Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L04-077 - WETZLER CHUCK - SHORT PLAT
CHUCK WETZLER SHORT PLAT 14734 59 AV S L04 -077 Mr. Chuck Wetzler 5715 S. 147 St Tukwila, WA 98168 May 13, 2005 Dear Mr. Wetzler: RE: Short Plat L04 -077 14734 59 Avenue S. Tukwila, WA 98168 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director The Short Subdivision Committee has completed review of your short plat application (No. L04- 077), and determined that it complies with all applicable City code requirements. The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. This letter serves as the Notice of Decision per TMC 18.104.170. Based on the latest project submittal eGmfn"`ary ini141 is granted subject to the conditions stated below. There are three basic steps in the short plat approval process: 1. Preliminary Approval This letter constitutes your preliminary approval. The application was reviewed by the Tukwila Short Subdivision Committee and approved with conditions. The conditions imposed are to ensure the short plat is consistent with the Criteria for Preliminary Approval listed at TMC 17.12.020 C in the Tukwila Subdivision Code. RF Page 1 of 5 2:23 PM05i 11 J05 Q:\59th Av shrt plt L04- 0771A4 -077 Prelim approvl.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Utilities PRELIMINARY APPROVAL CONDITIONS a. Revise all plans per mock -up from Public Works staff(5 /05) b. Drainage design for all lots shall meet City of Tukwila Surface Water Ordinance Requirements. Contact the Tukwila Public Works Department for submittal and design requirements. c. Pursuant to the Tukwila "underground ordinance ", all utilities shall be placed underground. d. Extension of the sewer and water lines to the lots shall be approved by the appropriate utility. As -built plans shall be provided to the Public Works Department. Access d. A 20 foot wide paved access road with an all weather surface built to Public Works and Fire Department standards must be provided to any new structures. A fire turnaround will be required if the access road exceeds 150 feet in length. Fire Protection e. There must be a fire hydrant within 250 feet of all building sites. If the fire hydrant is not capable of a 1000 gallon per minute flow the future houses will be required to provide interior sprinklers, to be approved by the Fire Department. General This requirement must be stated on the face of the recorded plat, and must be met prior to issuance of any building permits. No parking allowed on the access road. This requirement must be stated on the face of the recorded plat, and must be met prior to issuance of any building permits for Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3 or Lot 4. f. Obtain all required permits prior to beginning any construction. For water and sewer permits, contact the individual provider District. For City of Tukwila utilities, contact Tukwila Public Works at (206) 433 -0179. Short Plat L04 -077 RF Page 2 of 5 05/11/05 2:23 PM Q:\59th Av shrt pit L04- 077\1.04-077 Prelim approvl.doc g. Obtain a Public Works Type C permit to construct all required common infrastructure, including the required street light. You will need to provide a construction cost estimate, bond for work in the right of way and insurance certificate. h. Install all required site improvements, including those proposed in the short plat application and those identified above as conditions of approval. i. Submit a set of recording documents in either legal or record of survey format that meet the King County Recorder's requirements and contain the following items: 1. A survey map as described in the application checklist that is consistent with all of the conditions of approval. The surveyor's original signature must be on the face of the plat. 2. Existing and proposed legal descriptions for all lots. 3. Legal description of the access/utility easement. 4. Joint Maintenance Agreement required for easements and utilities. APPEALS This short plat approval decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative appeal of the decision on the short plat, excluding challenges to the DNS, is permitted. If no valid appeals are filed within the time limit the decision of the Department will be final. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision (6/3/2005). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Short Plat L04 -077 RF Page 3 of 5 05/11/05 2:23 PM Q:159th Av shrt plt L04 -077\L04 -077 Prelim approvl.doc 2. Final Approval Expiration 3. Recording Any appeal shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. The next step is to install the required site improvements, comply with the conditions of approval and submit the necessary short plat documents (survey, legal descriptions, and other required paper work). You may apply to delay installation of the site improvements up to six months beyond final approval subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. A financial guarantee must be provided to ensure installation. All taxes and fees assessed against the property must be current prior to final approval. Please check with the King County Assessor's Office and the City of Tukwila Finance Department prior to submitting final mylars. After the documents have been found to be in order, and the all of the requirements of the short plat have been met, the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee signs your short plat which constitutes a grant of final approval. j. The final approved short plat must be filed with the King County Department of Records by, May 13, 2006, one year from the date of this preliminary approval or the application will expire. The City may grant a single one year extension if requested in writing prior to the expiration date. The signature of the Chairman of the Short Subdivision Committee certifies that your short plat application is ready for recording. It is your responsibility to record the City approved short plat documents with the King County Department of Records. You will need to pay the recording fees and submit your approved original short plat to King County, see the Recording Procedures handout. The short plat is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. After recording, the County returns the recorded original to the City of Tukwila within 4 -6 weeks, at which time your short plat is considered complete. You can shorten this processing time by hand - delivering a copy of the recorded short plat to the project planner. Short Plat L04-077 RF Page 4 of 5 05/11/05 2:23 PM Q:159th Av shrt pit L04- 077\L04-077 Prelim approvl.doc In many circumstances, building permits on the short platted property may not be issued until a copy of the recorded short plat (or original) is returned to the Department of Community Development. Sincerely, Enclosure LAS Steve Lancaster Chair, Short Subdivision Committee cc: Jim Morrow, Public Wo Director (please initial your approval) Nick Olivas, Fire Chief (p a initial your approval) Chuck Wetzler, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Short Plat L04 -077 RF Page 5 of 5 05/11/05 2:23 PM Q:\59th Av shrt plt L04 -077\1,04 -077 Prelim approvl.doc MEMORANDUM To: Jim Morrow via Joanna Spencer Nick Olivas via Don Tomaso Richard Takechi From: Rebecca Fox .(1) RE: Wetzler Short Plat (Final Approval) Date: July 6, 2006 File: L04 -077 RECETVZin JUL 0 7 2005 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS The above - referenced short plat is ready for final approval. Attached are the documents for recording. Please indicate your approval by putting your initials next to your name below. If you do not approve, indicate any additional requirements below. Please pass the document to the next person on the list, with the last person forwarding the materials back to Rebecca. Thanks. Approved by Nick Olivas ‘a• '( (initials) Approved by Jim Morrow (initials) Approved by Richard Takechi fz5T l (initials) RI- :59th A% ,hr[ plt 1.111 -077 Finalcirculatc.dre 07 06. 200o CHUCK WE 1 LLER DIANNA DEVLIN PO BOX 68148 a SEATTLE, WA 98168 PH: 206- 755 -8624 OR 206 -920 -6258 FAx: 206- 686 -2542 EMAIL: DIANDPELE @AOL.COM July 5, 2006 Rebecca Fox, Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Revisions of Short-Plat 04 -077 Address: 14734 59 Avenue South, Tukwila Per your direction, please find the required changes per Public Works regarding our final short plat. Please find enclosed: • Notarized/revised drawing • Notarized/revised easement agreements Chuck Wetzler will be out of town for the next week, so I will be following up with you and your team to be sure we have met all of the requirements. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, 1 Dianna Devlin Cc: Rehabitat Northwest Suite #C100 -444 • 126 SW 148 Street • Seattle. Washington 98166 • Ph: 206 - 686 -2543 • Toll Free: 1- 877 - 214 -4086 • Fx: 206 -686 -2542 Email: diandpele @aol.com or srs2725 aol.ccm C JVE JUL07 2000 PUBLIC WORK Crri Or TUK'r ILA .I r PERMIT CE;:r;:z.li To: From: Subject: Date: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Chuck Wetzler Rebecca Fox, Tukwila Department of Community Development Tukwila Public Works comments re Final Plat June 26, 2006 We have received several comments on your final short plat submittal. These comments must be addressed before the final short plat can be approved by the City of Tukwila and recorded with King County. Public Works - -As we discussed by phone, Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer raised several items that must be addressed before the Public Works Department can approve a final short plat document. Joanna's annotated materials are provided for your use. Joanna's comments are the following: 1) There is a 10 foot wide sewer and storm drainage easement on the south side of the property. It needs to have the legal description shown on the face of the plat. A separate easement and maintenance agreement is also needed. Samples are attached. 2) Re the Declaration of easement and maintenance agreement signed by Chuck Wetzler on 5/10/6: Items #4 and #7 need to have the width revised to include the Fire Access/Hammerhead easement. If you have questions on these comments, please contact Joanna directly via e-mail at Jspencer @,ci.tukwila.wa.us Finance - -The Finance Department has indicated that there are unpaid bills for both water and storm drainage. These must be paid before the final plat can be approved. Please contact Richard Takechi directly at 206 - 433 -1870. Fire Department - -I am waiting for comments from the Tukwila Fire Department, and will let you know when I have received them. Rf 1 06/26/2006 O: \59th Av shrt nit L04- 077\Wetzlertinalcomments.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Consumption Comparison This Period Same period last year I Change Consumption 0 0 0 City of Tukwila Remit To : PO Box 58424 Tukwila, WA 98138 -1424 (206) 433 -1849 Return this stub with your payment 05- 0050 -0000 Location 14734 59TH AVE S WETZLER CHUCK & DEVLIN DIANNA PO BOX 68148 TUKWILA, WA 98168 -0148 Please detach and return top portion with your remittance. Meter # PLEASE REMEMBER WHILE CELEBRATING AMERICA THIS FOURTH OF JULY TO BE SAFE WHILE USING ANY FIREWORKS. HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY Dater and /or Sewer ng at Billing Date r11 Diu 11 11 IIPI 05/31/2006 Previous Balance 06/14/2006 Billing Account #: 05- 0050 -0000 Service Location: 14734 59TH AVE S Penalty - Late Fee 06/15/2006 Billing Hang Tag Fee - Door Hanger Fee 06/26/2006. Billing Turn Service On Fee - Turn Service On Fee 06/26/2006 Payment/Credit Applied - Thank You ill/ Customer 1 WETZLER CHUCK & DEVLIN DIANNA Prev Date Prev Read 1 Prev Read 2 Curr Date 0 0 Address I PO BOX 68148 TUKWILA, WA 98168 -0148 06/30/2006 111 111 Upon Receipt ui4 111 Curr Read 1 Curr Read 2 0 0 Remit To City cf Tukwila PO Box 58424. Tukwila. WA 53138 -1424 - PH: (206) 433 -18 5.00 10.00 25.00 Amount Due 0.00 Amount Enclosed Check here and complete ❑ back of stub for changes Account # 05- 0050 -0000 1 Billing Date Due Date I Prev Balance 06/30/2006 Upon Receipt 136.70 Payments 176.70 Cur Activity 1 Amount Due I 40.00 0.00 Date I Service Fee Credit Balance 0.00 I Amount 1 Due Date: Upon Receipt Amount Due: 0.001 Totals Cons RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2OO6 TUAWiLt PUBLIC WORKS 136.70 5.00 10.00 25.00 176.70 CR SIGNED AND DATED this 3O day of :furl e. 2006 Charles L. Wetzler by Charles `1✓. Wet/zler v STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me 6/1242 L. Or trier to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledges that _he signed the same ash;S free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and further stated that _he was authorized to execute the within and foregoing Declaration of Easement on behalf of said corporation. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day orfailL Zs O A. N j4 ./ •� • : Op 71 WAS 1 Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- ington, residing at iak&, ice- . My appointment expires: 1011/ 10i Printed name: eig it. All uci ler 4 When recorded return to: PRIVATE SANITARY AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT Grantor: Charles L. Wetzler Grantee: Charles L. Wetzler Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Tract 5, Interurban Addition to Seattle, Vol. 10, page 55, of Plats Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released: N/A The parties to this Agreement are the owners of Lots 1 -4, Tukwila Short Plat No. L04 -077, filed on the day of , 2006, under King County Auditor's File No. , and legally described as follows: That portion of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, WA described as follows: Beginning on the East line of 59 Avenue South at a point 20 feet South of the intersection of said East line with the adjudicated line between Tracts 4 and 5 of the aforesaid addition, thence south along the East line of 59 Avenue South 150 feet; thence east 200 feet on a line parallel with said adjudicated line; thence north 150 feet on a line parallel with the east line of 59 Avenue South; thence west 200 feet on a line parallel with and 20 feet south of the aforesaid adjudicated line to the point of beginning 1. For valuable consideration received, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby conveys, creates, declares and imposes an easement for storm and sanitary sewer ten (10) feet in width, over, along , across and under the following described real property: The south 10 feet of the following described parcel: That portion of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning on the east line of 59 Avenue South at a point 20 feet south of the intersection of said east line with the adjudicated line between Tracts 4 and 5 of the aforesaid addition; thence along the east line of 59 Avenue South 150 feet; thence east 200 feet on a line parallel with said adjudicated line; thence north 150 feet on a line parallel with the east line of 59 Avenue South; thence west 200 feet on a line parallel with and 20 feet south of the aforesaid adjudicated line to the point of beginning. 2. This easement is for the sole purpose of the construction, use, and maintenance of a storm and sanitary sewer line, together with the right of ingress and egress for said construction, use, and maintenance. 3. Grantee shall install said sewer line- its sole cost and expense and shall continue to maintain and shall continue to bear all cost of repair and maintenance or repair of said sewer line. 4. Grantee shall hold Grantor harmless from and against any and all claims which may be made against Grantor arising out of the installation, operation, maintenance or repair of said sewer line. 5. The parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns further agree that all costs of maintenance and repair occasioned by normal wear and tear of the sewer easement shall be borne in equal shares by the parcels served thereby, except that each party hereto shall indemnify and hold the others harmless from all damage caused solely by that party. The terms and conditions of this and subsequent paragraphs concerning the use and maintenance of this easement shall not be construed as personal but shall run with the land for the benefit, burden or all successors, transferees or assigns on either side of this agreement. 6. Any party desiring to have maintenance and/or repair work done on the storm or sanitary sewer shall obtain a minimum of 2 bids for the work, and shall notify the other owners in the plat in writing via certified mail of the time and place of a meeting to consider and vote upon the proposal. A vote of 3 of the 4 lot owners shall be required to approve the proposed maintenance or repair. If a lot is owned by more than one person, the approval of all owners of said lot shall be required to constitute an approval for that lot. The sewer line shall at all times be maintained adequately to provide the necessary utility service. 7. If said repair or maintenance proposal is approved, then each owner shall be assessed a one fourth share of the total bill for the work. If after 30 days after written demand any owner's assessment remains due and unpaid, then each owner hereby consents to and grants the other owners the right to place a lien and foreclose said lien, pursuant to RCW 60.04, against the nonpaying owner's lot for the outstanding balance, together with the costs of preparation and recording of said lien, including reasonable attorneys fees. 8. This easements shall be non - exclusive and perpetual and shall run with the land and benefit the heirs, successors , transferees and assigns of the owners of Lots 1 -4, Tukwila Short Plat No. L04 -077, described above. These easements shall not be construed as personal. This agreement may be amended only with the written agreement of the Grantees herein. SIGNED AND DATED this t day of U (le 2006 Charles L. Wetzler STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) i ,' D 1 L On this day personally appeared before me el/Ur/ZS L . 1 Zl e to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledges that _he signed the same as 65 free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein Mentioned,-and further stated that _he was authorized to execute the within and foregoing Declaration of Easement on behalf of said corporation. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day oftnt ir-, NOT ,o� - G� '/ -A: . o ff ' e y;In �n =.1 &Lic IVA SHtNa',, s A .h.gy - c., ! wzj `- Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- ington, residing at i.akiA9 1 !a_ . My appointment expires: JO / 11 / .E; Printed name: �� . c)°,. 4 When recorded return to: DECLARATION OF EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Grantor: Charles L. Wetzler Grantee: Charles L. Wetzler Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Tract 5, Interurban Addition to Seattle, Vol. 10, page 55, of Plats Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released: N/A The parties to this Agreement are the owners of Lots 1 -4, Tukwila Short Plat No. L04 -077, filed on the day of 2006, under King County Auditor's File No. , and legally described as follows: That portion of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, WA described as follows: Beginning on the East line of 59 Avenue South at a point 20 feet South of the intersection of said East line with the adjudicated line between Tracts 4 and 5 of the aforesaid addition, thence south along the East line of 59 Avenue South 150 feet; thence east 200 feet on a line parallel with said adjudicated line; thence north 150 feet on a line parallel with the east line of 59 Avenue South; thence west 200 feet on a line parallel with and 20 feet south of the aforesaid adjudi- cated line to the point of beginning 1 1. For valuable consideration received, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby conveys, creates, declares and imposes an easement for ingress, egress, and utilities twenty (20) feet in width, over, along , across and under the following described real property: That portion of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, WA described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of 59 Avenue South and the adjudicated line between Tracts 4 and 5 of said plat; thence south 01 °08'07" west, along said East line 70 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 89 °01'02" east, parallel with said adjudicated line, 135.33 feet; thence south, 01 °08'07" west, parallel with 59 Avenue South, 20 feet; thence north 89 °01'02" west, parallel with said adjudicated line, 135.33 feet to the east line of 59 Avenue South; thence north 01 °08'07" east, along said east line, 20 feet to the true point of beginning 2. In addition to the ingress and egress easement described above, Grantor hereby creates, conveys, declares, and imposes an easement for fire and emergency vehicle access only twenty (20) feet in width, over, along, and across the following described real property: That portion of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, WA described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of 59 Avenue South and the adjudicated line between Tracts 4 and 5 of said plat; thence south 01 °08'07" west, along said East line 70 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 89 °01'02" east, parallel with said adjudicated line, 135.33 feet; thence south, 01 °08'07" west, parallel with 59 Avenue South, 20 feet; thence north 89 °01'02" west, parallel with said adjudicated line, 20.39 feet to point of curvature; thence on a curve to the left with a radius of 20 feet, an arc of 31.36 feet; thence south 1 °08'07" west, parallel with 59 Avenue South, 50.05 feet; thence north 89 °01'02" west, parallel with said adjudicated line, 20.00 feet; thence north 1 °08'07" east, parallel with 59 Avenue South, 49.95 feet to a point of curvature; thence on a curve to the left with a radius of 20.00 feet, an arc of 31.47 feet; thence north 89 °01'02" west, parallel with said adjudicated line, 54.95 feet to the east line of 59 Avenue South; thence north 1 °08'07" east, along said east line 20.00 feet to the true point of beginning 3. These easements shall be non - exclusive and perpetual and shall run with the land and benefit the heirs, successors, transferees and assigns of the owners of Lots 1 -4, Tukwila Short Plat No. L04 -077, described above. These easements shall not be construed as personal. 