Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L02-067 - ROBB WILLIAM ERIC - REZONE
L02 067 • BARG HAUSEN/ROBB 6550 & 6542 154 STREET COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO: File FROM: REBECCA FOX SUBJ: Eric Robb Comprehensive Land Use Plan Comprehensive Plan / Rezone Request Zoning Code Amendment L02 -067 Office @ 6550 & 6542 S. 154th Please refer to file L03 -079, Mr. Robb's subsequent request for "Office" designation. Mr. Robb withdrew this application. Please note that regardless of whether or not he requests a comp plan change & rezone, Mr. Robb is supposed to get a boundary line adjustment to address the encroachment of his building onto his north neighbor's property. (Parcel encroached upon- - #3597000520...Owner in 2003: Michael Alhadeff) Eric Robb 6550 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 October 28, 2003 Enc. Cc Eric Labrie Brian Shelton Jack Pace Kathy Stetson City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Comprehensive Plan/Rezone Request at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Dear Mr Robb: I am returning the enclosed letter from Gerald Schneider regarding his agreement with you in developing reciprocal access easements. In rejecting your request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone earlier this year, the Tukwila City Council stated that you will need to submit a new application before your request for a rezone and Comprehensive Plan Map change can be reconsidered. Access easements and property line encroachment issues must be fully resolved prior to your submitting the application. Along with the new application, you will need to provide complete documentation showing how these issues have been resolved. For your convenience, I have included an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone. Please note that this application must be returned to the City of Tukwila no later than December 31, 2003 in order for the request to be considered in 2004. As we discussed, there will be no charge for the new application. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 if you have any questions. Sincerely, G.c�. P X Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 - 3665 z w re 2 6 J U 0 y0 cnw J H CO u w H 0 S w w o o w z o � z Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment Application 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washington King County Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Our Job No. 10751 Dear Ms. Fox: orl � � c Nco/ I, (a land ownel•9' , residing at wAliyC , hereby certify that I am the owner of King County Parcel No / This letter is intended to serve as evidence of my agreement with Mr. Eric Robb, conditioned on approval of rezone of his property, to cooperate in providing reciprocal access easements to resolve an access issue relating to the egress from the properties located at 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd. We plan to connect this existing access point from Mr. Robb's property through my property to provide safe egress from both of our developments. This letter of intent is granted with the understanding that the exact configuration and improvements necessary to construct these access ways has yet to be determined. I certify that I am the owner of the property referenced above and that I am authorized by any and all other owners of this property to provide this letter of intent. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: Sincerely, STATE OF WASHINGTON -ss COUNTY OF KING ) (� (y , ,� n I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Il�YU � �C i � ,the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. 2 003 06 L Notary Public in and for the state of Washington My appointment expires: 4 ( j I I Di Z W 6 0 0 w W g a rn = F- _ Z �. I- O Z • w C) O ( D I- W u• O W Z . U U) h•= 0 Z u o V ∎� _ 0 . < 'NG ENGtt Sksp , 4 " . 8 September 2, 2003 04, 4 4 003 z FACSIMILE: (206) 431 -3665 F<oit ux ix 2 _ . JU U O U) o CO w ,, J I— W O J ' u- < d I W . F— I Z I— I— O Z I— no 'O = Pursuant to our prior discussions, our client Eric Robb, has requested to defer his Comprehensive Plan H amendment and Rezone request to next year's docket in order to resolve issues that were raised during i v : this years review. It is our understanding that you need this request in written form in order to allow us H. this opportunity. If you need anything further, please contact me immediately. z tit Sincerely, oq H_, f f / e '' '' d' Cl°2.° e Eric G. LaBrie, AICP Senior Planner Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98i88 RE: Dear Ms. Fox: Robb Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone Request 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washington City of Tukwila File Nos. E02 -024, L02 -067, and L02 -068 Our Job No. 10751 EGL; pj 1075 lc.008.doc cc: Mr. Eric Robb Ms. Harley Mattson, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA 0 WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 2, 2003, beginning at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, Washington, to consider the following: An ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan map and policies, and zoning map. The proposed amendments are as follows: 1) Allow new office developments in the Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy zone as Conditional Uses if smaller than 100,000 square feet and if not adjacent to the Duwamish River north of the turning basin; 2) Approve amendment to revise Sensitive Areas policies per Washington Growth Management Act requirements; 3) Rezone /Comprehensive Plan change at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard from Low - Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). All interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on this issue. Those unable to attend in person may submit written testimony to the City Clerk's office until 5:00 PM on the day of the hearing. Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. The City strives to accommodate people with disabilities; reasonable accommodations are available at the Public Hearing with advance notice. This notice is also available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (206)4334800 or TDD (206)248 -2933 if we can be of assistance. Dated this 1 day of ( 66- ( , 2003. Published: Seattle Times, August 15, 2003 e E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk City of Tukwila vary ..xrS17.r'" m• . 4?nt+.sr- ?"r,,w..�.+...,';.+a<� s( �7;�G!*w's'c� S+S �!f' +�ht'Y�wyiru'^ir; :t :t!w.w �»..7_ City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Eric Robb/Barghausen Consulting Engineers has filed an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan (File #L02 -067) and Zoning Code (File #L02 -068) maps at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. The existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation is Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant is requesting a rezone and Comprehensive Plan map amendment to Office (0). The Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing to give residents and businesses an opportunity to express their opinions and give testimony about the proposal: Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2003 Time: 7 p.m. Place: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner of the Tukwila Depai tment of Community Development at 206 - 431 - 3683. Written comments are welcome. Please address comments to Rebecca Fox, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 or via e - mail to rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us. If desired, written comments may also be presented in person at the City Council meeting on September 2, 2003. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 h e ■ LDR MDR i 153 St . > 111111% 9 1 a HEIR R 0 0003200019 N 0003200017 0003200018 I n t r Si va Tukwila Blvd ti TUC N\yi RCM Legend Zoning Designations A Subject Properties TUC GIS Tukwila LDR Low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential HDR High Density Residential TUG Tukwila Urban Center RCM Regional Commercial Mixed Use 0 Office c;) City of Tukwila Department of Community Development L02 -067 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proposed) L02 -068 Zoning Code Amendment (Proposed) 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd Request Low Density Residential to Office NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. c) An existing office development established prior to 12/11/1995 (the effective date of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan) may be allowed to exceed the maximum size limitations and/or convert to a stand -alone office use subject to obtaining Conditional Use approval. a Based on the direction by the Planning Commission, staff has prepared the attached 6 draft ordinance for the City Council's consideration. 00 CO 0 II. L02 -064 Comprehensive Plan amendment Revise Sensitive Areas policies L02 -064 Zoning Code amendment Revise Sensitive Areas policies w w 0 Request: 2 Approve "placeholder" amendment for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to g include "best available science," other issues per State of Washington Growth Management Act requirements. w Planning Commission recommendation: F- 0 Defer consideration until 2003-2004 Growth Management Act update w w Ill. L02 -067 Rezone LDR to 0 (Barghausen/Robb) o cn L02 -068 Comprehensive Plan amendment LDR to 0 (Barghausen /Robb) 0 w w = - U Request: F= Approve rezone /Comprehensive Plan change at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter z Boulevard from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) U o � Planning Commission recommendation: Deny request. Applicant may reapply for consideration if access and encroachment issues are resolved before 12/31/03. Next steps: The amendments will return before the City Council for a final public hearing on September 2, 2003. After the hearing, the City Council will make their decision. At that point, the City Council may: • Adopt an amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission; • Adopt a modified version of an amendment; or • Reject the amendment. Consideration of these amendments is a legislative action, not quasi-judicial. Reminder: Please remember to bring the Comprehensive Plan Amendment binder that was distributed in March, 2003. C) cp CD C z Present: Joan Hernandez, Chair; Joe Duffle, Jim Haggerton Steve Lancaster, Nick Olivas, Rhonda Berry, Bruce Fletcher, Minnie Dhaliwal, Lucy Lauterbach; Shaunta Hyde- Boeing Company 1. Comp Plan Amendments The Council held a public hearing on three proposed comp plan amendments last March. The issues then went to the Planning Commission, which held a public hearing on them. The first issue regards possible office zoning for the Heavy Manufacturing and Industrial zone (MIC/H) in the north of the City. The ECO Northwest report had looked at this issue of saving industrial land or using it for more readily available commercial uses such as office. They concluded it is uncertain what future industrial uses will need the land, but that it is increasingly rare, and Tukwila's position close to Seattle and the ports makes it valuable as industrial land. Shaunta said Boeing owns land north of the turning basin, which is at about 103` Street. The Planning Commission recommended that land on the river north of the turning basin not allow stand -alone offices, as industrial uses there could ship industrial products out on the river. Shaunta expressed concern that Boeing's offices could become non - conforming, as they are on the river north of S. 103 She asked that the entire MIC/H area be allowed to have conditional use offices. Though they only own 2% of the lots, Boeing owns 25% of the land area in that north area. They would lose flexibility if their offices attached to manufacturing buildings on the river could not be stand -alone offices. In talking about what kinds of future uses could need MIC/H land, Steve said computer companies which have big generators make a lot of noise, and could sited in industrially zoned land. The second amendment was a placeholder in case the City had time to do an update to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance, but the update won't be done this year, so the issue can be deferred to 2004. The third amendment was a request for a rezone of the area just east of City Hall at the T -line bridge. The owners have requested rezoning from low density residential to office zoning. The committee talked about access to the properties, and agreed with staff that it was too difficult to allow more than residential use until better access can be obtained. Recommend amendments to COW. 2. Second Quarter Reports The Committee asked about Cascade Park's schedule. Bruce said it should be seeded this month. Public Works will put sidewalks in on the half - street on 37 this month also. Also, the house at the northwest corner has been purchased and will be demolished. On Codiga Farm, the Army Corps is going through some changes in their Chief Administrator, which could be why park development is going slowly with them. They claim the bank is too steep for a boat ramp. The barn has been taken down. The issue of using people convicted of non - violent crimes, to work out their fines by picking up trash and other community service work is being pursued by Judge Walden through using King County to supervise. On Community Development, the committee asked about code enforcement. Steve said there are some culture clashes in Tukwila between those who've lived a certain more rural way for a long time who are willing to put up with some junk cars or other code enforcement issues, and others who like yards and houses neat, clean, and trim. The City walks a fine line, trying to address the more flagrant violations, but not all the smaller minor violations. Joe heard CN reports from the community that one car that has been repeatedly tagged for too -long parking violations merely erases the police messages on his window each time he gets them. Joan asked about G development below Fosterview, and was told it is an 8 -9 home short plat. Finally, Steve reported that Sound Transit may be locating its track through some of the property east of S. 51' at I -5. Information. Committee chair approval Community and Parks Committee August 12, 2002 Attachment 1 A CALL TO ORDER /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers — City Hall September 2, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Mayor Steve Mullet called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Jane Cantu, City Clerk, called the roll of Council. Present were Councilmembers Joe Duffle, Joan Hernandez, Jim Haggerton, Pamela Linder, Dave Fenton and Richard Simpson. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO EXCUSE THE ABSENCE OF COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAM CARTER. The motion carried 6 - 0. OFFICIALS: Steve King, City Attorney; Lucy Lauterbach, Council Analyst; Jane Cantu, City Clerk; Jim Morrow, Public Works Director; Steve Lancaster, Community Development Director; and Bruce Fletcher, Parks and Recreation Director. PROCLAMATIONS /APPOINTMENTS Appointments to Boards and Commissions 1. Community Oriented Policing Citizens' Advisory Board Terry Williams Position #7 Term expires March 31, 2004 Don Lincoln, Police Lieutenant, introduced Mr. Williams, a new resident to the City. Interested in obtaining a Private Investigator's license, Mr. Williams believes this to be a professional "fit" for the Board. HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO APPOINT TERRY WILLIAMS TO THE COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING CITIZENS' ADVISORY BOARD, POSITION #7, WITH A TERM TO EXPIRE MARCH 31, 2004. The motion carried 6 - 2. Human Services Advisory Board Elda Mercado Position #4 Term expires April 30, 2004 Evelyn Boykan, Human Services Manager, introduced Ms. Mercado, a 12 -year resident of the City. Fluent in both English and Spanish and having 18 years' experience with non - profit agencies, Ms. Mercado is turning her focus more specifically to her own community. HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO APPOINT ELDA MERCADO TO THE HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD, POSITION #4, WITH A TERM TO EXPIRE APRIL 30, 2004. The motion carried 6 - 0. CITIZEN COMMENT /CORRESPONDENCE: None. City of Tukwila City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes — August 18, 2003 (Regular) b. Approval of Vouchers — 301282- 301540, in the amount of $1,251,708.21 c. Intra - Project Funds Transfer — Foster Clubhouse Improvement Project DUFFIE MOVED; HERNANDEZ SECONDED; APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED.* w CC Uj Discussion: While reviewing vouchers, Ms. Hernandez saw one for $8,455.60 payable to James Codiga, for beauty bark. Ms. Hernandez needed affirmation that this is an issue separate from recent property 0 0 purchase transactions with Mr. Codiga. Mayor Mullet confirmed the same. 0 rn J = * The motion carried 6 -0. co u. w PUBLIC HEARING: g D Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, including a AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, W AMENDING THE CITY'S 1995 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND z F = AMENDING TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS TO ALLOW LIMITED OFFICE USE IN THE MIC/H ZONE; AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1865 AND 1758 AS CODIFIED IN TMC Z O SECTION 18.38.040; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE W uj DATE Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development, noted this evening's public hearing is on the o ' subject of proposed comprehensive plan amendments for 2003. Those proposed amendments have been w w reviewed (first) by the City Council, (second) the Planning Commission, and are now returning to the full v Council, with recommendations from the Planning Commission. u. 0 w z U= 1. A comprehensive plan and Zoning Code amendment to allow office use as Stand Alone Uses in z the MIC /H designation of the Duwamish Corridor. 2. Revisions to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance policies in order to bring them into compliance with "best available science" requirements of State law. 3. A rezone from Low Density Residential to Office for property located at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. Three proposed amendments for 2003 include: Once public testimony is considered, Council may approve amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, make modifications to the recommendations, reject the proposed amendments or defer the amendments until a subsequent year for consideration. 7:18 p.m. Mayor Mullet opened the public hearing. Addressing proposed amendment number 1, Mr. Lancaster relayed that under the current Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code designation, Office uses are allowed in the MIC /H area only when they are supportive of manufacturing or other permitted uses in that district. The proposal which came forward allows stand -alone office as its own use in this area. The Planning Commission recommends support of the proposed amendment, subject to a conditional use permit, with a maximum size of 100,000 gross square feet in floor area, per lot, legally established on the effective date of the ordinance, or before. No I i new offices shall be allowed on Tots that abut the Duwamish River, and are north of the Turning Basin. Any existing office development (established prior to the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan [19951) shall be allowed to exceed the 100,000 gross square foot maximum, and become legal conforming uses through the conditional use permit process. �e+: mt +Pya Page 2 of 6 City of Tukwila Page 3 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 Shaunta Hyde, Manager, Government Relations, Boeing, P. O. Box 3707, MC 14 - 49, Seattle, WA, 98124 read a letter into the record on behalf of her employer. Said letter speaks in support of the Planning Commission's recommendations, yet seeks to include "all property in the Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC). Several existing office buildings could become non - conforming uses if shoreline properties are carved out of the zoning reform as suggested by the Planning Commission." Additionally, Ms. Hyde brought one of Boeing's Strategic Planners and one of their Development Managers for the Tukwila Corridor should questions arise from the Council. Councilmember Linder stated her understanding that dredging the river would be difficult and expensive. She asked if the Army Corps of Engineers would grant a permit for it. John Powers, Warren Realty, same address as Ms. Hyde, stated one of the biggest problems with dredging the river is the Army Corps of Engineers currently takes 7 to 10 years to obtain required permits. This includes studies and related issues. As it relates to proposed amendment #2, Mr. Lancaster relayed the Planning Commission recommends deferring consideration of the item until 2004. Staffing levels and current workloads do not allow for appropriate amounts of review, study and /or work necessary. No citizen comments were received on this issue. As it relates to proposed amendment #3, Mr. Lancaster described this proposal as being brought forth by the property owner for property located at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. The request seeks to amend zoning from Low Density Residential to Office. Review of the proposal brought about complications and problems, with two primary issues being discrepancies related to property boundaries and access limitations to the property. If denied, the applicant intends to reapply if complications are resolved. The Planning Commission recommends denial of this proposal. City staff received a letter today from a representative of the applicant. A copy of the letter was provided to Council. The letter, addressed to Rebecca Fox, was penned by Eric LaBrie, AICP, Senior Planner, with Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and notified Ms. Fox that the applicant (Eric Robb) has requested deferral of his proposed amendment until 2004 "in order to resolve issues that were raised during this year's "review." If Council approves deferral, it means the applicant would not have to reapply. Staff will gather new information and the item would be "carried into next year's program automatically." If Council denies the deferral, the applicant is forced to submit a reapplication and pay a reapplication fee of approximately $1,000.00. Anna Bernhard, 14241 — 59 Avenue South, Tukwila, when reviewing the site recently, called it an "insane plan to have people working in that building and coming down that steep little driveway." She hopes the applicant can figure other ways to enter the site. 7:37 p.m. Mayor Mullet closed the public hearing. COUNCIL DELIBERATION: Councilmember Duffle spoke in favor of denying proposed amendment #3. Councilmembers Hernandez, Haggerton, Linder, Fenton and Simpson all concurred. Ms. Hernandez asked if Ms. Carter would be able to vote on other items if she was absent during the public hearing. Councilmember Linder was in favor of waiting until Ms. Carter returned. Ms. Hernandez was comfortable with taking action on proposed amendments #2 and #3 and deferring action on proposed amendment #1. DUFFIE MOVED; LINDER SECONDED; DENIAL OF L02 - 067 AND L02 - 068. The motion carried 6 -0. I�X!'.M'tl,T},T• '^ vS.-, �.'•. �. s. �• �T�. �1:'. F'.+.. t''-: �• yw +�....- �.�':5.�..z�i.L..•.,.�v. ��• w�— Y.1:. �.'. .�+�n�Y•s^.1Mli�2yY,*S.'P0.a1 ^'S V.M`!YXf.`.1 City of Tukwila Page 4 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 HERNANDEZ MOVED; HAGGERTON SECONDED; DEFERRING ACTION ON L02 - 064 AND L02- 065. The motion carried 6 - 0. HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO LEAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO CONSIDER ITEMS L02 -062 AND L02 -063 ON SEPTMEBER 15, 2003. The motion carried 6 - z UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ~ w a. Sewer Utility Rates 6 JU 1. Proposed resolution amending Public Works Fee Schedule C) o u) ill A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, W I ADOPTING A PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004. 0 I- W O Jim Morrow, Director of Public Works, reminded Council of staff's request to raise the existing sewer 2 rates. Using a single - family residence as an example, Mr. Morrow noted the City currently charges ga $28.40 per month. The proposed rate is $2.00 higher per month, thus $30.40. u) I. a Mr. Morrow then reviewed the Public Works Fee Schedule with the $2.00 increase, set for an effective I-- _ date of January 1, 2004. Sewer rates have not been increased since 1996 in Tukwila and current fees z F are significantly lower than the average of neighboring jurisdictions. z O w Discussion took place between Council and Mr. Morrow. Clarification, where necessary, was provided. D o Cl) FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO HAVE THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION READ BY TITLE 0 I— ww I I— P Steve King, City Attorney, read the title of the proposed resolution. u- z HAGGERTON MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AS `IC') PRESENTED. The motion carried 6 -0. p F z APPROVED RESOLUTION #1531 ONLY. The motion carried 6 -0. 2. Proposed ordinance amending permit & inspection fees, and rates for sewer services and penalties AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TMC CHAPTER 14.12, RELATING TO PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES; AMENDING TMC CHAPTER 14.16, RELATING TO THE RATES FOR SEWER SERVICE AND PENALTY CHARGES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 936 AND 1776; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Jim Morrow reviewed the proposed ordinance with Council and noted the ordinance would go into effect beginning January 1, 2004. The bills, however, will not change until the 1s of February, 2004 as meters will be read in January. That is the intent of the language within the proposed ordinance. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO HAVE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE READ BY TITLE ONLY. The motion carried 6 -0. Steve King, City Attorney, read the title of the proposed ordinance. DUFFIE MOVED; HERNANDEZ SECONDED; TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED.* City of Tukwila Page 5 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 John Crull, Boeing Company, P. O. Box 3707 — MC7X - 71, Seattle, Washington, asked whether Section 4 of the proposed ordinance is a newly proposed addition to the ordinance or has it always existed. Mr. Morrow responded Section 4 removes reference to "the flat rate." Shaunta Hyde, Boeing Company, P. O. Box 3707 — MC14 - 49, Seattle, Washington, acknowledged current budget issues facing the City, yet requested future proposed utility or sewer increases be mailed to businesses letting them know directly. Councilmember Hernandez noted continued availability of reduced rates for Senior Citizens who apply for such reduction. *The motion carried 6 -0. APPROVED ORDINANCE #2026 b. Aquatics Facilities Operation Technician Bruce Fletcher, Director, Parks and Recreation, reported review of this item by two Council Committees and the Council Committee of Whole. He requested Council grant permission to increase the current 1/2- time position of Facilities Operation Technician (Tukwila Pool Operator) be increased to full time. Revenues are currently exceeding expectations and continued revenue receipts should meet funding of the position. HERNANDEZ MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO INCREASE THE FACILITIES OPERATION TECHNICIAN POSITION FROM .5 FTE TO FULL TIME. The motion carried 6 - REPORTS: a. Mayor Mayor Mullet introduced Mr. Fletcher who reported on happenings at Crestview Park. Mr. Fletcher noted Curt Treadwell, a neighbor to the park, has been disturbed (recently) with watchdogs and other things that bother him in light of the fact he works an odd schedule. In a voicemail (today) to Mr. Fletcher, Mr. Treadwell stated his dissatisfaction with park users, the need for moving of a picnic shelter, moving of a play structure and his desire to move a couple trees so that his satellite TV dish is not obstructed. Mr. Treadwell intended to "go over" Mr. Fletcher's head to meet with Police Chief Haines and Mayor Mullet to bring some resolve to these issues, not to mention more signage, changing of park hours, removal of basketball hoops, and other similarly related issues. Mr. Fletcher suggests referral of the issues to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee for review as Mr. Treadwell is unhappy with Mr. Fletcher and decisions he makes. Mayor Mullet spoke to Mr. Treadwell and they discussed costs necessary to fix the problems as well as the potential for adjusting park hours. Ultimately, however, Council must make decisions on requests being brought forward. • This item was discussed amongst Councilmembers and then to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee for consideration. b. City Council Councilmember Duffle enjoyed a recent swim at the City of Tukwila Pool. Additionally, Mr. Duffle and Ms. Lauterbach had a recent opportunity to meet with Muhammed Accord (a Somali leader). They spoke of issues regarding the number of Somali population within Tukwila schools and the potential need for a full -time interpreter on staff. Dr. Michael Silver suggested to Mr. Duffle that the need truly does not exist for a full -time interpreter. t City of Tukwila Page 6 of 6 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2003 Mr. Duffle reported on today's Finance and Safety Committee meeting. There, a recommendation was formulated (for consideration by Council) to hold the annual Council retreat within the Tukwila City limits. This was done in order to set an example as it relates to budget cuts and constraints within City government. Councilmembers Fenton and Hernandez supported that recommendation verbally. Finally, Mr. Duffle reminded all present that Tukwila Schools opened today and to be mindful of the children on and near the roads. z Councilmember Hernandez attended the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting on August = w 26, 2003 and today's Tukwila Business and Government Affairs meeting. o: 2 J U Councilmember Haggerton had no report. 0 cn 0 CD W Councilmember Linder had no report. J �. N LL. Councilmember Fenton had no report. w 0 Councilmember Simpson attended the recent Highway 99 Action Committee clean -up effort. g • w z �. I- O z i— w U • 0 'O 92 O 1.= : W • w r - - 0 w Z cz • y O c. City Staff: Rhonda Berry was absent. d. Legislative Analyst Lucy Lauterbach reminded Council of the September 16, 5:30 p.m., budget review meeting. e. City Attorney Steve King had no report. ADJOURN: 8:30 p.m. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING. The motion carried 6 -0. kitty \ 1V\ YV\ cALCT Date Minutes Signed: September 15, 2003. - _.4.. -d./ .� Steven M. Mullet, Mayor ,7 ) Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM Date: August 27, 2003 TO: Tukwila City Council FROM: Steve Lancaster, Department of Community Development SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR 2003 Background On August 25, 2003, the Council was briefed on the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding the three proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments that were submitted for consideration during the 2002 -2003 annual amendment process. I. L02 -062 Comprehensive Plan amendment--Office in MIC/H L02 -063 Zoning Code Amendment — Office. in MIC/H The Council asked staff to provide some additional information regarding the proposed amendment to allow office in the MIC/H zone. The Council asked for the following: 1. Are there any examples of existing water dependent industrial uses in the Duwamish corridor? Delta Marine is a water related industry located on the Duwamish River and they manufacture boats and yachts. It is located at 1608 South 96 Street, Seattle on the west side of the River. Jorgensen Steel located at 8431 East Marginal Way South, Tukwila uses the River for transportation of some of their materials by barges. 2. What are the regulatory/environmental issues with the redevelopment of these properties for water dependent uses? Any development within 200 feet of the shoreline is subject to shoreline substantial development permit. At this time the area north of the turning basin is subject to King County Shoreline Master Program that is administered by the City of Tukwila. The setbacks for non -water related uses(commercial and industrial) Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 are 50 feet from the ordinary high water mark or twenty feet from edge of the floodway, whichever is greater. There are provisions to reduce this setback if the development provides public access. However water dependent industrial use is not required to maintain a shoreline setback. If the redevelopment of any of the parcels includes any work in, over or under navigable waters of the United States a permit is required from the US Army Corps of Engineers to ensure that navigation is not adversely affected. Typically shoreline stabilization methods that have least impact on habitat to properly serve the water dependent uses are required. Following is a summary of the Planning Commission's Recommendation: Planning Commission recommended the following: 1. Allow new office developments in the MIC/H zone as Conditional Uses and subject to the following restrictions: a) The maximum size of new office developments shall not exceed 100,000 square feet of gross floor area per lot that was legally established prior to mm/dd/yy (the effective date of the adoption of the ordinance). b) No new offices shall be allowed on lots that abut the Duwamish River and are north of the turning basin. The parcels that are ineligible for stand -alone office uses are shown on the map attached to the ordinance. 2. An existing office development established prior to 12/11/1995 (the effective date of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan) may be allowed to exceed the maximum size limitations and/or convert to a stand -alone office use subject to obtaining Conditional Use approval. Also, attached is the draft ordinance for the public hearing. IL L02 -064 Comprehensive Plan amendment — Revise Sensitive Areas policies L02 -064 Zoning Code amendment — Revise Sensitive Areas policies Request: Approve "placeholder" amendment for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to include "best available science," other issues per State of Washington Growth Management Act requirements. Planning Commission recommendation: Defer consideration until 2003-2004 Growth Management Act update III. L02 -067 Rezone LDR to 0 (Barghausen/Robb) L02 -068 Comprehensive Plan amendment LDR to 0 (Barghausen/Robb) Request: Approve rezone /Comprehensive Plan change at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) Planning Commission recommendation: Deny request. Applicant may reapply for consideration if access and encroachment issues are resolved before 12/31/03. Next steps: The Committee of the Whole will hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments on September 2, 2003. After the public hearing, the City Council may: • Adopt an amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission; • Adopt a modified version of an amendment; • Reject the amendment; or • Ask for additional information prior to making a final decision on the request. MEMORANDUM August 19, 2003 City of f Tukwlla Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Tukwila City Council FROM: Steve Lancaster, Department of Community Development SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR 2003 Background Three proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments were submitted for consideration in the 2003 -2003 annual amendment process. The City Council held a public meeting on the amendments on March 17, 2003 and forwarded them to the Planning Commission for consideration. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendments on June 26, 2003. One amendment was carried over to July 24, 2003, and considered at that time. The Community Affairs and Parks Committee discussed the amendments on 8/12/03 and forwarded the amendments to the City Council for a briefing and public hearing. The requested amendments and the Planning Commission recommendations are the following: 1. L02 -062 Comprehensive Plan amendment — Office in MIC/H L02 -063 Zoning Code Amendment —Office in MIC/H Request: The Council asked staff to study the changing shape of industry, the viability of industrial retention and the market for office uses in the MIC/H area to decide whether office should be allowed as a stand -alone use in the MIC/H zone. Planning Commission Recommendation: Planning Commission recommended the following: Allow new office developments in the MIC/H zone as Conditional Uses and subject to the following restrictions: a) The maximum size of new office developments shall not exceed 100,000 Square feet of gross floor area per lot that was legally established priof to mm/dd/yy (the effective date of the adoption of the ordinance). b) No new offices shall be allowed on lots that abut the Duwamish River and North of the turning basin. The parcels that are ineligible for stand -alone office uses are shown on the map attached to the ordinance iteL100 ._,, -Tukut Wastlingtot698188 • Rhqu; 2, 0 6-431-3670 Fax. 206- 4313665 HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director FILE NUMBER: -• APPLICANT: - STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION June 26, 2003 Notice mailed to surrounding properties, June 12, 2003 Notice published in the Seattle Times, June 13, 2003 Site posted, June 19, 2003 -L02}067 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) L02 -Q68 (Rezone) Eric RobbBarghausen Consulting Engineers REQUEST: Change Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) LOCATION: 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard (Tax Parcel #s 0003200017, 0003200018, 0003200019) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) ZONE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - significance (DNS) Rebecca Fox A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application B. Aerial photo C. Zoning Map with 2' Contours D. Zoning Map E. Sensitive Areas Map NI F. Site Survey G. Memo from Brian Shelton, 6/6/03 V H. Traffic Impact Analysis (Revised 6/6/03) with letter and e-mail from David Schwegel Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 4111111/>: Ric {MIA 1 4:k 1111117 '11161"'"f L02 -067, L02 -0G8 Robb Rezo. PA FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The applicant Eric Robb proposes to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map designations at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard (S. 154 St.), Tukwila from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). Vicinity /Site Information The affected properties include three individual tax lots with a combined area of approximately .74 acres. Two separate single- family residences face Southcenter Boulevard and sit well above the roadway. One single - family residence occupies Tax Lot #003200018 (6542 Southcenter Boulevard/6542 S. 154 St.) and the other residence is located on Tax Lot #003200019 (6550 Southcenter Boulevard /6550 S. 154 St.). The two houses share q, steep gravel (Tax Lot#003200017) which provides the only access to Southcenter Boulevard. A third house, located at 6532 Southcenter Boulevard, but no Mnpluded in the request, also uses the driveway to enter and leave the property. In its Traffic Impact Analysis, Barghausen Consulting Engineers states that the driveway grade is approximately 12% based on visual observation, and by comparison to S. 178 Street. However, measurements taken from the site survey which Barghausen prepared show that the driveway is approximately 22.5% grade. For purposes of the applicant's proposal, the driveway grade must be determined by field survey and not visual checking. Located in a 40' access and utility easement owned by the State of Washington Department of Transportation, the existing driveway is approximately 12 to 13' wide with a masonry wall flanking either side to a width of approximately 25'. The steep driveway more or less bisects the two residential properties. It lacks the 2 to 3% landing approaching the sidewalk and intersection, which is typically needed for commercial purposes. A survey requested by the City of Tukwila shows that portions of the building and retaining wall at 6550 Southcenter Boulevard (on Tax Lot #003200019) encroach from approximately 12 to 20 feet onto the adjacent lot to the north (Attachment E —Robb Site Survey) The site contains steep slopes. The Sensitive Areas Overlay shows that over 50% of the site is located within a Class 3 area of potential geologic instability. ( See Attachment D— Sensitive Areas Map) Class 3 areas are those where "landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 percent." 2 L02 -067, L02 -068 Robb Rezo. _PA DISCUSSION The City Council held a public meeting on this issue on March 17, 2003 and forwarded it to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. Traffic, circulation and site access are primary concerns in considering redesignating this site from Low Density Residential to Office. Although no specific development is proposed at this time, the City of Tukwila requested that the applicant prepare a traffic study (Attachment H) to give a general idea of the potential impacts of office development on the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis compared the effects of office, medical/dental and retail, and selected a medical /dental use for analysis, since its projected average parking need was the highest of the three uses. The Traffic Impact Analysis considers a 9,000 square foot facility, which requires 37 parking spaces .. Tukwila's Zoning Code requires a minimum of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of usable space, for a minimum of 27 spaces. The Traffic Impact Analysis suggested that parking could be provided by terraced areas with stairways, but does not take into account the steep and unstable slopes which over much of the site. No allowance was made for on- site circulation or 14nd5caping. Siillt lines are deficient. Surrounding Users.- Land uses immediately adjacent to the site are: North — Single family residential; wooded vacant land South — Southcenter Boulevard and I -405 Interchange East — Southcenter Boulevard and I -405 Interchange West —Office /commercial; park; single - family residential Land uses between 500 and 1,000 feet from the site include the following: North— Condominiums South — Commercial retail and service station East —I -405 Interchange, Green River, hotel/motel West — Commercial office, single - family residential REVIEW CRITERIA Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear compliance with the criteria that follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? The Comprehensive Plan's highest priority objective is the following: "To improve and sustain residential neighborhood quality and livability." 3 L02 -067, L02 -068 Robb Rezoi. PA Transportation Corridor Goal 8.4 (Southcenter Boulevard) calls for "A corridor of low rise offices, residences, with localized commercial uses at major intersections all of which act as a buffer to the low- density residential neighborhoods to the north." 2) Impacts The requested a map change would remove three lots from the Low Density Residential (LDR) designation and add them to the Office (0) designation/zone. This would permit the Office (0) to run continuously along Southcenter Boulevard to the I -405 Interchange. No development is proposed at this time; any future office projects would require demolishing two existing single - family units. If the property is redesignated to 0, more intensive future development would generate additional traffic and noise. City Engineer Brian Shelton states that the steep driveway would need improvement to support future development, since the driveway is barely adequate for the existing residential uses. Sight distance is inadequate for exiting the property. In addition, with wet or- icy pavement, vehicles will have difficulty entering or leaving the property. Leaving the site is especially difficult, since a vehicle which cannot stop would be hazardous to pedestrians or vehicles along Southcenter Boulevard (Memo, June 6, 2003). These factors woad be especially problematic given increased traffic volumes producekby, office development. 3) Is the proposed change, the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The Comprehensive Plan identifies the Southcenter Boulevard corridor as a buffer for low density residential neighborhoods to the north. The housing currently located on the site already functions as a buffer since it sits significantly above the roadway, and is somewhat removed from the single - family neighborhood to the north. A retaining wall along Southcenter Boulevard separates the property from the roadway More intensive development at this site is problematic since site conditions include steep, unstable slopes and steep access. It is not clear that there is an identified public need for the proposed change since there are numerous developed sites in Tukwila which already permit office /retail/medical uses and do not have similar access limitations. 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what result can be expected and why? Existing housing could remain until replaced with office development. The property lies in an area with high potential for geologic instability, so any construction would require extra care. Site conditions make it difficult to accommodate more intensive development. Once built, any office use will generate additional traffic which would enter and exit the property from Southcenter Boulevard via the very steep driveway. In his memo of June 6, 2003, City Engineer Brian Shelton finds that the driveway, with its limited sight angles and steep grade, is barely acceptable for the current residential use. The memo further states that any new intensified use will require a revision to the property access for safety purposes. The Traffic Report suggests the possibility of using the developed Schneider Family Home property easement connecting to the parking lot located at 6510 4 L02 -067, L02 -068 Robb Rezc. .,PA Southcenter Boulevard as an alternative access to the proposed Robb development if written permission were obtained from the Schneider Family Home development owners. In August, 2002, the Tukwila City Council approved the vacation of Macadam Road from Southcenter Boulevard to Old Bluff Street pertaining to this property. This vacation becomes final if conditions are met by September 30, 2003; otherwise it will expire. It isn't clear that conditions have changed to require additional office zoning at this time. CONCLUSIONS These conclusions are based on four Review Criteria: 1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not ' adequately addressed, is there a need for it? The issue is adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Office uses are already located along Southcenter Boulevard. 2) Impacts If the property is redesignated to Office, more intensive future development would generate additional traffic and noise. Added traffic would need to use the steep driveway which is barely adegi}dte for current residential use. Sight distance is limited. Wet or icy conditions would make it especially difficult to enter or exit the property. These factors would be worsened with increased traffic volumes made possible by a future office development. 3) Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need. What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The site currently provides a buffer between Southcenter Boulevard and housing to the north since it sits high above the roadway. Since there are other locations in Tukwila that allow office use, it is not clear that this site, with its encroachment issues, steep, unstable slopes and difficult access, is needed for office at this time. 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what result can be expected and why? The properties' development potential for residential or office use will be limited by site considerations including: • Relatively small site size, • steep slopes, • potential geological instability and • safety concerns relating to the difficult access to and from Southcenter Boulevard. The Traffic Impact Study suggests that it might be possible to mitigate the driveway problems by developing alternate access via the adjacent Schneider Homes property once the City right -of -way is vacated. However, other locations without these concerns are already available for office use in Tukwila. 5 L02 -067, L02 -068 Robb Reza. .:PA RECOMMENDATION Given the property's encroachment issues, site development constraints including steep slopes and difficult access, and the availability of office use in other zones, staff recommends denial of the applicant's request at this time. If the applicant: 1) resolves property encroachment issues, and 2) develops a feasible alternative access plan by December 31, 2003, the City will consider the request as part of the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code update in 2004. Property encroachment and setback issues must be resolved by December 31, 2003 whether or not the applicant decides to resubmit the application. All development plans must undergo applicable environmental, design and building permit review, and obtain appropriate permits. During its consideration, the Planning Commission could: • Recommend approval; " - - - • Modify the proposal; • Recommend denial. After the Planning Commission review, the proposed amendment will be brought before the City Council for a public hearing and final decision. 6 ui'�•.FOii;•so:'ac„«+�a::z3..� 7�;:+i:4.�K,„':av�$;c+ i NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOP ENT: Robb Rezone • ' • Signature: t,v..r C: \homepage \tukwila \dcd \ apps \COMPAPP.doc, 06 /17/00 '`■\ Tax Parcel no.s 0003200018, 0003200017 and 0003200019 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 4 Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 425- 251 -6222 FAX: 425 -251 -8782 ATTACHMENT A RECEIVED DEC 31 2002 CITY OF TUKWILA COMMUN1lT i1 COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Develo r -- �PMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 PLAN/ZONING CODE Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Eric LaBrie /Harley Mattson Date: 12.-1 3 0/0 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P- CPA/P -ZCA Planner: g _ X File Number: L 02, - O 6 (6 p/4-) ; LO z - 0 6 e Application Complete (Date: ) 117.. 