HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L96-0026 - SANFT ADOLPH - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTL96 -0026
SANFT, LOUIE
14440
INTERURBAN AV
S
SHORELINE
PERMISSION
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (206) 649 -7000
October 4, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle WA 98118
Dear Mr. Sanft:
Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L96 -0026
SANFT, LOUIE - Applicant
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 1996 =NW -10088
The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development permit, to remove vegetation and
trees within the shoreline zone, and replant, has been filed with this office by the City of
Tukwila on September 25, 1996.
The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day
appeal period, October 16, 1996. You will be notified in writing if this permit is appealed.
Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit.
If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final
notification of action on this permit.
Sincerely,
Alice Kelly, Shorelands Specialist
Shorelands and Water
Resources Program
AK:ak
SDP.DOC
cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila
ii: 3: i3Yi_ t;i:;S•':%.T: NSh:J'ra:._e.V 4: .:.:, :a:t7+.ir;:4;wtnrn,:v. L`Yn:w tiixi tih::W.+i15S%d'.11.AA, aax
F':uaSt. . .. ",_^ 'Sdi' :r-ta * s u Sv v.!;f• r skSvs;r.,.,. .. ....
z
•Q F- w
0
O O;
0`
In al!
J ='
CO U.!
W O:
g•-3
lL Q'..
• = d;
W•
I, •
z
- of
• .z
W W
2
U 0;
O N!
2U
.1-
z: •
•0
z..
RECEIVED
OCT 0 7 1996
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Shot I ne Management Act of 197: 1
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
File Number: L96 -0026
Status: APPROVED
Applied: 05/31/1996
Approved: 09/23/1996
Expiration: 09/23/1998
Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to: LOUIE SANFT
to undertake the following development:
SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW CLEARING OF VEGETATION
WITHIN THE SHORELINE ZONE
upon the following property:
Address: 14440 INTERURBAN AV S
Parcel No: 336590 -1605
Sec /Twn /Rnge: 23/23/04
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER
AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE
SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT.
The following master program provisions are applicable to this development:
City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the
attached terms and conditions.
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 an
nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any
other Federal, State . or local statutes, ordinances or regulations
applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline
Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW).
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the
permittee, fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof.
event the
CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED
UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL
REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF
SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c).
Date: sue. 15510
Steve Lancaster
Director, Planning Department
Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within
two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173-14-060.
z
�Z
rew
J0
O 0
y 0
w=
Jam.
CALL,
w O,.
• -
LL
• a
=w
H =.
Z �.
I— O
Z
U• 0
co
O
0 H
w w.
L H.
O
• z;
UC
z
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
September 24, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96 -0026 Shoreline Permit
L96 -0027 Tree Permit
Dear Mr. Sanft:
This is to inform you that the City of Tukwila has granted approval of the above referenced
permits.
The shoreline permit has been forwarded to the Department of Ecology for filing. Any appeals
of the shoreline permit must be made to the Shoreline Hearings Board within 21 days of the
date of filing.
The tree permit has been approved with one condition, which is enclosed. Please note the
deadlines by which the planting plan and actual planting must be completed. The determination
of replacement trees is based upon an estimate as to the number and size of trees removed
within the shoreline zone. Enclosed is our analysis on which the estimates were based.
Since the tree permit predates adoption of Ordinance No. 1768, appeals would be heard by the
Board of Adjustment. Any appeal must be filed within 10 days of the date of this letter.
Don't hesitate to call me at 431 -3663 if you have any questions on these actions.
Sincerely,
John Ji
Assoc!
erson
e Planner
enclosures: Tree Permit Conditions
Tree Replacement Analysis
Shoreline Permit
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
z
.F-z;
w:.
6
•:0 0';
Wo
W W.'.
J H
CO u_
w0
qa-
•w •a' •
I '
I- la
z �
E-o',
. z Hi
Do;
w
w •
1-
LLi z:
'A
.O
z.
CITY OF TUKWILA
Address: 14440 INTERURBAN AV S
Suite:
Tenant: SANFT ADOLPH
Type: P-TREE
Parcel #: 336590-1605
Permit No: L96-0027
Status: APPROVED
Applied: 05/31/1996
Issued: 09/23/1996
***************************************************************************
Permit Conditions:
1. Fifty four (54) replacement trees are required pursuant to
TMC 18.54.130. These trees shall be planted no later than
October 31, 1996. Prior to planting, the applicant shall
submit a planting plan to DCD which shows the location,
species and size of the trees. Deciduous trees shall have a
minimum caliper of 2.5 inches. Coniferous trees shall have
a minimum height of 6 - 8 feet.
•
1
•
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
City of l u pm�r jT ja andwn John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Jack Pace
John Jimerson
Shoreline and Tree mits - Louis Sanft
September 17, 1996
Project Files: L96 -0026 (Shoreline)
L96 -0027 (Tree)
z
~W •
ry -J U;
Uo
co U'
cn w
w=
J
CO
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a tree permit and w 0
shoreline permit for removal of trees and vegetation within the shoreline overlay zone. g
The work has already occurred without benefit of the proper permits. The permit
applications were submitted subsequent to enforcement actions taken by the City = a
Attorney's office. _;
z 1_;
�o
The property is located at 14440 Interurban Avenue South. The applicant removed w
D;
several trees from the shoreline zone - the species, size and exact number are unknown. �� o:
Using aerial photographs it appears there were roughly 18 trees removed from within the : N:
shoreline zone. Several other trees located in the northwest corner or the site but out of 0
the shoreline zone were also removed. _ w
u.
The applicant also removed what other vegetation may have been on the site (grasses z''
and shrubs). Upon inspection following a complaint, large areas of bare ground had been 2 co
exposed, thus triggering the requirement for a land altering permit. oo
z
Part I - TREE PERMIT
A. The clearing of any vegetation within the shoreline zone is subject to a tree permit
(18.54.050(1)). Criteria for approval are contained in 18.54.130. The criteria include
provisions for tree retention, tree protection, tree replacement, protection of surrounding
vegetation and habitat and tree relocation. Four of the criteria have been rendered moot
because the trees /vegetation have already been removed. Thus, the focus of this review
is on tree replacement.
