Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L95-0060 - SOUTHCENTER GOLF - DESIGN REVIEWL95 -0060 SOUTHCENTER GOLF 18791 SOUTHCENTER PY DESIGN REVIEW City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared November 2, 1995 HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER:. APPLICANT: REQUEST: November 9, 1995 L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Mr. E. Linardic Board of Architectural Review approval of revisions to a previously approved building design. LOCATION: ACREAGE: On the west side of Southcenter Parkway, approximately 1/4 mile south of the S. 180th Street intersection in the SW 1/4 of Section 35, Township 23, Range 4. Assessor Tax Lot No. 352304 -9015 (south portion). Development area is 13.04 acres of a 22.62 acre parcel. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: R -A A Mitigated Determination of Non - significance was issued on April 12, 1994. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Staff Report to the - L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Board of Architectural Review Page 2 ATTACHMENTS: Al. Overall Site Landscape Plan Bi. Partial Site Landscape Plan of Building and Parking Areas Cl. Site Grading and Storm Detention D1. Building Elevations Note: Colored elevations to be presented at the hearing. El. Perimeter and Hitting Station Ball Containment Netting Fi. Previously BAR Approved Design Gl. Illustrated Site Plan Revisions* Hl. Illustrated Building Elevation Revisions* I1. Cumulative Development Conditions * To be presented at the hearing. Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Page 3 1. Project Description: The applicant generally proposes to retain building location and overall building envelope, but modify its design. This would result in an increased building area from 15,168 to 18,360 s.f. (3,192 s.f.) and increase hitting stations from 60 to 71. The building area increase seems to result from: a. additional usable second floor space, within the building envelop, due to a new stepped roof line and a 2 -3 ft. increase in building height. (see BAR Criteria No. 4 below) and b. incorporating a 40'x20' outdoor area into the 2 story building (1,600 s.f.). More specific descriptions of building design changes are presented in BAR Criteria No. 4. Minor changes to the parking lot have also been proposed. The proposed project design is shown in att i € s ou '> The previously approved project design is shown in t in t Major design revisions are presented in attachments ? ` 2. Background: This project was previously approved by the Board on April 28, 1994 (L94 -0009) and a conditional use permit being approved by the Planning Commission on that same night (L94- 0005). Revisions to the previously approved design are proposed to increase site use efficiency and economic feasibility, in a mariner which continues to satisfy Board design criteria. The Board established that the proposed design changes would require additional design review (9/28/94). In this submittal, the applicant proposes that the design changes maintain the previously approved design approach, satisfy the Board decision criteria, and should be approved. The staff evaluation has focussed on the impacts of proposed changes and affected impacted project elements, on project design quality. This approach recognizes a certain level of "legal vesting" established by the previous design approval for unaffected design elements. The proposed project design must be reviewed based on its consistency with BAR design criteria. It is not appropriate to base a decision on whether it is, or is not, better design than the previous design. 0' U w uj. CO LL uJo g u_ a. = a; ~_.. z �. zp, uji u: E-' • W I V' • Z. 0 Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review DECISION CRITERIA L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Page 4 Project design revisions have been determined to affect BAR criteria 1 (Relationship of Structure to Site) and 4 (Building Design). These Board review criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. The remaining BAR criteria are adopted by reference from the original staff report which was adopted by the Board The basis for a Board decision is whether the revised project design satisfies the decision criteria. 18.60.050: General Review Criteria. (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. The relationship of structure to site is unchanged except for: i. reduced building width along the western half and ii. partial replacement of the trellised outdoor area with increased building width. Minor parking and sidewalk design changes have also been proposed. (4) Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated hfe of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. Building design revisions such as the stepped south elevation roof, additional window accents, and roofing over the hitting stations, are proposed to maintain the previously approved residential or country club design orientation. The Board supported this design orientation to enhance harmony with western wooded g. Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Page 5 hillside and the northerly ball field and llama pasture. This design is further supported by the colors and materials, which have been retained except that the green window glass is proposed as clear. The following NEW design elements have been proposed to avoid design monotony on the various building elevations, integrate design changes with the previously approved concept, and otherwise satisfy Board criteria: South Building Elevation: i. A rhythm of first and second story windows and (hemispherical) fan light windows at the entry gables, ii. Placement of the second story windows at the new roof break to integrate that space into the first floor design, iii. Intermediate sized building extensions on the east and west building ends to provide relief, North Building Elevation: iv. Extending the roof over the hitting stations and establishing a central gable to emphasize the previous residential /country club design orientation and provide a central focal point, The north elevation will be significantly affected by the ball containment nets at each hitting station on the second floor. Nets will initially extend 13 feet out from the hitting station, but may be extended up to 20 feet as needed to contain all golf balls. v. The extensive windows behind the hitting stations provide some architectural interest, East Building Elevation: vi. A 10 ft. building extension provides visual relief as viewed from the street, while the extensive glass window provides architectural interest, This extension is important to off -set the additional wall area due to extending the second floor hitting stations. West Building Elevation: vii. No significant change. �1— W; 0 0= CO O' vow. W • J j-' w0 tar. 1 w • o; z g.. W w: j 0 0 w' H i- z; : 0 Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Page 6 CONCLUSIONS 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The previous conclusion determined that the proposed landscaping provides adequate transition to the small building street facade and softening of paved parking areas. Staff concludes that the proposed revisions do not change the original conclusion. 4. Building Design: The previous conclusion determined that building design is sufficiently harmonious with the surrounding area, especially given the architectural features along the street facade, the large amount of remaining open space, and the surrounding unadorned industrial developments. The proposed design contains different specific elements, but maintains the same overall design theme. Staff concludes that the proposed revisions do not change the original conclusion of satisfying this criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Division recommends approval of the proposed design revisions. This evaluation and recommendation shall supplement previously approved materials. A complete list of development conditions and their status of completion is presented in C tJ ,,..iicr�naAkti Staff Report• to the Board of Architectural Review L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Page 7 ATTACHMENT F1 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR DESIGN City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCIHTECTURAL REVIEW Prepared April 15, 1994 HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETER1VENATION: April 28, 1994 L94 -0009: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Chris Bennett Rick Beeler, Director Board of Architectural Review approval to build a 60 station golf driving range with 100 parking spaces on 22.62 acres. On the west side of Southcenter Parkway, approximately 1/4 mile south of the S. 180th Street intersection in the SW 1/4 of Section 35, Township 23, Range 4. Assessor Tax Lot No. 352304 -9015 (south portion). Development area of the parcel is 22.62 acres. Light Industrial R -A A Mitigated Determination of Non - significance was issued on April 12, 1994. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax. (206) 4313665 Staff Report to the ' Board of Architectural Review L94 -0009: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Page 2 ATTACHMENTS: A. Overall Site Plan and Vicinity Map B. Partial Site Plan of Building and Parking Areas C. Overall Landscape Plan D. Enlarged Landscape Plan of Building and Parking Areas E. South Elevation F. East, West and North Elevations Note: Colored elevations to be presented at the hearing. G. Site Sections A and B (showing relationship of project to the street). H. Street Elevation (showing the streetscape of netting and landscaping) *1. Sample of Protective Netting (to be presented at the .hearing) . J. Colors and Materials Board (to be presented at the hearing) K. Cross - Sections of Hitting Stations L. Window Trim Detail * M. Applicant Responses to Board of Architectural Review Criteria N. Typical Road Section, "57th Avenue 'Preliminary' Design/Location Report," City of Tukwila, 1989 O. Environmental Mitigating Conditions Q(. (C4 �cf X S( t\! P-r(oNi ` Q . Low C2oo"11 frl,or4uM T S f`g orT7cy tv R , pgo <os aF pRO OS %T "A(C TO -1 e kvicti ,A3 Ce Fop_ Re OPOAi. g_60. J GrS 1 A. < M!3' I (.2_s---(Fs- -6, i4 c e_ 1-EG�Iq-n -1 A(G • Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. L94 -0009: Tu... ila Golf Driving Range Page 3 FINDINGS Project Description: The development area is 13.04 acres of a large parcel containing 22.62 acres. The development area includes all building, parking and landscaped areas. In the development area, 1.39 acres would be parking and building area (i.e. the impervious surface area) while the remainder would be landscaping and a golf driving field. The development area is sited on the flat valley floor, adjacent to the wooded valley wall. It is separated from the valley wall by a stream. The required 15 to 30 foot wide stream buffer areas are maintained. The applicant proposes to build a driving range containing a 15,168 s.f., two story building with 60 golfing stations and supported by 104 parking spaces. A net fence 50 to 75 feet high will run 30 feet in from the ultimate property line along Southcenter Boulevard. The net will be a thin mesh (sample to be submitted at the hearing), which will be screened by a double row of poplar trees. The project is shown in attachments A through L. Environmental mitigating conditions have been established for this project through the SEPA process (L94- 0004). These conditions have been identified in Attachment 0 and have been assumed to be part of the proposed project. Existing Development: The development area is currently pasture for llama grazing The remaining parcel area will be a wooded valley wall, grazing and a single family residence. Surrounding Land Use: Surrounding uses are light industrial warehousing/light manufacturing to the east, a heavy construction equipment yard to the south, steep wooded valley wall to the west, and pasturage with a single family house to the north. The Green River runs about 600 feet to the southeast. Access: The site is accessed through Southcenter Parkway. This two lane road is planned for expansion to a five lane road with sidewalks and landscaping. The five lanes will use all 60 ft. of public right -of way and roadside frontal improvements will have to be placed on additional right -of -way or an easement for sidewalks /utilities/landscaping. Utilities: Provisions to serve the site with sewers and upgrade the water line have been made in the SEPA process. fj: " ..:is�.