Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L95-0030 - FIRE STATION #53 - DESIGN REVIEWL95 -0030 FIRE STATION #53 DESIGN REVIEW 4202 S. 115T ST nWO twuroi Pam am MM. sotasTdl?Aloolon A1R Lr1T OP IOW Le! N�itt4mf t n wst�t nM1 11 •, I I. I I I I ' I I i c • c ; I I .c c c c c c o t_'f 1 t 1 lj I I i I .I Lttm Q ROOK Lt! REPSENCALPULER COSTUMED AREAS AT CO MED AAS LN trot T Sol w arts (t: i i� Ii . h I l 1 1 IRRIGATION PLAN Immo a • Panreloas FA t119t�4wM n1glMtbir aq*Min It 1E900 Intuuthtn Mr.S% Tok.W. WA 9116 206- 4M.0179 Nn Potter Golf Wild Clubhemt 13500 tottnthut Ave. So. 1466, WA 9516 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development HEARING DATE FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: SEPA STAFF REPORT TO to the PLANNING COMMISSION and to the BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DETERMINATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: Prepared July 19, 1995 July 27, 1995 L95 -0031 and L95 -0030, Fire Station #53 City of Tukwila - Fire Department John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 1. Conditional Use Permit Approval to locate . a fire station in the CM, Industrial Park Zoning District 1I. Design approval to construct; a 6,000 square foot fire station with a 15 stall parking area.. 4202 S 115th Street CM, Industrial Park Mitigated Determination of Non- significance, issued July 11, 1995 Libby Hudson, Associate Planner A. Site Sketch B. Site Plan C. Landscape Plan D. Building Elevations /Floor Plan E. Building Sections F. Floor Plan G. Lighting Details H. Mechanical Site Plan I. Electrical Site Plan J. Conditional Use Permit Application K. Design Review Application L. Color Board, submitted at hearing M. Grading and Drainage Plan 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Sutte #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Faz (206) 431-3665 Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR Page 2 L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 FINDINGS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project includes the construction of 6,000 square foot fire station, a 15 stall parking area, and landscaping. The fire station will be situated on a 3 acre site, located at the southeast corner of 42nd Avenue S. and S. 115th Street, in the Allentown neighborhood. The property is zoned C -M, Industrial Park, and contains an environmentally sensitive area, Type 2 wetland. The proposed building includes two - four apparatus bays with entry on two sides, a 37 foot tall hose tower, an office, kitchen, day room, exercise room, and sleeping quarters for 8 fire fighters. VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Existing Site Conditions: The 3 acre site is improved with four existing houses, a garage, a barn and four out - buildings which will be demolished to develop the proposed fire station. A 1.5 acre, Class 2, wooded wetland, is located at the northern end of the property. The wetland has been delineated by . the City . Urban Environmentalist. This wetland is regulated by the Sensitive Areas Overlay Zone of the Zoning Code (TMC 18.45). 2. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: North: Burlington Northern rail yard C -2 South: S. 115th Street and the Green River CM East: Commercial use and single family CM West: Single family CM 3. Terrain: The site is relatively flat. 4. Vegetation: The site is vegetated with 73 significant trees, primarily located near the existing houses. A native stand of alder and cottonwood trees are scattered through the northern end of the site, primarily in the wetland area. 5. Soils: The soils are composed of sandy silt. �; a h �s *sti u eau Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 Page 3 6. Access and Parking: The subject site has direct access to S. 115th Street and unimproved 42nd Avenue S. Two access points are proposed for the fire station. The western access will located within the right -of -way of 42nd Ave. S. and is intended as the return access point for fire trucks. The southeastern access is intended to provide ingress /egress for the parking area and exiting of fire trucks on emergency call. Total on -site parking proposed is 15. Parking for three (3) visitor's is proposed near the building entry. The remaining parking is intended for employee's only and is located southeast of the building, across from the apparatus bays. 7. Utilities: The property is currently served by public services for sewer, water and electricity. Public Facilities: A connection to the river bicycle trail is planned for the unimproved right -of -way of 42nd Avenue S. The applicant is required, through SEPA conditions, to accommodate the future bicycle path within the development plans for the fire station. BACKGROUND A number of permit applications are required to develop this project. A street vacation request was approved by the City Council June 19, 1995 to vacate a portion of S. 114th Street and S. 115th Street which run through the subject site. A Shoreline: Substantial Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit Approval, Board of Architectural Review approval, and compliance with the Sensitive Areas Ordinance and Tree Regulations is also required for this proposal. The property lies within the 200 foot shoreline of the Green /Duwamish River, which is designated a shoreline of statewide significance through the State of Washington Shoreline Management Act. Although the property is located within the City of Tukwila, the site lies within a shoreline area regulated by the King County Shoreline Program. The City of Tukwila administers the King County regulations in recently annexed areas until the City of Tukwila Shoreline Program is amended to include these annexed areas. An administrative shoreline permit will be processed for this project. A Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance was issued for the proposal with five (5) conditions to mitigate potentially significant adverse impacts. The conditions are: z .� z W CZ fin: (.)! • .0 0'. N 0 ' `N W =. W 0. 2 • I-W, o(' ,W W! uiz . 0- o. • Z. Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 1 t. } s Page 4 In order to preserve and protect the existing 80 inch Sequoia giganteum /Giant Sequoia tree, a porous pavement system shall be included as part of the road on the west side of the existing 80 inch Sequoia tree to allow moisture and air penetration to the feeder roots of the tree. The reinforced plastic product, Geoblock, shall be installed for a width of 5 feet and a length of 35 feet under the canopy of the tree. Landscaping and development within the right -of -way of 42nd Avenue S. shall be designed so that future development of a bike path can be readily accommodated. Best Management Practices (BMPs), as defined in Tree Regulations [TMC 18.54.040(2)], shall be employed in protecting all existing trees to be retained. 4 • The delineated wetland, and the buffer areas shall be protected with temporary fencing during all construction processes. 5 • The Fire Department will be required to pay a proportionate fair share of sewer improvements for the S. 116th /42nd Ave. S. 8 inch sewer line. This . report is divided into two parts, Section I, Conditional Use and. Section II., Design Review. Approval of each of these applications is required in order to construct the proposed fire station. The Conditional Use permit application is heard by the Planning Commission, while the Design Review application is heard by the Board of Architectural . Review. There are established criteria which must be met in order for the Planning Commission or Board of Architectural Review to approve the applications. ..,, � .i i� . �:[;a:.2 a�.;}2 • - �.si,�'�":�`. "�.�x.,�..Y�, unzaw+.t.. z mi ..0o. :CO 01" lilt w X w o. J' • LL Q; 112 a: • w, • • _,• •z . ..;w w • o o— • :w w' LL H. o' • zi. 0 -'= o ~ Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, #L95 -0031 FINDINGS Page .5 DECISION CRITERIA The Planning Commission is guided by the following decision criteria for the Conditional Use Permit for a fire station. Conditional Use Criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. The applicant's response to the criteria is contained in Attachment J. (A) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements In the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. The project will provide improved emergency services to the neighboring area. The size of the . site and scale of the building allows the fire station to be located a considerable distance from all neighboring properties, thus providing buffering from all neighboring properties. (B) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district It will occupy; The project meets and exceeds all performance standards of the CM Zoning District in which it is located. BUILDING SETBACK AND HEIGHT z liwC i • U UO;• . N0. Ww (Ow; .wo• I- w, . 1= 0 •z 0 I -' . W. • Z H H z • The proposed structure conforms to the height and setback requirements of the CM zone. The building is setback a minimum of 55 feet from the front property line, which is the property line located along S. 115th Street. The minimum required front yard setback for the CM Zoning District is 50 feet. The height of the proposed hose tower is 37 feet. Maximum building height for the CM Zoning District is 45 feet. LANDSCAPING The Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) requires five feet of landscape area along side property lines and fifteen feet along the front. The proposed landscaping along the front property line measures from 20 to 55 feet in depth and consists of trees shrubs and lawn. Side yard landscaping is required along the west and east property lines. Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR Page 6 L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 Proposed landscaping between the east property line and the proposed parking area averages 15 feet in width with the narrowest point being 5 feet in width. A substantial screen of trees, shrubs, and groundcover is proposed for this landscape area. The west property line fronts along the proposed western driveway. Landscaping along this driveway is 30 feet at the minimum point and incorporates existing trees with additional trees, shrubs and groundcover. PARKING Parking standards for fire stations are determined by the Planning Commission. The proposed 15 stalls appears to be adequate to serve the station's 12 employees. SENSITIVE AREAS OVERLAY A 1.5 acre, Class 2, wooded wetland is located on the property. All development is proposed to be setback a minimum of 50 feet from the delineated wetland. A 50 foot buffer and 15 foot commercial building setback is required for this wetland per TMC 18.45.040(c) (1) (B) and (c) (3) (A). The 50 foot buffer will be reduced at the northeast end of the building where the hose tower is located per TMC 18.45.040(c)(4). The buffer will be reduced to 35 feet in width and enhancement vegetation is provided in this reduced buffer area. No development will occur within the wetland or buffer areas. TREE REGULATION The project includes removal of trees, shrubs, and groundcover to construct the new fire station. 