Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L95-0063 - EXTENDED STAY AMERICA - DESIGN REVIEWL9.5-0063 EXTENDED STAY INN '15451 53RD AV S City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director SUPPLEMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared March 18, 1996 Meeting Date: March 28, 1996 Project: Extended Stay Inn Applicant: Royce A. Berg, A.I.A. LPN Architects Proposal: Locations Staff: Approve the applicant's revised proposal to construct a 30,000 square foot three (3) -story hotel 15451 53rd Avenue South (Southcenter Boulevard and Highway 518) Alexa Berlow, Associate Planner Attachments: (Continuation from Staff Report 2/16/96...) W. Revised Site Plan X. Revised Building Plan Y. Revised Exterior Elevations Z. Revised Site Section (1) AA. Revised Site Section/Roof Plan (2) BB. Revised Site Light Plan/Roof Plan CC. Revised Exterior showing glare DD. Revised Schematic Landscape Plan EE. Revised Sign Specifications and Color Scheme (5 sheets) To be presented at hearing: Color Board Base Stucco Finish Presentation Drawings 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 tie v:.+a.:1.i•L.'.r�. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS BACKGROUND On February 22, 1996, the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) deferred Design Review application for a new 30,000 square foot hotel. It was thought that a deferral decision would give the applicant additional time to complete requested materials and revise drawings as per conclusions recommended to the Board by DCD staff . The proposal was scheduled for a special review on March 7, 1996. At the request of the applicant, additional changes were made to the proposal and the decision was made by senior staff to bring the review date back to the BAR hearing on March 28, 1996. Since the last hearing, amendments were made to the description of existing development and vegetation conditions, as per discussions with the applicant. These changes should read as follows (changes are underlined): Section: Vicinity /Site Information Item B: Existing Development The site is currently vacant. It is hilly and slopes from a high of 73% on the north side of the site, with a small area adjacent to the creek where the slope is 200 %. The east side has slopes up to 69% and the south side of the site generally slopes from 13% to 29 %, with a slightly steeper slope of 32% in the southeast corner of the site. No portion of this site slopes to the west. A creek currently exists on the north side of the site (along Southcenter Boulevard). However, while the current proposal would grade the site between 8 and 12 feet, grading would not occur in the creek area. Item C: Vegetation The site is currently covered with deciduous and evergreen trees, grass, and fruit bushes. Songbird have been observed near the site. The proposal would remove 12 -14 trees along with grass and weed. New trees will be added, and significant trees and buffer vegetation will be preserved, two (2) trees on the southeast comer the site and three (3) tree in the northwest corner. :• v::. 1i�:.:: t-: isSi. k..!a,.;X.n;;:.;:..,�;..;..�;�: ;b::�_ _ - .S•,„ +t.�.ra. ,...t:r?.r �r .,•�,� . .nom:,. .,, ° raa 2 z � Iu RI 0 0± CO 0 .N W: ;w => w 0' J; LL Q': co Z �F O. D o; O Nt 0 F-, .uJ z•. w N, 0 1- z Revisions to the proposal since February 22, 1996 include the following: 1. The proposed number of units was increased by 6, from 90 to 96, and 12 parking spaces were added to the 97 stalls originally proposed, for a total of 109 stalls. The additional spaces are proposed for an off -site, shared parking lot. Easements to use the lot have been obtained. 2. Augment the landscape plan along 51st Avenue South and along the east side of the site, between the proposed hotel and adjacent commercial buildings, as part of a sidewalk extension added to connect the new parking area to the site. 3. Revise building design to reduce bulk and scale of structure in relation to the site size, topography, and to the character and scale of adjacent land uses. 4. Revise lighting plan to include sidewalks on and off -site, and to show impact of potential glare effects on adjacent land uses. 5. Submit specifications for signs, specifically wall- mounted sides on elevations and at entries to site, and directional signs to and within the site boundary. Following are findings specific to the aforementioned revision. These findings highlight only where supplemental revisions have occurred and where staff has undertaken additional review. FINDINGS (1) Site Planning (a) The proposal is in accordance with the existing topography of the site. (b) The proposal will remove 12 -14 trees along with grass and weeds. Trees will be added throughout the periphery of the site. Five (5) existing trees on south end will be preserved and three (3) additional trees will be reserved along the northwest corner, including a hemlock, oak, and maple tree. (c) Provisions have been made to use landscaping and building design to facilitate pedestrian circulation within the site, particularly around the immediate periphery of the building to guest rooms and amenities (picnic area, vending machines, news stand). Provisions for pedestrian travel have also been incorporated to provide desirable transition from the building to the edge of the site. (d) The revised plans continue to propose a strong entry to the site, both at the 53rd street entrance and on the east side of the site. 3 ,� uJ 6 Jo o O; p; :co w J; CD LL w u. *t �.w. w ion; w w' p • z. v c& z..... (f) Landscape treatment continues to be planned for the entire perimeter of the site. Focal areas now include: the west side of the site along 53rd Avenue South, the south end of the site where site geography is heavily sloped as well as a proposed picnic area adjacent to the south end of the building. (g) See: (2) Building Design regarding landscape treatment. (h) Structural modulations, particularly along the east and west sides of the building, successfully reduce the visual impact of large paved areas for parking. Service areas are proposed for the west side of the site. (I) See: (2) Building Design (2) Building Design (a -e) The revised building design exhibits modifications around the entire periphery of the building and provides visual interest at key points of the building, such as at the entry and on the north and south facades. On the east facade of the building, wall signs were relocated from the roof and incorporated into the main entry canopy. On the north and south facades of the building, modifications are apparent in the increased slope of the roof at each corner and the addition of windows on the south facade. Modifications to the roof line of the building increase the appearance of modulations, a measure that succeeds in reducing the bulk and scale of the structure and encourage greater contextual building design. The proposed color scheme and surface texture further contribute to successfully integrate the site within the surrounding area by blending the structure with natural features of the site. (3) Landscape and Site Treatment (a -b) The proposed landscape plan will continue to incorporate natural topographic patterns and significant vegetation into the project design. Additional modifications to the west side have been approved by the Department of Public Works, to add planting along the edge of the city right -of -way, particularly at the northwestern edge of the site to increase the buffer between the proposed hotel and residential property nearby. (c -d) The proposal currently allocates 60% of surface space to parking. Landscaping and structural treatments will be augmented, as well as along the building along the west side of the site. These features have been added to help establish a hierarchy of, strengthen vistas and important views, provide shade, and break up visual mass. Walkways adjacent to the building will function as primary pathways to guest rooms and to parking along the periphery of the building. . "141 �l.'.iu•':i:l�iilti i4: �; 1i n.Yrif:S:G:.:]c.,.:aiu .u..i< 4 cc 2 O • 0: co 0 uji w O w Q; w z Z vo '0 Ni. 0 Hi w w ,, • 0 t- . z, (4) Miscellaneous Structures (d) Lighting: An exterior lighting site plan and lighting design specifications have been submitted and reviewed by planning staff. The impact of glare on adjacent land uses was of concern and discussed with the applicant for this proposal. Revisions meet criteria for lighting fixtures and glare impact and the extent to which a lighting plan is an integral part of the building architecture. (e) Signs: The sign plan proposed for this site consists of 5 (five) signs: one (1) pole sign; three (3) wall signs, and one (1) sign on the canopy of the entrance to the building. Building elevations illustrate how the signs will be incorporated into the overall design and how it will meet general location and size requirements of the Sign Code. However, approval of signs are subject to the approval of a sign permit, to be submitted separately to the Department of Community Development. CONCLUSIONS Since the initial submittal of this proposal , a number of revisions have been made to the proposed plan and many challenges have been undertaken by both the applicant and staff to meet multi - family design guidelines for a property zoned for commercial use. Major improvements have been made to the proposal, specifically to site planning, building design, and landscaping, and site treatment. Following is a description of these improvements: Site Planning The proposal will provide a site design that supports the integration of landscaping and building design to facilitate pedestrian circulation, including provisions for pedestrian travel to provide desirable transitions from the building to the edge of the site. The proposal will provide a strong entry to the site. Landscape treatment will be augmented to emphasize focal areas along the west and east sides of the site. Structural modulations will be incorporated as a guiding design principal of the proposal in order to achieve greater integration of the plan with the site topography and with the character and scale of the surrounding area. Modulation will also serve to reduce the impact of large paved parking areas. Building Design The revised building site plan and building design will modify the roof line of the building to increase the appearance of modulation, and make other revisions to details of design in the slope of the roof line, the treatment of windows, and reinforcing the main entry as part of this overall goal. The color and surface texture scheme should work to enhance this. 5 Landscaping and Site Treatment The revised landscape plan will be augmented along the east and west sides of the site in order to help establish a hierarchy of spaces, strengthen vistas and important views, provide shade, and break up visual mass. Walkways should function as primary pathways to guest rooms and other focal areas of the site. A lighting plan will be completed to properly light the site, building, and interior walkways, as well as include measures to reduce glare onto adjacent properties. A preliminary sign plan will be review by the Board for hotel/motels, highway businesses, and also for review of the proposed design and color. All signs are subject to review and approval of a sign permit, to be submitted to the Department of Community Development as a separate application. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division recommends approval of the proposed project. If the Board wishes to review any and all revisions, they should say so in their motion, otherwise any revisions will be subject to approval by the DCD Director. 6 ~g. OAK - - - -. ROCKET 5 7 �\ \•s SEEVER LLOC , +�� \ EXISTING .ROCKERY \ \\ \ ' \� �' \ . rate, \, II , \� ,` ~ ... \ .. ENTRY j II toc RETAINING VALL .� ._ _..� n '-'^� \\ Ni EXISTING ``,�"- DIOSVALE7' r- _. t-`1. \.\\ EA]EIRRL1IINE a•/ ' .9 / / �• 'y N 00'.54'71• I k\/\\ \ ,e'E ISTING T- i j ..� 4 SEVER L\NE VERIFY ROCKERY 4'NNAtI j \`"e \ \ \.�..� �� _ _. ia.•r / �' l SSEE EVIL DRAINAGE \ \ \� • _ I •='I ' EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 1 : EXISTING ` ■ PRIVATE DRIVE • • U • • N • U J ENTRY PIER I N.T.S. NOTES: 1. PARKING LOT LIGHTING STANDARDS LIMITED TO 20' IN HIGHT 2. SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY TRIAD ASSOCIATES DATED SEPTEMBER 09, 1991 FOR EASEMENTS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS SITE. UPDATED PRELIMINARY SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS JUNE 22. 1995 ROCKERY. 4' to 90 - UNITS + 6 - UNITS SERVICE /OFFICE SITE AREA PARKING +97 STALLS IMPERVIOUS AREA REGULAR 63 STALLS 9' % 19' (2FT. OVERHANGE) PERVIOUS AREA COMPACT 28 STALLS 8' X 16' M.C. 5 STALLS 13' X 20' NATURAL AREA LOADING 1 STALL 10' X 32' UNTOUCHED BUILDING AREA 1ST FLOOR 9,724 S.F. 2N0 FLOOR 9,724 S.F. 3RD FLOOR 9.724 S.F. TOTAL: 29,172 S.F. 87,976 S.F. - 2.01 ACRE W 52,424 S.F. t 35,552 S.F.- 40% t 15,732 S.F. PRESERVED TREES 05 NORTH SITE PLAN 120'1 1 Lqsoc,3 "•''. "v' _...::`$ ?. , .r.Y GivFSeflaYd F3" 'EiSF,�liEi� _'NC, Viifyilti',N5`'b' e" Q V 00: coo: cum. . W q O. u. a. • I- =.. Z I•- O. Z U� OL rxl •I- V, ~O z.. ; =•. O ~: Z TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. Architecture and Planning Rota A Brp ALA NW"' Y. Ron K.h 1201 - 4b Ave. 0. 02 Sena& We hgtan 98134 (206) 50.3 -6020 NO DESCRIPTION DATE GRADING REV. 12 -15 -95 RAMP k STAIRS 01 -19 -96 BIOSWALE & STORM 01 -25 -96 ENTRY STAIRS 01 -29 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 01 -31 -96 BAR -ENTRY DR. REV. 02 -13 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -14-96 SITE PLAN Far. 98024 \HOTLSITE In' JOB NO.: 16614 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 1141141 A DRAWN: 114 A -1 CHECK: Lqsoc,3 "•''. "v' _...::`$ ?. , .r.Y GivFSeflaYd F3" 'EiSF,�liEi� _'NC, Viifyilti',N5`'b' e" Q V 00: coo: cum. . W q O. u. a. • I- =.. Z I•- O. Z U� OL rxl •I- V, ~O z.. ; =•. O ~: Z GABLE BEYOND SOUTH ELEVATION ,—ENTRY AWNING SEE TUBEART DRAWINGS I linill / � ®� 1A11111 IIIII II 'I - ��.. i-.n � -, - /. ❑ \$y li /f \I rR 1. li jtBl@jiI_.._I ,ii ur;n ,...alas r� "1 ni b lr'�..y.Ilgga IClll 1111 la mil• .._.- . IMIN ,i 1 MI mum 11:01111■MMI I lIi El MIN _�� SOUTH ELEVATION ,—ENTRY AWNING SEE TUBEART DRAWINGS I Nr[1voilo Sp \a A / � ®� IIIII I! 'I - ��.. i-.n � -, - /. ❑ \$y li /f \I rR 1. li jtBl@jiI_.._I ,ii ur;n ,...alas r� "1 ni b lr'�..y.Ilgga IClll 1111 I'n: Jcr I H mil• .._.- . III Mir El — _�� \l; 1 1 ,ri�l aI r 1�iPf;,I rr\: �:i�,r1. { I , — - ...- 'n —ii iiii';;;lii1i; i�l-1111111111=11 :Niii iiM: R CYCLE NORTH ELEVATION ENCLOSURE CR OR Q2ED EXTERI ,A, INSULATED FINISH SYSTEM COLORED TRASH ENCLOSURE WHITE FRAMED WINDOWS PRE - FINISHED RAILINGS PAINTED DOORS Z I ~QQ W 0▪ 0: U) W W I: J ~ U) IL, W O' g LL Q: N d' I— Ui Z 1— ' Zi—' W W'; V ° V • W.F W Z, Y2 0. Z .. WEST ELEVATION , MA TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES Architecture 'and Planning NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -1h9 PE FA, ili ,i`� ■ ,.IIII I'll 1'II'II "dGI, 'HI I ii; ki a IIIII 1181 II. ill 'I -nt I'I1 "II!II'Ill1 II II'81'I,ii i Ii[iii III!IIIIIIi[II III III''I IIIIIIIIIIIII'II ifir— IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'llllllllll UII'IIJ16118'I11111Illllillll1116111111111111111111111111111 IIIIilliliillillllllllll d -‘11 al' UI'lllllll 1 IIIIIIIIIII 1111111lllll ll IIII'I1111,1IlIId111U IId61ii;1'' 1111111' 111111111111111111111111611111111ii01III Iql II'P " "n. 1. IN 11111111 I.. 111 ...,,I . �I '',11.114, 1111'' I EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 11 /81 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIGN LOCATIONS FlIe:95024 \HELEVSI h/A' JOB NO.: 0000{ DATE: 014144 DRAWN, OD CHECK: Las - ccxe3 SHEET NO OF: A -7 Nr[1voilo Sp \a A / � ®� 'I - ��.. i-.n � -, - /. ❑ \$y li /f \I rR 1. li jtBl@jiI_.._I ,ii ur;n ,...alas r� "1 ni b lr'�..y.Ilgga IClll , ,ran � ' � � � (" :ii:IICC f o' \ "ia C:L_3 :7:. �%n Pia* :3C {,Ii �i iT; , Min ra lgeelri �� : fga > I I �I I., i I'n: Jcr I H ;r - -. • ^ .......\- V; \I .,./ r' xTi!I :,II I.r,n,: ,. i : i,T,a' IUi Ilia „„,:,II ,Ill 1111111111 II. IIIII'' 1.1 il Ilk..iibil1'IIII'11'11111 \ 11 I �sallnes1lrin�i :hi � =I i ��,� ' . n "IIII fill II'II�„II aiii1IIIII hii�ii l = 11 t''j 4_iI,/5'i! E�,,-�;i ' a;' 11III111111IIIIII11 ,iIIlc11'iI,IIIIIII111111IIIIII 11111111 PIO !oh 11I111�iia6C8r111111111I11 111111111 \l; 1 1 ,ri�l aI r 1�iPf;,I rr\: �:i�,r1. { I , — - I '.. TI!1!1,I lib, \[ : �1 mi�� 1 I 1 I I } f II l 1 L � 1. IN_ Ilrs,,,' 1.1 1. �( i .1 f Ili 1 ..I .I - �-1 _ �- L' / _..Y . ` ; I III .1. I .9!i ! \ I 1: Ili 3 II :Or ' rem iilul { li I ![1. ;1 1,..,1 1•v. 1 "1 } Il I �:CI:� ,t „,.i I. ,.1' 1 t I 1 . .7 :.1 . 11 ...,1 � rl WEST ELEVATION , MA TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES Architecture 'and Planning NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -1h9 PE FA, ili ,i`� ■ ,.IIII I'll 1'II'II "dGI, 'HI I ii; ki a IIIII 1181 II. ill 'I -nt I'I1 "II!II'Ill1 II II'81'I,ii i Ii[iii III!IIIIIIi[II III III''I IIIIIIIIIIIII'II ifir— IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'llllllllll UII'IIJ16118'I11111Illllillll1116111111111111111111111111111 IIIIilliliillillllllllll d -‘11 al' UI'lllllll 1 IIIIIIIIIII 1111111lllll ll IIII'I1111,1IlIId111U IId61ii;1'' 1111111' 111111111111111111111111611111111ii01III Iql II'P " "n. 1. IN 11111111 I.. 111 ...,,I . �I '',11.114, 1111'' I EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 11 /81 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIGN LOCATIONS FlIe:95024 \HELEVSI h/A' JOB NO.: 0000{ DATE: 014144 DRAWN, OD CHECK: Las - ccxe3 SHEET NO OF: A -7 61ST AVE..S. 120' 110' 1 UM ENTRY SECTION •-■( EMM -gig ��tPJi s•iii _. CMNASI DOT 20S SLOPE • t IDD SLWE SY SLI PE/ O 5 102' 51ST AVE. S. 130' 120' • • 110' 10' • ES' OIIVEWAY W • OVCEMMG c,. -V '-O• IV ID OVCBVAL A, 25-0' .IVEVAY 51• • SOUTH - SECTION A -A LOOKING NORTH J 0 130' 120' TIM AIR D.61 1 p11YE ..- u arFafTr-1" COST PWNIIL- 110' 102' 130' 1-120 0.61 I PARSING ROSVALE ZS' DRIVEWAY IV HC. STALLS A5'- 0',"-0'i. • 44'-0' J"- Mc' -4' It' ID OVOIDAL ri-C' DRIVEWAY A IP • OV1>DVIL 24. -O• t 110' 4 RAC. 100' NORTH - SECTION B -B LOOKING NORTH SITE SECTIONS 1 10' I 1 TUKWILA WASHINGTON FO EXTENDED TAY AMERICA, 4. *Aitt t Arc lt.ctur. and Planning ABu . ALA Prindpd Krt1K.OAh. S. 110 1101 - 4th An. S. 1101 (206) 563- 8030. NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 01 -51 -96 B.AR. REVISIONS 02 -14-96 SITE. SECTIONS F11: 95024 \SITESEC2 1.20 JOB NO.: 51614 SHEET NO OP: DATE: 41141 DRAWN: IIM A-4 CHECK: a. 118' wire Maw 110' --I—�- 90' *NEW* 2.75 55200 152 55200 102 55200 52 55200��� a 120' 110' L100' EXTENDED STAY W' Zi O>- OU z� 4C W tW .z. U- F- IrL m•r ra era IIe1VEVAr SECTION C -C LOOKING i 0 2 f PA1190 90' 80' 70' WEST 110 1 2 Architecture cog Planning Nom A Boy Y. K. Chin. ALL PrNdpal 1201 - 4th Are. S. /102 (S4oat1 � . 00134 NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -14 -OS DETENTION POND SECTION D -D LOOKING WEST ROOF PLAN 120'1 4 SITE SECTIONS 110'1 3 SITE. SECTIONS ELEVATION ROOF PLAN F114: OS024 \SITESECI IS' JOB NO.: 00004 SHEET NO OF: DATE: ta.>� A C DRAYM: 0p /� -v CHECK: t9S-rz.3 111 101 Ir • 0V000 ` -155 x 32,0' a t monW POI 52,i, . 90 DETENTION POND SECTION D -D LOOKING WEST ROOF PLAN 120'1 4 SITE SECTIONS 110'1 3 SITE. SECTIONS ELEVATION ROOF PLAN F114: OS024 \SITESECI IS' JOB NO.: 00004 SHEET NO OF: DATE: ta.>� A C DRAYM: 0p /� -v CHECK: t9S-rz.3 SR -5 \....:z. • Ls. o oA,NtM w. l& ra...talMourn. ASIA 11323 3WW Ilkh ha mm OM SWIM r KW MW.rw IWI•LLI. 1.w,. NMI WSW Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates 51ST AVENUE SOUTH N .2 18 /91I / /�% (41 1 �lC�!► / r.. • AErfr • LLrr..��E�L/I�a.{�1 2 4:p�{�� - i ' 4!00. I' SI \�\ \ 11 -' \ \ \ \\ :4P . ,.•. /./' .. 11 ea \ \� ofori- SOUTHCENTER BLVD M 097474• \E 3234Y PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND-' - TREE REPLACEMENT ✓ 101.0. mass nrr_. r A1r.4rwi . AlrllM. wi , tl'Yt■kareewM-r. Ir I1�YlAW mereeu iwY MY LY'1eW/wM.l, M YIIMIIYY,^WY wot•OP ..•iM M Y I■VAIMWn.WW IwallomoMm Ir Y WoOMMI M/WW.. 11•11.81. Cwr. t i..... . IMMM"Wthiow es bylw.i.nso ere.. T...11MY.Iie� Yl IA it a.e,r irr .1 . Tme 'Wed M.- VI eon we. TREE PROTECTION DETAIL ..10711"t.rM..w.,nr.,,(...1 L.w.re it*ia LW= MCMOIM WW1 111M• LT ely,r.Yl„ rut. Mmm UMW* I raroVW 11•4•MILI.I1Mar 11.1rMp-.w,..- WWI r.rLWO.LI. Ww. . comers 1YLe • N'..Y. Nl. I r w. Mow WIC.In.11...1..w -'-5-- 1 lw bi. 0. WALL.1.anOsmo1M s•Mayn.N..lr v. lam PWWW.M.WwwW,Mmade LAea..V..ee.EN MOWN.. MIMS •M•My1.MSrr.c Y.MY- 140.01-4we -M �wM.M�.......wr W.= WWW* MWM rim . -W„•.- M.MVM IMIMMUM. f D'MLUe a M..L'el • l.• Mioaire r L• u. ML ew lelL 1awwnr.-+wwr.y 4..w• WALL Lu AW or,r.r.rr.c e wY Womm 1- rr.M.l (WWWWww *am nay... 5.0.00.* o,OUeeNLitl•.`.rr M•r erinamidorra p4Y`� mma mr MOMM COLOR . -eW1y1e.A Per Mr. re*. .,. M MU. NORTH SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN.. 20'1 1 E N'ENDLD STW ll HIN z c� z< I— ac 0 z c'' N -• z W J X Y 0 Architecture and Planning 1 Leeson Pomeroy Na•theest Royce A. Berg, ALA. 1201- 4th Ave. S., Ste 200 Seattle, WashIngton 98134 (206) 583 -8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN Flle: 95024/HOTLSITE JOB NO.: 1140E4 DATE: 11 -I148 DRAW L4110112 CHP17ti SHEET NO OF: L -1 .t.m i +::.,;44. aD' E � ' ti.iAxxu.w:mT•:.r�:::t L Z Hw !O O )u) p =W =. �J H. 000 J. LL Q D. ZOF • N, W, � 0 • Z: • W W •Z WARNER ENGINEERING 0122 OAmre Dr. Re Sale 8204 Gig Nate, RA 94029 Office (206) 666 -6577 Fm (206) 656 -6579 51ST AVENUE SOUTH N 00.94.34' E 6 00'1290' -V 74.73' RETAINING WALL rD — <x 3a' A LOADING I1 1 00 Adl EXISTIN SEVER LINE ED 1ST ING %. .. '• WATERLINE r' -- E_ -'-� .EASEMENT J 0 O SOUTNCENTER BLVD 0074'34' C 32369- CKAGOCY EXISTING PRIVATE DR! EXISTING BUILDING NOTE: • . ,SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY TRIAD ASSOCIATES SATED SEPTEMBER 09, IXXI FOR EASEMENTS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS SITE. UPDATED PRELIMINARY SURVEY DATA PREPARED RI' BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS JUNE 22. 1895 CONNECT TO EXISTING CITY STORM SYSTEM IN 53RD AVENUE SO. EXISTING BUILDING 90 - UNITS 4 6 - UNITS SERVICE / OFFICE SITE ARCA 87,976 S.F. - 2.01 ACRE PARKING +97 STALLS IMPERVIOUS AREA . 52.424 S.F. REGULAR 63 STALLS 9' % 19' (2FT. OVERHANGE) PERVIOUS AREA i 35,552 S.F.- 400 COMPACT 28 STALLS 8' % 16' H.C. 5 STALLS 13' X 20' NATURAL AREA A. 15.732 S.F. LOADING 1 STALL 10' % 32' UNTOUCHED DU'LDING AREA 1ST FLOOR 205 FLOOR 380 FLOOR TOTAL: 9,724 S.F. 9,724 S.F. 9,724 S.F. 29,172 S F. PRESERVED TREES SCHEMATIC CIVIL PLAN 120' Z I- W. re JV: 0 0 i Np. } W = j J 1-. NO I W g -1 J. IL?; j iZ W WO . . O O TO li IM W 1U I .IL O. Z U ZL: O Z TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. Architecture ono Planning Leos0n Pomeroy Norlh•esl . Royce A. Berg, A.I.A. 1201 - 4th Ave. S., 8102 Seattle, Washington 98134 (206) 583 -8030 . NO DESCRIPTION DATE SCHEMATIC CIVIL PLAN F3cSCHMATIC.DWG ,ran' JOB NO.: 99014 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 14446 DRANK: CA CHECK: Z I- W. re JV: 0 0 i Np. } W = j J 1-. NO I W g -1 J. IL?; j iZ W WO . . O O TO li IM W 1U I .IL O. Z U ZL: O Z .,�,._a............I...,... - ..t.u•1:�.:.u:r:..... Aid::,.: lxo.._,.,.. ��s, .= ':.:'.�.Y:.':s:..L..,.n..,.P. IFS= I SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE —1— SEWER LINE 9 10 0 La AO 0 CATCH BASIN II■ .. . . ` RCELA ' • 'SCIOACW. ' h „nR: \\ . c • ..F o t.a ro I .. ... iq i Y a I SF YFI <� Y`$gi \ `� 9 Y �, I � TUKWILA SHORT §8A �� °g CASTING BALDING' LOT 2 I MRS°ump H UNE OR p[1. s BY PROPORTIONATE LI • ` CM4N 1.1. I, —.-- STORM DAWN LINE ® WATER METER N WATER VALVE O . WATER WNNOLE 0 FIRE HYDRANT 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION • 0 FIRE MRN INDICATOR . O WATER VAULT . —.— WATER UNE' ■ TELEPHONE RISER o—Y STREET LIGHT m LIGHT VAULT o UTILITY POLE 1-- GUY ANCHOR I —,AR— OVERHEAD POWER k TELECOM. I I SIGN I GAS VALVE R GAS LINE I I PLAT NO. 78 -29-SS I PAKO PARxiNG .RCA LOT 9 w rs a.12 4 IrY C Pp H REMENT W.77 7 (e"PVC Our) E5 I \ �� GS METER ]GAIL 1'.!0' MINT COUNTY AR =AL SUW.TT MAN MN COUIRT =Al SURVIT VIIIDCAL DAM ,R • gg ^ g LINE h .. Vj g 4 CASTING RAJAS I K _o I p l Li I u I /I yYS �� -� rENCC 0® II'. 10. 11MWU 70N CM Or. �. \ \ _ ” . 6' CAiRVO[p [WIC. CUPS �.�� E OR UN[s PER 1 no. N0. annum \ y__ \ ` r I TCS AT A FCR i 1 a PLAT N0. ! ����� �e� ASPHAU R p 1,,�� `�� � ��� 0521 'c. , - _ �RI���� s • NO Eiui UD N LWE,t TRAN5IPSSON " AMO RST UCHTN AR TO P R R SWN. POWER k UAS COMPAQ PER ACC. N0. 7ee7.7e k ASSIGNED TO nn OF NAME 'PER KG WE AURIll PARCEL C • ' .. / &&& N W[$ • • 1 N �P / r ?�,II AT / / g /_ 0, ---• SOY _ _ - -' u— ..�lI —�, '1I I \ 0 0 p ` 01 %6!R C•A.1 [r . i S LINE Or TIMWCA 1 •C•R6' (Ci ji 71 ,[ai e (BOnou) • [,Ism G ""D''' SNORT PEAT NO. )e -79 -$s lo' [SAT rOR WGRCSS. tMRESS • UDfm[s RV.66 1 CB RI 0 •E'R •' rILV ! , REC. N0. 7910170915 POR MC orAcnT Or ONO PROPERTIES PER IE.SA : (S•CYP_5) L•es.' le'CU -II) /t+ 10' [$YT YOR RCCTRIO UNpCRGRWND REC. N0. )e017S0e9e 2•f] 6 (S•GUP -[) / OVER TAO NO RID Ob01 TI rRE TI E TRA / OVER MC NORTH l0' Or TMC CMIRC TR.ICT R qJ / TO iM[ CRY Or SGiRC PER REC. NO 7e01]10e10 ������� GARDEN �f ',CTS IE•el0 (ecoo -W.) ,E.(oe (e•cMR -N ) ,C.617 (fCmo -N) T6 HEBRANK STEADMAN • &: L SSOCIATES, P.'S.' " �:. 'ASSOCIATES, . S. • PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ., 402 COMM 11U124111. MO T7011D AVUIO. ILATT1E, r$IwQTOS 54704 11541441.11$ A.LT.A. /A.C.S.M. LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR ESA DEVELOPMENT, INC. ' CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON Asn '1 .. .. '" • iuD ayR+HS 0/71079 INDEX 61n10(9AtE tAAEfR fAACIS TRACTS 9G AT. '"" "` An /A.W A. 4G7� TW.771l. NC A E. WY [w EDAM EDAM RA9FG 9K PATE: JANUIRY 1996 DRAIN OR a MAP CHECK: a FINAL CHECK: AS 96007 SHEET 6 OF.6 1:12 AL .,�,._a............I...,... - ..t.u•1:�.:.u:r:..... Aid::,.: lxo.._,.,.. ��s, .= ':.:'.�.Y:.':s:..L..,.n..,.P. 13' -1 3/4' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 221 : -2 7/8' 13' -0' 13' -0 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 6'66 : -6' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -0' 13' -1 3/4 —I 0 FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN 2nd & 3rd FLOOR SIMILAR NORTH BUILDING FLOOR PLAN ® FIRST FLOOR h1 /8't 1 95 uj 2 Di U 0. N; :0 F-. W LL- I• • Z N': H FL; Z TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. .r ArcR ectum and Planning Rqp A. Borg A.I.A. PMe6101 Y. Ken K. CtiIn. Wools( 1201 - 4th MR. S. 1102 &HMS. WMhMpin 06134 (206) 563 -6630 NO DESCRIPTION . DATE ENTRY STAIRS 01 -31 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 01 -31 -06 BLDG. FLR. PLAN File 95024 \H1RR s/e' JOB NO.: 66666 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 14161111 f� DRAWN: , le A-2 CHECK: uj 2 Di U 0. N; :0 F-. W LL- I• • Z N': H FL; Z 51ST AVENUE SOUTH EXISTING F.H. L VATER X h b • a•4611r V 7477 L7r. ..... M 00/5474/ E NCO' / ROCKERY 4' 6AX.-`C / II — — , - ELECTRICAL L EOwKm!CATION I(_ ,L _E.EEN6ML /_ RETAINING MALT — — "- — 7 1 ICK 6 O� /5, % oT LOADING 1 ■ \0 N CREEK LINE XISTING ROCKERY' DETENTION•, POND EXISTING \.. WATERLINE \ EASEMENT '-;;EXISTING B' . SEVER LINE J LIGHT IRIHG_VALL VERIFY EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVE I • I ROCKERY 41 MAX, N 0074•14 STORM DRAINAGE SEE CIVIL EXISTING BUILDING NOTES: 1. PARKING LOT UGNTNG STANDARDS UNITED TO 20' IN HIGHT 2. SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY TRIAD ASSOCIATES DATED SEPTEMBER 09, 1991 FOR EASEMENTS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS SITE. UPDATED PREUMINARY SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS JUNE 22, 1995 'r 90 - UNITS + 6 - UNITS SERVICE / OFFICE SITE AREA 87.976 S.F. - 2.01 ACRE PARKING +97 STALLS IMPERVIOUS AREA t 52,424 S.F. REGULAR 63 STALLS 9' X 19' (2FT. OVERHANGE) PERVIOUS AREA f, 30,552 S.F.- 40% COMPACT 26 STALLS B' X 3' H.C. 5 STALLS 13' X 20' NATURAL AREA f 15.732 S.F. LOADING 1 STALL 10' X 32' UNTOUCHED BUILDING AREA 15T FLOOR 9,724 S.F. 2ND FLOOR 9,724 S.F. 3R13 FLOOR 9,724 S.F. TOTAL: 29,172 S.F. SITE PLAN PRESERVED TREES 0 0 SOUTHCENT NORTH 120'11. Z -W 6 JU 00. WW: W I�} g d Z I-'. LL1 _'. D Q, j;0 W W: V V / I_ O TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. Archltactun and Planning Royce A Berg, ALA Principal Y. Kan K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 4th Ave. S. F02 Swathe. Washington 96134 (206) 563 -8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE GRADING REV. 12 -15 -95 RAMP & STAIRS 01 -19 -96 BIOSWALE & STORM 01 -25 -96 ENTRY STAIRS 01 -29 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 01 -31 -96 SITE PLAN Far. 95024 \NOTLSITE I/4' JOB NO.: 91014 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 114141 A DRAWN: BID A-1 CHECK: Z -W 6 JU 00. WW: W I�} g d Z I-'. LL1 _'. D Q, j;0 W W: V V / I_ O SAT AVEWE SOUTH Li PYLON SIGN ESA - 10051 -PS r I 11 VO EXISTING IILDING IONUENT SIGN - ESA- I6SL-NS /OF LIGHT MIIIIIIILIIIIIIF EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING CURB CUT SS11D AVENUE SOUTH — - — EXISTING VALK • • • • /1 NORTH SITE LIGHTING PLAN 1401 1 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. A i 1 _ & i iiiikArahltecture and Planning Rota A Sam ALA. PAnc4d Y. OUR K. Gut. PAxbd 1201 - 4th Ara. 5. /102 5a0004. 5.11019146 90134 (200) 507 -0030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE BAR. REM9p1S 02 -14 -96 SITE LIGHTING PLAN FXr. 95024 \HUGHT I/1 JOB NO.: NON SHEET NO OF: DATE: 11.1940 DRAW OD OD CHECK: '2 WARRIOR Floodlight fe FAW Applications Warrior offers a variety of lamp and mounting options in both HPS and metal halide. These combine with watertight construction and adjustable light cutoff to make Warrior perfect for marinas, storage /service areas, parking lots and light industrial areas. 250 -40) WATT HPS . Dimensions 1s —• 1Y • -1s •—• Ordering Information Catalog Number Logic Lamp Product Mounting Lamp Type Family Distribution Type Wattage /Base Voltage HP =HPS WR= Warrior 65 =6X5 S= Slipfitter 250 =250W /Mogul 120 =120 Volt MH =Met. Hal. T= Trunnion 400 =400W /Mogul 208 =208 Volt 250/400= 250 /400W /Mogul 240=240 Volt (wired 250W) 277 =277 Volt 480=480 Volt MT =Multi -Tap Catalog's Lamp' Lamp Ballast Number Type Wattage Type EPA Net. Wt. Shipping • (Lbs.) Volume HPWR -65S -250 HPS 250 HPF 1.3 35 1 /ctn. HPWR.85S- 250/400 HPS 250/400 HPF 1.3 35 2.0 cu.ft. HPWR -65S -400 HPS 400 HPF 1.3 35 MHWR -65S -250 MH 250 HPF 1.3 35 MHWR -65S -400: MH 400 HPF 1.3 35 1 Add desired voltage to end of catalog number -120, 208, 240, 277 or 480 Volt. Multi•Tap ballasts are 120/208/240/277 Volt. 2 Standard lamp is mogul base, Not included. 3 To order trunnion mount replace `S` with `T- in catalog number. LUMARK FEB 5 1996 Z � 6 Wi C.) O' CO N W N LL W O! g J. LL Q co —d`. 1 LLi Z Z�. • uj U ;G I—; W H W U; Ur •Z u; Z TYPE; DESCRIPTION The Fail -Safe VR 2000 Decorative Series combines strength- gaining architecture with energy - saving technology. Architecturally angled facets with radius camera actually Increase the ability of the lens to deflect blows end absorb impact. Extra thick injection molded polycarbonete lens incorporates an optical design that obscures the lamp image and spreads light evenly. U.L. listed and C.S.A. certified for wet locations. APPLICATION The durable, versatile Decorative DC•VE/DW -VE is perfect for use in corridors, dormitories, public rest rooms, rapid transit stations, loading docks and minimum security institutions. 0 H C CATALOG SPECIFICATION FEATURES A —Lens One piece injection molded UV stabilized polycarbonete, min, 0.130' thick. All light control prisms & blonde's are on the inside surface of the lone, reducing dirt build -up and making cleaning easier. B•••Festeners Two stainless steel TORX• screws with center reject pin. Screw heads are recessed into ions to maximize tamper - resistance. Fasteners are captive in the lens and sealed by means of a neoprene O•ring. C•• ;Mounting 16 ga. CRS mounting plate with white high reflectance polyester powder coat finish, Type "w-A " D•••SCD Housing (Optional Accessory) Four 1/4' dia, fasteners are required for maximum vandal resistance. Cast aluminum with four 1/2' NPT conduit entries. E• •Lamp (By Others) F•- •socket Polycerbonate: Dedicated to correct lamp Wattage. Incandescent is porcelain medium base with nickel - plated brass screw shell. G.-Gasket One piece the-cut closed cell EPDM mounting gasket seals entire lens and housing. H'.'Bailest (Fluorescent Only) Copper-wound NPF ballast standard. HPF magnetic or electronic ballasts are available with some lamps. 