�i.. 41ca:'. ^;t+wiS;ti'r'tlsti��a;a ilacSiii "iJ4sA.eC'a.*l�:tia:,x` v�k:. dLw4"i.Y.k.+.�us nww.�..v, F.a:n�.•• Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review BACKGROUND L94 -0009: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Page 4 This project is being reviewed for consistency with Board of Architectural Review criteria, as part of a conditional use application (L94- 0005). Evaluating project design quality is an integral part of conditional permit review. The applicant, in anticipation of being asked to evaluate the project with respect to B.A.R. design criteria, has submitted this information for simultaneous review. DECISION CR11ERIA Board review criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. Applicant responses are presented in Attachment M. 18.60.050: General Review Criteria. (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to . provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Building/Parking Area Transition to the building/parking area is provided by a 15 -20 foot wide landscaped strip, which is planted with 'large stature deciduous trees (Attachment D). The 18 to 24 ft. high, 15,168 s.f. building is a very small portion (2.7 %) of the development area (Attachment A). It is insignificant when compared with the industrial developments to the immediate east. The parking area is softened by the trees in the surrounding landscape perimeter and interior landscaped islands about every 10 stalls. Driving Field Area The most potentially visible element in this project is the 50 to 75 foot high net which would enclose the driving field (Attachment A). The perceived intensity of site development will depend upon the net's visual impact. The applicant describes the net as being almost invisible because of its fine mesh, and the screening from the road provided by the double row of poplar trees (attachments C and H). A sample of the proposed net and a photograph of an existing installation will be presented at the hearing. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L94 -0009: Golf Driving Range . Page 5 character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terns of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. The 18 to 24 ft. high building has the low building profile, pitched roof and wood siding of a residence or "country club." This orientation is supported by its setting which retains an extensive amount of open space and landscaping. The architectural orientation is most pronounced along the street facade where open trellis work, an 18 ft. high roof peak and extensive angles in the pitched roof have been incorporated. The development area's building design (see above) in an open field and landscaping, is similar to the pasture and residential use to the immediate north. However, it is smaller in scale than the 24 ft. high, concrete industrial buildings to the east and heavy equipment yard to the south. Here again, project harmony rests on the net's transparency and screening. All site access is via one driveway from Southcenter Parkway. Pedestrian access is not now provided to the street. However, the on -site sidewalk system could be linked to the future area -wide system by extending the sidewalk along the driveway area to the street. Measures to promote the integration of site circulation with the area -wide street and pedestrian circulation system would include provision of frontal roadside improvements such as sidewalks, curbs and gutters in a 10 ft. wide easement. This has been discussed in the conditional use permit staff report (L94 -0005) and required as an environmental mitigation measure (Attachment 0). (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, fic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sires limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and futures should Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L94 -0009: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Page 6 be of a deign and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The wooded hillside back drop has been preserved as the setting for the golf driving range. Plantings have been proposed to accent the building, soften the paved parking area, and screen the safety net. Exterior lighting in the building/parking area will be shielded and moderated to avoid all direct and indirect, off -site glare. • The driving field is proposed to be lit by fixtures mounted 50 ft. high on the net poles along the eastern perimeter of the field (i.e., on the road side of the project). The lights would face the hillside and shield the road from direct glare. However, off -site indirect glare and some level of "stadium halo" is possible. All off -site glare should be avoided as discussed in the conditional use permit staff report (L94- 0005). The normal standard to implement the "no off -site glare" standard is 0 to 3 lumens at the property line for all other commercial and industrial developments. • (4) Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated hfe of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Frierior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The building has a residential or country club design and setting (see Criteria 2). This design orientation is further supported by the colors and materials which consist of a deep green metal roof, wood wall siding with brown accent strips on a beige field, and green glass. The variety of vertical and horizontal modulation helps to avoid building wall monotony and provide visual interest. This level of building relief should be viewed in light of its relatively small size, the large surrounding field, and the amount of landscape screening being provided. Staff adopted this approach especially in the review of the 220 ft. long strip of driving stations along the north elevation. The proposed roof overhang and spare . eFt',i >Z^:rs[i:f� :ai :i?.F"!yfs ''�Ktu Ni n'a.W.040"'r17ian "AGSfftS, 'fi t „ : : :✓'d'!ts,� se*. , '•w..: , rs vim: :,,�.. -.w, • 3 Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L94 -0009: T—.;vila Golf Driving Range Page 7 pattern of driving stations was judged sufficient due to the large open field and the double row of poplar trees which would separate possible viewers from the building. No mechanical equipment has been shown. However, any such facility should be screened in an architecturally integrated manner. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture re ILI2 The miscellaneous structures being proposed are the dumpster screen, a 10x12 ft. 0 g ca maintenance building near the hillside, and business signage (to be presented at , W; the hearing). All structures appear to be architecturally integrated with the main j building design. • 1. w 0 g g CONCLUSIONS a,. _d. I- al z�. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The proposed landscaping provides adequate I-- O z�. transition to the small building street facade and softening of paved parking areas. w Based on a review of the applicant's information, staff has concluded that the net's 0 N'i: visual prominence would be adequately minimized ;o UJ ILz I--. U 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: The proposed development I=' _ must satisfy the following conditions in order to achieve harmonious area lii z integration: v N: a. the frontal roadside improvements are provided as discussed in the conditional use staff report and as required in the environmental mitigating conditions (see Attachment 0) and b. a sidewalk to link the on -site walk way to the future area -wide system is extended along the driveway. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment: The .proposed Landscaping adequately accents, softens and screens the development area. Exterior lighting design has not been finalized. Final designs should be completed prior to issuance of a building permit and demonstrate avoiding all off -site glare as discussed in the conditional use staff report and required as an environmental mitigating measure (Attachment 0). • .W.... .*-. e., .:w.r..e,Mtbw+.c:hwa,�.ii:.wc Yi..uiL Ydr�ici :+:1051.{"e::5`':9ilS'fit4 ;Fdiaatmiv • Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review fin L94-0009: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Page 8 4. Building Design: Building design is sufficiently harmonious with the surrounding area, especially given the architectural features along the street facade, the large amount of remaining open space, and the surrounding unadorned industrial developments. No information has been provided on HVAC and utility hardware. All such facilities should be screened in an architecturally integrated manner. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: The proposed miscellaneous structures are sufficiently similar in architectural design, materials and colors to the main building. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Division recommends that the project be approved subject to: a. Extension of the on-site pedestrian sidewalk along the driveway, to the future area-wide sidewalk system, and • b. Screening of all HVAC and utility hardware in an architecturally integrated manner. . ,• • • • P-aL• • • - n Cr- • ,r) ' "."- • ' • - .ar 4••••••• ca ••••-• •C•es, 4.41• 4.4.• ..•••• ••••4 /O. .•••••.• R./. we*, ,tICA 0/212 C....14 ..r.• 1.111 C.,•••••••••■•2 • Vat, J11 •••• • • 2, ••:•• /11 •••, 274 J••• 20.1.0 se• F. •. e•••••••14.1.:: .••••■ a•••••• c.••••■•• . ee 4•••• • ,.••.7...1 • ...rec.. •••••••,..,) . • • eor.;.....;•••..4 C4.4- 4,-.A./44 • Ct..••••••■•. •••/, V.4.4 .10 42 . ••• • ,•••• ••■••• • •v (44,1, •••••&) • 14,1 ••••••••••••••tl •••••••••‘..... 3.•••••:. Mir,. • • .04 • . or••••••• 41 ...cr...., •• ••••.) 32 .0 •• • ••••2•.• • • •••: •••• ••••••.....h.ar •• • 1.-ErGE'eva .o• . do.-$7,c CI:4,0, -,_ LT J c IMMO •••■••• 40)1 .1. ••••••••••••••••••••.