Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L99-0020 - SEGALE BUSINESS PARK BLDG 982 - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
L99 -0020 SEGALE BUSINESS PARK #982 18500 Southcenter Pkwy. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000 July 6, 1999 Mr Steve Nelson LaPianta Limited Partnership PO Box 88028 Tukwila WA 98138 Dear Mr Nelson: RECEIVED J111_, 0 S 1999 COMMUNITY DENELOPMENI Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L99 -0020 SEGALE BUSINESS PARK (AKA LaPIANTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 1999 -NW -10055 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to construct an office building of 16,800 sq ft at the Segale Business Park, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on June 21, 1999. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day appeal period, July 12, 1999. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, Alice Kelly, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program AMK: amk SDP.DOC cc: Steve Lancaster, City of Tukwila 0 A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N C. An-13 LO M6 hereby declare that: ONotice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fPlanning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet a Notice of Shoreline 3( Shoreline Application for Management Permit Management Permit Determination of Non - significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (1 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action fl Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on �l,14 . Name of Project 4ch 7 File Number 2_61q-00.14) 49a Signature -4/13/( 0644-. CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS 4 ft : V&A Kc,.,4wog Ke , ?.C• (V') U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( V DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. 4' C✓) NIt,Cc 000 t.a,.ih U ct. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL ( 1,TUXWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ).CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ( U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C : WP51DATA \ CHKL I ST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. DEPT OF PARKS HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LO • AGENCIES * IAA SU 54titt (Y) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDIA W. V O'. CO W = Nu_ .WO _ d. Z Z 0' la -- W' H• Z, Z5 U =' O z t, • Gaco Wester 9(‘ PO Box 8 08 SeattlelA 98138 ar / +-A /40vvv�t4/ ( - L UU 0 vyviS General Medical Corporation 18325 Segale Park Drive "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Tractor Parts PO Box 88753 Tukwila, WA 98138 Mitchell Moving & Storage La Pianta Li • d- Partnership 18800 Southcenter Parkway POD 028 Seattle, WA 98188 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 Gaco Western, Inc. PO..Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 Bruce & Elizabeth Mitchell P.O. Box 99151 Seattle, WA 98199 Schoenbachle ttrpr LIc 13256 fie up Way #11 Belt6Iiue, WA 98005 City of Kent 220 4th Ave S. Kent, WA 98032 Schoenbachler Enterprises 6728 - 134th Ct. NE Redmond, WA 98052 Southcenter Golf 18791 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 RTS Packaging 18340 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Bruce & Elizabethlllitchell 19000 57th'15L NE Se es;WA 98155 Z CC Z 0 0 moo: w = J H. w 0. J; a. w Z moo" Z.�- N 0 w IU;. Uu --1 z. Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Planning.Commission Agenda Pkt Short Subdivision Agenda :Shoreline Mgmt ,Permit FAX To Seattle Times Cl assifi eds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO. Box 70 = ..Seattle WA 98111 Determination of Non - Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Notice.of Action Official Notice Notice. of Application Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Other 604/ fn %'G4f' as ma i I ed ' to each of the addresses listed on this 2 o rY day of Jv ear 20.fl( Project Name: Project Number: L99 -00 0. Pet-ae— "At 801 # geral Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing C P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM in the Shor'e i n Management. Act of 1971 PERMIT FOP P SHORELINE M ir :ME Pr SUBSTANTIAL LE V E .P E wT File Number: L99 -0020 Status: APPRO \ /ED Applied: 03/12/1999 Approved 06/17/1999 Expiration: 06/16/2001 Pursuant to RCW 90.53, a permit is hereby granted to: SEGALE BUSINESS PARK to under take the following development: SHORELINE PERMIT FOR 16,300 'SO. FT. OFFICE BLDG upon the following property: Address: 18500 SOUTHCEN T ER PY Parcel No: 352304 -9116 _rer. /Twn /RnQe: THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA. OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN (URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master" pr'ogr'am provisions are applicable to this development: De'e lcpment pur'su in.i to this, permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the attached terms and Conditions: : This permit is granted pursuant to the 'Shoreline Management Act of 1.911 an nothing .1n this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinance_. or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline ManagementAct (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.53A40(8) in the event the perm i ttee f a i l s to Comp l v with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BE ;SIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) 'DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58. 140(6) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDING'S INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF D�Y_l _H FILING HtV E TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW L0. Wit . 1 40 l 5> ( a ) ( A) ( c ) I ^ 19 5 Steve Lancaster Director, Planning Department. Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two _n'ear's from date of issuance, per. WAC 17.3 -14 -060, Z W 6 -J U0 CO 0 J1.- W O}. a IS. F_W z= I-- O Z D. UO '0 -, 0 =U W O w Z UN Z June 19, 2001 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mr. Steven R. Nelson Segale Business Park P. O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 RE: Request for Extension of Shoreline Substantial Development Permit L99 -0020 Dear Steve: This letter is in response to your request, dated June 15, 2001 to receive a one year extension on the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, L99 -0020, approved effective June 21, 1999. The State Shoreline Management Act requires development authorized under a shoreline substantial development permit to commence within two years of the effective date of the permit. However, RCW 90.58.143 (2) authorizes local government to grant one extension for not more than one year on a shoreline substantial development permit if that request for extension is received prior to the expiration date of the permit. RCW 90.58.143 (2) also requires that notice of the proposed extension be given to parties of record for the original shoreline permit and the Department of Ecology. This notice is provided by copy of this letter. Your request for a one year extension is approved. No additional extensions may be requested. Construction activities shall be commenced prior to June 21, 2002. If you have any questions, please call me at 206 - 431 -3670. Sincerely, WY Steve Lancaster, Director Department of Community Development cc: File: L99 -0020 Department of Ecology — Shorelands Attorney General's Office Parties of Record c: \mydocs\segale- ollice \shorcl ine- extension.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 � `� SEGALE BUSINESS PARK A LA PIANTA LLC TRADE NAME June 15, 2001 Ms. Carol Lumb, AICP Associate Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: City of Tukwila Shoreline Permit L99 -0020 Segale Business Park Building 982 18500 Southcenter. Parkway Dear Ms. Lumb: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER Please issue a one year extension of the above captioned Shoreline Permit for the above captioned Building. The prospective tenant for which the building was originally designed is no longer in the market for this sort of facility. However, we have located another potential tenant for the building and need the additional time to review the project with this tenant. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Very truly yours, SEGALE BUSINESS PARK Steven R. Nelson PO Box 88028 • Tukwila,WA 98138 -2028 18000 Andover Park W • Suite 200 • Tukwila, WA 98188 -4798 Telephone 206 575 -2000 • Fax 206 575 -1837 • Z 1. = r' ▪ w 2 • 6D o O' co o W =; LL uj CJ ww v', ;.0 I -. • Z; • z • CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98133 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 AFFIDAVIT OF ItiSTALLATION AND pOSTII\ G OF PUBLIC LN-F'ORMATIOti SIGH (S) JUN 2 8 1999 COMMUNITY DEVEio:)PMENT State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I 4.ue \'J4Ecs (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on (/7i' I 7, the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at &500 h e c-- ,i-e.v- so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number 2 '• GOV 6 Affiant (Applicant Signature) SUBSCRIBED ANE . •� /' . s Ff ,1 •• �,. g,1Ory k••' ''g , g., 19 77 i < �DTAR� .. • NOTARY PUB in and the State of Washington . ; ... 0 , • ■ ;1. p L B L� t 1,1 residing at �% � °i� 'tr,; 41 y • �, .2 o o? a �0° •s My .commission expires on �� s City of Tukvvila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Notice of Decision June 25, 1999 To: Applicant Parties of Record This notice is to confirm the decision reached by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review on Thursday, June 24, 1999. The Board of Architectural Review voted to approve the design of a .16,800 square foot office building and the landscaping plan based on the findings and conclusion in the staff report dated June 17, 1999. This letter is issued pursuant to the Permit Application Types and Procedures, Tukwila Municipal Code Zoning Chapter, (18.104.170) on the following project and permit approvals. Project File Number: L99 -0019, Design Review Application Associated Files: L99 -00020 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) & E99 -0009 (SEPA determination) Applicant: Steve Nelson for Segale Business Park Request: Construct a 16,800 sq. ft. office building within 200 feet of the shoreline. The project is subject to design review. Location: 18500 Southcenter Parkway SEPA Determination: DNS Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Boulevard., Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday; 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m. The planner managing the project is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 431 -3661 for further information. This decision may be appealed to the Tukwila City Council pursuant to TMC 18.104.010 E. by filing a Notice of Appeal within 21 calendar days from the date of the issuance of this Notice of Decision (TMC 18.116.010). Information on the content of the Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Department of Community Development at the address noted above. c: \carol \Segale - office \notdec.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 A F F I D A V I T /Wei 0 Notice of Public Hearing E] Notice of Public Meeting OBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet [1]Board of Appeals Agenda Packet flPlanning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: .Lj Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Shoreline Management Permit ElDetermination of Non- , significance LI Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice ONotice of Action Official Notice El Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on +`A- 181 Wig Name of Project File Number t,L WI 418 Signature z . x ,-- mow= 6 D` 0 0, .0 Cl w w J F' w 0' g J' lL � ICI z I- 0, Z I- LL 2 j U 0. 0( CI I- w 1=- u ui U . z Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 Date of Transmittal: 6 -18 -99 Type of Permit: Substantial Development Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Name: LaPianta Limited Partnership dba Segale Business Park Address P. O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 Is the applicant the property owner? Yes 1:ieceivED JUN 2 2 1999 To: Department of Ecol O NW Regional Office 3190 160th Avenue S.E. T Bellevue, WA 98008 -5452 Date of Receipt: Applicant's Representative: Name: Steve Nelson (206) 575 -2000 Location of the property: 18500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila; SW 1/4 35 -23 -04 Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban RECEIVED JUN 21 1999 DEPT OF ECOLOGY Description of Project: Construct a 16,800 square foot office building a small portion of which falls within 200 feet of the shoreline. Notice of Application Date: April 14, 1999 Final Decision Date: June 17, 1999 By: Carol Lumb, Associate Planner, City of Tukwila Phone Number: (206) 431 -3661 c:\ carol\segale- office\shorecov.doc z .mow cc JU 00. co 0 cn w, w= co II; J � W D'. ga �. Da = ci • w r Z I— 0. Z --. LU U� ;o -' o� w w o: wz U N� 0 CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS C.`) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ( ( ( ( OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES Plitusk 6, ( (sill ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ( ( ( ( U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) ( ) POLICE ( ) ( ) PLANNING ( ) ( )'PARKS & REC. ( ) ( ) CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ),,SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (✓) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE (Vr DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WP51DATA \CHKLIST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. (N DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV (‘/T DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ctSo nufu v+at, Itvaltaru ., - ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL. t, ✓) 11"•• -C. LUtW,r ? LiftfAt P&onecto /Lse.vu—s BCHOOLS /LIBRARIES HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES i.12/g6 or-t- h, Olkt CQ.cw(C.— D s*.6 r ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE HEIM Q -..spL4/.( a .: pov h vY City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Lancaster, Director FM: Carol Lumb, Associate Planner RE: Shoreline Permit: L99 -0020, Segale Business Park Building 982 Office Building Date: June 17, 1999 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves the construction of a 16,800 square foot two -story office building on a 2.2 -acre site. A small portion of the building and parking lot lies within Tukwila's Shoreline Overlay District as the site abuts the Green River, a shoreline of the State. Construction will occur on the front portion of the site (1.4 acres) with the rear 34,765 square feet or .80 acres left for future development. The vacant area will continue to be used to stockpile gravel. Attachment A is a copy of the site plan; Attachment B is a copy of the landscaping plan. A 3,344 square foot single story office building currently exists on the site; this building will be demolished after the new building is completed. 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The City's Shoreline Master Plan establishes three management zones adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Zone: An impact buffer area which provides for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. Low Impact Zone: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. High Impact Zone: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z W. re .J U' 00 Wo: Ili i` J H w: w0 g Ji LL < co =d w z�. z o tu 0: 0 H; u- O; • • ill Z' co O z k, y L99 -0020: Segale Business ark Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below along with a discussion of the proposed project. City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: Overall Goals: 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Maintain a high quality of environment along the shoreline of Tukwila. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. z z 1.1 6 J U 0 co U wz J I- N LL. Ili O: u.? -d =w z� I— O Z F- w U • 0 O U, ra w• w Response: The proposed project is to construct a 16,800 square foot two -story office 1J-- o' building. The project is located in an area of the City designated on the Comprehensive o Plan Map for Heavy Industrial activity and is taking place on a parcel of land located an industrial park. Adjacent land uses consist of an asphalt plant on the north, Southcenter o z Parkway on the west with low density residential across the street, a manufacturing company office and warehouse on the south and the Green River and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers levee on the east. The Green River Trail is located across the river. Given the nature of the development, the project will promote economic development in the City, which is one aspect of enhancing the public interest. The office building is setback over 180 feet from the levee. The project will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. The construction of the office building is an exercise of property rights on this site. No culturally significant features have been identified on the site. The project will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. Public access to the river is available on the opposite side of the river from this project on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. Economic Development Element Goals: 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. c :\ carol \segale- office\shorerpt.doc 2 L99 -0020: Segale Business nark Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is enhanced. 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with shoreline goals and policies. Response: As noted above, the project will construct 16,800 square feet of office space. The project will generate construction jobs during the time the building is under construction and permanent employment for approximately 20 to 40 people and to that extent enhances the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila. The proposed building is a permanent structure and will result in long -term benefits to the City and the economic health of the shoreline. Public Access Element Goals: 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of Tukwila..... 4. Encourage public access to privately owned shorelines, consistent with private property rights. 5. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. Response: The goals of this section relate to providing public access to the river. There is a public trail system that runs the length of the Green River. In this portion of the river, the trail is located on the opposite side of the river, so the general public will not have access to the river from this site. An outdoor picnic area for on -site employees will be provided, although it will be located adjacent to the building rather than on the levee system. Circulation Element Goals: The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads or public facilities within the shoreline. Access for vehicles to either side of the office building is from Southcenter Parkway /57th Avenue South. No parking is provided in the rear of the building. A portion of the southeast corner of the parking lot is located in the High Impact Environment of the shoreline. c:\ carol \segale - office\shorerpt.doc 3 .z �tu • re 2 , CO 0 w= J F—` CO LL : too gQ co 3 F- w _ z �. I-o z • ~' 0 co o = U. LL O uiz; z • L99 -0020: Segale Business urk Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Recreational Element Goals: 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. z 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the , s r shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. c u6D Response: A public trail system runs along the Green River, alternating sides of the river -Ji vo on which it is located. On this section of the river, the trail is located on the opposite side co o of the river. w z _11._ u) O. w Shoreline Use Element Goals: g J 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the = a. quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. M- i 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development z i.- along the river. z � ILI Ill . D o` Response: An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee has been constructed along the c) to eastern portion of the site. The property is currently developed with a 3,450 square foot ,o ~' office building that will remain in use until the new office building is completed. The w w proposed use is a permitted use within the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations of () Heavy Industrial. LI O El Z` U =: O Ht Conservation Element Goals: 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. Response: The natural character of the river in the area of the proposed project has been altered to a major extent due to the construction of the levee to provide flood protection. It has been determined that the proposed building does not impact the stability of the levee. Landscaping will be added on the landward side of the levee to soften the visual impacts of the development of the office building on users of the river trail on the opposite side of the river. c: \carol\segale -of ce\shorerpt.doc 4 z L99 -0020: Segale Business , ,.rk Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Landscaping along the levee has been coordinated with the Corps of Engineers to address concerns that agency had about trees with large root systems being located in or adjacent to the levee prism. As a result, the type of tree to be planted in the landscaping area has been revised from a Thuja Hogan (Western Cedar) to the Honey Locust tree, and grass will be used as ground cover rather than planting Rubus Calcinoides as originally proposed. The landscaping will enhance the aesthetic value of the shoreline. Additional landscaping is being provided within the Low Impact Environment to provide additional screening of the development from the river. 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Heavy Industrial. Offices are a permitted use in that zone. The Tukwila Board of Architectural will review the project at a public hearing to consider the design of the building and the landscaping plan. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 2, above is a discussion of the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. As only the front portion of the site is being developed currently, most of the construction area lies outside all the shoreline environments. The rear portion of the site is currently used to stockpile gravel; this use will continue until additional development occurs. A small portion of the proposed building is located in the High Impact Environment, which permits all uses permitted in the underlying zone. Only the dumpster is located within the Low Impact Environment. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; c:\ carol \segale - office\shorerpt.doc 5 z ~w IY 2 00 W = J (` w0 I Q. _a �w z F• o. z 1-. w U 0. 0 —: 01 = U. .z w 0 =. z L99 -0020: Segale Business nark Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: The construction activity on this site will take place from approximately 80 to 180 feet from the levee and will take place completely outside the River Environment. Any existing vegetation in the River Environment will not be disturbed. Honey locust trees and native grass will be planted in the Low Impact Environment, just outside a 30- foot easement that has been granted to King County for access to the levee for maintenance purposes. As noted above, the type of tree to be planted has been coordinated with the Corps of Engineers to ensure compatibility with the existing levee system. Additional landscaping has been provided in the Low Impact Environment for additional screening. 5. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River, which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Storm water will be discharged to the P -17 basin. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be altered by the construction of this project. With the addition of additional landscaping in the Low Impact Environment, there may be an improvement of wildlife habitat over what currently exists landward of the levee. 8. All perimeters of landfills or other landforms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Response: A land altering permit will be required for this project. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be installed to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed prior to discharge of the storm water to the P -17 basin. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. c:\ carol \regale -offs ce\shorerpt. do c ' 6 tozeoN L99 -0020: Segale Business rark Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: No federal permits are required, although the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the project to ensure that construction of the office building does not impact the stability of the levee. The State Department of Ecology will review the shoreline permit. King County Water and Land Resources Division has provided comments on the project. These comments were addressed in the SEPA staff report. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is involved with this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: The dumpster for the office building is located at the southeast edge of the Low Impact Environment. 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Response: No property is proposed for acquisition with this project. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. Response: This project does not propose any landfilling within the river channel. 15. ... (R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: There are no cottonwood trees existing on the site. c:\ carol \segale- office\shorerpt.doc { z • :+-Z • oC� ti o • . No; �w W= W O• • u_ <' 1.-. z o; ww .2 U� O N ww ui �- - O. ui Z .H H. O L99 -0020: Segale Business'rurk Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. Uses in the River Environment are restricted to such uses as footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The River Environment on this site ends approximately 5 -8 feet from the landward catch point of the levee. No improvements or development are proposed within the River Environment on this site. The applicant is proposing to plant Honey Locust trees at 30 feet on center intervals along with native grass, just outside the 30 foot easement granted to King County as required by this section of the Shoreline Overlay district. The landscaping plan has been revised, dated 3/12/99, to reflect an increase in the amount of landscaping in the Low Impact Environment to provide additional screening of the site and enhance the shoreline environment. Attachment C illustrates several shoreline cross sections of the site. C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the river environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking /loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. The enclosed dumpster is located within the low impact environment on this site. TMC 18.44.140 B. states: Low impact environment uses shall conform to the following standards: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations; Response: The Heavy Industrial zone requires 12.5 feet of landscaping on the front of the site. No landscaping is required on the sides or in the rear of the site in this zone. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan, which indicates landscaping on the front, as well as landscaping around the office building. The landscaping in the front will be significantly larger than the required 12.5 feet as the front landscaping will be placed in the area occupied by the current office building after it is demolished. The landscaped area will be approximately 75' by 155', with a large grassy area in the front and over 12.5 feet of formal landscaping. Landscaping is provided at each end of the parking areas as well. 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking /loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; c:\ carol \segale - office\shorerpt.doc 8 z 1_ z QQ• 6 J 0 O 0 co w= J l- CO u_ w O. LLQ co 0. • w z� F— 0' Z I— w uj 2 • is 0 =. C:1 F- 111 u• d LI Z =' ~ _ O z L99 -0020: Segale Business lark Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: Access to the building is provided by Southcenter Parkway /57th Avenue South with internal vehicle circulation coming from the south and traveling around the rear of the building to the north parking stalls. This internal circulation system is located more than 10 feet from the building. An access road for maintenance of the levee system is located along the top of the levee. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six -foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d. Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: A cyclone fence with slats is proposed to run the length of the eastern side of the site where it abuts the site being developed with the warehouse. This will provide some screening of the project in this portion of the Low Impact Environment. For the remainder of the eastern portion of the site along the river, honey locust trees and native grass will be planted along the river at the edge of River Environment for screening and aesthetic purposes. This area has been enlarged to provide additional screening of the site. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking /loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. 4: COMMENTS: Comments were received during the Notice of Application period from the King County Water and Land Resources Division. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was asked to review the concerns in the County's letter (Attachments D, and E, respectively). The issues raised in the County's letter were addressed through the analysis of environmental impacts of the proposed project in the SEPA staff report. The Corps response raises a concern with the location of the landscape plantings. The landscaping plan has been revised to reflect this concern. Copies of the comment letters are attached. The Corps has no objections to this project. c:\ carol\segale- oflice\shorerpt.doc 9 L99 -0020: Segale Business rack Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 5. SEPA: A determination of non - significance was issued on June 9, 1999. The appeal period closed on June 23, 1999; no appeals or comments were received on the DNS. A copy of the SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment F). CONCLUSIONS 1. The project site is designated Heavy Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Heavy Industrial. The proposed office building project is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use, a 16,800 square foot office building is consistent with adjacent land uses. These uses consist of an asphalt plant on the north, Southcenter Parkway on the west and low density residential development across the road, a manufacturing company office and warehouse on the south and the Green River and an Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee on the east. 3. The project will promote economic development in the City and will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. 4. There are no culturally significant features on the site. Development of the site will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. 5. Public access is available on the opposite side of the river from this project on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: A. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. B. No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; C. The project will not disrupt existing trees or vegetation within the river environment. No cottonwood trees within the river environment or low impact environment will be removed. D. No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be discharged into the P17 drainage basin. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be used to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. E. All state and federal water quality regulations will be strictly complied with. F. Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project G. All necessary permits will be obtained for the project. H. No dredging or mining will occur with the project. I. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. J. No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. c:\ carol\segale- office\shorerpt.doc 10 L99 -0020: Segale Business rark Building 982 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. Landscaping, as required by this section, is being provided at the edge of the river environment outside the 30 -foot easement granted to King County consisting of Honey Locust trees and native grass. A revised landscaping plan, dated 3/12/99, provides additional landscaping to screen the site and enhance the shoreline environment. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment. A. The structure is sited according to the Heavy Industrial zone in which it is located. Landscaping is provided according to the requirements of that zone, with over 12.5 feet in the front as well as landscaping around the office building. The landscaping along the river consists of honey locust trees located 30 feet on center with native grass planted in a five foot area just outside both the River Environment and 30 foot easement dedicated to King County for maintenance of the levee. B. Parking, loading and storage facilities will be screened from the river in the following ways: a cyclone fence with slats will run along the eastern side of the site (approximately 100 feet) where the site adjoins the property being developed with the warehouse. Honey locust trees and native grass will be planted just outside the River Environment. C. No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Comments were received from King County Water and Land Resources Division on the project during the Notice of Application comment period. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was asked to respond to the issue of levee stability raised by the County. Issues raised by these comments were addressed in the SEPA staff report. The Corps has no objections to this project. The landscaping plan has been revised to address the concerns raised by the Corps. 10. A determination of non - significance was issued on June 9, 1999; no appeals were filed by the June 23, 1999 deadline. 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the shoreline substantial development permit. c :\ carol \segale- office\shorerpt.doc 11 z z'• w' re U0: tnw w = J 1 ' W0 o g- u- I" d. z_ I-- o z r, uj ?o' U 0 to CI I— w w. 6 O .:z. UN - z 06/11/99 11:35 FAX 206 764 3319 EMERG MGMT REPLV TO ATTENTION O► Q002 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124-1255 Emergency Management Branch 11 Jun 1999 Mr. Dave Clark Manager, Rivers Section .King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, Washington 98104 -5022 Dear Mr. Clark: Thank you for affording us the opportunity to review the proposed office building development to be located adjacent to the . authorized levee at the Segale Business Park in Tukwila, Washington. We have reviewed the proposed project and the only concerns that we have are with the landscaping details. The Segale levee is part of the Federally authorized flood control project that was mostly constructed by the Seattle. District Corps of Engineers and turned over to the City of Tukwila on May 15, 1992, following a joint final inspection. The proposal to place plantings in the levee prism as shown on drawing dated 3/18/99, sheet L1 of 1, is not acceptable. No plantings other than sod will be permitted on the levee prism. The issue of oversteepened levee slopes raised by King County Water and Land Resources Division has been discussed with the former Study Manager for the section 205 project and with members of Emergency Management Branch. The consensus is that because this work involved only raising the top of the levee a maximum of about 1.5 feet,'it would have been prohibitively expensive to require that the entire riverward slope be re- graded to a more stable 2 horizontal on 1 vertical slope. 