Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L98-0061 - CARLYLE INC - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTL98 -0061 CARLYLE WAREHOUSE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPEMNT ADDITION 6801 So. 180th St. March 18, 1999 Dear Mr Deininger: Sincerely, John Deininger, Architect AIA 4128 W Ames Lake Dr NE Redmond WA 98053 Alice Kelly, Shorelafids Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program AMK:amk SDP.DOC cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L98 -0061 CARLYLE INC - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Permit # 1999 -NW -10013 If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to remodel and construct an 8,250 sq ft addition to an existg warehouse, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on March 04, 1999. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day appeal period, March 25, 1999. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. z J U: UO ` ui w= J w : w 0 Q . _a w . z = - O Z I— ww U Ui w - z = 0 1 z A F F I D A V I T V rom 1\1 byv O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fl Planning Commission Agenda Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: 1 . 115Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on 9 4,,yA S-oAxrke W Name of Project File Number / q r —v O Determination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ❑ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice LI Notice of Action • Official Notice • Other f Other Signature - Z H W re u6= U O N 0 w= -J E... 0) u_ u O u_ Q = a. w z F.. t- O Z I- w uj 2 0 o O 52 ' . Z U • z U N L z A F F I D A V I T LI Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Packet fl Board of Packet Q Planning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda LI Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit Name of Project O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: LI Determination of Non - significance fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance LI Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice LI Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on WGUL11,04 -e Signature File Number ( -71- CS —f, (k_cz (Zok.92_0/6r%P-7,--- CL w` u� m. U � o w F w ° < co a . w H = z � z o w n 0 w ; m ill H U U. P • lit z 0 H F_ ., 0 z Project: File Number: Applicant: Owner: Request: Associated Permits: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Staff: Attachments: City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Department of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 1, 1999 Carlyle Warehouse Addition L98 -0061 - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Carlyle, Inc. Carlyle, Inc. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to construct an 8,250 square foot addition to an existing office complex SEPA Review, determination issued February 23, 1999 Design Review Tukwila Urban Center Tukwila Urban Center Michael Jenkins A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application Site Plan Existing and proposed floor plan Landscape Plan Building elevations Shoreline Cross - sections (3 sheets) Riverbank cross section analysis dated December 8, 1998 by Sadler /Barnard Site Reconnaissance dated December 9, 1998 by Earth Consultants SEPA Determination 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 L98 -0061 - Shoreline Permit Carlyle, Inc. Warehouse Addition March 1, 1999 FINDINGS Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (18.44.80) Any substantial development within 200 feet of any shoreline must receive a shoreline z substantial development permit prior to issuance of any local permits by the City. z �w The proposal by Carlyle, Inc. is to construct an 8,250 square foot addition to an existing office building. The addition will provide warehouse and distribution space for the applicant. o o Attachment A is the application for a Shoreline Permit. Attachments B and C are the Site Plan UJ and Floor Plans for the project, indicating that the project falls within 200 feet of the Mean High Water Mark (MHWM) of the Duwamish/Green River. w o General Shoreline Regulations (18.44.1101 g co 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying district = 1 . - . w Z = The project is a permitted use in its zone, subject to Design Review approval by the Board of z o Architectural Review (BAR). Attachment D is the Landscape Plan and Attachment E is the w in building elevations that will be evaluated in the Design Review process. The height of the new v a building is 24 feet. The building will be located in both the Low Impact and High Impact o - environments of the Shoreline, as the leading edge of the building is 90 feet from the OHWM. w 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master L!- p program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations: U =. Policy 5.1.1: In the Urban -Open Space Environment, priority shall be given to...Redevelopment 17- 1— of existing commercial and industrial areas, with enhanced access to the river. The proposal includes the remodeling of an existing 54,000 square foot office space to accommodates distribution and warehousing for a tenant. The proposal will not affect the existing outside patio immediately adjacent to the project Policy 5.5.1: Require that shoreline development outside of the MIC...reflects principles of high - quality design in such areas as site planning, architecture and landscaping The project is subject to Design Review (TMC 18.60) due to its proximity to the Shoreline and that uses in the Tukwila Urban Center (TMC 18.28) in excess of 2,500 square feet are required to be reviewed and approved by the BAR. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structures protects or promotes the public interest. N/A 2 L98 -0061 - Shoreline Permit Carlyle, Inc. Warehouse Addition March 1, 1999 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit. No disruption of existing vegetation in the river environment is anticipated. Attachment F is the Shoreline Cross - sections for the site. Attachments G and H are the Riverbank analysis and Site Reconnaissance for the project. S. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. No discharge of effluent will occur due to proposal. 6. All States and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with N/A 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river shall be protected Wildlife should not be impacted by this project. 8. All perimeters of landfills and other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls, or other satisfactory mechanism for erosion prevention. N/A 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from Federal, State, County or municipal agencies. The applicant obtained a SEPA Determination of Non - significance, dated February 23, 1999, as indicated in Attachment I. The applicant must receive approval of the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) prior to submitting for Flood Control Zone, Land Altering and other development permits. The application is scheduled for a hearing before the BAR on March 25, 1999. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. N/A 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline N/A 3 L98 -0061 - Shoreline Permit Carlyle, Inc. Warehouse Addition March 1, 1999 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the shoreline N/A 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation z to the owner �z � w D u6 N/A _. 