Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L96-0001 - LES SCHWAB - DESIGN REVIEWL96 -0001 LES SCHWAB TIRE 6804 S. 180TH DESIGN REVIEW Artvt Pktv(ou /lea ✓rl-L City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director January 26, 1996 Paul Casey Casey Group Architects 10116 36th Ave Ct #109 Tacoma, WA 98499 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, L96 -0001 Dear Paul: As you know, last night the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved the modifications to the Les Schwab Tire Store project. The modifications included painting the split face block, using scoring smooth block for the accent band, creating the pilaster details on the east elevation and adding trees in the parking lot and at the southwest corner of the building. The net result is that the final building design shall be consistent with the BAR approved design from December 14, 1995, except as modified last night. Your building permit is under review, currently in the Public Works Department. Before Planning can give a final sign off to the building permit, you will need to formally submit revisions for the permit to the Building Permit which meets the BAR approved design. If you have any questions in this matter, don't hesitate to call me at 431 -3663. S; cerely, J� n//gamerson Assc�relate Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z _�; i.. z; cc 2 U.O' CO O; co w w =. J W0 g ¢. Hw z �.-. F-- O' z� 2 uji i0 N' = • V': LL r;. • zs • w. o z I TO: FROM: RE: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM Board of Architectural Review Department of Community Deve ment Les Schwab Tire Store L96 -0001 Background Last week the Planning Division forwarded a .recommendation of denial of this project to the BAR, with the comment that we were going to meet with the applicant to further discuss the design. Modification to Application Following that meeting, the application as follows: 1. The color of the base of lighter. 2. The red accent band will be changed from split face block to a scored smooth concrete block. applicant has modified their the building was made somewhat 3. The depth on every other pilaster on the service bays and the entrance columns have been increased to provide greater relief and level of detail on the east elevation. 4. Additional landscaping will be provided. Two tree additional tree wells can be accommodated in the parking lot east of the building without loss of parking spaces and two additional shore pines can be provided at the southwest corner. 5. A low profile flower planter box around the base of the sign. The materials and color of the box will match the building. Additional exhibits identifying these changes will be presented at the meeting. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 ",fmp'�, ,+W +%•�t�!.wr wrenx�rrc..,+, vwnnn.,•. a. �m, w,..,• �,. nm .emc.- n."!mae9�Ye!��rt•a�.N,��m , , . •'1�S'7!:'AFrrN,»a� z Xw QQ 2 J V ,U O' U 0: uJ; • W =' J � ww O; LL Q' =d BAR Criterion The denial recommendation was based largely on the criterion related to avoiding monotony of design (TMC 18.60.050(4)(G). The changes address this concern: The subtle change in color of the pleasant contrast to the roof color. The smooth /scored accent band will contrast in texture. bottom band provides a provide an interesting The additional depth on the east elevation will provide added interest and shadow. The additional trees will soften the building. The flower box introduces a new element that ties in with the building. These changes, with other features such as the grid accent details, the scored block behind the grids and the entry detail, results in a variety of detail and visual interest consistent with the BAR criterion. Recommendation The Planning Division recommends the application as modified above be approved. •z 6 Ui • .00 o. ;CO w =; w o. 1.15; ' D. • ,,w _. z I- . z 17; al la iD W�. HV ?..• • 4 H. or z:. t' :S LF 2-' M! Jm2: f.[ U..'. GY. cGvN. r::!.'. S .Eb�1l�].bYSltii'Jeftl4:%Y,aKG4.' y:]GY'a3'Y+.firieV : iAidi3 �' •:Jnl�b�iUC•L]+�i :S.i_�•• -.+C Y.k:: i 1SiL'f 1:m;4Y..i" 1" JAN — 2 5 — 9 E. THU S 'x.45 THE CASEY P - O 2 000 The Casey Group Q0© Architects MO A Division of A.C.P. Consultants, Inc.. 10116 360) mc. Ct. SW.. Suite 109 Tacoma, Wa. 98499 (206)584.5207 Phone (206) 581.9720 Fax MemoPad from Paul J sey A.I.A. ®Memo J Ph Log 0 Confr. ❑ Info: Page 1 of I_ Distribution: Date: Project: Person: Company: Subject: January 25, 1996 Tukwila Les Schwab Store Mr. John Jimmcrson City of Tukwila Planning Project Revisions Time 8:45 am Project No. 95139 Phone No. (206) 431 -3663 Fax No. (206) 431 -3665 Sent Via Fax ® Mail ❑ Russ ® Les Schwab Any Kosterlitz Billing File 0 Pursuant to the discussions held in your office on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, we have made the following modifications to the project design drawings: 1. The 4 foot high building base split face block color will be the lighter shade of "terra- cotta", Sherwin Williams Paint color No. 2300. 2. The accent stripe located above the window head will be 8" high smooth face concrete block with vertical scores at 8" o.c and will be painted to match the building base color. 3. 16" wide by approx. 6" deep concrete block pilasters will be located between every other garage door located on the east side of the building. These pilasters will extend from the pavement to the bottom of the metal fascia. The two columns located at the building entry will also have the same shape of the pilaster for elevation continuity. 4. Two additional "shore pine" trees will be located at the southwestern corner of the building. The size of these trees will match the size of trees already planned elsewhere on the site. 5. Two additional "diamond shaped" landscape islands will be placed in the planting row located east of the building and will match the size of the planters already planned. One "Seedless Mb" tree will be placed in each island to match the trees already planned. 6. A 6 foot wide x 16 foot long x 3 foot high split face concrete block planter will be placed at the base of the signage pole. The concrete block will be painted to match the building base color. The steel sign pole will be painted the "almond" color to match the building exterior wall located above the 4' high base. One copy of the colored exterior elevations were delivered to you yesterday. A copy of sign elevation is attached for your records. Given the 9bove modifications, it is my understanding that your department will now be able to recommend approval of the current application to change the exterior of the building to painted concrete block. InMeMEMentinntsutztatemmmgatetecemettetastaratekvannamt .-,. —, .'Mrt,.tq.r...y.�q........... n+�...n'.!manR9.•4na ^.�., yY{..1)5*M'F':MMV z • Z � w U O U13: W Wt`' w WO J D. a �• w z� U � o M; w • w.. u.0. ui • N; z RSZletAci P2� �r� 7 044- (Zsfac Ski APPROVED if DATE I_ .-'I'- !NITIAI�S �- i . "ALMOND" COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING (SEE COLOR BOARD) NEW SPLIT FACE CMU BLOCK PLANTER (SEE COLOR BOARD) WITH CONCRETE CAP. 16'x&'x3' 1-IIG14 IIGN DEThIHL NOT TO scare 1 /2474Uo a 7.z. • w; J U: o o. N 0.. ' cnW: W Z: • wo' lL Q' =•d • ,1,- W. • • 1- "O Z~ p;. .o =Wt. z; z s R d a Q DATE .�P RO VE D : -P' -� INITIAL 3 ete(___ • • • • • • MIO • • • • ittsps PtLtioTER z. Q F=-Z: w. U oo (3, W= J ~; w O, N a; F- W. z F: 1- 0: Z �. ;11J w ;0 H. w w', H U' u'00! tuZ 0• z PLANNING COMMISSIONBOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MINUTES JANUARY 25, 1996 (Approved 3/28/96) Chairman Marvin called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members present were Commissioners Marvin, Livermore, Stetson, Neiss, and Meryhew. Mr. Malina was excused. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, John Jimerson, and Sylvia Schnug. There were no citizen's comments on items not included on the agenda. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 14,1995. MR. LIVERMORE SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. L95-0066: Good Guys Vernon Umetsu presented the staff report. The applicant is proposing to increase the wall sign size from 150 sq. ft. to 185 sq. ft. The applicant is allowed a sign of up to 355 sq. ft. per the Sign Code. Dana Warren, Segale; P.O. Box 88050, Tukwila: Mr. Warren stated that the proposed sign is smaller than the existing "Smith's" sign and clarified that it is the center -most "Smith's" sign which is being replaced. Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0066 AS PRESENTED, BASED UPON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MS. STETSON SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. L95 -0067: South Lot Development Vernon Umetsu presented the staff report. The proposal is for a cooperative parking lot agreement, which would reduce the minimum required parking from 491 parking spaces to 475 spaces. Mr. Umetsu clarified that the request shown on the cover page of the staff report should have been corrected pursuant to staffs analysis as to what is necessary in order to legally build the restaurant. That analysis is shown on page three. The total new parking requirement is 845 spaces for the Pavilion Mall, and 150 spaces for the proposed restaurant, equaling 995 spaces total. The site parking supply is shown as being 450 spaces on the main lot of the Pavilion Mall and the South Lot is proposed at 476 spaces; with a total of 934 spaces. This is a 61 space reduction or 6.13% reduction rmimss,.- ,ro_.....g..»azMUrnrs w:.ays..¢! Mrs.+a..s.,.vmmtKNR y.,,,t :antritrt 4 ?+i�'t. N.- W, ,terog9 l Wnrt,.°.,n z mow' re p. JU '00 W o' • J= E- LL., w • LLa za f—; Z • U Ill w ��. E"0. Z: w UW 0 17' z Planning Commission /BAR Minutes Page 2 January 25, 1996 and that is what should be reflected on the request. The applicant concurs with staff's analysis. The parking study submitted by the applicant demonstrates the adequacy of parking under existing conditions. Staff also reviewed the situation if the Mall were to have a level of customer activity equal to what is typically seen in the Southcenter CBD. That analysis concluded that the Mall provides 3.5 spaces per thousand gross square foot area, which is among the highest parking ratios provided by retail developments in the Southcenter area. Based upon that, staff feels there is adequate parking with the cooperative parking agreement, even considering the new restaurant going in and considering all operations would increase in customer activity in the future. Additional pedestrian access would be required once that increased customer activity occurred. Based on those findings and conclusions and the findings and conclusions of the applicant's parking study, staff recommends approval of the proposed cooperative parking agreement. The applicant will be leaving the stream on the southwest corner of the property open, rather than culverting it, and as a result, two parking spaces may be lost. The applicant has changed his request to reduce the parking load by 63 instead of 61 spaces. Mr. Meryhew asked if the stream would be fenced. Mr: Umetsu said it is not proposed to be fenced at this time, but could be if required. Steve Crocker, Tramell Crow, 5601 6th Ave. S., Seattle, Wa: Mr. Crocker stated that they agreed with staffs recommendations and conclusions. There were no citizen's comments. Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. The Commissioners agreed that they think parking will be adequate. Mr. Meryhew re- stated that he was concerned with fencing the stream. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0067: COOPERATIVE PARKING AGREEMENT BASED UPON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MS. STETSON SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Umetsu clarified that is a reduction in the minimum required parking from 995 to 932 spaces. z w. 00 o' w I' J � SQL w0 g a' (0 a; 7_ w; _. z F.; I- 0 Z I-; o - 0 H; w w'; _ p. W z 0 -, Planning Commission /BAR Minutes January 25, 1996 L95 -0058: Pavilion Mall South Lot Development Page 3 Mr. Umetsu presented the staff report. This proposal is for design approval of a 4.79 acre parking lot. The proposed design of the parking area is typified by a perimeter of 10 -15 feet of landscaping, with groundcover, shrubs, and large stature deciduous trees every 40 feet. The applicant has proposed Flame Ash trees for the perimeter, but staff has noted that the CBD Street Tree Plan requires Red Maples. Interior parking areas have been broken up with Cherry Trees. Pedestrian access to the interior parking spaces is provided by an eight -foot wide concrete walkway. The project is consistent with BAR criteria with the following exceptions: z re w', UO wz J 1 LL. 1. The Flame Ash Trees along Southcenter Pkwy. should be changed to Red w 0: Maples.: 2. All perimeter trees should be increased in size from the proposed 1-1/2" caliper u. a. to 2-1/2" caliper to be consistent with the level of initial design quality provided i d' by other developments in the CBD. w z m: 3. Site Lighting: o' z a. A minimum of 1 ft. /candle at the property line. o, b. Light poles shall not exceed the building height (approximately 20 ft.). c. Light fixtures shall be shielded so that there is no direct off -site illumination. i Mr. Livermore asked the size of the referenced bridge. z lb U =' Mr. Umetsu said it must be a minimum of six-feet wide in order to satisfy the CBD Z Sidewalk Ordinance. Mr. Marvin asked if the existing stand of trees will be removed and replaced. Mr. Umetsu said they would be removed and replaced with shrubs and deciduous trees. Steve Crocker, Tramell Crow, 5601 6th Ave. S., Seattle, Wa: Mr. Crocker stated he agreed with staffs recommendations and conclusions. Mr. Livermore asked what he thought about fencing the stream. Mr. Crocker said they didn't have a problem with fencing the stream. Mr. Umetsu stated that because of the tightness of the stream to the parking area, they would have to use a trellised system to screen the headlights from shining off -site. Mr. Crocker said they may have to lower the light standards. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes Page 4 January 25, 1996 Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. Mr. Livermore said he didn't have a problem with the project as long as the stream was fenced. The other Commissioners concurred. MR. LIVERMORE MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0058 BASED UPON THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STAFF AND ADDING ONE ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION THAT THE STREAM ON THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE BE SCREENED ADEQUATELY THAT NO CHILD CAN GET THROUGH. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Livermore disclosed that he was involved in indirect ex -parte communication regarding the Les Schwab Tire project. He received a phone call from Arlin Collins of C DA Architects. Mr. Livermore described their conversation for the record. He added that he felt the conversation has not influenced him, and he can render a fair decision on this application. There were no objections by the applicant or the audience to have Mr. Livermore hear and act on the Les Schwab proposal. L96- 0001 :: Les :Schwab Tire John Jimerson presented the staff report. The project was approved on December 14, 1995. Since then, the applicant decided that the color scheme they had presented was not appropriate and have requested this modification. Mr. Jimerson clarified that the only change they were making was a change from the split -faced block to painting over the blocks with a muted colonial red on the bottom band and an off -white almond color in the middle. The applicant is not proposing to alter the approved landscape plan. Staff felt the change in color would eliminated the texture and richness of the color. The applicant has agreed to add landscaping to soften the bays. The applicant has added depth to the entry columns and on every other pylaster on the service bays. The applicant has also provided a flower planter box around the base of the sign. It would be approximately six feet by sixteen feet. Mr. Livermore asked if the additional landscaping changes the ratio of parking. Mr. Jimerson said it does not change the parking. These changes have provided a design which is comparable to what was originally approved in terms of variety, detail and visual interest. With these changes, staff recommends approval as amended. z z` 6D. 0. .0 0' c0 • W =' J �•• w0 w =. d =W m. z 17. o z w 0 0 -; :0 w w. I--. o Z w 0 z Planning Commission /BAR Minutes January 25, 1996 Amy Kosterlitz, Buck & Gordon, 1011 Western Ave., Seattle 98104: Page 5 Ms. Kosterlitz stated she wanted to lend support to the staff recommendation to approve the revised project as consistent with the design review ordinance. The reason for the revision was Les Schwab's need to have painted block with colors closer to their traditional corporate image, rather than the natural split -face block originally approved. Les Schwab has made a significant compromise from its traditional colors by muting them. Ms. Kosterlitz then introduced Paul Casey, the project architect. Paul Casey, 10116 36 Ave. Ct. SW., #109, Tacoma, WA 98499: Mr. Casey presented a slide show which featured other Les Schwab stores throughout the area. The two proposed colors are an almond for the primary exterior wall surface and the lighter colonial red below and also used on the accent strip. The pilasters were added to the eastern side of the building to add interest to that area. Planting has been added to the street side of the building and to the parking lot. A block base has also been added to the sign. Mr. Meryhew asked if there was a significant cost increase to maintain an unpainted versus painted surface. Mr. Casey said there is a tendency for the unpainted block to stain. The best way to protect block is to paint it. Mr. Casey added that the proposed colors are in harmony with Home Depot's colors (he passed around a color wheel). Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. Mr. Meryhew said he likes the previously approved colors better than these presented this evening. However, Les Schwab has made a good effort to satisfy. Tukwila's requirements. Mr. Livermore said he also liked the previous submittal better, but this color scheme does fit within the BAR criteria. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L96 -0001: LES SCHWAB, WITH STAFF'S AMENDED RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Marvin adjourned the meeting. Prepared By, Sylvia Schnug 511,1150 fi li4:e. iicii�4ii i� ',;C z �w 6 00. N w: J= I-' CO u_ w0 2 = d: w Z �. I— 0. Z w Ca 0 ww H V. . : - 0. .. z` U N o� City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared January 18, 1996 HEARING DATE: January 25, 1996 PROJECT: LES SCHWAB TIRE STORE BAR #L96 -0001 (L95 -0051) APPLICANT: Paul Casey, Architect PROPOSAL: Modify approved design of a 13,222 s.f. tire store by painting over the split face block material. LOCATION: 6804 S 180 ST (SW Corner of Home Depot Site) ACREAGE: 1.15 Acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Tukwila Urban Center ZONING DISTRICT: TUC, Tukwila Urban Center SEPA DETERMINATION: A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) was issued for the proposal on November 27, 1995. STAFF: John Jimerson ATTACHMENTS: A. Development Plans (Sheets P2, Al & L1). B. BAR Application /Applicant Response to Criteria. C. Original Staff Report (12/14/95) D. Minutes from 12/14/95 mtg. E. Color Building Elevations. * F. Color Board.* G. Photo of Lacey Store* H. Prev. Approved Color & Material Board.* *To be presented at meeting. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • res tw i cQa6 • xw , z w 0 N J = w O. u- ¢: N D • w m. Z �t H O Z � o! O cn' wW V O, U. ( O Z BAR Staff Report L96 -0001 Page 2 z FINDINGS 1 Z. VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION D �U. 00 1. Project Description: Requested is modification of the m w approved 13,222 square foot retail tire store. Specifically, _ the applicant is proposing painting over the split face u)I; block, with a bottom band "Colonial Red" to match the roof w 0 and the mid - section to be painted "Almond ". The approved 2 design is for the color to be integral (rather than painted -� on) with the split face block with a muted red for the u) D. bottom band and gray in the mid section. Y w' 2. Existing Development: The site is one of two building pads z H.. along the S 180 Street frontage of Home Depot. The site is zI- improved with several parking spaces and a landscaped area 2 n planted with lawn, pine and spruce trees. The Home Depot v o parking lot is fully developed and provides access to the O P; site. o = W, 3. Surrounding Land Use: The vicinity is characterized by a wr- variety of by retail and industrial buildings. "—'Z` w 4. Terrain: The site is level. i y: O 5. Vegetation: Vegetation includes urban landscaping Z. consisting of lawn, spruce and pine trees. 6. Access: Access to the site is provided through the internal circulation system of the Home Depot site. Points of entry from S 180 ST are located near the west and east boundaries of the Home Depot site. BACKGROUND. On December 14, 1995, the BAR approved the design for the Les Schwab Store. At that meeting, several members of the BAR expressed their appreciation of the high quality design of the building and its appropriateness for being located at this primary entrance into the Tukwila CBD. Shortly after that meeting, the applicant requested administrative approval to paint over the block material with Colonial Red and Almond colored paints. Staff believes the proposed change is a substantial departure from the BAR approved plans, and thus cannot be approved administratively. We discussed the possibility of administrative BAR Staff Report L96 -0001 Page 3 approval of a compromise of painting the mid - section with the almond color and maintaining the bottom band with the approved red block. With that solution, the red block would provide a heavy textured brick appearance which would visually anchor the building, provide variety and visual interest, and therefore avoid monotony of design through variety of detail. The applicant did not accept that compromise as a possible solution so it was not further pursued. Subsequently, the applicant filed this request to the BAR. DECISION CRITERIA This project is subject to BAR review as required under TMC 18.60.030(2)(A)(ii) due to building exceeding 10,000 square feet in the CM zone and the site being within 200 feet of the Green River. Since the proposal is to paint the building and change the color, only the criteria related to building design are presented below. The applicant response to the criteria is contained in Attachment "B ". The staff report and minutes from the original review of December 14, 1995 are contained in Attachments "C" and "D ". (4) Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CHANGES As noted in Attachment "B ", the applicant is proposing an alternative design they feel is more in keeping with their z w 6 •�U O CO o W, W =' J 1 W� u-Q m� =d W. z� I- O' Z I- 111 jjj ' 10 52: •0 Ww V U- O. • Z W U =, O~ •z BAR Staff Report L96 -0001 Page 4 corporate image. They feel that the approved design is too great of a departure from their corporate standard red and white 1 z building. = F, 1- W APPROVED DESIGN w JU The approved principal material consists of split face block with O O` the muted red and gray colors integral with the block. The N w; colors and texture are similar to the block used at Target on LLJ _ Strander Boulevard. The applicant now proposes to paint over 0 u, this block. The red block would be painted "Colonial Red" and w O; the gray block would be painted "Almond ". 22_': g J At the original hearing, staff recommended approval of the u) D`. project because the applicant had made several positive z d improvements that outweighed the weaknesses of the building. ... _ zi.- Staff considered the overall strengths of the approved building z i design, including the variety of detail and form created by the : D unpainted split face block, minimized the appearance of the v o unsightly doors and compensated for the lack of modulation and o P;. resulting monotony of design. 0 = to The approved color scheme provides an interesting contrast uLl -' between the muted, warm, natural appearing colors of the split - Z: face block with bright red accent grids and the muted red metal w roof. - _. 0 z DESIGN ISSUES Given the function of the building, there is very limited modulation and the building footprint has a "box" configuration. Also, there is a series of overhead doors at each of the service bays. These doors provide a significant restriction on the options available for achieving a quality design. These doors /service bays are a type of "service area" that are addressed in the BAR guidelines. TMC 18.60.050(1)(B) states that service areas should be located, designed and screened. TMC 18.60.050(3)(F) states that screening of service yards and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. These difficulties in design were overcome by the use of the natural appearing block which provided texture, contrast, variety, and richness and warmth and color. The other details of the building, the red metal roof and the bright red grid features on the west elevation provided contrast and interest to the block. r4.