The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L94-0073 - SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL - ADDITIONS SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTL94 -0073 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL (WITHDRAWN) SEPA .. ,...+,., .. �..«., HEERY November 23, 1994 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Regarding: Dear Jack: Jack Pace SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School We have reviewed your November 9, 1994 letter regarding SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School. We concur with the comments stated in this letter and will proceed with design using your information as parameters. It should be noted that subject to the receipt of additional information from the City, we will be extending curb, gutter and sidewalks for Cascade View along 32nd Avenue South between 135th Street and 137th Street, not 136th Street as noted in your letter. We appreicate your review and comments and will see that these elements are incorporated in the design. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, HEER NTERNATIO , INC Gary Program Ma er cc: Klrstine VVhisler, SCSD Nancy Kaynor, BA Mike Finnegan, HI SCSD - CV - a(H), DD SCSD - SMS - a(H), DD g:\ user\ public \projs\scsd\cons \0079.;Itr N',2d1994 Heery International, Inc. A group of professional service practices 10900 NE 4th Street, Suite 1110, Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone 206. 4544703 Fax 206.4544726 ATLANTA BALTIMORE BOSTON CHARLOTTE CLEVELAND DENVER HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MEXICO CITY MIAMI NEW YORK ORLANDO PHILADELPHIA PORTLAND SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SPOKANE VANCOUVER WASHINGTON DC .1. Architecture Construction Management Engineering Graphic Design Interior Design Program Management Strategic Facilities Planning City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director November 3, 1994 Dr. Michael Silver, Superintendent South Central School District 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 FAX 244 -8602 RE: Cascade View Elementary School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Showalter Middle School SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Dear Mr. Silver, The City has reviewed the environmental checklists and determinations noted above and has the following comments on the proposals. Cascade View Elementary SEPA DNS Prior to issuance of any permits and inconjunction with the conditional use'permit, the following items will be required: 1. Storm water Drainage Permit. The applicant must describe the volume of storm water discharge, capacity of detention and provide oil /water separators where deemed necessary. 2. Utility and Street Use Permit. 3. The applicant will be required to reimburse the City for the construction cost of public street frontal improvements, including curb, gutter and Sidewalk, along 32nd Avenue between 135th St. and approximately 136-th St. t a, / 4. Automatic fire sprinklers will be required by the Fire Department. 5. Additional fire hydrants will need to be installed at locations approved by the Fire Department. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax-1206) 431 -3665 Showalter Middle School Prior to issuance of any permits, the City will require the following: 1. Any increase in storm water .runoff will require retention /detention in compliance with the King County Storm water Management Manual. The utility plans need to indicate where and how the on -site stormwater collection system will be connected to the public storm water system located in Macadam Road S. 2. Additional fire hydrants will be required. 3. •Fire alarm_ and sprinkler systems are required to be installed. 4. Fire lanes are required to support 70,000 pounds. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these proposals. Sincerely, Libby k'udson Associate Planner October 24, 1994 Gary Goltz Herry International, Inc. 10900 NE 4th Street, Suite 1110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: SEPA Determinations for Showalter Middle School and Cascade View Elementary School. I appreciate you forwarding the SEPA determinations for the schools which the City had not previously received. We received the two Determinations of Nonsignificance's on October 19, 1994. As discussed on the phone today, the School District, as lead agency, has extended the comment period to November 2, 1994. Because the City is not the lead agency but rather an agency of jurisdiction, the City is required to be notified by the lead agency upon SEPA determination. I will forward the SEPA comments as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Libby Hudson Associate Planner C: South Central School District Bob Betts CP) South eentiral K I NOGL COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET . • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 -4196 • Phone: 244 -2101 WAC 197 -11 -970 Determination of nonsignficiance (DNS). DETERMINATION; OF NONSIGNIFICANCE: Description of proposal: Proponent: Location of proposal, including street address: Renovation and addition to Showalter: South Central School District No. 406 4628 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Lead agency: South Central School District ddle`S.choal ; The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2.1C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act orl• this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be su!imitted by October 17, 1994. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: POSITION / TITLE: ADDRESS: Date: disk 41 \dots \shwaltcr.dns Dr. Michael Silver Superintendent 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Signature: PERET ENGINEERING-- INC. Civil and Transportation Consultants 2828 Colby Avenue, Suite 410 Everett, WA 98201 September 28, 1994 Mr. Ron Cameron, P.E. City Engineer City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr. Vernon Umetsu Associate Planner Department of Community Development Planning 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 252 -7233 FAX: 339 -6018 RECEIVED SEP29 DEVELOPMENT RE: Cascade View Elementary and Showalter Middle School Traffic Impact Study Dear Ron and Vernon: I received a call from Ralph Rohwer with Heery International Inc. who is working for the South Central School District on the remodel and additions to the above referenced schools. He informed me that the staff from Tukwila Planning has stated in their review of the traffic impact analysis that they have found the study to be incomplete. I have reviewed my notes in our project file and found that, based on phone conversations with you, existing and future parking demands during the day and the evening were of major concern. Traffic flows were not identified as a potential problem. Therefore, the study focused on existing parking and future parking increases which could result from the proposed projects. Parking surveys were made, future trip increases identified, and parking impacts identified based on input from the School District and our limited survey of on and off street parking at these two locations. Showalter Middle School was estimated to have 108 additional vehicular staff trips and Cascade View Elementary School did not anticipate any increase in staff or student trips. Traffic level -of- service analyses were not made. School trips do not coincide with peak trips. The reports were then submitted to the City. Page 2 South Central School District Letter September 28, 1994 Please let me know if I misinterpreted our conversations or if you need additional information for the traffic study. I can be reached at 252 -7233. Sincerely, PERTEET ENGINEERING, INC. Donald H. Carr, P.E. Associate cc: Ralph Rohwer MEMO TO: Finance Department Attn: Richard Takechi FROM: Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner DATE: August 31, 1994 SUBJECT: Permit Fee Refund Please refund the South Central School District $650.00 for fees for two SEPA Checklists (@ $325 each: L94 -0070 and L94- 0073). Checklists were mistakenly provided to DCD, however, SEPA Determinations for school district projects are made by the school district acting as lead agency. Please notify me if you have any questions. The refund should be made out to: South Central School District Mail to: South Central School District Attention: Kirstine Whisler 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 Thank you. RECEIVED AM 8 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No �% Epic File No —C , -V' G3 Fee $325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Showalter Middle School 2. Name of applicant: South Central School District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Kirstine Whisler 4640 South 144th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Contact: Nancy Kaynor 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 701, Seattle, WA 98104 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1994 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned to start in April, 1995 The modernization and new addition of the school is scheduled for use in the fall of 1996 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is unknown at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Boundary and Topographic Survey, by Hammond Collier and Wade- Livingstone, May 20, 1994 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Determination Conditional use Permit(CUP) approval Design Review Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit (L I) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. wp006.scs/amd 3 Print Date: August 17, 1994 The project is a modernization and additions to an existing middle school to create more usable spaces to meet the current and projected program needs for 720 middle school students. Existing portable buildings will be removed or relocated. The project includes: Lot area: Developed portion, this proposal: Building coverage: 14 acres 6 acres 85,679 S.F. existing 1 5,111 S.F. proposed 100,790 S.F. total New covered walkways and plaza Revised car and bus driveways Increased parking area Landscape and irrigation 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project., including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descriptio, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site address : The site is located at 4628 S. 144th St., Tukwila, WA. Exhibit A is a vicinity map showing the site. The legal description is exhibit B. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The area of the addition is flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 80% at undeveloped portion; 50% at developed portion. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil is characterized as three subsurface units. 