73 significant trees exist on the site Approximately 29 of these trees will be removed (20 of which are a result of an overgrown holly hedge). Tree replacement is required per the Tree Regulations and Requirements (TMC 18.54). The applicant will be using the 20% canopy coverage method (TMC 18.54.140(b), which will require approximately 30 replacement trees to be planted on . the property. These trees are noted on the Landscape Plan, Attachment C. Trees to be retained are required to be protected during the construction process with protective fencing as a condition of SEPA and as required under TMC 18.54.130 (2). (C) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Development of the fire station will result in a small increase in traffic from Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 Page 7 approximately 12 fire fighters working in the building, generating 16 trips per day. Emergency calls will also generate traffic. A sidewalk is proposed along the street frontage between the two proposed driveways. On -site vehicular circulation has been separated from pedestrian circulation. Emergency vehicles will exit from the southeastern driveway where the drivers will have better sight distance along the curve of S. 115th Street. The building and parking lot area are setback a minimum of 85 feet from the street. The scale of the building is similar to the neighboring single story houses and adjacent commercial building. (D) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Map identifies the site as Light Industrial. The following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land use Policy Plan are applicable: Natural Environment Policy 2: Encourage the use of live vegetation in development landscape plans. Policy 3: Discourage disturbance of vegetation when not in conjunction with actual development of the property. Open Space Policy 1: Strive to preserve steep hillsides and wooded areas in a scenic condition. Encourage replanting and revegetation of denuded areas not in the process of development Protection of existing trees and existing wetlands and separation of vehicular and pedestrian circulation have been incorporated in the project proposal. The new fire station will provide improved emergency services while retaining much of the existing vegetation and preserving existing wooded wetlands. (E) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. Environmental review was completed for the proposed fire station and a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance was issued. The conditions are listed under the Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95-0031 & L95-0030 "background section of this report. Page 8 A number of significant trees exist on the site, of which 44 will be retained. Trees to be retained must be protected during construction with temporary fencing [as a condition of SEPA and as required under TMC 18.54.130 (2)]. Of particular concern is the retention and protection of the existing 80 inch Sequoia giganteum/Giant Sequoia tree, located near the western access driveway. A 20 foot wide paved driveway located between this tree and the toe of the slope to the west would adversely impact this significant tree. The driveway has been reduced to 15 feet of pavement with five (5) feet of a reinforced plastic Geoblock support system, as a condition of SEPA. This support system will allow moisture and air to reach the critical root zone of the tree and preserve the health of the Sequoia tree. Compaction of the soil in the root zone could also have, an adverse effect on the tree. To ensure that all trees to be retained are not adversely affected by site construction operations, Best Management Practices (BMP's) as defined in the Tree Regulations [TMC 18.54.040 (2)] are to be employed per the SEPA conditions. Protection of the on-site, Class 2 wetland and buffer areas will be provided through temporary fencing during construction, as conditioned by SEPA. Adequate buffer enhancement has been provided within the reduced buffer area near the hose tower. To provide adequate sewer service, the construction of an 8 inch sewer line to S 116th Sheet/44th Avenue S. is required. The applicant is required to participate in their share of the cost, $30,000, per SEPA conditions. CONCLUSION Review Criteria (A) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare... The use is compatible with the neighboring commercial and industrial uses. Building setbacks and extensive landscape screening buffer the fire station from the neighboring residential uses. „., • Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR Page 9 L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 (B) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. The project meets setback and height requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets requirements for buffering the Class 2 wetland located on the site and retention of as many existing trees as possible is being proposed. (C) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, bullding and site design. The proposed structure and parking area are compatible with the surrounding land uses. The traffic generated by the use includes employees and emergency vehicles. The number of emergency calls will dictate the actual trips produced by the emergency vehicles, but the number is likely to be similar to that of the existing station located in the same general neighborhood. Non - emergency traffic generated by the station is expected to be approximately 16 trips, thus having minimal impact on vehicular and pedestrian circulation in the vicinity. (D) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The Comprehensive Policy Plan addresses specific development aspects such as landscaping and building and site design safety which are addressed in responding to the Conditional Use Permit decision criteria. (E) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The SEPA review was completed on July 11, 1995. Impacts to the existing trees, wetland and public sewer system were identified and measures to mitigate these impacts were imposed through SEPA conditions. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the. Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit as proposed. uJ/O (41,Auttikv., Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 DISCUSSION II. DESIGN REVIEW, L95 -0030 FINDINGS Page 10 This project is subject to Board of Architectural Review approval due to its location within the 200 foot shoreline area of the Green /Duwamish River, as required under TMC 18.60.030 (2) (ii). Board review criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. 'REVIEW CRITERIA (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site.' The site is configured in such a way that little of the property actually fronts on the main access road, S. 115th Street. The building is setback considerably from the street. A sidewalk, separated from the street with a planting area, is proposed along S. 115th Street between two proposed vehicular access drives. A pedestrian walkway leading from the public sidewalk to the building is also proposed. This walkway is flanked by a large lawn area with trees on the west and a planting bed with trees on the east. A variety of landscaping enhances the two vehicular access drives. Four existing trees are incorporated into the landscaping along the proposed western access, (located within the right -of -way of 42nd Avenue). Trees, shrubs, and groundcover, screen the southeastern access drive, which leads to the parking area. Parking areas are located to the southeast of the building and significantly screened from the street and neighboring properties with landscaping. .z•. 1-Z; • � w •UO: loci; cn'Li' • w I: • 'co LL.. • w o. i v' 1- w 1-•.10,, • z �. • w w' • :MU • _ , V N; • /7 • Z' Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR Page 11 L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 The building steps up in height, away from the public street, so that the greatest height is located in the interior of the site. The office entry area located closest to the street will be approximately 10 feet in height, while the main building mass of the living area will stand approximately 15 feet high. The apparatus bay area is proposed to be approximately 24 feet in height and the tallest point, that of the hose tower, is proposed to stand at approximately 37 feet high. This stepping of the building, reduces the mass and adds visual interest to the building's prominent roof. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony in texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Due to the pie shaped site, the building has a considerable setback from the street. The height also steps up, toward the interior of the site, with the greater mass of the hose tower located farthest from the street. Materials used for the exterior of the building includes cedar shakes and board and batten siding. The shakes add texture to the design, while the board and batten add an element of rhythm. The prominent roof anchors the building, setting it firmly within the site. The architectural style with the prominent roof and the exterior siding material, lend a residential character to the structure, fitting the building in comfortably in the surrounding residential neighborhood. Extensive landscaping is being proposed at the street frontage and along the south property line where the closest neighbor is located. Existing trees on the property are being retained and incorporated into the design where possible. The existing trees, with additional trees, shrubs, and groundcover, will provide significant screening between the project and neighboring properties. Pedestrians are lead from the new sidewalk along S. 115th Street to the main entrance of the fire station. Pedestrian circulation is separated from vehicular access. The southeastern driveway provides access for employee and visitor parking and also exiting for the emergency vehicles. Due to the significant curve of S. 115th Street along the subject property frontage, this driveway has better • z z� • w D J • U' .00! co o: •WI. W 0. Q, F- 0. zi- . Ww: • 2 'W w' . H V' II O W Z v- • z Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR Page 12 L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 sight visibility at the street edge. Therefore the western driveway (located within unimproved 42nd Avenue S.) is proposed as entry access only for emergency vehicles returning to the station. Separating the entrance and exit points for the emergency vehicles and providing separate pedestrian access, makes on and off -site vehicular and pedestrian circulation . more efficient. (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an Inviting and stable appearance. c.. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size . compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The landscape plan incorporates 44 existing trees, 33 replacement trees (replacing significant trees removed for development), trees required by shoreline regulations, trees required for enhancement of the reduced buffer, and trees within the required landscape areas. See the Landscape Plan, Attachment C. Flowering pear trees planted in a bed of ivy line the east side of the pedestrian walkway leading to the main entry of the building. On the other side is a lawn area with two groupings of birch trees. The lawn lends a residential character to the landscaped entry. Shrubs are used to add an additional layer of landscaping closer to the building. A buffer of trees and shrubs line the western access drive between the apparatus bays and the wetland buffer. A screen of trees shrubs and groundcover screen the parking area along the east property line. Three pedestrian scale light standards line the east side of the walk, while five taller standards Tight the parking area and the two driveways. The light standards will w; oc� J0 UO CD 0 W J CO w 0. ga; = a. 1-- w. zH 1-0. zI uj ,moo, w w. 0, • Z 0 =; Off. z Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 Page 13 be approximately 12 feet tall for the pedestrian areas, and 16 feet tall for the vehicular areas. The lighting is screened from neighboring properties by the landscape buffer along the east property line. The Tight fixtures are proposed to be shielded, with down - casting light. z i r- �w_ The lighting design fixtures consists of a white pole with a clear acrylic inverted o cone, housing a louvered Tamp enclosure. The design is compatible with the co 0 craftsman style of the architecture. J co LL (4) Building Design u) O a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. :3 b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent cod. neighboring developments. z w c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should 1--. i have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and Z F- 1-O:. ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. z t-. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for w w accent. D p;. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings U ►h� ,9 9 ON should be screened from view. 0 H'. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, w w standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be - O. avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. ell' U. The craftsman style architecture of the proposed building is evident in the z prominent roof and broad overhanging eaves. This style of architecture lends a rustic feel to the fire station. The roof overhangs help anchor the building to the ground and the site. Details, such as the angle support : braces and shingled siding, continue the craftsman theme. The architectural style is harmonious with neighboring residential structures built in a similar, simple style. Vinyl clad windows are located just under the eave line and repeated along the length of the building on the north and south elevation. The windows provide a horizontal element to the building, contrasting with the texture of the shingled siding found below the window line and the vertical rhythm of the board and batten siding. The main entry door is recessed within the south elevation. Windows flanking the main door and pedestrian sidewalks leading to the entry help to mark it as an access point. Exterior colors are intended to be earth tones with darker shades for the trim color. The metal roof will be a grey tone. Color samples will be presented at the public hearing. • Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR Page 14 L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 Mechanical equipment will be fully enclosed, located within the roof. Louvers for the ventilation system have been incorporated into the design by punctuating the arch at the gabled end. See the elevations in Attachment D. i- w: UO cn° .WI VJ J H w O; =a 1- w The craftsman style building design and staggered roof line lend visual interest to ? z: moo: the proposed fire station. The prominent metal roof and detailing at the east and z g. west elevation adds variety in texture and color by using shingled siding on the ::2 n lower portion, and board and batten on the upper portion. The arch detail p separating the board and batten siding from an upper shingled area is repeated ;o xt in the angle braces supporting the eaves. This adds a twist to the craftsman style w W; by juxtaposing the triangles of the roof pitches with the graceful curve of the arch �= detailing. '!- z. O~ z Exterior lighting is proposed for the driveways, parking and pedestrian walkway. Wall lighting will be situated along the south elevation, under the eaves (see attachment G. for lighting detail). Four light standards will be located along the perimeters of the driveways and parking areas (see Attachment B., site plan). A pedestrian scale light of the same design will be located along the walkway leading to the main entry. The lighting design, as discussed previously, is composed of an inverted cone which are simple in design and compatible with the craftsman style. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale; b. ' Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. As stated earlier, the lighting fixture design is in keeping with the architectural style of the proposed building. Earth tone colors are proposed for the exterior. This is in keeping with the rustic look of the architecture and the building site. No outdoor seating areas are proposed. Fire Station #53 Conditional Use and BAR L95 -0031 & L95 -0030 CONCLUSIONS Page 15 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. The proposed building is setback significantly from the street. Landscaping and a pedestrian walkway create a welcoming transition from the public street to the building. Parking areas are sufficiently screened from the neighboring properties. The building's scale and mass fits comfortably within the interior of the three (3) acre site. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. The architectural style with the prominent roof and the exterior siding material lend a residential character to the structure, fitting the building comfortably in the surrounding residential neighborhood. Proposed landscaping works effectively to incorporate the existing trees, maintaining the pedestrian and residential scale to the site. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation are separated and emergency vehicular exiting is restricted to the southeastern driveway for safe entry on to the public street. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. The landscape design protects many existing significant trees, incorporating them into the plan. Additional landscaping is used through out the site to accentuate pedestrian walkways, screen parking and driveways, and enhance the building architecture and wetland buffer area. The design leaves the wetland area in a natural state, while using ornamental vegetation around the developed area of the site to complement the building. The proposed lighting will adequately light the pedestrian and parking areas. 4. Building Design The simple craftsman style of the building lends a rustic quality to the proposed fire station which works well with the site and neighboring residential area. The design details including prominent roofs with broad overhanging eaves and curved angle supports, coupled with the exterior material of the shake and board and batten siding and metal roof, tie the design together in a comprehensive composition. 5. Miscellaneous Structures. The lighting fixtures are simple in design and compatible with the craftsman style of building architecture. RECOMMENDATIONS The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the project as proposed. Vt 6,„(y-r/A \O y rr e1i'("t we./ 6,„d z re w U0 CO CI W =. wO g Q; �w F- o. zI 2 U I-. W, F- U z;, o. z • f�i�� y1 / .. - /�� j Sys .� ... . ti.. 2. 1I I ,,��/►� . it J = -�,i % I I I I II�i j7 . a i% v� ---� %i 1t �I �Tr. ' .:� .. Y.. j \ \\ �'I/ ,•-. _ • w• : .i L Y y In '47.1111; dnu �\I'\I� — — — - - -a \I•. \���IIL�III j�j� r� J �.- :�, .: .1�Ci =• �1��*r 1 '; \'R�1I i,(ll' tLPi�..�d� I IIIIIVI, 16411'1 ��IIIIII� /.iI.11111114ttltii111= _ � �ril�rr�w_�y�_ ■ \ ': �_`, �6�' •�I, ... - ;..1r....51.:----.47:: n I . 1,= —i, . _ C, .3:_-1_ - •• . rIT I L.. ..1 _ :r \:r+ � =7 t * s•'t•^ �._I .' ill" �+_1 _:, %° ��= %'- -r - - ∎1 rr�_ – �'' _ .y _�— -_ -- -±l9__ -.Z. T_ ��' -r---r.,--. _._' ..._. t._i%"• _�. qtr -/ ` : - f= �•1. -. or... .....g..; ,,-;,..7.4 Irk' .Q10 ....x■ 4....' air"-- 7...:' 77 2rAllr'7.4V. 1 ''''e-; - ....Ar' ' 1� ''''.:...o :1-77EL4-s. TUKWDLA HIRE S TATOO I NO. 53 CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON r,�:i,.;;.:'c i•:�ti +� t�: d:.: �4. �: �:;s�.k�st��.r'a>�r..r.aa�,:ul, ar: �a{. su.wa- WAOHNOTON . . 042 SITE SKETCH •••• • ;",,i ::„. . Jj 3 9.2B - • --- • . .„ ■ /3 St•fift.,..- -- -- - 12".11.1cr • ,r----‘ lo'cottonl+ood 1 14"41deri_o.....x' I 8-41(1, (--, . . . erroltonwood • ° '4.3. :5011,11 Igr g -41/ler + .....) 0 24131der ,j , \AL V.14° 41'1r \L!„4"nulfe,1600,./ atrs L 024"Co fonaLood, • ,• e' 2 "CottolowooU t • ' „Ai 6. le 7•■••. t,‘ CP\ / cm= ‘—) 20-Tree 1.31. • r?).3 20\ Sic•t1,4oih.l. Al; 333/101 PACO .3 7411(9,100o Trees lStrIO : • % % l Cj .- • \ 4 /6-1109/polla \/1-...s % f -4 • \ \ % ,0 71P . I. . I ‘ , . • S\ri, ‘ 1 • \ Z I . i \ o \ • ••• / ■100d •• 14 Si.ec,th?,1“ GO,/ ft, Cottoip9o7 el' 24-Cotton46-Cil 84 IL" :...4-c-otion.„16:11\-1'6"Cvt(cai.“.chl , 07 e EDE LEGEND Oi ATTACHMENT B 11- Merritt+Pardlnl i[Zul 2 Di D ; 0 -- - LWuj 7 Zi , 11J co; r- 0 • •i taw torn- - um lamMut MM. MN nue M “Watti + namars 1.33.3 311 LUG ▪ Mum Loam - 3a MC. ma WIN ttinm MILILD .31 'TUKWILA FIRE STATION NO.53 TIMM% WASIONSTON 3103/ 038 93 ▪ SITE PLAN I F..LAMY 143.33 11. .1/43515a3M13 • -,ia.g.g4;,:./4,...maias.'eatea,,,,:a-c,a,;k:c-,s.%-1,,,i44,44.4i147,7,4,..,K:i A1.1 • bU-6tAJk • 54,A4 qr CorroA4%- 9c1 Gidipc■ ATTACHMENT C PLANT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE Mkt 1217 411 LEGEND -t. EXISTING TP1E. SAYE MO PROTECT • • ID 121 13/ NOTE 105514 TREE 10 IC ROWED REINACEIVIt 174EE ITO Kale 0 r C1.FI/11 33 4001 01 PLS. 110.101 20ISIC NO 94110.1( 010111/10X SCNIMPG / STREIT TREES ID PEA 30 MIL MT 1251770 01414:530M1 Ira 1. 41 SEEDED AS MO 4LS SO 01300 COM &DS Kt RECEIVE NI ILITCSATC 'VOCATION 513101. • e3e TOM 4 94°3441114..1 6.ims-17.11!ta"" 4 A ROMA' 13C101101 mar/ r max NM 0C1011111 0.01/ RED 14101E Kyclarra, 2" CALM Ma 3 CORKS MAGA I r C4011.1111 01011* 0000000 7 AidEsMilpS / 1;440014•111.STEll 3 POW smistris 5C0101 Pet PAIEDOTSUCA 104201/ 001.10.45 211 29 MMUS 111111011$ / 013400 /MN 11 C/11&117/114 / 0141111114111 KAI 2.01..068 041. 0014 r C41114 NI r CAM. NJ 51411.1115 3 00511 TURAIA / 5 CALLON 11DX.111 01.44 24 0:14115_51010161314 / 30 1040.1475 11075701 0:411CCO 41 YMCA CALITEINCA / 5 04101 PAC= WA "TIME 24 MOIS SW:WM / 30" 1(011.111111 RED flOVERNG ORME 30 SPOREA 10104DA ./1411017 RAMER / 2r 110270. MI 14111100 0A1ON'S 5111144 47 141.6 CUIPITATA %Mk / 5 54101 AUK! SWIM TIM S MAMA 101131105141 WNW / 30" It OIL SY 11ift1 MUM 0111.411441 01010 C04134 HIC1057■110105 1/44•109/ 17.411011.30* 0.C. 101111101401 44000* 11110 11.41115./ I GA1.101124 0 C. 144405 IVY 4CROCA1.15 'STELLA now/ 154104. 0" 0.C. 0411.11.7 111110.11 CM 701.11 / 1014.1114. 24' 0 C. 5 .404611011 WOK • Merritt•Pardini •: • P•Fl;-- LANDICAPI ARC141710111 • TAZZ=FaStri ,• WIRMINIS • • TUKWILA FIRE STATION NO. 53 TOLIMA 11411111117111 s>a>w sass 101•. m. 1111111EINN OS I. Di L ® SOUTH ELEVATION T4,)(7 .s. 01. DOrO . sun* M. swat saw. M. L .0{110. M. pc Y,r UM/ aoor, m. J NORTH ELEVATION .ts_A. M. o swat sac. m. 1IlIOw ..�rrt_� M VO ■1101 M. of ra. II r ICI ( a1o. rn rrats-.sr OOP COMMA M. 1 ®. I o ® ®L9 0 ®a ® L.� AO • _MSM. M. DOWD% M. J O as s,r ELEVATION • • SSOar scan M. Ia OM u rr Mo 4P ATTACHMENT D • MsnRt +Rvtli,I Oral fur Kr.f rm. M. M.umu 0S. — PONDS fCK. m. IOUO . SO M. m 1crt: 0 lo..11 NIKKO rn nrrn © SOUTH DETAIL ELEVATION IOW rK • ro • OWEST DETAIL ELEVATION F 0L• r/! - 1,42. QQ QQ© M. I ©O saga I a0 pauN �i,j�U..