Tree Replacement
The tree ordinance (18.54 TMC) requires that a certain number of replacement trees be
provided for every significant tree removed. The number of replacement trees required
ranges from one to eight for each tree removed depending on the size of the removed
trees. The larger the tree, the more replacement trees required.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
Having removed the vegetation prior to obtaining a permit has created difficulties in
applying this simple formula. The applicant has failed to adequately document 1) the
number of trees removed within the shoreline zone; 2) their size; and 3) their species.
The applicant has not provided reliable information as to how many trees were removed. z
He indicated there were no records, such as invoices or cost estimates between he and z ~.
the contractor, that indicates how many trees were removed. With his original cc Lum
application submitted on May 31, 1996, he identified 3 trees within the shoreline zone as 6 D
being removed. Subsequently, he submitted an aerial photograph with a list that o o;
indicates five trees (and a sixth that he claims to be a bush) has been removed, along i N W
with three holly bushes. This aerial photo shows the location of the 200 foot shoreline _I I
zoned further east than did the original application. w w
w
Based on the lack of information and inconsistencies on the applicant's part, I have ga =.
reviewed the information available to determine if a reasonably accurate determination N D
could be made as to how many replacement trees would be required. = d.
There are three factors that relate to the replacement of trees which we do not have z o
precise information on. They include the location of the shoreline zone, the number of w w
trees removed from within the shoreline zone and the size of those trees removed.
.off'
0 !-.
Please see Attachments 1 and 2 for my evaluation of these factors using the information w w
we have available. Based on the analysis in these attachments, I recommend that 54
replacement trees be provided. "-- o.
uiz:
o
I recommend that the trees be required to be planted prior to the end of October, 1996, _;
of
and that such planting be based on a planting plan the applicant submits to DCD for
approval prior to planting. The reason for the deadline is to ensure the trees will be
planted before the winter season arrives. Failure to meet this deadline would mean the
trees could not be planted until next spring.
The tree ordinance requires a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches (deciduous) or 6 -8 foot
height (coniferous) for replacement trees.
PART 11- SHORELINE PERMIT
2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP:
The site is within the jurisdiction of the City of Tukwila SMP and is consistent with the
goals and policies of that SMP. With implementation of the tree ordinance provisions, it
will not adversely affect land use, economic development, public access, circulation or
recreation along the shoreline.
t
3. TUKWILA SHORELINE REGULATIONS:
Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the City of Tukwila Shoreline
Zone (TMC 18.44):
18.44.110 - General Shoreline Regulations
All uses within the shoreline zone must conform to the following general regulations:
(1) The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district.
(2) The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program
or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations.
(3) No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such
structure protects or promotes the public interest.
Comment: No use or structures are proposed at this time.
(4) There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment
unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as a part of an approved
shoreline substantial development permit.
Comment: Trees were removed without a shoreline substantial development permit.
This permit is to bring that activity into compliance. A tree permit has also been applied
for and replacement trees will be required.
(5) No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality
classification.
Comment: The project will not discharge effluent into the river.
(6) All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with.
Comment: Responsibility of the applicant. No impacts are identified
(7) Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected.
Comment: Habitat for birds and small mammals has been removed. Tree replacement
per the tree ordinance will mitigate.
(9) All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal
agencies.
Comment: Applicant is requesting approval after the fact.
eask
A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) was issued on September 4, 1996. The
comment period expired without receipt of comments.
6. RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the shoreline permit. The primary impacts will be addressed via the tree permit
and land altering permit process.
G:. Y:14a4uSL. fiti: ll4.«.N. C;: GYYrkS:;.tv..:':: xl GJ: lti1. sYiJ 44.i.:L,:.fy:.:ea.
Attachment 1 - Shoreline Zone Delineation
The applicant has not provided a survey showing the location of the shoreline
zone or trees that have been removed, thus making it difficult to apply the
requirements of the tree ordinance.
z
The applicant has made two submittals as to the location of the shoreline zone, 1- w
which conflict with each other. The most recent consists of aerial photograph 6 D'
with the shoreline zone identified and the trees removed from within that zone i o�
circled. It shows the shoreline zone being located west of where shown on the N LL°1 .
original application. Information on file at DCD, my measurements using the i
same photograph, and a site measurement taken by myself and Gary Schulz, all co u
wO
indicate the shoreline zone is further west (thus encompassing more of the site 2
and more trees) than the applicant has indicated on the photograph. g Q
co n
1. Barghausen Engineers prepared a plan for development of the adjacent site to I w.
the north which shows the location of the shoreline. On this plan, the shoreline z 1
zone shown is 23 feet further west than the location as identified by the z o
applicant. w
D o:
2. I have confirmed the scale of the photograph submitted by the applicant .o ��.
appears fairly accurate at 1" = 150'. It has been enlarged - the original was 1 ' = ',°,I '-
2000'. I verified the accuracy of the 150 scale by measuring the building next 9!
door to the north. According to plans on file, that building is 60 feet wide. On u- o:
the photograph it measures 0.4 inches wide. Multiply 150 by 0.4 = 60 feet. ui
U w.
F-H'
O
z
I measured from where I thought the shoreline is located - recognizing that with
tree cover, difficult scale and the applicants' drawn in line covering the shoreline,
there is room for error, but I believe it is a conservative estimate that the
applicants line, as measured at the north property line, is at least 10 -15 feet too
far east.
3. Gary Schulz and I investigated the site at the time of the violation and took a
rough measurement. At that time there were several trees (already substantially
pruned and /or cut down) that were in the immediate vicinity of the 200 foot line
(which seemed to correspond more closely with the Barghausen Plan than the
Sanft aerial).
Conclusion: Lacking a survey, I have evaluated the information we have
available. I believe the Barghausen plan to be the best available information,
and my measurements, though not extending as far west as the Barghausen
plan, concur that the 200 foot zone is further west than has been identified by the
applicant.
Attachment 2 - How many trees were removed from the shoreline zone?
What size were they?
How many replacement trees required per the formula (TMC
18.54.130(3))?
The applicant identified 5 trees as being cut down (Nos. 2 -6 on his list). We
concur that those five trees were cut down. The applicant also indicates one
unidentified species of a "bush" has been cut down (No. 7 on the list) This
vegetation appears substantial on the aerial photograph, and most likely would
meet the definition of a tree. The applicant also indicated there were three holly
bushes removed. Holly bushes meet the definition of trees in the zoning code
and are subject to tree replacement. Total trees identified by the applicant = 9.
