HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L98-0039 - BERGSTROM - SUBDIVISION TREE REMOVALL98 -0039
BERGSTROM
SUDIVISION TREE
REMOVAL
14921 57thAve. So.
Z'`
ce
6
U O,
U) W
W 3:
J I-
u.
WO
u.
Via'.
=w
O:
Z F-:
LL! Ljj
a to
O-
a I--,
W W:
H V'
- O`
w I
O1
CITY OF TUKWILA
Permit Centel
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
(206) 431 -3670
Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review.
Applications will not be accepted through the mail or facsimile.
Project Nameffenant: 15e0� , /„Qin Wei soi t SI W �
Value of Construction: S/ �p
Site Address: / 1latZ1 `"/5„71 5ev f/ City State /Zip:
'I �1 7v iGi
Tax Parcel Number:
11 S 7z0 - -05
Property Owner: Q
1 %ge t "" %5/'Oni
..p/q0
Phone:
Zo6-2 ea, -e99y
Street Address: City State /Zip:
gel /9(/1/ 4#i4, ill 98/09 -tokly
Fax #:
Zo& - 25 1 432.94/
Contact Person:
/m1 D9v1 — DAP/6 Cemoihd, lLe
'Phone:
2 3 - 87k/-e.k 9y
7Re
Street Address: City State /Zip:
goo l ai41, IA/8` s7- 419-. / /*Eo , 9g5.5-17,
Fax #:
Zi3 -f37 '-5 -2.ti'/
Contractor: /I3 yrE t?ierni al 1174 -4eaha Awe/40,74o/
Phone: 25.3 - b3- 770 8
Street Address: City State /Zip:
56IX q*`/ 'j01/-i7e_' Ctnl-- 98390
Fax #:
2S" 3 - 863 - 77 V'4
r
Architect:
-.8/v * �'3 ..8y9-zuZ�
Pho e:
Street Address: City State /Zip:
Fax #: •
253 - 776 43517
/CDPI VA/ r AVE ex', piiiialui, q3,/
Engineer:
71,0114- ezc2re s
Phone:
25.--- 25-/ -6 665"
Street Address: City State /Zip:
6(o5z wd L /9 /$7-P4"t - /02 Kekir 9sfa3z
Fax #:
yZS - ZS/-o 5'
MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUESTED: (TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT)
Description of work to be done: %ec• &mem i / A... d L�4/s /
Will there be storage of flammable /combustible hazardous material in the building? ❑ yes ❑ no
Attach list of materials and storage location on so.arate 8 1/2 X 11 .a.er indicatin• •uantities & Material Safet Data Sheets
■ Above Ground Tanks ■ Antennas /Satellite Dishes ■ Bulkhead/Docks ■ Commercial Reroof
❑ Demolition ❑ Fence ❑ Mechanical ❑ Manufactured Housing- Replacement only
❑ Parking Lots ❑ Retaining Walls ❑ Temporary Pedestrian Protection /Exit Systems
❑ Temporary Facilities ❑ Tree Cutting
APPLICANTREQUEST FOR MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS
❑ Channelization/Striping
❑ Flood Control Zone
❑ Landscape Irrigation
❑ Storm Drainage
❑ Water Meter /Exempt #
❑ Water Meter /Permanent #
❑ Water Meter Temp #
Miscellaneous 4.foloviii,
❑ Curb cut/Access /Sidewalk ❑ Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) #: Size(s):
❑ Land Altering: 0 Cut cubic yards 0 Fill cubic yards 0 sq. ft.grading /clearing
❑ Sanitary Side Sewer #: ❑ Sewer Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public
❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public
Size(s): 0 Deduct 0 Water Only
Size(s):
Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Schedule:
❑ Moving Oversized Load/Hauling
MONTHLY SERVICE BILLINGS TO:
Name:
Phone:
Address:
City! tat ./ ip:
0 bower
9 -Metfe 0 Standby
WATER METER DEPOSIT /REFUND BILLING:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
City /State /Zip:
Value of Construction -.In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be
reviewed and Is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules.
Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall
expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days
upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application
shall be extended more than once.
Date apr atlo ' y CQpt d' g
MISCPMT.DOC 7/11/96
Date na7n llr7 19 g
}
Applica !on ry: (Initials)
•
ALL MISCELLANEOUS PE • • APPLICATIONS MUST B SUBMI D,WITH THE FOLLOWING:
•ALL DRAWINGS'SHAt.L BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN
> BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED
> ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED ARCHITECT
> STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON
LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
• CIVIL/SITE PLAN DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER
(P.E.)
in
;;.SUBMIT APPLICATION:.. AND REQUIRED CHECKLISTS FOR
PERMIT REVIEW
- Submit checklist ,No: M -9
Above Ground Tanks/Water Tanks - Supported directly upon grade
exceeding 5,000 gallons and a ratio of height to diameter or width
which exceeds 2:1 .:
Phone:
Antennas /Satellite Dishes.
Submit checklist No: M -1
in
Awnings /Canopies - No signage
Commercial Tenant Improvement
Permit
Bulkhead/Dock
Submit checklist . No: M -10. :
El
Commercial Reroof.:
'Submit checklist No: M -6
in.
Demolition:
Submit checklist No: M -3, . M -3a
in
Fences - Over 6 feet.in Height
Submit checklist No: M -9
in
Land Altering/Grading /Preloads
Submit checklist : No : M -2
in
Loading Docks
;Commercial Tenant Improvement
Permit. Submit checklist No: H -17
in
'Mechanical (Residential & Commercial).
Submit checklist No.. ; M -8;.; .!
Residential
R H -6, H-16
El
Miscellaneous Public Works,Permits _: t
Submit checklist : No: H-9
®
Manufactured Housing (RED INSIGNIA ONLY)
Submit checklist No: M-5
in
Moving Oversized Load/Hauling
Submit checklist . No: M -5
CI
Parking Lots :.
Submit checklist No: M -4
in
Residential Reroof - Exempt with following exception: If roof structure
to be repaired;or replaced
Residential Building Permit
Submit checklist :: No:. M -6
in
Retaining Walls - Over 4 feet in height
Submit checklist No: M -1
in
Tem ora Facilities
p ry t ..
Submit checklist No: M -7
in
Temporary 'Pedestrian'Protection /Exit Systems
Submit checklist No: M 4 •
Tree'Cutting
Submit checklist No: M 2
Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If
not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the
permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit
in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". -
Bulld /ng "Owner /Authorized Agent, elf the.applicant is other than the owner, registered architect/engineer,.or. contractor licensed:'
by the State of Washington,.: a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit: application and
obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER
PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS
PERMIT.
