at..�4bJ.�ti�lrr >}G�A:J. •• • -j Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12-16-03 12-17-03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Client ID: Lab ID: GP-10@4' 12-140-22 NWTPH-Dx GP-10@8' 12-140-23 Diesel Range: ND ND PQL: 36 30 Identification: — Lube Oil Range: ND ND PQL: 71 60 Identification: — Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl: Flags: 91% 104% Y n On Site Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 863-3801 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain ot cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 33 (44,1414.:ja.iaf z. w 6 = O 0. u) • u_ w 0 g -71 U- < w x. z 1-0 Z ▪ La 0 0 0 • w I 0 . Z O W ' P O 1- z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB1216S1 Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: Lube Oil Range: PQL: Identification: Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Flags: 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 NWTPH -Dx METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL ND 25 ND 50 117% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 95052 (425) 863-30B1 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 34 �ci?Lqr .C6:;l..Jl..m.dudoaia;:r�sur rods : +3ai:kcu::;sitiu:fs:.:sse;.� +:mow ?:.:�:tw•�:w:;�� rd.: �: •Z - z. f Q Y W 2. D' . JU U O fn O W = w O' Q N d W Z •t--0 Z U „ O cn W 1-- H O 1u 2t U N 0 Z • Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: Lube Oil Range: PQL: Identification: Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl: Flags: 12 -16 -03 12 -16 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB1216S2 NWTPH -Dx METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL ND 25 ND 50 108% Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 35 wvci: d:. iui 1 : ii.: s+: Iri J' 1„ . ti. w4wt7: ll. r. tiwJ.:' w1�3. fk :iJ:>fdN+�'LLr6:Uai�(.V7J. ?'. Z Z 11.1 J U 0 0 : N 0 rn J H w w 0 . g J LL = CI I w Z I— 0 Z F— LU 0 :0 S 0 I0 u_� O w Z O Z -j. _.) Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB1218S2 Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: Lube Oil Range: PQL: Identification: Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl: Flags: 12-18-03 12-18-03 NWTPH-Dx METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL ND 25 ND 50 91% Y n OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 99052 (425) 883-88I This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 36 Diesel Range: ND • PQL: 25 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Units: Lab ID: RPD: N/A Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl: 106% Flags: 12-16-03 12-17-03 1 Soil mg/kg (ppm) NWTPH-Dx DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12-140-02 12-140-02 DUP Y ND 25 93% Y On Site Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 37 3 Date Extracted: — j Date Analyzed: • 4a Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Lab ID: Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Flags: 12 -16 -03 12 -18 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Diesel Range: ND PQL: 25 RPD: N/A NWTPH -Dx DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12- 140 -04 12 -140 -04 DUP 103% Y ND 25 105% Y 38 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883-3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Z iF Z re w 6 U O' W= W w O, g -J u_ <, ▪ W H 1 ' Z �. Z O ff• U • O 13 (22: :C1 = U . —O Z U= O~ Z • J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Lab ID: Flags: 12 -16 -03 12 -19 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Diesel Range: ND PQL: 130 RPD: N/A NWTPH-Dx DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12- 140 -06 12 -140 -06 DUP ND 130 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: 96% 83% Y Y n OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 39 rilm.' r.> iA}'.} wabrG .f.'u.kYA++ri�iril�a'.W.�..J e.f. .hMarwr:uw: M.awf,}'k+snt wLiN:a.44.1i�5h7�: Z Z W. 6 JU 'U 0. to • W2 CO W' W O; LL. Q: = d: I— Ill' • Z 1-01 • Z 1- W a p 'O '❑ W W : 1 V' . LL-~ W Z' 'U S: H � O .'Z • Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: Diesel Range: ND PQL: 25 RPD: N/A Surrogate Recovery o- Terpheriyl: 102% 96 % Flags: 12 -18 -03 12 -18 -03 NWTPH -Dx DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12- 170 -05 12- 170 -05 DUP ND 25 Y Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 983 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 40 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Analyzed: 12 -16 -03 % MOISTURE Client ID Lab ID % Moisture --f gp -1 @ 4' 12- 140 -01 12 gp @ 8' 12- 140 -02 29 gp -2 @ 4' 12- 140 -03 15 gp -2 @ 8' 12- 140 -04 26 gp @ 4' 12- 140 -05 21 1 gp @ 8' 12- 140 -06 15 gp © 12' 12- 140 -07 18 :. „1 gp-4 © 4' 12- 140 -08 10 gp-4 @ 8' 12- 140 -09 16 gp-4 @ 12' 12 -140 -10 27 gp @ 4' 12- 140 -11 18 gP @ 12- 140 -12 14 gp -6 @ 4' 12- 140 -13 25 v i gp @ 8' 12- 140 -14 8 gp -6 @ 12' 12- 140 -15 27 1 gP - 7 @ 4' 12- 140 -16 17 J gP - 7 @ 8' 12- 140 -17 30 gp -8 © 8' 12- 140 -18 6 1 gp -9 @ 4' 12 -140 -19 15 -' gP -9 @ 8' 12- 140 -20 20 12- 140 -21 30 { gp @ 4' 12- 140 -22 29 gp -10 © 8' 12- 140 -23 16 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 369'i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 41 i:: w;, x. s: L.? MI..,. v✓ r.: p9w. ii«;*: a: rG; a:> LtiS, df2 le :a:rr.Xiasacis:;_E+itl:iti':�"y ik•�' +h:,;.'.r 4'``!¢:%r'b:�f6 'F •,; aW:.1,Gi1.ir:fs i;.W:.rY tita..4A+t,V.1. uY.i':u A- Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS /MSD recovery data. i B- The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C -The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E- The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F- Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. G - Insufficient sample quantity for duplicate analysis. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re- extracted and re- analyzed with similar results. L -The RPD is outside of the control limits. M- Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene- napthalene) are present in the sample. O- Hydrocarbons outside the defined gasoline range are present in the sample. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. V- Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W- Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside contol limits due to matrix effects. X- Sample extract treated with a silica gel cleanup procedure. Y- Sample extract treated with an acid cleanup procedure. Z - Gasoline results are being influenced by the presence of Diesel fuel. ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference OnSite Environmental Inc. Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 "' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 8•i This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of cusbdy, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 42 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 • (425) 883 -3881 January 8, 2004 Maureen Sanchez SECOR P.O. Box 230 Redmond, WA 98073 Re: Analytical Data for Project 01 EL.27482 Laboratory Reference No. 0312 -140B Dear Maureen: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on December 12, 2003. The standard policy of OnSite Environmental Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. David Baumeister Project Manager OnSite Environmental Inc. Enclosures OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. �Y�.uf tt�si:�:i�? �� .rt� J Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Z Samples were collected on December 12, 2003, and received by the laboratory on December 12, 2003. 2 1—: They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 ° C to 6 ° C. ;I— Z General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be t6i U indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and U O: involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below. w = Halogenated Volatiles EPA 8260B Analysis N 1- Methylene Chloride is a common laboratory solvent which may have been introduced during sample W 0 preparation and thereby be impacting the results for samples gp3 @ 8' and gp -8 @8'. 2 J Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote rn reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. _ w PAHs EPA 8270C /SIM (12- 23 -03) Analysis ? 1 " I— O Sample 12- 120 -04 was analyzed as the Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate. Naphthalene, w H. Acenaphthylene, and Acenaphthene have relative percent difference (RPD) values higher than the D control limit. Since the Spike Blank was within QC limits, the problem was attributed to nonhomogeneity of D 0 0 the sample and no futher corrective action was taken. 0 H Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote H U r and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. H u"O . Z a W U= The sample set extracted on 1 -7 -04 was requested by the client on 1 -6 -04. These samples were ~O (— extracted out of holding time, which expired on 12- 26 -03. Z The Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate on sample 12- 140 -05 for Acenaphthene, Fluorene, and Phenanthrene have recoveries above the control limits. The high recoveries were attributed to the nonhomogenious mixture of the sample. All other QC requirements were met and no further corrective action was taken. PAHs EPA 8270C /SIM (1 -6 -04) Analysis Case Narrative Terphenyl -d14 was the only recoverable surrogate in sample GP7 @8' (12- 140 -17) due to the high concentration of analytes. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. OnSito Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3801 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 2 vnaiC cM. 4iimrtil 4, 4S' � LL' Ii r M. �u« w:+ 4 . �. rw.+ tu: u: �. �.. �...•,+.. a++ nw. W+ w�..... a....,....- .. ✓..n. �wY.wfw�i�s.WJtluLu Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B page 1 of 2 12 -23 -03 12 -23 -03 Lab ID: 12- 140 -06 Client ID: gp3 @8' Compound Results Flags POL Dichlorodifluorom ethane ND 0.0012 Chloromethane ND 0.0012 Vinyl Chloride ND 0.0012 Bromomethane ND 0.0012 Chloroethane ND 0.0012 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.0012 1,1- Dichloroethene ND 0.0012 lodomethane ND 0.0059 Methylene Chloride 0.0094 H 0.0059 (trans) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0012 1,1- Dichloroethane ND 0.0012 2,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0012 (cis) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0012 Bromochloromethane ND 0.0012 Chloroform ND 0.0012 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane ND 0.0012 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0012 1,1- Dichloropropene ND 0.0012 1,2- Dichloroethane ND 0.0012 Trichloroethene ND 0.0012 1,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0012 Dibromomethane ND 0.0012 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.0012 2- Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND 0.0059 (cis) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0012 (trans) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0012 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 9.5''' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 893 -3681 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the Individual or company to whom it is addressed. C;Y 4.4.2.1 ' . umu. 0n.44 .ai41, ;.vn.0 xsWL 4.1411 rAii .4!. o'.iuN1iL'l:= "�:=� -c:is �r'`Ldtl�Y "•Y �_,f �: Iyc1 "n'i:nl�.. • Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Compound Results Flags PQL 1,1,2- Trichloroethane ND 0.0012 Tetrachloroethene ND 0.0012 1,3- Dichloropropane ND 0.0012 Dibromochlorom ethane ND 0.0012 1,2- Dibromoethane ND 0.0012 Chlorobenzene ND 0.0012 1,1,1,2 - Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0012 Bromoform ND 0.0012 Bromobenzene ND 0.0012 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0012 1,2,3 - Trichloropropane ND 0.0012 2- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0012 4- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0012 1,3- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0012 1,4- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0012 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0012 1,2- Dibromo- 3- chloropropane ND 0.0059 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0012 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.0059 1,2,3- Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0012 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 69 60 -137 Toluene, d8 88 71 -129 4- Bromofluorobenzene 87 60 -149 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3861 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chairs of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B page2of2 Q Lab ID: 12- 140 -06 W Client ID: gp3 @8' JU U O; c cnw W = J f.... W O '. g a • d; H _ Z � H O Z I- • W, U 0 'O z 0 1— W w. 0 1 L I O. .'it1 :i:t.»:.tt�i«tib'::d'+ +us7.:. •.'�Si+):t:,ZY�il ' »N..R 1:.E: x.4:tL+��iii� TSC:ue:ew� Y:a:WI...4,7141xuri)wa{ idLYX +.viwaiu .nYW.i:Jiu44Y wLi.S:iJiu'N'a 11tC,e °'liltw Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B page 1 of 2 12 -23 -03 12 -23 -03 Lab ID: 12- 140 -08 Client ID: gp4 @4' Compound Results Flags PQL Dichlorodifluorom ethane ND 0.0056 Chloromethane ND 0.0056 Vinyl Chloride ND 0.0056 Bromomethane ND 0.0056 Chloroethane ND 0.0056 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.0056 1,1- Dichloroethene ND 0.0056 lodomethane ND 0.028 Methylene Chloride ND 0.028 (trans) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0056 1,1- Dichloroethane ND 0.0056 2,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0056 (cis) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0056 Bromochloromethane ND 0.0056 Chloroform ND 0.0056 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane ND 0.0056 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0056 1,1- Dichloropropene ND 0.0056 1,2- Dichloroethane ND 0.0056 Trichloroethene ND 0.0056 1,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0056 Dibromomethane ND 0.0056 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.0056 2- Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND 0.028 (cis) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0056 (trans) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0056 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 ° ' Street, Redmond, WA 90052 (425) 083 -3381 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. _1 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Lab ID: 12- 140 -08 Client ID: gp4 @4' HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B page 2 of 2 Compound Results Flags POL 1,1,2 - Trichloroethane ND 0.0056 Tetrachloroethene ND 0.0056 1,3- Dichloropropane ND 0.0056 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.0056 1,2- Dibromoethane ND 0.0056 Chlorobenzene ND 0.0056 1,1,1,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0056 Bromoform ND 0.0056 Bromobenzene ND 0.0056 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0056 1,2,3- Trichloropropane ND 0.0056 2- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0056 4- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0056 1,3- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0056 1,4- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0056 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0056 1,2- Dibromo -3- chloropropane ND 0.028 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0056 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.028 1,2,3- Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0056 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 97 60 -137 Toluene, d8 93 71 -129 4- Bromofluorobenzene 88 60 -149 OnSit9 Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain oI custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 6 __1 I 1 i Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12 -23 -03 12 -23 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: Client ID: HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B page 1 of 2 12- 140 -18 gp @ Compound Results Flags PQL Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.0011 Chloromethane ND 0.0011 Vinyl Chloride ND 0.0011 Bromomethane ND 0.0011 Chloroethane ND 0.0011 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.0011 1,1- Dichloroethene ND 0.0011 lodomethane ND 0.0053 Methylene Chloride 0.015 H 0.0053 (trans) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0011 1,1- Dichloroethane ND 0.0011 2,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0011 (cis) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0011 Bromochloromethane ND 0.0011 Chloroform ND 0.0011 1,1,1 - Trichloroethane ND 0.0011 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0011 1,1- Dichloropropene ND 0.0011 1,2- Dichloroethane ND 0.0011 Trichloroethene ND 0.0011 1,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0011 Dibromomethane ND 0.0011 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.0011 2- Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND 0.0053 (cis) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0011 (trans) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0011 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 7 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B page 2 of 2 Lab ID: 12- 140 -18 Client ID: gp-8 @8' Compound Results Flags PQL 1,1,2- Trichloroethane ND 0.0011 Tetrachloroethene ND 0.0011 1 ,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.0011 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.0011 1,2- Dibromoethane ND 0.0011 Chlorobenzene ND 0.0011 1,1,1,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0011 Bromoform ND 0.0011 Bromobenzene ND 0.0011 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0011 1,2,3- Trichloropropane ND 0.0011 2- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0011 4- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0011 1,3- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0011 1,4- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0011 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0011 1,2- Dibromo- 3- chloropropane ND 0.0053 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0011 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.0053 1,2,3- Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0011 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 98 60 -137 Toluene, d8 89 71 -129 4- Bromofluorobenzene 85 60 -149 CH Site Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95'r' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3831 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 8 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12 -23 -03 12 -23 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL page 1 of 2 9 wig.' • :1:) ..IZ }...= :.c: =: , ., ;a,:;.its.;::;:i:`,.._.. te:�;,.+ix': • ,r,;;tut< ricer; ;z:�. :rdr::; <F:.+A3r`s•.a:. a ..:,,c ine• S:k- .wu.eFtaiean • •tiww�.3YS+.cc. Lab ID: MB1223S1 Compound Results Flags PQL Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.0010 Chloromethane ND 0.0010 Vinyl Chloride ND 0.0010 Bromomethane ND 0.0010 Chloroethane ND 0.0010 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.0010 1,1- Dichloroethene ND 0.0010 lodomethane ND 0.0050 Methylene Chloride ND 0.0050 (trans) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0010 1,1- Dichloroethane ND 0.0010 2,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0010 (cis) 1,2- Dichloroethene ND 0.0010 Bromochloromethane ND 0.0010 Chloroform ND 0.0010 1,1,1- Trichloroethane ND 0.0010 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0010 1,1- Dichloropropene ND 0.0010 1,2- Dichloroethane ND 0.0010 Trichloroethene ND 0.0010 1,2- Dichloropropane ND 0.0010 Dibromomethane ND 0.0010 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.0010 2- Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether ND 0.0050 (cis)1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0010 (trans) 1,3- Dichloropropene ND 0.0010 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95``' Street, Redmond, WA 980'52 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 } Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 • —J Lab ID: MB1223S1 HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL page 2 of 2 Compound Results Flags PQL 1,1,2- Trichloroethane ND 0.0010 Tetrachloroethene ND 0.0010 1 ,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.0010 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.0010 1 ,2- Dibrom oethane ND 0.0010 Chlorobenzene ND 0.0010 1,1,1,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0010 Bromoform ND 0.0010 Bromobenzene ND 0.0010 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0010 1,2,3- Trichloropropane ND 0.0010 2- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0010 4- Chlorotoluene ND 0.0010 1,3- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0010 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0010 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0010 1,2- Dibromo- 3- chloropropane ND 0.0050 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0010 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 0.0050 1,2,3- Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0010 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 90 60 -137 Toluene, d8 87 71-129 4- Bromofluorobenzene 91 60 -149 i:.II:- 1li:.'.:f.1:E'i � �' =C�u�i G' ra 0 . 1. (4m: 6 4*7es 3 :4 7 .0441114tw;:.xsa u.;. ai , nuw. ��1L,,. oaN..o-zue:n�t�'mtil�^w�.+i.:k�sd isu, si: istiasiai�;? uo-'. Yr, Y,YSiwu'�1: >iutu.?yr.. tau ;llui: OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.31;181 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 10 —J Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 HALOGENATED VOLATILES by EPA 8260B Z MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL _ i..: Date Extracted: 12 -23 -03 c4 W Q om, Date Analyzed: 12 -23 -03 J U O 0 Matrix: Soil co 0 co in Units: mg /kg (ppm) W = J 1 0) u W O Lab ID: 12- 192 -15 g 5 co D Sample Spike Percent Percent Recovery = w Compound Amount Amount MS Recovery MSD Recovery Limits Flags Z H 1,1- Dichloroethene ND 0.0500 0.0530 106 0.0577 115 30 -1 , 53 Z E' U.1 ui Benzene ND 0.0500 0.0507 101 0.0566 113 58 -140 Trichloroethene ND 0.0500 0.0556 111 0.0544 109 38 -130 Toluene ND 0.0500 0.0569 114 0.0546 109 28 -147 0 =. Chlorobenzene ND 0.0500 0.0560 112 0.0588 118 47 -131 W = W I` U F - RPD Z RPD Limit Flags W U c° 0 Z 1,1- Dichloroethene Benzene Trichloroethene Toluene Chlorobenzene 9 11 2 4 5 11 11 11 10 11 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95'" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3381 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 11 r...aars�i:a >t.'A+?tit:C�l sir:: isisu: id' ca': �sAivaJSY5t5 's�2:w:v.ii1'Za�l:., ~- t 1 orniri Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -23 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -23 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -06 Client ID: GP -3 @8' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags POL Naphthalene 0.11 0.078 2- Methylnaphthalene 0.14 0.078 1- Methylnaphthalene 0.13 0.078 Acenaphthylene ND 0.078 Acenaphthene 0.38 0.078 Fluorene 0.24 0.078 Phenanthrene 1.3 0.078 Anthracene 0.26 0.078 Fluoranthene 1.4 0.078 Pyrene 1.1 0.078 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.36 0.078 Chrysene 0.47 0.078 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.27 0.078 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.25 0.078 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.30 0.078 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene 0.16 0.078 Dibenz[a,h)anthracene ND 0.078 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.20 0.078 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 98 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 87 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 100 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 863 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 12 _ J . pat Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -23 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -23 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -08 Client ID: GP -4 @4' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.074 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.074 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.074 Acenaphthylene ND 0.074 Acenaphthene ND 0.074 Fluorene ND 0.074 Phenanthrene 0.22 0.074 Anthracene ND 0.074 Fluoranthene 0.29 0.074 Pyrene 0.29 0.074 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.13 0.074 Chrysene 0.16 0.074 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.15 0.074 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.12 0.074 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.16 0.074 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene 0.097 0.074 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.074 Benzo[g,h,ijperylene 0.13 0.074 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 91 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 76 33 - 100 Terphenyi -d14 94 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14848 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 13 :a Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -23 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -24 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -18 Client ID: GP-8 @8' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.071 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.071 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.071 Acenaphthylene ND 0.071 Acenaphthene ND 0.071 Fluorene ND 0.071 Phenanthrene 0.13 0.071 Anthracene ND 0.071 Fluoranthene ND 0.071 Pyrene 0.15 0.071 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.19 0.071 Chrysene 0.71 0.071 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.17 0.071 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.071 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.14 0.071 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.071 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene 0.083 0.071 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.16 0.07.1 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 89 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 74 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 87 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 ' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 14 ! `M , s`+'+.? t• a:?