4. The parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns further agree that all costs of maintenance and repair occasioned by normal wear and tear of the traveled portion of the ingress and egress easement shall be borne in equal shares by the parcels served thereby, except that each party hereto shall indemnify and hold the others harmless from all damage caused solely by that party. The terms and conditions of this and subsequent paragraphs concerning the use and maintenance of this easement shall not be construed as personal but shall run with the land for the benefit, burden or all successors, transferees or assigns on either side of this agreement. 5. The easement roadway described herein shall be composed of asphalt paved to a minimum width of 20 feet. There shall be no parking on the asphalt surface of the easement. Trash and recycling containers shall not be placed upon the roadway. 6. Any party desiring to have maintenance and/or repair work done on the roadway shall obtain a minimum of 2 bids for the work, and shall notify the other owners in the plat in writing via certified mail of the time and place of a meeting to consider and vote upon the proposal. A vote of 3 of the 4 lot owners shall be required to approve the proposed maintenance or repair. If a lot is owned by more than one person, the approval of all owners of said lot shall be required to constitute an approval for that lot. 7. If said repair or maintenance proposal is approved, then each owner shall be assessed a one fourth share of the total bill for the work. If after 30 days after written demand any owner's assessment remains due and unpaid, then each owner hereby consents to and grants the other owners the right to place a lien and foreclose said lien, pursuant to RCW 60.04, against the nonpaying owner's lot for the outstanding balance, together with the costs of preparation and recording of said lien, including reasonable attorneys fees. 8. The parties hereto, their heirs successors, and assigns each hereby covenant and agree not to fence, build, construct, locate, or place any structure upon the fire department access corridor located upon the east 10 feet of Lot 1 and the west 10 feet of Lot 2 of the above named Plat, as described in Paragraph 2 herein. 3 Rebecca Fox - Short Plat #L04 -07,, From: Rebecca Fox To: Wetzler, Charles L Date: 6/22/06 11:38AM Subject: Short Plat #L04 -077 Hello Mr. Wetzler, forwarded your maps to departments for final review and approval on 6/12. I'm still waiting to get these back. (I'll try to expedite.) Once I receive the signed copy, I will notify you, and you can pick up your materials from us for recording with King County. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 -431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> " Wetzler, Charles L" <charles.l.wetzler @boeing.com> 06/22/06 10:29AM Hi Rebecca, 1 was wondering if you could update me with the status of the Wetzler short plat. Last I heard from you was that it should be completed (signatures) sometime this week. I appreciate your help. Chuck Wetzler »> Page 1 To: MEMORANDUM Jim Morrow via Joanna Spencer Nick Olivas via Don Tomaso Richard Takechi From: Rebecca Fox RE: Wetzler Short Plat (Final Approval) Date: June 12, 2006 File: L04 -077 The above - referenced short plat is ready for final approval. Attached are the documents for recording. Please indicate your approval by putting your initials next to your name below. If you do not approve, indicate any additional requirements below. Please pass the document to the next person on the list, with the last person forwarding the materials back to Rebecca. Thanks. Approved by Nick Olivas (initials) Approved by Jim Morrow (initials) Approved by Richard Takechi (initials) RF 1 06/22/2006 Q:\59th Av shrt plt L04- 077\Finalcirculate.doc To: File From: Rebecca Fox Subj: Extension for Short Plat L04 -077 Date: May 11, 2006 Chuck Wetzler's one -year preliminary short plat approval "anniversary" is on May 13, 2006. He has requested an extension for a four lot short plat #L04-077 located at 14734 59 Avenue South. We will extend the deadline for completing all the work required for the preliminary approval until January 13, 2007. Rf 1 5/11/06 Q:\59th Av shrt p1t L04- 077\Project Extension 5 - 11- 06.doc Rebecca Fox - Extension for Short P' Page 1 From: Rebecca Fox To: Wetzler, Charles L Date: 5/11/06 1:51 PM Subject: Extension for Short Plat Mr. Wetzler, We received your request for a time extension for your short plat, and are granting you an 8 -month extension until 1/13/07 to complete all the requirements of the preliminary approval. Per your letter, we anticipate that the project will be final in approximately mid -June, 2006. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 -431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwi la.wa. us 05/11/2006 06:27 2066862542 DB MANAGEMENT LLC CHUCK WETZLER DIANNA DEVLIN PO BOX 68148 • SEATTLE, WA 98168 PH: 206 - 7558624 OR 206 - 9206258 Fax: 206-686-2542 Telefax Message to Rebecca Fox 206- 431 -3665 May 10, 2006 Rebecca Fox, Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Extension of Short-Plat 04 -077 Address: 14734 59 Avenue South, Tukwila Per your instructions, we are requesting an extension for the above short-plat application. We are in the final stages of this short -plat, and we need additional time to finish up the final inspections. We are working closely with Rehabitat Northwest, and our engineer to get the public works portion finalized. We plan to finalize this project in no more than a month. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Cc: Rehabitat Northwest Suite #C100-444 .126 SW 148 Street • Seattle, Washington 88166 • Ph: 206 - 688 -2543 • ToJI Free: 1- 877- 214 -4086 • Fx 206-686 -2542 Email: diandpeleCpaol.com or sre2728Qaol.com PAGE 01/01 Rebecca Fox - Wetzler Short Plat Status. Page 1 From: Rebecca Fox To: Wetzler, Charles L Date: 4/27/06 10:28AM Subject: Wetzler Short Plat Status. Mr. Wetzler, Regarding your question about the status of your short plat, all infrastructure must completed before the short plat can be considered "final" and it can be recorded with the King County Assessor's Office. Per the requirements of your preliminary approval, issued on 5/13/05, you must file the final approved short plat by 5/13/06 i.e. two weeks from now. The City may grant a single one -year extension if you request this in writing prior to the expiration date. Joanna Spencer of the Public Works Department indicated that the construction permit PW05 -089 for the infrastructure has been issued. She met 4/26/06 with the contractor and clarified what needs to be shown on the "as- built" infrastructure plan. She also asked the contractor Turnover documents documents for the public infrastructure that are being installed as part of the Public Works permit will also be needed. Joanna does not know how much of the construction has actually been completed at this point. I hope this gives you the information you need. In order to extend the deadline for filing the short plat, pls send me a written request before the 5/13/06 deadline. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 -431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us L Rebecca Fox - Re: Fwd: Wetzler short plat Page 1 From: Joanna Spencer To: Rebecca Fox Date: 4/27/06 9:51 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Wetzler short plat Hello Rebecca, PW05 -089 is still an active permit. Yesterday 1 met with the contractor and clarified what needs to be shown on the "as- built' infrastructure plan. I also inquired about status of the street Tight and fire hydrant. They will also need to do turnover documents for public infrastrucure installed as part of this PW permit. » »Joanna »> Rebecca Fox 04/27/06 09:34AM »> Hi Joanna, Mr. Wetzler wanted to know the status of his work. I checked the Permits Plus file and the most recent entries were from you re PW05 -089 for the infrastructure. So, I think this question is for you. Do you want to contact Mr. Wetzler directly? Pls advise. Rebecca February 17, 2006 Chad Detwiller 5639 16 Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98106 SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #1 to Revision #1 Public Works Permit Application Number PW05 -089 Wetzler Short Plat Dear Mr. Detwiller: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your permit can be approved. Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer with Public Works, has reviewed your application and has attached comments and /or corrections. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your review does not require revised plans, but requires additional reports or other documentation, please submit four (4) copies of each document. In order to expedite your application, a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the City of Tukwila Public Works Department at (206) 433 -7184. Sincerely, Laurie Werle Permit Technician enclosures Mr. Chuck Wetzler 5715 S. 147 St Tukwila, WA 98168 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Short Plat L04 -077 14734 59 Avenue S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Dear Mr. Wetzler: The Tukwila Public Works Department has completed its review of the revised site improvement plan prepared by Bruce MacVeigh that you submitted on May 31, 2005. Staff has found the materials to be satisfactory. The next step will be to apply for a Tukwila Public Works Type C permit to construct all required infrastructure. A permit application is enclosed for your use. Sincerely, ebecca Fox Senior Planner Enclosure RF Page 1 of l 08/23/05 12:17 PM Q:159th Av shrt plt L04- 0771Permit Type C letter 8 -05.doc Steven M Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Dear Ms. Fox: City of Tukwila Attn: Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Bruce S. MacVeigh, R.E. / 4 0 Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical co ` '705 14245 59 Ave. S. OEvE�� Tukwila, WA 98168 MENt Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same Subject: Geotechnical Report Requirement, Wetzler 4 -Lot Short Plat, Tukwila Short Plat, 14734 59th Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 (L04 -077, Chuck Wetzler) Attached is a scaled topographic map showing the steeper existing slope areas of the above site. A requirement for a full Geotechnical Report was noted in the City letter dated January 24, 2005. It is requested that this requirement be removed. The "steep slopes" areas are part of an existing lawned yard and are very small in area. The slopes in the 15- 25% zone are only 1,209 SF (equivalent to a square 35 feet on a side) and the steeper slopes in the 25-40% zone are only 241 SF (equivalent to a square 16 feet on a side). The maximum measured slope is only 33 %, in one tiny area. The site is 30,000 SF, so that the zones comprise only five percent of the site. Most of these areas will be removed during the construction of the new private road for the site. None are in a location, which even if they did continue to exist, would affect the geotechnical safety of any areas on or off site. In addition, the typical difference in elevation, that is height of slope, of these zones is only 2 to 4 feet. Questions relating to this matter may be made directly to this office Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer March 22, 2005 WETZLER02.doc 0452 1 C/L —0 / W R/W N• 0 00 /Z "ST \ —mac — oth I � • S5'2' A VE .S. aft 1, Ca NC. WA I ' A/ OP 40' 67" .E /60.04 IQ I � 1 F9'D /'DZ "E Z1' 7 u ' 23 1 50.33' 5 50 5E 7 X 89 D /'DZ "W /5-- 2 5 4.7 SF /8 s s." ss" s,' Z5--- 4 7o /.30 s,c• /// sf 24/ sd ad' / 96 SZ. 74, ' ,/, - , Z oz. Zo 198 '/2/ A7?0M Z 4 City of Tukwila Attn: Ryan Larson, P.E. 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Larson: Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same March 22, 2005 Subject: Drainage Requirements, Wetzler 4 -Lot Short Plat, Tukwila Short Plat, 14734 59th Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 (L04 -077, Chuck Wetzler) We hope this note assists you in the drainage review for the above. It refers to comments in the City letter dated January 24, 2005. 1. As noted, the site is not in an infiltration restricted zone. As such, the use of infiltration is appropriate. 2. The site was given a full drainage review, including a full TIR. The TIR included the One - Quarter Mile Downstream evaluation, even though the only flows off site will be as overflow of the infiltration system. (Please check your files. If you need new copies, please let us know.) 3. The overflow will now be connected to the street system via a new Type 1 catch basin, per your recommendation. Questions relating to this matter may be made directly to this office Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer RECEIVED MAR 2.3 2005 DEVELOPMENT WETZLER02.doc 04523 L oar- o-1? Chuck Wetzler P.O. Box 68148 Tukwila, WA 98168 Sincerely, - 6; <. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Cc Joanna Spencer Enc. 1 Ss 962-v CeAl City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director March 16, 2005 RE: Proposed Short Plat —L04 -077 - Request for street Light waiver Dear Mr. Wetzler: The Tukwila Public Works Department has reviewed your request for a waiver from the requirement for a new street light, and has determined that the new street light on the east side of 59 Avenue South is necessary. The requirement to install new streetlights went into effect after amendments in 2002 to Tukwila Municipal Code Title 11, Right-of-Way Use. Short Plats are currently required to provide streetlights, as the enclosed shows. If you have questions about this requirement, please contact either me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via e-mail at rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us, or Joanna Spencer at 206 - 431 -2440 or jspencer @ci.tukwila.wa.us . 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 / ff-0 11 7r��� ll 4) ,,, 1 wet- mum cfmi 6,0 0 e l section of street pavement aria surface water drainage facilities along the frontage of the development site abutting the unpaved street surface; 3. If the development site is contiguous to a parcel that is served by paved street surface, the devel- oper shall construct half - street section of street pave- ment and surface water drainage facilities along the frontage of the development site abutting the existing paved street surface; 4. Surface water drainage facilities in all cases, whether the development site fronts a paved street surface or an unpaved street surface; and 5. If the development site fronts a paved street surface, minor edge improvements to the street pavement, as required by the Director, shall be constructed. (Ord. 1995 §1(part), 2002) 11.12.090 Inspections All such public improvements shall be constructed under the supervision of the Director in accordance with City standards. No final installation shall be done until the City has inspected and approved the installation and forms, and has certified they are according to proper profile and location. (Ord. 1995 §1(part), 2002) standards adopted by either the National Arborists Association or the International Society of Arboricul- ture. The property owner is responsible for ensuring that landscaping fronting his /her property does not impair sight- distance. Topping of street trees is prohib- ited. (Ord. 1995 §1(part), 2002) 11.12.110 Street Lighting A. Street lighting is required along all public streets, including new public streets in subdivisions and short subdivisions. The developer is responsible for design and installation of new lighting and relocation of existing lighting along the street frontage of the development. B. All street light installations, including wiring, conduit and power connections, shall be located or relocated underground, except in residential areas with existing aboveground utilities. C. For new subdivisions, the City will accept maintenance and power cost responsibility for the public street light system when a subdivision is 50% or more occupied. Until then, the property owner shall remain responsible for the maintenance of and energy charges for the street lighting system. D. Street illumination is required at the intersection of a private street and a public street. No street lighting is required along a private street. (Ord. 1995 §1(part), 2002) 11.12.120 Private Streets Private streets will be allowed when: 1. A covenant that provides for maintenance and repair of the private street by property owners has been approved by the City and recorded with King County; 2. The covenant includes a condition that the private street will remain open at all times for emergency and public service vehicles; and 3. The private street would not hinder public street circulation; and 4. At least one of the following conditions exists: a. The street would ultimately serve four or fewer lots; or b. The private street would be part of a TITLE 11 — RIGHT OF WAY USE 11.12.150 Nonmotorized Facilities A. The City's goals and policies for nonmotorized facilities are described in the pedestrian and bicycle transportation plan. The users of nonmotorized facili- ties are separated in that plan into two categories: pedestrians (which includes people, wheelchairs, horses, and other nonmotorized users) and bicycles. Internal pedestrian circulation systems shall be provided within and between existing, new and redeveloping commercial, multifamily and single - family developments; activity centers; and existing frontage pedestrian systems. B. Concrete sidewalks shall be provided: 1. On both sides of all arterial streets. 2. On both sides of all non - arterial streets longer than 200 feet and on one side of all non - arterial less than 200 feet in length. 3. On both sides of all public streets which provide access to existing or planned future sidewalks, activity centers, parks, schools, neighborhoods, or public transit facilities. 1 Rebecca Fox - Wetzer Short Plat @ 14759th Ave S in Tukwila L04 -077 From: Joanna Spencer To: James.kennedy @pse.com Date: 3/15/05 12:01 PM Subject: Wetzer Short Plat @ 14734 59th Ave S in Tukwila L04 - 077 On Feb 16, 2005 I have faxed you an inquiry about a street Tight required on the east side of 59th Ave S @ the intersection of future short plat access road and 59th Ave S. As of today we have not heard back from you. PW needs to know if power is available and what is the approximate cost to install one Town & Country street light on the east side of 59th Ave S. Thanks for your cooperation Joanna Spencer Development Engineer Tukwila Public Works (206) 431 -2440 jspencer @ci.tukwila.wa.us Page 1 Rebecca Fox - Re: Wetzler Short plat " 1 734 59th ave S Page 1 \f From: Rebecca Fox To: Wetzler, Charles L Date: 3/8/05 1:23PM Subject: Re: Wetzler Short plat 14734 59th ave S Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 -431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us Mr. Wetzler, I've forwarded your e-mail to Joanna Spencer (street light) and Mike Cusick (fire hydrant) for their response /information. »> " Wetzler, Charles L" <charles.l.wetzler©boeing.com> 03/08/05 12:50PM »> Hi Rebecca, I was wondering if you'd heard anything in response to the letter I wrote about the streetlight requirement. Also, one of the other items on our list to take care of was to show where the nearest fire hydrant was located. Last week I was contacted by Mike S. in public works who asked for an easement so they could install a new fire hydrant on our property because the old one across the street had broken. The new location is staked. Thanks Chuck f To whom it may concern, In regards to the street lighting requirements as noted in the comments for proposed short plat — L04 -077. I respectfully request that the requirement for a new street light on the east side of 59 Ave South at the intersection of the proposed new private road be waived due to the following: 1) Currently all the existing streetlights on 59 Ave S are on the west side of the street. 2) An existing streetlight is near where the new intersection will be. (See photo attached) 3) Consistent with other short plats within the city where new streetlights were not required if an existing one was near the new intersection. Sincerely, Chuck Wetzler One s� © q i 9.60 f ,g 9 62-/&/ 56 4 $ _03 7I iC Lp U i0.s ,rte / ;242_ /Ire N1004.1,-,2._ _06/0; RECEIVED FIB 1 0 2005 • COMMUN,rY DEVELOPMENT • February 8, 2005 RECEIVED FEB 1 0 2005 PUBLIC WORKS , w pR5- W7LL 61 IIPP/2))(_ /V' /uO2 TI-! D � 04-1 6 C 7 771 S rs i& D/Lr-1/6 y . s5 /you) • 6143- - rrn e) J 3 rsNG- sr/ea L2-c-1 r gVLSN �c2S��e Ta 111- Pew P co a I- Pi 0 F'm 0 m ,4 11.1 Ca J DAtAvta ( b-rov /If t ri . k Of) (ito z LL o t"P,7 i LIDJi -e art k_6 4 / c ti /fog-f(--/- 777z,4.0./s .21/v 5 RECEPirn FED i i iisit3 PUBLIC WQHKS Rebecca Fox - Short plat: Utilities rev Id before sale of new lots Page 1 From: Rebecca Fox To: ChasLou @cheerful.com Date: 2/1/05 1:52PM Subject: Short plat: Utilities required before sale of new lots Mr. Wetzler, Per our discussion yesterday, I wanted to confim with you that the City of Tukwila requires utitilities to be installed prior to the sale of new lots. Please contact me if you have further questions. (Please reply to this email so I know that you've received it.) Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 -431 -3665 (fax) rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us CC: Joanna Spencer Chuck Wetzler P.O. Box 68148 Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: Proposed Short Plat -- L04 -077 Dear Mr. Wetzler: City staff has completed a detailed review of your Short Plat application, and have provided comments. Please contact Joanna Spencer of the Tukwila Department of Public Works at 206 -431 -2440 if you have questions about the following comments: GEOTECHNICAL Part of the property contains Class 2 slopes, therefore, the Building Department and Public Works will require a geotechnical report that meets Bulletin B4. The report should be prepared by a geotechnical engineer as defined in TMC 16.54 and TMC 18.06 both recently updated and adopted by council, and the King County Surface Water Design Manual. A Sensitive Area Covenant and Hold Harmless Agreement shall be executed and recorded. The geotechnical report will be sent for a peer review paid for by the applicant. Please provide $2000 to cover the initial review with your geotechnical report. Please contact Joanna Spencer of the Tukwila Public Works Department if you have questions concerning this requirement. ' SURFACE WATER I V utr ased on ' ' : KC Su ace Water Design Manual flow chart for determining type . rainage review required, your proposal shall be subject to a full draina e review and not small drainage review. The City does not allow throug curb outlets. Pipe shall be connected to the existing storm drainage system in the street and a new catch basin shall be installed. ave your civi engineer set up an appointment with Ryan Larson, PW Senior Water Engineer, at (206) 431 -2456 to discuss surface water design issues. ice. 41.1 l City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director e infiltration is not allowed ou January 24, 2005 STREET LIGHTING A streetlight is required on the east side of 58 Avenue South at the intersection of the private road and a public street as defined in TMC 11.12.110. The streetlight shall match Steven M Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 the existing system (Town & Country type concrete pole). Applicant shall contact Puget Sound Energy for street light location and coordination. SANITARY SEWER Since the length of the proposed sanitary sewer along the south property line exceeds 150 feet, it falls under the private sewer main extension category; therefore a manhole shall be installed 150 feet east from the existing sewer main. The new sewer tap shall be a cut in with romac sleeve and coupling. WATER Show location of the nearest fire hydrant and distance to the property corner on the drawings. The fire hydrant shall be within 250' of future structures or future structures shall have fire sprinlders installed. Please provide this information to us at your earliest convenience so that we can continue reviewing your application for a short plat. Please contact me at 206 -431 -3683 if you need to speak with me. In addition, we will need the following information prior to approval of the final plat. It is all right to wait until the final plat to furnish this information: 1. The survey needs a vicinity map showing the site's location. 2. Bearings and distances for all newly created lots shall be shown on the survey, together with the true point of beginning. 3. The sewer easement shall be shown along the south side of the property. 4. Separate easements and maintenance agreements shall be required. Sincerely, A ‘eco-- 7 vic' Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enclosures: Bulletin B4 Infiltration Restrictions Map 1.1.2 DRAINAGE REVIEW TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS For most projects adding 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface, the full range of core and special requirements contained in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 must be evaluated for compliance through the drainage review process. However, for some types of projects the scope of requirements applied is narrowed to allow more efficient, customized review. Each of the following four drainage review types tailors the review process and application of drainage requirements to a project's size, location, type of development, and anticipated impacts to the local and regional surface water system: • Small Site Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.1 (p. 1 -9) • Targeted Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.2 (p. 1 -10) • Full Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.3 (p. 1 -13) • Large Site Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.4 (p. 1 -13). _ Each project requires only one of the above drainage review types, with the single exception that a project which qualifies for Small Site Drainage Review may also require Targeted Drainage Review. Figure 1.1.2.A can be used to determine which drainage review type would be required. This may entail consulting the more detailed thresholds for each review type specified in the above - referenced sections. Table 1.1.2.A (next page) can be used to quickly identify which requirements are applied under each type of drainage review. The applicant must evaluate those requirements that are checked off for a particular drainage review type to determine what is necessary to meet compliance. FIGURE 1.1.2.A FLOW CHART FOR DETERMINING TYPE OF DRAINAGE REVIEW REQUIRED Is the project a single family residential project (as defined on page 1-4) that adds 2,000 to 10,000 sf of new impervious surface AND clears < 2 acres OR < 35% of the site, whichever is greater? No Does the project add 2 2,000 sf of new impervious surface within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area (LHDA) or >_ 5,000 sf outside of a LHDA, OR is it a redevelopment project costing 2 $500,000 that creates 2 5,000 sf of contiguous PGIS from new and/or replaced impervious surface? V Yes Yes 1998 Surface Water Design Manual No Does the project involve an Urban Planned Development (UPD) or meet any of the other thresholds for Large Site Drainage Review specified in Section 1.12.4 (p. 1 -13)? Does the project have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories (see the more detailed threshold language on p. 1 -10)? 1. Projects that contain or are adjacent to floodplains or sensitive areas, OR projects within a LHDA or Critical Drainage Area, OR rural zoned projects subject to areal clearing limits per KCC 16.82.150(c) 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify a drainage pipe /ditch that is 12' or larger or receives runoff from a 12' or larger drainage pipe/ditch 3. Redevelopment projects proposing >_ $100,000 in improvements to an existing high -use site N Yes No Reassess whether drainage review is required per Section 1.1.1 (p. 1-6). 1 - 7 1.1.2 DRAINAG TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS SMALL b it 1 . DRAINAGE REVIE -,Section , 21 ate Tire project mar `eiso be subject to Targeted mirage Revlew determined beto FULL DRAIN GEvR1r'YIEW RGE SITE REVIEW ection :`1 •9/1/98 LEI. 12.A REQUIREMENTS APPLIED TINDER DRAINAGE REVIEW TYPE ,, ,. .,. - . _ _• � -... a ....I . Small Site Drainage Review Targeted Drainage Review Full Drainage Review Large Site Drainage Review Single ' family residential. projects that add 2,000 to 10,000 sf of new impervious surface AND clear < 2 acres or < 35% of the site, whichever is greater. Small Site projects or other small projects that are not subject to Full or Large Site Drainage Review as deter- mined in Sections 1.1.2.3 (p. 1 -13) and 1.1.2.4 (p. 1 -13), AND which have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories of projects: 1. Projects containing or adjacent to floodplains /sensitive areas; or projects within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area (LHDA) or Critical Drainage Area; or rural zoned projects subject to areal clearing limits per KCC 16.82.150(c) 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12" or larger or receives runoff from a 12" or larger drainage pipe /ditch 3. Redevelopment projects proposing $100,000 in improvements to a high -use site.(') All projects, including redevel- opment projects, that add? 5,000 sf (2,000 sf within a LHDA) of new impervious sur- face but do not qualify for Small Site Drainage Review, OR redevelopment projects costing >_ $500,000 that create >_ 5,000 sf of contiguous PGIS from new and/or replaced impervious surface. UPDs, OR projects that result in > 50 acres of new impervious surface within a subbasin or multiple subbasins that are hydraulically connected, OR projects on sites >_ 50 acres within the recharge area of a sole- source aquifer. Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 SMALL SITE REQUIREMENTS 1� CORE REQUIREMENT #1 Discharge at Natural Location *(2) /7. CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Offsite Analysis *(2) 1(3) 1(3) _/(3) err CORE REQUIREMENT #3 Flow Control *(2) .7(3) 1./(3) CORE REQUIREMENT #4 Conveyance System *(2) CORE REQUIREMENT #5 Erosion & Sediment Control CORE REQUIREMENT #6 Maintenance & Operations *(2) 1 CORE REQUIREMENT #7 Financial Guarantees & Liability *(2) 1(3) 1(3) 1(3) 1 7(3) CORE REQUIREMENT #8 Water Quality * (2) 1 (3) 1 (3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #1 Other Adopted Requirements 1 ( (3) ✓ (3) 1(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #2 Floodpin/Floodwy Delineation 1 ((3) ✓(3) ✓(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #3 Flood Protection Facilities 1(3) 1(3) V(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #4 Source Control 1(3) 1(3) 1(3) 1(3) 1(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #5 Oil Control ✓(3) 1(3) f(3) r (1) Category 3 projects that install oil controls which construct or modify a 12 -inch pipe /ditch are also Category 2 projects. (2) May be applied by DDES based on project or site- specific conditions. (3) These requirements have exemptions or thresholds which may preclude or limit their application to a specific project. SECTION 1.1 DRAINAGE 9/1/98* 1 - 1998 Surface Water Design Manual DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FIGURE 2 INFILTRATION RESTRICTIONS Dace: September 23. 2003 49 Map Legend M Infiltration Not Allowed ` - - _ - J City Limits Not to Scale S ITE Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 CITY OF TUKWILA BULLETIN B4 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT GUIDELINES The City may require a geotechnical investigation and report based on the nature of the proposal. All of the following require a geotechnical investigation and report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer 1. Unless waived by the Building Official: • All new buildings except a residential structure that falls under the International Residential Code • Any structure, including a rockery, that retains a surcharge • Any retaining structure, including a rockery, that is over four feet above existing grade • Grease interceptors that are 1000 gallons or larger • Surface water retention /detention structures 2. Unless waived by the Department of Community Development Director: • Any work on sites containing or adjacent to slopes that are 15% or steeper • Grading that requires environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act Unless waived by the Public Works Director • Surface water infiltration • Riverbank Stability (Ordinance 2038) • Hazardous Waste Facility Design The reporting requirements for single - family permits may be waived, if a report for the site meeting the City of Tukwila's criteria has been filed Tess than five years before the date of application and the Geotechnical Engineer who signed the report prepares a written letter stating the report is still applicable to the site and currently proposed project. Similarly, reporting requirements may be waived for single - family permits if the applicant can demonstrate, to the City's satisfaction, that soil or groundwater conditions at or near the site pose little or no risk for the project. The Geotechnical Engineer determines the actual scope of investigation, analysis, and reporting necessary to meet the Standard of Practice with respect to the project and its geotechnical requirements. The report must be stamped, signed and dated by the Geotechnical Engineer. This Bulletin should not be used as a substitute for codes and regulations. Your project will be reviewed for specific compliance to codes and regulations. Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 CITY OF TUKWILA BULLETIN B4 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT GUIDELINES The attached report outline describes the contents for elements in a geotechnical report. A report submitted to the City must contain each element in the outline. The actual content under each element will depend on the nature and complexity of the project and site conditions. For example, a single family residence on a glacial till site without groundwater issues warrants a short, simple report, while a high -rise structure with a deep excavation on an alluvial site warrants a longer, much more detailed report. The report should state "Not applicable" for each outline element that does not apply. For example, shoring and retaining walls would be "Not Applicable" if the project scope does not include these items. 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER means a practicing, professional civil engineer registered with the State of Washington, who has knowledge and practice of geotechnical engineering. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING means the application of soil mechanics in the investigation, evaluation, and design of civil works involving the use of earth materials and the inspection or testing of the construction thereof. This Bulletin should not be used as a substitute for codes and regulations. Your project will be reviewed for specific compliance to codes and regulations. 'TECHNICAL REPORT CONTEN CITY OF TUKWILA 1.0 SUMMARY The summary presents the major conclusions and their basis. This section should be included in all lengthy or complex reports. 2.0 INTRODUCTION The introduction sets the stage for the entire report and contains the following sections: 2.2 OVERVIEW • Introduce the formal project name, address and parcel numbers. • Describe briefly the current or previous work used to form the basis for the conclusions and recommendations contained in the report. 2.3 BACKGROUND • Describe the project's history when relevant to the reason for the investigation. • List other reports completed for the site or adjacent sites and note whether any environmental site assessments or other environmental work has been completed. • Describe the scope of work, including grading, retaining walls, structures, construction materials, and utilities. Include dimensions, quantities, proposed finish floor elevations, maximum depth of cut or fill, foundation and floor loads, etc. • Describe all assumptions that were relied upon to develop the conclusions and recommendations contained in the report. 2.4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES • State succinctly the primary purpose for the geotechnical engineering services. • Summarize the scope of geotechnical engineering services that form the basis for the conclusions and recommendations contained in the report. • Indicate any limitations to the scope of geotechnical engineering services provided, particularly if the scope represents a departure from service typically provided on similar projects. 2.5 INVESTIGATIONS SUMMARY • Provide the dates, general nature, and extent of the geotechnical investigation. This section should include data research, borings, test pits, geophysics, physical laboratory testing, chemical testing, field instrumentation or testing, etc. • If the investigation was complex, present a complete and detailed explanation and results in the form of an appendix. 2.6 REPORT OVERVIEW • Introduce and describe other sections of the report, directing the reader to critical sections, if appropriate. • Identify and describe all attachments and appendices. Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 1 L OTECHNICAL REPORT CONTL.,.. CITY OF TUKWILA 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS Describe all site features relevant to the study and the geotechnical engineering conclusions and recommendations. Terminology should be clear and consistent, and continue to be consistent through the entire report. 3.1 LOCATION AND SURFACE CONDITIONS • Provide the cross streets, addresses and parcel numbers in order to locate the investigation. • Describe the site and adjoining properties, including surface elevation, topography and drainage. Clearly reference all elevations to the datum. • Provide current uses of the site and adjacent properties. • Identify all current structures, subsurface utilities, wells, manmade fills, and other surface features. • Describe vegetation, topsoil, paving, and other surface coverings. • Describe any indications of historic geological processes or hazards on or near the site (e.g., slope instability, landslides, liquefaction, flooding, etc.) • Describe any indications of surface releases or other contamination, or potential contamination sources. • Describe any planned changes to the surface conditions described above which will take place after the investigation. 3.2 GEOLOGIC SETTING • Provide an overview of regional geology, local stratigraphy, groundwater occurrence, etc. 3.3 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS • Describe each soil or geologic unit encountered by their classification and group units with respect to the properties that are most relevant to the conclusions and recommendations. Give each unit group a unique, clear, common title and consistently refer to this unit by its given title throughout the report. • Provide important results of the laboratory physical property testing and its indications of soil behavior. • Provide design infiltration rate per the King County Surface Water Design Manua/ (EPA Falling Head procedure) • Avoid detailed descriptions of the sequence of units found in individual borings; rather, focus on variations in the units across the site, if appropriate. Refer the reader to the exploration logs for details. • Describe any expected changes in subsurface conditions that may occur with time after the investigation. Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 2 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 j ECHNICAL REPORT CONTEN CITY OF TUKWILA ..� 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS • Describe the nature and occurrence of groundwater. • Provide an opinion on likely seasonal variations in groundwater levels or flows, and the possibility for changes from those encountered at the time of exploration. • Show groundwater levels on soil logs. 3.5 SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION • Describe the nature and extent of soil and /or groundwater contamination as revealed by the explorations. Reference any applicable Environmental Assessments if performed. • Provide important results of the analytical laboratory testing and indications about contamination distribution and concentration. • Indicate limitations of knowledge on the nature and extent of contamination. • Discuss possible changes that may occur in these conditions over time. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The Discussion and Conclusions should set out major geotechnical issues and alternative for the project, along with the Geotechnical Engineer's conclusions, in a succinct and clear manner. This section shall clearly describe the logic and reasoning supporting the recommended approach, or alternative approaches. Specific recommendations shall be very limited in this section; they should be presented in a separate Recommendations section. Discussions and conclusions should: • Build on information described in the previous sections. • Describe project features, soils, and construction materials using consistent terminology. • Explain any apparent inconsistencies in the data or investigations. • Describe clearly any limitations or restrictions to the conclusions and recommendations. 4.1 SLOPE STABILITY • Summarize data and analysis used to evaluate slope stability. • Provide an opinion regarding the risk of instability on the site or adjacent properties currently, during construction, and after the project is completed. • Describe how design and construction recommendations will reduce or eliminate the risk of instability. • Discuss any construction or post- construction measures necessary to verify slope stability. 