12 /16" 1332mm1 P A a SIDE DIMENSIONS •31/2 169mm • 31/2" depth is ADA sesselsble for m rn.th g 148mm1 Nes than SD• above grads. COOPER LIGHTING SCD casting I i— 31,2" t89mm1 17 /e' MOUNTING DIMENSIONS e 9/16" roummli 3 7/4" 183mml (4(9/32' 17mmi Mounting Hoist 8 3 /3" 12a8nnm1 13 /15' 1332mm1 Tax• is a roplators.y traowerk o! Camenr ,;v A ;rub r,t T. a,nn Inr ttom FAIL. -SAFE' DC -VE DW -VE DECORATIVE 7 W— 2 8 W Fluorescent 6 0 W Incandescent ssrrrmot POLYCARBONATE DECORATIVE LUMINAIRE Clear Prismatic or White with Vertical Eyelid Vandal Resistant Luminaire t `�t 7 (1 y i °:311114 FEB 5 19% Avf:idi:rs & Planers. ENERGY DATA Fur Energy Menogentent related tachntcet data to support the performance of fixture sgrlee, for refer to the ordering this information input wattage. ; BANDIT • Low Wattage Security Ordering Information Catalog Number Logic Lamp 7Yp• Mounting X HP3HPS B =Knuckle MH =Met. Hal. TaTrunnion Product Family F =BOndit Applications The rugged Bandit provides a money - saving alternative to traditional incandescent and quart: lighting units. A durable'' die -cast aluminum housing and sealed optics make Bandit perfect for landscape, sign, facade and security lighting. Lena GL.Glass 35.17$ WATT '^ PS /MH Dimensions Mal rtknlrr! Lamp Wattage /Ouse 35 =35W /Medium 50a50W/Medium 70 =70W /Medium 100 =100W /Medium 150 =150W /Medium 175 =175W /Medium Power Raotor H =HPF =NW' Note: For illustrations of o;ticns And accessories, sae page 115. For more Information, see tho lunark Technical and ADpiication» Guide. Catalog' Number Lamp, wattage HPBF- G1.•35.120V11.' HPBF•G1.•50.120V•LL HPBF- GL-70.120V -LL HP8F•G1.100.120V.11 HPBF•GL- 150.120V.11 MHBF•GL40H•DT•MEO•LL MHBF•GL•100H•MT•MED•1L MHBF- G1.•175H•MT MED -LL 35 50 70 100 150 70 100 175 ' Ballasts for 120 Volt units are Normal Rower Factor Reactor tv. . Multi -Tap t ' St ndard HID lamp is medium base. Lamp is included. 25 watt HPS is 120V only. Options (add as sunlit) PEnFactoryinstallod internal photocontrol F1 =Single fuse (120 or 277) F2 =Double Fuse (208. 2d0 or 460) TR =Tamper•resistant screws NKSR2 /3" 0,D. slipfitter fur knuckle mount WHT =White finish GRYaGray finish 11/=One top visor 2V =Two horizontal visors 2SV =Two side visors 3V =Three visors (top and two sides) 4V.Four visors Lamp ryP• HPS HPS FIPS HPS HPS MH MH MH Net. Wt. (Lbs.) Voltage 120 =120 Volt 208400 Volt 206 =208 Volt 240 =240 Volt 277 =277 Volt 347 =347 Volt 480 =480 Volt OT =DuaI•Tap MT =Multi Tap TT= Triple =fap Options LL =lamp Included MEO -LL =Mod. Base Met Hal. Lamp Included Shipping Volume 8 8 q 9 10 16 10 15 1 /ctn. 0.55 cu. ft nests ere 120/2081240/277 Volt, Dual•Te.p Ballasts are 120/277 Volt, and Triple-Tap ballasts toe 120/2771347 You Accessories (order separately) PE /MT =Field installod photocontrol, 120 /208/240/277V PE•490=480V photocontrol RBC =Round outlet box cover TRSD•8 /32 =Tamper - resistant screwdriver FEB 5 i99 P;!!.,tit. i 1:.r : i v J F i Z r4 W; UO' u)0„ WW` W 0• .... ° W F• _ Z I— O Z LU U• CI O NI 0 H;. S0i- —: O; • W Z: O f-, CO Z TYPE: DESCRIPTION The Fail-Safe VS 2000 9" Square Series combines strength- gaining architecture with energy - saving technology, Architecturally angled facets with radius corners actually increase the ability of the lens to deflect blows and absorb impact. Extra thick injection molded polycarbonate lens incorporates optical design that obscures the lamp image and spreads light evenly. U.L. listed and C.S.A. certified for wet locations. APPLICATION The durable, versatile 9" Square EC /EW is perfect for use to corridors, dormitories, public rest rooms, rapid transit stations, loading docks and minimum security institutions, CATALOGS,: SPECIFIC. .0N FEATURES 7YPt "5A„ A•'.Lens One piece injection molded UV stabilized polycarbonate, min. 0.130" thick. All light control prisms & blondeis are on the inside surface of the lens, reducing dirt build -up and making cleaning easier. 8— Fasteners Four stainless steel TORX' screws with center reject pin. Screw heads are recessed into lens to maximize tamper - resistance. Fasteners are captive in the lens and sealed by means of a neoprene 0 -ring. C•..Reflector 16 ga. CRS with white high reflectance polyester powder coat finish. D».'SCE Housing (Optional Accessory) Cast aluminum. Four 1/4' dia. fasteners are required for maximum vandal resistance. Four 1/2" NPT entries for surface conduit. Standard black polyester powder coat finish. E•..Lan1p (By Others) F—Socket Polycarbonatel Dedicated to correct lamp wattage, Incandescent is porcelain medium base with nickel - plated brass screw shell, G...Gesket One piece die- cut'ciosed cell EPOM mounting gaskets seal entire lens and housing. H...Sallest (Fluorescent Only) Copper - wound NPF ballast standard. HPF magnetic or electronic ballasts are available with some lamps, Consult ordering information. SiDE DIMENSIONS SCE Casting I 7/5' (4ammi COOPER LIGHTING MOUNTING DIMENSIONS i0 8 5/8• Sq. (219mm) (4) 9/32' D(0. j7mm) 7 3/2• Sq. Mounting oles (197mml • FAIL -SAFE' EC 9" SQUARE EW 9" SQUARE 7 W— 2 8 W Flucrescent. 7 5 W Incandescent POLYCARBONATE 9" SQUARE LUMINAIRE Clear Prismatic or White Perimeter Paint Available Vandal Resistant Luminaire ENERGY DATA For Energy Menagen1611t r"leted technical data to )1.1pport the performance of this fixture acrid', rotor to the ordering information for input *mine. 51:1) r • FEB 5 '996 LPI 'rchitt is <: [ atlf 3rs 1 C'Rx• is a repnteted trademark of C "mear DivilionlITextron Inc. ADC940935 ii: k�^. t��ad! �b' dtM: titu .t/S:ltY�iF.�rulifaYY`&:i�� � 1 • Z LU CC Li] • D 0 • a (OW W _J w 0 • >- ‹ IX < - • 0 Z F.- HO Z F- LU w D O (22 • H W j • - tl_ I- - Z W R- Z PHOTOMETRICS & REFLECTOR S 1 u\1RIR( 11(1\ Itim• l \ifn.(', .h,ntr' -1!,) .1v .14.ilrlf Itln•II III I4,nulII' I% Of. l \y/1,r', • -f nn tt,rf( 11rr.r� I LILr,'I Itln, II'rlunt,rr(l Ih,nnt I %,,mrr, r 1)'.lydurhrrn 41)1/tt'it11,1olIi.r ;i!•• lt1n- Ill l L,frlh l,n, ul . 15Jlr 11.1fl \I, •I,+; f I,+IJr LUMINAIRE EPA CHART (ANSI Standards) Medium D90 D180 T90 TN120 Q90 DIMENSIONS GBM— Medium Arm -Mount 21 -5/8" 15 -5/8" - Mount -6" Bracket (GBM) — 3.30 — 6.61 — — — IArm Br Bracket (GBM) Bracket (GBM) — 3.48 6.95 6.95 10.43 10.41 13.91 PoleTop (GBPM) 3.52 — — — — — — Large GBPM— Medium Pole -top 21 -5/8" 15.5/8" 21- 15/16" 26 -1/8" 19.1/2" Arm - Mount -6" Bracket (GBL) Arm - Mount -14" Bracket (GBL) 26 -1/8" 19-1/2" 26- 13/16" - 5.19 10.39 10.39 15.58 15.45 20.78 Pole -Top (GBPL) 479 ••( 111 I, ,irrn r..I,s'I(i, +1(1 1_' Jl•'l nlrtrnndl ••\( ill 1, .urn ..61nr1'1i ;J ,rnl • /l' HOW TO ORDER LUMINAIRES Luminaire Prefix Distribution Lamp Wattage Light Sourcet Line Voltage Luminaire Finish Options Medium Arm -Mount GBM Pole Top GBPM 2 — Type II 3 —Type Ill FP— Perimeter Forward Throw 5 — Type V Square 150 175 250 400 HPS SMV MH — High Pressure Sodium 150, 250, 400 Watt — Super Metal Halide (Vertical) 400 Watt — Metal Halide 175, 250, 400 Watt CT — Contoured Tempered Glass 120V 208V 240V 277V 480V MT — Multi Tap Standard BRZ — Bronze COA — Cocoa VAN — Vanilla BLK — Black PLT — Platinum WHT — White Large Arm -Mount GBL Pole Top GBPL 2 — Type II FP— Perimeter Forward Throw FA — Automotive Forward Throw 5 — Type V Square 400 HPS — High Pressure Sodium 750 400, 750, 1000 Watt 1000 SMV — Super Metal Halide (Vertical) 400, 1000 Watt MH — Metal Halide 400, 1000 Watt Architectural (Optional) BRD — Brick GYG — Gray Granite RDG — Red Granite LMS — Limestone DTS — Desertstone MGR — Green Marble GRN — Green PCR *— •Photoelectric Control 120, 208, 240, 277V LL — Less Lamp CL — Coated Lamp FS — Fusing for 120V and 277V (except for 1000W in 120V) FS1 — Fusing for 120V/1000\V FD — Double Fusing for 208V and 240V FD1 — Double Fusing for 480V HSS — House Side Shield RPA — Round Pole Adaptor NO — No Options Color Decals 45 — Light Gold 20 — Charcoal Metallic 55 — Black 94 — Blue Metallic 01 — Chrome 59 — Dark Green 51 — Dark Red 21 — Tomato Red 309 — Putty 50 — White Arm Options** 12BK— 12" Bolt -On Arm 14BK— 14" Bolt -On Arm EXAMPLE OF A TYPI( AL ORDER GBM -5- 400- MH -CT- 120 - BRZ -NO NOTE: "ii, fi,l,on •o It•,a.r,11,i, 1(n' a 1, 1,It 'nr. l.n l),•u., Vlnu. ,q .I BRACKETS Arm -Mount (Bolt -On Bra( ket)or Pole -lop (Mounting Huh) iti in( luded y +hen ordering luminaires. lighting systems •l,n' ING S0S1(r.1S A D v ,On of I Si In,]v,.•• , 100(8) All IAN( I RD. • PO BOX 42728 • CINCINNATI, OH 45242 -0728 • (513i 79 3. 3200 • (AX (',1 31 79 3 (1147 Z �W JU 00 co CI W = H. LL WO g (n =. S O 1- W Z= I- O Z I— W • W U� O — a I— W LU H .. Z W —• I O ~ Z Tukwila, WA -- COMING SOON Sign ESA -191 SL -WS ESA-1 91 S L -WS r. Entry Awnings — nhaid -a — - Pylon ESA- 100SL -PS =MIN sears ESA -I 6SL -MS /OF —♦ 1 631d Avenue ss- rs.�N.s- uwsisai -_ = s i s Warr. oir�r�u arm rVMSr s WOO I asp W 88111 s�rr ssrs emisa�s e= L w Aiiu SIB NIA 117.1111 U. 20 AIR Site Plan i .- rwaw10 ION Scale: 1/64" = 1' - 0" North Lff$-0W3 E.VTENDED STA1 k44ERit 1 4 Delilah Number: 24-96 ~ W U: U) 0: MI 1 (— II- cc Qi CY w z Z ~'. Sheet: 1of11 poi -0� File Name: t;.0 t—' wW tukwilal.cdr f: _ Salesperson: u., z R. Doughty r,'w rn .U= Deal crier: 0 Virdell ; z. Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208 - 223.1122 800.562.2854 USA 206.223 -1123 FAX This original artwork Is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. • Tukwila, WA General Contractor to build special domer roof section to hold ESA -191 SL -WS. w MR MO 11104 • ff1141111.10 MAN PAM MS ri 1171—E-171 1111 11111 III 0 14i ::n WM NM West Elevation: Single Face Wall Sign (ESA -191 SL -WS) Scale: 1/32' = 1' - 0" TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES General Contractor to build special domer roof section to hold ESA 191 SL -WS. Entry Awnings (ESA - BLDG -OA) and (ESA - BLDG -GA). � •t ! ; �u ; , ► EIEi . -.- .--- Fr1 -- ... r- Iri 71 AIL AIL. T 111PNWE I NV% WTI NW 91 NW MAIN ENTRY East Elevation: Single Face Wall Sign (ESA -191 SL -WS) and Entry Awnings Scale: 1/32' = 1' - 0" E.xTiNDnD STM .MERft ESA -191 SL-WS Entry Awnings Tukwila, WA UOL (0 III; . .N„-. 2 :7.1.0: Desi n Number: 3496 . ° Shest: ; 2of11 ev�i O N File Name: ?� tukwila2.cdr w wi Salesperson: O rleu�nhiv ' Zti' Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -19 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208.223.1122 800582 -2854 USA 208-223-1123 FAX This original artwork Is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. 9` -10" 44' RIDGE a ENTRY GABLE Tukwila, WA General Contractor to build special domer roof sections to hold ESA- 144SL -WS. 'r a 40' RIDGE t? MAIN BL DG 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I I I ■ 7- 10'i 3" South Elevation: Single Face Wall Sign (ESA- 100STK WS) Scale:1 /16" = 1' - 0" GNU i South Elevation: ESA- 100STK WS Scale: 1/32" = 1' - O' W .I' . 01117 Fa[ s 1 M@1w11411 to 1 1 • NT flat lai: North Elevation: No Signage Scale: 1/32" = 1' - 0" L?5 eV(.2 • EVIINDiD Salesperson: R. Doughty Desi er: T. VIrdell Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -19 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 88134 206-223-1122 800682.2854 USA 206- 223 -1123 FAX This original artwork Is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. 21' -10' 1W 6' r 151/2 XTENDED STAY AMERICA E F F I C I E N C I E S Pipe size and footing dimensions to be engineered for this site according to local code and requirements. Pipe and footing to be provided by TubeArt. Tukwila, WA i 12' centers Internally - Illuminated 100 sq. ft. double faced pylon sign. "Install 8 months before building begins. Scale: 1/8" • 1' - 0" ► Upper decorative area of pylon to be constructed from sheet metal and angle Iron construction. Paint background PMS 342C Green. Paint borders, trim, and decorative cladding PMS 488C Tan. Hail circle area of sign to be open. ► Top double face cabinet to be constructed from TubeArt aluminum extrusion 4049 (91/2) body and 418 (2 1/4" x 3') retainers. Paint cabinet PMS 342C Green. Paint Interior of cabinet white. ► Pylon faces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. One face to hinge open for access to lamps and ballasts. ► Bottom double face cabinet to be constructed from 11ibeArt aluminum extrusion 419 (91/2') body and WI (21/4" x 3") retainers. Paint cabinet PMS 342C Green. Paint Interior of cabinet white. One face of cabinet to hinge open for access to lamps and ballasts. ► Bottom cabinet faces to be 3/18" white lexan with 1st surface SIGNTECH 4048 Dark Green background. Copy area opening of sign to show -thru white with 3M 3630-22 Matte Black vinyl copy. Price numerals are to be black vinyl on clear plastic changeable panels. Clear tracks are to hold panels In place. Copy to read 'COMING SOON' when pylon Is placed at site. 'COMING SOON' copy to be 3M 3830.53 Cardinal Red vinyl, background to be 3M 3630.149 U. Beige vinyl applied to 1st surface 013/18' white lexan. When building Is complete and cabinet signage Is added to building, the price signage should be Installed and 'COMING SOON' removed. No Illuminate cabinets with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12 centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballasts or equal (minumum starting temperatures -20° F). • Support pipe sizes T.B.D. Paint pipes and cladding PMS 480C Tan. TubeArt to pour pipe footing. Footing dimensions and concrete yardage needed are T.B.D. • (2) 20amp 120v circuit required. L,q5 -o0(R3 EA -TENDED STAY 4444 -RICA Design Number: 24-96 Ui C.) 01 co a., co Ur 'wo. LILL 4S.. = C7; . • .F.. W Z 4.5 + Z'{ . :v Ni O t Salesperson: R. Doughty Designer: T. Irdeii Date: 01 -17 - 96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 02 -14 -96 laibeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208. 223 -1122 800 - 562.2854 USA 206 - 223.1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. E � ^inn STA1 ME RIl i Tukwila, WA EMENDED STAY AMERICA] F t F I( 11 N € ! L S iT=i7=alir= ii= ••_11- 11_11r_ - 11=11 =1 iii ;;: IrdsfnsHy4IIunilnst�d 10 sq. ft. double faced monument sign. Sale: 3/a' • 1' - o' • ►.Cabinet and pole cover to be constructed from steel angle iron frame wilh .063 aluminum filler returns and retainers. Paint IIIIsr and returns • Sarin While. Paint Interior of cabinet white. Paint pole cover to match 84& TECH 4000 Ten (PM$ 460C Tin). • Faces to be 3(16' fiat dear Lexen with second surface translucent vinyl graphic& Border strips and all Dopy to be 3M 3630.149 Lt. Beige Translucent vinyl. Background logo to be 3M 3 630.76 Holly Green Translucent vinyl. Rule lines within green background to be 3M 363063 Cardinal Red Translucent vinyl. Back all graphics wflh 3M 3635.70 White Diffuser film. • Copy on (2) sides of pole cover to be 3M 3030-22 Matte Black vinyl graphics on face of pole cover to identify .'OFFICE', phone number, and arrow Exact numbers to be determined per location. • illuminate cabinets with 600 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 10' canters powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -200 F). • ► Pipe thru sign and pole cover to be standard 2'steel pipe (.154 wall). • Pipe footing dimension to be 2 - 6' width, 2 - 6' length, and 2 •31/2' deep. .55 Yards of concrete required. • (1) 20amp 120v circul required. r 1o' �— Lamps on 4 Electrical Conduit Aeons panel V centers. 1---- Footing dimension engineered for this site are 7 - e• length, width, and 21- 31/2' deep. Pipe and tooling provided by TtabsArt. Conceal on/o- switch within sign. Pipe cover L9,5-0041 ESA- I6SL -MS /OF Tukwila, WA Salesperson: R. Doug* Designer: V(rdetl Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 llibeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208. 223.1122 8004582.2854 USA 208- 223 -1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. • • . „ . • " COWL. LL E 2 u. 'Dr %Lk 11— • WLUL . „ ‘1H: L• u,r; 10.-1 • • .• • f: .• I- - . *- • ' • t•.: -L! . zi‘ • .r: Tukwila, WA OPTION A • , FO.;07P:arOVAMY-WiftMisZO-TiiiiM74filiiftaiii%6•17 -r VENDED STAY AMERICA VF }CIF NCIES -riS•t>.t-IN14.i.ti'm:41;cii•I'llt•'''''' 741" Pi% .8(4 02 1•4 OPTION B 41x41x111 Pools 4-01 behooved*. 1, - 01 sr 4" dews& support bracing. 70' eiriEUMMI=INEMIMIONRIMOV, 8' - 0" x 18' - 0' (128 Option A) or (258 Option B) sq. ft single face construction signs. Scale: 3/161 us 1' - 0' P. Sign to be Installed 7 months prior to opening. • Sign to be removed at time of opening. Background(s) to be four (4)4' - 0" x V - 0' x 112" MOO pieces of plywood (good both sides). Paint background o• to match SIGNTECH 4880 Thn (PMS 486C Tim). Support posts to be exes 10 - 0' painted to match P. background. See mounting details for proper support. Graphics to be 3M Opaque Vinyl. Colors to match closest to COLOR SPECIFiCATTONS. Logo background and 'A Business EMcelncy Hotel" to be 220.58 Out Green vinyl. 'EXTENDED STAY AMERICA', border stripe, and "EFFICEINCIEr to show thru Tan. Logo stripes to be 220.53 Cardinal Red vinyl. 'COMING SOON' copy to be 220.53 Cardinal Red vinyl. L °IS CCCD3 1.\TiNnii) ST "COMING SOON Sirs Tukwila, WA Deslis, Number: Sheet: 4-95 11 of 11 File Name: tukwila3.cdr Salesperson: R. Doughty Desitner: T. Virden Date: 01 -29-96 01 -30-96 "IbbeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208-223-1122 800.662-2854 USA 208-223-1123 FAX ,• • This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. Tukwila, WA POLE SIGN SPECIFICATIONS EXTENDED STAY AMERICA Section • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle Iron frame with .083 aluminum flier and retainers. Paint filler and returns PMS 342C Green. Paint Interior of cabinet white. ► Pylon faces to be flexible substrate with SIONTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS for logo colors. ► Illuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" antes powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -200 F). ► Sign to be manufactured to U.L specifications. _.J CHANCIFABLEPRELSolka • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle Iron frame with .083 aluminum Mier and retainers. Paint filler and returns PMS 3420 Green. Paint Interior of cabinet white. ► Faces to be 3/W white Isoun with 3M 3830.22 Matte Black vinyl copy. Prloe numerals are to be black vinyl on clear plastics changeable panel. Clear tracks are to hold panel In place. ► 18uminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° F). ■ Sign to be manufactured to U.L specUcations. SUPPORT STRUCTURE • Standard single pole steel structure primed and painted to match SIONTECH 4880 Tian. Higher elevation signs to staged in multiple sections. Structures to be designed la accordance with local oodee and conditions. 7a COLOR SPECIFICATIONS ► "EXTENDED STAY AMERICA", "EFFICIENCIES", and Inset border around sign background to be SIONTECH 4880 TMs. ► Rule Lines above and below "EFFICIENCIES' to be SIONTECH 1030 Dark Red. ► Background color and outside border at perimeter of face to be SIONTECH 4048 Dark Green. ► Retainers and fillers for high pylon signs are to be painted to match SIONTECH 4048 Dark Green (PMS 342C Green). • Retainers and fillers for monument signs to be painted white. ► Retainers and fillers for building and well signs to be painted to match SIONTECH 4048 Dark Green (PMS 342C Green). ■ Steel pipe supports on pylon signs and base covers of monument signs are to be primed and painted to match SIONTECH 4880 Mtn (PMS 488C Tin). Color Specifications Various Signage Design Number: 4-95 Sheet: 7 of 11 Salesperson: R. Doughty Date: 01 -17.96 01 -25 -96 libbeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 08134 208 - 223.1122 800582.2854 USA 208. 223 -1123 FAX ■ This original �',• , `• ark is protected 41. et. Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. Tukwila, WA 7' - " 21 -0" 7 it. t A - Electrical penetration. on 12" centers. Angie iron support on 4' - 0" centers. Mounting to be thru supports. 4............. Internally- illuminated 191 sq. ft. single faced wall sign. Scale: 1/4n = 1' - 0" ■ Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler returns and retainers. Paint filler and returns PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. ■ Faces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. ■ Illuminate cabinet with 800 ma. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° F). ■ (1) 20amp 120v circuit required. ■ Mount sign to special domer section to be built by G.C. EXTENDED STM' ,AMERI C\ f 4 i e 4 i t S r- 15" ESA- 191SL -WS 'Tukwila, WA Dealgn Number: 4-96 Sheet: 4 of 11 File Name: tukwila3.cdr Salesperson: R. Doughty z HZ � W' oo N0: ww; J ?s uj J; u- ?; W. tilH O z .I-'. v 0 m —; W ui` H U U. ~O. IJJ C.) co 0 z Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -19 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 llibeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 206-223 -1122 800682 -2854 USA . 206-223-1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. F.�Tf fife �T 1 k ifRif4 Tukwila, WA 15 "1 1 10' -3 9' -10" SPECIFICATIONS: Internally- illuminated 100 sq. ft. single faced wall sign. Scale: 1 /4" = 1' - 0" • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler retums and retainers. Paint filler and retums PMS 342C Green. Paint Interior of cabinet white. ■ Faces to be flexible substrate with StGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. ■ Illuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° F). ■ (1) 20amp 120v circuit required. ► Mount cabinet to flat area of wall to be built by G.C. t • Lamping diagram on 12" centers. Electrical penetration. Angle iron support on 4' - 0" centers. Mounting to be thru supports. L95.�1.3 ESA- 100STK WS 'Cukwila, WA Deal ner: T. Virdell Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 llibeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208- 223 -1122 800-582-2854 USA 208.223 -1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. 61ST AVENUE SOUTH IB' OAK EXISTING E.H. L WATER RETAINCU'- •••••.._• -.-•• M'Y7Y V- ..71.7Y�17Y_ — J _ T 1_ MAX." RETAINING WA ROCKI IT 4' ELECTRICAL L COMMUNICATION N EASEMENT b. 15. r 7LIA 'MI ....2 I .I d I '',I nr I I I I I- I I• I I 4. I I I ,_ „; I I I I C I l+ I ''•.I I '.; I I I...._ • I... r. I s,l� I. I :,,...I I- I I I r- PYLON SIGN - ESA- 100SL -PG • TREES TO BE REMOVED SEE • LANDSCAPE PLAN - L. 92Y I I -- I. CC `EXISTING B' ( •y SEVER LINE (VERIFY) • q/. EXISTING ROCKERY LOCUST O RETAINED ., . " ... N 007}•34' C 104.84' EXIST. B' WATER LINE - VERIFY TO BE RELOCAT B SATFI ITE • DISH - "- ADDRET5S NOS. 8 • LL EXISTING • WATERLINE • F�ASEMENT E 'EXIST INS B' SEVER LINE VERIFY EXISTING BUILDING PROP SED NEW SIDEWALK LOCATION I LIGHTING RETAINING WALL f Y ROCKERY 4' MA%. T , STORM DRAINAGE , SEE CIVIL EXISTING BUILDING "DETENTION POND • . B10SWALE. • 0 EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVE NOTES: 1. PARKING LOT LIGHTING STANDARDS LIMITED TO 20' IN MIGHT 2. SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY TRIAD ASSOCIATES DATED SEPTEMBER 09, 1991 FOR EASEMENTS AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS SITE. UPDATED PRELIMINARY SURVEY DATA PREPARED BY BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS JUNE 22, 1995 0 r'Cr 12 PARKING STALLS EASMENT ( FOR E.SA RCEL ) \` 5R� u`A tot 0044, tt J 96 - STALLS (+ 6 STALLS SERVICE / OFFICE) SITE AREA 87,976 S.F. - 2.01 ACRE O 1 PER. UNIT -1,980 S.F. 0 2.5 / 1,000 PARKING +102 STALLS - MATH 12 STALL EASMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA j 52,424 S.F. - 60K REGULAR 72 STALLS 9' X 19' (2FT. OVERHANG) PERVIOUS AREA ±, 35,552 S.F.- 40% COMPACT 24 STALLS B' X 16' NATURAL AREA f 15,732 S.F. H.C. 5 STALLS 13' X 20' UNTOUCHED LOADING 1 STALL 10' X 32' BUILDING AREA 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 305 FLOOR TOTAL: 9,724 S.F. 9,724 S.F. 9,724 S.F. . 29,172 S.F. MAINS ENTRY PIER 13/81 2 PRESERVED TREES NORTH SITE PLAN 120'1 1 ATTACHMENT W .�.iul'r ., ...,t -:n:c ,•ut.1 ,�I- 4�A, •0hcl L,< F: ns.:;# aTn,u:: bw ,tax.2.t6-,..66u.vrlaLcr- I,L•r' • A:aGFalcap' aoDlytavi Nis ka`AWA/4GG ,'GAG'ul.�'. IAN' .Y:;t'A'' IS ,-y; •t nN:l. ie ^t:7k•'6v%' t5f3.- h4.,Z0i•A. "14 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. lintArchltscture and Planning Rom A Bea. ALA Principal Y. Kea K. Chi, Principal 1201 - 4th Are. S. /102 Seattle. an 98114 (206) 883 -8030 3- 8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE GRADING REV. 12 -15 -95 RAMP & STAIRS 01 -19 -96 BIOSWALE & STORM 01 -25 -r ENTRY STAIRS 01 -29- B.A.R. REVISIONS 01- 31 -8._. BAR-ENTRY DR. REV. 02 -13 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -14 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -24-96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -29 -96 SITE PLAN File: 95024 \H SI TE- 2 1/6. JOB NO.: 95024 SHEET NO OF: A -1 DATE: 1148410 DRANK: OID CHECK: ATTACHMENT W .�.iul'r ., ...,t -:n:c ,•ut.1 ,�I- 4�A, •0hcl L,< F: ns.:;# aTn,u:: bw ,tax.2.t6-,..66u.vrlaLcr- I,L•r' • A:aGFalcap' aoDlytavi Nis ka`AWA/4GG ,'GAG'ul.�'. IAN' .Y:;t'A'' IS ,-y; •t nN:l. ie ^t:7k•'6v%' t5f3.- h4.,Z0i•A. "14 PERMIT CENTER ......,..u,:i.::.t.:as, •,��,:. r.� .; W�:.... �.. t:_.a::: �:. s: 5��. u�: �y: �.. �•.:: dce:.! istimesi;;, i« ��.,... v.} i!`. l; iir. r.. �,: �w^:: a:.... � «ix.41...,.,u..ls,:�t'vni.`a., fug. x.,:+; c: �..:.` .t�t....rt,....._vv,�hy:�:;A; ;�.,•,x :, i! ?4:r ��1';1 .v „k. +. �'.h5. tcr'di. .yy4'F;,s�' . (, r 234'2 7/9' �1• • ( == JCJ 5. �T TO 0 32' LOADING T 00 'I 13' -1 3/4' I = C. I a �t �L 11111111111116 I IF ■■ 13' -0' 13' -0' 13'-0' 13' -0' 13' -0' f 13'-0' DN ON DN DN MEM OM ' DfuIEE 0 1 d 1= 6' -6' 6' -6' 13'0' ¶ 13' -0' 13'0' 13' -0' 13' -0' ob• • FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN 2nd & 3rd FLOOR SIMILAR ■ UP Mal • • aal II 13'-0' 13' -0' 13'0' 13' -0' 13' -0' i ,! NORTH BUILDING FLOOR PLAN @ FIRST FLOOR 11/8' 1 Lyso0(03 ENTEKDED ST d 0 LU W z< 0 y, 0 0 ? co xo to W 'z W J X W 00 Architecture and Planning Royce A Brg, A.I.A. Principal Y. Ken K. Odn. Principal 1201 — 4th Ave. S. 1102 Seattle, Washington 98134 (206) 583 -8030 110 DESCRIPTION DATE ENTRY STAIRS 01 -31 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS B.A.R. REVISIONS B.A.R. REVISIONS 01 -31 -9' 02 -24' 02 -29 BLDG. FLR. PLAN File: 95024 \111FLR -2 Vs. JOB NO.: 99024 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 1.22.99 A n DRAWN: OID A-2 CHECK: ATTACHMENT X pre! r CITY OF •i U .lWILA MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER �t:iS��l far:;:' s` u` tt a�i:::.,. t` i�,' A:< i�'•:.:!:•` � ,"ri..s,°.*r \:r_.it��R�r:.�_,... �"`;4u:�.Ki il:..'Lul �. �-4 :..�+...�,07, .„,��r. 'l,Y„i��i N' —COLORED EKTE4IOR INSULATED FINISH SYS109 COLORED SHINGLES WHITE F4A4E0 VINDOVS rf PRE- FINISHED RAILINGS 1,- PAINTED DOORS WEST ELEVATION TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES • :a nr, Ma IC2=I qv =LI 111 1 mm nn 1110 illnui I1IIIIIN0E0N11010ELIINPi 11111/011 a0000 IIIL0OVEENIEIL' LISS IViai- 111111110 Q1IN111181111llifil IIIElli 111IIIlEN1EM1I1111 22221.22 W n I II EbOLNIE _1100IIIElllL11 NiniulauA1111111 „IIan�11111111111111111110 L.l.l II 9IInIn n ne III INE I NN 00111011iu0fi11t ;iumlii 11111111 1111 1111 111 1 1 III 11111' iI IL' CA �n 11111 1E11 11: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVICiIie fiill 1111111 II! IIIIILIIIIIIIII III 'isiiliGi111111 "�iiiiiiiilll IIIIIIVIIIIIIIVIII1111 ' 1111NIill ca " IIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111 laa oIl 11111111 11111 1111 11111111 1 I'IOUIiliiiI 1liriaii0iael 1111111 111E1111 • es :: 7,7 i i i 1 ::: 22 22 Illll 11n gill rim n =1111nn ..QO••,,.,aAD1W1BIRNn wnuiliiailVVl. AIIIILIII�II 1111 'IIIILIIIIIIIIIIIII'glluji9!!I 111!!ill!1!iI0111111 liiiliiilliiiiliiidlllllll6 vv :aaa : : :: •• .3:'. 1000NI ®b1000 b111ialiu 01II�III I0V1111EMbi1iG111100i11VI :a:: l • • vv :::: 1111111 22 Ea 22 C_• I1 11 m:: NEE11n10M01001111 `6o11E1`unuileO' INENIl1M001I011NIIIIli1001111111011 EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRY 44' RIDGE 2 ENTRY GABLEIBEYOND EXTENDED STAY ONN (3 z W z< 1-a �a z F. rn xo N 3z W J x o 3W Architecture and Planning �o Ib I IN ° ul nn • 1as 1111 u •: Il lioinNiitlmil111l0lIlliBlr11 p• IW I11 8'l1111111111,11' gig l 11111111 [�] e1�1 aW 1111111 eiligiii1r 1111111111111111 I:1111 Inns of nl yei G1 iti � F 1 Oil III Ii' 1 n laall oa l I I SDI aa� rill mm nn mm t NOR SVa11 ANNA l 1i11 111° ER . ii 111= IN II11a ac '1 711 ono 1,mm 11111Il11AA1b111 I otl4t10I //11111111 1 1b5ietV1l a_10 ii00lio l IIIIN IMO I1111llmll i0in ' ui 00Vn0 11'IIII MEN I'1'It MOSI1E-0Tfa1 1M1111 ___Illifieleili11 - 111111 ;; BINNIIIiIin�o !Eli II!! on _: :_aa ii111V1'1000i !0M1llll1lIIIVI111hii (DDI�aaI�2 n7 mm : 01 10I1lif i __ 10 I— ea :22 0110""j1111'm11,IIII111II1IN111 aaa 12 02 11 11 1 0011111 es:: 22 22 V111111t111ttNIIIIl111111111Ilitiiliiinliflllllllllllllll �� as I I CC C: 2222 22 22 m:• nl 100111I11100111110111011101011011i1 aa: as : ::.• m2 iia "o u_ 04F1:1 r:sea om mm 0 I ntl pp ra :a :� LIU �n ::. :_ a� — —22:2 _ 10jl 1110110 IV111NIIIIII11111VIIINIIVII 10P1iiIl 11111NIIVNV00IVNNIIi 0100001iieramell010011111 — D�. EE n :: :m � `` 100 D , o on, . 110.. :: __ ;22. 'F� oa II I Saab 0011E I(IN Iii e::: m :ee: Ime ob EE °on), 0 : ::: t, U: 1, gin oU 00 fit) EE al :: nti . 1E C mm mm 00 WEST ELEVATION TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES • :a nr, Ma IC2=I qv =LI 111 1 mm nn 1110 illnui I1IIIIIN0E0N11010ELIINPi 11111/011 a0000 IIIL0OVEENIEIL' LISS IViai- 111111110 Q1IN111181111llifil IIIElli 111IIIlEN1EM1I1111 22221.22 W n I II EbOLNIE _1100IIIElllL11 NiniulauA1111111 „IIan�11111111111111111110 L.l.l II 9IInIn n ne III INE I NN 00111011iu0fi11t ;iumlii 11111111 1111 1111 111 1 1 III 11111' iI IL' CA �n 11111 1E11 11: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVICiIie fiill 1111111 II! IIIIILIIIIIIIII III 'isiiliGi111111 "�iiiiiiiilll IIIIIIVIIIIIIIVIII1111 ' 1111NIill ca " IIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111 laa oIl 11111111 11111 1111 11111111 1 I'IOUIiliiiI 1liriaii0iael 1111111 111E1111 • es :: 7,7 i i i 1 ::: 22 22 Illll 11n gill rim n =1111nn ..QO••,,.,aAD1W1BIRNn wnuiliiailVVl. AIIIILIII�II 1111 'IIIILIIIIIIIIIIIII'glluji9!!I 111!!ill!1!iI0111111 liiiliiilliiiiliiidlllllll6 vv :aaa : : :: •• .3:'. 1000NI ®b1000 b111ialiu 01II�III I0V1111EMbi1iG111100i11VI :a:: l • • vv :::: 1111111 22 Ea 22 C_• I1 11 m:: NEE11n10M01001111 `6o11E1`unuileO' INENIl1M001I011NIIIIli1001111111011 EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRY 44' RIDGE 2 ENTRY GABLEIBEYOND EXTENDED STAY ONN (3 z W z< 1-a �a z F. rn xo N 3z W J x o 3W Architecture and Planning 3B' RIDGE 2 MAIN BLOC GABLE o / TRUSS 84G 111buulmoamlNEVEEEOLVu”' � " II0E011N011111um1u1um1ml IN 3RD FLOOR ;� II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII00I1'" � 'IIIILEEL10W01N0E 41111IIII ...:....... E0Mth1000 00ME0NIN01 E4 Al ®IIE011111VIILWimoiUOiillll 2N. FLOOR 0, a n' 111ILILIIIILIIIILLILEIIIIIII111111I ' 1l01ElEE0NVM01100N1 �� I lilt �. SIT , �r Ft mg. 0' III 111111117111 Ili Il1 �� 6� I�,!! l �'I SOUTH ELEVATION ENTRY AWNING TUBEANT DRAWINGS L RECY,LE NORTH ELEVATION ENCLOSURE \- TRASH ENCLO URE -Ga9LE BEY@(0 2 NAIN ENTRY „--STAIR GABLE / BEYOND L.95'•12743 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1/81 1 Rolce A Bag. A & Principal Y. Km K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 4th Are. 0. 1102 Seattle, Washington 00134 (206) 563 -6030 NO DESCRIPTION B.A.R. REVI51085 02 -14, -9 BAR. REVISIONS 02 -24 -9 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -29 -90 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIGN LOCATIONS File: 95024 \HELEV3 -2 JOB NO.: 66024 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 01.91-16 A Q ORAWN: 018 A -3 CHECK: ATTACHMENT Y Z Irw QQ �. UO to O: J N w 0' g -J 51 d • Fw. ZOO, W :2 U P. 1■-1 la it W W ix a ILL 1— t• U N` 'Z I:1111 N.I 2222 3B' RIDGE 2 MAIN BLOC GABLE o / TRUSS 84G 111buulmoamlNEVEEEOLVu”' � " II0E011N011111um1u1um1ml IN 3RD FLOOR ;� II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII00I1'" � 'IIIILEEL10W01N0E 41111IIII ...:....... E0Mth1000 00ME0NIN01 E4 Al ®IIE011111VIILWimoiUOiillll 2N. FLOOR 0, a n' 111ILILIIIILIIIILLILEIIIIIII111111I ' 1l01ElEE0NVM01100N1 �� I lilt �. SIT , �r Ft mg. 0' III 111111117111 Ili Il1 �� 6� I�,!! l �'I SOUTH ELEVATION ENTRY AWNING TUBEANT DRAWINGS L RECY,LE NORTH ELEVATION ENCLOSURE \- TRASH ENCLO URE -Ga9LE BEY@(0 2 NAIN ENTRY „--STAIR GABLE / BEYOND L.95'•12743 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1/81 1 Rolce A Bag. A & Principal Y. Km K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 4th Are. 0. 