3 103 Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: E 0 2 - 0 2 Lt NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOP ENT: Robb Rezone • ' • Signature: t,v..r C: \homepage \tukwila \dcd \ apps \COMPAPP.doc, 06 /17/00 '`■\ Tax Parcel no.s 0003200018, 0003200017 and 0003200019 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 4 Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 425- 251 -6222 FAX: 425 -251 -8782 ATTACHMENT A RECEIVED DEC 31 2002 CITY OF TUKWILA COMMUN1lT i1 COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Develo r -- �PMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 PLAN/ZONING CODE Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Eric LaBrie /Harley Mattson Date: 12.-1 3 0/0 Proposed: 0 — Office C. LAND USE(S): Existing: Of fice Proposed: Office A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: S'y 3 °' !•w Existing: LDR - Low Density Residential B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: LDR - Low Density Residential Proposed: 0 - Office North - condominiums C : \homepage \tukwila \dcd \apps \COMPAPP.doc, 08/17/00 . (for proposed changes in land use,designations or rezones) D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUTRROUNDING LAND USES: Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all directions from the property or change is proposed. Immediately surrounding the site the land uses are as North - single family residential; vacant land West - office /commercial and single family residential South & East - Southecenter Bld, and I -405 interchange West - commercial /office and single family residential East - I -405 interchange, Green River and hotel /motel South - commercial retail and service station area for which a follows: Between 500 and 1,000 feet from the site are the following: O r 0 I t o o �— m r m 3 s� 0 a A p m O �b I ON''0N 3 vi ti ca ' U1 t • = 3 rz m am o ato N O en co * SANV gotg ttttwAAAA 5 9 4 mNO, Ca m � O o • S n 2 1 . X30 0�mA Oooa99 O n m a • ' m 7 ATTACHMENT B Z • � J U U u) J H LL WO ti. d W Z = H H n D Z H U O - O H W H • p W Z U= O ~ Z ;uowpuowv (990 -Z07) BupuoZ pun (L90-Z07) unid omsuogaudwoo ggoa NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Tukwila Blvd Zoning Designations GIs Tukwila 1 " =.5 Mile LDR Low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential HDR High Density Residential TUC Tukwila Urban Center RCM Regional Commercial Mixed Use 0 Office Subject Properties City of Tukwila Department of Community Development L02 -067 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proposed) L02 -068 Zoning Code Amendment (Proposed) 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd Request Low Density Residential to Office NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. lov I 23• 6 o '• •f 4MpwM ■ l•AC„p,r34f 2 M ,�t� otpv.� 3 • ,�gag^YW: ATTACHMENT E TYPE 3 SLOPES = Dark Grey z w a!� -2 U 00 (0 cold W f-' U- W L? � = W I- _ Z I- F- O W I-- O • - � H WW I— H u" z U= O ~ z 000081 ,•.1 010∎1110 fl mat /0111/0000 x 1•10 >• 001 roan 1000 M 0 - 10 1 Okla use 0.1111 0.1111 $00 II 100 010 M eer alY 010 awe la 60 M w 000 Os dew 010 • 9-am. 01001001 100®e 1111117 • nwwa m VW 1003 Of WORM 1. Ma •111 -0 0 • 000 700. 000 r w MONK 111aawlfaa9l 106 w m ma was swat wawa 1M • •aaMwn new f f • am M am Ina WM TN Ml • a WNW la 1 m a ammoVll w mm a Jaal• C 000100l>•9lf 101 1 r r Iowa maws Iwwomla'OiMI 7011 moan. awe as 1 [awoa rod awl vma 0a10 r 0310 SCSI r 51 500 10 Ca ami 5 WWWM w a 010•110_111 1 all- . Mlrt{O�SW 1.._idpml ss sa r 111011 �w r • 4fa I ISCd I 1 Wei II ItS • i-IS I • lied a ]sew I 1 - Ines M i 1w 1011 1 1,1114 a Oa= r 110 110.11. a Kral a 35100_ a 1•01111 It 01001110 1113 r tN 71 11 0a rt5_ et00 al sa O r L9a5 w lases 111111 160 / ales. a a law l0lw Ti fa.sflW Ass 1:1011 OMS as 1 w n_I a WM . I S 01060 ,0 la s11ow1 011117010al OK 000 01100 May M 0000.1000 llraA wawa ra 110.111, C0 M SO 001 fa me atall a i 10 10.111, M a Ian= we In sa r Mat all an Or ocal L 0 M VU OM Mar MI r.1..y w mr WM . awamart._ are..5sea Mari aM 0I1 W.0 M Ma a WM. WOW, an a* Waal • al WI 11 maw awe 702 IN 1000 1001 11 a 0 NANO Tar •001 aCw r WI 1 low ma 0110 la s r a MIW 1 1100 10 111 1 sera 1111 mac m sr an ww111. wawa all a tat at - 000 WSC wain a wse 1oa Ira a 10000aa /3160 a 1310 • Mal a M a ■0011 vaa■ 1104 slow 1 mow... Let SC • ma 1010101 1 sea/® aa11a 70.110.0 a =MIM • leaml WI ewe sIw R91 ma. 00 a ai=w wM l 7.1a a NI, f1 M r 111 a 1a_I as la s lb fat 1 not aM a WI ale x r. l•ma• Mr lCl w 1101 Lw Ml raw OM a 110010.001 ]100 11-1 ar_7 .111020•1 r 1wI e1 �aa 11160135 M Y 101 also a Id 110 a Mal Da at a 111 mat 3111 1M a s WO 3:11.1 Wawa as W • 1 aM WV a r 1ROa . mama 1113 en M r wraa wawa r oar manila a sal Mat Or a EKG wsaa11la 1 @t1 10•0100 00 r■ Ifs 1a t frtaro R ow= SI ma 0 1 11017:111171012111•01 11 1 01 • M a oar M (II) IOIUIP.IOI xln sum %swu S wawa a Lot taw a um) la ■le.. 991 ICI Ma al lwa M a maw aamx a omlw sea al ma a x real oat M a>•aw. Cam Sawa M call ml S I sw a a waaf ow taros lrm was 16 1.0 r 7010 • 1011 1 G91 a XI W.. III sera aC Klm arty rand fl a a laI S awe • an so W. au new am /was w waawr (RI) i n7YN taaa. a fit 1601 a arm M ■WNW TMO a Ma) tail 1601 WaaY 0 a N u alf a a Da JAM Mao Mr m Mal ma a n um. alt I a a MS n.t 1 a Sal a O r an a al 06 00 air 1Cwa a r Mfrfl 1Y1I 101 a a MU =ft 1MSww YMm we v1 aw Ulla M WUa a g a am M 5® el oe 710110 0l rl Waal. M a= oKs Oa_ on w /31160 wend Ol1d'Wawa 71060 10 ■ Vale. I Zw 1901 W sew. 10.01110/1 oam •110 a roI ar (Il) a 6010, 1CIUI1003 inn A3AHf1S OIHdYHOOd01 ldllaYd ONd AaVaNf109 at I. A as 5I III O0 A M R !1111101 m411e1, 021111101 Slfllwl/ DNlfla 11011 (�Q 0 CI 7101/111 sell Wm. 1{ N1 • 351111 wn M011 11• wawa we maul (ski rU w Slit VMS IYmy Wt 0w Dalai 011110C NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR 'THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ON3031 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMO Rebecca Fox, Dept. of Community Development Brian Shelton, City Engineer June 6, 2003 Robb Rezone This response to the Robb Rezone traffic study is provided to reflect final comments to all information being submitted. The existing conditions involve three single family residential lots being jointly served by a very steep, narrow driveway that accesses Southcenter Boulevard, a very busy, high traffic volume arterial street. The applicants proposal involves three lots that include the driveway and two residences. The property is sloped moderate to steep with elevation differential of approximately fifty feet and is separated from and above the street by a retaining wall several feet in height. The steep driveway more or less bisects the properties and does not include a landing of 2 -3% approaching the sidewalk and intersection which is typically needed for commercial type access. The existing driveway is approximately 22.5% grade according to Barghausen survey. The report indicates the driveway &rade is approximately 12% based on visual observation and comparison to South 178` Street. For the purposes of the applicant's proposal, driveway grade must be determined by field survey and not visual comparison. The entering sight distance is 88 feet for vehicles leaving the site and making free right turns on red traffic signal indication. The traffic study is based on a proposal to develop a facility of 9,000 square feet with parking need of 37 spaces on property totalling 31,926 square feet. This translates to a proportion of building to lot area of 28 percent and does not include any consideration for parking or landscaping. The proposal would generate 325 average weekday trips and 33 peak hour trips. The study included slight mention of occasional truck traffic on rare occasion and did not indicate truck size or type. The study indicates a need for 37 parking spaces which would be provided by terraced parking areas with stairways. Also, alternative access to and from the properties may be possible to 65 Avenue to the west. ATTACHMENT G The existing conditions are not desireable for any access to an arterial. The low volume traffic generated by the existing uses is allowed to continue based on grandfathering. Any new intensified use will require a revision to the property access for safety purposes. z The existing driveway is too steep and unsafe, at 12% or 22.5 %, for a use more intense than existing. Considering local weather conditions that involve wet or icy pavement, Ix vehicles, including trucks, will have extreme difficulty ingressing, egressing or D negotiating the driveway. Egressing the site is particularly problematic for a vehicle that v Q. cannot stop prior to the sidewalk thereby becoming a hazard for pedestrians or vehicles in co the street. The entering sight distance is deficient by 237 feet according to the study; _ ~ required distance of 325 feet minus measured distance of 88 feet, which indicates that • N u.. this location will have significantly' increased accident rate. w o � Q The traffic study pointed out possible mitigations for the sight distance deficiency most of which are extremely costly earthwork or retaining wall construction. Signage for turn = a restrictions is not a basis for mitigating a sight distance safety hazard as a part of original z F design. The steep driveway is potentially mitigated through alternative access. Based F- O upon the various existing property characteristics involving driveway grade, sight w distance, and parking requirements the rezone request should be denied or deferred 2_ D. contingent upon the applicant securing acceptable, alternative access. o 0 O F- w I ,..w O Ll.l H I . O +Y: 'r�'L'�::i '• r. ..• �'�i` '�i \ �itv.a,A;:i�:.'I1L�l l: iyil+' + �: +�:4�i� •.• x._.S:n..L. 5�,.:.:.'.J1_. �S�Yi_x i.' Jlilbt !yiii�i'.aiV.vhS�L:d`Std'r. "<• �� � .�•�e:' iyw;:, Ms. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Fox: • 3F Access Alternatives. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING. SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES June 6, 2003 ATTACHMENT H Y" t•"1 �.. a . 4 JU1':; 0 2003 2 9 11/ Pinjj1 TV RE: Robb Rezone Development at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Revised Traffic Impact Analysis per your May 28, 2003 letter and follow -up discussions Our Job No. 10751 Thank you for reviewing and commenting on our Robb Rezone Traffic Impact Analysis dated April 22, 2003. We have revised the Robb Rezone Traffic Impact Analysis based on your May 28, 2003. comment letter and follow up discussions. Enclosed please find the Robb Rezone Traffic Impact Analysis dated June 6, 2003 for your review and approval. The following outline provides each of your comments in italics exactly as written on your May 28, 2003 comment letter, along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed. Please provide the following previously requested information per the letter dated March 27, 2003 (enclosed) as follows: • IA. b &d, topography and driveway(s) location and grade for existing land use. Response: Existing grade is estimated at 12 percent as indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Sections 3 and 9. • 3E Driveway design; width (25 feet minimum), throat length, grade, throat length. Response: As indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Sections 3 and 9, the existing grade is estimated at 12 percent and the existing driveway is 25 feet wide. The existing driveway is depicted in the Appendix E photographs. Response: As indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Sections 3 and 9 and depicted in the Appendix E photographs, while the only proposed access would be at the Southcenter Blvd/66 Avenue South intersection, a potential access may be available to connect with the Schneider Family Homes parking lot to the south provided written permission, in the form of an easement, is obtained from the owners. O 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (4251 251.6222 14251251.8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA. WA • WALNUT CRE =K. CA barahausen com ; :"'�'L,,, k f „ 'MR, � T""arnrrr�u ., . . ^h Ms. Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner City of Tukwila 1 • 3G2. On -Sire Circulation. -2- June 6, 2003 Response: As indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Sections 1, 9, and 10, alternatives for avoiding ingressing vehicles slowing traffic while negotiating a 12 percent grade include (a) a row parking lot on the lower level and the building on the upper level connected by stairs, (b) row parking lots on two lower levels with the building on a third upper level, all connected by stairs, and (c) an extra wide on -site access roadway to accommodate parallel parking on both sides and leading up to a row parking lot adjacent to the building. 00 0 w w J = F- U) The report needs to provide additional information and discussion addressing existing w O conditions and proposed changes regarding vehicular ingress and egress including: g • Trucks co a w t- z � I- 0 z t-. uj w • Alternative access to the property (from the west, for example). 2 o U 0- 0 I- wW � L.L. O w Z (1) OH z Response: Passenger cars and occasional light trucks are expected to use the facility. A few occasional larger delivery vehicles may be expected on rare occasions. Response; As indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Sections 1, 9, and 10, and depicted on the Appendix E photographs, access from the Schneider Family Homes parking lot to the west may be possible provided that written permission, in the form of au easement, is obtained from the owners. • Ability to Provide Parking. Response: As indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Sections 1, 9, and 10, Parking Generation predicts a low parking demand of 20 spaces and an average demand of 37 spaces. Due to the project site's location adjacent to major transit lines running along Southcenter Blvd., and the site's close proximity to transit stops, the parking demand would likely be closer to the low end. Alternatives for providing parking include (a) a row parking lot on, the lower level with the building on the upper level, (b) parking on two lower levels with the building on the top level and (c) an extra wide access to accommodate parallel parking and leading up to an upper level row parking lot adjacent to building also located on the upper level. • • On -Site Circulation. Response: Layout alternatives that would not require ingressing vehicles to ascend a 12 percent grade or egressing vehicles to descend the same 12 percent grade (ascending and descending the grade may impact 66 Avenue South and Southcenter Boalevard traffic) include (a) parking on the lower level only with stairs leading to the upper building, (b) parking on two lower levels and the building on the third. (higher) level all connected by stairs, a curved and extra wide access roadway with parallel parking on both sales leading up to a row parking lot adjacent to the building (on the same level as the parking lot). Berm excavation and retaining wall reconstruction are alternatives for improving sight distance as indicated in. Traffic Impact Analysis Section 5.6 as well as for enhancing on -site circulation. "J.'?A"h!id''1 ";. t'. aT�: 9?' �hNew L7th�y+ xnro•. wv. �.�...,r.v:.m- rw«.z.w.v.>cm� cm. ..v a � �w �.? w._.. u. �.-. L: l— o:. w:...—... �..::..—..-- �. ........�'.....:..;...a..... vt.++ n c?Ve+. � r .� M .'�'•..4`� ! _''b.'.�. �` z =1- w ce 6 JU 9 Ms. Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner City of Tukwila -3- June 6, 2003 Figure 5 should be revised to include site - related traffic volumes at Intersection E. Response: As discussed with the City of Tukwila, the counts conducted in 2002 (site land use has not changed since then) show no vehicles entering or exiting the site during the PM peak hour. As indicated in the Traffic Impact Analysis Section 6.2, if additional traffic were added to these movements up to the maximum level expected by the highest potential trip generating land use on site, the Level of Service "C" rating would not change and the overall intersection average delay would increase by no more than 0.5 seconds. Finally the sight distance analysis should include evaluation based on 85 percentile. Response: It was not practical to conduct a speed study at this location. Therefore, as indicated in Traffic Impact Analysis Section 5.6, and as discussed with the City of Tukwila, a 40 -mile- per -hour design speed (posted speed plus five miles per hour) was used for analysis purposes based on a driver's eye set 10 feet back from Southcenter Boulevard. This distance would be reduced for 18 feet back from Southcenter Boulevard. Sight Distance enhancement alternatives as discussed in the Traffic Impact Analysis include berm excavation and retaining wall reconstruction. Safety enhancements include "No Right on Red" and "Watch for Pedestrians" signage. We believe the above responses, together with the enclosed revised Traffic Impact Analysis dated June 6, 2003, address all of the comments in your letter dated May 28, 2003. Questions may be directed to me via telephone at (425) 656 -7424, facsimile at (425) 251 -8782, or e-mail at dschwegel @barghausen.com. Thank you. Respectfully, DMS /ath 5587c.022.doc enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Brian Shelton, City of Tukwila (w /enc.) Mr. Eric Robb (w /enc.) Mr. Eric LaBrie, Barghausen Consulting Engineers Ms. Harley Mattson, Barghausen Consulting Engineers 00c,..,=4 4 . David M. Schwegel Transportation Engineer z � r w QQ JU U co o CO LU J w � = � Z = 1- O Z ~ w U � co O 1- W • W LL O w z U c O 1- z PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MINUTES JUNE 26, 2003 The Public Hearing was called to order by Chair Whisler at 7:00 PM. Attachment 3 a Present: Chair, Kirstine Whisler, Vice Chair, George Malina, Commissioners: Vern Meryhew, Bill Arthur, and Henry Marvin. Excused Absence: Margaret Bratcher and Allan Ekberg Representing City Staff: Steve Lancaster, Rebecca Fox, Minnie Dhaliwal, and Wynetta Bivens. GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE WORKSESSION MINUTES FROM MAY 22, 2003. VERN MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES FROM MAY 22, 2003. VERN MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. CASE NUMBER: L03 -002 APPLICANT: Stephen B. Meadows for Nextel Communications (withdrawn by the applicant — to be re- scheduled at a later date) Rebecca Fox gave a brief overview with some background on the three proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendments. CASE NUMBERS: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L02 -062, L02 -063 City of Tukwila Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to allow office uses in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (M/IC -H) zones. All M/IC -H zones citywide, Tukwila, WA Minnie Dhaliwal gave the presentation for staff. Staff recommended a combination of option B (1) and B (4) B. Modify the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code 1. Allow some office use but limit the size to 100,000 sq. $. and list it as a conditional use to address traffic © mitigation. No change is required to the County Wide Planning Policies. It will require Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. Allow all existing office development to continue to be used for office use. This would allow offices that are currently accessory to other permitted uses to be used as stand alone offices. Existing office buildings associated with manufacturing uses and exceeding 100,000 sq. ft. could be allowed to convert to stand alone office uses subject to a Conditional Use permit. Shaunta Hyde, from the Boeing Company gave testimony in support of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Amendments. The Boeing Company agrees with staff's recommendation as they represent a good balance for the future. • • Ms. Hyde also answered questions. O 4. Minnie Dhaliwal and Steve Lancaster answered several additional questions for the Commission. Staff will provide the Planning Commission with the current price value for the industrial zone lands vs. the office zone land. The Planning Commission asked staff to take a look at the possibility of preserving the area along side of the river where there is .W7EZA The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Attachment 2 Public Testimony provided to the Tukwila Community Affairs and Park Committee re: L -02 -062 Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Office in MIC/H and L -02 -063 Zoning Code Amendment — Office in MIC/H August 12, 2003 z Distinguished Committee Members: z w Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you this evening. v 00 u) o W co u- w = w F- _ zF- zI- W w U 0 �_ o t- W W � U u- w z U= O ~ \ • As you know, the Boeing Company came before you earlier this year, outlining i.t support of the staff member recommendations on this comprehensive plan amendment which outlined allowing development of some stand alone office use in the MIC/H Zone but to limit the size to 100,000 square feet and list it as a conditional use to address traffic mitigation. • The staff further recommended allowing all existing office development to be converted to stand alone office use. This would allow offices that are accessory to other currently.permitted uses to be used as stand alone offices if future circumstances warrant such a conversion. Existing office buildings associated with currently permitted uses and exceeding 100,000 square feet could be allowed to convert to stand alorie uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit. • When the issue was reviewed before your Planning Commission they agreed with the staff's recommendations;\ ut felt it necessary to carve out all property that bordered the river to preserve 'the opportunity for a future industrial owner to the river for manufacturing or water'dependent purposes. • While we still agree with the Planning Commission on the zoning and comprehensive plan recommendations, we would ask that you include all property in the Manufacturing Industrial Center,(MIC). Several existing office buildings could become non- conforming uses if shoreline properties are carved out of the zoning reform as suggested by the Planning Commission. • The staff recommendations are based on theact that several corridor properties have been vacant for years and on the City's report prepared by EcoNorthwest addressing the issue of whether the city "shoulddpreserve the industrial zoning and the land for industrial use. We agree with that assessment. • It is time to reevaluate the purpose of the area and realistic opportunities for future land use and growth. The potential for urban growth and economic development present an enormous opportunity for the City and one we would like to be included in. • We will continue to maintain a large and vibrant presence in,the corridor for the foreseeable future, but we would like to have the same flexibility with our property that is being given to everyone else in the MIC. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to speak with you this evening and we look in forward to working with you in the future. Shaunta Hyde, Manager Local Government Relations, South Puget Sound The Boeing CompanyP.O. Box 3707, MC 14 -49 Seattle, WA 98124 0 z availability to deeper waters for industrial use only. Staff will prepare an ordinance based on the Planning Commission's recommendation for their review. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. The Commission deliberated. VERN MERYHEW MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L02 -062, L02 -063 FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT /ZONING CODE WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE PROPOSED BE LIMITED TO THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE NOT ABBUTTING THE RIVER. BILL ARTHUR SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. CASE NUMBERS: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: Rebecca Fox gave the presentation for staff. Staff is working on incorporating a review of "Best Available Science ", which is a State of Washington requirement. Staff will bring proposed changes to the Commission for consideration prior to the 2004 deadline. At this time staff recommends approving a general "placeholder" amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which updates the Sensitive Areas/Natural Environment related policies to reflect changes in the Growth Management Act requirements including consideration of `Best Available Science." The Planning Commission expressed some confusion regarding this amendment and their roll with this amendment. Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development provided clarification by giving some background. Mr. Lancaster explained what staff is in the process of doing, and he also, explained what the Planning Commission's roll is in the process. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. The Commission deliberated. VERN MERYHEW MADE A MOTION TO DEFER CASE NUMBER L02 - 064, L02 - 065 FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONING CODE UNTIL 2004. BILL ARTHUR SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. CASE NUMBERS: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L02 -064, L02 -065 City of Tukwila Approve future amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code as it pertains to Sensitive /Critical Areas to include Best Available Science, and other issues per Growth Management Act requirements. All properties designated environmentally "Sensitive Areas" throughout Tukwila, WA L02 -067, L02 -068 Eric Robb/Barghausen Consulting Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code designations from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Rebecca Fox gave the presentation for staff. Given the property's encroachment issues, site development constraints including steep slopes and difficult access, and the availability of office use in other zones, staff recommended denial of the applicant's request at this time. Further staff recommended that if the applicant can resolve property encroachment issues and C C C develop a feasible alternative access plan by December 31, 2003, then the City will consider the request as part of the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code update in 2004. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. The Commission deliberated. ? w o: GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 6 RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L02 -067, L02 -068 FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 0 O AMENDMENT /ZONING CODE. HENRY MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. w Chair Whisler called a five minute recess. u .. w The public hearing reconvened. g u- ¢ BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW ]PUBLIC BEARING I— ILI Z = Chair Whisler swore in those wishing to provide testimony. z O CASE NUMBER: L03 -035 w APPLICANT: Starfire Sports, Christopher G. Slatt, President and CEO 0 REQUEST: Design Review for Starfire Sports project that includes upgrading athletic fields (addition of synthetic a 1-- turf to four existing soccer fields and development of three new synthetic soccer fields), construction of = w a 84,074 square feet athletic building with two indoor soccer fields, construction of a maintenance I-- building and a cover over an existing grandstand. "—' O LOCATION: Fort Dent Park, east of Interurban Avenue and.north of Fort Dent Boulevard (adjacent to the Green Iii z River) in Tukwila WA. 0 0~ Minnie Dhaliwal gave the presentation for staff. Staff recommended approval of the Design Review application. Z Bruce Fetcher, Director, Parks and Recreation, the lead staff on the project, gave some history on how the City acquired the park and how Starfire entered into an agreement with the City. Mr. Fetcher explained what the agreement entitles and how it will allow the City to keep the park open. Mr. Fetcher expressed the agreement between the City and Starfire as a true winning partnership that will give the residents a quality 54 -acre sports park. Christopher Slatt, for the applicant, explained how Starfire came to approach the City with the idea of a non - profit organization to create, "a world class facility ". Jud Youell, Landscape architect, for the applicant, described what the Sports Park would offer, discussed the design of the field, and the material used for turf on the field, and the advantages of using the material. Mr.Y.ouell also explained what will happen with the landscaping, as well as, answered questions. Christopher Slatt, answered questions concerning parking issues. Mr. Slatt explained it's hard to model parking and that CO O they did the best they could to estimate from experience and by talking to others. Mr. Slatt stated Starfire is required to © provide a monitoring plan, which the City must approve. CJ - CD Don Carlson, architect, for the appliant, gave an overview discussing the characteristics of the building. Mr. Carlson stated © his company has learned a lot of lessons about how to make large buildings friendly to the environment, stating it's the kind of background they are bringing to the project. Q:\PLANCOM \MINUTES \6- 26- 03.doc nh 3 oF f e. MINUTES Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development, provided clarification to some additional questions raised by the Planning Commission, regarding the parking issues. Mr. Lancaster explained there are two studies going -on, 1) a very specific parking management strategy, which needs to be approved by him, as the City's SEPA official, before Starfire can occupy the facility. The second study is a traffic analysis, to determine the traffic impact. This will be a program to monitor those events that are too hard to analyze before they happen. Mr. Lancaster also, addressed a question regarding handicap access. Mr. Lancaster stated that the project would be evaluated against the Washington State Accessibility code as part of the building permit review process. There must be a sufficient number of handicap parking spaces based on an analysis of the occupancy of the structure, and if possible the spaces must be located to prevent people from crossing drive ways or other obstacles. Christopher Slatt addressed a question regarding when the food court will be open. Mr. Slatt hopes the concession will be open as often as people want to use it, the main purpose of the concession is to support the athletes and the events. Starfire also addressed a question regarding the location of their trash. Public Testimony: None Rebuttal: None There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Whisler. The Commission deliberated. Commissioner Malina suggested that discounts for Tukwila residents and also the handicapped, be considered. HENRY MARVIN MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER L03 -035 FOR A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT. GEORGE MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION, ALL VOTED IN FAVOR. DIRECTOR REPORT • Commissioner Meryhew requested that staff forward the information regarding the current price value for the industrial zone land vs. the office zone to the City Council, and himself. • Chair Whisler requested a calendar of the next six months Planning Commission meetings. • Chair Whisler reported she would be absent from the August Planning Commission meeting. Adjourned at 9:55PM Respectfully Submitted Wynetta Bivens Administrative Secretary Q:\PLANCOM\MINUTES \6- 26 -03.doc DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MINUTES JULY 24, 2003 The Public Hearing was called to order by Vice Chair Malina at 7:00 p.m. Present: Vice Chair, George Mallina, Commissioners: 'Bill Arthur, Henry Marvin, and Margaret Bratcher Excused Absence: Chair, Kristine Whisler, Vern Meryhew, and Allan Ekberg Representing City Staff: Jack Pace, Minnie Dhaliwal, Brandon Miles, and Joyce Trantina Attachment 3 (b) HENRY MARVIN MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 26, 2003 MEETING. BILL ARTHUR SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO WERE GIVING TESTIMONY WERE SWORN IN BY VICE - CHAIR MALINA. OLD BUSINESS Discussion continued regarding the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning code Amendment allowing office uses in Manufacturing/Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H). Minnie Dhaliwal provided further clarification of the proposal, indicating that based on the Planning Commission's recommendations the proposed changes would allow up to 100,000 sq. feet of office use per lot as a conditional use in the MIC/H zone, except on lots that abut the Duwamish River and are north of the turning basin. After the June 26 meeting, Commissioner Meryhew talked with Steve Lancaster to clarify that the areas that needed to be preserved for water related industrial were those that were north of the turning basin. An additional concern involved how we look at existing offices. The Planning Commission recommended allowing existing office development that is currently accessory to other permitted to exceed the new size limitations provided they are approved as a conditional use when they are disassociated with manufacturing in the area. The example for that is the Boeing headquarters office building. i J:.4i'<! 1Z4 -, ai esi2∎CV4Itrs i iaCt ltk i, n Minutes July 24, 2003 Page 2 With regard to the land values in the industrial area compared to commercial land values, staff looked at the King County Assessors office and they do reports for the different areas of the county and according to their estimates, land values are $10 per sq. ft. along the Boeing property all the way down to Boeing access road. Comparable commercial zoned land ranges from $8 to $18 per sq. ft. Staff also included the lease rate information since once the buildings go in, the lease rates are much higher for commercial than industrial. The other issue had to do with preservation of the existing large lots for industrial uses and to achieve that objective the provision was to allow 100,000 sq. ft per lot that is in existence at the time the ordinance is adopted. Our zoning code currently has a definition of "lot ". In order to determine a legal lot, we have to look at it on a case -by -case basis. We are recommending that at the time the Conditional Use Permit Application comes in, we would look at the status of the existing lot to determine if it was in existence the day the ordinance was adopted or if it was created subsequent to that date. If Council adopts this ordinance sometime in August or Sept., then that is the date we would go by. The other option to include a map showing existing lots of record was not pursued since the only maps that are accurate are the assessor's maps and they don't necessarily mean they are legal lots. The property owner can have three tax bills for one parcel, which doesn't necessarily mean there are three lots there. Therefore, we are recommending we look at these on a case -by -case basis at the time of Conditional Use permit. If we take out the properties that abut the Duwamish River and are north of the turning basin, and we take out the area covered by the airport and Burlington Northern, we still have about 50% of the land area that is available for office uses. The number of lots is only 12 because they are very large lots, which is only 2% of the number of lots, but is 50% of the total land area which is still available for office use. In the Ordinance, under Conditional Uses, we have amended it to say the new office development shall not exceed 100,000 per lot that is a legal lot on the date of the ordinance, and no new offices shall be permitted on lots that abut the Duwamish and are north of the turning basin. Also, the ordinance would incorporate a map highlighting the parcels where we would NOT allow stand alone office buildings. The existing office developments that were established prior to the date that we adopted our comprehensive plan would be allowed to exceed the maximum size limitations provided they obtain conditional use approval. The two examples we know of where the 100,000 is exceeded are the Boeing headquarters office building and a technical park office building by the post office development (Sabey Office Bldg.). After further discussion, BILL ARTHUR MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S DRAFT PROPOSAL ON MIC REGULATIONS. HENRY MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. • Minutes July 24, 2003 Page 3 z NEW BUSINESS w re CASE NUMBER: L03 -027 _J 0 APPLICANT: T- Mobile U o co REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit to install a wireless communication facility at co w 1 LLJ 4240 Interurban Ave. S. I-- BILL ARTUR MADE THE DECLARATION THAT HIS WIFE IS EMPLOYED BY VERIZON 2 AND DAUGHTER IS EMPLOYED BY AT &T. HE IS EMPLOYED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER WHOSE PROPERTY IS LOCATED DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND IS IN DIRECT LINE OF SIGHT OF THIS FACILITY. HE DID co a = FEEL THAT IN SPITE OF THESE DECLARATIONS, HE WOULD BE ABLE TO FULFILL w HIS RESPONSIBILITIES ON THE COMMISSION WITHOUT ANY CONFLICT OF z INTEREST. z o ELI w THE APPLICANT HAD NO OBJECTION. v 0 52 Justin Abbott, 1530 Westlake Avenue North, Suite 600, Seattle, WA w !— = w U BRANDON MILES — indicated the City had a CUP to locate a wireless facility at 14240 Interurban Ave. u.. 0 S., currently zoned commercial/light industrial. The building is currently used for commercial activity, z the Fairway Center, south of the Riverside Inn. The building contains offices and the staff report contains 0 a list of businesses and uses. While most of the activity in this area is commercial, there are some o p- residential homes across the street, but the underlying zoning is commercial. The proposed facility z consists of 3 antennas that would be attached to the existing building. The ground equipment would be located on a concrete slab adjacent to the building. The ground equipment will be covered by a fence that is consistent with the existing building. It will be painted to match the same color as the building. The ground equipment will not be visible from Interurban, but will be from 143 The antennas are proposed to be 40 ft. in height, but it's only about 8 feet higher than the building, so it will not stand out as significantly unusual or obtrusive. This is the tallest building in the area, and this will have very little impact on the look of the building. Discussion followed regarding a requirement by the fire department for a cut -off switch. This is not a condition of the permit, but is something they have asked for relative to this application. The reason is that in the case of fire, some cell facilities can cause interference with fire department radios and communication equipment. The staff recommended approval of the CUP as submitted. Justin Abbott, Applicant — shared that the facility was designed to create the most visually unobtrusive facility possible. A 7 -ft. cedar fence will surround the ground equipment and landscaping that will provide a visual buffer from any other property. Tom Nguyen, T- Mobile radio frequency engineer was also present to answer questions as needed. Typically when a fire dept. goes into a building, it will shut the breakers off, but it appears as though the fire dept. is concerned about interference from the frequency C7 of the antenna's, and their own equipment. Minutes July 24, 2003 Page 4 Tom Nguyen, 19807 Northcreek Parkway North, Bothel, WA 98011 Licensed by the FCC for blocks E and F, which are not even close to the spectrum that the fire dept. uses. T- Mobile has located their equipment on many fire stations, with no difficulty of any kind. He feels it is more of a safety issue than interference — in case the fire dept. wants to shut down the antenna, due to electricity getting to those antennas. With regard to the equipment, he did not think that any switch would work. The best way to shut off the equipment is through a remote switch. Margaret Bratcher brought up some questions regarding the appearance of the building with the antenna and elevation drawings were presented. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. HENRY MARVIN MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF AND APPROVE CASE NO. L -03 -277 BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. MARGARET BRATCHER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Jack Pace reminded the c commissioners that there is a Conference for the Planning Commission and Planners scheduled for October in Spokane. We will make sure that all the commission members receive the information next week. There is finding in the budget, and individuals interested in attending should complete the form and return it to Wynetta as soon as possible. With regard to large -scale projects, Southcenter Mall is planning a 500,000 expansion, which is currently going through environmental and traffic review. The expansion includes a combination of parking, theatre, food court, and major tenant. In addition, J. C. Penney's will be tearing down a portion of the warehouse and putting up 180,000 — 300,000 retail space. Lastly, light rail is a big issue. Because light rail requires unclassified use as well as design review, it will automatically go to the Council, so the Council will be handling the application for light rail. If you would like some time this winter, I could give you a brief overview of the status of light rail, and what the station looks like. Update on sexual predator facility — the State will be holding public hearings on a 4 location, in the SoHo area (industrial area). The City of Tukwila will prepare and deliver comments at the hearing. Discussion continued regarding the Park and Fly near Lewis and Clark theatres and the need for landscape maintenance. Jack indicated he would look into it. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:45 P.M. • ' ;?!9YL X °• tom+ MEETING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 c�Y41' `'ti "'o•~ STAFF REPORT • TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Attachment 4 June 26, 2003 Notice published in the Seattle Times, June 12, 2003 . L02 -062 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) L02 -063 (Zoning Code Amendment) City of Tukwila Allow office uses in Manufacturing/Industrial Center/Heavy ( MIC/H) . MIC/H Zones citywide MIC/H MIC/H A. B. C. D. E. F. Jr i - Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Memo to Community and Parks Committee (2/03) Application along with Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria. Map showing existing land uses in the MIC/H area. Aerial photo of the MIC/H area. List of allowed uses in the MIC/H area. Eco Northwest market analysis report DISCUSSION A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; The proposal is to revise the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to allow office uses throughout the MIC/H zone. The Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2001 to allow offices as a permitted use in the MIC/L zone. The City Council has asked staff to study the changing shape of industry, the viability of industrial retention and expansion and the market for office uses in the heavy manufacturing areas closer to the Duwamish area. The Council has asked an evaluation of this issue to decide whether office should be allowed as stand alone use in the MIC/H zone. BACKGROUND • • FINDINGS L02 -062 & L02 -063 Office uses in MIC/H zone On February 11, 2003, Community Affairs and Parks Committee (CAP) was briefed on the issues with alloying office uses in the MIC/H zone. The detailed background information on the proposed code amendment is included in the attached memo to CAP (attachment A). The Committee agreed with the staff's recommendation to allow office uses of limited size and also allow existing office development that is currently accessory to other permitted uses to be used for stand alone offices. On March 17, 2003, Committee of the Whole was briefed on this issue and they decided to refer the proposal to the Planning Commission for further review. The staff also asked EcoNorthwest, Market Analysis firm to look at demand and supply factors related to industrial land and advantages/disadvantages of maintaining the industrial zoning. Attachment F is the report prepared by EcoNorthwest. Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center is an important regional center of industrial activity. It is one of the four regional centers of industrial activity designated in the King County's County Wide Planning Policies (CPP). Per CPP's local jurisdictions that include a manufacturing industrial center within their boundaries are required to have zoning that discourages land uses which are not compatible with manufacturing, industrial and advanced technology uses. Also, there must be limits on the size of office and retail uses unless they are an accessory use. The Growth Management Policy Board has recently released new draft criteria for public comment that will be applicable to Manufacturing Industrial Centers. Some of the highlights of proposed new criteria are: a) Required activity levels - employment thresholds: minimum existing employment level of 10,000 jobs and minimum employment target of at least 20,000 jobs. (In 2000 Tukwila MIC _ had 11,881 jobs). 2 b) Commitment to preservation of an urban industrial land base that shall include the following requirements: i) 80% of property within MIC must have planned future land use and current zoning designation for industrial and manufacturing uses. ii) Protection from incompatible land uses. iii) Regulations and plans to preserve and encourage the aggregation of vacant or non- manufacturing or industrial land parcels for manufacturing/industrial uses. Staff has taken into consideration the County Wide Planning Policies, looked at what other designated industrial centers allow, and reviewed the market analysis report prepared by EcoNorthwest to determine if office uses should be allowed in the MIC/H zone. REVIEW CRITERIA 1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? The Comprehensive Plan envisions the1VJIC as the focus of significant industrial activity. This is stated in Goal 11.1 and its associated policies: . .. � Goal 11.1 (Manufacturing/Industrial Center); Support for existing 'i/ dusirial activities in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center and development of industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the regional, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. The Comprehensive Plan states the MIC zones are intended primarily for industrial uses or activities that support these uses: Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while prohibiting unrelated uses. Current Comprehensive Plan regulations could be reconsidered to evaluate the declining role of manufacturing in society and the expanding role of office in the Manufacturing Industrial Center. If the Council decides to allow some office in the MIC/H zone, the policy will need to be amended to state while limiting unrelated uses instead of while prohibiting unrelated uses. 2) Impacts The proposal could be expected to result in more office development and a decrease in land available for and affordable to industrial uses in the MIC/H zone. More office development could result in more employment with greater traffic impacts. Other impacts to consider would include: 1) will having additional industrially -zoned land available for office development negatively impact industrial growth and retention in the e-4 -MIC/H zone; and 2) will allowing office in the MIC/H threaten the Manufacturing/Industrial Center designation. C) C) C7 3 L02 -062 & L02 -063 Office uses in MIC/H zone Additional jobs which might come from increased office development should be weighed against the possible loss of the Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MI /C) designation, impacts on redevelopment in the Tukwila Urban Center and along Tukwila International Boulevard, as well as increased costs of industrial land. If office is allowed as a stand -alone use we will need to reevaluate the' environmental work- EIS and Planned Action. The impacts of future office construction were not considered and mitigated at that time. If other non - industrial uses are permitted, there could be potential traffic issues with industrial traffic mixing with the office traffic. Also, transportation mitigation would need to be reevaluated. One option would be to allow, office uses as conditional uses and not consider any office development as a Planned Action instead require SEPA review if the proposal did not meet State Law exemptions for SEPA. 3) Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The proposed change addresses the public need (as expressed in developer interest and request for consideration by the 'City Council -for more office uses by considering allowing office in the MIC/H zone. The `identified public need" for office in MIC/H could be met through various means, which range from allowing office outright in the MIC/H zone to limiting the size of the offices and the locations in which they are allowed. Within the Duwamish Manufacturing Industrial Center in Seattle office uses are allowed but limited to 50,000 sq. ft. in some areas and 100,000 square feet in other areas. If the Planning Commission decides to allow office uses in the MIC/H zone then there are two issues that will need to be addressed: 1) Maximum size of office: Establishing a limit on the maximum size of any office development (e.g. 100,000 sq. ft as in Seattle's case) to meet the County Wide Planning Policies. This limit should be per lot and the regulations must have provisions to restrict the subdivision of land into smaller parcels to accommodate 100,000 square feet office uses on each lot. Since one of the goals of the new MIC designation criteria is aggregation of vacant and non - industrial parcels, one option to restrict potential requests for subdividing lots would be to allow 100,000 square feet of office per legal lot of record on the date the ordinance goes into effect. 2) Existing Office Uses: The other issue that needs to be addressed is the status of existing office buildings under the new code. The current code allows office uses in MIC/H zone only if they are associated with other permitted uses in the area (e.g. Boeing Headquarters building is permitted since it is associated with manufacturing in the area). In the event the permitted use ceases, the Planning Commission may want to consider recognizing such office uses that were originally associated with other permitted uses and allowing them as stand alone office uses even when they are not associated with other permitted uses. For existing buildings larger than 100,000 square feet, Planning Commission may want to consider allowing them to exceed _maximum size limitations and requiring Conditional Use permit at the time the associated permitted use ceases. 