Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L94-0038 - MUTH OLIVER - BONSAI NORTHWEST DESIGN REVIEW
GREENHOUSE FOR GROWING NURSERY STOCK -NO 14427 51 AVE S 0 DESIGN REVEIW PUBLIC HEARING Staff Report to the L94 -0038: Ebenezer Church Planning Commission FINDINGS VICINITY AND SITE INFORMATION Page 2 General: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP). is required for Churches in the C -2 zone and for off - premise parking areas. The applicant also requests the Planning Commission approve a deviation to parking standards. Project Description: Ebenezer Church of God (The Church) proposes to convert an existing 2,521- square -foot building to a church. In the past, a variety of uses occupied the building including a community center. The current Church membership is 65. Location: The existing building is located on a split -zoned site. The front 100 feet is zoned C -2 and the steeply sloping portion to the rear (approximately 165 feet) is zoned R1 -7.2. The site is located at 14275 Interurban Avenue South, south of the Interurban/ 58th Avenue South Intersection on the west side. Access and Parking: A single driveway accesses the property from Interurban Avenue. A gravel parking area is located on the south side of the building and will accommodate 11 parking spaces. Landscaping: Low shrubs exist along the north side property line and some groundcover along a portion of the front. No landscaping exists on the south side. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning: North: Single- family C -2 South: Single- family C -2 East: Office M -1. West: Steep vegetated slope R1 -7.2 Staff Report to the Planning Commission DECISION CRITERIA L94 -0038: Ebenezer Church Page 3 The Planning Commission is guided by the following decision criteria for Conditional Use Permits a church and for off - premise parking. The applicant's response and the staff's response follow: (A) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. Applicant's Response: 'We plan to help not only in spiritual ways, but also naturally. Such as upgrading the building and grounds, and making sure orderly conduct and conversation is maintained along with safe operations by each member." Staff's Response: The building has not been occupied for over two years. Consequently, the building has not been maintained: windows are boarded and a section of the roof is in need of repair. The Church proposes to pave and stripe the parking area to accommodate 11 parking spaces within two months after occupying the building. A total of 38 parking spaces are required for the Church. Quinten Control Systems N.W., Inc., and Northwest Source Group, both located approximately 3/10 mile (1,584 feet) north of the Church, have agreed to allow the Church to use a total of 35 parking spaces after business hours (8:00 a.m -5:00 p.m Mon.- Fri.). The Church proposes to shuttle people from the two off - premise parking areas to the Church in their 12- person van which will be parked on site when not in operation. The Church's hours are Wednesday through Friday from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., and Sunday from 9a.m. to 3p.m., and from 6:30p.m. to 9p.m.. (B) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy; Applicant's Response: "We are willing to comply with the performance standards at all times and set good examples by striving to exceed them.:" Staff Report to the Planning Commission Page 4 Staff's Response: L94 -0038: Ebenezer Church The amount of combined parking would be 46 spaces and exceeds the parking required by 8 spaces. The orientation of the existing building make it impossible to meet current performance standards related to on -site parking. The TMC requires 5 feet of landscape area along side property lines and ten feet along the front. The applicant proposes to install shrubs and two trees along the street front and shrubs along the south side property line. The applicant has indicated that the Church does not have adequate resources to install landscaping and pave the on -site parking lot at the time of occupancy. The Planning Director can authorize a letter of credit for 150% of the cost of improvements. The applicant has indicated that improvements will be installed two months after occupancy. (C) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Applicant's Response: "Since we will usually be in church during off -peak traffic hours, there should be little or no problems but ever we can do to ensure general compatible we are willing." Staff's Response: Based upon the hours, conflict between peak -hour traffic will be minimized. Shuttling members from the Quinten and Northwest Source Group sites to the Church site is acceptable to both the City Engineer and the Department of Community Development for the following reasons: the City Engineer will not support parking across Interurban Ave. since there is no signalized cross -walk opposite the site on the east side of Interurban Avenue. Secondly, additional parking spaces have not been made available to date closer to the site. (D) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Staff Report to the Planning Commission Applicant's Response: "Yes" Staff's Response: L94 -0038: Ebenezer Church Page 5 The following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land use Policy Plan are applicable: Commerce and Industry Objective 1: Encourage a smooth, steady and planned growth of the .business community. Policy 4. Encourage the use of live landscaping in all developments. New landscaping is proposed along the property frontage and will meet landscape requirements of the Zoning Code. Policy 5. Promote renovation of areas which are not aesthetically pleasing. See response to Policy 4. Policy 7. Promote adequate provisions for parking for all land uses. On- and off - premise parking Tots will exceed the number of required parking spaces for this use. There will be no time conflict for parking lot usage between businesses and the Church. (E) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. Applicant's Response: "Yes, and it not again we are willing to do what is necessary. We assure you we are and will not be a problem, but an asset to the community." Staff's Response: Potential adverse impacts will be avoided by providing a shuttle to the two off - premise parking lots to prevent parking within the nearby residential area and to avoid pedestrians crossing Interurban at non - signalized locations. Staff Report to the L94 -0038: Ebenezer Church Planning Commission Page 6 CONCLUSION General Review Criteria (A) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare... In terms of land -use, the Church is a compatible use within the C -2 zone. The proposed is more compatible with the abutting residential land uses as compared to a commercial use which is permitted outright intensive commercial use. Site improvements including window replacement alone will significantly enhance the visual appearance of the site making it more harmonious with its immediate neighbors. The remote parking area combined with the shuttle will help avoid impacting the surrounding neighborhood. A shuttle has not been made part of a project proposal in the past. For this reason, the Planning Commission should consider re- evaluating the proposal if there are parking impacts to the nearby residential area, or on the east side of Interurban Avenue. (B) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards... Off- premise parking and a shuttle from the off- premise locations to the Church site is proposed for this project. The total number of parking spaces provided exceeds TMC requirements for churches. The proposal will comply with landscape standards. (C) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. The site plan reflects the site's ability to maximize parking and safe pedestrian and vehicular circulation. Due to the distance of the Quinten and Northwest Source Group parking lots, staff feels the shuttle is the best solution for bringing members safely to the site. It will prevent an unsafe crossing on Interurban Ave., and prevent members from having to walk during inclement weather. (D) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan does not specifically address church uses in commercial zones. The Conditional Use Permit decision criteria provides clearer direction to staff and the Planning Commission when evaluating the appropriateness of conditional uses in their relative environments. Staff Report to the • Planning Commission L94-0038: Ebenezer Church Page 7 If left unoccupied, the building may continue to deteriorate. Although this portion of Interurban is zoned C -2, residential uses exist on each side of the Church site. Given the existing land uses and site constraints, promotion of the church use will result in site , enhancement and a use Tess • intensive than any number of commercial uses allowed outright in the C -2 zone. (E) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. No adverse impacts are anticipated with this proposal, however, if church members park within the residential area to the west or on the east side of Interurban Avenue, the Planning Commission should re- evaluate the project for possible revocation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit with the following condition: 1. If the parking does not work or is not complied with, the Planning Commission may revoke the CUP at any time. . t t .