�l,yl�wlI�.9b,�u,�' .T.a ..smn M. L OWEST ELEVATION • W, WJ U O': CO o;. cn W W W O' 2 U-Q d F— O' z Q Q' ;O N O F— W IL; iu- H U. W : Z 1- O TUKW ILA FIRE STATION a NO.53 nessA POP EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS MOOD. M A3.1 1 BUILDING ' SECTION 0 LT. OFFICE mu, • • ..1r _.._Jrr _ jr, © EAST —WEST BUILDING SECTION ••r .° OBUILDING -a SECTION 0 LOBBY frwr. R • Or-r O. BUILDING SECTION 0 APP. BAY WALL llV • 1•{ • • • ®BUILDING SECTION 0 HOSE TOWER f.... IX • 1.-0' • Merritt +P i*I • MU=m.C• • br •DMI • LI. II aAQ • 1 O BUILDING SECTION 0 KITCHEN - f'M`]'"6 IOW, IX . 1•d • nor n�n�Vs:wcd .;5ii3'. TUKWILA FIRE STATION NO.53 lUOMA WASHN01011 4011 0.0 SW/ r 0611115 0611115 . . ~��B��U/II�L��DI MIN/�N�N G�p SEC f IMS A3.2 e ^.ran »••' v. 4vy�,,. intin� tit:tt.,•,•._i:E:frk:'nawl:�le:: �.:a(SY,1 • O IV-IT _ Idi Ur fi- D— n : ra • (i Pole top luminaires for garden, park and pedestrian area lighting applications. Luminaires and poles are matched for proportion and cohesive design. Choice of compact fluorescent or H.I.D. light sources and luminaire styles. Z Z w W - 00 (/) C U W J = F— w0 Q (Y J < co d 1• W Z ■• O Z w D U 0- 0 1-- W w 2 F-F -- — O •• Z W to U= O Z 9189P 9898MH 9898S 906 EZ MI III e A q#4 WNW A Lamp 2 18W PLC 1 100W ED•17 MH 1 70W E•17 HPS Pole top luminaires with shielded light sourc: j Die cast aluminum construction with louvered lamp enclosure. Clear acrylic cone. Slip fits 3 inch O.D. pole top. Color Black or white. Lumen A B 2500 8500 6000 Pole 5 "e x 12' high with tenon. — See page 153 101 **• ■Z ■ 989+ ■ :s ■llitm ■■ti. 0.6 107 .'.■1031•I. ' ■ ■...11h. •1, . ■ „ ■.1•n 6 inimummausen U■.u■■■■■■ m z 4 6 0 10 1 t - Num ■ 6 IIIIM• • ■■, kin,.■, vo■Lv.11 ■„ ■,1 ■.1 I •\111\1■ ..■L11 \t■\' ■. ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ m, t 4 6 6 10 9389P 9183MH 9183S 906 A Lamp 2 18W PLC 1 100W ED•17 MH 1 70W E•17 HPS LEW111J7 1111 Wee ,,AVI 271/2 133/4 271/2 133/4 271/2 133/4 ■ _ 9189 ■1.w\■■ 10 ■ ■ ■ ■.O■ N 0 m 6 MENINX. .E■. ■Z .■. , ■ ■ 6 ■•■■221■ 0.6 ■►N■ ••. .'.■1031•I. ' ■ ■...11h. •1, . ■ „ ■.1•n 6 inimummausen U■.u■■■■■■ m z 4 6 0 10 Pole top luminaires with white acrylic diffuser. Die cast aluminum construction. Slip fits 3 inch O.D. pole top. Color: Black or white. Lumen A B 2500 8500 6000 271/2 133/4 271/2 133/4 27'/2 133/4 Pole 5 "o x 12' high with tenon. — See page 153 WW1 *Pi Rob INP 4 pm. ktarlitUl no, 1 ( 19369 .■. 101 N2L1 mom INP'170W 6 ■.■� ■\ ■„■ ■■��■■i i°®■ii i■Tv 1 t - Num ■ 6 IIIIM• MN vo■Lv.11 1 ■ ..■L11 ■t111 Wn1■n m 2 4 6 6 10 no, 1 ( 19369 f0 ■ ■ ■■IMI N2L1 6 ■ ■ ■.■� ■\ ■„■ i°®■ii i■Tv ' il■i i■i i MEN= • D I 44; 03s 045 • 1 3 -- GAS'' ,....., ‘ • NETER \ '. .:...: ,•.,...,-, ..,.., „?..,...-.::..., ' . ;.."7." \''. ''''sr' C....•.'*1-' . \,.,...". .'7..i.,,,' ■• \ • ., .• / ..r.„:-.'."' ..•‘:., , • .. c...::"' ‘ • . ' 4'. . %,',.••••?...■.•-••'‘.. \ v,•??,-. ',', •"‘., / \ . .. , . 4, \ .---/- „:„......2.,, .,. , :i....„, ••• • , ..... -,...c.,,,....,2,,\,.....- • ., . \ ....... ......... r •-) . -',......._........"' \,....\,, \ \ •ck .,,,,' 1•,,,,\ ck;;;;\.:.7‘.‹":„.• ,,,c;k...,4":::.'74'.-. . s,,,/- • \\,..../"•••• ( ,..'"••' • . \ \-..-'''. /— \ \ \.-..X/ ‘‘,'''' * s• .:';" i \ CONDENSING UNITS (ACC-1. 2. 2) • • • • • • ATTACHMENT H Meratt+Pordim TUKWILA FIRE. STATION • NO.53 TIMPAILA WAIHNOTON SITE PLAN MECHANICAL • • M1.1 ATTACHMENT • SEATTLE CRY UGHT PAD MOIIFTED TRANSFORMER CABLE T.V. IIAIIOIIOU Ca5 Las OYA TELEPHONE' HANOHOLE l i \... \ \\ ELECTRICAL LEGEND • LIGHTING FIXTURES ® FIXTURE TYPE - SEE SPECWICATIONS O CEUIG MOUNTED FIXTURE .0 MALL WONTED FIXTURE Q 2.A' RECESSED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE ❑ 2.7' RECESSED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE RECESSED FLUORESCENT n0TURE • POE MOUNTED LU11IUME POWER O JUNCTNIN BOX (ABOVE CEXING) V® JUNCIXIN BOX (O MALL) 9 DUPLEX RECEPTACLE • DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLE A DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - MOUNTED ABOVE COUNTER QGn DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTING 9 20EN RECEPTACLE ® POWER POLE • EOUWMENT CONNECTION • MOTOR CONNECTOR CP DISCONNECT SWITCH o• PNRLBWRD - 70/18/170 PANE1BOMD - 40011/2770 OO GROUND ROD m TRANSFORMER COMMUNICATIONS • TELEPHONE CUTLET ✓ DATA OUTLET. ✓ TELENISION OUTLET 05 PUBLIC ADDRESS SPEAKER (COUNG MOUNTED) .© PUBLIC ADDRESS SPEAKER (MALL MOUNTED) TUKWILA FIRE STATION NO.53 EMERGENCY GENERATOR SEE SHEET E3.1 FIRE ALARM SITE PLAN SCALE: ARE 8AR11 CONTROL PANEL MANUAL FIRE ALARM PULL STATION (+4t AFF) C31 F*E ALARM HORN WITH STROBE LIGHT (00Ff AFF) UNLESS NOTED 014(RWI5E �/F HUT DETECTOR, RATE OF RISE 11'PE. 135 DEGREES 1M[D co, IONIZATION TTPE SMOKE DETECTOR Op PHOTOEUCTR8 51108E DETECTOR Q! A SWORE DETECTOR, A8050 CUING (11'c AS 51(041D) n0* DETECTOR /SWITCH 9 TAMPER DETECTOR/SWITCH DOOR MOLDER CONDUIT --e RACEWAY 1RNING UP - RACEWAY TURNING DOWN RACEWAY CONCEALED W MALL OR ABOVE CEXINO, EXPO5E0 w UWWSHED AREAS RACEWAY CONCEALED IN OR DEED* FLOOR AI o 4/24/42 SITE PLAN =z'= JesiiTri W 10 A • • E1.1 :.1 : 1: 5KC,' e. JEO' 8iiicin± ilOi1. F:. n. �r •�1.i+rr.SLntii= a'.Im:.�liw-Y;': ai,;.' i= 3!:...a ATTACHMENT J RED. CONDITI� SAL USE jto APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPQEIY L 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 !R;STA:FF USEON 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: J5tal OF A- I�F kl MU4IkPA-L Ft t• ST,q<T1o4 PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) `-04Z S I i fi=r- 5i`. Quarter: Section: 10 Township: ,3 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) APPLICANT:* Name: g A-I-4.D{ L. E� Address: Phone: - 0 7 '7 Signature -,-, �t� `� Date: / /\ A-- ) 6 I g 5 * The applican the person om the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP . PROPERTY OWNER Name: Phone: I /WE,[signature(s)] `/ swear that 1/we are the .a+"rer(s) or contract p "Pr aser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: M k`"( /g I1 (15 CONDITIONAL USE APR '`ON Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: MI I >(-1) RES { P 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): 6122 — 7 f �12v tc 7. ADJACENT North: 11—1 Dl.)-11Z) k £ RL1aG-rTc44- L. z.-r - KAI L `rAi2p LAND South: RPA-t7 I LA-`( Jr Kt V USES East: C.—c2f- M X12 — A-L__ �► I- r L� West: FAH L`i DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale/retail/warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitateunderstanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site):. 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: a • w re 2 U O' J I w 0'. ga S2 a w; Z I- o. zI uj n o. off' Z'. N; z. CONDITIONAL USE APPL 10. (continued) Page 3 C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE:; i.'• ::_te`r :'ii ,dc;;Iv;4,.•.1A',3t.:6..'xr ••.ueist2iYmattiS�' sus+_ �z '•m. "r�:y6"'sl"lii",ir1::°i� -'� -`�. • Ul oc v o Of • • W ='. ui J' • u. F=.W; _; z� •z o1-; :W W. X v z;. U __ ,z ~ • 10. A. The use will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. The proposed Fire Station 53 is intended to improve emergency response in the community, and so should improve public welfare. The Allentown neighborhood where the proposed site is located is an aging residential neighborhood. Several aging structures will be demolished and removed from the site. This project should be beneficial to the neighborhood and may help revitalize the area. z 2 u�lD 00 o wW; LIJ B. The proposed use should meet or exceed the performance standards that are . required in the district it will occupy. The project will be subject to the requirements of the Board of Architectural Review, g a; which should insure a high standard of design. It is a goal of the project is to create a N d. facility which the neighborhood can take pride in. tax 0 z w w: 2 M- No traffic impact is anticipated as a result of this project. The proposed fire station O . replaces a station in the same neighborhood, and so will not result in any increased traffic w ~` wi on the . local streets. The traffic impact of the project will be subject to review in the SEPA �?' process,.which will require traffic mitigation as appropriate. �` 0 iii z, 0h C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. The Subject site is over 3 acres which - allows for very large setbacks, and the proposed station will be of a scale compatible with surrounding residential and commercial uses. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. The proposed Fire Station 53 development includes preservation of a on site wetland of approximately 1.5 acres, and so supports the Comp. Plan land use element: NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, Goals 2 and 3, and OPEN SPACE, Goal 1. The construction of a new fire station supports TRANSPORTATION/ UTILITIES Goal 3. E. All measures have been taken to minimize possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The design will be subject to review by the Board of Architectural Review. The community has been asked to participate in the planning and design of the proposed fire station center through public meetings. This project is seen as an asset to the neighborhood in which it is located, and should help to revitalize a neighborhood which needs an economic boost. Beaver Bend Property Legal Description Before Consolidation Lots 1 and 2, of Block 26; Lots 3 through 9, of Block 26; and lots 10 through 15 of Block 26 of C.D. Hillmans Meadow Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division # 3. Lots 1 through 6 of Block 27; and Lots 7 through 12 of Block 27 of C.D. Hillmans Meadow Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division # 3. Lots 1 through 4 of Block 28; Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Block 28, Lot 8 of Block 28; and Lots 9 through 15 of Block 28 of C.D. Hillmans Addition to the City of Seattle Division #3; All as according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 86, records of King County, Washington. Beaver Bend Property Legal Description after Lot Consolidation Blocks 26, 27 and 28 of C.D. Hillmans Meadow Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division # 3, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats; page 86. records of King County; together with unimproved and vacated South 114th Street, and South 115th Street within said plat (vacations pending). 'w4111is61 G: BOARD OF ARCHF77CTURAL REVIEW EC L._ t`v1 E. D -);if r E 1Y9r: D ESIGr EVIEW ATTACHMENT K APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA oocvMmum 1. y DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PMLf�!?" 6300 Southcent r Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) '431 -3680 OR SI:AFF USE ON } ere 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: A r Z7 sv. p7 .5-7A/44.6 .r7•e/ _ — r ePV z ffi°mefriur ,mx' .r4EE�i v4 �l� r F�P(o -6 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub - division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) liZaZ Sow/ /Zes - sr: 7u /a4v64, 98/6-; Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) Name: 44' J 77 .ri AM. 4r/vciMe. A • e - ss: fZes.r /T7 .- Q7 /W/ Ave. /70/ ely›- or .esecE Acaof/1, ea aj . 