Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L97-0017 - OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE - LANDSCAPE DESIGN REVIEWL97 -0017 OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE 16500 Southcenter Pkwy. DESIGN REVIEW City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 10, 1997 Jim Holtz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Outback Steakhouse Restaurant (L97 -0017) 17510 Southcenter Parkway Revised Walkway Plan Dear Jim: The revised walkway plan proposed between the new Outback Steakhouse Restaurant and the existing Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel that you submitted on September 25, 1997 has been approved by the Planning Division. The revision meets the Board of Architectural Review condition that, should a raised sidewalk interfere with storm drainage, a clearly delineated crosswalk may be substituted (per Condition #1 of the staff report, approved on May 22, 1997). You will also be responsible for making appropriate changes to your building permit application submittal, as well as any and all other current and subsequent permit applications for the Outback Steakhouse Restaurant. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (206) 431 -3673. • Alexa Berlo'v Associate Planner cc: City Reviewing Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 October 6, 1997 City of Tukwila FILE COP W. john Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Kent Dacy Heath Signs 1762 Airport Way S. Seattle, WA 98134 RE:,OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE Sign Permit Applications. S97 -087 & S97 -088 Dear Mr. Dacy: As you know from our conversation on October 3, 1997, there are several inconsistencies with the sign permit applications you have submitted on behalf of Outback Steakhouse. I have reviewed each of the permits submitted and have listed my concerns in the sections below. I am also including several handouts for your review. Freestanding Sign (S97 -088) • The applications requests a 100 SF freestanding sign based on 459 feet of lot frontage. An examination of the Binding Site Plan (L97 -0036) shows that the applicant has only 211 feet of frontage along Southcenter Parkway. With this smaller frontage, Outback is allowed a maximum of 75 SF of signage on its freestanding sign. For more information, please review the attached copy of the Binding Site Plan. • The application site plan shows the pole of the freestanding sign located in the utility easement that runs parallel to Southcenter Parkway. The easement extends 20 feet into the property, and prohibits the construction of any structure within the easement area. It will be necessary to relocate the pole to a more suitable location. • The application site plan also shows an insufficient setback from the west property line for the leading edge of the sign. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 19.32.070 requires that freestanding signs be setback a distance equal to the overall height of the sign from all property lines. It may be in your best interest to provide a more detailed site plan which clearly calls out the correct property lines. This will make the permit review process proceed more smoothly. • As a condition of approval from the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), the freestanding sign was to be modified to reflect the architectural character and theme of the restaurant. After a meeting with the planner in charge of the project's design review process, it was discovered that the proposed sign does not meet the conditions imposed by the BAR. Please discusthis issue with the applicant and resubmit a design which will meet the approval conditions. Questions about the design conditions can be directed to Alexa Berlow at (206) 431 -3670. I have also attached a copy of the Notice of Decision for your review. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 _ z -Z. w 6 U 0.. N 0. .w w w O, 4a. J. ti = 1w Z�. 0. Z1: tri 0 1-. w w' iui Z U =. Off'. z The sign permit application was missing project address and applicants address information. This basic information is very important to timely processing of any sign permit application. Please review all information requests on the sign permit application forms and fill them out completely in the future. Wall Sign (S97 -087) • The application listed a wall area of 1,596 and a proposed sign area of 57 SF. Review of the building elevation you submitted October 3, 1997 indicated that the actual wall area for the west elevation is 711 SF. With the correct wall area calculations, the max. allowed sign area is 33.4 SF. • By applying for a Special Sign Permit, it may be possible to increase the allowed sign area for the project to 6% of the Exposed Building Face (EBF). This is based on a sign area bonus of 50% of the allowed sign area for every doubling of the required building setback (TMC 19.32.140 (A)). This bonus is allowed up to amaximum of 6% of the building face (TMC 19.32.150). If approved, the special sign permit will allow a 42.6 SF sign. This is less than the 57 SF requested in the original application but it is the maximum allowed for this facade under current Code. • The application did not include building elevations with wall area calculations. This information is required in the application checklist. The elevations provided were incomplete, not to scale and not representative to the approved design. It is important to review the Tukwila Sign Code before applying for any sign permit to ensure that wall area calculations are made accurately. If you do not have a copy of the sign code, please contact the Planning Department and ask for a Planner to explain the applicable sections. I have attached a copy of my wall and sign area calculations for your review. If you wish, you may sign, date stamp and resubmit them with the other requested information. Please keep a copy of these calculations in your files for future reference. Please review all of the issues listed above and resubmit the requested information as soon as possible. It will also be necessary to submit a Special Sign Permit application if you wish to increase the allowed sign area for the wall sign. After October 8, 1997 the planner in charge of this project will be Michael Jenkins. He can be reached at (206)431 -3685. Hans A. Korve Department of Community Development z • • mow` 2: 0 0. CO =. H N. w o. u. a; D. i • • ' Z_ I- 0 •z LIJ •U 10.-; w ut H -1 — 0: • wz •0 F- z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development. Div's'on eats June 17; 1997 John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director The Board of Architectural Review adopted the staff report to build an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant (May 22, 1997) with the following conditions, to be addressed prior to issuance of their building permit: f1. • Add a three (3) inch raised sidewalk for pedestrians connecting the restaurant • and hotel. Should the sidewalk interfere 1•i'ith storm drainage, a clearly delineated crosswalk maybe substituted • a - ape requirements' to augment landscaping around the restaurant building in place of along Southcenter Parkway. Specifically, add larger trees • around the building base, particularly on the east side of the resra.urantlacing the hotel, eA 3. Staff will work with applicant to modify the design of the pole sign ro reflect the architecticrcil character and theme of the restaurant. Prepared By: Alexa Berlow 630g' dhcenter Boulevard, Sulte #100 • Tukwila, Washington 947 2aDa N1rf i >bii .4,iAlch = t E • ,LF.. E' T15 00 39tid 6bILLtL90Z !.. UO u)o. 5 In w, LL w 0'. J ia.'i _ Z�; I- z F-;. uj o co o w O. ui :U 17: F- z CONVERTATION RECORD DATE: / /117 DAY: L"'" % 'WE WED THU FRI SAT SUN TIME: I al, TYPE: ❑ Visit ❑ Conference ❑ Telephone — Name of persj(s) contacted or in contact with you: / -44/h 4' t--(._ &C Sfr / Organization (office, dept., oi.ireau, etc.) . n..b l P V0e. Location of Visit/Conference: o Incoming Obutgoing f ?,[I FOR OFRCE USE ONLY Telephone No.: 49 2� 7(c'oO SUBJECT: e n e 1 Sk t Ic 11 ct c-C_ SUMMARY: N47. t--61.ses-7 hl p-Ae ..60 I iz7;le.1 Al--17:4, fl c. (')/e l ( ,.d 1/� eat. ,--(4, he (7i. err ai2e4 itwiyi&( Ift,e-c (7v 4411 731 kol-tpe: -1411,r4vnti,rtt 1ec'ii 7- 2 1- kAth, I Inz )7 1 OeC eyhoL-11_5 (L2t 144, 0/%La /V,r? C 1-d 1'v 2( c e(P-ii 7] (1'Yi p ,6 ze 'L i7 1 J/i & *te; - Iris B l P �rrt tv(v1d b( 1/7P GC,4 2,c, L (c4A tj t49 (y/c(i471/�ef" 41,01 1- if h-t- /7Wp24/ ( bet,h_e1 a i / Vtd. ' c(C / �7�- lil'gd2171,1, nLL Izt P lit i w(f) -2o( h ( hg u_ o s,z,,6„ <<. i,G/ p Live/1-160-(o' / a 6 7 6./21 lila 1 wzri,qed ' kw i be I, r, _ i ,fpe, or 1-7(/--2 x/11 •17/,./v) 1 al 7 ve C2, f 1 iti 1`c ( /keyc ,ii9 3 C 'll luGc.l .-2,. 2- ( 117 � p � 11/tA.,2 GG 11,1, its >f�'�, L ( 1 i E ( -v Y� z 6zv Llq J 1 „ c'' uk? Yi �'t✓�.E.1fikiY�biiSi'�SY��'7��. it�Ls�'3 P?r Luc,' Ate' prztvK.} v42�.�r,'.''F?�rt?YiY�t;ii =s�.tF +fit„ °A�;±f' I• A F F I D A V I T 0 Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting f Board of Adjustment Agenda Q Board of Appeals Agenda O Planning Commission Agenda Packet Packet Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Determination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action Official Notice otherfiriri a or D - 11,0 ._. Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on 7 (11C- LN i Z INF.- K \C-K- 1-eta2 Apc1 rrtcf \S00 - \? 1 v44 cws.cyc Cio Pow Mpre-v ► N f 1- Co 500 ,o8 M,,�,N�f- 18D Name of Project taACK- File Number ‘L- i O011 2.) No..CDU1J i m&I 17 i Is) o.: 3oc -I'+1- M Gj /k11-1 -� , WA- °4 Signature :: To: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION May 29, 1997 • Merrick D. Lentz (Applicant) • Outback Steakhouse (Owner) • King County Assessor, Accounting Division This letter serves as a Notice of Decision for approval of a Land Use Permit to build an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant and associated landscaping on an existing asphalt -paved parking pad currently used by Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel, located at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, Washington. The Board of Architectural Review adopted the staff report on May 22, 1997 and the permit issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following Type 4 project and permit approvals with the following conditions: 1. Add a three (3) inch raised sidewalk for pedestrians connecting the restaurant and hotel. Should the sidewalk interfere with storm drainage, a clearly delineated crosswalk may be substituted. 2. Modify landscape requirements to augment landscaping around the restaurant building in place of along Southcenter Parkway. Specifically, add larger trees around the building base, particularly on the east side of the restaurant facing the hotel. 3. Staff will work with applicant to modify the design of the pole sign to reflect the architectural character and theme of the restaurant. The staff report on this project is attached. PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER: L97 -0017 APPLICANT: Merrick D. Lentz, Architect for Outback Steakhouse, Owner PROJECT LOCATION: 16500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, Washington 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 ' �' •z a • s, rw 6 D1 -J C.) UO,• ww N LL" w 0; w � a _, z� �0 :z� ;WI ILI ui z; 0 z Notice of Decision Outback Steakhouse Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Textual description, 8.5 x 11" site plan, building elevations, and other appropriate support materials: The applicant will construct an Outback Steakhouse restaurant on an asphalt -paved parking pad currently used by Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel. The project will consist of a 6,302 square foot, one -story "ranch- style" building with associated landscaping, lighting, and pedestrian pathways. Existing parking spaces will be allocated for the new business to meet City parking code. PERMITS SUBMI'1�1ED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE APPLICATION: None ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION (IF ANY): (DNS) Determination of Non - Significance Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Administrative appeals for the various permit types: The period for administrative appeals is 14 days, starting from the issuance of this Notice of Decision. The administrative body hearing each appeal is shown below. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review by City Council. Appeal materials shall contain: 1. Name of the appealing party, 2. Address and phone number of the appealing party and if the appealing party is a corporation, association, or group, their address and phone number, a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf, and 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit(s) are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA. Hours are Monday through Friday between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Alexa Berlow, who may also be contacted directly at (206) 431 -3673 for further information. • z a rt 00 U) w' w= JH. CO u,: • D. w o. I C. w. H =. Z �. •z F- ILE C)' Ou F-: • w u. H- • O. :iii z. O z • CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Merrick D. Lentz, Architect, has filed application to build an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant located at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, adjacent to the Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel. Permits applied for include: • Design Review • Environmental SEPA Other known required permits include: • Building Permit • Sign Permit Studies required with the application include: • Traffic Study • Drainage Study A�ailabl for Public Revie The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view these files, you,may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100. Project files include: • L97 -0017 (Design Review) • E97 -0006 (Environmental SEPA) pportun�ties for Public Comrienl The public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, has been SCHEDULED FOR MAY 22, 1997 AT 7:00 P.M. To confirm the time and date, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information, call Alexa Berlow at 431 -3673, or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 -5:00 p.m. Application Filed: March 14, 1997 Notice of Completeness issued: April 15, 1997 Notice of Application issued: April 25, 1997 A F F I D A V I T • • I , 5\i 1.\I) A % cANV - –E1 Notice of Public Hearing D Notice of Public Meeting L Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet fl Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fl Planning Commission Agenda Packet f Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Li Determination of Non - significance J Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ODetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action 0 Of f icial Notice 0 Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses £S—rF1r-- on I�� Name of Project 005P-V---61-6-AK-410U95--Signature / 1 `' jig 1 File Number L-C1 l - DO (1 z • .0 .0: U'; • • to W ;` W.2; • NLL W Oi u. i.. " • Z 0 W p; uy • off W w; 1--V: O Cu z` U • O ~' :z i 262304-9004-06 ! • SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE 781988 ATTN: JAMES J GUDIN 1 25425 CENTER RIDGE RD CLEVELAND OH 44145 . . 262304-9005-05 • ; DAYTON.HUDSON CORP 951249 C/O PROPERTY TAX DEPT • • 777 NICOLLET MALL • MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 ] 262304-9021-05 SUNRAY.INVESTMENTS 432306 C/O. METROMARK.INVESTMENT MN 14335 NE 24TH ST 4202 '•; BELLEVUE WA 98007 1. 262304-9076-09 :FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC 260318 ATTN: TAX •DEPARTMENT — SHF 7 W 7TH ST CINCINNATI OH 45202 262304-9102-07 FANA CORPORATION . -6051.S 194TH''STREET' KENT WA 262304-9104-05 •CHEVRON SERVICES CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT P0'BOX',265 HOUSTON TX 569999 98031 650775 77001 262304-9123-07e CAPTIAL & COUNTIES USA INC 361132 101:CALIFORNIA ST SUITE 2525 SAWFRANCISCO CA 94111 • 262304-9141-00 SCHOFIELD ROBERT HCLESLIE M150386 4212 HUNTS POINT RD .BELELVUE WA 98004 537920-0241-07 DOUBLETREE INN. 420463 C/O POER MARVIN F & COMPANY 500 108TH ,AVE NE 4760 BELLEVUE WA 98004 537920-0282-07 REDLEY ENTERPRISES INC 430007 13635 BEL—RED RD BELLEVUE WA 98005 537920-0290-07 ARGUS GROUP LTD IVERSON IRVIN 320 108TH AVE NE 4406 BELLEVUE WA 537920-0300-05 SIZZLING PLATTER OF WASH 348 EAST 6400 SOUTH 4200 MURRAY. UT 6N1695 98004 481012 34107 537920-0315-08 PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT C241709 PROPERTY TAXES PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 .• • • . • . . ,, - • Cheryl Graves 16400.Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 205 Tukwila, WA 98188 Hallmark Mortgage 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 208 Tukwila, WA, 98188 Joel Roy & Assoc. '16400 Southcenter Prkwy. ;Suite 404 ,Tukwila, WA 98188 J. William Larson & Co. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. 'Suite 306 `,Tukwila, WA 98188 Kits Camera j16400 Southcenter Prkwy. 'Suite 301 iTukwila, WA 98188 • Renae Krlapp Color Inst. ;16400 Southcenter Prkwy. !'Suite 307 ('Tukwila, WA 98188 1';LPL Tebhnical Services (16400 Southcenter Prkwy. X; 'Suite 510 iTukwila, WA 98188 Merrill Schultz & Assoc. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 300 y;= ,Tukwila , WA 98188 ;!Metropolitan Home Mortgage 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 308 Tukwila, WA 98188 Metropolitan Life .'I16400 Southcenter Prkwy. ;Suite 410 Tukwila,. WA 98188 . .. -�. Onsite Energy Corp. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 204 Tukwila, WA 98188 Parkway Dental Care 16400 Southcenter Prkwy: Suite 102 Tukwila, WA 98188 Retirement Solutions 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 510 Tukwila, WA 98188 Riviera Finance 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 305 Tukwila, WA 98188 Law Office of Michael Riley 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 205 Tukwila, WA 98188 Rodrigo Int'1 Commodities 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 504 Tukwila, WA 98188 Alan McSurger, Attorney 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 407 Tukwila, WA 98188 S.W. King Co. Chamber of Commerce 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 210 Tukwila, WA 98188 Volt Services Group 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 201 Tukwila, WA 98188 Lawrence S. Wallach, PS 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 408 Tukwila, WA 98188 Wash. St. Republican Party 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 200 , Tukwila, WA 98188 Chevron 220 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Camera's West 235 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 'Target 301 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 1- JU U O; i N0 W= J f-. w O` 2 to co d z �. F- O Z W 2 0 0, 'O N 1— wW 1- U a. 1': O; W Z: 022, O H- z Magnolia Hi Fi 16600 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Toys .R Us , 16700 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Fast Signs 16870 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Pak Mail 16864 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 .China Coin 16860 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Miyabi Japanese Restaurant Black Tie 16820 Southcenter Prkwy. 16854 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Tukwila, WA 98188 Half -Price Books 16828 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Futon Gallery Furniture 16830 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Houlihan''s Hiring 16890 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Econopage. 16880 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 < Marlow's Fine Jewelry 16876 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Southcenter Nails j 16874 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Houlihan's 16850 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Southcenter Flower Market 16415 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Southcenter Cosmetic Surg. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 101 Tukwila, WA 98188 • Adams Temporaries 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 400 Tukwila, WA 98188 .Applied Systems 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 501 Tukwila, WA 98188 Ashton Corp. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 502 Tukwila, WA ?81L88 Magnolia Hi Fi Installation C.B. Comm. Real Estate Center 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. 16832 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Tukwila, WA 98188 McDonald's Rest. Southcntr 16501 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sizzler Restaurant 16615 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 See's Candies, Inc. 16425 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Skarbos Scandinavian Furn. 16705 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Charles A. Burgeson Attorney -at -Law 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 407 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dave Warner Insurance 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 506 Tukwila, WA 98188 Michael Ditchik, Attorney 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 405 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dynamic Computing Service:. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 405 Tukwila, WA 98188 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Merrick D. Lentz, Architect, has filed application to build an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant located at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, adjacent to the Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel. Permits applied for include: • Design Review • Environmental SEPA Other known required permits include: • Building Permit • Sign Permit Studies required with the application include: • Traffic Study • Drainage Study Files < Avails llefo`r eviev The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view these files, you,may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100. Project files include: • L97 -0017 (Design Review) • • E97 -0006 (Environmental SEPA) O' run t es for Pub`I 'Co tnni. en The public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, has been SCHEDULED FOR MAY 22, 1997 AT 7:00 P.M. To confirm the time and date, call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information, call Alexa Berlow at 431 -3673, or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 -5:00 p.m. Application Filed: March 14, 1997 Notice of Completeness issued: April 15, 1997 Notice of Application issued: April 25, 1997 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared May 15, 1997 HEARING DATE: May 22, 1997 NOTIFICATION: On April 24, 1997, the applicant posted a notice board on the site and a Notice of Application was issued and mailed. On May 14, 1997, staff mailed a Notice of Hearing to surrounding property owners and to the Seattle Times. PROJECT: L97 -0017 - Design Review APPLICANT: Merrick D. Lentz, Architect OWNER: Outback Steakhouse REQUEST: Design review approval to build an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant and associated landscaping. ASSOCIATED PERMITS: Building Permit Sign Permit Utility Permit LOCATION: 16500 Southcenter Parkway on an existing asphalt -paved parking area currently used by Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel LOT SIZE: Restaurant is 6,302 square feet of 68,000 square foot total parking pad 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 , - z mow; ILI J U: 0O N 0 cnw. w= J w.0i D. w z; 1--o z '2 Di. 0 vi ;0 I=5 w v ;w Z`' co( ,0 ~'. z Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: Tukwila Urban Center Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) was issued on May 14, 1997 Alexa Berlow, Associate Planner A. Set of Full -Size Plans B. Applicant's Design Review Cheklist C. Letter from adjacent business owner D. Color and Materials Board * E. Photographs of Site * F. Presentation Boards * * To be presented at the hearing. Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct an Outback Steakhouse, consisting of a 6,302 square foot one -story building on an existing asphalt -paved pad in a parking area currently used by Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel. The site will landscaped with trees, shrubs, and grass. Surrounding Land Uses: Retail and office facilities surround the proposed restaurant site, including an office complex to the north and a variety of retail commercial to the south and east, as well as across Southcenter Parkway to the west. Existing Development: The Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel currently occupies a portion of the site. The remainder of the property consists of a parking area, a portion of which will be leased to Outback Steakhouse. Access is provided by one of two driveways off Southcenter Parkway and by an easement to Strander Boulevard. Vegetation: Trees currently exist on parking lot median strips. BACKGROUND If the applicant is leasing property from Doubletree Guest Suites Hotel, a Binding Site Improvement Plan will be necessary as part of the Type II permit process. Should the property be purchased, the applicant will be required to file for a shortplat. The Police Department made numerous recommendations to augment security and reduce crime on the site. These have been forwarded to the applicant for consideration. ,..