HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L95-0069 - NIELSEN FARMS - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTL95 -0069
NEILSEN FARM SHORELINE
15031 GRADY WY
(EXPIRED)
1,77177-..:TA7-#1)4i407-7--foia
" • • .1e.0•?•4._
•
DO68 0e61*.e/ Aft/(1-01)
7:oo wt.-
. . :
177'777, -7", , 77". -7 • .• • L. • -7-.: . ... . • . . . . . . .- .
...._.......
. . . . .. . . .
. -1..4..
• i . . . ....
. . . . . . .
. . ... . . .. • .
. . . ..
. • . - ... • ... . . . . .
. .
• ... -... • .• .
. . .
. , . .
. .
--1-•• • ' . : - ',-
. ., . • • • • • .• L.1 : „ L. • .. ' .. • , .....
..: ....•:.::.. • • '...••••...
.• "...--:. ' ' :. • —
, .,:.....:.•.: . . .1 . . .. .• . . Li
• I : , • L• . - • • • .
• i • • - . i
• . d IL - -. . '
. • •
-! I
• 'I i•
1 1
i L
!, L • •
•-• 1
1
, .
• ,- ...._........_______...;
•
• • ,
, •
, , •
, .
, • 1 I
• .
. ,
, .
• . .
, •
, ■ • •
, . .
. •
. .
. , •
• .4--i- .-.
. . ,
• - ,
, .
•
• . ,
• , .
• t i .
. •
, • i
. , .
. .
1,
' ■ ; .
1 i
. •
SHORELINE SUBSTAN 1'IAL DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9L.788
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
FOR;STAFF OF F [�Ni
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Approximatley 148 Unit Homestead Village
Hotel and approximately 146,000 square feet warehouse buildings.
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection)
14 acres property bounded by S.W. Grady Way on the south side,.
Interurban Avenue South on the west side, Green River on the north side, and BNRR
on the east side.
Quarter: sw Section: 24 Township: 23 . Range: 4E
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
3. APPLICANT:* Name: O'Keefe Development
Address: 7900 S.E. 28th Street,#400 Mercer Island, Wa 98040
Phone. (206) 236 -6200
Signature: Date:
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
4. PROPERTY Name:
OWNER
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
Address:
---79 at SC 2 3'- -1--;
t .mss 9Eo4c
Phone: ZC)(0 23(0 ea 21:1,-6
I /WE,[signature(s)1
swear that I /we a the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers containeiLin this
application are true and correct to the �OF TUKWILA
l�P / CITY OF TUKWIIA
best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 2/05 5 [j E C 4 5
1995
PERMIT CENTER
z
r4 2
J U
0 0;
0) 0
co W.
W =.
J
u-.
W O:
2
U. Q'
N
�w
z
zoo
W;
20.
00
O 0'
0 1_
V_`.
.. z.
W
O
,t1(.!titLINt 5UbS 1 AN 1 IAL Uf;..Y.\tLUFMtN 1 AI'NLIUA 1 IUN Page 1
5. Present use of property: Renton Sand & Gravel maintains large soil and sawdust piles
on the Northeast portion of site to manufacture topsoil. Numerous residential houses,
barns, shops and sheds occupy the site.
6. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project (include additional future
developments contemplated but not included in this application): $4.4 million
7. List the master program policies (use program sections or page numbers) which are applicable
to this development
8. List any other permits for this project from state, federal or local governmental agencies for which
you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has
been applied for (and if so, the date of the application), whether the application was approved or
denied and.the date of same, and the number of the application or permit:
Board of Architectural Review (BAR) - City of Tukwila
Shoreline Permit - City of Tukwila
Flood Zone Control Permit - City of Tukwila
Building Permit - City of Tukwila
Utility Permit - City of Tukwila
SEPA Review - City of Tukwila
Boundary Line Adjustment - City of Tukwila
9. Nature of the existing shoreline. Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood
plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such
as sand, gravel, mud, day, rock, riprap; and extentand type of bulkheading, if any (to be completed
by local official):
The shoreline along the north property boundary of the subject property is the
river bank of the Green River which consists of approximately 2:1 slope that is
vegetated with grasses and brush.
