HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L93-0028 - SGA CORPORATION - GATEWAY BUILDING #8 DESIGN REVIEWl93-0028
gateway north #8
.
JUN 02 '93 07:00 D KEHLE)•CHITECT
•
architect
June 2, 1993
City. of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
• .ATTN: Vernon & Bob Betts
RE: E.B. Bradley
Per your request, the following
this project:
. 1) Rezone
P.2/2 •
• •
••: ••%
03
DEVLLiT
•
R
•
2 10
-
L1:;;Jit
King County file numbers apply to
- Ordinance #8592 - July 11, 1988
2) Shoreline - 075-87-SH
3) priavious MDNS
- July 19, 1988
- March 15, 1988
If ,you have any further questions, please call.
Since ely
David Kehle
DK/ct
cc: Phil Wood
Bob Hart
(206)433-8997 0 12878 INTERURBAN AVENUE MUM
o SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98168
typical reveal section
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON
98118
architect
FRACTURED LOOK DESIGNS
rvWVWvw
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
116TH STREET
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
BIA.R.
APPROVED w
DATE VA6......INITIALS.Af-t r I U
^)
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
May 28, 1993
Mr. David Kehle
12878 Interurban Avenue S.
Seattle, WA 98168
RE: L93 -0028: Gateway Building No. 8.
Dear Mr. Kehle,
This is to confirm that the Board of Architectural Review has
completed its consideration of the subject application. A
summary of their actions is shown below:
1. One panel of glazing in the middle of the west elevation, as
shown on the BAR approved drawings, shall be replaced with a
dark painted concrete strip to accommodate the applicant's
need for additional structural support,
2. The findings and conclusions in the staff report of May 27,
1993, are otherwise adopted,
3. The project is approved subject to the following conditions:
a. Signs for the building shall be approved as to general
size, location, colors and scale, such that the
applicant can obtain a specific permit by subsequent
administrative approval within these guidelines, and
b. Administrative review of the lighting in the proposed
four parking space area for the trail head to assure
adequate safe illumination as discussed at the public
hearing.
Note: Options discussed by the applicant at the
hearing included moving the western light standard
further north and adding a second light to the
post. The need to allow no off -site glare was
recognized.
Please feel free to contact me at 431 -3684 if you have any
questions.
Sin er
Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Plan
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 11100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development
HEARING DATE:
PROJECT / NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
ZONING:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
STAFF:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF REPORT
to the
BOARD of ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Prepared May 20, 1993
May 27, 1993
L93 -0028: Gateway Building #8
Rick Beeler, Director
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
Construct a 42,155 square foot warehouse /office building for the
E.B. Bradley Company. This project contains approximately
4,000 square feet of office space, high and low -bay loading
facilities and 64 parking stalls. The proposal also includes a lot
line adjustment for 36 feet.
South 116th Street west of East Marginal Way, and south of the
Duwamish River.
Approximately 3.5 acres, after the 36 foot lot line adjustment
M -1 Light Industry
Light Industrial
L93 -0027 DNS Issued 13 May 1993
Robert S. Betts
A. Applicant's submittal
B. Applicant's Narrative
C. Perspective Drawing (to be submitted at hearing)
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
Staff Report to the L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 2
Board of Architectural Review
FINDINGS
BACKGROUND
The proposal's entire northern line abuts the Duwamish River. The first 40 feet is
designated as a river environment. As part of the original approvals for the overall
park, this area is already developed with a public trail. Views from here of parking
and loading areas will be screened by a combination of differences in grade, a
concrete wall along the high -dock loading area, and extensive landscaping along the
north property line.
Site improvements in the shoreline environment include landscaping and constructing
a set of access steps from the adjoining parking area. Since these improvements
exceed the threshold for exempt construction activities, Kemper Real Estate must
obtain a shoreline substantial development permit. Tukwila's Department of
Community Development administratively reviews and approves such Shoreline
applications, after Design Review has been completed. The State Department of
Ecology makes final reviews and approvals.
As part of this Shoreline review process, the City and the applicant will provide an
easement or similar assurance for the public's use of a minimum of six parking
spaces. This will be at a location mutually agreeable between the City and the
applicant. The location does not have to be on the E.B. Bradley site, but in a
suitable location to provide convenient access to the River Trail. It shall be subject
to reasonable hours of use such as evenings and weekends, and the agreement shall
provide suitable indemnification by the City.
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
Project description: This project is the seventh to be constructed in Gateway North
Corporate Park. Original plans, approvals and permits for the overall park were by
King County before this area was annexed to the City of Tukwila.
The building will be essentially a warehouse facility. Most activities will be on the
ground level. There will be two offices, one of which will be a 1,500 foot space on
a mezzanine level. The building structure will be approximately 27 feet in overall
height. It will be of the same colors and materials employed in the rest of the Park.
Site improvements include utilities, parking areas, landscaping, walkways and a wall
adjacent to the loading area.
Staff Report to the
Board of Architectural Review
•
L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 3
Site Description: The project abuts the Duwamish River. It has been rough - graded.
All utilities are installed to the property lines. South 116th Street provides access all
along the southerly margin of the property. This is a landscaped private road
easement, maintained by the developer. It intersects with East Marginal Way, which
provides primary access to the business park. The Duwamish River Trail abuts the
site on the north, and Kemper Real Estate proposes to provide a direct pedestrian
access to this trail.
Surrounding Land Uses: Existing Gateway structures are to the south and west. The
Duwamish River and Trail are to the north; A vacant lot, owned by the developer,
is to the east.
DECISION CRITERIA '
In reviewing any application, the Board of Architectural Review relies on the
following guidelines. The applicant's response and the staff's summary of relevant
facts follow.
The applicant provided a Narrative (Attachment B) which should be referred to in
conjunction with detailed responses to each review criterion.
1. Relationship of Structure to Site.
(A) The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streelscape and to
provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement;
(B) Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual
impact of large paved.areas;
(C) The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site.
Applicant's Response (See Narrative Attachment B):
"The building is sited to screen loading from river views and South 116th by placing
these to the east and future development. The front (South 116th) presents the
parking and landscaping to match the existing development frontage design. The
building must then be placed up to the river setback."
Staff Response:
The transition between South 116th street is already constructed. It consists of earth
berms, lawn, and street trees. A sidewalk is not planned, as pedestrian movement
will be, accommodated along the River Trail.
Parking and service areas are located on the street side of the building, rather than
•
Staff Report to the
Board of Architectural Review
L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 4
on the river side. These areas flank the structure, rather than concentrate on just
one side. They are generally screened by the extensive berms mentioned above.
The building's scale is compatible with that found elsewhere in the park, especially
when viewed from South 116th Street. The scale of the building along the River
Trail has been modified by extensive design work on the riverfront facade. These
modifications include techniques such as variations in color, adjustments in wall
locations, changes in surface texture, adjustments in silhouette, and a variety of
landscaping.
2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area
(A) Harmony in texture, lines and masses is encouraged.
(B) Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided;
(C) Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character,
(D) Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patients and loadingfacilities in terms of
safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged;
(E) Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
Applicant's Response (See Narrative. Attachment B):
'The building scale, materials and colors will be similar to the existing development
and the owner -user facility will be designed to complement and accent the existing
buildings. The facade design, recessed storefronts, concrete panel accent band is(are)
all designed to match the existing buildings. Landscaping is similar to existing and
will complement the existing. Circulation patterns are existing and the east curb cut
will be shared with the east development."
Staff's Response:
Kemper's design reflects that found in the existing Corporate Park. The landscape
transition is appropriate with the present River Trail environment, and is
accomplished with berms to screen views of parking, walls to screen the loading area,
and complementary landscape materials.
Considerable attention has been given to the high -dock loading area on the building's
east side. This design is intended to match similar loading bays on a future building,
which would be located on the now - vacant lot to the east. The present
driveway /access will be shared, reducing the amount of paving and minimizing
congestion and turning movements on South 116th Street.
