The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L98-0102 - EVERGREEN ENTERTAINMENT - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTL98 -0102 LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD CASINO SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT 14040 Interurban Ave. So. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Avenue SE • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000 August 17, 2001 Steven G. Jones Foster, Pepper & Shefelman 1111 3rd Ave., Suite 3400 Seattle WA 98101 Dear Mr. Jones: RECEIVED AUG 2 2 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L98 -0102 EVERGREEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2001 -NW -40033 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to convert two existing buildings into one mini - casino (restaurant, lounge and banquet facilities) comprising 15,300 square feet, demolish and remove a portion of the manufactruing facility from the 40 foot river environment, plant an evergreen buffer riverward side of all buildings /fence with native, low maintenance trees and shrubs in the 40 foot river environment at 14040 Interurban Avenue South within the shoreline jurisdiction of the Green River in the City of Tukwila, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on August 3, 2001. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day appeal period, August 24, 2001. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit, is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, Marcia Geidel Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program MG:mg SDP.DOC cc: Deborah Ritter, City of Tukwila Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION. 'Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Short ,Subdivision Agenda.' FAX ':ToSeattle Times: Classifieds: Mail: Gail ` Muller Classifieds PO: Box :`70 Seattle WA 98111 Determination of Non - Significance Mitigated Determination of Non -. Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Notice -of Action Official Notice Notice of Application Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit as mai 7edto. each 'of the addresses listed on this 3077' day of n. the, ear 20 Project Name: 5 ? o'ZE <iNE 62R'1) ENT tl__ 6,,1517sa Project Number: L QI 2 Mailer's: Signature :. Person requesting mailing: ' PE.5 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM ;�� . �?` .. . , c-' z �W JU U 0 C0 OW _1_ w• 0 2 J u j co =w zF- 1- 0 Z~ 0 0- 0 F- LU ill 1-- 0 It. 0 Z w 0 z Shoo: ° 1 i ne Management Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L98 -0102 Status.: ISSUED Applied: 12/29/1998 Approved: 01 • 3o -o l Expiration: 01- -03 Pursuant to RC.W 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to: EVERGREEN ENTERTAINMENT to undertake the following development: CONVERSION OF TWO EXISTING BUILDING'S (AUTO PARTS STORE AND MANUFACTURING FACILITY) INTO ONE MINI - CA'SINO (CONTAINING RESTAURANT. LOUNGE AND BANQUET FACILITIES) COMPRISING 15.300 'SQUARE FEET. A PORTION OF THE EX;I'STING MANUFACTURING BLDG WILL BE DEMOLISHED TO REMOVE IT FROM THE 40 -FOOT RIVER ENVIRONMENT. PERMIT.APPROVAL CONDITIONED ON': THE REVMO .OF; THE., LAND ;CAPE PLAN TOADD. AN EVERGREEN BUFFER ON ;;THE R•I-VERWARD :;.IDE' OF ALL RL -DG'3 /FENCE' WI.TH2A;: VARIETY. iF. NATIVE, LOW ; MAINT. TR.EEO :& J'HRUE'S!' (A� TO PE`CIES `,TYPE: AND 'SIZE) SHALL ;BE. PLANTED IN' THE 410 —FOOT RIVER ENVIRONMENT z • ~W. re us 6 5 JU u • co - = H u. w O. J upon the following property: Hw. Address: 14040 INTERURBAN AV 5 z�.. Parcel No: 000280 -0004 Sec. /Twn /Rnge : z uj Uca O -; ww 1-H LL ..z w U= O~ THE PROPOSED PROJECT 'WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLAND'S, WHICH IS A 'SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: ( TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Development pursuant to this permit _.hall be undertaken pursuant to the attached terms and conditions. This permit is granted pursuant to the 'Shoreline. Management Act of 1971 an nothing in this permit, shal l excuse the .applicant from compliance with any other Federal, 'State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) . This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permi ttee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL. NOT BEGIN; OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173- 14 -O90. OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDING'S INITIATED WITHIN TENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED: EXCEPT S PROVIDED IN RCW 90. 58. 1411(=) (a) (o) (c) Date: D — ©I. Steve Lancaster Director, Planning Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two year= from date of issuance, per" WAC 1 ?3 -! 4 -OE0. " ". • z TO: FROM: DATE: RE: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Jack Pace, Planning Manager Deborah Ritter, Associate Planner July 27, 2001 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Grand Central Casino 14040 Interurban Avenue South Project File No. L98 -0102 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION The applicant originally submitted an incomplete Shoreline application in December, 1998. In early 1999 the City enacted an eighteen -month moratorium on mini - casinos which was not lifted until June, 2000. The Shoreline application was finally deemed complete in January, 2001. Several revisions of the plans have been submitted since that time. The visual impacts of the proposal will be evaluated by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review during a public hearing tentatively scheduled for August 23, 2001. This review will include building and site design, landscaping and lighting. Based on the applicant's latest plan revisions, the proposal is to convert two existing buildings (an automotive parts store and a manufacturing facility) into a mini - casino (containing a restaurant, lounge and banquet facilities). A new addition to the two existing buildings will result in the creation of one building with a footprint of approximately 15,300 square feet. A portion of the existing manufacturing building will be demolished to remove it from the 40 -foot River Environment. The property's riparian edge will be landscaped. In accordance with the provisions of Tukwila's Shoreline Overlay (TMC 18.44.140(B)(3)) a six -foot fence will screen parking, loading and storage facilities from the river. 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA The site is within the jurisdiction of the City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan ( "SMP "). The policies of the SMP are categorized into the following elements: A. The Economic Development Element requires that development be economically advantageous to the community, maximize use of the shoreline and consider the visual impact of the development on the surrounding area. B. The Public Access Element requires that the development provide for public access to the shoreline and develop or enhance the trail system. C. The Circulation Element requires that roads and transportation facilities be designed in a way that provides for pedestrian access and recreational activities. D. The Recreational Element requires that recreational opportunities along the river should be preserved and enhanced. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 z i 1- . w re 6 2 J U U O'. • , N W`. N LL w O; g J. u_ j. _ a, �w 1- o. Z LU Dp' 'w w' = U:. rui z. 01-. Jack Pace Grand Central Casino (L98 -0102) July 27, 2001 Page 2 E. The Shoreline Use Element requires that uses along the shoreline should be appropriate, protect and enhance the river, be water dependent or compatible with water dependent uses and allow for multiple uses. F. The Conservation Element requires that the river be buffered from the effects of development, where feasible facilities for intensive recreational activities should be provided and scenic views should be protected. G. The Historical /Cultural Element requires areas having historical, cultural, educational or scientific value be protected, restored and made accessible to the public. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the SMP, especially the protection, enhancement and buffering of natural shoreline resources. The segment of the Green River Trail bordering the western edge of the subject property will be enhanced. The development will not adversely affect existing public access, circulation, recreation or land use along the shoreline. The visual impact of the development on the surrounding area will be evaluated by the Board of Architectural Review during a public hearing to be held August, 2001. There are no known historical or cultural areas of value on the site. 3. TUKWILA SHORELINE REGULATIONS The following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the City of Tukwila Shoreline Overlay Zone (TMC 18.44): The Shoreline Overlay is a district which extends 200 feet landward from the mean high water mark of the Green River, throughout Tukwila. This district is divided into three management environments with specific regulations. River Environment - the first 40 feet landward of the mean high water mark. This is the most restrictive environment and only allows for limited public access, transportation and utility uses and structures. Low Impact Environment - the next 60 feet landward of the River Environment. This environment allows structures up to 35 feet, landscaped and screened parking lots, transportation and utility uses and structures. High Impact Environment - the next 100 feet landward of the Low Impact Environment. This environment allows uses permitted in the underlying zoning district. A portion of the existing manufacturing building will be demolished to remove it from the 40 -foot River Environment. Landscaping has been proposed for the River Environment (running along the eastern 40 feet of the property). The work to be performed in the River and High Impact Environments includes the conversion of two existing buildings (an automotive parts store and a manufacturing facility) into a mini - casino (containing a restaurant, lounge and banquet facilities). A new addition to the two existing buildings will result in the creation of one building with a footprint of approximately 15,300 square feet. The proposed use meets the Shoreline Overlay regulations. z • �w re JU 00. uiw -J nLL w0 J. IL. _: z CJ; z� z o:. o 0 H. w W- H 0 0 U co, O ~: z. Jack Pace Grand Central Casino (L98 -0102) July 27, 2001 Page 3 TMC 18.44.110 - General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the Shoreline Zone must conform to the following general regulations: (1) The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: Grand Central Casino will be located in the Commercial /Light Industrial ( "C /LI ") zone and under Tukwila Ordinance 1917 is an allowable use at that location. (2) The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. (3) Response: No conflicts were identified. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river under this permit. (4) There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as a part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit. Response: The applicant has proposed that the invasive vegetation currently existing in the 40 -foot River Environment (running along the entire eastern property line) be replaced with a variety of trees and groundcover. No trees currently exist in this portion of the site. As a result, the existing low -value habitat will be significantly enhanced. (5) No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. (6) (7) Response: The Green River has a water quality designation of Class A. The project will not discharge effluent into the river. All State and Federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and Federal water quality regulations. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: In the 40 -foot River Environment, the applicant has proposed a scattered planting of Scarlet Maple, Flowering Ash and Sweet Gum with Kinnikinnick as a groundcover. We believe that an opportunity exists to create a riparian edge of high habitat value which will be protected from public access and buffered from public view. To accomplish this, an evergreen visual buffer should be created on the riverward side of the buildings. Additionally, a diversity of native, low maintenance trees and shrubs (both z �z aa: 2 JU U O' O. W. w =; wO. -. LL D.. =Cl: = w F- O' Z D p. OtA. U.1 O .. Z. Ujo LO. 0 1.":" f- z Jack Pace Grand Central Casino (L98 -0102) July 27, 2001 Page 4 as to species type and planting size) appropriate to a riparian habitat should be planted in the 40 -foot area between the buildings and the river. z (8) All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be H w ce ; provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for D erosion prevention. -I v U O; w1 I , ;J I w O`. g i F- = z z o: (9) Response: Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation during construction of the project. A temporary erosion and sediment control plan must be approved by the City of Tukwila prior to construction. Landscaping will consist of a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcover along 40 -foot River Environment. All necessary permits shall be obtained from Federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: Responsibility of the applicant. (15) Notwithstanding any provisions of this Code to the contrary, removal of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. w w' U 0:. O D .o =u Response: No cottonwood trees will be removed in connection with this permit. u_ �' uO; 18.44.130 Specific Shoreline Regulations - High Impact Environment V (S' All uses in the underlying zoning district shall be allowed in the high impact environment. Z 1— Response: The proposed project will be located within the River Environment, Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment. The proposed use at the site is allowed in the High Impact Environment. 4. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE POLICIES The policies of the Comprehensive Plan that affect shoreline development are found in the Shoreline Element. Shoreline Element Development should minimize impact on important habitat features, protect and restore degraded riverbanks and mitigate unavoidable disturbance of vegetation and habitat. Development should minimize water pollution, provide erosion control and protect water quality. Capital improvement projects and private development should not endanger public health, safety, welfare or the capacity of the river to provide Tong -term community benefits. Jack Pace Grand Central Casino (L98 -0102) July 27, 2001 Page 5 Over -water structures or reinforcement of the riverbank allowed only when it provides Tong -term public benefit or is essential to a water - dependent use. • Development should reflect the river's role in Tukwila history, protect the Tong -term public use of the river and reflect community traditions. Development should include high - quality site planning, architecture, landscaping, provide for open space and provide a trail for public access along the river (for areas included in the Green River Trail Plan). ▪ Development should maintain views of the water, encourage water enjoyment uses, provide for multiple uses and encourage efficient use of the land. The project will protect and improve the habitat value of the riverbank. Water quality will be protected during project construction through the use of Best Management Practices to prevent erosion and sedimentation. The project will not endanger public health, safety, welfare or the capacity of the river to provide long -term community benefits. No over -water structures are proposed under the permit. The site plan, architecture and landscaping of the proposed development will be evaluated by the Board of Architectural Review during a public hearing tentatively scheduled for August 23, 2001. As part of the City- approved Green River Trail program, the trail leaves the river at a point north of the Foster Links Golf Course and runs parallel to interurban Avenue in a southerly direction. The trail rejoins the river at a point south of the Riverside Casino. The proposed development is located immediately north of the Riverside Casino. Due to the nature of previous development and the river's distance from the existing trail, no public access or views of the water exist or will be created on the site of the proposed development. 5. SEPA A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on July 10, 2001 and posted on July 12, 2001. The comment period expired on July 27, 2001 without receipt of any comments. 6. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit with the following conditions: a. A variety of exterior evergreen landscaping (minimum 6 feet in height) is to be placed along the eastern perimeter of the casino building to create a visual buffer. This landscaping should then continue northward along the proposed fence and existing shop building. b. Additional vegetation is to be planted from the location of the site buildings riverward to restore the riparian edge, incorporating a diversity of native, low maintenance trees and shrubs (both as to species type and planting size) that are appropriate to a riparian habitat. Examples of trees include, but are not limited to, the following: Tsuga heterophylla (Western Hemlock), Thuja plicatam (Western Red Cedar), Alnus oregona (Red Alder) and Acer circinatum (Vine Maple). Examples of shrubs and groundcover include, but are not limited z 6D. —J U O: w I• J g a' D. � w Ill a s zoo .OF-. w W. LL O Z • iii N' • OH • z Jack Pace Grand Central Casino (L98 -0102) July 27, 2001 Page 6 to, the following: Rubus (Salmonberry), Holodiscus discolor (Oceanspray), Ribes sanguineum (Red Flowering Currant), Vaccinium ovatum (Evergreen Huckleberry), Mahonia aquifolium (Oregon Grape), Cornus stolonifera (Red Osier Dogwood), Gaultheria shallon (Salal) and Arctostaphylos uva -ursi (Kinnikinnick). + .....«. 07/06/01 11:09 FAX 206 447 9700 F P & S FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW July 6, 2001 VXA PA__C$x1E Mr. Jack Pace Planning Manager City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Contact for File Nos. E98 -0035 (SEPA); L98 -0102 (Shorelines review); L98 -0101 (Design Review) Dear Mr. Pace: This is to confirm our telephone conversation to the effect that all future contacts and correspondence between the City and the applicant on each of the files identified above should be directed to our office and to my attention. I look forward to working with you and others at the City as we 5nalize the review for this project. Please call me if you have any questions. cc: Steven B. Dowen Rick Lentz Sincerely, FOSTER; 'PER & SHEFELMAN PLLC Steven G. Jones -r7v Akk-ip ivo(9Q /11z 1°'4"5101 P 4ZS - 00 I3 002/002 Direct Flrene (206) 417.2902 Direct Facsimile (206) 719.1962 L•.Mail JoneS(E1folter.com itli THIRD AVENUE .4witc 3400 SICATTLL Washington pitoL -3 =9Y Telephone (2.o6)447-440o Facsimile (_06)447 -9700 Website www.10. TEIC. C.OM A NCH 0 IAGM1 Alaska PORTLAND Oregon SEATTLE Warhinetun $socANc Washington JI{Aosgueda w 1700 -0102 .Page 1 From: Jill Mosqueda To: Alexa Berlow Date: 7/3/01 11:18AM Subject: L98 -0102 1. Since my e- mailed comments to you on 06.19.01, the city received a permit application for grand Central Casino D01 -108 and I want to remove the comment requesting the updated TIR. We received an updated TIR and Traffic impact analysis with this permit application. 2. I want to add the following comment to the comments I sent you on 06.19.01: Please contact Ryan Larson, Senior Surface Water Engineer, at 206 - 433 -0179, regarding dike elevations along the Duwamish River. I routed the plans for this application to PW Operations. One comment I received from John Howatt was that the dike at this area is low and allows some localized flooding. Hence, the above added comment. Please provide the applicant the additional comment that is included on the 06.19.01 comments. regarding contacting Brian Shelton. .. �. ' • 'Z -7 Z ; oQ_ w • ;;• • UP U.O.! • .w=; O LL! w0'. u_ < L • • H w; • , • F-0; • • ,w w' • • Z' • • • `,V N O ;z:.. CITY OF TUKWILA Id: rout130 Activity document routing mai Permit No: °;L9820102,'. Status: PENDING Keyword: UACT ntenance. Applicant : ATACS Address: 14040 Route: 1 Current Route Packet Units Description User: 1685 07/02/01 SHORELINE- MANAGEMENT ;:° PRODUCTS INC INTERURBAN AV S Line: 1 of 7 Station Status Received Assigned Complete a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa aaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa as Packet Units Action Station Initials Status Received Assigned Completed LU -2 00 00 C ADMIN STRT Ap Cond. 12/29/98 01/06/99 01/21/99 Priority. (0 /low..9 /high): 0 Regular hours (HH.MM): .00 Overtime Hours(HH.MM): Comments 1[1/4/99 ROUTED DOCUMENTS TO BUILDING, PW, FIRE, POLICE, PARKS] 2[1/21/99 PW COMMENTS THAT FULL STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN WILL BE ] 3( REQUIRED PER KCSWDM, TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED, MAULE] 4( AVENUE VACATION MUST BE FINALIZED.NG ] 51 ] 6[ ] 7[ 81 9[ ] 10[ aaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa F1 =Help, ESC =Exit current screen. ) .'