Upon investigating the complaint, Gary Schulz and I observed that one of these
trees shattered where it hit the ground, indicating that it was rotted, and that it
likely would have been exempt from the tree permit.
In addition, there are other trees that are not circled which appear to be subject
to tree removal. Circles added by me and labeled A, .B and D indicate where
there are at least one tree each that have been removed. Given the scale of the
photo and the shadows, it is difficult to determine if other trees are located in
those circles. It is possible there are. Trees A and B are near the 200 foot line,
but given the errors in the applicants delineation of the shoreline zone it is
probable that they are within 200 feet.
Circle D is in a denser area of trees and it is difficult to pick out any individual
trees. However, upon our field visit, Gary Schulz and I observed several trees in
this area that had been substantially pruned - including a cluster of maples with
maybe six trunks extending from it, and two poplars. Thus, depending on how
many trees the maple cluster would be considered to be, it is probable there
were 5 - 8 eight trees located in this area.
Total trees removed (excluding the rotted tree) then could be anywhere from 15-
20, depending on the location of the shoreline zone and the number of trees that
cannot be identified by the aerial photographs at hand.
What size were the trees that were removed?
The applicant has indicated that trees are between 8 -10 inches in the list he
provided on August 29, 1996. There is no supporting documentation as to these
sizes. During earlier conversations with the applicant, he indicated he had no
idea what size the trees were. Most of these trees were mature as evidenced by
photographs of the site from 1986, which leads me to believe the applicant's size
estimates are too small.
ssxteuct esnmanerenzewsavnrms- YA+mda?itrer. ••,•,, ars... yca.wn.•RT•,.•- r.,v***,....tos. +»ru,,..,.«,,,, r., n•..rm- r,w..•.naMa•n. gy' }�..mw,....�.�nct�!Y� <T�'r
z
�Z
re= w
QQ
J0..
00,
J=
LL,
•
wo
IL
o N:
w W;
1.
LI o'
iz:
=,
:o
z
How many trees are required per the replacement formula?
Given all the uncertainties, I would recommend that the reasonable approach
would be to require replacement for 18 trees (mid way between the estimated
number of trees removed) and assuming half the trees were 12 - 18 inches in
diameter - and the other half were 8 - 12 inches. Applying the formulas then, a
total of 54 replacement trees would be required (9x2) + (9x4) = 18 + 36 = 54.
1
A F F I D A V I T
I, \II__VI A /V\CIkLLFJ
LI Notice of Public Hearing
fl Notice of Public Meeting
El Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
LI Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
fl Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
0 Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
O F D I S T R I B U T I O N
hereby declare that:
fl Notice of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit
KShoreline Management Permit
was mailed to each of
cD i eV - of- ECcuoi 1
� A rztiJ1EWSfLfloP
to 00- 1- 1-1-63
e1 -1MPIA , wA 93 -1 -773
0 Determination of Non -
significance
0 Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
0 Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
0 Notice of Action
Official Notice
O Other
Other,
the following addresses on -I " Z - 910
Wlk s Al DPNEj Gp4ORAL
C,bLoLiy Ot497.
�0 13 140 11-7
bL1/ P1A , JA °►
C1n
�-' BUc Wogic. 0 Lowe:- SAN=�
Sou cEN --&Z
Lv1f (¢ 1 zi) 5 Z N+) J S
11AAL w►JN- , LOA cl g $ 8' SEAS , W A- 10 t�,,
Name of Project SA'V f I L-D k t E Signature -S G- pier r t, t
File Number 1 --'110 - 002-10
I
A F F I D A V I T 1
5
O Notice of Public Hearing
O Notice of Public Meeting
O Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
O Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
0 Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
0 Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
jotice of Application for
horeline Management Permit
0 Shoreline Management Permit
O F D I S T R I B U T I O N
hereby declare that:
0 Determination of Non -
significance
Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
fl Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
fl Notice of Action
0 Official Notice
0 Other
0 Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on
`111\ADLIPer
QAN 0•14116--
Waitka
Name of Project l Ailt\ 0\.14
File Number L l (o — 5C71 i)
Signature
�Z
QQw
J V;
0
w.:
w =:
J
w 0
LL Q'
1C!'
se a
U
0 1—
= Vi
o
w '
Z
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
ACTIVITY #: L96 -0026
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that,.LOUI,E SANFT has filed,
an application for a 'SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT permit for:
SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW CLEARING OF VEGETATION
WITHIN THE 'SHORELINE ZONE
LOCATED AT: 14440 INTERURBAN AV
within the 23/23/04
in Tukwila:, Kino County, Washington. The said development is proposed to be
within 200,.teet of the Gr•ee:n.RivertDuwami c h and /or its associated wetlands.
Any per ~con ;deg icing to express his views or to be notified of the action
taken on �this app ication sshould notify JOHN :JIMERSON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION, CITY OF TUKWILA,
6300 SOUTHCENTER :.BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188, in
writing his within 30 .('thirty) day of the final date of
publ icatiun of this notice which is Jul 19, 1996.
Written comments, must be received by Aug 19, 1996
Published in Seattle Times - Jul 12, 1996
2nd Publication: Seattle Times - Jul 19, 1996
Distribution: City Clerk k Mayor, Adjacent ' Property Owners, Department of
Ecology, Prottier•ty Owner, ',:Fi 1`e ,.
"'f+F.L:!rF.i+tn. \Y�V� :rni.i J:Wr.NM2[n' Y U1]Wt K1.M @YSA' .1tJ .ai.n.'bA j. ^ 6. ,ax.fI:
n
+tt�TP�YevrE+... .yi . " :o •
***************************************4 t****************************************
COMMENTS
BATCH:NUMBER: QV
CUSTOMER:NAME LOUIE SANFT,
*:
47;',t4444-f.,,Zi.);(4';;•:4;4-"•—•
232304,7'90011.02
KING COUNTY
500'4THIAVE
SEATTLE-WA
336590.+71370-04:
PO:BOX:58248
TUKWILAWA
3365901570.'02,
G;T:OEVELOPMENT:
..-6437S144TH,,ST: •
• SEATTLEWA
336590...7.1650-05
jONES'ELMERcR
40533 196TH-AVE'SE
) ENUMCLAW.WA,
; ,•'. • . •
" • •
' .
si.