(•..�•" ��..IJI.J W C.w I-yza �w.•S •zzo.:zEox{LzzYir..:ru.4z:m.cszraa-eLi+f+ F•m.s.7r�.L�.:.t�i:"��Si • i • "<i.o. --"T/ \ ,..#_... t MY -I- + t4 t•• \ v♦ • w V • 1\ TTT i �T r \ <` • ,•• ?-* 1 . --1- -r 4 • AFDE t 1c) q 3 ii'• ^`�i i'f'- tt �a Y� x I 'a..v F 1 2 1 al -- n T • � j 1 U o cr► I r<• AY 261994 �;�1t�Viif{UN 1.TY ELOP11 !r-t_r\i•f'. Iari�w��w�rr t�l't— tY.iayss►'+� ` �` h�7��� "'°r`!�r�'•Sr""'�J�1SJ!fKt OGa•►trNti r►n ladder 11.7 theww i egner ONCOR INJERNAJIONAL i r 4,1E N''C" ) rA L_ )g-1*---HooloP (CO ,r 4 0 r— • -■ • r ',Ay 2 6 1994 comi\AUN rry D ELOP NT 11•••■•■■•••=..• P • . • )i 3-1* a Q. (f: 4. . I r ckt• 43 . QA •--r114. 0 ...VP‘ ,.,.. ''r •-• Tb ''. t4Y- h 0 . (N .... . . t• ."•:.: ta • . a , • f • - . • • VL................ t° • • ... . , — • . ........a.mit . ......_ '- • JILL. ......... -------.---r:.. i- ; • ' • P41.4a4hvetir is - • T..1 mgrnyrw. br1 cc"- LI 2 tico, ay. 5 , • Prr . F A'f l0R -t1I ('a" ligH) NJt71TUR -ILU F'1 FUR-• MEN FEL- JSH�p P • FL0012- FLAN :mod co12 "oc. ,-f ICAL- t1•H•U. _1 1 I Al te- NIL QUENT(N. Msni.w..(rvc. May 26, 1994 To Whom It May Concern, The Ebenezer Church Of Cod In Christ may use 20 parking spaces in our. parking facility on Sundays and week nights after business hours. 9 /) Cliff Olofson President 3 M q RE CEIVE? qAY` 2 61994 Cucvirviuwr r'Y DEVELOPMENT,: TrivA 14001 57TH AVE. S., SUITE 100 • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 -4793 (206) 241-5200 • FAX # (206)241- 0862 ,..;'. ' • . . . • , . „. : AttAIA Source Group A Northwest July 20, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: The Ebenezer Church of God In Christ may use 15 parking spaces on the north side of our parking facility on Sundays and week nights after business hours. Sue Knox President kint\Q1 fts isrr 13975 INTERURBAN AVE. S. • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 • (206) 244-6205 FAX (206) 244-9929 ' • • " • • ..• To: Denni Shefrin, Planning Division From: John A. Pierog, PW Development Engineer Date: June 30, 1994 Subject: Ebenezer Church of God 14275 Interurban Avenue South Project No. PRE94 -009 Activity No. L94 -0032 Conditional Use Application Review Comments The above application was reviewed at the June 21st Public Works plan review meeting. It was determined that, prior to PW approval of this conditional' use, additional information needed to be provided by the applicant. This information would include pedestrian volumes between the proposed church facility and remote parking. Also, adequate provision for parking needs . to be identified. Parking on the east side of Interurban Avenue South is not acceptable due to safety considerations. These comments are consistent with those provided by PW at the March 31st DRC. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Tnx. JAP /jap cf: Development File ECE1 ' S. ! 4 JUL 15 1994 DEVELOPMEr T A F F I A V I T Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting fJBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Ei Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O P D I S T B. I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit OShoreline Management Permit O Determination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance 13Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice fl Notice of Action 0 Official Notice Other —1 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project .' lJ 111E File Number (Ad 60 �'Z� S") 1P)°1.4 Signature 4 4ir.,. ALAL r ' • The Southland Corp Ave Tax Dept Loc 27482 P.O. Box 719 Dallas, Texas 75221 Ted Finkas P.O. Box 594 Toledo, Washington 98591 Warren B & JoAnn W. Davis 5906 s 144th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Mario A Segale 18010 S Center Pkwy Tukwila, Washington 98188 J.M. Wood 14305 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 J.M. Hawkins P.O. Box 61977 Vancouver, Washington 98666 Alois U & Beulah J. Hillstrom 818 South 27th. Street Renton, Washington 98055 Roger L & Glenda E Grosse 14250 59th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 Ronald V Porthen 14254 59th Avenue South Seattle Wasington 98168 Metro Land Development, Inc. P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Fairway Center Associates Co Park Properties Development Co 14240 Interurdan Avenue South #216 Seattle Washington 98168 Mabel J. Harris 14301 Tnterurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 David R Sivertsen P.O. Box 714 Tacoma, Washington 98401 The Southland Corporation Avenue Tax Dept loc 27482 P.O. Box 719 Dallas, Texas ........... .�___ • Glen L.. &.Lori D Kanewisher 14235 59th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission will be holding a work session at 6:00 p.m. and the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 8:00 p.m. on July 28, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION - 6:00 P.M. The Planning Commission will be holding a work session to discuss regional issues, vision, blocks and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. II. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 p.m. L94 -0032 Ebenezer Church of God, Reverend James King Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing community building to a church. 14275 Interurban Ave. S., Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING L94 -0038 Oliver Muth, Bonsai Northwest Design review for a new greenhouse 14427 S. 51st Ave., Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Distribution: Seattle Times July 15 & 22, 1994 Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 A F F I D A V I T O F Notice of Public Hearing Notice of. Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet fBoard of Appeals Agenda Packet • EPlanning Commission Agenda Packet JShort Subdivision Agenda Packet D I S T I B U T I O N hereby declare that: Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit • • Fou02-ot was all7e'd to each of the following addresses CDetermination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice. . ONotice of Action El Official Notice Other 7 Other -Name of Project 04-- (X)-J File Number on Signature PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE94 -009 PROJECT: EBENEZER CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST MEETING DATE :March 31, 1994TIME :• 2:30 SITE ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV S The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information maybe needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PLANNING DIVISION — Land Use Information Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) I j 2. Obtain the following land use permits /approvals: C) Rezone Li Shoreline Management Permit ( ) Shoreline Management Permit Rev. Short Subdivision C ) Sign(s) C ) Subdivision gacAuS '4° (36 DG cfittoCt (PAC-CALA /y LJ 3. 4. 5. Boundary Line Adjustment Building Site Improvement Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit ' S 44(4 Design Review Design Review - Interurban Environmental (SEPA) DcnaiDS m (---Th Unclassified Use in- tPAcr5 4v C.U.(', Planned Mixed Use Development ( ) Variance Planned Residential Development Zoning designation: 'rSite located in sensitive area? Other: Yes No CS Lo e-s Minimum setback requirements: Front: 2..0 Side: I 0 Side: (0 Rear: 10 Maximum Building Height: Height exception area? [j'Yes No 4S1 cooP67eirn `id j 6. Minimum parking stalls required:2S (, G Alandicap stalls required: 7. No more than 30% of requirea parking stalls may be compact. No landscape overhangs into compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hitting the curb will be required. Minimum landscaping required:' Front: t 0 Side: S- Side: S Rear: 0 Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). Roof -top mechanical units. satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. Trash enclosures and storage areas must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. Building permit plans which deviate from that already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re- application for design review approval. 13. FRom w 8 9 . 05 ScA-Pe Cc.ePrConr Po SS', !? E. P(2..avr O O S C: Y. PUS c - zsg fee G(G A- 5614 " r /'oar Goo) .