.:: «. �,`. CITY OF TUKWILA Id: rout130 Keyword: UACT Activity document routing maintenance. User: 1685 07/02/01 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Permit No: L98 -0102 Applicant : ATACS PRODUCTS INC Status: PENDING Address: 14040 INTERURBAN AV S Route: 1 Current Route Packet Units Description Station Status Received Assigned Complete a aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Packet Units Action Station Initials Status Received Assigned Completed LU -2 01 00 C PLANNR NG DENIED 01/21/99 01/21/99 01/21/99 Priority (0 /low..9 /high): 0 Regular hours (HH.MM): .00 Overtime Hours(HH.MM): Comments 1[1/21/99 PLANNING INCOMPLETENESS COMMENTS: NEED TO SHOW MHWM,1 2( SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTS NOT CORRECTLY SHOWN, 35' HEIGHT ] Line: 2 of 7 3[ LIMIT NOT COMPLIED WITH, NOTICE RADIUS INCORRECT. 4[1/22/99 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION SENT. NG 5[2/8/99 NOTIFIED APPLICANT OF CASINO MORATORIUM. NG 6(6/14/00 - MORATORIUM ON GAMBLING LIFTED. 7(11/00 - APPLICATION EXPIRED. AB NG ] ] ] 8(1/9/01 - REQUEST TO CONTINUE REVIEW RECEIVED FROM APPLICANT ] 9(1/11/01 - REQUEST GRANTED. REVISIONS TO INCOMPLETENESS RECEI] 10(VED. APPLICATION COMPLETE 2/8/01. ] aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa F1.Help, .ESC =Exit current screen. W re UO co W'; W=; W O. LL�, - d ;I— W.. Z Z� H- O'.. Z F—' LU uj 0 W W. U 'w ; 1 O CITY OF TUKWILA Id: rout130 Keyword: UACT User: 1685 07/02/01 Activity document routing maintenance. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Applicant : ATACS PRODUCTS INC Address: 14040 INTERURBAN AV S Permit No: L98 -0102 Status: PENDING Route: 1 Current Route Line: 3 of 7 Packet Units Description Station Status Received Assigned Complete aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa Packet Units Action Station Initials Status Received Assigned Completed LU -2 01 01 C PLANNR AB Approved 01/21/99 02/14/01 02/14/01 Priority (0 /low..9 /high): 0 Regular hours (HH.MM): .00 Overtime Hours(HH.MM): Comments 1[APPLICATION COMPLETE 2/8/01 1 2[ ] 3[ROUTED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW 2/14/01 1 4[04.04.01 PW has not received plans for review. LJM .06.19.0 PW received items submitted in 1998 and in 2000. ...1 "` 6[App. shall provide a new Technical Information Report per th]' 7[e current KCSWDM. Applicant shall contact Brian Shelton to ]i 8 [resolve location of S. 140th St. LJM 9( 1 10( 1 asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa F1 =Help, ESC =Exit current screen. Otis --- 1 fly fa • Memo To: Jill Mosqueda From: Cyndy Knighton Date: 06/28/01 Re: The Grand Central Casino Traffic Impact Study I've taken a look at the TIA submitted for the Silver Dollar Casino on Interurban Avenue. There are a few concerns regarding the trip generation that I would like the traffic engineer, Christopher Brown & Associates, to address. Data used in developing the trip generation rate was based on a single site study of another Silver Dollar Casino that is half the size of the proposed facility. However, the TIA stated that the two facilities are comparable in size. 1 disagree. Because the building size for the SeaTac casino was used to develop a trip generation rate, the full gross square footage of the proposed facility should also be used when figuring the peak hour trips. In other words, the banquet room and office space should not be considered 'ancillary' using the proposed methodology for trip generation. There is another Silver Dollar Casino located in Tacoma, which may be more comparable in size. If not, another casino may be similar enough to study to provide more accurate data supporting the local trip generation rate. Studying only the 4-6 pm hour time frame is adequate for my needs. The reason I'm requesting further data be gathered is the much higher rates found in the Trip Generation Manual for both CasinoNideo Lottery Establishments and High- Turnover Sit Down Restaurants, both which are somewhat reflective of the type of proposed facility. would also like to see the actual rate being used and how it was determined. This needs to be included in the report in a clear manner. There is a lot of supporting data but no clear justification for the inbound and outbound rates. Are the rates based on square footage? Are they based on patrons per hour and an estimated vehicle occupancy rate? Those questions need to be answered. Credit can be given for the existing peak hour trips generated by the current use of the building but no trip credit can be used for 'existing' trips from the Riverside Inn. If you have any further questions, please let me know. I - I, S U , CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name: File #: References: Atacs Product, Inc. Las Vegas Casino Big Apple Casino Tukwila Restaurant and Card Room Grand Central Casino L98 -0102 Shoreline Permit E98 -0035 SEPA 3.40.41 Maule Avenue Street Vacation L01 -027 BLA L98 -0100 CUP L98 -0101 Design Review 06.19.01 L. Jill Mosqueda, P.E. The City Of Tukwila Public Works Department has the following comments regarding your application for the above permit. Please contact Jill Mosqueda (206) 433 -0179, if you have any questions regarding the following comment.q._ Shoreline Provide an updated storm drainage report in the TIR format spelled out in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The storm drainage design shall meet the 1998 standards. An excerpt from Chapter 1 is enclosed. Additional Comment Contact Brian Shelton at 206- 433 -0179 to resolve the location of S. 140th Street. Projects /Atacs /L98 -0102 shoreline comm 1 1 iz Si 00 CO 0 cnw• All =i. CO w w of cD s a; Z F- 0. 2 DI zF q; cu oi H-i Ili '1- U; .1= ;z CHAPTER 1 DRAINAGE REVIEW AND REQUIREMENTS KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL Section 1.1 Section 1.1.1 Section 1.1.2 Section 1.1.3 Section 1.1.4 Section 1.2 Section 1.2.1 Section 1.2.2 Section 1.2.3 Section 1.2.4 Section 1.2.5 Section 1.2.6 Section 1.2.7 Section 1.2.8 Section 1.3 Section 1.3.1 Section 1.3.2 Section 1.3.3 Section 1.3.4 Section 1.3.5 Section 1.4 Section 1.4.1 Section 1.4.2 Section 1.4.3 Section 1.4.4 Section 1.4.5 Drainage Review Projects Requiring Drainage Review Drainage Review Types and Requirements Drainage Review Required By Other Agencies Drainage Design Beyond Minimum Compliance 1 -3 1 -6 1 -7 1 -15 1 -15 Core Requirements 1 -17 Core Reqmt #1: Discharge at the 1 -17 Natural Location Core Reqmt #2: Offsite Analysis 1 -19 Core Reqmt #3: Flow Control 1 -25 Core Reqmt #4: Conveyance 1 -38 System Core Reqmt #5: Erosion and 1 -43 Sediment Control Core Reqmt #6: Maintenance and 1 -46 Operations Core Reqmt #7: Financial 1 -47 Guarantees and Liability Core Reqmt #8: Water Quality 1 -49 Special Requirements 1 -59 Special Reqmt #1: Other Adopted 1 -59 Area - Specific Requirements Special Reqmt #2: Floodplain/ 1 -60 Floodway Delineation Special Reqmt #3: Flood 1 -61 Protection Facilities Special Reqmt #4: Source Control 1 -61 Special Reqmt #5: Oil Control 1 -62 Adjustment Process Adjustment Authority Criteria for Granting Adjustments Adjustment Application Process Adjustment Review Process Appeal Procedure 1 -65 1 -66 1 -66 1 -67 1 -67 1 -68 9/1/98 Z re 2 J U 00. NW: M: J F-, C/)LL w O: ga Hm Z �.. Z I- ON CI H. w w` U; O ~' z 1111■U l.'Ju \1 1, rrrtJn11NU1L , JuhrHI.L wH1CK 1JtJ1lJry 1V1M1\UHL, CHAPTER 1 DRAINAGE REVIEW AND REQUIREMENTS This chapter describes the drainage review procedures and types, the drainage requirements, and the adjustment procedures necessary to implement surface water runoff policies codified in Chapter 9.04 of the King County Code (KCC). It also provides direction for implementing more detailed procedures and design criteria found in subsequent chapters of this manual. Chapter Organization The information presented in Chapter 1 is organized into four main sections as follows: • Section 1.1, "Drainage Review" (p. 1 -3) • Section 1.2, "Core Requirements" (p. 1 -17) • Section 1.3, "Special Requirements" (p. 1 -59) • Section 1.4, "Adjustment Process" (p. 1 -65). Each of these sections begins on an odd page so that tabs can be inserted by the user if desired for quicker reference. Key Words and Phrases Several key words and phrases have specific definitions as they are used in this manual; those of particular importance in determining drainage requirements are listed below. These and other terms are defined in the "Definitions" section in the back of this manual. Many of these terms are also defined when first used in this chapter. • Acceptable discharge point • Closed depression • Construct or modify Direct discharge • Drainage area • Equivalent area • Existing site conditions • Flow durations • Flowpath • High -use site • Hydraulically connected • Natural discharge area • New impervious surface • Pollution- generating impervious surface • Pollution- generating pervious surface • Project site • Redevelopment project • Replaced impervious surface • Single family residential project • Site (see also onsite and offsite) • Surface flow • Threshold discharge area 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1 -1 9/1/98 • W JU UO' co • W • ,W=; W O AL. Q: • • 1=— W l■; F- a. Z • W W; U U. • ;O • 41 1— • W; W U O F,, z KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SU?FACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL 1.1 DRAINAGE REVIEW Drainage review is the evaluation by the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) permit review staff of a proposed project's compliance with the drainage requirements of this manual. During drainage review, DDES permit review staff also evaluate the proposed project for compliance with other King County requirements (which are not covered in this manual), such as those specified in the Sensitive Areas Ordinance, basin plans, and Critical Drainage Areas. If required, drainage review becomes an integral part of the overall permit review process. This section describes when and what type of drainage review is required for a proposed project and how to determine which drainage requirements apply. Guide to Using :Section 1.1 :Ttie;following;steps a rerecoiiiriiended for efficient. use of Section A etermine -whetheryour proposed.projectis subject io :the requirements, :ofttiis manual,by seeing if it :Meets any:of.the thresholds.for drainage review specified.m Section .�1 :1 :1: :(p.::1 =6). Making this=' determination requires an ,understanding of the-Key.Definitions ]istedbelow. :°If drainaee review . is required:per Section 1.1.1. use the .flow chart.in Figure ;1.1 :2.A (p. 1 -7) to ::determine what type of drainage review will be conducted by DDES. The type of drainage review defines the scope of drainage requirements that will apply to your project as summarized. in Table • . :3. :.. :.Check :the :more:detailed . threshold: information in" Section':1 :1.2 (beginning on page .1 -7) to verify that ou"have :determined.the,correct type of drainage review.,. er:veri in, :drainage review type,:use theinformation in.Section;1 :1 2-to :determine which core uirements (found in Section .1:?) ,and which special requirements: (found in Section 1:3) .must .be uated for.compliance by your,prolect : :To determinewhat :actions are necessary to: comply. with and special requirement, see the more detailed information on these requirements contained in.Sections]:2 and13 of this chapter. : Note :. For Steps' 2. through 4, :iris recommended that you arrange a predesign meeting :with DDES permit review :staff to confirm the type of drainage: review. and scope of drainage regiurementsthat apply to your. .proposed project. ❑ KEY DEFINITIONS Proper application of the drainage review thresholds in this section requires an understanding of the key definitions listed below. Other definitions can be found in the "Definitions" section of this manual. Construct or modify: To install a new drainage pipe/ditch or make improvements to an existing drainage pipe/ditch (for purposes other than routine maintenance, repair, or emergency modifications, and excluding driveway culverts installed as part of single family residential building permits) that either serves to concentrate previously unconcentrated surface and storm water runoff or serves to increase, decrease, and/or redirect the conveyance of surface and storm water runoff. Critical Drainage Area: An area where the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has determined that additional drainage controls (beyond those in this manual) are needed to address a severe flooding, drainage, and/or erosion condition which poses an imminent likelihood of harm to the welfare and safety of the surrounding community. Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) are formally adopted by administrative rule under the procedures specified in KCC 2.98. When CDAs are adopted, they are inserted in Reference Section 3 of this manual and their requirements are implemented through Special Requirement #1 (see Section 1.3.1). 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1 -3 ° 9/1/98 SECTION 1.1 DRAINAGE REVIES - High -use site: A commercial or industrial site that (1) has an expected average daily traffic (ADT) count equal to or greater than 100 vehicles per 1,000 square feet of gross building area; (2) is subject to petroleum storage or transfer in excess of 1,500 gallons per year, not including delivered heating oil; or (3) is subject to use, storage, or maintenance of a fleet of 25 or more diesel vehicles that are over 10 tons net weight (trucks, buses, trains, heavy equipment, etc.). Also included is any road intersection with a measured ADT count of 25,000 vehicles or more on the main roadway and 15,000 vehicles or more on any intersecting roadway, excluding projects proposing primarily pedestrian or bicycle use improvements. Natural discharge area: An onsite area tributary to a single natural discharge location. Natural discharge location: The location where runoff leaves the project site under existing site conditions. New impervious surface: The addition of a hard or compacted surface such as roofs, pavement, gravel, or dirt, or the addition of a more compacted surface such as the paving of pre- existing dirt or gravel. Landslide Hazard Drainage Areas: Specially mapped areas where the County has determined that overland flows from new projects will pose a significant threat to health and safety because of their close proximity to SAO - defined landslide hazard areas that are on slopes greater than 15% (a delineation of the known SAO landslide hazard areas can be found in King County's Sensitive Areas Map Folio). Such areas are delineated on the-Landslide Hazard Drainage Areas Map adopted with this manual (see map pocket on inside of back cover). Pollution - generating impervious surface (PGIS): Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to vehicular use or storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes, or chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run -on or blow -in of rainfall (for more details, see page 1 -50). Metal roofs are also considered to be PGIS unless they are treated to prevent leaching. Project site: That portion of a property or properties subject to proposed project improvements including those required by this manual. Redevelopment project: A project that proposes to add, replace, and/or alter impervious surface (for purposes other than routine maintenance, resurfacing, regrading, or repair) on a site that is already substantially developed (i.e., has 35% or more of existing impervious surface coverage). The following examples illustrate the application of this definition. Example of an Existing Site Condition for a Redevelopment Project Existing Impervious r Area (35 %) Parking Existing Pervious Area (65 %) Site Boundary Example of a Proposed Redevelopment Project that Alters Existing Impervious Surface r Impervious Area (35 %) Parking Pervious Area (65 %) Project Site Boundary Example of a Proposed Redevelopment Project that Adds to Existing Impervious Surface Pervious Area (15 %) JImpervious Area (85 %) 1 BId9. Parking Project Site Boundary Replaced impervious surface: Any existing impervious surface on the project site that is proposed to be removed down to bare soil or base course and replaced with pollution - generating impervious surface, excluding impervious surface removed for the sole purpose of installing utilities. Single family residential project: A project that constructs or modifies a single family dwelling unit and/or makes related onsite improvements, such as driveways, roads, outbuildings, play courts, etc., or a project that creates single family residential lots such as a plat or short plat. 9/1/98 1-4 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1.1 DP A.INAGE REVIEW —KEY DEFINITIONS Site: The legal boundaries of the parcel or parcels of land for which an applicant has or should have applied for authority from King County to carry out a development activity, including any drainage improvements required by this manual. Threshold discharge area: An onsite area draining to a single natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within one - quarter -mile downstream (as determined by the shortest flowpath). The examples below illustrate this definition. The purpose of this definition is to clarify how the thresholds of this manual are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points. Example of a Project Site with a Single Natural Discharge and a Single Threshold Discharge Area :Natural �erszn�rc, Area, THRESHOLD :DISCHARGE::: `•:'AREk..,...: (Shaded) Natural Discharge Location Example of a Project Site with Multiple Natural Discharges and a Single Threshold Discharge Area _oral Natural .Discharge _Dischjarge - -- Area ;1 Area.2 ,- THRE HOLD . . , :f�1SC �- i ,(S ed) Natural —if Discharge Locations • '/ Mile Downstream I (shortest flow path) v, Example of a Project Site with Multiple Natural Discharges and Multiple Threshold Discharge Areas nlai14rel "' . ` Natural Discharge, :... Discharge-- Area-I Area 2 THRES4OLD THRESHOLD -'DISCHARGE DISCHA _AREA 1'. • ,i EA 2 (Shade) ti t - -, i - Natural /1I Discharge Locations / 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1 -5 . 9/1/98 Z• ZH • mow'. 6 DI 00 Np; w WL .W =' J I.... N u_' W O' g f� Q. d' • H =; • ZI. .0 ca.. D 1--' • • W ` H u-10 W Z V 11 0 Z.. . SECTION 1.1 DRAINAGE REVIE 1.1.1 PROJECTS REQUIRING DRAINAGE REVIEW T H R E s H 0 c D Drainage review is required for any proposed project (except those proposing only routine maintenance, repair, or emergency modifications) that is subject to a King County development proposal, permit, or approval listed at right, AND which meets any one of the following conditions: 1. Adds 5,000 square feet' or more of new impervious surface, OR 2 Proposes to construct or modify a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size/depth, or receives surface and storm water runoff from a drainage pipe/ditch that is 12 inches or more in size /depth, OR 3 J Contains or is adjacent to a floodplain, stream, lake, wetland, closed depression, or other sensitive area as defined by the Sensitive Areas Ordinance (codified in KCC 21A.24), excluding seismic, coat mining, and volcanic hazard areas, OR 4. Is located within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Areal and adds 2,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, OR 0 5. Is located within a Critical Drainage Area,3 OR 6. Is located within a rural zoned area subject to areal clearing limit? under KCC 16.82.150(c) and clears more than 7,000 square feet or 35% of the site, whichever is greater, OR �� Is a redevelopment project proposing $100,0005 or more of improvements to an existing high -use site, OR )Is a redevelopment project proposing $500,000 or more of site improvements and creates 5,000 square feet or more of contiguous' pollution- generating impervious surface through any combination of new and/or replaced impervious surface. King:County Permits and_Approvals Administrative Subdivision (Short Plat) Conditional Use* Clearing Commercial Building Experimental Design Adjustment* Formal Subdivision (plat) Franchise Utility Right -of -Way Use Grading Preapplication Adjustment* Right -of -Way Use Shoreline Substantial Development* Single Family Residential Building Special Use* Unclassified Use* Urban Planned Development Zoning Reclassification* Zoning Variance* *Note: If the proposed project will require subsequent permits subject to drainage review, then DDES may allow the drainage review to be deferred until application for the later permits. If drainage review is required for the proposed project, the type of drainage review must be determined based on project and site characteristics as described in Section 1.1.2. The type of drainage review defines the scope of drainage requirements which must be evaluated for project compliance with this manual. 