HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L94-0053 - BOEING - UNDERGROUND TANK SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ,
•
L94 -0053
BOEING UNDERGROUND
8700 E. MARGINAL WY S
TANK REMOVAL
SEPA
1. 0 14-1 +1't
eole
.Ex i s-1'; nd, Prop e /iLy
eat a
Peof osJ lof L ;■e.s
Existing Description
Lots 17 -26, inclusive, Block 8, Pottery Works
Add. To the City of Seattle, V5/P86
Except that portion Tying within Transmission Line Easement as
Disclosed by City of Seattle Ordinance No. 82986
Consolidation Description
Consolidated Lot 26 - inclusive of old Tots 26 through 22, then
Lots 21 through 17, inclusive, with lot lines remaining unchanged.
Block 8, Pottery Works Add. To the City of Seattle, V5/P86
Except that portion lying within Transmission Line Easement as
Disclosed by City of Seattle Ordinance No. 82986
Li-16s -Lv C. I1 e. MO&
MOO 111•w ors OM r•NI
Stu, /e: /411— io
Il
City of Tukwila
• John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director
August 12, 1994
Sid Browne
Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3999, M/S 19 -38
Seattle, WA 98124 -2207
RE: L94 -0054 (Shoreline Management Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) and L94 -0053 (SEPA) for
Underground Tank Removal at 8700 E. Marginal Way South.
Dear Mr. Browne,
Per our earlier discussions, I have reviewed'this project with
Jack Pace and find the following:
1. The proposed action consists of removal of an underground
oil tank and oil /water separator, removal and replacement of
1,200 cu. yds. of contaminated soil and a storm drain line,
and.a temporary shoring system for adjacent structures
during construction. Work is being done in coordination
with an EPA remediation plan.
2. The tank contains 9,000 gals., which is less than the SEPA
exempt level of 10,000 gallons.
3. Underground tank removal, if consistent with the Shoreline
Master Plan, can be considered a maintenance action which is
exempt from Shoreline Permit requirements per WAC 173-14 -
040(b) (Mark, DOE Shorelines, 8/18/93).
4. The specific tank removal has been found to be consistent
with the site's Shoreline Master Plan policies.
Based on the above findings, the Planning Division determines
that the proposed action is exempt from both SEPA and Shoreline
Permit requirements. Your application fee is herewith returned.
Please contact Vernon Umetsu at 431 -3684 if we can be of further
help.
Si c- ely,
Vernon Umetsu
Associate Planner.
cc:Bradshaw
file :94 \L94 -0053
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Sulte #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
.,
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
Kim Crangi, Finance
Sylvia A. Osby, Permit Center
August 30, 1994
Refund (Permit #L94 -0053 & #L94 -0054)
Please refund $875.00 to The Boeing Company.
cancelled prior to the start of construction
Director is authorizing a refund of the total
original- transaction was July 13, 1994, Receipt
$325.00 & $550.00.
John W. Rants, Mayor
Rick Beeler, Director
The permit was
and the Planning
permit fees. The
#3598 & #3597 for
Please return the check to me and I will forward to the applicant.
Thank You!
8/5014.
Date
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 Fax (206) 4313665
O O O O
0 0 0 0 E51,1
•
• in { �•• • •• CD ■13
0.1 NI C11
* I••-• -lc ,-1 -k
* 1-4 4: IibJ— 4:
* in * .,
.. 3 *
* .Z' * • -lc
. ¢ is ■C1 of •• -K
4: = * tt -p -It
* .I•— * cr., a- r• •r *
.1:' n C
* * C•J CC H •1C
-lc * rt H rl *
-1; * \ 3 0 *
0 0
•= O 0
•r ■ • I
L)
Cr) CO
O- C•J C9 I
•1: * f•. = I *
* -lc 0 Li.l '4• *
* 4: r1 *
* * 0 W *
* * 0 I— 4- *
* -4: • GL O -It ••
* * 1.17 I— * r•• 0 0 0
'1 * C•JCfO4J •* -I3 000
* m W0-g C • •
* * CU U * CU L7 L•)
* 3G r E
CA A
• * a .. co :c >. to .0 )
* * a. Z * ru
* * W U7H* a-
4: - Cf1 W *
•k * I >.O * Lti
* * O..:m4 •r
-k * * .r..