4 L02 -062 & L02 -063 Office uses in MIC/H zone 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what result can be expected and why? The proposed change could benefit the community by providing additional office space and employment. Alternately, additional office space in MIC/H could reduce the amount of regionally scarce industrial land and raise the price beyond the reach of manufacturing uses. Additional office uses in MIC/H might jeopardize the County's Manufacturing/Industrial Center designation for the area. w CONCLUSIONS The city will be looking at other permitted uses and the boundaries of the MIC/H area and determine if any changes need to be made as part of 2004 GMA update to the Comprehensive cn o Plan..At that time staff will study the area south of the Boeing Access Road (in between Tukwila w w International Boulevard and East Marginal Way) since it has slightly different characteristics -J F- (smaller lot sizes and more service oriented businesses) than the area north of the Boeing Access w o Road. �Q At this time staff is only looking at th'e_possibility of allow ing office uses in the MIC/H zone in c a response to a request by the City Council and has identified the following policy options for the F Planning Commission: " ° ' ' J' Z F 0 z t- A. Status quo option: Do not allow office as a stand -alone use in the MIC/H zone but only g as an accessory use to other allowed uses. O • D- o l- w w O w Z U N p _ o 1- B. Modify the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: 1. Allow some office use but limit the size to 100,000 square feet and list it as a conditional use to address traffic mitigation. No change is required to the County Wide Planning Policies. It will require Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. 2. Allow office use as outright permitted but limit the size to 100,000 square feet. 3. Allow office use as outright permitted use with no size or other restrictions. This would entail withdrawing Manufacturing Industrial Center designation from the Countywide Planning Policies. It will require Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. 4. Allow all existing office development to be continued to be used for office use. This would allow offices that are currently accessory to other permitted uses to be used as stand alone offices. Existing office buildings associated with manufacturing uses and exceeding 100,000 sq. ft. could be allowed to convert to stand alone office uses subject to a Conditional Use permit. C. Defer consideration as part of 2004 GMA update to the Comprehensive Plan. The scope of the issues looked at during the 2004 update would include looking at MIC/H boundaries, retail and office uses. RECOMMENDATIONS _In the light of findings and implications discussed in this report, staff recommends a combination of option B (1) and (4). 5 L02 -062 & L02 -063 Office uses in MIC/H zone z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Community Affairs and Parks Copnittee FROM: Steve Lancaster, DCD Directo RE: MIC/H study DATE: February 6, 2003 ATTACHMENT A Steven M. Mullet, Mayor • The Council'asked staff to find out answers to some questions regarding the changing shape of industry; the viability of industrial retention and expansion; and the importance *of Tukwila's industrial land base to the city and regional 'economy. The Council wanted to study this issue to decide whether office and similar non- industrial'uses be allowed as stand alone uses in the Heavy Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC/H) zone. Currently, offices in the MIC/H zone must be associated with another permitted use rather than being permitted outright. I. . BACKGROUND Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center is an important regional center of industrial activity. It is one of the four regional centers of industrial activity designated in the King County's County Wide Planning Policies. This designation reflects the corridor's long history of industrial uses and its current importance in the regional economy. It is well served by the regional transportation system and existing utility infrastructure. Since 1995, over 370 building permits have been completed in the MIC area. The total valuation of these permits exceeds $100,000,000. In '1998 the city of Tukwila did a comprehensive environmental review and adopted the "planned action" option for SEPA review in an effort to streamline the environmental review of any future development proposals. Since the adoption of the Planned Action ordinance there have been 32 SEPA reviews that were determined to be planned action. Some of the major projects that were reviewed as planned action include Wind Tunnel for Boeing and Museum of Flight addition. In 2000, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code was amended to allow office use less 20,000 square feet as a permitted use, in the MIC /L (Manufacturing industrial Center /Light) district. Office use over 20,000 square feet was allowed as a conditional use in order to address traffic impacts and access any mitigation due to the proximity to the residential neighborhoods. 63O0,5.0u0cent r, Bgu1;Va a,'«ia Cra �-i CO C7 O • 7 k ft �•i1a ,shinyon 98188 • Phone: 206-131..3670 • Fax. 00-4.31 -360' . +fin R,c+f'r'fizirtt_^ • C\I • If the price of land is perceived as low then demand for industrial land will be high. If price rises substantially primarily because of assessment of developers and businesses that alternative uses (e.g. CJ III. PUGET SOUNG REGIONAL COUNCIL'S NEW DESIGNATION CRITERIA FOR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL CENTERS. Growth Management Policy Board (GMPB) has released new draft criteria for public comment that will be applicable to Manufacturing /Industrial Centers. GMPB will make a final recommendation to Regional Council's Executive Board who will then take final action on the new criteria in winter or spring 2003. It was decided .that GMPB and Executive Boards should review approve Manufacturing /Industrial Center designations. Although VISION 2020 describes the characteristics and roles of regional Manufacturing /Industrial centers, it does not contain thresholds or standards for activity levels within them. The new proposed criteria has the activity and employment thresholds. Following are some highlights of the proposed new criteria: a) Required activity levels - employment thresholds: minimum existing employment level of 10,000 jobs and minimum employment target of at least 20,000 jobs. (In 2000 Tukwila MIC had 11,881 jobs). b) Commitment to preservation of an urban industrial land base that shall include the following requirements: • i) • 80% of property within MIC must have planned 'future land use and current zoning designation for industrial and manufacturing uses. ii) Protection from incompatible land uses. iii) Regulations and plans to preserve and encourage the aggregation of vacant or non - manufacturing or industrial land parcels for manufacturing/industrial uses. IV. CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE POLICIES The City's current Comprehensive Plan Policies clearly state that uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity such as offices and laboratories shall be allowed, while uses' unrelated to manufacturing and industry shall be prohibited. V. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS The staff asked EcoNorthwest, Market Analyses firm to look at demand and supply factors related to industrial land and give an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the industrial zoning. A complete report prepared by EcoNorthwest is attached to this memo and following are some key findings of the report • Industrial uses are similar to export companies that bring new revenues into the region as opposed to shifting resources within the region more typified by office uses. This introduces non -local spending into the economy as goods are sold outside the region. Such spending has higher multiplier effect on local employment and income than spending created by diverting spending from one area to another internally to the region. Tukwila already has a substantial commercial base in the Tukwila Urban Center area. 3 3 • If office use is allowed as a stand alone use in the MIC/H zone, the type of office development that the city may get in the MIC/H zone will be different than the type of office development in TUC and Tukwila International Boulevard area. It is likely that if the City allowed stand alone office use in the MIC /H area it will get larger scale office than the typical office building with suites that are used by small office companies. • Higher clean up standards apply to non - industrial uses under the Model Toxic Cleanup Act. Also, in the past the Duwamish Coalition as part of the Brownfield Cleanup has made long standing attempt with Department of Ecology to lower the standards of cleanup for industrial uses in the area. The Department of Ecology has not agreed to lower any standards so far. If non - industrial uses are allowed the chances of getting lower standards is further diminished. VII. POLICY OPTIONS AND NEXT STEP There are three policy options for the Council: A. Do not allow office as a 'stand -alone use in the MIC/H zone but only as an accessory use to other allowed uses. B. Allow all existing office development to be continued to be used for office use. This • would allow offices that are currently accessory to other permitted uses to be used as stand alone offices. C. Allow some office use but'limit the size and list it as a conditional use to address traffic mitigation. No change is required to the County Wide Planning Policies. It will require Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. D. Allow office use as outright permitted but limit the size to 100,000 square feet. E. Allow office use as outright permitted use with no size or other restrictions. This would entail withdrawing Manufacturing Industrial Center designation from the Countywide Planning Policies. It will require Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. In the light of the market analysis by EcoNorthwest and other findings and implications discussed above staff recommends a combination of option B and D. If the Council chooses to make changes to the existing policies and allow other non - industrial uses in the MIC/H zone, it will require updating the City's Comprehensive Plan and adopting new zoning code amendments. It may also result in a loss of status as a manufacturing/industrial center under the County Wide Planning Policies and under Vision 2020. If the decision is made to further pursue the path to make amendments then it needs to be decided whether to consider them during the 2004 GMA update to the Comprehensive Plan or as part of 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. Attachments: A: Map showing existing land uses in the MIC /H area. B: Aerial Photo of the MIC /H area. C: Market Analysis by EcoNWV j • t. • J. • • • Address: Phone 431 -3683 0 MPPHAMLANDUSE.APMCOMPAPP.doc. 0621100 i •L; E,iVEE'TTACHMENT B • DEC 2 v 2002 • COMMUNITY COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Developm'ehh l_. P M ENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 PLAN /ZONING CODI Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS E -mail: tukplan@ci.tuk-wila.wa.us CITY OF TUKWILA NAME OF PROJE EVELOPME]Qfi: Considgx Comprehensive Plan policies to allow office uses in Manufacturing /Industrial Center - -Heavy (MIC /H) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision. access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. All MIC /H zones city wide Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards. and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Rebecca Fox /City of Tukwila . 11 • . . .. FAX: 206 -431 -3665 Signature: Date: 17/76/07 FOR STAFF F USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -CPA/P ZCA Planner: Rebecca Fox File Number: L02 -062 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: j • t. • J. • • • Address: Phone 431 -3683 0 MPPHAMLANDUSE.APMCOMPAPP.doc. 0621100 i •L; E,iVEE'TTACHMENT B • DEC 2 v 2002 • COMMUNITY COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Developm'ehh l_. P M ENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 PLAN /ZONING CODI Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS E -mail: tukplan@ci.tuk-wila.wa.us CITY OF TUKWILA NAME OF PROJE EVELOPME]Qfi: Considgx Comprehensive Plan policies to allow office uses in Manufacturing /Industrial Center - -Heavy (MIC /H) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision. access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. All MIC /H zones city wide Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards. and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Rebecca Fox /City of Tukwila . 11 • . . .. FAX: 206 -431 -3665 Signature: Date: 17/76/07 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: Various, including LDR, TUC, MIC /H Proposed: No change proposed B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: Various, including LDR, TUC, MIC/H No change proposed F- Proposed: c 6 0 C. LAND USE(S): J Existing: MarirntS riPppnciing nn 1nratinn Nu. Proposed: No change propos w O . (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) IL = w D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: zz Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all direction's from the property or area for Z F a change is posed. = ? o which pro Various, depending on location O • P- O 1— w U L i - O w Z U - F- H . O GAAP PHAMLANO USE. APP'COMPAPP.doe. O6/=g/CO M C C C Z -C\2 C C C A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMA 18.80.050) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a re- designation of your property or a change in existing Plan policies: 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? Comprehensive Plan policies should be evaluated to consider the ce w The current Com p P declining role of manufacturing in society and the expanding role of office in ? o the Manufacturing /Industrial Center, especially the MIC /H. u, 0 w J 2. Why is the proposed changed the best means for meeting the identified o public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public 2 need? g The proposed change addresses the public need (as expressed in developer interest and request for consideration by the City Council) for more office uses by allowing I 1-1 office in the MIC/H iotie. It would be necessary to consider the impacts of allowing ? additional of f ices, _y, a - the Manufacturing /Industrial Center designation. It would z o also be necessary to take traffic impacts into account when considering this proposal. ? o U 3. Why will the proposed changes result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what type o w uj The proposed change could benefit the community by providing additional office space and employment. Alternatively, additional office space in MIC /H could reduce the o amount of regionally- scarce industrial land and raise the price beyond the reach of o manufacturing uses. Additional office uses in MIC /H might jeopardize the County's Manufacturing /Industrial Center designation for the area, and also divert office uses from the Tukwila Urban Center and Tukwila International Boulevard. of benefit can be expected and why? COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (TMC 18.80.010) 1. A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; The proposal is to revise the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to allow office uses throughout the MIC /H zone. The Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2001 to allow offices as a permitted use in the MIC /L zone. Developers have expressed interest in allowing additional office uses in the heavy manufacturing areas closer to the Duwamish area, and the City Council has requested an evaluation of the proposal. 2. A statement of the anticipated impacts of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change; The proposal is expected to result in more office development and a decrease in land available for industrial uses in the MIC /H zone. The key issues are: 1) will having additional industrially -zoned land available for office development negatively impact industrial growth and retention in the MIC /H zone; 2) will allowing office in the MIC /H threaten the Manufacturing /Industrial Center designation; 3) will additional land available for office redevelopment along Tukwila International Boulevard and in the Tukwila Urban Center. 3. An explanation of why the current comprehensive plan or development regulations are deficient or should not continue in effect; Current Comprehensive Plan regulations should be reconsidered to acknowledge the declining role of manufacturing in society and the expanding role o'f- :office in the Manufacturing Industrial Center, especially the MIC /H. The Comprehensive Plan envisions the MIC as the focus of significant industrial activity. This is stated in Goal 11.1 and its associated policies: boa/ 11.1 (Manufacturing/Industrial Center); Support for existing industrial activities in the Manufacturing /Industrie/ Center and development .of industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the regional, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. The Comprehensive Plan states the MIC zones are intended primarily for industrial uses or activities that support these uses: Po /icy 11.1.5: A / /ow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, inc //ding those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while prohibiting unrelated uses. 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific requirements of the Growth Management Act; The proposal promotes the following goals from the Growth Management Act: • .Urban Growth— Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner... • Economic Development-- Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive Plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens for this state,... 5. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide Policies: , Countywide Planning Policies discuss Manufacturing /Industrial Centers. Manufacturing /Industrial Center's are characterized by a significant amount of manufacturin'g;- iaaust"rial and advanced technology employment. They differ from other employment areas, such as business /office parks, in that a land base and the segregation of major non - manufacturing uses are essential elements of their operation. FW -15 Within the Urban Growth Area, the Countywide Planning Policies shall assure the creation of a number of locally determined Manufacturing /Industrial Centers which meet specific criteria. The Manufacturing /Industrial Centers shall be characterized by the following: a. Clearly defined geographic boundaries; b. Intensity /density of land uses sufficient to support manufacturing, industrial and advanced technology uses; c. Reasonable access to regional highway, rail \, air and /or waterway system for the movement of goods; d. Provisions to discourage large office and retail development; e. l=ast -track project permitting. W -52 Each jurisdiction which contains a regional Manufacturing /Industrial Center shall adopt in its comprehensive plan a definition of the Center which specifies the exact geographic boundaries of the Center. Jurisdictions with Manufacturing /Industrial Centers shall have zoning and detailed plans in place to achieve the following goals by the year 2010: a. Preserve and encourage the aggregation of vacant or non - manufacturing /industrial land parcels for manufacturing /industrial uses; b. Discourage land uses which are not compatible with manufacturing, industrial and advanced technology uses; c. Accommodate a minimum of 10,000 jobs, and; d. Limit the size of offices and retail unless as an accessory use County -wide Policies discuss providing buffers around the periphery of the Manufacturing /Industrial Center as follows: LU -58 Jurisdictions' comprehensive plans for regional Manufacturing /Industrial Centers shall demonstrate compliance with the _criteria. In order to promote manufacturing /industrial- growth, the Manufacturing /Industrial Center plan for each jurisdiction shall establish strategies; a. To provide capital facility improvement projects which support the movement of xgoods.and manufacturing /industrial operations; b. To coordinate planning with serving utilities to ensure that utility facilities are available to serve such Centers; c. To provide buffers around the Center to reduce conflicts with adjacent /and uses; d. To facilitate land assembly; and e. To attract the type of businesses that will ensure economic growth and stability. 6. A statement of what changes, if any, would be required in functional plans (i.e., the City's water, sewer, storm water or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment is adopted; No changes known at present. 7. A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be needed to support the proposed change, and how the proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of the City; and No additional changes are known at present. 8. A statement of what other changes, if any, are required in other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the proposed change. No additional changes are known at present. z i� ZONING AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.030) ' w J 1. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity N o with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the J i provisions of this title, and the public interest; cn o Any change will be prepared in conjunction with an amendment to the Comprehensive w Land Use Policy Plan and the public interest. g w h- lil 2. The use or' change in zociiig requested in the zoning ;map or this title for z the establishment of_ commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported w w • b a n architectural' site plan showing the proposed development and its ? o relationship to surrounding o cn Not applicable. u ° ,' w w ~� .. w z U co O ~ z r‘ Sections: 18.38.010 18.38.020 18.38.030 18.38.040 18.38.050 18.38.060 18.38.070 18.38.080 ILA MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 18.38 MANUFACTURING/INDUSTRIAL CENTER - HEAVY (MIC /H) DISTRICT Purpose Permitted Uses Accessory Uses Conditional Uses Unclassified Uses On -Site Hazardous Substances Design Review Basic Development Standards 18.38.010 Purpose This district implements the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation. It is intended to provide a major employment area containing heavy .or bulk manufacturing and industrial uses, -distributide -and light manufacturing and industrial uses, and other uses that support those industries. - This district's tae's and standards are intended to .enhance the redevelopment of the Duwamish Corridor. * `` - (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.38.020 Permitted Uses The following uses are permitted outright within' the Manufacturing Industrial Center - Heavy Industrial district, subject to compliance with all other applicable requirements of the Tukwila Municipal Code. 1. Adult entertainment establishments are permitted, subject to the following location restrictions: a. No adult entertainment establishment ' shall be allowed within the following distances from the following specified uses, areas or zones, whether such uses, areas or zones are located within or outside the City limits: (1) In or within 1,000 feet of any LDR, MDR; •HDR, MUO, 0, NCC, RC, RCM or TUC zone districts or any other residentially zoned, property; (2) In or within 1/2 mile of: (a) Public or private school with curricula equivalent to elementary, junior or senior high schools, or any facility owned or operated by such schools, and (b) Care centers, preschools, nursery schools or other child care facilities; (3) In or within 1,000 feet of: (a) public park, trail, or public recreational facility; or • !' (b) church, temple, synagogue or chapel, or (c) public library. b. the distances specified in TMC I8.38.020.1.a. shall be measured by following a straight line from the nearest point of the property parcel upon Page 18 -68 ATTACHMENT E which the proposed. dse is to be located, to the nearest point of the parcel of property or land use district boundary line from which the proposed land use is to be separated. c. No adult entertainment establishment shall be allowed to locate within 1,000 feet of an exist- ing adult entertainment establishment. The distance specified in this section shall be measured by following a straight line between the nearest points of public entry into each establishment. 2. Automotive services: a. gas, outside pumps allowed; b. washing; c. body and engine repair shops (enclosed within a building). 3. Beauty or barber shops. 4. Bicycle repair shops. 5. Brew pubs. 6. Bus stations. '7. Computer software development and simi- lar uses. 8. Contractor storage yards. 9. Day care centers. • 10. Financial: a. banking; b. mortgage; c. other services. 11. Heavy equipment repair and salvage. 12. Heavy metal processes such as smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging, or drop hammering. 13. Hotels. 14. Industries involved with etching, film pro- cessing, lithography, printing, and publishing. 15. Internet data /telecommunication centers. 16. Laundries: a. self- serve; b. dry cleaning; c. tailor, dyeing. 17. Libraries, museums or art galleries (public). 18. Manufacturing, processing and /or assem- bling chemicals, light metals, plastics, solvents, soaps, wood, coal, glass, enamels, textiles, fabrics, plaster, agricultural products or animal products (no rendering or slaughtering). 19. Manufacturing, processing and /or assem- bling of previously manufactured metals, such as iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable elec- trode 'melting; and similar heavy industrial uses. 20. Manufacturing, processing and /or assem- bling previously prepared metals including, but not H limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or punching of • • Cn metal, engraving, galvanizing and hand - forging. 21. Manufacturing, processing and /or assem- . G°: bling of electrical or mechanical equipment, vehicles C-D and machines including, but not limited to, heavy and `C light machinery, tools, airplanes, boats or other trans- portation vehicles and equipment. Printed January 2, 2003 ��.?cza:;, + �.; a*?. v:- •�c'i }c';;.k•+�a�'=;i"rrctr;E:, �,.,x��.#h�y.�.p?FGi•,��4�;'s 22. Manufacturing, processing and /or packag- ing of food, including but not limited to, baked goods, beverages (including fermenting and distilling), candy, canned or preserved foods, dairy products and byprod- ucts, frozen foods, instant foods and meats (provided that no slaughtering is permitted). 23. Manufacturing, processing and /or packag- ing pharmaceuticals and related products, such as cos- metics and drugs. 24. Manufacturing, processing, and /or packag- ing previously prepared materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms, brushes, canvas, clay, cloth- ing, fur, furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper, plastics, rubber, tile, and wood. 25. Manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging and /or repairing electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental equipment, photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and recording equipment. 26. Motels. .. 27. Offices; must be associated with another permitted uses (e.g., administrative offices for a manu- facturing company present-within the MIC). . 28. Outpatient, inpatient, and emergency med- ical and dental. 29. Parks, trails, picnic areas and playgrounds (public) but not including amusement parks, golf courses, or commercial recreation. ' 30. Railroad tracks, (including lead, spur, load - ing or storage). 31. Recreation facilities (commercial - indoor), athletic or health clubs. 32. Restaurants, including: a. drive - through; b. sit down; • c. cocktail lounges in conjunction with a restaurant. 33. Rock crushing, asphalt or concrete batching or mixing, stone cutting, brick manufacture, marble work, and the assembly of .products from the above materials. 34. Sales • and rental of heavy machinery and equipment subject to landscaping requirements of the Landscape, Recreation, Recycling/Solid Waste Space Requirements chapter of this title. 35. Salv4ge and wrecking operations. 36. Schools and studios for education or self - improvement. 37.:Storage (outdoor) of materials is permitted up to a height of 20 feet with a front yard setback of 25 feet, and to a height of 50 feet with a front yard setback of 100 feet; security required. '38. Storage (outdoor) of materials allowed to be ,C manufactured or handled within facilities conforming { C. to uses under this chapter; and screened pursuant to O the Landscape, Recreation, Recycling /Solid Waste Space Requirements chapter of this title. 39. Taverns, nightclubs. Printed January 2, 2003 ..• TITLE 1 a 40. Telephone exchanges. 41. Tow truck operations, subject to all . tonal State and local regulations. 42. Truck terminals. 43. Warehouse storage and /or wholesale dis- tribution facilities. 44. Other uses not specifically listed in this title, which the Director determines to be: a. similar in nature to and compatible with other uses permitted outright within this district; and b. consistent with the stated purpose of this district; and c. consistent with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. (Ord. 1986 §14, 2001; Ord, 1974 §10, 2001; Ord. 1971 §16, 2001; Ord. 1814 §2, 1997; Ord. 1774 §4, 1996; Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.38.030 Accessory Uses Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly incidental to such permitted use, are allowed within the Manufacturing' Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial district, as follows: 1. Billiard or pool rooms. '2. Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or approved condi- tional uses such as universities, colleges or schools. 3. Parking areas. • 4. Recreational area and facilities for employ- ees. 5. Residences for security or maintenance personnel. (Ord. 1976 §57, 2001; Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.38.040 Conditional Uses The following uses may be allowed within the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial district,.subject to the requirements, procedures, and conditions established by the Conditional Use Permits chapter of this title. 1. Colleges and universities. 2. Electrical substations - distribution. 3. Fire and police stations. 4. Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities (off -site) subject to compliance with state siting criteria (RCW 70.105; see TMC 21.08). 5. Park and ride lots. • 6. Radios, television, microwave, cellular or observation stations and towers. 7. Recreation facilities (public) including, but not limited to, sports fields, community centers, and golf courses. • 8. Retail sales of health and beauty aids, pre- scription drugs, food, hardware, notions, crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants, pets, Page 18 -69 TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE :7 . • jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items; limited to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or the employees of those uses. (Ord. 1865 §44, 1999; Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.38.050 Unclassified Uses The following uses may be allowed within the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial district, subject to the requirements, procedures and conditions established by TMC Chapter 18.66, Unclas- sified Use Permits. 1. Airports, landing fields and heliports (except emergency sites). 2. Cement manufacturing. 3. • Correctional institution. 4. Electrical substation transmission /switching. 5. Essential public facilities, except those uses listed separately in any of the districts established by this .title. e7n 6. Hydroelectric and private utility power generating plants. • .. . - 7. Landfills and excavations which • the responsible official, acting- pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, determines are significant environmental actions. 8. Manufacturing,• refining, dr storing highly volatile noxious or explosive products (less than tank car lots) such as acids, petroleum products, or gas, matches, fertilizer or insecticides; except for accessory storage of such materials. 9. Mass transit facilities. 10. Railroad freight or classification yards. 11. Removal and processing of sand, gravel,;' rock, peat, black soil, and other natural deposits together with associated structures. 12. Secure community transition facility, sub- ject to the following location restrictions: a. No secure community transition facil- ity shall be allowed within the specified distances from the following uses, areas or zones, whether such uses, areas or zones are located within or outside the City limits: (1) In or within 1,000 feet of any resi- dential zone. (2) Adjacent to, immediately across a street or parking lot from, or within the line of sight of a "risk potential activity/facility" as defined in RCW 71.09.020 as amended, that include: (a) Public and private schools; (b) School bus stops; (c) Licensed day care and licensed preschool facilities; (d) Public parks, publicly dedicated trails, and sports fields; (e) Recreational and community centers; (f) Churches, synagogues, tem- ples and mosques; and (g) Public libraries. (3) One mile from. any existing secure community transitional facility or correctional institution. . b. No secure community transition facil- ity shall be allowed on any isolated parcel which is otherwise considered eligible by applying the criteria listed under TMC 18.38.050 -12.a, but is completely surrounded by parcels ineligible for the location of such facilities. c. The distances specified in TMC 18.38.050 -12.a shall be measured as specified under Department of Social and Health Services guidelines established pursuant to RCW 71.09.285, which is by following a straight line from the nearest point of the property parcel upon which the secure community transitional facility is to be located, to the nearest point of the- parcel of property or land use district boundary line from which the proposed land use is to be sepa- rated. d. The parcels eligible for the location of secure community transition facilities by • applying the siting criteria listed above and information available as of August 19, 2002, . are shown in Figure 18 -11, "Eligible Parcels for Location of Secure Community Transition Facilities." Any changes' in the development pattern and the location of risk sites /facilities over time shall be taken into consideration to determine if the proposed site meets the siting criteria at the time of the permit application. 13. Transfer stations (refuse and garbage) when operated by a public agency. (Ord 1991 §9, 2002; Ord. 1976 §58, 2001; Ord. 1865 §45, 1999; Ord. 1758 §1 (part), 1995) 18.38.060 On -Site Hazardous Substances No on -site hazardous substance processing and handling, • or hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall be permitted, unless clearly incidental and secondary to a permitted use. On -site hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall be subject to the State siting criteria (RCW 70.105). (See TMC 21.08.) (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.38.070 Design Review Administrative design review is required for new developments within 300 feet of residential districts or .within 200 feet of the Green /Duwamish River. • (Ord. 2005 §14, 2002; Ord. 1758 §1(part), 199510 — O ..,,v..,�,,.wa;:, r ;:�.�.+z!;..�^ tug >., •.;, Printed January 2 , 2003 .�, q'., zT±'+ is .,.fy.wr�.,,.i�: ? ^.�:Y�s•nr.,, i��, «..4 'a5', w°t W� �NVt'�?K9 Section 1 Introduction 1.2 METHODS 1.3 ORGANIZATION Industrial Land in North Tukwila ECONorthwest ATTACHMENT F 1.1 BACKGROUND The City of Tukwila is preparing for the possibility that large amounts of industrial land in North Tukwila currently owned by Boeing may come on the market if Boeing z downsizes. The City asked ECONorthwest for advice on how to respond if either buyers • Q or sellers of that property make the case that it should be rezoned to allow non - industrial ;t- w uses. In particular, the City seeks an answer to the question: 1 "Should the City preserve the industrial zoning and the land for industrial use, or v 0 should it rezone the land ?" u) o w To that end, the City hired ECONorthwest to look at demand and supply factors j related to industrial land, and give an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of u. maintaining the industrial zoning. w 0 u Q Both the City and ECO acknowledge that this area of research could warrant a study = w well beyond the scope of this project. For example, a detailed analysis of the importance z of the industrial land in Tukwila could benefit from a careful inventory of the amount, p attributes, and price of industrial land throughout the entire Puget Sound region. This w F' study could not conduct that analysis. Instead, it relies on existing data and synthesizes 2 from various sources (data sets, reports, interviews) to create an understandable overview v of demand and supply conditions for industrial land. N PPl Y o� Ili i n � u. The rest of this report examines the demand and supply for industrial land. National z trends are discussed, along with the relevance of the national trends to Tukwila's zoning. 0 co The discussion regarding demand for industrial land begins with defining industrial land 0 H and identifying the users of industrial land. It discusses the national and regional trends in z industrial employment, and the changing nature of the demand for industrial lands. The supply for industrial lands within the central Puget Sound region is summarized next, along with infrastructure issues that affect the suitability of existing industrially zoned lands for industrial uses. Finally, the supply of land in Tukwila's industrially zoned areas is discussed and examined in terms of factors that affect the future supply and demand for Tukwila's industrial lands. January 2002 Page 1 Section 2 Framework for the Evaluation 2.1 WHAT IS INDUSTRIAL LAND? What is commonly referred to as "industrial" land is land designated by a local government (in its Comprehensive Plan, implemented by its zoning ordinances) to allow • z (but not necessarily require) industrial uses. These industrial uses are described below. Ce w The land is designated industrial because it meets the needs of the industrial users. JU These needs include: proximity to transportation routes (interstate roadways, rail, water U O ports, airports), relatively low -cost land (to accommodate the relatively large Iand needs u) of many industries), and a location that reduces conflict with other uses. w 2 2.2 WHO USES INDUSTRIAL LAND? w O Industrial uses are usually identified as a collection of sectors from the Standard g 5 Industrial Classification (SIC) system: �'- � = • Manufacturing F- w z � • Transportation, Communication and Utilities O z F— • Wholesale Trade • Mining and Construction v O — al !— These sectors share some basic characteristics. First, they are often referred to as w w "traded" or "basic" sectors, which tend to be export- oriented and involved in direct 2 creation of physical goods: (But note that this distinction has always been fuzzy and is u- ~O getting blurrier in today's economy. Many businesses in the Services sector are export- z oriented: e.g., business services and tourism). Second, they generally have the same 0 building and land needs and site requirements. They cannot typically locate in high -rise P ' — office space or in storefront retail space, or in converted homes. This limitation is in part z related to possible external effects that can make them unattractive neighbors; they can be noisy, dirty, smelly, or ugly. (But note that many industrial uses can have fewer external impacts than businesses in other sectors: e.g., on traffic). The limitation also relates to their general need for cheap land and proximity to transportation routes. There are two important points with regard to the relationship between industrial land and these "industrial" sectors. Page 2 ECONorthwest • Not all jobs in "industrial " sectors use industrially- designated land. For example, a head office of a manufacturing company is likely to be in a downtown office /commercial zone rather than in an industrial part of a city. Another example is that some firms in the industrial sectors are allowed to locate in general commercial or mixed -use zones and may do so. • Not all industrially- designated land is used by "industrial" sectors. Some • businesses that are referred to by the SIC system as "services" need industrial land (for example, auto repair) because they share the same need for a location where land is cheap and where their activity is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, non - industrial uses that don't necessarily require the characteristics of industrial land (low price, access to transportation, etc.) may nevertheless locate there if (1) they are not prohibited from doing so, and (2) the market conditions allow them to out -bid industrial uses. For example, services January 2002 r *„ Industrial Land in North Tukwila Industrial Land in North Tukwila MERIMISTIASTAIMIrt may locate in an industrial area to serve food and other convenience needs of industrial workers. Residential uses may also find an industrial area attractive if the environmental effects of industry are not too deleterious and the location is convenient for residential living. Most significantly, given the focus of this study, professional offices and other commercial uses may locate on industrial land because they can out -bid industrial uses. This is the City of Tukwila's concern: that large amounts of industrial land will convert to non - industrial uses. Figure 1 shows this relationship between "industrial" jobs and "industrial" land, and why studies of industrial land like this one are tricky. On the "Land" side, our analysis is concerned with only land designated industrial, and is concerned with both vacant and developed industrial land. On the "Employment" side, the study cannot limit itself to industrial SICs: non - industrial users use industrial land. It also cannot limit itself to a subset of businesses that in some sense "need" industrial land, because many businesses that fail to meet whatever need criteria we might develop will still be users of industrial land. Figure 1. How industrial and non - industrial businesses use industrial land Industria LAND Non Industrie Among the questions that the City of Tukwila is asking with this study is "How much industrial land does the City or region need ?" Our general conclusion, described in the text above and illustrated in Figure 1, is that industrial land must accommodate most job growth in "industrial" sectors. It must also accommodate some job growth in "non- industrial" sectors. The analysis later in this memorandum attempts to quantify that general conclusion. 23 THE ROLE OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY IN AN ECONOMY Industrial activity generally involves the manufacturing or handling of goods for consumers or other industry. In economic parlance, industrial activity is termed "goods producing" industry. Its activity is generally considered a "high value added" activity, because relatively low -value inputs are used to create goods that have high market value. C..Cy A service industry, by way of contrast, tends mainly to sell transformed labor services. CY) Hence, the value of the service is largely linked directly to the value of the labor inputs. C There is value added, of course, but this value added often is lower than in a good producing setting. C C ECONorthwest -- i �t'��a�.. �• �sn; n. vr. �. ..�:�,�- .�Y'�nai:F,:��44�Y,ra:w EMPLOYMENT •r Non - Industrie SIC i Will U Industrie Not Use trial Lan January 2002 Page 3 Page 4 There are exceptions. Service sectors that use highly trained human capital may have high productivity and high value added. In addition, as technology increases the productivity of physical capital, less manufacturing and construction activity is required to produce the same output, so that incomes can rise despite lower manufacturing levels. The communication system, for example, is much more productive than it was in the past, but requires much less "brick and mortar" type activities and, hence, less construction activity. The importance of the value -added notion for a region is that a region's income depends largely upon the aggregate amount of value added that is created in that region. Although some of the value added "leaks" outside of the region as the result of non -local ownership of enterprises operating within the region, generally speaking, it is beneficial to have local firms engaged in high value -added activities, contributing to the income of the regional ownership and investors. The other advantage of a strong manufacturing sector to a region is that the industry tends to sell largely outside the region. In contrast, service industries tend to provide services more locally, and thus do not contribute as significantly to the "export" base of the region. The advantage of export- oriented businesses is that they introduce non -local spending into the local economy. Everything else being equal, such spending has a higher multiplier effect on local employment and income than spending created by diverting spending from one area to another internally to the region. Employment multipliers on pure service industries (and government) are much lower because they tend to involve "diverted" rather than "new" spending in the region. At the extreme, retail sales enterprises generally create large leakages of spending outside of the region, since most retail goods are not manufactured inside the region. In summary, industrial.activity that is high value -added and export oriented (i.e., exports outside of the region), has the greatest effect on maintaining a strong local economy, everything else being equal. There are some qualifications to this, and it is certainly the case that technology has diminished the role of traditional manufacturing, construction and mining activity in the economy. Nonetheless, most state and local governments try to encourage industrial development. Some do that by providing incentives; almost all try to ensure that they at least have provided adequate sites and infrastructure so that firms are not discouraged from moving to or remaining in the area. 2.4 IMPLICATIONS OF GLOBAL TRENDS FOR U.S. METROPOLITAN REGIONS A key question for this study is, Can the Puget Sound region can expect to retain much industrial activity, given the comparative cost advantage of manufacturing overseas and elsewhere in the U.S.? If it cannot, then maintaining industrial land reserves and other policies to maintain industrial site availability makes less sense. It is true that the United States; generally, and the Puget Sound region, specifically, now have a smaller share of employment in the manufacturing industries than they had in previous decades, and this share has been declining steadily. In the United States, the amount of employment in industrial sectors has remained relatively flat over the past 45 years, but industrial employment as a share of total non -farm employment has declined dramatically from 40 percent in 1955 to 20 percent in 2000 (Figure 2). 1 For this analysis, just the core sectors of manufacturing, mining, and construction; not wholesale trade or transportation, communication, and utilities. ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila N • CO C C C C :e-'xrn „,� .vnn�rvrs.:n >. q,. x,• sy�t .+#4l"fia.'�'M"e�.rvc�d',or"rs sa.0 is 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 00 C,r} 0 Q CD Figure 2. U.S. industrial employment as a share of total non -farm employment, 1955 -2000 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 , 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Source: ECONorthwest analysis of United States Bureau of Labor Statistics data. This trend will not continue indefinitely. The theory of international trade explains why. Even if one country has an absolute cost advantage in every product, there will still be industrial activities that will survive in countries with the absolute cost disadvantage. The reason is that international trade patterns are driven by comparative cost advantage rather than absolute cost advantages. The theory of comparative economic advantage . states that trade will occur so as to maximize the output of the world economy, given its labor and other resources. No single country is able to monopolize all industries because, if it were to do so, labor and other resources in other countries would not be utilized, and world output would decline. Exchange rates and local prices would move so as to make the relative prices in the advantaged and disadvantaged countries conducive to trade. If this were not the case, of course, trade could not occur at all in the extreme, since all flows of foreign currency would be in one direction. Hence, it is impossible for any one country or region to monopolize an industrial sector. Economists have demonstrated that as long a country is relatively more efficient at producing one good than another, it will be able to engage in the manufacture of the first good even though, in absolute terms, some other country could produce both goods more cheaply. These relative terms of trade will change over time, and there will definitely be industries that will leave the United States and the Puget Sound region for other countries. But there will remain some industries that are comparatively more efficient to operate in the United States, and industries that leave may return. The automobile industry in the United States remains strong, for example, and in recent years, Japanese and German companies have found it comparatively less costly to manufacture their vehicles in the United States. Ten years ago, it was widely believed that automobile manufacturing activity would be moving in the opposite direction. Industrial Land in North Tukwila ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 5 Interregional (that is, within the United States) industry patterns are less subject to the law of comparative advantage, because there is no exchange -rate mechanism to contribute to the necessary adjustments in relative prices. Nevertheless, relative prices do change to maintain industry in all regions. For example, if all industrial activity tried to locate to a single, low -wage US region, the cost of housing and other amenities in the destination region would rise and higher wages would follow. Consequently, the Puget Sound region should not expect that all of its industrial activity will be lost to other regions in the United States, either. In summary, we do not interpret the long -run trends of a declining share of employment in industrial sectors in the US to mean that there will not be absolute growth in those sectors in the US, and in the metropolitan areas that compose it. As the next sections show, the official long -run regional forecasts are for growth in industrial employment. The exact amount of growth is certainly and always in question, but the underlying economic fundamentals of the US and Puget Sound economies make growth in industrial employment more likely than decline in the long run. Page 6 ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila Industrial Land in the Section 3 Puget Sound Region 3.1 DEMAND FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION 3.1.1 TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION Employment statistics help clarify the relationship between regional economic conditions and demand for industrial lands. PSRC analysis revealed that more than half (57 percent) of the region's industrial jobs were located on industrial lands . Manufacturing (70 percent) and transportation (60 percent) jobs are the most concentrated on industrial lands in the four - county region of King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties. These regional percentages closely match the distribution of jobs within King County alone, which is not surprising since King County jobs account for about 70 percent of the region's total. Of the 410,800 "covered" jobs located on industrial lands region -wide, two- thirds are classified as industrial by.our definition (also used in the PSRC report). The remaining one -third includes primarily jobs in the Services sector —many of which may be closely related to industrial jobs. Other jobs locating on industrial lands may not be industrial at all, but allowed in a particular city's zoning code for reasons unique to that city . With more than 100,000 jobs in the central Puget Sound region at the time of PSRC's studies, the Boeing Company dominated industrial jobs. In 1999, the aerospace sector alone accounted for 25 percent of industrial jobs regionwide. The PSRC study found that aerospace employment alone accounted for more than 20 percent of the jobs located on industrial lands in the region (roughly 90,000 of the 415,000 jobs on industrial land). Within the region, industrial employment growth was concentrated in certain areas during the 1990s, though those areas were dispersed across the region (Figure 3). The two darkest shaded areas in Figure 3 show the effect of employment increases at Boeing, with growth concentrated in Everett' (Snohomish County) and the Kent Valley (King County). The shaded areas south of Seattle generally follow Interstate -5 into Pierce County. 