-4 a' • ....dr - • •••--- ••• •••• 2•••••••••••e.V .....••••••.•.•/ -L.% • • t• • 4.) e .144.4.44.4 4,..■••••■••• LAke•••••••• •—••••• • — >aeS,./ .• • .r•' e.:.• 1. - 1. le •• • ti 14 ....weer 10 • • •■• • • •••■ os. 11 • 2.7.•0 ••• (Hi • J1 1 t ' t I, .,,1• ,'. .:-?..--'..;.. ---'•-'.. : 'Ir 1., •. .. p: • 1. ..11TC , . \ v/c/A // ,..1.4■••• 1. T41. 1444. 1371,..1 I ••I. •...L. II. Afrp.“.10 37 1•1.....I.10.46...• 4,0 • 1,1 ■••••••••. • -4 •• •••••••• ••• • • II sl 1,1 1._! f,t -11L! Ili! ;11111) ,v. • ' i; ; L • _ 41.••• --‘-t-:•7.77.1\....V••• • Ur!! `'•-• .5.;.t -14 • • Nof . •jr • ;•••• • / .••••• .41 SC G. sr l• CO' #211 ••41_1_. „Srra" PL._. A /V ■ •• fro,' ••••••,,,,,••• •••• ••••:, 4; 1! '1 ! 1.. (%-.4 PI; ...... i: -. 4..--r.:..- - I 4 74. , 1. ........... I • '`,...2 1. . • ••,:•• C• ....•••• • ••••-'. . I . . ...• • • ..• .. • .... \ .• . ... 1 • • . •1 • . .t ••••• .....ra 4.r...........4 •,-..-• •••••••V ' .. / / 1. •.. f. , i .4 -;, — • , - .1V - i IL. . '..7....:;1"."` ■•••••-•.; ..2..V./ 4/4.. "'A. 4..ralT r...............,. •, a• • ------------ .. 1 0;14 • ....C../ .••••• .43 .1.,......1. i'F;tr."----- - 1-7-L.:77.-:.! 1..1.-,'ar.,F -- -.-1--------. h--.....- ..., . • • . • , .. ....., -. 14.11s 1•• , 4 1 ••• • C. ------.,.-.---r- : . t. ... .., r ■ I —• I 4:744 040.42.4.44 TAN te 14;4. • ..... Z95-004v • • Ow" 1/4 ..... ..... T. 44:•••"7" • :-.•^.^;;;••• .0•,/••• GV••••S Ilf Ar. 5C4C'E./ 1.16-CRWO 40 ■■•• ./.41/00/ •.• •••• 4,•.•••..0 1: s : 1. eat Firb.l. 0'41..1 to T44. gini.I6 0.11 141 i .., . ..0.0...21,,...........r.„ ,...;.■..........>„.............-....-1,........„ . ,.....,,•.....,,...raere .,,..111.„./...., ;.,"..:::„...J., ...-r......c J /W.< /........ . • .. ...'••••'....• : ...... . ........ /.. / .s.''''./nr•.' .1....:-.'..'';'77......'.::':: .. ; ..... .....r.i..rr....:Sr...................-:::: ... i / / / / • f :" ....,.....-44.-... ..................„•-••■ 7 7 - / ./'...15.:,...., ..• ..• .„.4.- .**•..::::.:.„, -- ••".....-...-- q fr. J PII,C•L.W . •••• •••:::■•••■■■....,,- ......, e 1 / 4> . , ..„ • .. /,,/ /,' .;>;,%-• .• .., • / / / C ••-•••••.• 4...te ..4• •Ce i.en..4... ',b.. ,./5..r. .. • /''' - ....sr.,. /.4.••••• .y..0,4. ..47. ••••--.-". ••••; / WSI.1.10,,,A. 1174 Cos f.. AdonaT 11.. T. 41 4.or • 1.. ... .cv,0”.•C : 1,10 ro ACJAC: fr (...o) nolfi /4 GA ./ • • . (..e. 2......••• ; ti --• - - - -:"---..: / ...49 ..,.. .. •• ••• , „..„,......,,, •,.. 0 ....'' ...-.".' ••.' • • / , / r....•or • • . ,,,, „.., ,f, " ; • ..C7r.r•C.S • A et• .1 A I_ / E" L_ /\/ Lfortres ■•.••••••••••••"•••••••11.1.1*.A. • -PLANT LIST , 0.0•••■11=4• C.440•••• •••■ p• 14100.0 14...wo. • ICIACIPCOIARY V** 1.4.4. V - • 14. 011 ■ MT, AMA N1104•4 le* 1......11•010,010 3 ..■ 0ye C. 44 WO 0 14.40 IP. 01101411•111INTS.A/4710:4 N.4.■••• t.... .4 law • 1 .• 3 W. C. in 1100. Wad lo. 1.01•111.40 NON • baaa• ... 40:••■ IN 1••••••■ V - 10 14 Id IV 00. POLULSIIINT00141/440•14 10.4.4104 9. . IT - IV N. OS 20 0 C. 141. 0.41, rfor,COlivammarno• • r-r 40 SS NV 0 C. M. Y., , nira•oCCcultwo ry.••••••• MS.. FUN.. 11• 100. /V.V../ . 1.4410.• 04.104.10 01 XfOC. &CAL.., ••••••••11.1.4 Coant MI 1110C. 1.4.1•/0.4 411044111.07•3•1044.4 0o4Nrw• , 1404.4111404.0444 IV - El •)11' 1141 1100. 1.4 ' 0.41111111NIA . :1• 'OM o 4.... 100 ...... . 11 - /V /0 a 100. 1 4 , 6.4" 0044.4 MW* la •0. 44q 9.4 11 ■ VI' h. 1 OC. AA .0101.0114 IV • WIN .0 40 0. 3 C0140 rm., L 1,44• 0 up.4a4 1I• - NI 11 e roc. NA *04.0 10 . •4014..t 19. ■ aria. .0 COM . NA , ' 70101:10.11040 11,41.a•• •■•••• 944.41.41•■•••• 39-399* NI V 0 C. FA (T.■•••••••110.1A1/.011.•Con••.N. 10.4 Gen., No.. le ■ 111,4. NI 100. 1..4 i • : . . ,; ,)1.1.1.2A 1■■•■•• IP.."4, Pup. Ikano. Au.. 19■1191 SO roC. br ;`),,,:.:,;,11010•141COVIL11. • 111•••0 II. T. aria so ,OC Ns . HLI.410140. INIT." 1•Y ■ I (011 I' 0 C. MO`, ••••...• •• 94' ••• -NT4N..1 90 ••••0•••,C.A• •40 I c •rovetoco...o. T •1. •• (19. 4i.ti049.. Arrp•.y. 74'01,.J.• ••,/ r•• .0.h9rl•fil. orsliorerd SfSrirr y• alf•141,6 (Jr. rritt.:1 tte41.1. ' b • rt.1.0005101,CA Mitt rir•NI 40...za& tuei.mt4 • I ',0A14, ft 0, 1PN 4.44167 ge-'0% • 6' fortiLus 01G1-4 F 10 . 09.109004. •044.441.7910 • r tVI•501146 1411111 18 • •1110 J• 1,4N TA z 0 It riCWoOT3U4A • OriONIMI1040 110. MIL:WO rill•rA""1"" • - • 04:9.:.vvf ........ .................................................................. 4000 wi-Ps ..•■• at .•••01/ r • (.■• 4 £CCSP.0 ••444/414310 ATTACHMENT C c9 7? L A"./. 0 CA 1=W- JC 00' ••••••,,, ••.• - 11.0••••••■•••04.01•1144111.40 • K-TTL: 400 04-449.1a1.511.0 i1*9.1004Aer r■-••• I roc. LOGATVW 6t Ay 04/ 1.1404011 ALL 49C-ocrasto 4 LBGBNO vEC•O✓o ✓. rarr r1 •/l.n•C+rrM 'volt Sr • W 2 U H •1' 10 • T aCC.10. 91• LN •PAS •■MLf9' 03rbuL :bite (. =.� .NUN I31V101I 6• V10Wi,N LEA I NIro .111H h101,1 • • AL IC uAEI I.A•4H_ 1 • VI I,ANUM 12AV, • 1 JUNIpe&U•j O. 'TA!•f V. • RI/ 00 Ares ts •�� ts' �;� �.T• 3 -' 00TOUGA ML NLIC i 1' fr- G L t uyxa ' . j 4Ur Mi1M . ru 1 �1.w0 try /. �• 1. . ,. _ i .�. , : u• � .. ',wf,A,.' �,..•.. `• ' .. � ... t. g9faO4, Y. +;�C;�' *'�4�9��;�D�!'Q�'1G�Q0`• � . �.. , \� 1 Arm • !� /1�±�it:. x..44 ��':v$.> •;• 44,/,:di 1: !Fi.�:ii l� ' L Q-&0•41 • AIL ii ,,. SIV — %M.1151011 14• cal 17YA •rLNATA L o •1o'dL 0• TNUJA PLILA1A 6' b•- 10' •.O• ACILC •1404/74 _P'^ .. ,1YFaii. PAR T / AL LANDSCAPE PL At ACA LI .wae.uwn" nww•... e4uww•••• wew•• r*Mn••••••W_._.,__ • MaM • 1 V . I!: V� Vie, GO ATTACHMENT E stiFSru/ S- +. ��_1r.:tiui..2.1&i�iitsi.c. u,.: r�:; AC 4.t,uat�."...,u.4'u�ra.ea uti41ri ^.0.iaod.GJl hs.:aN_:rt:�i,GaL viid�.+` ::.L"dfV'1Y,F1:iL't��` ^�rt�"� -a: ;e.:t1 +•r, vn+.C.:.: m`^CdekiSW1trt5.4aYF'. Z C L w k 0 ATTACHMENT F 4 30 HI tu .8 11 4 -r ATTACHMENT G a Z j rn � � 22 W U �zg L 8L c. it ATTACHMENT H 0 • • 1 J:f L!1 ATTACHMENT K 1111111kormailft■11, ef is L z :• O F- W }w > 0) Li , CA- 0 -w Eli 3 W CL c 2 orannIr ATTACHMENT L • Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review Page 8 L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf ATTACHMENT I1 Cumulative Development Conditions The following is a complete list of conditions to development which was established in the environmental review (SEPA), conditional use permit review and BAR design review processes. The status of satisfying these conditions are shown as shaded text. Environmental Conditions (SEPA) (L94 -0004) B.7. Environmental Health (Pg. 8) The Director of the Department of Community Development shall, in consultation with the Tukwila Golf Course Manager and other departmental representatives, ensure that the hazard of balls flying onto adjacent roadways and property has been mitigated to an acceptable level. e r str �d fe ve ess do ag Qpera¢tz B.11 Light and Glare (Pg. 11) The desire for bright grounds lighting to track the golf ball's flight, landing, and distance signs shall be accommodated as long as there is no direct off -site illumination and /or indirect glare such as produced by a "stadium halo." .eve rlitio at l:l m nata'a<troac B.14 Transportation elii »of1l'itfoa i. A traffic mitigation payment of $24,684.00 for intersection impacts shall be provided as discussed in the traffic study, prior to final construction approval. Staff Report to the L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Board of Architectural Review Page 9 ii. Frontal improvements as required by Public Works Department road improvements ordinances and /or the Planning Commission (Conditional Use Permit L94- 0005), shall be designed based on the 57th Avenue South (Southcenter Parkway) Design Report. As an alternative to immediate construction, the applicant may enter into a developer's agreement to provide a fair -share payment for the improvements, which would be built later in a coordinated manner with the overall road improvement. An exception would be permanent or temporary improvements which are determined by the Public Works Department or the Planning Commission (through the Conditional Use Permit process) to be needed immediately. An additional 10 foot right -of -way dedication or an easement for sidewalks, curbs, and utilities shall be provided prior to approval of the construction. This area is required in order to place the required frontal improvements as designed in the "57th Avenue South 'Preliminary' Design/Location Report". B.16 Utilities ;r Qat 11$ Adequate long term sewer service shall be provided to the site. This may be provided with a temporary sewer line, to satisfy the immediate needs of the proposed development, in conjunction with a developer's agreement to provide a fair -share payment for permanent sewer service; or the immediate placement of a long -term sewer line. Either option shall be provided prior to final building construction approval. ii. A developer's agreement to provide a fair -share payment for commercial water service, up- grading the existing substandard domestic line, shall be provided prior to final construction approval. Conditional Use Permit Conditions (L94 -0005) The development was approved subject to satisfying all SEPA conditions (above) and BAR approval (below). The D.C.D. Director shall determine net height and mesh size. I1• N w, w =! J F., u_ wO. g Q. s.0_ w. z� moo, z w' UGC --y. U. O Z Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review Board of Architectural Review (BAR) Conditions (L94 -0009) The BAR granted approval subject to the following conditions: L95 -0060: Tukwila Golf Page 10 a. implementation of all (SEPA) environmental mitigating measures as discussed above, b. extension of the on -site pedestrian sidewalk along the driveway, to the future area - wide sidewalk system, �eµ�ww;:; r:!; w:, v,. T�; ,w,�y,.s:;: <y,w•::.,►;Al��sw�s. _,:�«a:rw:: :.avr:rs....: screening of all HVAC and utility hardware in an architecturally integrated manner. d. potential gateway marker site with joint City/landowner participation. Ni7NC:i:!II.It,:;R11!Nft!•;Ri { iV;' ;�::�;1.{]►::;!N.M!kRa' 'iil;::3:{JtA1Riy/:1!;MRL ` i:Mti e. the project entry sign will be ground mounted as approved by the BAR. ti:!J�ilnt. t PLANNING COMMISSION /BAR MINUTES NOVEMBER 9,1995 (Approved 12/14/1995) Mr..Neiss called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members present were Commissioners Neiss, Meryhew, Malina, Livermore, and Marvin. Commissioners Stetson and Flesher were excused. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, John Jimerson, and Sylvia Schnug. Approval of Minutes: MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 10,1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 20,1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 24, 1995 MINUTES, WITH THE CHANGE THAT MR. MERYHEW WAS EXCUSED FROM THE MEETING. MR. LIVERMORE SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 24,1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. LIVERMORE SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MARVIN MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 28, 1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 30, 1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. LIVERMORE MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 31, 1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. • Planning Commission /BAR Minutes Page 2 November 9, 1995 MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 7,1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 14,1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. LIVERMORE MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 28, 1995 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. L95= 0060 :: Southcenter Golf Driving Range Vernon Umetsu presented the staff report. The proposal is for a 71 -unit driving range with 71 hitting stations. The site is a 13 acre development area which is part of a 22 acre "llama" farm. The north half of the property would continue as a llama farm. This project was reviewed by the BAR on April 28,1994. At that time, the building and site plan was approved as proposed, however, operational and accessory structure conditions were imposed through the Conditional Use process and the BAR process. The proposed building is approximately 18,000 square feet. A 50' - 90' fence is proposed for the east and most of the north side of the property. The building design continues as an almost "country club" orientation with banks of windows at various spots. Instead of the large sloped roof that was previously proposed, it is now proposed to be a tiered roof system. The applicant has raised the building 2 -3 feet, which has created additional usable second -floor area. The colors and materials are proposed to be the same. The one exception to the colors and materials is that the green tinted windows glass has been changed to clear glass. Staff would also propose to change the staff report to reflect that the vinyl window frames be changed to match more closely with the accent striping, instead of white. Ed Linardic, 1319 Dexter Ave. N., #260, Seattle, 19109: Mr. Linardic stated that wood is proposed for all four sides of the building, there is no stucco. He added they would prefer to have the darker windows frames, as staff has recommended. He also added that they are complying with all of the previously proposed conditions. Mr. Marvin asked what the poles holding up the netting would be made of. Mr. Linardic said they are wood. i• x dir,':i31nfr,n3$s. ' brh.' stitu�w;i2"me.44; `c 44w. ii�ii�>;�'iZ3n"::, «f- vG+:t: ?tiN,4: ,7f:A7Y1t]z3 ,uadri.::Fi +,�. 3x `,thtS?? .;Iva ;t,i4� Planning Commission /BAR Minutes Page 3 November 9, 1995 Bruce Mitchell, 3220 Magnolia Blvd., Seattle: He stated that he developed the property immediately across from this site. He is interested in finding out the plans for the road because it will affect the economic viability of the other businesses in the area. As of yet, they have not been able to get any information regarding what will happen with the road. Mr. Umetsu said there is no current planning process (road improvements, etc.) right now or scheduled for 1996 in the Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Umetsu added that he would take Mr. Mitchell's name and phone number and have Ron Cameron give him a call. Mr. Neiss closed the public hearing. MR. LIVERMORE MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0060: TUKWILA GOLF DRIVING RANGE, AS PROPOSED, WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE WINDOW TRIM BE CHANGED TO A DARK BROWN COLOR. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Malina declared that his son works at the Southcenter Eagle store. He added that he felt he could make a fair and impartial decision on this project, and that his affiliation will not impact his decision. There was no objection by the applicant or anyone in the audience of Mr. Malina hearing and deciding on this project. Mr. Livermore declared that he owns Eagle Hardware stock. He added that he did not feel that would affect his ability to make a fair decision on this project. There was no objection by the applicant or anyone in the audience of Mr. Livermore hearing and deciding on this project. L95 -0047: Eagle Hardware John Jimerson presented the staff report. There is proposed a 47,000 square foot addition. The primary area is a drivethrough lumber yard, and a 4,200 square foot addition to the garden department. Approximately 4,000 square feet of mezzanine area on the inside would be removed. Some of the landscaping will be reconfigured, and some parking has been eliminated. The applicant is also proposing to extend the glazing at the storefront area. The existing vestibules are proposed to be enclosed. The landscape plan has been revised to comply with the CBD Street Tree Plan. Mr. Jimerson presented a slide show of a variety of concrete tilt -up buildings in the vicinity, including another Eagle Hardware store. He added that staff's primary areas of concern are: 1. Better integration on the south wall facing Evans -Black Drive. w re R. U O' N cE. 1-4 uj . w0' a H Id Z 'H0. ww cn WW - O. • OI z Planning Commission /BAR Minutes November 9, 1995 Page 4 2. Better integration on the front between the entry of the lumber yard and the existing building. 3. Provide more interest and architectural detail, and landscaping on the north elevation. 4. Implementation of the CBD Street Tree Program. 5. Improvements in the circulation system. Mr. Jimerson noted two changes to the recommended conditions of approval. Four additional landscape islands should be added, which would become condition 2.b. Also, additional language could be added to the end of condition 3.a., which would read: "...or additional details shall be provided on the concrete wall which provides visual interest and integrates the wall with the rest of the south elevation." John Hallstrom, Architect, 919 124 Ave. NE, Bellevue, Wa: Mr. Hallstrom clarified that all customers would be entering and exiting through the four doors on the east side of the project. The intent is to have one entrance and three exits. Mr. Meryhew noted that anything stacked high, should be screened. Mr. Malina asked what Mr. Hallstrom thought about the Issaquah store and its design. Mr. Hallstrom stated that they did not design that store. Most of the slides were of new facilities, where here we are dealing with an existing building. Tom Sconzo, 919 124 Ave. NE, Bellevue, Wa: Mr. Sconzo stated that this is an existing building, which has been completely remodeled. They want to use a type of construction which matches the existing building, which is tilt -up. Therefore, the existing design on the west side has been carried around to the north side. The proposed design is simple and clean. Richard Ward, Landscape Architect, 1906 E. Aloha, Seattle, Wa: Mr. Ward stated that trees will be added, removed, and relocated. The west wall will be planted with a series of evergreen hedges. The street trees will be thirty feet on center. As the trees become larger, the building facade will be broken down from the street side. He continued by saying that they are addressing the concerns of the staff by adhering to the Street Tree Program, and by utilizing existing trees in the parking lot. Mr. Meryhew asked what the size of the trees will be at the time of planting. i '.+•.: cxl u:: �cu::hn�rti::.iiiirrioltk.';:of z" up ;6 D. 00. to Ill. tL, wO u a. . co �.w z t- O z� w, O 131-i 1- 11 O: O~ Planning Commission /BAR Minutes Page 5 November 9, 1995 Mr. Ward said they would be two inch caliper. The height of the trees will be about 10- 12 feet tall. The Flame Ash trees get to be 40 -60 feet tall. The Tulip trees will get to be 60 -80 feet tall. Mr. Sconzo stated they would comply with recommendation 1. a. through 1. d. They will also comply with recommendation 2. a. With regard to recommendation 3. a., they would agree with staff's recommendation to leave the wall without the glass and put some sort of design treatment on the wall to give it some interest. Mr. Meryhew asked how they could screen the materials. Mr. Sconzo said their standard has been to put in a twelve foot high wall. They do not get involved with the merchandising. They will work with staff to comply with recommendations 3. b. through 3. e. The design was intended to hide all the racks. He finished by saying that they would be complying also with recommendation 4, and new condition 2. b., adding four landscape islands. Dick Landon, 22820 148 SE, Kent, Wa: Mr. Landon stated that he was an adjacent property owner to the Eagle Hardware store. Eagle has always been a good neighbor and the new circulation ideas are positive. Mr. Jimerson said Eagle is allowed directional signage, although there are restrictions. He added that the Board would need to decide whether the revisions could be approved administratively, or if they wanted them to come back before the Board. Mr. Neiss closed the public hearing. Mr. Malina indicated he wanted the revisions to come back before the Board. Mr. Neiss said he had concerns with the north wall. Deciduous trees will not sufficiently soften the mass of that wall, and he indicated he would like to see some architectural details done to the north wall to enhance that more, and see the front side theme carried around. Mr. Marvin said he agreed. The level of design on the north wall has to be raised. He added that he was concerned with the traffic pattern for the lumber yard. Mr. Neiss agreed. Mr. Jimerson said that issue was reviewed by the traffic engineer. They did not find that there would be an increase in traffic, but they did indicate that, the applicant might put a sign up out of the eastern -most driveway, closest to the intersection, which requires right -turns only. z rt Of 0O' CO 0 w w _1 F. W O` g-J co D. ,iv.. I- w. _• z�. I- o` f-; .W W; 0'. V 0` N O :0 w w IL. I- 0;. • z` • O' Planning Commission /BAR Minutes November 9, 1995 Page 6 Mr. Meryhew concurred that he too was concerned with the north wall. The proposed trees will not do an adequate job of screening the wall. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0047: EAGLE HARDWARE, BASED UPON STAFFS FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: 1. A. THE SIDEWALK WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET. 1. B. THE SIDEWALK WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET. 1. C. THE SIDEWALK WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET. ADD CONDITION 2. B. THAT 2 TO 4 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WILL BE ADDED, AS DISCUSSED BY STAFF. 3. A. THE SOUTH ELEVATION OF THE GARDEN DEPARTMENT SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE A WALL WHICH ADEQUATELY SCREENS ANY STORAGE THAT IS ADDED IN THE GARDEN SECTION, WHICH MAY REQUIRE AN INCREASE TO 24 FEET IN HEIGHT SO THAT ALL STORAGE IS ADEQUATELY SCREENED, AND THAT THE WALL BE PROVIDED ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. ALSO, THE RECOMMENDED REVISIONS SHALL COME BACK BEFORE THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR FINAL REVIEW. MR. MARVIN SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. During the Director's Report, Lynn Devoir and Ann Siegenthaler presented to the Board, the proposed artwork for Foster Library. Mr. Neiss adjourned the meeting. Prepared By, Sylvia Schnug Yl ....,_,;,.{ x.." t.'%.t SI Y✓ �J„ YG:< nc-'.: :{;id�7'�:',t�i.'tiii:Fi:e:�h,': 3i4:,,t:'titsil..