* * •• •• r. ■■ .4 ...• l•"-
* 0 v
* * % G. C O * •r
* 4: J > ▪ r•
• •- cm -P -g n. to L •• to •• .CU •
* * E L rU -IC 'r' 4.3 a •I-) U
-k * CC rG -l-' * L 0 Cu E C
* * = 0 * U ¢ F-• Li.., CU «;
* * co Cn ti -k to O_ E •■
• * t''J If) • 4: CU W r >. tG
* • OD 0 W -IC O CO it K CO
4: * 00 X-lc .N O_
* * 0 t 0 0* O
* * 0Tr0W*
3 -. r-
* * 'c- CT'sr -.T-4:
* Q it c . ._ co. -lc cc
-3:
* • * L O C O -k r0
* CC * [U z O O * -la
* .,I * .t7 r -C * CU 0
* H * E •V -V 4.) * •t� r 1 F-
A
000/345.83
)
Control No. (pq—cog3
Epic File No.
Fee $325.00 Receipt o. S 9
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Oil /Water Separator Removal and Soil Remediation
2. Name of applicant:
The Boeing Company
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Sid Browne, P. 0. Box 3999, M/S 19 -38, Seattle WA 98124 -2207; Phone 206 -544 -9923
4. Date checklist prepared:
June 9, 1994
i
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
8. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Work at the 14 -03 project site is projected to begin September 1, 1994. Completion is projected for
November 1, 1994.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal.
Soil and ground water investigations have been completed for this project. A report will be prepared documenting
the removal of the oil /water separator and contaminated soils.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
d: word /torm/env- chk/14-03bIdglo6/1 7/94
RECD""
JUL , 2 1994
CUIVitVIUNi I'Y
DEVELOPMENT
,
10. List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Local permits from the City of Tukwila for storm drain correction and grade and fill activity.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. There are several questions later in this check list that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The Scope of Work on this project includes the removal of an existing oil /water separator and oil accumulation
tank, removal of approximately 1200 cubic yards of contaminated soils, replacement of storm drain and tie —in to
adjacent (existing) storm drain, and backfill and pavement replacement. A sheetpile shoring system will be
utilized for protection of adjacent structures.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location
of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if
known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
sites(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this check list.
Boeing, Thompson Site, 8700 E. Marginal Way So., Seattle, WA 98108. Area adjacent to the 14 -03 building.
(See attached site plan).
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan
Map as environmentally sensitive?
No.
d: word /form/env -chk/1 4- 03bldg/06/17/94
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly,
steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slop)?
None.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,
clay, sand, gravel, peat, much)? If you know the classification of
agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Below the site paving the ground consists of about 4 ft. of fill which
overlays silty sand, the alluvial material of the Duwamish River.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No. The area has been almost completely paved for 40 years.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any
filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Fill is proposed to replace any material removed during excavation of
contaminated soils and removal of the oil /water separator system.
Quantities: approximately 1200 cubic yards project. Source to be
determined, but material will be secured from licensed local sand and
grovel supplier.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so, generally describe.
No.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious
surfaces after project construction (for exarnple, asphalt or
buildings)?
Presently the site is covered 100% with asphalt and buildings. After work is
completed, asphalt that has been removed will be replaced bringing the
percentage back to 100 %.
d/ word /fonNenv -chk/14- 03bidgl06/17/94
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts
to the earth, if any:
None.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal
(i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during
construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
During construction, there will be some noise and dust from equipment in
project area.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect
your proposal? If so, generally describe.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other
impacts to air, if any:
Construction activity will be confined to daylight hours between 6:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate
vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal
streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
This project is within 200 ft. of the Duwamish Waterway.
Approximately 150 ft. at its nearest point. This waterway, in turn,
flows into Elliot Bay and Puget Sound.
d/ word /fonNenv- chW14- o3bIdg/06/14/94
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to
(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please
describe and attach available plans.
Yes. This project will be done completely within the 200 ft. wetland
area. See ottached site plan and drawing. A shoreline permit is
being applied for on this project.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and
indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate
the source of fill material.
None.
Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities, if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so,
note location on the site plan.