If appropriate, the wall which separates the River Trail from this eastern loading area
will be extended at the time a future structure is built. The extension is intended to
provide continuity in design and in screening. It has another function as well. The
Staff Report to the
Board of Architectural Review
L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 5
wall at the loading area acts as a deterrent from mixing pedestrian with truck traffic.
The site design provides pedestrian access to the River Trail by a path and steps
along the building's west side.
Two entrances to the parking areas provide separation of truck and car traffic, with
most loading activities occurring on the east and south sides, but customer and
employee access on the west side.
3. Landscape and Site Treatment.
(A) Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
should be recognized, preserved and enhanced;
(B) Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide
an inviting and stable appearance;
(C) Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and
important axes, and provide shade.
(D) In locations where plants will be susceptible to • injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken;
(E) Where building sites limit planting; the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas in encouraged;
(F) Screening of service yards and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by
the use of walls, fencing; planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter
and summer;
(G) In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings
of wood, brick stone or gravel may be used;
(H) Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape.
Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and
adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and
brilliant colors should be avoided.
Applicant's Response (See Narrative Attachment B):
"The landscape design is in keeping with the surrounding Gateway North theme.
Usage of grass berms, trees and building berming are in keeping with the overall
park. The trail landscaping will be in keeping with the existing improvements and
will be adjusted as required to meet Parks Dept. requirements."
"Site lighting will be wall - mounted "shoe box" style fixtures to match existing (ones)."
"Dumpsters are screened via concrete walls and landscaping. The loading area is also
screened from the river via a concrete wall and landscaping."
Staff's Response:
Staff concurs with the applicant. Dumpsters and recycling areas meet city codes.
Screening is adequate. Lighting diagrams indicate a restraint in night -time lighting,
such that surrounding areas such as the River Trail will not be affected.
Staff Report to the L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 6
Board of Architectural Review
4. Building Design.
(A) Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design
and relationship to surroundings;
(B) Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring
developments;
(C) Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions
and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with
anticipated life of the structure;
(D) Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent;
(E) Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened
from view;
(F) Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed
accessories should be harmonious with building design;
(G) Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided, Variety of detail, form
and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
Applicant's Response (See Narrative Attachment B):
"Building modulation and facade accents, corner notched treatments, building glazing
and the expression of structure via the concrete colonade look, all accent the building
design and are in keeping with the existing park design."
Staff's Response:
This design matches themes in the rest of Gateway North Corporate Park. The one
exception is the building's north (riverfront) facade, which has been redesigned to
provide variety.
The new design for the north facade reduces the appearance of either monotony or
massiveness. Deliberate changes in the facade's middle section provide variety.
Walls are scored to create a change in texture, and they are offset several feet to
recede into the structure and to break up the appearance of mass. The structure's
silhouette now includes "stepping ", or deliberate jogs up- and -down. The eastern
screening wall along the loading bays is . also "stepped," and provides a visual
transition and linkage with the building.
The parapet screens views of rooftop mechanical equipment.
Signs are appropriate for the parapet. See 5., below.
S. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture
(A) Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural
concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be
appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should
Staff Report to the
Board of Architectural Review
(B)
'SF
L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 7
be to scale.
Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines
applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
Applicant's Response (See Narrative Attachment B):
"Picnic benches for employees and a stair access to the trail is being provided on site
for E. B. Bradley's use. This can also be used by other park employees but is
intended primarily for E. B. Bradley."
Staff's Response:
The picnic area and River Trail path are appropriately designed and located.
E.B. Bradley's signs are shown on the drawings, and will be located on the facade,
where they can be seen from South 116th Street. The signs' general characteristics
include individual letters, no lighting, at locations near the structure's parapet. Board
Approval of these features will allow subsequent administrative approval of specific
details when an actual sign permit is requested at a later date.
CONCLUSIONS
General Review Criteria: '�_" �x---
� c •�.r c.....�. ,_ o- /fit:►. f Q ,'i 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. h fi
,-
The design balances several competing requirements. One is to disperse the amount
of parking. Another is to locate principal loading areas where they are not directly rr��
seen from either the street or the trail. A third is to provide a continuation a tXe. 7
parkway -type road throughout the Gateway North. � -
• r U is
2. Relationship of Structure Sc. Site to Adjoining Area. = �'�5```� ' 11= - - `` 1(,,,,_ -7,-,-,, _
The structure relates well to its corporate neighbors, as it uses the ame design
features found nearby. The presence of berms, lawns and swales provide a common
and pleasing transition between the street and the building.
The site is relatively narrow, such that the building's relationship to the River Trail
required careful consideration. As designed, the design keeps from overwhelming the
adjacent river environment.
The north facade's design maintains a good relationship to the River. This has been
accomplished by keeping the structure's overall height to 27 feet, by stepping the
structure's silhouette, and by breaking the facade into sections which alternately
Staff Report to the L93 -0011: Gateway Bldg #8
Page 8
Board of Architectural Review
recede or protrude.
Landscape materials complement the north facade's design. There is a mix of
vertical large -scale evergreens with a set of small-scale deciduous and evergreen
plantings. The larger- scaled trees define sections of the walls, while the smaller - scales
materials act as a cushion and transition between the Trail's pedestrian environment
and the Building's facade.
3. Landscaping and .Site Treatment.
The design provides for use of the grass areas along the south to both blend into the
common 116th Street design, and to provide "biofiltration" for the surface water
runoff. While oil -water separators are still required for other portions of the project's
parking areas, this reflects sensitive site design. See also the discussion in 2., above.
4. Building Design.
The building expresses many of the same features in adjacent structures. There is
a common band of "storefront" in the facade. Colors are identical. Construction is
similar. It is a good neighbor.
5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture.
Lighting standards for the parking areas are consistent with those found throughout
the Corporate Park.
The type, character, scale and location of E.B. Bradley's signs is in keeping with those
found on other Gateway projects.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that Gateway North Corporate Park Building #8 be approved, subject
to the following condition:
1. Signs for the building shall be approved as to general size, location, colors and
scale, such that the applicant can obtain a specific permit by subsequent
administrative approval within these guidelines.
,/2
f 1: •_r C_C� ..�o Ct
BOARD OF ARCN'TL, TURAL REVIEW
DESIG: _ •REVIEW
APPLICATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COly1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
1
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: 06
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection)
Quarter:
Section:
/0 Township: '2
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
3. APPLICANT:* Name: 2vIP 1 tU (A-3-.ti-Lei Address: 1/67P2 II•ft ue.abti ,141 /*). Wb.. TJ)(r,& 1110 •j e: "- 11
Signature: 4 Date: 4.1 3 -4l'
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
Range:
4. PROPERTY Name:
OWNER
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
901p t92_ Patt�-�-
Address: /0 -77.0 j0 et ewicr r)21N e 101
Phone: -11o3
I/WE,[signature(s)]
(2
swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract pufchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this
application are true and correct to the •
best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: .4114-1-11
• n.•..0
ATTACHMENT A
DUO-11-1u ur HNLtil I =L &. iAL tiEVIC .W
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIt ;ION.
Page 2
CRITERIA
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision- making on your proposed project.
Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how
your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient,
attach additional response to this form.
1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to
provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual
impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site.
(*), ikolt1) Ftwa.---0;
Rt-i 1,6. l; .o LiA4RJArgersk.4 7c, FMC:N -4-119
I: •
;et uPt"c .416 QN62- O.t&x::- .