# f�:.' ii:- i' >=4:i�43r�.' t �?a c�..�tiM'L _ ., ",'Y� «'L:•�' *. • '-t! • i Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -23 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -23 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB1223S1 Surrogate : Nitrobenzene -d5 2- Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl -d14 PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0067 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0067 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0067 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0067 Acenaphthene ND 0.0067 Fluorene ND 0.0067 Phenanthrene ND 0.0067 Anthracene ND 0.0067 Fluoranthene ND 0.0067 Pyrene ND 0.0067 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0067 Chrysene ND 0.0067 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0067 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0067 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0067 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0067 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0067 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0067 Percent Control Recovery Limits 80 27 -107 78 33 -100 106 55 - 106 CnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 8833801 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and Is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 15 • Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Compound: 12 -23 -03 12 -23 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 120 -04 PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL Sample Spike Percent Percent Recovery Amount Amount MS Recovery MSD Recovery Limits Flags Naphthalene ND 0.0833 0.0262 31 0.0465 56 24 -111 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0833 0.0439 53 0.0626 75 25 -121 Acenaphthene ND 0.0833 0.0429 52 0.0623 75 25 -113 Fluorene ND 0.0833 0.0619 74 0.0716 86 25 -133 Phenanthrene 0.0375 0.0833 0.0989 74 0.0938 68 24 -137 Fluoranthene 0.0663 0.0833 0.130 76 0.114 57 23 -152 Pyrene 0.0501 0.0833 0.115 78 0.102 62 31 -140 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.0217 0.0833 0.0963 90 0.0869 78 30 -148 Chrysene 0.0247 0.0833 0.0909 79 0.0823 69 29 -142 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.0254 0.0833 0.102 92 0.0973 86 27 -151 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0230 0.0833 0.0961 88 0.0866 76 27 -144 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0246 0.0833 0.0990 89 0.0895 78 10 -162 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene 0.0175 0.0833 0.0944 92 0.0879 84 17 -159 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0193 0.0833 0.0932 89 0.0851 79 19 -144 RPD RPD Limit Flags Naphthalene 56 33 L Acenaphthylene 35 24 L Acenaphthene 37 27 L Fluorene 15 26 Phenanthrene 5 32 Fluoranthene 13 43 Pyrene 12 31 Benzo[a]anthracene 10 22 Chrysene 10 24 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 5 23 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 10 23 Benzo[a]pyrene 10 24 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene 7 21 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 9 18 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95`" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 88;3-3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 16 i;:e. Yt:ir3wi:+'a;:�:d:ae3+ar''.uure r+. tr.:» rts,' 4ta ::;kivdawaL. w ,...,u,+q ■ . -J Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -22 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -24 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -06 Client ID: gP3 @8' PCBs by EPA 8082 Result PQL Aroclor 1016: ND 0.059 Aroclor 1221: ND 0.059 Aroclor 1232: ND 0.059 Aroclor 1242: ND 0.059 Aroclor 1248: ND 0.059 Aroclor 1254: ND 0.059 Aroclor 1260: ND 0.059 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 66 41 -128 Flags: OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed, 17 s'.' F, t:. �& ��:Y bdr, .: a�CT_ isk.:+.•.x,: ss...::; �er�itir.: t:;tudit,G."K'r:�)ae��dcw�. : a:, i�wvv�. kitt+: x�ea. �tsa' avai:, t: a; G.+, nw- ti. o. ea' am. vn�w�. kux ..u.+ssww'e.�a....q::uuwuy.�.:c 3 3 3 3 , Date of Report: January 8, 2004 ---, , Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12-22-03 Date Analyzed: 12-24-03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) • •• • • . ! ■•••;i,1 , :"• , r*,:11 , 373 , 4.3zvix:304 - 01.3 r•A'111.13e Surrogate Decachlorobiphenyl Flags: Lab ID: 12-140-08 Client ID: gP4@4' PCBs by EPA 8082 Result PQL Aroclor 1016: ND 0.056 Aroclor 1221: ND 0.056 Aroclor 1232: ND 0.056 Aroclor 1242: ND 0.056 Aroclor 1248: ND 0.056 Aroclor 1254: ND 0.056 Aroclor 1260: ND 0.056 Percent Control Recovery Limits 66 41-128 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883-38 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and Is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 18 ' � ■ | '\ ./ � , � � ` / � .J ` Date of January 200 | Samples Submitted: Decembe , 2003 • . .. Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B � Project: 01 EL.27482 / PCBs by EPA 8082 .-.i Date Extracted: 12-22'03 Date Analyzed: 12'24'03 . i Matrix: ......, Soil ' Units: mo/ko(pom) ( . .~. `� � -7 � -.~ Lab ID: 12'140-18 Client' ID: gP8@8' V A • { ._] 1 ] Result PQL ArooloriD1G: ND 0.053 -� Anxdor1221: ND 8.053 Aroclor1232: ND 0.053 \ Aroclor 1242: ND 0.053 � � � - Amu�r1248 ND 0.053 Aroclor 1254 ND 0.053 Aroclor 1260: ND 0.053 -~ • � Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits - 69 41-128 • Flags: i _J •! i _l 19 - OnSite Environmental, Ino. 14648NEE5 Street, Ftedmond, WA 98052(425)883-3881 This report penains perlairis to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain ot and is intended only for the use 01 Ihe indivdua or company 10 whom 1 is addressed. Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12 -22 -03 12 -24 -03 Lab ID: MB1222S1 iJ] i45L� .r�Sr'.4S 4' Matrix: . �✓. sysa.. 1. N. m+ NN. �.:.: JUa .��id�IwY2Y- vN.n.4w.viJ.'.lu -1, u. uc^ lalti4: aKY: dY.' AiLr. Y< I�1l� li:�:�1- '.�I...v1�.uw. -..+. Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) PCBs by EPA 8082 METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Result PQL Aroclor 1016: ND 0.050 Aroclor 1221: ND 0.050 Aroclor 1232: ND 0.050 Aroclor 1242: ND 0.050 Aroclor 1248: ND 0.050 Aroclor 1254: ND 0.050 Aroclor 1260: ND 0.050 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 81 41 -128 Flags: OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 20 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B „ Project: 01 EL.27482 PCBs by EPA 8082 MS/MSD QUALITY CONTROL Date Extracted: 12-22-03 Date Analyzed: 12-24-03 Matrix: Soil 71 Units: mg/kg (ppm) :.: . ,---. Lab ID: 12-140-18 1....i '. Spike Level: 0.500 ,., 7 l; J ' Percent Percent MS Recovery MSD RPD Recovery ..1 Aroclor 1260: 0.338 68 0.350 70 4 ,! „, . ••—..) • PQL 0.050 0.050 „. .. i Percent Percent Control „ ....., Surrogate Recovery Recovery Limits .,i Decachlorobiphenyl 61 64 41-128 i ...i Flags: , 1 -j ,••••••• f OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed, 21 • Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -24 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -29 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) TOTAL LEAD EPA 6010B 22 Client ID Lab ID Result PQL gp 3 @8' 12- 140 -06 27 5.9 gp 4 @4' 12- 140 -08 100 5.6 gp -8 @8' 12- 140 -18 15 5.3 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -2881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. i t- W J U O • Cl U) W J F- N LL w O!. g a' = d : F. z �-- O z t- U � D I— = U' Z U t- O I, z Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -1408 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 12 -24 -03 12 -29 -03 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB1224S1 Analyte Lead TOTAL LEAD EPA 6010B METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Method 6010B Result PQL ND 5.0 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3891 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 23 • • 1 • i • Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) • Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Lab ID: 12- 217 -02 Analyte Lead 12 -24 -03 12 -29 -03 TOTAL LEAD EPA 6010B _ �. DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL i Z , re 6 J U CO OQ W N u_ W O' a; d 2 W Sample Duplicate Z Result Result RPD Flags PQL Z 0 ND ND NA 5.0 0 0 W W: Z U; • Z tn ' 0 Z OnSlte Environmental, Inc. 14646 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 96052 (425) 802.3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 24 .raa.,,,.,.:._.•.:: e 1ma.,.+.1_ti4∎4".r 1.:: >w. Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 25 TOTAL LEAD EPA 6010B Z MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL 1 if- w• Date Extracted: 12 -24 -03 Date Analyzed: 12-29-03 _.1 0 0 u) 0: Matrix: Soil co w • w= . Units: mg /kg (ppm) CO u' iii Lab ID: 12- 217 -02 2 L Q d = W Spike Percent Percent 1•- _ Analyte Level MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags Z 1-. h- O Z 1—: Lead 250 222 89 228 91 3 ? m ! O co :O — w W , I- • U: u. 0'. w O -' 0 QnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95`x' Street, Redmond, WA 99052 (425) 083 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. s: tuJ..' wL";:< S3:« Ly. vL" tic ti•. iiJ* wr: i+ lal' i.'[ v: ilsui. 7,:: s4.ti;a:A±t::tisSv::w..w:a.�. >v.� u. ...a< Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 1 -5 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: Client ID: Aliphatic C8 -C10 Aliphatic 010 -C12 Aliphatic C12 -C16 Aliphatic C16 -C21 Aliphatic C21 -C34 Total Aliphatic Aromatic C8 -C10 Aromatic C10 -C12 Aromatic C12 -C16 Aromatic C16 -C21 Aromatic C21 -C34 Total Aromatic EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Flags: 12- 140 -06 GP 3 @ 8' Results PQL ND 12 ND 5.9 19 5.9 46 5.9 730 12 800 ND 35 ND 5.9 ND 5.9 20 5.9 130 12 150 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits o- Terphenyl 81 50 - 150 i- Chlorooctadecane 87 50 - 150 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 9 ' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3801 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use o1 the individual or company to whom it Is addressed. 26 7 7 j : Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: ' Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: Client ID: Aliphatic C8-C10 Aliphatic C10-C12 Aliphatic C12-C16 Aliphatic C16-C21 Aliphatic C21-C34 Total Aliphatic Flags: EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 12-16-03 1-5-04 12-140-18 GP-8 @ 8' Results PQL ND 11 ND 5.3 ND 5.3 14 5.3 860 11 870 Aromatic C8-010 ND 32 Aromatic C10-C12 ND 5.3 Aromatic C12-C16 ND 5.3 Aromatic C16-C21 9.9 5.3 Aromatic C21-C34 300 11 Total Aromatic 310 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits o-Terphenyl 78 50 - 150 1-Chlorooctadecane 84 50 - 150 OriSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 9511 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 27 4 Z < I -J 0 0 0 : 111 WE -J F- w 0 u_ "2 a Lu z I- z F— LU W. 0—i 0 : P (:) o Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB1216S1 Results PQL Aliphatic C8 -C10 ND 10 Aliphatic C10 -C12 ND 5.0 Aliphatic C12 -C16 ND 5.0 Aliphatic C16 -C21 ND 5.0 Aliphatic C21 -C34 ND 10 Total Aliphatic NA Aromatic 08 -010 ND 30 Aromatic C10 -C12 ND 5.0 Aromatic C12 -C16 ND 5.0 Aromatic C16 -C21 ND 5.0 Aromatic C21 -C34 ND 10 Total Aromatic NA Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits o- Terphenyl 99 50 - 150 1- Chlorooctadecane 89 50 - 150 Flags: EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL 12 -16 -03 1 -5 -04 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95"' Street, Redmond, WA 96052 (425) 885 - 38(11 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company 10 whom it is addressed. 28 Date of R January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12\2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HVDROCARBONS DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12-16-03 1-5-04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg/kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12-140-06 12-140-06 DUP 29 Results Results PQL RPD Aliphatic C8-010 ND ND 10 NA AiiphabcCiD'C12 ND ND 5.0 NA /8iohoUoC12'C1G 15.9 22.8 5.0 36 Aliphatic C16-C21 39 44 5.0 12 A)iphodicC21'C34 617 801 10 26 Aromatic 08-010 21.4 21.1 30 1 Aromatic ND ND 5.0 NA Aromatic C12-C16 ND ND 5.0 NA ArumaUcO1G{21 17.3 194 5.0 11 Aromatic C21-C34 107 153 10 35 Percent Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Recovery Limits o'Torphenyl 81 77 50 - 150 1'Chlorouciadouona 87 78 50 - 150 Flags: On5ko Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98O52(425 ) 888 This report pertains pertalns to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of arid is intended only for the use ot the individual or company to whom it is addressed. ~- 4 ^ Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Flags: EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS SPIKE BLANK QUALITY CONTROL 12 -16 -03 1 -5 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: SB1216S1 Spike Amount 100 mg /Kg (ppm) Percent Recovery 85 Results PQL Aliphatic C8 -C10 ND 10 Aliphatic C10 -C12 6.98 5.0 Aliphatic C12 -C16 23.1 5.0 Aliphatic C16 -C21 15.3 5.0 Aliphatic C21 -C34 ND 10 Total Aliphatic 45.4 Aromatic C10 -C12 ND 30 Aromatic C12 -C16 ND 5.0 Aromatic C16 -C18 9.69 5.0 Aromatic C18 -C21 10.4 5.0 Aromatic C21 -C28 19.9 10 Total Aromatic 40 Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits o- Terphenyl 89 50 - 150 1- Chlorooctadecane 91 50 - 150 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95"' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 30 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -8 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -01 Client ID: GP -1 @4' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene 0.027 0.0076 2- Methylnaphthalene 0.055 0.0076 1- Methylnaphthalene 0.037 0.0076 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0076 Acenaphthene 0.021 0.0076 Fluorene 0.022 0.0076 Phenanthrene 0.097 0.0076 Anthracene 0.018 0.0076 Fluoranthene 0.089 0.0076 Pyrene 0.12 0.0076 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.044 0.0076 Chrysene 0.081 0.0076 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.056 0.0076 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.038 0.0076 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.058 0.0076 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene 0.032 0.0076 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene 0.013 0.0076 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.046 0.0076 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 76 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 82 33 -100 Terphenyl -d14 89 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3581 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 31 = ��.:Yies4lis_ Z • Z C4 W' O - O w J -- • u_ w g u- = C� W Z � I– 0 Z !O ,C1 al I A u_ � — O .Z . W U = 0 I- Z t Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -03 Client ID: GP -2 @4' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0078 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0078 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0078 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0078 Acenaphthene ND 0.0078 Fluorene 0.014 0.0078 Phenanthrene 0.010 0.0078 Anthracene ND 0.0078 Fluoranthene ND 0.0078 Pyrene ND 0.0078 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0078 Chrysene ND 0.0078 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0078 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0078 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0078 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0078 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0078 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0078 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 64 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 70 33 - 100 i Terphenyl-d14 85 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95` Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 803-3631 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and Is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. -_ -- ., .. fb;. iauvi: tt; 3iaa:..�t1'..w.�l'E:.:«iz•:a:: 32 ■ J Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -04 Client ID: GP-2 @8' Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0090 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0090 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0090 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0090 Acenaphthene ND 0.0090 Fluorene ND 0.0090 Phenanthrene ND 0.0090 Anthracene ND 0.0090 Fluoranthene ND 0.0090 Pyrene ND 0.0090 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0090 Chrysene ND 0.0090 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0090 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0090 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0090 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0090 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0090 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0090 Surrogate : Nitrobenzene -d5 2- Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl -d14 PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Percent Control Recovery Limits 63 27 - 107 62 33 - 100 90 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -38811 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 33 •.efWSC�,;r. tu 1.. ien:41 r• ... u Y'.:y;ur..:.; _.1 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -05 Client ID: GP -3 @4' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0084 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0084 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0084 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0084 Acenaphthene 0.010 0.0084 Fluorene 0.030 0.0084 Phenanthrene 0.012 0.0084 Anthracene ND 0.0084 Fluoranthene ND 0.0084 Pyrene ND 0.0084 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0084 Chrysene ND 0.0084 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0084 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0084 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0084 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0084 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0084 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0084 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 59 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 69 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 89 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (4 25) 8£13 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 34 ; :r; 41./ .-' ;4.4uA.;14h4t t irz,' L: YSrJ. is:•'' �en aa.• rir..viaiGX:.i.i:.5�:.a sue': —J .-J Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1- 7 &8 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -17 Client ID: GP-7 @8' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene 2.3 0.95 2- Methylnaphthalene 75 0.95 1- Methylnaphthalene 78 0.95 --1 Acenaphthylene 0.35 0.0095 Acenaphthene 0.65 0.0095 �� Fluorene 3.3 0.95 Phenanthrene 1.4 0.95 Anthracene 0.11 0.0095 Fluoranthene 0.025 0.0095 Pyrene 0.032 0.0095 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0095 Chrysene 0.015 0.0095 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0095 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0095 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0095 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0095 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0095 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0095 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 - -- F 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl F 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 85 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 "' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 833.3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 35 44:!r }<: Y.L";a lei4:2:cxriteVA:L.na: j CaNliko.3A bb.YMi'i.+."SHGiC7r '3idac Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -19 Client ID: GP -9 @4' Compound: Results Flags PCIL Naphthalene ND 0.0078 ` I 2- Methylnaphthalene 0.012 0.0078 1- Methylnaphthalene 0.033 0.0078 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0078 Acenaphthene ND 0.0078 Fluorene ND 0.0078 Phenanthrene ND 0.0078 Anthracene ND 0.0078 Fluoranthene ND 0.0078 Pyrene ND 0.0078 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0078 ■ Chrysene ND 0.0078 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0078 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0078 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0078 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0078 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0078 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0078 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 68 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 68 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 75 55 - 106 PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM OrtSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 11 ' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - :3681 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 36 i:.' +, a::!^.%_::i'��;t 1,'.;Av:1.u: Z::.; °••lr; ,l't..eAi !dtv.`al.;r.K:kMUti:rY:::e,114� �a'bH1:h"J:E( ii•.ls Knlar«iasa f'• w�sY ik0P.P.V.V4,7 ,3.44.3.4., a. ce ,.W +. cum uw�pueu. i. 5a.: 1::: �' �i. oa: ss:: a:. x �di .L�eS.,el:sl�Ki,JFY,u.i:ai:?:. 9 Ufted�:fic. Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -8 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -21 Client ID: GP -9 @9' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0095 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0095 1- Methylnaphthalene 0.018 0.0095 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0095 Acenaphthene ND 0.0095 Fluorene ND 0.0095 Phenanthrene 0.017 0.0095 Anthracene ND 0.0095 Fluoranthene 0.021 0.0095 Pyrene 0.025 0.0095 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.010 0.0095 Chrysene 0.028 0.0095 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.011 0.0095 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0095 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.016 0.0095 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0095 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0095 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.0099 0.0095 Surrogate : Percent Control j . Recovery Limits UJ Nitrobenzene -d5 69 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 72 33 - 100 1 Terphenyl -d14 88 55 - 106 i _I OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.8581 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 37 Z � cc w JU O 0 0 . U) • I—. w 0. u_ 2 • d �w Z 1-0. Z h-- .UJ us 0 w W: H U; u- O w Z '0 H j Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: _ 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -22 Client ID: GP -10 @4' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0094 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0094 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0094 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0094 Acenaphthene ND 0.0094 Fluorene ND 0.0094 Phenanthrene ND 0.0094 Anthracene ND 0.0094 Fluoranthene ND 0.0094 Pyrene ND 0.0094 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0094 Chrysene ND 0.0094 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0094 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0094 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0094 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0094 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0094 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0094 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 70 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 68 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 83 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 38 &41,niw.,.142,4 :44)3, ',OA Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -23 Client ID: GP -10 @8' PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0079 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0079 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0079 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0079 Acenaphthene ND 0.0079 Fluorene ND 0.0079 Phenanthrene ND 0.0079 Anthracene ND 0.0079 Fluoranthene ND 0.0079 Pyrene ND 0.0079 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0079 Chrysene ND 0.0079 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0079 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0079 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0079 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0079 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0079 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0079 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 70 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 72 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 87 55 - 106 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 HE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 This report pertains to the samples analyzed In accordance with the chain of custody, and is Intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 39 ... , rrl �; wvi+ i; ti.` �r+'.: ntl>• iR7• �Kd; w�: Y:[:K: ttin�'+. i�9itX,`. c�saiav: twa: un. o) i. Ya +iu:3.alaiU�t�:�.i«ikY.aws�'s Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 1 -7 -04 Date Analyzed: 1 -7 -04 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: MB0107S1 PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Compound: Results Flags PQL Naphthalene ND 0.0067 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0067 1- Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0067 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0067 Acenaphthene ND 0.0067 Fluorene ND 0.0067 Phenanthrene ND 0.0067 Anthracene ND 0.0067 Fluoranthene ND 0.0067 Pyrene ND 0.0067 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0067 Chrysene ND 0.0067 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0067 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0067 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0067 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0067 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0067 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0067 Surrogate : Percent Control Recovery Limits Nitrobenzene -d5 84 27 - 107 2- Fluorobiphenyl 84 33 - 100 Terphenyl -d14 93 55 - 106 OrSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95"' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 40 1 -7 -04 1 -7 -04 Date of Report: January 8, 2004 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -140B Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg (ppm) Lab ID: 12- 140 -05 Compound: PAHs by EPA 8270C /SIM MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL RPD RPD Limit Flags Naphthalene 7 33 Acenaphthylene 0 24 Acenaphthene 10 27 Fluorene 21 26 Phenanthrene 23 32 Fluoranthene 5 43 Pyrene 5 31 Benzo[a]anthracene 4 22 Chrysene 2 24 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 8 23 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 4 23 Benzo[a]pyrene 5 24 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene 3 21 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2 18 41 Sample Spike Percent Percent Recovery Amount Amount MS Recovery MSD Recovery Limits Flags Naphthalene ND 0.0833 0.0819 98 0.0763 92 24 -111 Acenaphthylene ND 0.0833 0.0827 99 0.0829 99 25 -121 Acenaphthene 0.00756 0.0833 0.114 128 0.125 142 25 -113 V Fluorene 0.0235 0.0833 0.185 194 0.229 246 25 -133 V Phenanthrene 0.00965 0.0833 0.170 193 0.215 246 24 -137 V Fluoranthene ND 0.0833 0.0830 100 0.0874 105 23 -152 Pyrene ND 0.0833 0.0849 102 0.0889 107 31 -140 Benzo[a]anthracene ND 0.0833 0.0718 86 0.0748 90 30 -148 Chrysene , ND 0.0833 0.0801 96 0.0818 98 29 -142 Benzo[b]fluoranthene ND 0.0833 0.0776 93 0.0836 100 27 -151 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0833 0.0745 89 0.0776 93 27 -144 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0833 0.0759 91 0.0796 96 10 -162 Indeno(1,2,3- c,d)pyrene ND 0.0833 0.0754 90 0.0775 93 17 -159 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0833 0.0719 86 0.0732 88 19 -144 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.38B1 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only tor the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Z - OnSite Environmental Inc. ND - Not Detected at PQL PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference Data Qualifiers and Abbreviations A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS /MSD recovery data. B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample. C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are within five times the quantitation limit. E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range and is an estimate. F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds. G - Insufficient sample quantity for duplicate analysis. H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample preparation, and be impacting the sample result. I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits. J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate. K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeneity. The sample was re- extracted and re- analyzed with similar results. L - The RPD is outside of the control limits. M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene - napthalene) are present in the sample. 0 - Hydrocarbons outside the defined gasoline range are present in the sample. P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40. Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the control limits. S - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the necessary dilution of the sample. T - Th'e sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical U - The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. V - Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects. W - Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects. X - Sample extract treated with a silica gel cleanup procedure. Y - Sample extract treated with an acid cleanup procedure. OnSile Environmental, hic. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 42 • - .e- •..�wwi✓...uU nn.+n.i. HIV. ra• PR1} Fq�tGWFFMNOIrniiiKYL .1fU+6P'l3S.N�L6'. Environmental Inc. . F° T s< - ff �y 1.1548 PIE 951h Street •Redmond, WA 98052 o-21- i .A_ yr" ; R *&! � „ Laboratory Number: j 2- 1 4 a r'lione: (425) 8833881 • Fax. 425 885.4603 w 5 5 m d F— Z 'V x W t— co c� Q. t— Z c - .w v - _ _ co C m > N j CL * • g; Q m 2 J F- ' ~ '4-c 2 o Company: S «G/z - /, (Check One) i :. o d F— L l `. J: ;— m o co m . D U _ • ti > r -i: •;: _� "� o c N co 0 °' CV 17) >• v N F °' a' — ri E 2 (A t fa 7 _ • X w 0 ti co 1 0.. m 23 c0 - m 0- m �' v a) = 1 PI a -1 N c s m Z r. f— ,• s' 1, >.. W 2 , T > 1 s^; r v ` _ W . a!;3 -t ,.:� n r:''° Project Number: G z��U ❑ Same Day ❑ 1 Day 2/G • .. Project Name: ❑ 2 Day ❑ 3 Day 774: /v / /// Project Manager: ! XStandard (7 working days) /I1 5/r/ Sampled by: ❑ 4 '' °' y -1 1 - 4 A r� ,5 y 3b- ^r.,. - �� ^ , ;: txcc• .75 ...,. �5�"?,: ' , ,-,_ • r . » . ?l, _ Y - 7c. 4 ;:' ? sq x: Er ,. r . , n o z r •�jS r - a R to ! :f: tvh: .xi .< :; s t =i a . ;� 5 1 . ri " , r , r , =,'r ._ �.�q } tigr j ,_ ,,. n : �, y} i ` „�( _� r h • _ v w •r. ; r9 _.3� t �; � Iitl �ti�U6i'f .It.. r, a!-�t l�tl V� M it�l� (other) ,'F.' i . i �j �` �-'' « _ C r � ^t' OI HM . - - _ .1' "%.€ �It�S::._ fQ ?t 6 3P 1@ L/` 171703 ape; 5 / If 6 3Pl r o/ rz1 ?031 2p S / x. Y X. 3 r Z e -/' f7i ?03 6105 4 / K Y Y `: p z 6- t / t/7/7•o3 or/ 7 5 / "ft, y L �p 3 e Li ' 171/03 i a(7 ? / ` , 6, j P g /7-/7oi' /an / "c 0 0 0 0 r - , \ 7 P 3 17' Z17 /o /l 5 1 >' y yea `/ e '/r / / 4 4 0 0 0 6– \p -/ e 9' Z'i7't!'3 'l7'1' • r x_/ { -�, uE �� _ , z , , .j �'� ..,•. � .. ... -. F' ..i ,i •.... '...; 'may- G_J �.�.. �. . °' rfi T- t; ,::;• ; �.r S £;«.si = ak c ' T„ .. . i %. r : . r...„,:l -- 'k: •:�� ` '` r_'• -�• -. - ^ ; � �)�rt . ..±' .� -. • .........., , :. • �.y - ? 'R - , ?n =i�_. f r._- T.. - .e.,w^ti+c•b1 ..�.. F 9 ,,.�y� Y.� i -L" aiL.0 '-. ` ;y5'' + .TM' Ft a a'�'.1;!<.cL. �� Ni -�- ' ' . y.... r - 't. ._ -.~ mac =i _ _ - - - - _- ff•” L _ �.. .__..__- ._�......_L.�u.Y. - C..Wi•.T \\ ` _ Relinquished by � _J..��W t / '7 , , - _4. - f ` _ Received t "I�. � by ��'� Relinquished by Received by Relinquished by Received by Reviewed by /Date Reviewed by /Date ■ Chromatograms with final report ❑ wain of 1swJ DISTRIBUTION LEGEND: White - OnSite Copy Yellow - Report Copy Pink - Client Copy NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 3=' ti [� � ••M•V Environmental Inc. . yjy�pylril ■ / c Halogenated Volatiles by 8260B ' /PH I.}"I X Y 14648 NE 95Th Street • Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: (425) 883 -3881 • Fax: (425) 885 -4603 (Check One) ❑ Same Day Company: 7 -// 5/--7/z ❑ 2 Day Project No.: l •/CZ ? 7L /L; if WStandard (Hydrocarbon analyses: 5 days, Project Name: All other analyses: 7 days) Project Manager: ❑ o ._ ' , ; r I /. % /'l' G ;.`Aft-- , _ . r�� t ..,L,x r �,ry� "�'�N }�d �1c j'�i : :- a ,� '', ? -. yK�� ;.0III IC.1401 S - . =:." :. r,"u � . , .._. � �{{ 110 flit 'hi Ti'`S� 111 �1f i:-_- -;. ....�.. ' hifi Y._ ^ ,_. t` �.. : (other) a rr]] a 1 , � ^ ip � 0Ir1A n . S 011 ; ....�.+.. �Ly �` ;. - + - . 9�s Z// }/ $ (,' 8/ /7/7.7 // 3a /Z• /7C3 //31 / I / / z l -- c . -.I, / / /7/7'1 /Z• /7.0 /Za2 /zt5" IL( - & e 0 (s LCD 1G' rt1703 /r /U 5 / A !4 . s p- 7 tv c/7 17 /703 17 3 / A 1 ( AP a 7 Cry f b / - V + f)_ G' ` ` F * p • 1 71703 � 4763 /7 3 'Sal s 5 / / A .x 0 0 � V 0I f . .� 7f ' ( s « P - yd — 1zi ?05 ryr5 - r x ■ 3P-c` .. /'/? /yz / 2-7 f ey' 1( ( `)f /4ZO _- —1 1` A RELINQUISHED BY DATE ' 1 z ! Z v 3 BE -EI�VE __BY _ mss. -.. DATE (Z 7 ( �-� TIME 1 \ COMMENTS: Ji i - -1-..- `.. O ._ F },�,�� `� l � , FIRM TIME . r RELINQUISHED BY - DATE RECEIVED BY DATE FIRM TIME FIRM TIME REVIEWED BY DATE REVIEWED Chromatographs with final report ❑ Chain o Custoily DISTRIBUTION LEGEND: While - OnSite Copy Yellow - Report Copy Pink - Client Copy NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Page of Environmental Inc • 1.16 NE 95Ih Street • Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: (425) 883-3881 • Fax: (425) 885-4603 ziAiiimaii$01644itymr : 0.0046-?- (Check One) El Same Day El 1 Day D 2 Day El 3 Day ' g Standard A(1-1Nyodirhoecraarbnoanlyasensaly7sedsa:y5s)clays, Volatites by 82608 ii � `� Laboratory co ..0 o 0 a. ¢ - r 3 co -0 a) 1 `1" °-5- 1 ay < - 6 1— I II ,— En 1-1 o 2 '6 :- ;,-...- e_ No. 1 2 1 4 0 ':1; fti 3 Company: Project No.: 4 - 2 - 7 4 g ' Z Project Name: - Project Manager: / / 1-: 1 r (other) 4:12...i i • --1 7 - ,441 i kil I ki p i,...., 41 r ,,/ 7 / (....- c, ' 'Alfftiliii /i 3 ,. /5zr -r---1 A. !.-.•..a.. b x X . - . .. ,. .. RELINQUISH BY IA DATE ' _17/?O TIME R EIVECT-tY - ;JRL__ ___..._ DATE 1 TIME COMMENTS: FIRM I RELINQUISHED BY -:. DATE RECEIVED BY DATE - FIRM TIME FIRM TIME REVIEWED BY - 1. DATE REVIEWED . Chromatographs with final report 0 Chain of Custody DISTRIBUTION LEGEND: While - OnSile Copy Yellow - Report Copy Pink - Client Copy NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. LA L. T Page of L.J Li .LJ LJ LJ LJI LL.:1 LJ L_I _L 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEARTHAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 • (425) 883 -3881 December 22, 2003 Maureen Sanchez SECOR P.O. Box 230 Redmond, WA 98073 Re: Analytical Data for Project 01 EL.27482 Laboratory Reference No. 0312 -139 Dear Maureen: Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on December 12, 2003. The standard policy of OnSite Environmental Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me. David Baumeister Project Manager Enclosures OnSite Environmental Inc. OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14848 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Case Narrative Samples were collected on December 12, 2003, and received by the laboratory on December 12, 2003. They were maintained at the laboratory at a temperature of 2 ° C to 6 ° C. General QA/QC issues associated with the analytical data enclosed in this laboratory report will be indicated with a reference to a comment or explanation on the Data Qualifier page. More complex and involved QA/QC issues will be discussed in detail below. NWTPH Gx/BTEX (Water) Analysis The gasoline results for samples; gp -3, gp -4, gp -6, gp -7 and gp -8 are being impacted by the presence of diesel fuel. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. Benzene EPA 8260B Analysis The surrogate 4- Bromofluorobenzene is slightly outside control limits for sample gp -4 possibly due to coeluting compounds. Any other QA/QC issues associated with this extraction and analysis will be indicated with a footnote reference and discussed in detail on the Data Qualifier page. OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 93052 (425) 853 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 2 • ;AV . a,k;:xr.:WU.d ti:KSitL* • i - Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 93% 93% J Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -18 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -18 -03 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Client ID: gp gp - Lab ID: 12- 139 -01 12- 139 -02 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 Ethyl Benzene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 m,p- Xylene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 o- Xylene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 TPH -Gas ND 100 ND 100 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. VZEIU 3 Z re 2 . —1 C.) 0 0' co 0 co w J =' H � w w 0 ' <: co _a W Z F = . I— 0 Z I-: LLI 0O 0- 0 I—. = ill O li. Z' 0 !: O Z • Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -18 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -18 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX Client ID: gp -3 gp-4 Lab ID: 12- 139 -03 12- 139 -04 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 98% 114% Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 1.0 85 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 1.9 1.0 Ethyl Benzene ND 1.0 42 1.0 m,p- Xylene ND 1.0 2.3 1.0 o- Xylene ND 1.0 1.1 1.0 TPH -Gas 350 Z 100 2200 Z 100 OrSite Environrnental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 °i Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 833 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 4 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Client ID: Lab ID: 12 -18 -03 12 -18 -03 gp -5 12- 139 -05 NWTPH- GX /BTEX gp -6 12- 039 -06 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 1.0 660 50 Toluene ND 1.0 ND 5.0 Ethyl Benzene ND 1.0 47 5.0 m,p- Xylene ND 1.0 ND 5.0 o- Xylene ND 1.0 ND 5.0 TPH -Gas ND 100 2900 Z 500 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 94% 99% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is Intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 5 Z ~ w re g —I C.) 00 CO 0 tn W: •J1_' CO LL 11 . W W: 1— • U IL 0. Z • til O - ~ Z Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12.2DO3 Laboratory Reference: 0312-139 Project: 01EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12'18&19-03 Date Analyzed: 12-18&19-03 NVVTPH-GzG3TEX Matrix: Water Units: ug/L (ppb) Client ID: gp-8 Lab ID: 12-139-07 12-139-08 Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene 5.4 1.0 3.8 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 1O 2.1 1 O ND . Ethyl Benzene . � - m,p-Xylene 2.4 1.0 ND 1.0 1.7 1 D ND 1.0 o-Xylene . TPH-Gas 3500 Z 100 840 Z 100 96% 6 ' • 0nGKoEnvhnomonta|.Inc, 14648 Redmnd, WA 98052 (425) 863'3881 Tniu report noimsm the sampes analyzed in accordance wth the chain ofcustody and is intended only for the use of the Individual or company to whom It is addressed. Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -18 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -18 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Client ID: gp-9 Lab ID: 12- 139 -09 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX gp-10 12- 139 -10 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 98% 94 % Result Flags PQL Result Flags PQL Benzene 2.1 1.0 ND 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 Ethyl Benzene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 rn,p- Xylene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 o- Xylene ND 1.0 ND 1.0 TPH -Gas 110 100 ND 100 OnSite Eiwironmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883-3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 7 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -18 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -18 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Lab ID: MB1218W1 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 92% NWTPH- Gx /BTEX METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 Ethyl Benzene ND 1.0 rn,p- Xylene ND 1.0 o- Xylene ND 1.0 TPH -Gas ND 100 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 8 Z • 2 ;F w 00 (n 0' . = J �. w 0: w • 1— w Z I.. I— O' Z I—• .0 ;O 0H .20 w IU-- 21 0 Z '1 2 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -19 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -19 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Lab ID: MB1219W1 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 90% NWTPH- Gx /BTEX METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL Result Flags PQL Benzene ND 1.0 Toluene ND 1.0 Ethyl Benzene ND 1.0 m,p- Xylene ND 1.0 o- Xylene ND 1.0 TPH -Gas ND 100 CmSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. Z #_— Z cc 2 w. JU .00 U) 0 U) w. w =, w O. g tl Q = d' I— _ : Z F.. .I— O; Z I— 111 LIP U 0. :O =I 0 H.: 2 V 0. (/). Z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -18 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -18 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) NWTPH- Gx /BTEX DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL Lab ID: 12- 139 -01 12- 139 -01 Original Duplicate RPD Flags Benzene ND ND NA _a Toluene ND ND NA -. - -1 Ethyl Benzene ND ND NA m,p- Xylene ND ND NA o- Xylene ND ND NA TPH -Gas ND ND NA Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 93% 93% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed In accordance with the chain of custody, and is Intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 10 Z = Z ce w ¢¢= J U .0 0. .u) 0 w w al CO w, w O. _, 2 O w _, Z �. I—O` Z I— LU uj U0 • N , w W; Z u. O, u .i Z, N ' C) I O Z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01EL.27482 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Spike Level: 50.0 ppb Lab ID: Benzene 52.2 104 52.6 105 1 Toluene 49.3 99 50.2 100 2 Ethyl Benzene 50.3 101 51.0 102 1 m,p- Xylene 50.0 100 50.8 102 2 o- Xylene 50.0 100 50.8 102 2 Surrogate Recovery: Fluorobenzene 12 -18 -03 12 -18 -03 NWTPH- Gx /BTEX MS /MSD QUALITY CONTROL 97% 95% OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95`" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 11 12- 139 -01 Percent 12- 139 -01 Percent MS Recovery MSD Recovery RPD Flags • • Z Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 = Ce W= Date Analyzed: 12 -17 -03 2 JU 0 w o W = LL W° g ¢ co P H 1 ZF - . 1— O Z I— U O— ,0 1– __.. W i U Lube Oil Range: ND ND ND u O: PQL: 0.40 0.41 0.44 U Z. _, Identification: ~O I–` z Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Matrix: Units: Client ID: Lab ID: Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Flags: Water mg /L (ppm) GP -1 12- 139 -01 104% Y NWTPH -Dx GP-2 12- 139 -02 OnSite Environmental, Inc 14648 NE 95'' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. GP -3 12- 139 -03 Diesel Range: ND ND 0.55 --' PQL: 0.25 0.25 0.28 Identification: Diesel Fuel #1 91% 86% Y Y 12 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312-139 Pnojoct:U1EL.274O2 Date Extracted: 12'16'03 Date Analyzed: 12-17-03 Matrix: Water Units: mg/L (ppm) Diesel Range 3.5 PQL: 0.25 Identification: Diesel Fuel#1 NWTPH-Dx ND 0.26 Client ID: GP GP GP Lab ID: 12-139-04 12-139-05 12-139-06 Surrogate Recovery o-Terphenyl: 95% 89% 110% y y Y Flags: DnSito Environmental, imo. 14O4OWEQ5 Street, Redmond, VVA 95052(425) 886-3881 This report pertains pertairis to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of and is intended only for the use af the individual or company to whom 11 5 addressed. 6.6 0.25 Diesel Fuel#1 13 / Lube 011 Range: 0.51 ND ND | PQL: 0.40 0.42 0.40 Identification: Lube Oil Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -17 -03 Matrix: Water Units: mg /L (ppm) Client ID: Lab ID: Diesel Range: 10 2.1 PQL: 0.28 0.25 Identification: Diesel Fuel #1 Diesel Fuel #1 Lube Oil Range: 1.2 ND ND PQL: 0.45 0.40 0.41 Identification: Lube Oil Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: GP-7 12- 139 -07 97% • NWTPH -Dx GP -8 12- 139 -08 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95'" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3681 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. GP -9 12- 139 -09 ND 0.26 102% 93% Flags: Y Y Y 14 r =.60..Y:i�..�. 1•�%+'SNf:1+s:.'Ybi?+:� 44: J.v u12�r NWTPH -Dx Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -17 -03 Matrix: Water Units: mg /L (ppm) Client ID: Lab ID: Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: Lube Oil Range: PQL: Identification: Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Flags: GP -10 12- 139 -10 ND 0.25 ND 0.40 97% Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14649 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 15 • 1 ' wC� ;.'Ji`,Ia;VV+.iR�.wlY'::+wa! •t.d.lw.Uwrw.xWu ilSiaY'hL'r "iliYiau' '�'L�s'wn�i�..l�;a�` Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -16 -03 i Matrix: Water Units: mg /L (ppm) Lab ID: MB1216W1 Diesel Range: PQL: Identification: Lube Oil Range: PQL: Identification: Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: Flags: NWTPH -Dx METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL ND 0.25 ND 0.40 99% Y OrnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883 - 3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 16 4a1+ „, t.lf.fY�s.:nlYiw�we�Ft • Date Analyzed: 12 -17 -03 Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -16 -03 Matrix: Water Units: mg /L (ppm) Lab ID: Diesel Range: ND PQL: 0.25 RPD: N/A NWTPH -Dx DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL 12- 139 -10 12- 139 -10 DUP ND 0.25 Surrogate Recovery o- Terphenyl: 97% 101% Flags: Y Y OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95'" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 883.3081 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 17 ': aY ,yis-rL::2ti.uF:CvsSx'a'��KtLJ: ' :.vc`.+.:ii.i z d CC 2 .6 •U 0 CO ico =. • u -i W o. 1 a: F=- _ z �; Z i-,. LLI s m . H U` !ll z . O z ( 1 • Compound Results Flags PQL Benzene 96 1.0 ntiw.trS >:tirt= iil:.J' }asti,Y:: :tl:3:ia:i:C- .atv: +.u�,:ro: Date of Report: December 22, 2003 Samples Submitted: December 12, 2003 Laboratory Reference: 0312 -139 Project: 01 EL.27482 Date Extracted: 12 -19 -03 Date Analyzed: 12 -19 -03 Matrix: Water Units: ug /L (ppb) Lab ID: 12- 139 -04 Client ID: gp-4 BENZENE by EPA 8260B Percent Control Surrogate Recovery Limits Dibromofluoromethane 109 80 -120 Toluene, d8 110 80 -120 4- Bromofluorobenzene 121 Q 80 -120 OnSite Environmental, Inc. 14648 NE 95 Street, Redmond WA 98052 (425) 883 -3881 This report pertains to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody, and is intended only for the use of the individual or company to whom it is addressed. 18 Z w 0 00 u) 0 m w: J Z F-- U) u - ' w O ▪ Q co z a w , Z Z'. 1- 0 Z i— UO 'O Di E- . 11J Z . UY 111 0 F- Z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Logged By: 1). Johnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORMER 7- ELEVEN 274/12 'rUKWILA,WASHIN( ;ioN Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: GP -1 See "Legend to Logs" for sampling method, classifications and laboratory testing methods Boring Diam.(in.): 2 Surface Elev.(11.): Groundwater Depth (ft.): SZ 8 Total Depth (f.): 12.0 Drive wt.(Ibs.): 140 Drop Dist.