06/11/99 11:36 FAX 206 764 3319 EMERG MGMT Ij003 If you have any questions please contact Bill Garrott at (206) 764 -3406 or Monte Kaiser at (206) 764 - .3712. Sincerely,' Paul E. Komoroske, P.E. Chief, Emergency Management Branch Cc:'Caro1 Lumb, Planner, City of Tukwila City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director JUNE 10, 1999 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Steve. Nelson, for Segale Business Park has filed an application for Design Review, File Number L99 -0019, to construct a 16,800 square foot office building. A small portion of the proposed office building is located within the shoreline of the Green River. You are invited to comment on the design of the project at a public hearing scheduled for June 24, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. before the Board of Architectural Review. The hearing will take place at City Hall in the City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. To confirm the time and date before the hearing, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Permits applied for include: • Design Review (L99 -0019) • Shoreline Substantial Development (L99 -0020) • SEPA Checklist (E99 -0009) Other known required permits include: • Land Altering Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. c: \carol\Segale- office \pubnot.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax. (206) 4313665 z _I ' ~w. re J U. 00• . �0. • w= J I... co LL w 0: J u. (t' co �w I— 0 Z I— w •0u' ❑ 11J ijj u. 0. Z1 lii U tn' .0 z CITY OF TUt:WILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR 16,500 S0. FT. OFFICE BLDG PROPONENT: STEVE NELSON FOR SEGALE BUSINESS LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING �T EE,T<-ADi REZs.t IF ANY: ADDRESS: 1 8500' <,;OUTHCENTER PY PARCEL NO: 35�231:4 =1I6: SEC : /TWNIRNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY. OF _ TUKWILA' 99'-.0009 The City has 'determi ned that the ' pr 6posa i does not have a probable significant ,adverse impact op?`: the environment. An .environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43:21c._030(2)(c) . This decision 'was made after~ review of a completed environmental` chec 1 ist .'and other information on file with the had agency. This information is available to the public on request. k'kkkk *'k*;64;iFkkA:. _. 4 determination is final and signed this 1. day :;of, .Steve •.Ler, Cast'er�'.,.Respansibie Official City cif. TO. wiia, (206) 431 =3170 6300 Southc,e:nter Boulevard Tukwila,: WA;- 98.188;.._ Copies of the ''p`i;o,cedures for SEPA -appea T s are ava i T ab l e -with the Department of COMM-Unity Developwer MEMORANDUM June 9, 1999 To: Steve Lancaster, Director Fm: Carol Lumb, Associate Planner Re: Project File No. E99-0009: Sega le Office Building 982 Project Description: Remove an existing 3,344 square foot single story office building and construct a 16,800 square foot two-story office building. A small portion of the building and parking lot lies within the Shoreline Overlay District as the site is adjacent to the Green River, a shoreline of the state. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs along the riverward side of the site. The existing office building will remain in place until construction of the new office building is completed. Proponent: LaPianta Limited Partnership dba Segale Business Park Location: 18500 Southcenter Parkway Date prepared: May 21, 1999 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology ATTACHMENT F • .z Z 21" 6 = :0 0: 0! w WI ujo g 2 a in a '2. a :m h In a • • 0 w OL z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) Existing Environmental Information: • EIS for Segale Business Park, 1974 • Geotechnical Report (12/9/98, 4/15/99) and River Bank Stabilization Study (2/25/99): Geo Engineers, Inc. Comments on SEPA Checklist: Page 5, #5b. Since the time the SEPA checklist was prepared, the Puget Sound Chinook salmon has been listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service as a threatened species. This species is found in the Green River. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth The soils at the proposed building site are silty sands and gravels. The site is flat with an approximately 2 percent grade. Approximately 200 cubic yards of fill will be required to establish the building pad and surrounding driving surfaces. The applicant proposes to use material from the foot excavations for this fill. As part of the shoreline permit process, the applicant submitted a geotechnical analysis showing that the integrity of the levee will not be compromised by the proposed project. The analysis states "(t)he proposed grading operations at the site will be limited to the inland side of the levee and will increase grades in the building area by approximately 3 feet. No grade changes are anticipated within about 60 feet of the levee." The analysis concludes: "In our opinion, placement of the proposed fill will not adversely effect the levee. In addition, based on the information provided and our understanding of existing conditions and past improvements, it is our opinion that the existing levee slopes are presently stable and adequately protected and do not require additional protection. If the site elevations or slopes are changed from those shown on the sections provided and c: \carol /Segale- Office /sepa -rpt 2 z . ' Wiz. re w. J O • UO U 0: U W� W =I J f'< w O:. Q; • d _. z� F- a •z Ir. • U : U, • ,01—; W W —O • • ui z' • .017' z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 discussed above, we should be consulted regarding potential effects on the levee." Comments were received from King County Division of Water and Land Resources. The County stated it had "...significant concerns with the oversteepened slope angles along the riverward embankments of the existing levee." The cross section drawings provided by the applicant show the angle of the levee as ranging from 1.32H:1V to 1.37H:1 V. The preferred angle is 2:1. The County believes that levee improvements to this portion of the levee in 1989 were to be constructed at 2H:1V slope, instead of the angels shown on the cross sections. Nut- : w p. The County's letter, dated May 14,,1999 commenting on the project requests N D; that: I W • Sufficient site area be preserved to permit establishing an overall slope z 1-; gradient of 2:1 on the riverward side of the levee should there be an 1- O z'-: opportunity to reconstruct the levee in the future; and w ui • Sufficient area be preserved to provide for establishment of a 15 -foot D o wide levee maintenance access roadway along the top crest of the levee p N ;o'- slope. _ = V' (- Based on the information presented by the applicant and a review by Public u. to Works staff it appears that the stability of the levee is not an issue for this w z. project and that sufficient area exists currently to access the levee for 0 _: maintenance. O f-' z Building, parking lot, driveways and sidewalks will cover approximately 64% of the site. Filter media will be used at all existing catch basins, as required by the King County Surface Water Design Manual, to control storm water siltation prior to discharge into existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed as a requirement of the construction. Air Normal emissions and dust associated with use of construction equipment will occur during construction of the project. After construction, normal exhaust associated with vehicular traffic will occur. Water trucks will be used during construction. All equipment will meet local, state, and federal emission standards. c: \carol/Segale- Off ice /sepa -rpt SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Sega le Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 Water The Green River abuts the site on the south and east sides of the project site. The project is subject to the State Shoreline Management Act since a corner of the building, landscaping, driveways and parking area fall within 200 feet of the shoreline. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water, nor will there be any surface water or ground water withdrawals or diversions. The project site does not lie within a 100 -year floodplain. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters will occur. The office /warehouse will be connected to the City of Tukwila's sewage system. Runoff from the parking areas and building roof will be collected in onsite catch basins and flow by gravity to the existing City of Tukwila storm water system. The site is within the P -17 basin. Oil/water separators will be installed on site to minimize water quality impacts from parking areas. On -site detention will be required prior to any discharge into the P -17 basin. Plants A landscaped area in the front of the existing building is in place. Landscaping will be provided at the front of the site and around the proposed new building. A fence exists on the south side of the property. The applicant proposes to retain the fence along with the existing aggregate rock, which forms a 4 -foot border between the parking curbing and the fence. Landscaping will be planted landward of the levee within the River Environment of the Shoreline, as required by the Tukwila Shoreline Overlay District. The King County Water and Land Resources Division provided the following comment on landscaping of the site: • All landscaping plantings should be consistent with cross section dimensions and construction details and policies set forth in Corps of Engineers' Publication EM 1110 -2 -301, dated February 28, 1999. In a meeting held on April 16, 1999, on a related project (Segale Building 981, warehouse with associated office and maintenance facilities) the COE stated that grass should be planted on the riverward side of the levee and that at some future time, willows or other trees would be planted on the riverward side, should there be a need to reconstruct the levee. Currently, no room exists for a landscape bench on the riverward side of the levee. The COE expressed concerns about the type of tree proposed for the landscape area at the landward toe of the levee; as a result, the tree type has been revised from a cedar to a 4 c: \caroUSegale- Office /sepa -rpt z =Z UO 6 NCI: W =. w o: a` =d z� �o z1- 0 in 0 F—: =U IL Z N' O 1- z SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 Honey Locust tree. Native grass will be planted as ground cover. This type of tree has been approved by the COE. Animals The SEPA Checklist notes that songbirds, ducks, crows and Canadian geese have been observed on or near the site. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway migration route. The only mammals observed on the site have been rodents. While the Checklist states that no fish have been observed, the National Marine Fisheries Service has recently listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. This species is known to inhabit the Green River. The King County Water and Land Resources Division provided the following comment: • To the extent that construction, excavation, and/or landscape plantings may be proposed within the existing River Protection Easement for the levee, it would appear the project proposal is clearly subject to the provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act. Federal agencies are required to consult for any action that "will likely affect" a listed species. Currently, there are no local, State or Federal regulations that require revisions to this project related to the ESA. Energy/Natural Resources Electricity and natural gas will be used in the building for heating and other uses normal for offices. Diesel fuel will be used in construction equipment during construction. The project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. The building will be designed to meet the Washington State Energy Code to save energy in heating and cooling the structure. Environmental Health No special emergency services will be required as a result of the proposed project. Noise is generated by traffic along the street in front of the site and the close proximity of an asphalt plant to the north. Construction noise will occur during regular hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Noise from vehicles once the building is open for business, approximately 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. All equipment will be operated with required local, state, and federal noise suppression devices. 5 c: \carol/Segale- Office /sepa -rpt z ,- W. u6= JU O 0 w =. J • u. wo J w ¢. c a, = w' H =. z w uj w w. H V `. _ z• • H O 1 z. SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 Land/Shoreline Uses z The site is currently developed with a 3,450 square foot, one story office z building. This building will remain in operation until construction is completed on the new building and then it will be demolished. The new building will be v two story and contain 16,800 square feet. To the north is an asphalt plant, and o o on the west is Southcenter Parkway and across the street low density residential. co al The Green River and a COE Section 205 levee border the site on the east. A W I IL manufacturing company's office and warehouse borders the site on the south. w 0 The site is designated Heavy Industrial on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use ga 5 Lt. a; Map and is zoned Heavy Industrial. The proposed use is consistent with the N a. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban and the proposal must obtain a Shoreline Substantial z Development permit. z O w U r0 — o w uj —O • z; = 0 I-: Approximately 20 -40 people will work on the site when the project is constructed. Housing No housing exists on the site. Aesthetics The type of construction proposed for the building is stucco. The project is subject to design review and will be considered by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. The maximum height of the building in the shoreline area is 35 feet. The building is proposed to be 29 feet. Light/Glare The building will have exterior lighting, which will occur from dusk to dawn. No glare from the building is anticipated. Recreation A pedestrian/bike trail system exists on the opposite side of the Green River along with a City of Kent park. As part of the project, an outside picnic area will be provided for employees of the office building. c: \carol /Segale- Office/sepa -rpt 6 • SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 Historic /Cultural Preservation There are no places or objects listed on or proposed for national state or local preservation registers. Transportation A Traffic Impact Analysis was provided for review. Direct access to the site is via Southcenter Parkway. Transit service is available on South 180th Street, approximately one -half mile north of the project site. Bicycle and vehicle parking will be provided on site. Office uses in the Heavy Industrial zone are required to provide 3 parking stalls for each 1000 square feet of useable office area. For a 16,800 square foot building up to 50 parking stalls will be required. The site plan indicates 59 parking stalls are provided. Two bicycle parking spaces will be required. The traffic analysis identifies the number of trips that will be generated by the additional area being constructed in the office building and distributes the trips on the adjacent roadway system. The number of new trips that will be generated is 148, with a total of 21 AM peak trips and 20 PM peak trips being generated. There are several capital road projects in the Southcenter area identified by the City. A proportionate share of the costs for these projects will apply to this development. The traffic analysis estimates that a total of $4,748 will be paid in concurrency fees as the project's share in the cost of improvements to Strander Boulevard/Andover Park East, S. 180th and West Valley Highway, and Strander Blvd. and West Valley Highway. The exact amount will be determined before the issuance of the building permit. Southcenter Parkway /57th Street, south of South 180th Street is a two -lane road. Based on Traffic Concurrency Standards (TMC 9.48), prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant will dedicate ten (10) feet of additional right of way for future road widening on Southcenter Parkway /57th Street. Curb, gutter and sidewalk will be installed at a later date as part of a larger road improvement project, as required by the Sidewalk Construction Standards (TMC 11.64) and the Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards manual. The applicant will pay a proportionate share of the cost to install these improvements. 7 c: \carol /Segale -Off ice/sepa -rpt ' SEPA Review - E99 -0003 Segale Office Building #982 June 9, 1999 - Utilities Public Services The development of this site as an office building will generate an increased need for public services such as police and fire. The Fire Department has noted that the building will need to be sprinkled and that a hydrant is required within 150 feet of the office building with no portion of the structure further than 300 feet from a hydrant. Utilities currently available at the site include electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, storm water and sanitary sewer. The Minkler sanitary sewer lift station, to which sewage would flow from this project, is scheduled for an upgrade in the near future. At the time of the issuance of the building permit, this project will be required to contribute its fair share towards the cost of this upgrade, as required by the Utility Concurrency Standards (TMC 14.36). No other additional utilities are anticipated to be needed as a result of the building construction. Recommendation Determination of Nonsignificance 8 c: \carol/Segale- Office /sepa -rpt rt 2 J U U0: v)w; W = .. . J H: w Oi 2 u. (.2 e z 1-0 z wW o co w. - V: O zi ui N. ' CHL !IST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PE AT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES VKJ.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (y)'DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. (OATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) 9EPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. u t-a (1(DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIVA ( ()EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST / DETERMINATIONS ' SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TSJKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT NyruKwILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY , () KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES () FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) >SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ("1 CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM (FISHERIES PROGRAM (I VILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 6/5/01 P: \administrativeforms \FORMS \CHKLIST.doc MEDIA (UWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES () CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MLAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant `Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Any parties of record ' send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send these documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Aotlicarion: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed co owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 3 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General • 'Applicant *Indian Tribes 'Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). j Any parries of record send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send these documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo). Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, ecc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Nonce of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) 03/14/00 P:'P[.BLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS.doc CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188-2599 (206) 433-1800 TO: — N U k&•vs,l k3 MOOS 5Y5-2— z < • z Lu2 6 D -J 0 (0 ra CO (IJ CU I Li' 0 g cL., co I a 11.1 Z 0 Z uj o • u j I 0 c.) t= O 1— z • •.• • • • • La Pianta L. Partnership PO Bo (-8 028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 Gaco Westecinc. PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 Gaco Western,,,lnc.. PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 M.A. Segale, Inc. PO Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Mitchell Moving & Storage 18800 Southcenter Parkway Seattle, WA 98188 SchoenbachleF-Enterpr LIc 13256 Northup Way #11 Bellevuie, WA 98005 City of Kent 220 4th Ave S. Kent, WA 98032 Bust ncs5 2 G,l,,e,ls General Medical Corporation 18325 Segale Park Drive "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Tractor Parts PO Box 88753 Tukwila, WA 98138 La Pianta Limited Partnership PO Box-88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 Bruce & Elizabeth Mitchell P.O. Box 99151 Seattle, WA 98199 �... Bruce & Eli be Mitchell ' 19000,5 t7 h PL NE Seattle, WA 98155 Southcenter Golf 18791 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 RTS Packaging 18340 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Schoenbachler Enterprises 6728 - 134th Ct. NE Redmond, WA 98052 z a• w: 0 0 O; W 1. CO 1L. w0 2Q LL gft =' • ci; ui 2 z 1- 0 Z 1-; • w. 7030 al 2 -' 1- ui z . :o z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director May 17, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Monte Kaiser, U.S. Corps of Engineers FM: Carol Lumb, Department of Community Dnt RE: Segale Building #982, Office Building Attached for your review are the following items that pertain the proposal to construct a 16,800 square foot office building, a small portion of which is located within the Shoreline of the State, the Green River: 1. May 14, 1999 letter from King County Water and Land Resources Division 2. SEPA Checklist 3. SEPA Site Plan, Attachment "A" 4. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application 5. Landscape Plan dated 4/5/99 6. Building 982 Site Survey 7. Building 982 Site Plan (includes 3 sheets: Site Plan, Utilities Plan and Erosion Control Plan) 8. Building 982 Cross Sections 9. Soils Report by GeoEngineers, dated 12/9/98 10. Levee Stability Analysis by GeoEngineers, dated 2/25/99 I would appreciate your review of the materials and hearing any concerns or comments the Corps may have on the proposed office building as it relates to the levee or any other issues within your jurisdiction. In particular, I would be interested in any comments you may have on the letter from King County. Water and Land Resources Division and the concerns it raises on the levee raising performed in this reach of the Green River by the applicant and whether it conforms with Corps engineering specifications. If you have any questions, please call me at 206 -431 -3661. Thank you for your review of these materials. c:\carol\Segale-office\COE-memo.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z •_r- W re 6R. J :O O; to a: .tow •w z! N LL w 0 u. I— w: z •10, 1`. 2� U (3: o -: :o F-! I • z: O z King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 (206) 296 -6519 (206) 296 -0192 FAX May 14, 1999 Mr. Steve Lancaster, Director .�.. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED MAY 1 9 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: Review of Application: La Pianta Limited Partnership d.b.a. Segale Business Park Tukwila File Nos. L99 -0020: L99 -0019: E99 -0009 Dear Mr. Lancaster: Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject application for construction of a 16,800 square foot, two story office building at 18500 Southcenter Parkway within the Segale Business Park in the City of Tukwila. King County has a significant interest in this application, as the proposed site development plan may potentially affect the county's maintenance and repair responsibilities for the existing flood containment levee along the Green River at the project site. King County is party to a June 30, 1992 Green River Basin Program Interlocal Agreement with the City of Tukwila and other Green River Valley Cities in which King County has agreed to maintain levees, riverbanks, and revetments within the Green River Flood Control Zone Dis- trict (GRFCZD). To this end, King County in 1991 assigned its River Protection Easement rights to the City of Tukwila as a tenant in common, in order to facilitate Tukwila's completion of the federally authorized Lower Green River Flood Control Project with the Corps of Engi- neers. This easement encumbers portions of the project site within thirty feet of the top -of- bank along the riverward edge of the existing levee crest. This easement width was-established in 1964, and is not adequate for today's continuing flood protection needs. The applicant is clearly relying on this flood protection for the new building which is the sub- ject of this application. Equally important to the project is the County's continuing mainte- nance and repair of this levee segment to provide 100 -year flood containment to the applicant's property. This responsibility is part of the County's agreement with the City of Tukwila. How- ever, performance of this responsibility is dependent on a sufficient easement area within which to accomplish these maintenance services. The connection to the applicant's proposal is that these flood repair and maintenance services are essential for the viability of the building pro- posal. Therefore, requiring sufficient easement area needed to accomplish these services we believe, is a reasonable requirement for issuance of the permits involved, including slope stability provisions of the City of Tukwila's Flood Zone Control Permit. ATTACHMENT D Steve Lancaster May 14, 1999 Page 2 King County has significant concerns with the oversteepened slope angles along the riverward embankments of the existing levee. These concerns are pertinent to the present application for three reasons: 1. First, the present levee slopes are shown in the applicant's cross section drawings of the site at severely oversteepened angles of repose, ranging from approximately 1.32 horizontal feet per vertical foot to about 1.37 horizontal feet per vertical foot (1.32H:1V- 1.37H :1V). These slope angles are far in excess of those required to meet minimum federal standards for levee slope stability. 2. Second, engineering drawings prepared by the Corps of Engineers in April 1989 for levee raising performed in this reach by the subject landowner on behalf of the City of Tukwila as local sponsor to the federal Section 205 Lower Green River Flood Control Project clearly show this work was to be accomplished at overall slope angles of 2H:1 V. The present character of these levee slopes clearly shows the earlier construction work has not achieved this engineering requirement. 3.. Slope stability analyses performed by geotechnical consultants on behalf of King County at two sites immediately downstream of this project location, at a site immediately across the river from this levee, and at three other sites within the lower Green River levee system yield remarkably consistent results with respect to minimum stability requirements needed for levees built on nearly identical soils. In order to achieve the minimum factors of safety required for federal levees, slopes should be placed at from 2H:1V to 2.5H:1V gradients. These findings are again consistent with the 1989 Corps of Engineers 2H:1V design draw- ings for this reach, and clearly show the existing slope configuration is substantially substandard. I therefore respectfully request the City of Tukwila's careful consideration of the site plan review to include reasonably prudent measures assuring the future integrity and stability of the levee system within the project site. Specific measures necessary to this end are requested as follows: 1. Sufficient site area needs to be preserved free from excavation, grading, landscape plant- ings, and other site improvements to facilitate King County's continuing abilities to accom- plish future levee repairs designed at stable angles of repose for the affected levee slopes along the riverbank. Based on discussions with the property owner to date; no independent analyses of riverbank stability have been performed. King County has contracted for geo- technical consultant studies utilizing soils information provided by the applicant to address this concern. Results of these analyses should be forthcoming with detailed recommenda- tions within the next few weeks. Relying on the consistent findings developed by these same consultants for "next door" portions of the levee system within the Segale Business Park, and also for levee reaches immediately across the river from the project site, it is my recommendation.this allowance be predicated on establishing an overall slope gradient of at least 2H:1V, or two horizontal feet to each vertical foot of levee slope elevation above the river bed. 2. Sufficient site area needs be preserved free from site grading, site improvements, and land- scape plantings to provide for establishment of a 15- foot -wide levee maintenance access •`� "�.. ^ ..�.. z 6 �. .J U 000 N W z' CD Li, w o. u-?. v z� �o z I--. U� o I- w uj . O w z. U= 0 z _-� Steve Lancaster May 14, 1999 Page 3 roadway along the top crest of the levee slope, consistent with a top -of -bank location predi- cated on stable slope angles determined pursuant to (1), above. 3. All landscape plantings should be consistent with cross section dimensions and construction details and policies set forth in Corps of Engineers' Publication EM 1110 -2 -301, dated February 28, 1999. This is especially important with regard to King County's continuing ability to maintain the levee system in accordance with applicable regulatory standards affecting levees. See also (4), below. 4. It would appear the project proposal is subject to the provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) with respect to recent listing of Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. The City of Tukwila should consider if site review is consistent with the City's recent submittals concerning programmatic certification under the ESA's required 4(d) Rule. Similarly, the City may need to request that the Corps consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to ensure compliande with requirements estab- lished in Section 7 of the ESA. Based on review of the site plans and cross section drawings submitted to date, it is my request that the City carefully consider our recommendations in the project review and approval proc- ess. At an absolute minimum, it appears that an additional fifteen feet of site area along. the river frontage will need to be dedicated as an easement for the purposes of providing for ade- quate levee stability. This may also address both site level and reach level impacts related to ESA concerns with levees as they potentially affect the listed species. Such measures are reasonably necessary as conditions of approval for the permits required by the subject project. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please call me (206) 296 -8388 if you have any concerns or questions with this letter. Sip rely, v Dave Clark, Manager Rivers Section DC:AL:mm"J25 cc: Carol Lumb, Planner, City of Tukwila Phil Frasier, Senior Engineer, City of Tukwila Noel Gilbrough, Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Paul Komoroske, Emergency Operations Branch, Corps of Engineers Monte Kaiser, Geotechnical Branch, Corps of Engineers Debbie Arima, Assistant Manager, Water and Land Resources Division Sarah Ogier, Program Coordinator, Green River Basin Program Andy Levesque, Senior Engineer z �Z. w re 2 6 0 0. co 0` w z; N u. w o. - w< Co. 1- w z� �- o. z uj D0 oN o w w. U' 1- z. w U N o z °04119%1999 16 :00 206 - 205 -=kA4 King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 -5022 (206) 288 -8619 (206) 299 -0192 FAX April 16, 1999 Mr. Steve Lancaster Director Department of Community Development. City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 KC WLRD RIVERS ---c. PAGE 02 RE: Review of Application: La Planta Limited Partnership d.b.a. Segale Business Park Tukwila File Nos. L99 -0006; L99 -0007: E99 -0003 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject application for construction of Building No. 981, proposed for construction within the Segale Business Park in the City of Tukwila. King County has a significant interest in this application, as the proposed site development plan may potentially affect the county's maintenance and repair obligations regarding the existing flood containment levee along the Green River at the project site. King County is party to a June 30, 1992 Green River Basin Program Interlocal Agreement with the. City of Tukwila and other Green River Valley Cities in which King County has agreed to maintain levees, riverbanks, and revetments within the Green River Flood Control Zone District (GRFCZD). To this end, King County in 1991 assigned its River Protection Easement rights to the City of Tukwila as a tenant in common, in order to facilitate Tukwila's completion of the federally authorized Lower Green River Flood Control Project with the Corps of Engineers. This easement encumbers portions of the project site within thirty feet of the top -of -bank along the riverward edge of the existing levee crest. This easement width was established in 1964, and may not be adequate to today's continuing flood protection needs. In addition to completion of their Section 205 levee - raising initiative at the site, the Corps has also accomplished a Public Law 84-99 levee repair to 700 feet of the levee system within the Segale Business Park in 1990, with King County as the Local Sponsor. In 1991, King County and the Corps cooperated in an Emergency Flood Fight along 2000 feet of the landward levee toe. In 1993, King County and the City of Tukwila signed a further interlocal agreement to cost share the local sponsors' portion of funding for completion of a federal Hazard Mitigation Grant Program project to stabilize 900 feet of the riverward levee slopes and relieve seepage hazards along 1200 feet of the landward levee toe within the Segale Business Park. This work was completed in 1997. An additional 80 feet of emergency seepage control work was performed by King County in 1995, within the downstream portions of the project site which is the subject of the present application. Much of the seepage control work and emergency response efforts accomplished at the Segale Business Park has required work outside the width provided in the 1964 easements. A Permanent Right of Access, extending some twenty feet landward of the historic easements, was needed to allow for this work. This additional interest in the affected property has been obtained by agreement with the landowner. No such agreement has yet been reached within the site area now subject to this present application. Z = Z re Lu2 6 _tU 0 CO CI W Z J i N LL w0 < tOd Lux 1- O w~ 2 o' O N' ❑ I- 111 U -_ ~O: ui U =:. O~ z - 04/L9 %1999 16:00 206- 205;. 34 April 16, 1999 Steve Lancaster Page Two KC WLRD RIVERS-"7C PAGE 03 The total cost for construction of these levee repairs within the Segale Business Park over the last ten years has easily exceeded 52 Million. King County has significant concerns with this level of continuing expense and respectfully requests the City of Tukwila's careful consideration of the site plan review to include reasonably prudent measures assuring the future integrity and stability of the levee system within the project site. Specific measures reasonably necessary to this end are requested as follows: 1. Sufficient site area needs to be preserved free from excavation, grading, landscape plantings, and other site improvements so as to facilitate King County's continuing abilities to accomplish future levee repairs designed at stable angles of repose for the affected levee slopes along the riverbank. Based on discussions with the property owner to date, no independent analyses of riverbank stability have been performed. King County has contracted for geotechnical consultant studies utilizing soils information provided by the applicant to address this concern. Results of these analyses should be forthcoming with detailed site recommendations within the next few weeks. Relying for the moment on findings developed by these same county consultants for downstream portions of the levee system within the Segate Business Park, and also for levee reaches immediately across the river from the project site, it is my recommendation this allowance be predicated on establishing an overall slope gradient of 2H:1 V, or two horizontal feet to each vertical foot of levee slope elevation above the river bed. 2. Sufficient site area needs be preserved free from site grading, site improvements, and landscape plantings to provide for establishment of a 15- foot -wide levee maintenance access roadway along the top crest of the levee slope, consistent with a top -of -bank location predicated on stable slope angles determined pursuant to (1), above. 