Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L99-0007 - SEGALE BUSINESS PARK #981 - DESIGN REVIEWL99 -0007 SEGALE BUSINESS PARK BUILDING 5801 THRU 6199 Segale Park Building 981 (DESIGN REVIEW) City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: December 5, 2000 APPLICANT: Mark Hancock, for Segale Business Park RE: D2000 -318, Segale Building 93IA ADDRESS: 6101 S. 180th Street The following are the conditions of approval for building permit D2000 -318. Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 -431 -3661 if there are any questions. 1. The architectural paving called out on Sheet L 1 will include either exposed aggregate and/or a broom finish with saw cut pattern. The architectural paving pattern design shall be reviewed and approved by DCD staff prior to the pouring of the concrete. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the construction of the wall on the west screening the generators, the design of the gate must be reviewed and approved by DCD staff. The number of parking stalls provided both on- and off -site meet the required number of parking stalls for warehouse usage (65). If office space is added in the future, then a parking study must be prepared to identify the actual number of parking stalls needed for this type of use (internet facility). cc: File: L2000 -060 c:\ mydocs\ genera1\2000memos \d2000- 318.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 z w`. re 2 00 co cnw, w z: Jam. wp gI J- I _; Z o: uj O N: w w' LI z U=': OH z INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100,ITukwila, WA 98188 c — i_ ?11(3 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project: LYFdti C).. i Type of Inspection: PIcti■Att1nG1 lLCfGYtiGS -I,P r-t„ ( Address: • 1 57 iUt 5e,c.4.1..L • ti'avC. 1)/ G Date called: t t 1.a.)/ )-?. Special instructions: • Date wanted: t 2 ! A4 1 00 a,m,.) p.m. Requester: :{ e,Lr'. 1‘t ;'. (ssi\-7, . Phone: • 5 '_I -- 5 :5' Y Approved per applicable codes. n Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: tiC WJ.1 Lkc. t, V '% Inspector: Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: J Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila • AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION /, lximi la. -t vi 1(e___ HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Name „/ Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance 1 _Project Prgject Number: Board of.Adjustment Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board. of Appeals Agenda Pkt . Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda • Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Cl assi fieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box. 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other rne...10., a.: ,e, 40 O99 -0003 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 9 {'day of 1p in the Year 2000 . P:GINAWYNETTA/ FORMS /AFFIDAVIT- MAIL01/24/0011:44 AM • Name „/ 1(9a/Le it,§ -a_4_, • _Project Prgject Number: I9 .-coos Mailer's Signature: ik n �� k Ij Y P:GINAWYNETTA/ FORMS /AFFIDAVIT- MAIL01/24/0011:44 AM City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM February 23, 2000 TO: Interested Parties Steve Lancaster, Director FM: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director and SEPA Responsible Official RE: Addendum to E99 -0003: Segale Warehouse, Building 981 SEPA; Design Review File L99 -0007, Segale Building No. 981; and L99 -0006 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit: Minor Modification to Project Design The developer of the Segale Warehouse Building #981, a 313,735 square foot warehouse located in the shoreline, has made several revisions to the building plans for the warehouse. The revisions are as follows: 1) construction of a retaining wall on Building # 734 as part of reconfiguring the entrance to the new warehouse site and the adjacent property; and 2) the addition of a 20' x 28' covered fuel island on the west side of the warehouse site. The fuel island would be supplied by two underground tanks, one 18,000 gallon underground diesel tank, and one 6,000 gallon underground gasoline tank. This Addendum is provided for three purposes. First, to provide additional information to the SEPA staff report prepared for E99 -0003, environmental review for a proposed warehouse; second, to review the proposed development addition against the design approved by the Board.of Architectural Review; and third, to amend the shoreline permit issued for the construction of the warehouse. L99 -0006: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit The underground tanks and fuel island are outside the 200 foot shoreline environment, as illustrated on the attached site plan. The zoning on the site is Heavy Industrial, which permits automotive services such as gasoline pumps. This use would also be permitted in the High Impact portion of the Shoreline environment. The retaining wall on Building 734 is outside the Low Impact Environment and inside the High Impact Environment (see attached site plan). An area in the Low Impact Environment has been paved adjacent to the levee. According to information provided by the applicant, the 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 '.∎„ i:i _ 1.7 Interested Parties Segale Warehouse Revisions February 23, 2000 retaining wall is 88 feet and was installed to maintain the raised grade elevation from the river levy to the existing building at 18338 Andover Park West and south to 5801 Segale Park Drive C, the location of the warehouse. Backfill material against the landward side of the levy consists of quarry spalls. Parking/loading facilities are permitted in the Low Impact Environment if adequately screened or landscaped. The levy is benched on the waterward side of the levy adjacent to the Building 734 site. To address the requirement for screening, landscaping will be added to a bench area on the waterward side of the levee. The landscape plantings will be coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The revisions to the project are consistent with the policies of the Shoreline Master Plan, the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan and the Tukwila Zoning Code. E99 -0003 Environmental Review A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on the warehouse when it was initially reviewed by this Department. These revisions to the proposed project fall within the impacts analyzed in the original SEPA Checklist and do not represent a substantial change to the Determination of Nonsignificance issued by this Department. L99 -0007 Design Review TMC 18.60.030 D. authorizes the Director to approve a change in project design if the change represents "minor, insignificant modifications which have no impact on the project design." 1 have reviewed the project plans for D2000 -043, the building permit for the fuel island and believe that the change represented is a minor, insignificant modification that will have no impact on the project design. As a result the revision does not need to be re- reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review. cc: Files: E99 -0003, L99 -0006 and L99 -0007 q: \carol\Segale\SEPA- Addendum.doc 2 re 2 • c� 0' co o w =f. WO • aq� OE • I w. z I-:, z 6 • w w iO N' w ui • U N, • O z SEGALE BUSINESS PARK A LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SNIP TRADE NAME A LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRADE NAME February 16, 2000 Mr. Steve Lancaster City of Tukwila 6300 SouthcenterBlvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Lancaster: RE: Determination of non-significance File No: E99 -0003 The following information is provided for an amendment to the SEPA permit for the property located at 5801 Segale Park Drive "C ". � OF RECEIVED TUKWILA FEB 1 8 2000 PERMIT CENTER A retaining wall, of 88 feet in length, was installed to maintain the raised grade elevation from the river levy to the existing building at 18338 Andover Park West, and south to 5801 Segale Park Drive "C ", the project site. Backfill material against the landward side of the levy consists of quarry spalls, which is not suitable for landscape plants. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Steven R. Nelson Project Manager ban PO Box 88028 • Tukwila,WA 98138 -2028 18000 Andover Park W • Suite 200 • Tukwila, WA 98188 -4798 Telephone 206 575 -2000 • Fax 206 575 -1837 00 r.. _, ..,.. . Z • rt . JU: :U 0�` N U: CO w; W =. LL: w <. N d 1-w z Z :i0 N' • ;o `. ,w Wi H V: co: U • z February 7, 2000 • SEGALE BUSINESS PARK A LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRAOE NAME Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 .:: . .. .. RE: Determination of non significance File No: E99 -0003 Dear Mr. Lancaster. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 9 2.000 PERMIT CENTER Segale Business Park requests that a minor modification be made to the SEPA checklist dated January 6, 1999 for the Building 981 project. The modification involves the addition of a 20' x 28' covered fiiel island on the west end of the site. 'Both the underground tanks and the fiiel island are outside of the 200 foot Shoreline Management Urban Environment. A brief description of the fuel island construction is as follows: • • Two steel columns support the overhead canopy. The canopy is constructed of steel with a sheetmetal fascia. Three fuel dispensers. One 18,000 gallon underground diesel tank. • One 6,000 gallon undergroundgasoline tank. • Associated underground piping and electrical. Enclosed is a site plan showing the location of the fuel island and tanks Your review and findings of this minor modification to the project would be appreciated. If you have any questions, please all me at (206) 575 - 2558. Steven R. Nelson Project Manager enclosure PO Box 88028 • Tukwila,WA 98138 -2028 . 18000 Andover Park W • Suite 200 • Tukwila, WA 98188 -4798 TAi4Piio e,.Z.Q.6.. .?-2000 • Fax 206 575 -1837 z a • • re Lk J U: U 0; . . CO cn W W'= J 1 W o; 2 J . —a • • F- W z I-- O Z t-,• o 0 -_ w uJ; HV'. • • uiz uy .O H �: CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MA a7►.a.u.LNGB � aA Paw! •1,'onmoros Ke. ('.e. FEDERAL AGENCIES 04'13.s. ARMY CORPS OF hINE� ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) .S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE PAZAZI a.( nG1aG,, 4, 11,9p,61„. Q,0, boy 5755 Se a. L.J4 `112L4.—u 5'S OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCY ( ) K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( •) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT *11 ( )•FIRE DISTRICT *2 ( ) K.C..WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ( ( ( ( ( ( .) U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING. ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) D •T OF OCIAL & HEALTH SERV. nnw ,,ww ll''__ (V D0.• OF C•+• IND DIV ✓ `Nv_�""�'1 (V) DE , l , ; = • •�= EPA DIVISION* (� 0WU Q'�'0 � (�) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL 0(d71rJv *'•SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS.- * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION XING COUNTY KGENCIa ( ).14.C. DEPT OF. PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE • ( ) K.C.DE1 & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ).HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY. • SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE : '. ;: ;%:;! FINANCE • BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SW K C CHAMBER_OF COMMERCE CKLESHOOT;INDIAN TRIBE (UWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WPS1DATA \CHKLIST PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT );VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER• DISTRICT *20 ).WATER DISTRICT *125 • ).CITY.OFRENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCI$$ (' ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY.OF SEA -TAC ( ) . CITY -OF BURIEN • ' ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS (•) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT &PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( )_METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDTA \„, z W 6D. J0 00 D7 �. NW = W O: • J. LL Q' • • Z 1— O: ZI--:. w U . • O —. ;0 I--: 2 U; • I- 1, z Please Mail Notice of Decision to: Keith E. Moxon Buck & Gordon 902 Waterfront Place 1011 Westem Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1097 Mark Tierney Crown Cork & Seal Nk 18340 Segale Park Dr. B Tukwila,VA 98188 M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Steve Nelson Segale. Business Park P.O. Box 88050 Tulcwila, WA 98138 -;/ • Alice Kelly dAMAI2L, Shorelands & E ironmental Assistance Program Department o cology 3190 160th venue SE Bellevu A 98008-5452 Andy Levesque King County Water and Land Resources Division v, 700 - 4th Avenue, Suite 2200 .,/ Seattle, WA 98104-5022 Dave Clark King County Water and Land Resources Division 700 - 4th Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104-5022 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development January 6, 2000 Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Design Review File L99 -0007, Segale Building No. 981: Minor Modification to Project Design Dear Steve: Miscellaneous Permit (MI99 -0209) is a request to revise the fence approved by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review from a chain link fence to a wrought iron fence set in concrete posts on the western side of the new warehouse being constructed (Building 981). TMC 18.60.030 D. authorizes the Director to approve a change in project design if the change represents "minor, insignificant modifications which have no impact on the project design." I have reviewed the project plans for MI99 -0209 for the director and believe that the change represented is a minor, insignificant modification that will have no impact on the project design. As a result the revision does not need to be re- reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review. If you have any questions, please call me at 431 -3686. Sincerely, J k Pace Planning Manager cc: Files: L99 -0007 & MI99 -0209 q: \carol \Segale \minormod.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 I A F F I D A*V I T O Notice of Public E Notice of Public DBoard of Packet Q Board of Packet Planning Packet Hearing Meeting Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: Li Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit ODetermination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nons ignif is ance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice LI Notice of Action Official Notice her Nv /G.ee 4' 42aet �,L�J't Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project 61- 111 V—S , anature File Number Z-994 o7 ... Please Mail Notice of Decision to: Keith E. Moxon Buck & Gordon 902 Waterfront Place 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 -1097 Mark Tierney Crown Cork & Seal / 18340 Segale Park Dr. B Tukwila,•WA 98188 M.A. Segale, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Steve Nelson Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Alice Kelly Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program Department of Ecology 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 -5452 Andy Levesque King County Water and Land Resources Division 700 - 4th Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 Dave Clark King County Water and Land Resources Division 700 - 4th Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 z a t) 0: co a ,w J H` 2 u. a D;, 1- ill z 0: 2 no 10 z,. la al CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MAJ...iNGS (v) ( ) ( ) tt L\ rY. Pa i leontoroskt P • e. • FEDERAL AGENCIES awl/ U.S. ARMY CORPS OF �INEER p" ( ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE j) Pft14-0 4 /4414 4 1'(,9{•0,41-,* ) l GL, WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY. ( ( ( ( ( ( U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: (. ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) ( ) POLICE ( ) ( ) PLANNING ( ) ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) ( ) CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WPS1DATA \CHKLIST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. DEPT OF PARKS HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT 4125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE Z �.. W • U 0,. W = CO W � g -� N D' _ d' Z F_, 1- O'. • Z F-� '2 0 • UY • ~: • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Notice of Decision May 28, 1999 To: Applicant Parties of Record This notice is to confirm the decision reached by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review on Thursday, May 27, 1999. The Board of Architectural Review voted to approve the design of a 313,735 square foot warehouse and related offices and the landscaping plan based on the findings and conclusion in the staff report dated May 14, 1999. This letter is issued pursuant to the Permit Application Types and Procedures, Tukwila Municipal Code Zoning Chapter, (18.104.170) on the following project and permit approvals. Project File Number: L99 -0007, Design Review Application Associated Files: L99 -0006 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) & E99 -0003 (SEPA determination) Applicant: Steve Nelson for Segale Business Park Request: Construct a 313,735 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up warehouse with associated office space within 200 feet of the shoreline. The project is subject to design review. Location: 5801 -6199 Segale Park Drive "C" SEPA Determination: DNS Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Bl., Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday; 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m. The planner managing the project is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 431 -3661 for further information. This decision may be appealed to the Tukwila City Council pursuant to TMC 18.104.010 E. by filing a Notice of Appeal within 14 calendar days from the date of the issuance of this Notice of Decision (TMC 18.116.010). Information on the content of the Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Department of Community Development at the address noted above. c: \carol \Segale\notdec.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z rti 6 • 00 ` :milk J F. WO =d. mow, O. z ►- City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mr. Gary Mix Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 RE: Boundary Line Adjustment, File No. L99 -0008 Dear Mr. Mix: May 27, 1999 Enclosed please find comments on the proposed boundary line adjustment from the Building Division. The Public Works Department is currently reviewing the proposed boundary line adjustment. If they have any comments I will pass those along as soon as I receive them. In reviewing the BLA, it appears in two areas (circled on enclosed maps) the property line is proposed to be immediately next to a building. The Heavy Industrial zone requires a five -foot setback in both of the areas circled. Given the Building Code requirements noted in the enclosed memorandum, a greater setback than 5 feet may be required. As indicated on the enclosed map, the current property lines run through the western portion of the proposed warehouse or do not meet the zoning code setback requirement. A building permit cannot be issued for the warehouse proposed for Parcel E when property lines would run through a building. You may want to consider revising the proposed boundary line adjustment to adjust only the boundary lines for parcels C, D and E as an interim step so that this issue can be resolved and then submit a new boundary line adjustment for the remaining parcels. If you have any questions, please call me, at 431 -3661. Sincerely, (Ake 6Yx4e4q/— Carol Lumb Associate Planner Enclosures cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Steve Nelson, Segale Business Park c:\carol\Segale\Mix.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z z I- Jr— ~w 0:: 6 M U O u) o; wW w• o g li D. a: �w z= � O z w w: 0 in 0 I—`. w W - - O? ..z:. U O z 05/27/1999 11:57 206- 205 -5134 King County Water and Land Resoux -cee Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 (106) 296 -6519 (206) 296 -0192 FAX May 26, 1999 Board of Architectural Review City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. RE: Segale Business Park, File Number L99 -0007 Dear Sirs and /or Mesdames: PAGE 02 RECEIVED MAY 2 7 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT This letter is to respectfully request you exercise your authority in reviewing the subject application to ensure its minimum adequacy with respect to both flood control maintenance and ecological resource protection needs. The King County Rivers Section administers the Green River Flood Control Zone District through interiocal agreement with the City of Tukwila. I have previously stated a significant interest in this application and itemized specific concerns and requests in my April 16, 1999 letter to Tukwila Department of Community Development Director Steve Lancaster (enclosed). I remain concerned that the Recommendation stated as Section (6) of Tukwila Associate Planner Carol Lumb's May 10, 1,999 memorandum to Mr, Lancaster fails to adequately address these concerns. I am therefore taking this opportunity to ask your careful consideration of the following; • In Section (2) of Ms. Lumb's Shorelines Memorandum, three management zones are described adjacent to the Green River, as established through the City of Tukwila's Shoreline Master Plan (SMP). The River Zone, within 40 feet of the mean high water mark (MHWM), is described as providing for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control, and landscape enhancement. The 60 foot wide Low Impact Zone adjoining the River Zone is described, In part, as intending to minimize physical impact on the River Zone. Based on a careful review of the site conditions and constraints apparently imposed due to the particular configuration of the subject development proposal, none of these goals is adequately addressed by the project design or permit Recommendation. Taking each one of these goals individually, please note: • Resource Protection;, Aquatic and riparian habitat at this site is severely degraded. There is little lnstream structure to provide for cover, resting, feeding, or flood refuge for either adult or juvenile salmonids. Riparian vegetation has been completely altered and obliterated over time, with the result hat no native vegetation is present. Invasive, non -native species such as blackberries, reed canary grass, and butterfly bush dominate the'site. This condition results In a lack of critical shade cover, river temperature reduction, velocity reduction, sediment deposition, erosion protection, flood refuge, detrital input, and food 05/27/1999 11:57 206- 205 -F1.34 KC WLRD RIVERS S. Page2of7 PAGE 03 organism production crucial to salmonid survival: The Memorandum basically recognizes the presence of.the degraded ecological landscape present along the riverbank at this site, but proposes nothing substantive to protect affected resource values. This is a significant omission from the project requirements, for two reasons. (1) The City's April 23, 1999 Memorandum recommending a Declaration of Non - Significance dearly notes on Page two that " Since the time the SEPA Checklist was prepared, the Puget Sound Chinook salmon has been listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service as a threatened species. This species is found in the Green River." (2) Tukwila Mayor John W. Rants' February 10, 1999 Interim 4(d) Rule Proposed Draft Element states the City's commitment that "Municipal environmental officials will continue to use all applicable codes, standards, ordinances, etc., adopted under existing laws In evaluating the impact and establishing mitigation for municipal and third party developer proposals that may involve "takes" [sic] until the final 4(d) Rule is set" Nowhere in the project . proposal or city Recommendations for permit conditions Is It apparent that this standard has .been applied. It would appear that the Shorelines Permit review and approval process would be the appropriate forum for consideration of these resource needs. To my knowledge, no formal biological or ecological review of the proposal has been conducted nor required to date. Therefore, any historic impacts to the listed species that have resulted from past degradation of the river environment at this site would apparently be perpetuated by the City's approval of the proposal as submitted. This needs to be addressed. • Flood Control Maintenance: Tukwila is the local sponsor of record for maintenance of the federally authorized "Section 205" levee of which the site contains a 1,725 foot long segment. Under the terms of the June, 1992 Green River Interlocal Agreement (GRILA), King County has agreed to undertake all levee maintenance activities for which the City Is obliged with respect to this federal levee system. The direct connection between river habitat and levee maintenance requirements Is the central issue I am addressing to your attention here. Ms. lumb's earlier April 23, 1999 Memorandum concerning the SEPA determination documents a meeting held on April 16, 1999. At this meeting, the United States Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Office stated "at some future time, willows or other trees would be planted on the riverward side, should there be a need to reconstruct the levee." At that same meeting, Corps foundations Engineer Monte Kaiser also stated that future repairs should be considered an unavoidable requirement. for ongoing levee maintenance. The April 23 Memorandum fully agrees with King County's basic concern by stating on • page 4 that "Currently, no room exists for a landscape bench on the riverward . side of the levee." My point here is that approval of the present application without requiring the room required through additional easement widths requested in my earlier correspondence will predude the County's ability to accomplish this work. Because the landscape bench referred to is the absolute minimum area needed to plant "willows or other trees ", it is inappropriate to preclude this possibility by approving the present site design. I must add special emphasis to the nature of this minimum revegetation requirement here, since the federal listing of Chinook salmon triggers an absolute requirement for habitat .. . ,..... 05/27/1999 11:57 206 - 205 -5134 KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 04 Page 3 of 7 restoration in connection with any such "unavoidable" future maintenance repair work. Affects needing to be considered under the Endangered Species Act standards for environmental review include likely future actions reasonably anticipated in connection with the present action." The City's 4(d) commitments promise to address these standards. Review requirements for consideration of future affects under the Endangered Species Act differ in several unique ways from SEPA requirements, and have not yet been addressed. Therefore the time to provide for these future needs Is now, in connection with the present proposal. Based on original design drawings for construction of federal levee improvements dated April 1989, overall river slopes on these levees were to have been constructed at angles of two horizontal feet to every one vertical feet (2H:1V). Actual construction of these Improvements In this reach was performed by the landowner In 1991 on behalf of the City of Tukwila, Based on site surveys submitted as part of the present application, riverbank slopes are at best 1.7H:1V angles. These slopes are significantly oversteepened with respect to minimum factors of safety established for levee construction in federal engineering guidelines. Specific findings regarding slope stability requirements are set forth in the enclosed geotechnical evaluation prepared by Shannon and Wilson, Inc. on behalf of King County. Minimum stability requirements recommended In this report include the option to construct a midslope bench. The Report clearly states, "these improvements, which could include regrading the slope, or a mid -slope bench, may require additional easements to complete construction and should be considered in any land development along the Green River." Please note these findings are based on soils information provided by the project applicant. • Pollution Control: High summer water temperatures and associated low dissolved oxygen levels have been a major water quality impact In the Lower Green River, as documented in several sources dating back to Metro's studies in the 1970's. Vegetative cover is the key resource element in the landscape affecting water temperature. In failing to provide for future shading opportunities in the Shaded Riparian Area (SRA) habitat zone, the present Recommendations fails to meet this. SMA goal. • Landscape Enhancement:, The present Recommendation would require additional landscaping in the Low Impact Environment, and the project has been modified to Indude non - native locust trees along the margins of the existing levee fill. Ironically, no action has been proposed which would do anything substantive to restore native riparian plantings to the SRA habitatzone. This would seem to be the primary focus of the stated goal in the River Habitat Environment. As a further concern, approval of the project without sufficient area to accommodate "willows or other trees" on even a minimally dimensioned midslope bench effectively precludes any future 'riparian landscape restoration or habitat enhancement actions, even though these will dearly be required as a consequence of the recent Chinook listing. • Minimize Physical Impact on the River Zone: My basic request here is that a minimum of an additional 15 feet of site area along the edge of the River Zone needs to be secured In a manner that will allow for future maintenance repairs 05/27/1999 11:57 206 - 205 -51.34 Page 4 of 7 KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 05 and revegetation of the riverbanks at this site. Ongoing, unmitigated impacts to the levee slope stability and both aquatic and riparian habitat areas are inevitable without this protection. My additional, related comments concerning particular items in the Shoreline Memorandum are also included here for emphasis. Regarding Overall Goals of the Shoreline Master Plan stated on Page 2: z 1 z re w wiO UO. • The Recommendation does not adequately "Protect against adverse effects against v w. the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life." The -J F. proposal will perpetuate ongoing impacts affecting federally listed Chinook salmon w o. and their required habitat. 2 • The Recommendation does not adequately "Protect fragile natural resources." It g a would be hard to imagine a more fragile resource than a federally listed species. D • The Recommendation does not adequately "Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic = w habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural Z x. resources." Clearly nothing substantive is proposed to improve upon wholesale 1.., o. historic degradation of habitat in this reach. The text of the Memorandum seems to w �- confuse this goal with the lesser standard of "not interfering ". I would argue the 2 D. Recommendation fails even this lesser test. v w • The Recommendation does not adequately "Recognize, protect, and improve those o ' wildlife habitats, which are valuable natural resources of the state." It seems w w obvious that SRA habitat restoration at this site along the Green River clearly falls 1- % into this category, and needs to be addressed with improvements. At a minimum, u- o w this would Include the provision for future restoration opportunities. co ,V= O ~. z Regarding, Conservation Element Goals addressed on pages 4 and 5 of the Memorandum: • The Response addresses levee stability with the apparent conclusion that the building itself does not impact riverbank slopes I disagree for the reasons set forth in the enclosed geotechnical study and report.. Non -native trees set well back from the SRA habitat zone are discussed, but contribute essentially nothing to the native ecological vegetation needed in this area, near the OHWM. Moreover, the Response seems to take It as a foregone conclusion that the historic presence of the levee now forever precludes meeting any of the Conservation Element Goals listed, In connection with the present site development proposal. Again I disagree. Minimum federal standards for levee landscaping set forth in my April 16 letter would In fact allow for a modest implementation of each of these goals, and would require a minor additional site area to accomplish this. Such provision is moreover fully consistent with slope stability recommendations set forth in the enclosed geotechnical report. I strongly urge you to consider it a minimum condition for issuance of Shorelines permit approval. • Element (1) encourages "preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non - renewable resources." This would appear to apply to potentially extinct saimonids now listed in the Green River as threatened. • Element (2) encourages "preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline." A close. reading of the Memorandum shows there is no "natural character" now present at the site. The Recommendation does 05%27/1999 11:57 206- 205 -51.34 'Page 5 of 7 KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 06 nothing to address this, and fails to assign a condition requiring sufficient land area to provide for this goal in the future, even at a minimum. • Element (3) encourages "preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline." Again, the proposal under consideration neglects to address this goal, and precludes future action reasonably necessary to do so. ESA standards require such actions to be addressed. • Element (4) requires that water quality in the river should "provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable fortes of aquatic life." Juvenile salmonids require shaded conditions in the SRA habitat zone for this goal to be met. My request here is for the minimum site area to provide the room needed for this goal to be met. Regarding Shorelines Regulations discussed on pages 5, 6, and 7: • Element (2) states the proposal ,Is consistent with goals discussed above. For the. reasons noted, I disagree, and request additional conditions providing for at least minimum consistency. • Element (4) requires no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment, but fails to address future establishment of such vegetation within the crucial SRA habitat zone. • Element (7) suggests that wildlife habitat will be protected by not being altered. This overlooks the fact that protection here will require some form of restoration. This is certainly true when considering ESA requirements for Chinook salmon. Even if construction of this restoration is not required of the landowner at this time, the minimum site area needed to provide the room for this to occur in the future Is certainly required. • Element (8) requires that the "perimeters of landfills or other Iandforms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation ...for erosion prevention." Certainly the riverbank is such a landform, and certainly It is susceptible to erosion. Slope stability requirements are set forth in the enclosed geotechnicai report. Erosion damages have been documented here In annual reports provided by King County to the City of Tukwila since 1995. Findings in these reports has been confirmed by Corps of Engineers personnel. The minimum site area needed for such vegetation is the subject of my request, and is fully consistent with all accepted Corps practices, publications, guidelines, federal codes, and standards. • Element (9) omits to state the requirement for a Section 7 Consultation with the national Marine Fisheries Service under the Endangered Species Act. The Corps of Engineers review noted here meets the broad definition of federal action stated In the November 1989 Section 205 Lower green river Flood Control Study for this levee system, and triggers this requirement. This is consistent with the qty of Tukwila's commitments under the interim 4(d) Rule, as cited in Mayor Rant's letter as well. Mayor Rant's letter specifies that City environmental officials will apply this standard to third,party developer proposals such as the present application. This is my request here. Regarding specific shoreline regulations in the river environment on page 8, I am puzzled that no regulations are cited. The proposal as now configured effectively precludes future restoration of aquatic and riparian habitat in this presently degraded environment. I am requesting a minimum site area to provide room for future actions of this nature. Clearly these are called for under ESA. Just as dearly, the present 05/27/1999 11:57 206-205-F1-9,4 KC WLRD RIVERS SFr;. PAGE 07 Pap 6of7 proposal should not be permitted to effectively foreclose restoration in this shoreline environment. Specific requirements for landscaping in the river environment surely are stated in Tukwila's SMP, and should both be cited and addressed by the proposal. Regarding specific shoreline regulations in the low impact environment, it is within this zone that an additional land area needs to be preserved for future slope stabilization and revegetation needs within the adjoining river environment. This would appear to be included in the cited requirement for "appropriate" landscaping, inasmuch as no native riparian landscaping is presently part of the proposal. Clearly native landscape plantings along the riverbank are 'appropriate ", and should be provided for in the site layout. Regarding Conclusions listed on pages 10 and 11: • Item (3) faits to address stabilization needs on the riverward side of the levee and riverbank, as set forth in the enclosed geotechnical report. • Item (4) incorrectly concludes that site development will not interfere with aquatic habitat in the Green River. Ongoing degradation of crucial SRA habitat needs vital to listed salmonids will be perpetuated under the present site design. The Recommendation fails to address this need. • Item (6)(C) incorrectly concludes the project will not disrupt trees or vegetation in the river environment. Ongoing disruption of vegetation will be perpetuated unless provided for in the site design. • Item (6)(E) fails to note that existing state temperature standards are chronically violated in the lower Green River due to a lack of shade cover, such as is found missing at this particular site. • Item (6)(F) fails to address critical listed Chinook habitat needs at this site, and the effective foreclosure of future wildlife habitat restoration opportunities under the present site layout design. Provision for these reasonably necessary future actions is itself required to be addressed under ESA. Failure to make such provisions . perpetuates the ongoing disturbance now characteristic of the site. • • Item (7) is simply not addressed in the text of the report. The referenced plantings of non - native Honey Locusts is apparently just outside the edge of the River . Environment. It seems clearly apparent that any landscaping requirements within the River Environment itself have been categorically excluded from consideration in the present proposal, particularly within the critical SRA habitat zone along the water's edge. In addition to this omission, any possibility of minimal native riparian landscape establishment which might reasonably be expected to be accomplished in future slope stabilization repairs is effectively precluded, as noted in the SEPA review document. Again, this Is the basic request I am stating here. • Item (8)(A) confirms that landscaping referred to in Item (7) is, in fact located outside the River Environment. The point of my request here is to utilize the • requirements of the Low Impact Environment to provide sufficient, minimal room for the native landscape plantings essential to salmonid survival along the water's edge within the. River Environment. • Item (9) neglects to address the concerns and recommendations in my earlier correspondence. My April 16 letter states that the results of our geotechnical evaluation of slope stability requirements would be forthcoming. Unfortunately, these were not completed prior to the final SEPA declaration. 