HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L96-0027 - SANFT ADOLPH - TREE PERMISSIONL96 -0027
SANFT, LOUIE
14440
INTERURBAN AV
S
(P96 -0056)
TREE
PERMISSION
Permit No:
Status
Project:
Address
Location:
Parcel #:
'et1and_:
Contractor:
TENANT
OWNER
L1 b- 002-7.
LAND ALTERING
PW96 -0154 Issued: 10/31/1996
ISSUED Approval Letter: 10/31/1996
SANFT CLEARING Expires: 04/7)9/1997
14440 INTERURBAN AV S St: LAND
14440 INTERURBAN AV S
336590 -1605
Watercourse:
Slopes: Y
License No . .
SANFT LOUIE
14440 INTERURBAN AV S. TUKWILA WA
SANFT BURNARD
5030 25TH AVE 5.• SEATTLE WA 98108
CONTACT LOUIE SANFT
_ ' .. _ 6120 52' AV'' S , .' SEATTLE; WA 98118
: k• k• kk*• k*• kk• kk* k**' kk***** k *k1k`•k* *k** *•k *' *•k* *•k•k *:kk k*• k* •k*k****•k*•k•k *kk**kkk•k•k*•k*
Additional Description:'
LAND CLEARING & DEBRIES REMOVAL, APPROX. 50:000 SF
SILT FENCE .WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE WESTERN
BOUNDARIE'S & TEMP CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL..
BE @';THE S END.
98108
Phone: (206)722-6824
Phone: 206 722 -6824
r3rad i na.'F i ( Yards) -,Cut .
Per ~mft;,Fee:
Plan CheokFee:
-Other:
Total , Fees.
1t
25,.
25 :Total':
15 :00- •; Account No: 1000'322.100
0.0 :; . Account No 000/345.830
Account No: 000/386.304
- ' 15 00 Valuation.
50
\:k 'Pc*** * •k :k •k •k •k k * •k k k* ** * •k •4 k •k * :'k k. * :k -* * *. * •k,* k *, * k :k k * •k..k k * •k •k * * 'k •k •k 'k •k •k 'k k •k 'k •b * :k k :k `k •Ai •k * *: * •Q •k 'k •k 'k 'k 'k *
.....
I herebv;'cer•tir-�r4 that I''hav%e'read 'and e \ar•ined' this permit and know the same
to be true,,lan,d '!,correct. °P1.1 .:prrovisi*s vt °;s1'aw' and c dinances aover•ning this
word, wi 11t be co'rp°1 ie, $ with, whether 3pec•.if'ied he•r;ein or .riot•..` ":.The granting of
this permi;tAdoe^: i'ot �uresume to give auther�i.t_y. to•_viola.t'e :or. cancel the
provisionst .o't any ..oth'e;r state or local: laws ;regula,ting')con_ truction or the
performance 'vrf work. I am authorizedf ;to'- Sian tor •and•,"obtain th;i;;,;'Land
Altering per.�Ml,t. This permit shall become null and; >'roid it the. °4'wo'•k is not
commenced wi'th'in 186,-,days--from the date of •i-ssuanca', or...:i if the, .,'Work is
suspended or 'aba:idoned.: for a. period of 180 days from the;; l a,t inspection.
THE APPLICANT ``.T-:NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR OF COMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION
OF WORK AT L 24. ,,HOUR' IN ADVANC OR AN INSPECTION-CALL 433-0179.
Signature:
***•k** *•k *•k**•
APPROVED FOR
Issued By:
_ _ Date:
** ** k* * *•k *'k.** k** k•k•k•k•k* k* **•k•k•k * * *•k•k k* ** k•k* k*•k•k•k k k* kk•k k*•k•k* k k•k
ISSUANCE: JJ's •
Aut
�. DiTify\
,ized Permit Center
Date: 4 -5\ x
Signature
• k*• kk* k• k******• k* k• k• k****• k** k• kk• k**** k***•********• k** k• kk*: k**• k:k *•k *k*•k•k*k*•k** *•k*k:kk'k:k
I hereby certify that the permit holder whose name and address appears on
this record has satisfactorily met the standards and conditions for this
project approved herein.
Final Inspection Approved By:
Inspector Signature
Date:
z
�Z
Ct
w.
JU •
UO
0.
w =.
u_
w0
2
(0 D.
=
r- al =
Z �.
Z
G
U O'
05.1/
'0
w w.
S
LL ~:
w
O~
Z.
CITY OF TUKWILA
Address: 14440 INTERURBAN AV S St: LAND Permit No: PW9G -0154
Suite:
Tenant: SANFT LOUIE
Type: PW -LA
Parcel #: 336590 -1605
Status: ISSUED
Appl ied: 06/17/1996
Issued: 10/31/1996
**•k•k•k *•k•k* * *•k** k•k k•k k* k k *=k•**•***•k* ****•k* *•k **•k•k•k k•k k**•.4*•k•k k•k ***•k•k•k•k* 4 4*•k:4•* k•k:k*•k*
Permit Conditions:
1. Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented 35
the first order of business.to:prevent sedimentation off -
site or into er, istin g..storm:,drainage.facilities.
2. THIS PERMIT IF FOR .CLEARING THAT WAS DONE PREVIOUSLY WITH
OUT THE PERMIT, AND;:FOP SITE-CLEAN-UP. MINIMAL; AMOUNT OF
GRADING. SHALL= BE =DONE TO :'LEVEL THE ::SITE.
t ac.:::,.xr�xx+✓xVau zs, ..:H."✓+2Y:N':.tre�.JN�{datie'i r»JC'.Yc11ti'h.w5;16s ai:'e?a!+i w;a.lizbhs•.•'i.r
z
w
JU•
U O'
U)• W
W
CO u_
W }Or:
J
H W
Z
H 0;
Z
WWI,
• N'
ita
=0
• 0;.
iLJ
o N;.
H 1, ■
0
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor
March 26, 1997
Mr. Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Failure to Comply with Tree Planting, Shoreline Permit and
Land Altering Requirements:
King County Tax Parcels 336590 - 1605 -0 and 336590 -160 -0
Dear Mr. Sanft:
You previously received a letter dated April 18, 1996 from Jim
Haney, then serving as City Attorney, detailing your failure to
comply with the above referenced requirements. Those matters have
yet to be resolved and this letter �is a follow up on your failure
to comply with local regulations and permit requirements.
You were previously provided a deadline for installing trees
on your property by December 6, 1996. You have failed to do so.
The City has been willing to work with you to resolve this matter
over the past ten months. You, however, have exhibited a long
history of disregard for the City Codes applicable to removal of
trees, disregard for the authority of the City with respect to
permitting conditions, and for failure to cooperate with the City
on these matters.
Be advised that you no longer have the ability to delay
planting of the required trees. You have ten (10) days from the
date of this letter to have the trees planted. If the trees are
not planted as required, rest assured that you will face legal
action initiated by the City. Included in that action will be the
City's request that fines be imposed in the amount of $100.00 per
day from December 6, 1996 and $500.00 per day from December 11,
1996 until the trees are planted, this is in addition to the
$776.28 you must pay the City to compensate it for servicing its
sewer lift stations when your unpermitted activity resulted in
downed power lines.
CC:
Very Truly Yours,
OFFICE OF-3HE CITY ATTORNEY
RECEIVE
MAR 2 6 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 4331833
%t"3ShKr`#'E..4Y%i6^Kl''f�4 i5' +Wi+.?3m yrt rat ,':@hilt ?Ur?rp ??tit emt4t` •cm -ISYy tiA:LSnR» M; . '4Sma+,'3 KO '. !!ro'mAmustBR°E�*- e5ros.,.w....
r
z
I=-
re z.
JO•
O 0
CO O:
W=
CO u_
w 0;
LL Q,.
=
w • o.
�
z�
moo.
z I-.
D p
o N;
O
w
I— • •
Lir
• z;
o z ~
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Jimerson, Associate Planner
FROM: Bob Noe, City Attorney's Office
RE: Letter to Louis Sanft (revised draft)
DATE: March 3, 1997
John - Here is a third draft of the letter tO Sanft. Please review
it and let me know if I should send it or make further revisions.
The code provides for penalties in the amount of $100.00 per day
that the violation continues for the first five days and $500.00
per day thereafter. Sanft was provided with a deadline of December
6, 1996 to plant trees. It makes sense to start calculating the
monetary penalty from that date forward.
Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development
John Jimmerson, Associate Planner
FROM: Bob Noe, City Attorney's Office
•
DATE: January 8, 1997
RE: Louie Sanft - Failure to Install Trees
Enclosed please find a draft of a letter which I intend to send to
Mr. Sanft after receiving your input and your okay to do so.
Please let me know if you have any suggested changes. Thanks.