� 3 re 2 6D •J U 00 N .0 . W w 0. g u. CO ei I— al zF.. �0 z� w al 0 01 co; w w uiz` O z Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse DECISION CRITERIA Design approval by the Board of Architectural Review is required for commercial structures exceeding 10,000 square feet in the Tukwila Urban Center District, pursuant to TMC 18.60.030. The applicant's response to criteria of these conditions is contained in Attachment B. 18.60.050 General Review Criteria z i �: r4w . -J0 00 ! co CIi rn w La J H; (1). Relationship of Structure to Site. w` w a a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; QQ J u<: y The proposed restaurant and associated landscaping is proposed for an area that is _ d - now predominantly asphalt. It is intended to reduce the impact of large expanses of t- i z 1—, pavement and introduce provisions for pedestrian circulation and vegetation. 1— 0 z F-• w w b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the 2 D; visual impact of large paved areas; 0 CI •. N3 'O — O H The restaurant building will be sited on 53 excess parking spaces in the Doubletree w w Guest Suite Hotel parking lot, which currently totals 445 spaces. With the 1- �? redevelopment, the proposed parking will be: - O. w z 0 N Hotel 221 (1 space per room) ~O Hotel Restaurant and meeting rms. 107 z Outback Rest. 65 Total proposed parking capacity 393 c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. The proposed restaurant will be one -story with a maximum height of 22 feet 10 inches at the highest ridge. It is intended to be of similar scale to the Magnolia Hi -Fi building immediately to the south and to be a good transition in scale between those utilizing the streetfront, either on foot or in vehicles, and the office complex and eight -story hotel building to the north and east. 4 Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse (2). Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; The proposed design is similar in mass to commercial buildings to the south in the Parkway Square plaza, and separated from adjacent larger buildings to be easily distinguished from other retail buildings, adding variety to the retail landscape along Southcenter Parkway. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; A landscape plan consisting of existing and new planting is incorporated into this building proposal, including an existing landscape strip to be retained along the property line separating the new restaurant from other uses to the south. Existing landscaping within the parking area not impacted by the new restaurant will remain. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character; Not Applicable d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; Pedestrian linkages and transitions between'the street and restaurant, and from the parking area to the restaurant have been provided. The new building has been sited in such a way as to avoid major revisions to the existing traffic flow. Loading facilities for the restaurant are scheduled to occur during off -peak hours in order to lessen impacts on the area in the immediate vicinity of the restaurant. Extra space in the overflow parking area for the hotel (see discussion of parking in Item lb) may be used to facilitate loading functions, but will not impact the existing vehicular or pedestrian circulation conditions. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Three (3) existing driveways, two (2) to Southcenter parkway and one by easement access to Strander Boulevard will be retained without modification. Therefore, the site circulation system will remain unchanged. z Z 6 U: UO: CO W Z' J H • CO u-. WO u- _. • a. I- Ili or— II- I— 0 Z 1- 111 uj 0 o � W'. H U , z` ILI tr. 0 H'. z. Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse (3). Landscaping and Site Treatment. a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; z The current site will be augmented with additional trees, shrubs, and grass. Pathways, revised parking, and lighting accents will also be added. The existing w landscaping in the front yard is 10 feet wide, while the TUC requirement is 15 6 u � D D. feet wide for that front yard landscaping. -1 0 1 NC b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and w w �Pa g P , P P fh' z, provide an inviting and stable appearance; 1- w0 New walkways will be built at a slope of less than 1:20 and all revised areas of 2 parking will be built to a slope of less than 5 %, with the exception of new g 5 u.. a accessible parking spaces which will be sloped a maximum of 2 %. Areas of 52 a; high pedestrian use such as the entrance of the restaurant and along the walkway Z i to the hotel will remain virtually flat to facilitate ease of pedestrian and F- handicap accessible movement in the area. z O W c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important U 0' axis, and provide shade; '0 N 0 I-`. The new planting proposed around the building and in the parking area, along = v '- _ with roof overhangs provided by details of the proposed building design will u- p provide adequate shading for the immediate vicinity of the new development. w z: co Planting will serve to enhance the new building, provide base screening, as well v as visual enhancement to various facades around the structure. The new O 1" z walkway connections between the hotel and the street will be accentuated with planting. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; Planting areas are protected from vehicular traffic by the walkways and extruded curbs. In addition, circulation paths are designed to provide traffic flow in a manner discourage or eliminate short cuts through planting. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged; Planting around the building has been enhanced to mitigate a streetfront planting strip which is narrower than required for new developments, due to boundary limits of lease agreement. Therefore, the existing front planting strip will remain and additional planting will be concentrated around the building and adjacent parking. 6 .+ .. .rvr.1M ate, wr.or. n.u4WMitt rn�«w�ry rrtit :arxs�s wrMwon,.rn mi i�' , Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; The service yard is screened by a six -foot solid concrete block wall and slatted z fencing is added to further screen the main gate access. Oversized planting with :.1 i year -round screen planting will be provided for each side of the enclosure. re 2; 6D g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and 0 0 pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; ; w 0 w W =: It has been determined that planting will provide a suitable improvement for the N u designated areas of the site. w O.: h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- u scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the N B building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive I— W brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Z 1-, ' E- 0, Parking lot lighting will be the same as currently provided in the parking area, 111 ui which is intended to allow for a soft but effective light pattern. Building D 0 mounted lighting will provide safe and secure lighting for pedestrian traffic. The O -:. 0 t-, intent of lighting is to provide secure passages for customers to the restaurant, w for guests from the hotel, and to provide the least amount of impact to traffic 1- v. and surrounding businesses. u- r— El z (4). Building Design. 0 = a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality � 0 of its design and relationship to its surroundings; Z. Outback Steakhouse, Inc. proposed a building design quite different from those in the surrounding vicinity, that accentuates a ranch theme through the application of a highly modulated yet low -scale structure, materials, and color. The front facade includes a covered porch, wood siding indigenous of the northwest proposed to be painted a light color, and a soft green metal roof extending down to create wide overhangs. The barn-like quality of the design also reflects the overall atmosphere of the restaurant. In addition, the porch extends along the north side of the building to provide covered access between the restaurant and the hotel. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; The single -story structure proposed provides continuity with adjacent buildings to the south, all single story with an orientation to the street, and as a transition from the pedestrian scale at the street level and restaurant entrance to the eight - story hotel to the east. 7 .... ___...*"11..fro.,... P MOVS,Z -.n Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; Windows and doors have been designed to provide a proportional relationship to the overall building. Windows are balanced across the front facade and relate w rt to the gables and are intended to relate to the north and south sides of the building. The main access points for the building are the double front doors and _10 UO; a door on the east side of the building leading to the kitchen. Doors on the north cn o co w and south sides of the building are emergency exits, placed to comply with w existing requirements of the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Doors are trimmed u_ to match the building trim and include porch lights as additional accents. w O d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; LL ¢. HW The colors proposed for the new building are a muted light gray for the body, white on the trim, front railings, and columns, natural stained wood doors, and a ? !- soft green metal roofing as well as on the mansards and gables. A single tube of z g uj red neon tracing the mansard eve are proposed to line to gables as an accent 2 D color. This accent will be effective during evening hours only, from dusk until cDi u) the restaurant closes at midnight. = ;moo —_' w w: e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be 1- V-- screened from view; O: LLI Z All mechanical equipment will be located on the roof of the structure. The mansards in the roof design will screen equipment from street -level view. Any 01— equipment required to be located on the ground, such as electrical transformers, will be screened with landscaping. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design; g. Exterior lighting is proposed to provide downlight on the walkways and around the building. Decorative porch lights will be located over the public doors, and existing parking lot lighting poles will remain. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The use of gables on each side of the building, as well as porch railings and columns on the front and north sides of the building modulate the building design in a manner that prevents the adverse effects of monotonous or repetitive detail. Landscaping has also been designed to complement the structural design. 8 Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse (5). Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale; Benches are proposed for the entrance of the restaurant as exterior furniture, both to accentuate the front porch of the building as a gathering place and focal point of the site for pedestrians, and to provide an additional waiting area out - of- doors. The wall signage is shown on the west elevation of Attachment A. The Sign Code mould permit a wall sign of 57 square feet, the applicant is proposing a sign of 53 square feet. b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. The entry to the restaurant, as described above, will be lit by overhead soffit lighting to accentuate it as the focal point of the site and provide further lighting for guests who may be waiting in the area. CONCLUSIONS DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES 1. Relationship of Structure to Site The size of the proposed building is modest in relation to the size of the site and the existing hotel. Overall, traffic flow , pedestrian access and circulation on the site work well. However, a better defined connection is needed between the hotel and the restaurant. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area The proposed design is similar in mass to commercial buildings to the south in the Parkway Square Plaza. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment As noted in the discussion, the front yard landscaping is 5 feet narrower than the code minimum. The BAR may modify the standards imposed by the zoning code when, in their judgment , the existing and proposed additional landscaping and screening materials together will adequately screen or buffer possible use incompatibilities, soften the barren appearance of parking or storage areas, and/or adequately enhance the premises appropriate to the use district and location of the site. 9 aD . - fftSSV�r�w+�w =H` UO CO CI; W I •w 0° ga. - d. • Z to F- _. I- 0: zi-: ui UE • •w w: Z, • • tii =E .0 H'. z Staff report to the L97 -0017 Board of Architectural Review Outback Steakhouse Staff does not recommend requiring the applicant to increase the front yard to the minimum 15 feet width. Given the existing condition of landscaping and the proposed site development, staff believes that for the most part, the site plan does a good job in screening and softening the appearance of the parking lot. There is opportunity for improvement however in the existing landscaping areas along the west and north elevations of the proposed restaurant. Additional trees could be planted in these locations to further soften the appearance of parking and the building. 4. Building Design The proposed building is well designed and makes use of color changes, and entrance detailing. The barn-like quality of the design reflects the overall atmosphere of the restaurant. All mechanical equipment will be located on the roof and screened by the mansards in the roof design. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture The proposed signage is in scale with the facades and is in harmony with the building. RECOMMENDATIONS The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the proposed project with the conditions, as follows: 1. Add a clearly marked pedestrian pathway between the restaurant and the hotel. 2. Add two trees on the west elevation front entrance and two trees on the north elevation entrance. %�{rnw.nwcR0�1��(ti 10 Or. +., .......w .-, ..+.n,,o4..1 %kK`i'. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development May 13, 1997 Debbie Marlow Marlow's Fine Jewelry, Inc. 16876 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Ms. Marlow: John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Your letter. received April 29, 1997 regarding concerns about the development of Outback Steakhouse was forwarded to me as the planner in charge of the project. I relayed your concerns to appropriate city departments and have the following information to share with you in response to them. Basic development standards for each zoning district outlined in the Tukwila Municipal Code regulate minimum parking spaces based on the type of business and square footage of the building. Minimum parking requirements for the Outback Steakhouse is one space for every 100 square feet of building, for a total of 63 spaces based on a 6,302 square foot building. For businesses that share parking, minimum requirements for each business must still be met. In 1994, a parking study of this area was conducted by the City's Department of Community Development. At that time, the Doubletree Hotel had 456 stalls, 161 of which were vacant. Currently parking counts on the Doubletree property continue to support findings from this study, therefore, minimum parking requirements on the property at 16500 Southcenter Boulevard are met and concur with current parking assessments. The City encourages businesses to share parking whenever possible, particularly on large lots where demands will stagger throughout the day. Outback Steakhouse has submitted a Traffic Report indicating peak travel times anticipated by the restaurant. According to the analysis, traffic impacts are expected to be low due to peak hour demands arriving much later in the day than peak traffic volumes of the street system. Outback Steakhouse anticipates that most of its clientele will be between the hours of 4pm and midnight; Experience has shown the noon hour to be the highest travel period. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax. (206) 431-3665 z• i � F. w ' 6 • 0O' N 0; tow: W =: .0 LL: W • LL Q �a 1 w. =; Z • Z ALI w; D 0: :0 H' ;W w.. • w z. U OF- z Outback Steakhouse L97 -0017 Page 2 As far as signage for your jewelry business is concerned, you may address specific permanent sign questions directly to Michael Jenkins, who can be reached at 4313685. If you have any other questions or to express any further concerns I encourage you to attend the public hearing for the Outback Steakhouse proposal on Thursday, May 22, 1997, beginning at 7pm. Your letter will be provided to the Board of Architectural Review for review before the hearing. You will receive confirmation of the hearing by mail within the next few days. If you would like to review project files (File # L97 -0017 and E97- 0006), please feel free to call me directly at 431 -3673. Sincerely, OLOA,cat, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner cc.: Rick Lentz, Merrick Lentz Architects HI-Z'. CC 2LLI'; Ow oW W W o, 1 Nom; i• I- w z � Dos 'O H. u.a - z` U - Z. A F F I D A V I T 5 \i 01 A Mc1NI:i-1- Notice of Public Hearing fl Notice of Public Meeting Board of Packet Board of Packet Planning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda 0 Short Subdivision .genda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LIShoreline Management Permit was 1 ed to each of the following O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: ODetermination of Non - significance LJ Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ODetermination of Significance and Scoping-Notice Li Notice of Action Official Notice n Other Other Oki2131-A t"),`21 Name of Project addresses on s--fl 9 Q - 7 Signature nature , r c. 1-261.4.1e1 al) M6 graPE-, Vii 'sAC.)C ST AiL110 S'S Ex 1,6A- I moo w 1 File Number Lc11.00 , - L - 0 011 - - ooIGI rweAm. z ne QQom; JU' UO W p; Uw WI N LL; W O: 2 co Ji =a I-W z 1- O: z D p: p wW H: Iii z'. fit. � O z. PUBLIC NOTICE City of Tukwila Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., on May 22, 1997; in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION L97 -0013 City of Tukwila Revisions to TMC 18.70, Non - Conforming Uses. City -Wide. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: L97 -0004: JC Penney Home Store APPLICANT: John Balkovec REQUEST: Design review approval of a new 60,000 sq. ft. furniture and housewares store. LOCATION: 17200 Southcenter Pkwy, Tukwila. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L97 -0017 Outback Steakhouse Design review of a 6,300 sq. ft. restaurant and landscaping. 16500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila. CASE NUMBER: L97 -0019 APPLICANT: Bonsai Northwest REQUEST: Design review of a 4,800 sq. ft. expansion of an existing greenhouse. LOCATION: 14427 51 Ave. S., Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement, or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division at 431 -3670. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times May 9, 1997 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. .,, �' r.',. �i}»: i:. in' ��'✓ i��,`- y: K�,''., �c�' itir c^ �?:: i7, �iitit' „r.�si2ii \: ? "s�'_ti'�= �ti�i:E:i `rad+°`-.'�75���xar ��«. -:.. z _I z • � w • oo 1 N °. U) L11 • AU :U) w_ u. wo 12 d • W: z I-.. • moo. .z �. w w: O• N` • ;° F- w 1 ---V` ' . u. F' U = N: o~ z 05/07/1997 10:24 2067477149 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT DATE: • TO: ATIN: FAX NO: SUBJECT: FROM: CMA Mtn U�-fr-(/�c 1')cW ILA Pd M '5410 A/ 431.35 LE1NSt z. MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 1800 - 136th Place N. E., Sulte 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: (206) 747 -3177 FAX: (206) 747.7149 PAGE 01 Mg. `lout?. C•EAZc F0r1 -r 1411"61. 5-- AC6 rz6rM S PIPE AS + buctus�> : / 1 / l try i�1N t Dc v ► ;:ci . 17„1•1>ty k1oW S lOutq 'T is tte fe t eraW EP U►S TM- PLAr1• Ate Gi p o% 5QuPQE. rver or Amt. FrU is oolhirTY Lotml4E Ace Goo FEu*14m /&Nr1 Ef ivMS Afott 1R3o2e 'r 41, 1od (341. of -form-) '55 s>r (3./1- of -ftr -) i . rt/Id CAA 6 s . -(ix ziw 1- - Ct.( (' ti 0 G 1-'1 c .G1 u-J - r� i,, ca. ckal,,_41.-,----. \-1) -\--ki- 1-- vvv-,-1- t ct 2-4-,-7 (c-t'-- —15 Si. f'R%.": 'iIK 44:04 4' PAGE 1 OF PAGES. .Z .H Z • ce W`. J V. 0O; W W' W. =. I—' W 0, 1L < N d. I--_` Z 1- 0 • Z I— O- '0 H•. W W' ta- p _ Z, iIJ O- Z ICS 1�61/1- Atia.c1-c- 9 - Marrow's Fine Jewerry, Inc. 'Specializing in t/ie 2lnique' 1:0 G RECEIVED APR 2 9 1997 DEVELOPMENT (ac v! /42 _.,(-- _J Q- 1/'/I-P Ot!%N elm, MA4/49-r Pike- l v Z-rt- AVX /1-71 di-- PA/%gi9-fr-tru44 71& 6874-dff--A_ . .41L -.7e-a-14-(;0 -fir-e- 5:7(rh,t-e' 50-14. P G`s ceiviore,- av-ref. v-t9w66_‘12 fL-4=,--- 5as / ./.4at/ze, ' sks-ta geDii Q e/1 .4A41 ve-ce-r7 eba-7t.,wei-L_ t ift-a(--au V4‘z-71 6�� s)Y /1/2Z-4 -- n-e- s 16876 Southcenter Parkway • Tukwila, WA 98188 • (206) 575 -9852 • Fax: (206) 7q-t-( s.NS, s�4 i1 s. hu rz 5 ;5 ti%t tdfitofiA.4 .. ing 575 -40 57 ATTACHMENT C--� Marrow's Fine jewel- y,� ' • peciczfzzing in t/ie 'Unique' gorAk> c� pLa- J dZ6/2_ 6 / RECEIVED APR 2 9 1997 COMMUNITY l.-.. /ELOPMENT kif " ae_4_ cx(.. �--v-)t_d � ctaU r---6- &ZP/71-e4A- ci/kle ec-044- dot. /4,/,/;( uz-7_ sdwLterkik_ 4d-d). � pa4 J ,4)1-4di 6f),(4e, at'PLI crt/ipe70- ,(1\AA,c0„. gid_eiyoe 6// 16876 Southcenter Parkway • Tukwila, WA 98188 • (206) 575 -9852 • Fax: (206) 575 -4057 I, O Notice of Public Hearing L Notice of Public Meeting A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N 5 \011 A `C/ V A4-1 -* " hereby declare that: O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet fl Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Li Shoreline Management Permit fl Determination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Action ❑ Official Notice Other 14Tic. or fc P Poc.A_ 0 Other Cs -- 1E- was mailed to each of the following addresses on /WACb fEET� Name of Pro ] ect O I 3AC — 5I iAk- 4L 1gnature c File Number 1.-61-1' D©11 {Y- ,t:. . :ki i ;'Y SaY: i:. ��' n+ k'ra?tiva�Xia�l�iiiPWi�iSSU'`K;4 uti�.,i ?r4�:' ? & cii+.# �Y' �,. i�:: s'.± t�; JS�'?£". v7ri •sitd?�`Y�a'ti�:Yi",i +;..fi�..v CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION. Merrick Lentz Architect has filed an application to develop an Outback Steakhouse, a 6,300 square foot restaurant with associated landscaping, adjacent to the Doubletree Guest Suites, to be located at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, Washington. Permits applied include: • Design Review • SEPA and environmental checklist • Sign Permit Other known required permits include: • Building Permit • Utility Permit Studies required with the applications include: • Traffic Report FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW:; The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard , Suite 100. Project Files include: • Design Review (L97 -0017) • SEPA (E97 -0006) OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT . . Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., May 5, 1997. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at431 -3670. Design Review Permit -- Type 4 - City Council For further information on this proposal, contact Alexa Berlow at 431 -3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: March 14, 1997 Notice of Completeness Issued: April 15, 1997 Notice of Application Issued: April 24, 1997 fx%s::suFtiY' tips., us7eLi7�L' ��" 1a�3hi� 'k <Y.:s- 'a�f;}Ha�'usiNS;nGa v:�i'.+rdw<3� z 1 re W; tin -0 OOH wW N WO ga 2 d. I- W. Z p: Z I-,. C-1 N' 1- WW H 1'. Z: ur tt 0�'-' z 1 1:c . fit; •• 'f ' i ,•. •• .. .S 262304-9005-05 DAYTON HUDSON CORP 951249 C/0 PROPERTY TAX DEPT 777 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 262304-9021-05 SUNRAY. INVESTMENTS 432306 C/O METROMARK INVESTMENT MN 14335 NE 24TH ST ;202 BELLEVUE WA 98007 262304-9076 -09 FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC 260318 ATTN: TAX , DEPARTMENT - SHF 7 W 7TH ST CINCINNATI OH 45202 262304- 9102-07 FANA CORPORATION 6051 S-194TH STREET KENT WA 262304- 9104 -05 CHEVRON SERVICES CO PROPERTY.TAX DEPT PO BOX 285 HOUSTON TX 569999 98031 650775 77001 .262304-9004-06 SOUTHCENTER JOI T VENTUR ATTN: JAMES RIDGE RD 25425 CENTER CLEVELAND OH L4(L i >r 262304- 912.8-07 CAPTIAL COUNTIES USA INC 361132 101 CAL1vORNIA ST SUITE 2525 SAN FRANCISCO CA. 94111 262304-9141 -00 • SCHOFIELD ROBERT HCLESLIE M150386 4212 HUNTS POINT RD BELELVUE WA 98004 537920-0241 -07 DOUBLETREE INN 420463 C/O POER MARVIN F & COMPANY 500 108TH AVE NE ;780 BELLEVUE WA 98004 537920-0282 -07 REDLEY ENTERPRISES INC 430007 13635 BEL -RED RI) BELLEVUE WA 98005 537920 - 0290-07 ARGUS'GROUP LTD 6N1695 IVERSON 'IR.VIN 320 108TH AVE NE V406 BELLEVUE WA' 98004 537920- 0300 -05 SIZZLING PLATTER OF WASH 481012 348 EAST 6400 SOUTH V200• MURRAY UT 84107 537920- 0310 -03 SKARBO PETER R C0580 16705 SOUTH CENTER PARKWAY SEATTLE WA 98188 537920-0315-08 PUGET SOUND POWER 4; LIGHT C241709 PROPERTY TAXES PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 Zttia'a:bs"' '.f` df'€151eAciii tifirotX tii`. Plki ea'; z; •J O • • ,0 •cn w= J H: Nw. w O, w ¢ I-_ F- CY. ZI • U� • =V' • ALP' 0; • w Z:' • z. Cheryl Graves • 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 205 Tukwila, WA 98188 Hallmark Mortgage 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 208 Tukwila, WA 98188 Joel Roy & Assoc. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 404 !Tukwila, WA 98188 J. William. Larson & Co. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 306• Tukwila, WA 98188 Kits Camera 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 301 Tukwila, WA 98188 Renae Kxlapp Color Inst. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 307 Tukwila, WA 98188 LPL Tebhnical Services 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 510 • Tukwila, WA 98188 Merrill Schultz & Assoc. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 300 'Tukwila, WA 98188 ;'Metropolitan Home Mortgage 116400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 308 ;Tukwila, WA 98188 Metropolitan Life j6400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 410 . ;Tukwila, WA .98188 ,: ^.:"..tG.fi:tT • Fni, 1, ye�iiu`, .s";.Y`f ?r.:�;aga",�.+r.}; ?r't Onsite Energy Corp. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 204 Tukwila, WA 98188 Parkway Dental Care 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 102 Tukwila, WA 98188 Retirement Solutions 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 510 Tukwila, WA 98188 Riviera Finance' 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 305 Tukwila, WA 98188 Law Office of Michael Riley 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 205 Tukwila, WA 98188 Rodrigo Int'l'Commodities 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 504 Tukwila, WA 98188 • Alan McSurger, Attorney 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 407 Tukwila, WA 98188 S.W. King Co. Chamber of Commerce 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 210 Tukwila, WA 98188 Volt Services Group 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 201 Tukwila, WA 98188 Lawrence S. Wallach, PS 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 408 Tukwila, WA 98188 GI.fS,l'.i�". Wash. St. Republican Part 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 200 Tukwila, WA 98188 Chevron 220 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Camera's West 235 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 .Target 301 Strander Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 z 0 0' N w: L1.1 =: • wO ga LL on a =a w F- _ :z �...: Z O- :0 • �. -; off; W 'Li • • W z'. • en; O z Magnolia Hi Fi 16600 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Toys R Us . 16700 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Fast Signs 16870 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Pak Mail 16864 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 China Coin 16860 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Miyabi Japanese Restaurant Black Tie 16820 Southcenter Prkwy. 16854 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Tukwila, WA 98188 Half Price Books 16828. Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Futon Gallery Furniture 16830 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Houlihan's Hiring 16890 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwi1 &, WA 98188 Econopage 16880 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Marlow's Fine Jewelry 16876 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Southcenter Nails 16874 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Houlihan's 16850 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Magnolia Hi Fi Installation Center 16832 Southcenter Prkwy. . Tukwila, WA 98188 McDonald's Rest. Southcntr 16501 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sizzler Restaurant 16615 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sees Candies, Inc'. 16425 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Skarbos Scandinavian Furn. 16705 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 gifraatitztviatiaggak Southcenter Flower Market 16415 Southcenter Prkwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 Southcenter Cosmetic Surg. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 101 Tukwila, WA 98188 Adams Temporaries 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 400 Tukwila, WA 98188 Applied Systems 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 501 Tukwila, WA 98188 Ashton Corp. 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 502 Tukwila, WA 98188 C.B. Comm. Real Estate 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Charles A. Burgeson Attorney -at -Law 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 407 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dave Warner Insurance 16400 Southcenter•Prkwy. Suite 506 Tukwila, WA 98188 Michael Ditchik, Attorney 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 405 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dynamic Computing Services 16400 Southcenter Prkwy. Suite 405 Tukwila, WA 98188 z iz. re 2 J U' U O•. w co w w =. co u. w 0:. • D a ZI-' 1- 0; Z 0 0 W W • U ▪ p. w Z. O ~. Z CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 l IWC` 11--- 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I liketocK. n . 1,19.11 Y- (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on faCl" A L 24 . I `1`11 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 1000 5OUTHC.ENTEQ 8L /D so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number L11- 00I7/0c11-000( ;474.k..4` Affiant (Applicant Signaat • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this (A"'``day of_, 19 97 7ecl. NOT PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at r My commission xpires on r 1• —� / RECEIVED , 4 ata (tr nk-. it �/lHn yq • I An 5evj APR 2 4 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT z z re ▪ al2 �_ J0. U O; i N 0 N w: W =. • u,, w 0' co =' 1-w z�:. I— 0' Z I- O N' w w` U! 11. to z UN P- 0 April 15, 1997 .P12, City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Application for Design Review (L97 -0017) Application for SEPA Determination (E97 -0006) Outback Steakhouse, 16500 Southcenter Boulevard adjacent to Doubletree Suites Hotel Dear Mr. Lentz: Your application to build an Outback Steakhouse Eit 16500 Southcenter Parkway, adjacent to the existing Doubletree Suites Hotel, has been found complete on April 14, 1997. The applications have been assigned to me and tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on May 22, 1997. By May 9, 1997, you must install a notice board on the site. A notice of complete application form will be laminated by the Department of Community Development who will notify you when it is ready to be picked up to post on the board. A copy of information on how to install the board and laminated notice is included with this letter. After installing the sign and the laminated notice, you must return a signed Affidavit of Posting to me. You will be responsible for removing the notice board from the site once your application has been approved and finalized, and all public notice periods have terminated. This determination of Complete Application does not preclude the City to request revisions to your proposal to insure that it meets the substantive requirements of the zoning code and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Your application will be routed to appropertiate departments for internal review, and any revision comments made back to you within 21 days of this notice. If you have any questions about this notice or if you wish to speak to me about other issues sooner than our response date, please feel free to contact me directly at 431 -3673. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments encl. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 «itt ti �', =��t3. tit:; ".:'• °:.5.1:.a:}c.,. ?".;TM. ; 'RXut.1':wi .SK:C.goo, 74N1kka$4tlp•: :;�,i �is�fF ;rS: tr &xl#N. r MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT z DESIGN CRI RIA FOR OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE RESTAURANT Q 1-z. 16500 Southcenter Parkway - Tukwila, Washington o: u _Jo 0 0' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ' 2 N w° w: This proposed project includes construction of a new single story restaurant, new landscaping -I i and revisions to existing parking on the parcel of land owned by the Doubletree Corporation. The `a p building would be built on land to the west of the existing Doubletree Guest Suites hotel, and will be 2 the second structure on the property, as opposed to creating a separated building lot. Care has been g LL taken to comply with the development requirements of the city while respecting the existing co d conditions of the site and the potential impacts of the work on the hotel. I w' Z 1.-.. DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES: f- O zI A. Relationship of Structure to Site: tu w 1. This site will ' reduce the impact of a large expanse of existing pavement by 0 o introducing a new building with pedestrian circulation provisions and new o 5 landscape areas into an area that is now predominately asphalt. w w 1— v, 2. The parking areas are designed to fit into the existing circulation pattern on the p site while introducing new landscaping that enhances the, portion of site being Cu developed. The planned service yard is screened with solid walls, screened gates P and significant planting to minimize its presence to both the new restaurant z building as well as the existing multi -story hotel building. 3. The new restaurant building will be single -story with a maximum height of only 22' -10" at the highest ridge. This will provide a good transition in scale between those utilizing the street frontage, either on foot or in vehicles, and the eight -story hotel building to the east of the building area. This building is similar in scale to the Magnolia Hi -Fi building immediately to the south, which provides a relatively similar presentation to the street. B. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area: 1. The Outback building is separated from adjacent buildings by enough distance to be able to avoid being confused as an extension of the existing retail environment. This should be an advantage to the city by creating some variety in the retail streetscape while maintaining a presence as a single -story use compatible in massing to the neighboring buildings along the Para RECEIVED ATTACHMENT B MAR 1 4 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1800 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 206/747 -3177 • FAX 206/747 -7149 :•: r. 4ri.' nk+ i,> yz• �''.'�ifi+�Y�i..O1"�.'t�r''ia'F YLi4+iSia:;i.Y;,�1 ': %N "til4^Ya'.'S`r�'�i 2. An existing landscaped planting strip will be retained along the property line separating this new use from the existing ones to the south. Also, existing landscaping within the surrounding parking lot not impacted by the new restaurant will remain. 3: This is a well- established retail area of the city. This building will blend well with the improvements already built in the vicinity of the site. z 1w 4. The existing parking lot allows for good vehicular circulation within its -J o boundaries. Care has been taken to site the new building in such a way to avoid co major revisions to the traffic flow. In addition to providing pedestrian linkage co between. the street and the restaurant, this pathway also extends to the hotel cn w. building, .providing a new linkage that heretofore was missing. Loading functions w O for the restaurant occur during off -hour times, and therefore do not impact the g area in the immediate vicinity of the restaurant. Since this area is basically an Li. a: overflow parking area for the hotel, loading functions around the restaurant should = d have no discernable impact. F- i ? 5. Existing driveways, two to Southcenter Parkway and one by easement access to w o Strander Boulevard, have been specifically retained to avoid restructuring of the 2 total site circulation system. All three access points are proposed to remain v N. without modification.. o ww Lj--O .z. w U= 0 z C. Landscape & Site Treatment: 1. The current site is fully improved. Walkways and pedestrian areas will be blended into the existing topography to avoid abrupt . or unnatural transitions between elements. 2. New walkways will be built at a slope of less than 1:20. All revised parking areas should be able to be built to a slope of less than 5 %, with the exception of the new accessible parking spaces, which will be sloped a maximum of 2 %. Pedestrian gathering areas in front of the building will be virtually flat to encourage people to congregate in these spots. 3. The new planting proposed, along with the roof overhangs provided by the structure, will provide adequate shading for the immediate vicinity of the new development. Planting will enhance the building, providing base screening and visual enhancement to various facades around the structure. The new walkway connection between the hotel and the street will be planted to accentuate the pathway and provide a comfortable environment. 4. Planting areas are protected from vehicular traffic by a system of walkways and extruded curbs. The circulation path is designed to provide traffic flow in the most logical and direct manner, so that short-cuts through planted areas are minimized or eliminated: uY 5. A pleasing mix of building- enhancing landscaping and parking area planting is proposed as the solution to required planting areas for this site. The building planting is enhanced to mitigate the streetfront planting strip, which is narrower than required for new development. The proposed mitigation of providing more landscaping than required around the building is offered to allow the front planting strip to remain, and therefore avoid major disruption to the on -site circulation and parking systems. 6. The service yard is screened by a six -foot solid concrete block wall and slatted fencing to screen the main gate access. In addition, oversized planting areas with year -round screen planting will be provided for each side of the enclosure. 7. It is proposed that planting will be a suitable improvement for the designated areas on the site. Other types of site improvements will probably not be needed to provide effective and attractive site improvement solutions. 8. Parking lot lighting will be the same as currently provided in the parking area, which allows for a soft but effective lighting pattern throughout the lot. In addition, building- mounted lighting will provide safe and secure light for the pedestrian traffic that will occur around this use. In all cases, the lighting is intended to provide secure passage for the guests, and will not impact traffic or surrounding properties. D. Building Design: 1. Outback Steakhouse, Inc. utilizes a building design intended to accentuate the friendly atmosphere that is a major component of their dining experience. The front facade includes a covered porch that provides protection from the elements and defines a place that is inviting to visitors. The wood siding is indigenous to the northwest, and the light color adds to the overall atmosphere of the restaurant. The porch extends across the front of the building and along the north side, to provide covered access to the guests coming from the north parking area or the Doubletree Guest Suites. 2. The single story structure proposed provides a transition from the pedestrian scale at the street to the eight -story hotel building to the east of the pad. Adjacent buildings to the south are also single -story with the similar orientation to the street frontage. 3.. Windows and doors, while needing to coordinate specifically with the interior layout of the building, still have a proportionate relationship on the building exterior. Windows are balanced across the front facade, and relate to the gables on the . north and south sides of the building. The main access points for the building are the double front doors and the kitchen access door on the east elevation. The doors on the north and south sides are emergency exits and are placed to comply with the exiting requirements of the building code. They are trimmed to match the building trim and include porchlights as additional accent over the door. 4. The building colors will be a muted light grey body, white on the trim, front railings and columns, natural stained wood doors, and an aged copper metal roofing on the mansards and gables. There are no bright or brilliant colors as part of the building finish treatment. Color accent will be provided by a single tube of red neon tracing the mansard eave line and the gables. This will be effective during the evening hours from dusk until the restaurant's closing at midnight. 5. The mechanical equipment will be located on the roof of the structure. The design of the mansards will screen this equipment from all ground- related traffic, either pedestrian or vehicular. Any equipment required to be located on the ground, such as electrical transformers and the like, will be screened with landscaping to conceal their presence. 6. Exterior lighting is provided in the overhanging soffit around the building, which provides downlight on the walking surfaces around the building. The downlight will not be invasive to the guests of the hotel, which is the main use in the immediate area that requires sensitivity in lighting placement and direction. The other area of attention will be the streetfront so that glare does not distract passing drivers. Other sources of light will be the decorative porchlights over the public doors around the building, and the parking lot lighting, most of which is existing and will not be disturbed. 7. The building facade prevents adverse affects of monotonous or repetitive detail by the use of the gables on each side as well as the use of the porch railings and columns on the front and north sides. In addition on this particular site, building - related landscaping will accent and complement the structure. E. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: 1. Because this use has, a destination focus, the exterior furniture is located at the front entrance of the building. There will be benches provided on each side of the front entry, which serve to accentuate the feeling of the "front porch" as well as to provide a location for guests to wait while their table is being readied. 2. The front area is the focused location of exterior furniture, and will be lit by overhead soffit lighting as the primary source of illumination. Commercial Area Design Review Policy: This project will be new construction complying with the latest technology in methods and materials to insure a quality product. The presence of the structure is softened by landscaping surrounding the building on all sides, as well as additional accent planting in the existing parking area surrounding the site. The site provides • miatAtl gii,v;1[m41+ t6.00irimr•'. .'cli�ft rye i °.Attilafte.r. z w -jU U 00 co J CO L w 0 u- < u_= D. a _, z1— I— O;. Z �. uj co U� 0 I— w w. ui U= 0 I- z pedestrian access from all points within the surrounding parking areas as well as a direct connection to the sidewalk paralleling the street. The existing traffic circulation pattern is organized and efficient - the major pedestrian access from the street across the interior traffic lane will be well- marked and adequately lighted. The newly landscaped areas, as well as the building itself, will be well- maintained to continue to present a quality dining experience for all guests. Tukwila Urban Center Policy: 1. The existing parking and circulation system on the property already interconnects with the adjacent property to the north. Grade changes and circulation conflicts would make any potential connection to the south impractical. 2. This site is not adjacent to a park or recreation area. 3. This project is appropriate in scale and proportion to accentuate pedestrian and vehicular relationships. The building is oriented toward the street and provides convenient pedestrian access to the restaurant as well as to the hotel building to the east. The facade is modulated in the front and utilizes gables on the roof overhang to add interest to the elevations. The landscaping will be properly installed and maintained to achieve an appropriate appearance. The siting of the building is sensitive to the surrounding property uses. and avoids disruption of existing circulation patterns. The parcel of land abuts the Tukwila Pond, but the area of influence of improvement activity of the restaurant does not allow any improvements or impacts to the pond. 4.The parking areas for this project are already existing. Landscaping enhancement is being proposed for the areas required to support the restaurant use. Existing planting areas west of the hotel building will be cleaned and enhanced as needed to achieve a desirable appearance. No new parking facilities are being constructed as part of this proposal - the current landscaping standards will be applied to all parking relocated or affected by the project. 5. Building design, pedestrian environment and safety and project orientation have been addressed above in comments on Design Review Guidelines. 6. This site does not impact open space planning of the city. Construction of the restaurant and the landscape improvements do reduce the impact of the large asphalted parking area currently existing west of the Doubletree Guest Suites. '.:' isli�>.' ti1iz' 4�, f3,' i.''.. v:�T.'.'.r; ".'D�7i7i;56iM1�`a "' ;: �F" �S {'�,l`bltiit'v��.�i�:%✓�.:�n' 39 v • • t . i7.61 . J 9th7 . Y$ t' . , ' �!4�f twav, Ait;4N4tta ' . '' yQ..hVt(d is rifit i CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Restrooms: Recommend that the restrooms that are open to the general public not have false ceilings. There have been problems with subjects hiding in the ceiling area and then dropping down later to do robberies. 2. Security Alarm: Recommend installing a security alarm system during construction that would report a robbery in progress as well as a burglary in progress when the business is closed. z z I- F- w VIS - 0 00 CD w` • J =. w0 3. Windows: Consideration should be given to providing hardened 22t coverings (such as security film, etc.) for ground level windows where glass breakage would allow for access to w building interiors by burglars. • m ▪ • Z f.. 4. Orientation of Windows: Windows should be located so that z O; the parking lot area can be easily surveyed by employees w w, inside the business. Also the windows should be located so that a patrol car passing by can easily survey inside the business. • 0 1.-' w W, S V; u. ~O, • 0• O z 5. Doors: Doors should have quality locking mechanisms with minimum one inch deadbolt locks. All exit doors shall be operable from the interior without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. The Crime Prevention Unit should be contacted for information regarding correct hardware usage at 242 -8084. 6. Graffiti Prevention Program: It is important to win the war against the graffiti "artist" and keep your building attractive for customers. New non -stick anti - graffiti water - based or wax like coatings are now available to make an effective barrier against graffiti or other potentially staining substances. Contact the crime prevention unit 242 - 8084. 7. Landscaping: Plant materials should be placed and maintained so to provide visibility and prohibit hiding places for unauthorized people around ground level door and window areas. Sticker shrubs may discourage crime activities. Low shrubs and umbrella trees (where the canopy is maintained above eight(8) feet from the ground) will allow surveillance opportunities, hence reducing the potential for criminal behavior. f>'1'.a' Ai <YrfcrhY� �"533%�' ":���•::?i �;;� tS(he" +3�i,<F j+A slt'e 4146 � 'sx.6;giN` '::1'e. m n`utsi'R:1dtgig,,640:....0 :: 04,1'427r ",4, . ' nom'. l�h\ 112' skik 8. Lighting: Energy efficient security lighting is a relatively low-cost, yet extremely effective way to protect your business. By providing sufficient lighting in the parking lot and around your building you will discourage burglars and vandals who don't like light, preferring the cover of darkness for their dirty work. Also the lighting will provide a legitimate sense of security for not only you, but your employees and customers. Checklist prepared by R. Abbott (242-6505) and T. Kilburg (242-8084) 4/30/97 ...1 • • • 1- t- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 0 t- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- t- t- t- U (.3 U 1- t- 1- t- 1- 1- - h 1•• 1- t- t- 1- 1- 1- )- h 1- 1- h 1- 1- ).- F- )- ).- 1 • ID VdD to 0 h N 0 0 0 w Z U) o ID O N N .• h 0) O N 10 M O M O O(O 0 0 10 d IO U) O 10 in a" " O U) O O 10 .- O h O O CO ID 01 N N N O ID O 0 0 0 0 IO O U) <D N 0 ID U) 0) CO N CO 1O At ID " CO M ID At IO h M r N CO M a U) II N d " 0) ID 0) d in h O •1 O At O CO N N CO M O O ID N .- et CO M N< C M < a C r t 01219AO0 1. CD ID N .