`E;lis: Date: 17- Jun -96 10:04 From: VERNON (VERNON UMETSU) To: RON -C Copies -to: GREG,JACK,STEVE,VERNON Subject: Tukwila Golf Glare Importance: HIGH Message -id: A02DC53101DEDEDE Conditions included no direct light onto road and no greater than five foot /candles of indirect light at the property line (indirect light level greater than the 1 ft /cndl usually allowed due to safety issues). Lighting analysis by their lighting engineers was submitted to demonstrate satisfying this condition and was included in the building permit file. Applicant knows by letter and permit conditions that failure to satisfy condition means no lights. I left a message for Chris Bennett that he must rapidly resolve this issue or turn off the lights and that I'll be working on it this week (w /Greg). vern vern 1:===;a1, vszaostmeromatagAMEZMWSZ111, 1 A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N G )L V )A WALLL.-A--'EI' hereby declare that: aN.ticeL of PubjZic Hearing Ey Q Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit J Shoreline Management Permit QDetermination of Non - significance fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action O Official Notice 0 Other f Other • was mailed to each of the following addresses on (Fl_s56e._ ATI1V-14E-15 4. Name of ProjectSU(�L��� v 1 x=17 Signature; c- (PV'i,'uQjL ... File Number Lq5 - DOCoD ,r Gt•�3u"'i+'�:.: Y:,i::iil.`r .�. ,: 6isr'.: i�' tii` dal:::'e:�"..m-.^.X:..vi5tllti_ :•,.. t. �w.'. xui..: A& w;: :i',.:ci:t:.:i:.va+n:�:,ss:.tsa ?`e:•�ue: :;1:3:4,:a1V.:14tivis rfrtO4iCrSidZ: sit4ai," 1 ;i5Eeli'• , %..4::WGe.Lv>:,11:'- ,,.,..... A City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PUBLIC NOTICE City of Tukwila Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on November 9, 1995, in.the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: II. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L95 -0060: Southcenter Golf Driving Range Ed Linardic Board of Architectural Review approval of revised building designs for a 71 station golf driving range with a two- story, 330 ft. long building and 100 parking spaces; on 22.62 acres. 18791 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila. L95 -0047: Eagle Hardware Sconzo /Hallstrom Architects Board of Architectural Review approval to remodel and add a 52,645 sq. ft. addition to existing Eagle Hardware Store. 101 Andover Park East, Tukwila Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times October 27, 1995 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 - : • Bruce & Elizabeth Mitchell 3220 Magnolia Blvd. W. Seattle, WA 98199 Gaco Western, Inc. PO Box 88698 Tukwila Station Seattle, WA 98188 • Robert Schoenbachler 1003 Lake Street S. - #100 Kirkland, WA 98033 King County 500 K C AdmimAuilding Seattle, WA 98104 Mario A. Sega le 18010 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Herman Schoenbachler 18115 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Mario A. Segale PO Box 88050 Tukwi 1 a , WA 98188 Schneider tiOmes,,Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 1. Tukwila, WA 98188 e4a) AF F I.)AV I T Notice 'of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short .Subdivision Agenda Packet. D Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit QShoreline Management Permit O F D I S T `i. I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Determination of Non - significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance fl Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action fl Official Notice 0 Other 0 Other wasted to each of the following addresses on � fq r 19itkuvb'aL_. goot4-u --or),Ls Name of Project E. () b Stur.e �hS r File Number IA S- OCT 23 '95 10:28AM TUK1 DCD'PW � 4 BOARD OF ARCHITEC»IRAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWI,L.A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P. 7 • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone; (208) 481 -3880 • FOR STAFF ,USE .ONL'Y'• • • ;Planner; oil. -�Irl. �ile(1�Tumber: � 4"J '' (O O(iQ Cross- Reference'Files: . ' • Rec ip$'Number' :. • • 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL :Construction of a 71 station golf driving range with supportive facilities. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- '' division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Tax lot #15- located on the west side of 57th Ave S.; 2,500' So of 180th • V Quarter: W 1/2 . APPLICANT ;* Section: 35 Township: 23 (This information may be found on your tax statement) Name: Edi Linardic Range: 4E Address: 1319 Dexter Ave No #260 Seattle, Wa 98109 (206) 283 -4764 Fax 284-1293 Signature: -- Date : Oct 23 -1995 * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. 4. PROPERTY OWNER AFFIDAVIT OF OWNER ... Name: Bob Schoenbachler Address; Phone; I /WE,[signature(s)) (signature on file with CU Permits) swear that I /wre a e a owner(#) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: RECEIVED OCT 2 4 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OCQCT. 23-7-95 -cm-gait-Dr-24 t-D DciVis iW liESION REVIEW AP�...4QN ^k Priipe 2 CRITERIA . The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision-making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion of appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations u%eet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian. movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: A. The site is 1andsca• -d screened from 57th Ave So. a are =ndsca•e arki is cif: tared ac i _ to _the building end • wel with the site 2 RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO. ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, liras, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street Circulation should be encouraged: RESPONSE: A. The strong linear character of the bldg. has been reflected in th'e horizinal'lines of the design. B. The 1andscapina blends with the surrounding character of the site. • C. _TALI JAL. reflects a strong pedestrian scale. D. The Darkina is clustered near the entry of the bldg. with circular B. internal circulation. twieftitgagnalleurgetweese- RECEIVED OCT 2 4 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0€ocT 23 '!S DCDiPI,PW { DESIGN REVIEW AEI. 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where iodating topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. . B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. . C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade: z D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, z mitigating steps should be taken. • , re 2 E. Wl ►erebuilding sites limitplanting, the placement of t a sor shrubs in paved areas Isencour- -I ci; UO F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accent- , w w' lashed use of walls fencing, plandng or combinations of these. Screenin should be N P by � � P $ $ u.: effective in winter and summer. w 0 G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and g pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used 1 � a td H. . Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- _ scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the Z �': ti.+te�++o anri �riian nt arPa_ Liehting should be shielded, and restrained in design, Excessive o; • brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. z'' no a o (S )w w U U. F" 0: U— The service areas have been screened with fences and/or plantings. z RESPONSE: MB The topo�rap� i cha�ractrer and site grading, blend with the development • and the character of the site. GOD The landscape treatment_xeinforces the character, of the development. G. N/A H. The parking and bldg. lighting are designed as down lighting to reduce Jlare.� 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. .:. "-'. Ei; L"( s :;".k�>i,cti :i " >`'itu�si :�•; : -,. :e.re,:::.':.r,a.>. „i.:rv,rr:isdi. views..: i�: tElSti>."' n'.• .C'."'•..nS,yStiitt�'u�r'..:.,. :rte; 'RECEIVED OCT 2 4 1995 COMIN/ UNITY DEVELOPMENT DE8IO REVIEW AP LI i O 'N Eogr■ os Alfa g " e P: is0ol 4 111 5 C. Building components - such ats windows, doors, eaves, and parapets • should have good pro- . portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shell be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. • E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest: ' RESPONSE: Asal The bldg design is a low profile structure and is reflective of a resi-dentia character. C. See submitted elevations. D. Selected colors reflected the natural character of the site. E. Mechanical e ui•mentis ground located and screened. F. Downlighting is planned. . The b %iie 1onl and narrow, has good architectural form and interest. B. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site,landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: A. No accessory bd1g. are planned. B. Exterior lightin& of pedestrian areas will be in harmon with the site and the develo.ment. RECEIVE..) OCT 2 1995 coMMuNs %DEVELOPMENT ' BCotrn± ge 10 28AM TUI4M" aniR DESIGN REVIEW APPLICC. PI4g. 6 ' INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the Special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people - oriented we, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District, Use additional response space, if necessary. 1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. The site is not in the Interurban S.ecial Review District 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. ' The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on-site pedestrian circu- lation. • Theproposed propertyuse should be compatible withneighboring uses and complementuy to the district in which it is located. 5. The proposed development should see.k to minimize significant adverse environmental im- pacts. Thepropoaed development should demonstrate due regard'for significanthistorical features in the area, RECEIVED OCT 2 4 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5mm Drawing# File: L95 -0 mm Drawing# File: L95 00(c0 5mm •Drawing# mm Drawing# Smm Drawing# L95 -00l0() smm Drawing# 5mm Drawing# 5mm Drawing# mm • Drawing# • 35inni Drawing# ,'"';'; • 1 ..,.1." 1. • It V1, • r'ii.61411;#41.0,111 ' iii iiii 21 117. .g1g 811 Lit 911 11(11r1:1111111311;1111171111111t11;illir11;1114;11111111111111:1111111i1111111111111111111111b1d111111111111111111111111111111111111111 . • • • 4zAPPROVED • DATE.1-77011INITIALSZ..U. • . , 14ECEIVD. R '2 01994 - 111 y 1 111111g-1 ill", id J.1.1 iv 111111 RECEIVED 2 0 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r f'ntES SH!•LL•: ryL 1;FOJ01 - � 5 r�o�oF: pf rl�t�wP� . rra�ew- P� I: E. 7rLE /- r D ..ii/ gFEnscrTE) ":; .•. x. • #1,06- e ►A: ff P s'i a !► a.:. •, , .1.. , .. h a l c .,l .r m � �L=CEIVED . 47 2'0199, COMMUNIT . n._VCLOPMENi iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii ICI iii III iii iii iii iii I�I� 1 ff; '� 12I I 13I I. I a�:r;� 1..5I I G _n: Olf: l317 8I7~ LI7. L. v.. 4IZ I'7, f :IZ .7,1r. I. or, (I Mt Lit JII i mi uuhui mdiiii iiuhui uuhm iudmi miluu mihm milmi mduu mdim iiuluii mduu uuluu uulmi mdii1 ylAil. ei • \ 1 I a 0s4111 OARRT D:AIOOR� O COyyrORATRARC111TRCT .'A RCII ITRCTYRR • .URRAN TLANNINU O.' LANUICAPi ARCIIITLCTURR• 11111 NI Y . MA b.rAR 11l 11�T D TLL'T111111111' • it • F�CEI VEp Itg4': 2 01994 . 'CUMNIUNITY. .. n VEl qF MENT 1161•.. al I 3l I . I . k�:.