Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L99-0009 - SEAFIRST BANK / DESIMONE - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
L99 -0009 SKAGEN MARINE 10625 E. Marginal Way So. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM September 22, 2000 To: Brenda Holt Permit Coordinator Alexa Berlow Associate Planner (206) 431-3673 Fr: RE: Skagen Marine — MI2000-191 PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Landscaping is not required under a demolition permit. Landscaping will be required at the time of development. The applicant may post a bond for irrigation that covers 150% of the value to complete work under the current proposal, or the applicant may amend the demolition permit to include irrigation. A copy of the Developer's Project Warranty Request Form is attached for the applicant's reference should he choose to proceed with a bond for irrigation. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 „.. • STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 September 1, 2000 Seafirst Bank/Desimone Investment Councelors, CSC-47 P.O. Box 34471 Seattle WA 98124 Dear Applicant: ,)nnry •:; _t.'lt.11.■ Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L99-0009 SEAFIRST BANKJDESIMONE - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2000-NW-40024 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to demolish the main Skagen Marine building, a one story building with showroom & shop; replace a main building with asphalt for above ground storage; and demolish a secondary outbuilding, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on August 21, 2000. : I The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21-day appeal period, September 11, 2000. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, ItMfez-c- Marcia Gefdel Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program MG:mg SDP.DOC cc: Alexa Berlow, City of Tukwila Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, L ESL- /�= HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Project Name ,3e -6r,S4 &i.- Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Project Number: L q - alb Hearing Examiner Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Decision Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Aotice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses 7 i sted on this • 1 ' "I d a y o f Orin the year 2060 P:\ wynettaforms \ FORMS \AFFIDAVIT- Mail.doc, 06/29/00 Project Name ,3e -6r,S4 &i.- A- v/31/1'1Y<'-- ,s %cce-H /lcl"..r; -1- Project Number: L q - alb Mailer's Signature: i" P:\ wynettaforms \ FORMS \AFFIDAVIT- Mail.doc, 06/29/00 CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ( ( ( ( OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF N.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 ) K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY iX) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ( ( ( QWEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT. SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT AT &T CABLE SERVICES KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) ( ) POLICE ( ) ( ) PLANNING ( ) ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) ( ) CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE (x) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE SEATTLE TIMES SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 7/14/00 C:WP51DATA \CHKLIST ( DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. P C ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELINE DIV ( DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* i ( OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W /•DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES v (d) ) HEALTH DEPT ( PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES —SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION — SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES OLYMPIC PIPELINE VAL —VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS BRYN MAWR — LAKERIDGE SEWER /WATER DISTRICT CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA —TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS (. ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS # (%G CITY OF SEATTLE — SEPA INFO CENTER — DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES 7ru cart- 01.14zte 1/1-L4 (a-t4, 1) 12...t cam( _ Shore,ine Management Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L99-0009 Status: APPROVED Applied: 02/23/1999 Approved: 06/27/2000 Expiration: 06/27/2002 Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to SEAFIRST BANK/DESIMONE to undertake the following development: SHORELINE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH BUILDING 2 upon the following property: Address: 10625 EAST MARGINAL WY S Parcel No: 042304-9083 Sec/Twn/Rnge: 2/23/4 THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITH1N THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS 'ASSOCIATED WETLANDS. WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE • SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: KING COUNTY SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1 Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the Iattached terms and conditions, , 1 This permit is granted pursuant: to the Shoreline Management Act of :1971 an nothing in •this Permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW), This permit.may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permi ttee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21') DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). • Date: iuL(2&(,2000 Steve Lancast Director, P1 annin16 Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173--14-060. z • Z • 2LLI• n' -1 0 00 10 CO W' UJI -J S u .: w 0 g u_ < w 1-0 Z 1-. • w.uj .2 a 'D • .0 • 0- w ICI 0: 1- I, P. w = f75 47-1 •.0 CITY OF TUKWILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Project Number: P 1?"'G /15' • S ' °51 Permit Number: !vl ,1" 20 °0 -111 Miscellaneous Permit Application Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or facsimile. Project Nanie/Tenantc Value of Construction:. . Site Address :. City State/Zip: 1oblAn 1l2rgineti Waj Tcg a UJt iR Tax Parcel Number: as-f-g �-- (10-33-610 Phone: Da ,) t ''. /' _ ` )00 `7 `1 Property Owner: o H �.J prop or �'e� T'n� . Street Address: _ _City State /Zip: / `� 900. In 4eruihi n AP-e. 66 , bkti,44 wi• Fax 11: (._0(' ) ' iP7't - `i (o(o(o Contractor: P qj8 /$8' re, CA bi o� Bt }) ct-tr) Phone: (,)-(1(;d > -1 u -. Z �-'n V `tom Street Address: -!4 Zsei City State /Zip: ,_;1,-...15 - Marti✓(, Viei Dr. Del) Moinen, Fax II: (24,) 87 8 - D9[v� Phone: L; O&)) L1'33 •.. �Z C Architect: f/ i� ^„ W'4. ti�Jlio ) Street Address: ,,..}. City State/Zip: 1112-D- (-ga t �'Lt%t( -q E �" 4 6�A4%t7 Fax !I: ( ) 2 �f - �J3�� `r Engineer: 1 or Phone: ( ) Street Address: , ., . City State/Zip: Fax i1: ( , Contact Person: t _,I ' n /l•f Phone: (2 Lj ) L' � .)) ._ g (� (j Street Address: oaf..., A tty State/Zip: 1 Z7 z0 - L-�o- alt Dr. J� e�_,Il�it- Fax i1: ("A)) �� ,1 0 _ .93vi �-�f MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUESTED: (TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT) Descriptio of work to be clone (please be specific): Remove.) 3 ext nC 5-}ruc +1 re6 , r-emov C Slabs and -�undaM ) re -tgrar L llv.ect, +0 GCra. t JO etc.) c h.ba5lno) If6-1 -0,c, 1 cu doc&p, 9 an c, ,_ "-een -Cenan c per P lan!) Will there be storage of flammable/combustible hazardous material in the building? ❑ yes no Attach list of materials and stora a location on separate 8 1/2 X 11 aper indicating quantities & Material Safety Data Sheets ❑.Above Ground Tanks / Antennas /Satellite Dishes �Bulkheacl /Docks 71 Commercial Reroof ,�9 Paemolition l2 Fence ❑ Manufactured Housing - Replacement only ❑ Parking Lots ❑ Retaining Walls ❑ Temporary Facilities ❑ Tree Cutting APPLICANT REQUEST FOR MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS ❑ Channelization /Striping ❑ Hood Control Zone Landscape Irrigation Storm Drainage ❑ Water Meter /Exempt # ❑ Water Meter /Permanent 8 ❑ Water Meter Temp # ❑ Miscellaneous ❑ Curb cut/Access /Sidewalk ❑ Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault)!]: Size(s): 4Land Altering: 0 Cut712cubic yards 0 FiII(ZOcubic yards 01311 sq. ft.grading/clearing Sanitary Side Sewer N: CI Sewer Main Extension Private 0 Public ❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 public 0 Deduct 0 Water Only Size(s): Size(s): Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Schedule: dMoving Oversized Load /Hauling MONTHLY SERVICE BILLINGS TO: Name: - Phone:. Address: City /Sta e/Zip: 0 Water 0 Sewer ? Metro 0 Standby P WATER METER DEPOSIT/REFUND BILLING: Name: Address: Phont) Cit)ta e/Zip: Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 1110 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extender) more than once. Date application accepted: 1 a -W-ES°o Date application expires: 2-- i'4-c- Applitio;' taken by: (initials) } Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 To: Department of Ecology Date of Transmittal: August 15, 2000 Date of Receipt: January 28, 1999 Type of Permit: Substantial Development Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Applicant's Representative: Name: Seafirst Bank/Desimone Diane M. Decker Address: Invest Councelors, CSC -47 JSH Properties P.O. Box 34471 6625 S. 190th Street, B 105 Seattle, WA 98124 Kent, WA 98032 Is the applicant the property owner? Yes Location of the property: 10625 East Marginal Way Water Body Name: Duwamish River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Description of Project: A proposal to demolish the main Skagen Marine building, a one (1) story office building with a showroom and shop. The main building will be replaced with asphalt for above ground storage. A secondary out building adjacent to the main building is also proposal to be 'demolished. A third building, located to the south, will remain. The interior of this building will be renovated under a tenant improvement permit. Notice of Application Date: May 12, 1999 Final Decision Date: July 24, 2000 By: Alexa Berlow, Associate Planner City of Tukwila, DCD Phone Number: (206) 431 -3673 • z _ i—. t Z ce 6 -I U 00 N o:. wI. 1, w0 u_< Ci z� z o; uj 0 co 0 w w' Hr- Off";. �:'�r dij'- ":7a.:;:�' :. t to u - 3"W-- r"rn771;-.:,5'rc ., >"rtc ,, tai` : 'a.e -MiFc. ° .+i' 'Yi: "�1_'�'�`r�--'ri.„„:,,,,,,.. =,,,... .,.4 :."'i? c, ?. R7^.." ,,,^R ,,, i73,., u,C:n-•4„.' . . e.w i. r_. w.w ity of Tukwila ,-----%-4 l . �' . s. 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 .. *_: X908 MEMORANDUM TO: hi-a4 (206) 433 -1800 FROM 44/94_, DATE: /?A'u' ee /f ?r/Jzir SUBJECT: Oeltre .: 11 /Y74._ e..; .11 a ti re/ri1 ea-Ael r �2,0,. 1,, / 1ii a&if..,L2, ,f / P6J y, �'.� nit/ C��' Min C - k.Pi�7�ll�f - f �.Re2 2t f r,r d (/t/J i12.7 ,C Q�� ��� �� ��mL.rf �- � - �rra 11- � � /Y&t. i 11.d/ir% d 4 � ti C s .c - ��_ . � t ,-, tc 4A P1/ �l A.c) 71-5 are / ? 1 r 1 - . 1 , City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: 3 ` ' Plan Check/Permit Number: " 000 11 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued Project Name: 61Letlem Ma K 1 n e_ Project Address: 1O(' 25 - 6a5+ Margiaa.L Waj ,62.dit. Contact Person: £ AL$-L- Y)LhLe Phone Number: fx0-4 -.5: -,?qq7 Summary of Revision: PeAr A lexA. LtelOttP 5 rd). /5, 42000 LG:tteir ; P1e.a6e, 4)10c, it affecciletL - i.diied-' (1 aple of t ie. vll orv�n I. CIO /O9 lead, AdD iAn J. ( alerli llcaL (?o-n.��;1�� -r� 4P_A- . fl 4aiic e_ emed6 by 3". a p /Yli. nw_ 71-it .Su,r r�StCcjx izeL, 01.11 -of inn 8L \u • Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Sierra on 06/29/99 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 z • • w J0. .0 O. U) J H Uw wo ti ¢ = a: Z zo` U� O -. • ,0 H w w: - O. Z. tii :U 2 O H z 03/07/00 17:09 FAX .' 'T. AGRA ENGINEEIIING 3lOCALSOLUTIONS March 7, 2000 9.91 M- 08219 -D • Northwestern Trust 1201 Third Avenue, 20`" Floor Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Subject: Mr. David Williams Geotechnical Considerations Former Skagen Marine Facility Seattle, Washington Dear Mr. Williams: 11002 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. 11335 NE 122nd Way Butte too Klrktand, Washington USA 980346918 Tel (425) 820 -1889 Fax (425) 821 -3914 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (AGRA) is pleased to submit this letter for the above- referenced project, which addresses environrnental concems by the City of Tukwila outlined in letters dated August 5, 1999 and February 15, 2000 from Ms. Alexa Berlow. AGRA previously completed a geotechnicai evaluation of the project site and submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Report (8- 91 M- 08219 -C) dated February 26, 1999. As outlined in our proposal letter dated September 10, 1999, our scope of work consisted of a meeting with the City of Tukwila and preparation of thls letter. We received written authorization for our work from David Kehle Architect on September 23, 1999. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Northwestern Trust, David Kehle Architect and their consultants, for specific application to this project, in accordance with generally accepted geotechnicaI engineering practice. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Previous development plans included remodeling the main Skagen Marine building which is in disrepair and has experienced significant differential settlements, demolishing the small adjacent wooden structure, and constructing a rock revetment along the shoreline of the• Duwamish River to prevent further shoreline degradation and improve existing slope stability. Current development plans include demolishing the main Skagen building and adjacent wooden structure, remodeling the existing Butler building and not improving the stability of the existing slope using a rock revetment due to prohibitive costs. The area of the main Skagen building will be asphalt paved and used as a storage area. We understand that to mitigate further river bank erosion that the bank will be vegetated with willow stakes above the high water mark to the top of the bank, SAWOROPROC■9 PrcleeU■Seoukw6000e100219 Nprtt weriern Tru,tfornier Skagen Malin FaciGly,wpd a�r.wnwwn.snMeFtiM�YM1 _ ... ..............._.... ,- ..,.. -... ....—.----_..,...-.......-....,.-.—.. ........».- ..........�......... t... n«..,•..a.v1rt iwtsFar :O 03/07/00 17:09 FAX Z003 Northwestern Trust March 7, 2000 9 -91 M- 08219 -D Page 2 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON RIVER BANK Based on our discussions with the City of Tukwila, we understand that in accordance with the Flood Zone Control Permit it is necessary to provide a river stabilization analysis to show how /if the building demolition will Impact the river bank. In our opinion, this analysis is not necessary since the proposed development will not involve construction of any new structures on ar near the river bank. Furthermore, we do not anticipate that demolition of the existing building will affect the existing river bank provided appropriate demolition /construction practices are utilized. These practices would include items such as adequate temporary erosion control systems in construction areas, dust control maintenance during demolition, and minimizing construction equipment traffic near the top of the river bank during demolition. All construction activity should be stopped and the City of Tukwila notified if river bank destabilization occurs. SLOPE MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS As the river bank has been subjected to and continues to experience erosion from river flow which has reduced slope stability over time, we recommend the condition of the slope be monitored. We recommend the owner examine the slope at a minimum on an annual basis for indications of reduced stability such as (1) exposed soil on the river bank; or (2) significant loss of ground; or (3) tension cracks developing on the slope or on upland portions of the site. If these conditions are apparent, we recommend AGRA be contacted immediately to observe slope conditions so that appropriate slope stabilization measures can be developed and implemented. CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report or any aspects of the project, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, .mes S. Oran Principal JSD /SAS /jdp Distribution: The Northwestern Trust (2) David Kehle Architect (1) Stephen A. Siebert, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Attn: Mr. David Williams Attn: Mr. David Kehle 5 1wORDPROC199 PrOJICI U'seatUaMICOCew9219 Nonmreelem Tru!L Former S>,agen Manna FnC7iry.NFa • AGRA Ea GINIENING GLOIAL SOLUTIONS z Z` fv•w 6s 00. N 0 w =. J i- N LL w 0' g • 5, LLQ. a • w F'=, z1._ 0. w~ • 0. O N; w w` H 0 LL '6` _z tit p s; 01- z `® 1 david kehle arc March 7, 2000 City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Ms. Alexa Berlow Re: Skagen Marine L99 -0009 Dear Alexa, Attached are revised documents from Adolfson & Assoc., AGRA letter supplement, survey (stamped) and a revised maintenance plan. These revised documents respond directly to your comments in your letter of February 15, 2000. Hopefully this will enable you to proceed with the approvals. If you have any questions, please call. David Kehle DK/mt Enclosure: 4 copies each: Adolfson Associates Analysis AGRA Survey Maintenance Plan cc: Diane Decker w/1 enclosure a:\973711et3-7bedg. 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 SEATTLE, WA 98168 (206) 433 -8997 FAX (206) 246 -8369 email: dkehle @seanet.com Environmental Solutions 29 ,February 2000 David Kehle, Architect 12720 Gateway Drive Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 SUBJECT: SKAGEN MARINE BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Dear Dave, Adolfson is pleased to provide the following revised biological analysis in response to the comment letter addressed to you by the City of Tukwila of 15 February 2000. As before, we are providing our Biological Analysis in the form of a SEPA checklist. Note that the City asked that peregrine falcon be added to the list of endangered species; however, peregrine falcon were recently de- listed completely (from their prior status as threatened), so that change is not reflected in the revised checklist. Also, note that the City has asked that alI'references to the use of non - native vegetation be removed from the checklist and that only native vegetation be used It is our understanding that the area between the river and the current building would be replanted with native species, but ornamentals would be used as foundation plantings elsewhere on the site. To comply with the City's, request, we have removed all references to non - native vegetation, but if you still wish to use ornamentals as part of the landscaping plan, perhaps you should discuss that with City staff. Lastly, the City's letter requests that the word "weeds" be replaced in a section #2; however, we prepared responses only under sections 4 and 5, and are unsure how to respond to . this item. Note, however, that the word "weeds" does not appear anywhere in the following text. 4. Plants a. Types of vegetation found on site: Deciduous trees: Black cottonwood, European white birch, ornamental cherry Evergreen trees: None observed Shrubs: Rubus discolor (Himalayan blackberry) ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 71 206 789 9658 lav 206 789 9684 adoyron ®ado f on{on Grass: Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) Pasture: None present in the project vicinity Wet Soil Plants: None present in the project vicinity Water Plants: None present in the project vicinity What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Himalayan blackberry (a non- native, invasive species) is the primary vegetation to be removed or altered during the demolition project. List threatened or endangered species or critical habitat known to be on or near the. site. No threatened or endangered plant species occur on or near the site. A field reconnaissance of the demolition area confirmed that habitat for threatened or endangered plants are not present. The demolition site is located in an area covered by blacktop. Describe proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on site. The site will be planted with native vegetation following demolition. Native plantings (for example, western red cedar, willows, salmonberry, dogwood, and Nootka rose) will be installed. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other (e.g., bass and other species that are not actively managed are likely to occasionally occur near the site) Amphibians: frogs, salamanders, other Reptiles: lizards, snakes, turtles, other Birds: hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, ducks, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other (rats, mice, raccoons, muskrat, river otter, sea lion) List any threatened or endangered species or critical habitat near the site. No threatened or endangered terrestrial wildlife species were observed, or are likely to occur, on the Skagen Marine site. Three fish and one avian species provided protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are present in the Duwamish River Basin: bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Puget Sound Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Puget Sound /Strait of. Georgia ESU coho salmon (0. kisutch), and Puget Sound /Coastal bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Bald Eagle The occurrence of bald eagles in Puget Sound and the Tukwila area has been documented since pre- settlement times (Stalmaster, 1987). Eagle populations have decreased within the region because of hunting and the widespread use of DDT, but their-numbers have been increasing since the early 1970's. They are currently listed as a threatened species, but are under consideration for de- listing. There are no bald eagle nests or known foraging areas within one mile of the Skagen Marine site (WDFW, 1999). The site has no trees considered suitable for perching or roosting. A transient bald eagle may occur within the vicinity during demolition, but eagle use in the'project area is unlikely due to the high level of ambient industrial - based noise. Fish Species The Duwamish River flows immediately adjacent to the project site, and is used as a migration route by several stocks of chinook and coho salmon (WDFW, 1994) as well as by lamprey. Chinook and coho salmon entering the Duwamish River are listed as threatened and candidate species, respectively, under the Endangered Species Act. 3 Chinook Salmon Puget Sound Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) chinook salmon are known to spawn in the Duwamish River from mid - September through October, though there are no known spawning grounds in the vicinity of the Skagen Marine site (WDFW, 1994). There is no critical habitat designated for Puget Sound ESU chinook salmon. Critical habitat is currently proposed by NMFS, though not yet granted specific protection. Proposed critical habitat includes all marine, estuarine and river reaches accessible to chinook salmon in Puget Sound (NMFS, 1999), including the Duwamish River. Chinook salmon are not expected to be affected by this project. Coho Salmon Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia ESU coho salmon typically enter freshwater from mid - September to mid - November, and spawn from late October to mid - January. No Critical Habitat has been proposed for Puget Sound /Straight of Georgia ESU coho salmon. Coho salmon are not expected to be impacted by this project. Bull Trout Information on the bull trout in the Duwamish /Green River basin is unavailable or extremely limited. There is no information on timing or distribution of spawning, if any. WDFW (1998) cites one source (Mongillo, 1993, cited in WDFW, 1998) as finding bull trout "Present" in the Green River. The USFWS has not established or identified critical habitat for coastal bull trout. Bull trout are not expected to be impacted by this demolition. References: NMFS. 1999. United States Department of the Interior, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Region Habitat Conservation Division, Northwest Region Species List. http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/1habcon/habweb/listnwr.htm. Updated 8/16/99. Stalmaster, M. V. 1987. The Bald Eagle. Universe Books. New York. 227 pages. WDFW. 1999. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Priority Habitats and Species Database. Olympia, Washington. September 21, 1999. WDFW. 1998. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Salmonid Stock Inventory: Bull Trout/Dolly Varden. 437 pp. 4 ra) WDFW. 1994. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory. Appendix 1: Puget Sound Stocks, South Puget Sound Volume.. Olympia, Washington. 371 pp. b. Is the site part of a migratory route? If so, explain. As noted above, the Duwamish River is a migratory route for several salmonids species as well as for lamprey. The site is also located within the Pacific Flyway, one of the four principal north-south migration routes for birds in North America. The Pacific Flyway encompasses the entire Puget Sound basin.. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. The project is not anticipated to impact wildlife. Site property adjacent to the Duwamish River will be planted with willow species to enhance bank stability and limit siltation. The demolition will remove three existing structures including slabs and foundations. The area between the Top-Of-Bank and buildings to be removed is presently asphalt in poor condition. This asphalt will be removed and replaced, and graded to drain away from the Duwamish River. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these revisions. Please call me if there are any further questions. Sincerely, ADOLF ON ASSOCIATES, INC. Andrew . Castelle Vice President 5 z • Z: 2LL/ 0: 0: U) W. WI. u_ uj 59_ • z o. z 1.11 2 a. D 0 o w (y F- 4-- co: o z Le. davit! kehle Rev. 2121100 Per City PROJECT: SKAGEN MARINE The following shall be the proposed maintenance requirements for landscaping and river bank: LANDSCAPE: 0 Contractors Warranty: The contractor shall be responsible for the health of all newly installed plants for two growing seasons and is defined as occurring from spring to spring. For fall installation, the growing season will begin the following spring. Contractor shall replace any plants that are failing, weak, defective in manner of growth, or dead during this growing season, as directed by the Landscape Architect, unless the failure of the plant materials is due to negligence of the Owner, or unless the failure is due to vandalism, severely cold winter weather, or other extreme natural phenomena or animal damage. Replacement plants shall be the same as the size and type as those originally installed unless otherwise directed by the Landscape Architect. Procurement and installation of replacement plants shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Replacement plants shall be inspected as described above for the original installation, and shall be warranted for 60 days following installation. Plants that have settled in their planting pits too deep, too shallow, loose, or crooked shall be replanted as directed by the Landscape Architect. Maintenance: Contractor shall maintain the plantings for a period of two growing seasons following installation. Maintenance Plan: 1. Irrigate all plant materials with approximately 1" of water per week from May through September of the first two seasons following installation to ensure survival and plant health. Naturally occurring precipitation may substitute for irrigation water application per weather conditions. 2. Remove weeds and grasses within the driplines of trees and shrubs maintaining a mulch ring at the base of each. Weed removal to be performed twice per year. 3 Replace all dead, dying or diseased plant materials during the first two years after installation. 4. Remove all litter, refuse, and non - native vegetation, e.g. Himalayan Blackberry, Reed Canary Grass, Evergreen Blackberry, Scots Broom, English Ivy, Morning Glory, Japanese Knotweed, etc. RIVER BANK: Slope Monitoring Recommendations As the river bank has been subjected to and continues to experience erosion from river flow, which has reduced slope stability over time, we recommend the condition of the slope be monitored. VVe recommend the Owner examine the slope at a minimum on an annual basis for indications of reduced stability such as 1) exposed soil on the river bank; or 2) significant loss of ground; or 3) tension cracks developing on the slope or on upland portions of the site. If these conditions are apparent, we recommend AGRA be contacted immediately to observe slope conditions so that appropriate slope stabilization measures can be developed and implemented. 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 SEATTLE, WA 98168 (206) 433 -8997 FAX (206) 246 -8369 email: dkehle @seanet.com City of Tukwila Department of Community Development February 15, 2000 David Kehle David Kehle Architect 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 Re: Skagen Marine Shoreline Substantial Development (File # L99 -0009) Dear. David Kehle: /f l Steven M.•Mullet, Mayor • Steve Lancaster, Director The revisions you submitted January 6, 200 have been reviewed and comments have been provided. They pertain to the new geotechnical report, biological analysis, and a maintenance schedule. Please review these comments and make corrections accordingly. Return edited copies to me as soon as possible. Comments pertain to each document submitted. They are as follows: Biological Assessment, prepared by Adolfson's Associates 1. In section # 2, replace "weeds" with "invasive /non - invasive vegetation ". 2. In section # 4 — Plants, item (a), change Shrubs to Robus discolor, and change Grass to Phalaris arundinacea. 3. In Section #4 (d), all references to non - native vegetation must be replaced with native plants only. 4. In section # 5 — Animals, please check that bass fish are still present; under Mammals, add river otter and sea lion. 5. Also in section # 5, add Peregrine Falcon to the list of endangered species, and correct the status of the Bald Eagle as "threatened ", rather than "endangered ". 6. In section # 5 (b), please note that the Duwamish River is also a migrating route for salmon and lamprey. The migratory route is calculated at 1.5 miles from the site. The surveyor's stamp and signature is necessary on sheet TI -4 of the survey. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 L99 -0009 Geotechnical Considerations, prepared by AGRA Skagen Marine Comments to Revision # 2 Page 2 1. On page 1 of 2, under Project Description, several items are listed in the first paragraph as having been part of previous development plans. Please indicate if these projects will be completed in this current proposal. Specifically, do you intend to construct a rock revetment along the shoreline? 2. On page 2 of 2, under Construction Impacts on River Bank, please add language to indicate that construction activity will be stopped and the City of Tukwila notified if bank destabilization occurs. Maintenance Plan, prepared by Skagen Marine 1. The maintenance time between the contract and the contractor needs to be corrected. Both must be for two (2) growing seasons. Currently, there is inconsistency among items # 3 and # 4 in the proposed plan. The remainder of your application and associated permits will be processed concurrently. If you have any questions about the above corrections, I can be reached at (206) 431 -3673. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Cc: Joanna Spencer, Public Works Tc� ; 410a. -FRoM ; t10/91\1U19- 00L,6e : Fee3 Ids 2050 �_ga-; ski 6, 2000 lG 69-047;61 / . &I le yea - 7-1-Rim. .) IV M 15 Na6o da Mph e at-e- ins i ce is t t 2Y oc to -, (4 -,,off NY/ 1r€) 22 ?vposed m2-621.0,n 0ce, .u.e;peA4 & l,,, rn ati friat4c& , e /'s //)-L cof9.s7/114.7 bey -e erc, • 1•611 ,r, reci . tz. G rd2 0i I rte' c erA r (&»io 14(2),4.4,14.624,1c.(2_ i�?�v� #�,2 5.L f-.ehce 5),Q-PL 11 /A VAS> IJE/MoN N,-77 V x71T o,) jeEHO c fg-c. " - /Uoi wEE(' • 3 I P&, CE /1-u- peke) z i./1 ; Tj/e PiesT 7l2 ,-'E,4/ S NQi bak,)NC, )t s Yom ` 4 sir c-L / ND/64-7 ,7,e- -77-do r-41gs. G�eo�eeh col dyed jo /i / l m - eats g4/- a •� 1�/ ice 62-`6 94) d Al _.• e4 44-0717. f - 0. -fsco o is Assoc . 73 A ,511,0li be ror'4ed -fee. l700� *5 6 - m.` /,o psi- wy;ce 1.5 I'1/ /rad -4.2 S VI S i Signature: Title: ID aa /i v 2c0 z 1W. re 2 6 U0• CO 0 W N LL W 0 =d t- W. Z W W U0 o - 0 I- I U, �-o V= o1_. z City of ,t7cw :Tyy"� •AleF°7 tt""k0 i." ••wt 47459a''Y.^•". ?r'hZA ffr,:::;7:at'vefii-A4-'.,q• 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tulcwila, Washington 98188 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM PATE: <S jB AC1: .CJJ 5_ 2-4) /� [ a /t/1 r 5f•.,,5 y,;, cup a,t,+,.,�S . V•IV, it'S4.1-7 3trt 'r.n:3ifi':ksrr"y;ir�:k�'+," (206) 433 -1800 ?e. IA at/t_ Soh rru a Uv� Y.eM ��/ . • l/li " -17YP � Z W J U• 0 0 W= u. W 0' Q N d ui 1 Z 0, Z D 0-- W W' 1--- V • W Z. ' U =, Z PROJECT: SKAGEN MARINE The following shall be the proposed maintenance requirements for landscaping and river bank: LANDSCAPE: Contractors Warranty: The contractor shall be responsible for the health of all newly installed plants for growing season is defined as occurring from spring to spring. For fall installation, the growing season will begin the following spring. Contractor shall replace any plants that are failing, weak, defective in manner of growth, or dead during this growing season, as directed by the Landscape Architect, unless the failure of the plant materials is due to negligence of the Owner, or unless the failure is due to vandalism, severely cold winter weather, or other extreme natural phenomena or animal damage. Replacement plants shall be the same as the size and type as those originally installed unless otherwise directed by the Landscape Architect. Procurement and installation of replacement plants shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Replacement plants shall be inspected as described above for the original installation, and shall be warranted for 60 days following installation. Plants that have settled in their planting pits too deep, too shallow, loose, or crooked shall be replanted as directed by the Landscape Architect. Maintenance: Contractor shall maintain the plantings for a period of installation. Maintenance Plan: 1. Irrigate all plant mate al ith approximately 1" of water per week from May through September of the first seasons following installation to ensure survival and plant health. Naturally occurring precipitation may substitute for irrigation water application per weather conditions. 1N1/143.va jNs *I H*7 Ve %NA,or e-7'%" 2. Remove weeds and grass within the driplines of trees and shrubs maintaining a mulch ring at the base of each. WAfeed removal to be performed twice per year. 3. Replace all dead, dying or diseased plant materials during the first eatafter installation. 4. Remove all litter, refuse, and non - native vegetation, e.g. Himalayan Blackberry, Reed Canary Grass, Evergreen Blackberry, Scots Broom, English Ivy, Morning Glory, Japanese Knotweed, etc. -- RIVER BANK: rowing seasoVfollowing s " j'Wo Slope Monitoring Recommendations As the river bank has been subjected to and continues to experience erosion from river flow, which has reduced slope stability over time, we recommend the condition of the slope be monitored. We recommend the Owner examine the slope at a minimum on an annual basis for indications of reduced stability such as 1) exposed soil on the river bank; or 2) significant loss of ground; or 3) tension cracks developing on the slope or on upland portions of the site. If these conditions are apparent, we recommend AGRA be contacted immediately to observe slope conditions so that appropriate slope stabilization measures can be developed and implemented. CITY OFTUKWILA L q9- 0009 JAN 1 8 2000 PERMIT CENTER .hrw,,VOV. ^ +nma z = I- :f- w 6 00 co 0 WI Jf.. w o' 2 u. d. �__ z� I-0 Z Imo. n0 U ON ar U wz U N'. F- : 0 H z %T.1i:h'ta:"SC; . 1 Y i.5ur' «�'At City of Tukwila 4151 John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director of G F 4'. .. ..Zir4: Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: 01 11201129 129 0 Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Plan Check/Permit Number: 1_ ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued Lqq -ooaq Project Name: Project Address: i bfiab a. h'i2gli "'" t, ' r 00. Contact Person:1201V Katie Phone Number: "!,Z • 43-2147 Summary of Revision: At/1U° 14112. I.%i etestio Notociot, 6 t *, htkfrietiatt Ovoute RECEIVED O Y hF TUKWILA JAN 1 8 2000 PERMIT CENTER Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision II Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: � \ W1190 ntered in Sierra on 1 U - © V 06/29/99 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z • w J0 0O . N0. w =: J 1- u_ wO u_Q 5.2 a I- w HO ,z I- w w O -; 0 I- w W; _ z` 'Li N: z .40 kehle '�� January 6, 2000 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Ms. Brenda Holt Re: Correction Letter #1 D99 -0324 Skagen Marine - Demo Dear Brenda, This resubmittal is in response to your correction letter #1, dated September 22, 1999. It has taken some time to gather the additional studies and documents and trying to get specific answers from staff on their requests. However, the following are responses to the various department comments: A) (Alexa's letter September 15th) The 10' x 10' patio previously shown has been eliminated entirely from the Shoreline Action, (also from the TI permit, which was separated from the Shoreline Action). (Alexa letter August 5th) 1. An updated Phase II Environmental Site Assessment by AGRA, dated October 20, 1999, Report #9-91M-08219-D, has been completed. AGRA did soil explorations beneath the existing slab and found the site to be below ecology standards and "no further action is warranted ". (4 copies enclosed). 2. A biological analysis regarding impacts of demolition was prepared by Adolfson Associates, Inc. dated December 21, 1999. This is formatted as a SEPA Checklist supplement. Per Adolfson, since no federal permit is required (no work below water line), therefore a full biological assessment going to NYMF's would not be required. This biological analysis does address and environmental concerns of emolition and lanting. (4 copies enclose "-s -recommended by Adolfson's biologist/botanists, willow plantings have been changed to cuttings /stakes spaced 12" apart, triangularly spaced (noted on landscape plan. 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 SEATTLE, WA 98168 (206) 433 -8997 FAX (206) 246 -8369 email: dkehle @seanet.com . • .z i 4„' w • U: •0 0 N 0 W= J 1- • W�� z � `I-0: z1 2 0; U ;o; ff' w w'. UJ Z • :o z Ms. Brenda Holt City of Tukwila Re: Skagen Marine January 6, 2000 Page 2 3. The survey (our site survey) has been updated to NGV datum with appropriate benchmarks. The survey ties into the street improvements, which were under city contract with Entranco. The city must request any changes to the Entranco survey. (4 copies attached). 4. Site cross - sections have been drawn at 50' intervals through the site. In addition, AGRA prepared a geotechnical considerations dated October 14, 1999, 91M-08219-D, which analyzed the geotechnical stabilizing of the bank in reference to the demolition. (4 copies are attached). 5. A maintenance plan for slope monitoring is within the AGRA Geotechnical report and I have attached the landscape monitoring plan. (4 copies attached). Brenda, I believe these additional reports and revised drawings reflect the concerns as outlined in Alexa's letters. If there are any other concerns or comments, please forward ASAP. Sin Davi . Ke le DK/mt Enclosure: AGRA Geotech. Report (4), AGRA Level II (4), Adolfson Biological Assessment (4), Survey (4), Cross- sections (4), Demo -1 (4), Landscape Plan (4) cc: Diane Decker (2 copies) a:\973711et1- 6bldg. A D O L F S O N Environmentai Solutions December 21, 1999 David Kehle, Architect 12720 Gateway. Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 SUBJECT: SKAGEN MARINE BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Kehler RECEIVED DEC 2 21999 DAVID KEHLE, ARCHITECT Adolfson is pleased to provide the following analysis in fulfillment of our contract for your . proposed demolition, grading, and revegetation of the Skagen Marine site in Tukwila, Washington. As you instructed, Adolfson staff conducted, a site evaluation and limited literature search to provide this analysis. These findings are confined to the likely impacts on plant and animal species, and are not intended to represent a complete SEPA analysis. We understand that the timely submittal of these materials is of utmost importance. A complete analysis, however, should include written contact with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Database. We have submitted letters to these agencies and have yet to receive a response. Nevertheless, Adolfson has investigated several projects that have involved actions in and around the Duwamish River, and we are confident that the eventual receipt of those responses will not alter our conclusions. The City of Tukwila has requested a Biological Assessment (BA), as required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, to ensure the protection of salmon in the ,Duwamish River. Adolfson has produced BAs for projects throughout Washington State. The criterion that triggers the need for a formal BA is that the project has a federal "nexus ". That is, federal agencies having funding, permitting, or direct authority over any construction project, must consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure the protection of endangered or threatened species. As we understand the Skagen Marine demolition project, there are no federal permits required to proceed. If the City of . Tukwila has no federal requirement to fulfill in issuing apeimit, a BA is not required. Further, all work is to be performed above the ordinary high water mark, and_nadirect, indirect, interdependent, interrelated, cumulative, or beneficial effects to the Duwamish River are expected. We are providing our Biological Analysis in the form of a SEPA checklist. The analysis follows: X99- 0009 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 7.t 206 789 9658 yar 206 789 9684 ado f on @adogion.em RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIIA JAN 18 2000 PERMIT CENTER 'Th David Kehle December 21, 1999 Page 2 .4. Plants a. Types of vegetation found on site: Deciduous trees: Black cottonwood, European white birch, ornamental cherry Evergreen trees: None observed Shrubs: Rubus procures (Himalayan blackberry) Grass: Phalaris awndinacea (Reed canary grass) Pasture: None present in the project vicinity Wet Soil Plants: None present in the project vicinity Water Plants: None present in the projectvicinity What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Himalayan blackberry (a non - native, invasive species) is the primary vegetation to be removed or altered during the demolition project. c. List threatened or endangered species.or critical habitat known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species occur on or near the site. A field reconnaissance of the demolition area confirmed that habitat for threatened or endangered plants are not present. The demolition site is located in an area covered by blacktop. d. Describe proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on site. The site will be planted with native and non - native vegetation following demolition. Native plantings (western red cedar, willows, salmonberry, dogwood, Nootka roe,) will occur from the Duwamish River ordinary high water mark to the vicinity of the existing building. Non - invasive, non - native ornamental vegetation (red maple, holly -leaf osmanthus, laurels) will be planted around buildings and parking areas. z ;_�. z• • .00 cn w. w =; J w0 u Q • = w• f-=, Z �. 1- o' • z I- •2 uf U� ww H V` w o iu _. . • • .z • David Kehle December 21, 1999 Page 3 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other . Amphibians: frogs, salamanders, other Reptiles: • lizards, snakes, turtles, other Birds: hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, ducks, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other (rats, mice, raccoons, muskrat) List any threatened or endangered species or critical habitat near the site. No threatened or endangered terrestrial wildlife species were observed, or are likely to occur, on the Skagen Marine site. Three fish, and one avian, species provided protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are present in the Duwamish River Basin: bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Puget Sound Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Puget Sound /Strait of Georgia ESU coho salmon (0. kisutch), and Puget Sound /Coastal bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Bald Eagle The occurrence of bald eagles in Puget Sound and the Tukwila area has been documented since pre - settlement times (Stalmaster, 1987). Eagle populations have decreased within the region because of hunting and the widespread use of DDT, but their numbers have been increasing since the early 1970's, and the species is currently under consideration for de- listing. There are no bald eagle nests or known foraging areas within one mile of the Skagen Marine site (WDFW, 1999): The site has no trees considered suitable for perching or roosting. A transient bald eagle may occur within the vicinity during demolition, but eagle use in the project area is unlikely due to the high level of ambient industrial - based noise. Fish Species The Duwamish River flows immediately adjacent to the project site, and is used as a migration route by several stocks of chinook and coho salmon (WDFW, 1994). Chinook and coho salmon entering the Duwamish River are listed as Threatened and Candidate species, respectively, under the Endangered Species Act. Chinook Salmon Puget Sound Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) chinook salmon are known to - _- . tomft 1M'1RYC14WSCpMw~amr.evrox w9wv ...,.ww z Wiz' It w 6 UO' J 1- w °: u- Q: ° �_ z� w ~, moo, 0 F- w H — �: o wz U N'; z David Kehle December2l, 1999 Page 4 spawn in the Duwamish River from mid - September through October, though there are no known spawning grounds in the vicinity of the Skagen Marine site (WDFW, 1994). , . There is no critical habitat designated for Puget Sound ESU chinook salmon. Critical habitat is currently proposed by NMFS, though not yet granted specific protection. Proposed critical habitat includes all marine, estuarine and river reaches accessible to chinook salmon in Puget Sound (NMFS, '1999), including the Duwamish River. Chinook salmon are not expected to be affected by this project. Coho Salmon Puget Sound /Strait of Georgia ESU coho salmon typically enter freshwater from mid- September to mid - November, and spawn from late October to mid - January. • No Critical Habitat has been proposed for Puget Sound /Straight of Georgia ESU coho salmon. Coho salmon are not expected to be impacted by this project. BuII Trout Information on the bull trout in the Duwamish /Green River basin is unavailable or extremely limited. There is no information on timing or distribution of spawning, if any. WDFW (1998) cites one source (Mongillo, 1993, cited in WDFW, 1998) as finding bull trout "Present" in the Green River. The USFWS has not established or identified critical habitat for coastal bull trout. Bull trout are not expected to be impacted by this demolition. References: NMFS. 1999. United States Department of the Interior, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Region Habitat Conservation Division, Northwest Region Species List. • http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/1habcon/habweb/listnwr.htm. Updated 8/16/99. Stalmaster, M. V. 1987. The Bald Eagle. Universe Books. New York. 227 pages. . WDFW. 1999. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Priority Habitats and Species Database. Olympia, Washington. September 21, 1999. WDFW. 1998. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Salmonid Stock Inventory: Bull Trout/Dolly Varden. 437 pp. z W: 6 D. J o; oo: co o. mow; w =: ,w ;. 2 ga D. F_ .z� o• .z 0 •w — o,. • • ui z = o • z..' David Kehle December 21, 1999 Page 5 WDFW. 1994. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory. Appendix 1: Puget Sound Stocks, South Puget Sound Volume. Olympia, Washington. 371 pp. b. Is the site part of a migratory route? If so, explain. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, one of the four principal north -south migration routes for birds in North America. The Pacific Flyway encompasses the . entire Puget Sound basin. c. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. The project is not anticipated to impact wildlife. Site property adjacent to the Duwamish River will be planted with willow species to enhance bank stability and limit siltation. The demolition will remove three existing structures including slabs and foundations. The area between the Top -Of -Bank andbuildings to be removed is presently asphalt in poor condition. This asphalt will be removed and replaced, and graded to drain away from the Duwamish River. You also requested comments and suggestions on the landscape plan. Adolfson botanists suggest that, as the landscape plans call for willow plantings above the ordinary high water mark for bank stabilization and erosion control, the use of willows for this purpose is more cost effective if cuttings are planted, rather than the designed rooted plants. Standard practice in using willow for bank stabilization is to use "stakes" (also referred to as "cuttings") rather than rooted plants, spaced 12 inches apart triangularly. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this biological analysis. Please call me if I can clarify any point. Sincerely, ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Brian S. Bigler Senior Fisheries Biologist ..... .....�..�..:aKOtkc:.if:�WGi..:l AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS October 20, 1999 9 -91 M- 08219 -D Northwestern Trust 1201 Third Avenue, 20th Floor Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. David Williams Subject: Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Former Skagen Marine Facility 10625 -29 East Marginal Way Seattle, Washington Dear Mr. Williams: AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. 11335 NE 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington USA 98034 -6919 Tel (425) 820 -4669 Fax (425) 821 -3914 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (AGRA) is pleased to present the following Limited Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment Report. The purpose of this investigation was to assess whether there are potential contaminants beneath the existing floor slab prior to demolition. This report includes AGRA's observations, subsurface investigation data, laboratory analytical results, and conclusions regarding the site assessment activities. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the former Skagen Marine facility located at 10625 -29 East Marginal Way in Seattle Washington (Figure 1). This site consists of an irregularly shaped parcel that measures about 370 feet by 135 feet overall and encompasses approximately one acre. Site boundaries are generally delineated by an undeveloped property to the north, by a commercial development to the south, by the Duwamish River on the west, and by the intersection of East Marginal Way and Pacific Highway South on the east. Currently, the following three unoccupied buildings exist at the site: (1) a one -story L- shaped, wood framed building (the main Skagen Marine Building); (2) a rectangular shaped Butler building; and (3) a small wood framed structure adjacent to the north end of the main building. The bank of the Duwamish River is heavily vegetated with blackberry bushes. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF WORK AGRA was contracted by Northwestern Trust to assess subsurface soil conditions beneath the existing concrete floor slab for the presence of priority pollutant metals and other organic contaminants, prior to demolition. To accomplish this, five soil boring explorations were advanced S:IWORDPROC199 Projects1Sealtle108000s108219 Northwestern Trust \Ltd Phase II ESA.wpd OOO9 q r 00 0 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWII.A JAN 1 8 2000 PERMIT CENTER z = F- Z w; .t4� J U; 0 0. N 0 . w. W H wO • 12 a 2: • i- _. zi... z o. w w. 2 D. ON. '0 H. w w. O; ,vCO; • A-1_, -. 'z 1 AI • • t..• Northwestern Trust October 20, 1999 9 -91 M- 08219 -D Page 2 randomly throughout the building (SP -1, SP -2, SP -3, SP -4, and SP -5). The approximate locations of the soil borings are depicted on Figure 2. The borings explorations were advanced by Transglobal Environmental Geosciences Northwest (TEG), Inc. of Lacey, Washington using a truck - mounted Strataprobe system. This drilling method uses hydraulic rams and a percussion hammer to push the sampling tools into the formation, obtaining a continuous soil core. The soil sample is collected in a 2 -inch diameter, 2- to 4 -foot length, steel, split -spoon samplers. Soil samples were classified in the field and screened for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons using an organic vapor meter (OVM). The OVM is a type of photoionization detector capable of providing semiquantitative data with respect to the presence of volatile organic compounds. Based on the results of the field screening readings, and AGRA's observations, select soil samples were submitted to AGRA's Washington certified laboratory, located in Portland Oregon. The soil samples were submitted for analysis of: • • Priority Pollutant Metals (Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Selenium, Silver, Thallium, and Zinc) by EPA Method 3050B/6010B. No apparent evidence of organic contaminants was observed during the drilling activities, therefore, soil samples were not submitted for analysis of volatile or semi - volatile organic compounds. The data collected during the assessment was interpreted by AGRA and presented within the contents of this report. SITE ASSESSMENT RESULTS On September 30, 1999, AGRA arrived at the subject site and performed the site assessment activities described in the previous section. The borings were advanced to depths ranging from one 1 to 9 feet below the existing ground surface. Based on the estimated depths of the potential contaminant sources, these depths were anticipated to be sufficient to detect the target compounds under the existing concrete floor slab, if present. Subsurface soil conditions encountered consisted of what appeared to be one to nine feet of fill consisting of moist, brown, fine to medium sand over a 4- inch -thick concrete floor slab. The specific soil conditions encountered are depicted on the attached boring logs for explorations SP -1 through SP -5. A contiguous water - bearing unit was not encountered during exploration activities. Evidence of perched groundwater (groundwater that is unconfined but isolated from a contiguous aquifer system by an unsaturated zone) was not encountered in any of the explorations. Soil samples were collected on continuous basis in all explorations using a 4 -foot sampler. Select depth intervals were placed in laboratory- prepared containers and preserved in an iced cooler S:\WORDPROC \99 Projects1SeattIe108000s108219 Northwestern Trust \Ltd Phase II ESA.wpd •.hracx: e.4•^rs:tiT:X ^� s— .emu•,. AGRA ENGINEERIN3 .1.0BAL SOLUTIONS z mow: - 0 00 N 0 wi J H. w V.. w0 J u-? w d. = W z� z0 - 0 I—. = U. O uiz. u) O~ • tir Northwestern Trust October 20, 1999 9 -91 M- 08219 -D Page 3 pending transport to the analytical laboratory under AGRA's chain -of- custody procedures. Select soil samples were then chosen for laboratory analysis based on AGRA's field observations and field screening results. The soil analytical results have been summarized in Table 1. The laboratory analytical test certificates have been presented as an attachment to this report. The soil samples are identified according to the location followed by a suffix indicating the approximate depth the sample was collected ( " -3 " represents an approximate depth of zero to three feet below grade and " -6" represents an approximate depth of three to six feet below grade). TABLE 1 • SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS Sample ID Depth (feet) OVM Sb As Be Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Se Ag Th Zn (a) SP1 -3 0 -3 ND <5.0 3.7 0.099 0.32 15 32 81 0.142 12 <5.0 <3.7 <5.0 110 (b) (b) (b) (a) SP2 -6 3 -6 ND <5.0 1.7 0.088 <0.75 8.1 7.0 <3.7 <0.100 5.3 <5.0 <3.7 <5.0 15 (b) (b) (a) SP3 -3 0 -3 ND <4.8 1.5 0.12 (b) <0.73 9.2 11 0.47 <0.100 6.8 <4.8 <3.6 <4.8 18 . • (b) (b) (a) SP4 -6 3 -6 ND <5.2 2.5 0.13 (b) <0.78 12 13 1.4 <0.100 8.5 <5.2 <3.9 <5.2 20 (b) (b) (b) SP5 -3 0 -3 ND <4.5 1.8 0.070 <0.68 9.5 12 0.93 <0.100 7.9 <4.5 <3.4 <4.5 19 (b) (b) (b) Method Detection Limit 0.15 0.075 0.0025 0.014 0.020 0.14 0.07 N/A 0.13 0.070 0.10 0.15 0.085 0 Method Reporting Limit 1.0 0.75 0.050 0.15 0.25 1.0 0.75 0.100 0.75 1.0 0.75 1.0 0.75 MTCA Method A Cleanup N/A 200 N/A 10 500 N/A 10 0 1.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MTCA Method B Cleanup N/A 219 0.233 80 N/A 2,960 N/A 24 N/A 400 400 N/A 24,000 Level MTCA Method C Cleanup N/A 66.7 30.5 3,500 N/A a +6 N/A 1,050 N/A 17,500 17,500 N/A 1.05 e+6 Notes: Sb = Antimony; As = Arsenic; Be = Beryllium; Cd = Cadmium; Cr = Chromium; Cu = Copper; Pb = lead; Hg = Mercury; Ni = Nickel; Se = Selenium; Ag = Silver; Th = Thallium; Zn = Zinc • (a) Results are from a 1:5 dilution (b) Estimated value because the analyte concentration is between the method reporting limit and the detection limit. All concentrations are presented in parts per million concentration units (ppm). OVM = Organic vapor, meter ND = None Detected (g) N/A = Not Applicable S: \WORDPROC \99 Projects \Seattle\08000s\C8219 Northwestern Trust \Ltd Phase I1 ESA.wpd AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LL WO:. gQ cn = Cl• F_ W: Z� I- 0 Z LLI H. �p U a 0 , W HU u- O Z. W •~' O Z • 12. 4 Northwestern Trust 9-91M-08219-D October 20, 1999 Page 4 CONCLUSIONS • Based on the analytical results of the soil samples collected during this assessment, and that the site is zoned as a manufacturing heavy industrial area (MICH), concentrations of priority pollutant metals are below Ecology's MTCA Method A, Method B, and Method C cleanup levels. No further actions should be warranted. CLOSURE The information contained in this report is based on site characterization data, field observations, and laboratory analytical testing accomplished for this assessment. The conclusions presented herein are professional opinions based on AGRA's experience and interpretation of the analytical test results and field observations. The locations and depths of the explorations, as well as the analytical scope, were generally completed within the site and proposal constraints established in the approved contract. AGRA appreciates the opportunity to be of service to Northwestern Trust on this project. If you have any additional questions or comments regarding the contents of this report, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (425) 820 -4669 at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, iL ./ Je -ry ' =spa Senior Project Geologist DW /JK/jdp Attachments: Figure 1 — Location Map • Figure 2 — Site and Exploration Plan Soil Boring Logs Laboratory Analytical Test Certificates cc: Mr. Steve Siebert, AGRA S:\WORDPROC199 Projects \Seattle \080005\08219 Northwestern Trust \Ltd Phase 11 ESA.wpd 'y`yl.. a.. .. AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS ,,r z re w J0 00 CO o . U)w w =. Jt— . w 0. u_ <. id z �. z o, Do' CI I::; ww h=- V — z. w u) H � -0 z z (-- z 6 cW U0 CD MI W CO W O u. N Py H W Z W O 0 co W W. 1y 1: LI Z W U =, 0 z mike, i • J D Z n Al \ l t -- �etsa=f�. , • •01'`10• \ \ - :•\ �`�+ \'l� 5 �� �j �� -.` \) ^••grrz8, 4. 'mac - - {r ::t: ammo" '. : �y •C: 1 - a ' i : /: . 5q t liE ..-.. _ ., •??. fir., �j /, :Y 'J Kp` . ;: ,� l ii., t� ST !I ' Dr{ VA2 �} _ 'S < i Q r^ 1 A. I I .' t'LYIILIY•+ ,;. r. !1 Tpl �r E sDI', *a .5 I \'A N 1• • � _ \b� • 1),_ i lLl� '.f z% r. STa , 'v . -s ' '^' Rain/at s { ., 2SATLE 11,1,6 II V ' sr €- nr �wc ,: to to � = • \ �`^ .:4,..... \\. « ,,�(�"- �`N�+ � F1t .^Y i Z ^tl 5 apwo t ' `e • al f� O \� �� ES snot u n u t I` I i >< if s RDEN ! Sas 014iE 0 5T :: a.FA•. • ap• _ :. �� t, � r ✓ \\,{•tL.a! ......"1: : r ' -e \ .....4." '. \ . e'.3....: a'',- d 3,`• S ^�17C3S1ER ST t I __ All TIST 0 i i; a' = 4`S71N Si w10EM ' ST sT •, tMELtt ..o X t I .. L , �. / ''(11 `, 11101tofr i mw ,.Fly' S - r,MSi.':; \ \ >R S CH PORTtANp ST I - : �•.. I _ ,n ST $ H CHICAGO ^ST cu. c 1 N ST 'i \• r 8 , ° ,6L \ • ,try `: ` P( R y: 'tE .. f Qb� ! t S {EMTON .. ,,, S KW( ST Si ,!, 1.b-• . s :au + y •..i. .. LJitMI • f5 LEj�� LL`MST4 'n cion •• .E _ '` . it Y .« H = r i n l sr VI n an ,n :';y, I •< , �iI 5l -' .{nnNm 1,2129 ce ISWO xtof :- "e J .4..•':; `. ,CI n ` •°:... : 3• ♦ 1•' \ ,- , :s : \ \•... t. ,`� • • - = 1E' . : ` ; LIIS s ^{ i aim =t , :: R'° ,�L ��.; .. t AT �1 v LAKE /C WASHINGT . F• `.0 ,- A. N • ` ` et t1 c ';\ } •.+• N1 34 ttip S TRHNTON t 41 -01 _~ 1 J ■ i s ItHENOERSON ■R \L1•.t '1 S :`�`tre a. =• S 3E ; u.Ili* EF! =.sr N' < t p 011 1l 5 ::D ► 8so loo ST 1;; . :: _ ' r ,\ .' , { - _ + ' T2dV -. ',y � = V\ .,D"'� • rt[ru. • st S FLE TLN R - ■:' �I �M• \ r . _, Sl < < a =i i t a em - y i4�• s , ,, ^ .00- '^ .'� :rued•,: ,:_.' 1�_y�"_+.^. ..: S WIMPY .n L�' °ii m� i' is � PIL IN i T S�4¢yl .,vi. - 1 J. '+P� ,... ^, 51t� .�, ` s1l • ` �' 4 ,r •� \ •.... Ofy \ ' .. J• r' .. �� a SMARM n 31 t '" SZ A 3 .� lq \ \\ . - II,�; IT— ' ;: ''<{ L. S (Amu sfsj, '.'t••,•ti��,. • ,, h' Vii � sN Siil�f .: , v� ` =� ��, ; " ' v ��....1 • ~ \ , ,� `.• a 'nl 1I i ..4. �s CO:02 1 t.e }.., • S 1111 sT i v _v,l Si y 13 K'•{`• = < f r.l S Ss f•F,, r ©= N PREF CE S 1 �t ti c 5> t � ��jjS I ST !." < S: �116a A] Qi" ts4, ♦� v.3 iE ...e0:1111511911411 �Y .o• { �, WEE sr t .1M1t m `� 5/I - L/ �` tN 1¢.t.,,: �� \ t „BOO • ST f: ' 1 •1 • -., -d ;,:.. f' A r.. t ,n z F < I-, < T \� • I f.1 ®'' � N in5:t Gg...: 1� 'O & L LL : F31.]W .\ to A �`. ,t: 1 • •'. ' ' •Y • 7 A 4'. \ \\ S ::; 99 \ \ 5 I1, V �^ '` �I KWI�. ...� h11:!• .'iE' - '' • '- . rfir t • 04 �s ,z; AI tli AS d,• S t7A. WI .t i1. . I �: •ST.•'0''�:. < "'s G,1 • • - •-,:� • mh :� ':: '. ,:3;�'lITN� St S LEO ❑ ! \ STST 5.: • T. _ t :.> / r'\ E,:. W .:, ,, : ?��P !� 6M 11;V 11612 ! 5T 7 ...f.: i.r.:: "•.:• \ \ \\\� • SS IlS21M5 `� '. ° i t Es - •C~ .. •.:. ,e s•' .. i•„nMx - '`' 4, \ \. . C�►.•4•T b.' IM Osl':,.,i• • IlSitj - =• 15LN:.,.: ;\,\\�.r' Y' iSN Ri.�''I.1�:, \% J51i % ' iYY S? 11GTN ia. 1 n is I \ • 1fTSH �.. . • 1• S A20N ST T N1 iioi tuA • sr., r \Q1 _ = T NA. L -' .' .: \\\ r ^ 4frt. .•I S ,n �J > {AUG175T4 STi „ ' \ < i=.n * <;= J t \t h; 11 st Si_lif6TH STs lta. , s rn O s_IILTM. N .,, s t n / ! I i�s � 11TTH 1IrTH P L ST u. j PL 1 _ \ +s S'I6tk . • : tie..n . � : L:. :.:� !'$� _ x M ► r = P : . ' . 4 3 TM� Sr=wtuCE yST IIBTN .4 - .,t_' •: I;: h 9 -` \ \\ ' S A JUNIPER ST ?1ST 71ST AV1 S., MD AY S f, MI �� 44'1. SU;, � t�y� • v'\ �w��► '. u �R . ., • .,1 -• U N rn at 1 O N 1 • O Lal a ii • 0 o 3 0 0 Q, Reproduced with permission py THOMAS BROS. MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is fv N. T. S. unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. m o L^ AGRA o ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS z 11335 N.E. 122nd Way, Suite 100 as Kirkland, WA, U.S.A. 98034 -6918 LOCATION MAP FORMER SKAGEN MARINE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON FIGURE z (-- z 6 cW U0 CD MI W CO W O u. N Py H W Z W O 0 co W W. 1y 1: LI Z W U =, 0 z mike, i P 0 0 w ro= st.opE ske DUWAM /SH. RIVER SP -3 SP -2 SP -4 MAIN BUILDING SP -1 SP -5 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH LEGEND SP -6 CD SOIL PROBE NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION • EAST MARGINAL WAY AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 11335 N.E. 122nd w: Kirkland, WA, U.S.A. 9803469 B 30 60 C J SCALE IN FEET SITE & EXPLORATION PLAN FORMER SKAGEN MARINE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON FIGURE 2 Z LU ct 2 JU O O: U0: co W; LU is WO:. u. J' = W.. Z� !Ujm!: Z 0, jO co 0 f- W. 10, Z. ,'U tn: O H' Z SOIL BORING LOGS AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS I! :: 1 ',. 'J‘, '?;, PROJECT: Former Skagen Marine W.O. 9-91M-O i 9-D WELL No. SP-1 Elevation reference: Ground surface elevation: Well completed: Casing elevation: AS-BUILT DESIGN SQL DESCRIPTION C/) U) C.) C..) CD w w a- a. 2 ?- < wc U.1 CL 2 2 < z (1) Ci) 0 CO >0 o cc Z Ceul 0< CL Concrete floor slab 5 Moist, brown to black, medium-grained SAND Moist, brown, silty fine SAND 3 3 Moist to wet, gray, medium-grained SAND with trace silt 3 S-1/3 S-3/6 S-6/9 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 TESTING a Priority Metals Terminated at 9 feet - 10- - 15 0-j 2.00-inth OD split•Spaan sampler LEGEND nique Ecology Well No.No well install( d Groundwater Level 7 A NALYTI CAL TESTS (6 AG RA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 11335 N.E. 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034-6913 Drilling started: 30 September 1999 Drilling completed: 30 September 1999 41011.10"Billtratmlatestsreeevxmr*.m...vem Logged By: GAN \„. , I PROJECT: Former Skagen Marine --)flity W.O. 9-91M-C 19-0 WELL No. SP-2 • • • 1' 1 1 1 1 Elevation reference: Ground surface elevation: -- a. LLJ' 0- SOIL DESCRIPTION 5 Concrete floor slab Moist to wet, gray, medium-grained SAND with trace silt Well completed: Casing elevation: cn — co CI- w a. a. 3 AS-BUILT DESIGN W CC W 0- 03 2 2 < co z z 0 n —J 0 03 0 > o o z w 0< cc 3 3 S-1/3 S-3/6 S-6/9 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 TESTING Priority -, Pollut. Metals Terminated at 9 feet - 10- - 15 I2.00-inch OD split-Spoon sampler t. nique Ecology Well No.No well install d LEGEND Ts ANALYTICAL TESTS szGroundwater Level Fluctuation AGRA ENGINEERVG GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 11335 N.E. 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034-6913 Drilling started: 30 September 1999 Drilling completed: 30 September 1999 Logged By: GAN • • l PROJECT: Former Skagen Marine "`cility W.O. 9- 91M- `- '119 -D WELL No. SP -3 Elevation reference: Ground surface elevation: Well completed: Casing elevation: AS -BUILT DESIGN SOIL DESCRIPTION Concrete floor slab 5 Moist, brown, fine- grained SAND c) cn 0 w J 0 w a Jill CL CD ¢� <n z en u) OO mV >o O� cc Z 3 Moist, brown, fine- grained sandy SILT Moist to wet, brown, medium - grained SAND with trace silt 3 3 S -1/3 S -3/6 S -619 0 0 0 Page 1 of 1 TESTING 2 Priority ti Pollut. Metals Terminated at 9 feet -10- a O nr 0 z Q Ci .r7.1 z L nique Ecology Well No.No well installe d 2.O0•inch OD split•Spoon LEGEND sampler 4 Groundwater Level Fluctuation 71 ANALYTICAL TESTS 4 AG RA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 11335 N.E. 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 -6913 Drilling started: 30 September 1999 se: Drilling completed: 30 September 1999 Logged By: GAN z 1—w 44Y J U 2 Wes. 00 W = w• 0. g fU_ _, • I— ILI Z I-: I- O z V :ON wW. IL ~; Z; "L . z • •; .4 PROJECT: Former Skagen Marin(ciiity W.O. 9 -91M- 119 -D WELL No. SP -4 Elevation reference: Ground surface elevation: Well completed: Casing elevation:. AS -BUILT DESIGN a.. al —0 SOIL DESCRIPTION 0) U= cn a a w fiE. a>- rn am <z .z 0 mp>o Occ O= Z w 0 1 Concrete floor slab Moist, brown to grey fine- grained SAND Moist, brown, silty fine SAND 3 S -1/3 Moist to wet, brown, fine- grained SAND with trace silt Moist, brown, silty fine SAND -10- 0 Moist to wet, gray, fine to medium - grained SAND with trace silt Terminated at 9 feet 0? -15 2 m 2.00•inch OD split-Spoon sampler 3 0. Q d 0, .i S -316 3 S-6/9 Page 1 of 1 TESTING Priority - Pollut. Metals L nique Ecology Well No.No well installe d LEGEND 4 Groundwater Level Fluctuation ` ANALYTICAL TESTS Gn AG RA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 11335 N.E. 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 -6913 Drilling started: 30 September 1999 Drilling completed: 30 September 1999 Logged By: GAN ii 1 1 1 } PROJECT: Former Skagen Marine�ility W.O. 9 -91M -t. 19 -D WELL No. SP -5 Elevation reference: Ground surface elevation: Well completed: Casing elevation: AS -BUILT DESIGN SOIL DESCRIPTION 5 Concrete floor slab Moist, brown, fine- grained SAND with trace silt w J a to w o. 3 Wet, brown, silty fine SAND 3 3 am (/) z S-1/3 S -3/6 S -6/9 �ti) o: J0 mV C7 2? >o o� tY 0 0 0 Z w M re 0 Q Page 1 of 1 TESTING 2 Priority - Pollut. Metals Terminated at 9 feet -10- -15 m2.03.inch 00 split•Spoon sampler 1. nique Ecology Well No.No well installe d LEGEND Groundwater Level Fluctuation J C ANALYTICAL TESTS Gn AG RA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 11335 N.E. 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 -6913 Drilling started: 30 September 1999 Drilling completed: 30 September 1999 Logged By: GAN Z S • tY.W 6 00: W W: W =, W O` g u. cp LU 2 Z I— O` Z w. W C] I— W W. IVi: W sir Z m, Z LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TEST CERTIFICATES AG RA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS Ipleg IA xs eF x�mwy119s1111R1�f -3031 +""rEetemsel U UOi W = J W a IL`Q 'co D< ZH ZH,` AU on a 10 Y24 to II U.. wi _ Z> - )•I y•r 1 } AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS October 13, 1999 AGRA Earth & Environmental • 11335 NE 122nd Way, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. 7477 SW Tech Center Drive Portland, Oregon USA 97223.8025 Tel •(503) 639 - 3400.. Fax (503) 620 -7892 Attention: Jeff Kasper Dear: Mr. Kaspar: RE: Analytical Results For Project 9-91M-08219D Attached are the results for the samples submitted on October 1, 1999 from the above referenced project. For your reference, our project number associated with these samples is WA990944. The samples were analyzed at the AGRA Earth & Environmental Portland Chemistry Laboratory. The samples were also subcontracted to North Creek Analytical, Inc (NCA) for mercury analysis. The NCA results will be reported under separate cover as soon as they are available. All analyses were conducted in accordance with applicable QA/QC guidelines. The results apply only to the samples submitted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this report, or if I can be of any assistance in any other matter. Respectfully submitted, can ormley Laboratory Manager z 6 JU: U0: (1) V) LLJ lu 0;. _a - 0' Z D U0 t7 1— 1- _z• 0 N?. O~ z Project: i Project No.: I.. Project Manager: Sample Matrix •, Sample Name: Lab Code: Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Date Collected: Date Digested: Date Analyzed: ND Not Detected Skagen Marina 9 -91 M- 08219D Jeff Kaspar Soil Total Metals in Soil /Sediment by ICP -OES EPA Methods 3050B/6010B mg /Kg(ppm) Dry Weight Basis Service Request No.: WA990944 Report No.: 99094401 Report Date: 10/13/99 COC• No.: 03797 Method Method (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) Detection Reporting SP1 -3 SP2 -6 SP3 -3 SP4 -6 SP5 -3 Lab Blank Limit Limit 944 -1 944 -5 944 -7 944 -11 944 -13 944 -MB (MDL) (MRL) <5.0 <5.0 <4.8 <5.2 <4.5 ND 0.15 1.0 3.7(b) 1.7(b) 1.5(b) 2.5(b) 1.8(b) ND 0.075 0.75 0.099(b) 0.088(b) 0.12(b) 0.13(b) 0.070(b) ND 0.0025 0.050 0.32(b) <0.75 <0.73 <0.78 <0.68 ND 0.014 0.15 15 8.1 9.2 12 9.5 0.036(b, c) 0.020 0.25 32 7.0 11 13 12 ND 0.14 1.0 81 <3.7 0.47(b) 1.4(b) 0.93(b) ND 0.070 0.75 12 5.3 6.8 8.5 7.9 ND 0.13 0.75 <5.0 <5.0 <4.8 <5.2 <4.5 ND 0.070 1.0 <3.7 <3.7 <3.6 <3.9 <3.4 ND 0.10 0.75 <5.0 <5.0 <4.8 <5.2 <4.5 ND 0.15 1.0 110 15 18 20 19 0.32(b, c) 0.085 0.75 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 10/11/99 10/11/99 10/11/99 10/11/99 10/11/99 ,..(a) Results are from a 1:5 dilution. (b) Estimated value because the analyte concentration is between the method reporting limit and the detection limit. (c) The analyte was found in the laboratory blank. Since the analyte concentration in the sample is greater than 10 times the amount found in the lab blank, it is the opinion of the laboratory that the usability of the data has not been adversely affected. H '1 1 �� AG RA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLU "ICNS 1 Acceptance Limits: Project: Project No.: Project Manager: Sample Matrbc Sample Name: Lab Code: Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc f(a) Estimated value because the analyte concentration is between the method reporting limit and the detection limit. Sample Date: Digestion Date: Analysis Date: Skagen Marina 9 -91 M- 08219D Jeff Kaspar Soil Service Request No.: WA990944 Report Date: 10/13/99 Report No.: 99094404 C.O.C. No.: 03797 QC Data Report- Blank Spike Recoveries Total Metals in Soil /Sediment by ICP -OES EPA Methods 3050B/6010B mg/kg(ppm) Spike Percent Blank Percent - -• •Relative Lab Blank Level Blank Recovery Spike Recovery Percent 944 -MB (mg/kg) • Spike (BS) Duplicate (BSD) Difference <1.0 25 23 92 23 92 <1 <0.75 25 22 88 22 88 <1 <0.050 5.0 4.4 88, 4.4 88 <1 <0.15 10 9.1 91 9.2 92 1 0.036(a) 25 23 92 23 92 <1 <1.0 25 23 92 23 92 <1 <0.75 25 22 88 21 84 5 <0.75 25 23 92 23 92 <1 <1.0 25 23 92 24 96 4 <0.75 2.5 2.3 92 2.2 88 4 <1.0 25 22 88 22 88 <1 0.32(a) 25 23 91 23 91 <1 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 Spike Source: AEE Lot # 99- 07 -2 -11 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 75% -125% — 75% -125% < 25 10/8/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 • AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS Z re 2 u6D; JU 00 N 0' U) w= u_ O It Q; w m o Z uj U� ;Ocn. w W: —O off, z Project: Project No.: Project Manager: Sample Matrix Sample Name: Lab Code: Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Acceptance Limits: Sample Date: Digestion Date: Analysis Date: Skagen Marina 9 -91 M- 08219D Jeff Kaspar Soil QC Data Report- Matrix Spike Recoveries Total Metals in Soil and Sediment by ICP -OES EPA Methods 3050B/6010B mg /kg(ppm) (a) Spike • (a) Percent SP5 -3 Level Matrix Recovery 944 -13 (mg/kg) Spike (MS) <4.5 26 9.6 37(c) 1.8(b) 26 26 93 0.070(b) 5.2 5.0 95 <0.68 10 10 100 9.5 26 35 98 12 26 38 100 0.93(b) 26 25 93 . 