3 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 E OTECHNICAL REPORT CONT - CITY OF TUKWILA 4.2 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS • Provide an opinion on the expected level of ground motion during a major earthquake. • Describe any seismic risks associated with an earthquake such as liquefaction, lateral spreading, landslides, or flooding. • Describe how design and construction recommendations will reduce or eliminate the impact of seismic risks, 4.3 SITE WORK • Describe proposed site grading and earthwork and provide an opinion on the proper sequence and approach to accomplish the site work. • Describe key issues which will impact earthwork, including short-term slope stability, on -site and import fill materials, groundwater and drainage, rainfall and moisture sensitive soils, and erosion. • Describe how these key issues should be addressed during construction, including dewatering, temporary retaining structures, and erosion control. • Include specific recommendations for on -site erosion control based on soil erodability and the presence of groundwater, surface water, and slopes. • Include statements regarding the importance of construction monitoring by a geotechnical engineering firm. 4.4 RETAINING STRUCTURES • Recommend appropriate temporary retaining systems. • Recommend the most appropriate permanent retaining system or systems and describe their expected performance with respect to stability and deflection. • Summarize the data and analysis used to evaluate permanent retaining systems. • Clearly define all limitations on backfill materials, reinforcement, and drainage. For reinforced soil slopes and reinforced soil backfill. • Describe the limitations on describe the limitations on such systems. • Emphasize any aspects or site work, particularly with respect to native soil materials, backfill, and drainage, which could impact performance of the retaining structures. • Include statements regarding the importance of construction monitoring by a geotechnical engineering firm. 4.5 ROCKERIES • Emphasize that rockeries usually protect a slope face from erosion. Indicate which rockeries will protect the slope face by preventing soil erosion and sloughing. • Include the design criteria for rockeries that serve as retaining structures. Indicate which rockeries will function as retaining structures. 4 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 L„ ECHNICAL REPORT CONTEN",. L CITY OF TUKWILA • Recommend locations for rockeries such that a contractor can reach them for maintenance and repair. • Discuss what type of inspection and testing may be required during rock wall construction. 4.6 FOUNDATION SUPPORT • Summarize the data and analysis used to evaluate foundation systems. • Provide an opinion on the most appropriate foundation system and alternatives, along with the expected level of performance with respect to load capacity and settlement. • Emphasize any aspects of site work that could impact the performance of foundations. • Includes statements regarding the importance of construction monitoring by a geotechnical engineering firm. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The Recommendations should present all detailed geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction in a clear and logical sequence. For each item covered in the recommendations sections, present the following: • Specific design recommendations along with their limitations, factors of safety, minimum dimensions, and effect of expected variations in actual conditions. • Specific construction recommendations including definitions, materials, execution, monitoring testing, or other quality control measures, and any other construction requirements to support the design recommendations. • Responsibility for seeing that each recommendation is met, such as owner, geotechnical engineer, other design consultants, or contractor. The owner of the project holds the ultimate responsibility; however, all design parties have shared responsibility. Construction responsibilities are directly related to the contractor. 5.1 SITE GRADING AND EARTHWORK • Provide specific design recommendations for 1) depth of stripping, 2) soil excavation limits and slopes, 3) depth and lateral limits of over - excavation to remove unsuitable materials, 4) preload fills, 5) location and thickness of particular fill material or compaction requirements, 6) maximum temporary and permanent slopes, 7) permanent surface and subsurface drainage systems, and 8) permanent erosion controls. • Provide specific construction recommendations for 1) clearing, 2) on -site and /or import fill materials, 3) excavation and compaction equipment, 4) fill material moisture conditioning, placement, and compaction, 5) proof - rolling, in -place density testing, and other quality control measures, 6) temporary seepage and drainage control measures, 7) permanent surface of subsurface drainage system installation (as appropriate), and 8) temporary slope protection and erosion control measures. 5 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 L. REPORT CONTE, , ;,� CITY OF TUKWILA • All design and construction methodologies should be specific and identifiable; no generalized or vague statements are acceptable. 5.2 TEMPORARY SHORING AND RETAINING WALLS • Provide specific design recommendations for 1) active and passive earth pressures, 2) surcharge pressures, 3) bearing capacity, 4) minimum or maximum dimensions and depth of penetration, 5) lateral support, 6) wall or backfill drainage systems, and 7) any other appropriate structured details. • . If appropriate, provide specific design recommendations for tie -back anchors including 1) anchor inclination, 2) no load zones, 3) minimum anchor length, 4) anchor bond zone, 5) anchor adhesions, and 6) corrosion protection. • Provide specific construction recommendations for 1) installation, 2) on -site and /or import backfill materials, 3) backfill material moisture conditioning, placement, and compaction, 4) in -place density testing or other control measures, and 5) seepage and drainage control. • If appropriate, provide construction recommendations for tie -back anchors including 1) anchor installation methods, 2) anchor testing, and 3) monitoring. 5.3 ROCKERIES • Provide recommendations as outlined in the Associated Rockery Contractors (ARC) Standard Rock Wall Construction Guidelines (December 1992). • The geotechnical engineer should provide direct input to the design of the rockeries and provide construction monitoring and testing as appropriate. Specific design parameters may include: Rock quality, density, frequency of testing, slopes, keyways, surcharges, drainage, rock sizes, face inclination, and surface drainage. 5.4 REINFORCED SOIL STRUCTURES • Geogrid or geotextile fabric may be used to reinforce a fill. Reinforcement results in a more stable slope and helps reduce the risk of significant Tong -term maintenance. If reinforced slopes are used, the geotechnical engineer should specify, at a minimum, the fill soil materials, vertical spacing of the reinforcement, the specific type of reinforcement and the distance to which it must extend into the fill, the amount of overlap at reinforcement joints, and the construction sequence. Additional design parameters will be required for each specific site. 5.5 STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATIONS • Provide seismic design recommendations for 1) Building Code soil type and Site Coefficients, and 2) any specific recommendations to reduce the risk of damage due to earthquakes. • Spread footing foundations - provide design recommendations for 1) bearing soils, 2) bearing capacity, 3) minimum footing depths and widths for both interior and exterior footings, 4) lateral load resistance, 5) foundation drainage systems, and 6) frost protection. 6 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 ..,,,,„fECHNICAL REPORT CONTEN CITY OF TUKWILA • Mat foundations - provide design recommendations for 1) bearing soils, 2) bearing capacity, 3) modulus of subgrade reaction, 4) minimum dimensions, and 5) lateral load resistance. • Pile foundations - provide design recommendations for 1) type of pile, 2) means of support (end of friction), 3) minimum dimensions and depths, 4) allowable vertical and uplift capacity, 5) allowable lateral loads and deflections, and 6) group effects and minimum spacing. • Spread footing or mat foundations - provide construction recommendations for 1) foundation subgrade preparation and protection, 2) verification of bearing capacity, and 3) installation of foundation drainage system. • Pile foundations - provide construction recommendations for 1) pile driving equipment, 2) pile installation, 3) pile load tests or verification piles, and 4) monitoring and testing during pile installation. 5.6 FLOORS • Slab -on -Grade Floors - provide design recommendations for 1) slab base rock thickness, 2) capillary break, 3) vapor barrier, and 4) floor system drainage. • Supported Wood Floors - provide design recommendations for 1) vapor barrier and 2) crawl space drainage. • Slab -on -Grade Floors - provide construction recommendations for 1) subgrade preparation, 2) slab base rock placement and compaction, 3) capillary break and vapor barrier installation, and 4) floor drainage system installation (if appropriate). 5.7 PAVEMENTS • Provide design recommendations for 1) pavement design section, and 2) pavement drainage. • Provide construction recommendations for 1) pavement subgrade preparation and verification, and 2) pavement base and subbase materials, placement, and compaction. 5.8 UTILITIES • Provide construction recommendations for 1) utility excavation, 2) bedding material placement, and 3) backfill material, placement, and compaction. 5.9 DRAINAGE • Recommend provisions for subsurface drainage at walls, floors, and footings. • Evaluate permanent and temporary surface and subsurface drainage for both walls and floors if applicable. Provide approximate flow rates in gallons per minute and pipe sizes if required by design. • Provide design and recommendation for infiltration facilities, including setbacks from steep slopes per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, Chapter 5 7 6.0 FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS Geotechnicai Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 OTECHNICAL REPORT CONTB , CITY OF TUKWILA 5.10 HAZARDS • Present additional information if natural or man -made hazards exist on the property. The City's Sensitive Areas maps and the Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan delineate hazards such as wetlands, streams and flood hazard, erosion, landslide, and coal mine. Recommendations should be general and further studies may be required. 1. VICINITY MAP Include a Vicinity or Location Map that presents adequate street and /or other physical references to allow clear identification of the project location. This map may be an individual figure or may be included on the Site Plan. 2. SITE PLAN Show the project boundaries, property lines, existing features and the proposed development and structures. A north arrow and scale should be included along with all subsurface exploration locations. The accuracy of exploration locations should be indicated on the Site Plan or in the report. 3. EXPLORATION LOGS Include logs of all explorations describing soil units encountered, soil classification, density or stiffness, moisture conditions, groundwater levels, stratigraphic sequence, common geologic unit name, and other descriptive information. 4. LABORATORY TEST DATA Include figures or tables of laboratory test results if presentation of all the data, in the text, would require more than a simple paragraph to supplement the data provided in the exploration logs. 5. CROSS SECTIONS Include cross sections to visually present all but the simplest subsurface conditions. 6. TYPICAL DETAILS Include figures, graphs, and other visual aids to clearly present detailed recommendations. Provide design details (stamped by a professional engineer) on drawings such as: rockeries, reinforced earth, interceptor trenches, wall and footing drains, utility backfill, and other details used for a particular design. 8 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 y — gar 'ECHNICAL REPORT CONTEN\ CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS FOR SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES 1. STUDY REQUIREMENTS a) The geotechnical engineer should review and evaluate the stability of natural, temporary, and permanently constructed slopes on or adjacent to the property to be developed. Such review should, at a minimum, include: • Review of published geologic data referencing or including the site. • Review of previous studies of the site performed by geotechnical engineers. • Reconnaissance of the site for signs of slope instability. b) Where such review indicates that the proposed development would reduce slope stability, or that the natural slopes may have a factor of safety of less than 2.0 (static case) or 1.5 (seismic case), then the geotechnical engineer shall perform additional, more detailed review and evaluation of the stability of the slope. Such additional review and evaluation should, at a minimum, include: • Drilling and sampling of test borings to a depth necessary for the evaluation of slip surfaces with factors of safety lower than the above criteria, or to at least 15 feet or 10 percent of the slope height (whichever is less) beyond the most critical slip surface for the design. • Laboratory shear testing of soil samples which are representative of all significant zones or layers of soil and /or rock through which the potential slip surfaces pass. • Performing a limit equilibrium analyses or other approved analyses of all significant critical slip surfaces associated with the slope. Approved analyses may be conducted by a computer program if the methodology and assumptions are clearly delineated and the name, version number, and solution methodology of the program are clearly presented in the report. All analyses should include a cross section of the slope(s) and critical slip surfaces. c) Other analyses as required by the City. 9 2. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS „� :OTECHNICAL REPORT CONT, CITY OF TUKWILA For a limit equilibrium analysis, design factors for safety of slopes will be no less than the following: The analysis should consider the impacts of groundwater in the modeling of soil strength and density parameters, and in other ways considered appropriate by the engineer. A conservative wet season analysis should be used for permanent slopes and those temporary slopes which will be constructed anytime between October 1 and May 31. Alternative analyses may be proposed by the geotechnical engineer and accepted by the City, if they are based upon accepted and published methodologies which evaluate static and dynamic loading cases, and the consequences of the type of slope failure under consideration. Other design requirements remain the same. 1 Permanent slopes termed "Low Threat Upon Failure" are those slopes whose failure will not impact buildings or other structures uninhabited by humans. 2 Permanent slopes termed "High Threat Upon Failure" are those slopes whose failure will impact or have a reasonable engineering probability or impacting buildings or other structures inhabited by humans. Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 10 Temporary Slope Permanent Slope Low Threat Upon Failure 1 High Threat Upon Failure 2 Static 1.25 1.40 1.50 Seismic (dynamic) 1.05 1.10 1.15 2. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS „� :OTECHNICAL REPORT CONT, CITY OF TUKWILA For a limit equilibrium analysis, design factors for safety of slopes will be no less than the following: The analysis should consider the impacts of groundwater in the modeling of soil strength and density parameters, and in other ways considered appropriate by the engineer. A conservative wet season analysis should be used for permanent slopes and those temporary slopes which will be constructed anytime between October 1 and May 31. Alternative analyses may be proposed by the geotechnical engineer and accepted by the City, if they are based upon accepted and published methodologies which evaluate static and dynamic loading cases, and the consequences of the type of slope failure under consideration. Other design requirements remain the same. 1 Permanent slopes termed "Low Threat Upon Failure" are those slopes whose failure will not impact buildings or other structures uninhabited by humans. 2 Permanent slopes termed "High Threat Upon Failure" are those slopes whose failure will impact or have a reasonable engineering probability or impacting buildings or other structures inhabited by humans. Geotechnical Report Guidelines Approved 04.24.04 10 HOLD HARMLESS - SENSITIVE AREA From City Attomey approved 2003 MAYOR must sign KC Records CITY CLERK keeps the original. DIRECTIONS 1. Read text and modify as needed. 2. If intent is modified, get attorney approval 3. Fill in the blanks 4. Insert Exhibit(s) 5. Insert appropriate Notary Page 6. Get notarized 7. Add a KC Records Cover sheet 8. Create an Information Memo 9. To PW Analyst to get Mayor's Signature 10. Request to Finance for Money to record 11. To City Clerk for Recording. 12. City Clerk sends to KC Records 13. Delete this note COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ Return to: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Above this line reserved for Recorder's use HOLD HARMLESS - SENSITIVE AREA Grantor /Borrower: Grantee /Beneficiary: CITY OF TUKWILA, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington Document Reference Number(s): Section/Township /Range: Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s): Property Legal Description (abbreviated): COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT This covenant and hold harmless agreement is entered into between , (Individual(s) (Corporation) , ( "Grantor), and the City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantee "). RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor owns and has applied for necessary permits to develop certain real property (the "Property ") legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by reference. WHEREAS, a portion of the Property contains sensitive areas of potential geologic instability (potential slide areas) as depicted in Exhibit B, which is attached and incorporated by reference. WHEREAS, as a condition of the issuance of subdivision plat approval, land use permits, and /or construction permits for the Property, the Grantee required the Grantor to execute and record this "Sensitive Area Covenant and Hold Harmless Agreement" to hold the City of Tukwila harmless from all loss incurred as a result of any landslide or seismic activity, or soil disturbance. WHEREAS, Grantor assumed this obligation in order to obtain said subdivision plat approval, land use permits, and /or construction permits for the Property. WHEREAS, the parties agree that this agreement constitutes an arms length, bargained -for agreement, which includes a waiver of liability that runs with the land for risks created by the proposed use of property because of the shape, composition, location or other characteristic unique to the Property sought to be developed. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. In consideration of Grantee issuing subdivision plat approval and /or other development permits, which constitutes good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which and the sufficiency of which the Grantor hereby acknowledges, the Grantor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Grantee, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and assigns harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, or suits, whether brought by grantor or third parties, including all legal costs and reasonable attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with any injuries or damages to persons or property caused in whole or in part by any landslide or seismic activity or soil disturbance on the Property, legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by reference. COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ 2. Grantor on its own behalf and on behalf of its heirs, successors and assigns hereby waives any right to assert any claim against the Grantee, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and assigns for any Toss, or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting from any landslide or seismic activity or soil disturbance on said Property by reason of or arising out of the issuance of the permit(s) by the City for development on said Property except only for such losses that may directly result from the sole negligence of the City. 3. Grantor will inform its successors and assigns of said Property that the Property is in an area of potential geologic instability (potential slide area), of the risks associated with development thereon, of any conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City of Tukwila, and of any features in this design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soils changes. 4. Grantor will maintain continuous insurance coverage as required by the permit authorizing the development. 5. Grantee's inspection or acceptance of any of the Grantor's construction or other work either during construction or when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. 