2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of
safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
RESPONS
aIL2 tILI')U-I4 445E V7i 11i6(0,1 ) WItL �c
69141114.--. ry�e ° Cmm� LiCl�tr frr / ? Fp164- �evo '`1114 >> '' 't� .. L �_ I,�(( ' cola tic
R! Ci I1 • till el%IYl y 1,1 F lk(P LG�� r STflt i`l� I5-1 14.1 t uol i -Viev,
Ra (1+� aft - 5391 jMco- ric61.0 (41COKE, 15;i4D is blb
176 ktircA4 150-4,1C1 f51 1 Lai -Icy%. D214,12 bp1`k(l. f M d Use_..
tt .) /110 (ui•t , atilifi,Vont JI.tiatubt1 1 f tet
L
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC ,,_ Page 3
3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and
provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important
axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour-
aged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom-
plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be
effective in winter and summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and
pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land-
scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the
building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONS :
� 1 11- .iD cx 6 It-1 Wi tH G'[ I7C-1u N OCT
"c t--r ' ii gfx76 E r 1xvo fit, f 1 Dj 4C� '2.M 144,
i 2tt fry ,1 \.b►�tT4 X11= (`1 2b V. 1-"12.e. �rM. P�+L. ��I tYY'b'0t•Ici LOtu i I1
I � (<)tiii -fir-. t IcYtial 1171plialet' FL* 6119 WM, t u'.1-02 J Qi0A10. .
H a t
AFiliV-ETY, ARV etq - Mae; 1407 tbN;77p,,
Aci c " -C-
�� i i .qtr?) f, :► •s 't �i s1 • - I.� , CeNC ► N . A
4. BUILDING DESIGN
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its
design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de-
velopments.
buAt-W or AHL:ril 1 tt: u ;�� L KtVItW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC )N • Page 4
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro-
portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be
consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex-
posed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
RESPONSE;
Du i.V i E 3i _t bt�i 7 "` 19 E L :S.�rv�� e t l?o CIA " t�t�- O oc
Q)tbNPJ c-ir: �L� V1 16- Li ut iscf t i b rr ,62E to
Wd i i f -ICS � �I�l
5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec-
tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale
should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and
proportions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the
guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
RESPONSE:
# 3 r 07' 4 bhp b / ,z x_
lee P n q qe), �=7 (:P1 l7fE9 ra, 132bP'L ire t . `rife? (6N Io')
ee . Wo ex f etiE42. iPL. iPiuittr2 101,1;009 2aato¢WV rev_
spbpt, _
• ' tsUAKU U - ARUNITEL TU° IL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLI A ION
Page 5
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to•manage
the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for
compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including
the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people -
oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please
describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional
response space, if necessary.
1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area.
\ 13,-V.", 112t oil . btv , r ae c . l�u., LL�i ! _-- A-
%)600ittT (s , ,-- L tLrtFl I•Mpn ;eME31 LOI+ll+7 Ialrlol,
2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment
of public recreational areas and facilities.
3.. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu-
lation. \
lit / ' ' A'AD3
4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary
to the district in which it is located.
ACQ,(20.11.11211•■1(1 bc1X- ftte/ M2er,.
5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im-
pacts.
6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for si gnificant historical features
in the area.
LNG,i5 -
�., ....
EB 4 / 6
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
OAT[wAY
116 TN
TOIIVK,. WAININOTON
71011011•1111
►P 4
architect
IIIN NLINJNIANAYO
SLAW-WASHINGTON
II I
F
1NNONN
6
a
Ile I
)M,n
� y
M 4hr...114wJ
m
W
CA
•••
0,4
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
IMMO NORTH
I ISTH
TUKWILA, wAsHINGT0/,
poi mi204,473•114.
• 'I
architect
'MI ATI RAUH AV
STATlitikAINNOION
1I' 4 1
a
8
H
2
2
r
z
n
z
DNI01Ifl8 DNIISIX3
3d1IDSONVI ONILSIX3
1N3WdO13A30 3Hfllfld
riot
�e >Ar
s b s
3dY3SONV1 ONILSIX3 —
CI
2
0
rl
H1110S AtM 111NIDtl4V4 1SY3
m
07
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
110TH $TTTTT
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
201 i 1 I7 111.
L•
ag 17111 NIEPUN61N AV
51801E 21IMNNION
1 1 1 6 1
arthtect
...
-,V.
"...I. V::::.,,....
"._T
-... q,17
AA
6' ill III 1 `l llitliiiE!
i3 i !Ii'vrliiIp ti iiii
f f
!
`c6
3i a zx$ .. a Y M
,,,,5 o00
�� (+n n nnn
CI
2
0
rl
H1110S AtM 111NIDtl4V4 1SY3
m
07
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
110TH $TTTTT
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
201 i 1 I7 111.
L•
ag 17111 NIEPUN61N AV
51801E 21IMNNION
1 1 1 6 1
arthtect
...
-,V.
"...I. V::::.,,....
"._T
-... q,17
AA
XI 0, o.
`c6
7f
...
.{ni
. .... m
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY MONTH
111111 ......
TUKWILA. WASHINGTON
111:04,433•1111•
L..
aGM NILIKALANLY
stAnit 1..sneastoN
6 1 I 11
aichitect
...L.,,L,
81..b
•,‘...• .r
.......
4
6 6
Y....•
..,
tfriol
....
,...
.0-.1 wi 21YDf
m
co
**.
cn
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATIWAY NORTH
111ITH
TUKWILA. WASHINGTON
pig 1111206/ 411.611111
reSI
gghVg Inn INIENAGG•
SIAM( BASHH(110Ii
1 111 1
aithstect
rn
r-
23
tn
-NI
0
33
v
33
z
m
Qo
P
r
z
+L
4f
1Vri 31 4 t 714i
Barghausen
Consulting Engineers Inc.`
Land Planning. Survey 1 Engineering Speck:11/11
urn 12........x. •... .... v.0.. :o., Ir • I:r>
FACILITY
BRADLEY COMPANY
NOTON
A NEW FACT
TOR: THE E.B.
Jr' GATEWAY MONTH
IISTN
TYII B.C.E. WASHINGTON
NI
B.CE JOB NO. 4788
0
77:e .33 lift
fK�1'Ti ,We ,1(S. WA3 : S
SUM NI5 5 ,.
0 0
4 1 4 1
arefutecd
Project Narrative
The E.B. Bradley Company is a wholesale distributor of plastic
laminates, cabinet hardware and miscellaneous supplies to cabinet
manufactures and suppliers. The building program requires a
receiving area which will accommodate 1 large semi -truck (once a
week) and smaller vans for dock high, a shipping /will call area
separated from receiving for on grade access and UPS, and an
office area with second floor.
The,site is a part of the Gateway North Corporate Park project
and abuts So. 116th and the Duwamish River. The site layout
reflects the park existing street scape of bermed front landscape
area buffering the parking areas and setting the building back
from the street edge, providing for a spacious entry along the
access route. The large loading dock area is placed so as not to
face directly either to the road or the river. The intent is to
develop the adjacent site with loading opposing. The loading is
being shielded by the building from the major site access, and
via landscaping and screen wall adjacent to the river. Vis44s to
the river will be provided between building areas and with 2 or
more buildings in the future, no massive blocking elements will
occur. Parking is located at both ends, office parking areas for
customers and employees parking at westerly end. The building is
located adjacent to the river bank setback.
The building design reflects not only the existing corporate park
elements, but adds to the facade modulation which will break up
otherwise flat planes of concrete. The building corners have
been cut out to provide modulation and the storefront areas are
recessed to add fenestration relief. Structure is expressed via
concrete columns which are exposed and add additional rhythm to
the facade and texture along the first floor area. The building
is also designed with second floor windows which in the warehouse
will act as clerestories for daylighting. While not being
functionally able to locate the offices directly adjacent to the
river, the river facade is being detailed as if it were
storefront. Again the columns are exposed providing the
structural expression as well as the rhythm and texture like, a
storefront. The area will be bermed as much as possible. The
recessed wall will be scored similar to the windows and a paint
band imitating.the dark glass will occur. The overall painting
scheme will be the same as the balance of the park.