- 0 0 0 3 (U Z 0 0 0 r 0 U) O ID O to N" h CO 0 O N ID N Of U) At O 0 ID O O in a 10 O ID h a" " 0 N U) 0 0 0 N " 0 0 Al M at 0) O N 0 ,unknown O M CO O U) ID a At M M N r ID a 10 r CO a N h At 0 M N M a U) U) CO d 0) ID 0) a In 1. 0 IO 0 O O O " M 10 O O IO h M" CO M N CO d '- eeJ b 3 O • CO ■ I ID N I e 1 356781, i 32313 4356001 d O ID N O U) CO ID O At N CO N cat h 0 O " /a) M N h st a 1. W 0) M N " co 1.4 03 CO h N M M N O ID O In O CO M M CO U) At N I•• U) CO O U) CO N CD CO in ID N O at U) M CO 0) O ID ID N N CO at M U) ID N 10 ID O O N WI In h h At O) ID N r CO N N 0) CO At O O h O N N O a O N CO In U) N O 0) M At O N O) M 01 10 10 O 01 CO N CO M In CD N CO (1) r O 7 N U) N CO in 03 a M co 10 U) 0) I- O m O W M U) O d M M O In 0) h U h O O at M 0) CO h N At U) u) At N h ID N M h .•• O W d ID M h a M a a " ID co O O CO M O h • i 1 D E w U) M O O O ?� w Z O O O co O " h U) M 1. N l4 o' N 0 0 " r 0 0 ID Co N O (r) ^ h N M N 0 N 10 U) a a 0 O) in N O ID a r 0 10 O .- 10 CO Parcel 242304.9057 M M 0 ) 0 0 0 0 00 0 6 0 co co I D U) 11) U) O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1242304-9034 252304 -9006 N 0 °° °o m co U) O 0 0 01 O c o In O 0 0 352304.9105 352304 -0120 '352304 -0120 352304 -9094 352304 -9095 1362304-9087 352304.9101 [ 362304 -9074 1362304-0079 352304 -9017 CO 10 ° w a O M N tD M 1362304-9009 362304-9059 352304 -9031 252304 -9063 I 06Z0-OZLSLL O 0 ID U) O O 0 [262304-9023 O In d CO o ° m d m N 0 CO M N N M U) U) N 262304 -9086 D a o 6 0 h 0) to M 1359700-0245 0 O h 0) U) M 1537920-0330 [ 115720.0292 [262304-9021 537920 -0290 [ 537920 -0290 262304 -9127 N CO 0 0 N a) h M in [262304-0137 1537920-0300 1262304-9128 1537920 -0315 1537920-0310 262304 -9129 1262304 -9068 262304.9011 1262304.9077 1 sII123f+ a '■ 112301 M M N 1. 4/1 cn • I N I- O N N • 1D m" 0 N N CO N N M a a 0) N M 0) CO N 0) N M 0) N N CD N O O N to M CO a a O m At O O At M N 1n N O) N In CO a N N CO O a M O N a U) O O a In O a N N " N N " N a a "" d a O a O d .- a 1. d" a 1. to 10 CD M Cl N N" N N a In in N N d M N U) N N U) N N N M d N N a N N Street S 156 St S 158 St S 158 St S158St t0 co U) N N Co U) 0 D. M to U) S163St S 180 St S 180 St N O co N S180St N 0 CO 0 I0 co 0 0 co Co 0 0 N m 0 0 co co C0 co co 0 co N I0 0 co N N N 0 0 CO co N N S180St Saxon Dr jl Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky 'Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky ,Southcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky [Southcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky iSouthcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky I 1Southcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky Southcenter Pky 1Southcenter Pky 0I co N O) U) 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N O m O to N 0) to Number 7200 7351 7351 7400 7400 J 0 O At h 0 1n CO N 7300 O N 0 C0 .- In ID 1A 0 CO ID 0 U) h tD O In N ID 0 0 co co ID t0 O N a Co Co t0 t0 ;6847 O 0 h [7210 7220 O tO .- ~— 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 1400 15700 16400 116415 l 116425 1 16500 I 16501 1 O in O O O O O 10 ID h h ID ID tD ID r O M O ID CO ID ID " r M 00 CD r — Building Hampton Inn Hotel Emhneeo Y Suites parking Embassey Suites parking Expo Center parking Expo Center building Expo Center wetland Expo Centeroarkina c ,� .0 - (1 ` IL 1 o. D &H Distributing Co., etc. Emerald Bettina .m.. m Y O > a 0 U H m E O O > C (( C •V 6 E C c 1st Interstate Operations Center Seafirst Operations - VACANT Home Depot, Depot Diner [1st Interstate Consumer Bnkg Ctr VACANT Parkina for American Hardware [Crystal Springs 1Parking for 7220 Pavillion Mall parking 'Costco. etc 10 0) C C Y x?" N a.2 O E w O) > N C m c O N d Z a a .0 l0 c O m Bon Marche Parkina CA C '? N 0 1�`a m M Southcenter Theater Southcenter Place Southcenter Flower Market See's Candies Double Tree Plaza McDonald's (Magnolia Hi F Sizzler Toys'R'Us 'Puna Power Sub Station O N d S O •+ ) m x E .� O CO 2 J .0 >' m N Bon Marche Warehouse -7 ..l • M.. ...w • Development Hampton Inn Hotel Embassey Surtes pal kmg Embassey Suites parking McLeod Expo Center McLeod Expo Center McLeod Expo Center \Irl nnA Gvnn ronlor ror� JUL.lauuis 0 &l-t Distributing Co Cnnaln 9imnfraef 'O U C > % 0 ; m ° f P3 U) c Seafirst Operations - VACANT Home-Depot 'Riverbend Ind /Office Center a:..n.1.nnA tnAlnffirn ranter L h > C -I C - i N 0 p C y mo 0 n — Z' Z' S u U d m U N N II co d r N m C C C C O m m m U O > 0O >O O Cn N co n M 10 > In - a w C m 0> cn Y m `y N N N E 0 a. 11O > j y 33 s 7 1. C>. >. U 0 % m t b 0 m 3 0 o oU Y '.(, O m O z W N m N N c) a w a O _ m f0 m 7 - _ .Om d C u N a IL 4 Cr 0 > a 0 a 3 rn Y o Y 0 O a N a co - . D4 a C i : 0 C U Bon Marche Warehouse eDJd >> 7 7 D 7 j D 7 7 D 7 D j 7 j>> m n 7> 7 7= 7 7> M>> j> >u7 7>> 7>>> 7>>> j 7 z W `� C U 00 W H CO IL WO u Q V! J W z� F— O z -- • Q. O• N O I. W W WZ F- - 0 z CITY OF- TUKWILA --, Departmen. Jf Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: rf Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application O Design Review Application (12 copies) in Design Review Fee ($900) • SEPA Environmental Checklist (12 copies) • SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) N/A ❑ Shoreline Permit Application & Fee (if within Shoreline Overlay District) PLANS [Twelve (12) copies of the following]: CI Vicinity map showing location of the site. (otJ A-1) Ca Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's property lines. (orl A- I Tr Site plan at 1". 30' or 1 20', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the architect. The following information must be contained on the plan (details may be included on additional drawing sheets): GY Property lines and dimensions, lot size(s), and names of adjacent roads Cr Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with setbacks Cr Location of driveways, parking, loading, and outdoor service areas, with parking calculations and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening 4' Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas Or Location and type of site fumiture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art NIA 0 Location of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications (if any) N(A 0 Location and classification of any watercourses or wetlands, and 200' limit of Shoreline Overlay District a Existing and proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5 feet beyond the site's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% ExYfirlei PAI6MEtzT a.1 , RECEIVED MAR 14 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DESREV.DOC 7/3/96 c ' Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of utilities or strec. 'riewalk easements or dedications Or Description of water and sewer availability from provider of utility (note which utility district or at er Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences. ra Landscape/planting plan at the same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be contained on the plan: 4r Property lines and names of adjacent roads = F ef' Location of the following: proposed structure(s), vehicle and pedestrian circulation w re 2 areas, dumpster /recycling area, site fumiture, any proposed public outdoor art 4r Existing trees over 4" in diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved _1 o Or Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing. t co W ✓ . Building elevations of all building facades at a scale of 1/8" = 1' or 1/4" = 1', with graphic scale N and date. Each sheet shall have the license stamp of the architect. Include on the elevations: ui o a. Dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements, with notations of 2 materials to be used <. Or Location and type of exterior building lighting N a Or Location of mechanical units and proposed screening where necessary. 1 Z 1- Q Signage per Sign Code. o z t- O One (1) "PMT" (photomaterial transfer, or photostat) each of above plans, reduced to 8.5 x 11 2 �. inches. U 0. N O Colors and materials sample board showing colors and materials to be used on all building 0 -` exteriors. w APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA: ~o'. Written response to the Zoning Code Design Review Guidelines and Comprehensive Plan Design w z Review Policies (see attached Design Review Application). U o I3 OTHER MATERIALS: OVOANU. -' ar 511S PLPmS -?-t "0 iC LoPPI folos 0 2, Loa: t-) z Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate, such as color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to be considered, twelve (12) copies of each must be submitted (except models). Copies of full size color drawings or photos may be submitted as 8.5 x 11 -inch color photocopies. PUBLIC NOTICE: • King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mr Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks- -must be included.) See Attachment A. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B. DESREV.DOC 7/8/96 +•r Wegg 1 D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval), will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at 11, k �, % (city), SAS G, it I lctre._1, ,1997. Soca i �ce���r Kin ^�7o—r lofe. •Osc+ /y rtr (state), on (Signature) sci (Print name) Ala RECEIVED MAR 1 4 1997 COMMUNITY Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signOatures. L ' ';Ti ',,?mo.4;vr .}'.d'o;: :.:W'aW4,iidr,,t, ??:il i lu'(.`'RA. i:It t'. z F z` QQ 2 •J U' oo u) rnw • w 2. F-; LL, w 0. g� a a l-i z z� w D. • U� O co 0 1— •111.1 W, o. wz •z. CITY OF TUKWILA -- Department c:, Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 DESIGN REVIEW (P -DR) APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Planner:.:: File Number: Receipt Number:: Project File #: 94, oVg ❑. Application Complete`' (Date: SEPA File #: oo • ❑ Application Incomplete (Date: Shoreline File #: 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: OUT6 kCQ. STt=A .NOOSE' STAU T B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection; if proposal applies to several properties, list the streets bounding the area.) �� I►�1 Rot (TO 'We T o n t7OU8c `T> (/UeST Sci1TES ) I (PSOO 5,00- rI- \GEr.i e OL E VP -tQ Quarter: Ntrf Section: 'Uo Township: 23 Range: 04- (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: RIGS LE"NTZ ac M ILK LEN•TZ_ n- 11 -166-r ADDRESS: 1 600 136.1.1-1 4LPr -E NE SUITE 10o i LLEVoe: WA .13005' PHONE: - l 1 �4 ?I. Ad" - '74 AMY SIGNATURE: /I / , , DATE: Mkgai 3) /117 ///.! P/L!!IiIJ_!40>��_ Ir SOO r . Yoh w(- w h-c^ a✓ CA. a t(- L..2.(. C -t.a. . (7-1- pe,44 tn . t- C wit-) D 14Y.i.e. (1 --Sv1 RECEIVED MAR 14 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Christopher Brown Cb Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Fax 772 -4321 Traffic Impact Analvsis for the Outback Steakhouse in Tukwila, Washington April 24, 1997 Traffic Engineers CAS Transportation Planners i ~ Z,. JU;. .0 O Ito Di cow; w =; J I w 0: J• :N W I— O Zt U 0 Nc: i t] I.. Vs u_ L11 Z OH. z , ECEIVED MAY 0 5 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT F r da 'w:�r�`>, ,r..c Jk:. r aVWc1r. �a' a r Od ai7LL :Faiijs:�k^aFr. <.Gtsn "u�tr }m ruil:•�'i t«rS: i:4 i Y• °�'w+fi. �:d FS�r• .. t. vui,., r":t;.. . iim. �e,. s:, y�>:" L; ri•; d3o,• siLrt. it ?....��_r,5uw:e.�; °'cr,+j,;:1 ii \i v ... ... . Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS z 'a .- z:: Introduction 1 u Purpose 1 Existing Road Network 4' . Existing Traffic 4 ' w =; Population and Traffic Growth 4 cu_; Trip Generation 5 w o Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 5. 2 Adjacent Land Uses 9 Q Levels of Service Description 9 D; - Level of Service Analysis 11 C7 _ w:. Discussion - Mitigating Measures 11 z _, Conclusions 12 a_ . F- O! Z F-: w w; • gyp;. :0 ,-. :al ', ..T. Fr: V O Z+. . . -wD. U.= Z1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1, Vicinity Map 2 Figure 2, Site Plan 3 Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project 7 Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 8 Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes With Project 10 LIST OF TABLES Table I, Trip Generation 5 Table II, Level of Service Criteria 9 Table III, Results of Level of Service Analysis 11 tNi ±i:1i�.;,•;x'„S :;xzrf'k°i2i.4i;�t'�riiNi+ Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Introduction The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a "High- quality, sit down" restaurant and will be located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 500 feet south of Strander Boulevard in front of the Double Tree Suites hotel. It will have seating for 238 patrons and its hours of operation will be limited to the evenings only. Since such a facility may increase vehicular traffic demands and potentially affect operations of adjacent roads during the p.m. peak hour, it is appropriate to review current and future traffic operations, identify potential impacts, and identify any appropriate mitigation measures. The location of the Outback Steakhouse relative its surroundings is shown in Figure 1, Vicinity Map on the following page. Purpose The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to: o describe the road system serving the proposed development and assemble a database of current traffic operations; o identify an horizon year by which the proposed Outback Steakhouse development could be constructed and generating traffic; o develop an appropriate population growth rate for the surrounding area and estimate traffic volumes that might reasonably exist in the horizon year; o determine the trip generation rates or the amount of traffic likely to be produced by the development; o identify the primary directions of travel within the subject area and, based on this, assign site generated traffic to the surrounding road network; o compare current traffic operations with what is expected to exist in the future both with and without the proposed development; o identify any roadway capacity or other deficiencies that given construction of the proposed development would necessitate subsequent modification or improvement; o identify roadway improvements currently planned in the vicinity of the project; o determine appropriate mitigation measures to safely accommodate additional site generated traffic and compute fair share mitigation costs. 1 . Air dkG4 '7GSia'atizioliib.5`ei 3 4aiStlS:itti Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Painier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 N < a- 6 S 15TH1 ST 74:j ST aIN- fH ' 4400 = 1-- ST I 1 I ..; 1. I T S 157110 PI 1.. an •YLf a a S 153RD CH FQ+1 .Si ST h y N RESTYIEJ = c a PARK S1 162 g S 163RatPL —f'" - 3 $ = �< ST `vfil I164TH ST cgr S( TUKWILA YpNS� i cDN CRYSTAL SPRINGS PARKr�OP SOUTHCENTER .? --•; � \159TH � ', = 1615T \ S NDQ ST ST PKWY EVANS BLACK_ 1 . BAKE R BL ft) E g u dram( ST 168TH STRANDER --5-166 TIT ST/ ST 1 ST 1 1 5100 • 2ND S V' 172ND PL 5TH 7TH ST 4300 178TH ST 5 179TH _IAOTH 5T 181sT 5T. Figure 1, Vicinity Map .. , :i ,' ... ':: CS C +..`ti �'�1�c"`,ar•.- •:it'2'k: I,`���SF.X' rJ ^: VA4i�"04i.3.444A; i,' • PAVILION MALL TH% 5600 S 180TH rs ono m' fIJ Z Pn,... NN/5T(NSIN (hell r rraa 181ST ST Christopher Brown «' Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ititt r 5x ;lG °?fly G'-"" iti 2itkl i ti !ar' . "it(f4 PAISIra 3 n55.iY' AzA,,t: i iv.t:3 1. p iz.1.L '.r�i •64: i":4 4� kidluii rY �a1t4�i4r"i "�. Christopher Brown Co' Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. quite A-201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 sJ Existing Road Network The road system serving the proposed Outback Steakhouse primarily includes Southcenter Parkway, Strander Boulevard, Klickitat Drive, and the freeway ramps. Other roads that may carry some site generated traffic include Minkler Boulevard and South 180th Street. Key elements of the roadway network are described as follows: o Southcenter Parkway is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane and numerous curb -cuts along its length. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at South 180th Street, the 17500 block, the 16700 block, Minkler Boulevard, Strander Boulevard, and at the I -5 on and off ramps. o Strander Boulevard is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane along most of its length. Left-turn channelization exists at intersections and major access drives. Traffic signals and protected left-turn channelization exist at the East Valley Highway (SR -181), Andover Park East, Andover Park West, the south access drive to South Center Mall, and Southcenter Parkway. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph, is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. o Minkler Boulevard is•a lightly traveled two -lane collector with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It is illuminated, with curbs and gutters, and sidewalks in places. posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at Southcenter Parkway, Andover Park West, and Andover Park East. Existing Traffic Current turning movement data for this study was obtained in April of 1997 in clear, dry weather conditions. No adverse weather or other conditions existed that might skew the data. These data are shown in both the level of service computations included in the appendix to this report as well as Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes on page 6. Population and Traffic Growth Historic traffic volume data was analyzed to identify an historic growth rate in vehicular travel demand. Once determined, this rate was extrapolated to a future horizon year and uniformly applied to existing traffic volumes to estimate expected future volumes. In this study, the horizon year was taken to be the year 2001 since the Outback Steakhouse can reasonably be expected to be constructed, occupied, and generating tragic by this time. Historic traffic volume data made available by Tukwila Department of Public Works staff has been collected and compiled from 12 "control count" stations located throughout the City of Tukwila. Between 1986 and 1996 the annual rate of growth in traffic volumes was 1.5 percent. Taken from the present to the year 2001 this amounts to a compounded overall growth rate of 6.2 percent. 4 Christopher Brown C4 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 z �Z. :cc 6 DE 00 ID =. J H .w 0;. gQ = d. z z� z i— La UL ;O N w w` H U. u' O' tli Z. (& z Year 2001 traffic volumes, shown in Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project, were estimated by applying the growth rate to those volumes shown in Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes. Trip Generation The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a quality restaurant with a turnover rate likely to exceed at least one hour or longer. It will operate only between the hours 4:00 p.m. and midnight. The 5th edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual refers to this kind of facility as a Quality Restaurant and has published trip generation data under land use code (LUC) 831. The trip generation characteristics for the proposed development are given below. Table i, Trip Generation Time Period Traffic Volumes A. W.D.T. 610 A.M. Inbound N/A A.M. Outbound N/A Noon Inbound N/A Noon Outbound N/A P.M. Inbound 34 vehicles per hour P.M. Outbound 14 vehicles per hour Note that land use code 831 contains no data on morning or noon -time trip generation. Morning and noon -time trip generation estimates are therefore not included. Their impacts are insignificant and have no effect on subsequent level of service analyses. Trio Distribution and Traffic Assignment Given the generally north -south orientation of traffic in the area near the proposed development, the trip distribution is based on the north -south distribution of traffic at the most proximate major intersection, Southcenter Parkway and Strander Boulevard. Site generated traffic was assigned to the surrounding road network using the analogy method. That is, the assignment was based on current turning movement counts at intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips will likely pass. A description of the analogy method is given on pages 54 and 55 of the 1TE publication Transportation and Land Development, by Vergil Stover and Frank Koepke. The trip distribution and traffic assignment for the Outback Steakhouse is shown on pages 8 of this report. 5 Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ..�..., .- 1�"k•- d1';: +M + +xr�t "' � � . tA-'' %r'vvt�?s'UP"tT'ile - avt3te�.,` �ai at' 3tE1;' xhiiSC�it' �. 6. 5T6�fi '�?1:�SstiJrduiV:iRN.�'a�i u:rtx+wlekn5om!' k: 4t`. ufet;.tkT!Nlpivr A?tlN1:!!1t$,�fr uebT''�: �: tt: �i' tc^ ifisywHfSoiSYtt�P4X�ifai;W.�' 'i4'S"'..t}Y„��:' th�1d5gYe XOIekitot ®rlvs 205 0 Off Romp, Moll Entrance) Strondor D3ou0ovord �AlnOcl�r D3ougovord South Moth Str ••t Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes IN1 NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ,n sri,ra its r ctf;t..' t t rrnie av�ctaxYsa ;t'ib:ew,::xatir.?ti���;ir; e;.sii�'rvssywso�n -r z D 0. :U N0. J F; . W O a` • 1W' H-O Z U 0 `ice H !W Zi Z • 167 95 —■ 5-1 55 258 r- N (.4 J( OCllckitatt Drive 0 N t. v 285- - 431- 11 Ga N 218 a. 0 Southcontor Parkw ®y Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes 0 -3 Off Ramp, Moll Entrance Strmnd•r Boulevard (� g T--581 t x-296 r w N Minkler Boulevard South 1190th Street 'ithout Project U NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown i Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ..,.,..Y.3i _,,,.,,,, �'u:.,. iii:,: ��'.? rY...:..,.. o�La^. eii�f ..rc4'iv;iL'+'..:Yt�"r':7">,: "'icit;'t9t,.•zrep s,e.':3.$7'rx,:'al:% OCIlekltot ®riv 5 —141 u, 1 1 • L. • a. • c • u Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Si }rt. 0 —:5 Off Romp, Moll Entrance -r4 Strond.r 03ouI•eord L L 2 MInkl.r 03oulovard South 9ooth Str••t Inc Assignment U V NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown e Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ,:;,.r,r.tt L+ Yes: ?.2'f iii Sri` ::t 1c�11`1.i.�i�£'i�iSEc:i si'.{ «>2i ?it:itrCw"L+"4 it1%S 'rd :.7Sti � "ri'f. +•'C;4. " :X%�1 x iii.F�n id ; "t:.o. :4 : a..3,,i541.Ux:3: ioreS'fi,s::Yt'- '!.f�.+tr. izz. IX 2 Ui UO. .U) W ;' • • W =,. CO LL: u. V f._ W: _; oi W W'. • :2 a ` 0 H� W Wt. • 1-7 U o Z iii 0- ,0~ z.., Adjacent Land Uses Apart from the Double Tree Suites hotel, land uses in the immediate vicinity of the Outback Steakhouse are primarily retail. There are also a variety of restaurants, a professional office building, gas station, a major distribution center, and a city park to the east. The proposed Outback Steakhouse is will not introduce any new divergent land uses or land use conflicts. z It is a compatible land use. Q w' Levels of Service Description uQl> J U. Level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. Level of service ranges from N o. LOS "A" to LOS "F." LOS "A" reflects ideal driving conditions where one can select N speed and change lanes at will and expect delays of less than 5 seconds. LOS "F" I': represents severely constrained operations characterized by excessive delays. Level of N : service as a function of delay is shown in Table II. w 0 O g Table I1, Level of Service Criteria sets forth the standards by which levels of service are w a.. determined. This, along with a detailed discussion on how levels of service are computed is a contained in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 published by the X w Transportation Research Board. Z I— O Z H Table I1, Level of Service Criteria n; U O co — 0 I- w w: I- LI 0: O ~: Z Signalized Levels of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A B >5.0 and 5_15.0 C >15.0 and 525.0 D >25.0 and 5_40.0 E >40.0 and 5_60.0 F >60.0 Unsignalized Level of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 5_5.0 B >5.0 and _510.0 C >10.0 and 5_20.0 D >20.0 and 5_30.0 E . >30.0 and 5_45.0 F >45.0 There are several PC based software packages available to compute levels of service. Two programs, the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and Signal -94, were used in this report. They were developed by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida and Strong Concepts, respectively and are used under license to Christopher Brown & Associates. Outputs from these software packages are included in the appendix of this report. In order to determining the level of service of signalized intersections, one must first have signal timing and phasing information. Signal -94 however, contains a routine by which optimum signal timing and phasing information is computed. Since optimal settings may 9 Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 'CtF'.tA112, r.:41r» ..t`:rS,Y;;s',h.±�Y r "a'�s,,� _e .firkF,+'1"iAr4iFS.2G31rieW t:('J+:A4M+SZ'8m .22.'.4: XIIckftot Drive / 218 r .t a. 265 A 436 y� d 5 le I .•.. • u f. 0 to 0 -5 Off Romp, Mall Entrance Strend•r Boulevard MInkl•r Boulevard South 1 80th Street Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes 'ilk Project 10 "3 Iry NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 • .. .. not be in effect in actual practice, there may be some difference between actual and computed settings. Such difference however, are typically minor. This notwithstanding, the same signal phasing and timing settings are used in all three of the "Current," "Future Without Project," and "Future With Project" scenarios and thus provide a common basis for comparison. Level of Service Analysis � Z; Neither the background growth expected in the vicinity of the proposed Outback Ilk c4 2 Steakhouse nor the development itself are expected to have any significant impact on the 6 v adjacent road network through the year 2001. The results of this level of service analysis v p are tabulated below. ; co o CO W w I. Since the Outback Steakhouse will operate during evening hours exclusively, only the p.m. J F- peak hour is included in this analysis. Also, only those intersections through which 10 or p more site generated trips would pass are included. 