3. All landscape plantings should be consistent with cross section dimensions and construction details and policies set forth in Corps of Engineers' Publication EM 1110 = 2.301, dated February 28, 1999. This is especially important with regard to King County's continuing ability to maintain the levee system in accordance with applicable regulatory standards affecting levees. See also (4), below. 4. To the extent that construction, excavation, and /or landscape plantings may be proposed within the existing River Protection Easement for the levee, it would appear the project proposal is clearly subject to the provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) with respect to recent listing of Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. The City of Tukwila may need to consider if site review is consistent with its recent statements conceming programmatic certification under the ESA's required 4(d) Rule. Similarly, the City may need to request that the Corps consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to ensure compliance with requirements established in Section 7 of the ESA. z F— w dr- re UO 0 0 W= • J � u_, ' wO g Q. to = d, w z� H O1 z i- 2 U� Ow w w. I z • w U -. 0 I—. z 04/19/1999 16:00 2e6-205-1.34 April 16, 1999 • Steve Lancaster Page Three KC WLRD RIVERS PAGE 04 Based on review of the site plans and cross section drawings submitted to date, it is my sincere belief that difficult decisions wilt need to be made by the City to accomplish the forgoing recommendations. At an absolute minimum, it appears that an additional fifteen feet of site area along the river frontage will need to be dedicated as an easement for the purposes of providing for adequate levee stability.. This may also address both site level and reach level impacts related to ESA concerns with levees as they may affect the listed species. It is my belief such measures are reasonably necessary as conditions of approval for issuance of the subject permits. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please call me 206 - 296 -8388 if you have any concerns or questions with this letter. • Sincerely, Dave Clark, Manager Rivers Section Cc: Debbie Arima, Assistant Manager, WLR Division Sarah Ogler, Program Coordinator, •Green River Basin Program Andy Levesque, Senior Engineer Carol Lumb, Planner, City of Tukwila Phil Frasier, Senior Engineer Noel Gilbrough, Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Pau( Komoroske, Emergency Operations Branch Monte Kaiser, Geotechnical. Branch Z aw 6 v` 0 cn w; 1.11 l- CO w 0' u_ a. N D: Z I—O Z I— ;0f w wf ;H U; u- 0 .ii Z`. U N; 0 .. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98138 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC III- F'ORMATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I J-t�v e e,-(51^ (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on Q y IL/ F 7 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 1ff5ao so,,U-Ice- -, tea Po -Nett i..y so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number L 95- ooPo - c .r L 9q-. oo/ 9 - Dcsi gh ,ew tc S7 • cc o i - G %NUS -0." r,cjr.t 1 12cview SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this•d day of Affiant (Applicant Signature) ARY PU in an the State of Washington residing at .17,ce5 d My commission expires on 5// D off. A F F I D A V I T I , G(�c weiTM 6tkic-A6 ONotice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting OBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet EBoard of Appeals Agenda Packet LiPlanning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: ot.E.-Nice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit of the followin g addresses on '././/47/199 9 was mailed to each LiDetermination of Non- significance fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance LiDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action fl Official Notice a -0Eher Y' G'C QC/ fl Other 76/17.4`77//S/- Name of Project/ / % "-57.% Signature w °%dLGG� vf File Number t.:--9.9-6 J -L M Di 4-479-G100 �„ Z .a Z w. :U O; . �o w z: J •'.CO L 2 IL.Q • =d _, Z F.. H- O' .Z . Vim, U 0. • .w w ui Ni z City of Tula/i la John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED April 14, 1999 Steve Lancaster, Director The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: LOCATION: FILE NUMBERS: PROPOSAL: La Pianta Limited Partnership d.b.a. Segale Business Park 18500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA L99 -0020 (Shoreline Substantial Development Permit); L99 -0019 (Design Review); E -99 -0009 (Environmental Review) To construct a two - story, 16,800 square foot, wood framed stucco office building adjacent to the Green River. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Land Altering, Building Permit The files may be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 14, 1999. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on June 24, 1999. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the hearing is still scheduled for this date. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Board of Architectural Review. You may also request notification of the final decision. If you have questions about this proposal contact Carol Lumb, the planner in charge of this file at 431 -3661. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Board of Architectural Review on a project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. A decision of the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review may be appealed to the Tukwila City Council. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: c;carol /Segale -of ice/notapp March 12, 1999 April 7, 1999 April 14, 1999 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT M.. -INGS (V) Q.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ('DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE ) KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKNI:.A CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) ( ) POLICE ( ) ( ) PLANNING ( ) ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) ( ) CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ✓s MUC:Q.ESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE (vT DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WPSIDATA \CDI IST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ". -r / DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV ( yl DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION^r (.1/1e,s.Liti ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES a.(ia ef5 • ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE (s.,4 K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CITR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ✓ ..trui w0•14,1 sw Fu:.<. L -)r.k/ �►^',,,�?� �, SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES Avudc1 l.z 1, cS� ✓c ( ) HIG'HLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT *20 WATER DISTRICT $125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENT C:1 PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY LF sa TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PRCJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE /INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF CR MORE MEDIA 1 re 2 6 U0. N 0, N W: W =+ J W 0; u-Q; G70` Z d; • W. 2 Z �. 1- 0, Z I—• W W 0 -': O I-; :W W. IL Hi Z: Cu co;. U —� 0 1— Z Gaco West PO B Seattle, , Inc. 698 98138 M.A. Segale, Inc. PO Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98138 Mitchell Moving & Storage 18800 Southcenter Parkway Seattle, WA 98188 Gaco es rn, Inc. PO Box 698 Seattle 98138 M.A. S PO Box Tukwila, Mitchell 18800 Sout Seattle, W ale Inc; 50 98138 g & Storage enter Parkway. 188 I��j' -Gbh 1�► «S General Medical Corporation 18325 Segale Park Drive "B" Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Tr ctor Parts PO x 8753 Tukwil WA 98138 La Pia to PO Box Tukwila, Li ited Partnership 28 98138 -2028 Gen al M dical Corporation 18325 ale Park Drive "B" Tukwil . A 98188 Seattle Tractor Parts PO Box 88753 Tukwila, WA 98138 La Pia - Li ' ted Partnership PO Box ::I 8 Tukwila, A 98138 -2028 Southcenter Golf 18791 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 RTS Packaging 18340 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 South. ent 18791 Tukwila Golf thcenter Parkway 98188 RTS ' =cka ing 18340 • hcenter Parkway Tukwila n 98188 z _I z 'U O� CO o. w: w =: Jam. w o;. u_ <C: D. N = a, H w = ?� � o zI-: LIJ U , 0 -1 • :1 U' F- of Z: I" .o� z • La Pianta Limited Partnership PO Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 Gaco Western, Inc. PO Box 88698 Seattle, WA 98138 Schoenbachler Enterpr Llc 13256 Northup Way #11 Bellevue, WA 98005 City of Kent 220 4th Ave S. Kent, WA 98032 La Pian - im' ed Partnership Scho , bachl PO Box 88 e 8 13256 N Tukwila, • : 38 -2028 Bellevue, Gaco est PO Box Seattle,: n, Inc. 98 98138 C 220 Kent Bruce & Elizabeth Mitchell 19000 57th PL NE Seattle, WA 98155 r Enterpr Lic Bruce : Eli ' . beth Mitchell up Way #11 19000 - PL NE 98005 Seattle n • 98155 nt Ave S. 98032 ce O O, moo: NW W X? -1I-. CO • a: _a �w s: z �o z I- uy i0 C--1 1- W W` V W H; 0; • Z ci H 0 April 7, 1999 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director APRIL 7, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Mr. Steve Nelson P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila, WA 98138 -2028 RE: Segale Business Park, Building 982 Files: L99 -0020 - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit L99 -0019 - Design Review E99 -0009 - Environmental Review Dear Mr. Nelson: Your application for a shoreline substantial development permit for an office building in the shoreline which is subject to design review and SEPA, located at 18500 Southcenter Parkway, has been found to be complete on April 7, 1999 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project may be scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission in May or June, 1999. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to prepare and install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. Please call me 3 days prior to installing the notice board to arrange the pick up of the laminated Notice of Application. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, please return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain any other necessary permits issued by other agencies. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z z, 6 J0. U 0, N 0: w: w =. J � wO La = d. �w z�. F- 0 w 2 0 I— w ` u� I- U IL - O: LLIZ U m, z Mr. Steve Nelson Segale Business Park: Building 982 April 7, 1999 I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c: \carol\segale -office \complete.doc 02/23/1994 14:13 KEN RGE L.I! u!'. .I1 h AR littC\ t 12068684292 21603 NE 1 !Ih Coin Redmond, WA 98053 -4104 Phone. 425.636 -4578 Fax: 425.66B -4292 Pager: ?.06464.1269 Collor 9G6-R1!) 7346 Segale Business Park 18000 Andover 'arkway, Suite 200 Tukwila, WA 981 58 RE: 982 C.i+ice `:wilding KEN LARGE LANDSCAPE April 1,1999 The genera requirements of the zoning code Chapter 18.52, Section 18.52.040, Item B. Coverage Standards requires 9070 live ground coverage within 3 years and 40% tme r,c•verage within 10 years. PAGE 02 All shrub!) and aroundcovers are sized and planted to attain a continuous cover of living plants :.er standard landscape practice. Most groundcn"ers are not spaced greater than 2' triangular spacing. if these plants grow 5" r!er year, then full coverage would occur within 3 years. The shrubs w i! . .arnw approximately 6" per year and Should be touching within 3 years. The ash t ;rf. ft are planted with an 8 -10' wide canopy. These trees will grow 2 -3 feet spread per year. The hornbeams are approximately 6' width at planting. Their ma•'•ure: wiA th is approximately 16'. Within 10 years the selected trees will reach mat :..re canopy, more than 40'/ coverage. At the river dike the coniferous trees are olart :.ad at approximately 30' on center. The selected varieties stay full to the ground and do not spread in canopy, as do deciduous trees. The trees specified ore In:;;tal(ed at 6' width, and will grow in width at the rate of 1' to 18" per year vVithiri 10 years the coniferous trees at the river will have a spread of 16'. The conife-aus trees to the west of the building are 10" caliper and have a 20' canopy. Tht•se trees will not grow much more in canopy width, perhaps 10 %, additional widt i. ctT' ©V r tNVtlA rim -• 3 t i.:: 7arbi'.. k % PEBW V CENTER 02/23/1994 14:13 12068684292 5ega(e 5u5ine55 Park April 1,1999 Page 2 Total (andscape area: KEN LARGE LANDSCAPE 20,640 of Total Canopy in square feet at planting: A. Fraxinus: 50,24 5f /ea x5 251.2ef 5. Carpinus: 28.26 of /ea x12 339.12sf C. PinuS: 314 Sf /ea x6 1884a D. Thu a: 28.26 sf /ea x 5 141. _ of Total canopy in 'if at planting 2615.620 Total Canopy in square feet projected in 10 years: A. Fraxinus: 6C7.6 of /ea x5 3038.00 sf 3. Carpinus: 200.96 5f /ea x12 2411.52sf C. Ptnue: 665.56 of /ea x6 4010.165f n. Thuja: 200.96 sf /ea x 5 1004 80 sf Total canopy in 3f in 10 years 10464.48sf Total percent of projected canopy coverage in 10 year P(eaee call shat F 1 you have any questions or comments. sincerely, Kenneth E. Larg Landscape Architect 50.770 PAGE 03 • �w C JU `U O so u) w. w :c J F-; N LL; w 0: J d w:. z f-. 2! '12 Di V0 O •Ni sae w. Z U �i , Alit F .z 21803 NE 17th Court Redmond, WA 98053 -4104 Phone: 425-836-L578 Fax: 425 - 868 -^92 Pager: 206 -464 -1269 Cellular: 206-818-7346 Segale Business Park 18000 Andover Parkway, Suite 200 Tukwila, WA 98138 RE: 982 Office Building Attn: Steve Nelson Dear Steve: The general requirements of the zoning code Chapter 18.52, Section 18.52.040, Item B. Coverage Standards requires 90% live ground coverage within 3 years and 40% tree coverage within 10 years. All shrubs and groundcovers are sized and planted to attain a continuous cover of living plants per standard landscape practice. Most groundcovers are not spaced greater than 2' triangular spacing. If these plants grow 3" per year, then full coverage would occur within 3 years. The shrubs will grow approximately 6" per . year and should be touching within 3 years. The ash trees are planted with an 8 -10' wide canopy. These trees will grow 2 -3 feet spread per year. The hornbeams are approximately 6' width at planting. Their mature width is approximately 16'. Within 10 years the selected trees will reach mature canopy, more than 40% coverage. At the river dike the coniferous trees are planted at approximately 30' on center. The selected varieties stay full to the ground and do not spread in canopy, as do deciduous trees. The trees specified are installed at 6' width, and will grow in width at the rate of 1' to 18" per year. Within 10 years the coniferous trees at the river will have a spread of 16'. The coniferous trees to the west of the building are 10" caliper and have a 20' canopy. These trees will not grow much more in canopy width, perhaps 10% additional width. Segale Business Park March 12, 1999 Page 2 Total landscape area: 20,640 sf Total Canopy in square feet at planting: A. Fraxinus: 50.24 sf /ea x 10 502.40 sf B. Carpinus: 28.26 sf /ea x 9 254.34 sf C. Pinus: 314 sf /ea x 12 3768.00 sf D. Thuja: 28.26 sf /ea x 5 141.30 sf Total canopy in sf at planting 4666.04 sf Total Canopy in square feet projected in 10 years: Y A. Fraxinus: 607.6 sf /ea x 10 B. Carpinus: 200.96 sf /ea x9 C. Pinus: 668.36 sf /ea x 12 D. Thuja: 200.96 sf /ea x 5 Total canopy in sf in 10 years 6076.00 sf 1808.32 sf 8020.32 sf 1004.80 sf 16,909.76 sf Total percent of projected canopy coverage in 10 years 82% Please call should you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Kenneth E. Large Landscape Architect CITY Oi UKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OFPROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Segal a Business Park Building 982 1 B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREE ADDRESS: 18500 Southcenter Parkway ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMEES: 35234 -9116 LEGAL DESDRIF-i3N: See attached Quarter: SE Section: 35 Township: 23N Rance: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary can;act retarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Steve Nelson ADDRESS: P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila WA 98138 PHONE: (206) 575 -2000 SIGNATURE: rri-J7 v)-) DATE: 3 //21 9 5 FOR STAFFUSE ONLY Planner :.. File.Number: 0 1.11„06,.. f' EOENED '` OF TOKWii Receipt Number: . • Project File #: ' NAP' 1 2.19°. ❑ Application complete (Date: ) SEPA File #: +� ❑ Application incomplete (Date: ) :r,.. ;rC.L NTE(' 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OFPROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Segal a Business Park Building 982 1 B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREE ADDRESS: 18500 Southcenter Parkway ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMEES: 35234 -9116 LEGAL DESDRIF-i3N: See attached Quarter: SE Section: 35 Township: 23N Rance: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary can;act retarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Steve Nelson ADDRESS: P.O. Box 88028 Tukwila WA 98138 PHONE: (206) 575 -2000 SIGNATURE: rri-J7 v)-) DATE: 3 //21 9 5 E. CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: HI -Heavy Industrial F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: There is a small office building with parking for M.A. Segale, Inc.'s Asphalt Division G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: Urban H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) The project is surrounded generally by commercial properties. There is one residential property, a golf driving range, City of Kent park, and the Green River trail system within the 1000' radius I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed development (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal.) $1 , 008,000.00 J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The project consists of constructing a two level, wood framed, stucco finished office building with an asphalt parking lot. K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) None L. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: June 1999 . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: January 2000 , (lf project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates:) • M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: None N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): None SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 3 0. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): None. P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING/LOADING /STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high watermark.) Edge of parking lot varies from 96 feet to 238 feet landward of the Mean High Water Mark. C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark.) Maximum height is 29'. Minimum setback is 184' landward of the Mean High Water Mark. R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: Existing vegatation and ground cover to remain riverward of the existing levee. I1. TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 4 111. OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. PERMIT # [n Tukwila Conditional Use Permit • Tukwila Variance Permit pi Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: SEPA decision date: ® Tukwila Design Review Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval • Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood Ord. #1462) ® Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ® Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) ❑ Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ▪ Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) r-1 Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA • Dept. of Ecology) Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of • Fish & Wildlife) Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination • System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Aquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) • Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) ® Other: APPUCATION DATE DATE APPROVED SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 5 Q F= w. CC 2 UO w is J N LL wO ?. Zet Lit 1- Z '. Z U� O w W: Z! U N: O ~' Z... IV. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES A. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) See attached exhibit "A" B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) See attached exhibit "B" V. SHOREUNES DESIGN POUCIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commercial/development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. 3. Preference should be given to commercial /industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NEW PARCEL D - THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE, ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE ANNA MESS COUNTY ROAD (57Th AVENUE SOUTH) AND FROM WHICH POINT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 BEARS SOUTH 02° 02' 43" WEST, 313.17 FEET AND NORTH 87° 57' 17" WEST, 505.54 FEET, SAID DISTANCES BEING MEASURED, RESPECTIVELY, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST. 1.64 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD AS IT EXISTS. AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 25° 01' 32" EAST ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN 215.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66° 36' 23" EAST, 486.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23° 28' 47" WEST, 97.92 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A FLOOD CONTROL EASTMENT AND RIGHT -OF- WAY AS DEFINED IN KING COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 31833 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 6014672 AND 6027015; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 10° 47' 56" EAST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04° 28'. 23" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 32.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74° 43' 14" WEST, 157.00 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 59" WEST, 341.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "A" DIST IV. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT 18.44.60 Height, yard and area regulations. The maximum building height will be 29 feet using the average grades around the building within the shoreline zone. The minimum front yard setback will be 104 feet, the minimum side yard setback will be 59 feet, and the minimum rear setback will be 184 feet. 18.44.70.1 Parking regulations. 18.56.050 Required number of parking stalls. The minimum number of off- street parking spaces shall be calculated as shown in Figure 18 -7. • Office - 3 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of office space. • Bicycle stalls —1 space per 50 parking stalls. 18.44.110 General shoreline regulations. 1. The underlying zoning district for this site is HI -Heavy Industrial per the City of Tukwila Zoning Map dated December 4, 1995. 18.34.020 Permitted uses. Item 37: Building will be used for office space as permitted within the HI zoning district. 2. This project will not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. 3. There will be no structures or accessory facilities over the river. 4. There will be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment 5. No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications as set fourth in the Surface Water Design Manual, January 1992, published by King County Public Works Department — Surface Water Division. All storm water will drain into the P17 drainage basin. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations will be complied with. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river will be protected. 8. Erosion control measures will be installed per the approved land altering plans and permits. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained. 10. There will be no dredging in the Green River. EXHIBIT "A" 11. There will be no mining. 12. There will be no solid waste disposal along the river shoreline. 13. No property will be sold for public use. 14. There will be no landfill within the river environment. 15. There are no cotton wood trees on the site. 18.44.140 Specific use regulations — low impact environment A. Low impact environment allowed uses. . The parking lot will be screened from the River Environment with trees spaced at a maximum 30 foot centers. 4z�, UO •UCI., W •= • COIL: w 0i J' •!L cc • = O' ,z �. ww ONi' • • V' Z U • N` • H r !77.'"' . . �Z. EXHIBIT "B" IV. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT Policy 5.1.1 Urban -Open Space Environment Redevelopment of existing commercial and industrial areas. The site is between the Highway 99 bridge and South 204th and is designated as Urban -Open Space Environment. Policy 5.4.1 Design, locate and manage shoreline uses in a manner which maintains reasonable use and enjoyment of private property. Policy 5.4.4 Maintain flexibility in methods for different site conditions and private property concem that mighty conflict with access, such as privacy, safety, and security. Policy 5.6.6 Provide a private natural area in lieu of physical public access. Policy 5.9.1 Ensure that shoreline development and activities protect riverbank vegetationa dn, where feasible, restore degraded riverbanks, in order to minimize and compensate for impacts on fish and wildlife habitat. Policy 5.10.1 Design, locate, and manage shoreline development including streets, flood control projects, surface water drainage and sewer systems, clearing and grading activities, and landscaping in a manner that minimizes opportunities for pollutants to enter the river, provides erosion control, and otherwise protects water quality. _ 1- F- w g D JU UO cn rn w N w u. El a z F- O:, Z F- LU tu, :0E-; wa J z U�. O Z CITY OF i _�KWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development (DCD). Please contact the DCD if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until the application is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vesting of the applicant's rights. However, submittal of these materials in no way limits the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. The DCD Planning staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) Shoreline Permit Application Fee ($550) SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) Design Review Permit Application (if building permit required) (6 copies) ($900) Utility Permit Application for Flood Control Zone (4 copies) Utility Permit Application for Storm Drainage Review (4 copies) PLANS [Six (6) copies of the following]: Vicinity map showing location of the site. Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's property lines. Survey at a scale of 1" = 20' or 1"=30', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the surveyor with surveyor's original signature. The following information must be contained on the survey: Property dimensions, lot size and names of adjacent roads Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark Distance to federal projects and navigation channels • Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment • Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffers (TMC 18.45.040) s°C Existing grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% Existing trees over 4" in diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved Shoreline profile cross - sections at minimum 75 -foot intervals alonr±,site's shoreline, showing: ON Existing top of bank, ...ndward catch -point of levee, riverbank ...e, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) 4 Proposed structures /improvements For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels at Limits of the River Environment, 60 -foot Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment Existing and proposed ground elevations Plan view location of shoreline profile cross - sections Site plan at same scale as survey, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the architect. The following information must be contained on the site plan: 0, Property lines and names of adjacent roads Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffer widths (TMC 18.45.040) Proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond the subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% Construction limit lines, and areas of clearing/grading/filling - Notations identifying source, composition, volume (cu. ft.) and extent (acres) of any fill material - Notations identifying composition, volume (cu. ft.) extent (acres) and proposed disposal site of any extracted material Erosion control measures and tree /buffer protection measures (e.g. barricades, fencing). Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with required setbacks Lowest finished floor elevation Location of driveways, fire lanes, parking, loading and service areas, with parking calculations and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas Location of site furniture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art Location and type of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications, including any trail easements • Dike /riverbank maintenance easement (min. width: 30' riverward from catch -point of levee) Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of utilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications Conceptual storm drainage plans with storage, detention and water - quality improvements (see Utility Application requirements for Storm Drainage Review) Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences Landscape /planting plan at same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be contained on the plan: O Existing trees to be saved by size and species O Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing O Location of service areas, vaults and mechanical units with proposed screening. Building elevations ariloor plans at a scale of 1/4" = 1' or 1%= 1' with graphic scale and date. Each sheet shall have ti... License stamp of the architect. Include c. , .ne elevations: fIrk Dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements 'fit Location and type of exterior building lighting Location of mechanical units with proposed screening Floor plan and square footage for uses tgi One (1) high quality 8 1/2" x 11" reduction of the above plans. If the project undergoes significant changes, an additional set of reductions may be required. 0, APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO SHORELINE PERMIT QUESTIONS & DESIGN POLICIES Written responses to attached Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application questions and Shoreline Design Policies (6 copies). ❑ OTHER MATERIALS Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate, such as color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to be considered, eight (8) copies of each must be submitted (except models). Color drawings or photos may be submitted as 8.5 x 11 -inch color photocopies. PUBLIC NOTICE: King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject property. r9k Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings --e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included.) See Attachment A. 0 A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on -site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B. Geo , j Engineers Segale Business Park PO Box 88028 18000 Andover Park West, Suite 200 Tukwila, Washington 98138 Attention: Steve Nelson February 25, 1999 9f 'a RECEI E CITY OF TU►'WILq MAR 1 11-1q PERMIT CENTER Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Offices in Washington. Oregon, and Alaska Geotechnical Engineering Services Green River Levee Proposed Office Building Development Tukwila, Washington File No. 0291 - 012 -00 INTRODUCTION This presents our assessment of the effects on the Green River levee due to proposed grading at the adjacent office site. The proposed new office is anticipated to have approximately 16,800 square -feet of floor space on two floors and is to be located next to an existing office building. Ground level finish floor elevation is anticipated to be about 31 feet. The Green River passes south and east of the site. We understand that there is a concern that site grading associated with the new office may adversely effect the Green River levee. A Site Plan showing the proposed office footprint and sections which show existing and proposed site grades along the levee is attached. The plan and sections were prepared by Segale Business Park. As indicated on the plan, the 100 -year flood elevation is 30 feet. We have previously prepared a geotechnical engineering report, dated December 9, 1998, for this site. Our report addresses site preparation, earthwork and other geotechnical issues associated with this project. CONCLUSIONS Proposed grading operations at the site will be limited to the inland side of the levee and will increase grades in the building area by approximately 3 feet. Based on our review of the Site Plan and sections 0 +00 through 1+50 provided, we understand that no grade changes are anticipated within about 60 feet of the levee. GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Telephone (253) 383 -4940 Fax (253) 3834923 www.geoengineers.com Segale Business Parl February 25, 1999 Page 2 In our opinion, placement of the proposed fill will not adversely effect the levee. In addition, based on the information provided and our understanding of existing conditions and past improvements, it is our opinion that the existing levee slopes are presently stable and adequately protected and do not require additional protection. If the site elevations or slopes are changed from those shown on the sections provided and discussed above, we should be consulted regarding potential effects on the levee. z . J0 0O' 0 <: tnW' +► W= • w 2 u.a D cat: Yours very truly, _ z1,—;• We trust that this letter provides the information you require. If you have questions or need additional information, please call. GeoEngineers, Inc. I- 0- Z M p' off': 0I W w' 0, David S. Phelps LI O 219/ / 9q Geotechnical Engineer W z co U '0 DSP:GWH:vc Document ID: 02910120L1.DOC GeoEngineers Gary W. Henderson Principal File No: 0291 -012-00 : .� 1 Geo En neers January 20, 1999 Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Offices in Washington. Segale Business Park 1— z Oregon, and Alaska PO Box 88028 6 tY 2. 18000 Andover Park West, Suite 200 - 6 v Tukwila, Washington 98180 N Oo cn w; Attention: Steve Nelson w LL, Report Addendum O Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Warehouse Building Development u. Q` Tukwila, Washington CO d File No: 0291 - 011 -00 _ Z o; INTRODUCTION Ow ~ This letter presents conclusions and recommendations that are supplemental to our v December 22, 1998 report for the above reverenced project. The recommendations are also !o HI applicable to the Proposed Office Building Development (GEI Report No. 0291- 012 -00). The w w. 2 V following presents our recommendations for Uniform Building Code (UBC) Seismic Zone and t— F Soil Profile Type. 0; z! U � SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS o I As defined in the UBC, 1997 edition, the project sites are located in Seismic Zone 3 with a Z z factor of 0.30. Based on our explorations at the sites, we recommend UBC Soil Profile Type SD. LIMITATIONS The above should be considered an addendum to our reports dated December 22 and December 9, 1998. Except as modified herein, the conclusions, recommendations and limitations presented in the reports remain in effect and are unchanged as a result of this letter. GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, \VA 98402 Telephone (253) 3834940 Fax (253) 3834923 www.geoengineers.com Printed on recycled paper. 4¢► Segale Business Parke January 20, 1999 Page 2 We trust that this letter provides the information you require. If you have questions or need additional information, please call. DSP:GWH:vc Document ID: 0291011RA1.DOC G e o E n g i n e e r s Very truly yours, GeoEngineers, Inc. David S. Phelps Geotechnical Engineer iaieroded-, Gary W. Henderson Principal File No. 0291 - 011 -00 ,] Geo!Engineers Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88028 18000 Andover Park West, Suite 200 Tukwila, Washington 98180 Attention: Steve Nelson December 9, 1998 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 1 2 1999 PERMIT CENTER Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Offices in Washington, Oregon, anti Alaska Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Office Building Development Tukwila, Washington File No. 0291 -012 -00 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface explorations and geotechnical engineering services for design of a new Segale Business Park office building in Tukwila, Washington. The project site is located east of Southcenter Parkway as indicated on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. We understand that Segale Business Park intends to construct a two -story, slab -on -grade office structure at the site. The building will have an approximately 9,000 square -foot footprint. The new office building is to be located adjacent to an existing office building approximately as shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our geotechnical services is to explore subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the project site and to develop geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the proposed office building and associated improvements. Our specific scope of services for this project includes the following: 1. Collecting samples of the soils encountered in the test pits, observing soil and ground water conditions, and maintaining a log of the explorations. In addition, we have reviewed available records of nearby subsurface explorations previously conducted by GeoEngineers and others as a basis for our recommendations. 