6. This covenant and hold harmless agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and the rights and obligations contained herein shall run with and burden the Property, including each parcel comprising the Property and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Grantor and Grantee, their successors and assigns. COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ Insert appropriate GRANTOR Notary Page COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ DATED this day of , 200 GRANTOR(s): GRANTOR(s): GRANTOR(s): individual(s) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING (seal) ss. On this day of , 200_, before me a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , and , to me known to be the individual(s) that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of said individual(s), for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he /she /they was /were authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. Name: NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: Page _ of DATED this day of , 200_ GRANTOR(s): GRANTOR(s): GRANTOR(s): individual(s) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 200_, before me a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , and , to me known to be the individual(s) that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of said individual(s), for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he /she /they was /were authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. (seal) ) ) ) ss. Name: NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: Page _ of DATED this day of , 20 GRANTEE: CITY OF TUKWILA ATTEST: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King Mayor City Clerk ) ss. On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and , known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of CITY OF TUKWILA, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. print name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ EXHIBIT B DEPICTION OF SENSITIVE AREAS COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT — Sensitive Area Page _ of _ Pt • ••• now Moo tU SP 14 26 •SS A! 240 120420 I Lios 2 • • L01 1 P - • . „ IS 4. IP I r SS 14 15 4 — ! „ If • 4 0 ' p c 0 AF sc>eztoszs sI 03 . At ot• .1 — 1,1911I Permit #: Project Name: Date: Plan Reviewer: January 20, 2005 (P:Laurie Admin/Joanna/Comments L04 -077) L04 -077 Wetzler Short Plat 14734 59 Ave S CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. GEOTECHNICAL Part of the property is within Class 2 sensitive areas, therefore, the Building Department and Public Works will require a geotechnical report that meets Bulletin B4. The report should be prepared by a geotechnical engineer as defined in TMC 16.54 and TMC 18.06 both recently updated and adopted by council, and the King County Surface Water Design Manual. A Sensitive Area Covenant and Hold Harmless Agreement shall be executed and recorded. The geotechnical report will be sent for a peer review paid for by the applicant. Please provide $2000 to cover the initial review with your geotechnical report. SURFACE WATER The property is within an area where infiltration is not allowed (see attached Infiltration Restrictions map). Public Works will allow infiltration and low impact development if the soil conditions per the goetechnical report can accommodate infiltration. Based on 1998 KC Surface Water Design Manual flow chart for determining type of drainage review required, your proposal shall be subject to a full drainage review and not small drainage review. The City does not allow through curb outlets. Pipe shall be connected to the existing storm drainage system in the street and a new catch basin shall be installed. Please have your civil engineer set up an appointment with Mr. Ryan Larson, PW Senior Water Engineer, at (206) 431 -2456 to discuss surface water design issues. STREET LIGHTING A streetlight is required on the east side of 58 Avenue South at the intersection of the private road and a public street as defined in TMC 11.12.110. The streetlight shall match the existing system (Town & Country type concrete pole). Applicant shall contact Puget Sound Energy for street light location and coordination. SANITARY SEWER Since the length of the proposed sanitary sewer along the south property line exceeds 150 feet, it falls under the private sewer main extension category; therefore a manhole shall be installed 150 feet east from the existing sewer main. The new sewer tap shall be a cut in with romac sleeve and coupling. WATER Show location of the nearest fire hydrant and distance to the property corner. Decembe> = Chuck Wetzler 5715 S. 147 St. Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: Proposed Short Plat L04 -077 Dear Mr. Wetzler: Your application for a four lot short plat located at 14734 59 Avenue South has been found to be complete on December 8, 2004 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. ` This notice of complete application applies only to the permit identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. I will contact you after other City Departments have reviewed this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, please call me at (206) 431 -3683. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director cc: Engineer, Public Works Fire Prevention, Fire Department NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION \\ TUK2 \VOL3 \HOME \REBECCA \59th Av shrt plt L04- 077\COMPLETE app notice — Wetzler.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -36J0 • Fax: 206 -4 465 October 19, 2004 Project Overview: Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same Subject: Technical Information Report (TIR) for Wetzler 4 -Lot Short Plat, Tukwila Short Plat, 14734 59th Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 (Chuck Wetzler) Table of Contents: Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet (attached as cover) Project Overview Conditions and Requirements Summery Off Site Analysis Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Conveyance System Analysis and Design Special Reports and Studies Other Permits ESC Analysis and Design Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries and Declarations of Covenant Operations Manual The site is 150 feet by 200 feet, and is 30,000 SF or 0.69 acres. It is located on the east side of 59th Avenue S. approximately 200 feet north of S. 149th Street. The existing site consists of one lot of 0.69 acres with an existing residence. A total of four residential Tots will be created by the short plat, with the existing residence occupying Lot 4. The three remaining lots of from 6,518 SF, or 0.15 acres, to 8,500 SF, or 0.20 acres, each are located east and south of the lot with the residence. They are proposed for the future construction of three new residences. Access for all four lots will be accessed by a new 20 foot wide asphalt paved common driveway entering the property from 59th Avenue S. The .drainage improvements related to the new common driveway and the three new residences are the subject of this report. The site is gently rolling, with a slight to moderate downhill slope to the south. Ground cover of the lot is a uniform maintained lawn, with scattered minor ornamental and fruit trees. The existing residence has established landscaping around its perimeter. The project has existing concrete curb, gutter and five foot sidewalk along its frontage. No frontage improvements are proposed as part of this short plat. Soils on site are suitable for shallow infiltration, and the common driveway along with all three new residences are proposed for runoff infiltration on site. The residential driveway runoff for the three new residences will be collected and infiltrated with the common driveway runoff. Overflow from all residential and common driveway infiltration systems will be released to the 59th Avenue S. roadside system. Conditions and Requirements: The total impervious surface area proposed for the short plat is estimated to be 6,450 SF, including the existing residence, the common driveway and the three residences, excluding driveways. Not included is the roof area for each new residence, which will be infiltrated on site in individual systems sized for the impervious actual areas of the residences. Due to topography, the small westernmost portion of the common driveway cannot be captured by the on site system, and its area is not included in the above. An on site catch basin will capture this small amount of runoff and pipe it directly to a roadside catch basin, preventing runoff crossing over the sidewalk. The area of this non - infiltrated runoff is equal to or smaller than the area of the existing driveway serving the existing residence from the street which will be removed. This places the project in the range where the Small Site design criteria are acceptable (less than 10,000 SF), but requiring a full drainage review (greater than 5,000 SF The residential roof runoff infiltration will, however, be designed per the Small Site Criteria, as well as erosion and sediment control measures for the site as a whole. Systems for each residence will be installed per above. Infiltration systems for each lot will be based on the actual percolation rate found in the tests performed for each lot. Specifics will be provided under each building permit application. Off -Site Analysis: ,This downstream analysis is based on a Level 1 review. At present runoff from the site flows south via sheet flow the neighboring properties to the south and tilen west into the roadside system of 59th Avenue S., this being a distance of approximately 250 feet. No apparent problems exist with runoff in this area, and the possibility of future problems is minimized by the infiltration on site of substantial runoff from previously contributing areas. From there it flows by a series of catch basins and pipe to a point in the juncture of 59th Avenue S. and S. 149th Street, where it crosses under the road and flows southwest into the site drainage system for Tukwila Elementary School. The routing within the school 2 grounds could not be clearly followed, however the routing to the southeast through the site is by a series of catch basins and pipe installed with the new school building and site renovation approximately five years ago. This routing through the school property carries the evaluation substantially through the one - quarter mile distance from the project site. It will be added that the routing of flows from the school system leads to an eventual release at approximately the intersection of 63rd Avenue S. and S. 151st Street and thence due south in the undeveloped right -of -way of 63rd Avenue S. The one lot deep row of existing residences between the school yard and 63rd Avenue S. most likely has an existing easement to the City for a piped drainage routing across the properties. It is presumed that the drainage system installed for the school and its routing downstream were evaluated during the design work for the new school. In summery, no downstream erosion or conveyance capacity problems were noted or believed to exist. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design: The site is subject to Small Site design criteria. This criteria will be used for disposal of runoff from the common driveway and the roofs of the three new residences, and for the erosion and sediment control for the site. Due to topography, little or no off site contributing runoff enters the site. All new impervious area in infiltrated on site. The only factor which would affect off site downstream flows is the installation of a minor overflow line from the infiltrations systems on the site, which would only experience flows during very heavy and long term storm events. Since the soils were not sand or gravels, actual percolation tests were done on each of the three lots. The drainage infiltration systems for the common driveway and for each of the three lots were then sized using the KCRTS system. Calculations are attached. Roof infiltration systems will be used on each of the three new residences and will be sized based on actual size of impervious area for each at the time of building permit application. Conveyance System Analysis and Design: Special Reports and Studies: None. There is no significant conveyance system associated with this site. The • overflow system should handle the minor and occasional flow events without further evaluation. 3 Other Permits: Residential building permits for each of the three new Tots, including associated utility installation. A right -of -way permit will be required for the installation of the small overflow line through the existing curb. ESC Analysis and Design: The site will use conventional standard filter fence along the downhill property Tine and rock construction entrance at the location of the shared driveway. Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries and Declaration of Covenant: Bonds quantities are provided on the Bond Quantity Worksheet, attached. A facility summary is provided for the shared common driveway infiltration trench system. Operations and Maintenance Manual: A facility operation/maintenance manual is provided for the access road bio- swale and detention system. Questions relating to this Technical Information Report may be made directly to this office ruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer 1 ✓: WETZLERTIR01.doc Please note that the detailed site drainage calculations and other misc. items are attached. 4 EXPIRES: 4/24/ o r Yo s : `1,e .70 -rep /aq �� i t/ /9 '7'4E M0649 4 PR•410k#4 -4 ,■ Sys 7�r aster � 7.2/ 4 6"4/7/A.. �i5r3/s' ('L c .d 7/ u &YS - ,' / >....E: ,F.4..s /.Y //o . . P /s -SC; >/. /.s, 19. .4 IS 2 / 2 /1/, 7":: R o /902Cr11 A/C ,= /c oA To /'/e No &'r.Es (3) //A ve /1 .Se al A 7-.E /I e 5 /E `-r /F:04, /16 (-4' PR /vE y ,r ,c 4 'v / ?/ I- o , e_L .9lgEx/ oc P.P / vat ' RG Q 4'S/!L L FL U w 7o S7/2 7 S y S 7 /E s''/, 7/-oe/ S /s m2 cr _QV/ 4- 1 - C/t7' 70 ,5x .> //s- ly. w IQ 5r kolia D i9/ .4 e iv i c/ w /-/ / f/ Ar 7 /et v ,fie / /t/ v v,K,p /h' 7.e/ / /¢/2O"A S /1 G E pl P F/y - i2 711( 57 D £' C✓ A D G .e" G v 1/ / r, A No, /Zo j c 5 ' _ C .760 - (:),/4C A c... d , e'4Z ,4L l , Apo x ?v I -,-- 70 r x Zo i . AGO S,* O o78 Ac- ti A z0' .� AR a t S = ),` 2 0 )c 3 h . = / Z oo .5"; = 0, 0Z8 A c , A-s ? ' ,Pa /949 // "Pi ,;',S 7 . -' - / '7A ii/ avS 4x, ,4 j> 24 vk & J!7�" lS GEt/�� Z fGew ea,rw2 , 2 Y1 1 /0 V,4 f E.4-,. S 24 � 7iv (IV //Yf/ t -7/ Y/ Oey SYS y'£ ' 1 4}/ /Q - }-,e Sa-d .e.4-, 2 > v› A e 7a.2. 404 2, v 3,J pP a d / D E & arc c1 d 1/•-#1--- GI- 'W ?o ..5>1 '*7 SYsbrE04+ 1'C 7S P,'o‘.n 4 77? Eric cis S / . :/ OE "SEAt 7._C_ a. 042 4 D •d713 A CS 0.008 ,4c o, /4 5 O . / o 4- A c_ o. 2Sz A �� ��2 DES v G 7 ..S' Al 11.01• OZ" W C1 7 -Y- t IE ^ r9a. 4" (_n> /, / L 7/ 'W ENG / ,3�' S /2 L) / N � 't6d( PIERCE COUNTY ' e�3i r.rc. =� SUMMARY ;ORFLOW .. -: e. .— ...'.. -',. ...... i a Y . • s J � ° 4 .f 1Y4 M∎ITROI PERE G L�RKI ��� ... �s � „h MITIGATION " /rZ .. :'.:.:... XORlIMPACT- ,. ' . •. ...r1. ; 5 tr. C,.:: .:.. ..XV Er... Downstream Problems Identified through Offsite Analysis per Core Requirement #2 AREA - SPECIFIC STANDARD Level 1 Flow Control Level 2 Flow Control Level 3 Flow Control o problem identifie . Apply basic standard performance criteria atch 2 -yr & 10 -yr peaks Match durations for 50% of 2 -yr through 50-yr peaks Match durations for 50% of 2 -yr though 50 -yr peaks AND match 100 -year peaks Type 1 Conveyance System Nuisance Problem Additional Flow Control Hold 1 O yr peak to overflow T, peak No additional flow control or other mitigation is needed No additional flow control or other mitigation is needed Type 2 Severe Erosion Problem Additional Flow Control No additional flow control is needed, but other mitigation may be requiredl No additional flow control is needed, but other mitigation may be requiree Apply Level 2 flow control"' Type 3 Severe Flooding Problem Additional Flow Control Additional Flow Control Additional Flow Control Apply Level 3 flow control. If flooding is from conveyance system overflow, Level 3 may be modified to match durations above the overflow T, peak rather than 50% of the 2 -yr peak. If flooding is from a closed depression, make design adjustments as needed to meet the "special provision for closed depressions"t Apply Level 3 flow control. If flooding is from a closed depression, make design adjustments as needed to meet the "special provision for closed depressionsu If flooding is from a closed depression, make design adjustments as needed to meet the "special provision for closed depressions” (3)(5) Notes: t'i More than one set of problem - specific performance criteria may apply if two or more downstream problems are identified through offsite analysis per Core Requirement #2. If this happens, the performance goals of each applicable problem- specific criteria must be met. This can require extensive, time- consuming analysis to implement multiple sets of outflow performance criteria if additional onsite flow control is the only viable option for mitigating impacts to these problems. In these cases, it may be easier and more prudent to implement the Level 3 flow control standard In place of the otherwise required area - specific standard. Use of the Level 3 flow control standard satisfies the specified performance criteria for all the area- specific and problem- specific requirements except if adjustments are required per the special provision for closed depressions described below in Note 5. , (2) Overflow T, Is the retum period of conveyance system overflow. To determine T, requires a minimum Level 2 downstream analysis as detailed in Section 2.3.1.1. To avoid this analysis, a 7', of 2 years may be assumed. (3) Offsite improvements may be implemented in lieu of or in combination with additional flow control as allowed in Section 1.2.2.2 (p. 1 -22) and detailed in Section 3.3.5. (4) A tightiine system may be required regardless of the flow control standard being applied if needed to meet the discharge requirements of Core Requirement #1 (p. 1 -17) or the outfall requirements of Core Requirement #4 (p. 1-41), or is deemed necessary by DDES where the risk of severe damage is high. (5) Special Provision for Closed Depressions with a Severe Flooding Problem: IF the proposed project discharges by overland flow or conveyance system to a closed depression experiencing a "severe flooding problem" AND the amount of impervious surface area proposed by the project is greater than or equal to 10% of the 100 -year water surface area of the closed depression, THEN use the "point of compliance analysis technique" described in Section 3.3.6 to verify that water surface levels are not increasing for the return frequencies at which flooding occurs, up to and including the 100 -year frequency. If necessary, iteratively adjust onsite flow control performance to prevent increases. Note: The "point of compliance analysis" relies on certain field measurements taken directly at the closed depression (e.g., soils tests, topography, etc.). If permission to enter private property for such measurements Is denied, DDES may waive this provision and apply the Level 3 flow control standard with a mandatory 20% safety factor on the storage volume. SECTION 1.2 CORE REQUIREMENTS 9/1/98 1 -26 1998 Surface Water Design Manual c , ? s 5", L 52- / 7z x. lLS 1 _J SL Z 176 . ,��sv L - z ' J 't ( 9 4 T 24- N etrEG mw .Sv/ Cam. I/0"k7 7o L o 4 s d A S 7 /0 0.--1 ( ±i ,GIs PlP,c - So i4 fC , sZe 5L? ('Z / 7% 7� 2oYu t /, 375 z s Z, (2S s " o i z 0 4 - 1 2> J')L `t, S2 / — u d — f SsIMl- l,V / i' 07 re .w4j 5 L 3 � s /64 7°_ / 9 /5 70 Z.GZc -u .„ 7, 6 �`�' p S i'' �� r -r. 7/•i!. Z?g e a'- y s'' 2 vs. Z- / � , X2 4 .Z4- 9,i 2 3/Z = l7� 8 4 � / / /w., /P,y ..c 4 0. c , - „8, R6 „/H. „N , 18` y ? %B -3/e (9' - 7 2 : 15 34 / 7?- .7o'° Ze 2 0 t7 Zovii 7' 2y i At 72 2o' -0 ' Z 47 1754 - Of! 1, 6` //0 � /b 7 -e . p • 3 6 0 45- 20/ 7T- ��9 e /2 7 S S v c.-as G , PA 7 E / 7. 9 C GY / fl' 4 , #4 5 (cs-s) of 077 O .0 -3 d ,a 47 o , v4 , • o39 6 6 , 0 3 7 o ,d3z DFP7U icF Attc Z 3 4 r g S R'r" , P ie.. (>'r s) / es o zs � o .4- D DS, FvL5r< 3 Z /. 3 /./ m.o r — 5 f P FS ,f /OR e'..e2 57 k4 L, L Q 1 5 z0 GcJ itorN c = /7,44 USE 6. _ �� a 4 .'. C I Z. be. = 2 k / 2.5` � = 2 S' ■ 7 - / 2 5 d Y C 1 - 1 . O (� K 2 S" / Z4 4, a S� • sz / /a e- 7c,2s A Zo / -- 3 0 7 / �r- . e‘t Z M /Ae/ /.y, U,SE 2' •0& p ?C Z f l• e /1) / 49 4 '. /2 ? ,L 7 P / 2 s Ac. (--//, ova 07-- Z /E72c.. • S it-7//v///...e_. E1/ ke2 7S 2 fFn OA( /0 y� ) i ✓� < << Vf Li / /,voo S� Zd-r- 3 PEA e . /44..te, 7 g 00 y N i ve, S7 v j e?oltSZtcty -60 .= 8 j GFlj pv U 55 ? L l/ o,a • e j 'I f _o 0„ /0 yam- Da/ vE s'yor� k - f S 43,5 = / 7Lp 4 vv4;) ENGINEER DEVELOPER Name &IR v e,E' S #' • (//4.4 PZ Name eXes" /e Wes' TZ L CA- Finn Sig Pi Firm -�— Address /4244" Sy 7. e"‘ A V E. S, Address 4 S. /47 re Sr, 7v eve /t a_ w.4 9`63 /6 8 Tv ie t.v/ t A WA FEue , S Phone (Z06) Z4-6 - Phone (Zo 6) Z44-- S,jei DESIGN INFORMATION INDIVIDUAL BASIN Immediate Major Basin B C � Basin A 7"e-e/ s✓ /L,Q- ei ' Ems. -r ' / 1/E /2 Water Quality treated volume or wetpond Vr Basin B Basin C Basin D DESIGN INFORMATION INDIVIDUAL BASIN A j B C � 1,2."...../ Water Quality design flow / Water Quality treated volume or wetpond Vr Developed Site: Acres D' 65' w KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL STORMVVATER FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET Ci` /dC W s✓.E 7'2 LPL Z Development Q""L 07 :s // r P(47 Date I / v '04- Location ,+ 7 ? S ' ' .04'n"i .S. 77.0,f' 4/ /G 4 Wig !F8 /6 f� Number of detention facilities on site: ponds vaults 0' tanks Flow control provided in regional facility No flow control required Downstream Drainage Basins Number of lots 4 Number of infiltration facilities on site: ponds / 7 e ErreW d w 1 Y vaults Fo..t e'o. -i r-10,' ,p y tanks F4. ,7o I"F, s e v (give location) /',"4 Exemption number Number & type of water quality facilities on site: biofiltration swale (regular /wet/ or continuous inflow ?) combined detention/WQ pond (WQ portion basic or large ?) combined detention/wetvault compost filter filter strip flow dispersion farm management plan landscape management plan 1998 Surface Water Design Manual sand filter (basic or large ?) sand filter, linear (basic or large ?) sand filter vault (basic or large ?) stormwater wetland wetpond (basic or large ?) wetvault :eV w / 7: E / /17''d �JS //C/L7/2. 