• 1..51 • l Olf: (ill eIZ� LIZ • ol8 L'I7 LIZ • f•IZ : 7.1Z . If Z • Ult n(jll 9h zit flll mi uuluu imhm iudim milmi uulmi uulmi imlmi uuluu uulmi mihm uuluu uiihui uulmi uuhm uului t r • TESL STANDARD NOTES 1. The Contractor 'shall' sweep and /or wash down streets at least daily or more frequently as necessary and so directed by the City. .t No sediment laden runoff shall occur from the site, .and .. no tracking of silt shall occur onto adjacent roadways., acce55 may be CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. Arrange and attend preconstruction with City of Tukwila inspector. 2. Flag clearing limits. 3. Install filter fence. 4. Install construction entrance. 5. Install sedimentation ponds and outlet system. 6. Place preload. 8. Perform finish grading. 9. Seed or surface disturbed areas. 10. Remove sediment pond riser systems and clean out and test storm drain aystem. 11. Remove silt fences after site has been stabilized and the City's inspector has approved the removal. • meeting !J\ gEGIN S /LT /'. PENCE ALONG • ,- —80rFER L-/MIT C - C.:›1 .{•yCIH(!� Dirt+I yo CLE +AR/N G L/M /T '7 EXsT p/TCN_ 8UPFEC L/M /T (CLEAR //✓G "L/M /T) /7/- e /NSTALL P /P /NG PE/e ',e4 /NAGS PLAN S/LT FENCE R/SER PIPE w/ WE /GNTEO EASE I 3o LP- 41PERP. APS -BOTH PONDS TOP OP.QERM = 25. 53,TYP CLE�A>zING LIM1T' :•145' •44f • • • ti'-so' 1/4'SSMH re *tf•l2 CLEA.e /NG —.28 SOUTH CENTER PKWY SDS SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 310•_ 208TH ST SE ERIHEEL WA 10012 MI-0!ei /Z -5 -94 Reviserd Per New Psnrinq Layoat TUKWILA GOLF DRIVE NG RANGE SCALE:. l ° = 30! DES:, DC p• Ili iii ili 'JI iii Ili ili ili iii 'II Ih il! III ili ili ili IlI I�rrh rII III.I�i III IIIl I I I I 1 I•..' 12I I I 13 +. I I I al:.•I I I „5I I I G `I Olf: (i17. 9IZ� LIZ, or 5I7. 't�V fa7. 7,IZ IIZ,.Olt ^(jli at IA DI[ IIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII 1111IIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIfjiii IIIIIpII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIII MOOS .. .. .. • • • " ♦ f F . I'.. >, '' { ' • f ;} a r " • -. _J x/11 D architects Ilnardlc design group . architects 1319 dasher ay. n •cult. 260 wattle. WA. 06109 (206)203-4764 A B C D • I E F C H - M t• . N ' P Q ' • R' • S T. • NOT PUaUSNED. ALL REINS RESERVED. WE AROSE DM'RNOS MD SPECNIGATONa AND IDEAS DESUNS AHD AMANDOIWIa REPRESEIR. THERM ME MD SNALL N[\WN M PNOPRIY W INC MCIEIECr. NO PART TIEIIEOP SHALL SE REPRODUCED. SOLD. PUSJSNEO. OR OTHERWISE USED WITHOUT TK•PW,OR WRITTEN CONSENT Of OP AND MPAOPMIS COMPENSATION 1D TC MCNOECt. VISUAL GAMILY WITH TIE ABOVE EVIDENCE OR VI GTOF SHALL DONSO CONCU SM w Doicc Of WIa TES 116IA= AKADNCE I S ACCOR • ' �P � E ofaeserrenao ��..�eriEracrl ' % PI ml 1.NA/010 AM OP WA.OgION CONTINUOUS METAL GUTTER (PAINT) CEDAR LAP SIDING • ' ROOFING WD TRIM I ., METAL VINYL FRAME INS(JLATED GLASS - I fl ■■iilu■.■il■■■ ■ I■■■m! ■■■ ■■ ■ ■■■IIIIII■II MMEMII ■■■■■■■■■■■Ilim- `1*IU■U 1 1 1 1 1 1 in, - ...sr■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ♦1, — ■ .. O L..I consultants ,—... __—(IN ■ ... ... -� Y.. .. G..I :.. f: I �L..l_= I...I �. - - - -■ L.. L.. __ = ... ... __�... —� I ���� IDS JPHIHIII!IIIIUUINIi.1. '=� =` "'1111 111'111;_° = ' EOO } GATE ACCESS TO •- S TEES U TEI ELEVATION . . A- = TEMPERED GLASS • 2 3/32 " =1' -0" . \ 2 3• 4 T T 4 3 , .11J-O" MAX i - i2 EACH „.. :::• d•.•r.•::�•.• }:•'r: }:•:•.. { }•:; K:::::• NETTNG BETWEEN v { {{•:::$::'J• \�� {� {.�: •J+: }.r;.,• }. }•}: }}x�J.:. ; :. }•: :.;•:: : ::.J.; :J ::.•::.;•. ?� ^},;• J••:: •• 1, } }:.; i;; I. ti. HITTING STATION, Y!D I 2X TRIM (P (P N7) VT) 1 B OWNER ' r.• }:fi:; :. }•.,. ':r.•:••r {..•.•.•:�••••... ••'•:• }::• } } }• ,•:,• ' IX WD TRIM .�E4'r' HITTING BARRIE I'r --r'I CI 9u G7O STATION NET I I I I I i I L project title: say/ I� ED `YDIYWf " RANGE FOR: SONJ4G�6Cb4CW �' GOLF IP M P C�OO�I� �G9 'TU KWILA, WA - -_ '� IIIIIII t SAFETY -' MX 1 IC `IIIIIIIII .1. _ _ __ ' _- E _ gm , N 4 _ i. i::::iu::: r �l'�l��1lll11lll1lll •,1 11 " "li R1111111111111'111 ��� III' *I: I I �-�_ iI:11 — ^ /°\ PROTECTIVE 0 EXTEND TO PROTECTIVE NE7fING I. /Z�' ' &Mb EAST ELLEVATUGH WEST:' ELEVATKOH 3/16"=V-0" 3/32' =1' -0" . 3/32 " =1' -0" S S R 0 N M L K J H G F E D C B A sheet title: PRIOR ELEVAT00HS _. 11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ il■■■■■ i.■■■■■■■■ ■■■■�s■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i_■■u■■r -- 7 %_,-'`.u■ ■■■■i■■■ i ■_■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■Un■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.__ :: - - I : : =1 MI : : :I 1 :: : :: Iff __ JI :: :I : : :I : :: �I : : :h` 1 = = =1 :: :�: : —I: I' � T I T� T -- • ............... r... ..- - -- - -- --- -w - -- - -- -w -w -w T wi ■w MI – --w. - F.,. (err.( 10.3 -I I I _._. _ – — N O R T H E aC 7AT00N NOTE: - B.A.R. no: revisions date: o: sheet no 14o O CELD OC•( 2 5 1995• to SW MUfYI 1 ._ 3 32' =1' —O" THE LAP SIDING AND TRIM TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXTERIOR - f�J��N ,� ELEVATIONS PER SOUTH ELEVATION : DATE 1.. ,J INITIALSL".., • ' . draw' Checked: dater 2 -8 -95 . R• • I I I I I I I I I I I i i .: I II 121 II 11111 II 1 . 1 . 1 IgII lI:.i•I1 IIII III III Iil Iil III Iil� I I,5I I 6 8.LZ• 7. ' f7, Q2'^(jt BIT LI 91 I 11031 • PLANTING BED TYP 1" .RADIUS TYP EXTRUDED CONC CURB - -2" AC PAVING 1' -0" - SUB BASE PER SOILS REQ'MENTS PLANTING BED TYP r RADIUS TYP EXTRUDED CONC CURB W/2 #4 BARS CVONT. 2" AC PAVING 1. I" DIA WEEP HOLES AT 10' 0.C. AND BACK HOLE WITH FILTER FABRIC CLOTH 2. CUT CONTROL JOINTS AT ALL CURVE RETURN PRINTS AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 15' IN LENGTH 3. AT IA PR VIDE REINFORCED CORNERS WITH CONCRETE REINF Wj � D 1 RESPECTIVLEYDFROM BOTTOM CURB FINISH WITH TOOLED EDGES • OEXTRUDED • CONC CURB "'r IIIPI a 111111 I11 REINF ROD $4 VERT 2 HORIZ IN RINGS 0 12" OC LT 1,000W METAL HALIDE LIGTH FIXTURE 4 SO STEEL POLE HANDHOLE COVER BASE PLATES METAL BASE PLATE 36" ANCHOR BOLTS GRADE CONDUIT 24" DIA CONC BASE ()LIGHT STANDARD BASE 4 © 30 = 120' 2" AC PAVING OVER CHUSHED ROCK CONC CURB AND SIDEWALK(EXPOSED. AGG) W/#4 BAR CONT I. • —4,--1.4 - -1 x1' 4. CONC CURB PLAN N SUB BASE PER I, 6" I SOILS REPORT 2X8 WOOD CAP SIDING OVER 5/8 T &G PLYWD OVER 2X4 0 16' O.C. PROVIDE 2 #4 BARS INTO WHEELSTOP TO SECURE TO PAVED SURFACE EMBED MIN PROVIDE WHEEL STOP AT SIDEWALK EDGE SLOPE PARKING STALL TO SIDE WALK MAX SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1:20 • SIDE SLOPES NOT TO EXCEED 1:50 2" CHAMFER #4 BAR - WHEEL STOP OHANDICAP PARKING ENTRANCE 2'X3"X3 /16"HST EFRAME W /7%8"X1" CONT F.B. WELDED TO ST 0 T &B 1X4 CEDAR (STAIN TO MATCH BLDG) 1' -8 4" CON SLAB ON GRADE W/ WIRE MESH 2 #4 CONT SECTION 0 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 18 @ 35' -3 = 635' -0" ELEVATION CANEOLT ONE PER GATE 3/16" GALV ROD & TURN BUCKLE ONE PER GATE 1; 1X3 TRIM 8" LAPP SIDING ELEVATION LAPPED SCREEN WALL WORDS IN AT LEAST ONE INCH LETTERS: RESERVED PARKING" SIGN MARKED WITH INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACESS AT LEAST 2 1/2" X 2 1/2" • UNDER SYMBOL " STATE DISABLED PARKING PERMIT REQUIRED" 0 2" DIA STEEL PIPE ., EMBED SIGN POST IN 8" DIA CONC. FOOTING. HOLD IN 2' -6" FROM FACE OF CURB CENTERED IN PARKING SPACE PAINT 2 COATS TRAFFIC YELLOW INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESS PER ANSI A117.1 -1980 SEC 4.30.2 ' CENTERED IN PARKING SPACE 0 HANDICAP SIGN PROPOSED .EXTERIOR: RANGE LIGHTS LIGHTING DESIGNED BY GE LIGHTING SYSTEMS POLE MOUNTING HT. POWERSPOT 20 POWERSPOT 22 TOTAL K.W.• C.71 (31(71UI(31(710)0)0) 0) J-1 JJJ 00000000 Q. q CT C71CTU!O1(7.3 U1 6 2 8 8.7 3 2 5 5.5 3 1 1 4 4.4 3 3 3.3 3 1 3 3.3 3 3 3.3 3 3 3.3 3 .3 3.3 0 3 3 3.3 3 I • 3 3.3 3 3 3.3 3 3 3.3 3 . 3 3.3 3 3 3.3 , 3 '.; 3 3.3 2 2 2.2 1 1 1.1 TOTALS 75' 51 5 61.0 61.0 POWERSPOT 20 IN CAT NO. PSFAO1M A3GPO (7608 CURVE) POWERSPOT 22 IN CAT NO. PSFAO1M A2GP2 (6947 CURVE) 4 ® 30' = 120' 0 rn 0 0 EAST ELEVATION 2 3 ® 48'7 = 145' -9" P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 5 ® 29'2 = 145' -9" P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 6 ® 30' -5" = 182' -6" P13 P14 P15 4 ® 30' -5" = 121' -9" 1 5 ® 21' -2" = 145' -9" in n 0 u� P16 P17 3 @ 48' -7" = 145' -9" WEST ELEVATION 5 ® 50' = 250' I 0 NORTH ELEVATION NOTE: NETTING ELEVATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY BUILD PER ENGINEERED DRAWINGS BY KPFF ()DRIVING RANGE NETTING AND POLES B.A.R. APPROVED DATE 1 ` /.frINITIALS_ DG 0 architects Ilnardlo Cosign group • architects 1312 d.xt.r .v.. n .ult. 200 snap, WA. 22100 (200)223 -4704 NOT PtISUSNED. ALL NONNS ROER'm. THE ABOVE DRAWN= AND sPECInDATENS AND IDEAS MOONS NO ARRAIApIOIS ROREEENT ENRON ARE AND SHALL NOUN THE PROPERTY or TIE MCW16T. No PMT SMOOT NMU SE ROMODUCCD. COPIED. ADAPTED. DISCLOSED 011 DISTRIBUTED TO OTHERS. SOLD. PUNISHED. OR OTHERWISE USED WITHOUT TH.PRIO R WROTEH consort or ISO APPROPRIATE c01lOIM1)N Ip M ANNE ARCHITECT. VISUAL CONTACT rani THE ASE ORANNOS p1 sPECl/1UTONS SHALL CONEnUTE COHCL SNE EVIDENCE or ACOPTANC R MN RSRNTION consultants project title: PROPOSED GOLIF ROM FOR: SOVONCIEHTEN OOLIF ONO sheet title: SUM BOWLS no- revIIona data lob no: draw: checked: I � I I I I I � I I I I 1111,11 I I 1 1 1 l I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I III I�I 111 III III 111 II'I 1I1 I�I III III 1 11 1112 ..� 12I I I sI I I.4 ..I 1..5� I 161 9I1) 6IZ 8I& LIZ : ft i. 9IZ 't1 I:I7. 7.IE IIZ, 9 E 9I1 9It 1. 1 9I1 1 uu uuluu milml uulml ulllioilmihm uulmi uuhul uu6m uulull uuhm uuluu uulml mlluu IIIIIIIII mind data • OCT 25'1995 sheet no: 0✓/-`rte ��ppMM 1MUNITY pLEyELOPMENT NORTH ELEVATION NOTE: NETTING ELEVATIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY BUILD PER ENGINEERED DRAWINGS BY KPFF ()DRIVING RANGE NETTING AND POLES B.A.R. APPROVED DATE 1 ` /.frINITIALS_ DG 0 architects Ilnardlo Cosign group • architects 1312 d.xt.r .v.. n .ult. 200 snap, WA. 22100 (200)223 -4704 NOT PtISUSNED. ALL NONNS ROER'm. THE ABOVE DRAWN= AND sPECInDATENS AND IDEAS MOONS NO ARRAIApIOIS ROREEENT ENRON ARE AND SHALL NOUN THE PROPERTY or TIE MCW16T. No PMT SMOOT NMU SE ROMODUCCD. COPIED. ADAPTED. DISCLOSED 011 DISTRIBUTED TO OTHERS. SOLD. PUNISHED. OR OTHERWISE USED WITHOUT TH.PRIO R WROTEH consort or ISO APPROPRIATE c01lOIM1)N Ip M ANNE ARCHITECT. VISUAL CONTACT rani THE ASE ORANNOS p1 sPECl/1UTONS SHALL CONEnUTE COHCL SNE EVIDENCE or ACOPTANC R MN RSRNTION consultants project title: PROPOSED GOLIF ROM FOR: SOVONCIEHTEN OOLIF ONO sheet title: SUM BOWLS no- revIIona data lob no: draw: checked: I � I I I I I � I I I I 1111,11 I I 1 1 1 l I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I III I�I 111 III III 111 II'I 1I1 I�I III III 1 11 1112 ..� 12I I I sI I I.4 ..I 1..5� I 161 9I1) 6IZ 8I& LIZ : ft i. 9IZ 't1 I:I7. 7.IE IIZ, 9 E 9I1 9It 1. 1 9I1 1 uu uuluu milml uulml ulllioilmihm uulmi uuhul uu6m uulull uuhm uuluu uulml mlluu IIIIIIIII mind data • OCT 25'1995 sheet no: 0✓/-`rte ��ppMM 1MUNITY pLEyELOPMENT _FLANT�LI�T� /41/td/ / Camnx'f7 Ndn7 - • Aces tk rum ' ncd . ura er-' / td ..ref, er Maple C0i /, .i3 +' J? trunus CBrAs/feY21 .` •AJ Q r7' / P%awcr7/ 1 . Plum 2 ":Ci/;' 61.0 �GGY G //'GitwaM / o //7G NG' /G 7 21n , g' Min rrays s ',49,nanesatte / r/owar rrr� iii y . 2 °_ cwt /• y F: fapae/s .,v. /# ' 174//a '/, Gcm rde f 1/gr /z'�7n/r7 3!' 