BUILDING OWNER O ENT:
770-
Signature: �� /��
Date: �./pa o
Print name:
Phone:
Fa II:
Address:
City /State /Zip:
MiSCPMT.DOC 7/11/96
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner
FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist
DATE: August 26, 1998
RE: Bergstrom Plat #L98 -0039 - Tree Permit Review.
I have reviewed the recent Landscape Plan submittal date - stamped 8/10/98. All of the requested
revisions have been made and the plan is approved for the Tree Permit requirements. If you have
questions please contact me.
cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director
Kelcie Peterson, Permit Coordinator
Mike Davis, Davis Consulting Group
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Sutte #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner
FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist
DATE: August 10, 1998
RE: Bergstrom Plat #L98 -0039 - Tree Permit Review.
I met with the applicant last week regarding the izndscape plan including tree permit regulations.
We agreed the current landscape plan submittal (L1, Date - stamped 7/15/98) needs some revisions. I
have the following comments and recommendations.
1) All regulated trees existing on "sensitive area slopes" have been mapped on the plan.
However, there is a question about the tree removal and tree replacement numbers being
identified. For the purpose of the tree permit, only trees removed from sensitive area slopes
(20% or more gradient) need to be identified and replaced.
Please specifically denote those trees being removed that are subject to replacement. Other
trees being removed can be shown but are not part of the tree regulations. I suggest using
different symbols or notes on the plan.
Specific tree permit revisions that were observed for removal/replacement on the current plan
are as follows:
Lot #19 - Please add the 12" Fir.
Lot #20 - Please add the 6" Decid., 10" Decid., and 20" Maple for a total of 5 trees.
Lot #5 - Please add the 8" Fruit, 18" Maple, and 4" Fruit.
With the above revisions, the total trees to be removed for the Tree Permit will be 14 trees.
Subsequently, the revised replacement total will be 34 trees. The total number of new trees will be
55. Please revise and correct the summary in the tree replacement table.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
•
.+
Bergstrom Plat Tree Memo
August 10, 1998
Page 2
With a total of 55 new trees, the proposed surplus planting would be 34 trees (55 - 21) and
this will satisfy the tree regulations . However, I have only counted 51 new trees for
combined street and trail installations. More trees may be added to the trail or possibly along
the frontage of 57th Avenue S.
In summary, Tree Regulation permit materials are not final in the July 15, 1998 plan submittal.
However, the plan appears complete except for the required revisions. It appears that several trees
will need to be added to the plan. Please have the applicant contact me if there are questions
concerning this memo.
cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director
Kelcie Peterson, Permit Coordinator
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
Building Division - Permit Center
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670
DATE: 0/0/98 PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: L/r� ' 6632
PROJECT NAME: ?e726.6 ROM $1)137)1090)/0
PROJECT ADDRESS: /.1.9./ 57 4t
CONTACT PERSON: 4,1. / F A2f//$ PHONE: 3.3' 97S-66 > 9
REVISION SUMMARY:
•Rveien,ks p e z ( , 6 W i t l e n t f eJ
SHEET NUMBER(S)
"Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions.
SUBMITTED TO:
3/19/96
AUG- 6 -98 THU 4:12 PM
Davis Consulting Group, LLC
900 Meridian Ave East #19 -313 Milton, WA 98354
(253) 874 -0694
Fax (253) 874 -5241
Thursday, August 06, 1998
Moira Bradshaw
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd #100
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE; Bergstrom Plat
Dear Moira,
I am in receipt of your memo dated August 4, 1998. Please note that item #3 "the
barricade" is shown to be removed, and three bollards are shown to be installed on the
civil plans.
I met with Gary on Wednesday August 5th, we reviewed your item #5 regarding the trees
to be removed. The result was that three trees on lot #5 will be shown as removed, and
only one tree (due to the proximity of the road grading) on lot #8 will be shown as
removed. In addition, the tree calculation table will be revised and clarified. Other than the
foregoing Gary did not have any further comments.
Per your memo you have not seen the land altering and demo permit applications (there
are no other applications). They were submitted to Public Works on June 4, 1998. If you
need to, please review the other permits immediately. Furthermore, if you have any
additional comments, PLEASE fax them to me no later than 5;OOPM Friday, August 7th.
The landscape architect will be working on the final changes to the plan over the weekend,
ready for resubmittal on Monday or Tuesday of next week.
Thank -you for your attention to this matter. If you should have any questions please call
me at the number liste • above.
Sincere
Is
Davis Consulting Group, LLC
.? {,�, � "•^
P. 2
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Memorandum
DATE: August 4, 1998
TO: Mike Davis
FROM: Moira Bradshaw
RE: Bergstrom Subdivision
cc: Gary Schulz; Joanna Spencer
z
~ • w
O 0
CO 0
W =
Jf.
W o
2
• a
= W
Z�
F- 0
Z F-
W
• w
U
�
The following are my comments regarding your application. I have not seen the land o D-
F—'
altering and other miscellaneous applications, which will need to be reviewed for w W
consistency with what will be approved here. �
u_ o.
1. What are the grades 4 feet on either side of pathway? If grades adjacent to the z co
walkway exceed 30 inches in the 4 foot shoulder than railings of 4.5 feet should be v
installed? 0 '—
z
2. We need a detail cross section for the path construction. Currently it shows no cross
slope (2% is usually recommended for drainage)
3. The barricade is shown on the plans and is required to be removed and replaced with
bollards per City specifications. There needs to be a bollard detail on the plans. The
sidewalk in the westernmost tract should be aligned with the sidewalk in S. 150 Pl.
Please show how this will be accomplished.
4. Attached is a step detail that should be included on plans.
5. I do not understand the choice of trees to be removed, there appear to be some that
could be saved. This could relate to the utility plan, which I have not seen.
6. There will be other comments from Gary Schulz.
'
Where constraints don't allow a planting strip
or wider sidewalks, the sidewalk can be
wrapped around the upper end of the
driveway cut. (Note: this method may be
difficult for sight- impaired who follow the
curb line for guidance, but this can be helped
by providing a substantial lip at the edge of
the driveway along the road edge.)
This approach dips the sidewalk in the
direction of travel, keeping the cross slope at
a constant grade. The problems with this
approach are that pedestrians must
maneuver up and down the sidewalk grade
change and drainage may accumulate in the
sidewalk area. A prominent lip at the edge of
the driveway can help to resolve the drainage
problem.
Surfacing
The surface of a walkway must be firm and
stable enough to support the higher point
loads of wheelchair wheels, crutch tips and
other mobility aids. Pavement is typically the
most practical means of meeting this
requirement. Smooth pavement surfaces are
the most desirable, such as portland cement
concrete or asphaltic concrete. Unit pavers
can also provide a stable surface as long as
the joints between paving units are smooth
and level. Sometimes, scoring patterns and
unit paving patterns can create irregular
surfaces that compromise wheelchair stability
and control, or that create barriers for
ambulatory pedestrians who have gait
impairments. Architectural style and
appearance should always be balanced with
the importance of accessibility. Surface
materials should be chosen to avoid creating
slippery conditions for pedestrians. Exposed
aggregate concrete surfaces accumulate
moisture which can freeze and create icy
Accessibility •
conditions on sidewalks if not maintained
properly.