0 o 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel, unless such landfill is co o determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public w _ U) u_ interest. w O 2 N/A • a co 15. Notwithstanding any provisions of the Code to the contrary, removal of any I c� _ cottonwood tree within the river environment, or the low impact environment, which ? F .. tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be z oO subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. w w U a No tree removal is anticipated. o P o h tu in Specific Shoreline Regulations u. - F TMC 18.44.140 provides specific regulations concerning new development in the Low Impact id z Environment of the Shoreline. r... 0 z 1. The low impact environment shall contain no uses other than those allowed in the river environment and the following: a. Structures not to exceed 35 feet in height, excluding utility towers; b. Parking /loading and storage facilities adequately screened or landscaped; c. Railroad lead and spur trackage or public or private roads; d. Utilities, including towers; e. Signs not to exceed regulations of the underlying zoning district sign code. The proposed building will be 28 feet in height. The proposal includes the reconfiguration of an existing paved surface. Landscaping has been proposed for the building portion of the site. The project must also comply with Design Review Guidelines (TMC 18.60), including approval by the BAR. 2. Low impact environment uses shall conform to the following standards: a. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations; 4 DECISION Approval of the application with the following conditions: 1. Steven Lancaster, Director of Community Development L98 -0061 - Shoreline Permit Carlyle, Inc. Warehouse Addition March 1, 1999 b. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking /loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; c. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: (1) A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six-foot height, or (2) Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or (3) Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or (4) Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking /loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. As previously indicated, the proposal must receive approval by the BAR prior to the issuance of a building permit. The BAR approves the site plan, landscape plan and building elevations. The applicant has proposed new landscape comprised of Austrian Pine, Arborvitae and Pacific Wax Myrtle to screen the east and south portions of the building. No landscaping has been proposed for the loading platform an related access area. The existing landscape plan will not be altered. The proposed landscape along the south and east portion for the building shall be extended to screen the truck loading portion of the project. Mkvac.ki I 1555 DATE ■• ` . z • o O co 0 LU J = CO IL w 0 co J F_ w z F Z LL! uj 0 O D o I— w w U . O li .Z O 1— z Shoreline Management Act of 1971 • PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L98 -0061 Status: I'S'SUED A p p l i e d : 09/ Approved: 03/02/1999 E.xpir•ation: 03/01/2001 Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to: CARLYLE INC to undertake the following development: SHORELINE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION A 8,250 SO FT WAREHOUSE/ DISTRIBUTION BUILDING,..._. upon the following property: Address: 6801 SJ80 : ST Parcel No: 362304' -9087 Sec /Twn /Rnoe: The follOW,ing-master prograM%provisions are applicable to development: URBAN= Development pursuant to' thi:: pe r•mi t snail be ..under taF,e'.n .pursuant ;t`o the attach'e*.term's and cond.i t s, rc This. permit i ;`gr'anted ` pursua'nt th to the Shoreline Management Ac :t o,f 1971. an nothing 1',n is:' permit shall excuse,'the appli�ttrtt frc+m coripliance: with any other Federal, °'St`ate }r; • local statutes. :ordinanc or r•e+ 0at ions • applicable; to thi pro ect. but not, ;inconsi :'tent , with" the hor,e:;l;,ine Management . Act`s(Chapter• 90.5 ` RCW) This permit mav be r•e: c:"i.nded pursuant t to RCW :?f 58. 1,4,0 (0) in. event the permittee tails. to %compiv� with the terms or conditions` hereof. CONSTRUCTION ; TO TFIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR AS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -O ( 21) DAYS FROM = THE : DATE OF FILING , THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY A. DEFINEDIN RCW 90, 58. 140 (6) AND WAC 173 --14 -090. OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS: INLTIATED"`WITHINWENTY -ONE: DAY'S FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED, , EXCEPT AS PROVIDED' =IN 0.50. 140(5) (a) (b) (c:) Date: 't THE PR0P.OSED PROJECT 4ILL `BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN REEN RIVER AND ,ITS' ASCCsCIATED...WETLANDS WHICH I'S' A;,'_,HOREL,INE OF,'STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE, AND °IS D ESIGNATED ,A'S AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT: Steve Lancaster. Director, Planning'Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two .years from date of issuance, per WAC. 17'3 -14 -060. z Z � W 6 J U 0 W J 1 W O. �QQ u. co = d. I -W _. z I ... I- O ZI U ❑ 0 — ❑ I- W w ` 2 I- I- : ui - z - _, 0 H z Address: 6301 S 130 ST Suite: Tenant:: Type: P-SHORE Parcel #: 3.62304-9087 Status: ISSUED Applied: 09/22/1993 Issued: 03/02/1999 A******klickkkkk***kkkk**Akki(* **kk . kk**k**AkA***kkkk*k**kk*?rlekk*A44,41(14*****kk** Permit Conditions: 1. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ALONG THE SOUTH AND EAST PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE EXTENDED TO SCREEN THE TRUCK LOADING PORTION OF THE PROJECT. CITY OF TUKWILA Permit No: L98-0061 =;:, ;■;:;■ " February 26, 1999 John Deininger 4128 West Ames Lake Drive, N.E. Redmond, WA Re: Carlyle Warehouse Addition, 6801 S. 180th Street Dear John: In preparation for the March 25, 1999 Board of Architectural Review (BAR) hearing on this project, I will need additional copies of plans you have submitted. The additional copies will be needed for the BAR review materials as well as for the general public. They are as follows: • 8 copies of the 12/21 Cover Sheet rendering • 8 copies of the 2/8 Site Plan • 8 copies of the 2/8 Landscape Plan • 10 copies of the 12/21 Building Elevations I will also need 1 set of 8 1/2 x 11 inch reductions of the plans detailed above. These are used for archive purposes. By the time you receive this letter, you should have received the February 23, 1999 SEPA determination. If you have not received this determination (the project received a DNS), please contact me. The Shoreline Permit is currently under review by the Director of Community Development. I anticipate this permit will be issued by March 2, 1999. Once it is issued I will send it to you. I will need the additional sheets outlined above by March 11, 1999. Thank you for your ongoing cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Faz (206) 431-3665 John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director • Air • Water City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins Date: February 22, 1999 Re: E98 -0023, SEPA review for construction of a new 8,250 square foot warehouse for Carlyle, Inc., 6810 S. 180th Street. Project Description: This SEPA review is for the construction of an 8,250 square foot warehouse addition to an existing 54,000 square foot one story office building. The addition will include improvements to the impervious surface to allow for trucks to access the warehouse facility. The entire site is generally flat with silty sand and topsoil in the general area. The project includes reduction and replacement of impervious surface to create a truck loading area for the new warehouse. Approximately 70% of the entire parcel will have impervious surface following construction. The applicant has indicated that haybales will be used to reduce or control erosion during construction. Emissions will occur from construction vehicles during construction. No other impacts are anticipated Project is located within Shoreline Management Zone. A Substantial Shoreline Development Permit (TMC 18.44) is required prior to construction. No dredging or filling from surface water or wetlands. No discharge of waste materials to surface waters will occur. No withdraw or discharge of groundwater will occur. All construction in and around existing drainage field(s) must comply with Tukwila's Storm Water Management Ordinance. Approximately 2,100 square feet of impervious surface will be removed and replaced with grass while approximately 1,400 square feet of new impervious surface will be added to create the truck loading area. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 E98 -0023 SEPA Checklist - Carlyle, Inc. 6810 S. 180th Street February 22, 1999 • Plants z A landscape plan has been submitted with the land use applications that includes planting of new grass area and new evergreen shrubbery. A Riverbank Stability Analysis and Site Reconnaissance were submitted concerning the general site conditions along the Green D River channel bank. No removal or impact to existing vegetation area is anticipated. Any o ny o o co 0 f trees within a Shoreline area requires a Tree Permit (TMC 18.54) • w • Animals co w w 2 No animals found in the area. The site is within 200 feet of the Crean /D w mi Ri th provides habitat for species currently under consideration for listing under the Endangered �a Species Act. u) D = a I -w • Energy/Natural Resources z= 1- 0 Energy will be used for the construction of the new warehouse. The new facility will be zt- w heated with electric heat. Some new exterior lighting will be installed. � o U O a l- w w . Some construction noise will occur. The construction of the warehouse will result in noise F- o — O produced through new truck trips that will service the facility. z U � F-2 O H z • Environmental Health • Land /Shoreline Use Development is located in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zone. Project includes the construction of a new 8,250 square foot warehouse /distribution building. Project will include the reconfiguration of an existing parking area for a truck loading area. The project must be approved by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) prior to the issuance of a building permit. The project must also receive a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit prior to obtaining a Building Permit, as it is within 200 feet of the Green /Duwamish River. No demolition of structures is proposed. • Housing No impacts. • Aesthetics The project is subject to Design Guidelines (TMC 18.60) and approval by the BAR prior to issuance of a building permit. The BAR will review the site plan, building elevations, landscape plan and other components to ensure compliance with Design Guidelines. E98 -0023 SEPA Checklist - Carlyle, Inc. 6810 S. 180th Street February 22, 1999 • Transportation Recommendations: DNS z • Light and Glare Q I z F. w re Lighting plan will be required as part of the Design Review process. The applicants have 2 indicated that exterior wall mount lighting will be installed over the truck loading area and 6 o ' the southeast portion of the building. , w o W =, • Recreation i �. wo No impact to existing facility. N 5 u_ • Historic /Cultural Preservation N I a I- in No known places or landmarks. zi._ r=o z I- D o There will be no elimination of the existing 250 on -site parking spaces. The project will o = include the construction of a truck loading area, to be used in conjunction with the O I- warehouse. No new streets will be created. The facility will generate truck trips that do not m 0 currently exist. p Cu z • Public Services ,ci _ o �' Proposed development will not impact or require specific public services. z • Utilities The facility will be served by electric and telephone services. February 10, 1999 ? January 15, 1999 Dear John: City of Department o John Deininger, AIA 4128 West Ames Lake Drive, NE Redmond, WA 98053 Re: Carlyle Warehouse ad • ition, 6801 S. 180th kvvila John W. Rants, Mayor Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director As you know, your applicatio s for Design Review, Substantial Shoreline Development Permit and SEPA were dete ned to be complete on December 30, 1999 based upon the additional plans you submitte• on December 21, 1998. I have done a preliminary revi -w of these plans and am requesting that the following revisions be made, to comply with City codes: • The turning radius for Fire Department access at commercial uses is 81 feet. The 100 foot radius indicated on your plans exceeds this requirement, resulting in potential encroachment into the Riv r Environment portion of the Shoreline. Please revise your plans to meet the 81 oot standard. A copy of the standard is attached. • The landscape plan must b signed and stamped by a Washington State licensed Landscape Architect. • The current landscape pl does not provide enough clear delineation between existing and proposed pl ting. In addition, there are no planting or species notes indicated for the proposed planting. Please revise accordingly. • A lighting plan for the new ortion of the building should be provided as part of the Site or Landscape Plan. Lighting plans are typically required as part of a complete application. The lighting plan should show placement, type of lighting, height of any support structures and associated candle power, especially given the location of the proposed structure in relat_on to the Shoreline. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #106 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4131.3670 • Fax (206) 431 - 3665 January 15, 1999 John Deininger, AIA Re: Carlyle Warehouse addition Page Two As you will recall, the Notice of Application has been was mailed to surrounding properties on January 11, 1999. I have enclosed a copy for your files. The Notice of Application calls for Public Comment on these applications until February 4, 1999. During this time period there may be more comments from City Departments like those detailed above. If similar comments are provided that require changes to the plans or additional information to be submitted, I will contact you. I would like to have these revisions by the close of the Public Comment period, as referenced. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact meat (206) 431- 3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner _1- � w 6 ,J U CO W= ;. H . U) u_ w g Q � uj . z � rr 0 Z I uj co U 0 N w ci h — -0 : .Z CU 0 1— z A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N CThr hereby declare that: ,"J Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda. Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit f c" �l I was - ai3-ed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project ( lr�V ..e 1■ �. File Number c'l " C . c[cc— 0 Determination of Non - significance fJ Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action 0 Official Notice 0 Other 0 Other Signature w re f 00' "CO z` F-; w 0 . 2 ga = I -w z � I— 0 w U :O '0 H: w w — O U cn z FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED JANUARY 11, 1999 The following applications have been submitted for review and decision. John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director L98 -0060 (Design Review) L98 -0061 (Shoreline Development Permit) E98 -0023 (SEPA Checklist) Carlyle, Inc. 6801 S. 180th Street Construction of an 8,200 square foot addition to an existing building Development Permit Land Altering Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on February 4, 1999. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on February 25, 1999. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the hearing is still scheduled for this date. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431 -3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 - 3670 • Fax (206) 431 - 3665 December 30, 1998 John Deininger, A.I.A. 4128 W. Ames Lake Drive, N.E. Redmond, WA 98053 Dear Mr. Deininger: Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments . Response to Design Review Guidelines PROJECT DESIGN REVIEW L98 -0060 Carlyle Inc. Proposed Warehouse 6801 S.180 St. Tukwilla, WA JOHN DEININGER ARCHITECT A.I.A. 4128 W. AMES LK. DR. NE. REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98053 TEL - 425 880 4881 FAX - 425 880 4455 RECEIVED DEC 21 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE SITE IS FLAT WITH EXISTING COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE ONE STORY IN HEIGHT AND PROPOSED WAREHOUSE ADDITION WILL OCCURR ON REAR OF BUILDING AND BE ONE STORY IN HEIGHT. THE SCALE OF THE ADDITION WILL BE APPROIMATELY 1/7 OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS FLOOR AREA 8200 TO 54000 SQ.FT. RELATIONSHIP TO ADJOINING AREA SITE IS BUFFERED BY THE GREEN RIVER ON THREE SIDES WITH A DIKE STRUCTURE AND HEAVY PLANT COVER. ADJOINING AREAS ARE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES. PRIMARILY WAREHOUSE AND ADJOINING OFFICE STRUCTURES. PROPOSED WAREHOUSE WILL BE A LOGICAL AND COMPATIBLE USE FOR THE ZONE AND SURROUNDING AREA. CIRCULATION AND PARKING PATTERNS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND WILL NOT BE ALTERED. BUILDING SITE IS A VACANT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM SURROUNDS THE PROPERTY AND WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY PROPOSED WAREHOUSE ADDITION. LANDSCAPE & SITE TREATMENT LANDSCAPING EXISTS AND IS MATURE AND HEALTHY CERTAIN PLANT SPECIES WILL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE PROPOSED WAREHOUSE PERIMETER TO ADD TEXTURE, COLOR AND ENHANACE EXTERIOR WALLS. YARD LIGHTING EXISTS AND WILL BE REINFORCED BY DOWNLIGHTING OVER DELIVERY DOORS. BUILDING DESIGN PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BE A MIX OF STUCCO AND METAL PANELS AND PAINTED A SIMILAR COLOR TO EXISTING BLDG. THE MIX OF SMOOTH SURFACE WILL BE COMPATIBLE TO THE SMOOTH TEXTURE OF THE EXISTING PAINTED CONCRETE PANELS WITH THE RIBBED METAL SIDING PANELS ADDING TEXTURE AND SHADOW LINES. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS (TUC) TUKWILA URBAN CENTER THE OVERALL INFRASTRUCTURE OF THIS SITE IS ESTABLISHED INCLUDING THE PARKING, VEHICULAR CIRCULATION, LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. THE OVERALL AMBIANCE OF THE SETTING IS MUCH LIKE A CAMPUS OF BUILDINGS. TWO FRONT BUILDINGS ARE OCCUPIED BY WELLS FARGO BANKING AND THE THIRD BUILDING BY CARLYLE INC. THE BUILDINGS CREATE A COMPOUND, SERVED BY A PRIVATE DRIVE AND LANDSCAPED WITH LARGE MATURE TREES AND FOILAGE. THIS COMPOUND IS SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES BY THE GREEN RIVER AND ACCENTUATED BY A DIKE AND WALKING TRAIL OWNED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILLA. THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL OCCUPY A PORTION OF THE EXISTING REAR DELIVERY YARD OF THE CARLYLE BLDG AND WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE EXISTING QUIET AND PLEASANT NATURE OF THE SITE. THE NEW ADDITION AND THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS EXCEED THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THIS PARTICULAR ZONE DESIGNATION. z � L AI JU O 0 co 0 111 i '. J 1- � L wO S2 a 1- • w I z1 1- O Z w U • � O N' O I-- W W. 1 U '. Z W 0 z •Y :lSZ a3aa i 2S °to""` City of Tukwila Lag d1 Descriation of ?edestrian Trail through Tukwila Oneratons Center Said easement snail be on that segment of the left bank rf the Gcaen River ?rotection Easement as described under Xing County Auditor's ?ilr. No. 5769890 lying within the following described parcel: Beginning at the northwest corner of Section 36, ?oxr.hip 23 North, mange 4 mast, W. .4. in Xing County, Washington; Thence 3 01'19'01• 1 1320.01 feet to the northwest corner of Government Lot 4 of said Section 26; Thence S 38'04'53' 3 381.81 feet; Thence 8 01 °53'07' W 341 feet; Thence N 88 °04'53" W a distance of 50 fe,t to the true mint of beginning; Thence S 38 °04'53• t 426 feet more or less to the top of fns left b.nke of the Green 3iver; Thence S 07 °00' 3 106 feet; Thence S 01 °06' 14 104 fear; Thence S 09 °12' W 106 feet; Thence S 26 °49' W 102 feet; Thence S 47 '4 103 feet; Thence S 60'15' W 40 feet; Thence 8 74 °35' W 60 feet; Thence West 106 feet; Thence N 57 °30' W 107 feet; Thence N 26'19' w 104 feet; Thence N °22' W 103 feet; Thence N 21 ° 54' W 105 feet; Thence N 32 °38' 4i 116 fret; Thence N 44 °04' W 35 feet more or less to a point from which the true point or beginning bears $ 70 °20'07' N; Thence N 70 °20'07" S 220 feet more or less to the `_:tie point of beginning. RECEIVED DEC 21 1998 DEVELOPMENT z � re JU . U O W = J f... U w w 2 u . F Z = H O W U • � O ( 12 ` O 1 W W , LL Z ' W O ~, Z December 9, 1998 Carlyle, Inc. c/o John Deininger Architect 4128 West Ames Lake Drive Northeast Redmond, Washington 98053 Attention: Mr. John Deininger Subject: Dear Mr. Deininger: Project Description Site Reconnaissance Visual Site Reconnaissance Proposed Addition 6801 South 180 Street Tukwila, Washington (. Earth Consultants Inc. Geotrchnical I3ngineers. Geologists & Environmental Scientists E -8525 AECE \fED DEC 21 '1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT As requested, we are pleased to present the results of our visual site reconnaissance for the proposed addition at the subject site. The purpose of our reconnaissance was to observe the general site conditions and observe the stability of the adjacent Green River channel bank. The subject site is located in a meander lobe of the Green River at 6801 south 180 Street in Tukwila. The addition will be constructed at the southeast corner of the existing building. The addition will have a footprint of seventy -five (75) by one hundred ten (110) feet, with a finished floor elevation of 26.67 feet. The addition will be set back sixty (60) feet from the top of the north levee of the Green River and ninety (90) feet from the Green River mean high water mark. On November 23, 1998, a representative from our firm visited the subject site to observe the addition area and the condition of the north bank of the Green River. At the time of our visit, the following conditions were observed: • The Green River is confined to its current alignment by levies. The levee extends to a height of about four feet above the valley floor. At the time of our visit, the river level was about twenty feet below the top of the levee. The river channel banks are inclined at a gradient of about 70 to 80 percent. ATTACHMENT H 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (425) 643 -3780 FAX (425) 746 -0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670 - Carlyle, Inc. c/o John Deininger Architect E -8525 December 9, 1998 Page 2 z • The subject site is located on the inside of a meander lobe. Erosion due to the ~ w Green River should be occurring on the outside of the meander (the bank opposite from the subject site), with deposition occurring on the inside of the o 0 0 meander. co o w= • In the vicinity of the site, the rGreen oRiver ibank .. densely 't vegetated with tall u_ w • During our reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of historic or recent u. instability such as slump features, hummocky topography, or scarps. CO a I— w z} • During our reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of potential future instability such as tension cracks or seepage zones on the accessible portion w 0 of the river bank. n o U O — D I - U' • o .z . w c o 0I- z grass and blackberry brambles. Conclusions And Recommendations Based on the results of our reconnaissance, it is our opinion the proposed addition can be constructed as planned. During our reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of past instability or potential future instability. In our opinion, construction of the addition, with the planned sixty (60) foot set back will not effect the stability of the river bank. We trust this information meets your current needs. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Scott D. Dinkelman, RPG Project Manager SDD /RSL /bkm Earth Consultants, Inc. r Ro•ert S. Lev Principal �.,... IU Project Subject Wllh/To Address 26 RECEIVED DEC 21 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SADL.ER /BARNARD ft ASSOC. INC. LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING • PLATTING (253) 941 -1599 • (253) 927 -8884 • FAX (253) 941 -0869 CARLYLE INC. RIVER BANK CROSS SECTION CARLYLE INC. 6801 S. 180TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98188 31?- A 57°1144_7 Tir{�IC. • 302 E AsPHM Lr �F DA rum' NVVD /929 SEE ExN /6/7 Aq•a/i%/4 3' I / 7' 31a 770 /V 5 . P, 3' S E! 7 /a'V 5 -9 No 98 -274 13 Page / of 3 Date DEC. 8, 1998 Mete. one Aar Phone Fax # SWi, NW* 36, T.23N., R.4E. P S'[.o,pe 0 2.2 i 23 6 -SL oPE (4 2 . 4 : /at /3' /0' Z3 ? 233-- 4 I 31218 PACIFIC HWY. S., "J" • FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 If TILLS DOES NOT MEET WITII YOUR UNDERSTANDING, PLEASE CONTACT US IN WRITING, z aa Z . cC w 6 00 co w= -J CO W w 0 LL -71 I 21.