Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L01-033 - SARA DEVELOPMENT - SHORT PLATLO1-033 SARA DEVELOPMENT 13419 MACADAM ROAD Nora Gierloff - Re: Sara Short PlaT LAND DIVISION LAND DEVELOPMENT From: Nora Gierloff To: Claudia Riedener Date: 10/13/05 2:02PM Subject: Re: Sara Short Plant Hi Claudia, Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila DCD (206) 433 -7141 Let me knoe if that is okay, thanks! Claudia Riedener 253 -274 -0655 ixia c(r7harbornet.com This is an acceptable substitution. When the owner calls for a planning final and bond release this should be documented on the attached forms. »> "Claudia Riedener" <ixia @harbornet.com> 10/13/05 11:10AM »> Dear Nora, We are working on the planting for the S 135th Street site. The plant schedule calls for Rhododendron occidentale. It is a notoriously diffucult plant to grow for nurseries and not available at this point. We would like to replace it with our native Mockorange. Philadelphus lewisii is also decidious and grows to about the same size, pehaps a bit taller. Page 1 .IICHAEL R. KENYON BRUCE L. DISEND SANDRA S. MEADOWCROFT SHELLEY M. KERSLAKE FIEIDI L. BROSIUS KERRI A. BERGLAND WINDY A. ROSTAMI Lars E. Neste Demco Law Firm, P.S. 5224 Wilson Avenue South, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98118 Dear Mr. Neste: cc: Steve Lancaster Nora Gierloff F:\ APPS \CIV\TUKWILA \Letter\LTR00206 - BayDevelopmentAIME/08/03 /05 KENYON DISEND, PLLC THE MUNICIPAL LAW FIRM 11 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 -3820 (425) 392 -7090 (206) 628 -9059 FAX (425) 392 -7071 August 3, 2005 Re: Bay Development Corp. /Sara Development, Inc. The City of Tukwila is in receipt of your letter to the City dated July 12, 2005, requesting the City "not release or sign off' on the bond given to it by Sara Development, Inc. This letter is to inform you that any action taken by the City pertaining to this bond will be in accordance with the bond's conditions and agreements. Any disagreement you may have with Sara Development, Inc. should be addressed to them. Furthermore, the City will not pay your client for landscaping work done to obtain final occupancy approval. Very truly yours, KENYON DISEND, PLLC Peter Beckwith SERVING WASHINGTON CITIES SINCE 1993 LACEY L. MARTIN n��rr PETER B. BECKWITH v Li V er nTHOMAS J. GUI FOIL en THOMAS G. WALLS AUG 0 5 2005 ROMAN S. DIXON D' yFLOP Ni1 MENr TO: Jim Morrow via David McPherson Nick Olivas via Don Tomaso FROM: Nora Gierloff RE: Sara Short Plat DATE: January 27, 2004 FILE: L01 -033 MEMORANDUM The above referenced short plat mylars are ready for final approval. We will not release them to the applicant until he has submitted the required cash assignments. Attached are the documents for recording. Please review these materials and indicate your approval by signing the plat. Jim Morrow and Tom Keefe, please indicate your approval by putting your initials next to your name below. If you do not approve, indicate any additional requirements belo Approved by Nick Olivas Approved by Jim Morrow (initials) (initials) January 23, 2004 Behzad Chaudry P.O. Box 5544 Kent, WA 98064 RE: Sara Development L01 -033 Dear Mr. Chaudry, The City has reviewed the draft recording documents you submitted for the Sara Development Short Plat and has the following comments to be addressed before the short plat can be recorded. 1. Address all items listed in the attached memo from the Public Works Department. 2. Have your surveyor create the mylar recording documents based on the final comments from PW (first section of the attached memo). 3. Provide a bond/cash assignment for the amount of the landscaping that you wish to defer. I have previously provided you with a copy of the necessary forms. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, f' Nora Gierloff / Planning Supervisor Enclosures City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director CC: Dave McPherson, Public Works Q: \OId Projects \Sara\MakeMylars.DOC 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 .£t.::SLtci::.iu.::w'.c:. cr 'iti�lf::it:..i�sA11u..:i•u.� ,.1i;,rfaVcyrGsh vivX:i�io.;�i•'� < a.G= ?: ':l•,;S.5.f, el;�+:;r�; 'ter,.++..' a1la4c0 i fwRli. dwf n+ n'. a/.: btifihUT. 3dti: uL: L^ k: fif3? I?S: vl dliai rsiir4fi'1X1�L"GLS.Y::.::1S:s MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPTARTMENT — Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — Dave McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: January 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Sara Development — 8 Lot Short Plat 13419 Macadam Rd. South, Tukwila Permit Nos. L01 -033 / MI01 -210 / MIO2 -186 Final Short Plat Map & Miscellaneous Comments Short Plat Survey Site Map 1. Provide note on short plat survey site map, to comply with Geotechnical Engineering Reports by Krazan & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 2001 and August 9, 2002 and subsequent geotechnical reports. 2. Add parcel number(s) to sheet 1 of 3 (TL# 261320 - 0150). 3. Legal Descriptions for new lots should include (Subject to an easement for ingress /egress ) etc. Miscellaneous Comments 1. Owner shall provide a Performance Bond or Assignment of Account, in the amount of 150% x the cost estimate, for remaining construction to be completed in the Public Right -of -Way and work within Storm Detention Tract. 2. Owner shall provide a Maintenance Bond or Assignment of Account, in the amount of 10% x the total cost of construction, for work to be turned over to the City as Public infrastructure. 3. Provide copy of all easements for Water (Water District 125) and Sanitary Sewer (Val -Vue Sewer Dist.). 4. Provide copies of all Private easements. 5. Describe Tract `A', regarding future ownership and who will maintain area. z I I = z II— 00 co U) J H LL W gQ U) ❑ I W Z = �- 0 Z I— w U ON ❑ I- wuj F- - . Z w CO 0 z April 7, 2004 Dear Bob, City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Bob Thompson Crescent Homes 425 Pontius Avenue N Suite 125 Seattle, WA 98109 RE: Sara Development L01 -033 In response your letter requesting a revision to the joint driveway location for lots 7 & 8 of the Sara Short Plat, please note the following: 1. Public Works will allow the joint access for lots 7 & 8 to be off of Macadam Road, as shown on the sketch provided. The applicant/owner will need to submit this change as part of their Building Permit(s). I understand that at this time, Crescent Homes does not own this property, and therefore is not able to submit building plans /permits to the City. 2. Future plans shall include information and plans, enough to show how existing driveway for lots 7 & 8 off of 43 Ave. South will be removed, including replacement landscaping. The existing driveway cut at 43 Ave. South shall be removed and replaced with a portion of residential sidewalk, to match the newly constructed sidewalk. 3. In addition to tree no. 75 proposed to be removed, there is an existing power pole near the proposed joint driveway for these lots 7 & 8. 4. The private storm drainage easement between lots 6 & 7, may be positioned further onto lot 6 and away from lot 7, depending where the storm pipe is located within the easement. The owner /applicant shall show on a plan the location of the pipe and easement, for review by the Public Works Department. 5. The proposed changes to the driveway and utility easements should be combined with the documents correcting the errors on the mylars. Only the legal owner of the lots will have the authority to sign and record these changes, so please coordinate with Behzad or provide proof that you have purchased the lots. Q: \OId Projects \Sara\DrivewayChange.DOC Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Page 2 If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 433 -7141. Sincerel Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor CC: Dave McPherson, Public Works Behzad Chaudry, Property Owner, P.O. Box 5544 Kent, WA 98064 z A_z 6 JU U0 co W = J H, W0 c o = W F _. Z F— 0 . Z F— W 2 j O -y OF- w I 1-- U O .Z W U= z MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPTARTMENT — Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor z FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — Dave McPherson�� I)edelopment Engineer ti— W o: DATE: April 6, 2004 _I 0 0 0 SUBJECT: Sara Development - 8 Lot Short Plat w = 13419 Macadam Rd. South, Tukwila co Permit Nos. LO1 -033 / MI01 -210 / MIO2 -186 w 0 ga Request for driveway location change by home builder (Crescent Homes). a _ In response to the letter addressed to you by Crescent Homes, dated April 1, 2004, z I regarding revised joint driveway location for lots 7 & 8, please note the following. 1- 0 zE-- w 1. Public Works will allow the joint access for lots 7 & 8 to be off of Macadam 2 o Road, as shown on the sketch provided. The applicant/owner will need to submit 0 u) this change as part of their Building Permit(s). I understand that at this time, o ►— Crescent Homes does not own this property, and therefore is not able to submit = 0 building plans /permits to the City. �_ iz z to 2. Future plans shall include information and plans, enough to show how existing 0 driveway for lots 7 & 8 off of 43 Ave. South will be removed, including 0 H landscaping as applicable. The existing driveway cut at 43 Ave. South shall be z removed and replaced with a portion of residential sidewalk, to match the newly constructed sidewalk. 3. In addition to tree no. 75 proposed to be removed, there is an existing power pole near the proposed joint driveway for these lots 7 & 8. 4. The private storm drainage easement between lots 6 & 7, may be positioned further onto lot 6 and away from lot 7, depending where the storm pipe is located within the easement. The owner /applicant shall show on a plan the location of the pipe and easement, for review by the Public Works Department. - = CREOCENT HOMES April 1, 2004 Nora Gierloff, AICP Planning Supervisor Department of Community Planning City of Tukwila RE: Request to change driveway access Hello Nora, The existing driveway access for Sara Short Plat Lots 7 & 8 are currently approved to come off 43rd Ave. South. I am asking to review these accesses to see if access could be granted through a joint use driveway off Macadam Road. In looking at the lots I have diagramed the existing utility easements and the joint use access granted for lots 4 & 6, along with the proposal for lots 7 & 8. We would need to remove one tree, which is scheduled to remain. I am asking to be able to replant in place of saving this tree. This appears to be the only two changes we would be asking for. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager Crescent Homes 425 Pontius Avenue North • Suite 125 • Seattle. WA 98109 • ( 3 -6656 • ( 3 -6762 Fax ;` {�r 1501'28 '49 "W l S LOT 8 Nk BSBL 142;04' 513.29' • d Q4S�wC S �-ar id:, 1;44 e Y iVe .�o lP� ' 7 141 L.X S+ ifrL p a ' 'pYUQ »-LcQ XJccAas -' ✓ Las 7 4- .9 L o ` N00 2, 1=43 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 80' 3 BUJ Ls. kPo < \ ken\ O \Lp 91. 18'3 R= 286.4 �': - 216.55' April 1, 2004 Nora Gierloff, AICP Planning Supervisor Department of Community Planning City of Tukwila RE: Request to change driveway access Hello Nora, The existing driveway access for Sara Short Plat Lots 7 & 8 are currently approved to come off 43rd Ave. South. I am asking to review these accesses to see if access could be granted through a joint use driveway off Macadam Road. In looking at the lots I have diagramed the existing utility easements and the joint use access granted for lots 4 & 6, along with the proposal for lots 7 & 8. We would need to remove one tree, which is scheduled to remain. I am asking to be able to replant in place of saving this tree. This appears to be the only two changes we would be asking for. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Bob Thompson Construction Manager Crescent Homes 425 Pontius Avenue North • Suite 125 • Seattle, WA 98109 • (206) 323 -6656 • (206) 323 -6762 Fax .Z • W � •J0: U O. • W= J H, w o' • � 5 w ?. _. Z1.-: I- o• Z I-; 111 uj p 0 O rn • :o H :w -o z.. U • Z • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. December 19, 2003 Patrick Harron & Associates, LLC 14900 Interurban Ave South Suite 279 Tukwila, WA 98168 Attn: Mr. Brian Harron City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Fire Department Nicholas J. Olivas, Fire Chief Subject: Sara Short Plat — Fire Flows to Lot 4 & 6 Dear Mr. Harron, I am responding to your letter dated December 2, 2003, in regard to the fire hydrant locations at the Sara Short Plat. In previous meetings with the proponents of this development it was noted that fire hydrants would be required on both the 43` Ave South and Macadam street frontages. In researching this matter I found that during plan review the Macadam hydrant was overlooked by the City Of Tukwila staff. I will allow the following conditions to be implemented to mitigate the lack of the fire hydrant within the 150 feet of lots 4 & 6. 1) Install a fire hydrant at the intersection of 43` Ave South and Macadam Road. 2) When the Short Plat is recorded the condition of installing a residential fire sprinkler system in the homes to be built on lots 4 & 6 will be noted on the recording documents. I will not approve the recording documents until the fire hydrant is installed or bonded through the Public Works Department. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 206- 575 -4404 or e-mail me at dtomasoCaci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Capt. Don Tomaso Fire Marshal Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -575 -4404 • Fax: 206 -575 -4439 z z J 0 '. co o cn J CO LL W 2 Q = w z �' F- o zF- w 0 o - O F- W uj o w z co P • F- z City of Tukwila Page 2 Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -575 -4404 • Fax: 206 -575 -4439 D z Q • z 6 J U • UO CO U: CO W; W =; J � 1U11 0 ' 2 g LL Q' I _ W Z'. Z �.. I- O Z F-: ut U U ;O -;. a'- 'W • 2 I - I ' EL O W Z (n i Ii O November 14, 2003 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Fire Department Nicholas J. Olivas, Fire Chief The Fire Department has assigned Sara Development the following addresses for the new eight -lot sub division. Lot 1 -13542 — 43 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 2 — 13532 — 43 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 3 —13522 — 43 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 4 — 13435 Macadam Road, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 5 — 13512 — 43 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 6 — 13425 Macadam Road, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 7 — 13434 — 43 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Lot 8 — 13428 — 43 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 98168 The Detention Tract address will be 13405 Macadam Road, Tukwila WA 98168 Tract "A" address will be 13441 Macadam Road, Tukwila WA 98168 If you have any questions please call me at 206 -575 -4404. Sincerely, Capt. Don Tomaso Fire Marshal City of Tukwila .�__.,.....r�,.. ..•.. :in::a`'r a`_ i :: "::i.S'w.i: %is;Jr "e'2':.s.�.�r..S:;tii :+ -6 Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -575 -4404 • Fax: 206 -575 -4439 November 5, 2003 Behzad Chaudry P.O. Box 5544 Kent, WA 98064 RE: Sara Development L01 -033 Dear Mr. Chaudry, City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director The City has reviewed the final plat documents you submitted for the Sara Development Short Plat and has the following comments to be addressed before the mylars can be recorded. 1. Provide a bond /cash assignment for the amount of the landscaping that you wish to defer. I provided you with a copy of the necessary forms at our last meeting. 2. Address all items listed in the attached memo and redlines from the Public Works Department. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor Enclosures CC: Dave McPherson, Public Works Q: \OId Projects \Sara\FinalComments.DOC Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Ste .r .-.1�1,r.re w.+.fv:dt:. [vXn�u.n°..- Lt.�JiFSM.:.:1r4G� fd:' vM a. r�}:. �CStiA. u7Cr::' y �' t'.+ u.: f. S�. L' iiiLCnL. 1yp 'H�I�Nn�Mi�bClL1�.i5'+�J.:C�:: .••1A�tiic+r�+'. Short Plat — L03 -033 TO: PLANNING DEPTARTMENT — Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — Dave McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: November 4, 2003 SUBJECT: Sara Development — 8 Lot Short Plat 13419 Macadam Rd. South, Tukwila Permit Nos. LO1 -033 / MI01 -210 / MIO2 -186 Final Short Plat is complete for Public Works, if the following comments are addressed: 1. Owner shall provide a Performance Bond or Assignment of Account, in the amount of 150% x the cost estimate, for remaining construction to be completed in the Public Right -of -Way and work within Storm Detention Tract. 2. Owner shall provide a Maintenance Bond or Assignment of Account, in the amount of 10% x the total cost of construction, for work to be turned over to the City as Public infrastructure. 3. Owner shall provide Statutory Warranty Deed for turnover of Storm Detention Tract. Form was previously provided to the Owner. See enclosed. 4. Provide draft copies of all Private easements for review by Public Works Department. 5. Prior to final sign -off by the City, the Geotechnical Engineer of record, shall submit a written letter of certification, stating that the project was constructed according to their recommendations. Short Plat Survey Site Map MEMORANDUM 1. Provide note on short plat survey site map, to comply with Geotechnical Engineering Reports by Krazan & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 2001 and August 9, 2002 and subsequent geotechnical reports. 2. Provide note on subdivision survey site map, that no runoff, including downspouts, shall be infiltrated into the ground through "dry wells" or perforated infiltration pipes and trenches. 3. Provide note on subdivision survey site map, that individual house foundation and drainage system, shall provide a specific geotechnical assessment, with final design recommendations. 4. See redlined comments reference short plat survey site map — enclosed. Sheet 1 of 2 — Add parcel number(s) to sheet, as applicable. (TL# 261320 -0150) Revise existing legal description — see enclosed. Revise Surveyor's Certificate — see enclosed. Describe Tract `A', regarding future ownership and who will maintain area. Describe Detention Tract, regarding future ownership and give general description. See sheet for additional comments. Sheet 2 of 2 — Label Detention Tract as Public. Label Tract `A', as applicable. Road barrier shown at the end of 43 " Ave. South has been relocated. Show new location or remove from sheet. Show and label all private utility easements on plan sheet, including storm drainage. Show and label all easements for Water (Water District 125) and Sanitary Sewer (Val -Vue Sewer Dist.), as applicable on plan sheet. Show utility easement for power, etc. Show private driveway easements for ingress /egress. 5. See sample plat map ref. Cascade Glen. Items marked with Orange and with arrow — enclosed for reference. Sheet 1 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 of 4 — Revise Dedication, as applicable. Revise Surveyor's Certificate, as applicable. of 4 — See sheet. of 4 — Provide Vicinity Map Provide Utility Easements Provisions Provide Notes, as applicable. Nora 3 erloff - Sara Development Page 1 From: "Michelle Roedell" <michelle @northwestprimetime.com> To: <ngierloff @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 11/14/03 1:14PM Subject: Sara Development Hello Nora - Thank you for sending me the landscape replacement plan for the Sara Development in Tukwila. I understand that you are expecting the developer to send an updated plan because fewer existing trees were retained than originally scheduled, and that original engineering plans were changed since these plans were submitted. I would appreciate it if you will keep me informed of changes and progress on the plans that relate to this development. Before I begin, I would like to say that I and my concerned neighbors were very disappointed that the tree retention plan submitted to us was changed without any notification to us, and that far more trees were destroyed than what was disclosed to us. In my opinion, Tukwila should clarify their rules for development and the ability of concerned citizens to participate in this area of high public concern. The lack of notification on changes to the tree retention plan was especially troublesome because we were on record as having specific concern about that topic. Also, I would like to point out that the tree retention plan identifying trees that used to exist on the site is inaccurate. I know for a fact that there were a greater variety of trees across from my house than is listed on the plan. For example, there were douglas fir, madronna and birch not shown on the Sara plans, in addition to the big leaf maple, red alder, and cherry trees that are listed on the plans you provided to me. There were also significant numbers and variety of flowering shrubs in that area that do not appear on the plans. That makes me wonder about the accuracy of the plans for the larger portion of the site. I consulted with noted landscape expert Russell Link, Wildlife Habitat Biologist with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, author of Landscaping for Wildlife in the Pacific Northwest, and director of the state's wildlife habitat certification program, about the Sara Development Landscape Replacement plan. He described the plan as a "bare minimum ", and that it does not address the diversity of habitat that used to exist on that site. He indicated that the existing plan does not provide much diversity nor does it significantly address the need for flowering plants. The Sara development site once contained a large and diverse habitat including many flowering trees and shrubs; it was once home to wildlife species that the state has identified as priority species* (please see discussion below). Russell Link suggested liberally adding the following species to the list: Cascara Red Alderberry Osoberry Red Huckleberry Evergreen Huckleberry Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Michelle Roedell 13425 43rd Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 * The following information is from the Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife: "Fish and wildlife are public resources. Landowners, agencies, governments, and members of the public have a shared responsibility to protect and maintain these resources for present and future generations. The department has developed management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats and ( Norev - Sara Development species to provide planners, elected officials, landowners, and citizens with comprehensive information on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. These management recommendations are designed to assist in making land use decisions that incorporate the needs of fish and wildlife. Considering the needs of fish and wildlife can help prevent species from becoming increasingly threatened or extinct and may contribute to the recovery of species already imperiled. Priority habitats are those habitat types with unique or significant value to many fish or wildlife species. Priority species are those fish and wildlife species requiring special efforts to ensure their perpetuation." Page 2 z ce w 6 J UO W = J t- W O ga I Cf W 2 Z �: I- O Z Ill La 0 CI H W W F=- U L- O : ai Z = ' O~ October 23, 2003 Dear Ms. Roedell, Sincere! , ,,.../ Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor Enclosure City of Tukwila Michelle Roedell 13425 43 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: Sara Development Short Plat Enclosed are the revised tree retention and landscape replacement plans for the Sara Development short plat that we discussed earlier this week. The street and utility work is largely complete on site. The owner is planning to bond the landscape installation until after the construction of the houses so that the plants are not disturbed. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 431 -3670. Q: \OId Projects\Sara \TreePlans.DOC Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director • _... mm�errcvrvo.!+✓,.arvwawrrr.�i 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Nora Gierloff- Re: Sara Development Page 1 From: Greg Villanueva To: Nora Gierloff Date: 3/11/03 3:51PM Subject: Re: Sara Development Nora, High, I visited the site today and requested the immediate completion of silt fence and construction limits installation. G. »> Nora Gierloff 03/11/03 11:04AM »> Hi Greg, I have received some complaints from the neighbors of the Sara Development short plat (MI01 -210). I talked with them about tree retention issues, but wondered if you could double check the location of the silt fence /construction limits. There should be no disturbance for 80' on either side of the stream due to geotechnical concerns. There have also been some complaints about construction vehicles blocking the driveways along 43rd Avenue. At the time of preliminary approval Brian said that if this was an ongoing problem he would post the west side of the street no parking. Could you follow up with him to make sure that access for residents is maintained? Thanks, Nora z i � cc 2 6 0O ' W W F- w 2 u _ = d . - w _. z I- O z F- w O • N • W ci I I-- O .. W - O - ~ z i Nora Gierloff - RE: The tree, again. Page 1 From: "Pamela Riess" <pamriess2 @attbi.com> To: "Nora Gierloff' <ngierloff @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/13/03 7:58PM Subject: RE: The tree, again. Thanks for letting me know, Nora. One driveway serving 3 houses certainly is an elegant design! This once peaceful neighborhood will be as overdone and intensely glutted in such a small place as the worst of suburbia. We are indeed fortunate to have on our property some of the finest specimens of mature trees anywhere around. Probably one of the largest Goldenchain trees, flowering pink dogwood, and Deodar cedar, just to list some of the true "specimen" trees. It always does hurt to lose the fine old trees. I appreciate your responsiveness. Best wishes for your new family member. Regards, Lee Original Message From: Nora Gierloff [mailto :ngierloff @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 9:41 AM To: pamriess2 @attbi.com Subject: Re: The tree, again. Hello Lee, Unfortunately I think that even if the tree were left standing the grading and soil compaction required for installation of the sidewalk and driveway would result in the death of the tree within a few years. One of the consequences of the developer losing the southernmost lot was a reconfiguration of the driveway near the tree to serve three lots instead of two. The tree is just in a difficult spot to work around, given the drop off from 43rd and the Fire Department's requirements that driveways cannot be steeper than 15% and houses cannot be more than 150 feet from a hydrant. Since the tree is on a slope, not in a wetland or watercourse buffer, the tree ordinance only requires that the developer replace the tree rather than preserve it. The landscape replacement plan that I left with you shows the calculation of the number of replacement trees required and where they will be planted. I'm sorry that I don't have better news. Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila DCD (206) 433 -7141 »> "Pamela Riess" <pamriess2 @attbi.com> 03/12/03 06:26PM »> Hi Nora, Thanks again for coming by our place yesterday. Returning home tonight I saw that the big maple was still standing, so I must ask if there is yet a chance to preserve it. Realizing that it may be difficult to understand my passion about this 'symbolic' tree, but there it is. Is there some way the fire hydrant could be located further down the ': Nora pierloff - RE: The tree, again. Page 2 road? There is an existing hydrant about 30 feet away. My plea remains, can the tree be saved? Thank you, and best regards, Lee z • Z • W JU U O co W =. J H N LL. W QQ O LL Q I— III z �. �.. O , z U ON WW O , Z LL 0 F- Z : Gierloff - Sara Development Page 1 From: Greg Villanueva To: Nora Gierloff Date: 3/13/03 5:05PM Subject: Sara Development Hi Nora, FYI, on 3/11/03 I instructed the contractor to complete the install of silt fence /construction limits fence in conjunction with other erosion control activities. 3/12/03, no contractor /activities onsite to mention parking concerns on west side of 43rd Av. S.. 3/13, wasn't able to make it to the site. I'll be out of the office 3/14 so will visit site 3/17. G. CC: David McPherson LO1-033 SARA DEVELOPMENT 13419 MACADAM RD (SP) November 22, 2001 Nora Gierloff, Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Siute 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED NOV 2 6 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: Sara Development 8 lot short plat; L01 -033 Dear Ms. Gierloff: After careful consideration, I have decided not to appeal the NOTICE OF DECISION on the above mentioned development proposal. As you know from my previous comments on this proposed project, I have concerns regarding the environmental and neighborhood impact of the project. I see no evidence that Tukwila considers the cumulative impact of development in the decision- making process, although such an assessment is required by state law. What has Tukwila done to evaluate the impact to downstream habitat of this and other developments? I am also concerned about the long -term management and protection of buffer areas. This development in particular is adjacent to a large -scale site that had many problems associated with it, including water control and other issues. I believe that the cumulative impact of another development in the immediate vicinity has not been fully considered. It is my sincere hope that the City of Tukwila will take the measures necessary to strengthen their Sensitive Areas Ordinances. As a concerned citizen, this is one of the most important issues to me personally. I also hope the City will endeavor to remove man -made barriers in the watershed that prevent salmon from migrating to up- stream habitats. Sincerely, Michelle Roedell :a, ■ i:ri• November 1, 2001 Behzad Chauhdry P.O. Box 5544 Kent, WA 98064 Dear Mr. Chauhdry, Utilities City of Tukwila Project: Sara Development 8 lot short plat File Numbers:L01 -033 Short Plat E01 -009 SEPA Checklist Location: 13419 Macadam Road South - 1. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL NOTICE OF DECISION There are three basic steps in the short plat approval process: Preliminary Approval Conditions Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director The Short Subdivision Committee has completed review of your short plat application and determined that it complies with all applicable City code requirements. This letter serves as the Notice of Decision per TMC 18.104.170. Based on the latest project submittal, preliminary approval is granted subject to the conditions stated below. This letter constitutes your preliminary approval. The application was reviewed by the Tukwila Short Subdivision Committee and approved with conditions. The conditions imposed are to ensure the short plat is consistent with the Criteria for Preliminary Approval listed at TMC 17.12.020 C in the Tukwila Subdivision Code. a. The storm drainage system shall be constructed per the Surface Water Technical Information Report and approved civil drawings and shall meet City of Tukwila Surface Water Ordinance Requirements. Contact the Tukwila Public Works Department for permit submittal requirements. 63073 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #1.00 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431.3665 Short Plat L01 -033 Page 2 b. Since the stormwater system will become public the panhandle of Lot 8 that contains the stormwater detention pond shall be dedicated to the City with the recording of the short plat. c. Pursuant to the Tukwila "underground ordinance ", all utilities along your section of Macadam Road shall be placed underground. You may sign a waiver to undergrounding for the portion along 43` Avenue South. d. Extension of the sewer and water lines to the lots shall be approved by the appropriate utility. You will need to obtain all required permits prior to beginning any construction. For water and sewer permits, contact the individual provider District. As -built plans shall be provided to the Tukwila Public Works Department. Access e. A 20 foot wide paved access road built to Public Works and Fire Department standards must be provided to any new structures. Driveway locations must be as shown on the civil drawings submitted September 21, 2001. Fire Protection f. Additional fire hydrants along both street frontages will be needed to meet City of Tukwila standards. Please contact Don Tomaso in the Tukwila Fire Department for spacing requirements. General g. All erosion control measures shown on the civil drawings and discussed in the Surface Water Technical Information Report shall be followed during construction. h. Plant the required number of replacement trees for the trees on slopes 20% or greater that will be removed during grading, construction of driveways and installation of utilities. Please submit a planting plan along with your application for a land altering permit. i. If the project site falls within the citrus longhomed beetle quarantine area set by the Washington State Department of Agriculture you must comply with all recommended insect control actions including on site chipping of all trees to be taken down. j. Install all required site improvements, including those proposed in the short plat application and those identified above as conditions of approval. k. Submit a set of recording documents in record of survey format that meet the King County Recorder's requirements and contain the following items: 1. A survey map as described in the application checklist that is consistent with all of the conditions of approval. The surveyor's oriainal signature must be on the face of the plat. Short Plat LO 1 -033 Page 3 • Existing and proposed legal descriptions for all lots. 3. Legal descriptions of all access, sensitive area and utility easements. Joint Maintenance Agreements for all common driveways and private utilities. This short plat approval decision is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative appeal of the decision on the short plat, excluding challenges to the DNS, is permitted. If no valid appeals are filed within the time limit the decision of the Department will be final. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision (November 22, 2001). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 1. The name of the appealing party. Appeals 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Any appeal shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. 2. FINAL APPROVAL The next step is to install the required site improvements, comply with the conditions of approval and submit the necessary short plat documents (survey, legal descriptions, and other required paper work). You may apply to delay installation of the site improvements up to six months beyond final approval subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. A financial guarantee must be provided to ensure installation. After the documents have been found to be in order, and the all of the requirements of the short plat have been met, the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee signs your short plat which constitutes a grant of final approval. • Short Plat L01-033 Page 4 Expiration 1. The final approved short plat must be filed with the King County Department of Records by November 1, 2002, one year from the date of this preliminary approval or the application will expire. The City may grant a single one year extension if requested in writing prior to the expiration date. 3. RECORDING If you have any questions about this notice please contact the project planner Nora Gierloff at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, The signature of the Chairman of the Short Subdivision Committee certifies that your short plat application is ready for recording. It is your responsibility to record the City approved short plat documents with the King County Department of Records. You will need to pay the recording fees and submit your approved original short plat to King County, see the Recording Procedures handout. The short plat is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. After recording, the County returns the recorded original to the City of Tukwila within 4 -6 weeks, at which time your short plat is considered complete. You can shorten this processing time by hand - delivering a copy of the recorded short plat to the project planner. In many circumstances, building permits on the short platted property may not be issued until a copy of the recorded short plat (or original) is returned to the Department of Community Development. Steve Lancaster Community Development Director Chair, Short Subdivision Committee cc: Dave McPherson, Public Works Don Tomaso, Fire Department Department of Ecology, SEPA Division Dennis & Barb Stensen Lee Loyd Joanne Konrad Poirier Pamela Riess Margaret Bratcher Cathy Bell Susan Hussey Georgina Kerr Brad & Leslie White Michelle Roedell Chris Mitchell Pat Nicolson Don Scanlon Kelli Turner • October 31, 2001 Nora Gierloff, Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RE: Sara Development Short Plat Dear Ms. Gierloff: Please accept these additional comments for file on the Sara Development short plat. I will carefully review the city's "Notice of Decision" on this project, and retain my right to appeal. I know that the 40+ housing development just above the proposed project caused tremendous problems. I believe the cumulative impact of an adjacent development should be considered — its impact on the larger ecosystem, as well as the negative effects on Tukwila residents closest to these developments. I had hoped the city would make any "gray" area decisions on the side of the community rather than a company whose motive is profit, a company with no concerns about quality of life in Tukwila. Thank you for keeping me informed on this project. Michelle Roedell 13425 43 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 z CC 2 ~ w W i 00 N W = J � � LL w J u_ ? . I am trying to contact a former Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife employee by I w the name of John Schneider. I have been told that he is the individual who observed a z fish kill on Southgate Creek just below the development in question. If I find any z 0 evidence of a reported fish kill, I will forward it along to your department. w W o I continue to have many concerns about this project, including my previous comment that p —. Tukwila Sensitive Area regulations seem to be lower than standards established by the 01— ui county and other cities. = v o w z. U 0 z ... E ';.: i L_ L. C•. :i• ^•r'.., '•:7 E_..:Cii(7 1..3 r: VV - A r-t C.:. -- .1%..; ': �� s :. ;.) h i i i•J -• ■ 1 e. a i - •NG14. •YORYL•••r r� .•• -: -AVt'.t•1 tlE`- •• - .. - • emenamial �l� 11 D W 3 �� W m W M Z ✓ Min . F Ism Z rt rri F ore � 111111711111111P11 z UN t t L� >•Cii Y o X70 �� f .�I• EMI I ��� ^� �► ce. 1� .a� {„ I� h% % { � gym � '�'i�rae ' � � 1 51 t gra il l am! lusgialliiii.,1 as a:c: AVENUE ALLEN ��IIII�I MOIL ROBE RT-- ----;a de'? 4.0 c. - AVENUE PLAT OF ......... DE5CAIPTION • AIAlert to JO Jo Theo po/ d 44. °N70'VN ADD /T /ON TO C /TY OF SEAT TL E' cam ris,„3 /h ,a/ /a r.