Compacted crushed rock surfaces and
consolidated soils are less desirable and may
not be acceptable for accessible routes of
travel without extensive maintenance to
ensure rollability and maneuverability.
However, in some cases this type of surfacing
may be a suitable solution in outdoor
recreation areas to make walkways and trails
more accessible to all (see Toolkit Section 4 —
Pathways, which addresses accessibility
considerations for recreational trails).
Compact crushed rock surfaces into a smooth
condition without loose rocks, bumps or
grooves. Loose gravel, such as pea gravel and
most types of wood chip surfacing are
generally not acceptable as accessible
surfaces.
Textural and Visual
Cues
People with sight impairments need cues as
they travel through a pedestrian system. If
their meaning is understood, textural changes
in the surface of the walkway when changes
occur in the route of travel can serve as a
tactile cue for persons who have low vision or
are blind. Textured surfaces at street
crossings, building entrances, bottoms and
tops of stairways and ramps, and across curb
ramps are examples. Figure 20 illustrates
textural cues.
Other elements can be strategically placed
along accessible routes to identify ramps,
building entrances, pathway intersections,
etc. Such elements include lighting, change
in landscaping, signs, and changes in
pavement patterns or colors. The Access
Board is currently studying the effectiveness
of various tactile cues.
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES GUIDEBOOK 45
Accessibility
Textural Cues
Hazardous area
Raised stripe
Recessed Qoove-v
I II
hssir;
Direction of travel
{
Da
wn�.\
Source: Adapted from Time Sauer Standards for
Landscape Architecture
Site Connections
At least one accessible route of travel is
required by the ADA on sites to connect
primary building entrances with accessible
site facilities such as parking areas, bus drop -
off zones, and public services such as
telephones and drinking fountains.
Accessible routes of travel need to be designed
in accordance with the requirements for
walkways described above, including the
maximum cross slope and grade
requirements.
The route between accessible parking spaces
and the building entrance must be carefully
planned to minimize the distance that must
be travelled by a disabled person and to
ensure that obstacles and hazards are
avoided. It is recommended that the
maximum distance be no greater than 30
meters (100 feet).
Signing and Other
Communication Aids
Signing is an essential aid to negotiation for
all pedestrians, including older adults and
people with disabilities. Signing identifies
nearby services, warns of possible hazards,
and directs people to their destinations.
Signs should be readily observable, with clear
and precise information. Place directional
signage at decision points where access
provisions are not obvious to indicate the
location of accessible parking spaces, building
entrances, and restrooms. Redundancy is
desirable for significant safety and directional
information.
For the sight - impaired, Braille strips can be
added to the edges of signs that are reachable
and located for that purpose. Raised or
routed letters may be desirable since not all
sight - impaired people are able to read Braille.
Audible systems in the pedestrian
environment are being experimented with
across the country and in other nations.
Audible messages, chirping devices, click, and
tones can be strategically located to warn
sight- impaired pedestrians of condition along
a route, particularly at street crossings, or to
notify them of important information (at
kiosks and bus depots). One example
includes chirping devices being placed with
traffic signals at crosswalks to notify
pedestrians when the crossing phase has been
activated. Push buttons at signal locations
need to be installed at heights easy to reach
by people in wheelchairs.
46 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES GUIDEBOOK
.:_..:,,
Site Design for Pedestrians
Stairway Width
The minimum width of public stairways
should be 1.5 meters (5 feet), and the
minimum width for private stairways should
be 1.1 meters (4.5 feet).
Step Dimensions
Treads and risers should be uniform in height
and depth, with treads no less than 0.3
meters (11 inches) wide and risers no deeper
than 0.2 meters (7.5 inches). It is generally
preferred that risers for outdoor stairways be
a minimum of 11.2 centimeters (4.5 inches)
and a maximum of 17.5 centimeters (7 inches)
in depth.
Tread to Riser Ratio
The tread to riser ratio should be consistent.
A typical formula for tread to riser ratio is:
2R + T = 65.0 to 67.5 cm (26 to 27 inches)
where R = riser and T = tread
Height between Landings
Typical height between landings can vary.
The Uniform Building Code allows up to a
maximum height of 3.8 meters (12 feet).
Lesser heights are generally recommended to
provide more frequent resting opportunities
for pedestrians and to breakup the visual
expanse of the stairway.
Landing Dimensions
Landings should be long enough to allow a
minimum of three strides on the landing
before proceeding onto the next set of steps.
A 1.5 -meter (5 -foot) landing is a typical
minimum length. Longer landings are
typically in lengths of multiples of 1.5 meters
(5 feet). The width of the landing should be at
least the width of the stairway. Landing
placement for stairways is illustrated in
Figure 110.
Tread Design
Nosings, the outer exposed corners of steps or
stairs, should not be abrupt. Designs that
create a potential tripping hazard should be
avoided. Nosings should be easy to see and
not obscured by confusing surface patterns.
Nosing edges should be chamfered or have
rounded corners. Beveled shadow lines help
to create a visual distinction between steps.
The heights of the bevels should be kept to a
minimum to avoid tripping, with nosing
undersides not exceeding 1.3 centimeters (0.5
inches). Closed, beveled risers are preferred
over 90- degree square risers, risers with
recesses, or open steps. Figure 111 illustrates
recommended nosing configurations. Treads
should be pitched downgrade at a 2 percent
slope for proper drainage.
Sites Used
Exclusively by
Pedestrians
Pedestrian malls, plazas, and special districts
including tourist and recreation sites, are
often developed for either exclusive use by
pedestrians or with the focus that pedestrians
are the primary user group. These spaces
provide important opportunities to increase
pedestrian travel in our communities and the
enjoyment of Washington's unique features.
Since these sites serve high numbers of
pedestrians, they are usually designed with
the specific needs of pedestrians in mind.
Figure 112 (on page 197) illustrates an
example of a pedestrian plaza design.
