HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L97-0008 - TEUTSCH PARTNERS - GATEWAY BUILDING #10 SHEPARD AMBULANCE DESIGN REVIEWL97 -0008
SHEPARD AMBULANCE
13075 Gateway Dr.
DESIGN REVIEW
S.
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
October 27, 1998
Craig Beaumont
Coffman Engineers
201 W. North River Drive Suite 510
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: Gateway 10 Office Building Transformer Enclosure
Minor Modification to L97 -0008 Design Review
Dear Mr. Beaumont:
This letter is in response to your request for changes to the site of the Gateway 10 Building. A
new, larger electrical transformer is required to accommodate the needs of the Electrio Lightwave
tenant. You have proposed to enclose the new transformer within concrete block walls that will
be painted to match the building. The landscaping plan should also be revised to incorporate
evergreen plant material adjacent to the transformer structure. Overall I find that the proposed
addition has been made in the least obtrusive manner possible by screening the transformer and
designing the walls to be compatible with the building.
The proposed revisions are within the scope of the Planning Commission approval. In context
with the scale of the development this modification will be considered a minor modification to .
the design review approval and therefore approved administratively by this letter. A copy of this
letter and the revised site and building designs will be placed in the design review file, L97 -0008.
It is your responsibility to submit a building permit to cover these changes. If you have any
questions or comments, please call Nora Gierloff at (206) 433 -7141.
Sincerely,
LA--
Steve Lancaster
Director, Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665
...r:. �Y, r...., rt,,... ,.:t tt ?iviX +i:.^�.'n� t\.y:,.,rc.Z.ir•E.ick a', <,ie's� +�r`n`1i%:icA:i� ui« 1; .}.4'+��li7 GYti L'`..s -�� �hk?:4f'4.ViA? +kW z.44sk,,
z
mow:
•
•u.2: •
VO.
i. co 0,
:u) w:.
• Lam!
w 0;
-j, •
J
a:
z�
10
z�.
moCV •
w w.
1---V.
. u- P
;U =!
O
AFOFFMAN
G I N E E R S
October 26, 1998
Ms. Nora Gierloff, Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: Electric Lightwave, Inc. — Tenant Improvement
Gateway Center — Building #10
Dear Ms. Gierloff:
Attached is a copy of the transformer pad revisions required by Seattle City Light, for the
above- referenced tenant improvement, for your review. Mark McMicheal, P.E., from our
office has met with you recently to discuss these additional requirements by the power
company. These are minor revisions to the project, and we have done our best to make
them conform to the zoning guidelines of our site, as well as blend in with the existing
building.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these revisions, and what the
next step will be in allowing the contractor for our project proceed with them. Thank you
for meeting with Mark on short notice, and we look forward to your response.
Very Truly Yours,
Craig eaumont, AIA
Senior Project Manager
201 W. North River Drive Suite 510
Spokane, Washington 99201
509 328 2994 *fax 509 328 I999
www.coffman.com
Seattle, Washington
206 623 0717
Anchorage, Alaska
907 276 6664
Structural
Mechanical
Electrical
Civil
Corrosion
Program and
Construction
Management
• david
e le
V•r7;13:illkall:Lkkg
December 18, 1997
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attn: Ms. Nora Giertoff
Re: Gateway Corporate Center - Building 10
Dear Nora,
RirziCr,-7.A.VED
DEC 1 8 '1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Thank you for the meeting the other day where we discussed the exterior changes to the project
(deleting "eyebrow" canopy) and reasons for the change. At that meeting you indicated that the
changes needed to go back to the DRB since you and Jack were uncomfortable doing an
administrative change. .
As such, I am requesting that you schedule the project for re-review by the Design Review
Board at their earliest convenience. I will provide you with new exterior elevations and the
originally proposed elevations and revised colored sketches next week for disbursement.
Also, thanks for the job site review and I hope it gives you a better feel for the final project. If
you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
David Kehle
DK/mt
cc: John Walker
a:\8704-10Met12-17.doc
12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116
SEATTLE, WA 98168
•
(206) 433-8997
FAX (206) 246-8369
•
.".z
re
•
;-■
;0131
,co w
1 -I
it°
.,
•
=i;
(0D
—
OC
.10
:JO
• Zi
LiJ
:0 h
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director
December 10, 1997
David Kehle
12720 Gateway Drive Suite 116
Seattle, WA 98168
RE: Design Review for Gateway 10
Dear Mr. Kehle,
The drawing you submitted with your letter of 12/4/97 showing proposed changes from
the approved building permit is significantly different from the building design sketches
presented to the Board of Architectural Review at the hearing on March 27th. While
adding the cornice detail and increasing the size of the sill panel are improvements to the
design, the deletion of the projecting canopies and the earlier deletion of the sconces on
the columns changes the appearance of the building. The Board has repeatedly expressed
its wish to review design changes that would' affect the exterior appearance of buildings
that have gone through design review.
Your options are to either continue construction according to the approved plans or
submit a formal building permit revision, I am enclosing a revision form. Once we have
received the revision I will schedule you to go back before the BAR, probably hi March.
If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at 433-7141.
Sincerel
Nora Gierloff
Associate Planner
cc: • Kelcie Peterson, Permit Coordinator
9251egicqf ZtOr le
iqdh
avid
kehle
December 4, 1997
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attn: Ms. Nora Giertoff
Re: Gateway Corporate Center - Building 10
Dear Nora,
E V k`..)
DEC 0 8 1997
CC':IMlMuitiNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Enclosed are the revised elevations for the Gateway 10 /Shepard building for your review and
approval. A couple of small changes have been made which has not impacted the overall
building massing or break up. The following itemizes the changes:
1) East Elevation, North Elevation: Delete the flat canopy projecting out at the entry
points with tie - backs. In reviewing the building in place, the canopies would convey a
retail type image which is not what this building is about. Also, in looking at all the
other Gateway buildings, no canopy like that exists.
To add more detail and further accentuate the entries and the facade steps, the
comice detail at the lower canopy has 3 steps of dryvit and then at the high roof
parapet, a 2 step cornice has been added. By doing the larger cornices, the facade is
being identified as the entry both at the low elevation and high elevation.
3) To add detail at the entry areas, the lower window sill panel and the base of the panel -
legs have been increased in size by adding stucco with a texture finish which is also
accented by paint color 4. This will provide a solid looking column base further
accenting the entry.
12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116
SEATTLE, WA 98168
(206) 433 -8997
FAX A
;.'7i:a'+`v.'�5}.,t'.ur`' :' Av-, Y: rz; icF.,. :,..�+b,:.;�i_.a5.�;.d+txy.af #: +�i���%.vJ �. ye7�'+:. Oka: Y:rZ7�.11. ,.k.cJ3 .t r.+:e7arS'ns.'3i.5Yx�i.,r 5x}. �u-{, iY. u' �r; S. �ti/ A;% LC'..'.-' i ;35ri;Y.�',ti�C1v"L.4i`,r� ^•,3r.
Ms. Nora Giertoff
City of Tukwila
Re: Gateway Building 10
December 4, 1997
Page 2
Please review these revisions and I am sure you will agree that the finished product will be in
keeping with the Board approval and these are minor changes. If you have any questions or
comments please call, and I will be glad to meet with you at the job site to review the actual
setting.
Sincerely,
David Kehle
DK/mt
. Enclosure: A -3 Elevations
cc: John Walker
Bob Hart
a: \8704- 10 \Iet11 -11. doc
::E.t u1'.1.�l��f�;, •.liti `fi: 1r,l' Z::ii:IPA∎1112:Af 1.
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
September 16, 1997
David Kehle
12720 Gateway Drive Suite 1.16
Seattle, WA 98168
RE: Design Review/Building Permit for Gateway 10
Dear Mr. Kehle,
•
Thank you for returning the drawings and sketches. I understand from your note that you
are considering changes to the exterior design of the building. Please submit a revision to
your building permit so that I can see the extent of the proposed changes. Anything
significantly different from the sketches presented to the Board of Architectural Review
will need to go back before the Board.
If you have any additional questions or comments; please call me at 433 -7141.
Sincerely,.
GL
Nora Gierloff
Associate Planner
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
7:2-4,.A2:tvSr s�,M:ne.-4■:.VUA=1.:isi+i ue} :F7.; �u. +va i?Sbst,a ls`;,a;+{i3{`..iia�i uiwia Tn.`�v' �a.°.)ii liii{�ittY� i.rj.3ni} '.0;12.1.j
To:
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
John Walker, Applicant
David Kehle
State Department of Ecology, Shorelands Division
Office of Attorney General
King County Assessor, Accounting Division (HB2567 Sec. 1)
Metro Environmental Planning Division
John Gleason
Z`
a 2
J V',
U0:
usw
w=
fn u-.
wO
a -J`
u.
co
_�'
w
z 1,
This letter serves a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following E- 0`
z�.
u.1 tu
ON.
w.
FILE NUMBERS: L97 -0007 Shoreline Substantial Development �?;
P u.
—p
w .'z
92
ASSOCIATED ,o I-:
PERMITS: L93 -0010 SEPA Checklist
APPLICANT: John Walker, Teutsch Partners
project and permit approvals.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
L97 -0008 Design Review
REQUEST: Design Review is required for this proposal to construct a 60,500 sf
office and warehouse building. A shoreline substantial development
permit is required for building and parking lot construction within 200
feet of the Green River.
LOCATION: 13075 Gateway Drive
SEPA
DETERMINATION: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance issued June 2, 1993
This notice is to confirm the decisions reached by the Board of Architectural Review and
Planning Commission at the March 27th public hearing. The Board/Commission voted to
approve the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and the design of the project based on
the findings, conclusions and conditions in the staff report dated March 20, 1997 and the revision
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
- '4';:fia 3y "L14:ksb: 74'u1WINIM2ntO$ ke."3": ;+ttXiG:'G.tIVO5 MVPS,C4=1 G:r. V Of
:t&r iircrid ,vt - 4Vi:d:'4, lWZI.4 ,iy:O '1,44,4`irks 14,w8
Notice of Decision Page 2
drawings that were presented by the applicant at the hearing. The conditions listed in the staff
report are as follows:
1. The building wall will be redesigned to incorporate significant horizontal modulation,
2. The entry canopies along the east side of the building will be relocated to cover the
doorways,
3. The proportion and design of all of the entry canopies will be refined, and
4. If the building permit application shows that the parapet walls will not completely screen the
mechanical equipment additional screening must be provided.
As additional conditions staff will administratively approve the design of the screening wall,
future tenant signage, and all architectural details not specified on the revision drawings.
Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the
permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development;
6300 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between
8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Nora Gierloff who may be contacted at 431 -3670
for further information.
Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax
purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
The time period for appeals is 21 days starting from the date of this Notice of Decision, March
28, 1997. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit decision is only appealable to the State
Shoreline Hearings Board. The Board of Architectural Review decision is appealable to the
Tukwila City Council. For appeals of the BAR decision materials shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Appeal materials shall contain:
1. The name of the appealing party,
2. The address and phone number of the appealing party, and if the appealing party is a
corporation, association, or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person
authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf, and
3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision.
The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in
the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant and the relief
sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of
Appeal.
APTIVI pOttri1 . 5PA evorttrroslwaT.P,.'IVAI. !18
z .
• 1Z
•
�w
U O;
o •
w W
w o.
gQ •
50.. .
z �.
o.
•zI-
n o!
o •.
•
w w:
• U,
U. F=
O
Z'
U=i.
O•
z
Shore's one Management Act of 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
•File Number: L97 -0007
Status,.: APPROVED
Applied: 02/0'3/1997
Approved: 03/28/1997
Expiration: 03/28/1999
Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to:
to undertake the following development:
NEW 60.500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICEE /WAREHOUSE BUILDING
upon the following property:
Address.: 13075 GATEWAY DR
Parcel No: 000480 -0010
Sec /Twn /Rnge:
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE.GREEN RIVER
AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE
SIGNIFICANCE AND IS .DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT.
The following master program provisions are applicable to this development:
TUt "WILA SHORELINE MASTER
PROGRAM
:Development. pursuant" to th.is permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the
attached` terms and conditions.
This per. °viii t iSH..aranted pur Suant to the ':shoreline Mar7ageMnent Act of 1971 an
noticing i.n this., permit all' ercuse the applicant from compliance with any
other Federal State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations
applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline
Manaaement'`,Act (Chapter 90.58 RC,W) . .
This permit: may be rescinded. pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the
permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof.
CONSTRUCTIONPURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED
.UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58 :140(6) AND WAC 173 -14- 090. OR UNTIL ALL
REVIEW PROCEEDING'S INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF
SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c).
Date :..,MI \a(o ZU ■c6l
Steve Lancaster
Director, Planning Department
Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within
two Years from date of issuance, per WAC 173 -14 -060.
1
HEARING DATE:
NOTIFICATION:
FILE NUMBERS:
ASSOCIATED
PERMITS:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
LOT SIZE:
STAFF REPORT
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Prepared March 20, 1997
March 27, 1997
Notice of Application mailed to Surrounding Properties and
posted on Site February 24, 1997
Notice of Public Hearing mailed to Surrounding Properties and
posted on Site March 14, 1997
L97 -0007 Shoreline Substantial Development
L97 -0008 Design Review
L93 -0010 SEPA Checklist
John Walker, Teutsch Partners
Design Review is required for this proposal to construct a
60,500 sf office and warehouse building. A shoreline
substantial development permit is required for building and
parking lot construction within 200 feet of the Green River.
13075 Gateway Drive
4.05 Acres
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial /Light Industrial
ZONING DISTRICT: . Commercial /Light Industrial
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance issued
June 2, 1993
ii e:tt. ✓ t..o-ii „ti
:Ya: #1 v C. ii,fr i ∎S.EL,r::ti} ai_ =:LU[f
0*
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions
STAFF: Nora Gierloff
ATTACHMENTS: A. Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance
B. Previous BAR Approved Building Design
C. Shoreline Permit Application •
D. Design Review Application
E. Applicant's Response to Design Review Criteria
F. Set of Building Plans
G. Colored Elevation
Page 2
•
Staff Report to the Planning Commission /BAR Page 3
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
FINDINGS
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
A. Project Description.
The applicant is requesting Board of Architectural Review approval of the
proposed design for a two story office and warehouse building, pursuant to TMC
18.60. Under the proposal a 60,500 square foot building and 275 parking spaces
would be constructed on a vacant site adjacent to the Boeing Employees Credit
Union. A similar project was approved by the BAR in 1993, for that design see
Attachment B.