2 Technical Addendum: Employment, Land Use and Infrastructure Characteristics of Lands Designated as Industrial in Comprehensive Plans (1998). Discussed in detail in the Supply section of this report. 3 Sub -area analysis completed by PSRC relies on data from the Washington State Employment Security Department, referred to as "covered employment." These jobs are covered by the State's unemployment insurance program and estimated to generally exclude 10 – 14 percent of jobs (proprietors, self - employed, others). Also, the PSRC Technical Addendum utilized 1997 covered employment data for this analysis. O • These percentages are similar to those found in a recent ECO report on industrial lands in the Portland metropolitan area. O Industrial Land in North Tukwila ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 7 Page 8 Figure 3. Change in industrial employment, 1990 -1998 ECONorthwest January 2002 Source: Puget Sound Regional Council, 2001. Note: Shaded areas are Forecast Analysis Zones from PSRC's small area forecasting model. Note that Seattle and the Duwamish industrial area, including North Tukwila, actually lost industrial employment during this period. There are several reasons for this loss: • 1990 was a peak year of employment for Boeing, and after sharp employment declines in from 1991 to 1994, the area added back some, but not all, of those jobs. * Recent reductions in industrial activity in these areas represent the first phases of a transition process. During this transition process old -line industrial uses move out of the area to, in effect, clear the way for new types of industrial uses that will be better able to take advantage of the areas' strengths. * Losses in industrial activity in these areas are the result of industrial users being priced out of the market entirely. * Boeing decentralized, shifting employment to Everett and the Kent Valley. * The apparent loss of industrial employment could be partially definitional: i.e., that the mix of businesses changed to ones that still desire industrial land, but are not classified as industrial uses (e.g., automobile repair). Industrial Land in North Tukwila Within the more recent period spanning 1995 to 1999, industrial employment growth was strong across the Puget Sound region, growing by 52,000 jobs, an average annual growth rate of 3.3 percent per year. A substantial portion of the region's industrial growth during the period was driven by employment increases at Boeing. Of the 52,000 added jobs, 25,000 were added in the aerospace industry alone. Excluding aerospace employment, employment in other industrial sectors grew at an average annual rate of 2.2 percent. Across the region, the relative importance of aerospace employment growth differed among counties. In Pierce and Snohomish Counties, growth in aerospace employment dominated all other industrial activity, accounting for 78 percent of the total growth for the period. In King County, however, industrial growth was much more diversified, with increases in aerospace employment accounting for only 36 percent of total growth. King County's industrial growth enjoyed substantial contributions from air transport industries, wholesale trade, communications, and the manufacturing of non - computer electronic equipment. 3.1.2 TRENDS IN REGIONAL DEMAND FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND The demand for industrial land has been watched closely in recent years by local media. In Seattle, the industrial area surrounding the Duwamish River in the southern portion of the City has received much attention from the City and the media. Land prices in and nearby to Seattle have been bid up by retailers and other users, and many industrial users have reportedly found it difficult to remain at their existing locations. As prices become increasingly expensive, industrial and manufacturing land uses are converted to other uses such as retail stores, office buildings, condominiums, and hotels, all of which can support the higher price of land. For example, before the new baseball stadium was constructed, land zoned industrial to the south of the Kingdome was selling for $12 to $16 per square foot. By 1998, it was selling for $30 per square foot . Land prices throughout many portions of the region rose just as rapidly; the baseball stadium cannot receive all of the blame for this impact. Over the past several years, however, several parcels have been rezoned to accommodate offices and data centers in areas that have long been primarily heavy industrial. We scanned the local media to provide the following sampling of notable conversions to illustrate this trend: • Martin Smith Inc. converted in May of 2000 a 60,000 square foot furniture warehouse west of the former Kingdome into high -tech offices. • Martin Smith maintains plans to convert a seven - plus -acre industrial site into a one - million - square -foot, mixed -use, urban- high -tech campus . • In April of 2000, James Walker sought a master use permit to change 20,800 square feet of warehouse space into office space, plus construct an additional 3,000 square feet of new office space. - 5 DJC, Savelle, "City Ponders Ballpark Bufferzone," 1998. • 6 DJC, Nabbefeld, "A Provident deal for Martin Smith," 2000. DJC, Nabbefeld, "A Provident deal for Martin Smith," 2000. 'land in North Tukwila ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 9 ER MEMEEMEMM "' A .. f.^ ' �?! l;: e+ t!�Y�'7t?U+:X?h. °+rcfY?r.., Wwr�mrr„m,TM...m. i .t __ Page 10 • In December of 2000, Romac, teaming with Trammel Crow Co., applied to convert a former pipe - making plant into a six -story, 100,000- square -foot office building, with an additional 62,500 square feet of data - center space . These conversions speak to several trends happening in industrial real estate, discussed throughout the report: manufacturing companies employ a higher percentage of office jobs; tech companies blur the line between manufacturing and service jobs; and architects cater to warehouse -style development for offices. The trend throughout the region is clear: retail, office, and flex- tech developers are willing to pay enough for industrial land to displace many industrial uses. 3.1.3 FORECAST FOR INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION Our assessment of the national and regional trends in industrial employment that we presented in the previous section is that there will be continued absolute growth in industrial employment, even though the share of employment in industrial sectors (measured as a percent of total employment) may decline more. In the extreme, to respond to a question that Tukwila asked us, we do not interpret the long -run trend of declining shares of employment in manufacturing to mean that demand for industrial land for industrial uses in the U.S. will get small quickly and that, therefore, there will be little demand for industrial land for industrial uses. In this section we look at the Puget Sound region in more detail. In 1997, the Puget Sound Regional Council forecasted that the region would add 480,000 jobs between 2000 and 2020, 62,500 of which would be in those employment sectors that generallyrequire industrial lands. As discussed throughout this report, it is difficult to relate job types and employment sectors by type to demand for land. Demand for land use types can be generalized in terms of employees per square foot, but there is not consistent correlation of employment types to land use types. If, as other studies suggest, 60 -80% of those industrial jobs locate on industrial land, that would be about 40,000 to 50,000 employees. If all that growth were accommodated on vacant land, that would require on the order of 5,000 to 10,000 acres of industrial land. PSRC forecasts that the additional industrial jobs will span the developed portions of the region, concentrated more heavily in the southern portion of Seattle, South King County, and in Everett, where aerospace jobs are concentrated (Figure 4). DJC, "Office Space For Industrial District,' 2000. 9 DJC, Nabbefeld, " Romac May Convert Former Pipe Plant to Data Center, Offices," 2000. 10 Flex -tech space refers to buildings that serve dual purposes of office and light industrial, or office and warehouse. In practice, many realtors include typical warehouse and light industrial buildings when they refer to flex -tech. The intended definition refers to buildings that tenants can reconfigure relatively easily to suit their needs—typically referring to adjusting the amount of the building dedicated to office. Many high -tech related companies prefer this type of building, allowing some areas for assembly, staging, and delivery. C C 11 These forecasts were developed prior to recent changes in the aerospace industry and Boeing. New forecasts are expected in 2002. C ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila I Supply and Demand in the Central Puget Sound Region (1995), summarized analysis of the region's net supply of industrial land and characteristics of major industrial areas, such as location, parcel sizes, price, and infrastructure. In April 2000, the Puget Sound Regional Council published Technical Addendum: Employment, Land Use and Infrastructure Characteristics of Lands Designated as Industrial in Comprehensive Plans, a technical addendum to the Industrial Land report. The Technical Addendum addressed three issues raised in the original report: employment analysis of industrial and non - industrial lands, varying zoning regulations among jurisdictions, and short -term usefulness of industrial lands. The UW/PSRC industrial lands report showed projected demand region -wide for 5,600 to 7,100 acres of industrial land for the period of(1997 to 2020, with the regional supply of vacant or redevelopable land totaling 21,000 acres. Those 21,000 acres include more than 7,000 acres that were not served adequately by infrastructure and transportation accessibility at that time (1995). The study also noted a discrepancy between the location of the supply of industrial land and the areas in which industrial lands are in high demand. The report showed that only 8 percent of the region's net supply of industrial land was located along the industrial corridor from the Duwamish River in Seattle south to Auburn. Tukwila's industrially zoned lands are located in the heart of this corridor. The majority of the net supply (81 percent) was found to be located in Snohomish, Pierce, and Kitsap counties. 3.2.2 OTHER BUILDABLE LAND STUDIES • In 1998, the King County Growth Management Planning Council commissioned a study entitled, "King County Industrial and Commercial Land Capacity." That study found net buildable capacity of approximately 66.3 million square feet of industrial floor area, half of which is on vacant land, and the other half on redevelopable land. Of that total about two- thirds of the area is vacant, and the remaining one -third is redevelopable. In the King County study, the demand side of the industrial lands issue was framed in terms of employment targets. The County and cities have all adopted employment targets as part of the GMA requirements. The study concluded that the combined commercial and industrial capacity (on vacant and redevelopable parcels) was more than double the capacity necessary to meet the employment targets for 2020. The study examined parcel sizes and reported a wide range of parcel sizes available for.industrial uses. It did not make conclusions regarding the adequacy and suitability of parcel sizes. Rather, the conclusions focused on data improvements and future needs of land capacity data. In 1994 the Kitsap Economic Development Council conducted a study of industrial land in Kitsap County. They found that less than 22 of the more than 1800 industrially - zoned acres in Kitsap County were free to be developed." A variety of problems were identified as barriers to development: contamination, lack of infrastructure, wetlands, steep slopes, poor location, lack of services, and increasing prices (again, elevated by competition from retailers who can afford to pay more for the land). In Portland, Oregon, several agencies recently co- sponsored a study similar to that of PSRC's, which ECO helped complete. That study showed similar findings as the PSRC report: while the gross supply of industrial land appeared to meet demand through 2020, only about one -third of the land supply was considered to be ready to develop. This study helps show that the industrial land supply is important throughout the Pacific Northwest. 13 DJC, Scott, "Industrial Land Supply: Is It Later Than We Think ?" 1994. Page 12 ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila Tukwila's context for zoning decisions reaches far beyond city limits or even neighboring areas like Seattle and Kent. 3.2.3 RECENT TRENDS IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION Available evidence suggests that supply constraints are putting pressure on industrial users to move to the north, south, and east of King County's urban center. These supply constraints are manifest in (1) a scarcity of suitable sites, and (2) land values that have increased to a point where traditional industrial uses of the sites are no longer viable. Even in the Kent Valley, which absorbed much of the industrial development of the last decade, virtually all that remains for development are 8- to 10 -acre parcels. 14 Nick Cassino, a broker for Trammell Crow, said that it is very difficult to find a 30 or 40 -acre tract of land. That finding is identical to one in the recent comprehensive industrial land analysis in the Portland area. Brokers like Cassino foresee a future in which the region's growing population will compel several national companies to establish large distribution centers in Kent and Auburn. They predict that each one of these distribution centers could easily demand more than 1.5 million square feet. 3.3 SYNTHESIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND The weight of evidence suggest that the high land prices and dwindling supply of industrial land will continue to lead developers south of Seattle in search of cheaper and more readily available industrial land. According to Nick Cassino, a broker with Trammell Crow, "most of the new industrial construction will occur in Sumner and Fife as they serve as a bridge between the Kent/Aubum Valley and the Fife/Port of Tacoma." ECO's recent experience in Sumner leads us to believe Mr. Cassino's argument has merit. In recent years, the City of Sumner nearly doubled its geographic size by annexing agricultural land and zoning it industrial. Demand for the land has been very high since that time. The Tarragon Corporation is building a two- million- square -foot industrial park complex in Sumner, and has plans for a similar development to follow this one. Sumner is close to Tacoma and provides easy access to SR -167. This access will get even better when a new on -ramp opens in 2003. It is expected that the new on -ramp will stimulate the drive for additional southward development. Some even expect that the trend of development moving to the south could reach as far as Lacey, near Olympia, along Interstate 5. The Pierce County market area is ranked third in the Puget Sound region in terms of industrial building inventory, only surpassed by South King County and Seattle, and followed closely by East King County where the majority of industrial space has been used by high -tech companies. In 1999, more than 150 of the total 201 million square feet of industrial space was located out of Seattle proper. Forty percent of this stock was in South King County alone. The year before, in 1998, net absorption was negative 500,000 14 One notable exception is a 200 -acre parcel that Boeing recently put on the market in the Kent valley. 15 PSBJ, Broberg, "Pure industrial deals flow south of border to Sumner," 2001. 16 DJC, Staff, "Industrial, High -Tech Vacancies Remain Low, Rents Head Higher." 17 PSBJ, Rosenberg, Industrial Market: The South Will Rise Again," 1999. 16 PSBJ, Rosenberg, Industrial Market: The South Will Rise Again," 1999. Page 13 Industrial Land in North Tukwila ECONorthwest January 2002 .. .. . wmrtN3rY�!,..mt I.,..., rz,ziwnnMP=2.1'K:?CG'R?!Y� z , . .. M z _ �..: u. .i'.nu..+..i.+...+w.+... »r...N� ' ' ) E•nx.'lyitf'r1g7PPj;��s'f [� � q� square feet in Seattle, while South King County absorbed 1.5 million square feet. Comparatively, Pierce County and East King County each absorbed just over 600,000 square feet. Between 1997 and 1999 the overall trend in the industrial market appears more or less the same; Seattle had a negative net absorption of 1.2 million square feet, South King absorbed 4 million, Pierce 1.9 million, East King 1.5 million, and Snohomish County more than 700,000. Other areas in the region have also seen increased demand for industrial land. North, in Snohomish County, companies from Seattle and the Eastside continue to search for larger spaces with lower rents. The strength of this trend has reportedly increased since 1995. Snohomish County, however, has seen less industrial influx than south King County and Pierce County due to Snohomish County's strict building codes. Industrial land is hard to come by in Snohomish County. Even though the North End market has good accessibility, located at the convergence of Interstate 5 and Interstate 405, very little land in the area is zoned for industrial uses. Most of the industrial growth in Snohomish County is occurring in two locations: south Everett, including Seaway Center and Paine Field, and the Harbour Pointe area of Mukilteo. The airport authority controls Paine Field, however, so there are more restrictions on land use than at Seaway. Seaway Center will also acquire more space soon when sand - and - gravel mining land is converted into industrial space 2 Industrial land in the central areas of the region is being used increasingly by non- industrial uses. More than any other reason, non - industrial users' greater willingness to pay for those lands appears to drive the displacement of the industrial users from industrial lands. Where unregulated by restrictive zoning, the market for these centrally located lands is shifting to non - industrial uses. At the same time, South King County communities have opened up more land for industrial use and provided industrial companies and developers less expensive alternatives to staying or developing in the Duwamish Corridor. These outlying alternatives have proven to be more attractive to industrial uses than bidding against other commercial uses for the interior lands. The locational advantages of the more centrally located land has not changed, however, and industrial users continue to rank those locations high. That ranking remains high based on access to the freeway system, the Port of Seattle, and rail connections. d ;' 0 20 PSHJ, Taylor "Snohomish County Industrial Market Feels High -tech Pull," 2001. 19 Greater Seattle Industrial Forecast: 1999 published by Kidder Mathews & Segner. Page 14 ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila • Section 4 Industrial Land in North Tukwila lr 4.1 DEMAND: EMPLOYMENT ON LAND IN NORTH TUKWILA The North Tukwila study area, for purposes of this analysis, includes the area within City boundaries north of South 126 Street. Within this study area, our analysis focuses on those parcels zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/ Heavy Industrial (MIC/H), = z Manufacturing Industrial Center/ Light Industrial (MIC/L), and Heavy Industrial (HI). ce g U 4.1.1 CURRENT DEMAND U O In 1999, the North Tukwila study area supported roughly 3,200 "covered" non- w = Boeing jobs, 73 percent of which were in industrial sectors according to our working u definition. Figure 5 shows the location of these jobs. w 0 More than 2,000 of the total non - Boeing jobs were in firms engaged in g manufacturing, with a much smaller portion in the transportation, communication, and utilities sector. In addition, much of the non - industrial commercial activity was in H W industries that served industrial users. Z i I-- O Z h- w w U� 'O N t— w I-- — L L O Z V - . O Z Industrial Land in North Tukwila ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 15 N rti O O Page 18 4.1.2 POTENTIAL FUTURE DEMAND The Puget Sound Regional Council forecasts that, over the 20 -year period spanning 2000 to 2020, the five TAZs that include the North Tukwila study area will see net industrial job growth of 2,700, and overall job growth of 5,700. Nearly all of that forecasted growth is expected to occur in TAZs 330 and 341, which capture the northern and southern ends of the study area respectively. If we assume that the forecasted employment growth will occur in industries that require the large amounts of floor area per employee typically associated with industrial uses (600 square feet per employee), then the PSRC forecasts imply that, in total, the five TAZs will occupy 3.4 million square feet of industrial and commercial floor space. Given current vacancy rates, most of the space will have to be built. If we limit our analysis to only those uses that fall within our identified industrial categories, the demand for additional "industrial" floor area approaches 1.6 million square feet. At an average floor -area ratio of 0.4 (which is on the high side), this translates into a need for 4 million square feet of industrial land (or more than 90 acres). Beyond the demand for industrial uses forecasted by the PSRC's model, we believe that, if one takes into consideration the forces at work in industrial areas to the north in the Seattle Duwamish corridor, a case can be made for even greater levels of demand for Tukwila's industrial lands. As we noted previously, PSRC's forecasts call for strong industrial job growth in Seattle's southern industrial corridor. Recent trends, however, show that many of the areas for which this growth is slated have actually experienced losses in industrial employment. If these trends were to persist, then a couple of different conclusions could follow. First, it could be the case that the PSRC forecasts are at too great a variance with reality and would need to be adjusted. Or, second, if the aggregate forecast is still roughly correct, then the employment growth has to be shifting to other areas. As one of the next most logical places to look for a centrally located industrial site, Tukwila should be well positioned to accommodate at least a potion of this growth. 4.2 SUPPLY: CHARACTERISTICS OF INDUSTRIAL LAND IN NORTH TUKWILA Figure 7 shows the location of vacant industrial land in North Tukwila. Among the points it illustrates is one obvious to people familiar with the area: it is primarily developed, and vacant parcels are scattered throughout it. ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila Industrial Land in North Tukwila Figure 7. Vacant industrial land in study area (color coded by parcel size), 2001 Vacant Industrial Parcels (SqFt) 1,200 - 54,885 54,886 - 133,910 >' f 133,911 - 232,280 232,281 - 554,000 0 Study Area Boundary ® Tukwila City Boundary jai Industrial Parcels Tukwila area parcels Streets Oa Water CAD Source: Puget Sound Regional Council, 2001. 4.2.1 ZONING Roughly 169 tax parcels in North Tukwila (the study area) have an industrial zoning designation. This area has about 1,300 acres of land in parcels (57.1 million square feet) Nearly all of this land (96 %) is zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H); 3.5 %, Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L); and just over .5 %, Heavy Industrial (HI) (Figure 8). ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 19 e G C Page 20 ECONorthwest Figure 8. Current industrial zoning designations in the study area, 2001 Zoning Designations HI MIC /H MIC /L Study Area Boundary i Tukwila City Boundary Tukwila area parcels Streets `..; Water Source: Puget Sound Regional Council, 2001. As described in the City's zoning code, the MIC/H "is intended to provide a major employment area containing heavy or bulk manufacturing and industrial uses, distributive and light manufacturing and industrial uses, and other uses that support those industries." The heavy industrial uses permitted include a variety of manufacturing activities, including the manufacturing and processing of metals, materials (plastics, textiles, etc.), food production, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, electronics, and other traditional manufacturing activities. A range of land uses that could support heavy industrial activity is also allowed, including personal services and eating and drinking places. Offices are allowed if they are associated with another permitted use, intended to provide for office space related to industrial activity. Offices permitted in both the MIC/H January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila 4 The MIC/H and MIC /L zoning designations are similar but not identical. In the MIC /L -zoned areas, some heavier industrial uses are not allowed, such as: manufacturing, processing and/or assembling of chemicals, heavy metals, light metals, z previously processed metals, plastics, textiles, agricultural products, or animal products. Rock -and concrete - related activity is permitted in the MIC /L areas, but not in the MIC/H ;= W or the HI areas. o: g ._I 0 4.2.2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS co p All of the industrial parcels in this area are well served by a network of water _ conduits divided into three districts: Water District 20, Water District 125, and the co LL Tukwila Water District. Eighty percent of the study area is served by the Tukwila w 0 Water district, leaving 9 percent served by Water District 125, and 5 percent by the 2 Seattle Water District. The City's entire service area is currently supplied entirely from the City of Seattle's water system through a long -term purveyor contract. Nearly all of co the water supplied to Tukwila comes from the Cedar River Watershed through the 60- z w inch Cedar River Pipeline No. 4 on the south and the 48 -inch West Seattle supply line on z H the north. The line supplying Tukwila is an 18 -inch pipe the runs underneath East F- p Marginal Way South and draws at a rate of 10,000 gallons per minute. w ~ uj All of the industrial parcels are also well served by three sewer districts: Tukwila v Ca Sewer serves approximately 47 percent of the study area, Val Vue Sewer serves roughly o H 37 percent, and Seattle Sewer serves about 16 percent of the area. The sewer network w consists of at least 30 miles of concrete pipe with some portions of PVC, asbestos = 0 cement, cast iron, and ductile iron mains. The City of Tukwila owns and operates eight (8) sewage lift stations within its sewage collection system. .. z ti (I) In addition to the area's robust water and sewer system, industrial parcels in the study � H area benefit from an extensive network of fiber optics cables. As of July 2001, six z companies (Level 3, 360 Network, Mcleod USA, Metromedia, Williams, ELI, and MCI Worldcom) maintained fiber optic lines in Northern Tukwila. Two lines run south along Interstate 5; two more run along East Marginal Way South; one along Interurban Avenue South; and one runs along the Tukwila International Boulevard. Excellent road capacity serves parcels in the MIC area, providing access to Duwamish industrial areas and the region's freeways. This access creates a comparative advantage over many industrial areas in the region, where regional congestion slows access to important freight and shipping destinations. East Marginal Way South serves the planning area. Between the Boeing Access Road and the City's northern limits, East Marginal Way S. varies between seven and nine travel lanes, with easy access to I -5. Industrial Land in North Tukwila and the MIC /L areas can only be associated with other permitted uses, and not at all in areas zoned Heavy Industrial. ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 21 CO O O O • Mingaranezmwoormror Section 5 Conclusions Page 22 The City of Tukwila asked ECONorthwest for advice on how to respond if either buyers or sellers of industrial property make the case that it should be rezoned to allow non - industrial uses. In particular, the City seeks an answer to the question, "Should the City preserve the industrial zoning and the land for industrial use, or should it rezone the land ?" To that end, the City hired ECONorthwest to look at demand and supply factors related to industrial land, and give an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the industrial zoning. We were asked to give an overview of regional demand and local demand for industrial lands. We presented that overview in this report, and supplemented the overview with a discussion of national and global economic factors that influence and shape the demand for industrial land in Tukwila. In addition, we examined regional employment forecasts and analyzed the supply of industrial land in Tukwila relative to potential industrial land demand based on those employment forecasts. The main points of that analysis are summarized in this section. In addition to that summary, this section includes a final section on issues related to City decisions about zoning. It discusses the implications of competing demand for land currently zoned industrial, and some final thoughts on the value of keeping the land zoned for industrial uses. 5.1 LIKELY DEMAND FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND The share of traditional industrial activity in the nation and in the Puget Sound region has declined in recent years, but it need not continue to decline from today's levels. Depending upon technological, economic, and political events, including foreign economies and exchange rate movements, it is even conceivable that the industrial share of employment could rise in the region in the future. Fundamental to a discussion of demand is a consideration of price. If price is perceived by consumers as very low (relative to their assessment of value), demand will be high. This simple idea, which most consumers and businesses in the U.S. economy understand intuitively, has important implications for the an evaluation of industrial land. The demand for industrial land at current prices for industrial land is high. If those prices rise substantially primarily because of the assessment of developers and businesses that alternative uses (e.g., commercial) will yield a greater return than industrial uses—then the demand by industry for that land decreases. That point has to be understood if one is to understand the evaluation that follows. In short, if public policy (e.g., zoning) constrains the uses of land to a narrow and clearly defined set of industrial uses, then those uses are competing only against themselves for land acquisition, and the value of industrial uses will dictate (and cap) the price of land. The price will also be held lower by the price of cheaper suburban industrial sites that industrial users have as alternatives. In that world, we are saying that employment forecasts and trends in the Duwamish Corridor suggest that demand for industrial land in North Tukwila will remain strong, even with decreases in the forecasted share of industrial employment region -wide. " The City strives to accommodate this demand, which increases the likelihood that industrial users will choose this area. For example, the City reports that it has taken steps to reduce contamination at brownfield sites in order to make them attractive for development. These steps help reduce the cost of land that new users would ordinarily ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila ,..c fi d. x^ � c•, a x : c; a4.* a, "? . ,�,r . � .. ,'�- . w. w,,..,•... ...w..`,�-- ..�....:= .._...:...x .. a.i ^'^..•cC�. ....,...._.....C: � ::5:: ^r 4 ... " .1f2t!'BKY • Industrial Land in North Tukwila incur themselves. Such measures make it easier for new industry to locate in the industrial area. There is, however, a different world we could assume: one in which "industrial" uses are broadly defined in industrial zones, or in which zoning is relatively easy to change. In that world, the price of land in North Tukwila could be strongly affected by the value of that land to commercial users. Earlier parts of the report show the differences in land z value that result. In short, land prices get high enough that many industrial users are not = t= interested. In that world, demand for industrial land in North Tukwila by industrial users w is low: they cannot bid what commercial users can. 6 JU In the first world —the one where zoning limits commercial use of industrial land— v o our analysis of the commercial areas surrounding and including the northern Tukwila study area suggests that industrial land users will require at least an additional 90 acres of - 1-- land by 2020. The land in this area is already incorporated and zoned. As a result, the w 0 forecasted demand, as it materializes, will increase pressure for conversions of surrounding areas currently zoned for non - industrial uses, while at the same time put g upward price pressure on those areas already zoned for industrial uses. j d This analysis is based on the PSRC forecasts of jobs in and around the study area. H w The PSRC forecasts provide a good starting point for this analysis and show that regional z economic growth through 2020 will drive employment growth in the Tukwila area as z O well. We believe that there will be growth in industrial employment provided, among w w other things, that land with suitable attributes (including location and price) is available. U � But (again) availability is ultimately a matter of price. Non - industrial commercial 0 F- land users have shown an ability to pay higher prices for land than many traditional w w manufacturing and industrial users. In absence of zoning, therefore, continued long - run t expansions of the services sectors will cause a shift of industrial land toward non - "-- p industrial uses. That trend is consistent with theory, evidence from studies showing non- z industrial users on industrial land, and recent experience in the Seattle region. O ~ In sum, there will be demand for industrial land from both industrial and non- Z industrial users. Upward pressure on land price may cause industrial users to move farther away from Seattle if the prices of industrial lands reflect commercial prices. This will happen if commercial developers know they can receive (or believe they have a reasonable chance of receiving) variances or zone changes to allow commercial development. Among the questions that the City of Tukwila is asking with this study is "How much industrial land does the City or region need ?" Our general conclusion is that industrial land must accommodate most job growth in "industrial" sectors. It must also accommodate some job growth in "non- industrial" sectors. Given the scarcity of suitable industrial sites in King County's urban core, and given the characteristics of Tukwila's industrial areas, we believe that strong demand should exist for development of Tukwila's available industrial parcels (assuming prevailing zoning and prices). Although the PSRC forecasts strong industrial growth in Seattle's industrial corridor, recent evidence suggests that growth in Seattle will need to occur in the face of increased competition from alternative uses. As the one of the next most logical places to look, Tukwila should be well positioned to accommodate displaced Lf� users. . O O ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 23 5.2 ISSUES RELATED TO REZONING Cities throughout the Puget Sound region should maintain a policy that does not irreversibly reduce the availability of industrial sites. Or, to make the same point from a different direction, by maintaining available industrial sites, the Puget Sound region may be able to retain or attract a disproportionate share of this activity relative to other regions. Although recent trends make it tempting to conclude that the future of the region is in information and other service -based activity, some form of manufacturing activity z will remain an important aspect of the economic base of the region. • z � w Some of today's manufacturing activity looks more like service activity than traditional manufacturing activity. Many manufacturing companies employ an increasing - o percentage of workers in jobs stationed at desks and computers and a decreasing co 0 percentage of traditional assembly workers. Changes in technology, transportation, and communication have increased the number of office workers within industrial companies. -j H Jobs at these companies consist of a higher percentage of engineers, Iogisticians, and 0 Lu administrative staff than in earlier industrial eras. Similarly, robotics and assembly technology advances in manufacturing companies have decreased the number of manual- 5 labor employees necessary, while achieving greater output. U j a These trends have affected the amount of land required by many industrial t- _ companies. Nonetheless, many such enterprises continue to require a large campus, with z H good transportation access, access to housing, etc. These are the same basic needs as their z O heavy industrial predecessors. w w 2 o r'r To some degree, sites can be maintained in a flexibly configurable manner so that 0 :, • sites can be converted, as the market requires, among service and manufacturing 0 D- o (- functions. There is a limit, however, to the extent that this can be done without creating = w settings with incompatible uses. When this happens, the sites can become less attractive to both manufacturing and non - manufacturing uses. "-- z We have prepared and analyzed all of this information to aid the City in deciding v whether to change the existing zoning in the study area, currently zoned primarily MIC/H 0 1 ' designation. We framed the analysis according to the City's request of us: keep the z zoning industrial if there will be a demand for industrial lands for the foreseeable future. This analysis, then, suggests that maintaining the MIC/H designation would continue to serve a valuable role for the future needs of industrial users. The City may wish to consider a range of policy options that we were not asked to consider, but present here for future consideration. We are not making an absolute recommendation here that the City should adopt more regulations of industrial land to protect it from conversion to other uses. Rather, we are making a contingent recommendation: lithe City wants more protection, then these are the kinds of regulations to consider: 21 Earlier parts of the report have described the reasons that the City might choose to protect the industrial land for industrial use.: Protecting the land for manufacturing and industrial uses will continue to provide land for the trade and manufacturing industries, both of which typically provide relatively more stable, family-wage '�- employment, for skilled and lower - skilled workers. Industrial uses are most frequently aligned with export G companies (basic) that bring new revenues into the region, as opposed to shifting resources within the region, more typified by office uses. And, Tukwila already has a substantial commercial base in the Tukwila Urban = Center. O O Page 24 ECONorthwest January 2002 Industrial Land in North Tukwila Industrial Land in North Tukwila • In the MIC/H designations, the enforcement of its restrictive office allowances (only as accessories for companies engaged in heavy industry activity) will reduce the conversion of higher -value office space from squeezing out traditional industrial and manufacturing uses. • The City should closely evaluate the zoning allowances for MIC/H, MIC /L, and C/LI to make sure that current zoning does protect industrial land, while allowing flexibility to go with changes in industries. The evaluation should ensure that the zoning is more performance based, rather than defined by the intensity of land use. The zoning should continue to strive to accommodate those basic industries that generate regulated negative externalities not accepted elsewhere in the City or the region. ECONorthwest January 2002 Page 25 ua.wr; wa x'«as.i,.r�:nv::: »+Want. City of Tukwila STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 26, 2003 NOTIFICATION: Notice published in the Seattle Times on June 13, 2003 FILE NUMBER: L02 -064 (Comprehensive Plan) L02 -065 (Zoning Code) APPLICANT: -' * - City oT Tukwila REQUEST: Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director -: LOCATION: City -wide COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Varies ,f. Amend Comprehensive Plan/Development Regulations for Sensitive Areas to incorporate "Best Available Science" per GMA requirements ZONE DESIGNATION: Varies STAFF: Rebecca Fox ATTACHMENTS: A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Attachment 5 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 FINDINGS VICNITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The City of Tukwila requests amending the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code as necessary to: 1) include "best available science" in developing policies and development regulations that protect the functions and values of critical /sensitive areas as defined in the Growth Management. Act; and 2) give special consideration to preserving or enhancing anadromous fisheries. The requested amendment serves as a "placeholder" until specific policies are developed and presented for consideration. Surrounding Land Uses Environmentally sensitive areas include wetlands, watercourses and steep slopes. They are located throughout Tukwila; in many different land use zones. THRESHOLD REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? Per the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and the King County Countywide Planning Policies, Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan includes a Natural Environment chapter with information about critical and priority areas such as wetlands, watercourses and geologically hazardous areas. TMC 18.45 Sensitive Areas Overlay contains development standards for protecting environmentally sensitive areas. - Since Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1995, the GMA was amended to clarify the state's goals and policies for protecting critical areas functions and values. Per RCW 36.70A.172 (Critical areas Designation and protection —Best available science to be used ), local governments are required to include the "best available science" in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas as defined in the GMA, and must give special consideration to preserving or enhancing anadromous fisheries. Before December 1, 2004, local governments are required to include this information in their comprehensive plans. Work has been underway to review scientific literature, inventory sensitive areas, update slope maps, and integrate new geotechnical and watercourse /wetland information into the GIS mapping system. This "placeholder" amendment will allow Tukwila to proceed with policy development. 2 2. Impacts The amendment will affect environmentally sensitive areas throughout the city. Once the review of "best available science" has been completed, policies will be developed and specific impacts will be known. 3. Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? Amending the Comprehensive Plan is the best means to ensure that the state's requirement for "best available science" and provisions for anadromous fish can be incorporated into Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan policies and Sensitive Areas Ordinance. The review of "best available science" may show that some Comprehensive Plan policies need to be changed. Depending on the extent of the changes that are needed, it could be difficult to change the Sensitive Areas Ordinance without revising Comprehensive Plan policies. 4. Will the proposed changes result in a net benefit to the community ? If not, what result can be expected and wliyl We do not yet know.the. specific changes. that might be needed to the Comprehensive Plan or Sensitive Areas Ordinance. Revised policies and regulations are likely to result in a net benefit to the coi fimnity since the revisions will meet state requirements and will be based on a review of the best available science pertaining to slopes, wetlands and watercourses. Any changes will reflect the most recent thinking. CONCLUSIONS The State of Washington has changed the Growth Management Act. These changes • require Tukwila to incorporate a review of "Best Available Science" and provisions for . anadromous fish into its Sensitive Areas policies and ordinance. Preparing a "placeholder" ordinance is the best means to meet State requirements to ensure that new information is incorporated into policies and regulations pertaining to Sensitive/Critical Areas. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: Approve a general "placeholder" amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which updates the Sensitive Areas/Natural Environment — related policies to reflect changes in the Growth Management Act requirements including consideration of "best available science." During its review, the Planning Commission could: • Recommend approval; • Modify the proposal; • Recommend denial. op . _ After the Planning Commission review, the proposed amendment will be brought before tPJ the City Council for a public hearing and decision. Q O 3 NAME OF PROJECT/DE / ELOPME r N`Ts • Upd -a Zoning Code (as appropriate) pertaining to Sensitive Areas Name: Address: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. City —wide Phone: '/06 —L31 -4683 IVA G. APPHAMLANDUSEAPP\COMPAPPAM 06/:6100 ATTACHMENT A RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA • DEC 2 3 20O2 COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Developme?zrM M JTli � FLAN /ZONING CODE 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Q�'1�i3' ? j ;1,I'; Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPM COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision makinc authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary with the Ciry, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. - . - - • . 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 FAX: 706- 441 -1565 Signature: Date: 12/26/02 rn L() C ci FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P- CPA/P -ZCA , Planner: Rebecca Fox File Number: LUL —Ub) Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DE / ELOPME r N`Ts • Upd -a Zoning Code (as appropriate) pertaining to Sensitive Areas Name: Address: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. City —wide Phone: '/06 —L31 -4683 IVA G. APPHAMLANDUSEAPP\COMPAPPAM 06/:6100 ATTACHMENT A RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA • DEC 2 3 20O2 COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Developme?zrM M JTli � FLAN /ZONING CODE 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Q�'1�i3' ? j ;1,I'; Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPM COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision makinc authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary with the Ciry, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. - . - - • . 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 FAX: 706- 441 -1565 Signature: Date: 12/26/02 rn L() C ci A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: Various, including LDR, TUC, MIC /H Proposed: No change proposed B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: Various, including LDR, TUC, MIC /H No change proposed . � z Proposed: C4 2 J U U co cu J = Existing: Vari r r1PpAnaing nn l nrati nn N F" Proposed: No change proposed w O (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) u. a ` co D. GENERAL DESCRIPT OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: Z � Describe the existing uses l w 1,000 feet in all directions'. from the property or area for Z 0 0 which a change is prgpos &d. Various, depending on location U O N O H W W F tL O .. Z = O ~ C. LAND USE(S): GAAPPHAMLANDUSE,APPGOAPAPP,doc, 06R1/o0 Z A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMA 18.80.050) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a re- designation of your property or a change in existing Plan policies: 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue Q is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? 1 ; w o: ? Per the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and the King County Countywide o Planning Policies, Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan includes a Natural Environment chapter u) w with information about critical and priority areas such as wetlands, watercourses and LU i geologically hazardous areas. Since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1995, the u) u_ 0 GMA has been amended as concerns "critical areas." 