Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L98-0032 - CITY OF TUKWILA - WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY-STRANDER SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTL98 -0032 CITY OF TUKWILA West Valley Hwy & Strander (SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT A F F I D A V I T D I S T R I B U T I O N (1),C1N-cl, 3(Y\1 hereby declare that: O Notice of Public Hearing fl Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet []Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet jJ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit ccorej was aa ed to each of the following fDetermination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nons ignif is ance []Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action 0 Official Notice Other IV 1.1CC (1'r 1\??0±A;t1 Other O F betk\ke-7w^-e-s addresses on 00-52 ��g-)o1 Name of Project\ C- Signature File Number .*.S6tk\CA1.60Y1 Of g' Stc cAak �' TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT (JAN 22 '99 10 :47AM) TUKW��.a DCD /PW (AUTO) THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE FILE TYPE OPTION TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 061 TRANSMISSION 9 *5155595 02 OK ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION ' Facsimile Cover Sheet CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Company: Department: Phone: Fax: From: Company: Department: Phone: Fax: Date: Pages including this cover page: Barbara Grandon Seattle Times Legal Notices 464 -2185, ext. 4338 515 -5595 Gina Smith City of Tukwila Community Development 431 -3654 431 -3665 01/22/1999 2 Comments:Please publish the attached public notice, on Sunday 01/24/99. Thank you. 2, • J0. • CO UJ IL • Wp u.a r • • WW. w W -.o i•z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED JANUARY 21, 1999 The following applications has been submitted for review and decision. FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: L98 -0032 (Substantial Shoreline Development Permit) E98 -0014 (SEPA) City of Tukwila West Valley Highway, near the intersection of Strander Blvd. Installation of new 8 foot sidewalk Development Permit Land Altering Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application in writing. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file, at (206) 431 -3685. Anyone who submits comments will be a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The final day to submit written comments on this proposal is February 16, 1999 by 5:00 p.m. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431 -3670. A decision on the Shoreline Application is appealable to the Shoreline Appeals Board while an appeal on the SEPA determination is appealable to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z _I- W. o o: N w: 111 J H. wo u- Q. (o a, �i z� �o z F-, Win' ; 0 H .wuj`. U o: iu z 0 0 File: mm Drawing# .... �`.) �* ,..........._.. .. Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 To: Alice Kelly Department of Ecology Shorelands Division 3190 - 160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Date of Transmittal: 2/24/99 Date of Receipt: Type of Permit: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Applicant's Representative: Name: City of Tukwila Public Works Robin Tischmak Address: 6200 Southcenter Blvd. City of Tukwila Tukwila, WA 98188 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Is the applicant the property owner? Yes RECEIVED Location of the property: FEB 2 41999 West Valley Highway, south of its intersection with Strander Blvd. DEPT OF ECULUUY Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Description of Project: Road widening to increase the number of tuming lanes and to install curb, gutter and sidewalk Notice of Application Date: 1/21/99 Final Decision Date: 2/23/99 By: Michael Jenkins Associate Planner, City of Tukwila (206) 431 -3685 , _ I- . Z mow, U0 co wI 111 N LL w 0' LL j;: _a Z� z �` LU tu, M. w ur U. Z�. v (. _. z File: mm Drawing# W,. 6 U0: .:N O . 10 al: W =! LLB'. W 0; 'LL Q d; :Z Hi 1-O'; W La W U N, STATE OF WASHINGTON '-1 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ‘.) Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 0 8 1339 March 5, 1999 CflP 1/4/ z ‘ re al City of Tukwila Public Works Dept 0 1 ., 2' 6 D TabbiiiIiiehnial6 ' ''' -I 01 ...Will' 6300 Southcenter Blvd suite 100 w x, s — Tukwila WA WA 98188 . u) u.' w 0 Dear Applicant: Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L98-0032 TUKWILA CITY OF PUBLIC WORKS - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 1999-NW-10011 2,1Lizzo:4:11—Ii.:=. 2 D Ill Lu. D CY 0 W. g5 Y2 a 1.- o UJ a ,I a I- LL- Po, The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the • , Z 21-day appeal period, March 17, 1999. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by 0141: letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. - • z The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to widen West Valley Highway, south of Strander Blvd, to add turn lane and reconstruct sidewalk/curb/gutter, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on February 24, 1999. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, 4tA,C,E, Alice Kelly, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program AMK:amk SDP.DOC CC: Jack , Pace; City ofTukwila 0 • 'Bore . irie Management. Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTA.NTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L98 -0032 Status: ISSUED Applied: 05/22/1998 Approved: 02/24/1999 02/23/2001 Pursuant to RCW 90. 5L . a permit is hereby granted to: CITi' OF T LIKWILA to undertake the following development: WEST VALLEY HY & STRANDER BL INTERSECTION STREET WIDENING INCLUDING CURB/GUTTER/SIDEWALK. • upon the following property:. Address: Parcel No: Sec: /Twn /Rnge: WEST •VALLEY HY •&' STRANDER BL INTERSECTION THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL • BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITC A`3,SOCII TED WETLANDS. WHICH I'_, A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. • The falloW.i'riLl master URBAN program Provisions are applicable to this development: Develu'urnerit Durs.uari.t to thi;..per•iiiit shall-be undertaken pursuant. to the attached' terms and cord l tions . • This pe,r'm i t i s.°granted pursuant to ..the Shoreline Management Aot . of 1971 an nothirigiri th,i,5 per'm'it shall excuse the.al?L11 carat from compliance with any other. F,edera1 State or local statutes. ordinance= or regulations app l icab,'1,e, t0 this project. but not; inC6nsisterit with the Shoreline Management• . Act (Chapter 90.53 RCW) . This. permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW _90.58. 140(3) in the event the permittee falls tor. ccmply with the terms or r:ontiitions hereof. C7NSTRUCTION: PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED .UNTIL TWENTY -O,NE. ( 21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90. 5U. 140 (6) AND WAC 173:14-090. OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE .(21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCE T AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5) (a') r:b) i.c) Date: F:-4.2.c6. Z`� IcjT7 Steve Lancaster Director Planning Department. Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within twit year_ from date of issuance, per WAC 173-14-060. % Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 To: Alice Kelly Department of Ecology Shorelands Division 3190 - 160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Date of Transmittal: 2/24/99 Date of Receipt: Type of Permit: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Applicant's Representative: Name: City of Tukwila Public Works Robin Tischmak Address: 6200 Southcenter Blvd. City of Tukwila Tukwila, WA 98188 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Is the applicant the property owner? Yes Location of the property: West Valley Highway, south of its intersection with Strander Blvd. Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Description of Project: Road widening to increase the number of tuming lanes and to install curb, gutter and sidewalk Notice of Application Date: 1/21/99 Final Decision Date: 2/23/99 By: Michael Jenkins Associate Planner, City of Tukwila (206) 431 -3685 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 22,1999 Project: West Valley Blvd. road widening project File Number: L98 -0032 - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Applicant: City of Tukwila Department of Public Works Owner: City of Tukwila Request: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to widen West Valley Highway near its intersection with Strander Blvd. for the creation of an additional northbound left turn lane and to create new curb, gutter and sidewalk Associated Permits: SEPA determination issued February 17, 1999 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Right -of -way Zoning Designation: Right -of -way Staff: Michael Jenkins Attachments: A. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application B. Project location map C. Project site plan D. Project details E. Cross section profile F. SEPA determination, with supporting memorandum 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 =� "•. z o: w ug •D j0: rt s CO 'CO Ur ..w =_ ..w o 'Li( J; lL Qi N • = w, • ? Hi 1-0, Z w w; °. ;w —; w z; OF'' L98 -0032 - Shoreline Permit City of Tukwila Public Works Department February 22, 1999 FINDINGS Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (18.44.80) Any substantial development within 200 feet of any shoreline must receive a shoreline substantial development permit prior to issuance of any local permits by the City. The proposal by City of Tukwila is to widen West Valley Highway south of its intersection with Strander Blvd. The project includes the creation of a new northbound left turn lane from West Valley Highway to Strander and the creation of new curb, gutter and sidewalk. The project will be achieved through widening of existing impervious surface south of Strander Blvd. Portions of the project fall within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Green River. Attachment A is the application for a Shoreline Permit. Attachment B is the Project location map. Attachment C shows the project site plan. General Shoreline Resulations (18.44.110) 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying district The project will be located within the West Valley Highway right -of -way in the City of Tukwila. No specific land use regulations govern the project, other than the Shoreline permit requirements. The project will be required to follow construction standards adopted in the current City of Tukwila Infrastructure Design and Construction Manual. Any above ground structures to support the project must meet underlying setback and height limits for facilities or related infrastructure outside of the right -of -way. Attachment D shows details of the proposal. Attachment E. are cross sections of the proposal. • The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations: Right -of way projects are not specifically listed in the City's uses allowed in the low impact environment portion of the shoreline. The project will be occurring within this portion of the Shoreline Zone (TMC 18.44.140). The proposed improvements are located toward the landward and not the riverward portion of the shoreline. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structures protects or promotes the public interest. N/A 2 -. z Z: —J C.) UO .0) 0 wI V) LL: uio LL to a z� �0 z �- �• o O N: o�. O: El • • z L98 -0032 - Shoreline Permit City of Tukwila Public Works Department February 22, 1999 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit. No disruption of existing vegetation in this river environment is anticipated. 5. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. The project will include the creation of catchbasins that will be linked to the existing system in West Valley Highway. The existing system links to an outfall into the Green River. The proposed catchbasin system to serve the project is less than the 5,000 square foot threshold for requiring water quality features, per the City of Tukwila Storm Water Ordinance, Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 14.30.080(8). This information was included in the SEPA determination and supporting memoranda, included as Attachment F. 6. All States and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with Please see response to Question 5, above. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river shall be protected Wildlife should not be impacted by this project. 8. All perimeters of landfills and other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls, or other satisfactory mechanism for erosion prevention. N/A 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from Federal, State, County or municipal agencies. The applicant obtained a SEPA Determination of Non - significance, dated February 18, 1999, as indicated in Attachment E. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. N/A 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline 3 z ~Z • w 6 U0. N 0: N w, w= w O:. LL 0 • . ,z� • zo w w, D o U CO': .0 1- • w W' U Li: CY .. Z: w 0~ z L98 -0032 - Shoreline Permit City of Tukwila Public Works Department February 22, 1999 N/A 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the shoreline N/A 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner N/A 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel, unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. 15. N/A Notwithstanding any provisions of the Code to the contrary, removal of any cottonwood tree within the river environment, or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. No removal of vegetation is proposed for this project. Specific Shoreline Regulations The creation of new impervious surface in an existing right -of -way is not specifically governed or regulated in the Shoreline Zone. DECISION Approval of the application. Steven Lancaster, Director of Community Development 4 Feb. 23 1951 DATE .z _ -, • w; WV 00 0 cow w =, J � gJ S2 a • x w` s. 1--o z . 2 D. F-: wuj = U U. z.. U (o' O~. Z, ITY OF TL, :WILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION Planne Receipt Number FOR STAFF USEONLY.: File Number Project File SEPA File` 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: West Valley Highway / Strander Boulevard Intersection Improvements B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: The project area includes the street intersection of West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. and extends approximately 500 feet north, 700 feet south, 100 feet west and 50 feet east. ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: Tukwila Right -of -Way and Washington State Right -of -Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N/A Quarter: NW Section: 25 Township: 23N Range: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Robin Tischmak, City of Tukwila, Public Works Department ADDRESS: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila, Washington 98188 PHONE: (206) 433 -0179, SIGNATURE: DATE: s -Z2 -q8 ATTACHMENT A RECEIVED erne OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERM? CE.N'rER D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3 The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4 I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at Tukwila (city), Washington (state), on (Am 22. =p , 199 8 . Robin Tischmak, Associate Engineer (Print Name) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 (Address) (206) 433-0179 (Phone Number) -�'F'--- ,,t1L6/61A-R4-) (Signature) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. SSDPMT.DOC 5/22/98 rari:i,.•r .' %,i',' -: `G�rr,:;X.:_bd.. ::;:ist .v�%'i tid6.1 AStvjeu.:4a 2r :ici.xcir'.triivaut°s'rs7 •.n,�..�Mr ,:ry - �l.ra..rr :�...csEm.,:aw si:aa.«ax 3 E. CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: City of Tukwila and Washington State Department of Transportation Right -of -Way. F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Street Right -of -Way G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: Urban - Open Space Environment H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) West Valley Hwy. generally runs north -south between the Green River and combined railroad rights -of -way from I -405 to S 180 St. The properties along West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. at' the project location are zoned as part of the Tukwila Urban Center. The uses are generally commercial. I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed development: (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal.) $ 400 k - $ 500 k J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Northbound West Valley Hwy. at Strander Blvd. currently has three lanes two (2) through lanes and one (1) left turn lane. This project would widen West Valley Hwy. to the east (south of Strander Blvd. only) to provide two (2) northbound left turns to Strander Blvd. and two (2) through lanes. Sidewalk will be constructed on the east side of West Valley Hwy. south of Strander Blvd. K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) None L. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: Summer 1998 . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: Fall 1998 . (If project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates:) M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: No reconstruction is anticipated. N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): N/A SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 " 252Y' 3131 :•n teX " Al 4 O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): The streets included in the proposed work are both for public access. P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING /LOADING /STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high water mark.) N/A Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark.) None proposed. R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: Erosion control will be used during construction and disturbed areas will be seeded. II. TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 ` ^ "; :tiFJiF`oToxiflr.Yi+YeJ .:: `. 2k.� +` 5 i III. OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. ❑ Tukwila Conditional Use Permit ❑ Tukwila Variance Permit Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila SEPA decision date: ❑ Tukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood ❑ Ord. #1462) ❑ Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ❑ Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) in Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) ri Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife) in Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) inAquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) 10 Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) PERMIT # ❑ Other: SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 CkCS ":., APPLICATION DATE DATE APPROVED IV. A. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and /or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. December 1995 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT PRIORITIES: (page 53) Nos. 5 and 6 GOALS AND POLICIES: Goal 5.3 (page 57): Policy 5.3.8 (page 58): Goal 5.6 (page 61): Policy 5.6.5 (page 62): Goal 5.7 (page 63): Policy 5.7.2 (page 63). B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and /or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) Tukwila Comprehensive Plan December 1995 GOALS AND POLICIES: Goal 13.1 (page 151): Policy 13.1.2 (pages 152 and 153): Policy 13.3.3 (page 153): Policy 13.3.5 (page 153): Policy 13.3.8 (page 153)• Goal 13.5 (page 155): Policy 13.5.1 (page 155). V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commercial /development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 e11zw."4i dvriwai i` <r.wti c'zk?41S- . 6� 7 3. Preference should to given to commercial /industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. 4. Determine and consider the visual impact that the commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. 5. Encourage provisions for public access, especially visual and pedestrian, as an integral part of commercial /industrial waterfront development. 6. Design new commercial /industrial facilities and improve existing ones in such a way as to minimize wasteful use of the shoreline. 7. Encourage multiple use types of commercial /industrial development to provide public access and promote round - the -clock utilization of the shorelines. 8. Short-term economic gain or convenience in developments should be evaluated in relation to long -term and potential impairments to the desirable biological features of the river and its shoreline. B. PUBLIC ACCESS ELEMENT 1. Public access to and along the water's edge should be provided in new developments. a. Water- dependent economic activities should be designed to allow substantial public access to the shoreline. b. For non -water dependent economic activities, where permitted, the entire water's edge should be available for public access, consistent with private property rights. c. For multi - family residential developments, the water's edge should be kept free of buildings and fences with public access made possible. d. For a new single - family dwelling unit, the water's edge should be kept free of buildings and fences. • e. For other non - specified development, the water's edge should be available for public access. f. All public shorelands, except as noted in other policies, should be available for public access to the water's edge. 2. Any modifications or extensions to existing development should be designed to allow public access. 3. A trail system should be developed along the river. a. Trails should be developed for linear access through public shoreline areas. b. Access points to and along the river should be linked by a system of trails. c. The connection of other trails in the region to the shoreline trail system should be encouraged and developed. d. To assist in developing a trail system, incentives should be offered to property owners for utilizing set -back areas. C. CIRCULATION ELEMENT 1. Roadways adjacent to the shoreline should be designed primarily for slow- moving traffic that would provide for recreational activities. 2. Parking facilities should be located upland with provisions for adding pedestrian access to the shoreline. 3. Public transportation should be designated to facilitate access to and along the shoreline. 4. Railroads should be encouraged to offer their rights -of -way for multiple use consistent with a shoreline location and with public safety. SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 ...: f: 7: �_ s1" i�1�a� :.v.'•;C,jS!(ix;;Sl#'ai�kA�ra �� "' '"%�zht��^!i1'),+.�iidsiw.`'. a ie&43.}p",'1 *x+14. , LSir 4tigetifieit, r li '.. 'pa'c .i�h.' • ' 4+.�Si4'1 4 Y re4, 8 z ~w 6 �. 00 CO 0: w= — 1.— U) O u. w ga- w ?. y2 a. 1w Z E- O w ~' 2 0 N' 0 F- wW H u. O w z. U N. z D. RECREATIONAL ELEMENT 1. Publicly owned recreational uses should be enhanced and, when feasible, enlarged. a. The public should have first option to buy shoreland as it becomes available for sale, based on an acquisition plan with clear public intent. b. The opportunity for sport fishing in the river should be enhanced. 2. Recreational uses should be incorporated with other shoreline activities. 3. Those unique or fragile areas of the shoreline which cannot be maintained in a natural condition under human uses should be designed and maintained as open space for passive forms of recreation. 4. Views of the shoreline and water from shoreline and upland areas should be preserved and enhanced. a. New shoreline development should not significantly obstruct views of the shoreline or the water. b. Enhancement of views shall not be construed to mean excessive removal of vegetation. E. SHORELINE USE ELEMENT 1. Shoreline activities identified as being appropriate shoreline uses should be planned for and encouraged. a. Short-term economic gain or convenience in developments should be evaluated in relationship to long -term and potential impairments to the desirable biological and aesthetic features of the river and its shoreline. b. Preference will be given to those activities which protect and enhance the desirable features of the river, depend on a shoreline location, and /or provide public access to the shoreline. c. Shorelines particularly suited for a specific and appropriate use or activity should be planned for and designated. d. Multiple use of shorelines should be planned for locations where integration of compatible uses is feasible. 2. Relocation of those activities identified as being inappropriate should be planned for and encouraged. 3. Aesthetic considerations should be encouraged when contemplating a new development, redevelopment of existing facilities or for general enhancement of shoreline areas. 4. Planning, zoning, capital improvements and other policy and regulatory standards should not tend to increase the density or intensity of activities on the shoreline. F. CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. 2. Develop regulations requiring the maintenance of a buffer of permanent vegetation between developed areas and associated water bodies to improve the aesthetic qualities of the river, retard surface run -off, maintain constant water temperature and reduce siltation. 3. Promote linear shoreline access, especially pedestrian and other non - motorized types, in the areas close to population centers; such areas would also serve as buffer between water and developed areas. SSDPNIT.DOC 5/12/98 -11AWAW4A1 $, 9 4. Develop regulations for site coverage, building height, set -backs and density to insure visual access to water, promote interesting development and prevent encroachment over water. 5. Provide facilities for intensive recreational activities where the sewage disposal and vector control can be accomplished to meet public health standards without adversely altering the natural features attractive for recreational uses. 6. Evaluate the effect of proposed recreational developments on environmental quality and natural resources of an area. 7. Develop standards for preservation and enhancement of scenic views and vistas. 8. Outfalls and surface run -offs should be controlled to minimize adverse effects on the river. 9. Open space should be distributed along the river. G. HISTORICAL/CULTURAL ELEMENT 1. Protect and restore areas having historical, cultural educational or scientific values. 2. Access to such sites should be made available to the general public. 3. Visitors should be provided with clear identification and interpretation of historical /cultural sites. 4. Public and private cooperation should be encouraged in site preparation and protection. 5. Suspected significant sites should be retained. 6. Newly discovered sites should be kept free from other intrusions until their value is determined. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES A. ALL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT 1. The development minimizes impacts on wildlife & significant vegetation, sandbars, wetlands, watercourses, and other important habitat features are maintained through the proper location, construction, management of shoreline uses (5.9.1). 2. The development protects riverbank vegetation and, where feasible, restores degraded riverbanks (5.9.2). 3. The development mitigates unavoidable disturbances of significant vegetation or habitat through replacement of habitat & provision of interpretive features (5.9.3). 4. Streets, flood control, surface water drainage and sewer system projects, clearing /grading activities and landscaping are designed, located and managed in a manner that minimizes water pollution, provides erosion control, and protects water quality (5.10.1) 5. The proposed development does not appear to cause significant adverse impacts on flooding, erosion & natural resources in Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. within & outside of Tukwila's jurisdiction (12.1.6). 6. Capital improvement projects & private development are designed, located and managed in a manner which does not endanger public health, safety, welfare or capacity of river to provide Tong -term community benefits (5.11.1). 7. The development is designed and located to minimize impacts to habitat, vegetation, access, recreation, historical resources and flood control (5.3.2). 8. Where over -water structures or structural reinforcement of the riverbank is proposed, it is necessary for a significant long -term public benefit or water dependent use (5.3.3). SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 W*a:fit,W 'w��: 10 ■ 9. The proposed development reflects the river's historical role and protects the Tong -term public use of the river as historical resource, by providing for the identification, protection & interpretation of unique historic /archaeological features (5.8.1). 10. The public development is designed to reflect the river's natural features & community traditions (5.8.2). 11. (EXCEPT FOR TUC and MIC) The development is designed and located to provide for multiple uses; provide water enjoyment uses as transitions between river & non -water dependent uses; & to encourage efficient use of land through clustering, shared parking, mixed use, etc. (5.3.8). 12. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) The development reflects high - quality site planning, architecture and landscaping; and includes setbacks, buffers, height/bulk provisions for open space (5.5.1). 13. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) Areas included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides a trail for public access along the river (5.6.6). 14. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) Areas not included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides public access or a private natural area in lieu of physical public access (5.6.6). 15. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) The development maintains views of the water from the shoreline and from upland areas, through building height, bulk, modulation, windows, breezeways & outdoor spaces (5.6.8). 16. Where public access is provided: a) Access is designed and located appropriately in relation to the particular site conditions and private property concerns (5.4.2). b) Access is designed to be safe and convenient, and includes amenities such as benches, drinking fountains, and parking lighting (5.6.7), (5.6.10). c) Access is designed and located for diverse types and variable levels of intensity to minimize impacts on natural environment & private property (5.6.3); where there are issues of safety, security, personal privacy or wildlife habitat preservation, public access to the river is limited to appropriate levels (1.5.5). 17. Where appropriate, the commercial development provides a connection between concentrations of commercial activity and the trail network (1.11.4). B. PROJECTS WITHIN TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (TUC): (Meet this additional) The development is designed and located to encourage water enjoyment uses; to provide for multiple uses; to provide additional benefits such as riverbank restoration, fishing piers, boat launches, views, interpretation; and to encourage efficient use of land through clustering, shared parking, mixed use, etc. (5.3.7). C. PROJECTS WITHIN MANUFACTURING /INDUSTRIAL CENTER (MIC): (Meet these additional) 1. The development maintains or enhances existing visual quality; provides trees and landscaping as buffers; and provides amenities that enhance employees' enjoyment of river (5.5.2). 2. The non -water dependent development provides for multiple shoreline uses or provides mitigation for Toss of multiple use opportunities (5.3.9). 3. The development emphasizes restoration of riverbank vegetation (11.1.8). 4. Development on the east side of the river improves employee access (11.1.8). 5. MIC properties included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides a trail for public access along river. Where provision of a public trail would jeopardize site security or lot coverage needed for successful industrial operations, the development provides either a SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 is ..,.;:a';;; +r; -e'l .;, c c : i 'a4 ;F "• r i %i�fiNsn;r • btiS tak ;.%i5",;444' 3nb6rdL55. , .. • i tt5lf A 11 z �w ce UO cn J H co w, 111 0 2 g Q. =a w z� 1--0 Z I: • 2 w U co o o ww LI z U= o~ z public trail, private natural area, public access elsewhere along the river, or other commensurate off -site mitigation (5.6.9). 6. MIC properties not included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides public access or a private natural area in lieu of public access, or otherwise mitigates the loss of public access (5.6.11). 7. Development on the west side of the river improves public access, protecting owner's rights to reasonable use and enjoyment (11.1.8). 8. Development supports the Duwamish River becoming a natural feature amenity in the MIC (11.1.7). D. FLOOD CONTROL USES (Meet these additional) 1. Where feasible, the flood control project mitigates impacts on other shoreline uses, through restoration of trees & riverbank vegetation, public access, interpretive features, or other mitigation for Toss of shoreline multiple uses (5.10.3). 2. The flood control project is designed and managed to minimize impacts on trees, riverbank vegetation, public access /recreation and fish habitat (5.10.2) 3. Where feasible, flood control structures are set back from the river, with land areas between the water and levee set aside as open space for recreation or habitat (5.10.2). E. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS (Meet these additional) 1. Where the transportation project is located within the shoreline zone or within corridors identified as river cross - connections, it provides safe /convenient/attractive pedestrian, bicycle & boater access facilities for public transportation (5.7.2). 2. The transportation project is designed and located to provide for multiple shoreline uses, such as trees, habitat, public parking, boat ramps, biofiltration swales, public art or interpretive signs (5.7.1). 3. The transportation project minimizes impacts on the natural environment, such as noise, odors and pollution (5.7.3). SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 - Sw:3a'r.5'dl'Ji. a. inn" 4,:`S'v 41,.`,, T, • ixf4.1 : `.tn'�'<t4at. `waarx 12 Project Location ATTA►CHMEIVT B City of Tukwila PERMIT CENTER W Valley Hwy /Strander Blvd. Intersection Improvements 5/7/98 Vicinity Map File: crey-D03 Drawing# CITY :)F TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) .c DESCRIPTION CF PROPOSAL: 4ES7 VALLEY HY :11 !-TRANUER BL INTERSECTION WIDENING INCLUDING CURS/GUTTER/SIDEWALK. •PROPONENT: CITY OF TUKWILA RUBLIC..WORKS LocATIpm OF PROPOSAL. INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: 'ADDRESS: J'ARCEL NO: •SEC/TWN/RNG: WEST VALLEY HY & STRANDER BL INTERSECTION LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWI1A FILE NO: E98-0614 The City haS determined that the proposal does not have a probable slanificant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental Hnipact statemeat. (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030C2)(c). This decision Was made after review of a completed environmental -checklist .and other information on file, with the lead aaency. Thts -information IS available to the public on request. .4.**4****",A.A.*.k*""A".***4.,,,*.k*********,***,4,"*„,,,„„k*Nk*A.kkk4.* 414- • This determination is final and sianed this 19911'. ceve lancaster. Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3670 -.-63001Southcenter Boulevard 'Tukwila, 'WA •98168. day ,,..Copies.of the procedures or SEPA appeals are available with the •Department of Community Development. ATTACHMENT F — .-1;t9tX2,06.0'1;44ft:itt City of l ukwia John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins Date: February 16, 1999 Re: E98 -0014, SEPA review of application by City of Tukwila Public Works Department for improvements to West Valley Highway Project Description: This SEPA review is for a City of Tukwila Public Works project for road improvements to the Northbound lanes of West Valley Highway, immediately to the South of its intersection with Strander Blvd. The project will include the widening of the street on the east side of West Valley Highway. The project will result in the creation of a new left turn lane to accompany an existing left turn lane. A sidewalk will also be constructed on the east side of West Valley Highway as part of this project. As this project is to expand an existing right -of -way, a SEPA checklist would not be required. However, the project falls within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Green River, requiring a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The steepest slope in the project area is approximately 2 %. The soils are primarily silt and fine sand with no history of instability. Approximately 1,000 cubic yards of gravel base materials will be required for establishing new road surface. Silt fencing will be used where appropriate. • Air Exhaust from vehicles and dust may occur during construction. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 •iaf ,` ^+�:: ;4'�;w:Nnt4 .7L firn S i •,- :f• 54Yi A';i+.;(41' k • 'ir'•..:.i v tm �b�k�i", i V.& i ,». 1 ,. t . 4' i s .. . :Ea air '�ifc8ti�, .t'!ti^,D;ip??i�'4ts!rc�v " v�"+ Y, J; 1�vi�iac!' a �i 'Ja�i�'.k,�i'.sh'�ti'�7 "t,^'tt {'niki�'a5a'' °i3'v+�'�Ldin�,i!z�sYa'. ��.t 7an - fiN`it'5. z' few: 6 J U; U0. cnw J= H. � w w Oi g Q = Cy; �w z i...; H0 z I—! ILI al; U0 0. O H. w' H U U.. H • U CO. O • Z E98 -0014 SEPA Checklist - City of Tukwila Public Works West Valley Highway road improvements February 16, 1999 • Water The western portion of the project is approximately 70 feet from the Green River OHWM. Approximately 250 square yards of sidewalk will be developed along the east side of West Valley Highway. The Green River lies on the west side of West Valley Highway. No discharge of waste will occur into stream. The project includes adding catch basins and pipes to collect runoff from ponding areas on impervious surface, which will be routed to an exiting collection system that is discharged to the Green River. The proposed catchbasin system appears to be less than the 5,000 square foot threshold for requiring water quality features, per the City of Tukwila Storm Water Ordinance, Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 14.30.080(8). Siltation control measures will be used during construction. • Plants A grass strip will be removed for street widening. The area will be seeded following construction. Animals No known threatened species or migration routes nearby. • Energy/Natural Resources Electricity, Gasoline or other fuels may be used for machinery during construction. • Environmental Health Some short term noise will be generated during construction time period, lasting between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. • Land/Shoreline Use The project will occur in the right -of -way, but surrounding properties are zoned Tukwila Urban Center and Commercial/Light Industrial. No structures will be demolished. • Housing No housing is proposed nor will development reduce housing. • Aesthetics No structures are proposed. E98 -0014 SEPA Checklist - City of Tukwila Public Works West Valley Highway road improvements February 16, 1999 • Light and Glare No impacts. • Recreation The adjacent Interurban Trail and Green River Trails will not be impacted by the project. • Historic /Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. • . Transportation The project project will expand the right -of -way by the creation of an additional turning lane and a sidewalk. The site is served by public transportation. No new parking will be required nor will new streets or improvements to roads be created. Public Services Proposed development will not impact or require specific public services. Utilities The existing storm drainage system, owned and operated by the City of Tukwila, will be modified for this project. Recommendations: DNS Environmental Checklist WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY / STRANDER BLVD Tukwila, Washington Prepared for City of Tukwila RECZWED CITY OF 1'Uiiv, ILA MAY 2 2 1993 PERMIT CENTER (206) 433 -0179 May 12, 1998 • ...... .......... J..+ i..,....,.. r.:...,,..,,.. a, n..,,,,. 1+ 4t.4x,!<...h ?:.k`:l..ons+. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: �.Z• The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental r4 2 agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An 6 environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable v o • significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is w to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to ' Ili I reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide co u whether an EIS is required. w o INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Z = Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of 0 your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with z ww the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. 2'o. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In o most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project w w. plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question v. does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to = O the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. ui �' Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark z designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply ". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project ", "applicant ", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal ", "proposer", and "affected geographic area," respectively. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131197)1 jc 1 YH4-.4. :4y:elil:Y :iihIV.ia• `` x' .........0,gCflCS iw `i bL bNA, Q di1%x`a :.{3 'i. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: West Valley Highway / Strander Boulevard Intersection Improvements. 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila, Public Works Department 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: • Robin Tischmak 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433-0179 4. Date checklist prepared: • May 12, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Advertise late June, 1998 and construction during the summer of 1998. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: A Shoreline Permit application will be prepared and submitted. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Permit Required Shoreline Permit 960061 Reports Sepa (10131197)1 jc Review Agency City of Tukwila 2 • rsw.ta.trotwsvr-roknworirrov .A.mrettrAiltraNtIM,`.:NIV.Art.stiti17.9=9:-AWEIMatif.7.4.511,1MO:;74 ... , 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Northbound West Valley Highway approaching Strander Blvd. currently has two (2) through lanes and one (1) left turn lane. This project proposes widening of the street on the east side of West Valley Highway south of Strander Blvd. to provide an additional left turn lane to westbound Strander Blvd. There would then be two (2) northbound through lanes and two (2) left turn lanes. The project also includes modifications to the traffic signal at the intersection and construction of sidewalk on the east side of West Valley Highway from approximate survey station 166 +60 to 172 +25. The proposed use is for vehicular and pedestrian traffic and would occur within street right- of -way or easement. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the NW 1/4 of section 25, Township 23N, and Range 4E, W.M. The project area is the intersection of West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. and extends approximately 600 feet north and south. See figure 1. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/91197)1 jc 3 ' :?=KC:, i; ;:u7:s imx i,r4 i ,1AmlteF01,4•.{+4i"i,YiX};i..EF a'�u.am` kilt .:u+'%i�f""riiltl%$�;ir'is�,�5 M444;iv'�?tv"airv,2G^"*44. l az'hf^`dig4 Figure 1 City of Tukwila W Valley Hwy/S.trander Blva Intersection Improvements 5/7/98 Vicinity Map 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131/97)1 jc 4 k. .4 ;AM V.k-43.4.3iAveiast:F,4,4;ge'ilAr*IWi441,,:ife.4!43.::441%v•4*, z z w n„. 6 C.) 0 u) W• I • o. U) IL= u. < I w z 1-- a z • ILJ: 2 a 0 a' co, ,0 .c1 w • I. 0 • t := 0 rz /-! z Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slopes are approximately 2 %. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. z w' 2 ug D J U. U 0: N0, w= H' wO 4a; Generally, the soils consist of a loose silt with fine sands over a silty = 0; xw z 1-0- d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the z �. 11J w' U C No. ;0 ux ,o e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling Uw 0H z fine sand over a soft elastic silt. immediate vicinity? If so, describe. or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There is expected to be some fill material imported for the sidewalk and street widening on the east side of West Valley Hwy. south of Strander Blvd. The fill will consist of gravel base material from an approved gravel pit that will be used to construct the subgrade for the roadway and sidewalk. The fill in this area would require about 1,000 cubic yards of gravel borrow. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Very minor erosion due to surface water runoff may occur during construction of the project. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ? The existing site is approximately 85% impervious and will be approximately 90% impervious after project construction. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131/97)1 jc 5 • ;a..:':rr.. .:1 „�:'.i J kTm7l . �•!"X,al, t aiK+'s,:Eai- ,sty;ii: � 7e°,'G .4iti ?: ^i is : sti,,,,,t4:k'it,crl:R.m.3.x..a x ' c� ; ��. * t� � / . � n y 't•y x � � Y�.EtA�.'s�a4ri:`�f5�+. "�`7s�r.�rs'ii e, L� •rF�C••�'s:+'pxa ;�c�`:'+�.�,�: ; � +�i*x.k��t''u'�h�r. "�ri..it�.�J +�.#�'';7�G t •+� ii .f : AYN ?�dil.W3Vw?C%d}Y{taxz�J�v. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fence will be installed where practical and filter fabric will be used to cover catch basin inlets to collect minor erosion during construction from surface water runoff. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary dust, odors, and emissions from construction equipment and paving operations would be generated during construction. Vehicle emissions should be expected to slightly decrease after construction due to more efficient operation of the intersection. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Watering and street cleaning will occur during construction to minimize dust emissions. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Near the south end of the project, the edge of the roadway is approximately 70 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the Green River. The Green River turns into the Duwamish River and empties into Elliott Bay on. Puget Sound. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10131/97) \jc 6 ;., , ti .S s_.`k ., .t+ vk,u .��i..mi,.„r a:ks'; t�S +•Me' <5)Fa r Shi.= ti�ivir';.l si i9i xcw...__.a �, wrt�5�d g*fiijii"e:*:!itwr CtS:qt i;7 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project would construct approximately 250 s.y. of sidewalk along the east side of West Valley Hwy. within the 200 foot buffer. Seee attached plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. 96006 % Reports %Sepa(10/31 /97)1jc 7 htr. �N'a4rSxCswrnw.wnu- M.+fid'•�'rG (,V*" ^4.'SOr �nT�i�ixmw .w:wa.c�u.i.f4 +a.+a..s..�. ••• -11:4Waegsg.., Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The storm water runoff from the street is collected through catch basins into a piped collection system and discharged to the Green River through an existing outfall. This project includes new catch basins and pipes to collect runoff from areas where ponding is occuring in the street. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Possibly. Soil from erosion and sedimentation during construction could enter surface waters. This would be minimized or precluded by the use of siltation control measures. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Silt fence and filter fabric will be used to minimize sediments being carried away in surface water runoff during construction. 4. Plants Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree; alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree; fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants; cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A narrow strip of grass wil be removed for street widening and sidewalk on the east side of West Valley Hwy. south of Strander Blvd. 960061 Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc 8 :4 4t.tEEJ'v7., z re 2 6 J U. 1 N0. CO W w =: J 1-: N w 0: g J; .na I- ILI z�... 1- 0 Z Q, U ON CH- wuj 1- u: F- - O. ui z ow O:~ Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The disturbed areas would be seeded with grasses upon completion. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. • Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity is currently used to power street lights and the traffic signal and will be used for any additional street lights. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10131197)1 jc u..0,Z,i. :.' a *, ;Y Ift.W Y, Z4Cl iV re; 3'M.4V.P5.Mr2W.Yacurunwi....... — • 9 z }- w I.) In IL: .W O zm`. W W' • U N:. O 0 H? z: • ~O F-! Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing noise in the project area is due primarily to vehicular traffic. This project is a street improvement project which will not be affected by existing noise in the area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction activities would cause a temporary increase in noise levels between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Long -term noise levels will be the same as what currently exist. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: This project will comply with the requirements contained in Tukwila's Noise Ordinance. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc 10 ,.. .F,,, ..•,,. ?. �.. .: �h. ...�:an -.., a,n - <b:tdh7r.i, �i�,jnH.�,. o:: , x�.t��c- :�u?i'fk -.�i lt.u.� 25.K977 Wa\'zhnPA' :.sfih- z. mow. U; UO: cn w=;. w N = o'. tu z z �. 11J w O tn; w w _ z` Iii I-- OH z 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is the intersection of two (2) arterial streets. Adjacent properties are used for commercial businesses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is street right -of -way. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Street Right -Of -Way. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program • designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. 960061 Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc 11 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 5; vo 0)0: • U.1 i; 1- w a' • Nnar uj F- o; 0 N'' ;0F_` w 0; ui z' • _ 0 F. z k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics . What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Three (3) additional luminaires for visibility at night are proposed. 96006 \ Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97) 1 jc 12 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Street lights would be directed toward the roadway and would be designed to minimize Tight directed toward adjacent properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Interurban Trail to the east, the Green River Trail to the west, and Bicentennial Park is located to the west. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No: b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. 960061 Reports \ Sepa (10131197) \ jc �r,1� » \:. _,:3,r,;�;d..,?L::i: tat.•.< d' �w' r5; �*++ 5! L�':: n!:, �sttl5 :e"�G:i?ei%!3KtYxn,+....,.._.. 13 HW {J U; 0 0; N0; cnw, w= w0. u. w. z� 1-O w D o: w Z. 0(. O E.' Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is the intersection of two arterial streets: West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. There are two (2) bus zones within the project area. One is located on Strander Blvd. west of West Valley Hwy. for westbound traffic and the other is on West Valley Hwy. north of Strander Blvd. for northbound traffic. rw' 00 U) w: w z. w O` 2 g J: u =a I- L11 Z LLj 2 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How o . many would the project eliminate? O N o F-; w w` d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally v _'. describe (indicate whether public or private). p No parking spaces would be created or eliminated. No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. The project is a transportation improvement project. 96006 \ Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97) 1jc ..; kG�'''.hte -'i3 �'i! <�.x. >::�Ss ^la Ci'iii:•Y'42;;ti'A3+r�rnw... 14 ...wn, wrners+u?!�.V.7s ��'diiri i `� ?Y.�:ffu rc$�s u?'lib'a.'rti�:kMis aC�.+Kt?tSLk?.V 1.a:.;J;7;3.^bi,,I,V.A£. AII7Fn' 4..)ilTr.`iMle• 1 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are proposed. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Storm Drainage b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Storm drainage will be modified to pick up areas of ponding in the street. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131/97)11c 15 Evaluation for Agency Use Only W�, 6 0 ww! W =_. ■ w0 2 g- u. a: z r~. w w, iO N" uj .CU vji _; . O~ Z C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97)1jc iV1A-Y 2.2 � Iqq< 16 ; i.^,::.. zis; i.? Y:::ti'aricCds�:r.;, °,�;�.e:i dv �:•:t.L, r;i5• %i gti`�' Q •_ �W;_ JU COW: W =: F. CO s, W 0 2 N D. Z Z0 LU D OH. W W; O t1. Z .0 N O~ 'z E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALA:; PROJECT AND NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The proposal objective is to provide adequate left turn storage from northbound West Valley Hwy. to westbound Strander Blvd. The existing left turn lane does not have adequate storage for the number of left turns and vehicles back up into the through lanes causing safety problems and delays. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Lengthening the single existing left turn lane to meet storage requirements is the other alternative. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Lengthening the existing single left turn lane would require widening of West Valley Hwy. further south than dual left turn lanes. This widening to the south would be severely impacted by the close vicinity of the Green River causing much higher design and construction costs as well as severe impacts to the Green River itself. The preferred alternative (dual left turn lanes) provides more storage and left turn capacity during the green signal period. It also can be constructed without causing severe impacts to abutting properties or the Green River. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97) \ jc 17 ....,..,.u,a.;aum a3G''�: += �:WNi ?y`w•' wbi4x+ :+�'7l +nd. 4 1r'+:tus 3s?ii�• "t..3� :'Ss�r:: z F...u. c g' 0 0. CO 0 L1.3 =: H, w0 �w z z o ww Do o0: o ,- w; 1- p` z O 1--. Z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED JANUARY 21, 1999 The following applications has been submitted for review and decision. FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: L98 -0032 (Substantial Shoreline Development Permit) E98 -0014 (SEPA) City of Tukwila West Valley Highway, near the intersection of Strander Blvd. Installation of new 8 foot sidewalk Development Permit Land Altering Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application in writing. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file, at (206) 431 -3685. Anyone who submits comments will be a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. The final day to submit written comments on this proposal is February 16, 1999 by 5:00 p.m. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431 -3670. A decision on the Shoreline Application is appealable to the Shoreline Appeals Board while an appeal on the SEPA determination is appealable to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 +?: ?, ii:, 5•, �, �4i`,''.` �cC:; 1;^ r5±t w+:? i. �ka�51i" si5, a= �:`+: YF, Cttiti:'. 4> nti� '��A;'i!9!s:±nti.w^4a!;,5.exu nw 77 •Sta r R111`31i! bH.i'FQFL A Jt?GT4tIAR, TO: Robin Tischmak FROM: Michael Jenkins DATE: January 21, 1999 z. . Z • • 11J MEMORANDUM • -J 0 • • • 00: • (013■•••• • .0111i • uj0; 0 , • la. . • • E O. • .:11J a • D; • • 0;,. • • • • .10 : • CI 1.7 • ILI a • • 1- . will keep you posted if there are any questions from the public that arise. • • • . •• • Thank you for submitting the plan and I apologize for the lateness in my • .„. ••••,. response. • ..• 1:317-•• • •• • • z • • • RE: Shoreline Permit and SEPA checklist for sidewalk project along West Valley Highway near Strander Blvd. (L98-0032 and E98- 0014) You submitted a revised site plan on December 24, 1998. The site plan that you • submitted will make the application complete. As you are working in the right-of- way, no site posting is required. The Notice of Application will be published in the Seattle Times and distributed to the library and other public places. The comment period will stay open for a period of 21 days, following which the SEPA and Shoreline Permits may be issued, pending any public input. '7 41 4-1 " • TeekrAteadoiC ARtifig, )EXPIRES 6/2o/9, W. VALLEY HIGHWAY/STRANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LocHNER 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 4-1 " • TeekrAteadoiC ARtifig, 0 SCALE IN FEET EXPIRES 6/20/ %% W. VALLEY HIGHWAY /STRANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LOCHNER I EXISTING SITE PLAN FIGURE 1 Z W Ce J U' CI t CO C. W 11.1 J H V) LL, W O g J. Ll < D W. ZH F- O Z F- W uj O D- UC 0 F-': W ui H U'. H LLO 0 H O Project Location City of Tukwila W Valley Hwy /Strander Blvd. Intersection Improvements 5/7/98 Vicinity Map l 'ti:?�i::'•w'keii�" fiFS 9C t i dx� ei4? ih .i: \4tt✓dl z �Z. W QQ• om' J U; O 0 w =. J H. N W • }Or J N Dn. = . W z 1- O AU Lit z I-. • p: o N I-: WW 1- - - O: 0 1-:. z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L,cg'cc 5-z LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building lia')slanning lublic Works El-Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. R--Parks /Rec Project: 1-.."1-2._ --- L Address: Date tt transmitted: L� y �-` 1 °t t �j Response requested by: t�2 tub t t . Staff coordinator: -<161,-)e--4 1'`-' s Date response received: Co A -A r t."7 -EN ,E cry/ P i "uT ► V'OMMENTS ( A j�i�. a�1 �-- f S- L c G �-1 -% =-�.t� i 4�� r,cl 1:1. pq r-cC' ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: & (.l jc Comments prepared by: 03/14/94 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Robin FROM: Michael Jenkins DATE: June 17, 1998 RE: Shoreline /SEPA applications for West Valley Highway /Strander road improvements (L98 -0032 / E98 -0014) Based upon my review of the submittal as referenced, DCD is finding the application incomplete. What will make the application complete is a submittal that includes the following information: • A site plan drawn to 1"=20' or 1"=30' scale clearly showing the area of construction and the proposed improvements. • A survey over the entire construction area at the same scale as the site plan • Shoreline profile cross - sections over the construction area, at 75 foot intervals have included a copy of recent Shoreline Permit submittals as an example of complete applications that have been accepted by the Department of Ecology. While the construction drawings that you provided give a good picture of the proposal, they are not of the quality that the Department of Ecology would accept. Due to the public comment requirement, the technical level presented in the 50% construction drawings may be difficult for the general public. I hope you find the examples helpful when preparing new conceptual plans for SEPA and Shoreline review. ✓ • ,) er et � t6 t !