� /31 /9'44 JIC C.3r�FM.p7"ron( Fp.on4 T2Ucre Loot -Awy.G 8. 9. 16. _.F 0S11_ o-r kc,il- nmo^ gr) FOf M€-t' T ,4N Q4 Mohr -rHS -rHe LJ 17. IGAA A///(G • Co Ai A4 .MAY .1.1A1 VC- 5'611/44 Gr . urNDSC,W #MG 145 G4EA -C.. 18. LloWl -cot(T LM mid b7'f1e c4 nSc+ FUGG t-fh11/417)SGA-P /Al G lee-acd/Reir), 19. LAsrlj SCf{%,is( C- pA- R_KrA( Y co4k6NT Ej: 20. yrithmAlLtS CSC .nov Fob, GrxccspriOn/ , ZJ 2 I 4-pPu C AAr r MAY S u. BM r'7" in1F, oRm An OA!' oa . PR2 -v-iovf LAST F /S �.� Hv��r• -?/-?(/71- Checklist prepared by (staff): • �-- .� Date' 15 o� . Su2vcry e a 'De+tioaS T2A-r'Cr $ (7-Cr" PAW POW/ 8 /G r 7'j� PRE - APPLICATIN CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION — PERMIT CENTER 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE94 -009 PROJECT:.EBENEZER CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST MEETING DATE: March 31, 1994TIME: 2:30 SITE ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV S The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. BUILDING DIVISION IX 1. Comply with the Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition. 2. Comply with the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1991 Edition. 3. Comply with the Washington State Energy Code, 1991 Second Edition. Provide C(c energy aiculation s stamped by a Washington State licensed rct•i ect or engineer (see attached format). h7y )97L n e i) ;11 e O 7 f / /pl€ccne5' ( a: f al e /hp 4. Comply with Washington State Barrier Free Code, 1991 Edition. L� 5. Apply for and obtain the following Building Division permits and approvals through the. Permit Center: • Building Permit • Rack Storage • Mechanical Permit • Demolition (building) • Other: 6. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. " 7. Construction drawings must be stamped by a Washington State licensed architect. 8. Structural drawings and calculations must be stamped by a Washington Stated licensed structural engineer. 9. A boundary survey prepared by a Washington State Registered Land Surveyor must be submitted as part oi the Building Permit application. 10. Temporary erosion control measures shall be included on plans. Normally, no site work will be allowed until erosion control measures are in place. 11. Rockeries are not permitted over 4' in height. Retaining structures over 4' in height must be engineered retaining walls, and require a permit. 12. All rack storage requires a permit and rack storage over 8' high must be designed for Seismic Zone 3. A Washington State structural engineers stamp will be required on plans and structural calculations submitted for rack storage over 8' high. 13. Construction documents shall include special inspection requirements as specified in Sections 302(c) and 306 of the Uniform Building Code. Notify the Building Official of testing lab hired by architect or owner prior to permit issuance date. The contractor may not hire the testing lab. 14. Construction documents shall contain soils classification information specified in Table 29 -B of the Uniform Building Code, stamped and signed by Washington State licensed architect or engineer in responsible charge of the structural design work. 15. Demolition permits are required for removal of any existing buildings or structures. 16. Comply with UBC Appendix Chapter 35, Sound Transmission Control (R -1 occupancy group). 17. Obtain approvals and permits from outside agencies: `ELECTRICAL PERMIT /INSPECTIONS are obtained through the Department of Labor and Industries : (248 - 6630). PLUMBING PERMIT /INSPECTIONS are obtained through King County Health Department (Inspec- tions: 296 -4767; Permits: 296- 4727). M KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT must approve and stamp plans for public pools /spas and food service facilities prior to submittal to the Tukwila Building Division (296- 4787). FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS plans are reviewed through the Tukwila Fire Department (575- 4404). 18. 19. 20. Checklist prepared by (staff): Date: V3 0/I PRE- APPLICATI6N CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION — PERMIT CENTER 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE94 -009 PROJECT: EBENEZER CHURCH OF. GOD IN CHRIST METING DATE:March 31, 1994 TIME: 2:30 SITE ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV ' S t. 7v. iY' y+''A.`•'` .:, �iaw, �i?, cni.,. v w t�Li,. ,.�..... -• s. ... ..... r .. ... .+-. •f��� „o �< »aybe a 31..., grrreq uir entstregufattonsrmay.need toabe met a: IL•, r. 11 i •U ...ice:.+... 1 + . .. , .... � . FIRE DEPARTMENT - Construction information . The City of Tukwila has adopted the 1991 Uniform Fire Code. This and other nationally recognized standards will be used during construction and operation of this project. (TMC 16.16.120) 2. Fire hydrants will be required. (City Ord. #1626) 3. Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by the Water Department, and fully in service prior to start of construction. By line of vehicular travel a fire hydrant must be no further than 150 feet from a structure; and no portion of a structure to be over 300 feet from fire hydrant. (UFC 10.301 and City Ord. #1646) 4. Automatic fire sprinklers are required for this project. Sprinkler systems to comply with N.F.P.A. #13. Sprinkler plans shall be submitted to Washington State Surveying and Rating Bureau, Factory Mutual or Industrial Risk Insurers for approval prior to being submitted to Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. Submit three (3) sets of sprinkler drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. (City Ord. #1626) 5. Maximum grade is 15% for all projects. 6. Hose stations are required. (City Ord. #1646) 7. A fire alarm system is required for this project. (City Ord. #1626) Plans shall be submitted to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval, prior to commencing any alarm system work. Submit three (3) sets of complete drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. . Special installations of fixed extinguisher systems, fire alarm systems, dust collectors, fuel storage, etc. require separate plans and permits. Plans to be submitted to the Fire Marshal prior to start of installation. (UFC 10.301) . Portable fire extinguishers will be required in finished buildings per N.F.P.A. #10. (Minimum rating 2A, 10 BC) 10. Buildings utilizing storage of high piled combustible stock will require mechanical smoke removal per Section 81 of the 1991 UFC. 11. During construction, an all- weather access will be required to within 150 feet of the building. (UFC 10.207) M. 12. No building will be occupied, by people or merchandise, prior to approval and inspection by Fire and Building Departments.. 13. Adequate addressing is required. Number size will be determined by setback of building from roadway. Four inch numbers are minimum. Numbers will be in color which contrasts to background. (UFC 10.208) 14. Designated fire lanes may be required for fire and emergency access. This requirement may be established at the time of occupancy and /or after the facility is in operation. (UFC 10.207 as amended) Ki 5. Special Pitt department permits are required for such thirigs as: storage of compressed gas, cryogens, dry cleaning plans, repair garages, places of assembly, storage of hazardous materials, flammable or combustible liquids or solids, LPG, welding and cutting operations, spray painting, etc. (UFC 4.101) 16. Fire Department vehicle access is required to within 150' of any portion of an exteriorwall of the first story. Fire Department access roads in excess of 150' require a turn around. Fire Department access roads shall be not less than 20' wide with an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13'6" (City Ord. #1632). 17. Adequate fire flow availability will need to be demonstrated for this project. 1.6. Checklist prepared by (staff): /t4,O6.e.So.� Date: CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION — PERMIT CENTER (PlE-APPLICAT1,6N CHECKLIST 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE94 =009 PROJECT: EBENEZER' CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST MEETING DATE :March 31, 1994 TIME: 2:30 SITE ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV S r V.•�/�RM�M t ry �illr rn� ry .,1. •'! . 44-9 (p'4-y. , l. wyl �' +SHa'! ,yVr' . (:t 'V i•A` ;1t.1t.