�Fi'hV!_i{:jp+p'j�'i: .'F,wa'oao�1siJ.abz uaYaiA�1 fi BAR Staff Report L96 -0001 Page 5 The proposal to paint over the block will result in the principal building material having a higher reflectivity, less texture and less rich appearance than would the previously approved design. There will be less contrast and visual interest between the block and the roof and grid accent details (TMC 18.60.050(4)(a,d &g). , CONCLUSIONS Building Design 1. The previously approved building design provides a level of quality consistent with recent developments in the CBD. The provision of split face block with integral muted colors and bright accent details resulted in an acceptable quality of development despite the lack of building modulation and presence of several service bays and roll -up doors. 2. The proposal to paint the block to an off -white "Almond" color and a "Colonial Red" would eliminate the richness of color, texture and contrast provided by the previous approved materials. 3. The painting of the block will eliminate significant design features that had previously outweighed the weaknesses of the building design, namely the lack of modulation and the presence of several service bays and roll up doors. 4. There have been successful projects in the CBD in which the chain stores have departed from their typical store design. Burger King on Andover Park West makes extensive use of natural colored split face block as does Target on Strander Boulevard. Mervyn's also departed substantially from their standard building design in favor of brick material. RECOiMENDATIONS Based on the information we have at this time and review of the BAR criteria, the Planning Division recommends denial of the project. The applicant has requested to meet with staff prior to the hearing, for the purpose of exploring resolution of the issues described in this report. Additional information may be provided at the hearing, based on these discussions. 1 11 E n mOoP a.dr3w »f.r1F, A. 9 t tsr ncwrear)Nr pv ,f0W z F— • W: 6 - U' v O' co 0 W'=. J �- N LL; w0 LL Q w z� f- O z i- 2 D. UO U): W W` H U LL_~O Z LLi O ~` z s { v _ T H C A S �C is A. ltU V �'�`UULJU J • u01 JJId57'l_LA re )' nutaL' rt, i 1©iO3i9S 08:11 5�.._. 447 9133 CITY OF TUKWILA LS BMPLOYEE SRVS -- F BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION q4002,002 DEPARTMENT OF nevaLti ll.Jrry ncvc. 6300 Sotfhcer)ter BouleyardA Tukwi,,_kYt9, 9ti1. . FOR STAFFUSEONL.Y Plormnerr Pile Number: Lq . -orz) Cross•lteterence Files: ReePirir tJ„r+ 1-∎os• 1. BRIEFLYDESCitIB YOUR PROPOSAL: construction of art .appzox. . 13,400 3.f. Les Schwab tira store. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub - division; or tax lot number, access street, and clearest intersection) ioBto s. 18d sr. On South 180th Street,._-at _t.b, ti,c Humes t7vk.vi. (Z7micinfoern+ tine+ m.v4 - 1. • • { _ •• • •••••v.rtimml 3, AII'LdCAN :* Name: Paul. Casev hP. Mino`_' Croup. 2:reekS,:.r �o 2 n111"a-P;). QbA L CJJ. .• •. 0. f 2-0 E r.r„a•: Signature: MOP Date: • 1.12124/16 -The appli ant is the person w • - • ff will contact regarding the application, and to whore all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipule ted by applicant, iax 581 -9720 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP . • 4. PROPERTY. Name: OWNER Address: e ,..��c1� �icJ, /tp� s J(e Br-, 7%7c. . Phone: I /WE,(signature(s)j �j �;',., l�. n swear that I /we are the owner or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved - in this application and that th foregoing statements altd answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: ATTACHMENT B DEG Z i 1995 z �Z • ft UO N cnill U1 J }� � LL: w0 J. u. fa a =w t- z� uj o c'`,. CI H' 0. w w'. z; Ili z O E lrl Gli 1�� �'�llyKtY,�Y 1 ; 1rS1Gt*I P VIEW APPLUC. ON CASEY c P . 0 Page 2 . 'CRITERIA The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond. to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE.TO'SITE A. The site should be planned to .accomplish a desirable transition with the. streetscape•and to provide for adequate•landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened: to moderate the visual impact of are paved areas: • . .. C. ''The heighti and scale of each building should be.considered in relation to it site RESPONSE: The building location'pro'vides ample buffer along 180th to provide a suitable'transition space. Parking is provided in front (east side) of building with landscape areas of•simi•lar size as the Home Depot ,parking *landscape areas. Building is single story and is of suitable scale". . 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE.AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masseAs encouraged. $. 'Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should'be' consistent with the established neighborhood character. • D. Compatibility of vehicularpariPcfr,zri circulation p wading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street.circuration should be encouraged.. • • . RESPO.NSt: (Qhmu,R.Efl) .'Building exterior is coloredvsplit face block with horizontal pattern _ • _ . - • Building development also is compatible to eXisting pedestrian & vehicular'traffic,patterns.. • Ut_'.; aJ t. I IJ z Z. ~w rt g 00 to o. _1, N u, w 0. g �. J• u. N 2. =a �.w Z Za • ww wt-;. - O w U I.. O�- z _ _ 1 1 -,.C- ,•: . :a....4--'.arit,l-llY�ccA. o'r, `� IFt1IIE fiESIGN REVIEW APPLIG. )N •• Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE' AND SITE.TREATMENT ' A. Where existing topographic pat -terns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Qrades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. a C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, slrengthenvistas and important , I- w axis, and provide shade. ! • •: • . ti ce 2 B. • D. In Locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, o p mitigating steps should be taken. °' co w . .B. Wherebuilding sites lizrtit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- -I p aged. • w o:. w F. Screening of service yards, and other places which terd.tcrbe unsigl t , I should be'accom- 2 plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be a. Q` 'effective in winter and summer.. " 'I n CI O. Tn areas where general planting.will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and Z i pavings of, wood; brick, stone, orgravel may hei L�1i O H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- w w scape: Lighting' standards and' fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the D o, building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained•in design. Excessive jog D- ..brightness and. brilliant colors should be avoided. w ua' RESPONSE: u. •..i r1 V .� 1 4. 1\ t, •--1 �� • — V '1• Existing frontage landscaping. will be, improved to bring that area Cu U N to current Standards .. Landscaping now located on west side of building o �' will be upgraded to accent the buildings architectural elements. z.. Additional parking lot landscaping is being added at .east side of building. Additional pole lights. are being added at east side of building•.(will match existing Home Depot lighting). • 4. BUILDING DESIGN • A. Architectural style is not.restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its o,_ design and relationship' to surroundings. 'l� ' `' " IJ9b B. Buildingsshouldbe to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de;• t `!' velopments. DE. `E :'PMEN z c raMp:�eq + ^St uy�>?Rt:- ta}X+ar::.l^^'i�.yp±'z 4earroi,r,ti y!k!N,rT:MtYMP:'! °,N'J,76 ';¢.?'••tt+Q'.SRti xs.1 n7j ' �y�" 3w; h�YygSk eNM�7tS�R' ��S; �H?? �rrneR+. �x! r<. �+, �rL�s cersrrsew. en��RS: nAegi� +.rrvt�r�,.,%�.s�.e.teot*,7^:. aan�.F.X4 2 -g5 T 1 5.:'_�.^r 17+.v.: RVIEW APPLIC/ ON. C.ASLY GRO P _ to Page 4 .