The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L94-0070 - CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY - ADDITIONS SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.f a�.n,w.�1:•,;.: •1•CO3c'.•Y,:'aw•).:z^s,'. •: ^:`fw:w�k4;>a,a*^::"••n• • my :.,+»r'u`�'!nMSlfitrfi'(axl�elF�w ihmIVOIM IMION er...o.., L94 -0070 CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY (WITHDRAWN) • HEERY November 23, 1994 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Regarding: Dear Jack: Jack Pace SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School We have reviewed your November 9, 1994 letter regarding SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School. We concur with the comments stated in this letter and will proceed with design using your information as parameters. It should be noted that subject to the receipt of additional information from the City, we will be extending curb, gutter and sidewalks for Cascade View along 32nd Avenue South between 135th Street and 137th Street, not 136th Street as noted in your letter. We appreicate your review and comments and will see that these elements are incorporated in the design. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, HEER NTERNATIO , INC Gary .Itz Program Ma e'er cc: Kirstine VVhisler, SCSD Nancy Kaynor, BA Mike Finnegan, HI SCSD - CV - a(H), DD SCSD - SMS - a(H), DD g: \user\publ ic\projs\scsd\corrs \0079.; Itr Heery International, Inc. A group of prolesslonal service practices 10900 NE 41h Street. Suite 1110, Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone 206.454.9703 Fax 206451.5726 ATLANTA BALTIMORE BOSTON CHARLOTTE CLEVELAND DENVER HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MEXICO CITY MIAMI NEW YORK ORLANDO PHILADELPHIA PORTLAND SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE VANCOUVER WASHINGTON DC • a. h i;^ 49,94 • Architecture Construction Management Engineering Graphic Design Interior Design Program Management Strategic Facilities Planning City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director November 3, 1994 Dr. Michael Silver, Superintendent South Central School District 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 FAX 244 -8602 RE: Cascade View Elementary School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Showalter Middle School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Dear Mr. Silver, The City has reviewed the environmental checklists and determinations noted above and has the following comments on the proposals. Cascade View Elementary SEPA DNS Prior to issuance of any permits and inconjunction with the conditional use permit, the following items will be required: 1. Storm water Drainage Permit. The applicant must describe the volume of storm water discharge, capacity of detention and provide oil /water separators where deemed necessary. 2. Utility and Street Use Permit. 3. The applicant will be required to reimburse the City for the construction cost of public street frontal improvements, including curb, gutter and Sidewalk, along 32nd Avenue between 135th St. and approximately 136th St. 4. Automatic fire sprinklers will be required by the Fire Department. 5. Additional fire hydrants will need to be installed at locations approved by the Fire Department. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • 12061 431-3670 • Fax 1206) 431-3665 Showalter Middle School. Prior to issuance of any permits, the City will require the following: 1. Any increase in storm water runoff will require retention/detention in compliance with the King County • Storm water Management Manual. The utility plans need to indicate where and how the on-site stormwater collection system will be connected to the public storm water system located in Macadam Road S. 2. Additional fire hydrants will be required. 3. •Flre alarm. and sprinkler systems are required to be installed. 4. Fire lanes are required to support 70,000 pounds. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these proposals. Sincerely, Libby Vadson Associate Planner SCHOOL DISTRICT 406 outs E9entiral KING COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 -4196 • Phone: 244 -2100 WAC 197 -11 -970 Determination of nonsignficiance (DNS). .DETERMINATIONOF .NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Proponent: Renovation and addition to Cascade View Elementary School • South Central School District No. 406 Location of proposal, including street address: 13601 32nd Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 • Lead agency: South Central School District The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by October 17 1994. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Dr. Michael Silver POSITION / TITLE: Superintendent ADDRESS: 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Date: disk t-'1 \docs \cascade.dns Control No Epic File No Fce $325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascade View Elementary School 2. Namc of applicant: South Central School District 3. Address and Rhone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: IGrstine Whirler 4640 South 144 th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Contact: Nancy Kaynor Bassetri Architects 1011 Western Avenue #701 Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1994 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned to start in April 1995. The nwderization and new addition of the school is scheduled for use in the fall of 1996. The construction will be phased. New construction to be completed first, than modernization. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is unknown at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about chat has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Topographical Survey by Penhallegon Associates, Consulting Engineers, May 25, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Determination Conditional Use Permit(CUP) approval Design Review Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including thc proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do nor need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of thc objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. wp005.scstamd 3 print data. August 17, 1994 October 24,1994 Gary Goltz Berry International, Inc. 10900 NE 4th Street, Suite 1110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: SEPA Determinations for Showalter Middle School and Cascade View Elementary School. I appreciate you forwarding the SEPA determinations for the schools which the City had not previously received. We received the two Determinations of Nonsignificance's on October 19, 1994. As discussed on the phone today, the School District, as lead agency, has extended the comment period to November 2, 1994. Because the City is not the lead agency but rather an agency of jurisdiction, the. City is required to be notified by the lead agency upon SEPA determination. I will forward the SEPA comments as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Libby Hudson Associate Planner C: South Central School District Bob Betts PER' . - .LET ENGI EEL INC . Civil and Transportation Consultants 2828 Colby Avenue, Suite 410 Everett, WA 98201 September 28, 1994 Mr. Ron Cameron, P.E. City Engineer City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Associate Planner Department of Community Development Planning 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Heery International, Inc. Received . SCr'291994 (206) 252 -7233 FAX: 339 -6018 RE: Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School Traffic Impact Study Dear Ron and Vernon: I received a call from Ralph Rohwer with Heery International Inc. who is working for the South Central School District on the remodel and additions to the above referenced schools. He informed me that the staff from Tukwila Planning has stated in their review of the traffic impact analysis that they have found the study to be incomplete. I have reviewed my notes in our project file and found that, based on phone conversations with you, existing and future parking demands during the day and the evening were of major concern. Traffic flows were not identified as a potential problem. Therefore, the study focused on existing parking and future parking increases which could resulttfrom the proposed projects. Parking surveys were made, future trip increases identified, andtparking impacts identified based on input from the School District and our limited survey of on and off street parking at these two locations. Showalter Middle School was estimated to have 108 additional vehicular staff trips and Cascade View Elementary School did not anticipate any increase in staff or student trips. Traffic level -of- service analyses were not made. School trips do not coincide with peak trips. The reports were then submitted to the City. Vb ,,.SG), 170 OCT -13 -1994 10:15 FRO .Page 2 Seca Central School District Letter •Septaaber 28, 1994 TO • 3409519 • Please let me know if I misinterpreted our comma= or if you need • additional ialbemstkoo for the traffic study. I can be reached at 232.7233. Sincerely, PBRTEBT ENGINEERING, INC. Dorald H. Cur, P.B. Ameba ex: Ralph Rohasr • MEMO TO: Finance Department Attn: Richard Takechi FROM: Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner 1:7 DATE: August 31, 1994 SUBJECT: Permit Fee Refund Please refund the South Central School District $650.00 for fees for two SEPA Checklists (@ $325 each: L94-0070 and L94-0073). Checklists were mistakenly provided to DCD, however, SEPA Determinations for school district projects are made by the school district acting as lead agency. Please notify me if you have any questions. The refund should be made out to: South Central School District Mail to: South Central School District Attention: Kirstine Whisler ' 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 Thank you. RECEIVED AUG 181994 CLMVUviu►v► rY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No Epic File No L'16/- " 0 a 777 Fee $325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascade View Elementary School 2. Name of applicant: South Central School District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Kirstine Whirler 4640 South 144 th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Contact: Nancy Kaynor Bassetti Architects 1011 Western Avenue #701 Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1994 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned to start in April 1995. The moderization and new addition of the school is scheduled for use in the fall of 1996 The construction will be phased. New construction to be completed first, than modernization. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is unknown at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Topographical Survey by Penhallegon Associates, Consulting Engineers, May 25, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Determination Conditional Use Permit(CUP) approval Design Review Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. wp005.scs/amd 3 print date. August 17. 1994 The project is a moderization and addition to an existing elementary school. The completed project will meet the current and projected program needs for 400 kindergarten through fifth grade students. The project includes: Lot area: 8.93 acres Building coverage: 29,689 S.F. existing 2Z782 S.F. proposed 57,471 S.F. total New car and bus driveways Increased parking areas Repair to existing grass athletic fields Playgrounds Landscaping and irrigation 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project., including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descriptio, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address : Parcel 734660 -0024. The site is locates at 13601 32nd Ave.S., Tukwila, WA. Exhibit A is a vicinity map showing the site. The legal description is exhibit B. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The area of expansion is rolling in terrain. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, spccify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is characterized as three subsurface units. 1.) Fill - about 2' thick, highly moisture sensitive and low strength & moderate compressibility. 2.) Weathered Till - 2'-4' of loose to medium dense silty sand d- stif sandy silt. 3.) Till- dense to very dense silty fine to coarse grained sand w/ some gravelly fine to coarse grained sand w /some cobbles. wp005.scs/amd 4 print date: August 17. 1994 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no history of unstable soils on the site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be grading necessary for the new addition and paved areas. It is estimated that there will be 7,110 cy. of cut and 55 c.y. of fill need for this project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Short term increase in potential for on site erosion is always possible during site preparation & development activity. Yes, erosion could occur especially in regraded area west of the new building addition. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaccs after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing impervious area is approximately 83,292 SF (1.91 acres) acres. The new addition and paved parking areas will have 58,119 SF (1.33 acres) acres of impervious surface. The impervious area for the total site is 141,411 SF (3.25 acres), or 36.4%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Prior to site work a grading permit shall have been obtained for any on -site grading which is not exempted by section 7003 UBC. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESCP) shall have been submitted and approved. g. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short term emissions and odors would be from construction equipment and site preparation. These impacts would be minimal; There will be no significant long -term impacts. The main generator of emissions is from vehicles coming to, and from the school. Automobile emissions consists mainly of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. There will be a minimal increase in traffic to the site. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The main off-site sources of emissions are from automobiles travelling along the adjacent roadways. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils and washing truck wheels before they leave the site. wp005.scs/amd 5 print date: August 17, 1994 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if' known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. wp005.scs/amd 6 print date: August 17, 1994 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The rate and volume of storm water runoff will increase for those previously undeveloped areas. The runoff will be directed to existing drainage and improved facilities. The storm drainage detention volume will be 309 LF S' pipe (± 6,000 cu. ft.) 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There could be oils, grease and other pollutants from the additional paved areas that could enter the ground through runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control surface runoff during construction and after development (as required by the city). The existing storm drainage system will be modified to accept the new drainage system. No open space ponding is proposed and all detention will be contained in underground pipe or vault systems. Run off is collected in storm drain system piped to a detention pipe. Once water leaves detention system it enters a 130' bio- filtration swale, then goes off-site into a side road ditch system. Construction impacts could be minimized by the Plowing: - schedule construction during the drier months of the year. -provide temporary cover for any exposed areas: and -keep runoff velocities low. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _,.x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _it__ shrubs _x_ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other type of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing trees will be removed for new building and driveway construciton. Some existing dying Madrona trees will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. wp005.scs/amd 7 print date. August 17, 1994 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There will be additional landscaping provided along the perimeter of the site and new paved areas. The existing areas near the buildings will be enhanced and upgraded with a comprehensive landscape plan. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. squirrels, small rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposcd measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Due to the existence of the school, there is no quality wildlife habitat on the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. All sources of energy are available to the site. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The requirements of the Uniform Building Code will be satisfied in the construction of the new additions and substantial remodels. Energy conservative materials are encourage in all new construction. An Energy Conservation Report has been prepared by Hargis Engineers comparing INAC Systems with respect to thier lift cycle costs. wp005.scs/amd 8 print date: August 17, 1994 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This project will not generate any environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tukwilla Fire Department and Police Department respond to emergency situations. The South Central School District implements a safety and emergency program Jr o students and staff' 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are no known health hazards that would occur as a result of further site development. Any pesticides used in the maintenance of the school grounds will be properly handled by qualified personnel. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main noise source in the immediate area is from traffic along adjacent streets and surrounding land uses. Significant noise is generated by aircraft to and from SeaTac Airport. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short -term noise impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Site noise would be generated on average with in the hours of 7 ::30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. At 200 feet from construction, Leq would be approximately as fellows: Activity Leq (in decibels2 Clearing 71 -71 Excavation 59 -77 Foundations 65 Building Erection 60 -72 Finishing 62 -77 Long term noise impacts will be those associated with the use of the site fir additional classroom space. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The following mitigation measures would reduce the construction impact: 1. Construction equipment should be equipped with muffler devices 2. Locate noisy operations away from noise sensitive areas when possible. wp005.scs/amd 9 print date: August 17, 1994 3. Shut -off of idling equipment. 4. Schedule noisiest operations for the middle of the day. done during daytime hours 5. Schedule noisy operations so they are not concurrent. On-going noise impacts fromaircraft will be mitigated in construction systems abd acoustical materials. Building construction will be the buildings through 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is used for a school with residential uses surrounding the site. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Cascade View Elementary currently exists on the site. The facility consist of 4 school buildings, a covered play area and two portable buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? There are no plans to demolish any of the existing permanent buildings. The portables will be removed from the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R -1 -7.2 Single Family Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? "Low Density Residential" If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The renovated school will accommodate 400 students. The staff will remain at 45 full time and 10 part time people. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There will be no displacement. The existing students and staff will remain at this school. g. wp005.scs/amd 10 print date: August 17, 1994 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The new classroom space is needed to meet the current enrollment for the district. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A school facility is allowed as a conditional use in the R Zone. Conditional use requires special review to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with uses allowed in the same zone. The • new school will allow additional classrooms to house the existing and projected enrollment fir Cascade View Elementary School. This will be a state -of -the -art school which will allow the District to provide special programs that currently are unable to be housed in the existing school facility. The site can be adequately served by utilities. There are provisions for adequate parking, access and circulation. There will be a minimal increase in traffic and noise as a result of the expansion. The new school will generally be compatible with the existing buildings in height and exterior appearance. There should be minimal impacts to the surrounding residential community. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no housing impacts. School expansion is necessary to meet student population that exists in the school service boundary. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure will be the ridge line of the new gymnasium at 32' above the ground. The principal building materials will be brick and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views across the back of the site will be altered by the new addition. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will contain formal landscaping/ planting areas. All landscaping will be planted prior to project completion unless authorized by the planning department. A detailed landscaping plan will be submitted with the building construction plans. wp005.scs/amd 11 print date•. August 17, 1994 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare that is produced from the site will be from building lighting and exterior lighting. Also, light will be produced from vehicle headlights. This will be minimal due to the limited usage of the school during the nighttime hours. There will be security lighting during this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Main off-site sources of light and glare are from vehicles using adjacent streets and the surrounding land uses. d. Proposed measures to reduce of control light and glare impacts, if any: The new security and parking lighting will be properly screened from public right of ways and surrounding residential uses. Classroom usage is mainly during daytime hours with minimal building lighting during the evening hours. Any additional lighting will be shielded as to not increase the ambient light level to an unacceptable level. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The existing school does provide a play ground and athletic fields on the site. There will be a new play ground and play structure as part of the school facility. The athletic fields will remain as existing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: School recreation opportunities are already provided on the site. There will be additional recreational facilities provided. The community can use these facilities afar school hours. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. wp005.scs/amd 12 print date: August. 17, 1994 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None, there are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation office will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main access to the site is from 32nd Ave S The existing site access will remain. The closest highway is Pacific Highway S. (route 99). b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The school presently has 84 parking spaces. The completed project will have 90 total parking spaces for the school facility, 53 permanent, 11 drop -off, and 9 street. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private. Frontage improvements will be provided as required by City of Tukwila. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is not anticipated that there will be an increase in the volume of vehicular trips per day to the school. Ther are 45 trips per staff, 60 trips per student drop -offs, and approximately 150 students are bused per day. The peak volumes occur at 9:00a.m. and 3:00 p.m. g. wp005.scs/amd Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking and a new fire lane. Separation of bus and car driveways will greatly enhance site access safety. 13 print date: August 17, 1994 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, the number of staff 6. students are not increasing. The area is presently served by the Tukwila Fire Department and Police Department. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The use offire alarms and safety equipment could aid in decreasing the number offire calls. Also, proper internal circulation will assure adequate access and turn radii Jr o emergency vehicles. Fire hydrant placement and fire flow requirements will be satisfied. A fire lane is to be provided throughout the site. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through proper extension of services. Extension of utilities is the District's responsibility. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing energy sources are supplied by the city of Tukwilla and Washington Natural Gas. The telephone service will be provided by Water and sewer service will be provided to the site by the City of Tukwila. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature. /t'1 � /4-P i Tg-s, o 4- ffc.IcgNr Nancy Kaynor, $assetti Architects P.S., for the Applicant Date Submitted. Augucr 1$, 19_94 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE wp005.scs/arnd 14 print date: August 17. 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EXHIBIT- A CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL South 9entiral SCHOOL DISTRICT 406 KING COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 14401 STREET • SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98168 Phone: 244.2100 SCALE IN STATUTE MILES 'ALE y1 Vt N 0 COPYRIGHT KROLL MAP COMPANY. INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ' EXHIBIT B CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RE CO RO [LEE1g AL LSE RIP 5r IO PARCEL A: THE EAST 39.63 FT. OF LOT 1 AND THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOTS 3,4,5 AND 6, BLK 2, RIVERTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOL. 11 OF PLATS, PG. 100, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 16, TWP. 23 NORTH, R. 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNT`.', WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 89'52'59" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SE 1/4 30.01 FT. TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 30 FT. OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89'52'59" WEST 519.63 FT. TO THE SW CORNER OF THE EAST 39.63 FT. OF LOT 1, BLK 2, RIVERTON ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO. THE PLAT THEREOF; RECORDED IN VOL. 11 OF PLATS, PG. 100, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 0'13'20" EAST 91.91 FT.; THENCE SOUTH 2'31'50" EAST 89.97 FT.; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF JORGENSEN'S ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOL. 53 OF PLATS, PG. 71, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SOUTH 89 '01'46" WEST 55.07 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 89'01'46" EAST 55.07 FT TO SAID NORTHWEST CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 0'58'14" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PLAT 194.75 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 2'51'51" WEST 69.68 FT.; THENCE SOUTH 1'40'11" WEST 104 FT., MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 89'42'02" WEST FROM A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 89 '42'02" EAST 472.20 FT. MORE OR LESS, TO SAID EAST LINE; THENCE NORTH 1'40'11" EAST ALONG SAID LINE 176.24 FT. TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 487 FT. OF SAID SUBDIVISION, BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF 32ND AVENUE SOUTH AS CONVEYED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3410478; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 30 FT. OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1'40'11" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 72.13 FT., MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 137TH STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID JORGENSEN'S ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH 89'01'46" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 120 FT.; THENCE NORTH 1'40'11" EAST 240.32 FT.; • THENCE NORTH 89'31'00" EAST 120 FT. TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 1'40'11" WEST 177.27 FEET, MORE OR L ESS, FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1'40'11" EAST 177.27 FT., MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. aaaaaaaaaa a J 0 0 Z 0 CO CC w w J W W W 0 CD 0 Sm. M •mm-um •aut lun7nauo3 sararaolcay trofaimur:f 1001136 46Y183"713 lalA 303S" llumma•cm ••■••.,ftm mans otliesoodoi 4V ta/oLa ..n.rmrsm3 'CIS '11/21.1.N30 HMOS 0011,9b6 r : —"CP" I 'la ;14 _ " 1191nr m 01 WI MOM illi •71 1"eryi 30M giWgi !ifii? 1;1110 V, VVV41 IfIXiii 1 : .,,I i* . ir gi I 1 I.!, • ' g Ievx: xi' : Alli z ;! i fpiri 11 I! ;le! 4, rile; ! Illat/ ; MI6 1 11 !I 1r, 111-1-1.1"4.1Nliiiyfte MT flishlitlillaillillill S. 135TH ST. .--1.1114111A , e • • • es S. 1136TH ST. 1; S. 137TH ST. 11 t; la 1 1 t Ili gii? ti ii i-4/1(li Vw tit !ligiil 11 1 slit flit ill i 1 !II 6 6"1"1 ..:..t.e.i..Noo • !IZI 110114,ui . e 1. PC1 :pat :at iftql Ito pi oil gal phi limito oil phi qpi 43 IT' elf 1. 1? 4440144414 • •• • • ••• • 1.1•1 I 1 \ H VI /di 1E11 111111-4 011111 Nil 1!' 1111111111' •1•14•144•1444 , • 7..i. J/ , -4:.:-.,:_, --.l.,..:.:. ..;:..., c..:: ,..._., / ' / — 7, . --.. tit/ / . - ., , I 1 . % -----.z. .;—/,If .....: ‘.‘..., I • 4.' Ni ..,.. ///// 1,1,,,,,,t)p • ..// /, ..,, `;:--<',ii . ' /1, /4 : .: i•dti Iii / / '.t . 1 • t ,: ..,-- k..._ ‘......_ ‘,..... // "'-:::::: ---- 22 ------------------------------------- ---.. --... .. -- '''.----- rf-1 L. I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 4444444444 -1 ,LJ 0,0:400,0%."°,M10=013Maknici.47.0.9,N=0.111109.!C11115.\MniatIll'ai0 fErCITiii, ii.7,4■Cluyt" ‘,41 4) 461, 1 t!!!W, Hkkkk 11111 lj Wit 'Lill 1 1 1 • •• 1 ; !,1 ;Id 11141111111111111 .16 PI ®®® 0 e. / I 'a V PO iv Fri ifo oil il!' ,liP -tog el? 44444441<K 4: < o °- HI pi tD 14; ir I it! 11*,%/' ••••-% S. 1351'11 ST. 7 _ - 0 IMHZ 156TH 5T. 8 Vc7:7,: 5 t E.•/: r .. ... 132N0 AVE. 5. 131TH ST. 8101 r E ortif 0 ell !Ai kill Eh ) IA 1,11i 11 al.12 9! of <14.1.11,14.1<<K1 4.14.4 42. r 11 MIA WT. CS 042.1■211•71•1210110,1 \ \-11- 1-= ED t:t —J 112 in r1 -7- 9 HIM 1=1 11111111 1 11111111 mumi 11'1. 11111111 • 4 J 4 = 1 2 F, I. 1 1 1 I g elel<144.11<1‹<K1 1 1=1 11-1 4111 A El �.l N-i l la I) b n <KKKK iaa 1<1 d .0142 igh 411 aa(i a 6 2 9 € 0 all z d 0 tit EAST ELEV ^1I01.1 0 W RECEIVED Ate, 181994 CU►vuvi)wi iv DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No Epic File No L/6/-- 6/v 120 ?D Fee $325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascade.: View Elementary School :>' 2. Name of applicant: South Central School District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Kirstine Whirler 4640 South 144 th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Contact: Nancy Kaynor Bassetti Architects 1011 Western Avenue #701 Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1994 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned to start in April 1995. The moderization and new addition of the school is scheduled fir use in the fall of 1996 The construction will be phased. New construction to be completed first, than modernization. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is unknown at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Topographical Survey by Penhallegon Associates, Consulting Engineers, May 25, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Determination Conditional Use Permit(CUP) approval Design Review Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. wp005.salamd 3 print date. .August 17, 1994 The project is a moderization and addition to an existing elementary school. The completed project will meet the current and projected program needs for 400 kindergarten through fifth grade students. The project includes: Lot area: 8.93 acres Building coverage: 29,689 S.F. existing 2Z782 S.F. proposed 5Z471 S.F. total New car and bus driveways Increased parking areas Repair to existing grass athletic fields Playgrounds Landscaping and irrigation 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project., including a street address, if any,' and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a rangc of arca, provide thc range or boundaries of thc site(s). Provide a legal descriptio, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address : Parcel 734660 -0024. The site is locates at 13601 32nd Ave.S., Tukwila, WA. Exhibit A is a vicinity map showing the site. The legal description is exhibit B. 13. Does the proposal lie within an arca designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The area of expansion is rolling in terrain. b. What is the steepest slope on thc site (approximate percent slope)? 4096 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is characterized as three subsurface units. I.) Fill - about 2' thick, highly moisture sensitive and low strength d moderate compressibility. 2.) Weathered Till - 2=4' of loose to medium dense silty sand c stiff sandy silt. 3.) Till- dense to very dense silty fine to coarse grained sand w/ some gravelly fine to coarse grained sand w /some cobbles. wp005.scs/amd 4 print date: August 17, 1994 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no history of unstable soils on the site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be grading necessary for the new addition and paved areas. It is estimated that there will be Z110 c.y. of cut and 55 c.y. of fill need for this project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Short term increase in potential for on site erosion is always possible during site preparation & development activity. Yes, erosion could occur especially in regraded area west of the new building addition. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing impervious area is approximately 83,292 SF (1.91 acres) acres. The new addition and paved parking areas will have 58,119 SF (1.33 acres) acres of impervious surface. The impervious area for the total site is 141,411 SF (3.25 acres), or 36.4%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or othcr impacts to the earth, if any: Prior to site work a grading permit shall have been obtained for any on -site grading which is , not exempted by section 7003 UBC. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESCP) shall have been submitted and approved. g. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short term emissions and odors would be from construction equipment and site preparation. These impacts would be minimal. There will be no significant long -term impacts. The main generator of emissions is from vehicles corning to and from the school. Automobile emissions consists mainly of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. There will be a minimal increase in traffic to the site. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The main off -site sources of emissions are from automobiles travelling along the adjacent roadways. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils and washing truck wheels before they leave the site. wp005.scslamd 5 print date: August 17, 1994 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, thc number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans thc system(s) arc expected to serve. None. wp005.ses/amd G print date: August 17, 1994 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The rate and volume of storm water runoff will increase for those previously undeveloped areas. The runoff will be directed to existing drainage and improved facilities The storm drainage detention volume will be 309 LF 5' pipe (.t 6,000 cu. ft.) 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There could be oils, grease and other pollutants from the additional paved areas that could enter the ground through runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control surface runoff during construction and after development (as required by the city). The existing storm drainage system will be modified to accept the new drainage system. No open space ponding is proposed and all detention will be contained in underground pipe or vault systems. Run off is collected in storm drain system piped to a detention pipe. Once water leaves detention system it enters a 130' bio- filtration swale, then goes off -site into a side road ditch system. Construction impacts could be minimized by the following: - schedule construction during the drier months of the year. -provide temporary cover for any exposed areas: and -keep runoff velocities low. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _x_ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other type of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing trees will be removed for new building and driveway corutruciton. Some existing dying Madrona trees will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. wp005.scs/amd 7 print date: August 17, 1994 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There will be additional landscaping provided along the perimeter of the site and new paved areas. The existing areas near the buildings will be enhanced and upgraded with a comprehensive landscape plan. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. squirrels, small rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Due to the existence of the school, there is no quality wildlife habitat on the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. All sources of energy are available to the site. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. wpoo5.scs/amd No. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The requirements of the Uniform Building Code will be satisfied in the construction of the new additions and substantial remodels. Energy conservative materials are encourage in all new construction. An Energy Conservation Report has been prepared by Hargis Engineers comparing HVAC Systems with respect to thier life cycle costs. 8 print date: August 17, 1994 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This project will not generate any environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tukwilla Fire Department and Police Department respond to emergency situations. The South Central School District implements a safety and emergency program fir students and staff. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are no known health hazards that would occur as a result of further site development. Any pesticides used in the maintenance of the school grounds will be properly handled by qualified personnel. b. Noise wp005.scs/amd 1) What typcs of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main noise source in the immediate area is from traffic along adjacent streets and surrounding land uses. Significant noise is generated by aircraft to and from SeaTac Airport. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short -term noise impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Site noise would be generated on average with in the hours of 7 : :30 a.m. until 4::00 p.m. At 200 feet from construction, Leq would be approximately as follows: /activity Leq (in decibels) Clearing 71 -71 Excavation 59 -77 Foundations 65 Building Erection 60 -72 Finishing 62 -77 Long term noise impacts will be those associated with the use of the site for additional classroom space. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The following mitigation measures would reduce the construction impact: 1. Construction equipment should be equipped with muffler devices 2. Locate noisy operations away from noise sensitive areas when possible. 9 print date: August 17. 1994 3. Shut -off of idling equipment. 4. Schedule noisiest operations for the middle of the day. done during daytime hours 5. Schedule noisy operations so they are not concurrent. On-going noise impacts fromaircraft will be mitigated in construction systems abd acoustical materials. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. Building construction will be the buildings through What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is used for a school with residential uses surrounding the site. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Cascade View Elementary currently exists on the site. The facility consist of 4 school buildings, a covered play area and two portable buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? _ There are no plans to demolish any of the existing permanent buildings. The portables will be removed from the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R -1 -72 Single Family Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? "Low Density Residential" If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, speci No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The renovated school will accommodate 400 students. The staff will remain at 45 full time and 10 part time people. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There will be no displacement. The existing students and staff will remain at this school. g. J• wp005.scs/amd 10 print date: August 17, 1994 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The new classroom space is needed to meet the current enrollment for the district. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uscs and plans, if any: A school facility is allowed as a conditional use in the R Zone. Conditional use requires special review to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with uses allowed in the same zone. The new school will allow additional classroom to house the existing and projected enrollment fir Cascade View Elementary School. This will be a state -of -the -art school which will allow the District to provide special programs that currently are unable to be housed in the existing school facility. The site can be adequately served by utilities. There are provisions for adequate parking, access and circulation. There will be a minimal increase in traffic and noise as a result of the expansion. The new school will generally be compatible with the existing buildings in height and exterior appearance. There should be minimal impacts to the surrounding residential community. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no housing impacts. School expansion is necessary to meet student population that exists in the school service boundary. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure will be the ridge line of the new gymnasium at 32' above the ground. The principal building materials will be brick and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views across the back of the site will be altered by the new addition. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will contain formal landscaping/ planting areas. All landscaping will be planted prior to project completion unless authorized by the planning department. A detailed landscaping plan will be submitted with the building construction plans. wp005.scs/amd 11 print date: August 17, 1994 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare that is produced from the site will be from building lighting and exterior lighting. Also, light will be produced from vehicle headlights. This will be minimal due to the limited usage of the school during the nighttime hours. There will be security lighting during this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Main off -site sources of light and glare are from vehicles using adjacent streets and the surrounding land uses. d. Proposed measures to reduce of control light and glare impacts, if any: The new security and parking lighting will be properly screened from public right of ways and surrounding residential uses. Classroom usage is mainly during daytime hours with minimal building lighting during the evening hours. Any additional lighting will be shielded as to not increase the ambient light level to an unacceptable level. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The existing school does provide a play ground and athletic fields on the site. There will be a new play ground and play structure as part of the school facility. The athletic fields will remain as existing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: School recreation opportunities are already provided on the site. There will be additional recreational facilities provided. The community can use these facilities after school hours. 13:. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. wp005.scs/amd 12 print date: August 17, 1994 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None, there are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation office will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main access to the site is from 32nd Ave S The existing site access will remain. The closest highway is Pacific Highway S (route 99). b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project.have? How many would the project eliminate? The school presently has 84 parking spaces. The completed project will have 90 total parking spaces for the school facility, 53 permanent, 11 drop -off, and 9 street. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private. Frontage improvements will be provided as required by City of Tukwila. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is not anticipated that there will be an increase in the volume of vehicular trips per day to the school. Ther are 45 trips per staff 60 trips per student drop -offs, and approximately 150 students are bused per day. The peak volumes occur at 9:00a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking and a new fire lane. Separation of bus and car driveways will greatly enhance site access safety. g. wp005.scs/amd 13 print dace: August 17. 1994 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, the number of staff er students are not increasing. The area is presently served by the Tukwila Fire Department and Police Department. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The use of fire alarms and safety equipment could aid in decreasing the number of fire calls. Also, proper internal circulation will assure adequate access and turn radii for emergency vehicles. Fire hydrant placement and fire flow requirements will be satisfied. A fire lane is to be provided throughout the site. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through proper extension of services. Extension of utilities is the District's responsibility. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing energy sources are supplied by the city of Tukwilla and Washington Natural Gas. The telephone service will be provided by Water and sewer service will be provided to the site by the City of Tukwila. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature. /it C�i (3,4SSL-Trl A aii%zCi 5 - 61ret .4- c4M-- Nancy Kaynor, $assetti Architects P.S., for the Applicant Date Submitted. At:gucr 1i1, 1994 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE wp005.scstamd 14 print date: August 17. 