The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L03-079 - ROBB ERIC - SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD REZONEROBB REZONE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT COMPREHENISVE LAND USE AMENDMENT 6550 & 6542 S 154 L03 -079 MEETING DATE: HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: SEPA DETERMINATION: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN ZONE DESIGNATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION March 25, 2004 May 20, 2004 (Expected) Stall' Rcpt - -PC -Robb( L03- 079)(3.19.04 briefing) Notice published in the Seattle Times, 2/13/04 Notice to surrounding property owners, 5/6/04 (Expected) Site posted, 5/6/04 (Expected) Notice published in the Seattle Times, 5/6/04 (Expected) L03 -079 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) Eric Robb/Barghausen Consulting Engineers Change Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard (Tax Parcel #s 0003200017, 0003200018, 0003200019) SEPA Determination not issued at this time Low Density Residential (LDR) Low Density Residential (LDR) Rebecca Fox A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application B. Planning Commission Minutes (6/26/03) C. Council Minutes (9/2/03) D. Letter from Rebecca Fox (10/28/03) E. Letter from Rebecca Fox (1/26/04) F. Aerial Map with 2' contours G. Zoning Map H. Site Survey I. Sensitive Areas Map -I - Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 BACKGROUND FINDINGS Staff Rcpt - -1'C -Robb( L03- 079)(3.19.04 briefing) Project History The applicant Eric Robb proposes to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map designations at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard (S. 154 St.), Tukwila from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). (Attachment A) This is the second time around for the proposal. The applicant originally requested re- designation from LDR to 0 during the 2002 -2003 annual amendment process (File #L02- 067). After its review in June, 2003 the Planning Commission recommended deferring the issue until 2004 pending the resolution of access and encroachment issues. In September, 2003, the City Council rejected the request, based on concerns over: 1) difficult vehicular access, especially egress and; 2) encroachment of portions of the building and retaining wall at 6550 Southcenter Boulevard from approximately 12 to 20 feet onto the adjacent lot to the north. (Attachment B) Mr. Robb was told that he could resubmit his application for consideration if he fully resolved the access and encroachment issues by the December 31, 2003 application deadline. (Attachment C) In October, 2003, Mr. Robb provided a letter from adjacent property owner Gerald Schneider who agreed in principle to allow the use of his property for access from Robb's property. Staff returned the document with a letter requesting Mr. Robb to resolve fully all access and encroachment issues, and to provide documentation before reapplying for consideration by December 31, 2003. He was also told that he needed to resolve property encroachment issues whether or not he resubmitted his application. (Attachment D) Mr. Robb reapplied for consideration on December 31, 2003 (File #L03 -079). The new application has the same letter from Gerald Schneider, but no new information or documentation about resolution of the access issues, and the property encroachment problems. Staff sent Mr. Robb a letter on January 26, 2004 requesting resolution of outstanding issues (Attachment E) On March 15, 2003, the City Council voted to pass this issue to the Planning Commission for further review, if Mr. Robb submits an application for a Boundary Line Adjustment. The Boundary Line Adjustment is to be submitted by May 3, 2004 and signed by the adjacent property owner. Vicinity /Site Information The affected properties include three individual tax lots with a combined area of approximately .74 acres. Two separate single- family residences face Southcenter 2 Surrounding Uses Land uses immediately adjacent to the site are: North Single family residential; wooded vacant land South — Southcenter Boulevard and I -405 Interchange East — Southcenter Boulevard and I -405 Interchange West — Office /commercial; park; single- family residential Staff Rept - -PC -Robb( L03- 079)(3.19,04 briefing) Boulevard and sit well above the roadway. One single- family residence occupies Tax Lot #003200018 (6542 Southcenter Boulevard /6542 S. 154 St.) and the other residence is located on Tax Lot #003200019 (6550 Southcenter Boulevard/6550 S. 154 St.). The two houses share a steep driveway which provides the only access to Southcenter z Boulevard. A third house, located at 6532 Southcenter Boulevard, but not included in the = z request, also uses the driveway to enter and leave the property. Ce Lijn J U Located in a 40' access and utility easement owned by the State of Washington 0 o cn Department of Transportation, the existing driveway is approximately 12 to 13' wide co w with a masonry wall flanking either side to a width of approximately 25'. Measurements taken from a site survey show that the driveway is approximately 22.5% grade. w p I more or less bisects the two residential properties, and lacks the 2 to 3% landing 2 r approaching the sidewalk and intersection, that is typically needed for commercial g Q purposes. (Attachment F —Aerial Photo) a = w A survey requested by the City of Tukwila in 2003 shows that portions of the building z l- a retaining wall at 6550 Southcenter Boulevard encroach from approximately 12 to 20 z o feet onto the adjacent lot to the north (Attachment G—Robb Site Survey, and Attachment LU H— Zoning with 2" Contours) v o ON The site contains steep slopes. The Sensitive Areas Overlay shows that over 50% of the 0 i– site is located within a Class 3 area of potential geologic instability. ( See Attachment I— i v Sensitive Areas Map) Class 3 areas are those where "landslide potential is high, which w I - 0 include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively w z impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 o percent." o 1 ' z Land uses between 500 and 1,000 feet from the site include the following: North— Condominiums South — Commercial retail and service station East —I -405 Interchange, Green River, hotel /motel West — Commercial office, single- family residential REVIEW CRITERIA Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear 3 Staff Rcpt - -PC -Robb( L03- 079)(3.19.04 briefing) compliance with the criteria that follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 1) Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? This request highlights the competing issues of housing and economic development. The Comprehensive Plan's highest priority objective is the following: "To improve and sustain residential neighborhood quality and livability." Transportation Corridor Goal 8.4 (Southcenter Boulevard) calls for "A corridor of low rise offices, residences, with localized commercial uses at major intersections all of which act as a buffer to the low- density residential neighborhoods to the north." 2) If the issue is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a public need for the proposed change? The issue is adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Tukwila has good supply of land which is zoned to allow office use. Nearby areas also have large sites and sufficient auto access. The Tukwila Urban Center Market Analysis (ECONorthwest, 3/02) indicates relatively lower vacancy rates relative to elsewhere in the South King County Market. The demand is likely to be lower in 2004. There is no clear need for additional office space. The requested map change would remove three lots from the Low Density Residential (LDR) designation and add them to the Office (0) designation/zone. This would permit the Office (0) to run continuously along Southcenter Boulevard to the I -405 Interchange. No development is proposed at this time; any future office projects would require demolishing or converting two existing single - family units. If the property is redesignated to 0, more intensive future development would generate additional traffic and noise. City Engineer Brian Shelton states that the steep driveway would need improvement to support future development, since the driveway is barely workable for the three houses it now serves. Sight distance is inadequate for exiting the property. In addition, with wet or icy pavement, vehicles will have difficulty entering or leaving the property. Leaving the site is especially difficult, since a vehicle which cannot stop would be hazardous to pedestrians or vehicles along Southcenter Boulevard (Memo, June 6, 2003). These factors would be especially problematic with the increased traffic volumes which would be produced by future office development. During the 2003 review, the Traffic Study suggested that it might be possible to mitigate the driveway problems by developing alternate access via the adjacent Schneider Homes property once the City right -of -way was vacated. Mr. Schneider submitted a letter agreeing in principle to allow access from Mr. Robb's property. When Mr. Robb resubmitted his Comprehensive Plan/Rezone application on December 31, 2003, no additional information was provided regarding: 1) the location or legal 4 z w fr y ,J O 00 CD 0 J w • 0 = a w Z = zI- W O • — O I— ww tL 0 w z OH z Staff' Rcpt - -1 C -Robb( L03- 079)(3.19.04 briefing) description of the easement; 2) which of Mr. Sclmeider's properties would be used for the access easement, or 3) what area would be paved. The easement had not been recorded with King County. Further, the street vacation along Macadam Road from Southcenter Boulevard to Old Bluff Road requested by Mr. Schneider expired September 30, 2003. 3) Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? The Comprehensive Plan identifies the Southcenter Boulevard corridor as a buffer for low density residential neighborhoods to the north. The housing currently located on the site already functions as a buffer since it sits significantly above the roadway, and is somewhat removed from the single - family neighborhood to the north. A retaining wall along Southcenter Boulevard separates the property from the roadway More intensive development at this site is problematic since site conditions include steep slopes and steep access. 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? Traffic, circulation and site access are primary concerns in considering redesignating this site from Low Density Residential to Office. Although no specific development is proposed at this time, the City of Tukwila requested that the applicant prepare a traffic study to give a general idea of the potential effects of office development on the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis compared the impacts of office, medical /dental and retail, and selected a medical/dental use for evaluation, since its projected average parking need was the highest of the three uses. The Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared in 2003 for the first application, considers a 9,000 square foot facility, which requires 37 parking spaces. Tukwila's Zoning Code requires a minimum of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of usable space, for a minimum of 27 spaces. The Traffic Report suggested that parking could be provided by terraced areas with stairways, but does not take into account the steep and unstable slopes which cover much of the site. No allowance was made for on -site circulation or landscaping. The properties' development potential for residential or office use will be limited by site considerations including: • Relatively small site size, • steep slopes, • potential geological instability and • safety concerns relating to the difficult access to and from Southcenter Boulevard The 2003 Traffic Impact Study suggests that it might be possible to mitigate the driveway problems by developing alternate access via the adjacent Schneider Homes property. Existing housing could remain until replaced with office development. The property lies in an area with high potential for geologic instability, so any construction would require extra care. Site conditions make it difficult to accommodate more intensive development. Once built, any office use will generate additional traffic which would enter via the very 5 Alternatives for Action After holding its hearing, the Planning Commission could: • Recommend approval; • Modify the proposal • Recommend denial Staff Rcpt - -PC -Robb( L03- 079)(3.19.04 briefing) steep driveway. Any new intensified use will require a revision to the property access for safety purposes. CONCLUSIONS Mr. Robb's new application does not resolve fully site access and property encroachment z problems. These issues caused the proposal to be rejected in 2003. In September 2003, ,1 z the City Council required that Mr. Robb resolve both issues before submitting a new ce w application. 6 D ,J 0 The letter from Gerald Schneider agrees in principle to allow Mr. Robb to use one of his co w properties for access, but questions about the access remain to be fully addressed. The -J '- street vacation near Schneider Homes expired in late 2003. co u-. u 0 The encroachment has not been cleaned up. A boundary line adjustment has not been r applied for or granted. Without clear property lines being established and recorded, it is co D imp to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations or maps. = w F- _ z'— Property encroachment and setback issues must be resolved whether or not the Planning 1- 0 Commission recommends approval. W uj D The applicant has stated his intention to fully take care of the access and encroachment 0 c issues. Due to the cost involved in improving property access, he has asked for an ❑ 1— indication that the request will be approved if the access and encroachment issues are i 0 successfully resolved. Specifically, he is requesting "conditional approval" of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. The City Attorney has indicated this would be .. z possible. The specific condition and time frame could be placed at a later date, if the 0 Planning Commission wishes recommend this amendment on for approval. 0 1— I. Recommendation The SEPA Determination has not been made at this time due to the range of amendments to be considered. After the SEPA review is complete, staff will prepare a recommendation and provide it to the Planing Commission for the May 20, 2004 hearing. After Planning Commission review, the proposal will return to the City Council for a public hearing and decision as part of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update. 6 z TO: File FROM: REBECCA FOX SUBJ: Eric Robb Comp Plan /Rezone Request L03- 079 -- Office designation @ 6550 & 6542 S. 154th Please refer to file L02 -067, Mr. Robb's first request for "Office" designation. The City Council deferred Robb's application until 2004. Please note that regardless of whether or not he requests a comp plan change & rezone, Mr. Robb is supposed to get a boundary line adjustment to address the encroachment of his building onto his north neighbor's property. (Parcel encroached upon-- #3597000520...Owner in 2003: Michael Alhadeff) Repecc #Fox - Eric Robb -- Withdrawing Comprehensive Plan amendment Page 1 From: Rebecca Fox To: Eric LaBrie Date: 3/23/04 3:15PM Subject: Eric Robb -- Withdrawing Comprehensive Plan amendment Eric, We will use this e-mail to confirm that Eric Robb is withdrawing his application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment consideration. Mr. Robb still must resolve his property encroachment and setback issues as soon as possible. He will need to apply for a Boundary Line Adjustment. Thank you. Rebecca Fox Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> "Eric LaBrie" <elabrie @barghausen.com> 03/22/04 01:36PM »> Rebecca, After the City Council meeting the other evening, we were left with the feeling that although the application would be processed, Council would not look favorably on it, and Eric's fate would be in the hands of others, specifically Gerald Schneider. Since Gerald is not pursuing the prior R/W vacation or development of his property at this time, Eric Robb would be left trying to solve his access problems as well as Gerald's. Based on the Council's comments, Eric Robb will not be pursuing the Comp. Plan Amendment this year. He will continue working on resolving the encroachment issue with his neighbor and will keep the City informed as to his progress. Please withdraw his application from this year's packet. Thanks for your assistance, Eric LaBrie Original Message From: Rebecca Fox [mailto:rfox anci.tukwila.wa.usl Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:20 AM To: elabrie Subject: Posting Robb Site Hi Eric, Eric Robb needs to post his site by 3/29/04 so that people can know about his requested comp plan /zoning code change. Information about the sign requirements are found in the comp plan amendment application. (He posted the property last year, so he can use the physical sign from the last time.) Please have someone come into the office later in the week to pick up Rebec*gox - Eric Robb--Withdrawing Comprehensive Plan amendment Page 2 Rebecca Fax Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206-431-3683 (tel) 206-431-3665 (fax) rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us laminated project information sheets to affix/staple to the board. Contact me if you have questions. CC: Ericrobb@comcast.net z 00. w. WI. .w ?7: g•FI .0 a - I- a •Z 2 D: E UJ w: 2 0! — 0: 11.1 co. (.) • • I= Eric Robb 6550 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 March 3, 2004 Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Dear Mr. Robb: Enclosed is a staff report to the City Council and a copy of a public meeting notice which was published on the Seattle Times. Per the attached, the Tukwila City Council will hold a public meeting on March 15, 2004 to consider your request for changes in Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation for your properties. At this time, you and other members of the public are invited to speak on behalf of your proposal. After the public meeting, the City Council will decide whether or not to refer your request on to the Planning Commission for review, to reject the request or to modify it. If the City Council decides to refer your request to the Planning Commission, you will be required to post your property with project and hearing information. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 if you have questions. Sincerely, "PC Rebecca Fox Tukwila Department of Community Development Eric. Ciz of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Steven M. Mullet, Mayor z Notice of Public Meeting on Comprehensive Plan Amendments m W re 2 The City of Tukwila is considering changes to its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, _J o including: co o co Ill • Comprehensive Plan amendment request from La Pianta LLC to amend Tukwila 1 South element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. co w w 0 • Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone request from Sabey Corporation to g 23 change Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation from LDR to C/LI for the u _ property located south of S. 126th Street and between Tukwila International = w Boulevard and 34th Avenue South. This property is part of the Department of Z 1 Homeland Security property currently under construction at Intergate East. 0 zr • Comprehensive Plan and rezone request from Eric Robb to change the designation 2 o f rom Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) for properties at 6550 and 6542 o FP - Southcenter Boulevard. o w w Tukwila City Council will hold a public meeting to give residents and businesses an u_ o opportunity to comment on whether the proposed amendments shall be forwarded to the z Planning Commission for further study. There will be additional opportunities for public v co i nput after this meeting. 0 I- z The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendments from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Minnie Dhaliwal, Tukwila Department of Community Development at (206) 431 -3683 or mdhaliwal(aci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions or would like additional information about these proposals. Comments may be submitted prior to March 15, 2004 via e -mail or addressed to the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Tukwila, WA 98188. Published: Seattle Times — 2/13/04 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC MEETING Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Monday, March 15, 2004 7:00 p.m. Eric Robb 6550 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 February 23, 2004 Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Dear Mr. Robb: Per the attached, the Tukwila City Council will hold a public meeting on March 15, 2004 to consider your request for changes in Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation for your properties. At this time, you and other members of the public are invited to speak on behalf of your proposal. After the public meeting, the City Council will decide whether or not to refer your request on to the Planning Commission for review, to reject the request or to modify it. I have conveyed this information via e-mail to Eric Labrie, but also wanted to forward you a copy of the information which was published in the Seattle Times on February 13, 2004. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 if you have questions. Sincerely, Enc. cc. Eric Labrie City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Rebecca Fox Tukwila Department of Community Development Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Community and Parks Committee February 10, 2004 Present: Pam Linder, Chair; Dave Fenton, Joe Duffle Steve Lancaster, Rebecca Fox, Jack Pace, Lucy Lauterbach 1. Annual Amendment to the Comp Plan Amendments to the Comp Plan are allowed only once a year unless there is an emergency. Staff is preparing changes to the Comp Plan, but because of their workload in other areas, they are doing minimal changes to comply with changed Growth Management Act (GMA) regulations, and three requests that have been submitted by members of the public. Anything beyond these issues will need to be proposed for the 2005 budget, as time does not allow more to be done this year. A proposed public participation schedule was reviewed, and the Committee thought it was very thorough. Expanding on the technical changes that will be proposed by staff, Steve went through the update issues briefly, and Rebecca's memo gave a little more detail. Those issues will be an expanded checklist that relies somewhat on the old comp plan EIS. Steve said some issues could be controversial though they won't be major issues. Our comp plan policies will all be reviewed, and then the GMA regulations will be reviewed to see which of our policies needs to be updated. Dave asked how we could make sure our mailing list reached everyone, and was told the most current list will be used, and anyone who shows an interest in the subject can be contacted. The Hazelnut will also be used to inform citizens about the process. Recommend resolution to COW. 2. Charles River Associates Contract Since fall of 2001 the City has contracted with Charles River in order to use the extensive knowledge and contracts of Dan Brand who works there. Mr. Brand is a pre - eminent expert in the field of parking, and has helped the City do a bit of planning for Sound Transit in this field. Now the work will intensify and his help will be more heavily relied on. Steve pointed out that the contract is not inexpensive, but that it is worth every penny. Sound Transit's original documents referenced Mr. Brand, so they can't say he's not creditable. Recommend contract to COW. 3. ECO Northwest contract Two associates from ECO NW have worked with the City as the plans for the TUC and TOD have begun. They are working with the economic and fiscal issues about the two areas. The next phase will take an in -depth look at markets for housing and development for the TUC /TOD areas. Whether it will pay to build specific housing and retail in certain areas will be looked at from a perspective of whether or not it makes sense. This company's work is paid through a grant. Pam raised the issue of this study having large implications, and said it needed to be compared to the Westfield Mall /Klickitat expansion, Tukwila Village, and the Segale developments. All will be vying for city funds, and priorities will need to be set. Pam said it's hard to compare the costs and benefits of all these projects. Recommend contract to COW. P c1 ' Committee chair approval Z,A`t C C Gi z w 6 JU 00 0 U) J l- U LL w 2 ¢ a w z = z� Lij U (0 o F- w W u. 0 w z U = 0 z 1 z u io s'as i dle; li syam fi :If ao!}ew o; 1:iGan!10 y eJeH Vett Wad �3iiodsdsiiynnµinnn ;leajls ewlo ;tiani!apo? e,eH )IJawlsad 88186 VM `2timxn,� •pnlg .ta3ua3tgnoS ZI?S9 qqo' 3i3g • 88186 VAN. tItnANns. •pnlg ioulaotROS OSS9 CICIo> 3I.Ia ��$ Z'e1e1S W110 WXOBOdJO V 7dy 9984S oy JUDS $ seed e6eisod (slot (peJ!nba}j luewesJopu3) aad Aen!!a0 pap!i!saij (pei!nbed luawasiopu3) ead ldepau wnied ea3 pep!ya3 e5alsod d!Z 'aie1S %G!0 '°N x0,9 od JO "ON 7d ti leans o1 7uOS saed s e6eisod laiol (pei!nbad luawasiopu3) ead tien!!a0 papplsay (pa,!nbad luewesJopu3) ead ldapa!j wmaa aad paywe a6eisod w LJ -.1 Ln 609Z1w- i0- S6SZOl S8J, 0 •0 0 eS!pueyoJa{n) Jo; ld!aoaa wnlad D pen ssaidx3 D oN D :mo!aq ssaJppe tian!Iap Jel � 'g3.& seA 0 Li. wel! woy luaJalj!p ssaippe A ie, s! •a + r kie !iea to also •0 eessaJppV- I lua6V D AN3/11730 NO NOI133S SIHI 3137dINO3 60SZ-W-1.0-S6S301. Q9'CE T+iE9 1,000 OTfi2 200L •0 0 as!pueyoie n! J04 ldlaoa8 wnlaa D Ileyj ssaidx3 D Nan!Iaa 40 ale(] • 0 aasseJppV -n lue6V D (eed wgx3) L J8AIje0 Paloulsaa •b I!elnl paJnsu! 0 pa1als!6aa D !1EIN Pall!lisO edit ao!AJ (aweN Paluud) dq pan!aoaa •8 eJnleu6!9 •V SLTE TfIE9 +3000 OTh2 200L seA D pad ai1x3) t'Jan!Iaa papulsaa • b pen painsul pajals!6a8 D I1eW Pau!IJeo 3 nww� 4 10QZ 90 8 • oN . ' :moleq ssaippe tian!IaPo4 •SPP seA p 6 luaialj!p ssaippe Aangap s! •0 `- 0 c, . • '' r =1 (aweN Pe7LJud) iq Pan!a3e •g einieuft ld!aoa)j wnlaa ogsawoa AH3/11730 NO NOLL33S SIH1 3137dWO3 ld!eoay wnlaa o!3sawoa a Id'] i� LOOZ;sn `1. L8£ WJJOd Sd (gage! °orw es wail JejsueiJ) JagwnN Glow •Z 88186 VPA t1?MO1n.L •pnig 1a1uaomnos Z11S9 ggo2I oug :ol passaippv alo!1JV • I. 'Ruled coeds;!;uog ay; uo Jo 'e3e!di! w egl ;o Noeq eq of PJeo sly; younv ■ no,( o; pep ayl wnleJ MO aM leyl OS 8SJOAW1 ay; uo sseippe pue aweu mo/C ;uud 1 •pansep s! /Janie° palou;saEI j, Wel! ela!dwoo only •£ pue `Z ' L swa ;! ela!dwo0 ■ NOLL33S SIH1 3137d14100 : 3QN3S LOU 3sn6nV ' Lee LWOd Sd Gage! °owes wo/j Jajsue-Jj) JagwnN slo!3JV - Z 88186 VPI `�IIM) fZ •pnig 1awOOLpnoS OSS9 ggog o!1g :ol pessaippy alo!>JV • L •sl!uued coeds;! ;uw; all uo Jo 'epelci !ew ay; ;o >peq ay; o; pied sill yoei • •not( of pied eq wnlei ueo enn ;ell os esJaneJ ay; uo sseippe pue eweu 1no/t;uud 1 •pansap s! tiangaa pa ;oulsaa j!.0 Wel! e eidwoo oslV •£ pue 'Z ' L swa ;! oleidwo° ■ NOI103S SIH1 3137th/110D :U30N3S NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. z To: Community Affairs -end Parks Committee ; i z From: Steve Lancaster (�� ce 2 Subject: Annual Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan J v Date: February 4, 2004 0 co 0 0 J 1-- Background: State law permits jurisdictions to amend their Comprehensive Plan documents no more than once each year, except in emergency situations. This year, Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan amendment process will include: 1) the GMA Technical Update (i.e. technical revisions required to comply with provisions of the Washington Growth Management Act) and; 2) Annual Amendments (i.e. changes proposed by members of the public as part of the City's regular process). GMA Technical Update items will include technical revisions to certain elements including housing, transportation, natural environment ; and several other issues. Annual amendments include requests for policy and map changes from private parties. We will consider the GMA Technical Update and Annual Amendments as part of the same process. They will be reviewed and adopted together before December 1, 2004, the deadline which the State has set for adopting GMA - related changes. This memo will describe the Annual Amendments as well as the process used to review and adopt them. It will also describe how the GMA Technical Update and Annual Amendment processes will be combined and coordinated. The accompanying draft memo (Attachment 1) provides a resolution adopting a public process and work plan for the 2004 Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including the GMA Technical Update and Annual Amendments. Annual Amendments: We received three applications for Comprehensive Plan amendments from private parties by the December 31, 2003 deadline. The applications are as follows: Robb Property – 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard - Proposal to change land use designation and zoning from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). This proposal was originally considered last year, but was denied with an option to reapply for reconsideration if vehicular access and encroachment issues were resolved by the 12/31/03 application deadline. The applicant has submitted some new information for City consideration during this year's review process, but it appears that the outstanding issues are not fully resolved. Sabey Corporation — Between 34 Avenue South and Tukwila International Boulevard, south of S. 126 -- Proposal to change land use designation and zoning from CAP memo re amdmts 2 -10 -04 mtngl z Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial / Light Industrial (C /LI). This is a new proposal relating to property that is part of the Department of Homeland Security property currently under construction at Intergate East. La Pianta LLC — Tukwila Valley South — Proposal to revise Comprehensive Plan Q policies relating to the Tukwila Valley South area. ;I w it Next Steps for Annual Amendments: 6 v The annual amendment process will proceed as per usual with a briefing before the City v o Council on February 23, 2004 to review the annual amendment proposals and decision w w process. The public will give its input on the potential amendments at a meeting to be J 1— held on March 1, 2004. Afterwards, the City Council will make a threshold decision on w 0 which proposed amendments to forward to the Planning Commission for further review. J IL Q Council Consideration for Annual Amendments: co a After holding a public meeting, the Council will evaluate the proposed amendment y = .. w according to the following review criteria: ? • Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? z o • If the issue is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a public need for the m proposed change? v a • Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? 0 - . oi- • Will the proposed change result in a new benefit to the community? w w Following its initial consideration of a proposed amendment, the Council shall make a "-- z "threshold decision" consisting of one of the following actions: in co • Refer the proposal as is to the Planning Commission for further review; 17. • Modify the proposal and refer the Planning Commission for further review; z • Defer consideration until a later time; • Reject the proposal. These "threshold" decisions are to be made following the public meeting scheduled for March 1, 2004. Coordination of Annual Amendments with GMA Technical Update: Distinct from the Annual Amendments proposed by private parties discussed above, staff has reviewed existing Comprehensive Plan policies and evaluated the need for revision based on the provisions of the Growth Management Act. As a result of the analysis, staff has prepared a proposed work plan and public process for the GMA Technical Update portion of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan amendments. On February 23, 2004, the same night that it is briefed on the Annual Amendments, the Council will be briefed on the proposed process and work plan for the GMA Technical Update portion of the Comprehensive Plan amendments. On March 1, 2004, the same date as the public meeting on the Annual Amendments, a public hearing will be held on the work plan and public process for the GMA Technical Update. RCW 36.70A.130 requires legislative action to adopt the work plan and public process for the GMA CAP memo re amdmts 2 -10 -04 mtng2 ; fi r Technical Update. Once the Council is satisfied with the GMA work plan and public process, it will pass a resolution to finalize these items. Next Steps: After the threshold decision is made for the Annual Amendments and the resolution adopting the GMA Technical Update work plan and public process is passed, all potential amendments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. Any proposed amendments that are referred by the Council to the Planning Commission will return before the Council for a final public hearing and a decision prior to the December 1, 2004 deadline set by the State of Washington. At that point, the Council may: • Adopt a proposed amendment; • Adopt a modified version of a proposed amendment; or • Reject the amendment. CAP memo re amdmts 2 -10 -04 mtng3 S.i »'.+'LG:iiJ::Su�N1tiF.'wYYG.. CAA: d1....:> n: :ciK'!rin«..sa.�;:s:;...:....w. sv.: t •.+-¢,... x..». w... v........,....�,..:..sw.n�....+ -- DRAFT -- To: Tukwila City Council From: Steve Lancaster Z ~w Subj: 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Growth Management Act n_ 2 (GMA) Technical Revisions & Annual Amendments) 6 D D Date: February 4, 2004 w z J H Background: CO 0 W are proceeding with the 2004 Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including 2 specific revisions related to the Growth Management Act and consideration of three g amendments submitted by private parties. All amendments should be adopted by N 2 December 1, 2004 to meet the State of Washington's deadline. w z '— Due to staffing, workload and scheduling issues we are focusing attention and resources z O on making technical revisions that are required to make Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan LU consistent with recent changes to the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA). We v 0 have combined the GMA Technical update with our annual amendment review. 0 co DI— Work plan and public participation: i v According to a schedule established by RCW 36.70.A.130(4), each city in Washington u_ 0 must take legislative action to review and, if needed, revise its Comprehensive Plan and iii Z co development regulations to ensure they comply with the GMA. Cities may use a variety 0 of public processes to fulfill this requirement. The level and amount of review and 0 �- revision that each city needs varies, depending on factors, such as when the most recent Z Plan and regulations were adopted. The attached resolution adopts a public involvement program and work plan for the 2004 GMA update as required by RCW 36.70A.130. The work plan was developed after staff review and analysis of existing Comprehensive Plan policies and changes to the Growth Management Act. It includes the annual amendments, and GMA required items, as well as issues that need improvement to be consistent with current State planning legislation. We would like your comments on the work plan and schedule, and will incorporate them into the final document. We anticipate holding a public hearing on the work plan on March 1, 2004. Resolution: Once the work plan elements have been agreed on, the resolution can be adopted. We anticipate that this will occur following the March 1, 2004 hearing. The resolution with work plan, public process and schedule will then be conveyed to the Washington Department of Commerce, Trade and Economic Development. PM�e .T — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ADOPTING A WORKPLAN AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS FOR UPDATING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PER RCW 36.70A.130 z WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (GMA) of 1990 established statewide goals, = z guidelines and procedural requirements to guide the development, coordination and e4 W 2 u� implementation of long range plans; and J v 0 0 O WHEREAS, the City, King County and other jurisdictions within the County adopted w = Countywide Planning Policies to provide a general framework for the implementation of N GMA in King County; and w 0 WHEREAS, the City, in order to implement the requirements and goals of GMA and the g Countywide Planning Policies adopted a Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning a Code in 1995 ; and f= _ z � WHEREAS, the 1995 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Code were adopted z 0 with appropriate public notice, involvement and environmental review; and LLI Li] WHEREAS, the Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.80 establishes a public process for 0 u) amending the Comprehensive Plan; and 0 I— wW U WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Zoning Code and associated 0 development regulations have been regularly amended since adoption with public notice, ui z involvement and environmental review; and c. 1 I- 0 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires Tukwila by December 1, 2004 to review, and, if needed, revise the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations to ensure they comply with the requirements of the Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Zoning Code and other development regulations have been reviewed and analyzed to determined needed revisions based on GMA compliance per RCW 36.70A.130; and WHEREAS, a public participation program has been developed to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the review and suggest needed revisions of the plan and regulations; and WHEREAS, a work program has been prepared to complete the needed revisions; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: . • :[S!a4fblJi'•tiF'.bWn:ti.+�ti?i ;4�§^.wr'.C' -'—. —_ Resolution-- 1 -14 -04 z The Public Participation program for the 2004 City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Update in Attachment A, and the Work Program in Attachment B to this Resolution are hereby approved as the basis for developing the amendments for the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. U:::..:5 h '.i A'++.. ,,...n.,,,..ak.wa:s•...vxx:LJe; �t.Wwir::Ys%iSt'7ili `�ri.::Fr +u:: 6«Iu r,:i .s+«u:::i yr.:+t.:n.hlnia:�w:»o,L w ..ie�:ciir.a:�r:,n�iA'1r, .... �f:.'tk. Resolution-- 1 -14 -04 z z. W : 0 0 (o w ' , W =, O : 2 J LL. < I CI F— W Z F— 1— O Z U of O -' :LL1 W 1 LL. F'" O: W 0 O Z 02/10/04 1 Attachment B -- Draft -- WORK PROGRAM 2004 UPDATE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ? w re 6 JU The City is required to take action to review and, if needed, revise the City's c� 0 Comprehensive Plan and development regulations to ensure compliance with the w requirements of the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A. 130 (1). To accomplish - this, staff reviewed all Comprehensive Plan policies, comparing them with GMA w 0 requirements as well as changes since the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2 1995. Staff further reviewed comments from Washington Department of Community g Trade and Economic Development dating from initial Comprehensive Plan adoption in c a 1995 to make sure that all issues had been resolved. = w _ Z I- As a result of this review, staff has identified the following revisions that are needed. z O These, combined with three proposed amendments submitted by members of the public, w w comprise the majority of the Comprehensive Plan work program as follows: v o 0 — State Requirements for the 5 -year Plan and Development Regulations Update o I. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 0 u-- o . Discussion: The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires individual jurisdictions' w Z plans to be consistent with Countywide Planning Policies, including household and employment targets aimed at reaching appropriate densities in Urban Growth Areas 0 F' (UGAs). Population and employment targets were adopted by King County and included Z in Tukwila's 1995 Comprehensive Plan. King County Countywide Planning Policies, adopted May, 2003, set updated growth targets for Tukwila and other cities within the County. Conclusion: Information contained in the Economic Development Element and Background Report will be revised to incorporate current population and employment targets specified in the Countywide Planning Policies. II. HOUSING ELEMENT Discussion: Staff has considered whether the Housing Element addresses the following as required by GMA, including: 1) Targets or objectives for providing affordable housing suited to income levels of people who live or work in Tukwila; 2) Strategy and mechanisms for achieving targets; 3) Group homes, foster care, accessory dwelling units and manufactured housing; 4) Housing inventory and analysis for future needs; 5) Support and provide for efficient use of land and housing opportunities Countywide Planning Policies. Tukwila has among the most affordable housing in the region. Strategies and policies are in place to continue providing Tukwila's fair share of future regional low- and moderate - income housing. Some strategies include: • Smaller lots in single- family zones • Accessory dwelling units allowed on lots at least 7,200 square feet • Increased density allowable through Planned Residential Development ? Z w � • Use of Community Development Block Grant funds to support low- income home 2 repair programs v U O As explained above, the Growth Management Act (GMA) requires individual W jurisdictions' plans to be consistent with Countywide Planning Policies, including • 1- updated household and employment targets adopted in 2003. Tukwila's population w 0 targets are derived from an allocation by the County based on population projections for the state Office of Financial Management. Current targets are more realistic than earlier • Q targets, and reflect a reduction from 6,000 new living units to 3,200. These can be single cn family houses, apartment or condo units. As required by GMA, Tukwila will need to = w update the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element and Background Report to include z King County's most recent household targets. We will also prepare an updated housing z o analysis and inventory to guide future policy. w • w o . Conclusion: Updated household targets, housing inventory and analysis for future o S2 needs will be completed as part of GMA Technical Update. ° I-- w • U II. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT o z Discussion: v Comprehensive Plan Natural Environment element Policies 4.1.4 through 4.3.4 pertain z t— to environmentally - sensitive areas. TMC Chapter 18.45 (Zoning Code Sensitive Areas ordinance) guides development near environmentally sensitive areas such as steep slopes, wetlands and watercourses. Per RCW 36.70A.172 and .030(5), the City is required to: 1) review the critical (sensitive) areas ordinances to see if they incorporate the best available science and special consideration for anadromous fisheries; 2) identify sources of best available science used to develop the critical areas regulations; and 3) have policies that give guidance to its critical areas regulations, based on best available science. 02/10/042 Tukwila is in the process of reviewing its Comprehensive Plan policies and Development Codes relating to Sensitive Areas to incorporate "best available science" and consideration of anadromous fish. Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC Chapter 18.44) will be updated to incorporate the best available science and special consideration for anadromous fisheries as required in RCW 36.70A.172. The Natural Environment Element of the Comprehensive Plan will be evaluated and updated as necessary, based on = best available science to guide policies and regulations for environmentally sensitive areas, including wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically v hazardous areas, and frequently flooded areas o 0 u�w Conclusion: Tukwila is required to complete this information. Update of Natural Environment Element and, Sensitive Areas Ordinance in progress. N w0 2 III. TUKWILA URBAN CENTER ELEMENT Discussion: The Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Sub -area Plan, now being prepared, is = considered part of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan. TUC Plan work will set policy z direction and contain redevelopment specifics for the Tukwila Urban Center. I-. 0 z w Sub -area plans may not be inconsistent with the adopted Comprehensive 0 Plan. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(i), amended in 2002, allows a plan amendment more 0 u) frequently than once a year for "[T]he initial adoption of a sub -area plan that does not 0 modify the comprehensive plan policies and designations applicable to the sub - area." = 0 A sub -area plan that does not change Comprehensive Plan policies can be adopted at any „ o time, however a sub -area plan such as the TUC plan which proposes a change in policy w z may only be considered once a year, together with other proposed comprehensive plan c� amendments. 