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES GUIDEBOOK 195
Site Design for Pedestrians
Landing Placement for Stairways
A mainsail of two Landings should be long The height btwean lendngs
sips should be enough to allow an easy taiga be kept to a maahwm
provided cadence with • minimum of height of tem 167 to
three atrldes on the landing allow • view of IM nest
ti— landing
Three steps ere
preferred to
1WIs1Oe clear
hedbaity of the
pride charge
A teen (61 length lending
IS e typical minimum
Looper landings are typ cay
multiples of teem 169, 1.,
tam, ant 4.6m, eta
Heights preatfo than tam
167 me psychologically
less inviting
Where this Is not poss8le,
a manhunt of ono landing lot
ovary twenty treads is
recommended to nanhmlls
fatigue
r - - -- f —� 2 a
tom
16' mkt/
Source: Time -Sauer Standards for Landscape Architecture
Note that the 'multiple of
five' rule for stairway lendkgs
slows en alternation between
left and right foot when stamina
onto and than oft of a landing
Figure 110
Stair/Step Nosing Design
Edges should be
chamfered �,
1
Shadow tress
should be kept
to • minimum
Recommended
Source: Time -Sauer Standards for Landscape Architecture
Reoe catch —\_3, 01 s
toes of shoes,
braces, eta
Open risers oatoh
toes of shoes,
braces.
eta
F-1
Not Recommended
Figure 111
196 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Ga uID EBOOK
Trails and Pathways
Grades, Cross
Slopes, and Drainage
Trails and pathways can be designed and
constructed with various grades, depending on
the level of accessibility being served, as
discussed previously in this toolkit section.
Longitudinal grades on pathways should be
kept to a minimum, especially on long
inclines. Grades greater than 5 percent are
typically undesirable. Where steep terrain
exists, grades of 5 to 10 percent can be
tolerated for short segments less than 500
feet. The design speed should also be
increased and additional pathway width of 0.9
meters (3 feet) should be provided for
maneuverability on grades exceeding 5
percent.
Its important to keep pathways free of puddles
and water accumulations that could become
slippery in cold temperatures. Drainage
systems must be designed in accordance with
all applicable standards and regulations.
Check with your local agency to determine
drainage design requirements.
A 1:50 (2 percent) cross slope will facilitate
adequate drainage on pathways. Sloping in
one direction instead of crowning the pathway
is preferred and usually simplifies the
drainage and surface construction. Ditches or
swales should be provided where necessary to
control runoff and provide water quality.
Ditches function best on the uphill side of the
pathway to intercept drainage.
Drainage grates and inlets are best located at
the outside edge of the pathway or off the path
entirely. Grid style grates are recommended
over grates with parallel bars spaced at 1.3
centimeters (0.5 inches) maximum. Grates
should be set flush, less than 1.3 centimeters
(0.5 inches) below the surface of the
surrounding pavement, with no raised edges.
Drainage systems should be maintained in
good working order year - round, particularly in
areas of heavy rainfall.
Shoulders, Side
Slopes, and Railings
Recommended widths for shoulders at the
sides of trails and pathways are provided in
Table 36. In areas where there are side slopes
or ditches, a minimum of 1.2 meters (4 feet) of
clear, level area (including shoulder) is needed
before the up slope or down slope (or ditch)
begins. Ditches function best on the uphill
side of the pathway to intercept drainage.
Maximum side slopes of 3:1 are recommended.
When the grade drops severely from the
shoulder of a pedestrian or bike travel way,
railings are required by most jurisdictions.
When a vertical drop is more than 0.8 meters
(30 inches), exceeds a down slope grade of 2:1,
and is located less than 1.2 meters (4 feet)
from the edge of the trail, pathway, walkway,
or sidewalk, railing needs to be installed along
the extent of the grade drop. Figure 38
illustrates conditions where railing is
required.
Railings are required by AASHTO and
WSDOT to be a minimum of 1.4 meters (4.5
feet) in height adjacent to multi -use trails and
pathways shared with bicycles. On paths,
walkways, and sidewalks used exclusively by
pedestrians, the railing can be a minimum of
1.1 meters (3.5 feet) high. Railings are
required to be designed with vertical posts,
bars, and top and bottom rails spaced so that a
10.2 - centimeter (4 -inch) sphere cannot be
passed through the bars (Uniform Building
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES GUIDEBOOK 77
Z
= 1—
Z
w
6 �
- U
O 0
to o
Ill
- H
Cu_
w 0
Q
2d
F. W
Z=
I-
1- 0
Z 1-
W
O • (
O I—
WW
1=— H
u-O
Z
U
O =
~
Z
Trails and Pathways
Pathways Requiring Railings
Railing
.gm
min
I
Trail / Pathway
Less Than
1.2m 14'I
Trail / Pathway -
Railing
L
Less Than
1.2m (4') s
*. Or On Slopes Greater Than 3.1 Where
The Drop la 1.8m (6') Or More
Figure 38
Code, Section 509.3; requirements of local
jurisdiction may vary).
A maximum 3:1 slope is also recommended for
steep side slopes on the uphill side of
pathways. Its best to avoid high retaining
walls immediately adjacent to pathways since
they may be out of scale with creating a
pedestrian friendly environment. High walls
should be terraced back from the edge of the
pathway shoulder. Blank walls should be
screened with landscaping or designed with an
attractive face or artwork.
Connections and
Crossings
Initial planning of trail and pathway routes
should minimize crossing points with roads
and driveways as much as possible. Pathways
should connect to street systems and
destination sites in a safe and convenient
manner. Connections should be clearly
identified with destination and directional
signing. Crossings should be well - designed
(see Toolkit 7 — Crossings).
Managing Motor
Vehicle Access
As a general rule, separated pathways
function best when motor vehicle access is
prohibited or limited to maintenance vehicles
for periodic inspection, sweeping, and repairs,
utility vehicles, and emergency vehicles. The
following design treatments are suggested for
managing motor vehicle access on pathways:
• Pavement cross - sections with sufficient base
and thickness are necessary to support
maintenance vehicles while minimizing
deterioration. A 10- centimeter (4 -inch)
asphalt thickness over a 15- centimeter (6-
inch) aggregate base is recommended.
• Pathway edges need to be designed with
added thickness to support vehicle loads.
See Figure 39 for thickened -edge pavement
design.
• Access points can be provided from
roadways for use by maintenance and
emergency vehicles, but blocked from use by
other motor vehicles with removable
bollards or special gates (see Bollard Design
and Placement).
78 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IG UID EBOOK
'
,,
Trails and Pathways
Figure 39
• Gates or fencing at side entrances to the
pathway, can be specially designed to allow
passage for pedestrians, wheelchairs, and
bicyclists without providing an access point
for motor vehicles.
• Signing can be installed to notify pathway
users that maintenance vehicles may be
entering the system at the identified
locations; temporary signs and markers
need to be carried and placed at appropriate
locations as warning devices during
maintenance activities.
Bollard Design and Placement
When bollards are placed at pathway
entrances, marking them with bright colored
reflective paint or emblems increases their
visibility to pedestrians and bicyclists. The
Bollards provide access control at points where
pathways join or cross roads.
d
Bollard Spacing
Bollard
•
1.5m (5')
Between Bollards
i
Short Curb Radius
Additional Bollards
for Paths 3m
110') Wide
and Greater
1.5m (5')
Between Bollards
Figure 40
recommended minimum height for bollards is
0.8 meters (30 inches).