The applicant is also requesting approval of a shoreline substantial development
permit, which is required because a portion of the building and parking lot will be
within 200 feet of the mean high water mark of the Green River.
B. Existing Development.
The site is now vacant.
C. Surrounding Land Use.
The Boeing Employee Credit Union is directly to the north of the site, the Green
River is directly to the east, a truck terminal is directly south, and the Gateway 9
Building is to the west.
D. Topography.
The site is generally flat.
E. Vegetation.
Vegetation on the site consists of blackberries, shrubs, and grass none of which
will be retained.
F. Access.
Access to the site is from a new street along the west edge of the site to be
dedicated to the City. The City is planning to construct an extension of Gateway
Drive along the north edge of the site which would connect to a new bridge
crossing the Green River. A sidewalk easement along the north edge of the site
would be improved at the time of road construction, but no vehicular access
between the site and the new road section is planned.
BACKGROUND
A similar project on this site in 1993 completed SEPA environmental review, was
issued a shoreline permit and received design review approval. The
z
,= H
mow;
QQ 2
J V
U0
CO
' cnw
=
Ili 0.
g�
= d:
III
Z
H 0;
Z
al
U Ci CO
ip
=0
4
- z.
U
O
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Page 4
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
environmental review is still valid, but the shoreline permit has expired and the
building design has changed significantly and requires review by the BAR. Due
to the changes required by ESHB 1724 the project's shoreline substantial
development permit, a Type 2 decision, has been consolidated with the design
review application, a Type 4 decision, and both decisions will be made by the
Planning Commission/BAR.
Approval of both of these applications must occur before a building permit is
issued, therefore the body of the report has been separated into two parts. Part 1
contains the shoreline permit decision criteria and staff's discussion. Part 2
contains the design review decision criteria and staff's discussion.
PART 1: SHORELINE PERMIT DECISION CRITERIA
The project must comply with the policies contained in Tukwila's SMP and
Comprehensive Plan and the regulations in the Shoreline Overlay in order to be
granted a shoreline substantial development permit. See Attachment C for the
permit application materials.
TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES
The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program. The
policies of the SMP are categorized into the following elements:
A. The Economic Development Element requires that development be
economically advantageous to the community, maximize use of the shoreline
and consider the visual impact of the development on the surrounding area.
B. The Public Access Element requires that the development provide for public
access to the shoreline and develop or enhance the trail system.
C. The Circulation Element requires that roads and transportation facilities be
designed in a way that provides for pedestrian access and recreational
activities.
D. The Recreational Element requires that recreational opportunities along the
river should be preserved and enhanced.
E. The Shoreline Use Element requires that uses along the shoreline should be
appropriate, protect and enhance the river, be water dependent or
compatible with water dependent uses, and allow for multiple uses.
F. The Conservation Element requires that the river be buffered from the
effects of development, where feasible facilities for intensive recreational
activities should be provided, and scenic views should be protected.
G. The Historical /Cultural Element requires areas having historical, cultural,
educational, or scientific value be protected, restored, and made accessible
to the public.
.W ✓. Y• YMC.. f• Atewro]xwM?NMAtror1P/.'170"rvAOWlM rAr4:'Mt?...
z
w
c4 2
- U•
00'
W�
w i.
J F-:
CO L
W 0.
J •
u. _•
W d.
= W
I- O
Z it
2 D.
H.
W liJ.
u.0:
wz
U N.
O
z
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
Page 5
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE POLICIES
The policies of the Comprehensive Plan that affect shoreline development are
found in the Shoreline Element.
z
Shoreline Element = H:
F- W
ug
J U.
0
` W w:
:J F"
u_,
- Capital improvement projects and private development should not endanger w O;
public health, safety, welfare, or the capacity of the river to provide long- g E
term community benefits u.
- Over -water structures or reinforcement of the riverbank allowed only when it w'.
provides long -term public benefit or is essential to a water - dependent use Z
I— O
Z H.
W;
UU
!O U,
0 H':
= U:,
I-
O.
iti Z
H =`
F
The Shoreline Overlay is a district which extends 200 feet landward from the z
mean high water mark of the Green River, throughout Tukwila. The district is
divided into three management environments with specific regulations.
River Environment - the first 40 feet landward of the mean high water
mark. This is the most restrictive environment and only allows for
limited public access, transportation and utility uses and structures.
Low Impact Environment - the next 60 feet landward of the River
Environment. This environment allows structures up to 35 feet,
landscaped and screened parking lots, transportation and utility uses
and structures.
High Impact Environment - the next 100 feet landward of the Low
' Impact Environment. This environment allows all uses permitted in
the underlying zoning district
- Development should minimize impacts on important habitat features, protect
and restore degraded riverbanks, and mitigate unavoidable disturbance of
vegetation and habitat
- Development should minimize water pollution, provide erosion control, and
protect water quality
- Development should reflect the river's role in Tukwila history, protect the
long -term public use of the river, and reflect community traditions
- Development should include high - quality site planning, architecture,
landscaping, provide for open space, and provide a trail for public access
along the river (for areas included in Green River Trail Plan)
- Development should maintain views of the water, encourage water enjoyment
uses, provide for multiple uses, and encourage efficient use of land
SHORELINE OVERLAY
Response: This project will develop a vacant site for an economically productive
use. Public access to the shoreline will be enhanced by the new sidewalk, public
plaza and landscaping. Design review should ensure that the project is
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
Page 6
aesthetically pleasing. No damage to the river environment should result from
this development because the first 40 feet from the River is already developed as a
City trail and is outside of the scope of this project. An oil /water separator will
treat stormwater prior to release into the river. The building is pulled away from
the shoreline, so views should not be adversely affected. The uses proposed for
the Low Impact Environment are landscaping and a landscaped parking lot both
of which meet the Shoreline Overlay regulations.
z
uY W
2
J U'
0
w O
cow'.
W ='
PART 2: BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN DECISION CRITERIA 'J ~
W O:
This project is subject to BAR design approval as required under TMC 18.60.030 g
due to its location in the C /LI zone and size. In the following discussion, the g
Board of Architectural Review criteria per Section 18.60.050 of the Zoning Code N
is shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. For the design review w`
application see Attachment D, for the applicant's response to the criteria see z x'
Attachment E. z 0.
DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES 2 ji
U 0:
1. Relationship of Structure to Site. o Sil_';
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with W W
streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian v!
ILL I—;
movement. O.
Z
U N'
Z'
O~
z
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas;
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the
site.
Response: The project will provide landscaping similar to the existing pattern and
match up to adjacent developments. A new street will be constructed along the
west edge of the property to allow access to the site. One sidewalk will be
installed for the length of the street and another will provide a pedestrian link
from the street to the building and across to the river trail. The loading bays,
truck wash and garbage area will be screened from both streets and the River.
Landscaping will be provided around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the
building. The building is lower in height than is allowed by the zone and the scale
is reduced by the horizontal banding of the design.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area.
A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged;
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided;
kLt -
sr+moumYttY4
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
Page 7
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established
neighborhood character;
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged;
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should
be encouraged.
Response: Landscaping that matches the existing pattern will be provided along
the north and west sides of the site. The landscaping along the south edge of the
site provides a buffer to screen the parking lot from the Green River Trail. One
driveway that serves the site is planned to match up with the existing driveway to
the Gateway 9 building. The location of the truck bays in an internal courtyard
minimizes conflicts with cars and pedestrians and partially screens the industrial
functions from the surrounding office uses.
z
Z
J0
00
co
W
W ='
H
CO LL:
w 0'
g Q
d.
= w`
z�
I- 0.
3. Landscape and Site Treatment. w w,
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a j p
development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. ;8 to
• B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should w
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; v,
PC. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen z
vistas and important axis, and provide shade; U y;
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or o �--
motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken;
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in
paved areas is encouraged;
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly,
should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination;
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as
fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used;
I-I. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the
adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design
and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should
be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant
colors should be avoided.
Response: Sidewalks will connect the building entrances to the street and trail.
The site will be landscaped on all four sides to a higher standard than required by
the zoning code. Landscape islands have been used throughout the parking area
to provide additional planting area.
.7?'kf°i MA TAvoAla n ehol tr4 4 .5- orttlytOnumprhrvOlta,++4!�tr N.IIw+a rwv,,: s: ,,.0 xeYtn.,„,v ��a, Kwer ,«.ena.ntit*+mmVett.14411,10 orvri..,34o.em1100,Tyomplftnki
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
Page 8
A screen wall and landscaping is used to conceal the loading area and garbage
dumpsters from the trail and adjacent streets. Pole and building mounted fixtures
are provided around the building and parking lot for safety lighting. No off -
premise glare or light in excess of 2 foot - candles is expected based on the lighting
diagram provided by the applicant.
4. Building Design.
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based
on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings;
B Buildings should be appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent
neighboring developments.
C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should
have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of
the structure;
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for
accent;
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view;
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures,
standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building
design;
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual
interest.
Response: The current proposal is a significant change from the previously
approved design, see Attachment B. The most important changes are the
elimination of the 3 foot recess of the ground floor, reduction in emphasis of the
entry canopies, and elimination of the cutout corner detail.
The proposed building is similar in scale and mass to the other office /warehouse
structures in the Gateway complex. The primary architectural expression of the
building remains a series of horizontal bands. This appearance is given by ribbon
windows and a color scheme of three shades of gray (see Attachment G), though
the building wall is essentially flat in the current design. Five entry canopies
project out from the building to mark the multiple tenant spaces.
The applicant states that roof -top mechanical equipment will be screened by the
parapet walls but specific equipment locations have not been given.
z
w
R•
U.
U
Ill i.
10 IL.
w O:
LL.a
Nd
=w
i- • _:
z �.
1— O.
Z
0 0.
0 F-
Lu
H
F'
•
-
O.
•
.z
z
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
Page 9
S. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture.
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part
of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be
compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in
harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to
scale;
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture
should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
Response: New pole and bollard light fixtures will be installed on the site.
Benches and tables will be provided at the pedestrian plaza. Design standards for
the signage have been proposed, but the actual names and locations of the tenant
signs will be determined when the space is leased.
CONCLUSIONS
PART 1: SHORELINE PERMIT
The project complies with the policies in the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program
and Comprehensive Plan and the regulations in the Shoreline Overlay. The project
as proposed will allow for economic development with a land use that is
consistent with the existing pattern in the vicinity. Because the limits of the.
project are landward of the Green River trail it will not interfere with existing
recreational use of the trail. It will also provide an enhanced landscape buffer
between the trail and the parking area. The project as a whole will not have a
negative effect on the wildlife habitat, public access or water quality of the
shoreline so it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan shoreline policies. The
parking lot proposed within the Low Impact management environment is allowed
by the Shoreline Overlay regulations.
PART 2: DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
1. Relationship of Structure to Site
Traffic and pedestrian access and circulation work well. Enhanced pedestrian
access from the street to the building and the Green River Trail is provided by a
new sidewalk. The site is designed to minimize the conflicts between the truck
service and loading area and office tenants. The size of the proposed building is
in proportion to the size of the site.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
The proposed landscaping will provide an attractive transition to the surrounding
properties and the trail. The screen wall and plantings will adequately conceal the
ra)
Staff Report to the Planning Commission /BAR Page 10
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
loading areas from other buildings, the trail and adjacent streets. The building's
height and site coverage is consistent with surrounding development patterns.
3. Landscape and Site Treatment
The proposed landscape plan provides an attractive streetscape and entryway to
the site as well as screening the parking lot from the trail and softening the edges
of the building. The lighting plan will enhance the safety of the site and design of
the building without creating unnecessary brightness off -site.
4. Building Design
The architectural theme of the building, a horizontal banding of color and
materials, has been retained from the 1993 design. However, the building is 34
feet high (36 in places), the walls are essentially flat and the color and material
changes are not sufficiently pronounced to provide the intended effect. A greater
degree of horizontal modulation (recessing a floor or providing deeper window
insets) such as was provided in the 1993 design would provide more interest and
break up the tall, flat building walls.
The entry canopies are awkwardly proportioned and their placement is not
coordinated with the bay system of the building. On the east side of the building
there are entries without canopies and canopies without entries. Refining the
placement and design of the canopies to provide greater detail and interest would
improve the quality of the building. The 1993 design used corner cutouts to echo
the canopy design and carry the design theme evenly around the building, an
element which has been eliminated from the current design.
If the building permit application shows that the parapet walls will be insufficient
to screen the mechanical equipment additional screening will be required.
5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture
The new light fixtures are simple and attractive and will add to the safety of the
site. The building facades have a well designed space for signage and the letter
size and color is in keeping with the design of the building.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONDITIONS
PART 1: SHORELINE PERMIT
Staff recommends approval of the permit.
z
JU
U O'
N
W w>
• w z:
•
w O;
w
CO
—a:
• x_: •
Z
1- O
Z
ui
U wt.
iO
= w:
1- rzi
LL: O:
W Zi
1=-1'Y I
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR
Design Review /Shoreline Substantial Development
Page 11
PART 2: BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN
Staff recommends approval of the project with the following conditions:
1. The building wall will be redesigned to incorporate significant horizontal
modulation,
2. The entry canopies along the east side of the building will be relocated to
cover the doorways,
3. The proportion and design of all of the entry canopies will be refined, and
4. If the building permit application shows that the parapet walls will not
completely screen the mechanical equipment additional screening must be
provided.
04
david ke
March 27, 1997
NOTES REGARDING SHEPARD CHANGES:
1. Owner wants to be compatible, yet have his own identity.
2. Similarities/Constants
a) Tilt -up concrete with colonnade look.
b) Recessed first floor windows.
c) Landscape berming to panels and landscape species.
d) Fenestration pattems similar upper floor.
e) Window systems (bright aluminum) is same - using lighter glass (grey tint not
greylight 14).
f) Color banding at dryvit fascia/soffit.
3. Unique Modifications
a) Entry definitions which did not occur on most other Gateway buildings.
b) Refinement of design at entry (lower canopy protrusion, 3 bay colonnade, double
doors centered with skylights and transom to match, comice detailing, color).
c) Color scheme to accent entry points /panels and provide for "modulation" of facade
through color. Not the traditional horizontal banding, and colors of lighter hues
from the grey tones. A blending of BECU brown to Gateway grey.
Comer shape no longer 45° nor stepped but providing accent to comers via entry design
and color.