4•ZG� 3s 3 -S � -mss Signature: �i'1�� .0i'� Date: '99/ /s —'" /99 * The a plicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to w om all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. APPLICANT:* AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY .Name: (:/T'7' D - 7vKwl O4b'NER • Address: (a240 �oc,DNC ii�-R B4 -v772 `I'l g 6 Phone: GON7' r I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the cifwner(s) or co tract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the • best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 5 '1.33 c» 7? z • w fx 6 -J0 U O CO 0: co w UJ w O: u_ _. Nd w 2 I- 0; ww o. N OI- I O; ui z' z .d °JAF D OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW( DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC ' ~4N Page 2 CRITERIA The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to e. criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the critel If t... space provided for response is insufficient, attach .additional. response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE . A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping,.and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. . C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: ' %/Ye A9/504101 4*'Y 4044 /// 44-Y/A/4 T 725 f/r. / ,qpie Tf f'iea/ T t�f1 -r 4'44,✓ 7 /�+/ /d '4 7/1 d4VYJ /c4L /.tor/34e-7- . ON/ .r zA40 1/4 avly/Uiv/ly' /1,140' h X0'4 4cgeV9-4r7-4v�1 A /bY .6 ".CeoY /0 %i/6 .r��i_ �✓� !� /r� 9 G //e!e 'Ir4T/m✓ .lbi-7Z f "o7,/ f /r<5:f /b,YTiz. f 4/°i"A 4.771 -r, .s 7 f Y.e. S'«.E,r i2 /va3G /c 714 GG, / 4/ 2 �F��S7X/ f/f 7 A /ice ��47P7 7 A-i4g4 /77 /4In- ,4•vp .ice, ' 7' -'1 koz- ,E./ /r ,ee°ovzedet.u.)/ ,e- eoU4/f - lo•.tN , r�s 72," Y/kEwygy 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA, A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. • B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: %f 'HA / //t/4 07G- 77te Aev,45 /,V /.r 727 4/IP:t✓77r4t cf Avz - ' • 74r:7 �EJC; V7 /'�'l ..C' E ( 1$' . GGosr 7l!/V" Avl, 44' d •4J/ etAr. W7) /A/ fW 7746 Sq /// /Jf / i-4 4 -Y /O.E#i/7TA21 ea405014Vl3Ys 1 X64-7 ' 'tt Ai4r+/ 6/�C!/G av A( ,/e6 v/Q, fry-Avo. /1.5-25T. ,4v4t' '7M J J /r7! ,e /�t/.0 4€4 ./If ',C /i✓ti t1f e- Z ( 4J° . -r I11�S4 /o-r- I'T7110?7- iLfrte3A+c77/v4 '71, 44.44�jvT Alf .r• /� 1/ i _. /ai G✓ z z w 6 U O: (0 0 w J H CO LL w u. • d tu z I- 0 z 1-: U co O -' C3 1- 1- u- O- : w z' U -: o- z .BOARD OF ARCHITECTU9AL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC,m,,. ION Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should,promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. . C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. z D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, z mitigating steps should.be taken. • w E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged. N o F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- w plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be cn u_ effective in winter and summer. w o G. In areas where general planting will not prosper; other materials such as fences, walls, and ga a: pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. N H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- w scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the z' building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive z oo' brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. • Ili V 0; RESPONSE: 0 7-#44e Ale, ,4 1/4"'/444/7- zWie/l eie o 7-/e-0:r riloW aTt iC w w 4/7,71177W 7A1OV h'»-1 J/77 7) 7 ,Q.e• xerm/Aritv ? � - T T 'Jerzrz.€. 77/s" L�/T . - V - Ej7 �0g774'✓ Z UN • o 7 S/T.� �' /GL / 'z 'L4/A/ fi-T !t/�a�J'F J rte AbJ.r //cr1.:. i% E rz x ! /6,v /i= /�T de/re' iN b,� z . . X./7Z 449//,‘ r'.0eak74 J /l, z .1446‘.4/41/414 iP- 77A14- A 5 " 7D ?WA" .r " 72& .�1Y/117/t/!, . ye-4/7A-774V r/lpv /a .ti4Ni. 'c 7 -rein E /,V4 fec�gTV 77,te z91/444 ,44 /L yr4 1 ra 77218 ,0)4.47". , J 0V.J`7 ` 44 A/A - ,72_74' ?n ? J '7 4 /!/,emu/ 4GAC/ km/Y. 4cyczawe r4 4ir —O.a0 av 77-1 ,ru2/729 /�i�o�.ErC7Y Griv,E / .e cux/y -y 4ffiFTY /2��+' ,Ex7 /rte G a,17 -bw /✓ ,A ' ' 7 ' .4007'4O.6 t� Fn'L BOTz/ A i-X/A>VJ wff /i,E /Y07 0/44e-77,4/4 A4"7 riE01,.E0e77 G /4/7"7/1A I44 ,gwV/zi/e 7 .roe 7-77-0,44 epa" 77/. SE,Cv' Age-64.f Pi/ T�`t' �c/c v/ .4.€‘ rtwz /e k %.5:14) .244' 7z, 7 2417 4. BUILDING DESIGN ,E 1Tirv��. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to.appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. bOAKU U1= ARCHI1 tc l URAL KtV ItVY DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC'�11 Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of . detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual 'interest. RESPONSE: .1,//L 'N( ■*,'o.e,r /,VV /f /e€0.7- L -,4 01,4/,` .7 /'tE ' .si4'AeG ,ear .r./7771 YOL 1A4g ,z 4e-r , r= /./.-/7Y A// V74 77-16' - 004- 1 c ..l, orFi1 /G G�i�7f>y/1N� -_ T 44A/,vl. Jf/ .eEt�ro i / 2 //' &/c g 4e Ef V Y/ a/c !e/ozW .r /�lit/4 /./ /?74/z,F. ' re- _egeo"rte,`, eon✓y /f7z ve,Y 7E . odieov,v,0 ,4,4 Art// i''m /A/ .cam Gd Fi4GAA 4 . .r4f4tv41/V4 £f "YJ,Fim /V2 /1 _4 1e.F,G /027X 444/4 7r4e.411 DeX/t..f/c/T}! l 'VZ 2 l .r.E772tA /4/ cY ,4 L .se /5i.40✓ /cAtt ��/ /i°/Y/, /4'7 /046 .alt 47,7- ' Il�G/c GoiyO. ,n!.r /N4 dot/ /72' i✓ /t.L gee- f4 4 I ,54Aq j t/c v /.EG✓. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: .4 l'/‘/L /TY •r /GN A'Vv .r�: �zc/.42. 1,�.�e / 4sr /.v4 l Gi j ti06,6 i w /LI /4/T 44,47.- ' /r/ 1771 77 G T /Ty ,E/V7744,vc.E. PEog'$ ZZ',4v .rc�G,G L/4 T7,v4 lit /GG £ v, 7/79l s4. A '444 u' /, 717l4L W /GL .f4tv /J.E Thtir,4, S�/.4 GL.�,��c4� �l le/ /GL x.10 ,EA/e1/A/v€,E 2'5" �4 : �y1 • ..i '?ettPdrItMfib??-:,1L -r l.rCtX +Ymtfo er n. A`t aat t± r3lg": siV! rIN VY N'i4•KecxS�..41"faMf.Wfep,'{agr ku fty!!�o.zcu:r »,mrun..x ??�s? tmrxr +;x:: s,g1•1:Mrtrn;nt: • z �w re 00 y0. U) w J = F-' w0 g u. 1- w z Z 1.-. 1- O Z 1- U• 0 0Q • 1- W W. r- -'- r- 0 ui z 0 !? H H Z • W. • U U O: ATTACHMENT M CO W , • _` • Mertitt+Fbniini • WOO'• • IL •C CO ii- _. z OI-i :W W O` .O N: O LU CO 04- TUKWILA Z . E N STAT FIR5 • NO.3 CONSTRUCTION TABLE .0.41 •s s!•nw It sIA .e. ..ri vt f1wff tL• 1111141.1/111} ALM •, LEGEND FXISTINI: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION • Set Rod & Cop •• Wetlands Flog Walerm.ler • fire Hydrant w Gate-Valve Water Meter —.— Water Line Cos Line Phone Line Power Pole Power Pole with Trans former Guy Wire 0— Storm Lin. • Storm Drain Catch Basin • • Storm Drain Manhole 011 -Wafer Separator —s— Sewer Lin. • • Son Sewer Manhole - 0 -0 -0- Chain Link Fence Trees - � BIOS WALE SYMON DS :.. ;,i'::iv''<i:'. ctc , +�t�;ar.•W;;;: "g'e'y�;J:� +: ; a: i" r.' vt=.: .'::':+�1::= 1;;�:t >>'.vc'[.iia: Sr:$ix':i',':� «`dx:rti'a na "iurr'4a;:11:w,: • ROMA VIANINITCM Le n NW/ DUDS ' SITE PLAN DRAINAGE! GRADING isra: ra rei. Cl .1 o 0 0 0 EAST ELEV SCALE: 1/8" = 11-0" .4111111111111111111 .4111111 111 111111111111111111.- _damn! 1111 1111111111 111111111111.... ...411111111•111111111nowskalisia -al11111111A1111/10"- sittipl1111 al1111111111111 " 1 11111111N Ob.- alC11111111111111110- sivint. WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 11-0" 0 ' irialedglivAzieansbaduaeskaa,tatit 0 Wrwit0-40.34Nntx-at-vgii5.42-tWVAgi.e-, 0 1 t ::• !!tfit :• r:: :; t: ,:: , •."�' L ::r ; -' Hn : r i � rail 0 RcLukk v-z,t --'1/Z//9s° Q141z- Al9frbvc21 Merritt+Pardini LP—N "iILU: ci r' t: utt: ii fr • n t 'i, 1 J ;S: 1.1 igEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 11 -0" 0 Architecture Planning Urban Design Union Depot H,stonc District 1701 Commerce Tacoma. Washington 96.02.3207 206 363.9700 Percival Landing 214 West 4th Avenue Olympia. Washington 96501.1004 206 753.0067 Members o1 The American Institute of Architects Protect Title TUKWILA FIRE STATION NO. •53 Date Revisions JULY 27, 1995 Sheet Contents EXTERIOR ELEVATION OPTION H ,1e4 icuereq `.. cmi;otlet.n. vgeN IN Jae.t'VI vw• y 1R K'M11M1I'Ve+1k koeJe•1 MOM W4.1'� reb; WW1 an R'NY. Scale Ret North Sheet Na UJ 00 co 0 W W; W o' ga -J1 J; =d _ o z 1-t • Lu 2 o 0 H_; ▪ W` F=--- U. o w Z 0-. rz 0 ,+....,. nC,iS.- >'iZ:t,'r.�s.�'� `�}.n m*; vit: 5ta+ i��-°. w •'i".>a'S1;:,k�+rvit ;'�fi.`rii3rr` Ct;� .4pik5`gp`t'Mr.`Kt:.•*N ;^ "St S:ti4 "+�^r:e+��kq::S:SrF 2"'t�,la�'.naliik •v n?v"C '.?':' *'•tiiiM'1�i"lbt+YB'E<sH tvA: 2rHi,: Y. sii., �iA1 '.pkr'�':it2{?Yttisi'..'.tc:. MATCHLINE 1=11 II. II II I P 101 1,1 11". F. 1' IT 11;',19.1.111U. 7,1g ■11,• ir 17, 1 11 .,.. 1111 ,Itiiil IP 17% 1 nuli isri Int f , hii 1 1 _ • 1••• 11117 II 11 II mar *tom cram; mitt col 11.1_ in NI oil ot 111 1 1 I 111511111.71 151, 1 1 1111 mgr. iniarg lira. 1 1 mit gl1j1111 11 II BIM 111111 $11111.1111 el1 I 11 111111111117111111r6 1 1 1 WWI /II I _ 1441.0 I - • • NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 0 1 1 1 tlgtr! AIXU 11ttlll sirtimilsonionutiol t ,n>r tgjiiu iili : I t 1881 1 n aJ, i 1 t�l 1e • 31111;* 111 t L�ililtli 7. L } Merritt +Pardini Architecture Planning Urban Design Union Depot Hatonc Orstrrct 1701 Commerce Tacoma. Washington 98402.3207 206 383.8700 Percival landing 214 West 4th Avenue Olympia. Washington 98501.1004 206 753.0087 Members of The American Institute of Architects Protect Title ....••=m1 TUKWILA FIRE STATION NO. 53 iJ V W O; • • • =a a. • U � !O N' 'W Wr • V _ ;• • 'z ; Date Revisions JULY 27, 1995 Sheet Contents EXTERIOR ELEVATION OPTION u NPa mean] .. cmwn ,rain WWI da. NOW'. Scale Ref North Sheet No A.2 0 iu:: lni�.i'ic�i~:Vi„cf`il''aNu ct.:»:, t%;^.`•' s '= : <.l',';` ✓ ":e`Jrvr. >aa�..:,i` ids: i.'; ei%" o: 4Ss: Ji,;:✓, lslilia�u"uu.4.i:yaiiieei " "(F.: ,.v• "•:J� ':r- . .• .. da.5 .�.Y'i;;l. {':.'��, -i h,,�y4;.'itr.:$s wR3..:d,: is wS=:. F,., iJFi .:'d�'k.'nf,.:sh��ri.:i',{}, '-0' ?3;' * v+ - .x'•tY: i xis i,'�;F.4 � K �v? 0 1 MATCHLINE 1 0 N ■ 11 VI • II ■ 1 t ''.1 1,1:1.'1 4-41 t ti (:1( id .l NORTH ELEVATION rl 1111 SCALE: 1 /8" = 1' -0" : y;,.,.: c;> iT.: iiti :.•`io;`.v;t::::�:rct;.' >:is:.� b: r! 'Lii'�iw:.'!:ti',cs•.':i:ri.�:J' , bars^. `diSln`:aNEN''uSi:�Yt�ii. a C'?ottge. 1tst —ati 0 ;;HLINE MEE 1 1 Val 1 0 11, .1 a, ii iiii t11�N kr .'. 1111 191F. SCALE: 1 /8 = 1' -0° s1'i•JlticCl .:iik`�.k�.s: "w7�� ::; 1. vl; xri:< u%;;'' 3�, i; s' cal�tit? R': ilifi $'r`:tix`h'.catu9.�aLLS.t."'•ur • (Revised hme22,1995) • t'iCeittzt, Affidavitvf-Tublication JUt 2 5 199 27'1995 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF JONG, GOivitviuNi Y DEVELOPMENT Marilyn Peredo being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate daily newspapers, printed and published in Seattle, King County, State of Washington; that they are newspapers of general circulation in said County and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of King County, that the annexed, being a RI classified advertisement display advertisement preprint zulvertisement*, was published in: Gibe Seattle Times D Seattle Post-Intelligencer and not in a supplement thereof and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the errY op 5 regular and entire issue of said paper or papers on the following day or days 11 y 14 gr 7] 1 9c) 5 and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. ' Cltv of Tukwila • . PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice, is given that. the City of Tukwila Planning Corni•-. mission and Board of Archltecu: tural Review will be holding • Public hearing at 7:00 p.m. 09.•.; 'July 27, .1995,4 In the. City., Halt' Council).Chambers.:: located :40L) 6200 Southcenter Blvd. todIscusf, • the, `." P CANN 1 ti61:`Coiliiit AND; BOARD ,!OF;ARCH ITEC TURALiREVIEW-:,PUBL CASE NUMBER: L95,-0931:Co-14) ditional Use Permit .%•?. L,95-0030: Design Review AFTLICANT,: City of.TUkwlice;: REQUEST: :Uieg" Permit.and Design Review a Proval fora new 6,209s41.. g: f1CRf statlofl • LOCATION: 42925.115 Street at, the soUtheast corner at 42nd Ak4e, S. and S.11SthStreetiiTukwym,e4g Persons wishing to.tomment the above cases may.do .so• • written statement0!bY.UP9e0Pi incratthe publIctieartng.:1 mation-on:the above:cases. 