10. In the event that any of the proposed builidngs or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet
above-the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential
units existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view (to be completed by local official):
No residential uses exist near the property and views will not be obstructed.
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEC 1b1995
PERMIT CENTER
w w '.
6
J O!
U CY
cn w:
H •
CO W;
W O•
2
u. _1
iw a
Z �.
E°
III us
V0
,O N'
0 H'
wi
LIO:
ui z
UN`
H I
0
z
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DFAELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 3
11. If the application involves a Conditional Use or Variance, set forth in full that portion of the Master
Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a
'Variance, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official):
The zoning is classified as "M-1 District - Light Industry" which allows the
Hotels and Warehouse uses. Therefore, a Conditional Use or Variance is not required.
12. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within
one thousand (1,000) feet in ail directions from the development site:
The subject property is surrounded by Grady Way/Interstate 405 to the south.
Interurban Avenue/I-405 Interchange to the west, Burlington.Northern Railroad
to the east, and the Green River to the north. There are some offices and hotel
developments and a few residential houses within' 1,000 feet of the subject papperty.
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEC 1 5 1995
PERMIT CENTER
4,4
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
August 5, 1996
Department of Community, Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Thomas M. Lee
O'Keefe LLC
7900 SE 28th Street #400
Mercer Island, WA 98040
-RE: Nielsen Site Hotel and Warehouse Proposal
L95 -0068 (Design Review)
L95 -0069 (Shoreline Permit)
E95 -0036 (Environmental Review)
Dear Mr. Lee:
This is to follow up on my letter of July 22, 1996,•informing,you of a pending expiration date of the
above referenced application.
This is to inform you that the above referenced applications have now expired. If you wish to
proceed with the project, you will be required to submit a new application, fees and comply with
current regulations.
If you wish to appeal this determination you must do so in writing no later than 5:00 P.M., August
19, 1996. If you have any questions on this action or on appeal procedures, you can contact John
Jimerson at 431 -3663.
Sincerely,
eve Lancaster
DCD Director
cc: Edi Linardic, LDG Architects
SL:JJ
C:\sepaVnieexp.doc
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
. •
•
July 22, 1996
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Thomas M. Lee
O'Keefe LLC
7900 SE 28th Street #400
Mercer Island, WA 98040
RE: Nielsen Site Hotel and Warehouse Proposal
L95-0068 (Design Review)
L95-0069'(Shoreline Permit)
E95-0036 (Environmental Review)
Dear Mr. Lee:
As you know, the above referenced applications were submitted for approval last December. In
January we sent Edi Linardic, acting as the applicant for your project, a letter which identified
several items that needed to be submitted or addressed before the project could be advanced.
Two subsequent letters, one in February and one in March, were sent requesting that you clarify
the disposition of the application.
It has been almost six months since the original letter was mailed and we still have not received
response to any of the three letters. The purpose of this letter is to, inform you that if we do not
receive the items identified in the January 26, 1996, letter by August 4, 1996, all of the above
referenced applications will expire and become void.
If you wish to keep the process moving, then you need to provide the requested information by
August 2nd. I understand that Homestead Village is no longer pursuing that site. If this results in
significant changes to the project, a new application will be required.
Don't hesitate to call John Jimerson at 431-3670 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Steve Lancaster
DCD Director
cc: Edi Linardic, LDG Architects
SL:JJ
C:\sepa\nieexp.doc
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
March 13, 1996
Edi Linardic
LDG ARCHITECTS
1319 Dexter Avenue N #260
Seattle, WA 98109
RE: Nielsen Farms
L95-0068
`J.]4.570069 '
Dear Ed:
This letter is to follow up on my previous letters to you. As you
know, March 8 (last Friday) was a deadline for the Nielsen Farms
resubmittal to maintain a place on the April agenda. Because we
have not received the revisions, the project has been removed from
that agenda.
As such time we receive the revisions, we will schedule the project
for the next BAR meeting for which we are still accepting
applications.