RECEIVED
MAR 2 7 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433 -8997
SEATTLE, WA 98168
FAX (206) 246 -8369
JU
c� 0',
i CO
N W
W =,
co LL.
Q
w
z
• o'
z
i0 D-1
� • o
i0 H'
'W W`
kehle �
January 31, 1997
Revised March 10, 1997
City of Tukwila
Board of Architectural Review
Project Goals and Objectives
Re: Shepard Ambulance
Gateway Corporate Center
Building 10
The project consists of doing the final development piece in the Gateway Corporate Center.
The site design reflects considerations for a new north /south road connecting Gateway Drive to
48th Avenue South, of which improvements will be done along the property frontage. In
addition, a future street crossing the Duwamish is being planned by the city along our sites
northern boundary. Access will not be anticipated from the street as it will probably start its
elevation to a bridge across the Duwamish along our site. The Duwamish River is to the east
and a truck terminal is to the south. The anticipated building uses will be similar to the recently
completed Building 9. This is a multiple tenanted building with a common dock area. The
building has been oriented to front on the two road frontages and the Duwamish and has a
concealed loading area intemal to itself screened from the west street and oriented away from
direct public view. Parking surrounds the building providing a less intensive impact than a major
parking lot and allows for multiple entries to the building.
The building design reflects the surrounding Gateway Corporate Center design of tilt -up
concrete, glazing is recessed at entries and slightly pulled back from the building face on the
other areas. Multiple tenants are anticipated and the design has emphasized 3 entry nodules.
The nodules provide a covered entry while also providing facade modulation along the north
face and the east and west corner elements. These single story canopied nodules bring a
sense of scale to the entries, provide for signage and accent to the building.
Access for pedestrian traffic is provided with a sidewalk linkage from Gateway Drive, along the
new street and then passing in front of the new building and providing access to the Public
Plaza and the river front trail system.
Pedestrian access along the north property line via a future sidewalk. This linkage will access
directly to the river trail. Dumpsters including recycling dumpsters are planned along the
building loading area. Circulation to the site will occur from the new north /south street and the
entries line up with the previous developed Building 9 entries.
12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116
SEATTLE, WA 98168
(206) 433 -8997
FAX (206) 246 -8369
7. "il: ^.'. Gfit :,`..t: "1• ° -'4, 7:ii': . ,i :'. a?tLe eN ik' dt r `.G'(?'w"�v'i,.`'`'.dion:.Maaii All Yrsteastu.- alFhl' .i•- IT2T.6'ltc' ,Y1i!i
City of Tukwila
Board of Architectural Review
Project Goals & Objectives
Page 2
The building itself carries on the use of materials and colors and architectural style which
Gateway Corporate Center is known for. Landscaping in excess of code minimums with a tie
into the trail frontage improvements will continue the already established planting styles and
mixes and will provide the final touches to the park. The building facades reflect the structural
grid being utilized and columnade look adds texture and rhythm to the building. The first floor
entry areas are recessed 3' to further reinforce the columnade look and provides additional
architectural relief. Glazing at first floor and second floor will be set back approximately 7" from
the building facade providing a "recessed" look and accenting the "columns" at the panels. The
fenestration, both upper and lower will be a lighter grey glass and aluminum frames which
provides a nice contrast in color. The building color scheme will match the 3 color building
schemes in the rest of the park. Additional building excitement is being created in the corners
where the canopy is open above and provides an interesting positioning of the trees and greatly
modulates the facade. The east and west comers and north facade have entry elements which
provide not only a horizontal modulation but a vertical modulation as well. Horizontal modulation
will be created via the color banding and horizontal reveals.
The recessed first floor and building bulkhead also enables the landscaping to be bermed up
onto a concrete bulkhead. This provides greater vertical relief to the building.
A public amenity is being proposed at the juncture of the site pedestrian linkage and the trial
improvements. Benches, tables, textured concrete patterning, pick up the linkage design at the
drive lane crossings and low light bollards will provide night time security.
The building, site, access and amenities being provided all fit very well into the Gateway
Corporate master plan. This is the logical conclusion of the improvements and is very much in
keeping with the Gateway Corporate goals and the goals of the City of Tukwila.
Sincerely,
David Kehle
DK/mt
1
z;
w
6
J V;.
U0
w 111
w 0.
f=
---w;
z�<
Z i-`
2
0 �..
to
0H.
V
IL I-
. �t
0.
Z
PPR
david
kehle
January 31, 1997
City of Tukwila
Board of Architectural Review
Project Goals and Objectives
Re: Shepard Ambulance
Gateway Corporate Center
Building 10
The project consists of doing the final development piece in the Gateway Corporate Center.
The site design reflects considerations for a new north /south road connecting Gateway Drive to
48th Avenue South, of which improvements will be done along the property frontage. In
addition, a future street crossing the Duwamish is being planned by the city along our sites
northern boundary. Access will not be anticipated from the street as it will probably start its
elevation to a bridge across the Duwamish along our site. The Duwamish River is to the east a
truck terminal is to the south. The anticipated building uses will be similar to the recently
completed Building 9. This is a multiple tenanted building with a common dock area. The
building has been oriented to front on the two road frontages and the Duwamish and has a
concealed loading area intemal to itself screened from the west street and oriented away from
direct public view. Parking surrounds the building providing a less intensive impact than a major
parking lot and allows for multiple entries to the building.
The building design reflects the surrounding Gateway Corporate Center design of tilt -up
concrete, glazing with a slight recess at the first floor. Multiple tenants are anticipated and the
design has emphasized 3 entry nodules. The nodules provide a covered entry while also
providing facade modulation along the north face and the east and west comer elements.
These single story canopied nodules bring a sense of scale to the entries, provide for signage
and accent to the building.
Access for pedestrian traffic is provided with a sidewalk Linkage from Gateway Drive, along the
new street and then passing in front of the new building and then providing access to the Public
Plaza and the river front trail system.
Pedestrian access is also being provided via a cinder path along the north property line where a
future sidewalk will occur. This linkage will access directly to the river trail. Dumpsters including
recycling dumpsters are planned along the building loading area. Circulation will occur from the
new north /south street and the entries line up with the previous developed Building 9 entries.
• 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116
SEATTLE, WA 98168
r -: �Y/•'' r., i.'. 4:` .:5:: ".��,,4,.�vo.,i, ",'•"I'::i a.� . %x"i;•iis;.u' ^k�"¢,"I'Fet�.'
ECENED
FEB 0 3 gg 1997
f20 eV 311`�iENT
FAX 20' �i 8'�
r` Ali £dlhF"i &fiixstmm 'mg.4,ci,R7Ki
City of Tukwila
Board of Architectural Review
Project Goals & Objectives
Page 2
The building itself carries on the use of materials and colors and architectural style which
Gateway Corporate Center is known for. Landscaping in excess of code minimums with a tie
into the trail frontage improvements will continue the already established planting styles and
mixes and will provide the final touches to the park. The building facades reflect the structural
grid being utilized and columnade look adds texture and rhythm to the building. The first floor
entry areas are recessed 3' to further reinforce the columnade look and provides additional
architectural relief. The fenestration, both upper and lower will be a lighter grey glass and
aluminum frames which provides a nice contrast in color. The building color scheme will match
the 3 color building schemes in the rest of the park. Additional building excitement is being
created in the comers where the canopy is open above and provides an interesting positioning
of the trees and greatly modulates the facade. The east and west comers and north facade
have entry elements which provide not only a horizontal modulation but a vertical modulation as
well.
The recessed first floor also enables the landscaping to be bermed up onto a concrete
bulkhead. This provides greater vertical relief to the building.
A public amenity is being proposed at the juncture of the site pedestrian linkage and the trial
improvements. Benches, tables, textured concrete patterning, pick up the linkage design at the
drive lane crossings and low light bollards will provide night time security.
The building, site, access and amenities being provided all fit very well into the Gateway
Corporate master plan. This is the logical conclusion of the improvements and is very much in
keeping with the Gateway Corporate goals and the goals of the City of Tukwila.
Sincerely,
David Kehle
DK/mt
mow,.
QQ 2;
WV.
0
N 0
w;
• w=.
w 0;.
g
zd
Ti
z f..;
0
z �.
U 0
Ni
i0
w W'.
H V�
•
Z'
N�
U -?
z
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PROJECT INFORMATION
John Walker of Teutsch Partners has filed application for development of a 60,500
square foot office and warehouse building located at 13075 Gateway Drive in the
Gateway Corporate Center.
Permits applied for include:
• Design Review Approval
• Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Other known required permits include:
Land Altering Permit
Building Permit
FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLICREVIEW
The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request
them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located
at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100.
Project Files include: L97 -0007 Shoreline Permit
L97 -0008 Design Review
L93 -0010 SEPA Checklist
'OPP:ORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC.COMMENT .
You are invited to comment on the project at the public hearing before the Board of
Architectural Review, scheduled for March 27, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be
held in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. The hearing is subject to change. You
may confirm the time and date by calling Nora Gierloff at the Department of Community
Development at 433 -7141.
For further information on this proposal, contact Nora Gierloff at 433 -7141 or visit our
offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
5:00 p.m.
Application Filed: February 3, 1997
Notice of Completeness Issued: February 13, 1997
Notice of Application Issued: February 24, 1997
Notice of Hearing Issued: March 14, 1997
{'•y�:v`y`w+i+Pt'wli;`!FN �"'C ^'dAi' °,Yliiiii4�Li
'iamb,; +%?"."'gi";4t" a'igaii -VehlfgalY` W0.401:$7W VTO' 1.tra g . ilg40. ..} 14a e� titii " "`F FlfwnL
z
z:
ce w.
Uo
CO °
W
J 1
CO LL:
w0
u. Q
a.
F- _:
Z �.
Z OI-.
N;
• 1-`.
ww
H • U
o.
Cu.
z`
U co
_,
z
:°cation of.installation Same Address as Above
1z(check;one) Another Location Described. Below
ifire by, testify that the sign installed ;fully complies with the large s(gn layout specifications arf
tallation, standards of Directots;Rule 54 88, that the sign contains the text specified at applicatto
lake and that the s(gn will be maintained until the Master Use ;Permit�is approved for Issuance,t
Signa ure Telephone U,
THE:REOUIRED''COMMENT. PERIOD .WILL: BEGIN WHEN THE LARGE SIGN INSTALLATION cERI1RCATiON HAS BEEN RECEIVED: BY 1HE`;
DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND LAND USE AND IS PUSLISHEDASA NOTICE OFAPPLICATION .'THE DATE OFPUBUCATION WILL BEGIN':
THECOIJ ENTPERIOD FAILiIRETOPOSTALARGESIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD INATIMELY MANNER MAYCAUSEADELAYINAPPUCATION'
�unse�K:: Ammer -7445'M
;�
.r-i+= Ji'�`� zta ,f>" ?-fir "AW+: i.
1= Z+ wi
J 0
0: 0;
CO w
w =;
w o;.
g
J.
LL at
co D!
-± w-
Z�;.
1— 0
Z
w
w
Do
Off
0 [- :: :
w —�
w
V,
(L. H-,
0:
ti.i Z
Tn
0H'.
z
•
MOP
1
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING
OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS)
State of Washington
County of King
City of Tukwila
I 3mhY\ VI/al keR (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal
Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice
of Completeness.
I certify that on 2.24.1"7 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Secti n 18.104.110
and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 13 0 ) 5 Gaffe u .Li D R. V,
so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for
application file number L Gl 1– 00 0-1 (Xi a. L9-7-000 8
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this
i
iant (Applicant Signature)
RECENEED
FEB 2 G 1997
day of /-eJS` , 19
� r\ n
Qa°91, .c
COMM LIN! : y
DEVELOPMENT
NOTARY PUBLIC in and (for ,Ehe State of Washington
residing at 5471e
My commission expires on z�f ' 9-9
tsar+-5trefmcrawm;nre immsa4Mxda.,L•
'! iL-{H''✓.:. i' iw'' r" E. Lh".' lu°:# 4iauti, `r�icZ?�Ja'h'.47%i>.4"'2 <<.6i:,
A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N
6\11-V 1 A Aitc-AAW--1-CA hereby declare that:
fl Notice of Public Hearing O Determination of Non-
significance
O Notice of Public Meeting fl Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
fl Board of Adjustment Agenda O Determination of Significance
Packet and Scoping Notice
Board of Appeals Agenda 0 Notice of Action
Packet
Planning Commission Agenda E Official Notice
Packet
O Short Subdivision Agenda D Other
Packet
Notice of Application for L Other
Shoreline Man,�gement Permit
ANA BoMaD O P'�L' N 9 ' • REM
0 Shoreline Management Permit
was mailed to each of the following addresses on 2 - 2-1 -9`1
c 11-kF A sITAC1-i
Name of Project '1-1EFP42b ApADALANC -- Signature
File Number L 1 I`Dooi
L-a - Ooo 6
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
John Walker, Teutsch Partners has filed application for development of a 60,500 square foot Tight
industrial building with 275 parking spaces on property located in the Gateway Business Park (13075
Gateway Drive.
Permits applied for include:
• Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
• Board of Architectural Review Approval
Other known required permits include:
Tukwila Land Altering Permit
Tukwila Building Permit
Studies required with the applications include:
• SEPA checklist from previous determination (L93 -0010) with update to traffic impact
analysis.
FILES :AVAILABLEFORPU.BLIC:REVIEWW:.
The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the
counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter
Boulevard #100.
Project Files include:
• #L97 -0007 (Shoreline Permit)
• #L97 -0008 (Board of Architcutral Review)
• #L93 -0010 (SEPA)
OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Your written comments on the project are requested. In order to be included in the Planning
Commission packet, they must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later
than 5:00 P.M., Wednesday, March 19, 1997.
Opportunity for oral comment will be provided at the Planning Commission /Board of Architectural
Review public hearing on the request, which will be conducted on Thurdsay, March 27, 1997 at 7:00
P.M.. The hearing will be located in the City of Tukwila Council Chambers, at City Hall. The address
is 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila.
You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling
DCD at 431 -3670.
The Shoreline Substantial Development decision is appealable to the State Shorelines Hearings
Board. The Board of Architectural Review decision is appealable to the Tukwila City Council.