3, be obtained at 1110 Tukwila citabid ning ,Division:;rhe;city,,encouv ages! you,to- notifryourone19 bors■:andt-other.persons. yo believe would be affected by„ths1 above it-'1Yr4.:3 • • Number of preprints received Gross drculasion Net circulation MA A iP A P..tfu Subscribed and sworn to before me this Twenty-fourth of 19 95 NAADAWORD-P11995*WORMSTORMIII.SAMtmh 72 0A,(4,0„0C day Ndary Public in for the WU of Wartingtaa nikung d Seattle :f21 • AP F ".L.D A V I T I , (cne_ i2,o(obi ( S Notice of Public Hearing ONotice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B I J T I O N hereby declare that: planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet :Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit 0 Determination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance C Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice C Notice of Action Official Notice Other 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on'71(L. Cor\c i f- f'oicU U(5e Pr rn ; fi Name of ProjectC H4 Of:- J (A.16-VN;lGL. File Number Lct3 - 603 1 Signatur , - AFF.i.D.A.VIT OF DISTitIBUTION V_Iob los In5hereby declare that: Notice of Public Hearing ODetermination of Non- significance ONotice of Public Meeting EBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet DBoard of Appeals Agenda Packet OPlanning Commission Agenda Packet D Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other El Notice of Application for Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on 7/ Lljg .■■••■ UrAl of TL (C\. Name of Project (:_SisaY) (ev lu3 File Number L qs-GQ/D • 44. 33 51 4002 70 DRISCOLL DENNIS P 3944 S 113TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 -1911 33 51 4003 1.5-84. 320 CAMPBELL MICHAEL D CIO TAX TITLE PROP #16619 4001 HILLCREST AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98116 33 51 4005 55 & 575 UNTERSEHER ROSEMARY 4111 S 113TH ST ...TUKWILA WA 98168 -1967 33 51 4007 30 TUSTISON KENT A +ALIDA W 4023 S 114TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 -1914 33 47 4000 30 STEVENS LOUIS A.& ERMA L 4218 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 -1968 33 47 4000 70 SALA ARTHUR L 11624 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 33 47 4001 10 CLARK M VIVIAN 2427 NW NEPTUNE PL SEATTLE WA 98107 33 51 4002 90 EVINGER OLIVE ANN 31662 PASOE RITA SAN JUAN CA 92675 33 51 4005 05 RAMEY CHARLES E 4104 S 114TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 33 51 4006 35 GAVIGLIO ALBERT 4008 S 114TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 -1915 33 51 4005 70 KING COUNTY REAL PROPERTY DIVISION 500 KING CO ADMIN BLDG SEATTLE WA 98104 33 47 4000 50 ADDINGTON ARLENE 4230 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 33 47 4000 85 PHITSANOUKANE SOMMAY 4217 S 116TH ST. TUKWILA WA 98168 -1969 33 47 4001 35 RITCH LLOYD E & DORIS J 11616 42ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 .33 51 4002 95 HELLSTROM & DILLON 211 NW 44TH SEATTLE WA 98107 33 51 4005 20 & 530 JOHNSTON DONNA A '4110 S 114TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 33 51 4007 20 DINGLE HELEN 4115 S 114TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 33 47 4000 05 . DECKER DEAN 11.520 42ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 -1959 33 47 4000 55 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR BNRR PROPERTY TAX DEPT 777 MAIN ST STE 1206. FT WORTH TX 76102 33 47 4001 00 FRITZINGER MERRY 4219 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 -1969 33 47 4015 15 STATE OF WA DEPT OF TRANS REAL ESTATE SERVICES PO BOX 330310 MS 118 SEATTLE WA 98133 -9710 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on July 27, 1995, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I.. PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0031: Conditional Use Permit L95 -0030: Design Review City of Tukwila Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval for a new 6,200 sq. ft. fire station. 4202 S. 115 Street at the southeast corner of 42nd Ave. S. and S. 115th Street, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times July 14 and 21, 1995 Distribution: Mayor, City. Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax. (206) 431-3665 A F F I.D A V I T Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting fBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet .Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: was Determination of Non - significance C Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other to each of the following addresses on �/ /�� lk,01,Palci \tO —7/14 /°lS- "Ti Vikts -7/7-4 Name of Project Ft' (%�, Cj4-01 File Number L"(S- WAD `` Signatur VIM City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on July 27, 1995, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I. PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0031: Conditional Use Permit L95 -0030: Design Review City of Tukwila Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval for a new 6,200 sq. ft. fire station. 4202 S. 115 Street at the southeast corner of 42nd Ave. S. and S. 115th Street, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times July 14 and 21, 1995 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 ift City of Tukvvila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING COMMISSION /BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AGENDA JULY 27, 1995; 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. II. CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 15,1995 and June 22,1995 04\11, COpett L W. PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0031: Conditional Use Permit L95 -0030: Design Review City of Tukwila Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval for a new 6,200 sq. ft. fire station. 4202 S. 115 Street at the southeast corner of 42nd Ave. S. and S. 115th Street, Tukwila. V. DIRECTOR'S REPORT VI. ADJOURN i% re 2 0:. co 0 u� w w 0: lL' Q; v xw z' HO z1-, w w. 0 !-' w W' v w z,: wi z..: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431.3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • PLANNING COMMISSION ' MINUTES JULY 27,1995 Commissioner Stetson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Members present were Commissioners Stetson, Malina, Flesher, Meryhew, Livermore, and Marvin. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Libby Hudson, and Sylvia Schnug. MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 15, 1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. FLESHER SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. FLESHER MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 22,1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Citizens' comments: Jackie Dempere, 4033 S. 128 St. Ms. Dempere discussed the proposal to reduce the minimum lot size in R -1 zoning in the Draft Development Regulations. Ms. Stetson indicated there would be an open house and a public hearing on the matter. L95 -0030: Design Review L95 -0031: Conditional Use Permit Tukwila Fire Station #53 Libby Hudson presented the staff report. She noted that the site is approximately 3 acres. Half of the site is a Class II wetland. The project requires a number of permits including Shoreline and SEPA. There approximately 66 trees existing on the site and half of them will be retained. All of the trees within the wetland and buffer areas will not be disturbed. The project meets all five of the Conditional Use Permit Criteria. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit as submitted. The building is set back 50 feet from the wetland. The wetland buffer will be enhanced with additional trees. The Craftsman design of the building fits in with the surrounding residences. The removed trees will be replaced. There are 33 proposed new trees. The mechanical equipment is under the roof and not visible. The project meets all five • Design Review criteria, therefore staff recommends approval of the design review as submitted. .0 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 July 27, 1995 Mr. Malina expressed his desire for bicycle racks to be placed at the front of the fire station, and a patio area for the fire fighters. Mr. Livermore asked what the statement in the staff report, "The project will provide improved emergency services" means. Ms. Hudson stated that it means that the fire station can handle more hardware and equipment. Mr. Livermore asked if 15 parking spaces is going to be adequate. Ms. Hudson said there will only be eight fire fighters on duty at one time and the. parking seemed adequate. Mr. Livermore asked if there is some flat space between the toe of the hill and the access road. Ms. Hudson said that the road won't cut into the toe of the hill at all. She also stated that a geotechnical study has been completed. Mr. Livermore asked if the concrete slab is adequate to handle the weight of the fire trucks. Ms. Hudson deferred that question to the applicant. Mr. Livermore asked if any recreation areas, such as basketball courts, will be provided. Ms. Hudson said she spoke to the applicant about possible recreation areas and was told that too many fire fighters have experienced disabilities playing basketball. Randy Berg, City of Tukwila Project Manager: He stated that City policy precludes basketball courts due to injuries. There is a patio area proposed, which will be piped for a gas barbecue. Due to budget constraints, they are not able to provide 16 parking spaces for 8 fire fighters. There will be 3 parking stalls for visitors. He added that they received input for the design from the fire fighters themselves. A geotechnical study was completed for the project, and they do not see any problems with the hillside. The access road is within one foot of the toe of the slope. Mr. Berg added they would support putting in bicycle racks for visitors. Mr. Marvin asked where the traffic warning lights will be located. Mr. Berg stated there will be no warning lights. A traffic analysis conducted by the Public Works Department indicated that no warning light was needed at this location. re w2 U O;. co 0 w w; J �> ui 0 ga. u_ —a ui l- g. Z �. D o- O ,ujW v; - O; Z (',. 0 I- z �h. Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 July 27, 1995 g Mr. Meryhew asked if the community has been involved with this project. Mr. Berg stated they held an open house and approximately three citizens attended. The design was available at that time. Ron Thomas, Merritt-Pardini, 1701 Commerce Street, Tacoma, WA: The geo -block is designed to withstand the weight of the fire trucks. This station is being designed as a stand -alone station, with the capacity to have a medical aid vehicle on site. He added they could do something tastefully with bicycle racks. The condensing units, generator and trash area will be located on the east side and screened. Mr. Livermore asked if additional parking could be added in the future. Mr. Thomas indicated they could add parking in the future. Dale Dennis, 300 E. Pike Street, Seattle: He stated that they would do everything possible to preserve the existing trees, . including the large Sequoia tree. There is a wide diversity of plant materials. Mr. Marvin asked if the transformer will be screened. Mr. Dennis said three shrubs will be screening it. He suggested moving the transformer ten feet to the north. Mr. Thomas agreed with that suggestion. Mr. Malina asked where a woman's accommodations would be located. Mr. Thomas stated that the facility is large enough to modify in the future. He reviewed the colors of the building and some revisions to the window patterns to make them look more craftsman. Jackie Dempere, 4033 S. 128, Tukwila: Ms. Dempere stated that the site is actually four acres and not three. This includes four lots on the top of the hill. She wanted the City to preserve this hill site as a view point. On the back of the property is a rock formation, which is where the bike trail is proposed. This is within feet of an archeological site. There were no signs on the site that it was owned by the City or permit were pending. She added that she wants the opportunity to comment on the SEPA, and if she is not allowed the opportunity to comment, she would challenge the SEPA. Ms. Dempere continued by expressing her concern regarding the large fire trucks on these residential streets, and how they will have to take up two lanes when turning. She asked how are pedestrians going to be aware of fire trucks with no signal. Tukwila has z w. O 0. w• ar uJ O • Q: co = v. _: z� o' z tu U 0' = 0 H •_ F- ui z:. U ca - 5 o 'z Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 July 27, 1995 the largest fire truck and she asked how the riverbank is going to be protected from the truck's weight. Another issue is the disposal of hazardous waste. Will hazardous waste be kept at this fire station in a residential area? The proposed pilings will not be sufficient in an earthquake. Tukwila has no historical sites program or funding. Ms. Dempere added that there is a federal law that requires cities to compensate dislocated tenants. She was not aware of the open house for the fire station and this meeting. She is afraid that other property owners are unaware of this proposal as well. She said that she thinks the property would be better utilized as owner - occupied, single - family residences. Nadine Morgan, 5190 S. 166 St, Tukwila: Ms. Morgan said the proposed fire station is very nice. This particular site is of historical significance. This site should be tied in with a seven -acre site owned by King County, which is going to be along the trail because it is the location of the Battle of the North and South Winds, which is a very important legend to the Duwamish Indians. She added that she would like to encourage some recognition of that legend (Beaver Bend) incorporated into the fire station site, as well as a place to sit. This could possibly be coordinated with the Arts Commission. Ms. Morgan continued by saying that Poverty Hill is a significant geological site. The Renton, Boeing and Cascade Bicycle Clubs have expressed an interest of having a bicycle trail extend from 42nd Ave. S., through this property, along the base of the hill or wherever the trail might fit within the wetland, around the edge of the hill to Airport Way. She also mentioned restoring wildlife habitat at the back portion of the property with John Beele's assistance. The old fire station to the south, should be rezoned R -1 and converted to single- family homes, because there is a net decrease of five homes with this fire station. Mr. Berg stated that they would be supportive of any artwork, benches, or plaque that would denote the history of the site. The applicant explored the federal law requiring relocation assistance and the City Attorney indicated they did not have any relocation requirements, but the City did offer each of the tenants $1,000 in relocation assistance. An extensive geotechnical study has been completed for the site. The depth of the pilings will be 30 - 50 feet, and the building is required to be designed to withstand a major earthquake. The preservation of the sequoia tree has been a high priority. There are no current plans to add apparatus to this new fire station, but it is being designed with the intent to grow in the future. This station will not have a hazardous waste team. The hazardous waste team will operate out of Station 51. Ms. Stetson asked if the property had been posted for the SEPA. Jack Pace stated that posting the property for SEPA is not required, but staff did mail a notice of this meeting to adjacent property owners, and advertised in the Seattle Times. 44a: 'efzialliatlieb. OGY.r.Clle 417..W..4.10,11 Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 1995 Page 5 Ms. Stetson closed the public hearing and called for a ten minute break. • Mr. Livermore reiterated his desire to have an expert (geotech) look at the road being that close to the toe of the hill. Mr. Meryhew stated he didn't feel that would be necessary, and that had already been looked at adequately. Mr. Flesher said he thought the geotech would have looked at the whole site and not just the footprint of the building. Mr. Berg said that no borings or soil samples were taken from the hill. The geotech was asked if he thought the hill would need to be examined and went on his recommendation. Mr. Livermore asked if the geotech specifically addressed that point? Mr. Berg said yes. Mr. Livermore asked if the geotech felt it would be safe. Mr. Berg said yes. Mr. Livermore said he didn't have any objections then. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0031, THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE FIRE STATION, BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. MR. LIVERMORE SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0030, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE FIRE STATION, BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS: " 1) WITH REGARD TO CONCLUSION #5, ADD A CONDITION REQUIRING THE APPLICANT TO PLACE A BICYCLE RACK AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE FIRE STATION. 2) WITH REGARD TO CONCLUSION #3, RELOCATE AND SCREEN THE TRANSFORMER. 3) ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL SIGNAGE IDENTIFYING BEAVER BEND, BE FORWARDED TO THE ARTS COMMISSION FOR DESIGN AND LOCATION. 4) THE SIGNAGE PORTION OF THE FIRE STATION SHALL BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FINAL APPROVAL. z tom, JU 00' (ow . w z; J H: w O: g u_ a: �w z�.�. 1.0 z�. N, w w Uf V. O; .z, ,= 0 �' z_- Planning Commission Minutes July 27, 1995 MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Pace noted that there is a ten -day appeal period. Ms. Stetson adjourned the meeting Prepared By, Sylvia Schnug MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Pace FROM: John Jimerson SUBJ: Fire Station No. 53 modifications DATE: March 18, 1996 Here is a list of the changes for the Fire Station #53 proposed to reduce costs, as the project is over budget. I believe these changes do not substantially change the character of the building and are consistent with the BAR approved design. 1. Change of roof material from standing seam metal to architectural grade composition asphalt shingle. The shingle has a thickness similar to wood shakes. Changes to landscape materials: a) Plant lawn rather than Kinnikinnick on the east side of the building. b) Reduce 10 non - required trees from 2" to 1.5" caliper. Most of these trees are north of the building, well away from the street. c) Reduce the size of the pacific wax myrtle from five gallon to one gallon. These are primarily along the east property line, where there are numerous other trees, shrubs and ground cover. Changes to the siding material from wood shake to horizontal lap siding. Removing the overframing from the gabled ends was discussed, however, that would eliminate an important detail from the building design, therefore it will remain. cc: Randy Berg Steve Lancaster • •.tea' i�'a7::ti; iLaS:4`;n +if:r,;;;i .�:.'� a:ilvz i'iQ;b.Y6 ' axi2'i ➢45x :wa-eu ,4nW <a.. ""IME. n mttmNxa Ttfit vramnu. W' -1 U: ••UO. N W;. • • J r i Wo _1 • u.¢ •10 Di ar • W W. M. at.. • iQ -k • ';0 I: W V Lo • :Z Merritt +Pardini Architecture Urban Design Planning Interior Design March 4, 1996 Randy Berg Project Manager City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Randy: James R. Merritt, AIA LeRoy J. Pardini, AIA Gary A. Schaefer, AIA Richard L Ramsey, ASLA, AICP Re: Tukwila Fire Station No. 53 M +P Project #94027.10 Following is a summary of cost saving items presented as value engineering suggestions to bring the estimated construction cost to the level of available funds. This list of items and their estimated cost savings were assembled with input from the design team. Item Revise roofing from metal to heavy duty composition Reduce size of plantings /revise planted area to seeded Change exterior siding from cedar shingles to lap siding Delete overframing relief at gable ends Revise ceiling in Apparatus Bay from GWB to reinforced vinyl Delete casework in unused Sleeping Rooms Delete sprinkler system within building Delete exhaust fan in the Hose Tower Revise Kitchen range hood from custom to high -end residential Total Value $20,300 $10,000 $ 5,500 $ 5,000 $ 2,250 $ 2,000 $12,000 $ 1,000 $ 750 $58,800 1701 Commerce Tacoma, Washington 98402 -3207 (206) 383-8700 (206) 383.8728 Fax 1000 Lenora St. Suite 405 Seattle, Washington 98121 -2720 (206) 223-2742 (206) 622 -9462 Fax Members of The American. Institute of Architects I believe incorporating the above listed revisions would not impact the function of the building. The only item related to building performance is the fire sprinkler system and installation of the underground main would be provided to allow completion of the system in the future. It is, therefore, my recommendation that all the items be included in the revised Bid Documents. Mr. Randy Berg March 4, 1996 Page 2 You have previously mentioned the Board of Architectural Review may desire the overframing be added back on the west elevation only. This would negate some of the cost savings; the west has well over half of the total overframing and would add approximately $3,500 of the savings back into the project. Additionally, both Lee Pardini and I feel the revised scheme without the overframing is cleaner and more pure than the original scheme. We believe this approach represents an overall improvement to the exterior appearance and, therefore, must recommend the revision as presented in Option A Building Elevations be incorporated into the revised Bid Documents. Sinc • . el Charles O'Hern Project Manager cpo.157- 57.94027.00 :�'..�..z 5; *sip:Ya���� -.," .: i. iies:: �a..:::;: xa_ r, 3.:: A. rt; t: x: 2.C. &...::uae�r.::4,,w.,;:0.. >,;�xry a:,si,nrSrc.vL�,.•:::ra.:s:.rr ox.a.e.v..i�., • .a...s.. Meeting Fire Station Date: June 8, 1995 Randy Berg and Ubby Hudson "TrP-P, p2471.,/- Timeline Shoreline- notice published June 2, and set to be published June 9 with 30 day comment period. This way comments can be included in July 27 public hearing Public hearing July 27 Packet to PC- July 20 1 Final Drawing sets for hearing July 13 (color drawings for presentation can wait till 19) Staff report to Jack- July 13 (note- I'll bei on vacation July 3 - 7) Write staff reports - June 20-29 & July 11 - 13 I Complete DesIgnL eLsILJune 1.9 1995 Discussion Items Design Review The design works well with the neighborhood and the site. The craftsman style lends .a rustic feels to the fire station. The roof overhangs help to anchor the building to the ground and site. The siding materials work well with the design and the neighborhood. Refinement of design - entry area- architecturally speaking, there is confusion as to the entry. Generally full length windows are used to denote an entry area, sun space (such as a bank of full length windows) or stair towers. The corner office windows confuse the entry area as viewed from the street and the parking lot. In addition, this length of window does not function well for an office area, unless the area is used as a reception type of area The angle brace is missing in this area also. To further refine craftsman style design and embrace the arch of the building ends, I suggest that this arch be repeated in the angle braces. This ties the design together, juxtaposing the triangles of the roof pitches with the graceful curve of the arch detailing. CO Icor Conditional Use The application is not complete. 