2. Based on our observations and review, providing recommendations for site preparation and building foundation design including preload requirements and appropriate foundation design parameters. GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Telephone (253) 3834940 Fax (253) 927 -4039 w«wgeoengineers.com % Geo \•Engineers December 9, 1998 Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists z Segale Business Park Offices in Washington. = H P.O. Box 88028 , F- z Oregon, and Alaska u1 18000 Andover Park West, Suite 200 6 Tukwila, Washington 98180 v v 0. tn4: Attention: Steve Nelson w i J Hs Report w O Geotechnical Engineering Services 2 Proposed Office Building Development g Q Tukwila, Washington MI D File No. 0291 -012 -00 H w z zF- I-o INTRODUCTION :w w' This report presents the results of our subsurface explorations and geotechnical engineering Do services for design of a new Segale Business Park office building in Tukwila, Washington. The : O CO project site is located east of Southcenter Parkway as indicated on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. = ID W We understand that Segale Business Park intends to construct a two -story, slab -on -grade I- H LI office structure at the site. The building will have an approximately 9,000 square -foot o z footprint. The new office building is to be located adjacent to an existing office building v approximately as shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. z 1-- SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our geotechnical services is to explore subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the project site and to develop geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the proposed office building and associated improvements. Our specific scope of services for this project includes the following: 1. Collecting samples of the soils encountered in the test pits, observing soil and ground water conditions, and maintaining a log of the explorations. In addition, we have reviewed available records of nearby subsurface explorations previously conducted by GeoEngineers and others as a basis for our recommendations. 2. Based on our observations and review, providing recommendations for site preparation and building foundation design including preload requirements and appropriate foundation design parameters. GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Telephone (253) 3834940 Fax (253) 927-4039 w,vw.geoengineers.com Segale Business Park December 9, 1998 Page 2 3. Preparing a written report containing our conclusions and recommendations along with our supporting data. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The proposed new office site is located directly east of an existing office building and south of the existing asphalt batch plant. The site is presently undeveloped except for paved parking east and north of the existing office. We understand that the proposed building area was previously surcharged by stockpiled soil. Existing ground surface elevation in the proposed building footprint is about 28 feet (based on topographic data supplied by Segale Business Park) The height of material stockpiles located north and east of the site ranges from about Elevation 35 to 50 feet. The property boundaries, topographic contours, and proposed building location are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS Subsurface explorations were conducted by Geoengineers Inc. on November 19, 1998 at the approximate locations indicated on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Exploratory test pits were advanced using a rubber -tired backhoe and operator supplied by Segale Business Park. Representative bulk samples were obtained from the test pits. The explorations were located in the field by our personnel by taping or pacing from relevant site features. Test pit locations should be considered approximate. Our representative collected samples of the soils encountered, observed ground water conditions and maintained a detailed log of the explorations. Soils were classified in general accordance with Figure 3. Existing ground surface elevations shown on the logs were estimated from topographic data supplied by Segale Business Park. Summary test pit logs are presented as Figure 4. Laboratory testing consisting of moisture content determination of selected bulk samples. Moisture results are presented on the corresponding logs. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface soils encountered in the explorations generally consist densely compacted sand and gravel fill overlying alluvial deposits consisting of interbedded fine to medium sand, sandy silt and silt in a medium dense to dense or stiff condition. Fill soil consisting of sand and gravel with varying amounts of silt and occasional cobbles was encountered to a depth of 3.25 feet and 3 feet below existing ground surface (approximately Elevation 28 feet) in test pits 1 and 2 respectively. The fill was described as very dense to dense and moist. In test pit 2, an approximately 1 -foot thickness of waste asphalt was encountered at the ground surface. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 0291 -012-00 ] Segale Business Park December 9, 1998 Page 3 Below the fill, test pit 1 encountered medium dense to dense, moist, fine to medium sand with silt to a depth of about 8 feet. Below the sand, moist, stiff silt with trace fine sand and organic material was encountered to the 10 -foot depth explored. Below the waste asphalt and sand and gravel fill, test pit 2 encountered dense, moist fme sand with silt to a depth of about 10 feet. Below the sand, stiff, moist silt with fme sand was encountered to the bottom of the test pit at 12 feet. No ground water was encountered in the test pits. No caving was noted. Summary logs of the test pits are presented in Figure 4. Deeper explorations from nearby sites indicate that the silt encountered at the bottom of test pits 1 and 2 is underlain by medium dense to dense silty sand and sand. These explorations also indicate that relatively shallow ground water (on the order of 10 feet below ground surface or less) can be expected in the area. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on our site explorations and observations, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development. We recommend that the proposed office building be supported on shallow spread and strip footings founded on densely compacted fill overlying the native silty sand and sand with silt. In our opinion, existing site soils are . sufficiently dense and the presence of previously stockpiled soil in the building area precludes the need to preload the site to control post - construction settlement. Pertinent conclusions and recommendations regarding site work and design and construction of the proposed office building are presented below. EARTHWORK We expect that the any required site grading can be accomplished with conventional earthmoving equipment. The native site soils below the fill have significant silt contents and are moisture sensitive. These materials will be difficult to operate on or compact during wet weather. Operation of heavy equipment at the site under wet conditions can be expected to result in considerable disturbance to the exposed native subgrade. We recommend that earthwork be undertaken during periods of dry weather, if feasible, to minimize grading costs. Based on our explorations, we estimate that a minimum amount of site preparation will be required and will be limited to removal of existing asphalt parking areas and relocating nearby stockpiles.. Structural fill, where required, should be compacted to the densities indicated in the "Structural Fill" section of this report. In our opinion, structural fill can be placed directly over existing dense fill. STRUCTURAL FILL All fill beneath structures or pavements, and within utility trenches or other excavations beneath structures or pavements should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill material should be free of debris, organic contaminants, and rock fragments larger than about 6 inches. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 0291 -012-00 - ■ Segale Business Park December 9, 1998 Page 4 The workability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve. If fill material is imported to the site for wet weather construction, we recommend that it be a sand and gravel mixture such as high quality pit run, with less than 5 percent fines. Structural fill should be uniformly compacted in horizontal lifts to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD) determined in accordance with ASTM D -1557 (modified Proctor). Pavement subgrade soils and utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD up to within the upper 2 feet; the upper 2 feet should be compacted to at least 95 percent. The lift thickness used during placement and compaction will depend on the moisture and gradation characteristics of the soil and the type of equipment being used. If necessary, the material should be moisture conditioned to near - optimum moisture content prior to compaction. In our opinion, during dry weather construction, any nonorganic on -site soil may be considered for use as structural fill, provided it meets the criteria described above and can be compacted as recommended. If the material is over optimum moisture content when excavated, it will be necessary to aerate or dry the soil prior to placement as structural fill. FOUNDATION SUPPORT In our opinion, the proposed office structure be supported on shallow spread footings bearing on a minimum of 2 feet of compacted structural fill. Based on our observations, existing fill at the site is suitable for foundation bearing. In general, footings founded on compacted structural fill prepared as described above may be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and long -term live loads, exclusive of the weight of the footing and any overlying backfill. This value may be increased by one -third when seismic or wind loads are considered. We recommend a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous wall footings and 2 feet for isolated footings. All footing elements should be embedded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. We recommend that all loose or disturbed soils within the footing excavations be compacted as recommended, if practical, or overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill prior to concrete placement. Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of the footing and as passive pressure on the sides of footings, or where applicable, stem walls. We recommend using a coefficient of friction of 0.5 to calculate friction between the concrete and densely compacted native soil or structural fill. Passive pressure may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 400 pcf. This assumes that structural fill is placed against the sides of the footings. An appropriate safety factor should be applied to these values. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 0291 -012-00 z 1 ~w 00 to o. w= J I- w0 gQ wo ° 1— w Z zF- w no co o— o wW ra ..z =. O 1" Z Segale Business Park December 9, 1998 Page 5 We estimate that settlements of footings designed and constructed as recommended will be less than 1 inch with differential settlements measured along 25 feet of continuous wall footings or between comparably loaded isolated footings of 1/2 inch or less. Most of the settlements should occur essentially as loads are being applied. However, loose or soft soil below the footings or disturbance of the foundation subgrade during construction could result in larger settlements than predicted. SLAB -ON -GRADE SUPPORT In our opinion, estimated slab -on -grade floor areal loads of up to 250 psf could be supported on a minimum of 2 feet of compacted structural fill as previously recommended. We recommend that slabs -on -grade be directly underlain by a 4 to 6 -inch thickness of granular base course material consisting of crushed rock or well graded sand and gravel which contains less than 3 percent fines based on the minus 3/4 -inch fraction. If dry slabs are required (e.g., where adhesives are used to anchor carpet or tile to the slab), a waterproof liner, at least 6 mils thick, should be placed as a vapor barrier below the slab. A 2 -inch thickness of clean sand can be placed over the vapor barrier to protect the liner and serve as a leveling course. We estimate that settlement of a concrete slab supported as recommended above will be less than 1/2 inch over 50 feet. PAVEMENT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that pavement sections be supported on a minimum of 2 feet of structural fill extending to the underlying native sand and silt. Structural fill should be placed and compacted as recommended previously. In addition, the prepared subgrade should be thoroughly proofrolled prior to placing base course to identify any soft or loose soils. If soft or loose soils are encountered, they should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. We recommend the pavement in areas to be used exclusively for light vehicle traffic consist of 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete over 4 inches of crushed surfacing base course. For pavement in more heavily traveled areas or with significant truck traffic, we recommend providing 3 inches of asphalt concrete over 6 inches of crushed surfacing base course. The base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1577). Crushed rock base course should comply with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction Section 9- 03.9(3). These pavement sections may not be adequate for heavy construction traffic conditions such as imposed by concrete transit mixers, dump trucks or crane loads. Additional pavement thickness may be necessary to prevent pavement damage during construction, and /or repair of damaged pavements should be anticipated. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 0291 -012-00 Segale Business Park h December 9, 1998 Page 6 Asphalt pavement surfacing should meet the specifications for Class B asphaltic concrete, as described in WSDOT Section 9 -03.8. We recommend that it be compacted to a minimum of 92 percent of the theoretical maximum, as described by WSDOT Test Method 705. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that all ground surfaces, sidewalks and pavement surfaces be sloped so that surface drainage flows away from the building. We recommend that all roof drains be collected in tightlines for diversion into the storm drain system. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for Segale Business Park and their agents for use in design and construction of the various components of this project. The conclusions and recommendations in this report should be applied in their entirety. The data and report may be provided to prospective contractors for bidding or estimating purposes; but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. If there are any changes in the grades, location, configuration or type of construction planned, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report might not be fully applicable. If changes are made, we should be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide written modification or verification, as appropriate. When the design is finalized, we recommend that GeoEngineers be engaged to review those portions of the plans and specifications that relate to geotechnical considerations to check that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. The subsurface conditions are expected to vary across the site. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the construction budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by GeoEngineers during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should be conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 0291 -012-00 z z ..JU 0 CO w= J 1 N . w0 =w z� 1- 0. WI-, w U 0 1-`. ww I lii 0h z Segale Business Park ) December 9, 1998 Page 7 Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. 1EXPIRES,3J 70te ..1 DSP:GWH:vc Document ID: 029101200R.DOC Attachments G e o E n g i n e e r s Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. David S. Phelps Geotechnical Engineer Gary . Henderson Principal File No. 0291 -012-00 z z. 00 '(i) 0 •U) W W 2; 'J H; w °' F- W z �.! 1-o W Wi 0; • 00 6) —1. • 'w W` tot! . O, Z; • • F— 2 co 01 O '•]} CT E 0 s yj'. h.Y' .� }ii�.4 =7 v,• - Y' ... 188x111: i 196TH 191 �� 1I� • + :� �•..�� . LA .,4 • •�•. -• ; s Q� -■ 700 �TM�' lams g Jr. N sr 1 - L I f - 1 1 / i 5 . : , S 0 PAVILION MU 1 • • • r I N n 43RD $T n• 1 S MTh ST I ST _ I I � Ae 5600 S 1 6 of �• 3J t(j N I ,�, o' \ RfYf� N 1 4. 181 . fir A - S�Gr l x II li �Ci- i TTI. .. N...._. _ l\ 420 f!i s,�\ ,,,_ SITE S•1? / ,:.. -G., -� sr '1967 sr L .4 ck• / W A r7 R :..:.. 1 - S �s 13_ 190TH ST 1907H 600057 N ` = T23N:�� N T22N� — — _ ,L S 194TH N N -I-- 192X0 sr - - — 17• W a sr -J-1 ST sr 19/1N sr ALL l�srlAA N .., 99 N �. _ ..tY ♦ /4J, / ' ' O S � � ST ~M 5 1967 ST s6ao ` '1 W 3 e� 1 1 600 15907 ST ,� S 190TH /'3 ,, 200TH ST '► ' x 11 _ -- 2017H';' PL W i .....A0111114 a N C I `N; ��;, J Q N S -- L ti =02�0 v ti 1 ST .. - 1� / ST N 202H0 ST N !.I '�; STS [ ST T c $. S h ■ ---- N TH ST '< - L= 206TH ;c€m EX T" ° AI, �� !'