2 u.a A new section was added to the GMA that clarified the state's goals and policies for cn d protecting critical areas furrcti6ns = and values. Per; RCW 36.70A.172 (Critical areas— 1- _ Designation and pr9t'ection —Best_ available science to be used ), local governments are z 1- required to include the "best available in developing policies and development w o regulations to p Perect the functions'and values of critical areas as defined in the ? o GMA, ad must give special consideration to preserving or enhancing anadromous o fisheries. ° I– ww U 2. Why is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public u_ o need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? iii z A Comprehensive Plan amendment is the best means to ensure that the state's P i requirement for "best available science" is included in Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan z policies and Sensitive Areas Ordinance. The result of the review for "best available science" is may result in changes to the Comprehensive Plan policies. Depending on the extent of the needed changes, it would be difficult to change the Sensitive Areas Ordinance without revising Comprehensive Plan policies. 3. Why will the proposed changes result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what type of benefit can be expected and why? We do not know the extent of possible changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Revised policies are likely to result in a net benefit to the community since they will be based on a review of the best available science pertaining to slopes, wetlands and watercourses. This review will be incorporated into any new policies, ensuring that they are up -to -date. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (TMC 18.80.010) CD O O O 1. A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; We propose to include "best available science" in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical /sensitive areas as defined in the Growth Management Act and give special consideration to preserving or enhancing anadromous fisheries. IF-= '~ w 2. A A. statement of the anticipated impacts of the change, rt including the geographic area affected and the issues -J o presented by the proposed' change; co 0 The potential amendment will affect environmentally sensitive areas w i throughout the city. Once the content of the "best available science" co w is determined, its policies will be developed and specific impacts will be 2 known. _ g 7 u.¢ U 3. An explanation of why the current comprehensive plan or I w • development. regulations are deficient or should net continue in ? effect; ..: .. Zo In 1995, a new section was added to the Growth Management Act ? m that clarified the state's goals and policies for protecting critical o areas' functions and values. Local governments are required to include o the "best available science" in developing policies and development i 0 regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas as u. o defined in the GMA and must give special consideration to preserving iii Z or enhancing anadromous fisheries. Tukwila must amend • its P. w . Comprehensive Plan to include these requirements. z 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific requirements of the Growth Management Act; Please refer to #3 above. 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide Planning Policies; The proposed amendment complies with Chapter II, Critical Areas, Sections A (Overall Environmental Protection), B (Wetlands Protection), D (Fish and Wildlife Protection), and F (Geologic Hazard Areas.) 6. A statement of what changes, if any, would be required in functional plans (i.e., the City's water, sewer, storm water or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment is adopted; • z cc III 2 Any specific impacts of the proposed amendment on functional plans -J 0 are unknown at this time. Possible revisions to the Natural Environment u) 0 policies might require cnges to the Storm and Surface Water Plan. w i changes U) LL. w 2 7. A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be • a needed to support the proposed change, and how the CO a proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of I- w the City; and .. ? x The specific impacts, if any, of the proposed amendment on capital w o improvements otr :tk capital facilities plans of the City are unknown at this ? o time. c) N O — 0E- 8. A statement of what other changes, if any, are required in i v other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the ITS proposed change. w z Any specific changes to other City plans, regulations or codes are v i.= unknown at this time. o E- z ZONING AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.030) 1. The use qr change in zoning requested shall be in conformity. with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest; Specific changes are unknown at this time. All changes to the Zoning Code will be in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding. No specific development is proposed with this amendment. Rebecca Fox - 10751 - Robb Rezone - Sight Distance Analysis Update Page 1 I From: "Dave Schwegel" <dschwegel @Barghausen.com To: <bshelton @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 6/9/03 3:29PM Subject: 10751 - Robb Rezone - Sight Distance Analysis Update Brian: Barghausen Consulting Engineers /Survey measured the entering sight distance at the Southcenter Blvd /66th Ave S intersection in the City of Tukwila for the above - referenced project based on the drivers eye being 18 feet behind the street (Southcenter Blvd). The measured entering sight distance (looking left east) is 88 feet. Entering Sight Distance requirements are met for 10 feet behind the street. Proposed Sight Distance Enhancement Measures include: (1) Berm excavation (2) Vegetation removal (3) Brick Wall reconstruction Additionally, a No Right Turn on Red sign may be installed. We trust this satisfies your request. Feel free to call, fax, or email if questions..Thank you. David M. Schwegel David M. Schwegel Transportation Engineer Barghausen Consulting Engineers Phone: 425 -656 -7424 Fax: 425 -251 -8782 Email: dschwegel @barghausen.com CC: <rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "hmattson" <hmattson @Barghausen.com >, <file @Barghausen.com> 00 0 N i CO CO N" in • CD fha t44.4. 14 A U G ATTACHMENT H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Robb Rezone Northwest Quadrant of the Southcenter Boulevard/ 66th Avenue South Intersection Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East Willamette Meridian Tukwila, King County, Washington Prepared for: Eric Robb P.O. Box 88510 Tukwila, WA 98188 April 22, 2003 Revised June 6, 2003 Our Job No. 10751 •� CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 - 6222 (425) 251 - 8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 4.0 METHODOLOGY 2 4.1 Trip Generation 4.2 Trip Distribution 4.3 Existing/Projected Traffic Volume 4.4 Level of Service 4.5 Safety 4.6 Sight Distance 4.7 Mitigation 5.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4 5.1 Street Facilities 5.2 Transit Facilities 5.3 Traffic Volumes 5.4 Level of Service 5.5 Safety 5.6 Sight Distance 6.0 2005 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6.1 Traffic Volumes 6.2 Level of Service 7.0 TRIP GENERATION 8.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7 9.0 2005 CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT 7 9.1 Traffic Volumes 9.2 Level of Service 9.3 Mitigation 9.4 Driveway Design 9.5 Access Alternatives 9.6 Potential Site Constraints 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 7 6 TABLE 1 Projected Trip Generation (Office) TABLE 2 Projected Trip Generation (Medical/Dental) TABLE 3 Projected Trip Generation (Retail) TABLE 4 Parking Generation Summary TABLE 5 Trip Distribution Values TABLE 6 Existing and Projected Traffic Volumes (Intersections A to D) TABLE 7 Existing and Projected Traffic Volumes (Intersections E to G) TABLE 8 P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Summary TABLE 9 Accident Summary TABLE 10 Impact Fee Summary FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map • FIGURE 2 Site Plan FIGURE 3 Existing Street Conditions FIGURE 4 2003 Traffic Volumes FIGURE 5 2005 Traffic Volumes FIGURE 6 Trip Distribution FIGURE 7 2005 Traffic Volumes With Project APPENDIX A Traffic Volumes APPENDIX B Action Statistics APPENDIX C Transit Data APPENDIX D WSDOT Annual Traffic Report APPENDIX E Photographs TABLES FIGURES APPENDICES ii 10751.004.doc [DMS/tep] x - :,;,; t;; ; ;4 . •r; 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the 31,926 square foot (0.733 acre) Robb parcel (northwest quadrant of the Southcenter Boulevard/66th Avenue South intersection) to determine the maximum potential impact of its development. 1. The maximum potential impact would be 33 p.m. peak hour trips. 2. All seven analyzed intersections would operate at Level of Service E or better under projected with project conditions, increasing analyzed intersection delay by no more than 0.6 seconds. • 3. Stopping sight distances and westbound entering sight distance comply with AASHTO requirements based on the driver's eye 10 feet from the nearest edge of intersecting roadway and a 40 mile per hour design speed (35 mile per hour posted speed plus five miles per hour). Eastbound entering sight distance is mitigated by the traffic signal. Options for improving sight distance include berm excavation, vegetation removal, and wall reconstruction. If entering sight distance remains a concern, a "No Right on Red" sign may be installed. If safety is a concern with vehicles encroaching on the sidewalk to acquire the required sight distance, a "Watch for Pedestrians" warning sign may be installed. 4. None of the seven analyzed intersections pose accident concerns. 5. The proposed access would be at least 25 feet wide to accommodate a 13 -foot wide entrance lane and a 12 -foot. wide southbound left -thru-right lane. The existing curb cut may be modified to provide this driveway width. 6. A possible access alternative is available to the west at the existing Schneider Family Home parking lot (6510 Southcenter Blvd) provided • written permission is obtained from the owners. 7. The existing access has a grade of approximately 12 percent. Large vehicles (except for an occasional delivery truck) are not expected to use this facility. 8. The calculated potential traffic impact fee could be up to $5,903. 2.0 INTRODUCTION. At the City of Tukwila's request, a Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared to determine the maximum potential impact of developing the 31,926 square foot (0.733 acre) Robb parcel. The Traffic Impact Analysis was revised and the City prepared a May 28, 2003 comment letter requesting additional information on site access, circulation, and sight distance The parcel is located in the Northwest quadrant of the Southcenter Boulevard/66th Avenue South intersection in the City of Tukwila, Washington. In accordance with discussion with the City of Tukwila, this Traffic Impact Analysis contains the following elements in addition to those requested in the City's May 28, 2003 letter: 1. Trip Generation 2. Trip Distribution 3. Existing/Projected Traffic Volume 4. Level of Service 1 10751.004.doc (DMS /tcp] Figure 1 depicts the project location within the Puget Sound vicinity. Figure 2 shows the layout of the 31,926 square foot (0.733 acre) Robb parcel. The three parcel development alternatives are office, medical/dental, and retail. The highest trip - generating alternative would be used for analysis purposes. (, 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS he project site presently consists of residences served by a driveway forming the north leg of the Southcenter Boulevard/66th Avenue South signalized intersection. I' The existing driveway conditions as depicted in the Appendix E photographs are as follows: rtp Driveway Width = 25 feet (wide enough to accommodate a 13 -foot wide inbound lane and a 12 -foot wide left/thru/right exit lane) • Asphalt Surface Grade = 12% (estimated based on observations of the South 178 Street 21 ) percent grade in the City of Tukwila. See App ' E photographs) Cr) 12asoli la41-4A \?1 C C C C 4.0 METHODOLOGY 5. Safety 6. Sight Distance 7. Mitigation Trip Generation Total trips represent all trips that originate or terminate within the development. Pass -by trips are trips already on the street adjacent to the site that make an intermediate stop at the development on their way to a primary destination. Pass -by trips do not involve a diversion from the motorist's travel route. Captured trips are on -site trips completely contained within a mixed -use development that go from one land use to another land use within the development. Diverted link trips are off -site trips that are already on the street network and make a diversion from their travel route to visit the development, as distinguished from pass -by trips which do not involve a travel route diversion. New trips (primary trips) are made for the specific purpose of visiting the development. Off -site trips are trips that originate or terminate off the project site and include pass -by, diverted link, and new trips. Off -site trips are calculated by deducting the captured trips from the total trips. New trips are calculated by deducting the pass -by trips from the off -site trips. 2 10751.004.doc [DMS /tepl Net new trips apply to developments that have an existing trip- generated land use and are calculated by deducting the existing trips from the new trips. Trip Generation is typically calculated based on rates and equations as a function of an independent variable quantity. Options for obtaining trip generation rates and equations include the following: 1. Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th edition (1997). 2. Trip surveys conducted at three to five different sites with a similar land use on 2 or 3 different days, depending on land use. Trip Generation rates and equations are typically used when they are based on a large sample size, have a coefficient of determination greater than or equal to 0.75, and have a standard deviation less than or equal to 110 percent of the rate. A trip survey methodology is desirable when the proposed development land use(s) is(are) not covered by those identified in the Trip Generation, or when the above criteria relating to coefficient of determination, sample size, and standard deviation are not met. The trip survey methodology is also desirable when trip generation is desired for a land use that is more specific than the land use listed in Trip Generation, such as a specific type of high quality sit -down restaurant rather than high quality sit -down restaurants in general. Independent variables serving as a basis for trip generation calculations are selected based on accuracy, projectability, cause for trip, and variation. 4.2 Trip Distribution The Trip Distribution analysis assigns the new trips to the study network based on factors including the following: 1. Clientele expected to use the subject development. 2. The streets and traffic characteristics within the project vicinity. 3. The location of likely trip origins and destinations within the project vicinity and the most convenient travel links that .serve them. 4. The proximity and quantity of employment, recreation, shopping, and residential developments within the vicinity. 4.3 Existing/Projected Traffic Volume Existing Traffic Volumes are obtained through counts conducted at the intersections and street segments of interest. Projected Traffic Volumes are calculated by multiplying the existing traffic volumes by a compounded annual growth factor obtained from historic traffic volumes at or near the streets of interest. The Projected Traffic Volumes are calculated for the horizon year that the project is expected to be operational. 3 10751.004.doc (DMS /tcp] O O • C) Projected Traffic Volumes With - Project are calculated by adding the project - generated traffic volumes from the Trip Distribution Analysis to the Projected Traffic Volumes for the project horizon year. 4.4 Level of Service The Highway Capacity Manual 2000 defines Level of Service as "a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, based on service measures such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, and convenience." Chapter 16 identifies the following Level of Service criteria for signalized intersections as a function of average delay (seconds per vehicle): A. Less than or equal to 10 B. lO to 20 C. 20 to 35 D. 35 to 55 E. 55 to 80 F. Greater than 80 Chapter 17 identifies the following Level of Service criteria for unsignalized intersections as a function of average delay (seconds per vehicle): A. 0 to 10 B. lO to 15 C. to 25 D. 25 to 35 E. 35 to 50 F. Greater than 50 4.5 Safety Accident rates are calculated at intersections and street segments to determine if an accident problem is apparent. Typically accident rates of greater than 2.0 per million entering vehicles at intersections, or 5.0 per million vehicle miles of travel indicate that an accident problem may be apparent and a more in -depth analysis is recommended. Accident histories over a minimum of 3 years are used to calculate accident rates. Additionally, total accidents may be broken down into property damage only (PDO), injury (INJ), and fatality (FAT). 4.6 Sight Distance The 2001 edition of the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets identifies the minimum entering sight distance and stopping sight distance requirements as a function of speed limit. Entering sight distance requirements are necessary to ensure that vehicles leaving a driveway 4 1075 004.doc [DMS /tep] or side street have sufficient visibility of oncoming traffic in applicable directions to perform a desired legal turning maneuver. Stopping sight distance requirements are necessary to ensure that the motorist can perceive a 2- foot -high or higher object in the roadway and bring the vehicle to a full and complete stop to avoid hitting the object. For analysis purposes, site distance is typically evaluated based on the 85 percentile speed. However, in the absence of speed data, design speed assumptions may be made. Typical design speed assumptions include (a) the posted speed limit in miles per hour and (b) posted speed limit plus five miles per hour. 4.7 Mitigation Agencies may assess mitigation fees based on traffic impacts of a proposed development to offset costs associated with accommodating the traffic generated by the development and facilitating the construction of street improvement projects within the project site vicinity. 5.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 5.1 Street Facilities In accordance with discussions with the City of Tukwila, the following seven intersections were analyzed: A. Southcenter Boulevard/53rd Avenue South B. Southcenter Boulevard/Macdam Road South C. Southcenter Boulevard/61'st Avenue South D. Southcenter Boulevard/65th Avenue South — E. Southcenter Boulevard/66th Avenue South — F. Southcenter Boulevard/Interurban Avenue South G. Fort Dent Way/Interurban Avenue South Figure 3 shows lane widths, speed limits, traffic control, and geometric conditions at the above - referenced intersections and surrounding street network. 5.2 Transit Facilities l'IA li Appendix C contains route and timetable information on King County Metro Transit routes serving the Southcenter neighborhood. Routes 124 and 150 run along Southcenter Boulevard, Route 124 runs along 65th Avenue South, and Route 128 runs along Macadam Road South. Transit stops are located within two blocks of the proposed Robb Rezone development. 5.3 Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes were obtained from the City of Tukwila for six of the seven analyzed intersections. The Southcenter Boulevard/Macadam Road South intersection was counted by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., on Thursday, April 17, 2003, for the Macadam Road South volumes. The Southcenter Boulevard through volumes were calculated based on the volumes at the adjacent Southcenter Boulevard/61st Avenue South intersection. The Appendix A traffic counts conducted by Trafficount and Traffic Data Gathering in 2002 were 10751.004,doc [DMS /tep] 5 s cr C C C 1 5.4 Level of Service 5.5 Safety 5.6 Sight Distance converted to 2003 volumes using a growth factor described in Section 6.1 of this report. The 2003 traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4 and Tables 6 and 7. According to Table 8, all seven analyzed intersections currently operate at Level of Service E or better during the p.m. peak hour time period. According to Table 9, no intersections have an accident rate greater than 2.0 accidents per million entering vehicles. While the highest accident rate was recorded at the Southcenter Boulevard/61st Avenue South intersection with a 1.26 accidents per million entering vehicle rate, accidents at this intersection were predominantly property damage only with only 10 injury accidents at this location. No fatality accidents were reported at any of the seven analysis intersections. The Robb Rezone development traffic would be served by a driveway opening onto Southcenter Boulevard in the same location as the existing driveway. The posted speed limit on Southcenter Boulevard is 35 miles per hour. A design speed of 40 miles per hour (posted speed limit plus 5 mph) was used for sight distance analysis purposes. According to the AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (2001), the required intersection stopping sight distances at the Southcenter Blvd/66 Avenue South intersection are 325 feet on both Southcenter' Blvd approaches and 145 feet on the driveway approach. The driveway entering sight distance requirement for southbound right turning vehicles is 385 feet. The following sight distances were measured on Friday, May 2, 2003 and Monday, May 5, 2003 by Barghausen Consulting Engineers Surveying Department based on the driver's eye being set 10 feet back from the nearest edge of intersecting roadway: • Entering Sight Distance for westbound vehicles looking east = 444 feet. • Stopping Sight Distance approaching from the driveway = 193 feet • Stopping Sight Distance approaching from the east = 391 feet Therefore, stopping sight distances and westbound entering sight distance comply with AASHTO requirements for a vehicle who's driver is set 10 feet back from the nearest edge of intersecting roadway and eastbound entering sight distance is mitigated by the traffic signal. If the driver's eye were 18 feet from the nearest edge of intersecting roadway instead of 10 feet, the measured entering sight distance would be less. If 18 feet is in fact the desired setback for measuring entering sight distance to ay.'..edestri . i _• - .. . - ' roachment, and the measure • sig • istances were deficient at this particular, setback, options for ( • addressing- this-deEdio inc u e the following: (D Cr) 1. Put a "No Right on Red" restriction for southbound right turning vehicles exiting the site. 2. Cut back the berm and vegetation to enhance visibility. 3. Rebuild the brick wall on either side of the existing driveway. 4. Install a "Watch for Pedestrians" Warning sign on the southbound approach. aa r; 6 10751.004.doc [DMS /tcp) 6.0 2005 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6.1 Traffic Volumes Appendix D shows traffic volumes along SR -181 near the Strander Boulevard intersection, the closest WSDOT Annual Traffic Report (2002) data available to the subject project and street network. Historic volumes cover between 1998 and 2001. These statistics show 29,000 in 1998 and 31,000 vehicles in 2000, with a sharp drop to 26,000 in vehicles in 2001. However, to ensure conservative analysis, the 1998 and 2000 volumes were used to calculate a 3.39 percent compounded annual growth rate, which served as the basis for the projected traffic volume analysis. 2005 was selected as the horizon year for this project, which is 2 years beyond the current year. Therefore, the traffic volume shown on Figure 5 and Tables 6 and 7 are based on a 2 -year projection. 6.2 Level of Service According to Table 8, all the intersections are expected to operate at Level of Service E or better under projected 2005 without- project conditions. The existing traffic volumes for Intersection `B" (Southcenter Blvd/66 Avenue South) show that no vehicles entered or 'exited the site during the PM peak hour when counts were conducted. If traffic volumes were observed on these approaches, the subject intersection would still be expected to operate at Level of Service "C" with an average delay increase of no more than 0.5 seconds, based on this being the case for the Projected 2005 with Project Level of Service results (see Table 8). 7.0 TRIP GENERATION Maximum potential trip generation was calculated for the three most likely Robb parcel development alternatives, general office building, medical/dental, and retail based on Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, Sixth Edition (1997) rates. According to Table 1, the maximum potential trip generation for a general office building development would be 99 average weekday, 14 a.m. peak hour, and 13 p.m. peak hour trips. According to Table 2, a medical/dental development would have a maximum trip generation potential of 325 average weekday, 22 a.m. peak hour, and 33 p.m. peak hour trips. According to Table 3 a specialty retail development would have a maximum trip generation potential of 271 average weekday, 7 a.m. peak hour, and 17 p.m. peak hour trips. Medical/dental has the highest maximum trip generation potential and was thereby selected for analysis purposes. Maximum potential parking demand was also examined for the three most likely development alternatives. According to Table 4, potential parking demand would range from 26 for an office development to 37 for a medical/dental development based on rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation, 2" Edition (1987). Actual parking demand would likely be lower as the Robb parcel is located on a transit line within two blocks of a transit stop. 10751.004.doc [DMS /tepl rnrN:„Axtamowterh,K_cv « a. yryr 8.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION According to Table 5, a destination analysis was conducted to determine the likely origins and destinations for Robb Rezone development clientele and personnel. A street segment analysis was conducted for determining the most likely street segments that motorists would use to travel between the origins and destinations identified in the destination analysis and the Robb Rezone development. 9.0 2005 CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT 9.1 Traffic Volumes Figure 7 and Tables 6 and 7 show the maximum potential 2005 with project traffic volumes calculated by adding the maximum potential project generated volumes to the base 2005 volumes at each of the seven analyzed intersections. For analysis purposes, it was assumed all vehicles would enter and exit the site at the Southcenter Blvd/66 Avenue South intersection. 9.2 Level of Service According .to Table 8, all the intersections are expected to operate at Level of Service E or better, under 2005 with- project conditions, with the highest trip generating development alternative increasing intersection delay by no more than 0.6 seconds and changing the Level of Service rating at the Southcenter Boulevard/Macadam Road South intersection only. All other intersection Level of Service ratings would remain unchanged from 2005 without project conditions. The Robb Rezone development under its maximum' development potential would therefore have a very minor impact on the seven analyzed intersections and surrounding City of Tukwila street network. 9.3 Mitigation Table 10 identifies the City of Tukwila project list that serves as a basis for impact fee assessment. Seven of the nine projects are completed. Therefore, the Robb Rezone development would only be responsible for contributing to the West Valley / Strander (northbound dual left -turn lanes) and Interurban Bridge (widened for dual left-turns) projects that have not been completed. A maximum of five p.m. peak hour trips would impact the West Valley /Strander intersection, while four would impact the Interurban Bridge intersection. The calculated impact fee, as indicated on Table 10, could be up to $5,903. 9.4 Driveway Design The driveway would be widened when the land use is converted. A formal site, driveway, and circulation plan has not yet been prepared and is awaiting approval of the subject rezone. When the driveway is constructed, the driveway approach width and throat width would be constructed to City of Tukwila Standards. However, photographs of the existing driveway are contained in Appendix E. The driveway (brick wall to brick wall) was measured at approximately 25.5 feet. However, to ensure a conservative analysis, a 25 -foot driveway was GQ assumed. This is sufficient to accommodate a 13 -foot wide inbound lane and a 12 -foot wide O leftlthru/right exit lane. The Table 8 Level of Service Summary indicates the entire signalized intersection would be expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service "C" based on this lane configuration. 8 10751.004.doc (DMS /tepl 9.5 Access Alternatives The primary access to the site would be the north leg of the Southcenter Blvd/66` Ave S. signalized intersection. The developed Schneider Family Home property located at 6510 Southcenter Blvd has a short access easement, depicted in an Appendix E photograph, to the east that connects to the parking lot and could serve as an alternative access to the proposed = Robb development if written permission were obtained from the Schneider Family Home development owners. 6 J 00 9.6 Potential Site Constraints u W According to the Table 4 Parking Generation Summary, the highest trip generating land use, w Medical/Dental Clinic /Office, the average projected parking generation was 37 spaces with a w 0 low -end estimate of 20 spaces. The projected parking demand is likely to be closer to the 2 low -end estimate as the site is located on a major transit route that runs along Southcenter g Blvd., as previously discussed, and transit serves as a convenient alternative for w medical/dental clinic /office clientele. H W z � In order to accommodate the 37 parking spaces and associated drive aisles, the potential i— 0 development may be limited to a smaller building size. A parking and circulation plan would w '— be designed when a future development related permit application is filed with the City of 2 Tukwila Department of Community Development. Only passenger cars and light trucks are 0 expected to use the site, with occasional delivery vehicles. Large trucks equivalent to the o WB -50 and greater are not expected to use the site. = H. U While the existing development containing two residences has a driveway with an entering "- O upgrade of approximately 12 percent, which may pose concerns for vehicles queuing on w Southcenter Blvd behind vehicles slowing to enter the development and negotiate the grade, v = circulation enhancement options include the following: z F' 1. Construct a row parking lot at or near the street level and the building at a much higher level. Provide a stairway to connect the two. 2. Construct two separate levels of row parking lots, and then the building at a higher level than the parking, connecting all components with a stairway. 3. Maintain the 25 -foot throat width at the Southcenter Blvd access and then widen the access to 41 feet to accommodate parallel parking, with the wider cross section starting approximately 20 feet in to the site. The widened access would continue up to the building with the remaining required parking spaces available in a row parking lot at the building level. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared to determine the maximum potential impact of developing the 31,926 square foot (0.733 acre) Robb parcel located in the northwest quadrant of the Souihcenter Boulevard/66th Avenue South intersection in the City of Tukwila, Washington. The, maximum trip generation potential is 325 average weekday, 22 a.m. peak hour, and 33 p.m. peak hour trips. All seven analyzed intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E or better, increasing analyzed intersection delay by no more than 0.6 seconds. AASHTO entering and stopping sight distance requirements would be met for the proposed driveway located at the Southcenter Boulevard/66th Avenue South intersection based on the driver's eye set 10 feet back 9 : Y� �'.nK.K'n { �': 7'`�.l`�,.?;t•'Y,NE^q"".:4WS`t@ 10751.004.doc [DMS /tep] O CJ O O O from Southcenter Blvd. Accident rates are acceptable at all seven analyzed intersections. The calculated impact fee could be up to $5,903. The existing 25 -foot access throat width could be maintained to accommodate a 13 -foot wide entrance lane and a 12 -foot wide left/thru/right exit lane. Sight distance may be enhanced through berm excavation and vegetation removal. Safety enhancements related to sight distance include "No Right on Red" and "Watch for Pedestrians" signage to alleviate any safety concerns generated by motorists encroaching on the sidewalk to obtain the necessary sight distance. Circulation enhancement alternatives in lieu of motorists slowing traffic while entering at a 12 percent upgrade include (a) parking on a lower level with the building on an upper level, (b) parking on two levels and the building on a third level, and (c) an extra wide curved access driveway to accommodate parallel parking while providing a row parking lot on top adjacent to the building. Questions concerning this Traffic Impact Analysis may be directed to Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., Traffic Engineering Department, via telephone: (425) 656 -7424, facsimile: (425) 251 -8782, or e-mail: dschwegel @barghausen.com. 10 10751.004.doc [DMS/tep] i Fi 11.01 50 49 99 50% 50% 0% 0 0 0 50 49 99 0% 0 0 0 50 49 99 2 11 13 1.56 13 1 14 1.49 17% 83% 88% 12% 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 2 11 13 13 1 14 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 2 11 13 13 1 14 LAND USE SIZE X UNITS PROPOSED: General Office Building (710) Enter / Exit % Captured Trips (2) Subtotal (oft -site trips) Pass -By Trips (2) New Restaurant Trips EXISTING: No Existing Land Use TOTAL NEW TRIPS Remarks: (1) Per ITE Trip Generation Sixth Edition (1971 (2) Per ITE Tri p Generatl Handbook (March 200,1 00010]. 9.000 1000 sqare feet gross floor area TABLE 1 - PROJECTED TRIP GENERATION (OFFICE) Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job #: 10751 June 6, 2003 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIPS AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS AVERAGE RATE 1 ENTER EXIT TOTAL AVERAGE RATE (1 O PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (TJ ENTER EXIT TOTAL AVERAGE RATE 1) ENTER EXIT TOTAL -.�.a '�`'= 'ti.� c3`��; T: > tri3�- :i >� ? -i3 •..: ., .. • ... 2 .: •••• 11 13 ,.�••- yc,e i .i.^e!x .Sl: 'rs R .. i0 4 9 99 �. �,.. _ 13 1 14 50 49 Prepared By Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ooaioz TABLE 2 - PROJECTED TRIP GENERATION (MEDICAL/DENTAL) Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job N: 10751 (June 6, 2003) LAND USE SIZE (X) UNITS 2.43 18 4 22 80% 20% 0% 0 0 0 18 4 22 0% 0 0 0 18 4 22 tii�'�.r�l.'w � -t 'y(a.1.;r::•i?. �_.r<� .. .. PROPOSED: Medical- Dental Office Building (720) Enter / Exit % Captured Trips (2) Subtotal (off-site trips) Pass -By Trips (2) New Restaurant Trips EXISTING: No Existing Land Use ., 9.000 1000 sqare feet gross floor area TOTAL NEW TRIPS AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIPS (n AVERAGE RATE (1) ENTER EXIT TOTAL 36.13 163 162 325 50% 50% 0% 0 0 0 163 162 325 0% 0 0 0 163 162 325 163 162 325 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (T) AVERAGE RATE (1) ENTER EXIT TOTAL 18 4 22 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (T) AVERAGE RATE (1) ENTER EXIT TOTAL 3.66 9 24 33 27% 73% 0% 0 0 0 9 24 33 0% 0 0 0 9 24 33 • 9 24 33 Remarks• (1) Per ITE Trio Generation Sixth Edition (19971 (2) Per ITE Trio Generation Handbook (March. 20011 Prepared By Barghausen Consulting Engineers. Inc. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 000103 • s1 • TABLE 3 - PROJECTED TRIP GENERATION (RETAIL) Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job #:10751 (June 6, 2003) LAND USE SIZE (X) UNITS PROPOSED: Specialty Retail Center (814) 9.000 1000 sore Enter / Exit % feet gross Captured Trips (2) leasable Subtotal (off-site trips) area Pass -By Trips (2) New Restaurant Trips EXISTING: No Existing Land Use TOTAL NEW TRIPS AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIPS (T) AVERAGE RATE (1) ENTER EXIT TOTAL 40.67 183 183 366 50% 50% 0% 0 0 0 183 183 366 26% 48 47 95 135 136 271 . _,+` ;'t�:cy;:;ea:;:.iK = :�'.:L4.r,''.�izi:+"ii:. 135 136 271 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (T) AVERAGE RATE (3) ENTER EXIT TOTAL 0.98 6 3 9 61% 39% 0% 0 0 0 6 3 9 26% 1 1 2 5 2 7 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (T) AVERAGE RATE (1) ENTER EXIT TOTAL 2.59 10 13 23 43% 57% 0% 0 0 0 10 13 23 26% 3 3 6 7 10 17 5 2 7 7 10 17 Remarks: k (1) Per ITE Trio Generation Sixth Edition (1997) (2) Per ITE Trio Generation Handbook (March. 20011. Trip Generation Handbook does not have a pass -by rate for Specialty Retail. Therefore, the related Shopping Center (820) pass -by rate was used. (3) AM Peak Hour Rate = Weekday Rate • (AM Shopping CenterlWeekday Shopping Center) = 40.67' (1.03/42.92) = 0.98 Prepared By Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 1 • o o 0 to TABLE 4- PARKING GENERATION SUMMARY Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job #: 10751 (June 6, 2003) PROJECTED PARKING Land Use Code 711/716 630 Low GENERATION Average High Description General Office Building Medical/Dental Clinic/Office 820-828 Shopping Center • PARKING GENERATION RATE (1) Low Average High 0.75 2.22 2.79 4.1 1 1.02 3.23 32.29 9.67 6.17 26 37 7 20 10 30 291 88 56 STUDY CHARACTERISTICS (1) Standard Number Average Deviation of Studies Size (KSF) -1.20 207 40 141 2.25 1.39 168 23 635 Building Size (KSF) = 9.000 Remarks: (1) Per Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation, 2nd Edition (1987) Prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 000105 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. TABLE 5 - TRIP DISTRIBUTION VALUES • Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job #: 10751 (June 6, 2003) I. Destination Analysis: ' Destination Percent I Enter Percent Exit Average Weekday _ PM Peak Enter Hour Exit (1) Renton 20% 20% 65 2 5 4 SeaTac, Burien 15% 15% 48 1 (2) Federal Way, Tacoma, South 10% 10% 33 1 2 (3) Southcenter, Kent 15% 15% 49 1 4 (4) Fairwood, E. Kent, Southeast 15% 15% 49 1 4 2 (5) Bellevue, Northeast 10% _ 10% 33 1 (6) Seattle, Northwest via 1 -5 10% 10% 32 1 2 1 (7) (8) Seattle, Northwest via Interurban 5% 5% 16 1 100% 100% 325 9 24 U. Street Segment Analysis; Street Segment • Percent Enter Percent Exit Average Weekday PM Peak Enter Hour Exit '(A) Southcenter Blvd. SW, West of Robb Rezone (7) + (2) + (3 enter) 35% 25% 114 3 6 Southcenter Blvd. SW, West of Macadam (7) + (2) + (3 enter) 35% 25% 114 3 6 (B) Southcenter Blvd. SW, West of 1 -5 (2) 15% 15% 48 1 4 (C) 1 -5 North of Southcenter Blvd. SW (7) 10% 10% 33 1 2 (D) 66th Avenue S. Across 1 -405 (4) + (6 exit) 15% 25% 48 2 6 (E) Southcenter Blvd. SW, East of Robb Rezone (1) + (5) + (8) + (3 exit) 40% 50% 130 4 12 (F) Interurban Ave. S., North of Southcenter Blvd. SW (8) + (6 enter) + (3 exit) 15% 15% - 49 1 _ (G) Grady Way S. (1) 20% 20% 65 2 5 (H) (I) West Valley Highway South of Southcenter Blvd. SW (5) 15% 15% 49 1 4 _ .. ::. ,. ..:_ :., . �. 325 � ... . ^-- __ar_— A.....1..,.... /So..... T.hln 71• i I - 9 24 000105 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Intersection Movement & Direction Volumes 2002 PM Peak Existing Volumes 2003 PM Peak (1) Projected Volumes w/o Project, 2005 . PM Peak (2) Project Generated Volumes (3) Projected Volumes wl Project, 2005 PM Peak (4) GROWTH RATE: 3.39% (5) intersection "A" Southcenter Blvd/ 53rd Ave. S. ' Thursday • 10/17/2002 4 :45 - 5:45 PM Trafficount, Inc. sbrt 200 207 221 0 221 sbth 12 12 13 0 13 Horizon yr - Current yr: 2 sblt 1024 1059 1132 1 1133 wbrt 0 0 0 0 0 wbth 566 585 625 4 629 . wblt 41 42 45 0 45 nbrt 53 55 59 0 59 nbth 0 0 0 0 0 nbtt 24 25 27 0 27 ebrt 27 •28 30 0 30 ebth 462 478 511 1 512 eblt 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection "B" Southcenter Blvd/ Macadam Rd. S. • Thursday 4/17/2003 Barghausen Thursday 4/11/2002 4:15 -5:15 PM Traffic Data Gathering sbrt 32 34 0 34 sbth 0 0 0 0 sblt 94 100 0 100 wbrt 165 176 0 176 wbth 1716 1774 1896 6 1902 wbrt 0 0 0 0 nbrt 0 0 0 0 nbth 0 0 0 0 nblt 0 0 0 0 ebrt 0 0 0 0 ebth 2079 2149 2297 3 2300 eblt 150 160 • 0 160 Intersection "C" Southcenter Blvd/ 61st Ave. S. Thursday 4/11/2002 4 :15 -5:15 PM Traffic Data Gathering sbrt 0 0 0 0 0 sbth 0 0 0 0 0 sblt 0 0 0 0 0 wbrt 0 0 0 0 0 wbth 741 766 819 6 825 whit 200 207 221 0 221 nbrt 71 73 78 0 78 nbth 0 0 0 0 0 nblt 975 1008 1078 0 1078 ebrt 1421 1469 1570 0 1570 ebth 658 680 727 3 730 ebit 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection "D" Southcenter Blvd/ 65th Ave. S. Monday 5/13/2002 4:45 to 5:45 PM Traffic Data Gathering sbrt 48 50 53 0 53 sbth 0 0 0 0 0 sblt 83 86 92 0 92 wbrt 93 96 103 0 103 wbth 740 765 818 6 824 wbrt 0 0 0 0 0 nbrt 0 0 0 0 0 nbth 0 0 0 0 0 nblt 0 0 0 0 0 ebrt • 0 0 0 0 0 ebth 404 418 447 3 450 ebit 60 62 66 0 66 Remarks: (1) From Figure 4 . (2) From Figure 5 (3) From Figure 6 (4) From Figure 7 • (5) From Appendix D: WSDOT Annual Traffic Report (2001) Total Entering Volumes: Intersection A Intersection B Intersection C intersection D 2491 2663 6 2669 4364 4663 9 4672 4203 4493 9 4502 1477 1579 9 1588 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Table 6 - Existing & Projected Traffic Volumes (Intersections A to D) 10751 - Robb Rezone (June 6, 2003) xnt4 r' ,:«weer'�,�ztsrFF *fir 6/6/2003 T6.xls Intersection Movement & Direction Volumes 2002 PM Peak Existing Volumes 2003 PM Peak (1) Projected Volumes w/o Project, 2005 PM Peak (2) Project Generated Volumes (3) Projected Volumes w/ Project, 2005 PM Peak (4) GROWTH RATE: 3.39% (5) Intersection "E" Southcenter Blvd/ 66th Ave. S. (Site Access) Thursday 4/11/2002 4 :30 -5:30 PM . Traffic Data Gathering . sbrt 0 0 0 6 6 sbth 0 0 0 6 6 Horizon yr - Current yr: 2 sbit 0 0 0 12 12 wbrt 0 0 - 0 4 4 wbth 701 725 775 0 775 wblt 579 599 640 0 640 nbrt 640 662 708 0 708 nbth 0 0 0 2 2 nbit 249 257 275 0 275 ebrt 91 94 100 0 100 ebth 585 605 647 0 647 eblt 0 0 0 3 3 Intersection "F" Southcenter Blvd/ interurban Ave. S. Wednesday 4/3/2002 4:30 -5 :30 PM Traffic Data Gathering sbrt 130 134 143 1 144 sbth 659 681 728 0 728 sbit 244 252 269 0 269 wbrt 607 628 671 0 671 wbth 770 796 851 2 853 wblt 305 • 315 337 0 337 nbrt 486 502 537 0 537 nbth 568 587 627 0 627 nbit 178 184 197 1 198 ebrt 161 166 177 4 181 ebth 729 754 806 5 811 obit 154 159 170 3 173 Intersection "G" Fort Dent Way/ Interurban Ave. S. Thursday 4/18/2002 4:45 -5:45 PM Traffic Data Gathering sbrt 306 316 338 0 338 sbth 959 • • 992 1060 1 1061 sbit 47 49 52 0 52 wbrt 14 14 15 0 15 wbth 6 6 6 0 6 wblt 11 11 12 0 12 nbrt 11 11 12 0 12 nbth 972 1005 1074 1 1075 nbit 491 508 543 2 545 ebrt 377 390 417 0 417 ebth 9 9 10 0 10 obit 310 321 • 343 0 343 Remarks: (1) From Figure 4 (2) From Figure 5 (3) From Figure 6 (4) From Figure 7 (5) From Appendix 0: WSDOT Annual Traffic Report (2001) Total Entering Volumes: Intersection E intersection F Intersection G . 2942• 31.45 33 3178 5158 5513 16 5529 3632 3882 4 3886 Table 7- Existing & Projected Traffic Volumes (Intersections E to G) 10751 - Robb Rezone (June 6, 2003) l Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 6/6/2003 T7.xls N 0 C C. C 000108 r. TABLE 8 - PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY BCE Job #: 10751 (June 6, 2003) • Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) Intersection A B C D E F G Southcenter Blvd /53rd Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/Macadam Rd. S. Southcenter Blvd/61 st Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/65th Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/66th Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/Interurban Ave. S. Fort Dent Way /Interurban Ave. S. Control Type S S S TWS S S Time Period 1 Existing 2003 LOS Delay Rating (sec /veh) B C C C C E 19.2 25.1 33.5 16.5 30.0 57 46.7 Time Period 2 Projected 2005 LOS Delay Rating (sec /veh) B C C C C E D 19.9 34.6 34.2 17.9 30.2 57.6 49.8 Time Period 3 Projected 2005 with Project LOS Delay Rating (sec /veh) B D C C C E D 19.9 35.2 34.2 18.0 30.7 57.7 49.8 Remarks: Calculations are based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Edition 5: Signal (Based on Overall Intersection) TWS: Two Way Stop (Based on Worst Case Movement) NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 000.1.00. TABLE 9 - ACCIDENT SUMMARY Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job #: 10751 (June 6, 2003) Intersection A B C D F G Southcenter Blvd/53rd Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/Macadam Rd. S. Southcenter Blvd/61 st Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/65th Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/66th Ave. S. Southcenter Blvd/Interurban Ave. S. Fort Dent Way /Interurban Ave. S. Accident Quantity 2000 2001 2002 Total 10 2 10 22 1 2 9 12 2 12 17 0 3 6 17 6 18 19 1 4 16 14 40 58 2 9 31 43 Entering Volume 2491 4390 4203 1477 2942 5158 3632 Quantity by Type FAT I PDO Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 22 1 1 9 15 6 30 36 . 1 8 22 10 40 58 2 9 31 Rate by Type (MEV) FAT INJ PDO Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.21 0.48 0.06 0.03 0.16 0.22 0.62 0.78 0.06 0.25 0.39 0.37 0.83 1.26 0.12 0.28 0.55 28 0.00 0.38 0.70 1.08 Remarks: MEV: Per Million Entering Vehicles FAT: Fatality INJ: Injury PDO: Property Damage Only Entering Volume: Based on 2003 PM Peak Hour. See T 6 and 7 K- Factor (Average Weekday Volume /PM Peak Hour Volume) = 10 Accident Quantity and Quantity by Type provided by City of Tukwile NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 000110 ` . TABLE 10 - IMPACT FEE SUMMARY Robb Rezone (Tukwila, Washington) BCE Job #:10751 (June 6, 2003) Project (1) Southcenter /Strander (widen for WB Left Turns) (2) Andover Pk E/ Strander (widen for n/s Left Turns) (3) Andover Pk W /Strander (widen for n/s Left Turns) (4) S. 180th St/SR -181 (widen n/s and e/w) (5) Andover Pk E/Baker (n/s lefts, signal) (6) Andover Pk W /Mlnkler (n/s lefts, signal) (7) Southcenter Pkwy /168 (signal) (8) W Valley /Strander (NB dual left turn lanes) (9) Interurban Bridge (widen for dual lefts) Total Improvement Cost $ 134,000.00 $ 94,000.00 $ 296,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 1,250,000.00 Cost per PM Peak Hour Trip 140.00 135.00 317.00 475.00 377.00 392.00 278.00 283.00 $ 1,122.00 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed In- Progress Robb Rezone Impact (PM Peak Hour Trips) 5 Impact Fee $ 1,415.00 In- Progress 4 $ 4,488.00 Total $ 5,903.00 Remarks: Total Impact fee is based on projects which have not been completed. Project List, Improvements Cost, Status, and Per Trip Costs were provided by City of Tukwila. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. r:... o.A1 \ 10751\ exhibit \traffic41703 \10751x1.dwq Date /Time: 04/17/2003 13:54 Scale: 1 =40 bwolloston Xrefs: NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 1w I.e PAICCoo .Von. \«w \li•M'• -o.o ar/r 0.1/11/ 2033 14M sale 1•.0 I. ,. in& ■10/310. FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN 1140 WASHNCITON ROW FiEZOPE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS —116B2119%221.2213121011111121=365211212,1011--. JUTE 8, 2009 Z ~ W Q: 6 6 JU 00 LI) 0 LLI J WO 2 c d = W Z � I- co Z 1- W • W 0 O - O I- W W I H 0 LL O Z W O ▪ ~ Z SOUTHCENTER MALL D Z 3 o 7 C) mm STRANDER BLVD. 0 �2 8L/60 D S 151st S 217g ST 2L/25 s 2L/35 A S �� 1 �. B S � / S 153rd S G� �LRPO� W'( S S S 2 L/ 15 , \j5 o 4L/60 N TFR C S � - VD SW ro/■ 'Arrow 161/ ft 7 S ITE 2 =-, ►n BAKER BLVD. 10L/60 A: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 53rd AVE. S. B: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ MACADAM ROAD S. C: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 61st AVENUE S. D: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 65th AVENUE S. E: SOUTHCENTER BLVD. / 66th AVENUE S. F: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ INTERURBAN AVENUE S G: FORT DENT WAY/ INTERURBAN AVENUE S • FIGURE 3 EXISTING STREET CONDITIONS LEGEND: # OF LANES XL TRAFFIC DIRECTION 5L/35 STOP SIGN I° 2 -‘ POSTED SPEED LIMIT XMPH -)z) TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL O v� SL /25 ROM REZONE TRAFFIC L1PACT ANALYSIS 5L/40 CD CD JUE 6, 2003 TUKM.AA, WAeTCN R7ARiry. let flla1 ccsJsI! ll9Q JOB Nn. 10751 - - '4 ' z Q I- w cl O 0 co o - _ w • 0 2 g 171 u C "±- w z1.— w • w U o 1- w w wU) 0 O~ z MIS 0 A: SOUTHCENTER • BLVD./ 53rd AVE. S. B: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ MACADAM ROAD S. C: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 61st AVENUE S. D: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 65th AVENUE S. E: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 66th AVENUE S. F: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ INTERURBAN AVENUE S G: FORT DENT WAY/ INTERURBAN AVENUE S FIGURE 4 2003 TRAFFIC VOLUMES cn SOU Z il S 151st 152nd ST ST S 152nd PL S 153rd G B ST fPEA:°: p k_ sr l 5N j � q BAKER BLVD. D SOUTHCENTER MALL o o STRANDER BLVD. mm .. '+ 3 '' .'�-,'ft4M..ELT2 ,K'ry,.. 7".it u.. , rr f, `'"T . -, +. i7c:" LEGEND: PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME, Y - cf‘ (VEHICLES PER HOUR) vo TUCWLA, WASHN TON ROBB REZONE TAAFRC IMPACT ANALYE1S G S JUNE 6, 2003 ^ t .�w� �{' �, t�' ��L�; NR^J .`fw!'"":3'?Swr.!y°rz'!N`+;'!O ;r f' .. ��'"�,1 :M:� . ..�. .. a. L:`��v.'o: +' ✓f1 +� N a) X 0 0 .0 0 0 hi 0 U N M O O N 0 E I- a) 0 0 3 x N 0 M 0 N U O L .0 x a) 0 0 0 0 0 U- cn 3D 0 N SOUTHCENTER MALL ?K` ( SITE BAKER BLVD. D 3D STRANDER m Z m 3D Fip NTS D S 151st S 152nd 1152nd ST (5 7 2. k B S 153rd ST �F G � .( W't S , N r ER C � ^ E /y- RPO LC) 10,1 Mt, 14 6.11 iviL111.11r A: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 53rd AVE. S. B: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ MACADAM ROAD S. C: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 61st AVENUE S. D: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 65th AVENUE S. SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 66th AVENUE S. F: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ INTERURBAN AVENUE S G: FORT DENT WAY/ INTERURBAN AVENUE S FIGURE 5 2005 TRAFFIC VOLUMES .% PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME Y (VEHICLES PER HOUR) BLVD. arc 6 47—. 