�, Gr k 1,-2 1.11 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 «411'. °iii` City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number Lq Od�Z LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ErFlanning Erfublic Works EtTire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. E—Parks /Rec Project: V--.04=1-A, t r ~,�,Lpl.1 �� .- G .h r---) a k, w;v1--/ s:W cry v a 11 d 4-t. -• Date Date transmitted: ■i 1 °t Gt 6 Response requested by: 12- 1 u- t Gi. '' Staff coordinator: CT -6 - /•-' Date response received: ❑ DRC review requested Plan check date: El Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Comments ore eared b 03/14/94 . ;`;�it�' 5.: ;; L7'F�•vi`�`��: i'L:;+ ti�tit: ���' r :"+ihi %1•^fi`�E'� §.G "'inYr;�ji', z . et W 6 U0. W=. w o` u. a z� F-- o Z 'o ==; CI �. w W+ LL o. ..z. w O~ z c ITY OF TL 'WILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development (DCD). Please contact the DCD if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until the application is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vesting of the applicant's rights. However, submittal of these materials in no way limits the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. The DCD Planning staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: T Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application LJ / Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) in Shoreline Permit Application Fee ($550) lJ SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) Design Review Permit Application (if building permit required) (6 copies) ($900) Utility Permit Application for Flood Control Zone (4 copies) Utility Permit Application for Storm Drainage Review (4 copies) RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER PLANS [Six (6) copies of the following]: L'7 Vicinity map showing location of the site. re Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's property ,/lines. LrJ Survey at a scale of 1" = 20' or 1 " =30', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the surveyor with surveyor's original signature. The following information must be contained onjhe survey: J Property dimensions, lot size and names of adjacent roads CO Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels CJ� Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment CJ Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffers (TMC 18.45.040) Existing grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% tt,katkvf,*,a,+PaYTI' z re W` JU U O; (N!) W Wz J�. W, W O: ga- J • ?. co W Z �. o z� uj UO O co, o F-`. W W. I=-- 0 F. w U= O ~. z CRr Existing trees over 4 ".irk diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved PI/Sho eline profile cross - sections at minimum 75 -foot intervals along site's shoreline, showing: CO Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and ase flood elevation (100 -year flood) Proposed structures /improvements O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark Distance to federal projects and navigation channels Limits of the River Environment, 60 -foot Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment 4/ ,Existing and proposed ground elevations Cr Plan view location of shoreline profile cross - sections Site plan at same scale as survey, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of th architect. The following information must be contained on the site plan: Property lines and names of adjacent roads Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) mits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffer widths (TMC 18.45.040) Proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond the subject property's boundaries, a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% Or Construction limit lines, and areas of clearing /grading /filling - Notations identifying source, composition, volume (cu. ft.) and extent (acres) of any fill material - Notations identifying composition, volume (cu. ft.) extent (acres) and proposed disposal site of 0/Erosion any extracted material control measures and tree /buffer protection measures (e.g. barricades, fencing). O Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with required setbacks O Lowest finished floor elevation O Location of driveways, fire lanes, parking, loading and service areas, with parking calculations and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening Or Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas O Location of site furniture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art O Location and type of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications, including any trail easements O Dike /riverbank maintenance easement (min. width: 30' riverward from catch -point of levee) Cl Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of tilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications Conceptual storm drainage plans with storage, detention and water - quality improvements (see tility Application requirements for Storm Drainage Review) t3 . Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences z �w U0 No wI NO w J Y a, z �— 0. Z I-- � • o 0 N: 0 ww • U p. -0 • Z UN 0 '2/Landscape/planting plar -'t same scale as site plan, with north ar--w, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the ,_..Idscape architect. The following infon,.ation must be contained on the plan: O Existing trees to be saved by size and species O Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing O Location of service areas, vaults and mechanical units with proposed screening. ❑ Building elevations and floor plans at a scale of 1/4" = 1' or 1/8" = 1' with graphic scale and date. Each sheet shall have the license stamp of the architect. Include on the elevations: O Dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements O Location and type of exterior building lighting O Location of mechanical units with proposed screening O Floor plan and square footage for uses L_"1 One (1) high quality 8 1/2" x 11" reduction of the above plans. If the project undergoes significant changes, an additional set of reductions may be required. 2/APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO SHORELINE PERMIT QUESTIONS & DESIGN POLICIES Written responses to attached Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application questions and Shoreline Design Policies (6 copies). ❑ OTHER MATERIALS Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate, such as color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to be considered, eight (8) copies of each must be submitted (except models). Color drawings or photos may be submitted as 8.5 x 11 -inch color photocopies. LJ PUB IC NOTICE: King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject property. Cl/Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings—e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included.) See Attachment A. O A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on -site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B. ITY OF T( Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION < FOR >S:TAFF: USE ONLY:: : Planner :` eceipt Num. I. PROJECT BACKGROUND File Number Project: File ;SEPA >File: #; A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: West Valley Highway / Strander Boulevard Intersection Improvements B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: The project area includes the street intersection of West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. and extends approximately 500 feet north. 700 feet south, 100 feet west, and 50 feet east. ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: Tukwila Right -of -Way and Washington State Right -of -Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N/A Quarter: NW Section: 25 Township: 23N Range: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Robin Tischmak. City of Tukwila, Public Works Department ADDRESS: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila Washington 98188 PHONE: (206) 433 - 0_1779 SIGNATURE: &Ii / J DATE: 5-ZZ -98 'riJ'X�L%e°.t +tS ia::A`4 ''f.1xi3.GAK;.xii,. '!; ` ar." sN;;s+F ,.: o %itEi,' ; &`•"r. 14" 4. iS:vn ` ?. Ui3.as3 . Awe1404 . '1/4. A ili "gAP'" " ..p,, RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3 The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4 I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at Tukwila Mt1/4W1 22"-a- , 199 8 . (city), Washington (state), on Robin Tischmak, Associate Engineer (Print Name) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 (Address) (206) 433-0179 (Phone Number) "Rd`—: Tid:d1( (Signature) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. SSDPMT.DOC 5/22/98 3 1 E. CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: City of Tukwila and Washington State Department of Transportation Right -of -Way. F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Street Right -of -Way G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: Urban - Open Space Environment H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) West Valley Hwy. generally runs north -south between the Green River and combined railroad rights -of -way from I -405 to S 180 St. The properties along West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. at the project location are zoned as part of the Tukwila Urban Center. The uses are generally commercial. I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed development: (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal.) $ 400 k - $ 500 k J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Northbound West Valley Hwy. at Strander Blvd, currently has three lanes. two (2) through lanes and one (1) left turn lane. This project would widen West Valley Hwy. to the east (south of Strander Blvd. only) to provide two (2) northbound left turns to Strander Blvd. and two (2) through lanes. Sidewalk will be constructed on the east side of West Valley Hwy. south of Strander Blvd. K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) None L. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: Summer 1998 . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: Fall 1998 . (If project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates :) M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: No reconstruction is anticipated. N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): N/A SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 i:):rsY',3,Q'i;;Vay:_C 1;Y:`vii:Ta Y:,.VW' S+%'1Li24viJra '�$o* z Z 1- W' 6_. —J C.) UO w 111 J N u- ill O 2 J• ll Q'. I— _ zF I— O Z I- w 2 U �. O N; O I- w w O w z V =; O~ z O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): The streets included in the proposed work are both for public access, P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING /LOADING /STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high water mark) N/A Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark.) None proposed. •. R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: Erosion control will be used during construction and disturbed areas will be seeded. II. TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPNIT.DOC 5/12/98 IftweaamifiagtlalikaaakitiC k4' fib h4Y`- Yo. 't kaki, t. ° t 5 III. OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. PERMIT # ❑ Tukwila Conditional Use Permit ❑ Tukwila Variance Permit Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila SEPA decision date: ❑ Tukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood ❑ Ord. #1462) ❑ Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ❑ Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) O Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) ri Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife) ❑ Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) O National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Aquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) Section 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps ❑ of Engineers) ❑ Other: SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 APPLICATION DATE DATE APPROVED 6 z w: 00: co 0: J I' (O IL: • wa O; a. d, 1=- 2. Z E- 0 'Z1- 111 ui .N D. 0 (L). 0 1- wuJ w z• • UN. z IV. A. IMPACTS ON SHORELI S POLICIES SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and /or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, December 1995 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT PRIORITIES: (page 53) Nos. 5 and 6 GOALS AND POLICIES: Goal 5.3 (page 57): Policy 5.3.8 (page 58)• Goal 5.6 (page 61): Policy 5.6,5 (page 62): Goal 5.7 (page 63): Policy 5.7.2 (page 63). B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and /or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) Tukwila Comprehensive Plan December 1995 GOALS AND POLICIES: Goal 13.1 (page 151): Policy 13.1.2 (pages 152 and 153); Policy 13.3.3 (page 153): Policy 13.3.5 (page 153): Policy 13.3.8 (page 153): Goal 13.5 (page 155): Policy 13.5.1 (page 155). V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer Tots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commercial /development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 7 ..r...mvi..r,.,. r.. rx.a+.w.nrsaaavons s*Ph*Y...�4' 'A: f? u+.7r; :'�,3 2'�z .�o ci;%,5,,, z z ce J U` o W. J am. N �. W O LQ. =0. _ Z� I— O Z I- U O co CI I- = 0, 22 0 wz =. O ~. z 1 3. Preference shoulk_ oe given to commercial /industrial d ...alopment that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. 4. Determine and consider the visual impact that the commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. 5. Encourage provisions for public access, especially visual and pedestrian, as an integral part of commercial /industrial waterfront development. 6. Design new commercial /industrial facilities and improve existing ones in such a way as to minimize wasteful use of the shoreline. a _ • 7. Encourage multiple use types of commercial /industrial development to provide public access re 2 and promote round- the -clock utilization of the shorelines. 