RECEIVED
JAN 08 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433-1833
January 8, 1997
Mr. Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
Re: Failure to Comply with Tree Planting Requirements imposed as
a Condition for the Issuance of Shoreline, Land Altering and
Tree Permits: Ring County Tax Parcels 336590 - 1605 -0 and
336590 -160 -0
Dear Mr. Sanft:
You have exhibited a long history for disregarding the City Codes
applicable to removal of trees and for disregarding the authority
of the City with respect to permitting conditions. Since March,
1996 you have exhibited such disregard by choosing to ignore a stop
work order issued by the City. You have employed dilatory actions
by failing to apply for necessary permits when directed to do so by
City Planning Staff in a Notice and Order dated March 19, 1996. In
fact, it was not until after the attorney for the City sent you a
letter dated April 18, 1996 that you came to the City to discuss
the permitting requirements. Thereafter, it took you over a month
to submit your applications on May 31, 1996. Those applications
were incomplete as you had not provided mailing labels. Over a
month later, on July 8, 1996, after repeated reminders by the City
that the applications were incomplete, you provided the mailing
labels. At that time you indicated that you disagreed with the
City's assessment on the numbers of trees you had removed from the
shoreline. You were invited to produce information establishing
the number of trees you claimed were removed but chose not to
provide that information. In September, 1996 the City approved the
shoreline and tree permits. The tree permit was approved with the
condition that you submit a landscape plan for the City's approval
and that any trees required to be installed, be planted by October
31, 1996. On October 31, 1996 the trees hadn't been installed.
You submitted on that date a sketchy landscape plan for approval.
The City on November 13, 1996 approved your landscape plan with
conditions. The City extended additional time for you to plant the
required trees to December 6, 1996. If the trees were not planted
by that date, the matter was to be referred back to the City
Attorney's Office. On December 9, 1996 the trees had not been
planted. To date the trees have not been planted. You cut down
trees in the shoreline without a permit in March, 1996, ten months
ago. This matter is now before the City Attorney's Office again.
You were strongly admonished in the past for your willful disregard
of the City's authority and for your failure to comply with the
permitting requirements by letter from the attorney for the City
dated April 18, 1996. Since that time you have exhibited the same
indifference and disregard. This is abundantly evident from the
dilatory manner in which you have addressed these important
concerns. Be advised that you no longer have the ability to delay
planting of the required trees. You have ten (10) days from the
date of this letter to have the trees planted. If the trees are
not planted as required, rest assured that you will face legal
action initiated by the City.
cc: Mayor John W. Rants
John McFarland, City Administrator
Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development
John Jimmerson, Associate Planner
Very Truly Yours,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Robert F. Noe
•
D
U:,•
:O O .
O;
w
.
;r. N d
={
Z F-.
•,w
Dpi
•
,
= W' •
•
1- V
- O.
ui.Z
;U Ni
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
November 13, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE L96= 0027'
Dear Mr. Sanft:
As you know, the above referenced tree permit was issued subject to a planting plan
approved and trees installed by October 31, 1996. This deadline was not met, as the
plan was not submitted for our review until October 31st. With this letter, the deadline for
completing the planting is being extended to December 6, 1996.
The planting plan submitted is minimal, therefore its' approval is subject to the following
conditions to ensure the requirements of Chapter 18.54 are met:
1. The replacement trees shall meet current American Association of Nurseryman
standards for nursery stock (TMC 18.54.130(3)(C)(ii).
2. Planting and maintenance of required replacement trees shall be in accordance with
best management practices for landscaping which ensure the trees. Tong -term health and
survival (TMC 18.54.130(3)(C)(iii).
3. Removal of existing vegetation and changing of existing grades for planting of the
trees shall be kept to the minimum necessary to ensure the survival and well being of the
new trees. No existing trees shall be removed to install the new trees without a tree
permit unless the tree is exempt, and horizontal separation between existing and new
trees shall be sufficient to ensure continued viability of all trees.
4. No trees shall be planted below the top of the river bank. Trees may be planted on the
top of the river bank provided the slopes are not disturbed.
5. Upon completion of the planting, you must call DCD for a final inspection to ensure
these requirements have been met (TMC 18.54.180).
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
•
6. In lieu of installing the trees by the December 6th deadline, you may submit a financial
guarantee to ensure their installation. The guarantee must be in the form of a cash
deposit or assignment of account, in the amount of 150% of the cost of completing the
work. An estimate of this cost shall be provided by a professional landscaper. If you
pursue this option, the trees will have to be installed by March 31, 1997, or else the City
will claim the funds and contract to have the trees installed.
To reiterate, the deadline for installing the trees or providing a financial guarantee is
December 6, 1996. Failure to meet this deadline will result in the matter being referred
back to the City Attorney for further enforcement.
If you have questions on these matters, please call me at 431 -3663.
S
cerely,
hn
Ass
merson
late Planner
cc: City Attorney
Steve Lancaster
Gary Schulz
File
i
ocw
J U°
OO;
CO
i 0:
CO w;
J
:co LL!
w ■
a
1w
Z
0
:z
w w ;.
10 -
▪ Id
,zf .
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
September 24, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96 -0026 Shoreline Permit
L96 -0027 Tree Permit
Dear Mr. Sanft:
This is to inform you that the City of Tukwila has granted approval of the above referenced
permits.
The shoreline permit has been forwarded to the Department of Ecology for filing. Any appeals
of the shoreline permit must be made to the Shoreline Hearings Board within 21 days of the
date of filing.
The tree permit has been approved with one condition, which is enclosed. Please note the •
deadlines by which the planting plan and actual planting must be completed. The determination
of replacement trees is based upon an estimate as to the number and size of trees removed
within the shoreline zone. Enclosed is our analysis on which the estimates were based.
Since the tree permit predates adoption of Ordinance No. 1768, appeals would be heard by the
Board of Adjustment. Any appeal must be filed within 10 days of the date of this letter.
Don't hesitate to call me at 431 -3663 if you have any questions on these actions.
Sincerely,
1;»
John Ji Ierson
Associ . e Planner
enclosures: Tree Permit Conditions
tree Replacement Analysis
Shoreline Permit
•
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
CITY OF TUK,WILA
Address: 14440 INTERURBAN AV S
Suite:
Tenant: SANFT ADOLPH
Type: P -TREE
Parcel *: 336590 -1605
Permit No: L96 -002.7
Status: APPROVED
Applied: 05/31/1996
Issued: 09/23/1996
******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Permit Conditions:
1. Fifty four (54) replacement trees are required pursuant to
TMC 18.54.130. These trees :..shall .,.be, planted no later than
October 31, 1996. Pri,or;: to planting, the .applicant shall
submit a planting,. plan;to" DCD which shows:.the::.,,location,
species and size of the trees. Deciduous tree,s,sha 1 1 have a
minimum eat iperof 2,.5, inches: Coniferous; trees shall have
a minimum he,,ighit of6 8.:feet.
,t. •
J o',
00:
N 0.
iA W;
J3
w 0,
4a
u.
cog
= w'.
r-=,
? F->
z 0
w uj:
gip`
i0 —1
0
,S V
0
Zi
Z
City of Tukwila
,C*4e
016 -lo3
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor
March 19, 1996
Mr. Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98118
Certified Mail No. P 112 198 021
NOTICE AND ORDER
Subject: Muncipal Code Violations on Parcels: 336590- 1605 -0 and 336590- 1630 -0.
z
z
00:
co w;
w s:
•
w0
J;
u.
—d.
Dear Mr. Sanft;
You are hereby notified that your recent tree and vegetation removal activities on King
County Tax Parcel No. 336590- 1605 -0 and 336590- 1630 -0, situated in Block 16, z
Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, is in violation of the following sections of the Tukwila
Municipal Code: v N-
• CO
0 I-.
Uy
U.
El
Z:
0 ;
You are hereby instructed upon receipt of this Notice and Order to apply for all required 0
permits and approvals necessary under the above - referenced sections of the Tukwila :z
Municipal Code and any State of Washington approvals embodied in said sections; to
include any remediation measures required as a result of activity already undertaken at the
referenced site.
16.54 Land Altering
18.44 Shoreline Overlay Zone (Subsection of Title 18 "Zoning Code ")
18.54 Tree Regulations (Subsection of Title 18 "Zoning Code ")
Your failure to respond as directed in this Notice and Order within fifteen (15) days of
receipt, shall constitute a Civil Violation and shall be subject to enforcement as provided in
Section 8.45 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
Should you wish to appeal this Notice and Order you must do so by filing an appeal, in
writing, with the Tukwila City Clerk's Office within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice.
Such appeal shall be made to the Hearing Officer and shall be in the form provided in
Section 8.45.060 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
Signed:
Ross Earnst,
Director of Public Works
Steve Lancaster
Director of Community Development
Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833
'" MItffeNcr:-,NISyllrrs ra? vzmttAMV.;I :•,fists -m r,*"rroxew.
�y�
Date: 29- Jan -97 14:06:34
From: JOHN -J (JOHN JIMERE . )
To: JASON
Copies -to: STEVE
Subject: Sanft Action RFA 96 -103
Message -id: 6A59EF3201000000
Application -name: MHS
Jason - DCD has issued shoreline and tree permits for the project, however, Mr. Sanft has yet to
comply with the requirements of the tree permit. Public Works has issued a land altering permit.