Bollards need to be adequately spaced to allow
easy passage by bicyclists, bicycle trailers, and
wheelchair users with one bollard in the
center of the pathway dividing the two -way
traffic flow. If more than the center bollard is
needed, other bollards should be placed
outside the paved area at pathway edges.
Figure 40 illustrates suggested bollard
placement for various pathway widths.
Entrance Design to Restrict Motor
Vehicles
Motor vehicles can be restricted from entering
pathways through the use of special design
techniques, such as short curb radii or a split
path configuration (see Figure 41). These
techniques are most appropriate at locations
where maintenance and emergency vehicles
do not require access to the pathway.
Vegetation and
Landscaping
Landscaping and trees placed along pathways
need to be carefully selected to avoid the need
for excessive pruning, cleanup of fallen fruit
and debris, and watering, unless a fully
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES GUIDEBOOK 79
24"
J
eile
UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE OR
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
TYP. 1"C HAMFER 045' -4 SIDES
REFLECTORS OR REFLECT TAPE
1" GALV. EYE BOLT WITH SHOULDER
DRILL 7/16' HOLE FOR PADLOCK.
8" x 8" TIMBER (USE TIMBER -FORM MODEL 2561
AVAILABLE FROM VANCO ASSOCIATES 771 -1412 OR
1 -800- 826 -2684
6" -I
NOTES:
1- 18"-1
PERMANENT BOLLARD
}
+- 1"
CONC. FOOTING
TYP. 1"CHAMFER 045 -4 SIDES
42"
1/2" GALV. MACHINE BOLTS WITH WASHERS.
PEEN BOLT ENDS AFTER TIGHTENING. SET
FLUSH WTTH WOOD SURFACE BOTH SIDES.
18"
15"
1' GALV. STEEL ROD -DRILL 7/16' HOLE
FOR PADLOCK (TYP. BOTH SIDES).
PADLOCKS BY OWNER
12"
30' UNDISTURBED
SUBGRADE OR
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
8"
FINISH GRADE
CONC. FOOTING - TOP EDGE MUST BE
CLEAN EVEN JT. BETWEEN A.C. & CONC.-
BROOM FINISH TOP OF CONC.
1- 18 "---
REMOVABLE BOLLARD
3" I.D. GALV. STEEL PIPE - 2'6" LONG
4" I.D. GALV. STEEL PIPE - 2'10" LONG
WASHED ROCK
r ,l \
P
1. TIMBER SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR, DENSE CONSTRUCTION GRADE. AND SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED
2. STEEL TUBE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A53 OR ASTM A53 GRADE A.
3. NUTS, BOLTS, & WASHERS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTU A307.
4. ALL STEEL PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED.
5. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS C.
6. REMOVABLE BOLLARDS ARE REQUIRED FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS ROADWAYS SUCH AS MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS.
City of Tukwila
BOLLARD DETAIL
Not to male.
DATE:i 1/15/96
RS -4
ran MswawcV M-4/04
Memorandum
DATE: July 22, 1998
TO: Don Williams
FROM: Moira Bradshaw
RE: Bergstrom Subdivision
cc: Joanna Spencer
Attached is the landscape plan for the Bergstrom Plat, which conforms with preliminary
plat approval given by the council. At this stage we are looking at the details for the trail
and plant and hardscape materials.
Please give me your comments as soon as possible.
Several questions comments that I have are:
1. Should we have them reduce the grade of the pathway to 5% with additional steps?
2. What are the grades 4 feet on either side of pathway? If grades adjacent to the
walkway exceed 30 inches in the 4 foot shoulder than railings of 4.5 feet should be
installed?
3. We need a detail cross section for the path construction. Currently it shows no cross
slope (2% is usually recommended for drainage)
4. The barricade is shown on the plans and is required to be removed and replaced with
bollards per City specifications. There needs to be a bollard detail on the plans.
5. I've attached a step detail that should be included on plans.
6. I requested that the applicant recommend an alternate material or cement treatment on
pathways that abut driveways. The aggregate and regular brushed finished cement are
alike and somewhat indistinguishable.
7. The sidewalk in the westernmost tract should be aligned with the sidewalk in S. 150
Pl.
8. I do not understand the choice of trees to be removed, there appear to be some that
could be saved.
9. Should the street trees and groundcover be installed after house construction?
z
Hw
JU
U 0
W =.'
F-
U) w
w0
ga
D.
w
Z=
F- 0
Z F-
LU ILI
co
UO
O —
Li W'
F-
L 0.
▪ z
U =;
0 ~•
z
File:
5 -003
35mm Drawing#
GENERAL PLAN NOTES:
ALL '.CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN 'ACCORDANCE WITH THE•CITY.OF TUKWILA
REQUIREMENTS, THESE DOCUMENTS ARE SUPPLEMENTED BY. THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS, FOR RGAD;'BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION (WSDOT, APVA);
.AND THE KING CQUNTY.SURFACE VATER DESIGN MANUAL (KCSVDM). •
IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER AND•THE DEVELOPER'S
ENGINEER TO CORRECT ANY ERROR OMISSION, OR VARIATION FROM THE. ABOVE
REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN 'THESE 'PLANS. .
•
2. THE DESIGN ELEMENTS WITHIN THESE PLANS HAVE'BEEN REVIEWED
ACCORDING TO.REOUIREMENTS OF APPROVAL.
SDME.ELEMENTS MAY HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED OR MISSED BY•THE
REVIEWER. ANY VARIANCE FROM ADOPTED STANDARDS IS.NOT
ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED, PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
APPROVAL OF THIS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT
•CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION (E.G. DOMESTIC,
VATER CONVEYANCE, SEVER CONVEYANCE, PERMANENT STORMVATER CONTROL,
GAS, ELECTRICAL, ETC.).
4. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY CAN BEGIN, A PRE -
CONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD BETVEEN THE CITY OF TUKWILA
INSPECTOR, THE APPLICANT'S CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE, AND THE CONTRACTOR.
5. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER
CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS.
6: CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 7 AM TO 6 PM M -F. ADDITIONAL•
CONSTRUCTION HOURS MUST BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA.
7. FRANCHISED UTILITIES OR OTHER INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN
ON THESE APPROVED PLANS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNLESS '
PLANS THAT MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED
BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
8. GROUNDWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WITHIN A RIGHT -OF -WAY
DR APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BUT NOT UNDERNEATH THE
ROADWAY SECTION. ALL GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS MUST BE
CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION B1 3.02 OF THE APWA
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
9. ALL UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND 'COMPACTED TO 95Z
MODIFIED DENSITY IN THE UPPER 4 FEET VITH 90% BELOW THAT
PER ASTM D -1557.