01-- Policy wording will be ready prior to development guidelines. The entire TUC Plan will not be ready for review and adoption until late 2004 or early 2005, after the December 1, 2004 deadline for amending the Comprehensive Plan has passed. Since the TUC Plan will contain policy changes and will not be completed until later in 2004, it would be necessary to delay Plan adoption by nearly a year, until the 2005 annual amendment process. To avoid this delay and in order to make the most efficient use of staff time, TUC - related policy changes will be considered separate from the rest of the Plan, and included in the 2004 annual Comprehensive Plan update. Once TUC - related policy changes are adopted, the entire TUC Sub -area Plan can be considered and adopted when it is completed in later 2004 or early 2005, rather than waiting nearly an additional year. Conclusion: The City will revise Tukwila Urban Center policies per guidance of TUC Sub -area Plan work and Background Report update (in progress) III. UTILITIES ELEMENT Discussion: Staff prepared a new Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan which proposes new or revised policies to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan per 02/10/043 z revisions to the Growth Management Act. In addition, significant changes have occurred in other City utilities, including telecommunications and solid waste management. Conclusion: Staff will update data and revise policies requiring changes due to preparation and anticipated adoption of the Surface Water Management Plan, as well as any background information which is significantly out of date. IV. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • Discussion: Staff review showed that the City has done the following as required by GMA: 1) worked with the regional planning organization to designate the levels of service on highways that are not of statewide significance; 2) incorporated the levels of service set by WSDOT for highways of statewide significance and eliminated these highways from the City's concurrency management system; 3) included an inventory of state transportation facilities in the City's jurisdictional area. In addition, Tukwila uses a variety of transportation strategies such as: Commute Trip Reduction (CTR), Transportation Management Plans (TMP), multi -modal facilities (trails, bus stops, commuter rail). Tukwila has designated LOS for local arterials. It has not as yet designated LOS for Regionally Significant State Highways (non -HSS) as recently required by the Puget Sound Regional Council, and needs to complete traffic estimates to several state -owned facilities, primarily Interstate -5. Conclusion: Most of the GMA requirements are met. However, Tukwila needs to amend the Transportation Element to address the following: • LOS standards for non -HSS, and certain state -owned facilities; • Update planning horizon Include any new or changed policies which result from updates to the Transportation Plan or Concurrency Ordinance. V. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Discussion: Staff review of comments made from Washington CTED from the 1995 Comprehensive Plan adoption showed that information on the projected needs, current capacities and funding sources is scattered through various documents and sources. Conclusion: We recommend updating and consolidating capital facilities information to show assets and funding sources more clearly. IV. MAINTENANCE OF THE PLAN ELEMENT Discussion: The City is required to monitor the Comprehensive Plan, including: 1) a method for monitoring how well Comprehensive Plan policies and associated development regulations are achieving the goals of the Plan and of the GMA; 2) a process for amending the Comprehensive Plan; and 3) a definition of "emergency" for the purpose of amending the plan or development regulations outside of the yearly amendment process. Amendments must also be coordinated with King County and other cities. 02/10/044 SreM t- z i z J D U 0 w = w • 0 L Q = • a w z � F- z r D • D O - 0 I- ww rz .. z w U = 5 '- z Tukwila monitors the effectiveness of its Comprehensive Plan , development regulations and other implementation techniques by addressing needed changes, performing analysis (such as the regular "Buildable Lands" analysis) and completing annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. In addition, the City conducts periodic updates to related functional plans. The City sends a copy of proposed amendments to Z¢ Washington Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development, other state = z 6 and regional agencies. n J U. Conclusion: The plan monitoring requirements have been met, except for the U 0 " emergency amendment." Tukwila needs to specify a definition and process for w w "Emergency Amendments" to the Comprehensive Plan by revising the Maintenance -J of the Plan Element and the Zoning Code. uj p w 2 VI. Background Information: g 5 When the draft Comprehensive Plan was reviewed by State staff prior to its 1995 adoption, the reviewer indicated that the Comprehensive Plan map should include a I a "public lands" designation to identify lands useful for public purposes, such as utility z corridors, transportation corridors, landfills, recreation, schools and other public uses. z o Conclusion: We will update a Comprehensive Plan map to include existing information to p indicate a "public lands" designation per comments by Washington CTED. w 1— 1-- -- LL' O .z In addition to the preceding GMA- related issues, the City will consider applications v for Comprehensive Plan policy and/or map changes which were received from private p H parties who submitted requests for annual amendments prior to the December 31, Z 2003 deadline. VII. Annual Amendments VIII. Target Schedule January, 2004 • Staff prepares annual amendments & GMA public involvement , work program with resolution February, 2004 • Brief CAP and COW re annual amendments, GMA revision process & scope • Transmit scope of work/public process resolution to COW • Brief Planning Commission re GMA process, annual amendments March, 2004 • Public meeting re annual amendments; • City Council threshold decision re annual amendments • Public hearing on work plan/public process • Adopt Resolution on work plan/public process • Background information, policy drafts due from staff; Revise 02/10/045 • Begin State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review for 2004 Comprehensive Plan April, 2004 • Issue SEPA • Planning Commission Briefing May, 2004 • Planning Commission briefings • Public open house • Planning Commission hearing June, 2004 • Planning Commission Deliberation July, 2004 • Planning Commission prepares recommendations w/ ordinances; • Submit recommendations to CTED to meet "60 day" requirement August, 2004 • City Council briefings September, 2004 • Public open house • City Council Hearings October, 2004 • City Council Deliberation November, 2004 • City Council adopts ordinances • Ordinances forwarded to CTED .:f:; see:: r :.,c�.�.•.�:`�ur.,;� +r,,:.:. . �,z.+ u..rxv.�.t�,a ta:.� ' «.:'.w::ti'.:. il + , S'�iL•�:tx::i Quantity . _ Date Description 2 Each 2 -6 -04 Sets of mailing labels for property owners and residents within 500 feet of the Subject Property 1 Each 2 -6 -04 500 Feet Radius Map 0 City of Tukwila, Department of Community TO: Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Rebecca Fox RE: Mailing Labels Robb Rezone - 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd. For your use as requested. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL cc: Eric Robb Eric G. LaBrie, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE: February 6, 2004 SENT VIA: Courier Delivery OUR JOB: 10751, Signed: 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com _ ! % h Harley M / on Project Planner Q 10751 t.006af.340.doc Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® 0359700 -0320 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 059700 -0500 City of Tukwila 15460 — 65th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98188 000320 -0004 Housing Authority of King County 15455 — 65th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98188 000320 -0017 State of Washington 000320 -0022 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 359700 -0321 Julia N. Shozen 15415 - 65th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98188 000320 -0010 Gerald E. Schneider 7517 Greenwood Avenue North Seattle, WA 98103 000320 -0015 Kevin G. Klotz 6532 South 154th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 000320 -0014 Schneider Homes, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 359700 -0520 Michael D. Alhadeff 6305 Beach Dr. S.W. Seattle, WA 98136 0359700 -0023 Cook Wade Seminars, Inc. 14675 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 000320 -0011 Royald Coachman Associates LLC P.O. Box 140 Kent, WA 98035 000320 -0018 William E. Robb, Trust P.O. Box 88510 Tukwila, WA 98138 000320 -0019 William E. Robb P.O. Box 88510 Tukwila, WA 98138 .:, 11.. Mi1 54✓we4;%wkfiti+laiW ^ +b;Y4016imari5FmiC'E6 0,-)A4'[?7iYi+ .mg.3X:fii Aa iF.d3z4a t»`, 24:. iii 4. 47" ""•• °•••• " "u.CJIGtTLM.a7LE�CA'! Map Output f , Agricultural Production District Boundary CJ King County theBufferPoygons theBufferTarget County Boundary Streets Forest Production District Boundary Urban Growth Area Line Lakes and Large Rivers Muckleshool Tribe Parcel Incorporated Area Zoning Labels Zoning A.10 • Apattrd, me OU per 10 aac Home i News Services A )7°°03 14 359 000 35.7 CJ., ♦/ * 1 3597000340 29' 1900 sou1N�E T.U.KWILA_P_KWY 3=153R0 :ST UNNAMED 5190042 954 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma Legend A.35 - Arai trd , me DU per 35 a m F. Fermi Al • A1irxrd RA•2.5 • Ru haa, me OU pm- 5 °aces RA•5 • Ru-d Arco, arc DU p- 5 =as RA• 10 • Arco, unc DU pc- 10 ales UR • Urtral Rcayc, me DU pc- 5 ar R -1 • Rmdsnd. me DU po• aa•c R.4. Read -rid, 4 DU ps an-c R • 6 • Rmdand • 6 DU p- asc R.8. Rmd -nd, 8 OU ps arc R- 12•Rmdana,12DUpsa -c R. 18 • Rmdc-na, 18 DU pc arc R -24 - Rmd=»d, 24 DU p- 0: R 48 • Rmacicrit.I. 46 DUpsa -c NS) • Nag-ti3rrnd arlrr-ss CQ • Cann uIt ©-r�rms Comments RB • Ro3o'. Ei;asm_s 0. 01Scc 1. Marry CTs Search 2423049092 15 4 69ftr 0005800002 The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. http: / /www5. metrokc. gov/ servlet /com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName= overview &ClientVersion= 4.0... 2/6/2004 King County I GIS Center 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search X)75/ Page 1 of 2 d s oeN SPA w'N ?Jin?t'w. °]'A.ItY!;!t?cfrvrl 2004 Public Participation Program Comprehensive Plan /Development Code Update z ce w 6 PURPOSE: Involve citizens, businesses and other potentially interested parties in the 0 o preparation and adoption of the 2003 -2004 update to the Comprehensive w Plan/Development Code -J F- ASSUMPTIONS: w • Primary goals and objectives will be maintained from current Plan. • Update will focus on elements that require updating per changes to the Washington N Growth Management Act. _ c21 w • The secondary focus will be on any additional changes proposed by the public, z including map changes and improvements /clarifications of existing Comprehensive z o Plan and Zoning Code, as part of the annual Comprehensive Plan amendment process. ❑ U O D- ROLES AND RESPONSBILITIES: ❑ w City Council: = The City Council will provide policy guidance and is the final decision maker for the o Comprehensive Plan update. The Council will receive periodic briefings on the update, w z review the Planning Commission recommendation, and adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The public meeting, open house and hearing will provide public 0 (- involvement opportunities. The public will be notified of events through direct mailings and legal notices. The City Council's target schedule is: • September, 2003 — Briefing (Tukwila Profile, Update Process, Scope and Schedule) • March, 2004 — Public meeting re annual amendments, hearing re GMA workplan • August, 2004 — Briefings - -The City Council will review background materials and proposed amendments. • September, 2004 — Public open house, Public hearings. The City Council will hear and consider public comments. • October, 2004 — Deliberations Planning Commission: The Planning Commission will provide policy recommendations for the update and ensure that the public is involved throughout the process through an open house and hearings. The public will be notified of events through direct mailings and legal notices. The Planning Commission's target schedule is: • September, 2003 -- Briefing (Tukwila Profile, Update Process, Scope and Schedule) • April, 2004 — Briefings re background information and proposed revisions (3) \ \TUK2 \VOL3 \ HOME \REBECCA \Comp plan 2004 \Public Involvement Program -- Council 1- 29- 04.doc Attachment A 1 • May, 2004 – Public open house on background information and proposed revisions May 2004 — Public hearing • June, 2004 — Deliberations • July, 2004 — Recommendation -- The Planning Commission will consider public comments and make a recommendation to the City Council. ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: In addition to the public open houses, hearings and meetings associated with the Planning Commission and City Council (above), the following are designed to bring the public into the process and solicit their input on Update issues /priorities: • Review results from Vision Tukwila meetings and survey (March/April, 2003) • Consider comments from Tukwila Urban Center workshops (primarily focused on housing issues and transportation element update) (2003 -2004) • Address interested groups as requested (i.e. Southwest King County Chamber of Commerce, November, 2003) • SEPA checklist(s) comment period. Separate environmental review for Sensitive Areas update and other amendments (March/April, 2004) • Prepare regular "Hazelnut" articles focused on the Update (January- December, 2004) • Establish City web page presence and email address for Update (February- December, 2004) • Develop Comprehensive Plan Update mailing list including citizens, business owners, other interested parties • Distribute Comprehensive Plan Update materials (as available) at City events, (i.e. Tukwila Days, Special Recycling Day, TUC workshops) locations (i.e. Tukwila Community Center). • Prepare press releases as appropriate \ \TUK2 \VOL3 \HOME \REBECCA \Comp plan 2004 \Public Involvement Program -- Council 1- 29- 04.doc 2 ..:a; - yr:. ;: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Eric Robb 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 January 26, 2004 Dear Mr. Robb: We have received your re- application for a Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Change from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington. This letter addresses both state - mandated completeness issues, and substantive topics. Completeness: The application packet does not include two copies of labels to all property owners and tenants within 500' of the properties. Please provide these required materials by Wednesday February 4, 2004. Substantive Comments: • Background: On September 2, 2003, the City Council rejected your request for a Comprehensive Plan and zoning change from LDR to C /LI, stating that you could reapply without charge for consideration if access and encroachment issues were resolved before December 31, 2003. In late October, you submitted a document from Gerald Schneider pertaining to access easements. This document was returned to you via a letter (copy enclosed) from Rebecca Fox, dated October 28, 2003. Rebecca's letter repeated the City Council's decision that all access and encroachment issues needed to be resolved prior to the December 31, 2003 application deadline. The latest application, received December 31, 2003, included the same access easement document from Gerald Schneider. No further information on this topic was provided. The new Comprehensive Plan application also made no mention of the encroachment issues. In a conversation with consultants from Barghausen Engineering, staff learned that you plan to apply for a Boundary Line Adjustment after purchasing property from your neighbor. At this point, the access and encroachment issues have not been resolved; documentation has not been provided. The City Council's requirements for reapplying have not been met. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor • Required information: Please provide the following information by February 4, 2004 to enable us to continue • processing your application. This information will demonstrate that you have resolved the access and encroachment issues that the City Council required as a condition of your resubmitting the application: Access- - 1. Identify the specific parcel(s) from which Gerald Schneider is granting access to Eric Robb 2. Identify the public right of way onto which Eric Robb will be gaining access 3. Indicate that the access granted by Gerald Schneider will be paved and that it will comply with City requirements 4. Show with some specificity the location of the future paved access 5. Indicate that future development of both the Schneider and Robb properties will be coordinated between Mr. Schneider and Mr. Robb to take into account the access granted to Mr. Robb 6. The access agreement should be recorded against both properties with the King County Assessor to ensure that it is considered when either property is developed Encroachment: 1. Property onto which Mr. Robb's building and retaining wall currently encroach shall be purchased from Mr. Alhadeff 2. Boundary line adjustment shall be applied for and approved by DCD 3. New boundaries shall be recorded with the King County Assessor Please provide all the required information by February 4, 2004. If you do not provide all the required information by February 4, 2004, your application will be considered incomplete. In this case, staff will recommend that your application be deferred until the 2004 -2005 review cycle. On February 23, 2004, the City Council will hold a public meeting on all the proposed amendments at 7 p.m. in the Tukwila City Council Chambers at 6200 Southcenter Boulevard at 7 p.m. The purpose of the public meeting is to give the City Council members the information which will allow them to make a decision on whether or not they feel proposed amendments, including yours, should be forwarded to the Planning Commission for further study or whether they should be dropped without further consideration. At the public meeting, you may comment briefly on your proposal, if you wish. Once your application is determined to be complete, you will need to install the notice board on the site per information included with your application packet. If you need another set of instructions, please call me. Please stop by our office tp pick up a laminated Notice of Public Meeting. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting from your application to our office. i%�i_ Pay_:; �re�ta�:; c :isr3:t�;:`C�nSxy;aa"i� ",�:.. `•a.- :�i�f:�::�3T� -. Please contact me at 206- 431 -3683 if you have questions. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. cc. Eric Labrie Harley Mattson Bob Giberson W I 6 J U; UO W U U w : W I J F_ . U) LL, w O . g . • ? a Z I- 0 Z i-- w U zz.: O H. W . F U u" O w Z U = O H z m r-1 c-9 m r1 m -n D D D r1 ru ru D I=1 Retum Reciept Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Apt or PO Box City, State, Postage Certified Fee Certified Fee Retum Reciept Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Apt or PO Box 1 City, State, aNawnooa 3H1 AO mnvno 3H1 °Jana SI 11 30110N SIH1 NVH1?:1V310 SS31 SI StAIVIA SIRL NI iNawnooa 3H1 AI :30110N $ 2 -tgLida Harley Mattson Barghausen Consulting 18215 72 Ave. So. Kent, WA 98032 PS Form 3811, August 2001 6zie4 5 Postage Eric Labrie Barghausen Consulting 18215 72 Ave. So. Kent, WA 98032 Postmark Here Postmark Here • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 1. Article Addressed to: Harley Mattson Barghausen Consulting 18215 72 Ave. So. Kent, WA 98032 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION NI Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we.can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permip& 1. Article Addressed to: /I: Eric Labrie ' Barghausen ConsultiBem 18215 72 Ave. So. EL - 01 '444 Kent, WA 98032 2. Article Number 7002 2410 0004 6341 3144 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, August 2001 I 1 • ••• • ,— .1i C( D EVELUp I d. Service Type _ Mail 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail 7002 2410 0004 6341 3151 Domestic Return Receipt A. Signature X SCNDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item U Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 v c�.( ( f . 