��'i9q /iod o/ Ave b /r/l: - L7 ,ne ix/ o/ Jfx ,YJ1' cans/ a/ Benie// L. c/ah4,3 o/ionp CJo - rl /umber 47 4-17.<12 /20;11 /b the 1/20X91 Pon/ a/lh6/0/a/ //Xixe 5.69'/7 Z4'E. L772. /Z o/anq !/x N. k4 asod Benrxi/L. alb/7S Dao•Aran Coin k on ,hkrfcc/,ao M//7 i'x Cenk. LAI a/ //x Riyh/ a/116y a/ /A: N0/117C n fie, /L or' » CGLnt or& Pun-J Sound Radnac s, Xbcxe 966.47 a/0,79 4s otc a/o rnc /a de 2ght /hrcW// /+' :io' of arc /o //x ,R7 /h✓ ca /4/19 ,.Y, /o on ink../.5e-c//an win /ix (.5./ex atao. / B :r /L.c/a . D4✓.nOan CJoan No 47., /Y.crxc W.87'4/ MOO 0 /any Sad /i e h 0 ppaaint an h`,e Ryh/ tan/f d /he D{tan /:sh Rn'v A`rerxe 4• ` iY. J5.) 34 /t encc Ndo'J9 35..1 3/, .1e-n.c t5. SJ'a5 J6 2424/. //xr,ce /1/d /'.56'64 YV Z04.a0, Thence N.,?4 %7'y'fr /, 4ZE ti/crxL N '0'J424 f1 J9.Z 6 c. /nonce N.JJ'O /J4 W e802.9.1haritz N49' 35L¢ /Y /6 /h✓,ee N6.3 W 5d. 99, / /x /V 73 24,3.30 / /loos c5 C54.54:36 - {1! aAJ D /hems t5 65'02 ;96'/1! 9J7SO, //.t%Ce N7 49J...39 /1xx6 rV ZJ'J7. 2f %Y 10966 //70/xe N. 6'OO'.'.1 %Y. 60119.9 //7cr -z NE 072.124! 1/(287 /a place at Afg/i7n /220. Tixre ,J /c-se /red from /it: °tore cescribcd /Ax/ d it by of Inc ribrdwn /?xr%c o%d Co um4vo anO Ptp;/Sarr Rai/wow i9 // di /crew or as sham on /ia: a /112is/7 /a/ .'n /ea i9 // J //cds and aV4rF7U.10 are. as s'wnn. /9// trar..hys ore /.lured 4, /!,u /rue nor /dian DEDICATION ifnoir 0/1 men bq / /xsc ,on:Jaats /h0/ c%seph A / /en, drid ,'4, 9 /! /kn, h/s lYik. a/ Seol / /e, nthQ Co Slolc of /fbah nq /on, on in fee siinoi otere named /rcx/ of /and, do hereby cak:rc /1741,o/col o/ .4L L ENTOINN ADD /7 /0N 70 C'/ TV OF SL TILE' and do here c*.cheole /o /Ix b/ c ever the /oodi alireA and oyenoeo hereon shorn. h /ri /nvs n/wca/ "ma hare / , o,sl . l or har{ds and seal, /hns 7m day of Hoch. A. 0.1906. ,..Vncd ore spokd ,n /ix: ciao. A / /en presence of F /oro A / /v/ M. 0. Hoynes cfff. f'chordson ACKNOWLEDGMENT S /ok ai frktsh/i on/SS Caunly at If in Th /s /s //o cer /iyy //w/ on bmi 71P cloy a/ March AD. /906, Ibto me 0 r16.br0 f dsie 7n ord : b r /he ,StzY a/i1b.shnylon, r xs /ly dppca.• ed ckuep'' A/kn and f/oro A /er9 nIS a/c%seph A / /en, to me /lnorvn /ok / /,e pusa7s 170/M0 aaa' who execLClcd /he w /h n ins /rumen/ and coch c x JCfora /0 f// LY�l/aoirkogze /O /7K ) '.T! /) ' S /y�'�20d O!d 3coko' /i SOnx 03 OIree and ra'un r c 7 for' /he uses oral purpasas oboe rrx/,hbne 0 /yi, /77q _h0170' ax! Off/00/ sea/ /h43 7" 0'09 of MO/C/A 4 t). 1906• M.B. Haynes il' %i Pul✓ri ,n one' or /x port a/ 0 0h/ on roJidn9 0l oh'J 4as/t a ar ,rr•[ ;. AVENUE . • TO CITY OF SEATTLE „SURVEYED AND PLATTED BY 600o, /A; Lo,E f CONES C/Y,,. ENG /NfE ?J JEArTLE /r./.Y•. MARCH /9 JCAL �•• /MCN LOO FEET E amirxd and oppran d /h,s 9 aoy o/ Mardi 40. /906. 5 ..5' ay..)Y &Vial A L. J /cn/irxe Coun /y Surru Exam i/ed, and approved by 1 Board a/ Coun/y Comm/SJ /on ✓s /h!, 9 dcy a 4. D. /906. P. c% c5m'k ,39 0c9c32 Char/non Aike/ foi record o/ rcyuas/ a M'O. Haynes A-/or .9./906 a/ 4f0 /Min/kJ as/ .9 and fuer-ace ,n valumc /2 a/p7ts ,c /00. Rcfo/dNi/9 Co `)b3h. Be c GLpu ✓doe N { /�il' ACI0 m • nOLUrrn, 04 ..r.r Jim Morrow - Citrus Longhorned Beetle --. Page 1 From: <IMalig @agr.wa.gov> To: <pelfolios @worldnet.att.net> Date: 10/31/01 12:20PM Subject: Citrus Longhorned Beetle Dear Ms. Roedelle, Our project entomologist in charge of the Citrus Longhorned Beetle Program met with the City Public Works Department yesterday. WSDA advised the Public Works Department that the cutting of trees in the new development should not pose a threat to the spreading of Citrus Longhorned Beetle because the new development is over 1 mile from the introductory site, and evidence to date indicates that the Citrus Longhorned Beetle is unlikely to have already spread that far. Thank you for your concerns and questions. Irish Malig WSDA Al mA- z w Ce JO 0 0 . w =, J � W O: 2 u. ¢- c o • CI I— ul; Z �. I— O Z I U • 0 O N , O I- 111 W F .. z W U = ; O z October 25, 2001 Michelle Roedell 13425 43 Avenue 'South Tukwila, WA 98168 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Sara Development Short Plat Dear Ms. Roedell, This letter is in response to the questions in your letter of October 17, 2001. Item 1: w U O P O H No administrative appeal of the SEPA Determination of Non - Significance is permitted, = w although the City will accept and review written comments on the Determination for a period of 14 days (until 5:00 p.m.. October 31 — z U cr The Department of Community Development will issue a decision on the merits of the o short plat itself after completing a review of the application and any comments received. z One administrative appeal of the decision on the short plat, excluding challenges to the DNS, is permitted. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; the harm suffered or anticipated C: \Nova's Files \Sara \f0 12RSP.DOC 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Sake #1.00 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 . .... �n1�_ GitL' fX. iiwri✓.: iddcYi�Sir.:,) Nr�t.'. ry` F�':' i� ' ii= .�`i+�Xf':f!'��d«�yYf'th}w� Steven M. Mullet, Mayor z ~ w CL U-1 JU 00 U)0 J I— � w 2 g ►w I-- _ z � I— 0 Z I— L01 -033 Page 2 by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner's decision on the application must file an appeal in King County Superior Court within 21 days of the issuance of a Notice of Decision by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to the procedures set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. If no appeal of the decision on the permit is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on the permit will be final, and the City's approval of the DNS will be final for both the permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. Item 2: In addition to professional visual observation conducted by the City's Fisheries Biologist, Ryan Partee, electroshocking surveys were also conducted in 1996, 1997, 1999 and 2000. These surveys were conducted to establish the accessible ranges for salmon and trout within the City watersheds. During these surveys that included this portion of Southgate Creek, no fish of any species were observed above its connection with the east fork of Southgate Creek located near the intersection of S. 133 St. and S. 134 Pl. A follow up electroshocking survey was conducted on October 23, 2001. Consistent with the results from previous visual observation and electroshock surveys, no fish species were found within the stream that runs through the proposed development site. The proposed 80 foot buffer is much wider than the buffer distance of 35 feet required for Class 2 streams and is sufficient to protect the water quality and stream habitat of the drainage prior to the water reaching areas accessible to salmonids. *W 'yy:•s: e .�i�+! ::14 . 5iMz3 -.vk_l;r,` artigiZA WwL'k: Item 3: City staff reviewed the subject watercourse during the Fosterview project. Only small wetland areas are present within the "wetted perimeter" of the watercourse channel. These wet areas are confined in the ravine bottom and primarily located in the lower portion near Macadam Road. No slope wetlands (seeps) were observed in this watercourse ravine. Item 4: The City was reviewing the applicant's civil drawings and working with the applicant to resolve geotechnical, utility and civil engineering issues. Until the plans had been adjusted to meet code requirements the full impact of the project could not be determined. At the point when the code issues had been resolved a response letter and revised site plans were sent to the parties of record. L01 -033 Page 3 Item 5: During the time between the end of the comment period and the City's response to the public comments staff was completing its internal review of the project. No approvals or decisions were issued. Item 6: A Determination of Non - significance was issued on October 17, 2001. Item 7: As a party of record you will receive all public notices related to this project, including the Notice of Decision for the short plat. Item 8: I have attached a copy of Tukwila's Zoning Code that contains the Sensitive Areas Overlay regulations (TMC 18.45). You had previously commented about a requirement for a survey to identify pileated woodpecker nesting sites during nesting season. There is no such requirement in either the Washington Administrative Code, the Revised Code of Washington or the Tukwila Municipal Code. According to the Habitat Requirements for Pileated Woodpeckers that I received from the Department of Fish and Wildlife these woodpeckers predominantly nest in large (> 27" dbh) coniferous tree snags. The tree survey of the developable area of the site shows that it contains only alder, apple, cherry and maple, with few dead trees or trees over 27" diameter. Therefore it is unlikely that any nesting sites would be found. The habitat report also mentions that "Protection of riparian habitats and the provisions of significant buffers along streams will provide foraging habitat for pileateds." Approximately one third of the site will be retained as a riparian buffer and therefore continue to serve as foraging habitat. There has been no decision on the recommended buffer area around the escape site of the citrus longhorned beetle. The Sara Development site is approximately half a mile from the release site. If we receive information from the State Department of Agriculture that the area of concern extends that far we will place a requirement on the land altering permit that all trees to be cut down must be chipped on site. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 431 -3670. LO1 -033 Page 4 l'r1( Nora Gierloff Associate Planner Enclosure CC: Mayor Mullet Councilwoman Linder Ryan Partee, Fisheries Biologist David McPherson, PW Associate Engineer Steve Lancaster, DCD Director MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPT. - Nora Gierloff, Associate Planner z i~ FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. - David McPherson, Associate Engineer w ug DATE: October 16, 2001 0 0 u)o cn w SUBJECT: Sara Development - 8 Lot Short Plat _I I co ii ,. 13419 Macadam Rd. South w 0 Short Plat Comments 2 �. u . Short Plat - LO1 -033 co a = w H Submittal for Preliminary Short Plat is complete for the Public Works Department. z I-0 Z ►— uj Informational Comments g U � 1. The owner's request, for waiver to undergrounding of power, was forwarded to the 0 P ci Public Works Director for consideration. It was determined that a waiver, shall be w uj granted only for 43r Ave. South and not for Macadam Rd. South. Any waiver H 0 ` request, to the Public Works Department, must be pursuant to City ordinance no. 14 : z 1607 and TMC Ch. 13.08.100. v H =. 2. The storm detention pond shall be Public and be turned over to the City by statutory z warranty deed. The pond shall be within a separate tract or easement, granted to the City of Tukwila. 3. Applicant shall provide a recorded copy of all private joint use access agreements, and private utility & drainage easements, prior to Miscellaneous and /or Building Permit approval by the City. Da vid McPherson - Sara Development - 8..:.ft Short Plat - L01 -033 Page 1 From: David McPherson To: Nora Gierloff Subject: Sara Development - 8 Lot Short Plat - L01 -033 Nora, Ref. Sara Development - L01 -033, the proposed storm detention pond, located within Lot 8, shall be public. A tract should be dedicated to the City for this purpose. The pond as shown on the submitted Civil plans, is located within the peninsula of the proposed Lot 8. The public storm detention pond, shall be constructed to City standards and specifications. I have recently and in the past, discussed this issue with the owner's representative, Mr. Mohammad Saleem. He is aware of this requirement and he will submit the necessary plans and turnover documents, as needed by the City. Dave October 11, 2001 Dear Neighbors. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: L01 -033 Sara Development Short Plat E01 -009 SEPA Checklist The City has prepared a consolidated response to the issues raised in the comment letters regarding the Sara Development short plat. We hope that you are satisfied with the actions taken. Concern: The shared driveways may not allow drivers to turn around on their property, and therefore residents may back out onto the street. Response: It is common throughout the City for residents to back out of their driveways onto the street. The City Engineer has reviewed this and determined that no traffic hazard would be created by the driveway onto \•lacadam Road. Concern: Visibility is poor for cars turning onto Macadam from 43 Avenue. Response: The developer has submitted a sight distance study establishing that safe turning conditions can be created at that intersection. As part of the drainage improvements the grades will be altered at that spot and the brush will be removed. Concern: The tot seems too small l'or nine homes, the development seems too dense for the neighborhood. Response: The site is just about 3 acres in size. After setting aside the watercourse and steep slopes the buildable area is about 2 acres. Based on the geotechnical engineer's recommendations the developer. has decided to combine lots 1 and 2 to reduce the total number of lots to 8. This results in a density of 4 units per net acre (2.6 units per gross acre), while the Low Density Residential Zoning District allows up to 6.7 units per acre. ' ��: �= .t::1.�v}:.i:a'.o'v:LiY +CiV`Lv tkiini GYP.: tY' x44``' r��.itf1!- *. "rZ":id%F:eYia:lk"ti e.17L_:Id' 1 Concern: The stream on site is a Class III with associated wetlands and fish habitat. Response: Tukwila's Fisheries Biologist has reviewed the letter and visited the site and finds that there are no associated wetlands on the project site. He has not observed any fish species within the project area. Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance classifies the stream as a Type 2 watercourse (different classification system than the letter writer was referring to). Type 2 C: \Nora's files \Sara\NIl Cummems.I)OC Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 '•UR...rw.'•a'Ri%YN L01 -033 Page 2 watercourses are required to have a 35 foot buffer plus a 10 foot building setback on each side. For this site there is also a geotechnical buffer of 80 feet on each side of the watercourse. Therefore all buildings must be kept at least 80 feet to the west of the stream and no development will be allowed on the east side of the stream. Concern: Any development on this site falls under the 4(d) Rule of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Response: The proposed development is not likely to kill or harm listed species and therefore is not affected by the 4(d) rule, which protects only listed salmonids. Concern: Pileated woodpeckers, Coopers hawks, owls and other migratory species have been observed on the property. Pileated woodpeckers are a species of concern as defined by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Their presence requires a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) and a survey for nesting sites during the spring nesting season. Response: Coopers hawk (Accipiter cooperii) is not listed in any capacity on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitats and Species List. Pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus), while listed as a candidate species in Washington State are not listed as Threatened or Endangered. At this time their presence does not require any special examination and since the stream and its adjacent riparian area will remain undeveloped no long term habitat disruption is anticipated. An HPA would only be required if the development involved work below the ordinary high water mark of the stream. The grading and utility plans do not show any work within the stream bed. The existing culvert under Macadam will not be disturbed by the road improvements. Concern: The project is located near the Fosterview Subdivision. That development caused maximum environmental impact and resulted in fish kills. The Sara Development should be required to perform an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) because of the habitat value of the site and its connection to the larger wetland /river system. Response: The City's Fisheries Biologist is unaware of any fish kills directly related to the Fosterview Subdivision. Were these kills reported to the City? The Sara Development project is complying with all applicable regulations including Tukwila's Sensitive Area Ordinance and the King County Surface Water Design Manual. About an acre of stream corridor and riparian buffer will be preserved on site and protected from future development. Concern: Will construction vehicles be allowed to block access to driveways along 43` Avenue? z w U 00 J H w � 2 L I w z = zI- Uca O-- 0 F- w F- � u. O .z w 2 O z L01 -033 Page 3 Response: Staff has discussed this concern with the developers and they have agreed to speak to their contractors and consultants about the need to park with care. If there are problems during construction the City Engineer will be consulted about no parking signs. Concern: Serious effort should be made to keep the larger trees on site. The Fosterview Subdivision did not retain their trees and replacement trees were not correctly planted. Replanting with fewer, larger trees is preferable to small, ornamental, non- native species. Response: The developer has submitted a tree permit showing the locations of the trees to be removed and retained and will meet the requirements of Tukwila's Tree Ordinance. Concern: Will the large maple tree on lot 3 be retained? How high will the houses be? Will any fences or landscaping be installed? Response: The maple tree is shown as being retained on the plans. The houses will meet the LDR height limit of 30 feet as defined in the Uniform Building Code. Installation of fences or landscaping will be up to the individual homeowner. The Sara Development is a short plat, not a subdivision or planned residential development so there are no specific landscaping, fencing or other design standards for the houses or site. Concern: Will street lighting on 43 Avenue be improved? Response: This issue has not been resolved. We will review the details of the street improvement plans at the time of permit. The next step in the process is for the City to issue a preliminary approval letter that states all of the improvements required and conditions of approval. This allows the developer to apply for permits and construct the road, driveway and utility improvements. Once these have been accepted by the City the developer can record the short plat and sell or build on the lots. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Associate Planner CC: David McPherson, Public Works Behzad Chaudry, Applicant ....,,..r.4 •..._L:.L' .�.... Si; v'.1'n ' . •d� r.• 7 , ��• " :aL. fae' .." ofsta ;;Ltkt4 4 . . z �w 6 —J 0 . 00 0 J = H U) u_ w wa = z � 1- 0 zt- w Lu U :O N 0 F- wW _ 1 O ..z w U = 0 z UNDERGROUNDING AGREEMENT WAIVER TO UNDERGROUNDING ORDINANCE OBLIGATION FOR FUTURE UNDERGROUNDING The proposed development at: /3 9/ /1/4c... 4A-7, 7v1 R. Jo LaCJ /4.,1 (street address) Parcel No,.,?( /3.©— O /fib. ' equires undergrounding per Ordinance 486, 924 and 1321. In compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 1607 the property owner of this single - family development has demonstrated application of the Underground Ordinance will create undue hardship if carried out as part of the development. The Owner is obligated to participate in funding future undergrounding improvements for their proportionate share of said undergrounding fronting their property. Furthermore, if the L.I.D. /U.L.I.D. process is used to carry out the construction of this undergrounding, the Owner waives the right to protest L.I.D. or U.L.I.D. formation for this undergrounding. Owner retains the right to contest the method of calculating assessments in such L.I.D. and the amount thereof to be levied against the Owner's subject property, and other property owned by Owner which would be within such L.I.D. This Agreement shall be recorded by the City Clerk with the King County Auditor as required by Chapter 35.91 RCW and the cost of said recording will be paid by the City. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their respective heirs, legal representatives, assignees, transferees and successors. This Agreement runs with the land. OWNER: Owner (signature) Owner (print name) Phone o 2 sab. - l g (03 Street Address Page 1 of 2 q Date �S3 -g,C,0 fig/ /( »7,w4- 9803/ City, State, Zip ......+....... ;,::sr,:....iaJ 2is is iri.121Gut+�rsra4':z iALLYA".4.4.4.6 e4r. Address: /34/9 MA-C4 Co Parcel No.: 0 ,6/3d. .-• 0410 Owner: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of ri I 1.1G On this day personally appeared before me 1 «ZA C }-t P1 C no QL\ to be known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and -foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 44 F, signed the same as N l s free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this Z A da of St. . aool y CITY OF TUKWILA: Public Works Director ) ss Date Page 2 of 2 Undergrounding Agreement Waiver to Undergrounding Ordinance Obligation for Future Undergrounding Chi -P.U.c. Signature /3'll CH6Li 2 �) Dif 1' )5 Print Name NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WA HI /� RESIDING AT My commission expires /i - Qy. n 4 (doc17) .,;:.y:::ls;.iilti'ii•:� u:e?cw.Lh':. :4uvd.wsr',r.:'ti -.° ±:;r'.u».nui 1.:13:x,;; Nora Gierloff Department of Community Relations City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Project by Sara Development at 13419 Macadam Road South As property owners across the street from the proposed development, we would like to express our concerns about this project. We are still living with the daily negative impact of a larger, ongoing project, Fosterview Estates (now Pacific Heights), which has yet to be completed, in spite of construction having started almost 7 years ago. To be direct, we are totally burned out on construction: the noise, dirt, the vibration from the impact of heavy equipment, the stink of diesel exhaust, the list goes on. w g I a . w z Considering the enormous disruption of this once - peaceful neighborhood by the current w O and ongoing, project, we are actually appalled that the city would turn right around and ? o consider overlaying yet another construction -site nightmare on this same little street. U N O— o� tu H V. �" We would like assurance that we will retain access to our property (driveway) at all O z times, and the mail delivery and waste pickup will be unimpeded. In the recent past our v co driveway has been blocked by potential buyers of the (Sara Development) property as t= 0 well as by utility vehicles servicing the Pacific Heights development. With the many people who work and monitor a construction site, there will be many vehicles needing to park, and since our property is currently at the end of the dead end road (43 Ave. S.), the area outside our driveway is quite likely to be considered prime parking turf. Can the (currently) blocked road have the barricade moved to the south to allow for some of the parking? Will the city provide No Parking signs for the area in front of our property for the duration of this proposed piece of work? The following points ... August 16, 2001 Serious effort on the part of the city of Tukwila must be applied to keep some of the larger trees standing — while they may seem an obstruction to construction, the trees would also be an attraction to the new homeowners. The Tukwila City Code specifically protects large trees, although this was totally dishonored in the Fosterview project. Following that outrage, the number of trees promised to be planted have never been planted, and certainly very few of any appreciable size. It would be better to replant with fewer, larger trees than with small, ornamental specimens, non - native and unlikely to survive. The negative effect on the air quality which accompanies the loss of large trees is not to be denied. z ~ 6 -I U U CD Ill J = H We would assume that the large, beautiful native maple tree across from our driveway would be left standing. If not, what will be done to mitigate the destruction of our view? (The sight of such a lovely, venerable old tree is a view to be prized over any freeway view, quite obviously) How high will the houses be? Will there be fences installed, large trees or shrubs planted? Will street lighting on 43` Ave. S. be improved at the end of the road? Right now it is quite dark and the city has refused to add street lighting. We have had a large number of criminal activities occur at this dead end and would like to see more safety measures provided. Noise is always a concern as heavy equipment impacts our quality of life. Just try to have a day off at your own home — or rest in bed when ill- during a prolonged construction project. It's as though we don't even own our home. We pay taxes and mortgage, but can only use our home in the evenings — and even then only if the construction workers will ever go away. Currently the finish work inside and out on the 8 or 9 houses ranged along our property line (350') of the Pacific Heights project involves work seven days a week. We can only be grateful ( ?) that they start late (8 a.m.) on the weekends and that the noise is not as bad as when heavy equipment was used. In summation, there is nothing good or positive that comes to mind around this proposal, other than removal of the derelict buildings currently on the site. As usual, the design for cramped, dense placement of structures is repugnant, even on paper. The Pacific Heights project has developed into something far more hideous even than was represented on paper, with grotesque barracks -like buildings completely covering the tiny lots, with virtually no `yards' and actually no access to the little scraps of turf clinging to the steep bits of land at the bases of these things. Here is where the token trees and token grass is planted, doomed to die because they cannot be tended properly by anyone who may actually choose to live in of the places. Our negative view of this proposed project is based on seven years of solid, first -hand experience living in our home next to an as- yet - uncompleted construction site. Very Sincerely, Lee M. Loyd Pamela S. Riess 13531 43` Ave. S. Tukwila 98168 I Zr GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION August 9, 2001 KA Project No. 092 -01004 Mr. Behzad Chaudry Sara Development, Inc. Post Office Box 5544 Tukwila, Washington 98064 RE: Geotechnical Peer Review Sara Short Plat Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Chaudry, an & ASSOCIATES, INC. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the Shannon & Wilson, Inc Geotechnical Peer Review Letter Dated July 25, 2001, and the City of Tukwila Notice of Complete Application letter Dated July 26, 2001, for the referenced project. The Shannon & Wilson Peer Review Letter indicates that the proposed lot lines, for the residential development, have been revised and we have reviewed these modifications. We understand that the lot lines have been reconfigured to permit house construction and installation of the proposed stormwater detention system on Lot 9. The location for the proposed stormwater detention system on Lot -9 was determined after our geotechnical engineering investigation. Since the nearest exploratory test pit, TP -5, is approximately 140 feet south of the proposed location, we recommend that additional subsurface exploration be performed to verify soil type and groundwater conditions for design and construction recommendations. The Shannon & Wilson letter states that, in their opinion, the explorations, analyses and recommendations for Lots 2 through 8 are generally appropriate. However, it is their opinion, that the lot line revisions may indicate a greater influence of the landslide areas on the proposed Lot 1 and Lot 9 construction, than was anticipated in our original Geotechnical Investigation Report, dated February 20, 2001. Based on our review of the original lot lines and the information obtained during our initial investigation, it is our opinion that the recommended slope setbacks, for the proposed construction, are generally adequate. It should be noted that an extensive subsurface exploration program (with relatively deep drilling and sampling) and a detailed slope stability analysis were not included in the scope of our original work. Based on the initial lot layout and our understanding of the planned construction, it was our opinion that such an extensive study was not warranted and would not be cost - effective, even after observing the slide area. Based on our field observations, it is our opinion that the observed slide is not as extensive as indicated by the Shannon & Wilson letter. The revised lot configuration may indicate a greater than expected landslide influence on Lot 1 and/or Lot 9. Should the City of Tukwila require a detailed study of the existinCElvED CITY OF TUKWILA Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 19501 144 Ave. NE #F300 *Woodinville, Washington 98072 • (425) 485 -5519 • Fax: (425) 485 -6837 PERMIT CENTER ' S1; 7; 41.1 :tiiNa +fin xbt .:- 4417•12x414.6. • landslide, we have provided a separate cost proposal to perform the study in conjunction with the recommended subsurface exploration work for the detention pond located on Lot 9. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Chris Behrens Senior Engineering Geologist Pacific Northwest Division CB /TGB I EXPIRES: 11 / i o / 0 'L I Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Timothy G. Beckerle, P.E. Engineering Manager Pacific Northwest Division KA No. 092 -01004 August 9, 2001 Page No. 2 r ;'.�•:,, k'.til;,:��':'.ti fl xit:!: i2: i„' si:: ii? i'; iJti: 4, 1se<`::_ if. a' i.: i+:>r:.! a.K1 ?`.7'!sr�o:4;.Uii:•:i+�+i3: »::d`w'c?:[e a:a,�:'�� 7 Proposed Sara Short Plat (Located South of the Y- Intersection of 43 Avenue South /Macadam Road South and South 135 Street) SURFACE WATER TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT July 22, 2001 it EXPIRES 11/3L° - L Prepar a ror eIILdl houdary Prepared by: Kok -Wah Tung, P.E. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA U 3 5 PERMIT CENTER Description Existing Proposed Difference SF Acre SF Acre SF Acre Pervious 92,280 51,290 2.12 1.18 51,290 63,780 1.18 1.46 40,990 (12,490) 0.94 (0.29) Impervious - - 28,500 0.65 (26,000) (0.60) Total Basin Area 143,570 3.30 143,570 3.3 - - SECTION I Project Overview The Technical Information Report (TIR) provides an overall drainage review and includes all up- stream and downstream potential drainage impacts as well as on -site drainage analysis. The TIR also addresses design considerations and mitigation. This project proposed construction of 9 single - family residential homes. The subject property is located south of the Y intersection of 43 Avenue South /Macadam Road South and South 135 Street, Tukwila, Washington. The property is located in the northwest quadrant of section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. The site is triangular in shape and encompasses approximately 3.3 acres. All stormwater calculations and proposed water quality standards are based on King County Surface Water Design Manual 1998. Existing Site Conditions: The site was undeveloped, except for the proposed Lot No. 8 where an existing house (abandoned) is located, and proposed Lot 7 where an existing garage (abandoned) is located. The southern portion of the property is occupied by a natural drainage gulch and is designated as an open space buffer area. The proposed development will occupy the central, and northern portions of the site. On this portion of the site the slopes vary between 10 and 43 percent grade and slopes towards the northeast. The gulch is relatively steep. The soils underlying the site are relatively impermeable. The general soils classification is AmC Alderwood which is glacial till. Table 1 Impervious and Pervious Areas Existing Drainage: The existing runoff from the site is collected by the onsite drainage gulch and catch- basins located on South 135 Street. The general direction of flow in the drainage system runs northward. Proposed Site Conditions 2 The proposed site will be divided into 9 lots . Lots No 1, and 3 abuts a Type 2 water course according to Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45. The code requires a 35 foot -wide buffer on each side of the water- course. -• -. . -. ..�Si�x4td1�! }.:`.�.•, icy.' titer. �Uf�+ ���.`' �`' 1" utiN{' j#: �x'£ 2c' �:'.: ��` is��:!'safia,:�i?�i%:%rk,56'k, Description Existing Proposed Difference SF Acre SF Acre SF Acre Pervious 92,280 51,290 2.12 1.18 51,290 63,780 1.18 1.46 40,990 (12,490) 0.94 (0.29) Impervious - - 28,500 0.65 (26,000) (0.60) Total Basin Area 143,570. 3.30 143,570 3.30 - - Proposed Drainage: Stormwater Design: Design Criteria Regional Scale Factors: 1.0 SEATAC KCRTS Soil Group: Till KCRTS Cover Group: Pasture/ Grass Mitigation Measures Table 1 Impervious and Pervious Areas The geotechnical engineering investigation report recommended that roof runoffs and footing drain runoffs from proposed structures be tightlined into existing storm -drain system. The proposed drainage system will consist of catch- basins in the driveways of each lot and will be collected by the main conveyance system located at the eastern end of the site and discharged into the wet and dry pond at the north end. The pond will be located at the lowest section of the site. After treatment for quantity and quality, the runoff will be discharged into the nearest existing catch -basin No. 11. The City of Tukwila has adopted the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual as their standards for water quality /detention volumes. The 1998 standard requires using the King County Runoff Time . Series (KCRTS) modeling program to evaluate the stormwater control for the proposed development, and to analyze and design the required water quality /detention volume. All proposed projects must provide on -site flow control facilities to mitigate the impacts of increased storm and surface run-off generated by the addition of impervious surfaces and related land cover conversion. 3 The superintendent informed that the site is subject to flooding. Level 2 flow control will be implemented for this site. Stormwater control requirements for this site are that the duration of post - development peak run -offs matches the duration of the 50% of the 2 year through 50 year predevelopment peak discharges. The proposed development proposes a stormwater facility that will provide both detention and water quality treatment. The runoff from the roofs as well as the driveways will be collected by the catchbasins located each driveway. The catchbasins are then connected by the main conveyance system of 12 inch diameter pipes and then discharged into the wet pond /dry pond. Level 2 flow control will be implemented for this site. Stormwater control requirements for this site are that the duration of post- development peak run -offs matches the duration of the 50% of the 2 year through 50 year predevelopment peak discharges. z = cc w 6 J 0 0 co w = F 2 u w 2 u _ = a � z = H 0 Z F- LU w 0 O - a '- W _ O .. Z w U= 0 z Period (Year) Developed (CFS) Undeveloped (CFS) 100 0.787 0.617 25 0.442 0.329 10 0.388 0.280 5 0.366 0.255 2 0.262 0.156 Detention (Level 2 flow control) Water quality volume Total volume 6900 cubic feet 6400 cubic feet 13,300 cubic feet Results of the KCRTS run The peak discharge for both the predeveloped and developed are provided in Table 2. Using level 2 flow control the detention volumes determined is approximately 6900 cubic feet. Stormwater treatment guidelines call for providing a water quality treatment volume to three times the volume run -off from the annual storm (0.47 inch) over the area of development. Table 3 below provides the detention and water quality treatment volumes. Table 2 Flow Frequency Analysis - Peaks Rainfall Region - Sea Tac Table 3 Wetpond /Dry Pond Size 4 Construction of the Combined Wetpond /Dry Pond The proposed pond will consist of 2 cells with a low (approximately 4 feet high) earthern dike separator. The sideslope of the pond shall not be steeper than 3H:1V. The City of Tukwila has requested that the proposed pond to be lined with either a heavy plastic pond liner (of at least 40 mils) or a bentonite clay liner. There will be at least a foot of soil on top of the liner to keep the liner in place. —I —I (Joins sheet 11) Y: • — 05 dik ■.1 U) 0 REAM:). 2.8 MI. IC 114'.•TO INTERSTATE 90 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ..1 J. N. : • —:.• • r • - Th r.• . • :. RENTON 2.3 MI. - n m Co m 0 —I 0 0 0 • t • SCS Soil Type SCS Hydrologic Soil Group KCRTS Soil Croup Notes Alderwood (AgB, AgC, AgD) C Till Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Till Arents, Everett Material (An) B Outwash 1 Beausilc (BeC, BeD, BeF) C Till 2 Bellingham (Bh) D Till 3 Briscot (Br) 'D Till 3 Buckley (Bu) D Till 4 Earlmont (Ea) D Till 3 Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3 Everett (EvB, EvC, EvD, EwC) A/6 Outwash 1 Indianola (InC, InA, InD) A Outwash 1 Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpD) C Till Klaus (KsC) . C Outwash 1 Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1 Newberg (Ng) B Till 3 Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3 Norma (No) D Till 3 Orcas (Or) D Wetland Oridia (Os) D Till 3 Ovall (OvC, OvD, OvF) C Till 2 Pilchuck (Pc) C Till 3 Puget (Pu) D Till 3 Puyallup (Py) B Till 3 Ragnar (RaC, RaD, RaC, RaE) B Outwash 1 Renton (Re) D Till 3 Salal(Sa) C Till 3 Sammamish (Sh) D Till 3 Seattle (Sk) D Wetland Shalcar (Sm) D Till 3 Si (Sn) C Till 3 Snohomish (So, Sr) D Till 3 Sultan (Su) -. C Till 3 Tukwila (fu) D Till 3 Woodinville (Wo) D Till 3 Key to Notes: 1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth ( <5 feet) by glacial till, they should be treated as till soils. 2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program- Fortran) by King County Surface Water Management shows bedrock soils to have similar hydrologic response to till soils. 3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils. 4. Buckley soils are formed on the low permeability Osceola mudflow. Hydrologic response is assumed to be similar to that for till soils. • . October 20, 1995 CREATING A TIME FRIES FILE (EXAMPLE) TABLE III -1 EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN SOIL TYPES CLASSIFIED BY U.S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE AND KING COUNTY RUNOFF TIME SERIES „ �� KCRTS User's Guide III -5 LANDS III-4 SECTION M Figure III -2. Rainfall Regions and Scale lliali k V- 044_ k i t a ' Ykti k 411 414 1:P . rfalle- 1 : 010 �,�' kiggi r t �1 0 Itilltilligh i� III illir'IWI fliNg �`l r 11�111 ram lk IL, IIIIF . 1,,, . kififill ThcomA r r .,,II'' ' C � . 1 '�� r Iii lA ...1 1 6 %VA- . i • ST1.0 -- — MORN Are LA 0.8 wrier *�► - LA 0.9 .4 t KCRTS User's Guide a I 3 't ST 1.0 ST 1.0/ � ^";}7X%��i �F K ^. Y?}•�:i': �YA:i,i"X ;. �..� ST1.0/ - LA 0.8 B. LA 1.0 LA 0.9 - December 15, 1995 LA 1.0 LA1.2 LA 1.2 :': /MO QU AtM oG 0.4 0.3. 0.1 0 1.00E -05 1.00E -04 Proposed Sara Development Level 2 Flow Control 1.00E -03 1.00E -02 Probability Exceedance 1.00E -01 - RDout - � - Predev 1.00E +00 w, 7/29/01 z zW W � J U• 00 N 0 : W I• W J LL <. 