Again, if the prOject is going to be canceled, I would appreciate
a letter requesting withdrawal of the applications so that I may
close out the files.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call me at 431-3663.
Sincerely,
oh Jimerson
/ Ass ciate Planner
cc: Tom O'Keefe
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
::.1111MInaltlallritang.MinfleVNIMenriMMS"VPICIPMPWCOMMIVI.OefferrAUNWleelnai
wom.r.pgreetexwerassenonnor**9................
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
February 22, 1996
Edi Linardic
LDG ARCHITECTS
1319 Dexter. Avenue N #260
Seattle, WA 98109
RE: Nielsen Farms
L95 -0068
Dear Ed:
This letter is to follow up on my previous letter to you and our
subsequent conversations. As you know, we have passed the February
16th deadline in which we needed to receive your revisions . to
maintain the scheduled March 28th agenda. Since we did not receive
any revisions, the project has been removed from that agenda.
We have tentatively re- scheduled the project to go before the BAR
on April 25. To maintain this schedule, you need to submit the
items listed in the previous letter no later than March 8, 1996.
As I understand it, Homestead Village has pulled out of the
project. If that causes the project to change substantially from
what we have already reviewed, then the revisions will have to be
submitted no later than March 8 to make the. April 25 BAR.
Significant changes to the project will also require an amended
SEPA checklist and revised traffic analysis. These would also need
to be provided by the March 8 deadline.
If Homestead Village's withdrawal is resulting in cancellation of
the project, I would appreciate a letter requesting withdrawal of
the applications so that I may close out the files.
If you have any questions on these comments or would like to meet
to discuss them, don't hesitate to call me at 431 -3663.
Sincerely,
imerson
iate Planner
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
January 26, 1996
Edi Linardic
LDG ARCHITECTS
1319 Dexter Avenue N #260
Seattle, WA 98109
RE: Nelsen Farms
L95 -0068
-L95 -0069
Dear Edi:
This letter is to document the items that we discussed this
morning. As we discussed, in order to keep on schedule for the
March 28th BAR meeting, we need to receive the revisions no later
than February 16th. Your suggestion to provide sketches of proposed
design solutions to the buildings is •a good one, and I will be
happy to work with you on achieving a design that meets the BAR
criteria.
Additional Submittal Requirements
1. On the hotel, show all four building elevations.
2. On the warehouse, show all four building. elevations. Use a
more workable scale. Each wall should take up the majority of
the width of the page.
3. On both buildings, call out materials and provide color
scheme. Provide appropriate dimensions.
4. Provide colored elevations for both buildings.
5. Provide the number of compact parking spaces on each lot (30%
max), and identify their location on the plan.
6. Provide 2 cross sections from (and including) Grady Way to the
river which cuts through the warehouse. Provide a third cross
section which cuts through the hotel. The purpose of this
cross section is to identify the visibility of the buildings
from Grady Way and I -405.
7. Identify maintenance path and show paving material. This path
should also double for an on -site amenity for guests.
8. Label Puget Power tower as such on site plan.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
9. Identify use /facilities /improvements in the hotel courtyard on
the floor plan.
10. Dimension depth of all banks of parking spaces, and show
typical widths of the parking spaces.
11. For the warehouse, show rooftop equipment location and method
of screening.
12. For hotel, show locations of outdoor mechanical equipment and
method of screening.
13. Show limits of grading and limits of clearing on•the site and
provide existing and proposed contours at north side of site.
14. Show the various shoreline environment lines on the landscape
plans.
15. Show location of trees and identify which are to be removed
and which are to be maintained.
Development Standards Not Met
16. On the hotel site, a minimum five feet of landscaping along
the east property line is required.
17. On the warehouse site, a minimum five feet of landscaping
along the east and west property lines is required.
18. Technically the warehouse building meets the parking
requirement, that is, assuming that the entire building is
warehouse. Realistic estimates of office needs must be made
(and floor plan provided), and parking . must be provided
accordingly.