1 still believe they are important to consider with respect to the Shoreline Permit z , ~w -1 U UO co co LL u O < CO a =w zI zo LU ui U D O - O I-. wW H 0' IL O ui of z 5/27/1999 11:57 206- 205 -5t44 Page 7 of 7 KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 08 In conclusion, I respectfully request the addition of a single condition for approval of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit as recommended in my April 16, 1999 letter. This would read: Additional site area along the landward side of the existing levee shall be preserved free from improvements or landscaping, sufficient in width to accommodate future relocation of the existing levee access road at an overall riverbank slope angle of at least 2 horizontal feet to every vertical foot (2H:1V), but measuring no Tess than 15 feet in width. Thank you for your consideration of my concerns. If you have any questions about this letter, please call me at 206 -298 -8388. You may also wish to contact Senior Engineer Andy Levesque of my staff at 206 - 296 -8279 with any questions concerning slope stability and levee maintenance needs. Senior Ecologist Ruth Schaefer can address questions regarding habitat needs and ESA review requirements, at 206 - 296 -8365. Sincerely, Dave Clark Manager, Rivers Section Enclosures Cc: (ow) Steve Lancaster, Director, City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Carol Lumb, Associate Planner PhII Frasier, Senior Engineer, Department of Public Works Ryan R. Partee, Fisheries Biologist Debbie Arlma, Assistant Manager, WLR Division Sarah Ogler, Program Coordinator, Green River Basin Program Andy Levesque, Senior Engineer Ruth Schaefer, Senior Ecologist Noel Glibrough, Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Paul Komoroske, Emergency Operations Branch Monte Kaiser, Geotechnlcal. Branch z �QQw. J U; Uo CO U) w; wI J I- LL: Ili O' g -: a (0 3r 1_ UJ z 1- o, 2 ul H U: Z. ui N 0 z Merno Tukwila Building Division 6300 SouthCenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3670 To: Carol Lumb, Planner From: Ken Nelsen, Plans Examiner Date: 05/25/99 Re: Segale lot line adjustment application number L99 -0008 The alteration to existing property lines will require the applicant to submit an architectural analysis for each subject building of each lot as follows. 1. Provide architectural documentation showing compliance with U.B.C. Section 503, "location to property lines ". This should cover fire- resistive walls. occupancies, and table 5 -A requirements, Provide documentation for compliance with U.B.C. Section 504, "allowable building areas ". Include details for area increases per U.B.C. Section 505, 506, 507 and table 5 -13 as applicable. • Page 1 z .. k Et J U O O;. u)C3'. CO W . City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: RECOMMENDATION: Prepared May 21, 1999 May 27, 1999 Notice of Application posted and mailed to surrounding properties March 19, 1999 Notice of Public Hearing published, mailed to surrounding properties and posted on site May 13, 1999 L99 -0007 E99 -0003 Environmental File L99 -0006 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Steve Nelson, for Segale Business Park To approve the design of Segale Building 981, a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse with associated office and maintenance facilities adjacent to the Green River. 5801 Segale Park Drive "C" Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial Determination of Nonsignificance Approval 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 � ...... • z: re 2 J U: 'o O co N O, w i; J �- w �. to'co: w Wt H C.Y. V y; O H Staff Report to the BAR Segale Building 981 STAFF CONTACT: Carol Lumb, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc L99 -0007 A. Site Plan B. Building Elevations C. Landscaping Plan D. Lighting Plan E. 1/25/99 Letter from Ken Large, Landscape Architect F. Design Review Criteria Response G. Shoreline Decision and Staff Report H. SEPA Determination and Staff Report I. Typical Cross Section of Shoreline J. Color Board (to be provided at hearing) 2 Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 FINDINGS Vicinity /Site Information A. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse with associated office and maintenance facilities on a 16.54 parcel. The Green River borders the parcel on the east and south sides and as a result, the project is subject to the Shoreline Management Act. B. Existing Development: The site was used as a storage yard for Seattle Tractor Company and a stockpile area for excess pitrun material. The stockpiled soils, which at one time comprised a mound approximately 60 feet high on the western one -third of the site, have been used to preload the building site. A carpenter's shop currently exists on the site and will be demolished prior to constructing the warehouse. C. Surrounding Land Use: The parcel is located on the Green River in an industrial park. The surrounding area on the north and west is designated Heavy Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Heavy Industrial. On the west is an asphalt plant, on the north a street and then other industrial buildings and on the south and east, the Green River. Across the river is an office park, a City of Kent park and the Green River Trail. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the parcel along the river. D. Terrain: The site is generally flat, with soils that are comprised of silty sands and gravels. A 60 -foot soil stockpile, which was located on the western one -third of the site, has been spread across the proposed building footprint area for the purpose of preloading the site in preparation of constructing the building. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee forms the southern and eastern boundary for the site. c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 3 Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 E. Vegetation: z i ~. The site currently contains no vegetation as it has been graded and soil placed to re w preload to building site. A landscaping plan has been provided and will be �' discussed below. J i c o' w c uiw. F Access: w z. J H, Access is provided to the site via Segale Park Drive "C," which is one of several w 0 roads that is part of the internal private road system in the Segale Business Park. g ` The Business Park may be accessed either via Southcenter Parkway or South u- 180th Street. = a I— w s: Z I-- I-0 wI—. w. An EIS was prepared in 1974 prior to the construction of the original buildings in the v u) Segale Business Park. In subsequent years, additional buildings have been added to the 0 -; site. SEPA for this proposed building was issued on April 23, 1999. The Shoreline w w Substantial Development permit was issued on May 10, 1999 (see Attachment G). One condition was applied to the Shoreline Permit, that additional landscaping be provided in — O: the Low Impact Environment of the shoreline. That additional landscaping has . been • .w co added to the landscaping plan (Attachment A). The 21 -day appeal period for the H Shoreline permit closes on June 1, 1999. z BACKGROUND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CRITERIA Design review is required for all projects in the Heavy Industrial zone that are located within 200 feet of the Green River. In the following discussion, the BAR criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. The applicant's responses to the BAR criteria are found in Attachment E. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. c: \carol \Segale \DRstafrpt.doc 4 Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 Response: The site is located in an industrial park on the Green River. The height of the building, 33 feet, is less than the maximum height permitted within the shoreline — 35 feet maximum. Attachment H "Typical Cross Section of the Shoreline" illustrates the location of the existing grade on the site and the location of the finished grade. Currently the building site is below the levee. The added fill to raise the grade will have the effect of reinforcing the levee. Twelve and one -half feet of landscaping have been provided at the front, as required by the Heavy Industrial zone. Additional landscaping has been provided at the entrances to the office areas, to enhance the appearance of the entrances. The front of the building includes a number of truck delivery bays — these are exposed to the street, although the character of the industrial park is similar, with other buildings having loading docks in the front or visible from the front. Parking is located in various locations around the building as needed for the warehouse employees. Additional landscaping is provided in the Low Impact shoreline environment, as required by TMC 18.44.130 B.3. 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Response: Consistent building elements have been used throughout the site. The proposed warehouse is a very large structure, 313,735 square feet, with 61 truck delivery loading docks or bays. The southern portion of the site is shaped by the Green River, and the building shape somewhat mimics the undulating motion of the riverbank. The warehouse itself is over 1000 feet in length. The size of the building is similar to other buildings in the business park. The proposed landscaping provides an appropriate transition to adjacent properties. The circulation pattern on -site has been designed to provide safe movements for the trucks serving the building. The loading facilities are primarily located in the front and the back of the building, with a few loading docks or truck bays located on the west side. Parking is located away from the loading docks to avoid conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Vehicular access to the site c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 5 z �W, re JU U O: CI tu J I-- • LL WO.. LL Q. - d. _; z1. O. z DI U� uji H- LL —0 , LLI z • H � O z Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 may be obtained either via South 180th Street and then Segale Park Drive "C, " or via Southcenter Parkway to Segale Park Drive "C." 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The landscaping plan, Attachment C, illustrates the proposed landscaping for the site. The Heavy Industrial zone requires 12.5 feet of landscaping at the front of the site. No other landscaping is required by the zone except for landscape islands in the parking areas. The applicant has added landscaping to the areas around the entrances to each of the office spaces to enhance these areas. Landscaping is also provided in the parking areas. Landscaping is required in the River and Low Impact Environments of the shoreline. As a result, Honey Locust trees will be provided on the landward side of the levee, just outside the 30 -foot easement granted to King County for maintenance of the levee. Native grass will be planted as a ground cover. This area will not be irrigated, as there is concern about the impact of irrigation on the stability of the levee. Sixty trees will be planted just outside the 30 -foot easement area, as the code requires that the trees be spaced every 30 feet, on center, at a minimum. Through the approval of the shoreline permit, additional landscaping is required in the Low Impact environment, as illustrated on Attachment A. For the additional landscaping area on the southwestern portion of the site, after the first row of honey locust trees, evergreen trees will be used to provide year -round c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 6 z JU: .0 O: vo0 J U WO LLQ - d: Z� I— O W 1—. D :0U ,0 111 U1, =H LLO z. Ham; z Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 green vegetation. The requirement for evergreen trees will be added as a condition of the design review approval. A fence will run along the western side of the site to the landward side of the levee and then turn east, running approximately 420 feet. This will screen an area utilized for truck deliveries as well as a proposed storage area for heavy equipment. The dumpsters will be screened with concrete enclosures. Several types of lighting are provided on the site and discussed in more detail under #4 below. The proposed lighting is shielded to avoid spillage onto adjacent properties. 4. Building Design. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; D. Colors should be harmonious with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: The scale of the proposed building is similar to other industrial warehouse type facilities in the Industrial Park. The architectural style is concrete tilt -up, with visual interest added by several features. First, since the original submittal, the color scheme has been revised to add a third color to the building color palette. The main color of the building has been lightened to a creamy beige color, with a slightly darker shade ( "Lulled Beige ") used at the base of the building. The metal canopies, which overhang the truck docking areas, will be painted "Spice." The concrete pilasters will be "Crisp Khaki" while the diamond accents and reveal lines will be the same color as the pilasters, "Spice." Second, reveal lines and medallions are used to add architectural detail to the building facade along with pilasters and windows in some of the warehouse wall c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 7 z I- Z' 6 001 CO 0 W= w O. 2 g J LL _° w H'= z� o, Z I— W U0 O 0I—`:. W W, u. H O z W.. 0 N. 0 z Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 panels. The windows will be tinted bronze, with the frames a complementing bronze shade. Third, the office portions of the building will be configured differently from the warehouse, with two rows of windows to vary the building appearance. Landscaping will be used in the front of the offices to also enhance the building's appearance and differentiate the office areas from the warehouse areas. The lighting plan is attached as Attachment D. Two different types of lighting are shown on the building exterior. On the rear of the building, facing the Green River, the building elevations show a wall mounted light that will illuminate the rear building area but not spill outside the building site, which is prohibited by the Shoreline code. The light is covered on the top with the light directed down (see Fixture Type A, Attachment D2). The front of the building is illuminated by a different type of wall mounted light, which is a fixture that distributes light in a more widespread manner (see Fixture Type C, Attachment D3). The parking areas will use the same light standard as used on the rear of the building only it will be a pole mounted light. Rooftop fixtures will be setback from 14 to over 120 feet from the edge of the building. TMC 18.50.080 requires that mechanical equipment be setback at least 10 feet from the edge of the roof and not exceed 20 feet in height. The HVAC units range in height from 8 to 12 feet in height. S. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: A picnic table will be provided for warehouse employee use at the southeastern portion of the building. c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 8 z _ 1` W: re J U. 00 .U: vow w =` J f—: w }0 w< co t=- w. Z z� 0. z ON 17I— 'w W H U Z, V O ~' z Staff Report to the BAR L99 -0007 Segale Building 981 CONCLUSIONS 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The southern side of the building is located along the Green River. The building facade in the rear has been modulated to shape it somewhat to the shape of the riverbank. The site is flat and the building will be within the height limitation of the shoreline environment. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: The site is located in an area zoned for heavy industrial use. Other structures in the area are similar in character, with truck loading docks and associated offices. The proposed warehouse facility fits the character of the area. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: The landscape plan, as revised, provides the required landscaping at the front of the site as well as landscaping at the entrances to the offices on site. Landscaping is provided in the parking areas on the east and west sides of the site. In addition, landscaping is provided in the Low Impact Environment, as required by TMC 18.44.140. Honey locust trees and native grass will be planted in the areas adjacent to the river, as noted on the landscaping plan. The applicant will be required to include evergreen trees in the southwestern Low Impact Environment area. The lighting standards and fixtures appear to be compatible with the building and adjacent area and complement the building design. 4. Building Design: The building design is typical of combination office /warehouse buildings. The majority of the construction materials will be concrete. Visual interest has been added through the use of pilasters, reveal lines, diamond symbols, windows and the different colors used for the building itself. Lighting is provided in the parking lot and on the building itself as illustrated on the Illumination Plan (Attachment F). The color scheme is harmonious with no brilliant or garish colors used. c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 9 z w re 2: V; U O` co 0 w z' — 1- cn u. W O}} J. a co _ a: F-al Z I— O. Z:. o U co 'O —' D I—:. LIJ = cy LL re; Z' w CO O ~� z Staff Report to the BAR Segale Building 981 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: L99 -0007 A picnic table will be provided for staff use at the southeast corner of the building. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design of Segale Building 981 with the following condition: 1. Evergreen trees will be required in the southwestern landscape area within the Low Impact Environment in the area beyond the first row of Honey Locust trees. c: \carol \Segale \DRstaffrpt.doc 10 A F F I D A V I T Vaehili gull ONotice of Public Hearing 'Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet []Planning Commission Agenda Packet E Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit QShoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on 5 flDetermination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance fl Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice fl Notice of Action Official Notice 0 Other E Other OeL Name of Project -(L, File Number Ls 1q - 00a7 Signature z X r- :H Z'. Imo; o O,. CO C3, CO =; J w0;. J Q; = a. =ti dr.. r Z w. D o 0 N:. oi-::. W H U ui.z' VT... O z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MAY 13, 1999 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Steve Nelson, for Segale Business Park has filed an application for Design Review, File Number L99 -0007, to construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse with associated office and maintenance facilities at 5801 — 6199 Segale Park Drive "C ". The proposed warehouse is located adjacent to the Green River. You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing scheduled for May 27, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. before the Board of Architectural Review. The hearing will take place at City Hall in the City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. To confirm the time and date before the hearing, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Permits applied for include: • Design Review (L99 -0007) • Shoreline Substantial Development (L99 -0006) • SEPA Checklist (E99 -0003) Other known required permits include: • Land Altering Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. c: \carol \Segale \pubnot.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • • W. • lr 2, J U; .0 O: N 0: WILV w 0 gam, u.a! W a. mow`. z 1-11 wW. O. • z; -11.1 N. z• CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MA..,iNGS p& V ornOrOS ) iyl4 °+'� FEDERAL AGENCIES m S nca.Sr4l .si U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT i4,4 4 TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) U S WEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY W'HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT v ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( .) TCI CABLEVISION ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ).KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ✓ ( 4 MLA%c/va Mx,/ e5 SovviCt. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES OFFCL FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( )/SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V ( MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE \(A DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WPS1DATA \CHKLIST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ),DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV 1:•( VI DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* viVi OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES a {ty1 . 4lic) i-Lkl ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE '/(V) K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL V X K� (c wetf Nco- tvva.( SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES � v✓ O O 5 �' �% k t t.14/€ , Lv. HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY 4j+}0'. SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY 1� SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT do RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES CITY PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY AGENCIES 9.Scsvvr.[ S Stli to '19) OL1 —SUZZ btu& UCW IL pr✓lG(v1 Le W es1 (e.- ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES /(Vr METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE DCLU &e- Z • Z' 6D. 0O` • .co Cl; CO W • W CO IL! W 0; J: 11--_: Z� Z al La 1•. 111.1 O;. L H O Z CITY OF TUKWILA 5,M 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. h,(,io • TUKWILA, WA 98188 -2599 0 (206) 433 -1800 aaa CD-0".‘k N1�Ghae1' j rev ►tt9 , ?Iat,c- Hama Q,/ 6:vo ;, co r■ sew, $ 3 '-t U S.eS r..t.e, ?cw ILA✓. 4S" CITY OF TUKWILA ' `-O'" 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. S''/U TUKWILA, WA 98188 -2599 iu"} °C (206) 433 -1800 Gttt-uc/ni'.c"...i.s' z ~ W r 6 0 00 u) 0 CO LII W I-- O LL WO LLL a 0 0 2d z• = 1- 0 zI- WW 20 U O O N CI I-- W W .z w U= R. O z M. A. Segale, Inc. PO Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Cadillac Plastic 18292 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Familian NW 18323 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Crown Cork & Seal 18340 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 United Stationers 18300 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Gaco Western PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 Crate Tech, Inc. 6206 South 190`h Street Kent, WA 98032 La Pianta Limited Partnership PO Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 Schoenba'• Ier j. • rises Lic 13256 North 1 : ay # 11 Bellevue ':5 TBI Building LLC 6412 S. 190th St. Kent, WA 98032 Key n Br then 18301 dover P rk est Tukwil , A 98188 Columbia Packaging 18296 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Tractor Parts 18349 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 A. America 18255 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 Rock -Tenn 18340 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Reid Plastics, Inc. 6545 South Glacier Place Tukwila, WA 98188 Family Life Insurance 18285 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Gaco Western, Inc. PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 City of Kent 220 4th Ave. South Kent, WA 98032 James Campbell Estate 1001 Kamokila Blvd Kapolei, HI 96707 Fletcher's Fine Foods 18338 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Alpak Food Equipment 18298 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Viking Office Products 18300 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 General Medical Corp. 18325 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 The ;.x M. er 6230 0th Street Kent, WA 98032 Materials, Inc. 6214 South 190`h Street Kent, WA 98042 Br & 19000 Se e, 6,8155 Eliz NE itchell Meteor Building Assoc. 120 W. Dayton St. #C1 Edmonds, WA 98020 w: U O' cn w w z: J w0 g• . U-< 0) ▪ a. • _ . z 1-, 1- 0 Z 1-. UJ w w. H U. 0 O Z; ,VN. 01- z 13ruce & Elizabeth Mitchell '.0. Box 99151 >eattle, WA 98199 Schoenbachler Enterprises 6728 - 134th Ct. NE Redmond, WA 98052 The Box Maker 6412 S. 190th St. Kent, WA 98032 Keyston 18303 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 M. A. Segale, Inc. PO Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Cadillac Plastic 18292 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Familian NW 18323 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Crown Cork & Seal 18340 Segale Park Dr "B" • Tukwila, WA 98188 United Stationers 18300 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Gaco Western PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 Crate Tech, Inc. 6206 South 190th Street Kent, WA 98032 La Pianta Limited Partnership PO Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 Schoenba'• • ler E • • rises Lic 13256 North ):• ay # 11 Bellevue ofA • s c 5 TBI Building LLC 6412 S. 190th St. Kent, WA 98032 Keyst n Brother; 18301 dover P rk West Tukwil , A 95188 Columbia Packaging 18296 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Tractor Parts 18349 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 A. America 18255 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 Rock -Tenn 18340 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Reid Plastics, Inc. 6545 South Glacier Place Tukwila, WA 98188 Family Life Insurance 18285 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Gaco Western, Inc. PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 City of Kent 220 4th Ave. South Kent, WA 98032 James Campbell Estate 1001 Kamokila Blvd Kapolei, HI 96707 Bruce & Elizabeth Mitchell P.O. Box 99151 Seattle, WA 98199 Schoenbachler Enterprises 6728 - 134th Ct. NE Redmond, WA 98052 Keyston 18303 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Fletcher's Fine Foods 18338 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Alpak Food Equipment 18298 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Viking Office Products 18300 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 General Medical Corp. 18325 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 The-B xM er 6230 1 1 h -4.,9 to Street Kent, WA 98032 Materials, Inc. 6214 South 190' Street Kent, WA 98042 Br . & _Mitchell 19000 • % °CNE Sege, � • 8155 Meteor Building Assoc. 120 W. Dayton St. #C1 Edmonds, WA 98020 The Box Maker 6412 S. 190th St. Kent, WA 98032 -+ -.. a r/w J U: 0 00. CO =, w 0' g a; D. i a. z� z�. uj D o, 0 — of w w. 1- z. Z' 0 z Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal LettvE 6 1 1 s.� Mph 11° From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 Date of Transmittal: 5 -11 -99 Type of Permit: Substantial Development Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Name: LaPianta Limited Partnership dba Segale Business Park Address P. O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 Is the applicant the property owner? Yes To: Department of Ec&) NW Regional Office 3190 160th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 98008 -5452 y Date of Receipt: Applicant's Representative: Name: Steve Nelson (206) 575 -2000 Location of the property: 5801 — 6199 Segale Park Dr. "C: ", Tukwila; SE 1/4 35 -23 -04 Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Description of Project: Construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse with related office and maintenance space within 200 feet of the shoreline. Notice of Application Date: March 19, 1999 Phone Number: c : \carol\segale\shorecov.doc Final Decision Date: May 10, 1999 Carol Lumb, Associate Planner, City of Tukwila (206) 431 -3661 W. J U! oO ca N W WI J 1: CO LL w 0. g 1. _° F_ w z __ 1-: al la, O la eft; al Lill O:. Z'. 11J w 'O z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Lancaster, Diryp FM: Carol Lumb, Associ tC'anner RE: Shoreline Permit: L99 -0006, Segale Business Park Building 981 Date: May 10, 1999 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves the construction of a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse building with related offices within 200 feet of the Green River, a shoreline of the State. Attachment A is a copy of the site plan; Attachment B is a copy of the landscaping plan. 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The Shoreline Master Plan establishes three management zones adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Zone: An impact buffer area which provides for resor.rce protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. Low Impact Zone: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. High Impact Zone: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below along with a discussion of the proposed project. 6300 Southcerrte Boule and Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Faz (206) 431-3665 z • re 11 • J U. oO W = JF.; LL' O. •LL Z d. W Z 0• U� • i W' �U • .z O z L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: Overall Goals: 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats, which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. Response: The proposed project is to construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up building, which will be used primarily for warehouse activities, with associated office and maintenance space. The project is located in an area of the City designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map for Heavy Industrial activity and is taking place on a parcel of land located within an industrial park. Adjacent land uses consist of other industrial buildings within the industrial park, across the river is an office park and City of Kent park. The Green River Trail is located across the river. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the- site along the river. The project will not discharge storm water into the river or otherwise impact the shoreline environment. Given the nature of the development, the project will promote economic development in the City, which is one aspect of enhancing the public interest. The development will enhance the stability of the levee on the landward side through the addition of fill, which is in the public interest. There is an opportunity to reduce the amount of impervious surface on the site by increasing the landscaping in the Low Impact Environment in areas that are not needed for the truck access along the eastern edge of the site or the fire access way in the rear of the building, which is also in the overall public interest. The project will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. There are no culturally significant features on the site. The project will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. Public access to the river is available on the opposite side of the river from this project on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. c: \caro I\segale\shorerpt. doc 2 z • �u1 UO NO J ~ U) u- w0 gQ (1.) d w z= f- �O z �- n o. U o w uj F. Z ui V= O~ z L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Economic Development Element Goals: 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. z 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term ' i z over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. re w2 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and t6 v discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. o o 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is co o co w enhanced. _I i_ 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with N w` shoreline goals and policies. 