777400 P / /l�r? L.wertern god Eedo - ;' min s� • f3eeudofJUea 6/?ziecl / daa,r fr. 8' %r1/n. Of' • .. /'/ /-7J c/ , 4 ' M //v qr/ ; v-c' °Min, r , • �. (Xialvde( 1tVt7 • clean ,<41t77 W tl/ti7fGdue Z7" /77/l7. z2hc jddndron U/7 /C7UG Z4'' /n/n, . . } Prunus G; lJtta Ile 1 ' / 0.trz, . 4e/e/ier7 laurc% 2/1" /nisi. V Lzirnum Pav/d" s / /on Z!7 /fR �Urp'G UF'e/L'/Ot • oesrGtaM?phleGar Gito- aia / (Gi/7nIG /G /n/7A /G itaJ15 saieta/. G pot-1 - ,(cc _Lr/7 • . H rareeded : 1,0ti - ,fec p, it { -tdr4 H //x ' /*/7os ' / Mhns /yJ. 4"yn>s 29 ". oG T. hu/1 d, ?!I7//1//( ./ r'ergmidi/ Ar r 0. Pre-'. 5' /72i?7 ¢ y c ,f• ,� jr. 1 . r.Ery: ;i��gt'Pl �.� . i_,.. , 8ffbgrad•s� naludinq,b.sas ;• to,•;wlthin 1/10th,idot provided ^'.y `./by'^,gansral traotor�unisss-,otherwisa noted p' "ettpgrads a llebh .carifi'sd or rototillad.if conditions fii r.quirs.: •.• . , i , .i;.ti �bii: ,4N depth t oil' in all pladtinq:araas ,,. , ,•••2.zdepth f grads barktauloh'in all prantinq bads 1 `� 1 plant tarial.ahill;:ba healthy,'iu11and conforr6.to USA•I s t r,;nirlarryy'stock,'latiit edition glint, sate ia1 or .:.slot kind' net'availabls aay bb , i, t '• subitituta enly.with approval of; landscape architect or' All etas p antings shalI�, va)trianqular :pacing . �. t +•r +Allxtrsi p is sha11?bs� 'to insure proper drainag.; . Positive d ainagS shatl�tiinad wound planting arses' tileifnrfi 11 /W t '6 .T 1 J .. '. A: ahruba =and trea0iniausp42N1ro. curb for oar.firer anq t.R 8.wid bs k sovsinq tesipXIwhsri lawn i adJacent to. i.;'buildinq v l ,.Landscape nttiaotor chill aaiprsin site until fiHall ' - dnspsation and•aaceptano.b er W .t' .Over.B' TREePCANTINO :'DETAIL',• ' Deciduousl eat and ;'evergreen t eeti'.under!8',,'.. ; Elstanci - NENNETN L . iCERTIfICATE -NO 363' B.A.R. APCPROVED OkY ;I 1fsINITIALS��. iliiiiiiiiliiliiiiIliIIIIliIIIIliilliiiIliIliillIlIIIIIlrIjIIliIIIrliIII o : 6 BIZ.ti LI7. • .0 Sli. Ilg f;17 7I7. 112, Olr 4It 81t Llt ell uu imlllll uulmi Illlluu uulliu ll ll Imlmi uuluu mlhm mduu iudim uuluu uulmi uuluu uulu Drawing# • 0....".41, , • I £1c/517K6 57'. dv, S: FuTuni 7o' R,o14. ,-CALVIN' woana • cwroun..cuwur » • r.t u. wn • Pal 01 Off MO SAE R.o.w. I \ - .r t• II r. Fttt j 7 B.A.R. DATE�OVED . ���rINITIALS�16� lHPkakr�r../'f7t :FtWt4TAG Cf of a 1367 . I3_. c 61.0; s c.,P6kcavel) Lr -c060 :. ' .. !ECEIVEJ' .. (1111111 1-11 I IUI II ilI ITVI II 121 1 I. 1A 1it i.i 1 IIl iiIIIII IiI Iji r 1 ''I• iji'Iji IjI .141:.;1 1 1..51 1 1 16 • 1 Olf; 61Z 81Z�• LIZ, .9 OF, t'ig f:1Z •Z7, 11Z• O'nfjll 811 Lit 01 mi iiiihm uuhm uulmi mihiuhuilmi uuluu uuhm iuiluu uufmi uulmi uuluu uuhui uulmi iuilmi uulul 1' TESC STANDARD NOTES 1. The Contractor shall sweep and /or wash down access streets at least daily or more frequently as may be necessary and so directed by the City. No sediment .laden runoff shall occur from the site, and no tracking of silt.shall occur onto adjacent roadways. . CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. Arrange and attend preconstruction meeting with City of Tukwila inspector. 2. Flag clearing limits. 3. Install filter fence. 4. Install construction 'entrance. 5.' Install sedimentation ponds and outlet system.• 6. Place preload. 8. Perform finish grading.. 9.. Seed or surface disturbed areas. 10. Remove sediment pond riser systems,and clean . out and test storm drain system. 11. Remove silt fences after 'site has been stabilized and the City's 'inspector has approved. the removal. .// EXST 0/TCH— - BUP'FE.0 L/M /T CLEAR /NO /A/STALL P /P /NG Mr PRA /NAGE PLAN S /LT FENCE R /SE,t P /PE w/ K/E /GNTEP BASE ¢304F- 4 ',°6RF. A05 -ROTH PONDS TOP OF BERM =Z5.53,TYP / 8'E'G /N S /LT • PENCE ALONG • BUPFa:P L- /MIT 1 CLEARING LIMIT / w SOUTHCENTER PKWY C/CAvgL CONSTRUCTION ENT2ANC6 B.A. A�PPROi DATE 1dL`141N s iji 1ji 111 1�1 1lliliili7j1111111 iji`lIl ill 111111 111 1Ii i111�1 111 ill ill ill ij:1" I I I ll ,:l, :I I• ZI I L i 31 ! I _I I. I 151 I I I �. IOIf: Ii17 8I7.t LIZ o r Or tj7. ::IZ .71z: t :I7, Or (jl: 8I! 1,4 011 IIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII 1117111111111IIIli IIIIII111IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII III1JIIII 11111 l IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIj R • !ED , TIAI.S' SDS • Sf1E DEVELOPMENT SERMCES 310 208TH ST SE BOINLLLWA 0401: *HMV /Z- 5- 94 'revised Par New P4rkb79 Layoet i D ■ TUKWILA GOLF DRIVING RANGE DATE: 8 -8 -9¢ DES: DCD SCALE: 1 " = 301 DWN: . V CG GRADI NG 0 TESC PLAN L% loo • SEP 2 819.5 2, OF 3 • .0 °VELOPMENT .,,-,:r, . ,l.s.q:.•,,,,, ..,,,",,,,,, ...1,,f;:c,,T, .1:,,,•.'.,';;7;" •`,77,77i.i,!•,., e.:311•.:LT,-4,,,, . . . . . , • ., ./.. 1. ..-----. • .E..: '......-- .. ., .....,...", cek UNDISTURBED VEGITATION 04 29' 28" R 497.50 L = 38.85 cfi -.••• •gt , oZ • N›,• L•09'=51'.0' e' cios -36' 9• 9 0 9.-0 = 81'-0" 24' z z z NEW AC PAVING ------- 11 0 9 -0" 12(0-0" 11 0 9 -0" = 126-0" • BUILDING NOTE: FOR SITE DETAILS SEE SHEET A-4 RANGE AREA LANDSCAPE NIC °GRID LINE GRASS GOLF TEES 6'-0" HIGH WOOD FENCE YI,/ 4' AWING GATE s 45' oz' 27. W 84.26 RANGE SCREENING BY OTHERS NIC SEE ELEVATIONS SHEET A-4 ar 00' 55" R = 266,50 93.10 274.-7" TYP SOUTHCENTER PARKWAID° PARMAL 3[17E PLAN : . 111111111111111111)11LTIT11111111111131 1111.1111 pp I I NEW CURB CUT PER CITY OF •UKWILA REQ. . 1 1 1 ;Z(1Ar34 s 81 1IT 1111111111 111111111111111 [IITIII1111181111111111111111111i11111111111118181111111111111f111811181111111111188111111111111 81111 EDGE OF EXISTING PAVING BAR. tlictE tiaNsz INITIALS LW-COW architects Ilnardlo .d•n group . isrOhltoOt• 1310 (Sumter avg. n siutto 20; spattlo., WA. ..10Q ociermia-47e4 NOT Pt. MI. ROHM W. Re MOW OIVIII4114 • ARO •KORCATION31 MO WAS OCIDON1 NO ARIMMIDADMI REPROIOR *NAM ME MO POLL MOM 1110.=. • OF TM NICIVICT. ,m PART MORRO/ SHALL OR COPRA. AMMO. DISCLOISM Oft ORTRIMIITO TO OT1OO4 MD. PUOUSRIED. OR OTMOIRISC UIW MflCUT IIIPPRIOR WROTER COMM OP Me APPROPRIATO OCMPORNOCRIp_ne ARCWIECT. VISUAL COMO= WTI CO MOM ~NOB OR SPECIROMICOM WW1 CONWOORT COMOUJONT MOM Of ACCORNICC Of TRIM REITRCTOS 44011 \ too OWN= ATI OP WAIMIOTON consultants project title: PROPOSED GOLF RAM FOR: SOLEMACENTEE1 GOLF OW. TENSWILA sheet title: PARTIAL SITE PLAN • revisions Job no: draw: checked: deo 8-18-94 sheet no: 3ECE4 SEP 2 8 DEVELOP:411,, I, date: D`igIC�'iw •t�ti`i'�• ��S %�ir :.'�.'G���_i't:Tjy n,Tm�nrtf rMTtn }•f4 ,nit r.'.±,••,•+;, ,,1't p4„, T: "i'arrr: 117.`'" CONTINUOUS METAL GUTTER (PAINT) METAL ROOFING -- .■■■■■■■■■■■■■u■■■■■irnium 1111es■■■■■■ mmirI ..: ldrl�- = �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIB��1111���1111��� CEDAR LAP SIDING WD TRIM VINYL FRAME INSj1LATED GLASS Et. N f ■■■■o. -"MUM ■•auimuumiiio■■ onus■■ 11■n■111■1■■■ia■ ■®11111ia■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■. ELEVATION 3/32 " =1' -0" I• - -- EAST ELEVATION 3/32" =1' -0" ri= EMPERED MASS 1! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, 1 1 111111111 1 II I III11111111'111111I FENCE 11 EXTEND TO PROTECTIVE NETTING 0 WEST ELEVATION 3/32' =1' -0" '5) '9) O 61AX GATE ACCESS TO zs D9DT51 Optc4 STATION SEA 3/16 —1' -0' ;.t - JJ� 0 architects Dnardlo design group . architects 1310 dexter ave. n auks, 200 settle, WA. 00100 (206)263-4704 ' NOT MI USICD. ML 11101f1I r1UONDO. M NO t Crs11f41 AND SPECIFICATIONS MC IDEAS OOIONS NO MAMMON Df 1P11otR TIO1uY A"C NM 11U10. SOWN m PROPERTY 0 1IK A1C1C1CCT. NO PINT MEMOS NOLL SC NflO0111Y•a. COPIED. OLD. PUICISNED. . M TMUT TIVPRION 3111101 CONSENT a MID NMOMM1L CONSOOMTION NKVIRCT. IOD I I INe VDI11 CONTACT 3111 M MOVE NNN1101 sKCOICNgN/ OWL DNIINNT[ OONCWNK tVCOKC'OI = SCC W 1Q ICSIDC110M sloe MP 01 WANg1ON consultants S TEES— EACH NT) NT) SY OWNER ..1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111■1111111111 11111111 ■111111■ ■1111111111111111■■■11/��� ��� ■ ■■■■ ■1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■1111■■ ■11 ■IMIIIM■1111■■M■ ■111111 ■11 ■1 ■111■11111111 ■11111111■11111111\.__ I le IN MI -IN. 1 1 : : :1•,film M... 1 1 1 a a, ... ■ ..■ MINN M 1 T T INI Mel .1- alMI III III ILI11 1•1111• MEM MIN ■ ■w m MUM MEI MI OEM TIITIT IR 191 HH IN MI MI 1 [ELIEyATION 3 32 =1' -0 r)f? T NOTE: THE LAP SIDING AND TRIM TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PER SOUTH ELEVATION B.A.R. APPROVED •OM E NITIALS,CL_ 195 -c ko project title: PROPOSED GOLF RANGE FOR: lS7©L1r OHO. TODG3WILA, WA sheet title: EETERBOR (ELEVATIONS na revision date: Job draw: checked: date, 2 -8 -95 III 111 111 1�1 Ill III 1II III 111 Ill I�I 111'lI ill 111 1 1 IlI Ill IlT lIl I�I I�I 111 I II I Ill ,1;, 1..1 12I 1 1.131. 11 -I. a1,,. 1 .,5 1 1 1 G1 nI ` I OIF. 6 8Iz� tlz:.Dlz 4Iz 11: taz • zlz [Iz. Gh; ij I NIL LI[ JI[ : mi mliuu uuluu uuluu milml mduu uuhm mduli uuhm mduu uuhul uuliul uuluu uuhul uulmi mllui A o 9 =RECEIVED SEP 2 R 1999 CiUIVIlYl U1VI r Y DEVELOPMENT.... NETTING BETWEE STATION WD TRIM (P WD TRIM EiARRIE f H xu J� HITTING 2X 1X HITTING / Hi- II"- -.-tt---------. ! SA FETY i', zs D9DT51 Optc4 STATION SEA 3/16 —1' -0' ;.t - JJ� 0 architects Dnardlo design group . architects 1310 dexter ave. n auks, 200 settle, WA. 00100 (206)263-4704 ' NOT MI USICD. ML 11101f1I r1UONDO. M NO t Crs11f41 AND SPECIFICATIONS MC IDEAS OOIONS NO MAMMON Df 1P11otR TIO1uY A"C NM 11U10. SOWN m PROPERTY 0 1IK A1C1C1CCT. NO PINT MEMOS NOLL SC NflO0111Y•a. COPIED. OLD. PUICISNED. . M TMUT TIVPRION 3111101 CONSENT a MID NMOMM1L CONSOOMTION NKVIRCT. IOD I I INe VDI11 CONTACT 3111 M MOVE NNN1101 sKCOICNgN/ OWL DNIINNT[ OONCWNK tVCOKC'OI = SCC W 1Q ICSIDC110M sloe MP 01 WANg1ON consultants S TEES— EACH NT) NT) SY OWNER ..1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111■1111111111 11111111 ■111111■ ■1111111111111111■■■11/��� ��� ■ ■■■■ ■1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■1111■■ ■11 ■IMIIIM■1111■■M■ ■111111 ■11 ■1 ■111■11111111 ■11111111■11111111\.__ I le IN MI -IN. 1 1 : : :1•,film M... 1 1 1 a a, ... ■ ..■ MINN M 1 T T INI Mel .1- alMI III III ILI11 1•1111• MEM MIN ■ ■w m MUM MEI MI OEM TIITIT IR 191 HH IN MI MI 1 [ELIEyATION 3 32 =1' -0 r)f? T NOTE: THE LAP SIDING AND TRIM TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PER SOUTH ELEVATION B.A.R. APPROVED •OM E NITIALS,CL_ 195 -c ko project title: PROPOSED GOLF RANGE FOR: lS7©L1r OHO. TODG3WILA, WA sheet title: EETERBOR (ELEVATIONS na revision date: Job draw: checked: date, 2 -8 -95 III 111 111 1�1 Ill III 1II III 111 Ill I�I 111'lI ill 111 1 1 IlI Ill IlT lIl I�I I�I 111 I II I Ill ,1;, 1..1 12I 1 1.131. 11 -I. a1,,. 1 .,5 1 1 1 G1 nI ` I OIF. 6 8Iz� tlz:.Dlz 4Iz 11: taz • zlz [Iz. Gh; ij I NIL LI[ JI[ : mi mliuu uuluu uuluu milml mduu uuhm mduli uuhm mduu uuhul uuliul uuluu uuhul uulmi mllui A o 9 =RECEIVED SEP 2 R 1999 CiUIVIlYl U1VI r Y DEVELOPMENT.... .I. NiC t:: PLANT -= LISt S ?>�/ r /e,a/ / Comma,t7 /Vdm - - �- 4ctr tar :*eon ' iZcd A('unxc1-' / 2Cd 'f ttr •Maple z-t" al/, 0! 0• ft in Ce.:m darer ' ,v ,u ? ' / r /6-./4/craw Plum Z/' a/, „25, ?/- CM-at-oft/MI (4/7G /c 7, cane, g' %17/!/. 01'J' 0 rrz4 II. s Atijil sgl•Aa' / runner /te . d, riJz Z" ;• @ Popu /e./s N jru ' /74/ /rte'/ Gcrnk1' ft it /a' min o!' X11 77x,0 12//Ca, i ,(/ Wcctcrn Qe 1 cedar e' min ; p� �� trecidaffu0 Mc/7zietri/ / Pa f/- 8' Min. �3•'E3 O , '/?7J •c% ri;� l�Jcr�rr/.�iro ' r -ire ' 2" Min, 1y erzfr-0/7 clean, Mar /c j NEr71 c Z7" m /n, 0 all deoa're,/, . L/rl /ePuc aa" m //7, e . Prilazd -. otro Gueken / orra cur, er/ taurc/ z/" m /n. • !