By utilizing the same detailing, paint schemes, facade treatment,
and materials, this user facility will blend in and will be a key
part of the continuing efforts at Gateway North.
David Kehle
ATTACHMENT B
Robert S. Betts, Inc.
,may 7, IgR3
Mr. Ron Cameron
City Engineer
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Land Management
Conservation and
Development
�..,..�� -.
700 108th Avenue NE
Bellevue, WA 98004
Re: Phillips Appeal of Noise Variance; staff support
Dear Ron:
FAX 206/462 -9761
Phone 206/455 -9640
I am prepared to assist the City of Tukwila in this matter. My role will be to act
as a staff member, and prepare the staff report on this appeal to the Board of
Adjustment. I will rely on existing reports, files and materials.
My draft staff report will be ready late Monday, May 10th. My smooth report will
be ready Wednesday, May 12th. I will need the assistance of Mr. Shelton of your
department to answer questions and to provide some documents. I will interact
with members of the Community Development Department and with Martin Palmer
of WSDOT.
My fees for this service will be for two phases, the total of which will not exceed
$2,300.00
Phase I: Preparation of the staff report not to exceed $1500.
Phase II: Follow up and presentation to the BOA, if necessary. Not to exceed
$800.00
I will bill the Department of Public Works at 75.00/hour plus any peripheral
expenses at cost plus 10% and mileage at .28 /mile.
Thank you for this opportunity to assist you and your department.
Sir rely,
Robert S. Betts
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
"Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists"
May 6, 1993
Phil Fraser
City of Tukwila Public Works Department
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: Gateway Corporate Center Building No. 10
Our Job No. 4733
Dear Phil:
RECEIVED
MAY 7 - 1993
' ESTATE
As requested, I have reviewed the proposed site plan layout and storm drainage system for
Building No. 10 at the Gateway corporate center. The existing site consists of nearly 100 percent
impervious area. The proposed development will decrease the impervious area by approximately 10
percent. Since the entire site currently drains into the existing storm system and eventually through the
storm pumps located along the Duwamish River, there will be a net decrease in surface water runoff
entering the storm system. The existing storm pumps are privately owned and were overhauled
approximately three to four years ago and are currently functioning without any apparent capacity
problems. The pumps are also inspected on a regular basis. Since the proposed project will result in a
net decrease in storm flows to the existing system, we can conclude that the existing conveyance system
and storm drainage pumps have adequate capacity for the proposed project and will not be adversely
impacted.
If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this issue, please contact
me.
DKB /tb
4733C.001
cc: Bob Hart, Kemper Real Estate
Dave Kehle, David Kehle Architect
Sincerely,
-411Afd-/
Daniel K. Balmelli, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Home Office: 18215 72nd Avenue South • Kent, Washington 98032 • (206) 251 -6222 • Fax (206) 251 -8782
California Office: 4612 Roseville Road, Suite #103 • North Highlands, California 95660 • (916) 348 -3057 • Fax (916) 348 -0953
�•..�(
-,..
IVE.MPER
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206/241 -1103 • Fax 206/241 -2191
May 5, 1993
Robert Betts
Consultant
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Bldg 10 - Gateway Corporate Center
Remediation
Dear Bob,
ReaL esTaTe
manacemenT
Attached is a copy of the Assessment and Remediation report by
GeoEngineers which addresses the petroleum- related contamination
found at the Bldg 10 site. The contamination was discovered and
remediation occurred in 1989. Analysis of soil and groundwater
samples in the area after the remediation was completed, detected
either zero or below- significant levels of contamination.
A representative of GeoEngineers was on site during the entire
process and in addition to monitoring the remediation for Bedford
Properties, acted as the agent for the EPA.
A visual and olfactory inspection of the site by GeoEngineers
following demolition of the Allied building in 1992 indicated no
apparent residual contamination.
Sincerely,
4E7 kLAN.J1--
Robert Hart
Development Manager
RECEIVED
MAY 0 51993
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Bedford Properties, Inc.
12720 Gateway Drive
Suite 107
Seattle, Washington 98168
Attention: Bob Hart
DECLARATION OF EASEMENT
THIS PT ^LARATION OF EASEMENT ( "Declaration ") is made by and between
BEDFORD PROPERTIES, INC., a California corporation, and PETER B.
BEDFORD AND KIRSTEN BEDFORD, husband and wife ( "Declarants ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Declarants own certain real property (the "Property ")
located adjacent to the Duwamish River in the City of Tukwila,
Washington which consists of six (6) lots (A; B -1; B -2; C -1; C -2; C-
3) (referred to collectively as the "Lots "), depicted on the site
plan on Exhibit A and more particularly described in Exhibit B
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
WHEREAS, the Property includes a private road (currently designated
as 116th Street) (the "Road ") that extends between East Marginal Way
South and the east boundary of Lot A, more particularly described in
Exhibit C attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein;.
WHEREAS, Declarants wish to grant cross - easements for the benefit
of each lot which shall be binding on all future owners of the Lots
(such owners being referred to herein collectively as the "Parties ");
N0W, THEREFORE: Declarants hereby declare that the Lots shall be
held, sold and conveyed subject to the following easements- which
shall run with the Lots and shall be binding on Parties having or
requiring any right, title, or interest in the Lots or any part
thereof, and shall inure to the benefit of any successor of either
Declarants or Parties in the ownership thereof:
1. Road Easement
The Parties, their employees, contractors, agents and invitees and
their tenants and their employees, contractors, agents and invitees
shall have a perpetual non - exclusive right of way and easement to go
upon and use the Road.
1
THENCE North 15° 27' 21" East, 25.00 teat;
THENCE North 74° 32' 39" West, 62.74 feet;
THENCE South 48° 02' 30" East, 56.02 feet;
THENCE South 74° 32' 39" East, 12.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
PROJECT: SEAGATE CENTER
September 1, 1989
2908.37
, .
The cost of maintaining or modifying the Road shall be borne
proportionately according to the land square footage of each lot in
accordance with Exhibit D attached hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein.
2. Mutual Ingress and Egress Easements.
The Parties, their employees, contractors, agents and invitees and
their tenants and their employees, contractors, agents and invitees
shall have a perpetual non - exclusive right of way and easement to use
the paved areas located on any adjacent lot located within 15 feet of
the benefitted lot's common property line to the adjacent lot for
ingress, egress and vehicle maneuvering.
The cost of maintaining or modifying the paved areas subject to
this Declaration shall be borne entirely by the owner of each lot
uncipr which the maintenance or modification is required.
3. Fire Sprinkler Water and Domestic Water System Easement.
Each Party is granted a construction easement to go upon any
adjacent lot to the point -of- connection of the existing fire
sprinkler water system piping to install a new fire sprinkler water
line and tie -in to the existing system.
Each Party is granted a construction easement to go upon any lot as
required to the existing stub of the domestic water line in order to
install new domestic water lines.
(a) Construction costs. The cost of constructing either the fire
sprinkler water lines or the domestic water lines shall be borne
entirely by the owner of the benefitted lot and such costs shall also
include the cost of restoring the servient lot to the condition
existing prior to the construction activities.
(b) Maintenance Costs. The cost of maintaining those portions of
the fire sprinkler water system running under the Road shall be borne
by the Parties in proportion to their square footage in accordance
with Exhibit D. The cost of maintaining the remaining portions of
the fire sprinkler system shall be borne entirely by the owner of
each lot under which the maintenance is required.
The Parties shall have the responsibility of carrying out any
maintenance or repair of the lines running under and across each
party's respective lot with the right to prompt reimbursement from
the owner of the other lot of such owners share of the expense of
maintenance or repair.