2 LQ Response: As noted above, the project will create 313,735 square feet of warehouse with z w related office space. The project will generate construction jobs during the time the z' building is under construction and permanent employment for approximately 40 to 75 z O people and to that extent enhances the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila. The w w proposed building is a permanent structure and will result in long -term benefits to the City D o and the economic health of the shoreline. p cn: 0 1- w w: H U' u" O. .z 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of . cw.) Tukwila..... p I—' 4. Encourage public access to privately owned shorelines, consistent with private ?. Public Access Element Goals: property rights. 5. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. Response: The goals of this section relate to providing public access to the river. There is a public trail system that runs the length of the Green River. In this portion of the river, the trail is located on the opposite side of the river, so the general public will not have access to the river from this site. An outdoor picnic area for on -site employees will be provided, although it will be located adjacent to the building rather than on the levee system. Circulation Element Goals: The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads or public facilities within the shoreline. Internal circulation will be provided to the rear of the warehouse in the Low Impact Environment of the shoreline. Access for trucks to the rear truck bays will be provided on the east side of the site. A 20 -foot fire access lane, the width required by c: \carp I\segale\shorerpt.doc 3 L99 -0006: Segale Business ?ark Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit the fire department, will be provided from the west to the rear of the building. This access lane will be gated to prevent unauthorized vehicles from accessing the site from the west. z Recreational Element Goals: z 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon n the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. v O 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the vi w shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. co u. w O' Response: A public trail system runs along the Green River, alternating sides of the river 2 on which it is located. On this section of the river, the trail is located on the opposite side of the river. N z Shoreline Use Element Goals: Z O w w. 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the n o. quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. p N 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development ° f• = along the river. v u. H Response: An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee has been constructed along the iu z'.. southern portion of the site. The property was used for many years to stockpile soil in the v N southwestern one -third of the site in a large pile, which reached 60 feet in height at times. 01— Both the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Survey drawing and the shoreline profile cross sections illustrate the location of the stockpile. The proposed warehouse with related offices is consistent with the zoning and land use designation and is appropriate for its location in the industrial park. The project is consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Conservation Element Goals: 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. c:lcarollsegale\shorerpt.doc 4 L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: The natural character of the river in the area of the proposed project has been altered to a major extent due to the construction of the levee to provide flood protection. It has been determined that the proposed building does not impact the stability of the levee. Landscaping will be added on the landward side of the levee to soften the visual impacts of the development of the warehouse on users of the river trail on the opposite side of the river. Additional landscaping will be required to be added to what is shown on the landscaping plan to reduce the amount of impervious surface in the Low Impact Environment, which will enhance the natural character of the river and improve overall quality of water that is flowing to the P17 Basin. Landscaping along the levee has been coordinated with the Corps of Engineers to address concerns that agency had about trees with large root systems being located in or adjacent to the levee prism. As a result, the type of tree to be planted in the landscaping area has been revised from a Thuja Hogan (Western Cedar) to the Honey Locust tree, and grass will be used as ground cover rather than planting Rubus Calcinoides as originally proposed. The landscaping will enhance the aesthetic value of the shoreline. 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: 1. The use is in conformance with the regulation :: of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Heavy Industrial. Warehouses with associated offices are a permitted use in that zone. The Tukwila Board of Architectural will review the project at a public hearing to consider the design of the building and the landscaping plan. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 2, above is a discussion of the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program with the addition of landscaping in the Low Impact Environment. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. c: \carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 5 L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. Small portions of the proposed building are located in the Low Impact Environment, where it is permitted as long as the height does not exceed 35 feet. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; Response: There are no existing trees or vegetation on the levee system or remaining on the site. Prior to the preloading of the building envelope, the only vegetation on site was some grass. Landscaping will be planted in the front of the building, as required by the landscaping code. Additional landscaping is being provided on the sides of the building to enhance a building entrance that is located on the western side and to provide an area for employees to eat out doors on the east side, along with a small amount of landscaping in the parking area on the east side. Honey locust trees and native grass will be planted in the Low Impact Environment, just outside a 30 -foot easement that has been granted to King County for access to the levee for maintenance purposes. As noted above, the type of tree to be planted has been coordinated with the Corps of Engineers to ensure compatibility . with the existing levee system. 5. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and will drain into the P17 drainage basin. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be altered by the construction of this project. With the addition of additional landscaping in the Low Impact Environment, there may be an improvement of wildlife habitat over what currently exists landward of the levee. c: \carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 6 z _ •; • w cc JU OO• LO w: J w o; g co ±w r z �. zo w 2 o' O (12- of ww 1— -` u• z, O H, L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 8. All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Response: A land altering permit will be required for this project. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be installed to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed to convey storm water from the site. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: No federal permits are required, although the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the project to ensure that construction of the warehouse does not impact the stability of the levee. The State Department of Ecology will review the shoreline permit. King County Water and Land Resources Division has provided comments on the project. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is involved with this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: The dumpster for the rear of the building is located outside the Low Impact Environment. All other disposal areas are located well outside the Shoreline Overlay zone. 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Response: No property is proposed for acquisition with this project. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. c: \caro Ilsegale\shorerpt.doc 7 z 1Z w re Qg. J O 00. N cn W= J i^. Uo w g Q. zw 1 z af moo! O - .01-. W` t— U. w t— _z 0- o I.-. 0 z L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: This project does not propose any landfilling within the river channel. 15. ... (R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: As noted earlier, there are no trees existing on the site. B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. Uses in the River Environment are restricted to such uses as footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The River Environment on this site ends approximately at the landward catch point of the levee. No improvements or development are proposed within the River Environment on this site. The applicant is proposing to plant Honey Locust trees at 30 feet on center along with native grass, as required by this section of the Shoreline Overlay district. C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the river environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking /loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. Within the low impact environment on this site are located parking, portions of the warehouse structure, and vehicle access ways, including access for trucks. TMC 18.44.140 B. states: Low impact environment uses shall conform to the following standards: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations; Response: The Heavy Industrial zone requires 12.5 feet of landscaping on the front of the site. No landscaping is required on the sides or in the rear in this zone district. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan, which indicates landscaping on the front, as well as some landscaped areas on the west and east sides. No landscaping currently is proposed in the rear, except for the landscaping along the river just outside the River Environment. Additional landscaping will be required (see item #3, below) in the Low c:\carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 8 +is L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Impact Environment to ensure consistency with the goals of this shoreline environment and to reduce the amount of impervious surface 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking /loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; Response: Internal vehicle circulation to the rear of the building runs along the east side of the building. This internal circulation system is located more than 10 feet from the building. An access road for maintenance of the levee system is located along the top of the levee. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six -foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d. Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: A cyclone fence with slats is proposed to run the length of the western side of the site and then along the river for approximately 450 feet to provide screening in this portion of the Low Impact Environment. For the remainder of the rear of the building, the only landscaping that is provided are the honey locust trees and native grass along the river at the edge of River Environment. There are opportunities for additional screening in the area south of the proposed building outside of the area needed for maneuvering the trucks utilizing the loading docks at the rear of the building and the access lane needed for emergency vehicle access. No information was submitted to indicate the need for the amount of paved areas shown on the landscaping plan. Additional landscaping will be required in the Low Impact Environment to minimize the physical and visual impact of the building on the river zone and to reduce the amount of impervious surface on the site. The general areas where additional landscaping will be required are illustrated on Attachment C. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking /loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. c: \carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 9 L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 4. COMMENTS: Comments were received during the Notice of Application period from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, King County Water and Land Resources Division and from an adjacent property owner (Attachments D, E and F, respectively). The issues raised in these letters were addressed through the analysis of environmental impacts of the proposed project in the SEPA staff report. Copies of the comment letters are attached. The Corps has no objections to this project (see Attachment D -2). z N u w0 5. SEPA: wa A determination of non - significance was issued on April 23, 1999. The appeal period N d closed on May 7, 1999; no appeals or comments were received on the DNS. A copy of the _ SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment G). z F-- zI- w (3 '0 N CONCLUSIONS 1. The project site is located in an industrial park and is designated Heavy Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Heavy Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use, a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up warehouse with associated office and maintenance facilities, is consistent with adjacent land uses. These uses consist of other industrial buildings in the industrial park, and an office park and a City of Kent park across the river. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site along the river. 3. The project will promote economic development in the City, enhance the stability of the levee on the landward side through the addition of fill, and will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. 4. There are no culturally significant features on the site. Development of the site will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. 5. Public access is available on the opposite side of the river from this project on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: A. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. B. No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; C. The project will not disrupt existing trees or vegetation within the river environment. No cottonwood trees within the river environment or low impact environment will be removed. c : \carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 10 .. �': L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit D. No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be discharged into the P17 drainage basin. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be used to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. E. All state and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. F. Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project G. All necessary permits will be obtained for this project. H. No dredging or mining will occur with the project. I. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. J. No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. Landscaping, as required by this section, is being provided at the edge of the river environment consisting of Honey Locust trees and native grass. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment provided item 8.B. is complied with. A. The structure is sited according to the Heavy Industrial zone in which it is located. Landscaping is provided according to the requirements of that zone, with 12.5 feet in the front as well as some landscaping on the sides adjacent to entrances to the offices. No landscaping is proposed in the rear, except for the landscaping along the river environment. This landscaping consists of honey locust trees located 30 feet on center with native grass planted in a five foot area just outside both the River Environment and 30 foot easement dedicated to King County for maintenance of the levee. B. Parking, loading and storage facilities will be screened from the river in the following ways: a cyclone fence with slats will run the length of the western side of the site and then easterly along the river for approximately 450 feet to a gate that will prevent access to the rear of the building from the west, except for emergency vehicles. Honey locust trees and native grass will be planted just outside the River Environment. No information was submitted on the need for the entire area shown on the landscaping plan to be paved surface. Additional landscaping will be required in the low impact environment adjacent to the river environment and along the southwest portion of the building in areas that do not need to be used for vehicle access. This will reduce the amount of impervious surface and minimize the visual and physical impact of the building on the shoreline. The addition of this landscaping provides an opportunity to reduce the impacts of this development on a shoreline of the state. C. No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Comments were received from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, King County Water and Land Resources Division and an adjacent property owner on the project during the Notice of Application comment period. Issues raised by these comments were addressed in the SEPA staff report. The Corps has no objections to this project. 10. A determination of non - significance was issued on April 23, 1999; no appeals were received by the May 7, 1999 deadline. c: \carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 11 L99 -0006: Segale Business Park Building 981 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the shoreline substantial development permit with the following condition: 1. Additional landscaping shall be provided in the Low Impact Environment in the general areas indicated on Attachment C such that emergency vehicle and normal truck operations are not impeded. c : \carol\segale\shorerpt.doc 12 City of Tukwila Department of CiaffigiVigifiOpment pri123, 1999 To: Steve Lancaster, Director tit Fm: Carol Lumb, Associate planner • John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Re: Project File No. E99 -0003: Segale Business Park Warehouse /Office Building Project Description: Construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt-up building within 200 feet of the Green River. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs along the riverward side of the site. Proponent: LaPianta Limited Partnership dba Segale Business Park Location: 5801 through 6199 Segale Park Drive "C" Date prepared: April, 1999 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development. Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) J U; ;U :cow: J lL,• wO g. u.< =a �w • i.- w w` .0 • ;. 0 Hi ''I w' U` • ui • • H- Z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse /Office Building April23, 1999 Existing Environmental Information: • EIS for Segale Business Park, 1974 • Geotechnical Report (12/22/98, 4/15/99) and Levee Seepage Evaluation (3/10/99): Geo Engineers, Inc. • Traffic Study (1/99): David I. Hamlin and Associates, Inc. • Drainage Control Report: Layton & Sell, Inc. 4/15/99 Comments on SEPA Checklist: Page 5. #5b. Since the time the SEPA checklist was prepared, the Puget Sound Chinook salmon has been listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service as a threatened species. This species is found in the Green River. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth The soils at the proposed building site are silty sands and gravels. Prior to preloading of the building footprint, the existing ground surface ranged from. approximately 24 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL) at the east end of the site to about 60 feet above MSL at the top of a soil stockpile on the west end. The top of the levee is at an approximate elevation of 33 feet above MSL. The 60 -foot soil stockpile has been spread across the proposed building footprint area for the purpose of preloading the site in preparation of constructing the building. The finished grades of the site are expected to be: the landward side of the levee will be graded to a 2:1 slope with the toe of the slope at elevation 29 feet above MSL; from the top of the slope, the area will be graded to a finish elevation of 27 feet above MSL in the parking area. The site will gently rise to a finish elevation of 28 feet above MSL at the building foundation. As part of the shoreline permit process, the applicant was required to submit a geotechnical analysis showing that the integrity of the levee was not going to be compromised by the proposed project. The analysis was to focus on the possibility of seepage and piping. The March 10, 1999 Levee Seepage Evaluation prepared by GeoEngineers determined that a small amount of seepage from the levee would likely occur during the 100 -year storm event. However, the evaluation states that the seepage would likely.be small and normal site drainage would adequately remove the water. Further, the Levee c: \taro USegale/se pa -rp t z ▪ Z. 0 0` N U: CO w W= w• 0. 2 g a. D. 11.1 . z� 0: Z~ 0 0— :. O ww F- F; LL- 0: ui z N O . z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse/Office Building April23, 1999 • Seepage Evaluation indicated that for the soil conditions encountered at the building site, foundation seepage and uplift pressures would not pose a risk to the stability of the levee and would not cause soil piping. These issues were addressed during an April 16, 1999 meeting with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, King County Water and Land Resources Division, City of Tukwila and the applicant present. Based upon this meeting, the Corps of Engineers stated in an April 20, 1999 letter that the project is acceptable as designed. \.. z I- z re 11.1 O 0 U) 0: cn w w I J f.- w0 The County's letter, dated April 16, 1999 commenting on the project requests 2 that: ti.. a • Sufficient site area be preserved to permit establishing an overall slope co a = gradient of 2:1 on the riverward side of the levee should there be an Z I, opportunity to reconstruct the levee in the future; and 1— 0 • Sufficient area be preserved to provide for establishment of a 15 -foot z F- : wide levee maintenance access roadway along the top crest of the levee 2 • o slope. ,0 a al— Based on the information presented by the applicant and the most recent ;w w comments provided by the COE, it appears that the stability of the levee is not w an issue for this project and that sufficient area exists currently to access the z levee for maintenance. , Cu U co 1= H O Building, parking lot, driveways and sidewalks will cover approximately 85% of z the site. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be installed to control storm water prior to discharge into existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed as a requirement of the construction. Air Normal emissions and dust associated with use of construction equipment will occur during construction of the project. After construction, normal exhaust associated with vehicular traffic will occur. Water trucks will be used during construction. All equipment will meet local, state, and federal emission standards. Water The Green River abuts the site on the south and east sides of the project site. The project is subject to the State Shoreline Management Act since landscaping 3 �.__.___ c: \caroUSegale/sepa -rpt � SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse /Office Building April23, 1999 and portions of the building, driveways and parking areas will be within 200 feet of the shoreline. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water, nor will there be any surface water or ground water withdrawals or diversions. The project site does not lie within a 100 -year floodplain. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters will occur. The office /warehouse will be connected to the City of Tukwila's sewage system. • z ,_~ w re 6 m. U0 cn w W =, J F—. Runoff from the parking areas and building roof will be collected in onsite catch ` w.0 basins and flow by gravity to the existing City of Tukwila storm water system. 1 5. The site is within the P -17 basin. Oil/water separators will be installed on site to ° minimize water quality impacts from parking areas. = C� • _` z�.: Plants w f- ut No vegetation currently exists on the site as the site has been used for a large v • soil stockpile. Landscaping will be provided at the front of the site and around ,p H; portions of the building. Landscaping will be planted landward of the levee w W within the Low Impact Environment of the Shoreline, as required by the r-7 . Tukwila Shoreline Overlay District. LL. • •w O The King County Water and Land Resources Division provided the following comment on landscaping of the site: • All landscaping plantings should be consistent with cross section dimensions and construction details and policies set forth in Corps of Engineers' Publication EM 1110 -2 -301, dated February 28, 1999. In the meeting held on April 16, 1999, the COE stated that grass should be planted on the riverward side of the levee and that at some future time, willows or other trees would be planted on the riverward side, should there be a need to reconstruct the levee. Currently, no room exists for a landscape bench on the riverward side of the levee. The COE expressed concerns about the type of tree proposed for the landscape area at the landward toe of the levee; as a result, the tree type has been revised from a cedar to a locust tree. This type of tree has been approved by the COE. Animals The SEPA Checklist notes that songbirds, ducks, crows and Canadian geese have been observed on or near the site. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway migration route, The only mammals observed on the site have been c:\caro USegale/sepa -rpt 4 .:. .�. z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse /Office Building April23, 1999 rodents. While the Checklist states that no fish have been observed, the National Marine Fisheries Service has recently listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. This species is known to inhabit the Green River. The King County Water and Land Resources Division provided the following comment: • To the extent that construction, excavation, and/or landscape plantings may be proposed within the existing River Protection Easement for the levee, it would appear the project proposal is clearly subject to the provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act. Federal agencies are required to consult for any action that "will likely affect" a listed species. Currently, there are no local, State or Federal regulations that require revisions to this project related to the ESA. Energy/Natural Resources Electricity and natural gas will be used in the building for heating, manufacturing and other uses normal for warehousing and offices. Diesel fuel will be used in construction equipment during construction. The project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. The building will be designed to meet the Washington State Energy Code to save energy in heating and cooling the structure. Environmental Health No special emergency services will be required as a result of the proposed project. Noise is generated by traffic along the street in front of the site and the close proximity of an asphalt plant to the west. Construction noise will occur during regular hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Noise from vehicles and trucks once the building is open for business, approximately 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. All equipment will be operated with required local, state, and federal noise suppression devices. Land/Shoreline Uses The site has been used as a storage yard for Seattle Tractor Company and stockpile area for excess pitrun material. To the west is an asphalt plant, north is a street and various warehouses and office buildings. The Green River and COE Section 205 levee border the site on the south and east. A carpenter's shop, 5 c: \carp USegale/sepa -rpt • w 6 U O. wi J F— w O. g- u. ¢' =d I-- Ill _.. z� I-0 Z w w D �p O N' CI wuj WZ W z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse /Office Building April23, 1999 which currently exists on the site, will be demolished prior to construction of the warehouse /office building. The site is designated Heavy Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned Heavy Industrial. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban and the proposal must obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development permit. Approximately 40 -75 people will work on the site when the project is constructed. Housing No housing exists on the site. Aesthetics The type of construction proposed for the building is tilt up concrete. The project is subject to design review and will be considered by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. The maximum height of the building in the shoreline area is 35 feet. The building is proposed to be 33 feet. Light/Glare The building will have exterior lighting, which will occur from dusk to dawn. No anticipated glare from the building is anticipated. Recreation A pedestrian/bike trail system exists on the opposite side of the Green River. Sidewalks will be provided along the street frontage of the building to link it with the sidewalks in the Business Park to provide safe access to the Green River trail system. As part of the project, an outside picnic area will be provided for employees of the warehouse /office building. Historic /Cultural Preservation There are no places or objects listed on or proposed for national state or local preservation registers. c:\caroVSegale/sepa-rpt 6 z 6 D 0 UO CO 0 vo W =. W 0. g< _ z� o 0; 0—'. 13 ! W w LI 0 wz to Z ~O ~ ,. z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse /Office Building April23, 1999 Transportation A Traffic Impact Analysis was provided as part of the project submittal. Direct access to the site is via Segale Park Drive "C ", which is part of the private, internal road system within the Segale Business Park. Transit service is available on South 180t Street, approximately one -half mile from the project site. Sidewalks will be provided along the frontage of the project, which will connect with the existing sidewalks throughout the business park. Bicycle and vehicle parking will be provided on site as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project indicates that approximately 20% of the trips generated by the development will occur during the AM and PM peak hours. Many of the trips generated by the project will be trucks, because the project is a warehouse with related office uses. The Traffic Impact Analysis notes that the Trip Generation Manual does not provide data as to percentage of total trips that will be heavy vehicles. It notes, however, that the percentage of trucks is probably higher during the non -peak hours when deliveries typically occur and when fewer employees would be travelling. A comment letter was received from a business in the Segale Business Park concerned about the additional truck traffic on Segale Park Drive "C" and the ability of employees, customers etc. to access the arterial highways that serve Tukwila. The new traffic generated by the development of the property will be distributed onto the adjacent roadway system and then onto the regional transportation system SR -518, I -5, I -405 and towards the major arterials such as West Valley Highway or South 180t Street. The trip distribution information indicates that trips will be fairly evenly distributed on the surrounding streets. The applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis identifies ten locations in the vicinity of the project that are scheduled for capital improvements and the estimated number of trips from the site that would be traveling through these locations during the PM peak hour. The trip mitigation fees required by City code for trips through these locations have been estimated by the Traffic Impact Analysis as approximately $74,447. Public Services The development of this site as a warehouse /office building will generate an increased need for public services such as police and fire. 7 c: \caroUSegale/sepa -rpt • SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Warehouse/Office Building April 23, 1999 Utilities Utilities currently available at the site include electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, storm water and sanitary sewer. No additional utilities are anticipated to be needed as a result of the building construction. Recommendation Determination of Nonsignificance 8 c:lcaro l/Segale/sepa -cpt g,.. 0 0. • l .V/ WI; N LL'' O! •z, .• F=O • •W wi• Uq 'SON; • = V; 4 - W • ‘U= • • O F": 04/19/1999 16: 00 206-205 34 • . : • April 16, 1999 • Steve Lancaster Page Three • • • • KC WLRD RIVERS C. PAGE 04 Based on review of the site plans and cross section drawings submitted to date, it is my sincere beUef that difficult decisions wilt need to be made by the City to accomplish the forgoing recommendations. At an absolute minimum, it appears that an additional fifteen feet of site area along the river frontage will need to be dedicated as an easement for the purposes of providing for adequate levee stability.. This may also address both site level and reach level impacts related to ESA concerns with levees as they may affect the listed species. It is my belief such measures are reasonably necessary as conditions of approval for issuance of the subject permits. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please call me 206-296-8388 if you have any concerns or questions with this letter. • Sincerely, Dave Clark, Manager Rivers Section Cc: Debbie Arima, Assistant Manager, WLR Division Sarah Ogler, Program Coordinator, Green River Basin Program Andy Levesque, Senior Engineer Carol Lumb, Planner, City of Tukwila Phil Frasier, Senior Engineer Noel Gilbrough, Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Paul Komoroske, Emergency Operations Branch Monte Kaiser, Geotechnical Branch z .< • uj2 -Jo. ' 'cow LIi ico a: u, F., a '2 D; •:D Cf• • A) (ii•. ,!0•7-`. 10 ..