19. Some of the compacts are shown as 14 feet. deep. Required
minimum depth for compact spaces is 15 feet.
Shoreline Regulations
20. Per 18.44.140(1)(B) and 2(C) TMC, parking /loading areas must
be screened from view from the river. For the hotel, it is
not clear that the parking will be adequately screened. For
the warehouse, although over time the photinias may grow to
the required six foot height, berming north of the
parking /loading docks and planting of large stature deciduous
trees should be considered to provide additional buffering.
To maximize effectiveness, the berm should be as wide as
possible without disturbing the river bank. It should also
provide a natural transition of grade and vegetation to the
undisturbed land to the north.
1
UO'
co 0`.
cu
W.
J
w O'
2
u_<
U 3.
F_ °
w.
z
P
Witu
O N
G I-
WW
I
O
Z`
V (0
O
BAR DESIGN ISSUES
The site enjoys exceptional prominence and is adjacent to Ft. Dent
Business Park which has been developed with a high standard of
design. The level of design of this project should meet the level
established in Ft. Dent.
Hotel
21. The hotel design is subject to the guidelines contained in TMC
18.60.053. The following comments are based on those
guidelines.
A. The City is constructing a segment of the Green River
Trail along the site frontage (Grady Way and Interurban).
Safe, attractive and comfortable pedestrian linkages
between the hotel and the trail should be provided for on
the site /landscape plan. You can contact Joanna Spencer
in Public Works for obtaining details in the design and
location of the trail.
B. The entry into the hotel site needs to provide a high
quality visual focus. This can be accomplished through
a combination of building design, landscaping, paving
materials in the driveway, accessory entry structures
etc. Whatever approach is taken, the entry should
provide one with an initial sense of high quality
development at the entrance.
C. The tower does not seem to be architecturally integrated
with the building. It appears to be added on in a manner
that doesn't quite fit with the building. Revisions to
the tower should integrate the two as well as address the
need for a quality entrance.
D. The roof acts as a dominant feature. Ways of breaking up
the monotony of the roof, including varying the roof
line, should be explored.
E. The proportions of the portico's result in those elements
acting as weak features, especially on the wider
elevations (east and west). Changes in the proportions
can strengthen their prominence.
F. Opportunity should be taken for use of the river as an
amenity. A trail is shown leading to the trail. Provide
other facilities for guests to enjoy the river such as
benches and appropriate landscaping.
G. The landscape plan and building design are in conflict.
The building plan shows exterior doors for each unit
around the perimeter. These doors exit into planting
areas rather than sidewalks.
a+,: xir:s;rriS�tiniirtt�?a?'iiia:.r2
z
mow+
NU);
CO
w o'
Q
= w'
z
1-0:
Z
• 1:31-•
:w w'
O;
• w
Zs
'0.r
:z
H. Where possible and appropriate, significant existing
trees should be incorporated into the site plan.
Warehouse
22. The warehouse is of particular concern given proximity to
major highway interchange, Green River, Green River Trail and
Fort Dent Business Park. High quality design should be
provided.
In particular, the building doesn't meet criteria 18.60.050
which states that monotony of design should be avoided. The
building provides virtually no modulation, little in the way
or architectural detailing, has a lack of variety in materials
(and presumably colors), lacks texture or other means of
providing visual interest.
Treatment of the loading docks is of significant concern.
Service and loading areas should be screened from view per
18.60.050(1)(B) and 18.60.050(3)(F). The loading areas on the
north and south elevations are highly visible from the
development in Fort Dent Business Park and the proposed hotel
set a reasonably high standard for the vicinity. Significant
improvement is seen to be necessary in order to meet the BAR
criteria.
Site /Landscaping /Misc.
23. To the extent possible, the transformer should be screened by
vegetation.
In addition to the BAR and Shoreline review, the SEPA' review is
still in progress. I have just received Public Works review on the
SEPA checklist and will soon provide you with the status of the
SEPA review.
If you have any questions on these comments or would like to meet
to discuss them, don't hesitate to call me at 431 -3663.
Sincerely,
//i
John Jimerson
,Assoc ate Planner