'Po e (-Roc. Poxer-i0-0./ Alf■ro ktd4,{ 0 utot-qi 6(t1 Vs--uks ei•r" IPvN UA et. ( 20 ro CorVq\p, (76 Stit)k,o pw 54-6frvo- Ocf D \0L xoa Pooegag •oo •ppue5y. uesuo0 egq uo Tv oaddP ao; eTogm eq ;o eeggTumzo3 aqq oq qT paemao; pue 'gopaquo3 e q eeoadde noA qv isenbea eM 'S661 UT 'Pa bUTTOAoaa %OS eq4 buT4 OUT pagMOq ssaab d uznurrxem eXguz oq XaoL 121,t661 Woa; qao; ;e ;o A4Tn TwOO aAPq oq UPqaodurr PT 4T Teeg eM '$St oq phi ATeTemTxoaddv S M egpa uTTodoaa s euTsnq t66T 94PT ano TPob gvgq buplovea paPMOq sseaboa pooh b Xpuz axe PM '5661 ;o pue eqq iq uoTgonpea'egsPM /buTTolco a. %OS. o TPob.P qes spa dquno0 buTj ;O AlT0 Ou :UOTSTATQ 948 eM PT' oMM 5UTUTquzoo &q pepun; eq TTTM !peen eq TTTM spun; eTTMXny Aquno0 burg e114.. uioa; < siueab 'ZS£'L£$.ao; sT-goPaquoo agy .•saeequnToA „sseuTSng oq. sseuTSng„ pup sesseUTSnq 5 puPgsgno ano so ;, quails uoT1Tubooea P ebPgs oq: uQTd 8M. • u5TgduzPo : pauz .ae edsMeu:.'sgaesuT aeqqeTsmeu . PTA ucgaboad UoTgvonpe /uoTgouzoa• ano enuquoo TTTM eM Se4S M 0T4seTd ;o sedAq agTTurrs egvaeue5 goTUM seen geaPM ao; uzgaboad uoTgpeTTOO eAT4P1ed000 P dOT9A9p •ste TTTM a •seTTddns pup quemdTnbe TPTagsnpUT puP,TTEgea '= quPanvgsea 's e5pupuz &giedoad uo ageA sTgq buTSnOO ;.'spoob pe o& =a ;o asPgoand:pu uoTqOnpaa eqsPM 'buTTOdoaa uT suLTT ;.:O.. 90UP48 =SP TPOTUg094 ep,AOad off. enuTquoo TTTM eM •xa0M 1Pgf ;O sessepons eqq uo pespq a oos P pedoTeAep eA q pug 'eouemao ;aad: aTegq ggTM pesee d ea eM 't66T 4nog5noagq aboad:,,seTOAOe1eseuTsng PTTM3[nf,,, • eqq .2 ; 3[.OM eouvqsTsse TeoTuq 94 peuzao ;aed 'OTgm uzaT; egg '5UT1Tnsu00 PTpeosvo ggTM seDTAaes ao gDPaquo3 a sT •pegpvq Y S6 /6Z /£ gopaquo0 quPVTnsuo3 BuTToRoell sseuTsn meuej :cans Q3u 'aegsPOuP e e g :140213 ee44T1=00 saT TTT411 :OZ Micro Com Systems Washington Ltd. 12608 -B INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WA 98168 TEL (206) 248 -3191 FAX (206) 248 -3313 ATTENTION The next image may be a duplicate of the previous image. Other: Droc i Cie-r Eramsu www.microcomsys.com 05/15/95 16:28 FAX 206 383 8728 MERRITT+PARD IN I rf'4) BOARD OF ARCH!wtCTURAL REVIEW RECEIVED DESIGN r(EVIEW x1395 APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWIL4 0002 DCOMMuNi i y EV DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PMERfY 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206)431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: A 4 2. elt7 tip, Pr. 7N44.e .rraey Ile l=Yr� . ,rrA-r . (2) "407,14471Ar AMYX -r4 *' '4 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) ZoZ fo�.77/ 2,6-° .rr. 7Phivr44, sue} 96/8 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. A_PPLICANT:* Name: ir4r f 721-3f%ri 4 -/1. ,4'c//9- A- - ss: if, 7T -t-,0. // J Atte. /70/ C'rror•Cce Ll eillc�, a ?go 3 -8 .2:;c7 4r Signature: 411 rgi i11 Date: / `1y /-s /99r- * The a -, • licant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to w om all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY .Name: i/7 m, - TVKW, �I OWNER ' Address: I ' N NT24 3e- /0i Phone: 'Av74 .r- I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the &vner(s) or cdt(tract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the • best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 433 ell? z w -QQ J V 0 0• co 0 CO W W I, J f-. C LL: W ga .z . o. z �- :2D. U0 .O ST •0H:. • = 0 tL ~: o w z:. rn! F= 1`: • z 05/15/95 16:30 FAX 206 383 8728 •_BOARD OF ARCHITECTU1'AL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICGION" Page 2 MERRITT+PARDINI 2003 CRITERIA The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to e. criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the trite, If t4 .. space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: p.�/r alY 4044 /N 44Y /rv4 ceir rtACF J./7X ,w' ■%D• 3J /JP fi�lf ( t/ ■iemeie1 /r...9: 01 X,Y. �€.4G /M: 7' 0.V 4latl.slvivi?y Aka, 7ht" /14fRcest'74 7Z.9.v.11 /09/4,B Xeov/.0iiVi A'V Di' C1 d/ effv44nm✓ .lba -701. /02X' .107 / f1.tif.: i /S97 f ,4411;0477/1/ i' 'ca,erf ddb•vt!' /4/434./C L.E✓ AVd "F 1%'4 Vf 7 /4s ii' ie P T ,716. A-Aers /7, iu , .rc T .et,i - '1 z-e -' t.r ./2/640s" "•Y ,kvvb yT- ooz..yv 3224/1404$9-r f ..rov irlA✓r /PifG/c �/A-A/FAA 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: 7h0 ,/Iffie✓G1/4 ' 77& 41/ /GOU✓G /.r A 72 A ∎•l /I v714L /Ass/ armor/ -l.,E 7lJ 711.E 4#0.4.7Arr ,6x3wN7-' s /0l.E (49 A%c.asea0 47,4v4 h4 a iv /.ot1lrlf- , ev/ rms/r3) rl i9 p ?b A� T. ,54c✓i-✓77 me 461re, 3 Y iier7h1 7 . ril„fea4Vao/N6 4,4€400/ . .rr�ivzr�J 4V /7Y. c � c-7 /00,0er,Ai�/ 44exe'i .417 / 1t A/0.410 14 //r 7.- iwa 77' M'J'n'i /fte.r4v( 4 /14X,r/A4 # .rr i .r &r 4c,N F.�c� Jii'Z%F/r ?b �°oyj'G� 7A5E 44640Witir A'ovvuoc/T e, e-AotfG1L/,7'0X 1A0 ''IJ /.dp.E At/ wordy- .0.9Aer7itY IRE AvAdAcf yr it/-44A/04 05/15/95 16:31 FAX 206 383 8728 MERRITT+PARDINI 2004 -.BOARD OF ARCHITECTU"4L REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW. APPLIC`ON Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should.promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important a axis, and provide shade. 1- z D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, 6 D' mitigating steps should be taken. - o E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in. paved areas is encour- c co o co al aged. w z' F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- co w: plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be 2 o'- effective in winter and summer. IL a G. In areas where general planting will not prosper; other materials such as fences, walls, and v2 d pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. i w. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- z �; scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the z o. building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive .2 11.1 D uj D brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. o N; of RESPONSE: w w; i/fO l z_ ._� /fi�.E /GEC /< l /LN /fi/c�bVT //vA1E� o, iC F' v F-. w o; U u'' 1= z'. 0 z 6/7�9T7 P�/ 71 OU�if/l 7 1i�E .j/l. $T /IS Q.E' .e.eorfr■virip 7l7 r r " `b-/rmee. 77/0 sorry- - ,i0e Acro- Apentpv or i s.7x A/cL /00414w A-r it/DveA 2 ,4r /1 A fA6` / /10 /c,4/vf .ert'' dW bps w 77is- i '7 ax' _Vr1 S./7Z !di} /c/y an' ' r ,4 fp 4G .'Cd4iErii1/ /Nc., <ea 4 77ArAc Aitm ewie - MC e-i 7a 7PAE Lc% •I 771z' -_xze77/t/ . /077s0frvpd- yx4 /T4'l7D/ 4�waF: .ti, ese�Fi svT f, av .771Z- ,4iL y. 1 fro' 771 7 ‘vE J 1-I3wOr 41°1/.15%e-4'e/4 isorZa ,O.E /021.740e so Ti1•i N ,t c4( »,v) z earilMo eyu.euB . r-c wiz !,E fee~ .040 -TRE J ,7/) /Ved•f 7Y L✓■v.E ,4 dE.coe,i7Y/. .e'rY/, ' Lx7 E /Ag. G/il ll�v4 At , tAe ' 7 I4 G/ iCTY AO/ .r 7.01/“.4:r s:1 Av./ ice✓ /%/�9sV1 *'A' /I ,K07- ,01,44e-77,,V4 fide 4c,&vr ri tIr3,Ese7/. G /bHJ7,0 ,4444 ,rrvr tw46 7ft1 4!ah,XG7t )4a iyz S 410' T v /eE AolfeA f A41 i Yl ✓ ,V+ &..1fr riOE ma 7 44c/4/1Y Ate( -reAc. vE ' f4repov ~eve v/ 7p me gege, 7' 4. BUILDING DESIGN o- 7 f1XPc7 g. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to,appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. 05/15/95 16:32 FAX 206 383 8728 - _BOARD OF ARCMITECTUHAL FitVItW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC: �`iON MERRITT+PARD I NI 005 Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: .ei//1..iowef ,044 /A/ii /✓ ,'Egeol 'eat, tP ffEj 147 t Aiyiefee /ovr.✓/dc,A• 4.V.0 .sc0466•2/i/� yOLvM.E .•4ef . A /L/7Y .t Z " afel 2 atkEr, ,1ivo ?h yr 4.64 /A/d if ate e�► 4i 77/E , L /G r /�4E✓ frvccr4 '44.E .Vv/X YZ t/c ��ee fink 4' 1'774/ZEV Tc igeoie40,4= ..pro/#/i7r64/c/ wing 7105*- ✓oefia4140" /.v4 AW'i fa✓',basw .C800 1412441,g,y Av17/1/4/ F- 4cAgle .17fbvoiAii‘ 41.4of .0<ore 44ov~ "cam L W4 1Wieoei ..00%.4.4f/d-/ 7X G'o�cam! w /cc A.E "t4 ise w/aY/ •97,/ ;VIE 1exeou+V+v d leerDW • J- 277∎14. ,I/,E GY 4- 6' Vdd+V /cr3L . / /•4A..rt/7 ot,ILL .aft- 'z 'P ,' S6'€ ` /0.dd. e9WO.ee✓r4v dN /Ts" /ow- ere eK � /ceafrt rtegle `'/.61.■. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: A4e'L /7Y ✓76/v /4 vo ✓,l i4L . , Sl //f/! i 'GAGED/ .4,66//J.Jsp/,V S _7f e A44 /L /TY ,feciesrymov .rc, 41 L /4/917444 A.Y44 „�iv /•,s" Oil A4. ft,44 d--/.04. L L✓ /G4 ALt' .E GYM T eatf .�{ F�4. S/f�14/ 0/0e0..471ie" Ti ff le/ /LL A.f0 ,F/ViOIV4E x fta re4 w •j U: C.) o: CO O' !Si w; w� g- w a; co a I- o'. z� 2 o' w IU • _ • Z. —, /— 0 .. File: L95 -003 mm •Drawing# > 4,-1,4Y1:':'u`�.]FN: wv�iitkMat t. iiliii_: �tK' 1�. G+f•': e+ 1. A.? e)]. tiv+. w: a2. 4n' n:p�YGi14::F.Y'Y�iSl +vytArS...r nuu A:w6 .tuki.+ia°auir.110,: ^pia . . File: L95 -00 5mm Drawing# .;%:,:tt::`�G�L'i'•' "s:,w "� .. r.. sG:; i::l n' uia;: Ka :;•�. {:'vn.cs.i�utiiciiei�la7d �ritie ".i:T�uwu�.29.;:ntdY,�iu�as�c rY3ti� �_... Ey'w,f j:t.:w;J?w.uEr6• aY rit.v�u. d;.nw mm Drawing# Fd 1/2' R & G IN 19622 0:05Sand0.04EofCor. 12/28/94 Fd //2' R k C NE tor. Lot 21, ilk. 25 CJG. LS1.19622. 0.44 W of Line N 7512•25' w 20.19 Fd 3/4' 1P NE Car,' Lot 25, Blk. 25 1.11 S and 0.30 E of Cor 1 16. 8 22 ///---Top of 48' Concrete / Pipe. Elev. 11.43' N 06W'3.5. l 530.44 Toe 14 O6'Cattonwood ------ — - -_1_12-Cottonwood 2'Cottonwood 40.00 11111eSequola. 12 Alder 3 0 14AIder 8Alder 24'Cottonwo d ¥0'Alder 42nd Avg ottonwood 24'Cottonwoo ttonwood C1 tl 2'O0'12' R- 17188.74 L- 601.04 3 Cottonwood 3 141,1ag olio Trees 4' Magnolla (es East End of l8' \ "Concrete Pipe \ Could Not Find Outfo ll„, \• Cyclone Ditch `3.11' Encroachment '-2.70' Encroachment 1.67' Encroachment .4 st " -3:65' Encroachment 3.85' Encroach From Fence to Plat Line Iii ICI 1(1 let Ili ill 1�I 111 III Ijl I1I I�I 111 i(1 11I 111 ICI I�1 I�1 I�I I�I I�I.I.II..III I l�,l 1, 12I III 3I I 14� , .5I I 16 `I OIC 6I7, 8I2' L�Z; _OIZ 77 • 1' i'.IZ 71 11 or at 8I1 Llt 9I1 1111 uuhm mdmi uuluuluuluii milmi mdiiii mdmi uuluu uuluu iui6m miluu uuluu mdiiii uiduu mdu Lfmaisssoriatlan Lots 1 to 15, Inclusive, Block 28; Lots 1, to 12, Inclusive, Block 27; Lots 1 to 15, Inclusive, Block 28, A11 M C.O. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No, J, According to the Plat thereof, Recorded In Volume 12 of Plats. Page 8e, In King County Washington. TOGETHER with the East half of 42nd Avenue South; Also TOGETHER with South 114th Street;" Alsa TOGETHER with South 115th St est, Lying within said Plot. • -24 "O ,, 46, Cyclone Fence SCALE: 1'.30' 0 15 JO 60 P Mailbox 0 Found Iron Pipe or Rod & Cap, IS Set Rod A: Cap ow Watormeter 1:141 Fin Hydrant P Power Pole 1 Power Pole with Transformer 1 a�2 LeJ 00 Anchor Water Meter Wetlands Flag Catch Basin Sob Log Tre., as noted This t P DOES NOT REPRESENT A RECORDED,_.8.OVNPARY SURVEY 745-- 000 • ' : RECEIVED ,.11-1 95fa FEB 2 4 1995 t 1495 PUaLIC J K8 • DESIGNED SCALE DRAWN ET CHECKED APPROVED HOR. VERT 30 BOOK x'119 PC. ,1 Jos NUMBER IRWIN ENGINEERING 10193 CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING DATE 824 SOU1i1 28th 405 1i 2_7_95 TACOJW, WA 98405 Phone (206)272 -7891 Boundary d: Topographic Survey of C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition /3 For The City of Tukwila DRAWNC NUMBER D10193TP ' . SHEET 1 OF 1- • q i