8. Short -term economic gain or convenience in developments should be evaluated in v 0 relation to long -term and potential impairments to the desirable biological features of ' co w the river and its shoreline. �, B. PUBLIC ACCESS ELEMENT w O 1. Public access to and along the water's edge should be provided in new developments. a a. Water- dependent economic activities should be designed to allow substantial public N a access to the shoreline. b. For non -water dependent economic activities, where permitted, the entire water's edge 1- 0 should be available for public access, consistent with private property rights.z c. For multi - family residential developments, the water's edge should be kept free of n buildings and fences with public access made possible. o w d. For a new single - family dwelling unit, the water's edge should be kept free of buildings and fences. = 0 �— e. For other non - specified development, the water's edge should be available for public u. '6 access. Z lb co f. All public shorelands, except as noted in other policies, should be available for public - _; access to the water's edge. 0 2. Any modifications or extensions to existing development should be designed to allow public access. 3. A trail system should be developed along the river. a. Trails should be developed for linear access through public shoreline areas. b. Access points to and along the river should be linked by a system of trails. c. The connection of other trails in the region to the shoreline trail system should be encouraged and developed. d. To assist in developing a trail system, incentives should be offered to property owners for utilizing set -back areas. C. CIRCULATION ELEMENT 1. Roadways adjacent to the shoreline should be designed primarily for slow- moving traffic that would provide for recreational activities. 2. Parking facilities should be located upland with provisions for adding pedestrian access to the shoreline. 3. Public transportation should be designated to facilitate access to and along the shoreline. 4. Railroads should be encouraged to offer their rights -of -way for multiple use consistent with a shoreline location and with public safety. SSDP1v1T.DOC 5/12/98 sow man sasacsmasegm= 8 D. RECREATIONAL ELEMENT 1. Publicly owned recreational uses should be enhanced and, when feasible, enlarged. a. The public should have first option to buy shoreland as it becomes available for sale, based on an acquisition plan with clear public intent. b. The opportunity for sport fishing in the river should be enhanced. 2. Recreational uses should be incorporated with other shoreline activities. 3. Those unique or fragile areas of the shoreline which cannot be maintained in a natural condition under human uses should be designed and maintained as open space for passive forms of recreation. 4. Views of the shoreline and water from shoreline and upland areas should be preserved and enhanced. a. New shoreline development should not significantly obstruct views of the shoreline or the water. b. Enhancement of views shall not be construed to mean excessive removal of vegetation. E. SHORELINE USE ELEMENT 1. Shoreline activities identified as being appropriate shoreline uses should be planned for and encouraged. a. Short-term economic gain or convenience in developments should be evaluated in relationship to Tong -term and potential impairments to the desirable biological and aesthetic features of the river and its shoreline. b. Preference will be given to those activities which protect and enhance the desirable features of the river, depend on a shoreline location, and /or provide public access to the shoreline. c. Shorelines particularly suited for a specific and appropriate use or activity should be planned for and designated. d. Multiple use of shorelines should be planned for locations where integration of compatible uses is feasible. 2. Relocation of those activities identified as being inappropriate should be planned for and encouraged. 3. Aesthetic considerations should be encouraged when contemplating a new development, redevelopment of existing facilities or for general enhancement of shoreline areas. 4. Planning, zoning, capital improvements and other policy and regulatory standards should not tend to increase the density or intensity of activities on the shoreline. F. CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. 2. Develop regulations requiring the maintenance of a buffer of permanent vegetation between developed areas and associated water bodies to improve the aesthetic qualities of the river, retard surface run -off, maintain constant water temperature and reduce siltation. 3. Promote linear shoreline access, especially pedestrian and other non - motorized types, in the areas close to population centers; such areas would also serve as buffer between water and developed areas. SSDPNIT.DOC 5/12/98 ' : *101 _ : -Visa ` .14% 9 z z1; w mo: U 0 . CO CI w = J 1 N u w0 LL a" _0 Fw f-. I--0 wI U0 0 ww 1- m �z - ='. o~ z 4. Develop regulation., for site coverage, building height, set -backs and density to insure visual access to water, promote interesting development and prevent encroachment over water. 5. Provide facilities for intensive recreational activities where the sewage disposal and vector control can be accomplished to meet public health standards without adversely altering the natural features attractive for recreational uses. 6. Evaluate the effect of proposed recreational developments on environmental quality and natural resources of an area. 7. Develop standards for preservation and enhancement of scenic views and vistas. 8. Outfalls and surface run -offs should be controlled to minimize adverse effects on the river. 9. Open space should be distributed along the river. G. HISTORICAUCULTURAL ELEMENT 1. Protect and restore areas having historical, cultural educational or scientific values. 2. Access to such sites should be made available to the general public. 3. Visitors should be provided with clear identification and interpretation of historical /cultural sites. 4. Public and private cooperation should be encouraged in site preparation and protection. 5. Suspected significant sites should be retained. 6. Newly discovered sites should be kept free from other intrusions until their value is determined. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES A. ALL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT 1. The development minimizes impacts on wildlife & significant vegetation, sandbars, wetlands, watercourses, and other important habitat features are maintained through the proper location, construction, management of shoreline uses (5.9.1). 2. The development protects riverbank vegetation and, where feasible, restores degraded riverbanks (5.9.2). 3. The development mitigates unavoidable disturbances of significant vegetation or habitat through replacement of habitat & provision of interpretive features (5.9.3). 4. Streets, flood control, surface water drainage and sewer system projects, clearing /grading activities and landscaping are designed, located and managed in a manner that minimizes water pollution, provides erosion control, and protects water quality (5.10.1) 5. The proposed development does not appear to cause significant adverse impacts on flooding, erosion & natural resources in Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. within & outside of Tukwila's jurisdiction (12.1.6). 6. Capital improvement projects & private development are designed, located and managed in a manner which does not endanger public health, safety, welfare or capacity of river to provide Tong -term community benefits (5.11.1). 7. The development is designed and located to minimize impacts to habitat, vegetation, access, recreation, historical resources and flood control (5.3.2). 8. Where over -water structures or structural reinforcement of the riverbank is proposed, it is necessary for a significant Tong -term public benefit or water dependent use (5.3.3). SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 10 z a • w 00 0. W =. wO d = W Z �. HO Z I- o: o- 0 w ul w Z. r 1.. O 1-; z 9. The proposed devL.Jpment reflects the river's historical role and protects the Tong -term public use of the river as historical resource, by providing for the identification, protection & interpretation of unique historic /archaeological features (5.8.1). 10. The public development is designed to reflect the river's natural features & community traditions (5.8.2). 11. (EXCEPT FOR TUC and MIC) The development is designed and located to provide for multiple uses; provide water enjoyment uses as transitions between river & non -water dependent uses; & to encourage efficient use of land through clustering, shared parking, < mixed use, etc. (5.3.8). ~ w 12. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) The development reflects high - quality site planning, architecture and 6 = landscaping; and includes setbacks, buffers, height/bulk provisions for open space (5.5.1). o 13. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) Areas included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides ? N W a trail for public access along the river (5.6.6). w J � 14. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) Areas not included in Green River Trail Plan: The development CO u_ provides public access or a private natural area in lieu of physical public access (5.6.6). 15. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) The development maintains views of the water from the shoreline and 1 a from upland areas, through building height, bulk, modulation, windows, breezeways & outdoor N a spaces (5.6.8). w 16. Where public access is provided: ? a) Access is designed and located appropriately in relation to the particular site w O uj conditions and private property concerns (5.4.2). b) Access is designed to be safe and convenient, and includes amenities such o as benches, drinking fountains, and parking lighting (5.6.7), (5.6.10). D o H. c) Access is designed and located for diverse types and variable levels of = w' intensity to minimize impacts on natural environment & private property (5.6.3); where there are issues of safety, security, personal privacy or wildlife habitat , Z preservation, public access to the river is limited to appropriate levels (1.5.5). fu co 17. Where appropriate, the commercial development provides a connection between P concentrations of commercial activity and the trail network (1.11.4). Z B. PROJECTS WITHIN TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (TUC): (Meet this additional) The development is designed and located to encourage water enjoyment uses; to provide for multiple uses; to provide additional benefits such as riverbank restoration, fishing piers, boat launches, views, interpretation; and to encourage efficient use of land through clustering, shared parking, mixed use, etc. (5.3.7). C. PROJECTS WITHIN MANUFACTURING /INDUSTRIAL CENTER (MIC): (Meet these additional) 1. The development maintains or enhances existing visual quality; provides trees and landscaping as buffers; and provides amenities that enhance employees' enjoyment of river (5.5.2). 2. The non -water dependent development provides for multiple shoreline uses or provides mitigation for Toss of multiple use opportunities (5.3.9). 3. The development emphasizes restoration of riverbank vegetation (11.1.8). 4. Development on the east side of the river improves employee access (11.1.8). 5. MIC properties included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides a trail for public access along river. Where provision of a public trail would jeopardize site security or lot coverage needed for successful industrial operations, the development provides either a SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 11 public trail, privaL, natural area, public access elsewl .., a along the river, or other commensurate off -site mitigation (5.6.9). 6. MIC properties not included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides public access or a private natural area in lieu of public access, or otherwise mitigates the Toss of public access (5.6.11). 7. Development on the west side of the river improves public access, protecting owner's rights to reasonable use and enjoyment (11.1.8). 8. Development supports the Duwamish River becoming a natural feature amenity in the MIC (11.1.7). D. FLOOD CONTROL USES (Meet these additional) 1. Where feasible, the flood control project mitigates impacts on other shoreline uses, through restoration of trees & riverbank vegetation, public access, interpretive features, or other mitigation for loss of shoreline multiple uses (5.10.3). 2. The flood control project is designed and managed to minimize impacts on trees, riverbank vegetation, public access /recreation and fish habitat (5.10.2) 3. Where feasible, flood control structures are set back from the river, with land areas between the water and levee set aside as open space for recreation or habitat (5.10.2). E. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS (Meet these additional) 1. Where the transportation project is located within the shoreline zone or within corridors identified as river cross - connections, it provides safe /convenient/attractive pedestrian, bicycle & boater access facilities for public transportation (5.7.2). 2. The transportation project is designed and located to provide for multiple shoreline uses, such as trees, habitat, public parking, boat ramps, biofiltration swales, public art or interpretive signs (5.7.1). 3. The transportation project minimizes impacts on the natural environment, such as noise, odors and pollution (5.7.3). SSDPMT.DOC 5/12/98 .., ,.. c..!'.. r. t,.. ..s......,..!✓. {„r,u�s't•,sri!i �i ^TiY9)iij ;itC2�,i.a•"'im7 ili'>r.'C.Zi!`lnV.'s�:Y.'�y 12 r i.. 't. '�� ..r _ ��ii1�l" r4: f3P. j�. �4r vtm�;; i �54' �k. �'&.' �a' r' at�r, 5f�ati' ?: ��r_' i�F1sl w�, 31? tas+ Jwiat.' a' x�r, �txr' z i • • mow; .0 0 • N om. aw • W= J H. 0: g. u-< co, • a. zF. I- 0 Z F-! w w` F=- U • U N' •Z File: 98-.003 mm Drawing# City of Tukwila W Valley Hwy /Strander Blvd. Intersection Improvements 5/7/98 Vicinity Map 1 ;k e+ttdlx ii1,,E € dC Environmental Checklist WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY / STRANDER BLVD Tukwila, Washington Prepared for City of Tukwila RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER (206) 433 -0179 May 12, 1998 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply ". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project ", "applicant ", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal ", "proposer ", and "affected geographic area," respectively. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97) \jc 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: West Valley Highway / Strander Boulevard Intersection Improvements. 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila, Public Works Department 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Robin Tischmak 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 Date checklist prepared: May 12, 1998 Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Advertise late June, 1998 and construction during the summer of 1998. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: A Shoreline Permit application will be prepared and submitted. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Permit Required Shoreline Permit 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31197)1 jc Review Agency City of Tukwila 2 •�'c,h,.. .. ..kio. :?i9N,n %T 7'�.+t^3.511.iU: r3 rrttii al t A:�(i.Y�r. LJi'a�Y.4 � ''"" ,4V. �.e"a %� t�iCl�ie7�. �:7i: tw^ t�i�.k�.+ir j5�,'ui7i:�t..Ua°�`:. ` td: '. 2 iS ai'gi4 k4:4*-2`�7 ':rir,rr�,raFaa+^'.2E' 1 ~ w 6 m, J U: 00 0. w; w M. I. w 0' u. Q co Di = a w _{ z� I- 0. Z 1-; w w; 2 (:): i 0 z w 0 z 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Northbound West Valley Highway approaching Strander Blvd. currently has two (2) through lanes and one (1) left turn lane. This project proposes widening of the street on the east side of West Valley Highway south of Strander Blvd. to provide an additional left turn lane to westbound Strander Blvd. There would then be two (2) northbound through lanes and two (2) left turn lanes. The project also includes modifications to the traffic signal at the intersection and construction of sidewalk on the east side of West Valley Highway from approximate survey station 166 +60 to 172 +25. The proposed use is for vehicular and pedestrian traffic and would occur within street right - of -way or easement. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the NW 1/4 of section 25, Township 23N, and Range 4E, W.M. The project area is the intersection of West Valley Hwy. and Strander Blvd. and extends approximately 600 feet north and south. See figure 1. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No 96006 1 Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)1 je 3 • • Figure 1 City of Tukwila W Valley Hwy/S trander Mva Intersection Improvements 5/7/98 Vicinity Map 96006 %Reports Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc pgiONSIONNMEMBEEMMAM. 4 UN. 4. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth 1 a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slopes are approximately 2 %. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. c. d. Generally, the soils consist of a loose silt with fine sands over a silty fine sand over a soft elastic silt. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only .z .a =� F-w JU; UO w= .w 0; a; w, 2.. z r~ Do o =. • O H w tu` e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. • Uu) _. • F" There is expected to be some fill material imported for the sidewalk and street widening on the east side of West Valley Hwy. south of Strander Blvd. The fill will consist of gravel base material from an approved gravel pit that will be used to construct the subgrade for the roadway and sidewalk. The fill in this area would require about 1,000 cubic yards of gravel borrow. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Very minor erosion due to surface water runoff may occur during construction of the project. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing site is approximately 85% impervious and will be approximately 90% impervious after project construction. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31197)1 jc ... �rtL,' 3'+ r•i %i':::.Ai.i,...'.'':4Y:$'.�: «.x:`: ;�s.'i1.S':'N�Giirv3 w� 5 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. Air Silt fence will be installed where practical and filter fabric will be used to cover catch basin inlets to collect minor erosion during construction from surface water runoff. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary dust, odors, and emissions from construction equipment and paving operations would be generated during construction. Vehicle emissions should be expected to slightly decrease after construction due to more efficient operation of the intersection. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Watering and street cleaning will occur during construction to minimize dust emissions. . Water a. Surface: 1) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? if yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Near the south end of the project, the edge of the roadway is approximately 70 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the Green River. The Green River turns into the Duwamish River and empties into Elliott Bay on, Puget Sound. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131197) \ jc imotponspoloonselsommir 6 Evaluation for Agency Use Only — ..�.„,,.a...wweart�tWF3l�t =tl9�r z .10 UO: i. !A� w= W Oc J' u- V- cy zo. tu n o u) w w; u�± Z O z. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Yes. The project would construct approximately 250 s.y. of sidewalk along a the east side of West Valley Hwy. within the 200 foot buffer. Seee w' attached plans. re 2. u6 m' U 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be 0 o; placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate ` .� w' the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of w = i J 1- fill material. N u.' -w 0 None. g 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? = 0: . Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if F' _, known. z1 E- O z 1-: No. 2 n` U 0. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note O �. location on the site plan. zit--; W. = 0; No. ~ II O; z: 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to v N; surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated .P. I: volume of discharge. z._. No. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc 7 s4r'2• .ft .:YSi6'!ts b • Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? z If so, describe. 2. o O` 1 N 0. (O W ' W = 1)—: w 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, g 5` generally describe. a _ . Possibly. Soil from erosion and sedimentation during construction could ~ is enter surface waters. This would be minimized or precluded by the use of Z f- siltation control measures. w 17: d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff U O � :0 H. w w. H O, z' U (n: _, o'' a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: z.. The storm water runoff from the street is collected through catch basins into a piped collection system and discharged to the Green River through an existing outfall. This project includes new catch basins and pipes to collect runoff from areas where ponding is occuring in the street. water impacts, if any: Silt fence and filter fabric will be used to minimize sediments being carried away in surface water runoff during construction. . Plants deciduous tree; alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree; fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants; cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A narrow strip of grass wil be removed for street widening and sidewalk on the east side of West Valley Hwy. south of Strander Blvd. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131/97)1 jc e. ,.. ::f:. :P�•. ii: iif :'..._ .' =a4 "i ":�%�;tki ✓etSu.i= 8 .Mi4'ui 4. i`A .Nr , 8sAiV. ikaW V�iBFx tEci; ). 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The disturbed areas would be seeded with grasses upon completion. 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity is currently used to power street lights and the traffic signal and will be used for any additional street lights. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10131197)1 jc 9 z = Z, oO co �w W z'. N U w O. gQ D. a' f- z, Z �- Ot Z ui O N` C3 I- LL! W: H V L 0' w on U =; O z Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. . Environmental Health a Viz` u65 00 a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to : cn cv toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, J W that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 0 No. w 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. _ d None. ~ w z� 0, 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health w hazards, if any: ? None. b. Noise: 0 2 V', 1-- U. O' 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your z: u0 project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2 _; 0 Existing noise in the project area is due primarily to vehicular traffic. This z. project is a street improvement project which will not be affected by existing noise in the area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction activities would cause a temporary increase in noise levels between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Long -term noise levels will be the same as what currently exist. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: This project will comply with the requirements contained in Tukwila's Noise Ordinance. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10131197)11c 10 • 1-• •. x''41,1' tai akVI Kitt .P Q, 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is the intersection of two (2) arterial streets. Adjacent properties are used for commercial businesses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is street right -of -way. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Street Right -Of -Way. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. • i. j. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc 11 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. Housing f-, w r2; Jo 0 O co w' w= a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate cn . w .o' • ig b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate . 1 w • O None. w .Do c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: o (DILL oI--; Not applicable. w w. 10. Aesthetics • whether high, middle, or low income housing. Not applicable. whether high, middle, or low - income housing. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including ' antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Three (3) additional luminaires for visibility at night are proposed. 960061 Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)1jc 12 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. z c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your w proposal? None. Ex 2 Jo. UO cno w 111: d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if •J t-' 'w0 Street lights would be directed toward the roadway and would be designed g to minimize Tight directed toward adjacent properties. co �w F. Z 0 Lu Mo Oco`. of w W' wz — _ No. ;0 z any: 12. Recreation a. b. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Interurban Trail to the east, the Green River Trail to the west, and Bicentennial Park is located to the west. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97)11c 13 ::w..unrwi:8:.�•:ctio-iAis': . • •, .., .... . ,. -Y ^�.L`htisfredcL':+i&'�'kk ..�3•i�i�'kr. <ti:.G�rb:4c?.t'iz `,:iti!'viFS,nri<iti Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. • 14. Transportation z _ 1-,. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if re 2 '6D: any. -J o. CI ; The site is the intersection of two arterial streets: West Valley Hwy. and • w w: Strander Blvd. , ` -1-: 'w u- w 0' b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the 2 approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 15 Yes. There are two (2) bus zones within the project area. One is located = a• on Strander Blvd. west of West Valley Hwy. for westbound traffic and the ~ i° other is on West Valley Hwy. north of Strander Blvd. for northbound traffic. ? f-:. -O: z F- Wa c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How : , D. many would the project eliminate? o 0:. No parking spaces would be created or eliminated. ;W w _.0y d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements o • to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally Z describe (indicate whether public or private). 13 �' _: • z No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ot) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. None. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. The project is a transportation improvement project. 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97) \ jc 14 ary. nra.patgra mi... 1c. - .wer.s4tl¢nsmeittlgrr 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are proposed. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Storm Drainage b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Storm drainage will be modified to pick up areas of ponding in the street. 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97)1 jc 15 Evaluation for Agency Use Only z •7.w t. • JU; U O' w w' • W =; w; w o; gJ Q _> �o z I-: Auld • • • L w' 111 Z O F- C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 611-‘ 1.6aLL lV14 y 2.2 /616/.81 96006 \ Reports \ Sepa (10/31/97)% jc 16 RiLRsr-i.2kc�.lcc:Isuesnfts -oza .rit, iii:.k;vam;rfi s.e. v C."if.otri atit :. efra- ;,r,„„estztrr l): k:'r g.....ic tie i ziil3:irKtt.`74.0,4t4A(R,,F 7••`r2 P.ST :i;,17;:L+?i:Pari ,M: nN,% E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. z J U. UO I. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? co o' cn w w =.. The proposal objective is to provide adequate left turn storage from -' northbound West Valley Hwy. to westbound Strander Blvd. The w O existing left turn lane does not have adequate storage for the number of left turns and vehicles back up into the through lanes causing safety g i. problems and delays. i 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these Z = objectives? z o: Lengthening the single existing left turn lane to meet storage 2 o' requirements is the other alternative. o 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred w course of action: w0—`. Lengthening the existing single left turn lane would require widening of w Z. West Valley Hwy. further south than dual left turn lanes. This widening v - to the south would be severely impacted by the close vicinity of the z Green River causing much higher design and construction costs as well as severe impacts to the Green River itself. The preferred alternative (dual left turn lanes) provides more storage and left turn capacity during the green signal period. It also can be constructed without causing severe impacts to abutting properties or the Green River. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: NIA 960061 Reports 1 Sepa (10/31/97)11c 17 '1! ; 1 • I • File: 3 nun Drawing # • 1 .... .... . . . ••• • . ... .. . . ...... , . ....... . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . ... . .... . . . .. . . '• . .... .... • . • • ....... • • • . . . ..... . ... . . ... . • • . ... • ' • .. . . . . . . ... . . ..... . . . . .. ... ' . . '. • . .• . . . . . . • . . • . e'o!tP6, `^ : • : • . . • . .... . . .... .... ............ • • . ...... ' • ..... . ...... ' . . . . . . . ..... . . .... . : . : : : :Goi : LoW. : IMPACr. . . .. ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •• . . • ... ....... ......... ......... .... . . . . ......... ... . . . . . . . . . . . .... ....... • • ........ .... . . . . . ... • • ' • , • • ... .. • • • • . • • • . . .. . . • . .. •• • • • :• .. • .. . . . . ' . • . •.. . .. .. . • " ..... .. • •, .. ... • ■ . .. , ... . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ...... . ..... : ...... • • • . • ... •.; . • ... ... ' .. .. • . .. • . • .. • , • .. ..! . • • • . • ... . . . ' .... • . • ..... . . ..... • .1! • : ;• • • 14t411.:(LisAF4%Cr. .... . . . .. . . . ... ' • ' • . ...... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .... .. ... I •)) ,; •` . • •:.:••••', •i'. •: • t') • ,/ ••:::;• • ••■:: -; •y,.: • ' . • • ):" • " /- vc.' • .• • • . • • -.I' • )1 • ; INCH i J4 -1.•tr;••••••3: 1.1111 00.1.1 LEI 11111ri • \ ') • :), ill.1 fa 1.ut in 1 1111 . 50% SUBMITTAL 20 • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET PUE31.00 •'&170G3E130 DIE P -ENGINEERING-STREETS-WATER-SEWER-PARKS-BUILDING- IY 00104D 4-11-14 CRAW 4-10-98 MU DKR PlIOL LOCHNER . CITY OF TUIIL LEY A W. VAL HWY / STRANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ROADWAY WIDENING PLAN . STA. 17 2+10 TO 172+57.73 (....[Trrl.! • i • • I • N • • • C • ' H ' ' • ;••' '•'p •••p• . • • , . • • 1 • . 1 • • 1 1, uf • Tr. • ;0,.T:14J.1=!411T ••• ITf• 14;.•?•• 1 1 h. CHINA I 5 ,!-Ti • • - • •'• ••,••-•, iiijliiiil . ..• • .41. '• --1101104 • o. LA•1 /9" DIA. METAL LID UNKNOWN PURPOSE ,T1110„._719_47.41:9 TRANSFORMER T.23 N. R.4 E.W.M. POWER STATION -- ELECTRICAL VAULT 0 4 .1 LAN -111EPIIMMI1111161/1111 0 4. G WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY (SR 181 CO to ••• 166+00 cn taw t-t) LANDSCAPING .-• _ MHZIIII ° 6 FUEL BLOW C.:1• VALvE 0 165+25 (35• LT.) C8 TYPE 1, GRATE B.. 26•01 ........ ...... ••1••••' 15 165+00 166+50 (35' LT.) 03 TYPE 1, GRATE EL. 24•86 50 33• LT. TYPE 1, GRATE EL. 25.07 m.14.11,11■A. se4 \ 49 STIc- Dkl NG GROUND 20 0 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER 20 40 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 5 0 5 10 60 15 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET 170+49 (24' Lt) 03 TYPE 2 (EXISTING) GRATE EL 30.28 I : 4..., ! • : t • : •-•-•••;.44.4-:.=.-- = • 1 i ..... i t •--.-- . .1.....12' — : 3 i i t . -4-4 .....■ ■■• : 1 ....... . " : • : . • .. i ..... • : I : --t- : . . i = : : enn,............ . 1-: i : • . i ! • . I :"..r. . • -..t • ! : : : i ....:.•• . • T..:- -... ! 1 .........., — - : I : . • 1 . 4.4.........4... • , , I 1 ...... 4 -.-. • : i... . I : r---:: I • •....... it ..... . .... - • .:......I... T **T- • • • • ... ..... ....MO .... : I ..T...r : 1 • .1. , i 7. . , T i . . : ••■7;n■:•• 1 AlMliammimmrammm •••••• OT 1 ! ! 1* j I_ • -1-- = M... ....... -- . ••■•••• .. . ... ' 1 ..;...,....... • ' • • 3 • . . • • . ••■••• . ■ .4_ • : ••• .4. .1... h i• -"" ••••• . . tic • -r : ! • •!---:. . 1 • i... .....4...:.... : - . • 1. ' I • ....... I 4 7 • ...T... ; 4 .— .... :..,...:.. • ! '. .. • • .._,.. . • • ! ...: ••..; .. f..•—• ' • : f .4 . . - -4 I : . . T.--.. • 4- . _ • • • -L.— ' • ... ---i-:- -- - • : I = ,... 1 ... .. .. ..... it ...... i .- •, I 5 ... ... -H. ..I el 11 II .1 .... , , • el -- i • , • ---- • i :1 • .. 1 I .. .. • 1-1 .......1-...- •1 I .. ...-.. _Li 1 i • 1 1 .3 .... • III! iTi r, fiTIIT I . : 1 -!*** • : • IE:itlir**** 1 , • i ; - . , 4 . ! • ; . 0.".6-.0Z.. • ....4.--.. ■•• 7 . , i: -1... . ; . • '''''''—'r t r• - ... ...1.....................÷........1... . i . : I • i . ' 4. • : 4 i ' : • ' i • ! : i ..---1-1•••••-• ---rrri.- I : 1 t •7-; ..-.1.....i. .•'... 1 —1 4-* 1 kb.. 27 : I • : . .11: • : L 1 1 1- i••• ' • = . r•I r : -I • 3 • , : e . - --3- e , .....- ..-....---- • I • 1 • -4- 1. I : • = -I • , 1 -1 .,...—. •,.--r*.• : 4 't) ...... . . ••• `11 4 ...1 .... 4/ : . : T • 166+00 167+00 1 00 cos STATION MILE • sus: Hoiez 1.40' verr• 1•.5• PUJE30=1:10 W01;31330 DIE -r -ENGINEERING-STREETS-WATER-SEWER-PARKS-BUILDING- At 4-27-N DG 4.27•114 Of 4-27-14 •1 LOCHNER • 169+00 ATTACHMENT 1:1 50% SUBMITTAL 170+00 171+00 • • OTY OF TUntLA W. VALLEY HWY / STRANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ' ROADWAY WIDENING PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 165+50 TO 170+10 • L 0 glitgA 1 , !T;'7» 6 , • it El• .: ti. ; • 1 -160 ; 11111111111111111111111111i111111111.111ikl)iliiiiiiiiii.1.11111111thill1)11111111.1110111111.1:11illiiht!,11.11.410111111.1101111.111.111111111111111i1 • ‘! T.23 N. R.4 E. W.v > m .l ►ADINAY �WIII€hT(�G4 SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY DRAINAGE EASEMENT (STATE TO MAINTAIN) STA. 168 +70 1 STA. 170 +08.09 END DECEL. TAPER (9.5' LT.) BEGIN ROADWAY WIDENING SR 181 167 +50 BEGIN DECEL. TAPER (8.38' RT.) EXISTING SIDEWALK END ROADWAY WIDENING r9.: " "`�"�" � Vii. �.•� + � _ � Ci01 r� END PROJECT SR 181 172+57.73 MP 10.72 0 i1 1-1 ii 'r -1 1 ^• 11 1 a\�+` t''3 151 13 13% q ` 4)h 1 t ;1 1 1 t It + tt ■ 1 tIt dct a t t 1 1 It 1 a 1 1 I t 1 1 1 t It N 1 1 1 jt 1 11 .-- - i 1 %t, Ii t t,1 \ u` ' 1 t It a t 1 t t' a _ 1 t t, N _ N t 1 1 t1 t1, • M� - %� ___- '� 1` • t N tt tt1 1 ill R/W STA. 165 +21 STOP BAR STA. 46 +38 STOP BAR 1 1 1 1.J tJ SR 181 167 +00 BEGIN LEFT TURN TAPER (10': RT.) 17T IT IT I wvirwIT SR 181 170 +08.09 END LEFT TURN TAPER, RT. EXISTING SIDEWALK 173 +00 CURVE DATA CURVE NO. P.I. STATION DELTA • RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH SUPER C100 168 +67.69 9'55'00° 1000.00 , 86.76' 173.08' 0.06 /, LT.. C101 171+34.25 20'26100” 700.00' 126.16 ' 249.64 ' 0.06 /, RT. ��II'IIi:I�ii:ll(11M1:1:I. I: 1' 5 CHINA ✓ \ .Jtj. is W.St yrt t,\ tit..} „ t' i "{, .' 91 vl El aL .-0t��as ti_@ .� t c p b>,: •£ Z' 1'' 0 .. � s..t..w,,,. �.,. • ...�� 3 �:Jl^:ai rug {:,.,.G.�xrr� "T �'� IIIIiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiliiIIlIII} iIiiiIIIiilI IIIiIIIIIliliiiilii! IiIiiI <<I�.IiiilI!iIll11IIilll..i �,i�.L�I[IJIIII! ill [!I.��I��liiii�lllil�l�ilii�il ATTACHMENT C File: 35mm D awing# 1 II 1,11 a 11 I1 T.23 N. R.4 E. W.V. >> CO 1 fROA gW(1I' SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY DRAINAGE EASEMENT (STATE TO MAINTAIN) END PROJECT SR 181 172+57.73 MP 10.72 EXISTING SIDEWALK 0 0 rn STA. 168 +70 STA. 170+08.09 END ROADWAY WIDENING II 1I• I1 1 11 1 11 173 +00 I 0 II 0 ' 1 o EXISTING I• co 13'l _ ____ 1 SIDEWALK 15 \ ` 1 1_ r - -_ 4 SR 181 167 +50 BEGIN DECEL. TAPER (8.36' RT.) 1_ 1 CO 0 0 R/W STA. 1.65 +21 STOP BAR STA. 46 +38 STOP BAR I 11 ,1 1 1 1 %1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11, % 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 _ - - -I 1 1 ' 11 1) SR 181 167 +00 • BEGIN LEFT TURN TAPER (10' RT.) �1 SR 181 170 +08.09 END LEFT TURN TAPER, RT. CURVE DATA . CURVE NO. P.I. STATION DELTA • ; RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH `SUPER C100 168 +67.69 9'55100" ' 1000.00' 86.76' 173.08' 0.06 /, LT. C101 171 +34.25 20'26'00" 700.00' 126.16' 249.64' 0.06 '/, RT. Z File: m Drawing#. QL� [w'i�,�i xy 51. bi '' •ei �� Zl 't.:�/yt �Y.s �.- �a�"'^' "^i,�" fl,}, hG '�rzsts � a .,j t 1, '. �` .: • Iiililiiiiliiih 111, iiili ill] 1iii:l tiih i I iuil�ii�11il`1 I�ii�li i :I��i�Ii .L1..01i' iili:�i�i�i��. i `��� ih � �i�i�l;��iii�� �it(ii14i10(I N- (N J c' (1) Ft757-27-69 7 gal.-4 •0E;2 Atat/va' 006 -.94/44v7 X.c/ te7//N.Y0-1. 175•/SZ 7FA.ZP-avy 6962/ 7 490- V0- 2 /Y • 4=77VP. ;6'0%9 v..4,9, p9Z/ .c 9_1 '1.z7 OPOP aar2 /Yel/•wa" 3gg saihe.e/7 161/0 . . • oS5 m 6t• -go'? -c0,0; "••••'''0.1 • \i • Ot• *Ss ra 9-Q- •s• • OfrO, •.c77.c .'1226//Yag' " ZE Z kV?" 5_1/4447 V77 .792-0-z 4 0. A7 z 49' *9grt- Irk -12 -io# tSe • 04,715. •ft• • 14% • 1.• fe '5t) ; z 4: -5 re- 1 ' - 4% eferroSOZpv .14 /-/p 4 . .. •rro, Wu. 'S '. .. bt % 1*____if,;•so, %: atm sT %.1 / '' / / ‘1 AA , / ' P,‘ • i • . ' ., / % .- 7. .7- ' larriTtiiiilypplipliplitypillii 11-111111111-riliiiiiIITI,1111Foririiiiiiiiiiii,11111 1 I 5 INCH • , 1 • ' ' Z.72..57,...•7,r:,."-..4-,!-,,,,It:...;;A:1,.,,,,...-7-.--<,,-.;1*-• .,,,,....„,i 5 CHINA ' '• ; , 6 ''-e'•7•-•?,..7.1:•:-,:.•.''.-•;.,.-!-... `'.•:.- -'•,„,' :' ' ' • ••:. j •'-'''. •- • St ta. CI • al V4i--.4:li.;.;-;'4.1.Li,,,-,4 -2.044,',. 17. e a I: IiiiillitilmillIIIIIIIIIHIIIImimilnid.,:limil,",1-1,...1„..1....1,...f.;..1,::,1::..ts...E...1.....1...., .i .., 1.. i.. 1 j. ONO • File: • • • , • • . • I I _SEATTLE - �� • MIC/H KING COUNTY SEATTLE NORTH Thls Is a graphic representation of land use designations adopted by City Councti 12/4/95. Larger maps that show property lines, designations, and other zoning information are available at Tukwila Department of Community Development IT King County Shodlne Zone North 42nd Ave. S. Bridge Tukwila Shoriine Zone South 42nd Ave. S. Bddge SEATAC Zoning Designations LDR -Low Density Residential MDR - Medium Density Residential HDR -High Density Residential 0 -Office MUO -Mixed Use Office RCC- Residential Commercial Center NCC- Neighborhood Commercial Center RC- Regional Commercial RCM - Regional Commercial Mixed Use TUC Tukwila Urban Center C /LI- Commercial Light Industrial TVS- Tukwila Valley South LI -Light Industrial HI -Heavy Industrial MIC /L- Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial MIC/H - Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial Overlays and Sub Areas Public Recreation Overlay Shoreline Overlay (Approx. 200' each side of river) - Tukwila City Limits I iIII1{rl iTITI11 llil'I'I'I'!igI1 II1111iif r1,11lllI�I�II�1l.1Itl'ITLi.I' 6 .4 ..., . 5 eINCH' 1 ° . ". °- SEtr CHINA, ZL OLaT�6 ..e„�r�� =i 9p i 5 v: : s: Z ;. d1ili11i1111111li1iil11ulii111111iii1i llillliiiiliiiiiiii iluiilili11ii llii.ii(ili iliili i iliiiIN611i1ll01111illl11u111111ll,r1l PROSEC LoC rt oN '1• T.23 -N/ R. SLOPE, DRAINAGE MD OPOSED SLOPE UTIYIT DEW ■ UTRITf- OFFiVNA�,E' .,EASEMENT Cu AND-DRAINAGE-RAM/EN 0 (S ATE TO MAINTAI /j� �LL IT T .—_........__________*.es—_:::: •--).--_ ......---..-• --...------ W.M. END PROJECT SR 481 172 +57.7 MP 10.72 zir 011115\ _ -- � — • � °'`�_�'`- a rorr YA� '-- .�_.�•..• 0 2 0 50% SUBMITTAL 20 0 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER 20 40 SCALE IN FEET — ENGINEERING— STREETS — WATER — SEWER— PARKS— BUILDING- BY DATE DESUCHED 4-11-96 D6A9N m 4-11-98 CHECKED COL 4-11-96 MD PAUL DR 7nD Dt NO LOCHNER CITY OF TUKWILA • W. VALLEY HWY / STRANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS • ROADWAY WIDENING PLAN STA. 172 +10 TO 172 +57.73 Na DAR Rfl, 1111TJTr {III111Ii1111IIMIIIi:III1 ifT.1 7 I1II1II{ IIII!, IvLu LI '(I:117I'1 '1'1111111,111 I 0INCH .i u CHINA 1 � a`. M. 5 6 St bl El Zl ' "' O�Dt;' 6 8 L-t 9nr,( 5 ti £ Z 1. O 11111111111111111111111i111111I1111Iii1111111I1111Iuii1. 1111111111111. 1111111111. 11IIIii1111110 11.111d1I!tllui_1.1i.LIIII 1I1ILill111III11 I11111It Iti111 T.23 N. R.4 E.W.M. POWER STATION Z DIA. METAL LID UNKNOWN PURPOSE -- ELECTRICAL VAULT 0 0 0 .TRANSFORMER LANDSCAPING c". 0 --- • LANO 30 25 20 15 165+25 (35' LT.) C8 TYPE 1, GRATE EL. 26.01 ASS 0 — FUEL I3LOW OFF VALVE 166+50 (35 LT.) C8 TYPE 1, GRATE • B. 24.86 M. N,14% 1 TYPE 1 3-V LT \ NP, GRATE EL , 25.07 STING GROUND 20 0 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER .20 40 60 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 5 0 5 10 15 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET 170+49 (24 LT•) C8 TYPE (EXSTING) GRATE EL 30.28 165+00 166+00 167+00 PU13I1,0© 1OE1330 DIE IT 0 —ENGINEERIN G—STREETS—WATER—SEWER—P ARKS— BUILDING— DT DATE 1:85411D DT 4-27-91 MAU DIG 4-27-98 CHECKED IT 4-27-U 14102. Olat POOL 091. nao s No STATION 168+00 • PROFILE SCALE: HOR1Z. 1■20' WRT. LOCNINER 169+00 170+00 171+00 50% SUBMITTAL an' OF 7UKWILA W. VALLEY HWY / S1RANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS . ROADWAY WIDENING PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 165+50 TO 170+10 . ITIVITITTITM1 F 1 - 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 ) I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tilri wil 1 II i 11 1 ififil y1111111111 •! 0 INCH • 1 i r.' ..;,i7777 '"•:..7-;:7:.:?,3•::;:.3i;;,,.7.:: V#4.-,0; .!i., 5 6 CHINA . , . . 2 1?.3•,,?. . • : ... :1 . 6 .-:- , - .i,: -- - .. 7- :, -.,. 9 1 t, 1 E I. Et • ' :.s. . ••,...01:•••••:-„,,,,6:.. : 9.,:.,,,.::,c,„,i,:,.•,9. :4 • 9 • 1' C i I: : /1130 , , 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111161111111111111[1ffi11ithlili1J11611611)111,11.10111,111111.111111,110.1,6111111111111111111 i DATE •-■ : : • . . 1- i : i i ' • i : , • i • : : ..., • 1 .i. : ._.__ 1 : • --t ■ .....;_ • ' • : • • • • . 1 1 : •—.... : : : . 7-. : L.: ' • • ' arrl....÷... 1 i ' I + :. I 4,- ...t........ : 1 • : : AuwAvi.A... r i i--1 --7-÷—:-..4-..--' = *\1g-2? • I .i 1 .--i I : t : : • 0.- • i-- . t: -I = : • : ' AL...A...tr. ! 1 . . • 1 i. : • • : . .8- • i I : i - I , 1 . • :-r- . . . t : i- ' ' • = . • : I I • • : .-. I •• : • • : .. —!.. • . • . I . : . , • : •,- 1 ; • : • • t ii :. 1 . ' i • , : i : • 1 : , f 4.. . ' t i : • : I. t . : • 1 :-.1- : t : i••• i. . 1 • t . . . ' ....;• , . • • • • 4 : . • : • NUIIIIIIIIIIIWP • . 2i.: 044 0 01 V d • : • i : .; • • I :. I 'ad -L-4: ; — : i ..L .. • y_......- ."1.- • ; • 3 • • : -..-• c . 1 • , : ..ii...;:. , . : :-. I i • : • i ; : • II : • I. --!.:. : -t . .. . ...... i : . : • i__,I. . -,--... .; : : • . .f. .1 , i 1 - . .... - 1 ..1.....4-i -1.. • t -1... ii • .11 11- ...I.1 -, 1 I I • ...-, 1 ' : I ••=iI •••1.--1 • -.. ' 1 1 •i 1 il T .1. 1-- 7 . 1... ::;111411E 1111111.1nowill 1°6-107-- : : 3 t ! + • : ' 0 60x.• : —I : I •• 1 . --r . 4 1 . : . • -1 • : : : t • • "IE" ili2, I i : • i • • : -!-. : • 2. i : • : • : i : ! .., 11 ; i : ri- i-•• , : 1 ' 2r2t2: = ...... I : 1. I- 4 . .1 I 1-- . : : , - : ! i 2 • :: i. ! • I i ..t... I i -1 + -I • • ..L.. . i . i • I ... : I : . ••1.- i•- • * r • , . ... 1...i - • i • , : ' • ...3 • 2 , : . t. . il .... : r -I .1 ..... . 1 • t• 1 : : . .1 1 • ..1 . -I -.1 : : 1 5; • 165+00 166+00 167+00 PU13I1,0© 1OE1330 DIE IT 0 —ENGINEERIN G—STREETS—WATER—SEWER—P ARKS— BUILDING— DT DATE 1:85411D DT 4-27-91 MAU DIG 4-27-98 CHECKED IT 4-27-U 14102. Olat POOL 091. nao s No STATION 168+00 • PROFILE SCALE: HOR1Z. 1■20' WRT. LOCNINER 169+00 170+00 171+00 50% SUBMITTAL an' OF 7UKWILA W. VALLEY HWY / S1RANDER BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS . ROADWAY WIDENING PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 165+50 TO 170+10 . ITIVITITTITM1 F 1 - 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 ) I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tilri wil 1 II i 11 1 ififil y1111111111 •! 0 INCH • 1 i r.' ..;,i7777 '"•:..7-;:7:.:?,3•::;:.3i;;,,.7.:: V#4.-,0; .!i., 5 6 CHINA . , . . 2 1?.3•,,?. . • : ... :1 . 6 .-:- , - .i,: -- - .. 7- :, -.,. 9 1 t, 1 E I. Et • ' :.s. . ••,...01:•••••:-„,,,,6:.. : 9.,:.,,,.::,c,„,i,:,.•,9. :4 • 9 • 1' C i I: : /1130 , , 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111161111111111111[1ffi11ithlili1J11611611)111,11.10111,111111.111111,110.1,6111111111111111111 i DATE •-■ goiscpWA\( . ............................ .................. ::: (Doi : (.Ali t.: CmPAcr :::: : 116 NEW: g':SIAEWALk.: . 2. 1 • • .. . ..... ..... Niew FI.LL:.. . ... EL. 2.x.2: :.:(loo :1R0 . 1 :S'CI N:y' ;o.UN A : • • _ :114.0 :(f&HwNX . .. ' :: :KW.ERESA1.K :"roe : : : : : 0 • • RECEIVED' ' ' ' c (••OP•TUKWJL A AV :a 2:1998: : PERMIT CENTER. • • • • iiiili11:11111011i 1 :111 i.l lii iliiii . ip.1.if101:iiil(ii.itif il111[1►liii.ilii� i�ii�Ali al.0.1111.1j a(ti►ii(116. 11),l11ii.li iil 1