Given the applicant's lack of response to the permit conditions, the matter has been referred again
to the City Attorney for additional enforcement action. I will update you when the status changes.
In the meantime, if you need any additional info, don't hesitate to ask... john
Sanft Chronology 12 -23 -96
January 1996 (estimated date) - Sanft came to counter and asked . if he needed a
permit to removed trees along Maule Ave. • He was told as long as he was out of
the shoreline zone he was exempt as long as the trees were not in the Maule
Ave ROW.
March 2, 1996 - Sanft observed cutting down trees in shoreline zone.
z
F w.
Ce
J U.
March 4, 1996 - City staff inspected site and determined shoreline, tree and LAO o
co
permits were needed. Sanft was informed at site and indicated he would w =
comply. N
•
March 19, 1996 - Letter sent by Earnst and Lancaster indicating the violation and g
�
''requiring an application be provided within 15 days of receipt of certified letter. N
► zd
r6Y April 18, 1996 - Letter sent by Jim Haney providing notice of violation and Z
A- penalties. Deadline of April 29, 1996 to submit permit applications. o
z
April 22, 1996 - Sanft comes to counter to discuss permit requirements. n o'
o w;
May 31, 1996 - Sanft submits applications for tree, land altering and shoreline /� w ~
and SEPA checklist. - Incomplete - lacked mailing labels. o
June 16, 1996 - Letter sent reminding Sanft of incomplete application. ,ii z
o
July 8, 1996 - Second letter (and phone call) reminding Sanft of incomplete - o
.., z
application.
July 9, 1996 - Sanft brings in mailing labels. We discussed the number of trees
removed from Shoreline - we had a disagreement on the number - I told him 1
. would consider any evidence he could provide - invoices, photos, etc., but based
on the evidence to date I felt there were more trees removed than he identified
that were removed
July 15, 1996 - Letter sent to Sanft indicating we will review any documentation
he provides regarding number of trees. I gave him a deadline of July 31, 1996.
(No additional evidence was provided.)
6,zp(Lc f1.6 fie COIN, s 71 np- !v •. _ _
September 24, 1996 - City approves Shoreline Permit and Tree Permit. Tree
permit approved with condition that applicant submit landscape plan for city
approval and have trees installed by October 31st.
Sept.. 27, 1996 - Sanft called about his permit - are there any other permits? Can
he cut down the cottonwood? Can he defer planting to raise money for trees? I
reminded him of LAO permit and offered to callback on other questions.
October :1, 1996 -Phone mst. for Sanft stating the cottonwood may be removed
but must: comply w /PW LAO: Also stated replacement trees may be deferred if
financial guarantee (150% of installation costs) is provided.
:October 31, 1996 - Sanft submits sketchy landscape plan for approval.
November 13, 1996 - Letter approving landscape subject to conditions mailed.
Planting to be completed by Dec. 6, 1996 or refer back to City Attorney. No
• response to that letter of approval was received.
Dec. 9, 1996 - Sanft hadn't planted trees. Called and left a voice mail for him.
No response to that call was received.
December 19, 1996 - l left voice mail for Sanft indicating he hadn't complied with
the requirements nor returned my earlier call and that I wanted to talk to him
before referring the file back to the City Attorney.
December 19 or 20, 1996 - Sanft left voice mail indicating he was out of town,
but is working on getting the planting done. Unable to do it because it has been
wet
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Noe, City Attorney's Office
FROM: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director
DATE: January 10, 1997
RE: Draft Letter.to Louie Sanft
I have reviewed the above referenced letter and offer the following suggestions.
Keep the letter to one page, if possible. Organize into three brief paragraphs:
• Purpose of letter is to follow up on his failure to comply with local regulations
and permit requirements, most recently being the deadline for installing
trees by December 6, 1996.
• Comment that the City has been willing to work with him to achieve
compliance, but it's been 10 months since the infraction originally incurred
and there has been . a distinct pattern' of his failure to cooperate with the
application process and to meet deadlines. The specifics have been •
documented and do not need to be repeated here.
• . Provide one final deadline, specifying the City's actions if he fails to comply -
additional fines? Perhaps a reminder of the fines that have been accrued $o
date should be provided. It is not clear how much he has accrued in fines.
Jim Haney idenified a particular amount. How much more has accrued since
then?
Thanks for the opportunity to review the letter. I would like to review the second
draft before it goes out.
SL:JJ
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
.z
•
• . zH
.mow.
fin:
0o�
co w.
• W =:
H,
N
w o:
J�
a. <C.
I— is
1• o •
• z�-:
ww
w z:
z~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Noe, City Attorney's Office
FROM: Steve Lancas CD Director
DATE: January 10, 199 C;/
RE: Draft Letter to Louie Sanft
I have reviewed the above referenced letter and offer the following suggestions.
Keep the letter to one page, if possible. Organize into three brief paragraphs:
• Purpose of letter is to follow up on his failure to comply with local regulations
and permit requirements, most recently being the deadline of December 6,
1996, in which the trees were to have been installed.
Comment that the City has been willing to work with him to achieve
compliance, but it's been 10 months since the infraction originally incurred
and there has been a distinct pattern of his failure to cooperate and meeting
deadlines. The specifics have been documented and do not need to be
repeated here.
Provide one final deadline, specifying what the City will do to follow up with
enforcement - additional fines? Perhaps a reminder of the fines that have
been accrued to date should be provided. It is not clear how many days for
which Mr. Sanft is subject to the fines identified by Jim Haney. Is he accruing
fines now for not meeting the 12/6/96 deadline?
Thanks for the opportunity to review the letter. I would like to review the second
draft before it goes out.
SL:JJ
:4:oULAW4..:•.v:e..t.<........a Ao..w.•.
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development
John Jimmerson, Associate Planner ✓
FROM: Bob Noe, City Attorney's Office-;Z,.=
DATE: January 8, 1997
RE: Louie Sanft - Failure to Install Trees
Enclosed please find a draft of a letter which I intend to send to
Mr. Sanft after receiving. your input and your okay to do so.
Please let me know if you have any suggested changes. Thanks.
RECEIVED
JAN 08 1997
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax: (206) 433.1833
F:
D
•o o` •
cnw
W =-
•
W o'
J:
. u_ QC
W
Z H;
Z 0'i
w W�
•
oN, w w'
•
- o
zr
Z•
f
City of Tukwila
IS its c: ? lF
3-0 A.t4E
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, M
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development
FROM: Bob Noe, City Attorney's Office'cj
RE: Letter to Louis Sanft
DATE: February 19, 1997
Steve, I apologize for getting the second draft of this letter back
to you so late. Please let me know if this draft iS acceptable to
mail. Thanks.
BECEIV ED
EB 1 9 1997
COMMUNVTV
DENELOPUteNT
Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833
• !'f
February 19, 1997
Mr. Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Re: Failure to Comply with Tree Planting Requirements:
King County Tax Parcels 336590 - 1605 -0 and 336590 -160 -0
Dear Mr. Sanft:
The purpose of this letter is to follow up on your failure to
comply with local regulations and permit requirements. You were
previously provided a deadline for installing trees on your
property by December 6, 1996. You have failed to do so.
The City has been willing to work with you to resolve this
matter over the past ten months. You, however, have exhibited a
long history of disregard for the City Codes applicable to removal
of trees, disregard for the authority of the City with respect to
permitting conditions, and failure to cooperate with the City on
these matters.
Be advised that you no longer have the ability to delay
planting of the required trees. You have ten (10) days from the
date of this letter to have the trees planted. If the trees are
not planted as required, rest assured that you will face legal
action initiated by the City. Included in that action will be the
City's request that fines be imposed in the amount of $100.00 per
day from April 6, 1996 and 1500.00 per day from April 21, 1996
until the trees are planted, his is in addition to the $776.28 you
must pay the City to compensate it for servicing its sewer lift
stations when your unpermitted activity resulted in downed power
lines.
Very Truly Yours,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Robert F. Noe
cc: Mayor John W. Rants
John McFarland, City Administrator
Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development
John Jimmerson, Associate Plannerl
z
z
W
.0 O•
W W:
J
_:
NLL'
w O;
J
u.¢
1--W:
I- o
• Z
U 0;
,= w'
— O:
z;
U —1
O►"
Z
Q 1-
=
F- Z W
-JU
O 0
U 0
U) W
UJ_
F-
U) W
WO
Q
L Q
u0
=a
f- W
Z=
I-
t-- 0
Z F-
W
D• 0
U
O -
O F-
Ww
F- H
u. O
W
.. Z
U=
O
Z
Z
< •
2 F-
L— Z
Ce 2W
_i 0
O 0
(1) 0
U) W
ill 1
_i L-
W Li.
w 0
ce =I
u_ a
-I a
I— -1
mil
Z 1—
I-0
Z I-
LL1 Lii
2 D
D CI
C.) co
0
C1 I—
W Lij
2
I— p-
/I= 0
Z
LLi
0 U)
F. 1
0 I-
z
Z
H W
cc D
J0
O 0
U)o
CO III
J =
• u_
w 0
L Q
=• 0
Iw
Z =
F-
I- 0
Zt-
w Lij
O 0
O -
OH
ww
2
H -
�O
.
w Z
O co
—
F--=
O ~
Z
Z
W
J U
00
UO
vow
W
H
w0
w
=d
1—w
Z =
F-
1— 0
Z1—
w IA
Uu)
O • 1--
Ww
_
Li- O
w..