1 The threshold of 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface shall be applied by threshold discharge area and shall include all impervious surface that will ultimately result from the proposed project (e.g., impervious surface that will result from future homes within a plat or short plat). 2 Landslide Hazard Drainage Areas are delineated on a map adopted with this manual (see map pocket inside of back cover). 3 See Reference Section 3 for a list of Critical Drainage Areas. 4 See Reference Section 1 for a list of rural zoned areas where this threshold applies. This is the 'project valuation' as declared on the permit application submitted to DDES. The cost thresholds in this manual are considered to be in 1998 dollars and may be adjusted on an annual basis using the local consumer price index (CPI). 6 Contiguous pollution- generating impervious surface (PGIS) means a discrete patch of PGIS that is all together as opposed to being separated in different locations on the project site. The intent is to identify those redevelopment projects that are replacing and/or adding enough impervious surface in one location to allow for opportune installation of a water quality treatment facility. The threshold of 5,000 square feet or more of contiguous PGIS shall be applied by threshold discharge area. 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1 -6 Z �Z' cc W 6 —J C.) UO: CO CI • I— 0 LL W O.. g co = ▪ W Z ZOO • j; UD 0 I— WW Z U Z H 0 H Z 1.1.2 DRAINAOr—'1EVIEW TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS 1.1.2 DRAINAGE REVIEW TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS For most projects adding 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface, the full range of core and special requirements contained in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 must be evaluated for compliance through the drainage review process. However, for some types of projects the scope of requirements applied is narrowed to allow more efficient, customized review. Each of the following four drainage review types tailors the review process and application of drainage requirements to a project's size, location, type of development, and anticipated impacts to the local and regional surface water system: • Small Site Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.1 (p. 1 -9) • Targeted Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.2 (p. 1 -10) • Full Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.3 (p. 1 -13) • Large Site Drainage Review, Section 1.1.2.4 (p. 1 -13). Each project requires only one of the above drainage review types, with the single exception that a project which qualifies for Small Site Drainage Review may also require Targeted Drainage Review. Figure 1.1.2.A can be used to_determine.which.drainage review type would be required. This may entail consulting the more detailed thresholds for each review type specified in the above - referenced sections. Table 1.1.2.A (next page) can be used to quickly identify which requirements are applied under each type of drainage review. The applicant must evaluate those requirements that are checked off for a particular drainage review type to determine what is necessary to meet compliance. FIGURE 1.1.2.A FLOW CHART FOR DETERMINING TYPE OF DRAINAGE REVIEW REQUIRED Is the project a single family residential project (as defined on page 1-4) that adds 2,000 to 10,000 sf of new impervious surface AND clears < 2 acres OR < 35% of the site, whichever is greater? Yes 4.No Does the project add 2 2,000 sf of new impervious surface within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area (LHDA) or 2 5,000 sf outside of a LHDA, OR is it a redevelopment project costing 2 $500,000 that creates 2. 5,000 sf of contiguous PGIS from new and/or replaced impervious surface? No LL,SITEDRAINAGEREVIEW: Section 11 2 y' .? Note The <project may alsobe subject toT.argeted,- Drainage =Review.as, determined! below' -'!- 4 Yes Does the project have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories (see the more detailed threshold language on p. 1 -10)? 1. Projects that contain or are adjacent to floodplains or sensitive areas, OR projects within a LHDA or Critical Drainage Area, OR rural zoned projects subject to areal clearing limits per KCC 16.82.150(c) 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify a drainage pipe /ditch that is 12" or larger or receives runoff from a 12" or larger drainage pipe /ditch 3. Redevelopment projects proposing >_ $100,000 in improvements to an existing high -use site 4. No Reassess whether drainage review is required per Section 1.1.1 (p. 1 -6). Does the project involve an Urban Planned Development (UPD) or meet any of the other thresholds for Large Site Drainage Review specified in Section 1.1.2.4 (p. 1 -13)? Yes Yes _ ...�Z ��5:. -s l:::,� .W;�! -i:-; Lam'• c: ;.ARGESITE:URAINAGEREVIEW <� ..1r'.:.1 n:7:5;,......:".710,` '" », 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1 -7 *9/1/98 SECTION 1.1 DRAINAGE REVIEW TAELETL 2.A=.:.' REQLTIRE3VIENTS'APPLIED:ITNDEit EACH1DRAINAGE11EVIEW.,TYP.E :' Small Site Drainage Review Targeted Drainage Review Full Drainage Review Large Site Drainage Review Single family residential projects that add 2,000 to 10,000 sf of new impervious surface AND clear < 2 acres or < 35% of the site, whichever- is greater. Small Site projects or other small projects that are not subject to Full or Large Site Drainage Review as deter- mined in Sections 1.1.2.3 (p. 1 -13) and 1.1.2.4 (p. 1 -13), AND which have the characteristics of one or more of the following categories of projects: 1. Projects containing or adjacent to floodplains /sensitive areas; or projects within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area (LHDA) or Critical Drainage Area; or rural zoned projects subject to areal clearing limits per KCC 16.82.150(c) 2. Projects proposing to construct or modify-a-drainage pipe /ditch that is - -:. - 12" or larger or receives runoff from a 12" or larger drainage pipe /ditch 3. Redevelopment projects proposing >_ $100,000 in improvements to a high -use site.(1) All projects, including redeye!. opment projects, that add 2. 5,000 sf (2,000 sf within a LHDA) of new impervious sur- face but do not qualify for Small Site Drainage Review, OR redevelopment projects costing > $500,000 that .create z 5,000 sf of contiguous PGIS from new and/or replaced impervious surface. UPDs, OR projects that result in ? 50 acres of new impervious surface within a subbasin or multiple subbasins that are hydraulically connected, OR projects on sites >_ 50 acres within the recharge area of a sole- source aquifer. Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 SMALL SiTE REQUIREMENTS ,I CORE REQUIREMENT #1 Discharge at Natural Location *(2) ✓ V V CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Offsite Analysis *(2) V(3) 17 (3) V(3) CORE REQUIREMENT #3 Flow Control . *(2) V(3) V(3) CORE REQUIREMENT #4 Conveyance System *(2) / ✓ V CORE REQUIREMENT #5 Erosion & Sediment Control / 1( 'V 17 V CORE REQUIREMENT #6 Maintenance & Operations *(2) '7 V ' 1( CORE REQUIREMENT #7 Financial Guarantees & Liability *(2) V(3) 17(3) V(3) V(3) CORE REQUIREMENT #S Water Quality *(2) V(3) V(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #1 Other Adopted Requirements 17 (3) ✓(3) 17 (3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #2 Floodpin/Floodwy Delineation _/(3) 1� V(3) V(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #3 Flood Protection Facilities ./. (3) V(3) V(3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #4 Source Control 1,7. (3) V(3) V(3) V(3) 17 (3) SPECIAL REQUIREMENT #5 011 Control 17 (3) ✓(3) V(3) (1) Category 3 projects that install oil controls which construct or modify a 12 -inch pipe /ditch are also Category 2 projects. (2) May be applied by ODES based on project or site-specific conditions. (3) These requirements have exemptions or thresholds which may preclude or limit their application to a specific project. 9/1/98* 1 -8 1998 Surface Water Design Manual May 8, 2001 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Merrick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 136th Place NE Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Grand Central Casino (formerly Las Vegas Boulevard ) File Number L98 -0101 (Design Review) Associated File Numbers: L98 -0102 (Shoreline Substantial Development) E98 -035 (SEPA Checklist) Dear Rick: This letter is in regard to your recent visit to the DCD Permit Counter, your recent telephone message requesting information for a timeline on your permit application submittals, and more recently, your fax regarding your design review application. I received your fax concerning your design review permit revision submittal for completeness review. At this time, this permit has expired as of March 22, 2001. Please submit a request to grant an extension to continue review of this permit application. The SEPA checklist (file numberE98 -0035) and shoreline permit (file number L98 -0102) have completed internal reviewed by city departments. Comments to your application submittals will follow. The boundary line adjustment (file number L01 -027) is currently under review. I expect to have comments back on this application by the first week of May. I will notify you in writing regarding the extent of these comments. Sincerely, a kW lexa Berlow Associate Planner Cc: City Reviewing Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 z Z .0 0 U o: W = 1-; CO IL I uw O: gJ u- a. w, 0. 1. OC Dp uj'. L O Au co; H Z 03,20/2001 23:20 FAX 206'1444542 RIVERSIDE CASINr--`'' 0 0 STATE of WASHINGTON SECRETARY' of STATE 1, RALPH MUNRO, Secretary of State of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal, hereby issue this C,'ER TIFIC,A TE OF AMENDMENT •to SBD, INC. a Washington Profit corporation. Articles of Amendment were filed for record in this office on the date indicated below. Changing name to EVERGRLEN ENTERTAINMENT CORPORZATTON UB1 Number: 601 270 11.6 Date: March 21, 2000 Given under my hand and the. Seal of the State of Washington at Olympia, the State Capital Ralph Munro, 5mretary of . e -? -d' 31 -9 MGR -2:i -300 t G. : 2 PM TETEL )2.162 -4 ,tc t2 _ . �--•�- _• -L TDB )t,_MA PST. S D . ...:>. +: : z • ~ z'; • mow: = . ug • J U: c.) 0:: .N 0• W = CO ti' w o g a• w F— ! •z D p1: '; Lit 0 cwi = z PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, Washington 98104 -1511 Senior Title Officer, Kelly Cornwall (kellycornwall @pnwt.com) Senior Title Officer, Marie A. Pierce (mariepierce@pnwt.com) Unit No. 6 FAX No. (206)343 -8401 Telephone Number (206)343 -1335 Foster, Pepper & Shfelman, PLLC 1111 3'1 Avenue, #3400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Anne B. Tiura PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A GENTLEMEN: Title Order No. 429855 CERTIFICATE FOR FILING PROPOSED PLAT In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that according to said records the title to the following described land: As on Schedule A, pages 2 and 3, attached. IS VESTED IN: SBD, INC., a Washington corporation SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. 'CHARGE: TAX: $200.00 $ 17.20 TOTAL CHARGE: $217.20 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: March 23, 2001 at 8:00 a.m. t r PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF H*OTON, INC. Kelly C rn all Senior le Officer Unit No. 6 ., ft Order No. 429855 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 2 In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that according to said records the title to the following described land: PARCEL A: Lots 21 and 22, Block 9, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington. PARCEL B: Lots 23, 24 and that portion of Lot 25, lying northwesterly of a line 146 feet and 4 inches long extending from the southwest corner of Lot 25 to intersect the south line of Lot 24, all in Block 9, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington. PARCEL C: That portion of the Puget Sound-Electric Railroad Right of Way (formerly Seattle- Tacoma Interurban Railway) located in Joseph Foster DLC #39, all within the south half of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, bounded on the northeast by Maule Avenue as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington, on the southwest by SR181 (Interurban Avenue South) as conveyed by deed recorded under Recording Number 7212140434, on the southeast by Right -of -Way Number 7 (South 141s` Street) as described in deed recorded under Recording Number 6557639, and on the northwest by Right -of -Way Number 8 (South 140`h Street) as described in said deed recorded under Recording Number 6557639. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Tukwila by deed recorded under Recording Number 20001102000061. PARCEL D: That portion of Maule Avenue vacated under City of Tukwila Ordinance Number 1924, recorded under Recording Number 20001102000068, which attaches by operation of law, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 25, Block 9 of said Hillman's Plat, also being a point on the northeasterly margin of Maule Avenue; Thence along said northeasterly margin south 43 °41'20" east, 10.00 feet; �' Order No. 429855 PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: Thence leaving said northeasterly margin south 46 °18'40" west 20.00 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of Right -of -Way Number 7 per Recording Number 6557639, in King County, Washington, said point also being a point on the southwesterly margin of said Maule Avenue; Thence along said southwesterly margin north 43 °41'20" west, 407.64 feet to the most easterly corner of Right -of -Way Number 8 per Recording Number 6557639, in King County, Washington; Thence leaving said southwesterly margin north 74 °37'25" east 22.72 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 19, -Block 9 of said Hillman's Plat, also being a point on the northeasterly margin of said Maule Avenue; Thence along said northeasterly margin of Maule Avenue south 43 °41'20" east 386.87 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL E: That portion of Puget Sound Electric Railroad Right -of -Way Number 7 per Recording Number 6557639, vacated under City of Tukwila Ordinance Numbers 1702 and 1703, and recorded under Recording Number 9505030375, which attaches by operation of law, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 25, Block 9 of Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington; Thence along northeasterly margin of Maule Avenue per said Hillman's Plat south 43 °41'20" east 10.00 feet; Thence leaving said northeasterly margin south 46 °18'40" west 20.00 feet to a point on the northeast line of said Right -of -Way Number 7, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said northeast line of said Right -of -Way Number 7 north 43 °41'20" west 25.48 feet to the most northerly corner of said Right -of -Way Number 7; Thence along the northwest line of said Right -of -Way Number 7 south 46 °18'40 west 89.97 feet to the northeasterly margin of Interurban Avenue South; Thence along said northeasterly margin of Interurban Avenue South, south 43 °41'19" east 25.48 feet; Thence leaving said northeasterly margin of Interurban Avenue South, north 46 °18'40 east 89.97 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. END SCHEDULE A �+ `. Z ' Q ne Lam 2 6 .J U: C.) 0 ; lAW' W= J CO u., W O' g Q, Nom: = Cy I-W ZF 1-- O' Z UJ Ill; U� ur F U !L I-' O.. uiZ ' U Z MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT March 16, 2001 . Alexa Berlow City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Name Change for Project to Grand Central Casino 14040 Interurban Avenue South Project Numbers E98 -0035, L98 -0101, L98 -0102 Dear Alexa: Due to difficulties in complying with nationwide copyright and trademark laws, the . . ;previous names proposed for this project are not available for our use Therefore, this will be renamed the Grand Central Casino. This name and the modifications to the building exterior have now been resolved and will be in effect for the duration of the project. This will affect the.permits for Shoreline Substantial Development, SEPA and Design Review. From our previous correspondence, we understand that the application for Conditional Use #L98 -0.100 previously applied for will not be necessary for this project, and will be cancelled. Thank you for your continuing assistance with this project. Merrick D. Lentz Principal Architect 1800 -136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747 -3177 • FAX 425/747 -7149 E -Mail mlarch @isomedia.com _..—........ March 1, 2001 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: File # L98 -0102 — Applicant: Merrick Lentz Architect Members of the Planning Commission: With respect to the above referenced application to convert an existing manufacturing building to a restaurant and card room, I would like to make the following request: I would appeal to the commission to require the restaurant and card room developer to strictly adhere to the City of Tukwila requirement for landscaping. Currently, the aesthetic appearance of some of the card rooms on Interurban Avenue leave a lot to be desired. Sincerely, a/war Donald A. Moody Property Owner at 13975 Interurban Avenue South RECEIVED MAR 0 2 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The proposed project shows a Building "C" fronting city park property in the Northeast corner of the site. We request that the landscape buffer be continued all of the way to the river and not stop half way. The type of tree /shrub should fit the desired goal of screening; however, trees such as poplars should not be used because of the surface roots. In addition, the vacation of Maul Avenue cannot be supported until problems related to Maul Avenue in other areas are resolved. CITY OF TUKWILA.. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 T AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATIO:\ AND ppS7'I\ G OF PUBLIC INFORVIATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of msiegkcg Lz iTZ (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on Fes. i41-1 '2OC 1 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 1404-0 ItATSRURBANI ME. 5. so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number LIS -O 101/ EqR -0035 /d / / //( Imo. Afiant (Applicant Signa SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /.5< day o fa iy1 zoo/ NOTARY PUBLIC in and f the State of Washington residing at �'/4 My cornrnission expires on 1 • . Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila • AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: Z-18- d l O,„1 Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mai l i ng:GLLexa_ Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this / Fr day of /1Z6 in the year 20 0/ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM Ciz of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED: February 9, 2001 The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: Merrick Lentz Architect LOCATION: 14040 Interurban Avenue South FILE NUMBERS: L98 -0102 (Shoreline Substantial Development) PROPOSAL: Proposal to convert an existing manufacturing building to a restaurant and card room. The proposal would also include paving of existing parking, auto storage space, landscaping, and improvements to the elevation OTHER REQUIRED LAND USE PERMITS: L98 -0101 (Design Review) E98 -0035 SEPA (State Environmental Policy Review) These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, March 5, 2001. For information on the date and time of the public hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431 -3670. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal contact Alexa Berlow, Planner -in- charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Planning Commission on a project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: December 29, 1998 January 19, 2001 February 12, 2001 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION February 8, 2001 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 — 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Big Apple Casino Shoreline Substantial Development L98 -0101 SEPA E98 -0035 Dear Rick Lentz: This letter is to notify you that your applications for shoreline development and your request for SEPA review, for the proposal to develop a restaurant and cardroom at 14040 Interurban Avenue South, has been found complete as of January 19, 204. Within the next 14 days, you must attach a laminated forms for each application on your notice board. For instructions and timelines to install a notice board on the site, please refer to Attachment B - Public Information Signs in the application packet. After the form has been installed, please drop off a signed Affidavit of Posting to show proof that the notice board and proper notices have been installed. You will be responsible for removing the notice board from the site once your application has been approved and finalized, and when all public comment periods have terminated. I will notify you when this laminated form is ready for you to pick up. This determination of Complete Application does not preclude the City to request revisions to your proposal through the formal project review phase. This is now. underway. Your application will be routed to appropriate departments for internal review, and any revision comments made back to you within 21 days of this notice. This is to insure that your proposal meets the substantive requirements of the zoning code and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 ... Big Apple Casino L98 -0102 (Shoreline Substantial Development); E98 -0035 (SEPA Checklist) Page 2 Please submit a written request to change the name of your project proposal. The decision to change the name is not currently affecting review of your project, though any confusion on the name could cause delays at any time during the review process. Please address your letter: Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator, Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me as planner -in- charge of your project at (206) 431 -3673. Sincerely, /GO (oW c.� Alexa Berlow Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments Associated file L98 -0105 (Design Review) ,W 5' U 01 'CO CY UJ H' LL w Os 'IL Q N = r Y .F-O Z W w` Doi 0N'. .W '. •_ 0: • .z Ham;. :0.. t z FE8 -07 -2001 08:14 FROM:CMA RST.SR,:� 1 1 4257477149 MERRICK LENTZ • ARCHITECT • TO: P064313665 F ;A. X 't r a n s m i t date: February 7, 2001 to: City of Tukwila attn: ' Alcxa Burlow fax #: (206) 431 -3665 re: Las Vegas Boulevard Casino from: Rick Lentz pages: One Good morning Alexa, We anticipate submitting the additional information to allow the Design.Revi application to continue for this project. Could you provide an update on the p gress of the Shoreline/SEPA review that is currently underway? Of special interest to us is the question of position of 140th Street South relative to the project site, and what the possib alternatives may be. Any info you could provide relative to scheduling would be appreciated. a I will +e back in the office Thursday. Maybe we could touch base then, or a voicemail messa e would be fine: Thanks for your help with this project. 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747 -3177 • FAX 425/747.7149 E -Mail mlarch0isomedia,com P.001/001 City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director January 11, 2001 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 z z' 6 O U: U _ t p: cnw. J =: LO wO LL u, z 0 z (— This letter is in response to your letter of January 9, 2001, faxed on this day, requesting to �` continue review of land use permits L98 -0101, L98 -0102, L98 -0100, and E98 -0035, to develop ct N Las Vegas Boulevard Casino, renamed Big Apple Casino. Your request to continue review of ;p F- these land use permits is granted. This extension is valid for 120 calendar days from the date of w W' expiration, November 22, 2000. 0' —O The extension will apply to L98 -0101 (Shoreline Substantial Development); E98 -0035 (SEPA); and L98 -0102 (Design Review). Permit number L98 -0100 (Conditional Use will no longer be H required. Ordinance 1917, approved June 14, 2000 by City Council to allow certain house- O f-. banked social card games with up to 15 tables, will supercede the need to submit this permit z . application. The Department of Community Development will refund you the fee for this permit application. To date, the City of Tukwila has received revisions to the Shoreline Substantial Development and SEPA Review. Completeness review on these applications is underway. We have not received your permit application for Design Review. Please submit this as soon as possible. This will assist us to process your permit applications as expeditiously as possible. Otherwise, you have up to 120 calendar days from November 22, 2000 to submit the remaining application, though extending the time frame of your submittal can delay the approval of the permit applications that are currently under review. A copy of the comments is attached for your convenience. This letter also is to clarify the statement you made in your letter, second paragraph, about building in the river environment, the first forty feet (40 ft) measured from the mean high water mark. Development in the river environment is allowed, but only the uses listed in Chapter 18.44.130 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. A copy of this section of the code is attached for your convenience. Redevelopment of an existing structure may also occur in the river environment, however, the building footprint of the exiting building may not be extended into the river environment. RE: Las Vegas Boulevard Casino L98 -0102 (Design Review), L98 -0101 (Shoreline Substantial Development) L98 -0100 (Conditional Use), E98 -0035 (SEPA) Dear Rick Lentz: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Big Apple Casino L98-0101 (Shoreline Substantial Development); L98-0102 (Design Review) E98-0035 (SEPA Checklist); L98-0100 (Conditional Use) Approval to Continue Permit Page 2 If you have any further questions, you may contact me at 431-3686, or you may contact Alexa Berlow, planner in charge of these permits at 431-3673. . Sincerely, c Pace Planning Manager Attachment -.09-2001 12:42 FROM:CMA RST.SF •.January 9, 2001 •Mr.••Jack P. Pace, Planning Manager • Department of Community Dcvc(opmcn.t City:of Tukwila , • •• • . 6300 Southcentcr Boulevard • • Tukwila, ,i�Vashington 9.8188-2544',' . • RE; . ' Rig Apple Casino,(.Rcnamcd,— was late' Vegas Boulevard Casino) •,' • L93 -0102 Shoreline; Permit • ' L93 -0101 Design Review ' . • L93 -0100 Conditional Use . • ',E9-0635 Slsl'A Checklist•• 1 4257477149 TO :.964313665 P.001/001 - MERRICK . Z,ENTZ ' . ARC 'ECT • ' 1)ew•Mr. Face: •• Applications for the projects listed above mire subtttittect on•Dccctnber 23, 1993 Icy initial • . t•eview% On January 22, 1999 'Notices of rncotnp(cte Aplflication.were seat, On Feb }wary 1, 1999, . ' the city instituted a - moratorium on casinos that prevented us from proceeding with i 1ie project .ut\til that was resolved. Another requirement for the project was•to complete. the vacat3•4 prc:cess . fru Maulc Avenue. These issues wcre' cleared. this an, 'and we were nbie to pro eed with the rosponscs, to the initial notices, • • ' • i1 ••.ut�ing the original pre- applicatt ni meet(ng.it ,was proposed to•pmvide tenant i npniwetnent.; t4 •, the existing building, including the,portion that was locate within the 40' River Environment; It • • Was our understanding froth that meeting that this would be allowed as long as•the bootprint area' . was•not modified, In meeting with :you arid Alexa Burlow earlier this,year, it tips made clear that 1no portion of the building would be allowed to remain within the river•'environinent. It was also ' ro• `— l�q`extcri ttevatio�3te to, a mere compa,1 e w t ,.tile area: As a . result of these recommendations, the application has been modified to' incorporate this •information: • • , • •' ' • • ' ^ _� .' ' • • —H 1 2 ac,(: - . • I was not informed that the city had set a firm expiration date of November 22 forthi$,.praject, • • The work deser(lsed'above regtiired.nzuch•stttdy and ,moditication :ofthe proposal. We were also , • waiting to receive, a decision from the city on ttie resolution of the 140t• Street'improvz.,nents that • '• ;prescntly'lie on the'subject property and interfere with the site development proposed. Response . from the-city on this subject has not yet been offerecl'even though requests for sorne'resolution: were submitted months ago. • ' • ' •' • • 'It is the desire of the client to•devclop thls•project; We ask tliat you allow'thesc.revje*s to be able ' to continue so ,that the project can proceed. If you have any questions I would be happy to • ' respond, We would appreciate hearing of your decision at your earliest' convenience, • Sincerely. •• - • • ' • • ' • • MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT • • • • .Merrick,). Lentz' • • • Principal.Architeet , • • 1800 -16th Pla iiing , Suite 100 . ' ' Bellevue, Washington 98005 • • ;425/7474177 ■ FAX 425/747 -7149. ' . ' • E -Neil talarthitectC isomedia.com• • i ' • z • �w 0 c • w= J 1—• W WO _1. = w' • . • zo ALJ U0 N; :CI I- 'W O. wz 0 :1 MERRICK LENTZ 7" t. RESPONSE TO SHORELINE PERMIT QUESTIONS & DESIGN POLICIES AS APPLIED TO THE PROPOSED LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD CASINO A RESTAURANT AND CARDROOM TO BE LOCATED AT 114040 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH December 23, 1998 z _- JU, 00' CO 0'. W =; J H NU_ w 0: g u. Q. N CY; w z� I— 0: We believe the criteria as specified for the Shoreline Review are satisfied by the following: w w TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES: io co:. ;_w U. 1. This project will primarily serve the local population, as well as provide an attractive use w z that can attract neighboring residents to the area. Increasing traffic into the neighborhood can 0? -, be a benefit to other surrounding uses as well. p H ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 2. The current use of the property is manufacturing, with a commercial use on the south side and city maintenance shops on the north side. This would not seem to be an area that could be developed into recreation or public uses. 3. The location of the existing buildings that will be retained do not contribute to shoreline enhancement. In addition, there are prohibitions against any modifications within 40' of the shoreline, plus mandates to retain all existing vegetation along the river bank area. The structure will be remodeled to provide viewing of the river from inside the building, which will not require physical work to be done along the river. 4.The proposed changes to the property will be a great improvement to the existing manufacturing use. Paving and landscaping, along with the exterior changes to the building, will enhance this area tremendously. 5. As stated in 3. above, there are restrictions against development within 40' of the river bank. Visual access will be provided from within the building, but pedestrian access is not possible in this development. 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747 -3177 • FAX 425/747 -7149 E -Mail mlarchitect @isomedia.com 6. Converting to an assembly use in lieu of a manufacturing use will increase the public's awareness of the river's presence in this location, which is an improvement over the existing conditions. 7. This restaurant/cardroom will be open 20 hours per day, which will allow increased exposure of the river to the public. 8. Since no modifications are allowed or will be proposed for this property, there should be no impairment to the biological features of the river and its shoreline. PUBLIC ACCESS ELEMENT 1. The work on this project will be tenant improvement to an existing building. 2. This project will not be proposing any modifications to the existing area along the water's edge, due to the requirement of the city to restrict any construction activity within 40' of the shoreline. It is proposed to retain the shoreline area in its existing condition without enhancement or modification. 3. The trail is existing and has been relocated to parallel Interurban Avenue as it passes by this site and the Riverside Casino to the south. It is proposed to retain this improvement without modification, as it is connected at both ends to the existing system. CIRCULATION ELEMENT 1. No roadways are proposed adjacent to the shoreline as part of this proposal. 2. Parking is proposed to be located in areas already being utilized for vehicle storage on the site, and is located more than 60' from the shoreline. 3. Public transportation serves the site along Interurban Avenue. No modifications to the system are being considered. 4. No railroad property is included with this project. RECREATIONAL ELEMENT There are no publicly owned recreational uses immediately adjacent to the site, although Foster Golf Course is located across the river from the property. Views of the shoreline will be improved and enhanced by improvements within the existing building that will provide new visual access to the water that are not currently present. z a • rt 0 0, w0 w= w. O 2 w< P. a w; _. 1- O' z1- LLI • 0. • col 'O ;0 r. w w O: N' ; U O H, CONSERVATION ELEMENT This project proposes no modifications to the site other than improvements to the existing building exterior elevations. This will preserve the existing conditions of the water's edge. All development to take place as part of this project will be oriented away from the water to avoid activity that could be potentially detrimental to the river environment. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES ALL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT 1. No modifications are proposed for the riverbank or areas immediately adjacent to the water's edge. 2. By limiting development activity in the 40' from the water's edge there should be no adverse impact on the riverbank. 3. There should be no disturbance of the vegetation or habitat along the river's edge. 4. The parking and storm drainage systems are existing for this site. It is proposed to install an oil -water separator catch basin in place of an existing catch basin to improve water quality. In addition, the area currently used for parking and vehicular circulation is being reduced and will be replaced with landscaping, which will also be an improvement to the water quality on this site. 5. The work on this site will be tenant improvement to the existing building. The new finish floor elevation will be constructed at elevation 22.15', which is 12" above the level of the base flood elevation. Improving the site drainage by repaving the parking areas will also help to control drainage flow. 6. This project should be an improvement to the community, and will pose no adverse impacts on public safety, health or welfare, or inhibit benefits of the river to the community. 7. This project minimizes impacts to habitat, vegetation,access, recreation, historical resources and flood control by restricting improvements to existing buildings and systems. 8. No modifications to the riverbank is proposed, and no over -water structures will be constructed. 9. No unique historic /archaeological features are believed to be present on or around this site. Items 10 - 16 do not apply to this project. 17. The existing trail between the building and the street will be retained. z z w: re 6 o, JU; UO c .N�. • (n W w z: J � w u- Q. S2 a' = w Lu • O N; w W: H V: U (n` O~ z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98183 (206)431 -3670 I ...I:t: c. ,.w.... mw...t M w]�.'T.�Y� ^.}1Xy ` ��w OL TS TB�� N. ,� -- _ r�....,_..t .-r. ;^: !?�w,1^-{,,. r. te,• s- r,'-1P x.. = es N - � : � : yT�" w :^ a wi` .: -. _. ...-_. -� : -aP.0_- .4,.-r.,:s Nr-- .yw ,.:. -ti . .. ,±.. ..•�u . " . Revision submittals must be submirted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: re- . 2'1 ,o0 Plan Check/Permit Number: t. 61 5 - t> 102 5 T :t,L ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter 4 ❑ Response to Correction Letter itrl ❑ Revision m after Permit is Issued Gcl � - 003 tTA Project Name: 1314 A-f bc- CA/NU ( 7'(2'('{1 �z.u- LAS U EA--S &/1/ 6,)Nir,-) Project Address: 14-c74-0 1 r. 'fz u i-2, reQ 0E S . Contact Person: 12.1.0. LtIr2 Phone Number: 4'Z -741- 3%1/ Summary of Revision: PCV02O nv-t INaf11,}(., � 7Q,1J 1 r z 5 } beYci.51-4 )0 4.�,N -'F- f�JG —rve-C =7 141 40 1 7 = 121\- R i 'ee`15t O ''so l uoi Nil C'iLYva- PLirn ga.rf f✓L� t Hof j cop, Pte SLE.N/ , ,014 ( 5r( ') kDoL, MphU1 ..IA.66L5 P2 1oy.o P 2'L4' Z; of 9.4 E,w5t ? J\V)E'0� REV' l5 o Pri -17'5 Ali(- -`C5 P�rns110C0 Sheet Number(s): 1( A/ A-3 L t C1- 3 . SuNE (i1LL 1 'r`( 51v�Va) (T7 5) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center bv: ❑ Entered in Sierra on ?'• ,� �. ; 08/30/00 z Wiz. JU. 0 0: t Np: CO =' CO u_ W 0, 2 gJ. _ 2. r- UL z Z I- 0 Z 2 j UU :0—.. I- ww.. _Z LLi z • ' - • . • MERRICK - LENTZ • ARCHITECT December 15, 2000 Alexa Burlow .City of Tukwula. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 TukWila, Washington.98188 RE:. :Big:Apple Casino--(Renamed — was Las Vegas Boulevard Casino) L98-0102. Shoreline Permit E98-0.035 §EPA.Checklist• . . Dear .Alexa::.. This letter i§ in response to_the Notice of Incomplete Application for this project, dated January 22; 1999. The delay in responding has been caused by the process to vacate Maule Avenue, and the recently removed moratorium on casino projects by the city. • Since both of these issues are now resolved, we would like to continue the review process. Plans have been updated to demolish the portion of existing.building footprints that lie within the 40' River Envircinment. The building elevations have also been modified to simplify the appearance as discussed earlier. This information is updated with this response. . One issuestill to be.resolved is the South 140th Street improvement, constructed outside of its right-of-way and lying on the subject property. This applicatiohshows the street being relocated back to its proper position within the right-of-way. This, or another mutually acceptable solution, must be accomplished to allow parking for at least 135 vehicles.for the proposed project. This.has been an issue since October 1998 and has yet to be addressed by Public Work.. _ The responses to the Notice are as follows: Shoreline Permit Items a. 'The- location of the Ordinary High Water Mark is shown on the plans as directed by. city staff. b. /The correct locations of the River Environment, Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment are indicated on the plans. The building as redesigned is less than 35' high in the Low Impact Environment, as shown on the revised elevations. • 1800 -. 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747-3177 a FAX 425/747-7149 E-Mail mlarchitect@isomedia.cOm c. Shoreline cross - sections are included in the civil engineering drawings. d. The engineered storm drainage system and reports are provided. e. Plans are stamped and signed by the responsible parties. f. The survey has been converted to the NGVD 1929 datum. SEPA Checklist Items a. Additional mailing labels are provided as requested. b. Pages 22 and 23 of the SEPA Checklist are provided. Thank you for your assistance with this project. We_will now be proceeding with the consolidated Design Review and Conditional Use applications, and will be bringing these in to you shortly: • Sincerely, MERRICK. LENTZ ARCHITECT Merrick D. Lentz Principal Architect • TUKWILA RESTAURANT & CARD ROOM Tukwila, Washington Preliminary Technical Information. Report For Shoreline Permit Review Prepared For: Steve Dowen. Prepared By: Pacific Engineering Design, Inc. December 12, 2000 PEDI Job No. 00019 " H. 6 JU:` CO al U o'. W J • w o: . ' -j ua.. Zt 10 =f1 ,o W 1- U O ALI in? Z: Z. , Technical Information Report Tukwila Restaurant & Card Room Tukwila, Washington Shoreline Permit No. L980102 SEPA Checklist No. E98 -0035 December 6, 2000 Prepared For Steve Dowen c/o The Riverside Inn 14060 Interurban Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98168 Prepared By Pacific Engineering Design, Inc. 4800 S. 188th Street, Suite 360 Seattle, Washington 98188 (206) 431 -7970 EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROJECT OVERVIEW II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY III. OFFSITE ANALYSIS IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS VIII. OTHER PERMITS IX. EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc .., .. • �•!.