The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L01-076 - CITY OF TUKWILA - 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTLO1-076 2002 COMPRENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2002 COMPREHENISVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT Change has been made. Thanks, B Rebecca Fox - Re: Request revision to zoning in Permits Plus Page 1 From: Brenda Holt To: Rebecca Fox Date: 12/2/02 8:36AM Subject: Re: Request revision to zoning in Permits Plus »> Rebecca Fox 11/27/02 01:27PM »> Brenda- - Here's another change. The zoning should be LDR (not LDR -SE) at parcel # 0733000030, 11640 E. Marginal Way S. Thanks. Rebecca. (Happy Thanksgiving!) ...........�..�.,.... .. .. - .x.4 .._ •t' .t a ;,':.%.rs.w:«�.b+in�:v.A:r'..ee '.�K'P,ti +: ... �` .... M :.. .yws..iiee;c. Xs.d.r'ai ; -tcuur rapae - #4.'" Rebecca Fox - Fwd: Proposed Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code amendment From: Rebecca Fox To: Bob Baker; Jane Cantu Date: 8/5/02 1:10PM Subject: Fwd: Proposed Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code amendment Jane and Bob- - We received this comment for tonight's City Council hearing on the Comp Plan amendments. Do you want to distribute it to the members and enter it into the record? Or shall I make copies and distribute? As you wish... Thanks. Rebecca Page 1 ;I Rebecca Fox - Re: Proposed Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code amendment , —, Page 1 From: Rebecca Fox To: Invisiondesign @aol.com Date: 8/5/02 1:06PM Subject: Re: Proposed Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code amendment Ms. Malcolm: Thank you for your comment regarding the proposed change in zoning of City property located at Interurban Avenue and S 139th. I will pass your e-mail out to the City Council members at tonight's hearing. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> <Invisiondesign @aol.com> 08/05/02 12:47PM »> Rebecca: I am writing you on behalf of the Silver Dollar Casino. The Silver Dollar Casino is concerned that this change would allow the city of Tukwila to allow others to use this land as parking space. Please note that it is our wish that this land is not used for parking for any one other than the city alone. I may be reached at my office at (425) 226 -6784 x19. Thank you for your time. Sincerely yours, Susan Malcolm Steven M. Mullet, Mayor John McFarland, City Administrator Richard Simpson, Council President z 1 �z � w QQ J U O 0 CO CI co w Ord #1991 Res #1496 - F_ • w w 2 u_? CD ci =w F- z�. � 3. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes: 7/15/02 Regular & 7/22/02 Special. w w b. Approval of Vouchers. c. Accept as complete the S. 150th St. Improvements (42nd Av. S. Pg. 3 0 ED- to 46th Av. S.) with Laser Underground and Earthworks, Inc.; = w authorize release of retainage. (Final project cost $753,044.27.) F 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Code Amendments pertaining to secure community transition Pg. 9 LL z facilities: �_ b. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Pg. 25 ~ 0 >Please bring your 7/22/02 agenda packet for reference.< z August 5, 2002; 7 :00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ROLL CALL 2. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items that are not COMMENTS included on this agenda. If you wish to comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. 5. REPORTS. 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT a Agenda REGULAR MEETING a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff d. City Attorney e. Intergovernmental Councilmennbers: Pam Carter • Joe Duffle Dave Fenton • Jim Haggerton Joan Hernandez • Pamela Linder This notice is available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities upon advance request. Reasonable accommodations at public hearings are available with advance notice. Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Please call the City Clerk's office 433- 1800/TDD 248 -2933 if you require assistance. Agenda is also available at City of Tukwila's website: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Please be.advised that all Tukwila Council Meetings are audio taped. ....,. ' - : RECORD OF COUNCIL- ACTION . . Meeting Date Action Council review Agenda Item Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendments- -2002 * *8/5/02 - -- Public Hearing 3/18/02 Forward to Planning Commission 7 / • . ' • - •• - MI, rf This briefing begins the Comprehensive Plan amendment process for 2002, followed by a public meeting on 3/18/02. The briefing will include information about Tukwila's demographics, progress made toward attaining current Comp Plan objectives and proposed Comp Plan amendments. Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: 7/22/02 rf tvvvti ^- s7S Meeting Date ' Pregyred by Mayor's review Council review Agenda Item Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendments- -2002 * *8/5/02 - -- Public Hearing Original Sponsor: Council Admin. XX Timeline: 3/18/02 rf This briefing begins the Comprehensive Plan amendment process for 2002, followed by a public meeting on 3/18/02. The briefing will include information about Tukwila's demographics, progress made toward attaining current Comp Plan objectives and proposed Comp Plan amendments. Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: 7/22/02 rf tvvvti ^- s7S f},/ /o2 44 R v JH COUNCIL A GENDA S v flPSIS Initials ITEM NO. ITEM INFORMATION CAS Number: .3 d — Q ?-� 0 Original Agenda Date 3/18/02 Agenda Item Title: Comprehensive Plan Amendments- -2002 * *8/5/02 - -- Public Hearing Original Sponsor: Council Admin. XX Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: This briefing begins the Comprehensive Plan amendment process for 2002, followed by a public meeting on 3/18/02. The briefing will include information about Tukwila's demographics, progress made toward attaining current Comp Plan objectives and proposed Comp Plan amendments. Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: , 8 5 02 Cost Impact (if known): )Fund Source (if known): COUNCIL A GENDA S v flPSIS Initials ITEM NO. APPENDICES Meeting Date Attachments 3/18/02 •• Briefirig memo and notebook 7/22/02 Briefing memo with Exhibits 1 -4 and Attachments A — 8 5 02 -.. U _ . _ o . s • • ' • Please bring your 7/22 C.O.W. packet for reference '2 \ G' ffiE SAtI.'AYCJd Mt fYxl 7„Yf4. r• COUNCIL A GENDA S v flPSIS Initials ITEM NO. City of Tukwila Department of Com727721r72i y Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM July 31, 2002 TO: FROM: Steve Lancaster Tukwila City Council SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR 2001/2002 The City Council received the proposed annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2001/2002 for its briefing on July 22, 2002. A public hearing is scheduled for August 5, 2002 to receive input. Following the public hearing, the City Council will decide whether or not to adopt individual proposed amendments. This decision may be made either on August 5 or at a later date. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Process to date: Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code were submitted by December 31, 2001. The City Council held a public meeting on the proposed amendments in March, 2002. At that time, an additional proposed amendment was added for consideration, and two amendments were dropped from further consideration. (For complete background, refer to loose leaf notebooks, distributed March, 2002) A total of four potential amendments were forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration in 2002. The Planning Commission was briefed on proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments on April 4, 2002, and held a public hearing on May 23, 2002. After its public hearing, the Planning Commission made recommendations regarding the proposed amendments. On July 22, 2002, the City Council was briefed on the Planning Commission's recommendations. At each stage in the process, staff has tried to encourage public involvement. All public meetings and hearings were advertised in the paper. Staff exceeded statutory notification requirements in providing mailings to owners and occupants within 500 feet of the proposed map changes. In addition, sites with potential changes which would impact adjacent properties were posted. a7 ' ��SY" r✓` J1�Y. Y. yS�ati^ S' KLi^ tVii� l.::iv'N'�"?t Y.:.'tT,?;cvr"f"J ^! .' ril'31cH:ik.J41st.�Vd1CY'1• t• • fS+ 1 'xPR!P!/tY4Rt�'.'R�C!^' i t • 4`a Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , 6 4,e_-- HEREBY DECLARE THAT: 2 ( Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: Ca/ii /Ve, I8" /G/e 6a/MI /ZeV6 . /9701 //) , Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's Signature: Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Person requesting mailing: ,4/1 Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this; day of year 2002_ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM in the Project Name: Ca/ii /Ve, I8" /G/e 6a/MI /ZeV6 . /9701 //) , Project Number: t i)/ -- () 7/P Mailer's Signature: { Person requesting mailing: ,4/1 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this; day of year 2002_ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM in the July 24, 2002 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment Comprehensive Plan / Zoning Code amendment to: 1) change the designation of City-owned property located along Interurban Avenue between South 139` St. and S. 140 St. from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI); and, 2) remove the Public Recreation Overlay from the property. (File #L01 -076) The Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing to consider a proposal changing the boundary between Low Density Residential (LDR) adjacent to Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) in the vicinity of Interurban Avenue South between S. 139` St. and S. 140 St. This is will include consideration of a change in designation of a parcel owned by the City of Tukwila, and removing the Public Recreation Overlay on the parcel.(See map on reverse) The public hearing will give residents and businesses an opportunity to comment on the proposal. After the hearing, the City Council will make its decision. The City of Tukwila welcomes both in- person and written comments from Tukwila's residential and business community about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment. Written comments may be submitted prior to August 5, 2002 via e-mail or addressed to the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Tukwila Department of Community Development at (206)431 -3683 or rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions or would like additional information about this proposal. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Public Hearing Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Monday, August 5 15, 2002 7:00 p.m. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Steven M. Mullet, Mayor i20.t ux pq kigA7Z3 . SWAi.4w•: AIHar.........o..rw ..++....... r.A:.. ...s.+ ' t Y•Y.:_Ff_ !`?Y ? L01 -076 (a) LDR TO C /LI on Interurban Avenue between S. 139th St. & S. 140th St. n' tul.»' ifit' ka +s"7laS?`.::b' -4M 'Fir4- A Z W Ce J U coo W I U) LL WO g I— U- Z � I— O Z I- w w : Ca O UJ P. .. Z W = O Z City of Tukwila NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, August 5, 2002 at 7 p.m. in the council chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington, to consider the following: An ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan map and policies; and zoning map. The proposed amendnzents are as follows: 1. Change map designation from Low Density Residential to Commercial /Light Industrial on City -owned parcel on Interurban Avenue South between S. 139 Street and S. 140 Street; 2. Add policy /3.4.15 Encourage transit- oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations. 3. Add policy 13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking into residential neighborhoods or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on this issue. For those unable to attend the meeting in person, you may submit written testimony to the City Clerk's office until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 5, 2002. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's office by noon on August 1, 2002 if we can be of assistance (206- 433 -1800 or TDD 206 -248- 2933). Published: Seattle Times, July 19, 2002 • g CSC r e E. Cantu,CMC, City Clerk �ryi y:tvs •�i +it <.Y.'YF'fil w Ww.,�l!iky I 3. SPECIAL ISSUES 4. REPORTS 5. MISCELLANEOUS Steven M. Mullet, Mayor John ivlcFarland, City Administrator Richard Simpson, Council President COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE PLEASE NOTE: Budget Retreat — 5:30 PM July 22, 2002; 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION 7. ADJOURNMENT 4. ADJOURNMENT Tuki1a City Couci1 Agenda Councilmembers: Pam Carter • Joe Duffle Dave Fenton • Jim Haggerton Joan Hernandez • Pamela Linder Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers 2. CITIZEN COMMENTS/ At this time, you are invited to comment on items that are not included on this "s agenda. If you wish to comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. a. Update on Code Amendments pertaining to secure community transition facilities. b. Briefing on Comprehensive Plan amendments. a. Mayor d. City Attorney b. City Council e. Intergovernmental c. Staff SPECIAL MEETING This notice is available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities upon advance request. Reasonable accommodations at public hearings are available with advance notice. Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Please call the City Clerk's office 433- 1800/TDD 248 -2933 if you require assistance. Agenda is also available at City of Tukwila's website: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Please be advised that all Tukwila Council Meetings are audio taped. Pg. 3 Pg. 51 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 2. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of vouchers. 3. OLD BUSINESS Authorize Mayor to sign an agreement with Berger Partnerships in Pg. 89 the amount of $41,235 for the Foster Golf Links course renovation work. C /.7? :'AaW.S��if�.`i»_...- .....n Meeting Date ITEM INFORMATION CAS Number: Council review Original Agenda Date 3/11/02 Agenda Item Title: Co Comprehensive Plan Amendments - -2002 Original Sponsor: Council Admin. XX Timeline: rf Sponsor's Summary: This briefing begins the Comprehensive Plan amendment process for 2002, followed by a public meeting on 3/18/02. The briefing will include information about Tukwila's demographics, progress made toward attaining current Comp Plan objectives and proposed Comp Plan amendments. Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: 7/22/02 rf Cost Impact (if known): Fund Source (if known): Meeting Date Pre red by Mayor's review Council review 3/11/02 rf 3/18/02 rf 7/22/02 rf COLT JCIL AGENDA Si'1 - OPSIS Initials ITEM NO. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date 3/11/02 3/18/02 Action Forward to Public Meeting Forward to Planning Commission APPENDICES Meeting Date 3/11/02 7/22/02 Attachments Briefing memo and notebook Briefing memo ♦,✓rcfV. City of Tukwila MEMORANDUM July 17, 2002 TO: Tukwila City Council FROM: Steve Lancaster SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR 2001/2002 Enclosed with this memo are the proposed annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2001 /2002. There will be a briefing on July 22, 2002 to review the proposals and the Planning Commission's recommendations. A public hearing is scheduled for August 5, 2002 to receive input. After the public hearing, the City Council will make its final decision about whether or not to adopt individual proposed amendments. Process to date: Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code were submitted by December 31, 2001. The City Council held a public meeting on the proposed amendments in March, 2002. At that time, an additional proposed amendment was added for consideration, and two amendments were dropped from further consideration. (For complete background, refer to loose leaf notebooks, distributed March, 2002) A total of four potential amendments were forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration in 2002. The Planning Commission was briefed on proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments on April 4, 2002, and held a public hearing on May 23, 2002. After its public hearing, the Planning Commission made recommendations regarding the proposed amendments which are included in this packet. At each stage in the process, staff has tried to encourage public involvement. All public meetings and hearings were advertised in the paper. Staff exceeded statutory notification requirements in providing mailings to owners and occupants within 500 feet of the proposed map changes. In addition, sites with potential changes which would impact adjacent properties were posted. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 71e4A iv:eKy cp Council Consideration After its public hearing, the City Council will make a final decision on each of the proposed amendments. The City Council may: z • Adopt a proposed amendment; i • Adopt a modified version of a proposed amendment; or w cc 2 • Reject the proposed amendment. 