�
F-
O ~
z
(4144)'
TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Doug Micheau
FROM: Steve Lancaste
SUBJECT: Sanft property code violations
DATE: March 11, 1996
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
Attached is Gary Shulz's memo regarding tree ordinance violations at the Sanft property. Please
be aware that the work done almost certainly also violates the City's and the State's shoreline
management regulations (assuming that work valued at more than $2,500 occurred).
•
Addressing these violations will require that the owner submit applications for a tree permit, and
a shoreline substantial development permit. A SEPA checklist will also be required. For your
information, the shoreline permit will be subject to review by WSDOE, and any appeals of the
shoreline permit, once issued, would go before the State Shoreline Hearings Board.
cc: Gary Schulz
1:011115iffiqrso,P
Jack Pace
SANFT.DOC
MEMORANDUM
TO: Doug Micheau, Public Works Coordinator
Steve Lancaster, Community Development Director
FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist - DCD
DATE: March 5, 1996
RE: Sanft Property Code Violations.
The following information on the subject clearing activities is separated into two sections, on -site
observations and zoning code regulation and permit requirements. I am not as familiar with the
Civil Violations section (TMC 8.45) but it is referenced in the Tree Regulations and may be used
for this situation.
On -site Observations
On Saturday, 3/2/96, City staff from the sewer /surface water section of Public Works left a
message on my home telephone concerning tree removal east of Interurban Avenue and south of
S. 144th Street along Maule Street. I didn't get home in time to help but the message indicated
that significant clearing was in progress and a tree had fallen and interrupted electric power in
the area. I wasn't sure of the property's actual location.
On Monday morning at the office I learned that John Jimmerson, Planner, had previously spoke
with the owner of the property. Because the site is adjacent to the Duwamish River, there was
a question about the tree removal being in the shoreline zone. I asked John to visit the site with
me and we would measure the 200 -foot shoreline zone.
When we arrived at the site a remaining clump of trees was being cut in the northwest corner of
the property. Most of the site had been cleared and surface graded. Soil and garbage debris were
exposed. Wood debris and small limbs with green vegetation were scattered throughout the site.
However, the only stumps visible was the clump of big leaf maple trees in the 'northwest. corner.
After measuring the 200 -foot Shoreline Zone from close to the Ordinary High Water Mark, it was
apparent that these stumps were inside the Shoreline. Most of the remaining trees being cut were
greater than 200 feet from the river, outside of the Shoreline. John took a few pictures to
document the tree cutting.
John and I spoke with Gene Bonomi of Gene's Hauling & Excavating, 228 -4621. He was
working on the site last weekend and reported there were many trees inside the 200 -foot
Shoreline Zone. He explained the incident where one of the trees broke off and fell across the
z
s i_W.
• 6D.
• JU.
0 C
coo:
Wr
J I-,
N LL'
W o:
• t_w
_.
z
z F-
� o;
411-i
ALI UM
.1-
U.
• I-- ~'
z
Sanft Memo
March 5, 1996
Page 2
power line just west of the subject property. Before we left Lou Sanft (owner's son ?) arrived
to talk with us. We informed him that a tree permit was necessary for the trees removed in the
Shoreline Zone. Also, we told him to contact Public Works because they regulate land altering
of areas exceeding 6,000 square feet. Mr. Sanft said he would work with the City to mitigate
the situation. This was the first time I had met or talked with Mr. Sanft.
Zoning Code Regulations / Permit Requirements
The current Tree Regulations Ordinance (TMC 18.54) requires a Tree Permit for tree removal
occurring within a sensitive area, sensitive area buffer, or shoreline zone as stated in TMC
18.54.050. As defined, regulated trees are those greater than 4 inches in diameter measured 5
feet above grade, "Significant Tree" TMC 18.54.770. The definition excludes Cottonwood trees.
In addition to the work requirements of applicant insurance (TMC 18.54.110) and protection of
property (TMC 18.54.160 c.), a security can be required to mitigate damages should they occur
as a result of clearing which is not authorized' by a Tree Permit (TMC 18.54.120).
The Enforcement section (TMC 18.54.180) of the ordinance refers to TMC 8.45, Civil Violations
for helping to remedy a violation. The Enforcement section also allows the DCD Director to post
a "Stop Work Order" directing that all vegetation clearing not authorized under a Tree Permit
cease immediately. The Remedial Measures subsection (d) states the actions necessary to mitigate
the impacts of clearing must be completed within 6 months or within the time period otherwise
specified by the Director.
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor-
March 19, 1996
Mr. Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98118
Certified Mail No. P 112 198 021
NOTICE AND ORDER
Subject: Muncipal Code Violations on Parcels: 336590- 1605 -0 and 336590- 1630 -0.
Dear Mr. Sanft;
You are hereby notified that your recent tree and vegetation removal activities on King
County Tax Parcel No. 336590- 1605 -0 and 336590- 1630 -0, situated in Block 16,
Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, is in violation of the following sections of the Tukwila
Municipal Code:
16.54 Land Altering
18.44 Shoreline Overlay Zone (Subsection of Title 18 "Zoning Code ")
18.54 Tree Regulations (Subsection of Title 18 "Zoning Code ")
You are hereby instructed upon receipt of this Notice and Order to apply for all required
permits and approvals necessary under the above - referenced sections of the Tukwila
Municipal Code and any State of Washington approvals embodied in said sections; to
include any remediation measures required as a result of activity already undertaken at the
referenced site.
Your failure to respond as directed in this Notice and Order within fifteen (15) days of
receipt, shall constitute a Civil Violation and shall be subject to enforcement as provided in
Section 8.45 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
Should you wish to appeal this Notice and Order you must do so by filing an appeal, in
writing, with the Tukwila City Clerk's Office within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice.
Such appeal shall be made to the Hearing Officer and shall be in the forth provided in
Section 8.45.060 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
Signed:
Ross Earnst,
Director of Public Works
Steve Lancaster
Director of Community Development
MAR 1 9 1996
ComrouNIIY
nr.vpi npuipt\ri.
Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833
z
•
�w
re • 00
(i) o.
W ='
J H-
CO LL,
•
w 0:
g Q;
�w
z�
i- O
z F-;
• LLID.
U ra.
.O —;
2 U,
0:
.0 y`
z
OVERLAP SEC. 14
.tea
/770
L.,
U
C7 �' �,
� LEI (�1[
--x 144TH
• /7.5 :•`:
•
Ey4
l�� rt
7 5\ )\f� I�
x
20.4\
20.5\
■
( \ \14%P**-k4k I i t I\
\ V.,4Nit\
1 31
( 4
X 22
x
/84.5
/835
x
/82.0
x
r c.7
L
x
184.5
wi
2
x /75
x /8.0
Cultivated
/60
x
x
/5.5
22.5
x
Cultivated
x21.5
22.5 \`‘\
\ \ \
e13 a45gr� ,11.0w=
22.5
x
z
W
re 00
J
w
N LL
W O.
LL <
W
Z
I— 0
zrr,
Lu
W
O • N.
O H
W W`
u_ 6
W..
v ='
0
z
DEN
AI,�LACE
REcElvED
APR 19 1996
P.L.L.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW COMML1NI,dY
...t...0t -MEN!
2100 Westlake Center Tower • 1601 Fifth Avenue • Seattle, WA 98101 -1686 • (206) 447 -7000 • Fax (206) 447 -0215
James E. Haney
Via Certified and Regular Mail
April 18, 1996
Mr. Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98118
Re: Violations of Tukwila Municipal Code on King County Tax
Parcels 336590- 1605 -0 and 336590- 1630 -0
Dear Mr. Sanft:
I represent the City of Tukwila. On March 21, 1996, you received
a Notice and Order from Ross Earnst and Steve Lancaster, the
Tukwila Director of Public Works and Director of Community
Development, respectively, informing you of numerous violations of
the Tukwila Municipal Code relating to your recent tree and
vegetation removal activities on the above - referenced properties.
A copy of that Notice and Order is enclosed. Because you have not
responded to the direction given in that Notice and Order, I have
been retained by the City to take appropriate action to secure your
compliance.
Your recent activities on the above - referenced parcels violate the
Tukwila Municipal Code in several respects. First, you failed to
obtain a permit under the Land Altering Regulations, Chapter 16.54
of the Tukwila Municipal Code, before commencing any work. Second,
you have removed vegetation within an area protected by the City's
Shoreline Overlay Zone Regulations, Chapter 18.44 of the Tukwila
Municipal Code. Finally, you removed significant trees and
understory vegetation without a permit in violation of the City's
Tree Regulations, Chapter 18.54 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
These violations are serious and must be corrected by you
immediately.