- 1- z w 2 p 0 0 � 01-- - - -- w w •Z � H — .o O ~. z / HMENT G : Project Subject W Ilh/To Address SADLER /BARNARD & ASSOC- /NC. LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING • PLATTING (253) 941 -1599 • (253) 927 -8884 • FAX (253) 941 -0869 No. 98-274 Page Z of Date DEC 8 1998 Pray tab of ACV` Phone Fact # SW NWA 36, T.23I1, R4E. CARLYLE INC. RIVER BANK CROSS SECTION CARLYLE INC. 6801 S. 180TH ST.,______ TUKWILA, WA 98188 ---- E,R 318 q sPkAC r TRAlL * OA-TaM /VGVD /929 5E 4 H I t9 /T DR A NJA E P , sLopA .e 2, 3 : 1 SEC T /o/V - sr Id 3 3 13' SECT /oN S -/I 1 3` z �6 Z 1 2 SLoPc a .7:1 Zo' 1o' 2.08 31218 PACIFIC IHWY. S., "J" • FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 IF THIS DOES NOT MEET WITH YOUR UNDERSTANDING, PLEASE CONTACT US IN WRITING. 15 I \ SADLER /BARNARD Et ASSOC. INC. LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING • PLATTING (253) 941 -1599 • (253) 927 -8884 • FAX (253) 941 -0869 CARLYLE INC. 98 -274 Project No ❑ Pace 3 of 3 Subject river bank cross section Date Dec. 8, 1998 pgst.7` e.e.eol d i e With/To Carlyle Inc. Phone Address 6801 S. 180th St. Faxit Tukwila, WA 98188 SWI,•NW *,Sec 36, T.23 N., E.. 262 26°- -X ,DAT NQ 1/49 /929 $E EX /5/7` f9.MA)nv4 E�P SLoPE . 4 : 3' /7' 317 313- Sc e Trios S -/2 E. ta 31 ? 31! Sa.77ON '.S' fi 8' SL P e 2.8 : I /9' 10' 7 20 E /O ' Z p Z f'f 31218 PACIFIC IIWY. S., "J" • FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 IF THIS DOES NOT MEET WITH YOUR UNDERSTANDING, PLEASE CONTACT US IN WRITING. 201 157 z CC 2 J U 00 0 W • J U ) u_ 2 gQ . _ a . W . Z = zi- U • � o 5 - 2 . 0 I- \ 1- t= u ti Z /O ' U o t•-; z October 16, 1998 Dear Mr. Deininger: Your applications, on building at 6801 S. 1 determined as compl Community Develop • • • • • • • e e ED Responses to De Sheet 1 appears Plan or submit s Show fire turnar Show limits of W IR NGVD 1929 D Benchmark Surveyed topo stamped by a li Please submit c A drainage pla A riverbank sta City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION John Deininger, A.I.A 4128 W. Ames Lake rive, N.E. Redmond, WA 9805 RE: Applications or Design Review (L98- 0060), SEPA (E98 -0023) and a Shoreline Development ermit (L98- 0061), Carlyle, Inc. behalf of Carlyle, Inc., for an 8,250 square foot addition to an existing 0th Street has been found to be incomplete. In order for this application to be e, you must submit the following information to the Department of ent, based on the comments detailed below: • Plans must show required turnaround provision for fire apparatus m shall be used for vertical control and reference FEMA approved aphic and riverbank cross sections shall be done to the toe of the river and ensed surveyor pies of all existing easements and cross reference easements on the plans shall be prepared and stamped by a licensed civil engineer ility analysis is required. John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director ign Review Criteria in the application materials are required o be Site Plan, however is not indicated as such. Please revise to show as Site parate plan and on Site Plan iver and Low Impact Environments on Site Plan 6300 Southcenter Bouleva d, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 October 16, 1998 John Deininger, A.I.A. Re: Carlyle, Inc. Page Two Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner Upon receipt, the City will re- review the materials you submit for completeness and will mail you written notification of completeness or incompleteness within 14 days. This application will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.105.070(E). If you have any questions, my telephone number is 431 -3685. Project: , G`2-►.'ty1c. I 44 C. , et,,t,cc.(4,4.4, A.:4° 4'i d... ^ 9 U/Q c Address: Cve 1 —i . I 6 i=1 Date transmitted: a / 2 Response requested by: i 0 i t t. Staff coordinator: Date response received: 4 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ Planning L- rublic Works El Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec A)6 Ut If 2 da t , &Le- Gem e. C19 C197 Oki 77 .-e- , Ge-- F`�lt t, - 5 u , - s 5 h(cal 6. U- 7"Lce_ u. 7 47 T -c.,� �b N J ev" mud 62- - � � , .CI-CP f Hof 5 whm i f c.rks o/ E'tt/7. Qtr c-c{ 4 ,42 y‘e 9 4../ o74 S ) • fridwr .shrfrt, c s•, Plan check date: ) CQM�LJENTS d' w rg: /s 4 ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested File Number Sh km 2 SEP ❑ Plan approved Comments � reoared by: _ z Wiz cc w UO , C W i J I- 0 2 gQ C o z a. w z � � Z F- 2 o. 0 WW H U , lL b LLI 0 (0 '. 0 I- O Z Project Name: Location: File #: Action: Date: Reviewed By: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE REQUIREMENTS OVERLAY PROGRAM RFA PW STANDARDS / IA a ‘f2i v e PRIOR HISTORY AND CORRESPONDENCE FRANCHISE UTILITY COORDINATION COMP PLAN MISC. STUDIES WD 125 PRE -APP CIP MAINTENANCE NEEDS VAL -VUE PROBLEM AREAS fiol - )2,4/e- ietz - '14 1 cetic4.91vi- god - r y e '114 Syr � Svawieit_6Z .- 5 7‘,/ / ; -/ °( 6:3 T.-° / -0 f2e7/ NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. I: PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: G,4.Z l.'` Zse WAYLEMIDOSS C110,—) FOR STAFFUSE ONLY B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS' 6B ©1 ,o q?e) .-r Planner: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: e.. $El -Ot>u 4 File Number: L q q- (_ j( ` 6, C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) Receipt Number: ADDRESS: L 28 LL9. $441ES L. • t)t2.. Y1$ • lest: »corm webs, • q 8c.G.5 4 Project File #: f) C1' -00H () ❑ Application complete (Date: ) SEPA File #: .3 ._- CE - 0 .3 ❑ Application incomplete (Date:. ) / CI a - 7' / _ A I: PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: G,4.Z l.'` Zse WAYLEMIDOSS C110,—) B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS' 6B ©1 ,o q?e) .-r ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 441 13 GO 2 3O 4 — 1 08 7 '° 4 ' 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: e.. $El -Ot>u 4 Quarter: ViW Section: 3(P Township: 2•3 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: � � 1 k-EY) %Yll n 4.12 24 4MT'EC,T i t. A A ADDRESS: L 28 LL9. $441ES L. • t)t2.. Y1$ • lest: »corm webs, • q 8c.G.5 4 t PHONE: 425 8SO 4881 SIGNATU: • 1111116 . _ _ DATE: _ _ \ CITY OF T vKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 'LEGAL DESCRIPTION) SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) Legal: 362304 87 BEG AT NW COR SEC 36TH S 01 -19 -01 W 1320.01 FT TO NW COR OF GL 4TH S 88 -04 -53 E 381.81 FT TH S 01 -55 -07 W 341 FT TH N 88 -04 -53 W 50 FT TO TPOB TH S 88 -04 -53 E 426 FT M/L TO TOP OF LEFT BANK OF GREEN RIVER TH S 07 -00 E 106 FT TH S 01 -06 W 104 FT TH S 09 -12 W 106 FT TH S 26 -49 W 102 FT TH S 47 -21 W 103 FT TH S 60 -15 W 40 FT TH S 7 4 -35 W 60 FT TH W 106 FT TH N 67 -30 W 107 FT TH N 26 -19 W 104 FT TH N 20 -22 W 1 -3 FT TH N 21 -54 W 105 FT TH N 32 -38 W 116 FT TH N 44- 04 W 35 FT M/L TAP FR WH TPOB BEARS S 70 -20 -07 W TH N 70 -20 -07 E 220 FT M/L TO TPOB TGW ESMTS TGW UND INT IN PRIVATE RD ADJ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ATTACHMENT A errY OF TuKW1L 5 SEP22 Ph inrovr (:ENTER D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at 51 Qt S CO (city), 199 Y. . 2A.Et n W acs (Print Name) (Address) (Signature) (state), on 5 3? .6 oa`7 (Phone Numb.er • Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. . CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: . PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: S'1 7Z H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) FZ •T .V_ . / 'p% ' m.vri ova S/ IM )4Y1 V f-A Wlet K d-1 if4flt?.i C.E?WtVY1a ,Irc.IP4- .. , rt vm€%L . TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed d®velopment: (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal.) 2 tr4f, ExP) . BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: AM) ®✓1 cry" S, Z. w142ivit-kooSe Aatsmai arprtt!,eN . Fbe n21?y1 I c [.V t 12s K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) t . . . PROPOSED STARTING DATE: Val cbwtp- E.T1DY7 eVe Pv sm-tc. czmvtst.os ? ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: 90 L*4 ge.ewv) steer (If project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates :) M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: • ni9Y1e • N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 3 " O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): ey TW1Co e0j___ .'S' 2e S P . SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING/LOADING /STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCR. NING: (setback measured from mean high watermark.) • - c� _ x- = - i- :: v1 ,...._ (Aic..L. TW. 9a' Pnctin 61. H. W. Wt . Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark) �tu+V � �S Lvccw 8 24 � R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: no viSR -V FM 011 • A42 "Mist PATE. & II. TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPNIT.DOC 7/3/96 4 , III. OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. ❑ Tukwila Conditional Use Permit ❑ Tukwila Variance Permit 123 Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: SEPA decision date: Tukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval ❑ Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood Ord. #1462) ❑ Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ❑ Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) ❑ Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife) ❑ Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Aquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) PERMIT # ❑ Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) ❑ Other: SSDPMT.DOC 7 /3/96 APPLICATION DATE DATE APPROVED z J U 0 U U J l t•- W 0 g a co d. z � I- 0 z I- U C) F- 111 uJ Z u U OH z ' CITY OF i JKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 APPLICATION FORMS: Ef Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application 1 Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) l�_' Permit Application Fee ($550) Eg / SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) 7 j SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) IUD Design Review Permit Application (if building permit required) (6 copies) $900 9 PP ( 9P q )( P )( ($900) ❑ Utility Permit Application for Flood Control Zone (4 copies) in Utility Permit Application for Storm Drainage Review (4 copies) 2T Shoreline profile cross -' lions at minimum 75 -foot intervals alc site's shoreline, showing: 0 Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) 0 Proposed structures /improvements 0 For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels 0 Limits of the River Environment, 60 -foot Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment 0 Existing and proposed ground elevations 0 Plan view location of shoreline profile cross - sections 1 Lh Site plan at same scale as survey, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp o: of the architect. The following information must be contained on the site plan: 6 v O Property lines and names of adjacent roads o o 0 Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and LU base flood elevation (100 -year flood) N F- O Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment w o O Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffer widths (TMC 18.45.040) 2 0 Proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond the subject property's boundaries, a with a•notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% a . = O Construction limit lines, and areas of clearing /grading/filling ~ w zI.- - Notations identifying source, composition, volume (cu. ft.) and extent (acres) of any fill F- p material w - Notations identifying composition, volume (cu. ft.) extent (acres) and proposed disposal site of 2 o any extracted material o D- A A - 0 Erosion control measures and tree /buffer protection measures (e.g. barricades, fencing). 0 F- 0 Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with required setbacks v 0 Lowest finished floor elevation LI= o 0 Location of driveways, fire lanes, parking, loading and service areas, with parking calculations L.1 z and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening 0 Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas o 0 Location of site furniture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art O Location and type of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications, including any trail easements 0 Dike /riverbank maintenance easement (min. width: 30' riverward from catch -point of levee) 0 Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of utilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications 'n' 0 Conceptual storm drainage plans with storage, detention and water - quality improvements (see Utility Application requirements for Storm Drainage Review) 0 Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences ni Landscape /planting plan at same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be contained on the plan: 0 Existing trees to be saved by size and species 0 Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing 0 Location of service areas, vaults and mechanical units with proposed screening. IV. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) w ©9 I4 l S ©F r:-)to cor to t w ri:;t 4 � 71 L 1"IGC � ,rg PP-UV-16) Y IM, 4a'rtJYL�.- L-4 ►'J X14 f � � Ut.(,� l ,r1/i b FL) c t.t G I Yl F-12- A- STl?UC \€.' I v1 ?t L..,'', .� A. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) 'PR -cam' WILL, 1+ 44 vr.s. 1► 0.7 t�-c� r �►� P�<_.- d v►_ s �oYZ c,i rl — cif 'Z.XISTt - , 4) ., te'lc. ' '":: -) is 44L -6. LA VI 2--(-7C-12-) "PI Po c) ) p 4.. • V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commercial /development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. 3. Preference should be given to commercial /industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. SSDPN1T.DOC /3/96 : 6 Planner:. Receipt.Number `.: CITY OF TUKWILA Department mss' Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 pplicantnotified:of incomp on: Applicant'riotified of=complete application:: N otice:of:applicaborr. issued : :: FOR STAFFUSEONL AeceIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 2 1998 PERMIT CENTER File Number: C Cross - reference files: eO 5 0 A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: GMaL`c w,4-t2. -0- , PQ rrt C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (address and accessors parcel number(s)) &gigot SD i:g:c7 Ste. iskery-re 4 / 1 3cic, 2..30 4 -- 08 -- o 4- Quarter: Yl 14) Section: 3C' Township: 2- Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) ,CDIO 8 , 2 & W .P.rr 44l-o tr- s.rt V 011 o - F 14.6 s4 cyroV - t vies ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKT.TST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact z statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality 1 of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency cc 6 identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) 6 and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. --1 equired. 0 w= Instruction for Applicants: 0 "- w This environmental checklist ,asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your , proposal are significant, u. a requiring preparation of an EIS. Answef the questions- briefly; with the' mast pFeciSe infbrriiation known, I w or give the best description you can. z = 1-- o You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, w w you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need 2 o to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, o write "do not know" or "does not apply ": • Complete answers -to• the questions Yiow:may avoid unnecessary 0 delays later. = 0 .r I- �. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. iii z. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,..the City staff can assist you. v F. checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of z or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information:reasonably relq.ted•to determining if there may,be.significant impact.. • Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies- and.programs., , ! . ., , : . . . -. I . • Compete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply ". In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). • For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to tliu words "project", "applicant ", and "property or site" should read as "proposal ", "proposer ", and "affected geographic area ", respectively. I A li Fir � 4 tc Iv Ift ' --' .. "f T' �. ;:0-.4 kK etr:.4� Q \ - t ,. � 7 . � } . } . � . r,r ' .. �� ' NY Q4if•..:C�.':1:.. N <: , N ,.'%5 -` �J zND s :s SITE U011, - ' _4 . 