�. _ !' . .. • I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The project site is located in the City of Tukwila, on the southeast corner of the intersection of Interurban Avenue and South 140th Street (see Figure 1). The total property encompasses 2.01 acres. The site and surrounding area have been developed and are situated in a commercial/industrial zone. The rear of the site abuts the Duwamish River at approximately mile marker 10.7. The property is currently occupied by an automotive parts store and products manufacturing business. There is very little existing on-site vegetation except immediately adjacent to the River. The site is quite flat with no visible slope and is generally about 2 feet above the ordinary high water elevation of the river. The site is almost entirely covered by buildings surrounded by paved and gravel parking and storage areas. On-site improvements will include relocating a public road (South 140th Street) approximately 40 feet to the north. Existing utilities will be retained. Stormwater management will include a vault for water quality control. When completed, the site will house a restaurant and card room. The Photos Section, which follows, shows much of the site in its current state. • PAProject Files\00019\0019 drainage report.doc z 1• 1- Z d-"- -1 • C.); WI I—; 'CD 0: g • D me a; sZ Z01- LLI tu. Z` ,I= 0 • II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY There have been numerous meetings between the architect and the City of Tukwila to discuss the proposed project. Copies of two letters to the client that summarize some of the important points from these meetings have been included in this report. P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc • off-site area. P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc IV. RETENTION /DETENTION ANALYSIS & DESIGN Two of the three existing buildings on -site are within the 40 -foot setback line. These buildings will be extensively remodeled, retaining that portion of the footprint outside the 40 -foot setback region. As a result, the aggregate building footprint will be reduced. The finished floor elevations of the on -site buildings will be raised to an elevation 1 -foot above the 100 -year flood stage (see Figure 2). The King County Soils Atlas classifies the site as Urban -type soils (see Figure 3). This indicates that little of the precipitation that currently falls on the site infiltrates. Rather, it collects on -site and sheet flows into the Duwamish River, just to the east. The proposed site grading includes landscaped parking areas and a 40 -foot setback from the ordinary high water mark. These proposed features will actually reduce the total impervious surface on the site. Because the existing gravel is hard- packed, it is considered to be impervious surface for modeling purposes. Thus, post - development runoff will actually be less than current levels. Because of this, no stormwater detention storage is necessary. For a summary of pervious and impervious areas in the existing and developed conditions, see Drainage Calculations section, pages 3/6 & 4/6. A baffled stormwater retention vault is proposed to provide water quality treatment. This vault will be sized per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements (see Figure 4). The outlet from the vault will empty into the river. Because of the necessary depth of the vault, the outlet will be constructed at an elevation that will be submerged at certain times. The outlet will be equipped with a flap gate to prevent river water from entering the system during these times (see Figure 5). P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS & DESIGN Not applicable at this tune. P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc • VI. SPECIAL REPORTS & STUDIES Not applicable at this time. P: \Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc VII. BASIN & COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS Not applicable at this time. P:\Project Files\00019\0019 drainage report.doe y VIII. OTHER PERMITS Not Applicable at this time. P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc ,,, 1 IX. EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN The project will provide typical Erosion Control BMPs, including the installation of a stabilized construction entrance to eliminate the potential of mud tracking into the existing City streets. Furthermore, silt fencing will be installed along the site boundaries as needed to eliminate the potential impact to adjacent properties. Existing catch basins will be lined with filter fabric to ensure that any sediment -laden run - off.is filtered before it discharges into the downstream system. P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc ♦.,, J U! ;U O: rn cY. NW, • W =; • N O; • J Z 1—; oN; Oi Zi •O —; O iZ ti X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND. SKETCH, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Not applicable at this tim P :\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc 1 XI. MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL Not applicable at this time. P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc 4Vo— COO kl 3-D TopoQuads Copyright 1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04096 Source Data: USGS 95 ft Scale: 1 : 12,800 Detail: 14-0 Datum: WGS84 F I - r.t. Gti •r ? * , o� Drawing • 1 640 000 FEET SEATTLE P.O. 9 MI. SHEET NO. 10 KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (DES MOINES QUADRANGLE) 122°15' 47°30' Tdwe&s • • 180 000 FEET • Foster • Golf Course RicO 0 td te ..Tukwin Sch . Ur • 23. 27'30" 111M1 _ Min ••• •• . ••••••••••••• • • AkF n c4k FIOUli.r-= 3 1'1 , • .', ' I 1 6.4.2 WETVAULTS WETVAULT wetpool width Manholes or access doors required. See IGng County Road Standards for specifications for manholes and ladders. ventilation pipe (12" min.) ladder * A removable baffle frame, grate and locking cover marked "drain" (typ.) 5' x 10' grate over second cell (may be provided by a grated 5' x 10' access door or • anel wetpool length PLAN VIEW NTS for vaults >_ 1250 s.f. provide a 5' x 10' access door or removable panel over lowest portion of vault "V" shaped bottom OUTLET - Open pipe for wetvault only. See detention vault for combined water quality/ detention vault outlet detention optional ladder size to meet conveyance requirements (Ch.1) WQ design WS inlet removable baffle 1' first cell sized for 25% to 35% of wetpool volume 3' min. wetpool depth 8' max. 1' for WQ vaults 2' for combined W.Q. and detention vaults NOTE: capacity of outlet pipe designed to peak flow for conveyance ' 2' min. " ? bottom slope 0.5 -2% toward inlet end average sediment storage 1' min. (first cell) • T mi 5% (min.) slope trowel finish SECTION A -A NTS gravity.drain (if grade allows) place as low as grade allows but must be 6" min. above the base elevation of vault walls or above sediment storage area bottom slope 0.5 -2% towards outlet end of second cell(recommended) access doors or removable panel r. r .��. -- a .�\ j WQ design WS 'T 4' min. .' ' . , SECTION B -B NTS average 1' sediment storage (first cell) 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 6 -85 r 9/1/98 Z = Z. Li 6 JU 0 0; Ci W I J �. N V„'. w O ga 3: I-W Z�; �— 0. Z I— n ❑ I—: tn W 1-- U. O. W Z, U J. O ~� Z • GROUND LINE 18X18 MESH BRONZE SCREEN BACKED VV/2X2 BRASS WIRE CLOTH 10' -0" FLAP VALVE COMPANION FLANGE UCTILE IRON OR GALVANIZED STEEL • DRAIN PIPE • ONE CUBIC FOOT OF RIPRAP ROCK SIZE 2" TO 6 "95 FLAP VALVE (TYP) TO BE INSTALLED AT DRAIN OUTLET NO. SCALE • FIGURE 5 CORRESPONDENCE. P:\Project Files \00019\0019 drainage reportdoc - RUG -03 -2000 10:43 FROM:CMA RST..SW 1 4257477149 MERRICK LENTZ • ARC CT TO:206 431 7975 P.001/002 F A. X t r a n s m. i t t a i date: August 3, 2000 to: Riverside Casino ..attn: Steve Dowen . fax #: (206) 2444542 re: ATACS Property Development from: Rick Lentz pages: One phko C Shen{ Pr" 'frying to find some common ground to discuss the project with the'city, based on the . last meeting. Would you be amenable to modifying the footprint per the attached sketch? I would propose to demo the two "wings "; totalling 3020 square feet located in the first 100' from the shoreline. To mitigate this, we could propose to add 1440 square feet and connect the two front buildings. The bulk of this addition falls beyond the 100' setback from the river, which has less impact than the first 100'. This would allow up to 11865 • square feet of building area. It may also be necessary to demo the third storage building to help gain approval from the city. Per my, understanding of the shoreline codes, the city has the primary responsibility to determine the conditions necessary for shoreline development. Their recommendation then goes to the A.O.E. for concurrence. If we can get an indication of support from the city, this would help with the D.O.E. review, Also, D.O.E. is not set up to review projects in advance of an application, so getting an advance review may be difficult. If you concur with this concept, I'll run it past the city as drawn or as modified by you. I would not 'include demo of the shed at first - only if it appeared to make a difference to overall approval. cc: Greg Diener - Pacific Engineering Steve Jones - Foster, Pepper & Shefelman, PLLC • 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747-3177 • PAX 425/747-7149 E-Mail mlarchl1111@isomedia.com z W` • C) .' U O; W =. Lu w:. z0. uf ON ID w; 0:. • U N; os ff: 200/200'd SL62. S£b 902:01 6VZLLWLS2b T . JUL -25 -2000 14:11 FROM:CMA RST.SRD 1 4257477149 MERRICK LENTZ Arlx.v,sr r-ruziu4, 66 II F A X t r a n s m. i t t a 1 T0:206 431 7975 P.001/002 date: July.25, 2000 to: Riverside Casino attn: Steve Down fax #: (206) 244 -4542 re: ATACS Property Development from: Rick Lentz pages: One Met with Jack Pace (Planning Director) and Alexa Berlow (Planer assigned to the project) Friday afternoon about requirements for the casino project. The moritorium for casinos has been lifted, but the city almost decided to disallow them outright. The position of the city now is to allow projects that are more upscale than the typical existing casino. They also want to discourage "Landmark" projects - ones that draw undue attention to the site. This to set the stage for the comments that carne from the meeting. There are 4 major issues to be resolved, two more than we thought we had at the start of the meeting. 1. The Maule Avenue .vacation has to be completed I believe this is underway with the city, and requires no more attention from us, but we should keep an eye on the progress to be sure it keeps moving towards final approval. At this time it is not a hinderance to the project, 2. The shoreline determination may have an impact on the existing building The use of the project is changing, so an outright grandfathering of the project is not necessarily automatic. The shoreline development standards requires that no activity be undertaken in the first 40' from the normal high water line of the river. It was suggested that we consider demolishing a portion of the building and landscape the area to be compatable with riverfront development standards. Meetings need to be scheduled between the engineer and various county/state officials to secure their input so that a direction can be decided. 3. The proposed building exterior, t� be blunt, cannot be supported by staff in the report made to the Board of Architectural Review, the group that decides the fate of the Design Review. They would prefer something more upscale or elegant. They don't say, we CAN'T do this, but if we do it will definitely extend the approval process, and most likely have to undergo significant changes anyway, if directed by the B.A.R. 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747 -3177 ■ FAX 4251747 -7149 E -Mail mlarchillat@isornedia.com -' JUL -25 -2000 14:11 FROM:OMR RST.SBD 1 4257477149 TO:206 431 7975 P.002/002 4. The resolution of the 140th Street placement. The engineer is meeting with the city tip see what options are possible. Everyone is pointing at the survey discrepancy as the culpret, but no solution has been identified yet. One possibility would be to include this work in the site development, so that we can at least gain use of the land for parking. We should meet soon to review these questions and determine the course of action. The engineer is, close to Tukwila, so I would recommend that we schedule a meeting at his office. Let me know what your schedule would be. cc: Greg Diener, Pacific Engineering Steve Jones, Foster, Pepper & Shefelman, PLLC Le:e1-0 L.N-15i0vt?04-0 2f7 2 V D'; .cnw: w , w 0. J; - D; 1- uJ . Z1-, ,Z ° WW U. 101-'1 W; H Z 111 ui.. • O• :2': 4 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc ,..,. PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. PHONE LOG ❑ CONFERENCE ❑ CML ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS MEMO ❑ INFO ❑ PROJECT ID l< tw/ 1 t^ `4 R rz5-t'ilv;2 rvJT 4 61a1.1 et, :} tfr), PROJECT NO. 0 ° 19 INCOMING CALL ❑ DAZE I 1 16-00 1IME OUTGOING CALL ❑ PERSON DK //l OeIIIPAN�- A i IV A- o'-k- - V 4 4-(.-,s PHONE NO. FAX NO. DISTRIBUI1ON: F1LED • t;'Ai -1t 4, • t: 'ant G1 -r*Pn +::. r is tut r go t- 3k e:ro t1� VI.Jt- 'Jtv Jett- : -1-10,P1 itz) i . 47 za,e_- r. II 6 40v1D4j' L•° eiA/bi`Ft 6 1/J, 6 Co D ° - p-iE - r I.. . ; -., 3l /a t• SIGNATURE 4800 S. 1 BETH ST., SUITE 360, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 206/431-7970 FAX/431-7975 1 J . ».,...,........ . z • Q = F- UJI U. • N .C3;... ;W =;.. • O!: • I-_ ..z i W • U p' i0 N ::o 1• • :H �I u. 0 ,� z; • z FIGURE 6.4.1.A PRECIPITATION FOR MEAN ANNUAL STORM IN INCHES (FEET) 11 6.4.1 WETPONDS — BASIC'AND LARGE — METHODS OF ANALYSIS ST 1.0/ LA 1.2 ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA. 0.9 LA 1.0 0.54" (0.045') P-71 Incorporated Area ...c=o River /Lake 0.47 "' Major Road (0.039') 0.52" NOTE: Areas east of the eastemmost isopluvial should use 0.65 ( 0.043 ' u .5 6 " inches unless rainfall data is available for the location of interest 24 The mean annual storm is a conceptual storm found by dividing the annual precipitation by the total number of storm events per year (0.047') result, generates large amounts of runoff. For this application, till soil types include Buckley and bedrock soils, and alluvial and outwash soils that have a seasonally high water table or are underlain at a shallow depth (less than 5 feet) by glacial till. U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) hydrologic soil groups that are classified as till soils include a few B, most C, and all D soils. See Chapter 3 for • classification of specific SCS soil types. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual :? . 9/1/98 -2/1• . ,4(1/44‘q 4-- 00r.) ta AR.0-111 diwy- A 71,t 0)1-1 AL: C, /tj- tatAftiJG 6 11 n • • e czi It N N1 0 • 1 G G O 0 o a G 0 u a° t^ 0 b° 4 r> ,4-- `}- -- \ N r ..; 0 • M .4 Z mow, U: O 0 N D' W I:: .J H: • LL; wO g IL Q; !-w F- O' z :0 Nr 1:1i —,, w w` = U.. 11 a • w Z co O F" :Z 11/16/00 1:34:20 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 1 TUKWILA RESTAURANT AND CARD ROOM STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WQ VAULT SIZING BASIN ID: EXa002 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2.01 Acres RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PRECIPITATION 2.00 inches TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min BASIN SUMMARY NAME: Existing 2 -y• Storm ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 30.00 impTcReach - Sheet L: 300 impTcReach - Shallow L: 200 PEAK RATE: 0.78 cfs VOL: BASIN ID: EXa010 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2.01 Acres RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PRECIPITATION • 2.90 inches TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERV IMP AREA..: 0.08 Acres 1.93 Acres CN 85.00 98.00 TC 6.24 min 8.17 min ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 . 00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 . 00 ks:27.00 s:0.0050 0.29 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min NAME: Existing 10 -yr Storm ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 30.00 impTcReach - Sheet L: 300 impTcReach - Shallow L: 200 PEAK RATE: 1.16 cfs VOL: BASIN ID: EXa100 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2.01 Acres RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PRECIPITATION 3.90 inches TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERV IMP AREA..: 0.08 Acres 1.93 Acres CN 85.00 98.00 TC 6.24 min 8.17 min ns:&.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 .00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 .00 ks:27.00 s:0.0050 0.44 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min NAME: Existing 100-yr.Storm ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 30.00 impTcReach - Sheet L: 300 impTcReach - Shallow L :. 200 PEAK RATE: 1.59 cfs VOL: BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERV IMP AREA..: 0.08 Acres 1.93 Acres CN 85.00 98.00 TC 6.24 min 8.17 min ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 .00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 .00 ks:27.00 s:0.0050 0.61 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min H Es t; V -4 S 5 RE *MT -floc' agir Gaiw L is 1 MiW v i o vS 11/16/00 1:34:25 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc TUKWILA RESTAURANT AND CARD ROOM STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WQ VAULT SIZING page 1 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: DEV002 NAME: Developed 2 -yr Storm SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2.01 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV PRECIPITATION - 2.00 inches AREA..: 0.47 Acres 1 TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 86.00 98 TC 5.00 min 5. ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 30.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 210.00 kc:42.00 s :0.0050 PEAK RATE: 0.70 cfs VOL: 0.26 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DEV010 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA RAINFALL TYPE PRECIPITATION TIME INTERVAL • • NAME: Developed 10 -yr Storm 2.01 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPE1A PERV 2.90 inches AREA..: 0.47 Acres 10.00 min CN • 86.00 TC 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 30.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 s :0.0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 210.00 kc:42.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 1.09 cfs VOL: 0.40 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min 1 98 5. IMP . 54 Acres .00 00 min BASIN ID: DEV100 NAME: Developed 100 -yr Storm SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2.01 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV PRECIPITATION 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.47 Acres 1 TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 86.00 98 TC 5.00 min 5. ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L.: 30.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 210.00 kc:42.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 1.52 cfs VOL: 0.57 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min IMP . 54 Acres . 00 00 min IMP .54 Acres . 00 00 min : °`. z re w 62 JU oo u� w _. W=. J H jO LL Q CS d` ul. zf.. F-0. z w U� O -. �OH W W. I CI u.. 0. •z" O z ig �• P:\Project Files \00019 \0019 drainage report.doc PHOTOS 03/30/2000 Photos Downloaded 3-29-2000 Project # 00019 03/30/2000 • 03/30/2000 3 0 03/30/2000 4 • - 03/30/2000 z Z ¢ • 2 40 O 0 co a • W _I_ • W WO LL • Q co =d � W z= 1- O Z1- W � • p U O P— p F- Ww F- - tL O .. z WU (4 — F. _ O~ z 03/30/2000 6 .1i ti L. 0 0 ‘‘../ 03/30/2000 7 4) 03/30/2000 z Z CL w 00 U) a cow ILI --I I-. U_ w 0 D- LL < I w z I-0 z 1— W aj D0 0 U) C) -- 0 F- EU Lu 1 c) F- -- UL F- -- C) 2! c) Up 0 1— z ti 03/30/2000 9 ,3 0 3 1.11 1 yJ S tq a c nE'ti":7.:... ! ma .a , • ' , a ..,-.7-' ' �i �4ixY+',> I"} `'1 " ` . �o"�'_'.� — � —�..! , ` :<. .� . __,-,t .t . \�\ ! I.,.': • mo`:•-- nl. m r": -` ‘ • — • ,ll V 9 2 4 l0 03/30/2000 Z �Z ce w J 0 U0 W J N w a =a �w Z= �0 Z1— w U O — O H W W 2 LL Z W U= 0 Z 03/30/2000 11 !'h , • • • • . _. -1L-1 >s• 03/30/2000 12 ..... : ..k.,;.,,-.