In order to cure these Code violations, you must do the following
things. First, you must immediately apply for and obtain all
required permits and approvals necessary under the above - referenced
sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code and any approvals from the
State of Washington which are required by those Tukwila Municipal
Code sections. Second, those permit applications must contain, and
when the permits are issued you must accomplish, remediation
measures in order to restore those portions of your properties
which are in violation of the Code to an appropriate state. Third,
you must pay the civil penalties set forth in the Tukwila Municipal
Code, which are One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per day for the first
five (5) days of violation (beginning on April 6, fifteen (15) days
after you received the Notice and Order) and Five Hundred Dollars
($500.00) per day for each day that of violation after that.
careAts $4.140,4 .1116,
Wenatchee Office • One South Chelan Street • P.O. Box 1606 • Wenatchee, WA 98807 • (509) 662 -1954 • Fax (509) 663 -1553
• "j"=?M"i'.,— ttr"' ", —•••s• TcMrl2Y.sMri^ carts.• r'.¢` 4` .".n.(1t1t4�tre;M.•r;�.�:iY.e.v p�tln!!R`. n.*aYn'µY7."= '.1'X.T�R - ! . Tt`^ .._
z
1Y6
6D.
•J 0
0 0.
• (0 0;
J =.
w0.
u_a
Sd
w
I- O`
• w ~•
w
O C:
0 I-
• w
1-R
u" O.
o
,•z
O
z
Mr. Louie Sanft
April 18, 1996
Page 2
Finally, you must compensate the City for its costs for servicing
its sewage lift stations whose power was interrupted when your
activities knocked down power lines, in the amount of $776.28.
You are hereby notified that unless you apply for all required
permits immediately and make all necessary payments within ten (10)
days from the date of this letter, the City is prepared to take all
necessary legal actions, up to and including the filing of a
lawsuit, to force you into compliance.
Please understand that the City does not undertake these actions
lightly. We cannot, however, continue to allow you to violate the
City's Codes within impunity. When you were originally ordered to
stop work on March 5, 1996, you did so only for as long as it took
the inspectors to leave the site and then recommenced working in
violation of the stop work order. When you were given the Notice
and Order, you initially inquired about permits, but have taken no
steps to file any applications. This indifference to the problem
and willful disregard of the City's authority has left the City
with no choice but to turn the matter over to me for action. The
choice is now yours. Either take the steps outlined above within
ten (10) days from the date of this letter or face the legal
consequences. I am sure you will make the reasonable choice and
bring yourself into compliance.
By copy of this letter, I am notifying the appropriate City
personnel of the deadline I have given you. I will check with them
on April 29, 1996 in order to see whether you have taken the
requested actions. If so, then the matter will be closed from my
standpoint. If not, then you can expect further legal action by
me.
Very truly yours,
OG EN NI RPHY LACE, P.L.L.C.
ames E.
JEH /bjs
Enclosure
cc: Mayor John W. Rants
Mr. John McFarland
Mr. Ross Earnst
Mr. Steve Lancaster
Mr. Doug Micheau
Mr. Ron Cameron
Mr. Gary Schulz ..
Mr.. John Jimerson
JEH 130003.1 LF00051.150.001 /B00051.
MAR_047 ?6.r;1QN 10:52 AM A &B PROPERTIES
FAX TRANSMISSION
TO : John Jimerson, AICP
Associate Planner
Dept. of Community Development
City of Tukwila
Ph #431 -3663
Fx #431 -3665
FROM : Louie Sanft
Ph #722 -6824
Fx #722 -0518
2067220518
DATE : 3/4/96
NOTE : John,
Here is a drawing of the proposed site location of the trees to be
removed. There is approximately 10 -12 trees remaining to be removed. I
would like to see if the contractor can complete this job as soon as possible
so that I don't have to hire them to return at a later date.
I will be calling you soon,
Thanks for your time,
Lou' Sanft.
SA4.-
P.01
1-z
,
o O;
10
w i;
w 0
u.¢;
=0';
w.
F- 0'
U
o
MAR -04 -96 MON 10:52 AM A &B PROPERTIES 2067220518
. �.
■
. (ALP ;NZ `( H16 t VVA.Tt''*)
P. 02
6x isT A36)
4T Dev6torrn6NT
OmILDlIv6)
rt3n.6+ali�egi Y'a�::1W'
�mY" Lt4r r: J«!L:43vad<?bL,r2f�? "aKi(,^ .�i�g.V.?1,i4? ,,,,?cc1S344 "..:.,.
Z
:rQQ W' •
•
.0 0';
ai
W W
.,N LL{
W O; •
u.
1- _'.
Z F":
W W'
D1
• O
• ~
ll.O
z
Z
W
2.
6
J0
0O
co
w=
u_
W 9
g a.
z v.
�
2
I- O
Z
11J uj.
2• p
:O• a
0
W W.
H 0,
LI- Z.
L
U _co
- x.
O
Z
MEMORANDUM
TO: Doug Micheau
FROM: John Jimerson
DATE: March 5, 1996
RE: Louie Sanft Violation
Here is a chronology of events with my involvement with the Sanft
land clearing issue:
January 1996 (Estimated Date) : Louie Sanft came to the counter
asking if he needed a tree permit to remove trees along Maule Ave.,
next to the GT Development property. He said some of the trees
were a hazard and he was concerned they may fall on the buildings
on the adjacent lot (GT ?).
He asked if a tree permit was necessary. The sensitive areas map
did not indicate any slopes or wetlands, so I told him as long as
the trees were out of the shoreline zone - 200' from high water
mark - that no tree permit was necessary. I believe I also told
him that if any trees were in the right -of -way (Maule), he would
need permission from Public Works to cut them down.
This conversation was based on generalities. In no way did I tell
him that he was exempt from permits. I only gave him the parameters
for when a permit is or is not required. We did not have a map
showing location of the trees he was speaking of.
March 4, 1996: Louie called me first thing in the morning, saying
that his contractor had been told by the City to stop cutting. He
was surprised because I had told him no permit was required when he
came in in January. He reiterated the need to cut down the trees
as they may fall on the adjacent building. When I asked who from
the City told him to stop work and why, he did not know. Later he
called and said it was John Howat, but he did not know the reason.
I called, John. Since he was out I spoke to Ted Freemire. Ted said
John had told them to stop because they may be violating Planning
regulations.
I called Louie again. He said he had several trees still to be
cut, and since the contractor's equipment was on the site now, he
wanted to finish the job. He asked me for the a go -ahead to finish
the job. I asked him to submit a plan showing the location of the
W
re 2
6
-.I C.)
UO
CO Li.
,WW
J.
w OI
LL Q
Cam:
= d:
1. w
Z
1- O
O N;
= W..
-O
z,
og
O ~''.
z
trees that he wanted to remove and the location of the high water
mark.
After receiving his fax, I drove to the site to discover that the
site had been disturbed much more that I had understood. Rather
than removal of a few trees, it appeared as though the entire site
had been cleared of vegetation. The entire site, save a cluster of
trees at the northwest corner and a line of trees and shrubs along
the top of the river bank and one lone black cottonwood had been
cleared.
Louie came into the office for an answer. I indicated that based
on my site visit I thought trees had been removed within 200' of
the shoreline and that he needed to submit a tree permit
application. I reviewed the application requirements and gave him
a copy of the replacement tree schedule.
I reviewed the situation with Jack Pace and we agreed that since
the remaining trees were further than 200' from the shoreline, that
they were not subject to a tree permit and that we would authorize
removal. We also agreed that a tree permit for the trees already
removed in the shoreline zone would be necessary.
I contacted Louie at some point and told him that he could remove
any tree beyond 200 feet. The plan he submitted showed all but the
Black Cottonwood as being further than 200 feet from the shoreline.
Later that afternoon, Gary Schulz and I visited the site (about
2:30). We measured the distance to trees that were in process of
being cut. A cluster of about 4 trees that was significantly cut
before we arrived (apparantly on Saturday) measured about 175' from
the high water mark. Two poplars beyond were about the 200' mark.
There were several poplars even further away.
We talked with Louie Sanft and told him (again) that he may cut
down the trees beyond the 200 foot line and added that the black
cottonwood in the middle of the site is also exempt, but that he
would have to apply for a tree permit for the non - exempt trees that
had already been removed. On plans he would need to show the 200'
line and the location and estimated size of any trees that were
removed. We would exempt one of the trees as hazardous that he and
the hauling contractor said was rotted in the center.
We told him that the work requires a land clearing permit from
Public Works as it exceeded 6,000 sq. ft. and suggested he talk to
PW.
Louie agreed that he would submit a tree permit application and
that he understood replacement trees would have to be provided.