• uf:, M•c.);, 17:1 0!. Z., • • .0 • .1— F.. :Z • 10JR PACKAG /tiG CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 SouthCenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 Attn: Steve Lancaster, Director Dear Mr. Lancaster, RECE \ /ED APR 0 9 1999 C0 i►uUr�TY OPMENT P.O. BOX 58468 SEATTLE, WA 98138 -1468 TEL. 206 -575 -4260 FAX 206 - 5750640 April 6t, 1999 This letter is in reference to the proposal to construct a 313,735 square foot building at 5801 through 6199 Segale Park Drive "C" Tukwila, WA. I note that the proposed building has 50 overhead shipping doors, that to me would indicate a large daily amounts of truck traffic. Our building is located directly North of the proposed building, at the junction of "B" and "C" streets. I am obviously concerned about this additional traffic. My area of concern is two fold. First is obviously safety. There are stop signs located on "0" street with one at the junction of "B" and "C." . Very few people obey them! There will be a serious accident at this junction one day! The advent of numerous trucks daily now traversing this intersection from this new building scares me. My second concern is the ability of traffic (employees, customers, and suppliers) to gain access to the arterial highways. Currently there are 3 exit routes from the Segale Business Park. Directly North on Andover Park West to connect with I -5 North to Seattle or South to Federal Way and Tacoma. At peak time 3:30pm to 6:OOpm traffic is bottle - necked at South Center Parkway. Attempting to get on 1-5. The SouthCenter hill is a gridlock during peak times. This is also the route taken for junction to 405 N to Renton and Bellevue, again it is gridlock. Now lets look at the traffic going Southbound I -5. With the current closure of 200 St. [till November 1999???] traffic now heads West on 180th and goes up the steep hill at 178th to Military road. Again this is no picnic but probably is the best of the 3 exit routes. Finally we have the traffic heading to Kent and Southbound on Highway 167. Believe it or not this is worse that the SouthCenter hill. Most day's traffic is backed up from West Valley Highway to Andover Park West. CANS • CROWNS ATTACHMENT E • CLOSURES • MACHINERY For the afore mentioned reasons I feel the additional truck traffic is going to cause chaos around the South area of SouthCenter. It is my understanding that a tragic survey was completed in conjunction with the project perhaps I could receive a copy of it! Sincer ly ours, /i1 (111 Michael T Plan Corm- A. Nichols Segale Inc. 04/01/99 13:54 FAX 206 7E )319 REPLY TO ATTENTION OR EMERG MGM'T DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX. 3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124-2255 Emergency Management Branch Mr. Dave Clark Manager, Rivers Section King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98104 -5022 Dear Mr. Clark: 29 March 1999 Lj002 Thank you for affording us the opportunity to review the proposed warehouse building development to be located immediately adjacent to the authorized levee at the Segale Business Park in Tukwila, Washington. We have reviewed the proposed project and have concerns about features that could impact the integrity of the existing structure. The Segale levee is part of the Federally authorized flood control project that was mostly constructed by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers and turned over to the City of Tukwila on May 15, 1992, following a joint final inspection. The proposal to excavate below existing grade immediately landward of the levee toe has some serious ramifications associated with it. This work could cause piping or uplift pressures on the soils that could possibly lead to levee failures. The report written by GeoEngineers and dated March 1999 is not completely in agreement with a similar report written by Shannon and Wilson and dated June 1995. GeoEngineers' analysis indicates that foundation seepage and uplift pressures will not pose a risk to the stability of the levee and will not likely cause soil piping. Shannon and Wilson's conclusions indicated that while the anticipated seepage rates are considered low to moderate, the high total head under the landward toe of the levee will cause the unit to virtually become "quick." The soils in the area for the proposed warehouse project and those in the vicinity of Shannon and Wilson's. study are similar enough to cause concerns that this same condition may well occur if the excavation at the toe of the levee is allowed. ATTACHMENT D -1 04/01/99 13 :54 FAX 206 7 , 3319 FNF.RG MGMT•_•. •._ 1 Cj 003 • • There also appears to be a discrepancy between the 100 year flood level shown on the warehouse drawings and the 100 year flood stage calculated by the Corps of Engineers. Of more concern is the Standard Project Flood (SPF) level that determines our design and construction of these types of .projects. Any work that impacts this levee should be based on the SPF level rather than the 100 year level. Based on data furnished by our Hydraulics and Hydrology Section, the SPF level at the upstream end of the proposed project is at elevation 31.65 feet MSL and 31.00 feet MSL at the downstream end. Based on these elevations, areas in the upstream end of the proposed project will be lower than the SPF and with the uncertainty of whether or not the levee and landward side toe will be stable during a flood event, the proposed grading plan is a' serious concern to us. One possible solution to this problem would be to raise the overall grade of the warehouse about one and one half foot above the current proposed project. This would ensure that if the levee did fail during an SPF the flood waters would be contained within the project boundaries. If you have any questions please contact Bill •Garrott at (206) 764 -3406 or Monte Kaiser at (206) 764 -3712. Sincerely, ul E. Kdmoroske, P.E. Chief,' Emergency Management Branch OTT's' OF TUKWILA •DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOAL: CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 300,000 SO FT BUILDING TO.BE USED FOR WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE. PROPONENT: LA PIANTA LTD PARTNERSHIP.— LOCATION OF PROPOSAL. INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: ',SDI SFGALE PARK DR C PARCEL NO: 745'7'7404-9018 SEC/TWN/RNG: SE 35-23-04 •, • LEAD AGENCY:.. CITY OF TUKWILA The ,City ha 4etermined that the proposal does not have .:-.a prob4le • sianificant •4verse impact on rhe envi-ronment. An environmental mpact statement, (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)CO). This deCision-Was made after revtew of :a. completed enVironmentaj .:cheoklist and other information cu file, with the lead agency_ This Irformation is' available to the public. on request. *.A.**************Ack**A***.i.*****A******Ak**.k.A************k*kkA.** -2 4 u 4 etermlnatiOh is fin a al and signed this C1S4A day of • .199 -,teve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98133 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals'are available with the .DePartMent of Community Development. ATTACHMENT H . Notes from"4/22/99 GRBTC by Phil Fraser Andy Levesque: Segale Shannon & Wilson Report: - Applicants seepage analysis - corps in agrement not adversly affect property Z - landowner does not wish to do slope stability analysis, KC is pursuing w/ S & W 2 - KC's request: slolpe stability which translates to 2:1 slope w /15' mid bench -I 0, 0 O; CO 0 - KC's position: plans should be consistent w/ corps guidlines CO = In I- - There is a nexus to a future acrtion which must be addressed by Corps as part of this N �" development process" 2 O. Phil: - The City is in receipt of the letter and memorandum from the CORPS and letter from u.. <, KC = d W - The levee on Segale Property is a certified CORPS levee with an existing (30') easement Z =—! I=0. Z - The developmeent has be reviewed by both CORPS & KC. W 0' - PW Director has reviewed information and finds a case for levee instability has not been made 0 'O 0 1-" W: - The PW Director and DCD Director have discussed this matter. The DCD Director is now H V! w 0 - O Z on I - We understand that KC is conducting further S & W riverbank stability analysis due out 0 N' in the next couple of weeks and invite KC, if they see cause, to provide input during the appeals period (for environmental) Z to date. (letter alludes to "may be ") pursuing the environemntal and land use processes. (Andy said after meemg to Phil that KC will not respond. Andy feels original S & W report makes this case (also sent to CORPS) Noel Gilbrow: - CORPS has discussed this w /Andy and does not agree on riverbank instability position Andy's taken - Corps believes the development project improves the stability of levee - Corps will repair levee, but expects City (via. KC) to carry out "normal maintenance" of levee. In response to "What is considered "normal maintenance" Noel said, cutting of the grass, and the like, but not repair. P v c� N.A5 j %3• ! L\1 f s Nu . C i'< s:1 A.9 04/20/99 15:37 FAX 2 ,784 3319 F.MERG 3[G3'l DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTL-E CI5TR[CT. CORPS OF EN01NE9RS P.O. BOX 3795 $CATT1.6. WA8HINGTorI De124-2254 Emergency Management Branch Mr. Dave Clark Manager, Rivers Section King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98104 -5022 Dear Mr. Clark: APR 20 A - `J` \JOQ� Thank you for attending the meeting on April 6, 1999, regarding the prior determination for the proposed warehouse building development to be located immediately adjacent to • the authorized levee at the Segale Business Park in Tukwila, Washington. After initial review of the proposed project we Bent you a letter; dated. March 29, 1999, which stated our • concerns about features that could impact the integrity of the existing structure. Upon further review and discussions ••at the meeting we find the.•project to be acceptable as designed. Acceptable vegetation for the landward toe of the levee includes the locust trees that were proposed. If you have any questions. please contact Bi11 Garrott at (206) 764 -3406, or Monte Kaiser at (206) 764 -3712. Sincerely, aul E. Kottforoske, P. Chief, Emergency Management Branch ATTACHMENT D -2 002 SEGALE BUSINESS PARK MEMORANDUM z DATE: 4/19/99 ,. `, T. k. w ce 0.J DO, 0 0 co CI; CO LIJ: ILI I. ,.....1 1—, 0 -J u. a cic3„ i; 1_0; z I—. ILI ,2 D. .D CY 0 co; A 14" 33'-0" 88 3/8" x 50" x 45 1/2" !01—; al.r Wi B 14" 33'-5" 88 3/8" x 50"x 45 1/2" C 14" 34'-2 3/8" 24'-1 3/8"x 7'-6 Y2" x 6'-9 5/8" , 0 ..... i- D 14" 33'-5" 88 3/8"x 50" x 45 V2" 0 , E 14" 34'-0" 148 Y2" x 104 Y2" x 60" TO: Carol Lumb — City of Tukwila FROM: Steve SUBJECT: Roof top HVAC equipment CC: Facia elevation: 33'-8 1/8" Section Curb height Roof Elev. Size RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIU\ APR 2 1 1999 PERMIT CENTER ''04./19%1999 16:00 206 -205 -51134 Tina County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 (206) 296 -88i9 (206) 296.0192 FAX April 16, 1999 Mr. Steve Lancaster Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 02 RE: Review of Application: La Planta Limited Partnership d.b.a. Seale Business Park Tukwila Fite Nos. L99 -0006; L99 -0007; E99 -0003 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject application for construction of Building No. 981, proposed for construction within the Segale Business Park in the City of Tukwila. King County has a significant interest in this application, as the proposed site development plan may potentially affect the county's maintenance and repair obligations regarding the eXisting flood containment levee along the Green River at the project site. King County is party to a June 30, 1992 Green River Basin Program Interlocal Agreement with the City of Tukwila and other Green River Valley Cities in which King County has agreed to maintain levees, riverbanks, and revetments within the Green River Flood Control Zone District (GRFCZD). To this end, King County in 1991 assigned its River Protection Easement rights to the City of Tukwila as a tenant in common, in order to facilitate Tukwila's completion of the federally authorized Lower Green River Flood Control Project with the Corps of Engineers. This easement encumbers portions of the project site within thirty feet of the top -of -bank along the riverward edge of the existing levee crest. This easement width was established in 1964, and may not be adequate to today's continuing flood protection needs. In addition to completion of their Section 205 levee - raising initiative at the site, the Corps has also accomplished a Public Law 84.99 levee repair to 700 feet of the levee system within the Segale Business Park in 1990, with King County as the Local Sponsor. In 1991, King County and the Corps cooperated in an Emergency Flood Fight along 2000 feet of the landward levee toe. In 1993, King County and the City of Tukwila signed a further interlocal agreement to cost share the local sponsors' portion of funding for completion of a federal Hazard Mitigation Grant Program project to stabilize 900 feet of the riverward levee slopes and relieve seepage hazards along 1200 feet of the landward levee toe within the Segale Business Park. This work was completed in 1997. An additional 80 feet of emergency seepage control work was performed by King County in 1995, within the downstream portions of the project site which is the subject of the present application. Much of the seepage control work and emergency response efforts accomplished at the Segale Business Park has required work outside the width provided in the 1964 easements. A Permanent Right of Access, extending some twenty feet landward of the historic easements, was needed to allow for this work. This additional interest in the affected property has been obtained by agreement with the landowner. No such agreement has yet been reached within the site area now subject to this present application. ti z 6 • - . '00. CO 0 taU11 J H U) w" w� N a. = w" z� F- O 2 01 •w~ D p: N' • w w. U; ~O ui 2: .O•.! z • €4/1911999 16:00 206 - 205 -5134 April 16, 1999 Steve Lancaster Page Two KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 03 The total cost for construction of these levee repairs within the Segale Business Park over the last ten years has easily exceeded $2 Million. King County has significant concerns with this level of continuing expense and respectfully requests the City of Tukwila's careful consideration of the site plan review to include reasonably prudent measures assuring the future integrity and stability of the levee system within the project site. Specific measures reasonably necessary to this end are requested as follows: 1. Sufficient site area needs to be preserved free from excavation, grading, landscape plantings, and other site improvements so as to facilitate King County's continuing abilities to accomplish future levee repairs designed at stable angles of repose for the affected levee slopes along the riverbank. Based on discussions with the property owner to date, no independent analyses of riverbank stability have been performed. King County has contracted for geotechnical consultant studies utilizing soils information provided by the applicant to address this concern. Results of these analyses should be forthcoming with detailed site recommendations within the next few weeks. Relying for the moment on findings developed by these same county consultants for downstream portions of the levee system within the Segale Business Park, and also for levee reaches immediately across the river from the project site, it is my recommendation this allowance be predicated on establishing an overall slope gradient of ZH:1 V, or two horizontal feet to each vertical foot of levee slope elevation above the river bed. 2. Sufficient site area needs be preserved free from site grading, site improvements, and landscape plantings to provide for establishment of a 15- foot -wide levee maintenance access roadway along the top crest of the levee slope, consistent with a top -of -bank location predicated on stable slope angles determined pursuant to (1), above. 3. All landscape plantings should be consistent with cross section dimensions and construction details and policies set forth in Corps of Engineers' Publication EM 11102 -301, dated February 28, 1999. This is especially important with regard to King County's continuing ability to maintain the levee system in accordance with applicable regulatory standards affecting levees. See also (4), below. 4. To the extent that construction, excavation, and /or landscape plantings may be proposed within the existing River Protection Easement for the levee, it would appear the project proposal is clearly subject to the provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) with respect to recent listing of Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. The City of Tukwila may need to consider if site review is consistent with its recent statements conceming programmatic certification under the ESA's required 4(d) Rule. Similarly, the City may need to request that the Corps consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to ensure compliance with requirements established in Section 7 of the ESA. ■ 04/19/1999 16:00 206 -20L 434 April 16, 1999 • Steve Lancaster Page Three KC WLRD RIVER:. EC. PAGE 04 Based on review of the site plans and cross section drawings submitted to date, it is my sincere belief that difficult decisions will need to be made by the City to accomplish the forgoing recommendations. At an absolute minimum, it appears that an additional fifteen feet of site area along the river frontage will need to be dedicated as an easement for the•purposes of providing for adequate levee stability., This may also address both site level and reach level impacts related to ESA concerns with levees as they may affect the listed species. It is my belief such measures are reasonably necessary as conditions of approval for issuance of the subject permits. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please call me 206 -296 -8388 if you have any concerns or questions with this letter. • Sincerely, Dave Clark, Manager Rivers Section Cc: Debbie Arima, Assistant. Manager, WLR Division Sarah Ogler, Program Coordinator, *Green River Basin Program Andy Levesque, Senior Engineer Carol Lumb, Planner, City of Tukwila Phil Frasier, Senior Engineer Noel Gilbrough, Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Paul Komoroske, Emergency Operations Branch Monte Kaiser, Geotechnical Branch APR -16 -99 FRI 03 34 PM USArE\ SEATTLE DISTRICT FAX NO, 206 764 4470 P, 02/03 CENPS -PM -CP April 16, 1999 z ,_~ MEMORANDUM POR RECORD e LI SUI3JECT: Segale Business Park (SBP) Proposed Development, Corps, Tukwila, King County o o. SBP Meeting. N W w= J H N LL W O: 2. The two major issues that were discussed were: a. Concerns dealing with the ability of the • D existing structure to keep flood waters out of the rest of the project area and the stability of the D. w tu existing levee prism. and b. concerns dealing with the planting of large trees in or adjacent to the z i. levee prism. z O w uj 3. In discussions dealing with the ability of the existing project to contain flood waters we D O determined that if there where a levee failure in the vicinity of the loading dock the high ground 0 0 both up and downstream of the possible break would contain the floodwaters within the w i—• development arca. We discussed the current 1.7 to 1 front slope on the existing levee and the 0. recommendation of the County's consultant that the slope be 2 to 1. Corps staff said that they were p' aware that it would be better if the slope were 2 to 1 but we would continue to repair flood damage W N z ,.v to this structure with the steeper slope, i= - O 1. The subject meeting was attended by those on the attached list. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss issues dealing with the subject proposal. 4. In the discussions of large trees corps staff said that we could live with the proposed trees at this site in the location specified but we might have a problem with trees being proposed for a project just upstream of this site. SBP personnel said that they would propose to the corps another tree. 5. Actions following this meeting will be for SBP staff to provide a tree proposal to the Corps by Monday morning and the Corps action is to provide a letter to Segale approving the business park design. 6. Just after the end of this meeting Corps personnel were told that there might be a Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act issue dealing with this project. District Council was not available for consultation to determine if we are. As soon as we get a reading on this we will let the attendees know. cc: Attendees Soule /PM -CP Scuderi /F.0 -TB -ER 1 a �v -P-.t -• 04/1971999 16:00 206-205-5134 April 16, 1999 • Steve Lancaster Page Three KC WLRD RIVERS SEC. PAGE 04 Based on review of the site plans and cross section drawings submitted to date, it is my sincere belief that difficult decisions will need to be made by the City to accomplish the forgoing recommendations. At an absolute minimum, it appears that an additional fifteen feet of site area along the river frontage will need to be dedicated as an easement for the purposes of providing for adequate levee stability. This may also address both site level and reach level impacts related to ESA concerns with levees as they may affect the listed species. It is my belief such measures are reasonably necessary as conditions of approval for issuance of the subject permits. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please call me 206 -296 -8388 if you have any concerns or questions with this letter. Sincerely, Dave Clark, Manager Rivers Section Cc: Debbie Arima, Assistant Manager, WLR Division Sarah Ogler, Program Coordinator, 'Green River Basin Program Andy Levesque, Senior Engineer Carol Lumb, Planner, City of Tukwila Phil Frasier, Senior Engineer Noel Gilbrough, Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Paul Komoroske, Emergency Operations Branch Monte Kaiser, Geotechnical Branch • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director April 7, 1999 Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: Building 981, Segale Business Park (L99 -0006, Design Review, L99 -0007, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, E99 -0003 SEPA) Dear Mr. Nelson: Staff from the Departments of Community Development and Public Works have reviewed the plans submitted for the new office /warehouse building in the Segale Business Park, Building 981. We have the following comments or questions about the project: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 1. TMC 18.44.130 B.3. provides suggested types of trees to use in the River Environment. However, based on comments we have received on other shoreline permits reviewed by the Department of Ecology, the landscaping between the building and the shoreline should be native plant materials. The landscape plan should be revised accordingly. 2. The Low Impact Environment in the shoreline area includes environmentally protected lands. Areas on the east and south sides of the building apparently are not needed for parking or circulation based on the site plan. Therefore these areas should be landscaped with appropriate native plant materials. Please see the attached plan for the areas in question. 3. Please identify on the site plan, shoreline substantial development permit survey, landscape plan and the utilities plan the 30 -foot easement area that has been granted to King County. 4. Please submit a Utility Permit Application in order to expedite storm drainae review. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 Z re w J U: 00: W w; w =. J 1. w 0. v. Z F. 1- 0 Z 1-. 11J uj • o: • to 'O —.. 0 1- = U: 1- 11-- O Z I Off' z Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Building 981 April 7, 1999 Design Review Criteria Landscape Plan 1. The landscape plan must be revised to provide a landscape island on the eastern side of the site in the parking area. For developments with more than 40 parking stalls, the required amount of interior landscape area is 12 square feet per parking stall with landscape islands sized at a minimum of 100 square feet. Building Design TMC 18.60.050 provides the criteria used by the Board of Architectural Review when it reviews projects. Comments 1 -3 below are based on the following BAR guidelines: "18.60.050 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged.... d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; 3. Building Design. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure... g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest." Some aspects of the project's design may not fully meet these criteria. While there may be many alternative ways of meeting these criteria, comments 1 -3 below provide several suggestions for improving the design of the proposed project. We would be happy to meet with you to discuss these comments and alternatives you may have to meeting the BAR criteria. c: \carol\segale\nelson -1.doc 2 z �z w U O' U 0 W z' w • O Q: =d z� I—o Z I- o 0- 0 H: ww ti 0. _z ui ,U2: 0I z Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Building 981 April 7, 1999 1. Awnings of the same material and color as on the rest of the building, should be applied to all building entrances to provide visual cues to pedestrians and vehicles. 2. The darker hue color used for the awnings, reveal lines and medallions should also be continued at the ground level of the building to anchor the building. 3. On the east and south elevations, the building modulations are not as symmetrical as the west and north elevations. Several walls have one row of reveal lines that appear incongruous when compared to the adjacent walls with windows and reveal lines above and below the window treatment. Please either add another row of reveal lines on the walls and medallions on the columns or provide some other consistent treatment such as adding window areas on all the walls. 4. There does not appear to be an area designated for collection of recyclable materials and garbage. TMC 18.52.080 and 18.52.090 (attached) establish the standards for amount of area to be set aside and the required screening. 5. The building elevations do not indicate whether any mechanical equipment will be installed on the roof. Any mechanical equipment on the roof must be screened from view, setback 10 feet from the edge of the roof and do not exceed 20 feet in height. 6. The plans do not indicate what signage is proposed for the building. Signage is reviewed and approved by the Board of Architectural Review along with the building design and landscaping plan. On- premises permanent signs located in the shoreline zone and specifically oriented to be visible from the "river environment" are not permitted. General Site Plan and Infrastructure 1. The submitted conceptual storm drainage plans do not include provisions for "storage, or detention." The schematic storm drainage plans may not comply with the City's drainage ordinance. The City's drainage ordinance requires compliance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. These regulations will likely require modification of the proposed drainage improvements. Storm water detention and water quality treatment is required. Siting these storm water facilities may affect the proposed site plan. 2. A certificate of water availability from Highline Water District is required. A copy of the certificate is enclosed Miscellaneous 1. The notices sent to the following property owners were returned by the Post Office: The Box Maker (6230 South 190th Street, Kent, WA 98032); Schoenbachler Enterprises Lic (13256 Northup Way #11, Bellevue, WA 98005): Keyston Brothers (18301 Andover Park West, Tukwila, WA 98188); and Bruce & Elizabeth Mitchell (19000 57`" Place NE, Seattle, WA 98155). Please provide corrected mailing labels for these addresses, as we want to make sure they receive subsequent mailings. c:\carol\segale\nelson-l.doc 3 Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Building 981 April 7, 1999 You have been faxed a copy of the comments the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has provided to King County on the proposed excavation behind the levee. Given the issues raised by this letter as well as the Corps, the earliest this project can be scheduled for BAR review is May 27, 1999. Scheduling this project for BAR review will depend on how quickly the issues raised are responded to. These issues should be responded to no later than April 30, 1999 to ensure a May 24, 1999 public hearing in order to allow time for the issuance of the environmental determination, the shoreline permit, preparation of the BAR staff report and issuing the required public notice. We are expecting comments from Andy Levesque, from King County Surface Water Management, on this project on April 19, 1999. As soon as those comments are received, they will be faxed to you. I understand that he will be providing comments, in part, on the landscaping in the 30 -foot easement area granted to King County. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, CaGit cJ- Carol Lumb Associate Planner Enclosures cc: Steve Lancaster, Director, Planning and Community Development Department Jack Pace, Planning Manager Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works Department Joanna Spencer, Associate Engineer, Public Works Department c: \carol\segale\nelson- l .doc 4 .. , :. :� w 2 D 00 CO CO CI w WI —JI- M W O'. LL zj—iu qq J21 ' W W n p LL 1p Z 1- '. '= , I 0 Z. �OJR PaCh(gG /AG rn • v 0 1— k R �F QJ CROWN CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 SouthCenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 Attn: Steve Lancaster, Director Dear Mr. Lancaster, 11 r. 7—) - ; n Ir'::!-.1 P.O. BOX 58468 SEATTLE, WA 98138 -1468 TEL. 206-575-4260 FAX 206 - 5750640 April 6t, 1999 This letter is in reference to the proposal to construct a 313,735 square foot building at 5801 through 6199 Segale Park Drive "C" Tukwila, WA. I note that the proposed building has 50 overhead shipping doors, that to me would indicate a large daily amounts of truck traffic. Our building is located directly North of the proposed building, at the junction of "B" and "C" streets. I am obviously concerned about this additional traffic. My area of concern is two fold. First is obviously safety. There are stop signs located on "C" street with one at the junction of "B" and "C." Very few people obey them! There will be a serious accident at this junction one day! The advent of numerous trucks daily now traversing this intersection from this new building scares me. My second concern is the ability of traffic (employees, customers, and suppliers) to gain access to the arterial highways. Currently there are 3 exit routes from the Segale Business Park. Directly North on Andover Park West to connect with I -5 North to Seattle or South to Federal Way and Tacoma. At peak time 3:30pm to 6:OOpm traffic is bottle - necked at South Center Parkway. Attempting to get on I -5. The SouthCenter hill is a gridlock during peak times. This is also the route taken for junction to 405 N to Renton and Bellevue, again it is gridlock. Now lets look at the traffic going Southbound I -5. With the current closure of 200 St. [till November 1999???] traffic now heads West on 180th and goes up the steep hill at 178th to Military road. Again this is no picnic but probably is the best of the 3 exit routes. Finally we have the traffic heading to Kent and Southbound on Highway 167. Believe it or not this is worse that the SouthCenter hill. Most day's traffic is backed up from West Valley Highway to Andover Park West. CANS • CROWNS • CLOSURES • MACHINERY "f w•':° �fFu'` 3`:^ •tiii'.'ti�.:si':.'aatYF,$:�14f z Q W. re 6 U 0 co o, U) 1 WI J w o u. z� o'. w1, w. moo:. o- CI f-, w w: F=- U o: kJ • z, O F". z. . For the afore mentioned reasons I feel the additional truck traffic is going to cause chaos around the South area of SouthCenter. It is my understanding that a traffic survey was completed in conjunction with the project perhaps I could receive a copy of it! Sincer ly ours, 44 �J Michael T Plan -,: er Cc: A. Nichols Segale Inc. _ "0,4 /-01..99 13:54 FAX 206 764 3319 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF EMERG. MGMT DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX. 3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124-Z255 Emergency Management Branch 29 March 1999 Mr. Dave Clark Manager, Rivers Section King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98104 -5022 Dear Mr. Clark: Ej 002 Thank you for affording us the opportunity to review the proposed warehouse building development to be located immediately adjacent to the authorized levee at the Segale Business Park in Tukwila, Washington. We have reviewed the proposed project and have concerns about features that could impact the integrity of the existing structure. . The Segale levee is part of the Federally authorized flood control project that was mostly constructed by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers and turned over to the City of Tukwila on May 15, 1992, following a joint final inspection. The proposal to excavate below existing grade immediately landward of the levee toe has some serious ramifications associated with it. This work could cause piping or uplift pressures on the soils that could possibly lead to levee failures. The report written by GeoEngineers and dated March 1999 is not completely in agreement with a similar report written by Shannon and Wilson and dated June 1995. GeoEngineers' analysis indicates that foundation seepage and uplift pressures will not pose a risk to the stability of the levee and will not likely cause soil piping. Shannon and Wilson's conclusions indicated that while the anticipated seepage rates are considered low to moderate, the high total head under the landward toe of the levee will cause the unit to virtually become "quick." The soils in the area for the proposed warehouse project and those in the vicinity of Shannon and Wilson's. study are similar enough to cause concerns that this same condition may well occur if the excavation at the toe of the levee is allowed. '04/01;99 13:54 FAX 206 764 3319 EMERG MGMT._.. C j 003 There also appears to be a discrepancy between the 100 year flood level shown on the warehouse drawings and the 100 year flood stage calculated by the Corps of Engineers. Of more concern is the Standard Project Flood (SPF) level that determines our design and construction of these types of projects. Any work that impacts this levee should be based on the SPF level rather than the 100 year level. Based on data furnished by our Hydraulics and Hydrology Section, the SPF level at the upstream end of the proposed project is at elevation 31.65 feet MSL and 31.00 feet MSL at the downstream end. Based on these elevations, areas in the upstream end of the proposed project will be lower than the SPF and with the uncertainty of whether or not the levee and landward side toe will 'be stable during a flood event, the proposed grading plan is a serious concern to us. One possible solution to this problem would be to raise the overall grade of the warehouse about one and one half foot above the current proposed project. This would ensure that if the levee did fail during an SPF the flood waters would be contained within the project boundaries. If you have any questions please contact Bill Garrott at (206) 764 -3406 or Monte Kaiser at (206) 764 -3712. Sincerely, ul E. K•moroske, P.E. Chief, Emergency Management Branch -1lAC 1'S•0(0. (OO V I L,c, r- e4bOWL0 -�4t, +✓N'►'N izw'` env tt,, - ,6304 o.„,,,L 4.1 tat, p 0 21. A 0 to z _1.. z, re V.. 0 0`. CO H w u. co d z E; f- 0: z �. tu O w W W'. UN z. I, A F F I D A V I T enLI •ge,tII Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fl Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: U Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fl Shoreline Management Permit ODetermination of Non - significance J Mitigated Determination of Non ignif is ance QDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Official Notice / r V Other I ,�i IJo�ilc '7 L 4 ( L Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on I?7 ` lq Name of Project Ektfs, File Number 1.--61 61 Qt() -LCo7 Z: mow: 0 01 N w. w• J � • W 0 g • • a: • 1• •Z I- a . off -w z. vu): :o- . • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director *REVISION TO NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED March 19, 1999 The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: LOCATION: FILE NUMBERS: PROPOSAL: La Pianta Limited Partnership d.b.a. Segale Business Park 5801 through 6199 Segale Park Drive "C ", Tukwila, WA L99 -0006 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit); L99 -0007 (Design Review); E -99 -0003 (Environmental Review) To construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up building to be used for office, warehouse and maintenance space. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Land Altering, Building Permit The file may be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on Friday. "pril2, Monday, April 19, 1999. This date is being revised to due to an error in the original notice. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on either April 22, 1999 or May 27, 1999. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the hearing is still scheduled for one of these dates. If you cannot submit comments in writing. by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Board of Architectural Review. You may also request notification of the final decision. If you have questions about this proposal contact Carol Lumb, the Planner in charge of this file at 431 -3661. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Board of Architectural Review on a project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at 431 - 3670. A decision of the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review may be appealed to the Tukwila City Council. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: c:caroUSegak/notapp February 5, 1999 March 4, 1999 March 19, 1999, March 26, 1999 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431.3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development *REVISION TO NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED March 19, 1999 Steve Lancaster, Director The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: LOCATION: FILE NUMBERS: PROPOSAL: La Pianta Limited Partnership d.b.a. Segale Business Park 5801 through 6199 Segale Park Drive "C ", Tukwila, WA L99 -0006 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit); L99 -0007 (Design Review); E -99 -0003 (Environmental Review) To construct a 313,735 square foot concrete tilt -up building to be used for office, warehouse and maintenance space. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Land Altering, Building Permit The file may be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on Fri , Monday, April 19 1999. This date is being revised to due to an error in the original notice. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on either April 22, 1999 or May 27, 1999. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the hearing is still scheduled for one of these dates. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Board of Architectural Review. You may also request notification of the final decision. If you have questions about this proposal contact Carol Lumb, the Planner in charge of this file at 431 -3661. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Board of Architectural Review on a project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. A decision of the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review may be appealed to the Tukwila City Council. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: c:carol/Segale/notapp February 5, 1999 March 4, 1999 March 19, 1999, March 26, 1999 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 CBECXLIST 7 EN..:i20NMENTAL REVIEW/ SHORELINE PERMIT Mti- -.INGS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ( ( OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. (:‹DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV A (rn DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION+ - rio ∎,,moL (V ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL S•.ii CA 4(,t 4-,. * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS 4QCti •rc%4 i * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 ) K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( 3 TUKWILA LIBRARIES (�) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) •CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE (y) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ). TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS '( ) POLICE ( )_ PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WP51DATA \CHKLIST ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT (r � . ) PORT OF SEATTLE � K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL K. 6.0 . S v /mow (kJ& te„ t't.w.�,n .,,,- i.-fi- SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT (74' K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV: OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDIA Z rt ~ W J 0, 00 N O .11J I• F—, W g J•. = a, l-W Z�; I- 0 Z • U O: :O N, O H: S 0! LL.~ W Z; o Z M. A. Segale, Inc. PO Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Cadillac Plastic 18292 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Familian NW 18323 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Crown Cork& Seal 18340 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 United Stationers 18300 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Gaco Western PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 Crate Tech, Inc. 6206 South 190' Street Kent, WA 98032 Keyston Brothers 18301 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Columbia Packaging 18296 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Tractor Parts 18349 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 A. America 18255 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 Rock -Tenn 18340 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Reid Plastics, Inc. 6545 South Glacier Place Tukwila, WA 98188 Family Life Insurance 18285 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Fletcher's Fine Foods 18338 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Alpak Food Equipment 18298 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 Viking Office Products 18300 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 General Medical Corp. 18325 Segale Park Dr "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 The Box Maker 6230 South 190t' Street Kent, WA 98032 Materials, Inc. 6214 South 190' Street Kent, WA 98042 ti Ill: • Jo UO .c o: . W ='• wo J CDR; = d; w • , z� z I: ICI All wr. H U 11 0; • '.. z w VN. City of Tukwila 6200 Sout1►ceuter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2599 Andy Levesque King Co. SWM 700 5th Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 March 4, 1999 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MARCH 4, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Mr. Steve Nelson P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 RE: Segale Business Park, Building 981 Files: L99 -0006 - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit L99 -0007 - Design Review E99 -0003 - Environmental Review Dear Mr. Nelson: Your application for a shoreline substantial development permit for an office building in the shoreline which is subject to design review and SEPA, located at 5801 through 6199 Segale Park Drive "C" has been found to be complete on March 4, 1999 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project has been assigned to Carol Lumb and may be scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission in April or May. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to prepare and install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. Please call me 3 days prior to installing the notice board to arrange the pick up of the laminated Notice of Application. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, please return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain any other necessary permits issued by other agencies. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 w. 6 U0' N0: wi J qa� co d. Hw z o, z UJ o CO 2 U. es; _Z ui H H,. 0 Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Business Park March 4, 1999 I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, 60A,p,t Carol Lumb Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c: carol\segalekomplete.doc vo cnw,. W w 0:. J: u_Q co d. z F: o: z w w:, 2 U �. ;0. 0 I-, w :W` U. I-G z' 0. z DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION a RTi7KWILA FEB ` 9 1999 PERMIT CENTER The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the z space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. _ ,t— w 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE D A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with 0 the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and cn 0 pedestrian movement. w w B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened —' to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. w 0 C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. g RESPONSE: (A) Sidewalks have been provided at the street frontage to provide safe access to w. the sidewalk systems within Segale Business Park and the adjoining public z H system. The entire street frontage and river front perimeters have been z O' landscaped. Additional plantings at the offices and private outdoor area have w w also been provided. D (B) Parking areas are surrounded by landscape. Dumpsters will be screened with 0 a concrete enclosures. 01-. (C) The height of the building is within the guidelines as set forth in the zoning = w' code. The size of the structure is consistent with other buildings within the ; development. 0 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA ,E- A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. z B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. CRITERIA RESPONSE: (A) The use and style of the building is of similar design and construction type as neighboring buildings and developments. (B) The landscape plan continues the existing streetscape planting within the development and provides for a landscape transition from the site to the river environment. (C) N/A (D) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns are safe and have been designed to be convenient. (E) Site access aligns with existing intersections to provide for a smooth flow onto the adjoining street systems for car and truck traffic. BAR.1 ATTACHMENT F 1 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: (A) Existing site topography in not significant to the site. (B) Proposed grades are appropriate and safe. (C) Plant type, size and location have been selected to be consistent with existing landscaping within the development. (D) Plants to be protected by curbs and sidewalks. (E) Landscaping has been placed in the required areas. In addition, additional plantings have been placed adjacent to the building where the office functions occur. (F) A combination of fencing and evergreen screening will screen the maintenance yard (G) N/A (H) A lighting plan has been submitted showing fixture locations and type. Light levels have been designed to provide for security and function as well as glare considerations. The color of light is consistent with other exterior lighting in the development. 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. C. Building components — such as windows, doors, eaves and parapets — should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. BAR.1 2 z F. 1z re 2 00 co cn w= J H: w0 • = • a. I_ la Z. z�, Z O: LU O N, w w = U' 1- u 'a ..z U N. z DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for an accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with the building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: (A) The architectural design is commercial in character with consideration given to offices as well as warehousing. (B) The building is of similar scale and height as neighboring buildings and developments. (C) See architectural elevations. (D) See color board. (E) Mechanical equipment will be located on the roof such that public visibility from the street is minimized and screening will not be necessary. (F) A lighting plan has been submitted with consideration of fixture type to accent offices, provide security and function at truck loading areas and minimize glare at the river environment. (G) A variety of design elements have been included to add interest to the building. They include warehouse windows, feature stripes and diamonds, painted pilasters and concrete fin walls at the offices. The shape of the structure along the south elevation is modulated similarly to the riverbank. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: (A) Picnic tables will be provided at the private out door open area. (B) N/A BAR.1 3 .. 01/27/1999 16:49 12068684292 KEN LARt,t January 25,1299 KEN LARGE LANDSCAPE PAGE 02 21803 NE 17th Court Redmond, WA 980534104 Phone: 425 - 836 -4578 Fax: 425-868-4292 Pager: 206 -464 -1269 Cellular: 206-818-7346 Segale Business Park 15000 Andover Parkway, Suite 200 Tukwila, WA 95138 Attn: Steve. Neison Dear Steve: The general requiremente of the zoning code Chapter 18.52, Section 18.52.040, Item B. Coverage Standards requires 90% live ground coverage within 3 years 2ind 40% tree coverage within 10 years. All 5hrube and groundcovers are sized and planted to attain a continuous cover of living pl,-.3nt9 per standard landscape practice. Most groundcovere are not spaced greater than 2' triangular Spacing. if these plants grow 3" per year. then full coverage would occur within 3 years. The :shrubs will grow approximately 6" per year and should be touching within 3 years. The deciduous trees are planted with a 8 -10' wide canopy. These trees will grow 2 -3 feet sspread per year. Within 10 years the selected trees will reach mature canopy, more than 40% coverage. Coniferous trees are planted at approximately 30' on center. The selected varieties stay full to the ground and do not spread it canopy, as do deciduous trees. The trees specified are installed at ci' width, and will grow in width at the rate of 1' to 18" per year. Within 10 yea -s the coniferous trees will have a spread of 16'. ATTACHMENT E. Z • 6 JU U O: '00! cow, • w= CO LL' w 0, LL Q • =0 _. 1-0: Z 1-: 2 j • 0H. • = U, ~- •— O� • • Z •0 F', O Z ,.01/27/1999 16:49 12068684292 • Segale Business Park January 25,1999 Page 2 Total landscape area: Total Canopy in square feet at planting: A. Deciduous (50.24 of/ea), 40 ea B. Coniferous (2826 sf /ea), 67 ea C.. Total a'; planting: KEN LARGE LANDSCAPE PAGE 03 Total Canopy in square feet projected in 10 years: A. Dec;duc;us (607.6 of /ea), 40 ea B. Con iferoUS (200.96 sf /ea), 67 ea C. Tot AI i S F at 10 years Please call .should you have any questions or comments. erely, 40,110 sf 2009.6 sf 1893.42 of 3903.02 (9.7'/0) 24,304 sf 13,464.32 sf 37,7695.32 (94%) Shoreline Management Act of 1971 - - PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL File Number: Status: Applied: Approved: Expiration: L99-0006 APPROVED -•- 02/05/1999 05/10/1999 05/09/200.1. DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to RCW 90.56, a permit is hereby granted to: EGALE BUSINESS PARK #961 to undertake the followIng development: CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 313,735 O.FT. WAREHOUSE TO BE USED FOR WAREHOUSE AND upon the following pr Address: Parcel No: Sec/Twn/Rnae: 5801 S 3523 /••• . • -7 a iifj .7 • F;:;. •.2* V _.. '■;*-U,.;,;\ / e -1, 4 4 ; ^4 .. THE laggpirispRevEcr,witfL BE WITHrWTHE ARE-AiliE,NqEEN RIVER AND ,4WA5tOCIATED4WETLANb6,1 'WHICH ISAlTMORELTIpt iTATEWIDE SIG4IFICACAND1fS DESIZ4hAtEDIAS AN URBAN„EAURgNMENO\ :10## l I ,•-• • .1 \I A .ttst, -11 The foiidter4rog broy s z are applicable to--.t.b-ts,",rsteve 1 opment --4419 - V11.1 URT5AN • .('ik.' li4; ,u....---, • ilip -4 .D --,,,,.. .....0' .1?: .4 ....,,._,...,,•., / f \ \ 4.",..jt 4 iL4 t 4 y..i., I; 21..1 _ . ,I, .., ' % .. , ; k ,.; b i --.-- ',.. r ..:,,, .4:1'• 4 ! .--•- .-.; 4 73- 0 ;1 • , ' 1, 4 Y : / .„......1 • 1 f":"-------„___.— . ,.. : fo ; ft6. - 71; ,r ■ 4 /I' : , •, . -- . - Development porsAIA ,0' this,:p.e:rmit sha'lrlie.uridertaken,vursudhtY,Xo the attach idlt eM'S a rili criad,..1-tirdi-)sZ ::_,>, \ ?;---./ , -"i ;■,ili i = 4.3Ir Ts . e , / , '' —'--- '''' . . 4 .1 >'!I This peim,i tNit IT-Anted p'arsts4ht to \,the S.hCfr-671-crre.! Managetnef t Act ply 1971 an ,-, . A •4 1.••••K._,/ , i / 4,"-'4 N\-: •,*■-- ..\' • r`;'4A 1 0 411 i " •' nothingT thpisto.penmit shall e)5cuset.h.e.,;.aRp-11-from:CoMin011iwith any other Uderata:te or local stat4teS, .611-0-nAnces oc'rea0ati*s app1icab*,ta‘,40s Project, but notjnCiOnSient.riith)thori,tane Managemeri,t4Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW).A '., :--,, • ' ' ' "4 /;;':/ .1 -:., ) • , /,Z0q •:,, .• :,..,.." .t 2 This permit:1May b4kgAscInded purs,u4t to Rt.W0'.56.140(i-8) irvatthe eve permittee tai IA to:04ply'w4th the terms or conditiTi*herX6V R:, gri'.;• \-11. .. • • . . r ..,, .. , '),..•) 3 1 ,, .. , ,I' . . ■•■•• . / • ,,, CONSTRUCTION4URI-JUANT TO THII.:. PmRMTT WILL NOT BEGIN OW,412. NOT AUTHORIZED _,• UNTIL TWENTY-01*(21) DAYS FROM7:1*-HDATE OF FILING WI447THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED RCW 90.58A,I40(6)-;;AND WAC 172.7:W090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW. PROCEEDINGS,24NliTjATED lurTifFIW,IVIENTY-ONE-fC;214:" DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TEkmTNATsai.,EXCEPT AS EROVIDED?"IN RCW 90. 58.140(5) ' Steve Lancaster Director, Planning Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173-14-060. nt the Date: 5- 10 59_ ATTACHMENT G - —CITY OF TUKWILA Address: 5301 SEGALE PARK-DR—C - Suite: Tenant: Tvpa: P-SHORE Parcel #: 352304-9016 • • • Per-mit No: L99-0006 Status: APPROVED Applje.0: 02/05/1999 Issued: 05/10/1999 - • . 101,4'411/41,44k01**444,4**9**0***k*****9*4***k****k*****k***k***********41**44 Permit Conditions: 1 ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED-IN THE LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT IN THE GENERAL AB.E.Aa_Ima CATED ON ATACHMENT C SUCH THAT EMERGENCY VE.14-191,NOR "K OPERATIONS ARE NOT IMPEDED. ••: a;„,, , '''-':77;;'-'' .• / • .riL'A,+? \ • • 1p • fie*• • 3 4.6 • A -4- ■ -...1 ■Y'*;4e ...? ....4 •-• ••? h 11 ,,1 ; i T:"........ss*t..V.:.-11-....7.E7,74... "N ,4 • .. 1) ..• V .le;...,---■...■ I-, ,...05' i v.......- . , '''' 11„ • - ■•.. • -:l . N ..■,...,;' 4., \ '1, ''>'. • •;;T:fr i .t..;4.j' •;, \ I * :it% '...) 7t • . ' ' 1 ; ... . ''.) .,:,-'4'"''...•- ., . ..,4 - . ( . ■;11 4 -.., =1,, ....,1- , -3 ''''" -,........7.j ., i , • ' • ::i. : ..,., .-...., ::•., ........,a, I , .7 ....:, . . ,,. - • ... '- : ; a, -.... a o 1••••••• [ ..,—L- J .1 —........ ....„,.....___. ,.. .., , 7 A r ..,.., - ,f.. r i-,-- .... .. ,-;: 'I 'I 17 .1 , 1 4 --..,...'.0,:\ , .; .....--; -iS. , • a \ ; : .. "•,. /7-"--s-N...... ,,, -,, , • .......1 .- i ....4 .91 A.\ \ 1* . .... ,.........,,„ .... \ ,4--:"..--......--1,1----;_____,---_---;„ 1\1. to...„_----.1. :-,4. , , ,) . ...„____ ...-. ....: k .."-- .% ) '"47.---', • ''''' -r? . 1 - a 4 ' , .'"4 .;: 4 ..i,r,....„ 'A % '••;rti ' 1 4 .N. If i -;.:i-,,"7-C • ,..,... 7t3r.....„.....„ 1 , ..i. ..), ''... ; •:1,2 .11 •;.'17.1fr--A''' ; i ::.,,11: 1-" i : t \ ; : • , - / .1/4:7,-,,..„, IN; / 3 , '.. . -;;. ) , „;, • . i I i .. ■,......., l• • ) ..1 ',.....1 .. .'... ) '•:!,43'.. "•A NZ1 ■;/ • ••• •••\'‘-‘,. ••••■ ••■••• , • 1 ;,! *k. • . • z Z rL w. 2 _10 .00 111 W -J u j 0 u_ co I a w z I— 0 z F- LU uj 2 D CI O • (-9: O 1— • uj 0 - 0 . Z lir co /- z CITY C--4' TUKWILA �. Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 DESIGN REVIEW (P -DR) APPLICATION Planner- Fire Nu :Mum ............. DYApplication Complete .(Date.. SEPA Eile:T Cl. AppltcaticnInco4plete:?(Date: • " Shore line °Fi f_ PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Segale Business Park Building 981 B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),'blcck and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection; if proposal applies to several properties, list the streets bounding the area.) 5801 thru 6199 Segale Park Drive "C" • Quarter. SE Section: 35 Township: 2 3N Range: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Steve Nelson ADDRESS: PO Box 88.028 Tukwila, WA. 98138 -2028 PHONE: (206) 575 -2000 SIGNATURE: DATE: 2/11/7 { RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB °51999 PERMIT CENTER Fixture Type A Z ~w CL j0 00 cn0 cn W J= F- u) L.L. w0 a u_a cn� =a 1- w z= F- f- o zF-- w • w 00 O - O H w • w Z w • U= H 1- O z Jan 28 99 10:59a HOLOPHANE® p.2 wallpack' ®S ri'es Fixture Type C ' Precise, widespread light distribution Shock resistant, long life prismatic refractor Special underpass optics Field adjustable socket Utilizes up to 4001V HPS or MH lamps ATTACHMENT D3 z 2 -J UO; N U • W =: w O; 11. ;O tn; .w W; C.Y. • a•• i Z' z Surface Cylinders Versatile Architectural Accents Wall /Ceiling /Pendant Mount Hubbell offers an excellent selection of architectural cylinders for accent illumination. This series features wall, ceiling, and pendant units in cylinders of 6 ", 8 ", 10" and 13" diameters. This allows the specifier a choice of fixtures to maintain the proper perspective with the structure. A range of incandescent, fluorescent. metal halide and high pressure sodium light sources are available for proper illumination and color. Refer to specific sizes for standard offerings. All units are listed for damp locations. Luminaires have a bronze finish as standard and are available in black. white and satin gray. For custom colors. consult factory for minimum quantity. price and availability. f Fixture Type B 6 and 8" housings are extruded aluminum. 10 and 13" housings are.060 aluminum rolled and heliarc welded for a clean "seamless" appearance. Incandescent and HID sockets are heavy duty porcelain in medium or mogul base. For 50 Hz ballasts consult factory. Units are UL and CSA listed for damp locations. All mounting hardware is heavy duty and sized to safely support and compliment the overall appearance of the assembly. Larger HID units have ballast /socket assemblies packaged separately for shipment to protect the decorative housing from shipping damage. ORDERING INFORMATION - 6" Cylinders Extruded aluminum with wall, ceiling and pendant capability. Designed for low wattage applications with mounting heights of six to ten feet. Incandescent, fluorescent and HPS sources available. See capabilities below. Open Catalog Numbers Clear Alzak Black Baffle Source Wattage Application Finishl B43 -6M B43 -6CM BF43 -6CM B46 -6M B44 -6M B44 -6CM B48 -6M Incand. Fluor. Incand. 150W /R40 13W /DTT 150W/R40 Wall -Down Wall -Down Wall -Up/ Down Bronze Bronze Bronze C142 -6M C145 -6M C142 -6CM C144 -6M CF1426 -CM C145 -6CM C147 -6M CF145 -6CM Incand. Fluor. Incand. Fluor. 150W /Rc0 13W /DTT 150W/R40 13 W /DTT Ceiling Ceiling Pendant Pendant Bronze Bronze Bronze Bronze NRG -221 NRG - 231 -P123 — — HPS /Med, 50W/B17 — NRG- 221 -RB HPS/Med, 50W/B17 — — HPS /Med. 50W/B17 — NRG -231 RBP123 HPS/Med. 50W/B17 Wall -Down Wall -Down Pendant Pendant 3 Bronze2 Bronze2 Bronze2 Bronze2 Note: Units UL listed for damp locations. Standard pendants are 24 inches with :3' off vertical swivel. (B and C Units). 1. For optional finishes with extended lead times. change M to GWWhite. Kti•Blazi. S•Satin aluminum. 2. Bronze finish is only offering. (NRG) 3. 12 inch pendant rigid mount (order NRG•SK for 45' swivel canopy). OPTIONS - 6" Cylinders (order with B or C Series Cylinders) Suffix Description -/13 "A" lamp reflector - downlight -/14 "A" lamp reflectors - up -down light -/26 Six inch lens assembly for top protection on up -down units (specify color) Hubbell Lighting, Inc. 460 i AGSF.42.• sYa1WY. W441.1-; .'AIWA 14ah6FtW Watik0411,e.i• LUMASQGARE® II Fixture Type D • Ceiling /Canopy Luminaire • Rugged Construction • Superior Photometric Performance Hubbell's Lumasquare II is ideal for either new construction or retrolighting inefficient lighting fixtures at 8 -20 foot mounting heights. It delivers a Type V symmetrical distribution with excellent cutoff for indoor or outdoor applications such as car lots, canopies, parking garages, entryways, or wherever an attractive, high performance fixture is required. Available in 70/100/150 watt H.P.S. or 100/175 watt metal halide, Lumasquare II may be installed directly over an existing junction box or wired through its two 1/2" conduit entrances. Housing — Rugged die -cast aluminum with durable LEKTROCOTE finish for lasting appearance. The electrical components are hard mounted to the 14" x 14" housing for maximum heat dissipation, cool ballast operation and long life. The luminaire is designed to mount directly over an existing junction box for top entry or can be used for through wiring with two convenient Y2" side hubs. Reflector — One - piece, hydroformed aluminum with high specularity and reflectivity. This fluted reflector spreads the lumens evenly throughout the refractor for superior photometric performance. Refractor — One piece, injection molded, clear prismatic refractor evenly distributes the light and eliminates glare. The U.V. stabilized refractor is fully gasketed and available in high transmittance acrylic or rugged vandal resistant polycarbonate. Four captive stainless steel screws retain refractor and protect the lamp. (Four Torx screws provided for tamper proof installations.) Lamp — Clear medium base 70/100/150 watt HPS or 1001175 watt metal halide lamp is supplied for ease of installation. Vertical burning position facilitates maximum photometric performance. Ballast — HPS is available in HPF or NPF with -40 °F starting, metal halide -20 °F. Performance — I.E.S. Type V symmetrical distribution. 3 to 1 spacing -to- mounting height ratio with superior 82- 84% efficiencies in acrylic and excellent 63 -66% efficiencies in polycarbonate. Additional Features — Captive stainless steel hardware, optional photocontrol and fusing available. U.L. 1572 listed, C.S.A. certified, suitable for wet locations. HUBBELL. Lighting, Inc. DIMENSIONS i l i�l'i('1I1 I! it 1111 i Ili�lllli�i;lli I 1!11 14" (356 mm) T ." 121 mm) 81s' (206 mm) 14" (356 mm) 1 Project Type Catalog Number Remarks ATTACHMENT D5 __.. .........m~avow.. *i2AtK+ PtiN,PPon leir�e+ 10" Aperture HID- -Sownlight Universal Rough -In Housing Housing Catalog Number: HL8THID Round aperture HID rough -in. thermally protected. Suitable for ceilings without insulation or installations where insulation is kept 3" away from sides and 1" away from top of fixture. • 20 gauge stamped steel plaster frame with fixed hanger brackets designed to accept 112" EMT (by others) or CHB -26. Order bar hangers separately • Prewired junction box with 1/2" and 3/4" pryout KOs and insulation detector. accessible from below the ceiling • Ballast tray and wiring splice cox prewired with mateing plug -in style ballast — order ballast separately • Pre - painted rolled steel can adjusts 1 -1/2" in plaster frame • Fixed lamp socket bracket • Medium base porcelain socket ORDERING INFORMATION Fixture Type E NRTUC Nationally recognized testing laboratory listed. Full compliance to both UL and CSA standards. For use in damp or wet locations. Catalog Number Description HL8THID Universal rough -in housing ACCESSORIES - Must be ordered separately Catalog Number Description CHB -26 Bar hangers BALLASTS Wattage Metal Halide High Pressure Sodium Mercury Vapor 50 70 100. 150 175 1. Use ANSI M107 ballast. HLB -50 -H9 HLB -70 -H9 HLB -10 -H9 HLB -15 -H9 1 HLB -17 -H9 1 HLB -50S9 HLB-70S9 HLB -1059 HLB -1559 HLB -10C9 HL8THID 10.125" 24.0" 257 mm 610 mm Note: 0 -Width • 12.0" 11.75" 305 mm 298 mm Hubbell Lighting, Inc. 209 ATTACHMENT D6 r. Z W lQY w2 JU 00; W 0' w wt W =; in J H w}} w Q. Ea' �=..w Z Off, to 0 l- •W H U'. o` 0 �. O ~. Z RL -400 REFRACTOR LCMINAIRE Provides ease of installation and main- tenance, maximum energy and illumination efficiency, and improved optical performance. Hubbell's RL -400 Roadway Refractor luminaire provides an excellent contemporary state -of -the art approach for a wide range of technically demanding environmental and streetlighting requirements. Utilizing the most advanced engineering available, its optical assembly with prismatic asymmetrical refractor control provides uniform roadway or area illumination. Additionally, Hubbell's modular wiring center provides ease of maintenance with its tool -less ballast access feature. The RL -400 Series also maximizes energy and illumination efficiency while reducing total operating costs and providing ease of installation. Although designed to optimize HPS Tight sources, it can also easily accommodate Mercury and Metal Halide. Available in wattages ranging from 200 to 400 watts, its optional magnetic regulator ballast increases lamp life and improves overall optical performance. Hubbell's RL -400 Roadway Refractor Series provides the ideal roadway lighting system to improve the appearance of street and parking areas, increase traffic safety, and combat crime and vandalism, ideal for either new construction of retrofitting onto existing mast arm installations, in short any application which requires uniform illumination and excellent efficiency. Recommended applications for this luminaire series include: • Roadways • Malls • Parkways • Industrial parks • Arterial streets Housing — Rugged, die -cast, aluminum housing finished in durable gray or bronze LEKTROCOTEe polyester. Ballast — A wide range of ballast types and voltages, including an efficient magnetic regulator design. Power Module — Permits easy access to the ballast compartment and allows either door or top housing mounted ballast Refractor — Prismatic borosilicate glass. Socket — Socket assembly permits easy field adjustments to obtain different photometric distributions. Mounting — Provides a complete selection of arms for most mounting requirements. Stabilized "bird shield" permits 11/4" through 2" pipe sizes. Additional Features: • Two door system • Sealed optical compartment • Plug -in starting aid • Modular wiring center • High strength latch and safety screw attached to the ballast compartment • Optics designed to optimize HPS sources • Computer designed ANODAL® finished reflector • Custom -R -Build (modular) catalog logic Options: • Magnetic regulator ballast • Tool -less top housing entry • Top housing or door mounted ballast • Fusing • Leveling device indicator • Bronze Lektrocote finish (M -51) • Charcoal filter assembly • Silicone gasketing • U.L. Listed Lighting, Inc. DIMENSIONS Fixture type F 12" MIN. (305 mm) DISTANCE FOR DOOR REMOVAL E.P.A. 1.1 SQ. FT. Project Type Catalog Number Remarks SEGALE BUS /NESS PARK H.�.�... - .,- BUILDING 981 CITY OFETUKWILA VICINITY MAP NT8 FEB - 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER J 10.1111•1 " ; ' ' "! ' , • : ; ! • : it) •-• • • • j 1 if& s'L,Anti.1111 Sr NI • h •ttt : iiite 4t, I. rm.+, • , 12 / /1.4// 17:,7 4:3 1,33: / / / : 77 ,', ' • / 2. I / 4 ../4;/i«'-/t'" / 5A g / f..)1 / • 'A : :..'.Zs:n : :: ;; /: ;.i.:"■ f / ./ / / 1/ / / I r / / mbc A v /..§.--...wit.,. 734 7113.t r 'Ill // 1 =r111:=1' in. unmet, Ift OP MI:AM MM., t.1 rual:4.1 caarizar rt 04 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB •5 1999 PERMIT CENTER !t .1 :a • ••••• 1 OF 3 .■■■■ �� rw� .7;:' �, •:x /,.,a / II ;p i/ }}w I 'Irn til <• / / M {b �t �'K •xs • {M{ro • Y M .� . . 10••••• Y• NOM YY MIN -- RECEIVED CITY of matriLA FEB - 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER 1 !I 1 1 •1 E 0P 3 Z —J C.)] :U cn 0: W : ,W =. 'N LL.: W }}' • g_71:• Na H W`: I-- o'. Z I- • 0 iO N• Z �' RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB - 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER 1 1 tt 1 1 4 30?3 Z ,..<Z • te JU: UO W = • J• ,NLL WO <: ;CO =a; ..Z � F— O. Z F—' U� fW W': Z 1— —. _Z OFT Z ro..,,, r •.4.18 11tie- M.t.•..I �I ENIaARGED PLAN @/ .ENTRY 11414 .' • H e••••■••mUl1!•••11• L1..I. Of .1.101.&411..T.09911.. 1110 Don" timer 090 MR (....*. I.IM {}r_ In. 1.1. 1••11111•01•311111MMIL•11 •M• runt LZO[ND 0 ROI 0 N ••• Olt .••. wlwlul MK w e.,.•.1 1•9.81 1.1101 we anDen 1 0/ NO.. M W I..}., 1..1.- 8.4.84 • ..4 • 111 I W•... 1....,S • • 1M ImW.o a•.P.. -' a..1 M 1 1! Port 1/"'R'0 71.9.0/ I.... rM r I..8 k 14 v. 10.19 941 ar.. Oe Oi to r ow. w • •. w 11 . r TN Irr et .. e.« 0....4 r.•.1••1� 11.19. w 1 0'1 • M. +. Ow 1y 110 ,r M • ® D1 as a.♦... tot M µ. 0.11 W MI 71 • 1. 1..+....-t 1 •. (TU 1 1.0.• h 1... 11• r •441 0.4. 1 .1 1 M•.••• 1.44 N.-/ r K 11 M1-. _. .. 1• 1 1.11..1 • .1 . O. I .•. 11.+414 •.Y 111.-1-.4.. • u 11.9 h••■•• ••/ O4 84 1.1, MM. Mr.• ..T. •.. .r 1.4I a Is •1.N • W 11• P. 1......• 84. 1•+• ••• 1....10. •-K W b •...a ►•....•Mr 11... w: 0.19 1/1 • IF •0.14• •... .1..... P.N. 11 -In..- W.( Ir1 N• 0.4+.1. 10.01 9...1 1 ..... K tt. . r - BMW 11.11.68 11•.... • te 14. w e. • • •111111\ •111,....4.+. fowl el 16, 1... 1..1. • r LANDSCAPE PLAN PRIVATE OUTDOOR OPEN AREA 1,41. 1. • .I RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING 981 LANDSCAPE PLAN 11.•01119 9.10 N.• ^�� *0011 0011 1r10 _Y•1-9 1464 FED 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER Z )O u= 2 u. u O. J d _. Z O. ILI Lu U CI' O� 0 I- 11.1 W ILL 9 iWu) SEGALE BUSINESS PARK WNW, MMYUIN �1M ... .... .� /x11.401 n 1..na ua �N,LAHVbY lin BUILDING 981 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB - 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER LOADING DOCK NG PLAN UXLOYENG 93M INS ID NORTH EAST TRESS) l ER A MAJORITY COUNT. BARE :ONSTRUCTLON IULLT'ED. MENTS PER INTING PER (15 HE WILDING DS 8690 SQ. FT. 236 L.P. 14.3 15 572 375 SQ. FT. 8890 SQ. FT. 4540 SQ. FT. ¢, •;•¢•,uri'.s't+rv+n.:dt.+�:.!1 • • Quin SYMBOL 32 POP 6 CAL 9 IPA 7 INS 4 TM 54 PYR 19 EUA 66 RH 29 CPA 13 SAW 6 MR 57 RRA 377 BUX 116 AW 288 CD 190 VM 1080 5F 654 RUB BOTANICAL NAME PRAXINUS OXYCARPA FLAME FLAME ASH CALOCEDRUS OECURRENS INCENSE CEDAR T UJ A PLLCATA ATROVIRENS ATRONIi EN CEDAR r -• ILEX NE UE STEVENS NEt LIE STEVENS HOLLY TSUGA MERTENSIANA MOUNTAIN HEMLOCK PYRAMIDAL'S EUONYMUS ALATA COMPACTA BURNING BUSH RHODODENDRON GOMER WATERER COTrONEAST R PAW EYu PARNEY COTOPEASTER SPIRAEA ANTHONY WATERER MELIA GRANDIFLORA RHODODENDRON RAMAPO MMUS 8EMPERVIAENS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS WA URSU 10NNENNECK COTO EASTER DAMMERI DA MMERICOTGNEASTER YWCA MINOR PERIWINII.E ANNUALS CHANGED PER SEASON RUOUS CALYCINOIDES SODDED LAWN SUE SPACING 12 -14' MAX 30'OC BRANCHING AT 7' 12 -14' HT. FULL. 10-12' HT. FULL 1012' HT FULL 8-10' HT. 10-12' HT. 3-4' HT 36-42' 819 36' -42" AU. LANDSCAPE BODE SHALL RECEIVE 2' DEPTH MUL4H. MULQ4 SHALL BE 11/4' MAX FINE GROUND BARK 30.36' 30.36' 12 -15' 15.18' B19 1 GALLON CAN 2' TRI SPACING 1 GALLON CAN 30' TR/ SPACING 1 GALLON CAN 2' TR/ SPACING 4' POTS 1 GALLON CAN 2' TRI SPACING c c a z a H z 0 z S MONS: 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT. SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (zoe) 75-2003 �c.� -• BUILDING .98. • EVISED• • z M UO' (f) W, W I: J �. W } }r0} lL Q N a; • W •Z= F—. 1- O: W uj U • •O • W W. .Z U_ tLH O. ill Z. 0 H'. O Z • CO V) rn C) r O G) rn Z � CO m. ' r",� Vl C) ■ 1 D C Z rn z r 1z al UO cn p W =: J w0 gas u. a N D _ v _ Z H' ZO w 2 j Up.. p 1-; 20 LLS .. Z'. ILI co z • • 35 30 25 20 15 10 • 5 0 SPF C.O.E. EL. 31.48 F.F. OF BLO RIVER ENVM'T -- -- r LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT -j —T-- 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT ---100-YEAR- ECHO EL. 29.80 MEAN HIGHWATER . NEW- FINISI I GRADE, TYP. z J FACE- BUILDING _EXIST TYP. 1 EL. -26.05 I i 1 w -1 J F- W x N >- w a. a c W -200 -150 -100 -50 12 +00.00 50 100 150 G, TYP. 200 1 • WI. an a re Y.. wi r • r :'�el.''�eJ` we eT ' r,e eq.. 'e, •'e, M •••• •.• C ,._•. .yr ' • •e ''twe''t 1a':' .•ea' 1.r tr ...► I Ir.. er•4. Fr err r r�ee•'Ce.r 'r e! v.. , .Y•ea••••. 4 1. lt s • r J \ � i -J M MEZZANINE ENTRY 10000 - --ZAN 3000 SF OFFICE O aF OFFICE i- V R O O O O / O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 3000 SF STORAGE 0 0 0 0 M 0 F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M SEGA< E o 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _.. 41 O v�n� O . C i . O d O r • ! O i `� • ••• .•• ...11. ., r Ard 12410W 1 • i a) z a 0 0 • A2 NMMSMNIBSMVNMEMMMMESMESMMSSMMZ2pSrnfrHr..,mrs2Lzms. \„. •.•••••••••■ V F- LU 63 O) 2 ce 0 0 • A3 z < Z .6/ 6 0 00• :co co L11 ILI I 1,- (/) LL : w 0 g 5 (0 3, I- al I- 0 Z 11.1 ui 2 D• • U). :0 — C1 111 uj • r I-- 6` • Z , 161 =U) 0 I- z ow, Isr 41, ss MI.' 141,11, se, •■•••• ••••■• 441,1e Min olr W.. bir-Ile • •r eAr "1 rr,4' rsirre war; r;Irarpr ....',r, sr, rar,....r• gre sr, r ...sr rr w. r'r we • sowe to.er ii••■•• 111,41, .." ...Tr gr4r ., r. r,r, re r'r we r'r rsr • r r ••• ,or,'''r 3000 6F OFFICE 7 ■ = ---, 7 II E3 1J ED i-73 .1 411 CD 7 ■ 215000 6F WARE'. OU5E = C3 II CD it 0 = = = ‘■ it 0 it II 0 4 It 1=3 ■r— ..... .I.-- ■..--- 7 It -ler • V ....- .. II Lb moo* row ., to: oo*, ,1 NMMSMNIBSMVNMEMMMMESMESMMSSMMZ2pSrnfrHr..,mrs2Lzms. \„. •.•••••••••■ V F- LU 63 O) 2 ce 0 0 • A3 z < Z .6/ 6 0 00• :co co L11 ILI I 1,- (/) LL : w 0 g 5 (0 3, I- al I- 0 Z 11.1 ui 2 D• • U). :0 — C1 111 uj • r I-- 6` • Z , 161 =U) 0 I- z •.ICATED MAM .tDI•N•D• ETAMM unummnmumnu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII mmmunnnnuunm uumnnnnnuumin IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIim mullllllllllllllll !11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi mmuIIIIIIIIlullm1111111111n IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIII M,.• .ra a••• Y I 1 r M• NY laaED .A00 • TONi/•ONt S YSTEM NORTH ELEVATION TTTT 11111 1111 ■ ■MM■ ■MMM■ -umP- IIII EMU ■M■■■ MINIM T /.14 DOD. n == GCO n ■II■ n 1.11. LYON • n n 1 4 EAST ELEVATION r RETURN ELEVATION r—ii OGO n WEST ELEVATION TTT T O '1.)NWD ._E) T T METAL CA1PACI R•11.111. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB — 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER 6 • n n eat. n GONG PAM n R LIIII Y 9E1 -n n WEED 1111► --1 r-- SOUTH ELEVATION J #anee:c.1 w••,tsPU-s':e N� Yo.1.b:.r...n5::<xf. • rn z' 1 1 Z =I-= ~ W: 're2 JU U0 UO U) W • W N V„ W0 • L Q: ▪ W Z Z °. W 0 . :0 H: W W, V • LLO Z. • W UN • • O Z _tw, o. • PAH 1: III 11111111111111111111111111 U111111111111111111111111111 12 0 0 ALTALOY°T 111111:31111111111111101011111111111111111111111111 I 11111111111111111 M I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 0 I I I 1 1 MMNMM 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 III M R 4111111 ,j 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Q oi l FETAL OvtibtAD 0,5 , El E. • a�� 1 1► I I' Blip. .�...:,:. mil � —� . TTTT 11111 1111 ■ ■MM■ ■MMM■ -umP- IIII EMU ■M■■■ MINIM T /.14 DOD. n == GCO n ■II■ n 1.11. LYON • n n 1 4 EAST ELEVATION r RETURN ELEVATION r—ii OGO n WEST ELEVATION TTT T O '1.)NWD ._E) T T METAL CA1PACI R•11.111. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB — 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER 6 • n n eat. n GONG PAM n R LIIII Y 9E1 -n n WEED 1111► --1 r-- SOUTH ELEVATION J #anee:c.1 w••,tsPU-s':e N� Yo.1.b:.r...n5::<xf. • rn z' 1 1 Z =I-= ~ W: 're2 JU U0 UO U) W • W N V„ W0 • L Q: ▪ W Z Z °. W 0 . :0 H: W W, V • LLO Z. • W UN • • O Z File: L 99 -0007 Drawing #1 -20 F L 99 -0007 Drawing #1 -20 11illliiilmi Iiil .iiii!.li1111illL11.11111111.111 1110111 111111111 liiilliil 111111111 1ffili it liii1.(ot Ilo jill_,ill,,,,,,,r` 1.47 .PREFINISHED // COPING o . 0 . . • — , _ — 0 G 0 0 I C2 0 , 0 0 , 0 . _ I ' . 0 . 0$ . PRECAST CO PANEL - PAH' ( . . o- I o o ■ .PREFINISHED // COPING . , ' ;Inch "L. 77-fit L I. '0 ..1111i111111.011(111111111i11111111111111111,1116.11i11.11I111111111h1111111111111111111111.111111111111111041 I I I 1311111111.1111111H.111{11111.Iiill o = o o o = . , , 0 0 . _ I ' . , PRECAST CONC. - PAINT --- . I o PANEL o , I . , ' ;Inch "L. 77-fit L I. '0 ..1111i111111.011(111111111i11111111111111111,1116.11i11.11I111111111h1111111111111111111111.111111111111111041 I I I 1311111111.1111111H.111{11111.Iiill •0,00 2s 1" = 60 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 • NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM — BASIS OF DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET IN A CONCRETE UGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST. CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NOV029 ELEVATION 28.5 >,5 REVIS19111S, R1 3/17/99 ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE 911,FAIMNIIIIINIII:=====11 SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON moo 575-000 BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE.. CROSS SECTIONS DCSIGNEDr.STo .Aw N s S o I ,, NIS 111 : Co . 50* • DA17. /21/99 1410ACT MUSSER, . • CITYROECFETUIVKWID ILA PERMIT czwrai A1/1/03 NUNKIS APR 2 8 w..c CT. 1 or. 6 Lqq-0007 SPF C.D.E. EL. 31.06 40 - RIVER T 60' LO IMPACT ENVIRONMENT HIGH IMPACT ENWR011MENT 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT HIGH I61XCT ENVIRONMENT RIP OF EL 29.62 H1 �� I 15' ."1"' YP, NEW- �FAVISH GRADE. I TYP. CE OF F.S.OF-BLP ��- � FACF BUILDING f1F 100 29.67 MEAN HIGHWATER BUILDIVG EACE_OF L 5.5�R EL. 25.5 'ITP. w © BU EL. 25:53 w z Ld \ w EXIST. GRADE --7 r I— _ ~ J r —' r w z J LY Li a o i Li a w ao a w a -El -w H ,- Iw I f w In a to ' a i v w —� a a a w w a a Li 30' 30' -100 -50 0 1 +50.00 50 100 150 G. 200 EL. C.D.E. RNER40 ENVMT LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT - 60' - LOW IMPACT `I ` ` 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT HIGH I61XCT ENVIRONMENT RIP OF — EL 29.61 MEAN HIGHWATER �� 2 I' 32.00 NEW- �FAVISH GRADE. I TYP. CE OF ��- � �- 100 29.67 MEAN HIGHWATER BUILDIVG EACE_OF �— EL. 25.5 'ITP. w z © BU EL. 25:53 w z Ld \ w EXIST. GRADE --7 r I— _ w z I . r —' r w z J LY Li a I_ z a w ao a w a -El -w H ,- Iw I f w In a to ' E Lai I —� a a a w w a a Li 30' 30' -100 -50 50 0 +75.00 100 150 200 SPF G.U.E. EL. 31.0 1.-; 40' 40' RIVER NVMT M - 60' - LOW IMPACT `I ` ` 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMFNT RIP OF LEVEE, TYP. - 100 YEAR 1100' EL. 29.6 MEAN HIGHWATER �� 2 I' 32.00 J.. �` CE OF �- 100 29.67 MEAN HIGHWATER BUILDIVG EACE_OF �— EL. 25.5 w z © BU , EL. 25.65 w z � EL. 25.59 w --7 r I— w z I . r —' w z LY Li a I_ z a w ao KING CO . -w H - a E Lai I —� a RIVER ESMT. w w a a Li 30' 30' -I IU -T ❑IT' -50 0 50 0 +00.00 100 150 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 200 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 SPF C.O.E. EL. 31.15. 1.-; 40' - 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 40' RIVER - di, 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMFNT 100' HIGH IMPACT FMARONMFNT �� 32.00 J.. �` CE OF �- 100 29.67 MEAN HIGHWATER BUILDIVG EACE_OF �— 100 R EL. 29.64 MEAN HIGHWATER © BU EL. 25.62 EL. 25.65 w z � EL. 25.59 w - r —' w z z a w ao KING CO . -w H z w f r I- a w I a RIVER ESMT. w w a a 30' 30' -200 -150 -100 -50 0 3 +75.00 50 SPF C.O.E. EL. 31.12 __ - 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 40' RIVER - di, 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMFNT 100' HIGH IMPACT FMARONMFNT �� • �` �- BUILDIVG EACE_OF 1.. L. . EL 29.66 MEAN HIGHWATE 100 R EL. 29.64 MEAN HIGHWATER © BU EL. 25.62 EL. 25.59 w J —' .wz, J r z a Li z w f r I- a w I w a a 30' -200 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -150 -100 -50 0 3 +00.00 F.F. OF BLDG 0 F.F. OF BLDG. 50 100 150 200 SPF C.D.E. EL. 31.09 . 40' RIVER ENVMRT - 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT -FLOOD �� ` �- EACE_OF 100 R EL. 29.64 MEAN HIGHWATER © BU LDING EL. 25.59 ,IIII J —' — r I- a w I a a -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 2 +25.00 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET IN A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY.- MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGVD29 ELEVATION 28.5 100 • F.F. OF BLDG. 0 Inionmarneormartooragnecerwereammri .. REWISI ' R1 3/17/99 - ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MOO 575-taoo TITLE. •w.u. BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS • DESIGI€D STS PROJECT WISED DRAWN ID DRAVN SY. CKCNED IT. ISSUE RITE. SCK6 RAID HORZ: 1" - 30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1" a 10' DRIVING MICR, RECEIVED CITY OFTUKWILA APR 2 8 1999 PERMIT CENTER SI[ET. 2 .. 6 i I•, .I ,., ".P.:1 "T777.17r ,; 7.-1-7"1 111- i > ( '1 t I. `o.! IlnlpullnumnLnduulnumnl11��11inlnnlilidliiililiilulilunlmiliillluulunlunmu6ulUudluliuullin111n61��I1���1 , SPF C.D.E. EL. 3L24 40' _ F.I RIVER ENVM'T 60 LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT _. F.F. OF Bl 108 R -FLOOR FLOOD TOr OF Lt WCG FLOC& —.00 -- _ - FACE BUILT1ING ? 1, MIN., 1W. —� _ FACE OF IPII BUILDING EL 29.70 MEAN HIGHWATER ---.. r _ EL 29.E 8 MEAN HIGHWATFR BUI I EL. 29.71 __MEAN HIGHWATER EL. 25.77 r BUILDING w J w W Z J EL. 25.83 Z J FACED OF BOIL ING EL. 25.68 J Z w Z J w z H -1 >- >- Z I- W J } 1 J > Z w z W I-. Z w ti a w VAU Ilr I- CY Licem Ll.. U o KING CO. )— I.-. a LIJ w Q La La In a w w CL - T. RIVER ESMT. LJ f aJ a a 30'— 30' 30' 30' 35 30 25 20 15 10 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -50 0 50 6 +00.00 100 150 DG. 200 SPF C.O.E. EL. 31.21 40' EIIM'T _ F.I 100 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT RNE(j ENVM T 1DO�fFAR Fa 000 _. I '/ 108 R -FLOOR FLOOD WCG FLOC& —.00 -- _ w FACE BUILT1ING FACE BIIILDW F —� _ FACE OF IPII BUILDING EL 29.70 MEAN HIGHWATER ----100-YEAR EL. 29.73 MEAN HIGHWATER r _ EL 29.E 8 MEAN HIGHWATFR BUI I NG BUILDING L. 'Lb.11 w W Z J EL. 25.83 Z J w Z EL. 25.68 J Z w Z J H -1 >- >- Z I- W 1'- Z II J > I Z I-. Z w ti a w VAU Ilr I- CY Licem Ll.. U o KING CO. )— I.-. a LIJ rx Cw La La w CL - T. RIVER ESMT. LJ f aJ a 30'— 30' 30' 30' 0 5 +25.00 50 100 150 200 SPF E.U.E. EL, 31,18 r— _ 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT RNE(j ENVM T LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT� HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT I '/ 108 R -FLOOR FLOOD WCG FLOC& 1 -- w FACE BUILT1ING FACE BIIILDW F —� _ FACE OF IPII BUILDING ```- ----100-YEAR EL. 29.73 MEAN HIGHWATER EL. 29.74 MFAN HIGHWATFR EL 29.E 8 MEAN HIGHWATFR 7 BUILDING w EL 25.87 EL. 25.83 tti w Z EL. 25.68 J Z w Z J H -1 >- J J 1'- Z II J > I Z I-. Z w ti a w VAU Ilr I- CY Licem Ll.. KING CO, RIVER ESMT. 30' 1 Z w In w )— I.-. a LIJ rx Cw La La w CL - a- 10 a a f aJ a 30' 30' 30' 0 4 +50.00 50 100 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 150 OF BLDG. T. OF BLDG. 200 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 SPF C.D.E. EL, 31.33 r— 40' RIVER ENVM'T 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT F.F. I '/ 108 R -FLOOR F.F. WCG FLOC& 1 w FACE BUILT1ING FACE BIIILDW F —� _ FACE OF IPII BUILDING ----100-YEAR EL. 29.73 MEAN HIGHWATER EL. 29.74 MFAN HIGHWATFR 7 w EL 25.87 EL. 25.83 tti w Z W z J- J H -1 >- J J 1'- Z II J I-. Z w ti a w VAU Ilr I- CY Licem Ll.. KING CO, RIVER ESMT. 30' 1 Z w In w )— I.-. a LIJ E 1,1 I <7.- w CL - a- 10 a a w 30' 30' -200 -150 -100 -50 0 8 +25.00 50 100 50 OF BLDG. 0 SPF C.O.E. EL. 3130 r— ENVM'T - IS', I • TYP. ENVIRONMENT HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT I '/ F.F. WCG FLOC& TTP—� w FACE BUILT1ING NEW FINISH ' F —� _ FACE OF IPII BUILDING ----100-YEAR EL. 29.73 MEAN HIGHWATER EL. 9.7 EL. 29'72 EL.2-5.80�: _19 r ' w EL. 25.83 w Z J H -1 >- J J I-. Z w ti a w VAU Ilr I- CY Licem Ll.. KING CO, RIVER ESMT. 30' 1 Z w In w w CL - u CZ CL 30' -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 7 +50.00 100 C SPF CO E. EL. 31.27 40' RIVER ENVM; XIST • 'E TTP—� 32.04k- NEW FINISH ' —� _ FACE OF IPII BUILDING EL. 9.7 EL. 29'72 EL.2-5.80�: _19 r ' w 0 H -1 >- J VAU Ilr I- CY Licem Ll.. KING CO, RIVER ESMT. 30' 1 Z w In w -200 -150 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET IN A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGVD29 ELEVATION 28.5 -100 -50 6 +75.00 50 1D0 0 OF BLDG. 0 0 F.F. OF BLDG. RCVIII76 R1 3/17/99 - ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE SEGALE BUS /NESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON cta, 575-ton TITLE. BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS aszel MIMEO h. PRCJCCT MMICA PRAWN IT. PRAWN IT °tow, m Isar PATE, SCALD DATE, HORZ: 1" - 30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1• 10' DNAWINO MISER. RECEIVED CITY OFTUKWILA APR 2 8 1999 PERMIT CENTER seca. 3 v. 6 0 In<R 'aYr'mrvrpr . Si '—'71 II El .I 01 . 767 j.'"_� —� -Q. ' t I �.9:i hndu111nnmRlmliuRlunmllhndlil Ilmluillnuhm11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111iiiibi dIIRIIIIj*I SPF EL 31 2 RNER I ENVMi -60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT —100-VW-FLOOD EL. 2936 uEAN- HIGHWATER - ---100 YEAR -.FLOE EL. 29.75 MEAN HIGHWATER LOW ENVIRONMENT -_ w J - ME NT F.F. OF 81.0 OP OF LLVtt, 1W. - I I.! 1 1, BUILEDING 9C_.DIr - FACE EL. 25.93 A. Li BUILDING IL. 26.05 1911-YfAR--FU • EL. 29.78 1.4EANAIGHWATFR c J 100 - R- FLO00- 29.81 MEAN HIGHWATER z w z EL. 29.79 -OF BUILDING _ —EL. 26.08 EL. 25.97 KING CO. -I i V) I w II w H Z w Li j -I La vi a w z a a RIVER ESMT. tz Li 12. z w a J >- ix II I- z -1 } 30' o w ce w - r L N CI M D_ Z' Li -Li w w ' Q. 30' a CL n. 30' 30' -150 -100 -50 0 50 10 +50.00 100 150 200 SPF C.O.E. EL, 3139 40 RIVEFT1 ENVM'T F.I 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT F —100-VW-FLOOD EL. 2936 uEAN- HIGHWATER - ---100 YEAR -.FLOE EL. 29.75 MEAN HIGHWATER LOW ENVIRONMENT -_ w J - I, 1, z M J NT F.F. OF 81.0 OP OF LLVtt, 1W. - I I.! 1 1, BUILEDING 9C_.DIr - EL. 25.93 A. Li BUILDING IL. 26.05 c J 100 - R- FLO00- 29.81 MEAN HIGHWATER z w z EL. 29.79 _ —EL. 26.08 T I— w KING CO. -I i V) I w II H Z w I-.. z -I La vi a w z a a RIVER ESMT. tz Li 12. z w a L ix II -1 } 30' o w ce w s w a w ' Q. 30' a 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -150 -100 -50 0 9 +75.00 50 100 150 200 F.F. OF BLDG. OF BLDG. SPF C.D.E. EL, 31.36 40 RIVER ENVM'T 15', 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT VP, 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT F F.F. OF BLE - ---100 YEAR -.FLOE EL. 29.75 MEAN HIGHWATER LOW ENVIRONMENT 60' - IMPACT - I, 1, z M J NT F.F. OF 81.0 OP OF LLVtt, 1W. _ — I I.! 1 1, IN., IYP. 9C_.DIr `FACE 0 BUILDING TV A. BUILDING IL. 26.05 100 - R- FLO00- 29.81 MEAN HIGHWATER EL. 25.'1 w z EL. 29.79 _ —EL. 26.08 A- I- LI z BUILDING 1 1 H Z w I-.. z -I La vi a w z tz Li 12. z w a L ix II -1 } o w ce w s w a w ' Q. 30' a CL n. -50 9 +00.00 50 100 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S, NO, 15033 .F. OF BLDG. 150 200 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 EN' E.D.E. EL, 31,51 RIVER ENVM• LOW ENVIRONMENT IMPACT I HIGHIIMPACT ENVIRONMENT F.F. OF BLE - - LOW ENVIRONMENT 60' - IMPACT - 100' •:.. HIGH IMPACT H.ENVIRONM GRADE, TYP. NT F.F. OF 81.0 OP OF LLVtt, 1W. _ — -FACE-0 -- NG G XISI z J `FACE 0 BUILDING TV A. C IL. 26.05 100 - R- FLO00- 29.81 MEAN HIGHWATER w z EL. 29.79 _ —EL. 26.08 A- I- LI z BUILDING 1 1 w z J I-.. z -I La vi a w z I- w L ix II -1 } o w ce a_ o s w a w Q. a CL n. 5 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 • -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 12 +75.00 G, TYP. 0 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 12 +00.00 G, TYP. 0 SPF C.D.E. EL, 31.45 SPF CA.E. EL. 31.48 100-WAR-FWD EL. 29.80 MEAN HIGHWATER 1111111111111r.."- �, 40' RIVER ENVM'T - - LOW ENVIRONMENT 60' - IMPACT - 100' •:.. HIGH IMPACT H.ENVIRONM GRADE, TYP. NT F.F. OF 81.0 OP OF LLVtt, 1W. _ — -FACE-0 -- NG G XISI _ C IL. 26.05 p,..o w z EL. 29.79 _ A- I- LI z BUILDING w z J I-.. z EYEI 6 OGHWATER_ w z I- w L -1 } a_ o s w a w a CL n. -200 -150 -100 -50 0 12 +00.00 G, TYP. 0 SPF C.D.E. EL, 31.45 40' RIVER Ll, LOW ENVIRONMENT 60 IMPACT 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT F.F. OF B OP OF LLVtt, 1W. _ C p,..o EL. 29.79 _ A- I- LI z BUILDING EYEI 6 OGHWATER_ w z -1 } a w CL n. 30' -200 -150 -100 -50 0 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET IN A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGVD29 ELEVATION 28.5 11 +25.00 150 LDG. RIIIIIIRIMITRMITVIPRPORINIIIRMINITIRMI R1 3/17/99 - ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON moo 575 -8000 TITLE. BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS ;scr.uor.•riaL;::wN.caas.eie:1 10101[) It. . MELT NUMBED DRAWN SD MAIN )T, MIXED R, ISSUC MTG SCALE, DASD HORZ: 1" = 30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1" = 10' LISAWINS •J IcR, RECEIVED CRY OF TUKWILA APR 2 8 1999 PERMIT CENTE4 SHIED OD • _ i'; O Inn • U nI • 11.'• vv/ rrrc' r • l Gi Ci Et 1 UI E 1 S?- � L• L I• D L.. I i I J I Lui�uuL i I i I w� uluu� I u�w i �uuLm�nulnu�uuLul�uui i -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 14+25.00 100 150 BLDG, TYP. 200 1...-- 40' RIVER rtylarr 40' — RIVER ENVIA'T 6' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT I-40' . .. RIVER ' ENACT 60' LOW IMPACT EWRONMENT HIGH ENVIRONMENT IMPACT .. ---7, njui„,, 111 F.F. OF BLDG. SIT CIEI: EL. 31.6 100—YEARILO I EL. 29.88 MEAN HIGHWATER 11111111graill V -'"IIIII E_O 111111101. BUILDING ..sPF C.0 EL. 31,54 /\ , VP. F.F. OF BL L 1111111,4 ›--j z t.LI -.2 t I. srF EL. 3.1.i \ Tf12_0F srr c.0.E EL. 31.6C TYP l.L1 ‹ F.F. OF iiir • ' ---400--YEAR-FLOO) \ _FVEF 11/41111 cr EL. 26.12 LLI z .--. V EMI :/ :1 EL 29.84 MEAN HIGHWATER ,IG L., 7 -N. t- Li _ _ Li ¢ EL. 26.15 BUILD' La z I- . . I=I LY fa. t...t z • n )- . z w - ....t t--- z m LAJ illi _IA v, LA I-- w z L., M CL -64. a u., cr u.i --, L -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 14+25.00 100 150 BLDG, TYP. 200 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 13+50.00 • 100 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 150 G, TYP. 200 55 4 4 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1...-- 40' RIVER rtylarr LOW ENVIRONMENT 60' IMPACT 100' HIGH IMPACT ENRON/Leff I-40' . .. RIVER ' ENACT 60' LOW IMPACT EWRONMENT HIGH ENVIRONMENT IMPACT .. ---7, njui„,, 111 F.F. OF BLDG. SIT CIEI: EL. 31.6 100—YEARILO I EL. 29.88 MEAN HIGHWATER 11111111graill V -'"IIIII E_O 111111101. BUILDING ..sPF C.0 EL. 31,54 /\ , VP. F.F. OF BL 1111111,4 ›--j z t.LI -.2 t I. 1, Mk,* Tf12_0F srr c.0.E EL. 31.6C TYP l.L1 ‹ AI I • SIC EL 29.83 MEAN HIGHWATER iiir • ' F CE OF BUILDING F _FVEF 11/41111 cr EL. 26.12 LLI z .--. EMI :/ :1 I- z id s- ,IG -N. t- Li _ _ Li ¢ BUILD' EL 26.18 . . I=I LY fa. t...t z • ....t t--- z I-- w z L., -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 13+50.00 • 100 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 150 G, TYP. 200 55 4 4 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 15+75.00 50 200 rT40 RIVER ENVN'T 100' 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT I-40' . .. RIVER ' ENACT 60' LOW IMPACT EWRONMENT HIGH ENVIRONMENT IMPACT .. ---7, njui„,, 111 F.F. OF BLDG. SIT CIEI: EL. 31.6 100—YEARILO I EL. 29.88 MEAN HIGHWATER 11111111graill V -'"IIIII E_O 111111101. BUILDING /\ 1111111,4 ›--j z t.LI Tf12_0F srr c.0.E EL. 31.6C TYP l.L1 ‹ • ' F _FVEF 11/41111 cr EMI :/ `'---,...._FAGE-or-------------- ,IG . _ _ -200 -150 -100 -50 0 15+75.00 50 200 -200 -150 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET IN A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGV029 ELEVATION 28.5 -100 -750 0 15+00.00 . OF BLDG. 0 " ITRirmrtrrr!.71TP195717fIrrIfint nr4 REVISIONS. R1 3/17/S9 — ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE (41-')* 4a.f SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON caw 575-z000 frilr,11 UM, BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS .NDTREMITRa-i-O7 TCSIGICI IT. PROJECT RUMOR DRAWN AN MANN 10 OVOCtb IT, ISSUE IWO WAD DAM HORZ: 1" 30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1" 10 DRANDO MAKIN RECEIVED CRY OF TUKWILA APR 2 8 1999 PERMIT CENTER "ET' 5 - 6 ••• I '9. •Li ' • Y/t.'"Tc'fr:r • • ' • • 01 • I ; I ci rT40 RIVER ENVN'T 60' LOW IMPACT EWRONMENT 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT .. ---7, /\ Tf12_0F srr c.0.E EL. 31.6C TYP • ' F _FVEF :/ `'---,...._FAGE-or-------------- ,IG 1 YEAR- FLOOD EL 29.85 MEAN HIGHWATER BUILD' EL 26.18 t...t z • ....t t--- z I-- w z L., -64. a u., cr u.i L .__ . -200 -150 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET IN A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGV029 ELEVATION 28.5 -100 -750 0 15+00.00 . OF BLDG. 0 " ITRirmrtrrr!.71TP195717fIrrIfint nr4 REVISIONS. R1 3/17/S9 — ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE (41-')* 4a.f SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON caw 575-z000 frilr,11 UM, BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS .NDTREMITRa-i-O7 TCSIGICI IT. PROJECT RUMOR DRAWN AN MANN 10 OVOCtb IT, ISSUE IWO WAD DAM HORZ: 1" 30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1" 10 DRANDO MAKIN RECEIVED CRY OF TUKWILA APR 2 8 1999 PERMIT CENTER "ET' 5 - 6 ••• I '9. •Li ' • Y/t.'"Tc'fr:r • • ' • • 01 • I ; I ci -100 . -50 16 +50.00 50 100 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 150 200 50 45 40 35 30 25 20, 15' 10 5 RIVER ENVM'T LOW ACT HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT LOW ¶PACT ENVIRONMENT HIGH 100' ENVIRONMENT • EXIST. GRADE, TYP. ReE_C.O F SPF -C:13.E EL, 31.6° EL. 31.67 TOr% LLVtL, IYP. TYP, r 115' NEW FINISP _ GRADE, TY EL. 29.89 MEAN HIGHWATER 1, VIN., TYP. LL'26:26 w 2100- MEAN HIGHWATER W Z EL. 26.30 1 I-- ac w Lo W Z _a C7 _0 W Z J f.. W F tx a LI a a C3 CY a -100 . -50 16 +50.00 50 100 MICHAEL G. MIX P.L.S. NO. 15033 150 200 50 45 40 35 30 25 20, 15' 10 5 -200 -150 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM. IS A BRASS DISC SET IN • A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGVD29 ELEVATION 28.5 -100 -50 0 17 +25.00 50 150 0 REVISIONS, .. . REVISIONS, R1 3/17/99 — ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON moo DTs -DOOo TITLE. BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS DESIGNED ►Ti PT ,LCT WRIER, DRAWN ►T. DRAWN IT CHECKED IT. ISSUE DATE. SCALE. DATE. HORZ: 1" .•30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1" - 10 DIIAVINS /MICR, CITYR • CFf.... APR 2 PERN CRRCEVEMM . G y, 6 APR 1 5 1999 PERMITCENTER O 4- 771.c"tI ,,,,I;„ i I i l. RIVER LOW ¶PACT ENVIRONMENT HIGH 100' ENVIRONMENT • T___Ei11, ReE_C.O F EL. 31.67 TYP, r 115' 10 YEAR-FLOOD ? 1, VIN., TYP. 2100- MEAN HIGHWATER EL. 26.30 W Z _a Z J f.. W F LI a a C3 CY a -200 -150 NOTES: VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF DATUM. IS A BRASS DISC SET IN • A CONCRETE LIGHT STANDARD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S. 180TH ST. AND SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. MARKED (N 254 RESET 2 1974) NGVD29 ELEVATION 28.5 -100 -50 0 17 +25.00 50 150 0 REVISIONS, .. . REVISIONS, R1 3/17/99 — ADDED RIVERSIDE PROFILE SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON moo DTs -DOOo TITLE. BUILDING 981 SHORELINE PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS DESIGNED ►Ti PT ,LCT WRIER, DRAWN ►T. DRAWN IT CHECKED IT. ISSUE DATE. SCALE. DATE. HORZ: 1" .•30' 1/21/99 VERT: 1" - 10 DIIAVINS /MICR, CITYR • CFf.... APR 2 PERN CRRCEVEMM . G y, 6 APR 1 5 1999 PERMITCENTER O 4- 771.c"tI ,,,,I;„ i I i l. Xt•..$ / N62. 54' ..515" W 4 / v • • • N 66' 11" , .... , Petoto), 15' WATER MITS. #7412200369, 7803020870. 7904171207 10+1 .14' ..,.• , . ._ 62.58i RI r,:. `............. "*". . -.., . ,' :7., 2x2. SO CONC COLUMN, TYP CONC RETAINING WALL w/WROUGHT IRON FENCE ABOVE, SEE STRUCTURAL MANS FOR DETAILS ,A EX STREET UGHT TO BE RELOCATED A RELOCATED STREET UGHT (LOCATION APPROX) I / A WROUGHT IRON FENCE CONCRETE HOLD DOWN SLAB FOR (1) 6,000 GAL & (1) 18,000 GAL UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS, SEE PLANS BY OTHERS FOR DETAILS *2•,„ CONCRETE FUEL ISLAND WITH OVERHEAD CANOPY, SEE PLANS I/ BY OTHERS FOR DETAILS ■ 8.5' BLDG. 763 I • 66. .44.# •••••-• • ..F. s' • ---.... ; • BLDG. 752 / NEW STREET UGHT ,, (LOCATION APPROX) ""- .8•, TYP -1 4' BLDG. 734 A WALL rrp, A CONC RETAINING WALL w/WROUGHT IRON FENCE ABOVE, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS 4 CV.4 WITH EX CW A RELOCATE CURI310-SOUTH ... TO ADO 3 SPACES STREET,UGHT VI 0 .4 0 6.1 0 a 0. UI 0 E g g a 6 0) 0) DALE: April 15, Mc, c. )57°3 43' 25. __Ib+69,93 RIVER PROTECTION EASEMENTS 5222051, 6027013, 6027015, 9110310987, 6014672, & K.C. RES. # 31633 • .. TOP OF' LEVEE, TYP GREEN RIVER I EXPIRES: 01/27/01 I 10P OF BANK I • TO RIVER — 35 rrp. VARIES 66. • DEMO 10' 30' 50' 100' 0' 20' 40' 75' SCALE: I" • 50' DATUM: NOVD 1929 /Pi<<\ TYP VARIES <(\ TYP. VARIES • — • TOP OF LEVEE, TYP RIVER PROTECTION EASEMENTS NO'S, 5222051, 6027013, 6027015, 9110310981, 6014672 & X.C. RES. #31633 CORRECTION 6 ■ -WTCreff! • • , 600H604110111610600611111111011111100111161111111101111611.1161111604040P1. cnyROFErivALA I)(.1 P q 1999 P810,61 (TENTER MI99-0 =Ft 0 uJ F- 0) PROJECT NO. 321-03 REVISION NO, SHEET NO. C2.0 OF DALE OF PRINT DEC 0 9 1999 CURVE DATA 0 0 = 420.00 A • 04 28' 23 I. . 32.79 0 F. • 420.00 A • 15• 15' 11" L • 111.81 0 IL = 1600.00 A • 10' 03' 54" I. • 281.06 ® 0 = 215.00 A • 29' 11' sr L • 109,57 (-5) R = 742,00 A • 37• 06' 44" L • 158.75 (6) ti = 227,00 A • 33' 45' 42". I. • 133,76 0 R = 360.00 A 4 07' 51' sr I. • 49.39 0 R - C07,50 A • 34' 11' or L .4 362.45' ®n = 50.00 A = 91' 32' 50" L • 79.89 TYP. VARIES • — • TOP OF LEVEE, TYP RIVER PROTECTION EASEMENTS NO'S, 5222051, 6027013, 6027015, 9110310981, 6014672 & X.C. RES. #31633 CORRECTION 6 ■ -WTCreff! • • , 600H604110111610600611111111011111100111161111111101111611.1161111604040P1. cnyROFErivALA I)(.1 P q 1999 P810,61 (TENTER MI99-0 =Ft 0 uJ F- 0) PROJECT NO. 321-03 REVISION NO, SHEET NO. C2.0 OF DALE OF PRINT DEC 0 9 1999 ?* .,CB,..1 ••TYPE 2 60" DIA CUT INTO EX 24' SD RIM -24.21 INV -16.99 (EX 24`E/W)EX A/C PVMT INV -17.49 (18"S) INV -18.32 (8'sw) PRECAST CURB INLET PER STD PLAN OS -1 RIM -22.14 RIM =22.09 RIM -44:35 NOT CONST UC ED - INV =20.91 8" SAN INV•16.8 8 24' SD • IE -22.15 WALL STA 0 +00 Ek CB. TYPE 2 547017 RIM =26t INV =17.60 (18 "S) 221F -850, INV=17,10 (24 "E) WALL EX CB REPLACE GRATE W/ SOUD METAL COVER RIM= 22,14 EX SD MH RIM -24.42 (RAISE TO MATCH FG) INV=16.47 (36 "E /W) INV =17,03 (18 "N) INV- 16,60j4'S) • L CB 11, TYPE I SEGALE DRIVE "C" RIM -45+9 25.80 INV- 21.3101NW) EX A/C PVMT I 1t ' I ;,I . . CB 20, TYPE 2 `I .: I CONNECT TO EX 12 SD J, , L._ - .Ea9Mu.ORTh - - r.; R1M =22.66 .'•'s "' INEEV -18.54 (12'N /S) EX SD MH• 17 ""1" I ` RM =22'3PMDL RIM =23.33 I B+e90A' INV =16.38 (12 "N) N INV =16.5 3 i�00 I INV=16.47 INV =16.10 4"N) • INV " I -.:..-L--- - 2 1.F -t2" 90, INV =16,lO. (18'E) I S- 0.0032 FT/ ta Ex CB EX SD MH 8 RIM =22.52 EX RIM -22.41 INV =16.99 (12 "S) RAISE RIM TO 25.9 (FA) INV =17.04 (12 "N) INV =16.67 (12 "N) -DEMO ts6 "N-)- - - INV =16.68 (12 "SW) :. 1 .; r. 1..`, _.. I "INV =16:08 (18"4-DEMO -RN. -t .46- (W'SAA9 -- - - ----!-t •_ ...'. 17LF -18" SD 5 -0.005 FT FT CPS -EC MODEL 612 -SA ILLIfT8,4A) OUTLET -18.24 EX A/C PVM iffrwir 05 F i � ���'� .��■��� ®��I�yu.�,.,, 0.�: /FT we Gr 6� L 0,01 =W 77Lf1- 0 sio.ot FT " i / 1,CP ` 12 8' 401E SD, `1 CB 18 TYPE 1' 5 =0.01 FT /FT ' / RIM -25;66 25.20 ,. 7:115' INV -21.73 (12'FgW)1 • SD CLEANOUT r ^ END I ° 2JLFr6' Sp, 5-0.01 FT /FT CPS -NW MODEL 712 -SA : RIM =77 INLET -18.74 i.__.._.._..._.._.... _; OUTLET= 18.54 TX CB RIM =25.82 1NV=23.47 (12 "W) INV =23.22 (12 "E) INV =24.42 (2'W) 12LF -8 "SD, S =0.01 FT /FT ,L CB 3 TYPE 2 48' DIA RIM -2}9O 29.90 INV -tt52 (18 "N /S) 19.54 INV -21.41 (4' w) 10' 30' O 20' 45 SCALE: 1' = 30' DATUM: NGVD 1929 NV -19.11 -8' SD, S =0,012 L (: 17 TYPE 2 8' WI FCS, SEE_ + RIM -9560 .30 INy =20.96 (121w) INV -20.90 (65) INV -20.90 (12'E) 10011 -8" SD, S =0.02 FT FT p ' INV =20.78 SHT C5.2 CPS-WC MODEL 577 -6 -SA RIM -25.7 (FA INLET -20.38 OUTLET =20.18 _, 100 ' B' SD, S 100.F- 2" 00tF -12" SO CB 21 TYPE 2, 48'DIAL1 n/ FCS, SEE DETAIL SF YC5.2 RIM= 28760 25,15 INV =18.64 (12 "E/W) II;V =18.64 (6'S) CB 23, RIM -2568 INV -20.65 66' 31' 2'(" W 121.E -6 SD, 5 =0,01 FT /FT SD CLEANOUT INV - 18.52 f- 100LF- 8'1GD, S= .025 FT /FT S =0.01 FT /FT INV INV IN -18.92 I8.92 =18.92 Z,24LF -4" ADS N -12, 5-0.01 ft /ft IE -21.65 WALL STA 1 +68 N 0 66LF -8" SD & ADDED CB TYPE I RIM -30,30 ,, CONC RETAINING WALL 1 w /WROUGHT IRON FENCES 60' ABOVE, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS QQ CB 4, TYPE 2, 48' 01A RIM -28:80 31.70 INV -28.+4 (18 "N /S) 20.13 INV -20.64 (12"E) Qt 6OLF -8" SD ADDED CB TYPE t RIM -30,55 EX Si Mrt RIM -25.31 NV= 16.67 (24 "N /W) CB 10 TYPE 2, 48" RIM -26:6+ 27,00 1 INV =19.51 (12 "NE) INV=19.29 (12'NW) 0 SD CO RIM =31.10 6" SD S =1% MIN 0.025 FT /FT 025 FT /FT Q1 RIM -25:66 25.15 INV -19.65 (12 "E, S' 5' S-1% 1% MIN D5 S-1% 1% SD CLEANOUT INV -23.16 Vs‘lb Sp, SD CLEANOUT S-I% MIN INV -2I.16 46LF -12" CMP SLOT DRAIN CB 13, TYPE i ..�! RIM -30;95 31.06 9 � 114V =25.98 (12') 6' S0, 5 =1% MIN &CO 14, Trn I MM •3F30 INV.27:59 -(4- 1N) k4V 20.90 (12' OUT) NOT CONSTRUCTED 4" SD, 5.2% MIN 13+00 SD CLEANOUT INV =24.00 48" DIA CB 16 TYPE 2 W /SOLID COVER RIM =25.60 INV =17.05 (121/W) INV =16.55 (18"N) INV =19,03 (6 "SW) INV =17.55 (6 "SE) INV =17.05 (I2 'S) 60" DIA BUILDING 981 CB 8, TYPE 2. RIM =30.80 INV =24.67 (12 ") 48' DIA 6' SD, 5 =1% MIN SD CLEANOUT 114V -21.16 CB 16A TYPE 2 48' DIA W /SOLID COVER RIM -28.00 (FA) INV -18.30 (12 "N) NV -18.66 (8 'E /W) ADDED CB Q EX CB LI CB 5, TYPE 2, 48' DIA RIM =30:30 30.95 �. INV =2063 (18'N) 20.74 INV -21.33 (12'E) INV =23.41 (4" W) EX CB. TYPE 2 (48" DIA) RIM=29.5t\ INV =21.98 (12 "SW) INV =21.28 (18 "0) 5=0,0057 CB 9 TYPE 1 RIM -30.72 INV =25.72 (12 ") �\ I V =26.22 (6') (DRAINAGE PLAN WEST, SHT 5.0) MATCHLINE A (DRAINAGE PLAN EAST, SHT 5.1) 4 SD, S =2% MIN 6' SD, 5, MIN, TYP tn in i DESIGNED:. JAS W U U 0) 01 rn DATE: April 15, In ()N j1 CL ,5-1.? 2 c N S9 - ♦ • 0 o e2 •(n Cso`4 o • o c 461.) s RECEIVED CITY OF nIIIWRA DEC R 9 1999 PERMIT CENTER z -� ... - 59LF -12" SD, 1E43.94 5 =0.00 WALL STA 4+28L\ ADDED C Di ' \EX CB RIM =25.86 INV=22.19 (12" SW /NE) 0 WALL STA 5 +29 . CB 6, TYPE 2 (48" DIA) • RIM -30.95 INV =22.40 (12') /7/// �I IE -26.0 WALL STA 5 +29 i. • 0 Inch ',11111" 1 • . I; I EXPIRES: 01/27/01 plena have been reviewed by with currant MC trees reepenmIM tar o erna wi h cn and standards. Aaep11rt0e of ansalons which do IlaNbthe ,( Ogled ctendards or hats t, lathe cd9quacV of r rev. •0 dell ncct .\ddItlion$, Yeld 1. "a adrawing'. ilt rcqulreha of re,, age is subsequent (,ILL fit acceppiers N sub010 tic. It* Public Wale WIN alopecia 12 13 9R BY: SD - ONLY HIGH LI KTDs cn7 v e- R..D t3 911 01 LI JI 8 • I 1 S- F`L t I a ., 1 IgIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111NI1111111N1111114N1k111111111111 1) IIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIII1IIIII111111IIIIII illi1IIIIII1g11111111111111111111111 111 , . ctIonby W t-TT=MS RS's PBt'pQM LI P,g..L4jN6 r3g.AINRGE knDEA RSEt9A4re I \ 8M ti, PERMIT PLAN SET - SUBJECT TO City REVIEW PROJECT NO. 321 -03 REVISION NO. 1 SHEET NO. C5.0 OF OATS OF PRINT DEC o 91999 STA. 0 +00 CONNECT TO DRAIN TILE 2411 27.21 ro 1 '1 C) Fr) al x t1•IlIMIlZtI 167%712:4 72M01 tE077n7A g,pnq,D7,: 14tq� 13118►14•1[11621.1",1 r _SEG_A_LE PARK DRIVE " C" 66' 31' 27" W— ...�_......_..___..__._... 567,2U' • emr4-1T1s f30B7f1s7fJ,4.z1 awm: „ [ W12tltrii00.Cffn2 [UNi'YHtJ➢uM71t21fSdHJmaP1.n ` 22.23 44.44 - 20.16 `71.06 STA. 1 +84 21.4 WROUGHT IRON FENCE 100' HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT CONNECT TO DRAIN TILE STA. 3 +56.50• 2'x2' SQ. COLUMN, TYP. 162.51 TRENCH 60,16 DRAIN 1 RETAINING WALL W/ Ite WROUGHT RON FENCE OVE CATCHw Gab • BASIN, TYP. 21.70 BUILDING 981 u2 .71.70 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT STA. 5 +29 MEAN HIGH • WATER MARK 40' RIVER ENVIRONMENT .ti • I II __._ .,... ,,,� 7_._:_;�� , ii , I'1, . 1.1: �',,, ICI i T'T ?: r., m,�)�, -: I • 0 mm me . 1 F2' ..;�i+ T .: y a •. [. 3 6 !1 -Y yf TY` .r Y I' S1)ultlulllll21 E ( IIIIIfI11IIIIIIIiIlIi11111111IIiIIIIIIlI111111111I1111{ IIIIIIIIIIn11InRhllillluhrnlglillnl� 11/3/99— INCORPORATE COMMENTS FROM TUKWILA PLAN REVIEW SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (201) 178 -2360 >md 981 BUILDING WEST RETAINING WALL PLAN RECEIVED CITY O' 7UKWIU Nov 12 1999 PERMIT CENTEFI 02320NO2 Nh PROJECT N1NBO0 dMWTI BO MOO F2F, PDA SITEWALL [2112610 RP, 700E DATE: SCAM 1" = 50' wm 9/30/99 01A2 0 x6118216 ace' 1 0R 1 O: \NINOOAS \TEI'\NALL.dwg 10/04/99 00:59:56 stevev NEW F.G. AT EAST SIDE OF. WALL, TYP. 00 T.O.F. 23.34 0 T.O.F. 24.50 PRECAST CAP, TYP. T EXIST GRADE AT WEST SIDE OF WALL, TYP. T.O.F. 25.67 WROUGHT IRON FENCE, UP. waft MINN • T.O.F. 24.83 • • • • • T.O.F. 24.50 eau • • • ■.,ww- • • i gnu • • • • T.O.F. 25.17 T.O.F. 26,33 T.O.F. 27.17 to D CIN p OF ECE TUIVEKWILA NOV 1 2 1999 PERMIT CENTER SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON pas) ms-z000 1711.0 WEST RETAINING WALL (EXPIRES W20/ Oa COWED Rl/ M,UJOCT %%RCM DRAWN Ca MO FM PDA WALL oNCacm m, ssrt uCR SCAM 1" = 10' DA'B' 9/30/99 DMMWO NUNBDU 0 inch,:' �S'pne n siL . DICi EI At, 1 U1 -0 t :. S s lt .,t . I o { . �i1RlUll�lllllllll�lllllllpllllllllU�lIR41R�111111111�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIUIIIII�uullUl�lllllNll�nillini� r, .1,1'. T,I7'"';;ti' f'-11i!P.nTnn »r,.r. oath on 1 . RETAINING WALL SCHEDULE H MAX. •T A P .D • K L •H ,BARS •.:BARS V .:.33AR5' Z : 9 33AR5. �'•.; `703 ";. ;1;71r: i43',"•7 '.04" -; ;:30'7•: •:.5815.4'4130707 ± Vim ':•;i 040187.; 6' 10• 1•-0" -4' =9" • 14" 18" • j'5015 ".. 45070° 45010'. 44018" 4' 8" 1'-0" 2' -10" 12" 16" 44012• 44010' {4010• 44O1B" i f;' ";�.'Ti=i1 l HOLD 0 0 2 "CLR. 0rcp S. V BARS H BARS 18" MIN: FREE DRAINING FILL : cag 7,0 8c/ gr B2 I PROP RTY LINE 'r3) at'1 =:3' TANG.. 11NTHi'FR.:ARCH. ,. s • .' •': t11DCATE,PER •YJ2CH: "1ENCEPER ARCH. IIIIIIIIIINIillil 1 r1F -1C =�� :rrT -T— l= I- 11 =4 =1 'ice— C.I.P. WALL BEYOND EXP. JT. STOP ALL WALL REINF g3 ® 0 12 "o /c PLAN 0 PROPERTY • LINE 77/8" CRUSHED ROCK BEDDING MATERIAL - 4" MIN. 0 BOTTOM, 6° MIN. 0 TOP k SIDES B 3ARS {f4 CONT. SECTION A © RETAINING WALL 4" N -12 PERFORATED PIPE 8 Os VERT. EXP. Jr. STOP ALL • WALL.REINF —PLAN 8 43 E RES.O 70P lc •BDT. . -BALANCE* 12% • FOOTING PER SECT. A� • 1 , N •,c" • — # Q,•. ��J-�) . . d • "' -• . • • D •;• - • • NIVO SECTION 13' @ RETAINING WALL: i" - 1' -O RETAINING WALL .ELEVATION .1" CRY Scr WM µl)V 151999 (‘IEjT CENTER Rfl9SIuNSt 1/3/99- INCORPORATE COMMENTS FROM TUKWILA PLAN REVIEW, SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA. WASHINGTON Lax) 573-20ro WEST RETAINING WALL E6 NED ftt MINH St PDA uQa® M PRCUELT M c WALL 6171E WE• SUED DAM 1" = 10' •9/30/99 MC 12 MUIR MEET: 2 Cet 2 TI. II it sI .' Ft ..ti a L. UI p t i S -.G L . 1 I IlIIIIIUIIIinluulnlilRUlunbullilil�Iill� IIdIRIIIUIhIIiIRRIuRIIIIIIRR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIpIIIUIII (IRIglillllil, `, 1 0 EXISTING BUILDING 43-\ )V\ • NEW RETAINING • WALL 11111111111 c' IN BUILDING 981 100' HIGi IMPACT ENVIRONMEIC • 60' LOW IMPACT ENVIRONMENT MEAN HIGH WATER MAR)( 40 RIVER ENVIRONMENT --' L /018C•Ct SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (oe) are-2� BUILDING 981 REVISED SITE PLAN DESIDED CR PAO= NU11808 MON MI 6O HIM PDA • REVISIONS o= 811 ISWJE WALE MM = 50' 10/7/99 DIVANKi MAUR: 'HEET' 1 Ce., 1 ,-,-.7•:'-•...:41,1•*( • • I • • "-- • "' --411v!vr.- • • • p Li Li, 7:77,—, 17, • „ . „.., ImilmiLi..1.1111.111111.11111111111110701;110111101111.0L1110'011;11110i10010I011:01011100100100110.00t1001001 8 A. 0+10 90 BEND 3/4" CHAMFER ALL EDGES, TYP. A. 0 +74 BEND 0 0 0 B.O.F. 22.00 1 1/2 FEATURE STRIP (2-3/4''CHAMFER)- AT 8' CENTERS 4" WEEP HOLE AT 8' CENTERS EAST RETAINING WALL EAST ELEVATION 10/14/99 F.G. 1 6.00 0.83 h( SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON we) em-woo BUILDING 981 EAST RETAINING WALL MMMED en ME M MAIM MMIM m CMG nn PDA EWALL aaioo en MOM OM edac 1/4" = 1' MOD 10/15/90 mown MAIM ! ,•. tr mC7T�m r si• Gl Ei— Ei t' ;6I D 1 r77,-S ..f,,--" '_ I Il liullhlnllildillllnlllllnlllnlnni�ill�ollmllliiliiiilbinlulllnlimlilllnlnulnuluil6nllnullndlulllin� Inlillilli�J �� I 60 Thula PKomidalls 14 Euonymus Alola 'Compacts' PRIVATE OUTDOOR OPEN AREA SCALE: 1 " =15' Rock Outcroppings docedru 10 Ilex Crenala Convex° 5 Euon us Mato 'Com, acts' '.a r,s4e,odo C Erica Cornea 'Kam 30 Prunu Junlperus Old Cold 20 Rhododendr OW A 5 Rhodo Elizabeth Erica Cameo 'Sommers Red' Eck 2 Fo•u 5 volica 'Purpureo 21 Prunus Laurocerasus Eck Oltoluyken' 10 Ilex Crenate Comm IO Solrnea Bulmoda Anthony Waterer Rook Outcroppings 5 Compacts' � A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1— SHOW EASEMENT 4/22/99 2— CHANGES PER CITY OF TUKWILA W/ MODIFICATIONS 5/19/99 16 Rhododendron Anah Kruschke 28 Viburnum Dovidi 4 Pinus Nigro 10 Prunus Laurocerasus 'Oltoluyken' 5 Rhodo GW VAULT 10 Ilex Crenate Convex° 4 Fagus Stivatico ;Purpureo' 17 Ilex Genola Convexa Korn.ners Red' ?Co o easter Lowlasl GREEN RIVER 14 Prunus Laurocerasus 'Ottoluyken' PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL SEGALE BUSINESS PARK QTY ABBR. BOTANICAL NAME 0 12 CD` Colocedrus Decurrens 33333B3:d 0 OR EMI 2:S:e I F • + 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 200 62 6 28 Eck EAC FSP FOR Crocosmia Lucifer Erica Cornea 'Krammere Red' Euonymus Nola 'Compacto' Fagus Sylvatico 'Purpureo' Fraxinus Oxycarpo 'Raywood' 84 Gaultheria shollon 127 Ilex Crenata Convexo 30 Junlperus h. Blue Rug 316 Junlperus 'Old Gold' 16 Leucothoe minor's 5 Lonicero Silver Beauty 10 Mohonia Repons 7 Phoriumtenax 'Bronze' Pierus Mountain Fire Pinus Nigro Austrian Pine Spiroea Bulmado Anthony Waterer TJ Thuja Pyromldalis 6 -7' GT5 Gleditsio Trlancanthos 'Shademaster: Honey Locuts 2 1/2" C. PLO Prunus Laurocerasus 'Otto Luyken' Otto Luyken Laurell5 -18" B &B l8 4 10 68 71 135 Gs ICC JOG La COMMON NAME SIZE /NOTES TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (sot) 5n -x000 Incense Cedar 12' Full to ground, dug twice during digging season and heeled 1 gal 1 gal. 18" 0.C. trt. sp. Burning Bush 18 -24" B &B Purple Beech 3.5" cola Roywood Ash 2.5" cal. full rounded limbs beginning at 6* 1 gal. 18" tri. sp. Japenese Holly 15 -18" B &B 1 got. 18" trl. sp. Juniper 15 -18 B &B 1 gal, 1 gal. 1 gel. 50 gal. BUILDING 981 LANDSCAPE PLAN 18 -21 ", 1 gal. 18 -20' full, bushy specimens 57 RhodoGW Rhododendron 'Comer. Waterer 17 Rhododendron Anoh Kruschke 11 Rhododendron Elizabeth Hydroseeded Gross -72 Viburnum Dovidil Arctostaphylos Uva Ursi 54 18 -21" B/B 30 -36" 15 -18" 1 Lbs /100 sf 12x12 "B&B Kinninnlck 1 gallon con 0 24" DI, sp. S.Iver Beauty 60 Ilex Crenolo Convex° 3 Pinus Nigro WPM= to .KL CRAM en, PROJECT MAItcm 18.44.130 River Environment Plonlin, KONG COUNTY ± 1824 Id.