10. ALL ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95Z
MODIFIED DENSITY IN THE UPPER 2 FEET EXCEPT UTILITY TRENCHES AND
907. BELOW THAT PER ASTM D -1557. •
11: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE •
SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, FLAGGERS, AND
ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY
OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION VITH THE
PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
12. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC AND PHYSICAL FEATURES SHOWN ON THESE
PLANS ARE'BASED ON A COMBINATION DF RECORD DRAWINGS, FIELD
RECONNAISSANCE AND FIELD SURVEYS. THIS IS THE BEST AVAILABLE
INFORMATION, BUT ACTUAL CONDITIONS MAY BE DIFFERENT. THE
CONTRACTOR MAY ENCOUNTER VARIATIONS BETVEEN ACTUAL
CONDITIONS AND THOSE SHOWN. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE CORRECT LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTIVE LIMITS SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR
DISTURBANCE.'
ROSIO■%SEDIMENTAT'ION' CONTROL
NOTES:':"
APPROVAL :OF .THIS EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. (ESC) PLAN-DOES
NOT.CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERNANENT ROAD OR,'DRAINAGE
DESIGN.(e,g.'SIZE AND'LOCATION OF. ROADS, PIPES, RESTRIETORS,
CHANNELS,•RETENTIDN FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.),
THE. IMPLEMENTATION•OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION,
' MAINTEIIANCE,-REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES
• IS THE'RESPONSIDILITY OF THE'CONTRAETOR UNTIL ALL 'CONSTRUCTION
IS APPROVED. .
•.D•RAINA6E:'1•10tE S :'''
L ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL.BE :LAID ON A PROPERLY' :. "'`,,'
.'. PREPARED. FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE VITH WSDQT 7- 02.3(1)., THIS
•.. '
.SHALL INCLUDE- LEVELING;AND•COMPACTING THE TRENCH;BOLTOM, :THE
; TOP Of =THE. FOUNDATION MATERIAL,' AND; ANY REQUIRED PIPE_BEDDING,:
, TO A UNIFORM,GRADE SO.THAT'THEENTIRE PIPE IS.SUPPORTED,BY •
A UNIFORMLY. DENSE` UNYIELDING BASE. •
3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS•PLAN SHALL BE.
CLEARLY FLAGGED .IN THE FIELD BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE •
FLAGGED.CLEAFING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING SHALL
BE MAINTAINE5 BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION'OF','
CONSTRUCTION.'
4.•' THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS. PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN
. CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES, AND IN SUCH
. A MANNER AS TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER
THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM .
REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED, SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE ,
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED (e.g.
ADDITIONAL SUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, ETC.) AS
. _ NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY
OF TUKWILA.
THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR
AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE'THEIR CONTINUED
FUNCTIONING.
ALL SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL ADHERE TO.KCSVDM. .
THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND
MAINTAINED A MINIMUM DF ONCE A WEEK OR WITHIN THE 24. HOURS
FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT.
WHERE SEEDING FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS. ADEQUATE, A
• TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX SHALL, BE APPLIED AT 120
POUNDS PER ACRE.
WHERE STRAV MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED,
IT SHALL BE APPLIED PER CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS.
CONTINUING WORK BEYOND OCTOBER 1 REQUIRES APPROVAL 'BY THE
CITY OF TUKWILA. . •, :
W WORK IS APPROVED THROUGH OCTOBER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED •
TO HAVE ALL NECESSARY EROSION AND.SEDIMENT CONTROL MATERIALS AVAILABLE
FOR USE;DN -SITE. •
• 2 CORRUGATED HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP)
SMOOTH,INTERIOR YALE PIPE MEETING AASHTO M294.
3: ALL OUTFALLS SHALL•HAVE BEVELED .END SECTIONS TO MATCH THE,SIDE
SLOPE.. :
SHALL`.BE
4..ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE VITH APVA 1996 STANDARDS,
AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA.
'S. GROUT ALL SEAMS AND OPENINGS IN CATCHBASINS AND MANHOLES.
:ROCK %RIP =RAP 'SPECIFICATIONS:
•
RIP -RAP SHALL BE HARD,'.SOUND, DURABLE BROKEN ROCK, FREE FROM SEAMS,
CRACKS,' FLAKES, OR OTHER DEFECTS TENDING TO CAUSE SEPARATION OR
TO DECREASE'RESISTANCE TO NATURAL ELEMENTS. THE SIZE SHALL BE
• (UNLESS. OTHERWISE NOTED),
1/2•-•.2'. 10.- 20Z
2' - 4' • . 20.- 400
' 4•. -8' 40- 70%
THE ROCK SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT SPACES BETVEEN LARGER ROCKS ARE
FILLED BY SMALLER ROCKS, ALL SECURELY TAMPED IN PL CE. WHERE
WATER VELOCITIES•ARE HIGH, LARGER ROCKS MUST BE USED, VITH BACKING
OF GRADED ROCK, TO GUARD AGAINST UNDERCUTTING.
CONSTRUCTION 'SEQUENCE
1. ATTEND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
2, FLAG CLEARING LIMITS, GRADING LIMITS.
3,. GEO- FABRIC SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION.
4• LOG TREES WITHIN CLEARING LIMITS.
5. CONSTRUCT CULVERTS AND EMBANKMENTS. .
6; HYDROSEED /MULCH AND STABILIZE EMBANKMENTS
CUT /FILL SLOPES AND ALL EXPOSED AREAS.
7. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL. REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION AREAS ARE STABILIZED.
Na GriatiRiw/D4lE BY
2.
"man, COMMIS
DP?' ITT COMMIS
RW
,AW
•
GROUND COVER
DECIDUOUS TREE
2,5'
•• GRAVEL
5• BRUSHED CONCRETE
WALKWAY .
10' BRUSHED 1 COLORED
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
25'
GRAVEL
3.5' LANDSCAPE
EASEMENT
g `•
•
•
20' TOTAL TRACT WIDTH
TRACT 0
13. THE DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS AND FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE
PRELIMINARY, IN NATURE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON '
THE FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN.•
DECIDUOUS TREE
■
PEDESTRIAN' PATH TO HAVE 2% CROSS SLOPE
• OF NEEDED FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE) . %•' ` ■
„ . 1110111111111111111d
%✓ .
TBROON EXTURAL. FINISH UE FAT
• 'TOP "AND•BOTTOM OF
• STAIRS (3' LENGTH
EACH WAY).
6'. BRUSHED CONCRETE
DECIDUOUS TREE.
10•IRUSNED 1 COLORED .