March 5, 1996
After Public Works told the crew to stop work today, Steve
Lancaster and I discussed the matter with Doug Micheau and came to
a common understanding that that the trees that were further than
200' from the shoreline were not subject to a tree permit. I
called Louie and told him that they could be removed. Regarding
the Black Cottonwood, I said it was exempt from the tree permit
process, but that he should talk to Public Works, specifically
Doug, to find out if it was subject to the land altering permit.
v
oi� (zr , k (k,d c c ,__v I o hi _0( /M A e_
41411 (9 4"e et 6 Zd- cc w(the,
r odd, ,rr e tv, &( f �u r
d'ey (e(// F our 4 kl c' C,(vr
c91" (1`41 ( 5 5' Ire " d(C4i-4 Pec7 ( fiK Cd- 41L--
vv,R 12,e caco.e_ 1+ /
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
March 4, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Ave S
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: Tree Permit Requirements
Dear Mr. Sanft:
frid 9meie f5((5
C54 .
This is to summarize our conversations of today. As I indicated to
you, based on our records and the site plan you submitted, the
trees located at the NW corner of your property on Maule Avenue
(north of GT development) are more than 200' from the shoreline and
therefore may be removed without a tree permit. This does not
include the remaining maple of the cluster that was largely removed
on Saturday, nor does it include the two poplars that were removed
earlier today.
Based on aerial photographs and our discussions, it is clear that
there have been several significant trees located within 200 feet
of the shoreline that have been removed. You will need to submit
a tree permit application, the $25 fee, and a site plan which
identifies location, size and species of trees with diameter of 4"
or greater that were removed. The site plan needs to also provide
location, species and size of the replacement trees to be planted,
the number of which is based on the replacement schedule I gave you
this morning.
The hazardous tree should also be identified on the site plan and
labeled as such. Because it would have been exempt from a tree
permit as a hazard, we will not require that replacement trees be
provided for it.
Finally, in talking with Greg Villanueva, the Public Works
Utilities inspector, who I understand you met on the site Saturday,
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
he indicated that the project is subject to a clearing permit. I
would suggest you contact Public Works at 433 -0179 as soon as
possible to comply with their permitting requirements.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call me at 431 -3663.
Sincerely,
John Jimerson
Associate Planner
cc: Gary Schulz
Greg Villanueva
JU
U. O
'n0.
;CO w;.
W =,
;J H:
'w
= d'
F- W
.
w
•2 of
•i0
W
I W
I-- V?
if
z
rt.
July 15, 1996
City of Tukvvila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96 -0026 & L96 -0027
Dear Mr. Sanft:
This is to follow up on your visit to our office on July 9, 1996. At that time we discussed
the reason for using the "canopy coverage" method for determining tree replacement
requirements on your permit. This method is to be used because we do not have
accurate information as to the number, size and species of trees that were removed from
the shoreline zone.
•
As I mentioned to you, Gary SchUl, the City's Urban Environmentalist, estimates there
were fifteen trees removed from 'the shoreline zone. But as you know, the aerial
photographs he used were dated fr.`om 1986 and they did not allow him to clearly identify
the species and size of the trees.
You seemed to question the accuracy of this estimate. f hope I made it clear to you that it
was just an estimate, and that we don't have better information to confirm nor deny that
estimate. Again, because of this dearth of information, it is appropriate to apply the
canopy method.
I conveyed to you that we will review any additional information you provide that may help
us accurately determine the number, size and species of trees removed from the
shoreline zone. If this information can be provided and we are satisfied of its
accuracy, then we will be able to use the tree replacement table rather than the canopy
method.
At the completion of our discussion at the counter last week you indicated that you will
look for new information, including the possibility of obtaining more recent aerial
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 4313665
-z
r4 2
-10
0O
co cv
co w.
w =..
wLL
w0
u_ j.
x w.
I- _.
z
� o
z I,
w w!
Do
o =
.0.�r
wWt
H U
LL o?
z?
Utnj
o
�
z.
photographs from Walker and Associates, to accurately identify the trees that were
removed. Please be advised that if you are going to provide additional information you
should do so by July 31, 1996, or sooner if possible. If you do not provide any -
information by that date, we will continue to process the applications based on using the
canopy coverage method.
If you have questions on these matters, please call me at 431 -3663.
erson
to Planner
..,.o-. ............ ..i�L "u:Li• "." - c:i75iut,ili:+it: (CG,nin ;w ..i;., tea. •..'441123:Ya
z..
w.
t DI
J U
01
'' .u)Wl
W =:
N V? •
:.•
mow:.
moo;.
;z I;
•
;0:1-;
= VC.
Oi
:U.' CO;
�2
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
TRANSMITTED BY FAX
July 8, 1996
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96 -0026 &196- 0027''
Dear Mr. Sanft:
This is to follow up on my letter of three weeks ago in which I reminded you the above
referenced applications have been found to be incomplete.
New regulations become effective on July 10, 1996 which will affect those applications if
you do not complete them before that date. The changes would result in a requirement
that you provide mailing labels for residents and owners within 500 feet of the site
(currently it is 300 feet), provide a 4' x 4' board with a notice of application on the site, and
could require additional plans and information to be submitted ,to meet the standards for a
complete application.
If you do not meet this deadline, you will need to obtain new application forms from the
City which identify the information necessary for a complete application.
If you have questions on these matters, please call me at 431 -3663.
Si cerely,
4!
ohn Jerson
Assoc ate Planner
cc: City Attorney
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665
LFi' ^1..v.'1 „=,.
z
ice.
Wiz.
�W.
6
0o
CD CI
WW;.
W I:
J H
N
W Of
LL a
co d
I- W;
z�;.
z 1-
11.1 uj
p;
O • -'
0 H;
W W;
H t-
• 1-
U
.z
,z
•
•
City ®f TukvWila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Louie Sanft
6120 52nd Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98118
RE: L96 -0026 & L96 -0027'
Dear Mr. Sanft:
As you recall, two weeks ago when you submitted your application
for a shoreline permit, I accepted the application but explained
that you need.., to provide public notice mailing labels for a
complete application. This is a reminder that you need to provide
the mailing ,labels for property owners and tenants within a 300
foot radius and the assessors maps showing those properties. Until
we receive the labels and map(s) your application is deemed to be
incomplete and will not be processed.
Regarding your tree permit application, Gary Schulz, Urban
Environmentalist, reviewed aerial photographs and estimates there
were roughly 15 trees removed from the shoreline zone, which is
significantly higher than the 3 trees you've noted on your plan.
Give this discrepancy and that we cannot precisely identify after
the fact the number, size, and species of the trees removed, DCD
has determined the tree canopy cover approach is appropriate to
determine the number of replacement trees required (TMC
18.54.140 (b) .
This approach requires that you provide a minimum canopy cover of
20' of the site. Each tree planted is considered to cover 314
square feet. (Thus, site area in square feet x .2/314 = number' of
trees required).
In order to complete your tree permit application, we need you to
provide the site area in square feet within the shoreline zone,
plug it into the formula above, and provide a planting plan showing
the size, location and species of the required number of trees.
If you have questions on these matters, please call me at 431 -3663.
Si. erely
lir
J" 'n Ji -rson
ssoci -te Planner
t
cc: C'ty Attorney
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
mc�!!w:xewsen»rw.eat wnvKS4147: mer VM.4,1 n,.o.- en.w...-.. .,..,..wT.n.e- ,.....«,,.... .....r........,_......,.
z�
~w:
W2,
J U;
O 0:
C
CAW:
W =
H
W U.i
W O;
J:
a
1:
I- O
zF-.
Lij
D O.
:0
• W W'
:1
• O
Z
IL 0
z.
City of r TT Wila MAY 3 1 1996
Central Permit System — Engineering Division
6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100, TdMORTWAN78,08
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWIIA
Per
App ,Ion #
—0 2'7
Phone: (206) 433 -0179
UTILITY PERMIT APPLICATION
Site Address: / /41400 In t Ct/(.U/kivt
'F Name of Project:
Property Owner: (,0U/ ri Phone No.: a--66. Q 6 ')4
Street Address: (p/ X) 5 / l%4 ' c Ot,t,,"1?.___ City / State/Zip: -. W 9
Engineer: Phone No.:
Street Address: City /State/Zip:
Contractor: Phone No.:
Street Address: City /State/Zip:
King Cty Assessor Acct #: Contractor's License #:
❑ Channelization /Striping /Signing
QUESTED ❑ Curb Cut/Access /Sidewalk
• ❑ Fire Loop /Hydr. (main to vault) — No.: Sizes:
❑ Flood Zone Control
❑ Hauling
)81. Land Altering cubic yards
❑ Landscape Irrigation
❑ Moving an Oversized Load
Est. start/end times:
Date:
❑ Sanitary Side Sewer — No.:
Exp. Date:
❑ Sewer Main Extension ❑ Private ❑ Public
❑ Storm Drainage
❑ Street Use
❑ Water Main Extension ❑ Private ❑ Public
❑ Water Meter / Exempt: — No.. Sizes.
Deduct ❑ Water Only ❑
❑ Water Meter / Permanent — No.: Sizes•
❑ Water Meter / Temporary: — No.: Sizes*
Estimated quantity:
Schedule:
AOther: --f—RE-6.
:........:.... .