•r: 1. ,r +lY'j'i3�"kt$' S n ens. . .r�1 /r i' - tYKt �. • !Rj '�a,4A/ :.i /ee��1 n ?:8. •,., ?r,rrf� • e. .947nor 4 FIRE DEPARTMENT- Inspections 1. Overhead sprinkler piping a. Hydrostatic test e. Hydrostatic test b. Trip test f. Fire Dept. approved plans c. Alarm system monitoring test g. Materials and test certificate 2. Underground tank a. Location b. Distance between tanks c. Distance to property line d. Depth of cover Fire alarm a. Acceptance test b. Fire Dept. approved plans LAJ .4. Hood and duct inspections a. Installation b. Trip test 141 5. Spray Booth a. Location b. Fire protection c. Ventilation d. Permit 6. Flammable liquid room a. Location b. Fire protection c. Permit 7. Rack storage a. Permit b. Mechanical smoke removal c. Rack sprinklers d. Aisle width 8. Fire doors and fire dampers a. Installation b. Drop testing d. Fire Dept. approved plans e. Sprinkler head location and spacing e. Vent piping, swing joints, fill piping, discharge piping f. Anchoring g. Hydrostatic test h. Separate Fire Dept. approved plans 9. Fire final a. Fire Dept. access b. Building egress and occupancy load c. Hydrants d. Building address e. Fire protection systems: (1) Halon systems (2) Standpipes (3) Hose Stations (4) Fire Doors (5) Fire Dampers (6) Fire Extinguishers 10. Other: a. b. e c. f d. g. Checklist prepared by (staff): -241 /kit 44 C4404/ Date • 3��� PRA.( WIRTATION CHEC1( ,IST MAR 2X2. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMA4UNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE- APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE94 -009 PROJECT: EBENEZER CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST MEETING DATE:March 31, 1994TIME: 2:30. SITE ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Milo con w. imentsare based on preliminary review. alone Information be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. ' XI 1. Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals through the City's Permit Center: (—) Channelization /Striping /Signing 0 Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk(3.4"F ) ) (7) Fire loop /Hydrant (main to vault) is� (7) Flood Zone Control"r'r'ry xd"'°" ( ) r,IG�oR EtErw riON> Hauling (2.000 Bond. Cert. Ins.) (� • (?) Landscape Irrigation(-..& No• 16) n (—) Moving an Oversized Load ( ) C71 Sanitary Side Sewer /FNej'✓sEA'✓/e.b.4—) Sewer Main Extension (private) Sewer Main Extension (public) Storm Drainage (sEE- nro /7) Water Main Extension (private) Water Main Extension (public) Water Meter (exempt) Water Meter (permanent)(2,c-A., '.s✓rc6) Water Meter (temporary) Other: 2. Hauling Permit required prior to start of any hauling of material on public right -of -way ($2,000 bond, $1,000,000 certificate of insurance, route map and $25.00 permit fee required). . All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. i —f 4. Water and sewer assessments may apply and will be determined during the utility plan review process. /1/oNE' 5. Provide sidewalks per Ordinance Nos. 1158, 1217 and 1233, or obtain waiver. 6. Provide Hydrological - Geotechnical analysis. 7. Provide erosion control plan as part of grading /fill permit application. 8. Identify building elevation above 100 year flood elevation per FIRM maps (use NGVD datum and recognized benchmarks) ��.a..• 5 atit /D /577e /Bu7W D n! v of v b �� weo.. Y e+`r1' 9. Provide traffic x ctc anal yvsis /trp g er io Astudy for: yS�s� 5°� 10. Provide developpers agreement fo : FA//2 _r:,C/A�P,F' PO 124..r.L lye__ ,r5l�GL11y9S1,C� 44/ .rfl W on/ 77-?& rSW S //7ir'oP4YEHEN73- /L" 4/D7- cOA✓s ree 7—& - 11. Provide9Ithe iollowing'easements and maintenance agreements:_Fo,P .osry /�rrci� • • P 12. Provide water /sewer availability letters or certificates from districts serving your development. 13. Obtain METRO Waste Discharge permit or approv$$I (684- 2300). QUS /NESS or- zzAE.e77ON /,o7-7AGVF..� 14. Complete and return to M RO (self addressed and stamp provided). n 15. Review the following City studies when designing your project and preparing your plan submittal: PL•NN /N¢ 43.4".". •2A'al"WAi 7?-24FiAt tL1-r rL'ip ■V .1 / /A-reet YlAk4-l3„. //Rf . • 16. , //?TAT /o,/! r fE1) ley - c- VER/FY. 7744.>" .p RA /NA4rE GO .f 7:40 ,44yAr ' .t"ot011za51. 7e7, pie/oR 7z) O/S - iii - . i J x �. .i �► •urn/ - 20. A V.l 4 YrJa ' iv%�� 1N0 v C. �e o c.a.. u rA'-'9 A-. 1.a et j- Checklist prepared by (staff): • (PRE- APPS {CATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION.FILE N MEETING DATE. Q; PRE94 -009 PROJECT:EBENEZER CHURCH OF. GOD IN. CHRIST' March 31, 1994 TIME: .2:30 • SITE °ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV S , 0, following coinmenis ire as .relim11.106 review: Addittonal.informatlon Omarbe needed t; Other,re yu1rements %regulations .mayneed #o be met. ENVIRONMENTAL S /i4 u c (A-1(%Q___ / S iVe- S J � J`� �� = qe-if f'e ql 510' / C��� plvt o_tee ,c7t/lbt-c-/A.r.e_ Qt 602/-cY-ri/L A_ , Me-77 '. i^ 1.1•C-ta 11..k( 5.72-4(1(1/' CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER -PRE- APPLICAT16N CHECKLIST 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE-APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE94-009 :PROJECT: EBENEZER CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST MEETING DATE: March 31, 1994TIME: 2 :30 SITE ADDRESS: 14275 Interurban AV S The following comments are based on apreliminary review. Additional informration maybe needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT The Parks and Recreation Department has no comments concerning this project. J Northwest A fource Group ' RECt !\ Ffl JU! 2 0.1994 July 20, 1994 DEvc�.vr'w�cw f To Whom It May Concern: The Ebenezer Church of God In Christ may use 15 parking spaces on the north side of our parking facility on Sundays and weeknights after business hours. • Sue Knox President 13975 INTERURBAN AVE. S. • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 .• (206) 244 -6205 FAX (206) 244 -9929 ` /. x .y n 11 l P . �' u a S b R &bi •P RFC RIED s4A' 2 6 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT H s e... - — /11:-4 L•'i • i i • S..h'/ i De) , • Ulf r,:v,_i QUENT(N i MsN.w..(NC. May 26, 1994 To Whom It May Concern, ''''' The Ebenezer Church Of God In Christ may use 20 parking spaces in our parking facility on Sundays and week nights after business hours. ,c) Cliff Olo£son President 3-0 14001 - 57TH AVE. S., SUITE 100 • . SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 -4793. (206) 241 -5200 • FAX # (206) 241 -0862' Lt r Lik °i S 143RD ST •KaU 10 MAY 2 61994 � thews COMMUNITY eki Signer DEVELOPMENT ONCOR.INTERNATIONAL •••r•• 5 •ivN,1110.tq ; i. •" ar. �yP`a;`.►ys�au.r:�•.,i.i:�i:: -r r �i' ' %J. •,u. ,,, CONDITtNAL USE APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: W pakcrlatSed AlS b r /4IN FaR 0 1-0,. C,kK2Ck W`'1,401 !S ct Sn2u(I Go n� a it 1 V 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) La- - ) 1 ] / oL 75 _T +cie.. LAa_ba F1-ve . S G . 'P.A�KG ;S 6-590' 144-0 Quarter: S. E-: Section: I Lf Township: �3 Range: (This information may he found on your tax statement) APPLICANT:* Name: fJa 3-avites % K:#J `�2. Address. 6 So. Ray ryta AYetre. Sea -18t_ VIL? Phone. Signature: -2--.T Date: S.- ?' y`,? * The applicant is e person whom t t will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY ° Ne 22 Citu2 ck or & vd -.7.0 N i OWNER Address: T, p . / ?/5-Y seder btAt. Phone: 2$ ;.9 I /WE,[signature(s)] 1.. L swear that I /we are the o afer(s) or contract pur "a `e (s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 5 - / RECEIVED Mpy 2 61994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION ri 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: V C ' N T 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): Lis) Co",ci ►oAn" u.sc —s Iisfed ,,k) s rFled use dcsc:fr. 7. ADJACENT North: I-I 0 LAS E- LAND South: o u Se. USES East: .it*e.2.+ -c.a_ 64 ,v West: 1 -1-111 w1 -/ -#ee-S 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): 0 ate_ p wl� ; dimAd ed uS e / + -: be_ Q jr he. 9 t) -!-itr n, tLWr% ..srAice_ ata- cat& was .�'ou c(e4 c9 N [40611 ii p2rn e 1 cs- aid w e &ea ch k c-cm. I tI �b co wtr�l� &sJ -1- e s e.Gi of i1eJ f iN e (Are_ m LL-PIA cud e 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? �25. Page 2 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: L L kie_ � )art D h e ' it10T :„i j� .SPl�1 f b�+ ato n �UIPaii . 5 aS a f2g2 i� -}k bu 1I Nq arin� 2�Ltivd. an K i u VS u, 02 eel 'to/Idur�'f " �a►fra COAJUelesc&l8/ G_ 10 N W t k s a -Fe D et2A.-fi0tt[S' u e.ac B. The proposed use shall meet or exceeft the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: litio I W 0_ ir._ w/ N. -Ft) co ✓y ood e�c CL les b j 54-kivi a eac CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 3 10. (continued) C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: , Si G�e _ w e_ t i II U such b�.. IA) cl0Qi N d4-7' eaK c� hOt4 S ie Sh%AM 19e_ --g l ;444 e_ Ole it) o (Potis b L4- ev tag.. ' we_ Ccc�v e_rvs c& e. 4e. 1 c 'tb1 e ckJe AR' i,u 100i41a, D. The proposeAse shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: y e.S E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPO SE: 'eS &r'c w ham jS an.• i,v; lI 1 1t1d7 4 a; t W e. ccg-e- � t i ��i;url eta , ect S'q .� 44)e- a,S5 2P_ Q (A.