-2.7.'f:4,:lt.c4t4-:' •::' kt......$0.7•t.-"- ,,r,fe•,....W.-k...":„.,44 ,..........4::,:•• -- ''''. 2'*-7;1-ft.Ai':,•:--.:"....:..-,1,....A., ,.."%.*:`:;:,' '.... ...„;:-.1'•:<.,,,,,, '"'''..V.,..v.p.A. h-c.:-..-.. • . . ...„.., ...s. ....-.--c.'''' . ... . ...,, . . . ......-,;.,....,,,,.,.....clf,......, .:-. ,. ... . .: ,:.?.?. ...-' • '''i: ...:' - 2, ‘.''.....--.- -..:-..:.. ,.., :. : ..... ........: -,;,.., ,... . .., ..., , ._...„,s...—.....:--,tt.....4), - . ., - . . . • .. ...... ..... 'f...„,..ti:', .re .;,:•,,,.. ,,:r.i.','::....;;;•,;•••:';',Wrr ■CA111,.........e.--- ...-40,'' ...NEN s'.....7-74,•,Z., • ,; - T4 Wall. nib z 1 z re Ill 0 0 UJI U) a --I 0)LL Lij 0 CC < w I C5 L11 Z 1— 0 Z F— L1.1 uj D 0 O cL) I- LL! 0 1— r— U. 1— — 0 Z w • -± O I- CA- • 03/30/2000 13 .....- - .,1r,..,,,•:::::,:•:;;•• - -1 t ' - 4 . . ' i i g. 5 : 7 • ' • ' ; : ; . ! 7 • , . : - - Y:SkYjr4f,;■■••••- •• ..- . ..1,....• . , . ';',':!:...s..!.. •'" .,...•.'.::::.`,-;,.,'!,:!!../ ...: ; .,, .n. . .,,,, - # • (.. ••- z 4,....• . • :7.1:: : •••.:...;4:4'...- ••:.,:. - ......:•• •-•••• -,4-c....f...;),-..:-. • ' •• ...-1 ••-..:.„: ....1A. • • ••••••••;•.., • ••■ •■ • .••. • A ..rjreeP . • • -1 • • .- . • : : L •••& • 0 Q 113 • -I :1.1 • • 4. • '7 r"..r.la • ••■ 0.1 03/30/2000 14 11- z Lu ce 2 ..j0 00 CD ° cow 111 —1 1— U) u_ w 0 re 1• .1 LL. < co w z 0 z F- LU • cf) O — O I- L! w 1— o . Z -• 1 03/30/2000 15 z �z r:e W 2 JU 0 co 0 u)W J = F-- Ll WO u 2 a W Z = I- F- O ZF- W Dp U OE/2 pH Ww Li- O z UW U I- O~ Z 0 4j) 03/30/2000 16 der 5 '1 1 'LJ • 03/30/2000 17 • n.. z • Z • CW O 0 u) o cnw W = H U) W W O • < =• O 1— W_ Z Z� W W O • D- O 1— WW I- .. W U= O~ Z 03/30/2000 19 z • w 6 JO O 0 _1• _ 2W WO �< • 0 w Z_ I- O ZI- W w U 0 O C 0 I- WW 2 O .. Z U.1 U= O Z aft AUG -08 -2000 18:16 FROM:CMA RST.S° 1 4257477149 TO ?064313665 P.001/002 MERRICK LENTZ ARC ECT F A X t r a n s m i t t a I date: AN.IC 8, /4=7 to: Gt-r-e 'NKt.sILA attn: A 7%A i € .i fax #: (2ot')431 3445 re: L 1IEZ,AS G3WD, CA fN10 from: 124(.4 t—T'Z Pages: 2 SEE ATIA4409 $t:StCE ftitr4 P(1 Si~-0 g. cr4s LIE AP.E caa5 tmui.I4 cerho L154}t Niel mAJo salLioN4 14)/N146 MAT GJ ULeNTUr SAT os A P* *TLc*4 OF /it 4d 12►VEt. 1II t goN Mtrr.0 r fbeTcohi AF 114E SaTE, -r tlsot,LAD ezv cz TOE 60(1-101k4 Aecla Sif S zt7 5F-.' t E THETA logoPosE 'ro Lox1 k1 e r '5U l oimc "A" ANO "8" To Canoe-405AM rbR T E R-E'o Jceo Stst)4, keeps, ToN6 Woo tx Ploy APIVoxi M `( 1(20:3 Tyr klothilo 13E LotATEv Dime 114i;74 100' rttim " (n 1 ti-1414 witrek Tkhs 1.5 P9-63�V ¶o wrifire, OISG1)55iat1 O+3 ' arni c 1; 44 A15 r QE ) Tv SOF:M.93E At°iVotf,g,. WE HIVE imtTiA p .54.0E( To tGE)-flPj Tfit poctr. Loa -c '4 av -n-IE 401 /4„0' l /od 5511 K LA6 , Al—lick. THE qo' L46 stiow iJ R,ct►,, is y Y CL-AXE. matt mik, u 1 *0 E A THE cfibmisrN) To ilENIteisl. - 1800 - 136th Place N.B., Suite 100 Bellevue, Wa..hington 98005 425/747 -3177 • FAX 425/747 -7149 E -Mail mlarchalll@isomedia.com .. '. • State fines Luciano's for shorelir.- violation Tf m NEWS TRIBUNE .NEWS SEARCH State fines Luciano's for shoreline violation Neo fyi 'f -4v a. ap, PrR al- Lets ygif ; e j uep . ty,L Ruston Way casino in March was ordered to close; owners plan to keep it open during appeal 06/27/2000 Susan Gordon; State officials have fined the owners of Luciano's Casino and Ristorante $25,000 after ordering them to shut down the Ruston Way cardroom because it violates state shoreline laws. Department of Ecology officials announced the fine Monday. In March, the agency ordered Luciano's to shut down the casino because it conflicts with the state's Shoreline Management Act. The 1972 law protects the state's shorelines and public access to them by favoring water - related uses. The casino is likely to remain open, at least in the short term. "Everything Luciano's is doing is 100 percent legal and the City of Tacoma has confirmed that," said attorney Mickey Gendler, who represents Luciano's owner Dan Hilger. "There's no violation. We're going to appeal it, and we're going to win." Hilger referred questions to Gendler. The waterfront casino opened in December and is licensed for 13 house - banked card tables. The Tacoma City Council banned new casinos last fall, but gave Luciano's and two other minicasinos elsewhere in town five years to operate. The state fine surprised Gary Pedersen, the city's building and land -use services manager. "They didn't let us know," he said. "The City of Tacoma's position is the same. They are a legal use and gambling is accessory to the prime use of the property, which is restaurant." Luciano's status as the first non - tribal waterfront minicasino in Washington makes it a test case for the Ecology Department's oversight of the Shoreline Management Act. The law requires local governments to create shoreline master plans, or regulations, that support state law. Ecology officials insist that Luciano's casino violates not only the state law but the city regulations. The problem came when Luciano's made the switch from restaurant and lounge to restaurant, lounge and casino, agency officials said. "We would have had to take the same action if they'd turned the building into a dress shop," said Gale Blomstrom, the agency's Southwest Washington shorelands and environmental assistance program manager. "Neither use is water - oriented, as defined by the city's shoreline regulations, and neither use maintains or increases public access to the shoreline." The order and fine can be appealed to the state Shoreline Hearings Board. "It'll all be played out in court," predicted Sandy Howard, an Ecology Department spokeswoman. http: / /search.tribnet. com/ archive / 180 %5Fday %5Farchive /0627b 1 a.html 7/25/00 State fines Luciano's for shore'—, violation ;-° Page 2 of 2 Meantime, Luciano's has won Tacoma hearing examiner approval to expand the 5,000- square -foot business. The casino's gambling license remains intact, although Sherri Winslow, the Gambling Commission's deputy director of operations, noted that licenses can be revoked for violations of state law. "We'll look into it," she said. The commission usually avoids land -use disputes, she said. "Normally, we try to stay out of any zoning laws because zoning is up to the local jurisdiction," she said. This is the first time a casino conflicted with the Shoreline Management Act, she said. Luciano's critic Carol Sloman, chairwoman of the North End Neighborhood Council, was glad to hear that the Ecology Department had fined the casino. "A cardroom should not be operating at any location on the Ruston Way waterfront," she said. "The people of the neighborhood remain concerned." 4 Staff writer Susan Gordon covers the environment and natural resources. Reach her at 253-597 - 8756 or at susan.gordon@ mail.tribnet.com. T RI [fLCSCOHG PRIVACY POLICY 1 USER AGREEMENT COPYRIGI rr i ADVERTISING' CONTACT US The New Media Division of The News Tribune 1999 Tacoma News Inc. 1950 South State Street, Tacoma, Washington, 98405, 253 - 597 -8742. http : / /search.tribnet.com/archive/ 180 %5Fday %SFarchive /0627b1a.html 7/25/00 > ,.. „ : June 22, 2000 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 — 136th Place N.E.Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Las Vegas Boulevard Restaurant and Cardroom Conditional Use (File Number L98 -0100) Design Review (File Number L98 -0101) Shoreline Substantial Development (File Number L98 -0102) SEPA Environmental Checklist (File Number E98 -0035) Dear Rick Lentz: This letter is to notify you that the moratorium excluding new gambling uses, Ordinance, has been lifted by the City of Tukwila Ordinance 1917. This ordinance was approved by City Council June 14, 2000. Ordinance 1917 repeals ordinance Numbers 1867, 1873, and 1893, which affected your development, permits. A copy of Ordinance 1917 is attached for your reference. To date, your project remains incomplete. I am aware that several issues on the list of incompleteness have been addressed. Other issues are also investigated or in progress. I have attached a copy of the Notice of Incomplete Application letters for the Shoreline Permit and SEPA Checklist, and for the Design Review and Conditional Use Permits. Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss the remaining items and a timeline for your response for completeness. I am in the office Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The direct line telephone number to my desk is (206) 431 -3673. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner ^ Z a. moZ. u6 n 00; om` • U) W NLL. ,W O:. co J'. LL.Q d W: z 1: z �. W uj I- 111 W ~- LL 0 ui z; _ N' H=;: 0 ~n 04/09/99 16:54 CMA REST URANT SUPPLY 2064313665 �, 11 MERRICK LENTZ ARC 1 ECT F A X t r a n s m i t t a date: AFL to: CA- oP TunkuLA fueLic, Wogo attn: J1M Mog cW f a x #: ( ) + 3 3 C 5 re: MAutz Mak3E VA4A1101I • Mt551■4 RANS pages: Tu)p NO.358 P01 "tI Nw- You FDg PRo►toit44 -ME Afol. t4A-nonl 014 -r, liv,pitorcr. I P10 ME1VE GcPie5 op. sticfzukiE PegffirrAffeova.t., of NicE 41-Ica, AN fvu.• St2e0 toplag, LANO5CAA 4c 5l1E`C5 L l ,2, 3•. 1 010 NoT 9 ZEI tar THE a SHORELINE MAT IpW11.41 NO lit 'COArgiA-rtVE f 44 p‘geitnEar t4 irA li ¥vu. -sra fo1 MAT . IT eo5,51i3LE aearAIni 11E5E Tleoc R Yo.) Teel ArPk KIEGEW4 -4 fpg OS "co COMMIE -THL " M15cEU woc5 ?view( /elle- m, MO To atielerE 51001+4 �frA2 THE cok&rruc.-tcor4. (iM tricwoiNK MEM LAMA h15 t r* Rte) '�# 5 AMtIr4 tint log i clt iPE To 4E-r Tit`, weer. c J�5 Sooki A6 fa% tec. 150 Yong Nair NIALuALt To ti5. Rt4141PiT2 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747-3177 ■ FAX 425/747 -7149 E-Mail mlarchl@isomedia.com 1 04/09/99 16:54 CMA RESTAURANT SUPPLY 4 2064313665 11110M111.18 Oir SOW ww...11Mr NO.358 D02 OALT ■ o I1 .f Avc L.I ∎..—br∎— Al o ;j P va.Lrc WORKS r�SPT. •..w • c iir zez ;Er ro f;,f .7� f f t I:� /iii �1 .'51MA/161.1& AAS -_ -- � r� - aECSrv�;�- —' ON MOM a•; pm' CL ..sWry • -©• Alsaw04 MMUMMO • SGEOEOSOS6 PE742tArr ORAWir4C1 .. 03/26/99 18:30 CMA RESTAURANT SUPPLY 4 2064313665 • • •• • , • • •• • • • • MERRICK • • - ::; : LENTZ NO.092 D01 , R� i,.;..i1i) l 131L 1:1 • • • ,..10.. • • Maioh 26; 1999.: • • • • • • + Ms. Jim Morrow • '. ' • • ••City of Tukwila Public Works,, " • • • 6300 Southcenter B1vd,..Suite.1Q0• • , Tukwila, Washington ,981.88:. • •• • • . -Via Fax: {206} 43 I- 3665.. ' • ' • RE:. • •Maule Aveinie'Vacation/O.rdinance #•1702. ••• . . .Dear •Mr: Morrow: ' • :' • • '' • This fetter will confirm our•meeting :set r•'l'huxsday, ,April 1';;9:00 am•'at• your office. To clarify, the•.purpp'se•.of•the meeting: will .: be' toTeview':the•site'improvement requirements ' . necessary',• to complete the: Maule. Avenue' baeation ..There.are'several:points *that would be' • • helpful to'discuss: • •• "' • Myclient will cons/ a ;c inpletiiig; the: physical• work•;need d�tc•satrsfy,the• equirements••of •Ordin mce, #1702: The' purpose• will:l e.to allow the: vaeatioi1•:of Mule Avenueto.be • .com lei • • p �d'and;recoided,:• Iri:retuir3 for this. action; .ifi'.will' be'reiliiested• that.pl'an review for the , .. • •. • pioject,on • the ATACS•property be • allowed•to proceed, • _with• a condition • that all' work required by'the' rdinance will:be eompleted,prior to issuance of ihe..new "ATACS "• • pernn.it, ar other•mutually agreeable:sohition ;, ... • • In 1994 :when the Project- was originally discussed, the•site improvement work was • to have been considered as rnaintenance,work.rathee.than new iniprovenients. This would involve different• permitting• requirements,.which will need•to be confirmed at our meeting. My copy. • • of the ordinance includes :reduced copies of•a Cooperative Parking'• Agreement Drawing and a ' • Shoreline Permit-Drawing. Could you' have fu1t-sized copies, of these sheets available•at our.' . •meeting? This will also help.to conf rm the•exact work needed to•satisfythe requirements of • • • :•. ' Per the Ordinance,' the -City represents that'it wiltsecure a Shoreline Permit for the project. :• Since this permit •includes S11A 'review and other requirements;. all of those items should be • • • • • ' • (or have been) done.by the city. This can be reviewed at our meeting. ' •• • • • ' 1800 -136th Place N.E.; Suite 100 ashington 98005 �' FAX 425/747 -7149 • ' arches ®isomedla.corn • the Ordinance. • , • - • z . i~ • z • • JU; OOO 4. co • w w; • W=: CO • J H;. w Oi • ga. �a mss. . z �, '1— O 1—;. • U �' • a ST ,O H'. • ww • '1- —' •wz . U =; 01- z. 18:30 CMA RESTAURANT SUPPLY 4 2064313665 NO.092 P02 I look forward to meeting with you on Thursday. It is our hope that all issues can be resolved to complete the Ordinance work as originally conceived, and allow the new project at the ATACS site to continue through the plan review process. Sincerely, MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT D. Lentz Principle Architect cc: Steve Dowen i •aa.Zl:. JV UO: ,N.13.,. • .:U) W ?. 'W=. • • U) S: • • W Oi J!. 1.-,111. • _' z• • ;z 17: • uj ' �o :11 W Z'• • U N,' • Off'`. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director February 8, 1999 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 136th Place NE Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Las Vegas Boulevard Casino Dear Mr. Lentz: I am writing to inform you that on February 1' the Tukwila City Council passed ordinance 1867 (enclosed) which started a six month moratorium on the establishment of new gambling uses. Like other communities, the Council is responding to recent changes in state law by seeking time to explore its options regarding the siting of mini casinos and other gambling establishments. This action affects your permit applications because they are still incomplete. I have enclosed the "vesting" section of our Zoning Code. The City is considering ways to allow you to continue working on some elements of your proposed project despite the moratorium: For example, you may continue to work to resolve the issues around the Maule Avenue vacation, file for a lot consolidation for the site, and conduct the traffic and parking studies. Of course the Council may adopt regulations that prohibit your intended development, so all work during the moratorium period would be at your own risk and not vest you with any rights for a gambling use. If you would like to meet to discuss the project or have any questions please call me at (206) 433- 7141. Nora Gierloff Associate Planner CC: Gary Barnett, Public Works Graham Black, City Attorney Enclosures. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 Z re w� 0 0, u)w. • J !, w 0l J,. N D d: I- _. I- 0' Z al Ili i0 .C1 I- -. Lii s:. Z City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director January 22, 1999 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 136t Place NE Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Las Vegas Boulevard Casino • L98 -0101 Design Review L98 -0100 Conditional Use Dear Mr. Lentz: As we discussed earlier I am treating the SEPA and Shoreline applications separately from the consolidated Design Review and Conditional Use applications. Please let me know if you have changed your mind about this approach. Your Design Review and Conditional Use Permit applications for the Las Vegas Boulevard Casino located at 14040 Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila have been found to be incomplete. In order to be complete, the following must be submitted to the permit center: a. As your site plan is dependent on the land in the Maule Avenue right -of -way, review of your project cannot proceed until the Public Works Director determines that you have met the conditions of the "agreement for the exchange and use of real property." This means that the construction required as part of that agreement must be completed prior to beginning this project. I believe that you have corresponded with Bob Giberson from the PW Department about this issue. b. In order for you to obtain building permits you must consolidate the four lots that make up your site by applying and receiving approval for a BLA/Lot Consolidation from Tukwila. Please submit an application to start this process. c. Tukwila does not have a standard for the number of parking spaces required for a casino use. You have approximately 3,900 square feet of casino /card room use in building A that will likely require more parking than the restaurant standard you have used. Please submit a parking study that addresses the parking requirements for casino /card rooms in this area. I understand that you have agreed to complete a traffic study to determine mitigation fees per Tukwila's Concurrency Ordinance. You may wish to submit the traffic study at the same 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z <zi ce w 6 JO. U0 cn w w =; J H' w0 • �Q •1- 0` •Z F-', D no +0 N: w W` • H U w� • O — : • UN. z... Notice. of Incompleteness Page 2 time as the parking study. At the latest the traffic study will have to be completed and any required mitigation fees paid prior to issuance of building permits for the project. d. The legal description on the survey does not include the land across Maule Avenue from the rest of the site. Please provide an accurate legal description of the entire site to be developed. e. Have the responsible party (architect, landscape architect, surveyor) stamp and sign each drawing. f. Show a turn- around behind Building B for fire apparatus. Contact the Fire Department for standards. Provide a sample board showing the colors and materials to be used on the project. Provide information about the external lighting fixtures and how the riverbank and adjacent properties will be shielded from light spillover. Upon receipt of these items, the City will re- review them for completeness and will mail you written notification of completeness or incompleteness within 14 days. I have included review comments from the Building and Parks Departments with this letter. You do not have to respond to them for completeness, though the issues should be addressed in your subsequent Design Review and building permit submittals. These applications will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.105.070(E). If you have any questions with this matter please call me at (206) 433 -7141. Nora Gierloff Associate Planner CC: Gary Barnett, Public Works Nick Olivas, Fire Department Ken Nelson, Building Department Don Williams, Parks Department Enclosures. z S • 1- re w: 6 =. J0: O 0 ` cnuw: w•= I-: � w w0 g• � w ¢ = d' I— al Z 0. U� O N' o 1' ww. U u. w.N z BUILDING DIVISION REVIEW DATE: PROJECT NAME: APPLICATION NO: PLAN REVIEWER: Jan. 8, 1999 Las Vegas Boulevard Casino land use applications L98 -0100, L98 -0101, and L98 -0102 Ken Nelsen, Plans Examiner (206) 431 -3670 The following items are Building Division concerns. 1) The proposed change of use /occupancy requires consideration for; a. Type of construction compatible with the proposed occupancy per U.B.C. b. Washington State Energy Code upgrade. c. Washington State Barrier free Code. d. Seismic structural analysis and upgrade. e. Sprinkler system. 2) It must be identified which property the area separation wall is on and responsibility must documented for the walls joint maintenance. 3) City files appear to indication the existing bulkhead may be a part of the exit system for the adjoining Riverside Inn. Please clarify. 4) Identify the interior scope of work for building "B ". 5) Barrier free parking is discouraged from crossing vehicular traffic areas. Half of the proposed barrier free parking should be relocated to the adjoining Northwest side of building "B ". No further comments at this time. .z ~ W' ..J U; 00: ,co W =: co LL, W o'• 2 u. Q, N D. • w o• Z I- . U� E-: • :=W V LL ui z — 0 ~' • The proposed project shows a Building "C" fronting city park property in the Northeast corner of the site. We request that the landscape buffer be continued all of the way to the river and not stop half way. The type of tree/shrub should fit the desired goal of screening; however, trees such as poplars should not be used because of the surface roots. In addition, the vacation of Maul Avenue cannot be supported until problems related to Maul Avenue in other areas are resolved. D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at ! u kw, )4 (city), j4/,t i '� (state), on , 199 5. rg Dw (Print Name) / ir° i-Air un -613 416--s ku L4- 4 - tv Jct. (Address) (Phone �. b.er) (Signature) 1 Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. = z. �� CO CD wI. CD 'Li w 0' J u-_ Cl, 1- W,. z� I- 0. zI-;. ut ,0 • N oI- 11.1 =V lij z, z. CITY OF Tl WILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION Planner: Receipt Number::: FOR•STAFF USE ONLY. File Number: egg, . pip 2. Application: complete:( Date -8-01 Project File #: g 1 SEPA File r Application incomplete (Date: I - I. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: LW) NI CiA4 B. LOCATION. OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: 4040 II\TTZURBANL PAIEI\\UE Sotsn ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 33(05IIO -1035 336.661 o - IO2 a 33 5°l0 - l026- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Quarter: 5W Section: 14- Township: 2314 Range: 4f (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: R1cK L E r2/ MEg.lcK.LE CZ -x&11 Mci ADDRESS: 1600 13&4 PLPC . NE. sL1T!✓ ioo) ELLEVc)E I W,SIr (1 oo PHONE: 425 r% -31% ' 25 4 - 14 . SIGNATURE: / /�/ /iiil1 //-��!` DATE: 9- .\ PECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DEC 2 9 1998 PERMIT CENTER E. CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: 6/ LI F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: MAN° FAeTO Rtt419 O5E7 CP. Arlx� G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) - tiot IOUK5V. OW ICi6) CA 11103) NVt )i C-- STbrKE � CVN SfzPE Mo L-i1- rPcIM i L-' 411611._I_ t LY ltq (0E‘icAn 5clo' ) ) 1 I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed development: (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal) Go►JsTtnnc rioKI COST - #7501000 ((ao Deb r: E 4 J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: mtIAt -C I MPRoV EM "C T o cot3VIEaT EC1si 1sJ61 Mr4R . &J LLoi Y To e ESTAu faiW A-N1t C HAP ac v'\, ItA 6,0Ot l ow i i,IA of eixb -rat ig fAUt t k • PNCo -T.0k4E SPA4E PLUS LANIDS4VOGI ANO ZLZel, EXT. 6A.VATt \IS 11\fi jEoad K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) NA L. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: ATM ti 11415 . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: S %eTEM:YI' 114161 . (If project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates:) M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: tJotJE f 2oPo . rb SSE eN1151o1.14? pgo5E1D W1ria-}ItNI 40' o- iZNf-gs .. McDIFICA -oor. oV EA5Tiki 13011,01KVt E'1 o12 VJA4,112 15 on\U- W1 i'.' PeO?oSE1P 1I min.\ Tf -4d Um1-C N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 ". 3 z H W; re -I C.) U o N C COW: W =: CO t : W o'. u- j. Z d: W Z o. z ►- W uj U� O N; o I-. Ww X t) Z W O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): CIsTII4 ABC- 6 fM oregv •1 hle.1 E um-\ ANA SOO1 14(0.141 STR -+SEC To ee eE- ribktrc). P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING/LOADING /STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high water mark.) PA\NA DE EX1S flr\1Ci ?Mt r4 k.EA IS SET 1A(. (oo' KoM THE Yoe or eiVE MKK Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark) eXy-slt.1 4 6ci t DiK To .6E QETAi0L j DEC.o -A-nUE aErn CS ASP u 1i4 FT�.ItJ-t of EXISTItJ4 ET C- Tu--Eb To eE 4s' MAXI >n M HEi‘r t.. R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: K o W o e,K 6 P2oPo5E'o a.) tZN E'2 M-s k oR Lo riH-1 i\1 40' D r Tae of K EXCENerf fOR MoVIfILA`1OQS -Co 1'iXISTIt.1CI 1301UOINI VA., ./PTiorJ15 . II. TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, ,delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 4 z i1 w re JU U0 ,..No ww J I•: w w0 2 co Q. =d I- w _ z� z o. LL! uj no 0 -:. 0I- w u. O. .z W O z III. OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. ❑ Tukwila Conditional Use Permit ❑ Tukwila Variance Permit ® Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: TtiKW t1- SEPA decision date: 53 Tukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval ❑ Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood Ord. #1462) Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ❑ Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) ❑ Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of rim" - Fish & Wildlife) ❑ Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Aquatic. Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) PERMIT # ❑ Other: APPLICATION DATE DATE APPROVED 1212q /q8 12jt.q(gv l2 /2gJgt, 12%2' /qt, SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 5 z • H z • �QQw J„. o O': • J =• Wo = d. • _. • z� • 1- o CU F-. D 0 0. O N: 0 H LI O. ui z 01- z CITY OF T k- KWI LA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development (DCD). Please contact the DCD if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until the application is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vesting of the applicant's rights. However, submittal of these materials in no way limits the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. The DCD Planning staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application • Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) (aNE) ® Shoreline Permit Application Fee ($550) SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) (oNE) • SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) 71 Design Review Permit Application (if building permit required) (6 copies) ($900) (oNE) ❑ Utility Permit Application for Flood Control Zone (4 copies) ❑ Utility Permit Application for Storm Drainage Review (4 copies) PLANS [Six (6) copies of the following]: Pi Vicinity map showing location of the site. 71 Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's property lines. 71 Survey at a scale of 1" = 20' or 1".30', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the surveyor with surveyor's original signature. The following information must be contained on the survey: NSA O 0 Property dimensions, lot size and names of adjacent roads Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, base flood elevation (100 -year flood) For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment Existing watercourses ard- wetland (i# -any), with required buffers (TMC 18.45.040) Existing grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% Existing trees over 4" in diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved Mean High Water Mark and �* �Z 0O' N J =. U) w; w O' g J: u_ =O w, z�` �- o' w O It 0 I- w w • H LL z cd U =. z. • N/A CI Shoreline profile cross- r— Itions at minimum 75 -foot intervals aft,— site's shoreline, showing: O Existing top of bank, ldndward catch -point of levee, riverbank Loe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O Proposed structures /improvements O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels O Limits of the River Environment, 60 -foot Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment O Existing and proposed ground elevations O Plan view location of shoreline profile cross - sections • Site plan at same scale as survey, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the architect. The following information must be contained on the site plan: : Property lines and names of adjacent roads O Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) .. Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment • Existing watercourses ), with required buffer widths (TMC 18.45.040) • Proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond the subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% 1 Construction limit lines, and areas of clearing/grading /filling - Notations identifying source, composition, volume (cu. ft.) and extent (acres) of any fill material - Notations identifying composition, volume (cu. ft.) extent (acres) and proposed disposal site of any extracted material IVA 0 Erosion control measures and tree /buffer protection measures (e.g. barricades, fencing). O Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with required setbacks O Lowest finished floor elevation O Location of driveways, fire lanes, parking, loading and service areas, with parking calculations and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening .? Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas • Location of site furniture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art Location and type of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications, including any trail easements N/A 0 Dike /riverbank maintenance easement (min. width: 30' riverward from catch -point of levee) O Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of utilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications O Conceptual storm drainage plans with storage, detention and water - quality improvements (see Utility Application requirements for Storm Drainage Review) O Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences al Landscape /planting plan at same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be contained on the plan: . WA 0 Existing trees to be saved by size and species O Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing O Location of service areas, vaults and mechanical units with proposed screening. z Z. • w u6i� J U' O 0' J X W O ga N D. = o w Z zj.—. I-0 z� w uj 2 Uca C3 w uj lc H L0 wz 0 .► z 4 • • ^MI Building elevations an( -''oor plans at a scale of 1/4" = 1' or 1,'= 1' with graphic scale and date. Each sheet shall have the license stamp of the architect. Include on the elevations: .0 Dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements TO Location and type of exterior building lighting O Location of mechanical units with proposed screening O Floor plan and square footage for uses Si One (1) high quality 8 1/2" x 11" reduction of the above plans. If the project undergoes significant z a H Z,. M APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO SHORELINE PERMIT QUESTIONS & DESIGN POLICIES Written ,..,, w responses to attached Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application questions and Shoreline 6D" ' Design Policies (6 copies). N o' ' w w 21 OTHER MATERIALS ' J co LL Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate, such as w O: color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to be considered, 2 , eight (8) . copies of each must be submitted (except models). .Color drawings or photos may be g submitted as 8.5 x 11 -inch color photocopies. N d �11J ju w. PUBLIC NOTICE: Z ~ 1-- O' AKing County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the Z subject property. r 0 Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) o �, within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. O apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included.) See Attachment A. '= w 0 A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on -site within 14 days of the Department F- F: determining that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B. LI 0 ui z U = R. O~ z changes, an additional set of reductions may be required. IV. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES A. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) eGpt..OtY VEy Et oP 1 E'5T f0t3lAG Ac6E55 CIeC ULIRTIOt4 CoN SEP--JATIOf4 B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) ALL, REV L Lofinest V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commercial /development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. 3. Preference should be given to commercial /industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 6 ��, . Christopher Brown of Associates 9688 rainier Ave:. (Seattle, WA 98118-5981 206 T22 -1910 Fax 206 T22-1909 Mr. Gary Barnett, P.E. Senior Engineer - Development Department of Public Works City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: November 5, 1998 Traffic Impact Analysis Preliminary review The Riverside Inn versus The Riverside Casino Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trips Dear Mr. Barnett: I.stopped by your office yesterday (November 4th) to see what traffic volume and accident data you may have on file along Interurban Avenue from I -5 to I -405. Similarly, I met with the developers and the architect for the above casino to review such items as project scale, access and so on. Indeed, I even started to assess the use of the zip code addresses of clients as a means of defining the trip distribution. However, on a close examination.of new expected trip generation versus trip generation in former days, namely pre - January 1998, it appears that the new usage, while generating larger daily traffic volumes, produces smaller p.m. peak hour volumes. Given this unusual outcome it would seem to me that there is no need for a traffic study, per se. It goes without saying that while I would look forward to the challenge of such an impact analysis with this kind of land use it would serve no useful SEPA related purpose. Accordingly, may I ask you to review the attached letter on trip generation and, if you agree, then delete the TIA element of the application? In advance, thanks for your time and understanding on this matter. Yours truly, C. V. Brown, P.E. encl. zd RECgIVED CITY of TUKWII.A DEC 2 9 1998 PERMIT CEATES Traffic Engineers 0% Transportation Planners SJ L I DOSS)J HMO E Sb : L Z 86, SO AON Christopher Drown Cif hatoeiates 9688 Ralnicr Ave. 8. Seattle, WA 98118 -5981 206) 7224910 Fax (206) 722 -1909 Mr. Steven B. Dowen, Owner The Riverside Casino 14060 Interurban Avenue S. Tukwila, WA 98168 November 5, 1998 Re: The Riverside Inn and The Riverside Casino P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation Dear Mr. Dowen: Thank you for meeting with me this morning and reviewing the former site usage against the current building and its proposed neighboring, expanded use and existing neighboring usage. Briefly, the former use, I 'recall it as the Riverside Inn, was a 650 seat capacity restaurant with an attendant bar /dance floor. For its traffic generation I would suggest that it complies with the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Land Use Code 832 which includes facilities with bars that also serve both lunch and dinner. Trip production, defined in the 6th edition of the Trip Generation Manual for LUC 832, Mich- Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant is noted below in Table I. TABLE I Trip Generation - The River ide In Time Period Traffic Volumes A.W.D.T. P.M. inbound P.M. outbound 3,140 Trips /day 158 veh. /hour 115 veh. /hour You might wish to note that traffic . impacts with commercial facilities, such as this, are all associated with the p.m. peak hour of the street system since that is the most heavily traveled time of the day in that it carries both home -based work 8•d Traffic Engineers Transportation Planners S31WI00SSd'8NM02i3 Sb:LI 86, S0 AON �Z, 2 -J UO: N D; W CO LL_, wO g LL.<. w` HO zr_ U.1 uj 0— 0 H: w W; 1- — z Ham; z Mr. Steven B. Dow`, Owner November 5, 1998 page 2 trips as well as social, shopping and recreation travel. In essence, for the purposes of this discussion the p.m. peak hour is the focus of any traffic impact analysis. That is the time z of day and associated traffic generation that is used for arterial street impact assessment, not the least being how well_- w:. your driveways function, and so on. Next, the new facility includes a restaurant in the same _.1 v0'. building as before but reduced in scale to 330 seats -- the ' N W reduction being undertaken to accommodate gaming tables and so Ill I. on. In addition, the new building next door will have 9,800 w LL g.s.f. also devoted to gaming. w 0 The trip generation for the smaller restaurant is shown below in g-' Table II and is based-on ITE LUC 831 for a Quality Restaurant. N D This is applicable given the time your clientele are expected to = be on the premises. Z 1-0 • z 1-: TABLE II g n. D 1 Trip Generation - The Riverside Casing 0 - '3 t-% Based on Quality Restaurant per ITE LUC 831 = w 1--U r: L Time Peri,od Tr &ffic Volumes - t 0 ui z cn A.W.D.T. P.M. inbound • P.M. outbound. 944 Trips /day 57 veh. /hour 29 veh. /hour Next, the only available ITE data for casino facilities are published under LUC 473 for Casino /Video Lottery Establishment (6th edition, page 742). Its also limited to only the p.m. peak hour of the adjacent street. Its data is shown below. b'd TABLE III Trip Generation - Caino Addition ITE LUC 473, 9,800 g.-s.f. Tine Period Traffic Volumes P.M. inbound P.M. outbound 74 veh. /hour 58 veh. /hour S3.WIOOSSd'8NM0aE 9b:LT 86, S8 AON . . -1 Mr. Steven B. Dovia, Owner November 5, 1998 page 3 Continuing, about 3,500 g.s.f. of space is used from the old Riverside Inn for gaming. According to ITE this space would likewise produce some limited peak hour traffic. This is shown in Table IV. TABLE IV Tri• ener_ •n - -sin • ar f the Riverside Inn ITE LUC 473, 3,500 g.s.f. Time Period Traffic Volumes P.M. inbound P.M. outbound 26 veh./hour 21 veh. /hour Last, your expansion program to the northwest will displace adjacent sales and /or light manufacturing businesses with an estimated employee count of 12.to 15. These would typically depart the site in the p.m. peak hour and, accordingly, reduce the basis of the prior land use trip count. Assuming the displaced business are light manufacturing in nature, certainly not a poor assumption considering activities such as auto re- build, then ITE LUC 110, General Light Industrial, would apply. The p.m. peak hour trip data for this use is shown in Table V. TABLE V Trip Generati on - General Ligh Industrial, Displaced ITE LUC 110, 12 Employees Time Period, Traffic Volumes P.M. inbound 1• veh. /hour P.M. outbound 4 veh. /hour To estimate the approximate peak hour traffic impacts for your proposed, expanded facility the traffic demands from the new S'd S31WIOOSSd'NMOL18 9 ':LT 86, SO AON Vr. . Steven B. Dow..41, Owner November 5, 1998 page 4 usage need to be subtracted from the original usage to see if there is a positive, negative gain or a neutral trade -off. For the p.m. peak hour of the arterial street the net new traffic data is shown below. TABLE V P.M. Peak 13our Volumes:_ O1d (vs . New Users Original Use Inbound Outbound Total, Peak Riverside Inn 158 Adjacent Light Ind. 1 Total, Former Uses 115 4 273 vph 5 vph 278 vph 'Ziew Uses Inbound Outbound Total, Peak Casino, restaurant 5.7 29 86 vph Casino, gaming. 26 21 47 vph New Casino, adjacent 74 58 132 vph ■ Total, New Uses 265 vph From the above you will see that in terms of the p.m. peak hour of the adjacent arterial street system the new facility produces less traffic than formerly found at the site and at the adjacent. property. Indeed, there is a small reduction in the peak hour traffic, about (278 -265) 13 trips per hour so that fundamentally your new facility is a traffic mitigation measure. This is not to mean your daily traffic is less. Rather, with your peak hour beginning after about 7:00 p.m. and continuing through the night 1 would expect your "daily traffic" to be much larger. However, in the context of traffic impacts, the new use is a betterment since it reduces the peak hour loading. This leads to the next issue. Since the proposed development reduces the p.m. peak hour volume there is little reason to conduct a traffic study, per se. Indeed, as a traffic mitigation measure I would suggest you request that a traffic study not be a requirement of your building application. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. 9'd cvb /s cc Gary Barnett, F.E. Yours truly, C. V. Brown, P.E. S31dIOOSSd'8NM0aE Lb:LI 86, SO AON z _1- ~ w: J0. 0 O CO 4. o', cn w' w z; J� w O, g Q . z�' Z 0. w w.. U� 0 — wW h=- U. z w U1. O ~, z • \ \ of ea 11.10104 -ro rett ply. • r r v=- , NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN .-` i.`, THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. \ \\ G)y T� /\,��<�<\' r\ HC \tip;.•';1" t OIE'SIeti RE499[Y j \ ,< \ ,1 NC 1 RIVERS/ ?E ;I;} „m. \ `\ \\ �: d�/r , , `` i CASINO\' DRAWING TITLE 1111 Muc', g� 1_J_ °^ o°p° ; '• \ \ Zl ✓✓✓ SITE PLAN i I �� \\ \ \� \ SHEET INDEX Q \ t'�,�/ �^' \ OR-I.0 SITE PLAN �16- 51DEPIALK CURB DETAIL \ \ \\/ ; Sor OR-T.0 DTNINasEATINGPLAN yuae�vr.rc \ \ o q� DR.3.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS '.�,' \ \ \Sb e4 DR-1.0 WALL SECTIONS \ • _ - \\\ DR-5.0 BUILDING SECTIONS DATE 1Lr 3,,200, , \\ \ DR-LI.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE t DR•EI.0 ELECT.SITE LIGHTING RAWN SY [�.T••COICLAM°.e \ \ CHECKED SY ,.,,,,,,,D.e[ a.ilk ( .Y.°N[DR[C•R:r/ \, PARKING PROVIDED • _I_ `\ FULL SIZE: 17 \ COMPACT: 39 • III"Ill!. \ \ ACCESSIBLE 3 r�'_ JI 1- \ \ TOTAL: 131 v SITE PLAN 0 DR-1.0 I. EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL yam.[.I�•.r4 • f y � �'"-[ �i` r ''W:-5-I e�, :NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN pt=liN'�"!: .-` - .-` - Y THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • ON,:nwt•a+004.6,...00 G .J n Q- 0 s.--1 ._ . -- �- -- nova nAnou VIM 0 0 0 0 0 DR-2.0 DINING/SEATING FLOOR PLAN • . . - .. — . ... F" i t,...y,..