FUND /BILL
N.1
�NI
Name:
Street Address:
Name:
Street Address:
Phone No.:
City /State/Zip:
Phone No.:
City /State/Zip:
❑ Water ❑ Sewer
<DESCRIPTIO.N: OF> `:P:RO:J ECT»
❑ Multiple - Family Dwelling
No. of Units:
❑ Metro ❑ Standby
❑ Single - Family Residential
❑ Hotel ❑ Duplex ❑ Apartments
❑ Commercial/Industrial
❑ Motel
❑ Off ice
❑ Retail
❑ Other:
❑ Triplex ❑ Condominiums
❑ Warehouse
❑ Church
❑ School /College /University
❑ Manufacturing.
❑ Hos•ital Other: VCI.C' • •
❑ New Building
.,.,..,..,�....,::: Square
RMA ?ION :::::::::::::`::::
:....:............... Footage:
❑ Remodel/
Addition
Square footage of original building space:
Square footage of additional building space:
King County Assessor's valuation of existing structures: $ Valuation of work to be done: $
`;READ >THi5 A:PPL l'
�ifC�N AND €�CNi�:WTH�;
Contact Person
Applicant /Authorized
A. n Sian r =:
Print Name:
ark
Lo 2/,i :✓ S it
Date: 5-./7 /Cl („ Phone: ao (a -7 a 0 6, Rd
Date Application Accepted:
Address: (2I a-6 ,
, " L
• Wr 9 F1 1 g Phone:�66,• 799-682 -i
Date Application Expires:
04/22/92
z
~ w
re JU
00
U 0
ww
W
I--
� w
w 0
2
2/Q
=a
�w
Z
z1-
ww
U�
0
• F-
wELI
Lt. o
w
Z
• =
0•
z
SUBMITTAL CHEW LIST
All site plans shall be provided in one submittal for review by the Public
Works. Department. Six (6) sets of plans stamped by a licensed engineer
are required along with this application completed and signed by the
applicant's representative.
The following information is necessary for Public Works Department
evaluation and approval of site plans:
• All utility construction is to meet the City of Tukwila Standards
• Indicate scale of drawing and show north arrow
• Identify location by address or distance to nearest intersection
• Identify public right -of -way and any easements
• Use standard 24" x 36" sheets for all site plans
CURB CUT /ACCESS /SIDEWALK /
CHANNELIZATION /STRIPING/SIGNING
O Dimensions
O Type of surfacing - asphalt, crushed rock, etc.(and thickness)
O Percent of slope and runoff direction
O Size of curb cuts / locations
O Vehicular and pedestrian traffic facilities, including signing and
striping, wheel chair ramps, curb cuts
O 20' of paving on all gravel driveways connecting to paved roads
FIRE LOOP /HYDRANT
O Type of pipe / hydrant
O Size of pipe/location
O Location and type of a valves
O Type of bedding and backfill material / percent compaction
O Distance from structures, storm and sewer facilities
O ; Location and size of thrust blocking
FLOOD ZONE CONTROL (Requirements are under Rood Ord.
No. 1462 and can be obtained from the Public Works Dept.)
O Lowest finished floor elevation
O Contours and elevations per National Geodetic Vertical Datum
**LAND ALTERING (CLEARING, CUT AND FILL)
0 Contour map (2' intervals) showing existing and proposed contours
O Estimate of yardage, both cut and fill
O . Erosion control plan with temporary and permanent measures
HAULING
O Quantities of materials to be hauled to and/or from site
0. Copy of Certificate of insurance coverage (minimum $1,000,000)
O $2,000 bond made out to the City of Tukwila for property damages
caused by activities
O Route map
LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION
O Location of DSHS approved double check valve •
O Type of pipe - copper, high density molecular plastic, ductile
O Size and depth of pipe
O Size of meter and meter box
0 Location and elevation of meter box (water meter - permanent and
exempt). Clearly show whether tap is on main or domestic service
O Location and type of tap
O Type of bedding and backfill material / percent compaction
MOVING AN OVERSIZED LOAD
O Copy of Certificate of insurance coverage (minimum $1,000,000)
O $5,000 bond made out to the City of Tukwila for property damages
caused by activities
O Business license with City of Tukwila
O Route map
O Dimensions (L X W X H) of overall load
SANITARY SIDF 7, EWER
O Type of pipe - coy te, PVC, etc.
O Size of pipe/location
O Percent of slope on pipe/length of run
O Connection point(s) to existing system
O Location of cleanout(s) and test Tec(s)
O Type of bedding and backfill material/percent compaction
O Invert elevations at structures and junctions
SEWER MAIN EXTENSION
O Type of pipe - concrete, PVC, etc.
O Size of pipe/location
O Percent of slope on pipe /length of run
O Connection point(s) to existing system
O Location of cleanouts and manholes
O Type of bedding and backfill material/percent compaction
STORM DRAINAGE (include existing topography and proposed
grading and surfacing)
O Type of pipe — concrete, ADS, etc.
O Size of pipe / location
O Percent of slope on pipe / length of run
O Location of all structures
O Square footage of area to be drained, including roof area
O Type of bedding and backfill material / percent compaction
O Invert or flow line elevations
STREET USE
O Complete description of proposed activity
O Map with address and outline of limits of activity relative to public
right -of -way and easements
O Proposed traffic controVdetour (per Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices)
O Proposed schedule (times and dates)
WATER MAIN EXTENSION
O Type of pipe - copper, PVC, etc.
O Size of pipe / location
O Hydrant types and locations
O Valve types and locations
O Connection point(s) to existing system
O Type of connection - live tap, tee, etc.
O Location and size of thrust blocking
O Size and location of mains, including elevations (profile)
WATER METER - EXEMPT
O Diagram of domestic system/tie in of exempt meter
O Number /account for existing domestic meter
O Size and type of material of meter, service and meter box •
O Site address
WATER METER - PERMANENT
O Type of pipe - copper, high density molecular plastic, ductile
O Size and depth of pipe
O Size of meter and meter box
O Location and elevation of meter box (water meter - permanent and
exempt)
O Location and type of tap
O Type of bedding and backfill materials /percent compaction
WATER METER - TEMPORARY
O Address and hydrant location
O Size of meter
O Estimate of quantity and schedule
After the Public Works Department has completed their review and the plans are approved, the applicant will be notified
by letter concerning the necessary permits and requirements; an approved set of plans will accompany the letter.
If the plans are not approved, the applicant will be notified by letter of necessary resubmittal requirements.
:.vn�tziF_ >r1EtA'i, to ^k�t:'':i:
y xSS {Yt;X,`r�.�iY, iiiu.vAt .4i.'i5Kr.1« k4..w.ku vvv..t1K "i- 21**111asr•
File:
35mm Drawing#
5mrn Drawing#
11 ,..; EXIST S5 MH'.
916.20,06 .
8'CONC,W,'
CENTER CHANNEL.11.78
PLUGGED OTHER DIRECTI
' WESTERLY LIMITS 100 YR
.61000 ZONE A -1
APPROXIMATE VEGETATION. UNE AND •
ORDINARY.HIG WATER MARK EL.7,0
)
EXIST. WATER VALVE I
EXIST FIRE HYDRANT
TOP OF BANK.
EXIST STORM NH
616 -20.92
IE(36'CONC,E6:W)-9.62
NEW IE- 9,82(175)
' II
II
k.
11
I I'�
II
II'
II
ZVI
11
1I
II
II
I I
11
011
, 7,1
1
I I,
80 LF 6' PVC
0 2X MIN.
EXIST SS MI
RIM .18.84
8'CONC,W
8'CONC,E
CENTER CIUNNEL.10.29
3
EXIST STORM 6H
669.17.94
IE (10'C0NC,5) -12.09
IE (3ECONC,E&W).10.29
TO BE PLUGGED AND
INLET PIPE TO 8E
REMOVED.
NEW IE =10.29(17W)
12 IF 18' PVC
0 0.4%
27 'LF 18'• PVC
0 0.49
WEST EDGE OF NEW
FLOOD ZONE ESMT,
'060E1151' 'SIDE OF BLDG.
tF DNG DRAIN TO PROVIDE
GRAVEL ALL THE WAY
, :FINISH GROUND SURFACE
410- .PREVENT SURFACE DRAINAGE
•IFR01A P061014-1651M45F•ALD0.20 -
G.T. BUILDING
.NEW ADDRION
NEW FF •20.70
\
GREEN RIVER
:' -. .
SO CO /1
WESTERLY LIMITS 100 YR
FLOOD ZONE A -1
20.40
;. SURVEY")ATA:
� L
'-•.CLINIERU6600316E. 5O. PER MON'S OF HORTON
`DENSSR.O.S:;i 38 PGS 186C
CITY 'OF
DEK10448k1', .
[TTY 0 6 - C 'LED SQUARE AT CDR. CONC, WALK,
8' 5.E.. OF S.E., OR. FARMERS INSURANCE BLDG.