6 J 0 00 Consideration of these proposed amendments is a legislative action. Contested decisions u) W are appealed to Superior Court. - i U) u_ Summary of proposed amendments and Planning Commission recommendations: w o The following are the Planning Commission's recommendations on the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. Refer to Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4 for complete Planning Commission Staff Reports. = a I- I LL' Z • LO1 - 076 (a) The Planning Commission recommended approval of a request by 0 Tukwila Public Works for a Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map change from LDR to w E- w C/LI on City -owned property adjacent to the maintenance shops along Interurban j o Avenue S. between S 139 St. and S. 140 St. (See attached map). o o1— • L01 076(b) The Planning Commission recommended delaying consideration until z 0 staff prepares potential policy changes that may be needed as a result of revising the Transportation Element and Concurrency Ordinance. Specific items will be w z forwarded to the City Council and Planning Commission for consideration and o adoption prior to December 31, 2002. p I • LO1 - 076 (c) The Planning Commission recommended adding a new amendment as follows "13.4.15 Encourage transit - oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations." • LO1 - 076 (d) The Planning Commission recommended adding a new amendment as follows "13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking into residential neighborhoods or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property." Cumulative Effects of Recommended Amendments The likely impacts of recommended amendments are varied. Changing LDR to C /LI will allow the possibility of increased development at the City Shops (L01- 076(a). The potential impacts of L01- 076(b) will be limited, and will depend on specific changes to be considered later in 2002 when the City Council reviews updates to the Concurrency Ordinance. Two amendments will address the likely impacts of potential development associated with high capacity transit. L01- 076(c) will encourage transit - oriented land uses near high capacity transit, while L01 -076 (d) will limit spillover parking adjacent to park -n' -ride lots by requiring adequate parking facilities. z Exhibits: 1. Summary Table of Recommended Amendments 2. Planning Commission Public Hearing Minutes (5/23/02) 3. Draft Ordinance with Planning Commission Recommendations 4. CAP minutes ( 6/18/02) Future Steps: There will be a public hearing on the recommended amendments on August 5, 2002. In addition to the proposed amendments currently under consideration, staff will return to the Council at a later time with review of the appropriate uses for the MIC/H zone, including whether or not offices should be allowed, and State - mandated revisions to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance including consideration of "best available science." Exhibit 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION (Per City Council, 3/18/02) Z W l 2 J U 00 to 0 W H � LL W U_ ¢ to o I W Z Z 0 W W 0 O co 0 I-- WW I I— H LL- .. Z W 0 0 Z Proposal (as submitted) Submitted by Background Recommendation ' Update Sensitive Areas Ordinance to include "Best Available Science" per GMA requirements City of Tukwila Community Development Review of the Growth Management Act's latest requirements has shown that "Best Available Science" must be incorporated into sensitive /critical areas review process. Prepare in 2002, 2003. Return to Planning Commission for recommendation L01 -076 (a ) LDR to C /LI for future City Shops expansion City of Tukwila Public Works Tukwila Public Works rezoning City-owned property for LDR to C /CI at 139`" and Interuban to provide potential expansion for City maintenance shops Approve amendment. L01 -076 (b) Revise Transportation Background Report, Concurrency Ordinance and associated Comprehensive Plan policies as appropriate. City of Tukwila Public Works The City of Tukwila requests a Comprehensive Plan amendment to accommodate potential changes which may be needed as the Transportation Element and Concurrency ordinance are updated No action requested. Specific policies will follow in 2002 L01 -076 (c )Encourage transit - related uses near high capacity transit stations City of Tukwila Community Development This proposed amendment gives guidance in development near transit stations Approve amendment . L01 -076 (d) Require adequately -sized parking facilities near transit to prevent spillover onto private property City of Tukwila Community Development This proposed amendment gives guidance for parking structures near transit stations Approve amendment Exhibit 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION (Per City Council, 3/18/02) Z W l 2 J U 00 to 0 W H � LL W U_ ¢ to o I W Z Z 0 W W 0 O co 0 I-- WW I I— H LL- .. Z W 0 0 Z PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES MAY 23, 2002 The Public Hearing was called to order by Chair Livermore at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chair David Livermore, Vice Chair Kirstine Whisler, Commissioners: Vern Meryhew, Bill Arthur, Henry Marvin, Margaret Bratcher, and George Malina. Absent: Representing City Staff: Jack Pace, Rebecca Fox, and Wynetta Bivens. Exhibit 2 KIRSTINE WHISLER MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES WITH ONE CORRECTION FROM APRIL 25, 2002. VERN MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Chair Livermore, swore in those wishing to provide testimony. CASE NUMBER: L01 -076 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan as follows: (a) Amend Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning Designation of City of Tukwila property from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) to provide bus maintenance and parking facilities; (b) Amend Comprehensive Plan to provide for updating Transportation Element; (c) Add policy supporting transit- oriented development near high - capacity transit facilities; (d) Add policy requiring that parking facilities developed in conjunction with high - capacity transit stations be adequately sized to prevent spillover parking. LOCATION: City-wide except (a) which is located at City-owned property on Interurban Avenue between S. 139 St. and S. 140 St. Rebecca Fox presented the staff report. Staff recommended the following: a. 1. Approve the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code map change for the parcel in question from Low Density residential (LDR) to Commercial /Light Inddustrial (C/LI) 2. Remove the Public Recreation Overlay (PRO) for the parcel. b. Staff recommends no action at this time, but will return to the Planning Commission later in 2002 with specific policy direction. c. Staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to include the following policy: 13.4.15 Encourage transit - oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations. d. Staff recommending the Comprehensive Plan to include the following policy: 13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking in residential neighborhoods or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property. Jack Pace answered numerous questions for the Commission on Comp Plan amendment proposal (d). Prior to the Planning Commission meeting Leonard McGhee from Sound Transit, sent a letter of comments, which addressed Comp Plan amendment proposal (d), in which he proposed an alternative parking policy as follows: Planning Commission Page 2 "Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with high capacity transit systems be designed to provide balanced modes of access to the extent practical and economically feasible and work with local jurisdictions and the community to reduce the potential for spillover parking ". Mr. Mcghee presented testimony at the Public Hearing. He focused on various language staff used in their proposal, particularly the word "adequate ", he stated the term was too subjective. He also stated the term" prevent spillover" was not appropriate, and suggested substituting it with "work to reduce spillover ". z H W o: 00 07 0 w= J H 2 L- w 0 < = • a GEORGE MALINA MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS, FINDINGS, AND z CONCLUSIONS FOR CASE NUMBER L01- 076(a, b, c, & d). HENRY MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION z O ON PROPOSAL (a) BILL ARTHUR SECONDED (b) KIRSTINE WHISLER SECONDED (c & d) ALL w w VOTED IN FAVOR. v 0 - . 01— • Joi nt Planning Commission — Vern requested a copy of the annexation items and status = 0 Bill requested discussion on irregularities between Sea Tac and Tukwila F- • Sign Code Amortization Program — decision in July, staff will bring to the PC w z • MOA update and module presentation 0 N O H Mr. McGhee answered numerous questions from the Commission, which created much discussion on the raised issues of concern, Jack Pace addressed several of the raised issues as well. There were no further comments. Public Hearing closed by Chair Livermore. The Commission deliberated. DIRECTORS REPORT Adjourned at 8:30 Respectfully Submitted Wynetta Bivens Administrative Secretary Q: \PLANCOM \MINUTES \5- 23- 02.doc z EXHIBIT 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY'S 1995 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1757, TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE MAP FROM LDR TO C/LI AT INTERURBAN AVENUE AND SOUTH 139TH, AND TO ADOPT CERTAIN TRANSIT - RELATED POLICIES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABLITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations are to be reviewed and updated as appropriate; and z WHEREAS, City Planning Commission, g the Cit of Tukwila Plannin Commission after having w w n � received and studied staff analysis and comments from members of the public, J v has recommended the adoption of certain amendments; and 0 co 0 WHEREAS, the City Council provided notice and opportunities for -J i- public comment as noted below: w o 1. After due public notice, the City Council held a public meeting on March 18, 2002 to receive public comments, and a public hearing on July 15, 2002 = a to receive public testimony related to amendments to the Comprehensive Plan I- i zl- and Zoning Code; E- 0 zt- 2. Notice of the public meeting was published and mailed in the 2 o Hazelnut; notices of the public meeting were mailed to surrounding residents, o co businesses and owners; the site was posted; notice of the public hearing was ° i- posted at Tukwila City Hall and was published in the Seattle Times; and i 0 L I o WHEREAS, future expansion may be required at the City's maintenance i . z co facilities; and, F. 0 z WHEREAS, it is desirable to develop transit- oriented land uses in the vicinity of transit; and, WHEREAS, spillover parking has been a problem adjacent to certain transit facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration, believes that certain amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations are necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amend the Tukwila 1995 Comprehensive Plan Land Use map to designate parcel #00028000006, generally located along Interurban Avenue between South 139th Street and South 140th Street, as Commercial /Light Industrial, rather than Low - Density Residential. Amended Land Use 6/27/02.doc esuYawi.�'e. Section 2. Amend the Zoning Map to designate parcel #00028000006, generally located along Interurban Avenue between South 139th Street and South 140th Street, as Commercial /Light Industrial, rather than Low - Density Residential. Section 3. Amend the Zoning Map to remove the Public Recreation Overlay from parcel #00028000006, generally located along Interurban Avenue between South 139th Street and South 140th Street, as Commercial /Light Industrial, rather than Low - Density Residential. Section 4. Amend Goal 13.4 Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare, and Personal Rapid Transit, of the Tukwila 1995 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter, as adopted by Ordinance No 1757, to add the following policy: Policy 13.4.14: Encourage transit- oriented uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations. Section 5. Amend Goal 13.4 Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare, and Personal Rapid Transit, of the Tukwila 1995 Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter, as adopted by Ordinance No 1757, to add the following policy: Policy 13.4.15: Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking onto private property. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2002. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Office of the City Attorney FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Amended Land Use 6/27/02.doc trx Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Community and Parks June 18, 2002 Present: Joe Duffie, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Richard Simpson Steve Lancaster, Bruce Fletcher, Minnie Dhaliwal, Lucy Lauterbach Exhibit 4 1, Secure Community Transitional Facilities In the past session the Legislature moved to correct a problem they have with siting transitional facilities for sexually violent predators. These predators who have served their sentences, are often required to get additional treatment until they are deemed safe to live in a community. There is now only one treatment site for newly released sexual predators, on McNeil Island. Legislation has mandated that each county that has sent sexual predators to prison must accommodate their release to secure community transitional facilities, which DSHS will build. These facilities may be very small, with as few as three persons. Communities must have a procedure for dealing with siting of these facilities. The two ways to deal with it are to do nothing and wait for the state to pre -empt a city's siting, or to proactively designate sites. Tukwila is choosing to be proactive on this issue. Staff recommended and the committee agreed that a 3 person facility could be located in the MIC -H zone, if not within 1,000 feet of residential zones, schools or school bus stops, licensed day care and preschools, parks, trails, churches and the like. Steve said the state regulations for the new facilities look to be fairly tough, such as 1:1 supervision whenever a person leaves the facility, and close supervision at the home. The draft is based on a model ordinance drafted by the Kenyon law firm. One issue is the state needs to approve the plan; they are given 60 days notice in which they can comment on a plan before its adoption. Because the state will start these facilities by October 1, it will be best if a draft can be tentatively approved by the Council and sent to the Planning Commission in order to send it to the state by the end of July before the Council formally approves it sixty days later. Recommend briefing to June 24 COW. 2. Comp Plan Amendments The Council approved two amendments to send to the Planning Commission. The Commission approved one, recommended delaying, another, and added two new amendments. The committee agreed with the Planning Commissions' recommendations. Only one is a zoning question, with the other two being use issues rather than site - specific land issues. Recommend briefing at July 8 COW. 3. Crestview Park Complaints Bruce had talked to the citizen who spoke at last night's Council meeting, and had agreed to work with him on his list of actions he would like the city to take. However, Bruce documented how he had worked with Curt Treadwell over the past year and a half. He gave the committee members copies of complaints from Mr. Treadwell, and Parks' responses. He has built a fence that was approved by council eighteen months ago, and has gotten security to lock the park at dusk. Bruce said he would continue to work with Curt, who was somewhat chagrined to learn Bruce was in last night's audience. Information. Committee chair approval HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: STAFF: 1 LDR to C /LI @Interurban L01- 076(a) STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED May 15, 2002 May 23, 2002 Notice published in the Seattle Times on May 10, 2002. Mailing to adjacent properties on May 10, 2002. Site posted May 16, 2002 L01 -076 (a) City of Tukwila Public Works Department Revise Change Comprehensive Plan/Zoning designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial/Light Industrial (C /LI) on City -owned property Interurban Avenue between S. 139 Street and S. 140 Street COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) ZONE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance issued 5/15/02 Rebecca Fox ATTACHMENT A FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The Tukwila Department of Public Works requests a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code change for City -owned property to allow fuller future use of the maintenance facilities /George Long Shops. Surrounding Uses Adjacent uses include the City's Public Works Maintenance Facility (George Long Shop) on the east, and the Metro Pump Station, Seattle City Light and the Foster Golf Links to the north. The Silver Dollar and Golden Nugget Casinos are west across Interurban Avenue. Background The City is considering the feasibility of providing school bus - related services for the Tukwila School District on property which it owns adjacent to the George Long Shops. (Attachment B) The existing shop facility is too small to provide these services on -site. The current Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code designations allow only residential or recreational uses. The property is adjacent to the Foster Golf Links and has a Public Recreation Overlay. REVIEW CRITERIA Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear compliance with the criteria which follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? Goal 1.8 Transportation Corridors calls for "A more attractive form of commercial development along major streets in the community, in which buildings and plantings are prominent and oriented to pedestrians, transit and automobiles." Goal 8.3 Interurban Corridor Goal calls for "A high- amenity, multi -modal transportation corridor with a varied mix of office, commercial, recreational, high density residential and light industrial uses." Policy 8.3.1 further calls to "Develop the north section (of Interurban Boulevard) as an area of regional commercial or light industrial uses; the middle and south sections as a mix of residential, commercial or, in some areas, light industrial uses." The property in 2 LDR to C /LI @Interurban L01- 076(a) .e: as �:�.,� pan`.22�':drd`w`1Sai>.tir'1. 150.3 :�11»M1}ae:;li,U'i`L'SiYlri question is located in the "middle" section of the Interurban Corridor which allows "light industrial uses in some areas." In addition, the property is a Public Recreation Overlay. The "Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Legend" defines this overlay as follows: Public Recreation: Areas owned or controlled by a public or quasi - public agency which are dedicated for either passive or active public recreation use, or public educational uses. Per 18.42.010 of the Tukwila Municipal Code /Zoning Code (Public Recreation Overlay district) permits the following uses: 1. Public parks, trails, picnic areas and playgrounds, but not including amusement parks, golf courses, or commercial recreation; 2. Recreation facilities (public) including, but not limited to, sports fields, community centers, and golf courses. 3. Schools, preschools, elementary, junior and senior high schools (public). 2) Impacts This request is a map change that would extend the existing Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI) zone northward by one parcel. It would also likely require removal of the Public Recreation Overlay. Possible impacts from future commercial, office or light industrial uses permitted in the C/LI would depend on the type and scale of eventual development. Any type of more intensive development could generate additional traffic and noise impacts, as well as potential loss of recreational and residential land. Given the site's location, the fact that it is publicly -owned and the fact that a Metro lift station is already on the property, development of single - family housing is unlikely even with the current LDR designation. According to Parks Director Bruce Fletcher, the Public Recreation Overlay is not considered to be a significant factor on the site. 3) Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code map changes are the best means for meeting the general public need for expanded use adjacent to the City maintenance facility at the George Long Shops. It might be possible to carry out bus maintenance for the Tukwila School District without making Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code map changes since this very specific proposed use could be considered a combination of both the school and mass transit facilities that are allowed as conditional and unclassified uses in the LDR zone. This method would be less efficient. 