1102 Seattle, Washington 00134 (206) 563 -6030 NO DESCRIPTION B.A.R. REVI51085 02 -14, -9 BAR. REVISIONS 02 -24 -9 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -29 -90 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SIGN LOCATIONS File: 95024 \HELEV3 -2 JOB NO.: 66024 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 01.91-16 A Q ORAWN: 018 A -3 CHECK: ATTACHMENT Y Z Irw QQ �. UO to O: J N w 0' g -J 51 d • Fw. ZOO, W :2 U P. 1■-1 la it W W ix a ILL 1— t• U N` 'Z PPr; - „' CITY C]r MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER ENTRY SECTION tax SEwE 155 ROVE 10: SEWE sx SLDPE SOUTH - SECTION A -A LOOKING NORTH 130' 120 110' 102' • mtra0rtIW'�"' GWI LErJ+c1xS1 NORTH - SECTION B -B LOOKING NORTH SITE SECTIONS 1 10' 1 1 1-95"--00ta ATTACHMENT Z • c�0: • O` co w N • fuj 0, 13r id rQ; = 0; Z W • 1:014 IOI-- '.WUJ i :U y: • i.Ot. .:Z 1 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. Archlt.Ctura and Planning Rote A. Bag. A.I.A. Principal Y. Kan K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 4th Ass. S. /102 Seattle, Washington 66134 (206) 563 -6030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 01 -31 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -14 -91 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -24 -' i SITE. SECTIONS Fla: 95024 \SITESEC2 1.10 JOB NO.: 66014 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 1.6114 A DRAWN: DID A -4, CHECK: ATTACHMENT Z • c�0: • O` co w N • fuj 0, 13r id rQ; = 0; Z W • 1:014 IOI-- '.WUJ i :U y: • i.Ot. .:Z 1 MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER e,, .. ... fi: i�+ ur.?:. e5.. :...,�.;:G.�ii.4sl�..i�.rlk -�.. raw.:; i."ir,..�� ?�:>`zd::�2r::.hicli _.,_ ti. �.. ._ �+. t? G.S.ce;�1.e.Ln,.,.y.�•J,:;k ^.`. `.�..:::::�at.rs.n:i 202 SLOPE ADS SLOPE 10-4 SLOPE 52 SLOPE 120' 110' 100' 90' 80' 70' SECTION C-C LOOKING WEST 110' I 1 -4 0. .—CURII • PARKING DETENTION POND SECTION D-D LOOKING WEST ROOF PLAN 120'1 3 10' 00' 0' SITE SECTIONS 110'1 2 Litc-09.3 ENTENDD C DD Oaf] 4,5,./4" Architecture and Planning Royce A B. A.I.A. Principal Y. Ken K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 41h Ave. S. 002 Soottle. lerrelln9tca 98134 (205) 583-8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 02-14-9 BAR. REVISIONS 02-24-.- B.A.R. REVISIONS 02-20 1 ,._ SITE. SECTIONS ELEVATION ROOF PLAN Pk: 95024 \ 5E01-2 JOB NO.: 1014 SHEET NO OF: — 171 • 0v241420 5.-10• Sr 32-01 5 cE1DITIEN MO 521•C• J. DETENTION POND SECTION D-D LOOKING WEST ROOF PLAN 120'1 3 10' 00' 0' SITE SECTIONS 110'1 2 Litc-09.3 ENTENDD C DD Oaf] Architecture and Planning Royce A B. A.I.A. Principal Y. Ken K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 41h Ave. S. 002 Soottle. lerrelln9tca 98134 (205) 583-8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE B.A.R. REVISIONS 02-14-9 BAR. REVISIONS 02-24-.- B.A.R. REVISIONS 02-20 ,._ SITE. SECTIONS ELEVATION ROOF PLAN Pk: 95024 \ 5E01-2 JOB NO.: 1014 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 11.14•11 A-5 DRAM: .0 CHECK: ATTACHMENT AA '" ' - • - ' - • - 41y, CITY OF VILA MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER _•�C: '..Y.rwT.ws,.•. r,_ -:(L o+. :. +r , ., a.�At-:r��'r :n .ai:�;5 x;:, . ,-�pJ : 1 .. . . .. . ' .. " 1 EXISTING PARKING EASEMENT or •" the &&&&&&&&&& •1 one Property . IMMnr.t or rhos w.alnw..n.0 ..t p1r .. 1pnt t « e, • el..... tr7ffle.. u,w nl•ee1 .. ..runt u. . •ttl trthlt to wwl• A. [, •w i• I , .�-- -- -__ NO DESCRIPTION DATE —_ 61ST AVENUE SOUTH - -_ — -- v5 r, • • ue1,w "t . •11 Ivan wM.e et nueli�b and C •M tM.r suet a.IM•n eMll n �• .rf M• el a tae. t •r1M •rnt I... e" f t•tttn A.a•.Ya. C a .M.. I. C.nnn 1 n ave. vuh ea. s 0 �:• ........... t<.1 D. .wM __— __— ��— _--- _�= .`•'"t� ,S, 1.g' / %.% ! 9Q r ' ! I: i I I ! 'il• .� � :: o . • • • • �O.I [nett.. a. t e an.. el t.ne1 o aM .nett tnler.t, shalt have aM tight a• aM e.r v.,tt use M tale. 1111 ,r • located h the ".roman •tea.n of t•reel e • ,M.INn1a ewhl tans •. [. t .tt•tM ha a •w nwn•t•Ieu tent• T "n r•Itr•tn. A. • e•n that•. far the tasty. t e •n.t aw,.r •t «.n .f t••t•t D..e be... •nallnray .. the cone..( rut BM. VA NM.. ..elm .f•tell<n..•1 wt Y• t temrtb the a t....4-.........• \ � - ° ..III PYLON SIGN / r __ - 1 CSR- IOJSL'PS'�I-1 /, 9 •`��jj 1 \ �y = I I 1 I l _. Il._ /P ICI !•!L�LIl n/ I I �.. i 1/�113r+�1 'WO/ Id ! +- ` \ \ \\ k O y� I p __ - - -� -- ` _! (hl, p1E j ;[PION- I _�• " I I_I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I11'I I! I I I I 1A - j • walan. la• •vaeet..•. •,•1 .. w.IMt . 1 employ • •M❑ ha. • t t ........... '{ 'MI at-, n eowo. with • «.en •f •ttt . A... C. and D. t w. • putt al 1•M foray feet I. plant .. acre. J Inl M ahe t•vnatly nett' 101 le. M Memel• A .w C •• amtIM1M ' • , •w emf• Mfte1 D a• toe wn1M a.e•e .• M •our- 11•1.e• t "• "' "' _ ___ _____ Ion — _ - -_�__ _ _ _- _ -_ - -�- � `- ! b n-= . == - - I i - t . v _ _ - b Il cog fA¢Iel \ EXISTING BUILDING G:ovir -Er yr �y II EXISTING BUILDING I (pbT511S PROPOSED NEV SIDEWALK LOCATION L LIGHTING f t— •, I t� 1 1T -1711 t r •A` DIRECTIONAL SIGN ESA- IGTL- M.S /CF IT • at F .., &1 6....../.7‘,-- EXISTING CURB CUT Vu, F %LE.D. G Kral b Rit . A .. - - 61ST AVENUE SOUTH . At el - — -- _=.„-- _.. _ - .___ -- lei-1 /.Ash ®i NHS d� I5.�i!1!1 �mI I I I _. • • • o • \1 • /�^t U lit'. �' .. .j . • 't 1 — l�t;'t I ix it;' ?cat .'- 'Y.i(Srkry.I b`.�T- -1I I • 1 , -- == -- ---'; ! I I I I I I I I I W I I l l I I f� _•••-•1 - - - - -_ / EXISTING BUILDING 4) EXISTING CURB CUT F EXISTING BUILDING. I I NORTH 59RD AVENUE SOUTH „, ! - C%ISIING WALK NORTH SITE PLAN ROOF PLAN 140' 2 SITE LIGHTING PLAN 140'I 1 tf5'ct»2 ATTACHMENT BB Y.:}'iw%aren':ra,:re:: *'n ",�;7ii uft hr`7�i v' :3 d M1 ;itienC!XhNLi+�Sn:i i— 11% I.) o; 0. o J co 8 dl. !ii ". W WI' ■D Q( O N' 0 H; W' al Y,IO ILI Zt I.% N , `CO TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. r', Architecture and Plannn10 Rom A. Berg, A.I.A. Principal Y. Ken K. Olin. PrVcVd 1201 - 4th Are. S. /102 &elle, eloolOngton 96134 (206) 511 -5030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE BAR. RENX°IS 02 -14 -96 B.A.R. RENXONS BAR. RENXONS _..........2-29. SITE LIGHTING PLAN SITE ROOF PLAN rilD: 95024 \HLIGHT - 2 IN JOB NO.: 65054 SHEET NO OR DATE: 11.73.65 A -6 DRAWN: MD CHECK: ATTACHMENT BB Y.:}'iw%aren':ra,:re:: *'n ",�;7ii uft hr`7�i v' :3 d M1 ;itienC!XhNLi+�Sn:i i— 11% I.) o; 0. o J co 8 dl. !ii ". W WI' ■D Q( O N' 0 H; W' al Y,IO ILI Zt I.% N , `CO PERMIT CENTER 11, INSULATED EXTERIOR EDEEMED FINISH SYSTEM SMINGLCS —WHITE FRAMED WINDOWS NE-FINISHED RAILINGS PAINTED DOORS WEST ELEVATION TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES IIIIIIImil1IIIl11011111111111,1011111 110mmIllabran 1 001110 111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIINII I N I f g H 1 1 1 0 i l O H n l n h l ' I I I I I I I I I I H I I L L I I I u ° N kg s:� 1 al MIE I � T a A I •d fill l c s c a „ • n I � m - n a 1 es: 111. All I Mil �J�111111141111111HI6r' lllhnmNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIPdIIllnnuurlllllllPllnlluurllllllllNllllllllllllllllll� �� IIIIIIIIIIGI� l �i l6 ='as I H • .::aas ' I I li ilt ( . i.f : 'ilel ; -a — _ — 1 IIIIIIIII son llmunnllllmhmIIH IIIiH IGmn N IIIIIIgiHiiiiifiuglll IIJ 0111 110 HIIIIIIgmtIIIIGifiiifilll 11111111 0111 101 INIII— .I IIIIIIIIQIIIIII Inm111Ilui "q 111111111111111 ILI .I II III u IIIIQIIIIIIIII IIIIIII 1111111 IVuunullllllnnnlnll 111111 1111111 IIIHa MI 'MINI (tiff 2 a ! m. III 111111 1 III lllnml III /nnumlll 1111111 111111 111010M 1glq i.. i — — IVIII' ®�nj alro ���� `n��• o ':, ���Iro :a:. :3'a rn 4�j i = /`v\ ( \ � � �' .' j :::: ::•: (� �j :::: �uI �IDU I- 1— ■lllla�..rl __ 1QJIl■II� Z :Ca�aa6 :�la1) COI 0 J^/ \ I' Vin. TI I� :::: ate:: 'y!J!JI (�IOI :aaa 1111111as__IMiiiIIsa:I Ili el u ea •• :: ea a• e- lilll IHIIIQIIIIIIIIIIIpI liiflili If Ili li 1 !; °111 MTlgii"i'il Qm;; uVIQlWIVNVI ■ L...L,,II „�6��I61 VIlllll BIIIuWIuIVWIVIIVI1�fi� EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRY 14' RIDGE B ENTRY GABLE] BEYOND o 38' RIDGE B MAIN BLDG 1a) UI C NIIIQIIN1IH�wniiiillQlgynnnnagllllHH1Q 0 TRUSS BRG JIIIQIIIHIIIIIIIINIIIIIII I� e�es IllulnnuulllQHminlu 101100101 10 e�tl 11 :II'nra A c' 1 '� UII HIIIII II6IQ it e1e� :aa�w 'L':.:a.1. nnnulNQIIIInInINnIlI11VIQIlIINIQIIHI FM LT ssselUl➢ , .A a :l ....:a •HHQII Mlnnulml`NIIIdI'nnnlnN"IUI QIINQIQVIQIIIQ IIIIIIQIII: iI�G7 %% IIIIIIIIIIIIgifigfin- dltllNll�inillmigH I�•.GlII' 1 1[111 is�� ���Z QIIIIII NQHIQIINNNIVI Imalllrifil "uIIIIQII'iuiglq gin a eie'=J AIWI QNIIQNQIIIQI II7171,�a:etl dllugnunlillQIHINIIIIIHIII tic Seal IIII '1'iiiiinlYllIIIIIQIIIIHIIIN E>�tI[1SDaD}Sr�dh1;1- COR..'ICAa �HI yeeael 'iliilliilirlllQll'IiiinilTnlll a�en jj � Q ■�� IIIINQIIQIIIIQHIIIr�IIIIIIIIIIIQQIII �� (- aaa: sa _aeee�� I• H, ou Iaa . �nea Illlnlnlnnlgllllll as ::p • a aaa esa nuH :Ca - �RI= aa: :e: hunlnllQllrunnnnlld611111111Q1111 saa :7 a: sae •• dub as:: :neat 1lV aa....,s ;,.. IIII' IIQIIV' Igmlilnla�IIIIIIIIIUUmaluillllllllllpQQQIIR�f 11111111rifilln ,1 Ignannlogllllqllniliqfiql 1111 vl @I IVIIVINIQIQINII es: eaa rellii :a IIIInalliiGupllQululdl "n ��— ' p91■1= ae: e�ln miniu�IIQIIIaIlnnanlllNIIIIIN ss a :�: r• •• �7I� It IlVllulllllllll : aaa ::es :.1:::.... IueluunmllllllllllllllllllQ aaa0 ' rase Illrwannlllllllll @IIIIIIII ��� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIQIIVIIIIIQIIIIIIIIIIIII I. I :::a aae ;n::;.a:.....,::;.:: II'Imm�mlllllll'nlluunllll dNlllllllllllllllllllllllll aaaa aaea s: e: aaae � ® _IIIIIIIIIPIIIIIIII II • 1- • imi� I IIIN 1.. e.• s. I a'.:: L I I I L T �� 1 I sea aaa: N s sass - sa fu7 ul o Dp 100 0o ll0 0o a � v I DJI u., nu I aL: asa eaaa aaa: T l laggini n• n ill I.- u.® =�— t. Mme, -,00 a I' u nu .:r I ul WEST ELEVATION TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIAL NOTES IIIIIIImil1IIIl11011111111111,1011111 110mmIllabran 1 001110 111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIINII I N I f g H 1 1 1 0 i l O H n l n h l ' I I I I I I I I I I H I I L L I I I u ° N kg s:� 1 al MIE I � T a A I •d fill l c s c a „ • n I � m - n a 1 es: 111. All I Mil �J�111111141111111HI6r' lllhnmNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIPdIIllnnuurlllllllPllnlluurllllllllNllllllllllllllllll� �� IIIIIIIIIIGI� l �i l6 ='as I H • .::aas ' I I li ilt ( . i.f : 'ilel ; -a — _ — 1 IIIIIIIII son llmunnllllmhmIIH IIIiH IGmn N IIIIIIgiHiiiiifiuglll IIJ 0111 110 HIIIIIIgmtIIIIGifiiifilll 11111111 0111 101 INIII— .I IIIIIIIIQIIIIII Inm111Ilui "q 111111111111111 ILI .I II III u IIIIQIIIIIIIII IIIIIII 1111111 IVuunullllllnnnlnll 111111 1111111 IIIHa MI 'MINI (tiff 2 a ! m. III 111111 1 III lllnml III /nnumlll 1111111 111111 111010M 1glq i.. i — — IVIII' ®�nj alro ���� `n��• o ':, ���Iro :a:. :3'a rn 4�j i = /`v\ ( \ � � �' .' j :::: ::•: (� �j :::: �uI �IDU I- 1— ■lllla�..rl __ 1QJIl■II� Z :Ca�aa6 :�la1) COI 0 J^/ \ I' Vin. TI I� :::: ate:: 'y!J!JI (�IOI :aaa 1111111as__IMiiiIIsa:I Ili el u ea •• :: ea a• e- lilll IHIIIQIIIIIIIIIIIpI liiflili If Ili li 1 !; °111 MTlgii"i'il Qm;; uVIQlWIVNVI ■ L...L,,II „�6��I61 VIlllll BIIIuWIuIVWIVIIVI1�fi� EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRY 14' RIDGE B ENTRY GABLE] BEYOND SOUTH ELEVATION TUBEART DRAVINGS RECYCLE NORTH ELEVATION ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE GABLE BEYOND R MAIN ENTRY /BEYON STAIR D GABLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 11 /8'I 1 ATTACHMENT CC EXTENDED STAY EN z U w 2 o< c�a z~ ti so co w 32 w J X "3- Lu I-U. CC Architecture and Planning Royce A. Berg. A.I.A. Principal Y. Ken K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 41h Ave. 5. g102 Seattle. Washington 98134 (206) 583-8030 NO DESCRIPTION DAI! B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -14 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -24 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -29 -96 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LUMINARE DISTRIBUTION File: 95021 \HELE VS -2 1 /s' JOB NO.: 05024 DATE: 01.31.06 DRAWN: DID CHECK: SHEET NO OF: A -7 o 38' RIDGE B MAIN BLDG GABLE .! 0 TRUSS BRG F(�� IIQImIIIlligDiDNIQIIIIQIQI 0: 9 1 11: IIIIIIIIIIIQ1111116illitiiiHllilii IIII. 3RD FLOO4 m 'c' 111111111111111E1111111111111111111 PI �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGIIQIIIIIQIIQIIIQQI y jj � Q ■�� IIIINQIIQIIIIQHIIIr�IIIIIIIIIIIQQIII �� (- [Ali,\,UP '� 5'AR _aeee�� '�V :aaa all NQIQQIIIIIIVQIIIiiiiiiliiiiilil I .IIII � 15nI e51� ' IIIII111111llumiilIIIIIIIIQVIIIIIQI111 ��_ 2N. FLOOR P - IIIQHIIIIIIIIQI�uIQINQIIIQVQ01 11 II 1I- _ TII 1 1111 !III 1 II A1111 I. I _ 11.,.1,i, IIII II • 1- • ■ 1 ���vt I ■ V IT FIRER SOUTH ELEVATION TUBEART DRAVINGS RECYCLE NORTH ELEVATION ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE GABLE BEYOND R MAIN ENTRY /BEYON STAIR D GABLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 11 /8'I 1 ATTACHMENT CC EXTENDED STAY EN z U w 2 o< c�a z~ ti so co w 32 w J X "3- Lu I-U. CC Architecture and Planning Royce A. Berg. A.I.A. Principal Y. Ken K. Chin. Principal 1201 - 41h Ave. 5. g102 Seattle. Washington 98134 (206) 583-8030 NO DESCRIPTION DAI! B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -14 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -24 -96 B.A.R. REVISIONS 02 -29 -96 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LUMINARE DISTRIBUTION File: 95021 \HELE VS -2 1 /s' JOB NO.: 05024 DATE: 01.31.06 DRAWN: DID CHECK: SHEET NO OF: A -7 • CITY OF T li!'.'WVILA MAR .0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER .�._.......z......,,... i. 71:. 1e.,.. a.: u3;, i=. 4a',:. t..:. cl: i:. Cw:. Yi '.:.,LrS::xu...L.L:]LpY.a:r.. its.;. a+ f.... u. .«.v%_aiica::v;ac�n:dLfii1W:;: • w - •SVaY'u.Y:;: ;X.e r:: 6.S::fsb.i,rY 51ST AVENUE SOUTH - - ADDITIONAL CIF-alto CIV{U,N I.t (A eMCNMe5 CL A1'PKGV YL Lauchlin R. Bethune Associates • idinhtept Ara48seaa • &dra•nY•W Mimeo; ASIA 113Ill.eMM NMI Min en. 11441 /ss.11R M.•I. W.IMPM sIRI.I310 I•..• IN411H41R RAnat Y4.srasta WE- � o;u,.�.� '.� Mayrw,Know,v, s►e .a: -f•.• SR •516 2, rIttrelli ll IS" setwerf 0002:1.47 1)Vi --C• `i1W''X11r r7'IiC►M • R :+y', }4"—, -iii; . • P. t 5 = 01St_(b 0 0 Lam/ o `° IQD I c`1w�M1 i .tic I-- iUa�i::iL t�oYY ■i0' 7 i�51 �'apR: 41 -. _/ ti -tee.' y kN \ iixuals'1'' /\ \- __ -,•'o . \_ I e r Ile -- - `_i _. _ 111 __. - 'p — • �� -112. �0t — ) - '.L - tl '..leaa�t��}`. ,� uo t7 =AWL 2. �IN& /t� d r I' �I , r.d 17� allbe '' " • n. Oo � 1a4 ,'g . vw(. r/r'^ "tl TI ]Y \C ]211Y \ \ I.r- L— L._ �\ PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SOUTHCENTER BLVD TREE REPLACEMENT I.-- r 4MI•.••••• 4•.11M.14Y...M. N• Mat . _ __ ... t..yy . .l •••M'MYMS•••M••• Y•.4Y l4erwle. *Ne M• i. lr..1111. M 1r .Y Ir�YYlet.,f Ir INAlee••rMrl.t• ande • M IN ON V1M1d4Wge141. 11ulo[l.lms Tod Y Ls• after OIMrr sflels Nenist me .I�1.er lIM44 Cw.r Tnn• CIYr. CSI•.M.eM.f ley. .e..wtl•M• MMI.. LMM.M.O L•.M.Lrsn.r Is INN nen .I. erg IVI walk "4%ru..' .. =1 *wr Mew4M.. TREE PROTECTION DETAIL In.r•.Iw.r. - .-- Ara. 4 SMALL ILOM.SInC MII • r t...,. St. M IC.& •� // tom MM.i...M.ryYr ..... M.riry LT• -.ew.. wY. •4.w..• wA4•.4r'ww.4 •• ... /1...1.14•0N. Wm.. Yer.k• 14.1.1.N111,1...11........41/..16 MM.., 4.TInC Toss LA•c..v4c.A4 ROMRXC MRCS I... inn .W.en.en, dean Lelnte.Mnlw MMl er4+.Mw-' -' Yww. Iona Name ec,W A....11.6...•l. *knLMYrw� In.k W. M.WM•A+ menu arum. stoma.. seams •',wag,..I.W.MI•.e. ML 1...Y.41•y On IqW Ia.Wll.w.lw•...e •IY.4,M• !MALL //1.0.11111,C111.13• I pl. c..er M I'... nu .yl.Nys -M« Na. CROLXSC01'[.s • I. p.m Ir.. I.1.•..LM. [pX11•>.NMn4.. mop] AM1XI:Ah.w .awe 4• IM.M Ir... IASCI e.CIOL'OLI INAO[ TRR • SP.s ., 4. M Ts•... Pen 1.4.,r. n,c.IW.r.•wyJ. Nun YLMM.'Ta .. Mer'�II...L Vw s COXIR. tests • 44. MN..40 M IY.,. Omen IMI CS.OrSAUA, NORTH SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN.. 120' 1 1 ATTACHMENT DD 2 W` 6 m- i J U• U0. NO. U) W W =; CO LL W0 u- < V/ C WT H 01 z I-- w UO :0 N. O 1-: W W. Z - U �: • tll� U Z TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. Architecture one Planning Leeson Pomeroy Northwest Royce A. Berg. A.I.A. 1201- 4th Ave. S.. Ste 200 Seattle. Washington 98134 (206) 583 -8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE .1 A' 41(•( INI r I y c r 2 ITta ULWl,A MP 3 KCvlstON 891 SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN Fiie:95024/HOTLS SE . a JOB NO., 011014 SHEET NO OF: DATE: 11.18•H Lw 1 DRAWN:I 4 2 W` 6 m- i J U• U0. NO. U) W W =; CO LL W0 u- < V/ C WT H 01 z I-- w UO :0 N. O 1-: W W. Z - U �: • tll� U Z PFnr:v D CITY (jr ` LI,:v7ILA MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER ... �W._ x..::> �i�.;.�::+,•.�x� :':�.1::.u.,;JU ��.:':��:.::;�as::.s.�,.L,... .,. , .._.,::s�a,..�._,.,.,.. ..,,,r.�.;:i.SS.,�sx�..., ;:�.. Tukwila, WA -- COMING SOON Sign • ESA-191 SL-WS ESA -EOA I Pylon ESA- 196SL -PS FJ .......� a. -.,-.. _I °i- WILMS T ESA- 4SL -MS /OF -♦ 53rd Avenue reZTS NUM - -.•- wE/wrsiwfs sRmaA sun $. -sMass M' 1 o4r111.1) VMS L I Ewa w s sr OR MR waa U NO NMI LVIly NMI a =air 'IMM.... North EXTENDED STAY AMERICA F f f C I E N C I L S Site Plan Tukwila, WA Lam; = i U O u)w WI N g ILI H Design Number: z 24-96 R2 I— O. Z I—.; Sheet: w u 2 _, 1of10 Do. File Name: _ ■ o 1....,, rev2a.cdr , ;= W U Salesperson: :- O? R. Doughty ,iii z. coi Designer: o - T. Virdell z Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 02 -26 -96 lbbeArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208423 -1122 800582.2854 IJ5A 206-221 123 FAX;,,1LA MAR 0 if 1996 mil o Fall irgvNoTicER is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. Tukwila, WA 2T -0" on 12" centers. Angle Iron support on 4' - 0" centers. Mounting to be thru supports. :.sue +iF.g;'•iS:. "`Y,;i:' Internally- Illuminated 191 sq. ft. single faced wall sign. Scale: 1/4" = 1' - 0" • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler returns and retainers. Paint filler and returns PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. • Faces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. • Illuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° F). •,(1) 20amp 120v circuit required. • • Mount sign to special domer section to be built by G.C. G 1 S-0Dfi3 "P ) CITE( LF'i; :'JIlA MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER EXTENDED STAY A,YIERICA E t f C I E N C I E S 15" ESA- 191SL -WS Tukwila, WA Design Number: 4-96 R2 Sheet: 4 of 10 File Name: rev2c.cdr Salesperson: R. Doughty Designer: T. Virdell Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -19 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 1M: 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208 - 223.1122 800.582 -2854 USA 208 -223 -1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. 4 a tar Electrical 1 - penetration. .Th.J.... dt...•..,... - - - .,, .4. ' "R'qVA..:,i} {n - - - on 12" centers. Angle Iron support on 4' - 0" centers. Mounting to be thru supports. :.sue +iF.g;'•iS:. "`Y,;i:' Internally- Illuminated 191 sq. ft. single faced wall sign. Scale: 1/4" = 1' - 0" • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler returns and retainers. Paint filler and returns PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. • Faces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. • Illuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° F). •,(1) 20amp 120v circuit required. • • Mount sign to special domer section to be built by G.C. G 1 S-0Dfi3 "P ) CITE( LF'i; :'JIlA MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER EXTENDED STAY A,YIERICA E t f C I E N C I E S 15" ESA- 191SL -WS Tukwila, WA Design Number: 4-96 R2 Sheet: 4 of 10 File Name: rev2c.cdr Salesperson: R. Doughty Designer: T. Virdell Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -19 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 1M: 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208 - 223.1122 800.582 -2854 USA 208 -223 -1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. EXTENDED STAE' :4MERfC4 /,•$; n9 {vr{+arti:K I'n:,y . k�F °.x?'rr�... .. ""l:) .. d:M .' n. ^•—, is ?. Tukwila, WA 15 "1 10' -3 9' 10" ,.fir Fes.' -`_:} i;•^�i� ^�:, >:=; i': SPECIFICATIONS: Internally- illuminated 100 sq. ft. single faced wall sign. Scale: 1/4" = 1' - 0" ► Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler returns and retainers. Paint filler and returns PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. ► Faces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. ► Illuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° F). ► (1) 20amp 120v circuit required.. ► Mount cabinet to flat area of wall to be built by G.C. Z Limping diagram on 12" centers. Electrical penetration. Angle iron support on 4' - 0" centers. Mounting to be thru supports. L 9Y-Mt3 MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER ESA- 100STK WS Tukwila, WA Design n Number: 24-96 R2 Sheet: 5 of 10 File Name: rev2c.cdr Salesperson: R. Doughty Desit ner: 1 Virdell Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 llibepArt 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 206 -223 -1122 800.1582 -2854 USA 206-223-1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. OW041, .11,101.11 Tukwila, WA • 2 -11' 43' -91 OA. Height 27' -4• 24' - 4' 1,41---14' -7'� Open area EXT[NDEJ STAB AMERICA E E 1• I C I E N C 1 E 5 ['III'] It 7 WEEKLY 171/2' copy :43,161Y, . .11 QIe110Z (911: Electrical to feed thru pipe. J-Box (4' - 0' above grade) Electrical Conduit Bottom cabinet to read this before opening 15 1/2' Internally- Illuminated 199 sq. ft. double faced pylon sign. "Install 8 months before building begins. Scale: 1/8' or 1' - 0' • Upper decorative area of pylon to be constructed from sheet metal and angle iron construction. Paint background PMS 342C Green. Paint borders, trim, and decorative cladding PMS 498C Tan. Half circle area of sign to be open. • Top double face cabinet to be constructed from TubeArt aluminum extrusion #9 (91/2') body and #8 (21/4" x 3') retainers. Paint cabinet PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. • Pylon feces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS. One face to hinge open for access to lamps and ballasts. • Bottom double face cabinet to be constructed from TubeArt aluminum extrusion #9 (91/2') body and #8 (21/4'x3') retainers. Paint cabinet PMS 342C Green. Paint Interior of cabinet white. One face of cabinet to hinge open for access to lamps and ballasts. • Bottom cabinet faces to be 3/18' white lexan with 1st surface SIGNTECH 4048 Dark Green background. Copy area opening of sign to show -thru white with 3M 3830-22 Matte Black vinyl copy. Price numerals are to be black vinyl on clear plastic changeable panels. Clear tracks are to hold panels In place. Copy to read 'COMING SOON' when pylon Is placed at site. 'COMING SOON' copy to be 3M 3830-53 Cardinal Red vinyl, background to be 3M 3830-1491 U. Beige vinyl applied to 1st surface of 3/18' white lexan. When building Is complete and cabinet signage Is added to building, the price signage should be installed and 'COMING SOON" removed. • Illuminate cabinets with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12' centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballasts or equal (minumum starting temperatures -20° F). • Support pipe sizes T.B.D. Paint pipes and cladding PMS 4880 Tan. TubeArt to pour pipe footing. Footing dimensions and concrete yardage needed are T.B.D. • (3) 20amp 120v circuit required. Pipe size and footing dimensions to be engineered for this site according to local code and requirements. Pipe and footing to be provided by TUbeArt. L 95'.. oCt4 ;r t CITY ,;.:,.. •:;LA MAR 0 4 1996 PERMIT CENTER EXTENDED STA)' 4MERIC, , 1 C 1 t ESA- 196SL -PS Tukwila, WA 'CC U L) 0` V) p V) w • J co IL: 0 ko J! W: Design Number: z 2496 R2 Sheet: z 6 of 10 IL 0— '0 U1 W;. = Vt. Salesperson: LL R. Doughty O Ill Z; Desi ner: 0 N =, T. Virdell 0 I- :. iZ File Name: rev2c.cdr Date: 01 -17 -96 01 -25 -96 01 -29 -96 02 -14 -96 02 -26 -96 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 208-223-1122 800482-2854 USA 208223 -1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. Tukwila, WA POLE SIGN SPECIFICATIONS EXTENDED STAY AMERICA Section • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler and retainers. Paint filler and retums PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. • Pylon faces to be flexible substrate with SIGNTECH heat transferred graphics. See page with COLOR SPECIFICATIONS for logo colors. • Illuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent tamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -200 F). • Sign to be manufactured to U.L. specifications. CHANGEABLE PRICE Section • Cabinet to be constructed from steel angle iron frame with .063 aluminum filler and retainers. Paint filler and retums PMS 342C Green. Paint interior of cabinet white. • Faces to be 3/16" white lexan with 3M 3630 -22 Matte Black vinyl copy. Price numerals are to be black vinyl on clear ptastice changeable panel. Clear tracks are to hold panel in place. • IBuminate cabinet with 800 m.a. H.O. daylight white fluorescent lamps on 12" centers powered by 120v Advance rapid start ballast or equal (minumum starting temperature -20° 9. • Sign to be manufactured to U.L. specifications. SUPPORT STRUCTURE • Standard single pole steel structure primed and painted to match SIGNTECH 4660 Tan. Higher elevation signs to staged in multiple sections. Structures to be designed in accordance with local codes and conditions. COLOR SPECIFICATIONS • "EXTENDED STAY AMERICA ", "EFFICIENCIES ", and Inset border around sign background to be SIGNTECH 4660 Tan. • Rule Lines above and below "EFFICIENCIES" to be SIGNTECH 1030 Dark Red. • Background color and outside border at perimeter of face to be SIGNTECH 4048 Dark Green. • Retainers and fillers for high pylon signs are to be painted to match SIGNTECH 4048 Dark Green (PMS 342C Green). • Retainers and fillers for monument signs to be painted white. • Retainers and Oilers for building and wall signs to be painted to match SIGNTECH 4048 Dark Green (PMS 342C Green). • Steel pipe supports on pylon signs and base covers of monument signs are to be primed and painted to match SIGNTECH 4660 Tan (PMS 466C Tan). , G 9S- 0474a MAR 0 4 1996 P7=;iM T CDTEA 1.XfENDE1) STAY AMERfCA L i f C 1 L •J C I L S Color Specifications Various Signage Design Number: 4-95 R2 Sheet: 7of10 File Name: rev2c.cdr Salesperson: R. Doughty Designer: T. Virdell Date: 01 -17 - 96 01 -25 -96 02 -26 -96 2730 Occidental Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98134 206 -223 -1122 800.562 -2854 USA 206 - 223 -1123 FAX This original artwork is protected under Federal Copyright Laws. Make No reproduction of this design concept. 'Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Extended Stay Inn Tukwila, Washington -P MITC.E4T8F3 File No: 4830-001 -28- 1130/020796~ Geo4OEngineers February 7, 1996 ESA Development Inc. 1611 116th Avenue Northeast, Suite 228 Bellevue, Washington 98004 -3024 Attention: Mr. Dan Sterns Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Offices in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska INTRODUCTION We are pleased to present four copies of our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Proposed Extended Stay Inn, Tukwila, Washington." The scope of our services for this work is described in our proposal dated December 28, 1995. Authorization to proceed with the services was provided by Mr. Dan Sterns on December 29, 1995. Our scope of services includes additional test pit explorations in the area proposed for the detention ponds to supplement our previous study. The results of our previous study are presented in our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services and Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Hotel /Office Building Site, Tukwila, Washington" for Bedford Properties dated March 19, 1990. The preliminary results of our geotechnical study regarding the proposed detention pond location are presented in a memorandum titled "Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment, ESA Development Project, Tukwila, Washington" dated January 25, 1996. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS Based on our understanding of the proposed project and the results of our exploration and analyses, it is our opinion that the project can be constructed as proposed. The following section provides a summary of the significant geotechnical aspects of the project. A detailed discussion of these issues is presented in the text of this report. • The existing fill and native soil may be used for fill where compaction to about 90 percent of maximum dry density is adequate. Moisture conditioning or chemical stabilization will be necessary to achieve higher degrees of compaction. • The existing fill and native soil may also be exported from the site and used similarly as structural fill on other sites. GeoEngineers, Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone (206) 861 -6000 Fax (206) 861 -6050 Printed on recycled paper. ESA Development, Inc. February 7, 1996 Page 2 • The building foundations can be supported on the dense /hard native soil. • The planned detention pond location at the north end of the site is satisfactory providing a liner is installed to reduce the risk of seepage water from adversely effecting the adjacent slope. We appreciate the opportunity to be of further service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report or if we may be of further service to you at this time, please call. Yours very truly, Geo - ' gineers I :o cFadden, P.E. P ojec Manager . Peterson, P.E. ssociate JJM:LSP:vvl Document ID: 4830001.R2 cc: Mr. Royce Berg LPN Architecture and Planning, Inc. 1201 4th Avenue S, Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98134 0 Mr. Gary Warner Warner Engineering 5122 Olympic Drive NW, Suite B204 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE 1 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 GENERAL 4 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 5 Site Preparation 5 Structural Fill 6 Temporary and Permanent Slopes 6 Detention Pond Design 7 SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUPPORT 7 FLOOR SUPPORT 8 LATERAL RESISTANCE 8 PAVEMENT SUBGRADE 9 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 9 ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION 9 LIMITATIONS 10 FIGURES Figure No. Vicinity Map Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A - Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing APPENDIX A FIGURES Soil Classification System Logs of Test Pits Summary of Moisture Content G e o E n g i n e e r s Page No. A -1 Figure No. A -1 A -2 ... A -3 A -4 1 Fite No. 4830. 001 -28- 1130/020796 Appe CONTENTS (continued) Page No. Appendix B - Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing B -1 APPENDIX B FIGURES Figure No. Soil Classification System B -1 Logs of Test Pits B -2 ... B -6 Summary of Moisture Content B -7 G e o E n g i n e e r s )u Fil e No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED EXTENDED STAY INN TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR ESA DEVELOPMENT, INC. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for your proposed extended stay inn to be located in Tukwila, Washington. The site consists of two adjoining properties. The location of the site is shown in the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. We have reviewed preliminary plans titled "Extended Stay Inn, Tukwila, Washington for Extended Stay America, Inc." (Sheets A -1 through A -5) by LPN Architecture and Planning dated November 13, 1995 and the proposed detention pond layout by Warner Engineering which we received January 16, 1996. We understand that the two adjoining properties will be developed by building a three -story hotel. We further understand that cuts to about 14 to 16 feet deep will be necessary to achieve design grades. The proposed structure will be a wood -frame three -story structure with an on- grade floor slab and parking all around. The proposed lowest finished floor elevation will be about Elevation 114 feet. A detention pond will be located at the northeast corner of the parking lot above a slope. Based on the elevations shown on the plans, we expect that the detention pond will be excavated to about Elevation 98 and will have sideslopes inclined at 3H:1V (horizontal to vertical). The top of the berm which will form the side of the detention pond above the adjacent slope will be at about Elevation 104 feet. A previous geotechnical engineering study was performed on the north portion of the site for Qestar Development, Ltd. by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) in 1980. The report entitled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Office Building, 51st Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington," dated October 29, 1980, was made available to us previously by Bedford Properties. GeoEngineers also completed a previous geotechnical study of the site the results of which are presented in our "Report, Geotechnical Engineering Services and Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Hotel /Office Building Site, Tukwila, Washington" for Bedford Properties, Inc. dated March 19, 1990. SCOPE The purpose of our services is to provide an updated geotechnical report which includes recommendations for the proposed development. Our specific scope of services includes the following tasks: G e o E n g i n e e r s 1 File No. 4830 -001 -28- 1130/020796 W .6_ • JU 0 N0 Nw w 0, LL < 11: °. U O F-. 