-/ GEC'. aafe Al 01+ b e ac pie-oh/ea. cut) ash' OM. a afrgtiPinGi 5U �NM el' )Z 1M fon .,. ,�_ . ;. � L94 -0038 OLIVER MUTH 1442'7 51 AV S City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor August 8, 1994 Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director Mr. Oliver Muth 16651 SE 235th Street Kent, WA 98042 Subject: Notice of Decision for New Greenhouse, Design Review, L94 -0038 Dear Mr. Muth: As you are aware, the Board of Architectural Review held a public hearing on July 28, 1994 and approved your request to erect a new greenhouse at 14427 S. 51st Avenue, Tukwila, WA. A ten -day appeal period has expired as of today and the Planning Division has approved your application for a building permit. You will be contacted by the City Building Department once their review has been completed or if there are additional questions. Feel free to contact me at 431 -3663 if you have further questions. Sincerely, LOiL61 6,1‘ Denni Shefrin Associate Planner cc: File:L94 -0038 • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 41313670 o .:Fax (206) 431-3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared July 21, 1994 HEARING DATE: July 28, 1994 FILE NUMBER: L94 -0038 APPLICANT: Oliver M. Muth REQUEST: LOCATION: 14427 S. 51st Avenue SEPA DETERMINATION: Not applicable STAFF: Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner John W Rants, Mayor Rick Beeler; Director Design Review approval to construct a 3,600 square -foot greenhouse. ATTACHMENTS: A. Information Sheet B. Vicinity Map C. Site Plan D. Building Elevation E. Landscape Plan F. Building Specifications 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington . 98188 • (206) 4313670 : Fax (206)431 =3665 Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review Page 2 L94 -0038: Bonsai Greenhouse FINDINGS VICINITY AND SITE INFORMATION Project Description: The applicant and owner of Bonsai Northwest, proposes to erect a 3,600 square -foot quonset greenhouse on Lot 9, a C -1 zoned site. The greenhouse will not be open to the public and will be used strictly for nursery stock. The proposed quonset greenhouse is similar in appearance to the existing greenhouse on Lot 8. The new greenhouse will be approximately 25 -feet wide and 18 feet high covered by white translucent panels. Site Description: Bonsai Northwest occupies two Tots (Lot 8 and Lot 9). Lot 9 is a 19,278- square -foot terraced site and is located at the southwest corner of S. 144th St. and 51st Avenue South. Two storage buildings exist on site and a retail shop and private residence and greenhouse occupy Lot 8, immediately north of the subject property. Access and Parking: A total of twelve parking spaces are provided on lot 8. Parking is accessed from S. 144th St. A second access from 51st Ave. onto Lot 9 is will be closed as part of this application and no additional parking is proposed on the subject site. Landscaping: A rockery will be installed along the eastern edge of the greenhouse similar to the rockery adjacent to the existing greenhouse on Lot 8. Perimeter landscaping is proposed along 51st. Ave S. which includes flowering Cherry trees and Ivy. Additional landscaping will be installed on -site including plantings on the sloped areas (see Attachment E). Surrounding. Land Uses and Zoning: North: Single- family R -1 -7.2 South: Single- family R -3 East: Single- family /Interstate 5 C -1 West: Single- family R -1 -7.2 DECISION CRITERIA Because the proposed project is within a C -1 zone and within 300 feet of a residential district, Design Review is required. The Board of Architectural Review relies on the following guidelines. The applicant's response and the staff's response follow: Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Review L94 -0038: Bonsai Greenhouse Page .3 Review Guidelines (Tukwila Municipal Code 18.60.050) 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE (A) The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. (B) Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. (C) The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Applicant's Response: "(A) The building has been set back as far as possible form 51st Avenue and 144th Street." "(B) No additional parking contemplated" "(C) Height has been minimized as much as possible ". Staff's • Response: Due to the site's topography, the greenhouse is at a higher elevation than 51st Ave. or 144th Street. The building will be setback from S. 144th St. approximately 122 feet and 56.5 feet from 51st Avenue S. No additional paved areas are proposed. Visibility of the structure will be screen by landscaping. The existing greenhouse will also screen a portion of the proposed greenhouse from S. 144th St. 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA (A) Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. (B) Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. (C) Public buildings and structure should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. (D) Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. (E) compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulations should be encouraged. Applicant's Response: "Landscaping will be added to shield sides of greenhouse" Staff Report to the L94 -0038: Bonsai Greenhouse Page 4 Board of Architectural Review Staff's Response: There is no established architectural theme in this area. The design of the new greenhouse is compatible with the existing greenhouse. 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT (A) Where existing topography patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. (B) Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. (C) Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. (D) In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. (E) Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. (F) Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. (G) In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. (H) Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielding, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Applicant's Response: "(G) Landscaping shall include: junipers, maples, English Ivy, Rhododendron. No existing trees on site except for two fruit trees near 51st Avenue. These to be kept." Staff's Response: Landscaping will be installed along the proposed rockery and new landscaping will be installed along the periphery including Flowering Cherry, Black Pine, Dwarf Bamboo and Maple trees and several varieties of shrubs. The nature of the nursery means a variety of plantings will be rotated on the property yielding a range of colors and types. One halogen light is also proposed at the corner of the new greenhouse. 4. BUILDING DESIGN Staff Report to the Board of Architectural Re (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Architectural s its design and Buildings sho developments. Building com proportions an be consistent Colors should Mechanical e screened fro Exterior lightin exposed acce Monotony of d detail, form an iew L94-0038: Bonsai Greenhouse Page 5 le is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of relationship to surroundings. Id be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring onents such as windows, doors, eaves and parapets should have good relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall ith anticipated life of the structure. be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. uipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be view. should be part of the architectural concept. fixtures, standards and all sories should be harmonious with building design. sign in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of siting should be used to provide visual interest. Applicant's Respo se: No response provided. Staff's Response: The existing greenhouse 30 feet by 60 feet and 13.5 feet tall. The proposed greenhouse is simlar is shape and color to the existing greenhouse and is slightly larger. The green ouse is a pre- fabricated structure with flexible dimensions. A building specificati•n sheet is contained in Attachment F. 5. MISCELLANE (A) Miscellaneou architectural buildings, sc surroundings, (B) Lighting in c guidelines ap • US STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the oncept of design and landscape.. Materials should be compatible with le should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and and proportions should be to scale. nnection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet licable to site, landscape and buildings. • Applicant's Respo se: No response pro ided. Staff's Response: No street furnitur is proposed. Staff Report to the L94 -0038: Bonsai Greenhouse Page 6 Board of Architectural Review CONCLUSION General Review Criteria 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. The terraced site allows for the building to be setback and elevated from the street, thus reducing the massing at the street level. Vegetation on the slope behind and surrounding the greenhouse will offer screening and an enhanced appearance. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. A nursery is not an intensive commercial use. For this reason, it is appropriate within a predominately residential area. The greenhouse requires only one employee and will not be open to the public. Therefore, little impact to parking is expected. • 3. Landscape and Site Treatment. Existing and new landscaping will surround the proposed greenhouse. Invasive plantings along 51st Ave. South will be removed and replaced by trees to visually enhance the street frontage. Building Design. The greenhouse will be compatible with the existing greenhouse in shape and color. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. As indicated above, none is proposed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of Architectural Review, approve the project. lot size building area parking lighting dumpster screen power gas and water line elevations t / 4442, _C-f. oo ( -- Je, cv) ArrAct-ktimffr C, p i t e h o S ' L r U GE • t. • • D C. l 1PT) O,3 0F: -7-0 R ' r L7 AkEA ESA. 4 4 A 6 ! 1 Y ' w )-1- , - e- Pis C ^D w rfl '3 (4 G P/-v c.. (IA)7.I'1c1;,1AJ • P 20.rret Tc jw ) P8-e. ( ,Q' V PEA r2-)g- 1 L�6✓ZG� tfBC� L P44 fpLt: 'a'V 1� LA�v >J.f crnO 1 t, (jVh) ti Pc'-(2.d AA D Bann -k c-4-1 )14- , FC.oLC`(z_vJG C iz,zy )4— ) 01, , ,e(AC P' -\jam' s1,1212.OvN 87) B`' DL0 Q. r3AH ' i;DD »N6 CfiIMO'' Ti22 --S //IQ° • • • • • • • • . ` • • ...• ....• . . 3 Cr- kra\CAME.0 E z GREENHOUSES MANUFACTURED BY IVAN & LYNNE SCHUENING AND SONS Our Quonset Greenhouse is also a multi -use greenhouse. It may be used as a propaga- tion house, growing house, wintering house, etc. This model has come through sus- tained winds of 90 mph without damage. 1 Our Quonset Greenhouses are built with the center perlins on top of the bows to stop poly sag and wear and help the greenhouses more easily shed rain and snow. In addi- tion to Poly and Shade Cloth, this structure can also be covered with Fiberglas. tWhen assembled correctly. CdlJsTR.vC i ?a--) 6 F- -LT- Cr v c4-1 A--r O U1L, .. 20 to 40' wide "Covering Nurseries Throughout the West" Oregon Valley Greenhouses, Inc. 20357 Hwy 99E • Aurora, Oregon 97002 (503) 678 -2700 1- 800 - 347 -2701 (outside Oregon) uonset 30 i0 40 ftv),t BOWS: 1' /A" steelpipe, .072 or .095 ga; Stress rating: 55,000 psi; 5' or 6' centers per need (4' for Fiberglas); Secured with 1' x 1%" sleeve, .072 ga. SIDEWALLS: 3 ft. PERLINS: 3 rows, 1%" pipe, .065 ga. LEGS: 5' x 2%" steel pipe, .110 ga. END BRACES: 4 @ 21' x 1%" pipe, .065 ga. Hardware and complete instructions for assembly included. Though lumber for end framing and sideboards is supplied by the customer, pre -fab steel end walls are available from the manufacturer. COVERS' available in Poly (40' x 100' ground to ground or 48' x 100' with sidewall), Shade Cloth (46' x 100' ground to ground) or Fiberglas in corrugated or flats. PERLIN MiltaltillVatl-l1N 2a4 WOOL` End BRIGS U u U U L er -�.� a �I- - a -1— �-- 2,6 WOOL 'Corers extra. LASCr) Fiberglass Greenhouse Panels The Leader in Roofing and Sidewall Panels Greenhouses are for growing crops and producing profits. No greenhouse cover – at any price – is better than Lascolite® panels in fulfilling that basic purpose: crops and prof Lascolite greenhouse panels transmit far more light than double -layer polyethylene ... equal to glass. Crop quality, yi, and profits are as much as 20% greater than under double poly. There's none of the brittleness of acrylics ... or the scratch - hazing of polycarbonates ... none of the special fittings extrusions required by "structured" sheets. And none of their sagging under heat, either. Add moveable thermal blankets (as recommended by leading university researchers) and you have maximum fi efficiency, as good (or better) than any of the costly double - layered plastics. PRODUCT SELECTION Crystalite -T TM with Tedlar® The premium panel for greenhouses — there is nothing else on the market to compare with it. The product is our basic Crystalite formula, a superior blend of premium resins, with an outer surface of Dupont's Tedlar polyvi- nyl fluoride film permanently bonded in place. Lasco's advanced technology has proven capable of bonding Tedlar to fiberglass without delamination problems. Essential to the bonding process is sophisticated production with precision controls and exacting and consistent formulas. We were one of the first to offer panels with Tedlar. They've stood the full test of time and are unequalled in long life and durability. CrystalCoat TM Standard A thicker, tougher layer of gel- coating protects these panels from surface fiber exposure. Based on neo- pentyl glycol (NPG) for long - lasting, flexible and durable protection against weathering. Backed by a stronger warranty than "plated" products – it's your "best buy" in many applications. Crystalite TM Standard The most economical Lasco Greenhouse Panel — yet backed by a solid 20 -year warranty that protects the grower and any subsequent owners of the greenhouse. Ideal in moderate climates, on sidewalls or anywhere that initial cost is a prime consideration. Proper maintenance and periodic refinishing provide many extra years of high -yield growth. CONFIGURATION AND SIZES The standard configuration is 2 1/2" x 1/2" (precise dimensions shown below). Panels are available in 50 1/2 ", 51 1/3" and 52 5/8" widths and in any specified lengths to 39 ft. All three widths yield a coverage of 48 ". Also available in 16" pitch, shiplap and flat rolls. --'- 2.66• 501/2" or 52%'e Recommended overlap. 2 1/2" x 1/2" corrugated. Prevailing wind 52W width 501/2" width 511/3-width Note: Overlaps shown will provide best protection against leakage and air infiltration. To assure exposure of weather - protected surfaces, install panels with labelled side out. Do not remove labels until installation is completed. When cutting panels, be sure to mark labelled side of cut -offs. SPECIFICATIONS Light and solar energy transmission. The following data is derived from testing in accordance with appropriate ANSI/ASTM Standards: Light Transmission — D 1494, Solar Energy Transmission —E424 (Method B), subject to stated tolerances. Crystalite -T Cr'stalCoat Crystalite Standard • o� °� �\s `�� Sod Ito • 2N f'.'iat;::w..:.Y .�'. ^.:r t�. 4.':.ain� fi'+�►Z+..✓ ..1':•:' P Attention, growers of foliage, orchids and tropical plants: Panels also available with approx. 20% (Orchid White) or 409; (Shade White) shading. Maximum allowable spans for uniform loading. The following table shows maximum allowable spans for uniformly distributed loads , on corrugated panels when fastened as recommended, based on two or more continuous spans (three or more purlins), including a 2.5 safety factor. 2 1/2" x 1/2" ON° 2V 4 oz.. f s S. \5V • �oQs tO" 48": • 42 ". 36" 32" Notes: 1. Table is based on section properties or actual load tests. 2. Roofing spans: Safety factor is 2.5: maximum deflection is L/45. 3. Design loads are governed by local building codes. Consult code authorities for specific load and stress requirements. 4. The above information is provided as preliminary data for design- ers. It should be checked and verified and its use determined by a dul licensed engineer or architect. Under no condition should a panel be allowed to support a person's weight. F GATORSHIELD'' vS. WEIGILT /STRENGTH COIrIPARISON, SCHEDULE 40 Plc E Allied's 50/55® significantly outperforms galvanized Schedule 40 pipe, gauge for gauge, in every way... and weighs at least 31% less (OD /OD) in popular pipe sizes. I ct', compare the results of documented tests: Galvanized Schedule 40 Pipe (ASTM -A -53) Allied's 50/55 with Gatorshield 35,300 psi pulling force- Pipe begins to yield Unchanged 56,200 psi pulling force- Pipe fractures Unchanged 58,840 psi pulling force - Tube begins to yield .LLIEDS 50/55® Galvanized Schedule 40 (AS'IM -A- 3) Allied guarantees minimum yield strength of 50,000 psi... 55,000 tensile strength (fracture point). Yet the test results show that Allied's 50/550 with Gatorshield0 yield point was 17% greater than the guaranteed minimum. The galvanized Schedule 40 pipe, however, fractured at 56,200 psi pulling force. And when compared with aluminum pipe, 50/55's superior strength characteristics are even more dramatic, with an average 60% greater load carrying capacity in tension. Plus Gatorshield offers the added benefits of easier, more reliable welding, increased structural rigidity, greater impact resistance and substantially lower material cost than with aluminum Schedule 40 pipe. 50/55® WITH CATORSIII1• :1.1)09 . Pipe Pipe Size OD Nominal Will Lbs./ Weight Inches Inches Wall Range 11. Savings Minimum Yield Tensile 1 .840 .072 (.815) 50.000 .066- .591 30.6% psi Yield .075 55,000 psi 1 ensile 1.050 y, (1.029) .083 .075- .085 .857 32.0% 1 1.315 .083 085 1.092 35.0% 11/4 1.660 .083 .085 1.398 38.596 11/4 1.900 .095 .097 1.831 32.6% 2 2.375 .095 .097 2.313 36.7% 21 2.875 .120 .1122 3.531 39.196 GALVANIZED SC :HI' DIII.E 40 ASTM -A -53 1'11'1: Pipe Sirs lathes Pips OD Nominal Inches Will Lbs./ Ft. tb .840 .109 .851 Minimum Yield Tensile 30.000 psi Yield 48,000 psi Tensile 1/4 1.050 .113 1.131 1 1.315 .133 1.679 11/4 1.660 .140 2.273 11 1.900 .145 2.718 2 2.375 .154 3.653 21 2.875 .203 5.793 SPECIFICATIONS PHYSICAL PROPERTIES /TOLERANCES • Outside Diameter- +/- 0.010` to 1.900" OD +/- 0.015" over 1.900' OD • Wall Thickness- 10% of nominal, or +/- .010' based on end use. • Length Tolerance*- 5' -IS' - +/- y.' 16'•20' - +1 -'1 21' -27' - +/- yi• • Straightness- Maximum deviation from flat .010' per foot. STANDARD MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS • Outside Diameter -.815 up to and including 2.875 • Wall Thickness- .072' through .180' • Minimum Yield Strength- 50,000 PSI • Minimum Tensile Strength- 55,000 PSI • Minimum Elongation- 23% in 2' *Shorter and longer length tolerance parameters upon request. '. 