In the event a party fails to commence any required maintenance or
repairs under and across that party's lot within a reasonable time
after written notice from the owner of another lot, the owner of the
H: \RSO \B0296- 89.002 \easement 2
THENCE North 15° 27' 21" East, 25.00 feet;
THENCE North 74° 32' 39" West, 62.74 feet;
THENCE South 4$° 02' 30" East, 56.02 feet;
THENCE South 74° 32' 39" East, 12.60 feet to the FOINT OF BEGINNING.
PROJECT: SEAGATE CENTER
September 1, 1989
2908.37
other lot may perform the work and obtain reimbursement from the non-
performing party's share of the expense.
Maintenance costs shall include the cost of restoring the servient
parcel to the condition existing prior to maintenance activities.
4. Storm Sewer'Easement.
Each lot owner shall have the responsibility of carrying out any
maintenance or repairs of the storm sewer lines, french drains, and
grass lined swales running on or under their own lot. The storm
drainage trench located at the City of Tukwila's right -of -way
adjacent to East Marginal Way South shall be maintained between the
outfall at catch basin #27 to the outfall at the Duwamish River (as
depicted on Exhibit A) and shall be borne by the owners of the Lots
in proportion to their square footage in accordance with Exhibit D.
In the event a lot owner fails to commence any required maintenance
or repairs on, under or across their lot within a reasonable time
after written notice from the owner of another lot, the owner of the
other lot may perform the work and obtain reimbursement from the
owner of the lot of such owner's share of the expense.
5. Indemnity; Liability.
Each party shall forever defend, indemnify, and hold the other
party harmless from any claim, loss or liability arising out of or in
any way connected with that party's use of the easements created by
this Declaration or arising from any action undertaken by that party
pursuant to construction or maintenance, unless the claim, loss or
liability is proximately caused by the negligence or willful conduct
of the other party, or its employees, contractors, or agents. In the
event of any litigation or proceedings brought against any party and
arising out of or in any way connected with any of the above events
or claims, against which one party has agreed to indemnify the other,
the indemnifying party shall, upon notice from the other party,
vigorously resist and defend such actions or proceeding through legal
counsel reasonably satisfactory to the other party, at the
indemnifying party's expense, and pay any amount awarded against that
party which that party is otherwise required to pay pursuant to the
conditions set forth in this Declaration.
6. Benefit and Burden.
The easements created by this Declaration shall be for the benefit
of and appurtenant to the Lots as specifically described above, and
shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of any and all portions
of the Property regardless of the type of intensity of development
thereon, and whether a portion of the Property is subdivided or
developed separately. The benefits and burdens shall run with the
land so benefitted or burdened as specifically described above and
each and every portion thereof.
H: \RSO \B0296- 89.002 \easement 3
THENCE North 15.0 27' 21" East, 25.00 feet;
THENCE North 74° 32' 39" West, 62.74 feet;
THENCE South 48° 02' 30" East, 56.02 feet;
THENCE South 74° 32' 39" East, 12.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
PROJECT: SEAGATE CENTER
September 1, 1989
2908.37
7. Enforcement.
In the event of any breach of the provisions of this Declaration,
the aggrieved party shall be entitled to exercise any remedies
available at law or in equity, including the remedies of injunction
and /or specific performance. In the event litigation is commenced to
enforce or interpret the provisions of this Declaration, including
any appeal therefrom, the prevailing party shall recover from the
other party, in addition to all other costs and damages, reasonable
attorneys' fees as determined by the judge at trial or upon any
appeal.
8. Notice.
Any notice under this Declaration shall be in writing and shall be
effective when actually delivered or, if mailed, when deposited
postpaid. Mail shall be directed to the address of the record owner
of the subject property or to such other address as a party may
specify by notice to the other party.
9. Binding Effect.
The covenants contained in this Declaration are not personal, but
shall run with the properties and shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the respective heirs, personal representatives,
transferees or successors in interest of the Parties.
10. Amendment.
This Declaration may not be modified, amended or terminated without
the prior written approval of the then owner or owners of the Lots
who are benefited or burdened by the provision of any amendment to
this Declaration.
11. Waiver.
No waiver of any of the provisions of this Declaration shall be
effective unless it is in writing, signed by the person or entity
against whom it is asserted and any such written waiver shall only be
applicable to the specific instance to which it relates and shall not
be deemed to be a continuing, or future waiver.
12. Severability.
If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Declaration
. shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable
in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall
not affect any other provision, and this Declaration shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had
never been contained in this Declaration.
HMSO 4
THENCE North 15° 27' 21" East, 25.00 feet;
THENCE North 74° 32' 39" West, 62.74 feet;
THENCE South 48° 02' 30" East, 56.02 feet;
THENCE South 74° 32' 39" East, 12.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
PROJECT: SEAGATE CENTER
September 1, 1989
2908.37
13. Applicable Law.
This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Washington.
r
DECLARED this /)2 day of November, 1989.
DECLARANTS:
BEDFORD PROPERTIES, INC.,
a California corporation
By
Joseph`S. Layman
Its Vice President
'..01.QC.0 {Z Z /!
Kirsten Bedford
La. I /1-' o�`c� -u
Peter B. Bedford
By: BEDFORD PROPERTIES, INC.,
a California corpora -Lion,
Their Attorney -In -Fact
7
BY:
Joseph/S. Layman !%
Its Vice President
H:1RSO1B0296.89.0021eascment 5
YMV 4.14. .. •.Y .rte .��.� �..������. -�.
THENCE North 15° 27' 21" East, 25.00 feet;
THENCE North 74° 32' 39" West, 62.74 feet;
THENCE South 48° 02' 30" East, 56.02 feet;
THENCE South 74° 32' 39" East, 12.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
PROJECT: SEAGATE CENTER
September 1, 1989
2908.37
East Marginal Way South
DUWAMISH RIVER
6 Z 1
r1
f
LI
•fj.
:1.
I H
a
6or
261,428 S.F.
•
0
•
•
0
9
z
System Outfall
0
UD
riC.w.00d41v ......
THENCE North 15° 27' 21" East, 25.00 feet;
THENCE North 74° 32' 39" West, 62.74 feet;
THENCE South 48° 02' 30" East, 56.02 feet;
THENCE South 74° 32' 39" East, 12.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
PROJECT: SEAGATE CENTER
September 1, 1989
2908.37
Exhibit "A"
Z
0
cc
0
Z
0
0
t--
0
W
0
a
0
0
ICEmrER
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206/241 -1103 • Fax 206/241 -2191
May 5, 1993
Ron Cameron
City Engineer
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: SEPA - E.B. Bradley Co. - Gateway North
Dear Ron,
ReaL ESTATE
manacemenT
This letter provides an update to the January, 1989 traffic study
prepared by TDA Inc and addresses the mitigation discussed at the
pre - application meeting for the E.B. Bradley building (Bldg 8).
Our most current information on Gateway North's square footage and
usage is as follows:
Bldg Total sq. ft. Office Warehouse
1 59,300 15,418 43,882
2 54,179 16,6;85 37,494
3 28,510 7,698 20,812
4 37,679 11,052 26,627
5 36,554 13,159 23,395
6 50,254 12,899 37,355
E.B. Bradley 42,155 4,000 38,155
TOTAL 308,631 80,911 227,720
Shown below is a comparison of the above actual and proposed Bldg
8 figures with Table 3, page 12 of the Traffic Study:
A.M. Peak Total P.M. Peak Total
TDA Actual TDA Actual
Office 205 232 214 243
Warehouse 466 372 451 360
Total 671. 604 665 603
The actual use for Bldgs 1 through 6 and the proposed use for Bldg
8 indicate that the daily trips for the above buildings are less
than projected at full buildout. There is still a potential for
approximately 70,000 square feet of additional office and warehouse
buildings at Gateway North.
Mg 0 5 1993
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
.
IVEmPER
REML eSTaTe
manacemenT
Per our discussions, our Contractor is budgeting the channelization
work in conjunction with Bldg 8. Any subsequent mitigation
(traffic signal) will be analyzed with subsequent development
projects within the park.