'w w!. Z tii U Ni _ 0 1. Review the design drawings for the proposed development and our previous geotechnical report. 2. Excavate three to four test pits using a rubber -tired backhoe in the areas proposed for the detention pond and bioswale. 3. Provide recommendations for earthwork including stripping and grading, removal of soft, organic or other unsuitable material, and backfill placement and compaction. This will include utility trench backfill recommendations, allowable permanent cut and fill slope inclinations, and evaluating the effects of weather and construction equipment on the workability of site soils. 4. Develop recommendations for foundation design, including allowable soil bearing pressures and settlement estimates for shallow foundations. 5. Provide passive lateral earth pressures for lateral load resistance against footings and the coefficient of base friction against sliding. 6. Provide recommendations for subgrade preparation and support of on -grade floor slabs. 7. Provide recommendations for design of detention ponds and bioswales. 8. Provide recommendations for surface and subsurface drainage systems based on the ground water conditions encountered or expected. 9. Provide recommendations for rockery design, as necessary. 10. Provide recommendations for pavement design for parking areas and access roads, including subgrade preparation requirements. The pavement design recommendations will be based on traffic information provided by the owner, if available, or typical traffic volumes for the proposed facility. 11. Provide a written report containing our findings, conclusions and recommendations. Our report includes the exploration logs from our 1990 study and a site plan showing the layout for the proposed development. SITE DESCRIPTION SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is bounded by S. R. 18 to the south, 51st Avenue South to the west, Southcenter Boulevard to the north, and the•Qestar Commerce Center to the east. Access to the site will be from the east. Portions of the site are significantly overgrown with grass, brush and blackberry vines. Considerable debris and trash are present on portions of the site. The north portion of the site is generally higher than the south portion. The ground surface slopes from about Elevation 128 near the northwest portion of the site toward the southeast where the ground surface is at about Elevation 96 feet. A slope along the north margin of the site extends down to the north at an inclination of about 30 to 35 degrees to a creek located adjacent to Southcenter Boulevard. The south portion of the site abuts S.R. 518 which is considerably lower than the site. G e o E n g i n e e r s 2 File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 .1 At the time of our 1990 study, a residence was present in the south portion of the site and the foundation of another residence in the north portion of the site. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface soil and ground water conditions were explored during this study at the proposed detention pond and bioswale location by excavating four test pits to depths of 2.5 to 14 feet at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Subsurface soil and ground water conditions were also explored during our 1990 study for other portions of the site. The locations of our previous test pits are also shown in Figure 2. A description of the field exploration procedures and logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. The field exploration procedures and logs of the test pits completed for our previous study are presented in Appendix B. The native subsurface conditions encountered generally consist of sand with a variable silt and gravel content overlying glacially consolidated silt. Fill consisting of silt, sand and gravel with varying amounts of organic matter was encountered over much of the site. The topsoil and root mass encountered is typically about 0.3 to 0.5 feet thick. Between 6 to 9.5 feet of fill was encountered in Test Pits 1, 2 and 8 from our previous study and test pits 1 through 3 for this study, which were located in the north portion of the site. In addition, approximately 3 feet of fill was encountered in Test Pits 5 and 6, located along the southwestern margin of the site and 2 feet or more in the test pits located along the east margin of the site. The fill encountered generally consists of gray to brown, medium stiff silt and brown, loose to medium dense sand with silt and gravel. Roots and wood debris were also noted in the fill. The fill is similar to the on -site native soils and may have been placed during construction of the houses which previously occupied the site or during construction of the Qestar Commerce Center which is located east of the site. The surficial native soils encountered where the fill was not present generally consists of about 1 to 2 feet of dark brown, loose silty sand with gravel containing variable amounts of organic matter and roots. Below this unit or the fill, approximately 2 to 3 feet of gray to brown, medium dense sand with a variable silt, gravel and cobbles content was encountered. Brown to gray, very stiff to hard silt was encountered below the native sand or fill to the bottom of most of the test pits at a depth of from 11 to 16 feet. On the north margin of the site, dense silty sand was encountered below the upper layers and extended to the bottom of test pits 1, 2 and 3 completed for this study. These units were very difficult to excavate and most of the test pits were terminated due to practical refusal. Ground Water Conditions: Ground water conditions encountered are indicated on the individual exploration logs. Minor ground water seepage was observed in most of the test pits and is indicative of a shallow perched condition. While the ground water conditions should be expected to fluctuate as a function of season, precipitation, and other factors, we do not expect significant ground water to be encountered at the site. G e o E n g i n e e r s 3 File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 z ",w D JU :U0. wn N W =. CO LL: ; u- a. D • d; uf D G. • 0 1- �w w' lii z, U -' z CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL It is our opinion that the site may be satisfactorily developed as proposed utilizing shallow foundations bearing on the very stiff to hard silt or on structural fill over the silt. Based on the proposed building location and the lowest finished floor elevation, we expect that the footings will be located at a sufficient depth to extend below the zone of existing fill and will be supported on the very stiff to hard silts. Placement of fill may be required in the south portion of the site to support paved parking areas. Based on our experience, together with our observations of the subsurface conditions and our field reconnaissance, it is our opinion that the slope along the north margin of the site is stable. Some shallow sloughing could occur in localized oversteepened areas. We recommend a minimum building setback from the slope, at foundation elevation, of 25 feet from where native soils daylight on the hillside. Under these circumstances, it is our opinion that the proposed development will not significantly affect the stability of this slope. Any surface water from the site development should be routed away from the steep slope. Most of the native soils and the fill soils we observed include a relatively high percentage of silt (fines) and are consequently water - sensitive. It will be difficult, if not impossible, to properly compact these soils when wet or during periods of wet weather. Thus, these particular soils are not suitable for use as structural fill under wet conditions. The native soil may be suitable for use as structural fill outside of the building area where a lesser degree of compaction is needed, such as in parking and roadway areas, provided that proper moisture conditioning can be achieved. In our opinion, the existing fill present on the north portion of the site and the native soil which will be removed from the site may be suitable for use as structural fill on other sites provided proper moisture conditioning is obtained prior to placing and compacting the soil. Based on the laboratory moisture content determinations, this material, in its present state, is too wet for compaction to more than about 90 percent of maximum dry density (per ASTM D- 1557). We recommend that some aeration of the soil to reduce the moisture content be included in your schedule and budget for use of this material, whether on this or other sites and that the material be used only in the portions of fill for parking and roadway areas where compaction to 90 percent of maximum dry density is adequate. Trafficability on most portions of the site under wet conditions will be difficult and may result in considerable surface soil disturbance. If wet weather construction is necessary, disturbed wet silty soils in building and pavement areas will need to be removed and replaced with structural fill consisting of clean granular soil. We recommend that the earthwork for the project be completed during the drier summer months in order to reduce grading costs. A perched ground water condition may be encountered during the wet season, particularly within the surficial soils above the hard silt. Some ditching to collection sumps and pumping or other means of controlling ground water may be appropriate during wet weather. G e o E n g i n e e r s f:;;�`ri?.i:Ci;4,.Uii.:?v'e_ _= ,1����' ••�tura:kt ,� ;,i,&,r; —..- •-,;;,;,, 4 File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Site Preparation We understand that the two residences and their foundations previously located on the site have been removed by the previous property owner. An underground heating oil tank was removed near the residence on the south portion of the site. No record exists regarding the removal of any tanks which may have been present near the residence on the north portion of the site. If during excavation underground tanks are encountered it will be necessary to remove them in accordance with the guidelines established by Washington State Department of Ecology. The existing fill on the north portion of the site was evaluated during our environmental services and during test pit explorations. No significant debris or other deleterious material was observed in the test pits completed by GeoEngineers on the site. If however, debris is encountered during excavation special handling and disposal methods may be necessary. We recommend that the building and pavement areas be stripped of any sod /topsoil and forest duff. Based on our explorations, the stripping necessary will generally be on the order of about 6 inches, but areas with greater stripping depths may be encountered. This material should be disposed of off site or used for landscaping purposes. We expect that all of the soils encountered across the site will be able to be removed with conventional excavating equipment. However, it may be necessary to rip the hard silt in localized areas to facilitate excavation. Those areas which are stripped or excavated to design subgrade elevations, or are to receive structural fill, should be evaluated by a representative from our firm. We recommend that the exposed subgrade in the building and pavement areas be evaluated by either proofrolling or probing to identify soft or loose areas. We recommend proofrolling not be performed if the subgrade soils are very stiff silt, similar to that encountered in our test pits, or during wet weather if the subgrade soils are silty and susceptible to disturbance. Under these conditions, probing should be used. If construction needs to continue during wet weather, it may be necessary to overexcavate and replace material disturbed in the construction process. A layer of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve should be used to replace disturbed soils and to provide a more stable working surface. Based on the proposed building location we expect that the existing fill on the site will be removed from the building area. We recommend that the suitability of all existing fill within pavement areas be evaluated by our firm. It may be necessary to remove some or all of the fill from within portion of the pavement areas if soft or loose zones are identified during site grading. During dry weather, the excavated material could be stockpiled and protected from moisture for reuse as structural fill, provided it meets the requirements subsequently defined. G e oE n g i n e e r s 5 File No. 4830-001 -28- 1130/020796 z re I"' 6 UO; . u) a; W w. N LL w O. LLa z Ci 1- W.. 2�i 'D 0: O U. :O Hi w w: l..z. w co Structural Fill Based on the existing topography and planned lowest floor grade, no filling should be required in the building area except the base course layer for the first floor slab. All new fill in pavement areas should be placed and compacted as structural fill subsequent to proofrolling and any remedial work as appropriate. All structural fill material should be free of organics, debris and other deleterious material with no individual particles larger than 6 inches in diameter. As the amount of fines (that portion passing U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve, particularly during wet weather. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight cannot be properly compacted when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. Some of the surficial on -site soils have a fines content significantly greater than 5 percent. Attempts to use this material for structural fill should not be made except during periods of extended dry weather. If the site soils are stockpiled and significant drying occurs, it may be necessary to moisture- condition the soil by adding water to achieve the necessary compaction. The fill should be placed in horizontal Lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness and each lift thoroughly and uniformly compacted. Fill placed in the building and pavement areas must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557), except in pavement areas where the fill below a depth of 2 feet from subgrade elevation must be compacted to at least 90 percent. These procedures apply to all utility trench backfill. Utility trenches outside of building or pavement areas need only be compacted to a density similar to the native soil adjacent to the trench. Temporary and Permanent Slopes For planning purposes, we expect that temporary cut slopes of 1:1 could be used for construction of the project. Slickensides were noted in the hard silt at one location. If extensive, this could result in isolated areas of instability of cuts at this inclination. We recommend that temporary cut slopes be the responsibility of the contractor who will be on -site on a continuous basis and will be best able to observe site conditions and monitor the performance of the excavations. Temporary slopes should conform to all applicable local, state and federal safety regulations. Surface runoff should be prevented from entering the excavations by installing curbs, berms, drainage ditches or swales at the crest of the slopes where needed. Temporary cut slopes should be covered with plastic sheeting or an equivalent protective covering during periods of wet weather to reduce the potential for erosion. We recommend that permanent slopes be constructed no steeper that 2H:1V except in the area of the detention ponds which is discussed below. Permanent slopes should be hydroseeded or otherwise protected from erosion. Temporary erosion control measures may be necessary until permanent vegetation is established. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 PAVEMENT SUBGRADE We recommend the pavement subgrade be prepared in accordance with the previously described site preparation and earthwork recommendations. We recommend that the pavement subgrade be compacted such that the density of the top 12 inches of the subgrade is not less than 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on the ASTM D -1557 test procedure. In areas where existing fill soils are exposed at the subgrade, it may be necessary to overexcavate a portion of the existing fill, recompact and /or replace it with structural fill in order to achieve the recommended subgrade density. A 6- to 9- inch -thick subbase layer of clean (less than 5 percent fines) pit run sand and gravel may be required to protect the subgrade if grading occurs during wet weather. We do not have specific information on the frequency or loading of vehicles which will use the area. However, we generally recommend a minimum pavement section consisting of 3 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 6 inches of densely compacted crushed rock base course for access roads and in maneuvering and parking areas with truck traffic. For areas of the site in which traffic will be limited to passenger automobiles only, the pavement section could be reduced to 2 inches of AC over 4 inches of crushed rock. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS The site could experience seasonally shallow perched ground water conditions due to the relatively impermeable soil which occurs at shallow depths. Therefore, we recommend the building be provided with a system of perimeter footing drains. The footing drains should consist of at least 4- inch - diameter perforated drainpipe embedded in a zone of sand and gravel containing less than 3 percent fines. This zone of sand and gravel should be at least 18 inches wide. This perforated drainage system should be sloped to drain into a tightline collection system, to a suitable discharge, preferably connected to the storm sewer. The pavement and surrounding landscaped areas should be sloped so that surface water runoff is collected and routed away from the building to suitable discharge points. We recommend all downspouts be tightlined away from building foundations preferably to the storm sewer. Downspouts are not to be connected to footing drains. ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION We expect that rockeries up to about 4 feet or more in height will be used to support both cuts and fills on portions of the site. It is important to realize that rockeries do not provide soil retention and are not intended as retaining structures. The primary purpose of a rockery is to protect the slope face from erosion and ravelling, while providing limited soil retention. Rockeries are an alternative wall type which are usually less costly than structural walls but involve more risk of slope failure. There is always some risk of rockery movement or failure even when the foundation and retained material are satisfactory and the rockery materials and construction are satisfactory. G e o E n g i n e e r s 9 File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 qz �. �U.1 J0 00, co 0, w w; J: CO w Oi g a: (/) a I— w. z� o; Z UJ U 0: w W; I— 0 U. 5; z 0 -:. 0 z .... • The rockeries should be installed by an experienced and skillful craftsman in rockery construction. We recommend that rockeries be constructed in accordance with the guidelines presented in the Associated Rockery Contractors "Standard Rockery Construction Guidelines" dated 1989. If rockeries in excess of 4 feet in height are required for portions of the project, we should be contacted to review the specific requirements and provide design recommendations. Rockeries supporting fill and traffic loads should be reinforced with a suitable geotextile. The fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density for a distance equal to the height of the wall up to a maximum of 8 feet. Vehicle wheel barriers should be provided in the parking areas to restrict access immediately adjacent to the top of the rockery. Barriers should be placed back from the face of rockeries supporting fill a distance equal to the height of the wall. Surface drainage above the rockery should be diverted or collected and carried in closed conduit to a point below the rockery. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by ESA Development, Inc., their architects, engineers and other members of the design team for design of this project. Our report, conclusions and recommendations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The project was in the early design stage at the time this report was prepared. We expect that further consultations will be necessary as design work progresses. Our scope does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the locations of explorations and also with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the project budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to (1) determine if the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, (2) to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and (3) evaluate whether or not earthwork activities comply with our recommendations and the contract plans and specifications. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. • O • G e o E n g i n e e r s 10 File No. 4830-001-28-1130/020796 4: We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and look forward to working with you further. If you have any questions concerning this report or should you require additional information, please contact us. .4'0/2S66T9E3i- cy% NAL '‘‘ !EXPIRES '3 / 4/s•7 I • JJM:LSP:vvl Document ID: 4830001.R2 GeoEngineers Respectfully submitted, / a)oEn;neers,/Inc.: /*/ / Bo McFadden, P.E. Pro'ect Manager 11 ssociate 4'9 eterson, P.E. File No. 4830-001-28-1130/020796 4o _ „... , 4-00 • S 133RD ' 135Th • 14 FOSTER 4 <44)6. LINKS S 150Th ST LAJ ---P0:-4— STRANDER I BLVD ST 27 168TH H 5 167114 ST ST TRECr. IND, 172ND PL ST CORPORAT DR ft CORPORA OR 0 2000 4000 SCALE IN FEET R BLVD Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. — its• Geo Engineers VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 a • • e ••• 1 • 74.3i-..7--......:37%;:217,--ii.......\-.: ,..1•1 114 /9 4.2.4) r\., ' ,,'. .. \ ), \• ., / c x.15. .,• .1 ; / / / i i . 4' 'T 1..F.., .. /./ ‘. ,,- . /.....1.,• R. \ ( (14 , Y -1; p.5 ....spx.ocic Ns. i i ) ) \ ; ' A\ I , i 4 mel:;,: % ,, ..„.,/ . • "). \ \ -...... .... •., .. , , , . , . , ..4 \,,, \‘. / I : / / l' • ; I ! I .• ' -7•1 ••••• s ................. ... ...... • . It, 51ST AVENUE SOUTH VMER //.N. IT P ../., \ '`.. :-.... ..: ... e.f...... ..,_. ..''i •, 4yr.g.t.. ".. .97 . • ROCK \ Y 4' TTAx.-i •wr.e.1.1 L7W _ — i ...„ ••,...-ItAAsCEmIRENICTLI. I. CthitliMICL'IMII s.‘ r-i, -.- — --Its.....-:_- — ..., F . ....... a, ., 4-0•0_,,,:::....:: t 1 ' ( c pit- • --von I , v, ( i 41 \ ; .... -../:::: cir—(1ii.---i. ( 6. is) -i- — — --: . — — --- — -- —i \ k) ., /..1. \ IL__ TP4:191-0:.-.AXDIN 3 ci 2' I # TP-1 (1-1.1•11 .N .. r 1 1 - L 0 cc•-\-.:.%. ) ' .:,%\ .... .......\\ ..\.; *../1.1,..s.1 /..:f. I. -... ,._,.A..)...\., , , , . , :-.1.•.t.- PARCEL B \ N. /-1RCS •0 pr. , PEMOTIC D SEC /CI AND SAPE P1Ar. • • ,sv\k‘ ) A TP-4 .7Cr„ISTITTS TY\ sTVER •N'f cvEiory) \-0( L. i //, folit. • .. I. I ; 1 e- 1 • ,5 \ \ % , 1 1 ‘2.1:4 '• ••.... I t ' I,,, /.,,....-.... 1 y, \ li f \/ s, , ,„ , \\ • f.ExIsTIN6 LAKE\ \•\ • ‘' • • 11. O,/ 4. C \ ‘4 \ ........-........-............ . , r —:---1,-7 -)\•. ,.\.:\ ..\ ,,,‘ EA..>Erl --, 1 1\\ ' ' *.10;s 1 \ \ 'Ss. •.'.•:s*, j\ ric'e • ss*:•'s-..‘. s- ..„.. ,,‘ ...... N. s... l N N EXISTING BUILDING uvi •o TP-8.t • • ::-.'.../..: I • 6 - • -EXIST 8' vATER LI •,T.,, TO Pe RELOCATED ... ....62___ - - -- TP-3 -- .::...."..........-.....3 ... 15-E} TP-2 g':,*lit...t7-7. ---•••••/:?.T.C..ccra.:vrr.F.:Cf...rxr ...11F1..1f1Swit.E . . TP 4 •• 1-..\ 11..,.1.r..f6-„ '‘-s. -•• ''.. ... ..(.. . . : ,..:— . 7::, (t..4 so '• ' C9 ... ...._ . TP-7 ,,,,) ,.....- .1........... ..... ti....,, 7,-..-.N. - Ita ■:141iNkRY i'' %%X. V.: ■ 111 /r 1 7- jig' TRU //v.ERIry f MVP* PRIVATE DRIVE Reference: Drawing entitled Site Plan, Preliminary,' by LPN Architecture and Planning, revised 12/15/95. N // ....... ..... . ..... ExislING ..•■■■■••••■•• EXPLANATION: -tifii-TP4 TEST PI1 -01-TP-9 TEST PI1 STUDY[ Note: The locations of ..,# Geo vim ..... .1- 51ST AVENUE SOUTH I a WATER •••••••••"■■• • • ...•• 37;13 '47 - \ :.›.— ELECTRICAL L CEDINVIMCATIDN ./ EASEMENT ,. —I \ 'a __ — __ __. ..._ _ _ TP-9 ' •',4-- -I - •- . -,. 0-x 32 Nyzi I 1.13ADG - • -., tti N ... ger I I 4, 1 -1--- --1.., 1. 1 I 1 1 1 _12...J., F. _ I. --....--":1-.•::-:F-7"....r-7.--i, 1-71, 1 I I 1 I I N. I r..:1---1•:.- PARCEL A /h. C C .... MA . (-4.' • .._. _.. . 1ST. 8' %/ATER LI • ---- '•-• .. ... PE R LOCATED ....• . . . ........ ..... „ 57.;77-47.7,7.1777F-1. ./ • • ' '9/ / / • ( 1•f • / /4;30; r'd • • r \-1.:■14-1-4 Li/ I / • 1 I; • 'I .• fir TP-1 (L•1•1•141 II if/ I liii I ./ ,•' ; • \--TRASH CPEEm LINE . • . • • • ,• , • . • • -.• 11••• si • Tp -7 rtn. gEr • einsvALE --11.1477.Cc r:t.t:rspoct - - ••• . v C C t • " I t9) • . • ::RTirckaY 'TP-4 .• /SEv / N !TIN' „•'' 7 I rItIG ATE DRIVE 5. le3AV , ‘■,•\ ,••••••;••'e , ,s• • \ TP-2 \ . ' \ ,I.+ • s • \ , DE1 EtZT %.) \ r!or41)..., ) ) ) i I 1,•&' "--. •' ._••••' • •••••-' 1 ••. TP-3 EXPLANATION: TEST PIT FOR CURRENT STUDY -E13-TP-9 TEST PIT FROM PREVIOUS STUDY DATED 03/19/90 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Note: The locations of all features shown are approximate. 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET elCup0ao3 -9II1 Geo e, Engineers SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 S. Z w W U. 0O CO 0, U) W: J 1' WO g J' H Z 11.1 LLI U 0. 0- 0 H = Wf U. ~O: 111 Z' N O z APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the site were explored by excavating 4 test pits using a rubber -tired backhoe at the approximate locations shown in Figure 2. The test pits were excavated on January 17, 1996 and were located in the field by pacing from existing site features. Ground surface elevations are based on site topography shown on the "Site Pan, Preliminary" by LPN Architecture and Planning revision dated December 15, 1995. The test pits were continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who visually classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, observed ground water conditions and prepared a detailed log of each exploration. Soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A -1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A -2 through A -3. LABORATORY TESTING All soil samples were brought to our laboratory for further examination. The results of moisture content determination are presented in Figure A -4. G e o E n g i n e e r s. A - 1 File No. 4830-001 -28- 1130/020796 i 1 i GEI 85 -85 Rev. 05/93 Z , re 2 V O' N 0: '_ CO U. W0 g. u-Q. D. v'. LU. Z , 0. Z [F— W W; 2 Di 0; 0 co 0 ~; W W U. O W Z. UN O; SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY- GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL- GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY- GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Passes No. 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY • Liquid Limit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit 50 or More INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488 -90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487 -90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on • interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. itt GeoeEngineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A -1 Z , re 2 V O' N 0: '_ CO U. W0 g. u-Q. D. v'. LU. Z , 0. Z [F— W W; 2 Di 0; 0 co 0 ~; W W U. O W Z. UN O; DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL 0.0 - 0.4 0.4 - 6.5 6.5 - 7.5 7.5 - 13.0 13.0 - 13.5 13.5 - 14.0 LOG OF TEST PIT DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP -1 Approximate ground surface elevation: 112 feet Topsoil and root mass SM /ML Brown silty fine sand to silt with sand (loose to medium dense, moist) (fill) SM Blackish brown silty fine to medium sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) SM/ML Orangish brown silty fine sand to fine sandy silt with occasional cobbles (medium dense /stiff, moist) SP SM Grades to brown at 9.0 feet Brown fine to medium sand with a trace of silt (medium dense, moist to wet) Gray silty fine to medium sand with cobbles (dense, wet) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 14.0 feet on 01/17/96 Moderate ground water seepage observed at 13.0 feet Minor caving observed at 2.5 feet Disturbed soil samples obtained at 1.0, 7.0, 8,0, 13.0 and 14.0 feet TEST PIT TP -2 Approximate ground surface elevation: 112 feet 0.0 - 0.3 Topsoil and root mass 0.3 - 5.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (loose to medium dense, moist) (fill) 5.5 - 8.0 ML Brown fine to medium sandy silt with occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) (fill) 8.0 - 14.0 SM /ML Brown to gray silty fine to medium sand to fine sandy silt with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense to dense/hard, moist) (glacial till) Test pit completed at 14.0 feet on 01/17/96 Slow ground water seepage observed at 13.0 feet Severe caving observed at 6.0 feet Disturbed soil sampled obtained at 1.5, 6.0, 8.0, 11.0 and 14.0 feet THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo O Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE A -2 DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL LOG OF TEST PIT DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP -3 Approximate ground surface elevation: 104 feet 0.0 - 0.4 Topsoil and root mass 0.4 - 2.0 SP -SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt (loose, moist) (fill) 2.0 - 2.5 SM Gray silty sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) (fill) 2.5 - 3.5 SP -SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt and occasional cobbles (loose, moist) (fill) 3.5 - 6.0 ML Brown fine sandy silt with occasional gravel (medium stiff, moist) (fill ?) 6.0 - 7.5 SM Black silty fine to medium sand with occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) 7.5 - 9.0 SM Gray silty fine sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) Test pit completed at 9.0 feet on 01/17/96 Slow ground water seepage observed at 8.0 feet No caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 1.0, 4.0, 6.5, 8.0 and 9.0 feet TEST PIT TP-4 Approximate ground surface elevation: 102 feet 0.0 - 0.3 Topsoil and root mass 0.3 - 2.5 SM Brown silty fine sand with gravel (loose, moist) (fill) Test pit completed at 2.5 feet on 01/17/96 due to rapid ground water seepage Rapid ground water seepage observed at 2.5 feet Moderate caving observed at. 1.0 foot Disturbed soil sample obtained at 1.0 foot THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo \� Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE A -3 tSGs+, i�:: �t'. u:, eY�4a"% 1' Xir'.•.:,;. ,. i„ �tii^2 1.` 5�, u:.—" r:+i'vliiS.:a14�'i:�u:.:8�e,�: :...,..,,�„ .. SUMMARY OF MOISTURE CONTENT Test Pit Number Depth of Sample (feet) Soil Classification* Moisture Content ( %) 1 1.0 ML 22 1 7.0 SM 25 1 8.0 SM 25 2 1.5 SM 22 2 6.0 ML 24 2 11.0 ML 25 *Refer to test pit logs for complete soil description. Geo i Engineers SUMMARY OF MOISTURE CONTENT FIGURE A -4 . • • • •:(,• r ,• r, -... • •r; • 1 APPENDIX B FIELD EXPLORATIONS The general subsurface conditions were explored at the site by excavating nine test pits with a tractor - mounted backhoe on January 11, 1990. The approximate exploration locations are shown in the Site Plan, Figure 1. Ground surface elevations are based on site topography shown on the "Site Pan, Preliminary" by LPN Architecture and Planning revision dated December 15, 1995. The exploration locations were determined in the field by measuring from site features. Excavation of the test pits was monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who maintained detailed logs and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered for further examination in our laboratory. The soils encountered were visually classified in accordance with the system shown in Figure B -1. The logs of the explorations are presented in Figures B -2 through B -6. The densities noted on the logs are based on the difficulty of digging and our experience and judgment. LABORATORY TESTING A summary of moisture content tests for selected samples is presented in Figure B -7. G e o E n g i n e e r s B - 1 File No. 4830 - 001 -28- 1130/020796 tr. GEI 85 -85 Rev. 05/93 IX 2 0O. . .N O' U) W: H N UL: W 0' 2 g J; Z': 1- a Z I— LU V O N 'Of— = Vj F- 0; • 0 17 ' SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME • COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY- GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL- GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY- GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Passes No. 