\ 30 = 60 trees mininum 30' EASEMENT required. LIMITS Trees prodded = 60 LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60' 20 Prunus Laurocerosu oaduAen ENLARGED PLAN @ ENTRY SCALE: 1s =15' VARIES 'A'` 4/26/99 MARINO NUM!: Anjou, ico L-1.0 mu my ig ton 6A L 51a-t 1°1 MECTr OP. •0 bon ule••I• ^2 re,14., ?. f r Ll EI r. "' U1 ��... �.., 5....'1.�':'L L i 0 . It1111111IIIIIININH11111111IIIIII4II IIIR111111111U1HUI NIMIIII IUDIHNIIIINNINIIIIIII11111111111110i11 ,1 hRl1 PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION ♦ i • t • _ _. s . , fi /1 'IS'.+;. f' F v iy " :r •..f 4 .., 4 k `• :, �% • � rL . 4 1 Gr , • �S :, . • ...47 t j.:K� x(il 1 I {( 1 .c'It 1 fit; ( ∎ilk, i! ppa,;;/ty; ».jtao a w `r^ - `:`YH7`• '.«ry N. -. •.04vQ T:r; 4 .J L •�. Tdtr1'73 1, r i� •�'' it, `� rSµ ^f .�I_u. �' �'%' '.`.. a .N4r Vl,v...j ;k•H.e.w:>,i�l' �t J.K -ywary tY- • �, ' 7 •9. i tv. .y.}k.'! .1 S u ,a. �� t "r ; � � ?l� •.9i7yy'�7 { ,s .4: j �,� S� r :.7 1 ,;�N1e,k.y .h. }- ,.�,i. :,r .14y ; +,;.`. t:i?;•:.� F� }'h' f'• .`'c:": .:7.'$v..±. •Oi >,3.. t S1• ^l.a {.3r'f� •,i 3' wtA ; i'; ;s„ . ri. � :. t � 3 3.: ;.r � �..? �� k`i ;i:.Jir 15t; 4 fr �; i., ��'?:'tkNxF� iii."a:'x [i l" .....Z i "�, iif��}4`s \��f.1 y`'1:4:; �'�i;r.; `;=.! ' I ' t (' • { A iY *t I S! , t � y' r ��7 �.,, 3 w } 5 rn i t ( , �x�. ;a.w:..,.... � „�:};�:>n�k;,rfcti' „t �.. .i ""t ;. t. .,�. - 5 't,'' � > } ! � ? :t Y a •�, °.. t. ,t �..: ,. .. �) .. 'r.� :: •'� t. w,�rt � '�jyi;�. :1 r•: r` .' � .. "I . ... � r >: t /J f ' i * 'v L''•� 1 �,, '.� E a• i � ::K � \... , (; i. a�. d .-+.� , ^ /4, { {% i 107 I . ::�'�» PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION v.I ni1iiuli n11iollinhil ilhilii0miGiiiliiidiiiiiiiiiliiiiliiiilii idniiiiiiliniliiiiiuidiinbn1l11nhiiiliillpuili ,;mLO APPES kriA BAR •spa'( 0 U) z 0 I- Q oaw rn-i w 0 zQ 0- 5Q CO CL 206 325_2553 sheet BLDG. 763 BLDG. 752 REVISIONS: BLDG. 734 SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Doe) 575 -x000 BUILDING 981 PROPERTY LINE CURB LINE TOP OF BANK LIMITS OF 30' MAINTENANCE EASEMENT DESIGNED BY PROJECT NUMBER: aN 99- 981 -01 DRANK DT: DRAWN BY PA CHEERED 90 ISSUE DATE: SN SCALE: DATE: 1" = 60' 5/18/99 DRAINNO NUMBER: • , TOP OF LEVEE 0In.. lu. 1 • . ,. I11 .sl, tIi— CI-'Lr ,.0 -,Ut : B . L.y- S- ' -,1`. .0 -1. E 0: ? Ipnhiuliutlunlinilnulini6ullmiyulllilOmllimluulwlluululdmiul uluullntlmilliulinilnuhmlinihminnlilul ,', SHEEN 1 1 Fl\ WWW MWW M W W IS W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W M W M, W W W W M./ WI W W W YI W W Yt 4; OM 1111 415 W W W W W W W W W W W M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WMW ▪ Y M W W 744 W W W. W W W W W GM WI W W M M W W W M W 011 W W W W W W W W W W W W WM W W 154 W 547 M W WMW W W M M W WMW WIW MWMMW W W W W W W WM M M M M WI M M W WW WMM■WM M a. W W5w W WM W WM M M M W W WI W W W W W W M 4* M WMMM WW M W W W W W W W M W W W W M414 W W W W W WMW W W W W W WM WWWW of W W W W W WWW W M WWW WWW WWW W WWW WMW W WM WW WWW W W WIMW WIMMW WYM WMM■M W W WI/. W MIW W W WMW WMW W MMM W U1 tl1 YW W M MM WMMM W W W WWWWW WWWWW WMW W W W In MMW W WIW W ■MW W M M M W W M W W W M W VI M■ W W W M W W W W M M M W W W Iw 4 W M M M M M M 111 M M M M W W M M M M M M W W M W W W W WI W W W W W W M M M W M W W M M W M W W W W M M W W M W WMW S M W W W W W W W W1 W W W W SN W W W W W M S W M W M W W UW W W W W M M M W W W W W M W M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ./ WWW W W W j W W W 1 W W W �4 W .t W ���. W W W _a_ W W W W WWI r■rutmL,>16Pw.....1 W. use V. It •u.W i�:l•_il1ntw'o_ W.w Er...71—W • j1Q.w.iLWTM■Wo i • WM. WOW W.W. .4 ..w,..WW. LRAM. •H W NM WM. UMW .. • TIM • wW .,a w1 T • a .ww,rW.Ww...1. to 1Ut W... UMW .w .x • M. • WW1. WW1. WlwW Wexs HON WHOP . 1 W. WM . NM MN 1 al DE ma um I ED ED swi an / Da:! a.mi 211 III M I SIN MD I ma re II HE o w No I •I 4. I Mg Mg I MI WN. ED HO ..1.: W re! so NW I ".,0! Q{Q arWM1 '! !!A! ! OM NW W. WA -I 1 .ii ED UM I MN IMi l W WWW .. ! M r— MW W W W W W Mi M M M YI M W W W W W W W W W 04 W W M M W W W W W W W M W I4( WWWWM WWWWWWW■■ MWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW■ 041 ■ MANIA W W W W W W .1 W W W W W W W W W W W W W■ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W •u H ^ Im I r.. �', r�• ' 1. It I ..17W:71',"--.U1 .77 E T,,L L { o; '. I IIIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIpIIIqu6ud, IFTVE REVISIONS: SEGALE BUSINESS PARK 'WNW ILA, WASHINGTON (206) 575 -2000 TITLE: BUILDING 981 NIGHT TIME ILLUMINATION PLAN DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: HOWARD LIGHTING 99- 981 -01 DRAWN BY: DRAWN BY: PDA ZiI : Sr S ISP - SN SCALE: DATE: 1' = 40' 2/1/99 BUILDING 981 IIIIIf'II / / / EXIST 1 GRADE SIGHT LINE EXIST LEVEE GREEN RIVER 2694' 184' SIGHT LINE HVAC UNIT NEW F.G. SECTION D SCALE: 1" = 50' - 120', SIGHT LINE i� NEW F.G. SECTION E SCALE: 1" = 50' NOTES: 1) EYE LEVEL ASSUMED TO BE 5 -2". 2) TREE HEIGHT ASSUMED TO BE 30'. EXIST LEVEE GREEN RIVER SIGHT LINE NEW F.G. 1486' BUILDING 981 SECTION A -A SCALE: 1" = 50' NEW TREES HVAC UNIT EVE 'LEVEL TYP. NEW . F.G. 1 HVAC UNIT. EXIST. GRADE 361' NEW TREES SECTION B -B SCALE: 1" = 50' EXIST LEVEE NEW F.G. SIGHT LINE EXIST LEVEE HVAC UNIT SECTION C -C SCALE: 1" = 50' GREEN RIVER 1_ NEW EXIST F.G. LEVEE 572' BUILDING 981 111' SIGHT LINE NEW 1 F.G. BUILDING 981 NEW F.G. EXIST. GRADE 1DIMENSION CHANGE 4/20/99 I SEGALE BUSINESS PARK I I i I TUKWILA, WASHINGTON cxoe) 575 -2000 BUILDING 981 SECTIONS AT MECHANICAL UNITS RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 2 1 1999 PERMIT CENTER 0nw"co m 0RNwN O PDA =MD BY SN sous PRO*R NWKR: 99- 981 -01 Co r 1ELEV RSut DR AS SHOWN wTC 2/3/99 0 AWM0 1111N0LR: SNEETt 1 at 1 J„i :OSnn .via I I 2 .713 • J 4, LI EI . I UI • . D 1 7.7C77:17.7 1101111111IIIgI1pIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRQIII 1(1 111lp1111111111111K111p1111111111111liplpp IIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMI JOKLIl • It 18" TO 36" POPLAR TREES TO BE REMOVED 2— H.C. & 1 VAN STALL PER CODE 20— 9'x20' STALLS 10'x16'x6' CHAIN LINK ENCLOSED DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE AREA 23— 9.3'x20' STALLS 12— 9.3'x20' STALLS 11'x32'x8.5' CONCRETE ENCLOSED DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE AREA GRAPHIC SCALE 50 75 10 .. 150 18— 9.3'x20' STALLS ( a7 PEET) 1 Inch - 60 (L 6 8.5'x20' STALLS 7— 8.5'x20' STALLS 11'x20'x8.5' CONCRETE ENCLOSED DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE AREA 9— 9'x20' STALLS I / FACE OF CURB GREEN RIVER SCOPE OF WORK CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING SHELL AND SITE WORK TENANT IMPROVEMENT WORK INCLUDING MEZZANINE IS BY SEPARATE PERMIT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL BY SEPARATE PERMIT NOTES: 1. USEZONE IS HI 2. BUILDING CODE IS 1997 UBC AND STATE AND CITY OF TUKWILA ORDINANCES. a. OCCUPANCY GROUP IS S -1 WITH ACCESSORY USE B & S -3 b. CONSTRUCTION TYPE IS III —N, SPRINKLERED, II MAINTENANCE ` ` I I ROAD ` \ 28— 9'x20' STALLS _ // / PARKING CALCULATIONS: GROSS SO. FT. = 312204 NET WAREHOUSE = 303206 NET OFFICE = 20984 ELECTRIC ROOM = 550 WAREHOUSE PARKING 1/2000 SO. FT, OFFICE PARKING 3/1000 SO. FT. WAREHOUSE = 152 STALLS OFFICE = 63 STALLS TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED = 215 TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED = 215 LIMITS OF 30' LEVEE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR EASEMENT SEGALE BUSINESS PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (N4) e78-7005 BUILDING 981 MISC. DETAILS 12— 9'x20' STALLS TRASH /RECYCLE CALCULATIONS: 312204 x 3 = 937 SQ. FT. REQUIRED 1000 SPACE PROVIDED: 1 0 10'x16' = 160 SQ. FT. 1 0 11'x32' = 352 SO. FT. 2 0 11'x20' = 440 SQ. FT. TOTAL = 952 SQ. FT. RIVERWARD TOP OF LEVEE. 11'x20'x8.5' CONCRETE S ENCLOSED DUMPSTER/ RECYCLE AREA 5— 9'x20' STALLS DRAM It PDA CVO W SC t axax0 IS 0C mob WAM MM 1" = 50' 4/22/99 MEAN HIGH WATER MARK r s1`.'Gi— Ci— Li -:.i: ;.,�� ` ^';�,:. D.. ? t- _'i...' .7:'—;'L.. L . I 01 • � I1luhiiJmdnn�nnlin��nnluu�un! on�uiliiul�lntluu�nulnu�unlnn�lulipil�uulwl�nnluu�unlun�oullul�gl�l�n�l W or ,1' 40' E -141. W - KED s w 0!' 10' E 401 W - KED 0 I I!• w' IY t -1914 90' - DEED 247. 29 sz. -._- 100TH ,, ESL_ N 87. 50' 09' W 947. ISW 1/4, NE 1/4 35 -23 -4 \ CO I EXCEPTION l (s Dr tO DO• I N 13' 37'53' E N 59• 25' 57' E 70. 41/ m 73. 85 ;,4 es• tfr Oor v-pow 88'7g02' 27' E 103, 7 O • / N 87' 50, (N or 43' Ir c- mot N 09' 47' 17' E 28, 33 EXC N. E. CDR. SW 1/4, NE 1/4 35 -23 -4 09' W . 15 422, 73 SEGALE DRIVE 'D' 7' 50' 09�,�- -- i / I I / I I i I 1 1 I I lU I ce GOVVEIY*ENT LOT 6 113. P. S. E. ESMT *9105060703 40. N62. 54' 45' V 52. 09 (II ST sr 1r r - ssn N 87. 57' 03' V 54 S. V C012. G. L 6 A3 N IA �� a to i KN RIVER PROTECTION EASEMENTS'/ NO' S. 5222051, 6027013, 6027015 9110310987, 6014672 04 K. C. RES, 031833 / I ! I I / i I / / CADFILE NAMED LLASDP, DWG ■ PAINT, 6 EASEMENT CURVE DATA m R - 420.00 A - 04. 2e' 23' L or 32, 79 ®R -420. 00 A-15' 13' 11' L- 111.91 ©R • 1600.00 A - 10. 03' 54' L - 291.06 c R • 215.00 A mi 29' 11' 5S' L • 109.57 Q R - 242. 00 O • 37' 06' 44' L ■ 156.75 A - 33. 45' 42' L ■ 133.76 %R-227.00 R- 360.00 A -07. 51' 39' L -49.39 a R ■ 607.50 L1 • 34• 11' 03' L - 362.45 eR -50.00 A -91' or SO' L -79.99 R -30.00 A -e4' 24' 55' L -73.67 R -50.00 A■95' 35' OS' L ■e3.41 R II 2530. 00 A - Or 25' 47' L - 372. 23 R • 2530. 00 A • O!' 33' 00' L • 112. GO R - 1470. 00 A • O3' 24' !e' L • 146.91 R - 477, 47 A - 13. 00' 00' L • 109.33 R - 2470. 00 A • or 57' 44' L - 429.47 R • 1000. 00 A • O6. 47' 12' L - 118. 45 R- 460.00 A -25' 46' 5Y L- 207.00 R - 960. 00 A - 27 39' 57' L - 231. 31 DECLARATION!, KNOW ALL IEN DT VCR PITS THAT ME, THE UNIERSIOCE4 OWNER IN roc six IF THE LAND MEIN BESCRIUD 110 NOM MX A =MARY LINE AD.UMTIOIT. TIE UIDERSIDED FURTHER DECLARE THIS A RMY LINE ADJUSTMENT TO X Tit ORAPMIC nom CONSENTAT N IN IAOCOMPSICE WIN Tit JUNE OP THE OMtl. INK YIT)I 712 IN YITNI= MRS WE NAVE SET OUR NAND ID ID A SCMi. P PeffP LI , jj INe , AAWIDIONICOMONIITIM, ITS NAlti . N. A. SEGALE, IDENT STATE OF WA24INGTD1 COUNTY OF KING TO ME I I . TO X ITME INDIYIDIMLD Ib IN /Sm M �>I�UTO WITHIN AND FDDEGOING INSTRUMENT, NO IlC1001.0E TINT NE SEINED MC AS MIS ME NO VOLUNTARY ACT NO DEED, FOR TIC IEES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. GIVEN UNDER NY AID AND OFFICIAL SE11L THIS ' ,i5'• • DAY or -/- '('": 1919. VIONATURE OF f;:Y•ARY KWIC VT OMISSION MIRED IRIErnr ' // -'-"- i ,C,g4-/- -____. .0461.'^^" 6',,.} aIlt if S • r,.. . >'tat. t ',.•• , ... ;� • I. APPROVALS! DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVED This 1 -(11` DAY OF -J X1141 E_. 1199, DIRECTOR�•rF' t. sue-✓ \ KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS /r aY DAY or J ✓r• y 1191. DAMNED AND APPROVED TNIs Z-C e z- /Yo Ede- REPAIR KIND COUNTY ASS *9404060591 .2r623''- y, id• - 5 , 34 - 9 e,rs' ;.., [.,.,ehs iE}UTY K1110 MINTY AS -SIX - ,Jo - 9/ /,t• viii'- yi.G• 91/f- 5Y/9 -9P." - f/o2/ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONP '' S`�F""`� �r.?3- o y This map correctly represents a survey wade by we or under my direct Ion In accordance with the row I rements of the Survey **Cording Act, at the request of 41 � /d4/ t A972,0:6)0? '/ th I s 9f-'1, day of ✓4-1. E , 19 -� 11ICNAEL G. MIX C S. 'Cert. No. 15033 RECORDING CERTIFICATED REC. NO. Filed for record this day of , 19_, at Volume, of surveys, page , at the request of Michael G. Mix. MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. TUKWILA, WA. 206- 575 -2000 • IMO 1 = 200' lam VA MGM Dom 1 /7/99 "T`° CITY TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L "�vI 6/8/99 Q q ° °° 8 eae u1t SEGALE BUSINESS PARK 201sBP -1/99 LOT LINE A'JUSTMENT L Si rl Et %C l • •. LINEMLINNICINPIINIR PANEL PORTlCW OF TIE SOIJMWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND 490YERMEM' LOT 2 DI SECTION 35, TOMMIE 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., 114 KING COUNTYp WASHINGTON„ DISC TREED AS FOLLOWS: COMMINa*3 AT TIE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE 110t IWAIT QUTARIER OF SAID SEMEN 35; THENCE SOU7N 87' 50' 09" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LEE THEREOF, 44030 F8d1;/WINCE SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET TO THE ROUTH MARLiI! OF aOUTH no" STREET; TWICE SOUTH Sr 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN, 947AS PIET TO THE !RUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EWEIS713RLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH S2. w Sr WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET 11R000H A CENTRAL ANGLE OF Ito° 24' Sr, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7347 PEET; THENCE SOUTH or 44' 56" WEST , SILOS FEET, TIERCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF or 25' 47", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 372.23 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION ;11ENCE NORTH $7. 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LEN! OF SAID SU CIVIS3ON, 6191 FEET; TWINGE NORTHERLY ALONO A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 73° 2S' 16" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 8,4710 PEET 11EOU GH A CFNIRAL ANGLE OF 03° 24' 28", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 146.91 worn THENCE NORTH 69. 15' or WEST, 5531 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 55' 15" WEST, 52.99 PEET; THENCE NORMS? 15' 04" WEST, 1117.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07' 44' 56" WEST, 4823 MET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 477.47 FEET iIHRGU OH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 00' 00", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 108.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST, 91036 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66' 31' 28", WEST 671.93 FEET TO THE MOST SOUITEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT I OF TIE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85- 19-SS„ RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619; THENCE NORTH VP l3" EAST ALONG TIE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 1424.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87° 50' or WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 210.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1r 28' 17" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 27.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20° 59' 11" WEST, 58.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13° 37' 53" EAST, 70.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' SP" EAST, 34173 FEET; THENCE 30(717102 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' SP EAST, 502.76 nun THENCE NORTH or 44' 56" EAST, 348.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF or 35' 05", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 180Th STREET; THENCE SOU 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 160.76 FEET TOTIE 7RUS TWIT OFBICO VNIING. UNIAL BPPC IPITON: PARCEL B - THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ;LAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE SOUTH 87° 56' 03" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5 1141.94 PUT TO A POINT OF CURVATURE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE GOING IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER OF WHICH (EARS NORTH 73° 28' 16" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 57' 44" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 429.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST 85.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20° 44' 56" EAST 12.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST 511.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 31' 28" EAST 253.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 14' 18" WEST 75.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 31' 39" EAST 262.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED L» €R AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES, NORTH 13° 55' 00" EAST 84.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22° 32' 00" EAST 115.31 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 560.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23° 39' 57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 231.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46° 12' 00" EAST 200.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 460.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25° 46' 59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 207.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06° 47' 12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.45 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY NORTH 66° 54' 13" WEST 33839 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE GOING IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2530.00 PEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02° 33' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST 61.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. II.ZGAL DRECRIPTION: PARCEL C - THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 400.66 FEET TO A POINT ON TIE EASTERLY MARGIN OF ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 25° 01' 18" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 438.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 25° 01' 18" WEST ALONG SAID EAs."C:r!.v MARGIN, 439.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 36' 37" EAST 486.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23° 28' 33 c. +ST,431.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66° 29' 11" WEST 152.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62° 54' 45" WEST 52.09 FEET; THENCE N 65° 47' 42" WEST 269.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. maces, D- THAT PORTION OF OOVER/ROW LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNYN 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 CAST, W.M., IN KING CORM, WASHER: TON, DEBCRISIED AS FCILOWS: OOMMElCa140 AT A POINT, NICE WAS ORIGINALLY MARKED SV AN ECM PIPE, ON SOUTHEASTERLY MAROON OF 11E MINA MESS COUNTY ItAAD (57" AVENUE SOUTH) PROM WHICH row T1E sO TINIEST CORDER OF TEE MID GOVERN TT LOT 6 OOUTH 02° 02' 5r WEST, 313.17 PEET AND NORTH S7' 57' 03" WEST, 506.54 PUT, DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT mow ANGLES 10 AND ALONG SOUTH BOUNDARY LD4E OF MID GOVERNMENT LOT; mewl NORTH 66' 32' 13" 9QIST• 1.64 FEET TO THE 80UfEASTBR Y MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY RAID AS IT EXIST* Ate THE roar oF LiGUWlv14; mum NORTH 25.01' lr BART ALONG MID IEQAD MAIW* 215.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4° 36' 37" EAST, 45631 POT; THENCE SOUTH 23° 2$' sr WEST, 97.92 PEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF- WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31533 AS RECORDED UNTIL& AUDI'TOR'S FILE N08. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID EASEMBI! LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE UM, HAYING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET, TIE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS 9011111 10° 47' Si" EAST 1H ROUXIN A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04° 21' 23" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 32.79 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74° 4I' 28" WEST, 157.00 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NOON 66° 32' 13" WEST; THENCE NORTH 66. 32' 13" WEST, 341.96 FEET TO THE POINT (1 BEGINNING. LEGAL II'17ON: PARCEL E - THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER WHICH ADJOINS AND LIES BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619, AND LIES NORTHERLY OF SAID RIVER; TOGETHER Ii77W THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., WHICH ADJOINS, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH 180Th STREET, WESTERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER AND EASTERLY OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93- 0085, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.9311301961; AND 7VGE77 ER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER IN GOVERNMENT LOT 5 LYING WESTERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER AND LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE ESTABLISHED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833, AND A.F. NO. 6014672, & 6027015. AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. ! DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5, 561.41 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 28" WEST 533.21 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91° 32' 50" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET TO A POINT ON ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 25° 01' 18" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF THE ROAD 113.36 FEET; THENCE SOU 65° 47' 42" EAST 269.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 54' 45" EAST 52.09 FEET; THENCE SOU 66° 29' 11" EAST 152.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23° 28' 33" WEST 529.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 10° 47' 54" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 15' II" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1 11.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10° 03' 54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 281.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69° 04' 40" EAST 113.72 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 215.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29° 11' sr AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42° 25' 42" EAST 387.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 242.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37° 06' 44" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 156.75 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 227.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33° 45' 42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 133.76 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 360.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07° 51' 39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 49.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 607.50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34° 11' 03" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 362.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 01' 12" EAST 108.87 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE NORTH 66° 31' 39" WEST 262.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29° 14' 18" EAST 75.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 28" WEST 887.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; RECORDING CERTIFICATE! LEGAL DMCRQBON: PARCEL F- THAT PORTION OF TIE SOUTHEAST 54 OF THE NORTHWEST $4, AND THAT PORTION CF 11E SOUTHWEST 54 OF TIE NORTHEAST 54 OF NEC TION 35, 'IOWIw. 23 NORTH, RAM 4 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF SOIAIICBNIBR PARKWAY (S7i MINIM SCUM AND LOT 2 OF THE COY OF TUCWITA SHORT PLAT NO. 13 -1951, RIOOMM UNDER KRIS COUNTY RECORDING NO 8511589111119, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESC7M AS FOLLOWS: CCIM ENCTNO AT 711E NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 SAID POINT ALSO 1 IO THE POINT OF litalt IM;, 71ENCB SOUTH 17' 28' IT WEST, 47632 PEST, MINCE NORTH Mil' 28" WEST, 256.19 PEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO 711E RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 511 FEET, THROUGH A CENITIAL AN= OF 91° 32' 41" AN ARC DSSTANOI CF *89 PINT TO TIE SOUTHEASIIIILY MARGIN OF ANNA •3S COUNTY ROAD (ea AVIINUS SOUTH); 71ENCE NORTH 25° 01' IS" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD /AARON 357.97 LMT; HENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN NORTH 19° 03' IT BAIT, 854.97 Peer TIENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN NORTH 09' 45' 44" EAST, 213:3 FE T; THENCE LEAVING SAID ROAD MARGIN NORTH 59° 25' 2T' EAST, 7345 PEET; TIENCE NORTH Sr or 30" EAST, 103.77 PEET; THENCE SOUTH 1T 50' O9" EMT,12.l5 PMT; THENCE SOUTH 13° 37' 53" WEST, 70.41 POT; THENCE SOUTH 20° Sr I r EAST. 5E03 Peer 1O A POINT ON TIE WEST LIE OF LOT I OF TIE CTTY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. S5.19IS RBC0110111) UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 1505090619; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST use CIF TAT 1 SOUTH 17° 28' 17" WEST, 3456 PEET; THENCE COMDIUDIO ALONG SAID WWI' LDE OF LOT 1 NOITR W 47' SW WEST, 35.02 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE Cow I sown 17°2r IT WEST, 474.OSPBETTOTIE PCIIRVTQRJIGD I1 . L>CIFT1MAT POTION, ■ ANY, INCLUDED WTTIIN 1HE FOLLOWING DElQIeeO TRACT: 11110111111110 AT TIE 110111ff1NEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 14 OF TIE NORTHEAST 14 OF MO SECTION 35; HIES ALONG THE NORTH LIE THEREOF SOUTH W 54' 46 • BAIT 247.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05.51' 40" EAST 14236 PMT 1 THENCE SOUTH 54' ST 45" MT 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 15930 FEET; sums SOUTH Sr SS' S5" WIST 103.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ST 20' 5F' WEST 100:30 FEET TO A POET ON 11E CTRNIER OF THE ROAOT ENCB POLLOWEIG ma CENTER LIE OF SAID ROAD NORTH 0• 43' ar EAST 467.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE 80UIIEAS'I' 16 CF THE NORTHWEST 14 OF SAID SECI70N FROM WHICH TIE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF SEARS SOUTH Sr 53' 32 " EAST 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH Sr 53' 32" EAST 101.47 PEET TO THE TRUE PCU4T OF BEGINNING; AND 61'CEPT THAT PORTION DESC REED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT TIE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID M IVINON; THENCE NORTH SI• 53' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 101.47 PMT; TWICE gamier 43' lr WRIT 477.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17' 59' 30" WEST 247.69 PEET TO THE 7RU T POSIT CIF BEGINNING; THENCE COW11P& 1NO SOUTH 17' 59' 34" WEST 151.10 MT, HENCE SOUTH 71° 43' 40" EAST 203.51 FEEL; THENCE NORTH 16.21' 50" BAST ISLES FEET, MI NIX NORTH 71° 43' 40" WEST 199.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF ENO; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION, IF' ANY, INCLUDED OMEN Lamy OF THE MY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 115-13-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 138319S619; SITUATE IN THE COY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. NTTON. CAW'ILE NAM LLASIP. DVG REC. NG. Fl led for record this day of , 19_, at , m. Volume of surveys, pap, , at the request of M l chat l G. M I x. MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION' This nap correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in accordance with the requirements of the Survey Record) Act, at the request of /4 l'94/4/77i1 .0179 th Is 9 day of NA/ , 19 Cert. No. 15033 LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. TUKWILA, WA. 206 -575 -2000 %Az N/A swim sh MGM 11N1I 1/7/99 0101 6/8/99 '1 CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 'tilaGALE BUSINESS PARK SBP -1/99 NEW LOT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Liewliwil Mann TOTAL PARCEL - THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID SUBDIVISION DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6486096 DATED APRIL 11, 1968; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER LYING EASTERLY OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD; ALL IN SECTION 3S, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., EkCEPTCOUN IY ROAD; AND EXCEPTTHAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 111° 34' 46" EAST 247.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05.5 1' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54.52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8691' 00" WEST 103.76 FEET THENCE SOUTH SM 20' 50" WEST 100.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER OF THE ROAD; THENCE FOUAWING THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTH 08.43' 18" FAST 467.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 88° 53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 118.53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION DISTANT SOUTH 88° S4' 46" EAST 449.30 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH U° 54' 46" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 202.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05°5 1' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54.52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET THENCE SOUTH UP 54' 46" EAST 424.89 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 01.05' 14" EAST; THENCE NORTH 01.05' 14" EAST 401.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE COUNTY ROAD: AND EXCEPT A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 81° 53' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O8. 43' 18" WEST 477.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 247.69 FED TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; !HENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 1r 59' 30" WEST 151.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71.43' 40" EAST 203.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 21' 50" EAST 151.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71° 43' 40" WEST 199.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE COUNTY ROAD. AND TOGETHER 07171 ALL OF GOVERNMENT LOT FIVE (5), AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT SIX (6) LYING EASTERLY OF THE EXISTING COUNTY ROAD WHICH EXTENDS IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION OVER AND ACROSS SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6, ALL IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6, LYING EASTERLY OF SAID ROAD AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE, AND FROM WHICH POINT THE SOUTHWEST CORNEA OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 BEARS SOUTH or Sr 10" WEST 313.17 FEET, AND NORTH 89° 01' SO" WEST 505.54 FEET, SAID DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 67° 36" 00" EAST 380.45 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH or 36' 00" EAST 50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE BANK OF TIE GREEN RIVER. AND TOGETHER WITH: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT WT 2, IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF THE GREEN RIVER. EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID GOVERNMENT TAT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6486096, DATED APRIL 11, 1968. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T. L. 119 (TAT 2, TUKWILA S.P.11645S8, REV. ILA 934N8S) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 3S, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE SOUTH Er 50' 09" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 449.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH or 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 180111 STREET; THENCE SOUTH sr 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 947.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02. 09' SI" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET 11*000H A CENTRAL ANGLE OF H• 24' SS", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH Or 44' 56" WEST , 878.08 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET 'THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF or 27' 01 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 373.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH sr 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 61.91 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 73• 27'; 01" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2, 470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03° 24' 21", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 146.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST, 55.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30' 55' IS" WEST, 52.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 112• 15' 04" WEST, 117.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST, 48.23 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 477.47 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13. 00' 00 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 108.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20. 44' 56" WEST, 74.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE IVORIES'?" 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 742.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17 28' 13" EAST, 856.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17' 50' 09" WEST, 210.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 2$' 17" WEST, 393.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70. 47' 48" WEST,.23.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH or 24' 12" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 467.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH sr 02' 37" EAST, 26.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 50' Or EAST, 424.119 FEET; 'HENCE SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17' 50' 09" EAST, 80176 FEET; THENCE NORTH 07° 44' 56" EAST, 341.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95. 35' 05 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH mom STREET; THENCE SOUTH it 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 160.76 FEET TO THE 77tUE POINT OFBEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT II - THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER WHICH ADJOINS AND LIES BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSIONS OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY AND EASTERLY LINES OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505000619, AND LIES NORTHERLY OF SAID RIVER; 7CJGE7HIER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 AND OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER, WHICH ADJOINS, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH I10Th STREET, WESTERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER AND EASTERLY OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-0085, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.9311301961; TOGETHER I1777I THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6, WHICH LIES EASTERLY OF AND ADJOINS LOT 1 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 1505000619; AND WGE1HER I1777I THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT S AND OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER ADJOINING WHICH LIES SOUTHERLY OF SAID LOT 4 OF THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, EASTERLY OF LOT 1 OF SAID SHORT PLAT AND NORTHERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER; ALL IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A MONUMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST' 'A OF THE NORTHEAST 'A OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST 956.67 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2500.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° 22' 20" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 234.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST 55.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 55' IS" WEST 56.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12° 15' 04" WEST 185.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST 51.23 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 447.47 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 00' 00" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 108.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' SC WEST 396.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69° 15' 04" EAST 180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69° 15' 04" EAST 85.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 22' 12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 576.31 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID EXCEPTION; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TIJKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCEW ION: T. L 36 (LOT 3, TUKWILA S.P. $6.19 -SS) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 02. 24' 12" WEST ALONE; THE EAST LINE THEREOF, 560.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 515.