1 understand that the City is procuring estimates to do asphalt
overlay work along East Marginal Way. If it's convenient, please
include the channelization work in the estimates. It might be
cheaper for us to have the City's contractor perform the work.
I am including a copy of the 1989 TDA. Traffic Study for your
reference. Please let me know if you need additional information.
Sincerel,
/: 1
Robert Hart
Development Manager
KimrER
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206/241 -1103 • Fax 206/241 -2191
May 5, 1993
Ron Cameron
Jack Pace
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: SEPA - E.B. Bradley Co. - Gateway North
Dear Ron and Jack,
Rea eSTaTe
manacemenT
This letter is to clarify discrepancies between stated square
footage numbers for the proposed E.B. Bradley building (Bldg 8).
The square footage indicated on the SEPA checklist was approximate.
The square footage shown on the recently submitted site plan shows
the accurate number and should control.
Sincerely,
;12
Robert Hart
Development Manager
RECEIVED
MAY 0 51993
COiV:I\IIUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
IVEmrrR
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206/241 -1103 • Fax 206/241 -2191
May 5, 1993
Ron Cameron
City Engineer
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Bldg 8 - Gateway North
Riverbank Erosion
Dear Ron,
Reap esTaTe
manacemenT
I recently met with Phil Fraser, Andy Levesque with King County,
and Dan Balmelli of Barghausen Engineers to discuss erosion at the
riverbank along Gateway North. At that meeting we tried to
determine the extent of the erosion, possible options to fix the
problem, responsibilities for maintenance, and timing.
As a quick background, Bedford Properties completed the Riverbank
work in 1989. This work was accepted by King County, the governing
authority at the time.. The entire length of the riverbank was re-
shaped and planted in order to provide adequate stabilization. In
addition, fish habitats were created which include logs rooted with
large rocks. These habitats also helped control erosion along the
river. An easement was recorded in favor of the City of Tukwila
which clearly places the responsibility for riverbank stabilization
and maintenance upon the City of Tukwila. A copy of the easement
is attached for your reference.
The extent of erosion is fairly severe at two locations, and is
evident to various lesser degrees along half of the river along
Gateway North. We agreed that the first step in resolving the fix
is to have the riverbank surveyed.
We discussed several options to fix the erosion which include
cutting the bank back at a 2 to 1 slope from the existing eroded
grade. This is not an acceptable option from our perspective.
This would entail moving the existing trail back, moving the
drainage system of perforated pipe and french drain, and taking
land from the adjacent lots. Not only would this be an expensive
option for the City and leave us with an undesirable lot
configuration, but it would probably not be a permanent fix;
providing a stable slope configuration is exactly what our
Contractor did during the initial construction. The City would
very likely have to repeat the above procedure periodically.
\ r.-. .'t
: :.
MAY 0 61993
CQMMUNITY
ICemreR
•
REM. ESTATE
manacemenT
Another option is to place additional rocks and logs at the
waterline at various locations, then fill with dirt, jute mats, and
river plantings. We believe that this is the best option in terms
of cost and feasibility.
Timing was another matter of concern. Apparently, by calling the
fix a "restoration" requires an incredible morass of agencies,
permits, consultants, bids, etc. The timetable I received from
Phil shows that construction wouldn't even start until 1995! I
suggest the City consider this erosion a minor maintenance problem
and /or an emergency maintenance concern. By waiting a year and a
half, the problem will certainly be much worse.
Without acknowledging responsibility, both Kemper and E.B. Bradley
(Bldg 8) are willing to help the City of Tukwila with the erosion
repair providing that the timing and cost are reasonable. We offer
all the dirt that is required and some heavy equipment time. Our
schedule for earthwork at Gateway North is August and September of
this year.
I suggest the City quickly perform the survey after which we'll
work together to finalize the extent of the maintenance and target
the work for this summer.
Please call me with any concerns you have. We're very interested
in finding an expeditious solution to this problem.
Sincerely,
)?_
Robert Hart
Development Manager
• F;iCE'
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND , i I.I�, 19
WHEN RECORDED RETURN 1W) •2 L
Bedford Properties, Irie. + ^ ..i.t.::
12720 Gateway Drive kc:.' ,,;`'•'� ;
Suite 107
Seattle, Washington 98168
Attention:. Bob Hart
DECLARATION OF EASEMENT
_ r r: '/' .4
CD THIS DECLARATION OF EASEMENT ( "Declaration ") is made by and
11-) between PETER B. BEDFORD AND KIRSTEN BEDFORD, husband and wife
("Grantors") and the CITY OF TUKWILA, a Washington optional
(-\., municipal code city ( "Grantee ").
CT
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns certain real property located adjacent
to the Duwamish River in the City of Tukwila, Washington (the
"Property "), more particularly described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, Grantee is in the process of developing a public
recreational trail (the "Trail ") along the Duwamish River within
Grantee's corporate . limits; and
WHEREAS, Grantee requires access to the riverbank for
maintenance, monitoring, and construction of the Trail and other
public recreational facilities as hereinafter provided and for
construction of possible additional dike /levee and /or riverbank
stabilization improvements; and
WHEREAS, Grantor has developed the riverbank which includes
landscaping, sod, and 12'± bic- filtration slope and a french drain
(the "landscaping, 12'+ bio- filtration slope, sod and the french
drain are hereinafter referred to as the "Landscaping ") as depicted
in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, and desires to maintain the Landscaping and any future
hardscape amenities constructed by Grantor with Grantee's approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits and
conditions described herein, Grantor hereby conveys and grants
Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual nonexclusive
Easement (the "Easement ") (more particularly described in Exhibit
C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference)
across,.along, in and upon, the Property, subject to the following
terms and conditions, by which Grantee agrees to be bound:
H. \RSO \10296.89.001 \esmnt3.rvr 1
EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED
King Co. Records Division
•
By /. /.: ��.-, , Deputy
90032.31504
1. Use of the Property.
The Easement granted herein shall be for the purpose of
providing Grantee the right to landscape, develop, and maintain
the Trail and for installing, maintaining and providing certain
recreational facilities for public use. The use of the Easement
and the Trail contained therein shall be restricted to pedestrian,
equestrian and bicycle use. Grantee warrants and represents that
it will prohibit camping, campfires, motorized vehicles except
those required to construct or maintain any improvements within
the Easement, the use of firearms, and any other activities that
would be inconsistent with the safe use of the Easement by the
public. Grantee warrants and represents that it has the power and
will use such power for the benefit of Grantor to promulgate and
enforce such other rules and regulations pertaining to the public's
use of the Easement as it may deem fit and proper to promote safe
and equitable use.
The Easement shall also be used for the purpose of
maintaining, monitoring, constructing and stabilizing the riverbank
and /or additional dike /levee systems. In the event that Grantee's
plans for the Easement would interfere with or potentially cause
the destruction or removal of any of the current or future
improvements made by Grantor within the Easement, Grantee shall
first meet with Grantor to discuss how best to minimize the
economic and aesthetic impact of such plans.
2. Construction and Maintenance.
The design and construction of the Trail, shall be at the sole
cost and reasonable discretion of the Grantee. Grantee agrees to
design the Trail and locate other facilities within the Easement
to accommodate Grantor's use of the Property not within the
Easement (the "Development ") and any future plans for the
Development. Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration,
Grantee shall be responsible for all maintenance incurred with
respect to the Easement at the area depicted on Exhibit B as "City
Maintained.Area ".
3. Timing of construction.
Grantor and Grantee understand and agree that the time at
which Grantee will develop the Trail is unknown at present because
of the necessity of Grantee to acquire additional right-of -way and
funding necessary to construct the Trail. Grantee agrees that
Grantor may, with the prior written consent of Grantee, provide
additional improvements within the Easement pending construction
of the Trail. Grantee shall have sole discretion in determining
whether or not to approve any improvements within the Easement, but
such discretion shall be based upon whether the improvements would
interfere with or be inconsistent with Grantee's use of the
Easement. Such consent shall be made in a timely manner and shall
H: \R5O \B02 96.89.00 I \e;mnt 3. rn 2
not be unreasonably withheld.