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit 50 or More INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488.9O. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487 -90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. Geo �' Engineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE B -1 IX 2 0O. . .N O' U) W: H N UL: W 0' 2 g J; Z': 1- a Z I— LU V O N 'Of— = Vj F- 0; • 0 17 DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL 0.0 - 0.3 0.3 - 1.5 1.5 - 7.0 ML SP -SM /SM LOG OF TEST PIT DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 1 Approximate ground surface elevation: 128 feet Organic matter and root mass Mottled gray to brown silt with occasional sand and gravel (medium stiff, moist) with roots to approximately 0.5 inch diameter scattered throughout (fill) Gray to brown fine to medium sand with silt and trace gravel to silty fine to medium sand with trace gravel (medium dense, moist) with charred wood, roots and decomposed wood scattered throughout (fill) 7.0 - 9.5 SP -SM/ML • Light brown to brown fine sand with silt grading to silt with trace of fine sand, and trace of coarse sand and gravel (medium dense /stiff, moist) 9.5 - 13.5 SP/ML Brown silty fine sand to silt grading to grayish brown silt with trace of sand and occasional gravel (dense /very stiff, moist) Test pit completed at 13.5 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal No ground water seepage observed No caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 1.0, 3.5, 7.5, 11.0 and 13.0 feet 0.0 - 0.3 0.3 - 2.0 2.0 - 6.0 6.0 - 9.0 9.0 - 13.5 ML SM SP ML TEST PIT 2 Approximate ground surface elevation: 114 feet Organic matter and root mass Gray to brown silt to silt with fine sand (medium stiff, moist) with roots scattered throughout (fill) Brown fine to coarse silty sand with trace gravel (medium dense, moist) with roots scattered throughout (fill) Gray to brown fine to coarse sand with silt and gravel and occasional cobble (medium dense, moist to wet) Gray to brown silt with trace of fine sand (hard, moist) Test pit completed at 13.5 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 6.0 feet Minor caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 1.0, 3.0, 7.0 and 12.0 feet THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo �'-i Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE B -2 DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL LOG OF TEST PIT DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 3 Approximate ground surface elevation: 117 feet 0.0 - 0.3 Organic matter and root mass 0.3 - 4.0 SM Brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense to dense, moist to wet) 4.0 - 12.0 ML Brown silt to silt with fine sand, grading to gray silt (very stiff grading to hard, moist) Test pit completed at 12.0 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 0.5 foot No caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 5.0 and 10.0 feet TEST PIT 4 Approximate ground surface elevation: 110 feet 0.0 - 0.3 Organic matter and root mass 0.3 - 2.0 SM 2.0 - 3.0 SP 3.0 - 13.5 ML Dark brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (loose, moist) with roots up to approximately 1 inch diameter scattered throughout Gray to brown fine sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense to dense, moist to wet) Mottled gray to brown silt to silt with fine sand, grading to brown silt to gray silt (stiff grading to hard, moist) Test pit completed at 13.5 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 2.0 feet No caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 2.5, 4.0, 10.5 and 13.5 feet THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo � Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE B -3 I n( DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL LOG OF TEST PIT DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 5 Approximate ground surface elevation: 114 feet 0.0 - 0.3 Organic matter and root mass 0.3 - 1.0 SM Dark brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (loose, moist) with roots up to approximately 0.5 inch diameter scattered throughout (fill) 1.0 - 3.0 SM Brown silty fine to coarse sand with occasional gravel (loose to medium dense, moist) with roots and organics scattered throughout (fill) 3.0 - 5.0 SP -SM Gray to brown fine to medium sand with silt (medium dense, moist to wet) 5.0 - 16.0 ML Gray to brown silt to silt with fine sand, grading to gray silt (very stiff grading to hard, moist) with slickensides Test pit completed at 16.0 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 3.0 feet Minor caving observed between 3.0 and 5.0 feet Disturbed soil samples obtained at 2.0, 4.0, 9.5 and 14.5 feet 0.0 - 0.5 0.5 - 3.0 ML 3.0 - 5.5 SP 5.5 - 14.0 ML TEST PIT 6 Approximate ground surface elevation: 121 feet Sod and root mass Dark brown to gray silt with sand and occasional gravel (medium stiff, moist) (fill) Brown fine to medium sand with trace silt and gravel, occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) Gray to brown silt to silt with fine sand, grading to gray silt (very stiff grading to hard, moist) Test pit completed at 14.0 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 5.5 feet No caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 2.0, 3.5, 9.5 and 12.5 feet THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo -O Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE B -4 DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL LOG OF TEST PIT DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 7 Approximate ground surface elevation: 108 feet 0.0 - 0.5 Organic matter and root mass 0.5 - 2.0 ML Brown to gray silt with sand and gravel (medium stiff, moist to wet) with roots up to approximately 0.3 inch diameter scattered throughout (fill) 2.0 - 13.0 ML Brown silt to silt with fine sand, grading to gray silt (very stiff grading to hard, moist) Test pit completed at 13.0 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 2.0 feet Minor caving observed Disturbed soil sample obtained at 10.5 feet 0: • ,u u cow W 0: LL Q; W, O WW; 2 Di N! iQ �-- W W 0:1 Z is 0.0 - 0.3 0.3 - 1.0 1.0 - 9.5 9.5 - 12.5 12.5 - 15.5 ML TEST PIT 8 Approximate ground surface elevation: 126 feet Organic matter and root mass Mottled gray to brown silt with occasional sand and gravel (medium stiff, moist) (fill) SM /ML Gray to brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel and occasional cobbles to silt with occasional sand and gravel (medium dense /medium stiff, moist) (fill) SM Brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) ML Brown silt with trace of sand and gravel (very stiff, moist) Test pit completed at 15.5 feet on 01/11/90 due to practical refusal Minor ground water seepage observed at 3.0 feet Minor caving observed Disturbed soil samples obtained at 2.5, 11.0 and 15.0 feet THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo ,O Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE B -5 DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL LOG OF TEST PIT TEST PIT 9 DESCRIPTION Approximate ground surface elevation: 124 feet 0.0 - 0.3 Organic matter and root mass 0.3 - 1.5 SM Dark brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (loose, moist) 1.5 - 5.0 SM Gray to brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel and occasional cobbles (medium dense, moist) 5.0 - 11.0 ML Brown silt with trace of sand, grading to gray silt (very stiff, moist) Test pit completed at 11.0 feet on 01/11/90 Minor ground water seepage observed at 1.5 feet No caving observed Disturbed soil sample obtained at 6.0 feet THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. Geo . ,Engineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE B -6 • SUMMARY OF MOISTURE CONTENT Test Pit Number Depth of Sample (feet) • Soil Classification* Moisture Content ( %) 1 3.5 SP /SM 15.1 1 7.5 SP /SM 10.1 1 11.0 ML 16.0 1 13.0 ML 21.9 2 3.0 SM 17.9 2 7.0 SP 9.9 2 12.0 ML 23.0 3 5.0 ML 21.0 3 10.0 ML 22.1 • 4 4.0 ML 30.3 4 10.5 ML 30.0 4 13.5 ML 28.6 5 2.0 SM 40.4 5 4.0 SP /SM 17.5 5 9.5 ML 28.3 5 14.5 ML 25.3 6 3.5 SP 16.1 6 9.5 ML 21.7 6 12.5 ML 21.6 7 10.5 ML 20.7 8 2.5 ML 23.9 8 11.0 SM 16.6 8 15.0 ML 13.2 9 6.0 ML 15.2 efer to test pit logs for complete soil description. Geo �y Engineers '_1...._i::: .L.._a..wac�x� R. .u.:r'Y �..,- il�t.:v-- ,.w:•l: SUMMARY OF MOISTURE CONTENT FIGURE B -7 _,...su.rn •x..�� .l is a - ..:a.,. su3ak da^efiz::¢'t::e'Srlii2 t•,nx: Pj:,s'rf.aV v•. . .v• .�v e• .l.l -V V V V1 VV../ .' Geo ; Engineers MEMORANDUM Redmond TO: Dan Sterns 1 ESA Development FROM: Bo McFadden / GeoEngineers DATE: January 25, 1996 FILE: 4830-001-28 SUBJECT: Preliminary Geotechnical . Assessment ESA Development Project Tukwila, Washington INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents our preliminary conclusions regarding the proposed development of your property located in Tukwila, Washington. This. letter is in response: to your request for information to submit to the review board. We are completing our geotechnical report which will contain detailed recommendations for the project. Our report will be available February 2, 1996. The site is bounded by S. R. 18 to the south, 51st Avenue South to the west, Southcenter Boulevard to the north, and the gestar Commerce Center to the east. We previously provided geotechnical engineering services and a Phase 1 Environmental site asses:n:ent for the property. The results of our previous studies are presented in our report dtec; March 19. 1990. We have reviewed preliminary plans titled "Extended Stay Inn, Tukwila, Washington for Extended Stay America, Inc." (Sheets a -: though A -5) by LPN Arcnitecrure and Planning dated • November 13, 1995 and proposed detention pond layout by Warner Engineering which we received January 16, 1996. The detention pond will be located at the north end of the site above a slope. The detention pond will be at the northeast corner of the parking lot. Based on the elevations shown on the plans, we expect that the detention pond will be excavated to about Elevation 98 and will have sideslopes inclined at 311:1 V (horizontal to vertical). The top of the berm which will form the side of the detention pond above the adjacent slope will be at about Elevation 104 feet. As part of our current geotechnical study wz have completed test pits excavations in the area of the proposed detention pond. The test pits extended to between Elevation 95 and 98 feet. CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, it is feasible to locate and constrict the detention pond as proposed. Based on the test pits which were completed for our current study, we expect that the subsurface soil conditions in the area of the detention pond will include fill extending to about Elevation 98 feet. Glacially consolidated sediments consisting of dense silty sand and toad silt were encountered below the fill. REC5IVFD CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 081998 PERMIT CENTER 4 •• • MEMORANDUM to: January 25, 1996 Page 2 ESA Development Based on the presence of fill soil in the detention pond area, we recommend that the detention pond design include a liner to prevent seepage from adversely affecting the adjacent slope. A portion of the fill forming the detention pond sideslopes may need to be removed and replaced with structural fill to provide adequate stability of the slopes. We have also reviewed the preliminary drawings with regard to other geotechnical considerations. Tn our opinion, the design recommendations for the planned development will not be materially different from those presented in our previous report which were for a similar project. Based on our understanding of the proposed project we anticipate no significant gtot.echr ica constraints to developing the site as proposed. We trust this memorarldum meets your current n eds. ?:ease call if you have -iy question or need further information at this time. KATO& WARREN g `55MaWestern Avenue 555 Market Place One INCORPORATED Seattle, Washington 98121 MEMORANDUM Tel: 206/448 -4200 Fax: 206 / 728 -5608 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 2, 1996 Royce A. Berg,. __ Jim MacIsaac Extended Stay I )1 -- Estimated PM Peak Hour Traffic Distribution The proposed Extended Stay Inn is being planned as a place of overnight stay for business people. It will provide 90 overnight guest rooms; and it is hoped to capture a 70% overall annual occupancy factor. The project can best be described as a Business Hotel for purposes of traffic generation esti- mates. Trip generation estimates for a Business Hotel (Land Use 312) are found on pages 539 -548 of Trz'p Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers. It is cautioned that findings for a business hotel are based on a very small number of case studies. However, the findings appear to be reasonably appropriate, compared to slightly higher trip generation rates for the typical suburban Motel (Land Use 320). The Extended Stay Inn is estimated to generate trips at a rate of 7.27 vehi- cle trips per day per occupied room, and 0.62 trips per occupied room during the afternoon commuter peak hour. For 90 guest rooms averaging 70% occupancy, estimated annual average day trips would be 460 per day, and 40 trips during the PM peak hour. An estimated distribution of the 40 PM peak hour trips is shown on the attachment hereto. It is es- timated that some business guests will use the Inn as a hub for business trips in the four freeway directions. Others will use it as a base for local business visitations in the greater Southcenter area. Some PM peak hour trips will be associated with local eating and drinking establishments, and other support services in the Southcenter area. A few peak hour trips will be made by hotel employees, assumed to be mostly housed in the City of Tukwila. Kato & Warren, Inc. - 2/2/96 \jwtn\tukhote2.doc w; D! U�. 0 0: co co w, WX JH;. U) IL! w 0' gad: m• om: d; z c0.)0 O -; .O ;w w I. ~O, wui v —. 0. `. . • 571K A 1-EY i.TA' 4...•,...Zii ly 04 .". Mi 1 i- -rdit7 1- E-p-s7r-Fricv4-„,‘°- lit 5 Hit s ld v} Le) Ad ust Iry 0%-ii- °Nes, —I Mint Extended Stay Inn Estimated PM Peak Hour Traffic Distribution 01/24/97 11:34 FAX EXTENDED STAYAMERICA • )3•FFICIENC 1:l .i% -•••• Y STUDIOS January 21, 1997 Ed Rudolph City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Extended Stay America. Tukwila, WA Ed, Ii 001 JAN.2 4 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Per our 1/14/97 job site discussion with Greg Villanueva, Entranco and Kiewit Construction, you will I we Kiewit Construction remove the unsuitable material, gravel material, and miscellaneous debris Tuesdaj, 1/21/97 so that we may complete our work along 510 Street. ESA will be establishing our landscape bumi, directing water runoff toward the bridge as was the pre ious situation, but will not complete the WSDOT fencing tying into the bridge per the City of Tukwila's dire Von at this time. • As discussed, you will instruct your contractor to install temporary fencing as to prevent anyone/anytl ing from attempting to come down the embankment on to our property and indemnify ESA and Magnum Enterprises, Inc. of liabilities associated with such actions. • We will be bonding Magnum Enterprises, Inc. to complete the WSDOT fence installation, once the bridge bulk head has been installed approximateliArill1997. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Dan Sterns Director of Construction cc: Piero Bussani Michael Geiger Allen Wyttenbach Steven Platt • ■• Post-ir Fax Note 7671 0111M1FIMIMII TukwIlacom3spondencem5dotfenocclo4.1/14/97 -44•41446,...' 4 4. " t City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director �i -1/\ E1NAL PLANNING INSPECTION L95 -0063 — Extended Stay America Scheduled for: January 17, 1997 CHECKLIST Development Standards for Commercial/Mixed- UseZone(RCMU): 1. Setbacks: 20' front 5' side 0' rear 2. Landscaping: 10' front 10' side 10' rear Height: 3 stories35' Parking: 1 /1,000sf ( 5. _ Recreation Space; 200sf /dwelling' Project Design Review Issues: 1. Site Plan 1.1 • _ Enhance visual focus on.,„west,side,o £ srtealong 51st Avenue South --"... N • Assure sidewal pedestrian path connections on site and to adjoining parking area i • • ,.' Break up parking-with• landscaping • ✓Move parking stalls closer to building `~I•- •.....�( Provide pedestrian access to Southcenter Mall? L9( D kivl,hav Ped FL < .tt. 2. Building • ,-Provide a strong entry, modulated roofline, augmented treatment of windows, modulated and integrated with landscaping to properly conform to site and surrounding area, including color and materials. • _ Total number of units = ;total 96; 'from original 102 -unit • ,--'' Increase slope of roofline • Add windows to south facade • , ./ Modulate north and south facades • /Enhance entry to serve as focal point Expand recreational space . °j ` 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 h.w...u... .uu,.c, rte.. Planning Department Inspection Extended Stay America January 17, 1997 Page 2 Building cont'd... • Retaining wall material changed • _ Color (now Blue Green), materials, and surface texture selected to blend building with natural features of the site. • '�'� Add 12 additional parking spaces provided in adjacent lot 3. Landscaping • Augment landscape plan to establish a hierarchy from site to building to strengthen vistas and views, provide shade, break up visual mass, and provide walkways to facilitate pedestrian circulation, especially around building base. • _ Augment landscaping throughout - buffer along 51st Avenue South, on east and south side of site to facilitate pedestrian circulation within site, to recreational facility, and safely to parking. • Add planting along the city right -of -way (northwest edge of site) to increase buffer between hotel and residential area. • '-. Tree replacement: 12 trees removed, new trees to be replaced throughout. Five (5) trees on south of site and (3) trees at northwest corner to be preserved. 4 • _ Use landscaping to augment a hierarchy from site to building, to strengthen vistas and important views, provide shade, and break up visual mass. �.b. ' ' b. Lighting V ir;a • _ Add lighting to new. sidewalk, in off-site parking area, and along pathway from driveway entrance to main entry of building.- reducing impact on adjacent properties. • _ Augment lighting around entry • _ Light pole height not to exceed 20 foot maximum from grade 4. Miscellaneous Structures a. Signs • Number on site: propose 1 pole, 3 wall, 1 canopy plus directional; no temporary allowed after business opens. • %, Wall signs on east side of building relocated from roof and incorporated into the main entry canopy. Uzdtdrs aacc,e ..?ks V44ok Yto cLf leevv -00, 1,1u S ∎ - 6-cc - ,l !i ✓? hn�l( 1(l tY: w. iL' S' I: Yi. ivi <uAi�i:f�iJ.a:'.5�..�..•....n.. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor May 29, 1996 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Dan Sterns Extended Stay America 1611 116th Avenue Northeast Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: NOTICE OF DECISION (BAR) File Number: L95 -0063 Dear Mr. Sterns: This letter serves as notice to Extended Stay America that the proposal to build a 102 -unit extended stay hotel at. 15451 53rd Avenue South has been approved by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) as presented on March 28, 1996, with the condition to augment lighting in the off -site parking area along a designated pedestrian pathway to the main entrance to the hotel. The size, location, and overall design of proposed signs for the site have also been approved. However, approval of signs are subject to the approval of a sign permit, to be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Any changes to the specific design approved by BAR will require further BAR approval. Some minor, incidental changes may be administratively approved by the Director of Community Development. Any appeals to this project must be filed in writing to the City Clerks by 5:00, pm within ten calendar days after the date of the decision. If you should have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to write or call. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner cc: Royce Berg, LPN Architects 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 From: ban sterns 8106120059 maintained on the parking areas of the Property any inpsovrs,ent or structure. This restriction shall not apply to light towers, appurtenant electrical equipment, traffic or directional signs, or other similar structures. 4. Parkinn r✓a$�mc,nt .1P:•'_i�aDlc to Farcels . Declarant and all Future owners of Parcels 1., H, and C licensees. and employees shall have and their easiness invitees, ^• .) the parking Areas located on the right to use, true of charge, ;•y Parcels A, 13, and C as shown in Exhibit other. ��. _✓r�.� Th_ ~ S. P :rkinr, 1'asemcr h___.__''�.ie to r.I_cc>_ _ ,`` assigns, business invitees, 1 Declarant. its successors, ` licensees, and the ten :�. ^.tom of Parcel D and their. employees sna :i have the right to the c :C1uSi .e .;se of twelve / located in the north s t section of Parzol C and specifically / herein 1 and incorporated denominated an "exhibit . attached hereto � ``\ by this reference. As the conside::atior. for the casement granted \ b subsequent owner of ?once.. D, said 1 herein to the Declarant and /or s �' 1 Y of Parcel C the sum of ;140 :ji,T :DP.ED owner shall pay =o the owner o. PIFT1 DOLLARS (S250.00) per year towards the maintenance require - ments of Parcel C. ��- -�'"'� `��^_-,.,�.� "�, 6. Right -af: a•. Casement. its successors, assigns, business invitees, licensees, and employees shall have a r ignt- af-•way easement at all times in common with all owners of Parcels a, 11, C, and T=, over a strip of land forty (40) feet in with running across the southerly forty (40) feet of Parcels A and C and continuing across and through parcel b to the parking areas to be estab- lished thereon. Declarant, cc N N W' 10 W W0 2 = d; �- 0 Z !- VUt N, W W, Z' • Z_ ,m: Dan Sterns TO ROYCE BERG 1 Th Date: 2/26/26 Time: 17:07:38 23-4 w)!72 S' P6 / 30" 1-4 :.• • • 1 • • ••■2-3• r. 100 •b •• , .0 / 47 on 4, •/ // s... , • , , •a"`•• ••... .., ...,"1 / • v / ‘ ..id • 0.../ I... (1 . ..../ e st ...' a . 47 2G5 2 0 ••• •••••••• • D.• ! ; '•;" 1 ••••■ -•• 1.... " 1 2 I....-. A 1 .t• 4 • f •• 1 •• ;,,) : L•Z r! .1‘1 ; ...,..., I .:11...1".:..1 1-7; t-41•::.!:1,z1 :. ir,!...e c,-..... '• 1 TI l'• ••1 , .. .... ; i / • y ••• 0 1 .1'.. r■1 1 1.1 ' ••••• 42 ot: J.". • • • e 3 ; • . ' •-• I -5? cr, •-% • • • ▪ ) - r c . a • „ I e'r1 LA r 1 1.1Fr..1,1 urc: • 4 " Cd/............/40. 4 2 sit . ...4. ■••■■••••••■•. stj ie4. 7- c. -.4 0 i _.• 1 tn ..? ,,••• r.r) :\) • Z •L Fr 1 i (57.1 ' tr• I i tsi ; I 'f. e...4. 7%* ........., ...7". 14 ....-■ .3, CP 1.3 r• -. - ,,) Y.'. V- L. I t3 Ti CI 7: • E I ca t. 1 tt• c's s-N....i... 0 1) 1 1 1 ....4 4. Z' 1 o z • '..: ...:. - ▪ r3 ... ..‘a M 0 "" A• 2 1::" S 'la I . ■A 1 .a dr s• ▪ ................... • < ) a4 • E'.. C.) > I . .• •• , 11 •,.. .:7a •0:c.c: ;•.•O 8 7 10' ... ... . ?..,42.•-v•of'9.0...?, „i., AVE. h S. •".. C.3 Se....A. I-4 .4, • ■•, .7.!',: C: • ) ... 7'r'N a -,.._ . 1 E I v 't :7, ' N IZIk 1 r. : -4 i ci) t .1 x 19 . IC) C t....7 \C-4 :,..Z.-1 i I Tia:r • • V:.•,C0' :2 1 --.; .‘4 ... . 1,-••••• i: ..ii • • i •..„.f.1 A r 7.: • IS ‘•:. -7,. i I" * T4 1\4 rz CA °I,..?S' ‘ —1-N 1 : -";; I' :::::jr11. i Ili I ..31'.: .e4 ;!:14 1, ..-ti4 441/-f -5.: ; -: • 14:ti Uil" ... r‘..- .; r... 7,st . < . -, . 1 r 7-7 : -7 3 3 / 6 A 1 • .. • 4 _ f rnglr. Architecture and Planning, Inc • Royce A Berg Y Ken K ( him Principals 1201 I ourth Ave S Suite 102 Seattle WA 98134 (206) 583 8030 I ax (206) 583 0108 15 May 1996 Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: ESA Tukwila, Washington B.A.R. L95 -0063 Bldg. Permit B96 -0075 Dear Alexa, Per review of our files, we have not received a final copy of the B.A.R. approval and conditions. Could you please forward a copy? The original declaration of nonsignificance was dated 15 February 1996. The owner agreed to additional mitigation items relating to normal fees and increased trip generation fees subsequent to this date. Was a second D.N.S. issued or amended? Respectfully, oy•'A. Berg, AIA President RAB:scs VIA FAX: 206 -431 -3665 (1 page) cc: Dan Sterns, ESA RECEIVED MAY .1. 7 1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7\.\i'k, GM 1H PLANNING COMMISSION /BAR MINUTES MARCH 28, 1996 Mr. Marvin called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Members present were Commissioners Marvin, Malina, Livermore, Stetson, Neiss, and Meryhew. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Alexa Berlow, and Sylvia Schnug. There were no citizen's comments. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 25, 1996. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. With regard to the minutes of February 22, 1996, Mr. Marvin noted there was a typographical error on the bottom of page 2 which stated "Mr. Henry" and should have read "Mr. Marvin ". MR. MALINA MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 22,1996 AS 'AMENDED. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. L96 -0008: USA Baby Jack Pace presented the staff report. He noted the applicant is proposing to increase the size of their wall sign from approximately 64 sq. ft. to 89 sq. ft. The maximum allowed per the Sign Code would be 89.3 sq. ft. Staff recommends approval of the sign increase based on the following reasons: 1. The distance set back from the street. 2. The size of the sign fits with the shape of the building. 3. Other signs in the area have been increased per the Planning Commission. Steve Zamberlin, National Sign Corp., 1255 Westlake Ave., Seattle, Wa 98109: He stated the sign channel lettering, and the sign is U.L. approved. Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. • c:::.'c::ilSt:usis ,441•J - �•v..:�..,�..nF„,,. .:un..,a...... ..r..�..�...,...._ • �W` UO co0.. ' :NW w 0. J ILQ: N a z� z� LIJ DO ift H w W _..U; —0;. Ii•i z' co V - z S Planning Commission, -AR Minutes - 3/28/96 Page 2 MR. LIVERMORE MOVED TO APPROVE L96 -0008: USA BABY, BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. .s. L95 -0063: Extended Stay Inn Alexa Berlow presented the staff report. This project was delayed from February 22nd and has undergone numerous changes from then. This project was subject to the multi- family design guidelines. The number of units have been increased by 6 and the number of parking spaces have been increased by 12. The landscaping has been augmented. Easements for a shared parking lot have been obtained. There have been changes to the entrance. There have also been revisions to the design and lighting plan. 53rd Ave. S. is now the new entrance to the site. Mr. Livermore asked if the applicant pushed for the access change. Ms. Berlow stated she believed it to be a negotiation between the applicant and the Department of Public Works due to the 51st St. bridge alteration. She added that the entry has been redefined with a small courtyard in the front. In the revised design, the roofline has been modulated and the entryways have been reduced in scale. Twelve additional parking spaces are proposed in a separate, shared lot. Access to the lot would be from a walkway and the sidewalk. Mr. Livermore expressed his concern for the safety of the remote parking lot. Ms. Berlow stated the employees would be parking there. Mr. Livermore said there are not enough parking spaces on -site. There are 12 parking spaces off -site, 89 parking spaces on -site and 96 units. Ms. Berlow clarified that there are 102 units, but six of those are used for staff only therefore 96 units are rentable. She added that the applicant has submitted a lighting plan and a proposal for five signs. There is one pole sign, one wall sign /canopy and three directional signs. Mr. Neiss asked if impervious surface calculations would be required for this project per the Multi- Family Design Standards? Mr. Pace clarified that staff is only required to use the "Guidelines" and not the "Standards" in applying them to hotels /motels. ct w 0- N 0 w uji. J Nom', . w g J' LL Q N a I. � 1- o z�. o` ■o Why, H z: s: •:z • Planning Commission, ..AR Page 3 Minutes - 3/28/96 Royce Berg, LPN 1201 4th Ave S #102, Seattle, WA 98134 Mr. Berg clarified that the Department of Transportation would not allow access to this site from 51st Ave. Public Works decided there wasn't a need for a' sidewalk if it doesn't go anywhere. Approximately 4 -6 trees will be removed and replaced. There is 40% impervious surface. He noted there is existing lighting at the off -site parking lot from the adjacent commercial property. However, if the Board feels the lighting is inadequate, they will add lighting. Mr. Berg added that there are 96 rental units and 6 units for staff. Three employees will remain on site. Mr. Meryhew asked about the roof shingles. 00 co 0 NW= w0: Mr. Berg said it is a shingle which gives the appearance of a shake. N s. Mr. Livermore asked if they considered using an underground water detention system. w' Mr. Berg said they considered it, but it was expensive and contributes to the pervious z surface. w w Ua o Nt. ,o F- ;w w` o • zi. CU -. Mr. Berg said there would be and it is a requirement of the City. z A Develo P ment,1611116 Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004: Mr. rye said they have mostly business clientele and are roughly half the cost of the residence inns. The rooms are smaller, with a kitchenette. They are typically 70 -75% occupied. They close at approximately 7:00 p.m. There is no room service or restaurant. 10 -15% of their clients stay nightly, with rest staying on a weekly basis. They generate ,half of the traffic of a typical hotel. They usually have a rental car and drive to where they need to go. It is very rare that families would stay there. Mr. Marvin asked if semi - trucks would have adequate access to the property. Mr. Pace noted that the Fire Department didn't see a problem with fire truck access. Mr. Marvin asked if an irrigation system with moisture sensors is proposed. Mr. Meryhew asked if they offered a meeting room. Mr. Frsaid they did not. Ms. Stetson asked if they offered shuttle service to the airport. Mr.. rysad they do not due to the cost. Mr. Livermore asked if they had daily maid service. Planning Commission, AR Minutes - 3/28/96 Mr. Erfye said they offered maid service once a week. Page 4 Mr. Livermore asked how they would ensure that the trash is taken out properly. Mr. F, said their clients would keep the trash in their rooms and the staff police the area carefully. The rooms are checked every 2 -3 days. He continued by saying that he didn't think they would even have to use the off -site parking lot. ...w 6 JUG UO, U U: ' '(nLLI Ms. Berlow stated to the Board that the applicant cannot rely on other properties for .L F lighting. CO u. w O, 2 Mr. Livermore asked if there was the possibility of providing access to the remote lot. a D =v Ms. Berlow said that the location is fairly steep, and there is a bio -swale and detention F. al; pond. .;: z H O z t-: Dan Sterns, Construction Manager: 2 D Mr. Sterns said they can look into moving the remote parking lot or adding a walkway. v o'. They also do not have a problem with adding additional lighting to the off -site parking Az ` . Y P g g g P g 0E- lot. w W; U Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. O z: VU, The Planning Commissioners agreed to let staff work with the applicant to provide adequate lighting to the off -site employee parking lot or explore relocating the parking z lot. They also agreed that the lack of a sidewalk is not an issue. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L95 -0063: EXTENDED STAY INN, BASED UPON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS, AND THE CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT ENSURE ADEQUATE LIGHTING FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING IN THE COOPERATIVE PARKING AREA. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. During the Director's Report reviewed proposed changes to the Fire Station #53 project. The Planning Commission was agreeable to these changes. The Commissioners also agreed to hold a work session on HB 1724 on May 2nd and an open house on May 9th. Mr. Marvin adjourned the meeting. Prepared By, Sylvia Schnug tV4. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING, INC. ROYCE A. BERG, A.I.A., PRINCIPAL Y. KEN K. CHIN, PRINCIPAL 1201 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 102 SEATTLE, WA 98134 PHONE (206) 583 -8030 FAX (206) 583-0708 TRANSMITTAL To: Alexa Berlow City of Tukwila Planning Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: ESA Tukwila BAR L -95 -0063 SEPA E -95 -0034 Description: 7 Sets Revised Plans, dated 2/29/96 - Sheets A -1 - A -7, C -1, L -1, and ALTA Survey for Easements. PMT's to follow. Additional Colored Signing Reductions to follow. 1 Colored Site Plan and Elevation for Your Use and BAR Presentation to follow. Date: Project: ESA Tukwila Project No: 95024 Remarks: O Sent per Your Request • For Your Use /Reference O For Review /Comment O For Your Signature O For Your Approval O For Distribution O For Your Records O Other Via: O Mail O Courier O Hand Deliver O Overnight UPS O Hold for Pick Up By: Royce A. Berg cc: Dan Sterns, ESA Development CITY OP cv'ILA MAR 0 1 1996 PERMIT CENTER 29 February 1996 Mr. Ron Cameron City Engineer City of Tukwila . • • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard 'Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: • Extended Stay America Inn - Tukwila Transportation Mitigation Increase BAR L-95-0083 • ' SEPA E- 95.0034 Dear Ron, • Per review and conversation with Joanna Spencer, we have proportionally modified your original mitigation data as follows for the increase in trip generation per the base traffic study by IKCaro & Warren. Increase in units from 90 to 96. • 96 + 90h =1.067 % increase. 'Note: Proportionate share of additional trips are rounded up. Note: p.m. peak at CBD, added 10% for non - peak. • pig cente Pkwv. / Stranger increase to 2010 is 954 trips and•improvements cost is $134,000. The prorated share is $140/trip. 9:peak hour trips mitigation is $1,260. • Increase 9 peak hr. trips X 1.067. = 9.6. Use 10 peak hr. trips. `Increase 10% for CBD noon peak. Use 11 peak hr. trips @ $140 Southcenter Pkwy: / S. 168th St. increase to 2010 is 899 trips. ' and improvement cost is $250,000. The prorated share is $278/trip. 3 peak hour trips mitigation is $834. • Increase 3 peak hr. trips X 1.067 = 3.18. Use 4 peak hr. trips CI $278 VIA FAX: 206.431 -3665 • $ 1540 $1112 irnW�".).3bi:Sk�.tt'..:..' . 31:;:,{ d :+Y_',ii:•.l�.:U' +'rsF. ;t^..... n.t..',f'a:-a:.3:lwi:�:'':i i9 .i�at;n..h,' "ttd:.'�,rs'iJSkt: i.,uYL,•••:1'Sr, i '.J •d., '.F,Yd illd:PL. -4 )]r. �.LF �u�1 (.11. n::-i.• .5�'���j`•:,4�'u MAR 13 '96 12:03 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583 -0708 edonded StaY Amsrida Inn - Tukwila Mr.' Ron Cameron 29 Februry.• 1996 • Pege,Two•of Three Andover Park E. / Baker increase to 2010 is 663 trips and improvement cost is $250,000. The prorated share is $377/trip. 2 peak hour trips mitigation is $754. ' Increase 2' peak hr. trips X 1.067 = 2.12. Use 3 peak hr. trips © $377 Andover Perk E../ Sjrander increase to 2010 is 694 peak hour trips and improvement cost is $94,000. The prorated share is $135/trip. 6 peak.hour trips mitigation is $675. Increase 5 peak hr. trips X 1.067 = 5.33. Use 6 peak hr. trips. *Increase 10% for CBD noon peak. Use 7 peak hr. trips @ $135 Southcenter Pkwy. / Minkler •increase to 2010 is 907 peak hour trips and improvement cost is $122,903. The prorated share is $136/trip. 3 peak hour trips mitigation is $408. Increase 3 peak hr. trips X 1.067 = 3.2. Use 4 peak hr. trips @ $136 Andover Pk. W. / Minkler increase to 201015 1360 peak hour trips and improvement cost is $131,500. The prorated share is $89/tr':ip. 6 peak hour trips mitigation is 534. Increasie.6 peak hr. trips X 1.067 = 6.4. Use 7 peak hr. trips @ $89 * PM peak hours are used in the traffic study;•noon peaks are used for the CBD because they are typically 10% higher. The Southcenter Pkwy. / Strander and the Andover Pk. E. / Strander were increased by adding the 10% in.the above calculations. P.3 /8 $11 $ 623 LPN Architecture & Planning Inc:; Royce A. Berg; A.I,A.,1201 4th Ave. So., .Suite 102, Seattle, WA 98134 (208)583.8030 • .. .i'.f .•L.�s�GLAI- •_ U�. L `:'+dka.1�•v'Ziki.Ci;•f:tIrFU1i .Slfw::.'.:.�w+l. •44: }•'FYY� MAR 13 '96 12 :04 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583 -0708 P.4 /8 y Extended Stay America Inn ' Tukwila Mr. Ron Cameron ' '.29. February 1996• ; • !Sail Three of Three I. • The total traffic mitigations was $4,465. Revised total: $ 5-895 please call if you hate any questions. Sincerely, R. A. Berg, A.I. P f dent LPN Architects and Planners RAB:djp Joanna Spencer, City of Tukwila. Alexa Serlow,{ City of Tukwila Dan Stems, EISA Jim Maclsaaci Kato & Warren LPN Architecture & Planning Inc., Royce A. Berg, A.IA.,1201 4th Ave. So., Suite 102, Seattle, WA•98134 (208)5834030 .3_Vi` :luflA:iri1 ' J. vtLiiJuraxri: �i+, 4: ae✓ c. is" r:+ :.if:ct+.w:;:i�•N;a,:...Lr..�,' ^ FwdilfY .Sl:�:.- ;e::l6i�e5�.�dl,.5i'Si' Zia .:liii.NZJ�ia.{���,'e.•rva�..: •'1a: MAR 13 '96 12:04 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583 -0708 • To.: :. • : Sxtinded . Btiay , Ian ' SIPA Commeate 8'roau:: ' . Ron': Caineien; City Engineer ;Darts ;':." :'•'" Fe ruary` 10, 1996' • Subl ect i SEPA " WATER . P.5 /8 •A 10 . inch :sin' will complete looping the system along 51 Ave•S between 51 Ave 8 & Klickitat and 51 Ave S/S 144 St to serve these properties including Extended Stay. .•Mitigation•fbr•the additional water system demand is for Extended' Stay to' construct this piece (approximately 250 feet) along. part . of the Extended Stay frontage and be included with upgrading the existing system on site that will be relocated with the building construction. 'Easements will be•needed for the new waterline location. SEDER • :-.$3,679.26 LID asseosment for proportionate • fair ' share of the sewer construction; same-requirement pro'd-ed td-American Med Tech and other previous developers of this parcel. DRAINGAGE Drainage design details are being addressed with the Geo Engineers soils report that was received February 8, 1996. The drainage design and detention construction details will need to comply with Xing County SWM Design Manual standards and Geo Engineering report recommendations. Additional geotechuical:information may be required as additional design and construction information is developed. .TRAN$PQRTATIQN • Extended Stay affects. the following intersections based on ..'the peak : • . . • ''hour distribution * (received Feb 5) and proportionate • f. • • mitigations ! ' . j• :are: k12 SouthcenterpkWy /Strander increase to 2010 ie ' 954 trips ;: andimprovement coat is $134,000. The prorated share i' is$140 /trip: (9)peak hour trips mitgation ia $1,260. 1 1 I SouthcenterpkWy /8 168 St increase to 2010 is 699 trips and improvement cost is $250,000. The prorated share is $278 /trip. 3 peak hour tripe mitgation is $834. •, • ..: r(S =Y_�•r.risL'.s:iiurue ..1... 5`e� F Alittr'iiL7.tatag21.111i:. ` ^;L�.'):d;iid� " "•.'i:it` l:&.y':: �td enc.fn i�:.+ 13a4ib3'"G*vitalket.■ .Swt` .`_i�Md¢±+Iiii1 `» n'.``. eK-:< J:? I$ n':' i- '.5'u^k`S�'.ii�u:3x'faFi4U'. '•MAR 13 '96 12:05 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583 -0708 I '• P.6 /8 • • • 'Andover 'Park.•E /eaker. increase tie2010 . is• 663' trips•'and improvement' •coat ' i'4 $250', 000. •The prorated : share is $377 %trip. ' 2 • peak hour trips: mitgation , is• $754.. ". • Andover' 7P'ark E /Strander increase to 2010' L:s' • 694 �,;'peak ' hour trips and improvement cost.is• $94,000`. The prorated share is $135 /trip. 5 peak hour. trips:mitgatioa is $675 :.,. ; ; I • . SouthcenterPkWy /Minkler increase to 2010 . is 907. peak hour trips and improvement cost is $122,903. ;The. ,:' prorated share is $136 /trip. 3 peak hour tripe mi•tgation is 4408, . 'Andover :Pk 'W /Niakler increase to 2010 'ie.. 1360 +`peak •hour: . • trips and improvement cost is $121,500. The prorated share is $89 /trip. 6 peak hours trips mitgation•is $534. * PM peak hours are used in the traffic study, noon . peaks are used for the CBD because they are typically 10% higher. The SouthcenterPkWy /Strander 8 trips was increased to 9 and the AndoverPkE /Strander was increased to 6 by adding that 10% in the preceding calculations. The total traffic mitigations are $4,465: I Sidswal]R, curb, and gutter required by ordinance on 51 Ave S La to be foregone: 51 Ave S connects to the.8R518 freeway:to the west and Klickitat where there are no attractions for pedestrian traffic, there's high speed traffic,• and no foreseeable (20 or more years) pedestrian facilities planned, 51 Ave S to the north is narrow, !has abrupt edges along the east side, and has no attractions for pedestrian traffic, and extremely expensive street /pedestrian improvements are not foreseen in the next 20 years, so that'encouraging ped traffic :along the Extended Stay frontage would be a significant safety concern for their pedestrian traffic and other pedestrian traffic. .'eras' r1.• sLJ: w. .�.,.h.::`_tLf.:u,.;`::::iv6i`. :. CHITECTS (206)583 -0708 P.7/8 12 Febr,iie 1 986 ZFMey t limy slon w • glysif Tawnier ; • 6200 Souwconte ' Boulevard • Tukwila; WA :seise ,Extended itsy Attarica Inn - Tukwila 'BAR L- 9640063. • SEPA E 05-0034 • peer Akan, :Following is a list Of $EPA checklist items modified end added per review•with owner. Aided $EPA Checklist dams 13 Nov i§ Feb Of Revisions • ' .1. 'item 13-1-e d page 4 - Modify • Cuts to 8-12 teat. 2. Item • B�-c !� Gage 7 - Modify - N4 water will run into croak Water will tight line down private drive to 53rd Ave: S. to city storm drain after detention and bloflltratlort.. lMm•14 -a ! p 1.5 = Modify Site is seMced by'Southcsnter Blvd. and 53rd Ave. S. via a private road with access, egress, and utility easements already provided in private road for city utilities. Add Item 171- Water - A 10 inch msin.w111 be installed to complete looping the system along 51st Ave. 3. frontage and an upgrade of system on site wilt be paid and installed by developer. 5: Add ttem•181- iSewor - 43,679.26 Lip assessment for proportionate fair share of the sewer cOnsstructicrt will be paid by developer. Add item le -: Tranapartation - Traffic fees for trip gensrationrdistrtbutlon of 'ga i &LO ig hstd. by _ ase rear i'� nva. nn� n: _ . +it'i,€::a.a?:.�1�+,..i_i••: ••aii�vrLr: %.40..`4 dr= . i •mss loft IAA AID JJ ^'ti¢t�S• ��.Cf::itl`�e5ti.59 '"!`.: irt•.,,; j' .��'wu- Ph7I'•0 .,:,�dni:h:Yfr • • ;o O f. :N .IL;. 1;:i, W .0' W u.at W w:. ei Z1," Off= z.. po. .,I=, MAR 13 '96 12:06 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583 -0708 FEB 29 '96 iS ::S s. --'WiTE:.TS (2@E)Sa3 -07o3 12 Februay. 1995 Alen • • exdanded•St*y Aine$ca h'ur - Tukwila - SEPA • • Page Two.o/Two Add Item ?0 - Sidewalk - .sidewalk will be added down the private road for access ;a 63rd Ave. S. by developer. • Pre AI. • LPN Architects and Planners Matt Steens ; Construction Manager of Northwest Region ESA Development, 'Inc 1811 1.1eth Ave. NE, Suite 224 f!Illavue, WA 981)0443oe6 lop • Joanna Sagnosr, Ci f �of TukIlIa • OS 'LPN An:Minn t* & Planning, !het., Rot's A. Sera, AJ.A., 1201 4th Ave. Ss., Stilts 102, Seattle, WA 68134 (209).583.4030 . ,_._,.ki Wes. dig. K: 4........ �.. 5., i. c)..:` F.._:.°, ,:�a'L.'irT1:�t:.::sJ.:::c•.r.? s;... _ _ , .r., c;n;,;I.:.r % \l�'�1 S iii.:: Litt" ELF: �=' �: 1�i45�Y• '4litit ?:•= �= .1.11�7.;:.ldri.A� x . 5; vr�i `.1wt5ie'tw.•,::A:y,Y7�iibst�: GS vw vs\l'itT City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Plaimirig Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing on`' )j , 1* at 7:00 p.m. located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC EE4R NG CASE NUMBER: L S - U 3 APPLICANT: j2..oy �€, A-. REQUEST: 30, o0o s. F. 14-are-t_. 10z o N iTS LOCATION: 15 51 5 31240 Alis Scrt.T1 -4 (So vrti- ( W-e 13w0 + thol stg Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property . Owners, File. I, A F F I D A V I T Notice of Public Hearing LI Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Packet Board of Packet OPlanning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: Determination of Non - significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other to each of the following addresses on l, (P_ ► s 3/! sl 4 , Name of Project Signature File Number (' C5D V› A F F I D A V I T O F D I S T R I B U T I O N �y L� A C AVJA -E14 hereby declare that: Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Packet O Board of Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet ['Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit O Determination of Non - significance fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice O Other, 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on 3-Z-0 - -I to Name of Project TMbeiy INI\.1 Signature - n1cr/ File Numbeie:..: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PUBLIC NOTICE City of Tukwila Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on March 28, 1996, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING L96 -0008 USA Baby, Steve Zamberlin Approval to increase wall size from 64.5 sq. ft. to 89 sq. ft. per TMC 19.32.140(A). 17720 Southcenter Pkwy., Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ;.L95 -0063 Extended Sta y Inn .: Royce Berg, LPN Architects Design approval of a 30,000 sq. ft. hotel with 102 units. 1545153 Ave. S., Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times March 15, 1996 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 f15.7Z0- 0012-01. SOLLY BRUCE W +NANCY J 8901.S 180TH : ST KENT WA 115720-0015 -08 BOWEN LEROY 7311'VIEW"LN SW .SEATTLE WA ',115720- 0020-01 BOWEN LEROY. ..7311. VIEW IN SW SEATTLE WA 115720- 0030 -09 SEAFIRST BANK REIS .LINGER 06620211 PO 80X. 34029 SEATTLE WA. 115720- 0035-04 PIGOTT MORRIE .CAPITAL.INVESTMENT 6695 KIMBALL DR VA GIG HARBOR WA GROUP Its 369999 98032 3N1072 98136 3N1072• 98136 301600 98124 . 343033 98335 •;r•rr•rY•rrrrr'a`TrM•�•Mrr•. r`TT r•rrrr•rr-rr•rTrrrr•1 115720- 000 • AERO— S....E PORT INTERNATION549999 512 STRANGER BLVD TUKWILA. WA 98188 115720-0019 -04 SOLLY BRUCE-W S NANCY.J • 361192 8009 S 180TH ST 0104 . KENT WA 115720- 0021 -00 CHENEY DELBERT J 15005 51ST AVE S SEATTLE WA •98032 98188 115720-0033 -06 . JANKELSON 'REAL PROP INVEST 4D0992 12222 PACIFIC AVE S . TACOMA WA 98499 • 115720- 0044-03 T C L INVESTORS • PO BOX 68219 SEATTLE WA 222304 - 9019 =03 KRUEGER' FRED N 15241915T AVE S SEATTLE WA 099999 98188 C0480 98188 222304-9019 -03 icfc ;ca'c* ;c ,c*sc* *,: ,c)c ,c,c ;c ;c4.>i , ** ,c>t**;t*ac**ic ****************************A"" ***************I************.***** * ** *** :c ,<,c* ;c******** ***** **ac*** >;c . ril'.:; 'r�i��i.:••y34e��Ya;.••..'� "'•. t`::t��: S �:L`..L'e\:tu:i{i'Jv:i7 ur'. kL kyei�:mrw.sx•i xecza.s�7irMtr� i��aY�yYfdFl�lina�+w.,— City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM February 27, 1996 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jack Pace, Senior Planner RE: Further Postponement of Extended Stay Inn BAR At the request of the applicant, additional modifications to the Extended Stay Inn hotel were proposed on Tuesday, February 27, 1996. These changes will necessitate revisions to site and building design submitted to DCD February 26th for Board review on March 7, 1996. This change will also require additional SEPA negotiations with DCD and Public Works that must be approved prior to the completion of a staff report to the Board. Therefore, please be advised that the Extended Stay Inn Design Review meeting scheduled for Thursday. March 7. 1996 has been canceled. Design review for this project has been rescheduled for the regular March 28, 1996 Design Review meeting. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development PUBLIC NOTICE City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission will be holding a work session at 6:00 p.m. and the Board of Architectural Review and Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on February 22,1996, in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING I. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: II. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L96 -0005: STAR'S Children's Wear, Inc. Ron Wittenberg Approval to increase wall sign area from 150 s.f. to 183.6 s.f. per TMC 19.32.140(A). 17550 Southcenter Pkwy., Tukwila. L96 -0003: Eagle Hardware & Garden, Inc. Paul Morris Approval to increase number of internal information signs from 4 to 7 per TMC 19.22.101. 101 Andover Park East, Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING III. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: IV. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L92 -0050: Northwest Expo Center Stuart McLeod Modify the approved "unique sign" of the Northwest Exposition Center by removing the "Gateway to Tukwila" portion. I-405, east of West Valley Highway, Tukwila. L95 -0063: Extended Stay Inn Royce Berg, LPN Architects Design approval of a 90 -unit motel. 1545153 Ave. S., Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Distribution: Seattle Times February 9,1996 Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 .t ..A.: ;';a::s∎:.i- _ Al.:;. . :y: ... A:.. - CL c won, 9 W; w 0' w D WW Vi, z` L. col O' z. BOARD OF ARCF"T,ECTURAL REVIEW DESIG..1EVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Construction of a three story hotel-- - approximately 29,172 sq. ft. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 15451 53rd Avenue South Parcel #115720 -0031 & 0041 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: LPN Architects / Royce A. Berg Address: 1201 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 102, Seattle, WA Phone: 206- 583 -8030 98134 Signature: Date: 111 15/ 95 * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: ESA Development, Inc. Raymond Frey, Vice President, Real Estate Northwest Region Address: 1075 Bellevue Way N.E., Suite 117, Bellevue, WA 98004 OWNER Phone: I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that 1/we are the o er in this application and that the 2 6 .-35 -9,265 VP. /2-Girt- contract purchaser(s) of the property involved ego:rtg statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: RECEIVED GI i Y {a>" TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTER oUAhU ur ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLI "7ION CRITERIA r : Page 2 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, • attach additional response to this forth.. . 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. gg B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual .0 N o o� impact of large paved areas. , 07 w: III C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. w o RESPONSE: 2 u =I' . • Building is centrally located on flatter portions of the site to preserve �. perimeter landscaping and afford pedestrian access to building. = d, I- w • Parking areas are dispersed around building for ease of access ? and allocation of parking. z o:. • Apparent height of building is reduced by setting building below m a 51st Avenue South. Scale is further reduced and character added o cal o —. with pitched roofs and stair modulation to break up facade and 0 F-; identify entry points. = w FO; 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA Cu Z A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. o .____ &._ _Appropriate landscape transition to.adjoining properties should,be provided.... _, _ __._... z._,... C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent With the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular dreulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: .: t . • “"^ • Patterns of windows, railings, overhangs and exposed stairs create interest and break up building mass. • Landscape transition between existing properties are similar in character. Existing significant perimeter landscape buffers are preserved along the north and the off -site existing freeway landscape buffers the southern areas • Facility relates to existing adjacent facilities through use of sloped roofs and residential scale elements. • Site circulation is limited to existing east cul de sac with no access to 51st Avenue South DuMriU yr Artl:1-1I T ECTURAL RCvIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC'.ION Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to.beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: • Substantial existing perimeter sloped areas have been preserved leaving a natural mature background when viewing the project from adjacent and distant vantage points • Access points to building and parking areas have been reduced in slope as much as possible to facilitate on site access to units • Landscaping will highlight entry points and buffer units • Trash and recycle enclosures are on north side and enclosed - -- service is on the west side and buffered from 51st Avenue by grade differential and new landscaping. • Lighting is integrated with the structure for control and security. 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. mow: o O! ;w • W: J CO LC iu ua _ v, E--W z F..' UJ Do ON ;w W` o; o •. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: • • Building is proportioned and balanced with window patterns, door patterns -- -eaves and dominant stair and roof modulation. Color are varying and highlight architectural features to provide visual variety. • Mechanical equipment is integrated in architectural character. Satellite dish is on grade and buffered with landscaping. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: • Entry plaza occurs at east side of building with informal outside seating under entry portal. Ia.. w 2; 6V 00: W 111 U w' w o gm' u. Q. d: W z`, z o' tu Dpi to W` — Oi z; H F O z i"- 61 4 •O O J 102 W Floodlight Ordering Information Appticat(ons Warrior otfdrS a Vatlet) of lamp and mounting I•ptict,ti in both IPS and ntcts3 hc,lid*. These combine w12l') water - tight constrt:ctian Itru adjustable light cuteft to make Warrior por t,ct for marines, storage: cenico arees, parking Ict:. and 35ght Industrial areas. Catalog Number Logic Lama Tl'p • 70 -400 WATT ' '4PS, M.!i Dimensions •■ „ •••• 1)• alaloo 1 13• .1 %arn, Product Family liounLns Lamp Olitr:�1t14r: Yrr• Wrttagenfaae r.P =HFS • Mrszhie: w :1 VJP =W3:r,u, E5_C.C5 70 =701'O . u: 150 =15.0 VM:wl 115= 175s1yMO ;er 43O:4O V,M :;.1 (r:; :ie 2E').. 1 f:'i . hi!:f.l: rn:. ..'. T•} I'd c..tii }J'a: CEE ca;Et ! 1; i!1 Ea: f: :" E _.. Catalog' Humber 44.rWP•65S 7C Hr?,VR•65S• 150 HPWR•65S•250 403 r.P.ti•R•555•4:.r, ri14tv9•65S'. Mr,W ?•05S• 5!' Mri1VR•65S•Z0;+ Lamp' 7yp• IIPS WPS SPS HPS STS HP; Mr. Lamp e3allaat Wa:tag• Typo 700 150 250 17: 250 4Cr, ,Cqy ?::i ^•C' :!J1S ;:1rv�.9 ?' 11el: ;a3!,1".:x!...; ail i2 :2:B.'i4C*; .1 M•t.li:1:'•; e••.;r2dICI 1 :•V • $1a•ltJ ::l •.1ii., .'i.y:.'.ISt No Options (add as suffls) FER :tEW, PhC!3C ;l ;i ricc2utr•c!: F :Si''Ste:Vie ! 2C ••' 217! i22Dout'e fu;,_ :236 ;4O :u :311 C223 =3 u' •2•3ce: crcw'r�.', ? :20I:4.::.:r!:a...:: C2_2 :i' 6 LU M ARK lecnason•s (order seperatetrl EPA 13 1.3 1 2 • 13 ;3 Het. Wt. (Lat.( 7_ 35 25 Voltage 259 :2C' V I' • 243=240 277=27i 'en Si:::C• .: c; ..: 3'1 112 :i;i13i? •2:'•.t 7J1'J I c'a1G:C =P-•o!:cte:Inc:orir:• 120 •:v'. ;■ot r,%! 1C1;r= Pro :oeloclrlc zor.r.!. 105.2 35 +: I; 1'ii4':i. i e 0A!∎327'PociceletineCOriro; ' :1•;' i +EMA :•,L'� ?3• I20.6;,ttor. v4.1econtrol !2(.0:. S :;r' ; :tr F6.2 :9i ':,.51:i;c.r1 pro: :o_0:.._ ■ 2 c:2.1. tl::' 1ir. ;;Ilv PS•2'7 ='2LS;':•' :l:ol ::z . IV :•f'!:i! ;n'1• SZt Sr•0 :;.- TV.1V42. . ^p WC:AA/F. zv%fge 9u'a :•t VCIPAR:1:311c3i'.'i 0 FA.5r2* i :• :fl : :et Ire 1:l'r'l: :n llti L• %? R.46:f :9,1• J•. ;.. :L•: c'•r' ;ri"; DECEIVED r; " "Y OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 ?i;;i CENTER oEs ca!el ION Tr.: cad Sale VR !I' Sci.ien: co.slt),:•erc ,:rrch.lee.nr•r: wr: or'or;iv vsr.q ter."1:1u :r(,no A r., ;,:ct.yrOiy .3rtyerl ,....:1• rail :rsi.::',Irne:s att.ril ly iiir.reon the eibi■ity of thr: lii v. OA' ci W.C•WS and trbsOrt1 Impa....1 EA:I/1114:k iojecurrn on:11.1ed oniycarbonate Ot)tiCal Oei■rdel 01:0. ni.;:;L'ort; the la(fl) ilJr0a■:e. !Grit evenly. tiltee C.S A. certtlini./ fOr v4.:11neafiOnS. APPLiCATION Tne Or:rab le, versatile 3'' Scit.Are ECIEW is Perfect for use in carr.dOrS. ClOrrnito: rust teems, rapIC trarma vairGni;. loading (100.5 and mr:r.r•u1) set:uray infaitLitiooS C I' I (h..i 1 rSa ji A Lens' r..1.;:■*.r111:e,;:r.t• r-'r. '1::fr.111 Mri /•d• • tniel. All ...gin 1..“ t•o: atr! '1 5•I'FI ri.;rioci.ny (Lit ut.) elea.1.:••;.; B Fasteners TORX with clitio re.•Ar.seo :r.to lent; le ref..e.iance Fa!•"erter.i rapt:ye in the 'a-.s orio seile‘.! hy weeis 0! a nt:core, C Reffector 15 co. CAS .,:••.,tc• 043'1 reflectance oolvette, fgrviCer coat finitrh :,••••—••••„, o SCE ;,• ...I" 4" the 1.:ci;„,rec.: fi•a. • t fo: E iirnp 03! t..:;t:•X"., F Soc$iet vulyea.00nate.. Oeniealetl 10 CO tfeCI !Z::)1.1 wo:Tas.c. rxdce:ai.1 vett% rt.C■Ne: •:Atv..1 Ornr.. Tc:Ev; G GaSket One ro.ece :loYeC rric.i.;nting ga4eefs enwe H • 1r:1 FIC"r• clectrorra... uzllest; are some lario,r„ : r r.g r'f FAIL-SAFE' • ,n1,..4!....":.•;::.•• • _ • : . EC 9" SQUARE `0-'"Ctf.;•"; 0 '.**. • • 14 , • •,, • RN 9" SQUARE 0 0 E F Et W - 1 W F.'woret;cer • 7 S W 1,Car.jer.Cir.I 114/INIMINLIES POLYCARSONAYE 9" SQUARE LUMINAIRE Clear Prismatic or White SIPE PITAEPISLPIYP... SCE Casting MOUNTING DI MENSIONS ..• 02;•■enC,tc, :3.••t C Vandal Resistant Luminaire ENEAGY :cr • •.,:••■ • • •••.::s..° ;i:Cr•JI.:JI •• • . ocr•cr•.1.1:•4.1 'r s:••••• • •••■ ••;• . . •■•••. • : • 1 r,v.r.rrnir• •••;., • •.• 4.—. i LW COOPER LIGHTING RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTER T•Pf. 0ESCa1PTION The roeGra..v.i'dision Concourse III iS the n1CSt versatile, (stictionaliy designed, .rniversally adaptable outdoor lig'':t,r,q available. Through . variety of mounting styles, it offers a family of low profile snare• cutoff luminaires that make optimum use of today's high output r;lO sources. APPLICATION Enhancing natural landscapes as well as cityscapes, the Concourse HI brings outstanding performance and style to walkways, parking lots, roadways, loading docks, building areas, hied any security lighting application. U.L. listed for wet locations. CSA certified. A c 0 E G DIMENSIONS eH :AI,OQ o SPECI.. A ?•G :J etAI :IASS A LatctIes Two Sprir,Ij•Ste;.i noir",c rrt, ?as+e latches cn housing for rc :r,!!ass entry. 13 Socket Porcelain mogul•base Screw shall typo Tamp soct.et v:ith sprinp•Iaaded center comae :. C•- •Housing One•Diece, die-east atu"'sinurr•, housing features aesthct,catly pleasing soft - corner design. D•••Gaskettng Closed cell gas•fillcd higr temperature silicone g.. ;k ?tir, , completely SC•als optical tysthm from dirt. bugs or other foreign material. E•• Lens Thermal shock of 0 :rrtnac :• resistant cIsa; ter )P..tee g'SSS. MCGRAW ED1SON: % O1' _ 1 One•r.•iece ttyrr o car :r.. d a,r'C'.•lec1 aI',ntlnufT refle•Ct.rs arovae five differ° ^t �t�r :ct•' clstr,rjUt'LnS a'C .',etc, i. IGfr control, C•.Mouhtinq 1ttiv£tsa1 metmtiny elernp _GnCealed :n hCu•3; 1g lift 1 112" to 2 31E' 0.C. heri:entll tenoi13 ,vithcut aJapters. Provids s vertical leveling BJI�St :71en ;• H 83Ilesr Easily rernovi,Jle nigh powar factor hill) Mufti-Tap Cal.iast is I Hinges Integral hinges preve:lt doer rocking anc ee &ft1*'0 1ptbi1:tit.•5. / • •\ 1 LI :i i j'tll1 "•. , A r Ili I r I L._.: � 1 i '1 >'' tL 1 J Ie'J I) - 14 .e• I • SPIDER /YOKE MOUNTS CSCONCOURSE HI 7 0• d 0 0 W High Pressure Sodium ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHT ErrERGv DATA H :•Reanance E,•tl.rt 1npur Hans t0V4 II1'S •Ir•r 55 V:.ttsl tOCW PP, 4j •? • 1St, ISOW I41. 4471. t'SO Weatt CK•I Laast: Input wan% :SOVY 1-.FS hG• ::3VU waGa CAA 3.tu.1 r,w -I vans :aver hi.'S HFd :453 'Az:It. I; . i :- i RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTS,°; COOPER LICIiYING wcci OO ' N UJ; t W O. g Ql CO D of WW• F • Z U —; Z . 3 4 140T0METRICS andlepowet 0ittritution . ( 1 :I . ' ? j ..;:t-- I I 1 ;. I i 1 I 5 4 3 t 0 1 2 3 a' S Teet No. 766691 ODEC•2EN.120V Lamp. 22W CF Lutiltt.-u =14N GRDERING INFORMATION Spr.t►LE NtJMSER• Q0EC•t6N•120V Footeandie Table _ Se:eet mount•ns AC•;...1 e. :1 r ::a .•..• :.51 ln: tee:: i•I.3• vv,.e< 41 CACn .Srj eer1),V, ::.r•: . .. - -.. Mounllnf Heiat,l Fo2teenwo Values Ior EGO 1seto.lc►nJ1e, Line+ 5S 71■, 0.31 vlc L ^v3 32? 1C• 1.Cs3_ 05: 07_ C 07.7_ 1�. 004 ,.__•` i,14 aL_^i•Gt Lamp Type Product Fancily Print Configuration Waetsre 1 I I 1 i J 1 7 •• Tube 5 turttina4ts {PP -Pe, :•retc• Pain: I 7.7;•: Fr.Creuleot ' EC4CIe3r Pnenait 10p1:o-.21. 5 :at. •r. 5•E'.'i ' C04044b Tubt 1 Lent 1 S:an.:er0; 1 16,114 FI437! {:ant El+•WMIt 16.t3W t DD-20 , i 21•21•,1' ' Ftue•4$sant .1 Lens ;22.22'4 I I4dMa•ldeieer1 1 27- ta121•V 3$42.:1 I 75.79W Catalog Palm �r t Lamp Numb., C_onfpm411cn _ W•n►ge TTEC77N•120V None 7 TTEC•51..120V NON 1 9 QDEC•10A•120V Nowt lit ODEC 27N•129V Nene 28 3.'7EC•27M•120V None 28 GOEC•27A•120Y None 20 COEC•7$N0127V Nene 76 DDEC•16A•12OV y Nere L' DOEC.31 A.120V Norm 21 1TEWPP.7N•120V Perimeter 7 'TFWPP•5N•170V Penmeter 9 00Ew.P9•184.12CV Perimeter 15 DOEWP4•27N•110V Perimeter 26 DDEW.P .27H•123V Perimettr 23 ODEW.►P•77A•12e6' Pe4tnetft 26 O DEw.PP.2lN•170V Ftrime:er 26 0275w•1P.111A•170v P•rtrneter 16 Eillrst V411024 0ptiono :.e04/990tie; . I I �.`.o ^+`:. i 'ti ": 1 F1.5::•;!* F.143 j °5.126'1 .P.cWCer +'it' e.er1 (..: 1+' ::•_ :rj. Intl.: :_ P +' ?71•.Cr:O:ae:! :!.•' j ::c:t: i FF. A.•e:•P :e•Jt 1 5CE.S.ela :. Conc.i•: gar •I.r..^2,1 I'CN �! '�.V'rtir�•tl:: (. 1 CC•F-Car•een•::.•t rl..:le: ..•t i SetOe i nSi4Fc.p.`. $., str 14-Gf.C1. ...•C' 11 • Me•unGn; nS0•V•A S:rewo.r :rer 1 ;0. >II Lens jt!.11,e veSe.v•R Scre•..•i.e• E•; 1 lee as Lent 5.rei.r. N01. A .•ej1••4. NI e•00•4':.14a•4'•:* 10, .40.1.4,30,0,C+1 ;.ee,e Cyn..c 1M.o , Lamp - ;T:eit Enet9y data Net Wt. V41umS Irv. �_ _?•p• Itn0ut Vist:.sl Ilbe•! ^ lev. R.1 Tw•n Tltb• :.:Fe 12 0 7 5 043 Two': Tube NFF •20 75 0.43 Cual Tute E :eel.: .'c 21.5 7 5 o 43 1:11'. +r'Sea0 Tu0c N41 34.0 7 5 0.41 17113•' 643 rube I4PF 3: G 13113,% t:u)31'.._e 64:1•9:%.1' 28.0 Cu•d !vt.e \ff 930 20 Pluor:scs•l Ftedrote 15.5 :0 f. luoreg,tem £rec•,an,C 21.5 Twin T .bc - -------- NP r' -- 17 0 7.5 Tw.n Tcbe NPF 12.0 7 5 -.--- Crad Tt,L•e E•yt:ror.:.' 21 0 7.5 ( .13W Cu -4 1tD ':P: :Jt,C T 5 _ 12134 OnJt1 Tv_C ^!Pi _ -, 34 b 7 121)1 a Coat: T.•D^ .:c'to.l••___- 23 0 7 55 Ou.CTubt •:P: 230 76 _ 75 043 7.5 043 75 043 75 043 • 75 043 C.43 e.t1 0d3 041 043 0 43 0,63 cS .31 2v F'.:a:crtcn: _-•-- F,re :ay e 5 OGEWPP 2M.120V Pfilrnetcr 31 F..:rrg;: r: _ f +,t:a_+c Ct 5 INE17.PP•75 ;170' Ptr•eletrr 75 13.10e arlC, 4N: -- !::� _:a +6 S., =m r•ratr.....•.: o• RM....., l.:l ;Crj /0• •nM1••U' 33•I•••• ..00.01 ..,t 51.46.'41,;(...4 .na 0• +•r: 0,• . .,.4113 Inin• ...nwnl •ware Pe •...••et wept. ...•.1.:1 401 ..nn .nu.•J•,•N: ant 14.e•.U•q 4••a :•111.0.4 5.1...I :04••,3 a (.....1:64 C.••pa;I il..n•.. :na Jn. j Ca•...1 IJC.C•. 13• e' ••..l{ c.AHfU•"+rm: C ?•'' .•. 77v...•l34 r.e. ,N 314: 11.6•e1G4•1 I.np. 4113 4.113411. 311 WV./ 4^•0 I'W •'••• nl. :N :ni' l31lr. O COOPER 7_5 75 CITY CI 17 OF rF l{Vili) , NOV 2 0 PERMIT 31: ,J 7,4:13_ TYPE oESCpiPTiON The Fait•Sure VR 20CC Decorative Series. combines strength•gaining architecture with elergy-saving technolOgy. Architecturally angled facers with radius corners actually increase the ability of the lens to deflect blows and absOrb • .mpact. Extra thick injection melded polycarbonate lens incorporates an optical design that obSCures the lamp image and spreads light evenly. U.L. listed and C.S.A. certified for wet Iccations. APPLICATION Tne durable, versatile Decorative 0C-VE/DW-VE is perfect for use in corridors, dermitories. public rest rooms, rapic transit stations, 10.3Ding docks and minimum security iristituttOM. CATALOG( SUCIlCM .,ON fEATUA.ES A Len; One piece injection molded UV stabilized polycarbonate, 0.130 thick All light control Prisrt1S & bie.ndels are on tne inside surface of the reducing dirt build-up and making cleaning easier. Et •Facteners Two stainless steel TORX4 Screws with center reject pin. Screw heals tire recessed into lens tO maximize tamper. resittance. Fasteners are captive in the lens and sealed by means of a neoprene 0•ring. C. Mounting 16 ga. CRS mounting plete with white high reflectance polyester powder coat finish, 1-6-a I .) t- \--) o SCZ.) Housing tOpticna: Accessory) Four 1/4" fafiteneIS trtaxitIluin vandal C.:J51 tour 1:2- z;n:ries £ Lamp (Ey ()triers) F -Socket PotycarbOrl4tel Dedicated to cOrreet Isrrp wl'ilagO. !flc3i,.clescent pO(C:1:4in rriec..:,..rrt base with nickel- plated brass screw shell. G Gasket One piece die•cut closed cult EPb'1 mounting oesket seats entire lens l'iDvsing. H • Ballast t;luoreseent. Only) Coaper.wounri tyPF balast standard. HPF magnetic or eiectronic ballasts are available witn some lamps, FAIL-SAFE' • SIDE DIMENSIONS SCO Caning 159,1rAl 1 7:e' (.4Ernmi cGOPER LIGHTING z‘ MOUNTING DIMENSIONS 6 litilur t- :167.van 1 3 VC 193rhmi I 1 r---1 ---1Z• 't ■—•—• • 5 )•e' • 12467,m1 11419,•• Pen:n1. 