No. The 100 -year floor plain is within the banks at river mile 5.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials
to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and
anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
d/ word /form/env- chk/14- 03brdg/0611 3194
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged
to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities, if known.
Ground water may be taken from excavation area during removal of
the oil /water separator system. This water, because it is in the area
where hydraulic oil may be present, will be placed in temporary
holding areas and then disposed of off —site.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the
ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for
example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number
of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
This project will create no additional waste materials. Those materials
excavated will be removed from the site.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and
method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,
if know). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Currently, runoff from area is collected in catch basins that connect
to storm drain lines and discharge through existing outfalls to the
river. Except for temporary disconnection and re —route to adjacent
storm drains (approximately one week), no change or interruption to
system will occur. Runoff will be allowed to accumulate and flow to
adjacent, unaffected catch basins during the one week period that
storm drain is being re— routed.
d/ word/form/env- chk/14- 03bldg/06/1 4194
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe.
This project will not further impact area with waste material. See also
page 7, B1.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and
runoff water impacts, if any:
All excavated soils will be placed in bermed areas and covered to prevent
soils from being carried to storm sewers by runoff.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
X other types of vegetation, blackberry bushes along bank
no vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
None.
dtword/form /env- chk/14- 03b1dg/06/17/94
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
None.
5. Animals
a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other.
Waterfowl
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other.
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near
the site.
None.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Near the site in the Duwamish coho, summer — fall chinook, and chum
salmon
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
d /word/form/env -chk/14- 03bldg/06/1 3/94
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)
will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs?
Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by
adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the
plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or
control energy impacts, if any:
None.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to
toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous
waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
Yes. This project is being performed as an independent clean -up action by
the Boeing Company. Health hazards are minimal due to nature of
hydraulic oil contamination.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
Personnel working on this project will be protected per OSHA guidelines. All
wastes generated will be managed per WDOE guidelines.
d/ word /form /env- chW14- 03bldg/06/13/94 -10-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your
project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or
associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term
basis (for example: traffic, construction. operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Construction noise will be of the same type that exists as industrial
noise in area. No long term noise would be created. Construction
noise will occur during normal working hours.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if
any:
Mufflers will be used on all trucks and equipment used on the project.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Manufacturing, airport, office, and parking.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Yes. Prior to construction of the Boeing plant in 1930's.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The project site contains one large Boeing owned manufacturing buildings
(14 -01) on the west side of East Marginal Way. Further to the west, the
site is bounded by the Duwamish waterway. Several small support buildings
are also of the site. These buildings include the 14 -02, 14 -07, 14 -11,
and 14 -15.
d/ word/ form/env- chk/14- 03bIdg/06/14/94 —11-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Heavy manufacturing
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Heavy manufacturing
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program
designation of the site?
Urban.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally
sensitive" area. If so, specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
completed project?
None.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project
displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if
any:
None.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with
existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
Project is remedial in nature and will not impact any existing or protected
land uses.
d/ word /fomUenv- chk/14- 03bldg/06/13/94 -12-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing?
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not
including antennas; what is the principal exterior building
material(s) proposed?
Structure will not extend above ground level.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or
obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None.
d/ word /form/env -chW14- 03bldg/06/13/94
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time
of day would it mainly occur?
No light or glare will be produced.
b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or .
interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of Tight or glare may affect your
proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Tight and glare impacts, if
any:
None.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Boeing employees recreation facility is located in vicinity. An employees
exercise facility is located in the 2 -22 building.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational
uses? If so, describe.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,
including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or
applicant, if any:
None required.
d/ word/ formlenv- chk/14- 03bldg/O6/13/94 -14-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,
state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the
site? If so, generally describe.
None.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or
next to the site.
None known of.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site
plans, if any.
See attached site drawing.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If now, what is the
approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes. 1500 feet.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?
How many would the project eliminate?
None. None eliminated.
d /wordlfornlenv- chk/14- 03bldg/06 /13/94
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or
improvements to existing roads or streets, not including drive
ways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private).
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,
rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
Project will not impact or use water, rail, or air transportation.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated, by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would
occur.
None.
g. Proposed measure to reduce or control transportation impacts, if
any:
None.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services
(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,
schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No additional public service.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any.
None.
cUword /form/env- chk/14- 03bIdg/06/1 3194
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity,
natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer,
septic system, other.
Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on
the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
None.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its
decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
dhword /form/env- chW14- 03bIdg/06/13/94
.
LEGEND
Labs/Offices
Avionics
Mechanical
Electrical
Structural
Noise
Material
Quality assurance
Aeronautic
Office
Executive
Professional
Engineering
Training
Manufacturing
Fabrication
Sub - assembly
Final- assembly
Production manufacturing
Development manufacturing
Fllghtline
Engine testing
Paint hangar
Fueling
Existing Aircraft Road crossing
points
Note: This illustration represents uses proportionately by site and does not Include accessory uses such as parking and storage.
Figure 3 -1
EXISTING SITE JES
<E
j1,'_ 21994
iyviiv7UNITY
='-f _LOPMENT
1d101 ONV3D
A.AAAA
N 1 0
,
Q O]�P
A A
O O
U)C'fl GAO o� Ao T---I Cn-ri
w aO C) CcD m W
C QOO '
0 070 0 O
. y
CL CD
CC/1 D
V N + N
- O
V O
(71OCTOO
O O OTO CO 0 C) 0 W
O Ktt] O d
N = um
to
oo'
00
W V
CO O
O N
CO co
C.0 O
3
N N
O c.nn
V —+
.Jl W
CO O
W W W N
Na N N O
00- - .-
A A A
P C
m Om
t7
CO
c
0
!7
-4
m
T
mu,
--40
(0
■
0
-o
A
m
I c_
I0
Imm
z
2
I
I 0
dtlOO H11:1OMN3)4
0
u1 o0 •
Zo
0x
se pi,
0R^ VU
z
y
s
s
.. • ■
+BM
007- Drain B-2+
Cover
c--
To be Connected
<to Existing Oil
Water Separator
Drain
+ B-1 Covers
Drain
Cover
B-3 +
or/-- Chain Link Fence
x
• MW-1
=
B-7+
Holding
Tank
—
,.--.Approximate Limits of Remedial E
-9.-4% B-4 s
y' (1,200 cubic yards, in-situ volum
Concrete Pad
Oil/Water
Separator
Tank
B-8
RECEIVED
JUL 1 2 1994
comivium Y
DEVELOPMENT
Reference: Drawing entitled • "Oil/Water Separator — Plans & Sections, 757 Fatigue
Test Facility Building 14-03, Seattle WA." dated 03/31/94.
/ / B -4
Approximate Limits of Remedial Excavation
(1,200 cubic yards, in —situ volume)
Concrete Pad
Electric Trench
Building
lit. 1 21994
vUv; ;v;l+i, l i Y
,i=VLELOPMEN E
3, 757 Fatigue
34.
Geo
Engineers
0
Z
10
20
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION:
+ B -8 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER
• MW -1 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER
+ BM BENCHMARK, ELEVATION 1 1.4.46. FEET
E CATCH BASIN
PROPOSED SHEET PILE WALL LOCATION
— <— EXISTING STORM WATER LINE
PROPOSED STORM WATER LINE
Note:
The locations of all features shown are approximate.
FIGURE R
TEP :SMP
0120194.0WG 0120194T14:061394
'• 04141104101-
Face o' 4011 Exisf•1
/4 =OP Bai /a'fty d
Ovf;p /[iegmea/c
New C.M.V. I✓a //
3C� /:
6 " bler0. Pad For
Sub= S /&fions /4-3 S14 -4
Sew; E /ec. Durs(3•.Fc Sije
• s
o - 4-, \o
/51
4i
0
115/
See Oa
o ;r 'es
Suppor-1
(Ex,
Re/nett
.See Mee
5 di
RECEIVED
JUL 1 21994
COMMUNI tY
DEVELOPMENT
Milne .i
vE
394
it 1Y
AENT
Face of Iya /! E.r/si`•
/4 -02 Bay /d/n, d
Oil`-side Face of
C m.. U. ►Yap/
3 /5.. 361= 46.08
/908'
20/775' =35.50
20.00'
6" b' /' Fvad For.
Sub - Sfa2/t?s /43 &/4 -4
Sed. Elec. Ourgs Fo-- Sije
ii
LAbendo
-4
ti
Nsw.
W Et l
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
See Alorif �