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what result can be expected and why? The change would slightly expand the amount of property available for light industrial development, and straighten the boundary between light industrial and residential zones 3 LDR to C /LI @Interurban L01- 076(a) .rri^ dlnva0 'ItW^LRL'441�1.iMROS along Interurban Avenue. The Public Works Department proposes development of services which could benefit the community by consolidating bus maintenance services to be provided for the Tukwila School District. This would eventually generate income for the City of Tukwila and enable the City to use its shops facilities more fully. The proposed change would eliminate the potential for recreational use or public open space afforded by the Public Recreation Overlay, as well as the limited possibility that single family housing would be built at the site. CONCLUSIONS Redesignating the subject parcel from LDR to C /LI will extend the boundary between LDR and C /LI northward by one lot, and eliminate the Public Recreation Overlay (PRO). The resulting expansion of C /LI and the reduction of LDR would make the existing zoning boundary more uniform, while eliminating the potential for housing and/or public recreation on site. The redesignation would enable the City of Tukwila to expand the usable space at the George Long Shops if desired. Depending on how any future development was handled, parking and maintenance operations at the site could be highly visible along Interurban Avenue, as well as from the Foster Golf Links. Comprehensive Plan and zoning issues have been adequately addressed. When development occurs on the site, issues of site design, screening and the relationship of the Interurban Trail to the site will need to be resolved through environmental review and landscape requirements, and depending on the scale of improvements, through the Design Review process. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following: 1) approve the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code map change for the parcel in question from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial/Light Industrial (C /LI), and; 2) remove the Public Recreation Overlay (PRO) for the parcel. 4 LDR to C /LI @Interurban L01- 076(a) L01 -076 (a) LDR to C /LI ATTACHMENT •L A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMA 18.80.050) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a redesignation of your property or a change in existing Plan policies: 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? Transportation Corridors are discussed in Chapter 8, Interurban Avenue South Corridor Goals are discussed in Section 8.3 2. Why is the proposed changed the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The site is 08 acres and is currently zoned low density residential (LDR) with a recreational overlay. Adjacent uses are commercial /light industrial (C /LI). It is unlikely the City will use this site for residential. Commercial light industrial is the better choice for this site. 3. Why will the proposed changes result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what type of benefit can be expected and why? Zoning the site C /LI allows uses for the site, which better blend with the existing surrounding uses than LDR. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (TMC 18.80.010) 1. A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; The City proposes to rezone a piece of land it owns from LDR to C /LI. The piece of land is about 0.8 acres and is located at 14000 Interurban Avenue South, within the middle section of the Interurban Avenue South corridor. As described in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the area is in transition and is principally a corridor for through traffic. This site abuts the City's George Long shop. Zoning C /LI will allow the shop to more efficiently provide municipal services and it will allow the City to make use of this piece of land. Rezone /rezone application 1 :, <: ti� f +:�;�. u;`��.r%�,�i+,�,R�'�`ri- y+,•::•.,�;. r v,_ �••�?.��.tzx.� 2. A statement of the anticipated impacts of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change; The proponent anticipates additional parking for employees and possibly providing school bus parking to the Tukwila School District. 3. An explanation of why the current comprehensive plan or development regulations are deficient or should not continue in effect; This property is owned by the City and is zoned LDR with a recreational overlay. It is currently vacant, except for the Metro pump station and some utilities. The site is located south of the Golf Course and north of the Grand Central Casino and the Riverside Inn. The City's George Long shop is located directly west. The Silver Dollar, the Golden Nugget, and an office building are directly across Interurban Avenue South. Residential use by the City is highly unlikely for this site. A rezone from LDR to C /LI will allow the City to use the site in a manner that blends with the surrounding uses. 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific requirements of the Growth Management Act; The proposed rezone meets the broad intent of the Growth Management Act by promoting uses in areas where those uses currently exist. 5. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide Planning Policies; Countywide planning policies do not specifically apply to this rezone. 6. A statement of what changes, if any, would be required in functional plans (i.e., the City's water, sewer, storm water or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment is adopted; Only the Comprehensive Land Use plan will require a change. 7. A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be needed to support the proposed change, and how the proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of the City; and No capital improvement plans are required for this rezone. Rezone /rezone application 2 1w'iN.¢ii '144- 40,1 5 t v i.: 8. A statement of what other changes, if any, are required in other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the proposed change. The recreational overlay for this site would need modification. ZONING AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.030) 1. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest; Any zoning changes will be made as a direct result of changes to the Comprehensive Plan, and so shall be in conformance with this document. 2. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding areas as set forth in the application form. The proposed zoning change is not associated with a specific development. Rezone /rezone application 3 • r.::. d' �'::;:� � ,.c,. ;: 1K.�:.Pr $,.;�.iNj =: t.;. .� yo:.. }nx- ..:: ^,:::;..�. � .. ,•.tc44'W�A"..�:a.Y+'y.•M u4 � :[.:��t� %'.!.t1CCYbLO�aF•i:�in d:, �iLii' Vti�f4' NIKt+ti;hvAtNf <r��.'hY.}jq'IFNF WI�FaHV 1W614S5YYK OMB FM ra, ra IP& # =IMAM vt.. WIWI d IMI mmis s•_N■• urn-A IPA/ 4 , , MO' A PE CU= ME= VIM UM Ems muii. ro,, I MEV mi_ FR =mow Now &rex -- =maw ,..„ . • mom 1.1. imml ._,:,.. == a-i-a■-■.- biav • amen 1.1. Imo er =1 mi= lir-smi MN NIUE =INS MUM Ir4n 1.-- mg - 1 4 -wa". 1 3611 tr4.111 I ■ I MIMI MAN imp • INIIIII 1.111..1 UM 1111.11 II 1.1 ii. IIIIIM I .1 e IIMIP• •VA INN "int /PAM 1■ IN ini inn I 1 L IIMI % 111 -. 1 X. AVM MUM IIII MIMI i MI". vmmi rinn E. IIIII ImPa i nial __ mum ham maw illanoll. min Z am mais MEM ' ....liva.km... 4.:2 MU= rf rfa 2 : 7,0 NEM w..-22 L--.14,ammi '6.12094 V /V All a vz i- ma .... .... To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Director Date: February 25, 2002 u INFORMATION MEMO Subject: Rezone of City Property (Parcel adjacent to George Long Shops) Z Parcel No. 0002300006 = ~ `~ w tr 2 ISSUE v o Request that the City Council add the City owned property located along Interurban Avenue between . co o uo w South 139 Street and South 140 Street with Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes from LLI i Residential to Commercial to the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. u) u- w 2 BACKGROUND g 5 The City is evaluating the feasibility of providing school bus maintenance and associated parking for c w n the Tukwila School District at the George Long Shops. The existing maintenance facility site is F W inadequate in size to accommodate school bus parking, maneuvering and circulation. The School Z I- District anticipates the need for a change of maintenance provider during the latter part of 2002. Z w w The City owns a parcel of property adjacent to Interurban Avenue South from south 139 Street to CI South 140 Street. The property is bounded on the north by Seattle City Light and on the east by the v City's Public Works Maintenance Facility (George Long Shop). All of the City's fleet maintenance o F- is performed at this facility. King County Metro operates and maintains a sewage lift station in the w w northwesterly corner of the property. u'O The parcel is approximately 34,650 square feet in area and is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) Ili Z with a Public Recreation Overlay (PRO). Zoning for properties to the east and south is Commercial U Light Industrial (C/LI). Zoning for properties to the north, including Foster Golf Course, is LDR p I (PRO). Zoning for properties to the west along Interurban Avenue is Regional Commercial Mixed Z Use (RCM). The housing nearest the site is an apartment complex located to the north on the westerly side of Interurban Avenue. Single family housing is located several hundred feet westerly of the site beyond the RCM properties. RECOMMENDATION Add the evaluation of the Comp Plan and Zoning changes of Parcel 0002300006 to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment list for 2002. ;ATTACHMENT Z ANALYSIS The current zoning of Parcel 0002800006 does not allow uses that are being contemplated by the City and School District. Rezone of the property to C/LI without PRO would allow land use compatible with the City's maintenance facility operation and long term needs. on Interurban Avenue between NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. SUBJECT PROPERTY HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: City -wide Varies ZONE DESIGNATION: Varies STAFF: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED MAY 15, 2002 Rebecca Fox ATTACHMENT B May 23, 2002 Notice published in the Seattle Times on May 10, 2002 L01 -076 (b) City of Tukwila Public Works Department Revise Transportation Element to accommodate housekeeping changes per GMA and potential policy changes resulting from update to Concurrency Ordinance SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance issued 5/16/02 REVIEW CRITERIA VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The City of Tukwila requests a Comprehensive Plan amendment to accommodate potential policy changes which may result from updating the Transportation Element and Concurrency Ordinance later in 2002. Staff is requesting a general "placeholder" amendment at this time, and will come to the Planning Commission later in the year with specific policies for review and recommendation. 1) Impacts No action is requested at this time. Surrounding Uses Various uses throughout the city. FINDINGS Background Revisions to the Growth Management Act (GMA) require Tukwila to make several "housekeeping" changes to the Transportation Element in order to meet State requirements. At the same time, staff will review the Concurrency Ordinance to ensure that it is complete and up -to -date. The Concurrency Ordinance will be revised during 2002, and minor changes to the Transportation Element (i.e. revising effective dates) will be put into effect at that time. The specific changes are not known at this time. Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear compliance with the criteria which follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 2) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? Transportation issues, including LOS and concurrency are covered primarily in Chapter 13 of the Comprehensive Plan. Chapters 8,9,10 and 11 deal respectively with Transportation Corridors, Tukwila South, Tukwila Urban Center, and the Manufacturing/Industrial Center. Each includes policies affecting transportation in Tukwila. While Tukwila's Concurrency Ordinance meets State requirements, potential policy changes would reflect updated LOS standards and methodology, transportation needs and project lists. In addition, Tukwila is required to make specific "housekeeping" revisions to incorporate specific changes in the Growth Management Act, for example to stipulate the appropriate time period for carrying out review. z The impacts of the GMA- required "housekeeping" changes will be minimal. Potential impacts from concurrency review are unknown at this time, but their extent will depend w ce on the results of the review. Potential impacts could include reduced traffic and congestion, enhanced environment and a better match between growth and public v p facilities. cn ° w= 3) Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? N u.. What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? w g Q Proposed changes will enable Tukwila to comply with GMA requirements and to enhance the functioning of the Concurrency Ordinance. Compliance with the GMA will = a further ensure that Tukwila will have its Transportation Element certified by the Puget Z Sound Regional Council (PSRC). 1, O zi— w Other options for consideration would be: ? o • Delay consideration of amendments until the next amendment cycle since the State o co has extended its deadline until 12/01/04. a E- • Implement GMA- required housekeeping changes only = v — • No action. u_ .. z 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what v result can be expected and why? p ►— The proposed change would bring a net benefit to the community through clearer z assessment of traffic conditions and expectations for future improvements. Updating the Concurrency Ordinance ensures that potential growth considered in local financial and capital improvement planning. Denying the proposed change potentially brings Tukwila out of compliance with State GMA requirements and jeopardizes transportation - related funding. CONCLUSIONS Amending the Comprehensive Plan to revise certain policies in the Transportation Element will ensure that Tukwila's Plan complies with statewide requirements and remains eligible for transportation - related funding. This amendment will also ensure that the concurrency portion of the Transportation Element is up to date. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends no action at this time, but will return to the Planning Commission later in 2002 with specific policy direction . HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance, issued 5/16,02 STAFF: Rebecca Fox L01 -076 ( c) Transit- oriented uses near high- capacity stations STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED MAY 15, 2002 ATTACHMENT C May 23, 2002 Notice published in the Seattle Times, May 10, 2002 L01 -076 (c) City of Department of Community Development Add policy to encourage transit - oriented uses and development patterns near high capacity transit stations Vicinity of high capacity transit stops including S. 154 Longacres commuter rail and others Regional Commercial (RC) at S. 154; Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) at Longacres Regional Commercial (RC) at S. 154; Tukwila Urban Center at Longacres (TUC) -1- : VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The City of Tukwila requests an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to allow the following policy be added to Chapter 13 Transportation element: 13.4.15 Encourage transit - oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations. Surrounding Uses Various commercial Background King County's Countywide Planning Policies support compact development in urban areas, and especially in urban centers. In working with Sound Transit in routing light rail and in planning for commuter rail development in the Tukwila Urban Center, the City of Tukwila recognizes that each station is likely to draw large numbers of individuals, automobiles, as well as interest from developers. Focusing growth around transit stations is a way to capitalize on public transit investments to help produce local and regional benefits. Encouraging transit - oriented uses and development patterns could potentially provide many benefits as the Tukwila Urban Center develops and Tukwila International Boulevard redevelops. These include: • Providing a focal point for concentrating growth • Increasing housing density and mix of use • Supporting pedestrian mobility, bicycle use and transit use; • Increasing Tukwila's economic activity, property values and tax base; • Improving air quality and other environmental concerns due to reduced auto use. REVIEW CRITERIA FINDINGS Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear compliance with the criteria which follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? L01 -076 (c) Transit- oriented uses near high- capacity stations -2- Chapter 13 deals with overall transportation issues. Goal 13.4 Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare and Personal Rapid Transit calls for "Efficient transit capacity that will reduce single- occupancy vehicle trips to, from and through Tukwila and provide public transportation for Tukwila residents who depend on it." z Chapter 10 deals with the Tukwila Urban Center. Policy 10.1.1 says to "Recognize the i t= Tukwila Urban Center as a regional commercial /industrial and limited mixed use w rx residential area, whose growth must be nurtured in a motor - vehicle oriented market 6 D environment with a balance of pedestrian and transit facilities. This future development v p area shall allow a market -driven transition in uses and intensities." The statement that the TUC is to be "nurtured in a motor - vehicle oriented market with a balance of pedestrian w 1 and transit facilities" seems inconsistent with the proposed policy which encourages N o "transit- oriented development." The proposed policy is consistent with existing Policy W 10.1.1 since it "encourages" rather than "requires" this development to occur. � Policy 10.1.2 states "Public /private investment shall facilitate and encourage overall = 0 growth in the Tukwila Urban Center (e.g. Tukwila Pond Park development and transit, F-- z z ~ street, and roadside improvements)." This statement is consistent with "encouraging" F- O transit - oriented development, and is enhanced by the inclusion of the new policy. lz h ui Policy 8.2.1 (Pacific Highway Chapter) which calls to "Mitigate transportation impacts o associated with regional travel by the use of extensive amenities, transit service and 01-- appropriate siting of new uses, including the highway itself." Compact, transit - oriented H v development could mitigate impacts of regional travel. P —0 .z Existing policies deal indirectly with transit - oriented development. Adopting a policy v co which specifically encourages transit - oriented development is a desirable means to P " support this use. z 2. Impacts The proposed amendment would limit potential negative impacts arising from having diffuse, sprawling development. Having denser development patterns near transit stops would assist the TUC in meeting the Countywide Planning Policies Urban Center Criteria including: 1. increased employment densities (15,000 employees within one -half mile i.e. walking distance of a transit center), 2. an average of 50 employees per gross acres, 3. an average of 15 households per gross acre, 4. and an emphasis on mass transportation and non - motorized does while lessening dependency on single occupancy vehicles. Transit - oriented, compact development would assist the Tukwila Urban Center in becoming a vibrant urban center, and would also enhance redevelopment along Tukwila International Boulevard. LO1 -076 ( c) Transit - oriented uses near high- capacity stations -3- A policy encouraging transit - oriented land uses and development patterns would support the construction of additional compact mixed use, pedestrian- oriented projects. This would result in more "infill" development with higher- density buildings located closer to transit stops and commercial and residential uses near employment areas. Transit - oriented development patterns near stations would support fast, frequent, all -day services z and vice versa. Encouraging transit - oriented development near high capacity transit would begin to address ongoing issues such as low employment densities, limited re 2 residential development, and the need for better pedestrian linkages between buildings 6 JU and transit stops. 