�; SAINT 1� PAIRICKS / CEMETERY, i Alm 204TH aq i" _ 5 S 2097 + S : 0, Or / R sT 7 AM / ; 212TH 1 r�. s rIL7 12 �" sr . (� x167 1•R1 T 1 n 521ITN sT -- ^_I 5700 SUITES N vAA M7T'EI. 11 ENT 6600 ' 3 g = 5 216 H ST 191 ���c -a�" I -I 1 s_it -- „ ST— i J` �.: i .z .:.T.-if •IT ]A71114 PAW V t •. t- �11 :1'. 1 ST 3' S n � 220TH Y i W E 0 2400 4800 Reference: SCALE IN FEET This map reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. Geo Engineers VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 . File: L 99 -0020 5mm Drawing #1 t SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM . . MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Then 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL. FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL - GP , POORLY- GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL- GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY- GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOIL More Than 50% Passes No. 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit 50 or More INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH - PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT - CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Feld classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488 -90. • Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487 -90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count date, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. Geo Engineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM . FIGURE 3 • LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 1 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 28 feet 0.0 - 1.5 SM Brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (very dense, moist) (fill) 1.5 - 3.25 SM Brown silty fine sand with occasional gravel (dense, moist) (fill) 3.25 - 8.0 SP -SM Grayish brown fine to medium sand with silt (medium dense to dense, moist) 8.0 - 10.0 ML Gray silt with trace fine sand and organic material (stiff, moist) Test pit completed at a depth of 10.0 feet on 11/19/98. No ground water seepage observed. No caving observed. Disturbed soil samples obtained at depths of 1.0, 2.5, 8.0 and 9.5 feet. Sample moisture content is 5%, 22%, 13% and 37%, respectively. TEST PIT 2 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 28 feet 0.0 - 1.0 Asphalt 1.0 - 1.75 1.75 - 3.0 10-10.0 10.0 - 12.0 GP SP SP -SM Light brown sandy fine gravel with silt and occasional cobbles (very dense, moist) (fill) Gray gravelly fine to coarse sand with silt, occasional cobbles and small roots (very dense, moist) (fill) Gray fine sand with silt (dense, moist) Grades to gray sandy silt, stiff, moist Gray and brown silt with fine sand (stiff, moist) Test pit completed at a depth of 12.0 feet on 11/19/98. No ground water seepage observed. No caving observed. Disturbed soil samples obtained at depths of 7.0 and 11.0 feet. Sample moisture content is 12% and 38%, respectively. THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. 0291 -012-00 Geo Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE 4 z • Z IY W . 'C)O. • W • W= J 1_ W W O u-Q co > C5: Z_.- H O W~ Dp ON .W W' U, — O L11Z' U N Z ~ W C D J0 00 co o �) W w H WO L < c Z Cr F-W Z= F-- !- 0 ZI- W 0 O ( O 1- Ww .. Z w U= O 1— Z STEEL SQUARE POLES 5' SON - 2.3;a• 0.0. s 4.3r4• Tenon 5030 - Bolt•On Mount. 2•aoft Pattern SOP - Sauare Pale Too El 3'.39' Sal - No Mounting Holes .*/ SF - SIng1e Flood Pale Preparation Hand•hole 1r Optional Standard Base Projection Antcnor Bolts Foundation By Other • STEEL SQUARE POLES ...eel Square Poles frcr"., LSI Lighting Systems offer durable aesthetics to enhance your __ec:fied lighting design. For a look that lasts, specify LSI;cies. SPECIFICATIONS POLE SHAFT shaft is elec :rc•:velded 500 Grace C steel :._:g minimum yield strenc:n _. 5..::0 psi. On Tenon MC::: s:es :cies, tenon is 2.318' C.:. h:g-•5: :ength pipe. Tenon is - 'n length. Stra;gnt pc,:_ 273 - .: , and 6' square. HAND-HOLE hand-hole location s tZ' _:c:e pole base. Hand-e: _ 5 : :5 .s 2' x 4'. Poles 22' anC a :: a nave a 3' x 6' reinforce: hen :•ncie. BASE Pole base is ,1.ST .1•. -33 ct- rcllee steel plate vnth a minimum yie!o strength of 36.000 psi. Twc• :lece fabricate° scuare alur -' -um :a53 cover is optional. ANCHOR BOLTS Poles are furnished with, en :nor bolts featuring zmc•plated cog :le nuts and 'rrasners. Gai anize: anchor bolts are optional. Anchor bolts conform to AST ;.1 -;36 .:ito a minimum yield streng :o cf 36.000 psi. STEEL SQUARE POLES PCL E SELECTION CHART (a , 5" and 6" steel sc::cre ccies) Hegnt EPA Outside Malenat 3011 70 MPH 90 MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH Dimensions C:r:le 550.0 - 37 77 6 23.0 29.3 21 5 23.3 '6.7 32.3 31.0 .S 18.5 13.1 5 31.6 25.0 ?' 14.4 3.7 •3• 27.9 19.7 20• 11.0 7.0 20' 18.7 12.3 20' 22.5 1`3 20' 35.5 25.3 10.1 5.3 22' 18.7 12.6 22- 20.8 13.8 22• 34 0 23.9 7.7 10 24 15.1 9.7 24. 16.7 10.5 24• 22.5 14 9 24 29.6 19.6 4r 46.2 32.6 25' 5.3 2.1 12.0 7 2 25' 13.2 7.6 25' 240 15.8 25' 39.6 27.3 1 29' 9.2 4.9 28' 14 5 8.4 23' 19.9 12.5 28' 33.9 22.7 20' 11.2 5.7 30' 16.3 9.6 20' 29.8 18.6 35' 18.3 10.0 39' 115 43 - - 4• 5:'3 23.2 r S:'3 3 t6.a. J' 31'•3 3 12.3 3• S :•3 3 122 • 9.0 4 51'3 3 222 17.7 5' 51:5 $3 6.5 s' 5112 3 a5 us 3 5116 5 5.3 42 s' 5113 3 141 10.1 5' 5*12 C 42 2.2 4• St'G 3 3 e 5.9 4• 5073 3 10.5 7.0 S• 5110 C 184 134 5' 3070 '3 71 1.4 s• 51:0 3 3.3 5,4 1• 5o7G 3 3.9 5.S 5' s5 's C 17.1 12.0 5' 5o7G 0 IS - 4• St: 3 5:1 3.3 r 5073 3 52 3.1 5' S11G C 9.7 5.9 5' S1i4' 0 13.1 8.9 5' 5070 0 23.2 16.6 6' 5370 J - - 4' S11G 3 3.2 1.5 4 SOi3 3 73 1.0 5' S11G c 10.3 6.3 5' 5070 0 8.9 12.9 6' 5070 1.9 -. 4• 5070 3 4 2 1.2 5' 5119 0 75 3.9 5' 5070 0 35.f 9.6 6' 0070 J 1.9 - S 51ih• 0 5.0 1.1 5' 5o7G 0 11.5 6.6 6• 5070 J 43 - 6. 5070 - - 6 507G J Reel 1 EPA data sneer for c:moleta EPA Sean= '11- deflates sign red me 170.000 091. GROUND LUG Grcunc lug is S.u.• DUPLEX RECE ?TACL E :'lOate'rproof dL' ::ex ......acle is ccticnal. GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER Ground fault circ::it is 0 ::ideal. FiNISi-iES :Cie is fini5nec':it.h.. _ aGrio'. :i L °gating Systems' :._._2cnar/ 5358 Or 7akeC-7n finishing process. :o give 7: dole an ex73Cncnally ai:ra0:78 ._:de. The :, ccess eiecL :s:a ::La applies and :n.- .orally fuses a 75750:21 y ;':nice• :o the pole. This .7:cu3 crctec :lcn process :r0v:C0S an 1Vr=Tleiy smooth and anif :nil fini5n which withs :ands ex: :Sme 3 .i107,.hanges without :lacking or ceeiing. DuraGrio 5nisn features a •.:o-year limite0 warrens/. giar dard finish colors avaiia le for poles are bronze. black. ptabnum, c .,cca. buff, white. and green. Optional DuraGrip' Pius features added protection with a 3.0 to 5.0 mil thickness of polyester - powder tlnisn plus an inner coating. This ep =cially developed inner coating is a thermal plastic hydrecaroon resin applied to the inside of the pole to seal and protect against atmospheric and corrosive matter. OuraGrip Plus finish features a five -year limited warranty. Follow these steps to determine the Iuminaire /pole combination for your application. • Select lumiriaire from Luminaire • Refer to Luminaire EPA Chart • Select MPH to match the wind speed in Orcering Information. to determine EPA value. the application area. • Select tracket configuration. • Select Height of pale. • Confirm the pole EPA that is equal :o or exceeds :ae tuminairerbrac".cet E ?A as was previOeSiy determined. LIGHTING SYSTEMS A Division of LSI1ncuslnes 15573 = :.arce Roan • P C. 304 422723 • •C.ncnnali, Ohio 45242.3723 • •3' 31 793.325- • .4X 313! 981.1335 Z 6 00 No Ui = N IL W0 I'I 'ID W' H U. tL F- Z'. UN 0 Ir z • 1.* SYSTEMS STEEL SQUARE POLES BOLT CIRCLE `'t'a" 5'num 3' nun r rsn.are „ Material Height Mounting Configuration Pole Finish Options 2.8o11 Pattern 5110 - 11 Ga. Steel 3' 5- Sine:: 802- alone 3A -Galvanized AncaarScris uSC90 507G - 7 Ga. Steel 8' 0180'- :cove • BLX - ?lack SF - SingleFlaoo' HOBO 511H - 11 Ga. Steel ORDERING INFORMATION Selec: aopropriate cnoice from each column to formulate order code. Peer :o example below. Pale Sodas Material Height Mounting Configuration Pole Finish Options 2.8o11 Pattern 5110 - 11 Ga. Steel 3' 5- Sine:: 802- alone 3A -Galvanized AncaarScris uSC90 507G - 7 Ga. Steel 8' 0180'- :cove • BLX - ?lack SF - SingleFlaoo' HOBO 511H - 11 Ga. Steel 10' 090'- Dcuc :e PLT -Platinum 'F - CouoleFlaed' 55080 x 12' 0990' -Ocu :e CCA -Cocoa :GP - OuraGrip'Plus x Consult pole selection 14' 790' -Tide 81JF -Butt "3- Less AncnorSolis 090' Ohara on 000000e cage. 16' Mt 20' - Trole• WHT -White '10 -No Options 1 x 18' C90' -Cuao Gag -Green X X 20' 0090' -Cud 22' PA - Twin ?ardel . Sauare Pole for 26. PT - ?cla 7cp Mount Pole Top Mount 28, 4SOP 30' :SOP 35 • 550P 39' Square Pole far N- Tenon Mount . Tenon Mount 4509 (Stanoard:enon sae is 2' pipe) 350N , 6500 Souan Pole (No mounting holes) 4501 5501 EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER I 5SQBO. S07G 24 D180 PLT SF DGP 'See Flood Ughtlng Brackets-Bolt-On (page 62). ACCESSORY' ORDERING INFORMATION Description Order Number 48C - 4' Square But Cover 122559” 58C - s• Square Bast Cover 122561 •' bat -6' Sawn Base Covet 122563" ER2 - Weatnerpnof Duplex Recepnde 122564" 082 - Weatherprool Duplex Receptacle for 122566" Reinforced Hand -hole (Poles 18' and above) GFI - Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter 122565" 011 - Ground Fault Circuit lntereupter for 122567" Reinforced Hand•bole (Poles 22' and above) MHP - Mounting Hale Plugs (3 plugs standard) 132336 'Accessories are field installed. "Specify finish. DRILLING LOCATIONS 3101 •d• Sides A B C 0 Hond -hole X Single I X 0180' 1 X x DRILLING LOCATIONS 3101 •d• Notes: Consult beery for custom variations. Stance:15? and OF pole preparations are li=d 3N of the right oldie pole from the base. i All LSI Lighting Systems' poles are guaranteed to meet the EPA requirements listed. LSI Lighting Systems is not res:cnsib(e if a pole order has a lower EPA rating than the indicated wind- loading zone where the pole will be located. Caution: This guarantee does not apply if the pole/bracke :i fixture combination is used to support any ether items such as (lags. pennants, or signs, which would add stress to Ole pole. LSI Lighting Systems cannot accept responsibility for harm or damage caused in these situations. Note: Pole calculations include a 1.3 gust !actor over steady wind velocity. Example: ;ales designed to withstand 80 MPH steady wind writ withstand gusts to 104 MPH. EPAS are lcr locations 100 mites away,rcm hurricane ocean lines. Note: Humcane ocean lines are the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coastal areas. :, 6 00. CO La J �. u . W 0. u< ZC7. 1— =: Z I— O' Z ILI La U . 'O co. .0 L—. LLJ W'. I=— U L-0, L11 z. U= O~ z • • •'• fl 10" Aperture HIC 2ownlight Universal Rough-In -:using Housing Catalcc Numbs.: :-i1.3THID Round :.;:enure HID rough-ir..*:.:7-nr.ly protet:ed.. So:tacit far w:::nout or installa:::ns :on:lotion ls Ades and erom :cc rt focnire. • :0 iauge stamped 5:et: ;:ias:r with ix:: br:eke:.; .tesigr. ••• tby othert cr CHB-:i. Order • Frewirtr: jur.cnon cx wi:h : .114" priou: deteo:or. :tiow the • • Sallast :-.iy anci wir splice r:'.*:::..vired with plog•ir. yk baUas — order leo:travel's . • P:.1 roiled 5:ee: • in olas:er frzate • Fixed sock:: • Med:on...case porzela4-. • ORDERING INFORWTION Fixture Type B NRTL'C Naticnally reccgnizec tesarg latcratcri listed. Full compliance to :oth UL arc CSA sear For use in camp cr wet iccancns. HLSTHID roucr-r. hcluz ACCESSORIES - Must be ordered separately Ca1atogliumber- 12kercripfuNer CH8.25 Bar hancers BALLASTS Wattage- MInaiHaficte ligtrPrsure Sturtum- Mercury Vapor 50 70 100 150 175 LS-50.H9 L9.70-H9 L3.10-H9 nL3-15.H9 h13-17-H9 HLS-50S9 HL.5-70S9 HL3.10S9 fiLS..15S9 HLB-10C3 t. Us• ANSI M107 bailast. I tol F—A B kl.37H10 c D 1C.!25 1 24.0* I 12Z 1 11.75' 7.S7 7rn 610 rrun 1 05m 1 298 mm Nem l'•Vicrt • Hubbell ....:onting, Inc. • ‚ c L! Q • avr CC L[L. u. 1 ILL LLL CC is cam. oc; ac �. 10" Aperture HID Downlight Trims TRIMS: Damp Location Listed BAFFLES REFLECTORS 807A Scecular Alzak reflector 8073 Specular Alzak reflector 807G Specular Alzak :effector Clear 100W 150 HPS Black ICOW 150 HPS Gold ICOW 150 HPS 802 Baffle reflector Blacx 100."! 150 HPS 815A Specular Alzak reflector 8153 Specular Alzak reflector Clear 17W 175 MH Black 175W 175 MH 815G Specular Alzak reflector with safety lens Geld 175W 175 MH Specular Alzak ret!ec:cr 816 with mane black caffle and safety Tens LENSES Matte black 175W 175 MH 811P Flat opal lens White 175W 175 MH 806 Flush fresnel glass lens White .175W 175 MH WALLWASHER 810 Black baffled wallwasher White 150W 150 MH Hubbell Lighting, Inc. 210 Z L— W. W R JU �. U O cn w =. • J 0 LL... . N_ D. _ d. H =, Z :. Z W of U ip N` W; 2_ V 'LL H: Z; O z J CRAP7IIC SCALE “ l9• '91111) 1 meh - 81 n. mar/ / ,/ NNI:Z‘.1 .1 /9/71/ AC, 1 I.f '1 ^ . \‘1 \. f.:• '------- i ..... -.... / // / ). 1,,,/ 1 op „.• ! -''''''..--j"?'-'s-..,,,,.. 8. ,.„ ...,. C. P --i -",...■. , •,,,N.F. ...,„ .....,. DE1(0°" ,9,171.i',-. P 1Nv A/C AS MD., •!. 10 28.29 RATER MST. A/C • • 711018or PROPERIY trIE -EN.ARONUENT A 77:1 60' LON 111pAcT -.WARMAN; TELE, Pty, + INLET DIKE RACK RTAR E11600101E111 PAR10N0 CALCULATIONS: GROSS 01.1110010 SO. rt.. 16800 PUBLIC AREAS IWO 50. 8E1 SO. 0. - 15100 Prolarro REQUIRED • 3/1000 SO. 0. STALLS RE001RE0 • 47 STALLS PR80600 • 513 -,,• •- e "AL,E • SITE EARTIAroRK CUT ru NET 6016960 ril 05.) 619 867 -217 AREAS ACRES) .6 .6 ' RI 1AAT RUL 10 BE EXCESS WELL GRADED MATERIAL. MU THE 981 EKALDING WE PORft-Or MEE_ • memo CATOI 81(111 FIXTURE f IL. or !.(Wt REAR 100181A1ER EL. 7600 , • tkC-C-‘s1 RIVER WPROX. TOE Or RIVERBANK WAR PROTECTOR EASE0EN1S 5722051, 6077013. 6027015, 9110310987, 6011672, & K.C. RES. 1 31833 100 YEAR EL 3000 (00 YEAR 11.000 UNE 11(011 HON RATER LINE PROPERTY LINE RivER ENVIRONIJEHT LINE LUCE 001011 PORN RNIRBANK TOE INDS Or CONSIRLOTION 1ENCELRIE tosTING ((TICE z • a • re '6 5, _1 0 00 to w x: ;(0 0, LLI 1. 107 Z ui 2 D ! .. Z. w CO 1 0 ' Z ' PW Segale Business Park BLDG. 982 Plant List Ae15131 5G Jura 9000ld 23ason 22 P44 Pins, 9040 mows 5 clarion 19 ARO Arbutus undo compacla 5 goaon 21 POI Molina Iroteri 30 -36' 13/0 310 AIM Arcloslophrlos ono aei I goson 36 Rot Rhododendron Raseum Vegans 71 -71' 0/0 13 PH Pons Ilgro 1 RCN Rhododendron Corner Waterer 18 Pur Peres uounlun Ike 28 prr Orson Bann Borne 9 C0 Worn. b.11hl laslgbla 16 Cu Euonlmus mrt908.9900 .aregolum IO 90R rrarnus orysorpo Rpr•aod 31 CAC Cuonrmus 01010 Campocla 47 P57 Prunus Ioo,00oorue labelono 8 CA Coloneasler apcoleus 71 VD rburnum do.AD 101 CD Caloneosler dammed 86 CC Crko cornea 13 PAO Rhododendron Mnh )(rouge 6 11. Honey Locust 306 RC Rebus eoyeioddes 10. sol.per 21 -24 B/B 18 -71. 0/0 10 -7I• B/B 3 001704 I moon 5 Won 5-16• 13/6 gn0 110 gallon 6 -21' 6 -7' pot ��� Was V NJ 2119311E1716.1 1y17•{111880}110 17301/57/ 1- 6/15/99 1MIDSCAPIK ROM LtMEE 61110613 981 PWP1090 Lr( [06908* 10Gta¢ ^/ 1A'U•0A1) PAIp40h1 V INN .1 toSIAC roltt LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 . 30 MIS IUNWIIA. 00511NCION owl ek..r BUILDING 982 LANDSCAPE PLAN w,o.. 11 MONO .r. I* w a w 5N km I. • 3C, 3rot— /17/99 Z • Q Z' W. • J U: U0. U 0 . W: • W= • —I ! LL W 0: • LL j 21 a • • t- WW • i Z �. Z 0• 2 0 N 0 1- W W,. H IL' O: Z. • W 0 f—n Z • HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT LOW IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT 60' 40' i 100 YEA t,i_i6IISFIttNmGAii1RARE -4- 14EAN HIGH ; - -L-E1.0013. 66.30 1 , WATER EL. 26.4 25 -I 15 —10 5 ; 0 STA. 14 50 HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT 2001..___ ..---- - i g'IEVAIPA"-- LOW IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT 60' 40• 100 YEAR I-4-EaLga9..30 WATER EL. 21.4 20 15 . L __I STA. 0+75 eriirib% HIGH IMPACT ENVIRONMENT LOW IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMEN il El OINC :- N r G Vaill/1611104.,... --- 5 9 IZETE- - IV - - - - L L STA. 0400 jLloo YEATi ii 4ozo.tu.3o i WATER EL.28425 20 ---1 ID . GRAPHIC SCALE fa n we Oe ( 9 ROT 1 1 ineb be n PROPERLY LINE AI 3/11/99 - *00(0 ITSIRSIDC mutt 100' HIGH luPACT E100000101N1 40' RIAR EIN0011140111 SEGA LE BUSINESS PARK LANDWARD CATCH 100 YEAR P000000011. 3000 ur.AN HIGH .-- WATER EWE ELEV. 26.40 1111919/1. WASHINGTON Hee fn.:* WI/ 10P Of LEVEE BUILDING 982 CROSS SECTIONS O HArl. C. 141x P.L.S. NO. 15033 AfPROY. 10E Of RNERBUILL NOTES' VERTICAL (MIMI - BASIS Or DATUM IS A BRASS DISC SET RI A CONCRETE LIGHT SIANDMID Al THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Or S. 180111 ST. AND SOUTIICERIER pARvwAy. HARKED 754 RESET 2 1914) II0VD29 ELEVA0011 285 PAL 9825E0 611191919- 1117.91-- 50 ILORZ: 1.30' 2/18/99 ART: I .10 I••••• •••■•1* wu, 1 1 •••••Za% IMMO ENZIEE7E. TLIFIg 117111ENNISTAMITA .!•• ••., • 1.•• I•e•C •••1 t••••• • NOR II ELEVATION SC414. 14it'...V.Er' • ROUEN NM el _WEST_ ELEVATION Scsie 1 6 ,, • loco:a ft g•-• • T: r4 - Sr. COLC.113 CATIPM fl •11M4 L. ENNALial .1141CA ••■•*1. 16ST ELEVATION Sule. tnr•I'-efr -Ic.,�4,a P41 1111‘11.1. ilitre: itira MALI tadlati;I'd MN NEL' malmusEDI. 1 . 5 MINS•hE•••••■ SOUTH ELEVATION Seale. InVar.e" •••••••■••••• )•• 1....••••<, 6711 COOP.. x 982 FFOJ{ECT z 0 1- w z 0 I • u • • LAMC• YYULLI r: . . • • • • • A3 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR -- 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER 1mYtlM 4 01 11N rrm�n5bw9a Slim I/ Ob Mum mods oOm f011 01 110 1144 001 011000 110 hll 1/ IIOf wAw 1pn tl.} 14 1 M M110a Mow 11 A01 bplmlwlwehm 20.0413 11 414 ta.lM0Inf, *wan 01 MI /Iw11on11Yq 11 1.10 17 0 I ki,f u TW1e1 i013 Ilal 1wSwallooMawtS. NOMd qia rule 11 trl.awwm SW. 11 N 111nalumenralkia. 411000 1 G Isravyoy. I it 10 *me IOM 00 111 m Imam ist/ 11M K 0S boom ISL 11 Md 11ddratsMdtrade litl' S va Iyi 0*4*4 hq1 it ]OS K 111.4,41104 4pi ▪ 0 lc i-z re W ;J U: 1UOD N W. W= •J H,. W O. 2 . • cs • Z� Z0 D Q, • co. W W z T-: 0 File: L 99- 1 020 35mm Drawing #1 D!r. }u y 5 tr ,^s. i {• .w fi�.M r��i4`c; =i�,?4 KY ?� rn r;.^,- r. s iiii��i�i .liiii�iiii�iiii(ii�il.ri ��i�iiiiii.liilill:i:i� iiiil.iii► �:ilili�ii �iiilnii 0291012A.DWG 0 60 120 SCALE IN FEET EXPLANATION: 1* TEST PIT NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION Reference: Base drawing provided by Segale Business - park. Geo ,� Engineers SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 1 III�IIII�IIII ii (i111111IIII I1 i11)11 l.lil! 111 t1I1IIIUl1iiii1 1 1 lii i 1i1 1ii1 1il1i iiiiill�ilii,lilll�l)Illi,i 1.11-iliiii