• i336590-1365-01: .. • •
0381' ! SAGHI,-,J;MENTERPRISES' •4N1359,
2298. PACIFICAVE
98133. SAN.FRANCISCOCA 94115
AN054,
98138
709999
98168
1:336590-1390-00-
'14501!INTERURBAN.AVE S'
TUKWILE.WA•
336590-1600-06 .
STARK.BEW
POBOX,98638
' SEATTLE:WA
3597000023.706
'SAGHI.VM;ENTERPRISES;.
2298 PACIFICAVE
SAN FRANCISCO.CA
880483'
98168
E1280
98189
4N1359
94115
•‘,
I
A F F I D A V I T
O Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
O Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
O Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
Q Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
0 Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
K:otice of Application for
horeline Management Permit
0 Shoreline Management Permit
O F D I S T R I B U T I O N
hereby declare that:
O Determination of Non -
significance
0 Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
J Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
0 Notice of Action
1] Official Notice
Other
f3 Other
was ma to each of the following addresses on 744
[./W
1(17qcly 1/(q°i(to
Name of Project
File Number Lei (r, (57)7,-(e
Signature
• •z
• U O'.
CE.
CO
w =:
J
:CO LL
:w O.
J:
LL ..:t•
•
I-w
f- O
Z F-:•
2
Da
O N
ti 0.
iii z
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
ACTIVITY #: L96 -0026
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that LOUIE SANFT has filed
an application for a SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT permit for:
SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW CLEARING OF VEGETATION
WITHIN THE SHORELINE ZONE
LOCATED AT: 14440 INTERURBAN AV S
within the 23/23/04
in Tukwila, King County, Washington. The said development is proposed to be
within 200 feet of the Green River /Duwamish and /or its associated wetlands.
Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action
taken on this application should notify JOHN JIMERSON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION, CITY OF TUKWILA,
6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188, in
writing his interest within 30 (thirty) days of the final date of
publication of this notice which is Jul 19, 1996.
Written comments must be received by Aug 19, 1996
Published in : Seattle Times - Jul 12, 1996
2nd Publication: Seattle Times - Jul 19, 1996
Distribution: City Clerk, Mayor, Adjacent Property Owners, Department of
Ecology, Property Owner, File
F- w
JU:
.0 O'.
N 0:
, .: co w
w
N w:
w O:
u_ Q,
CO ` •
w;
Z
U Di
iO Ni
• ,w w;
-- U z
.O:
ui
U (`
O
z
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR
• SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
ACTIVITY #: L96 -0026
NOTICE I'S HEREBY GIVEN that LOUIE SANFT has filed
an application for a 'SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT permit t for:
SHORELINE PERMIT TO ALLOW CLEARING OF VEGETATION
WITHIN THE 'SHORELINE ZONE
,LOCATED AT: 14440 INTERURBAN AV
within the 23/23/04
in Tukwila,. 4: i n9 County, Washington. The said development is proposed to be
within 200 feet of the Green River /Duwamish and /or its as ociated we.tlands.
Any pers.on desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action
taken on t.h is application should notify JOHN JIMER'SON
DEPART►IENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING, DIVISION, CITY OF TUKWILA,
6300 'SOUTHCENTER .BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, TUJK':WILA, WASHINGTON 981818, irn
writing h:is interest within 30 (thirty) .day" of the final date of
pub 1 i cat iin of this notice which is Jul 19, 1996.
Written comments, must be received by Aug 19, 1996
'Published. in 'Seattle Tidies - Jul 12, 1996
2nd Publication: Seattle Time:=. - Jul '19, 1996
Distribution: City Clerk, Mayor, . Adjacent Property Owners, Department of
Ecology, Pr�oper-�tyOwner, File
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
TRANSMITTED BY FAX
July 8, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE" -L96- 0026''& L96 -0027
Dear Mr. Sanft:
This is to follow up on my letter of three weeks ago in which I reminded you the above
referenced applications have been found to be incomplete.
New regulations become effective on July 10, 1996 which will affect those applications if
you do not complete them before that date. The changes would result in a requirement
that you provide mailing labels for residents and owners within 500 feet of the site
(currently it is 300 feet), provide a 4' x 4' board with a notice of application on the site, and
could require additional plans and information to be submitted 'to'meet the standards for a
complete application.
If you do not meet this deadline, you will need to obtain new application forms from the
City which identify the information necessary for a complete application.
If you have questions on these matters, please call me at 431 -3663.
Si cerely,
4,/
ohn Jerson
Assoc ate Planner
cc: City Attorney
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96- 0020& L96 -0027
Dear Mr. Sanft:
As you recall, two weeks ago when you submitted your application
for a shoreline permit, I accepted the application but explained
that you need,,. to provide public notice mailing labels for a
complete application. This is a reminder that you need to provide
the mailing jabels for property owners and tenants within a 300
foot radius and the assessors maps showing those properties. Until
we receive the labels and map(s) your application is deemed to be
incomplete and will not be processed.
Regarding your tree permit application, Gary Schulz, Urban
Environmentalist, reviewed aerial photographs and estimates there
were roughly 15 trees removed from the shoreline zone, which is
significantly higher than the 3 trees you've noted on your plan.
Give this discrepancy and that we cannot precisely identify after
the fact the number, size, and species of the trees removed, DCD
has determined the tree canopy cover approach is appropriate to
determine the number of replacement trees required (TMC
18.54.140(b).
This approach requires that you provide a minimum canopy cover of
200 of the site. Each tree planted is considered to cover 314
square feet. (Thus, site area in square feet x .2/314 = number of
trees required).
In order to complete your tree permit application, we need you to
provide the site area in square feet within the shoreline zone,
plug it into the formula above, and provide a planting plan showing
the size, location and species of the required number of trees.
If you have questions on these matters, please call me at 431 -3663.