7.9 26 34 100 <4.5 26 27 104 <3.4 2.6 2.2(b) (d) <4.5 26 24 92 19 26 27 108 9/30/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 9/30/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 75 %- 125% Service Request No.: WA990944 Report Date: 10/13/99 Report No.: 99094403 C.O.C. No.: 03797 Spike Source: AEE Lot # 99- 07 -2 -11 (a) Results are from a 1:5 dilution. (b) Estimated value because the analyte concentration is between the method reporting limit and the detection limit. (c) Outside of AEE acceptance limits. Since the Blank Spike recoveries are within acceptance limits, it is the opinion of the laboratory that the low recovery does not adversely affect the usability of the data. (d) Not applicable because the analysis of the sample required a dilution that reduced the spike concentration below the method reporting limit. AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS Project: Project No.: Project Manager: Sample Matrix Sample Name: Lab Code: Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Control Limits: Skagen Marina 9 -91 M- 08219D Jeff Kaspar Soil Sample Date: Digestion Date: Analysis Date: (a) SP5 -3 944 -13 <4.5 1.8(b) 0.070(b) <0.68 9.5 12 0.93(b) 7.9 <4.5 <3.4 <4.5 19 Service Request No.: WA990944 Report Date: 10/13/99 Report No.: 99094402 C.O.C. No.: 03797 QC Data Report- Duplicate Report Total Metals by in Soil and Sediment by ICP -OES EPA Methods 3050B/6010B mg /kg(ppm) 9/30/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 (a) Sample Duplicate 944- 13 -DUP <4.7 3.3(b) 0.10(b) <0.70 8.8 11 <3.5 7.0 <4.7 <3.5 <4.7 18 9/30/99 10/8/99 10/11/99 Relative Percent Difference (c) (c) (c) (c) 8 9 (c) 12 (c) (c) 5 <25 (a) Results are from a 1:5 dilution. (b) Estimated value because the analyte concentration is between the method reporting limit and the detection limit. (c) Not applicable when sample concentration is less than the method reporting limit. Signer G eh AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS z w: . `U 0 N w; m: -J w o; J; •u-< . _; z F... 7- a zf-, = U`.. • F- 0 z AGRA Earth & <awironmental Portland Chemistry Laboratory Sample Receipt Documentation Form Project: 5 (e-4' r• 11 f41.41.1' ; ,•• D,5--- , 3. \ Cooler Temperatures J ,, C0 .5-, 3 .S SR No.: ivir, 9e.) ii/y Date: ZCll /0 % Time: % % // y5 Temperate re of Cosjor.4.1pon Receipt (Record to the Right): Received By: C / Section One: Shipping/Delivery Issues 1. Method of Sample Delivery: U Pj--- Yes 2. Airbill or Courier Receipt Number: 1 ?E I -Si' a C51 `-(G S—/ e /Y 3. Is a copy of the airbill or courier receipt available to be placed in the job file? `Y No NA Section Two: Sample Custody Issues 4. Are custody seals on the shipping container intact? Yes No , r� N6 5. Is a COC or other sample transmittal document present? .. es No NA 6. Is the COC complete? (Y No NA 7. Are the sample seals intact? Yes No NA 8. Does the COC match the samples received? (6 No NA Section Three: Sample Integrity Issues 9. Are all sample containers intact and not leaking? CY.e.si No NA 10. Are all samples preserved properly? Y No 40ml VOA vials: 11. Are all samples within holding time for the required tests? 17. No NA 12. *Were all samples received at the proper temperature? Yes._. No NA 13. Are samples for volatiles and other headspace sensitive parameters free of headspace or bubbles? Yes No C1Ql Section Four: Sample Containers Received: 14.4 • oz. glass jars: 19. 2oz. amber (MeOH): 15. 8 oz. glass jars: 1g 20. Encore samplers: 16, 40ml VOA vials: 21. 500m1 plastic: 17. 1 liter glass: 22. 1liter plastic: 18. Other (describe): `Temperatures for: soil and water = 4 °C -6 °C, McOH jars = 25 °C, air = not required Reviewed By: Laboratory Manager or Desig ee C 9 AGRA Earth & Environmental 11335 NE 122nd Way, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 -6918 Tel (206) 820 -4669 Fax (206) 821 -3914 03797 CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROJECT _ > �a� PROJECT No. q-- ii,44.^-05%t �D �l ANALYSIS REQUESTED (circle, check box or write preferred method in box) CLIENT n PHONE No. BTEX by EPA 602 / 8020 p BTEX /WTPH -G o WTPH -D / WTPH -D EXTENDED TPH by EPA 8015 MODIFIED WTPH -418.1 MODIFIED TPH by EPA 418.1 GC / MS EPA 624 / 8240 or EPA 8260 Volables GC /MS EPA625/8270 Semi- volatiles VOCs EPA 601 / 8010 or EPA 602 / 8020 i a w Q LEAD EPA 6010 / EPA 7421 Total / Dissolved TOTAL METALS TCLP C. Q `per DATE TIME ,Q 2. PRO ECT MANAGER kfF /pp PHO E No. SAMP ER'S NAME (please print) i e L C PHONE No. SAMP t R'S SIGN: E I C e �" •LE I.D. DATE TIME MATRIX PRESERVATIVE CONTAINERS No. VOL. 1 'P1 -3 `730 N . ,�O/t A SGa X k 2.SPI_ 3.9,/_,,, 5. J e2 -4, 6.sv:,,0 9.5P . _c9 ,o.S.P;,,_ 7c X. SAMPLE RECEIPT . , 5 LABORATORY e.) . TURNAROUND TIME SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS / ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Lq 40 TOTAL N CONTAINERS SHIPPING I.D. / AIRBILL N A/ +r ❑ 8 HOUR ❑ 24 HOUR ❑ 1 WEEK ?2 WEEK (standard) i ❑ OTHER PAGE__`— OF CONDITION OF CONTAINERS r .7{r/ CARRIER CONDITIO OF SEALS DOT DESIGNATION RELI Q SHED BY / AFFILIATION DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION DATE TIME ,Q 2. Z (i I z- 1. 2. AZ-Giak�U *%l ff'f� 3. 3. err� AGRA Earth 8, Environmental, Inc. (7/94) DISTRIBUTION: White, Yellow - Laboratory, Pink - Originator - � (A)A-109& z Q n, J V UO rno WW. W W o u.a —d. (�. u i Z lZ0 uj U� 0 U2 C1 I— W. 1-- U tLZ. 0_, O i -T., I AG RA Earth & Environmental 11335 NE 122nd Way, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034 -6918 Tel (206) 820 -4669 Fax (206) 821 -3914 t___E ,t__t , t___c I_. ■ I... ■ z �Z r -Jo 0 03798 cw 1 CHAIN OF CUSTODY W } g lL < I W z 0 D V =IW; LL H. O. wZ U co H = O F" z PROJECT S 6trti AtteI me_ PROJECT No. �..--7rt-(- eg Off_ /1 ANALYSIS REQUESTED (circle, check box or write preferred method in box) OLIN ^4 PHONE No. BTEX by EPA 602 / 8020 x = x m o V =_ > 1 . WTPH -D 1 WTPH -D EXTENDED TPH by EPA 8015 MODIFIED WTPH -418.1 MODIFIED a W = z a. GC / MS EPA 624 / 8240 or EPA 8260 Volatiles GC /MS EPA625/8270 Semi- volatiles VOCs EPA 601 / 8010 or EPA 602 / 8020 PCBs EPA 608 /8080 LEAD EPA 6010 / EPA 7421 Total1 Dissolved TOTAL METALS TCLP CQ �Q o �� PROJECT MANAGER PH0I ENo. SA ER'S NAME (pl asa print) PHONE No. SAMP SIGN UR PLE I.D. DATE TIME MATRIX PRESERVATIVE CONTAINERS VOL. No, 1. Se ,,, -[ �o )4J 1 So /(- /94 i X Pc Wfgt 51.25—s• .-51P 8. 9. • T„ :AMPLE RECEIPT /l j LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIME SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS / ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TOTAL N CONTAINERS SHIPPING I.D. / AIRBILL # CONDITION OF CONTAINERS CARRIER CONDITION OF SEALS DOT DESIGNATION ❑ 8 HOUR ❑ 24 HOUR `D 1 WEEK / .{4 2 WEEK (standard) I ❑`OTHER LINQ ISHED BY / AFFILIATION DATE TIME ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION DATE TIME /604 ._. /39 to o. AGHA Earth & EnvIronnwntal, Inc. (/194) 1. 2. DISTRIBUTION: White, Yellow - Laborfory, Pink - Originator / / ;,S -PAGE OF 11 i.4 219,7L FROM : NORTH CREEK RNFILYT I CM_ TO 040 nca. 1M Www.ncelabs,canl Agra Earth and Environmental, Inn 7477 S.W.'1'cch Cutler Drive Portland, OP 97223 -R0 ?4 1 E036-2. 036110 'fayL 1 »>, i1',— +y Se111I0 WI :111 171111i Avenue NI , ROW 1(11, Ik4ln:11, WA 90011 9900 OH Spokonc 1:191 1111h Mi. uoty. ro1119It, l :puk,n:e. WA n1t'fb 4119 L1111.n7.1woo lox 9119.974.0911 I'orll�ua 94(19 :;14' Ni tIii i Av1awF IloitVCrlon, lilt 97008.7I:1/ 911:i.1109,100 lax 9113 {!000.0710 Bona NKr.' 1 HON Avrtlllr, tiuite 1 1. Omni. (1119/ 191 WI 911 :Mt 4:110 lox 541.3H7 7b88 Project: Skagen Marine Project Number: 9.91M- 082191) Project Manager: Scan Clornllcy knotplcd: 9 /30/99. Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/90 16:12 ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES: Sample Description Laboratory Sample Number Simple. Matt ix llute Sampled S1'1 -3 1'910025 -01 S1'2 -6 P910025.02 SI'3.3 1'910025.03 S1'4 -6 1'910025 -04 P5-3. P910025 -U5 North Creek Annlytieal - Poi tland Soil Soil Soil Soil 9/30/99 9/;10/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 The results in /his report apply in the sews /ales a►lalyec d in accordance Will the chnln of custody document. 711ls analy /icnl report must be reproduced 0: Its entirety. 1 •. Asa ,'+iiiitit3++' ' Pcojjx anngcr North Crank Annlyticel, Inc. Envlronntuutel Laboratory Network ■ . FROM : NORTH CREEK ANALYT I CAL TO 1 503620 7892 3.. r .1.10- 1.1. MJ, • .—.e . 8 seRIlle 111939 120111 Avrnun NI , Soho 101, IlnlIiv1 , WA UB0I 1 0500 42S.420.0700 Ixr ^170 Q•! 10 nCal M SnoKano t ast 11115 MUntp /, Sutlt: t1, 6pnk :mn, WA UUt'UI, 1IIV 5IUb ii .5Nim tax vonlicA Henn, I'o111iat0 9435 Ub. Nimbus A 33.90 .971(1 u, 0l1 U1uU8 / IN o03!JUti'J7UV IU+c 5U3.90ri,8710 Nen° 70332 6muiru Avenue. Sulle 1.1, nom, nit 1)11111 )4111 www,ncalabs.com 541.305'1 :1111 lint b41.382.7500 !AP I% V.arth UM 1:i vironmenlNl, loo Project; Skagen Marine 7477 S.W.'1'cch Center Drive Project Number: 9- 9IM- 082191) .1'nriland, OK 97223 -8024 Project Manager: Scan Gormley Sampled; 9/30/99 Re civcd: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 Total Meta1!t per EPA 6000 /7000 Series Methods North Creek Aunlyticsl - Portland hatch Dale Dale Specific Reporting Number Prepared Annlyzcd Method Limit Result lJnits Nntcs+ ?S Soil P J } Mercury 10+90181 10/7/99 10/7/99 l:l'A 7471A 0.100 0.142 m /kg dry i S11 -6 1'91002542 Sall Mercury 109018R 10/7/49 10/7/99 EPA 7471A 0.100 NI) ntg /kgdly SEW J'910015•03 Nall Mercury 109018t 10/7/09 10/7/99 EPA 7471A 0.100 NI) mg/kgdry 51'4.6 1'910Q25_1141 • Mercury 11190188 10/7/99 10/7/99 IPA 747IA 0.100 NI) mg/kg (dry cl'$- j +910Q2 Sall Mercury 11/90188 10/7/99 10/7/99 Isl'A 747IA 0.100 NI) mg/kg dry i j North C :reek Anilly(icul • Portland ltoluenighini, Project Manager 'RcJ +r 10 end of report for lexl of notes and definitions. North Crook Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network par,. ..+ 1s Z • LYW+ • u�� J U o O u)o • N W: W=, J J: >Z 1— 1— W' --V . .1 • • Z • • 0F.; O 2 • FROM :NORTH CREEK FINRLYTICPL TO 1 S03820 7892 www,rraelabs.com Agt>,1'.ucth and Envirrnvnentnl, lac 7477 S.W. '1'cch Cclilel' Drive Purllund, OR 97223 -R024 S1'1 -3 S1'3.3 SV4 -6 51'5.3 1999,10 -11 04:15PM #405 P.08/10 Sce11IO 10000 170111 Avn --40I ,:;Dili: 101. Ilulhcll, WA 08011.9400 470 470 071111 , :t 470 9710 SpoklOe I 31 1111:: Mumv..nicly, Sohn fI, Spnkanc, WA 00208 47/0 0090974.0700 Ira 409.0r4.9990 rwnund .9400 OW Nunuu;: Avenue. Ileavciton, OR 97008 -/13' on:4 (1111; 07(10 lox 603.900.9910 Oend 71133Y 1 nu Av:DaD :, k1tale 1 1. Rend, Oil 97/01.5711 l4 1 :III :10 ::1(1 I:, v 041.:187. / 1411 Project: Skagen Marine lhajl :cl Number: 9- 91M.082191) Project Manager: San Wattle), Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10 /1/99 _Reported; 10/11199 16:12 Dry Weight Determination North Creek Analytical - Portland 1.ah 11) Mnlria ... Result Units Nor 1 C:rcck AiaJ)44c0 • Pinlltuu 1'910025 -01 Soil 84.6 % 1'910025 -02 Soil 92.0 % P910025 -03 Soil 92.9 9i, 1910025.04 Soil R3.4 % P910025 -05 Soil 87.1 % I,isu DomcniChln1, Project Mnlwgcr North Creek Analytical, Inc. Fnvironnicntnl Laboratory Network Nee 3 of 5 W 6 5' J U: UO: Np; ,. N W' W S`. J �: W O. co z: O; z . t-;. wi • !UO N,. p 1—' 'W 1— O:. z �.0 O ~' z FROM :NORTH CREEK ANALYTICAL TO 1 S03520 7992 www.ncalabs.cont 4 . Agra Eatt11 And Environmentnl, Inc 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland, OR 97223 -8024 1 Analyte Project: Skagen Marine Project Number: 9-91M-082191) Project Manager: Scan (iormlcy 1999,10 11 04115PM #405 P.09/10 Saeuje I(ln :111 I7UU1 At NI , Suitt 101, ttu1Ucll. WA AA011- 9n08 4?b,4?0.11%00 tax 4:b 0U.'J71U Spokane 1 ata 11111, Manlnonroly, Suite U. Spokane. WA A9?O0•4 %IG 1109.8 ?4.9200 fax :ins 191.9)J0 I'mtl3n11 94Ub SW Nimbus Avunuo. llr,,vcnon, 0119 /000.713p b13.9tH1'..9 UU inz 503.000.0? 10 fiend /U3:1? 1 moue Amite. ;;Idle 1-1, Hand, 1)1i 9/191.5711 1,41 3H3 1131n lax 1+41.30.7;40 Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16 :12 Total Metals tier 1J' PA 6000/7000 Series Methods /Quality Control • 'North Creek Analytical - 'PorU.auti Date Spike Sample QC: Reporting Unlit Recuv, ki'1) RP1) Analyzed Level Result Result Units Rccov, Limits % Limit a/o Notes' Hatch; 1090m T)atc Prepared; 10/7199 Mink 1944108 -BLK1 Mercury LCS Mercury UU)ticate Mercury. Mntrix Spike Mercury M, Iris Snikc Mercury i .Method: EPA 7471 10/7/99 NI) itig/kg, dry 0.0100 1090188 -BS1 10/7/99 1.00 L04 mg /kg dry 80.0.120 104 1090iR8-nu1!1 p910071 -41. 10/7/99 (1.92(1 0.914 mg/kg dry ,OQO188 -MS1 p910071 -01 10/7/99 1.08 0,920 1.97 mg /kg dry 75.0 -125 97.2 1.090188-MSSaa p909507 -01 10/7/99 1.28 NI) 1.34 mg /kg dry 75.0 -125 105 • North Creek Analytical - Portland • . Lisa 1)untcnighini, Project Manager 40.0 0.654 "&fir to end of report for text of now and definitions. North Crock Analytical, Inc. Envihtrnntentnllaboratory Network Ilona A FROM :NORTH CREEK ANALYTICAL TO QncaM www.ncalabs.conl Agin I,nr11) and I ?nvirunnlenlnl, hu: 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive I'or1111nd, OR 97: ?73 -8024 tI« NI) NR dry 3. 503620 7892 1999,10 -11 04:16PM #405 P. 10/10 7;uulllu I8:189 I70111 A'",NI. SOiln 1111. Ilulhull, WA 90011.9rn0 47!a.47h 991111' 15 470.9710 Spokane 1 mil 11111, Munluuumry. A11110 0, St/09411c. WA 092011•47/6 1,011.074.0900 lox 500.974.97A0 l'orilnnd MM. ;:W Nuudux Avuuuu. 0cnvnrInn, orr 070u8 /137 903 0111..117181 tax x4111 911110710 Rood 7u314.1 I tullhc Avulnlc. Suite 1.1. MALI, 011 9 /01.5711 1111 :01:198111 Inr 641.502.7500 Project; Skagen Marine Project Number: 9-91 M- 01;2191) Project M:1nngur: Scan Gormley Nntc 'teeny. 12P1) Notes and Uctinitinnv •Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 Amllytr 1)I:'1'li(:'11:3) Mtnlytc NUT 1)1 FIitrIV.1) at or ubuvc the reporting limit Not Reported . Sample results reported on n dry wciyht basis Recovery Relative laurc:ant Difference. tot) C:rcck Analytical - i'nrllnnd Lisa 1)unlcnighini, Project MonaAcr North Greek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network It... -.. t -P r AGRA ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS October 14, 1999 AGRA Earth & Environmental 11335 NE 122nd Way, Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. 7477 SW Tech Center Drive Portland, Oregon USA 97223-8025 Tel (503) 639 -3400 Fax (503) 620-7892 Attention: Jeff Kaspar Dear: Mr. Kaspar: RE: Analytical Results For Project 9-91M-08219D Attached are thesubcontracted results for the samples submitted on October 1, 1999 from the above referenced project. For your reference, our project number associated with these samples is WA990944. The samples were subcontracted to North Creek Analytical, Inc (NCA). All analyses were conducted in accordance with applicable QA/QC guidelines. The results apply only to the samples submitted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this report, or if I can be of any assistance in any other matter. Respectfully submitted, Sean Gormley Laboratory Manager z ,_1:. Jo 00: CO O; • W =' w 0:: a 71.. w. z 1=0 z Au i0 co, p 1—; �.w W H V' w a _Z tir 0 'z • ncam www.ncalabs.com Seattle 18939 120th AIL JE, Suite 101, Bothell. WA 98011.9508 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 Spokane East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206.4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 OCT q 1999 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue. Beaverton. OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 lax °'=='C 11G1 D J 7 1999 Bend 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F1 , Bend, OR 97701-5711 V 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 Agra Earth and Environmental, Inc 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland, OR 97223 -8024 Project: Skagen Marine Project Number: 9-91M-08219D Project Manager: Sean Gormley Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES: Sample Description Laboratory Sample Number Sample Matrix Date Sampled SP1 -3 ' SP2 -6 SP3 -3 SP4 -6 • SP5 -3 P910025 -01 P910025 -02 P910025 -03 P910025 -04 P910025 -05 Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 9/30/99 North Creek Analytical - Portland isa The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. , Pro 'y anager uLSiG..LN.'G.-•1J'bi . w,^ c.... 'rY;;., .',Y�i.'4�iw•�.....a.... North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 1 of 5 ncaTM www.ncalabs.com Seattle 18939 120th Av 1E, Suite 101, Bothell, WA 98011.9508 425.420.9200 t6. _5.420.9210 Spokane East 11115 Montgomery. Suite B, Spokane. WA 99206-4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 Portland 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue. Beaverton. OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 lax 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Empire Avenue. Suite F -1, Bend. OR 97701-5711 541.383.9310 tax 541.382.7588 Agra Earth and Environmental, Inc 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland, OR 97223 -8024 Project: Skagen Marine Project Number: 9 -91 M- 08219D Project Manager: Sean Gormley Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 Total Metals per EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods North Creek Analytical - Portland Analyte Batch Date Date Specific Reporting Number Prepared Analyzed Method Limit Result Units Notes* SP1 -3 Mercury SP2-6 Mercury SP3 -3 Mercury SP4 -6 Mercury SP5 -3 Mercury P910025 -01 1090188 10/7/99 10/7/99 EPA 7471A Soil 0.100 0.142 mg/kg dry P910025 -02 Soil 1090188 10/7/99 10/7/99 EPA 7471A 0.100 ND mg/kg dry P910025 -03 Soil 1090188 10/7/99 10/7/99 EPA 7471A 0.100 ND mg/kg dry P910025 -04 1090188 10/7/99 10/7/99 EPA 7471A 0.100 of ND mg/kg dry P910025 -05 Soil 1090188 10/7/99 10/7/99 EPA 7471A 0.100 ND mg/kg dry North Creek Analytical - Portland *Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions. Lisa Domenighini, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 2 of 5 www.ncalabs.com Seattle 18939 120th Avr —t1NE, Suite 101, Bothell, WA 98011.9508 425.420.9200 15.420.9210 Spokane East 11115 Mon,e.,,nery, Suite 8, Spokane. WA 99206-4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 Portland 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton. OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701-5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 Agra Earth and Environmental, Inc 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland, OR 97223 -8024 Project: Skagen Marine Project Number: 9-91M-08219D Project Manager: Sean Gormley Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 Dry Weight Determination North Creek Analytical - Portland Sample Name Lab ID Matrix Result Units SP1 -3 SP2 -6 SP3 -3 SP4 -6 SP5 -3 P910025 -01 P910025 -02 Soil P910025 -03 Soil P910025 -04 Soil P910025 -05 Soil Soil 84.6 % 92.0 % 92.9 % 83.4 % 87.1 % Creek . - ' a - Portlan Lisa Domenighini, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 3 of 5 ncaTf�n www.ncalabs.com Seattle Spokane Portland Bend 18939 120th AverlE, Suite 101. Bothell, WA 98011-9508 425.420.9200 la 11420.9210 East 11115 MontgL...er /, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206-4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue. Beaverton, OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 tax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue. Suite F -1. Bend. OR 97701-5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 Agra Earth and Environmental, Inc ;7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive dPortland, OR 97223 -8024 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Skagen Marine 9-91M-08219D Sean Gormley Sampled: 9/30/99 • Received: 10/1/99 • Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 Total Metals:'per EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods /Quali : North Creek Analytical - Portland; Analyte Batch: 1090188 Blank Mercury ICS Mercury Duplicate `Mercury Matrix Spike Mercury Matrix Spike Mercury Date Analyzed Spike Sample Level Result QC Result Reporting Limit Recov. RPD RPD Units Recov. Limits • % Limit % Notes' Date Prepared: 10/7/99 1090188 -BLK1 10/7/99 1090188 -BSI 10/7/99 1.00 1090188 -DUP 1 10/7/99 1090188 -MS1 10/7/99 1090188 -MS2 10/7/99 P910071 -01 0.920 P910071 -01 1.08 0.920 P909507 -01 1.28 ND Extraction Method: EPA 7471 ND mg/kg dry 1.04 mg/kg dry 0.914 mg/kg dry 1.97 mg/kg dry 1.34 mg/kg dry 0.0100 80.0 -120 104 75.0 -125 97.2 75.0 -125 105 40.0 0.654 North Creek Analytical - Portland Lisa Domenighini, Project Manager *Refer to end of report for text of notes and definitions. North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 4 of 5 Z Q H eW 0 O, • NW; • WI W O}}; J. =0 • HW z�. za • ..11J W: 2 a; DO • .0 W t!J' • • 0; • .11l Z. www.ncalabs.com Seattle 18939 120th Ave-^9E, Suite 101, Bothell, WA 98011.9508 425.420.92001 3.420.9210 Spokane East 11115 Month_, iery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206-4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 Portland 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton. OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701-5711 ' 541.383.9310 tax 541.382.7588 Agra Earth and Environmental, Inc 7477 S.W. Tech Center Drive Portland, OR 97223 -8024 Project: Skagen Marine Project Number: 9-91M-082 I 9D Project Manager: Sean Gormley Sampled: 9/30/99 Received: 10/1/99 Reported: 10/11/99 16:12 Notes and Definitions Note DET Analyte DETECTED 1 ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit NR Not Reported dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis Recov. Recovery RPD Relative Percent Difference Creek Analytical - Portland Lisa Domenighini, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc, Environmental Laboratory Network Page 5of5 nca. North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Labordory Network www.ocalobs.cu,t 1(V.(') 12lllhAvcnt East 11115 M 9405 S. 20332 Emp hc(I, WA 98011 -9508 (- 125) - 12(1.92(10 FAX 420.92I0 98206 --1776 (509) 924 -9200 FAX 924 -9290- 2 97008 -7132 (503) 906 -9200 FAX 906 -9210 . ems" Ile 001, Bend, Ly2 97701 -5711 (541) 383 -9310 FAX 382 -7588 CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT Work Order #: CLIENT: /9) t' INVOICE TO: TURNAROUND �� I..�J Y /'U. Yclrolewn I J Li) Organic � REQUEST (-& inorganic t_ ■ in Business Days* Analyses REPORT TO j e( . C{ 0 rM AI)I)RI:SS: Dr?LI7? SLJ IC/eA Cert•Per— 1 -. - ?,V'`( t K Yu . t Vie (?7-.4. PI IONE: tp3 1 - 3y00 IZAX: (r)U-'-7F y S- t�.J <1 1lydnxartxm ( -� Analyses 12...) UJ Please Specify < i P.O. NUMBER: PROJECT NAAIIi: 5'kgfeA Pi" -Pi A e PROJECT NUMBER: y _911„...0?-,A ' i' SAMPLE() B 6 r • AC.C3 11 RE:QUES'1'EI) ANALYSES STD. •' fianwu (OTHER um/ Kryuorslnsthan Uw :inJ may incur RwhChas ,,. CLIENT SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION SAMPI.IN(I DATE /TIME l'IME MATRIX (W, S, 0) // OF CONT. COMMENTS •C NCt. J. 2. SQ a L 3. sc) 3 . -3 • 4 q 5. 5P5' -- 4 .. 6. 7. 8. 1(1. II. `4 -Y _ 12. 13. Rl t.IN(1t11SlII l) IIY:v`.7.21"ra—'-a% PRINT NAME: :?C�.1 .41, r e z• f/� DAM: '5��/ ff 111tAl:?1 �pz)x 'TIME: I)A'1•E, /b—) -Q'i f1ItM: Nln TIME: RIs('ElVlil> Ifl: PRINT NAME: REC10VEEl)!)Y: I'IRIN'I'NAMIE: ....I DATE: /0^ /47 FIRM: NCA, TIME: (3 )0 U�1( DATE: f1�g41 FIRM: N�lA. TIME: [1 406 L \j /j (�a 1)��fj((� It1Ei.INolislllil)Ity:C. -� I'RIN'I'NAAR :: G�r„� y�jr1v►ll A1)1)1'l'IONAI.I(IdMAI(KS: / ^ �j // % 6%" 4 )'Y7'I/ I TEMP: From: Alexa Berlow To: Joanna Spencer Date: 10/19/99 2:47PM Subject: skagen marine just a follow -up to my earlier e-mail: i talked with jack and he confirmed that a SEPA is NOT required for the tenant improvement poposed by skagen, even if the building is in the shoreline environment. a SEPA would be required if tenant improvements involved an "intensification of the use ". -alexa. Staff Report to the Planning Commission L99 -0070 Tukwila International Boulevard Urban Renewal Plan The draft Redevelopment/Rehabilitation Analysis Map (Attachment X) indicates land that ' z will most likely be acquired, redeveloped or rehabilited by either the City or a private . _ entity in the urban renewal area. \ ce w —i U U O• CO 0 CO uJ: 1. The draft Tukwila International Boulevard Renewal and Revitalization Plan tu = J 1_ . conforms to the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. It implements goals and policies of co u_: the adopted plan to create an attractive, safe and profitable place to do business, W O work and live and to develop a strategic and financial plan that facilitate private and g public investment in the Pacific Highway Corridor. n g a; I-_, 2. The draft Plan is sufficiently complete to indicate land acquisition, demolition, z H redevelopment and rehabilitation. z 0. 11.1 ju 3. The proposed urban renewal area experiences a disproportionate share of crime as D Cl well as a higher percentage of violent crime as compared with the rest of the City. CONCLUSIONS .O CO .0I- 4. There exists a site that is substantially dilapidated and deteriorated that constitutes a v u.0. Z. uirn' 5. The area has serious physical obstacles due to the history of platting, state highway 1 0 z menace to public safety. acquisition and subsequent private ownership adjustments. 6. These conditions impair the desirability of this area of the City as a safe attractive residential community, retard the provision of housing accommodations, and constitute an economic and social liability. These conditions constitute a menace to public safety, morals, health, and welfare. 7. A combination of redevelopment and rehabilitation are necessary within the proposed urban renewal area in the interest of the public health, safety morals or welfare of the residents of Tukwila. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Findings and Conclusions and recommend approval of the proposed urban renewal plan. C: \mcb \UR \STAFFrpt.doc Page 10 of 11 945e -rs crtivau u-w-- 91 T( AGRA �, ;� RECEIVED AGRA Earth & ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS �+ C° �� Environmental, Inc. �,.��' OCT 1 8 1999 11335 NE 122nd Way nft Suite 100 c� ��9J BY: Kirkland, Washington 0CT (� USA 98034 -6919 �` � "y�, Tel (425) 8210 3964 October 14, 1999 cr ptiLM .\ z 9 -91 M 08219 -D C3 \.- \. f- z' w r4 2, Northwestern Trust _1 o 1201 Third Avenue, 20th Floor co o Seattle, Washington 98101 co = Ilk J H U) u. w 0: 2 LQ co o: = a. t~_' zi. F- O Z f-• Do • O u) ' AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (AGRA) is pleased to submit this letter for the above - referenced o F-: project which addresses recent environmental concerns by the City of Tukwila outlined in a letter w w' dated August 5, 1999 from Ms. Alexa Berlow. AGRA previously completed a geotechnical ►_- �; z. evaluation of the project site and submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Report (8 -91 M- 08219 -C) u. O: dated February 26, 1999. , v u) As outlined in our proposal letter dated September 10, 1999, our scope of work consisted of a z meeting with the City of Tukwila and preparation of this letter. We received written authorization for our work from David Kehle Architect on September 23, 1999. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Northwestern Trust, David Kehle Architect and their consultants, for �. specific application to this project, in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice. Attention: Subject: Mr. David Williams Geotechnical Considerations Former Skagen Marine Facility Seattle, Washington Dear Mr. Williams: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Previous development plans included remodeling the main Skagen Marine building which is in disrepair and has experienced significant differential settlements, demolishing the small adjacent wooden structure, and constructing a rock revetment along the shoreline of the Duwamish River to prevent further shoreline degradation and improve existing slope stability. Current development plans include demolishing the main Skagen building and adjacent wooden structure, remodeling the existing Butler building and not improving the stability of the existing slope due to prohibitive costs. The area of the main Skagen building will be asphalt paved and used as a storage area. We understand that to mitigate further river bank erosion that the bank will be vegetated with willow stakes above the high water mark to the top of the bank. \\ Kirkland _main \VOL11SHARED \WORDPROC\99 Projects\Seattle108000s \08219 Northwestern Trust Skagen Marine Riverbank Impacts Ltr.wpd Northwestern Trust October 14, 1999 9 -91 M- 08219 -D Page 2 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ON RIVER BANK Based on our discussions with the City of Tukwila, we understand that in accordance with the Flood Zone Control Permit it is necessary to provide a river stabilization analysis to show how /if the building demolition will impact the river bank. In our opinion, this analysis is not necessary since the proposed development will not involve construction of any new structures on or near the river bank. Furthermore, we do not anticipate that demolition of the existing building will affect the existing river bank provided appropriate demolition /construction practices are utilized. These practices would include items such as adequate temporary erosion control systems in construction areas, dust control maintenance during demolition, and minimizing construction equipment traffic near the top of the river bank during demolition. SLOPE MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS As the river bank has been subjected to and continues to experience erosion from river flow which has reduced slope stability over time, we recommend the condition of the slope be monitored. We recommend the owner examine the slope at a minimum on an annual basis for indications of reduced stability such as 1) exposed soil on the river bank; or 2) significant Toss of ground; or 3) tension cracks developing on the slope or on upland portions of the site. If these conditions are apparent, we recommend AGRA be contacted immediately to observe slope conditions so that appropriate slope stabilization measures can be developed and implemented. CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report or any aspects of the project, please feel free to contact our office. �yt;Jlti A. wAsttif ames S. Dra Principal JSD /SAS /Iad Distribution: The Northwestern Trust (2) Attn: Mr. David Williams [EXPIRES /u/(o7Z090 Stephen A. Siebert, P.E. Senior Project Engineer David Kehle Architect (1) Attn: Mr. David Kehle \ \Kirkland_main\VOL1 \SHARED \WORDPROC \99 Projects \Seattle \08000s \08219 Northwestern Trust \Skagen Marine Riverbank Impacts Ltr.wpd AGRA /0/i4igoi ENGINEERING GLOBAL SOLUTIONS z -z. JU. 0 co w J m' H w w O' J' u- <. a` I-w Z: z� zo uj 0-. ww.. O; uiz' O 1- z ��? =', ti` ri=' �? ���..' �.„, ��0�'' iS'° ravg�tir*° r�i:���'�t'"R?�xi�;iy1•,,"''i', ri: a '�c �,'�." °.`"g.�' "' "•:e�?[ fig, ;f•" 1 y1; . .e '!� +1 - r.;+-trYv g4a;J r- ;17;5.,. yx , e �,. �''' $ >: t;4 'D't wVY�" cx ij'�y „a�. �.. � w'3..:"JP� 'rC�{�ir wp•,�';..1...,u�. .�""`� ,City of . Tukwila ) 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 1908 MEMORANDUA--... • Z H W Ce 6 J U; U 0' N 0 W =. 0 co DI zd ZO0, 2 p` U N: O 1-; W, = U Z" N. 01- Z .. G� :L7 r -ca,1� �ay,yM�.-(^.T.- 7 � ,:40 iAg Y74. .'Ay7' `L {�. 0x'm. ni-' - Tea,?eze, iris: i;xi, zw∎ Tncic"U"t <i'Z;s.7'a- ;55:s- ”,-',, : V;V- il, i:4 �r �3,..ta•, -W w� �iq �1 ["�•�vY� f r� 1 { YV' Wi' �e li•`l73'�V'fi� � 4r.�.R.;yi`:h..'c{..;. 2M.. lwii.wr Cite of Tukwila .:7,7 5. Yyi h' \�r.'.,.M..r:.ka'S' ([1t \r ,01.. 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) ,. / .... .... 0 rki 433 -1800 MEMORANDUM TO: 6% > «L / FROM: v a' L _!. , DATE 2 MT9 SUBJECT: -C a, % /rt G?' l7 .Oi . I/ II 0 14 I41%i i /.4'- Vg. /0l w ' -- /A/9 144 f.'f- , e i a. . • ..1/k, r (' v _4 ' -i :'G?, (t p h' 1/ ha, /t l; a.1 17'' PL. Gl,l k/c_. 41./ 1/,9 7 -e/di ��` / ) ro !/ ,1,, /.y /mil )- �. %�-- , 47.4(/ .:i�Cp_( fr7, (;/ ( i & i . ' /Iv ., /14-66- - - 7 - , .,p 17'' - . Av/ / Z W • 00 co v) W; =. J � W 2 g J: LL.Q ZH :Z F- Lula W' u. W Z' ,ad O PillIl O• ■ david ke:e September 23, 1999 City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Ms. Alexa Berlow Re: Skaggen Marine SERA #E99 -0004 Shoreline #L99 -0009 Dear Alexa, RECEIVED SEP 2 3 '1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I had wanted to meet with you and Public.Works to review the scope of services from AGRA and B- twelve (Biologist) to insure that we have not gone overboard on the studies.while providing the required information the city needs to approve our demolition project. Your reluctance to meet without a project proposal to discuss doesn't seem to help make sure the final proposal submitted will address your concems. I have attached the AGRA proposal and B- twelve proposal for your review of their scope. I am concerned with the B- Twelve proposal, that they have proposed more work than is necessary. One of the Owners, Kathy, is saying that all we need to do is fill in some paperwork, an extremely simple, not costly process. It is hard to convince the Owner's to spend $5,000 for a "simple process ". Please contact me upon your review of the scopes of proposals. David Kehle DK/mt Enclosure: AGRA and B- twelve proposals cc: Diane Decker a1973711et9- 23bIdg. 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 SEATTLE, WA 98163 z (206) 433 -8997 FAX (206) 246 -8369 .Z tr W: UO_ f/) 0' 'CO w =: wo Q: a. • :t -.t • z� • .o� ;w • � U lL• Z' • o F"` • z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS September 15, 1999 TO: Brenda Holt Permit Coordinator FR: Alexa Berlow Associate Planner RE: Skagen Marine D99 -0324 This project is currently under shoreline substantive review (L99- 0048). This proposal shows plans to build a 10X10 patio, to be attached to the outside of the building, within the shoreline setback. Therefore, this proposal can not be approved until the shoreline substantial development permit has been approved. This proposal should be revised to include interior work only: If the applicant still choose to build the patio, then it should be included as part of the shoreline permit. 6300 Southcenter Boulevarah Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 ..z a'' w • 2 .J Vi U O V) 0; 'CO w =, w a: =d. • Ilk _ Z 1- o z� w, w; N_ ri .wu • Z. • O.. September 14, 1999 .Mr. David Kehle, Kehle 'Architects • 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 • Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Skagen Marine Dear David, ••B- twelve Associates LInc. 1103 W. Meeker St. Suite C Kent, WA 98032 -5751 • (v) 253-859-0515 (f) 253- 852 -4732 (e) bl2assoc @compuserve.com Thank you for your request for a proposal for biological services at the proposed Skagen ' Marine project site in Tukwila. W..e understand that the project will involve demolition of one building on the site, re- paving the old building site as a parking lot, and remodel of • the remaining building without expansion of the structure. • We also understand that the remodel project will include redirection of the site storm water away from the river and into the city storm drainage system in Pacific Hwy. South. Therefore, we understand that the project will not increase the amount of impervious surface at the site and that project storm water will not discharge to the river. We also understand that the client does not wish to commit to a bank stabilization or- erosion control program as part of their project. Our fee estimate is based on the assumption that the Stream Bank Vegetation Enhancement Plan will meet the requirements of the City of Tukwila and other agencies that might be involved in reviewing this project. • Due to the limited scope of the proposed project, we have assumed that existing information and documentation for the Duwamish River fisheries and habitat will be adequate to address the existing habitat issues for the Biologic Assessment. Our fee does not include original investigation of the river, its cross - sections, profile, habitat features or aquatic species. if required, this information can be provided under a separate agreement. We look forward to working with Skagen Marine and you on this project. Please call me if we can answer any questions or provide additional information. . Sincerely, B- twelve Associates, Inc. Susan L. Bt fgemeister President Enc. RECEIVED SEP 2 3 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B- twelve Associates' Inc• -1103 W. Meeker St.: Suite C (f) 253 -852 -4732 Kent, WA 98032 -5751 (e) bl2assoc @compuserve.coin (v) 253-859-0515 • PROJECT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on September 14, 1999 by B- TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. (B- twelve), 1103 West Meeker, Suite C, Kent, WA 98032,'(Phone'253- 859=0515) and Skagen Marine . 10625 E. Marginal Way Tukwila, WA • Agent: David Kehle. Architect. . Phone: 206 - 433 -8997 • Project Name: Skagen Marine Jurisdiction: Tukwila Location: Pacific Hwy South at Boeing Access Road For this Agreement, project boundaries are identified by the Client based on: x_ survey: 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES: ' 1.1 STREAM BANK VEGETATION ENHANCEMENT PLAN 1.1.1 Conduct one site visit to determine approximate location of native non- invasive vegetation along the stream bank that will be saved as part of the Enhancement Plan. Preservation of this vegetation will be included in the overall plan. Locations of vegetation are expected to be approximate. New plants will be . field adjusted to the existing location of the preserved shrubs and trees. 1.1.2. Attend one meeting with the client or client's agent to review agency requirements and site design considerations ' 1.1.3 Prepare a Final Plan for Stream Bank Vegetation Enhancement in accordance with agency guidelines. No direct impacts to the stream bank are proposed and the project does not include a stream bank stabilization ;plan. Attachment A lists base information that may be required by the reviewing. • agency(ies) for final plan review. This base information will be supplied to B- twelve Associates by the client, per agency requirement, and is not included in this Agreement. 1.1.4 The enhancement plan will be prepared for the enhancement area using the final engineering plan as the base map. The plan will show specific plant locations and groupings. Text included on the plan will discuss the plant materials, location, and planting techniques as well as timing of installation; fertilization, etc. The plan will include a monitoring program, standards of success and a contingency plan. 1.1.5 Prepare an estimate of the cost of materials, installation and monitoring for client's use in obtaining the mitigation bond. 1.1.6 Meet with client or client's agent to review proposed mitigation plan prior to submittal to the agency(ies). RECEIVED SEP 2 3 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: Skagen Marine . B- twelve Associates' September 14, 1999 • Page 2/5 1.1.7 Attend one meeting with agency environmental planner, surface water design review staff and other agency personnel, as requested to review the proposed enhancement plan: 1.1.8 Redesign of the project by the client resulting in revisions to the enhancement plan after initial approval by the client will be performed as an Extra Service to this Agreement. • 1.2 BIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT Prepare'a biologic assessment report that will address the impacts, of the proposed remodel project on the existing stream channel habitat adjacent to the Skagen Marine. project site. The Vegetation Enhancement plan will be included in the biologic assessment as mitigation for the identified impacts. • The fee for preparation of the biologic assessment for the project assumes the following: • • No grading, bank stabilization structures, or facilities will.be placed within the ordinary high water of the stream of within the channel bank. . : • • • Stream bunt enhancement will be:limited to vegetation installation using normal planting techniques. No bio- engineering of the stream'channel or bank is proposed. • No analysis of stream or channel cross - section, profile, or channel stability is required. All discussion of fisheries use of the Duwamish River will be based on available documentation; no new information will be generated.: • • • • • • Determination of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Duwamish River will be provided . • by others.. 2.0 PAYMENT 2.1 All work will be billed on an hourly basis according to the standard hourly rates in effect at the time the work is performed, plus expenses. Fees identified below are estimates and do not imply a "not to exceed" fee. 2.1.1 Estimated Fees: . 1.1 STREAM BANK VEGETATION ENHANCEMENT PLAN $2300.00 - $2500.00 1.2 BIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT REPORT • • $1900.00 - $2300.00 ESTIMATED PROJECT FEE: Hourly Plus Expenses • $4200.00 - $4800.00 ESTIMATED EXPENSES: printing, photocopying, film, $40.00 2.2 The attached cover letter dated September 14, 1999 is considered part of this contract. •2.3 Payment is due with monthly progress invoices. Retainer, if any, will be applied to first invoice. All payments shall be due on receipt of invoice. A late payment fee of 15% per annum will be charged on the balance more than 30 days past due calculated from the date of invoice.. 2.4 This Project Agreement is with the client: payment is not dependent upon fee payment by others or other financial agreements between the client and another party. 2.5 In the event that the client suspends or terminates work prior to completion of this agreement, client shall pay B- twelve for work performed through the date of written notification of suspension or termination of work at the standard hourly rates in effect at the time the work was performed. 2.6 If the Client does not provide payment for services in 90 days, B- twelve Associates, Inc. will be forced to take legal action. Client will reimburse B- twelve Associates, Inc. for any legal expenses procured in the collection of monies past due. Z • Z. re W J0 O 0: • 0; �) w W =; (—; w O w '. 5 u_ Q` = d, w Z Off. 2p, ra WW. O;. U- 1.11 2 V =, O I- z RE: Skagen Marine B- twelve Associates September 14;1999 . Page 3/5 3.0 EXTRA SERVICES 3.1 Services that will be performed on an hourly basis include: • _ * Additional meetings with agency or with client, including on -site meetings to discuss findings, methodology or approach to project design beyond the initial review with client or agent.: • * Revision of the report due to client's alteration of scope of work. * Additional work as required by client and not covered under separate contract. ` * B- twelve is available for additional services including: coordination with client or client's agent, regarding site design: coordination with the COE to determine development feasibility: ' . • preparation of permits, mitigation plans or other wetland related services. 4.0 ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS 4.1 The Client is responsible for providing B- twelve Associates, Inc. a description of the' property, its locations, and site conditions which could impact our work. The Client also must advise B- twelve Associates, Inc. of the location and nature of any known or suspected hazards that may exist on the • property. The Client must advise B- twelve Associates, Inc., prior to commencement of our work, of any special requirements for site entry or any other required permissions. If the property is not owned by the `Client, the Client will obtain permission for right -of -entry for the purpose of accomplishing our services. B- twelve Associates, Inc. will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the property. In the' normal course of exploratory work some surface or vegetation disruption may occur. Restoration of the site is not part of this agreement, unless specifically indicated in the scope of services for our work. :' 4.2 B- twelve does not guarantee approval of the enhancement plan by any governmental agency. Enhancement design standards have not been adopted by the reviewing agency (ies); therefore enhancement design plans are developed in accordance with the information and agency policies as they are available at the time of the design. Individual agency plan reviewers may apply personal standards for approval over which B- twelve has no control. - • 4.3 The Client shall indemnify and hold harmless B- twelve Associates, Inc. and its officers, directors, employees, and subcontractors from and against all claims and actions, including reasonable attorney's fees, based on or arising out of damages or injuries to persons or property caused by error, omission,.or negligent act of the Client or any of its agents, subcontractors, and employees in the performance of services hereunder, subject to any limitations, other indemnifications, or other provisions to which the client and B- twelve Associates, Inc. have agreed. 4.4 Neither party shall be responsible or be held liable to the other for consequential damages, including but not limited to loss of profit, loss of investment, loss of product, or business interruption. The liability of B- twelve Associates, Inc. to the Client shall be limited to B- twelve's fee or to $50,000, whichever is less. 4.5 B- twelve will not provide services with regard to the detection, removal, or disposal of hazardous substances. The Owner shall have the sole responsibility for investigating the existence and location of hazardous substances at the project site and will furnish all tests, inspections, reports, warnings, notices, or postings required by law regarding hazardous substances. 4.6 There are no other understandings or agreements between Client and B- twelve except as herein expressly stated. . B- TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. h��,L��� SUSAN L. BL GEMEISTER SKAGEN MARINE President DATE: Z • Z cc 21" 6 0 00. CO U W. W =; J W O. LL ?, d. Lu Z Z O LU 0 H: W W = U' r_ 0:. li.Z P =i • 0~ Z STREAM BANK ENHANCEMENT PLAN • Supplemental information to be supplied to B- twelve Associates • Surveyor . • Boundary survey of mitigation area • Topography of stream mitigation area, including buffers, at 1 -foot contour intervals.' Surveyed top of bank or location of ordinary high water mark (OHW) of stream(s), including data points and numbers. • . ' • ' ' 4. Surveyed locations of all trees 18" dbh within mitigation area ` 5. • Calculated area of impacts to stream buffer; 6.. . Base map with 1 -foot contour intervals at scale of 1" = 20' Engineer 1.. • All impacts to the stream buffer area including grading, storm water 'facilities and • discharge, retaining•walls, service roads, driveways, signs, easements, and utilities. 2. 100 -year flood elevation of stream' • . 3. .. Coordination of design for storm water discharge to stream 4. Coordination with B-twelye to develop 'final grading plan and storm drainage plan to • • achieve mitigation goals for stream bank areas. • 5. Erosion control plan (temporary and permanent) adjacent to both the mitigation area, 6. . ' - • • C. Geotechnical Engineer • 1. Soil logs in stream buffer mitigation areas .. 2. . Discussion of groundwater in stream buffer mitigation areas . 3. Discussion of soils stream buffer mitigation areas. ..RE:. Skagen Marine B- twelve Associates September 14, 1999 Page 4/5 D. Owner /Client 1. Proof of ownership of mitigation area. 2. Bond for installation and monitoring 3. Recorded notice on title of sensitive areas. File: Share/ SKAGEN - KEHLE.doc AGRA CNG INC CRING GI.OVALSOLUTIONS September 10, 1999 91P-13356-0 Northwestern Trust 1201 Third Avenue, 20th Floor Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. David Williams Subject: Proposal for Geotechnical and Environmental Services Former Skagen Marine Facility Seattle, Washington Dear Mr, Williams: AGRA Earth i Envtruntnnird, Inc. 11335 NH 122nd Way 9ulta 100 I vk nd, Wathington USA §$034401a Tel (426) 8204809 Fax (425) 821.3914 RECEIVED SEP 2 3 1999. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT As requested by David Kehle Architect, AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (AGRA) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide geotechnical and environmental services. The primary purpose of our work would be to address recent environmental concems by the City of Tukwila outlined in a letter dated August 5, 1999 from Ms. Alexa Berlow. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is the former Skagen Marine facility located at 10625 -29 E. Marginal Way in Seattle, Washington. This site consists of an irregularly shaped parcel that measures about 370 by 135 feet overall and encompasses approximately one acre. Site boundaries are generally delineated by an undeveloped properly to the north, by a commercial development to the south, by the Duwamish River on the west, and by the intersection of E. Marginal Way and 'Pacific Highway S. on the east. Currently, the following three unoccupied buildings exist at the site: (1) a one -story L- shaped, wood - framed building (the main Skagen Marine Building); (2) a rectangular shaped Butler building; and (3) a small wood framed structure adjacent to the north end of the main building. The bank of the Duwamish River is heavily vegetated with blackberry bushes. Previous development plans included remodeling the main Skagen Marine building, which is in disrepair and has experienced significant differential settlements, demolishing the small adjacent wooden structure, and constructing a rock revetment along the shoreline of the Duwamish River to prevent further shoreline degradation and improve existing slope stability. Current development plans include demolishing the main Skagen building and adjacent wooden structure, remodeling the existing Butler building and improving the stability of the existing slope due to prohibitive costs, The area of the main Skagen building will be asphalt paved and used as S. IWOMOPROC %PROPOSAL11aCWs11335b -o NOTthwesITrus1Vormer 3 i1 Mxiw FSNty.wpd 2 /Z m: 6922 9tZ GNV 1-1.I.2IV2 not': Nd6C: 66 -01 -6 :)2 1:�5 z f- z. 10 00 w o. w 111 1 I_. w0 t_ a. id �w z F; z ►- LU U O- w— LL f w zi z Northwestern Trust 91P -13356 September 9, 1999 Page 2 a storage area. We understand that to mitigate further river bank erosion that the bank will be vegetated with willow stakes above the high water mark to the top of the bank. SCOPE OF WORK We have prepared our scope of work to address the following items identified by the City of Tukwila: 1. Update existing environmental documents considering the latest proposed development. 