For further information on this proposal, contact John Jimerson at 431 -3663 or visit our offices at
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Application Filed: February 3, 1997
Notice of Completeness Issued: February 13, 1997
Notice of Application Issued: February 24, 1997
z
Z
C4 1112
Jo
00
cn w
Wz
J H
wo
u_a
I- Lux
z�
Zoo
uj
0
O N'.
o I-
ww
LI O
ui z
U �-_
O
z
r ),C ),C iG 3. 1,1/4 ),1 ).1 311,1 ),C �t )t J..,C 1,1 )1 3,4 1,1 1t 1, 1,1 . ),t J� J( ] 111 1,1. JG �t !( )� :,( 1.1 )C 3.1/4 1�. Jl it: J4 1.1 )C 31. 31 ),1 11 1111 1,( >,1 1. /l '!t 31 3,1 Jt ,1 J1 J,t 3,1 3,1 J1 r�..',t r� 3,1 ),1 3,1 P, ,a 3.1 3,13;1 1,G 3,1 )1 ).0 1, .•t )
BATCH NUMBER:
CUSTOMER NAME
EW COMMEN 1 .)
SGA CORP
000300-0046-03
WILSON DONALD
13001 48TH S
SEATTLE WA
000300-0116-08
LEVINE WILLARD, TRUSTEE
39 CATSPAY CAPE
CORONADO CA
000480-0015 -02
WOCAC GATEWAY.L L C
111 W ST JOHN ST V1010
SAN JOSE CA
333277
98168
059999
92118
649999
95113
271600- 0040-03
GATEWAY CORPORATE PROPERTIE649999
111 W ST JOHN ST V1010
SAN JOSE CA 95113
271600- 0060-08
GATEWAY.CORPO(RATE PROPERTIE649999
111 W ST.JOHN ST V1010
SAN JOSE CA 95113
000300 - 0109 -07
LEVINE WILLARD, TRUSTEE 059999
39 CATSPAY CAPE
CORONADO CA 92118
J.J. J.J.J.J(.
000480-0013-04
YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC 609999
10990 ROE AVE
OVERLAND PARK KS 66211
271600 - 0010 -09
GATEWAY CORPORATE PROPERTIE649999
111 W ST.JOHN ST V1010
SAN JOSE CA 95113
271600- 0050-00
GATEWAY. CORPORATE PROPERTIE649999
111 W ST JOHN ST V1010
SAN JOSE CA • 95113
271600 - 0075 -01
BOEING EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNI190124
PO BOX 97050
SEATTLE WA
98124
z
_ �'
w'
U;
U O`
CO 0
w =.
Jam'
CO LL
w O.
g -J
a'
z l-;
f- O
Z
Q
0 co
0 I--
Lu
I U;
WZ
N:
Z
The Boeing Company - Bldg. 4
P.O. Box 24346 MS 7R -34
Seattle WA 98124 -0346
Olympic Hot Tub Company
12818 Gateway Drive
Seattle WA 98168-
The Mead Corporation
13035 Gateway Drive, Suite 119
Seattle WA 98168-
United Parcel Service
13035 Gateway Drive, Suite 149
Seattle WA 98168-
he Boeing Company - Bldg. 4
P. . S 7R -34
Seattle WA 9812
'c Hot Tub Company
a Drive
Th i ead Corporation
13035. eway Drive, Suite 119
Seattle WA
Unite. ' arcel Service
13035 Ga ay Drive, Suite 149
Seattle WA 9
Sisters of Providence
12828 Gateway Drive
Seattle WA 98168-
State of Washington
12806 Gateway Drive
Seattle WA 98168-
Otis Elevator Company
13035 Gateway Drive, Suite 157
Seattle. WA 98168-
ters of Providence
128 . - way Drive
Seattle WA
State . ashington
12806 Ga Drive
Seattle WA 98
Otis Ele Company
13035 Gate rive, Suite 157
Seattle WA 9816
Kamino International' Transport, Inc.
12822 Gateway Drive
Seattle WA 98168-
Option Care
13035 Gateway Drive, Suite 131
Seattle WA 98168-
Kamm ernational Transport, Inc.
12822 Gate ive
Seattle WA 98168-
Optio
13035 Gate
Seattle WA 9816
rive, Suite 131
Z
F- Z
Wes;
JU...
UO:
(00 ..
WW
• J F!.
W 0;
g
• 52 = 0
•?
•
I— O
Z H+
�W W; Cir
. U
W W'
41.15f
U . •
0
Z
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION
February 13, 1997
John Walker
Teutsch Partners
2001 Western Avenue #330
Seattle, WA 98121
RE: Shepard Ambulance/ Gateway Bldg. #10
L97 -0007 (Shoreline Permit)
L974O008f(Design aReview) '
Dear Mr. Walker:
Your applications for design review and shoreline permit for the above referenced project
have been found to be complete on February 13, 1997. The project has been assigned
to me and tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning
Commission /Board of Architectural Review on March 27, 1997.
The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site no later than February 24,
1997. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If
you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of
Community Development (DCD). Enclosed is the correct detail for the sign. It may
vary from the detail that was provided with the application.
You need to obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. It
will be available in the will call box at the DCD Permit Counter. Please call me at least 24
hours before you post so that I may finalize the notice with the correct date. After
installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of
Posting to the our office.
This determination of complete application is made for the purpose of meeting state
mandated requirements for permit streamlining. We may request additional information if
it determined to be necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements
of the City or to complete the review process.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
,z
6
JU
00
co
co 0,
J H
N
w
u a
D:
N
=W:
z�
I- 0'
zI-
0�
;= U'.
o
z:
U N,
I I:
.0
z
Notice of Complete Application
Page 2
This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your
responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by the City and other
agencies.
Don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions in this matter.
Sincerely,
ohn .P erson
Ass a ciate Planner
encl. Sign Detail
cc: David Kehle, David Kehle Architects
Bob Hart, SGA Corporation
.- .c.,..,..».. .w..•+d �'••� ��::1•�• �:i':!; Faso:::: ict' �t3iiV:: Gi: G: i= Sarii 'Wt.onYS.�,:sL,a9.6:i.:'�:.:
•
F- uJ
2
a�
J ,
U O;
• cn w;
•
•
• w,
J i
w�.
LL Q'
F- w,
•
I- 0
.•..w
U
•
: iO Ni
•
• 1-'
'w
w;. •
u. O
• tll'.
U N =:
z .. •
1
A F F I D A V I T
O F D I S T R I B U T I O N
_-r-, _ __ _L hereby declare that:
L Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting.
LI Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
LI Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
OPlanning Commission Agenda
Packet
fl Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
fl Notice•of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit
fl Shoreline Management Permit
Li Determination of Non -
significance
fl Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
ODetermination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
LI Notice of Action
Official Notice
Other 71„
Other
r
was mailed to each of the following addresses on -98
Name of Project �,�� ;ri1,1 . 1-)()
File Number 1-91-0002
J.,c3 -Gob
2 3 ,
Signature
z
U O'
i moo;
cn w •
CO
w =,
`w O.
J.
u- Q
ct
•
w;
Z�
Z O',.
D o'
{off':
'0 I-; ,w w,
0:•
O F" •
Z.
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
To: John Walker, Applicant
David Kehle
King County Assessor, Accounting Division
This letter serves a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following
project and permit approvals.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
FILE NUMBER: L97 -0008 Design Review
ASSOCIATED FILES: L93 -0010 Environmental Review
L97 -0007 Shoreline Substantial Development
APPLICANT: John Walker, Teutsch Partners
REQUEST:
Design review approval for this 60,500 square foot office and
warehouse building was granted by the BAR on March 27, 1997. It
was not built in accordance with the approved design so it was
returned to the BAR for review.
LOCATION: 13075 Gateway Drive
SEPA
DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance issued June 2, 1993
This notice is to confirm the decision reached by the Planning Commission at the February 19th
public hearing. The Commission voted to approve the design of the building as built without the
entry canopies and wall sconces shown on the original approved drawings.
Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the
permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development;
6300 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between
8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Nora Gierloff who may be contacted at 431 -3670
for further information.
6300 So,'thrpnter Rnuleward Suite #100 o Tukwila. Washln.tnn 9RI8R (2061471-7670 o F��.,.• i?n(`t1 I ±31 -3666*
�y;.:::r,i.- .:i.;n:�rotcn+i'r': �i:oi'!�ri;�� Jwi: H` i•^ KrrvT . ;±Yy,�3'iv''°'an'tr�'fiCF�'
Notice of Decision
b441)
Page 2
Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax
purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
The time period for appeals is 21 days starting from the date of this Notice of Decision, February
20, 1998. The Planning Commission decision is appealable to the Tukwila City Council.
Appeal materials shall contain:
1. The name of the appealing party,
2. The address and phone number of the appealing party, and if the appealing party is a
corporation, association, or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person
authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf, and
3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision.
The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in
the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant and the relief
sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of
Appeal.
The public notice sign must be removed from the site by the applicant after the appeal period has
expired, unless an appeal is filed with the City.
•
TEUTSCH PARTNERS
2001 Western Avenue Suite 330 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 728 -1130 FAX (206) 728-0935
February 18, 1998
HAND DELIVERED
Nora Giertoff
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
DE
RE: 13075 Gateway Drive
Dear Nora:
We are very disappointed to read your conclusion presented in your staff
report, dated February 9 for the following reasons.
'
<
1 <z 9 ..
1. We have expended a significant amount of time, money and effort to
develop a building that at a minimum meets, and we believe exceeds, your
design criteria. For illustration purposes, here are excerpts from the design
guidelines as included in your staff report.
4.A. "....evaluation of a project should be based on quality and its
relationship to its surroundings ".
4.B. "Buildings should be approximate scale and in harmony to its
surroundings ".
4.G. "...Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide
visual interest ".
As evident on the attached photo comparisons, our project as constructed,
meets or exceeds all three of these guidelines. Our project meets or exceeds
the quality of the adjacent buildings, is of the same approximate scale and
massing, and our project uses a variety of detail, materials, colors, and
modulation in excess of the adjacent buildings.
2. The implemented modifications were design refinements that were
proposed by the project design team to enhance the project and to address
concerns we received from tenants and the leasing community. Both
tenants and real estate brokers believed that the canopies created to much
of a "retail" image, which is not desired by the office /warehouse users this
project is intended for. Additionally, the project design team concluded
that the canopy feature was not in keeping with existing development in
Gateway.
ENT
Nora Giertoff
February 18, 1998
Page 2 of 2
3. It is hard to believe that the intent of the design review process is to inhibit
and restrict the design team from incorporating design refinements and
ideas that they believe will enhance the project. We submitted our BAR
application at the schematic /development stage- -the drawings were not
yet competed to the construction document level. The designer cannot
always anticipate exactly what the final product will be- -that is what the
design refinement process is for - -what may have looked good on paper in
the schematic design stage may not necessarily be the best solution as the
building is refined and actually comes out of the ground. The design
review process should not restrict the project design team from
implementing a better solution, correcting a problem, or incorporating
input from the end users /tenants of the project.
In summary, we have expended a significant amount of time, money, and
effort to develop a project that we believe is a step up from the existing
development in gateway, meets or exceeds your established design criteria,
and is a great addition to the neighborhood and the community of Tukwila.
Sincerely,
ohn Walker
enc.
cc: David Kehle Architect, sent by fax
•. r. . , • • ,.•. "L ^aJiT '.Y_ i:7?„A0 -L• i.'��"i'isace�.rcv ?i -:b 3�:t -i�L" tY +}L'. :`4w
idi? ,441 iry^
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
HEARING DATE:
NOTIFICATION:
FILE NUMBERS:
ASSOCIATED
PERMITS:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
John W. Rants, Mayor
STAFF REPORT
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
LOCATION:
LOT SIZE:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
ZONING DISTRICT:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
Prepared February 9, 1998
February 19, 1998
Steve Lancaster, Director
Notice of Public Hearing published on February 6, 1998 and
mailed to surrounding properties on February 9, 1998
L97 -0007 Shoreline Substantial Development
L97 -0008 Design Review
L93 -0010 SEPA Checklist
John Walker, Teutsch Partners
Design Review approval for this 60,500 sf office and warehouse
building was granted by the BAR on March 27, 1997. It was
not built in accordance with the approved design so it is being
returned to the BAR for review. The BAR could approve the
building as currently built or require that some or all of the
changed areas be rebuilt to match the approved design.
13075 Gateway Drive
4.05 Acres
Commercial/Light Industrial
Commercial/Light Industrial
Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance issued
June 2, 1993
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
FX1"ai VVIAIIM okras"rkrVAtISMIS CVZIN? krr s ad�r N
_co a
�w
z g.
w;
2
cri
� o
w:
Lie
o f-',
1
f
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: Require that the entryways be built as approved by the BAR
STAFF:
ATTACHMENTS:
Nora Gierloff
A. Letter from Architect describing design changes
B. BAR Approved Entryway Sketches
C. Revised Entryway Sketch
D. Revised Building Elevations
{ <�;: .'�..'r: t.-i �i� „^.:i':tY.m!R"r 470 ":re ",VZiCiii:ii!'".:.".aieaz:: a zxn:'^+Er.:wa,rc
(4")
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Page 3
FINDINGS
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
A. Project Description.
The applicant received Board of Architectural Review approval for a two story,
60,500 square foot building, and 275 parking spaces to be constructed on a vacant
site in the Gateway Corporate Center last March after presenting sketches of a
revised design the night of the hearing. The building has since been constructed
with several changes from the approved design, some minor and some significant.
B. Existing Development.
The building has been constructed. Some of the landscaping and trail work was
bonded and is not yet complete.
C. Surrounding Land Use.
The Boeing Employee Credit Union is directly to the north of the site, the Green
River is directly to the east, a truck terminal is directly south, and the Gateway 9
Building is to the west.
D. Topography.
The site is generally flat.
E. Vegetation.
Vegetation on the site consists of blackberries, shrubs, and grass none of which
has been retained.
F. Access.
Access to the site is from a new street along the west edge of the site dedicated to
the City. The City is planning to construct an extension of Gateway Drive along
the north edge of the site which would connect to a new bridge crossing the Green
River. A sidewalk easement along the north edge of the site would be improved
at the time of road construction, but no vehicular access between the site and the
new road section is planned.
BACKGROUND
The applicant received Board of Architectural Review approval for a two story
office and warehouse building in the Gateway Corporate Center last March after
presenting sketches of a revised design the night of the hearing, see Attachment B.
Staff was directed to work with the applicant to administratively approve the
details of the design. A building permit was issued that reflected the sketches
presented to the BAR.