• C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be Consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should .be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. F.. Mprhanica.i oqutprrrcnt or- o•t1LeL •uditty'harctware•orl.roof, ground' or buildings should b,e screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in si ,ktgle urmultipie buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form,_and siting should be used'to provide 'visual interest.. •SPONSE:: p�1 N D� • Colored split face block is being used ('see color ,boarrd acid • elevations )__ alpng with, red - - : t 'ellis'F e1.eme•rtts ---- . _ -_ _ • .5 s • { • • MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET.FURNITURE A: Miscellaneous structures and streetfurnitvse should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials shouldbe compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures .and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, la,ndscape,arid"buildifigs. • i RESPONSE: • • Exterior dumpster 'will 'be screened by split .face block enclosure • with solid (painted stl.) gate. •5 E) • w r4 2 00 o wx J V. W° J U- < W. Z j- I- OLL. Z 0 O N' W W. LL Z U 01- Z __ City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared December 7, 1995 HEARING DATE: December 14,1995 PROJECT: LES SCHWAB TIRE STORE BAR #L95 -0051 APPLICANT: Paul Casey, Architect PROPOSAL: Construction of a 13,222 s.f. tire store with 40 parking spaces. LOCATION: 6810 S 180 St (SW Corner of Home Depot Site) ACREAGE: 1.15 Acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DISTRICT: CM, Industrial Park (TUC, Tukwila Urban Center) SEPA DETERMINATION: A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) was issued for the proposal on November 27, 1995. STAFF: John Jimerson ATTACHMENT C 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 ,,:.... .....a'kLUMYwii.ViY:ii�.itii•�l. �:,l�YNte}uWS4r':j�- .`aS'_ l +rx:.i'�jj!y�,� .' %`F::_'¢Vl+saail, .i55N:_.. !t'i+'...:( ^v. Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L95 -0051: Les Schwab Page 2 ATTACHMENTS: A. Development Plans (Sheets P1, A7, 1,1 & C1). B. BAR Application /Applicant Response to Criteria. C. Colored Building Elevations. * D. Color and Material Board.* *To be presented at meeting. Staff Report to the L95 -0051: Les Schwab Board of Architectural Review Page 3 FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION z 1.- z. re 1. Project Description: Requested is approval of a 13,222 square foot retail tire 6 v store with 40 parking spaces. , v o • 0 W, w i. 2. Existing Development: The site is one of two building pads along the S 180 Street -' i frontage of Home Depot. The site is improved with several parking spaces and w o; a landscaped area planted with lawn, pine and spruce trees. The Home Depot 2 parking lot is fully developed and provides access to the site. g a' co D d 3. Surrounding Land Use: The vicinity is characterized by a variety of retail and I _; z1..; I- o' 4. Terrain: The site is level. ? o' UN 5. Vegetation: Vegetation includes urban landscaping consisting of lawn, spruce io —. A:31-•• IV w H V. ', IL O . 6. Access: Access to the site is provided through the internal circulation system of z: the Home Depot site. Points of entry from S 180 ST are located near the west and v east boundaries of the Home Depot site. .o I-: industrial buildings. and pine trees. BACKGROUND A short plat of the Home Depot site which creates two new lots along 180th Street have been approved, including this Les Schwab site and a second pad located at the southeast corner of the site. A shoreline permit was required because the site is within 200 feet of the Green River (south of 180th Street). The shoreline permit cannot be issued until completion of the SEPA process. December 13th is the earliest the shoreline permit may be issued. In order to vest their rights under the old zoning ordinance, the applicant submitted a building permit application prior to adoption of the new zoning ordinance. Therefore, the project is subject to the requirements of the previous code. Required parking under the old code in which this is vested is 2.5 spaces per thousand square feet of floor area. The new code has increased the parking requirement to 4 spaces per thousand. z Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review Page 4 L95 -0051: Les Schwab DECISION CRITERIA This project is subject to BAR review as required under TMC 18.60.030(2)(A)(ii) due to building exceeding 10,000 square feet in the CM zone and the site being within 200 feet of the Green River. Board Review Criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff discussion. The applicant response to the criteria is contained in Attachment "B ". 18.60.050: General Review Criteria. (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements.. .b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. 'The front yard landscaping exceeds the minimum 15 foot requirement. The building is 50 to 60 feet from South 180th Street, with most of the area between the sidewalk and building landscaped. There are no pedestrian links proposed between the building and the sidewalk along the frontage. The parking layout will not substantially change with this proposal. The placement of the building at the southwest corner of the site will screen some of the existing parking. Where there are parking lot modifications, new landscape islands are provided in a manner consistent with the existing parking lot. The loading and service area is located behind the north wall of the building, screened from view from S. 180th Street. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. • a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. 'Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular /pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. The character of the vicinity is dominated by concrete tilt -up buildings of various heights and design. Recent remodels of several of the tilt -up warehouses for conversion to retail has resulted in a general upgrade in appearance. '.VatiZr :ntia:+t::31.Y.4knZkYtltii Asai;6,;:, r: airrau .a�u��.s..sc.z� >t,�,.�<.�.�.: Staff Report to the L95 -0051: Les Schwab Board of Architectural Review Page 5 The site is separated from the adjacent property to the west by 20 to 40 feet of landscaping, sidewalk and a 30 foot drive. An additional 20 feet of landscaping will be provided between the drive and the new building. The property lines that separate the site from the adjacent property to the east and north are located in the drive lanes of the larger parking lot. Landscaping in the transition consists of landscape islands consistent with the larger parking lot in which it is located. The project will be served by two existing driveways from S. 180th Street. The main entrance into Home Depot is signalized. An unsignalized entrance is located to the west of the building. The project will not modify these entrances nor will it interfere with turning movements. (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance.. . . . . .. . . . • . . c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The landscape plan contains large areas of landscaping in the front and along the west side of the building. Along the S 180 ST frontage, existing ground cover and shrubs which defines the frontage for the entire Home Depot site is proposed to be retained. An additional Kwansan• Cherry Tree, the same as five existing trees, is proposed to be added. A 30" high lawn berm would be located between the frontage and the building. The landscaping proposed along the west side of the building is similar to the street frontage, including a combination of ground cover, a variety of low growing shrubs and a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees. « n,+ rne+.e+•...nw +a..w�w.rrs.!wernrt z • Z' ry JU' U 0' U U:. W CD w: w0 �a E2. a X _'. Z 1- 0 Z I- Lu U� w 2U. I— — . O: w z` 01- z Staff Report to the L95 -0051: Les Schwab Board of Architectural Review Page 6 City Council Resolution No. 1276 states that new developments will plant trees according to the CBD Street Plan. The Plan identifies Flame Ash as the tree to be z planted along South 180th Street. 