01' .c.._ t ',3, _ ti ' J ..' .!' 7 '-,, , Y.1.14Voti.74xxr ^tF,'2.'r,.':1.23NDST„wi ,�4• 1• • CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS LABEL REQUIRE'VIE \TS The City of Tukwila requires that neighboring residents, businesses and property owners be notified of cert#,.types of ending .ap lications in • order to encourage citizen participation in the land use process. kpplicants are therefore required to submit the following materials: • Mailing labels listing the owners of record for all property within 500 feet of the boundaries (not the • ' cetitei)bf fti ;6.1ipligant's si � ' 2 sets 9r 3. sets if SE review is; required).. .� e.. �,_� •1 1 T �� a �•. , • Mailing labels listing the residents or businesses of any property within 500 feet of the property if they are different from the land owners (2 sets or 3 sets if SEPA review is required). • One copy of an assessor's map(s) showing the boundaries of the subject property and the 500 foot radius. • . 1• 6300 .xjjuthcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (2.06) 431 -3670 I • 1' rw • r • J � 1v 1 . ' • Property owner names and addresses can be obtained from the King County Department of Assessment located on the 7th floor of the King County Administration Building, Room 700, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. To compile the inforrnon gequired: • Obtain the assessor's map(s) which contain(s) your property and all neighboring properties within 500 feet (See example diagram). You may use the maps on file in the Assessor's Office or purchase a set from the King County Department of Public Works Map Counter on the 9th floor of the Administration Building. Purchased maps must be ordered several hours in advance of the time you would like to pick them up. • After securing the assessor's maps, obtain a "Real Estate Inquiry Batch Request Sheet" from the Department of Assessment. On this form provide the tax account number for each affected property as shown on the assessor's map(s) and submit the completed form to the Department of Assessment with the appropriate fee. Applicants can request that the information be printed in mailing label form or on standard paper. To obtain occupants /resident/business names and addresses, consult the Kroll maps located in the Tukwila Department of Community Development and then visit the site to determine resident names and unit numbers. The information on the mailing labels may refer to "Resident" or "Tenant ", with the proper mailing address, if the specific name is unknown. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: c., �`j 1riG . 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: IDYTIOY10 4. Date checklist prepared: I 5. Agency requesting Checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : C l'' . • 'ter. i Dy11 lA 'ROr 4F AC}4eU P YL ww c;vSTto --uc t 1").-1 `j" T i41'- A • 4 10 r 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. no • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. y jyiE 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, nel explain. City of Tukwila Contrul No. Epic File No. Fee $ 325 Receipt No. 'S�MIVtiC�� �,1QE}y� L`rL Iu4' $ t fa(Ti� z � Ce 0 z CO O w= 1 U) u. wO LL ¢. = d F z �. F- O z w ❑ • F 2 V. .. u. 0 _ z . O — P z 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. - 0 1 ° — • yt%t_�-T 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, includi g proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. S 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposAl would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(0.' Provide ,a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. &eon 1 Ct c'=' 4 ID ..A-' Vk►Lt.st► L ` A / 1AA 41C r-iL 1/1 — t'. i-t 3 ']17JS.' i 4 °�' w.ww trr 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? An ..... ••• • • _ 1 •• • • • ;:. • `..41% r• • •tf. • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other FLAT b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? --• c. What general types of soils are found on the site --I „•( .example, clay ' sand, gravel • peat, mucli.)? If • you 'kn • the •c'lassifricatio'n Oral specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? , If so, describe. . ..Described the, ,p rpose, typ , and, ap�,roximate quanti - ties of..any fi :1'iri� or -'grad•i.ng proposed. Ind4cate— source of I , �:. �:, w;• • -- :a [- ii g . / it . silo tthe etc ' F-rms f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? �XtsTttn� P1-10a. . 1Gn0 th inl A PQ ilayi £r ? it-c 1012-tucS lc 3 eiS 1 - . 44 ° E • iv+Mper 10 O ?d 70 4 ;1%) cvtayr, clod IttuAsciir2 307 4srrE -4- Evaluation for Agency Use Only : 2. Air 3. Water h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: HJr? P LFS - TV arxx_ s tti+ -tit sort F120 N44 rvi.544t ' tt?iA c.t'rS Q F vietvi4c1 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate : uant,i ies if known. yip 114Gre S6 ►�yv�wycl s�c-yt.�xxto� ew�c��av,E• 4, - r. - �.�, e. Ks tivose, l`a 4Eximmr . b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ] j . Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Y►,�. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (.ipcluding year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. i )ACAP4A +r 'Tb 4g 1 Rt t _- Evaluation for Agency Use Only z 3:w 0:: J 00 Lu J uj 2 S2 = uJ F- _ z � � Z w Lu o uj w. Z cico u. o .z z 2) Will the project require any work over, in. 1r adjacent to .(within • 200 feet) the described waters? - available plans. rT..;1'11."': CA-AA 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate . the source of fill material. _ lelcryle C ‘".!": 4 :r "s.7.• . - )Evaluation for Agency Use Only W•z !.":); •• "'• "* - • • : 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quAn- tities, if known. AM\ 5) ,.:Doet the proposal lie wtWin a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. At' 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste . to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge -6- • r' • • • . • • ' • •• . • • • • • , , -I 0 C) t W a W W , -J ul 5 FW U. < co z I- 1- w w g2 , c3 w ' 0 I- LL 17- - 0 Ci 1— b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to grcund water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. r')0 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged . into the ground fro r , Rtac tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for '"� ��8 sIic • 49 industrial, cont ing' the ' fol'1'owin•g chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the numbe of houses to be served (if applicable), or th number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. yy DV1 E -7- . Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? 'If so, describe. WEUJ 1 1CtV U/t(L Evvt' - - i • • "lull . A4 I ..} . .lam . a . •- —__ ; i .. .. • . a im • .. mac . i .•_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only , • , •1 • I , , ! z � z re LAI -J C.) U O • U W 2 J (" U-- W o g co = w z � 1 -- O z l- LU U • 0 O U O I- W uj U .Z O 1- z b. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. n . Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:_ c — a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other rubs grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants.: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of•ve - What kind and amount of Nidg at'1bn: w.i'1:1. 'be •removed• , ' or altered? ' 'W (L 4. eF gyzja , wiles xE ,L =..S �4t N AT' c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. InDi� -8- Evaluation for Agency Use Only .: z Z 'I w J U 00 U) w L11 I w 0 '. 2 J c �— _ Z � I— 0 Z w 2 '0 - 0 I — I 0 I "00, w 0 z' d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or oth measures to preserve or enhance vegetation er site, if any 9 on the . / ' ( ' rte. a • VI ••• _ • 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: other: f ish: bass, ,uaJn rn,+ herr trig, : stie,l a f i:s.h • List an y threatened ----_ ' ned or endangered species known to be on or near the site. part of a migration route? If so, -9- �.• r ... , ,. •.;!• ";.;._: � • Proposed measures to if any: preserve or enhance•- 40,h1ife, Evaluation for Agency Use Only z I-w 0 O' 1 C 0 IA _ L1 w o g ¢. w d . I-- ▪ w . z z � 1_ o Z Lij w O (i) 0 O 1— w ' I LL i .z, O — O ~ 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solor) vlird.. 