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Page 4
The building as constructed has several changes from the approved design, some
minor and some significant, see Attachment A. The DCD Director has
determined that the project must return to the Board for review of the changes,
under TMC 18.60.030 C. Following is a discussion of the BAR review criteria
that are relevant to the changes.
BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN DECISION CRITERIA
This project was subject to BAR design approval as required under TMC
18.60.030 due to its location in the C/LI zone and size. The Board of
Architectural Review criteria per Section 18.60.050 of the Zoning Code are
shown below in bold, followed by staffs comments.
DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES
1. Relationship of Structure to Site.
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with
streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian
movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to
moderate the visual impact of large paved areas;
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the
site.
Response: The landscaping, new street, sidewalk and screening remain as
approved by the BAR.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area.
A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged;
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided;
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established
neighborhood character;
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading
facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be
encouraged;
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should
be encouraged.
Response: No site changes are proposed.
hr! V,.3:s o:YiYUYM,4.fy.MMti'Si tIni'iiA4ifLYY lSs���' YF:➢
z
� z.
IX
J U,
U O;
i CO CI
N Wr
w z;
•
JF
N LL:
W O.
1a
1
cf
F- _:
I- 0:
'Z F-.
:2
w
43 I-
w!.
IlJ
U
O
Z .
4
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Page 5
3. Landscape and Site Treatment.
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a
development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should
promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance;
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen
vistas and important axis, and provide shade;
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or
motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken;
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in
paved areas is encouraged;
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly,
should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination;
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as
fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used;
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the
adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design
and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should
be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant
colors should be avoided.
Response: No site changes are proposed.
4. Building Design.
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based
on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings;
B Buildings should be appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent
neighboring developments.
C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should
have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building
components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of
the structure;
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for
accent;
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or
buildings should be screened from view;
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures,
standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building
design;
3 r, . °! :r•;•r,.':'ii, •tom "q�i::Ss? Ss iu�5itS',.iln ± =fY1 o^?.vmemstaaer'm aca ssws6maal.cs
z
o: w
>
6
J U;
UO.
co o'
w=
w 0.
u_¢
= a.
• w
1-
Z
La
U �
'O
CI I-1
;w ui
HU
— O.
w
Z
U '
H 1-
O
Z
Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Page 6
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be
avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual
interest.
Response: The current proposal has significant changes from the previously
approved design, see Attachments B and C. The most important changes are the
elimination of the projecting canopies over the entryways and the wall sconces on
either side of the entryways. Other changes include building up the size of the
cornices, sill panels and column bases with additional dryvit.
S. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture.
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part
of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be
compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in
harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to
scale;
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture
should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
Response: No changes are proposed for the light fixtures, signage or pedestrian
plaza.
CONCLUSIONS
4. Building Design
The sketches presented to the BAR at the last hearing focused on the entryways as
a key design element and the proposal to eliminate the canopies and sconces
significantly changes the appearance of the building from what was approved.
Those two elements should be added to the building. The other changes that have
been made, increasing the size of the cornices, sill panels and column bases, are
positive design changes and should be retained.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the entry canopies and sconces be installed on the building
per the BAR approved design. Staff recommends that the BAR approve the
changes to the cornice, sill panels, and column bases.
z
_ 1-
J0
00:
N 0.
w:
WI.
J f..
CO
uW O
d
Z
Z0
0
O to
0 1-
' W'
w
= V.,
U. I-
O
z
CITY O: - TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670
DESIGN
REVIEW
(P -DR)
APPLICATION
FOR. STAFF USE ONLY
Receipt Num
File'Num
ProjectFile #. ;
53: "Application ;Complete
SEPA'Fide.;a
Application, Incomplete':(Date
horellne File
1. PROJECT BACKGROUND
A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Shepard Ambulance /Gateway Corporate Center Bldg. 10
B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision; or tax
lot number, access street, and nearest intersection; if proposal applies to several properties, list the streets bounding the area.)
1475 Gateway Drive
Quarter: Section: Township:
Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement)
C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent)
NAME: Mr. John Walker c/o Teutsch Partners
ADDRESS: 2001 Western Avenue
PHONE:
Suite 330 Seattle, Washington 98121
SIGNATURE:
DATE: 1/31/97
David Kehle For John Walker
RECEIVED
FEB U 3 1991
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
02/0397 14:08 FAX 818 637 7771
02/03/97 10:00 FAX 20F'448 7342
,r
O'CONNOR GRP LA Z002/002._
KMS TUKWILA 4b002/002
D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION
The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge:
• I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application.
All statements contained In the application are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
1
The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent,
I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed
may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e,g., final building permit
approval) will be Incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the
property prior to issuance of any construction permits.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United
States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct.
EXECUTED at 4 / dQ. ' (city), 6,1! l rte/ (state), on
1.0 nay c3,2 , 1ga..
(Print Name)
9/ , L3rc /vv k
(Address)
D /ado/6 M9/
RECEIVED
FEB 0 3 1997
CJMi1 UNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures.
'.d '"w,"i'S9EMSifi Mi1R3!..' .'A WAthY7'rI %t`iwox7i "F'toit S114.5
z
W.
0!2
U
00
CD
w I.
J H
W O'
S.1-) a:
�_
Z �.
1- 0
Z
Do
O N
,o.
O I-
-.
W W
u' O'
W Z
U W.
-
z~
DESIGN REVIEW
II. DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES From Zoning Code
A. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE:
See attached project narrative: The building is setback from street frontages and
the river zone (even located outside of 60' low impact zone) providing a more open
feeling and view vistas across the site. Parking surrounds the building with service
loading being shielded from the river by the building wing and a screen wall along
the new side street. Building height is lower than allowed by code and is broken up
by banding, facade break -up and fenestration. Pedestrian linkage occurs along
north property line and along building front sidewalk connecting the trail to public
streets. Landscaping is generous and enhances existing Gateway Corporate Park
standards.
B. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE & SITE
See attached project narrative: The building scale, materials, masses and design
lines match and compliment the adjacent Building 9 construction immediately west.
Landscaping is matching the balance of the Corporate Park and additional planting
and screening occurs along the projects south property line (truck terminal).
Sidewalk pedestrian access is along sidewalks adjacent to the building with
crosswalks at traffic circulation and a cinder patch is adjacent to our north property
line. Loading is screened by the building and yet is safely and efficiently used for
occasional dock high access . Primary loading is on- grade.
C. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
See attached project narrative. The landscape design is in keeping with the
surrounding Corporate Park theme. Usage of grass berms, trees and building
berming are in keeping with the overall park. The trail landscaped areas will be in
,keeping.with the Parks. Dept improvements and will be adjusted as necessary.
Site lighting will be pole standards with "shoe box style" fixtures of direct cutoff type
luminaries. Low bollard lighting at the public plaza will provide accent and security
lighting.
Dumpsters are screened via concrete walls and landscaping. The service area is
screened via the building.
D. BUILDING DESIGN
See attached project narrative. Facadale modulation, comer accent treatments,
building fenestration and the expression of structure via the colomnade look, all
accent the building design while carrying on the previously designed elements
which are common in the Gateway Corporate Park.
E. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES & STREET FURNITURE
A Public Plaza is proposed at the juncture of the on site pedestrian linkage and the
river trail. Providing patterned concrete for textural relief and providing benches
and tables, it will provide an attractive area for building tenants as well as a respite
spot for trail users.
4':g4 `... 0- 41+*kt3. ws,.taKi «Yit? .a....in'4,4=ystee NG '.. •:g e
7a
z
.a F;.
~ w.
00
Ww
J H.
o.
2
J
L ?.
v
sW
z�
Z o;
ILI 'Li
U
N:
.w uj .
Ill z,
0 1;
0
z
DESIGN REVIEW
III. DESIGN REVIEW POLICIES: Based on Comprehensive Plan
A. ALL COMMERCIAL AREAS: (See project narrative)
This project's design is compatible with and matches the existing Gateway
Corporate Center design (see Design Review Guidelines A, B, C, D & E). The
pedestrian linkage pattern provides safe access from public streets to the public trail
and the site is well lighted utilizing "direct cut off' type fixtures to limit light overspray
and glare. Landscaping matches the Corporate Park standards and landscaping
adjacent to the trail is in keeping with Parks Dept. requests. Adequate parking is
provided around the entire site which allows for less concentrated asphalt areas.
B, C, D & E: Do Not Apply.
F /H. GENERAL TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (Interurban Avenue)
Even though the development isn't directly fronting Interurban Avenue South, the
development is in keeping with the Gateway Corporate Center which fronts along
Interurban. Parking areas have landscaping, trash and recycling screened and
provided for, pedestrian links to public rights -of -way and public trial are
incorporated.
7b
sS�.rr:7�i4i;vt.
rite:kY'iti�.`:f:s'J, . +i«;v;rdd,+.''= ;.h'Zr' �ir�,*{ist FrT3: %, +:%is:?t�;iuvt.%re��i;•.3:�`ov "deli?Lieru;'S.,:44,..J %z Ckkle
mow`
6
2,.
U0:
U U
W
JH
N.LL`
wo.
tea'
J;
=a
F- uJ
O
z F-
LIJ
UC
0 N
uj
H
_z •
—._;
0 1—
z
CITY O ' TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670
DESIGN
REVIEW
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing
by the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel certain
items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is
determined to be complete.
The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However,
they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency
with development standards.
Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials
APPLICATION FORMS:
Q Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application
Design Review Application (4 copies)
• Design Review Fee ($900)
SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies)*
❑ SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325)
❑ Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) & Fee (if within Shoreline Overlay
PLANS,Q,weive(6) copies of the following]:
cat Vicinity map showing location of the site.
Zr Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's
(41....
at 431.-367e 0 C V E
FEB 03 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
District)
property lines.
loo Site plan at 1 "= 30' or 1" = 20', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of
the architect. The following information must be contained on the plan (details may be included on
additional drawing sheets):
O Property lines and dimensions, lot size(s), and names of adjacent roads
O Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with setbacks
O Location of driveways, parking, loading, and outdoor service areas, with . parking calculations
and location and type of dumpster/recycling area screening
O Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas
O Location and type of site furniture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of
any proposed public outdoor art . .
O Location of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open • space provided for
employees or the public; existing and proposed open space. easements. and
dedications (if any)
O Location and classification of any watercourses or wetlands, and 200' limit of
Shoreline Overlay District
O Existing and proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at, least 5 feet beyond the site's
boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20%
DESREV.DOC 12/12/96
z
F.. w.
JU:
U O.
CO 0
cnw
W=
J
w • 0
L a'.
co
=
W
z �.
�o
z-
2• o
U
io N.
D I—.
w w
H U.
tL ~O
LI. Z.
U co,
z
1
4
O Location of closest sting fire hydrant; location and size of`'' lity lines; location and
size of utilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications
O Description of water and sewer availability from provider of utility (note which utility
district or City)
O Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences.
greLandscape/planting plan at the same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and
date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be
contained on the plan:
O Property lines and names of adjacent roads
O Location of the following: proposed structure(s), vehicle and pedestrian circulation
areas, dumpster /recycling area, site furniture, any proposed public outdoor art
O Existing trees over 4" in diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved
Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing.
z
,w
re J U:
00
No.
J j-
Building elevations of all building facades at a scale of 1/8" = 1' or 1/4" = 1', with graphic scale w o
and date. Each sheet shall have the license stamp of the architect. Include on the elevations: 2
O Dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements, with notations of g a'
materials to be used co D
CO Location and type of exterior building lighting I- _
O Location of mechanical units and proposed screening where necessary. z f-;
In Signage per Sign Code. -' z o
I� One (1) high quality 8 1/2" x 11" reduction of each of above plans. If the project undergoes
Do
significant changes, and additional set of reductions may be required. :o =`
❑ Colors and materials sample board showing colors and materials to be used on all building _ u.
exteriors. • 7,
— o.
wz
U =:
oI
APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA:
Written response to the Zoning Code Design Review Guidelines and Comprehensive Plan Design
Review Policies (see attached Design Review Application).
❑ OTHER MATERIALS:
Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate,
such as color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to
be considered, eight (8) copies of each must be submitted (except models). Color drawings or
photos may be submitted as 8.5 x 11 -inch color photocopies.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Pr King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the
ubject property.
tlO Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within
500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. apartments,
condos, trailer parks- -must be included.) See Attachment A. •
❑ A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining
that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B.
DESREV.DOC 12/12/96
z
. • • ' • • , • . .
MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L97-0007 AND L97-0008 BASED UPON STAFF'S
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, WITH THE ADDITIONAL
RECOMMENDATIONS OF PROVIDING THE SIDEWALK LINK ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE AND IT TO BE BASED ON THE DRAWINGS
THAT WERE SUBMILEED THIS EVENING, WITH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW FOR
FINAL APPROVAL. ALSO TO INCLUDE STAFF REVIEW OF THE SCREENING
WALL DESIGN SO IT COMPLIMENTS THE BUILDING DESIGN AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF SIGNS TO MEET THE SIGN CODE.
MS. STETSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
MR LIVERMORE ADDED THAT THE COMMISSION WAS IN AGREEMENT THAT
THE UPDATED DRAWINGS COMPLY WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
THE MOTION WAS PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
lit ill! tija s
pp:f
D
0
0
Ei
rim
Lb -L2�c
C- 'Z31(Laj, - Ll`kAli L -nA-1 A d o 4-A a 0c1
1 1 1 1 E
NO1ON It$YM'3111Y3S
S AV NYON16111M 1t1ZI
)3911 4310
tip A
:\
ZEE0•CC11lOM
NOlDNIHSVM 'V1IMNll
3Af1lO AVMaIVD
3ONV1flf]fhV OHVd3HS :uOA
OL# JNlallfl9 03SOdOdd
ts
FE
• E • S
9N
- 7//7 /1/
/7'
b1Alb NBI
OVOH SS333V VIIMNf11 40 .LL13
z
z HZ
ag 8 w�.
W o -J
0
to 0
z
1F13M131..V3 S3LLllllfl ONV )I1VM3OIS .Ll
ow no
AMC '1•d O3YOd0Ud
. s .. s /11111•11R
VA1iAING AY
N0LLVDNll a 1=?Y14.4M
•M
UV
U
n ri
.A
�- "ML'.