100-, F � �671 TU(1NLA WASI-3IOTON LEGEND: ROBS FEZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS �.y G c' a JUNE 6, 2003 N) 0 0 N N 0 I- a 0 UD N 0 0 N. U v r x N 0 0 0 0 0 6 a) • Nrrs TO /FROM % Q1 RENTON (20 Q2 SEA —TAC BURIEN (15 %) Q3 FEDERAL WAY, TACOMA, S. (10% ® SOUTH ENTER, KENT (15 %) Q5 FAIRWOOD, • E. KENT, SE (15 %) ® BELLEVUE, NORTHEAST (10 %) ® SEATTLE, NORTHWEST VIA 1 -5 ® SEATTLE, NORTHWEST VIA INTERURBAN (5%) INTERSECTION: Fr 0 % 4 SOUTHCENTER MALL 2 PKWY SITE BAKER BLVD. D STRANDER BLVD. C D m 0 A: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 53rd AVE. S. B: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ MACADAM ROAD S. C� SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 61st AVENUE S. D: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 65th AVENUE S. E: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 66th AVENUE S. F: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ INTERURBAN AVENUE S G: FORT DENT WAY/ INTERURBAN AVENUE S i L 152nd T S 152nd PL TRIP DISTRIBUTION :k* o FIGURE 6 S 9L LEGEND: PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME • ® (VEHICLES PER HOUR) Y S 151st ST S 153rd G ST F 1 � e \rim: j %) TU(WLA, WASFINCITON RoBB REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALY86 O S o'3 TRIP GENERATION: PM IN: 9 PM OUT: 24 PM TOTAL: 33 WEEKDAY: 325 JUNE 6, 2003 X 0 ..r N 0 .0 0 O N O Pdrs . A: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 53rd AVE. S. B: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ MACADAM ROAD S. C: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 61st AVENUE S. D: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 65th AVENUE S. } ., .E: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ 66th AVENUE S. F: SOUTHCENTER BLVD./ INTERURBAN AVENUE S G: FORT DENT WAY/ INTERURBAN AVENUE S FIGURE 7 2005 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT LEGEND: PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME (VEHICLES PER HOUR) , v SOUTHCENTER MALL BAKER BLVD. 'D D Z 2) o 0 mm STRANDER BLVD. Rp,O C) 0 a S 151st S 152nd ST ST O S 152nd A , PL S 153rd G �, B ST , 6 /• N TFR C ■trio/ ■1411-1;1. 414 PK` SrfE D �' °N X124 4 66 1 50--O e 0 7, TUKWLA, WA2 *1QTON C ROBB REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Y Q N O ME 6, 2003 ° N- x 0 0 N- 7 0 i 0 :E X .U) N- 0 0 0 0 0 y NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • . ' tTh L) TRAFF7C DATA GATHERING -. I.... • TURNINtMOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 - 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:4514e T 5:45 PM Southcenter Boulevard t 0.1 t ‘. 1 . 1-■ 788 I 464 60 404 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1N Alr OUT 1,428 1,428 -COUNTED BY: JC 284 Tukwila, WA ..Southcenter Boulevard 833 I 487 HV 3% SB NB WB EB INTRS. 4N/A 2% 3% 2% PHF 0.86 #N/A 0.89 0.94 0.93 , HV . = Heavy Vehicles • • 7141r = Peak Hour Factor South6644,13oulevard 65th Ave S. DATE OF COUNT: Tue. 4/16/02 CN REDUCED BY: TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 - 6:00 PM I .••• DATE OF REDUCTION: Mon. 5/13/02 .. WEATHER: Rain LOCATION: Tukwila, WA ..�. -. L,1 TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUNMMAllY --:PREPARED BY: TDG • *.P rierm ?-'. 'Y4`n 3 ,' I 'MN4Fa'N P.1, :i'.�,.-,a, !P, trAl e,,, t?v 'T ; : fie!;. t.'Mnq. o,..r mv,...T.rsi4.: ;i ?m,tV, ?Yt S510MM, 7 Tue. 4/16/2002 Tue. 4/9/2002 TIME Southcenter Boulevard @ 65th Avenue S Tukwila International Blvd © S 160th Street INTERVAL 65th Avenue S Southcenter Boulevard Tuk International Blvd S 160th Street ENDING AT North Leg Southcenter Boulevard East Leg West Leg North Leg South Leg East Leg West Leg 7:15 AM o South Leg 0 1 0 0 1 0 7:30 AM o 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7:45 AM 3 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 2 . .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM a 1 . 2 0 0 3 0 0 8:30 AM 0 " 2 a 0 1 0 0 0 } 8:45 AM o • ': 0 2 p 0 0 0 9:00 AM o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 5 0 2 3 1 5 1 0 LOCATION: Tukwila, WA ..�. -. L,1 TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUNMMAllY --:PREPARED BY: TDG • *.P rierm ?-'. 'Y4`n 3 ,' I 'MN4Fa'N P.1, :i'.�,.-,a, !P, trAl e,,, t?v 'T ; : fie!;. t.'Mnq. o,..r mv,...T.rsi4.: ;i ?m,tV, ?Yt S510MM, • • • - T • • - • ' • Tue. 419 /2002• TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT Southcenter Boulevard @ 65th Avenue S Tukwila International Blvd 0 S 160th Street 65th Avenue S Southcenter Boulevard International Blvd S 160th Street North Leg • East Leg West Leg , North Leg South Leg East Leg West Leg 4:15 PM o .. 0 0 0 1 1 0 4:30 PM o .• 1 0 3 0 1 2 4:45 PM 1 .... 0 0 1. 1 • 0 2 5:00 PM o .. " 2 0 '. 0 4 4 0 . 5:15 PM 0 • . . o o •• o o 1 0 5:30 PM 2 1 0 1 5 0 0 5:45 PM • o 0 0 0 o 4 0 I- 6:00 PM o o 0 0 0 0 1 Total 3 0 _ 4 0 5 11 11 5 , LOCATION: Tukwila, WA ..�. -. L,1 TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUNMMAllY --:PREPARED BY: TDG • *.P rierm ?-'. 'Y4`n 3 ,' I 'MN4Fa'N P.1, :i'.�,.-,a, !P, trAl e,,, t?v 'T ; : fie!;. t.'Mnq. o,..r mv,...T.rsi4.: ;i ?m,tV, ?Yt S510MM, INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 3,513 OUT • 3,513 I-405 NB Ramps A Cr] rn 803 I 696 I REDUCED BY: CN DATE: Mon. 5/13/02 • TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 - 6 :00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM TO 5:45 PM COUNTED BY: JH • • • 1 1,312 308 1 959 West Valley highway @ 1 -405 NB Ramps Tukwila, WA 2,608 47 1,296 S 156th Street ' 14 . 11 8 31 1 67 SS NS we ER INTRS. HV 4% 2% 0% 5% 3% PHF 0.86 0.92 0.78 0.91 0.93 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor :DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 4/18/02 :TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 - 6:00 PM WEATHER: Overcast • z Q I- ~ w tr 2 O 0 N CO LLJ W I W • O 2 u _ = d I— _ Z H O Z W gy = p U O C O 1- W W 2 I— 1 L O W Z U 2 O I— Z 05/16/2002 19:47 206- 335 - 5979 - • • LOCATION: Tukwila, WA TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY TRAFFIC DATA GT1-RING PAGE 09 PREPARED BY: TDG Thu. 4/18/2002 • Thu. 4/18/2002 TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT Slat Avenue.$_ 0 • S 164th Struot W Valle t IBS 0 •405 NB Ramps/S 156th St - Slat Avenue, North Leg South L•e : S 164th Street , yl/ Valley Highway S s 158th StA•405 Rams West Leg fisast Leg West Leg Leg South LagEast Lel 7 :15 AM • 0 0• • ;•••' fi'. 0 .•. 0 4 ` . 0 '. 0 3 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0' 0 . s 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 'o ' o. o o . 0 0 2 0 8:00 AM o 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM' o o a 0 o 0 1 0 8:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM• . 9 :00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 05/16/2002 19:47 206- 335 - 5979 - • • LOCATION: Tukwila, WA TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY TRAFFIC DATA GT1-RING PAGE 09 PREPARED BY: TDG '1 hUali 6=02 •••••••••• .. �'.:. • •. Thu. 4/18/2002 �_ TIME INTERVAL • ENDING AT Slat AVenvo,$: Q; &164th Street '..:W:Valte Hwy S • 1-405 Na Ram • : - 156th St . Slat Avenue 5 S 164th Street • • W Valle H hway S S 156th•St11 v�r� -405 Ramps ! North Leg South Leg East Lel , Wet l . 0 North Lett 0 South La o East Leg 1 West Leg 0 4 :15 PM o • • 2 0 '• 4:30 PM o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0• 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 :30 PM o 1 . 1 0 0 0 4 0 5 :45 PM , o ' . 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) :00 PM o ' 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 Total 0 4 .• • 1 2 1•0. .• 0 6 0 05/16/2002 19:47 206- 335 - 5979 - • • LOCATION: Tukwila, WA TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY TRAFFIC DATA GT1-RING PAGE 09 PREPARED BY: TDG • t rn N m TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 - 6 :00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4 :15 PM TO 5:15 PM Southcenter Boulevard 2,0791 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN OUT 4,066 4,066 COUNTED BY: REDUCED BY: 658 1,421 • ' DATE OF REDUCTION: SW TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING... ,1,621 CN f• • Wed. 4/24/02 975 . 2,667 71 1 10461 Tukwila, WA • Southcenter Blvd . 6 61st Avenue Bridge 'Soiiiiicenter Boulevard • 741 200 SB NB .■B EB • INTFIS. HV #N /A 3% 1% .. 2% 2% PHF #WA 0.89 0.91 0.96 0.99 HV- • =HEAVY VEHICLES PHF 2 PEAK HOUR FACTOR DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 4/11/02 TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 - 6:00 PM WEATHER: 9411 1 729 Rain z ~ W CC .i 00 U W W J = H 2 (L. WOO 2 u. Q co a I... W i Z �. F-- O W F- 2 p U U CI H W UJ . F U Z Ll l CO O~ z . • Wed:t1110/2002 . _._ .-- .... . . TIME Tukwliii Pii'rkUvily @, 61st Avenue Glst Avenue •••-ealthcenter Boulevard (g Gist Avenue INTERVAL ENDING AT Gist Avenue • • • Tukwila Parkway East Leg , . . Gist Avenue Southcenter Boulevard North Leg Southcenter Boulevard North Lag East Lag West Leg East Leg West Leg South Leg East Leg West Leg 7:15 AM o West Lcg • 0 a 0 5 o 1 0 7:30 AM a 2 a 0 0 0 5:00 PM o 0 1 0 7:45 AM a o 1 . a 0 o 5 0 0 1 0 5:00 AM o o 0 0 0 12:00 PM o 2 0 1 0 8:15 AM o 0 • 0 0 o 12:15 PM a 0 1 0 8:30 AM o. 3 0 0 0 1 0 12:30 PM .0 1 0 8:45 AM o . • . o o 0 1 0 0 1 0 9:00 AM o . . • .. .... a 0 • o • • .0 1 0 Total o VV 2 3 0 . 0 ' • • 0 a 0 LOCATION: Tukwiti;AAW7,7 • TRAFFIC DATA GATH5RING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY . • • :•-• • PREPARED BY: TDG • Va.-4710/2002 . • t. • ' '" • ' Sat. vamoo .— _- - Sat. 110/1500 TIME INTERVAL ENDING AT TukPa Glst Avenue (g 61st Avenue . Gist Avenue . 'Southcenfer Boulevard 61 Gist Avenue 61st Avenue East Leg Tukwila Parkway ' ' ' 61 AN'ienue Southcenter Boulevard North Lag 4:15 PM o East Leg West Leg 0 1 South Leg East Leg West Lcg 11:15 AM o 0 0 5 0 4:45 PM o 0 2 a 11:30 AM o 0 5:00 PM o o o 0 0 o 1 a 11:45 AM o 5 0 o . o 0 5:30 PM o 0 1 0 12:00 PM o 2 0 5:45 PM . . 2 0 . 1 0 0 2 ' o 12:15 PM a o o 2 0 3 0 Total 0 1 0 12:30 PM • o .. . 0 1 0 0 1 0 12:45 PM o • 1 0 o • 0 0 1:00 PM o • VV 2 0 0 0 0 Total o 13 0 0 .• ••• : o a o LOCATION: Tukwiti;AAW7,7 • TRAFFIC DATA GATH5RING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY . • • :•-• • PREPARED BY: TDG • .: .: • 4:.••• Wed. 4/10/2002 . • t. • ' '" • ' Sat. vamoo TIME Tukwila Parkway e 61st Avenue Southcenter Boulevard @ 61st Avenue INTERVAL ENDING AT Glst Avenue Tukwila Parkway . Gist Avenue Southcenter Boulevard North Leg East Leg West Leg 1 .South Leg East Leg West Leg 4:15 PM o 4 0 0 1 0 4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 2 0 4:45 PM o 1 0 0 2 0 5:00 PM o • -0 0 0 3 0 5;15 PM o 5 0 0 z 0 5:30 PM o 1 0 0 2 0 5:45 PM o . 1 0 o 1 o 6:00 PM o o o o o 3 0 Total o • 9. 13 0 0 . 0 16 0 LOCATION: Tukwiti;AAW7,7 • TRAFFIC DATA GATH5RING PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY . • • :•-• • PREPARED BY: TDG i 1 u Southcenter Boulevard est 1 I .950 676 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN OUT 2,845 2, COUNTED BY: JU REDUCED BY: CN TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 - 6:00 POW HOUR: 4:30 PM .`• TO 3:30 PM ✓ co tb 0 a DATE: Sun.4/14/02 .l TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING I 0 1 249 I 1559 1 0 AA 1 889 1 840 Southcenter Boulevard 0 701 679 Soiith enter Blvd @ 66th Avenue Bridge Tukwila, WA A-- I 1.280 1 SB NB WB EB 'INTRS. HV #NI 3% 3% 6% 3% PHF #NIA 0.78 0.68 0.72 0.72 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 4/11/02 TIME OF COUNT: 4 :00- 6:00 PM WEATHER: Rain z = 00 0 . w J w o 2 J • a = W I— = zF- I— 0 Z I- U • co co_ 01— 0 w � U —O U W - _ 0 z LOCATION: .. • Tukwila, WA IT TRAFFIC DATA GATflERWG' PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY PREPARED BY: TDG Thu. 4411/2002 • Wed. 4/312002 TIME . . . Southeenter Boulevard @ 66th Avenue Sou thcanter 'Boulevard @ Interurban Avenue INTERVAL ENDING AT 66th Avenue - Southeenter Boulevard Interurban Ave/V1 Valley SW Grady/Southcenbar B South Leg .South Leg East Leg West Leg .. . . . North Leg • South Leg East Leg West Leg 1:15 AM 0 0 0 - 0 - -- • 0 0 0 7:30 AM =, 0 0 ..■ 0—.--- - . • o• 0 0 7:45 AM b o o - • •-b --- -- o o o 8:00 AM o - 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM a • o o . o 0 • • 0 0 0 8:30 AM b 0 0 o • 4 0 o 0 0 8:45 AM o 0 0 a 0 o o 0 9:00 AM o o 2 0 0 o o 0 Total , . 0 0 2 0 ' 0 0 0 0 LOCATION: .. • Tukwila, WA IT TRAFFIC DATA GATflERWG' PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY PREPARED BY: TDG Thu. 4/11/2002 Wed. 4/3/2002 TIME INTERVAL ENDINGAT Southcenter Boulevard a 66th Avenue Southcenter Boulevard @ Interurban Avenue 66th Avenue Soathcenter Boulevard Interurban Ave/W Valley SW Grady/Southeenter B SW Grady/Southcenter B South Leg East Leg West Leg North Leg South Leg East Leg West Leg 11:15 AM 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM . 0 0 o 0 0 0 11:45 AM 4:45 PM b 0 o 0 0 0 12:00 PM 5:00 PM 1 0 ............. o . 0 0 0 12:15 PM 5:15 PM a 1 0 o o 0 0 12:30 PM 5:30 PM b 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 5:45 PM o 2 0 0 o ' 0 0 1:00 PM 6:00 PM o o a a o 0 0 Total o 0. 4 0 0 0 0 . 0 LOCATION: .. • Tukwila, WA IT TRAFFIC DATA GATflERWG' PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY PREPARED BY: TDG Thu. 4/11/2002 Wed. 4/3/2002 TIME Southcenter Boulevard e 66th Avenue Southcenter Boulevard @Interurban Avenue INTERVAL ENDING AT 66th Avenue Southcenter Boulevard Interurban Ave/W Valley SW Grady/Southcenter B South Leg East Leg West Leg North Leg South Leg East Lag West Leg 4:15 PM o 0 0 0 0 o 0 4:30 PM 0 0 o • o o 0 0 4:45 PM b 0 o o 0 0 0 5:00 PM a o 0 1 0 0 0 5:15 PM ' o o o 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6:00 PM o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 o 0 LOCATION: .. • Tukwila, WA IT TRAFFIC DATA GATflERWG' PEDESTRIANS VOLUME SUMMARY PREPARED BY: TDG Southcenter Boulevard A. N T N 1.078 1,044 1 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN OUT 4,991 4,991 COUNTED BY: BW/RB REDUCED BY: CN DATE: Sun. 4/14/02 1 R T . TRAFFIC DATA GATHERING • TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 4:00 - 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4 :30 PM TO 5 :30 PM 1,033 130 1 659 l 244 TT I. 2,362 .- 11,329 154 �►�'' 729 } . ;..._ ..i 11125 178 Tukwila, WA 568 1 1.2321 486 • 2,357 }--- ---- -� . 607 770 305 SW Grady Way 1,682 I 1,459 I of SB NB WB INTRS. HV 6% 5% 1% 3% 4% PHF 0.82 0.86 0.92 0.93 0.96 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor Southcenter BIvdISW Grady Way Interurban Ave/West Valley Hwy DATE OF COUNT: Wed. 413/02 TIME OF COUNT:' 4:00 - 6:00 PM WEATHER: Sunny TI 1LA, WASHINGTON 'L UTHBOUND OFF RAMP (53RD AVE S) 4,..<4TH ST (SOUTH CENTER BLVD) LOC# O1P TUK02283M 45 Sa OFF RAMP From North S 154Th ST (SOUTH CENTER BLVD) From East Thru Total RI. t Tnru ®1•0111 Ri: TAni 141t ADD. Total RI¢ht Lett Left App. Total 5 154TH ST (SOUTH CENTER BLVD) From Wag RI Apo. Total Peak Flour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM . Peak 1 of 1 m Into atoo 04:45 PM Volume 200 Percent 162 05:15 Volume 53 Peak Factor High In . 05:15 PM Volume 53 Peak haw • Start lime 12 1024 1298 1.0 62.8 4 275 392 4 275 332 0.931 O 556 0.0 93.1 O 150 05:15 PM O 150 14 164 0.910 TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 41 597 flB 14 16 . No 63 68.8 14 04:45 PM 15 15 55 OFF RAMP Out 1___sJ K T L 12.161 . R1pht Tflru L�R ' 10/17/024:45:00 PM 10/17(02 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY r' 157 Out In Total 59RaAV 4 53RD AVE S From South 0 0.0 0 0 24 31.2 2 9 77 16 24 0.802 27 5.6 5 05:30 PM 9 File Name ; TUK28901P Site Code :00000001 Start Date ; 10/17/2002 Page No ;2 462 0 489 2399 84.5 0.0 125 0 190 642 0.934 137 0 146 0.837 �3?`''cEkf'^ a'_uuc�%c.:ff:'+r Ta`5iili#6:s7:5m':syavrL' ; • :Y,i"J,S1J ar 3 tiw9iSat4 lea Ow InLTot41 INTERSECTION B - TRAFFIC VOLUMES Southcenter Blvd/Macadam Road S. Robb Rezone - Traffic Impact Analysis (BCE Job #: 10751) MOVEMENTS Time Period Ending SBRT SBTH SBLT WBRT WBTH WBLT NBRT INBTH NBLT EBRT EBTH tEBLT Total 1615 7 20 32 000000001 20 79 1630 9 26 45 25 105 1645 6 25 45 31 107 . 1700 7 26 38 60 131 1715 10 0 17 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 98 1730 17 31 21 • 39 108 1745 12 18 24 22 76 1800 10 43 32 37 122 Total Volumes 78 0 206 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 268 826 Peak Hour Volumes 32 0 94 165 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 150 441 Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes: Macadam Road South SBRT SBTH SBLT 32 0 94 EBLT 150 165 WBRT EBTH 2149 1774 WBTH Southcenter Blvd. Southcenter Blvd. EBRT 0 0 WBLT 0 0 0 NBLT NBTH NBRT Remarks: Eastbound Through and Westbound Through Traffic Volumes are based on Counts conducted at the Southcenter Blvd /61st Ave S. intersection by Traffic Data Gathering on Thursday, April 11, 2002 between 4:15 and 5:15 PM. Volumes are converted to 2003. Remaining Counts were conducted by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. on Thursday, April 17, 2003. Prepared By Barghausen Consulting Engineers .. . :•4:01 - it 5intiwtil6'`. - 00013 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR1HAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • • APR 15 '03 02: 44PM TUKWILA DCD.PW + ity of Tukwila Location Report 04/15/2003 ltolrt Period: 01/01 /2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: 61 AVE S (S -LINE) at SOUTHCENTER BLVD Year 2000 o tston Date Mon -U 1/ AU/ Mon - 01/31/2000 Fri- 02/11/2000 Fri - 03/10/2000 Wed - 03/22/2000 Tue- 04/11/2000 Thu- 04/13/2000 Tue- 04/25/2000 Thu- 04/27/2000 ;'. ' :.Wed- 05/03/2000 Sun- 06/11/2000 Wed - 07/19/2000 Sat - 07/22/2000 -...,Sat-08/26/2000 )un- 08/27/2000 - 'Ihu- 08/31/2000 Sat - 09/23/2000 Wed - 11/29/2000 Tue- 12/05/2000 Thu - 12/14/2000 Wed- 12/20/2000 Thu - 12/21/2000 Number of Collisions: 22 Year 2001 Mon-01/29/2001 Fri- 02/022001 Sun- 04/222001 Fri- 06/012001 Sun- 06/10/2001 Thu - 06/14/2001 • . Sun - 06/24/2001 Sun- 06/242001 Wed - 08/152001 Sat-08/25/2001 Sat - 08/25/2001 Sat- 09/29/2001 _ .ouv- 10/07/2001 Sun - 10/21/2001 ime 10:04 AM 04 ;22 PM 11:10 AM 01:22 PM 02:02 PM 03 :33 PM 05 :17 PM 12 :57 PM 12 :53 PM ase Collision Number Type of Collision ear - n - 08:50 AM 0000808 Head On 12:08 PM 0001083 Right Angle 12 :58 PM 001846 Rear End 03 :30 PM 00206 Right Angle 05:16 PM 002769: Sideswipe 07:55 AM 002802 Sideswipe 05 :54 PM 003142 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 03 :40 PM 003177 Approach Turn 02 :40 PM 0003336 Rear End 05 ;30 PM 004356 Right Angle 05:30 PM 005365 Rear End 02 :41 PM 005443 Rear End 006322 Sideswipe 006353 Rear End 006447 Sideswipe 007004 Rear End 00 -8777 Sideswipe 00 -8941 Sideswipe 00.9166 Rear End 00-9328 Rear End 00 -9360 Rea' End U2:UU PM U1.646 Rear End 03:35 PM 01-761 Rear End 03 :52 PM 01 -2729 Rear End 02:36 PM 01 -3731 Sideswipe 03:16 PM 01 -03991 Rear End 08:20 PM 01 -4092 Rear End 03:30 PM 01 -04326 Rear End 04:07 PM 01 -4328 Sideswipe 11 :20 AM 01 -5640 Rear End 02:20 PM 01 -5898 Rear. End 09 :13 PM 01 -5912 itight Angle 10:50 AM 01 -6713 Rear E'iid 01:32 PM 01 -6904 . RearEnd 11:26 AM 01 -7251 Sideswipe Pagel ire on Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat 4 11 .1 • \t .. W - >9 W - >E S - >N: N- ;s1 N - >,.1 N->W E - >W .'W >N S - >N S - >W W - >E W->E N - >S W - >E E->S W - >E N - >S E - >W E - >W W - >E W:>E S - >N S - >W Prk E - >W N - >E N - >W E- >W Prk W - >E W ->E W->E N - >S W->E E->W W - >E N->N E - >W Prk W- >E W->E W->E W 0 E->W 0 E - >W E->W 0 W->S W->S 0 WaE B 0 W - >E Prk 0 W->E Prk 0 W - >S S->W 0 W->E W - >E 0 W >E Prk 0 W - >S N - >S 0 W= E • B 0 W � . 0 W - >E W - >E 0 UM mum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 o 1 0 1 P.2/12 0 Inj P1D0 Run Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 P 2 •H 3 P 2 P 2 3 P 2 P 4 P 2 3 P 2 P 2 P 3 4 2 Totals: 0 6 9 1 53 Collision Date ' 1 une Ot Case Collision N,unber Type of Collision • llirecuon Num Num Hit & lot Veh 1 Vela 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh 1 P 3 P H 2 P 3 P 2 P 2 1 2 1 2 1 MI 2 1 M 2 2 .� 2 2 P C) . p Q 4 1 0 2 r of Collisions: 1'7 Year 2002 o i Iston Date II II Sat - 02/23/2002 Sat - 03/30/2002 Mon - 04/15/2002 . Sat - 06/29/2002 Sat - 06/29/2002 Sun - 07/07/2002 Sun - 07128/2002 Tue- 0812012002 Sat-08/31/2002 Sun - 09/01/2002 Mon- 09/02/2002 Mon - 09/09/2002 Sat - 09/21/2002 Sat-09/28/2002 Thu- 10/31/2002 Sat - 11/02/2002 Sat - 11/09/2002 Mon- 12/23/2002 • APR 15 '03 02:44PM TUKWILA DCD /PW Wed - 12/12/2001 Mon - 12/31/2001 u Number of Collisions; 19 e d Totals: Number of Collisions: Number of Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: Collision Rate: 0.00 Ci C. C g e 02:00 PM 01 -08528 Rear End 05:01 PM 01 -9005 Sideswipe une ase Collision Number Type of Collision , • o ' • • - t. eswipo 02 :42 PM 02 -1266 Rear End 06:26 PM 02 -2095 Rear End 07:08 PM 02.2455 Right Angle 02:36 PM 024201 Rear End 02:55 PM 02-4202 Rear End 11 :40 AM 02 -4358 .Sideswipe 02:34 PM 02.4791tea.r End 11:25 AM 02.5338 Sideswipe 04;06 PM 02 -5589 • eared 05:20 PM 02 -5615 Rear End 05:27 PM 02 -5632 Right Angle 03:30 PM 02-5806 Sideswipe 11:19 PM 02 -6071 Sideswipe 11:19 AM 02 -6217 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N - >S 05 :05 PM 02 -7041 Rear End. N - >S 01:40 AM 02 -7068 Right Angle W -> E 12:47 PM 02 -7257 Rear End W - >E 07:50 PM 02 -8514 Rear End N - >S 58 . 133 0 (0,00 22/16 (37.93°141; . 36 (62:07 °4 - Paget W - >E W - >E W - >E W - >E W->E W - >E W - >E W - >E S - >W E,->W W - >E Prk W - >E Prk W - >$ Prk W- >E' W->E W - >S W >S Prk S -N S - >N w- S->W N - >S N - >S W - >E W - >B Prk N - >S S - >W Prk Prk P.3/12 2 Totals: 0 7 11 1 38 irecuon ' um urn Veh 1 Veb 2 Fat Inj W - >E W - >b U 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - u of PDO Run Veh 2 P 3 H 2 2 P H 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 1 P 2 P 2 P 3 P 2 P 4 Totals: 0 3 16 2 42 • APR 15 ' 03 02: 44PM TUKWILA DCD /PI4 `ly of Tukwila Location Report 04/15/2003 RotIrtPeriod: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: 53 AVE S at SOUTHCENTER BLVD Year 2000 o ision ime I ase Date Collision Number Type of Collision Wed- 07119r200'0' ' :15 PM UO363 Sideswipe Mon -08 /14/2000 03:23 PM 006018 Approach Turn Number of Collisions: 2 Year 2001 o 1 nston Date I hu- 04/26720U 1 Sun- 06/24/2001 12:08 PM 01 -4322 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N - >E Number of Collisions: 2 1002 l o sion lime Ot Case Date Collision Number Type of Collision lllu -U 1/T4/2002 "08 :40 AM 01. -6U .Keay E3 Sat - 03/09/2002 Sun - 08/18/2002 Wed - 08/28/2002 Fri - 09/06/2002 Mon-11/25/2002 Number of Collisions: 6 Grand Totals: Number of Collisions: • Number of Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of injuries: Number of ?DOs: Collision Rate: 0.00 min • ase Collision Number Type of Collision 11:23 AM 012833 Right Angle • 03:47 PM 02 -1588 Rear End 04:15 PM 02 -5286 Approach Turn . 09:34 AM 02 -5513 Approach Turn 08:00 AM 02 -5715 Rear End 09:54 PM 02 -7700 Approach Turn 10 19 0 (0.00 %) 4/4 (40.00 %) 6 (60.00 %) • irec ion um " urn Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO E->S W->E 0 rrec ron "um "um - t :' or Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->W W - >1 U 1 Direction • Num Num tht & 1 o Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PAO Run Veh E- W E->W E ->S W >E E-> W - >E E - >W Prk E - >S W - >E -> Totals: 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 P P P.4 /12 P P H P It of Run Veh. 2 Totals: • 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 3 2 1 2 I Totals: 0 2 4 1 11 te 4iarii.- ort Period: 01/01 /2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: 66 AVE S at SOUTHCENTER BLVD Year 2000 o ion Date — Sat - 05/27 /200b Mon - 09118/2000 Number of Collisions: 2 Year 2001 0 51011 APR 15 '03 02: 45Pt1 IUKWILA DCD /P t1 of Tukwila Location Report 04/15/2003 Data Wed- 07/T4/2001 - - 11:40 AM 0 Rear bnci Fri- 03/02/2001 10 :08 AM 01 -1484 Head On '' Thu-07/1212001 01:50 PM 01-4808 Rear End Number of Collisions: 3 ar 2002 Collision Date — C u i- 133/28%20l12 Wed - 04/24/2002 Sun - 06/09/2002 Sat - 09/142002 Number of Collisions: 4 Grand Totals: Number of Collisions: Number of Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: Collision Rate: 0 -00 tme • ase Collision Number Type of Collision 02:001'1MI 003952 RearEnd 08:29 AM 006878 Sideswipe ame ' ase Collision Number Type of Collision time Lit Case Collision Number Type of Collision 04:00 PM 0.2-2046 Sideswipe 01:02 PM 02 -2663 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 07:27 PM 02 -3778 Sideswipe 09:19 AM 02 -5913 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 9 18 0 (0:00 %.) 111 (lump 8 (88.89 %). • cp Pagel ire ion Veh 1 Vela 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S - >h, S - >E 0 S - >E S - >E 0 pirection Nunn Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Er >W E - W 0 E - >W Prk 0 S - >E S - >E 0 W->N 0 Um um 1' P P. 5/12 tC • of 2 Totals: 0 0 2 0 4 irec. on UM urn ' it at Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E - >W B 0 ... _.....,_._ ....__� 2 W >E B 0 P 2 E->W E - >W 0 P 2 Totals: 0 0 3 0 6 Num kltt & 1 of Inj PDO Run Veh 1' H 2 P 3 P 2 1 1 Totals: 0 1 3 1 8 Nh+ . :�� 1ir A�uFi.SVEG� 'JJ ^ Ni2WY..laYlilii' Y wYysY'YH!�h�'.ldi APR 15 ' 03 02: 4SPM TUKWILA DCD /P amity of Tukwila Location Report 04/15/2003 P irt Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 •�M Location: 65 AVE S at SOUTT3G'ENTE1,•B1:;.VD Year 2000 o Is ion ime ' ase Date ' gill 04:04•PM 004'10 t g e Number of Collisions: 1 Year 2002 O i Son ime a ase Ire on 1 um um ' 1t Ot Date Collision Numbcr Type ;of Collision Veli 1 Veh 2 Fat Mon - 04/29/2002 12: PM 02- 2'/"74• iig Wngr N ? .6->W 0 1 t.;:::rnber of Collisions: 1 Grand Totals: Number of Collisions: 2 Ii 'per of Vehicles Involved: 4 14...d er of Fatalities: 0 (0.00 %) Number of Injuries; 1/1 (50.00 %) Number of PDOs: 1 (50.00 %) Collision Rate: 0.00 Collision Number Type of Collision ' s. Pagel 1rec on um um - • o Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh 0" - I' ' Totals: • P.6/12 Totals; 0 0 1 0 2 Inj PDO Run Veh 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 • APR 15 ' 03 02: 45PM TUKWILA DCD /P 21ty of Tukwila Location Report 04/15/2003 P^ rt Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 C Location: INTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD Year 2000 o I isxon Date ' ' on 3/'1UOo Thu -05 /04/2000 Sun - 05/14/2000 Wed - 0621/2000 Mon - 07/10/2000 The- 08/29/2000 Tue- 11107/2000 Mon - 12/11/2000 Thu- 12/14/2000 ime • ase Collision Number Type of Collision U3:30 0001'127 Rear End- 03:17 PM 0003369 Rear End 11:32 AM 003049 Sideswipe 03:05 PM 0004617 Rear End 02:25 PM 0005122 Other 08:50 AM 0006385 Rear End 10:50 PM 00 -8219 Head On 03:54 PM 00 -9084 Rear End 12 :00 PM 00 -9186 Sideswipe • rec on " um " um Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO W k3 0 1 N->W Prk 0 P S - >N S - >N 0 P W - > W- >S 0 1 W - >N 0 P N - >W N - >W 0 P N - >S E ->W 0 2 N->S N - >S 0 P . W->E Prk 0 P ' tt of Run Veh 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 H 2 ;umber of Collisions: 9 Year 2001 \ Collision Date — 1911 - m-0170 Thu -01 /11/2001 'lie -03/272001 Wed - 03282001 Fri- 06/012001 Tue- 11202001 Number of Collisions: 6 Year 2002 collision Date Thu- 01/03%1002 Sat - 01/192002 Tue- 02/12/2002 Mon - 02/182002 Thu- 03/07/2002 Thu-03/21/2002 Tue- 04/30/2002 Mon- 05/13/2002 . Sun-06/02/2002 Thu- 07/04/2002 Cry Sat-07/20/2002 •-■ Mon - 08/122002 O( rd- 03/142002 C Ilse- 08/27/2002 0 Mon - 09/162002 lim of Case Collision Number Type of Collision o: -0209 Rear EnE 06:10 PM 01 -259 Rear End 02:44 PM 01 -2085 Rear End 09:17 PM 01 -2133 Approach Turn 01:27 PM 01 -3728 Rear End 06:49 PM 01 -8025 Rear•:End rime of Case Collision Number Type of Collision 05:46 Pli4 02 =01073 Rear End 08:50 PM 02 -457 Approach Turn 08:15 PM 02 -01037 Rear End 11:50 AM 02 -01158 Rear End 05:37 PM 02 -1546 Rear End 03:05 PM 02 -1864 Rear End 11:25 AM 02 -2793 Right Angle 05:53 PM 02 -3134 Rear End 10:19 AM 02 -3609 Rear End 05:05 PM 02 -4311 Rear *End 11:10 AM 02 -4646 Rear End 05:27 PM 02 -5162 Rear End 06:53 PM 02 -5204 Rear 11:15 AM 02 -05496 Sideswipe 12 :12 PM 02 -5960 Rear End . mil.. Pagel Direction Num Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat N - >S S - >W Eck s->W N - >W N->W Totals: 0 Nay S - >W W->E N->S N - >W N - >W 0 0 0. 0 0 0 4 6 1 17 Num Inj 2 Totals: 0 2 5 Direction Num Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat S -> W S-5- 0 N - >E S->N 0 N - >S N - >S 0 2 N->S N ->S 0 1 W->S W->S 0 S->N S - >N 0 1 W - >E N->S 0 N - >W N - >W 0 N - >W N->W 0 N->S Prk 0 N - >VV N->W 0 WE •'Prk 0 S -5W °• "S- >W 0 W->S W->S 0 N - > N - >W 0 1 Hit & lot PDO Run Veh 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 P 2 Num rirt & lot Inj PDO Run Veh 1 P P P P P P P P P P.7/12 12 2 3 2 H .2 2 1 H 2 2 'y I' Number of Collisions: 16 . 90,d Totals: k.....jer of Collisions: 31 Number of Vehicles Involved: 62 Number of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%) Number of Injuries; 9/12 (29.03%) Number of PDOs: 22 (70.97%) Collision Rate: 0.00 • APR 15 '03 02: 46R1 TUKWILA D'CIVPW 1: It • Page2 • ••••••• . •.: P.8/12 S->N 0 Totals: 0 6 11 2 33 N cen C. C • APR 15 '03 02: 46PM TUKWILA DCD /P WY1 of Tukwila Location Report 04/15/2003 Prr rt Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: FORT DENT WAY at INTERURBAN AVE S Year 2000 o islon ime • ase Date 11n -U 1/ 14/2000 Sat - 01/15/2000 Mon -01/24/2000 Wed - 03/08/2000 Fri - 03/17/2000 Mon - 04/03/2000 Fri- 05/26/2000 Fri- 06/16/2000 'hie - 07/18/2000 Fr1- 09/01/2000 Fri- 12/01/2000 Fri- 12/29/2000 1� `'qer of Collisions: 12 Year 2001 l Number of Collisions: 17 Year 2002 = 1 ) Collision rJ Date Q — Mori= D1707/2 Collision Number — 09:35 AM 0UUO338 05:00 AM 0000365 01:10 PM 0000610 10:05 PM 001803 04:45 PM 002057 06:54 PM 002560 02:42 PM 003930 02:20 PM .004439 06:45 PM 005338 07:18 PM 006478 04:52 PM 00 -8837 07:37 AM 00 -9556 • Type of Collision Ktgbt Angle Sideswipe Approach Turn Right Angle Sideswipe Pedestrian/Cyclist Involved Rear End Backing Approach Turn Approach Turn Rear End Head On Tome Ot Case Collision Number Type of Collision 12:30 PM 02 -280 hear )End ermirlrin ,r1„ Page1 r erection Veh 1 Veh 2 S - >W N->S um Fat 0 urn Inj Say S - >S 0 S - >W N - >S 0 N - >S S->W 0 S - >N S - >N 0 2 N - >W S - >N 0 1 S - >N S - >N 0 Bck E - >W 0 N - >S S - >W .0 W - >S E->S 0 N - >S Prk 0 N - >S S - >N 0 Totals: 0 P P P P P P P.9/12 - i • of PDO Run Veh 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Totals: 0 3 6 0 24 CAAiszon Date — on- 01/0g/2001 Tue- 02/13/2001 Mon - 04/02/2001 Tue - 04/10/2001 Wed- 04/11/2001 Thu- 04/26 /2001 Wed - 05/16/2001 Wed - 06/06/2001 Tue - 06/19/2001 Sun -06 /24/2001 Thu -07/19/2001 Mon -09/10/2001 Thu- 10/11/2001 Wed - 10/17/2001 Sun- 11/04/2001 Thu- 11/15/2001 Fri- 11/30/2001 . time Ot Case Collision Number Type of Collision 0719 PM 01 -111/ 06:00 AM 01 -1042 04:50 PM 01 -2222 12:30 PM 01-2418 09:40 AM 01 -02439 02:40 PM 02 -2715 04:09 PM 01-3362 05:34 PM 01 -3889 11:37 AM 01-4186 02:51 PM 01 -4327 04 :50 PM 01 -4985 02:38 PM 01 -6274 08:56 PM 01 -7023 02:30 PM 01 -7211 04:50 PM 01 -7616 01:12 PM 01 -7899 09:15 AM 01 -8234 Approach Turn Rear End Approach Turn Approach Turn Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Rear End Approach Tura Rear.End Approach Turn Sideswipe Sideswipe Ri ,iit•Ang1e A`iffeineh Turn • Pedestrian/Cyclist Involved Approach Turn . Rear End Backing Direction Num Num . Htt& lot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat. Inj PDO Run Veh S - >W S - >N S->w s->w Bck S - >N s->w S - >N N - >S Ww >S W->E S->W N - >b S - >N N - >S N - >S E->W S->N N - >S S- >E S - >W N - >W W >E N - >S N >W N->S E->W S->W N - >S S->N S - >N Bck.• Prk U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 • 1 1' P P P P P P P P P P H H H 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2, 3 3 2 2 3 2 6 12 3 36 Direction Num Num Mitt & 1'oc Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->W E->W 0 P I I: If Tue-02/19/2002 Mon-03/25/2002 The-04/16/2002 , ri-05/03/2002 L.._ &05/15/2002 Thu-05/16/2002 Fri-06/14/2002 Mon-07/15/2002 Mon-09/02/2002 Mon-09/16/2002, Sun-09/29/2002 The-11/19/2002 Number of Collisions: 14 Grand Totals: Number of Collisions: 43 Number of Vehicles Involved: 88 Number of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%) , Number of Injuries; 15/13 (34.88%) Number of PD0s; 28 (65.12%)::::: At .• , . Collision Rate; 0.00 • APR 15 '03 02:46PM TUKWILA DCD/PW 1 • I r l- A • esype 12:50 PM 02-1181 Rear End 11:40 AM 02-1969 ApOioach Turn 02:11 PM 02-2472 ItiOt•Angle 12 PM 02-2866 Re4t gO, 07:50 AM 02-3175 1§4 0240 PM 02-3208. Aiii4Ch'rurn 05:43 AM 02-389.0 40, Tunl 10:18 AM 02-4524. Fiiied.Object/Parked Vehicle 06:17 PM 02-5634 Approach Turn 10:04 AM 02-5955 Approach Turn 0925 AM 02-06237 Approach Turn 02:51 PM 02-7514 Approach Turn Page2 P.10/12 .> -> N->S N->S 0 P 2 S->W N->S 0 I 2 S->W S->N 0 P 2 . . N-S, N->S 0 P 2 S.A : S->N 0 P 2 ..... S-5W: 1‘1:>S 0 P 2 ssyf N->S 0 2 2 S->N . !Prk .0 P 2 S->W N->S 0 P 2 S->W N->S 0 P 2 S->N N->E 0 P 2 S->W N->S 0 1 2 Totals: 0 4 10 0 28 •C7) CY) 0 - 4tSt'i' • • • • Irt Period: 01 /01 /2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: MACADAM RD S at SOUTHCENTER BLVD APR 15 '03 02 :46PM 'TUKWILA DCD /PW"`jtr of Tukwila • Location Report 04/15/2003 Year 2000 o ision Date at- Thu -10 /05/2000 Fri - 10/20/2000 Sat -1 0/28/2000 Sun - 10/29/2000 Sun - 11/1212000 Fri- 11/24/2000 Tue- 12/26/2000 TUe- 12/26/2000 Sat - 12/30/2000 Number of Collisions: 10 2001 collision Date Thu- 03/1)1200 I Sun- 05/13/2001 Sat-05/26/2001 Sat - 06/02/2001 Wed - 08/22/2001 Fri -08/24/2001 Mon- 09/03/200I Fri- 10/05/2001 Sun- 10/21/2001 Mon - 11/12/2001 Sat - 12/01/2001 Wed - 12/26/2001 Number of Collisions: 12 Year 2002 Collision Date Mon -W/04 /200'2 4... Tue- 02/05 /2002 Fri - 02/15/2002 Sun - 02/17/2002 Q Sun - 03/10/2002 p j e- 04/23/2002 • don -05/27/2002 Fri- 07/05/2002 ime • ase Collision Number : WPM 006485 09:00 AM 00 -07296 01:49 PM 00 -07733 12:40 PM 00-7946 03:30 PM 00 -7977 10:16 AM 00 -08328 11:40 AM 00 -08626 1 1:35 AM 00 -9481 12:58 PM 00 -9483 04 :15 PM 00 -9593 i une Ot Case Collision. Number x6:03'PM U1 -1814 09:12 PM 01 -3282 09:10 AM 01 -03592 12:30 PM 01 -3755 11 :56 AM 01 -5819 08:43 PM 01 -5881 02:44 PM 01 -6103 08:55 AM 01 -6852 01:50 PM 01 -7253 12:58 PM 01 -7830 02:10 PM 01 -8261 01:36 PM 01 -8864 Type of Collision • estrt c st . vo ve Rear End Rea% End' Rear End Rear End Right Angle Right Angle Rear End. Rear .End Rear End Type of Collision Rear End Head On Fized::Object/Parked Vehicle Rear End Pixed:Object/Parked Vehicle Rear End Rear End Right Angle Rear End Rear End Rear End Right Angle 04:28 PM 02 -1616 Reds d 12 :00 PM 02-2643 F•it'ed;Object/Parked Vehicle 02 :49 PM 02 -3450 1tt9r Ind 04:09 PM 02 -4326 Right Angle irec on Veh 1 Veb 2 Fat • fl S->N S->N 0 E - >W E - >W 0 1 W - >E W - >E 0 N - >S. Prk 0 E->W N->E 0 E->W N - >E 0 W - >E W- >E 0 W->E W- >E 0 W - >E Prk 0 1 ime Ut Case Direction Num Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 at O8:3S AM 02 -82) Sideswipe W - >E - W'-'>E ' 0 05:00 PM 02 -871 Fixed'Object/Parked Vehicle • • N - >5 0 10 :40 PM 02-1110 Apptoach Turn E ->W W->N 0 12:10 PM 02 -1137. hear End W - >E W -'E 0 um .' um Direction Num Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Yrk S ->J U E->W W->E 0 N - >S Pik 0 I3 - >W E - >W 0 S ->N 0 1N - >N W->N 0 1 W - >E W - >E 0 N->E E - >W. 0 W ->E 0 1 E->W E - >W 0 W->E W- >E 0 1 S->W W - >E 0 P. 11/12 L 01 Inj PDO Run Veh P 2 2 I' 3 P 2 P H 2 P 2 P 2 P H 2 P 4 Totals: 0 2 8 3 22 Num Hit & lot Inj PDO Run Veh F 2 2 2 H 2 P ! . P P P P 3 1 3 2 2 3 2 Totals: 0 5 7 2 27 E - >W E - >W 0 W->E ; Prk 0 W- %E • Prk 0 PiiIL= E •>W 0 Num Inj 1 1 l- t lot PDO Run Veil P z P H 1 • 2 2 2 P P P P z � re 6 � -IU 0 0 to • w J H CO W w 0 u- ¢ z H. w Z = h 0 Z 1— w U O 2 0 I- = w !- O w U !-- P O ~ Z APR 15 '03 02:47PM TUKWILA DCII /PW dun -' 17 n 't Thu - 07/11/ 08:15 PM 02 -4449 Right Angle E->W N->E 0 2 Sun -07/28/2002 02:25 PM 02 -4792 Rear End "W Prk 0 P Wed - 08/14/2002 10:00 AM 02.5191 Righ Angle N - >E W - >E 0 P 2 � u- 08/29/2002 04:02 PM 02 -5548 Right Angle N - >E W - >E 0 P 2 0 P 2 >W _ N - f at 10/05/2002 05:04 PM 02 - 6382 Rear End N - >E 0 P 2 W - > Sun - 10/20/2002 03:30 PM 02 -6764 Rear End E W Wed - 10/30/2002 04 ;41 PM 02 - 7010 Approach Turn W - > >W 0 P 2 2 2 Sun- 11/10/2002 02:50 PM 02 -7285 Rear End E E 0 p Prk 0 P Tue 12/10/2002 05:30 PM 02 - 8090 Sideswipe Number of Collisions: 18 Grand Totals: Number of Collisions: 40 . Number of Vehicles involved: 86 Number of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%)--' Number of Injuries: 10/11 (25.00 %) . . Number of ADCs: 30 (75.00 %).. Collision Rate: 0.00 t ? Page2 s • • P.12/12 Totals: 0 4 15 1 37 O to 4A.. 0001 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR1HAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Search Metro Online - - - - -• G ' 000143 f King County • Bus - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Fare information - Retail outlets - Popular destinations - DART Information - How to ride Metro - Metro Bus Tunnel - Waterfront streetcar - Ride Free area - Adverse weather • Rideshare • Park G Ride • Bike • Accessible Services • Custom Bus • Jobs Access Transportation • Other Transportation Options Home You are in: Travel Options > Bus > Neighborhoods > Southcenter Travel Options Southcenter Neighborhood Bus Routes This symbol, following a route number, indicates the route serves a Sounder Commuter Rail Station. Visit the Sounder web site [external link] for train schedules and fare information. • Select a highlighted bus route for schedule information. Day(s) of the week the route runs are in parentheses. Dews Services Com Search A �+r ►rte . !-011 tl . Trip Planner `Pass SaI Tiinetdbles Go 39 (Weekdays, Saturday, Sunday) Route Map Downtown Seattle, SODO, Beacon Hill, VA Hospital, Seward Park, Rainier Beach, Southcenter Shuttle service on Sundays, connecting Dawson the VA Medical Center to routes 9atr Wy S a S Alaska, Beacon Av S and to and from downtown Seattle. 124 (Weekdays) Route Map Tukwila P &R, Gateway Corporate Center, Allentown, Tukwila, Southcenter 128 (Weekdays, Saturday, Sunday) Route Map Admiral District, West Seattle Junction, South Seattle Community College, White Center Transfer Point, Highline Speciality Medical Center, Riverton Heights, Southcenter 140 (Weekdays, Saturday, Sunday) Route Map Burien Transit Center, Sea -Tac Airport, McMicken Heights, Southcenter, South Renton P &R, Renton Transit Center. Route #r NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Pi ^lof2 000 L44r:: Home I Travel Options i Online I Updates i programs I Customer Services I About Metro l Site Map ©1994 -2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit Is a division of the King County Department of Transportation Updated: September 27, 2002 King County I New I e_.1vices I Com, nD is Search Links to County wab spas wb pag es you constitute expressly e a d ee to be bound by terms and conditions this of the site. r King Cunty \\es, y t detaUS., j Kt (Weekdays, Saturday, Sunday) Route Map • Downtown Seattle (Tunnel), SODO, Tukwila P &R, Southcenter, Kent Boeing, Kent Transit Center, Regional Justice Center, Kent Commuter Rail Station, Auburn P &R, Auburn Transit Center, Auburn Commuter Rail Station 155 (Weekdays, Saturday) Route Map Fairwood, Cascade Vista, Valley Medical Center, Southcenter 280 (Nightly) Route Map Night Owl Service, S Renton P &R, Tukwila, l -5, Downtown Seattle, SR -520, Bellevue Transit Center, Coal Creek Pkwy Freeway Station, Kennydale, Renton C.7_. / // - '.1 T1l1r'TT?. gr, I TI C' t'T TTTIL 1\T rt' AT (NT T) I' nr'T.tC't,. —^ NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. FD2of ; Met 'oute 1 timetable, Weekday 000.145 . •Tirnetables - Fare information - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Holiday information • Trip Planner • MyBus • BusView • Rideshare • Traffic & Roads Home News ` 1� ► Fe.1•0aY �'.. .�"�°" Services 124 Weekday: Feb. 1 thru June 6, 2003 • Read the Adverse Weather Info for this route. (Weekday): Andover Pk Interurban W & Av S & Baker 52nd Av S 6:30am 6:42amD 7:30am 7 :42amD 8:30am. 8:42amD 3:30pm 3:43pm 4:30pm 4:43pm 5:30pm 5:43pm 6:30pm 6:42pm Comments Search Search Metro Online Pacific Hwy S & S 112th 6:48am . 7:48am 8:48am 3:48pm 4:48pm 5:48pm 6:47pm E Marginal Way S & S 121st 6:52am 7:52am 8:52am 3:52pm 4:52pm 5:52pm Timetable Symbols B Gateway Center, , Interurban Ave S & Gateway Dr, 3-4 Interurban Ave S & Gateway Dr, 2 minutes minutes earlier. later. D - Serves Gateway C Interurban Andover Pk Av S & W & 52nd Av S Baker 6:58amB 7:58amB 8:58amB 3:59pmB 4:59pmB 5:59pmB 7 :09am 8:09am 9:09am 4:10pm 5:10pm 6:10pm NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Tr` 1. oft r -+ Met 'oute L fimetable, Weekday 0001.40 Select Another Route Number: Eliigr Home (TrrveI.Qption I Online Tools I Updates I from= I Customer Services I About Metro I Site Man © 1994-2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit is a division of the King County Department of Transportation King County I News I Services I Comm: Tip. I Search Unks to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. 3 tal!a+ •!: NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Met -- oute 1 ...Timetable, Weekday Comments METRO. A rzrra Search Metro Online A Nom p : .. Trip Planner -Pass Sales King County 000 t47: •Timetables - Fare Information - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Holiday information • Trip Planner • MyBus • BusView • Rldeshare • Traffic & Roads Home 128 News . lmq.t1 i : . a 1 Services Weekday: Feb. 1 thru June 6, 2003 • Read the Adverse Weather Info for this route. Find Route it I. .. 1 '�6+Ld! Search To SOUTHCENTER (Weekday): ' California East on SW Delridge Wy S Seattle 15th Av SW SW & Alaska St at SW & Community SW Lander 44th Av SW SW Orchard College SW Roxbury 4:55am 5:05am 5:14amB - -- 5:20am 5:18am 5:28am 5:37am 5:41am 5:50am 5:47am• 5:57am 6:06am 6:10am • 6:19am 6:17am 6:28am 6:37am 6:41am 6:50am 6:47am 6:58am 7:08am 7:12am 7:21am 7:46am 7 :27am 7:37am 7:41am 7:50am 7:46am 7:57am 8:08am 8 :12am 8:21am 8:13am 8:24am 8:35am 8:39am 8:48am 8:44am 8:55am 9:06am 9:10am 9:19am 9:15am 9:25am 9:36am 9:40am 9 :49am 9:45am 9:55am 10:06am 10:10am 10:19am 10:15am 10:25am 10:36am 10:40am 10:49am 10:45am 10:55am 11:06am 11:10am 11:19am 11:15am 11:25am 11:36am 11:40am 11:49am Military S Andover & & S 128th Bak 5:34am 6:04am 6:33am 7:04am 7:35am 8:04am 8:35am 9:02am 9:33am 10:03am 10:33am 11:03am 11:33am 12:03pm NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ''�` of 5:47a 6:17a 6:46a 7:17a 7:48a 8:17a 8:48a 9:15a 9:46a 10:16a 10:46a 11:16a 11:46a 12:17g .11 0 • E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E ID PI a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a in in Ill to Ut dt Vt tO tO O CO N d' N N N N N CO d• ri Vt r-I Vt 1-1 Vt e-1 dt r 1 111 N dt r-1 d' r-t dt 1-1 Vt r-I Vt r-I N N ri r-I N N M M tit Vt 111 tfl tO tO t.- N CO CO 01 01 ri r-I r-I .Y i O N rn r-1 f ~ ~ co y vcti 1 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa t- t- N N t- t- N 01 N 01 M M O to to to t0 t0 to t0 N r-1 d• r-1 ' r-1 Vt r-I d• r-I U) N Ul rI d' r-1 ri r-I V' N 1-I r•) N N M M '4' dt Ul to to to t-- N O co Ol 0l O O 1-4 r•1 r-i E E E EEEEEE E E E E E E E E E E E E a a a at a a a a a a a a a a a a . a a a a a tO to t0 to to to to CO tO CO N N a1 tD tO t0 tO tO t0 to N O 1'M O M O M O M O M r•1 dt O M O MOM O M O N N r4 r-I N N M M c VI Ul in t0. t0 N N co co 01 01 0 r-I ri ri 0 aaaaawaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Ul to In Ul Ul tll Ul N Ul N r-I ri co Ul t l N N N N N CO U1 N to N to N In N In (V O M Ul N Ul N Ul N Ul N U1 ri N N ri ri N N M M •t Ul Ifl Ul to to N N co co at a1 r-I r-1 r-I 44 tnb idid idididid idididiiaa •rt a Ul Ul N ri co M N N N N M M fr1 fM M •l O M I--1 V O dt ri 11 V' ri ri dt 1-1 N U U) N N co CO at 01 O O r-I r-I N N ri ri N rl rI r-1 r-I r-I r-I 3 Z U) 0 01 a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4 bm (U (UMI a aa M M M M M M M in M Ul a, ON to M M in M M M M Vt 0 co N '41 M O Ul Ul U1 Ul Ul in t[1 to Ul in M O M O M O M O M O M O i 0 MOM O M O M 4 Ul N O M O M O M 0 M O Ml O M 0 N .-I r1 IN N M M •t Vt Ul tll tO to N N O co 01 at O O vi • U) tO N CO CO 01 01 O O r-I r-I N N r1 1-1 N •-1 1-1 r-I Vt 1-1 r-I r-1 I-I ri rI 'CI E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E'E E E t, x E E E g 5 E 5 E 5 E E E 555 aaaa aaa aaa a aaaaaaaaa a 'o C) (Uro m m ro(a O1 O1 01 01 01 O1 at r-1 0■ ri Ul In N 01 01 M 01 a1 01 01 0 -.1 3 I4 0 t Vt M O Ul tll Ul Ul Ul to Ul to Ul to r•t vi ri V r•1 Vt r1 Ul ri Ul N Ul N d• r-1 Vt r•1 dt r1 Vt N k U) 0 Ul r-I Ul N tO N Ul N t'l N Ul N Ul N In rI N N t••I '-I N N M M'' Vt Ul Ul to to ts N CO O at a1 0 Q) 3 to N N co t al at O 0 r-I ri N N ri ri 1 .1 ' -t r-1 Q U) r-I r-I '-I •♦ r•I ri co a t i E E E E E E E E E E 00 • EE E E E•E E E E g w E00E000EEE00 a m m m ��� a aaa O 0 0 0 0 O O N O N t0 t0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r•I Q) r-I N V r-I 0 N N N N N N N N N N N 1-1 d' r•1 'dt ri Vt r-I Vt ri Vt 1-1 Vt r1 •t 11 d' ri 'dt r-1 d• r1 CO 0 V r-1 Ul N Vt N Ul N Ul N Ul N Ul N Ul N N 1-4 r I N N in M V' Cr Ul 111 t0 t0 N N CO O 01 01 O CO U U to N N O O 01 al O O ri t-I N N I-1 r-I ri e-t r•1 r-1 r-I r-1 ( r r U) 0 a.a x b ro (U b aaaa 0 al to M N 01 V' d' • i' Vt Vt Vt dt Vt •t V 4 P • M O V4 r-1 M ri Vt f-I ' ' ri 'di r-I Vt r•1 ' ' U1 ' $ to N N CO O 01 01 O O t-I ri N N r-I ri r-4 Cr) r-I r4 r-I t1 rl r-I U) .� roLS N bbbggg aaaa u r-I t0 M O O1 t0 r•l ra ri ri r l r♦ ri rt .-I ri r 1 N tf1 M Ul NOM O M O M co M O M r Cl) •• •• •• •• •• •• •• .• •• •• •• •• •• •• •- -r1 tO to N N CO al 01 O O r-I r-I N N r♦ r-I ri r-1 ri r1 ri r-t x 1. - 4 a a a Q) «I 11 COU1V r +tOtOt0UttoU1Uldt y r-I O �N r-I .4 r i Vt r i t} r•1 V r i V ri t0 t0 t� co co 01 at r-t ri /-I ri 1-1 r-•1 • C z I f' tf' 0 00 Lu J u- W a 2 LL Q a 1- w z I- 0 Z F- W W U O — o F- W W LL. •• z W U = O F- z • Metr oute 14. i imetable, Weekday 000149 1:44pm 2:14pm 2:44pm 3:14pm 3:44pm 4:14pm 4:44pm 5:14pm 5:44pm 6:17pm 6:48pm 7:19pm 7:49pm 8:08pm 8:40pm 9:10pm 9:40pm 2:01pm 2:31pm 3:01pm 3:31pm 4:01pm 4:31pm 5:01pm 5:31pm 6:01pm 6:34pm 7:05pm 7:35pm 8:05pm 8:24pm 8:56pm 9:25pm 9:55pm I_1r10 A 1.._ -1 2:14pm 2:44pm 3:14pm 3:44pm 4:14pm 4:44pm 5:14pm 5:44pm 6:14pm 6:47pm 7:18pm 7:48pm 8:18pm 8:37pm 9:09pm 9:38pm 10:08pm 2:22pm 2:52pm 3:22pm 3:52pm 4:22pm 4:52pm 5:22pm 5:52pm 6:22pm 6 :55pm 7:26pm 7:56pm 8:26pm 8:45pm 9:17pm 9 :46pm 10:16pm 2:25pm 2:55pm 3:25pm 3:55pm 4:25pm 4:55pm 5:25pm 5:55pm 6:25pm 6:58pm 7:29pm 7:59pm 8:29pm 8:48pm 9:20pm 9:49pm 10:19pm Timetable Symbols . B -Does not serve South Seattle Community College. or 16th Ave SW between the college and SW Dumar Way. Select Another Route Number: Home I Travel Options I 00 08 a Tools I Update* Programs I Customer Services I About Metro I SO Map ®1994 -2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit is a division of the King County Department pf Transportation King County I NP.B.4 I allildl es I L11lnle► t I asar.t. Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. u,e_dotaurt. 2:35pm 3:05pm 3:35pm 4:05pm 4:35pm 5:05pm 5:35pm 6:05pm 6:35pm 7:08pm 7:39pm 8:09pm 8:39pm 8:58pm 9:28pm 9:57pm 10:27pm NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Ft )3 of: 2:43p: 3:13g 3:43p: 4:13p: 4:43g 5 :13p: 5:43p: 6:12g 6:42p: 7 :15p: 7:46p: 8:16p: 8:46p: 9:05p: 9:35p: 10:04p: 10:34p: Mer — toute 14 _... imetable, Weekday 0001.50 S UMO : P/i ir ; Frt. f.... King County •Timetables - Fare Information - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Holiday Information • Trip Planner • MyBus • BusYlew • Rldeshare • Traffic & Roads Home 140 ( News Service; Comments Weekday: Feb. 1 thru June 6, 2003 • Read the Adverse Weather Info for this route. WI' l' I.1I41Y k `Ir ,' k iqI:gri. s lt` Search Find Rout * To BURIEN (Weekday): S 2nd S Grady Way Tukwila Andover Pk W Sea -Tac 4th Av SW & & Rail & (Bag Claim) & Burnett Av S Shattuck Mr Station Baker Bay -1 SW 150th S 5:33am 5:40am - -- 5:51am 6:05am 6:17am 5:53am: 6.00am 6:11am 6:26am 6:38am 6:05am 6:12am 6:23am 6:38am 6:50am 6:20am 6:27am 6:32am 6:39am 6:54am 7:06am 6:36am 6:43am 6:48am 6:55am 7:10am 7:23am 6:50amH 6:57amH 7:02amH 7:09amH 7:25amH 7:38amH 7:05am 7 :13am 7:18am 7:25am 7:41am 7:54am 7:20amH 7:28amH 7:33amH 7:40amH 7:56amH• 8:09amH 7:35am 7:43am 7:48am 7:55am 8:11am 8:24am 7.51am 7:59am - -- 8:11am 8:27am 8:40am 8:06am 8.14am 8:26am 8:42am 8:55am 8:25am 8:33am 8:45am 9:01am 9:13am 8:53am 9:01am 9:13am 9:29am 9:41am • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 000151 Met — loute I ..:Timetable, Weekday 9:23am _ 9:30am 9:54am 10:01am 10:24am 10:31am 10:54am 11:01am 11:24am 11:31am 11:54am 12:01pm 12:24pm 12:31pm 12:54pm 1:01pm 1:21pm 1:28pm 1:50pm 1:57pm 2:20pm 2:27pm 2:50pm 2:58pm 3:05pm 3:13pm 3:20pm 3:28pm 3:35pm 3:43pm 3:50pm 3:58pm 4:05pm 4:13pm 4:20pm 4:29pm 4:35pm 4:44pm 4:50pmH 4 :59pmH 5:05pm 5 :14pm 5:20pm 5:29pm 5:33pmH 5:42pmH 5:53pm 6:02pm 6:23pm 6:30pm 6:53pm 7:00pm 7:23pm 7:30pm 7:52pm 7:59pm 8:52pm 8:59pm 9:52pm 9:59pm •'4:49pm 5:04pmH 5:19pm 5:34pm 5:47pmH 6 :07pm 9:42am 9:58am 10:13am 10:29am 10:43am 11:00am 11:13am 11:30am 11:43am 12:00pm 12:13pm 12:30pm 12:43pm 1:00pm 1:13pm 1:30pm 1:40pm 1:57pm 2:09pm 2:26pm 2:39pm 2:56pm 3:10pm 3:28pm 3:25pm 3:44pm 3:40pm 3:59pm 3:55pm 4:14pm 4:10pm 4:30pm 4:25pm 4:45pm 4:41pm 5:02pm 4:56pm 5:18pm 5:11pmH 5:33pmH 5:26pm 5:47pm 5:41pm 6:02pm 5:54pmH 6:14pmH 6:14pm 6:32pm 6:42pm 6:59pm 7:11pm 7:28pm 7:41pm 7 :58pm 8:10pm 8:27pm 9:10pm 9:27pm 10:10pm 10:27pm 10,: loam 10:41am 11:15am 11:45am 12:12pm 12:42pm 1:12pm 1:42pm 2:09pm 2:38pm 3 :09pm 3:41pm 3:57pm 4:12pm 4:28pm 4:44pm 4:59pm 5:16pm 5:32pm 5:46pmH 6:00pm 6:15pm 6:27pmH 6:44pm 7:11pm 7:40pm 8:10pm 8:39pm 9:39pm 10:39pm To RENTON (Weekday): 4th Av SW Sea -Tac Andover Pk W Tukwila S Grady Way S 2nd Av & (Bag Claim) & Rail & & SW 150th Bay -2 Baker Station Shattuck Av Burnett Av S S 5:26am 5:38am 5:52am 6:03am 6:09am 5:50am 6:02am 6:16am - -- 6:27am 6:33am 6:13am 6:25am 6:39am 6:44am 6:52am 6:58am 6:28amH 6:40amH 6:54amH 6:59amH 7:07amH 7 :l3amH 6:43am 6:55am 7:09am• 7:14am 7:22am 7:28am NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ID 2 of 0 rel LT) 8 Ps • tV 1 0 n3n3atcdrob atroa�fanoaaaaaaaaaaaaa Vt 01 m 01 Vt O U1 O to ttl to 01 0l O O t0 t0 CO O O N Ul N Vt N •t 1-'1 0 CO N CO N N rl rl N N N N dt to r1 N V 0 ri CO 'cif r-1 *Of 0 CO e-1 dt O Crl 0 M O (NI (•1 Ul O N M to r♦ (NI Vt to r♦ N 'cr ri ' ri rr r'1 S CO O CO 01 al al 01 0 0 ri r-1 N N rl r-1 N N M CO M ('el Vt 'Cr Vt Vt l(l U) to to l0 1.0 (0 1- S CO al 0 r♦ rt rl 1-1 r1 r♦ r-1 rts b KS b aaaaa'aaaaaaaaaa as aaaaaaa N N l0 N S C`•1 0l Vt ON al 01 (rl /r1 Vt *zit 0 0 N N r1 V) CO If) ( - Vt l0 C7 N O tO ri tf') O U7 Ul t0 t0 l0 •0 /r1 U1 0 N (r1 tf1 O N t•1 O n O Yh O m O m O (r1 O ri• N Vt U1 r1 N Vt O N m to O N rn 0 (n O O O C� ( - CO CO co CO 01 0, 01 O 0 ri r1 N N r1 r-1 N N CO M M N M .01 •t t 1 Ul U1 Ul t0 l0 10 N ( - CO at 0 a-i ri 1-1 ri e-1 r I 1-1 1 g 5WE5W PI PI P4 Pi 01 `Cr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'Cr N' (r1 N I 1 1 1 1 1 1 N Vt 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ul ri N Vt Ul 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 •• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S •Ct U1 U1 141 111 aaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa V1 Ol m 01 Vt O t0 1 l0 t0 t0 0 0 H ri r- 01 CO 1'- rl V r1 ("'1 0 N as CO l0 r♦ r- r-$ CO m V' to LO Ul tf1 N U) O N Vt t ) r1 N tf) N tf) N Ul N Vt r-1 Vt r1 Vt O r1 M Vt O f-1 N V• O N Al Ul O N Ul N Ul t l in (� (� N CO CO W CO 01 al 01 0 0 r1 r1 N N 1-1 r1 N N C•1 C7 M ('5 •dt VI U1 U1 U1 Ul l0 1.0 t0 N S CO 01 r 1 ri r1 ri t-1 ri r (a al Gi o a aaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaa 01 'Cr CO 'Cr CO Ul r1 LO N N N t0 •t t(1 to ri r♦ (rl N 1-1 u7 CO U1 I■ VI l0 m N 0 U1 ri 111 N r - O rl ri r♦ rl O N (rl Ul 0 N VI to r♦ r♦ el 0 M O M O M.0 (5 cif Ul r1 N •t LC) r1 M (1) O N CO If) 0 Vt ri Vt Vt Vt N r- CO CO co CO O1 01 0 0 rl rl N Cl r1 ri N N N N M M m rn •t Vt Vt Ul 111 to U) l0 l0 ('- N CO 01 ri ri rl r1 ri e-1 ro a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aaaaaaa (� V' 000 V' 0'. 