1.) Fill - about 2' thick, highly moisture sensitive and low strength c moderate compressibility. 2.) Weathered Till - 2 =4' of loose to medium dense silty sand cr stiff sandy silt. 3.) Till - dense to very dense silty fine to coarse grained sand w/ some gravelly fine to coarse grained sand w/ some cobbles. wp006.scs/amd 4 Prins Date: August 17, 1994 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no history of unstable soils on the site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be some grading necessary fir the new paved areas. It is estimated that there will be 1,280 c.y. of cut and 50 c.y. of fill need for this project. The area of the new addition is already developed with building and asphalt. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Short term increase in potential for on site erosion is always possible during site preparation & development activity. Yes, minimal erosion could occur in the area of the new building addition. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The existing impervious area is approximately 192,290 SF (4.42 acres). The proposed addition and paved parking areas will have 181,283 SF (4.16 acres) of impervious - surface. The impervious area for the total site will be less than that existing by .23 acres. The impervious area for the total site is 29.7%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Prior to site work a grading permit shall have been obtained fir any on -site grading which is not exempted by section 7003 UBC. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESCP) shall have been submitted and approved. g. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Short term emissions and odors would be from construction equipment and site preparation. These impacts would be minimal. There will be no significant long -term impacts. The main generator of emissions is from vehicles coming to and from the school Automobile emissions consists mainly of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons and photochemical oxidants. There will be a minimal increase in traffic to the site. b. Are there any of site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The main off site sources of emissions are from automobiles travelling along the adjacent roadways. wpOO6.scs/amd 5 Print Date. August 17, 1994 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The Washington Clean Air Act requires the use of all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air pollution including dust. Construction impacts will not be significant and can be controlled by watering or using dust suppressants on areas of exposed soils and washing truck wheels before they leave the site. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. wp006.scs/arnd 6 Prins Date: August 17, 1994 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The rate and volume of storm water runoff will not increase for this site. Net impervious surface will be reduced. The runoff will be directed to existing drainage and improved facilities. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There could be oils, grease and other pollutants from the new paved areas that could enter the ground through runoff' d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary and permanent drainage facilities will be used to control surface runoff during construction and after development (as required by the county). The existing storm drainage system will be modified to accept the new drainage system. No open space ponding is proposed and all detention will be contained in the existing 36" detention pipe. No additional detention is required because of no additional net impervious surfaces.. Construction impacts could be minimized by the following: - schedule construction during the drier months of the year. -provide temporary cover for any exposed areas: and -keep runoff velocities low. -place filter fabric over catch basins 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _x_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other type of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There will be minimal vegetation removes or altered on the site. wp006.scs/amd 7 Print Date: August 17, 1994 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There will be additional landscaping provided along the perimeter of the site and new paved areas. The existing areas near the buildings will be enhanced and upgraded with a comprehensive landscape plan. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels, small rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No rare or endangered species are known to exist on the property. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Due to the existence of the school, there is no quality wildlife habitat on the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. All sources of energy are available to the site. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. wp006.scs/amd 8 Print Date. August 17, 1994 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to,reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The requirements of the Uniform Building Code will be satisfied in the construction of the new additions and substantial remodels. Energy conservative materials are encourage in all new construction. An Energy Conservation Report has been prepared by Hargis Engineers comparing HVAC Systems fir their life cycle costs. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This project will not generate any environmental health hazards. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tukwila Fire Department and Police Department respond to emergency situations. The South Central School District implements a safety and emergency program for students and staff 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are no known health hazards that would occur as a result of further site development. Any pesticides used in the maintenance of the school grounds will be properly handled by qualified personnel. b. Noise wp006.scs/amd 1) What types of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main noise source in the area is from traffic along adjacent streets and surrounding land uses, and school bus traffic on -site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short -term noise impacts will result from the use of construction equipment during site development. Site noise would be enerated an average with in the hours of 7.•30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. At 200 feet frrom construction, Leq would be approximately as follows: flctivity Leq (in decibels) Clearing 71 -71 Excavation 59 -77 Foundations 65 Building Erection 60 -72 Finishing 62 -77 Long term noise impacts will be those associated with the we of the site for additional classroom space. 9 Print Date: August 17. 1994 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The following mitigation measures would reduce the construction impact: 1. Construction equipment should be equipped with muffler devices 2 Locate noisy operations away from noise sensitive areas when possible. 3. Shut -off of idling equipment. 4. Schedule noisiest operations for the middle of the day. Building construction will be done during daytime hours S. Schedule noisy operations so they are not concurrent. There are no significant long -term noise impacts anticipated. School bus traffic is being relocated in the proposal away from classrooms, thereby reducing on -site bus traffic noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is used fir a school with residential uses surrounding the site. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Showalter Middle School currently exists on the site. The facility consist of 4 school buildings and portable classroom buildings. The South central School District's office building and one portable serving as office space also are on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The existing cafeteria wing will be demolished. The classroom portables will be removed from the site. The office portable will be relocated closer to the existing South Central School District's building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned R -1 -72 Single Family Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? "Public Facilities" g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. wp006.scs/amd 10 Print Date: August 17. 1994 J. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The renovated school will accommodate 720 students, 180 beyond what are currently housed at the existing buildings. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There will be no displacement. The existing students and staff will remain at this school. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if. any: The new classroom space is needed to meet the current and projected enrollment for the district. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A school facility is allowed as a conditional use in the R Zone. Conditional use requires special review to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with uses allowed in the same .zone. The new school will allow additional classrooms to house the existing and projected enrollment for Cascade View Elementary School. This will be a state -of -the -art school which will allow the District to provide special programs that currently are unable to be housed in the existing school facility. The site can be adequately served by utilities. There are provisions for adequate parking, access and circulation. There will be a minimal increase in traffic and noise as a result of the expansion. The new school will generally be compatible with the existing buildings in height and exterior appearance. There should be minimal impacts to the surrounding residential community. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no housing impacts. School expansion is necessary to meet student population that exists in the school service boundary. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure will be the ridge line of the new gable roof maximum height at north end approximately at 7' above the 32' high existing parapet. The height of the new additions will all be below the existing roof line. The principal building materials will stucco applied over the existing concrete walls or new construction. wp006.scs /amd 11 Print Date: August 17, 1994 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will contain formal landscaping/ planting areas. All landscaping will be planted prior to project completion unless authorized by the planning department. A detailed landscaping plan will be submitted with the building construction plans. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare that is produced from the site will be from building lighting and exterior lighting. Also, light will be produced from vehicle headlights. This will be minimal due to the limited usage of the school during the nighttime hours There will be security lighting during this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Main off-site sources of light and glare are from vehicles using adjacent streets and the surrounding land uses. d. Proposed measures to reduce of control light and glare impacts, if any: The new security and parking lighting will be properly screened from public right of ways and surrounding residential uses. Classroom usage is mainly during daytime hours with minimal building lighting during the evening hours. Any additional lighting will be shielded as to not increase the ambient light level to an unacceptable level. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The existing school does provide athletic fields on the site. There will be a new outdoor covered play structure and central courtyard as part of the school facility. Access to the athletic fields will be improved. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: School recreation opportunities are already provided on the site. There will be additional recreational facilities provided. The community can use these facilities after school hours. wp006.scs/amd 12 Print Date. August 17, 1994 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None, there are no known impacts. If an archeological site is found during the course of construction, the State Historic Preservation office will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main access to the site is from S. 144th St., a two lane road. Both existing site accesses will be abandoned. Two new driveways are proposed, one for cars and one fir buses. The closest highway is 1-5. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Transit stops occur along South 144th. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The school presently has 84 parking spaces. The completed project will have 177 total parking spaces for the school facility, 120 permanent and 25 event plus 32 event spaces on grass. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private. No new frontage improvements are planned. Crosswalks will be relocated to improve pedestrian safety. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. wp006.scs/amd 13 Print Date. August 17. 1994 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by Perteet Engineering for the South Central School District in June of 1994. It is anticipated that there will be a increase of 16 vehicular trips per day to the school. There will be 54 trips per staff 108 trips per student drop -offs and 173 students bussed in.. The peak volumes occur at 7:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Reconfiguration of the existing driveway, additional driveways and parking and a new fire lane. Separation of bus and car driveways will greatly enhance site access and safety. g. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe The area is presently served by the Tukwila Fire Department and Police Department. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The use of fire alarms and safety equipment could aid in decreasing the number of fire calls. Also, proper internal circulation will assure adequate access and turn radii for emergency vehicles. Fire hydrant placement and fire flow requirements will be satisfied. A fire lane is to be provided throughout the site. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through proper extension of services. Extension of utilities is the District's responsibility. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing energy sources are supplied by the city of Tukwila and Washington Natural Gas. The telephone service will be provided by Water and sewer service will be provided to the site by the City of Tukwila. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. /(M -?jf asset, 3A- S5e-ri 4A. i i6 ..(2-ell.-Kw API Li64 Nancy Kaynor, ti Architects P.S., for the Applicant Signature. Date Submitted. fq get PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE wp006.scs/amd 14 Print Date: August 17, 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EXHIBIT A SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL SOUth eentra l SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 Phone: 244.21U0 SCALE IN STATUTE MILE Yt[ V2 111 0 COPYRIGHT KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EXHIBIT B SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE WEST 108 FEET OF THE NORTH 280.5 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE EAST 80 FEET OF THE WEST 188 FEET OF THE NORTH 280.5 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL C THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE NORTH 280.5 FEET OF THE EAST 220.7 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL D BEGINNING AT A POINT 280 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 249.8 FEET; THENCE EAST 961.6 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK ROAD NO. 2 AS CONVEYED BY CHARLES FOSTER TO KING COUNTY BY DEED DATED JULY . 24, 1903; THENCE NORTH 36' 42' WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD 255.6 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10' 18' WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF ROAD 45.5 FEET; THENCE WEST 802.