74 .� *r.� oil/water separator (baffle or coalescing plate ?) • //2 evp " c a' ' Dfr/ i:J ; G../ /'-f t> catch basin inserts. Manufacturer pre - settling pond pre- settling structure: Manufacturer flow - splitter catclibasin 9/1/98 DESIGN INFORMATION, cont'd TOTAL INDIVIDUAL BASIN Drainage basin(s) Onsite area A B C . -D—' —" _■— Offsite area Type of Storage Facility Live Storage Volume Predeveloped Runoff Rate 2 -year .- 10 -year 100 -year Developed runoff rate 2 -year 10 -year 100 -year Type of restrictor Size of orifice/restriction No 1 No.2/ ' No.''3 No. 4 V. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET SKETCH All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a sketch per the following criteria: 1. Heading for the drawings should be located at the top of the sketch (top right -hand corner). The heading should contain: • North arrow (point up or to left) • D9# • Plat name or short plat number . • Address (nearest) • Date drawn (or updated) • Thomas Brothers page, grid number 2. Label CBs and MHs with the plan and profile designation. Label the control structure in writing or abbreviate with C.S. Indicate which structures provide spill control. 3. Pipes -- indicate: Pipe size. Pipe length Flow direction Use s single heavyweight line 4. Tanks— use a double, heavyweight line and indicate size (diameter) 5. Access roads • Outline the limits of the road • Fill the outline with dots if the road is gravel. Label in writing if another surface. 6. Other Standard Symbols: • Bollards:• ••• ■••• • Rip rap 000000 • 000000 Fences -•x =ic--- • •Ditches — D-- -+-D-- -►D- -' -D 7. Label trash racks in writing. 8. Label all streets with the actual street sign designation. If you don't know the actual street name, consult the plat map. 9. Include easements and lot lines or tract limits when possible. 10. Arrange ill the labeling or writing to read from left to right or from bottom to top with reference to a properly oriented heading. 11. Indicate driveways or features that may impact access, maintenance or replacement. 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 2 Part 5',. COMMUNITY AND D IA Community 7 U,e//A /e - q Drainage Basin C A / ?/ / . River King County Department of Development and.Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Owner Project wE r ER Address 5 s. /474"" S 77/.4e c.44, w.a re/ 6 6 Phone (206)2¢¢— S3 Project Engine , vt� 3 • /7p t Vim, 6w, )1E_ Goraparsy /4245 S9' YE, 3 'TV1..!w/44 woo 96 6 Address /Phone /706 2 4 Z — 7‘ 6 s Part S ;. TPP APPL1CATIO Subdivison S ho bdivnsno Grading Commercial Other Part 6 :SITE CHARACTERIST Stream Critical Stream Reach Depressions /Swales Lake Steep Slopes L,. ;Part ;PP..ROJECT-LOCATION AND • 1DES Project Name Location Township Range Section 23 iv 4 z 3. in QT-IER;REVIEWSAN N DFW HPA COE 404 DOE Dam Safety FEMA Floodplain COE Wetlands Shoreline Management Rockery Structural Vaults Other Floodplain Wetlands Seeps /Springs High Groundwater Table Groundwater Recharge Other -52 01 6 /d Soil Type Slopes /d 7-a Additional Sheets Attached Erosion Potential Mob. Erosive Velcoties Parrs ♦DEU.ELORMENTt 471:740 REFERENCE UMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Ch. 4 — Downstream Analysis '� A/o. Additional Sheets Attached Para s � SCREQ • • .MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION S edimentation Facilities �fabilized Construction Entrance metier Runoff Control Clearing and Graing Restrictions Cover Practices Construction Sequence Other sow MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION abilize Exposed Surface move and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas Other Part 10' ESURF ACEWATEI I,S,Y:FM; Grass Lined Channel Pipe System Open Channel Dry Pond Wet Pond Tank Vault Energy Dissapator Wetland Stream infUtr Depression Flow Dispersal Waiver Regional Detention Method of Analysis // OW ,r Compensation/Mitigati on of Eliminated Site Storage Brief Description of System Operation ° r ime (O''"`'' a Peg v''. 1a �.c>/!/6' cpe 4 #f >•i" e'' /7 � �sV fY 7' v //s/l /! y/•? . 'Me 4=NrC Facility Related Site Limitations 1"—/14) ./L vA, /`.,�,7A.."/9 l'' Reference Facility Limitation Part11 �:STRUCT IIRAL Cast in Place Vault Retaining Wall Rockery > 4' High Structural on Steep Slope Other . SEMENTS1TRAGT.S • age Easement Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement Tract Other Part 131.'SIGNATURE OPPRQFES$I a. Q I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. sue TICOR TITLE COMPANY 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 120, Renton, WA 98055 (425)255 -7575 FAX (425)255 -0285 INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: UNIT 1 (425)255 -7472. . Donna Roetter Jami Burkhardt Melissa Harkins COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE NO. Effective Date: March 30, 2004 at 08:00 AM 1. Policy or policies to be issued: 1998 •ALTA Homeowner's Policy Coverage: Homeowners Liability: $ 301,000.00 Premium: $ 829.00 Tax $ 72.95 Proposed Insured: 1992 . ALTA Loan Policy Coverage: Extended Liability: $ 0.00 Premium: $ 0.00 Tax $ 0.00 Proposed Insured: SCHEDULE A Customer Reference: Kreidler/Wetzier & Devlin N 0k V SO 6320361 -1 l ��� �'FC Evr Charles Wetzler and William Devlin, both presumptively subject to the - community interest of their respective spouses, if married If ALTA Standard Coverage Policy is preferred, please contact the title unit. The reduced premium for a Standard Coverage Policy is $727.00; Tax $63.98. to) 9 ,05. •41 TO FOLLOW e (its America One Finance, its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear. 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is a Fee Simple. 3. TICOR TITLE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on the preliminary commitment; Fee Simple title to the property described herein is vested, on the date shown above, in: Mary K. Kreidier, as her separate estate subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions, and exceptions contained in the policy form. 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE SCHEDULE A CONTINUED Commitment Schedule A Commitment No. 6320361 SCHEDULE A (Continued) Commitment No. 6320361 -1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: That portion of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10, of Plats, page(s) 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning on the east line of 59th Avenue South at a point 20 feet south of the intersection of said east line with the adjudicated line between Tracts 4 and 5 of the aforesaid addition; thence along the east line of 59th Avenue South 150 feet thence east 200 feet on a line parallel with said adjudicated line; thence north 150 feet on a fine parallel with the east line of 59th Avenue South; thence west 200 feet on a line parallel with and 20 feet south of the aforesaid adjudicated line to the point of beginning. Commitment No. 6320361 -1 SCHEDULE B Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Rights or claims disclosed only by possession, or claimed possession, of the premises. B. Encroachments and questions of location, boundary and area disclosed only by inspection of the premises or by survey. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights -of -way, streets, roads, alleys or highways not disclosed by the public records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as Imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing lien by the public records. F. Any service, Installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations. and .exceptions In United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. H. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. I. Water rights, claims or title to water. J. Defects, li ens, encumbrances,•adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public. records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or Interest or mortgage thereon . covered by this commitment • SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: MORTGAGOR Mary K Kreidler MORTGAGEE: King County Housing Rehabilitation AMOUNT: $7,108.07 DATED: March 14, 1997 RECORDED: April 7, 1997 RECORDING NUMBER: 9704070192 2. MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: MORTGAGOR: Mary K Kreidler MORTGAGEE: King County Housing Rehabilitation AMOUNT: $13,795.90 DATED: March 5, 2001 RECORDED: March 16, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010316000843 3. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD ": If the subject property is, or will be, the residence of a marital community, even thoi.igh the interest therein • may be intended to be the separate property of either spouse, execution of the proposed encumbrance, conveyance or contract to convey must be by both husband and wife,.pursuant to R.C.W. 6.13, which provides for an "automatic homestead ", and R.C.W. 26.16.030. 4. General property taxes and special district charges, as follows, together with interest, penalty and Commitment Schedule B Commitment No. 6320361 -1 SCHEDULE B (Continued) statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1st; 2nd half delinquent on November 1st) Total Taxes for Year 2004 Amount Billed: $2,454.91 Amount Paid:. $0.00 Amount Due: $2,454.91 END OF SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Tax Account Number. 359700- 0083-03 Levy Code: 2380 Current Assessed Value: Land: $70,000.00 Improvements: $113,000.00 .5. Payment of Real Estate Exdse Tax, if required. The property described herein is Situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of the City of Tukwila. Present Rate of Real Estate Exdse Tax as of the date herein Is 1.78 %. 6: Title Is to vest in Charles Wetzier and William Devlin, and will then be subject to: Matters which may be disdOsed by a search of the records against the name of the spouse of Charles Wetzler and William Devlin, if married. 7. QUESTION OF THE EXISTENCE OF AN "AUTOMATIC HOMESTEAD": If the subject property is, or will be, the residence of a marital community, even though the interest therein may be intended to be the separate property of either spouse, execution of the proposed encumbrance, conveyance or contract to convey must be by both husband and wife, pursuant to R.C.W. 6.13, which provides for an "automatic homestead", and R.C.W. 26.16.030. In the event matters are discovered during the dosing process which would.otherwise be insured by the Covered Risks included in the policy, the Company may limit or delete insurance provided by the affected Covered Risk. In such event', a supplemental will be issued prior to closing. • .Generat exceptions A through H - will not appear in the ALTA Homeowners Policy. All matters have been deared for ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance. NOTES: A. The language contained in the printed Exceptions from coverage and Conditions and Stipulations of the Policy committed for may be examined by inquiry at the office which Issued the Commitment, and a specimen copy of the insurance Policy Form(s) referred to in this Commitment will be fumished promptly upon request. B. Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance, or connection charges for sewer, water, electricity or Metro Sewer Treatment Capacity Charge. C. In the event the transaction. faits to dose and this commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to - comply with the State Insurance Code and the filed schedule of this Company. • D. Covered Risks 14, 15, 16 and 18 contained in the ALTA Homeowner's Policy including certain deductibles and maximum dollar limits to coverage. The Covered Risks, the deductibles and our maximum dollar limit Commitment Schedule B of liability are: Commitment Schedule B RE/MAX Eastside Brokers, Inc. Re/Max Eastside Brokers, Inc. cw /ga/04/13/2004 Commitment No. 6320361 -1 SCHEDULE B (Continued) Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Umit Covered Risk 14: 1% of Policy Amount, or $10,000.00 $2,500.00 (whichever Is less) Covered Risk 15: 1% of Policy Amount, or $10,000.00 $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 16: 1.% of Policy Amount,- or . $25,000.00 $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount, or $ 5,000.00 . $2,500.00 (whichever Is less) E. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of Fling County Recorders Office Is: Ptn Interurban Add to Seattle, Vol 10155 . F. The records of Fling County and/or our inspection Indicate that the address of the improvement located on said land is: 14734 59th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 A Single Family Residence According to the King County Tax Rolls the dwelling was built in 1953. All matters have been cleared for ALTA Extended Policy coverage and/or Homeowners Endorsement coverage. H. The Loan Policy to be issued will contain a Form 8.1 (Environmental Protection Lien) Endorsement. I. We find no adverse matters affecting the name(s) of Charles Wetzler and William Devlin, in the Fling County records. cc: Hartman Escrow America One Finance END OF SCHEDULE B Commitment No. 6320361 -1 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE TICOR TITLE COMPANY, a California corporation, by TICOR TITLE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, its authorized agent, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue the policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor, all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement This Commitment is preliminary to the Issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations, hereunder shall cease and terminate one hundred eighty (180) days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. TICOR TITLE COMPANY Q • „ , L 1 v 0 0 44 0 r N CO CU ties _• • N m DiY A rcv L•` mJ � (0 1 a •of -S-IL towlf H N N ( to 0,1 n gill N . N . tp . O x0Ci .GD el ]L,,. mil' i w�� yM ���:.��rwYIWYT ' ., oz oc asp we CO kt Q 0 N A Yi to 0 J 4 N 0 tp lot , R i ] z9' ott or ( 3 %y r+3 yx 1—$'Tan-M1.69 .4 LI jL % o • i OY -18 - N m 'b i.6 • fF� OS{ N4 rS'Co :9401 • • 0NO3 •o•ss ID . -CO -CO AN WS CO 0 Operation and Maintenance Manual for Stormwater Collection and Detention System Chuck Wetzler 4 -Lot Residential Short Plat 14734 59th Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 Table of Contents: Operations of System Inspection Checklist November 4, 2004 Prepared by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same Operation and Maintenance of Short Plat Storm System The operation of both the common and individual lot portions of the system is simple and requires only occasional inspections and maintenance procedures. Attached within this manual is a set of checklists with scheduling and maintenance requirements. The commonly maintained storm system consists of a catch basin with an infiltration trench, placed the middle of the common private road. The catch basin is equipped with a tee to prevent silts and floating debris and oil from reaching the trench. It is the joint responsibility of all of the homeowners to inspect, clean and maintain this part of the system. The handling of this joint responsibility is spelled out in the storm drainage easement recorded with the original short plat. The water from the individual roof tops of the three new residences is handled separately for each lot with each system designed and installed as part of the building permit. The storm system for each lot will be similar to the catch basins and trenches used for the road, and maintenance procedures will be the same. Each homeowner should check their copy of the plan for their own house's system to locate the sump with tee, one of which is located on each individual lot. The inspection, cleaning and maintenance for this sump is the same as for catch basins, and is each homeowner's individual responsibility. Note that along with each lot's sump, the house downspouts and gutters should be checked and cleaned each year, or more often. Doing this will also reduce the work in cleaning out the sediment sump for each lot when the time comes. Details for the all systems inspection and clean out, for both floating debris and sediment in the bottom of all catch basins, are given in the attached checklists, along with maintenance items which may affect the system's proper operation. h. Questions about inspection and maintenance of this facility may be directed to Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E., Civil Engineer, (206) 242 -7665. INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF MAINTENANCE CHECKLISTS The following pages contain maintenance needs for most of the components that are part of your drainage system, as well as for some components that you may not have. Ignore the requirements that do not apply to your system. You should plan to complete a checklist for all system components on the following schedule: 1. Monthly from November through April 2. Once in late 'summer (preferable September) 3. After any major storm (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline), items marked "S" only. Using photocopies of these pages, check off the problems you looked for each time you did an inspection. Add comments on problems found and actions taken. Keep these "checked" sheets in your files. Some items do not need to be looked at every time an inspection is done. Use the suggested frequency at the left of each item as a guideline for your inspection. REQUIRED ACTIONS: The following actions shall be taken to ensure that pollution generated on site shall be minimized: 1. Warning signs (e.g., "Dump No Waste - Drains to Stream ") shall be painted or embossed on or adjacent to all storm drain inlets. They shall be repainted as needed. Contact the Municipality regarding availability of stenciling supplies. 2. Parking Tots shall be swept when necessary to remove debris and, at a minimum, twice a year. Use of newer model high - velocity vacuum sweepers is recommended as they are more effective in removing the more harmful smaller particles from paved surfaces. 3. Sediment removed from detention vaults shall be disposed of in a proper manner. Contact the Municipality for instruction prior to completing this task. 4. No activities shall be conducted on site that are likely to result in short-term high - concentration discharge of pollution to the stormwater system. Such activities may include, but not be limited to, vehicle washing, vehicle maintenance, and cleaning of equipment used in the periodic maintenance of buildings and paved surfaces. 5. Employees shall receive basic instruction regarding the control of pollution from commercial operations. Contact the Department of Ecology for assistance in completing this task. Frequency D Drainage / / P Problem C Conditions To Check For C Conditions That Should F Kev: ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Catch Basins and Inlets A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S =After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Infiltration Systems If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. • Comments: Key: A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S=After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) J - 21 Frequency Drainage System Feature v Problem ' Conditions to Check For Conditions That Should Exist M.S • •• General . Trash & debris buildup in pond See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Cheddist for Ponds. M Poisonous vegetation . See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M,S Fre hazard or pollution See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Chec$dist for Ponds. M Vegetation not growing or is overgrown • See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M Rodent holes See Mairdenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M Insects See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checidist for Ponds. A Storage area • Sediment buildup in system . _ A sod texture test indicates facility is not woridng at its designed capabEcties or was incorrectly designed. Sediment is removed and/or faci>ity is cleaned so that infiltration system works according to design. A sediment trapping area is installed to reduce seamen. transport into infiltration area A . . Storage area drains slowly (more than 43 hours) or overflows A soli texture test indicates faddy is not working at its designed capabilities or was incorrect!) designed. Additional vohrrme is added through excavation to provide needed storage. S is aerated and rototlled to improve drainage: Contact the Municipality for information on its requirements regarding excavation. M • ' , _ Sediment gypping area M'y sediment and debris filling area to 10% of depth from sump bottom to bottom of'outiet pipe or obstructing flow into the connector pipe. Clean out sump to design depth. • One Time Sediment trapping area not present Stormwater enters infiltration area directly without treatment Add a trapping area by constructing a sump for settling of solids. Segregate settling area from rest of locality. Contact the Municipality for guidance. M Rock filters . Sediment and debris , By visual inspection tittle or no water flows through fitter during heavy rain storms. Replace gravel in rock finer. • ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Infiltration Systems If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. • Comments: Key: A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S=After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) J - 21 ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Conveyance Systems (Pipes, Ditches, and Swales) Frequency Drainage System Feature / V Problem Conditions to Check For • Conditions That Should Ex t M,S _ - Pipes Sediment & debris Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. M Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through pipes. Ad vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. A Damaged (rusted. bent. or mod) Protective coating is damaged: rust is ausing more than 50% deterioration to any Para of pipe. • Pipe repaired or replaced. M • Any dent that nit sig rcatntiy impedes flow (Le., decreases the cross section area of pipe by more than 20%). Pipe repaired or replaced. • • M Pipe has major cracks or tears allowing groundwater leakage. Pipe repaired or replaced. M.S Open latches • Trash & debris • • Dumping of yard wastes such as grass edppings and branches into basin. Unsightly accumulation of nondegradable materials such as glass, plastic, metal, foam, and coated Pape Remove trash and debris and dispose as prescribed by the Municipality. M Sediment buildup Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth Ditch cleaned of all sediment and .,. debris so that it matches design. A • • Vegetation Vegetation (e.g., weedy shrubs or sapangs) that reduces free movements of water through ditches. Water flows freely through ditches. Grassy vegetation should be lett alone. M Erosion damage to slopes See Ponds Ct edd1st. See Ponds Checkfsst. A Rode fining out of place or missing (if applicable) Maintenance person can see native soil beneath the rock fining. Replace racks to design standard. Varies Catch basins See Catch Basins Checidst. See Catch Basins Checidast. M,S Swales Trash a debris See above for D@ches. See above for Ditches. M Sediment buildup See above for Ditches. Vegetation may need to be reptantec after cleaning. M • • • Vegetation not growing or • • Grass cover is sparse and seedy or areas are overgrown with woody vegetal . Aerate soils and reseed and mulct, bare areas. Maintain grass height a a minimum of 6 inches for becr stonrrvvatertreatment. Remove woody growth, recontour, and reseed as necessary. M.S • Erosion damage to slopes See Ponds Checldlst. See Ponds Checldacl. M Conversion by homeowner to incompatible use Swale has been filed in or blocked by shed, woodpile, shrubbery, etc. If possible, speak with homeowner and request that swale area be restored. Contact the Municipality to report problem if not rectified voluntarily. ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Conveyance Systems (Pipes, Ditches, and Swales) A • Swale does not drain water stands in swale or flow velocity is very slow. Stagnation occurs. A survey may be needed to check grades. Grades need to be in 1-5% range if possible. if grade is less than 1% underdrains may need to be installed. If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: K A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S =After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) J -26 GENERAL ITEMS Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Clear /Remove Brush by hand Acre $1,320.00 Clear /Grub/Tree Removal Acre 0, /O $6,820.00 , 8 z o° Common Excavation CY $1.30 Trench Excavation CY 53.30 Embankment - Backfill and compact with select material CY 54.00 Trench - Backfill and compact with select material CY 56.30 Borrow - Fill and compact CY 512.30 Gravel Base - Fill and compact CY 517.20 Topsoil - Imported CY $17.60 Grading - Fine with a grader SY $0.80 Grading - Fine by hand SY $1.45 Fence - Cedar, 6' high LF 527.50 Fence - Vinyl coated chain link, 6' high LF $11.00 Fence Gate Vinyl coated chain Zink, 20' wide EACH $990.00 Fence - Wildlife passable (NGPE & SAT) LF $5.50 Survey - Monuments EACH $110.00 Survey - Lot lines DAY 5693.00 Survey - Line and grade DAY / 5561.00 f 7 ' Trail - 4" crushed cinder SY $7.15 Trail - 4" crushed surfacing top course SY $6.60 Wall - Gabion, 3' thick, no earthwork SY $106.70 Wall - Retaining, with earthwork - SY $23.10 General Subtotal 1 243 °--`?: SalesTax @8.6% /06 ° GENERAL ITEMS TOTAL /, _74 y 9L.0 Approved Nov. 2002 W� — ?L Ft' CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department 206 - 433 -0179 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY TESC Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Fence - Silt (installation and removal) LF 2 00 $1.40 2 8 0 c Fenbe - Temporary, drip line & NGPE /SAT) LF $1.10 Hydroseeding ACRE 0 , (0 $1,980.00 / y ' ? 2 Hydroseeding, fertilizing, mulching ACRE $2750.00 Seeding - By hand SY $0.40 Mulch - Straw, 3" by hand SY $0.55 Mulch - Straw, 2" by machine ACRE $2200.00 $0.00 Fabric - Geotextile SY $1.65 Catch Basin Protection - Insert EACH $33.00 Catch Basin Protection - Geotextile a& rock EACH S22.00 Outfall - Silt trap or pond overflow EACH $660.00 I nterceptor dike /swale LF $1.00 Hay bale silt trap EACH $55.00 Brush Barrier LF S0.30 Stabilized construction entrance - 15' by 50' EACH $ 1,155.00 /J /SS` f Stabilized - construction entrance - 15' by 100' - EACH $1,980.00 Pipe slope drains LF S2.20 Level spreader LF Si 65 Silt Trap EACH 5550.00 Silt Pond EACH $1,65000 TESC Subtotal /, 6 33 c'O Sales Tax @ 8.6% / qe a 49 TESP TOTAL // 7 7 3 4€? J ... DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY Approved Nov. 2002 2 ROAD & PARKING IMPROVEMENTS Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals AC Grinding - 4' machine SY $7.70 AC Removal /Disposal /Repair SY $88.00 Curb - Extruded asphalt LF $2.20 Curb Extruded concrete -LF $2.20 Curb & Gutter - Vertical LF $7.70 Curb & Gutter - Demolish /Dispose LF $11.33 Sidewalk - Concrete - Demolish /Dispose SY $24.75 Sawcut - Asphalt, 3" deep LF S1.43 Sawcut - Concrete, per 1" depth over 3" LF S1.21 Sealant - Asphalt LF $0.77 Shoulder - CSTC TONS $ 16.50 Sidewalk - Concrete, 4" thick with 4" CSTC SY $22.00 Sidewalk - Concrete, 5" thick with 4" CSTC SY $26.40 Striping - 4" refiectorized LF $0.28 Striping - per parking stall EA $3.00 Thickened asphalt edge LF $5.17 Pavement Markings - Channelization arrows EACH $82.50 Signs - Traffic channelization EACH $55.00 Overlay - Asphalt concrete - (2.05 tons /CY) TONS $44.00 Pavement - Asphalt concrete, <300 tons (2.05 tons /CY) TONS 95 0 0 3, 9 7/ - Pavement - Asphalt concrete, >300 tons SY $35.20 Asphalt treated base (ATB) - (2.05 tons /CY) . TONS $38.50 CSTC - (1.85 tons /CY) TONS 8 n $ 16.50 /, 3 2 o ° - -" CSBC - (1.85 tons /CY) TONS 50 $16.50 1, 7 7o 6 2 Gravel base (1.85 tons /CY) TONS $9.90 Geotextile fabric - Structural S1.65 Guard rail LF S22 $0.00 Pavement markings - Raised, Type 1 EACH S3.30 Arrows - Thermoplastic EACH S82.50 Lane marking - Thermoplastic LF $3.30 Sign - Stop 30"x30", VIP grad EACH $82.50 Sign - Street name, Sr X length, 6" letters EACH $44.00 Signs - Miscellaneous traffic EACH $38.50 Median - Non - traversible, C curbing EACH $5.50 Barricade - Type III LF $33.00 Traffic signal - Fully actuated (includes design) EACH $220,000.00 Street light - City -owned EACH $5,500.00 Road & Parking Subtotal 8. // o Sales Tax @ 8.6% 740 sr ROAD & PARKING TOTAL 7, 3s Approved Nov. 2002 -f- 7 ' (o'-w cue, DA y 3 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY CSTC - Crushed surfacing top course • CSBC - Crushed surfacing base course . - DRAINAGE SYSTEM Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Inlet/Yard Drain Each S385.00 Catch Basin -Type I Each / 5935.00 4 3_5 Catch Basin -Type 2, 48" Each $1,430.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $352.00 Catch Basin - Type 2 54" Each $ 1,595.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $407.00 Catch Basin - Type 2, 60" Each $1,760.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $341.00 Catch Basin - Type 2, 72" Each $2,420.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $572.00 Cleanout, PVC, 4" dia. Each 2 - $94.60 /' 2 Cleanout, PVC, 6" dia. Each S126.50 Cleanout, PVC, 8" dia. Each S156.20 Drain pipe, PVC, 4" LF 2 c' $4.95 ? y o ° Drain pipe, PVC, 6" LF $7.15 Drain pipe, PVC, 8" LF $8.80 Storm pipe, Concrete, 8" LF $16.50 Storm pipe, Concrete, 12" LF $19.80 Storm pipe, PVC, 8" LF $8.80 Storm pipe, 'PVC, 12" LF S 16.50 Storm pipe, PVC, 15" LF $20.90 Storm pipe; PVC, 18" LF $25.30 Storm pipe, PVC, 24" LF $33.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 8" LF $11.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 12" LF $ 16.50 Storm pipe, CMP, 15" LF $20.90 Storm pipe, CMP, 18" LF $24.20 Storm pipe, CMP, 24" LF $33.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 30" LF $42.90 Storm pipe, CMP, 36" _ LF $71.50 Storm pipe, CMP, 42" LF $88.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 48" LF $93.50 Storm pipe, CMP, 60" LF $137.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 15" LF $25.30 Storm pipe, RCP, 18" LF $30.80 Storm pipe, RCP, 24" LF $44.00 Storm pipe, RCP, 30" LF $71.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 36" LF $93.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 42" LF $115.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 48" LF $126.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 60" LF $181.50 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY Approved Nov. 2002 . e Approved Nov. 2002 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY a a `) Pond Overflow Spillway SY $8.80 Restrictor - OWS, 12" Each $880.00 Restrictor - OWS, 15" Each $990.00 Restrictor - OWS, 18" Each S1,155.00 Restrictor - OWS, 24" Each $1,430.00 Trash rack, 15" Each $203.50 Trash rack, 18" Each $231.00 Trash rack, 21" Each $264.00 Trash rack, 24" Each $330.00 Riprap, Light, Loose Tons $(56.00 Quarry Spoils, 4" to 8" Tons $49.50 Trench - Infiltration, per 100 feet Feet Perforated stub -out system Each Trench - Flow dispersal, per 100 feet Feet Sign - Stormwater Facility Each $330.00 Drainage System Subtotal � q/¢ 0 _5' State Sales Tax 3 • 6 2- DRAINAGE SYSTEM TOTAL 4, 71 6 z . e Approved Nov. 2002 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY a a `) WATER SYSTEM Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Water Main - Ductile iron, CL 52, 6" LF Water Main - Ductile Iron, CL 52, 8" LF Water Main - Ductile iron, CL 52, 10" LF Water Main - Ductile Iron, CL 52, 12" LF Gate Valve, 6" EACH Gate Valve, 8" EACH Gate Valve, 10" EACH Gate Valve, 12" EACH Fire Hydrant Assembly, With guard posts EACH $1,200.00 Fire Hydrant Assembly, Without guard posts EACH S950.00 Air -Vac, 8" EACH Air -Vac, 10" EACH Air -Vac, 12" EACH PRVA, 8" EACH PRVA, 10". • EACH PRVA, 12" EACH Water System Subtotal D Sales Tax © 8.6% o WATER SYSTEM TOTAL DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY 6 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY 7 SEWER SYSTEM Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals SSS, PVC 4" LF $5.50 SSS, PVC 6" IF /G o $8.25 52-5 SSS, PVC 8" LF $11.00 Sewer pipe, PVC "'' a -I LF 25 2 C. !° Sewer pipe, PVC, 12" LF $333 / Sewer pipe, PVC, " LF $0.00 Manhole, 48" EACH ' $1,430.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $352.00 Manhole, 54" EACH $1,595.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $407.00 Manhole, 60" EACH $1,760.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $451.00 Manhole, 72" EACH $2,530.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $572.00 Sewer System Subtotal 2, 75 d Soles Tax @ 8.6% Zei8's 2' . , - SEWER SYSTEM TOTAL 3, (3sez DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY 7 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES • TOTALS 1. GENERAL ITEMS 7, 347 y 9 2. EROSION PREVENTION /SEDIMENT CONTROL (TESC) /, 773 ' 3. ROAD AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS 3"1 f 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM 4f 7 y j e 5. WATER SYSTEM p 6. SEWER SYSTEM 3. /3 -re - GRAND TOTAL 2a 4o 4 5 :1".:- 150% Bond Quantity = (1.5)(GRAND TOTAL) .7 G G 6 €f The quantities above were calculated by: Printed Name: .er e S /rr,Q e li. r, - , R.e Signature: 7,-J--%. _ /4" r PE License Number: 7' /l6r7 Firm Name and Address: /12gs --- 9 y!" /4.e-7, S. 7 .ee 4✓ /4At 1 Y8 /6 b' j Date: q' /j/v 'd4' . Telephone Number: (/ 0 6) 2 — 7‘ Fax Number: 5 i 1 ,., E-mail : - _ DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY 8 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P-SS Planner: cccf -- o X File Number: Lot - Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: (•' Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers:pg A'. z'2 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tukplan a,ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: ‘afi`-71-/, shp-� ?la LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. /e S9 ' ti Ave_ w4. 98/68 p1ec 3597000083 Quarter: // Section: 23 Township: 2.3 Range: y (This information may be found on your tax statement.) SHOR*c , PLATtik v4Q ( p `1 _Sg'y 6 408 A� 4 L itic/i &DK 65/x{8 S /4A DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: l i A UCk tddfz1 &- - Address: 57/5 5 V' / sr -7 W.ZL.4, i '4 .. 98/6.8 Phone: 020 G - a c ( 4 1 - 3 -3 8/ FAX: E -mail: GhQs Lou L. cheer v/. corn Signature: �/,1�� Date: /I - /Z G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE. APP\SHTPLTPT. doc. 09/11/03 EXECUTED at Tt✓ KW t !4 On this day personally appeared before me executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged purposes mentioned therein. -. . SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS $A tt �t t CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its emplo ees, a �en ts, sn gineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 73 "IL 9 A v - e S. Tolru 981M for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion, cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. (city), W4 (state), on AJO1e? l &R 72 ,200 4 g u Chocks Wetzler (Print N72716.... s 7 s 19701 5 T 9 8103 (Address) c -O 6 a pi 6 I (Phone (Signature) e...174." >° S W Tier to me known to be the individual who h signed the same i er voluntary act and deed for the uses and My Commission expires on /0 g4MY OF , 20 LFf"' Y PUBLIC in d for th State of Washington at p .v, rrf ., /0 — Check items submitted with application . Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning iiWC CIV APPLICATION MATERIALS: V 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. D4`447/1 20/4 1.- 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (4 copies). M FHl S•••"" 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11 ". 4. Application Fee — up to 4 lots in LDR $500, other zones $1,000 -- 5 to 9 lots in all zones $1,000 OA 5. SEPA Environmental Checklist (for 5 -9 lots, cut/fill over 500 cubic yards see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: N,4 6. If the project requires SEPA review or involves a short plat of 5 —9 lots: a 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see SEPA Application). OA 7. If the project involves a short plat of 5 —9 lots: One (1) set of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings —e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks —must be included (see SEPA Application) Op( 8. If the project involves a short plat of 5 — 9 lots: King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: v 10. Vicinity Map with site location. 11. Title Report: Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and encumbrances, must be dated within 45 days of application filing. ;.)h 12. Document sewer and water availability if provided by other than the City of Tukwila. ✓ 13. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria (see Application). 14. Any required maintenance agreements, easements or other documents ready for recording. 15. Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis per King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). For additional guidance contact Public Works. 16. Provide sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45) for example wetland or geotechnical reports. `/ 17. Printed computer plat closure or demonstrated mathematical plat closure on all lots, streets, alleys and boundaries. Allowable error of closure shall not exceed one foot in 5,000 feet. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). C: Nora FilaVted Book\SHTPLTAPP.doc. 01 /10/03 fr it,e4A-421e_zdS 1 T a z • • 'Check items submitted with application= Information Required :ay be waived in unusual cases, upon app..,„ al of both Public o rk. . and Planning < .. NQ PLAT SURVEY: a template is available from the City in AutoCAD format c - I f) ' O oM l 18 (a) The plat survey must include the name of the plat, graphic scale, space f o r the C t 4 i>) Tukwila file number and north arrow. It shall be drawn with black ink in record of survey M 4'+ format and include the elements listed at TMC 17.04.060 A. This shall be stamped by the surveyor. ' v (b) Legal descriptions of the existing and proposed lots. v (c) The final plat documents must include all applicable certificates and approvals listed in the "Certificates and Approvals" section of this application (TMC 17.04.060). Sections for the surveyor and owner(s) must be signed prior to submittal. v (d) Existing and proposed lot lines shall be shown solid with new lines called out and lot lines to be removed shall be shown dashed. v (e) Lot and block numbers shall begin with the number one (1) and be numbered consecutively without omission or duplication. v (f) Total lot or parcel sizes and average width of each proposed lot (min 50 ft. for residential). (g) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. (h) Fire access lanes and turn- arounds per Fire Department standards. L. (i) Location of all tracts to be dedicated to any public or private purpose shall be distinguished from lots intended for general development with notes stating their purpose and limitations. ✓ (j) Locations of existing and proposed public street rights -of -way and private access easements. v (k) Location, dimension and purpose of existing and proposed easements. Provide recorded documents which identify the nature and extent of existing easements! - � ,7 1 e,{ 5 , M. LANDSCAPE PLAN: for 5-9 lot short plats pvle C°r .t A.,.2 C%-riareVita i■ 19 (a) Landscape planting plan stamped and signed by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. Plan must include at least one tree in the front yard of each lot and meet Public Works standards (TMC 17.20.030 G). Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: 11A- 20 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g, streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. j (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. (d) Show proposed lot and tract lines. ,CIVIL PLANS: ' 21. (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". 4 (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals (minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line). C:Won's Fdes\Rcd Book1SHTPLTAPP.doc.01 /10/03 Check items submitted with application Information Required. r a'ay be waived in unusual cases, upon approval o f both Public WP R) l and Planning 1 01/ 1 6 AQ 4 Total existing lots prior to Short Plat. �� (d) Total expected cut and fill for plat buildout. O J Total lots in this Short Plat. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. v (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the KCSWDM. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. 4 (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. 9 J (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. J (i) Plan, profile and cross - section for any right -of -way improvements. ■., (j) Show planned access to lots, driveways, fire access lanes and turn - arounds. (k) Show the location and .distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures, indicating those to be removed. Show the expected location of all new buildings. (1) Show proposed lot and tract lines. Information Required. Response Total existing lots prior to Short Plat. Ong-, Total lots in this Short Plat. ► t Total acres involved in the Short Plat. L 1 qtuft.. Constraints (sensitive area, right of way, retention/detention areas) in acres or sf. att, CLAit t 57G ¢ fir 9 Any preexisting uses? .J sr (0 Overall density (lots/acre). 1...1)(2— GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REQUIRED INFORMATION C: Noraz Fks Red Book\SHfPLTAPP.doc, 01/10/03 ESRI ArcExplorer 2.0 Map Title WI t i t • ..°., ,t i n �4 1 .� :. I� t � c °1�1�a i� ����li1��34'v;.� �k1�rlik, �r-� r , fl itlrjJ�d,pyi „111;' ;iGy���ll�t ,r,��� , 11 k1' 4 11 r; TM ti I +1' �iiillltis!� 1 i 1 ��;i'�ti' I , i ►11:,'� �'�IIIIMr,�`. ri lair t, ►„ u; , , II �.r� ,'��`����111'I'�1��I►�i�i`� I,lL4,`ti7r��1 �1 1 � � 'i1 � t , � � _ ��1 11•rf 1 (rrrtrs � lltitr t L �—� �* �•. �'s � �� � t l�.1 t1U1>ti�ittR! 1llilbi crack, f iA, I it 11y �� ti� 1� 1�i LA iiti twi ret � I �, �tid' � •'1�� + OLIO lily �jlt 4144 I'� (7.� ■ t1 Y15 } 1.9 ��LIO 4► yr I ; rrl�rllL,. ,. . . h; ., � :► t i F 1 1»n 4,% it " io (lrr t ii .r. ,, , IA .k f a , ak- .. \ \`rsl�llti }rf �t1!/►,�� : . � ti .; `, { `", � ` +i4 u4nn 4 4 , ` J u`' SL 1` 1 4 i 7p, 14 jl ( ? v _ Diis ummittl }�114"1114� ;t�'mar.. NbErfll�4t 4li .11 !��I� i� l � t �.. MI P ��� o- �� 11 I I 4 f I I ,41_4;_l_____._:_ JI T j 3 i , IIII I r , ..�� ,t�. ►. l /riiij li t..� RAI .w 11 t ,� �' 4 fi t — c' i ' S ■ . . . , , e. ST" .1 11111 I I itia! IL art 1)1Paffit 1)1 illl Oil li F:► ° te - k'1/4 1 �i r ,A1 +Loa"; . . 4.4 ai ',L_ 45:so.' ,..„„,„, ,))1ijrilliedilt„---;1,1,mi , 7 v - -- ,- -- ,1 .:svA";;( - 6114.4 , -. - . , .,t.‘. ti, .1 I ■ P."' parc12_03 /N/ 2' Contours /N/ streets City Limits Water Bodies Wednesday, Dec 22 2004 50' X 147' 4" 7366 SQ FT X20' x 135' 4" easment not counted as SQ FT for any lot. i 80'X85' 1 6800 SQ FT! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i • 200' •• 4- 50' 4" —� • • Immi •.. 4 • • 1 - • • 6614 SQ FT ; • •.•• 1 r w. r ••• - au 1) 4 -- 52' 8" --* 1 ww w n..i. w 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 6t14SQFT1 1 1 L . r S p' f `1' 011 4) I OC O/1 I 1 SPlY`E_ 4 — Le - c..4" `cJJr i j ne�5b. sc) I c � S ew TAG /8. ° /Wm C • BEYe1lbl OA1%I rot an or unm.A 110061003 aim s -.