5021 SOUTH 144TH ST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 PHONE (206) 242 -8244 FAX (206) 244 -2301 r7// FJ e�- RECEIVED JUL 2 8 1994 PUBLIC W RKS "14,1 /.( .o food ✓lr.J —E--/(7/C._ CY --7f "e"-I-A/ /22+—) )0/ lj) j, --/4 4 //7/L2 ,1 --C'"7)/(-r-7/ c k //r r/_r /fd r ` /-720 2. S2 - 6EC `1V JUL 2'8 1994 C;�.�„twtuivi 1 °Y DEVELOPMENT fR 2 8 1994 Y DEVELOPMENT g ; 3 § re a3n13J3a ■ COQflefb fl i44-7111 s-i- sote water drainage plan A F F ID A V I T KNotice of Public Hearing • Notice of Public Meeting OBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet OBoard of Appeals Agenda Packet • flPlanning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O P D I S T R I B U T I O N - hereby declare that: Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Determination of Non- significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance' and Scoping Notice. O Notice of Action OOfficial Notice 0 Other O Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project 1 4 File Number 004000-0553703 BEAVERS. DAVID O+JULI 5026146TWST,. SEATTLE'WA 004000..05607.04, VANDEEN JUDYIri 295.ScHARRIMGTON.RDL COUPVILLE:WA' 152304..90371.00 GEEHAN RICHARD' 12123'SE96TWPL:: RENTON:WA. ' 152304...904104 GEEHAN'RICHARIYA' 12123 SE 96TH PL RENTONIWA, 152304-9117-03 WHITE:ARLENELi 4814 144TH SEATTL•WA' • , * ***** * * ****** * * * it-t• * c* * * * c * * * 2..,.,_,..,<.*********************** 44** 4 2C4 BATCH;NUMBER1; Xj. COMMENTS.. CUSTOMER.NAME: 'OLIVER MUTH. 004000-0510-05 •MALICK-LENA, 4813 S144TH:ST SEATTLE WA .004000-0516-09' LARSON:MAURITZiF( 4817tS144TH.ST SEATTLE 941805 98168 • 98168 004000-0521-02. ROWERTSON,BRIAN,T+SHANNON M9D9999 4915:S0,144TWST_ SEATTLE,WAr 98168 00400070530701i ROBERTSON BRIAN M909999: 4915i50:144TH-ST- SEATTLE •WA, .98168 • '004000-0539-02- VANDEEN.ROBERTt8OGAN.JOHN 982322 2951S"HARRINGTONiRD .COUPEVILLE-WA, 98239 • . . „ . . • . . . ' ..„ , ..• , • , • • . ....• • • .• • • • • , . • • . . • . . 004000-0515-00, MALICK.LENA, 580886 .4813 S 144TH.ST, SEATTLE WA 98168 ,r11 ,00.4000-0517,08 DALTOWDAVID,ROBIN:S; 009999 +STRATFORNBETTY+PETERSON,PAULA-V .1411 SW.128TH ST. SEATTLE:WA. 98146. 004000-0522-01. ROBERTSOWBRIAN.T+SHANNON.M§09999: 4915 S0.144TH:ST SEATTLE:WA. 98168 004000-0535-06 MUTH'OLIVERAI+SHARON:M. 709999 5021,514431-1,.ST SEATTLE,WA. 98168 004000-0550-06t - SCHNEIOER-HOMESANC: 899999, 651.0 SOUTHCENTER BLVD:11.1 -SEATTLE WA. 98188 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission will be holding a work session at 6:00 p.m. and the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 8:00 p.m. on July 28, 1994 located at .6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION - 6:00 P.M. The Planning Commission will be holding a work session to discuss regional issues, vision, blocks and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 11. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0032 APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: Ebenezer Church of God, Reverend James King Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing community building to a church. 14275 Interurban Ave. S., Tukwila. III. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L94 -0038 Oliver Muth, Bonsai Northwest Design review for a new greenhouse 14427 S. 51st Ave., Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times July 15 & 22, 1994 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 A F F I D A'V:I T O P D I S T R I B U T I O N • cic-NA.Amir hereby declare that: Nyotice of Public Hearing fl Notice of Public Meeting OBoard of Packet LI Board of Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Packet • J Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Determination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice• fl Notice of Action Official Notice Other 7 Other was d to each of the following addresses on 9 Name of Project ! 4 ; C" 1l , ,• -� File Number LPN- CX -ignature City of Tukwila • John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission will be holding a work session at 6:00 p.m. and the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 8:00 p.m. on July 28, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION - 6:00 P.M. The Planning Commission will be holding a work session to discuss regional issues, vision, blocks and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. II. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 p.m. L94 -0032 Ebenezer Church of God, Reverend James King Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing community building to a church. 14275 Interurban Ave. S., Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING L94 -0038 Oliver Muth, Bonsai Northwest Design review for a new greenhouse 14427 S. 51st Ave., Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times July 15 & 22, 1994 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW � D DESIGN REVIEW CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: -BO I o y� G P)Ui J AJA114 Avo T -o as- d'f Tb "7,�F " i C 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; j or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) �t /y�27 ..S r/ �y` L /.u/sl�I� -c i So+.Ti' 1-1 C F JT�L 1 S l y�L 1, Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: ©//, fr Er— /W. /4044 Address: As ‘,J--) ,r4 sf. Phone 6 31 — 1 s' 1 g Signature: Date: * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name:`l ✓ n— i�% �� OWNER Address: e(\r7 • Z3) -44 -.Pi 4.).1 /4 9890$12-- zn ‘,7/ - /a/ e Phone: I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: /y /Y. RECEIVED 0 91994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF I RCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CRITERIA Page 2 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. . The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONS -17c2 �v/ D lw� ,4-)AV &6-247J ,.reer 8,4cX ,OJ A.0(\ --- ,o✓ Po r,s/ aC. F 374. 7L ,o,. �..'v- ,��J 115/ 1 J ,evo AID 01 _'l (rAbo CO>-'7 -r.i PL 7-F7i c) I1k-7 ?Yr N,e✓ 26-2..17.) Z41v % ' 'c-,) 4/ Pow, 0 LC- 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. •Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. ' Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building site limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: CCU L /wee. UOC- JuiM Pin'► -•t 1.J61-1,41,+ I V%r Ala C"K ' )JT /'✓6 T 1 Lrz OA) s rT-E- L-RCcc °7 Farms- --r -t FLU IT 11.12.ezrs AR .51 J-144 Aie.,.) 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- • portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of , form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. G. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: �U ileop/1 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 5 INTERURBAN SPECIAL RVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people - oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the(upe and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. ( / 3. The proposed development should provide for safe an lation. n1 nyenient on -site pedestrian circu- 4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. 5. The proposed•develo pacts. ould seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im- 6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. C u. DL Q.. . H Va L LOT S�ZLr /o L. >C (i9z7k eU /LJ6 AI?C2 i ts-rJ.JG /6 DO P(k3far &v0 3400 SP.dcc ! oy -nu P Lo k6:21 L ! G' 14-1- J 6 c - A14 L 0 4,0J -1e )424.4.iNL- Y 6IJ CL 21JC4 O X" c° f2t��/,Uov f L 1jv11M P-r-rL & arc r4.6v1) Al .D u ►vl Air P A-1/1-)t. R6�"ur e -ro g ''J s// POw L-Y1.