11-:' re The landscaping on the east and north side of the building is limited to parking lot 6 D: islands and small planters at the entrance into the showroom. The east property line is a v 0 "side" and under the code in which it is vested, five feet of landscaping is required. co w When a short plat was approved in 1994 which created this site, the provision of LU i' required landscaping was deferred until the time of development. CO w w 0; Effective Monday December 12th, the zoning of the property has changed from CM to Tukwila Urban Center. Under this zone, no side yard landscaping is required. es 3 However, since the site is vested under the CM zoning, the five foot standard applies. F w .Side yards are often used for shared access between adjacent properties, and as such, ;z �: the City has interpreted the code so as to apply this requirement in a flexible manner so z O that the landscaping is provided, though not necessarily at the property line. III w: n o The proposed plan shows landscaping between the east property line and the building o located in two parking lot peninsulas, three tree islands, at the entrance of the building w uj and south of the handicap parking spaces. With an excess of seven parking stalls, there �; . is opportunity to provide additional landscaping to meet the intent of the zoning code .w z landscape requirement. v The landscape plan states that an automatic irrigation system with in- ground moisture z sensors will be provided. Section 18.56.040(6)(E) requires wheel stops on perimeter parking so cars will not protrude off the parking lot. In areas where full sized parking spaces abut required landscaping, this provision for wheel stops will reduce damage of vehicles to the landscape materials. The loading area /dumpster is located at the rear of the building so as not to be visible from South 180th Street. The rear of the building however, is visible from the Home Depot parking lot and the access drive to the west. The dumpster will be located behind a wall constructed of masonry to match the building. (4) Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. Staff Report to the L95 -0051: Les Schwab Board of Architectural Review Page 7 c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. Z d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. Z H' e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened W • ct from view. D ` f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed -i U. accessories should be harmonious with building design. N 0' ■ Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety o detail W w g. Monotony b'r g p gP 1 Variety � w= form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. N LL w0 The applicant has worked with staff which has resulted in substantial improvements to 2 the design of the building. The original submittal included use of smooth concrete g masonry unit (CMU) block with bright white and red as the predominant color scheme. CO a` Changes include going to a split face block with muted colors (red and gray) _ interspersed with bright red accent tiles, adding a series of steel grid features along the z 1' west side and adding a gabled entry feature on the east side of the building. The z O-. standing seam metal roof and fascia has been changed from white to a muted colonial ? n; red. o (P; ;o F—' (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture VW: _ . There are no miscellaneous structures or street furniture proposed. The proposed - z signage includes one freestanding sign and one building sign. The sign ordinance ,v allows allows a maximum of two signs. . � ...co: z CONCLUSIONS 1. Since the original submittal, the applicant has worked with DCD in making several modifications which has resulted in a substantially improved design. Relationship of site to structure. 2. The placement of the building at the southwest corner of the lot will serve to reduce the impacts of the large Home Depot parking by partially screening it from view from certain perspectives. 3. The development will not be detrimental to the existing driveways into the site from South 180th Street. Loading areas are separated from the primary vehicular drive aisles and parking area. Provision of a pedestrian path from the building to the sidewalk along South 180th Street will provide for safe pedestrian circulation. "zti.JL ':Z:• :JAtr' 1+"': Kc<ii %i ti4 .2tldLi%Jf'-0:zW''L'%J:6Jit5M . rAaw'L Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review Page 8 4. Pedestrian access will be improved if a sidewalk is provided between the building entrance and the front sidewalk. L95 -0051: Les Schwab Landscaping and Site Treatment 5. Replacement of the existing street trees with Flame Ash will appropriately implement the CBD Street Tree Plan pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 1276. 6. Additional landscaping could be provided which furthers the intent of the sideyard landscaping requirement by providing a comparable area of landscaping between the building and the eastern property line and without detrimental effects on the integration between the adjacent parking lots. Building Design 7. The building design provides a level of quality consistent with recent developments in the vicinity. 8. The proposed white color roof is inconsistent with BAR criteria 4(d) that discourages use of bright or brilliant colors except as accent. A muted tone would also not appear to age as fast as a white roof. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture 9. The two proposed signs are compatible with the proposed building design. The wall sign is in scale with the entry fascia on which it is located. 10. The trash enclosure is integrated with the building through use of the same materials. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed project with the following conditions: 1. The landscape plan shall be modified to include Flame Ash, spaced 30 feet on center, along the S 180 street frontage. 2. Additional landscaping shall be provided in the parking in the following locations: Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L95 -0051: Les Schwab Page 9 A. A seven foot wide peninsula shall be provided at the center of the bank of parking spaces east of the building. The length of the peninsula shall match the length of the two parking spaces. A seven foot wide landscape peninsula shall be provided along the east property line in lieu of the southeastern most parking space. This peninsula shall be the length of the parking space. 3. A four foot wide sidewalk shall be provided from the building entrance to the sidewalk along the street frontage. z �Z w U0' 0;: WW' W z' J Hi Co Ao mow; a z W' D Di i0 0.1_`, = U. Li• Zi ;U Nz. • O ~', PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 1995 f- W Mr. Neiss called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members present were 6 ci Commissioners Neiss, Stetson, Meryhew, Marvin, Livermore, and Malina. v o Representing the staff were Jack Pace, John Jimerson, and Sylvia Schnug. w CO Mr. Neiss read into the record, and presented to Jack Flesher, a resolution w O; acknowledging his time and contributions on the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review. Mr. Flesher's term on the Planning Commission expired in u Q. December. CO a: iw Mr. Flesher thanked the Commission. He noted the Commission has many ? opportunities ahead of them with the new Council and DCD Director. Z o There were no citizens comments. o Ni :o H MR. LIVERMORE MO VED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 3, 1995 MINUTES. MR. = v MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY LL o APPROVED. • z 0.)' F- �s MS. STETSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 26, 1995 MINUTES. MR. •O MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 9,1995 MINUTES. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. L95 -0051: Les Schwab Tire: Mr. Jimerson presented the staff report. The proposal is to build a 13, 300 sq. ft. retail tire store with 40 parking spaces for that use. It is located on the Home Depot site. A Determination of Non - Significance was issued earlier. The project is subject to a Shoreline Permit because it is located within 200 feet of the Green River. That permit was issued. The applicant has vested legally with a complete building permit under the previous zoning, which is the CM a;:,e. The applicant has made significant design improvements since it originally came in. The primary materials include a split -faced block, standing seam metal facia and metal roof. Five feet of sideyard landscaping is required. Staff has proposed that additional landscaping be provided with two landscape islands. The architect has proposed two ATTACHMENT .D i F e • • L'110-60t)0 35mm Drawing# • I A F F I D A V I T Notice of Public Hearing LI Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet LI Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: LI Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit fl Determination of Non - significance LI Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action LI Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project L, S SNA -MA' o File Number V G— Signature il(74q(e City of Tukwila Department of Community Development PUBLIC NOTICE City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on January 25, 1996, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING I. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: II. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0066: Good Guys Dana Warren Approval to increase wall sign area from 150 s.f. to 180 s.f. per TMC 19.32.140(A). 300 Andover Park West, Tukwila. L95 -0067: Pavilion Mall /South Lot Development Cooperative Parking Agreement Trammell Crow Co. Approval of a cooperative parking agreement which would reduce the minimum required parking from 491 spaces to 475 spaces (3.3 %). 5901 S. 180th Street, Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS III. CASE NUMBER: L95 -0058: Pavilion Mall /South Lot Development Cooperative Parking Agreement Trammel Crow Co. Design approval of a revised parking lot plan to allow construction of two restaurants and relocate a portion of a stream. LOCATION: 5901 S. 180th Street, Tukwila. APPLICANT: REQUEST: OLD BUSINESS IV. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0051: Les Schwab Tire Paul Casey Approval of a revised design for a 13,222 square foot retail tire store with 40 parking spaces. 6810 S. 180th Street, Tukwila. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax. (206) 431-3665 z F--Z' mow. 6 D. U O, o; to wO w< (o a w LJJ 0; U N: .O o ,- w w: H- z: =`. O~ z Owners and Residents within 300 feet of Tukwila Les Schwab Project: OWNERS 1. Leuthold, Donald W 7275 W Mercer Way Mercer Island, Wa 98040 2. Siers, James M 1961 Sunset SW Seattle, WA 98116 3. Petschl Tukwila Ptrshp 1150 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 4. Mikami Masao C/O Wendco NW LTD Tx Dept P.O. Box 256 Dublin, Oh 43017 Boeing, Williams E Jr 1325 4th Ave Suite 1940 Seattle, WA 98101 Sade, Paul & Eleanor 585 Point San Pedro Rd San Rafael, CA 94901 7. Same as #5 8. Tri -Land Corporation 1325 4th Ave., Suite 1940 Seattle, WA 98101 Sea -Port Investments Inc. 5319 SW Westgate Dr Portland, Or 97221 10. Same as #5 . i •.:N »:.`F:— ,r"•�'G::.w.,�.l.f: :kRr•'.iiwi]ai`o:� "44.F.::at RESIDENT AETS 1120 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Empty Bldg. 1130 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Same None Williams Industrial Supply 1206 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 None Resident 1228 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Tierny Metals 1224 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Cort Furniture Rental 1230 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 z r,w 6 JU: 0 Co cn w;. w J I-, U) IL; w 0. 2 J. u. Q co = ar w; z�, z 1-, UJ U� �, = V U. O;. WI iuz 0� z RECEIVED Notes /1995/1391ist CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 041996 P.E.:i MIT.OENTI;R ur,..,.Owr•y 11. Seattle 1st National Bank 1001 4th Ave. Bond Trustee SVCS Seattle, WA 98154 12. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter BV Tukwila, WA 98188 13. First Inter Bnk - TOC 14. Corp Prop /M Spani P.O. Box 160 MS 526 Seattle, WA 98911 15. Campbell James Estate 1001 Kamokila Blvd Kapolei, Hi 96707 16. Same as #15 17. Black Development Corp. P.O. Box 3170 Honolulu, Hi 96822 18. Same as #13 & 14 19. Same as #13 &14 20. Sciola, Nick & Patricia Ann 6718 134th Ct NE Redmond, WA 98052 21. Omitted 22. Same as #6 23. Printing Control Services 1011 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 None None Same Norco 18201 Olympic S Seattle, WA 98188 Ryan Herco Fluid Flow Solution 18200 Olympic S Seattle, WA 98188 None Same Same None Costco 1160 Saxon Dr Tukwila, WA 98188 None z �QQ z; •.W� 00 w = •-1 W O; :2 I a. co D. • • I- 0: z 01 w w = Uj Or • • • • ui z.. N' U �„ � .." . ,.,..,,.. -. ..,• ^-•. >'__,�,,�.. _ • ��- �tdiYr2�. Wr�c:; �f9�kli'. i:. tia,.:. i; Aiaia :i;:Sus�':ffti�.ciil.,a, ?:S,i 24. North Valley Partnership C/O Reis Group 13221 SE 26th St #M Bellevue, wa 98005 PI 0 CL Q. tij 'A I 30 C... • ..•-• 21,11 w") •t,) 29—) • . , ec,0 .0;0' C. • P•6 ..5W • • et' ° 36 isc.. 12 CO na-nct ..634. )12-2e z5.3 770 27a-sce. /45.1 •,^ iffe. &-e4 3°41. op,G. Wit7,31 /6-2-t.4.4 7ia 0 to; (2jy)a69,,4,4_ ti 712(3 •D.7 1+ %.1.- r/&•-n44 /7( 0661, 111-2T,) al 001114/_e_e4,u_: 7071, • 7 4 4 54' 0 eco24-c(o :•••••1,4 ece.47 /fit e 0 lb' ,M.,..7;TiHtiT,./!!.i.l..!;tf,.,;:T:::,Tr::::..,i.f..a.k-..:.::-...:3-.-..,:.., , 4 7 Ji08.)-•4-04.r •1=3- -.1c1177,77--- 1333.07 508-.1 .53C et.O ‘.. Asa. .04.0,4 • •' 2 F, . ,.../...14,,...7f••• .or Jaacs••• -sic :... traw,acql:?... i . b 6 0 I --/))4-?1. , .1 14..:"N,I, 1 '' l j t/p44X13G4t:" 1 '1 fa C • o :Fr J•0111 :/ • A .,; •qi A..I ar.oa • '21 ‘.t .1 • . • . • • ' . • .•••• 41; \ •tA41) 1. I \ • \ 0 Z 40■.1•0.1...5.1 AC • . . Plruzkwnlaa Ott ©rr Tukwila, Washington VIICIRII 1Y FRAM •w 1111111 J47PA'It7f6'II II� 3 M.1 L•OICY96 0R I•N,011 mLwre PM, IN POLE rowT01INN. 1 C:2 ■611.11116! isdi .4„,vvok,r311111P13 Cloa LGi. ' L2 PIMIDENAIIVY IQfl1r g 1 1 1 . 4 1 1 Isom ISM CT* T K.rLi. 1..7I./. = MI Mari. RAI UltlifY 012.2•110011 LIe..WAR M1M1A111L11W 7221l1A411114AIRIY SIGN MUM, ►r.11a. VV.ra lcf OO�d ►W C y ((air ©* ArChiteet Architecture And Planning CO•ACip 611■CM.1•. 640011.1 A L►MI rpC]II, X11 �.A° PM61W 116101m. IICl1LW MIA WIMP 111C1CLNa MlA RIT01110 . PM *MOW 61711. 1114.2 617,1. 01 WWII 118 11.11014C7II7 ►ID 4411. MEM ▪ rMlDW OM MR. 61,10 WU* 2s11I 612 M. 1 1 ' I41U1141kI nFrin k I llila l)a.4:`:1/1:111:1111 ),11)1/11:1' R.1, ►,...'T 1�f 1.1�� ICO1111 CII•7M NY LOAM a. LDO11Tr 6i Y4 1w► • wlro. y. IPr p .3.• IV. 1•.40 1p4 MP w►m eyVA • = Z: re ~ W W � 00 N O ;v) W :W I. ;W O •1W I-O. IDW 1-: ?U a ' 10 — W' O. • .. Z W Z ) LATER slur= s'$TFM OAR VV APR RATED rvilL000 PARKED STEEL (SKID (KELLY MOOIE Al) SEE DETAL S4A1 T. ■ TA' LLIAINATED SRN VERITY LOCATION .)b MONO! SOLD SAOCN6 AT MOINTSI6 ORACKETS IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII�I "' "'I�Iliilllllll IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII II II 1111111 1111111111111111111101111111iiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIii1111I III 11111110011 111 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII liI .... II III I Illllllllll ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0101IIIIII.... Illlllllui�lll� ,,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,, II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1II111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII j._.). , 4 - .11 -.i = - - - --- I�i ioei r —:- r•ii� = -iii -- iii - -ii)r -ii — ii - - -- -- -- - .iii•- iii —iii :iii eiii•- •iiir•i 11 - • ' =:i i11gE�M _ Nlq 0 _ iii I .�M�11� _:IIIR rri .i :l i.WM =:i ai�1i■ri awwii i s ii s i, MI i IJEJLATED STEEL PANELS CP/AKER 17•3147 EAST ELEVATION SCALE, Vs• • 1'•01 11'11111111'11'1'1'1 '' '' '' '' lllllll 11111 METAL NOCE SYSTEM I CORP COLONIAL RED) ),a• DwPrPOIT TTTP) (MO COLONIAL RED) TER ENCLOSURE OPD IS' a E' OMR-WO DOORS 11111-1 EOTTOM CS) PASELS STEEL. NMLATED. fl LLY MOORE CRIMSON (SLOW ALL OTHER PANELS =V ELE (SLATED FILL. LITE4 SOIII ELEVATION SCALE, VS• • I'•o• NOIRTIHI ELEVATION SCALE. VIP • I• -O• D ISIPSTER ENCLOSURE B EYOND 4614 SPLIT FACED all NTH 64161.E SCORE TYPICAL AT GRID LOCATIONS COLOR (�) (PARKER ALMOND MJFW WEST ' IEII.IE V ATlIO V �T SCALE. VS' • 1'•0' PANTED STEEL arm (KELLY•MOORE Al) ( TYPICAL/ METAL ROOF PER (E))P COLONIAL RED) METAL PASCIA PER (011P COLONIAL RED) IS SLIT FACED CPL .PARKER ALMCNO 11.1144) RJR SPLIT FACED QL (PARKER 14•)1491 (Duey GErounip AndinIl teas Architecture and Planning 4144444 I Z Z. 5 )O U =' J I. nLL u 0: 1.▪ 0. _ w. z� zo- O D' O ww Z' w U= o I- NORTH Scale: 1"...20L0' Oc7TN .UC/H4L •. 20.H14Y1 4t/ PLANT MATERIAL LIST Col. Dot.%41 N04. Coon Nor Minn ■n Spacil/Rma•11s a!Q 00EI+ro'%Mee MI %MET 240010 r 64. 0470774 0.t07 W24)Yw» MVP 0000110 00)7 O 000447 04411.1) 10424114. MOW) 00420.V000 ✓4411.✓. L E% LRCNAT• town. 11.02 COOWTA 20T✓O• 4M04..ara.K 0207 2047)00 I70.04 CALLGIC.4.4 014474.0 /TWA 44ROCRW1to *2110 ✓x7=1 0200 24000 4k0 MINA 1001AT.0)12404 R•W0D10R040011a0C) V11.474 108‘91 Ot4• MOM 001/14$ tr t0T. wtOrOt..5 •mt7s Mr. r 44. CONO, •✓14041 Teu7 24 YR. 0420 WLX 704.7 247* tr MT. . Tat I. 024. O. TOT. rx 724. rYt 2'72 2000 r OL 100)2005 YAWS � DL 704010200419 007116 100 *222. x002. .ra D' 00 tR4 C CO 1r4 747 OL NOT 'PC.