2 Table 11i, Results of Level of Service Analysis = =U' I-w Signalized Intersections Current 1997 Year 2001 Year 2001 z i=.. on Southcenter Parkway Conditions w/o Project w/ Project z O. LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay tu u @ Minkler Boulevard B 8 B 8 B 8 v o @ Strander Boulevard B 9 B 9 B 9 '0 �,. @ Klickitat Drive C 20 D 26 D 27 1_` w w. @ I -5 Off Ramp at Mall Entrance B 8 B 8 Not Impacted �?' u. 0 Note that only the intersection at Klickitat Drive will experience a reduction in level of iii Z` service due to the addition of background growth traffic. However, this reduction is due ow only to a modest increase in delay of six seconds per vehicle and, of some importance, the 0 1- LOS "D" is still acceptable. Z In summary, there will be no adverse traffic flow consequences associated with the full implementation of the Outback Steakhouse development. Increases in traffic will be minimal and the road system as it currently exists is well able to handle the minor, additional traffic. Discussion - Mitigating Measures With the addition of site generated traffic and with no changes in geometry or traffic controls, adequate levels of service and safe traffic operations will continue beyond the year 2001 at all impacted intersections. No need exists to change current roadway geometry or traffic controls. At the project site access to Southcenter Parkway, good levels of service and excellent entering sight distances exist suggesting that no remedial measures are necessary through I1 Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 the year 2001. As currently proposed and with future forecast traffic conditions and roadway geometry, the access will operate very well. It may be discerned that the reason there will be no traffic impacts is that the peak hour of the site does not coincide with that of the arterial and freeway systems. These tend to be in the 3:15 to 4:15 interval essentially before the opening time of the restaurant. Indeed, for this reason no reduction in traffic for "pass -by" trips has been used, rather all site traffic is considered to be associated with "primary" or destination trips. Conclusions The following conclusions may be drawn. 1. The project will generate some 610 vehicular trips per day with 48 of these in the evening peak hour. 2. The inclusion of this project with background traffic growth does not appear to alter the levels of service on the arterial system in the noon and evening peak hours. On the strength of the trip generation data of this study and the assumed distribution based on the'analogy meihocl, the project adds little traffic to the key intersections in the area. 4. None of the intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips pass will experience any deterioration in level of service due to the addition of site generated 'traffic. Adequate levels of service are forecast to the horizon year of 2001. 5. Given continued adequate operations at all impacted intersections, no mitigation measures are needed. 6. The existing roadway and associated traffic signal systems are entirely adequate for accommodating site related traffic with no modification or revision being required. \17. The reason the project produces =negligible traffic impacts: is due to its. peak _.erg demand arriving:much later .. than the peak: hour: of the street system which tends to be in the 3 15 to 4: 15 interval. `: Essentially, the operation of this restaurant is not`. coincident: with the peak` operation of the street system and ,tlierefore, there is adequate" reserve capacity .• 12 Chri8topher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201. Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 .. z f� W D U; 0 0; w O; U) W W= J �., w0 2 -a = W' = z� �o zI- W W: U 0' O N; 0I- w w 0 w z'. 0_ O F- z Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila, Washington Appendix Capacity and Level of Service Computations along Southcenter Parkway Minkler Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions 1 Future 2001 Conditions without Project 6 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 11 Strander Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions 16 Future 2001 Conditions without Project 20 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 24 @ Klickitat Drive Current 1997 Conditions 28 Future 2001 Conditions without Project 32 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 36 @ I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance Current 1997 Conditions 40 Future2001 Conditions:without Project 45 @ Site Access/On Site Queuing:.:. 50 '�:1:�' 'i1�. a .a �C!i+.; ."�!,.•1. k a �. 1� �' {.7 ^L *` } t.�.:.+.i� -n3 � li.`�S�e'rLi'.r'�ii;.,�� � .....'.2],�x',fn }c x�% �+�A'irF: "�9's�i :rak+l.Lv`�.;•.k`,�`:kiy,h, ci;i�� +7..ivM,a:.lti:7 ?:'lR4 . 1�„ ..r!�7}*.:�L`riler +.. ti'y'i.,r • •_•t;. W, JO Oo 11E. •.W =s wo a, • = o `-.W zp ! .r-- o; • •Z 17; • W UJ 0 �'1,• • ;w W� • O1 • .7 =1. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 0 .0 0 / 0 12.0 1 -- 36 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 615 24.0 2 48 12.0 1 0 .0 0 648 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:29:35 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \ 90 .0 0 /\ 0 12.0 1 / 55 .0 0 North / 18 .0 0 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** /\ North v + + ++ v G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.20 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 01 '-�''� .� # z _ �. w 00. co. O CO J I.-; N U; w° co D v. w Z�: F- 0' Z 0 I-; w W H - LL. p. .. z' 0 W: 0 z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0.'.90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 615 .66 932 TH 932 2 1.05 979 .00 .00 N -LT 48 .50 96 LT 96 1 1.00 96 1.00 .00 E -RT 90 .70 129 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 214 1 1.00 214 .40 .60 E -LT 55 .65 85 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 18 .64 28 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 648 .66 982 TH +RT 1010 2 1.05 1060 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 36 .64 56 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 0 .90 0 TH+RT 56 1 1.00 56 .00 1.00 W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:29:35 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap. Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow - -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N -. LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .819 .890 1.00 1357 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 WAzjil#t rr�zv# ,W;alatwWO:^ W5.14W0§.' rW47l r' s :�ieiitgric r: t4y5jte<'.�+geaV. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT 04/24/97 09:29:36 W -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1.0000 1 .0000 85.0000 . 3972 . 0000 56.0000 3.0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv.. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 1 .4167 .9333 1.0000 2.4435 . 7187 .3032 14.4367 . 8400 . 3972 . 0000 1.0000 1.3720 .0000 . 1655 .8899 . 8899 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph N- TH 979 3725 .263 .619 2305 .425 N- LT Pri. 96 1770 .054 .142 251 .382 E- LT +TH +RT 214 1357 .158 .281 382 .560 S- TH +RT 1060 3710 .286 .427 1584 .669 * * W- TH +RT 56 1425 .039 .281 401 .140 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Sum(v /s) = Xc = .498 .585 z rz W � 00 0 wi. J 1- N w, w O. =w 1- w, z o; uj gyp; O N. H w O ..z w 0 f..' Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions 04/24/97 09:29:36 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service" Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- sec /v vph - sec /v sec /v - sec /v - N- TH .425 .619 4.5 .85 2305 16 .08 3.9 A N- LT .382 .142 17.8 .85 251 16 .49 15.6 C+ > 4.9 A E- LT +TH +RT .560 .281 14.0 .85 382 16 1.41 13.3 B > 13.3 B S- TH +RT .669 .427 10.5 .85 1584 16 .78 9.7 B+ > 9.7 B+ W- TH +RT .140 .281 12.3 .85 401 16 .01 10.4 B > 10.4 B Cycle= 60" Int Total .536 > 7.9 B+ �'i vic U O J w w 0! w¢: =a xw Z „z Z w. moo,. �U0g.14 .I w' c 111 Z'. O z • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** North v + + ++ v G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% 04/24/97 09:29:37 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS. Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del :min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft N Approach RT TH LT E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 28 8 0 62 14 0 2305 251 129 0 85 29 1031 0 56 0 0 2405 0/0 12/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 6 0 0 28 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 382 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4923 A C+ .00 .43 .38 .0 6.4 25.7 0 26 10 0 127 22 B B+ B B+ .00 .56 .00 .00 .67 .00 .00 .14 .00 .54 .0 22.1 .0 .0 15.0 .0 .0 16.8 .0 12.6 0 20 0 0 66 0 0 4 0 126 0 46 0 0 213 0 0 10 0 418 0 12 3 0 157 69 0 5 0 130 0 0 20 0 0 256 0 0 1 0 41 0 0 34 0 256 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1075 214 1060 Int W Approach Total 56 2405 A .42 8.1 36 149 B .56 22.1 20 46 B+ .67 15.0 66 213 B B+ .14 .54 16.8 12.6 4 126 10 418 15 157 5 130 20 256 1 34 41 256 Z _ H. � .„,1111, QQ2U , J U 0; N 0; N LL; W 0: LL Q H W' Z� •Z F- •U u) 1- w tar - Z, = O I--. z • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 / 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 38 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 653 24.0 2 51 12.0 1 \ .0 0 688 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:26:51 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES \ 96 .0 0 / 0 12.0 1 / 58 .0 0 North / 19 .0 0 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2. -0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 1 Phase 1 ( Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 * * / ** / \ North v + + ++ v Phase 5 1 Phase 6 G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.20 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% G /C= .000 G /C= 000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ��j,(� ^.__t:il:n__ �.���L`i• "'..u�:_i^ . �' fb ;.:.�:'�.•:N�fs::i�':"r'.C�'M: �hs."�'jf3" .. 06 z Z • • mow: 2. D 00 u)w I: N U w g u.< ia. _. Z p; z° gyp. O to ;0 W LLJ' uF-.~ O. O ~� 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 653 .66 989 TH 989 2 1.05 1038 .00 .00 N -LT 51 .50 102 LT 102 1 1.00 102 1.00 .00 E -RT 96 .70 137 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 226 1 1.00 226 .39 .61 E -LT 58 .65 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 19 .64 30 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 688 .66 1042 TH +RT 1072 2 1.05 1126 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 38 .64 59 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 59 1 1.00 59 .00 1.00 W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:26:52 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .818 .885 1.00 1349 S- TH +RT' 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 07 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT 04/24/97 09:26:52 W -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1.0000 1 .0000 89.0000 .3938 .0000 59.0000 3.0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane .Group .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 1.4833 .9833 1.0000 2.2751 .7187 .4372 14.6050 .8381 .3938 .0000 1.0000 1 .3893 .0000 .1651 .8850 .8850 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vphg -- vph N- TH 1038 3725 .279 .619 2305 .450 N- LT Pri. 102 1770 .058 .142 • 251 .406 E- LT +TH +RT 226 1349 .168 .281 379 .596 S- TH +RT 1126 3710 .304 .427 1584 .711 W- TH +RT 59 1425 .041 .281 401 .147 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Sum(v /s) = .529 Xc = .622 06 rx'! tc+? HVr.. s?S!t^ a. �v^ t;.: rtiJH.: v$ ::iii;+wi4:+i�:�i!tvtz'ta'.�+ 4�. 13.` i; i; YJ, iaJ` };uitil, °R,;w; ^`. ".`,`51.'a, iQti'.'!'1'£G45i ai?;.<'Nvr�5i ''e...`�.,,.,� ter. te' T1 ^M4. =.1-. • • w. U0 V) 111 • J w; wO D. w. 1- o Z I-< 0 0. C3ff,. 1 U': 1- -. - O; ui Z. O ~, Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap cr h Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 04/24/97 09:26:52 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - N- N- TH .450 LT .406 . 619 4.6 .85 . 142 17.8 .85 E- LT +TH +RT .596 . 281 14.1 .85 TH +RT .711 . 427 10.7 .85 W- TH +RT .147 .281 12.3 .85 Cycle= 60" Int Total .569 2305 16 .10 4.0 A 251 16 .61 15.8 C+ > 5.1 B+ 379 16 1.85 13.9 B > 13.9 B 1584 16 1.06 10.2 B > 10.2 B 401 16 .01 10.5 B > 10.5 B > 8.2 B+ 09 4M«i E+ Malcai '�'1FJ.�i- i�l%kd�.tilMw%�: zt J 0 U0 !. N �` w = CO ILI w 0 i. •; CO zd:. I— w; Far— E-0 z W w U i0 NE. w w` U + tllZ; z ' Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on'Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 1 * * / ** / North Phase 1 + *> v Phase 2 Phase 3 v + + ++ v G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% 04/24/97 09:26:53 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph. Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft N Approach RT TH LT E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 1038 102 137 0 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 0 29 9 0 21 0 62 14 0 28 0 2305 251 0 379 89 32 1094 0 59 0 0 2551 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 0 32 0 0 7 0 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4920 A C+ .00 .45 .41 .0 6.6 26.0 0 28 11 0 137 23 B .00 .60 .0 22.9 0 22 0 49 B .00 .00 .71 .0 .0 15.6 0 0 73 0 0 232 0 13 3 0 167 74 0 5 0 137 B .00 .00 .15 .0 .0 16.9 0 0 4 0 0 11 B+ .00 .57 .0 13.0 0 138 0 452 0 0 22 0 0 272 0 0 1 0 44 0 0 36 0 272 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1140 226 1126 Int W Approach Total 59 2551 B+ .45 8.3 39 160 B .60 22.9 22 49 B .71 15.6 73 232 B B+ .15 .57 16.9 13.0 4 138 11 452 16 167 5 22 137 272 1 44 36 272 10 ;`t :. .. r�r ,:t_...�..!h�i..•;'3:hJis,'�:i: �'.'.i::}:L�:(n ;�.LuvN.w.a <� i'�: °.Y3: Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 38 .0 0 \ LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 657 24.0 2 52 12.0 1 .0 0 705 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:23:15 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES \ 98 .0 0 /\ 0 12.0 1 / 58 .0 0 North 19 .0 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 * * / ** North Phase 2 Phase 3 + v + + ++ v Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 11 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions 04/24/97 09:23:15 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet ZQ Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of . i Z: - Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT - - vph vph vph - -- vph o. N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 cn o : N -TH 657 .66 995 TH 995 2 1.05 1045 .00 .00 w w w =; N -LT 52 .50 104 LT 104 1 1.00 104 1.00 .00 .-11-: N w; E -RT. 98 .70 140 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W O: ZE E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 229 1 1.00 229 .39 .61 E -LT 58 .65 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 1 a' S -RT 19 .64 30 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 = v. S -TH 705 .66 1068 TH +RT 1098 2 1.05 1153 .00 .03 1'_. S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Z~ Z F-. W -RT 38 .64 59 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w w: W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 59 1 1.00 59 .00 1.00 • m W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 c) u` CI 1-- w W;'. • V SIGNAL9 4 /TEAPAC [ V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet H: - 0 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj uiN' pr. Group Ideal of Sat- c) ch Mvmts. Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow 0 - I- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg z N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .817 .886 1.00 1350 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 N.lics.t�L:.itatlS•.. : ?is' �`.a:: Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT 04/24/97 09:23:16 W -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1.0000 1.0000 89.0000 . 3886 . 0000 59.0000 3.0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm.- LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 1 .4833 .9833 1.0000 2.2751 . 7187 . 4372 14.6050 . 8381 .3886 . 0000 1.0000 1.3893 . 0000 . 1645 .8863 . 8863 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 • .0000 .0000 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.41 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph N- TH 1045 3725 .280 .619 2305 .453 N- LT Pri. 104 1770 .059 .142 251 .414 E- LT +TH +RT 229 1350 .170 .281 380 .603 S- TH +RT 1153 3710 .311 .427 1584 .728 W- TH +RT 59 1425 .041 .281 401 .147 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Sum(v /s) = .539 Xc = .634 13 z z re 2LU U O; C1) 0. cnw J= H L. w O' J co3 1-11 = z 1-0 z Lu n 0 I-, W W H V' u. ~O .z OH z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPACCV1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 04/24/97 09:23:16 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - N- N- TH .453 LT .414 E- LT +TH +RT .603 S- TH +RT .728 W- TH +RT .147 Cycle= 60" Int Total .580 . 619 4.6 .85 2305 16 .10 4.0 A . 142 17.8 .85 251 16 .66 15.8 C+ > 5.1 B+ . 281 14.2 .85 380 16 1.93 14.0 B > 14.0 B . 427 10.9 .85 1584 16 1.21 10.4 B > 10.4 B . 281 12.3 .85 401 16 .01 10.5 B > 10.5 B > 8.4 B+ 14 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 * * / ** / North Phase 1 + *> v Phase 2 Phase 3 v + + ++ v G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% 04/24/97 09:23:16 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg.Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft N Approach E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT S Approach RT TH LT W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 1045 10 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 30 9 0 62 14 0 2305 251 140 0 0/0 12/1 0 21 0 28 0 380 89 32 1121 0/0 0/0 24/2 0 0 32 0 0 43 0 0 1 584 0/0 0 0 0 59 0 0/0 12/1 0 7 0 28 0 401 0 0/0 2590 0 0 0 4921 A C+ .00 .45 .41 .0 6.6 26.1 0 29 11 0 138 24 B .00 .60 .0 23.0 0 22 0 50 B .00 .00 .73 .0 .0 15.9 0 0 76 0 0 240 B .00 .00 .15 .0 .0 16.9 0 0 4 0 0 11 B+ .00 .58 .0 13.2 0 142 0 463 0 13 3 0 168 75 0 5 0 0 22 0 139 0 0 279 0 0 0 0 1 0 44 36 0 279 N Approach E Approach S Approach Int W Approach Total 1149 229 1153 59 2590 B+ .45 8.4 40 162 B .60 23.0 22 50 B .73 15.9 76 240 B .15 16.9 4 11 B+ .58 13.2 142 463 16 168 5 139 22 279 1 44 36 279 15 z • w 00. CO p: W = u.! IA 0. u. <C. • p. = 5 Ci H- _. Z �.. E- 0: Z F- ,D • O f. p H- P. w W. .z: U 017 Z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 665 24.0 2 385 24.0 2 0 .0 841 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:45:05 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES 547 12.0 1 /.\ 0 .0 0 279 24.0 2 North 294 12.0 1 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 * * / ** / North + + + + * * ** + +> v v Phase 6 G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% is ;Slici:'.',ii,c; 16 :, w • V O` i CO 0: 'CO w, • w H, CO LL! w 0, .2 w; z Z O; • . .D �. N; • 'w W 1--U; .11-- O; z' U • O ~. z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph vph - -- vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 665 .88. 756 TH 756 2 1.05 794 .00 .00 N -LT 385 .93 414 LT 414 2 1.03 426 1.00 .00 E -RT 547 .89 615 RT 615 1 1.00 615 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 279 .77 362 LT 362 2 1.03 373 1.00 .00 S -RT 294 .88 334 RT 334 1 1.00 334 .00 1.00 S -TH 841 .88 956 TH 956 2 1.05 1004 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:45:06 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1r( Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap. Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S- RT S- TH 794 3725 .213 Pri. 426 3539 .120 . 673 2508 .317 . 251 888 .480 615 1583 .388 Pri. 373 3539 .105 . 528 836 .736 . 227 803 .465 * 334 1583 .211 1004 3725 .269 . 649 1028 .325 . 372 1387 .724 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Sum(v /s) = .658 Xc = .731 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF -- sec /v 04/24/97 09:45:06 Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS vph - sec /v sec /v - sec /v - N- TH N- LT . 317 .67.3 3.1 .85 . 480 .251 14.5 .85 E- RT E- LT . 736 .528 8.3 .85 . 465 .227 15.2 .85 S- RT S- TH . 325 .649 3.6 .85 . 724 .372 12.3 .85 Cycle= 60" Int Total .541 2508 16 .03 2.7 A 888 16 .33 12.7 B > 6.2 B+ 836 16 2.38 9.4 B+ 803 16 .32 13.3 B > 10.9 B 1028 16 .07 3.1 A 1387 16 1.33 11.8 B > 9.6 B+ > 8.8 B+ r: " "s. Tun= r_3::' iii :"ri:;ti:.�.:,�.a,:a::�iuu'+.. ,e.....,r:k.r. hi:'r•1..;�i.uu:�iJW' �:uiic�'i7uitike'�• ;t:� • mow. 00 NW • w =,. w 0, g w d =w z1... 1- O: z UJ D • CX ' 0 1- ,w W; • U • O; Iii z U N: z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** North v v * * * +> + G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 04/24/97 09:45:07 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del :s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft N Approach E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 794 426 615 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 23 14 42 0 67 25 53 0 2508 888 836 0 373 334 1004 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0 13 25 29 0 23 65 37 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 3546 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7450 A B B+ .00 .32 .48 .74 .0 4.4 20.0 14.9 0 15 36 38 0 82 91 119 B A B .00 .47 .32 .72 .0 20.9 5.5 17.9 0 33 8 75 0 81 37 216 B+ .00 .00 .00 .00 .54 .0 .0 .0 .0 13.7 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 626 0 9 11 10 0 109 135 245 0 10 4 21 0 122 99 266 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 266 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1220 988 1338 Int W Approach Total 0 3546 B+ .37 9.8 51 173 B .63 17.2 71 200 B+ .62 14.8 83 253 B+ .00 .54 .0 13.7 0 205 0 626 20 135 20 245 25 266 0 65 0 266 z re W .J0: 00: (00: U) W W =; J CO IL; uJ O • J u. a; (D Z Z • Z 0. ILI • 0 I- W la LL z` _i O ~t z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 -- o .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 706 24.0 2 409 24.0 2 .0 0 893 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:41:58 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES 581 12.0 1 /•\ 0 .0 0 296 24.0 2 North 312 12.0 1 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 * * / ** North Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 j Phase 5 Phase 6 + + + + * * ** + +> v v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 20 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow -Mvt Vol PHF Rate vph -- vph Lane Group Group Flow -- vph No.of Lane Lanes Util Adj Prop.of Flow LT RT vph N -RT 0 .90 0 N -TH 706 .88 802 TH N -LT 409 .93 440 LT 0 802 440 0 2 2 1.00 1 .05 1 .03 0 .00 .00 842 .00 .00 453 1.00 .00 E -RT 581 .89 E -TH 0 .90 E -LT 296 .77 653 0 384 RT LT 653 0 384 1 1.00 0 1.00 2 1.03 653 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 396 1.00 .00 S -RT 312 .88 355 RT S -TH 893 .88 1015 TH S -LT 0 .90 0 N 355 1015 0 1 2 0 1 .00 1 .05 1 .00 355 .00 1.00 1066 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap pr . ch Lane No Adjustment Factors Group Ideal of Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn 04/24/97 09:41:59 Left Adj Turn Fact Adj Sat - flow vphg .TH 1900 2 1.000 N- LT 1900 2 1.000.. .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT E LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S- RT S- TH 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 Z .J UO: CO LW wI • LL! W O} J . IL < t O: • w z �. I- o .ZI f.:1 • U 10 ‘Zil • w` • -O • Z: 0 -- •0 • z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S- RT S- TH 842 3725 .226 Pri. 453 3539 .128 . 673 2508 .336 .251 888 .510 653 1 583 .412 Pri. 396 3539 .112 . 528 836 .781 . 227 803 .493 355 1583 .224 1066 3725 .286 . 649 1028 .345 . 372 1387 .769 * Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Sum(v /s) = .699 Xc = .776 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF -- sec /v -- Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - sec /v sec /v - sec /v - 04/24/97 09:41:59 Incr Lane Lan Delay Group Grp Appr Appr d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS N- TH N- LT . 336 .673 3.1 .85 . 510 .251 14.7 .85 2508 16 888 16 . 03 2.7 A .42 12.9 B > 6.3 B+ 10.7 B 13.4 B > 11.7 B . 08 3.2 A 1.88 12.6 B > 10.2 B E- RT E- LT . 781 .528 8.6 .85 . 