0 0 to 0 cn 3. Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? J What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? o We believe that the proposed change is the best means to address the identified public w need for transit - oriented development near high capacity transit stations. u. Other possible options would be to: = d • Rely on existing Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.2.1 with its general direction to mitigate transportation impacts in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor 0 through extensive amenities; W u ' uj • Rely existing Zoning Code (Chapter 18.56, Section 18.56.100 Unspecified Uses) 0 with the DCD Director determining requirements for off - street parking facilities in 0 the case of uses not specifically mentioned o E — • Revise design review guidelines to require transit - oriented uses near high capacity = - 0 transit stations; L I 1 • Include specific development requirements to stipulate "transit- oriented uses" in the z vicinity of high capacity transit in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Plan. U O 1— 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what z result can be expected and why? The proposed changed will benefit the community by clarifying the City of Tukwila's commitment to and preference for transit - oriented development near high capacity transit. While the proposed policy "encourages" rather than "requires" transit - oriented development, the community would benefit from the increased likelihood that compact, mixed -use (i.e. transit - dependent) projects would be built near high capacity transit stations. CONCLUSIONS The Planning Commission pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 2.36.030 hereby makes the following conclusions: Encouraging transit - oriented development near high capacity transit emphasizes its importance from Tukwila's point of view to potential developers and funding agencies. Encouraging, rather than requiring this type of development enables market forces to function, while indicating that compact, mixed -use, pedestrian - friendly development will enable the Tukwila Urban Center and Tukwila International Boulevard areas to reach their fullest potential. LO1 -076 (c) Transit - oriented uses near high - capacity stations -4- RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to include the following policy: 13.4.15 Encourage transit - oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations. L01 -076 ( c) Transit- oriented uses near high- capacity stations - 5 - HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: STAFF: LO1 -076 (d) Adequate parking near transit STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED MAY 10, 2002 Rebecca Fox - 1- ATTACHMENT D May 23, 2002 Notice published in the Seattle Times, May 10, 2002 L01 -076 (d) City of Department of Community Development Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with high capacity transit be adequately sized to prevent spillover Vicinity of high capacity transit stops including S. 154th , Longacres commuter rail and others Regional Commercial (RC) at S. 154; Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) at Longacres Regional Commercial (RC) at S. 154; Tukwila Urban Center at Longacres (TUC) SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance issued 5/15/02 FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The City of Tukwila requests a Comprehensive Plan amendment adding a new policy to Chapter 13 Transportation element as follows: 13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking into residential neighborhoods or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property Surrounding Uses Various commercial. Background Tukwila's Zoning Code provides no specific requirements for parking associated with a Park - and -Ride lot or other transit facility. Chapter 18.56 (Off - Street Parking and Loading Regulations) Section 18.56.100 (Uses not specified) states that the Planning Director has jurisdiction set the requirements for off - street parking facilities for uses (such as Park - and -Ride or high capacity transit stations) not specifically mentioned in the Code. Spill -over parking has been a problem in neighborhoods adjacent to Park n' Ride lots. To avoid this problem, it is necessary to expand on what is written in the Zoning Code. Therefore, we are seeking a Comprehensive Plan amendment which will specify that parking facilities developed for transit shall be adequately sized and managed. REVIEW CRITERIA Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear compliance with the criteria which follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? This issue is dealt with only indirectly in the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 13 deals with overall transportation issues. Goal 13.4 Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare and Personal Rapid Transit calls for "Efficient transit capacity that will reduce single - occupancy vehicle trips to, from and through Tukwila and provide public transportation for Tukwila residents who depend on it. LO1 -076 (d) Adequate parking near transit - 2— The need to limit potential impacts associated with regional travel is alluded to in Policy 8.2.1 (Pacific Highway Chapter) which calls to "Mitigate transportation impacts associated with regional travel by the use of extensive amenities, transit service and appropriate siting of new uses, including the highway itself." Z Chapter 10 discusses the Tukwila Urban Center. Policy 10.2.6 Parking calls to "Improve t' w cc 2 existing parking policies and regulations to endure a supply of parking for visitors, employees, and businesses. Ongoing needs shall also be assessed to ensure adequate v v o parking requirements encourage efficient and effective use of land in parking design, and co o do not preclude a less auto - dependent development pattern in the future. Standards for J the development of parking areas shall also examine screening, landscaping, and corner cn site parking relationships." w 0 2. Impacts u_ CO d By requiring adequate parking near transit facilities, the City acknowledges the potential ~ _ for overflow impacts on adjacent property. Potential impacts of providing insufficient ? !— parking for transit facilities include spillover parking in the adjacent areas and w o insufficient parking for residents and businesses. It may also be necessary to address 2 spillover parking through issuing tickets or developing a parking permit system. v O — o e- 3. Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? = w What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? We believe that the proposed change is the best means to address the identified public — O need for adequate parking to service transit uses. v Other options would be to: z • Rely on Policy 8.2.1 with its general direction to mitigate transportation impacts in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor through extensive amenities; • Rely on the Zoning Code (Chapter 18.56, Section 18.56.100 Unspecified Uses) 4. Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what result can be expected and why? The proposed changed will benefit the community by ensuring that adequate parking is provided to accommodate demand generated by high capacity transit stations. Neighboring areas will be spared the negative impacts of overflow parking from the station. Police will not be required to ticket violators' cars. The neighborhood will not need to have (and the City will not need to administer) residential "parking zones." CONCLUSIONS The Planning Commission pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 2.36.030 hereby makes the following conclusions: Requiring adequate parking facilities will make clear Tukwila's intention that the demand for parking spaces generated by high capacity transit stations will be met on -site, rather L01 -076 (d) Adequate parking near transit - 3— L01 -076 (d) Adequate parking near transit - 4— than through parking on neighborhood streets, or via unauthorized parking on nearby private property. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to include the following policy: 13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking in residential neighborhoods or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property. :c.,vil'it' - • �.'t%�sfi�ti� � YIS.a Y�: S :'r6an;S,:,.;C,m:� -�• Rebecca Fox - RE: Another public hearir--iotice for July 19 publication - Pa9e 1 From: "McGhee, Leonard" <mcgheel @soundtransit.org> To: 'Rebecca Fox' <rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 7/17/02 8:56PM Subject: RE: Another public hearing notice for July 19 publication Thanks Rebecca Original Message From: Rebecca Fox [mailto:rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:24 PM To: Mcgheel @soundtransit.org Subject: Fwd: Another public hearing notice for July 19 publication Leonard- - There will be a public hearing on the transit - related proposed amendments on 8/5/02 at 7 p.m. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us Rebecca Fox City of Tukwila 6200 South Center Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Enclosure STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 906 Columbia St. SW • PO Box 48350 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8350 • (360) 725 -2800 Tuesday, May 28, 2002 ®,a Sincerely, Ike Nwankwo Growth Management Planner Growth Management Services R ECEIVED MAY 2 9 2002 DE E OPMENT Re: Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Ms. Fox: Thank you for sending this department your draft comprehensive plan amendment. Proposed amendments that revise transportation element to accommodate future amendments, change designation from low density residential to commercial for certain property, encourage transit - oriented development and adequate parking near transit stations. We received the notice on May 21, 2002 and forwarded a copy of the notice to other state agencies. If you have not sent the plan to the agencies on the list (enclosed) , please do so. We will forward all comments from other state agencies to you. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 725 -3056. AGENCIES REVIEWING COMP PLANS Revised March 28, 2002 Cities and counties need to send their draft comprehensive plans to the agencies' representatives, as listed below, at least 60 days ahead of adoption. Adopted plans should be sent to the Washington State Office of Community Development (OCD) immediately upon publication, as well as to any state agencies that commented on the draft plan. A jurisdiction does not need to send its plan to the agencies which have been called ahead and that have indicated the local plan will not be reviewed. Linda Glasier Department of Corrections Post Office Box 41112 Olympia, Washington 98504-1112 (360) 753 -6547 Fax: (360) 586 -8723 Email: Icglasier @docl .wa.gov Lorinda Anderson Interagency Committee on Outdoor Recreation Post Office Box 40917 Olympia, Washington 98504 -0917 (360) 902 -3009 Fax: (360) 902 -3026 Email: lorindaa @iac.wa.gov Rex Derr Parks and Recreation Commission Post Office Box 42653 Olympia, Washington 98504 -2653 (360) 902 -8504 Fax: (360) 753 -1594 Email: rexd @parks.wa.gov Elizabeth McNagny Department of Social and Health Services Post Office Box 45848 Olympia, Washington 98504 -5848 (360) 902 -8164 Fax: (360) 902 -7889 Email: mcnagec @dshs.wa.gov Bill Wiebe Department of Transportation Post Office Box 47300 Olympia, Washington 98504 -7370 (360) 705 -7965 Fax: (360) 705 -6813 Email: wiebeb @wsdot.wa.gov Environmental Documents Reviewer Department of Health Division of Drinking Water Post Office Box 47822 Olympia, Washington 98504 -7822 (360) 236 -3111 Fax: (360) 236 -2252 S: \GMU \Lists for GMU \State Agencies Reviewing Comp Plans.doc Last Updated March 28, 2002 Lori Ochoa Department of Ecology Post Office Box 47600 Olympia, Washington 98504 -7600 (360) 407 -6422 Fax: (360) 407 -6904 Email: loch461461@ecy.wa.gov Millard Deusen Department of Fish and Wildlife Post Office Box 43155 Olympia, Washington 98504 -3155 (360) 902 -2562 Fax: (360) 902 -2946 Email: deusemsd @dfw.wa.gov Anne Sharar Department of Natural Resources Post Office Box 47001 Olympia, Washington 98504 -7001 (360) 902 -1739 Fax: (360) 902 -1776 Email: anne.sharar @wadnr.gov Tim Ransom Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team Post Office Box 40900 Olympia, WA 98504 -0900 (360) 407 -7323 Fax: (360) 407 -7333 Email: transom @psat.wa.gov Holly Gadbaw (2 comp plans) Washington State Office of Community Development Post Office Box 48350 Olympia, Washington 98504 -8350 (360) 725 -3048 Fax: (360) 753 -2950 Email: hollyg @cted.wa.gov ' Rebecca Fox - Re: LDR and house at golf course Page 1' From: Tom Pulford To: Jill Mosqueda; Rebecca Fox Date: 5/24/02 10:08AM Subject: Re: LDR and house at golf course Actually the old park maintenance office aka "Green House" at 13480 or so Interurban is in C /LI zone. There is the rental "Log House" also on park land on 140th in LDR. Unfortunately all the park lands have been thrown into LDR instead of their own zone. Both are eventually slated to be demo'd or removed. There is no long range plan for the 140th property. That property was purchased with open space funds under the auspices of a river trail linkage but a trail through and active golf course presents a liability. (Known inhouse as another Don William's Land Grab using public funds). The residential land use will go away. If any thing happens with the Bus Barn project or if the uses at George Long consolidate it may only end up a dead end trail parklette. »> Jill Mosqueda 05/24/02 09:35AM »> I am guessing the house in LDR that you left the message about is the one by the golf course club house and that this question is prompted by the comp. plan amendment (rezone by George Long)? If so, here is what I know. The City owns the house and it was used as offices. I believe it is vacant at this time, may be not. If this is the house, then Tom Pulford, THE facilities guy extra ordinaire can answer other questions. If not the location you are thinking of, then we can talk on Tuesday. Jill of..1 a �._ �.,,i .u'� �Y.w<M4l ' �1w�YYM1O +i.s[ifit�.{e.bY�X3tdatA�t..3 IGUNDTRANSiT May ` '002 David Livermore. Ciiai=an Tukwila Planning Commission City of T'Llk-w1la 52'0 Southcznter Blvd. Tukwila. '/V 93133 Dear.\/Jr. T' ;v=ore: This letter pas keen OrCparcd 'o provide written comment on the amendments 7o the Tukwila Comprehensive )Ian. ` Wc support City of 7LIk,,v'la 1 3 cc>*r- to i--,ene,it trOm the 'nv-styne-is ",ound 7-ans'-L is making 'n :he `,V,[h -?-ZarCs "0 =ac`t-/ transit and -o!e shaping i esirabie 'Lind .ise around ' :is st ons. We aiso surmori measures 'o -inde-irabie 'impacts associated ne y aied wlih our transit facilities and look oi-,vard to pari -nn- with the C t I and others in making 'hose Faciiiciel- assets COr :/otjrcomrnuritl/ as ,,velll as the re `ion. "�ilo%v*na 7roocso,j arnencirneni on t-aciiii es. ,,ve offe- -,he �G i iollOW11712 :;Omrnerlls: 6i): ReC"uire "hat ieveiooed in conizmc:ion with ;'zi-h CGlDClCiIV :ransit ,'m cRiequately, w ,,-,revenr s,o Hover. facilities developed in .; ,,)niunction wlih Sound Transit facilities are one of the ways Sound ransit provices, access to its transit system. Pedestrian )US dccclls, 01 cycle access a Transit other ways Sound I.-ansit provides 'balanced access m an attempt to address ,il modes. In all instanc2s, paratransit i ided at these stations and most include passenger drop off areas as access is orovi passenger proposed Link �,,,`h Street -Station, airport shuttle ,Veil. In the case of the -1ink S. access will also be Provided. Where parking facilities are provided in conjunction with high capacity 7ransit :cervices It is not practical or economicailv feasible to provide a facility sizeable enough to prevent spillover. Understanding 7 nderstandinz that the potential --,-,Ists, Sound Transit includes in its mitigation oian, measures that assess the potential for spillover parking impacts on a case basis. The mitigation plan also provides for the implementation of specific actions 10 mitigate those impacts, if any. central Puget Sound legional Transit authority Union Station 101 S. ad(son St. Seattle. 'NA 98104-ZK6 leception '06-3985000 :acsimile '06.3985199 —.sounatrnnsic.or^ Since parking facilities can not be sized large enough to prevent spillover, we feel that the existing policies in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code are adequate to address the parking needs of high capacity transit systems. We feel that a case by case approach appropriate and prudent especially for those systems that are classified as essential public facilities. Alternatively, we would propose a revision to the propose parking policy as follows: "Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with high capacity transit systems be designed to provide balanced modes of access to the extent practical and economically feasible and work with local jurisdictions and the community to reduce the potential for spillover parking. Thank you Sincerely, Leonard Mc ee Project Manager Link Light Rail Department c. Steve Lancaster HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: SEPA DETERMINATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED MAY 6, 2002 L01-076 City of Department of Community Development Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with high capacity transit be adequately sized to prevent spillover Vicinity of high capacity transit stops including S. 154th , Longacres commuter rail and others Regional Commercial (RC) at S. 154; Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) at Longacres Regional Commercial (RC) at S. 154; Tukwila Urban Center at Longacres (TUC) Rebecca Fox r. wua; K. �i: i_ ii .iT::wic: �a!a• ":. ._ :r;.. <zr.:."