Si• er dI;I l
r
n Ji rson
ssoci. 'e Planner
cc: C "ty Attorney
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
i ce. i•'tVki;WN,i.n1.1 / 4,14An , ; dni. Hsu:..caa..w..rus.m..v.ww.uua.H
z
i1
~c
o w
J U;
00:
to
co w
J �.
u.
w
(-120
—w
f-0
Z
111 uj
p:
ON
0 H`
ww
=U
Z.
v �
O ~:
z
June 16, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96 -0026 & L96 -0027
Dear Mr. Sanft:
As you recall, two weeks ago when you submitted your application
for a shoreline permit, I accepted the application but explained
that you need to provide public notice mailing labels for a
complete application. This is a reminder that you need to provide
the mailing labels for property owners and tenants within a 300
foot radius and the assessors maps showing those properties. Until
we receive the labels and map your application is deemed to be
incomplete and will not be processed.
Regarding your tree permit application, Gary Schulz, Urban
Environmentalist, reviewed aerial photographs and estimates there
were roughly 15 trees removed from the shoreline zone, which is
significantly higher than the 3 trees you've noted on your plan.
Give this discrepancy and that we cannot precisely identify after
the fact the number, size, and species of the trees removed, DCD
has determined the tree canopy cover approach is necessary to
determine the number of replacement trees required (TMC
18.54.140 (b) .
This approach requires that you provide a minimum canopy cover of
200 of the site. Each tree planted is considered to cover 314
square feet (Site Area x .2/314 = number of trees required).
In order to complete processing of your tree permit application, we
need you to provide the site area within the shoreline zone, plug
it into the formula above, and provide a planting plan showing the
size, location and species of the required number of trees.
If you have any questions on these matters, don't hesitate to call
.me at 431 -3663.
Sincerely,
John Jimerson
Associate Planner
cc: City Attorney
z
F- •
w;
J U
0
CO CI
W
J I-,
w O• }
gJ:
tL Q:
a
• W.
_-
Z
I- 0
Z 1-
0:
O N'
ui
• V
U. O:
pEE
lllZ
O
z
SHORELINE SUBSTI' TIAL DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: REM D V E 1-179- bot4.S T,eF'
FROM I TE-; CLe J- (,cf 'S T OF GA-eaRG, beseiT
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection)
/ 4400 rvT&R.t tr2t3AN /EIiLIE SO LATH
Quarter:
Section: Township: Range:
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
3. APPLICANT:* Name: Li) IA.I E &A-NSFT
Address. (o12,0 sZ.'*e- AVE, ■ti-E S& 0-74-11 - f}tiis4, q8 Ha
Phone: 2OCa ' 72Z • (o ?Zq-
Signature: �� .� _ . _ _ Date: 5/2-E/1 ( ,
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
4. PROPERTY Name: A L S, P FT £, LO tit le SA N Fr
OWNER
Address: t ,12-0 5Z nae AUEN L 4 . 6 e . f t t s 2 . 618 I I '
Phone: -O (a ' 7 (O $ &
I /WE,[signature(s)]
swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this
application are true and correct to the
best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 5 ZB,r-ti, RECEIVED
CI CITY OF TUKWILA
MAY 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
t�+r � +i}�f ci,!{ .1�'l..u.^k*Y�k?et _ Y3±t.,.p•r. -m. ..�.`+TSv' iv • maa�ak± l^ �R�' �rH�a" ro"` T° r*t'«.a:"s,'c`"eemihWYCGrr^Wni. c..mr�Rw�ieaxA +i�.t�Ch xvmrfvavaw4 "N�cw;,.rAt*,6rOIM.x. r.P.Pe Wk'1"• itil ''
z
=Z
fX ~w
6
-J C.)
UO
CO CI
to W
J I:
N u.
w O.
a
= W
z�
Z o'a
o N,
O H
= • U,
tit O.
wz
U=
0
z
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 2
5. Present use of property: VAC r•3T- P 20 P .
6. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project (include additional future
developments contemplated but not included in this application): 5cen bo
7. List the master program policies (use program sections or page numbers) which are applicable
to this development:
8. List any other permits for this project from state, federal or local governmental agencies for which
you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has
been applied for (and if so, the date of the application), whether the application was approved or
denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit:
SE PA Apfl i cat cm-
-- Tree_ Qe.ew, i t
L.a. wnd A I-1'er Pe,rw.
9. Nature of the existing shoreline. Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood
plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such
as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any (to be completed
by local official):
10. In the event that any of the proposed builidngs or structures will exceed a height of thirty -five feet
above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential
units existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view (to be completed by local official):
N/A .
z
_�
Z
C4 2
J U
0
U O
Mal
W I
J �.
W O.
L Q.
_ d`
I- _,
Z
Z of
111 Lu;
• o
U
O —
o
W W'
• U
LI O:.
Z.
W
U •
z
' `SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 3
11. If the application involves a Conditional Use or Variance, set forth in full that portion of the Master
Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a
Variance, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official):
12. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within
one thousand (1,000) feet in all directions from the development site:
TO 71--k t3O eT I STS &,T r &VE: Lop Y) eN)7-
CDr2Po12f}T1Df�; TO Z'�}r� �UU?Y}�STSfd.IICS S .
(Fsc5ni INA-egH
(A, c cie) ~FI C To i-f -F-E, W-ST is
VAcA-NT pp01,62:Ty A-i i J) n1TEK.l RZA-N AV6N Lt /i7)
S aE t) 12_1116._e._ .ry Fa►2T-
0
,DST PA-e_ K. .
1
Z
• a
Z
• Itw:
n,
U
00
0.
W=
J f-i
N LLi
w0
'.
• J'
Z
mo:.
• Z•F-
w w. .
•
ww
:H -
'u' .0 •
_Z
U N
•
Z
1.
A-1)1 e SS OF ry l ft-00 2 u / J Gr P9 77 .
6iT 1/6.-L•DPM6-1%-)7- Cor.t ,el=9-7-7ak)
,4L37 ex: H-7 /1711-1-6-
7p ►-�
.20G. /3o5'
E R / s r
14600 1-1 tCY t- -bah A-ve . So
Mcie vl Goy, i • 9g/678
plf)#•ao6 • a 43. ype0
.r ,' 1 >,.; +, . `�a'3i, ,r3. ^st; :': •, };yiYd:�Irar'�Yi:,+.u. 'ti iw tk:':FtiL{a.1 e 'ytiv:�ri`t „:.�'4 N'i:z� + ?���tr:ltti5�+ ��s���IrJ•. int e,xla -'
5
■
Z.73761)::"
-Stig.zrovtPl w
1175184., •
8200 .
rylc• rlfg2P 11,14Ff:
07 0 - • -
,
• • coiZ5v st .1i111410.14
St
'1:3 .S Cs•ct;S:',T .31 •
• 1,3
e!.