Grantee's approval of landscaping or other development by the
Grantor within the Easement shall not constitute a waiver of
Grantee's rights under this Easement to construct and maintain the
Trail, nor shall any delay in construction of the Trail constitute
an abandonment or release of Grantee's right to develop the Trail.
4. Costs.
(a) The cost of and responsibility for maintaining the
Easement shall be borne by the parties as set forth below:
GRANTOR: Grantor shall bear all costs and maintenance
responsibilities for the Landscaping. However,
CD should Grantee do anything whatsoever that
In negatively affects the ability of either the french
drain or the bio- filtration slope to provide water
N drainage from the Property, then Grantee shall
construct, install and maintain at its own cost and
CD
CD expense an alternative drainage system that is
comparable to the current drainage system.
GRANTEE: Grantee shall bear all costs and maintenance
responsibilities for the Trail, any improvements
constructed by Grantee within the Easement, and any
riverbank and /or additional, dike /levee systems
constructed by Grantee.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions in Paragraph 4(a) Grantor
shall not be excluded from participating in future Local
Improvement Districts for improvements to the Easement as depicted
in Exhibit B.
(c) In the event that either Grantor or Grantee fails to
commence any required maintenance or repairs on, under or across
their respective areas of responsibility within a reasonable period
of time after written notice from the ot.hc,r party, the other party
may perform the work and obtain reimbursement from the
non- performing party for the non - performing party's share of the
expense.
(d) In the event that Grantee determines that any facilities
or improvements within the Easement must be removed pursuant to the
provisions in Paragraph 1, Grantee, shall bear the entire cost and
burden of removal.
H: \R50180296.89,001 \esmnt 3.rvr 3
5. Indemnity.
Grantee shall forever defend, indemnify, protect, and hold
harmless the Grantor from and against any and all costs, expenses,
charges, fees, claims, loss, or liability, or any portion thereof,
arising out of, in connection with, or relating to the Easement
unless the claim, loss or liability is proximately caused by the
negligence or willful conduct of Grantor. Such indemnity shall
include, without limitation, the following:
(a) Injury or death to persons;
(b) Damage to either the property, improvements or
facilities;
(c) Claims of third parties (including governmental
agencies) for damages, penalties, response costs,
injunctive, declaratory or other relief; and
(d) Mechanic's liens;
In the event of any litigation or proceedings arising out of
or in any way connected with any of the above events or claims,
against which Grantee has agreed to indemnify Grantor, Grantee
shall, upon notice from Grantor, vigorously resist and defend such
actions or proceeding through legal counsel reasonably satisfactory
to Grantor, at Grantee's expense, and pay any amount awarded
against Grantee which Grantee is otherwise required to pay pursuant
to the conditions set forth in this Declaration.
.6. Successor.
This Easement shall be recorded with the King County Auditor
and shall constitute an easement and servitude running with the
land, inuring to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
7. Applicable Law.
This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in
•accordance with the laws of the State of ,Washington.
H:1RSO\B0296•89.0011eamnt 3.rvr 4
...,-
Any notice under this Declaration shall be in writing and
shall be effective when actually delivered or, if mailed, when
deposited postpaid. Mail shall be directed to the address of the
record owner of the subject property or to such other address as
a party may specify by notice to the other party.
DECLARED this jc /- day of. December, 1989.
GRANTORS:
,- / 1 /
KIRSTEN BEDFORD
PETER B. BEDFORD
CD
L( )
) By: BEDFORD PROPERTIES, INC.,
a California corporation,
CD Their Attorney -In -Fact
CD
Q`
By: / :.%
Jo eph %S . Layman f
Its Vice President
GRANTEE: .1 - 5-9'0
CIT OF- •TX
Glj Y L. \AN DUSEN, MAYOR
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
MA: ,•E ANDERSON, CITY CLERK
AP VE_ AS 'YO FO 4:
- V
0 FICE OF THE Y ATTOR EY
H; \RSO \80196.69.00 I \esmnt 3.1vt
5
'Z1
5,
0 .1; 4 •ft,1(,OI
DUWAMISH RIVER
I0/
k
East Marginal Way South
L1
I)
544.61
N
3 •1.0.1.1.11
•
•
•
•
•
•
C,~
O
1
o
o-
43 0
h
•
MD
m
1)
h
o •
•
•
i
w
0
•
n
•
•
COMPOSITE LOT.CONFIGURATION
ICEmPt R
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
,12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206/241 -1103 • Fax 206/241 -2191
May 5, 1993
Ron Cameron
City Engineer
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Bldg 10 - Gateway Corporate Center
River Protection Easement
Dear Ron,
ReaL ESTaTe
manacemenT
Attached is a copy of the River Protection /Recreation Trail
Easement which was made in December, 1991. As you recall, this
easement replaced existing and inadequate easements and was
endorsed by Tukwila's Parks and Recreation, the Green River Flood
Control Zone District, Public Works, and the City Council.
The City has in their files drawings by Barghausen Engineers that
detail sections along the river. The easement area allows for
flood control, landscaping, riverbank stabilization, recreation
trail and road.
Unless the regulations have changed, the easement should be
current.
Sincerely,
Robert Hart
Development Manager
E EE Iv,` D
MAY 0 5 1993
COMMUNI'T'Y
DEVELOPMENT
reference as if set forth in full.
Page 1 of 2
Filed For Record At The Request Of
9112171259
King County Real Property Division
RIVER PROTECTION /RECREATIONAL TRAIL EASEMENT
th
THIS AGREEMENT made this ? r day o
6- 1991 -018
DUWAMISH RIVER
between !,&l)Fv/2 () n,CVE4 -0P 4 F v l 1-
m GRANTOR, and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington,
the City of Tukwila, Washington and the Green River Flood Control Zone,
District as tenants in common, as GRANTEES:
WITNESSETH: The Grantor, in consideration of mutual benefits, receipt
rm.(
of which is acknowledged, and the benefits which will accrue to the land of
VeGrantor . by the exercise of the rights herein granted, do hereby remise,
r-1 release, and perpetually grant unto the Grantees, as tenants in common, thier
G9 successors and assigns, an easement and right of way for the purposes
hereinafter stated along the left bank of the Green /Duwamish River, within a
r'(strip of land as constructed or reconstructed on the following described
property:
That portion of revised Lot 3 of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No.
91 -4 -BLA as recorded under Recording No. 9105231162, records of King County,
Washington, lying Northerly of the following described line:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
Said easement and right of way is based :4: i:•e •.;
following agreements:
1. The grant contained herein is a covenant running with the land.
2. By the acceptance of this grant the Grantor and Grantees mutually
agree that this instrument does hereby supersede, extinguish and relinquish
those certain instruments and rights acquired under Recording Nos. 5479828
and 5928214.
3. This easement grants and conveys to the Grantees those rights and
interests in the real property herein described as authorized in Sections
86.12.020, 86.15.080, 86.15.100 and 86.16.120 of the Revised Code of
Washington (RCW).
4. No structure, fill, or obstruction shall be permitted within the
River Protection Easement unless otherwise approved by the Grantees.
5. No party shall take any action on the described easement that would
injuriously affect or render the easement appreciably less convenient and
useful to any one of the other tenants in common.
6. Grantor and Grantees are subject to the terms and conditions as
described in Exhibit "B ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference as if set forth in full.
Page 1 of 2
VER PROTECTION EASEMENT
PUWAMISH RIVER
Together with the right to enter upon the above described lancl to
conrt.ruct, reconstruct, maintain, and repair a bank protection and/or other
flood control works, including all appurtenances thereto, together with right
to trim, cut, fell and remove all such trees, brush, other natural growth,
and obstructions as are necessary to provide adequate clearance and to
eliminate interference; with or 'hazards to the structures.