'co = d ; F- _ . z �. o. .z U 0 N ' 0 = g z w U= 0 Z Core Requirement #2 - Offsite Analysis (1.2.2) SECTION II Conditions and Requirements Summary This section addresses the requirements set forth by the King. County Surface Water Design Manual Core and Special Requirements listed in Chapter 1 Based on the 26,000 square feet of new impervious surface added,a full drainage review is required. This necessitates addressing all eight Core Requirements in addition to five Special Requirements. See Table 1. KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL CORE REQUIREMENTS Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location (1.2.1) The 100 -year peak flow for the developed condition of the project site, 0.79 cfs, is greater than the threshold value of 0.5 cfs therefore, all surface and storm water runoff from the proposed development will be routed and discharged to the detention pond. Runoff from this site will not create a significant adverse impact to downhill properties or to surrounding drainage systems. See Table 2. The outlet of the dry/wet pond will be discharged into the City of Tukwila's stormwater system Adverse impacts on the downstream and /or upstream drainage system will be alleviated. The project does not change the rate, volume, duration or location of discharge to /from the project site. Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control (1.2.3) To mitigate the impacts of increased storm and surface water runoff generated by proposed development , level 2 flow control will be implemented. Also, because the additional new impervious area exceeds the 5,000 square foot threshold, water quality facilities have been provided. Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System (1.2.4) All engineered conveyance system elements for the project were analyzed, designed, and will be constructed to provide a minimum level of protection against overtopping, flooding, erosion, and structural failure. Culverts and ditches were sized to allow for 25 -year peak flows in the developed condition. Core Requirement #5 - Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (1.2.5) The project will provide erosion and sediment controls to prevent, to the maximum extent possible, transport of sediment from the project site to downstream drainage facilities, water resources, and adjacent properties. To prevent sediment transport, both temporary and permanent Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) measures will be used. r 41 z w cc 6 2 JU 00 co 0 cu cu � LL w o 2 _ u = w z = F- O w ~ n o 5- o 1- w w I E- - o .. z w U � O z Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operations (1.2.6) Maintenance and operations of the drainage facilities on this project is the responsibility of the City of Tukwila. Drainage facilities will be maintained and operated in compliance with King County maintenance standards. Care will be taken to assure scheduling consistent with wildlife and fisheries concerns. Standard Maintenance: STANDARD MAINTENANCESTANDARD MAINTENANCE Facilities will be maintained by standards set forth in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Special Maintenance: SPECIAL MAINTENANCESPECIAL MAINTENANCENone Core Requirement #7 - Financial Guarantees and Liability (1.2.7) The drainage facilities on this project are being constructed by and for King County. Therefore, no bonds will be required to comply with the financial guarantee requirements mandated in King County Ordinance 12020 and the liability requirements of King County Code 9.04.100. The two types of financial guarantees for projects constructing or modifying drainage facilities are: a) the drainage facilities restoration and site stabilization guarantee, and b) the drainage defect and maintenance guarantee. Core Requirement #8 - Water Quality (1.2.8) The wet pond will be used to treat the runoff from the new impervious surfaces and pollution- generating pervious surfaces. KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Special Requirement #1 - Other Adopted Area - Specific Requirements (1.3.1) This project is not in a designed Critical Drainage Area (CDA), or in an area included in an adopted Master Drainage Plan (MDP), Basin Plan (BP), Lake Management Plan (LMP), or Shared Facility Drainage Plan (SFDP). Therefore, the drainage requirements associated with these adopted areas do not apply. Special Requirement #2 - Floodplain / Floodway Delineation (1.3.2) 10 This project is not adjacent to a stream, lake, wetland, or closed depression. Also, there are no King County regulations requiring a study of flood hazards in this area. Therefore, delineation of the 100 -year floodplain boundaries does not apply. Special Requirement #3 - Flood Protection Facilities (1.3.3) This project does not contain or is adjacent to a Class 1 or 2 stream that has an existing flood protection facility (such as a levee, revetment, or berm). Also, this project does not propose to construct a new or to modify an existing flood protection facility. Therefore, there are no flood protection facilities that need to be analyzed and /or designed to conform to the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) regulations (44 CFR). „-• a7, . S w C�i .f � xtuiit t F.L,cS;r3 ",.- r %ay�+.5� rs; �'r d�l,'�i�`.�Yt�``v+' !!. �s�. i3{ �! r`` „t:,�ai�aii�.d,'r'.'(�".::s1F^� SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS This project is adjacent to steep slope hazard areas as defined in King County Ordinance 9614. 11 z z . 6 UO C W = ;. F .., co u_ ui g N = . 0 ; , _ ? F- ; F- O Z ;O 5 ; 0E— w w 2 - O • Z w O F— Z The project lies within the Green/ Duwamish River. UPSTREAM ANALYSIS Not needed. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Not needed. SECTION III Off Site Analysis 12 u,i.:i'.:..4�1 • �..il.'.:... tiin'.'euii:f�+� ��:c:.zL'�:i . w 0 0. w = ,. J H; LL W 0 : 1 Q _ D. = z z t- g ? � :o w W . • • u. - O w Z: o NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Impervious calculations: Predev: off site (1500 sf) existing house (1000 sf) area calculations sara Postdev: Houses -> 9000 sf = 0.2066 acres driveways -> 20'X(62 +72 +103 +68 +20) = 6,500 sf = 0.1492 acres sidewalk +minor widening - >(6 +3)'x645 {for macadam} = 5,805 sf = 0.1332 acres - >(5 +4)'x800 {for 43rd} = 7,200 sf = 0.1625 acres Pervious Calculations: predev: 92,281 sf (till grass)= 2.118 acres 51,290 sf(till pasture) = 1.177 acres post dev: 51,290 sf (pasture) = 1.177 acres 92,281- 28,505 =63776 sf (till grass) = 1.464 acres Page 1 z z 2 O 0 LLJ W I F- • u_ W O 2 g - cn = Z � F-0 Z LLI ~` 0 O �, O = 0 O 1j UD H : O KCRTS Program...File Directory: C: \KC_SWDM \KC_DATA\ [C] CREATE a new Time Series ST 0.00 1.18 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 sara.tsf T 1.00000 T [T] Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module [P] Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies sara.tsf sara.pks [R] RETURN to Previous Menu [C] CREATE a new Time Series ST Sara.exc 0.00 0.000000 Till Forest 0.00 0.000000 Till Pasture 0.00 0.000000 Till Grass 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Forest 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Pasture 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Grass 0.00 0.000000 Wetland 0.00 0.000000 Impervious 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Till Forest 1.18 0.00 0.000000 Till Pasture 1.46 0.00 0.000000 Till Grass 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Forest 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Pasture 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Outwash Grass 0.00 0.00 0.000000 Wetland 0.44 0.00 0.000000 Impervious Page 1 i� SI Z iH W ' J. 0: U O. CO CI 1 11.1 • W: W J u- <i 52 d . - W Z H- I- O Z ~ 0. .0 :0 1- :W W, • O w Z. U � .1= Z sarapo.tsf T 1.00000 T [F] Size a Retention /Detention FACILITY Automatic Design test.rdf rdout.tsf rdout.dur F F 36 -9999.00 - 9999.00 0 Return to Main Menu Sara.exc Page 2 rx Q 2 W D - J 0 0 CO CI: • W; W 2' - J W O LL I--- W Z I- O z I- w w V� o , CI F- LU Ur H U. I" V-4 • Z z 1 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:predev.tsf' Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.273 0.140 0.329 0.059 0.156 0.280 0.255 5 0.617 1 Computed Peaks Peak Flow Rates-- - Rank Time of Peak 4 2/09/01 14:00 7 1/05/02 16:00 2 2/27/03 7:00 8 8/26/04 2:00 6 1/05/05 8:00 3 1/18/06 16:00 11/24/06 3:00 1/09/08 6:00 - - Peaks (CFS) 0.617 0.329 0.280 0.273 0.255 0.156 0.140 0.059 0.521 Flow Frequency Analysis - Rank Return Prob Period 1 100.00 , 0.990 2 25.00 0.960 3 10.00 0.900 4 5.00 0.800 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 7 1.30 0.231 8 1.10 0.091 50.00 0.980 000000000000000000000000000000000000 fri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U) 000000000000000000000000000000000 f=4w aN3Wl00a 3H130 ) i iVflO 3H1 Ol 3na SI 11 3011ON SIH. NVH11:1V210 5531 SI 3VJV kI S1H1 NI 1N3WflOOa 3H131 30I10N 00 H Nm °Dakar lO N N ri Lf) 01 V' N N W VAN L(1 O N H 01 N V1 N H N 1/40 V' W M Lf1 • .D V10101D 0 •• M H N H N Lf) N Lf) CO 0) 01 01.-. 0 Vl (N t0 0 GO N N CO O1 'O w 0) V N r) CO W H 01 0 Lf1 4 U3 N H U) M Lf) -4 r-L U) VI N LV) N V 0 H 10 CO M Lf) O N V' O LO CO Lf N •• LD .1i N '.0 0 0 0 N J - ) •i riNNMM VrCDM re) O1Lf)HL V 1riO1lf) U1M (NI r1rLrL re) U1L LDONrid+lO MOaD tOU) V VI[rU1L 1-I E. H H N N C) •+ Vl U) to '0 N 0) 01 O H (11 m V• Lf1 lD L` O OI H N M to 'D a) O O) 0) 0) 0) 01 0) 0 H M U) LO O O N V• L0 03 0 N •+ O L Hr-I l'i■i rirIr-IH H NNNNNNNNNNNNNMMMMMC V+V V o U) 00 01 H N M • In rH U) 01 M 1O 01 H UD c0 N W 'O CO 0 N M Lf) L CO 0 rf m W U) L� CO O ri r-L M U) 01 M CO N '7 M O ID H N N IO H U) 01 M L� O) N 0 OOOHHHH.4NNNMMM V• Vr W VILO Lf) If) Lf1Lf) L�L�f'sr- L�03000Oc000c00101OOHNNMM Lf)U)U)'OIOIO 01� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H • U) r4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U fn -rf U 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000 0)-. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 1J 0 H r n V 1 Ul N O 0) H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O N M Lf) l0 00 O1 H M N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 aJ W o0o00000r -INMd1 Lc) IO L 00010ri(M•41Ln L's 00010HNM V LC/ IOL�00010H ririHHHriNNM V'Lf)IOL�00010HNM V .� . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 00000000000000000HHHHHHHHH INNNNNNNNNNM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Vi Tr Vr Vi 4.5200 4.5400 4.5600 4.5800 4.5900 4.6100 4.6300 4.6500 4.7500 4.8500 4.9500 5.0000 5.1000 5.2000 5.3000 5.4000 5.5000 5.6000 5.7000 5.8000 5.9000 6.0000 6.1000 6.2000 6.3000 6.4000 6.5000 6.6000 6.7000 6.8000 6.9000 7.0000 0.171 0.173 0.177 0.183 0.189 0.197 0.206 0.209 0.222 0.234 0.244 0.249 0.720 1.57 2.68 3.98 5.45 6.89 7.42 7.92 8.39 8.83 9.25 9.66 10.04 10.42 10.78 11.12 11.46 11.79 12.11 12.42 5516.5 5562.3 5608.4 5654.7 5678.0 5724.6 5771.5 5818.6 6057.8 6302.9 6554.1 6682.0 6942.3 7208.9 7481.8 7761.0 8046.7 8338.9 8637.6 8943.0 9255.1 9574.1 9899.8 10232.5 10572.3 10919.1 11273.0 11634.2 12002.7 12378.6 12761.9 13152.7 0.00 Base Facility Elevation 0.0 Minutes /Inch: Average Perm -Rate 1 Facility Type 5.00000 Depth (ft) 3.00000 Slope - Horizontal Component - 1.00000 Tank Diameter (ft) 3 Number of Orifices 5.00000 Riser Head (ft) 18.0000 Riser Diameter (in) F Bottom Permeable (logical) F Sides Permeable (logical) F Notched riser (logical) T Triangular Notch (logical) - 1.00000 Notch width (in) - 1.00000 Notch angle (degrees) (specify) filename 28.2843 Facility Length (ft) 400.000 Facility Bottom Area (sq ft) 0 Primary Hydrograph postdev.tsf Hydrograph & inflow TS file rdout outflow TS file 7 Year 2409 Hour 0.617000 Target peak discharge rate 2 Year 3584 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target peak 5 Year 2633 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target peak discharge rate discharge rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 riser ouflow rating curve peak discharge rate peak discharge rate peak discharge rate peak discharge rate peak discharge rate Starting Menu selection Starting Window Final Window height (ft) diameter (in) discharge (cfs) height (ft) diameter (in) discharge (cfs) height (ft) diameter (in) discharge (cfs) - 1.00000 Notch height T Create Document File F Calculate Peaks F View Peaks T Notify when peak dates change T Plot Peaks T Calculate Duration F view durations T Plot Duration F Plot Peak Stage F Plot Duration Stage rdout.pks Peak file 1 rdout.dur Duration file 1 target.pks Peak file 2 target.dur Duration file 2 (specify) Peak file 3 (specify) Duration file 3 (specify) Peak file 4 (specify) Duration file 4 F Calculate Volume 10/ 1/ 0 0:00 Volume Start Date 10/30/ 0 23:00 Volume End Date F Calculate D/S Compliance dsout D/S Compliance OutPut file (specify) D/S Tributary file (specify) Reservoir file 0.000000 D/S Compliance Lag T POC is discharge compliance (else stage) 6 Year 1301 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target 0 Year 3147 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target 4 Year 666 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target 1 Year 2321 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target 3 Year 7900 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target 1 Iteration 1 Iteration 1 Iteration 0.000000 Orifice 1.30000 Orifice 0.102477 Orifice 3.10000 Orifice 1.50000 Orifice 0.841038E -01 Orifice 4.50000 Orifice 1.80000 Orifice 0.621278E -01 Orifice �v:��.+F .::4: S: • uiis ..tia2ti: 1 v uCftF�i�.:.?rmsri+a�i: is sas ......f.....u..a....nu. -- �• .• : i•• • .. .• ' :�+..t�� — e ^•,'••• w��.u;y:y�'. e. _ ['.Siaxa 51!RP Development 50k.4-6h of Y- int of 43rd Ave S cu-.d Macc,,dam Road 5oufi1-,. V r = volume of rur,of f from mean anneal st Ccf) At = ore.a._ of imp2,rvious surfoce C5 s) A = of - Hl I soil covered with B rass Csf) 6 A tf = area or till sail covered wi +t-, forest C ) p = Greo- of Ou +WQSh soil Cover Wifih Brass or forest Csf) cn R= m i r f ca l 1 Jr m m eci n G n n ua (st r wi C �►-� ck�,o) J u Nw W 0 ' g -J � = a I- z = i- zI U o (2 : 0 H w w. o w z v =. o z Area o impervrou5 surd = 2.8, 500 s f Areci o$ till soil covered w(1 k Bross = 51,3001- 03, goO 115, ro0 5f R = 0.9- " C from kCSW13 M l9 roa.8e 6 -6cl Figure 6.4- I -q) + 0-10 1 0.610) x (R /2) = C O- x 2S, 500 + 0.25X '15 x 0-4-7 12 = 9000 -I- 6500 t 5805 ± 7.200 r 2I 2 0 0 Depth ft Length ft Width ft • Length/width Ratio Area sq ft Volume cubic feet Cumulative Volume cu ft 0.00 65.00 10.00 6.50 650.00 893.00 893.00 1.00 71.00 16.00 - 4.44 1136.00 1415.00 2308.00 2.00 77.00 22.00 . 3.50 1694.00 2009.00 4317.00 3.00 83.00 28.00 2.96 2324.00 2675.00 6992.00 4.00 89:00 34.00 2.62 3026.00 3413.00 10405.00 5.00 95.00 40.00 2.38 3800.00 4223.00 14628.00 6.00 101.00 46.00 2.20 4646.00 5105.00 19733.00 7.00 107.00 52.00 2.06 5564.00 6059.00 25792.00 8.00 113.00 58.00 1.95 6554.00 7085.00 32877.00 9.00 119.00 64.00 1.86 7616.00 8183.00 41060.00 10.00 125.00 70.00 1.79 8750.00 Proposed SARA Short Plat Date:7 /22/01 Submittal to City of Tukwila Sideslo 3.00 Calculation of Pond Volume NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. The maintenance requirements for each of the drainage facilities are listed on the following pages. Maintenance of all proposed drainage facilities is the responsibility of the owners of the lots which are served The maintenance requirements are according to Puget Sound Stormwater Management Manual Appendix A, "Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities" and include: Maintenance Component General Defect Trash and Debris Road Surface Settlement, Potholes. Mush Spots. Ruts Access Roads/Easement Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet, i.e., trash and debris would fill up one standard size garbage can. Blocked Roadway Debris which could damage vehicle tires (glass or metal). Any obstructions which reduce clearance above road surface to less than 7 feet. Any obstructions restricting the access to a 10- to 12 -foot width for a distance of more than 12 feet or any point restricting access to less than a 10 -foot width. When any surface defect exceeds 6 inches in depth and 6 square feet in area. In general, any surface defect which hinders or prevents maintenance access. Vegetation in Road Weeds growing in the road surface that Surface are more than 6 inches tall and less than 6 inches apart within a 400- square foot area. Shoulders and Erosion Damage Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more Ditches than 8 inches wide and 6 inches deep. Weeds and Brush Weeds and brush exceed 18 inches in height or hinder maintenance access. Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Trash and debris cleared from site. Roadway free of debris which could damage tires. Roadway overhead clear to 7 feet high. Obstruction removed to allow at least a 12 -foot access. Road surface uniformly smooth with no evidence of settlement, potholes, mush spots, or ruts. Road surface free of weeds taller than 2 inches. Shoulder free of erosion and matching the surrounding road. Weeds and brush cut to 2 inches in height or cleared in such a way as to allow maintenance access. Maintenance Defect Component Storage Area Manhole. Catch Basins Plugged Air Vents Debris and Sediment Closed Detention Systems (Pipes/Tanks) Joints Between Tank/Pipe Section Tank/Pipe Bent Out of Shape Cover not in Place Locking Mechanism Not Working Cover Difficult to Remove Ladder Rungs Unsafe Conditions. When Maintenance is Needed One -half of the cross section of a vent is blocked at any point with debris and sediment. Accumulated sediment depth exceeds 10% of the diameter of the storage area for 1/2 length of storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15% of diameter. Example: 72 -inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 inches for more than '/2 length of tank. Any crack allowing material to be transported into facility. Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape more than 10% of its design shape. Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open manhole requires maintenance. Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than %2 inch of thread (may not apply to self - locking lids). One maintenance person cannot • remove lid after applying 80 lbs of lift. Intent is to keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. King County Safety Office and/or maintenance person judges that . ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, rust, or cracks. See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Vents free of debris and sediment. All sediment and debris removed from storage area. All joints between tank/pipe sections are sealed. Tank/pipe repaired or replaced to design. Manhole is closed. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover can be removed and reinstalled by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance persons safe access. See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 Maintenance Component Pipes Defect Sediment and Debris Vegetation Damaged Sediment Vegetation Side Slopes Erosion Conveyance Systems (Pipes & Ditches) Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through pipes. Protective coating is damaged; rust is causing more than 50% deterioration to any part of pipe. Any dent that decreases the cross - section .area of pipe by more than 20 %. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through ditches. Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where cause of damage is still present or where there is potential for continued erosion. • Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. All vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. Pipe repaired or replaced. Pipe repaired or replaced. Open Ditches Trash and Debris• Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per Trash and debris cleared 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. from ditches. Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and debris so that matches design. Water flows freely through ditches. Slopes should be stabilized by using appropriate erosion control measure(s): e.g., rock reinforcement, planting of grass, compaction. Maintenance Defect Component General Trash and Debris (Includes Sediment) Catch Basins Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Trash or debris of more than '/2 cubic foot which is located immediately in fromt of the catch basin opening or is blocking capacity of basin by more than 10 %. Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking more than 1/3 of its height. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate odors that would cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g. methane) Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume. Structural Damage to Corner of frame extends more Frame and/or Top Slab than 3 /4 inch past curb face into the street (if applicable) Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than' /, inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into the basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e. separation of more than 3 /4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in Basin Cracks wider than 'h inch and Walls/Bottom longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/Misalignme Basin has settled more than 1 nt inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil, and gasoline. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking more than 10% of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed No trash or debris located immediately in front of catch basin opening. No trash or debris in the catch basin. Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris. No dead animals or vegetation present within the catch basin. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Frame is even with curb. Top slab is free of holes and cracks. Frame is sitting flush on top slab. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than '/4 inch wide at the joint of inlet/outlet pipe. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No flammable chemicals present. No vegetation blocking opening to basin. No vegetation or root growth present. Catch Basin Cover Ladder Metal Grates (if applicable) • Pollution Cover Not In Place Locking Mechanism Not Working Cover Difficult to Remove Ladder Rungs Unsafe Trash and Debris Damaged or Missing Non - flammable chemicals of more than' 'A cubic foot per three feet of basin length. Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less than 'A inch of thread. One maintenance person cannot remove lid after applying 80 lbs. of lift; intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% of grate surface. Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. No pollution present other than surface film. Catch basin cover is closed. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover can be removed by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance person safe access. Grate openings meet design standards. Grate free of trash and debris. Grate is in place and meets design standards. c 15�•.:�5:�. + "N�...+ v.u:[fai:.il1•.".�iix�� u 4 Maintenance Defect Component General • Trash and Debris (Includes Sediment) Structural Damage Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Obstructions Overflow Pipe Obstructions Manhole Catch Basin Control Structure/Flow Restrictor Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Distance between debris build- up and bottom of orifice plate is less than 1 -1/2 feet. Structure is not securely attached to manhole wall and outlet pipe structure should support at least 1,000 pounds of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and snow signs of rust. Any holes —other than designed holes —in the structure. Cleanout gate is not watertight or is missing. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one maintenance person. Chain leading to gate is missing or damaged. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Control device is not working properly due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. See "Closed Detention Systems" Standard No. 3. See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed ' All trash and debris removed. Structure securely attached to wall and outlet pipe. Structure in correct position. Connections to outlet pipe are watertight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate moves up and down easily and is watertight. Chain is in place and works as designed. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards. Plate is in place and works as designed. Plate is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Pipe is free of all obstructions and works as designed. See "Closed Detention Systems" Standard No. 3. See "Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 • Date: (o —S - DIRECTIONS January 25, 2001 City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist City of Tukti. . ESA Screening Checklist Applicant Name: .S A c Z'Vo LPn'?c -v Street Address: c a ,S0 0 _ l d s7 City, State, Zip: /L 6 i ( tAfrAt '"l90,3( Telephone: 9s0 - /2 9 f This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. CITY RECEIVED CI q 1�! Of 1 UKWI4.A JUN 2 6 2001 PERMIT CENTER / i;� .:� :. :d#= :cr`.":s'.i�ic •_ i:::i, r ,.:c..�t:. ;a�:�..::.u::.«1..c:.ti .vuh:.x� .: •r a wn:.wt.: ..... cw;c...,�:.:.:aai. 41 1 - 0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling., clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 ( Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 . (` Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. l Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 - 0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. O' Continue to Question 6 -0 - YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 City of Tula . ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. January 25, 2001 7 Part A (continued) City of Tuk- .i ESA Screening Checklist 6 - Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 - Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. -) Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 - Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) - Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25, 2001 3 2 - 1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) ( S Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 ( E - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 - 3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. (NO / ontinue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 - 4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES ontinue to Question 2 -5 2 - 5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. ( b Continue to Question 3 - (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 - (Page 2) Part B (continued) • City of Tula. .r ESA Screening Checklist 1 - Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 - (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 - 0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. January 25, 2001 4 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. DTO Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. W Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3` • Will the projedt result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. &Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. ba GN . Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers'as part of a maintenance activity s •uld answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -6 • S - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 City of Tula. t ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 5 ....,..,''•: ii :�::`xas;:sJ:"yS:t.3S:t���::�e ^`, �s" '; e+ tz% n�v' tt' ��} r, ' s�1i' Y+ ir�r"' �,''"�"NS' &,�;�.S�aafis�L4'J.a4 'i.':6Sihi _.. _ Z _ ►- w tr 00 ill = H wO 2 Q CO = � Z = z 0 I- w uj 0 - w w u'O .. Z w U= 0 F- Z `C PAWil ANWaisk rte, �� �ti Part D (continued) City of Tuk1. .i ESA Screening Checklist 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) .., .:) ). , _::. x-,. e,. �,:•` js '.�f.:.f:�i:�l.:<�eadZ . _ `£ N:xit Y _ h.(, w:fe%s:+&:x�i: January 25, 2001 6 /`ra czy% ..741a/ d ' v. /kwov,1G 6wIlek-o e c..2-rn Short pjafe i34 l fied d (� / �Cl1f/ l �lS a 3 — S h a r . f ?kit" L�d�zo - T� L SERA- (.../69 a / • //U //f zqc/ vrrieh- t�: %39/0 -- � . -� ✓� <s 54 >4 S Qr- .,+...W.. mare y...w.•.- -..._. lj''Y.Jhsil *1' Z W a UO ( W J W • O u. d = ▪ W Z 0 z U • CI O — O F- w I I- 0 u' O W Z — I 0 z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila • AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , Lest. te HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name:. s a. ra. toz tic /opriefi+ Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's Signature: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: 40 Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of •Si gni ficance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda y Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3 day of A a ti in the • year 200!" P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name:. s a. ra. toz tic /opriefi+ Project Number: L- o t -o33 $hor/ Pk* � /- -. ? TWA Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: 40 ✓a„_ Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3 day of A a ti in the • year 200!" P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(ici.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I ,LH2 4h GM-Ca-WY (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on (" Z - 0 1 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at v so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number /...01 —053 3 . I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applicant or Project Mai Signature On this day personally appeared before me !?e.41 2!i D Cha ut/c/ey to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /shesigned the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this o day of � Agee, i Q : O %OTAR , �:: �I/ NOTARY PUBLLIC in and for the State of Washington v PUBLIC (1) • i residing at Kerri, 6 'D32 i <� ■ .), • 7 7.9.03 i '•;:.... My commission expires on /F0? m - 03 t ki O / . WAVr — z � w J U 0 CO w= — J 1.— N LL w a • a = z � 1--0 z I- w w U 0 Your application for a nine lot short plat located at 13419 Macadam Road South has been found to Pp p o be complete on July 26,2001 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. = The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this I— letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you O Z need another set of those instructions, please call me. v cn Once you have notified me that the notice board has been installed I will post it with a laminated z copy of the Notice of Application and the comment period will start. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. July 26, 2001 Mohammad Saleem Behzad Chauhdry P.O. Box 5544 Kent, WA 98064 RE: L01 -033 Sara Development Short Plat E01 -009 SEPA Checklist Dear Mr. Chauhdry, The City has the following substantive comments on your application: 1. Please respond to the attached peer review of the Krazan geotechnical report. Lots 1 and 9 will require some additional engineering. Please also revise the report so that the buffer recommendations reflect the current lot configuration. 2. In your APRD waiver request you asked that the sensitive area tract include only the watercourse buffer and that the geotechnical buffer be covered with a no build/native growth protection easement. We will consider this request for the west (house) side of the lot but it does not make sense to leave an unbuildable swath on the far (east) side of the lots. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to C: \Nora's _Files \LETTERS \S araComp le te. DOC City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions feel free to call me at (206) 433 -7141. Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Associate Planner cc: Dave McPherson, Public Works Steve Kohler, Fire Department C: \Nora's_Fi Ies \LETTERS \SaraComplete. DOC z a z ; ne u6 s :U O. co U, ,co W J H, Q LL WO co a . = a • z' F-; • =' Z I— W 0 I--' W �2 W —O .z Cu E_ .O z Bent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. -ti 206 695 6777; 07/25/01..15:38; JetFax #736;Page 2/4 7. SHANNON taW1LSON,1NC. GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS July 25, 2001 Mr. Dave McPherson, Associate Engineer City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 Dear Mr. McPherson: AT TLE RICHLAND F.LIRDANK5 ANCHORAGE DENVER GAINT Oul5 3(141 ON RE: GEOTECHNICAL PEER REVIEW, SARA. SHORT PLAT PROJECT, 43" AVENUE SOUTH/MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, TUTCWILA, WASHINGTON This letter presents the results of our review of a geotechnical engineering report for the proposed Sara Short Plat project. The project site is located south of South 135 Street and east of 43` Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington. The northern limit of the site is the southeast corner of the intersection of these two streets. The purpose of our work is to offer an opinion as to the appropriateness and adequacy of the geotechnical engineering report submitted with the permit application. The geotechnical report for this project was prepared by Krazan & Associates, Inc. and dated February 20, 2001. The report presents the results of eight test pit explorations and geotechnical recommendations for site development. The test pit explorations extended to depths of 10 to I3 feet and encountered various soils including loose sands, very dense glacial till and stiff to very stiff clay. The report provided brief descriptions, buffer distance recommendations, and opinions on stability for each of the proposed building sites described as Lots 1 through 9. The report also provides general site development recommendations including retaining wail and foundation design parameters. Based on our review of the Krazan report and our observations of current site conditions, we have identified potential geotechnical concerns associated with proposed Lots 1 and 9. We take no exception to the opinions and recommendations provided for proposed Lots 2 through 8; however, because the proposed lot lines have been revised after the Krazan report was published, we recommend that Krazan & Associates review the currently proposed short plat and supplement the February 2001 geotechnical report to address these concerns. 400 NORTH 34Th STREET • SUITE 100 P.O. BOX 300303 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98103 206.832.8020 FAX 206.695-6777 TOO: 1.800.833.6388 21 -1- 09433 -001 ,Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Mr. Dave McPherson, Associate Engineer City of Tukwila Public Works Department July 25, 2001 Page 2 206 695 6777; 07/25/01 15:38; JetFax #736;Page 3/4 With regard to Lot 1, we take exception to the geotechnical recommendations provided. Our site reconnaissance revealed the presence of a relatively extensive landslide that crosses the southern property boundary of Lot 1. The landslide is evidenced by a prominent head scarp extending along the northern shoulder and driving lane of 43` Avenue South. The head scarp enters Lot 1 at a point located approximately 230 feet south of the road barrier that was recently erected to close off 43` Avenue South. Based on the apparent size of the landslide, it appears possible that the landslide could extend well into Lot 1 and could adversely affect development on this property. The exact location and dimensions of the landslide headscarp and toe were not determined as part of our scope of work; however, it is our opinion that generally accepted geotechnical principles and practice in this area would include preparation of a detailed study of this landslide prior to developing recommendations for building any structure on Lot 1. The study should include accurate delineation of the landslide toe and head scarp, soil borings to identify the depth and geology of the sliding layers, soil borings to identify subsurface conditions at the building site, a slope stability analysis to determine future slide potential, and geotechnical recommendations for mitigation of the slide and construction of building foundations. If further study indicates that the landslide extends into other building lots, then additional analyses would be warranted for those lots. With regard to proposed Lot 9, the short plat application indicates that a stormwater detention pond (vault) will be located at the north end of Lot 9 between 135 Street and 43r Avenue South. The dimensions of the proposed vault were not provided; however, it appears likely that some excavation will be required adjacent to the city streets. Irvour opinion, generally accepted geotechnical practice would require that subsurface explorations to at least the depth of the proposed vault excavation be performed. The information from these explorations should be used by the geotechnical engineer of record to identify soil and groundwater conditions at the excavation site and to develop recommendations for slopes and shoring to protect city streets and buried utilities. • SUMMARY SHANNON &WILSON, INC. In our opinion, the geotechnical report prepared for this project meets the generally accepted standards of practice in this area for development of lots 2 through 8; however, it appears that the 21.1- 09433- 001 -L 1.DOGWPBET 21 -1- 09433 -001 ,Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. -, 206 695 6777; 07/25/01 15:39; Je[Fax #736;Page 4/4 Mr. Dave McPherson, Associate Engineer City of Tukwila Public Works Department July 25, 2001 Page 3 short plat design and proposed house locations have been revised since the geotechnical report was completed and some of the original assumptions may no longer be valid. The geotechnical engineer should review the current plan and provide supplemental information that addresses the issues discussed above for Lots 1 and 9, and provides additional opinions and recommendations as deemed appropriate by the geotechnical engineer of record. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions I am available at (206) 695 -6875. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. EXPIRES 4/21/02 Martin W. Page, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer MWP :SRB /mwp 214- 09433001- LI.DOCJWP/EET SHANNON ,WILSON. INC. 21 -1- 09433 -001 August 17, 2001 Nora Gierloff Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA RE: Sara Development proposed nine lot short plat project at 13419 Macadam Road South Dear Ms. Gierloff: Please accept my written comments for consideration on the project cited above. I have several concerns about this proposed development — both as an immediate neighbor and as a concerned citizen. As a neighbor, I am concerned about the increased traffic, noise and numerous other factors associated with this project that will adversely affect the quality and livability of my street. I must also express safety concerns regarding the limited sight of oncoming traffic when exiting my street (43 Avenue South) onto Macadam Road South. The proposed driveways exiting directly onto Macadam will face even greater dangers due to the winding street and limited sight of oncoming traffic. A nine lot shortplat seems far too dense of a development, especially because the site has a stream and associated wetland on it. Perhaps of even greater importance than the livability /safety issues are the concerns I have about the environmental impact of this project. According to John Beal of the Green/Duwamish Watershed Alliance, the stream on the proposed site is a Class III stream with associated wetlands. The presence of fish in the stream has been observed, and there is evidence of associated wetlands (wetland plants and standing water have been observed). The stream and associated wetland are part of the larger watershed — this area is the beginning of the stream artery and as such provides food for the salmon and other wildlife that occur farther downstream, including the Duwamish River. I have been told that the bentic life (vital for the health and well -being of salmon and other wildlife) originates in the stream in question. The health of this stream and associated wetland is far greater than just the footprint of the proposed development and indeed impacts Salmon Restoration efforts underway on the Duwamish River and throughout the Pacific Northwest. John Beal has advised that any proposed development on the site falls under the 4 D Rule of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Because of the stream and apparent presence of an associated wetland, the project warrants a Phase III Wetland Delineation. I've been advised that the classification of this stream recommends a setback with 100 foot minimum, not the 80 feet listed on the site plans. Also, other northwest -area development projects were required by law to include setback on the associated wetlands — not just the stream itself. I believe that any development to take place on the site in question must include a minimum of al00 foot setback from the stream and associated wetlands. In addition to the wetland/stream issues, I want to bring to the attention of the city Wildlife Species of Concern, as defined by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. I have often seen Pileated Woodpeckers on the property, as well as Cooper's Hawks, owls and numerous migratory birds species. The presence of the stream and the presence of Species of Concern warrant a Hydrolic Project Approval Permit from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The WDFW also requires that the area must be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting sites of Pileated Woodpeckers, Cooper's Hawks and other species. The survey must be completed during the spring nesting season (April and May). According to a WDFW representative, no development activity can take place on the site until the survey is complete — i.e. bulldozing or other destruction of trees and plantlife is not allowed until after the survey is completed. The proposed project is located directly below another housing development project. I know that the current 40+ housing project directly above the proposed site caused MAXIMUM— not minimum environmental impact to the area. Fish kills directly associated with development activities were reported. Maximum environmental impact on this area can already be documented — for this reason I believe Tukwila is responsible to ensure the ecological health of the proposed development, and to completely consider that wildlife habitat and the larger ecosystem it serves. Because of the negative impact readily observed due to the current development located directly above the proposed development, because this site provides habitat to important wildlife species, because the stream/wetland on the site is directly tied to a larger wetland/river system that provides habitat for salmon and other important species, I request that an Environmental Impact Statement be completed on the development in question. Restoration, erosion control and monitoring of stream sites can be far more costly in the long run than in ensuring proper protection in the face of development pressures. I know that millions of dollars in public funding has already been spent to restore and protect habitat in this area— I believe that the public is entitled to ensure protection of its investment of these millions of dollars. It is my understanding that the environmental checklist associated with the proposed development must include all of the factors that I've listed above. I have been authorized to write this letter on my behalf and on behalf of the Tukwila residents listed below. Thank you for your careful consideration. Sincerely, Michelle Roedell 13425 43 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 244 -6394 Chris Mitchell 13425 43` Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 Brad & Leslie White 13429 43` Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 Margaret Bratcher 13003 56 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98178 A Cathy Bell 14126 34 Place South Tukwila, WA 98168 Susan Hussey & Family 13457 Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98168 Georgina Kerr 3834 S. 116 Tukwila, WA 98168 Pat Nicolson 14800 Interurban South Tukwila, WA 98168 Don Scanlon 14106 55 Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 Kelli Turner PO Box 68754 Tukwila, WA 98168 Dennis & Barb Stensen 4430 S. 150 Tukwila, WA 98188 To: City of Tukwila Planning Division Very truly yours, Sara Development, Inc Behzad Chauhdry Ref: Sara 8 Lot Short Plat This is to request you for the single time extension of the preliminary plat approval of Sara short plat located at 13149 Macadam Rd So. Work on the site improvement and utilities have started. LIJ JU! U U O ;. cn 1.11: W = Jam U LL W O. LL Q: = • a' �. W . Z �, o. z �,. uj U ;O co ,0 1— W = U' LI O co .Z W U .1 z May 31, 2001 Nora Gierloff Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Sara Development Short Plat Dear Miss Gierloff: I would like to thank you for your comments regarding this project, dated May 22, 2001. As we discussed in our meeting on May 29, 2001, we would like to apply for a waiver on buffer area per TMC 18:45.060.2. As you recall, there is a water course located on the south side of this property. The required buffer for this water course is 35 feet on both sides for a total of 70 feet. In addition to this there is a geotechnical buffer shown in the Geotechnical Report in Figure 2. The purpose of the geotechnical buffer is to ensure that there are no structures placed within its limits, because there is a potential for geotechnical instability. However, it can be left as an open space for recreational use. As per City of Tukwila code, sensitive areas need to be protected by becoming separate Tracts. We will comply with this by making the buffer area for the watercourse into a separate Tract, 35 feet on both sides of the watercourse centerline for a total of 70 feet. However we are requesting a waiver for the additional buffer area as mentioned in the geotechnical report. We will not build any structures in this buffer are/Out we would like this area to remain as part of the lot for use as open area. We hope that you will take this request into consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional clarification please contact me at 425- 931 -6863. Sincerely, 4.44/4 Mohammad Saleem, Owner Representative CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 6 2001 pt, e..,. nr kl-rr.'q May 22, 2001 Mohammad Saleem Behzad Chauhdry P.O. Box 5544 Kent, WA 98064 Dear Mr. Chauhdry, Vie. City of Tukwila RE: L01 -033 Sara Development Short Plat E01 -009 SEPA Checklist NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Your short plat and SEPA applications have been found to be incomplete. In order to be complete applications the following materials must be submitted: Application for an Administrative Planned Residential Development or a letter requesting a waiver per TMC 18.45.060 2. Tree Permit application, including the location, type and diameter of all trees to be removed from the site and a replacement plan for trees removed from slopes over 20 %, per TMC 18.54. Completed Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist. Grading plan that shows how access driveways with a maximum slope of 15% will be constructed to each of the new house sites. The placement of fill and/or retaining walls required to achieve access should be addressed in the geotechnical report. Please include cut and fill calculations. Copy of the most recent title report for the property. Upon receipt of these items, the City will re- review them for completeness and will mail you written notification of completeness or incompleteness within 14 days. In addition to the items identified above required for a complete application the following items should be addressed in your resubmittal: 1. Revise the geotech report to reflect the current lot configuration. Please also clarify the width of the required geotechnical buffers for lots 1 and 2, since the numbers do not add up to the buffer shown on the plat map. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 2. Show the watercourse and geotechnical buffers separately on the plat map. The area within the buffers will have to be set aside as a sensitive area tract to be held in common ownership by the abutting parcels. In order to assure that it will be protected we will require that a split rail fence be constructed at the buffer edge on all sides with signage indicating that it is a sensitive area per TMC 18.45.060 6. These applications will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.105.070(E). If you have any questions with this matter please call me at (206) 433 -7141. Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Associate Planner CC: Dave McPherson, Public Works Steve Kohler, Fire Department z z, rt �~ w 00 c o w =. J H W O U- - Z �. I- O Z �— w U • 0 .O - 0 H W W, F • LL H - O : .. z W 0 MV • tea. wit ° inaw�: ` , .\ AWAMILMIlt ..I..n 11. WAIL ...a... 7... J ....�. I ... aw ..ii i t■ r_ L .:JI r A z ~ a: 2 -J C.) 00 co 0 W = J LL W O . Q c 0 d I-W 2 Z � F- O z I- w U0. O - 0 1-. W W U Prepared for: LL'O Z' MR. BEHZAD CHAUHDRY 0 =, SARA DEVELOPMENT, INC. = POST OFFICE BOX 5544 0 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98064 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SARA DEVELOPMENT TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PROJECT No. 092 -01004 FEBRUARY 20, 2001 Prepared by: KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION 19501 144" AVENUE NE, #F -300 WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON 98072 (425) 485 -5519 - © IKraZl & ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS ,...:.Lin ;. �: �.. �: r<. y. �.. Wr. �, ��� :�:�_��......�.,�.::.s;t•::.w February 20, 2001 Mr. Behzad Chauhdry Sara Development, Inc. Post Office Box 5544 Kent, Washington 98064 a,ZaZ 8z; ASSOCIATES,INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION \; V 2 5 H j I KA Project No. 092 -01004 • .. RE: Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Report Proposed Sara Development Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Chauhdry: In accordance with your request, we have completed a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the referenced site. The results of our investigation are presented in the attached report. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. CB /cb Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN AND Chris Behrens Senior Engineering Geologist S. INC. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 19501 144 Ave. NE #F-300. Woodinville, Washington 98072 • (425) 485 -5519 • Fax: (425) 485 -6837 092 - 00024 -Juanit Point.doc L _ = MINWIN K r azan 86 ASSOCIATES,INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING 2 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 3 SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 GROUNDWATER 4 SEISMIC CONDITIONS 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 Erosion and Sediment Control 7 Site Preparation 8 Groundwater Influence on Structures /Construction 9 Structural fill 9 Drainage and Landscaping 10 Utility Trench Backfill 10 Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork 11 Lateral Earth Pressures for Permanent Structures 11 Foundations 12 Testing and Inspection 13 LIMITATIONS 13 �"l"3l" 1.•:." ` � • n+i.+PSI.WwL�S "3s:fx7. `a� "4:a !1[•ti'..:ri11�i<tJ4kt VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN CROSS SECTIONS FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Appendix A Appendix B Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 19501 144 Ave. NE •Woodinville, Washington 98072 • (425) 485 -5519 • Fax: (425) 485 -6837 092.01004 Sara Development.doc 1 1 2 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE & ASSOCIATES,INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SARA DEVELOPMENT TUKWILA, WASHINGTON KA Project No. 092 -01004 This report presents the results of our Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the proposed Sara P P g g g P P Development to be located south of the Y- intersection of 43` Avenue South and Macadam Road South, ' in Tukwila, Washington. Discussions regarding site conditions are presented herein, together with conclusions and recommendations pertaining to site preparation, temporary shoring, structural fill, utility trench backfill, drainage and landscaping, foundations, concrete floor slabs and exterior flatwork, and retaining wall/basement wall design parameters. A site plan showing the approximate exploratory test pit locations is presented following the text of this report. A description of the field investigation, exploratory test pit logs, and the exploratory test pit log legend are presented in Appendix A. Appendix A also contains a description of laboratory testing phase of this study; along with laboratory test results. Appendices B and C contain guides to aid in the development of earthwork and pavement specifications. When conflicts in the text of the report occur with the general specifications in the appendices, the recommendations in the text of the report have precedence. This investigation was conducted to evaluate the soil, slope, and groundwater conditions at the site, to make geotechnical engineering recommendations for use in design of specific construction elements, and to provide criteria for site preparation and structural fill construction. Our scope of services was performed in accordance with our proposal dated November 22, 2000 (KA Proposal No. P00 -361A) and included the following: • A site reconnaissance by a member of our engineering staff to evaluate the surface conditions at the project site. • A field investigation consisting of excavating eight exploratory test pits on the subject site. The test pits ranged in depth from 10 to 13 feet to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions at the project site. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 19501 144th Ave. NE #F -300 • Woodinville, Washington 98072 • (425) 485 -5519 • Fax: (425) 485 -6837 092 -01004 Sara Dcvelopmcnt.doc r.. y,�•rrv yey�! KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 2 • Performing laboratory tests on representative soil samples obtained from the borings to evaluate the physical and index properties of the subsurface soils. • Evaluation of the data obtained from the investigation and an engineering analysis to provide recommendations for use in the project design and preparation of construction specifications. • Preparation of this report summarizing the results, conclusions, recommendations, and findings of our investigation. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand that design of the proposed single family residential development is currently underway; structural load information and other final details pertaining to the structures are unavailable. On a preliminary basis, it is understood that the development will consist of construction of 9 single - family residences. The residences will be one- to two -story structures with slab -on -grade foundation systems. Footing loads are anticipated to be light to moderate. In the event the structural or grading information detailed in this report are inconsistent with the final design, the Geotechnical engineer should be notified so that we may update this writing as applicable. SITE LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is located south of the Y- intersection of 43 Avenue South and Macadam Road South, Tukwila, Washington. According to the U.S. Geologic Survey, 7.5— minute Des Moines topographic quadrangle map, the property is located in the northwest quadrant of section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. The site is triangular in shape and encompasses approximately 3 acres. The site is bordered on the west by 43r Avenue South, residential properties, and Southgate Park, to the east by Macadam Road, and to the south by residential properties. � }: 7+:»fiY:Lvw . hlY?N :' ' +i E�;u2SJi�t�' e'�. �1:k , 14 2 .' • At the time of our investigation, the site was forested and undeveloped, except for the proposed Lot 8 where an existing house (abandoned) is located, and proposed Lot 7 where an existing garage (abandoned) is located. The southern portion of the property is occupied by a natural drainage gulch and is designated as an open space buffer area. The side slopes of the drainage gulch dip between approximately 18 and 33 degrees (33 to 65 percent grade). The gradient of the stream channel in the drainage .. gulch is approximately 5.6 (18 percent grade). The proposed development will occupy the central, and northern portions of the site. On this portion of the site the slopes vary between 5 and 23 degrees (10 to 43 percent grade) and slopes towards the northeast. Mature deciduous trees and blackberry bushes occupy a majority of the property. GEOLOGIC SETTING The subject site lies within the central Puget Lowland. The lowland is part of a regional north -south trending trough that extends from southwestern British Columbia to near Eugene, Oregon. North of Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092 -01004 Sara Development.doc Olympia, Washington, this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advance /retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded on the west by the Olympic Mountains and on the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and nonglacial sediments consisting of interbedded gravel, sand, silt, till, and peat lenses. The United States Department of Interior USGS Des Moines, Washington Geology Map and the Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinity, Washington indicates that the property is located within the contacts of Kame - Terrace deposits (Late to Middle Pleistocene) and pre - Vashon drift or Transitional Beds (Middle Pleistocene). The Kame - Terrace deposits consist of a complex of poorly to well -sorted and stratified gravel and sand with variable amounts of silt and clay deposited against or close to the glacial ice. The Transitional Beds underlie the Kame - Terrace deposits and consists mostly of massive to thinly bedded clay, silt and fine sand, with peaty sand and gravel occurring in the lower part. These fine sediments were mostly deposited in lake (Glaciolacustrian) environments, and in fluvial systems prior to the advance of the glacier. The Transitional Beds appear firm in outcrops, but due to a high moisture content and jointing in the beds they can become unstable on steep slopes, and numerous landslides have occurred where exposed on bluffs and slopes. FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 3 A field investigation consisting of excavating eight exploratory test pits ranging in depths of approximately 10 to 13 feet below existing site grade, using a Case 580 4X4 backhoe, was performed to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions at the project site. The test pit excavation was performed on January 23, 2001 utilizing Northwest Excavating & Trucking, Inc., as a subcontractor. Due to heavy vegetation and slopes the exploratory test pit locations were dependent on accessibility. The exploratory test pits were placed in or near the footprint of the proposed single family residence locations where possible. Figure 2 shows the approximate locations of the exploratory test pits. The soils encountered were continuously examined and visually classified in accordance with the Unified Classification System. Soil samples were retained for laboratory testing. A more detailed description of the field investigation is presented in Appendix A. Laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples to evaluate their physical characteristics and engineering properties. The laboratory testing program was formulated with emphasis on the evaluation of natural moisture, and gradation of the materials encountered. Details of the laboratory test program and results of the laboratory tests are summarized in Appendix A. This information, along with the field observations, was used to prepare the final exploratory test pit logs in Appendix A. Based on our findings, the subsurface conditions encountered appeared to be typical of those found in the geologic region of the site. Our exploratory test pits revealed that the proposed lots and building sites to be generally underlain by approximately 1 to 2 feet of loose, silty fine sand with variable amounts of gravel, roots, and organics (topsoil). In the exploratory test pits TP -1, TP -2, TP -3, TP-4, TP- 092 -01004 Sara Development.doc ....v„c r ^ -atw ✓a KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 4 5, and TP -6 the above soils are underlain by 2 to 10 feet of loose to dense, fine to medium sand with variable amounts of silt and gravel (Kame - Terrace Deposits). The above soils were encountered in TP- 1, TP -3, and TP-4 to their termination depths. In the exploratory test pits TP -2, TP-4, TP -6, and TP -7 the Kame - Terrace deposits are underlain by approximately 4 to 9 feet of medium dense to dense silt with variable amounts of fine sand to stiff to very stiff lean clay (Transitional Beds) to their termination depths. In exploratory test pit TP -8 the topsoil is underlain by approximately 4 feet of loose, fine to medium sandy silt with variable amounts of gravel, asphalt, brick and floor tile rubble (Fill). The above fill is underlain by approximately 2 feet of loose, fine to medium sandy silt (Relic Topsoil). The relic topsoil is underlain by approximately 6 feet of stiff to very stiff lean clay (Transitional Beds) to TP -8 termination depth. Moisture contents of the sampled soil ranged from approximately 9 percent to 33 percent. For additional information about the soils encountered, please refer to the logs of the borings in Appendix A. SLOPE CHARACTERISTICS The southern portion of the property is occupied by a natural drainage gulch and is designated as an open space buffer area. The side slopes of the drainage gulch dip between approximately 18 and 33 degrees (33 to 65 percent grade). The slopes of the drainage gulch are heavily vegetated, and covered with forest duff limiting the exposure of soil to the creek cut. Besides the recent alluvial deposits (reworked glacial soils) along the creek channel, it appears that the creek channel is cut into the older weathered transitional beds. No apparent soil structures were observed (bedding dips, joints, or other contacts) due to erosion along the creek channel. However, trees along the drainage gulch slopes are tipped down slope, and or have curving trunks indicating soil creep over time. At the time of our visit the slopes appeared to be relatively stable, but recent rotational slide activity was observed along 43r Avenue South, just south of proposed Lot -1. The recent slide scarp extends from approximately the intersection of South 137 Street and 43 Avenue South for approximately 300 feet north. The toe of the slide was not observed due to heavy vegetation along the creek bed, but the slip plane most likely daylights along the creek at the base of the slope. A portion of the slope grades in the drainage gulch exceed 22 degrees (40 percent grade) shallow slides or soil slips involving the upper soil layers typically form on these slopes. They are typically caused by prolong rainfall and commonly produce debris flows. No recent shallow slides were observed, but the geomorphology of the drainage gulch indicates older shallow slide scars that have been overgrown. GROUNDWATER The exploratory test pit locations were checked for the presence of groundwater during and immediately following the excavation operations. Groundwater was encountered in exploratory test pits TP -1, TP -2, TP -3, and TP -6 between 2 and 9 feet below the existing ground surface. It should be recognized that water table elevations might fluctuate with time, being dependent upon seasonal precipitation, irrigation, land use, and climatic conditions, as well as other factors. Therefore, water level Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092 -01004 Sara Developmrnt.doc "/-;.? nw.:.»w!:"C.�L.e+ r4 °'w«y*a;rr�w* ; xr..s..a*uY, ?r: rv:. r !r; , ir4t'Ag 'c'b:NVI IVP44. KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 5 observations at the time of the field investigation may vary from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. SEISMIC CONDITIONS According to the Seismic Zone Map of the United States contained in the 1997 Uniform Building Code, the project site lies within Seismic Risk Zone 3. The soils encountered exploratory test pits were loose to dense. The overall soil profile generally corresponds to seismic soil profiles SD as defined by Tale 16 -J of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Soil profile SD applies to a profile consisting of medium dense to dense soils within the upper 100 feet of the profile. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of our field and laboratory investigations, along with previous geotechnical experience in the project area, the following is a summary of our evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations. After completion of the recommended site preparations, the parcel should be suitable for the proposed developments. General The subject site is designated as a sensitive area, therefore falls under the Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45. Because of the variable topography over the site and the impact of the watercourse on the south portion of the site each proposed lot will be discussed individually below: Lot -1 Located on the south - southwest portion of the site. Lot -1 abuts a Type 2 watercourse according to Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45 in the code it states that a Type 2 watercourse requires a 35- foot -wide buffer on each side of the watercourse. This buffer is shown on the proposed 9 -lot short plat schematic layout, and also on the subject sites topographic map. Lot -1 also falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of slope areas greater than 40 percent, and existing mappable landslide that closed 43r Avenue South, portions of Lot -1 is defined as a Class 4 area. Since portions of the lot can be classified as Class 4 the proposed structure location shown on Lot -1 should in addition to its shown 35 foot offset from the required 35 foot buffer, have an additional set back of 20 feet. This is a total of approximately 90 feet from the creek and the base of the slope. However, it is a common practice for property owners with slopes of this nature to perform long -term observation of the slopes. It is recommended that slope areas be monitored and periodically examined to provide early recognition of slope changes and identify areas of potential concern. In addition it is recommended that the roof runoff, and footing drains from the proposed structure be tightlined into the existing storm drain system. Lot -2 Located on the southern portion of the site. Lot -2 abuts a Type 2 watercourse according to Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45 in the code it states that a Type 2 watercourse requires a 35- foot -wide buffer on each side of the watercourse. This buffer is shown on the proposed 9 -lot short plat schematic layout, and also on the subject sites Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092 -01004 Sara Development.doc topographic map. Lot -2 also falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of slope areas between 20 and 40 percent exist on the central and southeastern portions of Lot -2. Since the lot is underlain by relatively impermeable soils the lot should be classified as Class 3. The proposed structure location shown on Lot -2 should have an additional 20 -foot set back. This is a total of approximately 125 feet from the creek and the base of the slope. However, it is a common practice for property owners with slopes of this nature to perform long -term observation of the slopes. It is recommended that slope areas be monitored and periodically examined to provide early recognition of slope changes and identify areas of potential concern. In addition it is recommended that the roof runoff, and footing drains from the proposed structure be tightlined into the existing storm drain system. Lot -3 Located in the central portion of the site. Lot -3 southeast corner abuts a Type 2 watercourse according to Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45 in the code it states that a Type 2 watercourse requires a 35 -foot -wide buffer on each side of the watercourse. This buffer is shown on the proposed 9 -lot short plat schematic layout, and also on the subject sites topographic map. Lot -3 also falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of slope areas between 20 and 40 percent exist on the central portions of Lot -3. Since the lot is underlain by relatively impermeable soils the lot should be classified as Class 3. The proposed structure location shown on Lot -3 is located near the central portion of an approximately 35 percent slope. It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed structure will not significantly affect the stability of the slope at the site. However, it is a common practice for property owners with slopes of this nature to perform long -term observation of the slopes. It is recommended that slope areas be monitored and periodically examined to provide early recognition of slope changes and identify areas of potential concern. In addition it is recommended that the roof runoff, and footing drains from the proposed structure be tightlined into the existing storm drain system. Lot-4 Located on the west - central portion of the site. Lot-4 falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of slope areas between 20 and 40 percent exist on the central and western portions of Lot-4. Since the lot is underlain by relatively impermeable soils the lot should be classified as Class 3. The proposed structure location shown on Lot-4 is located near the toe of an approximately 30 percent slope. It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed structure will not significantly affect the stability of the slope at the site. However, it is a common practice for property owners with slopes of this nature to perform long -term observation of the slopes. It is recommended that slope areas be monitored and periodically examined to provide early recognition of slope changes and identify areas of potential concern. In addition it is recommended that the roof runoff, and footing drains from the proposed structure be tightlined into the existing storm drain system. Lot -5 Located on the east - central portion of the site. Lot -5 falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of the short plat location. Lot -5 slopes genet...1y to the northeast at 10 percent or Iess. Since the lot slopes at 10 percent or less, in accordance with the Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45, the lot should be classified as Class 1. Lot -6 Located on the east - central portion of the site. Lot -6 falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of the short plat location. Lot -6 slopes generally to the northeast at 8 percent Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 6 092 -01004 Sara Devclopment.doc or less. Since the lot slopes at 8 percent or less, in accordance with the Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45 the lot should be classified as Class 1. Lot -7 Located on the northwestern portion of the site. Lot -7 falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of slope areas between 20 and 40 percent exist on the central and western portions of Lot -7. Since the lot is underlain by relatively permeable soils the lot should be classified as Class 2. The proposed structure location shown on Lot -7 is located near the toe of an approximately 28 percent slope. It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed structure will not significantly affect the stability of the slope at the site. However, it is a common practice for property owners with slopes of this nature to perform long -term observation of the slopes. It is recommended that slope areas be monitored and periodically examined to provide early recognition of slope changes and identify areas of potential concern. In addition it is recommended that the roof runoff, and footing drains from the proposed structure be tightlined into the existing storm drain system. Lot -8 Located on the north portion of the site. Lot -8 falls under areas of potential geologic instability because of the short plat location. Lot -8 slopes generally to the northeast at 20 percent or less. Since the lot slopes at 20 percent or less, in accordance with the Sensitive Area Ordinance Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45 the lot should be classified as Class 1. Lot -9 Located on the north portion of the site. Lot -9 falls under areas of potential geologic instability because the lot slopes between 20 and 40 percent to the northeast. Since the lot is underlain by relatively permeable soils the lot should be classified as Class 2. The proposed structure location shown on Lot -9 is located on the upper portion of an approximately 25 percent slope. It is our opinion that the construction of the proposed structure will not significantly affect the stability of the slope at the site. However, it is a common practice for property owners with slopes of this nature to perform long -term observation of the slopes. It is recommended that slope areas be monitored and periodically examined to provide early recognition of slope changes and identify areas of potential concern. In addition it is recommended that the roof runoff, and footing drains from the proposed structure be tightlined into the existing storm drain system. Erosion and Sediment Control Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 7 Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wet lands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Regulations to control erosion are contained in the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and in other codes and ordinances of the city. Since the southern portion of the subject site is part of an existing watercourse, the ESC will need to be site specific. This may require more conservative Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the control of erosion and entrained sediment. This may include limiting the soil and foundation work to the dry season, and more stringent cover requirements, in order to maintain and protect surface water quality. As a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated in the design of the erosion and sediment control features of the site: 092 -01004 Sara Development.doc 1) Phase the soil, foundation, utility work, and other work requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils during the dry season (generally May through September). 2) All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 8 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. 4) Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. Site Preparation We understand that design of the proposed single family residential development is currently underway; final grades pertaining to the structures are unavailable. General site clearing should include removal of existing pavements, vegetation; trees and associated root systems; wood; existing utilities; structures including foundations, basement walls and floors; rubble; and rubbish. Site stripping should extend to a minimum depth of 12 to 24 inches, or until all organics in excess of 3 percent by volume are removed. Deeper stripping may be required in localized areas due to the presence of loose soils, and fill soils. These materials will not be suitable for use as structural fill. However, stripped topsoil may be stockpiled and reused in landscape or non - structural areas. The exploratory test pits encountered loose soils to a depth of 3 to 6 feet throughout the site. This material should be overexcavated to the level of medium dense soils.. The resulting excavations can be filled with Geotechnical engineer approved on site native soil, or imported structural fill to footing subgrade. This fill material should be within ± 2 percent of optimum moisture, and recompacted to a minimum of 95 percent of maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. In addition, fat clay was encountered in test pit TP-4. Fat clay has a high shrink/swell potential and may cause differential movement of floor slabs and shallow foundations. The fat clay should be removed to a level where a minimum of 2 feet of non - expansive fill (approved native or imported structural fill) can be provided beneath floor slabs and foundation elements During wet weather conditions, typically October through May, subgrade stability problems and grading difficulties may develop due to excess moisture conditions, disturbance sensitive soils and/or the presence of perched groundwater. Construction during the extended wet weather periods could create the need to overexcavate exposed soils if they become disturbed and cannot be recompacted due to elevated moisture content and or weather conditions. If overexcavation is necessary, it should be Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092 -01004 Sara Dcvclopmcnt.doc =ivxi n.:M ,: a •ice^ Yi Mcl confirmed through continuous monitoring and testing by a qualified geotechnical engineer or senior geologist. Soils that have become unstable may require drying and recompaction. Selective drying may be accomplished by scarifying or windrowing surficial material during extended periods of dry warm weather. If the soils cannot be dried back to a workable moisture condition, remedial measures may be required. General project site winterization should consist of placement of aggregate base and protection of exposed soils during the construction phase. Any buried structures encountered during construction should be properly removed and backfilled. Excavations, depressions, or soft and pliant areas extending below planned finish subgrade level should be cleaned to firm undisturbed soil, and backfilled with structural fill. In general, any septic tanks, underground storage tanks, debris pits, cesspools, or similar structures should be entirely removed. Concrete footings should be removed to an equivalent depth of at least 3 feet below proposed footing elevations or as recommended by the Geotechnical engineer. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with structural fill. A representative of our firm should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to test and observe earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral part of our service as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction of the material and the stability of the material. The Geotechnical engineer may reject any material that does not meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations of this report are predicated upon the assumption that earthwork construction will conform to recommendations set forth in this section and the Structural fill section. Groundwater Influence on Structures /Construction Groundwater was encountered in exploratory test pits TP -1, TP -2, TP -3, and TP -6 between 2 and 9 feet below the existing ground surface. The groundwater elevations are most likely caused by hillslope hydrology this is the process of groundwater flowing down gradient to a low point in this case the watercourse on the south portion of the site, and the Duwamish River valley. The Kame - Terrace deposits deposited on the site slopes can be considered to be relatively permeable. The Kame - Terrace deposit sands overlie the relatively impermeable Transitional Beds, resulting in horizontal migration of the groundwater within the overlying permeable soils. The gradient of the groundwater at the site is anticipated to roughly match the topography of the site. The use of a temporary dewatering system should be anticipated during excavation work for the proposed residential structures. Design of temporary dewatering system to remove groundwater should be the responsibility of the contractor. Structural Fill A portion of the existing soils may be suitable for reuse as non - expansive structural fill provided it is relatively free from organic material. We recommend that a representative of Krazan & Associates be on -site during excavation to determine which soils are suitable for structural fill. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 9 092-01004 Sara Developm ent.doc '- ""'.' - °^r— ��tz -•-- - � _ ••- ;m..Tre.mrt'+.,v.'„ °J�.: r�F••...r.erx,.,.rc�'Crra2x Imported structural fill material should consist of well graded gravel or a sand and gravel mixture with a maximum grain size of 1 %2 inches and less than 5 percent fines. All Structural fill material should be submitted for approval to the Geotechnical Engineer at least 48 hours prior to delivery to the site. Fill soils should be placed in lifts approximately 6 to 8 inches thick, moisture- conditioned as necessary, (moisture content of soil shall not vary by more than ±2 percent of optimum moisture) and compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Additional lifts should not be placed if the previous lift did not meet the required dry density or if soil conditions are not stable. Drainage and Landscaping The ground surface should slope away from building pad and pavement areas toward appropriate drop inlets or other surface drainage devices. It is recommended that adjacent exterior grades be sloped a minimum of 2 percent for a minimum distance of 5 feet away from structures. Roof drains should be tightlined away from foundations. Subgrade soils in pavement areas should be sloped a minimum of 1 percent and drainage gradients maintained to carry all surface water to collection facilities and off -site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trenches should be excavated according to accepted engineering practice following OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standards by a contractor experienced in such work. The responsibility for the safety of open trenches should be borne by the contractor. Traffic and vibration adjacent to trench walls should be minimized; cyclic wetting and drying of excavation side slopes should be avoided. Depending upon the location and depth of some utility trenches, groundwater flow into open excavations could be experienced, especially during or shortly following periods of precipitation. Sandy soil conditions were encountered in the upper soils at the site. These cohesionless soils have a tendency to cave in trench wall excavations. Silts and lean clay soils were also encountered at the site. Even though these soils are considered cohesive, due to bedding and joint (fracture) planes in the soil they will also cave in trench wall excavations. Shoring or sloping back trench sidewalls may be required within these soils. All utility trench backfill should consist of structural fill. Utility trench backfill placed in or adjacent to buildings and exterior slabs should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. The upper 2 feet of utility trench backfill placed in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Below 2 feet, utility trench backfill in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Pipe bedding should be in accordance with pipe manufacturer's recommendations. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 10 092.01004 Sara Developmcct.doc `,w'.r;,'7�•�.tS'�9t<'+ �':. nm... ..,..r..w-,. roe.. mewn�rrruw� ....�.'r'anw.�tr;cvY*ryx .. wr- �zz- c-.. �w ...e >- .:xr�:+:yunrir.'!4Fa ^X?YC Floor Slabs and Exterior Flatwork KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 11 The contractor is responsible for removing all water - sensitive soils from the trench regardless of the backfill location and compaction requirements. The contractor should use appropriate equipment and methods to avoid damage to the utilities and/or structures during fill placement and compaction. Since groundwater is anticipated to be at the proposed subgrade elevation, we recommend that concrete slabs -on -grade floors should be underlain by a water vapor retarder system. The water vapor retarder system should be installed in accordance with ASTM Specification E164 -94 and Standard Specifications E1745 -97. According to ASTM Guidelines, the water vapor retarder should consist of a vapor retarder sheeting underlain by a minimum of 4- inches of compacted clean, open - graded coarse rock of 3/4-inch maximum size. The vapor retarded sheeting should be protected from puncture damage with a minimum of 2- inches of sand. The sand should be well moistened prior to placement of the concrete slab. Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Wall/Basement Wall Design Parameters We have developed criteria for design of permanent subgrade walls and other permanent retaining structures. Walls may be designed as a "restrained" retaining wall based on "at- rest" earth pressures, plus any surcharge on top of the wall as described below, if the wall is attached to the building and/or movement is not acceptable. The wall could also be designed based on "active" earth pressure, if the wall is not part of the building and some movement of the retaining wall is acceptable. Acceptable lateral movement could equal at least 0.2 percent of the wall height would be required to use "active" earth pressure values for design. The following table Wall Design Criteria presents the recommended soil related design parameters for retaining walls with level backfill behind the wall. Contact Krazan & Associates, Inc. if an alternate retaining wall system is used. Krazan & Associates, Inc. should also be contacted for alternate recommendations if sloped backfill surfaces are planned. Design of the wall should incorporate an adequate factor -of -safety against both overturning (FS =2.0 and sliding (FS =1.5). iL wmudsw; Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092-01004 Sara Developnxnt.doc aa.T Wall Design Criteria "At- rest" Conditions 65 psf /foot of depth "Active" Conditions 45 psf/foot of depth Passive Earth Pressure on Low Side of Wall Neglect upper 2 feet; then 300 psf /linear foot of depth. Soil- Footing Coefficient of Sliding Friction (allowable) 0.30 • The stated lateral earth pressures do not include the effects of hydrostatic water pressures generated by water accumulation behind the retaining walls; seismic loads; or loads imposed by construction equipment, foundations or roadways. To minimize the lateral earth pressure and prevent buildup of water pressure against the walls, continuous footing drains (with cleanouts) should be provided at the base of the walls. The footing drains should consist of perforated pipe, sloped to drain, with perforations placed down and enveloped by 6 inches of pea gravel in all directions and filter fabric to prevent migrations of fines. The backfill adjacent to and extending a lateral distance behind the walls a minimum of 2 feet should consist of free - draining granular material. All free draining backfill should contain less than 3 percent fines (passing the No. 200 sieve) based upon the fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve with at least 30 percent retained on the U.S. No. 4 sieve. It should be realized that the primary purpose of the free - draining material is reduction of hydrostatic pressure. Some potential for the moisture to contact the back face of the wall may exist, even with treatment, which may require that more extensive waterproofing be specified for walls which require interior moisture sensitive finishes. KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 12 Compaction of the backfill is recommended to achieve a level of compaction to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method Dl557. Soil compactors place transient surcharges on the backfill. Consequently, only light hand operated equipment is recommended within 3 feet of walls so that excessive stress is not imposed on the walls. Foundations The proposed residential structures may be supported on a shallow foundation system bearing on medium dense to dense native soil or structural fill. Continuous wall or column footings may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) dead plus live load. A 1/3 increase in the above values may be used for short duration, wind, and seismic loads. Structural fill placed on bearing native subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092 -01004 Sara Development.doc z Z re 2 0 to o w CO W ill LL. E d = w z � z0 w U • � C) 1- w tu I- � Lt. O Lid ` C.) C° t= _ O ~ Z Exterior footings should have a minimum depth of 18 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, whichever is lower. Interior footings should have a minimum depth of 12 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, which ever is lower. Footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches regardless of load. If constructed as recommended. The total settlement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential settlement, along a 20 -foot exterior wall footing, or between adjoining column footings, should be less than Y2 inch, producing an angular distortion of 0.002. Most settlement is expected to occur during construction, as the loads are applied. However, additional post - construction settlement may occur if the foundation soils are flooded or saturated or if a strong seismic event results in liquefaction of the supporting granular soils. Seasonal rainfall, water run -off, or normal watering practice of trees and landscaping areas around the proposed buildings, should not flood and/or saturate footings. Resistance to lateral footing displacement can be computed using an allowable friction factor of 0.30 acting between the base of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can alternatively be developed using an allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot acting against the appropriate vertical footing faces. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. A 1/3 increase in the above value may be used for short duration, wind, or seismic loads. Testing and Inspection A representative of Krazan & Associates, Inc. should be present at the site during the earthwork activities to confirm that actual subsurface conditions are consistent with the exploratory fieldwork. This activity is an integral part of our services as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction testing and stability of the material. This representative can also verify that the intent of these recommendations is incorporated into the project design and construction. Krazan & Associates, Inc. will not be responsible for grades or staking, since this is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor. LIMITATIONS Geotechnical engineering is' one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to improvements in the field of Geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to excavation or fill placement, new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of the soils report may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. In light of this, the Owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 1fir: Mee+ KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 13 092.01004 Sara Development.doc KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 14 without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that two years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. Foundation and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk is derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the Geotechnical engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this report may not be valid. The Geotechnical engineer should be notified of any changes so the recommendations can be reviewed and reevaluated. This report is a geotechnical engineering investigation with the purpose of evaluating the soil conditions in terms of foundation design. The scope of our services did not include any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater or atmosphere, or the presence of wetlands. Any statements, or absence of statements, in this report or on any boring log regarding odors, unusual or suspicious items, or conditions observed are strictly for descriptive purposed and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential hazardous and/or toxic assessment. The geotechnical information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future geotechnical developments. We emphasize that this report is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not be used for any other site. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092.01004 Sara Dcvclopmcnt doc ...a..�i..c: ^:7 r . ; it$..y..v.i, i.:� td.:b'`•.ia.asSi��:i c'ir ..�:�., tiY.::.•..:y,:,iGf;�isk Sv . .. Yw:i r.. te,rW".«:�x:ra�:v.:��ixu.Y.i+i ".•'. 44a6.ui ,o:,:A . W , Wd .,,.. • If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (425) 485 -5519. CB /TGB: Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOC S, INC. Chris Behrens Senior Engineering Geologist T Timothy G. B erle, P.E. Engineering Manager `EXPIRES: 11 /10 / d 2 I Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092 -01004 February 20, 2001 Page No. 15 092 -01004 Sara Develapment.doc ` �: �: 1��':- �`+' k': �?' d.,•' d±; vt} G7" 4kxFSm; �Krr• 4;.." Aw: rnp,: �- i•!,s^•i0:'s'cY.v:<!t'q,+.o�rl :,c i. t .. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. I I I I Field Investigation APPENDIX A FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS Appendix A Page A.1 The field investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance and a subsurface exploratory program. Eight exploratory test pits were excavated. The exploratory test pit locations are shown on the site plan. Elevations shown on the boring logs were interpolated from topographic information provided by others. The depths are from the existing ground surface at the time the borings were drilled. The soils encountered were logged in the field during the exploration and, with supplementary laboratory test data, are described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil samples were obtained from the exploratory test pit sidewalls or from the bottom of the exploratory test pit. All samples were returned to our Woodinville laboratory for evaluation. Laboratory Investigation The laboratory investigation was programmed to determine the physical and mechanical properties of the foundation soil underlying the site. Test results were used as criteria for determining the engineering suitability of the surface and subsurface materials encountered. In situ moisture contents, sieve analysis tests, and Atterberg Limit test were determined for the samples representative of the subsurface material. These tests, supplemented by visual observation, comprised the basis for our evaluation of the site material. The logs of the exploratory test pits and laboratory determinations are presented in this Appendix. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092.01004 Sara Development.doc z _ ►- ce 6 g 00 N 0 w1.- U) w w 0 g Q = w z t— O w ~ w 2 • p 0 O N 0 w w . l— Z W 0~ z O Catcl re rft ecQ b N � XKE a i NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR IHAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Project: Residential Development Log of Test Pit 1 Project No: 092 -01004 Client: Sara Development Figure: A -1 Location: Tukwila, WA Logged By: ALH Depth to Water 2.0 feet, very heavy flow SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Moisture Content (o) 20 40 60 80 I i I Remarks Depth Ie9wAS I Description Sample Number I (1J) 41daa 0 Ground Surface 5--c: 10 I I I ': • • i ' SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, black . berry roots, loose, wet. / _Masson). ./ WELL GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL (SW) Dark yellowish brown, fine to coarse grained sand, loose to medium dense grading to dense, wet. (Kame- Terrace Deposit) Groundwater flow at 2 feet appears to come from an old stream channel. •, G -1 - 5— G -2 r 10 • - 15— 20— End of Test Pit Massive caving from surface 15— 20— Method: Caterpillar 416C Krazan and Associates 1501 - 15th Street NW Excavation Date: 1/23/01 Contractor: Northwest Excavating Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Sheet: 1 of 1 1 I I I I i Project: 092 -01004 Log of Test Pit 2 Project No: 092 -01004 Client: Residential Development Figure: A -1 Location: Sara Development Logged By: ALH Depth to Water 5.5 feet, light seepage SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Moisture Content (%) 20 40 60 80 Remarks Depth logwS Description Sample Number Depth (ft) 0 Ground Surface 0 _ _ : '• l,` SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, black berry roots, loose, wet. / goasoilL J POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP -SM) I 5— 5 10 - 3 ys • :,- I " , i , Light yellowish brown, fine to medium grained sand, trace gravel, moist. • CVlleathered Kame - Terrace Deposit 7 POORLY GRADED SAND W /SILT AND GRAVEL (SP -SM) Light gray, fine to medium grained sand, loose to medium dense grading to dense, very moist. Tame- Terrace Deposia SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Grayish brown, fine to medium grained sand, occasional cobbles and boulders and decomposed granite stones, very moist. 1---- Glacial till SILT WITH SAND (ML) Light gray, very fine grained sand, moist. (Transitional Beds) G -1 • G -2 G -3 _ 10 • G-4 G -5 S—I 15 20 End of Test Pit 15- 20— Method: Caterpillar 416C Krazan and Associates Excavation Date: 1/23/01 1501 - 15th Street NW Contractor: Northwest Excavating Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Sheet: 1 of 1 II Project: Residential Development Client: Sara Development Location: Tukwila, WA Depth to Water 2.0 feet, light flow Log of Test Pit 3 Project No: 092 - 01004 Figure: A - Logged By: ALH a, a) 0 10 15 20 Ground Surface SUBSURFACE PROFILE SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, loose, wet. sTopsoil) Description SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Grayish brown, fine to medium grained sand, moist to wet (Glacial till -like below 5 feet). (Kame - Terrace Deposit) End of Test Pit SAMPLE L o. a) 0 10— 15— 20 Moisture Content ( %) 20 40 60 80 Remarks Method: Caterpillar 416C Contractor. Northwest Excavating Krazan and Associates 1501 - 15th Street NW Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Excavation Date: 1/23/01 Sheet: 1 of 1 Project: Residential Development Log of Test Pit 4 Project No: 092 -01004 Client: Sara Development Figure: A-4 Location: Tukwila, WA Logged By: ALH Depth to Water Not Observed SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Moisture Content C 20 40 60 80 Remarks yodaa Symbol Description Sample Number (V) 4ldaa Ground Surface 0 SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, loose, wet. QTo2soilL POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP -SM) Yellowish brown, fine to medium grained sand, loose, moist. Tame Terrace Deposit FAT CLAY (CH) Grayish brown, minor fracturing, stiff to very N 9 rY stiff, moist. ransitional Beds) ) z?� •; ,.1.:.;. ` "' 5� / 5— G -1 10 Fa—I 10 15— 20— End of Test Pit • 15- 20 Method: Caterpillar 416C Krazan and Associates Excavation Date: 1/23/01 1501 - 15th Street NW Contractor: Northwest Excavating Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Sheet: 1 of 1 Project: Residential Development Client: Sara Development Location: Tukwila WA Depth to Water Not Observed Log of Test Pit 5 Project No: 092 - 01004 Figure: A - Logged By: ALH .c a a, 10 15— 20— Ground Surface SUBSURFACE PROFILE Description SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, loose, wet. £ropsoi� SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL Yellowish brown, fine to coarse grained sand. Small lenses/layers of silt and clean sand and occasional cobbles, loose to medium dense, moist. (Somewhat glacial till -like in appearance.) (Kame - Terrace Deposit) End of Test Pit SAMPLE m a E z a, 0. E m U, 0. a, 10— 15— 20 Moisture Content ( %) 20 40 60 80 Remarks Method: Caterpillar 416C Contractor: Northwest Excavating Krazan and Associates 1501 - 15th Street NW Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Excavation Date: 1/23/01 Sheet: 1 of 1 Project: Residential Development Client: Sara Development Location: Tukwila WA Depth to Water 9.0 feet very light seepage Log of Test Pit 6 SUBSURFACE PROFILE Description Ground Surface SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained, loose, wet. STopsoi! SILTY SAND (SM) Grayish brown, fine grained sand, loose, moist. jKame- Terrace Deposit) LEAN CLAY (CL) Gray, some fracturing and minor slickensides, very stiff, moist. (Transitional Beds) End of Test Pit SAMPLE 0-1 o. a) 0 0 5— 10— 15— 20 Moisture Content ( %) 20 40 60 80 Remarks • Method: Caterpillar 416C Contractor: Northwest Excavating Krazan and Associates 1501 - 15th Street NW Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Excavation Date: 1/23/01 Sheet: 1 of 1 Project No: 092 - 01004 Figure: A - Logged By: ALH z m Z � 6 UO rn U) W ' al _ F- u) W WO < co a = W Z � H O Z I— W ul U O - 0 I— Ui = I— F. LL O Ii! Z U = 0 l Z Project: Residential Development Log of Test Pit 7 Project No: 092 -01004 Client: Sara Development Figure: A -7 Location: Tukwila, WA Logged By: ALH Depth to Water Not Observed SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Moisture Content ( %) 20 40 60 80 Remarks 4ida0 Io4wAS I Description Sample Number Depth (ft) 0 Ground Surface 0— _ - 10 gI. occasional rA 1 SILTY SAND (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, loose, i wet. STo_psoill SANDY SILT (ML) Grayish brown, fine grained sand, medium dense, moist. £Transitional Beds/ LEAN Gray, stringers CLAY (CL) and lenses/layers of fine sand and drop stone, stiff to very stiff, moist. - - 5— -- — 1 — 10 10 15— 20— End of Test Pit 15- 20-- Method: Caterpillar 416C Krazan and Associates Excavation Date: 1/23/01 1501 - 15th Street NW Contractor: Northwest Excavating Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Sheet: 1 of 1 ;,, '. :;.S:ii__,, �:[;�>a:i'.:.t =Si'' ..,.� �.:�G';.�+is^w= lr::t4x4}s.�' �lal�W`..itSLU'�• T.'9:.�:hlF. {i3..3,'. Project: Residential Development Log of Test Pit 8 Project No: 092 -01004 Client: Sara Development Figure: A -8 Location: Tukwila, WA Logged By: ALH Depth to Water Not Observed SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Moisture Content ( %) 20 40 60 80 I I Remarks Depth 'aquas 1 Description Sample Number Depth (ft) 0 Ground Surface _ 0 illlilli SILTY SAND (SM) Very dark brown, fine to medium grained sand, loose, I wet. Loe oil SANDY SILT (ML) Grayish brown, fine to medium grained sand, concrete and asphalt rubble, broken brick, floor tile, and gravel, soft/loose, moist to very moist. 0111 ./ SANDY SILT Dark brown, fine to medium grained, soft, moist. (Old topsoil) 5 _ 10 15 20 r LEAN CLAY (CL) Grayish brown, stiff to very stiff, moist to wet. (Transitional Beds) , A 10— End of Test Pit 15— 20— Method: Caterpillar 416C Krazan and Associates Excavation Date: 1/23/01 1501 - 15th Street NW Contractor. Northwest Excavating Suite 106 Auburn, Washington 98002 Sheet: 1 of 1 _ .. ..c ± {,. �urc <.ps!s::;e.�l+�';.xa;:�:.: ants:: ��' �:: �a�: i:. u: �, s�52�' �.. .«�urf,�'ri�i�3;i^,.�,:,�+1itii SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC.' PERCENT PASS? (X ■NO) .75 in. .- .4)4a1,11,601a% -Joo0000 A' .LA o tit 00 Uw1—• 00 tA 1/40 ON -.3 opt—. 0 CRS. .625 in. CRS. MEDIUM .5 in. SILT .375 in. CLAY 0.0 . .25 in. 22.6 8.5 #4 46.6 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50 #60 #100 #200 y. COBBLES % GRAVEL % SAND % FINES CRS. FINE CRS. MEDIUM FINE SILT I CLAY 0.0 . 0.0 22.6 8.5 17.8 46.6 4.5 it . . i r J 1 N , i . . . ,, , . . . . . : . . . . . . : i . - 500 100 10 1 01 0.01 0.001 Project: Sara Development Client: Sara Development, Inc. Sample No: 7104(1) Location: TP - G2 100 90 ao ct 70 w Z 60 LL Z 5 w 40 w - 30 20 10 (no specification provided) Particle Size Distribution Report Source of Sample: GRAIN SIZE - mm Project No.: 09201004 Date: 2 -9-01 ElevJDepth: Soil Description Light brown, well graded SAND with gravel PL= D85= 8.97 D30= 0.209 C 7.24 USCS= SW Sample 7104(1) Location: TP -1 G2 F.M.= 2.16 Atterbern Limits LL= Coefficients D60= 0.717 D15= 0.124 C 0.61 Classification AASHTO= Remarks P1= D50= 0.402 D10= 0.0989 Plate A -9 LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT 60 50 •" - - - -- zu 10— 4 PLASTICITY INDEX N W t N 0 4. V 0 _ O O 0 O Dashed line indicates the approximate / / upper limit boundary for natural soils // / / — / / / // O C, — / / / / / — / / / / / — , / / / / 0 G%,. A //. ML cir OL MH or OH ����� *1������� _ 10 30 50 70 90 110 LIQUID UMIT MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL P1 % <#40 %<#200 USCS • Yellowish gray SILT with sand 33 24 9 ML • Project No. 09201004 Client: Sara Development, Inc. Project: Sara Development • Location: TP -2 G5 Remarks: • Sample 7104(2) location: TP -2 G5 LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Plate A-10 LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT 60 ,�,- - • -.. 10 4 _ O V' A N 0 I's T X3aNI JWOI1SV1d Dashed line indicates the approximate limit / / upper boundary for natural soils // / / - / / / / p G1` - // / / / / // / / • / G A ML r OL BAH or OH / AZ171V# 10 30 50 70 90 110 UQUID UMrr MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %c#40 %c#200 USCS • Yellowish gray fat clay 56 27 29 CH Project No. 09201004 ClIent: Sara Development, Inc. Project: Sara Development • Location: TP-4 S1 Remarks: •Sample 7104(3) location: TP-4 S1 Plate A-11 LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1!'Iiypf^,yl�fi`.N z � w 6 00 co CO W J H LL W LL Q co 2 d 1" Z = F- 1- O Z w 0 0 Y a 1- WW I 1- H IL wz — I O Z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. GENERAL APPENDIX B EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS Appendix B Page B.1 When the text of the report conflicts with the general specifications in this appendix, the recommendations in the report have precedence. SCOPE OF WORK: These specifications and applicable plans pertain to and include all earthwork associated with the site rough grading, including but not limited to the furnishing of all labor, tools, and equipment necessary for site clearing and grubbing, stripping, preparation of foundation materials for receiving fill, excavation, processing, placement and compaction of fill and backfill materials to the lines and grades shown on the project grading plans, and disposal of excess materials. PERFORMANCE: The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. This work shall be inspected and tested by a representative of Krazan and Associates, Inc., hereinafter known as the Geotechnical engineer and/or Testing Agency. Attainment of design grades when achieved shall be certified to by the project Civil Engineer. Both the Geotechnical engineer and the Civil Engineer are the Owner's representatives. If the Contractor should fail to meet the technical or design requirements embodied in this document and on the applicable plans, he shall make the necessary readjustments until all work is deemed satisfactory as determined by both the Geotechnical engineer and the Civil Engineer. No deviation from these specifications shall be made except upon written approval of the Geotechnical engineer, Civil Engineer or project Architect. No earthwork shall be performed without the physical presence or approval of the Geotechnical engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Geotechnical engineer at least 2 working days prior to the commencement of any aspect of the site earthwork. The Contractor agrees that he shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and that the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Owner and the Engineers harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, except for liability arising from the sole negligence of the Owner or the Engineers. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: All compacted materials shall be densified to a density not less that 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557, as specified in the technical portion of the Geotechnical Engineer's report. The location and frequency of field density tests shall be as determined by the Geotechnical engineer. The results of these tests and compliance with these specifications shall be the basis upon which the Geotechnical engineer will judge satisfactory completion of work. SOILS AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS: The Contractor is presumed to have visited the site and to have familiarized himself with existing site conditions and the contents of the data presented in the soil report. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 4,47 .Ytlxp 092 -01004 Sara Development.doc Appendix B Page B.2 The Contractor shall make his own interpretation of the data contained in said report, and the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability under the contractor for any loss sustained as a result of any variance between conditions indicated by or deduced from said report and the actual conditions encountered during the progress of the work. DUST CONTROL: The work includes dust control as required for the alleviation or prevention of any dust nuisance on or about the site or the borrow area, or off -site if caused by the Contractor's operation either during the performance of the earthwork or resulting from the conditions in which the Contractor leaves the site. The Contractor shall assume all liability, including Court costs of codefendants, for all claims related to dust or windblown materials attributable to his work. SITE PREPARATION Site preparation shall consist of site clearing and grubbing and the preparations of foundation materials for receiving fill. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: The Contractor shall accept the site in this present condition and shall demolish and/or remove from the area of designated project, earthwork all structures, both surface and subsurface, trees, brush, roots, debris, organic matter, and all other matter determined by the Geotechnical engineer to be deleterious. Such materials shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be removed from the site. Tree root systems in proposed building areas should be removed to a minimum depth of 3 feet and to such an extent which would permit removal of all roots larger than 1 inch. Tree root removed in parking areas may be limited to the upper 1'Y2 feet of the ground surface. Backfill or tree root excavation should not be permitted until all exposed surfaces have been inspected and the Geotechnical engineer is present for the proper control of backfill placement and compaction. Burning in areas, which are to receive fill materials, shall not be permitted. SUBGRADE PREPARATION: Surfaces to receive Structural fill,' building or slab loads shall be prepared as outlined above, scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture- conditioned as necessary, and compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. Loose and/or areas of disturbed soils shall be moisture conditioned and compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. All ruts, hummocks, or other uneven surface features shall be removed by surface grading prior to placement of any fill material. All areas, which are to receive fill materials, shall be approved by the Geotechnical engineer prior to the placement of any of the fill material. EXCAVATION: All excavation shall be accomplished to the tolerance normally defined by the Civil Engineer as shown on the project grading plans. All over excavation below the grades specified shall be backfilled at the Contractor's expense and shall be compacted in accordance with the applicable technical requirements. FILL AND BACKFILL MATERIAL: No material shall be moved or compacted without the presence of the Geotechnical engineer. Material from the required site excavation may be utilized for construction site fills provided the Geotechnical engineer gives prior approval. All materials utilized for Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092-01004 Sara Development.doc r1.11, ,...w1r.N)?eF.t.K ^ !+VCMtt!!Y;!. K, . Appendix B Page B.3 constructing site fills shall be free from vegetation or other deleterious matter as determined by the Geotechnical engineer. PLACEMENT, SPREADING AND COMPACTION: The placement and spreading of approved fill materials and the processing and compaction of approved fill and native materials shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. However, compaction of fill materials by flooding, ponding, or jetting shall not be permitted unless specifically approved by local code, as well as the Geotechnical engineer. Both cut and fill shall be surface compacted to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical engineer prior to final acceptance. SEASONAL LIMITS: No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled while it is frozen or thawing or during unfavorable wet weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until the Geotechnical engineer indicates that the moisture content and density of previously placed fill are as specified. Both cut and fill shall be surface compacted to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical engineer prior to final acceptance. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 092 -01004 Sara Developmcnt.doc 0 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. April 10, 2001. David McPherson City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 thank you, !EXPIRES 11/3/oi 1 RE: Sight Distance Study As per your pre - application comments dated December 9, 1999, I have provided you with a Sight Distance study. I have attached supporting calculations for your review. A photograph of the site is also attached you're your reference. The AASHTO manual version 1990 was used to determine the sight distance. As can be seen from the attached calculation a sight distance of 300 feet was determined to be appropriate. The existing measured sight distance from the proposed driveways is approximately 390 feet looking south and 305 feet looking north, as measured from 10 feet behind the proposed edge of traveled way. However, as a result of this project the north side of this lot will be regraded to street level to allow increased sight distance. The sight distance will then increase to more than 600 feet looking north. The existing measured sight distance at the intersection of 43` Ave. S and Macadam Road are as following: Very poor visibility for vehicles on 43` Ave. S looking south of this intersection due to the berm located on the north side of the lot. However, the visibility is excellent for vehicles on 43` Ave. S looking north of this intersection. As referenced previously, the sight distance calculation according to the AASHTO manual 1990 version will be 300 feet. As a result of this project, the berm on the north side of the lot will be regraded to make significant improvements to the sight distance to the south of the intersection. The sight distance will exceed 350 feet to the north and south of this intersection. If there are any questions that I arise or you need further clarification please don't hesitate to contact me at 425- 931 -6863. Prepared by Mohammad Saleem, EIT Checked by Kok -Wah Tung, PE z ~ w _I 0 00 . U) 0 CO In W I � w w g < = w F- _ z � F=0 z F- w • w 0 • - o F- w I F-� LL 0 w z U= o The 1990 AASHTO Manual was used to perform the calculations. Calculations: Using Case IIIB- Turning Left into a Major Highway (this case exceeds Case IIIC- turning right into a Major Highway) Design speed = posted speed + 5mph = 25 mph + 5 mph = 30 mph 85% of design speed = 0.85 X 30 mph = 25.5 mph (see figure IX -36 p.756) P = Distance traveled by vehicle A, from point 3 to point 6 P = (from fig. IX -34) + (vehicle length) + (lane width) + (setback distance from edge of traveled way) P = 135 feet + 20 feet + 11 feet + 10 feet = 176 feet From table IX -7 p.764 determine to = 8.3 sec(from interpolation) J + to = 2 sec + 8.3 sec = 10.3 sec Q = (J +ta)x 1.47x(85% of 30 mph) Q = 10.3 sec x 1.47 x 25.5 mph = 386 feet h = P – 16 – (1.9 x 85% of 30 mph) -20 h= 176 -16- 48.45 -20 =91.55 feet Sight distance = Q - h = 386 feet – 91.55 feet = 294.45 feet --> 300 feet Comparing this result to Figure IX -40 p. 762 yields consistant results. Therefore, a sight distance of 300 feet will meet 1990 AASHTO requirements. z ;- t QQ r J U 0 0 CO CO ILI J = w • 0 u_Q a • W Z = 1- 0 Z I– w 2 o. 0 0 - O 1– W W : I I - v_ z Cu' 0- O 1- z rt p...n r.n.-1. u.ih ,r.IM.A Af1',,.. Z ~ W W JU 00 j 0 J = H W ix l. Q = C1 � Z I- O Z 1— WW O • S O H W 2 I— H O w Z F. _ O ~ Z MEMO .•M.■ 50/ ��� 60 I o II '�� ' Q - I Ed. ACCELERATION OF PASSENGER CARS LEVEL CONDITIONS - DEVELOPED FROM REF. 16) S 0 < ,.CI 40 all / l N.P. t ice rr P \ � \ � O • ACCELERATION OF TRUCKS LEVEL CONDITIONS (SOURCE - REF. I) 300 LB. /HP. J • I JJ / I MEMO .•M.■ 50/ ��� 60 AT /III IS%NEW! / 4, o 4 O_ra - '�� ' Q - Ed. ACCELERATION OF PASSENGER CARS LEVEL CONDITIONS - DEVELOPED FROM REF. 16) < ,.CI (SOURCE t rr • I I so mjM 25.5 61P At -Grade Intersections 70 60 50 40 30 2 10 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 PASSENGER CARS - DISTANCE TRAVELED - FEET TRUCKS - DISTANCE TRAVELED - FEET Figure IX -34. Acceleration curves. 749 2400 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 ;:ur ; fr;;; r ,',a;r. > .Yti«+vr tzi6G�sl•,`.,..