S
10t1 .
•- S 61116014 ; a
A; Pzt
• • :11.
I • 'Ss! 11 0 -40'. c.; , •
,!S CLosICRITALE 2Ic ,St
)
rfr.6.,
ritchard Island
et1C/1 Park
11 4600;1'
.W▪ Astnr
• Cley Park
361•1.1. 1,041.4.4M• 'PURI
ss op"
st
RECMED
CITY OF TUKWILA
MAY 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
k
K.!
CO AAAAA
BRYN MAWR
; - I' ;;;; * :•:".::. .
v ,
g.... » r, . .1
> 171I/i • 1 Si
3 OITH ' •
; ;.: I i I.L.; 49 : E.1....1/■,%.„ Sr . ( ,
. : B 5;),U L E 1A1;20;:, .1
I, 18161 441.., SI a .
t TeT-,i./..f ,t,'...ii,v--:
PARKl fs'
- ' 4 '
.' ST ' 4
. . 11116 St
inn. ;It ''''' n
r4,1 f ;
i'..P'1, .„.
11X0 ft 1
S, iOS1
S 17p. S,
t ;.".7t; V!'.... .
S IN,- i It fc
1 120.4 if ....
S 1:11■1• SI
.."7•1.(1)31
1I. :"
.1
tit:'• C.., 1‘?F•hi,I,',..,\-,1:.\ ,
S.- .1..\\
7:491°"1:::1
t,.ir___V.?) isisK ....,,•4t,„
. .........k ,
\ , • I
\
• ,,:... 'Pi. '
• ",, •F, i ii
z •
i : •
•:
.1. v. .6.. ..0 I 6. 04, fir-s -
z FIIV....ER.i
1. C
:e• ts
, . ,, T. , • ,..,.....y.. Sr • • 'c .1.1,22,10 .11
i ... ?.■ i
6. .,■11'." ', s.,01
5 111TH 54'7" C.) • .i
• cr1 F. 2 • ••.„ s stilt -Sr 's ...if. i 21'.41: r21' .s
.,,, .,,,,,..,,,...:,,,...4,::,5, :"--;:lisT.6.'i,,,:ii.
• 0.
:It; S. : E• Et `1. .. s !la. si „A ` •
Mb n z i'n"
:7,t1,,it...t.)i.,:s.19.3110.:r...NT:
i,,, -.7,1.*:4.,:tim as t,...411:•
::77,•-•-11,:t i ido
›'A.
SOLD,*
11,4
S "1.1.;::: * -'-i*
- ---.
'‘',14:T.°4Ne' ' • • i ..ss: x,11,9,,,, ..:1 : ;pi .:yet ; . .. ?,„ I. I x, .
a Z Pli 40 , I N.\ ' , ° e'lls•,, _
-AIRPORT
' .t. ,
0 . . I.
y .4, • •
!?!...?..V. ss iiilcors.,....
"Fiiiroii ..-..
•• •••.' i 131TH .5 • ,,,...z.S0 ,,1,1A,.. 3 mreolkk ST \\_."' ,g..tly,c.6.7...V-{, . .
• • H E S 11YD ...
6 gin St; i
.., 1111 ji Sea: l';:.",:r% 4'
PA-6 , S., 0
/ .44..
. ,,,,',.,,,,C.''.11 j ""4 " 70 tft1C-7.2.1 illttf ":..4.1:!..,.....k ft Nm f ic, s.,...lii..„..,,,,:l,,,,,.,
,. 21 R e tr' :: -1-6,74.---• ,,
; ,
' --- g 1:-T.,..._....-.-,ii:A-i_;,--.1 -, z-: R I V E ,F2,,T., 0, ...,N ,i ! a; iz., - • s • • •.. .........
1 11', .ssi 136TH
S 112tr
I ./ 1 1371. A
-1
s_. es.t.■ sf
V ... s,;,. !;" r.......
1
„ --7r--
1 .igir. St
• .i. st
c *E ■ park IT -- !. • .•:. • 2 , . 3.'" "
4 : 2: 1 $ ;dais • " -st t e0C4..."..... Lf--...,n.
p
; .". 'T
sa ' 0
•• 57' ''-; ' fr,,
4i1174:!,'87.4.11.11:::
./...,',dlff
:Over . 4 ''',..,;.1.4te , ,IF' '
v 1 Ogrks'
..-.‘ •
S. Sunset Co ! .1 • ! .. s nt, A 54 s! RiSenon,!. S. it .,,F,10,,S1... , ER,0 , ...,.,■, , -sr--.....,
,>! ..1' IOU!
sy*:
ta
:, .141....%,,0,6
.,..0 S 3 ;133330 5. i... . -. 3 I
• ilk -7...... . 1 . 3. 1.1131
$ 11401.1. ST- - 1 ..... ,s: .1.. Intilei. ..a./.71.ili,;co.
400 ; 7i.. 1 5 IDu o3u;r1 / . ''' ' : i
":: "` 'sr" 'il .... ..... isTi
.1. . . Ilt
7, ji li 11.111 .%, 41.3 il lii >
ION R. .1 .0. Z . N .3, ;. a' , s* 4^, 7 ° . \j 1,..
...-.4-.1/151.51.....-S1-.• 1 s.:;,... .. . .
•:7.•..•.: • Fi
...1 " .-Stso-11.1 'in [11") .--;ki
6'1181's-1c:517
.......4...... , A
..."....;.: Etal:;!:.4":' If ,...'7:::.,•„_.,%',....
aztffikirFweEpittil +1'., i
WV
3 MIND ST
cs
.I. . 1
‘";:•: •
.'4.
' '.k...,, • g:t4 ,
• 4 ..-6.
1
kfi• R..,..:11 V. E. R T. 0_ N . . .,..,,,.
El HTS ' A s 13S1 St
- I.*
151714 7 47 ST
T.'S '''' -
1 171■15'"" •
' i; Sr' 151111.._;., SI ....
0 $111111 ST
- •-41b. • S 131145!
1/
-1-111SI
ro,:whn tuft, s.
:-.1,
..:
0.1.,.
.,-..