�,r. .�.�::= to.::�xre'�snw. iii :n',i�3.:;iiat;• FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description The City of Tukwila requests a Comprehensive Plan amendment to encourage transit - oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations Surrounding Uses *1/ Is /r) - &? 2 Background In working with Sound Transit in developing routing for light rail and in planning for commuter rail development in the Tukwila Urban Center, the City of Tukwila has sought to bring benefits of high capacity transit to the city. Since the proposed S. 154`'' Street stop is the interim terminus of the light rail line and since the commuter rail stop serves the region, each station is likely to draw large numbers of individuals coming from out of the area. Most will come in automobiles, which will remain parked for the day while the owner takes the train or light rail. In addition, busses will transport riders from the S. 154 station to SeaTac airport. Tukwila's Zoning Code provides no specific requirements for parking associated with a Park - and -Ride lot. Chapter 18.56 (Off - Street Parking and Loading Regulations) Section 18.56.100 (Uses not specified) states that the Planning Director has jurisdiction set the requirements for off - street parking facilities foruses (such as Park - and -Ride or high capacity transit stations) not specifically mentioned in the Code. To expand on what is written in the Zoning Code in order to avoid the type of spill -over parking in the neighborhood which has occurred adjacent to Park n' Ride lots, we are seeking a Comprehensive Plan amendment which will specify that parking facilities shall be adequately sized. REVIEW CRITERIA Planning Commission review is required for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, recommend approval with conditions or recommend denial of the amendment based on a clear compliance with the criteria which follow. The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which will make the final decision. 1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? : �a: ?aa +:.c>e: -,:ti ...7'� " +hta, Chapter 13 deals with overall transportation issues. Goal 13.4 Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare and Personal Rapid Transit calls for "Efficient transit capacity that will reduce single- occupancy vehicle trips to, from and through Tukwila and provide public transportation for Tukwila residents who depend on it. The need to limit potential impacts associated with regional travel is alluded to in Policy 8.2.1 (Pacific Highway Chapter) which calls to "Mitigate transportation impacts associated with regional travel by the use of extensive amenities, transit service and appropriate siting of new uses, including the highway itself." The possible negative impacts of high- capacity transit stations on adjoining areas is not adequately addressed. We believe that there is a need for an additional policy to address these potential impacts and to specify adequately -sized parking facilities. 2) Impacts The proposed amendment would limit potential negative impacts arising from having inadequate parking for high capacity transit stations. 3) Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? We believe that the proposed change is the best means to address the identified public need for adequate parking to service high capacity transit stations. Other possible options would be to: • Rely on Policy 8.2.1 with its general direction to mitigate transportation impacts in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor through extensive amenities; • Revise design review guidelines to include parking requirements for high capacity transit stations; • Include specific parking requirements addressing high capacity transit in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Plan. • Rely on the Zoning Code (Chapter 18.56, Section 18.56.100 Unspecified Uses) • Deny the request. 4) Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what result can be expected and why? The proposed changed will benefit the community by ensuring that adequate parking is provided to accommodate demand generated by high capacity transit stations. Neighboring areas will be spared the negative impacts of overflow parking from the station. Police will not be required to ticket violators' cars. The neighborhood will not need to have (and the City will not need to administer) residential "parking zones." CONCLUSIONS The Planning Commission pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 2.36.030 hereby makes the following conclusions: Requiring adequate parking facilities will make clear Tukwila's intention that the demand for parking spaces generated by high capacity transit stations will be met on -site, rather than through parking on neighborhood streets, or via unauthorized parking on nearby private property. Other policy options include: z • Deny the request and rely on the existing Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan policies; 6 • Revise design guidelines to include parking for high capacity stations; 0 o • Amend the Zoning Code to specify parking requirements for high capacity transit. w J RECOMMENDATION u- Staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to include the following policy: W0 13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be 1 Q . adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking in residential neighborhoods D. or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property. w I z � . F- 0 z I—. O -' fn W W I U LL O . w z U- H 0 z Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I 1--- ,52. -/G HEREBY DECLARE THAT: 2 Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: i_121 -Or Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: If b ezi - Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail:. Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /On day of /-.1/J y' i n the year 200 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM w Project Name: C,Irt lva4c1/41, Project Number: i_121 -Or Mailer's Signature: pei/2-6:i , . Person requesting mailing: If b ezi - Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /On day of /-.1/J y' i n the year 200 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM May 8, 2002 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment to: 1) change the designation of City -owned property located along Interurban Avenue between South 139` St. and S. 140 St. from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI); and, 2) remove the Public Recreation Overlay from the property. (File #L01 -076) The City of Tukwila Planning Commission will review the boundary between Low Density Residential (LDR) adjacent to Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI) in the vicinity of Interurban Avenue South between S. 139 St. and S. 140 St. This is will include consideration of a change in designation of a parcel owned by the City of Tukwila, and the lifting of the Public Recreation Overlay on the parcel in order to provide maintenance and parking facilities for school buses owned by the Tukwila School District. (See map on reverse) The Tukwila Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to give residents and businesses an opportunity to comment on the proposal. After the hearing, the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the Tukwila City Council. There will be an additional opportunity to comment on this proposal before the City Council. Public Hearing Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:00 p.m. The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendments from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Tukwila Department of Community Development at (206)431 -3683 or rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions or would like additional information about this proposal. Comments may be submitted prior to May 23, 2002 via e-mail or addressed to the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 r'• SUBJECT PROPERTY L01 -076 (a) LDR TO C /LI on Interurban Avenue between S. 139th St. & S 140th St. OFFICIALS: BID AWARD: PUBLIC HEARING: TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL March 18, 2002 Tukwila City Hall - Council Chambers REGULAR MEETING — 8:17 p.m. (immediately following a Special COW meeting) CALL TO ORDER /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Calling the meeting to order at 8:17 p.m., Steven M. Mullet, Mayor, led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Calling the roll of Council was Bob Baker, Deputy City Clerk. Present were Councilmembers Joe Duffle; Joan Hernandez; Pam Carter; Jim Haggerton; and Dave Fenton. Absent was Council President Richard Simpson. DUFFIE MOVED; HERNANDEZ SECONDED; TO EXCUSE THE ABSENCE OF COUNCIL PRESIDENT SIMPSON. The motion carried 6 -0. John McFarland, City Administrator; Bob Noe, City Attorney; David St. Pierre, Assistant City Attorney; Bruce Fletcher, Parks and Recreation Director; and Jim Morrow, Public Works Director. CITIZEN COMMENT /CORRESPONDENCE: None. CONSENT AGENDA: a. Approval of Minutes — March 4, 2002 — Regular Meeting b. Approval of Vouchers — 234759- 235060, in the amount of $820,116.45 HERNANDEZ MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED. The motion carried 6 -0. Award a contract to C. A. Goodman Construction Company, in the amount of $42,595.20, including Washington State Sales Tax, for construction of the Christensen Road Water Line Extension FENTON MOVED; LINDER SECONDED; TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO C. A. GOODMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,595.20, INCLUDING WASHINGTON STATE SALES TAX, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHRISTENSEN ROAD WATER LINE EXTENSION. The motion carried 6 -0. An ordinance clarifying and updating zoning code provisions regulating the use of cargo containers as accessory buildings AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1758 AND 1976, AND CHAPTERS 18.06, 18.10, 18.12, 18.14, 18.24, 18.26, 18.28, 18.30, 18.50 AND 18.70 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE, TO CLARIFY AND UPDATE ZONING CODE PROVISIONS REGULATING THE USE OF CARGO CONTAINERS AS ACCESSORY BUILDINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Nora Gierloff, Senior Planner, presented the newly- created draft ordinance to Council. At the February 11 COW meeting, Council provided direction to City staff to amend the proposed ordinance relative to siting of cargo containers. Since that last time Council reviewed this issue, Department of Community Development staff has received two telephone calls. One telephone caller spoke in favor of allowing cargo containers as long as they "are not junky." The other caller spoke in favor of allowing food banks to qualify for use, even if in residential neighborhoods. 8:32 p.m. Mayor Mullet opened the public hearing. FE.CEtVED APR -2 2002 ..EVES OPMENT Anna Bernhard, 14241 — 59th Avenue South, Tukwila, spoke against the use of cargo containers in anyone's front yard. She spoke in favor of siting them in back yards, with fencing to hide them. City of Tukwila City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Joe Tice, 3629 South 137th, Tukwila, representing the Tukwila Pantry, spoke in favor of allowing cargo containers being used for a proposed regional food bank, here in Tukwila. He noted two would be required on site for the anticipated amount of food. Gregory Johnson, 4917 South 164th, Tukwila, owns a cargo container and spoke in their favor. William Schmidt, 12924 E. Marginal Way South, Tukwila, spoke in favor of the use of cargo containers, so long as they are aesthetically pleasing. He stated they are an inexpensive form of storage which most can afford. Joanne McManus, Tukwila resident, noted when people are in need of food, they are generally referred to St. Thomas Church or the Church By the Side of the Road. She did not know of Mr. Tice's intention to apply for a Regional Food Bank license. 8:42 p.m. Mayor Mullet closed the public hearing. Council deliberations took place with Council speaking in favor of creating a use category" for foodbanks, as they do not currently exist within the TMC; 2. Considering (further) the potential sizes of the containers to be allowed; and 3. including a no stacking" policy when within residential neighborhoods. Based on Council's decision during deliberation, this matter was remanded to staff for additional, draft language to the proposed ordinance. OLD BUSINESS: a. An ordinance adopting the King County 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan FENTON MOVED; UNDER SECONDED; READING OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, BY TITLE ONLY. The motion carried 6 -0. City Attorney Bob Noe read the title of the proposed ordinance. FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, AS PRESENTED. The motion carried 6 -0. APPROVED ORDINANCE #1988 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2001 KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE b. Public Meeting: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Page 2 of 4 March 18, 2002 Having already heard from City staff during a COW meeting (earlier tonight), Mayor Mullet called for public input/testimony. Rebecca Fox, Associate Planner, was on hand to answer inquiries from citizens, staff and Council. As it relates to L01 -075 & L01 -078, the following spoke: Gregory Johnson, applicant, for 101 -075 & 101 -078, spoke in favor of revising the comprehensive plan and zoning code maps to change LRD to C/LI at 13136 — 48th Avenue South. John Gustafson, 4425 — 178th Avenue Court E, (no City specified), spoke in favor of the Gregory Johnson application for rezone. Betty Gully, 13017 — MacAdam Road South, Tukwila, noted 42nd Avenue South is formally known (now) as MacAdam Road and should be referred to as such. Additionally, Ms. Gully spoke against "eating away at" single family housing. Ms. Gully then read a letter into the record from former Tukwila Councilmember Allan Ekburg, speaking against the proposed change by Petitioner, Gregory Johnson. Brad White, 13429 — 43rd Avenue South, Tukwila, on behalf of his wife and himself, spoke against "converting the property" at 13136 — 42nd Avenue South. He stated the proposed shifting of the property in question into the C/LI category will upset the boundary; and breaks the natural separation that currently exists between the commercial and residential uses in their neighborhood. s: ��t::�?�:?;�::�ic.�:a " cu.^ �r' 3r;± �za ,:'•`,�;�= w�`,�~`;Gu'�«sefxa�; City of Tukwila City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Robert Jensen, 11682 — 44th Avenue South, Tukwila, spoke against the proposed re -zone. Page 3 of 4 March 18, 2002 Gregory Johnson, 6306 — 151st Avenue Court, KPN, Key Center, WA, (applicant) spoke in favor of the proposed changes. Rebecca Fox presented Council with copies of two e-mails received by the City before this evening's public hearing. One e-mail was from Nadine Morgan, Tukwila resident, who is opposed to the change of zoning from residential to that of Light Industrial. The other e -mail, from Michelle Roedell, Tukwila resident, spoke against the proposed rezoning classification as it would lower the value of the nearby homes. No citizen comment was received relative to proposed amendment #2, #3, #4 and #5. As it relates to considering appropriate boundaries for C/LI adjacent to LDR Zoning in the vicinity of South 135th Street and 48th Avenue South: Betty Gully, 13017 — MacAdam Road South, Tukwila, noting the item was deferred from last year, was opposed to it then and is opposed to it now. Michelle Evans, o /b /o Holaday Parks, spoke in favor of the rezone. Holaday Parks has been in Tukwila 12 years and they would like to expand their operations. She noted there is no residential housing on this property. Jeff Weber, Attorney at Law, for Holaday Parks, also spoke in favor of the rezone. He asked Council to consider sending this item to the Planning Commission. The intent is to develop parcels into integrated projects. Ted Dixson, 420 W. Harrison, Seattle, (architect), noted the parcels are currently zoned like a checkerboard. Should Council vote in favor of a revision, it would correct the situation. Gregory Johnson, 4917 So. 164th, Tukwila, (not the applicant above) noted that he owns a cargo container and it's strategically placed in his yard as a result of bad buffering on behalf of the City, with the current zoning. As it relates to the proposed rezone of City property, Parcel No. 00200006: Joanne McManus, calling this a "bad idea" due to traffic, spoke against the proposal. Anna Bernhard called this a "very poor idea" and stated Interurban is beginning to "be nicer." She encouraged Council not to send this forward to the Planning Commission for consideration. As it relates to the proposed allowance of Office in MIC areas, no citizen comment was received. Upon hearing from community members, City Councilmembers discussed and deliberated each of the eight proposals to determine whether or not they should be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. AS IT RELATES TO: Refer to Planning Commission or Reject 1. LO1 -075 & L01 -078 Reject Revise Comp. Plan and Zoning Code Maps to Change LDR to C/LI at 13136 — 48TH AVENUE SOUTH 2. Revise Transportation Background Report, Concurrency Ordinance and Refer Associated Comprehensive Plan Policies as Appropriate 3. Update Sensitive Areas Ordinance to Include "Best Available Science" Refer per GMA Requirements 4. Encourage Transit - Related Uses Near High Capacity Transit Stations Refer 5. Require Adequately -Sized Parking Facilities Near Transit Stations To Prevent Spillover onto Private Property 6. Consider Appropriate Boundaries for C/LI adjacent to LDR Zoning in the Vicinity of South 135th Street and 48th Avenue South 7. Proposed Rezone of City Property, Parcel No. 002800006 8. Proposed allowance of Office in MIC Refer Reject Refer Refer City of Tukwila ~� City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 9:54 p.m. LINDER MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO TAKE A FAVIE MINUTE BREAK. The motion carried 6 -0. 10:01 p.m. Mayor Mullet reconvened the regular meeting. MISCELLANEOUS: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director, informed Council that a request has been received (from the contractor) to close South 180th Street the first week in April. Details are being discussed and the request is being reviewed. More information will follow. DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; APPROVAL TO RECESS THE REGULAR MEETING AND CONVENE THE EXECUTIVE SESSION. The motion carried 6 -0. EXECUTIVE SESSION: - Personnel Issues — 45 minutes — Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(g) 10:01 p.m. 10:22 p.m. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT: 10:23 p.m. DUFFIE MOVED; CARTER SECONDED; TO ADJOURN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION; RECONVENE AND ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING. The motion carried 6 -0. Executive session began. Executive session ended. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Y`. -(- L.c __... Robert H. Baker, Deputy City Clerk Date Minutes Approved: April 1, 2002 Page 4 of 4 March 18, 2002 DUFFIE MOVED; FENTON SECONDED; TO DISPENSE WITH REPORTS. The motion carried 5 -1; with Councilmember Carter voting NO. March 18, 2002 7:00 PM 4. SPECIAL ISSUES Tukwila City Couhcil Benda Steven M. Mullet, Mayor John McFarland, Cihj Administrator Richard Simpson, Council President 5. MISCELLANEOUS 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION 7. ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING 4. BID AWARD • REGULAR MEETING Councilmembers: Pam Carter • Joe Duffle Dave Fenton • Jim Haggerton Joan Hernandez • Pamela Linder SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING 3. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes: 3/4/02 (REGULAR MTG) b. Approval of Vouchers Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. SPECIAL Tukwila Community Schools Collaboration: PRESENTATION Mid- winter break camp. Presented by the Recreation Division. 3. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items that are not COMMENTS/ included on this agenda. If you wish to comment on an item CORRESPONDENCE listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. a. 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. b. Rezone of City property, Parcel No. 0002800006. c. Briefing on Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Please bring notebook distributed separately. Pg.5 Pg.21 Pg.29 Ord #1988 Res #1486 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL 2. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items that are not COMMENTS / included on this agenda. If you wish to comment on an item CORRESPONDENCE listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. Award a contract to C.A. Goodman Construction Company, in Pg.33 the amount of $42,595.20 (including WSST) for construction of the Christensen Road Water Line Extension. (continued...) I. 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND AMENDMENT PROCESS z ` w ce The 2002 Comprehensive Plan amendment process will be addressing amendments 6 D proposed by individuals or by staff. Work on updating the Sensitive Areas Ordinance to v p include "best available science" as required by the State of Washington will follow a u) W separate schedule and will be completed prior to the December, 2004 deadline. w 1 2w Council Consideration Process w o The procedure for City Council review is shown in Exhibit 1. Although certain deadlines g are set by the State, the basic process is similar to the one Tukwila usually follows each "- year in considering Comprehensive Plan amendments. CO d 1--- m w The first step in Council's consideration is to evaluate a proposed amendment according I p to the following review criteria: w ~ • Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? 2 o • If the issue is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a public need for the oo cn proposed change? 01— • Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? i v • Will the proposed change result in a new benefit to the community? u_ ~o iii z Following its initial consideration of a proposed amendment on March 18, 2002, the U Council shall take one of the following actions: z F' • Refer the proposed amendment for further review by the Planning Commission and a recommendation to the City Council; • Defer further Council consideration for one or more years; • Reject the proposed amendment. We are requesting that these "threshold" decisions be made at the conclusion of the public meeting scheduled for March 18, 2002. Timeline Work on updating the Sensitive Areas Ordinance will be completed prior to 12/31/04. We will return to the Council with a more specific schedule. The timeline for other proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment follows: March 2002 City Council briefing City Council public meeting City Council threshold decision/referral to Planning Commission 2 " quarter 2002 Planning Commission Review 4«si gas si, :10: :4 - , .;r 3rd q uarter, 2002 Planning Commission recommendation to City Council City Council Hearing City Council decision z Description of amendments: w re Two proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments applications were 6 submitted for consideration by the December 31, 2001 deadline. One application was v 0 filed by a member of the public and one application by the City of Tukwila. The City of Tukwila's application has several different elements that will be separated into individual tu files once the City Council determines which proposed amendments would be referred on LL. WO to the Planning Commission. Exhibit 2 is a map of proposed amendments, and Exhibit 3 is a summary table of the amendment requests. g Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Designation — submitted by Gregory Johnson = a w • L01 -075 (LDR to C /LI) Comprehensive Plan designation and LO1 -078 (LDR to C /LI) z = Zoning Designation at 13136 42 Ave. S F_ p This proposal was submitted by a property owner who owns two adjacent properties, one w w with Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) zoning and the other with Low Density 0 Residential (L/DR) zoning. The proposal is to amend the Comprehensive Plan and v O Zoning Code Map from LDR to C/LI at 13136 -42 Avenue South so that both properties o F - are C/LI. This property was redesignated to LDR from light industrial during the 1995 = v Comprehensive Plan development. There are some steep slopes at the northern edge. � z Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Submitted by City of Tukwila v • L01 -076 including 01– • Revise the Comprehensive Plan to revise the Transportation z Element / Concurrency Ordinance (Certain parts required by GMA) Staff requests a Comprehensive Plan amendment to accommodate potential policy changes that may be needed as a result of revising the Transportation Element and Concurrency Ordinance. • Revise the Sensitive Areas Element (including Best Available Science)(GMA requirement) Revise Sensitive /Critical areas work to include the State's revised goals and policies for protecting critical areas functions and values. Local governments are required to include the "best available science" in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas and give special consideration to preserving or enhancing anadromous fisheries. • Encourage transit - related uses near high capacity transit stations Staff proposed this amendment in order to address development in the vicinity of the proposed light rail station at S. 154` and Tukwila International Boulevard, as well as to address future transit- oriented development near the commuter rail station located in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) or in other areas. • Require adequately -sized parking facilities near high capacity transit stations Staff proposed this amendment to ensure that there is adequate parking to meet demand near high- capacity transit stations and to ensure that parking impacts do not overflow into adjacent neighborhoods. z ' • Consider appropriate boundaries for C /LI adjacent to LDR Designation (vicinity w of 48` Avenue S. and Macadam Road /S. 13.5 h ) This issue came up in 2000 -2001 when a business /property owner requested a o Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code map change from LDR to C /LI to enable their co existing facility to expand. The City Council deferred the issue from last year's process and also requested consideration of the general topic of with Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning adjacent to Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI). This wO general topic is similar to proposed amendment L01 -075 above. u a co I • Z z _� 1- 0 z �— Exhibit 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Reject Proposal 1 Options for Council Review Threshold Review Process • Refer to Planning Commission Environmental Review Planning Commission Hearing / Recommendation City Council Review / Decision Defer Proposal z _ F- '~ w 0 0 to 0 W = 1.- w0 u Q = • a w z = zo 0 O - . o h- 2 U '. L - L. .z w U I O ~ z Exhibit 3 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Z = �W 6 J 0 CO W W H CO W W O 2 �? = W Z � O Z W W O N O 1— W W I H • O • Z W = 0 1- O Z Proposal (as submitted) Submitted by Background Recommendation 1. Revise Comp Plan and zoning Code maps to change LDR to C /LI at 131V6 48 Avenue South ( #L01 -075 & #L01 -078) ' 2 . ..4 ti A.c /t�LwwA Gregory Johnson Mr. Johnson wants the property changed to Commercial /Light Industrial, which Is the designation of the adjacent property. Mr. Johnson's father owned both properties. Before the 1995 Comprehensive Plan, both properties were designated light industry." The property In question was changed from industrial to low density residential during the Comp Plan adoption review. The adjacent property remains Commercial /Light Industrial. The properties In question contain some environmentally sensitive areas. Refer to the Planning Commission for further review. 2. Revise Transportation Background Report, Concurrency Ordinance and associated Comprehensive Plan policies as appropriate. City of Tukwila Public Works The City of Tukwila requests a Comprehensive Plan amendment to accommodate potential changes which may be needed as the Transportation Element and Concurrency ordinance are updated Refer to Planning Commission for further review 3. Update Sensitive Areas Ordinance to include "Best Available Science" per GMA requirements City of Tukwila Community Development Review of the Growth Management Act's latest requirements has shown that "Best Available Science" must be incorporated into sensitive /critical areas review process. Refer to Planning Commission for further review 4. Encourage transit - related uses near high capacity transit stations City of Tukwila Community Development This proposed amendment gives guidance In development near transit stations Refer to Planning Commission for further review 5. Require adequately -sized parking facilities near transit stations to prevent spillover onto private property City of Tukwila Community Development This proposed amendment gives guidance for parking structures near transit stations Refer to Planning Commission for further review 6. Consider the appropriate boundaries for C /LI adjacent to LDR zoning in the vicinity of S. 135'" St. S. and 48'" Avenue S. City of Tukwila (includes deferred L99 -0094) This issue was initiated last year by a property owner seeking to change the boundary of the C /LI in order to expand a business use. The City Council deferred consideration proposal until consideration in 2002 pending a more general review of the appropriate limits and buffers of the C /LI and LDR zones which are adjacent. (Includes L99 -0095 ) (This general issue is similar to # L01 -075 above) Refer to Planning Commission for further review Exhibit 3 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Z = �W 6 J 0 CO W W H CO W W O 2 �? = W Z � O Z W W O N O 1— W W I H • O • Z W = 0 1- O Z Public meeting to be held regarding Comprehensive Plan amendments The City of Tukwila is beginning its annual consideration of possible changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The Comprehensive Plan contains the broad land use goals and policies that will guide Tukwila for the next 20 years. The Zoning Code carries out the Comprehensive Plan's policies with specific requirements for land development. This year, in addition to Tukwila's regular yearly process, the State of Washington has mandated that all cities also review their Comprehensive Plans to be sure that they are up to date with statewide planning requirements and the Growth Man- agement Act (GMA). The City of Tukwila has submitted one application with several parts. The remaining amendment was proposed by a member of the public. Meeting State requirements will be the focus of this year's update, including the following proposed amendments: ■ Revise Sensitive Areas Ordinance to include "best avail- able science" and update inventory of sites (File #L01 -076, Applicant: City of Tukwila) ■ Revise Transportation Element to update Concurrency Ordinance (File #L01 -076, Applicant: City of Tukwila) Other proposed amendments are as follows: • Change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Commercial /Light Industrial at 13136 42nd Avenue S. (File #L01 -075, Applicant: Gregory Johnson) Storage container issues to be considered by Council You may have noticed that some of your neighbors and local businesses have begun using cargo or shipping containers as storage sheds. The City Council is considering regulations that would limit the use of these containers in all areas of the City except industrial zones. Under the draft regulations: • All existing containers in residential or commercial areas would have to apply for a permit from the City or be removed within one year. • In residential areas, new cargo containers will only be allowed for institutional uses such as schools or hospitals. • New cargo containers may be allowed in commercial zones with a permit. • In order to get a permit, you would have to show that the container was screened from your neighbors and the street and that it met setback distance requirements. 8 • Consider the boundaries for Low Density Residential (LD 1. adjacent to Commercial /Light Industrial (CLI) zoning n S. 135th /Macadam Road and 48th Avenue South (File #L01 -076 , Applicant: City of Tukwila /deferred from 2001) • Revisions to Transportation element to encourage appro- priate development near high - capacity transit stations (File #L01 -076, Applicant: City of Tukwila) To give residents and businesses the opportunity to express opinions about the proposed amendments, there will be a There will be additional opportunities for public input during the spring and summer of 2002. The City of Tukwila wel- comes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code amendments from the residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox of the Tukwila Department of Community Development at 206 - 431 -3683 if you have qt. tions. You may address written comments to the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. If you prefer, you may also comment via e -mail to rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us . • Containers would still be allowed on construction sites in all areas for temporary storage of materials and equipment. The City Council will be holding a public hearing on these changes on Monday, March 18th at 7:00PM, and you are welcome to come and share your thoughts about the issue. For additional details, please call Nora Gierloff in the Department of Community Development at 206 -431 -3670. PUBLIC MEETING 7:00PM — Monday, March 18, 2002 City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard THE HAZELNUT Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review 3/18/02 BS S Cy Er L i KS Council Admin. Public Works Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Request that the City Council add the City owned property located along Interurban Ave between S 139th St and S 140th St with Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes from Residential to Commercial to the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: Move to include rezone with other Comp Plan Amendments N/A Same as sponsor. Jst Impact (if known): Fund Source (if known): Co U rCIL AGENDA SYr:*9PsIs - --- ----- ---- -- Initials - ------ - ----- RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date 3/18/02 Action APPENDICES Meeting Date 3/18/02 Attachments Information Memo dated February 25, 2002 ITEM NO. Special C.O.W. 4 b. a■ . ITEM INFORMATION CAS Number: o ^ o 9 Original Agenda Date: March 18, 2002 Agenda Item Title: Request the Council add Comp Plan and zoning changes to the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Parcel No. 0002800006 ) Original Sponsor: Council Admin. Public Works Timeline: Sponsor's Summary: Request that the City Council add the City owned property located along Interurban Ave between S 139th St and S 140th St with Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes from Residential to Commercial to the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Recommendations: Sponsor: Committee: Administration: Move to include rezone with other Comp Plan Amendments N/A Same as sponsor. Jst Impact (if known): Fund Source (if known): Co U rCIL AGENDA SYr:*9PsIs - --- ----- ---- -- Initials - ------ - ----- RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date 3/18/02 Action APPENDICES Meeting Date 3/18/02 Attachments Information Memo dated February 25, 2002 ITEM NO. Special C.O.W. 4 b. a■ . • EXECUTED at Kliv t / //a .►. _ CITY OF TUKWILA SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS Department of Community Development . 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, IVA 98/88 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E -mail: tukplanRaci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at /3/36 /2-1/d /9be.._ 5 11.JkLA/ for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of ices, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. ss . 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. (city), /i-/ (state), on (Print l-ZS ` 1 t . N � . • ; `G 0'p t\OTAR j° tIU G � : o et :'�v O P w (S tore) On this day personally appeared before me At• t�� , to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/+;lsigned the same as his/liter-voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. (Address) 6 -ate S7 (Phone Number) 8/10102, C-tv s Fs \ 't' c. c_ -- r Y OF, NOTARY PUBLIC in and for he State o Washington residing at -40 e_a0 My Commission expires on •S- necei V , �'C) MAR n2002 MFArr }t1!{»S." ... ^;.tf: s�'!YS;{brTah kl h n „ ` o » �� ° p 107 ? 22 S.. v /s /e N '� d f 0. 2 O1.- /4.16 3/ P ri � m.^ 1..• ..0.0. v t0 O J p.. ° 1tS i • ( / .5.13 ♦ •R B �i Ji+ •5 13iS r Sr I i� �_ ��y, NALLCS '. "33 94 h� 3 n s .. 9 Y C ' ` +N O 0 A Y '4 i• G..I »n Br• 33• L7 II 1'$1.16 • e m rr./r.� �!e o . • a o —� Nq 1 T Z 60 e3 E. � \ I I 8 X19°°�" xvrr t i8 0 1 - I \ t a r u 1 r a rr) , t — Ifr L \ 0, %.,-.) a. v � m I \gi � ^ , t° \ g V q W I 1:13'3 's S - N-1 ( P Y � � I n ay I ' �Iv O 1 .Y 1 .9t'u0$ . .4 u `r� r/� � ! l ,s 5� 2 � ' • e ....Age T l • i a7 J v J8 �i :::: :7:4 4 7 :if . : ,..,,, : .. /...:: . 3 0 , IL a°t Y P N >c ▪ s.s � iao s • /Q Pp, 0 r.r /.# 01.21 A.+ 1 .�. Rs r. 'If — ' 4 f 0 l• f4 . ��--- • = P.O.T,FL /04 OD • 7° 4 .PI✓rlro - I.R;;;oN. or x12.7f/p s ex e. e. / p _ /J f 77-28 �No c • ' ST ry Ra555.37 /$L7$ [w..0. O I R i r .y.,a �.. _ �I 4 _ ��.. .� l / N 89.57 -.57E ▪ 117r llsb' � Ml d iI Z 41 1 A i . Y h / .b^ r T p r• ti ( te c • ±. n Q /h • a• [ 1 \ I 4- -----TV . S. IJ4I t1 o (,IRN Sr. I Z aa5•Z4 /05 �.r - .4 �. - /•' V Ti tr 7 ?p 4 ,Jp I 1 0 `pO a 3: • !05 \ • tv 11L07 LI • 3v 3 I I Z I�~ \ V k I 3 f V KCSP 1083050 8504080' pp ��3o'ROl LSMY /08 : N .( n N k D 5 W. l0 /' N i G 41 y T 0 150 p °� o W l 11.;"1 ry O Vd•°� • • 1 FT) • y i .A t CC 9 • p p1 .1 • � IQ � IC _9214...s p• PZ3.11 • 14.HOo • / ' /tta 6 P 4, a i v 0 • 1910ou " • a • 0 • LL ti • ✓ o 5 ° I h . 