�.. ""r v4 t{ _ii r, e F °n T --� .? •1 1a� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN (•� }�% ,- `R Y r ^~, '. THIS NOTICE IT IS.DUE TO,THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT._„- - ;= sr • er ( IMAMS ` DR-3.0 WEST ELEVATION DETAIL-TYP.SCORE LINE • TRASH ENCLOSURE • :,may z y ' ' ,� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN �� THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • �r� u • • • • • • YWR1519D.o9.w �.e.r rpreA,.yr.ron. J O%o1 Ill.sc.t[YTZ._..[[r ... ..,....,... -:-IF • 1 .! I.n 1• • I o I ...... � �� /�10 - MERRICK .. .y...<. ' • LENTZ .. ''.z — w, �F I w:.: �r = —. ARC ITECT WO,sun. ,__ I • / I \ yT .. CR..MrcT.0.011. �r6•o IIRCRMIONERTo a< 1 P 1_ . •ORT.114•••• /1111 w.ow r.xw w• ,reo TOO. I B0.116,Flare E.Sun S I / } 217F71177 FAX R7.N77149 DR-4.0 • r, ; ' t>� :r }F t t �',— ._ ',NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN ;,,..404,, _.Yxr. ;' THIS NOTICE IT IS DUETO_THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT, L 7L':�� tt, (ycnx'--s y�yh '`� +'r .i .1 .., F i Sw5 tip ,,,,,�}{•�s n ',.,,, .,-. 1..- , 1 r i,•:.Y%,3_,L,•iiXFS4"s'3"i -1w5H.MG!c...... 3 .er-P,.<-b.-.„-,.t • • DETAIL-DUMpsrER ENCLOSURE • • • kf il r F• :•• ? ,,4 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN k - " { 75 THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. r S Wit? s �N � S ?�fh.I p a• • r=, . ./ ,-,..-,..ckv •,,,, ,-..•N,,,. ,,- LI.c 0,0.0n.1.1000.. c \�aoy MERRICK c'.c, • c c \ 06 o ,.... CABIN " tl i�C I C l ` \ \ C JOT' `�O9•.4� • GC.Ma MKT lK pNAtlYM LK I \ \ \ 1\.: • UK 1 . . 5- \\ \ 9�0•�` `J c- \ �o: \. r_ • 1� ' 50955.44.E .•oe•- SHED I --- — -7, \ • `;OS \ _ C c N.,-r"-c ov'••:A J.+0Ol'/7OO '.0 T 0000.00000e0 400,0000Rg00P.O:OPPQoAP:QOP_''-ro.Tw- - •jr-• • 0 •..[ I --. y/�� `\O 'x 1 ,'oeeci.�>a TTpe-33G-Q,t,' \ \ "% tO.Oyu` O.� 1 1 � � - - 1 // /� C 1A 1 KO.1360 flare NE.S.Y IGO .\ ' \aJ\ \ lC.. / ` LI • 1 ` it �i T_��, f T l &110+r.R'uY'v[.n vl.'OS '•R^ ,, YC \ 1 __ f T�-1' 1 1 • 1 J13S.TJI72 FAX 0.21p u.. \ v'U\\ t... 1 \ L _ _- i 1 Ea1.I.dYc1.•i®.A.tm .o \ \_�Oj C/\ 1.. I WI."say-......S.•.{L ! a9_-•=1. -T, • �' \\ \ `/9/y� \�o�\/ { c c 'c c� l oay�' •o ff.,.�� r 11 �":—�.= , • n-''°"R'i \ \ o_ ail?{ (^ I—y .\\ f�c C C 1 '` _ ir�j��1 \ "� �� ,, �y.lr.�=. ..ae \ \ ;�• � N. o ` .., �:..•> •Acl,joic-.-1 J T+a+. c co..r O :�l.. 1 T =�p� 1 A. rm• l ..ee. • \ � \ At l0` 1 • y �I. ''''•" e \ \ ? PROJECT NAME c_II-=frTIIIII11a .1-1.,111 !-5=1 / `\ J \ .. `Fba` '\ PROPOSED u-. if=Il- ,�=TI= ro / ��y 6;°, .00 �o \ c `'�J G' CENTRAL �,L [ '•n Grand • u u�►•• jr•- =�so=u- Lae \ \ /%/// °o \ \ CASINO �� _'1 \ s' 1I -arcau- .� O:C�o ..t_•AC.�I ....� •km .,w-man �G /�+ ,�.�\ > c` �• -• • `[ C (aEeEREN. °ELcv=°iol.o•) - ` ; \ Central q• ..x.ac n.•a... ,r.m.w \ ' q 1 :'•\\ / .;`o �''�' 11 C ' • '' '''• •, V; /' O 1 . °� • r ` • 1 `I t F_^. _ Casino TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS \ V;O \ C ' 9 1°w' PLANT LIST \ F s. °o• \ \ oc ; 1pt0.` I \\ =�[, -- his:; • / �` \\ \ r.. 1• �s o •\ / 'Y o •♦Q. y, �, pQ\ ,�1C „1 - ,• �'1. l; O�• L\ • 11% g NC Dl y6�}u.r gyp,e...nwa.".•.�... . "71031'1T'' +�_ ....e e..:,:.a. \ -NI b\\ .1.1.(� \.• �a � RISERS/�?E 0�Fa,*�,.a�,d ,o.yg..n.• 7 c..r.e.e.....•.W... \ ' •1. L0`•\ �`S ` \ • 1 `. .g•. ....owg.•.,. .1.:Re�:a ec or••am. \ \ .'9j�/i �\ \ 1 Q/ •S CAS/NO DRAWING rmE °e•�°.°.lea-. >.a5 .e.e.e.w.a... .:.r ..�... \\ 7% \/ it , r'' • LANDSCAPE ta •..a..MW1aa r•.a...7 o.••. \ .ro..a.aeGao.e.vCent..,..e.y.ar ��o�\\ 1 PLANTING PLAN CI 7..................1.•t.. mCe..+.u. J.•q. 'U ��`it. \ •/ 1 `\ •Ci 0 ueiee•••.am.ee..•Lt...vw •'ro-•.1'es `� o - {`��y''��'��/� y .•q.r.,.c \ �� \ ,.0 q1 4�Y�1� c cum..i� sy+.e Y'K....'Qa :vocO. t o a-.•n.n...M'0•...y o...e.. ... a ti \ DATE 1LY°I.iQ•i1 n M••ge•W°^•Ta•'•'• r•ro••.•'aeM \ .w ....+c. DRAWN°Y IE '/,,..•...ww.»Thb 1...y...1.......... W.•...T et Mvq.W W.e•°....m.a....• 1 e.•eeeo... rl Ma MITT. CHECKED EY •...yam�a....... ,....re..n.. ....Amor.. ✓.....�ec.M W^. w•..w \ \� o.+•... a J'am \ 7. .-Ao,.�.,,,.a..-.a.eww...,l....•p w...ev /t WwwwM•. \ LANDSCAPE I ER�vNA y . 1 A.. 1Yet p.m uln.0..W.. \ \ PLANTING PLAN EIRLICH iJ]h 02.•1 DIAMJTERtea NTE G.q.p..b.. .•pet o•eevw.a..,er yun.. \ O 2.•1,1,rETEN'I.LME'..rt a.Tame M.inane T.. 'sal m.T..A...O..• . DESIGNS • yr..almb e• `\ NOTE@ ....e1.e.. oaytrcves 1' • Y..e1Y.....gW�n.M1ao.e •w.w.,..u..y....g.r....ag......mg e...am.aa........g"acme \ rea TTO J vv...pn• J.• a..,�, DR-L 1.0 .. ) 1............. .. . ...rawwJu.aw.•a,erw.eae..1.ra.wa.T.+..e+Wa.bermb.e.�••.•W.re+oa.ew roro'+T)s.!!t P} .....nw•e.•Mrr...e..a..e.w»y ws•+,w G....c.e...mea.a•y u a....+a+a•r w..e a w v+"•• 0 rTa.0�D.7 T.Ce.....a.111..............e,nnm u•,bmW..e T,w.41..V....i.rs.i••'••y b.•.e w.M vYan 00 m•••r'. \ R1:15 u0 Wa.% • w.pe...pv..Im...m a•.e p.e.•y e.•..tam..a pepm..•wcu.m u ea __ k20tr14-8o`. ' • w...... p.n^B bn.r...w......W.,P.m..•Ppw.a or...N rot,r•.Ow R.+•W..wg r.aJ.4 Wee.w.e.m re*,a*we.ww. • '_ ..; ` . ~. � ': . IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME ISLESS CLEAR THAN q PT �` NOTICE EA ,? N� E^ } . tTHIS EQUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE IT IS DUE TO • . r. irJ E-1 S S S x.e,t:riKcum rx.:mnrr \ (j' /isy,6'�''�'/(4,L, ,4 i1, / \rr. /�riAJrS,t.rLdylturh,l, MERRICK �' it A A A ti A dish t+hy AA,l it • += , ~A,F h,l,Ld•ah,i Alta, ,:•:;u, LENTZ ` //'/��^;Y tY ve,L o,F,+a, h,:+ ,b,h,:,5?i 'CABIN"• \•\� ai 4:..d•o•,,d,LtF,4S t, ,4',Y,y r",F:lr:w -.--,�ab•� ARC jECT aY w•',A d•,L,:,L i.:,.•>ti�:,y rF Il a4.1,w��.,u,u rcuLaYl•ton \ \ /\ L ; .1 hs AA S A A A Ma 4416 AA4,:N1 usratao,n se roam \ .0 Uywr�.u All�ra�K \ A.441:d,JbA.`A4athA6414 r tit dia. . �` \ ` \, \•i A.J•A th dr/II.A 4 tir tS th A i hA Sir rL:F,4 ..- \ \ \ t�4tt•. tt,'.r4aAaAthASr Arl�etit4 =t4SALie\i, SHED I, ;91 \ \ \ ti,AA A::h atA J•,F AS,i to th 46,liAS A A Jr d� -�- r IS ___.-.__ .. \ \ AA t4"6 J•disk AA4rk S A A,t/'A Akj h sh A A A rn,S A,`ni 1 elik A'v it A A A th Stv,k A 4 va,• A A iN�eTii usithr'i iFiA- vSV AA 676.-X ir, �• -.-- r•,'ri"Z,Zp-y,eo!,S�-I��Sn:,a_1S0--. \ �•c,AJ.. a:ihJ:164.4d,:F0A,haylmleA St. •44AAA A . an . Y ,a,, i�j7 iF ,1 .•.••: a•4eh4AAI AA C�F4-t*cad•Aa 1 \ •w AA 'A Ail•S J,,k Ih IL Il tY a 4,l ar,L • ss Ai a. .L 1.}`1A• J\k4 all Li •k A A4A 1A All 5 A�1,ryA A .*IA, 41, :AI 115 ICIPA 1'J,kk•.6slti•s40h h•k d1 ,il` \ \�i Aa'111'0(4 de A A eb A,h A i4 t4 •,h 44 AAJ,4. la a. 4, A l,.,,_,i A h 4 A 14 t'L:a kA A0I.1A ' 1.{ s- si.4A At th A A,h eh!.At A sit S S A A A A a a 1 '1,,• , \ \\ \ \4AS •./i A S di a A Ih A A A A h.:•A • A,D .,H.A S tbJ a,aF 1.L,i rh id•Jr. A,J•:.1,14 a',L 4:4 Yh,11 S 4.A lie 4,4l, a A 4 J A A,4 A A a,t•,k 14 J.A a t4 A A a a \, '+„••�, : i G.WAS \\ \ %a4 J•allih A h S d rF A S X i.S,4. J•, A A w A•6,ti J•,s.1 t4 A.,4 th,L,1,}J.,}:a A•F•}S d r4 tk ri•iv,:,4,`•,L A,h,h a S A it A A d :l.i a k A A e :Y)`•a a S,}A A a a t,ti h 1a1/7n-atn /a1a-n.s I.t•. TES rffDaf +.,� utN V TIE!O.OG \ \ SCALE r.7:�[' \ ' .tCrtN T1'PIGAL LIGHT POLE \\\ \ DRE-1 SCALE. NONE \ \ z . w NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN p'rr T" that{1:4 t4,,,'F.:‘"6.,Z.f,' .7-1.''S-Ey-, -ff- ;,-,11,,,,„,_ 1-.:.; CE IT IS_.DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. - THIS NOTICE .... -. 4S416 • • \ GRAPHIC SCALE `` 0 b I I I ' \' 3 _____ - - r 0:6oD wc•.c.u•.*J.Pc..rtcT I 1 / l IN FEET) -1 1 1 Y 1 --- 1 Inch 00 It \_J 1 101 el r p . " �, 901. , MTENTRRICK . ( ;,; 1+±, ,'!�� "•�\ " 1, ,1 l a ;IIIII;.,i;1,I '. iJLNTZ 1111 1 1 • ;; _ ,/. \�;�,;qq -- I o,l -- ARC ITECT S 1 i 1�� / f�J 1�/ ' C \\�. �T , / /I ` --_-L- 1 I 4++ • ;1111;i 1;;III --- 1` „deco 1 C © , I 19 11 'CABIN' I;iiii+i+l;i , • \ �- I , Qtr c o\p gravel parking/dumping yl_reo` I~ I , 11 J. \\ ` �'i �op ` ` c p\�'\,' �2 `� I I 1� I +iiiiii.tlli;; -1- ,t . i �j/�� 94, - - _,C AP �C�i•,��0�O I^ I I 1 ;`111;•lii+i _. \\ I, -%/f 'JOOG ♦ '..C�' \�\_ \a` SHED tt __ I __-�aJ.;+l;; _ iT� _ ' \ \\ Ott � a•\ C� \♦ 4 CD a�`�.ODAOflQQO.DX(O.bRt[QI +A+Oo oo 01MODOU.C53.'QQ.0)3."A RI`JA•- `?j;lit\+' _, Ingo-Iseu�,.�.nc.State Iro • \ t, '%� ,••� ♦ C` Al , «�It111111111+11 _- .n�iia�if��iixiilrroM I.o ` ••a, \ r ``S♦ a C`� �, i i S/-/O? I,hu,+11„/ e - ew•1:,dare•«ueolla«,. \ , -ctI a t 1 , FF.I7.36• I-T tl+nd tlnl • at�' w�av�aKeu• \ \ = •0•5 ` ``...'• c` \ I '" +I011 I++11 E T s o_ �tJ .y_d LII a++uu1 1 • 1 /' aOF., c` ♦6 / NEW 6'SIGH\OBSCURING FENCE I+1111+;1111 6TA CT•G RAN tt / ` �6[+.�. . C` " -�• r .-+1111+ ++11 -T l '� a, ` \ Vita ``` / •NO PAARINr BEFORE - +11111111++1 l 1 n"`••'=rtn l \/` `mot 1 ! ,I� f '`1 ♦ C ., _t < ,1nJ 01a _ J 0` f �j.? tom+',' // \ 11 AY FOR TRA6 PIMP- 1 +5�� \ `` .. ♦ OAK' 1 ' (¢ •.F ^`_j 111 1111 j...rt Y•••.E+•t C C C to.- .7 C L ..$9`r O 1 A ��-�- \ J \�`,p / FO .11 s)\ O3. � ,..,T;V: D IUIj11P` '^n • `C5- IL 11p 11+ �• �► as are o `\ \ \ ��j, o. I �� , _ Iq1+,t11+ Is; a. : I L. aae.o `` y/ \� - 1 ®mot ,u'„y" FF-17.76• c�.�z�FinEMI +I1u1 1,p1 0/ (: :J,r rr`»'.'.».e r'a'. \ \ •`` \`♦ O.\ , •••4P./' \ tie., v' aj t\,t`11,,,, qi PROJECT NAME -11' J \ \ • I ♦ • FF.17A7\ 41:a�±�.{�Ly0 1+\11t1+11� ••_E � 1!!I•-•m.�' 6.AD5 \ \ • •o'o'. ° �, �, \�` — ;;111yN BIG APPLE "t!I • tIIBII II ill�1111 \\ \ - -� \,"• 111 „ ' \ 1 ` 1�11U1 un :z `'. ,jI-II \ ti ` — ;+1t1t CASINO o.. C I .\ --� 1g11J 1uP -9 11' -�•,1f.1�1•- `` I I �. `) --� 111111 1 1 0 _.'i w.• m.O.,O \ \ o PROPOSED ;;1 TREES "�" \ •\h \ \. C \FF.1tso' �10`;;,+ iUKWILA \ \ :'; BIG APPLE TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS \ \ ''I oa••�. ``C " '\ _ _ �� +1'a,\`;,` VIM... T \ , b\ CAS/NO _ ; \ •\ 'ts ♦FF.17.81' \ • IIII +11 PLANT LIST C •C `, :1111;;1` . . �r=—v.w.g-�to to....paean. ad •.•u \ ,�y4� `JO\, C 'J.� +, 1 - +itid ' t / .//.u. was�.444Mae w..r •••ui e.TIM .a as*a.. ;// �`, -`♦ . _D -t-7,2..4.....1a...,g Awe . 0.0.2.0.ac .Rau do eat Woo,. n�•g\ \\ ``B / cC9\FJ - 1. `J�6., 11 N♦t i • _� .fir'``♦/ 1• \\ ------ Its' I J /ID rw..w.t•sir"..-...'war rul.n.ere.la ea...o-w uteul lea*ANT_r \ 'll f(((J)) �p 100 1 '• •T-'� ' ae or- ��avow* W�tJesttn..v.• \ VA 1 NC !! o ,:.:a a»me.Y. a TV cal .e.ro....we. \ R/VERSIQE I DRAWING TME 7,en .�.r2.W.. :-�L.,RM. ra \ \ LANDSCAPE CAS/NO .Ru.r..,dL.e. \ ,yy', "�a• NG i9�-` PLANTING i \ V \ CI N; I I `I •nba paeme.[ew.Owe+'Raw tew+..w•a r. l `I , 4 FF.10 EA..es..d...e.,Y w•«.•ale-AM \ i I g. I 1 a. .i' ,I \ zs' PLAN V A.eeoto.ee a%fay.n w.c.gwr rial I a Aware utt�.•••s Sae», r•roe.»•.'cc \ \ /',I• i i 1 T I ` \ .•` Y1:f�31 r ,wCene...v W.V.•RY ee \ /� +\S 1 / / I • \ V w C»u.••p.aa'Nw roe-`•.•'ec \ \ // 1 1 ease .C»u a Toaueu'.oew w�.e.• J.y••♦Tea r..ra na ae«w \ ' `-' i I 1 .n•mw GATE DEGGIJBCR IS,20YJ0 ®w IAO.M FINIF cw.wa.)t;no.a aaBu'•4ara \ \ ```` •�/%� `i'>.0•./• }�'' J DRAWN BY ME •o* r•w•w re,_ \ \ �/!h. k•`Di„i /� • .e..•:•enn. CHECKED BY. o C.ea••...e.r.arr�.u�^ayD...... r•.a..♦•'eaM \ \ p- :-t..�I. - ♦ REVISIONS . ro-..`�.r e4-...••V no \ \ , T •INN avoece.e..a.eutIg taeCata...•.rs.,.. • ..�J ea.wRI..wWarr•......co. \ \/ \ FERN6'JA w aa I"Pao Wtla a do \ \\\\\\\\GROMOGOvER y •••� •0..4•ea Pl••••..goo w.1^ \ ` F[E��F�CC�c11��W-�II��1H'c�. .,.e�c...44. I gal ws••as P'....w.,gar v..1 \ `` DESIGNS ...wax war a.»n4.11•0 n o•4K RM. .•Pe♦r•ea PI.'s••444244•PAN." iJO .a.asp»�1.�.al..r.,,.Pl.w1:`�i:.•w.e1 ..np....p......•uP.n..»,.gv....me,ee...«...�g gee..at root ee�.. \ ♦♦ ow.xtr�=� \ re pmp \\ \ ro meat n:Weer L,—I I, obiP•••r naa....0.....e.u..eewu..ce..n..nv..�e»a•why'1:a.�1w..gw...�e...i a�i...Pi:.•�.t E• Dma73 rD.7 R•Vo tea..e.=w..a...wu.a..,aa�•nsa.eau..v.n..wuw...uwn..lscup-urea as.ro cue w•w...e ear. \ \ -,J` T 206-16.-DtCJ• i ...Cae.a..r w.••�ve..e.n.l ge a*0...x p..e»..va w*^*.eel ren.....ar1...a•el woo. o..pa.to ..nu.Aug w. \ \ - I; Fa 2o6-rN-On5 • •.u�pa.bap 1b**0 41•s..e ow.n e.awae.e.a..wo, e...0.*.w•e ran .yiw wee.-....nww.ems pr.p a.w...�wwn rN.M+e R.NP�•Ppw.e plus Ad r fen.um a..•wa w..1.. \ \ ---- \ \ . . . ./ • . • • x a'. u f k. . 1" , i, ' • F•., • `NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN "' -4 i x �v. -, a.,-; ; ICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. r �; ,�' F^ may. THIS NOT • I 43.LN3011WH3d S1N3W1V32J1'2J3ll31 2JOd SNOIidO I j:1 11. 1l.illllilllllfill(1,11yi1:141 lljlllf(1Tfl��ilr� ill llli�llll�11111f1(I(1i� 11111111II11I111111111I.! I1IIIIi1III 111111111( VNIHO t'`e "` :Z HONI9 ':. • 1I .1. IIi 1f111i 4'. , i1; ►1iI'Ii1►1►1is►1 I. iIi1 JiI i'l i:ltl ► _ •99617171, +9DD• NOD' 319VD0N39 0 SDd 1IVN9 • 61750 - 099 -WS XVJ • 66L5- 6Q9 -6175• • 6OLL6 • NO03dO (N39 • CI V021 OfvAvN 1. gf09 • NOS121VD'VlflVd•SNOIS Dd • - •;. >.4.>, ?:,I rt.. i" 'Yr"Pf"B1'T(r rLn. rJ a3 V ItThrird rtnrirr . ionOiddV`pio► U°1' daD DNOD1VNO1IdSD.'bMO uosIJgj•Ihj ;?iau6lsaa V1Ion1;aOj NDIS N011d. NISVD'M1ND GNVdJ: iOJ UO Oauasay '13 9 L 43130 IN011O9 011H93H '13 £Z 1HJI3H 11V2J3A0 001 '13 'CS 1V101 13 •OSZZ „[9X„6£„431„ 13NNVHO NVd N3d0'• l3NVd 4321 ,.ONISVO„ 5210100 X31d /M 13NNVHO NVd” 1V211N30 aNV219„ S213ll31 „ZL„ONISVO„ 13'L9S£L „P3LX,se • MVO „ONISVO lV J1N3O 4NV21J„ uillllll IIIIIIU� iiiljiill u1lj�ii 1:141)1 1011,1 Iill1ilil IIIIICiII 11611111 IIIIlI�II Illl1llll IIII1IIII IIII1IIII IIII1IIII IIII1IIII � � fir.( .. ( ( ( ( 2 3 9 -. lia_iltlili.I�i !IIitII!�li`IIIII�II IIII�IiI�Irlrlli ,1 xoiivnaig (isa) auvxixno3 - d Druarung tu�oipJv3 1IIRJIIUJSJ1I pJAJllO9 SVA SW7 ll ��r■�s mras �■ .� �� ■��r �r ■ , %//111111117r�//11111111�//1 1 111 IIU— %- _ ft MOS II Ilk M � ma Fri; . m �� ■wolf wor sim wwwwwwil igai II monsit wrn c mom srPrMMr,sorl� *n■ —� , a i u 0.111 IIII1i9l lll(IIIf ofllolilt 01:11111111Irl1fllilllllirl 111111.1 1i 111III1IiI1111, 4.110li11,11j1`1011iII111,111 IIiI11IiI{III1IiILIIII11 ICS •. "� i...r�:sidx \. G.. "'). ..,'. .' -i .0 .. .. -i J;f \�.r_.. -1 i.. ``. NIHO � VHONI ° • VIIIIItIIII `VIII.IIIIIILI:L��II�I�II'Ij�J xoiivna-1g (IsiM) !NOM - d omaling m 1llVJllU1S}I pJ1IAJIIIOII sdaA set ne4 eipa Timm mrF ma uza= an two ma etsN am= coa r oenrr..rJae4a •• ram y mum m 1:20 GM= WMEn nmrSE1® © ® ®ra raam 6L= MN cz.n I MI MO Ca m R'E Ci r VI1 VZ I Qm MUM Cq IG715111 am ®CL ICIRI II ICZ r NNI= Kg121017M1===1113213351 au; mruear��r�I ®lay.p1123 . ===I =IR IT f 111-11IT j I IT I 11 mouNATig (Isgmfunos) INioxj g omaimg woo,ipnj 7 Juillulsou pmaillog sdaA srul F;;Tip&mmariiiaLUMCtpdan,(ZW1 NMWEENIMIENNIMINii • 113.1.N30 1.11NISA V127, t, Cs.11:1 V111011-1.1. AO IWO G3A13031:1 • „'1; • „, • , • JWIlILL11IIl1IILbJJiIIIiHi1IiIIIIIIPlIlIhIIiIIIhIIIT1W1IIPIIII1LILLiLLJ11h1iiiLi qtr,„thmagemzur • ttqlowsw EnEas-ormtg -VREMMERMEEINIFITEEMEIMEENZWIEC. 'FA.,M4EEEVITEL.VigEfllggr",ikk-lfk VCIMMEIVAILWAMMEMBIZEKEINERE: 104. • • 996171714-9DD • NOD' 319VDCIN3900d 11V3 • 6.1750-0EE-14.7S 66Li-6-8E4S • 3OLL6 • NO03210 GO • VO 21 0 NAV N 1,6 1.09 • *NOCIND V 111Vd • Stias Dd • 'e•S 96 3eV100d alvnos Id 'OS Z6 •9176 X id 'OS 1.£ „V£1 X :,9L'EE •Id 'OS n .9' LI. X .63 NVO 1V131A1133HS VS t 13A0 G3IlddV SAI3 '3C1V0Vd eNicnna HOlVIN 01 I3A00 310d S3NI1M0113A CINV 'emeni ?J3CI?J09 NO3N „3111NIA .13d S3LAIll N31 NVH1 MON ON IV eNVHO HUM SEW 9 L NVHI 32.101A1 ON SdIW1 NO S 031VIAIINV :0E0906 L# 3C100133Vg 01 CI31 13NNVHD NVd N3d0 :„ONISVO„ S?J31131 „9(£ L „ONISVO„ S30Vd SSV191X31d CI3ddV0-1,112.11 13NNVHONVd :?J1N30 ciNwie„ S3OVA lAInNionv Noisnu1x3 vInNunimv dO C131011211SNO0 NV O ”ONISVOlVaLN30 aNven. • • • • • — 1 IN31qH3%r.L.LV 3dVHS 3NOIS9IA1012.13A0 CI311ddV NOIS3C1 lANIA 1N30111SNV211 • CIIV13A0 /AA SY1e1X31d 03ddV0 -WW1 :311j Nam 1ANIA1N30111SNWIL CIIV1t13A0 IM SVISIX31d111NOV9 :SeN1011119 3dVHS 3NO1S9IA101 pAaddv poipuoi paddy II-14) ip-Juogdomni bma uospop rod r•qaueisaa ziOE NOIS N011d ONISVD 1\1211N3D ONWD ..Joi uopoluasad (iIII�IIII( III(( IIIC�illiji111( Ilifj'11I11ilif�ifiliilll('iill Nili( Yillptyj111 ;1(IIiI1IJII1IIfT1fl(I1IIII 11111. 1111111I1II1 1111111111JJ111(111111II I I '.14 I ill NMOHS 5b' GNO I11f1W 1b'2l93 LN I /M ZIOOQ ) LN3 1V134 VNIH0` HONI 0 1(11111h Lai Ell ® ®KM ® ■®1 MN EOM 1 WM 111 II MIME ■■ 1111'11111111!! .u11111111'1111�� 111111111111® Int ■E NIL ME oo'.o o_oo' :o;o p oo;o;o o:o;o 0 60•0:0 :0 ; 00:.0:0:000 QG 7 lii Q M b7 R7 Q C'd E [3 C3 (' C7 Q 6 Ifl7 El Q ES QNVG 1:3Q SAI3 • 3�INNO� 513 iM NHDVLIN Zl315v1ld 39n1 319NIS - NO3N a3?1 lt 1iflijifif ii11 1331N30 11W1i3d 6002 9 R rEu� viIMHftl AO .A110 03A13031:1 0.£-11(1 me IE .t.inr A9 03NO3HO AS NMVlJO 31V0 SNOIwAa/a DNIc lln 1 3 111 ONIMb210 MOM WONG • VAL `gi 1L ou!SLD muaD pump 31/VN 103f0ad 6PIL'L4L'SZPXdS LLIE'LPL`SZ4 50086 'Sa!qlvM' owta 001 ;WS 'StI weld I 9EI.0081 sa�lzlxaf ZJ1NarI : ,LN311HHHOVJ11Lv O 9NMM 017071.1 10 ./1V.tl411:2.. 00.10 l IOWA AW1ML HULLS MDIVY.1 .0110, Wee/ •WAWA • 1• m W10-1 ri71W1 wok" KC t4211;14 UMW* • 117:■M1 EEO EB QNaDa'I ,1111111111111111111(Iii1IllJii 11.1 fiiir1111111l1,11 10111111 1111C1�1111lllliJ1ii1111JIIr1fllllfl) ill( �1111�11�11I1111�1111�11 _II[II11 IIII1111111111III4 14' 15 VNIH� H3NI C Ii-.l►,II1:1I li +.IIIII.rI �Il11i_l_ �11_CiJl1lllili�i� ,; :L,I :III(I11!1lull�lL1�11.i;ll,li. I•.1'iM aruz aIIoas - WAIL (W .0•■ • •PA .114,9 • aIIf1S0'ION a HSVIII NoLLVAna IS3 n ■ 1111111/•a/ =s•111111=a1 - - - -- -COI 11--1-----1---- -- - -- 11 a1�- - - -a1— - - - - - -I 11 - -1 a191•11119!•r eal--- - --- -- 1m.1IIIII-- -ri ItA1•t♦ - -r - -1 , AIN% CV* "CA !hi 40,1•.an911%1 Lava) - NOLLVA3Za x3VS 3902 9NItTIYa 0NKV0 O A/1 'TIVO9 01011 f1H dOHS NOI,LVAa'Iff 3DVs — ® 11111111 1I1II11I 1111 11• 111 10. • r 1111 1111 1111 Mil 111111 11111. arm ■: y ,..I r I r I: r LL1111S111a11ll1 .1T1111.113IIZ'ISi[3'13] 531-. .O•.I • AA '3 (HDI0N) - NOVA 3QIS WOG AID ® CI3 0 CM CM EM rooa °'KM O .,mr,;' . 11111 "11 1111 1111 NI r- �.ISI1Maw� It I��R•! 1s ■11 11111111 IN aa1�1s q: ' 111"i " Ile a1111"r" 11111 11111111 t\� ee ally 71, 11wsS1 1111/110,.• e1111 1N IAA IN ;.L. �1�"'- 0,1 \� \�`C.e11M11111111� \■ \C\ Atli lel !!l a�II 111 11 • -1 • 4/1 '31•129 caw - NOLLVAWIa ILNO1I3 ( 147 CO ® O DI1 MI ® 14!0114 W ® 1117 =IOW - AA OW1 TOM' O ;3;.y..,,,�.:4' 'F,0, :.rF,, ?,^.'. ' ;:r '' ter.:.` '2T: :.�.a;. 1, r ._ 1r- '.. �:, sw. .,.�.:llfn?._,�. '1.....:i��R . _:.:':.._..�::.C;r�.''` .. �i:l:_,..� �._ �:I_L .. ,....... .. .rr ��elt� Oe 1!iI 1111!H! hI 0 t!llhi!! 1111 1111 1111 !!i! III III 1 J`. 1 iiii " • 1111� iiii �� i� iiii moi an vis V Int INN VIII 1111 MI NO I Wil MI SIN MR 1111�i11. wawa 1. '$:15 L1111111 {:1 wi d11 ®tom ®rp1 ®n MINIM �amlL' 73' 2S$ II lI1IlII. i1: TIL31$ IIISIIS�ILIG11 $IZQZLQ'1'I:j.1.1�; 11 111. 115. 511: 1111:81•.1t1'3711LLIIIa.W +1- 10 m ..' �I. „• ■ ∎ .4 4,40 i,l li :!∎4∎' . 1 411 R]• • • e la' l•I I;t 11111'111111 f!(, 4■“ 4.4Yl'1'1'1 �� ®12 as MANN. II; ®� r� �� as �EN IL; ■ain r0, 00 °`'i • .. Illllli'li llui� 11111 as as ■1■ as 1s as �c� I� WON ill'.` !! ! ®F: �r it r_ a +c' u ..'rO�C ill �mR� a rr �.� rr ®� r r 1_ee ®o �� r0, ®� rla �0�� rr ®�ee� J ilOy �' o� ��1�� soh. I v n l .r �� .r ��Ra 1� saws a e1�X91��1�e��lll�as ®e�NA�l�muiltldon�®e�sese�111 l 7 ramsRtl:R��ss \77,1 l _ - ♦l ;;- ae(�RC. ■ -..... - �-- ..- ,:nuw�m a \ \\ r/ai `\ ' :•U;.:'..^G' ?f1.;•. •�L�••.= .li' ^•ICT...'a -e ;1R.: •'[n .1,.Ynoaw0'a:. V'•..'n... -.a..: leiiehlleni®`1�0 'I�•�� ® 1 a uhlSa/1111 u all �111�1M111Mo oaaVVVIU eaai.nnViR •ala�au�wlas�la•aaa�a ®ei _ - •�0�1�11Yi1� ®1MUUM 31�it` .. J ®�11 MINII Olr+ms O DD O DD ® O O DIIO®O 21411114 1W21071 Q(A 1ry170 GO MI1009.112 WILLOW; W DD O MK NO?l 07111 ® DH 0' EU 011}40(1 .111Y7N M ONO H 4.1516111.10#1.1 •O•,1 • A/I SIV*9 oNIIQ'IIf1H dOHS NOLLVATE aUIS Willi 01100a 92071 •1119017 NM4 MOWN 0011 94•61•0, GAR 104 TMA IO#79 *A.9 O SIIU_- ilN - �'I••OwiI'1uI 100401 01 1 100, J'I 1101 01119.11 10741.6701 I1- 9NIIQAo0 1 211.10019N1KINi- 111172 Ol 91,404111 91,404111 •10119.917 .0.1•.9/ITrro9 JNIIQ'ri is dOHS NOLINATIa INONE ,� ONI01110 NMI WOW of o-7, • l7.NW1 WI7.l2N y, —► O OIMO, 0 0000 o000 0 0000 y i 0 0000 0 01000. ONI01110 NMI WOW of o-7, • l7.NW1 WI7.l2N .1:13INSO 11011:13c1 1C'OZ 9 I Orfcl • V11M)1(1 ld.10 • 03A13031:1 • 14 74, ,2 3 8 t2 13 14 .15 .(9 11$4 ,r• -cr.,1177 , 461-110 ;trett&•■Zifr..% ,•sr low r NO' 'T '2:744i4i4Ali‘ef 1 PIT1.111111111 ."""g 151J'Adarrl 'INEA mai irlra Ae-6.• \ .ilailIONIMINlidirMiall —111110:` °MEW 111) Nir"- " 'Ery 1/1 . ' _ l&-4,701.•■■ • 7. „J,„ '.1121 4, III iguritra lama. , , atqwn t ,s1,14•1(.• at\ AlGal PIIIQW0A ) (74 A ;,;: , 44,4. - _ C (i) 16)1414/ iN trf 0, .• tter • 40 3 IN31411H3V11V ■ " . w/ /Jp No cache 1:31N33 .UVed ZOOZ 0 6 ddV • %maim AO A110 03A1303ki 'lir 1 II frimiltilfIlIrtift1 TM-TIT ItiffiffillifiliTiliI111111f11111111.1111f111.11 II1111:111[111.1111111111111111111141(11I111(1(11117 . " • 8 9 ibYi ' 12 13 14 • •••,: ". 0:. ,.11..r..11; ‘,. uti ON 133HS V10)31EIVDONKIOSal.11W43. 61750-0E-1175. XVI • 66LE-69C-WG. • 6OLL6 • NOD3n ONE • 3W1CO21VA LOL49. a3VOISID (ON ifsii/A .■160}".• 210100 ONV 31ALS NI swine 1-101.V14 01 ON12.13A00 SAI3 1V131N133HS 2.13A00 310d 031 9 x.,t7 NOS N011d UMW AI1V 1101Id ON GOD )