/r&/rnr,/m ,�avrd // g�r/�on QzA /rte 7>U/',*at 'U,a'Cizior ,�ctcts��pheGac 1t-9t/ / :%i/7n/�i� /nne/� 4'�/S Ccz1ded 1414)/7 - ree par? / -/�roi c dG1 lawn - Sic min Fedra /- /ix ' i• / 7s ' / r'-- trer7s /vy 4 "ors 29 ". nc: 0 r hvi e2 , /- 4 -14/ /s ' I ,?jr9ir rda/ ,sr r'r/7 4G ' m /%7 Alk %/ _L \ II LANDSCAPE PLAN / Planting pit min. twice size of root ball • 6' min. • nigt �IIF= Prone diseased and, , broken branches .:,! 18 gauge steel WIre through clear viny$, 'hose below first crotch ,I 2x2 wooNn stakes securely driven Into ' ground.• Stain brown: Waterbaeinwith 2' mulch , nu Unglaiu planting pill sunaco 12 planting mix 8 •, • 12 native soil water thoroughly. fertilize, TREE PLANTING DETAIL Deciduous trees.and evergreen_ trees under 8' . Walor basin stilt 2 mulch • �r I Prune diseased a�' r broken bran ris� pactod planting mix. water thoroughly, fertilize as required Panting hole min. twice . stze of root bas SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL �mir-a C /�raiiry • - G/m/t' of C/a/My) ea I\ dr i ftgor • 1. eubgrsd.I.•includinq berms; to.within1 /10th foot provided by general contractor, unless otherwise noted. 2 Subgrads .hall.be scarified or rototilled if conditions require' fit, r 1.1..• d "; depth ;topsoil in all •planting. areas.. ` .4 . 2" depth fit grade. bark mulch in all planting beds. .6 - .All: plent'aaterial.shall•be .healthy, -full and confors•to USA standard for "•.nursery stock, latest edition.' 6• t Plan lsatsrial-or.siae or kinnet available may b.. .. substituted only with :app d•roval of landscape architect or • owner •:;,aa5,J.,, • 7. • • 'Al1,aaislplatitinga'shall have triangular spacing. 6.. 'All tram pits shall be inspectod'to insure proper drainage. 19. .POSitideldrainage,shall be maintained. Mound planting areas minima 12" 110. Shrub. /endittress. minimum 42" from curb for oar yterhang unlaas =vluelstops•notad. • • 5" ',with bark wowing strip where lawn i adjacent' to building �. ; '''. . ••12.' Landsoaps contractor shall aa4Yein� until final e inspection rand'acceptance.b�l'bbwwnnee.' Plant• . • Panting bad z>yi 1/2 spacing distance ivoYAydvAa �t7 :.. . ht GROUNDCOVER+ PACING DETAIL Triangular spacing \ 74 • Oka* 4/0,4 Water basin. I VW/gulch I S VERGREEN THE Over 8' Prune diseased and broken branches /7: 8 gauge wire through 'clean vInyt hdse 3 2x2 stakes apeced et. equal intervals' V2 planting mix r l 12 native moll, Planting pit twirls size of root bail PLANTING DETAIL • -� NV (0 AZA /•S I/ yokel it) e v 2 474 /e:is -- O— n.•O7000.W.C.s•ao iVe 1" = 30' -0" a • 'N1 a ■ e +c0000r�.ecg•aouo•a• Uoeveoq?..o.- *ooae +•ce:+oe I t7CGf2fCr r r/f/ae ltiaivr7 7/7:S d / /"c:7/6d'7 ?taxer de r/ /r"/4-/t/an pf'r /rh /sreira `I ;r Che arm H6rure� -ted4..1A`? > / /S dir�c7g2t» B.A.R• 1I/OA� PROVED DATE yi- INITIALS�(14� 1_95'-006o DIarchitects Ilnardie dwmlpn proep . architects 1310 dsxterr awe. n suite 200, .wattle. WA. 02100 (2013)210-4704 NOT INANANOD±A11. lame NOWM. Ite MOM ONNA M T AND ODAT" d AIO 01 0 Mee NO O P000R TN ACNV Ale W OWL NOW Or M MIC xrwr. NO WIT TMMC/ . . R o COrm WITCO DOOLOSO ON DCTrnmm T SOLO. I NalelOD. OR OTI MMxe i Mw MEMNON MOTP WSW Or MO ARNOIa"R 001/OpNM,•11SO,SNa sine WORM VOCAL CONTACT MM M Aa 0 Y 0lN O▪ [PDIO[T01MV laalMONNI S Oa11aJISNi OYaO 01 consultants ,•.11.fi.7Lt.. STATE • .WASHINGTON' . REGISTERED", . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT (Go-t ) KENNETH E LONEY .. CERTIFICATE _NO.303 , project title: sheet title: LANDSCAPE PLAN Fe..., 'pa* 4:4,4 7130- cite x74 /yes no revisions dated. lobnc dravPg.„.., !o/veY checked • • • 74 r : `i'r a"I:'i. ' 'l i•t:i'� ,, ... I IIIIII II1111S11IIII IIII'IiIIl12l I!ISISIIIilll3ll11111•I-S hillh lll'�IISIIII•I.sIIIIISIIIIISII6 III0It IIIIIII3I1Z I111181III, I IIILI7I,II; II IIU plijlr. p11,1Y111 Z plp8l7p, plp-7l7 p1111I11Z; I.IOI;III6II 1 111118II1 I IIIIILI1 I IIIII 8II1t l llIII r sheet no CC \Itib ;EP 28199r1'. • OEVELOPM NT 5 35rnmDraWin g# 5mm Drawing# 7 -0 131D a xt aw :'rc wilt .� I M at11w:' Wii:; 9SiO• OOSNIb-47�4,1 CEDAR LAP SIDING WD TRIM VINYL FRAME INS LATED GLASS sultanti MPERED GLASS GATE ACCESS TO EOM ELEVATION . 3/32 " =1' -0" 2O' -G' MAX 3 ha 2X WO TRIM (P .1X WD.TRIM..'(P HITTING BARRIE- BY OWNER SAFELY NET irga-111111111111111111111111 ,III 111111111 II 11111 II FE 110 EXTEND TO CTIVE NETTING 1NIF SiT f I [y'' EAST ELE NlATDON 3/32" =1' -0 .t . SII ir�1 project title!.4 D GOLF . Gana FOR: GOLF LIB O! I©. 31 ' B.A.R. `K �t'•, APPROVED DATE (/ /kINITIALSKL` Co C o Qs Not__ 6 (..ok_ 3oA i; GLASS C.C.em L✓i.vDoc.a>= k,MncrE 7324M. ro,;r• • +..,'.�.kf 117 6A,WA 6LA-YC44 ACCG*AT - '"',;,"'r"0 :e ;l a"udiJ , ,;.771 ! E'47"'7 1="..— imam' 16"111M.1111.1..I.1 MOM MINN MM •I T -IT 1•119191 MMM U ■ ■% MINI: N(�f thl EL VAT11,6jN 3 32 =1' -0 NOTE: THE LAP SIDING AND TRIM TO BE PROVIDED AT AU. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PER SOUTH ELEVATION RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 2 5 1995 not revldona lob no: dram checked: PERMIT CENTER date: 2 -8 -95 III II II'II Ill I 11ti1. 1111111 I . I. 1 I'I_!�II ; .11.1.1 . _IL. ' 11 1Ir1te 1 1(1 ' 1 I'' 4 11 11 T 2 G� az 1. LIy Dly 9IZ 117 • fa7, ..yly • IZ Dlr, 1l 8I LII DI[ m1 mlhm Imluu mduu mllml uulml mlhm uuluu uuhul uu {im ullliul mllliu uuIuu uuluu Iluluu milli southcenter driving Fixture . Grid Range'. •Vertica1600,. Spillsouth Vert600 -30ft Vert600 -45ft .. 13uan t V ty Curve 14 42 8391 Feet /Footcandles' Average. Max M11) 4".17 39,9 0.354 10.7 19.0 3.40 1.06 2.69 0.000 13,2 37,3 3.12 10.9 37.3 2.75 Snit Lum LLF Design Lum 110000 0,676 74360 Avg /Min .Max /Min 11.8,. >'100 3,16 5,60 > 100 > „100 4,22 ':11 9 3,98 1 3.6 CV 0.997 0,546 0,624 0,804 0.876 #PoInts 704 17 88 17 17 GE DOES NOT RECOMMEND THIS LAYOUT: GE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR RESULTANT`; GLARE OR . SPILL LIGHT. THIS LAYOUNEBOESL IfOlS MEERQE$sTRECOMMENDATIONS.. 3454 ,439 ,600 129 ,567 ,003.',648 .683 ,685 ,704 ,782 ,769 /54'.1716 ,758 ,753 ,753 ,742 ,744 .736 ,730 .7:1 ,714 :7O0.701 700 .702 .695. •� 433 .539'.613 .698 .697 .740 ,786..810 .824 .643 .890 .911 .902 .826 .888 .879 .820 .860 .863 .891 .832 ,821 .830 .626•.816.817 .821 ,799 .786 .796 587 .889 .782 .604 .853 ,908'.951 .968 .983 103 117 108 1.05 1.04,1.04'1.03 1.01 1.01 .991 .981 . 962 . 926 .974 ,922 f962 .967 .955 .983 .919 .932 874,843 .949 101 117,113,1.15 3.19 119 116 110'118 113 1.26 113.1'11 118 1,97 116 1.15 1,14 1.95 1.16 1,14',1.14 1,¶5 112 1.08 1.GB 1.09 662 1.18 1.20 1.29 1,85 1.80 1.91 1X44 1.97 116 118 1.52 181 181 1.96 112 1.38 1.39 t.39 1.88 L88 1.90 110 1.37,.1.39 L39 L31 1.28 1.26 1.29 12 1.41.1.67 117 151 153 156 159 114 193 110 1.88 118 1.82 151 118 114 116 118 118 118 151118 118816 i68 1,63 1.55 112 112 113 46 1.64 :2.03 2.13 2.17 2.15 2.19 2.24 2.29 2.35 2.31 2.30 2.28 2.12 2.02 2.00 1.98 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.06 2.04 2.07 "2.04 1.93 1.87 1.62 1.81 1.86 90 2.39 2.61 2.70 216215252 257 2.85 267 285 2.83 2.70 2.97 2.83216 214 2,50 2.51 2.53 2.53 2.51 2.54 2.14_112 2.32 2.22 2.18 2.21 280 523.163.913413, 323. 283. 383.. 913503 ,533.543.393..32952.912.893. 023. 073.143.133. 103 .133.163 :10r22762.832.232742.21 .,315 421 4.93 417 4,09 4.11 4.20 4.53 433 418 4.33 4.01 353 315' 318 3.55 3.22 3.54 3:92 3.87 318 3.02 3,94 3,27- 0 3 24 3,14 321 3.51 368 43 6.60 5.83 5.27 5.09 5.19 521 5.215.32 5.41 5,15 473 443 4.24 4.23 439 470 4.89 4.87 485 485444'4.6i 4.61 411377 390424 447 470 . 82716612:6196. 3116856.268. 396 .396566065855.175065.125.425. 926. 076. 006. 035. 915. 898 .025134.744.995015.555185.84 6,82 712 710 7.187,587.307.557.867. 466.696. 106. 156. 026.256.667.267.397.257386. 956. 057 .176.995145506.627.146.258.21 17 9.56 9.06 814852 909 816 811 851 818 746 616 717 7.47 81119.97 853 819 915 918 812 7,43 7.877.48 6.93 754 810 818 715 7.20 7.8 11,3 13.9 12,7 11..8 13,3 1 13 12.6 11.2.9,88 9.16 516 9.44 9.83 1.4 12.0 10.9 12,8 1 13 12.7 11,5 8.25 7.96 8.39 10•S 9.92 10.9 12.2 8.0 8.54 0.9 23.7.20.9 22.0 15.9 22.9 16.1 202 19 0 12.7 162 10,8 13.9 13.3 15,5 21,5 14„3 21,4 166 123 21.2 106 10.1 .8.21 14.1 14.0 12.8 22,3 13,3 11,9 604 .6.58 .722 .7331.729 .820 .896 .927 .917 .922 .961 .931 .690 .78 6 .938 .968 1.05 1.12 1.15 1.10 1.06 1.00 .86 1.31 1.28 1.22 1.95 .92 802 .805 .82 923 .934 .961 102 1.05 109 1.16 1.. f .09 1.10 1.16 1.21 h24 1.27 1.25 1.96 1.48 1,52 161 1.2 1.29 1.33 190 1.44 1.95 1.52 1.62 1.20 1.69 1.79 1.28 1.61 129 1.2 57 1,65 1.20 1:23 1.24 1.82 1.91 1.2? 1.99 2.93 2.08 1.85 1.'3 1.9 1,95 2.04 2.07 2.08 2.92 2.97 2.24 2.32 229 2.52 2.91 2.20 2.02 1.5 7.94 2.50 2.51 2.53 2.50 2.57 2.64 2.23 2.85 2.88 2.26 2.81 2.28 1.2 303 3.05'3.08 3.04 3.55 3.05 3.15 3.17 3..2_8 3.25 3.28 3.05 2.58 2.0" .82 3.83 3.72 3.60 3.61 3.70 3.74 3.65 3.63 3.73 3.91 3.55 2.99 2.4 4.79 4.85 4.36 4.23 4.37 4.49 418 4.04 401 4.35 4.57 4,07 3.50 2.7 5.25 5,514. 964, 875. 225. 244 .854.394.805145.284.223.2529 .226215. 825. 575. 985. 685 .124.575.918,306124.263.303.0 716 7.14 611 615 6.84 6.13 5.54 4.56 6.84 6.91 5.94 4.19 3.88 2.8 8.16 9.99 9.84 707 7.21 8.20 759 8,07 6.81 6.58 5.55 5.21 4.93 4,3 3.59 12.1 16.5 10211,6 8.01 13,9 11,6 6.21 4.47 6.21 9.16 6.15 7.9 0 (4 •) (40.0) " (74o•O) ('+040) (400, (745:o) ' (. o) (A) (4 0) (5,�� , .", (,I'5.6) (�5 1) _ • (P1�?�) (4) (A) (A) (y 5b) (4!?)) • (' 2)) 040'.3531.0..26 1.♦3 1.51 1 81 1.99 1.59 1,97 1.89 1,8 1.86 1.57 1.86 1.56 1.♦9 1.8 .1 91 2.. 1 2.28 2.62 2.♦7 230:1.97 1.08 .952 1. ♦86 2.69 2.14 • X40 .989.35 .916 .895 .732.800 ,10 1.74 1.225 .681 .384 .231.55 • 00 040 .114 .311 .510 .786 .685 .998 .691 .959 .984 . 725'. 984 . 686 . 986 ,863 .859 1.03 .890 1.28 1.13 131 1.20 114'1.23 .892 .535 .607 1.37 1.30 756 .528 . 405 .298 .329 . 280 .253 .284 .393 .598 329 .222 .152 .108 SCALE soL s��o �Illlil Illllliii 11gi111112ii111ip.p.p. 11111.1'Il, 1. 1 11TC1. h. I. I. y. I .trl.1.1.1.1.1.111'tl'!'[Iti111 � � i �1 -. I 4f� 41 IJl n'1 i` I OIF, 61 BIZt LI7. . 9( - 9(Z- . 1�7, ' £�Z • ZIZ...T�Z:":.Q�Z; .SIT 8IT LII 91 1111 ii11111 I nllhlll IIIIIIIII 11171111 iiiilllll lllllilll IIIIhI�1111dhnifmltml1ud11I1 onion hill mdml 1111111 101! uentrol Electric Con, ne^Sc UOhttn •ivnlnl,in �NC '4 /39 USA GE AutoLITCAD 1.00 Provided By: GE Lighting Engineering 3010 Spartanburg Hwy P.O. Box 4506 Hendersonville; NC 28739 USA Phone: (704) 693 -2200 Fax: (704) 693 -2103 Provided For GREG FRENCH MILUGAN SALES SEATTLE Calculated light levels are based on specific information that has been supplied to GE. Any differences in luminoire installation, lighted area geometry and obstructions in the lighted area may produce different results from the predicted values. Normal tolerances of voltage, tamp output, and ballast and luminaire manufacture will, affect results. Ref: MS W -61 -1986 Identifying Operating Factors for HID Luminaires SOUTHCENTER DRIVING RANGE POWRSPOT III LUMINAIRES 1000W METAL HALIDE W /GLARE CONTROL 45 FT POLES MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FC'S AT GROUND ON RANGE AND MAINTAINED VERTICAL FC'S. AT 600 FT FROM TEE AREA Designer: L.R. MCCALL GE Layout Reference SW3 -95019 Sheet: Date/Time Drawn:• .. 1 OF 1 12/5/95 10:55 AM Drawing Number: Rev: SW35019A 01 1.9s---me)