(in.): 30 Boring A bandonment ( • 1 da Sample Interval Description GId SAMPLE 6 G 6 1 5 6 C E G G / 1 5 6 C 5 Hydrated Bentonite Chips p 5— l0 15— 20— — — . • Silty SAND (SM); gray, very loose, fine grained sand. NT NT GP -I5, 4 GP-I — R✓� Silty CLAY with SAND (SC); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with depth, sand is line grained. CLAY (CL); gray, saturated, medium soft. - — _ _ _ f GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. • SCREEN SET 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. Notes: Steady raining conditions made assessment of clay moisture content difficult. Slow groundwater entry into probe. The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant Material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. Z x 0 0 m 1- SECOR huernational Incnriumned Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -1 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) r `4 ..4 044 4o:N .1.Fiil.N. Logged By: 1)..lol1tson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORMER 7- ELEVEN 27482 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: GP -2 See "Legend to Logs" Ibr sampling method, classifications and aboratory testing methods Boring Diam.(in.): 2 Surface Elev.(ft.): Groundwater Depth (ft.): SZ 8 Total Depth (ft.): 12.0 Drive wt.(Ibs.): 140 Drop Dist.(iii ): 30 Boring Abandonment .:-.1 . Q -Ea C y d c f/) Description a — = L E E E r E r E C 6 1 E 1 6 E E E E E i E Hydrated Bentonite Chips 5— 10— 15 20 — — — R • Silty SAND (SM); gray, very loose, fine grained sand, odor nosed. N T NT cP -2rf4 ' GP -2RIV — — R :•,'.' Silty SAND with CLAY (SM); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with depth, sand is fine grained, odor noted. CLAY (CL); gray, saturated, soft to medium. _ _ — — _ _ _ j j I i 2 2 GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. Note: Site conditions, 2 -3 inclis of standing water on ground surface. Slow groundwater production. The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual/manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. SECOR International Incorporated Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -2 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) Logged 13y: 1)..Iohnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORMER 7- ELEVEN 27482 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: GP-3 See "Legend to Logs" for sampling method, classifications and laboratory testing methods 13( ring Dial i.(in.): Surftice Elev.(ft.): Groundwater Depth (0.): Q 12 Total Depth (ft.): 16.0 Drive wt.(Ibs.): 140 Drop DisL(in.): 30 Boring Abandonment Cu) 't daQ f �en�alu� ai dweS 1 Description QId SAMPLE 6 G i E G 1 G G G G i 6 r E I i G 6 E E i 6 i i G Hydrated I3entonite Chips o 5 —depth, 10 15 20 — — 1' Silty SAND (SM); gray, damp, loose, fine grained, IOpwr NT NT GPar,,;a' GP -3(itW GP-3@12' _ 4 _ 4 NV 9 Silty CLAY with SAND (SC); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with sand is fine grained. _ _ — , CLAY (CL); gray, saturated, soft. — — _ — _ GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 16 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET 12 TO 16 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. Note: Good groundwater production. The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. SECOR International Imam ;rated Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -3 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) za asu.r:„a�+$ref +r'=•k •iirtr441:t -w : .a;3:s+.s: a.;rw 1 Logged 13y: D. Johnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/1 2/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORDMER 7- ELEVEN 27482 TUKWILA,WASIIINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE 13oring Number: GP -4 See "Legend to Logs" for l3oring Surface Groundwater Depth (II.): Total Drive Drop sampling method, Diain.(in.): Elcv.(ft.): SZ 12 Depth (I1.): wt.(Ibs.): Dist.(in.): classifications and laboratory testing methods 2 l (i.0 140 30 Boring SAMPLE Abandonment Depth. Sample 1 Description lId 6 . Silty SAND (SM); gray, damp, loose, fine grained, G E I G 6 i — ' 7 pp"1 GP -4(T4' 6 Hydrated Silty SAND with CLAY (SM); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with 6 Bentonite G i c Chips depth, sand is fine grained. 6 6 • 6 NT GP -l(;R' G j 6 � CLAY (CL); gray, saturated, soft to medium soft. 6 6 10— 6 C C Q _ j G NT GP- 4(�7�12. G G 5 ri 15 — - GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 16 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. — SCREEN SET FROM 12 TO 16 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or tines. r u. 0 •1 SECOR InlemMiona! Incorporated Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -4 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) Logged By: D. Johnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORMER 7- ELEVEN 27482 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: Gr -s Sec "Legend to Logs" for sampling method, classifications and laboratory testing methods 13 wing Dial i.(in.): 2 Surface Elev.(ft.): Groundwater Depth (f.): Q 8 Total Depth (ft.): 12.0 Drive wt.(Ibs.): 140 Drop Dist.(in.): 30 Boring Abandonment Depth. (ft.) Sample Interval Description 1 QId • SAMPLE 6 I E E c c 6 6 6 G r E G 6 r E E I E 6 5 r _ C r Hydrated Bentonite Chips 5— 2 10- 15 20— _ — — R Silty SAND (SM); gray, loose, damp, fine grained sand, no odor. NT NT GP-560 GP•5gH' — — •. SAND (SP); gray, damp, medium grained sand, no odor. - _ — _ GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET FRON 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. Notes: Good producing well groundwater clearly at 8 feet below ground surface. The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. V/ 0 z 0 x m r� 0 0 0 r ri SECOR International Incorporated Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 iFF :e..— .w w'�*'w•w:w,.... �..w:: Log of Boring: GP -5 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) Logged 13y: I). Johnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCA DE DRILLING Project Name: ro►tn 7- ELEVEN 274112 TUKWILA,'WASHINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: Cl' -6 Sec "Legend to Logs" for sampling method, classifications and Iabo :atory testing methods Boring Diam.(in.): 2 Surface Elev.(fl.): Groundwater Depth (ft): .S/ 12 Total Depth (ft.): 16.(1 Drive wt.(Ibs.): 140 Drop Dist.(in.): 30 Boring Abandonment Cu) 'yldaU 1E.Ualuj aidums _ Description 1 QId SAMPLE II E 6 6 6 I 6 E E C 5 G C G 6 6 6 E 1 E E 6 6 6 6 6 6 Hydrated Bentonite Chips 5 - I0 15— — — • — • Silty SAND (SM); gray, damp, loose, fine grained, . ( irop"i NT NT op•er<na' op•ert:xe OP4a I2' X .:'. — — ' Silty SAND with CLAY (SM); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with depth, sand is very fine grained. — - 1 j /, Silty CLAY (CL); gray, saturated, soft. - _ — GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 16 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET FROM 12 TO 16 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. SECOR Intonational !nc•urlrnmted Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -6 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) Logged By: D. Johnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORMER 7- ELEVEN 27482 T[JI:NI LA, WASHINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: GI' -7 See "Legend to Logs" for sampling method, classifications and laboratory testing methods Boring Diam.(in.): 2 Surface Elev.(li.): Grounthvater Depth (11.): SZ 8 Total Depth (ft.): 12.0 Drive wt.(Ibs.): 140 Drop Dist.(in.) 30 Boring `° C „ w Abandonment cl = a cf Description o .- an V) Silty SAND (SM); brown, damp, loose, fine grained, strong odor. E _ 6 c 1 drated — 73Pro„ arar4a' Silty CLAY with SAND (SC); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with 1 Bentonite E Chips j— depth, sand is very fine grained, strong odor. E 6 6 G V NT crarnx' E i i 10— _ / E GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. _ SCREEN SET FROM 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. 1$ Note: _ Good producing well. 20— I 7 — ) ) The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific ; location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. u SECOR International I n cm porated Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -7 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) Logged 13y: D Dates Drilled: D Drilling Contractor P Project Name: M Method /Equipment: B Boring Number: Sec "Legend to Logs" Ibr 1 13 wing S Surface G Groundwater Depth (11..): T Total D Drive D Drop Boring Abandonment Cu) btlidaQ I Sample Interval 1 Description 1 QId . SAMPLE I ' E B B e n unit S — I ' i GRAVEL (GP); 1111 material not native. NT G GP•H 6114' X N — . Silty SAND (SM) gray, moist, loose, slight odor. _Z , GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET FROM 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SECOR Intentnliannl 1 n cotporated Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/1 Log of Boring: GP -8 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) Logged By: D. Johnson Dates Drilled: 12/12/03 12/12/03 Drilling Contractor CASCADE DRILLING Project Name: FORMER 7- ELEVEN 27482 rr;r wiLA, WASHINGTON Method /Equipment: GEOPROBE Boring Number: GP -9 See "Legend to Logs" for Boring Surface Groundwater Depth (ft): Total Drive Drop sampling method, Diam.(in.): Elev.(ft.): Q 8 Depth (ft.): Dist.(in.): classifications and laboratory tcstin methods 2 12.0 30 Boring SAMPLE Abandonment Depth. I a1dureS Description 11d r Silty SAND (SM); damp, loose, fine grained sand. G 6 r 6 r 0 Hydrated R NT GP-9(1,44' Silty SAND with CLAY (SM); gray, saturated, loose, no odor. C Bentonite E Chips 5 __ 6 r • G E r NT GP-9RK' e G r 6 E 10— E r I E r • _ GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET FROM 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. 15 — Note: _ Better producing well. 20 — The substrata descriptions above are generalized representations and based upon visual /manual classification of cuttings and /or samples obtained during drilling. Predominant material types shown on the log may contain different materials and the change from one predominant material type to another could be different than indicated. Descriptions on this log apply only at the specific location at the time of drilling and may not be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. h z a 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 r- rl SECOR International Jncorpornued Project No. 01 EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -9 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) r: wr.. nt; �r ,.:r..,..tus:.wsacw,sc:.tctiSfr ` �au xS:: 4TO` c". A..' t,+, t.: 4. 7ai3 ::�kia»4fa^,o.^.::'�':elutr.a'� •ia:i:sd tit "le+3�1:.ZL•.ib'v:.;�bJ4+i::w Logged By: D Dates Drilled: D Drilling Contractor P Project Nanie: M Method /Equipment: B Boring Number: See "Legend to Logs" for B Boring S Surface G Groundwater Depth (ft.): T Total D Drive D Drop Boring Abandonment Cu) 'gidaa Sample Interval Description QId SAMPLE I H y dra ted � 5 — d _ Silty SAND (SM); gray, damp, loose, fine grained, no odor. NT G GP-11111;4' H — . �� Silty CLAY with SAND (SC); gray, damp, silt and clay content increase with — , GEOPROBE TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SCREEN SET FROM 8 TO 12 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. SECOR International lncorf) gated Project No. 01EL.27482.03 Date 1/19/04 Log of Boring: GP -10 Approved by (sheet 1 of 1) • 0o cn r m NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 1 Sample Identification .... Dale Depth (feet bps). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons .: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) .� - .. - ... Semivoiatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) .. .. Lead TPH-G ..... TPH-D .. TPH -O .. Benzene .. T oluene ....__., Ethylbenzene 'Total_ Methylene _...... ..... XYlenies 'Chicride -Total .NAPH ACEN .. .�.: ACE FLUOR -- PHEN ANTH ......: FLUORA .. Pyrene .. B(a)A I CHRY B(b)F_ . k S(k)F B(e)F. 1(1 c.d}P D(a,h )A B(g, h,l)P GP1(El4' 12/12/2003 4 <11 230 550 <0.023 <0.11 <0.11 <0.22 - 0.12 <0.0076 0.021 0.022 0.097 0.018 0.089 0.12 0.044 0.081 0.056 0.038 0.058 0.032 0.013 0.046 - 1 GP1(a)8' 12/12/2003 8 <14 <35 <70 <0.028 <0.14 <0.14 <0.28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP2P4' 12/12/2003 4 <12 <29 <59 <0.024 <O.12 <0.12 <0.24 - <0.023 <0.0078 <0.0078 0.014 0.010 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.007E <0.007E <0.007E <0.007E<0.007E <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.0078 - GP2r@8' 12/12/2003 8 <14 <34 <68 <0.027 <0.14 <0.14 <028 - <0.027 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.009C <0.009C <0.009C <0.009C <0.009C <0.0090 <0.0090 <0.0090 - GP3a(94' 12/12/2003 4 <13 94 300 <0.025 <0.13 <0.13 <0.26 - <0.025 <0.0084 0.010 0.030 0.012 <0.0084 <0.0084 <0.0084 < 0. 0084 <0.00B4<0.008' <0.0084 <0.0084 <0.0034 <0.0084 <0.0084 - GP3 n 8' 12/12/2003 8 <12 <150 1,800 <0.024 <0.12 <0.12 <0.24 0.0094 (H) 0.38 <0.078 0.38 0.24 1.3 0.26 1.4 1.1 0.36 0.47 0.27 0.25 0.30 0.16 <0.078 0.20 27 GP3(g12' 12/12/2003 12 130 (Z) 150 430 <0.012 <0.061 0.071 022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP4(aY4' 12/12/2003 4 450 (2) 150 2,200 0.082 0.21 <0.11 0.55 <0.028 <0.222 <0.074 <0.074 <0.074 0.22 <0.074 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.16 0.097 <0.074 0.13 100 GP4(68' 12/12/2003 8 <6.0 1,300 710 <0.012 <0.060 <0.060 <0.12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP4(9 12' 12/12/2003 12 86 (Z) 1,600 110 0.053 <0.068 0.13 0.12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP5 8(74' 12/12/2003 4 38(Z) 66 410 0.022 <0.061 0.26 0.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP5(58' 12/12/2003 8 <12 310 860 <0.023 <0.12 <0.12 <0,24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP6(a)4' 12/12/2003 4 3,200 (Z) 6,500 280 1.6 <1.3 8.1 9.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP6@8' 12/12/2003 8 <11 <27 <54 <0.022 <0.11 <0.11 <0,22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP6 8@12' 12/12/2003 12 23 (Z) 37 <68 0.33 <0.068 0.085 <0.14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP7p4' 12/12/2003 4 <12 <30 <60 <0.024 <0.12 <0.12 <0.24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP7(a28' 12/12/2003 8 1,300(Z) 25,000 <710 0.030 <0.071 0.46 1.2 - 155 0.35 0.65 3.3 1.4 0.11 0.025 0.032 <0.0095 0.015 <0.0095<0.0095<0.0095 <0.0095 <0.0095 <0.0095 - GP8(/8' 12/12/2003 8 <11 <130 2,200 <0.021 <0.11 <0.11 <0.22 0.015(H) <0.213 <0.071 <0.071 <0.071 0.13 <0.071 <0.071 0.15 0.19 0.71 0.17 <0.071 0.14 <0.071 0.083 0.16 15 GP9(8 4' 12/12/2003 4 <12 <29 <59 <0.024 <0.12 <0,12 <0.24 - 0.045 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0,0078 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0. 007E <0.007E<0.0076<0.0076 <0.0076 <0.0078 <0.0078 <0.0078 - GP9@8' 12/12/2003 8 <13 <31 110 <0.025 <0.13 <0.13 <0.26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GP9(al9' 12/12/2003 9 <7.1 <36 880 <0.014 <0.071 <0.071 <0.14 - 0.018 <0.0095 <0.0095 <0.0095 0.017 <0.0095 0.021 0.025 0.010 0.028 0.011 <0.0095 0.016 <0.0095 <0.0095 0.0099 - GP10(5/4' 12/12/2003 4 <14 <36 <71 <0.028 <0.14 <0.14 <0.28 - <0.0282 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.009:<0.0094<0.0091<0.0094<0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 <0.0094 - GP10(4 8' 12/12/2003 8 <6.0 <30 <60 <0.012 <0.060 <0.060 <0.12 - <0.0237 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0. 007 6 <0.0075<0.0076, <0.0078,<0.0075 <0.0079 <0.0079 <0.0079 - MTCA Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses 1 30 2000 _ 2000 0.03 7 6 9 0.02 5 - z 4800 = 3200 - _ 24000 _ 3200 _ 2400 0.1 • 0.1 • 0.1 • 0.1 • 0.1 • 0.1 • 0.1 • - 250 Table 1 Soll Sample Analytical Results All results and cleanup levels presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) NOTES: BOLD = Results exceed MTCA Method A Sol Cleanup Levels hgs = Below ground surface TPH -G = Total petroleum hydrocarbons In the gasoline range. by Ecology Method YYTPH -Gx TPH -D = Total petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range. by Ecology Method WYTPH•Ox TPH -O = Total petroleum hydrocarbons b the ai lenge, by Ecology Method WTPH -Dx VOCs = benzene. toluene. ethylbenzene, and total xylenes by EPA Method 80216, other VOC< analyzed by EPA Method 8260 SVOCs Lead = Total NAPH = ALEN = ACE = FLUOR = PHEN = ANTH = FLUORA = B(a)A = 11 = Z = MTCA = 1= 2= R tetSne.11 V 11ISO.e 03 ...tontine eh CHRY = CMysone B(b)F = Benzo(b) Fluorenlhene B(k)F = Benzo(k) Fluoraniheno BlelP = Benzo(e) Pyrene I(1,2,3c,d)P = Indeno (1,2,3•c,d) Pyrene D(a,h)A = Dibenz (0,6) Anflracene B(g•h.i)P = Benzo (g,hi) Perylene Only defected onelyles are tabulated. by EPA Method 8270 /5IM by EPA Method 60108 total of naphthalene, 1- methylnaphlholene. and 2- melhylnephlhalene Acenaphthytene Acenophlhano Fluorene Phenantlrene Antivecene Fluorenthrene Benzo(a)Anllracene not analyzed Amity(' indicated Ise common laboratory solvent and may have been Introduced during sample preporelbn. gasoline results are being influenced by the presence of diesel fuel. Model Toxics Control Act Gasoline mixtures without benzene and where the total of ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene ere less than 114 of the gasoline mixture have a cleanup level of 100 mg /kg: ell other mixtures are 30 mg/kg Not Method A Cleanup Level is established. Method B level based on d contact pathway is presented, if /wobble The cleanup level for these compounds in the sum of the corcentrotion of each compound multiplied by is toxicity equivalency factor relative 10 benza(a)pyrene, as presented M CLARC version 3.1. Page 1 of 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Sample Identification Date TPH-G TPH -D TPH -O Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes GP -1 12/12/2003 <100 <250 <400 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 GP -2 12/12/2003 <100 <250 <410 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 GP -3 12/12/2003 350 (Z) 550 <440 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 GP -4 12/12/2003 2,200 (Z) 3,500 510 85/96 1.9 42 3.4 GP -5 12/12/2003 <100 <260 <420 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 GP -6 12/12/2003 2,900 (Z) 6,600 <400 660/700 <5.0 47 <10.0 GP -7 12/12/2003 3,500 (Z) 10,000 1,200 5.4 <1.0 2.1 4.1 GP -8 12/12/2003 840 (Z) 2,100 <400 3.8/4.4 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 GP -9 12/12/2003 110 <260 <410 2.1 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 GP -10 12/12/2003 <100 <250 <400 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 MTCA Method Cleanup A Groundwater Levels 1,000/800 500 500 5 1,000 700 1,000 Table 2 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results All concentrations presented in micrograms per liter (pg /I) R:1Staff17- 111274821Dec 03 analytical tables.xls NOTES: BOLD = Results exceed MTCA Method A Soil Cleanup Levels pg /I = Micrograms per liter TPH -G = Total petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range TPH -D = Total petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range TPH -O = Total petroleum hydrocarbons in the oil range z = Gasoline results are being influenced by the presence of diesel fuel 85 / 96 = Benzene results by EPA 8021 / confirmation by EPA 8260B MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act 1 = Gasoline mixtures without benzene have a cleanup level of 1,000 pg /I; when benzene is present, the cleanup level is 800 pg /I Page 1 of 1 __. 1 _ __ -__ -. i I _._. _ I 1 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR1HAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Sample Identification Date Depth (feet bgs) Carcinogenic Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sum of TEF - adjusted Concentrations Benzo(a)Anihracene Chrysend Benzo(b) Fluoranthene Benzo(k) Fluoranthene Benzo()Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3 -c,d )Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Value/PQLI Flag TEF Value /PQLI Flag TEF Value/PQL Flag .TEF Value /PQL Flap TEF. Value/POLIFIag ..TEF Value/PQLI Flag 1 TEF Value /PQL Flag TEF GP1 @4' 12/12/2003 4 0.044 0.1 0.081 0.01 0.056 0.1 0.038 0.1 0.058 1.0 0.032 0.1 0.013 0.4 0.08 GPI @8' 12/12/2003 8 -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - GP2@4' 12/12/2003 4 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 0.01 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 1.0 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 0.4 0.01 GP2 @8' 12/12/2003 8 0.009 U 0.1 0.009 U 0.01 0.009 U 0.1 0.009 U 0.1 0.009 U 1.0 0.009 U 0.1 0.009 U 0.4 0.02 GP3 @4' 12/12/2003 4 0.0084 U 0.1 0.0084 U 0.01 0.0084 U 0.1 0.0084 U 0.1 0.0084 U 1.0 0.0084 U 0.1 0.0084 U 0.4 0.02 GP3 @8' 12/12/2003 8 0.36 0.1 0.47 0.01 0.27 0.1 0.25 0.1 0.30 1.0 0.16 0.1 0.078 U 0.4 0.44 GP3 @12' 12/12/2003 12 -- - - - -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- GP4 @4' 12/12/2003 4 0.13 0.1 0.16 0.01 0.15 0.1 0.12 0.1 0.16 1.0 0.097 0.1 0.074 U 0.4 0.24 GP4@8' 12/12/2003 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- - - -- -- - GP4 @12' 12/12/2003 12 -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - GP5 @4' 12/12/2003 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- - - - GP5 @ 8' 12/12/2003 8 -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - GP6@4' 12/12/2003 4 -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- GP6@8' 12/12/2003 8 -- -- -- - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - GP6@12' 12/12/2003 12 - -- - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- - GP7 @ 4' 12/12/2003 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- GP7@8' 12/12/2003 8 0.0095 U 0.1 0.015 0.01 0.0095 U 0.1 0.0095 U 0.1 0.0095 U 1.0 0.0095 U 0.1 0.0095 U 0.4 0.02 GP8 @8' 12/12/2003 8 0.19 0.1 0.71 0.01 0.17 0.1 0.071 U 0.1 0.14 1.0 0.071 U 0.1 0.083 0.4 0.23 GP9 @4' 12/12/2003 4 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 0.01 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 1.0 0.0078 U 0.1 0.0078 U 0.4 0.01 GP9 @8' 12/12/2003 8 - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- GP9@9' 12/12/2003 9 0.010 0.1 0.028 0.01 0.011 0.0095 U 0.016 1.0 0.0095 U 0.0095 U 0.4 0.02 GP10 @4' 12/12/2003 4 0.0094 U 0.1 0.0094 U 0.01 0.0094 U 0.1 0.0094 U 0.1 0.0094 U 1.0 0.0094 U 0.1 0.0094 U 0.4 0.02 GP10 @8' 12/12/2003 8 0.0079 U 0.1 0.0079 U 0.01 0.0079 U 0.1 0.0079 U 0.1 0.0079 U 1.0 0.0079 U 0.1 0.0079 U 0.4 0.01 MTCA Method Levels for Unrestricted A Soil Cleanup Land Uses 0 • Table 3 Calculation of TEF- adjusted Carcinogenic Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations All results and cleanup levels presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) NOTES: BOLD = Results exceed MTCA Method A Soil Cleanup Levels bgs = Below ground surface POL = Practical quantilation limit. The POL is the reporting limit provided by the laboratory. TEF = toxicity equivalency factor from CLARC, version 3.1, published by the Washington State Department of Ecology U = not detected greater than indicated POL - = not analyzed MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act = The cleanup level for the compounds listed on this table is the sum of the concentration of each compound multiplied by its toxicity equivalency factor relative to benzo(a)pyrene, as presented in CLARC version 3.1. R:lShtv7- 1r1274870Y 03 analy0Cal Uhles.lds Page 1 of 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 1 :__i ) 1 I H Li LJ Li -n G) rn 0) 1 L_I 'NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEARtHAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT rhiws . , l 1 Foo MIT !ME MIEWN I DYIJ !P4 �g 1 61 alt.' A r A North 1 1/2 0 SCALE (MILES) 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 H H H WASHINGTON SCALE (FEET) REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE; DES MOINES, WASHINGTON; 1995 1 I . ov s 1t. 12034 134th COURT NE, SUITE 102 REDMOND. WASHINGTON PH (425) 372.1600 /FAX (425) 372 -1650 PREPARED FOR: FORMER 7- ELEVEN FACILITY NO. 27482 14221 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JOB NUMBER: 01 EL.27482.03 DRAWN BY: S. SIMMONS SITE LOCATION MAP CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: FIGURE: 1 DATE: 12/15/03 FILEPATH: tip�Mi'P,s ^r.yY1 •s a2:�•:r - ..:rp:.. .,t.� .�.+; PATH ON LEFT °11 • 1-1 et) • • O th.) O th.) c"\ NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. raMEMVIIIIIIMIIIIIVM M ...1 1111 (NINTH IIMMIIIMBERMIDERI ilMINKCI NMIMiB RVIIPMiCimm i. l ..... ■ 0 LEGENQ - — SITE BOUNDARY I5-I FIRE HYDRANT 30 • GP -10 4- GEOPROBE LOCATION (SECOR) ♦ 1' -r; --` FORMER SAMPLE LOCATION C \ / SAMPLE ID TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS GASOUNE TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS f1IFSFI TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS OIL TPHg TPHd TPHo B T E SAMPLE DEPTH BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYL BFN7FNE TOTAL XYLENES B(o1P BENZENE (a) PYRENE NOTE: SAMPLE COLLECTED ON DECEMBER 12, 2003. 