1. Q J 1 1 1 �.1� .14 '' t01' e • l /20 A V M 0 o •f� .. c.„ ce. r.° .v ,fib v . ? y 1. * P • 'w • \ . 1 „. 4 dSE 5 171°' ita �. PO 0 9 13 0 A 4 a � Na � �' �y `. t.UiJ 1 CO • sr> 63 Poao90 _= 9 � 1 � S` >' 3 gy CC u w 4' c \ N h9 /� • /1t /� • 0 I • 9 n 915 • , . y + , > ? I7 / b s` ooeCo a � L2 3 0 • 1� V / � �` >> 4.•,, !' \p r4 4.Z. •/Sav <SMr\ i/? L pp I. - 1 i• � \ i �• •- -. nQ • O/1nnO/I I U Jt'i• /9- .o-.Oa u'.J%J i.....r.. •54 A�. oou ii 5 LOT I l7 0 • %/t3 \ *J. n • ►y • . u s'0, . • A 04 ^1Acti • 4. '(J • �s • a7AA5 SK51: ., . W ° o A` . 10 . • . R y. . , the appr ,..rnaz,gar .ipr5.( cro- 5,0 9 `3 1.‘:-.... 1.‘:-.... 43 0 5.1 w • M 1. 10: 0 ' :, la 0 Ilse IN , Z". n • v 1 03 •'4 r '' K. /1 -- - -.00P.':!' I 7 „I:11*w ti iAe• iltIV ,i, i ,. 5 • 1, 87 I • . � � 6 / i ! 4 0 5 5 3q () Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I I. _ HEREBY DECLARE THAT: ` he-O''L Mailer's Signature: 1) • E12-16/(‘ Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this L9 '413. day of Mard in the year 2O 2l P:GINAWYNETI /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: t' ,�t�, ttrtfDin �V Project Number: L) VD-76 Mailer's Signature: 1) • E12-16/(‘ Person requesting mailing: t Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this L9 '413. day of Mard in the year 2O 2l P:GINAWYNETI /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila • AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , 6 Q f0 HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's Signature: 2, - Y rA . Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mai.l: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this Lo ' day offL44 Atin•the year 20732_ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: C.,:t42) to. Project Number: L_D l — b Mailer's Signature: 2, - Y rA . Person requesting mailing: kefaCCIA:CI■ Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this Lo ' day offL44 Atin•the year 20732_ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM z NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING w 6 JU U 0 UU U) L11 J w • 0 g • Q = • a �w Z I- 0 Z E- . The Tukwila City Council will hold a public meeting to give residents and businesses an .o opportunity to comment on the proposal in order to determine if the amendment shall be = u � forwarded to the Planning Commission for further study. There will be additional ♦- opportunities to comment on this proposal in the coming months. z = o � March 4, 2002 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendment to revise the boundary for Low Density Residential (LDR) adjacent to Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI) in the vicinity of 48 Avenue South and Macadam Road (File #L01 -076) The City of Tukwila will review the boundary between Low Density Residential (LDR) adjacent to Commercial/Light Industrial (C /LI) in the vicinity of 48 Avenue South and Macadam Road. This will include consideration of a change in designation of two parcels (one parcel south of 4532 S. 135 St. and one parcel west of 4625 134 Place South) from LDR to C/LI which had been deferred from 2001. (Please refer to map on reverse) Public Meeting Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Monday, March 18, 2002 7:00 p.m. The City of Tukwila welcomes both written and verbal comments about the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendments from Tukwila's residential and business community. Please contact Rebecca Fox, Tukwila Department of Community Development at (206)431 -3683 or rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions or would like additional information about this proposal. Comments may be submitted prior to March 18, 2002 via e -mail or addressed to the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 .,,,,� �"��.,:i;7a ' y�y1M1.(r �. ;r•,'ives4 ',�: .:r et,::•: ,i$1: :? .r''id2 `<:Yy ` c 1r4= . .se.T m reere: IVI vAiM: ww ;2a..f.v..5b4t1WN6"#nz+`�A'.b'�. z Boundary for Low Density Residential (LDR) adjacent to Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI) 0.06 (File# L01 -076) C /LI zoning requested by Holaday Parks in 2000 -2001. Consideration deferred by City Council until 2002. 0 tLw��t�iih� +`•, 0.06 Miles GIS Tukwila To: File From: Rebecca Fox Date; 3/02 Subj: Deferral /denial of L99 -0094 as part of L01 -075 Short Plat L99 -0073 (Ram short plat) was approved between the time that Holaday Parks (L99 -0094) was deferred by the City Council in 3/01 and when it was denied (i.e. not sent on to the Planning Commission) in 3/02. This indicates interest in residential uses in the vicinity. (See also M12000 -164; D01 -232; D01 -230; D01 -231) c ..4`7u,6"a h,:/wC.nr � = Th FORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Director n Date: February 25, 2002 CC..�� z Subject: Rezone of City Property (Parcel adjacent to George Long Shops) H w Parcel No. 0002300006 cc 2 -U 0 0 ISSUE cn o Request that the City Council add the City owned property located along Interurban Avenue between J E- South 139 Street and South 140' Street with Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes from Lu "- w0 Residential to Commercial to the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 2 BACKGROUND U. The City is evaluating the feasibility of providing school bus maintenance and associated parking for = w f- the Tukwila School District at the George Long Shops. The existing maintenance facility site is _ z F- inadequate in size to accommodate school bus parking, maneuvering and circulation. The School I— 0 District anticipates the need for a change of maintenance provider during the latter part of 2002. w ul The City owns a parcel of property adjacent to Interurban Avenue South from south 139 Street to v N South 140 Street. The property is bounded on the north by Seattle City Light and on the east by the p H City's Public Works Maintenance Facility (George Long Shop). All of the City's fleet maintenance w w is performed at this facility. King County Metro operates and maintains a sewage lift station in the H v northwesterly corner of the property. u- 0 w z The parcel is approximately 34,650 square feet in area and is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) c) with a Public Recreation Overlay (PRO). Zoning for properties to the east and south is Commercial p ♦— Light Industrial (C/LI). Zoning for properties to the north, including Foster Golf Course, is LDR Z (PRO). Zoning for properties to the west along Interurban Avenue is Regional Commercial Mixed Use (RCM). The housing nearest the site is an apartment complex located to the north on the westerly side of Interurban Avenue. Single family housing is located several hundred feet westerly of the site beyond the RCM properties. ANALYSIS The current zoning of Parcel 0002800006 does not allow uses that are being contemplated by the City and School District. Rezone of the property to C/LI without PRO would allow land use compatible with the City's maintenance facility operation and long term needs. RECOMMENDATION Add the evaluation of the Comp Plan and Zoning changes of Parcel 0002800006 to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment list for 2002. To: Brian Shelton/Jim Morrow From: Albert Spencer /Tom Pulford Date: January 7, 2002 BACKGROUND Subject: Zoning Impact on Bus Maintenance Project z ISSUE 2 QQ J U In order accommodate the proposed bus maintenance /parking at the George Long Shop v o the intent was to use of the abandoned Maule Avenue and Puget Sound Electric Railway w = directly in front of George Long and parallel to Interurban Avenue. Our concern is that the current zoning for this property, which includes the Golf Course, as low density w o residential (LDR) will preclude us from using the property making the project not 2 feasible. u.¢ = I— m ill Z = F— 0 Low density residential zoning is very restrictive. Schools, recreational uses, including w golf courses, are allowed as conditional uses for LDR. Mass transit facilities are 2 o permitted as an unclassified use. See attachment A for the applicable codes. 8 01— L11 2 H� The LDR zoning is not consistent with adjacent properties, which are zoned as L'" z commercial /light industrial (C/LI) and regional commercial mixed -use (RCM) which v U) would permit the proposed bus operation. Attachment B is a zone map with the property of concern highlighted. z ANALYSIS INFORMATION MEMO The most appropriate solution may be to Re -zone this portion of property as commercial /light industrial consistent with the adjacent property. Short of rezoning the property, an argument could be made that the bus maintenance /parking usage is a combination of both the school and mass transits facilities that are allowed as conditional and unclassified uses respectively. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that senior management address this issue with Community Development before we proceed with awarding the consultant contract. Request your guidance /direction on this matter. Cc: Pat Brodin Bob Giberson Info memo on zoning WASHINGTON TITLE COMPANY 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 120, Renton, Washington 98055 (425)255 -7575 FAX (425)255 -0285 Seattle (206)682 -5269 Real Estate 2000 Corporation 225 Auburn Way North Auburn, WA 98002 Attn: John Gustafson Commitment No. R258092-1 Customer Reference: Johnson Dear John: Effective January 1, 2002, the fee for recorded documents will be as follows: Document Recording Fee: $9.00 - First Page $1.00 - Each Additional Page Map Recording Fees: $55.00 - Base Fee All other recording charges authorized by law remain unchanged. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to provide you with our services. WASHINGTON TITLE COMPANY 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 120, Renton, Washington 98055 (425)255 -7575 FAX (425)255 -0285 (800)215 -8404 1. Policy or policies to be issued: COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE NO. R258092-1 INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: Unit 1 - (425)255 -7472 Seattle (206)682 -5269 Fred Marquiss, Sr. Title Officer Joy Chauvin, Title Assistant Donna Roetter, Assistant Title Officer Effective Date: December 6, 2001 at 8:00 a.m. SCHEDULE A 1992 ALTA Owner's Policy Coverage : Standard Liability : TO BE DETERMINED. PROPOSED BUYER: TO FOLLOW 1992 ALTA Loan Policy Coverage : Extended Liability : TO BE DETERMINED. PROPOSED LENDER: TO FOLLOW The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is a FEE SIMPLE. 3. WASHINGTON TITLE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on the preliminary commitment; Fee simple title to the property described herein is vested, on the date shown above, in: FRANK C. JOHNSON and GREGORY C. JOHNSON, as their separate estates, as joint tenants with right of survivorship subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions, and exceptions contained in the policy form. 1 Customer Reference: Johnson CONTINUED .4« d4tiiiYSY19[tJ4i4?'" •'• ^n�•_ • .. Commitment No. R258092 -1 SCHEDULE A CONTINUED 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: That portion of Tract 48, Riverside Interurban Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page(s) 74, in King County, Washington, lying north of South 133rd Street, east of 42nd Avenue South and south of the south line of South 131st Street (ALSO KNOWN AS 132nd Street) as now established; TOGETHER WITH the west half of vacated 43rd Avenue South adjoining; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for state highway on July 2, 1964 under King County Superior Court Cause Number 618285. END OF SCHEDULE A 2 CONTINUED Commitment No. R258092 -1 SCHEDULE B Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Rights or claims disclosed only by possession, or claimed possession, of the premises. B. Encroachments and questions of location, boundary and area disclosed only by inspection of the premises or by survey. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights -of -way, streets, roads, alleys or highways not disclosed by the public records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. H. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. I. Water rights, claims or title to water. J. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND MR BY DEED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON: RECORDED: July 2, 1964 RECORDING NUMBER: 618285 2. DEED OF TRUST, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Gregory C. Johnson and Frank C. Johnson PRLAP, Inc. Bank of America, N.A. 21000 Northwest Evergreen Parkway, Hillsboro, OR 97124 -7121 6261512989 $150,000.00 June 6, 2001 June 18, 2001 20010618001865 3 CONTINUED i1; s5t a% i id i i c ;vtiifirit ti s'.:rtttv��:aib 3. DEED OF TRUST, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: NOTES: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: GENERAL TAXES: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: SPECIAL DISTRICT: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: Commitment No. R258092 -1 Gregory C. Johnson and Frank C. Johnson First American Title KeyBank National Association P.O. Box 16430, Boise, ID 83715 473101480325 $135,000.00 June 21, 2001 July 23, 2001 20010723000002 END OF SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A. The language contained in the printed Exclusions from coverage and Conditions and Stipulations of the Policy committed for may be examined by inquiry at the office which issued the Commitment, and a specimen copy of the insurance Policy Form(s) referred to in this Commitment will be furnished promptly upon request. B. Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance, or connection charges for sewer, water, electricity or Metro Sewer Treatment Capacity Charge. C. In the event the transaction fails to close and this commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed schedule of this Company. D. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: $2,233.95 $2,233.95 $0.94 $0.94 YEAR: 2001 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 734060 - 0722 -08 LEVY CODE: 2400 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $105,000.00 Improvements: $51,000.00 4 CONTINUED F. G. Commitment No. R258092 E. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of King County Recorders Office is: Ptn Tract 48, Riverside Interurban Tracts, Vol 10/74. The records of King County and/or our inspection indicate that the address of the z improvement located on said land is: _ I'' cc LI- 13136 48th Avenue South 6 D Tukwila, Washington 98168 0 0 A Single Family Residence co 0 in w= J F- co LL , w 2 u_ ¢ i • s H. The Loan Policy to be issued will contain a Form 8.1 (Environmental Protection Lien) z Ili According to the King County Tax Rolls the dwelling was built 1910. All matters have been cleared for ALTA Extended Policy coverage and/or Homeowners Endorsement coverage. Endorsement. KG /ga December 18, 2001 END OF SCHEDULE B 5 CONTINUED zo w w o ff ' O F- w • w F p L - 6 O .z Cu U co O z Commitment No. 8258092 -1 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, by Washington Title Company, a Washington corporation, its authorized agent, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue the policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate one hundred eighty (180) days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. 6 ,y,.v..,.cR2szl.,Ln c...L: i . il`Wd.Aar 2x j ugookwatiw CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Coin a pity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail.: tukplan @ci.tukwila.iva.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2001 -2002/ 5 -YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. CITY - WIDE Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Name: City of Tukwila/Rebecca Fox Address: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3683 FAX: 206 - 431 -3665 Signature: C Date:12 /31/01 COMPRE. PLAN ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. tu.Yitl't'm:4 V� :H <6:k1�_. >o/Silziltiti.A:Y50 7.11.I LA%'3i41.1!:47. Yti9 kt'iit6%rYA19:Ttiia6 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P-CPA/P -ZCA Planner: Rebecca Fox File Number: Application Complete (Date: /#3/ ) p / Project File Number: p0000001 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: L . D I — DV CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Coin a pity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail.: tukplan @ci.tukwila.iva.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2001 -2002/ 5 -YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. CITY - WIDE Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Name: City of Tukwila/Rebecca Fox Address: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3683 FAX: 206 - 431 -3665 Signature: C Date:12 /31/01 COMPRE. PLAN ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. tu.Yitl't'm:4 V� :H <6:k1�_. >o/Silziltiti.A:Y50 7.11.I LA%'3i41.1!:47. Yti9 kt'iit6%rYA19:Ttiia6 A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMA 18.80.050) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifices a re- designation of your property or a change in existing Plan policies: 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for it? Transportation- related issues are covered in Chapter 13, Sensitive /Critical Areas are addressed in Chapter 4 Natural Environment and updating the Comprehensive Plan is discussed in Chapter 16. Changes to the Growth Management Act and other state -wide regulations require revisiting these issues. The potential map change from LDR to C/LI is discussed in Policy 2.1.12 (Economic Development) which encourages use of industrial lands outside the MIC, and also in Policy 7/3/1 (Residential Neighborhoods) which encourages the enhancement of neighborhoods by eliminating incompatible land uses. Transit - related policies are discussed in Chapter 13, Goal 13.4 (Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare, and Personal Rapid Transit) Efficient transit capacity. 2. Why is the proposed changed the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? Comprehensive Plan changes for certain transportation issues, sensitive /critical areas and emergency update issues are the only means to incorporate recent requirements of the Growth Management Act and bring Tukwila's Plan into compliance with State regulations. A review of the C/LI and LDR zoning in the vicinity of S. 135 MacAdam and 48 Avenue South was deferred from an earlier amendment process. Transportation - related policies are needed to address the impacts of high capacity light rail development. 