Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L98-0045 - DOWNTOWN HARLEY DAVIDSON - DESIGN REVIEW
L98 -0045 DOWNTOWN HARLEY DAVIDSON 13001 48t'' Ave. So. (DESIGN REVIEW City ,.f Tukwila Department of Community Development - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. August 5, 2002 D02 -080 Date: Plan Check /Permit Number: ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # l ❑ Revision # after Permit is issued Project Name: Downtown Harley Davidson Project Address: 13001 S 48 Av S Contact Person: Brett Jacobsen RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 0 8 2002 PERMIT CENTER Phone Number: 253 - 333 -6789 • Summary of Revision: Pursuant to negotiations with the Planning Department . this revision removes and replaces the grillage of the previous submittal with the addition of a window along the southwesterly portion of the building adjacent to the main parking lot. ( 400 0 i - )19c'J Ati•tt7tlot.60) SheetNumber(s):- - "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date o f revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by:CA' [ Entered in Sierra on g."f -02-- 05/03/02 Tukwila Building Division .6300 SouthCenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188. 206-431-3670 BUILDING DIVISION REVEIW Date: May 2, 2002 Project Name: Downtown Harley Davidson, Building Permit (Decorative Grill) Application #: D02 -080 Plan Review: Ken Nelsen, Sr. Plans Examiner A preliminary Building Division plan review has determined your application to be incomplete. Please address the following comments with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. 1. Submit architectural framing details for the decorative grill, both in plan and cross - section view. Show the full relation to the existing building, include welding and bolt connections. 2. Identifying concrete strength intended for the new footings. 3. The footing design must reference the actual soil condition found in the site - specific Geotechnical report. 4. In the structural calculations, Diagram # 9 has a note referencing to structural drawings. The noted drawing have not been provided. No further comments at this time. • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 1, 2001 Mr. Russell Tom Downtown Harley Davidson 13001 48th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Modification to Design Review Approved for Downtown Harley Davidson Dear Mr. Tom: Thank you very much for faxing the revised drawings on October 30, 2001 to address the issue of the window that was added to the south facade of the Harley Davidson building without Planning Commission review and approval. We have had a chance to review the elevations that you faxed and find that they are acceptable in addressing the window issue, with one exception. The faxed elevations show a sign above the window, centered in the south facade. Under the City's sign code, businesses are limited to two signs, either a freestanding sign and a wall sign, or two wall signs. Currently, Downtown Harley Davidson has a freestanding sign on the west side of the site and a wall sign on the east wall of the building. If you wish to install a sign on the south wall, then one of the other signs must be removed. The next step is to apply for a building permit to install the awning extension. If you wish to revise the signage on the site, please apply for a sign permit, which will be reviewed separately from the permit for the awnings. If you have any questions, please call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, U46,( - fLJt- Carol Lurrib Associate Planner cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Deb Ritter, Associate Planner Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator c: \mydocs \Harley Davidson \Toni -Itr 2.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 - City of Tukwila Department of Community Development October 17, 2001 Mr. Russell Tom Downtown Harley Davidson 13001 48th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98188 Steven M. Mullet, Steve Lancaster, D • By Certified Mail RE: Modification to Design Review Approved for Downtown Harley Davidson Dear Mr. Tom: On May 12, 2000 you posted a bond in the amount of $2,398 to cover the cost of removing the window inserted into the south facade of the remodeled building at 13001 48`x' Avenue South. This window was not part of the design reviewed and approved by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR) on November 12, 1999. The bond was posted in order to obtain Planning sign off for occupancy of the remodeled building. Work associated with the bond was to be completed by December 31, 2000. A public hearing on a revision to the design approved by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review was scheduled for June 22, 2000. At your request the hearing before the BAR was postponed in order to discuss design options for the window. On December 22, 2000 you faxed us several awning proposals to review, on which we provided verbal comments. Since that time we have been unable to reach you to discuss how you plan to proceed with addressing the window issue. As we've discussed in the past, there are several options available: remove the window, add a second window to balance the facade, or add an awning treatment across the entire south facade that mimics or complements the design on the front of the building (western facade). You must notify us in writing by October 31, 2001 how you plan to proceed on this issue. If we do not hear from you by October 3 we will utilize the posted bond to restore the south facade to the design approved by the BAR in 1999. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3 Mr. Russell Tom Downtown Harley Davidson October 17, 2001 If you have any questions, please call me at 431 -3686 or Carol Lumb at 431 -3661. Sincerely, Planning Manager cc: Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development Bob Noe, City Attorney Carol Lumb, Associate Planner Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator z. z w' 4. J 0 U 0; Up u) w w =; w • O J' 0 S' =CI I—_ Z� I— 0 uj U to w W. 1-"' 7—w U. 0 fA I Ii 0 c: \mydocs \Harley Davidson \Tom- ItrI.doc '� 12/22/2000 13:26 2062411134 DOWNTOWN HARLEY 09/13/2000 13: 44 2052850326 NORTHWEST AWNING FL►B 2800 West Cornmodore Way Seattle, WA 911499 Phone 208.280.2941 Pax 708.288.0328 $NORTHAF141PC Russell Tom Downtown Harley 13001 48th Ave S. Seattle, WA 98168 C'-t1 oP TLttw<< -A C Ic JZ. d yt~. n� PAGE 02 PAGE 01 4131- 3 fo 45 L{ 3t 36G/ Russell 9/11/00 Hero ore Imo options and pricing to provide an awning over the window on your building. I apologise for the delay in getting this infbrmadon back to you. 1 spoke with a planner from the City of Tukwila who is handling your aitoation and was unable to get say Baal guidelines to work with in. However I was cold that they would not allow any additional aignage to the property. gbdiudi Standard type awnings that can be configured in a variety of ways (please see the attached sketch for the available styles). The specifications cad pricing for those styles are listed below. Frames: Welded ahuninwn tubing Finish: Mill finish. Powder coating or painting is available at an additional cost Style: Three point Wedge Three point with- Free hanging valance Foos point wedge Fabric: Webion- vinyl coated polyester. Color: To be doesemined Dimensions: Wall Height 36 "- 48 ", Prgjocdon 36 "- 48 ", length 11'-0" Prke: Three point- 51660.00 Three point w/ valance $1780.00 Four point- S1R30.00 Pricing does not include state sales tax or any permit foes, however I have included in our ptcng the cost of obtaining the permit. 12/22/2000 13:26 2062411134 DOWNTOWN HARLEY 09/13/2000 13:44 2062850326 NORTHWEST AWNING FAS The idea behind this awning is to match or resemble the steel and cable work you have existing over your sidewalks. You input would be needed on some oldie details but I think you will got the idea of what I have in mind. PAGE 03 PAGE 02 The fin= would be cantilevered from the wall using cables for support and to proveot uplift. The framsworlc would be fabricated using a 2"-3" galvanized square tubing. With in the ilemowork we could lace fabric or mush or as an additional option steel grating similar to that nand an you interior catwalk could be placed inside the perimeter of the awning. (See Sketch) Price: 54,360.00 This price does not include state sales tax. permit or engineering fees that may be asscued. Thanks for the oppommity to provide you with pricing on this. I would be happy to meet with you to savior arty questions or provide you with more information so you are able to begin making decision. Feel free to give me a call. z . �w • 2 J U'. U0 U 0 W =. J F. W 0. Q! • 'w D. _a W ZH F- O Z OU .0Hi W Z."); .. Z U •Off' Z W J OC Ow A = V LL. 4 p Z fY W W Xa J OC WW CL 1 Ld OC y Ld m. 5 H"2 u. 01 u L LL } W -J Wo Z Z Q 3 °=. iitea¢ 3 =3 W F= co W x U 4 J Ld co ympaQ4. ERmla O0 39dd 50 3Jtid �, 9ZE098Z90Z DD :£L 000Z/ET /60 VETtttZ90Z 9Z:E1 O002 /Min CUSTOMER* DOWNTOWN HARLEY PROJECT* WINDOW AWNING 13001 48TH AVE S. SEATTLE, WA 981`68 Fabric: TO BE DETERMINED NORTHWEST AWNING 8. FABRIC, 2600 W. COMMODORE WAY SEAT TLE,WA 98199 PHONE' 206 -285 -2941 FAX* 206 - 285 -0326 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED JUNE 13, 2000 HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA DETERMINATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: STAFF: June 22, 2000 On June 2, 2000 Notice of Application was posted and mailed to surrounding properties. Notice of Hearing was posted and mailed to surrounding properties and mailed to the Seattle Times for publication on June 7, 2000. L2000 -024 Conditional Use Permit VoiceStream Wireless Antenzana Investments Conditional Use Permit approval for the installation of a Personal Communications Service facility on an office building rooftop. The project will have a 3- sector array with 2 antennae per sector. Operating equipment will be located on a slab on grade south and next to the building. 15215 52 "d Ave S, Tukwila, WA Development Permit Exempt Office (0) Office (0) Art Pederson 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 , Staff Report to the L2000 -024 Planning Commission VoiceStream Wireless 15215 52nd Ave S ATTACHMENTS: A. Title Sheet B. Site Plan C. Equipment Plan D. Elevations E. Photosimulations F. Coverage Plots G. Conditional Use Permit Application FINDINGS Vicinity /Site Information Project Description The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to install a Personal Communication Service (PCS) Base Station at 15215 52nd Ave S. The applicant is proposing installation of 6 antennae, to be divided into three sectors and to be mounted on the rooftop of the existing office building. Associated operating equipment will located adjacent to the building on a slab on grade. Existing Development The Parkridge Office Building, a two story structure. Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is in the southwest corner of the Office (0) zone that is bordered by Interstate 5 to the east and 51" Ave S to the west. To the south is the Regional Commercial Mixed -Use (RCM) zone and to the west across 515` Ave S is a LDR zone. To the north in the 0 zone is an apartment building. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The proposed project must conform with criteria detailed in TMC 18.64.050, (1 -5), concerning Conditional Use Permits: (1) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is located. The applicant has included site plans, elevations and photosimulations showing the proposed antennae. The proposed site is a two -story office building in an Office zone. The facility is ~w JU 0 Up' W =: J 1- U) LL u O gQ co = d. �w z l=. 1— O zF— ui U� of—. ww 1— U — O: ow co' Staff Report to the Planning Commission VoiceStream Wireless 15215 52nd Ave S telecommunications equipment that falls within the safety parameters set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and below the FCC standards for maximum exposure to radio frequency energy. L2000 -024 (2) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. The Development Standards for uses in the Office (0) zone include a maximum height of 3 stories or 35 feet. The building is 26'and with the addition of the proposed 11' antennae assembly (only 9' of which will extend above the roof parapet line) the over all height will be 35'. (3) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. As with similar uses, the base station will generate trips during the construction period and, following the completion of construction, up to 1 trip per month for maintenance. The operating equipment will be located on a slab on grade on the south side of the building and facing a RCM zone. To reduce visual/building design impacts the applicant is offering to paint the antennae to match the building color or the sky or general "ambience" of the background. (4) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan z F- w re 2 JU 00 111 (/) U1 wO �< • a �w Z= zo 1.1J uj U0 O co — O I- ww H V u- o. .z lb co By locating on an existing building, the proposal abides by the Comprehensive Plan goal of o minimizing the number of free standing cellular sites and their visual impact while z accommodating the expansion of appropriate telecommunications capacity and coverage. 5) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts that the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The applicant intends to locate on an existing structure in lieu of proposing a separate support structure for their antennae. CONCLUSIONS Staff makes the following findings and conclusions under the city's Conditional Use Permit criteria (TMC 18.64.050): (1) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare... The location of the antennae on the rooftop and the operating equipment behind a fence will make potentially hazardous operating equipment inaccessible to the public. Both the operational 3 Staff Report to the L2000 -024 Planning Commission VoiceStream Wireless 15215 52nd Ave S bandwidth and low power and high frequency of this station's signals are within federal safety guidelines, consequently there will be no interference with TV or radio reception or negative health effects. Also, by mounting the antennae below the parapet line physical intrusions or significant visual impacts on the surrounding area are avoided. (2) The proposed criteria shall meet or exceed the performance standards... All applicable development standards in this zone have been met. The proposed installation will be at the maximum allowed height limit for this zone (35'). The applicant proposes to screen the equipment cabinet to be located on grade with a 6' cedar fence. As this equipment will not be clearly visible from either 5ls` or 52 " Avenues S, and be partially recessed beneath the cantilevered second floor, the proposed fence should be adequate for screening now and in the future when the wooded and vacant parcel to the south is developed. (3) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding... The installation of PCS antennae on an office rooftop is a compatible use for the Office and RCM zones. Their location near to Interstate 5 is also compatible with this environment and will serve the travelling public. In the past, painting antennae to match the building color have reduced visual ' impacts on views and building design. Here, the slender profile of the antennae and their supports, if painted to match the building, would render them unintrusive to the surrounding areas. Because of the sharp incline of the hill to the west and toward the LDR zone the view out from the LDR area, in addition to being blocked by substantial tree growth, will be above the proposed antennae and not be blocked by their presence. No other impacts to pedestrian or transportation movements are anticipated. (4) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies... The addition of this facility is within the intention of the Comprehensive Plan and associated zoning by providing support for "areas appropriate for professional and administrative offices" and, in the RCM directly to the south, serving "high intensity regional uses ". Again, by locating on an existing structure this proposal also furthers the Comprehensive Plan goals for the siting of telecommunications facilities. (5) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts... The antennae will be mounted below the parapet of the existing roof thereby hiding from view much of the base support structure and connections. The antennae themselves have a narrow profile that will minimize their visual impacts to the surrounding buildings and neighborhood uphill to the west. (Please see photo simulations.) The equipment cabinets, by location on grade, will not add a bulky presence to the roof. Also, the applicant is open to painting both the antennae and supports the color of the building in order to minimize their visual impact. � 4 Staff Report to the L2000 -024 Planning Commission VoiceStream Wireless 15215 52nd Ave S RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with this additional requirement: • The antennae, both front and back, and any supports above the parapet line be painted to match the building color. 5 ` N View looking Northwest Z W re 2 6 JU 0 CO 0 CO LLI J= I- CD LL WO 2 u. CO 2 a. I- In Z= I- O Z W U O P O I- W W • U u. ~O .. Z: W U= OH Z View looking Southea Z • W a� aU O 0 co o W= J H �L WO Q 2• d �W Z= 1- O. Z 1- W W V O. O -. O I- WW" 2 F -"- O .Z W F- OH Z WIN VIII! WINN 11111/11 "MIN 1111•11 z ~Z WD J O 0 cna U w J = w • 0 Q lL • Q =d �--'W Z H0 z� w � Q O • D- Q 1- ww 2 HP - O .. z w U - P O ~ z Coverage Plot Key GREEN Cell phone will work when user is outdoors only YELLOW Cell phone will work when used in moving car ORANGE Cell phone will work when users are inside their homes RED Cell phone will work when used inside small office buildings BLUE Cell phone will work when user is in high rise office building VoiceStream Wireless SE3999.A (Parkridge) City of Tukwila May 15, 2000 RECEIVED MAY 1 9 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r 4 z. HZ J 0 00 co ❑. W =: JH.. w O. u.?.. Y2 a z - w` Z� I- O' Z I- w • co CI ▪ w'. H �!- O. Z LLI O 1-; z CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@citukwila.wa.us CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CITY OF TUKWIL . NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 1 c'2lvc; -G (s L3 , A) ctc��cz ,fJN1 bD T S S ,S(Tf LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 15-2,(5 5210D vr,NLE, S3 Quarter:91J Section: 23_ Township: 23A1 Range:O4E (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. CID( .< Sr\crr'( Name: Address: Phone: 4'2_5 34 34 I ca W 4-25-- g (D5 - g 5 S!•,Z Signature: G.\AP P HAN\LANDUSE. APP\CUPCKLST. DOC. 17/07/99 FAX: c Vcatcr. r.€AY\ Date: 5_ 2. -oo Attachment G The review criteria for various types of projects are shown below. Please discuss development consistency with each criteria. Then, refer to the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan for project consistency with the policies. Please note that more than one category of policies may apply. RECEI tEU CITY r)C ri Criteria for Conditional Uses (TMC 18.64.030) 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious oEi e c p p ro e rty or improvements in the vicinity. en . The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development re ulations that are required in the district it will occupy. p -ATi4(J1J' S s 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan.. A7T").. CIrk M_,t\ST. • 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the in area which it is located. SF., fri CT‘C.AN1p.lsl . GAAPPHANU.ANDUSE.APPtCUPCKLST. DOC. 17/07/99 ATTACHMENT TO REVIEW CRITERIA FORM VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CUP APPLICATION: PARKRIDGE SITE (SE3999 A) Criteria for Conditional Uses (TMC 18.64.030) 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. VoiceStream Wireless' proposed use is a PCS (Personal Communications Service) facility. It will be operated in conformance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations for a wireless provider. The facility will be constructed using only contractors licensed in Washington State and in compliance with all applicable building requirements and regulations. VoiceStream's proposed facility would be beneficial to the general public welfare. In addition to facilitating everyday business and personal transactions, this facility will increase the reliability of communications between law enforcement, emergency response and disaster relief teams when conventional landline communication is not possible. Studies have also shown that a high percentage of individuals who have cellular /PCS service do so for safety reasons Therefore, VoiceStream Wireless will be enhancing public safety by providing PCS service to the residents of Tukwila. Minimal traffic would be generated during the construction phase while the crew is traveling to and from the site. After construction is completed, pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the facility would be limited to one visit per month by a technician for routine maintenance. This increase in traffic flow will not be hazardous or conflict with existing and anticipated traffic in the neighborhood. Site visits typically occur during off: peak traffic periods and, therefore, no noticeable change would be experienced by this neighborhood. The proposed facility will not require the expansion of public facilities and services for its construction, operation and maintenance. Access to the site would be achieved using existing roadways, including SouthcenterBoulevard and 521d Avenue South. The site will be unstaffed and will not require water, waste treatment or management of hazardous waste. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. The proposed VoiceSt vam Wireless facility complies with all height and setback requirements for the 0 District. The antennas associated with the facility are rectangular in shape with the following dimensions: 72" .high by 8" wide by 2.75" deep. The electronic support equipment consists of small cabinets with the following dimensions: 52.2 " high by 90.9" wide by 44.0" deep. The antennas associated are manufactured in a neutral color and can be painted to suit Tukwila requirements in either a non glare color matching that of the VoiceStream Wireless Site: Parkridge (SE3999.A) City of Tukwila CUP Application May 19, 2000 p.1 existing building, or - other color which will blend with the Puget Sound area skies. The electronic equipment cabinets are also manufactured in a neutral color. They will be screened in part by tb existing building, as well as by a wooden fence. The facility requires no additional parkin as it would be unstaffed; a field technician would visit the site once per month and use a 'sting on -site parking. 3. The proposed de uses. lopment shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land The proposed VoiceStream Wireless rooftop facility is similar in size and appearance to otherrooftop facili 'es located in Tukwila. Roof-mounting of telecommunications equipment is generall the least obtrusive means ofproviding wireless services to the community. The pro osed facility would be inconspicuous to surrounding building occupants, nearby res dents and passers -by. The proposed use is also a business use that is consistent with the ounding business activities. The proposed facility is unstaffed and would be briefly visit d once per month by a technician for routine maintenance activities, but would not interf e with any other commercial activity on the subject or adjacent properties. The subject property is occupied by a two -story office building. Adjacent development include office buildings and multifamily residences to the north; office and commercial buildings and the Interstate 5I igh way to the east and south; and, single family residential properties o the west. Mounting the antennas on the large, flatroofofthe building provides the minimum possible exposure of pment to view while still enabling VoiceStream Wireless to achieve its desired coverage o jectives. The antennas are no larger than otherrooftop appurtenances already present on th subject and neighboring buildings The antennas would be painted a non glare color and p aced to blend into the building. They would be minimally visible to passers -by in the immediate vicinity. The electronic equipment cabinets would be located at ground level on the south side ofthe building and completely screened by the building itself and a wooden fence. Visibility ofthe proposed VoiceStream facility from buildings to the north, south and east 's limited by distance and the small scale ofthe antennas and equipment relative to .ize ofexistingstructures on the subject and adjacent properties. The I -5 freeway provides bstantial buffering to properties located further east. Southcenter Boulevard and existin. trees provide additional buffering to properties located further south. Visibility ofthe propo ed facility from nearby business and residential properties to the west is minimized due to e steep terrain risingimmediately adjacent to the subject property and existing tree cover. • VoiceStream Wireless Site: Parkridge (SE3999.A) City of Tukwila CUP Application May 19, 2000 p.2 '' 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land . e Policy Plan. Goal 1 '.1 ofthe Tukwila Comprehensive Plan seeks "[uJtility services and facilities that meet the c unity's current and future needs in a safe, reliable, efficient, economic and environm - tally responsible manner. Applic r ble policies concerning telecommunications are found under General Policies 12.1.34 an ' 12.1.36. General Policy 12.1.34 provides that the City is to "[ajctively coordinate •rojectimplementation with individual utilities based upon Tukwila's ComprehersivePlan and development regulations." General Policy 121.36 provides that the City is o "[eJncourage utilities to consolidate facilities and minimize visual impact of facilities w ere technically feasible." Th : proposed VoiceStream Wireless facility is in keeping with both of these General Policies be ause VoiceStream seeks approval for this project under the Conditional Use Permitrevr wprocess Moreover, by siting the facility on the roofofthe existing building, located at 5215 52' Avenue South, VoiceStream isminimizing the potential visual impact oftbe fa as well as following the Implementation Strategy set forth under General Policy 12136 which directs wireless carriers to use existing structures 5. All me ures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the propos d use may have on the area in which it is located. The an ennas associated with the facility are manufactured in a neutral color and can be painted to 't Tukwila requirements in either a non glare color matching that ofthe existing building, o another shade which will blend with the Puget Sound area skies. The electronic equipment cabinets are also manufactured in a neutral color. They will be screened in part by the exis ' g building, as well as by a wooden fence. Se eral photosimulations the proposed facility are enclosed with this application, depicting the antennas on the roofofthe existing building. The views shown are as follows: 1) 2) 3) looking southwest to the existing building and proposed facility; looking northwest to the existing building and proposed facility; and, looking southeast to the existing building and proposed facility. As s dear from the photosimulations, use of matching paint for the antennas, coupled WI their diminutive profile, will minimize the visibility ofthe facility from adjacent b dings and street level. The small size of the antennas, relative to the large building o which they would be located and other large structures in the vicinity, would further Mize their visual impact to the surrounding neighborhood. The electronic equipment cabinets would not be visible at all from the street level or adjacent properties VoiceStream Wireless Site: Parkridge (SE3999.A) City of Tukwila CUP Application May 19, 2000 p.3 Greg Zaputil Rudolph Zaputil 15171 52nd Ave. S. #5 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2389 (206) 242 -9945 06/16/00 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Art Pederson RE: File #L2000 -024 (Conditional Use Permit) (Voice Stream Wireless PCS Antenna) Dear Planning Commission, RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 6 2000 PERMIT CENTER We are the owners of the duplex and triplex located at 15151 and 15171 52nd Ave. S. We built these units in 1979 and have enjoyed living in Tukwila ever since. We are very familiar with Tukwila's high standards and are appreciative of them. First of all we would like to thank Art Pederson for his time and explanations of the project. We greatly appreciated his prompt follow up on some questions we had. The project proposed does concern us, as we strongly question the choice of location. 52nd Ave. is a pleasant mix of residential and office buildings. The office buildings presently located on the street are all aesthetically pleasing: they have clean lines and are visually uncluttered. As we understand it, the city has already approved PCS antenna of a competing company on top of the building occupied by Amour on the Boulevard on Southcenter Blvd. : just around the corner. It is one of our concerns that this will precipitate more antenna on buildings in our area. With Tukwila having such a large urban center, we see no reason for the antenna to encroach on residential areas at all. PLEASE NOTE: This is an addition to the Application Packet. Letter was submitted after Staff Report was completed. Art Pederson Another concern of ours, as well as the 4 other families who reside in our units, are the health issues. Although we have all seen reports in the media that the public should not be concerned by living in close proximity to antenna (cellular, PCS, etc.), we have also seen reports to the contrary. With an antenna within 160 feet of our bedroom it does make us wonder. Once again with the vast amount of non - residential area in Tukwila, would it not be more prudent to locate the antenna within the urban/commercial center? We look forward to discussing these issues further at the June 22, 2000 meeting and are confident that our city will understand, address, and uphold our concerns. Please feel free to contact us. Thank you very much, Greg Zaputil Rudolph Zaputil z �w Daw J V UO U 0 w i` J F fA LL: w 0 u (a = w` H = z� 1-0. z� w o 0 S1 o F- uj I- w Z o f Z ,Wynetta Biyens Timenotice.doc Page 1 CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural z Review will be holding a worksession at 6:00 p.m. and public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on June 22, i w 2000, located at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., to discuss the following: re WORKSESSION J U v o The Planning Commission will be reviewing the Draft Shoreline Master Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING w O CASE NUMBER: L2000 -024 (Conditional Use Permit) u. j APPLICANT: Voice Stream Wireless Inc. co a REQUEST: Instatllation of a three sector six antenna Personal Communication I w Service (PCS) on the rooftop of the office building at this address. z i Operating equipment will be slab on grade south an next to the building. 1— 0 LOCATION: 15215 52nd Ave S, Tukwila, WA z U0 OD BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) PUBLIC HEARING 0 F- w_w CASE NUMBER: L98 -0045 (Design Review) APPLICANT: Downton Harley Davidson u_ O' REQUEST: Modification to BAR approved design of commercial structure. ui z LOCATION: 13001 48' Ave S U _ O ~' Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement, or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division at 431 -3670. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: June 9, 2000, Seattle Times Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, and Adjacent Property Owners, File. z Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, G f kot L Mk) 6o HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other . Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this S _ day of in the year 2000 -: udcl t) Pa.4. °g RacweL. Project Name Project Number: L- 0O c-t5 Mailer's Signature: P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT- MAIL01/24/0011:44 AM City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development JUNE 8, 2000 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Steve Lancaster, Director Downtown Harley Davidson has requested a revision to Board of Architectural Review approved filed, Number L98- 00454, to obtain approval for a window added to the south facade of a 34,000 square foot retail store at 1300148th Avenue South. You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing scheduled for June 22, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. before the Board of Architectural Review. The hearing will take place at City Hall in City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. To confirm the time and date before the hearing, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Previously Approved Permits include: • Design Review • SEPA Checklist • Land Altering Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. c:\caro Iki typkg \pubnot. doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206.431 -3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Q • W. cc 6 J 0 O! W= _J- w 0r IL Q` co =' c% H=. Z� 1-0+ Z t-- 2 U� 0 t=. 0 F- w w` F= --O Z w -- 2i 01— Z City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director JUNE 8, 2000 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Downtown Harley Davidson has requested a revision to Board of Architectural Review approved filed, Number L98- 00454, to obtain approval for a window added to the south facade of a 34,000 square foot retail store at 13001 48th Avenue South. You are invited to continent on the project at a public hearing scheduled for June 22, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. before the Board of Architectural Review. The hearing will take place at City Hall in City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. To confirm the time and date before the hearing, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Previously Approved Permits include: • Design Review • SEPA Checklist • Land Altering Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. c: \taro I \c i typkg \pubnot.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 ! z Wiz' w. aa 2 JU 00 gyp. CO =. J H. wo. 2 gQ co = o. I-w z� o. z i- w U• �, -. w w' :H U 0 wz `U I O t— z # I INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project: 1 Jt - 14.,t. , 1 CL, � ;p {- (:"L'..iJ.' `! ?l Type of Inspection: F.i44,7 li141tsy'01,1'14 --, 7 Address: , rA j Datg called: s Special instructions: f° Date wanted: _l AO 5- I`j � 00 CD p.m. Requester: Phone: gel J-- 4 g zed : - Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection: Receipt No: Date:. City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION MEMO TO THE FILE DATE: May 17, 2000 APPLICANT: Downtown Harley Davidson RE: D99 -0259 ADDRESS: 13001 48th Avenue South The applicant has posted a bond for 150% of the labor and material costs to remove the window on the south facade that was installed without prior approval of the Department of Community Development. The window was not part of the project reviewed and approved by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) November 12, 1999. The modification to the building will be reviewed by the BAR at its June 22 "d meeting. Posting the bond was required in order to obtain Planning sign off for occupancy of the building. q: \carol \general \d99 - 0259 -2.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 .. .. . . .. ........ . . .. .. ,. _ RF F-IVED City of Tukwila '99 /Q 00 OQd CITY rUKWIbEVELOPER'S PR.,'JECT WARRANTY REQUEST FORM • per - • •• •.•ed b ,G•` sf NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: DOW NMINN 14 AR1 FY DAVIDSC�N DATE: n� /17 /7npn DEVELOPMENTADDRESS: 13001 48th Avenue South PERMITNO.: D99-0259 CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: DOWNTOWN HART EY DAVIDSON TEL NO. 06 7 8457 SHALL BE REFUNDED ADDRESS: BY MAILING TO: 13001 48th Avenue South (please print) CITY/STATE/ZIP Tukwila, Washinaton 98168 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE PLANS /DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBED); REMOVE THE WINDOW IN OFFICE #1, VISIBLE ON THE 48th AVENUE BUILDING FACADE OR OTHER MEASURES REQUIRED BY THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ 7 1411_ nn ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 17 / 31 / nn ), or risk having the City use these nds to ca gut the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereb - • • raze th= to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to co -�- - �� • sted above prior to requesting inspection and release of these funds. SIGNED: TITLE: EC TI _fie Camp efed' ��¢¢ Ge/t/t -2 ' AMOUNTaI" 2.131 CASH U CASH EQUIVALENT SIGNED: THIS FU D IS AUTHORIZED TO BE ACCEPTED. DEPARTMENT HEAD: DEPOSITED THIS DATE: 6 -j -co CITY RECEIPT NO. ,.118 002.5 SET1CM�f 3 pia be r:ompl�ted~ b afnetoper) .:. 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE: pretax° • RECEIVED BY: • All work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed and retumed to department which authorized warranty. I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent. DATE: I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore authorize the release of the above cash assignment. CHECKED BY: AUTHORIZED BY: DEPARTMENT: 'be ctpltedb� AMOUNT: • CASH EQUIVALENT— LEI 1 tR AUTHORIZING RELEASE RELEASED THIS DATE: CASH CRY CHECK NO. RELEASED BY: , FINANCE DEPT. .�.[•)qV.