\ \I
.,..,
-1 41' ItLe:,■.: ..v.tiiii. iii;,....: ....16.. 11161C
0 31. 1611 11"
...„...___.
-,,i i
,..i!...,/i.
1 • ',.. . C. ..,
io IR
.G. c4.c HUH ST. s 110,"
'..,.'' . : •i -!S 1
6.; ....../, 64 • .-
„e,,,,.,, 166 M/4, ; ,
t i ' • , . li‘ ) c.
\S 61'4, ISS ST
Istws.-.
: *tc13111
ta
‘...4' 1
I L I. 01,07PCS
...rr.,,,
'al Al.: It
v. . . _,....- 0
.•
... ...,,::,-, ' ,.
• ,... ....!
ry
'.>.' 11.:i..'4.■ o • .• ,
, ISPIN ff 5 ''''...,. ' i...2.”' " .' ----'1 •
‘ •)N117 00 6• 1?31; ktitt 6 .0.
c'-s:-.31,.:,1,14s.s7.s.. , 8-at' ... . •• •.., s....:■,..s., ss
1 :;!_..;t1:ffiri 1166111 St; tinT
4 .
,..., %
s J4i * '.1. g. .1 1 16.61111 ir. r-
:::..,7..s ws,:st:
'. j • : .c. e s 161111. 11 -- 4 'a•
1-1 tIlifOrriva-1
STRAND'S. LVON •LL.....„.... _,,
7
\ •i>„..,
,
• -•-•-•,-.t;,:..f.-::
...:;.- ... '.:..: .,..., ,.JV V:: St
Viv 1,1st•"..
C
'..).• ... s ITN I- .St
..-7-----
I winV IT :
t ti A ).
: • : . ':!,, 12 ,..5 ,.s , Ms' k. . .- 5 .. .)",,s .- • • .1i,.:3t. . S • --1 N .'j. e-,,s -: .„ 1i.t1-2Ln7:qtO7 : 61esa,l1„. o. La1. --..,1
omO .. 7.. 4. .. %. . .
s g.- LT,0tI 1 . T;: ■ ; ••t .1 . n"A.Z
,
.e_' 1. qp. m1:4 '.,1, .• . oK 7,3s,, " kS , .-,* - t .e
...I..4 .
L.1 '
. T• T.
.T.''1, . AA E,rI •.! .• l „bc'R .,i J.L,i1.:.E' l'i4.-. 4.A .l: 4 4 ,t•.i t .4! . 1 . 6 1 . 1ii 1 77i. 3 r7,1ik.R.A• 9! i::. 7l' tt 1,!,e "..,A7-. 0 ,: 1 ,.444"ic fe 1.... 4.,.i k .-t. : !,..4"*i LYVr,' .
11:,', 1 .... .4-.',4.:.; .4'i 10 (: iY•'i,,t,y; ' '7 4 '").' ... ,.■...,; :
; 5T .
; :3 • - 2:i . 1. ■, , ... ' .1..f.;. 1. r . " .1„,.! , 3s ,_ .M.
, F
.c M..• :4 ,I. ,'1..'i : 1.C..i ' 6- rJ ,
KT;
• ; ' s , i_' . 1 E. l . 2 ; ., •1 31 N 1 . 7• 1_1. ,,• .1 _- •."i1i -m_1 9'1I2..-i 2-1tn, ;1 HEIGHTS
EIGHTS
a
1r-.4
- : --
P :
- 911
, _T5 .
illUoT"I.".. H t-
K.t :•W"_1 i . ...I/..L-i,/s/ .
;gA
a i 1
1t
...1', e .1 .
l? I
I A 7 •
IW ,f
---.,
,
“ • ' \. .
P i 30 _ i
111TH 1 /”T . S •i / 1
1 m s . 11 14, ' ' i• .
b
t
if (
3 ;1 0TSH 8
.itai;t°M •/
3 i I ' 3 l
1 i■,. 1 l , 11 /Idg •
.r21 7 41 5•1tTH L '1" 3 g 3;;. rti"t, ;' 6 i 1 1111“ ,T:.. ) . -•
'. 7
..
,.,..
,
•
2
P. s s • -
)76301i-!D 1 :> ' 1 2
SIL St A 21,: mb 4 17.iii■b
.--,= ,. ." e 1,0•0 ... i, ,1t,,) ci.,1 -
2
• Rsi nsti-wr
• g
• .1
MHO IT
PROJECT SCOPE
TO REMOVE LARGE BLACK COTTONWOOD TREE WHICH IS A DANGER
TO G.T. DEVELOPMENT CORP. (neighbors)
TO REMOVE DEBRIT PEOPLE DUMPED ON THE SITE
TIRES, CONCRETE, CARPET, SOFAS, GARBAGE, ETC:
TO REMOVE REMAINING DEBRIS & STUMPS AT 200 FEET AND BEYOND
* TO GRADE TO LEVEL SITE
CO W;
• W =;
'W Oi
• Jl
W,Q.
• .r
I- _: •
O;
Z1 ;
•
W W;.
:ice f"
W W
,= V;
H.
LU U Nf.
"X' .
Lir
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
MAY 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
' x` s' tiY .iii'.tic] &1:.ii.'u't�!s41 ::? Y. " "i..,... •ccti:.Ww s„F.;�tiiioz�
,—r
Planner:
Receipt Number:
Applicant Notified
Applicant Notified of Complete Application:
Notice of Application Issued:
SEPA CHECKLIST
APPLICATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
File Number:
Cross - reference files:
of Incomplete Application:
A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT:
B. LOCATION (address and assessors parcel number(s)):
4 4 OO NT6-2 -ut.R d .) ,k J 6N l& SO L,tTi-i TUIK W I LAS .
Quarter: Section: Township:
This information may be found on your tax statement
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
VAS NT Lfvt- t
D. APPLICANT Name:
Address:
Phone:
Signature:
Range:
Lo L. l E S F-r
Lo 1 ZO 5Z1141- AV& . Sp WT}F 5.)&411t2E1 WA. 418118
2-0(D- %ZZ -(o 8ZLI- Date:
5/2 g/C1
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
MAY 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
in tel.WO :itiGdc'l +�
`i
E131N30 11Wd3d
. : aa...! r,.. n,. nt.! �• urs�.,. �.. �.+ �r, �. L�. Y. errx< na: rrtww. nas, r�:!N VT!'? Y;" YA1!! p. h�:C: m.?,v.+,n.�!%n +y^.ns:r('.,'C.: Xi!ntir » n�; �t'%"_`' ii�.+..y..�:r ?YM?S}� °.i,?. :.7nm ,.,,,.}iatS'fr"c+.,•�'rx°r
<
, z
w
6 D.
0
0 0:
CO O.