493 .227 15.3 .85 836 16 3.36 803 16 .40 .S- RT S- TH .345 .649 3.6 .85 .769 .372 12.6 .85 1028 16 1 387 16 Cycle= 60" Int Total .574 > 9.3 B+ Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 * * / ** / North v v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% C= 60 MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% •N Approach RT TH LT E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 04/24/97 09:42:00 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 842 453 653 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 24 15 44 0 67 25 53 0 2508 888 836 0 396 0/0 24/2 0 13 0 23 0 803 355 1066 12/1 24/2 26 30 65 37 1028 1387 0/0 0 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/0 3765 0 0 0 7450 A B B .00 .34 .51 .78 .0 4.5 20.3 16.5 0 16 38 45 0 89 97 131 B A B .00 .49 .34 .77 .0 21.2 5.6 18.8 0 35 8 83 0 86 40 234 B+ .00 .00 .00 .00 .57 .0 .0 .0 .0 14.4 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 677 0 9 11 10 0 116 143 260 0 10 4 22 0 0 129 105 282 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 282 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1295 1049 1 421 Int W Approach Total 0 3765 B+ .40 10.0 54 186 B .67 18.3 80 217 B .66 15.5 91 274 B+ .00 .57 .0 14.4 0 225 0 677 20 20 26 0 66 143 260 282 0 282 23 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 717 24.0 2 409 24.0 2 \ 0 .0 0 900 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:40:08 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \ 581 12.0 1 0 .0 0 / 300 24.0 2 314 12.0 1 /\ North Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 * * / ** / \ North Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 + -I- 4. + * * ** + +> v v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1 % G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 24 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 717 .88 815 TH 815 2 1.05 856 .00 .00 N -LT 409 .93 440 LT 440 2 1.03 453 1.00 .00 E -RT 581 .89 653 RT 653 1 1.00 653 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 300 .77 390 LT 390 2 1.03 402 1.00 .00 S -RT 314 .88 357 RT 357 1 1.00 357 .00 1.00 S -TH 900 .88 1023 TH 1023 2 1.05 1074 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:40:09 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950'1.00 3539 S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 z H± • r4 w JV: U O rnw. WO ga' J < N d _; 1-o z (9 ow :W W'. tL 0 .. U N' z 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c Crit Lane Grp N- N- TH 856 LT Pri. 453 3725 .230 .673 2508 .341 3539 .128 .251 888 .510 E- RT 653 LT Pri. 402 1583 .412 .528 836 .781 3539 .114 .227 803 .501 S- RT 357 1583 .225 .649 1028 .347 S- TH 1074 3725 .288 .372 1387 .774 * Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c L1.4] - HCM Sum(v /s) = .701 Xc = .779 Level -of- Service Worksheet Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 04/24/97 09:40:09 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - N- TH .341 N- LT .510 . 673 3.2 .85 . 251 14.7 .85 2508 16 .03 2.7 888 16 .42 12.9 E- RT .781 E- LT .501 . 528 8.6 .85 . 227 15.4 .85 836 16 3.36 10.7 803 16 .43 13.5 S- RT .347 S- TH .774 . 649 3.6 .85 . 372 12.6 .85 1028 16 .09 3.2 1387 16 1.97 12.7 Cycle=' 60" Int Total .577 A B > 6.2 B+ B B > 11.8 B A B > 10.3 B > 9.3 B+ W' J U; U 0: N0 to W . W = :CO LL'. W 0'. 2 z H =1. Z 1-1 F- 0 • :W W. •O N • 0 W • H _! ~ 0 '• • Z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 ' Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** / North + " + * * ** + > v v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% C= 60 MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% N Approach E Approach RT TH LT • RT TH LT S Approach RT TH LT 04/24/97 09:40 :10 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 856 453 653 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 25 15 44 0 67 25 53 0 2508 888 836 0 402 357 1074 0/024/2 12/1 24/2 0 14 26 30 0 23 65 37 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 3795 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7450 A B B .00 .34 .51 .78 .0 4.5 20.3 16.5 0 16 38 45 0 91 97 131 B A B . 00 .50 .35 .77 .00 .0 21.2 5.7 18.9 .0 0 36 8 85 0 0 88 40 237 0 B+ .00 .00 .00 .58 .0 .0 .0 14.4 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 684 0 9 11 10 0 118 143 260 0 10 4 22 0 0 131 106 284 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 284 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1309 1055 1 431 Int W Approach Total 0 3795 B+ .40 10.0 54 188 B . 67 18.3 81 219 B .67 15.6 93 277 B+ .00 .58 .0 14.4 0 228 0 684 20 20 26 0 66 143 260 284 0 284 27 :rt. ;�}�F:<i': L3:rf:1'%i:.3.�a�i.)X .,-::yr ^..4�:s.:.. t \�v}�i'A`v: "' - ''l5`l�i !:Y.:. - •'..+Y.` wt. _.. .... ..... .. _ ... ''•i' 6 r..,sy;i..y �kY; �: i; 1: �: idrk��t��. aa. J': ��avax- <.c:..,���.��;i�'.�i�^�..�a�+� z 1-Z OO CI)o W= CD LL W O' g5 J LL ¢• 3 1- W _. z 1-. 1- O' z ui U O SAS O Hi .w • w; 1- V( .z' Uu H I? Z . , Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 725 12.0 1 268 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 406 12.0 1 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 434 24.0 2 .0 0 1066 24.0 2 322 24.0 2 0 .0 04/24/97 09:56:21 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES 0 0 .0, 0 0 .0 0 .0 0 North Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT E. W . 0 2.0 2:0 2.0 NO .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0 0 .77 .90 .92 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Sq 31 * * / ** /.\ North Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * <* <* + + + ++ * + v * + v G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= �..u.� -•. F'1'i �.. J.: {`v, i��j:�p:l ^y.MS; 4 ^lip?A37.tPF,xcli4 tip'- �r %ifi�t•T.'a`ii:�kl1KCCu�i'3YiAi f•A'�iNN4" .SsiKlTa4T'.1Bi �S'�Yi '*V�.Rfrls� -` `igaiiog .0 sec = .0% �S' ` �C CSscY« kw:# ctY? •f`zn?�iy'`G�%ae^�zS�+f`.!ti z 1=- Z .u6n: • 0O' .(/) CO La. W • Jam;. W O' LL ¢: tea. • H. _. • Z�' F- 0 W W:. 10 2 W. . F" 0 w Z coi .0 - OH z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph 04/24/97 09:56:21 Z 11-: mow: 2 u D N -RT 725 .86 843 RT 843 1 1.00 843 .00 1.00 •0 0O, N -TH 434 .90 482 TH 482 2 1.05 506 .00 .00 ; (0 0 N -LT. 0 .93 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w z; JF-. 0LL. • wO 2 W -RT 406 .77 527 RT 527 1 1.00 527 .00 1.00 co: •W -TH 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -LT 268 .92 291 LT 291 1 1.00 291 1.00 .00 :Z m;. . 1-0 . Z F-'. • 10 N' .wa • 1 V -- lL H. O N- RT 1900 1• 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 w N; N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 0 l''. S • •• TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 322 .92 350 TH 350 2 1.05 367 .00 .00 S -LT 1066 .88 1211 LT 1211 2 1.03 1247 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 25 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c Crit Lane Grp N- RT• N- TH 843 1583 .532 506 3725 .136 . 559 886 .951 . 234 873 .580 * S- TH S- LT 367 3725 .099 Pri. 1247 3539 .352 . 641 2390 .154 . 374 1323 .943 W- RT W- LT 527. 1583 .333 Pri. 291 1770 .164 . 699 1107 .476 . 292 516 .564 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Sum(v /s) = .885 Xc = .948 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap cr h Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Green Ratio g/C Unif Delay d1 sec /v Delay Fact DF Lane Group Capac vph Cal Term m Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 04/24/97 09:56:22 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - N- RT N- TH S- TH S- LT. W- RT W- LT .951 .559 14.2 .85 . 580 .234 23.2 .85 886 16 14.29 873 16 .72 . 154 .641 4.9 .85 .943 .374 20.7 .85 2390 16 1323 16 . 476 .699 4.6 .85 . 564 .292 20.5 .85 1107 16 516 16 Cycle= 90" Int Total .725 26.4 D+ 20.4 C > 24.1 C . 00 4.1 A 9.80 27.4 D+ > 22.1 C . 26 4.2 A 1.08 18.5 C+ > 9.3 B+ > 20.1 C 30 •Z Z Z JU: .0 O: � tnWs • w= NAL w o: u- < • = o: H =. Z 1• O. •Z • ,0 H: uf Z, N, Z R Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 I Phase 1 * * / ** / \ North <* + + + ++ * + v * + Phase 2 Phase 3 + + v G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.50 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% MVMT TOTALS N Approach Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln :ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV. @E: vph Svc • Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que :veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh 1 Max Que: ft 04/24/97 09:56:22 Ped= .0 sec = .0% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 843 506 12/1 24/2 56 19 56 23 886 873 0 0 0 0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 367 1247 527 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 15 38 39 0 64 37 70 0 2390 1323 1107 0 291 3781 0/0 12/1 0 23 0 29 0 516 7095 D+ C .95 .58 31.0 31.5 109 66 199 112 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A D+ .00 .15 .94 .0 6.6 44.9 0 10 233 0 36 301 A .48 7.4 16 59 C+ .00 .56 .0 29.4 0 36 0 62 C .73 29.9 470 769 19 19 470 245 0 0 0 0 0 7 39 8 0 0 0 0 0 83 494 201 0 10 102 0 261 494 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1349 0 1614 Int W Approach Total 818 3781 C .81 31 .2 175 311 .00 .0 0 0 C .76 36.2 243 337 B+ .51 15.2 52 121 C .73 29.9 470 769 38 470 0 0 46 494 18 261 102 494 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 770 12.0 1 / 285 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 431 12.0 1 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 461 24.0 2 .0 0 \ 1132 24.0 2 342 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:54:27 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES \ o .0 0 / 0 .0 0 / 0 .0 0 North 0 .0 0 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .77 .90 .92 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 31 * * / ** / \. North Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= 25.3" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= 4.0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF =67.5% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% . .. .. ti y'..r :.f.\r Lc�t •t _ - '.'.Ixi�iti:h�u�letL'lf,V.L'U "1�5::�s!: At.t 4 {4:1;..'Vl e{ini1i,tfa`fS Rl i+i4rA"r, iC'%. .:y11L i.{�I�O.ti l3Tba- �'�i�f s� :S:ri f�iJf..'��•9iK�iti N1Kwi3. z • � U O' co D: cnw W I, I; N IL, W O: : • U. *It • 5d Hw z1- 1-0; Z a CV 10 Nt 0 .. Z. O ~. { Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Vol vph Flow PHF Rate -- vph Lane Group Group Flow -- vph No.of Lane Lanes Util Adj Prop.of Flow LT RT vph N -RT 770 .86 N -TH 461 .90 N -LT 0 .93 895 RT 895 512 TH 512 0 0 1 2 0 1.00 1.05 1.00 895 .00 1.00 538 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 0 .90 0 S -TH 342 .92 372 TH S -LT. 1132 .88 1286 LT 0 372 1 286 0 2 2 1.00 1.05 1 .03 0 .00 .00 391 .00 .00 1325 1.00 .00 W -RT 431 .77 W -TH 0 .90 W -LT 285 .92 560 0 310 RT LT 560 0 310 1 1 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 560 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 310 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap pr • ch Lane No Adjustment Factors Group Ideal of Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn 04/24/97 09:54:28 Left Adj Turn Fact Adj Sat - flow vphg N- N- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1 TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1 .000 1.00 1583 .000 1.00 3725 S- S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 W - RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 rna�zYarHai.�.y.,.; ;+�'.•�J:�'�r,� 'i:�J�ifi� i;:��amr Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph v/c Ratio v/c Crit Lane Grp N- RT N- TH 895 1583 .565 .559 886 1.010 538 3725 .144 .234 873 .616 S- TH S- LT 391 3725 .105 .641 2390 .164 Pri. 1325 3539 .374 .374 1323 1.002 * W- RT W- LT 560 1583 .354 .699 1107 .506 Pri. 310 1770 .175 .292 516 .601 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v /s) = .940 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Xc = 1.007 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Green Ratio g/C Unif Delay Delay Fact d1 DF sec /v Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Lan Grp LOS 04/24/97 09 :54 :28 Appr Delay sec /v Appr LOS N- RT N -. TH 1.010 .559 15.1 .85 . 616 .234 23.4 .85 S- TH .164 .641 4.9 .85 S- LT 1.002 .374 21.4 .85 W- RT W- LT . 506 .699 4.8 .85 . 601 .292 20.8 .85 Cycle= 90" Int Total .770 886 16 25.70 38.5 D 873 16 .95 20.9 C > 31.9 D+ 2390 16 .00 4.2 A 1323 16 19.36 37.6 D > 30.0 D+ 1107 16 .33 4.4 A 516 16 1.42 19.1 C+ > 9.6 B+ ..1;.'� .. .:, Gl iius`•• t::%.). isi?: ;:.4tN >.u„r':�r:.,...::.+;i±;.: v�.: acv. ..r.;,� 4it.i n.. ai�x::ISa���Y:4i.'.r; > 26.2 D+ 34 z ice cc 6 U O; i Co U' U) W.; W =. 2 r. J N = d. z I-O OiZ 1-: :0 I- 'wuj O', U N. • off 4 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project • SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * * / ** • C* + + + ++ * + v * + * * <* G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% 04/24/97 09:54:29 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max .Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS i Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v t Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 895 538 12/1 24/2 59 19 56 23 886 873 0 0 0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 391 0/0 24/2 0 16 0 64 0 2390 1325 560 24/2 12/1 40 40 37 70 1323 1107 0 310 4019 0/0 12/1 0 24 0 29 0 516 7095 D C 1.01 .62 42.3.31..9 158 72 223 120 A D A .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .16 1.00 .51 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.6 45.3 7.7 0 0 0 0 0 11 250 18 0 0 0 0 0 39 331 65 C+ .00 .60 .0 30.1 0 39 0 67 D+ .77 32.7 548 845 22 21 551 261 0 0 0 0 0 7 42 8 0 0 0 0 0 89 530 213 0 11 111 0 278 551 N Approach E Approach S Approach Int W Approach Total 1433 0 1716 870 4019 D+ .86 38.4 230 343 .00 .0 0 D+ .81 36.5 261 370 B+ .54 15.7 57 132 D+ .77 32.7 548 845 43 551 0 0 49 530 19 278 111 551 g U0: to W' • W= W g Q; 'co D =a z •Z 0` >• •D p' • W W'. LL. F: -O ILI co: 0 z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila ! Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 770 12.0 1 467 24.0 2 .0 0 285 12.0 1 / + 0 .0 0 -- 436 12.0 1 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. \ 1137 24.0 2 344 24.0 2 04/24/97 09:52 :55 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \ 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 / / 0 .0 0 North 0 .0 0 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .77 .90 .92 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 31 Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** North <* + + + ++ * + v * + * * <* G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" ,Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 30 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project 04/24/97 09:52:55 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Vol PHF vph -- Flow Rate vph Lane Group Group Flow -- vph No.of Lane Lanes Util Adj Prop.of Flow LT RT vph N -RT .770 .86 N -TH 467 .90 N -LT 0 .93 895 RT 519 TH 0 895 519 0 1 1.00 2 1.05 0 1.00 895 .00 1.00 545 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 0 .90 0 S -TH 344 .92 374 TH S -LT 1137 .88 1292 LT 0 374 1292 0 1.00 2 1.05 2 1.03 0 .00 .00 393 .00 .00 1331 1.00 .00 W -RT 436 .77 W -TH 0 .90 W -LT 285 .92 566 RT 0 310 LT 566 1 0 0 310 1 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 566 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 310 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane No Group Ideal of Mvmts Satfl Lns -- pcphg - Adjustment Factors Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact Adj Sat - flow vphg N- RT N- TH S- TH S- LT W- RT W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1900 2 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 zQ • mow: V O' ca.: • cow; . w = I--; W O: • 2 • to O: iv. 1- O. ZH-� Wwi . :2 O: ID O O N' • ,W F=- V u'O Z' • ;0 N Off''. Z 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s -- vph vphg Analysis Worksheet Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c Crit Lane Grp N- RT 895 1583 .565 N- TH 545 3725 .146 . 559 886 1.010 . 234 873 .624 S- TH 393 3725 .105 S- LT Pri. 1331 3539 .376 . 641 2390 .164 . 374 1323 1.006 * W- RT W- LT 566 1583 .357 Pri. 310 1770 .175 . 699 1107 .511 .292 516 .601 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap Lane pr Group ch Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Sum(v /s) = .941 Xc = 1.009 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Green Ratio g/C Unif Delay Delay Fact d1 DF sec /v Lane Group Capac vph Cal Term m Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Lan Grp LOS 04/24/97 09:52:56 Appr Delay sec /v Appr LOS N- RT N- TH 1 .010 .624 . 559 15.1 .85 . 234 23.5 .85 886 16 25.70 873 16 1.01 S TH .164 S- LT 1.006 . 641 4.9 .85 . 374 21.4 .85 2390 1323 16 .00 16 20.40 W- RT .511 W- LT .601 .699 4.8 .85 . 292 20.8 .85 1107 16 516 16 Cycle= 90" Int Total .773 38.5 D 21.0 C > 31.9 D+ 4.2 A 38.6 D > 30.8 .34 4.4 A 1.42 19.1 C+ > 9.6 B+ > 26.6 D+ 33 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** / North <* + + + ++ * + v * + * * <* G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% 04/24/97 09:52 :56 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 895 545 0 0 0 0 0 393 1331 566 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 59 20 0 0 0 0 0 16 40 41 56 23 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 886 873 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 0 310 4040 0/0 12/1 0 24 0 29 0 516 7095 D C 1.01 .62 42.3 32.0 158 73 223 122 A D A .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .16 1.01 .51 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.6 46.2 7.8 0 0 0 0 0 11 256 18 0 0 0 0 0 39 332 66 C+ . 00 .60 .0 30.1 0 39 0 67 D+ .77 33.0 555 849 22 21 551 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 43 9 0 89 549 215 0 11 113 0 278 551 N Approach E Approach S Approach 1440 0 1724. Int W Approach Total 876 4040 D+ .86 38.4 231 345 .00 .0 0 0 D+ .81 37.2 267 371 B+ D+ . 54 .77 15.7 33.0 57 555 133 849 43 551 0 0 50 549 20 113 278 551 y;�v'li tx`%:`• ' ?ti'r:�::isu.! :' ' ? );I i?rttir: !,:i. h`.40,46,? 33 .ftwarmnorrer,-* M53pX�?r'AWiS z HZ. UO co W = J W LL W0 ga d, �w z F-0. z U co W w! W O uiz O ▪ 1- z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 / 911 24.0 2 45 12.0 1 157 12.0 1 / + 89 12.0 1 -- 5 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. \ 0 .0 0 776 24.0 2 04/24/97 10:16:06 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES \ 52 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 243 12.0 1 71 .0 0 / North Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 I Sq 11 * * / ** / \ North Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.60 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 40 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions 04/24/97 10:16:07 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of 11-'; I- -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT w CC vph -- vph -- vph - vph D`. u �` JU N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0O N -TH 911 .88 1035 TH 1035 2 1.05 1087 .00 .00 co o: N -LT 45 .93 48 LT 48 1 1.00 48 1.00 .00 '. .W = •J I-. CO IL; E -RT 52 .81 64 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 41'0; E -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 64 1 1.00 64 .00 1.00 1 E -LT 243 .84 289 LT 289 1 1.00 289 1.00 ..00 J' LL Q! S -RT 71 .80 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 m. S -TH 776 .95 817 TH +RT .906 2 1.05 951 .00 .10 1- _ S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 ZI-;. 1-0. W -RT 5 .50 10 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 'ZE W -TH 89 .66 135 TH +RT 145 1 1.00 145 .00 .07 Wilt D. W -LT 157 .58 271 LT 271 1 1.00 271 1.00 .00 D CI U N. 'O ,O SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet I=,. ▪ U; Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj Z; pr Group Ideal of Sat- '...C.' (1) , ,ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow H =: -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg 0 - N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000'1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 E- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .657 1.00 1224 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1843 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Input /Calculation 04/24/97 10:16:07 Approach N -LT E -LT S -LT W -LT ccaa J V 0 0:.. • No Ww WI :. w o'. a. =• a • w,. Z �. 0. Z ui 10 F-` w w• O; Z,: Z C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of. Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time 60.0000 60.0000 .0000 .0000 26.9690 25.0310 .0000 .0000 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 2.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 48.0000 289.0000 .0000 .0000 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 951.0000 145.0000 .0000 .0000 3.0000 3.0000 .0000 .0000 LTC - Left Turns per Cycle .8000 4.8167 .0000 .0000 Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 7.9250 2.4167 .0000 .0000 Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 qro - Opposing Queue Ratio .5339 .5661 .0000 .0000 gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 8.4992 .0000 .0000 .0000 gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 19.4697 26.0310 .0000 .0000 fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) .2806 .7844 .0000 .0000 PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) 4.2496 .0000 .0000 .0000 PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT 5.6855 1.5213 .0000 .0000 EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 fmin - Minimum Value.for fLT .1430 .1537 .0000 .0000 .fm.-.LT Factor for LT (9-17) .1430 .6574 .0000 .0000 fL - LT Factor for •Lane Group .1430 .6574 .0000 .0000 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila 1-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp P vphg vph TH 1087 3725 .292 .466 1737 .626 * N- LT Pri. 48 266 .180 .466 124 .387 04/24/97 10:16:08 1)-:• 1-w. J U: U O; CO w : J fir' N LL E- TH +RT 64 1583 .040 .434 687 .093 W O` E- LT Pri. 289 1224 .236 .434 531 .544 * ni S- TH +RT 951 3671 .259 .466 1711 .556 u_ P d. W- TH +RT 145 1843 .079 .434 800 .181 z LI W- LT Pri. 271 1770 .153 .434 768 .353 Z1- 1- O . Z I-, O N! SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet o H;. Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Sum(v /s) = .528 Xc = .586 WuJ: Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan =. --?! pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr u-0 ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- sec /v -- vph - sec /v sec /v - sec /v - o - w N- TH .626 .466 9.2 .85 1737 16 .52 8.3 B+ Z N- LT .387 .466 7.9 .85 124 16 1.02 7.8 B+ > 8.3 B+ E TH +RT .093 .434 7.6 .85 687 16 .00 6.5 B+ E- LT .544 .434 9.6 .85 531 16 .90 9.0 B+ > 8.6 B+ S- TH +RT .556 .466 8.8 .85 1711 16 .31 7.8 B+ > 7.8 B+ W- TH +RT .181 .434 7.9 .85 800 16 .01 6.8 B+ W- LT .353 .434 8.6 .85 768 16 .12 7.5 B+ > 7.2 B+ Cycle= 60" Int Total .530 > 8.0 B+ 43 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila 1 -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance ' Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 * * / ** North G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 04/24/97 10:16:08 C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph f Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft E Approach RT TH LT S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 1087 0/0 24/2 12/18 0 31 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 64 0 28 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 7 28 0 43 43 0 687 531 93 858 0 10 135 271 2855 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 28 0 0 11 19 0 47 0 0 43 43 0 1711 0 0 800 768 6353 B+ B+ .00 .63 .39 .0 13.1 18.9 0 59 4 0 205 8 B+ B+ .00 .09 .54 .0 10.3 15.6 0 3 19 0 9 54 B+ B+ B+ B+ .00 .56 .00 .00 .18 .35 .53 .0 12.4 .0 .0 10.9 12.4 13.0 0 49 0 0 7 14 155 0 171 0 0 22 45 514 0 19 0 245 1 0 1 5 25 0 31 138 0 17 0 214 0 0 3 5 51 0 0 69 129 245 APPR TOTALS Param:Units N Approach AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft E Approach S Approach 1135 353 951 Int W Approach Total 416 2855 B+ .62 13.3 63 21' 3 B+ .46 14.6 22 63 B+ .56 12.4 49 171 B+ B+ .29 .53 11.9 13.0 21 155 67 514 20 6 17 8 51 245 138 214 129 245 le 4 4 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 967 24.0 2 48 12.0 1 \ 167 12.0 1 / + 95 12.0 1 -- 5 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Appr Grade \ 0 .0 0 824 24.0 2 04/24/97 10:11:51 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES \ 55 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 258 12.0 1 75 .0 0 /• \ North Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 11 **/** / \ North Phase 1 Phase 2 + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .417 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= 25.0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= 4.0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF =51.6% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ...... ,. "''ii.'i;u 3'S'r.� y'c:'• %�'`a: c`'r�. l.�klvs� 45 mrINWWIIMPWRIORWMWM z C4 w: QQ 2; J U' U O: co o'. w= w O` z d: I.w. z� 1- O Z H. O N 'w W. .1-- I V! u. z: Uu O Z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet 04/24/97 10:11:51 Z Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of i z -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT w vph -- vph -- vph - vph V 72; u . J V' N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 • o O' N -TH 967 .88 1099 TH 1099 2 1.05 1154 .00 .00 ; co . N -LT 48 .93 52 LT 52 1 1.00 52 1.00 .00 W w E -RT 55 .81 68 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w O E -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 68 1 1.00 68 .00 1.00 258 .84 307 LT 307 1 1.00 307 1.00 .00 a uE-LT Q S -RT 75 .80 94 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 d. S -TH 824 .95 867 TH +RT 961 2 1.05 1009 .00 .10 w S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Z i W -RT 5 .50 10 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 z Oi-. W -TH 95 .66 144 TH +RT 154 1 1.00 154 .00 .06 UJ j W -LT 167 .58 288 LT 288 1 1.00 288 1.00 .00 D C 13 ml! .0 F-; w w. SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC.[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet ��?; u. H, Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj z. pr Group Ideal of Sat- vco ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow H z -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg z ~ N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1'.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 E- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .641 1.00 1193 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1845 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 4u Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila 1-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet 04/24/97 10:11 :52 z Approach 11=' Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT W -LT 1- w. C - Cycle Length 60.0000 60.0000 .0000 .0000 6D. . G - Actual Green Time 26.9690 25.0310 .0000 .0000 00 g - Effective Green. Time 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 �' go - Opp. Effective Green Time 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 ' w i` N - Number of Lanes 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 ' J ~ No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) 2.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 co O vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 52.0000 307.0000 .0000 .0000 2? PLT - Proportion of LT 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 g5 PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 a. vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 1009.0000 154.0000 .0000 .0000 (I) i3 tL - Lost Time 3.0000 3.0000 .0000 .0000 II! LTC - Left Turns per Cycle .8667 5.1167 .0000 .0000 ? ~' t-O Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 8.4083 2.5667 .0000 .0000 zt Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 W W' gf - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 D p gro Opposing Queue Ratio .5339 .5661 .0000 ;O .0000 vtn° gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 9.4737 .1781 .0000 .0000 Of- gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green 18.4953 25.8529 .0000 .0000 w W,. fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) .2444 .7788 .0000 .0000 �t�`: PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 u.� n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) 4.7368 .0891 .0000 .0000 z: PTHo - .Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 v EL1. - TH Equivalent for LT 6.3890 1.5505 .0000 .0000 H Z EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000. .0000 ZF- fmin - Minimum Value for fLT .1430 .1537 .0000 .0000 fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) .1430 .6405 .0000 .0000 fLT - LT Factor-for Lane Group .1430 .6405 .0000 .0000 4i Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap cr h Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Adj Flow Flow Satfl Ratio Rate Rate v/s vph vphg -- Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph v/c Ratio v/c Crit Lane Grp N- TH N- LT Pri. 52 1154 3725 .310 . 466 1737 .664 266 .195 .466 124 .419 E- TH +RT E- LT Pri. 68 1583 .043 .434 687 .099 307 1193 .257 . 434 518 .593 s- TH +RT 1009 3671 .275 .466 1711 .590 W- TH +RT 154 W- LT Pri. 288 1845 .083 .434 800 .192 1770 .163 .434 768 .375 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Sum(v /s) = .567 Xc = .630 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Green Unif Ratio Delay g/C d1 -- sec /v Delay Fact DF Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 04/24/97 10:11:52 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - N- N- TH .664 LT .419 . 466 9.4 .85 . 466 8.1 .85 1 737 16 .69 8.7 124 16 1.36 8.2 E- TH +RT .099 E- LT .593 . 434,. 7.6 .85 . 434 9.8 .85 687 16. .00 6.5 518 16 1.33 9.7 S- TH +RT .590 . 466 9.0 .85 1711 16 .40 8.0 W- TH +RT .192 W- LT .375 . 434 8.0 .85 . 434 8.7 .85 800 16 .02 6.8 768 16 .15 7.6 Cycle= 60" Int Total .564 B+ B+ > 8.7 B+ B+ > 9.1 B+ B+ > 8.0 B+ B+ B+ > 7.3 B+ > 8.3 B+ 'iilN' 1aisz.F2;•.le�:vtu`i: .. ;,;na�tr •, =,�S,v. .. , z i LIJ U O Mow W2. J w }• O' � Q -d z 1_; Z 0' 2 D 0: ;O N'. :W W; H V O Z'. UN: Z ; Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila 1-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter i Future 2001 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Sq 11 * * / ** North Parkway Evaluation of Intersection Performance Phase 1 Phase 2 + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% C= 60 sec MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 N Approach E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 04/24/97 10:11:53 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 1154 52 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 32 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 68 0 307 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 7 30 0 43 43 0 687 518 99 910 0 10 144 288 3032 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 29 0 0 11 20 0 47 0 0 43 43 0 1711 0 0 800 768 6340 B+ B+ .00 .66 .42 .0 13.5 20.1 0 65 4 0 223 9 B+ B+ .00 .10 .59 .0 10.3 16.5 0 3 21 0 10 59 B+ .00 .59 .0 12.7 0 53 0 186 B+ B+ .00 .00 .19 .38 .0 .0 11.0 12.7 0 0 7 15 0 0 24 49 B+ .56 13.4 168 560 0 21 0 260 1 0 1 6 25 0 32 147 0 18 0 227 0 0 3 5 55 0 0 74 138 260 APPR TOTALS Param:Units N Approach AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops :veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft E Approach 1206 375 Int S Approach W Approach Total 1009 442 3032 B+ .65 13.8 69 232 B+ .50 15.4 24 69 B+ .59 12.7 53 186 B+ .31 12.1 22 73 B+ .56 13.4 168 560 22 260 7 147 18 227 8 138 55 260 � w U O U 0. cow ` w =' J • LL. w 0.. LL. Q Cy; I- la Z �. I- 0 Z 2D U 0; ;0 co 0E- :w W` • V 0: Z UN �? O.; z HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK- P5.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 Streets: (N -S) Southcenter Pkwy (E -W) Site Access Major Street DirectionNS Length of Time Analyzed15 (min) Analyst Date of Analysis 4/25/97 Other Information Future 2001 Conditions Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( %) SU /RV's ( %) CV's ( %) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 2 < 0 N 1205 19 .95 .95 0 Southbound L -- -T -- -R 1 2 0 15 .95 1.10 501 .95 0 N Eastbound L -- -T -- -R 0 0 0 Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road. Queuing Comments 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 Z 11 Z mow. 6n .J 0 00'• Westbound J co 0 > 1 < 0 wO 5 0 9 .95 .950 .95 = d• w Z 3: E--0 1 .10 1 .10 1 .10 L J_`; p O� 0 I— W W u--- Follow -up — Z` Time (tf) W N` 2.10 0 2.60 z 3.30 3.40 The level of service analysis indicates that some queuing will take place. On site it will amount to not more than a single vehicle since the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.2 vehicles which can be rounded up to one (1). In the southbound 2 -way, left turn lane the LOS is at 'C' and the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.0 vehicles which, for a worst case, can be also rounded up to one (1) although for the majority of the time there will be no vehicles waiting. .. • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK- P5.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 644 653 653 0.98 Step 2:. LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1 288 349 349 0.95 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1821 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 89 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1 821 73 0.95 0.95 0.95 69 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) (veh) (sec /veh) WB L 6 69 > WB T 0 89 > 156 25.7 0.2 D 25.7 WB R 10 653 > SB L 18 349 10.9 0.0 C 0.3 Intersection Delay = 0.3 sec /veh �f2T±iY:' sa ..: ✓1:htti,'.�'..'::i4^,:'..�:.; 1'.v. ti-4ASaf'S: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECTS NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS . z .re 2i 6D; • JUs U.O. aus J �i w0 a: D: . • • F- O Z�. o -t • ~O all U•co:: • O. Z• GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECTS RECEIVED MAY 0 5 '1997 DEVELOPMENT ....... • NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 17311 -135th Avenue NE, A -500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (206) 486.1669 • Fax 481 -2510 March 19, 1997 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architects 1800 - 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse Tukwila, Washington NCA File No. 197997 Dear Rick: Snohomish County (206) 337 -1669 WenatcheelChelan (509) 784.2756 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the planned Outback Steakhouse. The site is located in the west parking lot of the DoubleTree Hotel at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, in the city of Tukwila, Washington. You have requested that we prepare this report to provide geotechnical recommendations for the foundations of the new building. You have provided us a faxed copy of the site showing the building footprint. We have also obtained a geotechnical report prepared for the DoubleTree Hotel, by Roger Lowe Associates Inc., dated October 20, 1978. The planned building will be an approximately 6,000 square foot, single -story restaurant, located in front of the DoubleTree Hotel. We are not aware of the planned slab elevation, but expect that it will be 1 or 2 feet above the parking lot elevation. The structure will be a wood - framed building without masonry veneers. Entry porches will be on the north and west sides of the building. You expect typical foundation loading conditions. The existing hotel structure is supported by a deep pile system. Our investigation found on the order of 17 feet of moderately compact fill. We discussed potential settlements and foundation systems. You have indicated that "floating" the structure is preferred over the use of pile foundations. ' Z! • W • J V' c.� O ti N W; J F; W • Nom` CJ: Far- ' _;• Z 2 .O �W W =-- U; Z'.- • • 'O ~` • • The geologic units mapped for this area are shown on the Geologic Map of the Seattle and Vicinity, King County. Washington, by Howard H. Waldron, Bruce A. Liesch, Donal R. Mullineaux, and Dwight R. Crandell (U.S.G.S., 1961). The surface soils are classified as alluvial deposits. The Roger Lowe Associates Inc. geotechnical report describes the native soils at depth to be alternating shoreline and NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. • Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 3 swamp deposits, above glacial till. Our explorations encountered similar materials, but we did not extend into the glacial till. Subsurface Conditions Subsurface conditions were explored at the site by drilling two borings using a hallow -stem auger drill rig. The borings were located on the east and west sides of the building footprint to obtain soil samples for analyses. Samples in the borings were obtained using a 2.5 -inch, inside diameter, "California" ringed sampler. The sampler was driven beyond the bottom of the auger to obtain relatively undisturbed samples, using a 140 -pound hammer dropped 30 inches. A 2 -inch, outside diameter, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler was used in the native soils in Boring 2 (B -2) for liquefaction evaluation. The borings were located in the field by a geologist with this firm, who classified the soils encountered and maintained logs of the explorations. The boring locations are shown on Figure 2. A detailed explanation of the field exploration program and the exploration Togs are presented in Appendix A. The site is overlain by a heterogeneous mixture of loose to medium dense, brown to blue -gray, silt, sandy silt and silty fine sand with clay and gravel. These soils extend to a depth of about 17 feet, and have been interpreted to be fill. The fill was identified in the boring logs for the hotel, therefore, it has been in place for more than twenty years. Below the fill, we encountered a medium dense, dark gray to black, very fine sand to very fine sand with silt. The sand is interpreted to be alluvial deposits that range from the bottom of the fill to about 27 feet in depth. Below the sand, we encountered a medium stiff to stiff, dark gray to brown silt with some fine sand seams. The silt deposit is approximately 12.5- to 25.0 -feet- thick and appears to pinch out towards the west or the valley wall. Underlying the silt deposit and to the bottom of our explorations, we encountered a dark gray to black, medium dense to very dense, fine to medium sand with silt, clam shells and gravel. This type of soil appears to be some type of shoreline material. The top of the sand with shell layer was encountered in B -1 and B -2 from 52. and 42 feet below the surface, respectively. The previous geotechnical report for the hotel shows that a glacial till material underlies the sand with shells layer. We did not extend to these soils. Hydrologic Conditions We encountered ground water at about 17.5 feet in both of the borings. This water is expected to represent a regional ground water table. The ground water levels will fluctuate some during the year. NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 4 DISCUSSION ON SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF THE EXISTING FILL We did not observe significant distress in the parking lot area, and noticeable settlement is not occurring between the surrounding surface features and the pile supported hotel structure. The existing fill appears to be somewhat compact in its existing condition, with minor amounts of surface settlement. These observations, along with our drilling information, indicate that the fill is not significantly consolidating. For the type of structure planned, we do not expect significant settlement contribution from the underlying native soils. Our concern with the existing fill is that it is difficult to confidently characterize its engineering properties. Even if the two borings were representative of the range of fill characteristics across the site, potential settlement could not be estimated with standard geotechnical procedures. Instead, it would be estimated empirically, based on experience with past performance of other uncontrolled fills and existing conditions. For this case, total settlement could be estimated empirically, but it would not be known how much of the total potential settlement had already taken place since the time that the fill was initially placed. If the two borings were not representative of the existing fill, additional unknowns would be realized. These include: • the areal extent of fill • the range of total depths of fill • the material type and consistency • depth to, and thickness of, compressible zones • possible existence of voids, debris or highly organic zones • possible existence of well compacted fill, or dense native soil Accordingly, it is difficult for us to estimate an amount of maximum potential settlement because of the many unknowns that exist. Normally, when we evaluate settlement potential of uncontrolled fill, we provide a reasonable estimate based on our experience with other fills. A common fill situation used for such estimates is uncompacted soil placed behind retaining or subsurface walls. We have observed consolidation of these fills of up to 1 to 2 inches for 8- foot -high walls. Extrapolating this settlement performance relationship to conditions observed in the two borings at your site, we estimated that up to 2 to 5 inches of settlement could occur with, or without foundation loads. However, the fill on site seems more compact than fill observed to settle at the 2 -inch value. If the borings were not representative, greater or lesser settlements could be experienced. Our evaluation of the consistency of the borings is NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 5 based on our observation of the differential settlements of the surrounding features. We do recognize that since the fill has been in place for a number of years, some of the settlement is expected to have already occurred. The risk of settlement could be reduced by excavating some of the existing fill and replacing it with structural fill. For preliminary evaluation of foundation support alternatives, we estimate that for overexcavation of existing fill to a depth of about 2 to 4 feet and replacement with structural fill, a "realistic" design settlement for this site would be on the order of about 1 to 2 inches. There is a potential that this settlement estimate could be exceeded. The need to overexcavate the fill 3 to 4 feet could be evaluated during construction, based on the near - surface soil conditions observed. • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that the building can be constructed with conventional shallow spread foundations, provided the owner assumes the risk of settlement. The settlements can be reduced by overexcavating the existing one footing width or 2 feet below the footing, whichever is greater, and replacing the excavated soil with a imported granular structural fill. This will create a compacted fill pad under the building. The process will remove some of the compressible soil, and provide a compacted mat that will promote more uniform (lower differential) settlement. We estimate the potential settlements to be on the order of 1 to 2 inches with this overexcavation alternative, based on the thickness, age of the fill and the consistency found in our borings. We would expect that the impact of this settlement could be reduced by constructing a suitably reinforced foundation system, that would spread out differential movement within the structure. It is our opinion that it would be best to support the entire structure, including slabs, on this foundation. If the risk of settlement can not be accepted, then the foundation should be supported by a deep foundation system. We expect that piles will be on the order of 50 to 60 feet in depth. Design recommendations for a pile foundation system could be provided, if needed. Support of slabs -on -grade (if used) will be dependent to a certain extent on settlement tolerance. The least amount of settlement would be associated with the removal of a large portion of the underlying fill and replacement with structural fill. The highest risk of settlement would be to place the slabs on the existing grade. In our opinion, a good intermediate solution would be to remove at least 2 feet of fill in the underlying slab areas and compact the resulting surface to 90 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). A layer of structural fill would be placed on the compacted surface. The excavated fill NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 6 soils could be reused, provided they are of suitable moisture content to be compacted to acceptable standards. If these soils are to be reused, we recommend the stockpiles be covered with plastic to protect it from rainfall. The Puget Sound region is classified as a Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code. Seismic considerations for this type of site include liquefaction potential and attenuation of ground motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand and silty sand with a high ground water table. The effects of a liquefaction event could result into settlement of the structure. A detailed liquefaction analysis has not been conducted, however, because of the medium dense, sandy soils and the fill cap across the site, we expect the liquefaction potential to be low to moderate. On a nearly level site such as this, liquefaction damage is related to settlements. Placing the structure on foundations reinforced to withstand potential settlement of the fill will, in effect, also reduce the impact of liquefaction, if it were to occur. Site Preparation and Grading The near - surface fill soils are considered moderately to highly moisture sensitive, and will be difficult, if not impossible to work with when wet. If construction takes placed during wetter months, additional cost will be incurred from the need of importing rock spalls and select fill. Footings should be prepared in accordance with our recommendations in the Foundations sub - section of this report. We expect that import material such as "pit run" will be needed in the overexcavation areas below all footings. If site conditions are wet, a layer of 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls may be needed on the exposed subgrade. Using the slab preparation of removing 2 feet of existing fill, we recommend that the bottom of the excavation be compacted to a firm condition, and to 90 percent of its maximum dry density. Areas that are observed to weave under the compaction equipment should be repaired, as determined necessary. Most likely, repairs would consist of removal and replacement with a suitable material. If site conditions are wet, the most suitable material would be 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls or another similar product. The use of existing fill in the slab areas will depend on the quality of the material and if the soil can be kept dry. NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. { • Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 7 This could be better evaluated at the time of construction. Even during the summer, some drying may be necessary. This fill would need to be removed from the building area if it is too wet for compaction. If the heavily reinforced floating foundation is used and the slabs are designed to span across the footings, specific slab preparation will not be necessary. Structural Fill General: All fill that is placed beneath buildings, pavements or other settlement sensitive features should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in -place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free draining granular soil, free of organics and other deleterious material, and should be well graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches. Imported all weather fill should contain no more than about 5 percent fines (soil finer than a U.S. No. 200 sieve), based on that fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve. It may be more appropriate to use a gravel or rock spall backfill. These types of materials do not require compaction, and can be placed in wet environments. The near - surface fill soils contain a significant amount of fine- grained particles, and are considered highly moisture sensitive. The use of these soils as structural fill should be limited to extended periods of dry weather. Even during periods of dry weather, some discing for drying and watering may be necessary to achieve the desired moisture content. We recommend that these soils be considered for fill only if construction takes place during the drier summer months. Fill Placement: Following subgrade preparation, placement of the structural fill may proceed. All backfilling should be accomplished in 8- to 10- inch -thick uniform lifts. Each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying building areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density in this report refers to that density as determined by the ASTM D 1557 compaction test procedure. The moisture content of the soils to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum, so that a readily compactable condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. : •Z • iw • 6D, -J ••U 0; co ua • wz g 1 • • Z 0. Z uji Z 1— O N1' Al! W; • • .H U'. u. ~O Z U N` _:.• :O F'' Z 1 Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 8 remove wet soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. Because of the total depth of fill on site and the relative thickness of the structural fill, some relaxation of compaction may be appropriate, based on observations by the geotechnical engineer during construction. If the solution of removing 2 feet of the underlying fill is used, it is our opinion that the compaction criteria could be reduced to 90 percent in slab areas without significantly impacting the performance of the slabs. We recommend that all slabs that are supported on these conditions have some minimal reinforcement. Foundations Based on our discussion, we consider that it is feasible to support the structure on shallow spread footings. These footings should be founded on a zone of imported, granular structural fill which replaces a portion of the existing fill. The zone of structural fill should extend a minimum of one footing width or 2 feet below the bottom of the footing, whichever is greater. The excavation should extend outside of the footings a minimum of 0.5 foot for every 1.0 foot of the depth of the overexcavation. For example, the width of the trench for an overexcavation of 2 feet should extend a minimum of 1 foot on each side of the footings. Footing areas should be free of ponded water and sloughed or water loosened soils, prior to placement of footing concrete. We recommend an allowable design soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for footings that are constructed as described above. All footings should be sized according to the anticipated wall or column loads, and the above soil bearing values. Minimum footing widths of 18 and 24 inches are recommended for all continuous and isolated footings, respectively. A one -third increase in the above allowable bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. For the recommended site preparation, fill placement and foundation support, we estimate that a realistic potential settlement for this site would be on the order of about 1 to 2 inches. It is possible that this estimated settlement value could be exceeded. Although observation of the site features indicates that this is a low probability. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and subgrade, or the passive earth pressure acting on the below -grade foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be placed "neat" NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. •z z. .6 V' • 00 co o.. cn w,• w =; JH: N LL, w 0, �Q; • Z CJ. E-1 z � z o. ww •;0 / 0 F-; w w:. H V'. LL o: w •O H z Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 9 against the undisturbed soil, or backfilled with a clean, free draining, compacted structural fill. We recommend that a lateral soil pressure of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) equivalent fluid density be used. An allowable coefficient of friction between footings and the subgrade of 0.35 may be used. These values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Slabs -on -Grade All slab areas should be constructed on subgrade prepared as described previously. Where subgrade fill exists that is not compacted to the 90 percent criteria, additional reinforcing should be used to resist differential settlement. Where moisture control is important, we recommend that all floor slabs be underlain by 6 inches of free draining sand or gravel, for use as a capillary break. We recommend that the capillary break be hydraulically connected to the footing drain, to allow free drainage from under the slab. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the sand or gravel. The vapor barrier is very important, and a conscious effort should be made to place it correctly. A 2- inch -thick sand blanket may be used to cover the vapor barrier to aid in curing of the concrete. The capillary break and vapor barriers should be used regardless if the slab is supported on grade or designed to span between foundations. Drainage We recommend that runoff from impervious surfaces such as roofs, driveway and access roadways be collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. It is also recommended that perimeter footing drains be installed at the base of exterior footings for moisture control. The ground surface adjacent to the building should be sloped to divert surface water away from the structure. . If footing drains are incorporated into the design, they should consist of a 4- inch - diameter, perforated plastic pipe located adjacent to the footing. The pipe should be embedded in 12 inches of washed rock or pea gravel. The washed rock should be covered with a suitable geotextile fabric before the excavation is backfilled. The roof drains should be tightlined separate of the footing drains, until the tightline is a minimum of 1 foot vertically down gradient from the footing drains. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Mr. Rick Lentz of Merrick Lentz Architects, for use in planning and design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. • _ Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 10 bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We should be retained to provide monitoring and consultation services during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and our recommendations. As part of our services, we would evaluate conditions at the time of construction and provide recommendations specific to those conditions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Rick B. Powell, PE Project Engineer DJB:RBP:CPC:dfr Three Figures One Appendix Three Copies Submitted EXPRESS, -tZ-9R 1 Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Engineer NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. N VICINITY MAP 1 G H 518 ippwwwiiiloi"-- —....iiir 40� , 5 TUKW ILA VANS BLACK EVANS 9 \ ill BAKER �tu 163RD � \ STRANDE vi z Ul r- N CC U 6 1'L}L— Project Site CORPORATE ©1995 Thomas Bros. Maps NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS ENVIRONMENTAL Outback FIGURE 1 FILE NO. 197997 DATE FEBRUARY 1997 AND SCIENTISTS 0— Z (1) N March 1997 r m Q • JO_ s31lns ls3no 3a11318noa m z a 1 ONI)121`dd <4 -Or AVM>12Ped 1N3OH1f OS 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 CO CD cr 11" U C) M \ o w L o 0 D 2 11 Q 0..... u. O o a= C 1.= . � - lii W N 1 I I f13 n_ N CO W i I I U h. �/� ��, C 1 ! I .0 CA 0 o 0 i ! � is I 4) O ! CU ,co. i Z I Z' I I I f/) ! I I% I I • 1 % I 1 % I \ ! I • . \ 1 I \ • 1 \ ! I \ 1 1 \. I 1 1I I Building Location Sand with Sh ti clco co CNI C Assumed ground surface datum of 200 feet. d z W J LL CU 1 ti W °WC,) I� (9J w 3 Cjws Q w cao j•zJ 52 J ' O� ♦� y O • •":•':: APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING The soil conditions were evaluated by drilling two borings. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan. A geologist from this firm was on site during the explorations. The geologist located the explorations approximately, and maintained logs of the soils encountered. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented as Figure A-1. Representative soil samples were collected for further review and classification. The boring logs are shown in Figures A-2 through A-5. We have also included in this appendix boring B-1 from the Roger Lowe Associates report. The borings were drilled using a hollow stem auger drill rig. Samples in Boring 1 (B-1) and the top 14 feet of B-2 were, obtained using a 3-inch, outside diameter, split spoon (California type) sampler. Representative, relatively undisturbed ring samples were obtained for further evaluation and testing in our laboratory. The samples at depth in B-2 were obtained using a 2-inch, outside diameter, split spoon sampler. Both samplers were driven using a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. The sampler was driven 18 inches when possible. The blow count to drive the sampler the last 12 inches is shown on the boring logs. The 2-inch sampler with the above driving criteria is called the Standard Penetration Test (SPT). The purpose of our laboratory testing program is to establish the engineering properties of the subsurface soils. The testing included moisture content and dry density tests. The results are shown on the boring logs. z 'ce 2i 0 O 0; Lir u.: w 0 g - a • 111 'Z I- , 0 Z I-1 IL n ,C) ui! I 0, I- IL - 0 Z Fc. :z ,- i UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR AJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO. 200 SIEVE GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO.4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL - GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY-GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSES NO, 200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS • PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS 1) Field classification Is based on visual examination of soil in general Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry accordance with ASTM D 2488 -83. to the touch Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2) Soil classification using laboratory tests Is based on ASTM D 2487 -83. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, 3) Descriptions of soli density or usually soil is obtained from consistency are based on below water table interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, INC. GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A -1 . -- AND ENVIRONMENTAL z z. 6 D JU 00: N0 V W Ill h" W 0: LL Q' N Z0 �Lu ? H 0 w ~' o; 0 —: W- = U` u. 111 UN z B,1 Surface Elevation: U vi w a ¢ co o w ce w 0 in 1 Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 5 10 50 100 Asphalt (2.5 ") / ML /SM Sp ML /SP E I if 1 a- — mc=17.7% — DD =97.3 — On R6ck • Heterogenous mixture of brown to blue -gray silt, sand silt, and silty fine sand with clay and gravel (loose to dense or stiff to hard, moist) (Fill) -15a7k gray very line sand with silt and-trace roots (medium dense, wet) Recovery- • Dark gray to brown silt with fine sand seams and organics (stiff, wet) mc= 20.6% 5 DD =110 — — _ me =15.0% 10 — DD =119 — me =7.5% 15— — 21/7/97 me 27,1% --- DD =98.4 20 — 25 — — 30 me 53% DD =70.0 _ — LEGEND me Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ib/ft3) Impervious seal P Sample pushed Water level TV Torvane reading, tons /ft Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons /ft between soil types and the transition may be gradual. 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit a 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic limit NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, INC. GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS Outback FIGURE A -2 FILE NO. 197997 DATE February 1997 AND ENVIRONMENTAL Draltingt 7.cdr B-1 (cont.) U ii w CL cn o D w z ce W 0 D Penetratio Resistanc (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) ) • Blows per foot Surface Elevation: 1 5 10 50 100 Dark gray to brown silt with fine sand seams and organics ML /SP — (medium stiff, wet) - - 35— E _ 40 — -.7 2.5' of — :: heave — me :49°% — DD:77.3 45 - -No Recovery-- E heave — — 50-- Dark gray to black, fine to medium sand with silt, clam shells, gravel, and trace silt seams SM ] -- — (medium dense to very dense, wet) 55 1[ --- 50(5u) 60 - -No Recovery— — 55(6') • Boring was completed at 63.5 feet on 2/17/97 — Ground water was encountered at 17.5 feet LEGEND me Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ib /ft0) 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit Impervious seal P Sample pushed a 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic limit S Water level TV Torvane reading, 1 tons /ft Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons /ft NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual. FIGURE NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Outback A -3 CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS FILE NO. DATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL 197997 February 1997 flraf,an\1Q7QQ7 Mr ;•.• ' '• B_2 Surface Elevation: U vi SAMPLES I GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. • Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 1 5 10 . 50 100 Asphalt (2.5 ") SM /ML • 1 I[ 1E E _ — me =24.4% — — 5- - Disturbed _ - Disturbed _ 10— me =16.2° — DD:98.7 — me :15.8°% 15— _ . — — — _ — Results from 3" O.D. . • \ / . d Sampler ! ,, Results SPT �� —► from Sampler • • • Heterogenous mixture of brown to blue -gray silty fine sand with clay and gravel (loose to dense or stiff to hard, moist) (Fill) Dark gray to black very fine sand with silt and trace organics (loose to medium dense, wet) SP -SM „j_ L I 2/77/97 me :32.7% 20— ` ,'/ i . 25 2.5'of Heave — — - _ _ _ Dark gray silt interbedded with organics (medium stiff to stiff, wet) ML Ime 30— =51°% LEGEND me Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ib /ft3) Impervious seal P Sample pushed Water level TV Torvane reading, limit tons /ft Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons /ft between soil types and the transition may be gradual. 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit ( Dash Line) 31 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic Solid Line) ( NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, INC. GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS 'FIGURE Outback A -4 FILE NO. 197997 DATE February 1997 AND ENVIRONMENTAL 1-.z; '0 o'; .0, U).0! : .0 uJ . J I... :C/) LLi :'w 0: • a o Z1-; I— O z I-; .w w; :20 � 0 ;w W uL • —Z 0 Hi z ...:.: • _J 'B -2 Cont. Surface Elevation: U cry n SAMPLES GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 1 5 10 50 100 Dark gray silt interbedded with organics (medium stiff to stiff, wet) ML L L me =°/9 - Disturbed _ = et 1 t t k .. .` • • ■ ■ ■ ■ 50(6") 50(3 ") • 1 1 1 I 35 — — = 40— — — 45— 50- -- . _ — — - — Gray fine to coarse sand with gravel, silt, clam shells, and cobbles (dense to very dense, wet) . SP -SM 11 7 Boring was completed at 53.3 feet on 2/17/97 where there was refusal on cobbles Ground water was encountered at 17.5 feet 55 — 60 LEGEND limit between soil types me Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ib /ft3) Impervious seal P Sample pushed S Water level TV Torvane reading, tons /ft 1 Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons /ft and the transition may be gradual. 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit _LL 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, INC. GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS Outback FIGURE A -5 FILE NO. 197997 DATE February 1997 AND ENVIRONMENTAL inp�197997. : z Doubletree Lodge October 20. 197R Plate A -2 BORING ONE ELEVATION 36 (LOCAL DATUM) DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT 1 1 2 3 3 4 GRAPHIC LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION AY NEOUS T) UNDER- TERIAL TRACE LAYERS MOIST) ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. I LOG OF EXPLORATION ML SM SOD AT 3 INCHES HETEROGENOUS MIXTURE OF BROWN AND G1: 22.1 100 28 11111 SILT, SANDY SILT AND SILTY SAND WITI- GRAVEL, ORGANIC MATTER AND MISCELLA DEBRIS (SOFT TO DENSE) (MOIST TO WE (FILL) 29.7 94 9 11111 0- 15.8 126 40 11111 OCCASIONAL SEEPAGE FROM PERCHED GROUNDWATER 29 Q APPROXIMIMATE PIEZOMETRIC HEAD IN 16.4 116 36 11111 LYING SAND LAYERS 5- 10.5 130 46 11111 OCCASIONAL LAYERS OF VERY DENSE M D- 17.9 93 38 11111 SM DARK GRAY VERY FINE SILTY SAND WITH OF ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM DENSE, WET 34.6 87 16 11111 DARK BROWN ORGANIC SILT TO SILT WITH 99.0 44 14 IIIR ML OF SILTY PEAT (SOFT TO MEDIUM STIFF, 5- OCCASIONAL SILT ZONE 44.5 76 11 11111 AY NEOUS T) UNDER- TERIAL TRACE LAYERS MOIST) ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. I LOG OF EXPLORATION .Doubletree Lod October 20. 1978 • BORING ONE CONTINUED DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN • MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG P lslte A 1 SOIL DESCRIPTION D E LT L ROGER LOWE RSSOCIRTES INC. L .LOG OF EXPLORATION 5 X ‘1 45— GRADES WITH SOME CLAY 52.6 70 11 11111 50— SP GRAY SAND TO SILTY SAND WITH SHELLS AIN SM OCCASIONAL ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM DENS 26.9 96 11 11111 TO DENSE, WET) \ 55— 21.6 89 38 11111 SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE OF SILT AND SHELLS (DENSE, WET) 60- 35 11111 65— GRADES WITH GRAVEL 15.2 125 84 11111 70— SW GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH SOME SI 100/5" 11111 AND GRAVEL (VERY DENSE, WET) 75— ML GRAY SANDY SILT TO SILT WITH OCCASION) 25.4 101 136 11111 GRAVEL (VERY STIFF, MOIST) D E LT L ROGER LOWE RSSOCIRTES INC. L .LOG OF EXPLORATION Doubletree Lodge October 20, 1978 • DEPTH IN MOISTURE FEET CONTENT 85 BORING ONE CONTINUED DRY BLOWS DENSITY PER GRAPHIC (PCF) FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION Plate A- 155/8" I111L_ BORING COMPLETED AT 83.2 FEET ON 8/14/78 4 ROGER LOWE RSSOCIRTES INC. I LOG OF EXPLORATION 0 .00001- .00011- .00oa= 000n= .00«x= .00o. __ .00001- .000.1- CIF AVM>bdd 2131N37HJMOs snoH)dals >1oda110 MaN MIA 1VNO11235 3115 531115 15319 330111319100 1 -- 1 ----- -I- - -- r) J Y pN d .$ h N J a le. °a:£:S r in2ive &=svp:A 'w14,Aali'3 reiu'`3=sik• ",',, d slti'° *id's'S& vit, tilt` alt iH siin' t4t'.a ^' w,r • ai}:� .:4a'2b�. MAY 15 INT COWArry DEV 'MLGAPF d' 1 (ONE) NEW S/F ILLUM. WALL SIGN ALUMINUM CABINET PAINTED WHITE 'OUTBACIC 3" OPEN PAN CHANNEL FABRICATED LETTER INSIDE RETURNS & LETTER PAINTED42-212 SCARLET RED OUTSIDE RETURNS PT. RONAN BLUE #516 LETTERS HAVE 15MM CLEAR RED 30 MA DOUBLE STROKE NEON 'STEAKHOUSE' 5"-CHANNELUME LETTERS RED(ACRYLITE #209) ACRYLIC FACES, & RONAN #516 BRILLIANT BLUE RETURNS 15MM CLEAR RED NEON 30 MA HORIZONTAL LINES- OPEN CHANNEL PAINTED SCARLETT RED WITH 15 MM CLEAR RED NEON(SINGLE TUBE) FIELD VERIFY 14ff4in OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE ROOF UNE ACCENT -OPEN CHANNEL PAINTED RED W/ 15MM CLEAR RED NEON(SINGLE TUBE) FOOTAGE FROM ARCHITECTS FULL SCALE DRAWINGS OUTBACK 600 EAST 1STAVENUE SPOVAN!. %ABINGTON 99202 (609) 624,2119 TftYonC *W on for .w.+9 w aat c.d by.. Iks5 florsfarro by Sae d Int as O adNYnot robSw fROralueecl hcrrymanse WM./ Pe"ribion from Nem Sirs 5-7-97 DATE 1/2"=1 r-0" SCALE CUSTOMER APPROVAL DATE BY LANDLORD APPROVAL DATE BY 1 1 9 1 1 1 0 N 1 M. CAMPBELL DRAWN IT WEST ELEVATION OUTBACK M. MCKINLAY SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA SP -14797 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TOTHE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT._. AS REQ,— I 20 ft 0 in -OUTBACK_ STEAKHOUSE ONE NEW DIF INT, ILLUM, DISPLAY ALUMINUM CABINET PAINTED WHITE "OUTBACK" 3" OPEN FAN CHANNEL FABRICATED LETTER INSIDE RETURNS & LETTER PAINTED42-212 SCARLET RED OUTSIDE RETURNS PT. RONAN BLUE #516 LETTERS HAVE 15MM CLEAR RED 30 MA DOUBLE STROKE NEON "STEAKHOUSE" 5"-CHANNELUME LETTERS RED(ACRYLITE #209) ACRYLIC FACES, & RONAN #516 BRILLIANT BLUE RETURNS 15MM CLEAR RED NEON 30 MA HORIZONTAL LINES - 3" OPEN CHANNEL PAINTEDSCARLETT RED WITH 15 MM CLEAR RED NEON(SINGLE TUBE) POLE PT. WHITE Heath Signs CO6M$T 1ST MOM !T'ONANI, WIWINOTON 94707 PO9) 674,4449 Ree s a, algInd dwell 5-7-97 ceded fa M glit4AM 1� al M WIafM. 1t1f tar/"ed Prude al elle are wlreed axle le not to reproduced In crer donne elem. perrileren Own Hem Skis DAVE 1 /2"=1'-0" "OAl" REVISIONS M. CAMPBELL OUTBACK M. MCKINLAY SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA DRAWN IY SALI$ t1Ae! SP -1 47A-9 :,'I54VW"fG;ilwe w rt.G:,.a"ialfiatil�',7�Vk3`�a�,t��.zin... 1 SIZZLeR ECt7Gatta I'+Nnr CONFAT MOAT JOa,TI • OMINMY taR aAo A I\ A I\ IS ,ANTARTNNW �4MVD* I0Y 1I1, 4.0 MIDI IOM ,A, ww RliltaiM MAII SOUTNCENTER rARKWAY ?ARKINb CALCULATIONS owT.r lmam /..0. MONO NACU, ~VONT MVO= PCOMI:DIWK8/0. Iola. rl,TAa1lMR. TOTAL 1Mao110 FAA.* wKRY. 321 NNIS NAG, PIM viola weave NO NANO ill, NAO, Pet 11000 NI II TPAL3 Pan CO 21.2 260 NANO IN OG NAW n.«.1132! .apt ruw 11—c.10114.1 M0NW1G--i LIC 0.1000' DNTANft AOM }rlGT 1110I132TT 0.101 roma last MONT= MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT IW -Kam n..iloyeki• M. IN OWN VN/TO—SIT Ira•tfO7-1149 • RlNTM, /MKW 10 1a1:1111 Mr) Ia,T. PAVAN, TOR ,0,019 PROJECT NAR Aw 1.,,RTAna TO a wrvo Odor r0, To -9 TT.. • LOO_ VICINITY USE MAP Mown II La T.A0 '0. Oaf Too 11Q 00 PI Win To Ip1Aw [ASTIfi SITE PLAN scAa.e...iaa .7171-1. povBLETREE SUE5T SUITES 1rlrrrM INN NI.L< ALLOA1a1 ANSA IGw ME rNw no V.M Mae Mx 1w010Io mamma*00Imaw. 1NV Mi,.. Go. WC was 11. Tara. 1104. Vii/ �.:i.► Ll liJL!`LaW LJ`il STEAKHOUSE ,Nw *ow Pc. re °_ w No eoun CEM81 PAIKWAY TUCWLA, WA a DRAWING TITLE SITE ,LAN DATE %OY!!RM O. ISS DRAIN RV K ammo BY . IREVISIONS ELEVATION - raiz 516,4 .NAIL INT • iu0. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. A -I . . . • . • . • , *. • • . • . • . ' : • . • -SOUTi4CE&ITER PARIGUAy. 01.410PC• KAP O... POIPCP IDOZ •woorcr • MERRICK LENTZ ARC ITTcT PPP PIPP-4.••••••••• • . •••••••••• sop nos .•••• • .334.3.10 AP • 9;••••,—.,3 ••••••D .1..••••• Va....9212 Rome .1••••,g9 :MS TYPICAL PLANTING DETAILS 0.0UESLETREE GUEST SUITES 01.• - PIP• Su. 204/70 -3,177 10.; •••/747. 40••••••• ••••I•gtp WOW ) PROJECT NAME • .•":kuTHCENTER PARKWAY ".* '•:DRAWING TITLE PLANTING LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN" , , ....: ' ... foam ••••••• .• re.•••• •••••••••s•p•••••• i• ma* or dr...a row op. pe pproop . • ' .- .. • , tor.•••• •••••••0 PP •••••••••poril ........e. NI • • _ . ` ...,-,-.1-.. • . . ,, i ‘• / PP,. PPPrIPN .PP...??...• ••••• Pal*. OP op.; p ow., • . •. • • Poo. pro?. Nowa 0...0.-7 ' IP . .. ' • .. • . .• . . - • . . . ra CO,. • .....,33444. %Dere. • • • • . . . . . , P 0••• • PpPoPPPIPP ...rpm 111. p P...,•• . 0 no.o.• .4.0...• opan, OPP.= 0•SPPGIPP 3 o•L c••••••.7•10,3x.. • ' . '. NOTES ' . .. . . . • • . . . .. • . • . . r • o • . 'p L Porol. r•PPs pal one pr•••• I. • P. ow ••••o • orl prop., p.. app. P ....!9 ............ .9 9..... 9 .......s 3 p...•••••.t.ur.A. -. - l• PPP., on.. Pe 4••••••• O. 4•••• 3 •• or *es • • • . . 0 0••••••• 4.634...V.120..... g 044...• 1•••.....p. 4.c. . • 3 109 pew pp• • Pop «2 ••••• Po po or op "Popo o• wow. Poo • p.p.. sr Prow bp.P.p.. pop. poi &prow to vo a .... sp. A a • • Yu. ea.. 40,...... 4 6....0.1 a ......• "POO .• • rsco•otoct*: ...pow*, se• ...............,...• ta•••9 e. ••• pp. Y. .. "L •••••••.".. "................7.1.0•04 . 3, Pa PP. IV pc. IP • . IWO PP•••••4 pap IPP.• pa woo. - '• • - v.... t....Tot • 1111,........ro, PP . 4 •33%..""'......• . ........"33........ save, ..• pal NM or •••••••••• ouorni pep •••••Ppg PP., wom. 99.;••;• •,•• .......•••;...i... IIIMIIIIM .8.9.0,4•• ..09.9••••••••19. • pt.• ,... /Pm r• pop... poop. ' • • ar. Po P.4...a. sr. p•cpAri• p.p... re prop.43.04,....4.3.4. • • ppg••• ...410.4. .....••••••4 43......1 pm.. Woe. Poo., Po • • • • • . . • • 'Po Lae... 04.3 pomp. vol *pa •••• rpm Po 0••• •• rot fro ••00.0••••••• 11.61..copppro sot P. ser cm. I••• top 90 amyl. I . - ••••••••m. se trerwo• ...... ‘,...1, ... P......, ...........' ......51 ... P.,1*.o.......11,.... •••••••••• I, ••••••••••••• Gap. OPP. 3 as< ,.....r ...OPP ••••••••••••••Por, PP v //7/ A Pap ••••••13•4••••• Groop Pap •• pot. IP e.g. pu.• • P.p., pomp. . . er•••••••••P •• ••••••• . . . • • • • .• • . . . - . • . . . • . . 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT !S DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. PLAN • DATS PflORIJART E1. DRAWN BY • CHECKED BY . . REVISIONS . ''• - 21 • _iti NORTH ELEVATION a'4 5 - � ©EM O AEU! 1 nac au. oIn, MAWS In.rz A.11.PGT MERRICK LENTZ ARCIIIIIIIjITECT 2.6 CONFER•iouol m. 11 1 SOUTH ILIVAT ION IGLI. I.• • r.s KEY TO FINISH MATERIALS I0120A.A.Acwc w•21. D1rOO.oOa 0•OLO AUUAc COAT, O ROY aOO PL GOAT 'Ia,•OL r 12.000W d 012•0 rT..• ]. sOCO TOM PA.". ISM Dea rnD Aae.tc LAMA 10•0114., =DO WO, %CP COATS 2.1PM. CVOs CNC COAT n.a 1 IOcO Dpa.. tart SWOON Twit I•A.I A•O vA.+M r Fv.ada VIM .11 n..v 001.04 orc a•o ••.TIDE ... an. VAR WI.. ••••• raroAlw IMO nu+. I FOUL CO S. AAO.•.rW l army . RIG.WTLI DNce.nDO<s4.•a w» w•I OK*of COAT v' TL •tree KW,' AIDS UT.O WO row. roe vay. FOUL Ow.al NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT. IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO, THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. IW - IMS Mrs RA. 1.0I. IOC FMr 111121n/r SOMA Samar -3177 1AX110I/1117-79• PROJECT NAIR SCUTHCENTER PARCWAY TUKWLA WA DRAPING YTLK BUILDING ELEVATIONS DAR JANUARY 21. IDD1 DRAWN BY CJC CHECKED BY. REVISIONS 44.1 ITO TVI. Ccw.x.w.OMm. -02 up rO.C • o limmolloimpir-=010; ,.. TxOTVtm.'�='�oee©1fal 3 n111111511111 I 11111 :E•��•!s �_ I t� t WEST ELEVATION r"..•.••r.O. POO DOCM DRA .M ILLI ELLtiL TOLD 20.1..R OAOLIT MOO u10.1 MOOD TIs1 0 MOVE. MAT ARE NOT COPArCTID TO 114.340.1 OR STAOO. `•0* OF aL 24 . S• O . PRESSNQ MATZO FT. 601 STEEL '124* AT ATVOC 4'-4. OG STEEL TIE[ S TOR- 0AT.-COLT TO COG EAST ELEVATION �SEGTION - (RAIL)SCALL y0• • T -C (\SECTION - (COLu44.) KALE r • ro F?M.TKM.A 814.,4 pELEVATION - MAWSC.LE. SW • 12-43 OTO - .CO MA .o.oK m. 5 t� Tai. A•OZ. 8.81001.8E 11 FATED 1.4.1313110. TIE[ Ail ATVIC A'-43 OG STm. TUBE &TORT- E* !.(O•T TO COG i m MK.* PA. .t, es IP. M. MCA M.S. O 4004 . 02.0Me221 . a . w u. MOMS= OOP Mf .a sl. jeer TO FXTFIaOIE FMUM.' t L41100.• F.CKC 'O.O,.J MAW .POA -►40 .ATLC 1..,0,410+ COLOR >0>•. NOM. COOS CO MOM C.., 04 COAL T+.•R O• MTFCM.. 04 0.0.0 ITT,, 2. .41200 Tia PANTO UM n..011 •OCA W60.OKM104St r421.08•, CAA ✓1l. TWO COOS OP .••••• PV P. COOT.IRI •4LYO1000•1 TOR 01424 MMWYTnt MAYA MTF rot D• 00•0..OK S0 /80813 0. ✓..0.0.308 WA 34114E N..4 4 O APO FOC80 TVt MOl00f. PAMPA COM 11. ITT.. DOOM .0 MAK& PlOOTTINI� C *ATTA S10M, (0.A M.Of. TOO Cow. 1.0•0.1 P1. CPO CwT0 O4V�w OT..••Msw. GAL, PVT.. DETAIL - /e/EL.,+..+J MILEPOCALEI 1 N• • 12-C DELEVATION-J�1'"J 8''SCALE. 3N• . M1O• NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE ITIS_DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. .c 40 O»MT .o.ol *0813 MORIO MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT IMO - 33•2 l• M .R M... IN 402/741-31Tl2/1/7417-71 PROJECT NAME 8OUiHCSRBi PARKWAY TiJKWLA. WA. ORARTNC TITLE BUILDING ELEVATIONS 4-,4 DETAILS DATE JAI1.4kr T. 1371 DRAWN BY CSC CNECDED DY. REVISIONS 44.0 I I tr --I 1— — —1 — 10- 1 > (Ji w 5 -FARM% skIN LINE OF OVERHANG 0 ABOVE COVERED WALKWAY LD — EXISTING PARKIN& CHANGEEPT —AG -NOTED OTHERWISE --;(9-° RON. 4 PAINTED HARM IN 4" LETTERS, CABIN& s • M RETE.vgAct: 2H.53' . . 441.31' N 00°51148Vi 1-r3:Yj A NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. a) DOUSL.ETIREE GUEST SUITES ID LT1 1.D ID 51x51 AREA OF DETECTABLE NARNINE, SURFACE. EC 11064.6 IN6 BUTTONS (414)x3/4") SPACED 12" O.C. STAGGER EA. IN. 4 ROWS TYP. "INALKPIAY' ' NIGH EX. PLANTER TO EIN1ERATEI1 TE NEIN FLAME PAINTED WARN! IN 4' LETTERS, 2 AREA OF TECTABLE ACE. UDC II 1NG .4.8 ADOI ION EXIST f • NEW SI / NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. kICII I C) 1). a)