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL F BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 1' 18'15" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 786.7 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89' 17'30" EAST 500 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1' 18'15" EAST 156.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 17'30" WEST 500 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1' 18'15" WEST 156.86 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL G THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 190 FEET OF THE EAST 565 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET DEEDED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1158646; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 472349 AND 5548565; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF THE WEST 30 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND WEST OF THE SOUTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE EAST LINE OF VIEW STREET "43RD AVENUE SOUTH" AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF RIVERTON MACADAM ROAD TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DEEDED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6010970; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 3 FEET OF THE SOUTH 23 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, FROM ENGR. STA. 88 +80 TO ENGR. STA. 90 +00 AS SURVEYED BY KING COUNTY SURVEY NO. 20- 23 -4 -46, DEEDED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7408130313; ALSO THE WEST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 609.84 FEET OF THE SOUTH 629.84 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL H: THE WEST 190 FEET OF THE EAST 565 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET DEEDED TO KING COUNTY FOR SOUTH 144TH STREET UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1158646. PARCEL I: THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 500 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 280 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION ON THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 249.8 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LINE; THENCE EAST 961.6 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK ROAD NO. 2 AS CONVEYED BY CHARLES FOSTER TO KING COUNTY BY DEED DATED JULY 24, 1903 AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; AND LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION NORTH 786.70 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LINE; THENCE NORTH 89' 17'30" EAST 500 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. E E 82 0 co jJ 0 ;A> >t> >1>>1> 111111 ii \-----.,,, --",'."':"4: ■ .5:',7 1- 1 . ,,ssi 1 4 -1--.e . / " '-i. ic)., Ir. --,i;••4 F,.; 1 i 7.- -- - -.,.-- . • - .0 I I' .- °-"' "4 '' ' ' '..f.',? III 4 ( '1 I ' 1'i 1 1 ‘ • ■- , ,:," - ' .- R 7- ,: . '" - .1 1 " ;'" -t- ' k „ 7 I 1 1. ' - - 1 1c,, 'I. .1 ,..3•• . :. 1---.11::;,... i'... rI l(!j'a :1 ” Cr\i Y Lti-- !--------J. -14' 'r i: ,i 11':', '''' ._j !_j",1x1 .1! ' :' ' • • 1 , ,---;----,,-1--4----• ---;•- '\ 11j ., ... ....,_ .. , ,_,.... ■ . r. ----1.-•-•-k ::21,• 1-1,0 ,,A ,. • .1;.,.. ,,';', L.@ ,... „ ... „..., :\ -,,, ,..l■ ..,..., A.) .1, if 9, 0 Z 6'1 tn 0 • 4. - (-) 6 > o r 0 o z o > • 0 m C) c • ," r o Z 0 0 • P1 1 s I • 4- / ..1 li / .1c,..., - :• :., „ ,..,„....._ • ▪ ---_. ..... . ,.. \ i:S 7,71;,\•..\.c...4 :":1..--- ;;Y Z.'' 7)—r,----..) 1- ..p.•%,1 I! / , j,1:1• .111) .,,? .,_ ,1.: r. Crv'— 1-_,Ii 1:'-',--- ,,_.,. i,F-::( t ; I% -1/Z • ( 1;1 . , , A i:.: -/ 1_, . _...._---\ si - j ,,,,,,o ----,4 N,.- .........c.,.1.?. , , .) ■ • ' " -.=..,_.......,),, p.------------ r-r ,',......r.:.-K).___:_._:,._.:....-........________...,..,,,,_._— li7' '''-i° ,..:i., ,, , .......... • i , ,__ .._„._, •i ____-_JkL-- :__--,., ,.. (---,1------- _,,,,----" 5. -./ ‘'''•9?„'•1 0VZ6‘6",,r1c.x.,128/!. :4,,y • • • ; , -•47; F. 5 5, E' ;' y's, 7 2 ;IA0 ° `4 c 41 4 6 9 zz 14' • > 3 3 z 0 (.4 r c■ 0 „, — 2 0 7i in m > • 0 6 2 r 1 onl c. • z 0 w — 1 0 z •1,•,,,,, ri / .s ■ ii"i7.:':#1411.::t1,0ex•O ; " • i"; • u e:ya Y, t • .1,7•8 .4»»' MI•1>-7/Z.- -7 r-- ; . f - ---- • ' . . s • • • 3RWit 15:99 I § 0- ill 9:472 Li il; 1A41:0 2I 1 e1411l 11. 1 1414ft4 t Mf!i f4 i filiI b eIfiII g 1111A 1111p 1St, n �DD k' 1112 <d X12 znn 1 f>>>>>>>>>1> fiq n n @f� r a Y191 � n�� etld y r-- c r , 1 / . f .1 ' ,,: : ■ t . ' I \ \ .1)) 00 • 00 40 0 0 I -r- - 12.:a (14 •%aPt. 1 f 1E11 I I I Ll 04) 0 ) co>, ~ V ) " ,t1inJ 1 \\=,--- 127 A. 4 19,) \ 1 10 1 .4 I n-) r ; 6 J. a L. 7 11 fi A 0400(0•010ayi 5. "7.i 5 5 5 ..... . 1 I 1 1 7 c&C)0 (DO c'Of g 1 7 7 t t 31nQ3'+3s 1W d k,,k‘ „tz la I./ >DDDDDDDD .; •2 iag :0,4" 'Tilq Azif4 !ti 4 tizg § § gg 1:1013% 1:4/1 orp JAR '4,1 V 9078 - NOIIVA31S 1SV? 7VI1?JVd A —1- >r,›1›r›r,»[>> • A ,1 114[1 I I III Nil NE 1111•111111111 MIME '01 111 111 111 111 111 III III III HI III 11111 III 311 111 III III • • 111 1 III 1 111 IIII III 1111 111 111 111 111 III 111 • • III III III 111 • 111 111 111 111 111 111 M • 111 1 III III III III III 111 111 III III III III 1•11 NMI ° • 4't ;f1 Er 1 .111A 1111 htt 0 5019 - NOI1VA213 1SPPA Q k. ' cn 0 1) , :S7 I 1 I ;4 61 i6 q gi !I ii ,.imsmiks. it li ' I 7_ ot d'' •"::::- ,--+ „1„ty O PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION - BLDG A K-= 1 11 ® PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION - BLDGS A E B Omni IlIuuU is46 r-A>t>r,-,>[>> >>I> t 01,1 irg Nil OR fJU =hi 11114-1,1 .1 e is a -1 V 0 V ill V gtp 11 gi fop