102595-01-M-2509 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Agent Addressee ery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Service Type , Certified Mail *0 Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) Domestic Return Receipt 102595-01-M-2509 REC;P'' DEC 31 AIM 3--Z et 2 u DEVELOPMENT U O • o U) - 1- N Li. W 0 g = a I -W z = I— 0 • On behalf of our client, Mr. Eric Robb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., is formally submitting the w I— enclosed application for a Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment for the property located at the ? o above - referenced addresses. The existing zoning designation is Low Density Residential (LDR) and the c� Comprehensive Plan land use map designation is Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant wishes o to request a rezone to Office (0) and a Comprehensive Plan map amendment to Office (0). w w u'O •• z W U= O ~ Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Dear Ms. Fox: Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code Amendment Application 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washington King County Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Our Job No. 10751 This request was previously submitted for the 2003 cycle, but was denied because of site - specific issues that needed to be resolved. In the past few months, Mr. Robb has reached an agreement with both adjoining landowners regarding the outstanding access and encroachment issues. We are enclosing a letter from Mr. Gerald Schneider agreeing to provide access through his property for your information. The encroachment issue has been resolved and Mr. Robb has an earnest money agreement to purchase the necessary property to resolve this issue through the processing of a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA). The BLA will be submitted in the near future. In support of this request, the following items are enclosed: CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES December 31, 2003 COURIER DELIVERY 1. One signed original Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment application form and eight copies 2. One copy of the Application Checklist, indicating items submitted with the application — ►Jet o_,r,cloec' pte,r y Vtor d(5w66101J 5 Lanca5fer- 4. King County Assessor's Map showing the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject site 5. Vicinity map with site locations 6. Eight copies of surrounding land use map for all existing land uses within a 1,000 -foot radius of the subject site property line 7. Title report 8. Eight copies of written discussion of project consistency with each review criteria 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com z Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -2- December 31, 2003 9. Eight sets of landscape plans, boundary and topographic exhibit, and site plan 10. One set of high quality photo reductions of all plans 11. One copy of letter from Mr. Gerald Schneider, signed September 29, 2003 Also enclosed with the applications for the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map Amendment is the required application for SEPA Environmental Review. The following items are enclosed in support of the application for SEPA Environmental Review: 1. One signed original SEPA Environmental Review application and six copies 2. Application Checklist 3. Six copies of SEPA Environmental Checklist 4. King County Assessor's Map showing location of each property within 500 feet of the subject site 5. Vicinity map with site location 6. Six copies of surrounding land use map for all existing land uses within a 1,000 -foot radius of the property lines 7. Title report The existing site contains two separate, single - family residences and a 40 -foot access and utilities easement. No project- specific development activity is proposed at this time. No changes in use or proposed development activities are being requested with this application. Please note that the enclosed landscaping plan has not been prepared by a licensed professional landscape architect, because there is no development activity proposed at this time. There will not be any removal of vegetation onsite, as the current uses will remain. The existing, on -site vegetation will also remain undisturbed, including all residential landscaping and trees. A boundary and partial topographic survey is enclosed with the application materials. The survey map shows property lines, right -of -way widths and contours and spot elevations of the existing driveway. The site boundary is shown with bearings and distances and a legal description has been provided to clearly define the areas to be rezoned to the Office land use designation. Because the applicant does not have any plans for project - specific development at this time, a complete boundary and topographic survey has not been provided. The applicant has entered into an access agreement with the adjacent property owner to provide safe ingress and egress to both the applicant's property and the adjacent property. Please see the enclosed letter from Mr. Gerald Schneider for more information. Additionally, the applicant plans to submit a Boundary Line Adjustment application in mid to late January of 2004. As shown on the enclosed boundary and topographic survey, the existing building on Tax Lot 19 encroaches upon the neighboring property to the north. The Boundary Line Adjustment will resolve this encroachment. .ti`. • .. - ..,,.:.: .:e.i 01 44,14 :. Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -3- Should you wish to discuss this application in further detail, have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me immediately. In order to process this application this year, we will respond to all requests for additional information with urgency to keep this project moving through the review process. Thank you for your attention to this application and I look forward to speaking with you in the near future. pectfully, arley Mattson Project Planner HIM /dm/mm 10751c.010.doc enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Eric Robb (w /enc) Mr. Eric G. LaBrie, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. December 31, 2003 Parcel Number Owner Name 537920 0113 537920 0116 537920 0121 537920 0135 537920 0136 537920 0138 537920 0139 537920 0140 537920 0141 537920 0143 537920 0144 537920 0145 537920 0147 537920 0148 537920 0150 537920 0151 537920 0151 537920 0154 537920 0156 537920 0162 537920 0163 537920 0164 537920 0165 537920 0166 537920 0184 537920 0185 537920 0186 537920 0187 537920 0189 779640 0050 779640 0060 779640 0070 779640 0080 779640 0090 779640 0100 779640 0110 779640 0120 779640 0130 779640 0140 779640 0150 779640 0160 779640 0170 812520 0020 812520 0021 812520 0025 812520 0030 812520 0032 812520 0034 812520 0280 812520 0290 812520 0290 812520 0300 812520 0481 812520 0483 885880 0005 885880 0010 Price Sharon Fernandez Ceferino A/Lydia Q Amon Manan John/Humayra Stright Herbert H Puget Sound Energy & Elec Ellison Raymond 0/Lillian E Fincher -boyd Winnie R Ohlstrom Mark A & Catherine Bell David C Chin Gilbert W Alari Quinton J/Becky J Alari Quinton JBecky J Kempf G Pasquan Corinne M Hanley W J & Marten K Bauch Ed Heppenstall Mildred R MetroScan / King (WA) Site Address Pack Frederick J II Powers Richard D Morgan David A & Nadine L Elko Curtis J;Heyer Nancy M Bowie Charles D /Josephine M Hackl Marian/E John Gedlu Habtelul;Aberahm Muna Murphy Sean R Fry David R/Jamie C Phan Han H Ae Development Llc Lindback Robert A /Lyle L Co Truste Ae Development Llc Lindback Christopher P Topinka Charles A Donlin T & D Trust Donlin T & D Trust Donlin D Pt Nguyen Trung Thanh;Luu Long Rodriguez Rudy Jr Gov Tea H & Eng You Ir Joseph Marty L Sipe Dana S Weems Charles J & Beatrice C Mah John J & Helen T Morgan David & Nadine Tillery Brenda C Ojurovich Joseph Diggs Ronald D Rooker John C 11 James F & Jody P Venable Park Sang W /Sandra A M Lim Winifred W & Fannie Anderson John L;Canada Signa M Jones Paul L;Preite Gina M Desimone Steven MBobbie Lynn Northrop -arthur Trust Barghausen Thomas A Barghausen Thomas A & Lee Saundr 16440 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 16432 53rd Pl S Tukwila 98188 16428 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 16424 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 5157 S 168th St Seattle 98188 *no Site Address* Tukwila 16807 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 16813 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 16819 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 5155 S 168th St Tukwila 98188 16804 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 16816 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 16816 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 16828 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 16825 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 5162 S 170th St Seattle 98188 16603 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 16615 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 .«_.;!�!- ce- «m�.+�.7j5eeR�n^Yr rye? iin, M�°..'.,` �«'. �. P4! F�1�,.: 9..:: 7{` s�cis�rci4...,. w7�' y.' u. •�`i'+"'�,a4wr..- ;n�!c�?;•C'n�� .FR�'n :Pl= y't;Y' *no Site Address* Tukwila .04 49 16442 51st Ave S Seattle 98188 i* 44/ t- 1978 16446 51st Ave S Tukwila 98188 41 1" 1941 206 - 243 -0900 16460 51st Ave 5 Seatac 98188 1947 5145 S 166th St Seatac 98188 1994 206 - 246 -1924 5155 S 166th St Seatac 98188 1998 5165 S 166th St Seatac 98188 1998 5125 S 166th Ln Seatac 98188 2001 5131 S 166th Ln Seatac 98188 5130 S 166th Ln Seatac 98188 *no Site Address* Seatac 16620 51st Ave S Seatac 98188 *no Site Address* Seatac 5119 S 166th Ln Seatac 98188 *no Site Address* Seatac 16640 51st Ave S Seatac 98188 16640 51st Ave S Seatac 98188 5156 S 168th St Seattle 98188 16714 51st Ave S Seatac 98188 5140 S 168th St Seatac 98188 5128 S 168th St Seatac 98188 5160 S 168th St ( No Mail) Seatac 98188 5134 S 168th St Seatac 98188 5150 S 168th St Seatac 98188 5310 S 166th St Seattle 98188 5190 S 166th St Seattle 98188 16461 54th Ave S Seatac 98188 5166 S 166th St Seattle 98188 16449 54th Ave S Tukwila 98188 16441 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 16445 53rd P1 S Seattle 98188 16449 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 16453 53rd Pl S Seattle 98188 16455 53rd Pl S Tukwila 98188 16452 53rd PI S Tukwila 98188 16448 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 16444 53rd P1 S Tukwila 98188 *no Site Address* Tukwila Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. tl! 1946 2000 1989 1989 1989 1989 1957 Owner Phone 425- 482 -6116 1950 1952 1983 1986 1953 1951 1978 1952 1955 206 - 246 -9553 1979 1978 206 - 243 -0900 1965 1943 1938 206 - 244 -6356 1988 1989 1988 1989 1989 206- 433 -7723 1989 1988 1988 1993 206- 242 -7013 1948 1983 1983 1966 1956 1955 1955 206 -244 -9809 1963 206- 244 -6731 1963 1958 1958 Parcel Number Owner Name MetroScan /King (WA) Site Address 885880 0015 Farrell Dorothy E 16625 53rd Ave S (No Mail) Seattle 981881961 206 - 243 -9753 885880 0020 Kerr F Murdena 16629 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 1959 885880 0025 Moikobu Sophia M 16635 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 1959 885880 0030 Akre Forrest J 16645 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 1978 885880 0035 Fry Victoria W 16655 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 1959 885880 0040 Gorjance William J 16604 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 1958 885880 0045 Olson Donald Ray 16612 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 1960 281- 324 -3065 885880 0060 Hayes Dwayne F 16634 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 1959 885880 0065 Voiland Steven T /Lydia A D 16642 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 1957 885880 0070 Fritz Betty Lou 16650 53rd Ave S Seattle 98188 1957 206 - 243 -2749 885880 0075 Chin Gilbert 16660 53rd Ave S Tukwila 98188 1963 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Sohttions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. YB Owner Phone City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Eric Robb 6550 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 October 28, 2003 RE: Comprehensive Plan/Rezone Request at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Dear Mr Robb: I am returning the enclosed letter from Gerald Schneider regarding his agreement with you in developing reciprocal access easements. In rejecting your request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone earlier this year, the Tukwila City Council stated that you will need to submit a new application before your request for a rezone and Comprehensive Plan Map change can be reconsidered. Access easements and property line encroachment issues must be fully resolved prior to your submitting the application. Along with the new application, you will need to provide complete documentation showing how these issues have been resolved. For your convenience, I have included an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone. Please note that this application must be returned to the City of Tukwila no later than December 31, 2003 in order for the request to be considered in 2004. As we discussed, there will be no charge for the new application. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 if you have any questions. Sincerely, A kC-C-eL_ 17 x Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. Cc Eric Labrie Brian Shelton Jack Pace Kathy Stetson Attachment C Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 - 3665 CALL TO ORDER /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: OFFICIALS: 2. Human Services Advisory Board TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers — City Hall September 2, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Mayor Steve Mullet called the Regular Meeting to order at 7 :01 p.m. and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Jane Cantu, City Clerk, called the roll of Council. Present were Councilmembers Joe Duffle, Joan Hernandez, Jim Haggerton, Pamela Linder, Dave Fenton and Richard Simpson. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO EXCUSE THE ABSENCE OF COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAM CARTER. The motion carried 6 -0. Steve King, City Attorney; Lucy Lauterbach, Council Analyst; Jane Cantu, City Clerk; Jim Morrow, Public Works Director; Steve Lancaster, Community Development Director; and Bruce Fletcher, Parks and Recreation Director. PROCLAMATIONS /APPOINTMENTS Appointments to Boards and Commissions 1. Community Oriented Policing Citizens' Advisory Board Terry Williams Position #7 Term expires March 31, 2004 Don Lincoln, Police Lieutenant, introduced Mr. Williams, a new resident to the City. Interested in obtaining a Private Investigator's license, Mr. Williams believes this to be a professional "fit" for the Board. HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO APPOINT TERRY WILLIAMS TO THE COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING CITIZENS' ADVISORY BOARD, POSITION #7, WITH A TERM TO EXPIRE MARCH 31, 2004. The motion carried 6 - Elda Mercado Position #4 Term expires April 30, 2004 CITIZEN COMMENT /CORRESPONDENCE: None. •. rH; Rr cmmyr�r�am :y+:o*rR^•»,*�.�a+�«ene +. ATTACHMENT B Evelyn Boykan, Human Services Manager, introduced Ms. Mercado, a 12 -year resident of the City. Fluent in both English and Spanish and having 18 years' experience with non - profit agencies, Ms. Mercado is turning her focus more specifically to her own community. HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO APPOINT ELDA MERCADO TO THE HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD, POSITION #4, WITH A TERM TO EXPIRE APRIL 30, 2004. The motion carried 6 -0. City of Tukwila Page 2 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes — August 18, 2003 (Regular) b. Approval of Vouchers — 301282- 301540, in the amount of $1,251,708.21 c. Intra - Project Funds Transfer — Foster Clubhouse Improvement Project z DUFFIE MOVED; HERNANDEZ SECONDED; APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.* z Discussion: While reviewing vouchers, Ms. Hernandez saw one for $8,455.60 payable to James Codiga, 6 v for beauty bark. Ms. Hernandez needed affirmation that this is an issue separate from recent property 0 co 0 0 purchase transactions with Mr. Codiga. Mayor Mullet confirmed the same. J = * The motion carried 6 -0. cn u w PUBLIC HEARING: J Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, including c d = w z f.. 1- O Z I— W W U � U Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development, noted this evening's public hearing is on the o'- subject of proposed comprehensive plan amendments for 2003. Those proposed amendments have been = w reviewed (first) by the City Council, (second) the Planning Commission, and are now returning to the full f- r—, Council, with recommendations from the Planning Commission. �'-- O w z ci) H= O Three proposed amendments for 2003 include: 1. A comprehensive plan and Zoning Code amendment to allow office use as Stand Alone Uses in the MIC /H• designation of the Duwamish Corridor. 2. Revisions to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance policies in order to bring them into compliance with "best available science" requirements of State law. 3. A rezone from Low Density Residential to Office for property located at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. Once public testimony is considered, Council may approve amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, make modifications to the recommendations, reject the proposed amendments or defer the amendments until a subsequent year for consideration. 7:18 p.m. Mayor Mullet opened the public hearing. Addressing proposed amendment number 1, Mr. Lancaster relayed that under the current Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code designation, Office uses are allowed in the MIC /H area only when they are supportive of manufacturing or other permitted uses in that district. The proposal which came forward allows stand -alone office as its own use in this area. The Planning Commission recommends support of the proposed amendment, subject to a conditional use permit, with a maximum size of 100,000 gross square feet in floor area, per lot, legally established on the effective date of the ordinance, or before. No new offices shall be allowed on lots that abut the Duwamish River, and are north of the Turning Basin. Any existing office development (established prior to the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan [1995]) shall be allowed to exceed the 100,000 gross square foot maximum, and become legal conforming uses through the conditional use permit process. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY'S 1995 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND AMENDING TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS TO ALLOW LIMITED OFFICE USE IN THE MIC/H ZONE; AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1865 AND 1758 AS CODIFIED IN TMC SECTION 18.38.040; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ; Jrrw *n!e!.�p xmra- .ox5*+r •.rS'rzwc3!*k'rt+�;w!gW z City of Tukwila Page 3 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 Shaunta Hvde, Manager, Government Relations, Boeing, P. O. Box 3707, MC 14 - 49, Seattle, WA, 98124 read a letter into the record on behalf of her employer. Said letter speaks in support of the Planning Commission's recommendations, yet seeks to include "all property in the Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC). Several existing office buildings could become non - conforming uses if shoreline properties are carved out of the zoning reform as suggested by the Planning Commission." Additionally, Ms. Hyde brought one of Boeing's Strategic Planners and one of their Development Managers for the Tukwila Corridor should questions arise from the Council. Councilmember Linder stated her understanding that dredging the river would be difficult and expensive. She asked if the Army Corps of Engineers would grant a permit for it. John Powers, Warren Realty, same address as Ms. Hvde, stated one of the biggest problems with dredging the river is the Army Corps of Engineers currently takes 7 to 10 years to obtain required permits. This includes studies and related issues. As it relates to proposed amendment #2, Mr. Lancaster relayed the Planning Commission recommends deferring consideration of the item until 2004. Staffing levels and current workloads do not allow for appropriate amounts of review, study and /or work necessary. No citizen comments were received on this issue. As it relates to proposed amendment #3, Mr. Lancaster described this proposal as being brought forth by the property owner for property located at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. The request seeks to amend zoning from Low Density Residential to Office. Review of the proposal brought about complications and problems, with two primary issues being discrepancies related to property boundaries and access limitations to the property. If denied, the applicant intends to reapply if complications are resolved. The Planning Commission recommends denial of this proposal. City staff received a letter today from a representative of the applicant. A copy of the letter was provided to Council. The letter, addressed to Rebecca Fox, was penned by Eric LaBrie, AICP, Senior Planner, with Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and notified Ms. Fox that the applicant (Eric Robb) has requested deferral of his proposed amendment until 2004 "in order to resolve issues that were raised during this year's "review." If Council approves deferral, it means the applicant would not have to reapply. Staff will gather new information and the item would be "carried into next year's program automatically." If Council denies the deferral, the applicant is forced to submit a reapplication and pay a reapplication fee of approximately $1,000.00. Anna Bernhard, 14241 — 59 Avenue South, Tukwila, when reviewing the site recently, called it an "insane plan to have people working in that building and coming down that steep little driveway." She hopes the applicant can figure other ways to enter the site. 7:37 p.m. Mayor Mullet closed the public hearing. COUNCIL DELIBERATION: Councilmember Duffle spoke in favor of denying proposed amendment #3. Councilmembers Hernandez, Haggerton, Linder, Fenton and Simpson all concurred. Ms. Hernandez asked if Ms. Carter would be able to vote on other items if she was absent during the public hearing. Councilmember Linder was in favor of waiting until Ms. Carter returned. Ms. Hernandez was comfortable with taking action on proposed amendments #2 and #3 and deferring action on proposed amendment #1. DUFFIE MOVED; UNDER SECONDED; DENIAL OF L02 - 067 AND L02 - 068. The motion carried 6 -0. ' Arvt,M?G(onk4.1 1!!4.rmu.*f..!i • City of Tukwila Page 4 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 HERNANDEZ MOVED; HAGGERTON SECONDED; DEFERRING ACTION ON L02 - 064 AND L02- 065. The motion carried 6 - 0. HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO LEAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO CONSIDER ITEMS L02 -062 AND L02 -063 ON SEPTMEBER 15, 2003. The motion carried 6 - UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a. Sewer Utility Rates 1. Proposed resolution amending Public Works Fee Schedule A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004. Jim Morrow, Director of Public Works, reminded Council of staffs request to raise the existing sewer rates. Using a single - family residence as an example, Mr. Morrow noted the City currently charges $28.40 per month. The proposed rate is $2.00 higher per month, thus $30.40. Mr. Morrow then reviewed the Public Works Fee Schedule with the $2.00 increase, set for an effective date of January 1, 2004. Sewer rates have not been increased since 1996 in Tukwila and current fees are significantly lower than the average of neighboring jurisdictions. Discussion took place between Council and Mr. Morrow. Clarification, where necessary, was provided. FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO HAVE THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION READ BY TITLE ONLY. The motion carried 6 -0. Steve King, City Attorney, read the title of the proposed resolution. HAGGERTON MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. The motion carried 6 - 0. APPROVED RESOLUTION #1531 2. Proposed ordinance amending permit & inspection fees, and rates for sewer services and penalties AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TMC CHAPTER 14.12, RELATING TO PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES; AMENDING TMC CHAPTER 14.16, RELATING TO THE RATES FOR SEWER SERVICE AND PENALTY CHARGES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 936 AND 1776; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Jim Morrow reviewed the proposed ordinance with Council and noted the ordinance would go into effect beginning January 1, 2004. The bills, however, will not change until the 1s of February, 2004 as meters will be read in January. That is the intent of the language within the proposed ordinance. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO HAVE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE READ BY TITLE ONLY. The motion carried 6 -0. Steve King, City Attorney, read the title of the proposed ordinance. DUFFIE MOVED; HERNANDEZ SECONDED; TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED.* City of Tukwila City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6 September 2, 2003 John Crull, Boeing Company, P. O. Box 3707 — MC7X - 71, Seattle, Washington, asked whether Section 4 of the proposed ordinance is a newly proposed addition to the ordinance or has it always existed. Mr. Morrow responded Section 4 removes reference to "the flat rate." Shaunta Hyde, Boeing Company, P. O. Box 3707 — MC14 - 49, Seattle, Washington, acknowledged current budget issues facing the City, yet requested future proposed utility or sewer zz increases be mailed to businesses letting them know directly. Councilmember Hernandez noted continued availability of reduced rates for Senior Citizens who apply for j such reduction. J 0 00 *The motion carried 6 -0. w = r- APPROVED ORDINANCE #2026 co w u. Bruce Fletcher, Director, Parks and Recreation, reported review of this item by two Council Committees cn and the Council Committee of Whole. He requested Council grant permission to increase the current 1/2- W time position of Facilities Operation Technician (Tukwila Pool Operator) be increased to full time. Z O w ~ 2 w O • 92 o I- w W • O W Z U Cr) O I— REPORTS: b. Aquatics Facilities Operation Technician Revenues are currently exceeding expectations and continued revenue receipts should meet funding of the position. HERNANDEZ MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO INCREASE THE FACILITIES OPERATION TECHNICIAN POSITION FROM .5 FTE TO FULL TIME. The motion carried 6 - a. Mayor Mayor Mullet introduced Mr. Fletcher who reported on happenings at Crestview Park. Mr. Fletcher noted Curt Treadwell, a neighbor to the park, has been disturbed (recently) with watchdogs and other things that bother him in light of the fact he works an odd schedule. In a voicemail (today) to Mr. Fletcher, Mr. Treadwell stated his dissatisfaction with park users, the need for moving of a picnic shelter, moving of a play structure and his desire to move a couple trees so that his satellite TV dish is not obstructed. Mr. Treadwell intended to "go over" Mr. Fletcher's head to meet with Police Chief Haines and Mayor Mullet to bring some resolve to these issues, not to mention more signage, changing of park hours, removal of basketball hoops, and other similarly related issues. Mr. Fletcher suggests referral of the issues to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee for review as Mr. Treadwell is unhappy with Mr. Fletcher and decisions he makes. Mayor Mullet spoke to Mr. Treadwell and they discussed costs necessary to fix the problems as well as the potential for adjusting park hours. Ultimately, however, Council must make decisions on requests being brought forward. This item was discussed amongst Councilmembers and then to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee for consideration. b. City Council Councilmember Duffle enjoyed a recent swim at the City of Tukwila Pool. Additionally, Mr. Duffle and Ms. Lauterbach had a recent opportunity to meet with Muhammed Accord (a Somali leader). They spoke of issues regarding the number of Somali population within Tukwila schools and the potential need for a full -time interpreter on staff. Dr. Michael Silver suggested to Mr. Duffle that the need truly does not exist for a full -time interpreter. v,?rrralYa.1011ft 'w1.^' A'f' 5 z City of Tukwila Page 6 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 Mr. Duffle reported on today's Finance and Safety Committee meeting. There, a recommendation was formulated (for consideration by Council) to hold the annual Council retreat within the Tukwila City limits. This was done in order to set an example as it relates to budget cuts and constraints within City government. Councilmembers Fenton and Hernandez supported that recommendation verbally. Finally, Mr. Duffle reminded all present that Tukwila Schools opened today and to be mindful of the children on and near the roads. z Councilmember Hernandez attended the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting on August re w 26, 2003 and today's Tukwila Business and Government Affairs meeting. JU Councilmember Haggerton had no report. co o co ui Lu Coun cilmember Linder had no report. co w Councilmember Fenton had no report. w Councilmember Simpson attended the recent Highway 99 Action Committee clean -up effort. a w Z F. I- 0 Z I- LL! o . 0 to 0- 0I-- w w H p LI O Z w 0 c. City Staff: Rhonda Berry was absent. d. Legislative Analyst Lucy Lauterbach reminded Council of the September 16, 5:30 p.m., budget review meeting. e. City Attorney Steve King had no report. ADJOURN: 8:30 p.m. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING. The motion carried 6 -0. O ek.ittv\ 1V" ?V\ urfa,-. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Date Minutes Signed: September 15, 2003. ( - ( / Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Z Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, a,,rtxC HEREBY DECLARE THAT: / ' Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: II ('j C. RIdolo Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: Loo - f e: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance D . Mailer's Signature: &te4alcul Rcer. Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Person requesting m a i l i n g : c ( c- a I1( Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt . Official Notice . Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM day of in the Project Name: II ('j C. RIdolo Project Number: Loo - f e: D . Mailer's Signature: &te4alcul Rcer. 4 Person requesting m a i l i n g : c ( c- a I1( Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM day of in the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Eric Robb /Barghausen Consulting Engineers has filed an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan (File #L02 -067) and Zoning Code (File #L02 -068) maps at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. The existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation is Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant is requesting a rezone and Comprehensive Plan map amendment to Office (0). The Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing to give residents and businesses an opportunity to express their opinions and give testimony about the proposal: Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2003 Time: 7 p.m. Place: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner of the Tukwila Department of Community Development at 206 - 431 - 3683. Written comments are welcome. Please address comments to Rebecca Fox, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 or via e - mail to rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us. If desired, written comments may also be presented in person at the City Council meeting on September 2, 2003. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 a .ILDR Tukwila Blvd t MDR MAIM S153St m uuiu a HDR 0003200019 fA nt TUC RCM Legend Zoning Designations LDR Low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential HDR High Density Residential TUC Tukwila Urban Center RCM Regional Commercial Mixed Use 0 Office A Subject Properties Xw\ \ N GIS Tukwila 1 " =.5 Mile TUC City of Tukwila Department of Community Development L02 -067 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proposed) L02 -068 Zoning Code Amendment (Proposed) 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd Request Low Density Residential to Office NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ®0915 iasei * * ** WinMetro Label Set * * ** Date :12/31/2002 Report : Avery 5160 Laser Labels 3 Acros S'Th : PARCEL G.....1t : 18 Beta Holdings Limited Partnership 18827 Bothell Way NE Bothell, WA 98011 Housing Authority Of King C 15455 65Th Ave S Tukwila, WA 98188 Royal Coachman Associates 8009 S 180Th St Kent, WA 98032 William Eric Robb 6542 S 154Th St Tukwila, WA 98188 Equilon Enterprises Llc PO Box 4453 Houston, TX 77210 Home Electric Company 2366 Eastlake Ave E #312 Seattle, WA 98102 ®O915 Jo4 aleidwaT asn For: of By : James Nelsen & S Frohmuth Loren 16113 W Valley Hwy Tukwila, WA 98188 Schneider Homes Inc 6510 Southcenter Blvd . Tukwila, WA 98188 Ricky & Rena Burns 23812 102Nd Ave SE Kent, WA 98031 Mustang Lie PO Box 88162 Seattle, WA 98138 Crim Investments PO Box 30182 Seattle, WA 98103 Julia Shozen 15415 65Th Ave S Tukwila, WA 98188 s�age� ssaippy Recs Processed : 25 Dups Screened : 6 CRs Screened : 0 Bad Addresses : 1 Labels Produced : 18 ©AU Schneider Gerald E g15523 7517 Greenwood Ave N Seattle, WA 98103 Kevin Klotz 6532 S 154Th St Tukwila, WA 98188 Of Tukwil 6200 So ter Blvd Tukw WA 9 Lowefs: Ese. ie Hardware & Garden Inc 101 Andover Park E 1200 Tukwila, WA 98188 Pitney Bowes Properties Inc 1 Elmcroft Rd Stamford, CT 06926 Michael Alhadeff 6305 Beach Dr SW Seattle, WA 98136 N.ispags poi Looms Z 2 ° W CC 2 00 w W I � W O 2 ¢. w 0 =d Z � F- O Z W 2 j: U D — :0 W w 0 2 LL iii U =. O ~. Z c PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MINUTES JUNE 26, 2003 The Public Hearing was called to order by Chair Whisler at 7:00 PM. Present: Excused Absence: Representing City Staff: ATTACHMENT B Chair, Kirstine Whisler, Vice Chair, George Malina, Commissioners: Vern Meryhew, Bill Arthur, and Henry Marvin. Margaret Bratcher and Allan Ekberg Steve Lancaster, Rebecca Fox, Minnie Dhaliwal, and Wynetta Bivens. GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE WORKSESSION MINUTES FROM MAY 22, 2003. VERN MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES FROM MAY 22, 2003. VERN MERYBEW SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. CASE NUMBER: L03 -002 APPLICANT: Stephen B. Meadows for Nextel Communications (withdrawn by the applicant – to be re- scheduled at a later date) Rebecca Fox gave a brief overview with some background on the three proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendments. CASE NUMBERS: L02 -062, L02 -063 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to allow office uses in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (M/IC -H) zones. LOCATION: All M/IC -H zones citywide, Tukwila, WA Minnie Dhaliwal gave the presentation for staff. Staff recommended a combination of option B (1) and B (4) B. Modify the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code 1. Allow some office use but limit the size to 100,000 sq. ft. and list it as a conditional use to address traffic mitigation. No change is required to the County Wide Planning Policies. It will require Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. 4. Allow all existing office development to continue to be used for office use. This would allow offices that are currently accessory to other permitted uses to be used as stand alone offices. Existing office buildings associated with manufacturing uses and exceeding 100,000 sq. ft. could be allowed to convert to stand alone office uses subject to a Conditional Use permit. Shaunta Hyde, from the Boeing Company gave testimony in support of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Amendments. The Boeing Company agrees with staff's recommendation as they represent a good balance for the future. Ms. Hyde also answered questions. Minnie Dhaliwal and Steve Lancaster answered several additional questions for the Commission. Staff will provide the Planning Commission with the current price value for the industrial zone lands vs. the office zone land. The Planning Commission asked staff to take a look at the possibility of preserving the area along side of the river where there is availability to deeper waters for industrial use only. Staff will prepare an ordinance based on the Planning Commission's recommendation for their review. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. z The Commission deliberated. H w VERN MERYHEW MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 6 rt D RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L02 -062, L02 -063 FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN v p AMENDMENT /ZONING CODE WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE PROPOSED BE LIMITED TO THE co 0 PROPERTIES THAT ARE NOT ABBUTTING THE RIVER. BILL ARTHUR SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL J H VOTED IN FAVOR. ( u_ w 0 CASE NUMBERS: L02 -064, L02 -065 2 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila g 5 REQUEST: Approve future amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code as it pertains to N Sensitive /Critical Areas to include Best Available Science, and other issues per Growth Management = w Act requirements. z i LOCATION: All properties designated environmentally "Sensitive Areas" throughout Tukwila, WA H p z I- w Rebecca Fox gave the presentation for staff. Staff is working on incorporating a review of "Best Available Science ", which 2 D is a State of Washington requirement. Staff will bring proposed changes to the Commission for consideration prior to the v 2004 deadline. At this time staff recommends approving a general "placeholder" amendment to the Comprehensive Plan p H which updates the Sensitive Areas/Natural Environment related policies to reflect changes in the Growth Management Act w w requirements including consideration of `Best Available Science." . U u_O The Planning Commission expressed some confusion regarding this amendment and their roll with this amendment. w z UN Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development provided clarification by giving some background. Mr. p H Lancaster explained what staff is in the process of doing, and he also, explained what the Planning Commission's roll is in z the process. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. The Commission deliberated. VERN MERYHEW MADE A MOTION TO DEFER CASE NUMBER L02 -064, L02 -065 FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT /ZONING CODE UNTIL 2004. BILL ARTHUR SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. CASE NUMBERS: L02 -067, L02 -068 APPLICANT: Eric Robb/Barghausen Consulting REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code designations from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) LOCATION: 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Rebecca Fox gave the presentation for staff. Given the property's encroachment issues, site development constraints including steep slopes and difficult access, and the availability of office use in other zones, staff recommended denial of the applicant's request at this time. Further staff recommended that if the applicant can resolve property encroachment issues and etrzi pd_ min/tyres (1/0,1 °3 1., • develop a feasible alternative access plan by December 31, 2003, then the City will consider the request as part of the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code update in 2004. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. Z The Commission deliberated. w GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND o RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L02 -067, L02 -068 FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN co o AMENDMENT /ZONING CODE. HENRY MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. J = F- Chair Whisler called a five minute recess. w 0 The public hearing reconvened. g Q co s ca BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING _ ZF- Chair Whisler swore in those wishing to provide testimony. z O LU ill CASE NUMBER: L03 -035 v 0 APPLICANT: Starfire Sports, Christopher G. Slatt, President and CEO 0 - REQUEST: Design Review for Starfire Sports project that includes upgrading athletic fields (addition of synthetic o F- turf to four existing soccer fields and development of three new synthetic soccer fields), construction of = v a 84,074 square feet athletic building with two indoor soccer fields, construction of a maintenance building and a cover over an existing grandstand. .. z LOCATION: Fort Dent Park, east of Interurban Avenue and north of Fort Dent Boulevard (adjacent to the Green v co River) in Tukwila WA. o H Z Minnie Dhaliwal gave the presentation for staff. Staff recommended approval of the Design Review application. Bruce Fetcher, Director, Parks and Recreation, the lead staff on the project, gave some history on how the City acquired the park and how Starfire entered into an agreement with the City. Mr. Fetcher explained what the agreement entitles and how it will allow the City to keep the park open. Mr. Fetcher expressed the agreement between the City and Starfire as a true winning partnership that will give the residents a quality 54 -acre sports park. Christopher Slatt, for the applicant, explained how Starfire came to approach the City with the idea of a non - profit organization to create, "a world class facility". Jud Youell, Landscape architect, for the applicant, described what the Sports Park would offer, discussed the design of the field, and the material used for turf on the field, and the advantages of using the material. Mr.Youell also explained what will happen with the landscaping, as well as, answered questions. Christopher Slatt, answered questions concerning parking issues. Mr. Slatt explained it's hard to model parking and that they did the best they could to estimate from experience and by talking to others. Mr. Slatt stated Starfire is required to provide a monitoring plan, which the City must approve. Don Carlson, architect, for the appliant, gave an overview discussing the characteristics of the building. Mr. Carlson stated his company has learned a lot of lessons about how to make large buildings friendly to the environment, stating it's the kind of background they are bringing to the project. Q:\PLANCOM\MINUTES\6-26-03.doc - !.a:.:'M.:+k_� ��.n7�.:....A ..- ...:...�`� 5 ... ! ' 7 `.w°' " 4..�..t 4 '�",•.,- 1� wm` t ...'.. * :«:'':"�'. •I � +, d *m ;�� r � . 3 oF4 PC, m (nfz6. /O3 x.e��:x_� ,_ �^ e�^ �, �m: rmm„ r. �,rro1 ±>'rw:�'Sr�tr�t:�^,gt�'� Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development, provided clarification to some additional questions raised by the Planning Commission, regarding the parking issues. Mr. Lancaster explained there are two studies going -on, 1) a very specific parking management strategy, which needs to be approved by him, as the City's SEPA official, before Starfire can occupy the facility. The second study is a traffic analysis, to determine the traffic impact. This will be a program to monitor those events that are too hard to analyze before they happen. Mr. Lancaster also, addressed a question regarding handicap access. Mr. Lancaster stated that the project would be evaluated against the Washington State Accessibility code as part of the building permit review process. There must be a sufficient number of handicap parking spaces based on an analysis of the occupancy of the structure, and if possible the spaces must be located to prevent people from crossing drive ways or other obstacles. Christopher Slatt addressed a question regarding when the food court will be open. Mr. Slatt hopes the concession will be open as often as people want to use it, the main purpose of the concession is to support the athletes and the events. Starfire also addressed a question regarding the location of their trash. Public Testimony: None Rebuttal: None There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. The Commission deliberated. Commissioner Malina suggested that discounts for Tukwila residents and also the handicapped, be considered. HENRY MARVIN MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L03 -035 FOR A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT. GEORGE MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. DIRECTOR REPORT • Commissioner Meryhew requested that staff forward the information regarding the current price value for the industrial zone land vs. the office zone to the City Council, and himself. • Chair Whisler requested a calendar of the next six months Planning Commission meetings. • Chair Whisler reported she would be absent from the August Planning Commission meeting. Adjourned at 9:55PM Respectfully Submitted Wynetta Bivens Administrative Secretary Q :\P LANCOM \MINUTES \6- 26- 03.doc 4 CF4( pc+ nfaTE5 z _I- '~' w QQ � J U 00 0 • Lu Lu - _ U) u_ w gQ = d w z � I= 0 z I— w • w U O O - O I— w W I I— H u" w Z 0 • ~ z • June 12; 2003 Mr. Gerald Schneider 6510 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr. and Mrs. Johnny 15460 65 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: 3.40.55 Street Vacation — Macadam Road from Southcenter Boulevard to Old Bluff Road On August 15, 2002, the City Council passed Ordinance 1993 approving the vacation of Macadam Road from Southcenter Boulevard to Old Bluff Street,providing the conditions stipulated in Section 2 of the ordinance are met. A copy of the ordinance is enclosed. This vacation expires on September 30, 2003, if the conditions have not been met by this date. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206 - 433 -0179, Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM. Sincerely, L. Jill Mosqueda enclosure (1) cc: Moira Bradshaw Jim Morrow Brian Shelton City Clerk City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Public Works James F. Morrow, P.E., Director (P :Laurie Admin /)iII /3.40.55 Expiration Letter Macadam) Mr. Kevin Klotz 6532 S. 154 St (Southcenter Blvd.) Tukwila, WA 98188 Ms. Mary Lamping Puget Sound Energy Real Estate Department MS OBC-11N 411 108t Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite # /00 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -433 -0/79 • Fax: 20o -131 -3005 . ruym 0 ,�:.'7°98'5m"'�"�t'o�r.±rr�r... .. .EL'k^' >mu..sr .;w�saaa�w7�i+ava: mti73t t!FA'tk�.<.. ...emu . t? Rt+ - it GH4u \s, w v < 4. 0. I 'd%G ENG1N -� Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 May 16, 2003 COURIER DELIVERY RE: Boundary and Partial Topographic Survey Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment Application 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washington City of Tukwila File Nos. E02 -024, L02-067, and L02 -068 Our Job No. 10751 Dear Ms. Fox: On behalf of our client Ivlr. Eric Robb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., is submitting four copies of a boundary and partial topographic survey dated May 6, 2003. The survey is being sent in response to your request for additional information letter dated March 27, 2003, which requested a site survey showing the precise location of the existing buildings in relation to the property lines. It was further noted in the request that: "A complete topographic survey is not necessary at this time." Our client is currently negotiating a possible boundary line adjustment of the north property line of Tax Lot 19; therefore, our client, Mr. Robb, does not wish City staff to contact any neighboring property owners regarding the boundary line adjustment or encroachment issues. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (425) 251 -6222. Thank you. Respectfully, Di / I t fl Harley attson Project Planner HMM /tep 10751c.006.doc enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Eric Robb Mr. Eric G. LaBrie, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES A e=r7 crU c 1ie-rl i/ ) 7-7 - 3 3 7 cPOD 't� j c� ,s • 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com RECEIVED Mg 1 6 2003. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Harley Mattson Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. 18215 72 Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032 March 27, 2003 Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan change/Rezone at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Dear Ms. Mattson: As a result of the March 17, 2003 public meeting, the Tukwila City Council and Mayor have requested additional information to help them evaluate your client Eric Robb's request for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map changes from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) at 6542 and 6550 Southcenter Boulevard. Please provide the following information by April 21, 2003: • Site survey showing the precise location of the existing buildings in relation to the property lines. A complete topographic survey is not necessary at this time. • Traffic and access study containing the following: 1. Inventory Site conditions A. Existing land use 1. Site physical characteristics a. lot size(s), configuration, boundaries b. topography c. contours d. driveway(s) location and grade B. Proposed land use 1. Changed use 2. Other properties /developments in vicinity 2. Transportation system A. Existing right -of -way B. Street network including intersections and geometrics C. Site access point(s) D. Traffic volumes including turning movement counts E. Safety evaluation 1. Accident data, last 3 years Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 3. Development related traffic A. Trip generation, peak hour B. Trip distribution C. Trip assignment D. Driveway volumes including directional and turning movement E. Driveway design; width (25 feet min.), throat length, grade, throat length F. Access alternatives G. Potential site constraints 1. Parking requirements 2. on -site circulation H. Queuing analysis I. LOS analysis As we discussed by phone, we will need the complete information by April 21, 2003 so that the Tukwila Planning Commission will be able to place the project on the agenda for their May 22, 2003 meeting. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via e -mail at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions about this request. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner 2. Sight distance .,.,.. ..;: �•�.= .w'v:• :.".p:iu:4�.t .:.:,c� n;`� �:.. `qo. T ya . at�lHtra'. �- ,n.i ad�u a: • • 4 GEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Fidelity National Titre C'om ,4 4 � o Washington ty .� .� f 1! ?1Ci = "li i t'22 by Fidelity National Title .r:.':.{1? a:2C'1? Compal,v 3500 188t1h Street SW 3:300 Lynnwood. h'a hi?)grcu? 98037 (206) 771 -30.31 / 527 -143 Pax No. (206) 670 -146' Direct Lilts (206) 640-3502 / 640 -350 L'NIT 3 UNIT: Patty Seeley - O'Brien Senior Title Officer Heidi Foote, Assi_stantTitJP Officer TO: EVERGREEN PACIFIC SERVICES 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S. #255 TUKWILA, WA 98168 -0000 Attention : DARRELL NASH Your Number : Reference Name: ROBB, ERIC HENKE, IRMA TITLE ORDER NUMBER: 0158650 Commitment Effective Date: March 7, 1997 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be Issued: - ALTA Owners Policy - 1992 Form Standard Coverage General Schedule Rate Proposed Insured: ERIC ROBB, a single person - ALTA Loan Policy - 1992 Form Extended Coverage Simultaneous Rate Proposed Insured: APPROPRIATE LENDER - Easement Charge 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Commitment i s a fee simple estate, as to Parcel A and an easement estate, as to Parcel 33. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: A. F. HENKE and IRMA H. HENKE, his wife 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and is described as follows: See Attached u�#• ania6'rY,'c�Ssati'- :�^+krLW�� =�: ;:ti.' �Gw'�,, aii- ^� -F =�' �jt `- %:rim:a v�+D.ri.-dsa•;. _,- .:inwr' as . ..a. TITLE ORDER NXJ 1 ER: 01 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A TO:425 251 8782 Amount : $ Premium : $ Sales Tax: $ Cory Dennis, Title Assistant 135,000.00 640.00 52.48 Amount : $ 128,250.00 Premium : $ 285.00 Sales Tax: $ 23.37 Premium : $ 50.00 Sales Tax: $ 4.10 P.002 ,DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 y (9 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 2 Order No. 0158650 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: u That portion of W.N. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, Section 23, Township 23- North, Range- 4- Ea -s-t, W.M., i-n King C ounty; Wash as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract 28, OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89 °47' East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet; THENCE South 24 °25' East 65 feet; THENCE South 68 °00' West 155.16 feet; THENCE North 22 °00' West 127.54 feet to the South line of Tract 27 of said Plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle; THENCE South 89 °47' East along said South line 143.55 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. PARCEL B: TO:425 251 8782 P.003 An easement for roadway and utilities 40 feet wide, being 20 feet in width on each side of the following described center line; Beginning at a point on the South line of Tract 28 OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, according to Plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington, which is South 89 °47'00" East 44.00 feet from the Southwest corner of said Tract 28; THENCE South 24 °25'00" East to an intersection with the Northerly margin of the Renton -Three Tree Point Road. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. z w - 00 � 0. W = w • 0 J ? . 0 =w F- z F. F. wo U • � O - O I-- w O IA Z I ` O z DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 -- Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 3 Order No. 0158650 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued): TO:425 251 8782 P.004 NOTE _EORLLNEQRMAUIONAL_PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. SE SE 523 TWP23 R4 DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Fidelity National T zl e Company of Washington - ALTA Cofmi tment . Page 4 —• Order Nn, 0158650 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly— executed —de -1 i- ve•r -ed— and —dul -y filed for — record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created. first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of 06 land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts, in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materials theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal, 8. "Reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights. including easements or equitable servitude." SCHEDULE B TO:425 251 8782 P.005 z ~ w Q : JU U co J = w 2 u. co = w F- = z � I— 0 Z ~ U • co O co CI F- W W F1- O Z = z DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 F'de1 i!y f':.tional Ti;Ie Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 5 Order No. 0158650 C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS I. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property if unpaid. The subject property is located in the City of Tukwila. The excise tax rate is 1.53% as of January 1, 1992. 2. GENERAL TAXES PAYABLE AFTER FEBRUARY 15TH: THE FIRST HALF TAXES ARE - DUE — PRIOR TO MAY 1ST; THE SECOND HALF TAXES ARE DUE PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1ST: Year: 1997 Amount Billed: $1,542.70 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $1,542.70 Tax Account No.: 000320- 0018 -03 The above amount is a TOTAL of the following charges: General Taxes: $1,542.70 Levy Code: 2380 Value of Land: $34,200.00 Value of Improvements: $67,100.00 3 To provide an Extended Coverage Lenders Policy, General Exceptions 1, 5 and 7 are hereby deleted. General Exceptions 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 will be considered when our Inspection and /or Survey, if required, is completed. A Supplemental iteport will follow. We will inform you later whether the 100 Endorsement will issue with the forthcoming lenders policy. The Owner's Policy will be in Standard form only, unless otherwise requested and approved. 4. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD ": If the subject property. is or will be the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be held as a separate or community interest, execution of the proposed conveyance, contract to convey, or encumbrance must be by both husband and wife by reason of RCW 6.13 which provides for "automatic homestead ". EXECUTION UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL NOT PROVE ACCEPTABLE UNLESS FIRST APPROVED BY THIS COMPANY. 5. The legal description shown in Schedule A was determined from the property address provided at the time of application. The description should be examined and approved by all the parties to this transaction prior to closing. 6. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: May 13, 1905 Recording No.: 337820 Purpose: Water pipes Affects: E 18 (Underterminable) TO:425 251 8782 P.006 DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 L f Fidelity National TAle Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 6 Order No. 0158650 7. EASEMENT.AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT: z Recorded: April 3, 1909 a z Recording No.: 605842 w cc Purpose: Iron water pipe Affects: E 18 -JO 00 8. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: co U) LLI ecorded: August 4, 1924 w = Record No.: 1961223 u) o In Favor Of: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company w Purpose: Poles 2 Affects: E 18 w 9. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: = d Recorded: August 14, 1957 ~ z Recording No.: 4824256 z ~ In Favor Of: Washington Natural Gas Company w o Purpose: pipeline or lines w Affects: Portion of Parcel A D o 10. SIDE SEWER EASEMENT ANDCONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: o 1— Recorded: .March 2, 1965 w w Recording No.: 5849828 ! Width: 6 feet -u.- z Affects: An undisclosed portion of said premises along the line w as constructed U 01— Said easement contains a provision for bearing a proportionate or equal cost of z maintenance, repair or reconstruction of said sewer by the common users. 11. ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: October 11, 1993 Recording No.: 9310110145 NOTE 1: NOTE 2: The address of the property is: 6542 South 154th Street Tukwila, Washington 98188 END OF SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS END OF NOTES TO:425 251 8782 P.007 • o Examination of the records discloses no judgments or other matters pending against the name(s) of Eric Robb, a single person, the proposed insured. rtXiyj �s `„1'e`r.fSG.tiro's1�f4)�JW'� i1i 41.41w, DEC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Gregory 0. Debay, Atty 162 S. #9 Tukwila, Wa 98188 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 7 -- Order No. 0158650 3/17/97 DC /kc cc: :" TO:425 251 8782 P.008 In the event this transaction fails to close and this Commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed Schedule of this Company. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALF. • Mb5iw:4ti4" , �•• ,�• ••�... �,.s.f. �.+..4_.va.J.�'al tnz...l'h4 an'1 ..k X•.ef. ,.« viii;!yu_ ?: s ips:± �.•% at,,"., L. t.,. uu15 _:fwx:i�= i.i.:3k.+�'F�.Sii;' �w,v:�.: OEC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Fic161.ity Natio €Eat Title Company of Washington ORDER NL'MEER , C+ ( S t � SECTION Z 3 TOWNSHIP L 3 RANGE 4 - s (_) 1* ER BIND. �.. tNrO R .ot So 10f �YCr µw y � 1) Pszttn SR 40 GRSSN RGµpNG; FZ1vt 1N'�E R o O y0 y (f TO:425 251 8782 ins :LJS4 „�� 1 ?O` s% Ap A3 0 �} t t� ^J , e L ' �. P.009 r �S qd 5 . „4 This sketch is provided as a courtesy only by Fidelity National Title Company of Washington, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to be a Plat of Survey to show all mantra relating to the property (including, but not limited to area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or locatoin of boundaries). It is not a pert of, nor does it modify, the Title Commitment or Policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIADIUTY for the correctness of any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further Information. .. _ .�nmrM�,,; see. rn. M+ v+ nerr�a ++rRS7...rrnraaexw..:.rscv +nsw a r.w.as:*x o^n.- r.• e! x�nr�^eM: "' t`srT. '.` :7": 9 A• rttrYt .,..-'':, .-t'� ntf. 150, v v v olviu4 5'074-e. (Ltd- n , .- 11) , ti 1. z..cr- IQ/ va etikci (A.A. p e 4 /4,1 :k.(ttk <. • (p)rtVi I 5 O"‘ 4 0/ O 1, ti A. r. ft(' ( Cw7ut.4 Si-c444, e 1(1 r td. z b"! ?, t o t v V,..V146,94 ' • • - Whi..14.64a1.611- DEC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 First Union Home Equity 3700 Pacific Highway East, #300 Tacoma, Washington 90424 Attention: Jodi Customer Ref.: 2251003508 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OP WASHINGTON, INC. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101 KELLY CORNWALL, Senior Tittle Officer MARIE A. PIERCE, Title Officer unit No. 6 FAX Number 206- 343 -6401 Telephone Number 206- 343 -1335 TO:425 251 8782 P.010 Title Order No.: 376647 A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: March 17, 1999, at 8:00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount • '$30 400.01 to $70,000.00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium $ 90. Tax (8.61) $ 7. G E M RATE NOTEt THIS WORTHCOMING LENDERS POLICY WILL REFLECT TEE SPECIFIC LIABILITY CONTAINED ON TH2 =N$UflBD DEED OF TRUST. Proposed Insured: FIRST UNION HOME EQUITY BANK, its successors and assigns 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested i72: WXJ.LYAM ERIC ROBB, presumptiVely subject to the community interest of his spouse, if married on or betwccn July 21, 199e, and March B, 1999 (NOTE: SEE SPECIAL EXCEPTION NUMBER 5 REGARDING EXECUTION OF THE FORTHCOMING nOCOMEMT (s) TO HE ENSURED). 1. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County Of Ring, State of Washington, and described as follows: AL on Schedule A, page 2, attached. " y y' �`,(; �+ a !'•'�'°ky3�"i., °_„',L,_. "A.SiC Lit_ si. d�i,:. ir, X: Y' va�daE�o-+'"' 11',' e".' XViSiarS�F tlu:`,bes4a��s+'+i",. F't;�wtiti:+Witl>."•.n@ Z Q : 1 0 O 0 co o J • = H W O u. a. 2 O � Z I- 0 W H LLI 0 O N O I- W 2 u. O Z P. w U 0 Z DEC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Nat gnat Title Company of Washington ORDER NUMBER ; c'; t_ E L SECTION L 3 TOWNSHIP i' 3 RANGE f 5N'J•GTC tb . .4 ■ LV � SOVT�C • • E - 5 N �fc6 Potµ RG vol • t 7T'•. � I . SH'R - tL6141et4 1 7 N .11/ 0,14 •1 o R tt.Ai O KI V- SR � NTERGKANc£ A ° • f' I. RIVER �h�, GR ° �t ' 0 V. 0 4 0 0\ \ 0 0 1.5x0 ^ y '' � J v in 0 0 0 •1 r % e, '9 ��1 y / P � 4� /1 u� 43‘ % r � �/� ; y e p , 10) t \0 / n ,t ..g4 t � , aott'• c:f•,LIt. "-tgN R 1 i4 f ∎, O i t • TO:425 251 8782 P.011 0 vas ma C. \ t o • 'A M t , n / c This sketch is provided as a courtesy only by Fidelity National Title Company of Washington, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to be a Plat of Survey to show all matters relating to the properly (including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or locstoin of boundaries). It is not a part of, nor does it modify. the Title Commitment or Policy to which it is auached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for the correctness of any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. EEC -23 -2002 13:16 FROM:WASHINGTON'HOME LOAN 2062433483 From : CPJS t 2/ 4414 Q. : t A . , J1 r2.P ( .- . OYK,141-- J h l' . .,G t , ✓ r./ b. � qu i , vli. 14.'14 ", -..a 1(' i ' •t( G2.(. 5 u 4 '( l&/(-4- kc1411 ors va.exc. 16•414 , re.a rr : .( Of' 1 PHONE No. : 206 938 9457 •.+ b '+ TO:425 251 8782 Mar. 11 1997 3:28PM Pin P.012 z W 00 W F- U) LL, W 0 � co _ W 2 ZF_ F- 0 W F- uj U O — W W • U u"O .. Z W (0 0 Z 0EC -23 -2002 13:16 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Tha land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. N.M., is ttittg 0411nty, Washington, described aft follows: Commencing - the AouL2weaL corner oL Tii �8 of the Plat Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plata, page 55, in King County, Washington; thence south 89 °47' east along the south line of said Tract 2Q, 66 reel, to the true point of beginning; thence south 24 °25 east, 152 feet, more or 1ege, to the northwesterly margin of Secondary State Highway No. 1 - thence northeasterly along said road margin 17R feet, more or leas to its interaece ±on with the south line of .said Tract 28; thanes north 89 meat along said line to'the true point of beginning. RND OF SCHEDULE A NOTE Fos. INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used an an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute For a complete legal description within the bogy of the document. Portion N.H. Gilliam Dt,C No, 40, 23 -23 -04 flT!7 #:,nngrr..rn7 1 - :ton TO:425 251 8782 P.013 Order No. 376647 A.L. T.A. COMM1Traerr ... t. SCR2DULE A Page 2 bEC -23 -2002 13:16 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 flt /C gt/T flPM.gz U B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: TO:425 251 8782 P.014 . 0 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Schedule s Order No. 376647 r. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed far. record, B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Ix. Schedule s of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule-AY-will-contain to the fdllowi.ng matters un1t as the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company; A. Defects, liana, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 1. Rights or claims of parties in posscaedon not shown by the public records a. public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the pub1iC_ record, 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, Labor or material heretofore Or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to peraons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United Staten Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptiona in patents or in At authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, Claims or title to water,... 7. Any eervice,. ,connecLLon, mzeintenance. capacity, or construction :'phargea for sewer, wat air, : . eleCtrioity or garbage retnova1. 6. General taxes n o t now payable or matterb relating to spacial assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal. codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable Servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: An on Schedule 13, attached. 1 76•07 i clo_Di..ri • �#' atarfiwa� WSY. Tjr. „rvtt:'rre��c!+':tr*sr?Jr.,.. �ji Ttt t t Ott nt Tt 119 tints 4 ,,?f ;! a'S”. a +�i2j� 't .' 'f...CL'�'+'n'.,AtyliL'`.Mi.+, GEC -23 -2002 13:17 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 nT /fi uI!TnnP • SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: Q :� NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY : J U 0 EFFECTIVE JANUARY I, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO.AMENDMENT OF WASHMTON co o cow STATE STATUTS9 TO STANDARDIZATION OF :RRCORDRD DOCUMENTS, THIS FOLLOWING FORMAT AND COUNT REQUIRREMENTS MUST BE MET— FAILURE ty TO- COMPLY -MAY RESULT TN HEjECTXON OF TILL DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. O 2 FORMAT: �? N MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 7." ON SIDES AND BOTTOM - 1" W ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OF EACH SUCCEEDING $. RETURN ADDRESS IS _ GAG O1LY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. Z 1- O 2:1-- FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER sirs OP No MORE TERN 2 8 1/2" BY 14". U o • NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; p 1- PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. w w INFORMATION MUCH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE ; :..: • Z Lb RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH! MAY APPEAR WITHIN TIE, UPPER LEFT HAND 3" 1. O z MARGIN. TITLE OR TI7'LE4 OF DOCUMENT. NAMES OF GRANTOR (S) AND GRANTEE (S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGES, IF ANY. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCB, REFERENCE TO RECORDING NUMBER OP SUBJECT DEED OV TRUST. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLATTED) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCXL. NUMBIIR (S) . ,o PIM A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SMEOUr.W fl Page 2 (Continued) 1 PT MT TO:425 251 8782 P.015 Order NO. 376647 I ,,f, n v '� DE -23 -2002 13:17 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 flT I(? ;+1' i T(ftrl .rInfl7 Z 1 1 SPECIAL LxCEPTIONS (continued): - ~ W 1. Agreements, CondltloAB, Covenants, gagecaetcts, ce 2 R.eukricl:ie�nq, Matters pertaining � pertaining to boundary issues, and Servitudes U 0 of any nature whatsoever atteccjng said lands including, but not co Limited to, those which appear in the public records. w= 2.— DELINQURNT— aRtd$RAL —AND —s CXAL TAXES AND CHARGES: ~ WO YEAR: 1998 2 TAX ACCOUNT NV?4 ER: 000320- 0019 -02 LEVY CODE, 2380 W H DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: Z'- AMOUNT BILLED: $1,134.26 {- O AMOUNT PAID: $ 0.00 W'- AMOUNT DUE: $1.1.24.26 2 j . PLUS INTRREST U 3. GENERAL AND SPSCTAT. TAXES AND CHARGES: AxRBT AALF DELINQUENT MAY 2. 0 IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQuENT NOVEMBER 1, IF UNPAID: W W W I- H YEAR: 2999 u- p TAX ACCOUNT N13MBgR; .. 000330- 0019 -03 LL1 Z LEVY COD?: 2300 U CU T,T ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $ 30, 000.00 Z Improvements: $160,000.00 GENERAL TAXES: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: AMOUNT DUE: o 4. DEED OP TRUST ,AND THE TORMs AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: William E. Robb a single person TRUSTEE: TA Service Company, Washington BENEFICIARY: Western Sunrise aka Crossland Mortgage Corp n A.T,.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 $3,062.11 $ 0.00 $3,062.11 (continued) TO:425 251 8782 P.016 Order No. 376647 DEC -23 -2002 13:17 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 5. AMOUNT: $154,000.00 DATED: January 23, 3.999 RECORDED: January 29. 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 9901291169 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assuMed /Mould be ascertained from the - holder - of - the £ndebtedneza secured A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT sCREDULE E Page 4 QUESTION OP THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD": If the subject property in, or will be, the-residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be the separate property of either spouse, execution of the prepoaed encumbrance, conveyance or contract to convey must be by both husband and wife. pursuant to R.C.W. 6.13, which provides for an "automatic homestead ", and R.C.W. 26.16.030. 