1i2� • �rsed '= to�''meet the' `'' completed prmjct?s..energy%needs ?. `OesCHEii= wheth'pr_'" • it will be used for heating, manufacturirt , e•tc. ' ''' V -L `(1t .4 YLa 4. j} 4Tel•GS (AMA— 8E t2 S> h rX ►�u ti v1lt 144 _ t�c•�k'['i r tG ( Q V n2 wt chi' T " '. QQ J V . b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar o ' . energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Y►Q J u_ w0 gQ = w . z �. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control, energy impacts, if any: • . Environmental Health N�t? -3-- rt b+ • • A. a. Are there any environmental health 'hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk: of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardouswaste,%that could occur as a result of this proposal? If 'so, describe. 11wt ,krtn Ct 1 1) Describe special emergency services that might. be required. 7112e/ FeNACIS 2) Proposed mea res to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Itigimg `?Evaluation for Agency Use Only • I- o Z uj • 0 10 • Y • h of 0 ; . z '. 0 z • I 8. Land and Shoreline Use b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 1 -14f ' avt � ,u t y • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. .t'rn46. 2.vcro v t t.12YLI U a , Z4499.t. ,t,5t 14Q.4 91?A? --" gp - 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Vert a. What is the cu rent se of r t_h site' a ~ d 'adjacent properties? Fctcj�ia4LOV°.� . Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Acr- • -. , • . • ' + •,r te c. Describe anx structures on the sib. Z IWO _3110 Evaluation for Agency Use Only ,. ., • »1t1 es�11 . d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yl o e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been caass'If:i'ed•'•4s an •`•: ".: - "environmentally sensitive " - area? If so, specify. 4Y1.1< u 'vL j If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? `Evaluation for Agency Use Only z � re ILI u6= o0 t co C w =. J H : wo Q I 1- w Z =. . ...'. 1- o '. Z W • w U � o - 0 w W Approximately how many completed 1: 10 A pp y y people would d the com l eted 1- � project displace? o CU z. in • I i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? cia =tthe1 c f4E AltAIC401t160 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement' •. 'im ractg,t if' ny: �`•: :; ° : �.... -.. , . .. c Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 'l vices 9SF__S -12- tos �� z 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? y id �•, .vt b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics income housing. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior build'ng material(s) proposed? What views, in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Ate c. Proposed .measures to, reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: W414 -- 4 Cot.oyLS WAT1i ctsrtL. -13- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of: day would it mainly occur? z I I-, . Could light or glare from the finished project be a W 2 ; safety hazard or interfere with views? D; Vle, 0 0 .W ° W U1 LL. W u. <, ▪ W mo z �-: . Proposed . measures to reduce or control light and . g v 'W w . H 0: W co` 0 ,z c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 1/1,tsAft2.._ 12. Recreation'' glare impacts, if any: KDYt4A ,. 4 -14- • 41.; ' a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Al2i346emr mart-eau. -1-12.444 t..- 4 P '9 t G 4144zie 4144z Avtc{H L L 141 t t� • Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. rip c,. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: ►'IOYL$ Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro - posed for, national, state,: or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks . 'r{ evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N4mm, 14.'Transportation c. Proposed .mel.sure. '.t ► c .or cpfi'trpl impacts, if any: . czN■N a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing . street system. Show on site plans, if any. ° J VIZ4 Vt (`Ce,i b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the a r ximate distance to•.,the nearest transit stop? How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the ,project eliminate? 25Q Zdan 1/ka ct t y►.� t N t��'i� -15- Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Y1�, Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. V11100 Evaluation for Agency Use Only f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If know , indicate when peak volumes would occur. W?2,�� -16- Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: V e-v tt 15.. Public Services a. Would the' project result in an increased need, for 'public- .services (for' example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.. ylp • Proposed measures ,' to reduce or control : - •d • -irect • impacts on public services, if any.' ►1a�$ z w o!� :0O :U) (41w W O. z • C'1 -I Z �. . zo U 0 10 SS, I • f = ; ~ ,O H i z • 16. Utilities a. ircleutiliti- urrently available t the s electricit ��refuse service e ep one, sanitary sewer; is system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate .vicinity which might be needed. JU. L vrt t.a t ms #��c t 4`r i u L v►2R�,� �f2.t f71Cf,, C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to . make its 'ecision. Signature: Date Submitt t 1.'71 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT' PAGE. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would thd"liro offal' beilc to iHcre discfiarge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? TT 4• tep. ul Mc.t ,,US-1 • ul rnl t . - rrLe, kAA Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such •incr•Eases are:• Vlfvt, . How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? e Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish,' or ` marine life are: Vi_OvtE_ -18- ' Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Yal Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are:. tIn• *,tjc..., -r.I•ri,41 • • ... .. ,d, \ 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive Areal or areas designated (or eligible or under study) 'for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, 'wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 06 I 41 . ne. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, , inclduing whether it would allow or . encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only z _ i; ••s _10 00 o W W MAL W J LL a W Z � z 0. w nD U 0 U Do E-: w r . W H . w U O Z Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline,•and land use impacts area: lit P- • v How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? L.I�S rat rt10F e=4:,11 ,�A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? n .'}• -• Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: .• • Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the .protection of the environment. ' co-1j -20- 'Evaluation for Agency Use Only z. Z W : 6 � .J U UO . co • LLI W I H ( /)LL W O g J LL j = a . l -W z o z 1- . Q U O - 0 I-- I - U, W — U • • z .. 0— I- O z 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? At? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: ,_spy• • '••, si='' •e � . �•, • ..,�� ••�:... •tip r ' . ; . ■ . r _ . ; 7 , • : a • 7 * 7 • ; .. ' L r • �.,, � . Lai . • v � ��• A i`l' �i'�• �•M. 'i'r:: Y 'i i t Evaluation for Agency Use Only .t i• !. •• • •,• • rir. �w ev J0 O 0 o w z J 1— N LL wO • ~ ▪ w z O . z � LLJ U • � O ff 0 H w W: I � L I , z '' LU U O~ TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANTTh , Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? -,• At*P L Vt O v L— 1a5 1, L4. 4 Ama • 04 A a !AA .. ►' 2, III ±. . • 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? N.1AE. 3. Please.compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action:_- t - trl �.l �r� • s 1.t -rho St . -22- z Ce . U O co C) c W -J = CO W W a LL a = d I _ W Z F ._ : I- 0 ` zh w n p � U off LU 1— =U I- r . U. 0 6.1 z 0 - '.. _ , Off' z 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila - Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? no Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Mrolt_ -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only