- Gros .9A40 G✓.b ; / ;r ;v /'.L Au--c);..)‘ J-/ x-4 A1/4-7 i- $E A4,0 P ECEFVE0 :91094 ..colvtmUNITV DEVELOPMENT:: 1 4. hwww■■■•■•••••■W ■■••■••• t_ 3PrIOV 9219 03cro^JQ )'d 3 • 31 X . nio . rriz it tr4 r 1,•-•..,- 4-, . g:7- . c'S 21 • . --I t:). . • :-. L 2 7. 0 ti. IL J ti 1 vo GATORSHIELD' "' 'VS. WEIGHT /STRENGTH MPARISON SCHEDULE 40 APE AIIie'd's 50/55© significantly outperforms galvanized Schedule 40 pipe, gauge for gauge, in every way... and weighs at least 31% Tess (OD /OD) in popular pipe sizes. 1 el'. compare the results of documented tests: Galvanized Schedule 40 Pipe (ASTM -A -53) Allied's 50/55 with Gatorshield 35,300 psi pulling force- Pipe begins to yield Unchanged 56,200 psi pulling force- Pipe fractures Unchanged 58,840 psi pulling force - Tube begins to yield ALLIED'S 50/55® Galvanised Schedule 40 (ASIM -A.53) Allied guarantees minimum yield strength of 50,000 psi... 55,000 tensile strength (fracture point). Yet the test results show that Allied's 50/55. with Gatorshield• yield point was 17% greater than the guaranteed minimum. The galvanized Schedule 40 pipe, however, fractured at 56,200 psi pulling force. And when compared with aluminum pipe, 50/55'Is superior strength characteristics are even more dramatic, with an average 60% greater load carrying capacity in tension. Plus Gatorshield offers the added benefits of easier, more reliable welding, increased structural rigidity, greater impact resistance and substantially lower material cost than with aluminum Schedule 40 pipe. 50/55e WITH GATORSIlIE1,1)9 Pipe Site Inches Plpe Minimum OD Nominal Wall l.bs./ Weight Yield Inches Wall Range Ft. Saving Tensile 50,000 .066- .591 30.6% psi Yield .075 55,000 psi Tensile Si .140 .072 (.115) (1.029) .083 085 .857 32.096 1 1.315 .083 ,083 1.092 35.096 114 1.660 .083 .075- 1.398 38.5% .085 14 1.900 .095 .097 1.831 32.6% .097 2 2.373 .095 .087- 2.313 36.7% .097 204 2.175 .120 .111222- 3.531 39.1% GALVANIZED SCHEDULE 40 ASTM -A -53 Pil'F: PIP* Pipe Miakuua Wu OD Hondas! LM./ Yield lochs lachee Wan Ft. Tonne 14 .840 .109 .151 30,000 psi Yield 48,000 psi Tensile 1.050 1.315 1.660 1.900 2.375 2.875 .113 .133 .140 .145 .154 .203 1.131 1.679 2.273 2.718 3.653 . 5.793 SPECIFICATIONS PHYSICAL PROPERTIES /TOLERANCES • Outside Diameter- +/- 0.010' to 1.900' OD +1- 0.015' over 1.900" OD • Wall Thickness- 10% of nominal, or +1- .010` based on end use. • Length Tolerancee- 5'45' - + / -1/1' 16'-20' - +/- t /e' 21'- 27'- • Straightneu- Maximum deviation from Dal .010' per foot. STANDARD MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS • Outside Diameter- .815 up to and including 2.875 • Wall Thickness- .072' through .180' • Minimum Yield Strength - 50,000 PSI • Minimum Tensile Strength- 55,000 PSI • Minimum Elongation- 23% in 2' ' q ' ' *Shorter and longer length tolerance parameters upon request. ,i.`,21 0 91994 D E L.OPMENT LASCO Fiberglass Greenhouse Panels The Leader in Roofing and Sidewall Panels Greenhouses are for growing crops and producing profits. No greenhouse cover – at any price – is better than Lascolite® panels in fulfilling that basic purpose: crops and profit Lascolite greenhouse panels transmit far more light than double -layer polyethylene ... equal to glass. Crop quality, yie and profits are as much as 20% greater than under double poly. There's none of the brittleness of acrylics ... or the scratch - hazing of polycarbonates ... none of the special fittings ar extrusions required by "structured" sheets. And none of their sagging under heat, either. Add moveable thermal blankets (as recommended by leading university researchers) and you have maximum fu. efficiency, as good (or better) than any of the costly double - layered plastics. PRODUCT SELECTION Crystalite -T TM with Tedlar® The premium panel for greenhouses – there is nothing else on the market to compare with it. The product is our basic Crystalite formula, a superior blend of premium resins, with an outer surface of Dupont's Tedlar polyvi- nyl fluoride film permanently bonded in place. Lasco's advanced technology has proven capable of bonding Tedlar to fiberglass without delamination problems. Essential to the bonding process is sophisticated production with precision controls and exacting and consistent formulas. We were one of the first to offer panels with Tedlar. They've stood the full test of time and are unequalled in long life and durability. CrystalCoat TM Standard A thicker, tougher layer of gel- coating protects these panels from surface fiber exposure. Based on neo -pentyl glycol (NPG) for long - lasting, flexible and durable protection against weathering. Backed by a stronger warranty than "plated" products – it's your "best buy" in many applications. Crystalite TM Standard The most economical Lasco Greenhouse Panel – yet backed by a solid 20 -year warranty that protects the grower and any subsequent owners of the greenhouse. Ideal in moderate climates, on sidewalls or anywhere that initial cost is a prime consideration. Proper maintenance and periodic refinishing provide many extra years of high -yield growth. CONFIGURATION AND SIZES The standard configuration is 2 1/2" x 1/2" (precise dimensions shown below). Panels are available in 50 1/2", 51 1/3" and 52 5/8" widths and in any specified lengths to 39 ft. All three widths yield a coverage of 48 ". Also available in 16" pitch, shiplap and flat rolls. — +{ 2.66" 51'h" 0 Recommended overlap. 2 1/2" x 1/2" corrugated. Prevailing wind 50W2" or 524/" 525/6" width 501/2" with 511/ width Note: Overlaps shown will provide best protection against leakage and air infiltration. To assure exposure of weather - protected surfaces, install panels with labelled side out. Do not remove labels until installation is completed. When cutting panels, be sure to mark labelled side of cut -offs. SPECIFICATIONS Light and solar energy transmission. The following data is derived from testing in accordance with appropriate ANSI/ASTM Standards: Light Transmission — D 1494, Solar Energy Transmission — E424 (Method B), subject to stated tolerances. Crystalite-1 ('rvs1a1(•oa1 (' rystalite Standard N r 4 .i • Ciw-'. ..:•k� _' a:. �1f:, Y,= r�::tx:Qi..,c:.:R�::iw:ir''d?� _ cam. • 3:L ,. s c."?' 11: ?r# <1z G�ik {'1:'fN.vNS++f�Yo"tYaa �LY�,�q•,'��.: Attention, growers of foliage, orchids and tropical plants: Panels also available with approx. 20% (Orchid White) or 40% (Shade White) shading. Maximum allowable spans for uniform loading. The following table shows maximum allowable spans for uniformly distributed loads , on corrugated panels when fastened as recommended, based on two or more continuous spans (three or more purlins), including a 2.5 safety factor. sttle 9 1 /2" x L.)" 4oz. '1 ', to Notes: 1. Table is based on section properties or actual load tests. 2. Roofing spans: Safety factor is 2.5: maximum deflection is 1./45. 3. Design loads are governed by local building codes. Consult code authorities for specific load and stress requirements. 4. The above information is provided as preliminary data for design- ers. It should be checked and verified and its use determined by a duly licensed engineer or architect. Under no condition should a panel be allowed to support a person's weight. GREENHOUSES MANUFACTURED BY IVAN & LYNNE SCHUENING AND SONS Our Quonset Greenhouse is also a multi -use greenhouse. It may be used as a propaga- tion house, growing house, wintering house, etc. This model has come through sus- tained winds of 90 mph without damage. t Our Quonset Greenhouses are built with the center perlins on top of the bows to stop poly sag and wear and help the greenhouses more easily shed rain and snow. In addi- tion to Poly and Shade Cloth, this structure can also be covered with Fiberglas. tWhen assembled correctly. \ CO".1.97R.VQ7 , ' D' 6 F- 2r'WtbjH (.rvc4-1 As Ova S J 20 to 40' wide "Covering Nurseries Throughout the West" Oregon Valley Greenhouses, Inc. 20357 Hwy 99E • Aurora, Oregon 97002 (503) 678 -2700 1- 800 -347 -2701 (outside Oregon) uonset — 30 to 40 ft.omi BOWS: 1%8" steelpipe, .072 or .095 ga; Stress rating: 55,000 psi; 5' or 6' centers per need (4' for Fiberglas); Secured with 1' x 1 %" sleeve, .072 ga. SIDEWALLS: 3 ft. PERLINS: 3 rows, 13/8" pipe, .065 ga. LEGS: 5' x 2%" steel pipe, .110 ga. END BRACES: 4 @ 21' x 1%" pipe, .065 ga. Hardware and complete instructions for assembly included. Though lumber for end framing and sideboards is supplied by the customer, pre -fab steel end walls are available from the manufacturer. COVERS * available in Poly (40' x 100' ground to ground or 48' x 100' with sidewall), Shade Cloth (46' x 100' ground to ground) or Fiberglas in corrugated or flats. •Covers extra. i-• PERLIN 0 End 8ne6 4' _ "\` P£RLN � �2., t, W000 11I (L 1( U U U U •i•_ e' —.4.- Cr -...{.- e' --I-- e' -.I 46-.2,6 W000