4,100,1tr.,2 f•lo!e3, 13 1/1S• • 1332mmj tis ••• 10-1x • 4 : •ep•vcrto :1 :C•3•04 .^C DC-VE DW-VE DECORATIVE 7 W - 2 8 W Fluorescent 6 0 W Incandescent 1111111111=11•11M POLYCARSONATE DECORATIVE LUMINAIRE Clear Prismatic or White with Vertical Eyelid Vandal Resistant Luminaire it As vifp • f°(.1 11)o ENERGY DATA 3.1analerNmt :cte.ed technn:p. 0:1: to u.0p0r1 trm porfar-r,1,c% of refer to Mc orierin; AlOte".at.oft i•tJt RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTER A:4 -10TOME TRIOS n die 0 V4 er Distribution i •99• ••••• ••••••••—••—__ I • 47. 7 • 7 • / • I !/. ! Jr I 0 • I \ ! ! L ! —1 rne C0 E • I i/ ! . - , I 543710123 4 5 Test No. 768655 CIDOC-PP.28N•120V Lampz28W Compact Fluorescent LuIrtriS.16000 ORDERING INFORmAT;ON FOottandle labia •- St:00 mounoi.1; re zd eves!, 1::1T.e.lcan./..! /4 Of CJV, Ar•dle 1.^e — 2.1ountitic mewl F04101414 Valdes for DC09•1 isoleoteandle I.Rhe 5 1 79 0 99 0 )6 0 18 0 05 0 04 100 0 SO 02r' 010 0'» 3 02 10. 064 037 0.12 00 )C2 0 01 OC•VE,D0i•Vt 'JECCAL!',..( SAMPLE NUMBER: CDDC•VE.1814•120V Lernp Type Product Fatuity 1 ridTwril isti [Decorative Se!!1•1 flue:es:am OCaCIew Preariat;c 0.0•Quat Tope 1 len: Fivoreszen: ,D1V.Werrra 111•Incandteeen1 I Felscarleenal• %AM Print Configuration VE VEvvenicsI Eyelid le19.9t StoncrfJ) Wattage, tellact Voltage 0060 r.s A 499090 tees -- i 120V • a 1.7W N*,.:114: 1-17:7; 9.511:4 pos.4.: • 2:7■," ,e.tew • 1Cita 22.92.VIV 1.19414)11 Pow,' 219.29W faseor' 50.88w AvE;ectior,,c' I F1 • t.-Lome RP.Rdc.9re41 cdesl,vmerr. .PraMOC,..11 1.6.27:ne•Pngt[ICtil %et. SCS•SailbCe ClIn20% COL COt;OCCeirettieMe meanung Scre..4r•eet lor all Lens tem VASC.V•R serc.or,er an • for all ;tog sm.,: •1,99.... 9..•919 La M:9.94 99.90.• a• .1141.11.8,•■16.1. Oat/ —Tiririn . a- Net )Nt. ..- . Cateies Lamp Confkruretion Warta°, fiumbee Type TT. 'Input Wanst tifF Verkal Eyelid rIDC•VE.7N.170V 7 1...In lutre 12 0 0 lir ven.c3I Eyelid 9 1v,4 Tito 5:911, 12.0 I4419.0:.% 9 '9 17pcNE.spi.120v •rt;: f v4:1■13 ! I C.C.vE ..12,.120v v.;a! 13 OO c ,r T: t _ 17 9 e DC•VE•IEA•120v' Ver !aEvnl1 is o30 rvr., ettn.4 se 2G.5 4 0 000C.VE .22N • 120%• Vt1...,4! Evirt:a 22 EN If:Co,t....c' 770 4,0 0:9 OnDC•vE.25A•t2Ov: Venlcal fee.%3 26 04430 Tutri 09434 'Nee 2.7.0 4 ') 0.29 000C.vc.:SN.120v vel,:st Evelie ”. ......_____ ...,pf._ 3.1 9 a ,r) r--- --- 0 )9 Verusal Evert! crov.77 i0 PArrr. t.,%.,e • :0: . Acrod.vi .6:.120v NA 3) Sr 4 ( 0:2 !!,:,,!.f.,:.!•:;:•: I P101•1 Ord ...darae:semirs 0, Iserrnalteceoes ,c0 see Ito, si asts!!te 430 4:•9109:41.90111.0 sa9cfl ..14t 1,1, as '0.3,4! 0;•111....e.d. 1.1.4••:•41 40991 ifig.,,e0 1.4. 04.1...4. F!.....:44eN •am, Ct, 0..!1.1tt5 ,4 0 :114. it le• !!•st‘A: :1•e1.44 ,-c tale, 1;4,w i.e., 5•.13•41 COOPER Cooper 14:)trno RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA • NOV 2 0 1995 FERMITQFATER crrizes:.: *F rs. s :1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: . The State Environmental. Policy Act (SEPA), chapter.43.21C RCW, requires all governmental .. agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. • An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be Lu oc prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the 6=D quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide _1 o: information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal N o; (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and ' will to.help the agency•decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: - w o` This environmental checklist asks you .to describe some basic information iL a' about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the N d environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- w'. tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- .4.' mation known, or give the best description you can. 1- o; z i—; 11.1 ut You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your 2 o C knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from o NE your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. o i-; If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to Au w:. your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers x a to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. 9- p' z; Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- " line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If o 1-' you have problems, the City staff can assist you. z The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period cf time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. RECEIVED CI'T'Y OF TUKWILA NOV 2 1 1995 PERMIT CENTER Contr + ?lo. Epic File No. Fee SritC'.to Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST — A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: EXTENDED STAY INN` 2. Name of applicant: LPN Architects /Royce A. Berg 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:206 -583 -8030 4. Date checklist prepared: 13 November 1995' 98131 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Spring 1996 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Nn 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No -2- z w U1: UO: CO 0 Nw w O; g ri _. z� O z ;. 2 ui 0 H w V; • z' U 5' O 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Tukwila buildin. permit boundar line ad'ustment and Board of Architectural Review 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. ' There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 3-story. hotel - -- _approximately 30,000sq.ft.,_96 units 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your. proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Location is in Tukwila, bordered by Southcenter Blvd. to the north, 51st Ave. So. and" DtJT-right -o -way for Highway 518 to the west and soJfT, oster's Furniture and an offire_park exist tnthP PaSt.,_ 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Scope bank to north and Gilliam Creek to north are classified as environmentally e is Eve. -3- z 00 0 0; co W; W Z: n F-:. W 0; a'`; co X- a 1; W. Z 2 E- 0 ! Z i--: uj U 0; 0 NS yid wz OH: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAivi' Evaluation for Agency Use Only ▪ ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • Earth a. General des ri.tion of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is ,the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ?8pprox. 65% on the north position of site c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any .prime farmland. Sand with variable silt and gravel over glacially consolidated silt d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No recent_PvidpnrP of er sign e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No nPw fi]yrequirPd, grading will_req.ui.re cuts. of be required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion js possible until landscaping is installed g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if.any: Erosion control and siltation fence during construction per city standards and new landscaping after construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Auto, truck and equipment during rnnstructinn - -- none being significant. Auto rxnissions after__ construction b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During earthwork activity, dust control measures will be implemented. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. _ Creek area exists to north alQ .g. Ssa eater Blvd - -- Type II water course per -5- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over,' in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No - -- Construction is beyond set back area and : buffer for creek - -- storm drainage may ultimately tie into cheek after filtration per city standards. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- Evaluation for .Agency Use Only U O w o :. W Q om; — d: z! O Z 0�`. 10 N;. D H' ,= "I-V lt. Pn • z: O b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and . approximate quan- tities, if known. No • 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Proposed system to run into creek after detention and bi of i l trati on per city standards -7- Evaluation for Agency Use Only LIU Lr6 21 'U O Cps CO W CO w = t 10 1-1 uW Z! ui ;, O F'� 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Potential impacts to be insjnifican . Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: XX deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other XX evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs XX grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 12 to 14 significant trees will be removed. Grasses and weeds will be removed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known -8- Evaluation for Agency Use Only o Cr • 0! Ww J F' uj o u. < in s' • uJ z� o. z 1-: mo• o, o Nk .. CI wW u. Z` U Et' O Z.; • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if anyudmiscapin.g wi 11 be Nor , st natj.y Plan - '. . .1�,_eMPrgrPPn . Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on.or near the site. None La2dL c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:Addition of new treel_and _Rnesery tip of_ significant trees and buffers almg_ilope bank -9- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood,. stove, solor) will be used_ .to. meet the completed project's'energy needs? Describe whether it 'will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. .Natural gas for heat. Electric for power, heat pumps and lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building would be designed to meet state energy code requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A -10- Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic along Highway 518 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise from 7:OOam to 6:OOpm _ Auto and traffic after construction 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mufflers on construction vehicles Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently a vacantl of b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No knowledge past agricultural use c. Describe any structures on the site. None 4 -- Evaluation for Agency Use Only re J Vi 0 O; CO G 9I co W o; J. LL <.. I O Z F-; W W 'CO N = W F-0v i! Z' 0 z d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C-2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site ?jegional retail business g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Type II watercourse at north end of site. Development will be outside_required buffer of 35 feet. 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 67 -90 Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project will be in compiance with all applicable codes and ordinances Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing?. None • b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Norse c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Height is approximatply 28 feet withAl.eet_ta the sloped ridge - -- bight aMPraga a tPet a}_slnpPd_ roof . What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None existing trees higher than proposed structure c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping ground areas will break uo building mass. Color and architectural massing and detailing provide visual relief and patterns --- limed roof provides visual interest from distant viita,s. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal lighting at parking area b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare' may affect your proposal? Street lighting will not have a negative effect d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Light fixtures will be directed down to parking and walkways. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only z OCwwc QQ is J V ,0o;. ta W 0 2 Q; d; pw:. z4 w w: �0 a.. 'W w —o; z: U (A'. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- .. posed for, national, state, or'local preservation registers known.to.be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ' No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Southcenter Blvd accessed through private existing road. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what • is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit stops occur on Southcenter Blvd to east of I -5 c. How many parking spaces would the •completed project • have? How many would the project eliminate? Project would provide approximatg] 97 parking stalls None would be eliminated Evaluation for Agency Use Only g JV;. oo o, W W, . J Wo g J` Iw 1— 0' z ut 0 co 0- 0 I- WW H V LLH'. z U CO; o' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when -peak volumes would occur. Approximately 458 trips a day would be generated per • I.T.E. tri. •eneration manual usin business hotel g. use---90 units with 75% occupancy---(trip generation is actually believed to be less than above). P.M. peak is projected at 39 trips. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Shuttles and public transportation 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If • so, generally describe. Increased need is not expected and facility will provide service b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Design factors should minimize impacts public services, i.e. uTly sprinklered buildings with 24 hour monitoring. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • - - 16. Utilities a. Circl- ilitie urrently atural . gas) ary. .sewer able at the site: refuse service, ic . system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities are available at the site Signature The above answers are my knowledge. I un relying on them to m Signature: Date Submitted: true and complete to the best . of sta tat the lead agency is its fj c ion. • /4) 4(44Vn PLEASE: CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- Evaluation for Agency Use Only PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 22,1996 (Approved 3/28/96) Mr. Marvin opened the work session at 6:10 p.m. Members present were Commissioners Marvin, Meryhew, Neiss, Livermore, Malina. Ms. Stetson was excused. Representing the staff were Steve Lancaster, Jack Pace, John Jimerson and Sylvia Schnug. Mr. Lancaster started out by informing the Commission of a recent issue with the South Lot Development project. The proposed parking would violate the buffer requirements for the stream. The minimum buffer requirements.is fifteen feet. The buffer can be reduced to ten feet administratively by the DCD Director. The applicant would then have to build a retaining wall on the edge of the stream. Mr. Lancaster recommended another solution, which would be to try and retain the existing vegetation, which would eliminate some of the parking spaces. The Commission agreed with Mr. Lancaster's recommendation because the applicant has ample parking. Jack Pace provided a briefing to the Commission regarding House Bill 1724. He reviewed the process, how the Bill impacts the City, and the joint meeting between the Council, Commission, and Board of Adjustment. Mr. Marvin closed the work session and opened the public hearing. Mr. Marvin stated that he didn't believe the Planning Commission had enough time to review the Extended Stay Inn's staff report and materials since they received the • documents just one day in advance. Mr. Neiss stated he never received the packet at all. MR. NEISS MOVED TO RESCHEDULE THE EXTENDED STAY PROJECT TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. There was no second to the motion. Mr. Meryhew stated they should probably schedule a special meeting for the applicant rather than make them wait one month. Planning Commission Minutes February 22, 1996 Page 2 MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO MOVE THE BAR ITEM, L95 -0063 TO THE BEGINNING OF THE AGENDA, AHEAD OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. The Commission then asked for citizen comments regarding the Extended Stay Inn project. Raymond Frye, 2030 92 Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004: He noted he was representing ESA, and he just wanted clarification on the process. Mr. Pace indicated they would not have to make their presentation this evening. The project would be continued in two weeks at a special meeting. Mr. Marvin closed the BAR public hearing. Mr. Marvin opened the Planning Commission public hearing. L96 -0005: Star's Children's Wear: John Jimerson presented the staff report. Mr. Jimerson noted a correction to the staff report. The increase was actually to 194 sq. ft., which is a 44 sq. ft. increase. The Tukwila Sign Code allows an increase in the sign area when the building is setback more than twice the minimum zoning setback. In this case it is more than 101/2 times the minimum 20 foot setback. The sign would consist of channel lettering and interior illuminated can lettering. It's consistent with other signs in the area Staff recommends the Planning Commission grant the 44 sq. ft. increase in sign area. Ron Wittenberg, CSI Electrical Advertising, 12832 NE 14 Pl., Bellevue, WA 98005 Mr. Wittenberg added that the layout of the sign has changed. The side -by -side wording has been changed to having the word, "Stars" on top. Mr. Jimerson noted for the record, that staff believes the revised sign orientation to be acceptable as long as everything else still meets the Sign Ordinance. Staffs recommendation still stands. There were no citizen comments. Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L96 -0005: STAR'S CHILDREN'S WEAR BASED UPON STAFFS FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. xi4+ 4' F;' s�,C SilAifil�.'LiY�(2wi+'iNf.' \'dr Y7.11¢'w':+lri:L/.tWw Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 February 22, 1996 L96 -0003: Eagle Hardware and Garden: John Jimerson presented the staff report. He noted the applicant is requesting to increase the quantity and size of the internal informational signs. The Code allows four internal information signs which cannot exceed six square feet. To expand that, it has to come before the Planning Commission. The applicant is asking for seven signs. The proposed entrance and delivery signs are proposed to be 15 square feet each. A seventh sign does not provide direct information, it separates the vehicular oriented use from the pedestrian use. Staff is recommending that the sign be changed so that each of the letters is reduced by four inches. That would reduce the sign by approximately 18 -19 square feet. There is no logo on the sign, no reference to the company name, a limited use of colors and the sign meets the intent of the Code. Mr. Malina said he would like to see the last exit sign enhanced by having it say "Receiving Exit ". Mr. Meryhew noted the customer wouldn't see that sign as they are leaving. Mr. Malina stated he was concerned with the blind corner coming out of this exit. Paul Morris, 981 Powell Av SW, Renton, WA 98055: Mr. Morris said the company concurred with the conclusions and recommendations made by staff. He added that they will control the exiting out of that door with a gate. Mr. Livermore suggested that the applicant place "Caution" signs on the interior of the lumberyard. Mr. Malina stated for the record that his son works for the Eagle Hardware Corporation and Mr. Livermore stated that he owns stock in Eagle. Neither the applicant or audience members objected to them deciding on this project. Both Mr. Livermore and Mr. Malina didn't feel their affiliations would bias their decision - making. There were no citizen comments. Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. MR. LIVERMORE MOVED TO APPROVE L96 -0003: EAGLE HARDWARE, TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SIGNS FOR INTERNAL INFORMATION WITH STAFF' S CONDITION THAT THE LARGE SIZE LETTERING BE REDUCED FROM 28 INCHES TO 24 INCHES. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Ht 5fi,:'w. bSY. :C� N:h:f 'Y tl uV 7 iL ir.Y}5 +xiEai'a:'fw.iikay.ti,V Planning Commission Minutes February 22, 1996 L92 -0050: Northwest Expo Center: Page 4 John Jimerson presented the staff report. The proposal is to modify a previously approved sign. The sign was originally approved in 1993. The site is long and narrow, with the building located approximately in the middle of the site. The sign was approved as a "unique" sign, with a condition that "Gateway to Tukwila" also be placed on the sign. The applicant is now concerned with the clutter of the sign and is asking to revise the sign by having "Gateway to Tukwila" removed from the sign. Staff agrees with the request because as you enter the City from the east, that portion of the sign is not visible. Also, as one is leaving the City, that portion of the sign is visible, but they would be entering Renton, not Tukwila. More importantly, the Code does not provide decision criteria to require this be added. Therefore, staff recommends the proposal be approved as submitted. Don Miles, P.O. Box 40143, Bellevue, WA: He stated he has been involved in the design of the project since 1989. The sign is in final design and now they are able to determine how visible the sign will be. Mr. Marvin closed the public hearing. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L92 -0050: NORTHWEST EXPO CENTER SIGN REVISION AS SUBMITTED. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. U o' w J F. N LL` W o 2 ag -J J W a _ :dE H W; .:z�. 0 E- W.W • •H U U � ,o z Mr. Marvin adjourned the meeting. Prepared By, Sylvia Schnug v- .n��ir�:ii::w.,.. ... �r :.�d�;:....r�.M.�,�r;i�::�+.4�; dirf;7:.S:,:.i; «;�:n;ar� ...... .....,�«<;w•, EXTENDED STAY AMERICA BAR REVIEW - POSTPONED UNTIL 3/7/96 OUTSTANDING ITEMS 1. BAR review application • DATE(S) REQUESTED 2/13 2. SITE PLANNING a. detention pond design (kcswdm) b. sidewalk/pedestrian path connections 1. on site 2. to adjoining areas 2/13 c. visual focal points 1. entry 2. west side of site along 51st Avenue S. 12/18, 2/13 3. BUILDING DESIGN a. modulations 12/18,2/13 1. roof line 2. north and south facades 4. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT a. landscape buffer along 51st Ave. S. 12/18,2/13 b. addition of landscaping and structural elements 1. to strengthen connections between public and private spaces for pedestrian and vehicular circulation. 12/18,2/13 5. MISCELLANEOUS a. exterior lighting plan with day & night illustratives b. sign code requirements 12/11, 12/18, 2,13 2/13 'tii.Ywifa { • } t r, 1)11, 1ur Ind 'Ir inr iinc { In( • n lip•r'1 A n I;"l /1v' 5 .`�iiil II( • WAYKI-ii1 (2H))',8 .iH(l.i(' I 1.l2Uhl'�r'�iil;rit'. 28 February 1996 Alexa Berlow Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Extended Stay America Inn - Tukwila BAR L -95 -0063 SEPA E -95 -0034 VIA FAX: 206 -431 -3665 Dear Alexa, Per our phone conversation yesterday and your review with Jack Pace, if ESA wants to add the additional 13 ft. to the building and six (6) units, they will have to have all plans in by this Friday, including revised agreements with Public Works for trip generation increases, if any, to reviseSEPA. ESA has decided this is necessary to make the project economically viable to cover increased development costs with drainage and architectural requirements required by the multi- family guideline. LPN has been directed to proceed on this schedule. Hearing will be delayed to normal BAR schedule which is 21 or 28 March. Please confirm. LPN will coordinate issues on traffic direct with Public Works and modify plans for submittal by Friday. Please note plans will not change substantially and review items or comments you still have on plans submitted this Monday can be incorporated in these new plans. Please call if there are any additional requirements. R= "•ectfully, Roy . Ber A.I.A. President LPN Architects and Planners cc: Jack Pace, Planning Department Ron Cameron, Public Works Joanna Spencer, Public Works Dan Sterns, ESA Ray Frey, ESA RECIENED FEB 2 9 1996 COMMUNi Y DEVELOPMENT xwa. w. ca. w. a:.. e... ,_:;�...;:.,�..n�:,�.arn:.:�,x. aa.w v.:; •- :� e' ' Weaffe prl 27 February 1996 Mr. Jack Pace Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 VIA FAX: 2064314665 1`1 4(AG Cutite,) RE: Extended Stay America Inn - Tukwila BAR L-95-0063 SEPA E-95-0034 ,Dear Jack, Per the scheduled BAR meeting 22 Feb 96, we were told a postponed meeting was in two weeks, and 14 Mar 96 was the date referenced. Per review with Alexa's notes, she has the 7th of March scheduled. My phone call to you and Sylvia yesterday could not confirm either date. Please advise which is the correct date. Per our meeting with Alexa and the owner last Friday, numerous revisions were made to the plans again to further meet the multi-family guidelines for review. Seven (7)' sets of revised plans were resubmitted yesterday afternoon. Subsequent review by the owner of cost impacts of added features to this facility require adding rentable units to building for a total of 96 units plus six (6) administration. This adds 13 feet to the length of the building; note:: this still fits on same site plan. We need to review this revision with you and your staff today if pos6ible. Please call if you have any questions. IVAi Ro - rg I.A. President LPN Architects and Planners IRAS:dip cc: Dan Stems Ray Frey rim uklik vietsmo cak tAi;vi lem-1 RECEIVED FEB 27 1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 802.0-E6S(902) S1031IHONU N81 OP:80 96, 22 133A 1- 0; WARNER ENGINEERING 5122 Olympic Dr, NW Suite B204 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 22 February 1996 LPN Architecture & Planning 1201 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98134 Re: ESA Tukwila - BAR Staff Report. Dear Royce, Civil Engineering & Planning Office (206) 858.8577 Fax (2C6) 658.8579 File No.: 017003 TA-tit B: I have reviewed the City's comments regarding the existin _ slopes on the site and find that the are inconsistent with the topography of the site. The orth si • - • f the site has slopes and even a small area adjacent to the creek where the slope ' 200° o. This is slightly higher than stated in the report. The J' of the site has slopes u to lo. The east side is not addressed at all in the report. The maximum slope in the is 32% as opposed to the 73% stated in the report. The report mentions a 40% slope to the west No portion of this site slopes to the west. The . mrr t, of the site generally slopes from 13% to 29% not the 45% stated in the report. Please let me know if you need any additional information on this issue. Sincerely, Coin 't od,L• Carol M. Modjeski, P.E. Project Engineer 5UDPES.8AM i7 ec) City of Tukwila Department of Community Development HEARING DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: ACREAGE: John W. Rants, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared February 16 -20, 1996 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: STAFF: February 22, 1996 EXTENDED STAY INN AMERICA SEPA - E95 -0034 Design Review Royce A. Berg, A.I.A. LPN Architects 1201 Fourth Avenue South Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98134 To construct a 30,000 square foot 3 -story hotel consisting of 96 units. Steve Lancaster, Director 15451 53rd Avenue South (at Southcenter Boulevard and Highway 518) Approximately 2.01 acres Residential Commercial Mixed -Use RCM - Regional Commercial Mixed -Use Determination of Non - Significance (DNS)issued on 2/15/96 Alexa Berlow 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 2 ATTACHMENTS: A. Site Plan, Drainage, and Parking B. Exterior elevations, Entry treatment C. Site. Section- Looking North and Entry treatment D. Site Section - Looking West and Grading E. Landscape Plan F. Civil Plan G. Title #96007 H. Floor Plan (1st Floor) I. Lighting Plan J. Mitigated Sidewalk K. Lighting Design Specifications L. Signs - Site Plan M. Signs - Elevations N. Signs - Elevations 0. Signs Size P. Signs - Size Q. Signs - Size R. Signs - Color and Size. Specs S. Signs - Color and Size Specs T. Signs - Color and Size Specs U. Color Board* V. " Base Stucco Finish* To be presented at hearing. • BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 3 VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION A. Surrounding Land Uses The site is bordered by Southcenter Boulevard to the north and Highway 518 to the south. Foster's furniture and other small retail businesses border the east side of the site and west of the site are single family residences. B. Existing Development The site is vacant. It is hilly and slopes from a high of 65% on the north side to 45% and 40% on the south and west sides, with the exception of the far southeast corner of the site which drops at a slope of 73 %. A creek currently exists on the north side of the site (along Southcenter Boulevard). It is identified by the city as a Type II watercourse. The current proposal would grade the site between 8 -12 feet. C. Vegetation The site is currently covered with deciduous and evergreen trees, grass, and fruit bushes. Songbirds have been observed near the site. The proposal would remove 12 -14 trees along with grass and weeds. New trees will be added and significant trees and buffer vegetation will be preserved along the slope bank only. D. Project Description The applicant proposes to construct a 30,000 square foot 3- story hotel consisting of 96 units and including a 97 -stall parking lot, landscaping, drainage pond and biofiltration swale, 10" water main, 8' sidewalk, and recreational amenities. BACKGROUND Project History This Proposal has undergone several informal reviews between Planning and Public Works staff, the project architect, and local contractors. Delays during the SEPA process (determination required before BAR review) and inconsistent design revision submittals has delayed the staff report in order to present a clear document of findings and to outline, for the Board, outstanding issues of concern that will need to be addressed. These issues are discussed throughout the staff report where appropriate to the multi - family design review guidelines. BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 4 SEPA Determination A Determination of non - significance was granted to the project. Concerns for safety along 51st Avenue South drove a decision by the City Engineer to not require the construction of a sidewalk along 51st Avenue South. The lack of attractions for pedestrian traffic, high speed automobile traffic from Highway 518, and no foreseeable (20 years or more) pedestrian facilities planned due to estimated high costs for improvements supported this decision. In lieu of a sidewalk along 51st Avenue, a sidewalk connecting the site and 53rd Avenue South, along the east side of the site and main entry point, was recommended. DECISION CRITERIA Design approval by the Board of Architectural Review is required and should be reviewed in coordination with the guidelines, codes, and permits discussed below. Board of Architectural Review This project is subject to BAR review as required under TMC 18.26.070 for commercial structures 5,000 square feet or larger in the Residential Commercial Mixed -Use (RCMU) zone. Multi- family review guidelines are applicable as provided by TMC 18.60.055. Residential Commercial Mixed - Use(RCMU) The Residential Commercial Mixed -Use zone is intended to provide for areas characterized by commercial services, offices, lodges, entertainment, and retail activities with associated warehousing, and accessory light industrial uses, along a transportation corridor and intended for high intensity regional uses. The zone standards are intended to promote attractive development, an open and pleasant street appearance, and compatibility with adjacent residential areas. The proposed hotel meets RCMU basic development standards for lot area per unit, setbacks from property lines, height, landscaping, recreational space. All parking will remain on site. Multi - Family Design Guidelines The new zoning code for the City of Tukwila (adopted December 4, 1995) stipulates that the Board of Architectural Review shall use the multi - family review guideline section in its decision making on hotels and motels (See Tukwila Municipal Code 18.60.053 -55). This project is also subject to Board review as a multi - family development under TMC 18.60.030(2)(b). Due to the length of both criteria, the attached BAR review guidelines for multi - family (TMC 18.60.053) as a reference to design criteria. re 2 U0: ww CO IL W O: g :*1 = 0; O?. ww, U 0 I — r. • co,. O Z FINDINGS (1) Site Planning BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 5 (a) Site planning, building design, landscape /site treatment, and miscellaneous structures are identified as key features of an overall multi - family design plan and are therefore intended to be reviewed together as a site planning system. The proposed development of the site is at odds with the existing topographic features of the site. The site slopes from the northwest to the southeast, yet drainage is proposed to be piped to the northeast corner. The City Engineer approved a detention pond and bioswale modification to the original proposal to direct drainage to the south (refer to comments in SEPA file E -95- 0034). (b) The proposal would remove 12 -14 trees along with grass and weeds. Some new trees will be added and buffer vegetation will be preserved along the slope bank only Located on the east side the site. (See items 3b -d for discussion of proposed landscaping.) (c) Some provisions have been made to use landscaping and building shapes in a manner that facilitates pedestrian circulation. The Parks and Recreation Director advised that a picnic bench appropriately located would offset employee and guest demands on local recreational facilities and be an advantage for the site. It could be incorporated into the natural features of the site. (d) There has been concern about the lack of ways in which the entry facade and building orientation do not take full advantage of the site's views. Following several informal review and negotiation periods between the architect and planning staff, the proposed plans have been changed to provide a stronger entry: The building entry portal now relates to the entry and the building behind as well; the office window and entry are no longer hidden behind the structural pile as was proposed in early phases of this plan; and, an entry plaza with coordinated landscaping now works to create a more defined entrance to the site and building. As per SEPA determination comments, a sidewalk will be constructed along the south side of the driveway entry to the site. The sidewalk is the only pedestrian pathway that links the site to surrounding land uses. (e) Vehicular entry points and interior circulation design are contained within the site and are clear of possible intersection with nearby streets. (f) Landscaping treatment is planned for the entire perimeter of the site. Focal areas include the northeast and southeast corners of the site, where site geography is heavily sloped. (g) Addressed in items (2) (a -e). • Sli:iiie'€ >i, 1.:.