60 APPROXIMATE SCALE (FEET) = NOT ANALYZED ALL RESULTS ARE IN MIWGRAMS PER KILOGRAM (mg /kg) . • 12034 134th COURT NE, SUITE 102 REDMOND, WASHINGTON PH (425) 372 - 1600 /FAX (425) 372 -1650 EP -6 FORMER PUMP (SANDS GP -2 JOB NUMBER: 01 EL.27482.03 a, <P ) EP - 2 DRAWN BY: razrunsmommvido liarIWTAIMIIMIIM1111 tom •• W IIIIIII111ii YMKIII'•1MI1 MIN 11111�I It�it[�IC11i[! o, v MOVINEUR iT . •'ICi1011 iICl'MU s GP\ ■ \ ♦ / <` EP 5 \•,,o GP-6‘ ■ G . p(30 ; • O EP -4 GP 5 I O EP -1 FORMER TANK1 GP -3 BASIN � ) C�Ittl��l�if� ifJ: G1 Ci 1 Ci �!i i�7 i kT> t MUM WZ!c4L 1'JEF1711 iiLtliMLL•7i`] • • — 1C�•]ilCIL I • RAl2,4M, , , m 1�lttii�li�li ilC1•'AC�•1i[1 • , = MM!M : :Ct•7R! FT: r1T2MYTIIIIIIINIMIII i \ / v PREPARED FOR: FORMER 7- ELEVEN FACILITY NO. 27482 14221 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Z S. SIMMONS FILEPATHR: \CAD\CAD .SILES \ PROJECTS \7 ELEVEN \271.82 \27482(SP).DWG MODIFIED BY SSIMMONS AT JAN 22, 2001. - 13:18 GP-7 ♦ EP -8 GP -9 CHECKED BY: GP-8 ♦ GP SITE PLAN WITH SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS APPROVED BY: NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. FIGURE: 3 DATE: 12/15/03 PATH ON LEFT 0 / ♦ CATCH BASIN 15-1 FIRE HYDRANT 30 I FGEND •— — — — SITE BOUNDARY ■ GP -10 -4- GEOPROBE LOCATION (SECOR) • �' -O• (` FORMER SAMPLE LOCATION NOTE: SAMPLE COLLECTED ON DECEMBER 12, 2003. APPROXIMATE SCALE (FEET) • • • 60 SAMPLE ID TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS GASOLINE TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS DIESEL TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS OIL TPHg TPHd TPHo B T E X BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES ALL RESULTS ARE IN MICROGRAMS PER UTER (pg /L) • • C _ C •? 12034 134th COURT NE, SUITE 102 REDMOND, WASHINGTON PH (425) 372 - 1600 /FAX (425) 372 -1650 • • • • EP -6 FORMER PUMP ISANDS GP -2 JOB NUMBER: 01 EL.27482.03 / a ENELMITIM I•,. •.s Rum 1E0E »[i I - -� W1— GP n • • G P -6 GP P3 OE 4Z EP -2 I EP -1 j FORMER TANKI GP - BASIN � ) i PREPARED FOR: FORMER 7- ELEVEN FACILITY NO. 27482 14221 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON DRAWN BY: S. SIMMONS EP -1 GP-5 GP -7 ♦ ♦ 0 EP -8 raffiffIrMil RIZTI Fr DM wionimuind 1=1113111411 110i B GP -8 CHECKED BY: T GP -1064 SITE PLAN WITH GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS APPROVED BY: FIGURE: 4 DATE: 12/15/03 FILEPATHR: \ CAD \CAD_FILES \PROJECTS \7 ELEVEN \27482 \27482(SP).owG MODIFIED BY SSIMMONS AT JAN 22, 2004 - 13:18 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. PATH ON LEFT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 -1 1.1 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF WORK 1 -1 1.2 SITE BACKGROUND 1 -1 1.2.1 REGULATORY STATUS 1 -1 1.2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE 1 -2 1.2.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 1 -2 1.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 1 -2 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION 2 - 1 2.1 HEALTH AND SAFETY 2 -1 2.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE 2 -1 2.3 SITE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES 2 -1 2.4 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 2 -1 2.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES 2 -2 2.6 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE 2 -2 2.7 SAMPLING PLAN DEVIATIONS 2 -2 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 -1 4.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL PROGRAM AND RESULTS. 4 -1 4.1 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM 4 -1 4.2 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 4 -1 4.3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS 4 -2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 5 -1 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 -1 FIGURES Figure 1 — Site Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan with Soil Boring Locations and Adjacent Properties Figure 3 — Site Plan with Soil Analytical Results Figure 4 — Site Plan with Groundwater Analytical Results TABLES Table 1 — Soil Sample Analytical Results Table 2 — Groundwater Sample Analytical Results Table 3 — Calculation of TEF- adjusted Carcinogenic Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations APPENDICES Appendix A — Boring Logs Appendix B — Analytical Data and Chain of Custody Documentation 1:.N.'16diirl: <vi::.]: 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the objective, methodology, scope of work, and the results of the soil and groundwater investigation conducted at the site on December 12, 2003. 1.1 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF WORK Q Z The objective of SECOR's soil and groundwater investigation activities was to evaluate re 2 t he extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impact in soil and groundwater at the site. v 0 SECOR's scope of work included, but was not limited to, the following tasks: w J • Prepare and implement a site - specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) for w o g J • Review historical information from previous assessment activities; u_ co • Collect and classify soil samples from each probe location continuously, and 1 _ collect soil samples for analysis at a minimum interval of 4 -feet; Z �-- ZO • Determine via field screening techniques which samples should be submitted for 2 U � O - . • Prepare this Site Investigation Report. E _ w = U I-- activities at the site; quantitative chemical analysis; and, u 'O The site was formerly 7- Eleven store number 27482 located at the intersection of South v 142 Street and Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). There is 0 1- no indication from historic records that gasoline was stored or sold at the site by 7- z Eleven. The 7- Eleven store closed at this location in 1993. 1.2 SITE BACKGROUND The site is currently being developed as a restaurant and associated parking area. During excavation for subsurface utilities, potentially hydrocarbon- impacted soil was identified, and eight test pits were excavated on September 4, 2003. A total of nine soil samples and one grab groundwater sample were collected from six of the test pits. Based on those results, additional site investigation was deemed necessary to define the nature and extent of the soil and groundwater impacts at the site. 1.2.1 REGULATORY STATUS The site does not appear to be listed in the Washington State Department of Ecology's (Ecology's) electronic Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) or UST database. However, SECOR understands that the site owner reported the release to Ecology in September 2003. The current site address of 14201 Interurban Avenue South is not listed in Ecology's UST database. According to the King County Assessors office, the southernmost parcel comprising the site is listed with a street address of 14221 Interurban Avenue South. However, a form submitted to Ecology by Lee Morse, 1 -1 SECOR International Incorporated General Contractor for the permanent closure of the USTs at the site that lists the Southland Corporation (currently 7- Eleven) as property owner, indicates that the site address at that time was 14225 Interurban Avenue South. A site is listed on Ecology's UST database at 14225 Interurban Avenue South under site identification number 2890, and with a site name of Jem Locke. Therefore, Jem Locke is likely the previous owner and operator of USTs at the site. 1.2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USE The site is located in a mixed commercial /residential area of Tukwila. Residences are located west of the site at the top of the slope located on the west side of the site. Commercial properties are located adjacent to the site to the south and east across Interurban Avenue South. A "Start Mart" automotive repair shop is the commercial property north of the site, across 142 Street South. 1.2.3 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is currently under construction as a restaurant and associated parking. The building covers approximately 3,000 square feet. The property is located approximately 350 feet southwest of the Duwamish River at an elevation of approximately 40 feet above mean sea level. 1.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS In September 2003, Eco -Tec -Inc of Vaughn, Washington conducted an initial assessment of impacted soil including the excavation of eight test pits. Based on that assessment, additional investigation was required to determine the nature and extent of the impacts to soil and groundwater at the site. 1 -2 SECOR International Incorporated 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION SECOR supervised the advancement of ten direct push Geoprobe borings (GP -1 through GP -10), on December 12, 2003. The probes were advanced at the locations depicted on Figure 2. All probe locations were strategically placed to assess the condition of subsurface soils in the vicinity of the impacted soils identified during the initial assessment conducted in September 2003. The site assessment activities were supervised by a SECOR geologist. SECOR contracted Cascade Drilling, Inc. (Cascade), of Woodinville, Washington to complete the advancement and sampling of the geoprobes at the site. A description of the soil and groundwater assessment activities conducted on December 12, 2003 is provided below. Boring logs are included in Appendix A. 2.1 HEALTH AND SAFETY A site specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) was prepared for the site as part of the project. The HASP identified potential physical and chemical hazards associated with the proposed field activities and established personnel protection standards and mandatory safety practices. The HASP also included information on suspected chemical compounds to be encountered, a list of monitoring equipment, the required protective clothing and equipment, a map and directions to the nearest hospital and a list of emergency telephone numbers. The HASP was available on -site at all times during the field activities. All SECOR personnel and subcontractors working on the site were required to review, sign and comply with the provision set forth in the HASP. 2.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE Prior to advancement of the soil probes, SECOR arranged to have a municipal underground utility location service identify subsurface municipal utilities located in public rights -of -way. In addition, SECOR contracted with a private underground utility location service to clear the marked proposed boring locations on the subject property. 2.3 SITE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES Probes GP -1 through GP -10 were advanced using a Geoprobe truck - mounted hydraulically driven soil coring system. The probes were advanced to a maximum depth of 16 -feet bgs. Upon completion of sampling, the probes were backfilled with hydrated, medium bentonite chips. Complete soil probe descriptions are included in the Boring Logs, Appendix A. 2.4 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY Soil samples were visually examined and the general soil lithology was recorded in the field probe log. Soil samples from each of the borings were prepared for laboratory analysis by cutting sections of the acetate liner and capping both ends with Teflon lined caps. All soil samples were uniquely labeled and transferred a cooler with ice pending transport to the analytical laboratory. Remaining soil in the sampler was used to conduct field screening. Field screening consisted of visual observations of potential hydrocarbon contamination and headspace analysis for volatile organic vapors. Soil samples were s creened i n t he f ield u sing a p hotoionization d etector ( PID), v isual a nd obvious olfactory observations. Headspace testing for volatile organic vapors was completed 2 -1 SECOR International Incorporated using a portable photoionization detector (PID) to monitor volatile vapors given off by the sampled soil. A sample of the soil matrix was placed in a re- sealable plastic bag, and allowed to equilibrate for approximately ten minutes. The probe of the PID was used to pierce the plastic, and was extended into the headspace above the soil surface. The greatest vapor reading obtained during the next 60 seconds was then recorded. The PID was calibrated daily with 100 parts per million (ppm) isobutylene gas in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. PID readings for collected soil samples are noted on the boring logs in Appendix A. Obvious odors and staining were also noted on the boring logs. After collection, soil samples were placed in a cooler on ice for subsequent transport to OnSite Environmental, Inc. (OSE) of Redmond, Washington, an Ecology- accredited fixed -base analytical laboratory. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended protocols for sample management, including chain -of- custody procedures and documentation, were observed during all sampling activities. 2.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES Quality assurance procedures included decontamination of all sampling equipment prior to use, and between each sampling location. Decontamination was completed with an Alconox soap wash, and rinsing with distilled water. 2.6 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE Investigation- derived wastes were stored in sealed and labeled 5- gallon bucket and temporarily stored on the site pending receipt of analytical results. Because a remedial action is expected at the site, this waste will be removed during the remedial effort. 2.7 SAMPLING PLAN DEVIATIONS A soil sample was not collected at the 4 -foot sampling interval at GP -8 because there was no recovery in the sampler at that location and depth. In addition, soil samples were collected and submitted for analysis at 12 -feet bgs in probe locations GP -3, GP -4, and GP -6 because groundwater did not enter these borings at 8 -feet bgs, as it h ad i n the remaining s oil probe I ocations. However, greater c lay content in the 8- to 12 -foot bgs interval in these borings likely caused slow or no entry of groundwater into GP -3, GP -4, and GP -5, even though the clayey soils at these locations and depth were below the prevailing site water table, and were likely saturated. 2 -2 SECOR International Incorporated 3 _ .J 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS From the surface to approximately 4 -feet bgs, the site is underlain with grey and brown silty sand, except in the vicinity of GP -9 and GP -10, where grey silt was encountered to the same depth. From 4 -feet bgs to 12 -feet bgs, the total depth of exploration, the site is underlain with silty clay or silty sand. Based on past experience, the type and composition of these sediments is consistent with glacial till and with alluvial floodplain deposits. Groundwater entered the soil borings during drilling activities at 8 -feet bgs in all the borings, except GP -3, GP -4, and GP -6. In borings GP -3, GP -4, and GP -6, a greater clay content was noted below 8 -feet bgs, which may explain the slow entry of groundwater into these borings. Based on the lithology at these locations and groundwater entry into the soil borings at seven of the ten locations at 8 -feet bgs, it is SECOR's opinion that the groundwater table exists over the entire investigation area at approximately 8 -feet bgs. 3 -1 SECOR International Incorporated 4.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL PROGRAM AND RESULTS Soil sample laboratory analytical results are presented in Table 1 and on Figure 3, and groundwater analytical results are presented in Table 2 and on Figure 4. Laboratory analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are presented in Appendix B. The analytical results z are discussed below. < i z re w 4.1 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM D A total of 23 soil samples were collected from GP -1 through GP -10, and were all v o submitted to On -Site Environmental Inc. in Redmond, Washington. co 0 Ill = Targeted contaminants of concern at the site were identified based on the former u) F- known historical use of the site and Ecology requirements. Therefore, all of the w o collected soil and groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis for total 2 petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH -G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using Ecology- approved method NWTPH - Gx/BTEX. All of the soil u_ samples were also analyzed for diesel- and oil -range total petroleum hydrocarbons = w (TPH -D and TPH -O, respectively) by Ecology- approved method NWTPH -Dx. I- F I — O Based on the presence of TPH -O at elevated concentrations, additional analyses w I- required by Ecology for known waste oils or for oils of unknown origin were run on the 2 D three soil samples with the greatest concentrations of TPH -O. These three soil samples v were additionally analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method o 8260B, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082, total lead by EPA w w Method 6010B, and for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) by Ecology approved I = .. methodology. Twelve soil samples were also analyzed for carcinogenic polynuclear u_- o aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs) by EPA Method 8270/SIM. Three groundwater samples iii z were analyzed for benzene confirmation by EPA Method 8260B. v O ~ Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) is a gasoline additive that was not in use during z the operation of the site as a gasoline distributor, and therefore the samples were not analyzed for MTBE. 4.2 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS TPH -G was detected in six of the 23 samples analyzed at concentrations greater than the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A unrestricted use cleanup level (soil CUL) for TPH -G. However, two of the samples with soil CUL exceedances were collected from below the prevailing water table and the analytical results for these soil samples are not being used to evaluate soil conditions at the site. TPH -G concentrations in soil samples ranged from Tess than the laboratory reporting limit in 16 samples to 3,200 milligrams per kilogram (mg /kg) in the sample collected at 4 -feet bgs at GP -6. TPH -D and TPH-0 were each detected in two of the 23 soil samples at concentrations greater than their respective soil CULs. TPH -D concentrations in soil samples ranged from Tess than the laboratory reporting limit in 12 samples to 25,000 mg /kg in the sample collected at 8 -feet bgs at GP -7. TPH-0 concentrations in soil samples ranged from less than the laboratory reporting limit 4 -1 SECOR International Incorporated in 10 samples to 2,200 mg /kg in the samples collected at 8 -feet bgs at GP -8 and at 4 -feet bgs at GP -4. Benzene was detected in five soil samples at concentrations equal to or greater than the soil CUL for benzene. However, two of these five samples were collected from below the prevailing water table and the analytical results for these soil samples are not being used to evaluate soil conditions at the site. Benzene concentrations in soil samples ranged from Tess than the laboratory reporting limit in 17 samples to 1.6 mg /kg in the sample collected at 4 -feet bgs at GP -6. Ethylbenzene and total xylenes were both detected in the soil sample collected at 4- feet bgs at GP -6 at concentrations of 8.1 mg /kg and 9.2 mg /kg, respectively. This is the only sample that contained concentrations of ethylbenzene and total xylenes greater than their respective soil CULs. Toluene was not detected in any of the soil samples at concentrations greater than its soil CUL. cPAHs a re a s ubset of semivolatile o rganic c ompounds (SVOCs) that are d efined b y Ecology to include benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(a)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene, and dibenz(a,h)anthracene. To determine if these compounds are present at concentrations greater than the Method A soil CULs, the concentration of each of the compounds must be multiplied by the unitless toxicity equivalency factor (TEF) presented in Cleanup Levels and Risk Calculations under the Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation (CLARC), version 3.1, updated November 2001. Once the concentration of each of the above - mentioned compounds is multiplied by its respective TEF, those results are summed. If the summed value of the TEF- adjusted concentrations are less than 0.1 milligram per kilogram, then the cPAHs are considered to be less than the soil CUL for cPAHs. Calculations made to determine which samples exceed the soil CUL for cPAHs is presented in Table 3. cPAHs were detected in three of the 12 samples analyzed for cPAHs at concentrations that result in an exceedance of the soil CUL for cPAHs. These samples are the 8 -foot bgs sample collected at GP -3, the 4 -foot bgs sample collected at GP -4, and the 8 -foot bgs sample collected at GP -8. These samples have TEF- adjusted cPAH concentrations of 0.44 mg /kg, 0.24 mg /kg, and 0.23 mg /kg, respectively. Because these samples also have the greatest concentrations of TPH -O, it appears that the cPAHs are associated with greater concentrations of TPH -O. PCBs were not detected in the samples analyzed for PCBs. Results of the EPH analysis are presented in the laboratory reports included in Appendix B, and have not been tabulated because they are only used to calculate risk -based cleanup levels. However, because of the presence of cPAHs at the site at concentrations greater than their risk - based cleanup levels, the EPH analyses are not useful for calculating Method B cleanup levels. 4.3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS TPH -G was detected in four of the ten groundwater samples analyzed at concentrations greater than the MTCA Method A groundwater cleanup level (groundwater CUL) for TPH -G. TPH -G concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from less than the laboratory reporting limit in four samples to 3,500 micrograms per liter (pg /I) in the sample collected at GP -7. 4 -2 SECOR International Incorporated Benzene was detected in three groundwater samples at concentrations greater than the groundwater CUL for benzene. Benzene concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from Tess than the laboratory reporting limit in five of the samples { to 700 pg /I in the sample collected at GP -6. No other BTEX compound was detected in any of the groundwater samples at concentrations greater than their respective —, groundwater CULs. TPH -D was detected in five of the ten groundwater samples at concentrations greater than the groundwater CUL for TPH -D. TPH -O was detected in two of the ten groundwater samples at concentrations greater than the groundwater CUL for TPH -O. TPH -D concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from less than the laboratory reporting limit in five samples to 10,000 pg /I in the sample collected at GP -7. TPH -O concentrations in groundwater samples ranged from less than the laboratory reporting limit in eight samples to 1,200 pg /I in the sample collected at GP-7. 4 -3 SECOR International Incorporated . itJ ,.. � taz• � ... � 7. a . F1 a it q ? S i. ": s.;a::.x.:t, �... .w6JaL >:1L:..t::�.: ?h:u+cu ki+n .s � .. :,.I.tansca.d N.urajl.%;I:7,Sd�' ... .`} z . c w . 6 00 u, o. W • = J F- N V„ w ga • d =w 1 z � ►- z U 0 O �, O H w • w Z w � ' U I .. o I z 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are based on the results of SECOR's soil and groundwater site investigation: • Groundwater entered seven of the ten soil boring locations at 8 -feet bgs during site assessment activities, and a total of 10 groundwater samples were collected and analyzed. • TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and /or cPAHs, were detected at concentrations greater than their respective soil CULs in one or more soil samples collected from GP -3, GP -4, GP -5, GP -6, GP -7, and GP -8. • TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, and /or benzene were detected at concentrations greater than their respective groundwater CULs in two or more groundwater samples collected from GP -3, GP -4, GP -6, GP -7, and GP -8. 5 -1 SECOR International Incorporated , .. ^ �>:uL4i. niu� i_..t�t.+. ;� K 1 'J..w ,?'• xn:. c: t3ifX+ f.". N.:l l; �.. d+: � .Ml >��ti:.�::i::FH.�- U=iavJ.>'w �4 ".r:.� ., vxuLy, sSc» u�iM: Btvt�': E•.