WALKWAY
15•.TDTAL TRACT WIDTH
CONCRETE •DRIVEWAY
24' TOTAL TRACT 'WIDTH
TRACT'',
ACT A,B, &C CROSS-SECTIONS
XI. A16:;ozf
asoMtDr;oTAK;: ;r.
i`i•tc r.•,,r ;
RECEIVED
rTY,0F.TUKW6.A'.
SEPIA :11998
,•'.:PERMIT CENTER','.
, i'. v Nf \ 1," 1 • is '.1 : •'CL:
r , 7). '3 r,: ??r,•. ":v'• ";r „'n r. ,,`,li'•T.N':tt r`• ;i::,; +.r,:a'a'.'. ::r.,.;,,• ';i£ _t+,7I ?•r'.
:4_•. . ".,_,,» r
111f'I'j'1'PI'(' 111'1' 11111' 111'1' 111117 111111 11'11111'1'I'I'I11'1'I'111' 1'I'I'I'I'I'1'1'T Ill
0
CHINA
91 Y( Cl Ll .')C,t ?j-01 6; :..'.Q _:. _L,_,- ".9_,yrf P C Z .l'R 0
IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIDhUI nDlull upllildullllpl nulnnnullulnlllllul .
, . J
1. :t •
t r`'
16 UAPLE
•DE00 IrUAPLE
17
000 FENCE - -"--
'
' ruAPLE
IRET,
HALL
BLDG,
BLOC I• 1 ,BLDG'. I .
6- 12•YAPLE CLUSTEII
, 6•SPU( E
7 BER THU I
3 PIN MUG'
r"-§7A A HEX
'BLDG
CT;:A
;TRACT B
\\ II LL_
BOLL DSO'
PATHWAY '• 18" ' IT 0
earl talk , Imo; All
•. �.. •:. J..A I f' ...! y • 1 ' �.�i �:' ,I'�/` ���J���fGL mom
it 1
!� .s111II► ....: .!o�aI►�11i�I,I�iI�_ I®11i%�,fi Pi'?
l`� 11 v �,
ti10°F to "FR
�16'YA >lE
ROSEED WITHIN
'URGED AREAS
UVA
P•) ,-GRADIN •
EMITS
.IO•nq
TRACT
i1�lRk >P'�i�0.0!►.r♦fC/I ®.'i►-xi( ,'e
. ��: ►mss••, °w,un n., >.- ,w -.'T, ,, ., a.• <N •
'�74Na7tsLmWsr•sES) • - i `{ 1/
• �' _ NW^ •
IO•FRU'T • IDYR
9.
8 "FI R
30 "FIR
2 IPV OIY cO1me413
10"FIR
8 "PINE
MAILBOX AREA
',r ,.6,yyr+yprry asyun._ -. .1 vey +H1 Wt. • •a_'
•
r NFRi7eAt�l_ATOTSDlf REM
" Reel�t •teaPrraen��.nriarxrwnaxnrnr• .
•
`GRAC
LIMIT
R/C
L5N915
6 DEGJ •
6'CE J •
22.06
. CONC.
R/C
LS #9158
4 "FRUIT
'FRUIT
BLDG
CONC. LS#
TRACT C
E DETAIL RIGHT
6'mmT
'NAPE(
10
6•FRUT•
TREE REMOVED DUE
GRADING LIMITS
BLDG
0' 10' 20' 40'
6'FRU11
C •BOLLARDS
P ARC LNA
BLDG . I
WOOD F7IC.
S. 150TH PL.
PNISM GRADE
NTYLINN AT OW Q I• =LOW
ADJACENT PAVING •IMAGES
TRIMI6ULAR MACNG L4YCVT
PLANTNOA
41
Avow. virAlwrAek A AT.
I I i t i I f -1 11 -11 I I 1 -1 T I`=
-I f 1 =U =1 11= I I -I 11 =1 I I
IxuTNG WIGRAAI
* . MACNG A• 61001 Q4' PLANS
70 CALILATl PLANT* PER SWAMI FOOT
M MACNG (1)" .
'MALE, . MILTIPLt' 1P.. to scum. TOTAL
. 'ANNA sr. • 'Larne pie SP.
-EDGE OP PLANT SEM OEM ' 10• .
WALK RNLI OR WALL
PLANT SPACING
NOT TO SOALe
V TOPSOIL TO ea Pq! CP ALL ROCK DIP I AND Ori4R FOREIGN MATTER„
OVER 1' N DIAMETER AiC ACID•.
•
2) RIP AND TILL SUSGRADE TO r" DEEP (wh) PRIOR TO NSTALLNG TOPSOIL
AND AttltCP*NT• AM TILL INTIMATE OP NIEGRADE AND TOPSOIL.
!) TILL TOP6GIL AND SOIL AMENDMENTS TO A MN. G" DEPTH .
2 PIN MUG
6 AZA HEX
Plant •List and Legend '
6YM. .41./ COMMON NAMES SIZE CONDITION SPACING
TREES. '
ACE PLA dCER PLATANOIDEb 2A' CAL. DID A6 SHOWN
NORWAY MAPLE (30' O/C a)
SHRUBS, .
AZA HEX AZALEA 'HERE' 2 GAL. . CONTAINER. 2' 0/C
. . KAIt r1E AZALEA
DER TWU '• • DERDERI6 TMUN. 'ROSY GLOW' 2 GAL. CONTAINER 4' O/C
.. ' Ro6Y GLOW BARBERRY
PIN MUG PIN1J� MUGO VAR ? t MO 2. GAL. CONTAINER 4' O/C
. DWARF 11 4O PINE
RMQ.Ij OC RHODENDRON 'ROCKET' 6 GAL. CONTAINER 5' O/C
MED. MT, R14000/PINK FLOWERS •
GROLIJDCOVERI' •
4RC UV4. ARGTOGTAI I4YL06 UVA -01661 4• POT , CONTAINER 18' O/C
KIMIIKIN ICK
GAU 6H4 GAULTHL•R4 6.IALLON 1 GAL. CONTAINER 3' O/G
• 6ALAL n .
LAUNI . . . . .
HYDRO eED PROTIME GEED SUPPLIER: . .APPLY PER SUPPLIER'S
MIX •11m 'PBX PLUG' HOee5 4 MOPKIN6 LTD. SPECIFICATIONS
PORTLAND, OREGON
. I•e0m- 346.)203 . APPLICATION R4TEI
OR APPROVED E 9UAL , 2LD /1�06F. .
•
•
PNISM GRAD[ .
I•TASLIW4 AT r NLOW
ADJACENT PAVING NSPACI•
I QR TO MEMO . •
NS
GRADING I* TYMCAL rote w.'AT OR UNARY FLAT PLANING ND. _ .