3. Why will the proposed changes result in a net benefit to the community? If not, what type of benefit can be expected and why? Revising the Comprehensive Plan to meet State requirements will benefit the community through consistent planning guidelines. A review of the zoning in the vicinity of S 135 and 48 Avenue will be useful in determining if a change is required. Transportation policies relating to high capacity transit will ensure that development impacts will be appropriately addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (TMC 18.80.010) In addition to the items discussed below, the City of Tukwila will continue work on other topics related to the Growth Management Act including: 1) the Shoreline Management Program; 2) design guidelines; 3) working with neighboring jurisdictions regarding the Potential Annexation Area; 4) transportation- oriented development, and 5) the Tukwila Urban Center Plan. 1. A detailed statement of what is proposed and why; The City of Tukwila will update its Comprehensive Plan to address two general types of amendments. These include: 1) changes needed in order to be consistent with certain requirements of the Growth Management Act which have been instituted since the Plan was adopted in 1995 and which have not been addressed as yet in yearly amendments; and 2) other needed changes, including a map change and two new transit- oriented policies. The focus of the amendment work will be fulfilling requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act. The City of Tukwila will also consider a map change which had been deferred from the a prior amendment cycle (Attachment A), as well as two amendments addressing development associated with and resulting from high capacity transit routing (Attachment B). 2. A statement of the anticipated impacts of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change; Plan amendments will focus on topics in the Comprehensive Plan which require revision in order to comply with recent changes to the Growth Management Act. Issues will include: 1) updating the Sensitive Areas /Critical Areas work to include Best Available Science and to provide an inventory; 2) updating certain transportation- related requirements; and 3) defining "emergency" procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan. Updating the Sensitive /Critical Areas will ensure that the Best Available Science is incorporated into the regulations and that a complete inventory of sensitive and critical areas is made. Future development projects adjacent to watercourses, wetlands and steep slopes throughout Tukwila will take this information into account. Revising transportation work to meet 2025 transportation projections is a further requirement of the GMA. This will ensure that projects throughout Tukwila are designed with the most accurate traffic information. Tukwila has clear procedures for its annual Comprehensive Plan updates, but lacks a definition of what would constitute an "emergency" for purposes of triggering an "emergency" amendment outside of the standard yearly process. In addition, a map change, suggested by the public in 2000 but deferred until 2002, will also be considered. This proposed change would evaluate Low Density Residential — LDR adjacent to Commercial /Light Industrial —C/LI near MacAdam Road/S. 135 and 48 Avenue S. Two additional policies will be added to further implement Transportation Goal 13.4 (Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare, and Personal Rapid Transit). These would pertain primarily to development in transportation corridors. 3.An explanation of why the current comprehensive plan or development regulations are deficient or should not continue in effect; The Comprehensive Plan is being updated to reflect all required revisions to the Growth Management Act. The map change is being considered since it was deferred in during an afifa rr:;'t :'ir1:M7� :.i k= rN L"=uA°y+1= 2;ai°.x earlier review with the intention of being considered in 2002. Transportation- related policies are needed to address development associated with high capacity transit. 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific requirements of the Growth zz Management Act; = H ~ w W � Transportation amendments (i.e. forecasts of traffic) will be considered to comply with RCW 36.70A.070(6)(a)(iii)(D) to address forecasts of traffic for at least ten -I 00 years based on the land use element to provide information on the location, (0 0 timing and capacity needs of future growth. J = F— U)(L. Sensitive /Critical Areas revision will be considered in order to comply with the w 0 requirements of the GMA in order to include best available science for 2 protecting critical areas (RCW 36.70A.172(1). 5 LL. a "Emergency" amendments will be defined and a procedure set out for their adoption per the = d requirement of the Comprehensive Plan Checklist: Technical Assistance Z H Tool from the Washington State Office of Community Development Growth H 0 Management Services. z t— w w The map change review and added high- capacity transit- related policies comply the Growth 0 o Management Acts Planning Goals as follows: 0 F- 1) RCW 36.70A.020 (2) Reduce Sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate w conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low- density H U development; u ~ O 2) and RCW36.70A.040. Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal iti Z transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and U coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. 0 4 5. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide Planning Policies; The proposed amendments deal with State - mandated policies. The Countywide Planning Policies will be fully reviewed in light of Buildable Lands work, housing projections and Potential Annexation Area work. 6. A statement of what changes, if ally, would be required in functional plans (i.e., the City's water, sewer, storm water or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment is adopted; At this point, it is unclear which changes, if any, would be required to functional plans. It may be necessary to revise the Transportation Improvement Plan, and/or Shoreline Management Program. z i 7. A statement of what capital improvements, if ally, would be needed to support the proposed change, and how the proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of the City; and At this point, it is unclear which capital improvements, if any, would be required to support changes to the Comprehensive Plan. 8. A statement of what other changes, if any, are required in other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the proposed change. It is anticipated that TMC 18.45 (Sensitive Areas) will require amendment. TMC 18.80 (Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan) might also require revision. It may further be necessary to make changes to Tukwila's traffic /transportation concurrency requirements. If the map change is enacted, the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps will be revised. ZONING AMENDMENT CRITERIA (TMC 18.84.030) 1. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity with the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest; Any zoning changes will be made as a direct result of changes to the Comprehensive Plan, and so shall be in conformity with this document. 2. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding areas as set forth in the application form. The map change proposed for consideration is not associated with a specific development and does not need to include a site plan. A map is included. ATTACHMENT B PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES - 12/31/01 13.4.15 Encourage transit- oriented land uses and development patterns in the vicinity of high capacity transit stations. 13.4.16 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking into residential neighborhoods or unauthorized spillover parking onto private property. z ~ • w w JU C CO ❑ u) W J = • u_ W _ ua w z � -o z► - w O . • c ❑ H WW - O W z U= O 1- z r ' j v v rrai ' I c3 cz Ilittatk m---.7f4, • / ■ A l Wi A gilt_ `R� � ✓ - Mr r Mil = 4 IOLllhjI) ym `�� Mil PEW. 1 11 . 4 4 ram NNW o in Win MN Imo n mom. MIS ,e MEI NMI WINN NM MIMI =11111111 raw Eno 1•Jam nr_aar WIMP Ri1� ; - u� 1 iaxma N..::= wI • .g .. ‘ r -s imr Ammo b.rm =1111111Z ,. am �� .111111111 s.ina:. — a ■ ■ ■ V r iii iii4. Immurililar ► fr A a llia ve ' � % /,ii.�./ • .11 am ..: a i-p 011111 Cn UMW IMO 1111{1111E1=11 11111111AI 1 MOM +"" iii ski p NU MN Nom. I sP-1111 r_a I MI.— 1U NW LIAM LD NORTH NOT TO SCALE SUBJECT PROPERTY MD ° A. f148:ST & C%. es t .1 R o al r - - -. T NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Pr posed Zone Lin f 6/30/0 NORTH Mil Holiday Parks File L99 -0094 Rezone ..DR (..ow Density R a to C /Ll (Commercial /tight Industrial) 44 - Comprehensive P an Amendment L (Low Density Residential) to C/U (Commercial/ tight ndustrial) O to �UT SOUTH 128TH v7 LU LU z _ O co A Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 Protected Areas Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. (EL 987) RM7 X • M2 97 °07 ", 32 °22'30" LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100 —YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100 -year flood by Federal flood protection system under construction; no base elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action(; no base flood elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500 -year flood; areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500 -year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS :: iA' Tt }F)+F�tlNb"C"1?C — Flood Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary Boundary Dividing Special Flood Hazard Zones. and Boundary Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line; Elevation in Feet. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet Where Uniform Within Zone. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. Elevation Reference Mark _..,,.» .:c`.'::',u;.+S:tzi:.i�t:t•.,�x ;:a,;i. ,=* '.. •Ao. "1/40 1vnM1.f.�kMaI4Y(.iRtt67 River Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based on Norm American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) Projection. NOTES This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program; it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric features outside Special .Flood Hazard Areas. Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and include the effects of wave action; these elevations may also differ significantly from those developed by the National Weather Service for hurricane evacuation planning. Areas of Soecial Flood Hazard 1100 -year flood) include Zones A, AE, AH, A0, A99, V, and VE. H PLACE STREET S 117TH STREET 19TH STREET BEET 'LACE Z w r < O NIV w z 7 _ SOUTH 118TH STREET o. 1t-- x O w 5 c = ='' a oN S 120TH STREET STREET 122 °15'00" 47 °30'00" 47 °28'07" 122 °15'00" To determine if flood insurance is available, contact an insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (600) 638 -6620. APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 f 1-1 L I NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS 11 FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL 951 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY KING COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS 530071 0957 F RENTON, CITY OF 530088 0957 F SEATTLE, CITY OF 530089 0957 F TUKWILA, CITY OF 530091 0957 F is NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX MAP NUMBER 53033C0951 F MAP REVISED: MAY 16,1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency File: L01-007 35mm Drawing #1-7 , !!;!!•!, 4 ■!:" • '; 1 / 47G 023 /754 1� /0 /3 0 -C7 oZZ5 95,s p 0 255 / $00 1ti Z :` 0 5 . 807211 3�1.9d W n 1 1 9 p - `• 335" 201) (.3 •, l • ,101 c7 4 )'- I p h b_S8 .9, z op 416.87 W U- /56./5 19.09 it i sC 0 0` 5° 12 0 45 . 1�• /69.06 C1 • O co � Q /55.2o co 0. 1 P = 0 /4J ^ ? t /54 0 J 6 ,00 o,2.5 9 ° /. z, /45.43 b 1 0 • I3IST ST n y ▪ (CWAELE5 • Q 3• fO 013.,0 9 �► �• b s• A 4 a c 0 r, 0 O o. 0 h I• I- f'- - 600 1 1 e e PC 4.. L1- i 79,1•7 8 y . 6”•27 52. 1; b 0 � o a 2b k /4.5.45 6 3 0 O \ 1,9 o �t P 0f q41,\ 0 N d• P.. /77 • / So R =. - r s 6 9.22 B o • 6� - - �• a v •tea .� • � c p C � .D 7 r, O • 6 <• R • o <` •� d_ • /4 f � /1 2. 78 • K -y55. N. 0 J16594 0040 •9 '111'1'0 P. S 0\ 0 • ' r iv e P. /v f 0 2 6 4 p = /5 7 4 77.28 44'D n o h � N 2 � V 0•v o • o lJ -Ts Jd o t/ �� • 1 i A • . P4clf /C P.o•r /795tS.Z8 P.o•T,/CL` /01- 00 [W '. ',EGA" RD•J •/ O ^ / g rb le cl` • -L STCOTT'� slnre 18,2 N1 • 0RCLo • • 0 . I .I I f 1 111 1 111 1 .11 1I III I I I I I III I inch 76.42 0 <4 TCs2 op < S • s /' / � LOT 3 II111 111 III 0 /� ti / T O `t si9 / 2j,0 / \ • 5 & � ) LtJ v /1 150. • 5 , aS la/l53 / 2'3 .Q /o. 2 0 #�� / N 89 - 7 / 20 8. • 0 0 .9 SI6 H. £I6 ZI6 614 OI6 I6 I8 IL I9 I9 IV II 111111111 IIIII1111 111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 Inllllll nnlnll 111111111 IIIIl11I1 Illlllnl IIIIIIIII S , • • O lj 0 o - c' -� o LT , Z t7� o • • 111 111111111111111111111111111111111 5 6 I I I IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII I 11111 1111 3 .. 1 1/ 4 G o • y l 0 L= ti 4 SS 8 1.- 0 v N 2 5 46 Zdo Vac.. � .L.e. s ,`13es R > 8o 8' Zo /3 53•9` ro R :00 o� / T U SP 87 o U` 3¢829 0 0 •o 0 DP • 22 /382 . • o 'D A Z7C. 1 .n/a5 - 40E //t•SZ , < ,)4270766 2 Z.,Z 71 17 14/524:11- < • SUBDIVISI • /t ccr0 4 / o a ° '4S /\ 0 • 3" a• � ' . 5 '' C/ a C< •`rA • • A r9 • „LOTS 7,8 7 J '; ,13IST ST 9, (d IAE LE S D e0%263 M 6 $0 °1 3.10 O Vj9.•e 9 •. O 2- b ' s o a 4 Z 79.17 She "eo � s�•z7 7 , 15 2.3 1 /4 . o 9.a4 5845 [] 0255 /‘ 0 47G. 0 23o TukW / R.,286-4.99 • 394••6o <fC --*-14-/B•87 • 0 • i fo 0. °R0. 1y63 l• • N 7 0 ' 3 1° p .7 !Z-{ �II h fn 1j o a r e9 '(J z I S. I34TH ST. O (FeR.v sr. ) Z 4-48.24 -.124.3.24 N. 4A/• oF5Y2 oFN /2 LOT 2 ZZ 3 • . 1, je P•T. / f oZ. 2. 2 o A 555.37 19 • h = /3 7 77.28 44'D /05 ocn ,o' l(1 %o o % o �0 /0S /0 LOT / 4.1 A e • • • N k V N 0 IP P 1' 1 0 0 / / 0 0 8 s O5, /3¢% •o_ / 5 4 Ac 8 : 76.2 54 2.9 4 4.51 • /0 /b.v•7 /�1< /otoo La- /o.G.20 4 •f. /oo�282 [w. w• [BECK ;ei,.7 RI✓ E; roN -p NroN Icr fin. e /o1' g 3L, .5 -/ .4Ir N aaII 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I.I 11 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I l. 11 . I ( 1 ,1;1... 1 :.� !.1. I..I Inch ',In 1 ) 2 W STC OTT ® . . Slnrt;87z `. P. LOT 2 111111 111 '3 .. / TU SP 87 6 . <3 0225 �O pp 0 ro Oa (p N 89- 57 -.57E 208./8 11111111111 111111111111111111111111 6 914 t I. E Z LIL OIL I I I I I Ib I I I W �I n 11111 1111 1111111111 1111.1111 111111111 1 1 11.111 1 111 111111 1111.1111 1111111111 111111111 111111111 111111111 1111 . 1 111 i7 / Sze e N N 0 LOT 3 ' � TU SP '79 -26-SS • 8004240503 F 1..3 osr O / / / mo w, Gg TR., • y /3 \ • .• h• 1 . A. •(• ,. t' \ .1 y • 0 - z / 4 0 CO& „c��9 R �s Or 'y n L OS G', q , ? 3„..gO iv. �/?S - b 4. \I' • • 4 <O . • 2 • : r /547p d • \ 0 o 7 ^v SS 8 SUBDI\ 4 ■/ a • ' c 3 p ,t op / 68 31 2 S 1.41 * 126105 0 0 0 N 0 10 icy 1° 1: :11% 111111,T- 1 I I 1 1 11 1111111HE IC/L 115111 31T111111 III' lkl 12 111111'. 1 1111111111Mft. 411"11111111 N1111 1111v MIC/L IIiI H:.amilmniummh, HO sic 11111110wer. 11111 7111 .:111111111 olinumsmon 121 AIM 71.111 00= .. mom mm= • Iwo • • • mi•mLim AMR MINN "41 111 ••• 1 r„; tii11111.: a 11 44 ' _.._ = I c ,, it 11:.11 1111 Wu HIP :1111M1 air p11111112 1111111M 1111 ST ' • IMMII MEIN MOM 2• am= - " • 771 1 ;17 . c . Iaa L.L.111•1 * If used for commercial purposes must be assembled with lot to north 180' 210' 96' ■ t ■ 16(3' 195' 128' 8 128 ST 1- 1 - 7 I.ijuiILIr ed II ill' .71MRIF 41111111111 !till I Ftsizi A n + 1111111111111 FIT St . - 11111111111111111111111 Ill 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11•1 1 1_1 J 1 " I 1,11„1,1111111111111 Inch 'o16 I 11 " I "417r- ' 5 6 1 1 VESTCOTT' Since itip4. . , 1 9 1 1 C r Z r CT 1 1 1 1 " 1 9 I 1 I I I I r II 1111 I 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 1 1111 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 I 1111 1111 1111 1111 I 1111 1111,1111 uevelopment 4r 15°1j c)1 • it • 11 1 V /5!.•56 1r O t (. 0°°C3 01 1-5 �! ! 45.43 ° 3IST ST C!(AR LE S o k. jo 3 0,! •0 9 0 00 � ' S 4 b.. 6 bA �b1 •� 0 : 8 • ! • (0 • ., IZ /3 .Z d h c h' m9 ° 10 h o I- /4J 448.87 79.27 8 04 59. Z7 151.3 A - 1 f . p y .44• , p.c t , I 951 /92.781 0 • Y ` 9 SuRYEY /4/I5- 0 •o P•P.7". . / [o f 02.22 ,51: = /5 t 77.28440 9 /7 54 0 [? •0 r• • 1 1 i 3 I 4 • /59.0(0 N 4011.° calf) 40 11 � I P) �- 7 � ti •rn of : Q o .W.al. • 13 4..T H ST.. o • gi p. . • / Y D P. o .T. /74 SS 4,7 : r •& o P.r. /6 f (09.127 ~----■5 . • 6 � 41 21 1 \19 , 1 9 ) f 4 .58 0 • V v 0 1 ' 1 1.9 r �� .. I • 4 0 1 r • 5 5.383 L 7 • 0, 095 /5? /0 4 7' 2 DZ3 /4, o. • ■ • o \t)P 46i 545 03 � 1'.c.77177151S • zlt lot [K/. K/. l3 Eck RD J .5 • LP ti\ LOT 2 V - Lt - t _ N : - t. n = N 2 = U I. 1•• • ' ••/• • 9 J, •• U 11 •• P' •', JV • V T r S 4 � . r, J • 11 I • .• J J Y lit ,, I 0 0 0 . 16 � -'- ,,,J••• ,,,r. .. _, i INJ,• M••• • r. nc:!,1 rr•I rl •• Ir, _JJ f; !„ ••,.••f b /A U 0014 • 2) ko t • 4, 24 b•.. ,r r • . °' • • r• .•rau J• !r H ST. Jr cr° - 2 25 •A r,• 004 O✓ ," . FOSTIRIA GAR ! \ `. A • I . • KING COUNTY DEPT OF. ASSESSMENTS • I ow J •.•, • t r Tolls YM 1S 1011 IN( PURPOSE Of ASS'S TIRO IN LOCATORS YOUR ►R0►t f f T ARO IS ROT O Va p,IR T C 20 To SKIR KCURA T[ *di l- [M[pi1 ►i, - •!•• • •/ N OS. -21 N • P. SE .0 -23 -4 • -1','1 NO. T4[ N NO. OAT • t v — — i 1 �- ° •••• ,• 1 v ••• 261660 NS voL U, II a' • 0/3/ EX. VACANT LOT POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT r/ f $3 V ' V F2 / - 4. it c PEDESTRIAN CROSSING apr 1s0 4.ar _ s. s' V•2 • orD rILC a• *: :1 1 7. , N? gi 1 c It J C V. .I • v t ; " C C /1 /•op O •!U O /O AJO 50 D4 ■ ,0• 0 0\... \ . n 9ao, '/ Q' � ABANDON EX. CHANNEL G, ,�''� A ., 1 '' 0dL < • r • •e• ' O i • �l•• • - ,p_ ' _IL • \ 46" ) i 150 1' =150'+ E 300 D • • ! • • ` \ =" PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSIN -\ °v v 0 c. pl• FUTURE PARK? • ALT. BRIDGE as ri! 1 4.t 1 • BIOFILTER /BACKWATER POND 0 t ALT. CROSSING • EX. PARK J � - , • , , : • -/- • • J! I/ • • t 1 (PIPE UNDER SR 599 /INTERURBAN BLVD. TO A2 /A1) .w Iv l l •4 •Ja O ,1•12 1 2 all .'J• • r, •o 'VS KCM l I i . 1 , 1 . 1 , .l .l 1 ,�1)L. 1, Inch nch I,S 11 ,) • 2 STCOTT Since 1872 u C J4,. a e I .ti G L • W N O V • /a3 a•0 I III • • It • • •r o. • I I I A t, 0 • In association with Gaynor Landscape Architects /Designers 1 • so r So ' TO DUWAMISH Z . r �J • s. � L t t . IIII1111111 1111111 1111111 11II 5 6 1. IT. Ell. . 11. U. 011 I 19 IL I 9 Ih I I Z 11. 0101 I IIII IIII IIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII ELEMENTS ON THIS PLAN ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. SEE SECTIONS FOR DETAIL.' LEGEND CITY OF T.UKWILA SOUTHGATE CREEK FISH REHABILITATION PROJECT ) C B A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ":g FISH - ENHANCED STREAM STORMWATER SWALE CULVERT STREAM CORRIDOR EASEMENT PEDESTRIAN TRAIL A B SECTION PRIVATE LAND FOR SALE PEDESTRIAN NODE W/ INTERPRETIVE SIGN IDENTIFICATION & /OR DIRECTIONAL SIGN ® EX. PARK, INCLUDING MAP OF STREAM & ASSOCIATED TRAIL EDUCATIONAL SIGN @ BRIDGE, DESCRIBING FISH SPECIES IN STREAM & FISH HABITAT BENEFITS OF CREATED BACKWATER POOL EDUCATIONAL SIGN @ OVERLOOK DECK, EXPLAINING TYPICAL POOL /RIFFLE & MEANDERS OF CREATED CHANNEL EDUCATIONAL SIGN ALONG TRAIL, DESCRIBING FISH - ENHANCED CHANNEL VS. STORMWATER SWALE EDUCATIONAL SIGN @ OVERLOOK DECK, IDENTIFYING TYPICAL STREAMSIDE VEGETATION PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN Figure 9 PROJECT ELEMENT LOC ■ • l, � � �. �� ' ' � `� o,' | .' ^ `�� ' ' v 's �/ vvoi | | | | | i | | 'JL ( | | '( � UUUUUUUUUNUU|UUUU�U | File: LO1-0076 35mm Drawing #1 -7 • Z' 6 .J U' • 00 CD 0' U) W J 2, 0 LL Q = • • 1-W; 2 Z 1-0: Z F- • 00.. !O '0 E-•. • W W, •:2 H 0, . u- O; Z UN • Z