01ri0Ol(n'13 NV ri en0 r- u'0 l0001V'c-01 Ul ri N •t Ul rl N a O (+5 O N U) N If) r1 VI N 111 rl ('5 Vt O T - 1 m 44 O rl fr1 Ul 0 N ('1 111 N tf1 N N (V .• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• .• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• .. •• •• •• 10 (� N t- N 0 0 CO CO al Q1 O O O ri ri N N r♦ rf N N N fr) M M (5 •• Vt Vt Vt tf) in U) U) l0 l0 (" co 0) r1 r-1 r•1 r 1 r i r ri Met - .oute 1'.. :Timetable, imetable, Weekday -�z H- Operates Presidents' Day, Feb. 17. Select Another Route Number:•- 000.53 Home I TreveLQptions I Online Tools I Updates I Programs I Customer Services I About Metro I Site Map ©1994 -2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit Is a division of the King County Departm@nt of Trar]sportatlon King County I RM. I aelyko I QQC.ILW..DLS I ae &Qt1 Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The_del&115. /L.... /.."1,.,1”1nn 101 AA n i.r...l NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Py"P 4ofL. ) Met — ''.out 50 Timetable, Weekday 000154 King County Search Metro Online um .T'rla'R�ari'ier °`Pass:Sales . ,s, :�:i: F.`' •Timetables - Fare Information. - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Holiday information • Trip Planner • MyBus • BusVlew • Rideshare • Traffic & Roads Home 150 News Weekday: Feb. 1 thru June 6, 2003 • Be sure to read the 5p_ecial Service Info for this route. ll�et'1. ` ? 4.. � 4 ..: i Ej a.:'fi�;`: "Jl:1s To KENT, AUBURN (Weekday): 7th Av Stewart n.. I 1 ..1 I .1 ,rn n i. i Services 3rd Av Union Commen Convention. Place Station Search University Station Bay -C 5:17am 5:21am 5:31am 5:35am 5:43am 5:47am 5:59am 6:03am 6:13am 6:17am 6:29am 6:33am 6:43am 6:47am 6:59am 7:03am 7:15am 7:19am 7:32am 7:36am 7:46am 7:50am 8:02am 8:06am 8:32am 8:36am 9 :03am - 9:07am 9:33am 9:37am Find Route # iJE+d:(J Busway S Spokane 5:30am 5:44am 5:56am 6:13am 6:27am 6:43am 6:57am 7:13am 7:29am 7:46am 8:00am 8:16am 8:46am 9:17am 9:47am 52nd Av S Andover & w Interurban S Bak 5:41am 5:55am 6:07am 6:24am 6:38am 6:54am 7:08am 7:24am 7:40am 7:57am 8:11am 8:27am 8:57am 9:29am 9:59am NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 5:49a 6:03a: 6:16a 6:33a 6:47a: 7:03a 7:17a 7:33a 7:50a 8:07a 8:21a 8:37a 9:07a 9:39a 10:09a Met` — '.ou f : 50 Timetable, Weekday Want 6:43pm 6:48pm 6:54pm 6:59pm 7:25pm 7:30pm 7:55pm 8:00pm 8:26pm 8:31pm 8:55pm 9:00pm 9 :26pm 9:31pm 9:56pm 10:01pm 10:26pm 10:31pm 10:56pm 11:01pm 11:29pm 11:34pm 12:29am 12:34am 1:17am 1:22am To SEATTLE (Weekday): 10:03am 10:07am 10:17am 10:29am 10:39a 10:35am 10:39am 10:49am 11:01am 11:11a 11:05am 11:09am 11:19am 11:31am 11:41a 11:33am 11:37am 11:47am 11:59am 12:09p: 12:01pm 12:05pm 12:15pm 12:27pm 12:40p: 12 :31pm 12:35pm 12:45pm 12:57pm 1:lOp: 1:01pm 1:05pm 1:15pm 1:27pm 1:40p: 1:32pm 1_:36pm 1:46pm 1:58pm 2:11p: 2:00pm 2:04pm 2.14pm 2:26pm 2:39p: 2:17pm 2:21pm 2:31pm 2:43pm 2:56p: 2:31pm 2:35pm 2:45pm 2:57pm 3:10p: 2:47pm 2:51pm 3:01pm 3:13pm 3_26p: 3:03pmH 3:07pmH 3:17pmH 3:29pmH 3:42p: 3:18pm 3:22pm 3:32pm 3:44pm 3:57p: 3:34pm 3:38pm 3:48pm 4:00pm 4:13p: 3:52pm 3:56pm 4:06pm 4:18pm 4:31p: 4:06pm 4:10pm 4:20pm 4:32pm 4:45p: 4:19pm 4:23pm 4:33pm 4:45pm 4:58p: 4 :32pm 4:36pm 4:46pm 4:58pm 5:llp: 4:56pm 5:00pm 5:10pm 5:22pm 5:35p: 5:05pm 5:09pm 5:19pm 5:31pm 5:44p: 5:19pm 5:23pm 5:33pm 5:45pm 5:58p: 5:33pm 5:37pm 5:47pm 5:59pm 6:12p: 5:50pm 5:54pm 6:04pm 6:15pm 6 :27p: 6:04pm 6:08pm 6:18pm 6:29pm 6:41p: 6:20pm 6:24pm 6:34pm 6:45pm 6:56p: 6:32pm 6:36pm 6:46pm 6:57pm 7:08p: 7:01pm 7:12pm 7:22p: __- 7:12pm 7:23pm 7:33p: 7:43pm 7:54pm 8:03p: 8:13pm 8:24pm 8:33p: 8:44pm 8:55pm 9:04p: 9:13pm 9:24pm 9:33p: 9:44pm 9:55pm 10 :03p: 10:14pm 10:25pm 10:33p: 10:44pm 10:55pm 11:03p: 11:14pm 11:25pm 11:33p: 11:47pm 11:58pm 12:06a 12:46am 12:57am 1:05a 1:34am 1:44am 1:52a NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Met -- Rot. . i50 Timetable, Weekday 0001.5'6 2nd St SW & Transit Roadway 4:54am 5:24am 5:52amH 6:20amH 6:47amH 7:17amH 7:51am 8:21am 8:52am 9:25am 9:55am 10:24am 10:56am 11:26am 11:55am 12:26pm 12:57pm 1:26pm 2:59pm 3:29pm 4:00pm 4:31pm 1,.. .. Lela ........ /.... /1.••../ ..t..a..i . 1 CA IN 1.._.1 15th St NE Central Av & & A St NE E Meeker 5:02am 5:32am 6:00amH 6:31amH 6:59amH 5:16am 5:46am 6:14amH 6:48amH 7:16amH 7 :29amH 7:46amH 8:03am .•8:19am 8:33am 8:49am 9 - :03am 9 :19am 9:35am 9 :51am 10:05am 10:21am 10:34am 10:50am 11:06am 11:23am 11:36am 11:53am 12:05pm 12:22pm 12:37pm 12:54pm 1:08pm 1:25pm 1:38pm 1:55pm 1:57pm 2:09pm 2:26pm 2:27pm 2:39pm 2:56pm 3:11pm 3:28pm 3:41pm 3:59pm 4:12pm 4:30pm 4:43pm 5:02pm Lincoln Av Andover Park N -& W & W James Strander 5:05am 5:21am 5:35amH 5:51am 6:05amH 6:19amH 6:36amH 6:53amH 7:06amBH 7:21amH 7:24amDH 7:36amBH 7:51amH 8:06am 8:24am 8:54am 9:24am 9:56am 10:26am 10:55am 11:29am 11:59am 12:28pm 1:00pm 1:31pm 2:Olpm 2:15pm 2:32pm 2:46pm 3:02pm 3:16pm 3:34pm 3:47pm 4:05pm 4:19pm 4:36pm 4:50pm 5:08pm 5:20pm 5:21am 5:37am 5:51amH 6:07am 6:23amH 6:37amH 6:55amH 7:12amH 7:25amH 7:40amH 7:55amH 8:10amH 8:25am 8:43am 9:13am 9:43am 10:16am 10:46am 11:15am 11:50am 12:20pm 12:49pm 1:21pm 1:52pm 2:22pm 2:36pm 2:53pm 3:07pm 3:24pm 3:38pm 3:56pm 4:08pm 4:26pm 4:40pm 4:57pm 5:11pm 5:29pm 5:41pm NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR - THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 52nd Av S Busw & & Interurban S S Spo 5:29am 5:39a 5:45am 5:55a 5:59amH 6:09a 6:15am 6:25a 6:31amH 6:43a 6:45amH 6:57a 7:03amH 7:17a 7:21amH 7:35a 7:34amH 7:48a 7:49amH 8:03a 8.:04amH 8:18a 8:19amH 8:33a 8:34am ' 8:47a 8:52am 9:05a 9:22am 9:34a 9:52am 10:04a 10:26am 10:37a 10:56am 11:07a 11:25am 11:36a 12:00pm 12:11p: 12:30pm 12:43p: 12:59pm 1:12p: 1:32pm 1:45p: 2:03pm 2:16p: 2:33pm 2:46p: 2:47pm 3:OOp: 3:04pm 3:17p: 3:18pm 3:31p: 3:35pm 3:49p: 3:49pm 4:03p: 4:07pm 4:21p: 4:19pm 4:33p: 4:37pm 4:51p: 4:51pm 5:05p: 5:08pm 5:21p: 5:22pm 5:35p: 5:40pm 5:53p: 5:52pm 6:05p: Met -� �.oii; -50 Timetable, Weekday 000157 4:56pm 5:08pm 5:30pm 5:56pm 6:26pm 6:56pm 7:23pm 7:54pm 8:24pm 8:54pm 9:22pm 9:52pm 10:52pm 11:54pm Timetable Symbols §- Estimated time. B- Serves Kent Commuter Rail Station on W Smith St at Railroad Ave 3 minutes earlier. . D -To SKCAC Industries (Russell Rd & 58th PI S), arriving there 10 minutes later. Bus travels via West Valley Rd. G -Bus leaves SKCAC Industries at this time. Travels via 58th PI S, S 194th St, 62nd Ave S, S 196th St and West Valley Rd to Kent Transit Center, arriving 11 minutes later. - H- Operates Presidents' Day, and south In on 3rd Ave, (to downtown) northton (to 3rd Ave Auburn) west on Stewart St and east on Olive Way. Special Service Info • Route 150 provides daily service to Auburn, Kent, Southcenter and downtown Seattle. • Route 151 provides daily service to Auburn and SE Auburn. • Route 152 provides weekday peak hour service between Enumclaw, Auburn, Star Lake (1 -5 & S 272nd St) and downtown Seattle. • Route 153 provides weekday service between Kent and Renton. • For local service between Green River Community College, Auburn and Federal Way, or service between Enumclaw, Auburn, Algona and Pacific City, refer to the 181, 915 and 917 timetables. • For local service between Kent and Green River Community College, or Kent and 5:40pm 6:06pm 6:36pm 7:05pm 7:31pm 8:Olpm 8:31pm 9:01pm 9:29pm 9:59pm 10:59pm 12:01am 5:26pm 5:32pm 5:51pm 6:02pm 6:15p: 5:47pm 6:06pm 6:17pm 6:29p: 5:58pm 6:04pm 6:22pm .6:33pm 6:43p: 6:23pm 6:28pm 6:46pm 6:57pm 7:07p: 6:51pm 6:56pm 7:14pm 7:23pm 7:33p: 7:18pm 7:23pm 7:39pm 7:47pm 7:57p: 7:43pm 7:48pm 8:04pm 8:12pm 8:22p: 8:13pm 8:18pm 8:34pm 8:42pm 8:52p: 8:43pm 8:48pm 9:04pm 9:12pm 9:22p: 9:13pm 9:17pm 9:32pm 9:40pm 9:50p: 9:41pm 9:45pm 10:00pm 10:08pm 10:18p: 10:11pm 10:15pm 10:30pm 10:38pm 10:48p: 11:11pm 11:15pm 11:30pm 11 :38pm 11:48p: 12:13am 12:17am 12:32am 12:40am 12:50a NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. r ' . Me +•— 'tout:; 150 Timetable, Weekday 0001.58 Renton, refer to the 164/169 timetable. mue' Select Another Route Number: Home I Travel Options I Online Tools I Updates I Programs I Customer Services I About Metro I $ite Map © 1994-2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit is a division of the King Cqupty Department of Transportation King County ( N_ews ( Servloee I Comments I search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to bee. b ound by terms and conditions of the site. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. : _55 Timetable, Weekday METRO online 7 - ---- _. M� Search Metro Online 0 Trip Planner ' Pass•.Sales 0001.59 King County • Timetables - Fare Information - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Holiday Information • Trip Planner • MyBus • BusVlew • Rideshare • Traffic & Roads Home 155 5:10am 6:10am 7:10am: 8:10am 9:10am 10:1Dam 11:10am 12:10pm News Weekday: Feb. 1 thru June 6, 2003 • Read the Adverse Weather Info for this route. , liTifgrafAL To SOUTHCENTER (Weekday): 140th Av SE SE 177th 5:15am 6:15am 7:16am 8:16am 9:16am 10:16am 11:16am 12:16pm 12:57pm 1:59pm 2:59pm 3:59pm 4:59pm 5:59pm t 1 • , . ,. r n • • Services Comments 156th Av SE 140th Av SE & SE & Fairwood SE 177th 1:22pmD 2:22pmD 3:22pmD 4:22pmD 5:22pmD 6:22pmD Search Find Route # 'lam 116th Av SE SE 168th 5:28am 6:28am 7:30am 8:30am 9:30am 10:30am 11:30am 12:30pm 1:29pm 2:29pm 3:29pm 4:29pm 5:29pm 6:29pm Talbot S S Carr 5:35am 6:35am 7:37am 8:37am 9:37am 10:37am 11:37am 12:37pm 1:36pm 2:36pm 3:36pm 4:36pm 5:36pm 6:36pm Andover Pk W Tukwila Pkwy 5:55am 6:55am 7:59am 8:59am 10:00am 11:00am 12:00pm 1:00pm 1:59pm 2:59pm 3:59pm 4:59pm 5:59pm 6:58pm NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. i ) 1 2 0001_60 Mer'.ou. 155 Timetable, Weekday To FAIRWOOD (Weekday): Andover Pk W Baker 6:12am 7:12am 8:12am 9:12am 10:12am 11:12am 12:12pm 1:12pm 2:12pm 3:12pm 4:12pm 5:12pm 6:12pm krtr.• //tr!ncit mptriller rtnv /tnnc/hnc /orhp lnlac/c1 GC rl html Talbot S S Carr 6:35am 7:35am 8:35am 9:36am 10:36am 11:36am 12:36pm 1:37pm 2:37pm 3:37pm 4:37pm 5:37pm 6:37pm 116th Av SE 140th Av SE 156th Av SE -140th Av SE & & & SE ' & SE 168th SE 177th Fairwood SE 177th st 6:41am 7:41am 8:41am 9 :42am 10:42am 11:42am 12:42pm 1 :44pm 2:44pm 3:44pm 4 :44pm 5:44pm ' Timetable Symbols B- Arrives at this time. Leaves about 20 minutes later to continue through Fairwood loop. D- Leaves at this time. Arrives about 8 minutes earlier. Select Another Route Number: ow a ':J Home I Travel Options I Online Tools I Updates I Programs I Customer Services I About Metro I Site Mao ®1994 -2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit is a division of the King County Department of Transportation King County I New I Sin log I Amme.[lts. I .8sLargb Unks to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The,dat4ils, 6:49amB 7:49amB 8:49amB 9:50amB 10:50amB 11:50amB 12:57pm 1:59pm 2:59pm 3:59pm 4:59pm 5:59pm 6:59pm 1:02pm 2 :04pm 3:04pm 4:04pm 5:04pm 6:04pm 7:04pm NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 2 • II fl .. ,...'' Mer 280 Timetable, Weekday 000161 • Timetables - Fare Information - Regional & area maps - Neighborhood routes - Holiday Information • Trip Planner • My Bus • Bus View • Rideshare • Traffic & Roads Home Weekday: Feb. 1 thru June 6, 2003 • Be sure to read the $p_gcial_SArvice Info for this route. To TUKWILA, DOWNTOWN SEATTLE Night Owl service (Daily): SW Grady Way Interurban 4th Av S 4th Av S Av S & & Shattuck Av 52nd Av S S Spokane S Jackson 2:53am 4:08am To BELLEVUE, 2:05am 3:17am News 4th Av S S Jackson 3:02am 4:17am • — 7 .1 I II I ^no, •-■ . Services Comments 3:12am 4:27am RENTON Night Owl service (Daily): 4th Av Union 2:15amW 3:30amW On SR-520 At Montlake .2:23am 3:38am Search 3:17am 4:32am 2:35am 3:50am 4th Av Union 3:22am 4:37amG 108th Av NE SW .Grady Way NE 6th Shattuck Av S 2:53am 4:08am , • • • ■ • ...... NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. . 2 Met — Rout, 280 Timetable, Weekday 000 —62 n Timetable Symbols Special Service Info • , •• • G - To Metro Base, Airport Way S & S Atlantic St. W -Bus leaves at this time. it arrives 5 -8 minutes earlier. The below listed stops are provided on southbound 1 -405 (see map for locations). At all other locations, regular pick -up and drop -off service is provided. At 1 -405 "drop -off only" stops, you must notify the driver if you wish to deboard; no automatic pick -up service is otherwise provided at these stops. • NE 4th St (pick -up and drop -off) • SE 8th St (drop -off only) • Coal Creek Pkwy (pick -up and drop -off) • *Newport Hills/ 112th Ave SE (drop -off only) • N 30th St (pick -up and drop -off) Select Another Route Number: 111.9,03 Home I Travel Qptions I Onlln@Toals I Updates I Programs I Customer Services I About Metro I Site Map © 1994-2003, Metro Transit. Metro Transit is a division of the King County Department of Transportation King County I News I Services ( Comments I Selrcb Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree t by terms and conditions of the site. a NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • 1; .' 000 t63 r � Vi O o ad o p.a, 15 ?D :1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. I p, O Ojj164 182 (;27 ) )° .- 3.31 STATE OF WASHINGTON - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T R I P S S Y S T E M ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT FUNCT TRUCK PERCENTAGES 1998 1999 2000 2001 ROUTE COUPLET CLASS SNGL DBL TRIPLE TOTAL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS STATE ROUTE MILEPOST POST LOCATION AFTER JCT CO RD 3 3700 4100* 4100 4100 010.62 A 173 173 011.96 BEFORE JCT SR 97 WYE CONN 3 4600 3000* 3000 3000 STATE ROUTE NO 174 MAINLINE SR 17 /LEAHY TO SR 21 174 000.00 AFTER JCT SR 17 *BEG ROUTE 2 174 000.14 AFTER JCT P NE 2 174 019.55 BEFORE JCT SR 174 SPCRWNPT (SPUR) 2 174 019.55 AFTER JCT SR 174 SPCRWNPT (SPUR) 2 174 020.81 AFTER JCT E ST 2 174 021.43 BEFORE JCT SR 155 WYE CONN 2 174 021.51 AFTER JCT SR 155 WYE CONN 3 174 024.32 AFTER JCT PARR SERVICE RD 3 174 040.66 BEFORE JCT SR 21 3 STATE ROUTE NO 174 SPUR CRWNPT SR 174 TO CROWN PT VISTA 190 150* 150 150 174SPCRWNPT 019.55 AFTER JCT SR 174 *BEG ROUTE 3 STATE ROUTE NO 181 MAINLINE SR 516 /KENT TO SR 405 BEFORE JCT MEEKER ST 1 25000* 26000 AFTER JCT MEEKER ST 1 005.56 B 181 25000* 26000 BEFORE JCT S 228TH ST 1 005.56 A 181 30000* 31000 32000 26000' AFTER JCT S 228TH ST . 1 006.70 B 181 32000* 34000 34000 29000* AFTER JCT S 212TH ST 1 006.70 AF 181 29000 30000 31000 31000* 007.71 AF 181 181 34000* 35000 36000 32000* 009.75 BEFORE JCT S 180TH ST WYE CONN 1 181 009.76 AFTER JCT S 180TH ST 1 29000* 30000 31000 26000* STATE ROUTE NO 182 MAINLINE SR 82 TO SR 395 /PASCO 000.00 AT SR 82 *BEG ROUTE 5 PAGE 92 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME 500 500 500 550* 500* 500 500 570* 930 780* 770 780 1000 880* 880 880 1500* 1500 1500 1900* 1900 3500 3500 3100* 3100 1700* 1700 1700 1600• 1700* 6800 7000 6100' 7800* • BASED ON ACTUAL COUNT + SOURCE OF TRUCK PERCENTAGES NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. J 000165 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR - THAN THIS NOTICE IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.: 000 ti6 n n n n 1 I 1 1l NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ON 1_67 nnuc n ILI LI LI I LI NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. z • Z • § O 0 CO a W _1 Li j 0 • :7J U_ < I a 111 Z 0 ZI- W LLJ D 0 O I- 1 4 1 W - 0 r U_ 0 Lij Z O U) z F O I . : nrioir 1 LI LI LI I .1 4r : 4 4. ,..., 4. .•.4 .. zo.V1.....f-Lc,"7,....,",' •X•41 4 ; ;O : i .. -VA:"V ,--14s.-...t.t. .-.‘,4,re A"be:"4-474,•■Irk■rati;f4.---tV,,S. v .46.11 4-r .z Existing Site Access Outbound NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. .1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director JUNE 26, 2003 CITY OF TUJKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Eric Robb/Barghausen Consulting Engineers has filed an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan (File #L02 -067) and Zoning Code (File #L02 -068) maps at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. The existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation is Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant is requesting a rezone and Comprehensive Plan map amendment to Office (0). The Tukwila Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to give residents and businesses an opportunity to express their opinions and give testimony about the proposal: Date: Thursday, June 26, 2003 Time: 7 p.m. Place: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner of the Tukwila Depai uuent of Community Development at 206 - 431 -3683. Written comments are welcome. Please address comments to Rebecca Fox, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 or via e -mail to rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us. If desired, written comments may also be presented in person at the City Council meeting on June 26, 2003. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Plig LDR MDR MMUS gum. S153St ■ Q D R iD 0003200019 , ut ra ter glv RCM r Legend Zoning Designations Subject Properties rrf :r'. t '+ h1! : I u. *n GIS T ukwila N 1 " =.5 Mile LDR Low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential HDR High Density Residential TUC Tukwila Urban Center RCM Regional Commercial Mixed Use 0 Office Tukwila Blvd TUC TUC City of Tukwila Department of Community Development L02 -067 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Proposed) L02 -066 Zoning Code Amendment (Proposed) 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd Request Low Density Residential to Office NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I 1.5Z-/E. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: ) Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: ,EfUG 8,9 j ,g4c)J &) Project Number: Loa-067 Mailer's Signature: i Person requesting mailing: E 5P Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I 1.5Z-/E. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: ) Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /7 5/ day of JvA"E in the year 20 03 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM June 12; 2003 Mr. Gerald Schneider 6510 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr. and Mrs. Johnny 15460 65 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sincerely, 6 L. Jill Mosqueda enclosure (1) cc: Moira Bradshaw Jim Morrow Brian Shelton City Clerk City of Tukwila Departhzent of Public Works Mr. Kevin Klotz 6532 S. 154' St (Southcenter Blvd.) Tukwila, WA 98188 Ms. Mary Lamping Puget Sound Energy Real Estate Department MS OBC -1 1 N 411 108 Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 X02 SUBJECT: 3.40.55 Street Vacation — Macadam Road from Southcenter Boulevard to Old Bluff Road On August 15, 2002, the City Council passed Ordinance 1993 approving the vacation of Macadam Road from Southcenter Boulevard to Old Bluff Street,providing the conditions stipulated in Section 2 of the ordinance are met. A copy of the ordinance is enclosed. This vacation expires on September 30, 2003, if the conditions have not been met by this date. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206 - 433 -0179, Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM. (P:Laurie Admin /01/3.40.55 Expiration Letter Macadam) _ ^#�$RiRSWc�sa�'..D1 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor James E Morrow, P.E., Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite X100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 200.433 -0179 • Fax: 200-= 31.3005 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION /. 6 1, 44 6 COdc HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing ° I..) 11 I IL Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's Signature: -a- EAD47, ' Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other . •a . Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 1 Z day o fj (2/t -tin the year 2003 P:GINAWYNETTA /FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM t Project Name: p A , r - 1 / . & 2,9 1 e 7 A.! gild ■ ° I..) 11 I IL Project Number: 1-- 02-- O ce l I. ()2- — DUI Mailer's Signature: -a- EAD47, ' Person requesting mailing: a2,6C La. yC •a . Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 1 Z day o fj (2/t -tin the year 2003 P:GINAWYNETTA /FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Rebecca Fox - 10751 - Robb Rezone - . Distance Analysis Update From: "Dave Schwegel" <dschwegel @Barghausen.com> To: <bshelton @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 6/9/03 3:29PM Subject: 10751 - Robb Rezone - Sight Distance Analysis Update Brian: W fig, 6 J U: U0 CO w= Entering Sight Distance requirements are met for 10 feet behind the street. co u_ O Proposed Sight Distance Enhancement Measures include: 2 �. J (1) Berm excavation u- (2) Vegetation removal N a (3) Brick Wall reconstruction N = z t ... Additionally, a No Right Turn on Red sign may be installed. z 0 We trust this satisfies your request. j o U Feel free to call, fax, or email if questions. Thank you. O N' David M. Schwegel U tL O ..z w O z Barghausen Consulting Engineers /Survey measured the entering sight distance at the Southcenter Blvd /66th Ave S intersection in the City of Tukwila for the above - referenced project based on the drivers eye being 18 feet behind the street (Southcenter Blvd). The measured entering sight distance (looking left east) is 88 feet. David M. Schwegel Transportation Engineer Barghausen Consulting Engineers Phone: 425 - 656 -7424 Fax: 425-251-8782 Email: dschwegel @barghausen.com CC: <rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "hmattson" <hmattson @Barghausen.com >, <file @Barghausen.com> Harley Mattson Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. 18215 72 Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032 May 28, 2003 Dear Ms. Mattson: City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan change/Rezone at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Brian Shelton, Tukwila City Engineer, has completed his review of the transportation - related information which you provided. He has noted that the Traffic Impact Analysis does not address issues which were part of his request for transportation - related information. He also requests additional data. Please provide the following information by June 6,20003. In that way, the project can be placed on the June 26, 2003 Planning Commission as scheduled. Please provide the following previously requested information per the letter dated March 27, 2003 (enclosed) as follows: • 1.A.1 b &d, topography and driveway(s) location and grade for existing land use • 3.E. Driveway design; width (25 feet min.), throat length, grade, throat length • 3.F. Access alternatives • 3.G. 2. On -site circulation The report needs to provide additional information and discussion addressing existing conditions and proposed changes regarding vehicular ingress and egress including: • trucks, • alternative access to the property (from the west, for example), • ability to provide parking, • on -site circulation, driveway ingress /egress given the existing topographic conditions and property boundaries including retaining walls and steep slopes. Figure 5 should be revised to include site - related traffic volumes at Intersection E. Finally, the sight distance analysis should include evaluation based on 85` percentile 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Per my phone message to you, we need the complete information no later than June 6, 2003 to allow the Tukwila Planning Commission to place the project on the agenda for their June 26, 2003 meeting. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via e-mail at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions about this request. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. Cc Brian Shelton coviAt 0 4. ENGIN Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Fox: W !' �i% �t:' �1: L' ca;)- {:i7iil4'ct..' CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES May 16, 2003 COURIER DELIVERY RE: Boundary and Partial Topographic Survey Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment Application 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washingtoh City of Tukwila File Nos. E02 -024, L02-067, and L02 -068 Our Job No. 10751 On behalf of our client Mr. Eric Robb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., is submitting four copies of a boundary and partial topographic survey dated May 6, 2003. The survey is being sent in response to your request for additional information letter dated March 27, 2003, which requested a site survey showing the precise location of the existing buildings in relation to the property lines. It was further noted in the request that: "A complete topographic survey is not necessary at this time." Our client is currently negotiating a possible boundary line adjustment of the north property line of Tax Lot 19; therefore, our client, Mr. Robb, does not wish City staff to contact any neighboring property owners regarding the boundary line adjustment or encroachment issues. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (425) 251 -6222. Thank you. Respectfully, ),, c1 alt Harley attson bu Project Planner HBVIM /tep 10751c.006.doc enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Eric Robb Mr. Eric G. LaBrie, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 33 9 7 00 . , f1/4 L ., -L 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com RECEIVED MAY 16 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . J Harley Mattson Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. 18215 72 Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032 March 27, 2003 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan change /Rezone at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard Dear Ms. Mattson: As a result of the March 17, 2003 public meeting, the Tukwila City Council and Mayor have requested additional information to help them evaluate your client Eric Robb's request for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map changes from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) at 6542 and 6550 Southcenter Boulevard. Please provide the following information by April 21, 2003: • Site survey showing the precise location of the existing buildings in relation to the property lines. A complete topographic survey is not necessary at this time. • Traffic and access study containing the following: 1. Inventory Site conditions A. Existing land use 1. Site physical characteristics a. lot size(s), configuration, boundaries b. topography c. contours d. driveway(s) location and grade B. Proposed land use 1. Changed use 2. Other properties /developments in vicinity 2. Transportation system A. Existing right -of -way B. Street network including intersections and geometrics C. Site access point(s) D. Traffic volumes including turning movement counts E. Safety evaluation 1. Accident data, last 3 years Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 2. Sight distance 3. Development related traffic A. Trip generation, peak hour B. Trip distribution C. Trip assignment D. Driveway volumes including directional and turning movement E. Driveway design; width (25 feet min.), throat length, grade, throat length F. Access alternatives G. Potential site constraints 1. Parking requirements 2. on -site circulation H. Queuing analysis I. LOS analysis As we discussed by phone, we will need the complete information by April 21, 2003 so that the Tukwila Planning Commission will be able to place the project on the agenda for their May 22, 2003 meeting. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via e -mail at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions about this request. Sincerely, /i Rebecca Fox Senior Planner a:;�u:.Gt �;•,,:t �tiitc� ,;..;iu.as.�v;�Sui��r.::.t.:r :.� .,:v. " a�:. Yrts,•. A z _ I ;�— z : 1112 U 0) CI CO J E... N u- u O u. = • a I— w Z �. F— O Z I— CU uj O • ; CI I— w t=„ U L - 1 - - O CU U = : O H z City of Tukwila Eric RobblBargbausen Consulting Engineers has filed an application to amend the Comprehensive Plan (File #L02 -067) and Zoning Code (File #L02 -068) maps.at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. The existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation is Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant is requesting a rezone and Comprehensive Plan map amendment to Office (0). The Tukwila City Council will hold a public meeting to give residents and businesses an opportunity to express their opinions and give testimony about the proposal: - Date: Monday, March 17, 2003 Time: 7 p.m. Place: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner of the Tukwila Department of Community Development at 206 - 431 -3683. Written comments are welcome. Please address comments to Rebecca Fox, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 or via e -mail to rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us. If desired, written comments may also be presented in person at the City Council meeting on March 17, 2003. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 4 MARCH 17, 2003 PROJECT INFORMATION CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I I. L.,6,52_,/ HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: L02 7 Coup pc,arl /G. b � _ &GS 20N7rfc7 GoDE Determination of Non - Significance X Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application • Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 71% day of A'ARcmi n the year 20 03 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM z • cc 2 JU 00 U D J U) W o 1 ?. a . = w 1- _ z � I- o Z E-. w U o to 0— o I- w W �o w Z U = o 1 - . z Project Name: e_Rlc- Rogg/5AR�ZH_AusEtJ Project Number: L02 7 Coup pc,arl /G. b � _ &GS 20N7rfc7 GoDE Mailer's Signature: L . (7. Person requesting mailing: P RF f3 CCe,/ Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 71% day of A'ARcmi n the year 20 03 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM z • cc 2 JU 00 U D J U) W o 1 ?. a . = w 1- _ z � I- o Z E-. w U o to 0— o I- w W �o w Z U = o 1 - . z State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Sottthcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwilama.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I 1-1- fl k' L E\) M )1 i J `(PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on ,21 ay i o3 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 (Q) /( and t e other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at S p 4'2_- S. ( 'fh5", so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number ED 2_ — (24 L02- - Qep-4 - 1_D2 -04 I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applican or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me /y/ / .. /'YIl97`7 S'a&j to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this a 7 day of re.hroaf rG/ , cD oo OTARY P : LIC in and for the State of Washington Reivra11 My commission expires on 9 ' / 9 -09 residing at .r � etil I tk5x_1 February 4, 2003 Harley Mattson Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72 Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032 RE: Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment Application E02 -024, L02 -067, L02 -068 Dear Ms. Mattson: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Your application for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendment located at 6550 and 6542 S 154 Street has been found to be complete on January 23, 2003 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. Your proposal, along with two other proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be scheduled for a public meeting before the Tukwila City Council on March 17, 2003. The meeting will be held in the Tukwila City Council Chambers at 6200 Southcenter Boulevard at 7 p.m. The purpose of the public meeting is to give the City Council members information which will allow them to make a decision on whether or not they feel proposed amendments should be forwarded to the Planning Commission for further study, or whether they should be dropped without further consideration. At the public meeting, you may comment briefly on your proposal if you wish. Upon receipt of this letter, you will need to install the notice board on the site. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, please call me. Please stop by our office to pick up a laminated Notice of Public Meeting. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting from your application to our office. Although at this point it appears that your application is complete, this fording does not preclude the City from requiring you to submit additional plans or information, if we judge such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. Please contact me at (206- 431 -3683 if you have questions. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner C: \My Documents\Annual amendments COMP PLAN 2002- 2003 \NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION - -robb rezone.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Steven M Mullet, Mayor • DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM :WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Fidelity National Title Comp Li4 y of Washington iincfr.1:'ri."r,„ by Fidelity National Title 1:1 :{t:a:acP Compal4r 3500 288th Stre(t SW X4300 Lynnwood. Washington 98037 (206) 771 -3031 / 527 -1432 Fax No. (206) 670 -1462 Direct Line (206) 640 -3502 / 640 -350+ 1N3Wd013A A UNflvd!dln UNIT 3 TITLE ORDER NUMBER: 0158650 ZOOZ j 33U UNIT: Patty Se.e_y -0' Br'i en Senior 4:1 3 4 iatiliqg Heidi Foote, Ass-istant__Titte Officer TO: EVERGREEN PACIFIC SERVICES 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S. #255 TUKWILA, WA 98168 -0000 Attention : DARRELL NASH Your Number Reference Name: ROBB, ERIC HENKE, IRMA TITLE ORDER NUMBER: 0158650 Commitment Effective Date: March 7, 1997 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be'Issued: - ALTA Owners Policy - 1992 Form Standard Coverage General Schedule Rate Proposed Insured: ERIC ROBB, a single person - ALTA Loan Policy - 1992 Form Extended Coverage Simultaneous Rate Proposed Insured: APPROPRIATE LENDER - Easement Charge 2. The estate Commitment A.L.T.A, COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A TO:425 251 8782 Cory Dennis, Title Assistant Amount : $ 135,000.00 Premium : $ 640.00 Sales Tax: $ 52.48 Amount : $ 128,250.00 Premium : $ 285.00 Sales Tax: $ 23.37 Premium : $ 50.00 Sales Tax: $ 4.10 P.002 or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this i s a fee simple estate, as to Parcel A and an easement estate, as to Parcel B. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: A. F. HENKE and IRMA H. HENKE, his wife 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and is described as follows: See Attached DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 TO:425 251 8782 P.003 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment. Page 2 Order No. 0158650 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: u That portion of W.N. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, Section 23, Township 23— North, Range -4 —East, W.M., in King — Bounty, Washrington d as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract 28, OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, according to plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89 °47' East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet; THENCE South 24 °25' East 65 feet; THENCE South 68 °00' West 155.16 feet; THENCE North 22 °00' West 127.54 feet to the South line of Tract 27 of said Plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle; THENCE South 89 °47' East along said South line 143.55 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. PARCEL B: An easement for roadway and utilities 40 feet wide, being 20 feet in width on each side of the following described center line; Beginning at a point on the South line of Tract 28 OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, according to Plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington, which is South 89 °47'00" East 44.00 feet from the Southwest corner of said Tract 28; THENCE South 24'25'00" East to an intersection with the Northerly margin of the Renton -Three Tree Point Road. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. a= a. �Vi�. i�> �y'.'.:!` 7`:>#. tiirl`` Ct. il�bi'.1:+',;%x•_'r;WF+.` «;a: '.S,J'.ii:dt`. "vi:. Z° `" Y4srisdiv ;� ".:....;w''"`1:...�ztnZ v:44% DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 —• Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 3 Order No. 0158650 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued): NOTE FORLLNEORMAT ONAL_RURPOSE -S ONLY' The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. SE SE S23 TWP23 R4 TO:425 251 8782 P.004 4' 1 4%+:0.'X 4.4:4i,Adai. k 4.4.,kk: ' z - z J U oo u) 1.1.1: - I-- 'W O. 2 g J. D 0 : al I- z 1-• 1- 0 z F- U � :0 E- -. W W; x .. Z 0~ • Z DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 LJ Fidelity National Title Company of Washington - ALTA Commitment. Page 4 —• Order No, 0158650 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be p-nnperly— executed, de-1 iver-ed— and — duly — filed — for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public record. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the .land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts, in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materials theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. "Reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitude." SCHEDULE B TO:425 251 8782 P.005 DEC - 23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 F' del i cy i';.t ; onal Ti :l e Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 5 Order No. 0158650 C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property if unpaid. The subject property is located in the City of Tukwila. The excise tax rate is 1.53% as of January 1, 1992. 2. GENERAL TAXES PAYABLE AFTER FEBRUARY 15TH: THE FIRST HALF TAXES — ARE - DUE - PRIOR TO MAY 1ST; THE SECOND HALF TAXES ARE DUE PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1ST: Year: 1997 Amount Billed: $1,542.70 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $1,542.70 Tax Account No.: 000320- 0018 -03 The above amount is a TOTAL of the following charges; General Taxes: $1,542.70 Levy Code: 2380 Value of Land: $34,200.00 Value of Improvements: $67,100.00 3. To provide an Extended Coverage Lenders Policy, General Exceptions 1, 5 and 7 are hereby deleted. General Exceptions 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 will be considered when our Inspection and /or Survey, if required, is completed. A Supplemental Report will follow. We will inform you later whether the 100 Endorsement will issue with the forthcoming lenders policy. The Owner's Policy will be in Standard form only, unless otherwise requested and approved. 4. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD ": If the subject property, is or will be the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be held as a separate or community interest, execution of the proposed conveyance, contract to convey, or encumbrance must be by both husband and wife by reason of RCW 6.13 which provides for "automatic homestead ". EXECUTION UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL NOT PROVE ACCEPTABLE UNLESS FIRST APPROVED BY THIS COMPANY. 5. The legal description shown in Schedule A was determined from the property address provided at the time of application. The description should be examined and approved by all the parties to this transaction prior to closing. 6. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: May 13, 1905 Recording No.: 337820 Purpose: Water pipes Affects: E 18 (Underterminable) vp • TO:425 251 8782 �•rnr M+..m+.4��+r..; ••n•mor v ."°' P.006 DEC -23 -2002 13:14 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA Commitment, Page 6 Order No. 0158650 7. EASEMENT. AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT: z Recorded: April 3, 1909 _ ~. Recording No.: 605842 ' w Purpose: Iron water pipe U Affects: E 18 00 8. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: cow ° ecorded: August w = J R ecording No.: 1901223 co u_ In Favor Of: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company w 0 Purpose: Poles 2 Affects: E 18 g a 9. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: N = = Recorded: August 14, 1957 w Recording No.: 4824256 Z In Favor Of: Washington Natural Gas Company z o Purpose: pipeline or lines W u.i In Affects: Portion of Parcel A D o O 10. SIDE SEWER EASEMENT ANDCONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: o N t Recorded: March 2, 1965 Ili w Recording No.: 5849828 I-- Width: 6 feet 1 2:0 Affects: An undisclosed portion of said premises along the line ... as constructed r) _ . Said easement contains a provision for bearing a proportionate or equal cost of z maintenance, repair or reconstruction of said sewer by the common users. 11. ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: October 11, 1993 Recording No.: 9310110145 NOTE 1: Examination of the records discloses no judgments or other matters pending against the name(s) of Eric Robb, a single person, the proposed insured. NOTE 2: The address of the property is: 6542 South 154th Street Tukwila, Washington 98188 END OF SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS END OF NOTES TO:425 251 8782 P.007 U DEC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Fidelity National Title Company of Washin5tcn ALTA Commitment, Page 7 - &der No. 0158650 3/17/97 DC /kc cc: Gregory 0. Debay, Atty IS Ave—S. #9 Tukwila, Wa 98188 TO:425 251 8782 In the event this transaction fails to close and this Commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed Schedule of this Company. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER IF WE MAY BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE, PLEASE GIVE US A CALL P.008 z Z w 0 CO =: -J •W 0. ¢'. 2 z �. I- 0. Z I- al 0 0 - W W I I LL. F" • — 0' W z: 1= _ 0 • `z CDEC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM: WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Ficieljty N. atio gat Tito Cornpar r o ! .r•y 1� • y9 G t. I1;. oN 1 00 I. .r • \ r ' 7 d• (1 6k- v° � R sOVT�C 5• - - ;.106 noo4T 'zD .Ir ( IA Rtl, aR� I.7e• !I t irks ,ot Ry y.�AK Y �tl SR 405 N F�wER IN TO 425 251 8782 ORDER IN . '3rQal) tt �� \\ \ • • 7. 0 ..0 / 33 - -\ ashingtof SECTION 2 3 TOWNSHIP Z. ' RANGES P.009 ro a This sketch is provided as a courtesy only -by Fidelity National Title Company of Washington, without charge, for your Information. hit not intended to ba a Plat of Sutvey to show all matters relating to the property (including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or Iocatoin of boundaries). It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the Title Commitment or Policy to which it to attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for the correctness amity matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further Information. 1. . ray rswr+• •*xe^ear..�a.•mva- .+y�wM.+1urme er*n•.smi.,.�+w.,r�nrrtm,, r^ *P1.93eetli " .. . DiC -23 -2002 13:15 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 GBMRATE Pirct [anion Home Equity 3900 Pacific Highway East, #300 Tacoma, Washington 98424 Attention: Jodi Customer Ref.: 2251003505 PACIFIC NORTEWHST TITLE COMPANY OP WASHINGTON, INC. 12o1 Third Avenuo, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101 KELLY CORNWALL, Senior Title ()facer MARIE A. PIERCE, Title Officer Unit No. 6 FAX Number 206- 343 -8401 Tolephoue Number 206 -343 -1335 A. L. T. A. COIIHIT? ENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: March 17, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to he issued: ALTA Loan Policy Amount •$30,000.01 to $70,000.00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Premium $ 90.00 Tax (8.6t) $ 7.74 NOTE: TER FORTHCOMING LENDERS POLICY WILL REFLECT THE SPECIFIC LIABILITY CONTAINED ON THE INSURED DEED OF TRUST. Proposed Insured: FIRST ONION HOME EQUITY BANK, its successors and assigns 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein ie at Date of Commitment vested in: WILLIAM ERIC ROBB, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse, if married on or between July 21, 1998, and March 8, 1999 • • (NOTE: SEE SPECIAL EXCEPTION NUMBER 5 REGARDING EXECUTION OF THE FORTHCOMING DOCOM NT(8) TO BE INSURED). . 1. The land referred to in this commitment ia' situated in the County of Ring, State of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. TO 425 251 8782 P.010 Title Order No.: 376647 • DEC -23 -2002 1}:15 FROM: WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 TO:425 251 8782 V U 1:1061 Nat gnat Tide Company of Washington ORDER NUMBER ; SECTION TOWNSHIP Z3 R,kNGE - { ^, 1( C tt. -. r1O, • ) ♦� Z o0 .tea. -1141 • C7 C • . r ■• i. • Wi -' t•� •ot RI rnb dt!'t ) NNt.a R'g ■t` `� , "�, 6 to p vos, hF�1r 1liV�g t.o This sketch is provided as a courtesy only by Fidelity National Title Company of' Washington, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to be a Plat of Survey to show all matters rcIatinr to the property (including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or locatoin of boundaries). It is note part of, nor does it modify. the Title Commitment or Policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NC) LIABILITY for the correctness of any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. •1) (r(° Qi� fi Q 1 v. • `v /'. J • d o o yh / , P.011 o t3 ,./- r < G‘ci �— y 0 00 • DEC -23 -2002 13:16 FROM:WASHINGTON'HOME LOAN 2062433483 From : GPJG PHONE No. : .296 83B 9457 olvra.A / i''Chrti (cde.4. tIar>- L,44.. \/ n t% . . /� r ✓ �- Z1 yo! (In.( � non j 5)-1-roa o tv4.4- .cry # ar. as:mu 4 'O1 ti 4. CIA. 1 .41.4, rk.es rrjk Ate ,;.e' a1/0711A ( S 0( • WrA.A.1:0..,,y jo ...tht.PJ 101 1'14 f • :ji:Yt P r ~u.rv►r rlr.t :4 i �,. < <• T0.25 251 8782 4:1 *dr P.012 Mar.1l 1497 3:29PM P92 " 1041 ..nor e •,�ria ��?� 0 'fie * cs • t*Nst DEC -23 -2682 13:16 FROM: WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2662433483 flT!7 twIgnpmn7 0 Portion M.H. Gilliam Dt.0 No. 40, 23 -23 -04 TO:425 251 8782 P.613 Order No. 376647 A.L.T.A. COMMTMEN'r SCHEDULE A Page 2 Tha land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of Xing, state of Washington, and described an follows: That portion of the William U. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 Sant. W.M.. in Ring County, Washington. described as follows: Eummencing - tam t.he 8outhweet corner oL Tract I9 of the Plat Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Wanhington; thence mouth 89 °47' sash along the south line of said Tract 28, 66 reel to the true point of beginning; thence south 24°25 eant, 152 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly margin of Secondary State Highway No. 1 - L; thence northeasterly along said road margin 178 feet, more or le n5 Co its intert;eetion with tho south line of;said Tract 28; thence north 89 meet along aaid line to`•the true point of beginning. END OF SCI EDULE A NOTE POR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used an an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a eubatitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. 7 .41T rte. rr. I DEC -23 -2002 13:16 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 01/R tO 1 Tgng7MPR7. . �J TO:425 251 8782 PACIFIC NORTAWRST TITLE COMPANY OP WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A. CON=TMENT Schedule B.. Order No. 376647 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A_ Instruments neceaeary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed far. record. A. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule s of the Policy or Policies to be issued (an set forth in Schedule- A) -will- contain - exception — s to the fallowing matters =leas the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company; A. Defects, l,ienn°, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in posseagion, not shown by the public records„ a. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. . 1. Rncroaebmentc, ovcrLapa, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premised. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen'n compensation Act not shown by the public record's. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persona, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor linen as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (e) water rights, clai n or title to water... 7_ Any service, ; instal1ation, ,connec4.lon, maintenance. capacity, or constructi`an'pharges for newer, watefy electricity or garbage removal. S. General taxes hot now payable or matters relating to special assessments and upecial levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable Servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: An on Schedule E, attached. . 11 A►fl P.014 7,.['T £ up-DT-Cs t ^ti T t tilt tit It'll: I. ,n ..env i rero- •v9.PY �:9•[vsy�ys� —.. �fiM, �eu: n,^. r••» n s. rw... r.. nw.« e qr. wnwm«.... n-. .+ newnf.rx+v»w.,• DEC -23 -2002 13:17 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 • Z SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS; ; = Z W c4 NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: 6 = U U EFFECTIVE JAI,NUARY L; 1997, AND PURSUANT TO .AMENDMENT OF WASH/MOWN co C STATE STATU,CES ' RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF: RECORDED DOCOMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET FAILURE - - -. - H TO- COMPLY - MAY - RESULT - IN - REJECTION OF TUE DOCUMENT BY T[U' RECORDER. N u - W 0 2 FORMAT: Q co MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 1" ON SIDES AND BOTTOM - 1" = W ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OP EACH SUCCEEDING PAGE. RETURN ADDRESS IS Z �. Ol+jLY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. Z O FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER SIZE OP NO MORE THAN W W 8 1/2" BY 14". U � NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. W W So LL INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR OM THE FIRST PAGE Z N RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH MAY APPEAR !ITBIN TIlE•,.•OmR LEFT HAND 3" U = MARGIN, O 1-- Z (!TM O' ! TOW rn? TITLE OR TITLES OF DOCUMENT. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCE, REFERENCE TO RECORDING NUMBER OP sUE TECT DEED OF TRUST. NAMES OF GRANTOR (S) AND GRANTER (S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGER, IP ANY. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT. BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLATTED). ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL. NUMBER (S) . s n !Tin A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT =MULE B Page 2 (COdtinued) asp t�`�w2c��•�t''�ix $ PT MT I PI f+ nr .- . TO:425 251 8782 P.015 Order N4. 376647 • DE - 23-2002 13:17 FROM:WASHINGTON. LOAN 2062433483 (1T/f' :N.' 1' flfl7f•r+P7 • GENERAL. TAXES: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: AMOUNT DUE: t n • 'Wm A.L.T.A. COMMX'1MENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 $3,062.11 • $ 0.00 $3,063.11 (continued) Tn =425 251 8782 C) Z 3PSCSPECIAL LXCT�TIONS �cdntinuedJ; 1- Z W � 1. Agreements, Conditions, Covenants, Easements, Reservations, 6D Restrictions, Matters pertaining to boundary issues, and Servitudes - 10 O Of any nature whatsoever affecting said lands including, but not co 0 limited to, those which appear in the public records. H .