• Raaxw, xi. ffirr.'twuy+d.i:r,�'/irt'.:ay:�ty r5cm. t� 6M RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on the results of SECOR's soil and groundwater site investigation: • SECOR recommends removal of TPH -D, TPH -O, and cPAH- impacted soil present above the water table at the site, because effective in -situ remedial options are not available for these compounds. Because the area of soil impacted with these constituents coincides with TPH -G /BTEX impacted soil, this removal should result in removal of all accessible impacted soil at the site. However, impacted soil immediately adjacent to or below the City of Tukwila sidewalk or the underlying sanitary sewer line, or impacted soil within a setback established by a Geotechnical engineer from the toe of the hillslope may remain in place after executing this remedial option. • SECOR recommends drilling, installing, and developing a minimum of four groundwater monitoring wells at the site to determine the nature and extent of hydrocarbon impacts in groundwater after completion of the remedial excavation. SECOR recommends drilling and installing the wells after completion of the southern parking lot and landscaping at the site because it will allow SECOR to choose well locations that are inconspicuous and minimize impacts to operations of the restaurant. In addition, SECOR believes that the final wells completions would be more aesthetically pleasing if done after site surfacing was complete. - u i.u....+S 4 _ ' w.QM St.+.,x�; A' , :a:•..;z. : 'F.:r , x �:aai...�t ` w`. �` 4i.& Sr' it°.=;% �. ytti4i4Yr:: �i+" tsL: tsaa: r:. tken: �: Uts�n :Lmru'aii.:altiri.eatf6kriuA'z ul.i�." < �: Y•' nR. w- 4' �' 4ir! GFJ k..cv.n: }i. N .�a��. 6 -1 SECOR International Incorporated WWI --,J _J "*Th SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT 7-Eleven Former 7-Eleven Facility Number 274 14201 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington • DATE January 22..2004 SECOR PN• 01 EL.27482.03 Submitted by: SECOR Internatlonal incorporated '12034 134th Court NE. Suite 102 P.O. Box 230 Rudmond. Prepared by: . — MaLreen S:.;.inchez.,1_.•ii Maureen E. Sanchez Senior Hvcirogeoiog;:_.i. Revievved by. John Wainwright. P.E. Senior Project Man;Kier SubmiztL!cl to: Mr. Ken Hilliard Environmental Compliance 7-Eleven. Inc. 0. E.ox 71": nalla:s. TX 7 :',111 J/IN 6 ' i Co 0 U 4 '"*".•""-"'" Z < • 3— Z w 0 0 • 11.1 WI -J LL uj 0 . g u. ‹: 0) a F z cy z tu O 0) uj 0 , u. " Z (/) I 0 I— Z EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR) conducted soil and groundwater sampling at former 7- Eleven Facility 27482, located at 14201 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington (site). The site location is presented on Figure 1. Soil and groundwater sampling were conducted on December 12, 2003. z Summary of Scope of Work: w 6 2 • Ten soil probes, GP -1 through GP -10, were advanced at the site to evaluate the extent v o of petroleum hydrocarbon impact in soil and groundwater. The probes were advanced u) ❑ to total depths ranging from 12 feet below ground surface (bgs) to 16 feet bgs. w w _I u) L • The s oil probes w ere a dvanced u sing a G eoprobe t ruck - mounted h ydraulically d riven W p soil coring system. Advancement of the soil probes was overseen by a SECOR geologist, who was also responsible for logging the observed lithology and collecting samples. ❑ _� • A total of 23 soil samples were collected during advancement of the soil probes. z Samples were typically collected at 4- and 8 -feet bgs from each probe location. In 0 addition, soil samples were collected at 12 -feet bgs from soil probes GP -3, GP -4, and w I-- GP-6. Based on the lithology, depth of collection, and the depth of groundwater 2 D observed across the rest of the site, the 12 -foot samples appear to have been collected D ❑ from below the water table. Therefore, the analytical results for these soil samples were not used to evaluate vadose zone soil conditions at the site. ❑ '— w - U • Groundwater samples were obtained from each probe locations after collection of soil +l- p samples. After collection of the soil samples, the probe was advanced another four feet w z . and four feet o f temporary s creen was s et a t the b ottom oft he probe. Groundwater U i samples w ere collected from t his i nterval from each s oil probe I ocation. This s creen 0'- interval was typically from 8- to 12 -feet bgs, but was from 12- to 16 -feet bgs in GP -3, Z GP -4, and GP -6. • All of the collected soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH -G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) approved method NWTPH - Gx/BTEX. The samples were also analyzed for diesel- and oil -range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH -D and TPH -O, respectively) b y E cology- approved method NWTPH -Dx. In addition, three soil samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8 260B, p olychlorinated b iphenyls ( PCBs) b y E PA M ethod 8 082, total I ead b y EPA Method 6010B, and for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) by Ecology approved methodology. A total of twelve soil samples were also analyzed for carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs) by EPA Method 8270/SIM. • Ten groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis for TPH -G /BTEX using Ecology- approved method NWTPH - Gx/BTEX, and for TPH -D and TPH -O Ecology- approved method NWTPH -Dx. Three of the ten groundwater samples were analyzed by EPA 8260B to confirm the presence of benzene. SECOR International Incorporated J a. • One 5- gallon bucket of investigation- derived non - hazardous waste soil was sealed, labeled and left on -site pending disposal. Key findings: • Groundwater entered seven of the 10 soil probe locations at 8 -feet bgs. • TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and /or cPAHs, were detected at concentrations greater than their respective Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) Method A unrestricted use soil cleanup levels (soil CULs) in soil samples collected from GP -3, GP -4, GP -5, GP -6, GP -7, and GP -8. • TPH -G, TPH -D, TPH -O, and benzene were detected at concentrations greater than their respective MTCA Method A groundwater cleanup levels (groundwater CULs) in groundwater samples collected from GP -3, GP -4, GP -6, GP -7, and GP -8. • Based on the findings of this investigation, SECOR recommends excavation to remove the accessible hydrocarbon- impacted soil. In addition, SECOR recommends installation of four groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate hydrocarbon impact to groundwater following completion of the remedial excavation. I I SECOR International Incorporated 22r:.p�a ti:i. x «...<;,s�r idn.xk.lzilS;`.r:;.ic,pi e.t�e1:3:M,iGlra<1�4r ::445"x' j: L+ �7Lilq ^y�(j,4y�.r1'ydi1.11 "4k4+ Carol Lumb - Re: Current/correct zoning Carol Lumb Senior Planner 206 - 431 -3661 clumb@ci.tukwila.wa.us Janet Collins Commercial Appraiser II King County Department of Assessments Janet.Collins@metrokc.gov From: Carol Lumb To: Brenda Holt; Collins, Janet Date: 1/9/04 1:16PM Subject: Re: Current/correct zoning Hi Janet: you are correct that this parcel is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential. It formerly was part of Lot 20 which fronts on Interurban and had 2 zoning designations. As part of Lot 20, the front is zoned Regional Commercial /Mixed Use (RCM) and the hillside portion is zoned LDR. We approved a boundary line adjustment in 2003, L03 -019, that rearranged the lot lines for several parcels along Interurban including this one. The purpose was to separate out the single family zoned area from the commercial zoned area, which is currently being developed as a restaurant. I hope this helps clarify the zoning for you. Let me know if you need any more information or want a copy of the BLA. »> "Collins, Janet" <Janet.Collins©METROKC.GOV> 01/08/04 02:09PM »> Hello Brenda. I'm hoping you can give me the most current zone for the following parcel in Tukwila: 336590 -1485. From what I can tell I think it should be LDR. But our records say RCM. Clear this up for me? Thanks, Janet Collins Page 1 Sent By: SOFIAS; Dave McPherson City of Tukwila 16300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa January 2, 2004 RE: Landscape Sprinkler System Dear Mr. McPherson: The purpose of this letter is to req for the installation of the landscape irriga finance & budget related. If an extension i will make every effort to ensure the live Secondly, we ask for the City of T Interurban Ave. So. & 58 Ave, Although I will continue to work disappoints me to advise that, even with we may still be unable to complete this pr Thank you for your consideration, project, If you have any questions, 'please Thank you, Sincerely, Mario Galliano Owner 2062439074; ,t. . j Military Road So. Washington 98188 (206) 243 -7806 (206) 243 -9074 1 )n Jan -2 -04 3:26PM; 'to T c'' ,fir i ;A•� r4 t� ,1 .% =ter S it`�a;; U .... ,� c am" P •\Ir ��' 01 - , est an 18 -month extension or n system. The reason for this acceptable to the city, I/Galli od & health of the aff'ected.pl kwila's assistance installing n gra eq . tits gorously to complete this proj ct, assistance of the city regar• g t ect. ou have been yery helpful thr ° gh ':ut this el free to call me any time at ( 06 683 -5059. Page 1/1 t?2D1Qn 0"A 161,4 G4'1+' period" est is Cucina tc. urbing on se 2 items, E •EMU) :JA 0 2 2004 1 KVJIL, B IC WORKS z z re w 0 o o N W W= J F — W g -J u. co a � z = z o. w • w . O N o I- w = 0 �-o w co 0 z Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I. LESLIE. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: L O 3 — 03y Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: CAR o L. Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other NOTICE. of DF•C Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 62D day ofJULY in the year 20 o3 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM ak,�e:.��treusn'c Project Name: CIA LL kP.,.AO5 CU C 1 NI A Project Number: L O 3 — 03y Mailer's Signature: L - Person requesting mailing: CAR o L. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 62D day ofJULY in the year 20 o3 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM ak,�e:.��treusn'c City of Tukwila Department of Community Development TO: Mario Galliano, Applicant King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction All Parties of Record This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Project File Number: Applicant: NOTICE OF DECISION I. PROJECT INFORMATION L03 -036, Galliano's Cucina Restaurant Mario Galliano Type of Permit Applied for: Tree Clearing Permit Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director July 25, 2003 Project Description: Clearing of trees at base of slope in preparation of site to construct a 3,000 sq. ft. restaurant/deli with drive- through pick -up window Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: 14201 Interurban Avenue South E03 -003 (environmental review), L03 -017 (administrative design review) Regional Commercial/Mixed Use Regional Commercial/Mixed Use II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. determined that the project, as proposed, does not require a threshold determination under SEPA because it qualifies as a planned action pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -172, that the probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the project were adequately analyzed in the EIS previously prepared for the planned action and will implement the conditions and mitigation measures imposed by the planned action approval. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 h Galliano's Cucina Notice of Decision July 25, 2003 X determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), or determined that the project does not create a probable significant environmental impact if specific mitigation conditions are imposed on the project and issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) requiring compliance with those mitigation conditions, or determined that the project creates a probable significant environmental impact and required preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a tree cutting permit for a restaurant does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions that are set forth in the Decision based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. The tree cutting permit provides additional landscaping to mitigate for trees removed from the base of the slope, in addition to the landscaping provided through the administrative design review approval. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, which is 5:00 p.m., Friday, August 8, 2003. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. c:mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\NotDec- Trees.doc 2 Galliano's Cucina Notice of Decision July 25, 2003 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Planning Commission decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. C • ntact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. \t/ De It. rtment o Community Develop ent City of Tukwila V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS c:mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\NotDec- Trees.doc VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION 3 z ric J O O 0 O O . (/) = J F— w 0 2 LL¢ _ • a W H =. I . I 0 Z F- w w O O aI— wW I I - w z O 2 0 z () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION () DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS () POLICE ( ) PLANNING () PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE () MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM () SEATTLE TIMES () SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: W DMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC t 4; .� .."INLr�:+' s�r:iL.±.;i�i? br.; 14 J. i�• 3:.nis.F%n:dom+:einL::aoxx44.• An4 u,.+«+r,.0 CHEL,.LIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PEF.,.,, r MAILINGS ( ) FIRE ( ) FINANCE () BUILDING ( ) MAYOR FEDERAL AGENCIES WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS "SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES MEDIA () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE () K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR () K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES FOSTER LIBRARY 0 '0 K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OFSEATAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER () HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WVWV PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record Z * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination = I KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand tu Send These Documents to DOE: U O SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) co 0 Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) co = SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) —.1 '— Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) N iO Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) w SHORELINE MAILINGS: 1 Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 u d feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of I W Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit Z H written comments on the application or desiring to 'receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so I— 0 within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must.include the W H information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. ? D : U Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: p H Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) ui u i Department of Ecology Shorelands Section I = .. 0 S tate Attorney General u- ~O *Applicant to Z *Indian Tribes U co *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). i H *Any parties of record Z * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: ADMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC 4': liiSaL >Y(s4;71 Ms Micl ael` Ricks 14228 59 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 MrMario Galliano:.. Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South Seatac, WA 98188 Ms. Michael Ricks 14228 59 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 David Thorstad 406 South 289 Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Ms. Michael Ricks 14228 59 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 Mr. Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South Seatac, WA 98188 Mr. Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South Seatac, WA 98188 David Thorstad 406 South 289 Street Federal Way, WA 98003 David Thorstad 406 South 289 Street Federal Way, WA 98003 David Thorstad 406 South 289 Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Mr. Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South Seatac, WA 98188 Ms. Michael Ricks 14228 59 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 City of Tukwila July 7, 2003 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director z Z w 6 2 U . 00 w 0. J F- • LL. w J = w _ Z �. 1- 0 Z ~ w We have received your June 24, 2003 revised landscaping plan submitted in response to the City's June 18, 2003 letter to you providing comments on the proposed landscaping v o cn plan for the tree cutting permit. o f- w I would first like to address your contention that the trees you removed were hazardous, - o as we have discussed this in detail in telephone conversations. The geotechnical report prepared by Dennis Bruce, on page nine states the following: "...Select tree thinning and select tree removal is geotechnically acceptable, subject to z this engineer's on -site recommendation. This engineer observed that some of the slope trees appear to be to be top -heavy and potentially subject to wind toppling. When trees are blown down by severe windstorms on slope faces, slope instabilities result. Therefore, it is essential that slope trees be evaluated and properly maintained. "(emphasis added) Mr. Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South SeaTac, WA 98188 RE: L03 -036, Tree Cutting Permit Dear Mario: The key words in the geotechnical report are "appear" and "evaluated and properly maintained." The trees "appear" to be top heavy, but they should have been evaluated by a professional, such as an arborist, to determine the appropriate course of action for the trees on the slope. The appropriate course of action could very possibly have been the removal of some trees and the trimming of others, based on recommendations of a trained professional. By removing the trees without permission and without a permit, the City did not have an opportunity to make that determination. The June 18, 2003 letter from me requested that you provide the number and size (in diameter) of each tree removed. As you did not provide the individual tree sizes, I visited the site with a colleague who is a licensed landscape architect. We determined that 12 trees had been cut (which matches my previous count and also the site photos taken soon 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Diameter of Existing Tree Removed (TMC 18.54) Number of Replacement Trees Required (TMC 18.54) Number of Trees Removed at Galliano's Cucina Site Number of Replacement Trees Required at Galliano's Cucina Site 4 -8 inches 1 (2) 6 -inch 2 8 -12 inches 2 C3) (2) 8- inch, (t) t24(110 12 -18 inches 4 (1) 10 -inch, (3) 16- inch 12 18 -24 inches 6 (2) 20 -inch 12 > 24 inches 8 -0- " 0 TOTAL 12 Trees Removed 36 Replacement Trees Required Mr. Mario Galliano L03 -036, Tree Cutting Permit July 7, 2003 after the trees were illegally removed). The table below identifies the requirements of TMC 18.54.130.3., the number and diameter of trees removed from your site and the number of required replacement trees: The revised landscaping plan you submitted on June 24, 2003 proposes to cut the ivy on 21 trees and plant an additional 14 trees as mitigation for removing the 12 trees from the sloped area. The City will permit substituting the removal of ivy from 21 trees for the planting of 21 trees, however, one additional tree must be added to the number you propose to plant for a total of 15 trees planted. That tree must either be planted in the lawn area where the other two replacement trees are going or in the southwest corner of the site along 58 Avenue South, as noted on the enclosed drawing. The revised landscaping plan reflecting the correction noted above must be submitted for review and approval prior to approval of the tree cutting permit. If you have any questions, please call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, 19((44,4-- Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Jack Pace, Deputy Director, Department of Community Development c:\mydocs \Galliano's Cucina \L03 - 036- corrections2 2 June 26, 2003 Dear Mario: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South SeaTac, WA 98188 RE: L03 -019 Boundary Line Adjustment The short Subdivision Committee has completed their review of your boundary line adjustment application and approved the application. The next step in the process is to record the boundary line adjustment with King County. I am enclosing a hand out that explains the recording procedures. If you would like a recorded copy of the documents you will need to take two copies plus the originals to the County for recording. The boundary line adjustment is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. The signature of the Chairman of the Short Subdivision Committee certifies that your boundary line adjustment application is ready for recording. You will need to pay the recording fees and submit your approved original boundary line adjustment to the King County Department of Public Records (206- 296 - 1570). After recording, the County returns the recorded original to the City of Tukwila within 4 to 6 weeks, at which time your boundary line adjustment is considered complete. You can shorten this processing time by hand- delivering a copy of the recorded boundary line adjustment to me. If you have any questions, please contact me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, C Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosure: Approved Boundary Line Adjustment L030 -019 c: \mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\BLA- approval letter.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Carol Lumb City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, wa 98188 C ucina 16435 Military Road So. Seattle, Washington 98188 Tel: (206) 243 -7806 Fax (206) 243 -9074 JUN <.a 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: L03 -036, Tree Cutting Permit Dear Carol: Enclosed please find a re- marked up copy of the landscape plan for the proposed deli at 14201 Interurban Ave So. The number of trees .totaled 10: Their sizes varied from 3" to 16 ". The number of trees from which ivy is to be removed on my property on the hillside tops 21. I would like to remind the city that the 10 trees removed were hazardous to the stability of the: hillside and to any pedestrian below front which these unbalanced, sideward growing trees, internally rotted, were situated This is not simply my view, rather, , the conclzrsion of an independent professional analysis fi•o the Geotechnical Engineer and the Landscape'Architect. I believe TMC 18.54 specifically allows for the removal of hazardoius trees, & we believe that we were, and are in compliance of code. As a measure of good will, 'I offer to cut the Ivy on the 21 trees on the hillside and import and install 14 additional trees as specified on my marked up copy of the enclosed landscape plan: Afterr additional review and analysis from the landscape architect, the 10 trees in the lawn area would have difficulty surviving due to their close proximity to each other. Secondly, we are not able to install extra trees in the lawn area as this will block and hide the view of the building and signage. vs g4 t4:4 .,.. .Y aa.::, .fL'yrt«: Xrm li,�},ri� s" r` ' rs3 ^ d� S vi .11,14 Y �n_aniL:ratuc:•,:au rcvol,— uout.srac.; r aaaa Please be advised these :14 additional trees I offer to import & install, are in addition to the already 30 trees & 671 plants, flowers, and, shrubs that we are importing & installing for this Italian deli. In summary, 'I hope the city finds these measure fair and reasonable. ' If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 206- 683 -5059. Cc; Raymond Brauner,;Landscape Architect Dennis Bruce,. Geo'technical Engineer David Thorstad,' Architect 44-4:4r3. h tir;icy AFicali:Y' ',�b: , .<. ,.'Wtc '� % , d =1% Fi. :?.F.4iiTA:;•i eadizaNity utr:,: ozs, L :r:itnL:�,fLUrvi6ai.�i- 4�t:yS'i city of Tukwila J.,.,.t ..A' Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: David Thorstad, Applicant King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction All Parties of Record NOTICE OF DECISION June 20, 2003 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L03 -017, Galliano's Cucina Restaurant Applicant: David Thorstad, for Mario Galliano Type of Permit Applied for: Administrative Design Review Project Description: Construction of a 3,000 sq. ft. restaurant/deli with drive- through pick -up window Location: 14201 Interurban Avenue South Associated Files: E03 -003 (environmental review), L03 -036 (tree cutting permit) Comprehensive Plan Regional Commercial/Mixed Use Designation Zoning District: Regional Commercial/Mixed Use 11. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. determined that the project, as proposed, does not require a threshold determination under SEPA because it qualifies as a planned action pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -172, that the probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the project were adequately analyzed in the EIS previously prepared for the planned action and will implement the conditions and mitigation measures imposed by the planned action approval. X determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), or 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Galliano's Cucina Notice of Decision June 20, 2003 determined that the project does not create a probable significant environmental impact if specific Q mitigation conditions are imposed on the project and issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance ; i- z (MDNS) requiring compliance with those mitigation conditions, or ct 2 d that the project creates a probable significant environmental impact and required preparation J v of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project. 0 0 CD 0 Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application J for administrative design review for a restaurant does comply with applicable City and state code 0 u_ requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions that are set forth in the Decision w O based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. The following condition was applied: LLQ "A pedestrian crosswalk must be added leading from the north parking lot to the restaurant's cn a back entrance to provide safer access for pedestrians." = w z'— Please note that a tree cutting permit, L03 -036, must be approved that will provide additional landscaping to z O mitigate for trees removed from the base of the slope. w w III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS 0 O- 0 The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code w w §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. I - No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Planning LLj Commission -Board of Architectural Review of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. If an MDNS v = was issued, any person wishing to challenge either the conditions that were imposed by the MDNS decision z F- or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS must raise such issues as part of the appeal to the Planning Commission. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision. In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, 5:00 p.m., Monday, July 7, 2003. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. c:mydocs\Galliano's Cucina\NotDec- AdmDR.doc 2 Galliano's Cucina Notice of Decision June 20, 2003 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an 1VIDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Planning Commission Adecision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an•EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. e Deprtment of\Community Development City of Tukwila c:mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\NotDec- AdmDR.doc 3 NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: Prepared June 19, 2003 Notice of Application mailed to applicant, agencies with jurisdiction May 2, 2003 Notice of Application posted on site May 2, 2003 L03 -017 E03 -003 (State Environmental Policy Act review) L03 -019 (Boundary Line Adjustment) David Thorstad, for Mario Galliano Administrative design review approval for a 3,000 square foot restaurant and deli with drive through pick -up and 48 parking stalls. 14201 Interurban Avenue South Regional Commercial/Mixed Use Regional Commercial/Mixed Use Determination of Nonsignificance Approval with Conditions Carol Lumb, Senior Planner A. Site Plan and Building Elevations B. Landscaping Plan C. Materials Display D. Applicant's Response to Design Review Criteria E. Lighting Fixtures Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Staff Report to DCD Director Galliano's Cucina Restaurant, L03 -017 Vicinity /Site Information A. Project Description: The proposal is to construct a 3,000 square foot restaurant and deli with 48 parking stalls. B. Existing Development: The site is vacant, with dense vegetation on the hillside that forms the western boundary of the site. C. Surrounding Land Use: FINDINGS The site is located on Interurban Avenue with South 141 Place forming the northern boundary, with office uses on the east across Interurban and a residential house converted to an office on the south. Residential development is located above the site at the top of the slope on 59 Place South. D. Terrain: The terrain is flat with steep slopes on the west. The slope is densely vegetated. The portion of the site that will be developed is flat. E. Vegetation: The slope on the west side of the site is densely vegetated, although most of the slope is not part of the applicant's property. The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan to comply with the landscaping code. Some trees on the slope were cleared without a Tree Cutting permit; a mitigation plan will be required with the tree cutting permit. F. Public Facilities: The site is served by Tukwila sewer and water services. Interurban Avenue South and S. 141 Place provide vehicle access to the site. 2 .` l.J'kstl ttia ilx:2 tiLitr 3:iL444ti v± iskc'1S7K,1: a'sh:k ti�asasilili!.�w+.fQ;;. 1+cstYv;S:iti2:Y.+,,,.L- r =Y; c: \mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\AdmDR -staff rpt.doc Staff Report to DCD Director Galliano's Cucina Restaurant, L03 -017 DECISION CRITERIA The project is subject to Administrative Design Review approval as required by TMC 18.26.070. In the following discussion, the design review criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staffs comments. For the applicant's response to the criteria, please see Attachment B. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the ' site. Response: The majority of the site is flat, with steep slopes forming the western boundary. The landscaping plan provides planting materials in the front of the site along Interurban to help screen the parking area. The garbage collection area is located on the north side of the building and is screened by fencing. The height of the building is 24 feet, which is consistent with the office buildings across the street and the building adjacent on the south and fits with the terrain of the site. 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony of texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Response: The proposed restaurant is adjacent to a two story single family home that has been converted to an office building; one -story office buildings are located across the street. The height of the proposed restaurant is similar to the other structures in the area. Pedestrians are brought to the front door via a sidewalk from the parking area closest to the building. There is also a sidewalk that brings patrons onsite from the public sidewalk on Interurban. A pedestrian crosswalk will be required to connect the north parking lot to the north end of the c: \mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\AdmDR -staff rpt.doc 3 Staff Report to DCD Director Galliano's Cucina Restaurant, L03 -017 restaurant, which has a rear entrance to the building. This will draw attention for vehicles to the possibility of pedestrians entering the driveway from the parking lot. The site is landscaped on the east side of the property with shrubs and Norway Maple trees to screen the restaurant from the house which has been converted to office use. To ensure driver safety at the site driveways, the driveway onto 58 Avenue South and the northern-most driveway onto Interurban Avenue South will be restricted to a right - in/right -out access only. The southern driveway will have no restrictions on movement. The appropriate on -site signage and c- curbing on Interurban Avenue South and 58 Avenue South will be required to ensure these traffic movements. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. .Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The landscaping plan, Attachment B., illustrates the proposed landscaping for the site. The landscaping plan does not reflect additional trees that will be planted to provide mitigation through a Tree Clearing permit. The Tree Clearing permit is required to address trees on the steep slopes that were removed without a permit. Additional trees will be planted at the base of the slope and in the lawn area adjacent to the parking stalls as mitigation. The applicant is providing two additional feet of landscaping in the front along Interurban. Lawn c: \mydocs \Galliano's CucinaWdmDR -staff tpt.doc 4 Staff Report to DCD Director Galliano's Cucina Restaurant, L03 -017 is located on either side of the restaurant along Interurban. The hillside behind z the site is located on adjacent property. It is heavily vegetated with trees and brush. 'Ce w 6 J U Two different types of pole lighting will be used in the parking areas (see U o Attachment E) with smaller lights mounted on the building and in the landscaping w = on the front. Most of the pole lighting is nine feet in height, with two poles located on landscape islands in the parking lot 22 feet in height. w p w 2 4. Building Design. Q A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; E-- _ B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent z F" neighboring developments; Z O C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should 2 uj have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building cn components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of 0 H the structure; w — D. Colors should be harmonious,.with bright or brilliant colors used only for v accent; ti O E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or titi Z buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, Z 1— standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: The architectural style of the restaurant is "Italian Old World," with stone /river rock on the lower portion of the building facade, tile roof, and arched windows to resemble a cantina. The colors of the Italian national flag, forest green and deep red will be used to provide accents on the building. The windows and front entry-way will be banded with forest green, as will the posts supporting the clear glass coving the front patio entrance. Deep red horizontal bands will be used primarily on the northern side of the building to continue the Italian Old World color scheme. A clear glass covering will be used over the front patio entrance to protect patrons from the weather. The type of light poles selected emphasize the "country/rustic" design of the project. c: \mydocs \Galliano's CucinaWdmDR -staff rpt.doc 5 Staff Report to DCD Director Galliano's Cucina Restaurant, L03 -017 5. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: Not applicable. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: CONCLUSIONS The majority of the site is flat, with steep slopes forming the western boundary. The landscaping plan provides planting materials in the front of the site along Interurban to help screen the parking area. The garbage collection area is located on the north side of the building and is screened by fencing. The height of the building is 24 feet, which is consistent with the office buildings across the street and the building adjacent on the south and fits with the terrain of the site. A pedestrian crosswalk will be required to connect the north parking lot to the north end of the restaurant, where a rear entrance to the building is located. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: The proposed restaurant is adjacent to a two story single family home that has been converted to an office building; one -story office buildings are located across the street. The height of the proposed restaurant is similar to the other structures in the area. Pedestrians are brought to the front door via a sidewalk from the parking area closest to the building. There is also a sidewalk that brings patrons onsite from the public sidewalk. An additional sidewalk will be required to connect the parking area adjacent to South 58 Street to run behind the proposed building on the south side. This will allow separation of pedestrians and vehicles building. The site is landscaped on the east side of the property with shrubs and Norway Maple trees to screen the restaurant from the house which has been converted to office use. c: \mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\AdmDR -staff rpt.doc 6 ... SP37N�517tiwS :x: E* l`3.t :f�'i?".:: ' :f 4444Uagij 3� sit.f.i. it.4 , S �. ��u :..ki:.sn�vaYU�= iPeh•; >:nuUr+ .. - ?;:7a ... Staff Report to DCD Director Galliano's Cucina Restaurant, L03 -017 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: The landscaping plan, Attachment B., illustrates the proposed landscaping for the site. The landscaping plan does not reflect additional trees that will be planted to provide mitigation through a Tree Clearing permit. The Tree Clearing permit is required to address trees on the steep slopes that were removed without a permit. The applicant is providing two additional feet of landscaping in the front along Interurban. Lawn is proposed on either side of the restaurant along Interurban in addition to the formal landscaping materials. The hillside behind the site is located on adjacent property. It is heavily vegetated with trees and brush. Two different types of pole lighting will be used in the parking areas (Attachment E) with smaller lights mounted on the building and in the landscaping on the front. Most of the pole lighting is nine feet in height, with two poles located on landscape islands in the parking lot 22 feet in height. 4. Building Design: The architectural style of the restaurant is "Italian Old World," with stone /river rock on the lower portion of the building facade, tile roof, and arched windows to resemble a cantina. The colors of the Italian national flag, forest green and deep red will be used to provide accents on the building. The windows and front entry-way will be banded with forest green, as will the posts supporting the clear glass coving the front patio entrance. Deep red horizontal bands will be used primarily on the northern side of the building to continue the Italian Old World color scheme. A clear glass covering will be used over the front patio entrance to protect patrons from the weather. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design of the restaurant and the landscaping plan for the site with the following condition: 1. A pedestrian crosswalk must be added leading from the north parking lot to the restaurant's back entrance to provide safer access for pedestrians. Information Item: As noted under the discussion of the project's landscaping, additional trees will be provided under the tree cutting permit, (project file L03 -036) which is still under review. c: \mydocs \Galliano's Cucina\AdmDR- staff rpt.doc 7 June 18, 2003 Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 4330 S. 177 Seatac, WA 98188 City of Tukwila RE: L03 -036, Tree Cutting Permit Dear Mario: Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Enclosed please find a marked -up copy of the landscaping plan for the proposed restaurant at 14201 Interurban Avenue South. The plan must be revised to show the following: 1. An accounting of the number and size of the trees removed without a permit and the number of replacement trees required by TMC 18.54. 2. The number of trees from which ivy is to be removed as proposed to substitute for planting some of the required replacement trees. 3. Revision of the landscaping plan to show planting of additional trees in the lawn area immediately adjacent to the parking stalls as noted on the enclosed plan. Please submit the information requested above as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please call me at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, �erely �/� Ch (6 Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Jack Pace, Deputy Director, Department of Community Development c: \mydocs \Galliano's Cucina \L03 - 036- Corrections.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Mr. Mario Galliano Galliano's Cucina 16435 Military Road South Seatac, WA 98188 RE: Tree Removal at 14201 Interurban Ave. South Dear Mario: Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosure City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director If you have any questions, please call me at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, ((Lit cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Michael Ricks April 29, 2003 As we discussed on the telephone today, no trees were to be removed from the proposed site in the sensitive areas (steep slopes) for Galliano's Cucina without the issuance of a tree - clearing permit. While the geotechnical report notes that "...some of the slope trees appear to be top - heavy and potentially subject to wind toppling..." this observation in and of itself was not sufficient to permit the removal of trees from a sensitive area. Prior to the City approving any tree removal, you would have been required to provide an analysis from a certified arborist, landscape architect or surveyor on the condition of the trees that were top -heavy and provide recommendations on a course of action. It could be there would have been another course of action besides total removal of the trees available as an option. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor To remedy the removal of trees without a permit you must apply for a tree - clearing permit. A permit application is enclosed. If there are additional trees that the geotechnical engineer believes pose a possible hazard, these must be identified in the information provided with the tree - cutting permit. No more trees or vegetation are to be removed from the hillside prior to the issuance of the tree - cutting permit. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 CUir}gw'k::rsa3ai�Lip 'tJ+ STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan a,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, enginrs contractors or other presentatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at i� I .1 - a. J t Q . for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ,� / EXECUTED at Jvl`'w„ (city), W/1' (state), on ,/, / /1 � F4 gg g , L A 4 111C1(' 11 t p 1, ,V (Pr Name) V . • a , Y �y �1 ' L 3Ed s. / ' 7 SeC = Pv 9%16'3 _' oTAP • o g = (Address) N p ti p WAS On this day personally appeared before me Re N6 6 /(/ow?, to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS residing at (Phone Number) (Signature) ((oc) ~SZi`5°1 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington My Commission expires on -.6. L-o 20 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -TREE Planner: rc// Lt 41 6 File Number: L-0 3 - 036 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: pr,, ,C ca- p 1 1 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development TREE 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 RE C E I V E CLEAIRING Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us ; ; : ; . P ERMIT APPLICATION 04/08/03 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: A, Nj cQ (? /4e,40 C II/ fr Ct,LI —, LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. Quarter: S E Section: 1i--/ Township: 7-3 Range: 0 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: / J`t v 60,11v Address: t'/ g .& / 7 % 4 Phone: (306) 663'3 Signature: FAX: C (zc) Date: 6/49/.53 foie` It4iteY K1? F, �_. +: �rY.,�e. �w. + L.�rl. i ... � ... ,.+: E ;,* � { fted �s . � y T),�+� ��.,. e +wit'i7t'L::l. ✓�.�,;., >.R. •:4 ....: .Yl .G' n•i +..2 Y.::3. j t, :ap�li ' ri ratio .Re' afire' : =b waived -iii` ` ' usual a s s s "u' on a ' °'� " u 9 .,.... aY , z , , ,,, p : :..PP t , of ko h- Wor/�� „ ` :.1 r.�. :��'r'-r:�'k7t..:,,•,v.� oc ?' '.tr :�::'�:: �,�,K r ..Ja. >f�,x.'a `'%F. ,..'a-t ...> ° , r :* a� : 'J^'t. 'h "^ : ; .. .: , )• xr:' » .Yt ^ -`�. : Pl annm k� ,• ' ; F J • j ;. ; .J. rt . 8 -1�.« !; 1, � � t •f ' r' L r '�•:: `'::�i�ix L. 5>' `� j M •µms. >.Vryr i�� r i { :S. lx O t t } J Z J ,V " r. ' . i _ it yr r "SSA. y f t' `i• S HR.J )f 1 1. ✓. $y + ' 7y c•_ ^a:' .y t {„ .,a.r i .3 `:L`�`.1;:•t, N".,�.i 'eiP �f�' :,t::.. '.�... . :. `; X v1F b�; Al ` ,,;�: , iF, i. . is A" ..X;• _�..ft�. 2. { "i':' { Atx i °r t�4:':wl�'':,'.4. .S :.L 1 �: .fit >„ f'v i;r ,: . .l '�k'^e ♦♦'Jv¢!i: , d ": ^'. :r � + ' r. r, . wr 3 x .. 4 } `ti7 ' r. Yt r .r{{ �T�u J t Z „ �• rTs ': . 11 t ; `•,r .. r F .! � 4'r }y' Y t. ryi�• ;� . t � . �r ;� r �F`. t, f.. +,",;v .. i;a;. t�,. ��C ... `ti.r. � . �. .. ^ . �. .,.? i.:�r APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Completed Application Form. 1. Application Checklist one (1) copy, indicating items submitted with application. 2. Permit Fee = $25.00. 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 -1/2" x 11". One complete set of PMTS of the final drawing set will be required prior to final approval. SITE PLAN: The site plan is to contain all of the following information. ,/ 4(a).The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Plan sheet size to be 24" x 36 ". (b) Diameter, species names, location and canopy of existing significant trees in relation to proposed and existing structures, utility lines, and construction limit line; ✓--- (c) Identification of all significant trees to be removed and/or relocated. ,–/ (d) Existing and proposed topography of the site at 2 -foot contour intervals; (e) Limits of any sensitive area and sensitive area buffer, and mean high water mark of the river. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The landscape plan is to contain all of the following information. .i 5(a) Diameter, species name, spacing and location of replacement trees /vegetation to be used to replace vegetation cleared; (b) Diameter, species name and location of all significant trees and vegetation to be retained. — (c) Proposed vegetation protection measures. ✓ (d) Any other measures proposed to restore the environmental and aesthetic benefits previously provided by on -site vegetation. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. Department staff is available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670. 04/08/03 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE YK {y,.SY'q!rTN^:z.'.vAn�+': -.rvge C114deitems } �.r.41,_>r, v , 7y l . bvL ' } •' iw .�' t.subii d ky�� ".n'it 7tt t•',! L% . t . h t r tt n 4 ...4:' -r �, f • `CV.d .� ''apphcahbn `� f o rmatio -R i "red: ltf' 'be i awed. n < >Ih r a}!t un ls ivateet es :ii^ r roval,o ,both " -P: ulilic: N!orks ": ..z,;t. - :t :T S,:.ie : .,.. ,... - . ^n4 �i�Y "• :b7 5� :4� 1 yl•, ' ^ f. 1!J y P PP yndl'lr�nirt 3. ,r� t t S • , a �sl r. (l�tt? x1 k•. ^5 .,,'" K. 4 Yrl 6 y S Lary. f Fft :fe Y 4 > Y r .s f� s i 1 T z{ xz � 2 .bltG 6 , � ti i fA �y J S y ,x /y } tt H71"1 C � d • . 1. ? t` .n rF :'y, Y r , r : b . :? ,_} } r .r Y r S f rt4 .r L .d PROFESSIONAL REVIEW OR RECOMMENDATION: Submittal of, or agreement to submit, a review, evaluation, recommendation or plan related to vegetation clearing or replacement prepared by a professional consultant, such as a landscape architect, surveyor, or certified arborist. Services may include, but are not limited to: 6(a) Providing written evaluation of the anticipated effects of proposed construction on the viability of trees on -site; and /or (b) Developing plans for, supervising, and /or monitoring implementation of any required tree protection or replacement measures; and /or (c) Post - construction site inspection and evaluation. SENSITIVE AREA MITIGATION PLAN 7. Identify measures proposed for mitigation of vegetation clearing in a sensitive area and/or its buffer per the Sensitive Areas Overlay District chapter (TMC 18.45). TIME SCHEDULE 8. Proposed time schedule of vegetation removal, relocation, and/or replacement, and other construction activities which may affect on -site vegetation, sensitive area, sensitive area buffer, and/or shoreline zone. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND CONDITIONS 9. The Director may require supplemental studies or other documentation, or specify conditions for work, at any stage of the application or project as he /she may deem necessary to ensure the proposal's compliance with the requirements of this chapter, the Shoreline Overlay District chapter or the Sensitive Areas Overlay District chapter, or to protect public or private property. These conditions may include, but are not limited to, hours or seasons within which work may be conducted, or specific work methods. INSURANCE: In addition to any permit materials or conditions specified pursuant to Chapter 18.54, if in the opinion of the Director the nature of the work is such that it may create a hazard to human life or endanger adjoining property, then the Director may require the applicant to submit a certificate of insurance per the requirements of TMC 18.54.110. 04/08/03 REVIEW CRITERIA The applicant bears responsibility for demonstrating that the proposal satisfies all of the permit approval criteria. Planning Division staff is available to discuss questions you may have regarding the decision criteria and necessary supporting materials. PERMIT APPROVAL CRITERIA To the extent that vegetation retention and/or replacement is consistent with project feasibility or reasonable use of the property, vegetation clearing shall be planned and conducted to meet all of the criteria below. These criteria shall be the basis for approval, approval with conditions or denial of any tree clearing included in a Tree Clearing Permit application. 1. Tree Retention — Site improvements shall be designed and constructed to retain as many existing healthy trees as possible, and to meet the following criteria: 04/08/03 a. Priority shall be given to retention of existing stands of trees, trees at site perimeter, trees with the shoreline Low Impact Environment, in Sensitive Areas or Sensitive Area Buffers, and healthy mature trees. b. All understory vegetation within the essential root zone of protected trees shall be: (1) retained; OR (2) removed by methods which are non - damaging to the tree, and replaced with vegetation with horticultural requirements which are compatible with protected trees. c. Vegetation removal shall be undertaken in such a manner as to preserve, to the degree possible, the aesthetic and ecological benefits provided by such vegetation. 2. Tree Protection Measures — a. The proposal shall include tree protection measures which meet or exceed best management practices and current standards of professional arboriculture, and which are sufficient to ensure the viability of protected trees and other vegetation identified for retention pursuant to requirements of Chapter 18.54, and shall include measures sufficient to protect any Sensitive Area, its Buffer and vegetation within the shoreline Low Impact Environment. b. During clearing and/or construction activities, all protected vegetation shall be surrounded by protective fencing which prevents adverse impacts associated with clearing from intruding into areas of protected vegetation. Diameter of Existing Tree Removed Number of Replacement Trees Required 4- 8 inches 1 8- 12 inches 2 12- 18 inches 4 18- 24 inches 6 > 24 inches 8 3. Tree Replacement — The site shall be planted with trees to meet the following minimum requirements: 04/08/03 a. Each existing significant tree removed shall be replaced with new tree(s), based on the size of the existing tree as shown below, up to a maximum density of 70 new trees per acre. b. Tree Replacement Ratios c. Prior to any vegetation removal, the applicant shall demonstrate through a Landscape Plan, Sensitive Area Mitigation Plan or other materials required per the requirements of Chapter 18.54 that vegetation replacement will meet the following minimum standards: (1) Minimum sizes shall be 2.5 -inch caliper for deciduous trees, 6 to 8 feet in height for evergreen trees, 24- inches in height for shrubs, and 1 gallon for groundcover. (2) Replacement plants shall meet current American Association of Nurserymen standards for nursery stock; (3) Planting and maintenance of required replacement vegetation shall be in accordance with best management practices for landscaping which ensure the vegetation's long -term health and survival. 4. Surrounding Environment — The timing of, and methods to be used in any proposed vegetation removal shall be such that impacts to protected vegetation, wildlife, fisheries and the surrounding environment are minimized. 5. Tree Relocation — Tree relocation shall be carried out according to best management practices, and trees proposed for relocation shall have a reasonable chance for survival. , ..Q. r e•*" ••••••` ��jt•a.7 r1 f'l • # • . :4- A r �14 .r a E' j ;L I �• r K, • In n n LI 'LI LI r L -I r. 0 ' r., ' Z 1 • : u .,..` •,;/r, L. �f > ' y i � 4 ' `' _' 4 ' ' "Y L t > � 1 I� , %401 .. f y , 4j .. y t '.:4; -4 , - -f; 9 .• . ; ! . ".47.,'",",-..;''..;:i; _ `.•+ °r:- 1 . ,k- 4114, `i ,r r,. l W. „ < • •V •IV+ ••:-F "V fa 1•.. .e! . ' . J '. • .• r �1 .<..3. v1. . -• ,) eS t 'r • 'Itit • --,;I . •• ;,- •-- - -, ' tit . 7 'y . ' l -•: ^ 7 ; ' • r7 ' 4 `( ti _ it n -� � ..r. '. -, -,.', r r. ,. 16�.s:4 �_. .,�#�iir ry 7 :Y. i ,; � � . t .l• d KS "" t`� -'. , ~ i� r < l l r : �'r` :: J --7'4'" .--7'4'" , r ,' �_1.1,'Iri.:!‘;)7:7‘ki •r�� :4;11.. J' { y� .' . ` � S i % !'1 � .' • r Y � . } ,[ A , L�, ♦ : �'.' 'L r�� 1 � •f - r .•fi 1 . in" ' % . . ,1 'T . i Cjr fv ' ricr.•-. : " .4 ',. • 9''- ;TT gG . Aj�. S •: .» •) . - � F �� 1 . ,r-c7-4,..-6;r: r '•: r.. . • / S ( / ' M • 4`1 ff�}d t . NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. .J . M r k : /s x l� fit r s •:�ri. .''; i�. • • „ � r1 .; 7 . ,1 d ry •9 r�11 , r: -!' ~ 1 • r - ,:`'' -, �,•� :4'41, ..t �,.,��..��►• { �..,1•��, , , A �, ; tt1�♦ +��, ` , • .. , l.{t;�. i��`� �y,�•'`•�.�y\ \ r!� \: •1w\ Vi y •$• • . t� . ♦ ' 4 ': t • j ft i t "t^x.. • 4 ` ” % ; i• n t4.�►� � +••' 1t ?,� .,.' ,1 , ,. .t may,• \ . aIC (�• \� � .. .•: • " � n•,�r f ,`,'�� ,`'.^`••. •\ , -d • sl � :� f,.. = �� \1,\��. r /t'•,.. '♦`.: fir" �+ \��, `�•.•. �. _ 1 �•`• . �� f . t • v r. a C�' •. ^ • -l. •'y �•, • yam !r , l'�•� ' T^ s r - • �1 lt t . 1' • •' `4• • Z ~ W cc 2 6 JU 00 (/) W = u_ WO II U 0 I-- W W 2 i— H 1 . 11 - - O Z = F. O~ z WIN co eoJ dour INI‘ I ' tam f tea= ANL ail, T'... . } • i � , sr •.i• ;y c - I • . '1 yrt. .ti ' � its t '. (. .• �� •�,, K '� •S ' y r .t ��r t { , s:,'1 '•i • ` ' 1 � 1t'.5.1. 4`t ,,�.L ,:;, 1, �-sa�.r 'T i G- ' f ; '. ∎ \,' ., ' \ • , `t:; 1 ' - V . : � �. `� ti }.. 1 `F • i �, t 'l ; j 'J•+ l •.'f • - ., v':• • `1L 1 , • '••:;-*•.7. r • ' `. :t � r• �• /� ♦ t :, . .1 r • \� .r • �. •wt • .S f . - . . 1� • ' wt • c - 1 . t•'.t '. L . . S., : �, • ^ '• "V. ' : . -- .• - '�1 t ... • •y.. r .. '-.\�•,`. {. t '1 • � . • ,. • ..,::..07. Y ••l i, l '' 1 •r r, \.•1, _. . y .......:*:..2,4.‘.11::: \, i r 1.�j�� - •4 S,3 . 't!•� '9` 'r. : 'l .: �''. �� t v ,. : : : 1 1 .: : . : ''' .u. � w 1 7 .. Mi . . :, ∎ `: Vi a { • '' qt y : ■ ! j•1l ` 1 _•.\�.:� • . •Pl. •'1 �- - -4.; a • `+ •• �'. :S. M ��, • ..r• Y[ . • y • ,i • - • , •`•.`• 1` w ? , . _ r �s t..11. ".. �.. � �''�...'� ..1 t� :; .• ... t ti,,,' " �� ,'t'� ,, � • f r{ • r r ;� .; • 1 `1 .' C.,, -•. -;.t� _. ..1 rp:. „ .,Y..iY .i+= 7r:L.�i.`t •- r'' Z� \�, "', ; 1 ` , l i t ✓,., v 1.../ : . ,,, r ` � . .: ; , ^ , ,.. -• . ' 5 . I''3- ' ,• ,' .- -'t- (:} , 1 , i ; • . ., , r A ir 's n1� ' r r • t , t ' t. L . r j„ •i......i., i' g' .I �w � . x „,_,,,,.,k s , A4. -r KJ� +, , rah A i ,l : s ,,,.. : A •, A . Ap t• ,- g: : ti A �� • • rtr • . I N r • l . • I•' ”' , ' 7 ' 4 � LL -r '^ � • • .:1 �:�•. '�:'�r ',. J}i1 , • .,r, •'• , . , . - � �"',i' • � W '''` a 1,5�� . I 5.1:1,- ;;;. „T"•;: } l: - ' . ' 4 'J” • • ,.� ' t a i " Y , , V 1,• , wx: • ' { , c - ‘.?� t/ :. - �4; a► ` • � •>r - -�. � , ` L. '� , t _.. ....4,-.,, ` t ` • -5. t s r . A �i� '. "• , ^ -7 ' ! C', T t t_ i t s t� F i S f r 1 w., 13 44 •••e - '�' • t 4 ♦ '- 4 iy ▪ � > , ..•, ..�"''. `- i -• }�� , • �. _ r :'r 1 T: } _•ry .� ac•.� Tj M' z H z W O • 2 W O 0 W = U) LL W 0 • 1 • d W z � W 0 U • 0 O 1- W O • - H O 1— z 0 s rffir Una P 4111ft �l1 raII VIM FARM Mil • • .,• • \1/ ^h r. ior -1r- , . �,. , ' ; . } �� 1 � , r • :.4�1 `1, = +'��.W •' `' ,514 J l am . • { 1 • / • I� r t n . t • Atc F 4 .,01,44" f ); • „Jr AN. f,' ' • - d A�.. { • • n� 1 apt rr, .t.••:<.;:. tj r .: x a. 11 � ,1 r", .'t r F at � • � Ji1 ��.')• T AB ` '` . �\ ■ • �- `` •••• •1,. ) • , „„,,,,..,, : 1 4! t*, I., !'4‘44 Ifii, I ,� . : l .,,jr- , , , . .s‘ ‘:.-- 4 ' 44•V - ' .1 `;4*-':'.••_<1 A ' .' i ' '''' t" k N. r' (1 .. - .':..4 , ,,, , . ,. 4 +. 'r -, 4t , +t. . . A N.---::, ..=- ... \ .•\.-•, ':, .' ,,.' .f' t, a•'t! ✓f i'' `':�' ` 'ti \' i �\ ' i, ` ' ``i �` .✓ 1 • } • 1 �. ,r1 is or, z IZ 5 J 00 W= W • O 0) _ = O • W Z I- O W ~ • W O F- W W 2 I- O w z U = O Z ® ■ L aJ nnn u LI u I L • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. z F-L w cc 2 Q J U 00 U) W J = w Q LL < U 2 d H w Z = F- H O zI- w W D 0 U O - O H W W 2 — O z w (I) U - P _ O ~ z CO i t a Z W Q • 2 W � JU O 0 U) W J U) � W o Q _ LL Q d • W Z F- I- O Z I- W W 2 p Dp U O - D I-- W w H� Li_ O •. Z W U= O 1- Z ru 0111 10"" z ~ w LU J U O 0 � V) W J = I W O QC 11 • Q = • d W Z F- F- O Z I- W U N O— a I- W W 2 H Z W� U 1- _ O~ z a ir awl rival Earawivato OWN VIM r . 111111% Z CC L C < W ..j0 O 0 (J) W • I F_ • u_ j 0 CC D LL. ° U-I Z H O Z H JO LLI u 0 O Y • H W w 0 H - 0 Z O U) I o z <• W CL 2 J O CD U) u) W W H W � I Q U p d W Z = F- O ZF- W U O — O H W 2 tL O • Z W U U— F- O ~ z ru 0,.w raw mew tuna ail as .-.k..,•..,! ry,4.,.‘ ?,..•:!, : ?...,k e 4 1 .,; . ,,.-„, I ,;•,. I . .„,v -i , ,,,,/', . .. .1%•••4 .., . 7_,,...,.. ,Ik-, .. i'.,/,'"N'''1).,.. izo 1 ' — 1 1 ,',,. - • . 0 TA' • - , ,' 0 _ 4 1, ,‘ z, !p.i..1 - I 4 :i:., '`v ,• ..% ..;,. • C. . 1 • i ` - • ' )7' .,? 4 11' • ''`'' Y'.f-/.4, -,( rf' ;, , . - - • , ',. ',' / II.' ) Ss : 4 l'• '' ,, c ' .* ' ..r. " ' ..- i. • '14 P. •'17,.„...'i.y'') ; . .; .t',,' .# ' • .... • • " I • ,, : ';' **. .el' 4 ' —.... -, l". i.- C ?')" ,• ,Y 1 4r, %t -1 .,V; , 'E > :i., • ' ' ' ,i „k i e'•,,)' v ' r); 4.1 4;4 '', • - l' t,‘",#)'„,,s,,,i, $' „. ..' ,!..',.'4 •+,"-;,‘, ;'..1 ',/ : i i • I ) . 4 ' !1`i.jt.' ;.. .1 , .- ,i‘ ? .r. - . , * ; ., 1 ,- ... i '.." 4 •A''' .1 ■`, LS e..••1:./7,t1:11"';11.....''' '''''',/'. ; ; ; 7 . 1 • 7".1-% 1 : .i ...'l °. f 4 i 4i .- * ell i,.4 1 „ .!, , „ • . 9 .., .,„ l ' 4r '-,, .- L — „,. '.,-'..r 4 4, 4 ...,' /; f I /' '' t1.1 a`f..e • -• /, ,• 1 i„t r • . 4 • , / 1 1, ; 17 R. ' e • • 1, • p' :11,.; 41141 t• r' " •••••1.•- .01 .j1* ". •. .. 4 !.:44 c: l 'ir ,1 - '.- , _ )4 ... 1 I , - . 4- ,..:.;s•";:' it:' Al I .. .... ,- , .,,,,, ,.1., ,..■4.. .. if -4 ? ••• , ' +I. 40 - ' ' s 7 e f ' -" • • • - ),X 4.- ,--.4'1 , 2 . /i' ,41/ ), 1 .." ....- .,- .,0.......• ,,,;„..: t.. F xpik , e • 4 et v v t 1,:.%:i .i:ti ck' • t,, 41 , • •, ...1 J i .7%..... ;, .. ,,,,, ,:s . , . „. , ...„',......, Is ..--1.. • ''' ' ,..'' -.• ' ' •/ •„1 ,. A d, .r 1 1 ' :92 . ,.. • ''4, , ;.-t-,11; • IZ • A. .... , . .4. :,;`,...;" ,, -i,.(`,,.t c t'l 1?:, 4 7...--:,;•4..c .. ,ti, ; -, -, f:R . Le ' ;....;•,- . C it ' . ....` r ; . %It .1 ' . , ;11 • .1.6ff .. . -.V.S.....,0. , .1 . ' ;'•i .Z:* k4..Sil: t ' 1: . ' ' tkr 1 $;.*:' 4 '-i FN t.'•:: Pr..4.- i ,, .:.,,'.. . f .*: .;,:: A , ., , ' - '1., 4.1 i . k , ,,,, k.- , f;.-4 ,. .. 1 1 , ..., ,:. N ., ? —:.:„-...• , ........... ti .fr 7 . '',\"*. • ,. .1 ' '''''''? ' ■ ir ...•, r 7 'II- ' ,,- , • „,,,, C - '.,.. •., • t At 1, • , '. ''','" - 5' ,•■• 4 4 '274; :. •: .,,. 1 N..' Icle ' ;N,O, ,4 -.... .. 1 I ,:•1 { df, t . s • ...% • . ''' .,?"' i r• ,p!...4 k ■ , , y•-• z. •• • , - .,,,,, ,:=1 - ,r4 - 4"•4';' A•t.,:";.A..".. 1 . 1 :1t1S I S1.4( ) t.,,.., ' r, ■;1:"..42! '' - '''.; " ty,i\ t je.•)":4: 9 1:- (L, . • -. • • tA. * Ot4 •kE . , %h■ • t s , ,,i•-,... k ,i.,.., ,,, ,.:;:.., 4 0 ,.....,...,,,,...„ 1 ., ,, .. ,,,, C .,..., iv& r 1 1 a '-z...4 l' ... z < • 1- W tY 2 _J 00 (0 CI (/) W W F- U II_ W O r rx u_ < co ±" a z H O Z H W w 0 • w O — • H W w — w F O I z Ct 4 7 . 1. 1 • * "e 5 4 r• t NL ef ,e l'• • r./ • ■ , 4 , ^ , •; ' ;4 ':‘,!" ar• ' - • • f ' " , 4;c• , 11,,• , . %rt .- p • • t l • °I l . ' 4- " • , r-s :c$ ? ,` , ; • t '/.. -1 P.,f1.' -• - i..'! ; ' % : if.' • -, ,1 ;" i 7 " 1Y ?f4;•u.", 14 , ,..'''..:"' • ., - >,1 ,.. , ././ I -- . tr;.Y,. ' ..''.... ":' . 0,illt, -- ... , t"', 1 1.2- - ti.-. . ' -- ... . -. ' .. .- ... 1( • .. 1 - 4 ' -.-.---.! 3 - 4. ' 'v.. .--- ,• ,..r , , l'• --' ' . ' . • , •••;,e. ; • - vA, ?-3 • 'sr . • • • ••• • .!, " • ' r • • t • ^".. 11 4 . .r r t.:* 1-;?, 4. t tt ja" • * .7( .' • . • • "„, • ,:i 1!) "ii • , PFIWeriveso'"" ••■ • *174. •-• r .. 7: • , • y.-1 • 7et -6A6 47'14 • ? - • k Ar.„, " • • • ;:r 1.-;v ‘`,IN* • • 7, - . • 7,4; • .? . • • • • - • • ' -" • L • , - - t • ., . ,74 ; - • • , • e ' ' - , , r or, • -••r • ••• .; • ..•:ft ‘• ....r i'''.. . ." it • .., ...„. ..1 1 ,:' .. :44...„ .,.... . -:" 1 . ; 1 7;J: ,::.- .. .,4 • : ' I t.'' ,‘ '... ' ■ ,-- • ^ - -,e.• I ..&' it . ''' .....' ' -:....%... ; '2.1. ' ,:',,' # rf ;!,-7)'- • •,, ' .K..0-' ' . • t. ,,C.,,,. ,. ,.', -‘,,,,,, .„„.,.. .., ....., .... ..4 .'.:', t.,.4, , ,, , •., % , ., _ ,. , .. ., „ . . , .;?......1. 1;• , ,." ,..:(1 .., . ,Z..r ." r .e .1). t.L. :" - :•,r.'1......... ,, ,/ , r yrt, .r. ? : , • ••• :''.; ...t'y • „... i - ^ . r., t..)/ , ','. ,.:'#7 ;, , t , ^ $^ .h ,- 1. 'it ,', re . . ..., ` ", ,•'.."!^1. ' d i ' ' ^' ' ' . '' ',,, • t - ^ I ' • ^^:: ^ t • .. ' r ^ ' ' i,',^1' .- . : ^I' "'"=ir - -,-.. .2 -?.. ' -t?' .., '4. ,,, • • , •,,', , t . Ef. F . ,. ' , .• -I , . y .• , *** ''.* ' • , _ ..,,, .. - • `. • . ••:, ••••., s • / . •• -• . !,• '",,, • • ) ‘.: 4`1_ '', i .. 7'.-.• -2. ... ...,=._- . ..;'•,.'.. ,..,3•%•,.ly \ - .. ,... ,..=• .4t,:3 : , . - ." . - • L - l '"' I- • , . ., 1 ••••.1: . -, ' '' t ...,,,, • tc.: r r • , ; • • , -. '' . ''- ' • - •c .. • --.;" ';:". -. • -- tr•i -Z tl.t f ' . • .- ''' .:I 1 Vci J r • , •■• . • . ......!, A ' . ; - ' o; - ' • ' ' • ' kr e, - • • r,...„ 1" ....9c•;;••• • E • `;‘,.. i • • ' ... • ... ' ..k ;1 . ;."., •‘• .3 ..• . -1 ‘.,__\ .'. ... ■1• F • • .'-'''' ' ' - ` s t-• . -.". ••,, ,.;.e" , .r :',1/4. '.4 iv '• , , :, c !••••••,',.,,, ... ..... ..1-1 At... .. • - -4, 1.:-• C.11 ?;„, . .•• co • . 1 ; . " -1.::, •:-.! • ' tl. . . ••• '' st, ''' ' : .:.. '''.. .F 1 : .'-1'. . , • • , . ' - 4 r 5 ..... .. ...• ,. • ,c , .!.. • • •• -r.....: ,... -4 • . • , jc.-: - ..-..r,c.,.:•. ." . -.■::,,,',...' ... i;)/,•.: .,4t ■ i.• ' .":.,..••; -:, .....r. , , • .,i . - , . • -•- • • 7/ . 1 . .... '•-•• ,; -• .E A. '• ,.....,,,,! • i,:, .1 • • . ., ,.. • ., .....,...._ • ., , , . , . ...;..,,,,, .., --:..• • - r: .• ,. .. • •• ••••;_ • 'T • • ; .171 1.14:1 • • i ,t 4 . la' • ' 47 .,./ a V a 4 ' ".: • *; : .. ' '.; ; ?' 7- •;' -',. ;i'_' - „r .. . tydi A!, i T . , - , • - OR - ..7";.- * A ' X• • ' ' • 1 ' i' I ' t .,i 4 :: l.?' .2 ,.., 4: k r , ,.. ot . . 4 1 Y 01 ) ;„ ...1 6 , .' • .„... . : . , .....1 -...- ,•9 .a: .,-', . ,*.i.•r, ..--- * • .. • ■• f '4,%-l'', 4 . •••‘./ ..,• ;•.; ..e.e.: , )i •••;-. '., ' ../^ 1.7,.., 1.4.-'ir. '' trg ',":-•:‘ ti i ,,;;-$., '•:,:, . .A. ,.,, ..t._, ).. 4 t ,-),.„4,, ":.' . - - J i '■1 iROY' , -;,,•015-, : .."--'% ' , '14 o - 'A, . , -1r-ot• . 4;44 A ,,-, .-:- . ,, ' ' • '' . „ 7. .,,.. ril, 1. ... .: ... a ,.; .4 z . . - c. - •' ai • .q.,,:t0;1,q...,.*T o' , ,- 1 :V. '''' • 4 . .t. t ,i... •••,. kA 4 ., r ,,,,, 411,z2iol .,. ., .f t *4 . ii• . ■ ' • '...../.1, ; 0'. ,- ;.r - : 1 # v -.1.;. ,.,...t. ..,;., i.. . .,..,.. 1'7C ..,..k:`,..... ........-....i' • ,, ..t., ... / ;141 til4 ,li R. - ,.. •''. , 11111. z Z W LU _1 0 00 (J) a W W u_ Lu 0 U- < E c3 Z 1- 0 Z 1- W w u) C) -- O H UJ u j DE 0 UL. -- (/) 1= I 0 1- z Z Ui 6 D _I C.) 00 (/) (O W W I u_ uj 0 cc ri u_ I a I. LI Z HO Z LLI u j O H O SL ) L uj LL - 0 Z C.) W o 1- Z C Lurrp - alliano Project T fee Remo*i.„ Pics Page 1 From: "D Ward" <starviewii©hotmail.com> To: <clumb©ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 7/31/03 9:20AM Subject: Galliano Project Tree Removal Pics Hi Carol, Sorry this took me a day or two but I don't think my computer likes the hot weather! Here are the pictures we discussed. Almost every one of the tree stumps protruding from the hillside on the Galliano Project have now been bulldozed out of the hillside. We are very concerned about the stability of the entire slope due to the unauthorized tree removal and bulldozing of the property. Thanks again for staying in touch with me on this project and listening to my concerns. I'm looking forward to meeting with you tomorrow morning. Hope you're enjoying the cooler weather! Best regards, Michele Rick 206 - 244 -6363 The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http: / /join.msn.com / ?page= features /junkmail NOTICE: |F THE OOCUK8ENT\N THIS FRAME \S LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT Z C W J 00 U � U) L11 J = H U) LL. W L Q H • W Z O Z I- W • W U 0 O - D W • W tL O .• Z W co OH Z :1 • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT \ � , 0 e NOTICE: |F THE [�OCUK8ENT|N THIS FRAME |SLESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE |T|S DUE T0 THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ■, • < . I— :1— tj re 2 0 • 0 cn • w W I -I E- U) u_ w 0 .71 co z H 0 z w w O co 0 O H w w • 0 r . u. Lii o 1- z • •;;. • - • • • • .• ,Mserr,v.rWAVY,'Wri...1.MVIMP,SofiNtln, - " - "...4 71.7r,z , mr,p , t1 , , , , ,,,, zrrzm w ee rmlv. , v. revm .ttcr;ile?. ‘nrt,"*.M.`. 0 3 4 1 0 M4. 4 MMINIV0.?r-tIMILVV-4V.f.V.V. < . I w 2 —J 0 0 0 co ca CO al LLI - F_ CD u_ ill 0 2 u_ -±- I- In Z t.- l-0 Z I- W jj D 0 0 (0) c) -- 0 I-- w z UJ uj 0 -- u. 0 92 : 0 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ix NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. } NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. r a Ma MIN/ z 0 cn z 0 59 3 m m c 7s 0 0 a c c g mm H Z O -I 2 m O C ,, 1 7J O M - no ) r- m M C1) O (/) O 0 0 l c g 7 , --t, 71 T. 0 NOTICE: |F THE OOCUK8ENT|N THIS FRAME |S LESS [�LEAF�THAN THIS NOTICE |T|G DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. I F H Z • W .j0 O 0 (0 COW W —I I_ w 0 < (2( W Z I-0 Z F— Ui • 0 0 O D- O 1- w w ° - 0 • z O 2 I= I O 1- Z Z I I- • 6 0 O 0 U) U) W uJ —ii- ) LL u j 0 • < a Lu z I- Z I— a '— Iii Ui u j L 0 Z O cf) O I I Z CL 2 _I 0 00 U) (/) W W _1 1— u_ 0 2 w < u) -± w z I-0 z W w 2 C/ 0 — Ca 1— W w 0 1— ILl 1— 11- 0 w — 1 0 /— Z Z Ce Lii _i C.) O 0 CD 0 (i) W t._ CD u_ w 0 2 ?- g 5 u.. co a ▪ U- Z I— 0 Z u j D 0 0 H W w 0 1. = L i" 0 Z w 0 1- z • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. yt Sp ' ft r f R 10 EXPASION JOINT TD CPREMOLDED TYP.) NOTES; 5/8" CRUSHED ROCK SCORE JOINTS SECTION A —A EXPANSION JOINT ELIMINATE IF GUTTER & APRON ARE POURED MONOLITHIC ' 04R y Sp. ee R 2" Min. or more as directed. Driveway (Max. RecoMended Grade Is 15X) City of Tukwila Top of Curb at Driveway CURB DETAIL 1. INSPECTION REQUIRED BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. AT LEAST 24 HOUR NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS FOR INSPECTION. 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS B OR BttitM THAN 5 1/2 SACK, 3000 PSI. 3. ALL DRIVEWAY APRONS SHALL BE A MIN. 6" THICK. 4. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APWA/WSDOT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 5. REMOVAL OF EXIST1NG CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER OR SIDEWALK SHALL BE TO THE NEXT EXPANSION JOINT; SCORE JOINTS MUST BE SAW CUT AND REPLACED WITH EXPANSION JOINT. 6. DRIVEWAYS WITH HIGH VOLUME (AS NOTED BY CITY ENGINEER) MAY BE APPROVED FOR INTERSECTION TYPE ACCESS. 7. TURNING RESTRICTIONS MAY BE APPLIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. DATE: 11/15/96 HANDFORM ALONG RADIUS FOR SMOOTH TRANSITION COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY Not to .c.1. RS -9 TREES PLANT LIST Galliano's Cucina Restaurant 14201 Interurban Avenue So. Tukwila, WA 98118 Key Botanical Name SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS 1. Arctostaphylos uva -ursi Vancouver Jade 2. Aucuba japonica Mr. Goldstrike 3. Azalea exbury Dawn Chorus 4. Azalea Glacier 5. Azalea kurume hino- crimson 6. Cotoneaster lowfast 7. Escallonia rubra 8. Gaultheria shallon 9. Hydrangea serrata Bluebird 10. Mahonia aquifolium 11. Mahonia nervosa 12. Pieris japonica 13. Pieris japonica Valley Rose 14. Polystichum munitum 15. Prunus laurocerasus Otto Luyken 16. Viburnum tinus Compactum 17. Vinca minor A. Acer platanoides Columnare Columnar Norway Maple B. Cornus kousa Chinese Dogwood C. Cuppressus sempervirons glauca Blue Italian Cypress D. Prunus cerasifera Krauter Purple Leaf Plum Vesuvius E. Pyrus calleryana Redspire F. Thuja plicata G. Tsuga canadensis H. Washingtonia filifera Common Name Vancouver Jade Kinnickinick Mr. Goldstrike Aucuba White Exbury Hybrid White Glen Dale Hybrid Red Kurume Hybrid Lowfast Cotoneaster Red Escallonia Salal Bluebird Hydrangea Oregongrape Mountain Mahonia Japanese Pieris Valley Rose Pieris Sword Fern Otto Luyken Spring Bouquet Viburnum Common Periwinkle Redspire Flowering Pear Western Red Cedar Canadian Hemlock California Fan Palm RECEIVED DEVEL OPMENT Order Size Quan. 1 Gallon 54 3 Gallon 6 5 Gallon 3 2 Gallon 26 2 Gallon 61 2 Gallon 53 2 Gallon 9 1 Gallon 33 5 Gallon 3 3 Gallon 3 2 Gallon 100 5 Gallon 5 5 Gallon 2 1 Gallon 17 3 Gallon 75 5 Gallon 15 1 Gallon 207 2" Caliper 3 6 -8' 2 8 -10' 3 2" Caliper 6 2" Caliper 4 6 -8' 3 6 -8" 6 4 -6' 2 ADDENDUM ADDITIONAL TREES ADDED TO PLANT LIST Galliano's Cucina Restaurant 14201 Interurban Avenue So. Tukwila, WA 98118 C EIVED 1'0 2003 MMUNITY , .. , .VELOPMENT Additional trees south of proposed parking at base of slope to replace trees removed. Acer circinatum Vine Maple 6 -8' 5 Acer rubrum Bowhall Bowhall Columnar Red Maple 2" Caliper 4 Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar 6 -8' 2 Total of eleven additional trees plus six previously specified trees at the base of the slope. i2 s:It L` :11 .44 , IbvKiFi • z ;t- z W 0O : CO W = F- WO 2 g 1 = d : I- _ z _�:. I-0 Z I- 2 uj 0 CI 0 - ,0 H: WW - 0 Cu . z: O I- NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. I , I l 3 S010 . I st itice / / / / / / / / / / / RESTRAUNT BUILDING (NOT ACTUAL SHAPE 0 BUILDING) Q a�Er-7 ®♦ G -5 GP- GPs3, O EP -1 • �)0 EP -8 • . / / 'GP -9 GP -10 • I / / / / / I / / / / / / • FORMER -PUMP ISANDS `♦ FORMER TANK • BASIN 191. 4 E Z ''' f i I I (I I I I �I.I I IllJll�l11J.�I.II� l l l l l l lll�lll) / / • / / • / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / E C. 0) 12034 1341h COURT NE, SUITE 1D2 REDMOND, WASHINGTON PH (425) 372 - 1800 /FAX (425) 372 -1850 JOB NUMBER: 01 EL.27482.03 . I ,� , C: i • ' �� i, V r IIII I11I)!!II IuIIJrll 11.I.11fll, I11.111ll IIJ1.�1i� 1(11 Dili / / / / / / / / / / DRAWN BY: LEGEND 1 PREPARED FOR: FORMER 7- ELEVEN FACILITY NO. 27482 14221 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON - - - — SITE BOUNDARY EP-80 FORMER SAMPLE LOCATION GP -10-4- GEOPROBE LOCATION (SECOR) ® CATCH BASIN 61 FIRE HYDRANT $. SIMMONS 0 CHECKED BY: FILEPATHR: \CAD \CAD_FILEs \PROJECTS \7 ELEVEN\27482 \27482(sP).owc MODIFIED BY SSIMMONS AT JAN 22, 2004 - 13:48 50 APPROXIMATE SCALE (FEET) SITE PLAN WITH SOIL PROBE LOCATIONS AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES APPROVED BY: 100 FIGURE: DATE: 12115103 PATH ON LEFT GONG 1'G 'IV .vs L.k. r4T15 i0 rU►VAN0r ilU I W 4 . ! -- Orin Ll I C a'• 0:0 a:;: 1 q CAI .,. -..N! v r.I01.«.w. 41 ..:iJ.4d.a.o I _ ' *d11. . :� „�_ , ").• I . ' Ir Mr f, 4441' M ina, a wry 4 st- ' t:11}f�J�`>f , ,;�• Az • 4LWA:. PAW/1E04410.; cr:lht - :I�• ` ` 11 l�' / PRIMO I.waOC.47i .au�_'onl� Lv (K 1 27 _.. P.Y.R.V£ urey044 f;ED+a3Rg,. :; s_ I xoroNEtiSTEQ: ?guilds' om'Ene.4.KRAurY VeSuv 'mom' ai • M4110141A.. o'.J .4 Pnv 1 i4 vim dA . CAM 4 MIER ' cni..t..R- (•M.• Ref; .r:II.:: - .- •-- AZM.et. G:.•cltta. lO YI NC& M WOO. '.f•9.'::.. AZAL •XQuRY PAWN . GuORLYi ..3 nix,...) CAW/soer461.5•3._. 6 001.4 • NE:2Y0a c :.22. ArOP.. "RU5R►SM. hOWN1i1. "A ARC1 11)it(►P.431;tat::,'uvla ": VILmm VAt:1,tA Np . JAOg • 07 ' RGba,',i4.. ,1 15.` 444.4% .�:3 :::.,' : ' f't.aws; • �: /j41RT1!3:$O.S6';. r +S i ' i ig rjuVO tt a:" • I WAallt i4 u'iR:4'::t:. . ' ;, ''' Vii ku±atnMl 6 1 I. I:I.I I I I;C�:I I:I"I IT:I Inch .. 1/18 vL�Pl� 96 bl: EL. Z�. LbO6`' 6 I I I LI I I I Li l I I I.LU I l l i,I �I i1 II I I I Ll l l.Ij LI I I 1 11111.11 IiI I I I LI I I I l I LI I l Ia 1 1 1 L . ti q Z 11 1 11 111. I1III 111111IIII 'I.IIIIIIIIIILIIIIIV iiiiIIIII ExI:IHG _C7a�c :sMaeT.'1nees..w /. • .aacitarra!itile :lM' k%1ST: 5100,0auc - TYPE' STATE Of WAMK1,101o: AE G i$r ERCD . ui:Ali" K' IIICI •/ MONO,: y .Ct 1NICw1{• hk It/.P t* Awa, ti- . gy...r.:1.A1440- 4=1.i • 1 .4A 414- '7 tiVer44 A:, ptitT.I.zr7 T.A11#-,44 * • ZL. 614.441K 1114i-i49'..74r.497.t.;:11.070*.1 -k- 4,4f.ir • • 1.1 I iioIii1i • 9 _ p HC Z :IL I1011111 illtlitli1111111.01111j11(iliiilli111ill!IIIIIIIiill111111_1_, 'MITI I 1,11111 I 1.1 I [11 I I ' • — MAR 2 7 2003 COMMUNITY ds- DEVELOPMENT —003