\\r+++ \[ \�q:[•:KK� %OOY�H[YIXr.: /RM[o00h \•0.0•X. NK•Oi)Jt�CYwM000JOlofJA. bONq'KP �tt[[[ <KKR[�.MtOwVQ \ \V4AtQ�iM \ \�\�%Jq Wq h Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: — Developer — Finance Department — Permit Coordinator, DCD • V+. Upon completion of entire foram, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD 09/13/90 i -00 TUE 07:33 AM LAPr1ARK DEVELOPMENT TO: W FIORILLO NORTHWEST 11 3 INC. 131 SOUTHWEST 1S6TH, SEATTLE, WA 99166 P.O. BOX 66826, SEATTLE, WA 991680826 (206) 241.2130 FAX (206) 241 -2630 Russell & Jennifer Tom 6727 MLK Jr. Way South Seattle, Washington 98118 FAX NO, 20a 241 2630 P. 02 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 9210 - 3 hone: Date: 03/17/00 JOB NAME /LOCATION: Downtown Harley Davidson 13001 48th Avenue Tukwila, Washington 98168 Job Number: 9910 Job Phone: (206) 244 -6091 • Existing Contract Number: 9910 Date of Existing Contract: 11/29/99 J We hereby agree to make the change(s) specified below: Provide all labor, equipment, material, subcontractors and supervision as required for the removal of exisiting window from office #1 and for the restoration of said structure (includes removal of window and disposal, drywall and metal building restoration, and painting), for the lump sum price of: 1,454.62 WA. State B & 0 Tax, PO and PL insurance WA State Sales and Tax Note: This Change Order becomes part of and in conformance with the existing contract. 17.46 126.60 This Change Order (increases) (decreases) the date of substantial completion by WE AGREE hereby to make the change(s) specified above at this price 0 additional work day. ADD $ 1,598.68 DATE PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 111111411111111111 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE X REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT ACCEPTED • The above prices and specifications of this Change Order aro satifsfactory and are hereby accepted. All work to be performed under same Corms and conditions as specified in original contract unless otherwise stipulated DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: SIGNATURE FlORIU.O NORTHWEST INC. City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: April 27, 2000 APPLICANT: Downtown Harley- Davidson RE: D99 -0259 ADDRESS: 13001 48th Avenue South Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revision, Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. 1. The revision submitted is for a minor modification made to the building without the opportunity for Board of Architectural Review or City staff review and approval. The revision as submitted cannot be approved. The building received design approval (L98 -0045) by the Board of Architectural Review November 12, 1998. If the City had had an opportunity to review this modification, the applicant would have been asked to design a window treatment that is balanced on the south wall of the building. To remedy the unauthorized insertion of the window in the south facade, there are the following suggested options: a. Restore the facade to the appearance approved by the Board of Architectural Review (i.e. remove the window). , b. Add a window to balance the facade appearance. c. Provide some other facade treatment that balances the small window that was inserted. Please revise the submittal to reflect one of the options noted above. Michael Jenkins discussed with you the need to resolve this issue prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO). As an alternative, you may post a bond for 150% of the labor and material costs associated with adding an additional window on the south facade if this issue is not resolve prior to the building being ready for CO. cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager q: \carol \general\2000- memos \d2000 -0259. doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 March 16, 2000 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Russell Tom Downtown Harley Davidson 6727 Martin Luther King Drive Seattle, WA 98118 Re: Downtown Harley Davidson, 13001 — 48th Ave S. (D99 -0259) Dear Russ: Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Thanks for meeting with me yesterday about the changes made to the south facade. To re- iterate the process we will follow to evaluate how the facade changes, you will be submitting a revision to the Building Permit showing the window on the building elevations and all other related plan sheets. Once this revision is submitted, we will review it and determine how the facade must be altered for the change to be consistent with the Design Review approval made by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR). z �w -3 Uo CO 0 w= 1- S2w w0 �_ �w z= 1._ 1- o w~ uj UCa O N o I- ww 1-- U If you do not agree with the additional revisions we request, we will proceed with a meeting Z` before the BAR for their review and approval. If we do go to this meeting, the possible outcomes include: o 1— z • Changing the facade to match what was originally approved • Adding additional features • Acceptance of the revision without additional modifications As we discussed, a bond must be submitted prior to the Planning Department approval for issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO). The bond will be for 150% of the labor and material costs associated with adding an additional window and grillage on the south facade. I have enclosed a copy of the Bond form. The Director of Community Development must approve the bond before I can approve the building for issuance of the CO. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Associate Planner cc: Brett Jacobsen, Fiorillo Northwest 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 March 7, 2000 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Russell Tom Downtown Harley Davidson 6727 Martin Luther King Drive Seattle, WA 98118 Re: Downtown Harley Davidson, 13001 — 48`" Ave S. (D99 -0259) Dear Russ: z 1 ~w 2 00 (00 • w J w • ° 1< Y' a �w z. �- o. Z F- LU al On March 6, 2000 I drove by the Downtown Harley Davidson project to see how the project was progressing. On my inspection I found a major discrepancy between the plans approved by the o Board of Architectural Review and the on -site conditions. During construction, a new window 0 was installed along the south facade where the proposed wall sign was located. This window w w was not part of what was reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review, nor does there appear to be an approved revision that was submitted for review by the City. LL- At a minimum, new plans that fully document the change must be submitted to the City in an 1- expedited manner. In addition, to ensure that the project does not have to return to the Board of z Architectural Review to evaluate the change to this facade, any new addition must be made so that it reflects the overall character of the building. I would like to meet with you or Brett Jacobsen to determine how this can be resolved so there is no delay in issuing your Certificate of Occupancy. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Associate Planner cc: Brett Jacobsen, Fiorillo Northwest Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS FILE: D99 -0259 APPLICANT: Downtown Harley Davidson ADDRESS: 13001 — 48th Ave S. DATE: August 4, 1999 The Department of Community Development, Planning Division, has completed its review of the application materials you submitted on July 29, 1999. The following comments and / or corrections must be addressed before we can recommend approval of your permit: 1. At their November 12, 1998 hearing, the Board of Architectural Review approved the color of the metal roof (sand), metal facade (almond) and colors for CMU base (natural). These features are not indicated on your plans. Please revise your plans accordingly. 2. Please indicate the color of both the metal trim and parapet on your plans. These features should also be of the same color to be consistent with the Board of Architectural Review approval. Please note that a separate sign permit will be required for both the freestanding and wall signs. The approval of a Development Permit does not result in approval of a sign permit. Please be aware that you will probably receive comments and/or corrections from other City departments as well. When you re- submit your corrected plans for further review, your re- submittal must respond to the comments of all City departments concurrently. You will know when you have received the comments from all departments involved in the review and approval of your project when you receive a "Correction Letter" from the City's Permit Coordinator. The Permit Center cannot accept your re- submittal until after you have received a Correction Letter reflecting all departmental comments and correction. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the,Planning Division comments and corrections, please contact Michael Jenkins at (206) 431 -3670. If you have any other questions regarding the status of your permit application, please contact the Permit Center at (206) 431- 3670. cc: Permit Center Reviewing Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N I, 0 J\IQL&_ hereby declare that: Li Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - significance O Notice of Public Meeting 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance LI Board of Adjustment Agenda 1 Determination of Significance Packet and Scoping Notice ONotice of Action []Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Official Notice fl Short Subdivision Agenda 0 Other Packet []Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LIShoreline Management Permit Other n was mailed to each of the following addresses on (V1 �'53 Name of Project Q Signature File Number L t !�U cx�,� z w 00 co 0' co w J 2 1._ co w w0 2 J u_ ?. ca _, z� hO z I- w 2o 0 I-' w'. H 0 ~o wz 0 z To: City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION November 13, 1998 • Harley Davidson (applicant) • Russell Tom (owner) • King County Assessor, Accounting Division • Parties of record (See Attached) u- w O ?. co =w This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170. At their November 12, I-- H 1998 public hearing, the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved the applicant's request for a z O 34,000 square foot retail /warehouse building. The BAR approved the Design Review application with the 11J uj following conditions: U O 5 O F- w_ uj 1. The applicant shall revise the lighting plan reflected in the landscape plan to include both 0 building mount and pole lighting on the north and east property line, to be approved by the u_ ~O Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. iu z U= 2. The applicant shall provide pedestrian - oriented lighting along all sidewalks, to be approved by the p E- Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. z 3. The applicant shall provide ground mounted lighting directed to the facade on all sides of the building, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant shall include a minimum of three courses of smooth face CMU block within the proposed 7 foot CMU building base. The smooth face course shall be of similar coloration as the ground face block and shall be a minimum of one foot in width. PROJECT BACKGROUND a. Project file number: L98 -0045 b. The name of the property owner(s): Russell Tom 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • • -November 13,1998 Notice of Decision L98 -0045 - Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48th Ave. S. c. Project Description: Textual description as well as 8.5" x 11" site plans, building elevations and other appropriate characteristics. Design Review approval of a 34,000 square foot retail/warehouse building, to include 66 parking spaces d. Project location: 13001- 48th Ave S. e. The permits submitted concurrently with this application: None f. Environmental threshold determination (if any): Determination of Non - Significance, issued'October 28, 1998 Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. h. Administrative appeals for the various permit Types are discussed below. g. The period for administrative appeals is 14 days, starting from the issuance of this Notice of Decision. The administrative body hearing the appeal is the City Council. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials shall contain: 1. The name of the appealing party, 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party, and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to received notices on the appealing party's behalf, and A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits) are available for inspection at the Tukwila Dept. of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Blvd.; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. The project planner is Michael Jenkins, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3685 for further information. _ November 13,1998 Notice of Decision L98 -0045 - Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48th Ave. S. Parties of Record John McKenna Fiorello Northwest P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166 -0826 O E 0 gi . nl•M • no c E^ LEGAL DESCRIPTICN X W 0 111 N •w, r • n2' �' r 11111;;;; °°t hf 6 1 .d ifln g u }° i f a 41° = 3 i 'le' :ligi 2"9 3 ` .1 6,31 t' °a= 1 S ' 24pg + 2udtt;iI i2 i ! r , ezi;4 °Qr 0.,e b i ly :gitla Y•E p ibPe1:142-ili S Q_ - dd•b ; 3:oy 7 !. =gih0 ili 3tih 1.5t ; y qp f 1 fi y 9 1,a �D2iyiEh6:41t1te1ry5e53i 'eSe��dYdYt' 9i1 l4E:�eeh�4el1ihY °1y °y�q�Y4 64 13 1911 4�,E 101/61/11 gllhf4 id& CatythErl . S�Y11Yli YQ 477 5 QW 5TATI5TIC5 a�i l ill .„- 0 W 7 z re LAI 0 co a u.J LLI -J F- 0) LL. w 0 2 u. co ci mLI-I Z F- 1- 0 Z W Lu 0 O Y2 O 1— WW 0 Li- 0 • co o 1 IJ , 1:; 1 a cm E c = 11 ;§ v b }crs o� ra ¢z_ L c A E m E N C EEO S g' o ilk I I . _ _ � g 9 R ., e In . s h J In a h s e . h 6 .1 e In e h o . o In e h 1/ 111.1 ■ 4111 111 q hI31 ii , memo wYwM µ1d SOY .NCI flV. m em. Pnfl 3 1 3 g 9 R ., e In . s h J In a h s e . h 6 .1 e In e h o . o In e h 1/ 111.1 ■ 4111 111 q hI31 ii , memo wYwM µ1d SOY .NCI flV. m em. Pnfl RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 071998 "ERMIT CENTER • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED NOVEMBER 5,1998 HEARING DATE: November 12, 1998 NOTIFICATION: On September 22, 1998 staff mailed Notice of Application to surrounding properties. Notice of Hearing was posted and mailed to surrounding properties on October 29, 1998. Notice of Hearing sent to Seattle Times for publication on October 29, 1998. FILE NUMBER: L98 -0045 - Design Review APPLICANT: Harley Davidson OWNERS: Russell Tom REQUESTS: Design Review approval of a 34,000 square foot, two -story retail/warehouse building ASSOCIATED PERMITS: Development Permit LOCATION: 13001 - 48th Ave S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) ZONE DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS STAFF: Michael Jenkins ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A A. Site Plan B. Building Elevations C. SEPA Determination, with checklist and Staff Memorandum D. Landscape Plan E. Colorboard (presented at hearing) F. Applicant responses to Design Review criteria 981eAT.'Iri 47,41h .te•!'o /fin t 00 • '"' 4? ? ?f. 7!) • C.1:. /'In%) tii 4;2441c!0f8'+.'?A • Staff Report to the L98 -0045 Planning Commission FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. The applicant is requesting approval for a 34,000 square foot, two -story retail / warehouse building. Existing_Developmenti The site currently occupied by the shell of the abandoned Washington Pottery Works building. Surro ding Land Uses The surrounding properties include warehouse, commercial and distribution uses. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Attachment A is the site plan for the project. The building is sited on the parcel in its original location, allowing for a 25 foot curbcut access from 48th Ave S. and maintaining an existing 20 foot access for service vehicles along the east property line. The minimum landscape and setback requirements for uses in this zone have been met. Landscaping is provided along the front and side property lines and on parking islands to screen parking and access areas. The proposal includes pedestrian access from 48th Ave S. Walkways are provided along the west side of the building, connecting to the street access and adjacent to the parking lot. The project includes 66 parking spaces. Motorcycle parking will be located along the north portion of the site, adjacent to the garage access. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character; d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. 1 : ...._ Staff Report to the L98 -0045 Planning Comnvssion Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. Attachment B are building elevations. At 29 feet, the building meets the 45 foot height limit in this zone. Landscaping is provided on all property lines. The loading and access areas located on the north and east property lines are separate from the parking and pedestrian oriented areas. As indicated in Attachment A, the site will have pedestrian access to the main entrance from the existing sidewalk. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided Attachment D is the landscape plan. The landscape plan includes the following elements: • 12% open space • Columnar Trees (European Hornbeam) along front property line and Shade Trees (Red Sunset Maple) along side and rear property lines and in parking lot islands • Understory shrubbery along property lines, beneath trees and adjacent to public entrances • A variety of ground covers • A CMU enclosure to screen garbage /recycling area • A bioswale along the front yard The lighting plan for the site is also included in the landscape plan. The lighting includes single and double lamp 20 foot light poles in the landscape parking islands. No lighting has been indicated for accenting the building or for areas along the east or north property lines. 3 Staff Report to the L98 -0045 Planning Commission Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. 4. Building Design. a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; Z b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring = I- developments; w c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good aa proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be 0 consistent with anticipated life of the structure; 0 • p d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; u) w e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be -1 H screened from view; u) u- f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all u) O exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; g D g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, u_ ¢ form and siting should be used to provide visual interest u) d =W H As referenced, Attachment B are the building elevations and Attachment E is the color / ? ►_- material board. The applicant will modify an existing building shell through application z LIJ o of additional materials. The mass of the facade is broken through application of a seven g D (7) foot high CMU base. The CMU base is predominately split -face materials with a v single course of smooth face block. The CMU is also capped by a single course of glass o P block. The color of the CMU base is identified by the applicant as "natural". The = ui, remaining portion of the facade and the roof are Standing Seam Metal. The facade and I- the roof / trim colors have been identified by the applicant as "almond" and "desert sand ". Li. . z th U ci) The building has windows and doors at various heights and levels, based upon the • F corresponding internal use. Windows are primarily located on the southwest corner of z the building and along the west facade, both of which are near the entrances to the building. No windows are located along the east property line, as the interior portions of the building along the east facade are used for warehousing. The entrance and windows ' are marked by use of a metal canopy. Mechanical units for the building will be located behind a parapet over the west portion of the building. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale; b. Lighting in connection. with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. The trash/recycling area is located on the rear of the site and is constructed of CMU to match the building and will include a security gate with slats for screening. The required bicycle parking is adjacent to the front walkway. No freestanding signage has been indicated. The wall sign indicated on the elevations appears consistent with the Sign Code (TMC 19) but will be reviewed under a separate permit. 4 Staff Report to the L98 -0045 Planning Commission Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. CONCLUSIONS The Board of Architectural Review, pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.108.040, hereby makes the following findings and conclusions under the city's Design Review Criteria (TMC 18.60.050). w DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA: o co al (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. LL The building is appropriately sited on the parcel. Parking areas are clearly delineated in relation g to on -site circulation and the building. On -site pedestrian access will be available in all g a appropriate areas of the site. There is a clear walkway between the street and the site. Parking w and landscape requirements have been met. Z= (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. z o LLI w The building is within the 45 foot height limit in this zone. The building materials are appropriately used. The proposed landscaping helps to delineate space and provide barriers o �, between adjacent properties. The required loading space is included. w w (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment. t'-- Z ui The plan includes extensive and varied landscaping. The lighting plan does not show lighting on P the east and north property line, to provide adequate on -site safety and security. No pedestrian or z architectural lighting is indicated, which will provide safe access and visual interest. (4) Building Design. The use of materials in the design of the building provides both visual interest and relief from massing. The height and scale of the building is similar to other commercial and industrial buildings in the area. The use of materials and color provides visual and physical separation of the base, body and roof. The use of only one course of smooth face CMU block is not adequate given the height, bulk and length of the base. The two painted colors on the roof and facade provide visual separation and distinction for the building. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. The garbage / recycling area are appropriate in its use of building materials similar to the main building. 5 Staff Report to the L98.0045 Planning Conunission Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Design Review permit with four conditions: 1. The applicant shall revise the lighting plan reflected in the landscape plan to include both building mount and pole lighting on the north and east property line, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall provide pedestrian- oriented lighting along all sidewalks, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall provide ground mounted lighting directed to the facade on all sides of the building, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall include a minimum of three courses of smooth face CMU block within the proposed 7 foot CMU building base. The smooth face course shall be of similar coloration as the ground face block and shall be a minimum of one foot in width. • 6 Z JU O 0 J 1 1- N LL, w0. a. =• a w z� 1— 0' z 1- w o L- 2 • V. O Ii.I SP_ . 0 I- z File: q g- 00`� L 35mm Drawing# -CITY OF TUKWILA - DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: REMODEL EXISTING 16.000 SO FT BUILDING TO CREATE A 34.000 SO FT RETAIL STORE PROPONENT: DBM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOCATION OF PROPOSAL. INCLUDING 'STREET ADDRESS. IF ANY: ADDRESS: 13001 48 AV S PARCEL NO: 000300 -0046 SEC /TWN(RNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TLIKWILA FILE NO: E98 -0021 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.0.J0(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental . checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This intormation is available to the public on request. •k•k * *•k *: * * *•k•k•k•.i•; **: lk**' kkk*• k***.***** ******** ,•k•k **.Jc** **** * * * * * **** *•k *:Q * *4e.:Q ** This determination is final and signed this'!`! day of QC�ic� 1992. =Z mow: 6 U 00. W =' J I- LL wO. u.¢: co a w. z i, t- 0 Z F— ps o ■•• W I— V, LL III Z O Steve Lancaster. Responsible: Official City of Tukwila, (206):431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. WA 93188 Copies-of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Departreht of Community-Development. ATTACHMENT C City of Tukwila Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins Date: October 27, 1998 Re: E98 -0021, Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48 Av S. Project Description: John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This SEPA review is for the construction of a 34,000 square foot Harley Davidson retail store. The project will include substantial remodeling of an 16,000 square foot existing building, previously used by the Washington Pottery Works. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Site is relatively flat. Some cut and fill will be required for expansion of existing building, parking area and landscaping. Erosion control will occur during clearing of site and building construction to include a siltation pond, fabric fencing, hay bales and hydro- seeding. A Land Altering Permit for movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards is required. 88% of the site will include impervious surfaces. • Air Dust will be generated during construction, with watering to control dust. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 , E98 -0021 - Harley Davidson 13001 - 48 Ave. S. October 27, 1998 • Water Green River is located approximately 700 feet from site. Surface water runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected and treated on -site prior to discharge to off -site system. The storm drainage system must comply with the city's storm water management ordinance and the King County Surface Water Design Manual. A bioswale along part of the front yard will be, included, as well as a surface /sub - surface stormwater collection system. An off -site analysis including upstream and downstream drainage with retention analysis has been submitted. • Plants No vegetation on site. • Animals No impact. • Energy/Natural Resources Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to heat proposed structure. The structure must comply with the Washington State Energy Code. • Environmental Health No known environmental hazards Noise will be generated both during construction period and from traffic after project is completed. Construction activities must comply with Tukwila's Noise Ordinance (TMC 8.22). • Land/Shoreline Use The property is,currently occupied by the shell of the Washington Pottery building. Adjacent uses are a mix of commercial, light industrial and distribution/warehousing. The property is located in the Commercial/Light Industrial zone. Removal of substantial portions of the building, as indicated in the applicant's plans, would require a Demolition Permit. Approval by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), per TMC 18.60, is required prior to filing of a Development Permit. • Housing No impact. . E98 -0021 - Harley Davidson 13001 - 48 Ave. S. October 27, 1998 • Aesthetics Theheight of the building at the apex of the roof is 29 feet, 8 inches, which will not be altered by the remodeling of this structure. The predominate building materials include standing seam metal walls and roof, Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) and glass brick. As referenced, BAR approval is required. • Light and Glare A lighting plan will be submitted with the landscape plan, for approval by the BAR. Pedestrian, parking and architectural enhancement lighting will be included. Shields and/or reflectors will be uses on parking lot standards to avoid off -site impacts. • Recreation No impact. • Historic /Cultural Preservation No impact. • Transportation 66 parking spaces will be created as a result of this project. An existing drive at the east side of the property will remain, to be used for service vehicles only. A 10 foot easement along the front property line and 15 foot easement along the east property line will be recorded to facilitate future right -of -way. Approximately 300 trips per day will be generated a result of this project. A traffic study is required. The project must comply with the City's traffic concurrency ordinance (TMC 9.48). • Public Services The facility may require fire and police protection as well as emergency services. • Utilities The site is served by the City of Tukwila Sewer and Water utilities. Electric, gas and telephone services will be secured Recommendation: DNS z w cc oo W =' J F- u- W o. ga = d. �w zF.- � o z �- w 0 o- 0 1-- W to • z' pz o z 1 1 1 CHECKLIST NO: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Downtown Harley- Davidson 2. Name of Applicant: Fiorillo Northwest Inc. 3. Mailing address, phone number of applicant and contact person: Brett Jacobsen Fiorillo Northwest Inc P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166 -0826 (206) 241 -2600 4. Date checklist prepared: August 18, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The anticipated timing of the project is to begin construction October 1, 1998 and complete construction by March 31, 1999. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No previous environmental information has been prepared on this project that would affect this proposal to ow- knowledge. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. We are not aware of any other government approvals or proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal. \data \w o rd\e ca p p. d o c Page 2 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit, mechanical permit, rack storage, design review, sign permits, utility permit, building expansion and miscellaneous permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist.that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information or project description). The site is approximately 1.7 acres in size, according to the King County Assessor's Office. A copy of the King County assessor's map showing the property configuration and dimensions is attached for reference. This property is zoned as C/LI (commercial /light industrial). Currently a vacant 16,000 square foot steel - framed warehouse building exists on the site. The proposal includes remodeling this existing building and adding up to 25,000 square feet of expansion. The finished building will be a Harley- Davidson retail and service store including storage and office space. Part of the proposal also includes paving the existing yard /parking lot. Landscaping will be done in accordance with City codes. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site for the proposed project is located at 13001 48th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located in section 14 and 15, township 23N, and range 4 east. Enclosed with this checklist are a legal description, site plan, assessor's map, vicinity map, and topographic map. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. \data \word\eca pp.doc Page 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountains, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 15 %. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Please see the attached SCS soils type maps for this project. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is anticipated that only minor cuts and fills will be required to provide subgrades for pavement. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Erosion could occur during clearing and construction. During construction, a substantial amount of the site will be exposed, and vegetation will be removed. During construction activity, siltation could occur due to the construction activities themselves as well as the presence of heavy machinery on the site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 88% of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction. \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to earth are as follows: 1. Design and have approved a temporary erosion control plan by the local agency. 2. Implementation of best management practices in the field during construction. 3. Follow up during construction activities to provide additional temporary erosion control measures as necessary and as required by the local agency. 4. Specifically, the following measures will be implemented during construction on this project: construction of a siltation pond to remove sediment from stormwater run -off on the site, the construction of Marafi filter fabric fences to ensure that silt -laden water does not escape onto adjacent properties and cause damage, the construction and use of ditches and rock -check dams to attenuate the velocity of stormwater on the project, the use of hay bales to provide additional filtering systems as necessary, the construction of rock entrances to remove soil from construction machinery wheels prior to exiting the site, utilizing mulch and /or hydro - seeding to stabilize the site during wet weather conditions, and other temporary erosion controls as deemed necessary by the inspector in the field during construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Dust and diesel emissions from the construction machinery would result during construction.. Once the project is completed, no significant emissions would result from the proposal. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. \data \word\ecapp.doc Page 5 • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Standard measures to reduce or control emissions during construction are as follows: 1. Regular use of watering vehicles to attenuate dust particles on the site during construction. 2. Proper maintenance of all vehicles to limit diesel emissions during. construction. 3. Water a. Surface: \data \word \ecapp.doc 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, Takes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe ' type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream and river it flows into. The Green River is located approximately 700 feet north of the site. Will the project require. any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general, description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Not to our knowledge. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain. If so, note location on the site plan.. No. Page 6 a CLw J0 00 coo ` J = U) w. wO u_¢ = d. �w z= z o. 2 Lu 003 03 O 0 I- 111 w, � -o WZ 0' z li 1 • IE • 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, not to our knowledge. z. Ground: z' 2 -JU 00 (.0 W J 2. I-- • u_ w 0 Qu. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, � containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the ? general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of z o houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the = LLI o system(s) are expected to serve. o • I ww ▪ 0 w z. U - O ' 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. None. All sewage facilities on the site will be connected to the existing City of Tukwila sanitary sewer system. Therefore, there will be no discharge from septic tanks or other sources into the ground water. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater): Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) the method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this flow into other waters? If so, describe. Unlike the present stormwater system for the property, stormwater runoff for this project will be collected and treated into stormwater filtering systems as required by the City of Tukwila. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Stormwater mitigation measures will include the following: \data \word \eca p p. doc Page 7 1. Construction of a surface or sub - surface stormwater collection system. 2. Biofiltration and /or water quality will also be provided in addition to the above in accordance with local agency requirements. 4. Plants z W a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: r4 L deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other -J o. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other . co ° shrubs ' cnw � '- pasture (nu- wo crop or grain 2 wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other g water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. LL a co other types of vegetation I 0 Z b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? z I- LL! w There is no existing vegetation located on the 1.7 -acre property. Landscaping, v o however, will be provided in and around the project in accordance with City ,p �, codes and requirements. 0 ww H U c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. LL- p iwz None are known to be present on or near the site. P _; oI- Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or z enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Proposed landscaping provided at the time of the ultimate development of the property will be designed, approved, and constructed per City /County codes and requirements. This will require the use of landscape and /or buffer areas around the perimeter of the property, as well as internal landscaping and buffering, which is also required by agency code. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Pigeons Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA Page 8 \data \word \eca pp.doc OCT 07 1998 PERMIT CENTER G b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. ~ w d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. cn o. III z None are proposed. U. w • 6. Energy and Natural Resources w�. a. What kind of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood, stove, solar) will be used to a meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for z heating, manufacturing, etc. z o zr w Electric and natural gas energy will be utilized to serve the finished project. 0 U 0 � b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? E.) o� If so, generally describe. w w' 1— U LI 0. U2 c. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this z proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. All buildings will be constructed utilizing the Washington State Energy Code and will incorporate energy conserving features. Not to our knowledge. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazard waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. 