14981 INTERU '1
'6
1F HIGH YCLONE ENCE O C EP &1ST CB TO In i::L_
................... (
) 7
- IE(41CONC,N)•1 pIlu.te.s2
p ,
20.28
EXIST CO id e' REMOVD
RIM. 19A s,'
' 1E(VCONC,r,416.92
IE(6 CONC,E).)6,92
SD CO 13
G.T. BUILDING
EXIST FF ■19.72
NEW FF ■20.70
-CURB AND GUTTER 0 0.4%
ALONG EAST EDGE OF PARKING
FOR DRAINAGE TO CATCH BASINS.
85 LE 5 PVC
0 0,56%
(EXIST CB TO BE REMOVED
RIM•,5.76
4E (IFCONC,S) -12.56 •
.IE 10'CONC,N -12.36
)E 6CONC,SW )-12.01
f C 6 CONC,E).121,91
LE rCONC,NE).12.91
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ALONG
PROPERTY LINE W /CWUN UNK FENCE
ON TOP. TOP OF WALL ELEV -0.5'
4p. JBOVE PAVEMENT LEVEL
c,
• K•j �
. 'S7.,8
20.7 f/ .
.'' �1
5.
• -'
rJj /� _ •
EXIST 55 MH (1591
E((12'O;N).9.82
IE(17015) =9..92
CONSTRUCT 35 LP DEPRESSED
VERTICAL" CURB 0 0.4% 6619.
• TO DRAIN DRNEWAY TO
1 CB #1'
•
I
I
EXIST CB TO BE REMOVED
149.1.15.31
IE(($ CONC,E) -11,31 •
/ IE(8'CONC,N).13,01
45 Y�. ck)
. 0 2X MI- -� •• MST SS MH
o . R114.14.76
EXIST CB TO BE REMOVED ,IE(1YN) -9,11'
RIM.14,72..--- � ; IE((tY5)).9/
IE(6C0p)-13.22 �^1F6 - -' r
15.69
' PP
EXIST IE -12.93
(1624)
EXIST CB (172)
R9M =19.30
IE(ECCMP,E) -17.%
10, BE RE S
C)
CC
I- h
w 0
fl • Imo' •
•0 Z
W
> Z u)
IIJ I -'Q
0 . M
co
'c1"
1-
14.76
EXb� XIST.C8 (1720)
EXIST IE 412.72 619.19.64 •
(1724) 1E(a'CGNC,w - )7.74'
NEW RIGHT -OF -WAY
DEDICATION
EXIST SS MH
666..17•32
112'N).8.42
ItS) =8.42
8'0) -8.42
_ _
IE.1 ti %� �''.0 .1.......7.4.....7A.
)(64L VAL .d . PP 11, f 13 'LE
,___..../...,;......--
\ \\ 16� -->P ON BOTTOM �:
.�a �
ELEV.. 13s / i � %' .;T � - _
�
i
, x`73..` .- .,:/,8
i i
IG12.0
(1636)
.tp -EXIST CB (1726)
R6M
91.20.53
11.(1 CMP,E))•114.
EXIST IE -12.90 TO BE REMOVED,
(1725)
573',,d'6
�? A
q5 j
EXIST CB (6727)
I.E. R (8' ICONC, 0) • 19.07
TO BE REMOVED
I MP,E -13.77
18'CMP,W -13.77
Tr BE R OVED
-[X151 STORM MH (1745)
91•20.34
IC 16CONC,E).14,29
2 O'CONC,E .17.14
IE IYCMP,S .14.54
IE 17[99,1 .16 51
%IST CB (1719)
919.19,36
IE(15CUP,N). 1 6.06
IE(1704P,5) 41631
CONSTRUCT 40 LF ROCKERY;.
RETAINING WALL HEIGHT •
VARIES 2' TO 4' ..
11
EXIST CB
919.17.53
IE -11.13
73.60
E %IST S10R6 MH (1602)
9161•22.10
, IE(36.CONC,S) -11,55
IE(35C0NC,E) -11.40
IMPERVIOUS AREAS:
EXISTING, IMPERVIOUS AREA = 57,375 -SF
. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA - 126,485 SF
FLOOD STORAGE:
DOSTING FL000 STORAGE UNDER 19.7
9L00D ELEVATION • 319,518 CF
PROPOSED FLOOD STORAGE UNDER 19,7
FLOOD ELEVATION • 319,067 CF AFTER
CUE AND FILL
CB 11, TYPE II -48'
E..10 34(18')
W /FLAP GATE
CB 12, TYPE II -45
9666.18.68
IE.10.45(1E )
CB 13, TYPE II -54'
W /01L -WATER SEPARATOR
RIM -20.50
1E.12.01(15 )
OF -14.26
CB 14, 'TYPE I
RI -14.30
IE.12.30(121
IE =12.05(15)
C815, TYPE
919.14.80
IE.12.80(121)
CB 16, TYPE 1
9166-17.36
IE- 13.22(17)
CATCH BASIN DATA:
CB 17, TYPE I
RIM.19.24
IE =14.74(17)
ca 18, TYPE 1
RIM -19.03
IE =15.06(12')
CB 19, TYPE I
R114=12,45
IE- 9.88(17)
CB 110, TYPE I
916.16.80
IE=11.04(12')
CB 111, TYPE I
RI66 =14.58
1E- 12.58(17)
10 =12.33(15)
CO 112, TYPE 1
RIM -14.80
I0- 12.80(17)
CB 113, TYPE I
RIM -14.43
10- 13.12(17)
I I1111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIlll .1111IIIIII- 1111111111 (1111 1111111111111111!1 III 111111111111111111111111
1. n
9111 7,{Z:..T`Z. ..0 {7.: �(�E 811 LIT PIT
Illl Ilulpll Illllllll uulml lllllllliilllllllll llllhull lllllllll lllilllll llll[llll lllllllll lllllllll IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII 111111111 uului
CB 114, TYPE I
RIM -15.20
IE- 13,20(17)
10.13.20(Er )
CB 115, TYPE I
669 =15.17
10.13,50(5).
C8 116, TYPE I
969.15,58
10 =13.91(8')
CB 117, TYPE II -54'
RIM -21.70
10= 12.08(36')
C13, 118, TYPE 1I -54'
0-121 (35)
CB /19, TYPE II -54'
RIM -19.52
1E- 12.46(35)'
CB 120, TYPE 11 -54'
619.19,32
I0 =12.68(35)
CB 121, TYPE 11 -54'
916.19,25
10- 12.91(35)
CB 122, TYPE 11 -54'
919 -19.96
1E-12.93(16')
CB 123, TYPE 1
RIM =17,36
10■12.86(12')
CB 124, TYPE 1
RIM -20.30
IE=15.80(12')
YD 125, TYPE 1
6666 -19.50
10- 16,28(12')
INDEX TO SHEETS:
1 OF3 7 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
2 OF, 7 WATER AND SEWER PLAN
3 OF '7 EASEMENT PLAN
4 OF .7 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN
5.OFt :7 SITE SECTIONS AND DETAILS .
6 OF' 7 NOTES AND DETAILS
7 OF' 7 TEMPORARY EROSION NOTES AND DETAILS
RECEIVED
: V
z a
W L`
Q 0 C4 c0
Z cn(0 CO
3 l 1
617 N CV
1-1040
c'4zo0
JU1211994 '= "''
ITY \
DEVELOPMENT
OS 19 dd��� /ORAL EY
v �
1.- �7'. ^ ^.1cS- 4•ruan.!.wf.,+ -rw.!. , ..°•-- .- .•.- \,...�•�� --T-r
2
,J
1
:SI'E EXHIBIT
RC.PLACE MENT
S 0816'14" W 250:35' •
u.
C
1. •
RECEIVED
OCT 31 1996
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
tin
e ®1111119w®1
4Ir�•®rte
.>s�I■sN1111►
_®■111111m8rF"
.48119•®111/.
.4IIIIa1118110►-
4 UA0Mr
,881 ®1511,'
. /191®81111IY-
.rlr%%14I11111P
�f.:T ;>r4i1111►'
.,rAR'\`4f911111r.
:A9111111R1911/'
,��itt111111v 1P-
..491111•1811""
4 ®U■9Diiw"
�:p�Iit♦1y11PW
1®%111111159P
\■ ®i/'
0.
VMAA ALE ST. N R.O.W. TO EDE
T TAL AREA 1839 SQ. FT.
I
•
•
EXISTING PO
POLE
10' ROW DEDICATION
ALONG INTERURBAN AVE.
AREA TOTAL 9982 SQ. FT.
S. 144TH
OEIAENTCEDE
AEAS
TAL AREA 8358 SQ. FT.
154tH STREET
1 -405
NO SCALE
19T Dote/T:Te: C7/01/1394 .15:43 Scab. ,1 430 MARK SUMROK XrMs:
I
1I �1r . • i i rl - f rI _ - rI p -- I- - -- i- -- - - - -v I ri T i 1 r- i- - -I p
, 2. 5
I_I_i_I_I.
6
I nls . s17.. RIZZ. LIS 91Z', 91Z BIZ EIZ -, •ZIZ -; :.TIZ: >, Aj ,��T , 91' , LIT i 911
. .F •