'Mk DIPTM FOR TOPSOL. SOW. N'R3DflHT$'AID PILL N WLL • •
N
memos* AT TI* CUTNDI EDGES lD CENTER OP PLANTNG'lNDl.• "' ,
PLANT BED• ••GRADING' .. ;._
• .Nlx To SGALI'`.
hiLINEFI
D TOP•OLTOyFIm OP All IROCIC DEANS ANt't Orion PORL6N FATTER
oven In N Cnarte IR AHD WPM
2) RP AND:TLL'NNSGR40I PROF TO NSt4LLNG TOPSOIL AHD •
AFE61D1st1?* AND.TtLL NT4rfAC! oP.N1oGRA0LNC
• L TILL TOMMI. AND SOIL AMEIOMINTS TO A MK S'E DIPN • ,
4) MID TTPN H $PICPIID N PL4Ht EMT. ' .,' •
's
S) tc.•OL FOR'SOp'AND'WITDROMID'Aley TO N t7Sl 3" WITH
• 4MItcMt(T• (r ".TOtN.1.FULLY.TLLED:: .;. .:•(. ': ..:._.••_.
PREP :�.•' D
-MT •ROOT CROW4 •NO Moil MAN I"
NOR wee sus r' YON PILL GRADS
- MULCH A•'NFECIPOD
(Keep meet e N we bane
- TRp Riu ARpac.1AI 4! DRIP.;
MIIS*I'1 M! DIYETIIt'! .
'D{R AtD IN'ION TW6y AND WRAP
MOM TOP AND SDI* or IS001r1LL..
(IRSt'r all *whew •
[ l'
oFS PART 6oL U'1•plMT* TO
MID ram WTry! TOMOIL',
- �6071•4C1lD PLAMMG HNX •
NOTES •
I. LOCATE. PROTECT AND AVOID DISRUPTION OP ALL ADOVE AND of Lau
GRADE UTILITIES AND 61TE FEATURE* PRIOR TO CONETRJCTION.
CONTRACTOR 16 RE$PCN$IDLE FOR ANY RESULTING DAMAGE* DURING
CONSTRUCTION. VERIFY ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CONDITIONS
SHOWN IN PLAN AND CCNDITICN6 M FIELD WITN THE OIU* AND /OR
O0NER6 REPRESENTATIVE. . ...
2. VERPY ALL TREE, 6MRUD, GROUNDCOVER AND LAWN DOUARC- FOOTAGE
QUANTITIES WITH LANDSCAPE ARCNITICT PRIOR TO 6U MITTAL OF DID*
AND'CON$TRUCTION,
3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL,' pp DE SPECIMEN QUALITY WITH SYMMETRICALLY
TRNCID AND FULLY DRANGHED•$HAPE. AND FULL, WEALTHY FOLIAGE,
MEETING OR EXCEEDING AAN OTANDA IDE FOR SIZE AND CONDITION,
(fr
4, LANDSCAPL.WJ AREAS TO DE FULLY IRRIGATED WITN 4 temporary
•
. IRRIGATLOONN46Y6TEM _ hind watering unII plant. are •ItabliNVd..
6. REFER TO DETAILS FOR SOIL PREPARATION FIECUIREMENT$ AND
ADDITIONAL PLANTING IN*TRUCTION6.
6, LANDSCAPE TO LIMITS OF WORK LINE A6 NDICATEDA4 PLAN.
1,COORDINAT[ GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION WNW oven.
S. GCL 'NEWS 4RE[A$ ARE TO DE M.ANTED UNDER U TO TRIES 3' DIAMETER
AROUND TREE TRUNK •
•
E. ALL PLANT MATERIALS *MALL DE KEPT N A Healthy AND GI60WR4G CONDITION
tteoouugdh� pprroo Kt completion. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT WATER
N THEWETL OR TO PROVIDE ADEGLATE IRINGATION TO LANDSCAPE PLANTS
TO MAINTAIN WEALTHY PLANT GROWTH SMALL RESULT IN A REN7JIREMENT FOR THE
. CONTRACTOR TO REPLANT TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS.
•
IO. IOS AMgeerkng plain rot IAIIIty InronlatIOn.
11. • 0D[NOT[6 EXISTING TREES TO DE REMOVED.
Tree Replacement Compliance (18.54.130 #3)
ON/NEAR LOT • TRUE TO SI REMOVRD (TYP[/61ZE) REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT.
6' FRUIT • 1 TREE
IV MAPLE 4 TREES
4•I* IT • .1 TREE
b•.D[CIDUOU6 1TRC!
16'MAPLE: 4TRlE6 ,.
Ib' MAPLC' ..: 4 TRCE$. -..
I MAPLE.- 4 TIM[*
10••PLR 2, TREES
12' FIR.. 7 TREES
.4. DECIDUOUS. 1 TREE.
.• DECIDUOUS 1 TREE
6.' DECIDUQu6 1 TREE,
lo' DICIDBOU6 2 TRC[6 -
:..1 MAPLE':.' 6 TRE[f" "'
P[EI;n IMGU,ATION, 14 NEW TRUE WILL NUD',TO ,S[ PI N4T[D.TO R[PLAC[ ,TN[ TREES • , 1
THAT WALL S[ Irl'IOtilD . :..,TN4 2C% ELOPE AREA. THE LYC6CIP[ Pt I PC TIS STIUIT-
*C4F*;UG own* M HiW 1IN�S.To S[ PLMITID: Ili MUUOM$ION OInWANC[ OFLY IrOU61s$
'TWT;[ACM NEW LOT WMV[ Ens, (U TIM[ P1 IRAC[D, M PRONT.Y.[ACH NEW LOT. TW4It.AR! A :.
.TOTAL OF 31•LOTf.P01t ?MIS,pI.' ? 3611C14404.13 L[AV[,U$ A MUR!•LU/ co H TIM[f. yl....•
'AI60P0*[ TWT.,TM[N .1DDrnoNAW. "•Tlr[f.AT16PT''Tl4 TSR R[I /1C[T'RNT�ORDNMJC/." :.
JOB NO.i
.
DRAW OrAA'AIyt
atDltG(2•LY r.. ::'I.,1
1'11.1 ,p.f
;,.ri�.... . .... _.. _....fie_.
::ETA.
•IDT,TaA,• ;;
EE ;SHEET GN1.''FOR•
S
TRACTS-A, B," &' C
CROSSSECTIONS." .
&PATH PROFILE.:
f•' i,
J }
1 l 1 ''i
til
1111111.11111 1'11111 111111'1111111111 �IIII1111 F11Ii Ifi i111i�i171111�'111'I I'111'I 111'�II'1 }1T� �s _ __._... ..
I ..
9L 61 CL Lt ,'tL';j'`DI''. 6.t .E_._L,.;_,.9..,,9_ Y C Z :- !o
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIDI11111111UIIIInlglllnnluuln01111111011illnulnelnnluldnnllnll