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EXHIBIT- A CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL South GeitraL SCHOOL DISTRICT 406 K I N G COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET • SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98168 Phone: 244.2100 SCALE IN STATUTE MILES 1A 12 N 0 COPYRIGHT KROLL MAP COMPANY. INC. I, A F F I D A V I T Notice Ll Notice of Public Hearing of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fl Planning Commission Agenda Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N ' hereby declare that: O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LJShoreline Management Permit O Determination of Non - significance E Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice fl Notice of Action 0 Official Notice Other Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on /1-41- - �� Name of Project JASVAlkt V U1,046gtaittitlire File Number L�`t' 0O City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Nov. 17, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: L94 -0069 APPLICANT: South Central School District REQUEST: Conditional Use request to construct a 31,041 sq. ft. addition to an existing elementary school located within the R -1, Single Family Zoning District. The Conditional Use is required under Section 18.12.050(2) of the TMC. LOCATION: Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32 Ave. S., Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L94 -0071 South Central School District Building permit request to construct a 31,041 sq. ft. addition to an existing elementary school. Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32 Ave. S., Tukwila L94 -0074 South Central School District Building permit request to renovate an existing approximately 86,000 sq. ft. middle school. Showalter Middle School, 4628 S. 144 Street, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the. Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times November 4. and 11, 1994 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners; File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 I 152304-905408 / SCOONES.MICHAELiW+ROSITA M 5' 48TH AVE S. SEATTLE WA '16230-49239-.a8--- -- ALEXANDER NANCY M a 13661 MILITARY ROAD SOUTH SEATTLE WA YAEGER DENNIS L 13803 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA '162304=9384-08-- - - FULLER KENNETH H+MERKLE 13605 MILITARY RD SO ' SEATTLE WA . . . . . , .. . ...,:... 734660-0-09 WHANG 11. OUK 16244 Iii AVE SW SEATTLE •A - 259999 734660-003-07 WILLIAMS JOHN F. 2919.S 1TH.ST TUKWILA 'AA 904000-0395-05 ( NELSON LEO V+MARY.ANN 2150S PEARL: SEATTLE WA ■ 004000-0401-07 JONAS SHIRLEY A 14421 46TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98166 161148 98168 _ 734660-0031-08 464080 89103 480435 98943 2N383.8 98168. 469999 98056 941805 98168 98168 004000 - 0517 -08 1 DALTON DAVID ROBINS 009999 +STRATFORD ,BETTY +PETERSON,PAUL:H 1411 ! SW 128TH ST SEATTLE WA 152304- 9018-03 STEIGHT JACK W ' 4510' S 184TH SEATTLE WA THOMAS BERNIECE L 3206 S 136TH.ST SEATTLE WA 886400-0225-07- --- MCLEAN GERYL G 3217 :S 135TH SEATTLE WA 886400-0265-08-- _..-_ -- MAKI DA 17633 118TH S E RENTON WA 886400 - 0275-06-- •--- - KROUSE ROBER.TA L 1 321 S 136TH. SEATTLE WA 886400 - 0285 -04 -- ._.._ WILKINSON KAREN' 3207 S • 136TH ST TUKWILA WA 886400 - 0295-02 ANGEVINE BRUCE W L 3217 S 136TH ST SEATTLE WA 886400 - 0365-07 BURNS DENISE L G 3226 S 137TH ST SEATTEL WA 886400-0380-08- -- POELLOT FLORENCE G' 3208 S 137TH SEATTLE WA 886400- 0,90 -06- .L- EE. -ABE 98146 2N3172 98188 C1180 98168 0779 98168 98055 809999 98168 330313 98168 449999 98168 129999 98168 669999 98168 I I 1004000-0581-09 �� , � WEBER WAYNE E 4624 S 146TH SEATTLE WA 10.52304- 9027 -02 4rt GRIFFITH D'EARL & ANNE 162204 j 4529 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 'ICUNNINGHAM TONY.D 13213 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 886400 - 0230 -00 DELGADO SAMUEL +MA -ISABEL FL209999 3223 S 135TH ST_ SEATTLE WA 98168 98168 049999 98168 886400 - 0270 -01 BLANCHETTE ROBERT L +RENEA A029999 3216 S 136TH ST. SEATTLE WA :Ii 9886400-0280 -09 I WOLD JOEL U +LAVITA E ON9999 y 3203 SO 136TH SY • SEATTLE WA 98168 98168 I YOUNG RONALD H +KAREN M 819999 3213 S 136TH G" SEATTLE WA 96168 it I 886400- 0300=05- - j WOLF TIMOTHY H E CINDY H 741552 9 3223 S 136TH ST I SEATTLE WA' 98168 I 886400 - 0375-05 --- 11BALL KENNETH 6113629 28TH PL S SEATTLE WA 886400=0385-03 IIWEAVER DOUGLAS•D 63202 SOUTH 137TH . II SEATTLE WA II 1886400-0395 -01 1.1- -e° Iau-iC nAv.r.rr ""c� .-w-» ,►n 110566 96168 949999 98168 -LEE ABE 0 3203 S 137TH ST SEATTLE WA '886400- 0400-04 NEFF.DONALO L 3215 S 137TH ST. SEATTLE WA 8864000410- 027- - - -- KRULLER SUSAN GRACE 3227 S 137TH ST TUKW.ILA WAj. ANAKA DAVID 3209 SOUTH,. 7TH ST 98168 I!; SEATTLE WA 11 i l '0886400-0405-09 859999 ! ! i W I CHERN. DARYL : K +DONNA 5."i 3221 S 137TH ST 98168 II' TUKWILA WA -1 886400- 0410-02 ,;; ;a cap ) C a *C , j t * ; * , a a'c a * a c a;t ;) iC * * s • >;**ahaAt5 ,< aca�t*>t,aJc>kat>�c�1c�t >k�;c** :c*a}cx<ak>ta;c>;c >;c*,;c c . >F37c?j< c4c**ajeatajc>k #atac*#*4ea}c*;t*'** * * :. ;'a **a. * (0#>t'***** ,:gcg k<4.4.** )* ** 32A023 98168 S 109999 98168 01734660- 0040 -07 0 BRIEN HAROLD J 2929 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 734660-0051-03 KLATTENBERG MURRAY D +KYONG 839999 2939 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA '98168 (734660- 0115 -07 BANKCAL TTEE TSAOPS PROPERTY 0994001L03 PO 80X 45183 SAN FRANCISCO CA 98168 190096 94145 734660-0157-06- ALEAGA EUDIE E +LILIU S 869999 2928 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 734660- 0191 -04 POASI NORMA JEAN 2952 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 734660- 0194 -01 WARE GORDON 2946.S 135TH ST. SEATTLE WASH 299999 98168 98168 '734760- 0535 -08 Ci}i ISAACSON RONALD E +DEBORAH•..A612192 4506 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 98168 0253 69 0542• =09.r ��... 734660- 0050 -04 JUSTICE JOYCE 2945 S 135TH SEATTLE 'JA 1734660-0060 -02 e; RUJA NICOLAE +IASMINA +RUJA, •i I NICOLAE P JR ' 3115 S 135TH ST S E A T T -L E WA 734660-0156 -07 TODD EDWARD L CI.' 2926 S 135TH ST i SEATTLE WA C:. 734660- 0190 -05 • TRITSCHLER ROBERT 13351 32ND AVE S SEATTLE WA 734660- 0192 -03 4,, HIGASHI TEOJY 2938 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 734660- 0195 -00 MANSKE JON +LISA 2960 S 135TH ST SEATTLE.WA 5 670433 . 98168 379999 1074 9816.3 M 479999 98168 98168 iry 459999 98168 734760-0541 -00 STENUAHL.JACK L +DELORES 009999 4514 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 98168 !734760-0547s04,y- •• °�' • SEATTLE WA 734760-0542-09 THOMPSON DANIEL C +NANCY M 469999 4526 140TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 886400- 0215-09 THOMAS 8ERNIECE 3206 S 136TH.ST SEATTLE WA 886400- 0225-07 MCLEAN GERYL 3217.S 135TH • SEATTLE WA 886400- 0265 -08 MAKI OA 17633 118TH S E RENTON WA 886400-0275-06 KROUSE ROBERTA L 3212'S 136TH SEATTLE WA 886400 - 0285 -04 WILKINSON .KAREN .32O7sS:136TH•ST. 'TUKWILA'WA C1175 98168 1:).)7i JG1VL ,.,N4C SEATTLE 7144 - ;I 734660- 0192 -03 HIGASHI TEDDY 2938 S 135TH ST: SEATTLE WA 734660- 0195-00 MANSKE JON +LISA 2960 S 135TH ST SEATTLE.WA "981'68 98168 459999 98163 734760-0541-00 STENUAHL.JACK L+DELORES 009999 4514 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 98168, 734760- 0547 -04 THOMPSON DANIEL C C NANCY M1N9999 4526 S 140TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 886400-0210 -04 HANSEN MARTIN LAUREL 329999 13512 32ND AVE S SEATTLE. WA 98168 886400-0220 -02 C1180 Li, CUNNINGHAM TONY.D 049999 3213 S 135TH ST 9816811 SEATTLE WA 98168 I . — 1 ; 886400-0230 -00 0779 DELGADO SAMUEL +MA — ISABEL FL209999 e,•. 3223 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 98168 98055 886400- 0270 -01 BSLANCHETTE ROBERT L +RENEA A029999 3216 S 136TH ST SEATTLE WA 866400-0280 -09 809999 c WOLD•JOEL D+LAVITA E i 3203 SO 136TH Si ' 98168 SEATTLE WA 330313 98168, II 886400-0290-07 YOUNG RONALD.H +KAREN �i3213,S 136TH' 1 SEATTLE WA . 98168 1 ON9999 98168 M 819999 98168 ..i4444 AYL SEATTLE WA • '004000-0483-08 , ELLEFSON LARRY 4617 S 144TH TUKWILA WA • . (-- c 004000-0505-02 CHMELA LARRIE+JACALYN 4727.S 144TH ST TUKWILA WA 004000..0511-04 MALICK LENA 4813.S 144TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 232346 98168 889999 98168 ! • 509999 98122 909999 5 !•1 1 98168 98168 , 941805 004000-0517-08 • DALTON DAVID ROBIN S .009999 +STRATFORD,BETTY+PETERSON,PAUL H 1411 SW 128TH ST ---- -SEATTLE-WA- • 152304-9018-03 STEIGHT JACK W 4510S .184TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9032-05 MCCLEAN HUGH P 2405 SW 170 SEATTLE WA 152304-9036-01 PRECIOUS ESSIE T 14726 WALLINGFORD AVE N SEATTLE WA ,J--1523049054-08 SCOONES.MICHAELiW+ROSITA •14314i48TWAVE Si SEATTLE ,' . WA. . 98146 2N3172 98188 11 98166 - - I F0875 / 98133 1 M 349999.11 i 98168 rIAIL moun rLy.) 4012(51N80W 0K720.4 LAS VEG - NV. 004000-0484-07 ELLEFSON LARRY P PO 80X 636 SOUTHCENTER WA 004000-0495-04 MILLER LUCILLE 4629 S 144TH AVE SEATTLE WA 004000-0500-07 SHARP MARILYN 6234 108TH SE RENTON WA 004000-0510-05 MALICK LENA 4813 S 144TH ST SEATTLE WA 004000-0516-09 LARSON MAURITZ F 4817 S 144TH ST SEATTLE WA 004000-0581-09 WEBER WAYNE E 4624 S 146TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9027-02 GRIFFITH D'EARL a ANNE 4529 S 140TH SEATTLE WA- 152304-9035702 MECHLING.MARTIN P 14011:MACADAM RD S SEATTLE WA 152304-9048-07 DEATRY BILLJ 14038 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE WA 89103 480435 98943 2N3838 98168 469999 98056, 941805 98168 98168 98168 162204 98168 ' 829999 98168 439999 98168 152304-9062-08 rORHAN.TIMOTHY.W+ALICE F 789999 .14003 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE..WA 98168 ; 152.304-9065.'05 RUPP ELEANOR A SANTORA EVELYN P 4617 S'140TH SEATTLE WA 152-304-9072-06 HOWE LARRY & EVELYN 14548 SE 51ST ST • BELLEVUE WA 4: 152304-9069.'01 769800. ■ MERYHEW-JOAN ' 4431.S,148TH : TUKWILA WA. 1 98168 )1(152304-9107-05 301759 l!ii RUPP MELVIN F 4611 S 140TH 98006 ' SEATTLE WA 1 152304-9108-04 SOUTH CENTRAL SCH DIST 406 657777 (152304-9111-09 /SANTORA JAMES E 4617 S 140TH ST SEATTLE WA /152304"9117"03 WHITE ARLENE L ? 4814 S 144TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9124-87 SCOONES H R 4710 S 144TH SEATTLE WA I 1 ; '152304-9109-03 / CORP CATHOLIC•ARCHBISHOP ...,,, C/O ST THOMAS PARISH 1 4415 S 140TH ST 1 SEATTLE WA 1 \ '152304-9116-04 1 / ANDERSON CRAIG A 4712 S 144TH 98168 , SEATTLE WA ■ • '152304-9124-04 .., 1.1 SCOONES.H R 4710 S 144TH 98168 • I SEATTLE ! 1 152304-9134-02 ' 339800 ,I.... ROAN JOHN W & MARILYN L H 4031 S 160TH 98168 1 SEATTLE WA 152304-9154-07 !1.4 RUPP ELEANOR A ' 47 SANTORA EVELYN P . I :I 4617 S•140TH 11 il SEATTLE WA , Il 152304-79189-06 N W REALTY 13019 8TH AVE S SEATTLE WA C, 269999 7N3558 98168 98168 9N0394 98.168 110617 98168 98168 ;-i52304;9139-07 . GORDON BETTY ANNE ROSALIE 309999 13348 32ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 ' 152304-9164-05 SOUTH CENTRAL SCH DIST 406 657777 -.. • „ . I kIVERTON PK UNITED:METH CH 687777 3118*S,140TH 4: 01024-001 . SEATTLE*WA 98168 11 • ; • SEATTLE WA 004000-0484-07 ELLEFSON LARRY P PO BOX 636 SOUTHCENTER WA 480435 98943 - —004000-0495-04-- - 889999 MILLER LUCILLE 2N3838 4629 S 144TH AVE 98168 S: SEATTLE WA 98168 ?R--004000-0500-07 509999 S HARP SHARP MARILYN 4 . 6234 108TH SE 98122 RENTON WA 1 1 , 1 .... !,,0040,00-0505-02 ------.--:.- I (--oo400stpro-.05------7---- -----------2 Lv.- j j,....„...---KostercK LEN.A.,...1.1500 -...' ... 941805 .:- -".... 1:7 ...'C A Lan-T 1-r'rC T --"'-' . 1 1 /AI La wr c"91-7.t. Tu c.er"-- *." ..1" ...r•e: • 469999 98056 COUTCHER DR • 14328 48TH.AVE S SEATTLE WA. • . 152304-9250-00' BAUMAN JEFFREY R 18014 NE 125TH ST REDMOND WA ; • 152304-9269-09 MCCREADY ARTHUR J 4716 S 144TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9271-05 GRIFFITH ANN SCOONES 4529 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9281-03 MORGAN DAVID A 5190 S 166TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9290-02 SCOONES H W 14314 48TH AVE S SEATTLE WA , . 162304-9128-09 ./ MCDANIEL MATTHEW L 13629 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA C0679 d Is 98168 705165 ''11 4 98052 98168 „JF 98168 . , ) 1079 98118 h A 5 C0373 98168 MCCREADY1! J 4716 SO 14TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9264-04 RIVERTON CREST CEMETARY UNISERVICE CORP P 0 BOX 11067 PORTLAND OR 152304-9270-06 PIERSON DONALD A 1430348TH AVE SO SEATTLE WA 152304-9275-01 SLEIGHT.JACK W SLEIGHT JOAN F 4510 S 184TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9289-05 MONAGHAN SHEILA 1431348TH SO SEATTLE WA 162304-904Z-OZ THOMAS ABNER 13831 MILITARY RC S SEATTLE WA 98161 81777 ' 0246.3-002 751632 98168 600979 98188 74999g 98168 R1277 98168 162304-9060709 639999 RIVERTON PK UNITED METH CH 687777 0 3118 S 140TH ST 01024-001 98168 SEATTLE WA • 98168. 1.277 98158 259999 98168 162304-9143 -00 162304-9100-01 ORSBORN CURTIS N c 13635 MILITARY ROAD SOUTH SEATTLE WA 162304-9142-01 BADER D 13660 MILITARY RD SEATTLE WA 162304-9157-03 MCDANIEL. MATTHEW L+LINDA C 13621 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA 81.999? 98163 317777 98163 KNIPP KENNETH J 439999 1 M 43999( : RD S SEATTLE WA 98168 1 ._,-}u_vE-ell.N.--PIC;;01.T.EIKM ET fljCH' "-6871-' -r, e••••••'"'O.ER , INS':a""KIN-.-1,^10arsior.alLr.,..y70-5446 .... ......--.;;?' ' (.,„62A-0..; -I64-----4-- 77- -7 - 7- - --- - - ' 98168 A F F I D A V I T .I *a4MI 4 ■ Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting JBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet fl Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fl Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: ['Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fl Shoreline Management Permit fl Determination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice J Other • Q Other was pawed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project L$P,A -fit tJ(Q4) F.Lie Number 4, -- 1 Signature �� (7'�� RECEIVED �� 1 81994 GU►v►►vi v N 1 I-Y DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No Epic File No oo Fee $325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascade _View Elementary_ School 2. 3. Name of applicant: South Central School District Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Kirstine Whisler 4640 South 144 th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Contact: Nancy Kaynor Bassetti Architects 1011 Western Avenue #701 Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1994 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned to start in April 1995. The moderization and new addition of the school is scheduled for use in the fall of 1996. The construction will be phased. New construction to be completed first, than modernization. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is unknown at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prcparcd, or will be prepared, directly related CO this proposal. Topographical Survey by Penhallegon Associates, Consulting Engineers, May 25, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Determination Conditional Use Permit(CUP) approval Design Review Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. wp005.ses/amd 3 print date. August 17, 1994 The project is a moderization and addition to an existing elementary school. The completed project will meet the current and projected program needs fir 400 kindergarten through fifth grade students. The project includes: Lot area: 8.93 acres Building coverage: 29,689 S.F. existing 2Z782 S.F. proposed 5Z471 S.F. total New car and bus driveways Increased parking areas Repair to existing grass athletic fields Playgrounds Landscaping and irrigation 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project., including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descriptio, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if • reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you• arenot required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address : Parcel 734660 -0024. The site is locates at 13601 32nd Ave.S., Tukwila, WA. Exhibit A is a viciniry map showing the site. The legal description is exhibit B. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: - The area of expansion is rolling in terrain. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay; sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is characterized as three subsurface units. l.) Fill - about 2' thick, highly moisture sensitive and low strength cr moderate compressibility. 2.) Weathered Till - 2i-4' of loose to medium dense silty sand & stiff sandy silt. 3) Till- dense to very dense silty fine to coarse grained sand w/ some gravelly fine to coarse grained sand w /some cobbles. wpOO5.scs/amd 4 print date: August 17, 1994 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no history of unstable soils on the site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be grading necessary for the new addition and paved areas. It is estimated that there will be 7,110 c.y. of cut and 55 c.y. of fill need for this project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Short term increase in potential for on site erosion is always possible during site preparation & development activity. Yes, erosion could occur especially in regraded area west of the new building addition. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing impervious area is approximately 83,292 SF (1.91 acres) acres. The new addition and paved parking areas will have 58,119 SF (1.33 acres) acres of impervious surface. The impervious area for the total site is 141,411 SF (3.25 acres), or 36.4 %. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Prior to site work a grading permit shall have been obtained for any on -site grading which is not exempted by section 7003 UBC. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESCP) shall have been submitted and approved. g. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short term emissions and odors would be from construction equipment and site preparation. These impacts would be minimal. There will be no significant long -term impacts. The main generator of emissions is from vehicles coming to and from the school. Automobile emissions consists mainly of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. There will be a minimal increase in traffic to the site. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The main off -site sources of emissions are from automobiles travelling along the adjacent roadways. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils and washing truck wheels before they leave the site. wp005.scs/amd 5 print date: August 17, 1994 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including ycar -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will thc project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, thc number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. wp005.scs /amd 6 print date: August 17, 1994, c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The rate and volume of storm water runoff will increase for those previously undeveloped areas. The runoff will be directed to existing drainage and improved facilities. The storm drainage detention volume will be 309 LF S' pipe (± 6,000 cu. ft.) 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? IF so, generally describe. There could be oils, grease and other pollutants from the additional paved areas that could enter the ground through runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control surface runoff during construction and after development (as required by the city). The existing storm drainage system will be modified to accept the new drainage system. No open space ponding is proposed and all detention will be contained in underground pipe or vault systems. Run off is collected in storm drain system piped to a detention pipe. Once water leaves detention system it enters a 130' bio- filtration swale, then goes off site into a side road ditch system. Construction impacts could be minimized by the following: - schedule construction during the drier months of the year. -provide temporary cover for any exposed areas: and -keep runoff velocities low. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen; other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _x,_ shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other type of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing trees will be removed for new building and driveway construction. Some existing dying Madrona trees will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. wp005.scslamd 7 print date: August 17, 1994 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There will be additional landscaping provided along the perimeter of the site and new paved areas. The existing areas near the buildings will be enhanced and upgraded with a comprehensive landscape plan. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. squirrels, small rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Due to the existence of the school, there is no quality wildlife habitat on the site. • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds'of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. All sources of energy are available to the site. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The requirements of the Uniform Building Code will be satisfied in the construction of the new additions and substantial remodels. Energy conservative materials are encourage in all new construction. An Energy Conservation Report has been prepared by Hargis Engineers comparing HVAC Systems with respect to thier life cycle costs. wp005.scs/amd 8 print date: August 17. 1994 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This project will not generate any environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tukwilla Fire Department and Police Department respond to emergency situations. The South Central School District implements a safety and emergency program for students and staff 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are no known health hazards that would occur as a result of further site development. Any pesticides used in the maintenance of the school grounds will be properly handled by qualified personnel. b. Noise wp005.scs/amd 1) What types of noise cxists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main noise source in the immediate area is from traffic along adjacent streets and surrounding land uses. Significant noise is generated by aircraft to and from SeaTac Airport. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short -term noise impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Site noise would be generated on average with in the hours of 7 ::30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. At 200 feet from construction, Leq would be approximately as follows Activity Leq ( in decibels) Clearing 71 -71 Excavation 59 -77 Foundations 65 Building Erection 60 -72 Finishing 62 -77 Long term noise impacts will be those associated with the use of the site fir additional classroom space. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The following mitigation measures would reduce the construction impact: 1. Construction equipment should be equipped with muffler devices 2. Locate noisy operations away from noise sensitive areas when possible. 9 print date: August 17, 1994 3. Shut -off of idling equipment. 4. Schedule noisiest operations for the middle of the day. Building construction will be done during daytime hours S. Schedule noisy operations so they are not concurrent. On-going noise impacts fromaircrafi will be mitigated' in the buildings through construction systems abd acoustical materials. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • The site is used for a school with residential uses surrounding the site. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Cascade View Elementary currently exists on the site. The facility consist of 4 school buildings, a covered play area and two portable buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? There are no plans to demolish any of the existing permanent buildings. The portables will be removed from the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R -1 -7.2 Single Family Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? "Low Density Residential" g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j• wp005.scs/amd The renovated school will accommodate 400 students. The staff will remain at. 45 All time and 10 part time people. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There will be no displacement. The existing students and staff will remain at this school. 10 print dare: August 17, 1994 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The new classroom space is needed to meet the current enrollment for the district. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A school facility is allowed as a conditional use in the R Zone. Conditional use requires special review to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with uses allowed in the same zone. The new school will allow additional classrooms to house the existing and projected enrollment for Cascade View Elementary School. This will be a state -of -the -art school which will allow the District to provide special programs that currently are unable to be housed in the existing school facility. The site can be adequately served by utilities. There are provisions for adequate parking, access and circulation. There will be a minimal increase in traffic and noise as a result of the expansion. The new school will generally be compatible with the existing buildings in height and exterior appearance. There should be minimal impacts to the surrounding residential community. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicated whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no housing impacts. School expansion is necessary to meet student population that exists in the school service boundary. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure will be the ridge line of the new gymnasium at 32' above the ground. The principal building materials will be brick and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views across the back of the site will be altered by the new addition. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will contain formal landscaping/ planting areas. All landscaping will be planted prior to project completion unless authorized by the planning department. A detailed landscaping plan will be submitted with the building construction plans. wp005.scs/amd 11 print dare: August 17, 1994 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare that is produced from the site will be from building lighting and exterior lighting. Also, light will be produced from vehicle headlights. This will be minimal due to the limited usage of the school during the nighttime hours. There will be security lighting during this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Main off site sources of light and glare are from vehicles using adjacent streets and the surrounding land uses. d. Proposed measures to reduce of control light and glare impacts, if any The new security and parking lighting will be properly screened from public right of ways and surrounding residential uses. Classroom usage is mainly during daytime hours with minimal building lighting during the evening hours. Any additional lighting will be shielded as to not increase the ambient light level to an unacceptable level. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The existing school does provide a play ground and athletic fields on the site. There will be a new play ground and play structure as part of the school facility. The athletic fields will remain as existing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: School recreation opportunities are already provided on the site. There will be additional recreational facilities provided. The community can use these facilities after school hours. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. wp005.scs/amd 12 print date: August 17, 1994 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None, there are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation office will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main access to the site is from 32nd Ave S The existing site access will remain. The closest highway is Pacific Highway S. (route 99). b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The school presently has 84 parking spaces. The completed project will have 90 total parking spaces for the school facility, 53 permanent, 11 drop -off, and 9 street. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private. Frontage improvements will be provided as required by City of Tukwila. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is not anticipated that there will be an increase in the volume of vehicular trips per day to the school. Ther are 45 trips per staff' 60 trips per student drop - offs, and approximately 150 students are bused per day. The peak volumes occur at 9:00a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking and a new fire lane. Separation of bus and car driveways will greatly enhance site access safety. g. wp005.scs/amd 13 print date: August 17. 1994 15. Public Services a. Would the projcct result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health cart, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, the number of staff & students are not increasing. The area is presently served by the Tukwila Fire Department and Police Department. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The use offire alarms and safety equipment could aid in decreasing the number offire calls. Also, proper internal circulation will assure adequate access and turn radii for emergency vehicles. Fire hydrant placement and fire flow requirements will be satisfied. A fire lane is to be provided throughout the site. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through proper extension of services. Extension of utilities is the District's responsibility. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing energy sources are supplied by the city of Tukwilla and Washington Natural Gas. The telephone service will be provided by Water and sewer service will be provided to the site by the City of Tukwila. C. Signature The above answers are truc and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature. /t'1( CC/ 2i�Z�/y' 64S567rI 4PGt?%r5, - 4,(.7? 4o '�G•!C� /ir Nancy IKaynor, $assetti Architects P.S., for the Applicant Date Submitted. Augucr 1$, 1994 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE wp005.scs/amd 14 print date: August 17. 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EXHIBIT- A CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL lea sr : SEATTLE .1/ South antral SCHOOL DISTRICT 406 KING COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 144Ih STREET • SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98168 Ph•••: 244.2100 SCALE IN STATUTE MILE5 MI.0 SITE 'Morro n 5__ ukwil I ■1-r4 yam Sc t TUK .1 „. _ • , IS ST Tukwila interchange on COPYRIGHT KROLL MAP COMPANY. INC. • 1 _, A F F I D A V I T Notice of 0 Notice of Board of Packet fl Board of Packet 0 Planning Packet Public Hearing Public Meeting Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fJ Shoreline Management Permit Ccolkt9 Determination of Non - significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance fl Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice fl Notice of Action 00f ficial Notice Other 0 Other was padTed to each of the following addresses on i Cf u (I Name of Project ,Gt.c��(.Q �%IQ,Gc.) File Number P '14' ()No a City of Tukwila Department of Community Development City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE • John W. Rants, Mayor Rick Beeler, Director Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Nov. 17, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: L94 -0069 APPLICANT: South Central School District REQUEST: Conditional Use request to construct a 31,041 .sq. ft. addition to an existing elementary school located within the R -1, Single Family Zoning District. The Conditional Use is required under Section 18.12.050(2) of the TMC. LOCATION: Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32 Ave. S., Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L94 -0071 South Central School District Building permit request to construct a 31,041 sq. ft. addition to an existing elementary school. Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32 Ave. S., Tukwila L94 -0074 South Central School District Building permit request to renovate an existing approximately 86,000 sq. ft. middle school. Showalter Middle School, 4628 S. 144 Street, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the. Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times November 4 and 11, 1994 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, ;,o b., 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 41313665 O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: L Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Determination of Non - significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Official Notice Other Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on C1-SC Name of Project � VC4/0 �v,c File Number L 0) (9 9 Coo City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rick Beeler, Director Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Nov. 17, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: L94 -0069 APPLICANT: South Central School District REQUEST: Conditional Use request to construct a 31,041 sq. ft. addition to an existing elementary school located within the R -1, Single Family Zoning District. The Conditional Use is required under Section 18.12.050(2) of the TMC. LOCATION: Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32 Ave. S., Tukwila. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L94 -0071 South Central School District Building permit request to construct a 31,041 sq. ft. addition to an existing elementary school. Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32 Ave. S., Tukwila L94 -0074 South Central School District Building permit request to renovate an existing approximately 86,000 sq. ft. middle school. Showalter Middle School, 4628 S. 144 Street, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the. Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Distribution: Seattle Times November 4. and 11, 1994 Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 1.52304- 9054-08 SCOONES.MICHAELiW +ROSITA M 349999 !' 14314 48TH AVE.S. SEATTLE WA 98168 - -- ALEXANDER NANCY M 039800 13661 MILITARY ROAD: SOUTH •SEATTLE WA 98168 16-2-3-049-351-07 YAEGER DENNIS L 13803 MILITARY RO S SEATTLE WA `16230'4- 9384=08 -- FULLER KENNETH 13605 MILITARY SEATTLE WA • 149999 98168 H +MERKLEY,LY759999 RD SO ' 98168 322920 - 0210 =01 -- -- MCCAUSLAND ROBERT G +ANGELA 159999 2521 20STH AVE E SUMNER MA S 152304- 9062-08 FORHAN•TIMDTHY.W +ALICE F. 789999 5 14003 MACADAM RO S SEATTLE WA 98.168 162304 9331=0.2- HAZEN•RICHARD;E 0 V M 3N9999 13802 MILITARY RD.S. SEATTLE WA 98168 162.304- 9372-02 SNYDER LINDA C.j 13617 MILITARY RD S - SEATTLE WA '322920-0100-04 MCCAUSLAND ROBERT i' 2521 208TH AVE, -E SUMNER WA 059999 98168 G +ANGELA 159999 9(3390.. 322920- 0220 -09 -�� -- -- MCCAUSLAND ROBERT G +ANGELA 159999 I.' 2521 208TH AVE E 98390 ,4'' SUMNER WA 1322920- 0250 -02 MCCAUSLAND ROBERT G +ANGELA 159999 2521 208TH AVE E 98390 11 SUMNER WA j I• '734660-0006 -09 HAYES TIMOTHY M +LINDA PO BOX 69125 SEATTLE.WA (-322920-32;3-07 !' MCCAUSLAND ROBERT G +ANGELA 159999 2521 233T1 AVE E SUMNER mA 98390 322920-02:.0-00 MCCAUSLAND ROBERT G +ANGELA 159999 2521'20SH AVE E SUMNER mi 98390 7 3 4 6 6 0- 0 0 ::r- 0 3 --- - - - - -_ - _..._.___ -. ------ ...... -_ PHILLIPS SLADYS 069999 .13523 ":LITARY RD S SEATTLE %A 98168 734660- 0C1•-09 • BAUMAN =1?0L0 W 13505 MLITARY RD S SEATTLE •A P--734660,.007Z-09 WILLIAKSI RICK +JANICE 13522 .MILITARY RD S SEATTLE •A • �7rb�pi0.'ir�.q. %:�'ti�'�'� 480645 9816.8 139999 98168 98390 • C 34999.9 98168 734660-0013 -00 HAGEN CARL M + HARRIET 13521 MILITARY'RD S SEATTLE WA 734660 0020-0 1 KOPP EMIL 13528 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA '734660- 0023 -08 SCHUKAR STELLA R 13524 MILITARY.RD•S SEATTLE WA (7346y30031-08 98168 361291 98168 C1080 98168 734660-00: -09 WHANG It: 7UK '16244 11.1 AVE SW SEATTLE •A 73466000K-07 WILL At1S JOHN F. . 2919 '.S 15TH '.•ST TUKWILA irkit 259999 98166 161148 -.98168 004000-0395-05 NELSON LEO V +MARY.ANN. 2150'S PEARL: SEATTLE WA 004000-0401 -07, f JONAS SHIRLEY A 14421 46TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 734660-0031-08 VASILIEFF'ANDREW.N c 13504 MILITARY.ROAD SOUTH SEATTLE WA 734660-0034 -05. I WHANG IK:DUK C 16244•10TH AVE I SEATTLE .Wk sw • 98168 004000..0517..08 ' 1 004000-0581-09 I DALTON DAVID ROBIN.S .._ 009999 i)! WEBER WAYNE E. +STRATFORD,BETTY+PETERSON,PAULH .? 4624 S 146TH 1411!SW 128TH ST I SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 98146 1 152304-9018-03 STEIGHT JACK W ' 4510S 184TH. SEATTLE WA • THOMAS BERNIECE e 3206 S 136TH.ST SEATTLE WA 686400-0225-07 MCLEAN GERYL C 3217S 135TH SEATTLE, WA' 886400-02.65-08 MAKI DA 17633 118TH S E RENTON WA 586400-02-75-06 KROUSE ROBER.TA L 4■ 3212 S 136TH. SEATTLE WA 86400-0285-04 WILKINSON KAREN' 3207 S 136TH ST TUKWILA WA S86400-0295-02- ANGEVINE BRUCE W .■ 3217 S 136TH ST SEATTLE WA C, 86400-0365707-- BURNS DENISE L 3226 S 137TH ST SEATTEL WA 86400-0380-08- POELLOT FLORENCE . 3208 S:137TH SEATTLE WA. • 886400-0190-.06- 1...t n 2N3172 • 98188 C1180 98168 0779 98168 98055 1 98168 152304-9027-02 GRIFFITH O'EARL G. ANNE 4.a.' 4529 S 140TH SEATTLE WA CUNNINGHAM TONY.D F3213 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 162204 98168 049999 98168 76400-0230-00 j DELGADO.SAMUEL+MA-ISABEL FL209999 4.13223 S 135TH ST. !SEATTLE WA 98168 '88640.0=027001 I • BLANCHE TTE ROBERT L+RENEA A029999 3216 ST 98168 I . 6400-0280-09 809999. I WOLD JOEL O+LAVITA E ,I. 3203 SO 136TH Si 98168 'r SEATTLE WA 1 6 64°0-0290-07 330313 98168 • 1 ON9999 98168 YOUNG RONALD H+KAREN M .819999. 3213 S 136TH SEATTLE WA 8.6400..0300-05 • 449999 WOLF TIMOTHY H CINDY H 741552 4,3223 S 136TH ST 98168 I1SEATTLE WA' k. ThB8'64.60.0175-05 129999 !1BALL KENNETH 4'13629 28TH PL S 98168 '1SEATTLE WA .-\ 86400385-03 WEAVER DOUGLAS: D 413202 SOUTH 137TH , 1LSEATTLE.WA 98168 669999 98168. 1686400-0395-01 98168 110566 96168 7-- 949999 98168 LEE'ABE 0 j 3203 S 137TH ST SEATTLE WA 86400-.04o004 7- - - - -- - - -- NEFF, DONALD • L. 3215 S 137TH ST. SEATTLE WA '886400-0470-0.2 -: • KRULL.ER SUSAN GRACE: 3227•.4,Si 137TH., ST( TUKWILA WA.;: • r-- 734660-0040 -07 0 BRIEN HAROLD J 2929 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA L G . ANAKA DAVID 6r- 3209 SOUTH• 1'ITH ST 98168 1,I SEATTLE WA 11 1886400- 0405 -09 859999 I_ I W I CHERN: DARYL : K +GONNA S 3221 S..137TH. ST 98168 TUKWILA WA .259999 9818:8 • 1886400- 0410 -02. 60 s, 32A023 98168 109999 98168 x; cat;c*>jcic>,c>Jcac atnaj*;c * * 30 jcajcs,< >;c >;c ;<aca�caM1C***;c !h9jcat>4!t�►jc c.15aJc t cstata t�cc�F> 9ca�c >�C>�Ca;<>;c>;cacatahajc�(c . s r t> > a >t • **? stat a aka t * * acs ;a]ri;F ,cahijc (cacac***ac*** * *ac{ t >k>kak* >4><kStat>;4a01 :' '98168 734660- 0051-03 KLATTENBERG MURRAY. 0 +KYONG 839999 2939 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 734660- 0115 -07 BANKCAL TTEE TSAOPS PROPERTY 4994001L03 PO BOX 45183 SAN.FRANCISCO CA 734660- 0157 -06- ALEAGA EODIE E +L•ILIU S 2928 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 734660 - 0191-04 POASI NORMA JEAN 2952 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 190096 734660- 0050 -04 JUSTICE JOYCE ' 2945 S 135TH SEATTLE WA • 670433 . 96163 734660- 0060 -02 RUJA NICOLAE +IASMINA +RUJA, 379999 a NICOLAE P JR 1 3115 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 734660- 0.156 -07 I TODD EDWARD L di' 2926 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 94145 , 734660- 0190-05, 869999 4, TRITSCHLER.ROBER.T 13351. 32ND AVE S 98168 SEATTLE WA 299999 98168 734660-0194 -01 WARE GORDON' 2946. S. 135TH ST. SEATTLE WASH 734660- 0192 -03 HIGASHI:TEDDY 2938 .S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA ll,. 98168 /734760- 0535-08 ISAACSON RONALD E +DEBORAH•.- A612192 4506 S 140TH •SEATTLE WA 6905,42- 0 — 5 98168 .1- ...1 7 3 4 7 6 0 7,05 47 p„4 '": "��;r'' . ;;; 4 M 1074 9816H 479999 98168 98168 734660- 0195 -00 MANSKE JON +LISA 2960 S 135TH ST SEATTLE:WA 734760-0541-00 STENDAHL. JACK 4514 S 140TH, SEATTLE WA L +DELORES 459999 98168. 009999 98168 ■■ ♦ J ■ 1 1. °� %'SE•ATTL• E TWA. 734660-0191 -04 POA5I NORMA JEAN 2952 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 734660- 0194 -01 WARE GORDON' 2946.S 135TH ST SEATTLE WASH 98168 SEATTLE J I734660 - 0192 -03 299999 EG HIGASHI °TEOUY 2938 S 135TH ST: 98168 SEATTLE WA 734660 - 0195 -00 GL MANSKE JON +LISA 2960 S 135TH ST 98168 SEATTLE.W4 734760- 0535 -08 ISAACSON RONALD E +DEBORAH•A612192 4506 S 1'40TH SEATTLE WA 96168 98168 459999 98168 I • Il 734760-0541-00 IP STENUAHL.JACK L +OELORES 4514 S 140TH SEATTLE WA . 1 . 734760- 0542-09 THOMPSON DANIEL C +NANCY'M 469999 140TH ST SEATTLE .WA 886400 - 0205-01 MILLIKEN C D 3207 S 135TH• SEATTLE WA 886400- 0215-09 THOMAS BERNIECE 3206 S 136TH.ST SEATTLE WA 886400-0225-07 'MCLEAN GERYL G' 3217.S 135TH SEATTLE WA • .... , i-d 886400-0265 -08 MAKI DA 17633 118TH S E RENTON WA f i 886400- 0275 -06 • KROUSE ROBER.TA L G' • 3212* S' 136TH SEATTLE WA 1 �1 886400- 0285 -04 WILKINSON.KAREN: .3207.! S•. 136TH, ST . TUKWICA''WA 1. 98168 • ll� C1175 IC 98168 . 009999 98168.,. 734760- 0547 -04 THOMPSON DANIEL:.C,& NANCY M1N9999 4526 S 140TH ST TUKWILA WA 886400-0210-04 HANSEN MARTIN LAUREL 13512 32ND AVE 'S SEATTLE, WA 886400- 0220 -02 C1130 CUNNINGHAM TONY.D d., 3213 S 135TH ST 98168 SEATTLE WA 0779 98168 98168 329999 98168. 049999 98168 886400-0230-00 OELGADO.SAMUEL +MA— ISABEL FL209999 3223 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 886400-0270-01 1� EBLANCHETTE ROBERT L +RENEA r- 3216 S 136TH Sr; 98055) SEATTLE WA 886400-0280-09 809999 WOLO•JOEL O +LAVITA E 3203 SO 136TH Si ' 98168 I SEATTLE WA 886400- 0290-07 330313.0 YOUNG RONALD 3213:.S 136TH' 98168 1. • SEATTLE.'WA • H +KAREN M A029999 98168 ON9999 98168 819999 98168 .Ltt'tLU, `iU $ f$ N v l-. J SEATTLE • WA 4)4 n. 52q 004000 - 0490-09 t' ELLEFSON LAVONNE 0 1 4617 SO' 144TH i� SEATTL • WA '004000-0483-08 .ELLEFSON LARRY 4617,S 144TH TUKWILA WA 7 004000 - 0496 -03 DIETSCH.MICHAEL P 3909,E HOWELL ST SEATTLE WA .4 ;;•� 004000"0511"04. 0 7 1 MALICK LEN 98168 rt$- iL i \V :�' i•l_VJ 4012: SR BOW OK-20.4. • LAS VEGAS'"NV 232346 98168 J 1 \I 004000-0505-02 CHMELA LARRIE +JACALYN 4727iS 144TH ST TUKWILA WA A _A 4813.S 144TH ST ••I SEATTLE WA f.. 004000 - 0517 -08 - DALTON DAVID ROBIN S 889999 98168 \I 6, !,r 98122 I,- 1 98168 (; • ert 509999 909999 941805 98168 ! 004000-0484-07 ELLEFSON LARRY: P PO BOX 636 • . SOUTHCENTER • WA 004000-0495 -04 MILLER.LUCILLE 4629 S 144TH AVE SEATTLE WA 89103 480435 98943 Jl• 2N3838. 004000- 0500-07 SHARP MARILYN 6234 108TH SE RENTON WA 004000 - 0510-05 MALICK.LENA 4813 S,144TH ST SEATTLE WA 98168 469999 004000 - 0516-09 LARSON MAURITZ.F 4817 S 144TH ST SEATTLE. WA ' ,/ 004000- 0581-09 009999 /' WEBER WAYNE E +STRATFORD,BETTY +PETERSON,PAUL H '`' 4624 S.1.46TH 1411!SW 128TH ST 1 SEATTLE'WA - SEATTLE --WA- --- •--- _ - - -__- -- _--- __-- -....- ..__98146 I r li'Zr: 152304-9018-03 152304 - 9027 -02 STEIGHT•JACK W 2N3172 - ; GRIFFITH D'EARL C ANNE 4510;S 184TH: 4529 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 98188 11 152304- 9032 -05 MCCLEAN HUGH P 2405 SW 170 'SEATTLE WA 152304- 9036 -01 PRECIOUS ESSIE T. •14726 WALLINGFORD SEATTLE WA i 1 _.. SEATTLE WA• • �I 152304-903502 F0675 MECHLING.MARTIN'P 14011•MACADAM RD S 98166 1 SEATTLE WA I/ AVE N 98133 1 • 349999.4 98168 152304- 9054-08 SC00NES,MICHAELiW +ROSITA•M ..14314. 48TH ••AVE Si •SEATTLE�'•WA: 152304- 9048 -07 DEATRY B ILL. J . ' 14038•MACADAM RD S SEATTLE.WA 152304-9062 -08 FORHAN- TIMOTHY.W +ALICE .14003 MACADAM RD S SEATTL.E..WA 96056{ 941805 98168 J 1 98168 98168 162204 98168 829999 98168 439999 98168 F 769999 98168 • (152304-9065'05 I RUPP. ELEANOR A SANTORA EVELYN P 4617,5'140TH SEATTLE WA, r 152304-9069".01 769800. I V MERYHEW-JOAN.C, 4431.S,148TH TUKWILA WA. (152304I-9072-06 HOWE LARRY.& EVELYN 14548 SE 51ST:ST •BELLEVUE WA (-152304-9108-04' 98168 301759 98006 SOUTH CENTRAL SCH DIST (-152304-9111-09 SANTORA JAMES E 4617 S 140TH ST SEATTLE WA (152304-9117-03 WHITE ARLENE L ? 4814 5 144TH SEATTLE WA 152304-9124-87 SCOONES H R 47105 144TH SEATTLE WA 406 657777 >152304-9107-05 RUPP MELVIN F 4611 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 1-52304-9109-03 CORP CATHOLIC:ARCHBISHOP 9N0394 C/O ST THOMAS PARISH 4415 S 140TH ST SEATTLE WA 289999 98168 98168 (152304-9116-04 / ANDERSON CRAIG A f 4712 S 144TH 98168 SEATTLE WA 7N3558 98168 339800 98168 152304-9139-07 GORDON BETTY ANNE ROSALIE 309999 13348 32ND AVE S TUKWILA WA. 98168 152304-9164-05 SOUTH CENTRAL SCH DIST 406 657777 I152304,-9197-06 ROLPH THOMAS M 041575 h 34819 28TH:PLSW • 98168 , 110617 98168 52304-9124-04 SCOONES,H R 4710 S 144TH SEATTLE WA /152304-9134-02 ROAN JOHN. W C MARILYN L 4031 S 160TH SEATTLE WA 1152304-9154-07 4 RUPP ELEANOR A f6:41 SANTORA EVELYN P 4617 S 140TH SEATTLE WA 1 /152304-79189-06 N W REALTY C. 13019 8TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 152304-9209-02 1 MATHISEN RALPH A 4704 S. 144TH ST FEDERALWAY .WA 98023 11 SEATTLE WA : • • _ 1 . ._ •-f513-04:9210-09- 'I 152304'9210-90 CORP.CATHOLICLARCHBISHOP 677777. ,„ CORP CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP 611777, ST:THOMAS)PARISHI.377"060: :D....,11 'ST.THOMAS'PARISH: 00377-058 910-MARION- ; !. 910MARION- SEATTLE,WA: 98104 ;- 1 SEATTLE. WA.,., I . 98104- 98168 98188 7698.00 98168 3N2548 98163 98168 1 ( • • 'ffl • G RIVERTON PK UNITEO.MET 3118'S:•140TH • i; • SEATTLE'WA • k • 162304+9165-03 G�I RIVERTON'PK UNITED METH.CH.687777 3118 .S . 140TH " 01024 -001 , SEATTLE WA H 98168 ' .H 687777 01024-001:—c 98168 I i• • ..•, t��i 16-2304= 9178 � COUTCHER DR 14328 48TH.AVE SEATTLE WA. . 152304-9250-00' •BAUMAN JEFFREY'R 48014 NE 125TH ST REDMOND WA • MCCREADY ARTHUR J 4716.S 144TH SEATTLE WA. 152304-9271-05 GRIFFITH ANN SCOONES • 4529 S 140TH SEATTLE WA • 152304-9281-03 MORGAN DAVID A 51905 166TH SEATTLE WA' C0679 98168 : 152304-9264-04 RIVERTON CREST CEMETARY 0 i UNISERVICE CORP • 98052 1 P 0 BOX 11067 PORTLAND OR 705165 MCCREADY. 4716.S0 144TH SEATTLE. WA 98168 152304-9270-06 PIERSON DONALD A 1430348TH AVE SO SEATTLE WA '" 152304-9275-01 SLEIGHT-JACK W .S SLEIGHT JOAN F 98168 4510 5 184TH SEATTLE WA 9816 1 817777 0246.3-002 9721 751632 98168 -■ 600979 , .1'. 152304-9289-05 1079 . MONAGHAN SHEILA 15 1431348TH SO 98118 I,\H SEATTLE WA 152304-9290702 SCOONES M 114 14314 48TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 162304-9059-02 RISTAU EVELYN M 13642 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA 162304-9088-07 FRYMIER RONALD J 13650.MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA. ... C0378 98168 I 639999 111 2 I c 1277 I I I L 98168 98168 162304-91.28-09 4 MCDANIEL MATTHEW L 259999 .13629'MILITARY RD.S SEATTLE WA 98168 " •• • • • 162304-9143-00 KNIPP KENNETH.J 13813 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA tosa Jt '439999 ' 98168 162304-9042-02 THOMAS ABNER L 13831 MILITARY RC S SEATTLE WA 162304-9060709 RIVERTON PK UNITED METH CH 687777 3118 S 140TH ST. 01024-001 SEATTLE WA 98168. 98188 74999q 98168 R1277 98168 _ 162304-9100-01 ORSBORN CURTIS N 13635 MILITARY ROAD SEATTLE WA .!•! SOUTH 162304-9142-01 BADER D 13660 MILITARY R0 SEATTLE WA:, 4 • , 819993 98163 317777 9816.3 162304-9157703, MCDANIEL'MATTHEWL+LINDA M 43999( C 13621 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE WA' 96168 162304-9162-06 • C,‘,„;;;;1.623S, 164 2R1--;,---RmEep.a.-Pce;NITEQ,,C,M ET H" eCH--6871:7-7—' , N•Ss":0 5'46 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director November 3, 1994 Dr. Michael Silver, Superintendent South Central School District 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 FAX 244 -8602 RE: Cascade View Elementary School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Showalter Middle School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Dear Mr. Silver, The City has reviewed the environmental checklists and determinations noted above and has the following comments on the proposals. Cascade View Elementary SEPA DNS Prior to issuance of any permits and inconjunction with the conditional use permit, the following items will be required: 1. Storm water Drainage Permit. The applicant must describe the volume of storm water discharge, capacity of detention and provide oil /water separators where deemed necessary. 2. Utility and Street Use Permit. 3. The applicant will be required to reimburse the City for the construction cost of public street frontal improvements, including curb, gutter and Sidewalk, along 32nd Avenue between 135th St. and approximately -13Th St. 4. Automatic fire sprinklers will be required by e Fire Department. 5. Additional fire hydrants will need to be installed at locations approved by the Fire Department. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 Showalter Middle School Prior to issuance of any permits, the City will require the following: 1. Any increase in storm water runoff will require retention /detention in compliance with the King County Storm water Management Manual. The utility plans need to indicate where and how the on -site stormwater collection system will be connected to the public storm water system located in Macadam Road S. 2. Additional fire hydrants will be required. 3. .Fire alarm. and sprinkler systems are required to be installed. 4. Fire lanes are required to support 70,000 pounds. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these proposals. Sincerely, Libby Y!udson Associate Planner -1 Je To: Libby Hudson, Planning Division From: Joanna Spencer, Assistant PW Development Engineer Date: Subject: November 1, 1994 Cascade View Elementary School Conditional Use, Design Review,SEPA Activity Nos. L94 -0071 & L94 -0069 Review Comments The above application was reviewed by Public Works on 10/21/94. Our comments are for design review and SEPA only as follows: Design Review: SEPA Review: Request sign next to biofiltration swale be provided that educates children as to what this bioswale does to help water quality. This same sign is being put at new Tukwila library and could be copied. - Page 3. Item 10: Add: Storm Drainage Permit Utility and Street Use Permits - Page 6. Item a, 6):Describe the volume of discharge and types of wastes /how treated consistent with your answer on page 7, Item c, 2). - Page 7. Item d.: Add oil /water separator (in proposed Type II MH.). If you have any questions, please let me know. JJS /jjs cf: Development file RECEJV t-' NOV 0 2 1994 Gu1V11vivtV1I Y DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Project name: Cascade View Elementary School Project Application No: L94 - 0069 Additional information Date: October 17, 1994 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE The proposed Project consists of additions and modernization of an existing elementary school. The original Cascade View Elementary School was built as four buildings connected by covered walkways in 1957. Additions and modernization are planned to meet the current and projected program needs for 400 students, Kindergarten through Fifth Grade, plus Preschool. Two four -room portable buildings currently on site are used as instructional space and will be removed. Their uses will be incorporated into the new school building. The 29,589 square feet existing school plus covered walkways will be modernized. The existing structure will receive seismic upgrades, new insulation, window and doors replacement, and a new pitched roofs. All spaces will receive new mechanical and electrical systems, new finishes and new equipment. Additions of 31,041 square feet are planned in several areas. A 4200 sf Gymnasium will be built on the northeast corner of the existing facility, adjacent to the existing Multi- purpose Room. A 20,256 sf classroom addition will be located on the west side of the existing school, consisting of new Library, Preschool, Kindergarten and First Grade classrooms and Music Room. The classroom addition has been configured with the existing buildings to enclose a large central outdoor courtyard, meant to focus the whole school toward a new "heart", and create a clear organization of the whole facility. New covered walkways are planned for the front (east) side and at the junctions between buildings. Sitework includes a reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking, new fire lane, utility upgrades, storm drainage, landscaping, new sidewalks and new playgrounds. The current small parking lot will be revised. The bus and car driveways will be separated so as to provide order and safety to the traffic flow on a very limited and congested existing street access. Busses will travel a new one way loop at the present main entry to the school. The new car driveway will weave along the north side of the site to a turn- around near the new Library, thus defining a second entrance to the school. A new paved playground and play equipment area is planned to the south of the building, and may include a covered play structure. Architectural form, revised traffic patterns, and landscape have been carefuly considered in order to improve the clarity of the movement through the campus, and to enhance the identity of the school both as a vital civic landmark and as an inviting place for learning. 10 A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated The proposal will not be materially detrimental to the property or improvements in the vicinity. Many aspects of the new project will in fact improve upon existing conditions. Security will be enhansed by fencing off of the interior courtyards of the school, and with improved lighting throughout the site. Lighting has been designed so as to provide adequate light for security, but not to spill on to neighboring property. Landscape planting provides buffers to residential roperties on the north, west and south sides of the school. 10 B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. All aspects of the proposed use will meet current code. With respect to Fire and Life Safety Issues, the modernization will be brought up to current Building Codes, along with the new additions. For example, structural improvements are planned to meet current seismic regulations; all kitchen and toilet facilities will be replaced and reconfigured to meet Health Department and ADA regulations; new fire lane, improved water service meet Fire Department requirements and a new automatic fire sprinkler system throughout exceed the Fire District minimum requirements. City of Tukwila Title 18 Zoning Code regulations will be met and exceeded. The building Yard and Area Regulations have been met. The height for all buildings, including the new gymnasium is under the 30 foot limitation. Parking on site has been increased to meet Code. Planned landscape exceeds the Code requirements by providing a buffer along perimeters bounded by nearby residences. IOC. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Although the project does propose an increase in building area, the proposal in not a change in use, nor is it an increase in number of users. The school population will remain the same. The current traffic and pedestrian circulation demands will not change or increase as a result of the proposed use. A "Traffic Impact Analysis" has been prepared for use in planning this proposal by Perteet Engineering. The proposed site layout will make the existing traffic and pedestrian patterns function more clearly and more safely. Bus and auto traffic will be separated in the new scheme, thus avoiding confusion that now exists. Parking will be distributed so as not to conflict with traffic flow, and the number of stalls increased to meet current code. Pedestrian routes will be clearly marked. Students will wait for busses in a protected area, out of traffic, and walkways will cross as few driveways as possible. New sidewalks along the street are proposed, where none now exist, and crosswalks will be clearly marked. Cascade View Elementary School The proposed building and site design is compatible with surrounding uses. The surrounding properties are small, single family residences. The building additions have been planned as one storey, and building massing has been screened and set back so as not to be incompatible with the scale of neighboring residences. Materials and colors have been selected to blend with the scale and character of the neighborhood. 10D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The following responses refer to relevant policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan: Natural Environment, Objective 1, Policy 1: There is an area of steep slope, class 2, on the west edge of the site. No new development will occur in this area. N.E., 01, P2: There is an abundance of live vegetation in the proposed landscape plan. N.E., 01, P3: There are existing madrona and fir trees on the site, many of which must be removed for the new addition. As many trees as possible are to be saved, but many of the Madrona trees are in very poor condition. These trees will be removed or trimmed so as not to pose a danger from falling limbs. N.E., 03, P2: The proposal has been planned for one storey, so as to preserve the views from the neighbors. N.E., 03, P4: Considerable excavation must occur to accommodate the new building. The fill material will be reused on site where practicable, and the excess disposed off site. N.E., 06, P1: A Geotechnical Engineer has tested the site and prepared a report outlining precautions to be taken in site modification. The Contractor will submit an erosion control plan for use during construction to the Building Official prior to permitting. Open Space, Objective 1, Policy 3: Active recreation areas (two softball fields, one soccer field, two play structures, and paved playgrounds) are existing and will be upgraded. The Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department has agreed to participate in the upgrading of these facilities for community use. Additionally, a new gymnasium has been incorporated into the Projet for school use, and also for community use. O.S., 01, P4 &5: the Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department may locate a picnic area at this site. (At present an Alternate, depending on Bid costs) O.S., 01, P6: The open space will be buffered from neighboring residences with some new plantings. Cascade View Elementary School O.S., 02 & 3, General: A walking trail is planned for the entire perimeter of the site, linking already established pathways from off site on to the site. This trail will be an Alternate in the Bid Documents for this project, and will be constructed if funding allows. Residence, Objective 1, Policy 1 &2: Though not an "incompatible" use, the proposal will be buffered from close neighbors with landscaping, and will be minimal in height so as to minimize impact off site. The play fields buffer the proposal from other surrounding neighbors. R, 01, P4: Though traffic will not increase, the proposal circulates traffic more on site than is currently being done. R, 01, P6: New perimeter trail and new sidewalks at the street will improve pedestrian safe passage between residences and the proposal. R, 04, General: The new proposal will improve the security of the existing school by adding adequate light to parking areas and the immediate building site ( while not adversely affecting the neighbors). The proposal also contains an ornamental gate system which will prevent access into the middle of the school building cluster off hours. Transportation/Utilities, Objective 1, Policy 1: As stated above, traffic routing has been revised in the proposal to minimize conflict between traffic and parked vehicles. T., 01, P2: Maneuvering of vehicles will occur on site. T., 01, P4: Design of roads will be designed to current standards. T., 01, P12: In early planning a fire lane was proposed to circle the new building around the east side. Still meeting Fire Department requirements, this road was deleted because of the detrimental effect of the added grading on the existing natural environment in that area of the site. T, 06,P1: An interconnected network of sidewalks is proposed around the school site, connected with a pathway system that continues around the play fields. T.,06,P2: As described above, the new plan separates car, bus, pedestrian traffic and allows for safe staging of pedestrians at bus and car drop off zones. T.,06,P3: New sidewalks are proposed along the street and pathways are proposed which better link residences to the school. T.,06,P4: New walkways will meet accessibility standards. T.,06,P8: Lighting, signage, proper setbacks, and ample staging areas for pedestrians have Cascade View Elementary School been incorporated into the design. T, 03,4,5, General: Water and sanitary sewer will be connected to existing systems. All will meet the criteria of the water and sewer districts. T.,O6,General: Storm water will be handled by a combination pipe and non - structural (bio- filtration swale) system, and will meet all jurisdictional requirements. T., 08, General: Electrical and Communications systems will be undergrounded from the street. Design must be cost effective. 10E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The proposal has addressed adverse impacts that exist in the area now, and mitigated them. Such impacts are the congestion of car, bus and pedestrian parking and drop -off, and the general run -down nature of all the existing building, landscape, and play facilities. The proposal includes a significant increase in area of new buildings and the proposal applies the same principles relative to minimizing adverse impacts to the new addition as to the existing. Cascade View Elementary School PARKING ANALYSIS PARKING REQUIRED STAFF 5q EVENT &O PARKING PROPOSED: PERMANENT ON SITE , 5.G EVENT BUS LOOP 9 GAR DROP 5' Note; PERI4A -Ne-N r Fk6 r) LJvE (2) ASEssr'C3L 5 PACA55 PAW N& C41CMA.T<D111 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works ❑ Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project: COLS Cadte V/ J /Mlle/0 � .SC:1 •Cc1i / l��c..�/I Address: 1 3Coc / 2 /----c/ a ve • SOU transmitted: C1/2Date 1r7 9 `� Response requested by: /0/ /0/q 471 Staff coordinator: / / {•, r labvi ' �, /% •1 Date response received: COMMENTS �o- SVPIO rR v �ti� js �� (uoc;i vc Iod .I, 0 1 '147 ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: 03/14/94 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director November 22, 1994 Mr. Gary Goltz Heery International, Inc. 1601 Avenue D. Snohomish, WA 98290 RE: Cascade View Elementary School (L94 -0069 & L94 -0071) Conditional Use and Board of Architectural Review Showalter Middle School (L94 -0074) Board of Architectural Review approval Dear Mr. Goltz The Planning Commission and Design Review Board held a public hearing for the above noted projects on November 17, 1994. Following are the decisions of the hearings. Cascade View Elementary School The Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use for Cascade View Elementary School (L94 -0069) with the following conditions: 1. If there is a demonstrated, consistent after -hours parking demand which exceeds the 80 stall capacity for the school, the matter shall be reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may at that time require the School District to construct, to zoning code standards and within a reasonable period of time, additional on -site parking as determined necessary to accommodate school events. These spaces shall be in a location as shown on the site plan a "event overflow parking ", or as determined by the Commission. The Board of Architectural Review approved the design review for Cascade View Elementary School (L94- 0071)' with the following conditions: Prior to application of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval to the Department of Community 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Development the following: 1. A revised landscape plan (Formerly condition 1. in the staff report) A. To provide an attractive appearance, require the removal and undergrounding of overhead lines to the building. B. To assure healthy vegetation, specify an irrigation plan for all new areas of trees and /or shrubs. Install a second bench to protect the other oak tree near the bus loading area. C. To preserve views of the Cascades, specify deciduous trees for the area adjacent to the street frontage. D. To buffer new structures and parking areas from the westerly neighbors, provide an additional 9 trees (mixed evergreen and deciduous at 2" caliper) and shrubs along the westerly end of the property. 2. Revised site lighting plan (formerly condition 3.) A. To ensure compatibility with the surrounding residences, reduce the wattage of fixtures for the parking lot lighting to 250 watts or less, unless there is satisfactory evidence provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. Regardless of wattage, restrict the distribution of exterior lighting to 0 -5 lumens at the property line. B. For safety and security, provide nighttime illumination of walkways and southern parking areas. 3. Mechanical equipment (new condition) Provide rooftop screening of HVA equipment which is designed to be compatible with building architecture to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 4. Gymnasium exterior (new condition) The brick replacing the stucco exterior on the gymnasium must be of a compatible color with the entire project and the brick -work on the columns. Showalter Middle School The Board of Architectural Review approved the design review for Showalter Middle School (L94 -0074) with the following conditions: Prior to application of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Board of Architectural Review the following: 2 1. A revised landscape plan. (formerly condition 4. A. & C. in the staff report) A. To enhance architectural features of the east facade of Building "A," install maples or other tall trees in a pattern that lines up with either the bays of the windows or with the columns between the windows. B. To moderate the visual impact of large paved areas, include perimeter landscaping of trees and shrubs between the eastern parking lot and the property line. This should extend from the north edge of the relocated portable approximately 260 feet to the point where the parking aisles turn and head northwest. 2. A revised set of color board(s) Provide revised colors that are bold for all facades, including and the work garage. (formerly condition 1. A.) consistently contrasting and those of the storage trailer Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department the following: 1. A revised set of elevations (formerly condition 1. B., and new condition) A. To achieve consistency, use window and door details such as circles and rectangles that reflect the 1930's style. :..•..rY•:i•:' ? {.`.i:•i;J ;;Lt:::.v: mn; :::•::::.._ _ ::e:... _.. •: n:•�:v :�. +...:........ :.x: ;•::::n:v.:..u:::::::•, :v .:•:.:;. ..:........,.,...:........_ _ _.... ::bii : ?y,:J v.:.Y: � iii:•:;:0: +': .....rvn.. r........•........., x.. .:: i1R•:.'• >::.• w::: v: ?v: ::4i'v: .v::.: ::.:v:.;:::::: n.v.v:::::.v ;.::::::::.:�.v:.:v: •v: r• n....n.n...: 1..:... Q�3 B. Add additional canopies over doorways, and insure that there is a canopy on the west entrance of Building "A ". 2. site lighting details. (formerly condition 3.) To provide lighting compatible with the adjacent area, use reduced wattage of the fixtures. In the parking lot, restrict lighting to 250 watts or less unless there is satisfactory evidence provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. Restrict the lighting distribution to 0 -5 lumens at the property line. 3 3. A revised landscape plan. (formerly condition 4. B,D,E,& F.) A. To protect plantings from injury provide details which show how the planter areas will be protected from high pedestrian traffic in the vicinity of the plaza, notably the planter immediately outside the west student entry, and the planter area outside the south side of Building "D." B. To screen the service yard and work garage area, provide a screen of materials acceptable to the Department of Community Development, to be located where it will moderate views from 144th Street. C. To enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape, remove or underground overhead power lines. These include power lines along the north side of Buildings "A" "C" and "D," and along the northeast side of the parking lot. Substitute consistently designed (eg., Kim) lighting fixtures for any present exterior cobra - headed lights. D. To provide an inviting and stable appearance, provide benches under the canopy of the east entry to Building "A." The decision of the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review is final unless appealed to the City Council by November 28, 1994. We can schedule appearance before the Board of Architectural Review for December 15, 1994, as you requested. If you have any questions regarding these projects, please feel free to contact me at 431 -3673. Sincerely, Libby Hudson Associate Planner C: Dr. Michael Silver, Superintendent 4 HEERY November 23, 1994 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Regarding: Dear Jack: Jack Pace SEPA Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) Cascade Vew`Elementary nd Showalter Middle School Architecture Construction Management Engineering Graphic Design Inlenor Design Program Management Strategic Facilities Planning We have reviewed your November 9, 1994 letter regarding SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School. We concur with the comments stated in this letter and will proceed with design using your information as parameters. It should be noted that subject to the receipt of additional information from the City, we will be extending curb, gutter and sidewalks for Cascade View along 32nd Avenue South between 135th Street and 137th Street, not 136th Street as noted in your letter. We appreicate your review and comments and will see that these elements are incorporated in the design. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, cc: Kirstine Whisler, SCSD Nancy Kaynor, BA Mike Finnegan, HI SCSD - CV - a(H), DD SCSD - SMS - a(H), DD g:\ user\ public \projs\scsd■corrs \0079.;Itr Heery International, Inc. A group of probsslonal ssrvks practices 10900 NE 110 Street Suits 1110, BeTevue, Washington 90004 Telephone 206.154.9703 Fax 206.151.5126 ATLANTA BALTIMORE BOSTON CHARLOTTE CLEVELAND DEFNER HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MEXICO CITY MIAMI NEW YORK ORLANDO PIIIIADELPHIA PORTLAND SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE VANCOUVER WASHINGTON DC . -1 5u, Li -0070 2 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development John W. Rants, Mayor November 3, 1994 Rick Beeler, Director Dr. Michael Silver, Superintendent South Central School District 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 FAX 244 -8602 RE: Cascade View Elementary School SEPA Determination of .Nonsignificance (DNS) Showalter Middle School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Dear Mr. Silver, The City has reviewed the environmental checklists and determinations noted above and has the following comments on the proposals. Cascade.View Elementary SEPA DNS Prior to issuance of any permits. and inconjunction with the conditional use permit, the following items will be required:. 1. Storm water Drainage Permit. The applicant must describe the volume of storm water discharge, capacity of detention and provide oil /water separators where deemed necessary. 2. Utility and Street Use Permit. 3. The applicant will be required to reimburse the City for the construction cost of public street frontal improvements, including curb, gutter and Sidewalk, along 32nd Avenue between 135th St. and approximately ?3 -S-th St. 4. Automatic fire sprinklers will be required by the Fire Department. 5. Additional fire hydrants will need to be installed at locations approved by the Fire Department. Showalter Middle School • Prior to issuance of any permits, the City will require the following: 1. Any increase in storm water runoff will require retention /detention in compliance with the King County Storm water Management Manual. The utility plans need to . indicate where and how the on -site stormwater collection system will be connected to the public storm water system located in Macadam Road S. 2. Additional fire hydrants will be required. 3. •Fire. alarm. and sprinkler systems are required to be installed. 4. Fire lanes are required to support 70,000 pounds. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these proposals. Sincerely, . ; • Libby Hudson Associate Planner October 24, 1994 Gary Goltz Herry International, Inc. 10900 NE 4th Street, Suite 1110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: SEPA Determinations for Showalter Middle School and Cascade Elementary School: ry4tirtiy} `' ;' View I appreciate you forwarding the SEPA determinations for the schools . which the City had not previously received. We received the two Determinations of Nonsignificance's on October 19, 1994. As discussed on the phone today, the School District, as lead agency, has extended the comment period to November 2, 1994. Because the City is not the lead agency but . rather an agency of jurisdiction, the City is required to be notified by the lead agency upon SEPA determination. I will forward the SEPA comments as soon as possible.. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Libby Hudson Associate Planner C: South Central School District Bob Betts HEERY November 23, 1994 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Jack Pace Regarding: SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School Dear Jack: We have reviewed your November 9, 1994 letter regarding SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School. We concur with the comments stated in this letter and will proceed with design using your information as parameters. It should be noted that subject to the receipt of additional information from the City, we will be extending curb, gutter and sidewalks for Cascade View along 32nd Avenue South between 135th Street and 137th Street, not 136th Street as noted in your letter. We appreicate your review and comments and will see that these elements are incorporated in the design. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, HEER NTERNATIO INC Gary :Itz Program Ma er cc: Kirstine Whisler, SCSD Nancy Kaynor, BA Mike Finnegan, HI SCSD - CV - a(H), DD SCSD - SMS - a(H), DD g: \user\public\projs\scsd\Corrs \0079. ; Itr fir:(' 2, Heery International, Inc. A group 01 prolesslonal i,Mce practices 10900 NE 4th Street. Suite 1110. Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone 206.4549707 Fax 206454.5726 ATLANTA BALTIMORE BOSTON CHARLOTTE CLEVELAND DENVER HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MEXICO CITY MIAMI NEW YORK ORLANDO PHILADELPHIA PORTLAND SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE VANCOUVER WASHINGTON DC Architecture Construction Management Engineering Graphic Design Interior Design Program Management Strategic Facilities Plammmq PER1 ET ENGINEERIN Civil and Transportation Consultants 2828 Colby Avenue, Suite 410 Everett, WA 98201 September 28, 1994 Mr. Ron Cameron, P.E. City Engineer City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Associate Planner Department of Community Development Planning 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 INC. (206) 252 -7233 FAX: 339 -6018 RECEIVED '297994 D VELOPJ MENT RE: Cascade View. Elementary and Showalter Middle School Traffic Impact Study Dear Ron and Vernon: I received a call from Ralph Rohwer with Heery International Inc. who is working for the South Central School District on the remodel and additions to the above referenced schools. He informed me that the staff from Tukwila Planning has stated in their review of the traffic impact analysis that they have found the study to be incomplete. I have reviewed my notes in our project file and found that, based on phone conversations with you, existing and future parking demands during the day and the evening were of major concern. Traffic flows were not identified as a potential problem. Therefore, the study focused on existing parking and future parking increases which could result from the proposed projects. Parking surveys were made, future trip increases identified, and parking impacts identified based on input from the School District and our limited survey of on and off street parking at these two locations. Showalter Middle School was estimated to have 108 additional vehicular staff trips and Cascade View Elementary School did not anticipate any increase in staff or student trips. Traffic level -of- service analyses were not made. School trips do not coincide with peak trips. The reports were then submitted to the City. Page 2 South Central School District Letter September 28, 1994 Please let me know if I misinterpreted our conversations or if you need additional information for the traffic study. I can be reached at 252 -7233. Sincerely, PERTEET ENGINEERING, INC. Donald H. Carr, P.E. Associate cc: Ralph Rohwer SCHOOL DISTRICT 406 Qut�, c9ent'irai.KING COUNTY • 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 -4196 WAC 197 -11 -970 Determination of nonsignficiance (DNS). DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: • Phone: 244 -2100 Renovation and addition to:Cascade View', Elem . .m entary,School Proponent: South Central School District No. 406 Location of proposal, including street address: 13601 32nd Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 • Lead agency: South Central School District The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have. a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This DNS is issued under 197.11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by October 17 1994. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Dr. Michael Silver POSITION / TITLE: Superintendent ADDRESS: 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Date: disk 41 \docs \cuscade.dns City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development STAFF REPORT to the PLANNING COMMISSION and to the BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW HEARING DATE: PROJECT / NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: SEPA DETERMINATION: STAFF: Preparers November 9, 1994 Rick Beeler, Director November 17, 1994 Cascade View Elementary School L94 -0069, L94 -0071 South Central School District No. 406 I. Conditional Use Permit II. Design Review 13601 - 32nd Avenue South, Tukwila, WA Approximately 8.9 acres R -1 - 7200 Single Family Public Facilities A determination of non - significance was issued by the District on September 29, 1994 Libby Hudson 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 0. (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 �, Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission ATTACHMENTS: L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 2 A. Conditional Use & Design Review Applications, c. 8/17/94 B. Cover sheet with perspectives A0.1 (8/17/94) C. Topographic survey (Penhallegon 5/20/94) ) D. Demo -Site Plan A1.1 (6/9/94) E. Utility and Drainage Plan C1.1 (8/8/94) F. Grading and Paving Plan C1.2 (8/8/94) G. Planting Plan - Design Development L1.1 (10/31/94) H. Courtyard Plan L2.1 (10/31/94) I. Site Plan A1.2 (plot 11/9/94) J. Exterior Elevations. A3.3, 3.4,3.5 (8/15 - 3 sheets) K. Design details for lighting, dumpster screening, mechanical equipment screening, bike racks, etc.. (no dates -slip sheets) L. Exterior Colors and Finishes [Materials Board] M. Traffic Impact [parking] Analysis (Perteet Engineering c. July 25, 1994) N. Color xeroxes of perspectives of east facade, of the interior courtyard, and of three exterior facades. (no date) Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission FINDINGS BACKGROUND L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 3 1. Project description: This project entails the renovation and substantial additions to an existing elementary school in order to meet current and projected needs for 400 kindergarten through fifth grade students. Additions comprise approximately 31,041 square feet, some of which replace four portable structures. A 4,200 square foot gymnasium will be added to Building "B." Most of the additions will be in an entirely new structure, Building "E." This will house music rooms, classrooms, kindergarten and a 'resource center. The new structure forms a U- shaped end to a courtyard, one that extends from the main entrance between Buildings "A" and "B." Exterior finish will be a stucco system for the additions, because of the unavailability of the block veneer used in the original buildings. When completed, the project will contain approximately 55,564 square feet, which more than doubles its present 24,523 square feet. The height of the complex will be less than 30 feet. Parking will be increased from its present 47 spaces to a total of 100. Of these, 56 will be permanent stalls on site. There will be an additional 45 "event" spaces. Of them 32 will be on turf, 8 will use the bus loop, and 5 will be in the "car drop" area. The main parking lot will be substantially relocated as part of this program. New driveway entrances will be 34 feet wide, to allow for bus and truck movements. There will also be a separate 20 foot wide fire lane to serve the south side of the complex. The current staff of 36 full time people will increase to 39 in the near future. With the exception of the kindergarten play area, all playground equipment will be relocated to the south of the complex. They will be installed on the northern edge of the present playfields. Thirty five of the 41 mature trees on the site will be removed by the proposed renovation project; many of these are diseased, especially the madronas. A combination of tulip trees and red oaks are proposed as a replacement. One of two existing ball fields will be removed in order to accommodate both Building "E" and the relocated playground equipment. A shelter is proposed to cover a set of basketball courts in this new play area. A gravel wallcing path will surround the playfields. It will also provide access to 32nd Ave at the southeast corner. A similar path will cross the western side of the site adjacent to the Kindergarten tot -lot. New signs for the school will be submitted as a separate application at a later date. Loading and dumpster areas will be screened, as well as any rooftop mechanical equipment. The Tukwila Parks Department is considering the installation of a Picnic Shelter on the site as a cooperative facility for serving the playfields in off - school hours. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 4 2. Site Description: The 9 -acre site consists of two terraces, one for playfields, the other for school structures and parking. There are prominent views of the Cascades to the east of the site. 3. Surrounding Land Uses: Single family residences. 4. Terrain: The proposed improvements will be located in an area graded for the existing facilities. Land here slopes at a modest one per cent grade up approximately six feet from east to west, and two feet from north to south. Playfields have a similar slope, and are about 10 feet above the level where the school buildings are located. Even with this slight change in grade, excavation will be needed to accommodate the footprint of Building "E." Plans show lowering the grade at this point approximately 10 feet, which is low enough to permit the new structure to connect by ramps to buildings "C" and "D." 5. Access is from 32nd Avenue, a two lane asphalt street having neither curbs, gutters, or sidewalks along its entire length. Three new access points will replace the existing pair of driveways. New sidewalks will be installed along the entire street frontage. Striped crosswalks are shown across the drives and across 32nd Ave. Grades of walkways throughout the campus are designed to promote accessibility for people with disabilities. 6. Public Facilities include the nearby Riverton Methodist Church, the Riverton Crest Cemetery, and the extension campus for Central Washington University. This latter campus used to be the Glacier High School. Overhead utility lines provide service to the elementary school complex. 7. Public Review is required for the proposed project in two parts. A conditional use permit review will address the issues of a significant expansion of an existing public school located within a residential zone. Design review will address the site and architectural impact of the proposed site renovations and additions. Both of the review criteria are included in this combined report. I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS DECISION CRITERIA Conditional Use Criteria are shown in bold, italic type along with a staff discussion. The Applicant's response to the criteria is contained in Attachment A. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94- 0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 5 Review Criteria (Tukwila Municipal Code 18.64.050) Criteria 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. An elementary school is permitted in residential zones subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Although Cascade View's size (55,500+ square feet) exceeds those of adjoining residential structures, the proposed additions are customary ones for such schools. The 4,200 square foot gym has been set back 85 feet from 32nd Avenue. The major new structure (20,256 sf) will be located over 300 feet from the public right of way, behind the existing structures. It is also located over 60 feet from the nearest property line. The original four structures and their covered walkways were built in 1957 and are in need of substantial modernization, including removal of hazardous materials such as asbestos. Security will be enhanced by fencing off the interior courtyard, and by providing nighttime lighting in the parking areas. Additional landscape planting will screen residential properties on the north and south sides of the school. Criteria 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. The proposed development plans for the school, plus the attached conditions meet the performance standards in the R -1 - 7200 zoning district. This includes designing to seismic standards, abating hazardous materials complying with Disability Act requirements, and meeting Fire Code specifications. Proposed perimeter landscaping will exceed those required by the zoning code. Overhead utility lines will be undergrounded, thus reducing visual clutter. The site plan shows 56 permanent stalls for the 55,564 square foot facility. The standards in the zoning code require 59, based on the calculation of 1.5 spaces per staff member, assuming a future full -time staff of 39. There will be a shortage of 3 spaces from that required by the zoning code. Parking studies by Perteet Engineering (Attachment M) indicate that .peak usage of the existing 47 spaces at the present school is 83 %. That rate of usage is based on an existing full-time staff of 36 plus an additional 10 itinerant staff. The Perteet report notes, "There is no spill-over parking from the school onto the surrounding streets during normal school hours." Attachment M, p.3. Site plans provide an additional 45 parking spaces for "public assembly." The basis for this requirement is that there will be a total of 7,990 square feet of Public Assembly space created by this modernization program. About half of this will be the multi- purpose rooms and the other half will be gymnasium space. Zoning requires 1 space for each 100 square feet, such that a total of (7,990 / 100 =) 80 spaces will be required. Of this figure (80), 56 are already provided in the parking lot at the north side Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission Page 6 of the school. The balance (80 -56 = ) 24 will be located in two areas. Ten (10) would be located out of the fire lanes on the asphalt play area. An additional 14 spaces would be provided in the bus drop -off area (9) and the car drop -off area (5). The zoning code requires striping and wheel stops for these spaces. Technically there will be a shortage of 10 on -site parking spaces because those proposed for the asphalt playground would be unstriped. Perteet notes, It is expected that [during] after - school events, parking will spill over into the adjacent neighborhood." Attachment M, p.4. L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Criteria 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Circulation will be enhanced by separating bus and car traffic. Students will have new covered walkways. Security access will be improved by installation of an asphalt fire lane to the south side of the building. There will be both car and bus drop -off zones in the parking areas. New sidewalks will be added along the entire street frontage. Striped crosswalks will be provided at the driveway entrances and at the intersection with 136th Street. Site design will also feature the installation of a new storm drainage system and automatic irrigation system. These two features should enhance water quality, and protect planting areas. The proposed building design will transform a set of flat - roofed structures to ones with gabled roofs, bay windows and bright colors. These and the new classroom/library/ structure will be organized around a new 200+ foot central courtyard. Views of the Cascades from the existing structures will be maintained. The major addition (Building "E ") will be set into the ground such that its height and mass will be diminished when seen from its neighbors to the west. Criteria 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The proposed modernization is supported by many goals in the Land Use Policy Plan. These include: Natural Environment Goals 1 (Gauge development of the land in a manner suitable to the natural environment) and 2 (Use and preserve the natural features and resources of the physical environment in a wise and posterity- oriented manner.) Open Space Goal 3 (provide meaningful recreational opportunity for all people of Tukwila regardless of sex, age, color, or socioeconomic status Residence Goal 1 (Preserve the pleasantness and integrity of viable single -family areas.) The applicant has noted specific objectives and policies within the Plan's sections that address Natural Environment, Open Space, and Residence. See Attachment A, reply to Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission question 10D. L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 7 Criteria 5. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The proposal includes measures to remedy a series of impacts, such as seismic, fire safety, aesthetics. These were mentioned in the responses to criteria 1, 2, and 3, above. Perimeter landscaping along the parking lot will screen this area from adjacent residences. New trees along the west and south sides are intended to filter and moderate views of the structures. Perimeter landscaping along the 20 fire access road will buffer views from adjoining residences. Spill-over parking is likely to occur during off -hour events, and may require additional improvements to the site. CONCLUSIONS Conclusions are grouped under the review criteria. Criteria 1. Reconstruction of this school is a public benefit. The proposal creates no material injury to public welfare or nearby property. The proposed gym, library, music rooms and other features are necessary for the functioning of a school. Criteria 2. The proposal conforms to height and set -back standards in the zoning district. Buildings are below the 30 foot height limit New additions are generously set back from property lines. Even the major facility (the west U- shaped structure) will be built some 11 feet below the grade of the nearest property line, making it relatively unobtrusive from its western neighbors. The zoning code's requirement of 1.5 parking spaces per staff member is adequate for day -time use of the facility. Even if the number (56) is short three (3) from required by the code, the plan contains 14 drop -off spaces, which is a safety factor to provide enough extra spaces for part-time staff, visitors, and service people. Further, the consultant's report on parking demand demonstrates that the present parking lot has nearly 20% excess capacity. Provisions for event -type parking, however, may be inadequate to prevent spill -over impacts in the neighborhood. Eighty (80) stalls are required for event parking, and this number is partly met by the 56 stalls in the parking lot. That number (56,) plus 5 drop -off and 9 bus -load spaces would create 56 +5 +9 = 70 spaces on site. The zoning code requires an additional 80 -70 = 10 spaces. Vehicles could be parked on the nearby asphalt playground area, using the 20' wide fire road for access. If adequate signs and other improvements are installed this appears to be sufficient for such high- demand events. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 8 Criteria 3. Provisions for landscaping, height and setbacks already meet or exceed the performance standards in the R -1 zoning district. The proposal's design features will be compatible once they have been given Board of Architectural Review approval. The one -story buildings, their colors and materials blend well with the neighborhood. Criteria 4. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan. It provides meaningful recreation opportunities and adds to the integrity of single family areas. Criteria 5. With the exception of over -flow parking, the proposal minimizes adverse impacts on nearby property. As noted under Criteria 2 above, on -site parking is short 10 spaces from that required by code. Some of this conceivably could be accommodated on an informal basis within the asphalt portions of the playground, and out of the striped fire lanes. One alternative is to provide additional asphalt parking to the south of the play area; the other is to use the turf areas adjacent to the play area for this same purpose. Other possible impacts on adjoining areas have been evaluated and addressed in the Staff Report for the Design Review application. RECOMMENDATIONS The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the proposed project, subject to the following conditions: 1. If there is a demonstrated, consistent after -hours parking demand which exceeds the 80 stall capacity for the school, the matter shall be reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may at that time require the School District to construct, to zoning code standards and within a reasonable period of time, additional on -site parking as determined necessary to accommodate school events. These spaces shall be in a location as shown on the site plan as "event overflow parking," or as determined by the Commission. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 9 II DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS DISCUSSION The zoning code also requires the Board of Architectural Review to consider the specific design of the proposed school complex and its landscaping. GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA Board of Architectural Review Criteria are shown in bold type along with a staff discussion. The Applicant's response to the criteria is contained in Attachment A. Review Guidelines (Tukwila Municipal Code 18.60.050) 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. (A) The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; (B) Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; (C) The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. A. Transition consists of maintaining most existing grades. The site contains essentially two benches of land, each of which are nearly level, but are separated by a 10 foot difference in elevation. The northerly bench, fronting on 32nd Street, contains all the buildings. The southerly bench contains the playfields and playgrounds. Transition between the two is proposed to be at a maximum 4:1 slope, and can be reached by either an asphalt fire access road or by a set of stepped walkways. B. Most parking will be moved to the north side of the buildings, moderating their visual impact as seen from the street. The new parking area will have an 8' wide landscaped area located along the north property line. This will be planted with Japanese pines, shore pines, and red cedars to screen and buffer views from adjoining private residences. Along 32nd Avenue a bus turnaround and 12 stalls will be located behind a wide (25') planter area. The planter will contain seven scarlet oaks to provide modest screening, but to still allow views of the Cascades. C. New structures are located a minimum of 70 feet from the nearest property line. This is at least 40 feet more than required by zoning. The large U- shaped Building "E" will be set at an elevation approximately 11 feet below the grade at the nearest (West) property line, thus minimizing its impact on views. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 10 Proposed heights of all structures are within the 30 foot height limit allowed by the zoning code. This is because the code calculates height from average finished grade to the mid -point of any sloped roof. The top of the roof of the Gym addition to Building "B" is shown at 31' -8," and the top of the roof to the Music/Library complex of Building . "E" is shown at 23' -6." Midpoints for the roofs to these two buildings are thus under the 30 -foot height limit. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. (A) Harmony in texture, lines and masses is encouraged. (B) Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; (C) Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character, (D) Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; (E) Compatibility of on site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. A. All existing and proposed buildings will have new roofs installed at a 4/12 slope, giving a consistent silhouette to the complex. Roofing materials may be either asphalt composition or metal. If asphalt shingles are used, an all-black roof will be used for the Gym and the Resource Center. All other roofs will be a reddish brown interspersed with individual black shingles. The design also uses a common fascia with a common color to help unify the appearance of the buildings. Stucco is proposed for the exterior walls of all new buildings, while existing structures will retain their block veneer. Facades to the new structures are not intended to express their stucco joints as score -marks for visual interest and unity. The resulting smooth wall texture will be in contrast to the existing rough appearance given by the block masonry veneer of the existing set of four structures. Columns at the bus -load walkway and at other entrances to the facility will have a dark red brick cladding above a grey concrete base. In contrast, all other columns, such as those found in the interior courtyard, are intended to have a smooth stucco appearance, and will be painted in colors to harmonize with adjacent facades. B. The proposed landscape transition will change from what is presently on the site. Most grades remain essentially the same, but prominent trees and vegetation will be dramatically different. Of the 41 mature trees on site, only six will be retained. The most obvious impact will be on views from private residences to the west of the site, not from the public right of way along 32nd Avenue. The planting plan (attachment G) proposes a line of tulip trees and two clusters of oaks as substitutes in the areas between the buildings and the west property line. To the north, the design shows a line of Japanese pines, red cedars, shore pines and shrubs along the north perimeter of the site. To the south, between the 20 foot asphalt fire lane and an existing residence, there will a line of shore pines and red cedars as a screen. Plantings are not proposed along the west or south property lines, which currently have grass and cyclone fencing. C. Established neighborhood character reflects a quality of styles found in any older Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 11 single- family detached residential area: pitched roofs, clapboard siding, occasional two story structures, a variety of gardens and front yards. Cascade View School's design, being single -story, containing somewhat sloped roofs, has some of these. features. Given its use as a public facility, however, the size and scale of the complex are necessarily larger than abutting residences. D, E. The site plan creates compatible patterns of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Overall, the concept is to keep most pedestrian movements either in the courtyard or to the south, where the play areas are located. Most vehicular movements will be contained within the north parking lot, including service vehicles for the cafeteria. This traffic will use two new driveways located approximately 170 feet apart. One is principally for bus drop -offs; the other is principally for service, staff and car use. The new bus drop -off area will have a covered walkway to protect pedestrians from rain. This walkway will lead through gates into a new central courtyard, which in turn provides the major pedestrian access to all buildings on the campus. All other entrances to this courtyard will have gates for security. New sidewalks along the street will have striping at the site's driveways. Similar striping will cross 32nd Avenue at the intersection with 136th Street. A third driveway into the site will be located along the south side of Building "A." It provides necessary emergency access, and it serves both the turf playfields and the asphalt play ground. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment. (A) Were existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; (B) Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; (C) Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axes, and provide shade. (D) In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor tragic, mitigating steps should be taken; (E) Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; (F) Screening of service yards and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer; (G) In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; (H) Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of re design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. A. The site's topography is proposed to remain essentially the same. Where grading occurs, it will be at a maximum 4:1 slope. See comments in section 4 of the Background section. A line of tulip trees will be located at the top of the southerly and westerly embankments, in order to provide shade for Buildings "A," "C," and "E." Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission Page 12 B. Grades of walkways are proposed to remain essentially the same around the present buildings. However, there will be a three -foot transition between existing structures ( "A, B, C, and D ") and the new addition. The transition will be achieved by a set of ramps on both sides of the U- shaped courtyard. The courtyard itself will contain a meandering -• "stream" of rocks that climb up this gentle grade. Shrubs, trees and some groundcover are proposed for this courtyard area, and are intended to make the "stream - scape" an •'• • inviting feature. Outside the complex of buildings, a handicap - accessible ramp will cross the 10 foot slope between the buildings and the outdoor play areas. L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View C. Enhancements include creation of the above - mentioned linear "stream - scaped" courtyard. This visual axis extends approximately 280 feet through the center of the complex, visually connecting the entry walkway to the most western component of the new complex. Significant vistas of the Cascades exist, especially in the winter, when deciduous trees drop their leaves. These views are principally available from the covered walkway at the bus loading area. D. The "stream- scaped" courtyard displays a curving pattern of concrete and rocks: clusters, pavers, benches. This design feature should prevent injury to plants, leaving root areas relatively protected from pedestrian traffic. Elsewhere, adjacent to the exterior of the buildings, trees and shrubs are generally bounded by concrete walks and curbs. At the northeast corner of Building "B," one of two proposed oak trees will be protected by benches. The other is not protected even though both are located within the sidewalk at a high traffic area. Most other trees are relatively removed from an active traffic zone. The proposed row of tulip trees on the south side of the school will be located on the embankment between the play areas and the school buildings. West of the new building "E," the Planting Plan • (Attachment G) shows other tulip trees located uphill and above the retaining wall for the tot play area. The only mention of an irrigation system for the project is for a quick coupling hose bibb system for the shrub /ground cover planting areas. Grass areas will be unirrigated. There is no discussion of the use of drought - tolerant plants for the planting plan. • E. The turnaround for the parking lot will contain a central planting area. This will be marked by a cluster of six Japanese black pines, set in a bed of Kinnikinnick, and flanked by cotoneaster and strawberry bushes. . F. The site plan (attachment I) shows a screened dumpster area between the new addition of Building "B" and existing building "D." Details are shown in attachment K. G. See 3D above. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View Page 13 H. The applicant has provided details on two types of proposed exterior lighting for the area. These are shown in attachment K. Walkways will have Kim "SAR" fixtures. Parking areas will have 30 foot high Kim "AR" fixtures. No lights are proposed for the south side of the complex. In the parking areas, two pairs of lights will be located at the bus drop -off zone, while six individual lights are proposed along the north property line. The Kim AR and SAR fixtures are designed to be used together. They have the same general profile, and their lamp housings are shielded, in order to minimize glare from the bulbs. Optics for these cut -offs will be adjusted when the fixtures are installed, to ensure the light is distributed properly, and away from adjoining property. The applicant indicates that the front entry arcade along with the other entry areas will be downlit to create a welcoming pool of light for nighttime users. 4. Building Design. (A) Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings; (B) Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; (C) Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; (D) Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; (E) Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; (F) Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; (G) Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. A, B. The scale of these structures is achieved by a combination of similar- sloped roofs, single -story character, and frequent variations to the walls. Harmony is further achieved by set -backs of over 70 feet from the nearest residence. With the exception of the common treatment of the fascia and roofs, colors and materials vary between the five structures. See comments in 2A, above. The applicant identifies the resulting style as "northwest modern." C. The applicant indicates the facility is designed for a 50 -year life. (Attachment A, p. 3, item 4C). Components include common window materials, common door details, and common exterior light fixtures. See attachment K. Columns to walkways, however, will be treated differently. .See Comment in 2A above. D. Proposed colors are identified in attachment L. The applicant has a detailed description of the exterior color palette in Attachment A page 3. The challenge is to work with the extensive amount of pinkish -gray brick veneer which forms the walls of all four existing structures. Taupe color was chosen here to blend with the existing brick. Three new buildings (Music Room, Resource Center and Gym) will be given special colors to emphasize their prominence as gathering spots. One will have gray- green, Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission Page 14 another will have a soft gold color, while the Gym will have a terra -cotta color; all will share the same dark green trim. Accents will be in the white windows and in the deep red fascia. Greatest contrast will occur between the white of window trim and the generally dark colors selected for the walls. The applicant has identified only the colors 7L- if composition shingles are used; colors for the metal roof alternative are not addressed. Roofs will express a similar concept as expressed in the facades. The three primary places (eg., gym, resource center) will have black composition shingles, while the others will have a dark brown appearance with mottled black accents. L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View E. Mechanical equipment will be contained within the roofs of most buildings. There will be some roof -top mounted HVAC units, although drawings do not show location of this mechanical equipment. Details for their screening are shown in Attachment K. F. Harmony in fixture design is intended by using a common set of lighting designs, and a common set of bench/ trash receptacle designs. See comment to 3 H, above. G. This complex of buildings is varied in bulk, in height, and in wall materials. Common colors and roof slopes are proposed as a unifying element. Contrasting colors are used selectively to identify structures of importance (music room, resource center and gym.) Staff's Response 5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture (A) Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible wish buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. (B) Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. A. Exterior signs are not being requested for this project at this time. The covered play area is shown as a separate feature in the applicant's submittal, and uses same 4/12 roof slopes and asphalt composition materials in the nearby buildings. Other common details are shown in attachment K, and relate to benches, receptacles, bike racks, and so on. A picnic structure may be needed by the City in the future to serve users of the playfields in off- school hours. B. Lighting design is shown in attachment K. Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission Page 15 L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View CONCLUSIONS The conclusions are grouped under the five principal design review guidelines. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. The proposed additions to these buildings provides a positive improvement to the relationship of the structure(s) to the site. The removal of portable structures and the addition of common- pitched roofs contribute to a coherent and tidy appearance. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. Proposed improvements are generally modest in appearance from the public street. New driveways, new landscaping and a new covered walkways are complemented by the addition of the gym to building "B" The gym itself is well located, making it easily accessible for the neighborhood. The major new structure, Building "E," is tucked into the west end of the site, well away from most views. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. Considering the vast amount of mature trees being removed as part of this project, the proposed landscape design is modest one. Given the intensive use of this facility, live landscaping has been restricted to relatively protected areas, such as the planters along the north sides of Buildings "D" and "E ". Lastly, the design for nighttime lighting needs to be detailed for the exterior areas that are on the south side of the building complex. 4. Building Design. The proposal relies on common roof slopes and common roof materials. It also relies on common color themes, although the metal roof alternative is not detailed. Colors for facades are vigorous and contrasting. Proposed window treatment is consistent, but walkway column treatment is not. Gutters and downspouts are addressed. The covered play area expresses common features with the buildings. 5. Miscellaneous Structures. The proposed structure over the play area matches the character of the buildings. Lighting fixtures remain consistent throughout the site, as do proposed benches, trash receptacles, and screening of roof -top mechanical equipment. RECOMMENDATIONS The Department of Community Development recommends approval of the proposed project subject to the following conditions: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department the Following: Staff Report to the BAR and Planning Commission Page 16 L94 -0069 & L94 -0071: Cascade View 1. A revised landscape plan. A. To provide an attractive appearance, require the removal and undergrounding of overhead lines to the building. B. To assure healthy vegetation, specify an irrigation plan for all new areas of trees and /or shrubs. Specify installation of an auto - irrigation system and installation of moisture sensors. Install a second bench to protect the other oak tree near the bus loading area. C. To preserve views of the Cascades, specify a tree species -eta for the area adjacent to the street frontage that drop their leaves in the Fall, rather than retain dead ones until the Spring. D. To buffer new structures and parking areas from the westerly neighbors, provide additional trees and shrubs along the westerly end of the property. 2.Revised building elevations. A. To ensure a good relationship between building components, use a set of common details for the columns of exterior walkways, especially a common color and style of bricks. B. For consistency in design, submit samples of metal roof materials, using similar colors as proposed for the composition shingle alternative. 3.Revised site lighting plan. V�'�r l- fixtures for the parking lot lighting to 250 watts or less, unless there is satisfactory 6,4 provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. Regardless of wattage, restrict the distribution of exterior lighting to 0 -5 lumens at the property line. To ensure compatibility with the surrounding residences, reduce the wattage of B. For safety and security, provide nighttime illumination of walkways and southern parking areas. REC1VED AUG 1 81994 CU►vuv►uIN% i Y DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No 9(,J Epic File No 1. ` / " 00 7D Fee $325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascade View Elementary School 2. Name of applicant: South Central School District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Krstine Whisler 4640 South 144 th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Contact: Nancy Kaynor Bassetti Architects 1011 Western Avenue #701 Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1994 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposcd timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned to start in April 1995. The moderization and new addition of the school is scheduled for use in the fall of 1996 The construction will be phased. New construction to be completed first, than modernization. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is unknown at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Topographical Survey by Penhallegon Associates, Consulting Engineers, May 25, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Determination Conditional Use Permit(CUP) approval Design Review Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. wp005.ses/amd 3 print date. August 17, 1994 • The project is a moderizittion and addition to an existing elementary school. The completed project will meet the current and projected program needs for 400 kindergarten through fifth grade students. The project includes: Lot area: 8.93 acres Building coverage: 29,689 S.F. existing 2Z782 S.F. proposed 5Z471 S.F. total New car and bus driveways Increased parking areas Repair to existing grass athletic fields Playgrounds Landscaping and irrigation 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project., including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of arca, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descriptio, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address : Parcel 734660 -0024. The site is locates at 13601 32nd Ave.S., Tukwila, WA. Exhibit A is a vicinity map showing the site. The legal description is exhibit B. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The area of expansion is rolling in terrain. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of' agricultural soils, specify them and note any primc farmland. The soil is characterized as three subsurface units. 1.) Fill - about 2' thick, highly moisture sensitive and low strength d' moderate compressibility. 2.) Weathered Till - 2'-4' of loose to medium dense silty sand er stiff sandy silt. 3.) Till- dense to very dense silty fine to coarse grained sand w/ some gravelly fine to coarse grained sand w /some cobbles. wp005.scs/amd 4 print date: August 17, 1994 f d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no history of unstable soils on the site. c. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. g. There will be grading necessary fir the new addition and paved areas. It is estimated that there will be 7,110 c.y. of cut and 55 c.y. of fill need for this project. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Short term increase in potential for on site erosion is always possible during site preparation & development activity. Yes, erosion could occur especially in regraded area west of the new building addition. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing impervious area is approximately 83,292 SF (1.91 acres) acres. The new addition and paved parking areas will have 58,119 SF (1.33 acres) acres of impervious surface. The impervious area for the total site is 141,411 SF (3.25 acres), or 36.4%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Prior to site work a grading permit shall have been obtained for any on -site grading which is not exempted by section 7003 UBC. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESCP) shall have been submitted and approved. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? .If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short term emissions and odors would be from construction equipment and site preparation. These impacts would be minimal: There will be no significant long -term impacts. The main generator of emissions is from vehicles coming to, and from the school. Automobile emissions consists mainly of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. There will be a minimal increase in traffic to the site. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The main off site sources of emissions are from automobiles travelling along the adjacent roadways. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils and washing truck wheels before they leave the site. wp005.scs/amd 5 print date: August 17. 1999 • 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the arca of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: wp005.scs/amd 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, thc number of houses to be served (if applicable), or thc number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. 6 print dare: August 17, 1994 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the sourcc of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The rate and volume of storm water runoff will increase for those previously undeveloped areas. The runoff will be directed to existing drainage and improved facilities. The storm drainage detention volume will be 309 LF ..5' pipe (± 6,000 cu. ft.) 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There could be oils, grease and other pollutants from the additional paved areas that could enter the ground through runoff d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control surface runoff during construction and after development (as required by the city). The existing storm drainage system will be modified to accept the new drainage system. No open space ponding is proposed and all detention will be contained in underground pipe or vault systems. Run off is collected in storm drain system piped to a detention pipe. Once water leaves detention system it enters a 130' bio- filtration swale, then goes off -site into a side road ditch system. Construction impacts could be minimized by the following: - schedule construction during the drier months of the year. -provide temporary cover for any exposed areas: and -keep runoff velocities low. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other - x shrubs - grass pasture crop or grain .wet soil plants: cattail, buttcrcup, bulrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other type of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing trees will be removed for new building and driveway constructton. Some existing dying Madrona trees will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. wp005.sca/amd 7 print date. August 17, 1994 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There will be additional landscaping provided along the perimeter of the site and new paved areas. The existing areas near the buildings will be enhanced and upgraded with a comprehensive landscape plan. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. squirrels, small rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Due to the existence of the school, there is no quality wildlife habitat on the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether is will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. All sources of energy are available to the site. b. Would your projcct affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The requirements of the Uniform Building Code will be satisfied in the construction of the new additions and substantial remodels. Energy conservative materials are encourage in all new construction. An Energy Conservation Report has been prepared by Hargis Engineers comparing HVAC Systems with respect to thier life cycle costs. wp005.scs /amd 8 print date: August 17, 1994 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This project will not generate any environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tukwilla Fire Department and Police Department respond to emergency situations. The South Central School District implements.a safety and emergency program for students and staff. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are no known health hazards that would occur as a result of further site development. Any pesticides used in the maintenance of the school grounds will be properly handled by qualified personnel. b. Noise wp005.scs/amd 1) What types of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main noise source in the immediate area is from traffic along adjacent streets and surrounding land uses. Significant noise is generated by aircraft to and from SeaTac Airport. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, ocher)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. . Short -term noise impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Site noise would be generated on average with in the hours of 7 ::30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. At 200 feet from construction, Leq would be approximately as follows: Activity Leq (in decibels) Clearing 71 -71 Excavation 59 -77 Foundations 65 Building Erection 60 -72 Finishing 62 -77 Long term noise impacts will be those associated with the use of the site for additional classroom space. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The following mitigation measures would reduce the construction impact: 1. Construction equipment : hould be equipped with muffler devices 2. Locate noisy operations away from noise sensitive areas when possible. 9 print date: August 17. 1994 3. Shut -off of idling equipment. 4. Schedule noisiest operations for the middle of the day. done during daytime hours 5. Schedule noisy operations so they are not concurrent. On -going noise impacts fromaircraft will be mitigated in construction systems abd acoustical materials. Building construction will be the buildings through 8. Land and Shoreline Usc a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is used for a school with residential uses surrounding the site. b. Has thc site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the sire. Cascade View Elementary currently exists on the site. The facility consist of 4 school buildings, a covered play area and two portable buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? There are no plans to demolish any of the existing permanent buildings. The portables will be removed from the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R -1 -Z2 Single Family Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? "Low Density Residential" If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in thc completed project? The renovated school will accommodate 400 students. The staff will remain at 45 full time and 10 part time people. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There will be no displacement. The existing students and staff will remain at this school. g. 1• wp005.scs/amd 10 print date: August 17, 1994 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The new classroom space is needed to meet the current enrollment for the district. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A. school facility is allowed as a conditional use in the R Zone. Conditional use requires special review to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with uses allowed in the same zone. The new school will allow additional classrooms to house the existing and projected enrollment for Cascade View Elementary School. This will be a state -of -the -art school which will allow the District to provide special programs that currently are unable to be housed in the existing school facility. The site can be adequately served by utilities. There are provisions fir adequate parking, access and circulation. There will be a minimal increase in traffic and noise as a result of the expansion. The new school will generally be compatible with the existing buildings in height and exterior appearance. There should be minimal impacts to the surrounding residential community. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicated whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None. c. Proposcd measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no housing impacts. School expansion is necessary to meet student population that exists in the school service boundary. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure will be the ridge line of the new gymnasium at 32' above the ground. The principal building materials will be brick and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views across the back of the site will be altered by the new addition. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will contain formal landscaping/ planting areas All landscaping will be planted prior to project completion unless authorized by the planning department. A detailed landscaping plan will be submitted with the building construction plans. wp005.scs/amd 11 print dare: August 17, 1994 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare that is produced from the site will be from building lighting and exterior lighting. Alro, light will be produced from vehicle headlights. This will be minimal due to the limited usage of the school during the nighttime hours. There will be security lighting during this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Main offsite sources of light and glare are from vehicles using adjacent streets and the surrounding land uses. d. Proposed measures to reduce of control light and glare impacts, if any: The new security and parking lighting will be properly screened from public right of ways and surrounding residential uses. Classroom usage is mainly during daytime hours with minimal building lighting during the evening hours. Any .additional lighting will be shielded as to not increase the ambient light level to an unacceptable level. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The existing school does provide a play ground and athletic fields on the site. There will be a new play ground and play structure as part of the school facility. The athletic fields will remain as existing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: School recreation opportunities are already provided on the site. There will be additional recreational facilities provided. The community can use these facilities after school hours. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to, the site? If so, generally describe. No. wp005.sa /arnd 12 print dace: August 17, 1994 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None, there are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation office will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main access to the site is from 32nd Ave S The existing site access will remain. The closest highway is Pacific Highway S. (route 99). b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The school presently has 84 parking spaces. The completed project will have 90 total parking spaces for the school facility, 53 permanent; 11 drop -off, and 9 street. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private. Frontage improvements will be provided as required by City of Tukwila. c. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is not anticipated that there will be an increase in the volume of vehicular trips per day to the school. Ther are 45 trips per staff 60 trips per student drop -offs, and approximately 150 students are bused per day. The peak volumes occur at 9:00a.m. and 3:00 p.m. g. wp005.scs/amd Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking and a new fire lane. Separation of bus and car driveways will greatly enhance site access safety. 13 print dace: August 17, 1994 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, the number of staff' 6. students are not increasing. The area is presently served by the Tukwila Fire Department and Police Department. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The we offire alarms and safety equipment could aid in decreasing the number offire calls. Afro, proper internal circulation will assure adequate access and turn radii for emergency vehicles. Fire hydrant placement and fire flow requirements will be satisfied. A fire lane is to be provided throughout the site. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through proper extension of services. Extension of utilities is the District's responsibility. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing energy sources are supplied by the city of Tukwilla and Washington Natural. Gas. The telephone service will be provided by Water and sewer service will be provided to the site by the City of Tukwila. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature. /t/1 c1' ; c3,4s5crri ,1 -Pact sr Pt /c4iir Nancy Kaynor, $assetti Architects P.S., for the Applicant Date Submitted. Attgitcr 1$, 1494 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE wp005.scs/amd 14 print date: August 17. 1994 Casca(ue View Elementary school and Showalter Middle School Modernizations and Additions TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #406 King County 4640 S. 144th Street,m Tukwila, WA 98168 -4196 Ls /C y Prepared by Pearteet :. . Engineering, Civil and Transportation Consultants 2828 Colby Avenue, Suite 410, Everett, WA (206) 252 -7233 INTRODUCTION This report documents the existing and future parking demand for the Cascade View Elementary School and the Showalter Middle School. South Central School District proposes to remodel existing facilities, construct additions to the schools, and revise the parking and circulation. The information found in this report is in response to questions raised by City of Tukwila staff in reviewing the proposed actions. This report identifies the existing school facilities, hours of operation, special activities and other uses of the school. Travel characteristics of the teachers, administrators and students,. are also identified. A survey of the parking on the sites was conducted identifying parking supply and utilization while school was in session. A survey recording the number of cars parked on the street within 800 feet of the schools was also made when both of the schools were in session and when the schools were closed for the summer. A parking survey for an evening event was made at the Showalter Middle School. Trip increases were projected based on information supplied by the school district. Pedestrian and bicycle accident information was obtained from the City of Tukwila and reviewed to determine if increased travel and the proposed improvements would result in an increase of these types of accidents. Impacts on existing parking, travel patterns and safety were identified and mitigation measures recommended. CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXISTING FACILITIES Cascade View Elementary School is located at 13601 32nd Avenue South, Tukwila Washington (see Figure 1). Listed below are pertinent characteristics regarding Cascade View Elementary School. 1) Hours of Operation: 9:00 a.m. - 3:10 p.m. 9:00 a.m. - 11:40 a.m. Kindergarten 12:30 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. Kindergarten 2) Student enrollment as of June 1994: 394 3) A total of 36 staff members currently work at Cascade View. There are approximately 10 itinerant staff that share their services with other schools who are not on -site on a daily basis. South Central School District 1 Perteet Engineering, Inc. 4) Approximately 150 students bussed everyday Average 60 students dropped off daily Average 180 students walk Faculty drive their own vehicles Figure 2 shows the School District boundary and Figure 3 shows the walking area.for Cascade View students. Cascade View averages three to four nights per week usage of the gym from 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm with groups no larger than 15 -20. The upper fields are used five days per week for sports activities (for instance soccer or baseball), seven months out of the school year from 5:00 pm - 8:00 pm. Some weekend usage is included for special practices or tournaments. 90 percent of the parking during the day and early evening hours is located in the parking lot north of the school building. Limited parking is available in front of the school on 32nd Avenue South. For special all- school events, it was reported that parking extends throughout the neighborhood, .thus causing increased traffic on neighboring streets. Following is a summary of the off- street and on- street parking study taken during June, 1994. Cascade View Elementary School Parking Lot Off - street Parking On- street Parking Parked Cars Street Supply Parked Cars Date Time Available Marked Spaces Marked Spaces Unmarked Spaces 6/09/94 10:05 am 47 38 1, 6/21/94 9:55 am 47 2 0 On- street Parking Parked Cars * The 10:05 am times were taken on June 9, 1994 (school in session). ** The 9:55 am times were taken on June 21, 1994 (school closed). South Central School District 2 Perteet Engineering, Inc. Street Shoulder 32nd Ave. S. between (10:05 am)* - 0 (10:05 am) - 0' . S.135th St. & S. 137th St. (9:55 am) ** - 0 (9:55 am) - 0 S. 136th St. between 32nd (10:05 am) - 9 (10:05 am) - 0 Ave. S. & 34th Ave. S. (9:55 am) - 10 + 1 Mcycl (9:55 am) - 1 S. 137th St. between 32nd (10:05 am) - 9 (10:05 am) - 2 Ave. S. & 34th Ave. S. (9:55 am) - 8 (9:55 am) - 1 * The 10:05 am times were taken on June 9, 1994 (school in session). ** The 9:55 am times were taken on June 21, 1994 (school closed). South Central School District 2 Perteet Engineering, Inc. The off - street parking was 83 percent utilized during the day of the survey. Based on a comparison of school day /non - school day parkers, it appears there is no spill -over parking from the school onto the surrounding streets during normal school hours. PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is not anticipated that there will be any increase in students or staff as a result in the proposed revisions. The proposed program accommodates 400 students and 39 faculty facility. The project purpose is to solve overcrowded conditions and provide additional learning opportunities. ' The original Cascade View Elementary School was built as four buildings connected by covered walkways in 1957. Additions and modernization are planned to meet the current and projected program needs for 400 students; Kindergarten through Fifth Grade, plus Preschool. Two four -room portable buildings currently on.site are used as instructional space and will be removed. Their uses will be incorporated into the new school building. The 29,589 square feet existing school will be modernized, and the covered walkways replaced. The existing structure will receive seismic upgrades, new insulation, window and door replacements, and a new pitched roof. All spaces will receive new mechanical and electrical systems, new finishes and new equipment. Additions of 26,282 square feet are also planned for a total of 55,871 square feet. Most of the new construction will be located on the west side of the existing school, consisting of new Library, Preschool, Kindergarten and First Grade classrooms, and Music Room. A new Gymnasium will be built on the northeast corner adjacent to the existing Multi - purpose Room. The classroom addition has been configured with the existing buildings to enclose a large central outdoor courtyard, meant to focus the whole school toward a new "heart", and create a clear organization of the whole facility. Sitework includes a reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking, new fire lane, utility upgrades, storm drainage, landscaping and irrigation, and new playgrounds. The current small parking lot will be revised. The bus and car driveways will be separated in order to restore safety into the traffic flow.' Busses will travel a new one way loop at the present main entry to the school. The new car driveway will weave along the north side of the site to a turn- around near the new Library, thus defining a second entrance to the school. A new playground and play equipment area is planned for the middle of the site, and may include a covered play structure. The playground and portion of the grass athletic fields will be regraded and will utilize the excavated soil from the new building. See proposed site plan, Figure 4. South Central School District 3 Perteet Engineering, Inc. PROJECT IMPACTS It is not anticipated that the proposed modernization and additions will result in . any increase in traffic. The student and staff levels are to remain the same as present operations. Based on our parking study, the existing parking supply was 83 percent utilized during the normal school hours. The following table shows existing and proposed parking compared to City of Tukwila code requirements: Cascade Elementary School Existing Parking Proposed Parking Code Requirement Code Requirements Schools Public Assembly 47 57 0 59 80 The proposed parking should be adequate during the normal school hours. It is . expected that after school events, parking will spillover into the adjacent neighborhood. MITIGATION Frontage improvements as planned should be implemented to provide additional on street parking spaces. Concurrent school events such as musicals and sports should not occur together to minimize spillover parking. The school should encourage parents to carpool with other parents to reduce the volumes of vehicles at school events. SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL EXISTING FACILITIES Showalter Middle School is located at 4628 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington (see Figure 5). 1) Hours of operation 7:30 am - 2:30 pm 2) Student enrollment as of June 1994: 540 3) A total of 38 staff members currently work at Showalter Middle School, and 12 administrators for the district. 4) Approximately 150 students are bussed everyday Average 75 students dropped off daily Average 315 students walk Faculty drive their own vehicles South Central School District 4 Perteet Engineering, Inc. The School District boundary is the same as shown in Figure 2. Showalter Middle School offers after school sports five days a week from 2:30 to 4:15 pm; 45 to 50 students are usually in attendance. Parking is located on the east side of the school. Most of the parking during the day is located in the lot. Parking is prohibited on most of the adjacent streets. Following is a summary of our off /onstreet study and evening inventory, taken during,. June, 1994. The evening event was a dance for the eighth grade class. Showalter Middle School Parking Lot Parked Cars Supply Cars Parked D ate Time Available Marked Spaces Marked Spaces Unmarked Spaces Street Shoulder 6/09/94* 9:45 am 84 55 1 0 6/09/94 7:45 pm 84 33 1 0 6/21/94 ** 9:37 am 84 27 0 0 1 * School in session ** School closed The offstreet parking was 67 percent utilized when school was in session and 32 percent utilized during the eighth grade class dance. Only 32 percent of the spaces were filled when school was closed for the summer. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Student and staff increases are shown in the table below: Showalter Middle School Student and Staff Program Existing Students Future Capacity Existing Staff and Future Staff District Staff On- Site 540 720 50 59* * Includes 6 part -time staff South Central School District 5 Perteet Engineering, Inc. Showalter Middle School presently consists of four buildings connected by covered walkways. Additions and modernization are planned to create more usable spaces to meet the current and projected program needs for 720 students. Portable buildings currently on site house daycare and special services support space and will be removed or relocated. Using the same travel characteristics, the following table summarizes the increase in daily trips: Showalter Middle School Travel Characteristics Per Day EXistin efcu uture: ssenge: Dro 400 508 150 202 315 418 Demolition of 7223 square feet in the commons area will make way for an addition of 12,408 square feet of new construction on two floors for a total square footage of 90,864. The added space consists primarily of science labs, an art lab on the second floor and a learning resource center on the first floor. New construction will also include covered walkways and covered play shed. All the existing buildings, (85,679 SF) will be modernized to different extents. In Building A, a 1938 and 1945 classroom building, the entire interior will be demolished leaving floor and roof structure only, and requiring complete new walls, mechanical and electrical systems, finishes and equipment. Minimal alterations are proposed for Building B, the music, technology, and home economics building built in 1969. Work there entails some new partitions and some new floor and wall finishes. Reconfiguration of the main gymnasium, Building C, and the locker rooms and bathrooms in the auxiliary gym, Building D (both built in 1963) require new partitions, plumbing, and. finishes. Planned sitework involves reconfiguration of the existing driveways, parking and fire lane, utility upgrades, and landscaping and irrigation. Bus and car driveways will be revised to focus traffic toward the two main entrances to the building. Cars will be routed in a new driveway from the street to the planned formal entry, which will be restored to the historic main entrance of the old building. The current bus loading area will be abandoned for lawn and landscaping, and the bus drive will be relocated to the west side of the school, connecting bus loading with the new west plaza and new back or student entrance, to the building (see Figure 6). South Central School District 6 Perteet Engineering, Inc. PROJECT IMPACTS The following table shows existing /proposed parking and the City of Tukwila code requirements. Showalter Middle School Existing Parking Proposed Parking Code Requirements: Code Requirements: School Public Assembly 84 115 71 230 The proposed modernization and additions will result in a small increase in traffic which is not expected to be significant. Based on our parking study, the existing parking supply was 65 percent utilized during the normal school hours. 'The proposed parking should be adequate during the normal school hours. It is expected that events taking place after school may result in parking spilling over into the adjacent neighborhood. MITIGATION Events should be scheduled so as not to occur concurrently. This will reduce the amount of spillover traffic and parking on adjacent neighborhood streets. Programs to encourage parents to carpool together with other families should also be implemented to reduce the number of vehicles at after school functions. Opportunities to use parking facilities at the high school or nearby lots should be arranged and recommended. ACCIDENTS Pedestrian and bicycle accident information for the South Central School District was obtained from the City of Tukwila. There were 27 pedestrian/bicycle accidents for the time period from January 1, 1991 through June 20, 1994 (approximately 3 -1/2 years). See Figure 7. Most of the accidents occurred along Pacific Highway South. It has been recommended that the school district work with the City and the State to encourage pedestrian and bicycle improvements along streets serving the schools. South Central School District 7 Perteet Engineering, Inc.