2. Provide a sampling and testing plan of the soils once the building is removed or following demolition to evaluate potential contaminants beneath the existing floor slab. 3. Provide a river stabilization analysis to show how/if the building demolition will impact the riverbank. Environmental Services AGRA would address Item 1 by reviewing the previous environmental studies. AGRA would assess whether the previous Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments are still applicable to present site conditions and determine whether updated Information is necessary. Item 2 can be completed prior to/or after demolition of the building. If we complete our work prior to demolition, the cost would be higher. It may be prudent to complete the work now rather than • later to expedite the permit process. Our work would involve either drilling holes inside the building through the floor slab or excavating test pits after demolition once the slab is removed. If we complete our work prior to demolition, we would propose advancing a minimum of five shallow boring explorations (less than 10 feet) beneath the floor slab. Soil samples would be collected continuously and screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a portable photoionization detector (PID). Based on the previous environmental testing, no concentrations of VOCs, semivolatiles, or petroleum hydrocarbons had been detected in site soils, AGRA would not analyze soil samples for these contaminants unless field screening results indicate it would be prudent. AGRA would analyze one soil sample per exploration for priority pollutant metals, which were identified during the previous groundwater sampling in 1992. The results of the investigation would be presented in a brief summary report. Geotechnical Services Based on our recent meeting with the City, it appears that item 3 is not warranted for the site since demolition of the existing building, in our opinion, will not affect the existing river bank provided appropriate demolition /construction practices are utilized. We propose to prepare a brief letter that presents our professional opinion with regard to this and also provide recommendations for slope monitoring program during and after site development. w ORD ?R0CWROP03RL11 300:12%133.55-o Nortrwea4 TrusnFoemr Slug M' F dty.wod r0 g /E M! 6909 9tZ 9O - 2lIA,t3 cNV RL31V VOV! 11idOf :' ! 6G -01 -6 *AGRA eNr,Nr( ,,W u.cm spiuncwy INGS z 1 1._w re U O; rn w= J F-; w O. gQ I t— z �. I- O zr- , U• � O — 0 H w w' H U;. z. w co O z Northwestern Trust September 9, 1999 91P -13356 Page 3 COST AND SCHEDULE AGRA services will be performed on a time - and - expenses basis according to our current Schedule of Charges and General Conditions, a copy of which is attached. If adverse conditions arise during our evaluation, we will Inform you as soon as possible and will perform no work beyond the authorized scope without your approval: Environmental Services . Option A — Prior to Demolition Drilling Services (subcontracted, includes concrete coring, tax, and AGRA's 12% subcontractor handling fee, and $50 /per hole Ecology permitting fee) 82,200 Field Services (Includes one day labor, equipment, supplies, & travel) 900 Analytical Laboratory (includes 5 soils for priority pollutant metals, 10 -day turnaround, @ $190 /sample plus 12% subcontractor handling fee) 1 100 Reporting and Project Management 1,600 Review of Previous Environmental Studies 450 TOTAL $6,250 Option B — Following Demolition Same as Option A without drilling services, assuming backhoe is provided by owner TOTAL $4,060 Geotechnical Services Meeting with City of Tukwila $300 Letter Preparation TOTAL $800 We anticipate that the environmental scope of work could be completed within three weeks of authorization, based on the standard laboratory turnaround of ten working days for priority pollutant metals analysis, Additional surcharges would apply if a faster tumaround is requested. Our geotechnical scope could be completed within a week. SAINOROPROCTROP09AL112000ri1? Si-p tkaewn 1 Tn:A,ifomwr Skagen Mein Fedlily.wpd liatirmaCtimatretnammosaweekonnetematea AGRA E'IG�NEEAIXG GIUU +I 1.7L rICX1 z W; 2, CJ) 0- rn W I • w o: u_Q •= a. • I.-w t— O' z t- w :w . U� :w ut; V ii z Oh . z Northwestern Trust September 9, 1999 91P -13356 Page 4 CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal, and we look forward to serving your geotechnical and environmental needs. For your convenience, we have submitted two copies of this proposal letter. Our services can be authorized by having an appropriate representative sign and retum one copy to us. Alternatively, you may append one copy to your standard subconsultant agreement or purchase order, Please understand that the authorizing organization assumes ultimate responsibility for payment of our services. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call, Initial one: if Option A (Prior to Demolition) Option B (After Demolition) Sincerely, AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. Ste • - . Siebert, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Authorized by, Organization 4/ Signature and Date wo 6-hie ) .464,01)f Name and Title Senl e r Env ronmental Geologist SASIJKljdp Enclosures: 9999 Schedule of Charges and General Conditions Distribution: Northwestern Trust (2) Attn: Mr. David Williams David Kehle Architect (1) Attn: Mr. David Kehle SAWORDPROC %PROPCSAL1110C0e41370.p NortRweet r Fcnnar Skagen Marino Facilly.Mpd 'Y6` , '�' .'. 44 V 7..: v. •l s4*I ....& .i ' WJTf"f. (W —nT_r. 61_Z3111\ AGRA ,n OIN ! P GLOUL S( UflQ i z 1 ,1.- w cc 2 v0: cnw: w =, U) w w 0- tea' u =; zd 1- al S: Z 1-; zo UJ N' w;. 0 Z' ui tn` O H: exa Ber ow - S aggen Marine From: Carol Lumb To: Alexa Berlow Date: 9/7/99 1:54PM Subject: Skaggen Marine FYI: Skaggen Marine submitted a building permit (D99 -0324) to add a bathroom, repaint the exterior siding, install electrical service, and clean up the existing facility. I talked to Dave Kehle and evidently this is a different project from the demo that they have submitted that you are working on. I looked over what was submitted and determined that it was complete and then asked that it be routed to you for more detailed review so you can coordinate this with whatever is happening with the demo. Thanks! Pagel R z = H` 1— Z ` o: W- 6 ;U 0 'An C3 u)w w =H J 2 g a; .C12 a w z�. `-o z iO N F- V 11. Z z. rpl'tl " • • $J �i . .r. • TO. FROM. DATE. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) - MEMORANDUM 12 a. Lars l)-( etc 2 Y SUBJECT. S lts e vm . 1-1c, u c Car-,1 � a .c� L0 ve � �� D Jit) U P A 04-C__CS2. '(-7/V- 'IeN_Q Ckf2Arr b- vvW % wi Q 11� c'i�, . C�Go�v R"S 1) - fx L) 1CAAJ 1 Lrl a.., 1 c 6 ov. 4e\f) PAW . v\r -bUt - rtt,t at la :.1-2e_ adddllzs " GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT FORMER SKAGEN MARINE FACILITY 10625-29 EAST MARGINAL WAY SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Submitted to: Northwestern .Trust 1201 Third Avenue 20th Floor Seattle, Washington 98101 Submitted by: AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. 11335 N.E. 122nd Way, Suite 100 Kirkland, Washington 98034-6918 rn v cop R 6cin 26 February 1998 8-91M-08219-C Lc:19,-0009 , I °) RECEIVED SEP 02 1999 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS AGRA Earth•& Environmental ENGINEERING.GLOBAL SOLUTIONS .t ' exa :erow - e: request for in f Page ! From: Vernon Umetsu To: Alexa Berlow Date: 9/2/99 4:24PM Subject: Fwd: Re: request for information The closest permit I can find is L95-0032 Turning Basin 3 habitat restoration (which included a derelict ferry removal). I recall a Muckleshoot habitat enhancement project which included Kenco pier removal and was stalled for a biological assessment due to Endangered Species, but couldn't find anything. vern >>> Alexa Berlow 09/02/99 11:48AM >>> vernon, i'm looking for examples of demolition projects subject to shoreline. gary s. through kenco marine might apply, and said i should check with you. it doesn't come up in sierra. what do you know about it and would it apply? -alexa. exa = er ow - - e: request for in ormat (' From: Gary Schulz To: Alexa Berlow Date: 9/2/99 9:31 AM Subject: Re: request for information Alexa, A fairly recent project was the Port of Seattle mitigation site - "Kenco Marine" just north of 102nd near the Turning Basin. Check with Vernon. gary »> Alexa Berlow 09/01/99 01:37PM >» i am searching for examples of demolition projects that have been subject to a shoreline substantial development permit. Do you have any suggestions? at ryan 'arson's suggestion, i am also requesting info from brian shelton. thanks.: -alexa. Z • • w 6 Jo 1.) 0; CO 0> w w' uo. = C7 • moCI. • •w W . l. Z` O7 z. L99 -0063: WSDOT I -405 Tent, .,rary Noise Variance Page 3 ♦ Homestead Village (motel) 500 feet from the bridge repair sites and ♦ Family Fun Center (amusement park) is open 9 a.m. to midnight, 7 days per week. DECISION CRITERIA A "temporary noise variance" may be issued by the D.C.D. Director, acting as the "administrator," pursuant to TMC 8.22.180(B): "...at the reasonable discretion of the administrator." The criteria to grant or deny a temporary noise variance is shown in bold and followed by staff discussion. 1. No variance shall be granted pursuant to this chapter until the administrator has considered the relative interests of the applicant, other owners or possessors or (sic) property likely to be affected by the noise, and the general public. (TMC 8.22.180(C)) Noise Standards a. Construction noise is exempt from regulation except between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. During those times, the proposed freeway construction noise impacts on residential receiving districts is limited to 50 dB(A) per TMC 8.22.050(1)5. Maximum impacts on commercial districts is 65 dB(A) (ibid.). b. "No sound source specifically exempted from a maximum permissible sound level by this chapter shall be a public nuisance noise or public disturbance noise..." (TMC 18.22.140). This applies to the proposed freeway construction during non- regulated hours. Noise Impacts c. EPA thresholds of acceptable noise were recognized and incorporated into the "Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement" (October, 1995:pg.47) as follows: 55 or less Levels are generally acceptable; no noise impact is generally associated with these levels. 55 -65 dB(A) Adverse noise impacts exist; this measurement represents the lowest level possible without adverse significant impact. 65 -70 dB(A) Significant noise impacts exist; allowable only in unusual cases where lower levels are not possible. 5This assumes that the freeway is an "industrial" "District of Sound Source." A commercial district is limited to 47 dB(A) while a residential source is limited to 45 dB(A) (TMC 8.22.150(1)). No other adjustments per 8.22.150(2) or (3) seem to be appropriate. Q: \99 \wsdtvar bridge \stfrpt.doc ' 1908 1. 71' *:111r47.4"4...4.711V1.A1,,,7 i4Ar +ea: Mir :L*P"TVVals,"M'A Mrrr,nt e City of Tu,kwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 MEMORANDUM Lck L&,-\ V S FROM 1)-( e x e-. DATE: CP '1-5)". iq . SUBJECT: S Osev-, rl ay Cory- cAb N. -e.1,, i Li\ V V.0 1,--t' irA C-L., 7, Tf- 'k rA ,-.) 2,90,y, u -Dr-A oc_J-( --r,-',0 0( 0 irrtriKcA.,-1 vYL4-6, ----.9 ()tr.-niv lie,,ipc7)k . 11 (04 (An) 101/10R) i c Wir\OVI rt -4eNs) ..)V11 Vv-7 it Q oi 17) 17p _6(c4dukm 71'-`a,101C AfAn(c4...- Jo City of Tukwila Department of Community Development September 2, 1999 Cathy Ross 15851 SE 16tH Bellevue, WA 98008 Re: Skagen Marine (L99 -0009, E99 -0004) Dear Cathy Ross: John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director z re al 6 J U, UO' CO u,w ILI J E=-, U) OLL .uj g Q .. co a'. = w' z� z o At your request, enclosed is a copy of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, prepared v by ATEC December 31, 1991. This report was submitted for both the SEPA checklist and ;O -(9-: the shoreline substantial development permit (File # E99 -0004 and L99- 0009). Items in 'o the 1991 report that apply to the demolition proposal were outlined on June 5, 1999, in a = twi letter from David Kehle to me, planner -in- charge of the project. However, the report u. does not respond to the extent of shoreline issues brought about during the substantive iii z; co review phase. v O Also at your request, I am searching for examples of other demolition projects subject to shoreline development permits to assist you in this phase of the revision process. In the meantime, Ryan Larson in Public Works is prepared to assist you answer the additional questions you have about the public works comments for the shoreline permit, outlined in my letter to David Kehle dated August 5, 1999. Please let me know in advance when you would like to•do this so that I can set aside time in our schedules to meet or to have a conference call with you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I am here to assist you through the permit process, to provide whatever information about the project you need to meet the city requirements for the permit proposal. However, please be aware of a policy in our office that instructs us to work through a single contact person designated to the project. Should you or any other member of your project team wish to do so, a contact person can be redesignated. Just have one of your team members notify me of the new person's name, address, and telephone number. It can be handles over the telephone. Otherwise, it is important for the designated contact person to be kept in the loop on activity pertaining to the project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 •^' '°"^' ��. �' Alexa Berlow Associate Planner O Letter to Cathy Ross Skagen Marine Page 2 2 ifr ki4.ce r1060 FM 1. 01A ) 3 Roc )*(194;-3)-1) -Ica& 001 0161) (c--) 3qat. 0009 . ir sV'G 'S Nit] UF Sb) is -Flc� was dere, by �% r�F �(��°� 0Z--c- 9T. got is U /ei re7 /c'c-4 !'li& prop054V, Iwo-) 8/o/. z W • JU .U0: • W = uj J I— J' co d • = W •z m' • z� Ill a ,D•0'; oN p H 'WILE • U N' • o• Z.. City of Tukwila Pt.LL John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director August5, 1999 David Kehle David Kehle Architect 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Skagen Marine L99 -0009 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Dear David Kehle: This letter is to follow up on our telephone. conversation Tuesday August 3, 1999 regarding comments to the Skagen Marine shoreline substantial development proposal submitted last January 1999 to demolish the building at the north end of the site. The revisions you submitted on June 14, 1999 bring the environmental concerns for the current proposal up to date since your last permit. The current shoreline proposal triggers additional environmental concerns. Some of the issues will require that you prepare, or hire a consultant to prepare, new studies while other issues will only necessitate that you bring the specified environmental document up to date to reflect the new proposal. The environmental concerns for your most current shoreline permit include the following: Update existing environmental documents (Geotechnical and Environmental Site assessment prepared by RZA AGRA, Inc. October 13, 1992 and the Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) prepared by ATEC December 31, 1991), including the soil report to reflect the 1998 proposal. On the soil report, also include provisions for how you propose to test the soil once the building is removed, unless this data can be gathered prior to demolition. • Provide a biological assessment of impacts the demolition might have on the river environment, to assure the protection of salmon habitats. This information will be submitted to NYMFS as part of the Shoreline permit notification procedure. • The following sources of information must be updated to reflect the most recent shoreline permit proposal: the Entranco survey must be updated, the NGV datum must be verified, and the benchmarks must be FEMA approved. • Under the Flood Zone Control Permit, you will need to provide a river stabilization analysis. to show how /if the demolition will impact the riverbank. When preparing this analysis, please check that the proper water elevations are used. A copy of city and county river stabilization „, 6300 Southcenter Boulevarc4 Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 z NN" Wc • JV '0 O N0. 'W =: J W w �: ga 5 u.a co D .z� F- O` z CI: ori O f—.. wW. 1-U tjZ' • •z Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (L99 -0009) Skagen Marine Page 2 guidelines can be referenced through our department. Unfortunately, the guidelines are not for distribution but you can make an appointment to reference these materials at the Permit Center, located in the City Hall annex, in Suite 100 of the Minolta Building. Please call me at (206) 431 -3673 to set up a time. • You will need to outline a maintenance plan for landscaping in the shoreline environment, and measures you, as the private property owner, will take to assure that there are no impacts to the riverbank once the shoreline permit is issued. There are a couple of sample maintenance plans for previous projects that you can look through here in our office. Project files can not be taken from the office, so please call me to set up a time to look through them should you feel that this would be useful to you. As I mentioned in our telephone conversation, some of the items requested during this revision phase are to meet concerns that might be brought forth by any one of a number of government agencies, and/or Indian tribes, during the revision and appeal phases of the permit process. The City of Tukwila acts as the lead agency for shoreline permits submitted in our jurisdiction and we arerequired to notify federal, state, and county agencies about your permit proposal. Therefore, to most successfully meet the requirements of this revision phase, I would suggest you take the position that you are, in general terms, "a-property owner in the shoreline environment who is responsibly attending to any and all possible infringements your proposal may have on the shoreline environment and riverbank ", during the demolition and in the future. Some of these issues may be complex and time consuming. Please review the requested items carefully against your proposal, and call me as soon as possible with any questions. I would like to assist you in making this revision phase run as efficiently and expeditiously as possible. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Cc: Joanna Spencer, Public Works Department City Reviewing Departments z z • -..I C.) U O; co :(/) 111:1 • w =: w• O w Q CJ: w, :z I— 0: ZI- ILL w. 10tH; = w° :1— U. ~O• w z: :O z t. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 DATE: Co-14-6M ' PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: L q oo PROJECT NAME: 6k-16.1-43 /ka,v-IM) PROJECT ADDRESS: / OLP A Ea6t &gird- It)14.1 CONTACT PERSON: L l 64, y13 PHONE: 49)010 - LA:6 _- ' 'l 7 REVISION SUMMARY: ak 'k aAr e — 6Gc rk p Pu ntp Otti ,C'oc uir►aOE v (-qeo -Mill iL 4- Er'v iron 1yj merited 5d /4-66 65Iy'I -- 1---e- r 4o • Ii -egic. , Cot HECEIVED CI`rY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 k 1999 PERMIT CENTER SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: • 4Li-L ) ......,-»... �: �+ .�. 3/19/96 z • W. 0 0` N0. W =. J W0 g X a: I-_ Z �. Z Q;. 111 uji U0 ON 0 UJ H 0: 3;. ,z F. O ~• z david kel June 14, 1999 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Ms. Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Re: Skaggen Marine SEPA/Shoreline Dear Alexa, Since your letter of May 12, 1999 the Owners have been doing research into what has transpired regarding the notations in the Environmental Site Assessment from RZA AGRA in July 1992 (W -8219) and Phase I by ATEC dated December 31, 1991. In the latter report, I will address each item that was underlined. A. Item 2.4: Asbestos Containing Materials Suspected items were suspended ceilings, and flooring. RZA AGRA with Asbestos Analysis and Information, Inc. tested various sample materials. Per the RZA report dated July 1992 (VV- 8219), ceiling material was collected and material was below limits (pg. 2). In addition the asbestos company report (May 26th), ceiling test was done and also the floor tile was noted as not detectable. As I visually observed, no ceiling tiles now exist nor is there any flooring. B. Item 2.5: Utilities There does not appear to be signs of an existing septic tank. The building is being demolished and this would be of no significance. C. Solid and Hazardous Waste: In the RZA July report, soil samples were taken; ground water was collected and tested by the asbestos - testing lab with no recommendations to do anything else. The building is vacant and no signs of solvents, paints, etc. are on site now. 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433 -8997 SEATTLE, WA 98168 FAX (206) 246 -8369 00 to p III =; 1.-; 0; 2 g Q mow, � o z al w;. moo; • 10 NI WW, 'II=- V Vio. v co, 0 z Ms. Alexa Berlow City of Tukwila Re: Skaggen Marine June 14, 1999 Page 2 D. The sump pump was discussed in the RZA October 12, 1992 report with the follow - up report of October 13, 1992 all indicated the fluid was non - hazardous and the only issue is a wooden cover. Since the proposal is to demolish the building, this pump will be removed entirely. In terms of your notes on a previous SEPA, I suggest you use our permit application. To quickly answer the comments, bank stabilization will not be done and is why we are demolishing the building; no surface water withdrawals or diversions will occur with the demolition; any floor plan would be below top of bank which is where our work is; no waste materials are discharged to surface waters when the building is demolished. Please review the attached information along with my letter and focus on our project proposal. I trust this will answer your questions and will now re -start the project review. Sincerely, oc David Kehte DK/mt cc: Diane Decker Enclosure: RZA Reports a:\9737\Iet6- 14.doc • z•. • �- W; W w =: w O Ji • • :=a• • mow; I o' `w w. 0 1_. • • •W = V:' _ z+ City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director April 16, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION David Kehle, Architect 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Skagen Marine 10625 East Marginal Way E99-0004 (SEPA Application Checklist) L99-0009 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) Dear Mr. Kehle: Your application for review of a State Environmental Protection Review (SEPA) Checklist and Shoreline Substantial development Permit to demolish an existing one story office/showroom and shop building (approximately 7,000 sq. ft); upgrade and repair an existing shop located at 10625 East Marginal Way, are considered complete as of February 24, 1999. The next step is for you to attach a laminated Notice of Application form on your notice board for the Shoreline Substantial Development. The notice for the SEPA will be installed once the final determination on the checklist has been made. Laminated notices for all permit activity associated with this project are to be posted on the notice board. For instructions and timelines to install a notice board on the site, please refer to Attachment B - Public Information Signs in the application packet. The Planning Division will contact you when each laminated notice is ready for you to pick up. After the form has been installed, please drop off a signed Affidavit of Posting, one for each notice., to show proof that the notice board and proper notices have been 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Faz (206) 431-3665 z• w. JU' Uo t yam.. cow .w Jam:. w o} g wQ ill d • xw: _. z z I-.. .w a cn' o1` wW. V . z •ui 'U =' • z• Notice of Completeness Page 2 installed. You will be responsible for removing the notice board from the site once your application has been approved and finalized, and when all public comment periods have terminated. Your permit application and SEPA checklist have been routed to appropriate departments for internal review, and any revision comments made back to you within 21 days of this notice. This is to insure that your proposal meets the substantive requirements of the zoning code and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. A Complete Application does not preclude the City to request revisions to your proposal through the formal project review phase that has now commenced. If you have any questions about this notice, or if you wish to speak to me sooner that my next response date, please do not hesitate to contact me as planner -in- charge of your project at (206) 431 -3673. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Reviewing City Departments 0 O' CO wr J 1-; wO g J: no z 1-O� zr~; °F w w` H V` LIT 0, Z' U N' o1_,. z NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATE: APRIL 16, 1999 The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: David Kehle, Architect LOCATION: 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116, Tukwila, WA FILE NUMBER: L99 -0009 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) PROPOSAL: To demolish an existing one -story office /showroom and shop building (approximately 7,000 sq. ft.); and upgrade and repair an existing shop. OTHER REQUIRED LAND USE PERMITS: SEPA (State Environmental Policy Review) These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 7, 1999. For information on the date and time of the public hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal contact Alexa Berlow, Planner -in- charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Planning Commission on a project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: January 28, 1999 February 24, 1999 May 12, 1999 1.. • I 1—Z. re 2 D: -1 C.) U O;_ cn p CO w 11.1 2. w 0; ga. u- a. 1-- w; I- 0 Z 1-; U0 ;o w w` U IL =. ui z V =' 0 17 z s. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION April 16, 1999 David Kehle, Architect 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Skagen Marine 10625 East Marginal Way E99.0004 (SEPA Application Checklist) L99 -0009 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) Dear Mr. Kehle: Your application for review of a State Environmental Protection Review (SEPA) Checklist and Shoreline Substantial development Permit to demolish an existing one story office /showroom and shop building (approximately 7,000 sq. ft); upgrade and repair an existing shop located at 10625 East Marginal Way, are considered complete as of February 24, 1999. The next step is for you to attach a laminated Notice of Application form on your notice board for the Shoreline Substantial Development. The notice for the SEPA will be installed once the final determination on the checklist has been made. Laminated notices for all permit activity associated with this project are to be posted on the notice board. For instructions and timelines to install a notice board on the site, please refer to Attachment B - Public Information Signs in the application packet. The Planning Division will contact you when each laminated notice is ready for you to pick up. After the form has been installed, please drop off a signed Affidavit of Posting, one for each notice. to show proof that the notice board and proper notices have been 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 IRMANOW z z. 6 .JU. 'o O • w =, J H N u_. w .o; LL Q' 1 W• . ~. w z �. I-O Z 1- 'D CI cri • Air ww U =. • • O F'-•; • • z Notice of Completeness Page 2 installed. You will be responsible for removing the notice board from the site once your application has been approved and finalized, and when all public comment periods have terminated. Your permit application and SEPA checklist have been routed to appropriate departments for internal review, and any revision comments made back to you within 21 days of this notice. This is to insure that your proposal meets the substantive requirements of the zoning code and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. A Complete Application does not preclude the City to request revisions to your proposal through the formal project review phase that has now commenced. If you have any questions about this notice, or if you wish to speak to me sooner that my next response date, please do not hesitate to contact me as planner -in- charge of your project at (206) 431 -3673. Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Reviewing City Departments ,z• • • 0 • rnw; w= .J F"t ,w • J: u-a U a.: moo°. •z ;w w: •• io co • ;w • F= V` . E-� • Z CITY TUKWILA COMMENTS Address: 10625 EAST MARGINAL WY S Permit No: E99-0004 Type: P-SEPA Location: Parcel #: 042304-9083 Status: PENDING Applied: 02/23/1999 Issued: *************************************************************************** Permit Comments: 5.08.00 PW has no comments; no work below OHWM, applicant will vegetate the river bank w/willow stakes above high water mark to the top of the bank to mitigate further river bank erosion - refer to march 7, 2000 agra letter to DAVID WILLIAMS/NORTWESTERN TRUST.JJS RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 3 1999 PERMIT CENTER SKAGEN MARINE: DEMOLITION IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES February 1, 1999 TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES A. ECONOMICAL DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT The demolition of an existing dilapidated structure and the repairing and painting of an existing structure on the site will only improve the visual impact to surrounding areas (Item 4). While shoreline public access is not present on site, there is a narrow undeveloped portion of property north of this site and there is no existing trail on this side of the Green River (Duamish), no public access is necessary. Public access to the west side of the Duwamish is via a trail access at the bridge south of this site and via a foot bridge from both Boeing facilities north and south of the site (2, 5, 6). B. PUBLIC ACCESS This is an existing developed piece of property with no current "public access" The existing bank is steep and only visual contact to the river would be appropriate. Public access is available on the west side of the Duwamish as described above. The water's edge is in public right -of way as the property description goes only to the high water mark. The waterway is obviously already public domain. (Ib, le, If). The trail system is on the west side of the Duwamish (3). Users of the facility will have picnic benches along the level part of the site behind the remaining building. C. CIRCULATION ELEMENT Roadways (East Marginal Way) already exist and is heavily traveled (Item 1). Parking is upland with access to top of bank along asphalt edge (2). Existing transit stops are in place (3). D. RECREATIONAL ELEMENT There are not public recreational access points along this site but user access is accommodated (1, 2). E. SHORELINE USE ELEMENT Users have not been identified as yet for the site. The site needs to be cleaned up and buildings made useable and occupiable prior to any leasing activity. The leasing activity will encourage shoreline uses, however since the bank is quite high relative to the water level, a direct access user is unlikely. (Item 1, 3 see above elements). F. CONSERVATION ELEMENT The removal of the one existing structure and repair of the other will greatly enhance the visual impact on surrounding properties and views across the river. Landscaping along the top of the bank to help stabilize and visual buffer the development is being included. (Item 1, 2) G. HISTORICAUCULTURAL ELEMENT None exist. Th TUKWILA SHORELINE MAt, TER PROGRAM POLICIES Page 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES A. Shoreline Development (Items 11 —15 do not apply since site is zoned MIC /H). The demolition of the existing building will have no adverse impact on wildlife, shorelines, watercourses, etc. and we are adding willow cuttings along the bank to help erosion. Additional landscaping along the top of the bank will actually enhance wild life. (Item 1, 2) No impacts to flooding or sewer systems is anticipated (Item 4 & 5). No public access is provided since the public trail exists on the west side of the Duwamish. (Item 16, 17). A. Not applicable. C. Projects within manufacturing /industrial center (MIC) The removal of one existing deteriorating building, the picnic area, the landscape screening all provides for enhanced visual quality and employees enjoyment. (1, 4, 8). Flood Control Uses No flood control structures will be built and planting of willow on the bank will help erosion as well as providing landscape on top of the bank. (1, 2, 3). E. Transportation This is not a transportation project. CITY OF Ti. .fl WILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: B. LOCATION OF PRROOJ � JECT /DEVVE�LOPMENT�:n, STREET ADDRESS: I tZo2' tl>eeti libL, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: IOW"' `"' c: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 03e .Let Quarter. VI- Section: Z. Township: V2 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) 11 NAME: b�vIQ I'" 1�e -' -ItiI .. 444K ADDRESS: 12I W � INS ' 6U it I l�lL) q& I(°? PHONE: - t* Aarii 40 F jj q SIGNATURE: / e"'iek DATE: 11 Z b I `� RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 3 1999 PERMIT CENTER 1.� FORSTAFFUSEONLY Planner::. File Number:. ii* b.1 o 0o GI Receipt :Number: • Project File #: Pt-� //5 •.0 3'�_.. ❑ Application•:complete (Date: ) SEPA File # :. • ©pp a . . 0 Application-incomplete (Date: ) 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: B. LOCATION OF PRROOJ � JECT /DEVVE�LOPMENT�:n, STREET ADDRESS: I tZo2' tl>eeti libL, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: IOW"' `"' c: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 03e .Let Quarter. VI- Section: Z. Township: V2 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) 11 NAME: b�vIQ I'" 1�e -' -ItiI .. 444K ADDRESS: 12I W � INS ' 6U it I l�lL) q& I(°? PHONE: - t* Aarii 40 F jj q SIGNATURE: / e"'iek DATE: 11 Z b I `� RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 3 1999 PERMIT CENTER 1.� I LL . L1,4 1-vogi4 ICW 1 ` ... 1 \V . L• . • . - D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION 4 The undersigned mks the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner a the property which Is the subject of tide application. 2. M statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application Is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. 1 understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agree may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e,g;, final building parts approval) will be,Ir orporetsd Into an agreement to be executed and recorded against tte property prior to issuance of any construction permits. . • declare under penalty of perjury under the law* of ine State of Washington and the United Staters of America that the foregoing statement Is true and correct. EXECUTED at, • 6AJI-(0141, g) (state); on (Print Name) arc ,3 S }.t a (Address) q3. M • (Phone Number) A (Signature) jS -Rope/. 1, Use additional sheets as needed for ell property owner signatures. 5 1999 D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at 199 (city), (state), on (Print Name) (Address (P ►one Number) (Signature) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. E. CURRENT ZONING OF PROPEI. -� � • i G Li F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: d► • 1 -t1;1) IL . NeHk,I 91Actioq ! L P ►'►rf G. P ., .► • fXj G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: Ikea (Iitt awry) H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SU ROUNDING LAND USES: Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) C E 1 f U 1) 1 "WA' 10 II I liBU!' tom. -,� V :P. f. 16; e+ I FIG) W jef,A0GlirttIO C , .0 Hols9l Hq t44124 kx9 4To1-1 6wo I11W ,>R,/ It 1 ILL u ) 4LN i' Ii'll -tP t. C511811Vr .1 j ,)t-le ) I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION CO$T & FAIR MARKET future phases of development contemplated VALUE of the proposed development: (Include additional • but not included in current proposal.) J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED NfriDiAtint1/41 q/ bm 5(19f-wig titruill IMPROVEMENTS: 6int-Fiabovarti o w fiff rtitu v,-kVto E 11'YMM 41- Fo w l-1cl tol Z l a ii - a NIttostki blew , P• 114 K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY completed on subject site, indicate month and COMPLETED: (If an portion or phase of the proposed activity is already year of completion.) 1--W L. PROPOSED STARTING ESTIMATED COMPLETION (If project will be constructed DATE: Mit 7 1 �' la4`i. DATE OF CONSTRUCTION in stages, indicate ACTIVITY: 40V VI . dates:) • M. TYPE AND EXTENT a 100- 1. OF OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: C i• . fl1tM l.i Ye., at'a_ 1 IV • �r i.% .. N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): j - SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 • . 3 O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC PROPOSED (if any): I hhACCESS P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PAR ING/LOADI G/S�TO�RAE AREAS AND PROP ED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high water mark.) '7 I .10 . f i � t 1 - ' �fj 1 412. 11 DM -0 g obtar,--) Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark.) 130911424 tillArsIliG L Eli ke2,ilt dr 4DI 14H Hlui -i tkierEtz i tOlffi 1711 t 6-" .+ Vb. I 1 Rio- pli -tfior POOP R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABIT T IN AND ALONG RIVER: 1461-11Xa If-k4 btt -ti If or DO. -, btu E 044172, . II. "TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, ,delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 4 III. -OTHER PERMITS REOUI ' FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. ❑ Tukwila Conditional Use Permit ❑ Tukwila Variance Permit Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: SEPA decision date: ❑ Tukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval ❑ Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood Ord. #1462) ❑ Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ❑ Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA ❑ DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) 0 Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife) ❑ Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination ❑ System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) "P Aquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) PERMIT # ❑ Other. - SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 APPUCATION DATE DATE APPROVED 5 z I.. Iz 00 • CO C1' cn w: J H. w 0: IL <. co O. = W z �. Z OH. 11J ui: U� :0E- ww h=- U z O I- Z CITY OF TUKWILA Department of immunity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development (DCD). Please contact the DCD if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until the application is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vesting of the applicant's rights. However, submittal of these materials in no way limits the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. The DCD Planning staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: A• pplication Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application a Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) Q' Shoreline Permit Application Fee ($550) S• EPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) ❑ Design Review Permit Application (if building permit required) (6 copies) ($900) ❑ Utility Permit Application for Flood Control Zone (4 copies) Utility Permit Application for Storm Drainage Review (4 copies) PLANS [Six (6) copies of the following]:. V• icinity map showing location of the site. 0' Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's property lines. rgir Survey at a scale of 1" = 20' or 1 "=30', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the surveyor with surveyor's original signature. The following information must be contained on the survey: O Property dimensions, lot size and names of adjacent roads O Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - . Distance to federal projects and navigation channels O Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment . O Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffers (TMC 18.45.040) O Existing grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% O Existing trees over 4" in diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved " Q . Shoreline profile cross - sections at minimum 75 -foot intervals along GitA� .--� 9 ::-�, s shoreline, showing: 0 Existing top of bank, Ia, iard catch -point of levee, riverbank to: .v1ean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) . O Proposed structures/improvements O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels O Limits of the River Environment, 60 -foot Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment O Existing and proposed ground elevations O Plan view location of shoreline profile cross - sections Site plan at same scale as survey, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the architect. The following information must be contained on the site plan: O Property lines and names of adjacent roads O Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment O Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffer widths (TMC 18.45.040) O Proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond the subject property's boundariest with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% O Construction limit lines, and areas of clearing/grading /filling Notations identifying source, composition, volume (cu. ft.) and extent (acres) of any fill material - Notations identifying composition, volume (cu. ft.) extent (acres) and proposed disposal site of any extracted material O Erosion control measures and tree/buffer protection measures (e.g. barricades, fencing). O Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with required setbacks O Lowest finished floor elevation O Location of driveways, fire lanes, parking, loading and service areas, with parking calculations and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening O Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas O Location of site fumiture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art O Location and type of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications, including any trail easements O Dike /riverbank maintenance easement (min. width: 30' riverward from catch -point of levee) O Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of utilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications O Conceptual storm drainage plans with storage, detention and water - quality improvements (see Utility Application requirements for Storm Drainage Review) O Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences tLandscape/planting plan at same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be contained on the plan: O Existing trees to be saved by size and species O Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing O Location of service areas, vaults and mechanical units with proposed screening. z w re 2 O 0 CO 0 U) = -F • w 0' g Nd = W z� z1 111 uj 0— ww z I— .Z. al co O~ z Building elevations and floor plans at a scale of 1/4" = 1' 1 /8 "ith graphic scale and date. Each sheet shall have the ' ,se stamp of the architect. Include on,' elevations: t Dimensions pf all building facades and major architectural elements 0 Location and type of exterior building lighting NIK 0 Location of mechanical units with proposed screening S' Floor plan and square footage for uses a One (1) high quality 8 1/2" x 11" reduction of the above plans. changes, an additional set of reductions may be required. l2 APPLICANTS RESPONSE TO SHORELINE PERMIT QUESTIONS & DESIGN POLICIES Written responses to attached Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application questions and Shoreline Design Policies (6 copies). If the project undergoes significant ❑ OTHER MATERIALS Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate, such as color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to be considered, eight (8) copies of each must be submitted (except models). .Color drawings or photos may be submitted as 8.5 x 11 -irich color photocopies. ❑ PUBLIC NOTICE: O' King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject property. O' Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings --e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks —must be included.) See Attachment A. O )A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on -site within 14 days of the Department -- determining that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B. IV. -IMPACTS ON SHORELINE • OLICIES A. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE. MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. CommerciaVindustrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commerciaVdevelopment in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. 3. Preference should be given to commercial /industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 6 ROM : J 8 P DESIMONE PHONE NC:. : 2069383622 RZA AGRA, Inc. (formerly Rittenhouse Zeman & Associates, Inc.) • Engineering & Environmental Services 13 October 1992 Security Pacific Corporation Real Estate Management Services T16 -1 Security Pacific Tower, P.O. Box 3966 Seale, Washington 98109.3181 Attention: Ms. Shirley Agullera Sublect: - Sump Pump Out Documentation 10625-29 East Marginal Way Property Seattle, Washington Dear Ms. Agullera: May 26 1999 11:37AM P01 etia G:t • trably. 4F4 11335 NE 122nd Way Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 -6918 (206) 820 -4669 FAX (206) 821-3914 W4111. 04.: • RZA AGRA, Inc. conducted a Geotechnlcal and Environmental site assessment for the above referenced site. in our report dated 9 July 1992, we made several recommendations concerning the condition of an existing sump located In the nonhem part of the main buliding. We recommended that the fluid In the sump be reinoved and that the sump be inspected for structural Integrity. The report also suggested an investigation to determine the location of the discharge outlet of a drain adjacent to the sump. Analytical results (by EPA Method 6010) of fluid samples collected from the site indicated that cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc concentration were 1,700 ppb, 2,800 ppb, 1,800 ppb, 360 ppb, 4.4 ppb and 530 ;ppb, respectively. A copy of the laboratory certificate Is attached. Following our recommendations, the sump fluid (approximately 200 gallons) was manifested as non - hazardous materiel and removed on October 2,1992 by Northwest EnviroService, Inc. Confirmatory testing � v y o est EnviroService (NWES) by Toxicity Characteristic Leachin ' Procedure CLP) Indicated that the fluid is norclaufpW.L.vas manifested by NWES as such. A copy of NWES's confirmatory testing (waste product questionnaire) Is attached. At the time of disposal, the sump was visually inspected and appeared to be structurally sound. No major cracks were observed In the sump walls, however the sump's wooden cover was in a state of dlarepair and may pose an unsafe condition. The drain located next to the sump and was found to have Its discharge directly Into the sump. 4A AGRA Earth & Environmental Group z z w. J U. 0 00: wI: .N ti •w W Q. N d. 1w; Z Z17: • w N ww Z: t= � z FROM : 3 8 P DESIMONE • PHONE NO; : 2069383822 May. 26 1999 11:38PM P @2 Security Pacific Corporation W- 8219 -2 13 October 1992 Page 2 Based upon the metals concentrations of the sump Auld, we recommend additional subsurface sous be sampled for metal concentrations beneath the sump upon demolition of the existing building and the sump. We eppreclate this opportunity to be of service to Security Pacific Corporation and would be pleased to furthir discuss our results and recommendations with you. Respectfully submitted, ,RZA;AGRA, Inc. ig Stephen J. Nichol! Engineering Technician 2tid,ree Dale A. Kra ner Protect Scientist trarca Laboratory Certificate Waste Product Questionnaire SJN /DAK/LAD AGRA Earth & Environmental Group . 1 I w mw V; 'UO' V)0. tnw w =: :WO' IL.. <C.: N 1-w ,Z Z :w • V co; O { z 1_I OM : J 8. P DES I MONE viroService, inc. 13oa ?4443. Seattle. Wasntngton 9812e (206) 62' '090 4sief us. EPA es • Yt Yt hrt tot 1 1 WOW Nam and Fa/01V Mdraq KA109 Skagen Boats 10625 -29 E. Marginal Way •9aattle, WA 98168 PHONE NO. : 2069383822 May. 26 1999 11:40AM P01 Fume Norisiit 4?D91 fi —S v"mle011°Shizley 'Aauilara +.stoma vnu.J Generator's copy will 6111 mailed back after NWES r �w We Aelinia "10 a .:1:L il ,: !, 4.`+,.':r: r - ':4', WP Q 48413 WASTE PRODUCT OLSCflIPTION 8 CIIAIIACTERISI ICS ifferCrate = vith trace sediment (nu „ —ha. aus ) • ye ,.;.. • ..w. A A P • % — V V i f sump Myeloid Mute at TOW. Solid ❑ Sludge Liquid 0 Powder Compressed Gas Pno Urtut.s et 70'F. [. Yes 0 No Volume 1 0 0 < 7o•F. x170• -99•F. 0 100•- 139•F. plum p.ktt 0140'•200•F. ❑ Closed Cup 9rin•F ❑ oponCup No Flash Exact pH ] <2 010.1.12.4 j 4.1.10 [ Eric( Solid. ❑ By Volume Dissolved • Suspended 'G METALS 0 Toxicity Characteristic .Leaching Procedure (TC ) enio (As)' ... • Mercury (Hg) .. <0.2 •item (9a) .. • • 0•73"-- 1 nium (Cc!) • • „mium (C() ,per(Cu) .•• cr72- -` -- j (Ph) •nes ides lea Nickel (NI) Density or Specific Gravity Odor 1'. 0 0 0 None r1 Strona it,s�ytn:^ -1.:1 muy Describe 0 Solid Selenium (Se) . Silver (Ag) .... <l 7inc12n) �U • 141An..eteinfah � KEf T1VES ANO OTHER WASTES (PPM)NT l+�V 1+_._. PCS's� �.... —._ HexChrome ... HOC Ibsfi.3 Larne Multllayered Cti•Lay.t:d Homogenous COW tan -car WASTE PRODUCT CHEMICAL COMPOSITION IA•. 