• e&::..; iix) 4.: ai,J.iSF1fLrr4114-'✓i4:44 tY+ iii;" w�. 23i;;. le[ GdnE�ius3. 4'Y:wc:G(w'.4:n'..'<,x...aavu.. u:-u..i.�lu:n s«......w..u.....,. ..._.._._.. . BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 6 (h) Parking does not include features that interrupt or reduce the visual impact of large paved areas. There are no service areas proposed on this site. (i) See following item (2) (a -e). (2) Building Design (a) See item (e). (b) See item (e). (c) See item (e). (d) The proposed color scheme succeeds in minimizing the building's prominence. It also succeeds in helping to blend the structure into the natural environment through the application of different shades of beige and green. (e) The hotel proposal meets basic development standards for multi - family design. However, there has been question as to whether the proposed site design succeeds in meeting the intent of the multi - family development policy, specifically in relation to measures to reduce "monotonous design in single or multiple building projects." (3) Landscape and Site Treatment (a -b) The proposed landscape plan will incorporate existing features of the natural landscape, particularly on the east side of the site. (c -d) The proposal currently allocates over 75% of surface space to parking. Landscape or structural treatments have not been provided to help separate public from private spaces, strengthen vistas and important views, provide shade, nor to break up visual mass. Instead, walkways remain adjacent to the building as primary pathways to guest rooms and to parking along the periphery of the building. (4) Miscellaneous Structures (a) Seating at the entry of the building and a picnic bench at the south end of the site are designed as an integral part of the site plan. Materials are compatible with building scale and color scheme. (b) Trash and recycling receptacles have been appropriately screened. (c) N /A. Mechanical equipment will not be used on the site. D U O' W= F-! WO g a1 cg zpw i. :z LIJ 2 Di ID O g2 Wl!J`. F V€ LL H z; O r�. BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 7 (d) An exterior lighting site plan and lighting design specifications have been submitted. However, illustrative guidelines showing the impact of glare on adjacent land uses has not been submitted. Current site plans do not demonstrate their function as an integral part of building architecture. (e) Hotels are allowed one sign per side (four (4) total). This hotel's classification as a highway business also allows one free- standing sign and one temporary sign, for a total of six (6) signs per site. The applicant proposes to install eight (8) signs: five (5) building signs, two (2) free - standing signs and one (1) temporary sign. Sign Code guidelines were reviewed with the applicant. However, changes were not incorporated into the plans and specifications submitted for review by the Board. CONCLUSIONS Site Planning: Design and maintenance of the detention pond and bioswale will need to comply with the King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. Final approval by the Department of Public Works will be necessary. High quality focal points are lacking in the overall plan, i.e., sidewalk and connections to small commercial developments east of the site, and augmenting planting along the west end of the site. Building Design: Several informal reviews were held to discuss the proposed design with the architect and contractor to modify the building design. It was agreed that revisions would include lowering the height of awnings at the front entrance and modulating the roofline, particularly on the north and south sides of the building, as measures to reduce the impact of the building's bulk and scale. Revisions only met modifications to the entry (as exhibited in section drawings). Revisions to the roofline were not submitted by the agreed -upon deadline (February 15th). Landscape and Site Treatment: The west side of the site could be augmented to create a stronger buffer between the hotel and adjacent single family structures, particularly since the decision not to require the construction of a sidewalk along 51st Avenue South. BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 8 Landscaping and structural elements could be added to help strengthen pedestrian circulation and create links between private and public spaces. Miscellaneous Structures: Despite several requests by planning staff for day and night -time illustrative plans showing the impact of glare on surrounding land uses, no materials have been submitted to sufficiently evaluate exterior lighting standards. The proposed signage does not meet Sign Code requirements. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed project with conditions. If . the Board wishes to review the revisions, they should say so in their motion, otherwise the revisions will be subject to approval by the DCD Director. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Building Mass and Scale The following revisions will need to be made: a. Modification of roofline as a measure to reduce building bulk and better integrate the architectural design into the character and scale of the surrounding area. b. Modification of north and south facades by lowering awnings or pediment features to the same or comparable level as revised entry. 2. Landscape and Site Treatment It is recommended that the applicant modify the proposed site scheme to include features that encourage and facilitate pedestrian circulation to, from, and within the site. The following improvements will need to be made: a. Create additional high quality focus areas along the sidewalk, including connections to existing small commercial development to the east of the site. b. Create additional landscape areas on the west side of the site along 51st Avenue South to create a stronger buffer between the hotel and single family land uses. BAR Staff Report Extended Stay Inn America Page 9 3. Miscellaneous Structures An illustrative exterior lighting scheme that includes measures for evaluating the impact of glare on adjacent properties. b. The building signs are currently proposed for two on two sides and one on the south facing facade, and four of the five signs are proposed to be mounted on the roof of the building. These roof signs and one freestanding sign are not allowable and will need to be revised prior to approval of any sign permits. EXTENDED STAY INN E95 -0034 15451 53rd Avenue South December 5, 1995 j,c( Project description: A three story hotel located at the junction of 53rd Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard, just west of the Interstate and Route 518 interchange. Fosters Furniture and an office park currently occupy the site to the east. The site is currently accessible by car and public transit on Southcenter Boulevard. It is estimated that 458 trips per day or Tess, according to ITE trip generation manual. The site, currently vacant and zoned regional retail business, is scheduled to include a 30,000 square foot building with 96 units and parking accessible to all areas accessible to parking. A Iandascaping plan surrounding the entire site is proposed to include northwest native plant materials, grass, deciduous and evergreen. Construction will not go beyond setback area or creek buffer. The site is scheduled for construction in the Spring of 1996. Conditions: eotech Report:(Gary Schulz has other comments regarding the following environmental conditions) Drainage perimeter drains will be necessary to accomodate seasonal drainage consitions Floor support - specific soil type and content recommended Foundation - extra support necessary Slope - building must be set back from slope and surface water must be routed away from slope 51st Avenue South Bridge Project: Watercourse Rating - Type 2 classification will require the limitation of piping to shortest lengths. Type 2 also limits watercourse piping in areas where relocation or alteration of the watercourse has been denied. Therefore, piping serves as temporary piping; permanent piping would need to be considered unbder the Reasonable Use Exception Process involving a public hearing before the . Planning Commission. Other Conditions: Slope bank and Gilliam Creek to the north are classified as environmentally sensitive Boundary line adjustment will be necessary Temporary erosion is possible until landscaping is installed. Protective measures are prescribed in geotech report. Creek area exists to north along Southcenter Boulevard, classified as Type II water course (amenities and structures) g ing specifications - energy regulation Slopes: reduced (graded ?) to accomodate better access Color scheme: two colors To Think About: Design review for franchises er Questions: SEPA and BAR Sensitive areas: slope bank and Gilliam Creek to North History of past agricultural use Effect of street lighting on site Style, and effect of lighting fixtures proposed for the site Views out to highway Amount of 'solid' parking, not really dispersed around the building ,: kw - .a.�,av• z Z • �w U: U O` (0 o'. WW; J CO u-; w 0: • D :: _° I- al _' z ,E- 0: ;O tn•. WUJ` 0; =' z. BOARD OF ARCNH.TECTURAL REVIEW DESIGIT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR S:TAI 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Construction of a three story hotel--- approximately 29,172 sq. ft. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or'tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 15451 53rd Avenue South Parcel #115720 -0031 & 0041 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: LPN Architects / Royce A. Berg Address: 1201 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 102, Seattle, WA Phone: 206 - 583 -8030 98134 Signature: Date: 11/15/q5 * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: ESA Development, Inc. OWNER Raymond Frey, Vice President, Real Estate Northwest Region Address: 1075 Bellevue Way N.E., Suite 117, Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: I/WE, [si gnature(s)] swear that I /we are the o mer o contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the egof g statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 2S 665 NOV 291995 PE:PMI T CENTER �w 00: co w 9 co LL, wO UQ. CO D 20 f- w o. LU U� O D, 0 17 w W Oi ui Z UN. O H, Z aUArill L'r Ati ;tb► i c(;TURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPL1 %�TION Page 2 CRITERIA The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its derision- making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. if the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form:. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: ■ Building is centrally located on flatter portions of the site to preserve perimeter landscaping and afford pedestrian access to building. • Parking areas are dispersed around building for ease of access and allocation of parking. • Apparent height of building is reduced by setting building below 51st Avenue South. Scale is further reduced and character added with pitched roofs and stair modulation to break up facade and identify entry points. 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. __Appropriate landscape transition to- adjoining properties should .be . provided. .. C. Public buildings and structures should established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: • Patterns of windows, railings, overhangs and exposed stairs create interest and break up building mass. • Landscape transition between existing properties are similar in character. Existing significant perimeter landscape buffers are preserved along the north and the off -site existing freeway landscape buffers the southern areas • Facility relates to existing adjacent facilities through use of sloped roofs and residential scale elements. ■ Site circulation is limited to existing east cul de sac with no access to 51st Avenue South z a w u) C.) o; Cl! cOw: • w o w • ga w 'CO D. .t-w. z;. o:. • . z t- ILJ •o �t All w'. • U. .Z. • U N'. 17.F. • ouMr1U Ur /- iriUril 1 Eel URAL r VICW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC': -tON Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to.beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: • Substantial existing perimeter sloped areas have been preserved leaving a natural mature background when viewing the project from adjacent and distant vantage points • Access points to building and parking areas have been reduced in slope as much as possible to facilitate on site access to units • Landscaping will highlight entry points and buffer units • Trash and recycle enclosures are on north side and enclosed - -- service is on the west side and buffered from 51st Avenue by grade differential and new landscaping. • Lighting is integrated with the structure for control and security. 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. •. bOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC `ON Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: • Building is proportioned and balanced with window patterns, door patterns -- -eaves and dominant stair and roof modulation. Color are varying and highlight architectural features to provide visual variety. • Mechanical equipment is integrated in architectural character. Satellite dish is on grade and buffered with landscaping. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: • Entry plaza occurs at east side of building with informal outside seating under entry portal. 1- UP a; .oO u,o; „,,w;. 9 w O' u. a' • I- al UJ . gyp: U :O N, .W W` Z: •o '. 0� V s r;cic ;a sa"u P ai S �v ='Y� S; s� a it i' :tar suv:Uv :; racy ire .s- nuz xr aca:hi uwx, +x. .mow Y S t3 WARRIOR Floodlight Ordering Information • Catalog Number Logic tams 7• Applicationv Warrior ofidrs a variety of tamp and mounting options in both SIPS anti metal hulid.. These combine MVP watertight construction eru' adjustable light cutoff to make Vdarsior Fortrct for rnatines, storage: servIco areas, parking lc•:, and Sight industrial areas. 70 -400 WATT PS /MP{ Dimensions w•, •1•r Product -- Family r;?:ttiPS V.Toma:r•uf 1.1v • N• Mout t ng Lamp Olib��VL10r Tr.•• Wattage /hose 7 :L.;qr :fir. 1,30.1001P +7M. :p1-r 75.i 25iti'i •''J14t:f ?r" ?53W.P. 31 :1 430= 40C■V /P.1: ;-,1 2150X03.7.5524 1' ;:.. %; -1 ; :t :t....... :e \:ti r:", 11, ! :f� : :n:. • : :! :••ij'C2 :....••.si cc•E tacit !IS. Ili F:): :741t -.E Limp' Lamp 134114AI rniP. Wattage TYPO ?i S HPt wPS HPS H "r SFS H ?5 !?=c 1A'ry' i n Mr. N' Catalog' Number HPtin :9•E5S 7C tiFWFi•5sS•1' :0 hP'.vA•65S• ?SC H"PWR.65S•253. <13 HP'.vA•55S•:,7, Mr4V9415S•250 Mr11VA•65S•400 70 1G0 150 2.5'0 :50/40C cCv 1 ?: 25;! 4CG 5PA 13 ;S 1 2 13 i 3 H. t. Wt. (Lbs.; 3; 1 '!0 33 Vol ass 309 ?rp V:i' 343.2.1'.) 377.27; 3 :7.3e7 i;zst: S•lporrt Volume Ate :eve: ,c ray? it i ^•C ^ :!J1: : :i r ?,]?• '.her; ;a] C` :J %1; JI 1 122.7: r3: l: Y9•! :3a: . r• 1 : 6:' o . : i; 337 _CCr, 1 :< • •.tr ?9 ICf a :'J i';'C ••� • 5'I ii.�.: a i;.l: n '2;'•,t ?i Yi.l • Star.S11c :1 .L :, .74y. :.a S! !s:1 • {SAC: Options iidd as *OM) FES:NE W nitcaetFCta F;.Sirtgie:u;f: :'2C.:t 277' 'r220out e F.t :1i33 31 4301 C23 =3 u''2.3c1::: cr' :v•1 C :2 =2 of : d ! .:r! : ,•..,• =: CE3 u' 5 3 J S. 102 LUMARK Accosaor..s (oedor aep:rstetr) Oa 1014.P,ctucleari: 1713 ;.0 C:+.1C1 j_P`,o :zelecitic cJrtr;1, 1J6•235 veli tam:, ts;•e OA 021.rticicelEt.1:r.: r :Jt;PDI a, %;;l' iJtlyia Pa.I ?Or Butter. °h•704 :242.05ui;tai en;. :o: ^° :rt.r 2CE.:253•. ;I : ;' p■ut^,toi;:51. 2.%r1' t' 01lte: ?r1 . 5:.��Ofi'� :2, 14`L'i:NF :Y.4 :i Vi3,:1'F4.1 :311B3i •^I•i0 • FA5.2• ,,:;rr;;e: tr.! *av :orT^'1x!r-• ;_ • fiA6 =?:Cr1t a•,;'• c' :` . ;i? .. S'•r.°:r•i•r; • ter ; ••:'1- .;.? nECEIVED OF TUKWILA Nov 2 0 1995 ■:'i;;T CENTER i Z: CeW; aa a; Wes: '1 . UO • CO 0'. W W 4W O` J = a; W` • Z1 UC ;W W% • Il. O c lil Z: • tYFi nEiCR!oTION Ir.: cad SAle VP. 200f.., • 50.1i': Sar.as • iaoini; i:I•oriiv Saving tf:c.'itlui;cv r., arcred fet;:t:t. • • „s corne:s .11/11:0;:e ?d)ility of W.: 101;. tt, d.o.cr:t Wows art! abSOM 1.,10;p:t ExtrA ti1 or.lt.100. on:ycarbOnale rvttl 00tical tleilf,ps; th;o ed.mt.ft5 the iam0 j.I awroacte. light evenly, 1) listect and C.S A. certified kr v..1incation5 AFPLiCArION. The 0k:ratio. versatile r Sot.me EC'EW is perfect for use ir.corr:durs. clormitoriOS. tc5t tOOrns, r3p10 tOnsit sip.14:,nr„10ading (300.r. .rid run inraitutionS ! rtef Jeiit A rpt,C.F: vv. 1:$0' 1010. All t•;;;! sr.s igA ar;! 5:cie (e.;:tic;ry •-.-Aittr1c).C1t;;;1.:•!:; C■i•'0 8 F;Ist en*/ s ropx with c.:111.:1 Se 'lead% rtrecse%1 lens 10.1•;;,...rove; ia;•rioe•• ref:mar:1:e Pci1.'erhe( s • r.ap;ive 10 me •0 ;.P3led hy :peens 0! a net.10re,e o•ring. C Reftecto, 16 El.). CRS v.:th refiectance CrOlYeze. 1")•:)%vCer cc at finitth 0 D SCE )-.),..;;.••;1 Ar Cd*.tt al•.• ...1.• %;•.:t..•• i-;•,:10:1,•■fed r•J: f.":.: p:Ivor:tur 0:1:Witt E Limn F Socket EXCliCateo to cot:ect v..6:tas,c, Innanceto:v•It is r;7:•.;;.e tv;th • 0t355 rc:ew G Gast.el One .;ett EPiff'.1 ge4itefs coa. ewe to!•:, 001:Liettj. H Eptia:•.; l.t!lw.:A•C•sfze.-d •.",%n;; Co,204:1.•vocniric.: NPF sorr.e Cr.nsuft o•.*.ltr r.g FAIL-SAFE • :t,T7,)".. "r1::...• • EC 9" SQUARE G B F 77, • tt,41;,Arti=e4pii‘c2.,.:...At'tmO' UV 9• SQUARE 7 VI - 2 8 W F.,J;.:iOSCert 7 5 W 1,c.0 r. taleranowans POLYCARBONATE 6" SQUARE LUMMAIRE Clear Prismatic or White c ••rri:.1 c I .1 c Vandal Resistc!nr Luminaire r1 SIDE p nit 1■4 $C6 C•stiHti I t I 7.r• COOPER LIGHTING !I • L. MOUNTING OWE Nic.:!C.N5 Ervia,Co. CA:A :11e.r.r1.:M OM, t. •••• Oleo: t1 '.• • • . . . , . ,• • • ; v • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTER • ; TYPE. t?ESCA1P710N The McGrew- Ed•:toil Concourse III is the most versatile, functionally designed. universally adaptable outdoor Ii'2ht,ng available. T nrougn a variety /31 mounting styles, it offers a family of low profile sharp- cutoff luminaires that make optimum use of today's high output HIO sources. APPL1CATION Er.hancing natural landscapes as well as cityscapes, the Concourse III brings outstanding performance and style to walkways, parking lots, roadways. leading docks, building areas, end any security lighting application. U.L. listed for we locations. CSA certified. A e $DEt'Ir,t A ?•G:t Ftniu;tS A Latches Two sprirlt:t••:le. i dtitrrr !t.'1• as..1 latches cn hCUStng tOr 1'.•0'!2Si entry. 2 Socket Porcelain mogul -base screw shall type lamp secret Lath spring-loaded center contact. C.—Hot/floc One•Diece, Cie-cast alur;sinurr, housing features usthcticatly pleasing soft-corner !1rsign. 0...tj 7tskcting Closed cell gas•filldd high temperature silicone S;.sk ?tine; COmpletehy sods optical system from din. bugs or other foreign material. E.• Lens Thermal shock and imppact- resistant clear tempered S!SSS. 53.4cGRA - EDiSOEW O :t••; C ne•t:'it Ct: t1yC'J::r:r,ad prov.de ::■C different cpl:cel UtSlrto�a'Cr13 anC :neap t.aGrr control. Ct• Moonling U 1 iv•LtSal mo.nti;iy clamp concealed in hau ;ng fill 1 112" to 2 J:e•'.i.'_;. norl:tntil terion.s without aJac:ters. Provids., o -�` vcrtikc1 leveling aOiustrnet`.t H Etallast Casily rcrfovaale n,gn power f3 -tor HI 1 tVltiiti•Tap Cal:i,st is Stlnoard. 1 Hinges Integral hinges prevent do3r rocking and optimize eall•';, capabilities. F • t tl \ 1 ..\ i ▪ • i t G 1' i I11j1s1 l l _ \ i ;r 1 ~ �,� rt ' 1 , I , : DIMENSIONS ' Nfl 1; Iit'. , t ISO ?.Trt: ti III i • J: t1 • tld: nte•1 Round PO4 117---77 .I; ■9 Dis• It • 11 IL0:TT.1 I •._.,r.- _.,..rt I is i R 6i• 1 1Sa1+'"' • 14 • 1378 V nA • E. i•411...1%. SUa•e Fo:t SPIDER /YOKE MOUNTS CSCONCOURSE 111 7 0- 4 0 0 W High Pressure Sudivm —roe ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHT ErveRGV DATA M:•RractAce 6r•H.0 Input M'4r7:, 701•, NrS'01 ?SS Vr•tts, 10ow HP; •,T'r • 1)0 Wbtty 7501 \'t+tin •,:r: Cvr1 SAtlit:7 tni•ul \Vane 25Ovt• ;-.•• hr•. Ova Watt•.i CAA 3.n..t i■trr.t warts Ii ?,S Fir ^ :7%,; RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTER COOPER LIGHTING .:6s3� °..::::::�5� "z�,.S�i�:;::J;.;si •�r,s.a�x:, ..1'` - 'x::;`�r:�W:ctiwr�,;:.� 3 4 .13 Tt;M TRICS dndlepower Dis1ritution .• I - • 5 4 3 2 t • T 2 3 Test No. 766591 c3DEC•2EN• 120V Lamp -29W CF Lume rx =14C ORDERING INFORMATION SC.M•LE NtmaER• QOEC•16N•120V I r I.Tae.., Tube Fr cres.4ent ' 2:2•O0ea TYS'e Pt.toreseent • DP -20 F!Yt•es:em 1 IN.lncandeietrs Product Family r Scuare lumina :•e$ EC -Clear P•.em :tic 1.1,14 Ew.wn,te POlveorowtote Lens Catatce Number 77EC.7N.120V TTEC•1N•1 :0V oDEC•1eA•12ev ODEC•2)N•120v GDEC.2771.120v GOEC. 7A•t20V CDEC•2sN•122v 13DEC•1eA•120V_ D0EC.21A420V 1TEw•P 54N 120v 'T1W55.1N•120y OOEW,PP•11A•12CV .� DDEw•55•27N.170V ODEw.PP•27M•12ov ODEw.PP.27A•125■1 G:Ew.P4'.21r :•ItoV C.D5w•.PP.1ttA• 176V ODEw.PP 2ta..120 ' 1NEw.PP•75.120 J : S Footcandle Table Se ;eel mount .' nap.,( e”.4 (L.:0 ec,:•St to: rect:tai:e vi• ` of can ,r: I\tountin{ eteilnt Feeteera,o Vatiree ter EC•I __Ifotocicetsdte ein� r_e A [ _ C_ o _ E e. t ;3,)to il.3t PSC v33 -) ^? =�. 0. 114 ... �•'13 01.5 0' .... 7L��i.C1' Paint Configuration F.F•Perireeter Pant 10�i:Or• :i, 6 :2cn is /elm Confieureslon None Non. Hone Nene None None Ner,e None None W a t t s S e 11:w1f7Y 16.\5w 21w21'W 22.22W I7 +4:112 1 t7.5%vN. • Lam, w.n.ge Tw.n Tlbe Twin To.* 9 11 25 26 2C 211 1 13d1IY9 1 1 %olt e tamp L21 :4•t T i m e _ _ _ _ _ - -- �o� .PF NF E V: Op :ion, Accessories 1 , 91." ,g :o F..1ed L5•120L.Pnclvc►;' s' it' tnrt. c r: IP+•: ?71••rnotzte! :!.. = r`•4- •::•P::.�t i 5CE- S.e.2.,1 Cont.1,: So! LC ^sir.. I .�E•Cor.v n.e -,e :..:le: tin FSn.6430r. Su•ic:e M..tntio; 1 YnS0.V• 4 S::e..C•r:ver ;a, alt ten: Sv.. +: R 2•'.'•F Strew :live• E•t ter 01 .0 .2 E:e::••••..t' :11 :w Ou00 Tuoe ti:'? NPF tiiecIi t2n W, yule 12113'o:C1aeTJ_e Cwt' 74s,r ID P1u0txcenl 'eleetr6rir_ :0 f1Y6reeeFe •1 £1� Ct:rgnl: Not, • 21..44 t•.o..•e :.1 S•OM•d Ht:•,4`11, %0, .e♦•.I.Cr 1, 4.14■4 C i.._I: 444" Energy Data Net W1. elnCvt Yrstea! ;160 120 75' 16 21 12 21.5 ;A.0 34 C• 75 75 75 75 Volume ICU, rt.l 043 0.43 0 43 0.43 43 ' 75.0 7.5 0.43 320 T5 047 15.5 7 S C 4: :1.5 75 043 Perimeter 7 Twin Tube _ NP`._ �` 1: 0 7,5 - _ C.43 Pe+imelrr 3 7 «.n Tat NPF I2.0 - 7 5 C.43 Perimeter 1S. Cued Tube __ ,_` t•\rc :tunic' 21 7.5 0.3 Perimeter 16 �12:12W0.,:e11:ae •;P: 047 - Per :melee 25 l21131' 0 =L1 Td Tube -,rPi_ - 14 0 7.5 0 £3 PC•imtlet •21 2,+ Goad Tan E,c' run, ; 15 0 0 41 Perimeter 20 01.+24 T\:bc _ -� NPC 23 : 7 5 0 s2 1'erintete: 16 :v Fl:a :ef ern: . -. ____ EI••:::t_�'' to 5 7.5 0.43 Perimeter 21 7D:.- .ret ; -n: -- _ qt" "'t. - - :15 75 Perimeter 54.. 75 75 1,■eanees:d.n: !rA�... -. -. ...r +.L :Net ,r•1'A•1.••v +'i WI • t. :I:CM 'co eM.1.,,,\a Ji•I.•0 y00vCt eau 4044 "terCw. •wJ 0•w•Ms a.t t..,:I I] (nett... H.4..( ".014t el ,,ra...r1 «•1Jt• u.,.l..t so• run ,.1 •,.Je41L,.: yip 11,9,yL. -11 Y•.3 :'K Vpwt n•I'••i 204.•1\ 1 C.n a••. C.•560C1 t,.n•et :••,t .J ..t C0'1.•I :JC.C•. 12• t'K,r.. \{ C•,I•\.21 , ra,; _.' '.." .77V 4.x'4:1. -.I rN 31y: 11..3.C5.4•11,.... £112 4.4 It04 )' lit,/ i ^C 1•W „^r.I. :V;. 1•:13:. 0 COOPER COJPre L. ;Nt' .; . C!i'..U`:4i ?SL'tti ,:.1,...S:113;;, R.,,Z,i;.s,11.162 :,,14:,1'.4%. iiii..i.. U• ht:Ai f:f4AN . ?•.sf" •�ti.•4:vu.cY.:a1•avv.i,:.... 15 2 *1 RECEIVE CITY OF Till<W 1 /, NOV 2 ___ PERMI7 ^r r; ... , 4221 Se.. ;1•P,.•a ;.si.. ;1.i ....: ?.. .•: 1. i 7':2.1).:]7 5AY.. 3! ::4 :.4222_ TvP( oisciprioN The Feil•Safe VR 20(2.0 E.)ecorative Series combines strength.gaining architecture with eaergy-saving iechnolOgv. Architecturaliy a nijk:C.1 facets with radius comers actually increase the ability of the lens to deflect blows and absorb 'mp3Ct. Extra thick injection molded polyearbonate lens incorporates an optical design that obscures the lamp image and spreads light evenly. U.L. listed and C.S.A. certified for wet locations. APPLICATION The durable, versatile Decorative DO-VE/DW-VE is perfect for use in corridors, dermitories. public rest rooms, rapic transit stations, loading docks and minimum security institattons. c CATALOGE SPECiFiCA,ION FEATL:A.ES A Lens One piece injection molded UV stabilized polycarbonate. min. 0130 thlck All light control prisms & bionde!s arc o'. me inside surface of the tens. reducing dirt build-up and making cleaning easier. e Fastene es TwO Stainless steel TOR' screws with center reject pin. Screw heads are recessed into lens to maximize :amper• resistance. Fasteners are captive in the lens and sealed by rneans of a neoprene 0-ring. C.. Mounting 16 ga. CRS mounting plate with white high reflectance polyester powder coat finish. We' (167,ntr.1 P.1 \N.) A.IAT o SCC■ FtOusing (Cp.:lona: Accessory) POW' •14 c.'da. fasoenits 'ere re:Ou■rez1 1rd iTIOX:11"Ith'n vandal reSit'falc.e. Cjt itrt.i w::!) Ic,or f\. PT .;n:ries E tamp i.Sy Others) F Socket Folycerbonste: Dedicated to correct lamp wattage. locandescent is porcelain rrietti....rn base with nickel- plated brass screw she:I. G Gasket One piece die•cut closed cell EFD:v1 mounting gasket ssa:s entire tern sod housino. H • Elsilast (Fluorescent Only; Capper•vvourld IvFF ballaSt standard. HPF magnetic or electronic i.)&16St5 are available witr. some tamps, F • • SIDE DIMENSIONS L: 3 1/3. MM.& A:.1.11 1::41416•11, .0e Moynw.c ...1,1,•• t3' •to•. 11.43. SCD Casting I I I ) 159.,■mi tatimmt COOPER LIGHTING z • MOUNTING DIMENSIONS 6 eos• I 31 I I ifi3rnml 1---1 FA1L-SAFE' DC-VE DW-VE DECORATIVE 7 W 2 8 W Fluorescent 6 0 W Incandescent POLYCARSONATE DSCORATIVE LUMINAIRE C!enr Prismatic or White with Vertical Eyelid ,.; `"4 • Vandal Resistant Luminaire A971:( 6: ENERGY DATA o E•ta:p Mar.aler.sent ;c.10 It.c:■.141,. 0:1: tt., 01104 litlUrt refer tC, Ts: JtJerin; Iftt,),r-.at.co if1Cal RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 PERMIT CENTER A:45.4C2E- tt 5 -1 0 TOME TRIGS snellebovier Distribution . i .. -; • 1 • r''' • 2''' --r----r,. • ,./.4.------ -"' ,..17.---;.•=',..sr I it 7 1; ; a A e c;o E • • • • -1-• I / ; ; I ••.,. , 1 L , " 5 4 3 7 1 0 1 1 3 4 i Test No. 7813655 CIDOC-PP•213N•120V Lamps2SW Compact Fluorescent • Lumens.16000 ORDERING ITIFORMAT1018 Estf,A LE f4UMSER: cobc•vcotu.Inv • Lamp Type Product Family Print --I . VE = . .1 ; ...___I . 1 I • rt...r.......) ht. f Decorative : 50.4a i Ftuveticent • OC.Cledf Nan'.31iC tels • CD-Ouat %DO 1 Lees I ,. I Stow:v.11 1 '4:Vertical Eyelid 01WAlcula Id1.1ncandescent 1 Folyearoonata lent • 2620-4270..t:1, 211•28%9 f tuotetcen: ' Footcendle Table soc•zt mount.; red 1:: itI, 11 e! it91,:ittcare.te Mounting Hoot Fontcanald Values for 000P.1 itoicotTandly 1.1440 A 3 178 0 89 03', 018 09 0 c:. C' '00 O50, 0 2^ D 10 00 .2 07 to 0 Ed 0 32 0.13 0 0E 0 C 001 Configuration Wettest. EiellaLt Voita•e i 1 2 0 V FF:r icr I t..6: 1 2:7V. I ,. 2C1VII 1 lt.QI1 rover foLtor' I A-E:ector•.c. Dc.ve‘Ow•Vt et ()pl.:14 F1.! -1.4 ..1%..ste• • 1.....t.arr:4•Ir;:.fiic Czrst,uctic.r, • Accocsortes • 1E.'20s, ..p=r.010,4 5-Sails0e C0e.8.,e, Los c.05•Con•enier.Le 01! P4 PE,4-15014.8 54.t.8.1e mcuns,n; YMD-Y.E, Scre..4f..of for all Lens Szteess vAsc.•.r.ot scse.osiver tot dill 1.4.4 5410.4 leo •titao.C:1•Ahaf. L41 1.C.N4 te1•.• 1.07 •81,1.1,VC*11/••4 CA*1.9 f:umber Paint Configuration riE1C•VE.7N•1701, Verrzcal Eyelid 7pC•VE4N•170V vert.eal Eyelid • C•eiv(ii3r:it20%, vartizat E ?ego Ct3DC•VE•18A•120t1 Vcr.icat Evnlirl :700,7NE•2:IN.120%. Vert,ea: OnDC.vt -25A-120V, Vel;eal C1C7,C•VEins1.120v .NTantivE.60.120V Venicat Eve'ic. Velicat Evelic Lamp Wattage 7 13 15 11 20 .10 Lamp Type Twin 1 ube Twin Tube Eal;att Energy Gate Net Y:t. Ty,* Itnpuf Warty -IC NPf 12.0 4 0 S:Pf _ 17 C 4,0 Etet:rcr.:' 2D S - 4 0 NPF 27 0 4,0 Elett,t...0 27.0 40 t.rf 37.6 4 0 CI.30 0.20 TuCe - • :D: 10 PAL,. P01.$ '4s Ciffte,..Al:.:e.cmot 0. ixt....411e0.0"s '0' 01 pior..ci .12 t4 is...04414001 840 C'144O41..4•...thit I I: '3't' .%P.3,. 44,44 & .114■•,4 1,41.44(44S,, ON .44 .44.0e...441 ovIC h..•••:.11 24•10 110.0t41 p.a•..2./.”.•.2. 1441,, Ct. .SCIZIN 10. .1, I. 11%.1•110.Ie II. CwIr ...Mr.; ; 21.N, gne ..rt •C 1.• 54.1121 vsiutne- 'cu. 11 I 0 :; 78 25 0.25 7 28 29 :r8 :9 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 0 1995 I' i� / 1 1 I r••iji i• 40 .221111fT as 0 e • ry a �•M• 0A• •►.T �..E ., 1l �. /^r� rte. rtyl wr: S ' 4.%3 23- 4 "...., T./ 4 ,p 'f • ,•x, a `,� r-• r • , ., p vVa. Oa 1 'c• 4 • sa 1 t:1 ;1 y- , ay. 11 u + 41 1 •1 ih Ai wail./ O•J 4', elf 4eagel:a i ti `.x4411. N , . ti vrY 'P; 0 4 Ja ai • 4 10 •t _. —O•_ ' w tri Hatt, 'I{ k 41bY- z 90 ge et if" 1 4174'.0 k Z1J s t Hoes oos •-Q7 t!.!rP /,• b R 4. vs IF KA35 iss. /t.r • rt. rs• • et 840 i€:0 r •y s- ISO • 70 23: �.loo o .:• j y7 � + th I ra a 14 4— i -mss -`7. s c y^ _ xr' 1 C. 'e. 0 , 4 ! .ST € .4 ...." os.tif . :1 i (lb i► "Kola asses /sA •r 513 + AV M ./ .v ,.... •. 4. was t IFU SP re -32- et 1.91 t,0et k Ziti °I " f ID Z'f Ili % !Ir.! e ik 1I % O i ....... 1 += RA rl ALS.ify .'4. _z,; AG. 1 s • unringeb— items ■ 'O� t1 OS tri jp. ; 62140 AVE. S. 1 t .4 do.o•R 1►..42.i • Es7 • - •tc•s?lii�� il* P 3Z1. ze> 4S 1 • V • 144'6% ?',;v.wi:< �:;�vi�<isn:J rot, iU•: 1Gtif�"r.<:•Y�.aa +�Y1t.M'�i:fRiN.. 3 i4 t .. t. y} • L. WO, 1e I x> r oL.00lt• 4111* V. R44... Hats _ to* ; ;. ;10 C EXTENDED STAY INN ;i f5" Li,. Cn Li; W W1p� co § hi' v cv � cr tt U 0. MS;�2E 1'eRiAr`*Y: `Kk3f'.p'A�'i��Wiir•L:i' ilc'al.'';�j,'l�.h`c'es'.CF P3a:' ::4..:4 e.1i64 `a l ia,':ileg:'•e3a?'4.41ta'.ita`Jn si{C'.iai•:SCJ';:Mtl'tif• :1,644,835. /0l lit► J� �.= �....,t,:�5 1 !oak i'fif NI71,026. 2 5 THE CITY OF SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF'ENGIN" ERING ROY W. MORSE. CITY EN TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SECTION 22, TWP..23 N., RGE. E, s �I oN 2 AIRIALO SURVEY 0 • • • 200 100.; a!;d':- _..� • ,Yr INEER • .1M TtON FEE', ',' '993 z w 6 00 W W J1=.. Nu.. W 0 2 • t. =• a 1- _ zI- 1- 0 Z 1- U• � N c) H. W H u. H WZ • =. O~ z 34.22 -T ' 800 ••••-• 1000 FEET . INC .,h 6. h:t „..L... yt'Ef` .'� .•,. ti,.r i�r:. • .ORADO `"Contour • intery oleo Feet � ; `- r = ' .TEXAS tys.;of, Seaffle 0 , •�'. h. its MI MP MO NM MI. •••r„. ; :. _�• ' '. > } :.f :tit► * ": ':yt� • ;? • • • �Y, HtB? M!' A'+ �Iw�arsm' tf- S�roVYrNriviaw+• 4ww; M, ar�rery% m++w.aa..�+,Yr:nx:•r.•.- ,;,.ar r;..:•r:m.,+�-e:r,re�ii�r. +t .r:.v.rvr.eC Vr^+•! rriv+ ln... wt :.�•IVx'r•t•- .••;•k�Wr.fY�vw -rr .� M1+.YAHI•wer.VS•r.n.•In , s;