1 Describe speoial emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services that might be required on the project would primarily be required during construction, due to specialized construction kiata \word\eca pp.doc Page 9 r activities on the project. Special medic services, etc. may be required by local emergency medical providers in order to address the medical needs of workers during construction. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. b. Noise None are proposed. 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for 111 example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None to our knowledge. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise generated from the project would occur during the construction phases of the project, and primarily be limited to the use of construction vehicles and construction activity on the site. After construction, the noise levels on the project would be those generally associated with activities as allowed on this property. These would likely be noises associated with vehicles entering and exiting parking areas, pedestrian traffic, and general activities of people during normal hours of operation. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. No specific measures are proposed. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1. North of the site: Semi- truck/trailer storage area. 2. East of the site: Motel and restaurant 3. South of the site: Commercial trucking business facility. \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 10 z Iw O 0 wi F. U)u. u O LL Q, • a I- w z w o' uj U O O N 0 H. w w Li. 8 ui 0 z 4. West of the site: Truck storage yard. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No, not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing vacant warehouse steel - framed building to the eastern side of the site. The existing building covers a total of 16,000 square feet. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial /light industrial (C/LI) as classified in the City of Tukwila Zoning Code. f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? incorporated City. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N /A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 35 people would reside or work in the completed project. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None to our knowledge. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed. \data\word\ecapp.doc Page 1 I z • w 0 00 CO w= JF— w; w N LLa CD: a. 1 w. z1._ w• o U� co 0 w L• t./3 w 0 ow _co 0 0 z 1 M M ■ I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. This project meets or satisfies and is compatible with all of the known existing and projected land uses in the area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N /A. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None are proposed. 10. Aesthetics 111 a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of any structure, not including antennas, on the proposed project would be that as allowed under the current City zoning code for the zoning on this site. ■ What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. All applicable local, state, and federal codes will be adhered to in the design of the project. This will ensure aesthetic compatibility with the surrounding community. \data \word \eca pp. doc Page 12 z 1Z w; 6 0 0' 0: W CO w0 u.= =W _ z� 1- 0 Z t— U-1 LU U0 0 L- W uj S EL" O cu. z.. --- _... O F-- z �u r� 11. Light and Glare a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare will be produced by the completed project in the form of: 1. Light produced from normal activities associated with the type of project proposed. 2. Parking lot lighting as necessary for safety reasons. b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Light in parking lots will be directed down through the use of reflectors. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to our knowledge. Proposed measures to reduce or control Tight and glare impacts, if any? Shields and /or reflectors will be used on all parking lot lighting standards in order to direct light and glare downward to ensure stray light does not affect adjacent property owners adversely. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course is to the southeast of the site, a community center park is located to the southwest of the site, and Southgate Park is located to the south of the site. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. This proposal will not create an impact on recreational facilities. \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 13 • 1 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None exist to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached site plan for, specific traffic routing in, through, and. around the project. b. Is site currently serviced in public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, three buses service this particular area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How. many would the project eliminate? The completed project would consist of approximately 70 parking spaces. The project would not eliminate any parking spaces. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. \data \word\ecapp.doc Page 14 z z 04 w. 6 J0 000 W= w0 g a. Z �. o' Z 0 0 f- IW W` 0. wZ U= 0 I. z e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. The completed project will generate approximately 300 trips per day. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m., Saturday 10:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m., therefore, there will be no a.m. peak hour trips generated by this proposal. The project will generate approximately 13 p.m. peak hour trips. Peak volumes will occur on Saturday. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, the project would result in the increased need for public services including fire protection, police protection, health care, etc. The increase in these services would be those normally associated with the proposed uses. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The direct financial impacts on public services will be addressed via the increase in tax rates and the collection of additional tax revenue for the local agencies upon development of this property. This will include additional funds which will be generated for additional fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, etc 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: \data \word \eca pp. doc Page 15 • b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. WATER: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 SEWER: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 ELECTRICITY: Puget Sound Energy 805 156th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (888) 225 -5773 TELEPHONE: U.S. West Communications 14422 SE 2606 Kent, WA 98032 (800) 603 -6000 REFUSE SERVICE Waste Management- Rainier 6350 South 143'd Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 243 -4050 \data \word \ecapp.doc �. ,' • : Page 16 w 6 U 0 t 1)W W =: J • u. w 0', g a` Z Vf_ w z� � 0 Z �- 0' 10 • 0), 1-1 w W HU! ui z 0 M tr M k • s t C. SIGNATURE I hereby state that I am the owner or authorized agent listed above, and certify that all information contained above and in exhibits attached hereto are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the processing of this application may require additional supporting material upon request to City staff. RIGHT OF ENTRY: By signing this application the applicant grants unto the City and it's agents the right to enter upon the premises for purpose of conducting all necessary inspection to determine compliance with applicable laws, codes, and regulations. This right of entry shall continue until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the property. Signature of Property Owner: / of L Signature of Agent: Date: /, y Signature of Applica t: Date: Y o R 9838c.008 klata\word\eca pp.doc • ' Page 17 z �z 6 0 0 w W I I- w0: g a. co =a w z �. zoo U 0 r uJ 0 o .z. w --- o� z. CITY OF TIJKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: REMODEL EXISTING 16.000 SO FT BUILDING TO CREATE A 34,000 'SO FT RETAIL STORE PROPONENT: DBM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 13001 48 AV S PARCEL NO: 000300 -0046 SEC!TWN/ RNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TLIKWILA FILE NO: E98-0021 The, City, has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EI'S) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made afters review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *k *****k* * ** **.k•kk:4:Q ******** ****k•k`k** ******* **k::'(:44•k *44(4. *k: *****:lc•k*:4:4* .k **:M *:4* This determination is final and signed this 2.c.)__ day of Q 1992. Steve Lancaster. Responsible Official City of Tukwila, '(206) 431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 93183 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. • ATTACHMENT C F-w: ul�: U U O: • W W O. C Q. � a HW. I- F- o w 0 D. �O H uiz U u, 1 =t o 1-:. z File: 35mm Drawing# City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins Date: October 27, 1998 Re: E98 -0021, Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48 Av S. Project Description: This SEPA review is for the construction of a 34,000 square foot Harley Davidson retail store. The project will include substantial remodeling of an 16,000 square foot existing building, previously used by the Washington Pottery Works. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Site is relatively flat. Some cut and fill will be required for expansion of existing building, parking area and landscaping. Erosion control will occur during clearing of site and building construction to include a siltation pond, fabric fencing, hay bales and hydro- seeding. A Land Altering Permit for movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards is required. 88% of the site will include impervious surfaces. • Air Dust will be generated during construction, with watering to control dust. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 I• E98 -0021 - Harley Davidson 13001 - 48 Ave. S. October 27, 1998 • Water Green River is located approximately 700 feet from site. Surface water runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected and treated on -site prior to discharge to off -site system. The storm drainage system must comply with the city's storm water management ordinance and the King County Surface Water Design Manual. A bioswale along part of the front yard will be,included, as well as a surface /sub - surface stormwater collection system. An off -site analysis including upstream and downstream drainage with retention analysis has been submitted. z t=- w 00 CO w= cn u-' w 0 • Plants g No vegetation on site. = w z� • Animals z 1—: w w No impact. n 0' 0Q • Energy/Natural Resources Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to heat proposed structure. The structure must comply with the Washington State Energy Code. • Environmental Health No known environmental hazards. Noise will be generated both during construction period and from traffic after project is completed. Construction activities must comply with Tukwila's Noise Ordinance (TMC 8.22). • Land/Shoreline Use The property is currently occupied by the shell of the Washington Pottery building. Adjacent uses are a mix of commercial, light industrial and distribution/warehousing. The property is located in the Commercial/Light Industrial zone. Removal of substantial portions of the building, as indicated in the applicant's plans, would require a Demolition Permit. Approval by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), per TMC 18.60, is required prior to filing of a Development Permit. • Housing No impact. ww 1- u. 0 .z w Uco 0 O z E98 -0021 - Harley Davidson 13001 - 48 Ave. S. October 27, 1998 • Aesthetics The height of the building at the apex of the roof is 29 feet, 8 inches, which will not be altered by the remodeling of this structure. The predominate building materials include standing seam metal walls and roof, Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) and glass brick. As referenced, BAR approval is required. 1 z ft LAI JU 0 s U 0, W =' • Light and Glare 2w O A lighting plan will be submitted with the landscape plan, for approval by the BAR. 2 Pedestrian, parking and architectural enhancement lighting will be included. Shields u. and/or reflectors will be uses on parking lot standards to avoid off -site impacts. z= I— O Z no' o 1- w w. - U. .. z. w OH 66 parking spaces will be created as a result of this project. An existing drive at the z east side of the property will remain, to be used for service vehicles only. A 10 foot easement along the front property line and 15 foot easement along the east property line will be recorded to facilitate future right -of -way. Approximately 300 trips per day will be generated a result of this project. A traffic study is required. The project must comply with the City's traffic concurrency ordinance (TMC 9.48). • Recreation No impact. • Historic /Cultural Preservation No impact. • Transportation • Public Services The facility may require fire and police protection as well as emergency services. • Utilities The site is served by the City of Tukwila Sewer and Water utilities. Electric, gas and telephone services will be secured Recommendation: DNS ... *+ r r r. 1 1 1 1 CHECKLIST NO: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Downtown Harley- Davidson 2. Name of Applicant: Fiorillo Northwest Inc. 3. Mailing address, phone number of applicant and contact person: Brett Jacobsen Fiorillo Northwest Inc P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166 -0826 (206) 241 -2600 4. Date checklist prepared: August 18, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The anticipated timing of the project is to begin construction October 1, 1998 and complete construction by March 31, 1999. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No previous environmental information has been prepared on this project that would affect this proposal to our knowledge. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. We are not aware of any other government approvals or proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal. \data \wo rd\ecapp.doc Page 2 z • I'w. �¢g J O, 00 CO o. UJ . w0 • J. ?. ci)a �w zo w o • L-.1 �. w W. U • • w H • z. r r 1 r 1 1 1 1 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit, mechanical permit, rack storage, design review, sign permits, utility permit, building expansion and miscellaneous permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist.that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information or project description). The site is approximately 1.7 acres in size, according to the King County Assessor's Office. A copy of the King County assessor's map showing the property configuration and dimensions is attached for reference. This property is zoned as C /LI (commercial /light industrial). Currently a vacant 16,000 square foot steel - framed warehouse building exists on the site. The proposal includes remodeling this existing building and adding up to 25,000 square feet of expansion. The finished building will be a Harley- Davidson retail and service store including storage and office space. Part of the proposal also includes paving the existing yard /parking lot. Landscaping will be done in accordance with City codes. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site for the proposed project is located at 13001 48`x' Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located in section 14 and 15, township 23N, and range 4 east. Enclosed with this checklist are a legal description, site plan, assessor's map, vicinity map, and topographic map. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 3 ■ It B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountains, other: W b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? , � z The steepest slope on the site is approximately 15 %. (o o O cn w J X; c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, u' �- peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and uj 0 note any prime farmland. Q' N= d Please see the attached SCS soils type maps for this project. w z� d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? z o 71 If so, describe. Lij 7o O co 0 - 0I w• w z; w U - P _. o - z No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is anticipated that only minor cuts and fills will be required to provide subgrades for pavement. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Erosion could occur during clearing and construction. During construction, a substantial amount of the site will be exposed, and vegetation will be removed. During construction activity, siltation could occur due to the construction activities themselves as well as the presence of heavy machinery on the site. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 88% of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction. \data \wo rd\ecapp.doc . Page 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 1 2. Air Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to earth are as follows: 1. Design and have approved a temporary erosion control plan by the local agency. 2. Implementation of best management practices in the field during construction. 3. Follow up during construction activities to provide additional temporary erosion control measures as necessary and as required by the local agency. 4. Specifically, the following measures will be implemented during construction on this project: construction of a siltation pond to remove sediment from stormwater run -off on the site, the construction of Marafi filter fabric fences to ensure that silt -laden water does not escape onto adjacent properties and cause damage, the construction and use of ditches and rock -check dams to attenuate the velocity of stormwater on the project, the use of hay bales to provide additional filtering systems as necessary, the construction of rock entrances to remove soil from construction machinery wheels prior to exiting the site, utilizing mulch and /or hydro- seeding to stabilize the site during wet weather conditions, and other temporary erosion controls as deemed necessary by the inspector in the field during construction. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the IF project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. It { Dust and diesel emissions from the construction machinery would result during 1 construction. Once the project is completed, no significant emissions would result from the proposal. I 1 1 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 5 ori 1 i 1 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Standard measures to reduce or control emissions during construction are as follows: 1. Regular use of watering vehicles to attenuate dust particles on the site during construction. 2. Proper maintenance of all vehicles to limit diesel emissions during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: \data \word\eca pp.doc 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream and river it flows into. The Green River is located approximately 700 feet north of the site. Will the project require, any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Not to our knowledge. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain. If so, note location on the site plan. No. Page 6 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, not to our knowledge. z Ground: _ Z. cc "-' 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground 6 o. water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if co 0 J Z known. 1.- co LL.' No. w O 2 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, = a containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the Z general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the z F- system(s) are expected to serve. 2 o' 0— None. All sewage facilities on the site will be connected to the existing o City of Tukwila sanitary sewer system. Therefore, there will be no = o discharge from septic tanks or other sources into the ground water. o wz U -. 0 1 1. Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) the method of z collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this flow into other waters? If so, describe. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater): Unlike the present stormwater system for the property, stormwater runoff for this project will be collected and treated into stormwater filtering systems as required by the City of Tukwila. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Stormwater mitigation measures will include the following: \data \word \ecapp.doc • Page 7 1. Construction of a surface or sub - surface stormwater collection system. 2. Biofiltration and /or water quality will also be provided in addition to the above in accordance with local agency requirements. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There is no existing vegetation located on the 1.7 -acre property. Landscaping, however, will be provided in and around the project in accordance with City codes and requirements. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to be present on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Proposed landscaping provided at the time of the ultimate development of the property will be designed, approved, and constructed per City /County codes and requirements. This will require the use of landscape and /or buffer areas around the perimeter of the property, as well as internal landscaping and buffering, which is also required by agency code. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Pigeons Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: \data \word \eca pp.doc RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 0 7 1998 PERMIT CENTER Page 8 i r b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None are proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kind of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood, stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas energy will be utilized to serve the finished project. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. c. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. All buildings will be constructed utilizing the Washington State Energy Code and will incorporate energy conserving features. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazard waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services that might be required on the project would primarily be required during construction, due to specialized construction \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 9 z re w 6 U o tWI 1— U) Li. w0 ga =• a w z� �o z1- w U co • U: w W. LL �I — o. w z U N 0 ri activities on the project. Special medic services, etc. may be required by local emergency medical providers in order to address the medical needs of workers during construction. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if zz any. = F re None are proposed. aa J V 0 b. Noise , N o w= 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for w 0. example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? u. ::i ° None to our knowledge. D _a w. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the ? project on a short-term or Tong -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, z o'. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 2 ILI D U 0 Noise generated from the project would occur rl ►,rina #Ii construction O -. w phases of the project, and primarily be limited to the use of construction w vehicles and construction activity on the site. v After construction, the noise levels on the project would be those generally El associated with activities as allowed on this property. These would likely be noises associated with vehicles entering and exitin g parking areas Z areas, z pedestrian traffic, and general activities of people during normal hours of operation. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. No specific measures are proposed. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1. North of the site: Semi - truck/trailer storage area. 2. East of the site: Motel and restaurant. 3. South of the site: Commercial trucking business facility. \data\word\ecapp.doc - • Page 10 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4. West of the site: Truck storage yard. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No, not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing vacant warehouse steel - framed building to the eastern side of the site. The existing building covers a total of 76,000 square feet. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial /light industrial (CAI) as classified in the City of Tukwila Zoning Code. f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Incorporated City. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N /A. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 35 people would reside or work in the completed project. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None to our knowledge. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed. \data \word \eca pp.doc ' �: Page I l z _ H' w 00 . No • W Z J H' .cn u. WO �Q rn� = a. z= z0 O ❑ I- WW 7Z 0 u. z. 0 E12. Off. z ■ ■ ■ A way (. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. This project meets or satisfies and is compatible with all of the known existing and projected land uses in the area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N /A. N o w b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether g high, middle or low- income housing. I-w z= 1- O z 1- U Ca 'O U ww 1— o z a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what o iu is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? o 1- None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None are proposed. 10. Aesthetics The tallest height of any structure, not including antennas, on the proposed project would be that as allowed under the current City zoning code for the zoning on this site. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. All applicable local, state, and federal codes will be adhered to in the design of the project. This will ensure aesthetic compatibility with the surrounding community. \data \word \eca pp.doc Page 12 n Nil �a 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare will be produced by the completed project in the form of: 1. Light produced from normal activities associated with the type of project proposed. 2. Parking lot lighting as necessary for safety reasons. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Light in parking lots will be directed down through the use of reflectors. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? Shields and /or reflectors will be used on all parking lot lighting standards in order to direct light and glare downward to ensure stray light does not affect adjacent property owners adversely. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course is to the southeast of the site, a community center park is located to the southwest of the site, and Southgate Park is located to the south of the site. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. This proposal will not create an impact on recreational facilities. \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 13 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. If b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None exist to our knowledge. �►! c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Y None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached site plan for specific traffic routing in, through, and. around the project. b. Is site currently serviced in public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, three buses service this particular area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project would consist of approximately 70 parking spaces. The project would not eliminate any parking spaces. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. \data \word\ecapp.doc Page 14 z F=-Z re w U O: U) o W2. w 0. 2 u_ j. I a w F-_ z0 11.1 ul M 0 0 1- Ill ELI u.i z' ti cA z 41 0-1; e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. The completed project will generate approximately 300 trips per day. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m., Saturday 10:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m., therefore, there will be no a.m. peak hour trips generated by this proposal. The project will generate approximately 13 p.m. peak hour trips. Peak volumes will occur on Saturday. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, the project would result in the increased need for public services including fire protection, police protection, health care, etc. The increase in these services would be those normally associated with the proposed uses. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The direct financial impacts on public services will be addressed via the increase in tax rates and the collection of additional tax revenue for the local agencies upon development of this property. This will include additional funds which will be generated for additional fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, etc. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: \data \word \eca pp.doc Page 15 Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. WATER: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 SEWER: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 ELECTRICITY: Puget Sound Energy 805 156th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (888) 225 -5773 TELEPHONE: U.S. West Communications 14422 SE 260th Kent, WA 98032 (800) 603 -6000 REFUSE SERVICE: Waste Management- Rainier 6350 South 143rd Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 243 -4050 Page 16 'data \ward \ecapp.doc •� z rew 2 UO t CI W =; i— w 0: gQ I F. = w z zo U 0, '0 = 0 F—: ' S0 -0 _z U =, o /-s z 1 1 C. SIGNATURE I hereby state that I am the owner or authorized agent listed above, and certify that all information contained above and in exhibits attached hereto are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the processing of this application may require additional supporting material upon request to City staff. RIGHT OF ENTRY: By signing this application the applicant grants unto the City and it's agents the right to enter upon the premises for purpose of conducting all necessary inspection to determine compliance with applicable laws, codes, and regulations. This right of entry shall continue until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the property. , Signature of Property Owner: PP Date: 1 4f Signature of Agent: Date: /, Signature of Applica t: Date: 2.0 c 9838c.008 \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 17 z HW: 6 00 ` 0 u�iW J F- U.) LL, W0 QQ u. g2 = zw F- I- 0 w uj o 0 ;0 Wu U` o .z We FU-=' o 1-` z DOWNTOWN HARLEY DAVIDSON 13001- 48TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON APPLICANTS RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 i 1998 PERMIT CENTER A. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE 1. The site has been designed to create a desirable transition with the streetscape by providing a 10 foot wide planter along the road frontage planted with grass, shrubs, and street trees. Pedestrian movement will be provided internally on sidewalks. These internal sidewalks will connect to external sidewalks to be provided with the future 48th Street improvement project. 2. Views of the parking area adjacent to 48th Ave. will be screened from the street by the landscaping provided along the road frontage as well as with landscaping in the parking lot • planter islands. 3. The remodeled building will be well within height and scale in relation to the site. B. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE & SITE TO ADJOINING AREA 1. This remodeled facility will provide an upgraded look from the surrounding uses, but will possess similarities in texture, line and mass. 2. Although not required by code, landscaping will be provided along the southerly and westerly property lines except in that area adjacent to the building which will instead be used for traffic circulation purposes. 3. The remodeled building will provide a cohesive, but upscale and modern look relative to the surrounding industrial neighborhood. 4.. The building is designed to separate delivery vehicles from the customer vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Delivery vehicles will use the rear entrance to access the building, whereas all customer traffic will remain on the front parking lot area. 5. In order to facilitate on site circulation with the street circulation we have limited the property to two accesses. One access primarily for the customers on the front side of the building, and one access for service vehicles along the rear of the building. C. LANDSCAPE & SITE TREATMENT 1. There are no topographic features to the site, the site is flat. 2. The site's flat walks and parking area create a `user friendly" appearance. 1 ATTACHMENT F 3. The proposed landscaping will soften the industrial look of the building and screen views of the parking lot. 4. The layout of the facility is situated to avoid pedestrian and vehicular traffic across landscape areas. In planter areas adjacent to sidewalks hardy plant material will be used(please see landscape plan). 5. Trees will be used both adjacent to the building and in the parking lot islands(please see landscape plan). 6. There are no service yards on this property. 7. The site is presently fenced on all sides except that side adjacent to 48th Avenue. Fencing may be provided along the road frontage. 8. Lighting will be provided in parking lot areas through the use of light standards which are of compatible style and color in relation to the building. These light standards direct the light down toward the parking areas, thereby minimize off site impacts. Lighting will be provided from the building at loading/service entrances as well as customer entrances. Soft flood lighting may be incorporated along the front building facade to create visually aesthetic look during the evening hours. D. BUILDING DESIGN 1. The architectural style is industrial in nature and creates a cohesive appearance with buildings in the surrounding area. 2. The building scale is very much in keeping with the surround neighborhood, and will create a nice transition between the industrial and the restaurant/hotel uses in the vicinity. 3. All building components have been designed in proportion and in relation to one another. All building components have been designed with materials which insure a life expectancy equal to the steel structure of the building. 4. The base color of the building will be a galvanized metal gray with black and orange highlight accents(the Harley Davidson corporate colors). 5. All mechanical hardware will be placed behind the parapet walls located at the two "pop outs" at the front of the building 6. As mentioned previously, all light fixtures are designed to be complementary with the building design and colors. 2 ; 7. To avoid monotony in building design, we provided modulation along the building facade, and in those areas also provided a steel eve design for additional relief and character. E. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES & STREET FURNITURE 1. There are no miscellaneous structures or street furnishings on the project. 2. There are no miscellaneous structures or street furnishings on the project. _. City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing on I ► / ( Z , 1948 at 7:00 p.m. located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd., to discuss the following. CASE NUMBER: L RB • o©45 APPLICANT: 1-}- a.vicy /7av i el)u-t REQUEST: �.c �, � rt � p�v raw 4 p Na�.w' +0 u-e �� Ka bO,x0 1:l 'Lo t �o� t C e ..err LOCATION: ee( tietrA AG S CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: Personal wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File z =z' it ~w 6 JU 0 0 wi J 1.-' U) LL. w O; u? N C1 I- III Z= 1-O. Z I- LL! w 2 o • '` 2▪ U .. z. w U 2 O z City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director z ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION w PREPARED NOVEMBER 5,1998 6 O 0 CO 0 w i ORIGINAL HEARING DATE: November 12, 1998 HEARING DATE: June 22, 2000 NOTIFICATION: Notice of Public Hearing sent on June 8, 2000 to Parties of Record; legal notice published in Seattle Times on June 9, 2000 FILE NUMBER: L98 -0045 — Design Review APPLICANT: Harley Davidson OWNERS: Russell Tom REQUEST: Approval of Modification to South Building Facade ASSOCIATED PERMIT: Development Permit, D99 -0259 LOCATION: 13001 48th Avenue South COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI) ZONE DESIGNATION: Commercial /Light Industrial (C /LI) SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS STAFF: Carol Lumb ATTACHEMENTS: November 5, 1998 Staff Report with Attachments C and F and Notice of Decision dated November 13, 1998 B. Sheet A3, Exterior Elevations, revised June 9, 2000 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 cnu w g a. = a. �—_ z�, I--- 0 z f- ▪ LU U W o ww • 0 -0 .z. CU co O — O 1- z Staff Report to the Planning Commission FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description Addendum to L98 -0045 Harley Davidson The applicant is requesting approval of a revision to the approved building design for a window on the south facade of the building. The window was installed without review by DCD staff or the BAR. Existing Development The site is occupied by the newly redeveloped retail /warehouse for Harley Davidson. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding properties include motel, warehouse, commercial and truck distribution uses. Background The BAR/Planning Commission reviewed and approved the design of the Harley Davidson project on November 12, 1999. A copy of the original staff report and Notice of Decision on the project approval by the BAR is attached as Attachment A. When the redevelopment to the existing building took place, the applicant added a window to an office on the second floor of the south facade that was not part of the original building permit that was issued based on the BAR approved design. The applicant has posted a bond for $2,314 to cover the cost of changes to the south facade. The Director of the Department of Community Development is authorized to approve minor modifications to BAR approved projects. However, staff believes that the addition of the window, given its very visible location, is a major modification requiring Planning Commission review. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA This addendum to the original staff report will only address the criteria in TMC 18.60.050 B. 4., Commercial and Light Industrial Design Review Criteria, Building Design, specifically Section 4.c that relate to the proposed revision: Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure (emphasis added). 2 q: \carol \Downtown Harley Davidson\staffrpt.doc Staff Report to the Addendum to L98 -0045 Planning Commission Harley Davidson The addition of the window has an impact on the appearance of the south facade, which faces the public street. One window that is not centered in the wall creates a lop -sided visual appearance. The window doesn't relate to other features of the south wall, as there are no other features or design features nor is it proportional, but rather out of scale to the z rest of the wall. As the window was added after the building plans were drawn up, the location of internal space in relation to where windows could be inserted was not w CC 2 considered. Ideally, the window should be balanced with a second window equally spaced from the other side, however, due to the location of a bathroom and stairwell o where a second window of the same shape would be located, this is not practical. o J The addition of the window has a beneficial effect on the functioning of the interior � office space by providing natural lighting to the office. w 0 Great care has been taken with the appearance of other portions of the building and Q project site. For example, the applicant has installed additional landscaping, beyond that a required by the Tukwila landscaping code and the interior spaces use a mix of materials to create a very pleasing shopping environment. As a result, the insertion of the one ? �- window on the south facade is all the more incongruous to the overall appearance of the z o. building. LLI no If staff had had an opportunity to review the modification to the south facade, the 0 applicant would have been asked to design a window treatment that is balanced on the w south wall of the building. To remedy the unauthorized insertion of the window in the 1- v F- south facade, there are several options: a_0. .z • Add a window to balance the facade appearance, even though the window might need to be shaped differently given the constraints posed by the location of the stairwell 0 and bathroom; or • Continue the metal canopy theme across the south facade or provide some other facade treatment that balances the overall appearance of the south facade. • Remove the window and restore the facade to its approved design. CONCLUSIONS The Board of Architectural Review, pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18. 108.040, hereby makes the following findings and conclusions under the city's Design Review Criteria (TMC 18.60.050). 1. These findings and conclusions are an addendum to the original staff report and only address the criteria in TMC 18.60.050 B. 4.c., Commercial and Light Industrial Design Review Criteria, Building Design. The findings and conclusions of the staff report for L98 -0045 are hereby adopted by reference. q: \carol \Downtown Harley Davidson\staffrpt.doc 3 Staff Report to the Addendum to L98 -0045 Planning Commission Harley Davidson 2. A window was installed in an office on the second floor of the south facade without review or approval by the Department of Community Development or BAR. The window was not part of the plans reviewed and approved by the BAR on November 12, 1998 nor on the plans reviewed by DCD for issuance of the building permit. 3. A window is a building component that should have good proportions and relate to other building components, per TMC 18.60.050 B.4.c. The addition of the window is not proportional to the south facade of the building, as there are no other windows on that side of the building nor are there other building components that could balance the window. 4. The applicant has taken great care in the appearance of other portions of the new building, with additional landscaping beyond what the code requires planted to enhance the outer appearance of the site. 5. There are several options to remedy the unauthorized insertion of the window: add a window (not necessarily the same shape) to balance the facade appearance; continue the metal canopy theme across the south facade or add some other facade treatment to balance the window; or remove the window. 6. The addition of the window has a beneficial effect on the functioning of the interior office space by providing natural lighting to the office. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the approval of the modification of the design of the south facade of the Harley Davidson building with the following condition: 1. The applicant must submit a revised elevation for review and approval by the Director of the Department of Community Development that either adds a window to balance the existing window or proposes some other facade treatment to create a balanced relationship with the new window. q: \carol \Downtown Harley Davidson \staffrpt.doc 4 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION PREPARED NOVEMBER 5,1998 HEARING DATE: November 12, 1998 NOTIFICATION: On September 22, 1998 staff mailed Notice of Application to surrounding properties. Notice of Hearing was posted and mailed to surrounding properties on October 29, 1998. Notice of Hearing sent to Seattle Times for publication on October 29, 1998. FILE NUMBER: L98 -0045 - Design Review APPLICANT: Harley Davidson OWNERS: Russell Tom REQUESTS: Design Review approval of a 34,000 square foot, two -story retail/warehouse building ASSOCIATED PERMITS: Development Permit LOCATION: 13001 - 48th Ave S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) ZONE DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS STAFF: Michael Jenkins ATTACHMENTS: A. Site Plan B. Building Elevations C. SEPA Determination, with checklist and Staff Memorandum D. Landscape Plan E. Colorboard (presented at hearing) F. Applicant responses to Design Review criteria 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 Staff Report to the Planning Commission FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description L98 -0045 Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. z The applicant is requesting approval for a 34,000 square foot, two -story retail / 1- w warehouse building. QQ J U. 00 Existing Development 0 WI The site currently occupied by the shell of the abandoned Washington Pottery Works u) o building. 2 J Surrounding Land Uses co d The surrounding properties include warehouse, commercial and distribution uses. Z i H0 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA LL1 ?. U 0 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. 0 P 0 I- a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide = w for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; I- F-- b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual 0 impact of large paved areas; iti Z c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. U = 0 i—. Attachment A is the site plan for the project. The building is sited on the parcel in its z original location, allowing for a 25 foot curbcut access from 48th Ave S. and maintaining an existing 20 foot access for service vehicles along the east property line. The minimum landscape and setback requirements for uses in this zone have been met. Landscaping is provided along the front and side property lines and on parking islands to screen parking and access areas. The proposal includes pedestrian access from 48th Ave S. Walkways are provided along the west side of the building, connecting to the street access and adjacent to the parking lot. The project includes 66 parking spaces. Motorcycle parking will be located along the north portion of the site, adjacent to the garage access. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character; d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Staff Report to the L98 -0045 Planning Commission Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. Attachment B are building elevations. At 29 feet, the building meets the 45 foot height limit in this zone. Landscaping is provided on all property lines. The loading and access areas located on the north and east property lines are separate from the parking and pedestrian oriented areas. As indicated in Attachment A, the site will have pedestrian access to the main entrance from the existing sidewalk. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Attachment D is the landscape plan. The landscape plan includes the following elements: • 12% open space • Columnar Trees (European Hornbeam) along front property line and Shade Trees (Red Sunset Maple) along side and rear property lines and in parking lot islands • Understory shrubbery along property lines, beneath trees and adjacent to public entrances • A variety of ground covers • A CMU enclosure to screen garbage /recycling area • A bioswale along the front yard The lighting plan for the site is also included in the landscape plan. The lighting includes single and double lamp 20 foot light poles in the landscape parking islands. No lighting has been indicated for accenting the building or for areas along the east or north property lines. Staff Report to the L98 -0045 Planning Commission Harley Davidson -13001 48th Ave S. 4. Building Design. a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened front view; f Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. As referenced, Attachment B are the building elevations and Attachment E is the color / material board. The applicant will modify an existing building shell through application of additional materials. The mass of the facade is broken through application of a seven (7) foot high CMU base. The CMU base is predominately split -face materials with a single course of smooth face block. The CMU is also capped by a single course of glass block. The color of the CMU base is identified by the applicant as "natural ". The remaining portion of the facade and the roof are Standing Seam Metal. The facade and the roof / trim colors have been identified by the applicant as "almond" and "desert sand ". The building has windows and doors at various heights and levels, based upon the corresponding internal use. Windows are primarily located on the southwest corner of the building and along the west facade, both of which are near the entrances to the building. No windows are located along the east property line, as the interior portions of the building along the east facade are used for warehousing. The entrance and windows are marked by use of a metal canopy. Mechanical units for the building will be located behind a parapet over the west portion of the building. g. 5 a. b. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale; Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. The trash/recycling area is located on the rear of the site and is constructed of CMU to match the building and will include a security gate with slats for screening. The required bicycle parking is adjacent to the front walkway. No freestanding signage has been indicated. The wall sign indicated on the elevations appears consistent with the Sign Code (TMC 19) but will be reviewed under a separate permit. 4 Staff Report to the Planning Commission L98 -0045 Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. CONCLUSIONS The Board of Architectural Review, pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.108.040, hereby makes the following findings and conclusions under the city's Design Review Criteria (TMC 18.60.050). w ce DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA: 8 UO (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. w = (w The building is appropriately sited on the parcel. Parking areas are clearly delineated in relation w o to on -site circulation and the building. On -site pedestrian access will be available in all g appropriate areas of the site. There is a clear walkway between the street and the site. Parking and landscape requirements have been met. cJ w z. z� (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. E- O zF- ww The building is within the 45 foot height limit in this zone. The building materials are v 0 appropriately used. The proposed landscaping helps to delineate space and provide barriers O u2 . between adjacent properties. The required loading space is included. w w w 0 (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment. w O .z The plan includes extensive and varied landscaping. The lighting plan does not show lighting on 0� the east and north property line, to provide adequate on -site safety and security. No pedestrian or o architectural lighting is indicated, which will provide safe access and visual interest. (4) Building Design. The use of materials in the design of the building provides both visual interest and relief from massing. The height and scale of the building is similar to other commercial and industrial buildings in the area. The use of materials and color provides visual and physical separation of the base, body and roof. The use of only one course of smooth face CMU block is not adequate given the height, bulk and length of the base. The two painted colors on the roof and facade provide visual separation and distinction for the building. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. The garbage / recycling area are appropriate in its use of building materials similar to the main building. 5 Staff Repo to the Planning C mmission L98 -0045 Harley Davidson - 13001 48th Ave S. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff reco ends approval of the Design Review permit with four conditions: 1. e applicant shall revise the lighting plan reflected in the landscape plan to include both bu lding mount and pole lighting on the north and east property line, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. T e applicant shall provide pedestrian- oriented lighting along all sidewalks, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building pe it. 3. Th- applicant shall provide ground mounted lighting directed to the facade on all sides of th= building, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the iss ance of a building permit. 4. Th wi si applicant shall include a minimum of three courses of smooth face CMU block 'n the proposed 7 foot CMU building base. The smooth face course shall be of lar coloration as the ground face block and shall be a minimum of one foot in width. 6 To: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION November 13, 1998 • Harley Davidson (applicant) • Russell Tom (owner) • King County Assessor, Accounting Division • Parties of record (See Attached) John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170. At their November 12, 1998 public hearing, the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved the applicant's request for a 34,000 square foot retail /warehouse building. The BAR approved the Design Review application with the following conditions: z �w J U U0 U W = J I- wo 2 co = d. w z= ZO w 0 c J. The applicant shall revise the lighting plan reflected in the landscape plan to include both building mount and pole lighting on the north and east property line, to be approved by the w Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. — u. 0 wz 2. The applicant shall provide pedestrian - oriented lighting along all sidewalks, to be approved by the U— Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 0 ►_-,; O Z 3. The applicant shall provide ground mounted lighting directed to the facade on all sides of the building, to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall include a minimum of three courses of smooth face CMU block within the proposed 7 foot CMU building base. The smooth face course shall be of similar coloration as the ground face block and shall be a minimum of one foot in width. PROJECT BACKGROUND a. Project file number: L98 -0045 b. The name of the property owner(s): Russell Tom 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • FaY /WV ` November 13,1998 Notice of Decision L98 -0045 - Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48th Ave. S. c. Project Description: Textual description as well as 8.5" x 11" site plans, building elevations and other appropriate characteristics. Design Review approval of a 34,000 square foot retail/warehouse building, to include 66 parking spaces d. Project location: 13001- 48th Ave S. e. The permits submitted concurrently with this application: None f. Environmental threshold determination (if any): Determination of Non - Significance, issued October 28, 1998 Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. h. Administrative appeals for the various permit Types are discussed below. The period for administrative appeals is 14 days, starting from the issuance of this Notice of Decision. The administrative body hearing the appeal is the City Council. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials shall contain: 1. The name of the appealing party, 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party, and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to received notices on the appealing party's behalf, and 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit(s) are available for inspection at the Tukwila Dept. of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Blvd.; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. The project planner is Michael Jenkins, who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3685 for further information. November 13,1998 Notice of Decision L98-0045 - Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48th Ave. S. Parties of Record John McKenna Fiorello Northwest P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166-0826 t.. n.. P f tiik t.0 u u g' ...,.Q.. . .. u u u ▪ u u III .10 VP U u U u U u U U U Hllmn f z x CID a nu. tilt flit low ii d3 ; "` o�eiy n �i"a� p�eay 4f;;41'21 er? iN Yii ¢� 0 �b !'-� •g r Zen �• pQ zt4 p�6 C 4 0 p, d9 4 9 W D+ Tei u y6Y� €l'l'i�� r gF /i11 • IiI!{!IiIiijI'li 1�8� °2 nnn e' g.: � E a ogE .1 i °a5 b-eb o :i.pioi ;.. p�"ja ibo 'k fp` '�L y 81 1eg ;e11I2ly9y.;. yi IN% egb 1ii5e @�1j� rge=ec?3$ � # :r �8�e�aa :e�Fx�; i! �: 8 � � �'it8�6 �i�r9i1 'it! $1 2 ee ;4° � 14;i4$' ; f � §.� l? 2A geels° 48151. I 99litg�?Zf44:8e ia& B6?1i�EE?4t4EFEf� -0 8^ rc ^ 9 tab 2tag 8206 10,,, L O °n t VICINITY MAP STATISTICS 1,, hi! nIZ a' at J a w u 4 1 15 A2AMPI11, “.0.1 uNtaut9Ftrirli1 -wsy,y�sar -ir wwnt —w da>�= _ .. _. . �. nran7carE :;:ci.,a�.ia..4 ;c� %= c9i iti, iHNkR'1a(I= f3 q . i ' cf iti � ilk N z 0 4 1u 111 0 w X W § E ft 8s OlyTir\ 61 6 111111101 r 48th Avenue Sou I i 1 I ki 1 I HliIH Hi H 1 1 g I g g it 'Ol d d g g h ini 4.1 g h et In loi In d En ii to g 0. n tEl h h ; . 1.1 h 1 V la ,1.14.1t/1411.1,*.,4112.!.1..F, • "2 1 ' • 1 g i I ""°""° °" W°" Spn.. 11111111111"4 " 1 _$ " / 11 11 11 II h il 1 11 li ii P I 1 H 11 11 la e ig if 11 i' 11 id I/ ) 0 (9 ro p:1 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 0 7 1998 "ERMIT CENTER 0 * A F F I D A V I T C91 (v-d, SAIW 3Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda - Packet Lj Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: 0 Determination of Non - significance Omiti Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action 0 Official Notice 0 Other 3 oars) - ('C I -e v QV eLJ 0Notice Application for O Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit was mauled to each of the following addresses on Name of Project t +( LL..1 -Da clt File Number L a(cc- oo Lt s - ., , '' { z • • J O 0 a0 i w W =. J �. w0 gQ I-w 1 zo w • w. U ❑ I- w w; I- -- u-o .z. w 0 z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Board of Architectural Review and Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on November 12, 1998 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd., to discuss the following: BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L98 -0045 Downtown Harley Davidson Design Review Approval to remodel and expand an existing 16,000 square foot building for a new 34,000 square foot retail store 13001- 48th Ave. S. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement, or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division at 431 -3670. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: October 30, 1998, Seattle Times Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 " A F F I D A V I T I, ,21) /'t C Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet fl Board of Appeals Agenda Packet flPlanning Commission Agenda Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fJShoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: ODetermination of Non - significance fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance flDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice LI Notice of Action 00f ficial Notice 0 Other 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project To-'41t4 -0-2,4 .hgSignature File Number ( R- 0 v . City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director OCTOBER 29, 1998 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Downtown Harley Davidson has filed an application for Design Review approval, Number L98 -0045, for a 34,000 square foot retail store at 13001 - 48th Ave S. You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing scheduled for November 12, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. before the Planning Commission. The hearing will take place at City Hall in City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. To confirm the time and date before the hearing, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Michael Jenkins at 431 -3685 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Permits applied for include: • Conditional Use Permit • SEPA Checklist Other known required permits include: • Development Permit • Land Altering Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NOMSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:, REMODEL EXISTING 16.000 SO FT BUILDING TO CREATE A 34.000 SO FT RETAIL:STORE PROPONENT: DBM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 13001 48 AV S PARCEL NO: 000300 -0046 SEC/TWN/RNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E98 -0021. The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EI'S) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental. checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *' k**• k*****: k***************: Q*** **** * * * * *** * *** ***:k'k** *40 **: *****:k*** *k:k:k* * *** This determination is final and signed this 2,4C...)__ day of 1992. O Steve Lancaster Responsible Official: City of Tukwila. ,(206): :431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. ,.WA 93188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. ATTACHMENT C «. ry ryw ▪ 5 U o rnw w =! U) LL w 0; -j u. z• a 1-w zF. F- O: z 1— 11J in 0i O o F-' ww H u. 0 ti.. Z. O City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins Date: October 27, 1998 Re: E98 -0021, Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48 Av S. Project Description: This SEPA review is for the construction of a 34,000 square foot Harley Davidson retail store. The project will include substantial remodeling of an 16,000 square foot existing building, previously used by the Washington Pottery Works. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Site is relatively flat. Some cut and fill will be required for expansion of existing building, parking area and landscaping. Erosion control will occur during clearing of site and building construction to include a siltation pond, fabric fencing, hay bales and hydro- seeding. A Land Altering Permit for movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards is required. 88% of the site will include impervious surfaces. • Air Dust will be generated during construction, with watering to control dust. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 � E98 -0021 - Harley Davidson 13001 - 48 Ave. S. October 27, 1998 • Water Green River is located approximately 700 feet from site. Surface water runoff from �—z impervious surfaces will be collected and treated on -site prior to discharge to off -site w system. The storm drainage system must comply with the city's storm water ce 2 management ordinance and the King County Surface Water Design Manual. A JU bioswale along part of the front yard will be included, as well as a surface /sub - surface o stormwater collection system. An off -site analysis including upstream and w = downstream drainage with retention analysis has been submitted. �' ~ • w w u-Q D.a z1 w �o z w 0 O U: w w 0;. Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to heat proposed structure. The structure O, must comply with the Washington State Energy Code. w z' U ° 0 • Plants No vegetation on site. • Animals No impact. Energy/Natural Resources • Environmental Health No known environmental hazards. Noise will be generated both during construction period and from traffic after project is completed. Construction activities must comply with Tukwila's Noise Ordinance (TMC 8.22). Land/Shoreline Use The property is currently occupied by the shell of the Washington Pottery building. Adjacent uses are a mix of commercial, light industrial and distribution/warehousing. The property is located in the Commercial/Light Industrial zone. Removal of substantial portions of the building, as indicated in the applicant's plans, would require a Demolition Permit. Approval by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), per TMC 18.60, is required prior to filing of a Development Permit. • Housing No impact. � z E98 -0021 - Harley Davidson 13001 - 48 Ave. S. October 27, 1998 • Aesthetics The height of the building at the apex of the roof is 29 feet, 8 inches, which will not be altered by the remodeling of this structure. The predominate building materials include standing seam metal walls and roof, Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) and glass brick. As referenced, BAR approval is required. • Light and Glare A lighting plan will be submitted with the landscape plan, for approval by the BAR. Pedestrian, parking and architectural enhancement lighting will be included. Shields and/or reflectors will be uses on parking lot standards to avoid off -site impacts. • Recreation No impact. • Historic /Cultural Preservation No impact. • Transportation 66 parking spaces will be created as a result of this project. An existing drive at the east side of the property will remain, to be used for service vehicles only. A 10 foot easement along the front property line and 15 foot easement along the east property line will be recorded to facilitate future right -of -way. Approximately 300 trips per day will be generated a result of this project. A traffic study is required. The project must comply with the City's traffic concurrency ordinance (TMC 9.48). • Public Services The facility may require fire and police protection as well as emergency services. • Utilities The site is served by the City of Tukwila Sewer and Water utilities. Electric, gas and telephone services will be secured Recommendation: DNS r r r CHECKLIST NO: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Downtown Harley- Davidson 2. Name of Applicant: Fiorillo Northwest Inc. 3. Mailing address, phone number of applicant and contact person: Brett Jacobsen Fiorillo Northwest Inc. P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166 -0826 (206) 241 -2600 ir 4. Date checklist prepared: August 18, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule ( in cluding phasing, if applicable): The anticipated timing of the project is to begin construction October 1, 1998 and complete construction by March 31, 1999. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 1 1 1 1 1 No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No previous environmental information has been prepared on this project that would affect this proposal to our knowledge. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. We are not aware of any other government approvals or proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal. \data \word\ecapp. doc Page 2 z z ~ w: 6 JU U O0. rn W z` J - w0 g? ED_ a =W I— 0 z w uj • M' oI— w w; - U i:-Lzo ui Z` U =: O ~ z 1 1 1 r r r e w 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 �1 I' 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit, mechanical permit, rack storage, design review, sign permits, utility permit, building expansion and miscellaneous permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist.that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information or project description). The site is approximately 1.7 acres in size, according to the King County Assessor's Office. A copy of the King County assessor's map showing the property configuration and dimensions is attached for reference. This property is zoned as C/LI (commercial /light industrial). Currently a vacant 16,000 square foot steel - framed warehouse building exists on the site. The proposal includes remodeling this existing building and adding up to 25,000 square feet of expansion. The finished building will be a Harley- Davidson retail and service store including storage and office space. Part of the proposal also includes paving the existing yard /parking lot. Landscaping will be done in accordance with City codes. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site for the proposed project is located at 13001 48th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located in section 14 and 15, township 23N, and range 4 east. Enclosed with this checklist are a legal description, site plan, assessor's map, vicinity map, and topographic map. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. \data \word\ecapp.doc . Page 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountains, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? steepest slope on the site is approximately 15 %. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Please see the attached SCS soils type maps for this project. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is anticipated that only minor cuts and fills will be required to provide subgrades for pavement. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Erosion could occur during clearing and construction. During construction, a substantial amount of the site will be exposed, and vegetation will be removed. During construction activity, siltation could occur due to the construction activities themselves as well as the presence of heavy machinery on the site. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 88% of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction. \data \word\ecapp.doc Page 4 1 �) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if �I any: �e r� r� r Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to earth are as follows: 1. Design and have approved a temporary erosion control plan by the local agency. 2. Implementation of best management practices in the field during construction. 3. Follow up during construction activities to provide additional temporary erosion control measures as necessary and as required by the local agency. 4. Specifically, the following measures will be implemented during construction on this project: construction of a siltation pond to remove sediment from stormwater run -off on the site, the construction of Marafi filter fabric fences to ensure that silt -laden water does not escape onto adjacent properties and cause damage, the construction and use of ditches and rock -check dams to attenuate the velocity of stormwater on the project, the use of hay bales to provide additional filtering systems as necessary, the construction of rock entrances to remove soil from construction machinery wheels prior to exiting the site, utilizing mulch and /or hydro- seeding to stabilize the site during wet weather conditions, and other temporary erosion controls as deemed necessary by the inspector in the field during construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Dust and diesel emissions from the construction machinery would result during construction. Once the project is completed, no significant emissions would result from the proposal. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. ■data \word \ecapp.doc '; Page 5 'el 1 1 1 1 0 1 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Standard measures to reduce or control emissions during construction are as follows: 1. Regular use of watering vehicles to attenuate dust particles on the site during construction. 2. Proper maintenance of all vehicles to limit diesel emissions during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: \data \word \eca pp.doc 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream and river it flows into. The Green River is located approximately 700 feet north of the site. 2 Will the project require'any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Not to our knowledge. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain. If so, note location on the site plan. No. Page 6 tt 1 �i 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, not to our knowledge. Ground: Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. j 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of 1 houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the ► system(s) are expected to serve. L None. All sewage facilities on the site will be connected to the existing City of Tukwila sanitary sewer system. Therefore, there will be no discharge from septic tanks or other sources into the ground water. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater): 1. Describe the source of . runoff (including stormwater) the method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this flow into other waters? If so, describe. Unlike the present stormwater system for the property, stormwater runoff for this project will be collected and treated into stormwater filtering systems as required by the City of Tukwila. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Stormwater mitigation measures will include the following: \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 7 z w �L. - U 00 t CI CO 1.1.1 w =: J 1—: U) u_ w0 u. a a w z� z o; U 0 u) O I—. w u.l U LL z U- 0 z 1. Construction of a surface or sub - surface stormwater collection system. 2. Biofiltration and /or water quality will also be provided in addition to the above in accordance with local agency requirements. . Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There is no existing vegetation located on the 1.7 -acre property. Landscaping, however, will be provided in and around the project in accordance with City codes and requirements. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to be present on or near the site. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Proposed landscaping provided at the time of the ultimate development of the property will be designed, approved, and constructed per City /County codes and requirements. This will require the use of landscape and /or buffer areas around the perimeter of the property, as well as internal landscaping and buffering, which is also required by agency code. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Pigeons Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: \data \word \ecapp.doc • FIECE!VED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 0 7 1998 PERMIT CENTER Page 8 z Wi• z. 6 mow' JU U O0 U CO 111 W1 w0 2 gQ' id �w 2 z� I— 0 Z w w 0 I—; w11'. = U' O W z' z M r 1 t e r, 0 f 1 t b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None are proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kind of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood, stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas energy will be utilized to serve the finished project. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. c. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. All buildings will be constructed utilizing the Washington State Energy Code and will incorporate energy conserving features. 7. Environmental Health a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazard waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. \data \word\eca pp.doc Not to our knowledge. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services that might be required on the project would primarily be required during construction, due to specialized construction _� Page 9 z w ce aa JU U 0 U W J F- U) w wo co �• w z= w1 o 0 C.)n, O 1- w • w 0 uiz U N i 0 I- M M activities on the project. Special medic services, etc. may be required by local emergency medical providers in order to address the medical needs of workers during construction. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if z any. E- w None are proposed. D JU U b. Noise co 0 W = J i- t What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for w o example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2 None to our knowledge. u) 3 �a =w I— _. z �. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, z o operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 2 n p. Noise generated from the project would occur during the construction 0 -, phases of the project, and primarily be limited to the use of construction w w vehicles and construction activity on the site. 0. �o After construction, the noise levels on the project would be those generally v z. u) associated with activities as allowed on this property. These would likely o be noises associated with vehicles entering and exiting parking areas, pedestrian traffic, and general activities of people during normal hours of operation. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. No specific measures are proposed. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1. North of the site: Semi- truck/trailer storage area. 2. East of the site: Motel and restaurant. 3. South of the site: Commercial trucking business facility. \data \word\ecapp.doc Page 10 0 e w 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4. West of the site: Truck storage yard. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No, not to our knowledge. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing vacant warehouse steel - framed building to the eastern side of the site. The existing building covers a total of 16,000 square feet. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial /light industrial (C/LI) as classified in the City of Tukwila Zoning Code. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Incorporated City. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N /A. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 35 people would reside or work in the completed project. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None to our knowledge. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed. \data \word \eca p p. d o c Page 11 z • �W. 2 6 J 0. oo co w= J F- L; • Wo IL.a cr to W Z= Z o. 11J uji U O co; Ant- 11.1 = U' z, L U =; O ~. Z.. N ; 1 1 I. Proposed measures to ensure the p land uses and plans, if any. This project meets or satisfies and projected land uses in the area. 9. Housing 10. a. Approximately how many units w middle, or low- income housing. N /A. oposal is compatible with existing and projected s compatible with all of the known existing and uld be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, b. Approximately how many units, i any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housin :. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or co None are proposed. Aesthetics trol housing impacts, if any. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building ma erial(s) proposed? The tallest height of any structu e, not including antennas, on the proposed . project would be that as allowed under the current City zoning code for the . zoning on this site. b. What views in the immediate vicini would be altered or obstructed? None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or con All applicable local, state, and fed the project. This will ensure a community. \data\word\ecapp.doc rol aesthetic impacts, if any. ral codes will be adhered to in the design of sthetic compatibility with the surrounding Page 12 z Z cc 6 UO cnw W 2' cn u.: uW O 2 u. co zF �0 z w ,O 0 H WW U L 0: Z w — 1_, 0 z K 1 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare will be produced by the completed project in the form of: 1. Light produced from normal activities associated with the type of project proposed. 2. Parking lot lighting as necessary for safety reasons. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Light in parking lots will be directed down through the use of reflectors. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? Shields and /or reflectors will be used on all parking lot lighting standards in order to direct light and glare downward to ensure stray light does not affect adjacent property owners adversely. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course is to the southeast of the site, a community center park is located to the southwest of the site, and Southgate Park is located to the south of the site. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. This proposal will not create an impact on recreational facilities. \data\wordlecapp.doc .. 1j ✓ 1 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None exist to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached site plan for specific traffic routing in, through, and around the project. Is site currently serviced in public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit, stop? Yes, three buses service this particular area. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. 1 The completed project would consist of approximately 70 parking spaces. The project would not eliminate any parking spaces. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. \data \word\ecapp.doc Page 14 z �• oo CO 0' W= in gQ • ci I-w 2 z1._ zo w o ff' C-) I--. ww 1-• U' IL 0 LLI Z' 0 P- ~ 0 H z 1 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed project will generate approximately 300 trips per day. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m., Saturday 10 :00 — 4:00 Y a.m. p.m., therefore, there will be no a.m. peak hour trips generated by this proposal. The project will generate approximately 13 p.m. peak hour trips. Peak volumes will occur on Saturday. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, the project would result in the increased need for public services including fire protection, police protection, health care, etc. The increase in these services would be those normally associated with the proposed uses. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The direct financial on impacts public p p c services will be addressed via the increase in tax rates and the collection of additional tax revenue for the local agencies upon development of this property. This will include additional funds which will be generated for additional fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, etc. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: \data \word \ecapp, doc �Eri ,kr�+.Lxi;.`, +., < b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. WATER: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 SEWER: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 ELECTRICITY: Puget Sound Energy 805 156th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (888) 225 -5773 TELEPHONE: U.S. West Communications 14422 SE 260`h Kent, WA 98032 (800) 603 -6000 REFUSE SERVICE: Waste Management - Rainier 6350 South 143`d Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 243 -4050 \data \word \ecapp.doc z i� cc QQom, J`O UO W co w in I u.' wO u. a 1— i Z 1: Z o; W 0 92 sp F- ww. I U., LL 0 L1• Z. UU 0 z Page 16 r� M rif .' C. SIGNATURE I hereby state that I am the owner or authorized agent listed above, and certify that all information contained above and in exhibits attached hereto are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the processing of this application may require additional supporting material upon request to City staff. RIGHT OF ENTRY: By signing this application the applicant grants unto the City and it's agents the right to enter upon the premises for purpose of conducting all necessary inspection to determine compliance with applicable laws, codes, and regulations. This right of entry shall continue until a certificate of occupancy is issued for the P roPrh'• e rY all Signature of Property Owner: Date: Signature of Agent: Date: 1 6 Signature of Applica t: Date: 9838c.008 \data \word \ecapp.doc Page 17 z i1-- .- re 6 00 ,No W= L: W0 11- Q z z= zI 2 U a' I- W 1 Ui z ui 0 Z From: Gary Barnett To: Michael @TUK- MAIL.6300 -PO, Date: 10/12/98 2:45pm Subject: Harley Davidson -Reply -Reply -Reply Yeah, the conditions will be ordinance driven, not sepa. BUT, the site will change significantly due to road and drainage, affecting everything. At a meeting last Friday, applicant agreed to ROW stuff. I will be contacting the engineer to talk drainage. CC: Joanna Z _ t— W: JU; UO Co W• LLJ J t— W O gQ• . = Ci W Z O Z F— U co D — • O. t11 Z H = OH z From: Michael Jenkins To: Brian, Jack, Joanna, Gary-B, Michael Date: 10/12/98 1:57pm Subject: Harley Davidson -Reply -Reply Thanks for the update Gary. Becuase of the delays, I have re- scheduled their hearing to November 11, however needless to say that applicant was not happy. Having said that, it seems like the issues are moving forward, but here are my concerns: 1. Upon my review of the 1998 CIP, a proposed ROW has not been indicated in the plans for the east side of their parcel. Accordingly, our SEPA determination could not include any mitigations. However, if you have the ability to do that through the concurrency ordinance, it probably is the best legal basis for such a requirement. Becuase of the lack of such legal authority, I think we may have to proceed on that issue. 2. If the storm water plan does not meet PW standards yet, can we just go ahead and require them to meet are stormwater ordinance and mention that in the SEPA determination, like the concurrency Issue for traffic mentioned above? It seems that the need for a Flood Control Zone permit requirement can also be mentioned in the SEPA as well. It also looks like some sort of fair share agreement for expansion of the system on 48th for drainage may also be where you are heading. It seems like these issues can be handled through existing regs /ordinances. If you think that there are going to be changes to their site plan due to compliance with these issues, please let me know as soon as possible. Otherwise, any changes to just the civil drawing that would not impact the site plan, landscape plan and building elevations won't be an issue at Design Review and we can proceed with giving this applicant a timely hearing. CC: Gary-B From: Gary Barnett To: Michael @TUK- MAIL.6300 -PO, Brian, Jack, Joanna Date: 10/12/98 10:17a m Subject: Harley Davidson -Reply PW recommends that the BAR hearing and SEPA determination not be concluded until we have met with the applicant. There are several issues at play here. 1. Ross Heller is coordinating the BNSF access project, which includes consideration of a north /south ROW on the east side of Harley. This coordination is consdered signifcant to the development of the CIP project. 2. The storm water plan for the site is inconsistent with the designer's previous correspondence and communications. Clarification of intent is needed. The system as proposed may not meet PW requirements. There is a larger issue that the designer has not addressed and is quite significant: the building finish floor sits low on the site is subject to flooding due to a) limited pump capacity onsite b) the city system in 48th is potentially undersized and will possibly induce flooding to low Tying sites such as this one. I regret that PW has not been able to resolve these issues in the scheduled timelines. Again, I request that BAR and SEPA be left open until PW and applicant explore these Issues and determine potential solutions. CC: Gary-B f— W CC 2 00 mo0 w' W I: w 0' 2 gQ. (S0 �w Z I- O. Z W 0 0 0 I— w uw' ..O Z'. W CO O ~` Z From: Michael Jenkins To: Gary-B, Joanna, Brian, Jack, Michael Date: 10/7/98 2:59pm Subject: Harley Davidson JoAnna informed me that prior to giving me cooments on SEPA and Design Review that PW will be holding a meeting with these applicants at the end of this week. The comments on these projects were due on September 12 and a BAR hearing is scheduled for October 22. Since the hearing packet must be reviewed and approved prior to October 13, we are running out of time. Please let me know as soon as possible or we will have to proceed. 0: W U0 rn 0 W= —1 1—. W0 2 g J' u. =W I- 0: Z i- 1/1 uj 2 V0 0 0 I•— WW;. U' u_ O' .Z CU co o Z From: Michael Jenkins To: Jack, Michael Date: 9/29/98 10:28am Subject: Harley Davidson 1 met with the applicant's yesterday to discuss all of their design review Issues and briefly touched upon the proposed street. I informed them that unless their is an adopted plan, policy or other legal basis for the street, we would be assuming for this project that there will not be a street, because if a street does occur, the elevations would need to be revised to create more visual interest along the new street. I spoke to Gary B and JoAnna about this today and they are in the process of scheduling a meeting with the applicant and Ross H. about this issue. I told them to keep me informed. We are tentatively scheduled for an October 22 BAR hearing, which may have to be moved to November 12. They were nervous about the October 22 hearing date, in order to get this resolved. 2 H', W J U U O' W =, . J E- U) u. WO 2 u- a 1— W Z� I- O. Z 1—. LU U c' O- C]I— Will 1—V LLI 1- _ . ~ 0 Z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 9, 1998 Brett Jacobsen Fiorello Northwest 131 S.W. 156th Street Seattle, WA 98166 Re: Downtown Harley Davidson (L98 -0045 / E98 -0021) Dear Brett: Thank you for submitting the revised Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Elevations following our meeting on September 28. On my initial review, the following is a list of suggested revisions that I believe will clarify the plan and help in complying with Design Review guidelines: Landscape Plan U w J1. 2 u- ill 0 �Q =• a - w Z= I- o wi w U0 o N: 0 F-: =w • To ensure long -term viability, the Red Maple and Hornbeam Maple should be o a minimum 4" caliper „ z. • The 4 species used in understory plantings next to the building, on property lines and on planting islands are grouped awkwardly. Please review, reduce the number of species and plant in an orderly, not grouped manner • 9 species of low -lying plants or ground covers have been indicated. Please reduced the number and plant in an orderly, not grouped manner • The garbage /recycling area should be shown in elevation • A color rendering of the landscape plan should be provided at the hearing Elevations • The glass block / CMU base should be extended around the entire building • Please include samples of all building materials, including metal corners / belly banding in material /color sample board • Please indicate color /materials for all exterior doors • Please consider adding additional course(s) of smooth face CMU within base for added visual interest • Extending the roofline from the base of the building should be investigated to provide a stronger distinction between building components • A color rendering of the elevations should be provided at the hearing 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 October 9, 1998 Brett Jacobsen Re: Downtown Harley Davidson Page Two I believe that instituting these revisions will help you comply with the Design Guidelines and will ultimately provide your client with a building that will be of the high - quality design sought by the City in our new development. If you or your clients have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner z _1 rew J U' O 0, W z` J CO IL w 0. g Q, z• d w z� wo. 2 .0 0==. �0 H = U'' . Zi 11J O Z :: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 8, 1998 Brett Jacobsen Fiorello Northwest 131 S. W. 156th Street Seattle, WA 98166 Re: Downtown Harley Davidson (L98 -0045 / E98 -0021) Dear Brett: To confirm our telephone conversation of October 8, 1998, I have changed the scheduled date for your hearing before the Board of Architectural Review from October 22 to November 12, 1998. I changed the date of the hearing due to the delay in completing our SEPA determination and unresolved issues with the landscape, site plan and the building elevations. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner 6 h S 10 cr a , s „ 98 0b x(31 -3670 • Fay a 4313665 02/06/1996 04:38 253 - 887 -0925 DBM CONS ENG PAGE 03/04 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter )Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND. POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila Y r 93/44-41r--1[4-C -0 `'"+(Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on5f 614 . Z Methe Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at / 490 / r4`4-vF S. so as to be clearly seen from each right -99f -way providing primary vehic z'•'ccess to . - broperty for application file number fig' 0045.'�L/ � pplicant Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 23. day of T , 19 `?8 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at3I.ACr--Th,A„,to1 -1�. My commission expires on 1.0 - 2=� RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP231998 A F F I D A V I T I661"12442-r0 l 0 Notice of Public Hearing fl Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Packet OBoard of Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda OPlanning Commission Agenda Packet • fJ Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: 0 Determination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance LiDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action 0 Official Notice DUB ��v� 0 Other � gilt c. Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on F/z zif,r . Name of Project S R+ Signature File Number, V? DDcrS- City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 1998 The following applications have been submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and decision. FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: L98 -0045 (Design Review) E98 -0021 (SEPA Checklist) DBM Consulting Engineers 13001 - 48th Ave S.. Construction of a 34,000 square foot Harley Davidson retail store Development Permit Land Altering Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on October 7, 1998. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on October 22, 1998. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the hearing is still scheduled for this date. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431 -3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 File: 35mm Drawing# `� I- Z W JU U 0: co a co uj LIJ W• 0 _- : 52 d I-'w Z 1 W OI-` gyp`. #-,C) W 0 h. 2U • 0 Z U W; H =: O Z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 16, 1998 Roberta Marta DBM Consulting Engineers 502 - 16th St., N.E., Suite 312 Auburn, WA 98002 z NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Z QtQr 2 JU U0 U0 • LLI J= • w w0 CO =a �w Z= h 0 zi- w w Your application on behalf of Downtown Harley Davidson, for a 34,000 square foot retail store, has been • N. found to be complete on September 16, 1998 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. 01-- The project has been assigned to Michael Jenkins and is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before = the Planning Commission on October 22, 1998. f- The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You ti i received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you 0 z must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. This notice is also available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to the our office. RE: Design Review and SEPA checklist for Downtown Harley Davidson, 13001 - 48th Ave S. (L98 -0045 / E98- 0021). Dear Ms. Marta: This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 206- 431 -3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 DOWNTOWN HARLEY DAVIDSON 13001- 48TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON APPLICANTS RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA: CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 1 1998 FEF1MIr CENTER A. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE 1. The site has been designed to create a desirable transition with the streetscape by providing a 10 foot wide planter along the road frontage planted with grass, shrubs, and street trees. Pedestrian movement will be provided internally on sidewalks. These internal sidewalks will connect to external sidewalks to be provided with the future 48th Street improvement project. 2. Views of the parking area adjacent to 48th Ave. will be screened from the street by the landscaping provided along the road frontage as well as with landscaping in the parking lot planter islands. 3. The remodeled building will be well within height and scale in relation to the site. B. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE & SITE TO ADJOINING AREA 1. This remodeled facility will provide an upgraded look from the surrounding uses, but will possess similarities in texture, line and mass. 2. Although not required by code, landscaping will be provided along the southerly and westerly property lines except in that area adjacent to the building which will instead be used for traffic circulation purposes. 3. The remodeled building will provide a cohesive, but upscale and modern look relative to the surrounding industrial neighborhood. 4.. The building is designed to separate delivery vehicles from the customer vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Delivery vehicles will use the rear entrance to access the building, whereas all customer traffic will remain on the front parking lot area. 5. In order to facilitate on site circulation with the street circulation we have limited the property to two accesses. One access primarily for the customers on the front side of the building, and one access for service vehicles along the rear of the building. C. LANDSCAPE & SITE TREATMENT 1. There are no topographic features to the site, the site is flat. 2. The site's flat walks and parking area create a `user friendly" appearance. 1 . 3. The proposed landscaping will soften the industrial look of the building and screen views of the parking lot. 4. The layout of the facility is situated to avoid pedestrian and vehicular traffic across landscape areas. In planter areas adjacent to sidewalks hardy plant material will be used(please see landscape plan). 5. Trees will be used both adjacent to the building and in the parking lot islands(please see landscape plan). 6. There are no service yards on this property. 7. The site is presently fenced on all sides except that side adjacent to 48th Avenue. Fencing may be provided along the road frontage. 8. Lighting will be provided in parking lot areas through the use of light standards which are of compatible style and color in relation to the building. These light standards direct the light down toward the parking areas, thereby minimize off site impacts. Lighting will be provided from the building at loading/service entrances as well as customer entrances. Soft flood lighting may be incorporated along the front building facade to create visually aesthetic look during the evening hours. D. BUILDING DESIGN 1. The architectural style is industrial in nature and creates a cohesive appearance with buildings in the surrounding area. 2. The building scale is very much in keeping with the surround neighborhood, and will create a nice transition between the industrial and the restaurant/hotel uses in the vicinity. 3. All building components have been designed in proportion and in relation to one another. All building components have been designed with materials which insure a life expectancy equal to the steel structure of the building. 4. The base color of the building will be a galvanized metal gray with black and orange highlight accents(the Harley Davidson corporate colors). 5. All mechanical hardware will be placed behind the parapet walls located at the two "pop outs" at the front of the building 6. As mentioned previously, all light fixtures are designed to be complementary with the building design and colors. 2 7. To avoid monotony in building design, we provided modulation along the building facade, anti in those areas also provided a steel eve design for additional relief and character. E. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES & STREET FURNITURE 1. There are no miscellaneous structures or street furnishings on the project. 2. There are no miscellaneous structures or street furnishings on the project. 3 :. w' ce ¢¢=. J0: O 0! U) 0; W' W= • u. W O. g • Q. w 0 = Ci H=, Z� I- O Z O (12; O H, Ul 2 U H - H; O ii Z; U , O H' z. TECHNICAL INFORAiATION REPORT FOR RUSS TOM BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION LOCATED AT 13001 - 48th Avenue South IN TUKWILLA,.STATE OF WASHINGTON For:. Russ Tom Our Job No. 9838 Dated: July 9, 1998 . leo/ oug van Gelder Project Engineer Dana. B. Mower, P.E. Principal Engineer. DBM Consulting Engineers 502 16`h Street, N.E., Suite 312 Auburn, Washington 98002 Phone: ; (253),887-0924 Civil Engineering, Land Planning, Surveying, and Environmental Service RECENED LAITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 1 1998 PERMIT CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS ., 1 3.1 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS „ 1 3.2 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 1 4.0 RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.1 EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY 2 4.2 WATER DETENTION ANALYSIS and DESIGN 2 4.3 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS and DESIGN 2 4.4 WATER RETENTION ANALYSIS and DESIGN . 2 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN . 3 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES . 3 7.0 BASIN COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS 3 8.0 OTHER PERMITS .3 9.0 EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 3 APPENDIX A: APPENDIX B: APPENDIX C: APPENDIX D: APPENDIX E: APPENDIX F: APPENDIX G: APPENDIX H: APPENDIX I: APPENDICES VICINITY MAP ASSESSORS MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION FLOODPLAIN / FLOODWAY MAP KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIOS EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY MAP ZONING MAP HYDROLOGY / FACILITY DESIGN CALCULATIONS TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS SOILS REPORT z �w U0 { (0• ° J • u_ . w0 g Z-• J. �w Z= 1- 0 z I— LL! uj • rn ° • LLJ 0 WZ O H Z 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW This Technical Information Report is for Russ Tom's Building Permit Application for the City of Tukwila, Washington. The proposed project is a 1.8 acre development in which Russ Tom is planning to remodel the existing building, develop a parking lot and a possible addition to the building in the future. This will increase impervious area of the lot by approximately 60%. The existing building is approximately 16,000 square feet. The proposed future building, however, will not occur for five to ten years. The site is located in Sections 14 and 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. Please see the attached vicinity and assessor's map. This site is located at 13001 — 48th Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington. The site is currently covered with clay with some grass and contains and existing building. The proposed site conditions will include landscaped areas, parking, remodeled building, storage vault and a compost filter system. The site will be graded and it is our interpretation that the site will be almost balanced with respect to cut and fill. 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY Currently, the entire site is mostly composed of red clay with some vegetation along the outer edges. This site is extremely flat with a grade differential of only two feet across the 1.8 acres. The site is approximately two feet lower that the 48th Avenue South Street. Currently, the drainage from this site flows to catch basins and eventually to additional catch basins along 48th Avenue South. 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS 3.1 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE BASIN Currently all the upstream drainage is contain to the surrounding property and discharge to the city storm drainage system. 3.2 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Storm water will discharge to the existing city storm drainage system along 48th Avenue South. This system runs north easternly for approxamately 3/4 of a mile before entering the Green River. 4.0 STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS and DESIGN 4.1 EXISTING SITE HYDROLOGY The proposed project area consists of 1.8 acres of red clay and some tall grass. The project site generally drains to the east and ultimately to the catch basins. Flow from the catch basins runs into the current drainage system along 48th Avenue South. The hydraulic soil group is assumed to be C.1, the curve number selected and the time of concentration calculated for this new site drainage basin is located in the attached appendix of the storm drainage calculations. There are no wetlands on the site. 4.2 WATER DETENTION ANALYSIS and DESIGN The proposed development of Downtown Harley Davidson will consist of two floors totaling 32,000 square feet. A building complex with a total impervious percentage of approximately 80 %. The limits of clearing will encompass approximately the entire 1.8 acres of the project. The drainage from the developed project area will be sheet flow to catch basins. The catch basins will then flow the water to a vault size for 25% of the total volume for the 2 -year storm event. No detention is required based on 1.2.3 -5 in the King County Surface Water Design Manual which states; On -site peak rate runoff control will not be required for a proposed project in the following situations. The proposed project site post - developed peak rate for runoff rate for the 100 -year, 24 -hour duration design storm event is calculated for each discharge location to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions. Following the vault will be a dual pump system which will include an external alarm system. The water will be released at the 2 -year runoff rate. Ultimately, the water will leave the vault into the pre- existing drainage system along 48`h Avenue South. 4.3 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS and DESIGN In order to meet the requirements for this site, a biofiltration swale has been designed for this site. The biofiltration swale will run along the side of the proposed building parallel to 48th Avenue South. The pump will be maintained by a third party. 4.4 WATER RETENTION ANALYSIS and DESIGN A storage vault has been designed on the easterly part of the parking lot. The volume provided is approximately 2,720 cubic feet. The volume required is approximately 2,500 cubic feet. The King County Modeling Program Hyd was used for the vault design. The King County Modeling Program is based on the Santa Barbara unit hydrographic method. An emergency overflow spillway has been designed on the south east end of the building. z ~w• . 6 O 0 0) o W = J � Ci)w w 2 u- `.a = w F- _ z� O; w~ w 0 U • D- O 1-. ww • O.. wz o 2 O z 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The onsite conveyance syst basins will convey the sto storage vault. From the drainage system along 48`h ANALYSIS AND DESIGN e consists of 0.2% slopes to catch basins. The catch water to the compost filter system and then to the v ult the water will be pumped to the existing storm A enue. 6.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM PECIAL REPORTS and STUDIES There is no special conveyance report attached, however, there is a geotechnical report at the end of the appen ix. 7.0 BASIN and COMMUNITY "LANNING AREAS There are no special basin and ommunity planning areas applicable for the design of this site. 8.0 OTHER PERMITS REQUI ED FOR THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON THE SITE There are no other permits requ red at this time. 9.0 TEMPORARY EROSION /S DIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN A temporary erosion/sedimenta engineering design plan submitt interceptor swales along with ro and, throughout the site, runoff limits have been established at t fences are not needed, all water temporary erosion control plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See appendix B. ion control design plan has been included within the . Temporary erosion control features consist of k check dams throughout the site to limit erosion hile construction is occurring. Clearing and grading e property lines for the entire site. Filter fabric rains onto property and not off. Please see the VICINITY MAP JU, U O! UU W= • W O.• u a, cn F- _ • Z 0 F-;. W • W W" 'F=-V, Z • • U -z 1996 %%L611LQSFZ6i. M ' m --Z- SEE 656 HAP P: s Is RIB -r" Mfn s 'p _,n zsls • S s AY N109 AV N1[5 r;� r• � � "SAY Mgt • r/ ' I 1 �� v� � rA = .r , s ' u 1 5 1 _ r �!� a, Y . SnAI r oV i lI� : H NiM a' e c�N I 6-1 + UW 'e.a^� z N_ ms r H. I 5 ..... e I�gC HiBCi 1 oI �._ „ 'tiff H.�' '.'' C! "' 5 'M ` c =�• ml N` i N 5 i.:" — H:SC 1 z Qom^ —�S H15� lurC: � '� 5 IN � S AY KBE •+ / c. —, I .� -''.In 5 Smart•' —+urC .+' S 55 g. ILL :4. PACT 0000s I —•,11I / I T— Z; 5 ; Ar— � —=—Ux� E„,- Ar IN,1N1 =4 1s.- ! �j�_ 'Fitz I e��g s c:1 s' ; nc rTARY^ RD 1.7,... 17 ^i ��� a a Hll1 L, 1.500 NI leozrr " 7 A. I luez ° i S ur AY I H16Z t��„ oar —,., '' ! ' S Ar l H18Z 5 Ar II 2 ^ • suluN; : ,sI�� B Z'''.; .1 _ I N e I L ILLri 0., qq OUE I `4 S tlN2MNI r 1 L1") Lf) LO if51:: .,: dYW !�;� , .. . ti59 33S APPENDIX B: ASSESSORS MAP 31IS , It -,;.r.,-,-V4isoft. • r"Obv ot• .9, •■••••■■•••• •• 01.7.0• 0.1 •••fr. ,,,,, 1•• or■•••■ rrrrrrrr ;et ASIC A 15 S.4 t*P- q. .,••• •I rt. .•• 11 • 0 ciVEN SiElOSSDSSV :IseqS 3 N191.-VO-CE - 86-L661. 'VM 61-IN t'-2-QI MN ....3.11 . '11 I ...4. 031 i i 11. li N^§I 1 1 i 1 til z 4IS2:113Al2:1 l I 1 tv•ti " - * • • : b- £Z -VI3N • j o. Y v� V- £Z -SI3N 1,111. It 0 N 10 1 laela 'MNt -VO-EZ - 86-L661. 'VM '61-11y1 .' • Y THE OT.AL -. )3D). iE EP. KING '•E ER K!NG R KING • z m 0 V) N 0 0 rn z N O M Alb N 40'36'00" E LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHAN FOSTER AND C.C. LEWIS DONATION CLAIMS IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WM., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40'01'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 920.15 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE P.I. OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, NOW PAVED, SAID P.I. BEING APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET EAST AND 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST; THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ON A LINE 150.00 FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD A DISTANCE OF 835.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID END OF CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY, 3: THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 16.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WA'Y A DISTANCE OF 310.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 702.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 310.21; THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A. D1S TA.NCE OF 702.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; 450.00' ....•■• ••••• . •• • 0.3' SW'LY -15' TOGETHER WITH A. PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN 'MDTH EXTENDING FROM THE MOST SOUTHERL CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 835 FEET ALONG THE RIGHT CF WAY OF THE PUGET SOUND E LECTRIC RAILWAY, THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING IDENTICAL WITH THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER AND G.C. LEWIS DONATION CLAIMS IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40'01'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 920.15 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE P.I OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, NOW PAVED, SAID P.I. BEING APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET EAST AND 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST; THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ON A LINE 150.00 FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD A DISTANCE OF 835.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID END OF CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 16.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 310.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 450 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 310.21; THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 450 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR 48TH AVENUE SOUTH. 0.1' SWLY CN N; APPENDIX C: FLOODPLAIN / FLOODWAY MAP L. ( NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 957 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX KING COUNTY. UNINCORPORATED AREAS 530071 0957 F RENTON. CITY OF 530088 0957 F SEATTLE. CITY OF 530089 0957 F TUKWILA, CITY OF 530091 0957 F MAP NUMBER 53033C0957 F MAP REVISED: MAY 16, 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency • 1,41.0% ocp Y/FLOopPL EM MAP , , , , ZONE AE RM324 4 ."1 C>) \ 0 • 0,-;• °&4/ S PAMELA /DRIVE , N .4% 14 ZONE AH (EL 18) STREET RN Footbridi KING COUNTY SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOILOS W, JO O 0' W Z' W (I., w 0. N J tL ▪ =, Z �. I- 0 Z I-, .w N 0 F-! w W' •t2 tL Z. LU Z KING COUNTY SENSITIVE MAP FOLIOS ;'4li� i ~ B�oll'. N , hall - iii it t T li : i ji'31111 1 :i • iil:e macs �s» . yl , \._. ,e tjuesei 'ill ..r1,1,!!,"r �.aw,isE�..C. i • • $ L�eii .!i RRi��jj ;a'�21a�e' ii��1ri� to • .. t eetwl a2m+e�wrTif e g R x N,....... ��� s .• X 1'11' °� . �.. p. s4•_.....:I.:i,, ��4115 .rs agar. p l _ru.. t�i+li i•=1 "mmuIM ■ 1111Ei:111<I : . 1111 �l11 tiL �illldii - 1111 i111m iBlllll = ' 1111 I1/111i ■Ii111111111U111--1 ;; \t Ai111111Ei 1 i11111111C11• ` - ;f= S.4I111111U12ht1111l111i11 '' , sine �ld19111R1'11111111 gqyifii i ll',1 Finumm, lii , '-sLi.. •• 11 1� :L ` k,y. 11111.= Y ft-yn Mawr , Nt. >.oiiirn ..l. ii -c EINGIVOINFAININEINI. • 1Ml�tllen'-:rt:`. , i.�a11r11�11� 1iliaV.liil° 'go. 111le11t1TP i S «; wig ice: . li• ?_i .41rhan.smositaine t �ILI '14_ ma- *These *These coal mines have had additional min- ing since the most recent map was filed with the Washington Department of Natural Re- sourcei. Any development that occurs adJaceht to these areas should be preceded by a thorough study to confirm or deny the existence of additional subsurface tunnels. :"1k N m The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate. Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is illustrated on these maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area • as defined In the Sensitive Area Ordinance - is the legal control. IINIKIMIteig 1KIli� i�n�11��a►�.� lQllri, \1� Coal Mine Hazard Areas 1KIli� i�n�11��a►�.� lQllri, \1� Coal Mine Hazard Areas KING COUNTY SENSITIVE MAP FOLIOS ‘1'-af.it Rasp if nil L.1141 lair gold .-1,! I •610:e. re) time )1 taw at „maligalie karrts2 11 LaZ6;artnonIIIIIVIRVCre kritkiVilillinig dfiEllea-AMEMOIngl manna ilIl HMI Mph Nalliallint minziMMI MI 11111M ENIMMIIIMMEII nliMMINIUM211 IIIMMMOIMIIIMUR aliiIIIIIIIItianISMIMME 5,11EM9IIIIMMI 7,)N. • f a VI .4:7%;• Br; n 5Ina, 7,11.4.1t ' ir• !Ion- 4.• KrroQ. Ccarma., -r77=7.7 -... - mos ••7 allacrimribq -, 4 •-4-'k!' - 6 , .......4 MION "--',-,,. "...—■• 1 6 ' : '1'', l• — 44 1%141 r"FiliiiiIME pinurammi ibgfigiummanz :4-1111N • VII 1.---171114445-111=-etAici :;-.' „.- - .!: •: .......• 1110-4=Ma pi IM "Mtrzlill 11 mina .:41 a -MIME r- ..:', ffir " Its MI EMI min* mar 11111.11Pla ForErnlainiriN II . - V 7 X143 '‘44L , ....... 7 i,--,, S 1TE . igoirtel .: r; .-,.„;. . Irfa -z-=mmumwt --04110ffirindrt 211LOMMEMISIffiwo KVIIMIWALIP .-.`- •-------41' -711F'14-'7,_ ,„ /Lksi■ ,Y loe.43$19.0M. earairommon , oirpiwerin en. IIMISMIFEMI: ITOUTIPPIRIMmil v Alhiltriininaleiffini ,17,11enliligat■SINOW -N EMPINAM. A MIMOSA '704/ Int, •11•41. The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate. Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is illustrated on these maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area - as defined In the Sensitive Area Ordinance • Is the legal control. 1 See wetlands and landslide hazard maps for additional potential seismic hazard areas. Wetlands and landslide areas are susceptible to failure during earthquakes. Other seismic hazard areas not shown on this map are shorelines underlain by lacustrIne sediments; these are susceptible to liquefaction. Seismic Hazard Areas KING COUNTY SENSITIVE MAP FOLIOS ,,....., . ‘....11 • .(r • .N• NEM ilti• .. .W.- ..-" of ciustititar:718 ' di illia-V " 11 11 Invii .P litga IIIM pia kl ilit I 1111 ._ ,-,,,, ir 111111 -*‘, WHIM* liiiit‘A■ 4 • 114Ifiln% • Palni 1 • ^- ,,, Miriiiil. . um • ji bitt:an •• Kr IWZ:0-%2N40.1turs 125674i..x.\e;11.:;112 :\ ;?';t:._ '"'—`,■ , . 32 :, \ ..0-. r. ..... —1:1111111.tt.,., 14,11...t 1 M1111111 1111 111E6.1 iniE1:1151151 11111ilis Ir..5‹..'.. .r.=111M1 1111 1111111' 1 ‘.. Etillii. i'LliglI/11M12111.1' ', '.. .N\s'. • nIIIIIMMUMIAll MMIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrI, gssuiluliviammunlatro r 111B111111111111111111/111 BilMINE11111111111111111Ni1 .4 . .,:,.._ Men INNS ranaBIL r .- .:d4T-r.. • - .1A.. MIN .4 .:r. •i, -i. • MUNI.. r - .. •(11k.. 111311111151111M1 fi1C21111111191111 littal. - fiEW ■,-""—wm1riil mwmmlu rhunsign '11*-'2.441VP` 1161111n traavin .eauis -.1-141 prvilam Alkapimmissirw -), .......-.. X111111111114' IR 4tr,-...---_----4.11-........1.16a.r. • `' 1"- 1 .110-etsain • I ctlaill NORIERfr" 11• nillISER -. AEi .. •J ili .0/ ng! iirel 1 r2'T AV. 141 viviv.4- - 1-VG 41 • EArILE 0 .t. Syr. Mawr 111•erra• 11 •44.61111alj": •• The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- played on these maps are approximate. Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- opment proposal site. Where differences occur between what Is illustrated on these maps and the site conditions, the actual pre- sence or absence on the alto of the sensitive .. *:-. ,• • 1130" IL; . 1.ris .41. Si. Landslide Hazard Areas to KING COUNTY SENSITIVE MAP FOLIOS -4 May Cre '1 '�} rvslw- I Cr jok-A If= poll isnalaingtroorm ga _� RI areas dis- Proximate. have not devel- erences i n these c_. "ual pre - le sensitive itive Area r4 !'1V• Numbered wetlands, except those with an 'a' or "ID" designation are Included in the King County Wetlands Inventory , The locations of wetlands designated "a" have been verified on the site by a variety of sources. Wetlands designated "b" are map - ped In the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National wetlands Inventory, but their loca. tions have not been field verified. There may be gaps In the numbering se- quence within Individual drainage basins. 1.k1.7:414' Cowl �•V•• rJFi? s ✓ ri Wetlands n_�uc ■T1P oEN Wetlands Open Water Basin Boundaries Sub -basin Boundaries Du• - t i 'r ;111all if; OA . 131111 .4 -. f.'". 1 41..bir Viri iril 2"0 mailmill 101 ;1 11::: _Ai ifii Mt III haliki .111 imasme4e, 11 6,..arar,,,,i, 40,1111157 VIC :i..t.N. A 1451: 1118 " I I 11 455121111 SI J":NZ S3I ail i Inkr.z.....sia'a III. m- • Vai N- liamosse la .r.c=me ittairdia.... KING COUNTY SENSITIVE MAP FOLIOS 1 • gr. ... lk • /. l• • • sif.ATI Ln Mor 41.1 um up minim ,• • • latomalini 119.1 h. • - • 1-• We Or I FAM vre; - .."1110 r III VLF II At 4141t 5"11.1froatlf Sa.4gEr 11 ' 41 Shi I - . i e alti6...gorwip , filre,P2MglaWil HipailliMitilinThrl r .4 IVIRIEMPIng te j a 1111/201MATO • Rill "PI Ni 1121arrang ,V.).11111/911111FOROMO:%rit, iricr a I 411111 8KCIP imffiarg .11 r ci tive areas dis- a, vo approximate. Is that have not 'esent on a devel- Nhere differences lu ated on these r the actual pre- it >f the sensitive 1e,-..6ensitive Area ntrol.— •-•—■ • - 122;15' o.t ate. Erosion Hazard Areas • 'f KING COUNTY SENSITIVE MAP FOLIOS streams and 100 year flood plains APPENDIX E: EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY MAP z Wiz. w 6 JU 00 W =`, t-r w 0: g d' F-w. Z F- O Z w I-. U 0.- O 0, - 0; Z liI H F. - • O Z File: - ODH 35mm Drawing# z. 0 0' 0) 0, U) W W= W 0: H O' Z �- W uj 2 U0 O . O F_1. W;. u. 0 U Z U =� O .9 I \STKeih.$ 20' _ < / 36 to • 1, / /.1 I • torlivndy -1; a r ; y [..A8 'ige4 hanges #12535 . . , ..!...2 V 'Ik.„,..... S 154th Sy! _---72- '..r.??...-.. r1/4% \ SW 7th S' -l( iji) Tuk 'p a " -16 \, 1 ..i..,_ . •.. / \ Rent 23 ii It : i i ; 106 L:. . .--i /I .'" 0! , i ,1 V 27 _.!._.._'°) -: \ A\ Z 1 in I 1 1 10 ; ; S 176th St 1.71; S eaTa c 33 • S 188th St 1 1 0 1126 it; 1 I ; I - I I 11 $- I \ 1 , i s■-_j : 1 1 Nc • • • I 7 I ) I t SW I t; II j • \I 35 06 — 05 i 04 ttow r-c71 I 03 + 36 Kent ZONING CLASSIFICATION (DU = Dwelling Unit) I I 111111 A-10 - Agricultural, one DU per 10 acres A-35 - Agricultural, one DU per 35 acres F - Forest M - Mineral RA-2.5 - Rural Area, one DU per 5 acres` RA-5 - Rural Area, one DU per 5 acres RA-10 - Rural Area, one DU per 10 acres UR - Urban Reserve, one DU per 5 acres LJ R-1 - Residential, one DU per acre = R-4 - Residential, four DU per acre r. a co".I.-1..,+;•.1 a • • z re w 6 —1 O 0 ; C) LU 1.1J —1 1— COLL w 0 2 u. < I— Z 0 Z UJ w n a O :1= C) F- LU E- P: LI 0 z 0 APPENDIX G: HYDROLOGY / FACILITY DESIGN CALCULATIONS O 0' t NW W =' J w• 0 LL < co = - 0. F- _;. Zf, Z 0 !O 01—* WW 2 0 C 0- 1— z KING COU"NTY, WASHINGTON, S URF ACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 5 i 1 .4 .. ; - ... e• C-41 , . . IN -, . ..., , ...S. 4 4.L., 1 \ ‘ . ■ ........ I . ,, i , , (...1.5\ ,11 .."••••••.„....:,... ••••...„ ■\„4,...../ . .,/ _ • ■ ! 1') .'' i is • .— • • •,-- -- , '.. 1 -;.= •••--...---.... .... ••••. ' ''• i ":• I :t--- '-‘7"±- - 1„..Li...;__,.. c.„—_-___. •••',1 — ..... -........... • ..)..:. 1 ..-.L---'2`R."\f • .f. CV‘ i...•,i .-,--;‘,--111'-' 1.-• / CV st• : ' i i'' ...,.. .,..t........r- •,' ----.<'—',.. ' 7. 7 „fit / ;s'--• . ..•"=.... -'..--.\ --r /.• .. '-; cV 1••••-•-•1 t • ••• T / \ • CV .12 " • 'ars f 1/4 golo— 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 0.3.4.•""'" ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles 1: 300.000 ' 35 3.5.1-8 pvc- 1/90 11- a • z uJ re -.I 0 O 0 • ° LD L.L.1 L.L.1 1-- U) u_ 0 I—w g u. I a z 0 ZI- WW 0 O co O — O I— W uj I 0 9-7 0 O (I) i= O I- KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUR F ACE'WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 2.1 22 2.4 25 7' 2.6 2.7 3.0 - 3.z \.. I \ ., .. re ./ .....) . ., 4•=. / , 1 ....f.1,... ) i ) •5••••,•■ • . .. / ,. . .; 2iri = 7• ' .-- ! ' . : si ...3a 1. , - "' . • i / . i - .J '... • ' -7-1- ''' - .-.- i : • — 1, AL:„•_ - i 1 • MUM 3 / 11 La• ,-.1.■.--■--....- 7 .... . ! I. 1 a ■ - r r• •,.. •411 1 ej , i._. .fi* i 11 , `. ---", ...,__ ... ; .... 13 L.-:-:' L _...-. 1 i , 1 i i• I. rl-i • 1 • • it:. t 2 .7.:" Neinwat i i :.., "17---7 1,...„ I... ..., 1 ..", ! ' . 4 ' ••.--.. . . ; S.M.. 1 Zo...■■ ,■:: ‘. ILLt ll ( N. \■''').1 , \) , 1.1 ■■■■ T •■•■,....... \,....;:s.L.....„)........ e)N, '.4,.. \ ‘. .....L........„.... :', On .M.N...q/1. i t , •- , , 3 x ii ••. ,-; t-,.c 4il ri .y.. .i'.vr• i l 4 . l,....;. , 1 r : n 'Nil . . i .. 1.. ; •,= ,.... .. ,.. I . I , • L 1 r • -10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 3.4 es'. ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 0 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 Wes 1: 300,000 ..„ •.) • ele lb* eb ttt ‘b. 3.5.1-10 1/90 4.0 vtiC— .0 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ,FIGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 3,2 •! 3.3 e.,!\ • ! ' '■••••.=:\ i • eTtI( ' • . • ,C) ;• • -•• • h / 1 .\ . ■ / ftaaa :* • I 0 • .0 jEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 0 1 2 3 gt 5 6 7 8 Mlles 1: 300,000 t,elf L., N.' N/P 3.5.1-13 '.-" ".• ,; 1� -3,; p L =a.40 I I,7 ,,CSC = 0.002 6 t\ v,vZ p2 : .z.0 Z t t 0, yz. (d. oz. 4 160' (o .004 b )'1 n So k= yz V =3,74( T =LIV Tt= 7,,4lm;n 7o q83 ao8 70 V3.71 go = 0.3 M01 is DrO,�s PI. .�s. L, = Id 72, = 0.12- (0.1„c iv)' s 2_r (o.cf)'l Aoor L3 z 3 0 TS = (o.lt 3o) 2 (0,007)1q Sy r .. J • 14 = 80 0.o3t t y o.41_(,0114e ( 'K 2�r (, o36). -I V;k S=. 0,005 Y` 1,13 7'r Is 1, 5 7-- ' 1,36 ";i1 6.23 Z' ce W. 6 J U 0 O; CO of W_ J CO U- W o gQ U � I I- in z1._. • o z 1- W 2 U o; OU WW H U lllZ, U = m . 0 I---- (1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S.C.S. TYPE -1A DISTRIBUTION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** 2 -YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * * ** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. * * * * * * * ** PRE ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1.1,88,.6,98,7.4 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.7 1.1 88.0 .6 98.0 7.4 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) .54 7.83 7717 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c: \p98382.ext POST w/ ROOF ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .2,78,1.5,98,12.17 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.7 .2 78.0 1.5 98.0 12.2 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .67 7.83 10003 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c: \o98382.ext POST w/o ROOF ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 3 .2,78,1,98,12.17 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.2 .2 78.0 1.0 98.0 12.2 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .45 7.83 6785 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c :\r98382.ext ' Z H g; U0' co 0 W =: 1-- co u) 0, g co Z� 1-0 Z t— UD 0— 0 I- wu U Z. w - =,. V G_ ?e? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S.C.S. TYPE -IA DISTRIBUTION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** 10 -YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * * ** 2.90" TOTAL PRECIP. * * * * * * * ** PRE ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1.1,88,0.6,98,7.4 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.7 1.1 88.0 .6 98.0 7.4 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) .91 7.83 12716 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c: \p98383.ext POST w/ ROOF ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .2,78,1.5,98,12.17 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.7 .2 78.0 1.5 98.0 12.2 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) 1.02 7:83 15284 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c: \o98383.ext POST w/o ROOF ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 3 .2,78,1,98,12.17 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.2 .2 78.0 1.0 98.0 12.2 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) .69 7.83 10445 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c:\r98383.ext Z w cc 2 J 0 W =: J I' w O. g J. LL < = a. Z� I— O Z w U• 0 O I— W LU IVs LL I - O 11• Z. O Z * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** S.C.S. TYPE -1A DISTRIBUTION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** 100 -YEAR 24 -HOUR STORM * * ** 4.00" TOTAL PRECIP. * * * * * * * ** PRE ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 1.1,88,0.6,98,7.4 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.7 1.1 88.0 .6 98.0 7.4 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) 1.38 7.83 19094 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c: \p98384.ext POST w/ ROOF ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .2,78,1.5,98,12.17 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.7 .2 78.0 1.5 98.0 12.2 PEAK- Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) 1.45 7.83 21850 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c: \o98384.ext POST w/o ROOF ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 3 .2,78,1,98,12.17 DATA PRINT -OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1.2 .278.0 1.098.0 12.2 PEAK - Q(CFS) T- PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU -FT) .99 7.83 15022 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: c:\r98384.ext Z H• Z. 1'8 N 0. w= W• O• .. u_ =d I- =. Z� 1- O' Z 2 n 0 0 1- W W _ Z LLi • 2' O ~' Z N f- .-. C ..m � O) a) 1 8.04218431 1 6.74824541 5.90419071 1 5.30247681 1 4.48937251 1 3.95568751 1 3.49241781 8.11065021 N a) co co CD 6.00591161 5.41096671 14.60296441 4.06863411 CA Co O) O COO CO Length L (ft) 86.96486 121.3988 co 1 87 87 c 87 87 L8 1 121.3988 1 121.3988 1 121.3988 121.3988 121.3988 121.3988 121.3988 Od�'� LL Q (cfs) 0 0 CCOOCD O O - T o))N T CO 4.84 7.24 L.0 0 0) 0 1.43 0)COCr))� T CO d' N: c p 0.16 0.22 C T- 0 T N 0 0.25 I- N 0 Nf- CO 0 CO 0 N d: 0 0.25 1 0 CO O 0.34 1 N- CO 0 0.44 0.50 0.56 I M's Constant' = 05£'0 05£'0 CO O Cr) CO O CCOO O CO O 0.350 1 CO O CO CCOO O Cr) O 0.350 Cr) O Cr) CO O 0.350 0.350 0.350 CD 0(n T N 00 0 0 0.01 T T T.- T 00000 O O O O O 0.01 0.02 N N N 000 O O O 0.02 0.02 0.02 Bottom Width b (ft) 10.2 7.0 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Depth of Water Y 0.25 0.25 COO O 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.25 CCOOdO.'L.0CCOO O O O O 0.80 1.00 1.25 Side Slope z 3 3 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO •: �� .. >'. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 4.3.3B AVERAGE VELOCITIES FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL TIME FOR OVERLAND FLOW* *For use with the Rational Method only; From Soil Conservation Service, Tech. Release No. 55, January 1975 0 0 'Cr 00 O N 0 PJ 0 0 C) N O O O 00000 O 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O 00 N • } i t i • } i • { I I i i I ♦..: i :......... ► �a•;,... .. ...;.,.. ... .. .i.. (41 .. ......1 aa� ' .. -. . S`, tLal aay ` A } i • .. ..... \ p L..∎..;..J" .44 pa .... SSA .. did;` I � 42..ice ... .. • i I i N.....: } /f a ., ,7 • : SSE' • s10 p� .. i... II } } ... . 4. 1 • l I .I \p \' ti Ss I I I I I , I I O N O 0 O00 O • : 0 0 0 (,,u) ado asIno01ate,', O O O 0 0 O 0 vr T t1') O 0 M 0 Velocity (ft /sec) pv6- s /2-7- 4.3.3-6 1/90 : :$ '''• KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL Infiltration facilities must be designed based on infiltration testing and a soils report prepared by a professional civil engineer with expertise in soil engineering. To maintain outflow rates of the infiltration tanks and ponds, all inflow must be pretreated for sediment removal (see Section 5.4). An emergency overflow path must be identified for infiltration facilities and noted on the engineering plan. This overflow path must be analyzed to meet the requirements of Core Requirements #1 (see Section 1.2.1) and #2 (see Section 1.2.2) for the 100 -year, 24 -hour duration design storm, except Downspout Infiltration Systems (see Section 4.5.1). Infiltration facilities may be especially useful in the following circumstances, provided the proper soil conditions are present and all requirements can be met. = H ~w re 2 6 (2) The proposed project discharges to a severely undersized conveyance system that U O restricts the runoff volume that can be accommodated. : co w J i- H Ow Exemptions From On -Site Peak Rate Runoff Control w O On -site peak rate runoff control will not be required for a proposed project in the following Q situations. c =w Negligible Peak Runoff Rate Increase': F' _ z� I— O zI- w w U0 O92 o I—! w w. Direct Discharge: The proposed project will discharge surface and stormwater runoff without on- i �-O Wz U N H= 0 (1) The proposed project discharges to a closed depression. (3) The proposed project is in a Critical Drainage Area requiring runoff volume control. (1) The proposed project site post- developed peak runoff rate for the 100 -year, 24 -hour duration design storm event is calculated for each discharge location' to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions; OR, (2) The project proposes to construct 5,000 square feet, or less, of new impervious surface. site peak rate runoff control directly to: A Regional Facility. Direct discharge of surface and stormwater runoff to a regional facility will be allowed if: o the facility has been demonstrated to adequately control the proposed project's increased peak rate of runoff by an adopted King County basin plan or by a detailed drainage analysis approved by the SWM Division; AND o the facility will be available by the time of construction of the project; AND o the conveyance system to the regional facility can accommodate, with no significant adverse impact to the drainage systems, the design peak runoff for the proposed project site and the equivalent area' developed to the full zoning potential. ' Proposed projects in adopted critical drainage areas, basin plans and community plans requiring peak runoff rate or runoff volume controls more strict than standard controls shall not qualify for this exemption. ' A threshold discharge area is an on -site area which drains to a single natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within 1/4-mile downstream. 9 The equivalent area is the area tributary to the receiving water body equal to or Tess than the shortest, straight line distance from the discharge point from the receiving water body (or regional facility) to the furthermost point of the proposed development. 1.2.3 -5 • • . . 11/94 z KING CdUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ditches or channels must be demonstrated to convey the peak runoff from the 100 -year design storm without overtopping. Surcharged conditions for pipe systems and culverts, and bank -full conditions for existing open ditches and channels are acceptable for demonstrating the adequacy of the conveyance system to convey the peak runoff for the 100 -year design storm provided that: (1) runoff is contained within defined conveyance system elements without inundating or overtopping the crown of a roadway; AND /OR (2) no portions of a building will be flooded; AND /OR z ii— (3) if overland sheet flow occurs, it will flow through a drainage easement or covenant. H W IX The downstream conveyance system must be analyzed as required in Section 1.2.2, Core Requirement #2: Off -site Analysis. UO O Composition w L Conveyance systems shall be constructed of vegetation -lined channels, as o 1 U) u- systems, where feasible. Vegetative channels shall generally be considered feasible if: (1) the O channel gradient generally does not exceed five percent, (2) no modifications to currently adopted g. standard roadway cross sections in the King County Road Standards are necessitated by the channel, AND (3) the channel would be accessible for maintenance (see Section 1.2.6). co a Bridges H w z1- Bridges shall be designed to pass the 100 -year runoff (estimated for facilities without continuous flow /frequency records by using the peak runoff for the 100 -year design storm) with the clearance z O as specified in Section 4.3.5. IA Lu D 0 Pump System v 0— 0F_ Pump systems (includes the pumps, force mains, electrical equipment, structures and z ILI U. appurtenances) are not allowed on storm drainage systems in King County. A variance (see Section 1.4) from this requirement, which will usually also require a variance from Core O' Requirement #1: Discharge at the Natural Location in Section 1.2.1, may be requested. Any pump Z system will be required to meet the following minimum conditions: w U =' O I- (1) The pump system is not used to circumvent any other King County drainage requirements, and construction and operation of the pump system will not violate any other King County requirements. (2) The pump system is the only alternative to solve a flooding problem impacting • • existing residential or commercial structures or prohibiting reasonable access. (3) The pump system has a storage facility (pond, tank, or vault), sized to hold 25 percent of the total volume of runoff for the developed tributary drainage area for the 2 -year, 24 -hour duration design storm event. This storage requirement is in addition to any peak rate runoff control requirements. (4) The pump system has a dual pump (alternating) provided with an external alarm system. (5) Pump systems that serve commercial projects or single - family homes must be maintained by the property owner(s). (6) Pump systems serving more than one property must be granted in an easement to, and operated and maintained by King County. Prior to engineering plan approval for these pump systems, a fee must be paid to the SWM Division equal to the capital replacement costs for the pump systems mechanical and electrical components. 1.2.4 -2 z • pv6- VAVLr PRoPvs�p: aO' OX 3,e-11 2720 CF K( N6- CoQIm 2E:G2viOg5 2SZ Cr Tor-44 2( VVoFF RA_ I)zt'A7LoPF40 TQ(lSvr{i-a) 04»)0)-6-tr 9- Fo%L Syr -�-y1r S1'okm t-v►vf. M-SS U f11.= Rbc F p jA-1 Iv 15 evoT it/RD Fog TH IS 4l/0 aa-ao o-t, frn/J' Roar pQAIivS S7iZThGMT to cITy 1-111/E. VQLvmE 14//0 d,00P 67$- CF X 5 7 7=7> 1616 CF> ').720 CIF IF Qno F VOLu niz- rvAS lvgg.D 70 13� \ ot- u('U I /200F = (0003 2570 V'O I CF > 2,920 CP z z v o. wo L11 Wo -J =�a W Z= 1-o z F- 0 I—' W uj 0 ..z w I. O 1- APPENDIX H: TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS J U! U 0; U Q cA W W =, H LL. LL Q = W Z 0`. Z 1-: w, O • N 20 — 0'. Z. U � H F O , Z IV_ . f �d 3v 1.2,3 � o 144-C C w11--a-k ))473 r6-1V rri, tv'/1- %, TF & w i LL ' ,Q cu7c =17 v f3- Sf v , . c c, k 044=C le 4, Pis M/D S iv ftL43 / 11/1-4::: 1' /6- AIL= C I Y S z J 0O' t Q: LU UJ J I-. V) Li_ WO g Q w Q: Z Z I; Z 0. W 'O N! rQI-�' W w' O ..Z W. C 0'— O APPENDIX I: SOILS REPORT W 6 J U: 0 o w: W= J W O: LLQ = w z�.,, 0 z� W W ❑? O - 0 I-` X cy 0 co Z C�!y GILES Atlanta, GA • Dallas, TX • Los Angeles, CA • Madison, WI • Milwaukee. WI • Seattle, WA • Washington. D.C. Fiorillo Northwest P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166 -0826 ENGINEERING HSSOCIATES, INC. 61g GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS Attention: Mr. John McKenna June 16, 1998 Subject: Limited Subsurface Exploration and Engineering Evaluation Proposed New Downtown Harley Davidson 13001 - 48th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Project No. 6G- 9805006 1I11. .l 1 '' ∎.1 • Dear Mr. McKenna: This letter presents the results of our limited subsurface exploration and engineering evaluation for the proposed new Downtown Harley Davidson project in Tukwila, Washington. Your authorization for our services was provided during our May 5, 1998 telephone conversation. This letter is intended to provide specific recommendations as they relate to proposed new pavement design and building expansion foundation design for the proposed new Harley Davidson project in Tukwila, Washington. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering. practice for the exclusive use of Fiorillo Northwest and their agents for specific application to this project. Should the nature or design of this project change, we should be allowed to review and modify the recommendations of this letter and provide alternate recommendations, if appropriate. PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand that the Downtown Harley Davidson intends upon developing a new store located at 13001 - 48th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The property is that of a former brick manufacturing facility located on the north side of 48th Avenue South. The property fronts some 250 feet along the north side of 48th Avenue South and extends some 290 feet to the north. At the time of this writing, the site was occupied by an existing abandoned steel- framed building which is located to the eastern side of the site. The building measures some 90 feet in the east -west by 175 feet in the north - south direction. The interior of the building was vacant and, with the exception of the concrete pad - supported steel - framing. of the building, had no floor slab. The remainder of the site was covered with broken brick, reddish clay, and some asphalt pavement. The existing building covers a total of some 16,000 square feet and has a finished floor elevation of approximately 11.5 feet. Development plans call for the reconditioning of the existing steel building to provide showroom, maintenance, and warehouse facilities for the new Downtown Harley Davidson store. An approximate 1,600 square foot expansion would be provided on the west side of the building. The 11807 North Creek Parkway South • Suite 102 • Bothell, WA 98011 425/482.2020 • Fax 425/482 -6300 • E -Mail seattle ®gilesengr.com z UO • LLI H CO w w0 ga rn� =a. Z I— o Z ~' w U 0 O (.2 :0 1` S U'. LI Z L U c.. 0 z : Fiorillo Northwest Project No. 6G- 9805006 June 16, 1998 Paget GILES ENGINEERING (ASSOCIATES, INC. remainder of the site would be paved with asphalt - covered parking lots, delivery and access driveways, with the northern some 90 feet of the project set aside for a Loading zone and proposed future buildinz area. One should refer to the enclosed Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1, for existing building configuration and location, and the proposed development. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION On May 6, 1998, we visited the proposed Downtown Harley Davidson site to review the excavation of test pits. The test pits were excavated using a track- mounted backhoe prior to our arrival on site. The test pits were open upon arrival and were provided with entry steps for access to review subsurface conditions in the trench side walls. We reviewed existing soil conditions exposed in the side walls including the performance of pocket penetration tests in both intact materials in the trench side walls, as well as blocks of material excavated from the trench and deposited in the spoils piles. The test pit locations are shown on the attached Site and Exploration Plan. The test pits all extended from a depth of 8 to 10 feet below the existing ground surface. In general, all four of the test pits encountered a near- surface laver of man - placed fill consisting primarily of broken bricks or the red clay used to manufacture bricks. This fill layer extended to a depth of from 1 to 1.5 feet in test pits TP -1. TP -2, and TP -3. In test pit TP -4, however, the red brick material was underlain by a loose silty sand fill to a depth of approximately 4 feet below the ground surface. In general, the subsurface conditions encountered below the surficial fill layer consisted primarily of a layer of medium -stiff to stiff silty clay with trace to some sand extending to a depth of approximately 6 to 7 feet below the existing ground surface. These materials were in turn underlain by a loose to medium -dense silty fine sand to the full depth explored. Pocket penetrometer readings taken within the upper medium -stiff clayey silt/silty clay indicated penetration resistance ranging from 1 to 4 tsf. With depth, the penetration resistance decreased to 1 to 3 tsf. One should refer to the test pit logs enclosed at the end of this report for specific subsurface conditions encountered at each of the test pit locations. During the review of the test pits, we observed slight seepage in test pits TP -1 and TP -2 at a depth of approximately 9 feet. Some caving was observed in both of these test pits beginning at a depth of approximately 8 feet. The groundwater observed in the two test pits was emanating from the loose silty fine sand layer encountered at the bottom of the test pits. Considering the proximity of the Duwamish River, it is anticipated that groundwater levels at the site would be at or slightly above the elevation of the Duwamish River. Based on existing topography indicated on the site plan provided us, groundwater elevations are anticipated to be at approximately elevation 2 feet. Groundwater levels should be expected to fluctuate not only with season and precipitation, but also with the influence of the adjacent Duwamish River. RECOMMENDATIONS We understand that proposed development will include the remodeling of the existing steel building occupying the site, the construction of an approximate 1,600- square -foot single -story expansion on the west side of this building, and the placement of asphaltic parking lots, access driveways, and loading zones. We understand that the existing steel building is supported on conventional spread • Fiorillo Northwest Project No. 6G- 9805006 June 16, 1998 Page 3 GILES ENGINEERING (9SSOCIATES, INC. footings. The depth and bearing pressure design of the existing foundations are, however, unknown. Considering the existing grade of the site is nearly flat, we anticipate that only minor cuts and fills will be required to provide subgrades for pavements. The purpose of this letter is to provide specific recommendations for the foundation construction of the proposed building expansion and parking lot, access driveway, and delivery route pavement design recommendations. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and understanding that the existing building is supported on conventional spread footings, it is our opinion that the proposed expansion can be supported on conventional concrete spread footings within the design parameters presented in this letter. Considering the near - surface accumulations of man - placed fill and brick fragments, some remedial improvement of foundations, as well as pavement suberade, should be anticipated. One should refer to the Site and Exploration Plan and test pit logs enclosed with this letter for specific site information and subsurface conditions. Foundation Design The proposed 1,600 - square -foot expansion can be supported on conventional spread footings. The footings should be extended through existing near - surface fills. Test pit TP -1, which 'was located adjacent to the proposed expansion, encountered approximately 1 foot of man - placed fills overlying a stiff to very stiff silty clay /clayey silt material which extended to a depth of approximately 10 feet below the ground surface. The penetrometer results of the upper 6 feet of these materials indicated resistance is on the order of 3 to 4 tons per square foot. In our opinion, the expansion could be supported on conventional spread and continuous wall footings extending a minimum of 1 foot into the underlying stiff to very stiff native materials (at least 2 feet below existing grade) designed with a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. The soil bearing pressure may be increased by one -third to accommodate seismic and transient loads. If soft subgrade conditions or existing fills are encountered at the base of the excavation, it would be necessary to overexcavate and replace these soft materials with properly compacted structural fill, controlled density fill (CDF), or quarry spall materials. We are available to provide foundation observation services as required to verify that soil conditions are consistent with those assumed in design. Should adverse or unforeseen conditions be encountered in footing excavations, it may be necessary to modify the foundation design as appropriate to account for these conditions. Provided the foundations are supported on at least stiff undisturbed native soils beneath the near - surface fill, with the recommended bearing pressure presented above, long -term settlements on the order of 1 inch with differential settlements on the order of % inch should be expected for the addition. The estimated settlements are a function of not only subgrade conditions available at the site, but also adequacy of contractor care during excavation and subgrade protection. The excavation should be clear of all loose, soft and disturbed materials and accumulations of water prior to reinforcing steel and concrete placement. Q • z w 6 0 0 0 co 0 = J , �w w 0'. uQ =a w Z= 1— 0 Z I- � • o .0 Oco w • w` I- n_ z ui = • O z Fiorillo Northwest Project No. 6G-9805006 June 16, 1998 Page 4 GILES ENGINEERING HSSOCIATES, INC. Slab -on -grade floor slabs could be provided for the proposed expansion provided the subgrade consists of either stiff native soils or properly compacted structural fill placed above stiff native soils. We recommend that the existing fill soils underlying the expansion area be removed and replaced with properly compacted structural fill compacted to a minimum 90 percent of the ASTM:D-1557 test procedure. Care should be exercised by the contractor when stripping and preparing native silty and clayey subgrades. These materials are highly moisture sensitive and susceptible to disturbance, especially when wet. It may be necessary to employ a layer of structural fill consisting of crushed rock or quarry ry spalls to p protect subgrades from vehicular traffic. It may also be necessary to selectively overexcavate and replace soft subgrades to achieve suitable subgrades prior to concrete or fill placement. During adverse weather conditions, a separation fabric, such as Mirafi 500X, may be necessary to separate new fills from existing silty or clayey subgrades. We are available to provide construction observation services as required. Pavement Design Recommendations It must be recognized that pavement design is a compromise between high initial cost and little maintenance versus low initial cost coupled with the need for periodic repairs. As a result, the owner will need to take part in the development of an appropriate pavement section. Critical features which govern the durability of the surface include the stability of the subgrade soils, the traffic volume, and the frequency of use by heavy vehicles. The recommended pavement designs are based on an assumed traffic loading of about 500 automobiles and four trucks per day for light -duty parking and driveways, and about six trucks per day for truck drives, for a 20-year design period. We recommend that these assumptions be confirmed by the owner or designers prior to implementing the following pavement recommendations. Sub rade Subgrade preparation should consist initially of the excavation to design subgrade elevation. The exposed subgrade should then be proofrolled with a loaded dump truck to detect loose or soft areas. Any soft areas observed during proofrolling should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. Structural fill should consist of pit -run sand and gravel or other suitable, free- draining granular material. Fills should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM:D -1557 test procedure. After subgrade preparation and proofrolling, the subgrade soils are anticipated to consist of either stripped native silty clay /clayey silt, existing fill, or new structural fill over a suitable subgrade. The silty /clayey soils are considered to be a poor subgrade material for pavement support, with an estimated field CBR value of 5 for subgrade soil with a USCS classification of ML /CL. Due to the moisture sensitivity of the silty /clayey soils, a CBR value of 5 was used for design. Use of this CBR value assumes that all fill added to the site to raise grades is similar or superior to the on -site soils and has been placed and compacted to 95 percent compaction in accordance with the recommendations in this report. If persistent soft subgrade conditions occur or development is planned for the winter months, we recommend the use of geotextile separation fabric to facilitate construction. We recommend the use of Mirafi 600X or equivalent be used below the design pavement sections. IEXPIRES 11/20/ L1$ ! Fiorillo Northwest Project No. 6G- 9805006 June 16, 1998 Page W GILES ENGINEERING HSSOCIATES, INC. The following table presents the recommended pavement sections. If heavy truck traffic cannot be limited to specific truck drive areas, the entire pavement is recommended to consist of the truck drive pavement section presented in the table. Other pavement section materials may be used, but probably will require a section thickness adjustment. Recommendations for alternate pavement sections can be provided in an addendum report if desired. The appropriate WSDOT specifications are presented so that proper materials and construction procedures are used. Pavement Section Thickness (in.) Automobile Truck Traffic Traffic The recommended pavement sections summarized above are based on assumed traffic loadings. Pavement design recommendations assume proper drainage and construction observation and are based on AASHTO design parameters for a 20 -year design period. However, continual flexible as pavement maintenance along with a major rehabilitation after about _8 to 10 ected to obtain a 20 -year service Iife. years should be expected CONCLUSIONS Conclusions and recommendations contained in this letter are specifically for foundation design for the proposed expansion of the existing building and pavement design parameters. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project. We are available to provide construction observation and testing services as required. Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCLkT S,,. INC. urt D. i errtman, P.E. Senior Project Manager A John E. Zipper, P.E. Regional Manager Enclosures: Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1 . Test Pit Logs TP -1 through TP -4 Kurt16G- 9805006ncg • NORTH TP -2 TP -4 Q TP -1 PROPOSED ADDITION TP -3 Q EXISTING BUILDING • 48' AVENUE SOUTH = TP -4 TEST NT NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN PROPOSED DOWNTOWN HARLEY-DAVIDSON 13001 48' AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE WASHINGTON 6G- 9805006 SCALE 1" = 50' JUNE 15, 1998 GILES ENGINEERING HSSOCIATES, INC. 4. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC 11807 North Creek south, Suite 102, Bothell, Washington (425) 482 -2020, (425) 482 -6300 RECORD OF TEST PIT EXPLORATION Test Pit TP -1 Location: 95 ft. north, 45 ft. west of SW Building corner. Approximate ground surface elevation (ft): 11 Project: Downtown Harley Davidson Project No: 6G- 9805006 Date Excavated: May 6, 1998 Depth (ft) 1 Material Description Nc Sample Testing 10 Loose, brick fragment and red clay . FiIl Stiff to very stiff, moist to wet, wet with some iron oxide staining (FeOX), silty CLAY /clayey SILT. Massive. Loose to medium stiff, wet, gray, silty fineSA.ND /fine sandy SILT. Trace of clay. Massive. Test pit sides are caving between 8ft and loft. Light groundwater seepage. Test pit TP -1 terminated at 10 feet. ,1 Pocket Penetrometer 3.0 - 4.0TSF Pocket Penotremeter 1.0 - 2.OTSF 8 9 10 .:. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC 11807 North Creek Parkway South, Suite 102, Bothell, Washington (425) 482 -2020, (425) 482 -6300 (FAX) RECORD OF TEST NT EXPLORATIONS Depth (ft) 1 2 3 Test Pit TP -2 Location: 40ft east, 50ft south of NW Property corner. Approximate ground surface elevation (ft): 12 Material Description Medium stiff, moist to wet, gray, lean CLAY. Bricks and roots. (FILL) Relic topsoil zone with tree roots up to 1/2 inch diameter. Medium stiff, wet, dark gray, silty CLAY /clayey SILT. Trace of fine sand. Massive. Project: Downtown Harley Davidson Project No: 6G- 9805006 Date Excavated: May 6, 1998 Nc Sample 1 Testing Pocket Penetrometer 1.5 - 2.5TSF 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Loose, wet, brown, silty fine SAND /fine sandy SILT. Test pit sides are caving between 8 and 10 feet. Groundwater seepage at 9 feet. Test pit TP -2 terminated at 10 feet. 4 Pocket Penetrometer 0.5 - 2.5TSF 5 7 Pocket Penotremeter 0.5 - 1.STSF 9 10 •` tiji,i S ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC 11807 North Creek Parkway South, Suite 102, Bothell, Washington (425) 482 -2020, (425) 482 -6300 (FAX) RECORD OF TEST PIT EXPLORATIONS Test Pit TP -3 Location: 45ft west, 75ft south of NE Property corner. Approximate ground surface elevation (ft): 12 Depth (ft) Material Description Project: Downtown Harley Davidson Project No: 6G- 9805006 Date Excavated: May 6, 1998 Nc Sample Testing 10 Medium stiff, moist to wet, red, pottery CLAY. (FILL) Medium stiff, moist to wet, gray, lean CLAY. Medium stiff, wet, gray, silty CLAY /clayey SILT. Loose, moist to wet, brown. silty fine SAND. Pocket Penetrometer 2.5 - 3.0TSF Pocket Penetrometer 3.5TSF Pocket Penetrometer 2.0TSF Pocket Penetrometer 2.0TSF Pocket Penotremeter 1.0 - 1.5TSF Test pit TP -3 terminated at 10 feet. No groundwater seepage encountered. No caving of test pit sides observed 10 v Depth (ft) 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCrTES, INC 11807 North Creek Parkway South, Suite 102, Bothell, Washington (425) 482 -2020, (425) 482 -6300 (FAX) CORD OF TEST PIT EXPT ORATIONS Test Pit TP-4 Location: 30ft east, 20fr north of SW Property corner. Approximate ground surface elevation (ft): 12 Material Description Project: Downtown Harley Davidson Project No 6G- 9805006 Date Exca`ated: May 6, 1998 N Sample Testing Loose, moist, brown, silty, fine to medium SAND. (FILL) Metal strips and roots to 1 inch in diameter. Relic topsoil at 4 feet. Loose, moist to wet, brown, silty fine SAND. Pocket Penotremeter 1.5TSF medium stiff, wet, gray, clayey SILT /silty CLAY. Trace to some fine sand. Test pit TP-4 terminated at 8 feet. No groundwater seepage encountered. No caving of test pit sides observed Pocket Penetrometer 1.5 - 2.5 TSF Z ~w JU UO w= t- CO LL w O LLa =• a Fw Z= I— 0 Z H` ui U0 O N O I- I w, LL Z al UN H I. O Z DBM CONSULTING ENGINEERS CI \'IL I ?NGINGI3RING DESIGN • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING GNVIRONn1ENTA1. SERVICES August 21, 1998 Ms. Kelcie Peterson City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 FIECENED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 1 1998 PERMIT CENTER RE: Design Review Application for Property Located at 13001 48th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. Our Job No. 9838. Dear Ms. Peterson: On behalf of Downtown Harley- Davidson, DBM Consulting Engineers submits the enclosed design review application for the property as noted above. Per the pre- application meeting held on June 18, 1998 ( #PRE98- 034), we are submitting documents and plans in accordance with the City of Tukwila's codes and regulations. Please review the following documents: 1. Application checklist 1 copy. Design review application - 4 copies. Check in the amount of $900.00 for the design review Environmental checklist (SEPA) - 6 copies. Check in the amount of $325.00 for the environmental checklist review Technical information report (TIR) — 6 copies. Vicinity map 6 copies. Surrounding area map — 6 copies. Site plan - 6 copies. 10. Civil engineering plans — 6 copies. 502 16T11 STREET • NORTHEAST•SUITE 312 • AUBURN, WAS111NGTON• 98002 PFIONL• (253) .887 -0924 • FAX (253) 887 -0925 -2— 11. Landscaping /planting plan — 6 copies. 12. Building elevations — 6 copies. 13. Signage per Sign Code. 14. Reduction (8 '/2" x 11") of each of the above plans. 15. Colors and materials sample board. 16. Applicant's response to design review criteria. Please begin the design review for this project as soon as possible. If you have any questions or need any additional documentation, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully, August 21, 1998 DBM :rm Enclosure: Design Review Submittal Application Check in the amount of $900.00 Check in the amount of $325.00 Roberta L. Marta Project Planner 502 16TH STREET NORTHEAST•SUITE 312 • AUBURN, WASHINGTON. 98002 PHONE (253) 887 -0924 • FAX (253) 887 -0925 w 6 -J C.) o 0; co o. cnw w =. w: w 0' g -i D. a = w. Z 1- 0 Z 1- LU 2 iU Lu Uw y O Z CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 DESIGN REVIEW (P -DR) FOR STAFF USE ONLY .Planner' •Receipt:■umber File Kum d D: Application Compiete (Date Project Flle'# 1:17.AP0116atioh.InCosinPlete SEPA;File # Shoreline File #.. A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Harley- Davidson B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision; or fax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection; if proposal applies to several properties, list the streets bounding the area.), 13001 48th Avenue South in Tukwila. Assessor Account #000300 -0046. Quarter: NE Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 04 (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Dana Mower, DBM Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 50 PHONE: SIGNATURE: (2 1 6th S e t NE, Suite 312, Auburn, Washington 98002 DATE: $ L j / g. Algal RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 1 1998 PERMIT CENTER D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoin.g statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at 4,4-Met— (city), IN4 st S T, �l (state), on Av0v , 199 g_ eVoSC4-1.- r n 19 Litei (Print Name) tv � �7 vl41-e W (Address) (2 l — 04 57 S I )4 eilt, • N m b. r) (Signature) CITRECEIVED ILA AUG 2 1 1998 PERMIT CENTER Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. , � _ OAW 1908 August 4, 1998 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Work Ross A. Earnst, P. E, Director Mr. Brent Jacobsen Fiorillo Northwest P.O. Box 66826 Seattle, WA 98166 -0826 A P::) O \/ F D AUG 5 1998 1 C ^ CODE l,4✓ i' Subject: Sewer and Water Availability pertaining to 13011 48th Ave. South Dear Mr. Jacobsen: Water and sewer are currently available for the above - referenced location. The water system consists of a 12 -inch main on 48th Ave. South with a static pressure of 150 psi. The sewer system is a 12 -inch line that connects to the Metro Interurban Interceptor. There are no water or sewer deficiencies identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area. All lines currently meet State regulations for capacity and fire flow. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 433 -0179 ext 1638. Sincerely, Ott Pat Brodin, P.E. Water /Sewer Engineer PB:ad PB:C :\MSOFFICE WINWORD\AVAIL.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433 -0179 • Fax (206) 431-3665 +. Holopbane Wallpack® Series, and Wallpackette® Choice of lamp types and 'ittages Wall - mounted Wi i espread distribution ..1..;::.::.• :..fl'- - L,..,.i, is ;.- _u....�:ri..:.' :,.u' -c :: ;.:: Wallpack III Wallpack II A Wallpackette Applications Perimeter lighting Parking garages Underpasses Tunnels Industrial facilities Security Loading docks Features Heavy duty, low copper cast aluminum housing Thermal shock resistant prismatic glass Two position adjustable optics (Wallpack II) 60% CU for Wallpack II Wide choice in HID and incandescent lamps Lamps 35W low pressure sodium 35, 50, 70, 100, 150, 250, 400W HPS, medium base (35,50W uses mogul base in WP2) 100, 175, 250, 400W metal halide or mercury 150, 200, 300W incandescent UL Listed 1572, wet location CSA Certified Universe Collection decorative &. Functi:onal Lu X The Universe Collection is compli.,• of decorative, functional luminaires th•, scend architectural styles past and prcu•iii Four families of fixtures, in multiple .i„ and mounting arrangements, offer an ext,.i, palette of forms. Choose from small wall In,, ets to pedestrian scaled pole mounted luminaires to the larger, high wattage lizun� suitable for streetscapes. Many styles are available using AA! performance reflector systems for ells mination without glare. AAL's extensive collection of deer ;un, arms and poles gives you unlimited clesitiu options with the Universe Collection. A '.1= line of '..' for site binatk HEAD 2- SLFHW22 SLSR24G3 REFLECTOR H2 -H5 1-12 -H5 LAMP WATTAGE 70 -175 70 -175 ARM SLA20A -2 SLA7 BASE /POLE DB6 -4R14 PR4 -4R16 OPTION SHOWN • BC2-4(BAsE COVER) SHFH32 -PM 2- SLSHW20 ALL0502H5 • V3, V5 H2 -H5 70 -250 70 -175 70 -175 • SLA20C -2 SLA4 PR5 -5R18 DB6 -4R15 PR4 -4R14 BC1 -5 • • SLSR30 SLFHW22 S. 116 • H2 -H5 • _ 70 -250 70 -175 50- `- SSA WMA8 C ". — PR5-5R20 • • BC5-5 • •— * )lete fat that trap. resent iple sizes to extenshr wall brack- :d e fixtures ►AL's high Tective illu• 's ,corative design AAL manufactures an extensive line of contemporary fixture designs for site lighting projects. Many com- binations of lenses and AAL reflector • stems are available for balancing .thetic and illumination i cquirements. Shown below are examples of some of the AAL contemporary fix- ture designs. All pole mounted fixtures can be wall mounted with complimentary arm brackets. :SLSR16 • 5700 CA • • t1 SLVTL ALB14 -4HG HEAD SLBBL22 SLVT H3 M2XA SLPL24 -30 REFLECTOR H2 -H5, V3, V5 H2 -H5 H2 -H5 70 -175 70 -175 70 -175 SLA18 SLA22 • • 'E /POLE DB6 -4R14 PR5 -5R16 PR4 -4R18 PR4 -4R14 DB6 -4F12 OPTION SHOWN • BC5 -5 • • LAMP WATTAGE 70 -250 SLCS18 V3, V5 70 -175 M1P • BC2 -4 BBD4 -18 BANNER ARMS H2 -H5 150 -400 • PR5 -5818 • • • 70 -175 50 -70 WMA22U WMA22U • • • • ORDERING EXAMPLE: SLVT• H5 • 100 MH • SLA22 • PR4 -4R14 • BLK 994 -0522 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 14249 ARTESIA BLVD:, LA MIRADA, CA 90638, (714) 994 -2700, FAX (714) 994 =0522 . ? Pole top luminaires . . . with asymmetrical distribution : . Pole top luminaires for parking areas, pedestrian walkways, bicycle paths and open landscape, areas.. Optical system delivers efficient asymmetrical illumination from'H I.D. sources. " The pole cap extension matches the diameter of the recommended cylindrical pole , Matching wall mounted units . are shown on MOMMWOMMEM sum is rAmmumniguma NW QMPOWNIMMI MMEMMEMMAKM MI oisnIMOMOMMIIM ITIMMOMM MMIOINWOMMEN brAMM Mb EINMOIMMMEMOM 2° billibbb ' '12MIIM 15 IMAM MOMMWOMMEM sum is rAmmumniguma sem QMPOWNIMMI MMEMMEMMAKM MI EMMOOMMilii OMM MMMOMWM oisnIMOMOMMIIM EINMOIMMMEMOM ' '12MIIM 15 IMAM MIMI= EWER MEWMIEMWMEMM ZSMIONOMMMEIM MEOW 30 OMM UMMMEMMMKMOIM THIS FRAME IS LESS Pole top luminaires with round symmetrical light distribution. Pole top luminaires with wide beam round. Symmetrical light distribution in two sizes with a choice. of H ,1 D. light sources: Available in single, double and triple. configurations: Luminaires., arms and pole are integrated into a'cohesive unit. These luminaires and poles can be supplied in a variety of colors on special order IL eoV R &. R b. ■ g ■\ MUM .s.9 ROM bob, immump m 25 � annum M MUM= UJOEMMUMMMIEM Z W W JO O 0 cn w F- wO ¢ _ IY J u < (.0� a w Z= I— O Z F- w w O CL• ) 0 F- ww 2 1- U_ 1 O Z W U_ — O H Z Lrel dinar web s eI 47'/. 24V 42'/2 Single pole top luminaire with reinforced' spreader arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D. pole top. Opal glass with screw neck; plastic diffuser also available. Color: Black with inside of reflector painted white. Note: 100W Metal Halide units require ballast location in base of pole. Lamp Lumen 9701S 1 50W E•17 HPS 4000 9701 MH 1 100W E0•17 MH 8500 Poles for 9701 — See page 153 Double pole top luminaire with reinforced spreader arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D. pole top. Opal glass with screw neck; plastic diffuser, also available. Color: Black with inside of reflector painted white. Note: 100W Metal Halide units require ballast location in base of pole. Lamp Lumen 9702S 2 50W E•17 HPS 8000 9702MH 2 .100W E10•17 MH 17000 Poles for 9702 — See page 153 Triple pole top luminaire with reinforced spreader arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D. pole top. Opal glass with screw neck; plastic diffuser also available. Color: Black with inside of reflector painted white. Note: 100W Metal Halide units require ballast location in base of pole. Lamp Lumen 9703S 3 50W E•17 HPS 12000 9703MH 3 100W ED•17 MH 25500 . Poles for 9703 — See page 153 BEGA 141 Pole top luminaires with wide beam light distribution. Pole top luminaires withwidebeam round symmetrical light distribution with excellent glare control. Available in single, double and triple. . `. . . • configurations with a:choice of H.I.D. light sources. Luminaires, arms and poles are integrated into a cohesive unit. These luminaires and poles can be supplied in a variety of colors on special order. Imitionum. 8809 MOIMMOIM ■ ii.S■ ■t►. ■■■■►v■: IIMMIIIMMramMAM ■ RSIIMI■W■P■ M■■cps■■,mom ■II ■►■nun d 'NM MI Mil MI ■■ JEMEAMMIEMEM 142 BEGA, -. 47'/. 23'/, 47'/. 47 Single pole top luminaire with reinforced spreader arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D. pole top. Specular anodized aluminum reflector. Clear tempered glass. Color: Black Note: 100W Metal Halide units require ballast location in base of pole. Lamp Lumen 9801S 1 50W E•17 HPS 4000 9801MH 1 100W ED•17 MH 8500 Poles for 9801 =See page 153 Double pole top luminaire with reinforced spreader arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D, pole top. Specular anodized aluminum reflector. Clear tempered glass. Color: Black Note: 100W Metal Halide units require ballast location in base of pole. Lamp Lumen 9802S 2 50W E•17 HPS 8000 9802MH 2 100W ED•17 MH 17000 Poles for 9802 — See page 153 Triple pole top luminaire with reinforced spreader arm and pole fitter. Slip fits any 3" O.D. pole top. Specular anodized aluminum reflector. Clear tempered glass. Color: Black Note: 100W Metal Halide units require ballast location in base of pole. Lamp Lumen 9803S 3 50W E•17 HPS 12000 9803MH 3 100W ED•17 MH 25500 • Poles for 9803 — See page 153 BEGA 143 . ! ' �+� Pole mounted downlight;luminaires • Downtight luminaires for pole applications in single, double and triple units Rugged die` cast aluminum construction with stainless steel hardware:for maximum • corrosion resistance Fully enclosed and gasketed suitable for wet -locations. These luminaires can be supplied in a variety of colors on Special order., Matching wall mounted units are shown on • .pages 56 and 57. riiMuff 10:710:1 4, Alt ktia• martiti � 842 51M Immo WONOO 441 4. 1362/, 19"116 /EMU 9946 ■■■■■■ e V■mim ' 4■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■11 n. tom 3__511 ■ ■11 Q■f, e l 1111111■ 1111■ MEER 0.2 2 � 02 ma1■firni 111111 2 ■■ I I.s ■■U. ■ ■ ■11■■■ 2 11■ 1111.1111W1111• 1111.1111W1111• ■ ■ WA ■i ■ \ ■ ■ ■■ m •■•••••••■ 1 2 3 /! • Pole top luminaires with ;. high. performance .asymmetrical Tight distribution Pole top luminaires for parking areas. roadways or. open: landscape areas.- Optical system delivers highly efficient asymmetrical illumination from l a.D. light sources with, low glare Single or twin configurations: •7hese.lumineires'can be siipplied in custom colors on special order M alching wall mounted luminaires are shown on pages 60 and 61 • ▪ 215/5 8071 i\ e4• 44tki/ ‘-Non • 300 cWIKYn - •- CI50•C0 C200•C20 - C270.000 Single pole mounted luminaires with shielded light source and internal optical system for asymmetrical light distribution. Die cast aluminum hinged trim with stippled tempered glass and captive socket head stainless steel screws. Slip fits 3" O.D. pole top — pole extension included with luminaire. Color: Black or white. Lamp Lumen 8071S Single 1 100W E•17 HPS 9500 8071MH Single 1 100W ED•17 MH 8500 For compatible poles, see page 153 ° 1_-UK •• ---1- — ....... �3 ?5: C_�—I-_\_ ESNIIIti��� ►��\_► 8072 IMIti 5 - 40m `ti��__ 8071 __ti.9.1ti __IISSOMMIII►- __01111111 - -••- El M"NC�►C iM►C► 2 __.b__ItiI 1 5.80. IIII.III. llitil 111111111. 0 C::��1 40 15 5 2 05 02 01 14 t•V1WI 1 _ alli It. _.... 11=1311 0.2 01 2 ./i./I/III/II_I 111=i1.111" m 0 2 1I /,I AIIIMiOIA IrAWIMUITAIMISM11112111 4 6 5 10 /I VA m 12 14 15 10 20 Twin pole mounted luminaires with shielded light source and internal optical system for asymmetrical light distribution. Die cast aluminum hinged trim with stippled tempered glass and captive socket head stainless steel screws. Slip fits 3:' O.D. pole top — pole extension included with luminaire. Color: Black or white. Lamp Lumen 8072S Twin 2 100W E•17 HPS 9500 8072MH Twin 2 100W ED•17 MH 8500 For compatible poles, see page 153 ° 1_-UK •• ---1- — ....... �3 ?5: C_�—I-_\_ ESNIIIti��� ►��\_► 8072 IMIti 5 - 40m `ti��__ 8071 MCI. _ EN8 UM M__W11 © 0 2 __IISSOMMIII►- Ulla= - -••- 2 :MI_:► 16 10 20 :II6:I 0 40 15 5 2 05 02 01 14 _ alli It. _.... 2 __ t.�. ��M...11 _...I .11 _ m 0 2 4 5 8 10 12 14 16 15 20 __ 111 0 4 2 0 1_-UK •• ---1- — ....... �3 ?5: - -� :: _ `ti��__ 8071 MCI. _ EN8 UM M__W11 © 0 2 Ulla= •i:I:��3M:._ 4 6 8 10 12 14 u 16 10 20 __ •�_ - IA am t_ 40 = � /�II/I/�IN _ �' 0 2 ID 5 2 1 03 02_0.1 14 /III /I/rI___ 6 8 10 12 14 15 ,� 15 20 © IMIUIM=MIMMCHII.M. a.---- 1_-UK •• ---1- — ....... �3 ?5: - -� :: 8072 11 . 0 O NMI..O MCI. _ EN8 UM M__W11 © 0 2 Ulla= •i:I:��3M:._ 4 6 8 10 12 14 u 16 10 20 BEGA 151 z � Z. QQ JU. U co OQ` WI J.1- WO g J LL = 0 I— W. z F. t- O z W p O N: D H, W w' 2 H I!-O. I1• z O~ z BEGA Pole Mounted Luminaires - Wind load ratings- Equivalent Projected Area No. . EPA No. EPA No. EPA No. EPA No. EPA No. EPA 8071 1.5 8973 5.5 9372 0.8 9755 1.8 9858 1.8 9962 2.5 8072 3.0 9003 1.7 9389 1.9 9756 2.5 9898 1.9 9973 5.0 8081 2.0 9004 1.7 9461 3.4 9757 3.6 9900 1.0 9978 7.5 8082 2.0 9005 3.4 9561 5.1 9758 5.4 9906 2.0 9990 ' 0.6 8176 1.8 9006 3.4 9587 2.4 9772 5.0 9914 1.7 9998 1.9 8178 2.6 9183 1.9 9588 4.8 9779 7.5 9919 1.1 9999 3.8 8891 2.4 9189 1.9 9589 7.2 9801 1.7 9946 0,2 8892 4,8 9264 7.2 9662 4.8 9802 3.4 9947 0.4 8893 7.2 9272 0.5 9701 1.8 9803 5.1 9954 2.4 8971 2.4 9364 1.7 9702 2.5 9804 2.2 9957 3.6 8972 4.8 9365 2.4 9703 3.6 9849 4.0 9959 5.4 BEGA Poles - Wind Load Ratings - Maximum EPA at various MPH EPA calculations allow for 1.3 Gust Factor No. MPH 70 80 90 100 120 No. 906 14.8 10.9 8.4 6.7 4.5 0708 907 15.9 11.9 9.1 7.2 4.9 0708/5 926 10.5 7.4 5.4 4.0 2.5 0908 927 13.7 10.1 7.6 5.9 3.8 0908/5 928 16.2 11.9 9.0 7.1 4.6 1108 944 11.8 8.6 6.4 5.0 3.3 1308 958 11.8 8.6 6.4 5.0 3.3 1508 974 14.8 10.9 8.4 6.7 4.5 1708 986 10.7 7.9 6.0 4.6 2.9 1908 999 15.9 11.9 9.1 7.2 4.9 MPH 70 80 90 100 120 14.4 10.8 8.3 6.6 4.3 23.8 17.8 13.7 10.9 7.1 10.7 7.9 6.0 4.6 2.9 17.5 13.1 10.1 8.0 5.3 13.7 10.1 7.6 5.9 3.8 16.2 11.9 9.0 7.1 4.6 13.2 9.5 7.1 5.4 3.5 10.5 7.4 5.4 4.0 2.5 10.9 7.6 5.5 4.0 2.4 152 BEGA .; 0 0 0 01 I A D1 - D2 Group 11 Group 12 Pole Straight Round Group 13 Height Top 0 0 D1 1 u- D1 'I- — D2 - D3 - Group 14 0 0 01 1 -n- D1 D2 Butt Tenon D3 (1) Group 15 - D3 - D2 -D3 - Group 16 Group 17 Group H ' D1 D2 D1 Wall B.C. D3se Options Available (Specify) 958 W /Cast round base cover 14 10'0 4 974 W /Cast round base cover 14 12'0 5 Straight Round W/Tenon .125 " , 71/4 8'/2 A,B,D,E .125 - 81/2 ' '9 A,B,D,E 999 W /Integral round base 12 6'63/4 31/4 31/4 23/8 .125 53/16 9'/2 906 W /Cast round base cover, 13 12'4'/2" 5 '" 5 3 ..125 8'/2 9 907 W /Cast round base cover 13 . 8'41/2" 4 4 23/a ' .125 71/4 81/2 Tapered Round W /Bell Base 926. 15 16'77/8" . 3 . 51/3 . .125 107/16 153/4 927 15 ;, 12'15/8" 3 51/2 .125 107/16 153/4. A 928 15 .. .. 13'93/4" . 3 51/2 .125 107/16. " 153/4 A Tapered Round 986 W /Integral round base 16 9'10'18" 23/8 0708 W /Cast round base cover 17 7'8" 3 0908 W /Cast round base cover 17 9'8" 3 4 0708/5 W /Cast round base cover 17 , "7'8" 3 .` 5 0908/5 W /Cast round base cover 17 9'8" 3 : 5 1108 W /Cast round base cover 17 ;.11'8" 3 5 1308 W /Cast round base cover 17 13'8" 3 5 1508 W /Cast round base cover 17 .15'8" ' 3 5 1708 W /Cast round base cover 17 17'8" " 3 5 1908 W /Cast round base cover 17 19'8 "' 3 5 Stepped Round 41/2 4 944 W /Cast round base cover 11 10'0" Options A For 23/8" 0.0. tenon; suffix: T B For inserts and pole cap for luminaires 9272, 9372; suffix: 10 (single), 2D (double), 3D (triple) C For ballast location in base of pole (required for 70W or 100W Metal Halide on some luminaires); suffix 1B (single), 2B (double), 3B (triple) D For 3" O.D, tenon; suffix: T3 E For pole heights other than standard up to 20 ft. max; suffix: height required (ie: 958/C -14 [for 14 ft]) .125 77/e ' 1113/16 A,B .125 71/4 81/2 A,B .125 - 71/4 81/2 A,B,C .125 81/2 9 ' ' A,B,C .125 81/2 9 A,B,C .125 81/2 9 A,B,C .125 8' /2 9 A,B,C .188 81/2 9 A,B,C .188 81/2 9 A,B,C .188 81/2 9 A,B,C .125 8'h A,E BEGA 153 SLS Dimensions Max. Wt. 20 lbs. E.P.A. 1.0 1*-6' /e� 87/8" 133/4" K. -11 " ->1 103/e' 1 Aiming Ranges In relation to fixture mounting Ground mount Wall mount can be inverted allowing full upward aiming. • 8118 8erie6 HOUSING: One -piece die -cast aluminum in a multi - radiused rectangular shape with integral cooling ribs over the back and .094" minimum wall thickness. Cast slip hinges with stainless steel pins. One -piece vulcanized silicone gasket between housing and door frame, concealed when fixture is closed. FINISH: Housing, door frame and swivel T -stem are baked -on polyester powder finish. Available in standard black and bronze and optional verde green. DOOR FRAME: One -piece die -cast aluminum .188" minimum wall thickness, mates with housing to create a continuous multi - radiused shape. Door frame secures to housing by two stainless steel recessed captive allen -head screws. Cast slip hinges allow removal without tools. 3/16" thick clear tempered glass lens is sealed to door frame by a one -piece vulcanized silicone gasket and four stainless steel clips. Four holes provided for attachment of Barn Door, Glare Shield, and Polycar- bonate Shield. SWIVEL T -STEM: One -piece die -cast aluminum design with 3/4" pipe thread for mounting. Frictional locking system, featuring an internal silicone grommet, provides unlimited positioning. To adjust, loosen top 2 stainles steel recessed alien- head screws on back plate. REFLECTOR ASSEMBLIES: Three distri- butions available. Horizontal flood and vertical flood reflectors offered with specular hammer tone optical components mounted to satin anodized aluminum frame. Horizontal spot reflector is offered with semi - specular aluminum optical compo- nents. Reflector assembly mounts into fixture housing with four screws. HPS, MH, and MV medium base sockets are glazed porcelain, 4KV pulse rated with spring center contacts. ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS: Factory mounted in housing and pre -wired with leads extending through silicone gasket and swivel T -stem. UL recognized compo- nents with high -power factor ballasts rated for -20°F. Optional photocell internally mounted with flush sensor in rear of J -box. PHOTOMETRICS: Based on independent testing laboratory reports. SPECIFICATION: Underwriters Laboratories listed for wet locations. SPECIFICATION INFORMATION Select appropriate choice from each column. Series SLS Lamp Wattage 70 100 150 175 Lamp Type Line" Voltage Optics Ballast Enclosure MH —Metal Halide 70 100 150 HPS —High Pressure Sodium 75 100 MV— Mercury Vapor 120 HF— Horizontal Flood VF— Vertical Flood HS— Horizontal Spot 0 —Not Applicable Finish BLK —Black BRZ —Bronze VDG —Verde Green "' Options Accessories LL —Less Lamp 0 —With Lamp* EXAMPLE OF AN ORDER 1 SLS -175 - MH -120 - HF _ 0 _ VDG _ LL- BD Lamps are included with each SLS fixture. "120 Volt is standard. Consult factory for other available voltages. "'Verde Green Is an optional finish. (Black base color with green flecks.) Barn Doors (BD): Extruded aluminum doors with anti - reflection baffles. Each door hinged with a stainless steel clip — locks by a mounting screw Doors are individually removable. Assembly mounts to pre -cast door frame holes and may be used with Polycarbonate Shield option. Caution: Not recommemded for ground mounted fixtures in vandal prone areas. Glare Shield (GS): Formed 16 Ga. Aluminum. Mounts to pre-cast door frame holes and may be used with Polycarbonate Shield option. Polycarbonate Shield (PS): 1/8" clear convex U.V. stabilized, formed polycarbonate. Mounts to pre-cast door frame holes. May be used with Barn Door or Glare Shield option. Caution: Use only when vandalism is anticipated. Useful life is limited by U.V. discoloration from sunlight, MV, or MH lamps. Architectural Junction Box (JB): Cast aluminum body with extruded matching cover. One-piece E.P.D.M. cover gasket. Internal ground screw provided. 3/4" N.P.S.M. fixture mount with sealing locknut. Two 1/2" N.P.S.M. for conduit entry. For above grade installation only. Junction Box with Photocell available (JBP). JB— Architectural J -Box JBP— Architectural J -Box with Photo Cell PS— Polycarbonate Shield GS —Glare Shield BD —Barn Doors SM— Stanchion Mount WM —Wall Mount PT—Post Top Adaptor TA Thread Adaptor Stanchion Mount (SM): 3" O.D. x .250" x 18" extruded aluminum with 3/4" N.P.S.M. fixture mount. Wiring and internal ground lug accessible through hand hole. Wall Mount (WM): Aluminum mounting plate adapts to standard 4" round J -boxes (by others). Fixture threads to mounting plate. GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. Post Top Adaptor (PT): One-piece cast aluminum — mounts on pole with 2" pipe tenon (2 -3/8" O.D. 2 -1/2" min. length or 2 -1/2" pipe tenon (2 -7/8" O.D. x 3 -1/2" min. length). Fixture threads into daptor and attaches to pole with alien set screws. P'st Top Adaptor allows mounting of one or two fi ures and 3600 horizontal adjustment. 1/2" Thread pipe reducer pipe thread ( Adaptor (TA): Machined aluminum dapts 3/4" pipe thread (Tstem) to 1/2" y others). LAMP DATA Order Number Description Mercury Vapor 78004 78014 Metal Halide 75 Watt E -17 Mercury Vapor 100 Watt E -17 Mercury Vapor 78112 78116 78122 78123 High Pressure Sodium 78303 78306 78308 70 Watt E -17 Metal Halide 100 Watt E -17 Metal Halide 150 Watt E -17 Metal Halide 175 Watt E -17 Metal Halide 70 Watt E -17 High Pressure Sodium 100 Watt E -17 High Pressure Sodium 150 Watt E -17 High Pressure Sodium Average Life (Hours) 16,000 24,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 24.000 24,000 24,000 %ir Horizontal Flood SLS -HF Vertical Flood SLS -VF GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. Horizontal Spot SLS HS Wall Mount (WM) Standard 4" round box by others. Double Tenon Mount (DM) Post Top (PT) Double Bolt -On Mount (BM) 1 Stanchion Mount (SM) III I 11 II �_--- II Ir Architectural J -Box (JB) Stanchion Mount Tenon (ST) Pole with 2" pipe size tenon by Greenlee or others SLM Dimensions Max. Wt. 68 Ibs. E.P.A. 3.0 15" 20• 24" Aiming Ranges 360° 811M 8erie8 HOUSING: One -piece cast aluminum in a multi - radiused rectangular shape with integral cooling ribs over the back and .188" minimum wall thickness. Internal concealed hinges permit full access to reflector and interior without tools. One - piece extruded EPDM gasket between housing and door frame. FINISH: Housing, door frame and mount- ing arm are baked -on polyester powder finish. Available in standard black and bronze or optional verde green. DOOR FRAME: One -piece cast aluminum .200" minimum wall thickness, mates with housing to create a continuous multi - radiused shape. 3/16" thick clear tempered glass lens is sealed to door frame by a one -piece extruded silicone gasket and eight stainless steel clips. Door frame is secured with four captive stainless steel recessed allen -head screws. Four holes provided for attachment of Glare Shield, Polycarbonate Shield and Louver Shield. SWIVEL MOUNTING ARM: Two -piece cast aluminum swivel design with external splice compartment and aluminum access cover. Fixture may be wired after mount- ing. Internal teeth provide positive locking. Fixture may be adjusted in 5° increments through a range of 190? Arm accepts standard 2 -3/8" O.D. x 4 -3/4" long (minimum) tenon and is secured by four recessed alien set screws (and optional through bolt by others). Swivel adjustment is made by concealed hex head pivot bolt. REFLECTOR ASSEMBLIES: Four distri- butions available. Horizontal and vertical flood reflectors have specular and hammer tone optical components mounted to a satin anodized aluminum frame. Medium flood and spot reflectors are offered with multi- faceted specular aluminum optical components. Interchangeable reflector assemblies mount with four quarter turn fasteners. Quick disconnect wiring allows removal without tools. Sockets are glazed porcelain, 4KV pulse rated. ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS: Factory mounted in housing and prewired with leads extending through swivel mounting arm. UL recognized components with high -power factor ballasts rated for -20° F starting. Optional photocell internally mounted in swivel mounting arm wiring access cover. PHOTOMETRICS: Based on independent testing laboratory reports. TESTING: UL Listed and CSA certified for wet locations. listed for wet locations. CSA Certified GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. Z Z 6 JU UO U 0 • LLJ J = CO WO 2 u. Q rn =a F- W z= H H O z i- W W U� co O — O t— WW HI- u. O WZ • = O~ z Series Lamp Wattage Lamp Type Line Voltage Optics Ballast Enclosure Finish Options Accessories SLM 250 400 HPS — High Pressure Sodium 250, 400 Watt MH — Metal Halide 250, 400 Watt MV — Mercury Vapor 175, 250 Watt 120 P06 240 Q� — Quad Tap HE—.Horizontal Flood VF — Vertical Flood MF — Medium Flood SP — Spot 0 — Not Applicable BLK — Black BRZ — Bronze VDG — Verde Green LL — Less Lamp PC — Photo Cell 0 — With Lamp GS — Glare Shield PS — Polycarbonate Shield LS — Louver Shield ST — Stanchion w/Tenon WM — Wall Mount DS — Dual 180 Side Mount TS — Triple 90 Side Mount NS — Dual 90 Side Mount OS — Quad Side Mount DN — Double 180 Top Mount TN — Triple Top Mount ON — Quad Top Mount EXAMPLE OF AN ORDER SLM — 250 —MH- 120 —HF -0— VDG —O —ST For International Ballasts, consult factory. Lamp Data Order Number Description Average Life (Hours) Mercury Vapor 78027 175 Watt E -28 Mercury Vapor 24,000 78028 250 Watt E -28 Mercury Vapor 24,000 Metal Halide 78130 250 Watt E -28 Metal Halide 10,000 78153 400 Watt BT -28 Metal Halide (Reduced Jacket) 20,000V 15,000H High Pressure Sodium 78314 250 Watt ET -18 High Pressure Sodium 78315 400 Watt ET -18 High Pressure Sodium 24.000 24,000 -' = GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. Z Q• H W II M, J U U O� 4 CO CO 11J W = - I—: CO LL W O LL. < co t-_ Z� 0 Z O • _ F-. wW H — w H: —O il'I Z' co O � Z Accessories GLARE SHIELD (GS): Formed 1/16" thick aluminum. Mounts to cast door frame holes and may be used with Polycarbonate Shield option. POLYCARBONATE SHIELD (PS): 1/8" clear convex, U.V. stabilized, formed polycarbonate. Mounts to cast door frame holes. May be used with Glare Shield option. Caution: Use only when vandalism is anticipated. Useful life is limited by U.V. discoloration from sunlight HPS or MH lamps. LOUVER SHIELD (LS): Formed 1/16" thick aluminum with black finish. Mounts to cast door frame holes. Provides glare control. Available on medium flood and spot distribution only. Mounting Brackets STANCHION MOUNT TENON (ST): 3" O.D. x 250" x 18° extruded aluminum with 2" pipe tenon (2 -3/8" O.D. x 4 -3/4" min. length). Wiring and internal ground lug accessible through hand hole. PAD/WALL MOUNT (WM) (Pad Mount shown): 2' pipe size aluminum tenon welded to a cast aluminum plate. Plate has four 1/2" dia. mounting holes, and plate has two 1/2" N.P.T. for conduit entry. Powder finish. Wall mount is single fixture only. Pad mount may be multiple mounting. FLOODLIGHTING BRACKETS FBO -5 Horizontally mounted 2" x 4 -3/4' pipe size aluminum tenon welded to a steel plate and secured by two bolts. Pole preparation "F" required when ordering FBO -5 bracket. FBO -18 Horizontally mounted 2' x 17- 1/2' pipe size aluminum tenon welded to a steel plate and secured by two bolts. Pole preparation "F" required when ordering FBO -18 bracket. Note: FBO -5 and FBO -18 brackets can be ordered for round or square steel poles. Poe Pre aratlon'r Square Poles F80.5 Poe Preparation Round Poles SIDE MOUNT: For installations not requiring individual horizontal fixture adjustment. Horizontally mounted 2" pipe size aluminum tenons welded to a cast aluminum hub secured by four recessed alien set screws (through bolt optional by others) to poles with 2" pipe size tenons (2 -3/8" O.D.x 4 -3/4" min. length). Available in Double 90 °, Double 180 °, Triple and Quad mounting configurations. TOP MOUNT: For installations requiring full horizontal fixture adjustment. Vertically mounted 2" pipe size aluminum tenons welded to extruded aluminum arms with removable end caps for wiring access. Arms are welded to a cast aluminum hub secured by four recessed alien set screws (through bolt optional by others) to poles or stanchions with 2" pipe size as GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. SLS with Polycarbonate Shield SLS with Barn Doors SLM with Glare Shield SLS Wall Mount The wide variety of options and accessories available on SL Family luminaires provide unlimited solutions to lighting requirements. GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. A Subsidiary of LSI Industries, Inc. 1510 Capital Parkway, Suite k 110 • Carrollton, Texas 75006 (214) 466 -1133 • FAX (214) 446.2202 GRE -SL 7/94.10M 01994 Greenlee Lighting Inc., Printed in the U.S.A. SLS on Architectural Junction Box SLS with Glare Shield SLM with Polycarbonate Shield 8" Extruded Aluminum Tempered Glass Lens 1/2" NPT Cast Aluminum Ends Mercury Vapor, Metal Halide, High Pressure Sodium or Incandescent Lamp. SPECIFICATION INFORMATION Select appropriate choice from each column. 703 YIINI - FIDOD LAMP TYPES: Mercury Vapor, Metal Halide, High Pressure Sodium and Incandescent. HOUSING: Constructed of rugged extruded aluminum, with cast aluminum end plates. Silicone gasketing. FINISH: Available finishes include bronze, black and green. LENS: Heat - resistant, tempered glass lens. SOCKET: Medium base screw shell 4kV pulse- rated. WIRING: Pre -wired with #18 leads, extending from swivel. BALLAST: High -power factor, minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Available in above grade box or recessed composite housing with a potted anti - siphon wiring chamber. REFLECTOR: Specular aluminum. FASTENERS: Stainless steel. Series Lamp Wattage Lamp Type* Line** Voltage Optics Ballast Enclosure Finish Options Accessories 703 35 50 70 75 25 40 100 150 MV- Mercury Vapor (50, 75, or 100 Watt E -17 Clear) MH -Metal Halide (50, 70, 75 or 100 Watt ED17) HPS -High Pressure Sodium (35, 50, or 70 Watt E -17) 120 0 -Not Applicable AG -Above Grade CH- Composite Box w /Hub Lid BRZ- Bronze BLK -Black GRN -Green (CH available in lack and Bronze only.) 0 -Not Applicable B -Small Junction Box w /Hub Lid (Aluminum) H -Small Junction Box w /Hub Lid (For use with Incandescent models.) J Mini Flood Shield INC- Incandescent (25 or 40 Watt T -10) (75, 100, 150 E26) 120 0 -Not Applicable 0 -Not Applicable EXAMPLE OF AN ORDER 703- 50 - MV- 120 -0 -AG- GRN -O -J • Lamp not included with fixture. See amp specification chart or consult factory. Local interpretations of the National Electric Code vary. Consult your local inspector prior to specifying voltage other than 120. ■ .- GREENLEE LIGHTING INC Z W ce -J C.) UO LLI al F- �W WO u_ Q Z= H t-- 0 Z W I— W U0 0— O WW H c): u- O u.lZ' U0 F- OI- Z PHOTOMETRIC DATA Mercury Vapor 75W E -17 Metal Halide 70W ED17 80 80° 60° 40° 20° 0° 20° 40° 60° 80° 80 8O° 60° 40° 20° 0° 20° 40° 60° 80° 60° 40° 20° 0° -20° -40° -60° -80° 1 11L ;-3 -- i 41 1l ' i .t__-! 1 °1o•: MAX) ioo _1::.. soo- f 60° 40° 20° 0° -20° -40° -60° •80° TYPICAL INSTALLATION DETAILS Conduit Mount (by other) Power Supply All wiring should meet local, state, and national electrical codas. GREENLEE LIGHTING INC. Greenlee Lighting Inc. A Subsidiary of LSI Industries Inc. 1510 Capital Parkway, Suite # 110 Carrollton, Texas 75006 (214) 466 -1133 • FAX (214) 446 -2202 GRE•MINI•FLOOD•REV 5/91.10M *1991 Greenlee Lighting Inc., Printed in the U.S.A. High Pressure Sodium 70W E -17 8080° 60° 40° 20° 0° -20° -40° -60° -80° 60° 40° 20° 0° 20° 40° 60° 80° ACCESSORIES /OPTIONS Above Grade Ballast Box (AG) ist Mini -Flood Shield (J) Small Junction Box w /Hub Lid (H) Composite Box w /Hub Lid (CH) LAMP SPECIFICATIONS Order Number Description Average Life (Hours) Mercury Vapor J -009 50 Watt E -17 Clear Mercury Vapor Medium Base 16,000 J -009A 75 Watt E -17 Clear Mercury Vapor Medium Base 16,000 J -0096 100 Watt E -17 Clear Mercury Vapor Medium Base 18,000 Metal Halide J -015 70 Watt ED17 Metal Halide Medium Base 5,000 J -015A 100 Watt ED17 Metal Halide Medium Base 7,500 J -015M 50 Watt E -17 Clear Metal Halide Medium Base 5,000 J- 015R -SYVL 75 Watt E -17 Clear Metal Halide (M -101) 5,000 High Pressure Sodium J -026 J -026A J -026B Incandescent J -154 35 Watt E -17 High Pressure Sodium Medium Base 50 Watt E -17 High Pressure Sodium Medium Base 70 Watt E -17 High Pressure Sodium Medium Base 16,000 24,000 24,000 25 Watt T -10 Incandescent 1,000 J -155 40 Watt T -10 Incandescent 1,000 Note: Lamps are not included with fixtures but may be ordered at an additional cost. .NOU°in4s • Z ~W J U O 0 (❑ cnw w_ WO _ LLa =a w Z_ HO zr WW U O 9- ❑1- W W 2 H r- LL O z W U- O F- z 1 Alla AIM ®® asi too.I aJ • I Ii • • I tit It it South Elevation Z Z" • • Q�d 11 Wes. ,U O: -co o U)W W r • LL!. W O. LL =, W • • U0 • 0 • • '1W W'% LLI • ,U= •• O ~' Z • 10/30/2001 10:45 2062411133 e • al DOWNTOWN HARLEY CB-01,13 ES3 I1 I ; OJW.UVWX0012 SLON 10/30/2001 10:45 206241113t 2•d EOSG -04,6 ESZ DOWNTOWN HARLEY PAGE 02 oud uvwl{oaQ ssob d69=TQ to 60 %o0 10/30/2001 10:45 2062411124,, b•d DOWNTOWN HARLEY _.. PAGE 04 E0S6 -O$8 ESE ? ody uVws{osa ssod d6S a T'U to 60 *%uD Z hI- W 6 D. �0 O 0 u) 0; cow JI. I- WO FW Z= F- 1— O Z F- W • W U 0 O -i 0 F-. = U. 6J U N O Z Ross Deckman Arc 253 840 -9503 p.1 Op Q Z w cc cZD JU O 0 CO a W= CO L W O 2 u. co d W = F- _ Z� F- O Z t- W • W U 0 O — WW 2 IL O WZ O — O F' Z *gni p; (kv4b 6) Z HW L2 WD �U 00 co 0 WI F-- W0 � d = F- W = Z F- f-0 Z I- W lij p U O- WW I=- H Z W U= O I- Z SEr110N 14 A. 15 TOWNSHIP 3- PAI RANGE-4--E PROJECT INFORMATION 91E ALOESS MUSS 1a OOw11D . K/AtET-MIESp1L 1LMC 37271aSM •1E M?!Mr soUM aurnt MIw•romr MIN kW =Ham 977 ASA E7 AOES POMMES MU 02 AGES E•vE/rel0t.6 AREA 1Qa ACRESAPd11W MEA Nt w 91E EUMI1O rAIO =MOM LMOSCAPE 5776403 5 MT me MIT HEAR I 1 MEW , E 5 Elrffi O FEET REM AIMITIWAritMeitirlfsam UTILITIES r • OM Q1 L17 C OI IZERS, 9D w MaTle/rr SO NT01000/ C0117000wA• ITam9fT A le COSMO. •® Able t1 tame/ t 03a1/0Q A• lR MAST w MI >Me IC s vmirtx@-DYImfM 1t � tOCIng o ®NTT ale .