De Mt .44
11.1
OY ,
w M
M11&1 :Of 14.10N 0
0-41. ri
n.• r(N
„„. *
*0..710 M
M
D
0
0
Ei
rim
Lb -L2�c
C- 'Z31(Laj, - Ll`kAli L -nA-1 A d o 4-A a 0c1
1 1 1 1 E
NO1ON It$YM'3111Y3S
S AV NYON16111M 1t1ZI
)3911 4310
tip A
:\
ZEE0•CC11lOM
NOlDNIHSVM 'V1IMNll
3Af1lO AVMaIVD
3ONV1flf]fhV OHVd3HS :uOA
OL# JNlallfl9 03SOdOdd
ts
FE
• E • S
9N
- 7//7 /1/
/7'
b1Alb NBI
OVOH SS333V VIIMNf11 40 .LL13
z
z HZ
ag 8 w�.
W o -J
0
to 0
z
1F13M131..V3 S3LLllllfl ONV )I1VM3OIS .Ll
ow no
AMC '1•d O3YOd0Ud
. s .. s /11111•11R
VA1iAING AY
N0LLVDNll a 1=?Y14.4M
•M
UV
U
n ri
Tr �a
L - 2
cv13 (c)g. --7-1/1-e'1_1:0311-itaA-471 0 CI zW0c1
1L'
ammo
-7111A1J1--
11
105
INIVIRI
111•••••
13YMa
1011.01ECIO
•
MVO
•
1.0NIRSVPA 111.I.V3S
3AY NVBWI31M ilL9L1
611C9-9st 039 3,40.4dexv
IM
L-CTI, (90Z
Err
HAMM AVIAMLVD
(121V(331-16
831N33 SIVZ:10a103 AVM31110
1LAPRIDiilf1T: ID lc f:1•1! DI= t:
EMIL
:M1111111111•11111
11111
!ilia
MI MI
IND
1171111111111■21=11111
IIIIN
l'ilf
._,. 1
1.
IIIIIIIE
•=1.. tIllidA
IIT11......
NEM'
alaiiiIIMLEI
Mr111111
MINIM
..... Nig
. .
l
II l
......
1111
.
=.....=,
Irr
I
......=.
ill
.............
••III• I
..............
511
0
PROPOSED BUILDING #10
GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER
SHEPARD AMBULANCE
GATEWAY DRIVE
TUKWIT LA. WASHINGTON
R,oNE (200) 433 -0997
FAx 200 246 -0209
Sri
OCKAIPPON
DRAM,' trr
11.••r
DAM
CKOUD
12076 INTERURBAN AVE.
KC SEATTLE. WASHINGTON
b D 0 P 14- �c)-I-ftE.cTfrk. ._. 1 V)
-27- °l'1
E1C I-k15ZT
PANG
arz
7. :'.� 4,4 i::.fi5A':�,xt.
;sxr's 2�isR`: w,u`c:∎q(ii':210
ya; y.*und;Vt` rJdr, e1 A 0±,,. xKJytrvar, 4,4r' zsiv» ss.a#:+v' :,'tim 41,. .414�w���aa3�#��esLtt�;fafNZ4i
Z
Z •
b.. 2;
L
0 O',
CO ILL
N 0
UJ Z
W O:
g -'
LL Q'
°
I—_,
Z �.
1- 0.
Z
w
U
0 H`:
lIJW'
LI O.
Z.
tll
Ham,
O
Z
File:
L97-0008
35rnrn Drawing#
•.5r..n.�tii'�7..;r<
1 6 1 1 6
NO1ONNISYM71i1V S
SAYNYBN6131N111121
1661. 6[61102
AI
NOIDNIHSVM 'VIIM)1111
3AP1G AVM3.V0
H31N30 31VHOdHOO AVM31V0
04# DN1011(18 03SOdOlid
...,.,,• 2^:,..r.ob�ees, xfrF.2F:P.+trx?.1�1��'tceX[ ?�J'IYJ. iten:4.WEIT: ?i5^Gi'4010` % 4 ': 41;44, "1h-;
64 -1. ,,
O'V`'
'-6':,'11
11 ...c
M11AT 1N 1'v'4n4
11.A1•21
01-
1,1L5
1 6 1 1 6
NO1ONNISYM71i1V S
SAYNYBN6131N111121
1661. 6[61102
AI
NOIDNIHSVM 'VIIM)1111
3AP1G AVM3.V0
H31N30 31VHOdHOO AVM31V0
04# DN1011(18 03SOdOlid
...,.,,• 2^:,..r.ob�ees, xfrF.2F:P.+trx?.1�1��'tceX[ ?�J'IYJ. iten:4.WEIT: ?i5^Gi'4010` % 4 ': 41;44, "1h-;
1 1 1 1 6
NO1010NSVM31LLVlS
S AVNV91f11]1N I1I
[661.6651101
NOIDNIHSVM 'V1 A)I(11
3ARi0 AVM3IVD
33NV1(19V1V OHVd3HS HOd
Ol# DN101It18 03SOdO!!d
ii ?'%#isS:3ih'4.F..N�� ' {': tzK�i( iv' ti5 '.ila+`._L`+:�:i= `...,a41cao? 'e'i'>ik"'au'i "' �'.%S =_s n "'
z
o: w .
aa
JU
UO.
C-3.
J 2
N u-
a w O.
a
J
U_
a.
I— w
Z
I— O
Z I—
w
• w.
U U.
O N:
O I-.
wuj
I— U
▪ O.
llwz
U =.
O I—:
'.:
M1037 ']
1N40,6
q6-41.11
01. IeIA y
.s.
1 1 1 1 6
NO1010NSVM31LLVlS
S AVNV91f11]1N I1I
[661.6651101
NOIDNIHSVM 'V1 A)I(11
3ARi0 AVM3IVD
33NV1(19V1V OHVd3HS HOd
Ol# DN101It18 03SOdO!!d
ii ?'%#isS:3ih'4.F..N�� ' {': tzK�i( iv' ti5 '.ila+`._L`+:�:i= `...,a41cao? 'e'i'>ik"'au'i "' �'.%S =_s n "'
z
o: w .
aa
JU
UO.
C-3.
J 2
N u-
a w O.
a
J
U_
a.
I— w
Z
I— O
Z I—
w
• w.
U U.
O N:
O I-.
wuj
I— U
▪ O.
llwz
U =.
O I—:
1 1 1 1 •
NO10NINSVM7111V35
SL.VNV91II10114 IlILI
C6I1•CC /IfOL
z
0
W
Q.
WEST ELEVATION
Z
�'mi��t�S31,: ��•�is
NOIONINSVM Nrummni
3AIkla AVM3IVO
33NV1f1BwV 011Vd3HS 1104
Ols BNIOlIl9 03SOdOkld
an
^'4
rn • {ra
dvrp
.1ru•14
•
4111'■117 aH itwcNS
IA.m••n
oI ML.
..,,.
.<
1 1 1 1 •
NO10NINSVM7111V35
SL.VNV91II10114 IlILI
C6I1•CC /IfOL
z
0
W
Q.
WEST ELEVATION
Z
�'mi��t�S31,: ��•�is
NOIONINSVM Nrummni
3AIkla AVM3IVO
33NV1f1BwV 011Vd3HS 1104
Ols BNIOlIl9 03SOdOkld
SECTION D
SECTION .A
I I I 1 E
NO1ONINSVM'31UY3S
S AV NY1111131Nl Y/XI
L611.CtrnOa
13 apyont
NOJ.DNIHSVM 'VIIM)IfLL
MOO AVM31V0
33NVif1HMIV OHVd3HS :BOA
OL# ONIOlIna 03SOdO!!d
SECTION E
SECTION B
SECTION C
W44.
{ .Tl
n
MY •wi
Ml.ln NI, 11H91Vr
41 91.71
O1- Ka.,,,.,
.....,n
..n
SECTION D
SECTION .A
I I I 1 E
NO1ONINSVM'31UY3S
S AV NY1111131Nl Y/XI
L611.CtrnOa
13 apyont
NOJ.DNIHSVM 'VIIM)IfLL
MOO AVM31V0
33NVif1HMIV OHVd3HS :BOA
OL# ONIOlIna 03SOdO!!d
SECTION E
SECTION B
SECTION C
01—
0
01
1 1 l t e
N010NMSYM11UV3S
SAY NYONfM1M Sipa
t66I.CCllI0L
CCLP 'ON Bor '3'0'1
NOLONIHSVM 'V.UM4l1
3API3 N3H3YY0 • 3ARl0 AVM-11.V0
1131N30 31YHOd1100 AVM3IVO
OL# ON101lfl8 O3SOdOHd
a.
hltt Imo I1n1 1111MIY1Y 11.111.! 1111/1111
.4mm —us a'i f A�IYrI� 041"9� Prl
')U sssaupiug 6uIInsuo)
uasneySsa8
HMAIH 7ta1WYYMY30
R
0
9
a
R
tl
i
0
.sec -rd 039011011d
t G
4 tl
rpi
1A0131Y/
r-
rij
1 11 25
Avi
g }eioy°,j I 384
���.... .
f�.
p
W' H'I
: r a t sump inalum a I.wiwt yaw :wxw
66.
.-1•43 sn.s
N .
t.y
01—
0
01
1 1 l t e
N010NMSYM11UV3S
SAY NYONfM1M Sipa
t66I.CCllI0L
CCLP 'ON Bor '3'0'1
NOLONIHSVM 'V.UM4l1
3API3 N3H3YY0 • 3ARl0 AVM-11.V0
1131N30 31YHOd1100 AVM3IVO
OL# ON101lfl8 O3SOdOHd
a.
hltt Imo I1n1 1111MIY1Y 11.111.! 1111/1111
.4mm —us a'i f A�IYrI� 041"9� Prl
')U sssaupiug 6uIInsuo)
uasneySsa8
HMAIH 7ta1WYYMY30
R
0
9
a
R
tl
i
0
.sec -rd 039011011d
t G
4 tl
rpi
1A0131Y/
r-
rij
1 11 25
Avi
g }eioy°,j I 384
���.... .
f�.
•
: a`. 1tu': i '. +iv`;•��'ve?,f'aStr`111¢"n s5' "^ +:a}.A't�+.•.''i9'i:Sr':.
1 ! 1 1 6
NotoMNS6 6 ]UlY3s
S AYNY9W613/M UUI
/669•tt6/901
NOlONIHSVM •v lIM)Itll
3AR1O AVM31V0
30NV fl9P V 0HVd3HS 3104
OL# MOWS 03SOdOUd
LL
nb.71'p.
MY...,
!t,'A6Y J1I sisan.
1i, AI t'
•
: a`. 1tu': i '. +iv`;•��'ve?,f'aStr`111¢"n s5' "^ +:a}.A't�+.•.''i9'i:Sr':.
1 ! 1 1 6
NotoMNS6 6 ]UlY3s
S AYNY9W613/M UUI
/669•tt6/901
NOlONIHSVM •v lIM)Itll
3AR1O AVM31V0
30NV fl9P V 0HVd3HS 3104
OL# MOWS 03SOdOUd
LL
File:
iODD
35mm Drawing#
File:
• \
0
— SD
0
W W
u
Z z
0
zrf'z
t
SD
5D
5D
SD
SD
t5
ES
ES
SD
SO
ES
ES
ES
SD
SD
S
eJ
SD
SD•
111
�\ `\ ` • SPARE _
GFI
WP \ N
N \ N.
NORTH
ss
NI
SPARE
GFI
WP
NS
NS
—NS
NS
ROUTE TO ELI
SWITCHGEAR.
., c :.:,.`jt:a� ;W,. ;mi.?� ;4dr1;;1•; ?:;.;fir«
D EXISTING 750 KVA UTILITY TRANSFORMER TO BE REMOVED r SEA-
EATTLE
CITY LIGHT.
D EXISTING TRANSFORMER PAD TO BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED
OF BY CONTRACTOR.
D EXISTING 2 SETS OF 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS TO BE
INTERCEPTED AND EXTENDED TO NEW TRANSFORMER. SEATTLE CITY
LIGHT WILL PROVIDE PRIMARY CONDUCTORS.
NEW PRIMARY SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS PROVIDED BY NEW
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO USE FACTORY STEEL 36" IN RADIUS
SWEEPS AND EXTEND RIGID STEEL RISERS 18" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR.
PROVIDE BONDING BUSHINGS. MINIMUM BURIAL DEPTH 36" PER SEATTLE
CITY LIGHT STANDARDS.
D> EXISTING 3 SETS OF 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 TO BE INTERCEPTED AND
REROUTED TO NEW TRANSFORMER LOCATION. REMOVE EXISTING 4 #500
KCMIL CONDUCTORS FROM 2 USED SETS OFD CONDUITS. SALVAGED WIRE
TO BECOME PROPERTY OF CONTRACTOR.
1> NEW 3 SETS OF 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE LATERIAL CONDUCTORS.
USE STEEL SWEEPS WITH 36" IN RADIUS SWEEPS. PROVIDE 4 #750
KCMIL XHHW COPPER CONDUCTORS. PER REVISED ONE LINE DIAGRAM. SEE
SHEET E5.1 FOR ADDITIONAL WORK. • CONDUITS TO EXTENDED A MINIMUM
OF 18" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. PROVIDE BONDING BUSHINGS. SECURE
NEW CONDUITS TO ENCLOSURE WITH UNISTRUT. LEAVE 15' -0" OF PIGTAIL
CONDUCTORS WITH PHASE TAPE IDENTIFIED CONDUCTORS INSIDE
TRANSFORMER BUILDING FOR TERMINATION BY SEATTLE CITY LIGHT.
CONTRACTOR TO TERMINATE OTHER CONDUCTOR END.
1® ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE TENANT SPACE SERVICE LATERAL EXTEND TO
NO E # 2 AS PROVIDE OVE. STEEL HSEETEE5.1�FOR (ADDITIONAL MATCH
REQUIREMENTS.
> NEW TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL
NEW VAPOR TIGHT INCANDESCENT LIGHT FIXTURES MOUNTED +8' -0"
ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. PROVIDE PVC BACKBOX. FIXTURE TO BE RAB
#VXBR200DG —HW OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH CLEAR GLASS, DIE CAST
GUARD AND 300W LAMP. TYPICAL OF 4 LOCATIONS.
ss
TRANSFORMER PAD PARTIAL PLAN
se
1/4" = 1' -0"
ss SS
ss —
3/4 "x10' -0" COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD, LEAVE 6" EXPOSED ABOVE
FINISHED FLOOR TO GROUND WIRE ATTACHMENT. USE GROUND ROD
DRIVER TO LEAVE HEAD USABLE. TYPICAL 4 LOCATIONS. MOUNT IN
CORNER OF BUILDING SPACE.