Ill'
I:
CO
uj 0,
2
g
x w
;
Z
i-0
Z F".;
W
2 n'
0,
0 'AI
0
I 161
1- P!
LI 0:
LLI
0 =
n!E!nIMF tjl
1�. iK. «'c:: ada�:.;repsti:::i+. •,v,r..= x•::�t;hu�::e:a•, __':rti� _ `•mod -4 *; ?aiid.'4,2 .:si44a4. '.4:rr:ta'sif.,_ 1�.?;eas't .i y aKa rs;u•.�c�.., r46u:e4� �:: ' ^'.�:'Yji:i,....,:,�..e...�,s. k .,w'<n`ry >�e;v -rivA
z•
'H Z:
LA.W'
UO;
ai •
;fn Wi •
• ILI =1
J H
LL
'W
• z �
I- OH
zI
WUJ
• 1.)'(.01.
.i0. —!•
3��t• •
• , W;
•
�tti Z i
1
• 07.
;Z:'.
W6.5
ZGb Ue•41J VI2oNM T
1,0'
401
1>
{Hblf IMP4cr
Ewv► mom w+&or
Cow TN+Paci R'VfR
VI ad tueNi ttivozporoi&
St-top- UN& PgryTht,E,
sort t i " = 4o'
— V f.W F-o net- c6tt-M6-e..
OF PIe.)P &FT`f.
MEI11.1 itleA WATT.
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
MAY 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
N.
Z'
•J o .
•.o O
:co Ot,
:CO W; .•
•w I.
J �
WO,
•
wa..
_
1=0
'z l-:
•ww
2 O;
U Or
iQ ••
• F-V;
WEST
ZGO 14 2&431 6NVIRoNM&NT-
SC4 -1.-t I 11.= 40 /
Z
• W
re
2i.
Ioo
(.W =
•
i J I
VIEW Fteov W o
OF- PP-C) rr ! .2
" TREES B2uSH A- tor•Z%
QI V ft E.v 1 126 N W &ar w?
625 S6S t4 N) S1'h ,z ~'
moo`.
PL4I+ r r 6, oWArr1 -1 �. Z
.
RE -PArr I N► N G P to 00
°I-;
w w.
S U;
w (0
z:.
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
MAY 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
File:
L qoO
3Smrn Drawing#
I- Z
JV
U O;;
v)W
W =;
Jam•
w O:
.I- w
F-0.
;Z Ht.
W w'
;D pi
UN.
W W'_
= V;
O}
w Z
to
Z.
:• e�,::..::. �icia tiia�:. �u: l}. st ;:,i,:..w.'a:x,x•Jt,•cu�...::ti a�r.>• erirw.:; h: ti ;..::,,;:.ixa:.n.`uvv.u�;n:�•.t •:d3 •: 4,- F•�kc.a itl
1
KING COUNTY
DEPT.. OF ASSESSMENTS
s, 144TH ST.
SE 14!;23.;4
TINS MAR II 1,04 THY puRpoic
ASSISTING IN LOCATING YOUR
. TO SNOW ACCURATi DIEDJURZar
PROP2417 AND III NOT OUR
a /I 41.
23 - 23 - 4
SCALE' 1%100'
¶ rrr—Aig*vr
MAP REV.
•
A 0,•et.A, A
(M•A1
...1 A•r• .4.i.i.
1 V '
IAT:0; 0
tt 4 • It!.. tti • Z.1
Z ▪ • 7:i____44.
re/MCI- .56
, Y TU144446-66 • 5.
Y"' I 13406140785 t
t.] k" ' LOT 2
r
: 0.000,1 i 0;0 Ili
,..;....1.....„.. ,....„.:
... . .
t La snaova ,,. , / so •
., i. ...A... O/....-
.../.
i,.t.. 44
veto
-3 S. 147TH ST. ..... ....a ,.( a 04 a e. .aa 0302130
.0
e•w
4614 S MTH ST.
**a mho
•
M
N • il
41
R 0 ' c• .04
11 io• op 0" it, • -
...
! : 1
4 ./. --7. 1 ... ?A
0,0. t.
' 01_00
:—..— 1 . 0 001
1$:;:...
:•..d ,. . 0 01
l&_1 70 . VS
..
pus. •ve.)
.........
I • •
149TH $Y'
•
41. is.17
• • I
ID.
. 2 0°C300. 4
14
7i: • V Hp,
'' • .. ft A./ 2._, : 14 .4,$* ..
: .? p.
.. , ..,, . 03•. 9,4 .- it k 1•• •,,. .0
.. .
I ee' i 4 0,ot
1400 (...,./,4,, ,5„., .' -36'3,Trill274Tr.
.00tm 17s 1110. 1.5.c '' arrt "3
.4. •
LOT 2 :1.'ll''' 1-74.:17 44441 tP.
i, , .., • ,,,, ,,,,,_,,,....-, :„..,
N "\09.101 T7 ; .•.:
11;\1c19 ' 0' 6, ■1.1.1411 c, 4
2
1 ,11')
. , ::. 1 LOT 9 '
f
ie
ie .......v '
, e . ..... 1
„Y. .% s, 3,--.. ,
.9 ■ • 'A '
gmloo
noo .c,0140°'
■ON'",,, A9 I g-5,!,
5B -
penst
....
S. 15IST, ST
(wr4.1:...r),E!'',1"....""ratw. fp!. 4,
rop •
/40 ,
0
1,4 14 J.
*# 0'113
0:.0. 7 4 4r,•,, • .0,0116:
;$•O'ss„
„
G
19 •
N 66 33 07 W
ILA PI
. 1 2652,79
SE 23-23-4
. - .
• .1 lqw
13.t., •
0
5' 0
dare:
ram MAP 44110 44' 94 704790, 444V40
r irh/07 •
RECEIVED
- 1996
DCRId./01UPG1I
Lq-
rot,