•MarMIRY a nMI HARLEYPROJECT COVER SHEET CONSULTANTS IT PCle - 01/1.11 MS R A TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEET I SHEET 2 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 SHEET 6 SHEET 7 ` SIfET 8 COWER SHEET GRADING PLAN GRADING PLAN CROSS -SECTIONS TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN TEMPORARY CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS STORM DRAINAGE CONTRCY. PLAN STORM DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS WATER & SEWER PLAN J RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA A.UG 9 1 1998 PERMIT CENTER CAa BEFORE -you DIG 1 800-424-5555 N • A NM aWYT00 NIr IK Art be W AM MCC Mt x /IRI / OM w N AaMOMO •M x ••Y r x M1 A MIO% BENCH MARK DATA MC OMR Or atwav nsjatw arr 10011110.01111 COMM O x /aeM. sO AOlt OM NO 11101114111 MINIM TOO a./ 1010r1R # Y RR 1T/0. RIM J SURVEYOR'S NOTES I=42 HAM x utMp. TO•.1• If/O • •Olam1 Mt all r rd�y .ne •tYM••� oelION MOM •rl MalianWWI rTilts s TAt � ta/gIt1lAtYa a O•l.wtle•.swam•••Yam Re.r1. ��yt� Irrii•�'ii ' .lr�l �.. swrl.•arrw 111 M 1.ta1 -•I aRliY WNW It!OMIT/ a••••••Wan x Mina. Tr O•rMINT ld a Yb1M1t1s1M.YRM•r•arltMt• LEGAL DESCRIPTION a 1 Kraso OF K 176w0/ NMI w eG UM. M01.11 11A01 MOM. M w 110 Mee a MON ITR A pa tla am a It ITtKrI /•f Mai]1Alramal♦ ARIDO IT a1ORalOO Er Or an s Mr A MEOW r•IMIWIOAIA•MOr De 0A OYK1 Mr MIR .f. KM•••/we/ Ma. 00/001 wM NMI ARd1tr O Rr ttRr Merl lee Mr K wle MINN Ml1011.'Q M w 1= I a R /NNW 1• Ort• - Y . 1 lea arQIQNsiIWInLTYQO R.w MI WOW One AI &I MT A t1AR 0,= I•Q sumVMI Of A Meer IRM R1 A xPOW/ .L 10f1f7 1M a RRl.t MUST a@ O• Rlle OW w �ArawlvT�87E Aa R100� "Ero/ m011,011 AT A IOW NM O YR. AI It m a a•MOtt r w• Rr Tar A 110101y Mq Ar lb Al SA 01010 O K rle 1.10 x"Mee =Mb1111sapt pM p Al l• RIIO•Mir O MT PIT i RI brw v ai awrR1 COMMIT ti,0118tOf M w • MwM a WI MOW A WV - MOM A►x[Or 1AOff lerRW1alTRlerMaui MT x Oletl•s PC PC Srg0plMARs JAMS/ MN1AM MO! r.Le CIOiMO•I•0/s r/W I01 raVfartersdeSTZ I iv NO ON KMN(NN Le v w aYA•r Arl1 MO11•IO Mr NMI wMOf 0 able IM 1•111•1:10•Mw• 11Qa111lf i• MT MOMS at. MR RI x IOIIMtRr AVM Mt AR Me =MbMaur rR O ORE PORT MOM Ar MI Mr ADM be Ya1Oa• Ile / - Pa•O II Ile A x Ile >/a. RR a•Ota ••• t[MOM+xM MR ROMP w YY lb be NWT v 11•tI Me Wit t fl IMMIX Or le leI t POW AOM �'MtI s "SNOW A 1M)an ebb OM Ar>A MIT• Mall WOO Ile A WI.?0'OI.t COW Off PROM 1•t0 ate/ A x OR / ROMA AO.. A •tI ON NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. J r�J ■ t E 1 1 E 1 1 1- W ._ c0 O EA S ■ A c— mtO Co SSS4-idt•-009 olo nog 3aoi39 77►r3 0g21� f Cart .1 trig C9t • 012 Y1 O[9l • yl O1 Ot iiOI • OLZ OCL Nt+7d ONIOHN9 13.7TO1fd A37YVH gi11. 1 OTII NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 'Ella ID=OM r m L iwsi 'Ella Ian O®IMII/4 11aa mur a WOW CIO t sw0 is saa—n X10.1 rs� aw = V1 MOW/ MI na i •or — MM. to 1115r611sa Ilta MECUM MNL2IDW IBM • ue 100/1 Rib M NW ,aw tnw MOP 11-11 :n oat mEULtxc ncxuetton 1. melt lls 1 every mroe H1el■ eMIN OMPANI AsieO weMO e ax PAW D♦WARM 6a,IMAM ■ilmlW NM VC •011INT.1[®ell • PR 10 Wr,tIYT fell Pt IPPLIC VC COMP ID AM PONCA ON �em m TR a le �Oe T A Yi HARLEYPROJECT GRADING PLAN CROSS —SECTIONS A AND B g J tucra!in 700.00 ,-.ur,At,t SECTION A -A XQw CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1 800-424-5555 NE SE :0a00 r_r %O m& l.-2sr Haam T. L SECTION B-B RECEn b CIfiv OF TUKWILA AUG 2 1 1998 PERMIT CENTER NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. a 113. 1 E 1 i 1 E 1 ti sat Ers t i • CEV C06UC1N0 ENCREERSJEOS 111. IMAM AM It 110011011 COMM Mt • WIMAMA ■ COMM OM a flw If VC 101 MO 1i �c 100001.0•R CI tp0: f[ COMM A /T 0011.1100 �1 000111o®ew ,c STOI ■MIr I HARLEYPROJECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1 800-424-5555 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 '► i998 PERM CENTER NOTES 1. ALL DISTIIO UR70E21 ARE APPRO]ONAIE CONTRACTOR NIT. YAROY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION 2. CONSTRUCT AND WYNTNN A FLOFR RAMC FENCE 70 CITY STANDATASS (Ds1 AS NEEDED IT CONTRACTCN ID IEi7-1 EROSION CONTROL STNCMIDS. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. a Um2 �0� Coto cco `zFLU la .32-N1.9S aco2.1110 ZVICO 2ryC 8 tia l :? rl e E 1 1 1 E 1 1 E 1 i F_ 2 'I 0 co co co 003 MY UIR EIP4TRnL MITTS L 00 0VR V TM IMMI Mai 00 RAM m An c10TIV11 . IOMOo MOM O OMMil M ON 00 00 M U01111 r• IT7L MOMC1MO. NOTES I1anM unno . Ltcl tr,.'l i'2i°�,SSb5r:'i�e"I! R ' tTr a M ArrLtlMr. (anrciv urn. ALL mtTrcTa O flanSTROVIMMINgnibiefal OWL ! IMtfLIO MR M wL0/fI MAL COM /O M IMMO TA 61405E147114,WINITIANKRITH LOAD E 0if0i iralM�LCLiI�AU/AS Q atITI2 [lCl ®r01 uaaaL �3tiON LYde�•111 is WI art w OLT rnm. faliESIMILIVAIMERWAS %TL: A ar,0tat M hatUr �p Oq �� AI a t !/W[. 101 MIMS .!TOLE[ 117 MO; OOU ! SVAZATIMArir &Ma A iIOM IYOR "'semi A IYOLM atganknalinrianniang kaWarifMMnM1TAtL A ill x VIQ Mr010 10 7130110.3 02333 COMM 0 IMMO. r07 11:00010 0.03 MMal ! MRO AT •• 1r+v+c111c roc as NMML 0 Mond. 0 MRO AT MTmoM1aT M 70t1! M0 Ama b7Llinir Minagispflaril COMM O WC% IT OWL lip 11 .,.1 .. HIDES NOTES. • t� tll L TNT MOMC1O0W1QO A Mma 0 TIC Mm V10 MR MMOOG ICTIV00 [MR VIVO 030MICT0I KTW00 1000 .77 0 MM031113 Si A 70M0 Of TIC MT. MO RA1210701 WASMO MO 1MLD0010 L ALL DELIS MOLL mums OWL ! 1I1:011 IMM1AMa IMTAMO R M 0311sCrto m IMM1O 10 A/L1C COMICS 70YMWLL Cr TIMO 10000 0MLT01 ALL 0 MC 13/11331 M MVO0AT0l COMM 1W0 OWL ! MOa?O A7 1UC7 OCC IVOT MLVOI MR w VTTIM M M0AO AFTER M IMMI [MO O• O0Am MA O 000 M0 11111143111110000311104311 ILK OWL ! MMOAOO I7 M MnMC10L • OM 0?0?L=MG fl00 ilE96 TM mmo s x Hansel Taaw .m. ■ 110111N To ow LL® 66 MI saw m MIMEO 0 O 0[ONO M 006T 1 It1. Oro10loom AOmrn Loan Os no K AMMVLTC mom NEI A co% II ROIL as mm00 6 NITL�TIOR M 0i ■MMp HARLEYPROJECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES AND DETAILS FILTER FAJPIC FENCE 1HSTALLATMN rCTE2 L M Mao DAM OWL!Ra10M 1113110M01 Oct O070M 1001M Or M M.7MOR 10 AVM pa ? AWL 001100 10 1MItlm MITI CUM Sm. TO MAX, MOMSOLT AT A L0T01 notWM A I�M 6-11c.1 OVMM. M !M MS MOLLY IAMMO0 10 M MOT. L M ram MIX MCC SILL ! MOTALLO 112 MILD/ M Mann LMOL 70010M 113QM01t OWL 00 SIMOAMOMMI Cr L MT ORMO MT0vL1 MMMaT 010 M EOM a1MIM v MI MOMS. 1 A TO01 OWL ! 001011113. MOLT M 000 VO[ M O 1100 011, Am Re mown TOMVMn IOfi to rued T6 rim 000C TO It 4 MITI MISIRS M00101 rim Mitt 1c LQL VlL101 AMR. MIX VML ! IAROO IMAM 10 TIC Limn t!f Cr IOC 0411 030100I LIrt VMcMTMLO AT v110 I Mai 1.0a TOYMn at 10 MM. M WO MLL mmos MN M 1001AI0•01 Or •.0. M Mla11077 013 M M00 AM K 1CMOM MOM 1010. L M MHOS MOWN rim MOM Mwt1 ! 01010 0 MO TO 11C IOCMO 7OOOr ilit rum MMal OIOMO SOOM,MOOLM 007* Nan Orr MS1010 MMC mei Ma MOO mow M ®Mil YOtr ERA¢ rLm MCC MOLL m ! MTMLO 10 00710 Im L VIO UMMMOM MR! VA= M QOM ROT 1001O[ 1103.M MO 101 OCR= MCC NO 0 OMMm IN 001 A Odir. M .Lm 0AMQ O !TARO 0 VO 0077.? 71 M M01 WV ML OOO /011mr 0/ MTMM ION M AMT. 7. SC MCI SOIL It 01000.0 ono LL OM MIMM SALMI VYO L MSS MAMA ram OWL ! 10010 1/10 i6T MVO 0V0 1101MOIL MCOc. fR M01 COOL TIC IMILac MCA 10 1M1 100I01ILT OAAlm L /tm MOW IOOI OWL ! MOQ10 M10A1aT Oro O0 MWILL M AT LUST MALT WOO 70060 Imr/LL Mn I000 07010 OWL TO 1I1! MICSAT/1T. (SEE ROCK CHECK DAM DETAILS) CALL BEFORE YOU DiG 1 800-424-5555 u 11010a0O1000M VTOL MOML 01701 AT COOS 1M Oat MM01 STRAW BALE BARRIER FOR INLET --4 1 a RECEIVED CiTY OF TUKWiLA AUG i 1998 PERMIT CENTER NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 9 DBM CONSULTING ENGINEERS $� 5 M E 1 t 1 E I— Li to L/T Z co CO CO 1a1.11.0 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM CO /1 Pll 1600 E (1.72 warns (T7') 10 ALPE (5 05 ESR RSI 1012 E 721 IDIOM (n) 00 SCOPE (5) 0.5 CB p RTY 10 E 7.0! IDGIH (FT) I0 SLOPE DO O5 ap RY 1(127 E 7.0e IDIOM 01) 40 046E (z 0.5 ap 11Y 10-17 E 1137. IDIOM (FT) 1113 A6E (1q 05 CB RY 1225 600 LOOM (FI) 1e0 sac (1q 00 CO 17 POI 1077 E 615 LUCID (F7) 22 Sl6E (5 0.5 ap RSI 10.77 E 647 1D10111 (FT) 63 046E (1) 0.5 alp 1014 1077 E 677 IDIOM (F7) e0 046E (14 65 CS 110 RAI 1127 E 670 7DG117 (11) CO SLOPE (1) 60 e C01 CO@LTNC DOC:W PO 10739m M•x wawa comae HMI • •vt1w1 n w Oaas• OMR= MO MO m IIMO• GOMM. OD K••t.R AY 0000 xor•r• m wNOX111R, n s O Ma= N 0.01a ID I• IOa O•TT HARLEY PROJECT STORM DRAINAGE PLAN CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1 800-424-5555 CITYtED OF TUKKWILA AUG 2 "i 1998 PERMIT CENTER Is 1r DI / OAX - OAT YC2 Q�i•T7UE7 0! Or11 (P)SA.:777 0Y CM^IA OT`.' Al-Du75-11 W" -o,ra v i<< PM 141.113 SA1kY T1"J1 ""'DL Tv�1M.37Y 11'7 NAY' 0 GCMG. CI' n+, oY+^1 2-4. +7 N �c. em \`\ DEMO= rims (1RL NOTE) DT 0- KT T�F Dr3^1111 DIM) VIS M TIE �! 11 D' CATE •!Y4: 1) fl ' 67JX5510 k a 1 a 1 sc sc 11.. ARIL CATO( BASER UAL OE 11PE 1 PM 077 CF 1000.4 I70A01 1Ci11RE AND COISMJCI101 STNOAIOS (1000) DETAL D3-21 i OTEROC•.Y e1PA52 PPE E TO IS OECD OL7P 901N PUMPS FAL NO ALMA SEMI FAL% 3. ALL 0057110 UTU11131 ARE MFIX:GUAIL (=TRACT= Ell VARY BEFORE CQODNCIIOI. A CO11RACI01 BILL 0012E 073150 AMIDE DRAINAGE PPE O CLEAN NO CLEAR OF IMAM NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. r,- (11 LL Imo_; I F, •_i IJrt • E 1 E 1 W 2 ID 03 O 0 -3 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG HARLEY PROJECT T 800-424-5555 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES AND DETAILS min RAM moo we toe A 434 a /a MI IOU SIMI MIL WC OM 3f STDEHALK..: 1L75 al 9L 0+00 c2 12' CIP - 1+23 9.43 NOT TO SCALE • DOI COWLING MIMING 1 >i omST w x rc•rOp an+o NM • PM , no10 NC 01011.01111 • rnrm¢rot°a 9x' 04 O A rt ®Orr IOmnTrfl 0 x OotL x Avvt•••r n@; AVfLIi O MOM a! 10 NI IYd CI arm O • N•C®R i 10•112Y7 OAY11 11,11111. ACCESS LID OUTLET 40'-1 TOP TOP-7.e FLOOR-42 7 VOLUME REOIARED-I 99 CF VOLUME PROPOSED-2720 CF NOT TO SCALE RSOEI ED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 1 9999 • Eft.: i ` CEN S ER NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. a a r-. E 1 11$ !E E 1 O Z op co co O 0) 7 1 / / / / \ / \ PRDPoar�\ (v ON COMM D CINCOS,197B T ROAM I MOD ON UTA�t•�PM= WO MO - tl sm= x m1.N 0MM 0 MN RUT 0 sD nMR/An®naa•••••• lrr \•ft. \ \ HARLEYPROJECT WATER AND SEWER PLAN PIOPOIT EVCIT.C7+CY Fft•AL^ NOM TAP (ETCSTNO LINE) (1) r TAPPING T(E (I) r DOE VALK MOOSE WLOCK O --COON CD49 \ 22LF12'D / le DVS IEE DVMTIENT COOECSW CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1 800-424-5555 eDInPNo •6TO MOWER MR 111E SPONEUERS BY OTHERS fr.4 t¢ m.t3 POST POICA1011 VALK OOLV VALLT 7s-4•s7OP OARS ENE DETEC1DR WALE OEOT VALVE NO VAULT WA mem 1' DOER 1AEIER OITALLID BY OM 1.6" IETLR SETTER (PaTAum WI CONDUCTOR) CRY DETAL R.3-1I [VECTOR DOUBLE ONO( VALVE NO VAULT WET TAP Oh r TNPINO TEE (ERE SPILIPWW1 MAN) SANITARY SEM MANHOLE R1M.112T E-1K N/C • EDITOR OP CRAWL E.14Y N maw: 121 F.u.1LtU E-!t T!• X- 17- IP 4-0.PE N. 1r Ant . F`!t-12Pi M.7.77 SN. II" W4CIPIE_ PM' •E-:.TD• M. t2- CIPIE Y IT .rr -7.PY ¶ . 1Y C1+c4i"sE EC�Ti; SRr'.11 O^!*NNE F:*E 12' MIES 1.. OEIECI01 DOUBLE OEO( VALVE ASSOIRLYI{A�O OTT VAULT AM -Pat OOF ILONA MRASIRULII RE 1 EHIDRANT A RT NO SETTN0 POI} WE OTT CF MONA Il AS1RUCIUE DOWN NO CONSIRUCT01 ITNIDNO3 (Ta-4). 4. VALVE sox AS -PER are a IM OLA NRAORUCRIIE DL1101 A1/D COSTNCTOE STANDARDS 116-/1 S CONCRETE MD= AS -PEA OTT OF 1UUtA NRASIRI?CTUE DES101 NC COSIBUCT01 STANDARDS 0IV ( -I). S. SNITMY !CC SEWER AS -PER OF NMSi11UCIUlE DE901 NO C06111UCTCN SWANONOS 33-1 7. CLEAN OUT AS -POI OTT OFCOCITIOCINN STANDARDS(gMD=auk DESIOI D 0. ALLIFHALS IOU.Y WITH COY OF TUCRA STANDAN+7 B. RLII ADOO FOR ROAD, BRIOCE. MID MUNCIPAL Csa1RICTOI 1aALL EQ31N0 PAVEMENT !HAIL IN SAR CUT NO PATOED. AS -PER OTT STANDARD (ES-]} RECEIVED etITY OF TUKWILA AUG 2 `► 1998 ':•LRMIT CENTER SPFOAI NOTE_ CONTRACTOR LULL EUD VANNT MONO UTIITIES. PRIG ID DONS1RUCIION. a a V 1 E 1 1 E 1 1 E 1 c0 03 co Ci 2 m 0 0) NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. DOWNTOWN HARLEY-DAVIDSON TUKWI L A , W A S H I N G T O N SHEET INDEX LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACT CORM TKO/rR Puw O nnwa nET•Twa _ SE TPCISTICsne ITO If i71I. is SORTPOTTERS. C. LOPS CET , 00.1. I.0.02* MWiON rota PMILtLNGT ono.. M POLAR. TIO* PEET MCP/ A NW.° MOP° M 111 CP A CLOT p1 TN CMOS LK P M G4.Al.1 SRMON 40013N POAD, KT. PANO, WO PAIN. APMO.MTRT ORM MT SOT 40 TO TEST ICON P TE GUM MR COKR T6C[.101C111 T SCI pT ALINE .00 TEST ONST4IT•NNW 4O P.R6112. M CEHRR.E P eK S•O 4? 444W. N PITO.0KTOS WARD DDT40EPM•OO TEET TO• ROM SY•R11.0.1w•rla•( 11 • D.1T4CE P MORO PSCN• NOW. IN. ATM DO P• CUTK ON TN MOM W P SAO 1.W4.M 1RwlON.1w0T1CT1 ROAD. SAP DO P WATT C{W .....N.1.1 LOO TEST sow 4O AM RUT KST P M CNN. COWER ES1.1D1 S•0 NIOC . 7 10 t. T1Er. SOON .0 SW TEST • D147040 P TODD PEST TO M 1Er[IKMTERT w PM PUGET SCPO ELECTRIC RLL.•i 14 Cry., MLA MP011 A-).' SUS, 40M SAO NA OF WO RC° P WY • 3 303?I Ri4TlTDAL00 SM P1 CS SS0� RD•R P WTA M17401 P KT TEST, TIEs. MOM TN. SOON AST, E Ti � T SON Kft, M101 *OW VN• TENT• Iowa.UP.0 RUT TOM 1.0.P PROJECT TEAM C4EER, RUSSELL AND JENIIFER TOM 6T21 MARTIAN LUTHER KNG UTAT SOUTH *RATTLE. W6 50116 CONTACT. R1155 C753) A2^H11ECT, R055 HECKMAN ARCHITECT 401 5. MERIDIAN 54417E 715 PUYALLUP . UTA 50313 CONTACT, HILL 5010154 L753, IMO-9405 CIVIL, STATISTICS DEt7 CONSULTDO ENGITHER5 SO2 Y1T4 5T. NE 51117E 30 AUEURL ed 90002 CONTACT, CANA 1105ER (53) 551.0974 PROJECT 00.1. ppMOW L14GETprOYa1 LOCATION pC1T MTw 17.1 APT-. RET4, rt.CLE RLPOE L 1u TINA. ji CM1I DISTRICT S1t�a�J4 I O SPA 1110..... 3OEwnRIOR 30S,TREST IRLAR KD.1T CCOE, 1r1116 OCCv4Cr• O.n COb111.710w TTR. DULDM AREN P.IRLC1 MM. SOFT. ROOK. LOIN . RI. TOTAIsTLOSI xi PT. .LAN. MC.. TOPA SO P.Pt xin:uiTALAS" TaOiuT ROO.RETAILONCE TOTAL PARcw 1Q°`"a,To .:R • STA. • n COMPACT SP4s110,Al. SPACE, NN-.PAT PARoo 1OCNNO10TL40• TD . POR Lrf4COR6OA 11P } S ER APO AC S CPRSTR P TN MOR DS LOLL D I TD0 P LA. NSW NT.• SOT • DRT40E P OM PEST ALOO TN NWT P VAT P M PIB.04 0001.AC1RC IWLW T SO M YMRT MARTIN OF S•0 ,,RIP 140 OW) t>al1CM. aIDN T. .01416T N.1CLwP WO ROO P so. C CEPT TNT PO10O1 P M STD. POTTER 40 COLD. DON•TO1 CP.A. C.P1 CwNRT. Wa'�'a.ow4cTD1E Tec+e'. TORTS R4Dt.tut. WI. w TWA RET PP. 1 YOR 1w*1•T M PIP • °NYE: 0. TN CWRR LTN P M 71L100 14.004 •41.0 7 PO•D NON PAVED. PA ORM APPRORIAnLT 1DDD R[i 11. 40ID TM ICS.547 P M 3?. CORER TONE TA W .110.T• LPN WOO TWEET 0.0. • tin TST.40 P•Rlat4 T.1 M 004740.4E P TK SAD 071410lON PO4701 •.OTKw MAD • 03740E P SHOO PELT TO • row O.ON ES.Ra NNW w•.T.• EAST • TN MO?NCs WO1.1.1. IOWA wiNn'.uciTiw ROAD. WO DC. Cs 0 C4Wx1&1I1TIIT UOOI106,4M A. ANt RUT LEST PM (WARTED RSQ1lw COME. 10'Y MK!• D T4 CP WOO I TO M 40744OTEPLT fa.o a xclRIp RAC. wNr v WT. MKU NORM O. ° KDO WO MAR. P WO MNl P WIT • M.C1. 144 4 . KS *1.04 LIMY. It0R P war • 03TANE P SCSI rm. MT �4O1TN A1•'l*31 A 0ITTY.S00 v ROA MT, TN. SOON .O'k' L43l • ONNT.L. P NO R41 TO 1.E PONT P C.PT•N0 PP00w TKCEP CORDED 10 NE Car P luOPI rot MT1 VICINITY MAP .01 TO SCALE TROSTIT PC. WIS OP IL . -IT .D...•LIT.4x DaAa.4m TACIT MT. tEV ups PROWS. C NOIR ICY ISJIS SO R1.2.K4S T1M fON KTiNT -6 517E PLAN 48th AVENUE SOUTH eEALE. r..D-O• NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. nI.�,DTLT1 w�a 0 AC5 Service Department ❑ 91ppvg 4. Reeelvee \ Clo•;ng 3 Cosirg 1 W'r Overflow r Motor Cccwsales New Used Motorcycles Nueva Motorcycles MAIN FLOOR PLAN mNe en �. 40 Sr,. • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. la siOrrlICM Vt. a Storage Poem 7 5torag. Room I ll 11[ Okman 0 TakIng Gonf>snce / wog Red. .74 Orarrlcs f Motor accsssoris .dam x\� N.. a U..d t'Idorcyclw Ff.ty. Motoreycl.s re.e.t Deb's Office Shur.onY Ofrlcs Jen's Officer Rain omc. MotorcidMs M7otdclouva IeWwl UPPER FLOOR PLAN . err Pr r. Clan. iG 0i� J NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. na = ADI tanatcn aon v u MOM. MIMEO. furor. our rera. moo, I 1 /el wuci.rnn 111, cot na ....r. er =Titan OF ___• ` .r T.r., Ill 111 11111 _ _w— _--_ .. wale ��~ Mt Mt.. "`" S0.0 /' DUST ELEVATIONCar'"`" 3*! rI1cIX �T [Mrt. w� I•0.YST K KIiCiD . O[wil— �� wv ..ce n .ae. ra.-.•� ra.• WnwTED cad a Hoot us ae-vr 4 aC u.ir .i.v �� - ...w.aao.... "fP rMAL MOO SOUTH °J.Et.%CO'T. ELEvATION NORTH ELEvATION >rLR..K. co-cwen uz< we [AK 1 Ms IP DOTTCri C. :.,n......... -I .f _ Og • • ___ EAST ELEVATION ^� " ` M A _ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 11 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ne: Ara SUMP, Bed Sumer Red Stamm Maple 2'salm kene,,,n Kt do. max. uniform Myq.blbrta- lip &mama - Cadmus beeYrsTeslgmta' European Hornbeam 2oL Bht. min. 2e as mos Bream b.ee.%Alain - a Meow C.Alb.ra AMeowe='Abe e tgel Too. e loon Fua Canwga WOWS StJSMGAilara' Camellia 5 pd. 5' on. NI loam Coma SI:4M era melseye' Mewl BebTwip Dogwood I t» 4 Cane rem 7 on. Fue tam Enoramsan0ng George' King Game AIM 1 gm 7aa BA tam En. cornea Wooer Beady' 0mM Beauty Heath t gel Ton. Fug tam Esra.ona lanplsFrmrt - 'Apple Beacom' Escalade 5gel. 5' on. Fue bin Ewrryms .YWrC8'rpuB7 Deed Bumnp Bush 5 ger 7o4. Full Soon JunpMos aenerms'Gold Coats' Juniper 5 gal Son Full b00 Junper 00 nonsonc ex'Bbe Chp' Juniper I gal. 7 o.a Fad lone 4141r4122 syuar9U EnpeshtereederPontoons t per 7 as Fee form - - frACOSa Shrubby Onquelai t gal 3 o.c.Fullloam Prunus Mnocvnaus'Qa Lwhena' Otto uty9ere laurel 5 gel 5oe. Fue tam - Spasm 08aio'Anthony Wamrer Sprees l get - . 7 o a Fee brm Noureum daNW VW/um 1 pa. J' a.a _ Full loan Lawn Sod — Adjacent zone: Commercial -Light Industrial Side Yard Landscape:------- 5' Required. 8' Width Provided. Street Tree. Typ. at 20' o.c. --- Verity utility location and adjust tree location. 48th Avenue South Adjacent zone: Commercial -tight Industrial Rear Yard Landscape: None Required. 1 1/2'to 9' Width Provided. n o '•Y•.te�: AEI ie 1 9' j 'ttg at! i e o 1 " _1 o o 0 PRCPOSIDDOWNrOWN HARLEY-DAVIDSON. REFER TOARCHITECT SET. °ar< ` ' qt ---14- - 1- f - E S 8.oseale 4Setiaitaltit4. sins ab C- Sae7'A.�4A9e �-f^ P. t --- Front Yard Landscape: 12.5' Required. Proposed Sidewalk 18' Width Provided. Adjacent zone: Commercial -Light Industrial Side Yard Landscape: 5' Required. 5'Wtdth Provided. ' 40' —81I' North NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. DOWNTOWN HARLEY- DAVIDSON .,r..a.....•• r ir.. ren.reerses R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Sam eierir. ,0,' ce.e P...pe.e.mm Jurisdiction: City of T �� ila ; six OLUED IgnIrra 60089E Preliminary Planting Plan File: 35mm Drawing# z <W no 0 w U = O' W 0: 2 �Q h=-= Z �. 1- 0. Z F- U0. 0 I-... H V', LL O • Z Uw Z M ,OO,PZ.6ti N • 1. N cris'on" W 252.10' z 0 pc2 I I\ 1 \ \ ,/ - _ - it. 2.112'36'00" W 252.10' . • • ; . • ' 48th AVENUE' SOUTH .."7••••13 .. . .. • • • • • ' • . • ; • • • • OA 1 2T3 6 INCH , :.1,11111111111111111111111101.11.1q1111111111illiii,011011111111111111.11114111111,111i111111111111.11ihRIPCIIIII011111111111111111 I File: L� 35mm Drawing�.. 11ARLEY-DAVIDSO\ TUKWILA, WASHINGTON WEST ELEV4TION ),2•• LLOINAPPO SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION VICINITY TO SCALE 48th AVENUE SOUTH SITE PLAN ACS File: mm Drawing ;r, PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME% COMMON NAME . SIZE,. : SPACING'' REMARKS Carpinus betulus'Fastigiate' European Hornbeam Uniform height,:full for(n • High Branchlnp', Adjacent zone: Commercial -Light Industrial Callum vulgarla'Alba Plena' Alba Plena Heather Camellia hiemalis 'Shishi- Gashira' Camellia: Comm stolonitera 'Kelseyii' Kelseyi Red -Twig Dogwood Rear Yard. Landscape: None 1 ..; 1 1/2' to 9' Width' Provided.:. •ice _�.,..._ _.�_,...--- �------' - --° C141.1) DOWNTOWN: HARLEY- DAVIDSO�V� Lavandula anguatlblia English Lavender . Foil form, " Prunus laurocaresus 'Otto Luyken's" Otto Luyken's Laurel Spfaea Japonica 'Anthony Waterer' Spiraea .?a.HIGH Street \;Tree, Typ at 20':0,p,.. Verifyt utUky tocation'and adjust tree'location. ., ei.:. �ta:Ot��iOU4 L U.4i QI(l,Ej�•.D swy�`nn rrr roj '.'`r''t y� ;„ v�. k`� -+i.�• '�. ,]g��y,i.r�'t �7 5'.0 Na'Y 9k.W 1'' '' r ?4cW!? 5 1a iii .'601 "r1FJiL'�i?1', ■ t d:' v�l bbb•': ,i�Ig1�1;4+ID. .�.. tt• .,.,.r. .., .. •era;. .. r. ,. r, �. .. _.. ��4;/ J t�,r Y/ // b � r, r Q? O 7N {I. 1 i >i,�.Iiii 4 N isiiii.r b .7 • :///../%1 �I ' . • ',� v-: n'(SRF 44T19S3/LV4SayflSlflr�c �J�FatNS7R/F '`{. w y...1, 4( T fib! , 1•:a r/ra'!, , L'� �71'J ' aOl!11�1 f' �`Df'+'1Q'.4 ar 1'.b * * NW: _ r � 6k?rifLQa-;�l` , ��, r.. iC✓ Q1r: `���,jw.d�t�JCJ��'�0:�~ <il.irsl r'b'111• �.P .. 1,I lf'I'Irl'I'I'1 l l'I I II'I'I I liI 1'IIIIIr�r� 111 111 I'1- i1�11'�'1111111� 1'I III11'lil J. ' � ' � . • 51 P1 El Zl ' Itr:-01` -��A, r..Y._�..L_.._9,.,;...f.. .'•P E L l'lho hIIIIAIIIIIIIIhIIIIOMII6IIII6IIIIIIIIiIIIIIU6llllllllkllg6llllll, I6llu4lllllll110111mllllllllllllll10 LALA • • File: '••••• • :35mnis • • ,r- RIDGE (.2V-8) EAVE (41S'-I01) BOTTOM OF CANOPY (4.) FINISH FLOOR (46") STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 1 1 ' i 11'1111 ri 1 I 1 1 i • , 1 • 1 11 1 . . . . , . . . . . . • . . . 1 i .1 1 11 IIII , i -------- IMMINIIIIIINIIMIIMIIIIMII11111111•••••••111•111•1•1111 - . . 1w. hhh_ A AIL. AI hio. 41 Ilk 1111,,gli. ' ilieritam 1121111 RIDGE (..29.-EP) EAVE (.15.-10.9 BOTTOM OF CANOPY (.9.2) FINISH FLOOR (46") WEST ELEVATION -MECHANICAL UNITS OVER ADDITION, TO BE SCREENED BY PARAPET 3.x24• ILLUMINATED WALL SIGN (•2 Q. FT.) (MAX. ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA • s8.4 sc. FT.) - C.ILASS BLOCK DENTIL (I) COURSE OF ' ' SMOOTH FACE BLOCK SPLIT-FACE CONCRETE BLOCK SOW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LITe SUBTENDED IN GRILLAGE FASCIA HREY-O ION Nr1 1 01111p ................... - .... ^ ........ ......... -7=7= . ..... ...... ........ - ..... ....... RIDGE (.2.3.-8'.) EAVE (•5'.10") FINISH FLOOR (46") SOUTH ELEVATION METAL SIDING GLASS BLOCK DENTIL (I) COURSE OF SI100T1-1 FACE BLOCK SPLIT FACE • CONCRETE BLOCK .......... 3850 \ REGISTERED ARCHITECT STATE 01: WASHINGTON -GRILLAGE FASCIA W/ COLUMN SUPPORT 4 GUY WIRES METAL SIDING - METAL CORNER TRIM, TYP. - .... ........ ......... ^ ....... NORTH ELEVATION ......... METAL CORNER TRIM, TYP. -WA:AAA= :11111111 ii IIII1 , • • 1 11 1 . . . . , . . . . . . • . . . 1 . 5 EAST ELEVATION .. ... ... .. ........ ..... ... .. . ..... ... 7-7=7 - ......... . - ... ..... ..... .. ............ ------- ............ .. - ------ .... ..... - ......... • . GLASS BLOCK DENTIL (I) COURSE OF r SHOOTN FACE BLOCK SPLIT-FACE CONCRETE BLOCK ‘.. ......... :;. .:., s7''':, Cl 1 , J.:4..,::-;..1.1'....:;....,',..".::.:.:411:e7.,:ii,," ;, C a i''. nb.o6 Iiiiihmlniihuiliiiiliffilmilinilimillulimilllilmilitilliouliolhoillinhililopinlioluilimillulliiihilimillill sew WiGu FItESSURE SODIUM WALL I•ACK, • TYPICAL • ...... ......... -^^ .. ....... ^ ...... • • . • . ArilpeAvviessT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE. t If I,.�" • • • : ..• . • ..... 1; • A File: 35 DWTOW■ II AR b E Y = B AY I B SO \ T U K W I L A , SHEET INDEX ACS Al A2 A3 COVER SHEET / SITE PLAN MAIN FLOOR PLAN UPPER FLOOR PLAN BUILDING ELEVATIONS PROJECT TEAM OWNER: ARCHITECT: CIVIL: STATISTICS RUSSELL AND JENNIFER TOM 6121 MARTIN LUTHER KING WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98118 CONTACT: RUSS (253) ROSS DECKMAN ARCHITECT 4121 S. MERIDIAN, SUITE 2B PUYALLUP, WA 98313 CONTACT: BILL BOWDISH (253) 840 -9405 DBM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 502 16TH ST. N.E., SUITE 312 AUBURN, WA 98002 CONTACT: DANA MOWER (253) 851 -0924 PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: SITE USE: ZONE, SITE AREA SETBACKS: FRONT, SIDE, INTERIOR: SIDE, STREET: REAR HEIGHT: CODE, OCCUPANCY, CONSTRUCTION TYPE, BUILDING AREA PARKING: DOUNTOLLN HARLEM- DAVIDSON ,13001 48TH STREET AVE. 5. RETAIL / VEHICLE REPAIR I MAINTENANCE C/LI DISTRICT 13,893 SF.t (1.T0tACRES) 25' 5' 12.5' 5' 45' MAX. 1951 UBC B,M V -N WITH FIRE SPRINKLER MAIN FLOOR+ 20,812.6 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR: 13222.6 SO. FT. TOTAL, 34,0352 SO. FT. PARKING REQUIRED: 13,152.9 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE/ MANUFACTURING I STALL PER I 000 SQ. FT. • 139 STALLS 202522 SQ. FT. RETAIL /OFFICE 25 STALLS PER 1,000 SQ. FT. • 50b STALLS TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED • 65 66 STALLS PROVIDED - I VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACE (8'x20' -6" 31/ 8' -6" WIDE LOADING AREA) - 2 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (8'x20' -6" W/ 5' WIDE LOADING AREA) - Il COMPACT SPACES (8' -6 "x16') - 46 REGULAR SPACES (8' -6 "'x19') WA S H. I N. G T 0 N LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER AND C. C. LEWIS DONATION CLAIMS IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOLLNSNIIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WM. IN KING COUNTY, , WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40'01'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 520.15 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE P.1. OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMI544 RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, NOW PAVED, SAID P.I. BEING APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET EAST AND 20 FEET 501T14 OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, THENCE NORTH 45'24' WEST ON A LINE 15000 FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD A DISTANCE OF 835.00 FEET TO A POINT UI41014 BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 15511 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID END OF CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET NORTH A•0 440 FEET (LEST CF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15, • THENCE SOUTH 40' 36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 2000 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY, THENCE NORTH 45'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 16.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 45'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 310,21 FEET, THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 102.10 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 31021, THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 902.10 FEET TO THE POINT CF BEGINNING, . TOGETHER WITH A PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH•EXTENDING FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 635 FEET ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PUUGET, SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING IDENTICAL WITH THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY, EXCEPT THAT PORTION OP THE STEPHEN FOSTER AND C.C. LEWIS DONATION CLAIMS IN SECTIONS 1.4 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WM., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40'01'05" WEST A DISTANCE' OF 920.15 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE P.I. OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER ' LINE OF THE DUWAMISN RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, NOW PAVED, SAID P.I: BEING APPROXIMATELY 100E FEET EAST AND•20 FEET SOUTH. OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOLLNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, THENCE NORTH 45'24' (LEST ON A LINE 150 .00 FEET DISTANT FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD A DISTANCE OF 83500 FEET TO A POINT lU -ITCH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.19 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID END OF. CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15, THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 20 .00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE FUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY, THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 16.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 45'24' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 31021 FEET, THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 450 FEET, , THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 31021, THENCE SOUTH 40'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 450 FEET TO THE POINT OF `BEGINNING, EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR 48TH AVENUE SOUTH. VICINITY MAP 8' -0• HIGH SPLIT -FACE "CONCRETE BLOCK ENCLOSURE'. N y -r•�• �_• I—. 40'36'0" -x _ 0' 252.1 DUMPSTER/ RECYCLING l SINGLE LAMP, 100W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT, APPROX. 20' HIGH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MOTORCYCLE' PARKING ��,LOADING ^AREA•;11 SEW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM WALL PACK 96.6 3850 REGISTERED ARCHITECT • C C 504 HIGH PRESSURE • SODIUM WALL PACK • C LANDSCAPE SINGLE P ".O=L 25' -0" L I9' -0" DOUBLE LAMP,TI00W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHT, APPROX. 20' HIGH i t 25'- 0 "A+�- u- ]� =0 ^:= j5' 18 -g•I 0 SE LANDSCAPE PLANTER GRILLAGE ABOVE SEW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM WALL PACK SINGLE LAMP, 100E HIGH PRESSURE. SODIUM LIGHT, • APPROX 20' HIGH'. 24' -8 V8" S 133RD ST BIO- SIUALE N 40'36'00• 252.10' : SIGN LOCATION,, 2'.6IDES • AT 16 6Q. FT. MAX EACH ' SIDE.MAX.,SIGN HEIGHT.;' ', 10•'4' ":_10:.'.16•1 ]6' :..:.� IIII'III II IIIII 11111111 II IIThI� JI1hIl1ITIIT111iihIh1hT1 li11 II11111I11L�.,i11'IT('j' I.'ITI'�liPll�,. INCH 1 .t1,72zr;-.. •h+•- .• ?:. 1".7:7 � "• ... 5 6 CHINA d ..: ':' : . St Pt El Zl ) .. .I:iSl ::O_a.;,L,,;y:.9„t,;,p� ► E Z 1`16'0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIpIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IpIIIRILIpI�11llpllllW�IllllpllhRl�Rllllll1�111111111� 1 Roof Fudge__..... -, • 30'•I.1/2'' Save Piarapre 19•0,1 STANDING 'SEAM - METAL ROOF ••Sand color Roof ridges...._.__ Parapet wall • • Alrnorid color -• Parapet metal cap • •Almond color -- •P6repet wall -• Almond color -- Parapet metal cap ••Almond color •- -- -STANDING SEA/1 METAL ROCf - -Sena color 3850 \-REGliTERE-D1 ARCHITECT ROSS E. DECKMAN STATE OF WASHINGTON Top _ Conc. or curb _ 0' -0. West Elevation -•- (d) COURSES OF SPI_IT•FACE CCNC.RETE ( At rliw addition • -- Natural color • - -- GLASS BLOCK DENTIL --• -•-• (3) COURSE OF SMOOTH- FACE CONCRETE BLOCK • -Natural color _- - .•1•1•1__•1.. - (1) COURSES OF SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE BLOCK ••Natural color SOW HIGH PRESSURE? SODIUM -'- -� LIGHTS SUSPENDED IN GRILLAGE FASCIA -- GRILLAGE FASCIA WI COLUMN SUPPORT 1 GUT WIRES METAL SIDING -- - -. -- Almond color METAL CORNER TRIM, I rF' •- ••Almond color -- (a) COURSES Of SPLIT•FACE CONCRETE BLOCK i At. new addition ) -.Natural color Root Ridge 30'- l -I/2" Eave 20' -0" Parapet 191•0" Second Floor 12' -10 -- MECHANICAL UNITS OVER ADDITION,'TO BE SCREENED BT PARAPET 3144' ILLUMINATED WALL SIGN (12 SO. FT.) (MAX. ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA • SS SO. FT.) --- 3 12 . I; , I IITAIMIDYAVA FAINT. 3 MECHANICAL UNITS OVER — ADDITION, TO BE SCREENED ST PARAPET I FABRIC - MESHED SCREENED • •-- (8) COURSES OF SPLIT•FACE CONCRETE BLOCK ( At new addition ) -.Natural color • --Almond color •- -• GLASS BLOCK PENT IL --•- -• (3) COURSE OF SMOOTH -FACE CONCRETE BLOCK -- Natural color -•1-_•1•1•1__. (1) COURSES OF SPLIT•FACE CONCRETE BLOCK -- Natural color . . 6010 metal door - --- STARTER COURSE - 260 WA!' HIGH PRESSURE (TO BE CUT TO A ") METAL SIDING SODIUM BLDG. LIGHT ' --Almond color (3) AT THI6ELEVATIOF North E Ievat i on CMU CAP COURSE • (3) COURSE OF • ----- SMOOTH- FACE CONCRETE BLOCK •'-- Natural color ''(1) COURSES SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE BLOCK -- Natural color . • • • rem46•1r.•10•10•1s•1046..•1m.... .......r.s.... YMMIW..wwIVNIS •.......r..w..e.eum GLAa6 BLOGK,PENTIL , (8).COitase CF ' ;• :.: , • . . 6MOOTI4 •FACE CONCRETE DLOCK -- Natural, color • --•-- f1) cOUR6ES OF• . SPLIT- FACE,CONGEaETE' BLOCK ( Natural ea�or IDm. WATT NIGF(•PRE69URF- .' ()oolu1M BLDG• LGHT' ; • ,' !`(8) AT.. THI6. ELEVATION:', It • METAL SIDING --- - ,ALend color. • • _METAL OILIER TRIM, TTP. -- -- Almond color 113.99 revised parapet b'pa,'olelei. ,ievls.d floor'hil# lt. i building roar / per cNg.bullaing•,yit.mo, Inc. . - added buH ilkitei-ghting;/ Fr r'vwn. ': 6.23.99 added grillage at pa corfsr•l p.r �/�' ... ... �. , .� . � •: � •1•1:•1•1 �. i�• ' -. addition of oil conT•r •aor .! west% area, now uilndau!"l. at ofnc. I / per owner gXTERIO ?• EL4VATIONS IIII '11IIIIIIII1rIT.IITiIIIlilii i iiiiIll1IIIIIrIIIIjIIIiIi II li_�rlT i1i III{jljrfrI IIIull�llijll T. . °M tit I 6~7<Y-- „'r,:,:i•.a';�:!..t_ —,- -.' 6 6 61 Fl Cl at . ,..:•a4s:a.w LI_.:-.,...L Eae.:,.aP..,...F e a l`R-a6 ImduulmlhudmlilmhulluullilillildulllmdllllllluhullpulllllplldulliullhmhNlluldludolllnnhmmRlRRIRRI . 1 PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING REMARKS Acer Rubrum Red Sunset Red Sunset Maple 2" caliper min. 2" caliper min. 1 gal. - _. 5 gal. 1 gal. 4 Cane min. _.- 1 gal. 1 gal. 5 gal. 5 gal. 5 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 1 gal. 5 gal. • 40' o.c. max. 20' o.c. max 3' o.c. — 5' o.c. 3' o.c. V o.c. 3' oz. Uniform height, full form High branching — Carpinus betulus 'Fastigiate' • European Hornbeam Uniform height, lull form Calluna vulgarls 'Alba Plena' Alba Plana Heather - • Camellia hiemalls 'ShIshi-Gashira' Camellia Cornus stolonerilera 'Keiseyil' Kelsey] Red-Twig Dogwood -------- — Erica tarns 'King George' King George Heath Erica carnea 'Winter Beauty' Winter BeautHealh Escallonla lanleyensis 'Apple Blossom' Escallonia —_--- . Euonymus alatus 'Compacta' Dwarf Burning Bush Juniperus chinensis 'Gold Coast' • Junlperus horlzontalls 'Blue Chip' Lavandula angustilolla PotentIlia.fruticosa Shrubby Cinquefoil Full form Full form Full form Full form Full form 5' o.c. 5' o.c. 5' o.c. 3' o.c. 3' o.c. 3' o.c. 5' o.c. Full form Full form Full form • Full form Full form Full form Prunus laurocerasus 'Otto Luyken's' • Otto Luyken's Laurel Full form Spiraea Japonica 'Anthony Waterer' Spiraea 1 gal. 3' o.c. Full form Viburnum davldll Viburnum 1 gal. • 3' o.c. . Full form Lawn Sod — Rye Grass Blend PLANTING NOTES 1. Contractor shall be responsible for familiarizing himself with all other site improvements prior to starting landscape work. 2. Contractor shall use caution while excavating to avoid disturbing any existing underground utilities. If active utilities are encountered, contractor Is to promptly advise General Contractor and Owner. 3. Contractor shall maintain and water plant material until owner's final acceptance is received in writing. 4. Contractor shall be responsible for providing the quantity of plants that are represented by symbols on the drawing. • 5. Contractor shall be responsible for computing specific quantities of groundcover, and plant material utilizing on-center spacing for plants as shown on plant schedule and minimum planting distances as specified below. 6. Ground cover shall be planted in'equilateral triangular spacing pattern at the on- center distances as shown. Where ground cover abuts curbing, walkways, signs or poles, minimum planting distance shall be 12 from center of plant to curbing, walks, etc. Minimum planting distances shall be 15" from center of all trees. 7. Subgrade to within 1/10 foot provided by General Contractor at the following: a. Planting beds: 6" below finish grade ' b. Sod lawn areas: 6" below finish grade 8. Provide topsoil rototilled to a depth to 12" below finish grade as follows. a. Planting beds: 6" depth of topsoil : • . b. Sod lawn areas: 6"depth of topsoil • 9• Topsoil shall be a mix of organic matter and soil (composted sawdust, manure, sandy loam and loam soils) with emandements as recommended by soil testing lab. azsogra tgs 10. Lawn finish grade shall be flush with adjacent sidewalk or back of curb grade' , 4:NNE AS „ REQUIRED. 1 -1 depth mulch In all planting beds. 12. All plant material shall be fertilized per manufactures specifications and soil testing recommendations. Side Yard Landscape:----2--- / Adjacent zone:. , Commercial-Light Industrial Adjacent zone: Commercial-Light Industrial / 8' High Split-Face Concrete Block / Encl „: . .Front Yard LandscExpe: 12:5' Required , Proposed Sidewalk 1 VI4d-th Pro \iided • ' • ' ' • I , • Rear Yard Landscape: None Required: ' 1 1/2' to 9' Width Provided. Rocks SINGLE LAMP 100W . HIGH PRESSURE ; SODIUM LIGHT, ' APPROX. 20' HIGH • HARLEY-DAVIDSON. REFER TO ARCHITECT SET. , Side Yard Landscape: —5' Required. ' Width Provided. DOUBLE LAMP 100 FRESSURE UM LIGHT, X. 20' HIGH 13. All plant material shall conform to AAN standard for nursery stock, latest edition. 14. Submit four representative subsoil samples and one topsoil sample to a qualified ' testing laboratory. Test for ornamental planting requirements. /-FILMBEd.1110SE BLACK.. D /—DEZZETOIIBLE Mr STAUB DOUGLASFIN (2) SIANDAlig BROWN -11847 TREE AT 752 REMOVE BINDER TWINE AND MEL TOP la OF BURLAP AWAY .-no' 1100TBALL PUMP MULCH TAPER TO CROWN aIIwyn BASIN ;11N1511ORADE TOPSOIL u I \ -11 . ----- TREE PLANTING NTS klittzLE` ROUGHEN ALL ./...----kITRFACES OF UNDISTURBED WIVE SOIL WA{ MST WIRE LOOP TO 'WRAP WIRE AROUND TWIST *TAKEO. TWIST IL CUT TKINTEN WIRE ON SNIDE OF STABS WIRE DETAIL 5' Required. ' 8' Width Provided. Street Tree, Typ. at 20' o.c. Verify utility location and adjust tree location. - iErCAOWN(If PLANT AT FINISH GRADE r-ROOT BALL r LAYER MULCH TAPER c-io crown • mucoirmon 'CUT TIOOT MASS TO I IAA 11.-' TOPSOIL BACSFILL STIMULATE NEW ROOTS — TOPIL SO (NOVEL FERTILIZE 2 TIMES FKKTIBALL DIAIFETER''' WOMEN ALL 5W1FACES tfaill■ED OF TIM PIT GROUND COVER PLANTING UNDISTURBED NATIVE BOIL NTS SHRUB PLANTING NTS -"SINGLE LAMP 100W HIGH PRESSURE , —SODIUM LIGHT, APPROX, 20' HIGH djacent zone: ilo• Commercial-Light Industrial • • • 11) MAYER MULCH TAPER TOCROWN ............. ................... /Elioswa$4See Architectig;;;;;; ""///Z:ii::::" /::iii:::i" 4c...... 07,77777 /1...17. .1 -irlo,$.0 t.:--k,.. '33 1,70 W/C. Qi.,• ortICN ; . ;;•.••.. s: • 48th Avenue ' • L - 4', 1 0 20' 40' 60' North .. • R74: 1 el C Z ir3:Z5 DOWNTOWN HARLEY- DAVIDSON alith Avenue South & Interurban . Tukwila, Washington MU .R.W,Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 710 Hoge Building . r • 705 Second Avenue Seattle Washington 98104 TeleFpahan162g1662. 4.6239 planning://Drwta.00m Jurisdiction: City of Tukwila ...1:JUL 2 9 1999 . • ISSUED • ;' REVISIONS 2 A • • VI. SHUT TITLE 70898 Final! Planting Plan IS4EET1 F2 41 q;=Oael hen,. ftirgi