1,11111 roe ttllr;• 01 Torrdi • H2O HCi H2SO. mmo, NaOH Phenols Chlorides Sum Sediment Q)her (SoecfJv); ' eater 100 . %TRACE NILN INFOHMA ION trshi in Name: Sump eater and sediment on nazar aus) . U.S. EPA Hazardous Codes HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES ' —Hazard Class: I.D. 0: i.n pv.s .Q-- •nnnwrdorrt++rnvU nos ONO' udnp.rou. WWI wet p ves 1 Shipping Container: Drum ❑ Volume, Bulk 6 Volume _. ❑ Type Volume •eeted: .Gais'lbs par ❑ mo ❑ yr. hai Labels Requires Was'ungton Slate Codes AW.n'� CS.... —• .... V ... n. V 6440 t•.W.na Ntinio.tc- ❑GunuWs 0 Subject to Land Disposal Restrictions 11 Chart/ZUNIS l„l Maaelive a100ne 01 Move Li Ott (II marked. fill out notification sheet) Special Handling Reoukerrlents: GENERATOR CERTIFICATION STATEMI NT 1 minter 4644 ONO .e M. monortr.d repmeentatm,e of Ina °enamor owned above. eM tnkemalion aubm.tled in tnis and oil the allacMd documents le true and .eeufaw. MNysis of ins weave vas CbneeCtad in accordance wen not eoofa.d net methods in AO CFR 261 On a taptessnnt..e swots as debned to e0CFR2G1.20. To IM ben t my kno••+.oge. an known (4oGFRa61) and untamed harardoua components tune boon Mewed in title dOCumantstion, Signers 11,0 -Dan •alley Cnam.csSN•uuo 00 01 Do. NWES INC. USE ONLY Oat.Rane.sd 'sums I ❑ ADO�o..diNorne e 0 Denied z i- W 00 N0 cn W w0 LQ _ Ci H =. zl. ZOO CU U• � O N C1 I- W w H II wz U= O~ z 1•: ROM : J 8 P DESIMONE •.ANORTH 'CREEK ANALYTICAL PHONE NO : 2069383822 r-� May. 26 1999 11:43RM P01 tZA /AGRA 1335 NE122nd Way, #100 Kirldand, WA 96034 • Attention: Dale Kramer Anaiyte ' ntimony •NNI Arsenic.— 4i a� Ilum ante 9000•99•01099 ••••N 0000.. Client Project ID: Sample Descript Analysts Method: Sample Number: Matrbc 18939 120th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 • Bothell. WA 98011.2580 Phone (2061481.9200 • FAX (206) 485.2992 Security Pacific Sank, W4219 Sump 1 EPA 6010/7000 205 -1375 Water TOTAL E.P.A. PRIORITY METALS PAH Detection Limit pg /L (ppb) 100 200 20 ••• »•N••»•• .••..•••»••• »0400• Sampled: May 27, 1992 Received: May 27, 1992 Digested: Jun 9, 1992 Analyzed: Jun 9- 10,1992 R orted: Jun 12. 1992 ay 90 Sample Results N9 /i- (ppb) N.D. N.D. N.D. • sv0 7 � m:• ,a t.va -- •- ..*••. • 999 9 . • .. •..v:•• .....• ° •t•' . .".t. • •or .5..., ,.mow... :TT�_'.'......++e•..�na 4'........ �uw-'.+`•^*' r.». ii C,,, t '��'�„'-c�a'_...........:...,.. �x.. ,00.- •" ;` it•wv.v -+- n t.• 'Ywu•.-.."..v.';=,....r......�. . .• •... .. t•• .•.• • •b.�,•.. •.••• NIiM••M••,,,, i • • rue+".'•i8%'?�a +"•w." ,0.00. ":�. �T��:v.Z "..'�,�",•.'�"��'i �+=rY^t'T'CYt"f tS4in7 'rt°'tTe7°nil�ll•"- ,;�..... .✓ • • .v.n�,••s.`•;•••e _ � 00.0.: .F:::.' �T- ._ti:.s.+:.T:+^,.iT1 �Y ffYTt'!Z^T]YXI•Yr IY�IILi ir..�L .......A. 0000. �... ,.::- .::.:.;Yi. n• ay 14 a ••• OR •••• R. • •j(yp•.•••. i!l••••N«w!.jWt MNN K • .»NM POP IC »••••»»••••»••.»»»•• »N.»• »••••»».»••i••••••»M..•... •••• TSelenlum 0000.» Aver »........».... » »..... »......... . hanium..•••...••.. ••• 0909 9909.... 150 50 100 10 200 000000, DO ONO. OOOOOOOO 0009 0900 .09 • • N.D. N.D. N.D. 11 �.•,-- , �. ;-- �..- ..--- mow.... • �.x. �Yri- :•r�rn't'�:�r�•t KYY�i. Qt.. .t: �.........,.. .��,t; styles reported as N.O. were not present above the stated limit of detection. IH CREEK ANALYTICAL Inc Cocanour boratory Director 2051375.RZA < 1 a. • Z • ;�w O • �tn w W =. w oo` g' • u,^^..a: Zal.. Z p. z I- USA N :w w •.Z; • O 1 Pacific Hagfish NO EYES NO PAIRED FINS .> FLAT POINTED SNOUT BEARING 8 BARBELS AND SMALL SUCKING DISC! LARGE ANUS 10.14 GILL PORES (HOLES) SPECIES: Eptatretus stautl —from the Greek hepta and ketos, meaning "seven" and "apertures;" and honouring Dr. Arthur B. Stout, former secretary of the California Academy of Sciences. ALTERNATE NAMES: California hagfish, common hagfish, hagfish, hag -fish, hag, slime eel' . MAXIMUM RECORDED SIZE: 63.5 cm (25 inches). DISTRIBUTION: Bahia San Pablo, central Baja California, Mexico, to southeastern Alaska. 2 Pacific Lamprey NO JAWS 7 GILL PORES (HOLES) SUCKING DISC WITH: (a) TOOTH AT TOP OF MOUTH WITH 3 POINTS (b) 4 PAIRS OF SIDE TEETH lc) TOOTH AT BOTTOM OF MOUTH WITH 5 POINTS SPECIES: Lampetra trldentatus —from Latin Iambere, petra, tri and dentatus, "to suck," "stone," "three" and "tooth." ALTERNATE NAMES: Pacific sea - lamprey, threetoothed lamprey, tridentate lamprey, . sea lamprey. MAXIMUM RECORDED SIZE: 76 cm (30 inches) and .5 kg (1 pound). DISTRIBUTION: Punta Canoas, central Baja California, Mexico, to the Bering Sea coasts of Alaska and Asia, then south to the Yuhutu River, Hokkaido northern Japan. An almost impossible direct catch, the Pacific lamprey may occasionally dangle from a hooked salmon or other gamefish. More likely, though, the angler who catches a salmon, steelhead trout, Pacific hake, sablefish or arrowtooth flounder may notice a circular mark which bears witness to a Pacific lamprey attack. Surprisingly, identical wounds may also pock various whales, including the blue, humpback, sei, finback and sperm. Frequently though, predator becomes prey; sometimes sperm whales feed upon Pacific lamprey. Very rarely would a diver site the active Pacific lamprey because it dwells at depths inaccessible to sport aquanauts. Occasionally used for reduction to meal, Pacific lamprey on their spring migration frequently enter the nets of river -based fishermen. Gillnetters and seiners often find some of their harvested salmon carrying either wriggling Pacific lampreys or circular wound scars indicative of past attacks. How many salmonid victims annually die from such attacks is as yet undetermined. Like its anadromous prey the salmon, this lamprey ascends rivers and creeks to spawn. Working together as mated pairs from April to July, Pacific lampreys construct gravel nests, stone by stone with their suctorial mouths. Shorebound naturalists never sight the Pacific lamprey in shallow accessible marine waters, but dipnet - wielding native Indians and some European immigrants gather specimens in streams. Some folk eagerly eat fried, broiled, or baked Pacific lamprey while others prefer it smoked. 4 3 River Lamprey NO JAWS • 7 GILL PORES (HOLES) SUCKING DISC WITH: (a) TOOTH AT TOP OF MOUTH WITH 2 POINTS (b) 3 PAIRS OF SIDE TEETH (e) TOOTH AT BOTTOM OF MOUTH WITH 6POINTS SPECIES: Lampetra ayresi —from the Latin Iambere and petra, "to suck" and "stone;" and honouring its discoverer, early naturalist William O. Ayres. ALTERNATE NAMES: western river lamprey, parasitic river lamprey, western brook lamprey, western lamprey. MAXIMUM RECORDED SIZE: 31 cm (12.2 inches). DISTRIBUTION: San Francisco Bay, central California, to Lynn Canal and the Taku River, southeastern Alaska. Because the Pacific herring is Its favourite prey, the river lamprey may attack plug cut herring or herring strip being dragged through the water to lure salmon. Such attacks may be fairly common near the surface from June to September in some locales. If plagued by these predators, retain them as live bait and then bottomfish for Itngcod or rockfish, all of which may eat river lamprey. Divers almost never see the river lamprey unless this predator attacks a herring or small salmon near the surface. Expect only a brief glimpse because these fish avoid the aquanaut, and live in open water. As an unwanted "bonus" adhering to captured salmon, the economically underutilized river lamprey is occasionally taken by seiners and trotters. • Usually this lamprey fastens along the upper side of the host between the victim's head and tail. While larger, stronger salmon often survive these attacks, maintaining circular scars, the smaller Pacific herring Is usually completely devoured. Like its anadromous prey the salmon, the river lamprey migrates to fresh water for Intricate courtship and spawning activities. The feeding river lamprey might attack an unsuspecting herring, young salmon, or anchovy adjacent to a wharf or jetty where the naturalist could actually observe the entire activity. Throughout the world, other cultures feast upon the delicate flesh of lampreys. Skin and try it —any recipe for eels will do. Smoked or fresh, the river lamprey offers potentially fine eating. 5 Z W re 2 6 U: 00 co W 2. w wO gJ v. 1--w Z I— O Z ILI w. O- ww �. L O fu .z. P. O~ Z • PHOTO 8: WESTERLY VIEW OF THE PETROLANE STORAGE SHEDS LOCATED ON PARCEL B OF THE SUBJECT SITE. PHOTO 9: THE 18,000 GALLON ABOVEGROUND STROAGE TANK LOCATED ON PARCEL B OF THE SUBJECT SITE. PROJECT NAME SKAGEN BOATS /PETROLANE PROJECT NO. 07181 DATE 12/30/91 ATEC V PHOTOLOG 5: Photos 8 & 9 M 4sercr. TOP OF SLOPE B- 1 /MW -1 DUWAVISH RIVER B -2 t9 -� TP -4 • PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH LEGEND B- 3 /MW -2 MONITORING WELL /BORING NUMBER AND LOCATION (PREVIOUS STUDY) TP -7 19 TEST PIT NUMBER AND LOCATION (CURRENT STUDY) AREA OF POSSIBLE TENSION CRACKS WITH MAXIMUM 0.5 FOOT DISPLACEMENT APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CRACKS IN EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB . +�: + ---• EAST MARGINAL WAY AGRA Earth & Environmental 11335 N.E. 122ND WAY, SUITE 100 KIRKLAND, WA, U.S.A. 98034 -6918 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FORMER SKAGEN MARINE FACILITY SEATTLE, WASHINGTON CRY OF TUKWILA SEP 2 8 1999 PERMIT CENTER FIGURE .Z Z; aa 2: .W= JO, O • (n W. W =; J.� U% LL D. W O` LL ZCJ• [N W, _. ; • • WC •L D 0i • • OF W' V U; OI~,. Z SITE AND BUILDING STATISTICS 1. BUILDING CODE. UBC '97 2. ZONING. MIC /H 3. ZONING SETBACKS. FRONT 20' SIDE 0 REAR 0 4. BUILDING AREA. BUILDING 1 4,000 SF - TO REMAIN BUILDING 2 7.053 SF - TO BE REMOVED 5. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION BUILDING 1 V -N NON- SPRINKLERED BUILDING 2 V -N NON- SPRINKLERED 6. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY, BUILDING I FI /SI /BIM BUILDING 2 F1 /01 /11/14 7. AREA OF EX, ASPHALT, 19,038 SF B. AREA OF NEW ASPHALT. 8,147 SF APPROX. 9... TOTAL SITE AREA, 42,144 S.F. SCOPE IT YORK. REMOVE 3 EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING SLABS AND FOUNDATIONS OF APPROXIMATELY 7,053 SF. REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT BETWEEN BUILDING AND TOP OF BANK. RE-ASPHALT AND GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM RIVER AT ,,THE REMOVED BUILDING AREAS. REMOVE DEBRIS AND EXCESS MATERIAL FROM SITE, CAP ALL UTILITIES AT PROPERTY LINE OR AS 9(0219E0 BY CITY /177TILITY COMPANIES. M. OKnOnTWALOUVMMK w: Dulu411614 RivER4. .e..w.,.., N• on..• ■:m PAM .owi Aar nallaKUM ,a0ak r 080.G 621.1 N. roKAMID Irmo .w„o NNW IMP APO aim ow am. Pt •YM Cap AI *WV G� T f ----- --- MILK AID YO CLLM Loin. NJS0a ,0.lMA PACIFIC RUT. SOWN C.11,10 Mr *COMA ..wareamn, DAwa ns a 1 in • ■4',U CJl On m. NC.n n.T mnau 21. SITE PLAN — DEMOLITION PLAN wy ',M.O. I - •M 12/22/98 4,33 Pn CACA0V9737SKA .' , .no -.. op Z 6 0 0 co W I— W W0 u- Q Z� I— 0 Z tl"' W • W U0 ON. O 1- W W • o uj Z c O E" 55 P4AIV4M MOH NM. MAIM TOP CP BANK 605 �� 6 C5 DUVAMISH RIVER 505 - °36170 ON, 105 5 R5 h0 Vxn RATS TM rxw•wt I•p MI MX 41.1.11K17.10 TO WC SCC uvom.orto NR / 5715 5 E EA FO 5EA -SEA ‘z- G/ 5 EA C trrefineerifejaPittit, - •�B!�.. oo �00o_o4oA. °'O`sd`oo PA °_o0 2 05 LANDSCAPE NOTES: I. 906RA0E5 FOR AL 04450400 LNOSLAPE AREAS 60IGAIED 1411E LNOSUPE PLANS TO BE YT AT 6' MS P5194 EILVATIC%E CEPT A510704. RAGE 6' GP 2.0401' TOPSOIL IN ALL 1040 P1N111N6 AREAS 85 0115AA61LY 00 70 41 67 60 51156 049E TO A 904111 OF 6'. 2. 600100 0•100 TO EOM LFOM ALL 900100.45112CE 000403 AT TIC 'RLYLD WILMS TO PROVIDE 004IE%E 105.046E IN ALL 044011405 BEDS 90546110104 TO 0000140 60000 COVER 5. A.1. 101 BCD AREAS 51441 HAVE 1044H-51E BARK KVA INSTALLED 10 A 014)4049EP14 or 1'. 4, LAVES GAR' 00444065 ARE BASED ON TIC SI1E PLANS PREPARED BY DAVID KALE 40441075. 440IA1ELY 01rY LNO"SOAPE ARCANI0LT OF 0114' F1E10 0480■05 TO 541E P%•6 414011 MAY FLOML' 00451•00 GP 9031640 5. REFER TO CIVIL 0164004.06 9/'440/'4065 FOR 6AADMS NO 900046E 0i0r0MT10 4. 1140121ATELY 400417 OMER OF A4Y ADVEAE GRAMME 00O4T10 41 NCH HAY AFFECT TIE IEALTN Cr PLANT NATObAL 6. /LL 101 LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE 40064719 MTh NI 401'04150 �OER6PQ10 004601104 5151041 1. 00000 TO REGIFICAT1046 FOR ADDITIONAL 111ORKABON OLANDSCAPE PLAN r. .O' ■ ■ PACIFIC HWY. SOUTH • TA11M Mm 11131 ANT SCHEDULE 173117•1A0IU1%713 NOVA 0 Id 20' 40 M7_1 i„1 SCALE• 4'"20 -0' SYMIOL BOTN11GA1. NAPE / COMM WE SIZE NOTES 5YMa. BOTM0GAL NAPE / COMMON /WE SIZE NOTE5 54645 ,' TREES ACM R '415661RONV / N461Roo RED HARE 24/2' co L 018, HAMMED FORM R PO 00 PRO°5 LISITANGA / PORN60. LRAM. MIA L SRO 0045040' / OTTO LINKER LAUREL 094.44II1.15 H. VAR E6AN5 / 10LY4EAF 058004 50.561 M. 2144' SFR 00.2' M. 310, 4' 0L. 545, 5' OL. 810, 5' 0L. LS CO61.0 5TCLOIr0 0 / 0041046 506MM 50 -56' M. BIB, 4' 00. }415 000100ARA 1 SCOA0R 1511.05 5'i' HT. BIB, 0,111+5100 OF COME, 5.TT.AVIRAEA' /100,1.04/06 0064500 50,561 M. BIB, 4' 04. RN REV. 0MKAlA /IIOOTKA005E 15.6.1. BIB. 4'0L. TUHRICATA /TB10444 RID CEDAR 6' HT. FELL I BFJM, 045 RS R�� 174816 /SAMOEQ+A1 162'1. BMW 00. 3 rj MAW WARS I 3 ARLTOSTAAIM.O5 0VA4R51 / KININ4000 •• POT 24.0L. I...: • 1 509 L4Y4 `k SPEC. EMEM LRNO ■/0005® 405 • 040005044 9P10AIW / ME 5451.41 BRAYS 2044 50 LDS / ACRE EAR5406LA.CA N/ IDRR860055 2044 7811414 00401NACEA 1 TALL MLLE 2044 POA 1(0000 / 5.408006 BEE CRASS 2044 O 600409 COVER SPAGIN6 0.125 OR LEADER !ME, SPAG16 TO 5< TRIMS. 401 D6TANGE 4 904 ON PLANT 544051E F Ives gl� 601I1 11g lt.0W1131T1®11A ®Im,d mq 11110111111 011111 ®1HENNE1111 1111118401= o5HRUB FLANTIN& 116 PLAIT TRQ5 4641 ENOW1 TO AL4CM 410SIIIVE 9004006E MAY FR041 R00I15A1L LONIRAGT0R540000'615 140 (01M1A0T011 SIAL1. 1.'E RE:1040132 FOR M IEN.N OF ALL ICILY 16101.100 ?LAMS FCR 5001)6 5EA5044 6 009160 A5 OGCA.Fd26 FROM YAM TO WRNS. FOR FALL INSTALLATSN 710 600116 MALM TOLL 80614 THE F050TON6 5PRIN6. LON1PA0TOR WALL 40414•E Mt RANTS THAT NE PALMS. PEAK CETFL11VE W HAMM OF 6004151 CR MAP 040146 706 6ROFINS SEASON AS 00001© BY TIE 10OSGAAE ARGIIEGT, lHESS TIE FA/15E OP RE PI-ALT 440105100 6 510 TO 140E 408116010E OF 11E CRIER. OR O(E56110 FAEIRE 15 PE TO V00■0191. `TVL0ELY COLD NICER TEARER 041 OT01R 35100E KAIOW. 5810014:11.4, OR A4HA. DN06E KRALOOR 041115 SILL 54 110 540E 05 TIE 5100 APO 174E AS 11710 0 0 6 40411' MSTALED O/E.b 01 46C DIWL' LED BY 11E 1001'410 MGMILT. 400010041 415 R6TA.LAT1014 OF REPIKMNT PLANTS 41.50159401.1.54160 OBR0161SUTY W .041E CONTRACTOR. OEPLXAENT PLANTS 5041 EE I16•PLTED AS MGR= ABOVE FOR TE 0016110. INSTA,0104 NO SHALL BE 1'440440.004 FCR 60 OAY5 MUM* Pe5TALLATIOL RAMS THAT NAVE SETTLED IN 'MR 41.44011405 PITS TO) CCM, T00 "JV41d(LC054 00 CROONED "544.1 BE REPLANTED AS 91000104 BYTE 4006044E 40047001. 1440TDINIC . 004130CTOR 51141. 000TM411E PLA4f1N65 FOR A FLAW GP PE 60106 5EASO4 P011405 INSTALLATION 141411006E PLAN I. 011641E ALL PLANT 0414044.5 41114 AFTRO654ATELY 1' O' 440TER RR PEEK FROM HAY 11NN64I0"I M5E R OP T1E P4415T 110 SEASONS FOl1011NS 0010,1010410065054051410. AO FLAW I[A.T4 NAIL0ALLY =LRAM RRELIPITATSN MAY 5.05111015 FOR 00601100 RATER N'PUCATI0N PER NEATER 0015171016. 2. REMOVE F®5 405 6000505 FINN 150 9001403 OF 13005 NO 54005 NAWIAMNS A HECK RIIRS AT TIE BASE OF EALN PEED R01NAL TO 515 PRE MCD TICE PER YEAR, 5. REPLACE ALL DEAD, 91'916 OR DMA.ED FLAW 041004415 90440611E FIRST TEAR AMR 1)6TALLA104. 4. REMOVE All 111174 PULSE, NO Na41NTNE 6064170110 4 06. 1414ALAYAN BLAGKEERRY, 0EC0 MART MUSS, 10E660001 OLAGKEEORY, 5.015 FROCK ENSLI5N IVY,1040114S SLOW, .44PNE"E 0/011004, EFL. WORE TRAK NTH DORE STRAW OP 1 6406E 6ALV. NIE FR/4PCD IN CLEAR VIM. DIST 1I6M 2' D140 TSVG' LOOW.= PRE TREE 51•473 TOTI 6' LAICAL POW "N 56' PA TREE FELL5IN LAN AREAS. FILL KM 2' OF 5PFLFl04 KILN MOVE TOP 414 O' ORLAP. LOOSEN TIRE BASKETS BA .4. PIT NTH MS TOPSOIL NO 5044 NAIVE 505- ADO SPELFIED NOTILI000 TO 406 Brumbaugh A A1401 id IP6 L•nd1O•p• Arohll•Dlur• 321 PM Moe 41-. Me 111 7.1.0i0,u:A4rim 1.163 1 real.. cam 1104 PM TO BE 25 111E 0.0015411 PA OON GRADE TREE PLANTING 4155 1 063 5 84 4" Lej Z w 6 JU OO CO W J H U) LL w0 u N L -1 SITE AND BUILDING STATISTICS 1.' 701L0114 COOL L 2MING 1 MINING SETBACKS UDC •R7 .111CM PRINT, 20' SIDES. 0 KM. 0 BALDING AREA . TOTAL • 4.000 Sr VPICEIPUTOKI .1100 0 00.161.0110 .3.100.0 OCCUPANCY 0611 . arms • B VAK1t11E • TI 6. TYRE 0' CMSTINCTIM Y -N SLAIN- SfRINKLEKDT ,. PARKING KOuIRE0 PUTIOE RrICE 600 Sr 3/100 • L. CMS 0A*EWUSE 3.200 Y (/2000 • 1.6 CARS • CARS L PARKING SNOW .A /1 VAR ACCESSIBLE STALLS 1. SIZE AKA. 2.144 S.E. 10 AREA 0r EXISTING ASP.NL7 . 27, Ih 0. r. ti. MK• or KNGO[L . 70 sr . SCOPE OF WORK. BRING THE EXISTING 1C701 BUILDING BACK TO SIRUCMAL INTEGRITY DELUDING KPA1R110 2•BR.CING. SAG RODS AND SILL ANGLE, 117A1R D ANCED SIDING AND ROVING MD REPAINT. INSTALL WV MIAMI. RE- INSTALL C1CC711CAL SERVICE. STRIPE LOT PIN PARKING StKLS. R@EX GF allA ' 4 M R�w.v. o.ufti nd DA01101 PLAN 4YA106 MART FNTION v 11071.3171 LOTS • AM L. a .K1700 . TOWS= n AalR. WW1 • D21 A.R.. mamma AR. Art �v* • pm II T1. M oran D�6•rn ITT KW= 417 MOTTO 1• acme Ra.av .N un ®a WM. •obi• vmf.aiD MARI TIM ROM mum Lan aw WS WINS MST _ _ �NOIO SS /11011 mmYwi VW 10•171• Or valamlvSDp q�4 • tn.. WAIN TIM'ARt'°'•.I.'W ma •1. MM. 1111. max SS MM. 111 MOM SS MOMS TM▪ = 110011•1•1130.1 uoss •Sr• Warr /111111 TO • TOUT TO IN. RS TIM M MMOt1S 0021. 16 0qn •• =OW. 111R TO TT/ TNT Mei O •ri MOATS a m Mn a T... COMM M 0. 1.R OT C•Oly. PA6m. 2. • 1.71011 Or R. .•TINIMP. O P M 11 .[a • 101.1.• I. NOR. MKS L. tre. r.1.1 n mDrF14 PALM M L0K40 ' if A ® 1.1r""'I est;1'v 1. 1 00 Rain er • �re OY WO 1 N1•[i 1iRi., . VS SN vrw 0 0* l T.I.0 TOM rem NM. Tr ma . •Wwa r 1,••• rv.l :OZ.1.c1,14 [ 1.11CM 36S.811 MSTT 10 TY 1W iNINT r SKivOa • .:a: Cl an a DRS •ARKMT1°. i6 SO▪ WN LINZ Or ARMaa s*A MTN A41.vm 1.1110111 aY STORM NUT 70 INS WM WM Or in O.M� T• @FU 11St.. �Mmai TO TES M`O• ro t MRCS SOO.. YAW ILLIS WOW 11. TO • PMTS nz.M 1.[F. OTT Or 10•7.4r man M 01. MATS 01 1111.7Ma. r' m SOOTS IS aOWRY .4 CUIUAMISN RIVER `101141rRrcu KA` ITIAN-",... OWN NOV 1» SAM MOM7•" M'O. NCRLAO•C.Pw •w 101T.O 6.AD •, ANDPAOPOR I 41010.° 4.99,41 c `P070MMILT\ a DDa 11 R. t� \ \\ • \\ I (L .'IA.D1�P.6 1011010 BAR 1ONw BA•BR MAK O 1A10490214 AT S � .00.10 O.1. ac.6a.K� •LW WOE 03 10•71.3 Or1411.7 77vra1on1 0611ewiD VICINITY MAP NOT TO WALE NORM [O•M OIO 00 Z. • 1001,4111 w•N,65.6A r-• OMAN - _ PACIFIC HUM SOUTH SITE PLAN - SITE PLAN 0■4. 1•.70.0' URB SECT ON CCALC 1 1/2' • I'•0• 9 SECMI RESERVED P)VKING Og• STATE PARKING PERMIT REQUIRED PANTED PCT.- 6KN 1tSL1t OACO4497.10 MIN Y00rE LETTERPG.. ...4.74.C•• YM4 WALL 01L7 PawTBO STEEL POW • LOCATE AT CENTER CP MALL HANDICAP STALL S GN NG SCALE 7b VW. OAR cut O1@AN 171,30 CON [7OMRLI0ER OAP r7 ti 70 40 Vc 11 1 - IS K. -OD 02/10/99 .°25_ C+4AD\9737SNAll\trl d•q TO NAPE INSTAL /I(B0 4100* 1 NEAAl.Y1w1..Lte.0Wtlllrylr/ 1. M14L.•I Rm.TO..tgoo C/0. MS a I.wN ` j1 IA4LRJPWOLWtM.WDRY1101 n4Wnt0u Ym �/t SL AMOYLIA1.1YWG.1 NN AMP.. 0 AM A► • 4 NALL.... V1Yba. RM14L AO NAM AT0111 ANAL /1111.1.100 iAAAW M. 41 C1.0f.LL [-011001IOV AD..Ll4M OR 44000.0 I.. Ao ARIA AN 111 00Iw PA.L. MTALCO.N0.1LLA4, It SAO RAM 1.1T4*t3 AO IAA.[PRr01 IROA OA144l.p4 10.4 Mw.t4d AO ltl55IOw .QY .•ono pANtl AG SLAG COM MP. 0CQ FLOOR PLAN 50411. 1/13'.1,1? wend 04.0151 0-0515 a-0MCM r laRfMAD Rl.114 M,R.T=P4. -MA 1.El A) CAW a4c a pw•M 140 a4w ITCM Q I]I..UIM 4141 112311G®IL I/LL 060]0 ream irama.0v tW mNRYQDI 1 p.TMI,'riTr.O1CYM14CMRAD.TI.TI ANNA. g1L41 lwiYl rN V.a N10111 AP AARRI..O.'R.,IIIe.L2D.PY. AS LA... *OA ►CM. 2 MP.. a NILp600a AO rr.l. OR RAJA NN MI= IDLOWL .1201A 0.45 CA. DOOR PAW MI= 5 14 11 WNW a 11.11 YO00. I. NAN AS 4 .dl' *X Tr AG 1020P MAMA ALLA/ A14I..Ie1r41.5 5 IA T. lrrI LAITAL COMIPA0m1NN 1OWKt4 RYA 1 111154.1►. 101. CLCXIL HANA.IRAClD. w41010•f. DO. CAP a r 44' e' 43• 4,000 5F. *201 44110E . (001 11100. .0JL11S• • P.O. eO0 SF. / LY.O . 0 OCCUPANTS 3200 Sr. / N00 . l =PANTS TOTAL 11-2a5inn EXe11.10 D00R REPAIR O' a 14' OR REPLACE YY N' 04044040 004044 EXISTIG 1114 DOOR MEYI ELECTRICAL SER/ICE (RE•C1RE At0 RE•1.ACE 0X101,1) 700 APPS • 211 MO VOLTS 3 PHASE 40RFT .1PC4ER COMPANY MCOFY GERMS. PROVIDE STEEL 01100141 COOK JOSS TO GIRT AIO&E SAMMEMEE I 004100 MLR PAT01.01@41 Lw11O COME ANAL ...L MOLD R14..D,GMRL 01 AL. 0l100 .114TOO..dN40.410. ] 4111000 ROO. AM MAR DV CON WY AAA GIT, 1:0 MIA OM MAE P.4. RYA MINA WACO AAA 014 to ru m Q.• M• IMALMEAAAA 44 VAMP SAV AA. ■00014044!111050 l N X6.0041.111 r. , A. AGA. .lTl1.0e. Y r wwlr6lME M V w p.Rw Ylll p To011nR1r. / PILED AMA 0. W 041A1 .W6..IlO1 P. IAN AI 01 10 NAM 44C0 4111Nn • . Cal RAMA 14441411 Cp.N.t0.1W NO RAT ClRAM11.260.1t41 VIM NA PANEL RMDOOr 11TV.ie Ilfe11 AO AD6! 40.. YIW.m 401 140 AAA Al DOA ,114101 MMSTp.Tpm A LL AND NAM .ROPES Ewe 1.5:101 PALER eLLLEM I .b Ym X114•N• 0C TO 1r AN M• ARIA 1.1 NM WA MAIM NKl]R.II.R MH4LM 2 Q1•T..IT 000e04mXY64 •N•0C 14151 TA T01rpNW AP m.tll Itt 1414 RAW I. 11.111E AAA. CANS AAA01.11004 VAL A. N. 0C 111 JANE PA OVAL 1.41. nr444L. LL AIMS MAN 00R01 1MOTOCOC RD(.RA OR .D 4111.01 1MmA • 441004 .110121. rumen rgsroux- °WAL LI eTO 1 SLAB • SCALD I HP MP e6. ANN x •154 MAT N41,/ 40104, MAME • M10 A1L. CAC ILIA o1 MOE °IN TERI2OR 1 DOOR JAMB • 1' 6. AP. TM ▪ I.LL ASWAN 4NIP. TO ovum LOCAXR ,CCTtoR OBE: !kr 1FR EE RESTROOM MAIMS • GA.. ]. UPPER CLOe! IO1•R4M TYPICAL DOOR /.w4Ge NM TO (GALE NORM ALL 51CN4(! T0MOWED GM .Trove AD[ Q DOOR PL4T0 LAM.4Te INCA AM /.r0o1 row 1De1r4TI041 AGM. AN RCA, HAIL ALL Rano) 41114 R4/eD MAUI CNARAGTERS =RCA WAX w4 5.15 ICAP RESTROOM SIGN r±•0 PLAN v. A. Vmo.E• IPOG AW O4 e0 MONO! m1LTASO CNlW AO.., ..IL.A MAW w aoTtlr. LOA SARA LE. T 1111,011 P.M 61T.e0• ,QL44.L 11.L0. MAI= PP MAIN. r4- a1..MGA ALL MANTA 11 n1.e4414L MLLLi AMA•I.•OG) 001 rwrt 141 °TYP I CAL I RESTROOM SECTION SECT w 3CCTION PLR[TDI/.D.41/ •A.50011R6 /lp•TI.OG W.115141AMMO' W Olt 54/40505 AAA IW1.NI A I.GE/ 02/10/99 1028 6n C.CAD \9737SXA \TINT - 2.(1.9 WA at PM= MIND KOMI AO tom nemucm fa MOM .o Part EAST ELEVATION 6ui.: V6•.r•r alb ME CCM ran NO1251 ELEVATION 6u 4c Vr.r•r 10,74 OSMIUM : Paws M.IY14ON Loa ro rr .01 ..1. 1a a. /011 Mon rarfD I Sr •IrMa Vend WOO Part 1pa1 1.1.41 .rue w• • r•e• EWMalwnan..namloa•. .0101u 4417/000 1'.C11. .o ran SOUTH ELEVATION 6G4 iauo•0rualtOV lnala AO Ode, .o ran IUEST ELEVATION v a • rd ry 6u4: i•r•r .CALL N• • r•• 0e/10/99 1009 on G\CAD\9737S.A\11 \11-3 a•p "SECTION" • • r•yM SECTION B -B WiaL r•Mr.. CMS r • x• SECTION C -C ecA.E r • x SECTION D -D SECTION G G SE r•Arr xue r • 34 SECTION E -E KAMr re 5ECTION F -F rcatr•ry SECTION H -N WALL r•re SECTION I -I erxer. x' �M M'IV.MR• JIM na. SEATTLE CITY N. 3 -23 • —rar• — t•—ur- /s3fir. +• INDUSTRIAL Si,- • x.,�N -couw NO I TATE • 1''• NY .. WAREHOUSING 1 INDUSTRIAL pry tp yifd • 11 ® ; INDUSTRIAL / ...\ 1 .INDUSTRIAL." __. - -__ rte_ \ - /•: • WAREHOUSI . or Jae•:u -c LAND USES MAP Z W 2 JU U0 co J CO LL 0 Q a I— W Z~ Wo w 0° w w. LL O U U` z Pacific Highway So. 1 m -� �\\ v \ C b II.p .41 d z__ •L9 Du ; worn 5h - . • . Z W re 6 JU 00 �w J H w0 QQ LL = a. �w Z' 1- 0 Z F- 0 0 S2 0 �. ww 1=—:— IL 0. Z W V =. 0H Z G • per ROS Y. 706/182 •O2 6 —10 . • —5—_ • - - — - - — - - -- --.._. 4 L• 0 4-" ----10 .. er .,,,,,, -___. , - .--.__ _ ---.. _ _ - ...I ;N. ov,;-;;" I! - PY-...... ■ ..•-,.. or i - --- -- - - —.. - — - - --. - N • , -...„ —41 ... _ -.41-- -,--___.... LEGAL O0SC4'PT1ON THAT PORTION Of COARNIIENT LOTS 9 AND 10 IN SECTION 4, TOMNSHM 23140779. RANGE 4(05T. WM. 0E50R8E2 AS MELONS, BEGINNING AT A PONT 414 THE WESTERLY VARGA Of EAST mARGINAL WAY 50.1714 7R0.4 7110 614400 THE PONT Of INTERSECTION OF SAIO WESTERLY 1/AR0N MTH THE SOUTH UNE Of SECTION 3. Of SAM 700445HP AND RANCE, BEARS 5110114 1517.30* EAST 1150.44 TEET: THENCE SOUTH 8556'00 WEST. ALONG THE NORTH UNE Of A CERT. PRiVATE ROADWAY, TO A PONT N DIE WESTERLY MARON Of STATE ROAD 120. 1 ANA 445. HIGHwAY 99 AND PAcmc TOGHWAY SOUTH, SNP PONT BENG CM • CURVE FAcu yw4104 THE 005700 cv THE CURVE BEARS NORTH 730473• wEST. A DISTANCE Of 165000 FEET AND TNE TRUE PLACE Of BEONSING Of TH15 DESORPTION. 111E.140E ALONG SAID CURK 10 THE TETT AND SAM IJARDN TO A P0147 04 A UNE PARALLEL TO AND 1800 FEET FROM MEASURED Al 71017 ANGLES TO THE 50)70 UNE Of 5010 5001104 4. THENCE ALONG SAD PARALLEL ONE SOUTH 197917' WEST TO THE BANN Cf 7745 DuwAIMSH MAR; D■ENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT BANN TO A P0•4T TROIA 224104 THE TRUE P0117 Of BEGNNING BEARS SOWN 8579'11' EAST, THENCE SOUTH 857911 EAST TO THE TRUE PONT Of 1300510140. BASIS 00 ELEVATION, Oty ot Sean. DMIC2MOM I 192 - Amin of south mwl 6' concrete totem:mg 401 • stll ono Amon perVno lot • Akio NoMcM St. k across Wm,. AcsocIotod Grove. porting .1 to A k B Budelwg* - ELEVATION 203.8 411 (NAM) 68) Conyers:al horn NAOS 1:18 to NAVO 29 Is In lonoss: NAM) 86 m.o. 360 Net w NAIR) 29 8*30,0*940. 9547309002. 1444 101/102 ' ImmtwihWIMIIIMIIIINMIIIIN • 4411MnintriltiMM!s R.-les000 l.3p1.74 • , '5; EIV tt t1 Pacific Hwy South • tR 14 51 oi 49' 17 41 .7km AA, """' GRAPHIC SCALE 1 4*17) 1.• AO Is - - - L....ESELD7 CoAmte 1.1 Cos* ▪ kloncecekt X Tock Net MO • EtrocuLT 0.7 o 5.0 moor w/cao 623604 • round v. or r•wor O 2 • 3 wIN lock .k O 060 zr *AN. wk. Pow 0.1040vs Trot • Erm9men Tree ▪ Cetch BoMn • LIon H. Gas 110.0 • Nolo Vo211 *Crw fmn• Ytate YoIre Try OW. ••■• .13 •oler rnetr ---• wan • Dokl Noo. Artn,12212 12720 GolowN 01. Suit. 116 5•211w. wA Schroeter gi Surveying PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS •0 be• SPON/St WC...NOP ITN, Ital, PTINI41 PAS TOPP.I.INTO (IkELD)lopyso JOB I 328/1 DATE (010100) 10/18/90 PROJECT 740. 95012 SCALE 1' . 20' 01*0 80 40. 1 S(C. -E.—