-- r = EM. OMAR R W. • MAN air MR . la . ITAlaMw !R .% sown OF WTI 5e1Q7 r DMA= Q ana..rw AVE elrne eEVATUI • 313$ FEU lMy -¢'Ol ..a ® ®eelw 1 noacaeraLamc>,mLalnAna _ r d yrarraa.a..acrrrrrr • �r ■■•••++■■■••■••■• • pao.raaar s0•srv10rr+rsr .11:r ► a . �irrsla ao..ar.e a.ar.r•wYa.�arara! Yrttraeli YaaaHr.arrbr�,la•Yi.ar ZQa ■ ZQa rrr..eoen.�roran.rrrrarr.ar+ w•a , f` 1 . ^ • • I \ 't'9 7,12as awericaz • 1021! I evaoaravamaarro.s.00ps 6SfeOO Popoa .aaaaooa..awa.a.aa...raymolmia .a.+aaawaa.a - . ®.dr.rrepaabr.rwr..awaaa+rr areadpolaar •• w aw Yral.lolorlawa•• Souls owomoo. — rryYr.W rlbmoseairi■b.a.o F ier • �VosIlM od. r. way o .+� � fl1 R 141[1 • 21t lot s el6!! AG' L am• /a .0 EA sofa ffibzr 1. WY aliraaay Ism rr mirth trrsrriilada 2 lrtil.l0iw gas. e brielr[fa Ytoilrrds iodopma.ib a.iwdprdahiOc1 eres erarwie.lmrL hpab'1- l3•+31• 3. Sri 10,4011.1141 holesirl ab.aYear *aim alsomi arc i.4Mlowrawolrlot • Thy WWI=Imei briatrrw aaiii.ibir aMirieatdfrrLarsilliroMili 1otOlEafa !. tEria *Ilk shod eelio.ielr Lai l 3011d2 y7 arirri eI*wok= adr 1.312 9liat7y7 isi}r LAOS Llapaaaaoea. L! l LPdry7swim WO ePiyrYsarfa. 6 nig west WIS.. dlmiEwtr Ike Ammo. .ilaYioei6asPVC witfaaa ir amnia .iic}rbar.e O dap scri who o iaolaliar .Waooeiaare.lipa.i.iml . 7.1YrtYa boy aoi.iaOoamid scarbslodcabala lwra.awY car +bww•r ■••••••••••• a� rr aa�r ir+r�a�.�a rrrar •■••■a. aaiaaraa.s••• aartir.al..r�tla w.a air 1aaw.....aorr.a so.sr arzr.wa 1 o IM r 2W R 1 —. /P 7J .eesoir W —/r — f so j a h. 20060717900001 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. L04 -077 DECLARATION Know all men by these presents that we, the undersigned. owner(s) in fee simple of the and herein described do hereby make a SHORT PLAT. The undersigned further declare this SHORT PLAT to be a graphic representation of said SHORT PLAT of soid and same is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF we et our hands and seals. State of Washington County of ft On this day personally appeared be fore me 010,21.1" -1A-1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand a seal this day of u I - • '-ae_ Signature gAS6 1�__ Nome as commissioned tff7Ct fLt PLae1 t'r T t / I k,fir rt My appointment' expires 1.n • /t -r' p �t1 0E o ff ;yG -tilt? OT,� r Cflf " m:m " 418 L I C Stott �s, 'V4bs ' Countjr4ASN�N,�si On this day personally appeared be fore me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the he /she signed the some as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand a seal this doy of Signature Name as commissioned Title My appointment expires RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for �reecord this. in book. - O�...of..1- page... '.4.at the request of RrcA Se4..0e7`er, La.el ✓rye7.� APPROVALS: Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this f day Chairman, Short Subdivision Committee OLD LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF' PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EAST UNE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AT A POINT 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EAST LINE WITH THE ADJUDICATED LINE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF 'THE AFORESAID ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH 150 FEET; THENCE EAST 200 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE: THENCE NORTH 150 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST UNE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE WEST 200 FEET ON A UNE PARALLEL.WITH AND 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE AFORESAID ADJUDICATED LINE TO. THE' POINT OF BEGINNING. NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Assessor LOT 1 THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF' 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE ADJUDICATED UNE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE. 70.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING. SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST. ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 85.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'08'07" EAST, ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST UNE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST 85.00 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE TO THE TRUE ?POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT 2 THAT PORTION Or THE INTERURBAN ADDITION '0 SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF' 5} TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE ADJUDICATED LINE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND . 5 OF' SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE. 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 85.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ON A UNE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF 59Th AVENUE SOUTH, 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE 115.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37'52'29" WEST 102.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'08'07" EAST, ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 50.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT 3 . THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST UNE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE ADJUDICATED LINE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01 WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 147.24 TO THE. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST 52.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, PARALLEL WITH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 150.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 37'52'29" WEST 102.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'08'027 EAST, PARALLEL WITH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 11.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'08'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, g c hs,'e •-• e er , registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that thi.; plat is based on an actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown thereon correctly, and that monuments other than those monuments approved for settin at o later dote, have been set and lot tae o e ground as Examined and approved this . Deputy Assessor Account Number 3597006083 SURVEY FOR: day of 9L 20. Dianna Devlin & Chuck Wetzler P.O. Box 68148 Seattle, WA Z 60 / PORTION OF _SW 1/4 of NE _1/4, S. 23 _ T 23 N., R. 4 _E., W.M. NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS CONTINUED LOT 4 THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST UNE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE ADJUDICATED UNE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 20.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ALONG THE SAID EAST UNE, 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED UNE, 147.24 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'08'07" EAST, PARALLEL WTH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED UNE, 147.24 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTIUTIES EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF' PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST UNE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE ADJUDICATED UNE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE. 70.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED UNE, 135.33; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, PARALLEL WTH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST, PARALLEL WTH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 135.33 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID 59TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 01'08'07" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST UNE. 20.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF' BEGINNING, STORM DRAINAGE, FIRE ACCESS AND HAMMERHEAD EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE ADJUDICATED UNE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE. 70.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'02" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 135.33; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, PARALLEL WITH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED • LINE, 20.39 FEET TO POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 31.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'08'07" WEST, PARALLEL WITH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 50.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 20.00 FEET THENCE NORTH 01'08'07" EAST, PARALLEL WITH 59TH AVENUE SOUTH, 49.95 FEET, TO A POINT OF' CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A •RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN .ARC OF' 31.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'02" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE, 54.95 FEET-.TO THE EAST LINE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 01'08'07" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE 20.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF' BEGINNING. 10 FOOT SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT THE SOUTH 10 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL' THAT PORTION OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED' IN VOLUME 10 OF' PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EAST LINE OF 59TH AVENUE SOUTH AT A POINT 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE :INTERSECTION OF' SAID EAST LINE WITH THE ADJUDICATED UNE BETWEEN TRACTS 4 AND 5-OF THE AFORESAID ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF • 59T1-1 AVENUE SOUTH 150 FEET; THENCE EAST 200 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID ADJUDICATED LINE; THENCE NORTH 150 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF' 59TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE WEST 200 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE AFORESAID ADJUDICATED LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SCHROETEROLAND SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS PA. Box 813, Seahurst, Washington 98062 (206) 242 -6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 OWN. BY LAW CHKD. BY Revised 6/27/06 off 038 DATE 7/21/04 DATE FIELD 7/2/ SCALE JOB NO. 448/17 PROJECT NO. 04075 SHEET 1 OF 2 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. L04 -077 Existing fire 20' Hydrant'', set nail in asphalt TPOB Lot 4 TPOB Lot 1 -C . LC) set nail in asphalt Mgr, 0 CO 0 0 z in / book / of POB Descriptions Line between Lots 4 and 5 ; ROS 59/201 per S.C. #129565 Ref. ROS 87/68 I, City of Tukwila Retrocement and Monumentation survey by Hill, Ingmon, _ __ —__ —__ chose & Co. Jon. 21, 1971 recorded under Recording No. 7112290409. ° gate post at wood fence is 0.5' south LOT 4 L ss 20' Ingress, Egress Id and utilities easement o (See Detail) 0 0 LOT 1 147. 85.00' N89'01'02 "W TP08 Easement - --_ —_ - n —L- 85.00' _ t� 3' wood fence 20' O NOTES: set nail in asphalt RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE .... filed for record this d• • 20 at M page ......,,at the request of L�+.1L�✓t fov Supt. of Records 589'01'02 "E / 147,24' • • 0 0 0 24' Existing House #14734 50.33' NO1'08'07 "E 20.00' 1 0 0 d I Turnaround and i O , access for Fire Dept`.. N89'01'02 "W 10' sewer & storm wood fence drainage ea .iement old is 1,1' north & 2.1' east 20'. of set rebor w /cop TPOB Lot 2 � I (Does not affect I Lot Areas) LOT 2 6.4' In te 115.0 0 0 0 0 N k -6' wood fence fence is 1.3' north 52.76' REFERENCES ROS 149/78 ROS 128/115 ROS 14/255 I .. ROS 87/68 ( 11.91' S89'01'02 "E TPOB Lot 3 A dd'tiOn f o fence is 1.1' north • Se_ f f o 55 1. All utilities shall be placed underground pursuant to the City of Tukwila underground ordinance. 2. A 20 foot wide paved access rood with on all weather surface shall be provided to all new structures and shall be built to the City of Tukwila Public Works and Fire Deportment standards. There shall be no parking allowed on the access road. A fire turnaround will be required if the access road exceeds 150 feet in Iength.This requirement must be met prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. There must be a fire hydrant within 250 feet of all building sites. If the fire . hydrant is not capable of a 1000 gallon per minute flow the future houses will be required to provide interior sprinklers, to be approved by the Fire Department. This requirement must be met prior to issuance of any building permits for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, LA AID SU,RWEIYORf S CERTIFICATE I ' /i cha'"rt vb registered as a that land this surveyor by the State of Washington, certify plot is based C on on actual C C survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown thereon correctly and that monuments other than those monuments approved for setting' o}ja,later date, have been set and lot `r�ked/o ground as depicted on the plat. Ji THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE ACCURACY STANDARDS OF WAC 332 -130 -090. hog wire fence is 1.3' east of set rebar w /cap (5 250' arc drawn from center existing fire hydrant old wood fence is 1.8' north & 0.5' east of set rcoor w /cap South 149th Street — ---- --- — 651.25' (ROS 87/68) N88'19'47 "E calc. SURVEY FOR: Dianna. Devlin & Chuck Wetzler P.O. Box 68148 Seattle, WA RECORDING. NO. 200607 7 900do / SCALE: t. Inch - 30' ft. PORTION OF _ SW 1/4 of NE _1/4, S. 23 _ LOT AREAS 1 10' sewer & storm drainage easement DETAIL: ACCESS EASEMENT, FIRE DEPT. ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENTS Scale: 1 " =30' LOT 1 (W /O Easement) = 6,800 S.F. LOT 1 (including Easement) = 8,500 S.F. 1,10° LOT 2 (W /O Easement) = 6,61J S.F. LOT 2 (including Easement) = Z620 S.F. LOT 3 = 6,518 S,F. LOT 4 = 7,.362 S.F. LOT 4 589'01'02 "E 135.33' ° = - r - fs. O 0 0 '\ 20' Ingress, Egress ` 0 and utilities easement P N - - -- Ca135.33 w `•_ 4.95' R: b - N89'01'02 "W ?p 7 y 1 ; � • 00 20.39' h O " /nom q; LOT1 W ' + ' W LOr2 Turnaround and a In I i o ca access for Fire Dept. v I d °. (Does not • affect zz 1 'n ° Lot Areas) I z i 1 t •'' 20 QQ j S89'01'02 "E OWN. BY LAW CHKD. BY Revised 6/28/06 111111 I I LOT ,3 Found 2" brass disk w /punch mark in conc. in case - Int. 62nd Ave. So. & So. 149th St. 7/1/04 1 N01'21'40 "E Basis, of Bearing 681.56' meas. 681.49' calc. Found 2" brass disk w /punch mark in conc. in case - Int. 62nd Ave. So. & So. 151st St. 7/1/04 SCHROETEReLAND SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 813, Seahurst, Voshington 98062 (206) 242-6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 DATE 7/21/04 DATE FIELD 7 / SCALE 1" =30' VOL. /PAGE ‘20 S 30' 60' 3_ N., R. _ SHEET 2 OF W.M. a U JOB : PROJECT NO. N404.80/410775 N 0 b v Q e I\ to to N A P a 1 1 JOB NO OA C2 DESIGN: SSM DRAWN: 5'SM MVO: DATE: Z7.fEP. G4 SCALE: /"' ZD' REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPD Site Improvement Plan 4-Lot Residential Short Plat 14734 59th Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 NE23- T23N -R4E, W.M. CLIENT: Dianna Devin and Chuck Wetzler P.O. Box 68148 Seattle, WA 98188 (208) 244-5381 Bruce S. MacVeigh, RE.— Civil Engineer 14245 59th Arcane South Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206)242.7665 FAX: Same - calftrst, GUT /N 7i7P W/ RD NIAC SZEE1/6 t- CO 4,Pt /N6 6+2I 6 "nr 2,F/1 6 • XIS 2 ./8 . rMN 14.4"J d'66 C/L S9L A1/6F.S df /d EX.B "SS 64.2.1 -P/W L /NE AOS (ASTM D4751) . .- 30400 slut else (0.80.0.16 mm) for slit 0bn 10400 slaw else (0.30.0.15 mm) for other labia Water Pemsavihy (ASTM D4401) I 0.32 tech minimum Grab Tensile Strength )ASTM 04832) I 710 be roes to want strength fabric 100 bs mss for standard etrengtt tabdo • Grab Termite Elogebon(ASrs 04832) Sox roes .UN5Ndet masmnce (AVM 04356) 70%min A • V ELEVATION DATUM PER CITY OF TUKWILA BENCHMARK #003 CHISELED SQUARE ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CONCRETE BASE OF LIGHT STANDARD 50; -1/ -SOUTH OF 144TH STREET. ON EAST. SIDE OF INTERURBAN AVE. SOUTH: ELEVATION 23.34 FEET (NVD'B8J ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 10' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE • Purpose • Rack construction entrances help prevent steepen of sediment away from the site on tin tires or undercarriages of vehicles Application W so Rock construction entrances shall be provided a oanceways to a cleared comoueden site from a private a public road Design Specifications m Rock pads a normally l2 fees 30 fen and 1 foot deep: however. for area site projects, the pad may be reduced to 12 feet by 25 feet (sat Rpm C3.A. p•029), ones approved by the DDES Inspector. pt ovidsd no sediment 4 bawls the site. Rocks used fa pad communion w11) be 4 to 6 inches in taxman. te Oeotbae" must be placed beneath the rack to prevent fine sediments from Ming `pumped" up through the rock by heavy vehicles. All vehicles museum Om rock pad to Law the site. ZO' Maintenance ns Couuceen enaaooffence. mutt be ivapecttdsepLdy, and rock mare be mplace u d weeded \ ry NEW STREET UGHT WITH TOWN AND COUNTRY' TYPE see 0 11W.' s •'.err. s :r '' L`�� /G LF ZOPS` P / Y. zo),s __'�� !,.P,IVs=r2=1=1=14W.. AMM, //.9/' R/M s / 9E.0 /E6"1792 = /71. NEW F:14. NEW W4 7E.e 54=2 V/I S t". W/ 3%4 M67E.es ELEC.'TCL, CATV r- ` o e0/1 / NLef/ MdN TR CLGIC. APAZA X.) R/ m /9.4.5 / , f3)c /94.1 /.E 8 " (SEJ = /94./ w <.r AIATRVEX. ) 0023 (/7'R7. NEW 0e- TYPE / A /A/:/7e. /Ge•(NW) /94.26 sir4P S /TE TEM (N✓D'8G3 CONCRETE POLE. SPECIFIC LOCATION AND INSTALLATION NEW e.e TYPE I REQUIREMENTS TO BE COORDINATED WITH PUGET SOUND R/ _ 7[' ENERGY AND CITY OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO ACTUAL - (.NA 0 EY INSTALLATON. /E MA7(N Ex: /.E. ) /E 6" = /8%8 25' Length may be modeled by DOES Inspector as warrant. ate conditions want. • Lit (U7 /NSC 7AP L4V NG EVE+ ( /E8 "e- /84.771) Al V SILT FENCING • Purpose • set fencing retches sediment that has beep mobilised by water flowing over are sits. Fabric used in the const5Won of silt f has openings specifically shed to allow water to flow through while )wining • the mryodty of panicle sires . . 2O Application • Silt fencing sbaa be used to protect can the perimeter of the site. o be placed parallel to topographic contours Sib fencing is suitable for placement in drasape channels or for other coaceooeood flows • Design Specifications N shown In Figure C.3.5 (p. C-30), silt fence must be towed-In to a shallow trench. and Wen nuked and nadaud 00 facc0ou properly. The silt foam which can be laud a N n a n teenycons0000 supply stores. mist se the following standard specifications: SriPOP0Z• E 1t SILT FENCE INSTAL I•m INSTALLATION A MAINTENANCE Reinforce _11Z 21' G *• 7EL, ELEC. 0.07 , lass S N df•0POZ"W_ _NEW G$s 3 e +84 ty NEW CZ- TYPE RM /95-.2 / - W /4" TEE • / a /Eli" !NJ = / 72. u ND S-C-D RA IN :.SKig1t BE 6 "PVc 2 d•415'A.c. b • JEZELT•BALlAST PROOi•.PDLL E.G 341E Maintain and con X�. • x ZS• p"..-Lv . E06L L//RB D.0. /I/EYYA SET7,6'/Y (ag 11if.ftRb "DEPT FMRRAfuS OWv ou Ea CI E "(Yoe IOK3 $54V NE% IV BE Bf.EFEOuP. ( 1FL SZ. 74. ' S7012M AND SAN /7342Y SEWEC /92 / . - EASEMENT � /NF /L7RAT /0 N TRENeN 20' W X ZS' L x D , e '' A ES1DENTIAL DRAINAGE NOTE FOR LOTS 1. AND 3' 1. Soils on site are sandy )cants and are suitable for stotmwater infiltration. 2. Each lot will have its own stormwater infiltration system, collecting runoff from individual roof areas. Each system will be designed per criteria in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, Appendix "C" (Small Site Criteria). 3. Each lot's system will be located on its own lot unless drainage easements are used allowing placement on another lot. 4 • The infiltration trench size and location for the new residence on each lot will be based ' on the size and layout of future houses at the time of building permit application. 5. Trenches will be sized at the following rates - Lot 1 20 LF of 2' by 2' trench per 1,000 SF impervious surface. Lot 2 9 LF of 2' by 2' trench per 1,000 SF impervious surface. Lot 3 9 LF of 2' by 2' trench per 1,000 SF impervious surface. 6. Piping around buildings collecting water from downspouts will be 4 inch diameter PVC at 1% minimum unless otherwise specified. Cleanouts will be provided at all 90 degree bends unless a downspout is near which may be used for pipe cleaning and inspection. 7. Foundation footing drains will not be combined with perimeter downspout collection lines. �x -- - +r,36 D t l ecvs.e. o.P.Q, new G8 Z02 J AL N t hS ()if, Z 20 0 /B 007 '04 s D W 4 //v✓ '0.4 c vll V"' 21. /749.5 • es SEE SEWER PROF /L E e SHEET L'/Z. i06- /7t- 'x • - !..7.5c, r 2dd - /94 / 72. - Infiltration trench »••�_ • WSY 4• rigid or 8' flexible perforated pipe PLAN VIEW NTS 4• rigid or 6' flexible perforated pipe Overflow apteN block sump w/.olid Id not drain .PETA /AVMS W4LL 0 +00 TYPICAL DOWNSPOUTINFILTRATTON SYSTEM /PerlE Jai 7) I TPRNAROdWD P.PDE /L -E N / ". 20' V /,' r 2' PEW C(3 ( /9'RT� • 01ZZ 68 ,770.E / .E //'4 / 98.•7 /EB"MNWJ a /7L.24 11 -1 . 0.0 t .... .......A_ »a° q•_._.• •_ • are mesh acreen PROFILE VIEW NTS b • • wesMd rock ea pe �.� C/L ECE✓'S • NA: PEE - b PA✓EHEN SECTION A � '\ . •v 1 7/V..X4 72ENCSd .(SEE PLAN V/L'W> tA •.e.0 Y. '-T „ ta. 8.:'3 7. N07: .c /ELG 00N74 (AR ROO 6Rq°L TO /NA 7 !, CONTROL PO /NT FLEWS. P.PI!/ATF DR IVE PRD F/L E .4 /"= 26 . V / " = Z' oil/water eepanmr CB sump whoW 54 compacted hacldll 4" rigid orb Usti* --L,11.4.1.6011.9 • a.doaed pipe - ' • DCaSFI' T Iku.DL F(.EX PIPE - 202 - 200 - /7B - /7G - / 9 4 5I DET/1L YOU /S, (^ TNECB /tND TEE A INECTEO l _NpB,�O /A) LO - / 2 / + fee d+ a .yw - 202 - 200 C 50 a o en P ti 04,1'4 a e � a� 0 ..FO DO z u 4 N w z z Z LO w O W 0 CC ROAD Ys• e['0.' r P.r kloc. TED LtAtL MATW- 'SEC'T /ON • ° -ed •• /+00 ci-f 2