� 754 AASHTO— Geometric Design of Highways and Streets At -Grade Intersections 755 The Case IIIA distances required for highways of high design speed (espe- cially the multilane type) are large, and the average driver's keenness of per- ception may be inadequate for proper use of such distances. Drivers may be able to cross the openings in the through- traffic stream that are less than the Case IIIA distances. To cross such openings, either the crossing driver must accelerate at a higher rate or the through driver must be traveling at a lower speed or must slow down to permit the crossing. Because these operations may be hazardous, it is desirable to use the indicated Case IIIA sight distance for the control -type vehicle. Case IIIB — Turning Left into a Major Highway Figures IX -35 and IX -36, Case IIIB, illustrate a P vehicle entering a cross road from a stopped position by clearing vehicles approaching from the left and then by turning left and entering the traffic stream approaching from the right. For a vehicle to safely complete this maneuver it is necessary for the driver to have sufficient sight distance to the left to cross the near lane(s) without interfering with oncoming traffic in this lane. The stopped vehicle must also have sufficient sight distance to the right to allow the operator of the vehicle to turn left and accelerate to a speed where he does not significantly interfere with the vehicles coming from the right. The sight distance to the left may be calculated from the equation. d = 1.47 V (J + ta) _ ), 4'-1 (:: 5Y:2 "' ) ;' 5.5 -/i where d = sight distance to the left along the major highway from the intersection, ft, V = design speed on the major highway, mph; J = 2 sec. to = time required to accelerate and traverse the distance to clear the traffic in the lane approaching from the left. This dis- tance is the sum of the ten foot setback to the stop line, the length of the vehicle, and the distance travelled to cross the opposing lane(s) (approximately 1.5 X lane width). The necessary sight distance to the right to make a left turn from a stop sign is calculated making the assumption that the mainline vehicle will slow down to a speed 85 percent of the design speed and will always be at least 1.9 X speed in feet away from the turning vehicle. Figure IX -36 should be referred to when calculating the necessary sight distance to the right on a two lane highway with no median. To calculate the necessary sight distance first determine from Figure IX -34 the distance required for the turning vehicle to reach a speed of 85 percent of the mainline design speed —this is P Next determine the time required to travel this dis- tance from Table IX -7. To this time, add J (2 sec.). Multiply this time by 1.47 x (85 percent of the mainline design speed). This will give Q; see Figure IX -36. The letter h is equal to P -16- (1.9 x 85 percent of the mainline design speed) - vehicle length. Subtracting h from Q gives the necessary stopping sight distance. In the case of undivided highways or divided highways with narrow medi- ans (the median width is less than the length of the design vehicle), both clear- ances are performed simultaneously as one operation. For divided highways with wide medians (the median is wider than the length of the design vehicle), the maneuvers are performed as two operations. The stopped vehicle must first have a proper sight distance to depart from a stopped position and cross traffic approaching from the left. The crossing vehicle may then stop and store in the median prior to performing the second operation. This operation requires the necessary sight distance for vehicles approaching on the right to allow the crossing vehicle to depart from the median, to turn left into the cross road and to accelerate without being overtaken by vehicles approaching from the right. As is shown in Figure IX -37 Case IIIB multilane, adding additional lanes or a median results in the accelerating left turning vehicle achieving average running speed closer to the intersection. The distance that n and h are decreased by is the width of the extra lanes from the left plus the width of the median. The necessary sight distance is therefore decreased by the same dis- tance. This distance is minor when compared with the required sight distance, especially at higher speeds. In the case of undivided highways or divided highways with narrow medians (median width less than the length of the design vehicle), the driver of the entering vehicle will check for adequate sight distance for vehicles approaching from both the left and right before entering the major highway in one maneuver. For divided highways with wide medians (median wider than the length of the design vehicle), the maneuver is performed as two- operations. The stopped vehicle must first have proper sight distance to depart from a stopped position and cross traffic approaching from the left. The crossing vehicle may then stop and store in the median prior to performing the second operation. This operation requires the necessary sight distance for vehicles approaching from the right to allow the crossing vehicle to depart for the median, turn left into the major highway and then accelerate without being overtaken by main- line vehicles approaching from the right. Figure IX -40 contains data for a P design vehicle turning left into a cross highway. Curve B -1 indicates the sight distances required for the turning vitUvti 047 O 1 1 /. - r ^I j . _z,S 0 -® © -® 0-0 A P I ? 2 5 i V.G Q Vsh9 VEHICLE A 03 0 40. DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE A IN COMPLETING THE LEFT TURN. TTR/2 =44' © —© DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE A IN ACCELERATING TO SPEED Va VEHICLE B 01 POSITION OF VEHICLE B TRAVELING AT DESIGN SPEED 2 SECONDS BEFORE VEHICLE A STARTS HIS DEPARTURE MOVEMENT. DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE B WHILE REDUCING TO SPEED Va AND BY NOT ENCROACHING CLOSER THAN V.G. TO V CLE A WHEN VEHICLE A HAS REACHED POINT (6 Figure IX -36. Case IIIB, stopped vehicle turning left onto two -lane major highway. VEHICLE A n = P -I6' = P- 16 -T.G -L R =28 POSITION OF STOPPED VEHICLE A DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE A IN COMPLETING THE LEFT TURN.ITR /2 +32 =76' DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE A IN ACCELERATING TO SPEED Va VEHICLE B POSITION OF VEHICLE B TRAVELING AT DESIGN SPEED 2 SECONDS BEFORE VEHICLE A STARTS HIS DEPARTURE MOVEMENT. DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE 0 WHILE REDUCING TO SPEED Va AND BY NOT ENCROACHING CLOSER THAN VG TO VEy1ELE A WHEN VEHICLE A HAS REACHED POINT 6 0 12' I i U VELOCITY OF VEH. A at ®= 0 VELOCITY OF VEH. B at() D.S. VELOCITY OF VEH. A at ©= Va VELOCITY OF VEH. B at 0= Va VEHICLE A AND B ARE 19' IN LENGTH LEVEL CONDITIONS V.G. = VEHICLE GAP DISTANCE BETWEEN VEHICLES A AND B AT 2 X AND X VEHICLE SPEED MPH Sd = SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIRED FOR VEHICLE A TO DEPART FROM A STOP POSITION, COMPLETE A LEFT TURN AND ACCELERATE TO SPEED Va WITHOUT BAING OVERTAKEN BY VEHICLE B TRAVELING AT DESIGN SPEED AND REDUCING TO SPEED Va. P = DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE A, OR TO 0 = DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE B, OR IOTO05 0 = Sd + h Sd = 0 -h VELOCITY OF VEH. A at 03 = 0 VELOCITY OF VEH. A at ©= Va VEHICLE A AND B ARE 19' IN LENGTH LEVEL CONDITIONS V.C. Sd P 0 0 Sd Sd VELOCITY OF VEH. B at() D.S. VELOCITY OF VEH. B at 0 = Va = VEHICLE GAP DISTANCE BETWEEN VEHICLES A AND 8 AT POINTS ©AND % RESPECTIVELY. 2 SEC. X 1.47 X (VEHICLE SPEED MPH) = SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIRED FOR VEHICLE A TO DEPART FROM A STOP POSITION, COMPLETE A LEFT TURN AND ACCELERATE TO SPEED Va WITHOUT BEING OVERTAKEN BY VEHICLE B TRAVELING AT DESIGN SPEED AND REDUCING TO SPEED Va. = DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE A, OR 0 TO © = DISTANCE TRAVELED BY VEHICLE B, OR0f005 = Sd + h = 0 -h Figure IX -37. Case IIIB, stopped vehicle turning left onto multilane highway. Z ~ W cc 0 0 co CI W = J u- W O < 2 �.W co D Z = F- O Z I— W W :a ca O - 0 H- WW H 0 . O .. W U O I— Z £j k 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 0 I 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 SIGHT DISTANCE (FEET) A- SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE CROSSING 2 -LANE HIGHWAY FROM STOP. (SEE DIAGRAM) B -)- SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TURNING LEFT INTO 2-LANE HIGHWAY ACCROSS P VEHICLE APPROACHING FROM LEFT. (SEE DIAGRAM) Figure IX -41. Sight distance at intersections, effect of skew. B- I-4Lane +medlan SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TURNING LEFT INTO 4 -LANE HIGHWAY ACCROSS P VEHICLE APPROACHING FROM LEFT. (SEE DIAGRAM) B -2b- SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TO TURN LEFT INTO 2 -LANE HIGHWAY AND ATTAIN 85% OF DESIGN SPEED WITHOUT. BEING OVERTAKEN BY A VEHICLE APPROACHING FROM THE RIGHT REDUCING SPEED FROM DESIGN SPEED TO 85X OF DESIGN SPEED. (SEE DIAGRAM) Cb- SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TO TURN RIGHT INTO 2 -LANE HIGHWAY AND ATTAIN 85% OF DESIGN SPEED WITHOUT BEING OVERTAKEN BY A VEHICLE APPROACHING FROM THE LEFT AND REDUCING FROM DESIGN SPEED TO 85Y OF DESIGN SPEED. Figure IX -40. Intersection sight distance at at -grade intersection (Case IIIB and Case IIIC). z Q• W 6 00 OD ❑ to W J H U) WO J Ll j OD :3 = W z I- O z 1— W W .0 O � ❑ I— W W. Si' z = F- 0 z 764 AASHTO— Geometric Design of Highways and Streets For an obtuse -angle quadrant the angle between the sight lane A -B and the path of either vehicle is small, and vehicle operators can look across the full sight triangle area with but a little side glance from the vehicle path. For an acute -angle quadrant, sight line B -C, operators are required to turn their heads considerably to see across the whole of the sight triangle area. The dif- ficulty of looking for approaching traffic makes it undesirable to treat the intersection under the assumptions of Case I, even where traffic on both roads is light. Treatment by Case 11 or Case III, whichever is larger, should be used at oblique -angle intersections. In Case III the S distance is larger for oblique -angle than for right -angle intersections. The pavement width on the path of the crossing vehicle, W, is the actual pavement width divided by the side of the intersection angle. The d distance along the highway in such a case cannot be read directly from Figure IX -39, but can be computed by the equation d = 1.47V (J + t by reading t directly from Figure IX -33. Table IX -7 shows the values for acceleration rates for passenger vehicles. Speed (MPH) 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Distance (FT) 50 90 140 , Ito a 215 305 420 570 760 1000 1315 1735 2320 Table IX -7. Acceleration rates for passenger vehicles. T (Sec.) 4.5 6.1 7.3 9.4 11.3 13.5 15.9 18.6 21.7 25.4 30.0 35.9 c for or, i t At -Grade Intersections 765 Effect of Vertical Profiles The evaluation of sight distance at intersections in Case II is based on the safe stopping distance of a vehicle traveling at a stated speed on level high- ways. One or more of the roads approaching the intersection may not be level. A vehicle descending a grade requires a somewhat greater distance to stop than does one on a level grade; also, a vehicle ascending a grade requires less distance in which to stop. The differences in stopping distances on various grades at intersections are the same as those given in Chapter III. The differences indicate that grades up to 3 percent have little effect on stopping sight distances. Grades on an intersection leg should be limited to 3 percent unless the sight distances are greater than the lower limits or stopping on a level grade, in which case the grades should not be greater than 6 percent. In the Case III derivation, the time required to cross the major highway is materially affected by the grade of crossing on the minor road. Normally, the grade across an intersection is so small that it need not be considered, but when curvature on the major road requires the use of superelevation, the grade across it may be significant, in which case the sight distance along the major road should be increased. The effect of grade on acceleration can be expressed as a multiplicand to be used with the time, t , as determined for level conditions for a given dis- tance. The approximate ratios of the accelerating time on the grade to that on the level, for the likely range of crossing distances, are given in Table IX -8. Ratio, accelerating time on grade to accelerating time on level section Design Vehicle —4 —2 0 +2 +4 P SU WB -50 0.7 0.8 0.8 Table IX -8. Effect of gradient on accelerating time at Intersec- tions. Crossroad Grade (percent) 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.7 Z W ft 2 JU 00 U) J = H u.- W Q = • a W Z = 1- 0 W U � O 52 I- W W I E— LL O ij Z W • ( ▪ H O Z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -SS Planner: J r.c,_ G7 r J File Number: U / — v 3 3 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: . U 7 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: r CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431-3665„,:._ E - mail: tukplan n.ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: AO SHORT PLAT (P -SS) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. /3 1 // 9 1Y) / (9,4- (1x i,i ( I DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 6,x &. // 2 /A C t i4 if ki Address: P D. )3 O k Fur Lt 1 98 D 6 Phone: c3 - 8 0-- FAX: , S 3 - BSc 7Z I Z Quarter: Section: ) 5 Township: a Range: o4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Signature: 2 ,- G:b APPHANU.ANDUSEAPP \SHTPLTPT.DOC, 06/15/00 Date: 4 ?— — I STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. lam the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at AS 1 / / 9 /11 AC' J4-� F�-M /�o 14 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. S. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion, cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. EXECUTED at /� e E _ i q (Signature) ' t On this day personally appeared before me 7P 1l� 1D r' A U H D C `� to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSC#d$ED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS o\ k e LLE I A pq 0 /, � lr� :�g51UH rk, . s �. �9 •. O ''gr. . i • ° NGTAti y C n +O+O — / /0. 0 IWAS • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Coimmurity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(Lci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss (city), (state), on , 20 430124.1 0 14-4u s e V (Print Name) P• 0 • (o)c: Cr 41 I; LE AN- t.J /I 9906c' (Address) g—C (Phone Number) 5 44 ' DAY OF q-e,cfee.e-eee NOTARY PUBS IQ aqd for the S(atAof residing at �( !V7 (iU/ 1 My Commission expires on P IG. 20 0/ hington II- 09 - 04 � Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning Information Waived PbWk /Ping Office Use Only Comments & Conditions. APPLICATION FORMS: 1. Application Checklist four (4) copies, indicating items submitted with application. L4. Short Plat Complete Application Packet: four (4) copies of the application form and full size plans and one (1) set of High Quality Photo Reductions of all . plans reduced to 81/2 " x 11". (See Site Plans). IX. Short Plat Fee $200. ✓4. _SEPA Environmental Checklist eight (8) copies and -- Fee ($325). REQUIRED FOR SHORT PLATS OF 5 -9 LOTS. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: (5 — 9 Lot Short Plats Only) SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS ONLY FOR SHORT PLAT OF 5 TO 9 LOTS OR IF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED. L — King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS ONLY FOR SHORT PLAT OF 5 TO 9 LOTS OR IF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED. L Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included) (see Public Notice Materials Section). SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS ONLY FOR SHORT PLAT OF 5 TO 9 LOTS OR IF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED. 7. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Materials Section). SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS ONLY FOR SHORT PLAT OF 5 TO 9 LOTS OR IF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED. PROPERTY INFORMATION: 8. Vicinity Map with site location. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted in a later timely manner for use at the public hearing (e.g., revised colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE G:WPPIIAN\LANDUSE .APP \SIITPLTPT.DOC, 06/15/00 z a = z ~ w re 2 J U U co 0 W = �- � w 2 u_ ¢ = • d • w Z = Z W w 0 O N • l- w w I F- H L O El Z U= 0 z .information. Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning Information Waived PbWk / Ping Office Use. Only Comments & Conditions. 9. Title Report- -dated within 30 days of application filing which clearly establishes status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and ecumbrances. 10. Lot lines for 300 ft. from the sites property lines including right -of -ways. SITEE PLANS -- A.1-4-One set of all plans and analyses shall be stamped by a licensed professional surveyor or engineer, as would normally be required in a building permit application, and have an original signature. Additional copies of the signed set may be submittd to satisfy the total number of copies required. evisions shall satisfy this criteria. A A boundary and topographic survey (2 ft. contours including a minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line) with all above easements, encumbrances and right - of -way width /infrastructure. Elevations shall be City of Tukwila datum (NGV 1929 datum for 100 year flood elevation with equation to City of Tukwila datum). This shall be stamped by the surveyor, and include a surveyor's certificate (sample /attached). 1,,13. Location of all sensitive areas (e.g., streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites.). Provide sensitive area studies as needed per TMC 18.45. Also show trees over 4" caliper in sensitive area or buffers, indicating those to be saved. All proposed sensitive area and tree protection measures shall be shown. -ft 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. U. Existing property lines to remain and proposed lot lines shall be shown as solid lines. New lines shall be called out. Lines to be removed shall be dashed and called out. 16. Building footprint with changes in elevation, site improvements with sufficient dimensions to be accurately described and located (driveways, firelanes, parking layout, rockeries /retaining walls, fences). 41-7-: Fire access lanes and turn- arounds to be per Fire Department standards. N1A G 4\PPHAN\LANDUSE .APP \SHTPLTPT.DOC, 06/15/00 Z }�- Z Ce w aa JO O 0 CO III W _ F- U) U_ W 2 L a d . Z1.- i- O Z 1- W • 0 0 O - O l- W I E- T - U. O W 0 O ~ Z Sri 4, arse j rY �k< 6 - rams .Jnformation Required: May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works. and Planning Information Waived. PbWk/ Ping Office Use Only Comments & Conditions. 18. For sewer and water (domestic and fire): Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street. Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g., site line size, location, and size of public main. No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed). Document sewer and water availability if provided by other than the City of Tukwila. 20. Storm drainage: -- Proposed schematic design for all conveyance systems, water quality features and detention structures per TMC 16.54.060(D) (e.g., detention ponds /vaults, frop -T elbows, coalescing plate separators, and bio- swales). 21. Storm drainage -- Include a Level One downstream analysis per TMC 15.54.060(D), and a narrative discussion of consistency with the King County Surface Water Drainage Manual's Core and Special Requirements. 22. Fire hydrant: -- Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants (adequate fire flow demonstrated in the "water availability" documentation). Schematic road design. 124 King County Health Dept. approval if using septic systems (Min. lot size = 15,000 s.f.). 25. Lot Sizes (e.g., 6,500 sf for LDR) and average width of each proposed lot (min 50 ft.). 26. For Short Plats of 5 to 9 lots, a landscape plan which includes at least one tree in the front yard of each lot & which meets Public Works standards per TMC 17.20.030(G). 27. For stream frontages: existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). 61.247 `' My okJ n14 G. N APPHAMLANDUSE.APPISHTPLTPT.DOC, 06/15/00 - Information Required. , . Response Office Use Only Comments & Conditions. Total existing lots prior to Short Plat. Total lots in this Short Plat. Total acres involved in the Short Plat. Constraints (sensitive area, right retention/detention areas) in acres or sf. of way, Any preexistiong uses? Overall density (lots/acre). GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REQUIRED INFORMATION G \APPFIAN\LANDUSE.APP StITPLTPT.DOC, 06/15/00 : j z z 0 0 co LL1 I CO U. 0. 1 0 g :3 u_ co - a uj Z l-0 Z 0 0) 0 I- LuT) 1 LI- 0 , z w 0 0 OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS DEPOSIT s-- 70 - U Test Report AIR 1=1 WATER El SIDE SEWER PERMIT VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT 14816 Military Road S. • Seattle, Washington Roof, Downspouts, Building Footing Drains, any Ground Water Drains, etc., are not allowed to be hooked into the sewer under this permit. ALL PLUMBING OUTLETS WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE SEWER. This permit is granted subject to the conditions set forth on the District's Application For Permit and is subject to all stipulations of the District's Side Sewer Resolution as amended and which are by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full. i:'UR'Y.Y PERMIT 5222 Li 1 EASEMENT No. RECEIPT No. DATE 'I3Ioi OWNER Chat-( d r`j CONTRACTOR HOUSE ADDRESS 1 3'-I I q mac.. ckCiQm rid NAME SUB - DIVISION LOT No. BLK. No. d BASEMENT: YES NO Permit has been granted Expiration Date Approved by Permits not valid unless signed by istrict representative. Inspector's Report 7)4 — /5/A 4 m � PLvt e T Inspector "CAUTION" NO BUILDING ON SEWER EASEMENTS • DEWATER DITCH BEFORE INSPECTION • DISTRICT INSPECTION BEFORE BACKFILL • TEST SIDE SEWER BEFORE AND DURING INSPECTION • CALL FOR INSPECTION AT 242-3236 SEPTIC TANK The King County Health Department Uniform Plumbing Code requires septic tanks to be completely pumped and filled with earth, sand, gravel, concrete or other approved material. SAFETY The Contractor shall comply with the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (RAW 49.17) and Safety and Health Standards such as Safety Standards for Construction Work (Chapter 296 -155 WAC), General Safety and Health Standards (Chapter 296 -24 WAC), General Occupational Health Standards (Chapter 296 -22 WAC) and any other appropriate safety and health codes. r!�gsgn• eE� Part A: (To Be Completed by Applicant) Purpose of Certificate: ❑ Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Other Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone Proposed Use: Tr Residential Single Family ❑ Residential Multi- Family ❑ Commercial ❑ Other Applicants Name: Sil�A l�c?,� ,e r, t Phone: 2_5 3 .. (,/5(i _ 1 sq i Property Address l ddreesss or Approximate Location: n: - r 2 U, 3 - $ 5 2 '7 i a Legal Description(Attach Map and Legal Description if necessary): .— rc . L Lo T • alt 5:20 - -o i.c:;O ..Ve „- ,-„ GCN �1- - Tit Part B: (To Be Completed by Sewer Agency) 1. lu a. Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing 6 size sewer t ,last -tre .the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR ❑ b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and /or ❑ (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and /or ❑ (3) other (describe): 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) ❑ a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan, OR b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the District, OR ❑ b. Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: AC — re> B E De: TERM id ED Lerr,E a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: GFC: $ SFC: $ UNIT: $ TOTAL: $ (Subject to Change on January 1st) King County/METRO Capacity Charge: Currently, $1090 /residential equivalent, will be billed directly by King County after connection to the sewer system. (Subject to change by King Co/Metro without notice.) b. Easements: ❑ Required ❑ May be Required c. Other: . "WORKING TOWARD A BETTki: ENVIRONMENT? CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY /NON- AVAILABILITY (7Certificate of Sewer Availability I hereby certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. By inSp Title 14816 Military Road South P.O. Box 69550 Tukwila, WA 98168 Phone: (206) 242 -3236 Fax: (206) 242 - 1527 OR ❑ Certificate of Sewer Non - Availability 4. 12 -o! Date MN S. 134th ST. m 10" 134£9 ,3405 13111 1343S /3507 13531 I330B 0 0 /NJ /OE PROP / 0.0/5 M-I5 MH 44-16 9920 492, 450B MY /.r •/4 S1/2 NE 15 -23 -4 STUB LOCATIONS 4380. AVENUE SOUTH ADDRESS, LENGTH DEP1H ST.TIOU 13305 19.0 10.0 0.75 4319 20.0 4.5 , 0.91 .13308 6.0 9.0 2•o3 4319 20.0 0.64.5 13308 5.0 8.0 1.92 4319 20.0 4.5 1.36 13311 27,0 5.0 I.54.6 4343 42.0 3.5 2.00 13319 27.0 5.0 1.54.6 4357 18.0 3.5 0.90.8 13405 31.0 5.5 1.75.6 4420 7.0 3.0 2.15 13407 18.0 5.0 0.41 4425 23.0 3.5 1.51.7 13411 31.0 12.0 0.30 4426 58.0 3.5 2.08 13425 30.0 12.0 0.94 4521 7.0 5.0 0.25 13429 30,5 10.0 1.73 4526 31.0 4.0 0.20 13435 31.0 11.5 0.31 4534 6.0 3.0 0.19 13507 30.0 11.5 0.4.4 4552 7.0 5.0 1.55 13517 31.0 7.5 1.78 tot 2 10.0 3.0 0.77 13531 24.0 7.5 2.55 Lot 8 10.0 4.0 0.53 AJAR. INUSI 13.5 5.5 1.37 STUB LOCATIONS SOUTH 135TH. STREET Z c4 2 6 J U O 0 u) 0 W • =. W • 0 J 1L Q c = a W Z = H O ZI- W D 0 O co 0- O 1- W w I I - F U- -- lJ O Z 111 0 P. I- O z PART A: (To be completed by applicant) Site Address (Attach map. and Legal Description showing hydrant location and size of main): .-/- /3 Lii q M At-C1) 4 ,i LS 1(011-k . - 0,044.1iIiit0iiiitkii0.0tai : : P': Ntd$01 Name: C.: o c f p A l u F,1 7- Name: 1.5 eIN 2- P Address: ?. 0 . R n x, ,f,s 2 1- 4 kE-N9 * AgentriPhone cooco-c944a -15141 t By Date Phone: ,S - 5? ,cb-- I ?, c i I Phone: g / ?, / This certificate is for the purposes of: El Residential Building Permit X Preliminary Plat El Short Subdivision El CommerciaVIndustrial Building Permit El Rezone Et Other Estimated number of service connections and meter size(s): Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure ft. Area is served by (Water utility district): 4.:. C Owner/Agent Signature: ,(419.r Date: PART B: (To be completed by water utility district) The proposed project is located within 7CTII-(4) ICC L. (City/County) The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connectiQn: r ock 144.(A 5 + App 1 4).- A b<yet. kr' ..s. k -Hz rtc- it, A Ca l ) 1.4.A ,_ "I „' e.--,c 2- $73 - ' 2...1 - 2- i' A4 I. 14,, 0 4-c, Use separate sheet if more room is needed) Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of (/) gpm at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of j 2 fps as documented by the ac attached calculations. 4 I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. Kir NOt eVASIAkk LOat 0 (\-.* Gs itt-4.4.A.) 14,,6 II-- iej —0/ * AgentriPhone cooco-c944a -15141 t By Date CITY OF JKWILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA ,98188 H-111a Telephone: (206) 431-3670 Certificate of Water Availability PROJECT #: (Required only if outside City of Tukwila water utility district) PART C: (To be completed by governing jurisdiction) Water Availability: in Acceptable service can be provided to this project El Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in item C2 are met. El System isn't capable of providing service to this project. Minimum water system improvements: (At least equal to B2 above) (Use separate sheet if more room is needed) Agency/Phone By Date WTRAVAILPP z < = z Ui re 2 0 0 u) W W w 0 7- < D. a 11 ±I Z 0 Z D • c O (0 O - O I- W w I L I' 0 . Z LI.J 0 I= II 0 , :!' C2ty 9 '` " Tukwil a T:' ss. . • SHOR PLAT N L01 -033 City of Tukwila Approvals: LEGAL DESCRIPTION :: RECORDING NO. 1 o Y c R 1 7- q O 1••T is 3 VOL./PAGE / f o 7 1 I. r 10 / JZD - 0 f 50 • TALLDE- 042 -ZGI THAT PORTION Or TRACT 19. FOSTORIA CARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT M T RECORDED VOLUME 9 OF PIATS PACF(S) 95. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LWNC EASTERLY OF F.J. FOWL - NON& ROAD (43RD AVENUE SOWN. AS COM:AWED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CA USE NO. 2 416 76). CITY TREASURER CERTIFICATE PORTION OF Sli o f N.E. 4 - 15 29N 4T. /4 , S._ T._ R._ W.M. Them a no delinquent special , • and ail special nm al osseents Them ny o n _ n/ the properly tha h dedicated as .!rest.. alleys or for other p el ore paid in full. E .amine p app.ed by he ,ty of Tahwila Qns, Department n i ' n Oy ' d ' DECL RATION BASIS OF BEARINGS: thh 1 d of • i • mane Director ME BASIS OF BEARINGS MR THIS MAP is PER PLAT or TasTERwEW ESTATES. toL 194. PG. 64. (mILiTY EASEMENTS PROVISIONS: DETWEOI T H L 71V0 route MONS. ALONG THE CENTERLINE ` KNOtY,`AIL PEOPLE BI pRESEN7S I( wg..pir UNDERSIGNED, 000nsrs) W FEE ,9MPLE or ME LAND N DESCRIBED. DO HEREBY • „MAKE A SHORT SUBOMSIQH THEREOF H)75LLWT ro RCW 56.17.060 AND " ACLNONIEDBE ]TNT SVD:SUBOMSION SHALL NOT BE FURTHER DMDED IN ANY MANNER ANHIN A•PERIOD OFSNE •1FIi5, FROM DATE v. RECORD. WITHOUT 7146 - FILING Oi' FINAL PUT. A FL TII£ L IDERS/GNED FLRTIIER 5481. T SUBDMSGN AND 04£ SAME 15 MOs PAW ME FREE • ••`•CONSENT AND W :ACCORBWLS WITH THE Of-VRE OF 7N£ONNEN(5): ' P nlr._ KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRA FN!$,•�)il4T WE. 1NE UNDERSIGNED. ONNOR(S) IMJEC SIMPLE7AND UM HDLDER(S) OF•$HC LAND HOREDY D£cLAgn7Tns aver PLAT TO DrnlE cRAPIt'c REPRESENTATION OF "`, PuTIEA HEREBY. DECLARE ilUKw1N FUR DIE 1.6E: or ins PUBLIC FOREL£(L'ALL A DOK0/1E•JVIO coma' ro WE CITY Oc rs, STOYpI' '' ORMNAGE SYSIDUS LOCATED ON EASEMENTS, TRACTS D : RIGHTS -OF -WAY SHOWN HEREON AND THE BST. THEREOF FOR AL'C ' PUBLIC PURPOSES NOT IICOHS157ENC.y7T7gS USE'iGERET UIX PUBLIC ROADWAY AND LNNTY PURPOSTS.EL5 INC BIGHT TO O MAK NECE554RY SLOPES FOR LUIS AND FILLS UPON ME 'COW AND T7LICis SHOWN ON 77115 PUT W THE ORIGINAL REASONABLE GRADING Or 540 STREETS SHOWN THEREON. INC WATER OWES ARE OW'Nf*.BY WATER DISTRICT 125 AND THE SEWER LINES ME OWNED BY VAL VW: DISTRICT. S • , TINS Om.01TRON OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND UTILITIES IS SUBJECT TO MEW CVMP(E7ICN BY M£ DEVELOPER AND THE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL BY INC PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MAT THEY HAVE BEEN COMPLLRD To CITY STANDARDS. NE AND ALL OF MIR SUCCESSORS WAIVE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ARISING IROM MC CONSTRICTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC FACTURES AND PUBLIC PROPERTY weal THE SUBOMSION. (17.04.060 B .2) TINE DETENTION TRACT IS DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA UPON RECORDING R 5 OF THIS SUBDMSRW. IN of :$WHERE� " „OF WE FIVE SET OUR IWIOS Alto sass n05 j'B • '7 OF 5. 137TH STREET AS SHOWN. AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED ro THE CITY Or 7UKW' .A SEATTLE CITY LIGHT. ONEST TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T CROSS REFERENCE: CABLE TV AND OTHER unLmrs AND THEW REVEL SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, UNDER AND UPON MC EXTERIOR TEN FEET OF ALL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL REFERENCE Is AMBE 10 THE FOLLOWING SURVEYS FOR LOTS AND TRACTS PARALLEL WITH AND App1NING EKISTWG OR PROPOSED ACCESS R OF WAY AND TRACTS MOTH PRIVATE AND THE FLIT OF IDSfERWEW ESTATES, VOL SECTION SUBDMSION AND TIE INFORMATION: 191, PC. 61. PUOLG). AS 17171 AS AN CASEMENT WMIIN ALL PRIVATE ROADS 771E PUT' OF FD57DRN GARDEN 754015 VOL 9, PG. 9S TRACTS AND OM•ES. IN NMCH TO INSTALL LAY. CONSTRUCT, WISE RECORD a SURVEY BOOK 73, PAGE It. OPERATE AND MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION S2TYEVS WITH RECORDS OF KING COU%; WASHINGTON. NECESSARY FACILITIES AND N ND O EOIfiPMEM FOR THE PURPOSE OF SERVING MIS SUBO AND OTHER PROPERTY HERON STATED. NO LANE OR WIRES FOR Pi THE t TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC CURRENT OR RE ;! •SURVEYO R S NOTE MR TELEPHONE USE f.AB(E 7EIEASKTN, FIRE OR PONCE SIGNALS OR OTHER PURPOSES SHALL BE O ANY LOT UNLESS THE DEPARTMENT PUNNING AN YOMMItW7Y ce NT E +wnk:ed and aTgrowd Ihthis L� of I • . 200{ , + d -`':: ` / f ' 1 _ ` ^•- •• Af .,. t. E .i Chdr. Short SuLyd,Keiort:tommi/tse ... „,„ • . > . ' • t , t' t INOL • ,: ,.S:n, SAME SHALL BE UNDERGROUND OR IN NN C 3 a }• CONDUIT ATTACHED A ' . •• 1. 1. : W W7nl '4, WPM,/ C THIS SURVEY PERFORMED A S J NS ACC BY TRAVERSE 5411 BUILDING • j y , T " : . METHODS. •. ANND D MEET O R T XCEEED ED ACCURACY STANDARDS •• t' OR E '44 • +, . OF T..$t1, 000. ,S`• t' RESTRICTIONS.' <� ::�. • CDfRRIGIfI' BY CRONES * ASSOCARS LAND SURVEYORS S A." • •::I• SOLD OR RS' NO LOT OR SOLD OR OF A LSRS H IN IW1 PUT 4 SF O/ED AND ' O'' 1765 P O UT HALL BE E LESS BE LESS S TILAN P O N O F 41 A W TS RIM ` VERTICAL DATUM: THE OWNERSHIP IP OR ANY Y PHE '? USE NCH '' •T ': THE AREA REWIRED FOR THE VS£ DISTRICRIC T IN WHICH LOCATED. BENCHMIRK'USED 101142WRCAL CATUM IS THE NEST RIM OP:AIL •'• SAIOARY SEWER M4IPLE IIH SS O/ 1340/ STREEFNEAt THE { / SOUnear CORNER OF TRACT '6. IN FOSTRA GAREN TRACTS' • •;VOL 9/95; 540 MANHOLE BEWC,77ED ro ARMY CO , • ' BENCH PPGD,OZC 1965 BY DANE EVANS & ASSOG'. :: a• : A: . ` atV AION...' 1509 F(tT MEAN 5F LEVEL ( : • . '" r, • .:. .... ••• ; • SUBDMSON NOTES: • : (/` � _ . , •ti VICINITY MAP I. Aii ON ARE T0,•LE REMOVA BEFORE 5' • ' //�� /.�E11ZI nC{(F} Y : '•• ; ilk RECORDING O• THIS SUOPMS .; • 't ,( NOT TO SCALE ':1, ALL NNSPOliTS. F00ONG'ORAINS AND DRAWSPlial ( Print 'D UD CONNECTED TO THE PERMANENT STORMRNNN O SHOWN ON TIE APPROVED CONSTRULTTO/ DRAWINGS 0.Y TIE ern THE CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORK9'QQEPARD T.• IEN' TIM PLAN SINLL OC SLLTM•77ED. wan THE APPLICATION ISO AVF, plate plate PnaRT. .. i .. . _ 4. INC DETENTION TRACT IS DEDICATED 70 17/C THE RECORDING O' THIS SUBOMSION. •,. HW • s. THIS SUBDMSION SL COMPLY Will GEOECNW/61L ENGINEETNhIG :, •M1 REPORTS KR ZAN & ASSOCIATES. me. DATED FEBRUARY 20. 2001 AUGUST AND AUST 9. 2002 AND SUBSEOVOIT OEOTECHN/CAL REPORTS. 6. NO RUNOFF; INCLUDING DOWNSPOUTS SHALL Bf INFILTRATED INTO "' THE (WOUND THROUGH TRY WELLS' OR PERIDRATED INFILTRATION PIPES AND TRENCHES. •• • ' i N . • • 5 '? •` . I 130TH Sr LLd • • CITY OF TUi(WILA h 'P � a � , ' 4P �Q•/ Name) (fyint None) ,•• (STq,elun).: + , + • 2 �y y!4' -' (Signature) i• .' ii STATE Or WASHINGTON ` , County of King ,:'' �'' :• • ; On this day penonulyt befgte L3 ah -..awZ Ct:a'.14, to me known to beflhr aisiauol whO d E R for o/OQ InstnAtnt, BY' and acIno.l.d0ed IlloWhe eigned the - banns of o yptintorr • 7}, �, 'rp 1. i 'T • a lV act and deed for the ;rs.4 and purposes mentioned therein.,, � . GNEN under my hand and offetel.seol this 30 �'' r' day of �a . Chth ..... .• _ 3.5' i afa: F' /""✓ ,� ff//'')fL , �_,�,joE.� "'•N Z..6.:01. ..J S q n r. E " �:� " .... } t G C(1UNT1 •• S 7. INLKNOLW. HOUSE FOUNDATIONS ANO ORNNAGf SYSTEM" SHALL PROVIDE A SMOG CFOTECIINIGIL ASSESSMENT; PITH FlNRAW_ DF9Wl : aOCOMECDMMENLUrGNS • \ \ \ 1 f/ ' (sv commissioner/. Ba( bora \ T I S d,�i l on 4 e •• a mi. N -4 t't. T LA40 t‘ G •' I rtil7 thgl` • . •p}fty tons rp.:'po-0 and Inot a• lt:Ana beer; that " Yu f f c l en l t to pays the tans for follbt& peon,•: mere an no &Inq• sp}c,al s certified to this:: office herein dedicated l a. sir. 'p°cih e . nat own •• p :91 .for other er pu blic : Lse n a pod In lull. •' Examined and appweA:• this • 6. i NSTAUTWN Or RES/OCMNI. FIRE SPRINKLER SToiLMS WILL BE REQUIRED IN 774E HOMES TO BE BUILT ON LOIS • AND 6. PER CITY Dr MOW FIRE MANSTML1• .•. EJT TbALT " TO r.9. AN U E/ER :f TN LL Lo T • :% rw R cu OL s• 4 N •1 I I /V /S MERE GLAa rE0 UPON T,pE RECOAD /ND OA THIS SIT 1;T°" w I i • ..J Il l 33'22: My appointment expires: 3 -.X:1-10 -.X:1-.X:1-10 - POdp. Trt I II )E EYI a tt" '.��E STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day penon.lty appeared beton m , r :..•,• ' /d . 3 US'D /VII N , ; Dep 'q County Tnasurer King County Treasurer • • • •.IIi1T AREAS: .•:: ' to me known to be the Individual who *muted the foregoing instrument e/ and acknowledged that hshe signed the same hi e oa TAO= voluntary act and deed for the uses and p aposes mentioned therein. Step ands Try hand and aOCIal ,.al I/ds day of . • ••'••'V• ' ` • ' • , KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSES TOTAL PLAY 132,79 SO. Fre. OS ACRES,k TRACT 4 45751 SO. Mt, 0.95 ACRESt ; : • i0 i %isuso n3 au,Aicn£�si ::' MEAN LOT WIDTHS: 1 ' Esom:ned and opprosed this J.Ss_ day of 20Q5-1. - ° Sr. � �} -� f� (� ' �-=- + �f2"l� • : • L07. J. 7,481. 50. FE S. 0:47 ACRES* .. LOT • 7072 SO. FED, ; 016 ACRES&. '•CDT'}' +•. L66.9' LOT S: 6.534 s0. F7.f, O.IS ACRES*. LOT 2 - 56.'t;. • • LOT 6: 7067 . 00 0'SR,FK3. 0.15 ACR;S± •• LOT • - 5dA' •" LOT 0 S Fft, O.I6 AC{2E'St 7.' LOT 6: 9,003 50. FT.t, 011 A('RESt :' Jdl"6;- 656' STynolun: Name of commissioned: - Assns r / �T f.o (IP4TI /I /, 1,.L+ . $OT 6 ?e • 661' DETENTION TRACT: 3,967 50. 7T.t, 0.14 ACRES.* LOT:TT. <6. <J' , ....J d - 957' TUYJ My appoinlmen .spins: Deput Assessor rq . �r Account Number o 1320 20 - CASE . f 3' ..,. . I• .... • RECORDER CERTIFICATE filed for record this � day of.� :!13.,20 ev a tlT:)p. M y • Yl In bookawl....of..L.'4:,at page 7 rpt the request of �\\ OA V a UJ •� L,JyD+•'A.c w• Mgr. Supt. of Records a • LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 4 JAMES D. CRONES. REGISTERED AS A LAND SURVEYOR BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. CERTIFY MAT MIS PLAT s;aASrO ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY of THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN, CONDUCTED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION: 71417 ONE IX 77047 . C AND ANGLES ARC SWOON IN£RE TN CORRECTLY; AND TINT AGI UML?N6 O7NfR THAN THOSE MONUMENTS APPROVED FOR SCTTINC AT A LATER LATE. NAVE BEEN SR AND LOT CORNERS STAKED ON INC GROUND AS OEFYCJLD ON 111C PUT. ' Certificate No. ^� ..29.537.... Date: 1719 -04 .... 1 C Q N l (i w " „� 23806 190TH AK CRONES 01 ASSOC. , n: c/ : 1 y4 % ' �. " ` '� �e • • °r ° ro " F •. . t 1 • 1 '. r • ar t .-2:4 E ' d✓ i 77eTI ° • , ' N h h,L L'N „ ,, �I � Imp . ��«« «< «� Jr, I ' SI TO RT . ; :I�LAT;: FO i C�e T� }}���rT� T 7 j T . : } .J ARA 1l'L• V L' LOPME 1 .. ,y' ` • " • . . .: ' •:.. • ' LAND SURVEYORS SC K ENT, WA 95042 (425) 432 -5930 OWN. BY ML5 / KMD /G DATE : ......JOB :. } AUGUST,. 1 ;;; NO,,;:' SUTAD -IA $MOTIF PUT.ONG CHKD. BY EMW / ©CAW RENSi =D 1/26/04 SHEET.' 1 ....: •3 x, Z W J U 00 • 0 W W I W • 0 j 1 V1�. 11.1 Z I' ZI- W U O � _ O I- W Ll.1 I - U LL 0 L LI Z U _= 0 z ,G`ity .9•Y'--Tukwila • SHORT''PLAT C(d. L01 -033 • MALT A (OPEN Sp,R,FI' &PORTION OF y TR � ACT 19. :TOSTORM'GMIDEH TRACTS ACCORDING TO NNE PUT THERCop . RECORDED W WLUME P 'Or PUT$, JTACE.0.T,• {+•CORDS OF KONG COUNTY, WASI1/NG70N, DESCRIBED Ag•FOLLOWS: ..., B(YJNMNO: AT THE.NORMEAS• CORNER O' SAID 1RAC7:'19; THENCE 5)0728'09W ALONG THE EAST LLWE OF SW !RACE. 29 /.%'FEET. TO THE SOUII EAST CORNER OF 5410 TRACT 19; MENDS N88.12:49W N. NG•)I/E SOUM;LINE OF 5W ;TRACT 19. 151.48 FEET; THENCE ry0 7'4659Z •156.21 FEET.,THENCE NO0 909 FEET,' T /FNCC1723r.997 93.05 ,. -INLET TO T1/E'SOUDnRLW4lARGIV OF SOUTH 135TH: STREET.• 3HE S66'14'24•'ALONG SA0 SOUTICRErMARGIN 105.48 FEET TO,..711E POMVT .OF BEGO:MYWO. • A P0110 OF IRALT 19, rosroAl1 GARDEN BRACTS:ACCORDING 10••tHE PUr. THEREOF =OR VOLUTE 9 OF PUTS PAGE 9S, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. 5ASH/NGTOV; DESCRIBED AS: MEOWS: Cy � COMMENCING AT INC NORIT,EAST CORNER OF SA/0 TRACT 79: THE7ICE y�''2609W ACING • ' r '• THE EAST LINE OF SW INACt •197,40 FEET TO:THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAD TRACT 79; THENCE N8631'49W ALONG THE SOT/11l UNE OF.•S40 TRACT • •IA. •)51.48 FEET TOME PCWT�: OF BECWMNO THENCE NO74639Z 156.27 FEEt•,R/E!CE N502434W. 91.99,07; THENCE S75'57531W, 54.96 FEED THENCE .555 15269 FEET TO TH NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH AND :1D A POINT ON A,NON- TANGO/YC. CURVE ME RADIUS OF WMCII BEARS N5624'397: MENG£'OH 256.M6 FOOT R10141.,' CORE TO THE LEFT ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN. THROU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6'1501' AN ARC LENGTH OF 36.93 FEET TO A POINT OP TANGENCY; HENCE S47' b'23 E ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN. 777.78 FEET TO A FLINT OF CURVE T /ENOC ON A 470.97 FOOT RADIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT ALONG SAD NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN,'419R000H A ,i• CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4:31 AN ARC LENGTH OFF J7.14 FELT TO THE SOUTH LINE dP'S4s: +' TRACT 19; THENCE 58632'49• 10 ALONG 54 SOUTH UNE 31.