6. MaLLere which may be disclosed by a Search of the records against the name of the spouse of William Eric Robb, if married on or between July 21, 1998, and March 0, 1999. NOTE 1: The records of King County and /or our inspection indicate that the addreaa of the improvement located on said land is: 6550 South 154th Tukwila, Wamhington'98106. NOTE 2: Upon notification of cancellation, there will he a minimum cancellation Pee of $50.00 plus tax of $4,30. Title to Chic) property was examined by: Nanny Nash NM/ad/8939D END OP SCHEDULE H Any inquiries should be directed to one of the. title officer set forth in Schedule A. TO:425 251 8782 P.017 order No. 376647 z H Ce w J U. 00 co ca J H U IL 0 QQ 2 • d z = 1- 0 Z I- w U • a O- O F- w W I 0 u" Z • = O ~ z TAX LOT NO. 0003200018 That portion of W.H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East 65 feet; THENCE South 68° 00' 00" West 155.16 feet; THENCE North 22° 00' 00" West 127.54 feet to the South line of Tract 27 of said plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle; THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along said South line 143.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. TAX LOT NOS. 0003200019 and 0003200017: That portion of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40 in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89° 42' 00" East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East 178.00 feet, more or less, to the Northerly margin of Secondary State Highway No. 1 -L; THENCE Northeasterly along said Northerly margin to a point of intersection with the South line of said Tract 28; THENCE North 89° 47' 00" West along said South line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. INCLUDING the following described property: An easement for roadway and utilities 40 feet wide, being 20 feet in width on each side of the following described centerline: BEGINNING at a point on the South line of Tract 28 of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, which is South 89° 47' 00" East, 44.00 feet from the Southwest corner of said Tract 28; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East to an intersection with the Northerly margin of the Renton -Three Tree Point Road. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. EXCEPT the following described property: Project Name: Robb CPA & Rezone December 31, 2003 HMM/ath 107511.001.doc LEGAL DESCRIPTION z _IL; '~ w • n J U U O • 0 w= J f— � LL w 2 • d = W Z 1- I— O Z w • C) O O I— wW U'O W Z • = O ~ z COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along the South line of Tract 28, 66.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East, 152 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly margin of Secondary State Highway No. 1 -L; THENCE Northeasterly along said road margin 178.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the South line of said Tract 28; THENCE North 89° 47' 00" West along said line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Source: Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA commitment and King County Auditor's File Number 9307081653 (Warranty Deed). Project Name: Robb CPA & Rezone December 31, 2003 HMM /ath 107511.001.doc 01/13/2004 13:39 FAX 425 251 8782 BARGHAUSEN 11002 • Ms. Rebecca Fox iCity of Tukwila IDepartmcnt of Community Development 1 ,6300 Southcenter Boulevard., Suite 100 'Tukwila, WA 98188 i RE: Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code Amendment Application 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washington King County Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Our Job No. 10751 Dear Ms. Fox: a a e 3c,i-vvtatdcoR I, (a jacent land ownbh' , residing at County Parcel No ' l ,) hereby certify that I am the owner of King This Letter is intended to serve as evidence of my agreement with Mr. Eric Robb, conditioned on approval of rezone of his property, to cooperate in providing reciprocal access easements to resolve an access issue relating to the egress from the properties located at 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd_ We plan to connect this existing access point from Mr. Robb's property through my property to provide safe egress from both of our developments. This letter of intent is granted with the understanding that the exact configuration and improvements necessary to construct these access ways has yet to be determined. I certify that I ant the owner of the property referenced above and that 1 am authorized by any and all other owners of this property to provide this letter of intent. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct STATE OF WASHINGTON )- )) ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that l/�l 'atOi me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument act for the uses and purposes rnentiou d in this instrument. oA 5+ rV N Ry m. ' � ' �_ s % Dated: NC O. Sincerely, atial.kildhe person who appeared before and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary t 91 Notary Public in and for the Lt of ashiington My appointment expires: `_t ( 1 01 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcettter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly swom and upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 am the Current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owners real property, located at a a : • s . t, Tukwila, WA for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion • cancel the application without refund of fees. if the applicant does not respond to specific roquests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. SS (OM 243 -5626 residing 3 ' - L= r_,^ (Phone Number) C,--- 61J,e1,_ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington /AV( C. k}v/ My ean ex)tlrtm on ✓ /2 0 47 q+±tcYp«.xrearem,�.w Rr:CEPI r, DEC 3 1 ZUU3 ��rNUNI'fY DEVELOPMENT 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at 'T. / -•.( (city), (state), on 'c (Print Name) PO Box 88510, Tukwila, WA 98138 (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me ' ` ' ' IlZ c f' to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that jwe(she signed the same as bis /het voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 3 -IL -DAY OF "° `. c � ) uG 3 A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: LDR - Low Density Residential Proposed: 0 — Office B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: LDR - Low Density Residential Proposed: 0 — Office C. LAND USE(S): Existing: Office /Q.2,' %d -rt4 Proposed: Off ice / R ° ick e o ttj D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all directions from the property or area for which a change is proposed. Immediately surrounding the site the land uses are as follows: North - single family residential; vacant land West - office /commercial and single family residential South & East - Southecenter Bld. and I -405 interchange Between 500 and 1,000 feet from the site are the following: North - condominiums C: \homepage \tukwila \dcd \apps \COMPAPP.doc, 08 /17/00 (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) West - commercial /office and single family residential East - I -405 interchange, Green River and hotel /motel South - commercial retail and service station z i� w � QQ 2 JU 00 CO CI -J w • 0 2 _ • a � z = t- 0 z w • 0 O — o 1- w w _ f- 0 r- . Li_ .. z. w U 0 z CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplan®ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Robb Rezone LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. Tax Parcel no.s 0003200018, 0003200017 and 0003200019 Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: -4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consiillting Engineers, Inc.– Eric LaBrie /Harley Mattson Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 425 - 251 -6222 FAX: 425- 251 -8782 Signature: f 1fi tuariu C \ homepage \tukwila \dcd \appACOMPAPP.doc, 08/17/00 RECEIVED DEC 3 1 2003 CR IPI3ENSIVE PLAN/DYING CODE AMENDMENTS Date: 1451 1 b: • rrt;» rr•-7:nxro, u.a:«r, . z .J U O 0 a 0 i W LU _ W • 0 U- Q CO = I-W Z 1- 0 Z W W U � 0- WW t- H • O .. z W U O z FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P- CPA/P -ZCA Planner: File Number: / O'2 Application Complete (Date: ' ) Project File Number: ? v 3 _ 1 i 3 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: eci 3 -- U9.. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplan®ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Robb Rezone LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. Tax Parcel no.s 0003200018, 0003200017 and 0003200019 Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: -4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consiillting Engineers, Inc.– Eric LaBrie /Harley Mattson Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 425 - 251 -6222 FAX: 425- 251 -8782 Signature: f 1fi tuariu C \ homepage \tukwila \dcd \appACOMPAPP.doc, 08/17/00 RECEIVED DEC 3 1 2003 CR IPI3ENSIVE PLAN/DYING CODE AMENDMENTS Date: 1451 1 b: • rrt;» rr•-7:nxro, u.a:«r, . z .J U O 0 a 0 i W LU _ W • 0 U- Q CO = I-W Z 1- 0 Z W W U � 0- WW t- H • O .. z W U O z COMPREHENSIVE PLAN / ZONING CODE 8 AMENDMENT CRITERIA The burden of proof to demonstrate that a change to the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code is warranted lies solely upon the proponent. The greater the degree of change proposed, the greater will be the burden of showing that the change is justified. The Planning Commission and the City Council will review your proposal using the criteria listed below. It is essential that you describe in a clear and precise manner why the amendment request should be approved. Attach additional sheet(s) with your responses to each criterion. You may submit other documentation in support of your proposal. A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.80.050) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a re- designation of your property or a change in existing Plan policies: RECEIVED DEC 3 1 2003 COiviNILIra I Y DEVELOPMENT 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? The issue is addressed sufficiently in the Comprehensive Plan under the Southcenter Boulevard Goal (Goal No. 8.4): "A corridor of low -rise offices, residences, with localized commercial uses at major intersections, all of which act as a buffer to the Low Density Residential neighborhoods to the north." The subject property is located along Southcenter Boulevard, which is a principal arterial road, and at a major signalized intersection. The property is currently zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) and the requested Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment is proposing to change the subject property to Office (0). The requested amendment is in conformance with the Southcenter Boulevard Goal, in that it would allow for future office uses at the major intersection of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. These uses will act as a buffer to the LDR neighborhoods to the north. 2. Why is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The proposed change is the best means for meeting the identified public need for buffering between residential uses and the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor. The site is currently designated LDR, and is situated directly across from the intersection of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. Additionally, the property is bordered to the south and west by the Office Land Use and Zoning designations. By changing the current Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to Office, the subject property will better serve the Southcenter Boulevard Goal of buffering the residential land uses to the north from the Southcenter Boulevard corridor. Other options for meeting the public need are limited. 10751.004.doc z H z � w 6 U 00 J = H tu gQ = a 1- w Z 1-- 0 Z F— w U • D O - O I— ll! W ti O Z us = O ~' z B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.80.010) In addition to the above question, a response to each of the following circumstances is also necessary: 3. Why will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what type of benefit can be expected and why? The proposed change will result in a net benefit to the community by furthering the goals of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Corridor section. 1. A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use and the Zoning Maps by changing the designation of the subject property to the Office land use from the current LDR designation. The reason and rationale for this amendment request is based on the fact that the site is bordered by the Office designation to the south and west, and is directly adjacent to Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. With these characteristics in mind, the applicant wishes to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations to allow the property to be compatible with surrounding uses, and to help further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan for buffering residential uses to the north from the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor. 2. A statement of the anticipated impacts of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change; The anticipated impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment will be limited to the affected geographic area. Because there are existing Office land uses to the south and west of the site, there will be very little, if any, impacts to the surrounding neighborhoods, including the residential uses to the north. The Office use will help buffer the residential uses from the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor and will not significantly impact public services, surrounding land uses, or transportation in the immediate area. 3. An explanation of why the current Comprehensive Plan or Development Regulations are deficient or should not continue in effect; (be specific; cite policy numbers and code sections that apply!) The current Comprehensive Plan land use designation does not extend the Office use along Southcenter Boulevard to the major intersection at 68th Avenue South. The Southcenter Boulevard Goal (Goal No. 8.4) specifically states that: "The Southcenter Boulevard corridor should be a corridor of low -rise offices, residences, with localized commercial uses at major intersections, all of which act as a buffer to the Low Density Residential neighborhoods to the north." The current LDR designation does not further Goal No. 8.4 at this particular location, because it is 10751.004.doc immediately adjacent to the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor and is located at the 68th Avenue South intersection. z 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the = goals and specific requirements of the Growth Management Act; ii- w The proposed amendment will bring the subject property into conformance with -J 0 the Southcenter Boulevard Goal of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, which, in 0 0 itself, is in compliance with and promotes the goals and requirements of the cn w Growth Management Act. w i H co LL. 5. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable w O Countywide Planning Policies; g The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the Countywide Planning co d Policies that clearly delineate that the form and function of urban centers such as t_ _ Tukwila, will be determined at the local level. The proposed amendment will meet z 1-- the goals of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan and will, in turn, be in compliance z O with the Countywide Planning Policies. w D0 6. A statement of what changes, if any, would be required in functional plans (i.e., the UO co City's water, sewer, storm water or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment is 0 H adopted; = 0 The proposed amendment will not require any changes to the functional plans (i.e., — O the City's water, sewer, stormwater, or shoreline plans), because the site is a adequately served with public water, sanitary sewer, and transportation facilities. i v —, z The proposed amendment will not create a need for additional public services 0 beyond the existing services and facilities that are currently provided. 7. A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be needed to support the proposed change, and how the proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of the City; No capital improvements are necessary to support the proposed change. Therefore, it will not affect the City's capital facilities plan. 8. A statement of what other changes, if any, are required in other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the proposed change. No other changes to the City's plans or regulations will be necessary to implement the proposed change, other than the City's Zoning Map boundaries. 10751.004.doc C. ZONING AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.030) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a rezone of your property or a change in the existing Zoning Code. 1. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest; Upon approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the requested Zoning Map change will be in conformance with the new Comprehensive Plan designation. The public interest will be served by bringing the subject property into conformance with the Office Comprehensive Plan designation. 2. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding areas as set forth in the application form. No development activity is proposed. The existing structures will be left on -site. A separate application will be filed if future development plans are to be pursued for the subject property. At that time, an architectural site plan will be submitted for review as required and the future development will be evaluated for conformance with the surrounding areas and applicable requirements. 10751.004.doc Date: 12/23/0,3_ Applicant Name: Efic Robb c /ooBarghausen Consulting? ?Engineers, Inc. Street Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South City, State, Zip: Kent, WA 98032 Telephone: 425- 251 -6222 DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist f l City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Ltu� ^ yw.u4a''w'r:xSihtLarx,4' Hv4�:;.rr�= :s.....F<:�+:hnu tow J. K+.i.1:.aM'4 Ll1:Y��wu- .h1.M..ILWrM' �LS'k' DEC 31 11Ju, COMMUNIfl DEVELOP z _I- U CO C J = � W W cn = W Z � I— 0 Z I— W U � co 0 — CI I— W ua I u. 0 W z U I O ~ z 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. 14) Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances?. This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5 -0 . Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and sche duled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 z = z Ce w JO 00 O O cn w J w • 0 u_ Q = d H w Z = I- 0 Z ILI i n U O O 0 w w H p lU Z = O~ z 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 . Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 i Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle a I ' ropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answe r. Part B (continued) May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 3 z z rt w QQ � J U 00 co Ca Co w J = t— w 2 � Q I I -w z = F- 0 w ~ Lij U 0— 0 I— w Li. O ..z w U= 0 z 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 4 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This inchdes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Ple review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. v� mwva± + +°: .:Mra..ww��.N��. `: .ry+ vet °�.r,•...�w�^aer��x 5 d Part D (continued May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 40 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) 6 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Robb Rezone 2. Name of Applicant: Eric Robb 3. Date checklist prepared: December 31, 2003 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing if applicable): The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment applications are anticipated to be approved by the spring of 2004. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No future plans for additions, expansion, or further activity are connected with this proposal at this time. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No known environmental information has been or will be prepared that is directly related to this non - project action. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment applications by the City of Tukwila does not require any other permit approvals. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 1 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Agency Comments S xiSSv`tm�Liti: z iI- '~ w 00 0 J = N LL w 2 g ¢ . w Z = I- 1— 0 Z I— w c o O — a I— W W I ▪ H � .• W U O ~ z Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed land use action is a Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment. The applicant is proposing a change in the Land Use and Zoning Code Maps from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). The site is approximately 0.74 acres and is occupied by two, separate single - family residences. The applicant wishes to continue using the site for residential purposes after the Land Use and Zoning Maps are amended. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Site address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 23, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. The site is located on the northeast corner of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. See Figure 1— Vicinity Map, Figure 2 — Site Plan, and Appendix A — Legal Description. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? The site is located within the Class 3 Sensitive Areas region of the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Class 3 Areas are defined as "[areas] where landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 percent." G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP \ SEPAAPEDOC, 08/31/00 2 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth z a. General descri • tion of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous : moderatel slo ed 1- w UO co o J The site contains a portion of a steep slope in the southern areas of tax lots 17 and 19, and is relatively flat in the remaining areas of the subject property. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope onsite is approximately 40 percent, and is located at the approach of the existing access drive. w g = 1— w Z = t•- 1— O Z I— w U • � O N O I— W 2 u- O. .z (,) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate o z c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. g. vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No grading or filling activities are proposed. This is a non - project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? G: W'PHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Soils Survey lists this area as "Urban Land" (UR) soils. UR is soil that has been modified by disturbance of natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley, the fill ranges from approximately 3 feet to more than 12 feet in thickness and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Sensitive Areas Map lists this area as being an area where landslide potential is high. No clearing or construction activities are proposed. This is a non - project action. Use of the site will not change as a result of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment; therefore, erosion related to use of the site will be unlikely. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 3 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] rine Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Air h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 3. Water a. Surface: G: APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08131!00 This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. Off -site sources of emissions include surrounding residential and office land uses. These are not anticipated to affect this proposal. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River is located to the east and across Southcenter Boulevard from the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. This is a non - project action. No work is planned over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet of) the Green River. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. This is a non - project action. No fill or dredge activities are proposed. 4 10751.001.doc [HMM \tc z _I - '~ w C e Q p J U U 0 U o J H w � gQ co = a z = I— . I— O Z I— Lu • 0 U O N 0 I— w W 0 r_- u- w Z U 0 z Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. C. Ground: 1) 1) G:\ APPIIAN /LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. This is a non - project action. No surface water diversions or withdrawals are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM map, panel number 0959, the site is located outside of the 500 -year flood zone. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. This is a non - project action. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters are proposed. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. This is a non - project action. No groundwater withdrawals or discharges to groundwater are proposed. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of animals or humans he system(s) are expected to serve: This is a non - project action. The site is served with public water and sanitary sewer. No waste material discharges are proposed. Water Runoff (including storm water): Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 5 10751.001.doc [HMM \tcp] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? This is a non - project action. No vegetation removal or alterations are proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species present on the site. Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals: Fish: Other: GAAPPHAN /LANDUSE.APP SPA APP.DOC, 08(31100 Hawk, heron, eagle, ;songbirds', other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, salmo , trout, herring, shellfish, other: Rodents Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away. 6 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] z w 3 U U O co o J= t— w 0 2 gQ co = 0 Z H 0 Z I— w uj U O N O H w W OC t- -- UL --O .. Z w U = O ~ z Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ✓ Evergreen tree: E", cedar, pine, other ✓ Shrubs ✓ Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓ Other types of vegetation: typical residential landscaping Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? This is a non - project action. No vegetation removal or alterations are proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species present on the site. Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals: Fish: Other: GAAPPHAN /LANDUSE.APP SPA APP.DOC, 08(31100 Hawk, heron, eagle, ;songbirds', other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, salmo , trout, herring, shellfish, other: Rodents Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away. 6 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] z w 3 U U O co o J= t— w 0 2 gQ co = 0 Z H 0 Z I— w uj U O N O H w W OC t- -- UL --O .. Z w U = O ~ z Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. This is a non - project action. The existing structures utilize electricity for heating, lights, and typical appliances. No changes in energy consumption are anticipated. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. This is a non - project action. The existing structures are located above -grade from surrounding properties and are situated such that solar impacts are not associated with the site. No changes are proposed. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: G: W'PHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This is a non - project action. The existing use does not store or utilize toxic chemicals or hazardous substances; therefore, environmental health hazard risks will not occur as a result of this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency service that might be required. This is a non - project action. The existing use does not require special emergency services; therefore, no need for special emergency services will result from this proposal. 7 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a non - project action. The existing use does not create traffic, construction, operation, or other related noises; therefore, long -term and/or short-term noise is limited to very low volume automobile noise from occasional cars entering and exiting the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used for two, separate single - family residences. Uses surrounding the site are as follows: to the west is an office building, to the north is vacant residential land, to the south and across Southcenter Boulevard are commercial uses, to the east and across the Green River are commercial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site has not been historically used for agricultural purposes. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? GA APPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 Tax Lot 18 is occupied by a single - family residence constructed in 1957. It is a single- story, brick structure, and is centrally located on the lot. Tax Lot 19 is occupied by a single - family residence and a detached garage. Tax Lot 17 is vacant and is used for access and utilities. This is a non - project action. The existing structures will remain intact. 8 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? This site is currently zoned LDR — Low Density Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current Comprehensive Plan designation is LDR — Low Density Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is located within the Class 3 Sensitive Areas region of the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Class 3 Areas are defined as "[areas] where landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 percent." i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non - project action. No changes in residency are proposed. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? This is a non - project action. No persons would be displaced as a result of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31!00 The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment will help to further the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor goal by providing a buffer between Southcenter Boulevard and the LDR uses to the north. The Office land use will be compatible with properties located adjacent to the site. This is a non - project action. No residential units will be provided. 9 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. This is a non - project action. No housing will be eliminated. z c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: z w Et 2 This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 6 U O 10. Aesthetics w = J a. What is the tallest of any proposed structures(s), not including antennas; what co u.. is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? w 0 This is a non - project action. No structures are proposed. u_ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? _ z F— This is a non - project action. No views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or F- O obstructed. w • w c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 0 N o ff This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. = w U 11. Light and Glare -' 0 -- ..z w a) a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day U O ~ would it mainly occur? G MPPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 This is a non - project action; therefore, light or glare will not result from this proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 10 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] z Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The site is located within approximately a half -mile of Fort Dent Park and the Family Fun Center. See Figure 1— Vicinity Map. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. This is a non - project action; therefore, existing recreational uses will not be displaced as a result of this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation If evidence of historical, archaeological, scientific, or culturally significant objects are found, the State Historical Preservation Office will be notified. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. GA APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08!31/00 The site is accessed via a 40- foot -wide access and utilities easement off of Southcenter Boulevard, at the intersection of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. This is a non - project action; therefore, access to the site will remain as -is. See Figure 1— Vicinity Map and Figure 2 — Site Plan. 11 10751.001.doc [HMM \tcp] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not served with public transit. The nearest transit stop is located approximately '/a -mile to the west, at the Southcenter Boulevard and 62nd Avenue South service stop. z w c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many I J� v would the project eliminate? v O u) This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. The existing J = residential parking will not be eliminated as a result of this proposal. u� � w 0 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to 5 existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe u_ (indicate whether public or private). u> = � This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. z I— 0 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air I uj transportation? If so, generally describe. ? o 0 O — O 1- w f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed - v project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. u- O z This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. v 0 l — g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: z This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 15. Public Services Not anticipated. a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 None are proposed. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 12 1075 I.001.doc [HMM \tep) Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 'E G MPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31100 natural gas, (water{ (refuse service! 'telephone' (sanitary sewed, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. This is a non- project action. No new utilities or services are anticipated for this proposal. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). 13 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] z w w g _1 0 co CD III W F LL w 0 . 2 co =w 1• z I F- O Z I- W 2 o U O N O I•— = U . IL. 1 7 6 ..z O ~ z '.b •.z: .ar.1�i5 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? There are currently no plans for development - specific projects for this site. However, should there be a future development project, the project will implement stormwater management practices to ensure discharge of water does not increase as a result of the completed development. No significant impact to air and water or significant generation of noise are anticipated as a result of this proposal. Production, storage, and/or release of toxic or hazardous substances will not be associated with this proposal. Future development - specific projects will be subject to a separate environmental review. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Future development - specific projects would be required to include an on -site storm drainage system designed to collect stormwater runoff in accordance with applicable regulations, and the site would be developed in compliance with the City of Tukwila's development standards. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Future development - specific projects would result in vegetation removal in construction areas; however, landscaping would be provided as required by the applicable Tukwila Code requirements, and removal of existing vegetation will be addressed through the environmental review process for any future proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Future development - specific projects would be landscaped in accordance with applicable City of Tukwila code requirements. Future development activity would be addressed through the environmental review process. Appropriate measures to protect or conserve plants and animal habitat will be proposed at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The energy needs of future on -site development will not likely deplete energy or natural resources. Energy needs will be addressed through the environmental review process for that proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Future structures will be designed to comply with Energy Code requirements. G: AJ 'PHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 14 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Future development projects will be required to ensure that the on -site steep slopes would be protected with adequate setbacks. Impacts associated with future development projects will be subject to separate environmental review and will be addressed at that time. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Sensitive area buffers and setbacks will be provided in accordance with regulations in effect at the time of development of any future project proposals. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment will not allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. All future development will be comparable with the surrounding zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Future development projects will occur away from sensitive areas, to reduce or avoid impacts and will be consistent with the surrounding land uses in the Office zone. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? The Shoreline Master Plan will not be affected by the proposal because the site is not located within a Shoreline Master Plan area designation. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Future development projects will add to the demands on transportation and public services, and will be evaluated for associated impacts as required by regulations in effect at that time. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Future development project impacts would be subject to City of Tukwila development regulations, and would be subject to applicable mitigation measures in effect at that time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws for the protection of the environment. Future development will comply with regulations in effect at that time. GA APPHAN(LANDUSE.APPNSEPAAPP.DOC, 05131100 15 10751.001.doc [HMM \tcp] z `~ w 60 00 0 U w 1— � w w 0 � = • a • w zF- I— O Z W • o U O N O I— wW u' O w z U= P. z 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? The proposal will not conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. In fact, it will help further the goal of the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applicable. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NONPROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The proposal objective is to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning Map designations of the property to Office (0). 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternative means for accomplishing this objective. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? The proposal will not conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. In fact, it will help further the goal of the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applicable. G; WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 16 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] z _ ►- w Ce 00 c O w H U) w 12 Do I- 'um Z �. I- 0 z i- LLI 0 O co O — O I— w w. 1— �O iu 0~ z VICNITY MAP Ilk: 1 , ;fa •' ''•-•:,. ; ' ... .., .. - ..;.''.• • ...,-. 4.. : — • 4 4, ,,,. 11 1 I I ■■■ Job ...to 10751 1 „ 2 GHIA( 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-9782 FAX th, Votaftt..C. LAC P111.04. SURYN.G. t.H.401.4D04.4 torms —JAE <••■••• 41/21/02 Fon ERIC ROBB 6542 a 15T1-1 ST. TUKWILA, WA 98188 SITE PLAN FOR ROBB REZONE i qui li e ir.' i i 0 10 It 1. H t igii IN if li ; II corr.' 4i 11 IA i igli A ; 01 ti ii il q liZI C • , Aul P 1 124 1--4. i c l - l i anuel hyt ••-i lI pgr %./ • • '" - OIIAAAOUV - 1 84133 54.10. VS .:AA DA r.c. wows 51144 1 1.0150140, 5.010 T 0 alum 04 01 4 1 31 5 000) TA 413 01.0 55* .1 1410 , 100105 SEl 11.0 01 0.110 01 51084 1510. 3.l P TO 30100.1 w O 1W b eb, A. +0)041 5x111 M £11.1010010 a O..O.a. • 0031x00 3 0.n. 1304 3 0 S.. o . TV m - K1 - 100 0 01014 003011 P 110 051.04 1•41 A Slim 1001011 1 S1 .0:.10.1 10..30 00 1111 NI %MLA T.0 70.015.0 1/ 0 Om 3111.0. NI 11.0 00 a MI n. .ACS 4103 7.00)311 0'0]15-bl 31..35 • '1005 3513010 CM v v T0111 1030 13100 1311 111 0 10/530150 111 0 SalV nv 01034330 sn ,POOL A 014130 1511.01 anM Th TTO. S 1nn10Tp e N1V.1 5.003 Ny30100 1.5,41 li 0.1.90 .101:5 Oil i N3.0 a NI AAA.3 0011 S1Dn 01 1 0 QL00'b s 51 0 0105x}031011101 iv 7 20 -1.00 -010000 01 -000 -01(00 131 3131004 1111111 )0 10 LMn 10e.e 310 (1340 0 01 01 0311 34 01E 0 ,4'1- 11011311105/1 (130.0 1,004 010 .toil - 1 1101 (DW 0 0101) 0301 341131 • 4070 • 100* 150 113• .3000.3 1 71.} 130 OVA..)A 313E 1031 ow 36 on 0 M S 7ti 000.0 0 SU33 30.1190 l 13. 141. 1 1 0ar S. ...ALA ...ALA PO 3101 103100) 1311 150050 .p. LL.n 111 005 01 IPMO 101 5001315 0.0 • 'AMA 1011 a 01483.35010 On way SAT NI 0.110 7.. IOWA) ,110.33 105.41•4 14.0.0)1 On ANA: 501 13.130 a 10.42.01 31, w A 0031M541A41 535fO0 41 M01011 0 N 0 1Sy..I40 00ea £413403110 I) 1 M 140 0110910 On 3440 0)1 .01 411 1 350.1 x00 *N1 10.01.0 01305 3$ 1101330. ]1W 1O P. 1:07033 Srv S.SO ' NYA TO 4110.0.0.03 1 I 04010 0 3 4 La £5 3CV b TIN 21 40nrn 0:31 a4a 7101a'o � 11. AN,... A •••013011°:1.514. Ky..tx 1110 VAL .. l 5 t)A1. not, 0071113 bA S. am S✓. 3ta. 5 10103110. 084110) III) WORT • 0010139 01.01)001134010)015 0413 41005 400) 0135 A 01301114 A 10)031 411 . 3 1331033 1 003+ IE 7t TO v ....474E OM3v V WOO 133110 't A 5010130 V1EN1U16 Os 11033E 100120 )013.1513 L q sma. 000330 On 101 .1:naw al.. IOU( 003E A arms A Oa. 010 SO4. A Sr. '1 7...CA A 0)04 T.0 0 OK n M 11 NI 1304 X1111 ill 01 11313010011151100.101000OK /It a11 sv E Dm. .1153.0.044 '.10 1 011ST 10101 1151 '15.1.51 7r 0035 0184 001 M 10 101 M A 010* 07 1 . M 10131.G.100,0 :.0843110.. SnE A 01 15110.. w 000301 APN1 100 w a 20 1 E) Ilion 01 00 1001.1.1. 0 3010)1 30 A 1 17.001 A IN. ..1KSwn 3/.x1333 110w.n MO 0341. t b 4. w 52 0A � 'VI was 0.0. 0310011 1400030)5 A 00140314 531011 S,50A3,013 (41) 5014000533 30331 1013 A 11.E 3*00 A 41301111, 11.0)5 100! 3111 IIMt-•301b w A IP..n .>rwlaw 0311 l m Pwl 0K x a .14m lri u5aw 3101 .00 000001 00)01 .10 1 ibt NI NUM � YnR L 0 10141.OU.w It lOtAM05 NI 0100 .10 h..AA 701 1)010 5 x3010.3115111n101 x.01� 111)OC OnA' 1111PS110.m On 11RX 10) 31000 .w (l1) S 131071 1403.•11 A 1310'71. A 1>.00. 03005 7314010 1100 N1 a 033 5400.1 30* 011115 OK PE. 110 11 LI 4005 01111 Mu. 01 M.O. x1013010. 03113 AIi LIM A M WILT 0)101 Kitt 11..03 al %AS 11 001 w 413.1 .00 K OS DINT IAA it CM OK A M W105 1(1'140'1 IS.I at 0 030 17.1 00305,1 7..3 0101 0 IG 1004 10 4 101 00 11110 w It 10 01051 * L 13 00) 11) IN 3 11404 1/ tit 51 5I. 03 8431.0.. • 44001 x00 5111. 9010 . rt..�3 02 .15001 it 10110E A M MO 1.1.0010)10 N. A.0191 ml (il) Y 1331M40 A3AElf1S OIHdVI D0d01 1VI.LHVd GNV AEIVCNf108 101110530 10031 1000041 51531103 30 050 00 .4i 03:1103a 55557119 330001543 1301 Sn l APO 00 00)004. 24.05 t 1190.1) 37.150 006 0 16 1.0 AtID LKEP.. 410 .84 n 30 „10,1 A Main 10311=l.pS TRIM t 1 .- ' rams t s - •� l 40)3031 Eve 3 ° 33 0 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Int I V tri N 1:10d 3SfKIIV1 NOIDNIHSVM *V1VANIU. WM - 3 BOWS N CZ c*SNMO.L NO1133S O VA 3S 341. NOUNCkl V ffNOZaN' &SOU NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • • -. • ..." '• 6 cn S 152nd St S 152nd. Fl 0 14)4 . , l ivrk. 0 x 44 AO■ 4 <1. Q &N BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SOURCE: MAPQUEST.COM.INC. SITE fr FIGURE 1 560the-entOr nt 4 'CP c TrIX k Dr 4,,_ Ny ..e 1 02002 MapQuest.corn. Inc.: 02002 Navigation Teohnobgies 1 VICINITY MAP 0 I —7200m, '600ft NORTH ROBB REZONE (BCE#10751) Tukwila, Washington 0011.10 0 Iel ;uap{SaH A ;ISUaa Nun Hal suot ;eu6Isea 6uiuoZ soon 6uluoZ asaismans ACpadoid sano ;uo0 ;ooj Z aolj0 o; lel ;ueplsaa Ausuaa Mol PM8 Ja ;ua34;nog Zt►S9 '8 OSS9 ;uawpuawy apo3 6uluoZ 890.201 ;uawpuawd ueld anlsuageIdwo3 L90 ;uawdoIanaa A ;lunwwoa ;o ;uawpedaa ei !nn)nl ;o /CU3 jfi pua6a, j t in n rt I I LI I LI Idol NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. G4'.0 • m ,f �x ota GAO BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SOURCE: DigiAir AERIAL PHOTO NORTH RoBB REZONE (BC E#10751) Tukwila, Washington File: L03 -0079 35mm Drawing #1 Z re W: J U 00: W =. V„! W O g W H=: ZF.. F- O zt- ? p'. 2 V: W E:: V u); 0 z or- 1' -50' •" F ! ' t } N✓' ' '' w. SITE PLAN ROBB REZONE A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E, W M. TUKVILA WASHINGTON . .. kk f "‘Y1 " 1 1 I 1 I + ` I:iil �r1 rt. i4 \ 'I{ i!if f 1 t l r ` t, ! ( , „ 1 I • i • ; r ylr,;, t, . 1 1 1 , ...... : t T t a t) � AE FLOOD ZONE X VICINRY MAP NOTES I. CONTOURS BASED ON COY OF MOM CIS DATA 2. WE IS SERVED 9Y PUBLIC INTER Mq SNORT SERER (TU KW41 1MNER t SERER DISISICTS). 3. ALL ONSRE VEOETAIION TO RD/A14 UNDISTURBED. NO DENICCIIENT ACINIIY PROPOSED. 4. SRE R WITHIN GOY OF RRMRA COINREIIFNSNE PUN CLASS 3 SENSITIVE AREA (50I1.5). 5. FLOOD ZONE AE - BASE F1.000 ELEVATIONS DETERMINED FOOD ZONE R - AREAS OF 500 YEAR FL000; AREAS OF 10 YEAR FLOOD WHIN AVENGE DEPTHS OF LESS TNN i FOOT OR WTM °war AREAS LESS TRW 1 SWIPE MILE: MILT AREAS . PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 100 VW FLOOD* • SOURCE: FEW FIRM IILP PANE]. 959 NUMBER 570091. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SHOWN f O O a $11 I N I • r-I I I Iy C['I'I..i 1. ITI'I�I;i l .,I nch': Y '. �~ . I • Q: 9TTYra 6 v'� :: erg Z I wa • in iIii i lliiilll0 .1111iluti111011ILIlhljIl