CONNECT ALL GROUND RODS TOGETHER WITH #4 COPPER GROUND WIRE
& LEAVE. 10' -0" PIGTAILS FOR;;FINAL TERMINATION BY SEATTLE CITY LIGHT.
BOND. SLAB REBAR TO GROUND ROOS WITH #4 COPPER GROUND WIRE.
CONNECTION TO REBAR TO BE CADWELD TYPE.
PROVIDE A JUNCTION :BOX FOR FUTURE SUMP PUMP POWER.
FUSE TAP POINT. FOR 120 VAC BUILDING POWER: ALLOW FOR 3 CIRCUITS.
USE PVC SCHEDULE 40 WITH SUPPORTS FOR INTERIOR CONDUIT.
NOFF
project TUKWILA — SWITCH FACILITY
bY .JKS
location 13705 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 510
dent
ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
do. 10/23/98.
theckso MAM
dote
shut no.
R1. E1
lob• no.. :
98153.
. I!'1rl'�I °I_II�LIIfIL�IYI�L.'1' 'I1I�.�' TfTT�
OINCH
CHINA
•:T
IL' 1'!' I' II. IillI1IY�I! L�I�I' r :laf.11���I�f�l�l"!`i!I•!`L!T��
5 6
St PI Et; Zl `kl' Ot 6. e.. .* 9 9 V':.: E." Z :' .`rico
hilllil II" lilllliIillllladnIIIIiIIIilli .M iiIIIIIIi1IEI.fillIIIII IILilimh iiI ii!Imi[iluI1JIiii:ilhut oIIiiilliilili iilld
Z z
0
zrf'z
t
SD
5D
5D
SD
SD
t5
ES
ES
SD
SO
ES
ES
ES
SD
SD
S
eJ
SD
SD•
111
�\ `\ ` • SPARE _
GFI
WP \ N
N \ N.
NORTH
ss
NI
SPARE
GFI
WP
NS
NS
—NS
NS
ROUTE TO ELI
SWITCHGEAR.
., c :.:,.`jt:a� ;W,. ;mi.?� ;4dr1;;1•; ?:;.;fir«
D EXISTING 750 KVA UTILITY TRANSFORMER TO BE REMOVED r SEA-
EATTLE
CITY LIGHT.
D EXISTING TRANSFORMER PAD TO BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED
OF BY CONTRACTOR.
D EXISTING 2 SETS OF 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS TO BE
INTERCEPTED AND EXTENDED TO NEW TRANSFORMER. SEATTLE CITY
LIGHT WILL PROVIDE PRIMARY CONDUCTORS.
NEW PRIMARY SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS PROVIDED BY NEW
CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO USE FACTORY STEEL 36" IN RADIUS
SWEEPS AND EXTEND RIGID STEEL RISERS 18" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR.
PROVIDE BONDING BUSHINGS. MINIMUM BURIAL DEPTH 36" PER SEATTLE
CITY LIGHT STANDARDS.
D> EXISTING 3 SETS OF 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 TO BE INTERCEPTED AND
REROUTED TO NEW TRANSFORMER LOCATION. REMOVE EXISTING 4 #500
KCMIL CONDUCTORS FROM 2 USED SETS OFD CONDUITS. SALVAGED WIRE
TO BECOME PROPERTY OF CONTRACTOR.
1> NEW 3 SETS OF 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE LATERIAL CONDUCTORS.
USE STEEL SWEEPS WITH 36" IN RADIUS SWEEPS. PROVIDE 4 #750
KCMIL XHHW COPPER CONDUCTORS. PER REVISED ONE LINE DIAGRAM. SEE
SHEET E5.1 FOR ADDITIONAL WORK. • CONDUITS TO EXTENDED A MINIMUM
OF 18" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. PROVIDE BONDING BUSHINGS. SECURE
NEW CONDUITS TO ENCLOSURE WITH UNISTRUT. LEAVE 15' -0" OF PIGTAIL
CONDUCTORS WITH PHASE TAPE IDENTIFIED CONDUCTORS INSIDE
TRANSFORMER BUILDING FOR TERMINATION BY SEATTLE CITY LIGHT.
CONTRACTOR TO TERMINATE OTHER CONDUCTOR END.
1® ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE TENANT SPACE SERVICE LATERAL EXTEND TO
NO E # 2 AS PROVIDE OVE. STEEL HSEETEE5.1�FOR (ADDITIONAL MATCH
REQUIREMENTS.
> NEW TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL
NEW VAPOR TIGHT INCANDESCENT LIGHT FIXTURES MOUNTED +8' -0"
ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. PROVIDE PVC BACKBOX. FIXTURE TO BE RAB
#VXBR200DG —HW OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH CLEAR GLASS, DIE CAST
GUARD AND 300W LAMP. TYPICAL OF 4 LOCATIONS.
ss
TRANSFORMER PAD PARTIAL PLAN
se
1/4" = 1' -0"
ss SS
ss —
3/4 "x10' -0" COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD, LEAVE 6" EXPOSED ABOVE
FINISHED FLOOR TO GROUND WIRE ATTACHMENT. USE GROUND ROD
DRIVER TO LEAVE HEAD USABLE. TYPICAL 4 LOCATIONS. MOUNT IN
CORNER OF BUILDING SPACE.
CONNECT ALL GROUND RODS TOGETHER WITH #4 COPPER GROUND WIRE
& LEAVE. 10' -0" PIGTAILS FOR;;FINAL TERMINATION BY SEATTLE CITY LIGHT.
BOND. SLAB REBAR TO GROUND ROOS WITH #4 COPPER GROUND WIRE.
CONNECTION TO REBAR TO BE CADWELD TYPE.
PROVIDE A JUNCTION :BOX FOR FUTURE SUMP PUMP POWER.
FUSE TAP POINT. FOR 120 VAC BUILDING POWER: ALLOW FOR 3 CIRCUITS.
USE PVC SCHEDULE 40 WITH SUPPORTS FOR INTERIOR CONDUIT.
NOFF
project TUKWILA — SWITCH FACILITY
bY .JKS
location 13705 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 510
dent
ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
do. 10/23/98.
theckso MAM
dote
shut no.
R1. E1
lob• no.. :
98153.
. I!'1rl'�I °I_II�LIIfIL�IYI�L.'1' 'I1I�.�' TfTT�
OINCH
CHINA
•:T
IL' 1'!' I' II. IillI1IY�I! L�I�I' r :laf.11���I�f�l�l"!`i!I•!`L!T��
5 6
St PI Et; Zl `kl' Ot 6. e.. .* 9 9 V':.: E." Z :' .`rico
hilllil II" lilllliIillllladnIIIIiIIIilli .M iiIIIIIIi1IEI.fillIIIII IILilimh iiI ii!Imi[iluI1JIiii:ilhut oIIiiilliilili iilld
b
•
17'-4"
0
IV 1
III
ll
ilsi,
Ili 1111
1 li
PM
Ili;
1111 SHEET RI.S4 .
1 IRO
ill
HI
111
HI 111
lig;
lill 'El
la!:
1111 1
Is
Hill
1111:
-lxv missaa
NOTE: PROVIDE 2—#5 END STEEL AT EACH OPENING
AA
R1.S4
SECTION
1/4-.1“-cr
E
UAL
EQU
FLO D
L.
K TO
f6x15 @240.C.
L3
x1/4
5/8"0 ANCHORS
6 24"0.C.
3"
L4x4x3/8
7" LONG
Allk SECTION
3/4..
8" CMU — PAINT
TO MATCH EXISTING
BUILDING.
EXISTING GRADE
SEE DETAIL 2
SHEET R1.S4
24 GA. GALV. CAP FLASHING
OVER TREATED 2x8 BLOCKING —
MP BLOCKING TO SLOPE AS
INDICATED
EXTEND ROOFING MEMBERANE
TO TOP OF MASONRY
4" CONT. CANT
iBUILT UP ROOFING OVER
1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING
STEEL DECKING
W6x15
1/4 17 SIDES
2-3/4"0 ANCHORS •
DETAIL
3/4” 7 1"-0"
2—#5 48" OC
HORIZONTAL
. .
•
•
8"
• • •• •
57"
#4 CO 32" OC
. •
-Nxi• x //\
•
4 @ 32" OC VERT
EXISTING GRADE •
\)k'•\%/1)
s■ 7\,/, ,\;\
DETAIL
1/2.. v.-0..
N
(0
r
—#4 CONTINUOUS
A I IFPG Fl FIVNE 1EN4
mint TUKWILA — SWITCH FACILITY
by
DPM
location 13705 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 510
.r..c ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
dote 10/23/98
checked CDB
date
sheet no.
Rl.S4
job no.
98153
• r
0iNeH , 5 6
CHINA ,
' ' I '
„.„..
V ' El! GL • • ;L, ' Z •
0
••
0
1-1-
1 1 1
ELEVATION
1/4"=1'-o"
•
CMU WALL
BOND BM •
W/(2) #5 CONT
H.M. DOOR FRAME —
CONT. SEALANT 0
MASONRY JOINT
8" CMU ENCLOSURE —
PAINT TO MATCH
EXISTING BUILDING
RUSKIN ELF B11
EXT. ALUM. LOUVER
(2'-0"x6.-0') — TYP.
INSTALL PER MFGRS.
STD. MASONRY DETAILS
& RECOMMENDATIONS
EXISTING GRADE
s‘:
1 1• 1 • r
1 1 1
0
0
CONT. FLASHING —
PAINT
4
R133
ELEVATION
(2) CONT. COURSES SPLIT
FACED CMU IMMEDIATELY
ABOVE BOND BM.
•
8" CMU ENCLOSURE —
PAINT TO MATCH
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING GRADE
'
ACOFFMAN
NG1NEERS
project TUKWIIA — SWITCH FACILITY
by DPM
location 13705. GATEWAY DRIVE,. SUITE 510
dote
10/23/98
shieFi11
1°. S3
isem ELECTRIC UGHTWAVE
elledW CDB
date
98153
•
N
14'-8"
1'-4"
/2.-0"/
8'-0"
1 —4"
/ /
NORTH
7'-4"x7'-4"
HM DOOR
FRAME — PAINT
\- ALUMINUM LOUVER —
TYP. 0 (4) LOCATIONS
TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"
DOOR HARDWARE NOTES:
1. (3) PER DOOR — STANLEY CB1900 4.5x4.5 US26D
2. THRESHOLD — PEMKO P271A
3. LOCKS — BEST MORTISE LOCK SYSTEM PER
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
NORTH
ROOF PLAN
ROOF SCUPPER
SEE DETAIL 1,
SHEET R1.S2
3—PLY BUILT—UP
ROOF TO MATCH
EXIST. BLDG. •
1/8" =
24 GA GALV.
SCUPPER —
PAINT
1.1
4" DIA.
PVC DOWNSPUT —
PAINT
RUN ROOFING OVER •
PLYWOOD & INTO
SCUPPER
SCUPPER DETAIL
N.
NOTE; SCUPPER IS SIMILAR TO THOSE ON EXIST. BLDG.
AFPGTVEIN
proi
TUKWILA • SWITCH FACILITY
by DPM
1.u. 13705 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 510
:not • ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
dote 10/23/98
checked COB
dote
sheet no.
RtS2
job no.
98153
• 5 '•‘•••'''' • • . 6
- 0
I 1, "•1•. I ..
.. •
111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111.1.11.11111.111.1111.11111MIIIII11.1111111111111.1111111111H11111111 1 1 1 . I .
Ai
1
/
I
wAimmir
I
0
lo.
r
101 -0-
UV
8" CMU WALLS
1
.
)
-1
in
.d.fIN. FLOOR . • .
l'EL=+01-0"
H
•4-
42x72 HM
36x84 HM
d
1.,
co
PrVWAIIIMIVAIIIVIIIIS
W6x15 CAST IN
PLACE — TOP FLUSH
WITH FINISHED FLOOR
MI
a
-
NORTH
7'-4"x7'-4"
HM DOOR
FRAME — PAINT
\- ALUMINUM LOUVER —
TYP. 0 (4) LOCATIONS
TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"
DOOR HARDWARE NOTES:
1. (3) PER DOOR — STANLEY CB1900 4.5x4.5 US26D
2. THRESHOLD — PEMKO P271A
3. LOCKS — BEST MORTISE LOCK SYSTEM PER
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
NORTH
ROOF PLAN
ROOF SCUPPER
SEE DETAIL 1,
SHEET R1.S2
3—PLY BUILT—UP
ROOF TO MATCH
EXIST. BLDG. •
1/8" =
24 GA GALV.
SCUPPER —
PAINT
1.1
4" DIA.
PVC DOWNSPUT —
PAINT
RUN ROOFING OVER •
PLYWOOD & INTO
SCUPPER
SCUPPER DETAIL
N.
NOTE; SCUPPER IS SIMILAR TO THOSE ON EXIST. BLDG.
AFPGTVEIN
proi
TUKWILA • SWITCH FACILITY
by DPM
1.u. 13705 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 510
:not • ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE
dote 10/23/98
checked COB
dote
sheet no.
RtS2
job no.
98153
• 5 '•‘•••'''' • • . 6
- 0
I 1, "•1•. I ..
.. •
111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111.1.11.11111.111.1111.11111MIIIII11.1111111111111.1111111111H11111111 1 1 1 . I .
:,�Lt ;liYli•�
STEEL DECK;
ROOF:
SUPPLEMENTAL GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
B DECK: 1 1/2" X 20 GAGE GALVANIZED DECK WITH SHEET WIDTH =
36 ", MINIMUM I = 0.216 IN *4, MINIMUM +5 = 0.235 IN *3. MINIMUM
DIAPHRAGM SHEAR CAPACITY = 670 LBS /FT. (MAXIMUM DIAPHRAGM SHEAR
CAPACITY = 360 LBS /FT.)
MASONRY;
HOLLOW CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C90 GRADE N,
TYPE 1, RUNNING BOND.
MORTAR SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C270, TYPE S (MASONRY CEMENT SHALL
NOT BE USED), 1800 PSI.
GROUT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C476, 2000 PSI. MECHANICALLY VIBRATE
GROUT IN VERTICAL SPACES IMMEDIATELY AFTER POURING. PROVIDE
CLEANOUTS IF GROUT LIFT EXCEEDS 4' -0 ". MAXIMUM GROUT LIFT SHALL
BE 8' -0" .