— DELINQUENT - (iENERALi AND - S C1AL TAXES AND CHARGES: u) 0 W YEAR: 1998 2 � TAX ACCOUNT NUT'1B R: 000320- 0D19-02 - u. J T j ,RVY CODE: 2380 CO a I W ' DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: H = Z H AMOUNT BILLED: $1,134.26 AMOUNT PAID: $ 0.00 W W ' AMOUNT DUE: $1,1.?!�. 26 �0 PLUS INTIVEST 0 N • 0 '- 3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: PUNT HALF DELINQUENT MAY 2. W W IF UNPAID: SECOND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1, IP UNPAID: F = .. YEAR: 2999 O W Z TAX ACCOUNT NU 000320-0019702 fn LEVY CODE: 2300 U = CURR.BNT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $ 30, 000.00 Improvements: $160,000.00 4. DEED OP TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THERROP: GRANTOR: William E. Robb, a single person TRUSTEE: T.A. Service Company, Washington EENEFTCIARY: Western Sunriee aka Crossland Mortgage Corp., • Order No. 376647 P.016 UtC -23 -2002 13:17 FROM:WASHINGTON HOME LOAN 2062433483 Nancy Naeh NN /ed/8939P 0 AMOUNT: $154,000.00 DATED: January 23, 1999 RECORDED: January 29. 1999 RECORDING NOMUER: 99032913.69 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the mama can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from (.0u_ 5. QUESTION OP THE EXISTENCE Or AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD ": u 0 If the subject property is, or will be the ° residence of a marital g - u. community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be n the separate property of either spouse, execution of the proposed = C3 encumbrance, conveyance or contract to convey must be by both _ husband and wife. pursuant to R.C.R. 6.3.3, which provides for an Z F.. "automatic homestead ", and R.C.W. 26.16.030. Z O ui 6, rtatLara which may be disclosed by a search of the record= against D D p the name of the spouse of William Eric Robb, if married on or 0 N between JUly 21, 1998, and March 8, 1999. p E. w w NOTE 1: The records of King County and /or our inspection indicate that = F- r: ti 0 ..:Z w U= O H the address of the improvement located on said land is: 6550 South 154th Tukwila, Washington 98188. NOTE 2: Upon notification of Cancellation, there will be a minimum cancellation Yee of $50.00 pluo tax of'$4,.30. IMO A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT scU Tg,LE 8 Page 4 END 0? SCHEDULE H Title to this property wan examined by: TO:425 251 8782 P.017 Order No. 376647 Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set Yorth in Schedule A. t: ;. ;'•4:i�+ "xe•'' • ; r' iY.:Y' t�1w' k ,�t° s; 3,; ' Z z . 6 JU 00 uJ Z PREPARED FOR: OLD REPUBLK DEr3l?O2 � ECEn; � v TITLE & ESCROW;;;r. Today's Date 12/31/2002 Prepared By: Kathleen Goncalves PLEASE SPECIFY OLD REPUBLIC TITLE & ESCROW ON YOUR NEXT TRANSACTION 4114 198th Street SW, Suite #4 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Phone: (425) 766 -7750 Fax: (425) 776 -5950 Search Parameters: Parcel Number...25 000320 0017 000320 0018 000320 0019 000320 0004 000320 0011 000320 0010 000320 0014 000320 0015 000320 0023 000320 0022 000320 0025 000320 0007 359700 0320 359700 0321 359700 0500 359700 0520 022300 0010 thru 022300 0062 * Old Republic Title & Escrow Parcel No. Owner Co Owner Site Addr Mail Addr Sale Date Sale Price Loan Amt Land Use Zoning Bldg Name Plat Legal Bedrooms Bath Full Bath 3/4 • Bath 1/2 Other Rms : Dining Rm . Fireplace Stories Deck Deck Sq Ft : Porch Pool Units • Nuisance :Multiple St Access St Surface Wtr Front WtrFntLoc WtrFrntFT Golf Adj OWNER(S) :000320 0017 Bldg ID #: :State Of Washington : *No Site Address* Tukwila :Sc94 -2- 13577 -5 :07/08/1993 Doc# LAND INFORMATION :Public :Paved :No Deed Lender :300 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL :0 :Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 :GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 WLY 44 FT OF :FOLG BEG ON S LN OF TR 28 OF :INTERURBAN ADD 22 FT E OF SW COR Lot Sq Ft :6,886 Lot Acres :.16 Lot Shape . Tde/Upind : Topography : Topo Probd : DATE :1651 :Warranty PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 1st Floor SF 2nd Floor SF 3+ Floor SF . Above Gmd SF : Bsmnt Finished . Bsmnt Total SF : Building SqFt . Basement Type : Basement Grade : Bsmt Parking SF : Garage Type . Attached Grg SF : Detached Grg SF : Carport SqFt . DOC # View Lake/River Lake Sammamish: Lake Washington: Puget Sound . Seattle Skyline . TRANSFER HISTORY Total A.V. :$10,000 Land :$10,000 Struct % Imprvd . Levy Code :2380 2002 Tax . Excise Tax # :1318204 Q: SE S:23 T:23N R:04E Map Grid :655 G4 Nbrhd Code :051004 Phone # . Census Tract: Block: Vol :905 Pg:16 Year Built Eff Year Bldg Matl Bldg Cond Bldg Grade Interior Wall Matl Insulation Heat Source Heat Type Air Method Electric Svc Wtr Source Sewer Type VIEW INFORMATION :None PRICE DEED • • • :Water District Mountain Mt. Rainier . Olympics Cascades Territorial . Other LOAN TYPE REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS 800 - 345 -7334 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Old Republic Title & Escrow * 4 * Parcel No. :000320 0018 Bldg ID #:1 Owner :Robb William Eric Co Owner Site Addr :6542 S 154Th St Tukwila 98188 Mail Addr :6542 S 154Th St Tukwila Wa 98188 Sale Date :04/08/1997 Doc# :1554 Sale Price :$135,000 FULL Deed :Warranty Loan Amt :$128,000 Lender :Standard Federal Bank Land Use :002 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Zoning :0 Bldg Name : Plat :Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Legal :GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 BEG SW COR TR :28 OF INTERURBAN ADD TH S 89 -47 -00 :EALGSLNOFSDTR22FTTHS Bedrooms :3 Bath Full :1 Bath 3/4 Bath 1/2 Other Rms : Dining Rm . Fireplace :2 Stories :1 Deck :Yes Deck Sq Ft :160 Porch :Yes Pool Units :1 Nuisance :Multiple St Access St Surface Wtr Front WtrFntLoc WtrFmtFT Golf Adj OWNER(S) :Robb William Eric LAND INFORMATION :Private :Paved :No PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 1st Floor SF :1,090 2nd Floor SF 3+ Floor SF . Above Grnd SF :1,090 Bsmnt Finished :310 Bsmnt Total SF :1,090 Building SqFt :2,180 Basement Type :Daylt Basement Grade :Fair Bsmt Parking SF :520 Garage Type :Basement Attached Grg SF : Detached Grg SF : Carport SqFt . Lot Sq Ft :14,874 Lot Acres :.34 Lot Shape . Tde/Upind : Topography : Topo Probd : DATE :04/08/1997 View Lake/River Lake Sammamish: Lake Washington: Puget Sound . Seattle Skyline . TRANSFER HISTORY Total A.V. :$192,000 Land :$46,000 Struct :$146,000 % Imprvd :76 Levy Code :2380 2002 Tax :$2,582.13 Excise Tax # :1537112 Q: SE S:23 T:23N R:04E Map Grid :655 G4 Nbrhd Code :051004 Phone # . Census Tract : Block: Vol :905 Pg:16 Year Built Eff Year Bldg Matl Bldg Cond Bldg Grade Interior Wall Matl Insulation Heat Source Heat Type Air Method Electric Svc Wtr Source Sewer Type :1957 :Avg :Avg :Gas :Hot Water :Water District :Public VIEW INFORMATION :None Mountain Mt. Rainier . Olympics Cascades Territorial . Other DOC # PRICE DEED LOAN TYPE 1554 :$135,000 :Warranty :$128,000 :Convent REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS 800 - 345 -7334 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. * � * * + r Old Republic Title & Escrow Parcel No. :000320 0019 Bldg ID #:1 Owner :Bums Ricky K/Rena E Co Owner Site Addr :6550 S 154Th St Tukwila 98188 Mail Addr :23812 102Nd Ave SE Kent Wa 98031 Sale Date :11/19/2001 Doc# :2692 Sale Price • Deed :Quit Claim Loan Amt . Lender Land Use :002 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Zoning :Ldr Bldg Name : Plat :Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Legal :GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 BEG SW COR OF :TRACT 28 OF INTERURBAN ADD BEING :IN NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC Bedrooms :4 Bath Full :1 Bath 3/4 :1 Bath 1/2 :1 Other Rms : Dining Rm . 'Fireplace :2 Stories :1 Deck :Yes Deck Sq Ft :350 Porch :Yes Pool • Units :1 Nuisance :Multiple St Access :Public St Surface :Paved Wtr Front WtrFntLoc : WtrFrntFT : Golf Adj :No OWNER(S) :Burns Ricky K/Rena E :Robb Eric LAND INFORMATION 1st Floor SF :1,680 2nd Floor SF 3+ Floor SF . Above Grnd SF :1,680 Bsmnt Finished :1,680 Bsmnt Total SF :1,680 Building SqFt :3,360 Basement Type :Daylt Basement Grade :Low\Avg Bsmt Parking SF : Garage Type . Attached Grg SF : Detached Grg SF : Carport SqFt . Lot Sq Ft :10,373 Lot Acres :.24 Lot Shape . Tde/Upind : Topography : Topo Probd : PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS View :Yes Lake/River • Lake Sammamish: Lake Washington: Puget Sound . Seattle Skyline . TRANSFER HISTORY DATE DOC # PRICE :11/19/2001 2692 Total A.V. :$258,000 Land :$30,000 Struct :$228,000 % Imprvd :88 Levy Code :2380 2002 Tax :$3,469.23 Excise Tax # :1852836 Q: SE S:23 T:23N R:04E Map Grid :655 G4 Nbrhd Code :051004 Phone # . Census Tract : Block: Vol :905 Pg:16 Year Built Eff Year Bldg Matl Bldg Cond Bldg Grade Interior Wall Matl Insulation Heat Source Heat Type Air Method Electric Svc Wtr Source Sewer Type :1961 :Good :Avg :Gas :Hot Water :Water District :Public VIEW INFORMATION Mountain Mt. Rainier :Good Olympics Cascades Territorial :Good Other DEED LOAN TYPE :Quit Claim . :Re Contract : REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS 800 - 345 -7334 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp Land Use Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal : 000320 0004 09 Platted : Housing Authority Of King C : 15455 65Th Ave S Tukwila 98188 : 15455 65Th Ave S Tukwila Wa 98188 Aud # : Deed Loan :O Lender : IntTyp : : 106 Off,Office Building : King County Housing Authoritye : No : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 : BLK POR LOT POR GILLIAM W H -DC # Bldgld :1 Struct : $564,300 Land : $311,000 Total : $875,300 Imprvd . LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : ExemptCd . Ex Tax# . Phone . • 90Census : 262.00 4 Map Grid : 655 H5 Nbrhd Cd : 070010 Q : SE S:23 T : 23N R : 04E Volume : 905 Page : 16 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units IstF1rSF . / / 2ndFlr SF . 3 +FIoorSF : . Ha JF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : :1 BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 11,473 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 1.02 Lot SF : 44,435 WtrFront . DesignType : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF : 1974 : 1974 : Masonry : Avg Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse : 309 Vacant,Commercial Bldg Num : Vacant Land Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 POR OF D C LY : 000320 0007 06 Platted : Nelsen James R & Loren S Frohmuth : 610 Tukwila Pky Tukwila : 16113 W Valley Hwy Tukwila Wa 98188 : 09/21/2000 Aud # : 1437 Deed : Executors Loan : TUC Lender : IntTyp : Bldgld : Struct Land : $53,900 Total : $53,900 Imprvd . LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $726.05 ExemptCd . Ex Tax # . Phone : 425-255-6535 90Census . • Map Grid : 655 H4 Nbrhd Cd : 070020 Q : SW S:24 T : 23N R : 04E Volume : 905 Page : 16 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms . • Bath F3H . • Fireplace . • Bsmt Type . Deck Stories Units IstFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : HalfF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF Bldg SF AttGrgSF LotAcres Lot SF WtrFront DesignType • • • : 1.46 : 63,687 YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF MetroScan / King (WA) Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan /King (WA) Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal : 000320 0010 01 Platted : Schneider Gerald E #15523 : 6510 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila 98188 : 7517 Greenwood Ave N Seattle Wa 98103 Aud # : Deed Loan Lender IntTyp :LDR : 106 Off,Office Building : 6510 Bldg Mobile Home : No Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 POR OF DC LY Bldgld :1 Q : SE Struct : $904,200 Land : $166,800 Total : $1,071,000 hnprvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $14,396.69 ExemptCd Ex Tax# Phone : 206-440-5662 90Census : 262.00 4 Map Grid : 655 H5 Nbrhd Cd : 070010 S : 23 T : 23N Volume : 905 Page : 16 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units 1 stFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF . 3+FloorSF : Ha fF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : 2 BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 12,267 AttGrgSF . LotAcres :.51 Lot SF : 22,244 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt : 1978 Eff Year : 1990 BldgMatl : Wood Frame BldgCond BldgGrde : Avg WtrFrtSF Parcel# Owner Co Owner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse . Bldg Num . S Plat REC # SubPlat . Legal 000320 0011 00 Platted Royal Coachman Associates 6450 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila 98188 8009 S 180Th St Kent Wa 98032 09/02/1988 $375,000 0 Aud # Deed Loan Lender IntTyp 106 Off,Office Building Royal Coachman Assoc,ile Home : No Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 POR OF DC LY Bldgld :1 : 730 MULTI - PARCEL : Warranty Q : SE Struct : $1,085,800 Land : $384,200 Total : $1,470,000 hnprvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $19,759.57 ExemptCd Ex Tax# • Phone • 90Census : 262.00 4 Map Grid : 655 H5 Nbrhd Cd : 070010 S : 23 T : 23N Volume : 905 Page : 16 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units 1 1 stFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : Ha JFb•SF : FinBsmtSF : BstntTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 15,000 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 1.18 Lot SF : 51,226 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt E, (Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF : 1989 : 1990 : Masonry : Avg Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. °.rtm_,.c "x r „ , xrm¢?vmpos see a e�rsul,... MetroScan /King (WA) Parcel# : 000320 0014 07 Platted Bldgld : Struct . Owner : Schneider Homes Inc Land : $81,500 CoOwner Total : $81,500 Site : *No Site Address* Tukwila % Imprvd . • Mail : 6510 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Wa 98188 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt Aud # : 2002 Tax : $1,097.01 Price Deed ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # . Zoning :O Lender Phone . • VestTyp httTyp : 90Census . • LandUse : 309 Vacant,Commercial Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Nun: : Vacant Land Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 070010 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N REC # Volume : 905 SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Page : 16 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 BEG SW COR TR Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms IstFlr SF . Bath F3H / / 2ndFlr SF . Fireplace 3 +FloorSF : Bsmt Type . HaJFb•F Deck FinBsmtSF : Stories BsmtTotSF : Units BsnttGrgSF : FinishSF YearBlt Bldg SF Eff Year AttGrgSF BldgMatl LotAcres : .62 BldgCond . Lot SF : 27,170 BldgGrde WtrFront WtrFrtSF Design Type : Parcel# : 000320 0015 06 Platted Bldgld :1 Owner : Klotz Kevin G Co Owner Site : 6532 S 154Th St Tukwila 98188 Mail : 6532 S 154Th St Tukwila Wa 98188 Sale Dt : 10/19/1993 Aud # : 958 Price : $111,000 Full Deed : Warranty LoanAmt : $111,240 Loan :Fha Zoning : 0 Lender : Mortgage Master Servi VestTyp : Sole And Separ httTyp : Fixed LandUse : 002 Res,Single Family Residence Bldg Num : Residence Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 BEG SW COR TR Q : SE : $121,000 : $38,000 : $159,000 Struct Land Total % Imprvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $2,138.59 ExemptCd Ex Tax# • Phone 90Census Map Grid : 655 G4 Nbrhd Cd : 051004 S : 23 T : 23N Volume : 905 Page : 16 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms : 3 IstFlr SF : 1,010 FinishSF : 1,010 YearBlt : 1955 Bath F3H :1 / / 2ndFlr SF : Bldg SF : 1,010 Eff Year . • Fireplace :1 3 +FloorSF : AttGrgSF BldgMatl . • Bsmt Type . HalfFlrSF : LotAcres : .47 BldgCond : Avg Deck FinBsmtSF : Lot SF : 20,500 BldgGrde : Avg Stories :1 BsmtTotSF : WtrFront WtrFrtSF . Units :1 BsnttGrgSF : Design Type : Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Parcel# : 000320 0017 04 Platted BldgId : Struct . Owner : State Of Washington Land : $10,000 CoOwner Total : $10,000 Site : *No Site Address* Tukwila % Imprvd . Mail : Sc94- 2- 13577 -5 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 07/08/1993 Aud # : 1651 2002 Tax . Price Deed : Warranty ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # Zoning :O Lender : Phone VestTyp IntTyp : 90Census . LandUse : 300 Vacant,Residential Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Num Mobile Home :No Nbrhd Cd : 051004 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 905 SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Page : 16 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 WLY 44 FT OF Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units l stFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF . 3 +F1oorSF : Ha JF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF . AttGrgSF . LotAcres : .16 Lot SF : 6,886 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF • • • • • • • • • • Parcel# : 000320 0018 03 Platted Bldgld :1 Struct : $146,000 Owner : Robb William Eric Land : $46,000 CoOwner Total : $192,000 Site : 6542 S 154Th St Tukwila 98188 % Iinprvd . Mail : 6542 S 154Th St Tukwila Wa 98188 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 04/08/1997 Acrd # : 1554 2002 Tax : $2,582.13 Price : $135,000 Full Deed : Warranty ExemptCd . LoanAmt : $128,000 Loan : Conventional Ex Tax # . Zoning : 0 Lender : Standard Federal Bank Phone . VestTyp : Single Person IntTyp : Adjustable 90Census . LandUse : 002 Res,Single Family Residence Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Num Mobile Home : No Nbrlcd Cd : 051004 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 905 SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Page : 16 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 BEG SW COR TR Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms : 1stFIrSF : 1,090 FinishSF : 1,400 YearBlt : 1957 Bath F3H :1 / / 2ndFlr SF : Bldg SF : 2,180 Eff Year . Fireplace : 3 +FloorSF : AttGrgSF BldgMatl . Bsmt Type : Daylt Ha fF1rSF : LotAcres : .34 BldgCond : Avg Deck : Yes FinBsmtSF : 310 Lot SF : 14,874 BldgGrde : Avg Stories :1 BsmtTotSF : 1,090 WtrFront : WUFrtSF . Units :1 BsmtGrgSF : 520 Design Type : 4 Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan /King (WA) m:. ; vn+ �r, �Ma .v:cr�nxn+++rwrrravrer;�+nwc. Parcel# : 000320 0019 02 Platted BldgId :1 Struct : $228,000 Owner : Burns Ricky K/Rena E Land : $30,000 CoOwner Total : $258,000 Site : 6550 S 154Th St Tukwila 98188 % Itnptvd . Mail : 23812 102Nd Ave SE Kent Wa 98031 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 11/19/2001 Aud # : 2692 2002 Tax : $3,469.23 Price Deed : Quit Claim ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # . Zoning : LDR Lender : Phone . • VestTyp : Married Persons IntTyp : 90Census . LandUse : 002 Res,Single Family Residence Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Num Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 051004 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 905 SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Page : 16 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 BEG SW COR OF Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms : Bath F3H : 1 / 1 / 1 Fireplace : Bsmt Type : Daylt Deck : Yes Stories :1 Units :1 1stFlr SF : 1,680 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : Ha1fF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : 1,680 BsmtTotSF : 1,680 BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF : 3,360 YearBlt : 1961 Bldg SF : 3,360 Eff Year AttGrgSF BldgMatl LotAcres : .24 BldgCond : Good Lot SF : 10,373 BldgGrde : Avg WtrFront WtrFrtSF Design Type : Parcel# : 000320 0022 07 Platted Bldgld : Struct Owner : City Of Tukwila Land : $44,900 CoOwner Total : $44,900 Site : 510 Tukwila Pkwy Tukwila 98188 % hnprvd . Mail : 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Wa 98188 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 12/08/1983 Aud # : 424 2002 Tax : Price Deed : Quit Claim ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # Zoning : TUC Lender : Phone VestTyp IntTyp : 90Census . LandUse : 309 Vacant,Commercial Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Num : Vacant Land Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 905 SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Page : 16 Legal : GILLIAM W H -D C # 40 POR OF DC Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms 1stFlr SF FinishSF YearBlt Bath F3H : / / 2ndFlr SF : Bldg SF Eff Year Fireplace 3 +F1oorSF : AttGrgSF BldgMatl Bsmt Type Ha fFIrSF : LotAcres : 1.03 BldgCond . Deck FinBsmtSF : Lot SF : 44,874 BldgGrde Stories BsmtTotSF : WtrFront WtrFrtSF Units BsmtGrgSF : Design Type : MetroScan /King (WA) Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / King (WA) Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal : 000320 0023 06 : City Of Tukwila Platted : 15450 65Th Ave S Tukwila 98188 : 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Wa 98188 Aud # Deed Loan :O Lender . IntTyp : : 309 Vacant,Commercial : Vacant Mobile Home : No : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 : BLK POR LOT POR GILLIAM W H DC # BldgId : Struct Land : $58,600 Total : $58,600 Imprvd • LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : ExemptCd Ex Tax # • Phone 90Census : 262.00 4 Map Grid : 655 H5 Nbrhd Cd : 070010 Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E Volume : 905 Page : 16 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units 1stFlrSF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3+FloorSF : Ha fFIrSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF . AttGrgSF . LotAcres : .18 Lot SF : 7,813 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond : BldgGrde WtrFrtSF Parcel# : 000320 0025 04 Platted Owner : City Of Tukwila CoOwner Site : 600 Tukwila Pky Tukwila Mail : 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Wa 98188 Sale Dt Aud # Price Deed LoanAmt Loan Zoning : TUC Lender VestTyp • IntTyp LandUse : 309 Vacant,Commercial Bldg Num : Vacant Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Donation Claim Gilliam # 40 Legal : LOT POR GILLIAM W H -D -C #40 POR OF BldgId : Q : SW Struct Land Total Imprvd LevyCode 2002 Tax ExemptCd Ex Tax # Phone 90Census Map Grid Nbrhd Cd S : 24 Volume Page Jurisdiction • : $1,500 : $1,500 : 2380 • : 655 H4 : 070020 T : 23N : 905 :16 : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units IstF1rSF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : Ha fFIrSF FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF Bldg SF . AttGrgSF . LotAcres : .09 Lot SF : 4,046 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond . BldgGrde WtrFrtSF Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / King (WA) Parcel# : 022300 0010 09 Platted Bldgld :1 Struct : $4,341,900 Owner : Beta Holdings Limited Partnership Land : $2,258,100 CoOwner Total : $6,600,000 Site : 301 Tukwila Pkwy Tukwila 98188 % hnprvd Mail : 18827 Bothell Way NE Bothell Wa 98011 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 04/30/1992 Aud # : 1682 2002 Tax : $88,711.05 Price Deed : Quit Claim ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # . Zoning : TUC Lender : Phone VestTyp : Partnership IttTyp : 90Census . • LandUse : 101 Com,Retail Store Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg NUM : The Annex Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N REC # Volume : 66 SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Page : 36 Legal LOT 1 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 1 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms IstFlrSF . Bath F3H . / / 2ndFlr SF . Fireplace 3+FloorSF : Bsmt Type . Ha fFIrSF . Deck FinBsmtSF : Stories :1 BsmtTotSF : Units BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF YearBlt : 1962 Bldg SF : 39,760 Eff Year : 1981 AttGrgSF BldgMatl : Masonry LotAcres : 3.24 BldgCond . Lot SF : 141,136 BldgGrde : Avg WtrFront WtrFrtSF Design Type : Parcel# : 022300 0010 09 Platted Bldgld :2 Struct : $4,341,900 Owner : Beta Holdings Limited Partnership Land : $2,258,100 CoOwner Total : $6,600,000 Site : 301 Tukwila Pkwy Tukwila 98188 % Imprvd . Mail : 18827 Bothell Way NE Bothell Wa 98011 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 04/30/1992 Aud # : 1682 2002 Tax : $88,711.05 Price Deed : Quit Claim ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # Zoning : TUC Lender : Phone VestTyp : Partnership IntTyp : 90Census . • LandUse : 101 Com,Retail Store Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Num : The Annex Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 66 SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Page : 36 Legal : LOT 1 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 1 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms lstFlr SF FinishSF YearBlt : 1986 Bath F3H : / / 2ndFlr SF : Bldg SF : 8,286 Eff Year : 1986 Fireplace 3 +FloorSF : AttGrgSF BldgMatl : Masonry Bsmt Type : Ha fFIrSF : LotAcres : 3.24 BldgCond . Deck FinBsmtSF : Lot SF : 141,136 BldgGrde : Avg Stories :1 BsmtTotSF : WtrFront WtrFrtSF . Units BsmtGrgSF : Design Type : ���w a�rikizl7wv�i4Ju'."•�'i.'�. Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan /King (WA) Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units : 022300 0020 07 Platted BldgId :1 : Mustang Llc : 100 Andover Park W Tukwila 98188 : PO Box 88162 Seattle Wa 98138 : 05/10/2000 Aud # : 594 MULTI- PARCEL : $5,147,500 Full Deed : Warranty Loan . : TUC Lender . : Corporation IntTyp : : 195 Ind,Warehouse : Fatigue Technology Inciile Home : No : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 : LOT 2 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 1 :1 lstFlrSF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3+FloorSF : Ha JFIrSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : Q: SE FinishSF . Bldg SF : 80,916 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 3.33 Lot SF : 145,200 WtrFront . DesignType : Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal : 022300 0030 05 Platted BldgId :1 : Eagle Hardware /Garden Inc : 401 Tukwila Pky Tukwila : 101 Andover Park E #200 Tukwila Wa 98188 Aud # : 951 : Warranty : 08/03/1992 : $13,125,000 Full Deed Loan : TUC Lender : Corporation IntTyp : 105 Com,Retail,Discount : Lowes Hardware Mobile Home : No Andover Industrial Park No. 01 LOT 3 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK #1 Q : SE Struct : $9,040,200 Land : $6,352,800 Total : $15,393,000 Imprvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $206,896.54 ExemptCd . Ex Tax # Phone 90Census Map Grid : 655 G4 Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S : 23 T : 23N Volume : 66 Page : 36 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units 1 IstFIrSF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3+FloorSF : Ha fF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 180,036 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 9.12 Lot SF : 397,053 WtrFront . DesignType : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF : 1961 : 1988 : Masonry . Good Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Struct : $2,041,700 Land : $2,323,200 Total : $4,364,900 % hnptvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $58,669.52 ExemptCd Ex Tax # Phone 90Census : 262.00 1 Map Grid : 655 G5 Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S : 23 T : 23N Volume : 66 Page : 36 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E YearBlt : 1963 Eff Year : 1985 BldgMatl : Masonry BldgCond : BldgGrde : Avg WtrFrtSF Parcel# : 022300 0040 03 Platted Owner : Equilon Enterprises Lie Co Owner Site : 501 Tukwila Pkwy Tukwila 98188 Mail : PO Box 4453 Houston Tx 77210 Sale Dt : 07/23/1998 Aud # Price Deed LoanAmt Loan Zoning : TUC Lender VestTyp In1Typ LandUse : 186 Pub,Service Station Bldg Num : Texaco Station Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Legal : LOT 4 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 1 : 1496 : Special Warranty B1dgId :1 Struct : $251,700 Land : $806,600 Total : $1,058,300 % Imprvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : $14,225.99 ExemptCd . Ex Tax # Phone : 360-493-2370 90Census • Map Grid : 655 G4 Nbrhd Cd : 070020 Q:SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E Volume : 66 Page : 36 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units 1stFIrSF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : Ha fF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : :1 BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 1,260 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 1.16 Lot SF : 50,415 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF : 1968 : 1980 : Pre -Engr Steel : Excellent Parcel# : 022300 0045 08 Platted Owner : Crim Investments Co Owner Site : 112 Andover Park E Tukwila 98188 Mail : PO Box 30182 Seattle Wa 98103 Sale Dt Aud # . Price Deed . LoanAmt Loan . Zoning : TUC Lender : VestTyp IntTyp : LandUse : 101 Com,Retail Store Bldg Num : Kinko's Copies Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Legal : LOT 4 -5 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # Bldgld :1 Struct : $1,312,800 Land : $792,500 Total : $2,105,300 % Imprvd . Levy Code : 2380 2002 Tax : $28,298.51 ExemptCd . Ex Tax # Phone 90Census : 262.00 1 Map Grid : 655 H5 Nbrhd Cd : 070020 Q:SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E Volume : 66 Page : 36 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories :1 Units IstFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3+FloorSF : Ha fF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 17,588 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 1.14 Lot SF : 49,535 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF : 1966 : 1989 : Wood Frame : Avg MetroScan /King (WA) Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan /King (WA) Parcel# : 022300 0050 00 Platted Bldgld : Struct Owner : Pitney Bowes Properties Inc Land : $356,300 CoOwner Total : $356,300 Site : 100 Andover Park W Tukwila 98188 % Imprvd . Mail : 1 Elmcroft Rd Stamford Ct 06926 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 01/10/1983 Aud # : 44 MULTI- PARCEL 2002 Tax : $4,790.55 Price : $606,000 Deed : Warranty ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # . • Zoning : TUC Lender Phone . • VestTyp IntTyp : 90Census : 262.00 1 LandUse : 106 Off,Office Building Map Grid : 655 G5 Bldg Num : Pitney Bowes Inc Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S Plat Q : SE S:23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 66 SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Page : 36 Legal : LOT 5 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 1 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms 1 stFlr SF . Bath F3H / / 2ndFlr SF . Fireplace 3 +FloorSF Bsmt Type : Ha1fFIrSF . Deck FinBsmtSF : Stories BsmtTotSF : Units BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF YearBlt Bldg SF Eff Year AttGrgSF BldgMatl LotAcres :.51 BldgCond Lot SF : 22,270 BldgGrde WtrFront WtrFrtSF Design Type : Parcel# : 022300 0060 08 Platted BldgId :1 Struct : $753,500 Owner : Pitney Bowes Properties Inc Land : $502,000 CoOwner Total : $1,255,500 Site : 116 Andover Park E Tukwila 98188 % Imprvd Mail : 1 Elmcroft Rd Stamford Ct 06926 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 01/10/1983 Aud # : 44 MULTI- PARCEL 2002 Tax : $16,876.51 Price : $606,000 Deed : Warranty ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # . Zoning :TUC Lender : Phone . • VestTyp IntTyp : 90Census : 262.00 1 LandUse : 106 Off,Office Building Map Grid : 655 H5 Bldg Num : Pitney Bowes Inc Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 070020 S Plat Q :SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 66 SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Page : 36 Legal : LOT 6 ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 1 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms . 1stFlrSF FinishSF YearBlt : 1972 Bath F3H / / 2ndFlr SF : Bldg SF : 23,550 Eff Year : 1990 Fireplace 3 +FloorSF : AttGrgSF BldgMatl : Reinf Conc Bsmt Type . Ha JFh•SF : LotAcres : .72 BldgCond Deck FinBsmtSF : Lot SF : 31,380 BldgGrde : Avg \Good Stories : BsmtTotSF : WtrFront WtrFrtSF Units BsmtGrgSF : Design Type : Infonnation compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Vmr, , s=VVW #4 1, .ern ra: rocc '- MetroScan /King (WA) Parcel# : 022300 0062 06 Platted B1dgId :1 Owner : Home Electric Company Co Owner Site : 120 Andover Park E Tukwila 98188 Mail : 2366 Eastlake Ave E #312 Seattle Wa 98102 Sale DI : 10/28/1991 Aud # : 1432 Price Deed : Re Contract LoanAmt Loan Zoning : TUC Lender : VestTyp IntTyp : LandUse : 101 Com,Retail Store Bldg Nunn : Retail Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Andover Industrial Park No. 01 Legal : LOT 6 & ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK # Q: SE Struct Land Total % Imprvd LevyCode 2002 Tax ExemptCd Ex Tax # Phone 90Census Map Grid Nbrhd Cd S : 23 Volume Page Jurisdiction : $1,100,400 : $818,600 : $1,919,000 : 2380 : $25,794.48 • : 262.00 1 : 655 H5 : 070020 T : 23N : 66 :36 : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories :1 Units I stFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FloorSF : Half IrSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF : 17,800 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 1.17 Lot SF : 51,164 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF : 1963 : 1985 : Masonry : Avg Parcel# Owner Co Owner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal : 359700 0320 06 Platted : City Of Tukwila : • 15447 65Th Ave S Tukwila 98188 : 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Wa 98188 : 12/14/1994 Aud# : 116 : $690,850 Full Deed • Loan : HDR Lender IntTyp : 309 Vacant,Commercial : Vacant CommercialMobile Home : No Bldgld : : Special Warranty : Interurban Add To Seattle : LOT 17 INTERURBAN ADD TO SEATTLE Q: SE Struct • Land : $690,900 Total : $690,900 % Imptvd LevyCode : 2380 2002 Tax : ExemptCd . Ex Tax # Phone 90Census : 262.00 4 Map Grid : 655 H5 Nbrhd Cd : 070010 S : 23 T : 23N Volume : 10 Page : 55 Jurisdiction : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units IstF1rSF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FloorSF : Ha fFIrSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF . Bldg SF . AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 3.17 Lot SF : 138,170 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond : BldgGrde WtrFrtSF Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Parcel# : 359700 0321 05 Platted Owner : Shozen Julia N CoOwner Site : 15415 65Th Ave S Tukwila 98188 Mail : 15415 65Th Ave S Tukwila Wa 98188 Sale Dt Aud # . Price Deed . LoanAmt Loan . Zoning :O Lender : VestTyp IntTyp : LandUse : 002 Res,Single Family Residence Bldg Num Mobile Home : No S Plat REC # SubPlat : Interurban Add To Seattle Legal : LOT 17 INTERURBAN ADD TO SEATTLE Bldgld :1 Struct Land Total hnprvd Levy Code 2002 Tax ExemptCd Ex Tax # Phone 90Census Map Grid Nbrhd Cd Q : SE S : 23 Volume Page Jurisdiction : $139,000 : $66,000 : $205,000 : 2380 : $2,756.95 : 206 - 632 -3239 : 262.00 4 : 655 H5 : 051004 T: 23N : 10 : 55 : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units :4 :1 / :1 :1 IstFIrSF : 1,120 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : Ha fFIrSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF : 1,120 Bldg SF : 1,120 AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 1.10 Lot SF : 48,069 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt : 1953 Eff Year • BldgMatl • BldgCond : Avg BldgGrde : Avg WtrFrISF Parcel# Owner CoOwner Site Mail Sale Dt Price LoanAmt Zoning VestTyp LandUse Bldg Num S Plat REC # SubPlat Legal : 359700 0500 08 Platted : City Of Tukwila : *No Site Address* Tukwila : 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Wa 98188 Aud # : Deed . Loan . :O Lender : IntTyp : : 300 Vacant,Residential Mobile Home : No : Interurban Add To Seattle : LOT 27 INTERURBAN ADD TO SEATTLE Bldgld Struct Land Total Inzprvd Levy Code 2002 Tax ExemptCd Ex Tax # Phone 90Census Map Grid Nbrhd Cd Q:SE S:23 Volume Page Jurisdiction : $47,000 : $330,000 : $377,000 : 2380 : 655 G4 : 051004 T : 23N : 10 : 55 : TUKWILA R : 04E Bedrooms Bath F3H Fireplace Bsmt Type Deck Stories Units I stFlr SF . / / 2ndFlr SF : 3 +FIoorSF : HalfF1rSF : FinBsmtSF : BsmtTotSF : BsmtGrgSF : FinishSF Bldg SF . AttGrgSF . LotAcres : 6.37 Lot SF : 277,693 WtrFront . Design Type : YearBlt Eff Year BldgMatl BldgCond BldgGrde WtrFrtSF MetroScan /King (WA) Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. MetroScan / King (WA) Parcel# : 359700 0520 04 Platted Bldgld : Struct . • Owner : Alhadeff Michael D Land : $148,900 CoOwner Total : $148,900 Site : 6600 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila % Imprvd . Mail : 6305 Beach Dr SW Seattle Wa 98136 LevyCode : 2380 Sale Dt : 04/23/1982 Aud # : 147 2002 Tax : $2,003.28 Price : $225,000 Deed : Warranty ExemptCd . LoanAmt Loan Ex Tax # . • Zoning : RCM Lender : Phone . • VestTyp IntTyp : 90Census . • LandUse : 300 Vacant,Residential Map Grid : 655 G4 Bldg Num : Vacant Mobile Home : No Nbrhd Cd : 051004 S Plat Q : SE S : 23 T : 23N R : 04E REC # Volume : 10 SubPlat : Interurban Add To Seattle Page : 55 Legal : LOT 28 INTERURBAN ADD TO SEATTLE Jurisdiction : TUKWILA Bedrooms 1stFlrSF FinishSF YearBlt Bath F3H 1 1 2ndFl• SF . Bldg SF Eff Year Fireplace 3+FloorSF : AttGrgSF BldgMatl Bsmt Type : HalfFlrSF : LotAcres : 4.56 BldgCond Deck FinBsmtSF : Lot SF : 198,585 BldgGrde Stories BsmtTotSF : WtrFront WtrFrtSF Units BsmlGrgSF : Design Type : Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me t ' ' ` OT t0•• 2 :o N_ARr m: / i i / PUBLIC • i If �'•9 . � AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplan ®ci.tukwila.wa.us PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY 6S The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers contractors or other r r sentatives the right t ent� u on Owner's real property, located at 6700 and 642 South 154tt Stre Tukwi1�, WA for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. /� n EXECUTED at 1 M k (Al I t - (city), WA (state), on /W ! 50/�/0e2-- ,E/2/ e / O /313 (Print Name) n � 6 s _ S I p r ' Vgrau.r�a, (Address) (Phone Numbe (Signature) F- -eAC, 1'ob? My Commission expires on 0 6 '4-`-(3 — S 2-6 NOTARY t � � : LIC u} and fo a State of Washington /�t residing .1./?1 ,SUM 1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. n,.,, r 1 __ �, [�x.A ' ' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 30 DAY OF � 4e , DOcD RECEIVED DEC 3 1 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . 14114 Ms. Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment Application 6550 and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, Washington King County Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Our Job No. 10751 Dear Ms. Fox: I, iSeJPivieleR (adjacent land ownel') , res at County Parcel No /v This letter is intended to serve as evidence of my agreement with Mr. Eric Robb, conditioned on approval of rezone of his property, to cooperate in providing reciprocal access easements to resolve an access issue relating to the egress from the properties located at 6550 & 6542 Southcenter Blvd. We plan to connect this existing access point from Mr. Robb's property through my property to provide safe egress from both of our developments. This letter of intent is granted with the understanding that the exact configuration and improvements necessary to construct these access ways has yet to be determined. I certify that I am the owner of the property referenced above and that I am authorized by any and all other owners of this property to provide this letter of intent. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Sincerely, , hereby certify that I am the owner of King STATE OF WASHINGTON )_ COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gi✓ a niIdik.i(he person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: ±2003 ;L �_- ✓C1 Notary Public in and for the state of Washington My appointment expires: 4 (�1 ! Dl cer. .r tnttkisi41.;:ulLi...i.4.ai i�4i;; File L02 -067 & L02 -068 Request to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0) at 6550 and 6542 Southcenter Boulevard. Applicant's request includes three properties with two houses and an access driveway w/a total of about 3 /4 acre. Two houses sit above Southcenter Blvd, served by a single driveway. A third house, not in the proposal also uses the driveway as its only way in and out. During staff review of the proposal, several issues emerged especially access and traffic. Encroachment: Setbacks are not met. One house and its retaining wall encroach significantly into the neighboring property. Steep unstable slopes: Per the Sensitive Areas overlay, up to 50% of the property lies in a class 3 area of potential geologic instability. Class 3 areas have a high landslide potential with slopes between 15 and 40 % underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, as well as slopes of greater than 40 %. Difficult Access: • The single access driveway has a 22.5% slope. • The driveway lacks the 2 to 3% landing point which is standard for commercial driveways • With the steep slope and high retaining wall, sight lines are inadequate entering or leaving the property. • Despite the traffic light at the bottom of the driveway, the steep slope, lack of landing point and poor sight lines make pedestrian/vehicle conflict likely, especially during wet or icy weather. Traffic and Site limitations • No development is proposed at this time. However, The Traffic Impact Study posited a medical /dental building With over 300 trips per day, including 35 at peak hours. 37 parking stalls would be required. • The City Engineer felt that the driveway was barely adequate for the 3 existing houses which it served. He stated that any increased intensity would require revision to the property access for safety purposes. • The applicant's Traffic Study mentioned the possibility of terracing to provide for parking, and using the developed Schneider family home property easement at 6510 Southcenter Boulevard as an alternative access. These ideas were not expanded upon. RECCOMMENDATION" The properties development potential is limited by site considerations including • Relatively small site size • Steep slopes • Potential geological instability and • Safety concerns relating to access to and from Southcenter Boulevard • Encroachment issues In addition, office facilities are available elsewhere in Tukwila without these factors. Based on the criteria, neither compelling need nor public benefit is demonstrated to merit redesignating LDR to Office. Staff recommends denial of the applicant's request at this time. Staff further recommends that if the applicant 1) resolves property encroachment issues and 2) develops a feasible alternative access plan by December 31, 2003, the City will consider the request as part of the Comprehsnive Plan update in 2004. Staff met with the applicant. He are aware of our recommendation to deny the request. He chose not to be present tonight. Instead, he would like to try to resolve the issues as stated, and submit this information by December 31„2003 for reconsideration. Whether or not the applicant reapplies, he will still need to solve his encroachment problems. z 4 Z J o O 0 co LL, = W O 2 = • a z Z° W U • � O � O I W w LO W Z O ▪ F" z i NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Robb Rezone Signature: riix,, --C� C: \homepage \lukwifa \dcd \apps \COMPAPP.doc, 08/17/00 RE c EN ED CITY OF TUKWILA DEC 31 1tP Department of Community DeveloemNlTY 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WAiib`H- OPM Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E-mail: tuhplan@ci.lukwila.wa.us COMPREHENSIVE PLAN /ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS APPLICATION LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. Tax Parcel no.s 0003200018, 0003200017 and 0003200019 Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This i1 formation may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.— Eric LaBrie /Harley Mattson Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 425- 251 -6222 FAX: 425 - 251 -8782 Date: 1Z-/30/0 Z_ ?) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P- CPA/P -ZCA Planner: e_ Ft X File Number: L 0 2 — 06, 7 (c P,4)� Lp Z —06 SC Application Complete (Date: ) 1 123) o 3 Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: (: 0 2. - 01/. SEP i NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Robb Rezone Signature: riix,, --C� C: \homepage \lukwifa \dcd \apps \COMPAPP.doc, 08/17/00 RE c EN ED CITY OF TUKWILA DEC 31 1tP Department of Community DeveloemNlTY 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WAiib`H- OPM Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E-mail: tuhplan@ci.lukwila.wa.us COMPREHENSIVE PLAN /ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS APPLICATION LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. Tax Parcel no.s 0003200018, 0003200017 and 0003200019 Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This i1 formation may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.— Eric LaBrie /Harley Mattson Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 425- 251 -6222 FAX: 425 - 251 -8782 Date: 1Z-/30/0 Z_ ?) A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: LDR - Low Density Residential Proposed: 0 — Office B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: LDR - Low Density Residential Proposed: 0 — Office C. LAND USE(S): Existing: Office Proposed: Office (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all directions from the property or area for which a change is proposed. immediately surrounding the site the land uses are as follows: North - single family residential; vacant land West - office /commercial and single family residential South & East - Southecenter Bld. and I -405 interchange Between 500 and 1,000 feet from the site are the following: North - condominiums West - commercial /office and single family residential East - I -405 interchange, Green River and hotel /motel South - commercial retail and service station C : \homepage \Tukwila \dcd \ apps \COMPAPP.doc, 08/17/00 io-: ::il lieu: 1. 4�Li `11i'G4�4i:GiYIGI�+iluill.G!G iki:.`fieY'A'fi",H3.T�w�r Jaasxiana ,a.d.* »cx�Y:w:.y,i'y++�ra.: �diFSu Aryt�'7", 5 t t s ltd FV' a -- 01 oo III ki r / ( . ( a O /"" g bd +,, ( 0 °O Z 4 >; rrrru ( 2un'o 10 i o i"sr 8 M3 _- 1 1n SO 14129 _.._. tranu Naar° r I^. L. I-I-.I D Willwr 10751 2 2 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 96032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FM w ... w Oran w .r M... SUR O EWM WAR WO 1M11 LrNNG. IN.W9rYENfK SUMS w.. 1i/ti/ca a •740 For ERIC ROBB 6542 S. 15TH ST. TUKWLA WA 98188 TNb LANDSCAPE PLAN • FOR ROBB REZONE 4 P ON0. \'0 . /I... U/35/5002 alW Ya■ 4.50 r.-m. •■••■ .�4 ... WTI 4 E 9 RECEIVED DEC 3 1• 2002 _ COMMUNIP" NOIDMHSVM Intrau Y(M "3 V 3ONVII '14 CZ dIHSNM01 'CZ NO1103S JO 4/1 33 au. JO NOW40,1 V HATOZMI 11E/021 110A asnairi 4 ' .oct - ES:1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. cid I Ji as as 1. a. 1007. a11 m tlla ( t at NOM 31 Vasco m m..% it 100011030 IOM= 111.n law awn ar a ma 117113 100. a 011110 7177 01011 101 MO a MW 31fl130 al an =WY a OWL Olt 70103011 .913•MMIM n e0®1/ 1.06.11 a aMaar to 1111/01/00 OW 01071371. 71 WO -Ct-0 a • Y. 33It 03300 01313330134 a fat 1100 at 1 1a03mWa MOIDawc 34.31131 SMMR121 MM. s war x 1W.' at Mal 03 Iota 10 aa0071 a00-117 ata • 431•a mft aW • • fa OI tau ass 1N 111110 m® it 000111th fa 0100.01 a J000 aWaalat 11003 in. /I 1$ 1 31110 tab= 0a00 Lmaait 1:fit ]i1011011a1 a11 at a W. n an L.a11pY .e3 t 0371011137/ i am� 1V t110-® Atim-ama WV 0001 tars at M TOM MOM 711 " r0171 M t 11K19Jp1 woe i 1.1 & 41 mat 1>r t 11tH m 1116 t ta•11 DOW/ at YOOY T 0001 all lam • 1M0 AM Ito 0110aO tM • 0RM10 MEMO M aro1M a tai at atom ma a fm0a alfm mar to 071 OM LO. a 1030 701303 •r COMM M a• mm. lYaca at 0•1303 0011 at 1 no at 01101301003 11.11. 6/M at tame at 'Omar 31111a0 1 113 ta m 1000U OM 01•3 . aft 1M01 al Wars= A6 M a a0a16a 0 laM1O !111 MM aaolw 0190.1 0 110 0 6.1 0 Z80O im .. stet 100011 ram row 0111113011 Mal ®aaa M r 1107® OM MI K 0306 70111 3711 t. LWOWa10.3 0100/ IM r O MOM OI fMMM MRS= tale.. 0110116 ae 133=®0 ON 000a fa 01 00 a I 001.00 1131171.• w M >t 011•41.1 Y 1.1 II 10•11100 s 1111111101am 1 11 . a M.. IM !MOM 1.W to two Ma. 110 1aSM if aoaat 1.07167 a 1110 3.1111011601 KW 0300.0 mI. MI 1K 0 IMO 10M1O111 7111111 1 m eat . 37•131 alum 1000000 We two sa 111 a 010101311 a a033 a a 0e0 •.a us a ■4.306 1331107 fr1010.1 1 MI 30aa lafns l a 01130331 .111 la 3•4 16.0 . 1111.4W 1101113 mob OW lal WOW tea 1001 000 r tilts a aQa1 a 00'7 a 4.i - t 9000 a aMW tax 11 al as sow no L a lala tat tw Dal of O 10 005 1l 1110 10.100 IS WW1 01x1 UMW Wow OW OR .0. 11t0W100 tat }1 A MOW y6 000II O KIWI lain at ant WON m l{1 iia It WIZ tat 733001 007 I Sl a W6 tat 37/111101 MI III 111 air I I l l Ml WOW s 170 A a 011.4103 awn a >. a 10 3017 00 MOM a le 0170. 70300 DO M a 00®3 TOM O/ lmar ~OW a a. 103116 M1t.a•12) 106Maa'11Mm far tin 1.• t MO at • 6® ll r.O.t A a 013 O.lm 1MWM N 1aRf M1 a MOM at 573106 SatIlY1NK (el) 1011400530 - wen lmr• a aMC 101 a ano at Mart m as m aa+aa M aMeaa 110t101M 1011100333011 MI 0 at JOSx N. tOt 10 Dal Oa O 0303 710041171 3.4 a0 OM 0 W m JO 0 a 6 f Kea 000 li a 33 Wu f M1M • OlOm1 ant MI M a DOWN TWOS a 01007 0.10. Mt an a 301106 a 110 a., I! 1041101 alma a, La at a a KW 10 WM. 101Q11101 0. m Of 11011110170001107 313003. (LI) I - rterm flats. a 3011 WI 73 7s10 at a alt Cd nta13W WW1 30 MO Oft WMao Aalf_Q 1M 006 a =MD MaQaralaw a a tat a 7E1 M6 10 11 mi lit11a a s NMI 3304 17373AI 1s at MUM rat a NO ix 106 m an WOW IMO 1MW6 3oa a0Ya0 0 W6 a .a. a ...1M tt Mid TRY a a. a a aIr 0300331 We 111 a 0.330 11136 MOW 11111100 1110 A ILL a 040 130101713 M DI MM. fOM= 1011..• Ibis • fOM Ira 101 • a. WW1/a 1 Q nt10113 WOO ID aM Wa1W 1014Wan 1aa at (Y1) b =MI ABAaf1S OIHdVl100d01 1VI11:IVd ONV AIdV4Nf106 10114110S31111.71 11 WM a ba cw SU IIKO IS R a a1 JY at 030I/ad 031101311 21213Y5 330010 11011 fto 110 II aria BM WOW (1M1 •1110 MOM Den war (Si 1a0 alto DIM �® alit Mar WafR010 (Mis ■ ---ht- m. 111. I I a N3031 ,y .0a�1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ` ��� ��N���N�O� DATE O�� �� »�B����O� DATE O�� - ;�N�B����O� / 1-1 - �� �` .�� -_--__-___- _ . - 11 . -. - ,�i ~~ 5 - ' ' '-- ! _ _ ' '-_--- ______ ' ' _ _ _ _ - _____ _ _ ' - 7 ti il _ - ''' - -- ' -_ ' - - ''---_- _ _____' --_____'- - - __ -�~__ . - ' ' -._ MI ' � ' �~�~_~�__~~~ __ -- - , ' # , � ' - . `i _-__. '- � � - - ------- --------- --- ] -i - . _-'_ - - _ - `� ^ ~_�=� / '----- ---'� l x � - . --------- � -----�-----� � . ~-� ---- � ! � — ' '---'_.'_----'--''------ a (� - . - ---'---- - -- --------- -- —' . . { ---- ' � _' } ` / . / . �_ i � | _ �)__ i / u _____ | ________ _______ ___ __ --_-~_' -'' ---' --- _ ______~~�~�~, ' ' _ ___ _i____ _ _ _ fiff No.22540 HASTINGS, ~~LOS ANGELES =���OH.~~ ~~ LOCUST GROVE, GA. U.SA. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.