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64° 51' 21" WEST, 78210 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAR (37Th AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 25. 01' 32" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN, S 11.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, TTE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUT1164° 38' 28" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91° 32' 59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66. 31' 27' EAST, 533.36 PEET TO TIE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRRTION: T. L 116 (LOT 4, T\TICIVIL.A S.P. $I-19 -SS) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TIE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH) AND FROM WHICH POINT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 BEARS SOUTH 02° 02' 43" WEST, 313.17 FEET AND NORTH ar 57' 17" WEST, 505.54 FEET, SAID DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; THENCE NORTH 66.31' 59" WEST, 1.64 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD AS IT EXISTS, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 25. 01' 32" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 256.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64.51' 28" EAST PERPENDICULAR TO SAID ROAD MARGIN, 712.80 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 17.01 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASTMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TFE FOLLOWING COURSES, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13. 01' 38" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,600.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07° 30' 44 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.7E FEET; THENCE ALONG ANOTHER CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 04'27' 06" WEST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19° 43' 3$" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 144.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74.43' 2r WEST, 1 57.00 FEET TO A POINT PROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING EBARS NORTH 66.31' 59" WEST; THENCE NORTH K• 31' 5!" WEST, 343.91 FEET TO THE POI NIT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRNIION: T. L. 115 (LOT 2, TUKWILA S.P. 85.19 -S0) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT' LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 17' 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 134.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1 r 28' 17" WEST, 476.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66 °31' 2r WEST, 256.19 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, THROUGH 'A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91° 32' 50" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 25.01' I8" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 325.51 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 87° 56' 03" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 266.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 118- THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 4 OF THE NORTHWEST' Vs OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST' 'A OF THE NORTHEAST 'A OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 18° 54' 46 " EAST 247.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05° 51' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54° 52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86° 58' 00" WEST 103.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH Sr 20' S0" WEST 100.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER OF THE ROADMENCE FOLLOWING THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTH 01° 43' II" EAST 467.77 FEET TO A POINT CNN THE NORTH LINE OF TIE SOUTHEAST'4 OF THE NORTHWEST OF SAID SECTION FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 18° 53' 32 " EAST 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPTTHAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88° 53' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01° 43' 1r WEST 477.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° S9' 30" WEST 247.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 151.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71° 43' 40" EAST 203.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 28' 50" EAST 151.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71° 43' 40" WEST 199.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN LOT 1 OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619; SITUATE IN WE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CADFILE NAME' LLASBP. DVG SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATION' This nap correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in accordance with the requlrenents of the Survey Record 1nEI Act, at the request ,�oyfy l/A41./Ad' G /�D /�bJoi:z�l W 44% this /- day of ✓o, 4 , 19 9 ICHAEL G. MIX L, S. Cert, No. 15033 RECORDING CERTIFICATE' REC, NO. Filed for record this day of , 19_, at mT Volume, of surveys, pap, , at the request of Michael G, MIx. MANAGER SUPT, OF RECORDS LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. TUKWILA, WA. 206 -575 -2000 SCALD 1' = 200' NMI m MGM Mme' 1/7/99 '1' 6/5/99 "TL`' CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT Na SSEEGALE BUSINESS PARK EXISTING LOT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS nc l 201SBP -1/99 i•i•i'� ?i'i' 0 Inch. i 16 ,I. i Sl (f'l El Gl 1-1771Trir:7; I. 3 AY 1rr3/V1 f N 59' 25' 73, 85 N 09' 47' 17' E 28. 33 247' 29 2:2-2 m SOUTH _ 180TH STREET .1.42.29 449,30 =� II-- _ __ N :87; 50' 09' W SW 1/4, NE 1/4 947.6 35 -23 -4 ' I EXCEPTION J N 13• 37'53' E 57" E I 70, 4) I NI 88' 02' 27' E 1�b3, / EXC b 4 N 87' 50' 82, 15 PTIUN 409' W 42. 73 SEGALE DRIVE 'D' . 87• N 59' r °�8.0 W, 0 0 T. L. 1220 961 36, 00 ?� - --� °2 = - --J -/ 50'09' W 61 ROAD /UTILITY EASEM 3 I 1 �r / I ti 7. 9 7, CEL A , 838 S. F. A. II // II Ij // I I I/ I / I VE W W, 1j I I 1 II NT n N. E. CUR, SW 1/4, NE 1/4 35 -23 -4 0 In 0 r/ / \108/ 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 15' 04# 1 0T 2 I 07• 4 23 N 69' 55, 31 1'35 --M- 400, 66 GOVERNMENT LOT 6 113.36 ti #7412200 / 87• 6_03' ‘11 / 1141. "79:476 / /r / /47z1‘///1 1r / O / / tiW 11 WATER 69, 70300870, 904 /11207 N 87• 56' 03' 61. 91 1 1 338 $ 9 I 1 8,a 209, 151 S. F. 4. 80 A. P. S. E. ESMT. #9105060703 40. N62• 54' 45' W 52. 09 0/ I II / / 66• 29' 11' W 152. 93 ti v 6• I. P. MON. 4. h ch N 69• 04' 40' W 113. 72 N 29' 14' 18 75. 38 2' 00 34 ' 00' 8 / / / / I I " GOVERNMENT LOT 5 clo N 87' 57' 03' W 50 54 S. W CDR, G. L. 6 0 G R E - N N 14' 01' 12' E 108, 87 7 35o RIVER PROTECTION EASEMENTS'/ NO' S. 5222051, 6027013, 6027015,, 9110310987, 6014672 I. K.C. RES. #31833. I / / / / RECORDING CERTIFICATE; I I i• / I I I l c U -4351 MAINT. & REPAIR EASEMENT #9404060591 CURVE DATA m R = 420, 00 A = 04• 28' 23' L = 32. 79 m R = 420.00 A = 15• 15' 11' L = 111.81 ® R = 1600.00 A = 10' 03' 54' L = 281.06 ® R = 215, 00 0 = 29• 11' 58' L = 109, 57 ® R = 242.00 A = 37' 06' 44' L = 156.75 ® R = 227.00 A = 33• 45' 42' L = 133, 76 Q R = 360. 00 A = 07' 51' 39' L = 49, 39 0 R = 607. 50 A = 34' 11' 03' L = 362. 45 ® R = 50.00 A = 91. 32' 50' L = 79.89 R = 50.00 A = 84• 24' 55' L = 73.67 8 R = 50. 00 A = 95• 35' 05' L = 83. 41 la R = 2530. 00 0 = O8' 25' 47' L = 372. 23 R = 2530.00 0 = 02' 33' 00" L = 112, 60 0 R = 2470. 00 A = 03' 24' 28' L = 146. 91 ® R = 477. 47 A = 13' 00' 00' L = 108. 33 R = 2470.00 A = 09' 57' 44' L = 429.47 8 R = 1000. 00 A = 06' 47' 12' L = 118. 45 R = 460. 00 A = 25• 46' 59' L = 207. 00 4 R = 560. 00 0 = 23' 39' 57' L = 231. 31 CADFILE NAME' LLASBP. DWG SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION' This mop correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in accordance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act, at the request of this day of , 19 MICHAEL G. MIX P. L. S. Cert. No, 15033 A. F. NO. Fl led for record this day of , 19_ , at , m Volume of surveys, page , at the request of Aid-met G. Mix. MANAGER SUPT, OF RECORDS LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. TUKWILA, WA. 206 -575 -2000 SCALE. 1' = 200' DATE. 1/7/99 DRAWN BY, MGM REVISED 2/15/99 TITLE. SEGALE BUSINESS. PARK SHEET. 1 • p'. 3 SUB TITLE. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BRAVING NUMBER. 201SBP -1/99 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A - THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 449.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 1807ti STREET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 947.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84° 24' 55 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST , 878.08 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08° 25' 47 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 372.23 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 61.91 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 73° 28' 16" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03° 24' 28 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 146.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST, 55.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 55' 15" WEST, 52.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82° 15' 04" WEST, 187.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST, 48.23 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 477.47 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 00' 00 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 108.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST, 910.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 28 ", WEST 671.93 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85- 19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619; THENCE NORTH 17° 28' 13" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 1424.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87° 50' 10" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 210.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 28' 17" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 27.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20° 59' , 11" WEST, 58.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13° 37' 53" EAST, 70.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST, 342.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST, 802.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 07° 44' 56" EAST, 348.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95° 35' 05 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 180TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 160.76 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL B - THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE SOUTH 87° 56' 03" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5 1141.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE AND THE TRUE POINT OFBEGINMNG; THENCE GOING IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 73° 28' 16" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 57' 44" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 429.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST 85.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20° 44' 56" EAST 12.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST 180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST 511.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 31' 28" EAST 253.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 14' 18" WEST 75.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 31' 39" EAST 262.75 FEET TO 'A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF- WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES, NORTH 13° 55' 00" EAST 84.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22° 32' 00" EAST 115.31 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 560.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23° 39' 57" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 231.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46° 12' 00" EAST 200.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 460.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25° 46' 59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 207.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06° 47' 12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 118.45 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY NORTH 66° 54' 13" WEST 338.39 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE GOING IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2530.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02° 33' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 112.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST 61.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL C - THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 400.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 25° 01' 18" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 438.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 25° 01' 18" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 439.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 36' 37" EAST 486.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23° 28' 33" EAST,431.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66° 29' 11" WEST 152.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62° 54' 45" WEST 52.09 FEET; THENCE N 65° 47' 42" WEST 269.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NEW PARCEL D- THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH) AND FROM WHICH POINT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 BEARS SOUTH 02° 02' 43" WEST, 313.17 FEET AND NORTH 87° 57' 17" WEST, 505.54 FEET, SAID DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST, 1.64 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD AS IT EXISTS, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 25° 01' 32" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 215.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 36' 23" EAST, 486.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23° 28' 47" WEST, 97.92 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASTMENT AND RIGHT -OF- WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE . THE FOLLOWING COURSES; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 10° 47' 56" EAST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04° 28' 23" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 32.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74° 43' 14" WEST, 157.00 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST, 341.9 FEET-TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (.1101 i 313• OY� 4✓f - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL E - THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER WHICH ADJOINS AND LIES BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85- 19 -SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619, AND LIES NORTHERLY OF SAID RIVER; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER IN GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; WHICH ADJOINS, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH 18077! STREET, WESTERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER AND EASTERLY OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93- 0085, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.9311301961; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER IN GOVERNMENT LOT 5 LYING WESTERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER AND LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE ESTABLISHED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833, AND A.F. NO. 6014672, & 6027015 AND EASTERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93 -0085, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9311301961. AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENC'LOT 5 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. I DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING- AT-THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5, 561.41 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 28" WEST 533.21 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91° 32' 50" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET TO A POINT ON ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 25° 01' 18" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF THE ROAD 113.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65° 47' 42" EAST 269.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 54' 45" EAST 52.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 29' 11" EAST 152.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23° 28' 33" WEST 529.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 10° 47' 54" EA HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 15' 11" AN C DISTANCE OF 111.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIU OF\ 7, 06 1600.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10° 03' 54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF(2 X1.07 ; FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69° 04' 40" EAST 113.72 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO-14-1E RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 215.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29° 11' 58" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42° 25' 42" EAST 387.00 FEET; THENCE ---- - ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 242.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37° 06' 44" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 156.75 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 227.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33° 45' 42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 133.76 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 360.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07° 51' 39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 49.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 607.50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34° 11' 03" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 362.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 01' 12" EAST 108.87. FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE NORTH 66° 31' 39" WEST 262.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29° 14' 18" EAST 75.38 FEET; THENCE N 66° 31' 28" WEST 887.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL F- THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST' /, OF THE NORTHWEST'/,, AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST '/. OF THE NORTHEAST '/, OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); AND LOT 2 OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85- 19 -SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 17° 28' 17" WEST, 476.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66 °31' 28" WEST, 256.19 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91° 32' 50" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (577}1 AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 25° 01' 18" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 357.97 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN NORTH 19° 03' 12" EAST, 854.97 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN NORTH 09° 47' 17" EAST, 28.33 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID ROAD MARGIN NORTH 59° 25' 57' EAST, 73.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 02' 27" EAST, 103.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST, 82.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13° 37' 53" WEST, 70.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 59' 1 I" EAST, 58.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 1 OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85- 19 -SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 1 SOUTH 17° 28' 1 T' WEST, 366.56 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 1 NORTH 70° 47' 56" WEST, 35.02 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 1 SOUTH 17° 28' 17" WEST, 474.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION , IF ANY, INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/. OF THE NORTHEAST 'Vs OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 88° 54' 46 " EAST 247.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05° 51' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54° 52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86° 58' 00" WEST 103.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 20' 50" WEST 100.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER OF THE ROAD;THENCE FOLLOWING THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTH 08° 43' 18" EAST 467.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST % OF THE NORTHWEST'' /. OF SAID SECTION FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 88° 53' 32 " EAST 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPTTHAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88° 53' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08° 43' 18" WEST 477.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 247.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 151.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71° 43' 40" EAST 203.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 28' 50" EAST 151.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71° 43' 40" WEST 199.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION, IF ANY, INCLUDED WITHIN LOT 1 OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85- 19 -SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Y41 I t41�. Cli�v Il'N w CADFILE NAME' LLASBP. DWG SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION' This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in accordance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act, at the request of this day of , 19 MICHAEL G. MIX P. L. S. Cert. No. 15033 RECORDING CERTIFICATE' A. F. NO. Filed for record this day of , 19_ , at m Volume of surveys, page , at the request of Michael G. Mix. MANAGER SUPT, OF RECORDS LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. TUKWILA, WA. 206 - 575 -2000 SCALE. N/A MAUNDY. MGM DATE. 1/7/99 REVISED. 2/15/99 TITLE. SUB TITLE. SEGALE BUSINESS PARK SHEET. 2 DF. 3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NEW LOT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS 201SBP -1/99 BRAVING NUMBER. " 0 Inch 118 1 sit 'L It - 61, •,..1;. JI L.. i �.. F r I, i o iiiiillni�nilluu�ui�lnn�nuhui�nn! iin�i�nlllu��uihln�imluli�iinhnlinuliin�nnlnn�niilnui����lnn�ln�l�ui�i�tilnnl LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTAL PARCEL - THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER LYING EASTERLY OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD; ALL IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 88° 54' 46" EAST 247.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05° 51' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54° 52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 °58' 00" WEST 103.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 20' 50' WEST 100.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER OF THE ROAD; THENCE FOLLOWING THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTH 08° 43' 18" EAST 467.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 88° 53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION DISTANT SOUTH 88° 54' 46" EAST 449.30 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 88° 54' 46" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 202.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05 °51' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54° 52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 54' 46" EAST 424.89 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 01° 05' 14" EAST; THENCE NORTH 01° 05' 14" EAST 401.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE COUNTY ROAD; AND EXCEPT A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88° 53' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08° 43' 18" WEST 477.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 247.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 151.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71° 43' 40" EAST 203.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 28' 50" EAST 151.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71° 43' 40" WEST 199.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE COUNTY ROAD. AND TOGETHER WITH ALL OF GOVERNMENT LOT FIVE (5), AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT SIX (6) LYING EASTERLY OF THE EXISTING COUNTY ROAD WHICH EXTENDS IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION OVER AND ACROSS SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6, ALL IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6, LYING EASTERLY OF SAID ROAD AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD WHICH POINT IS MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE, AND FROM WHICH POINT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 BEARS SOUTH 00° 58" 10" WEST 313.17 FEET, AND NORTH 89° 01' 50" WEST 505.54 FEET, SAID DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 67° 36" 00" EAST 380.45 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 67° 36' 00" EAST 50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE BANK OF THE GREEN RIVER AND TOGETHER WITH: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF THE GREEN RIVER LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T. L. 119 (LOT 2, TUKWILA S.P. 86- 45-SS, REV. LLA 93-0085) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 449.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 180TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 947.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT; THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84° 24' 55 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST , 878.08 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08° 27' 01 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 373.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 61.91 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 73° 27'; 01" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03° 24' 28 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 146.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST, 55.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 55' 15" WEST, 52.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82° 15' 04" WEST, 187.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST, 48.23 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 477.47 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 00' 00 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 108.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST, 74.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 742.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17° 28' 13" EAST, 856.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87° 50' 09" WEST, 210.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 28' 17" WEST, 393.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 47' 48" WEST, 23.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 02° 24' 12" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 467.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 02' 37" EAST, 26.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST, 424.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02° 09' 51" WEST, 36.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST, 802.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 07° 44' 56" EAST, 348.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95° 35' 05 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 180711 STREET; THENCE SOUTH 87° 50' 09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 160.76 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T. L. 115 (LOT 2, TUKWILA S.P. 85- 19-SS) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 87° 56' 03" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 134.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 17° 28' 17" WEST, 476.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66 °31' 28" WEST, 256 :19 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF91° 32' 50" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 25° 01' 18" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 325.51 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 87° 56' 03" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 266.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T. L. 36 (LOT 3, TUKWILA S.P. 85- 19 -SS) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: _ COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF, 560.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 515.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64° 58' 28" WEST, 782.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 25° 01' 32" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN, 511.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 64° 58' 28" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91° 32' 59" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 31' 27' EAST, 533.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T. L. 116 (LOT 4, TUKWILA S.P. 85- 19 -55) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH) AND FROM WHICH POINT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 BEARS SOUTH 02° 02' 43" WEST, 313.17 FEET AND NORTH 87° 57' 17" WEST, 505.54 FEET, SAID DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST, 1.64 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD AS IT EXISTS, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 25° 01' 32" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 256.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64° 58' 28" EAST PERPENDICULAR TO SAID ROAD MARGIN, 782.80 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 02° 24' 12" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 17.01 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASTMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF THE FOLLOWING COURSES, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13° 01' 38" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,600.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07° 30' 44 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.78 FEET; THENCE ALONG ANOTHER CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 04 °27' 06" WEST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19° 43' 38" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 144.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74° 43' 28" WEST, 157.00 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST, 343.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 18 - THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER WHICH ADJOINS AND LIES BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSIONS OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY AND EASTERLY LINES OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-55, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619, AND LIES NORTHERLY OF SAID RIVER; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 AND OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER, WHICH ADJOINS, LYING SOUTHERLY OF SOUTH 180TH STREET, WESTERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER AND EASTERLY OF LOT 4 OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-0085, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9311301961; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6, WHICH LIES EASTERLY OF AND ADJOINS LOT 1 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619., AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 AND OF THE ABANDONED BED OF THE GREEN RIVER ADJOINING WHICH LIES SOUTHERLY OF SAID LOT 4 OF THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, EASTERLY OF LOT 1 OF SAID SHORT PLAT AND NORTHERLY OF THE GREEN RIVER; ALL IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M.; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A MONUMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST' 'A OF THE NORTHEAST' 'A OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST 956.67 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2500.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° 22' 20" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 234.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69° 15' 04" WEST 55.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 55' 15" WEST 56.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82° 15' 04" WEST 185.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07° 44' 56" WEST 51.23 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 447.47 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 00' 00" AND ARC DISTANCE OF 108.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST 396.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69° 15' 04" EAST 180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 44' 56" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69° 15' 04" EAST 85.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2470.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 22' 12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 576.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID EXCEPTION; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 118 - THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST' 'A OF THE NORTHWEST' 'A OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY (57Th AVENUE SOUTH); EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST' 'A OF THE NORTHEAST' 'A OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 88° 54' 46 " EAST 247.29 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05° 51' 40" EAST 142.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54° 52' 45" WEST 203.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29° 26' 45" WEST 159.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86° 58' 00" WEST 103.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 20' 50" WEST 100.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTER OF THE ROAD;THENCE FOLLOWING THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTH 08° 43' 18" EAST 467.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 'A OF THE NORTHWEST' 'A OF SAID SECTION FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 88° 53' 32 " EAST 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 53' 32" EAST 101.47 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88° 53' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 101.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08° 43' 18" WEST 477.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 247.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 17° 59' 30" WEST 151.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71° 43' 40" EAST 203.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 28' 50" EAST 151.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71° 43' 40" WEST 199.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN LOT 1 OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 85-19-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8505090619; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CADFILE NAME! LLASBP. DWG SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION' This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction In accordance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act, at the request of this day of , 19 MICHAEL G. MIX P. L. S. Cert. No. 15033 RECORDING CERTIFICATE! A, F. NO. Filed for record this day of' , 19_ , at m. Volume of' surveys, page at the request of' Michael G. Mix. MANAGER SUPT, OF RECORDS LA PIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC, TUKWILA, WA. 206 - 575 -2000 SCALE. 1# = 200' DATE' 1/7/99 DRAWN BY, MGM REVISED' 2/15/99 T I TIE' SEGALE BUSINESS PARK SHEET. 3 in 3 SUB TITLE, DRAWING NUMBER' LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 201 SBP -1/99 EXISTING LOT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS 0 c i. l l" �i-`€I i L,. I: U I i. r. -` 2 . I ', : Aii` iliiiiiiIIIlii IhiilnihiiliniliuiiiiiiliiiiIIII IIiilnihnhnAi i iIIIiiiii diuii IIIIiiili IIniii IIiiilniiinllii II