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF •• BEGINNING SUBJECT TO =ITV AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS �AA 7/ON OF TRACT 19, FOSTORA GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF MOOED IV VOLUME 9 OF PUTS. PAGE 95. RECORDS OF RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT ME NORTHEAST CORNER OF 5AD TRACT 79; THENCE N667424 W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 735111 5718:67 .10547 FEET TO THE NINE OF BEGINNING; THENCE 524'52 93.05 FEET' 7IETk5:SJ557'S3W 54.96 FEED. THENCE S55'18 152.89 FEET TO THE NORJHEASTERLY MARG7,6 OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH AND TO A POINT ON A NON- 1MCElT CARVE ME RADIUS OP WICN SEARS 1561439'• THENCE ON A 256.48 FOOL RADIAL CURVE TO MCRIGHT ALONG SID M241HEGTERLY MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3518'07' AY•:1RC LENGTH OF 60.29 FEET; ME/CE N5(38176'E 139.67 FEET; THENCE N67D6 73 FEET .110:71(C PORT OF BEbWMNG SUBJECT 70 U71)TY AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: A PORTION OF TRACT 19, 105705/4 GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING 10 ME FLIT THEREOF RECORDED M lOL1)A/E 9 OF FATS, PAGE 95, RECORDS or RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIRFD AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUO TRACT 19, THENCE N661424,9 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AARON OF 50UT7/ 135TH STREET 108.47 FEET,; THENCE 56T08'411V, 739.47 FEET TO THE PINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE N320509W 53.01 FEET' THENCE 56024'5611' 118.55 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH AUTO TO A POINT ON A NON- TANGENT CURIE THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS N8425'12Z THENCE ON A 256.48 FOOT RADIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT ALONG 5410 NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN THRO/IH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 74'32:76' AN ARC LENGTH OF 65.11 FEET: HENCE N56•38'06E, 139.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SUBJECT TO UIWTY AND PRIVATE LRASWAY EASEMENTS. LOLL A PoAIION OF TRACT 19, FOSTOR GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 95, . EN RECORDS OF TONG COUNTY. WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS .... COMMENCING AT M£'IIORMFAST CORNER of SAID TRACT It THENCE 71617424W ALONG TIC ,SOUTHERLY MARGIN ELT' SOUTH 135711 STREET 106.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ' ,,159.45 FEET,' THENCE NJ:0509W, 53.01 FEET; THENCE N6g26Y9'E 706.70 FEET TO THE 507177 /ER& MARGIN OF.SOUM.).75JH STREET: THENCE 5454239E ALONG 5410 SOUTHERLY•4AARGW. 39.60:FEET;; THENCE 56•1424E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN, .3865 FEET TO 17/C PO/N7 BEGINNING. SUBJECT 773:E)1UTY.ANO PRNAT£ DRNLWAY EASEMENTS. • A''POAl1DW.bF TRACT 19, FDSTC771( GIRDER 17 AET5 ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED , IN VOLUMEIDDF PUTS, PACE 95.:fECORDS OF•KWO,COUMY• WASHNCTON,• DESCRIBED AS ,5 } FOLLOWS• ,•• . i ;• t ,. •: ., .. '. COMWENC11/6 AT THE N R7(IEA'+Y CORNER OF WQ 19: THENCE N6•I424W ALONG THE 50U7NERCT MARGIN OP LOUTH 7357// STREET• )58.47 FEET. THENCE S671047W 139.47 FE£7 INENCC N32 132.01 FEET•;10 THE PONE OF BLGINNING) ENCE 560•5515 11155 FEET 117 THE EASTERLY MLARGIN OF 4.910 AVENUE: SOUTH AND, TO :A P '2 00/7' OH.A NON - TANGENT CURVE, TH£ :RADIUS OF 1911CH UFAR5:WE42572F'THENCE, O'( A 25848 FOOT Aka % CURVE TO MC Apo ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARCW. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7D2'47' AN ARC :LENGTH O' 3334 FEET TD'A POINT OF:TANGE/ICY ;; THENCE N07•8 ALONG THE EASTERLY • OF 43RD A SOUP?. 44.0 FEET TTICNCf,/R6d'TY,19E 65.96:1117"; THENCE ••. • 57205'0 65.98 FELT TO ME HINT OP., (GINNING. . T0'1I PRE/ATE *MICE EAS£MCM: ::., • AA SOO OF TR.4 FOSTORA G4J4 N TTACTS:ACCORING TO THE PUT • T HEREON RECORDED.. IN VOLUME 9 OF FLATS; PARE 95. RECORDS OF RICO COUNTY. WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS • :. . , :: ,a` • COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER' :OF SAID TRACT 19; THENc4 ALONG DIE SOUTHERLY MIAC/N OF SOUTH 13511H STREET; 34771 FEED THEK{'').45•42'5914 ALONG ,040 SOUTHERLY CAROM, 39.80 FEET TO THE F7NT'bE:7C •)kENCE N45742'59W . ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY .MARGIN, 6597 FEED THE/A:C 58011'79 W 90.41 :'FEET THENCE 11705 65.98 FEET; THEME N6026'4O 5 106.70 FEET TO THE FAINT OF BEG/NI/INC. o SUBJECT TO UTILITY AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS ..• _ A POTION OF TRACT 79, FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING TO ME PUT THEREOF RECORDED M VOLUME 9 OF PLATS PACE 95 RECORDS OF R /NCI COUNTY, WASHINGTON: DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAD TRACT 19; THENCE N66742411' ALONG ME SOUTRRLY MARGIN OF 501)171 735111 STREET, 147.12 FEET, THENCE N45•259W ALONG SAD SOUTHERLY MARGIN, 706.77 FEET TO MC POINT of DEINN /NC,• CONRNUING THENCE N45'42'5971 ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EMRCw, 2578 FEET: THENCE 5774522W,, 72E64 FEET TD THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE 507'28'O9 W ALONG SAD EASTERLY MARGIN, 77.01 FEET; THENCE N60'1419'E /68.80 FEET TO THE PINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO A DRAINAGE EASEMENT. .4 PORTION OF TRACE 19. F0570RIA GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING 10 ME PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PUTS. PACE 95 RECORDS OF RING COUNTY, WASHOGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 19; THENCE N66'14'24W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 135TH STREET, 147.12 FEET, THENCE N4S42'59W ALONG 540 SOUTHERLY MARGIN, 737.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; MACE 5774522W. 125.84 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH; )HENCE N0128'09E ALONG 5410 EASTERLY MARGIN, 142.04 FEET; THENCE 115702'40' 76.53 FEET TO THE W157E4LY MARGIN OF 501)1H 135TH STREET; THENCE 00153'786/ ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, /4.7) FEET,• THENCE 54142'597 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OP S40 SOUTH 735TH STREET, 744.29 FEET TO ME POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT 773 A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT. ,:: 0FIFNM1N TRACT (P/M)• T' A PORE OF LAACT 7 / 9. E95. RECORDS GARDEN MALTS ACCORDING 70 THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN 9 VOLUME 9 OP PUTS, PACE 95, RECORDS OP RING COUNTY, WASNWC70N, DESCRIBED AS P0/50/45/ • COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNLR OP S40 TRACT 19; MINCE N6674 24 W ALONG TIE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 135TH STREET, 147.72 FEET THENCE N45Y2'59 W ALONG SAID SOUII,IERLY MARGIN. 281.65 FEET, HENCE N05'53'18E ALONG S40 W'ESTERO MARGIN, 14.73 FEET TO ,. •TH[ P/WC'DF,9E0/NMNC; COMBING THENCE /15553'181 ALONG 5410 LATTERLY MAIN 193.80 FEET 70 THE SOUTIWE WRC /N OF 42ND AVQIU 'SQU7N. THENCE N29'17'27W ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY MARLIN „65.40 FEET TO TH1CASTERL /LJ.44RCW OF 43RD AVENUE SOU77C THENCE :,.501$9 ;99.144ALONG SA/D.E:4STERLY M4RGOA'250.20 /;CET THENCE N8102'405 18.57 FEET TO THE ''NAT OF BEDI{N1NG. IMOIMMEMEMMONEEMEMI � •r N EZF.Sd WI LR31i 4..Lb4. .1 IMIN1GI1■IT4K1 ∎N4N4SY. iRd i MMtgJ:MM D TI IMMEM141:CY...Y ■fkl !I l NIMMd IMMit4VEC➢TY9 MINIM 1■1nlif+Y•AIR INNINI1. MINIm INIMPal BFI ∎ =1 ".: EASEL EN 'LINE TABLE 43RD AVENUE S. 24' MOO' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 10' PRIVATE CASEMENT /DR SERVICE TO LOT 6 TRACT "A" OPEN SPACE 70' PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR SERVICE TO LOT 4 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 60 I. OAKS I/27/CS • CHKD. BY EMW /BOW 'JOB NO. ; SARAD 1A2.5HOPT PATOWG ;: SHEET•:, :I , 2 /OF 3 21506 790TH Al£ SE. NINE WA 95042 (415) 432 -5930 RECORDING N0. eL o . _ gco003 VOL. /PAGE L PORTION OF /4 of ?LE. _1/4, S. _ T. 23N R. 4E _W.M. SHORT SARA DE OWN. BY MLS /KNOB /GRA Z • • W cc 2 W i0 O 0 co CD W -i CD LL H W u. 5 • Py W H Z Z O W W U � ♦4� V - • L 1- W W I H o 11 Z W U= 0 Z NO. RADIUS LENCM •: 0474 I �nzni 47097• 37.14' 4'J1O5 25548' .55.93' 8•15•2' 256.48' 6029' 172807' 255.48' 65.11' 140236' 256.46' 31.54' 70247' pity 91 -- Tukwila ;`•• SHORT:pLAT 0. L01 -033 297.40 /(M)) 292.587PJ RACT "A WWTER MAR K T OPEN SPACE ^ R/W LEGEND: FOUND LONG YON.. 94 CASE S W/N (PER FLAT OF FOSSERNEW 9074795) O FUND 6904)? • SET 5 /8' REBLR. Is / 29537 R/W R,CHT OF WAY BUILDING SETBACKS: 20' FRONr YARD 5E7640K 7)P7CY. 5Q REAR ZE YARD 57 SETBACK TYPICAL KN TY i�5'\ 1 ,, •• : FOL)0 RETAIL ' 19583 .:1.`" L> ,, : r se nit,,,, 3/4 • IRON PIPE �L I�. 0, P.4,4 05 TUSP 79 -26 –SS 8004240503 F7HiN L5/ ii AO C.APR904 / Py � , 5 7 11 •S.r•i ;' 2aiff " 'I 4%166 TRACT ( G P7, ' ) 2$020• r9 ':1410 {. L2 :,. • ,;u uza o • .....•••• ; l . ' • ` - 43RD AVE j\ U C. } LOT ADDRESSES: / M1 e \ M1� tT TRACT 4' - 13441 MACADAM ROAD. 799•1).1 WA 98168 LOT I - 13542 43RD AYE, SOUTH, TUKWi(1 WA 90168 ME, 2 - 73532 43RD E, SOUTH, 7UKW7lA WA 96166 LOT 3 - 1.3522 4360 AVE. SOUTH, 7740+14, WA 98168 LOT 4 - 13435 MACADAM ROAD, 77161+7.) WA 98168 LOT 5 - 13512 43RD AYE, 501)7[ 79901[1 WA 96163 LOT 6 - 13425 LL4C.A040 8040, 7990111 WA 98168 LOT 7 - 13434 43ND AVE. SOUTH, TUKW7I1 WA 98168 LOT 8 - 13428 4360 AYE, SOUTH, TUKWIL. WA 98168 DET. TRACT - 13405 SOUK Alt. 50U TINOW A, WA 98168 / / 454`1. Cry r �S \ T \d < o a / 1 1. \ \9 sn < -:'-6,\.\\-;, a 'U \ 1 1 3 \v e h ° \ \ t.... �>, ' \ 4 e 4�.0 1 j ro \ -' y \ \ o ` C' \ , LOT 6 H>Il I 1 6\ ' , :n 0 6ss � `S.\ \ • \\ ��$AB 20,059. 1 zo' n e[_,7 \‘.....72T` 2 \ �:g ' J.1 d CURVE TABLE '' ••;' : LINE TABLE.'' .. _ .: i':%A: GAR `_` TRACTS 'S VOL. 9, PAGE 95 rR4C!' 20 50176'o9w 76'3 3, R.235.4.5' T- 216.35' Dw 46'3450' —===s— z _ • LI ,1219 Y333' L2•••05 14.73' • 00)? 9 F LOT l. ...... , ,,, CRONES & ASSOC. LAND SURVEYORS 23806 19071 AYE SE 5090 WA 96042 (425) 432 -5930 E CREEK 5%74 959•)" 1 56.21 RECORDING NO. 4 0 it q 00003 PORTION OF /4 of N_E__1 /4, S._I T. 23N_ R W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE 11 Inch a 60 Ij, CON. OF / ` I l 4 N66 J2w -R- " As /,.--- .t: ` 6. 1 71 FRAC'i 'C' (P O FOSTERVEN ESTATE'S) • S46'09 • DWN. Al LS /KM © /c RA CHKD. BY VOL. /PAGE IL7 (29 S TA TE S FOSTERVI 9w pG 6 11 200.0 1 /.2 = 5 10 / 10 0 REVISED' ;, /04/04:: )' S6'I9'S -R La 0 0_ .i5 7 SHORT .,FLAT SARA DgVELOPME,Wr BY JOB N9 SIR4D - 1A . AORT P140.0W0 L SHEET[:•, EMw stir 3 :: :F 3 Dp;TE :.1/ JST SCALE "" • 60' Z I , Z W 00 W = J � CO IL w 2 g Q. = F "' W _ Z Z O W W . U m 1-- W W I - U Li. 1 w U = o z CA) ui :1 E Imml el:4 E • • 4:t t* cJ4d � a 0 ' o : ci4) cra c.4.) NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT: ; • � � / \ � �I � ) r : »: - _ _: mitrtt NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.., File: L 1-O� • • . • 35mm ••• • #1 • I LEGEND Test Pit Location Existing Structures Proposed New Construction Proposed Setback (Krazan) Topography Line (2 foot Intervals) Cross-section Line Creek Alignment TP-1 — - 1 L _ Note: Site Plan Developed From Drawing.Provided By Sarah Development , Inc. Scale: 1 in = 60 feet Date: February 15, 2001 B' 1-1 art • . . 0 30 60 • 120 im■Ill•••• (In Feet) Contour Interval 2 feet Site Plan Sarah Development Job Number: 092 - 01004 Kraz & ASSOCIATES, INC. Figure 2 Drawn By: WRJ Reviewed By: C.B./T.G.B Drawing Number: .2 Drawing Type: Site Plan ri l l 1111 1 111 1 1 111 1 111 1 1 W 1 4 - ki j . 1110111 I I 11111 NI Inch I/16 /. I 5 , 21 • • " AVESTCOTr Since 1872" 1 111 II 111111lllil 111 II,I �Ii IIL IIIIIII 1 111 III III IIIIIII 111 ill Ililll.l 11 I I I I, 1 2 I I I ! I I . L . : I ...L. I 1 I I � Inch t�is 3 ' `r* ;" 5I 6 W STCOTT ®' y' .. Since 187, =.' � . I 9j4 bll 6IL ZIL H. oil Is •I9 IL I9 I4 It IE IZ II• w9l II nnlini ini(iln IniIiii Illilil,l iiiihw iwlun nnlnu iwlini iwIit t liuhni iililiiil nilliu iIIIIniI i,ihui nnllul A CROSSSECTIONA-.A' A' 150 Elevation (tt) 150 • • 140 Surface Profile --� 140 130 130 120 110 Proposed Building Location -� 120 110 100 Surface 100 Profile 90 90 0 50 100 • 150 200 250 300 (ft) • B' CROSS SECTION B' -B B 140 Elevation (ft) . Proposed Building Location 140 130 130 � 120 120 110 Surface P Mile —NA 110 100 Creek Alignment 100 90 90 • 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 (ft) - Note: Site Plan Developed From Drawing Provided By Sarah Development , Inc. Finish Floor elevations have not been established at this time. The structures shown on slope areas reflect proposed placement . • Cross Sections Sarah Development Figure 3 Job Number:. 092 - 01004 Drawn Bv: WRJ Reviewed By: C,B./T.G.B Date: February 15, 2001 & ASSOCIATES, INC. Drawing Number: 2 Drawing Type: Site Plan 1 111 II 111111lllil 111 II,I �Ii IIL IIIIIII 1 111 III III IIIIIII 111 ill Ililll.l 11 I I I I, 1 2 I I I ! I I . L . : I ...L. I 1 I I � Inch t�is 3 ' `r* ;" 5I 6 W STCOTT ®' y' .. Since 187, =.' � . I 9j4 bll 6IL ZIL H. oil Is •I9 IL I9 I4 It IE IZ II• w9l II nnlini ini(iln IniIiii Illilil,l iiiihw iwlun nnlnu iwlini iwIit t liuhni iililiiil nilliu iIIIIniI i,ihui nnllul LOI-Ot33• 35mm Drawing •#3 r 1 1101111j 1:1 Inch 10 $ ; • • • ••,• • •••• 21: - 51 '• • - 61 • WSTCOfl ; 19 • ".1£ • 1 1J 0 1' • 11111111 . 11111111111111111111111111111111 1 1110 161111 1 11141611011110111111110111101111111111 . 11111.11h.111111.(11111111iliIIIIIIII . 11111111 File: LO1-0033 35mm Drawing #4- 13 in:•11�IJrpil as , fr:�ar.�wi a BUS STOP SIGN 1 d 1 TUSP 79-26--SS 8004240503 FOUND REBAR; LS# 16650 RAW X WIDENING NE jc7` "_.__ DRAIN CULVERT 24 CONCRETE FOUND REBAR; NO CAP • FOUND REBAR; LS# 19583 FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE BACK OF SIDEWALK WIDENING NEW EOP CULVERT IN; 4' X 4' CONCRETE } 4 , 1 1 . 1 1 1 i H�lli���i1ifii�l11 1 4i_ii i i.!.1±. 0 !113 ,11,1A11.1(�1. III i1 1 2 _ ;3.. ; r Inch in6 � � � � r'STCOTT • Since i872"1 -70 4%2° ,��";��u ✓r�'.;, c' .,... •0000• C,I;.IVIL'fs !v r � 0.00000 r P�A�B`_ G.:.SY oOjLO 6_Q • 00000 • I " RL • \i3 FOS I ORIA GARDEN VOL. 9, PAGE CULVERT OUT, 12" CONCRETE . LO T 2 y 4 01 5 r a • A • CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. ;TREE RER % 'CEMENT RK rI ,S sJ 4 -B INCHES 8 -12 INCHES 12 -18 INCHES I5 -24 INCHES >24 INCHES (CITY OF TUKWILA REOUIREMENTS) NO. LACEMENT TREES OF REP REOUIREO I TREE 2 TREES 4 TREES S TREES 6 TREES PLANT%REPL ACEiVIEt T%'A,AIREAS.:. TOTAL AREA Or REPLACEMENT PUNTING REPLACEMENT PUNTING MU REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PLANTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA REPLACEMENT PUNTING ARE D REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA I REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA I REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA 2 REPLACEMENT PUNTING AREA J 3,410 1,742 S.F. 732 S.F. 2,375 S.F. 5,390 S.F. 255 S.F. 725 S.F. 2,100 S.F. 1,170 S.F. 2,000 S.F. 2.310 S.F. 470 S.F. 845 S.r. (%l 4r/ 1;\,`.1's O EN , , i j % i wZl:i . PSEUOTSUGA MENZIESII (DOLMAS FIR) THUM FLICATA (WESTERN RED CEDAR) ACER CIRCINATUM ANNE MAPLE) RHODODENDRON OCCIDENTALE + (WESTERN A2ALEA) O MAHONM AOUIFOLIUM (OREGON GRAPE) • GAULMERIA SHALLOT/ ( SHALL) COTOHEASTER DAMES (BEARBERRY COTONEASTER) 24• H 31 H 24• H NOT ALL PLANT MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN CLOUDED ON PLAN TO MAMAS GRAPHIC CLARITY QUANTITY SPACING NATNE ]] SEE PLAN YES SEE PLAN YES SEE PUN YES SEE PUN YES SEE PLAN YES SEE PLAN YES O' O.c. No MCT05TAPHYLOS WA -URSI I GAL. 2,125 S.F. T8• O.C. YES (KINHIMINNICK) • MULTI -TRUNK TREE TO EQUAL 2 -1/2' (LE. 6 TRUNKS AT l /2• EACH • 2,51 •• GRILL ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH NILDFLOWER PLUS GRASSES SEED MIXTURE BY COUNTRY GREEN TURF PRAMS (I -800- 300 -1763) South 135th Street NEWT F.)) Z EX. TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. EN AREA 13 OR V THEE OVATIONS 4 000UIONAL TREES REMOVED OVE TO GRADING /FIELD CONEIPOI:S I -16', I -I5'. I -IS' - 20 ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENT TREES ADDEO REPLACEMENT MU NEAR 501111. PLUS ASSOCIAaal SHRURS AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTS, PROPOSED DOUGLAS FIR AND WESTERN RED CEDAR TREES HAVE MEN )� SHIFTED A FEW FEET FURTHER AWAY FROM THE EDGE or THE VAULT. WATER ABSORBING SOIL POLYMERS ARE PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT. ALL NEW PUNT MATERIAL IS EITHER NATIVE AND /OR DROUGHT - TOLERANT. HOWEVER, PROPER LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE INCLUDING SECULAR WATERINO) SHALL DE PROVIDED BY DIE OWNER FOR THE FIRST IWO GROWING SEASONS UNTIL NEW PLANTS ARE ESIABUSHELL. VELY CLEAR .1REA TO BE PLANTED (TYP REPLACEMENT L' PLANTING AREA 1 1,742 S.F. _r ROOIRALL A IT V 12' Ml BD1N STIES SAN. SEWER STUB OUTS, TYPICAL RUBBER HOSE. DONE 0.010 INTO STARE TO HOLD WIRE IN PLACE -L-2 -TREE SIANES -2 DM. B' -0' LONG LODGE POLES DR ROUGH CUT OR. ORM X10 GROUND A MIN. Of ]' -O AND AT A SUCK ANGLE AND SECURC IN A VERTICAL POSTION WI THE WIRE. PRE -STAN STARES A DARN BOONS. P OF MULCH IN SOIL SAUCER CREATED Of PERIMETER T ERN. (SHOWN IN BACKGROUND) us( 1011501. AND PLUM G TOPSOIL AT A III RAM. TOP OF BURLAP BALL SIMLL BE CUT, REMOVE TOP I/] Or BURLAP. NON- THODEORADABLE MATERIAL SHALL ME 'F MEATS IN ITS ENRREIY. SET TREE ON 6' Or COMPACIEU 101501 IF SET TREE AT ORIGINAL DEPTH Of THAT AT NURSERY. RUT DEPRESSED 4. OELOW MARSH CRADL TEMPORARY • I ))NS)RUC110ll" I )')TRANCE, SEE/ CIVIL PLANS/ / ▪ - PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PRUNE MY MAD OR BROKEN BRANCHES OR PRUNE TO SLOPE W MOORED. SECURE SNRUM N AN - -+ UPRIGHT POSIRON REMOVE ME TOP 113 10 1 OF THE DV TAP SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENT ADDITION ALL NEW SITE WORK, NEW CONCRETE CURB SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY ON THIS SHEET E NEW 6.0' SIDEWALK 35.0' WIDE STREAM BUFFER STREAM 35.0' WIn[ S(IAFA11 n)1 FFR GEOTECHNICAL BUFFER (BY OTHERS) SHRUB PLANTING ROPOSED• DRIVEWAY I. AT L IS E D OLOA T H OVER A SINOLC 11500 SEINE SHALL IT USED 10 SECURE SHRUB. LOOP A SOUR TIE MOUND STN PWII Om MOOVEM IMVL 2. WATER S A DttP SOAKING NMEO(41ELY FOR moms; SET BASE BF IAVNK Al ORIGNAL ERNE CB NOT LIMA TRUNK w /IRK 2' MW. BARK MULCH LITER CREATE A WATERING ISM CONSISIRIl M TOP500. AT PERIMETER Or SHRUG UNDISNRGED BACKRAL 50411? SHOES • P511CM Or RAIDNS PIT. 4. -G• LNELINO MOUND Or COMPICTEO TOPSOIL t `-\ AREA OF FUTURE ` M PS \l })OMESIT! l LOT 4 N \ REP LA EMENT PLANT) G AREA '12,100 .F. •I. W •J N' N. H. .4 •4 N WA ER NEW CO METER BOXES CURB PROPOSED DAIVEWA ASPHAL ^'AVEMENT•• NO STREET TREES PLANNED FOR PTEMEt"I ADDITIO PER CIVIL ENGINEER /DEVELOPER) ON ALL • • - • EEI_FROfUAGE.�• .. _, . , _ HYDROSEED BARE "NFU" AREAS •. -• - •• - •. _ ..._ , SEEQ MIX INDICATED IN SCHEDULE BROKEN BRANDIES 0•T IC ) NCWIE[0 mar If ,`�� 50551E RIIODOOENOROH ' '� IN AN UPRIOM P05.11011 I iIIIIIIIIIIi) t 17 ?)1 OFETXUPOUIVP ST ,I, .5, 4• \, . \\ RECORDING NO. PORTION OF: &E. 1/4 OF THE N,E, /4, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN RHODODENDRON PLANTING .4 .4. •4 N• .1, .I. SET BASE Or TRUNK Y -N' mom MAN Sim Or GRADE O NOT CWT/ A' MN. us MULCH LAYER TO SLOPE AWAY FROM STEM UNOISTURBEO •AOTDLI, BEATIFY soots • BOTTOM or PLANING PIT. 4• -G' INEUNO MOUND OF COMPSCTCO 1011550 A. AI many IOCAiIONS OR W A SW OLE 1 may 574 SHALL SC USED TO MOUNT lHRUG. LOOP A SOrT OE MOUND STEM VE MO STARE TO SECURE, YET HO RANI SC BALE CO MOVE 2, ONOROUOALYEFORWATSEEN' SOANINO IMMEDATLIY FCR PLANTING REPLACEMENT PLANTING AREA 4 5,390 S.F. VOLUME /PAGE I• N. 'I• N. •I' .4, 4 SHREDDED, AGO MULCT/ 3' DEEP FOR PERENNIALS, FOR GROUND COVERS. ♦ KEEP PUNTS MOOT ANC SHADED UNBL PLANTING. ♦ PLANT ORDINDCOYER AND PERCNNMLS IML ANO A GAME. A SOIL TO BE WELL CULTAAIED 10 A MINIMUM DEPTH or 5'. 4 IN CLAY SOIL WORK IN SPOOL AND ORGMIIC COMPOST. ♦ N 540 WORN N TOPSIR- ORSOIC COMPOST AND ACED WNURE. SEE SPECS. FOR DETAILS. GROUNDCOVER PLANTING r iOdFi cn� '.' , .. ;•R••'.i( &�i�rGiL°a`!wr¢ROPOSED �> t •A.„. o/o'�j "r ' ., " "ISMI " l iZo.`O it • - TORMWATERVA ` 1 C 11 1 '` 1 E3� : �':'.. --''- 21, 5.it, . , G,- 'L .••, i:,LCA . ai i iz ••'> T",�" S I, t . �. .. ,: ^SI. .;F - ° ^•aw tlOjL�YL ir1YEl.-- .- �'.•.��•A�•IAt!nwtl�Y AREA OF FUTURE HOMESITE) REP PLAN 2,375 EX. ,STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED. l SEE CIVIL. PLANS AREA OF FUTURE • HOMESITE-. REPLACEMENT PLANTING AREA 2 732 S.F. y'�� \ (1.015 J Ali ■ AR EA • OF PPq ail • i` v A FUTURE Vr + AN HOMESITE-N ti `;; O 4. CEMENT LNG AREA S.F. AREA OF UTURE MESITE R PLACEM NT PL NTING AREA 6 I 72 S.F. 1 RERLACEMENT I PLA TING AEA 5 i 255 S.F. ' I 1 1 ), �ARA OF.' F1uTURE HOMESITE- SILT FENCE (BY OTHERS, TYP.) S EX. TREES TO REMAIN, , TYP. EW WATER ' METER'BOXE PROP ED DRIVEWAY 0 1 126 122 1, ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO 111E CUACLINES ESTABLISHED BY THE MERMAN NURSERNEN'S ASSOCIATION FOR M0 AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. 2. ALL OEFECTNE OR DEAD PLANT USERS SHALL BE REPLACED WITHIN ONE CROWING SEASON FROM ME ME OF INSTALLATION. ALL PLANTS 5WL1. BE UNDER A 1 -YEAR NARROW? STARTING AT THE DATE OF SUBSINITW. COMPLETION. B DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION IS DURING THE TIME PERIOD BETWEEN JANUARY 10 MACH, THE ONE TEAR wARRANIY SHALL EXTEND FOR AN ADOPMML B MONTHS. 3. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD LOCATE ALL VIM LINES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. THE USE OF OR -SPE UTRIIY PUNS AS A PART OF THIS CONTRACT ARE AVAILABLE FOR RENEW IN THE CONSTRUCTION ON -OTC DIRGE. 4. ALL PWIIS SNAIL BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED OR CONTAINER CROWN AS SP004100. NO CONTAINER GROAN STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IT 0 6 DEEMED TO OE ROT •BOND, ALL PLASTIC RODS WRAPPING AMBITS SHALL SE RDIDHC NO BABE-ROOT STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED. 5. All PLANTS SHALL BE FROM ESTABLISHED NURSERIES MIN A 250 MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT SITE B DESIRED NURSERY STOCK 15 NOT AVOWAL WMMH THIS ZONE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT OLMNIITY, SIZE, ETC. THEN PUNTS MAY BE SECURED FROM OUTSIDE THE REGION AIM POOR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM MC LANDSCAPE MCMECT OF RECORD. 6. ALL PLAINTS SHALL MEET ME MWILOW SIZE INTIMATED ON ME PLO. ONE PUNT FROM EACH GROUPING SHALL GC LMEIEO NOIEMIBIG WE PROPER BOTANICAL NAME AND VOL REMOVE TAGS ATER SUBMITS. COMPLETION. 7. ALL PLANTS SNAIL SE SPRAYED VIA M ANTI- GESSOAAT WORM 24 HOURS AFTER NSTALLATON AND AT ME BEGINNING OF MGR FIRST WNIER, UNLESS CONDITIONS O NOT REORRE AN APPLICATION. O. ALL PUNTS SHAH BE INSTALLED PER THE PLANTING OETALS. INC UNGSCME CONTRACTOR MAY PROPOSE ALTERNATE TREE STING DEALS FOR RCM ALA MPROIAL O. ALL PLANTS SNAIL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY DURING ME FIRST 24 HOURS WTER INSTALLATION. MUNROE CECP WA/CRIIO FOR THE WANT THREE RATS IF PLANTED DURINO A HOI/DROUCIII PERIOD. 10. STOCKPILE POURS N A SIMOY LOCATOR, EMBEOOEO IN SAWDUST, BARK, OR MULCH. STOCKPILE LOCATION SHALL BE NEAR A WATER SOURCE. WATER PLANTS AT LEAST ONCE A IT TO MANIAS HEALTHY PLOTS, II. A PRE - EMERGENT HEROINE SHALL BE APPUED TO ALL PANTING AREAS, ME HERBICIDE SHALL BE SURISN A5. TARN -MIXED rim ROUNDUP AT A RATE OF 4 QUARTS PER ACRE. ADHERE SO ALL MANUFACTURER'S ONECONS AND EMIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. DO NOT APPLY ON A DAY WITH WIND SPEED ERCEEDNG 5 M.P.H., MEASURED AT THE NUKES! ARPORT. 0 T APPL jO STREAM BUFFER AREA OR SITE ZONES THAT E,2 T TYPE TO BE SELECTED B THE LAADSC4ON RACIORR MD IN WNTNO TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 13. ALL PUNDNO BEDS SHALL LIVE A 2' DEEP LATER Of MEOMM -SEED OECORATNE W000 BARN MULCH. BARK SHALL BE GROUND NOT SHREDDED. RARE PUNTING BEDS 5140004 PROS 10 5UB51ANI111 COMPLETION. I4. INSTALL PLANTS DURSO FAVORABLE WEATHER MD WITHIN SEASONAL PUNTING UMRAIIONS, ROWERHG FRUIT TREES MO HAVE TO BE DUG AFTER 3 CONSECUfiE NIGHTS OF TEMPERATURES LOWER ALAN 45' IN THE FALL OR AS DETERMINED DT ME LOCAL NURSERT. 15. PROVIDE NEW IMPORTED TOPSOIL TO BE USED FER RE PUNTING Or G OMOML TREES MD SHRUBS. PRONG A 1' DEEP LAYER OF IMPORTED TOPSOIL AT ALL CROUNOCOVDL MEAS. 16. THE FOLLOANG FERIIBER (BY D.I. URNS, 1-600-787-3,702) SILALL BE SPATES 'BEST TABS' 20 -10 -S CONTROLLED RELEASE FERIEJZER 1 CAL SHRUB • { I) 21 -ERAS TABLET 5 GAL SHRUB • 3 21 -GRAM TABLETS 2' CAL. TREE • 6 21 -GRAM TAOET PLACE EQUALLY IN PUNTING PIT. AS AN OPTION FEROUZER PACKETS MAR ALSO BE USED. 17. ADD WATER ABSORBENT SOIL POLYMERS TO ALL TREE MD SHRUB LOCATIONS. POLYMERS SHALL BE 'SOIL MOIST PLUS 7 -7 -7' AS MANUFACTURED BY JRM CHEMICALS VIG. OR AN APPROVED EOUAL. INSTALL PER MANUFACNRERS REEOMENWIONS. I -000- 962 -1010 I5, DURING ME COURSE Of CONSTRUCTER, If ANY SIGNS Or BEETLE NTESIAT01 IS EYSEM, REPORT ANT SWINGS 10 CHAD PIGILPS Al ME DEPT. OF AGNOULNRAL READ OFFICE IN Watt WMHINGION. (550)- 350 -1256 C• 6191(481 DESIGN4.CON•SULTANZ44 ASPEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING SEATTLE • PORTLAND ASPEN DESIGN GROUP 3748 257TH AVENUE S.E. I WA 9 (425 313 -3195 (FA )) LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENT PLAN SCALE; I • 30.0 ill] ILL 1111�II1 HII H 1 E i i VIII li IMAI JTAil 111111 I 111 %1 , WESTCOTi'R • '' EI,K,4„ .. .: I IIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111IIIII II II II1111111 IVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIIIEMIT)I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111 )III11111))IIIIIIIIIIIII SHEET NUMBER L.12 U 0 FEBRUARY 22, 2002 NO. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE STATUS COMMENTS NO, BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE STATUS COMMENTS N0, BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE STATUS COMMENTS NO, BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE STATUS COMMENTS NO. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE STATUS COMMENTS ALNUB RUBRA RETAIN • 21 ALNUB RUBRA RV ALDER RETAIN 3 TRUNKS 41 ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE HOME SITE 61 RED ALDER RETAIN • PRUNUS 8P. CHERRY k bymtv°- ----- - - -1 RETAIN • ALNUS RUBRA REMOVE • 22 ALNUSRUBRA RED ALDER RETAIN • 42 ACERMACROPHYLLUM REMOVE HOME SITE 02 RED ALDER REMOVE DRIVEWAY 777777 APPLE RETAIN 2TRUNKB ACER MACROPHYLLUM PHYL RETAIN DEAD 23 ALNUB RUBRA ED R ALDER RETAIN 43 ACER MACROPHYLLUM LUM EMOVE HOME SITE 83 BIO -LEAF LE REMOVE REMOV DRIVEWAY RNEWA PRUNUS P U 8 flUN 8 P. CHERRY CH RY REMOVE DRIVEWAY ACERMACROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 24 ALNUBRUBRA RED ALDER RETAIN • 44 ACERMACROPHYLLUM REMOVE HOME SITE 04 RED ALDER REMOVE 3TRUNKS PRUNUS8P, CHERRY RETAIN • ACERMMCROPHYLLUM RETAIN 2TRUNKS 25 ALNUS RUBRA RED ALDER RETAIN • 46 ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE HOME an 86 REO ALDER RETAIN • PRUNUS BP. CHERRY RETAIN • ACERMACROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 20 ALNUS RUBRA RED ALDER REMOVE HOMESITE 48 ACERMACROPHYLLUM REMOVE DRIVEWAY 68 RED ALDER RETAIN ALNUBRUBRA RED ALDER RETAIN • ACERMACROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 27 ALNUSRUBRA RED ALDER REMOVE HOME EIRE 47 ACERMACROPHYLLUM REMOVE DRIVEWAY 07 RED ALDER RETAIN • PRUNUS8P. CHERRY RETAIN • ACER MACROPHYLLUM RETAIN 2 TRUNKS 28 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIO.LEAF MAPLE REMOVE HOME SITE 48 ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE WATER METER 08 RED ALDER REMOVE DRIVEWAY PRUNUS 8P. CHERRY RETAIN • ACERMACROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 29 ALNUS RUBRA REC ALDER REMOVE HOME SITE 49 ACERMACROPHYLLUM LL REMOVE DRIVEWAY 89 RED ALDER REMOVE DRIVEWAY PRUNUS SP. CHERRY REMOVE VAULT LOC. ACERMACROPHYLLUM RETAIN . 30 ACERMACROPHYLLUM BIG LEAF MAPLE RETAIN • 50 ACERMACROPHYLLUM REMOVE UTILITIES 70 RED ALDER REMOVE DRIVEWAY ALNUSRUBRA RED ALDER REMOVE VAULT LOC, ACER MACROPHYLLUM RETAIN 2 TRUNKS 31 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIO•LEAF MAPLE RETAIN • 61 ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE UTILITIES 71 RED ALDER RETAIN • - z ACERMACROPHYLLUM BIG -LEAF MAPLE REMOVE VAULT 1.00. ACER MACROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 32 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIG LEAF MAPLE REMOVE 7 TRUNKS 52 ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE UTILITIES 72 RED ALDER RETAIN • ACER MACROPHYLLUM BKiI.EAF MAPLE REMOVE VAULT LOC. ACER PMCROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 33 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIG LEAF MAPLE L wY E UTILIT ER E ALMS RUBRA RED ALDER REMOVE VAULT LOC. ACER MACROPHYLLUM RETAIN - 34 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIG•LFAF MAPLE RETAIN 4 TRUNKS U ALNUBR 8 - D �� CHERRY RETAIN 2 ALNUB RUBRA RED ALDER REMOVE VAULT LOG. ACER MACROPHYLLUM RETAIN • 35 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIG LEAF MAPLE RETAIN • 66 ALNUB RUBRA • 76 REDALDER RETAIN • ACER MACROPHYLLUM BID•LEAF MAPLE RETAIN • ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE HOME SITE 38 ALNUB RUBRA ALDER REMOVE DEAD lie ALNU9 RUBRA REMOVE • 75 CHERRY RETAIN • ACER MACROPHYLLUM BI(1•LEAF MAPLE RETAIN • ACER MACROPHYLLUM REMOVE HOME SITE 37 ACERMACROPHYLLUM BI OLEO MAPLE REMOVE HOME BITE 67 ANUS RUBM REMOVE T7 CHERRY REMOVE HOME SITE ALNUB RUBRA RED ALDER REMOVE HOMESITE ALNUB RUBRA RETAIN 3B ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIG MAPLE RETAIN 75 CHERRY REMOVE HOME 817E PRUNUS 8P. CHERRY RETAIN 69 ALNUB RUBRA D'ALO RED ALDER 15' REMOVE /2\ HOME SITE — ' ALNUB RUBRA RETAIN 39 ACER MACROPHYLLUM DIG•LEAF MAPLE REMOVE HOME SITE 79 CHERRY REMOVE HOME BITE 7777 APPLE RETAIN 2 TRUNKS ALNUB RUBRA RETAIN - 40 ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIC•LEAF MAPLE REMOVE HOME SITE 80 ALNUB RUBRA RED ALDER 15' REMOVE HOME SITE 00 RED ALDER REMOVE HOME SITE - NOTES . EXISTING TREERETENTIONAND'REMOVAUSCHEDULE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. TREE RETENTION STATISTICS PRE- DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS) EXIST. SIGNIFICANT TREES: AVE. DIA. OF EXIST. TREES: SITE AREA: SIGNIFICANT TREES / ACRE: IPOST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS) SIGNIFICANT TREES RETAINED: EVERGREEN /CONIFER - DECIDUOUS /HARDWOOD - TOTAL SIGNIFICANT TREES RETAINED - AVE. DIA. - TREES RETAINED: EVERGREEN /CONIFER - DECIDUOUS/HARDWOOD AVERAGE DIA. OF RETAINED TREES - SIGNIFICANT TREES / ACRE: 22 EVERGREEN /CONIFER (4" MIN. DIA.) - 0 DECIDUOUS /HARDWOOD (4' MW. DIA.) - 99 TOTAL SIGNIFICANT TREES - 99 EVERGREEN /CONIFER (4' MIN. DIA.) - 0 DECIDUOUS/HARDWOOD (4" MIN. DIA.) - 18" AVERAGE DIAMETER OF EXIST. TREES - 18" 3.03 ACRES 33 TREES PER ACRE N/A IB I8 NUMBER OF TREES RED. FOR REPLACEMENT PLANT.: 215 TREES NUMBER OF NEW DECIDUOUS TREES: 106 TREES NUMBER OF NEW EVERGREEN TREES, 109 TREES (SEE SHEET L2.0 FOR PROPOSED REPLACEMENT PLANTING) NARRATIVE THE EXISTING SITE IS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF A MIX OF DECIDUOUS TREES, SPECIFICALLY RED ALDER, BIG -LEAF MAPLE, CHERRY TREES AND A COUPLE OF APPLE TREES. THERE WAS NOT ANY SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE OF DISEASE WHICH WOULD BE DETRI- MENTAL TO THE PROJECT SITE, HOWEVER A BOTANIST OR FOREST MANAGEMENT FIRM MAY BE BETTER ABLE TO DETECT ANY DISEASE. SOME OF THE TREES EXHIBITED SIGNS OF WIND STORM OR ICE STORM DAMAGE. THERE WERE SOME BROKEN LIMBS, TREES TOPPED, ETC. BUT DAMAGE WHICH IS TYPICAL FOR TREES CROWING IN WESTERN WASHINGTON. ALL OF THE TREES ARE PROJECTED TO LOVE WELL BEYOND THE NEXT TEN YEARS WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF SOME OF THE URGER ALDER TREES, THE ALDER TREE HAS A MAXIMUM LIFE EXPECTANCY OF 100 YEARS. AN ALDER TREE W/ AN 16" GIRTH IS EQUAL TO 60 YEARS OLD. THE LARGEST ALDER ON THIS PROJECT SITE IS 27" IN GIRTH (SINGLE TRUNK), WHICH WOULD EQUATE TO 90 YEARS OLD. South 135t NEW F.H© 0 1. d e 43rd Avenue South A W17.1 iik; II aft, 51111"1511rMok GRAPHIC LEGEND EXISTING TREE TO LIE ED. STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED. SEE CIVIL PLANS AREA OF FUTURE HOMESITE- NEW CURB CON IAVEMENT••= L 1161 '•'I' 20 DESIGN INTENT THE GOAL FOR THIS SITE WAS TO RETAIN AS MANY OF THE EXISTING TREE; AS POSSIBLE WITH A HIGHER EMPHASIS OF TREES THAT WERE CROWNS IN CLUSTERS, LOCATED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO THE STREAM DUFFEN PROVIDED PARTNL WINO BREAKS AND /OR SUMMER SHADING. TREES WERE DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL DUE TO THE FOLLOWING: NEW DRNEWAY DEYCLOPIJENI GRADING OPERATIONS AREA OF NEW HOMO DEAD OR DISEASED UTILITY LINES /EASEIAENIS TEMPORARY CONST: ACTION ENTRANCE AREA OF PROPOSE); CT'ENTION POND Street EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE NLMBER NEW CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ALL NEW SITE WORK, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY ON THIS SHEET / / ASPHALT PAVEMENT ADDITION NEW CONCRETE CURD NEW 6.0' SIDEWALK 35.0' WIDE STREAM BUFFER VIREAM 35.0' WIDE STREAM BUFFER GEOTECHNICAL DUFFER coy OTHERS) / TEMPORARY -• CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, SEE/ CIVIL PLANS/ / / Tv AR (4' ‘.v:KNOINEMINEAMMISIMMERMIff rnmces TT RECORDING NO, 1 11111 I , 111{1111111 II11 J1 .11 '1!11 IIIILII 1 III` HV 111 1 111 m,� 1 u 11 2 1 . 11 1' ,L.11 .....41 i'1' III I _, � 5I 111 111 1 I � 11 I •WCSTE: U. r . 1 Ml L EI IL Ol B • A X U S P C E L I 5 I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I I J I I I I I111111I I I I1111) 1111111111 111111111) 1111I111111111I1111) 11111I11111111I111111111I111111111I I I I I � I I I II111111111I11111111'ID 1I VOLUME /PAGE PORTION OF: S.E. 1/4 OF THE N.E. 1/4, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN \ \\• 1 \ '� \ `•\ � I \ ED DRIVEWAY J 126 122 118 N6 / 1: 12 C PLANJNQTESr TREE RETENTION NOTES I. NO PERSON SHALL CONDUCT ANY CLEARINO OF VEGETATION WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A TREE CLEATING PERMIT ON A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA DIRECTOR, 2. NO TREE REMOVAL SHALL BE ALLOWED PRIOR TO THE CITY OF TUK TENTION A P AID AL OF A CRAZING PERMIT CONSISTENT WITH TREE 3. PRIOR TO CLEARING FOR A PROJECT ACTION TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE FLAOGED, USING NIGHTLY VISIBLE RIBBON. 4. PRIOR TO GRADING ryry1ILE A PROJECT ACTION AND THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, A TEMPORARY CHAIN LINK FENCE OR PLASTIC NET FENCE (ORANGE) SHALL BE mSEO TO IDENTIFY THE PROTECTED AREA or HE � G H T OF SUCH AN FENCI F - ALL OE ACCORDING TO THE SON TOPOGRAPHIC AND VEGETA/ 'OIRIIDONS OF THE SITE TO PROVDE CLEAR VISUAL DELINEATION • THE PROTECTED AREA. THE SIZE OF THE PROTECTED AREA MOUND THE TREE SHALL BE EQUAL TO ONE FOOT MATER FOR EACH INCH OF TREE TRUNK OMMETER MEASURED FOUR TEET MOVE THE GROUND. 5. ALL VEGETATION BELOW THE TREE UNDERSTORY /DRIPUNE SHALL BE RETAINED. IF REMOVAL I5 NECESSARY, METHODS THAT ARE IION- DAMAGING TO THE TREE SHALL BE USED AND VEGETATION REPLACED WITH THE TREE UNDERSTOA'. 0. THE TIMINO AND METHODS USED FOR VEGETATION REMOVED SMALL BE SUCH THAT IMPACTS TO PROTECTED VEGETATION, FISHERIES, WILDLIFE AND THE ADJACENT STREAM BUFFER ZONE ARE 4211412ED. WITH THE TREE UNDERSTORY. 7. THE TREE CLEARING PERMIT IS VALID FOR A PERIOD OF ISO DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PERMIT APPROAVAL /ISSUANCE. S. Al NO TIME DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL THE FOLLOWINJ BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE (NOTE NO. 41. A. IMPERVIOUS AREAS, FILL. EXCAVATION OR STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS B. GRADE LEVEL CHANGES. EXCEPT IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS USING PERMEABLE MATERIALS ME DETERMINED BY A LICENSED MBORIST TO BE NON- DETRIMENTAL TO THE TREE'S ROOT SYSTEM. P. ALTERNATNE OR ADDITIONAL PROTECTION MEASURES MAY BE PROPOSED AND USED IF DETERMINES BR THE DIRECTOR TO PROVIDE EQUAL OR GREATER PROTECTION FOR TREES DESIGNATED TO BE RETAINED. 10. ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE UFE OF THE PROJECT. 11. ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES SHALL BE PRUNED AND TRIMMED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION TO PREVENT PRIMARY LIMB FAILURE. SNIS REQUIREMENT SMALL NOT BE INTERPRETED TO ALLOW THE FOLLOWING: A. TOPPING OF PRIMARY STEMS B. PRUNINO THAT RESULTS IN THE LOSS OF 205 OF VEGETATIVE MASS C. CUTTING OF MAJOR ROOTS, EXCEPT IN THE PREPARATION FOR TRANSPLANTATION OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY AND /OR M ACCEPTABLE BY A LICENSED GRIST. 12. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DEAD, DISEASED OR DAMAGED TREES SPECIFICALLY ROAMED TO PROVIDE WILDUFE HABITAT, OTHER • DAMAGED, DEAD OR STOLEN PUNTS SHALL BE REPLACES WITHIN 3 MONTHS OR DURING THE NEXT PLANTING SEASON IF THE LOSS DOES NM OCCUR DURING THE RANTING SEASON. LDESIGNCONSINTAMEMA ASPEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING SEATTLE • PORTLAND ASPEN DESIGN GROUP 3745 257TH AVENUE S.E. I 8029 I SSAQUAH, WA 9(( (425) 313 -3195 (FAX) TREE RETENTION PLAN SCALE: 1 - 30.0 NORTH GR ( A T 0 11 h LE I ' RECT'..' 2 ( 21103 I UKWILA P ANEW.'/ /CF11As I- Z w Z ^ 2 E..1 - a0 • J o w z w C w .�g I- V/ SHEET NUMBER L1.0 FEBRUARY 22, 2002 rY ' rot-a/ o 20040212900003 City of Tukwila SHORT PLAT Na, L01 -033 DECLARATION • KNOW HERESY MKS NSHORT SLI IONTHE EOF.PURSUWE MOM PINrtSES INCONSISTENT.NH7H if REUSE DIEETNr FOfT Pi BUC'ROATRIMY AU1V7V.PtF: ALSO.771E RNQNT 1D 1WfE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES Fare: CUTS AND FILLS .UPON THE WTS MO. TRACTS SHOWN ON" 77115• PLAT NV 771E ORIGIN4L REASOAWILE GIS IAA"' OF SAO STRttra.'SHOWN THEREON 7HE. WATER LINES ARE ONrIED BY *1ER DISTRICT 125 AND THE SEVER LWES ARE OWNED BY IfAL WE DISTRICT.. THIS DEDICATION OF THE PROPOSED ROADWAYS AND mune IS SUBJECT 70 7HEBR COMWL770N -BY THE DEVELOPER AND 7HE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL BY 7HE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR THAT THEY HOVE BEEN COMPLETED 70 CITY STANp4R05 NE AND ALL OF OUR SUCCESSORS WANE ALL CLAIMS MR DANCES AG4INST ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ARISING FROM 7HE CONS7RUCfl0N AND 4WMENANCE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHIN THE SUBDMSION. (17.04.060 E1.2) THE DETENTION TRACT IS DEDICATED 7D THE CITY OF TUKW/LA UPON RECORDING OF THIS SUBDMSION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAW SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS • DRAY OF - a... %Q' ' 2004. BEN2A: G0fut•ibeY (Print Name) (Print Name) (Signature) (Signature) STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me 3 .?- -' O CkaklNdr_ to me known to be the ' dividual who excuted the fo oing instrument and acknowledged that p signed the some aslher voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my_ hand and official seal this 30 441 day of S y , c a . r�v� A O 0 L. Q 9a Tp /I II Signature: el 0C Jfr71 at baraA MTh S# OA t? pSP�Y �e Sof commissioned. Title' NO'*cir Ut 6.43 G M appointment expires: 3 a9 -0 ( 5m u _. #1 ' u PU !. STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personal' appeared before me to me known to be the individual who excuted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the some as hie /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of R E CONFOREED COPY file 20040212900003 Man: 96." Signature: Name of commissioned: Title. My appointment expires• Supt. of Records t M st of City of Tukwila Approvals: CITY TREASURER'S. CERTIFICATE There 'me no delinquent. special..aseseemen :ennd.alI'.spocla: menu en : aiLp at tAhe prenerty that to ;dedicat d ae:.dreetr:. ensue • or fbr'>'other public um an paid in full arrrowd ar Chair, Shat Subdivision Committee G COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFI I certify that a • •perty taxes are .paid and that a • - •osit has been made In sufficlen a •unt to pay the taxes for - fol owing year that there are no dellnq •t special assess certified to this office for collection: and the • I spacio • easements on any property herein dedicated as at -- • eys, of for other public use are paid in full. Examined and approved this day De p Ing County Treasurer King County Treasurer KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Examined and approved this . day of Sco+f Noble- Deputy Assessor Account Number 2/0 13 20- 0150 , 2024.- LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, JAMES 0. CRONES; REGISTERED AS A LAND SURVEYOR BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT iS BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN, CONDUCTED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT 7HE DISTANCES COURSES, AND ANGLES ARE SHOWN THEREON CORRECTLY; AND MAT MONUMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE MONUMENTS APPROVED FOR SETTING AT A U7ER L47E FIVE BEEN SET AND LOT CORNERS STAKED ON THE GROUND AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAT. Certifcate No. •.29.537 Date: ....f.- .10 -04 LEGAL DESCRIPTION :: VERTICAL DATUM SUBDIVISON NOTES :: LOT AREAS: TOTAL PLAT: 132,794 SQ. FT. &, 3.05 ACRES& TRACT A: 42,751 SO. FT• &, 0.98 ACRES& LOT 1: 26,070 50. FT. &, 0.60 ACRES& LOT 2: 14,326 S0. FT &, 0.33 ACRES& LOT 3: 7,481 S0. F7: &, 0.17 ACRES& LOT 4 7,072 S0. FT. &, 0.16 ACRES& LOT 5: 6,530 S0. PT. &, 0.15 ACRES& LOT 6: 6,515 SQ. PT. &, 0.15 ACRES& LOT 7: 7,080 SQ. FT. &, . 0.16 ACRES& LOT 8: 9,003 S0. FT. &, 0.21 ACRES& DETEM70N TRACT 5,967 S0. FT.t 0.14 ACRES& 2.808 MOTH AVE SE: KENT, WA 98042 (425) 432 -5930 I I IIIIIIjit 1 1 1 1 1 IIl 1 1 1 I i lIIII '1.LI,Ii l ( llllll . IIIII�I 1 1 1 II ,. IIIilllH l;llllllllllillll111111llll • Inch 1,m 1 2 3 4 ;c " 5 6 AV£STCOTF r: . . • CRONES & ASSOC. LAND SURVEYORS 5 I L 11111 A I L 1111111 E Iiiiihn1 L 0 11111111111111111111111111111111 6 11. 1.6 0L Ie I i111111111 11 I 1 i" I Ic I L WT i 1111 11 11111111 1111/1111 1111/1111 1/111111 111111111 111111111 111111111111111111 ,a --r . , .. «eo••*r... _ ... , . ,- this DWN. BY AILS /KMB /GRA CHKD. BY EVW /BGw DATE AUGUST, 2000 REVISED 1/26/04 JOB NO. SARAD - 1A2 SHORT RATING SHEET f -� ,.-:OF 3 TAX LOT NO. 'A1390 - 0150• THAT PORITON OF TRACT 19,. FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING 70' 7HAE'PL47. REGOiDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGES) 95. RECOR05.OF 109; COMMY:.. WAS INCTO , LYNVG_ & STERLY OF F.J. FVENI OVIE LIIITIk8tr`-AVENUE. sount'4rcomm & INKING cour ? screw i COhrrr: GwHSE NO. 241828) :, .BASS ' QP`:�itC8II .9 THAEltirkorim WlS Ft>AF Ti Ogoi es; ,rwoML� ANN: • Y. :IMILSUrEIMWS.REl nkS .. . NI7N A 2` 1lEC1E1 . G15 .7P - AMS7RUAEIUI 8Y' MAME METHODS; AND MEET OR EXCEED ACCURICY STANDARDS OF' i:20,00Q 2 COPYRMrHT BY CRONES' 3: ASSOCATES,' LAND. SURVEYORS BENCHMARK: USED. FOR VE1T71CAL. DATUM IS THE WEST AIM OF THE SANITARY' SETTER •MANHOLE. ON SOWN 134T71 STREET FEAR THE SOUTHERLY CORNER•OF TRACT 6; IN FOS7ORL4: GARDEN TRACT' VOL. 9/95; SAID: MANHOLE BEING 77ED 70 ARMY CORPS BENCH PPGD 6.834 IN 1985 BY DAVID EVANS & ASSOC. ELEYA17ON = 15.09 FEET MEAN SEA LEVEL (M5L) 1. ALL. EXISTING STRUCTURES ON SITE ARE TO BE REMOVED BEFORE RECORDING OF THIS SUBDMSION. 2. ALL. BUILDINGS DOWNSPOUTS, FOOTING DRAINS, AND DRAINS FROM ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES SUCH AS PATIOS AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO 171E PERMANENT STORM DRAIN OUTLET AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED' CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ON FILE WiTH THE CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THIS PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPUCATTON FOR ANY BUILDING PERMIT 4. THE DEMON TRACT iS DEDICATED TO THE CRY OF TUKWILA WITH THE RECORDING- OF THIS SUBDMSION. 5. THIS SUBDMSION SHALL COMPLY WITH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORTS BY: KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES INC. DATED FEBRUARY 20, 2001 AND AUGUST 9, 2002 AND SUBSEQUENT GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS. 6. NO RUNOFF, INCLUDING DOWNSPOUTS, SHALL BE INF7LIRATED INTO THE GROUND THROUGH •'DRY YETIS" OR PERFORATED INF7L7RA71ON PIPES AND WENCHES. 7. INOMDUAL HOUSE FOUNLATiONS AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL PROVIDE A SPECIFIC GEO7ECHNICAL ASSESSMENT, VIR71 FINAL DESIGN RECOMMENDA7TONS. 8. INSTALLATION OF RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE HOMES TO BE BUILT ON LOTS 4 AND 6, PER CiTY OF TUKWILA FIRE MARSHALL. 9. AN CARD/ Y/DED /N)FA:EJ T /N r&#e T ';4" TD [.8T1 / TM ?OULN Ili /#flu's /Ylir /s NNizeQY GaApvrEeD CAPON 77P AZEGOA:D /N6 die T.'Y /S s ua b,Y/J /eM. RECORDING NO. PORTION OF s.* 1/4 of . N.B. 1/4, S. 15- . • T. 2311- R 4E W M ll imusevr alinisrlesen � '' e a i r T PAE .CITY ITI - �. • TMCS ` A M lg iF l wllhmHll �'SiI aIMS' . a �ar nr+e�a rel� rsT:a! ArL :rlr s:IP1 r •Attirmammna;ar w>rW' , AstJllr"irallietYrlem Att:F E'lets .'"' ' rr arioearet+taa attune MIN . AlICIIINEWAIWCANS, EIMPRIENERNEIRE PURPOSE OF .'S611110. SIAIONSIOM AMO IHERZPRONER ISMEN EUEik' NO. IVIES, Ott laden Or Tiarmis14S9dIi,arearma CURRENT art .POR:7613III0IEIAA: AllE:7ELEWSIII ME" Oft MICE sows: at. FORAMEN PURPOSES SNOW IIEWAf1FDi 6PONANY: LOT' UNLESS. . �9 CONDIA'TATTNT ED 70A RESTRICTIONS :: NO LOT OR PORTION OF A LOT IN 7HA5 PLAT SHALL: BE DIVIDED .MO SOLD OR RESOLD OR OWNERSHIP CH IGEO' OR TRANSFERRED IW#EREY THE OWNERSHIP OR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAT SHALL BE LESS THAN 771E AREA REQUIRED FOR 7HE USE DISTRICT IN WHICH LOCATED. 5 LOT I - 166.9' LOT 2 - 56.4' . LOT 3 - 56.9' LOT 4 - 5&4' LOT 5 -65.8' LOT 6 - 66.1' LOT 7 - 46.43' LOT 8 - 95.7' MEAN LOT WIDTHS: VISIONS VICINITY MAP NOT 7O SCALE VOL. /PAGE SHORT PLAT FOR SARA DEVELOPMENT W CD J City of Tukwila SHORT PLAT NO. L01 -033 TRACT A / EIO4wrST_ A PORTION OF war . to MOM* MOM ROM ACCORINNO TO 711E Fur DEIMTF RECORDED IN IODINE i OF MATE " PAVE NS. NOME OF EW CdMTY, MNASHIN GID DESCRIBED AS'FDLLONE . MEGIWIN AT' COMER o" Salk AMINO TIE EAST U E.OF SIDLAMCr 291.40. FEE T DE wolf ftls'N'M'ALpIDAIE;S M;fa•/t 1107M/SIZ ISIEZTFEE7 ;`11naleineJne/K li . PE T'V 7PIE scimitar mvict 1cot:93I11K.TE1I :TIE 5519,011` TI MM NV S UT E1&Y MINK 10047 FEET 701 TIE F a' --- A PORTION OF moor to mimic C1 7AlE i ET THE PLAT T1iE O RED r4 VOLUME 9' OF PlA7S► on: Anon, or NEC COMM. INlSMAGTO N DESCRIED AS Rxtows- coatmeictv AT DE ADLDi6VST Ui► OF' SIM : moor Elt.DIMICE SDii'w ALONG THE EAST LIE OF SAD 7MCT. 29t:40'"FLET 1O TOE SOIOlrT CORNER OF SAC MGT 19; 7HENCE AIIb'324d1'W'ALOND 7FE SOUTH' LANE OF SAKI MILT t& 154.48' FEE 70 VIE POW or LE7MININIK'• DEUCE NOT46J9Z ?M2t FLEf:: wers,E 91.99 FEET 771DICE S75'57^'5319' . 3496 FEET; THENCE S34'1t$31I 152LN' FEET 70' DYE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AMt7WE. SOUTH AND' TO A POINT ON A NON - TANGENT CURVE 71,1E RADIUS OF NTMCM BEARS 14562439'E; TWICE ON A 256.48• FOOT RADIAL • CURVE 70 THE LEFT ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN,. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 815'O2" AN ARC LENGTH OF 3693 FEET 70 A. PANT OF TANGENCY; THENCE S41'50 ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 117.78 FEET TD A POT OF CURVE MINCE ON A 470.97 FOOT RADIAL CURVE 10 711E Miff ALONG SAC NORTHEAS7ERLY MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43105' AN ARC LENGTH OF 37.14 FEET 7O THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 19; THENCE S88'3249E ALONG SAC SOUTH LINE; 33.76 FEET TO 711E POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT 70 UTILITY AND PRIVATE DRAEWAY EASEMENTS. LOT 2: A PORTION OF TRACT 19, FOSIORIA GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING 7O THE RAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 95, RECORDS OF KING COUNr . WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 19; THENCE N66'14241' ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 735T71 STREET, 108.47 FEET 10 THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S24'52'0919. 93.05 FEET; THENCE S75'57'5319 54.96 FEET; THENCE 555'185519.. 152.89 FEET 7O THE NORTHEASTERLY AMRGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH AND 1O A POINT ON A NON- TANGENT CURVE THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS N562439Z THENCE ON A 256.48 FOOT RADIAL CURVE 10 THE RIGHT ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13'28'07' AN ARC LENGTH OF 60.29 FEET; THENCE N56 139.87 FEET; THENCE N6708 E. 139.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO UTTUTY AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS. -I•. :, 'k 111111=111Fai 1=1Ww�-Ii.rMK: -i1 Ii Y4 2 M 1M !' �Yb7iL �L�l 111•1•1141Mar-i7 IIMI: h-4 -li4ik t :10/ LOOK TI 1.14.iY -1'1 �S7 iC -1C�] �: r•Y - ii•Y Y �i NEMM iT--q 11111111.. t- 112 6 L7 MM1M[7iZMINE.^?7 -MV2 RPM 1 19 L20 24.00 38.21 24.02 S53'57'16'1./ S21 •E S14•38'42'E _S77•45'22' V IMINM M ., : ip MINIMMINNOVETI ��7 �tT �9!r�i KY -6 �2T �7CY7N�� J A (IIFkl�:E<rS CI�1Af -A EkT7i1 ]F3111�iY� -L IMINDCMMIONWPMIIIMMEN EASD4ENT UNE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING NNW �]F31F•,'3:1CI7 �1�t7�F;7 EASEMENT' CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS 43RD AVENUE S. SUBDIVISION EASEMENT DETAIL: 24' Y • DISSENT 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT . . , ..wMt..: /.U•x:WtL:trr• + F +1MMX7gA'»/4NY.M�N'�WlRYiT•'•?7 .. .+vf.,1.:...•� LOT 8 08 Lit. L30 -\._ f•�t, .. a... n.. k::. :.f, ...f...i�::ll .. �.,Yi).+..: YG �'_ �^� =1� REVISED LEGAL ' DESCRIPTIONS :: A • POR/1ON OF TRACT 19. FOS7OWM GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING ' TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN voila& 9 OF PtA7S; TUJE 966 RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, MASIATNGRIN; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMEND AT Mir , mitiviir Comer OF SID 7Tar ilVIIEJeCE N8674241Y ALONG THE SOUTHERLY M INN Or SONVO ant SME SI TOS'41'll; 13047 FEET 70 DE POINT OF 100111111111V 00EI E• M • S3:O1 FEE7:'71@KE 86074 118.55 FEE 70 THE E7 molar 1 frank AL,.W. RN•AAD',TD Mir . 01d'A NON- 7ANope coma : 71E rwaus ' or ..ror, - _r inr E:'= ' ar.4.0 1tovor mom. crmew 7M.ntrLIFT moicSID'1 .R'tertaiacu iff- *AcmoirlgE OF T432W at AIic ODOM Or IEt t - FEET;. AIEet 13087 i@T 7D:7T!E FOdT OF LIEGINNIN . SUEAEr >Q • U1iltT GRAD FrN11gE MOs 24' WIDE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT 6‘. \ L27 ' r; , , ,dr si Tei er rItz>lifll ili is 'r.' AYE .- -, filitIgEr.1101Nrromr or misrowliNCE 31 7a'4't1U AIDA0r'/�It E 1'i'k1E'EE`nNIt' INDA HAKE rai"!/'AM E- " t0R7C'FEET 717 TIC 3Ql1INDlr WARM OF 500111 13301' SWIM, wierctsivitorr ALONE' SAD SOLRIENLY WOK MOO run TIEYOE SIN7434't :40116 SID SNIDERY MYfi714 MI5 FEET 70 DIE POET OF NEONNE suluar 70 unto' AND P RIVE 0111MINY EASEMENTS. A PORTION.OF'7RACT 19, FOSTO IA GARDEN DAC7S ACCORDING 70 71E PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 op PLATS; RAGE 95 RECORDS' OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS• COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 19; 71ENCE N66'1424 W AL•VG 71dE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 135711 STREET, 108.47 FEET;. THENCE S6708411% 139.47 FEET; THENCE N32 09'W, 5101 FEET 70 THE PANT OF BEGIN l THENCE S6024'56'W 118.55 FEET TO THE EASTERLY AWRGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH AND 7O A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS NI847522Z THENCE ON A 258.48 FOOT RADIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'02'47" AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.54 FEET 70 A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE 70128'092 ALONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID. 43RD AVENUE SOUTH, 44.04 FEET; THENCE N6014'191" 65.98 FEEL THENCE S32'OS'O9E 65.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO A PRIVATE SERVICE EASEMENT. LQT 6.• A POR TON OF TRACT 19. FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 95, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 19; THENCE N66'14241V ALONG 771E SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 135771 STREET. 147.12 FEET; THENCE 144642'591Y ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN, 39.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTINUING THENCE N45'42'59 - I ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN, 68.97 FEET THENCE S60'14'1919 90.41 FEET; THENCE S32 65.98 FEET,• THENCE N6026497: 106.70 FEET TO 77E POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO U7ML?Y AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS. 70' P EASEMENT FOR SERVCE TO LOT 6 1Rr • 24' EDE DRIVEW EASEMENT 10' ASEMENT FOR SERVICE TO LOT 4 LAND SURVEYORS Ill (111 a It .l, III l Ili I I II I ` ll III I I III I 11 { ICI I I 2f ili ill { I II � 3`• I t '. l I .III I '4 1III ) . , ill ,; I III II I 5I I II I III II I 6 l AVE STCO1D • . Sll Olt Ell Zll Olt Olt i ld IL ld l5 lb IE lZ ll WOl n nnlnn I nni I nnI nnJ unI nnlnn L I ° nnI nnI unlun uuI L I RECORDING NO. PORTION OF g•$- 1 /4 of N.S. 1 /4, S. i T. 23N R. 4E W.M. r _ i. mow F*. /m1 ! 711111!' X! ro FIAT 11 taco � MI VOLUMEM E114" 1 .- .. 16M" CF. sffic cop". C Ogialgo AS Ftr EM 01.1 • -j I t4�{�'AL TIE • iiliii°- meow 411 IS>N!'Jlr'kiralR' - 11171EO 6E' 1O 1IIE10EANSOIVI I0A7UL n .; T 50F'lti1M AID'!' M111101K 77.01 FEETI: DIEttE NoitRI'Tea 177TH! ' TO' we mitt C • __-rf .• maw TO A EllMllif mimeo: ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. KD• BY- VOL. /PAGE • A'l,T�f OF 7MICT 10.. FORM* OMEN 7A1C1S A=0101111t 7O DE PLAT THEREOF RV:0 D AN VOLUME 90F NAM F1UiE Oft RECORDS: OF NAB G H7) IOISM N TOAt OESCIMED AS MERE: COMMENCING AT IFE NOIPDEASr CONAIST OF SAID 71MCT 1* DEICE Mk67424'W ALOUD 71E SOU77 Y AMRGU OF SOUTH 135TH SYR= 14712 FffJ; THENCE N45'42 ALONG SOD SOUTHERLY MARGE 13755 FEET 10 7HE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE S774822'W' 121M84 FEET 10 THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH; 77EKE No17809E ALM° SAD EASTERLY AM/KIN, 14204 FEET. DEUCE N0102'40Z 1&53 FLIT 70 711E WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAUDI 135771 S7REE7 I ENCE SOI'S3'18'W' ALONG SAC WESTERLY !MRM:IN, 14.73 FTET) MOVE $4542'59'E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MMRGIN•OF SAC SOUTH 13501 STRUT, 144.29 FEET 70 THE POINT OF GOMM SUBJECT 70 A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT: QjFN77ON TRACT (PUNIC): A PORTION OF TRACT 19, FOS7ORM GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING 10 THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 O PLATS, PAGE 95. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT 771E NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 7RACT 19; THENCE N66'142414' ALONG 711E SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 135771 STREET, 147.12 FEET, THENCE N454259'W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN,, 281.85 FEET; THENCE N05'53'18E ALONG SAC WESTERLY MARGIN, 14.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTINING THENCE N06 ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 193.80 FEET 70 THE SOUTHWESTERLY APRON OF 42ND AVENUE SOUTH; 7HHENCE N2717'271Y ALONG SAID SOUTIMESTERLY MARGIN, 65.40 FEET 70 THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE 50128'09V ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 250.20 FELT; •THENCE N89'0240T 18.53 FEET 70 THE POINT OF BEGINNING. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 z w 1m REVISED 1/26/04 sr „V :ti ,: .�; w a. - 1 t�' NO.. RADIUS LIBYG7f ; DELTA Iti 470.97' 37.14' 4'3105' 256.48' 36.93' 8•15'02" 256.48' 60.29' 13'28'07' 256.48' 65.11 • 143216' 256.48' 31.54' 702'47" ,.ti:lr ;l.:.: 7; .•.a>71 :tTe rTSt 7- wM�•.s y�WR'LCL c?'S:w, ^.M»�:. ';. - e. iQ•'Oy°.rPregRVma!mr City of Tukwila SHORT PLAT NO. L01 - 033 A2�� 1 1"� .•�9�� L / 20' BSBL 142.04' I. (.7 9 NO0'24'54'W 91.99' ENTERLINE CREDO R/W LEGEND: e FOUND CONC. MON. IN CASE W /NAIL (PER PLAT OF FOS7ERVIEW ESTATES) 0 FOUND REB4R • SET 5/8' REBAR, 1.5 # 29537 R/W RIGHT OF WAY BUILDING SETBACKS: 20' FRONT YARD SETBACK TYPICAL 1' Q SIDE YARD K TYPICAL TUSP 79 -26 —SS 8004240503 9, PAGE 95 FOUND REBAR RAF FOUND REM, 983 FOUND 3/4 " Jr . RON PIPE] � 11 1 COM OF 19 c rn / 4 ak i Ot / cj4).4 '1' t .1 4 \ N„, '‘ / # 4 4: A :... l i?..1 \ \ / (R 1. 45. /t' \ \ ta a: *. \ FOUND REBAR; 20' BS B L 7l; \ , 85BL, C3 77.01 ' y CS C4 SOT' : '091V 513.29' D 16 32 618.55' — Nss318 3 -. NO5'53'18.• 208.5. ,1 501'28'09V R-2 43RD AVENUE S. fa R266.46J R� 4 41;= . 2 48 16.5 .3 5' 4 50" LOT ADDRESSES: TRACT A' — 13441 AMCAMM maw, 7UKWILt OA 98168 LOT 1 - 13542 43RD AVE, SOUTH, TUKWItA, IIf4' 98188 LOT 2 - 13532 43RD AVE, SOWN, TUKIWLA, WA 98168 LOT 3 - 13522 43RD AVE, SOWN, TUKWILA. W4 98168 LOT 4 - 13435 MMG404M ROAD, 7UKWILA. WA 98168 LOT 5 - 13512 43RD AVE, SOUTH, TUKWLI, WA 98168 LOT 6 - 13425 MACADAM ROAD, TUKWILA, W4 98188 • LOT 7 - 13434 43RD AVE, SOUTH TUKWLLA. W4 98168 CURVE TABLE VOL 9. r?GE 95 .. TRACT .20 LINE TABLE Li N89'02 40'E 18.53' L2 1105'53'18T 14.73' • CRONES & ASSOC. LAND SURVEYORS RECORDING NO. PORTION OF Si. 1 /4 of N.B. 1/4, S. 15 T. 23N R. ' W.M. '•b. 348'09'373V 30.00' 9 5• , L 43 ry ,�k' / / GRAPHIC SCALE 0 70 10 120 ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 60 ft. COR. OF 19 VOL. /PAGE / '1;'3 34.7'' N88'20 '52V-R—'1 • 3 i 8 200.0 S9 R L- 61.53' t e / 0- 173734, ii i o. / /2.5.% 0 OSTERL I g F vo ESTA TES PG 64 REVISED 11/14/03 58 '19'56'E R 03 4 !4 4, 4v DWN. BY DATE JOB NO. MLS/KMB/GR4 AUGUST, 2000 woo-mi SHORT PUl DNG I' SHORT PLAT FOR SARA DEVELOPMENT LOT 8 - 13428 43RD AVE. soWH. 1UKWIL4 NO 98168 DET. TRACT - 13405 43RD AVE. SOUTH, mow', WA 98168 .. xrj '�•1+1iir�•cr, Sa , . .� •:i� >'_ - : P'. t i ro.. .1-' . t. A�� w,'i %= '.'�:'.i;�y i t A ., i..1» t: w •' :r 'Y• ,tA. jw w j ^A • • � fn i� ..`.?` i - LY 4: tYL ° ,i: ^ • S�. L: a {i',' A.C�: ,h .,f. .. ... .. _ _ '':'- ^3.. fit:::. ,... .. .. ... • . -. .. _i f, .. , •. .. .... . :::tf1Yi { lllli iij�iq�iT��lllltii� ',I I'Ili•'I'I'i'.i' l + � I,'li.l;l.I'i�l llll IIlillllllllllllIII AVESTCO1T : II iiiillllllllltIlllllllliIlllilllliIlllilllliIlllllillpJllllllllpIlllllIIIIIllllllllpJlllllIII1111lllillpJl llllllll1lll llllll1llllliiiiliiiillllllillil ,1�• :it ti• C • 2ty of Tukwila SHORT PLAT NO. L2000 -016 APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Examined and approved this ____ day of _ _________, 20__- Planning and Community Development Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Examined and approved this ____ day of _____ _____. 20___ Public Works Director DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Exomined and approved this __ day of ____, 20____ Assessor Depuy Assessor t Account Number RECORDING NO VOL. /PAGE DECLARATION PORTION OF S.E. _ /4 N.E. _ / 15 23N 4E _ _ 1 4 o f _ __ 1 4 , S . _ __ _ T. __ R. _ _W. M. Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owner(s) In fee simple of the land herein described do hereby make a Short subdivision thereof pursuant TO RCW 58.17.060 and acknowledge that sold subdivision shoil not be further divided in any manner within a period of five years, from date of record, without the filing of a final plot. The undersigned further declare this short plot to be the graphic representation of sold short subdivision aed the same Is mode with the free consent and in accordance in accorrdaa nce with the desi re of the owner(s). In witness whereof we set our hands and seals. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE ADDRESS: LOT 10, BLOCK 2, COLEGROV£SS ACRE TRACTS ACCORDING LOT 7 4526 SOUTH 136TH STREET TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLA PAGE 85, COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT ' OF FOSTERWEW ESTATES TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, 98168 C IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE S8832'49 E• 185,24 FEET, THENCE NO128'09 E 291.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN EXCEPT THE WEST 50 FEE •i AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 20 FEET OF S. 135TH STREET; THENCE N667424 "W ALONG SAiD SOUTHERLY MARGIN 142.12 THEREOF RESERVED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY FEET, THENCE N4542'59 "W CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 39.80 DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 2054462 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S6026'49 "W FOR 106.70 FEET THENCE N32175'09 "W FOR 65.98 FEET; THENCE N6074'19 E• FOR 90.41 FEET TO MEAN LOT WIDTHS: (Print Name) (Print Name) A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN; THENCE S45'42'59"E ALONG SAID REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: SOUTHERLY MARGIN FOR 68.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT '1 - 16a93' LOT 2 - 76,51' (Address) (Address) LOT 8 LOT 3 - 69.24' LOT 1 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERWEW ESTATES LOT 4 - 56.91' BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE S88•32'49 "E 185.24 LOT 5 - 58.89' AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE S88:3249 "E 185.24 FEET; THENCE NOl28'09'E 291.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN LOT 6 - 65.81' FEET; THENCE N8832'49 "W 185.24 FEET TO A OF S. 135TH STREET, THENCE N6674'24"W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 14Z12 LOT 7 - 66.12' HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS 552'40'42 "W, AND FEET; THENCE N4542'59 "W CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 108.77 LOT 8 - 52.90' 4 70,97 FEET, THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S6074'19 "W FOR 168.80 FEET TO A • LOT 9 - 82.82' 43RD AVE. S., THROUGH A CENTRAL POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVE. S.; THENCE N128'09 "E ALONG SAiD THENCE NN 413023 "W ALONG SAID .2 9 FEET; 37.14 FEET; F MARGIN FOR 77.01 FEET; THENCE N77 45 22 "E FOR 126,84 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID MARGIN M N FOR R F 988.2 TO THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS SOUTHERLY MARGIN; THENCE S45'42'59"E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN FOR N4.357'10 "E, AND 256.48 FEET, THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL 28.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT AREAS: ANGLE OF 3'33'47" FOR 15.95 FEET, THENCE N6845'02 E• FOR 168.61 FEET; (Phone Number) (Phone Number) (Signature) (Signature) STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me THENCE S864538'E FOR 132.99; LOT 9 LOT 1 - 39,514.61 SF.t, 0.907 AC,t THENCE S128'09 "W FOR 171.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEG INNING, COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERWEW LOT 2 - 24,457.10 SF,.t, 0.561 AC.1 ESTATES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE LOT 3 - 19,243.81 SF.,t, 0.442 AC.± LOT 2 LOT 4 - Z496.61 S.F,t, 0.172 S,F,t COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES 5883249E POINT ON THE E SOUTHERLY FEET; THENCE Y MARGIN O OF T 291,40 FEET TO A OUF S S 1 13 35TH STREET; SF. THENCE LOT 5 - 7,071.84 f, 0.162 AC.t AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE 58832'49"E 185.24 FEET, LOT 6 - 6,529.40 S.F.t, 0.150 AC.± N667424 "W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN (47,12 FEET; THENCE THENCE NO128'09 E 171.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LOT 7 - 6,514.59 S.F.f, 0.150•AC..h THENCE N86'45'38"W FOR 132.99 FEET, N4542'5 O CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 137.55 FEET TO THE POI NT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 5774522 "W FOR 126.84 FEET TO A LOT 8 - 7,080,42 SF.t, 0,163 AC.t THENCE 56645'02 "W FOR 16861 FEET; POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVE. S; THENCE N128'09'E LOT 9 - 14,969.97 S.Ff, 0.344 AC.i TO THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE, AND EASTERLY MARGIN OF 43RD AVE. S., ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN FOR 392.24 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION TOTAL LOT: 132.878,35 S.F.f, 3.050 AC.± THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N473057'£ AND 256.48 FEET, THENCE POINT OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN AND THE SOUTHERWESTERLY MARGIN OF ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 903'54" FOR 40.58 FEET; S. 135TH STREET; THENCE S2977'27 "E ALONG SAiD SOUTHWESTERLY THENCE N5578'55 "E FOR 153.47 FEET: MARGIN FOR 65.40 FEET; THENCE S553'18 "W CONTINUING ALONG SAID THENCE N7475 30 "E FOR 199.20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN FOR 208.53 FEET; THENCE S45'42'59"E S. 135TH STREET' THENCE S128'09 "W FOR 119.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN FOR 144.29 FEET TO LOT 3 THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE 588'32'49"E 185.24 NOTES: FEET; THENCE N0128'09 E 291.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN to me known to be the individual who excuted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under m hand and official l this cloy of my sea Signature: Name of commissioned. Title: My appointment expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who excuted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the some os his /her voluntary OF S. 135TH STREET AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 5747530 "W FOR FIELD MEASUREMENTS FOR THIS SURVEY PERFORMED 199.20 FEET; THENCE S557855 "W FOR 153.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY WITH A 2" TOPCON CTS 38 INSTRUMENT, BY TRAVERSE MARGIN OF 43RD AVE. S. AND THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE, METHODS, AND MEET OR EXCEED ACCURACY STANDARDS THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N5634 51 "E AND 256.48 FEET, THENCE OF 1:10,000. ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 132940" FOR 60.41 FEET; BENCHMARK USED FOR VERTICAL DATUM IS THE WEST RIM OF THE THENCE N56 40'19 E FOR 140.25 FEET; THENCE N6708'41 "E FOR 139.47 FEET SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ON SOUTH 134TH STREET NEAR THE TO A POINT ON SAiD SOUTHERLY MARGIN; THENCE S667424E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY CORNER OF TRACT 6, IN FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS SOUTHERLY MARGIN FOR 108.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. VOL. 9/95; SAID MANHOLE BEING TIED TO ARMY CORPS BENCH PPGD 6.83A IN 1985 BY DAVID EVANS & ASSOC. LOT 4 ELEVATION = 15.09 FEET MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL) COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ON SITE ARE TO BE REMOVED BEFORE • AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE S8832'49E 185.24 BEFORE RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION. FEET; THENCE NO128'O9 E 291.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF S. 135TH STREET; THENCE N6674 24 "W ALONG SAID MARGIN 108.47 FEET; THENCE 567'08'41"W 139.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ;; BASIS OF BEARINGS: THENCE S56'40'19 "W FOR 140.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF act and deed tor the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this slay of Signature: Name of commissioned: Title My appointment expires Short Plot Number 43RD AVE. S. AND THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS THE RADIUS PO/NT OF WHICH BEARS N700432 E, AND 256.48 FEET, THENCE PER PLAT OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES, VOL 194, PG. 64, ALONG SAiD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1433'33" FOR 65.17 FEET, BETWEEN THE TWO FOUND MONS. ALONG THE CENTERLINE . THENCE N6026'49 "E FOR 118.70 FEET, OF S. 137TH STREET AS SHOWN. • THENCE S32735'09 "E FOR 53.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LOT 5 CROSS REFERENCE: CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE There are no delinquent special assessments, and all special assessments on any of the property that is dedicated as streets, alleys or for other public use are paid in full. Examined and approved b the Cit of tukwilo Finance Deportment by City p this day of COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE FOLLOWING SURVEYS FOR AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64: THENCE S8832'49 E 185.24 SECTION SUBDIVISION AND TIE INFORMATION: FEET THENCE NO128'09 E 291.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN THE PLAT OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES, VOL. 194, PG. 64. OF S. 135TH STREET; THENCE N667424 "W ALONG SAiD SOUTHERLY MARGIN 10847 THE PLAT OF FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS. VOL. 9, PG. 95. FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 567'08'41"W FOR 139.47 FEET; RECORD OF SURVEY BOOK 73, PAGE 14. THENCE 1412775'09"W 53.01 49 E RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FOR FEET; THENCE N6026 FOR 106.70 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN; THENCE S45'42'59"E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN FOR,39.80 FEET, THENCE S667424E CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY • MARGIN FOR 38.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT 6 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF FOSTERVIEW ESTATES AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS, PAGE 64. THENCE S88 °' 1 S88 - 32 . 49"E 185.24 "nr� ., v " : ,. • -9 ,, !"h i� FEET; S. . 1335TH THENCE 09 E , THENCE N6 6742 CE1 , '14 ' 2 TO A PO /NS 4 "W ALONG SA ID ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN S SOUTHERLY MARGIN 14Z12 FEET; THENCE N4542'59 "W CONTNU/NG ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN l ,< ^ , :. , I 39.80 FEET; THENCE S6026'49 "W 106.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; Cf f, ,: THENCE 5602649 "W FOR 118.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 'p 43RD AVE. S AND THE BEGINNING OF A HORIZONTAL CURVE THE RADIUS POINT OF OL�L lop, WENT WHICH BEARS N84:38'057', AND 256.48 FEET, THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 733'56" FOR 35.36 FEET; THENCE N60'14'19'E FOR 78.39 FEET; THENCE S32'05'09 "E FOR 65.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. VOL. /PAGE Finance Director • COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE I certify that all property taxes ore paid and that a deposit has been mode In sufficient amount to pay the taxes for the following year; that there are no delinquent special assessments certified to this office for collection; and that all special assessments on any property herein dedicated os streets, alleys, of for other public use are paid in full. Examined and approved by the City of tukwila Finance Department this day of Deputy King County Treasurer King County Treasurer RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of ,20 at M in book of at page at the request of James D. Crones Mgr. Supt. of Records LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This Short Plat correctly represents a survey made by d ditf me or under my direction in conformance with the re uirements of the a ro riate State and County q Statute and Ordinance in January, 2000, y f �� o7 Certificate No. .29.,u7 ,��r�. °��� °- ` 4 I CRON & ASSOC. C N F \ ' ''������������������� � S' D "'� � `r °; 4 • ' , • „ ' o o °lrsF` 0 14 z, LAS N. WM ' r t '• .-7/777777777777777,/, 4 -13 -2001 ' SHORT PLAT FOR SARA DEVELOPMENT • 5 �' l A LA SURVEYORS ` �' I' 23806 190TH AVE. SE. KENT, WA 98042 (425) 432 - 5930 DWN. BY MLSAMB DATE AUGUST, 2000 JOB NO. SARAD -1B SHORT PLAT FLX CHKD. BY EMW SHEET 1 OF 2 • I lllll'lI1Ii :1IlI 111JIillll.If ,I, IIIIIII Ii. II IlI L � Il ' 4 I IIIl i� iIIIII l li ll lil l ' Il l IIl l il il Inch bit; 7 :. 't 5 6 e I WESTCOTT . 56¢r rep• City of Tukwila SHORT PLAT NO. XXXXX -XXX #4 LOT 7 �\ GUYsANCHOR BUS STOP SIGN YIELD SIGN GUY POLE R/W STOP SIGN UTILITY INFORMATION: #1. - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION: 84.31 FEET I.E. NORTH: 74.31 FEET (10" PVC) I.E. SOUTH: 68.91 FEET (10" PVC) #2. - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION: 90.43 FEET I.E. NORTH: 82.63 FEET (10" PVC) LE. SOUTH: 82.68 FEET (10" PVC) #3. - STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN RIM ELEVATION: 86.37 FEET I.E. NORTH: 79.70 FEET 24" STEEL) I.E. SOUTH: 79.74 FEET (24" STEEL) I.E. WEST: 84.97 FEET (6" ABS) #4. - STORM ORAIN CATCH BASIN RIM NORTH -EAST 8 64 84 EET (24" STEEL) I.E. SOUTH: 64.86 FEET (24" STEEL) LE. NORTH -WEST 65.46 FEET (4" STEEL) #5. - STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (ROUND) RIM ELEVATION: 68.40 FEET I.E. NORTH: 63.95 FEET (24" STEEL) I.E. SOUTH -WEST 64.10 FEET (24" STEEL) I.E. SOUTH- EAST. 65.00 FEET (12" CONC.) #6. - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM NORTH:n 4.00 EET (10" PVC) 1.E. SOUTH: 74.00 FEET (10" PVC) TUSP 79 -26 -SS 8004240503 FOUND REBAR; LS# 16650 $ _ R /W x E/P 3 43RD AVE S # FOUND REBAR; NO CAP . ..... . .e., (3:: .. .. #7. - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION: 85.15 FEET I.E. NORTH-WEST: 78.87 FEET (10" PVC) I.E. SOUTH- EAST: 78.90 FEET (10" PVC) #8. - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION: 74.22 FEET I.E. NORTH: 64.27 FEET (10 "PVC) I.E. SOUTH: 64.32 FEET (10" PVC) #9. - STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN RIM ELEVATION: : .40 FEET (24" STEEL) I.E. SOUTH: 74.37 FEET (24" STEEL) #10. - STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN RIM ELEVATION: 106.54 FEET I.E. NORTH: 103.19 FEET (15" ABS) I.E. SOUTH: 103.14 FEET (15" ABS) I.E. SOUTHWEST: 103.34 FEET (15' ABS) #11. - STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN RIM ELEVATION: 5Z57 FEET I.E. NORTHWEST 54.84 (12" CONC.) I.E. SOUTHEAST 54.62 FEET (12" CONC.) I.E. SOUTHWEST: 54.77 FEET (6" PIPE) DRAIN CULVERT 24" CONCRETE \ \ FOUND REBAR LS# 19583 FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE CULVERT IN; 4' X 4' CONCRETE / \ N WATER PAINT MARKS -70 BUILDING ETBACKS: 20' FRONT YARD SETBACK TYPICAL 10' REAR YARD SETBACK TYPICAL 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK TYPICAL R/W CULVERT OUT; 2" CO CRETE LOT 20 R= 286.48' L= 242.90' 4= 48'34'50" PA0E 05 CULVERT IN; 15" ABS CRONES & ASSOC. LAND SURVEYORS 23806 190TH : S.E. KENT, WA 98042 (425) 432 -5930 I NW CORNER OF TRACT C ROAD ' CENTERLINE BARRIER OF DITCH RECORDING NO. PORTION OF S•E__1 /4 of N.E. _1 /4, S. _15 _ T. _23N_ R. _4E _W. M. 1 , 1,F,d l,J _,_JJl1!l,J,'r I .S. D. b t4 r it! 4 ".• l F F F F F F F F F F F F F F M: 4 -13 -2001 126-- CULVERT OUT; 15" ABS GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. CONTOUR NTERVAL = 2 FEET C' tn�s> CT NEW ES (P �1 0f� °SCR R - / . 33a. 73 g9 Ro 118 X30 120 A 122 ---' - D' n DWN. BY MLS /KMB VOL. /PAGE LEGEND: ▪ FOUND CONC. MON. IN CASE W/NAIL ® MANHOLE (STORM DRAIN) Ox TRAVERSE FOUND REBAR POINT ❑ DRAIN CATCH BASIN S WATER VALVE a FIRE HYDRANT -0- UTILITY POLE - - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CHKD. BY EMW ESTAT S EW 6 a OSTE pL I I9 � F SHORT PLAT FOR SARA DEVELOPMENT DATE AUGUST, 2000 SCALE 1"=60' N8820'52'W - -R R =205 - ' 1= 61.53' 4= 1737 34" , 14 000 - r t r N v 0 0 F OP �� s ai9'56•E'R W 0 J 0 JOB NO. SARAD - 18 SHORT PLAT.FLX SHEET 2 OF 2 I I IIII1IIIII I IIIIIIIII1IIIIII a.l Inch 1.in 11 • 2 AVESTCOTT" sw.,8 III III, III 1 I I I Ijl l I jl I Iji I I I I • .I ,I.. ' ..�I 1 6I III 1I •I I I I I I I6 20 10 0 20 40 60 CALL 2 DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 C(/ GA/ STOP o� F S /GN SCALE IN FEET GUY POLE CHOR E /P #7 R/4, _. STOP S /GN TREF LEGEND 1. 24" ALDER 2. 24" ALDER 3. 23" MAPLE (DEAD) 4. 30" MAPLE 5. 40" MAPLE (2 6. 10" MAPLE 7. 10" MAPLE 8. 22" MAPLE (2 9. 10" MAPLE 10. 18" MAPLE 11. 28" MAPLE (2 7 12. 10" MAPLE 13. 16" MAPLE 14. 12" MAPLE 21. 28 15. 12" MAPLE 16. 30" MAPLE 17. 36" MAPLE 24.7" 7" ALDER 19. 16" ALDER 25. 20. 20" ALDER " ALDER (3 TRKS) 23. 22. 6 ALDER 12'� ALDER 6" ALDER 27" ALDER TRKS) TRKS) 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 7" ALDER 12" ALDER 36" MAPLE 7" ALDER 8" MAPLE 20" MAPLE 8' MAPLE (7 TRKS) 30" MAPLE (3 TRKS) 40" MAPLE (4 TRKS) 20" MAPLE ?f 1 5 rA�.D R (D 8 3 . 2 8 M, LE P Af�L -i 41, 11 MAPL 0 42. 6" MAPLE 43. 12" MAPLE 17" MAPLE 44 . 45 48" MAPLE 46 9" MAP 47. 11 " ALDER 48. 36" MAPLE 49. 16" MAPLE Si 76 50. 26" MAPLE _ FOUND L O 84/�?. 51, 20" MAPLE 52. 20" MAPLE 53. 11" MAPLE 54. 36" ALDER (2 55. 15" ALDER 56, 15" ALDER 57, " DER 58. 15" ALDER 59. 15" ALDER 60. 15" ALDER 61. 7" ALDER ,,,z. 18" ALDER (3 E 6" ALDC� 10 � 66. 12" ALDER 67. 18" ALDER 68. 18" ALDER 69. , " 71. 8" ALDER 72, 10" ALDER 73. 15" ALDER 74. 12" CHERRY (2 75, 15" ALDER TRKS) TRKS) TRKS) 76. 78. 79. $0. 81. 82. 84. 85, 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92, 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 13" CHERRY 16'ER[2 Y 12` CHERRY 15" CHERRY ALDER 22" CHERRY 30" APPLE (2 1.5" CHERR 36" CHERRY 13" CHERRY 8" ALDER 13" CHERRY 4' CHERRY 12" CHERRY 12" ALDER 20" MAPLE 13" MAPLE 12" LDER 18" ALDER 42" MAPLE 17" MAPLE 12" 400 10" CHERRY 30" APPLE (2 TRKS) 24 CONCRETE FOU NO APREB,gR •• 3 +p 9 P _ _ USED DR /VE� Y � ...................:....._. DEC /DUQ TREE TRAVERSE PO//VT TRKS) R 4 o Tvees WA 7-4- _ v p /PE CU f/E 'CO NCRETE '' '' 0 S - C OQ N I RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 5 Hill PFRA,ItTP NTFP dr... by MS .col. 1 " =20' dot job no, .Anl 08 of 00 S N.e4W by JM 04/01 * �tll�lii�ilt�ti 1 }1)111 1:ir 1 1�j1� 111101 1�11i�111 1114 11 11111111111 8 111 1 111 1 111 i111I 1 � • 'WESTCor1 - • IIIIIIIhIIII IIIIhlillI111111111IIIIIlIIII IIII0IIIIIII11IIIIIIIIIlii:„11lIIIII1111liiiiI11IIh111IliIItiill111111111111IIIiIIIIIIIIIhII IIIIIo TREE LEGEND 1. 24" ALDER 2. 24" ALDER 3, 23" MAPLE (DEAD) 4. 30" MAPLE 5, 40" MAPLE (2 TRKS) 6. 10" MAPLE 7. 10" MAPLE 8. 22" MAPLE (2 TRKS) 9. 10" MAPLE 10. 18" MAPLE 11. 28" MAPLE (2 TRKS) 12. 10" MAPLE 13. 16" MAPLE 14. 12" MAPLE 15. 12" MAPLE 16. 30" MAPLE 17. 36" MAPLE 18. 7" ALDER 19. 16" ALDER 20. 20" ALDER 21. 28" ALDER (3 TRKS) 22. 6" ALDER 23. 12" ALDER 24. 6" ALDER 25, 27" ALDER 51. 20" MAPLE 52. 20" MAPLE 53. 11" MAPLE 54. 36" ALDER (2 TRKS) 55. 15" ALDER 56. 15" ALDER 57. 16" ALDER 58. 15" ALDER 59. 15" ALDER 60. 15" ALDER 61. 7" ALDER 62. 18" ALDER 63. 12" MAPLE 64. 36" ALDER (3 TRKS) 65. 10" ALDER 66. 12" ALDER 67. 18" ALDER 68. 18" ALDER 69. 22" ALDER 70. 12" ALDER 71. 8" ALDER 72. 10" ALDER 73. 15" ALDER 74. 12" CHERRY (2 TRKS) 75. 15" ALDER 76. 13" CHERRY 77. 16" CHERRY 78. 12" CHERRY 79. 15" CHERRY 80. 18" ALDER 81. 22" CHERRY 82. 30" APPLE (2 TRKS) 83. 15" CHERRY 84. 36" CHERRY 85. 13" CHERRY 86. 8" ALDER 87. 13" CHERRY 88. 4' CHERRY 89. 12" CHERRY 90. 12" ALDER 91. 20" MAPLE 92. 13" MAPLE 93. 12" LDER 94. 18" ALDER 95. 42" MAPLE 96. 17" MAPLE 97. 12" ALDER 98. 10" CHERRY 99. 30" APPLE (2 TRKS) 26. 7" ALDER 27. 12" ALDER 28. 36" MAPLE 29. 7" ALDER 30. 8" MAPLE 31. 20" MAPLE 32. 8' MAPLE (7 TRKS) 33. 30" MAPLE (3 TRKS) 34. 40" MAPLE (4 TRKS) 35. 20" MAPLE 36. 15" ALDER (DEAD) 37. 20" MAPLE 38. 28" MAPLE 39. 20" MAPLE 40. 11" MAPLE 41. 11" MAPLE 42. 6" MAPLE 43. 12" MAPLE 44. 17" MAPLE 45. 48" MAPLE 46. 9f-MAP-LE �. 11 ': ALDER 48. 36 AMPLE 49. 16" MAP/ F 50. 26" MAPLE Replace s 6 ''So �--. Q Fi c / � `<%Q i- <<T 9 E /P R/W 95- /'? CALL 2 DAYS BEFORE YOU DIf 1- 800 - 424 -5555 SCALE IN FEET X 2 6 \ brown by MS scale 1"=20' 1 mrx.a by JM dare 04/01 pb na. * * * * * ** m..r 09 .1100 ifllllil li�rlr rll�Ililrli� i rlr ir illli I 1 N1111 ryilril ryi r l l r l l l l l l l l l l I o�•e � it �2I � . 9 � • W£srCOu .� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I( I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I �I I I I