SPECIFIED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH F'm SHALL BE 1500 PSI. SPECIAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. VERIFICATION OF THE SPECIFIED
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UBC SECTION
2105.3.
VERTICAL REINFORCING (APPLIES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE):
1 #5 BAR IN CENTER OF GROUT AT CENTER OF WALL, CONTINUOUS FULL
HEIGHT OF WALL WITH ONE BAR AT ALL CORNERS, INTERSECTIONS, WALL
ENDS, BEAM BEARINGS, JAMBS AND EACH SIDE OF CONTROL JOINTS AND AT
INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 48" O.C. LAP SPLICES SHALL BE 48 BAR DIAMETERS.
DOWEL ALL VERTICAL REINFORCING TO THE FOUNDATION WITH DOWELS TO MATCH
VERTICAL WALL OR COLUMN REINFORCING:
HORIZONTAL REINFORCING (APPLIES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE):
2 #5 BARS IN MINIMUM 8" DEEP GROUTED CONTINUOUS BOND BEAM AT ROOF
AND ELEVATED FLOOR LINES (AND AT 4' -0" O.C. MAXIMUM). 1 #5 BAR IN
MINIMUM 8" DEEP GROUTED CONTINUOUS BOND BEAM AT TOP OF PARAPET OR TOP
OF FREESTANDING WALL. PLACE THESE BARS CONTINUOUS THROUGH CONTROL
JOINTS AT ROOF AND FLOOR LINES AND WRAP MASTIC TAPE FOR 1' -6" EACH SIDE
OF CONTROL JOINT. PROVIDE BENT BARS TO MATCH HORIZONTAL BOND BEAM
REINFORCING AT CORNERS AND WALL INTERSECTIONS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN BOND BEAM
CONTINUITY LAP SPLICES SHALL BE 48 .BAR DIAMETERS. STAGGER ALTERNATE •
SPLICES A MINIMUM OF 48 BAR DIAMETERS. .
REINFORCING STEEL;
DEFORMED BARS:
60 FOR #4 AND LARGER.
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS;
CONCRETE:
DURING THE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE AND THE TAKING OF TEST SPECIMENS.
SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR FREQUENCY OF TESTING.
FOUNDATION;
ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE = 1000 PSF PER ASSUMPTION
CONCRETE;
CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF
ACI 301, "SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS"
AND ACI 318, "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED
CONCRETE ". SUBMIT MIX DESIGNS FOR EACH CLASS OF CONCRETE. ALL
CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
CLEAR CONCRETE COVERAGE (APPLIES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE):
CONCRETE CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH
FORMED CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER
FORMED CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER
FROM TOP SURFACE OF SLAB ON GRADE
3"
2"
1 1/2"
1 1/2"
COFFMAN
protect TUKWILA — SWITCH FACILITY
by DPM
location 13705 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 510 •
date 10/23/98
client ELECTRIC . LIGHTWAVE
checked CDB
date
sheet no.
R1.S1
jab no.
98153
•5L P1. £L Zt 6a �' "OI 6, 8 L 9 5 W ' £ Z '` 150
_ Iiiiflliii hillI1II Iiiiliiiiliiiiliililiililiild110111 1! !IIIII1III IIllii.i! iiiitIJIiIIII liuil!iI!II!LlIWI !R401I!I0iiiliaiiliiiiliiii1
File:
mm Drawin#
B
APPRuVED-
DATE.
1
Tfl.,E,,ITER PAR Vgf
_
E
I .
•
....... • -
•
I • • =4>
1.2
1
r— • 7 ye/
r
1 1
'::- daNyE.111:....•:.12- r1.•::::;..I.:.A.,..-..7..-7.F.)-,,,,,,,,,"—,,,
...7or
,e0,,,,,,i,,,......,.,....... ...5,,..,,,...,........--*._5-..0....,7,.64:".:4,wt,,,fii.,1
, • r L. .
le:', II.:titi
Y 1
V
51.
754C) •
r
$
•
EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN
iftr.° rjc;,..c •
.
X5,C)
EXISTINGSTREET TREES TO RE RELOCATED! I
eutorbatimni MALYS* OF TREES BY X
LANDSCAPE ARCHiTECT IN SPRING
• I • •
• , • '
OFFICE
•NEW JC PENNEY' •
HOME STORE 3
OEI
0
1—
tri
• <
L.1.;
;. RECEIVED
;•
4,
Itc,CE.
9.14:1+
Cr
mvt1 U
;:■'■■7:(r:
1,7111.11. 26.1144
110.111 01 •
AIGnitLit0
.01,71C
•
,-c1...;117 K
7 Mec,1.1 l'797
.... ...............................................
•
rA4 P43. • • • • I g
.. . . .. .. II
4 . I:
. . .f.
f: ..—_
;
. .
C 11 li
"*;•'-•••1'- • . "--;--- -11,7,-;•-i',.77;1',--7-7;1;-;-7,..4,77;L77,,,, i
If
.
',I i
;1"
1 '1 .- . .
.
VAS .1 (CET
6
20625;iT51. 0 20 44
• 1•. ri 11111 M 1 1111'1
I
FTM I 11:911 Pill I it)
0.111111pp . , ,
0INCH - 1 6
• • • .• , • •
CHINA I ,
•2L VI. LI t6 8 • L • '•• Z , • "
. . itliiilf1111.1i.r11011[1111111111101111.11i1
• • • I
JUN 02 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPAPX.
• — JANUARY 21. 1997
SCALE: .1.* 20•4"
L-1
1
1;5
e.,,, ,,.
';`, '
I ".„.
1 ,
-
If
• I":,,
Ze.:10
..
,,
•
' i',,
OEI
0
1—
tri
• <
L.1.;
;. RECEIVED
;•
4,
Itc,CE.
9.14:1+
Cr
mvt1 U
;:■'■■7:(r:
1,7111.11. 26.1144
110.111 01 •
AIGnitLit0
.01,71C
•
,-c1...;117 K
7 Mec,1.1 l'797
.... ...............................................
•
rA4 P43. • • • • I g
.. . . .. .. II
4 . I:
. . .f.
f: ..—_
;
. .
C 11 li
"*;•'-•••1'- • . "--;--- -11,7,-;•-i',.77;1',--7-7;1;-;-7,..4,77;L77,,,, i
If
.
',I i
;1"
1 '1 .- . .
.
VAS .1 (CET
6
20625;iT51. 0 20 44
• 1•. ri 11111 M 1 1111'1
I
FTM I 11:911 Pill I it)
0.111111pp . , ,
0INCH - 1 6
• • • .• , • •
CHINA I ,
•2L VI. LI t6 8 • L • '•• Z , • "
. . itliiilf1111.1i.r11011[1111111111101111.11i1
• • • I
JUN 02 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPAPX.
• — JANUARY 21. 1997
SCALE: .1.* 20•4"
L-1
{
PREPINISHED METAL COPING
EIPB PANELS WITH
MELO AND ACCENT COLORS
PREPINISHED METAL COPING
PREPINISHED METAL FLASHING
EIPB SYSTEM
ROOF AT TRUCK DOCK
BEYOND
M
SMOOTH me 12' THICK CMU MITE UN
SOLDIER COURSE • ACCENT COLOR
SMOOTH PACE 6«6«18 CMU
FIELD COLOR
SPLIT FACE 6N4616 CMU
ACCENT COLOR
SMOOTH FACE 16' CMU SOLDIER COURSE
FIELD COLOR
ome \Stnra`
SOUTH ELEVATION (FACING MINKLER)
PREPINISHED METAL FLASHING
TYPICAL DISPLAY WINDOW
SIPS PANEL WITH ACCENT COLOR
• •• l LEIPS SYSTEM
uuunnuumunuuun
..........................
1
CONCRETE BASE
ACCENT COLOR
WEST ELEVATION (FACING SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY)
r
SPLIT PACE 6NM616 CMU
ACCENT COLOR
SMOOTH PACE 16' CMU SOLDIER
COURSE •• mew COLOR
CONCRETE BASE
ACCENT COLOR
ALUMINUM AND GLASS STOREFRONT
IN IVIDUALLY LETTERED SIGNAGE
TOTAL SIGN AREA • APPROX. 110 S0. PT.
MAX. ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA • 150 SQ. FT.
•
LOCATED ATED ROOFTOP ND METAL ROOF PEAKS FOR
MAXIMUM SCREENING. WHeRe NOT POSSIBLE
7TOO cLOOCCApTE�ABTeHIyN�D HHIGGHHI ROOF PAINT UNITS
TS
CONSTRUCT SCRee'NINO WHIR! UNITS ARe VISIBLE•
GROUND FACE 50616 CMU
ACCENT COLOR
SPLIT FACE W1616 CMU
ACCENT COLOR
• Haime`t Shire,
ID
ems PANELS WITH
• FIELD AND ACCENT COLORS
INDIVIDUALLY LETTERED SIGNAOO
ALUMINUM AND GLASS STOREFRONT TOTAL SIGN AREA • APPROX. 11O SQ. FT.
MAX ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA • t50 SG. PT.
SIPS SYSTEM •• FIELD &
ACCENT COLORS
i-
BEYOND RoOF AT ENTRY
EARTH BERM & LANDSCAPE PLANTING
NORTH ELEVATION TO SCREEN DOCK
LOADING MeA BEYOND SMOOTH FACE 6«6«16 CMU
PIELD COLOR
TROOP AT ENTRY
BEYOND
HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FAME
FIELD COLOR
CONCRETE BASe
ACCENT COLOR
rsunn .
in.m. nn..
n .
.•.utii•i:ii
u
Tukwila, Washington
. 1.. St al WI w4=1.1
RECEIVED:.
WALL•PACK LIGHT FIXTURE
TYPICAL AT EXTERIOR DOORS
•
B
EAST ELEVATION (FACING WAREHOUSE).
HOLLOW METAL DOOR MD FRAME
PIeLD COLOR
JUN 02 1997
DEVELOPMENT
LOADING AREA
: . VI 6k ;: k 6 p 'L: ' ; 9: 5 4'' %: E Z :711b'0
Ifiiifiiiiliiiiliiiiliiiiii1iil6iiil1iiiliiiii 11110il.1.ii1lii111111ilii1 Ii1i;ilf111. iiiliaiifil�illii11� d i. ii�ii�i�ii��iii�iii�iI
MW -1
JJAJAH
1HO $ 0. IMO.
IT
FOR RMIT
ONLY
ma mewl 1t16 6661 IOAMJ
TD WOO M MY16�6r
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
• 96235.01
METAL DOORS AND FRAMES yI -29 -97
FIELD COLOR eA011086.01k61BAR•A6.0
B.AR^
APPROVED
DATE 1121 INITIpI 4 �LCZ
A_ 1
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.�.....�.
•
• • " • . . .•
t •
•
• :I
1•
B
APIPRoVED
51052..INITIALS.194.1.
•
•
fD/..z 0-nc-147o r
• re...A. nel detc-J 601)-1-411
VerZtA.) rec-,763-e_e_A- .. .
per-. • 4-(_ r--
•
) 1‘
...MN. You vlOsa,
417..r—
/a/.....1.•••■■ •
'
Irro :
- •
•
Poe Vow
Wv..•.• nal
as. 0:3 •
41,■• IWO
mall *An 1M pe
Tree Planting and Staking
•I
SAIFInt sorm
TREES
PLANT SC.44EDULE
„ ACERLUIZPA.FRAMSRE07
puuwttt
COMJSROLGSCHNEV
F1TSCWTINC.00
CUPRESSCCYPAMEYWC4
;MIAMI MAASS;
PSIEDOTSVIAMENZESCV
• CCUCIA5Fe
FIAUS GRAMMA AEDSP•Ar
Rev.nnestAri
WALES
•
2.I/20AL BO
12.14 NT MIN FULL
pox STE.. 81.13 ruu.
5' CLEAR TRUNK RM.
11. HT. MW FULL
9.17 HT SIB
FULL
340 HT I3213 •
Ft111•CT SMEARED
2.I'2• CAL DAB
1244• HT ANN FULL
CERBEWWILLWA PUFFU 5CAL C0.1 FLU
VALUAUPCIUMIAPBCPRT • 2, FULL
, 0 LUCRE...JAY:MEN [SLAW
.1APNIESE '<ILLY 0.-CCIIT
21 .21 FULL
'ILENALTACLARUISS/
SSASCI4 HOLLY CIAL WO FULL
2t.2, FULL
kIVRY,A411,0;02CA, •
WAUTYRILE • 'LIZ' PAL
. •• &IMAM SURRH00011i
SWE
5 FIAL
• 2, FULL •
ANIS HSC0 MOO I GAL COW FULL
1.,Loioryk Se 0.C.
® AltASSUUIFICCENk•WSIABELIANN I GALCCOlt FULL
2ARCLIAMEL •
• F.CSULAR.A.A0FACNALLSVCSASSVAIP4444T,
MCCAW/ 1 CAL CYNT FULL
O. %%MAW SAVO; / C...CCHT AAL
2, FULL
•
. %VOW AiliNJ8 SKIM .411E Sr....COO FUU.
• LALIRWMIS 2, FULL •
.
• CALLINCCOVERS •
COTONEASTES OWE.° 1 GAL CCW FLU
BE4REEIRICMCKASTER 2U0C.TFI.SU. Typ.
ERICA CARNCA•SPANGWOCOPoi0
HEATREIS • PIM •
1 C.N.COHT FULL
2, 0 C. FRI. SP. TIP.
ARCTOMAPHYLOSUVA.LISS“ 1 GALCOIT RA1.
,IONNINAINCK . .2S. 0.C.TRI.P.TYP
...;
PsyviSuumeoususorrou.rotze 1 CL..CCNT FLIL
' OTTO LLTYNDIUUREL 240.0 TR. SP. WI..
SEIDEL/LAM MES*C.
&MUMMA SECO MU SEZSMC
• , \ DOMING TREES TOSE RELOCATED
1 crt )
Evergreen Tree Planting oetail
,-:
.1 " "
,•1
6
„
, . 5
CHINJ(/ •
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'11.1111111.11111:11111[11.1.0111111111i11111111.1J111[111111111,0111.11.11111,111:1H111111111111.111111i111:
Nu Seale
mtT1111.N
og .5U1rAL
• ....RECEIVED
d: ...I.., • .
•
•
Shrub Planting
JUN 02 1997
. COMMUNITY . .
DEVELORIVihilt1.0
• ...
•
•
SCALE:. 112 2°211.—
• L - 2
1