= 4' NW [RAPT w'ac N• 01 0271)4 UKY144. %TARS, .411 t• roc I - 7121 402 0111100 t9 00407.102* KC TREE PLANTNS DETAL tadva 2 r(c _1.�u rne1 `+ne.e•ene '*L. O PLANTNG DETAL N7 Ty1 24.0 COM= DOOT Nit 1447M D T fOt7The 002 4 07770 : A ^'i :. :�..r �,,; •, •a 7.27 .�^�✓'�,. 4 2220, :::.,•,... „,;::. hno,$ o.OD0000000000v0000000'000000'o . QM� 'aaY7t:eiooebboo'000r2'0'e'000 1 - n." ^^000WS�fOR¢QeD'iau°�"oDancl. 61 1. P1( 0410 oR712 01170170 D7 2470 Or 11.\4121 21 Tw.4 77)0 .OK LrKS� 70 LPT.0 t 1007 P0042 00) Tp[R r.a.la at 10414 Landscape ?Ian S. IIOTB STREET 007724 4 414707 0.025 1201104 777104 7.070 44.141074* E LC.% To Dt 20MP DT W 1.01,7n• 7.00400.4700,41c wMa7W 575102411/ • 4=41■71 x.0 0014074 2007 • S.401 NOT 207447026 77 21■■ • • 7704. 1*1a. =M•.Ri `0= 700200720.7 Atlas • to 400.27 S•hOe OWIIX w 2O0R0.L111 LEGEND 1.1% 07144. SCl9 [RAS" ■••4 I x 1 20444. Tttt I4A. [ROttY47.0 CO.TNOA AT O. 04204702 00000720.10.!504.77.1) 4•7Rt YOC7 1017000 TNW Y 007•T T•4 TO DE C147r9 NOTES • 102.11 ✓72.105 MP 0007? WAX AS .m0 TO AV= 1047 4T • KIN Tat. 1.114TUAFT ,ettA, 011% • CIJ N 2J.4Lro4 111.14•1,0%.1,1t R40c •Y•0•8TO4t • Se (Min 724.7 roe a„ Yrt 0.x•4777/427 0.176 108711 0C404cl.2744tH. 0101 urret N11.Wldii unhurt MAO Xt. • • 0an00, 70 4TO �Q,r}.407 0 100 10 *OM •h•1. Mo • 0 0 It 7017 ae ei4 Tvsa. rat Ttn 5074 w Tv%L • new 20•7260:0.75 04.t*2 Want 072 MAN 4. • 0 • 4107 4 07 4 6 WO%00^ O2Ke[0 D7101 )04 70 Or4S5 • 00)7 tea 4 00 104 ROM7 Ii�•1V' Q f N4� 4714C. .244714.2 1001 • th1ki n-W411.6 N KL00 *1110LM1Ta 20102.7 • 004726 e.1N trOtw104 720 tr.' NO .O! COOT M1M41NA RAN • .CI447L04 I.M6 .0.12YD0LT TO f I 207.720 a•r401 WO 7. 1101WKTS A✓o0.ta Pt Pr., w 1r.w• .•ra..sn Nr, 000000.77 A +�. ■.T I..r 001. • e..“ 1 • .0. owl 1040,• 1• 41144,1 e z1 Casey Group Architects Architecture And Planning U Z • Q HZ 1.11 • QQ J 0 0; U) W . W = 'J I u. AL '121: ' _W. iz F.. QLL: :La .z r Qi U 1O N., o 1H W W: (): , WZ U NTT' F5.�r,,.�,'•' ".,:1141,,.. C9151 TYPE II se • 441 MR • 2197 17(,15)=15.83 (5751 TIP( 11 59 r RIO 2145 12015.0•15.24 —0 LAW' OF Shvcar mitten 25417 isswr. 007150 519845751(44 1.041 P09475 TO REILADI AT 1.7157541 CATOI RASPS /-7P2.141" 1 GRAPHIC SCALE zo 44115 44 0 (imn) 11.1.0 M. DIAN tiT DATE SCALE: 1104111. VERT . 1!.=I Carolling Englnecr3 JOB NO. : CND. APPR. REV IS IC*4 001 MO Move. Sate 900 Seattle. Waslangtcn 9801 (2061 822-5822 Fax 7106.1 622-800 TUKWILA LES SCHWAB UTILITY SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW SHEET C-1 A F F I D A V I T .Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting JBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet. O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit ODetermination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Action LI Official Notice Other LI Other was t�o each of the following 1h4A-ti ThrPs addresses on 1(/( J 960 IVidolittA-I'D //1 Name of ProjectLS P File Number b9s---u).--( Signature w J U; U O' (.00s cn w W X J �. w0. g �. u_< cop mw; F— O Z w w: moo; O —' ww • Z U.N. z .... V's PUBLIC NOTICE City of Tukwila Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on January 25, 1996, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: II. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0066: Good Guys Dana Warren Approval to increase wall sign area from 150 s.f. to 180 s.f. per TMC 19.32.140(A). 300 Andover Park West, Tukwila. L95 -0067: Pavilion Mall /South Lot Development Cooperative Parking Agreement Trammell Crow Co. Approval of a cooperative parking agreement which would reduce the minimum required parking from 491 spaces to 475 spaces (3.3 %). 5901 S. 180th Street, Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: OLD BUSINESS IV. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0058: Pavilion Mall /South Lot Development Cooperative Parking Agreement Trammel Crow Co. Design approval of a revised parking lot plan to allow construction of two restaurants and relocate a portion of a stream. 5901 S. 180th Street, Tukwila. L95 -0051: Les Schwab Tire Paul Casey Approval of a revised design for a 13,222 square foot retail tire store with 40 parking spaces. 6810 S. 180th Street, Tukwila. z re w 442' '.: o O'.. 1 W co I, J: CO U. w o 2 g J; • ¢ co z o zI: w W U �. ;o S2' = V �r-: ., o . iu U 0 H; Oi‘ jr o Chart 1 COLOR IDENTIFICATION WHEEL For numbers on circle refer to colors listed on page 6. COLORS arranged in their LUE positions. SCALE—A normal Yellow Orange reduced progressively in intensity. HUE and VALUE remain relatively constant. 17 Chart 2 COLOR HARMONY WHEEL g4s cie ct 0 YELLOW 4,-4? ° 44 A. rF %A. 0 0 o '4. 4,9 o o 0 4. Q. 4: 4 OT 4) el ,$. ...,.....,• v.. ..., ......, ,....,,..,..,... .:i. 0 \t. , .,........-e.„,..., A 44 0 .' ..,' ,k .i:i.'4.■:1 (0 0 s ...' •Sj .f. ,fir CI O % ' . u ir4- ;.4,. A N tir / (2 q , , . , . 0 IMAM Fig. C—NEUTRAL VALUE SCALE—Nine equidistant Gray steps between Black and White. Fig. D—VALUE SCALE IN COLOR—A Yellow Orange of approximately the 6th value adjusted to conform to the Neutral Scale. Fig. B—The spectrum range of colors in light visible to the human eye. 18 File: LqkOO i m Drawing# mr�gOitr AFNe' Srco'4't64.!,14 4:"tkR<.i:c %,.< File: L qk000) 5mm Drawing# w ;st:c¢ ".s:e�_- JV +`�:r�r�•na rw�:+.dt.....:�i::uJa: ata.s:..c'+ .._�. r: wi».:a'aa: =Z; LUI <C4 21 AM Di' J U! U O'. ',CO p NW : WO :Z zI- W p, `10 =i . Ift - W Z, to irr: t v;e,•,�h 3 m Drawing# TIT.pir■ tl .11•11•■■ LATIN 1111K2C0 MOM OVER UP A.% RAM PLYWOOD PAN= STEIL dap MN COLOR SO) Su MAIL 3/Al 2' X NI' ILLUMNATECI NON NERIPT LOCATION Amo riovvie SOLID /MCKIM AT MCINTIRE ORACEETO • ' r• • ; 4•=:1 ■n NZ: • ••• , MESA= 6TIML rameLs (SEE COLOR 110AM) •ns EAST muzvErnom SCALE. lir • P-0" F2 MEI ECM Baia - -• , • •• _ _ . • ass mesa Rani :77 mil mei amid iF , szol NEI 11111 E E lell EN NEL ,,,.-;,. ..::...:, .....:: ,.- ,..::,.-:, _ ,,,, ...:::!: ,30 7 r, ,,.,, tz.._i ,,:,,,,„-; : LI , ,: -:'—'1 ..f;!..,..-.. ,-...,1 ,;7:::1 ;F: ....•-,, .1....!'2 'f`,T.1, r 'CI: . ,7r,7:.3 ".• DUMMETER ENCLOSURE ONYOND PANTED OMIT PACE QV ME COLOR WAND) BOWIE RU3117E1[11011' SCALA I/S. • l'•Ir ramp our maw all (NIII COLOR BOARD) PAWED SPLIT FACED CM 01121 COLOR DOAIED) DUMMER! ENCLOSURE MOOR PLAN Ems eimm ;F. ism mul NEN oncillg 1:3:',1r744 KIM 1=1 33 ae:77,1 7:7-13, 1=9 in &I Pft1D 3:;377 gar --- I 771;; LI :1 1- Nontirs munihmom 41GALE• VIP • P-O• METAL POOP (NEE COLOR IBOAIRD) rye' OCIINSPOUT (1TP) PAINTED TO MATCH tuALL 1,121P6TER ENCLOSURE 191170.0 t2' X C. OVIVIHEAD DOORS WITH 00T(01.1 (2) PANELS ETIEL, INSULATED. MAW COLOR" TOP •AtI. WEIL EMULATED, (TC• CM4 COLOR)) ALL OTHER PANELS =ME OLAZIO, PULL LITRE. ell00114 PACE iJ COXED BLOCK •ACCENT ETIMPE. (EE =OR DOA) PAN= SPLIT FACE WU WALL BABE MU COLOR EIOARD) MAL ROOF 1.1ER (SEE COLOR 150AM2) METAL FASCIA PER (6EE COLOR 00AIED) AIMED OXIBK116 SLIT FACED CM (COLCIt BOARD) ANTED WAX* 6P1./T FACEP (e EE COLOR 15OA) PANTED slot* mom WITH SRL! SCONE TITICAL AT GRID LOCATIONS NM COLOR 110M12) wr IFIAVATION WALE. 1/11• • P-ir PANTED STEEL ACCENT ORIO (NIE COLOR 00AND) NVAC UNITS OEM MECHANICAL PLANS • ,L6uVED DATE12411NITIALadi 1 1 cd d 1 Cuey Giroullp Airaultect Arcattecture and Planning 11D: L%-owl 1111111111111111111111�.111 11111111111111111131.11.1, 111.111.1 1) 11.11,1t 1.,.1,1111111.11 !ripply% ! I I at: or • az Lir, - 917. tiZ • . IZ.01Z01 t i 91 5mm 'awing; t.• .777,777:7777:57. •eAa i ROOM TOOLOTt TO WV. 'rec. • PUMA PM i s At Vi71114 %WY %Kt MO KRIM I' • WOK PLJNITIAIOL NTO tIAIKUONI %OWL , nap. so. AK corscrto P1 6. trrs LOMPAGT•lrlyiNFLY TO Pleltlft ILIUM • • rem mut. *am NA ni!RAIII• TIM -TREE PLANTING DETAIL- TOP OP MA. MOVE MIN VA O IV- YAM !AMID Off LOA lOt iiIIIIIONIPOPO1 Mann WM, TOIYOW. • • . Kona rnt 1 I. oti'i At 416101. WAVY WEI NO 110111111. • 11011C d ' -•: • PLOPO111101. tee wow', • id. AK cancrep .i.rawasy Omarrriernai LEND C• , , MOO 'IX ' d , . -tt iafsveztAT 41, ra .1 Jar■W I POO Li•ti"A F'AC ALLOW6 DY a-1-y a. ninti.A'Cegiweevew . • InV2T, ri/AA6AN CAERRY .5TIMET T17E6. trLI. AD CarLth caet.e kat or; rrie s., 180TH., sTRBET, stAli AND eert.tice )O,TNS 9HttAY, ARE tea:, potiActsY , 8611Pe- :P, , 7.! ro kItTI A11100Ala OIL ire*" aid AftetWO ..esvormwmiA, Avian:lite or . 2110 .57 " •••: 'f;'',2■. **.` • • . • . - • n ; '1"' 14g f:Ig gig tlz olr 911 911 L11 911 1 11111 111111111 7 iiiliiiiliiiihiii .• • , .• . ,' lteCtUre,•