The consideration above mentioned is accepted, as full compensation to
the exorcise of the rights above granted.
To have tend to hold, all and singular, the said easement and right of
way together with appurtenances unto Grantees, thipr successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, j C:rtntor h
year first above written.
By:
IIy:
ed this instrument the day and
El)FOIX1) DEVE
COMPANY
- t2t5jn
'\/ 19)2F.11:6.0
OR
GRANTOR
STATE OF Wigam )
Rt1 COSTA) ss
COUNTY OF )
On this day of 19 ` / , before me
me personally appeared
and b- 5 (C- /C- --
to me known to be trh
and
of the corporation that execu•ed the foregoing inmtruwtrt, and acknowledged
said instrument to be the fr and voluntary act and deed of said corporation
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and an oath stated that
is authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the
corporate seal of said corporation.
GIVEN under ' my hand and official seal, the day and year last above
written.
1/i c.rL .Pre Sr GL2.n 'C
r1vrprot.bum
NOTARY PUBLIC in lad for ti ?3 Sta
residing at; _
My appointment s
Page 2 of 2
OFFICIAL SEAL
LISA A. KUHN
NOTARY PUOUC — CALIFORMA
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
My commiuion esOu Jaw 21, 1111
EXHIBIT "B"
1. Use of the Easement. The City of Tukwila's (City). use of the Easement
shall be for the purpose of landscaping, developing and maintaining the
Easement for public recreational trail and road purposes and of installing,.
maintaining and providing for public use of recreational facilities thereon.
The use of the recreational trail will be restricted to pedestrian and
bicycle use. The use of the road will be for vehicular traffic. Camping,
campfires, the use of firearms and any other activities that would be
inconsistent with the safe use of the Easement by the public will be
prohibited. In addition to the restrictions on use provided herein, the City
shall have the power to promulgate and enforce such other rules and
regulations for use of the trail and /or road by the public as it may deem fit
and proper to promote safe and equitable use.
2. Construction and Maintenance. The design of the public recreational
trail and /or road shall be in the sole discretion of the City. The City
agrees to make reasonable attempts in designing the public recreational trail
and /or road to accommodate any plans for development by Grantor on property
adjacent to the trail and /or road. All design, engineering and construction
costs incurred shall be at the developer's and /or City's expense. The City
shall be responsible for all maintenance and maintenance costs incurred with
respect to the trail and /or road. The construction and maintenance of trail
and /or road systems and associated landscaping shall be in accordance with
the most current riverbank stabilization studies conducted for this easement.
3. Timing of Construction. Both parties understand and agree that the time
at which the City will develop the recreational trail and /or road is unknown
at present because of the necessity to acquire additional right -of -way and
the funding necessary to construct the trail and /or road. Grantor and the
City agree that Grantor may, with the prior written consent of the City, make
temporary improvements to the Easement pending construction of the trail
and /or road. The City shall have sole discretion in determining whether or
not to approve any improvements in the Easement which would interfere with or
be inconsistent with the City's use of the Easement for a recreational trail
and /or road. In the event that improvements are made on the Easement with
the City's consent, the City shall bear the cost of removal of such
improvements at the time of trail and /or road construction.
The City shall not be responsible, however, for paying the cost of relocating
or reinstalling such improvements, or for paying the costs of installing such
improvements incurred by the Grantor, or for paying the cost of replacing
said improvements. The City's approval of landscaping or other development
by the Grantor in the easement area shall not constitute a waiver of the
City's rights under this easement to construct and maintain the recreational
trail and /or road, nor shall any delay in construction of such trail and /or
road constitute an abandonment or release of the right to develop such trail
and /or road by the City.
4. Indemnity. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
Grantor from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, or any
portion thereof, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to
property occasioned by a negligent act, omission or failure of the City, its
officers, agents and employees, in constructing and maintaining the
recreational trail and /or road.
Kemper Real Estate Management Company
12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, Washington 98168 • 206/241 -1103 •
Mr. Rick Beeler
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Permit - Gateway North
IVEmPER
ReaL ESTATE
manaGemenT
Fax 206/24 91 1993
April 0, 1993
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Dear Rick,
We are in the final stages of completing a sales transaction for
approximately three acres at Gateway North with the E.B. Bradley
Company. This land, and the proposed building are part of a 1031
(tax- deferred) exchange. In addition, the company will be moving
out of their existing facilities in the Georgetown area. For both
of these reasons, it is imperative that the new building be
complete by the end of 1993.
In January, Jack Pace indicated that if we (the applicants) did our
part, the Shorelines and Building Permit process could be completed
in four months. I realize that Planning has recently had some
staff changes and they are under a heavy workload. However, the
Gateway North transaction, and related collateral transactions, are
already underway. Kemper and the E.B. Bradley Company are willing
to explore any and all options in order to help the City of Tukwila
process the Shorelines application to meet the schedule.
With this letter, we request that the City of Tukwila replace the
Gateway North (E.B. Bradley) application with the Gateway Bldg #10
application which has already been submitted and is scheduled for
the May 27th B.A.R.
I'd like to meet with you to discuss the attached schedule to
determine other options that could be pursued in order for this
project to stay on track.
During the four years that I've been with Bedford /Kemper, the City
of Tukwila has been very cooperative. Because of our teamwork
approach, the buildings, land sales, and tenant improvements at
Gateway and Gateway North have been completed on schedule and in
conformance with the City's (and Kemper's) requirements and high
design standards.
I look forward to working with all of you again on this project.
Sincere
y.
Robert Hart
Development Manager
Work Item April May June July August September October November December
Shorelines
Pre -Application X
,Landscape
t. �zvil
Elevations X
Site Plan X
SEPA
Application
Staff Review
BAR (Design Review)
Building Permit
Construction Documents
Submit for Permit
Review Process
Bldg Permit
Construction
Site/Earthwork
Ftgs/Foundation
Slab
Tilt -up Walls
oof Structure
Storefront
Final Grading
Paving/Curbs
Landscaping
Occupancy Permit
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X 4-16
X X X
X X
X X X
5-27 X
XXXX
5-28 X
X
X X X X
XXXX
7-30 X
X
XXXX
X X
X
X X X
X X XX
XX X X
X
X X
X X X
X X
X
X X
X X X
XX X X
X X X X
X X
X
A , -�.� ' r't`e "o ( RJr P f f S ( a l? v c-
{
TIP ICA "S712.6- rsC -APf`"
2T'
�- 5'z-7A,
Lc.) 5 r-aLrZ _,.icLsz' Qc t-
et r ti L 5
ti4.slyzc
r-Ac tri G cge e-r1 w H 2 D h c a ,.. G
wK0cc -t FAcG:
s i rE pR.oeJ ►Ge.
sav -rdei
rACrisLG c.JES r ALorcG RIVc`12
6/4c4 K Ls/ 2O pr QLDGS_
�I.. ,roa(c')
•
Z/Z
FA 1PIa kof rK4)*t.D ACRR °ss
f e C1' srY�...op* Rives
9103070405
AND REMEDIATION OF
SUBSURFACE PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION
FORMER TIME -DC TRUCK TERMINAL
FOR
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
lu
w
mmailm
,1Y4; c1Ni 11!!3:I311
40. 40405 [.
. 00
CRSHSL '5409.00
•
':� .
T A B L E O F CONTENTS
SITE CONDITIONS
SURFACE CONDITIONS AND DRAINAGE
SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS
GROUND WATER CONDITIONS
Page No.
1
1
2
2
3
3
PETROLEUM - RELATED CONTAMINATION 4
GENERAL 4
SOIL CONTAMINATION 5
GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION 6
FREE PETROLEUM PRODUCT 7
SITE REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 7
CONCLUSIONS 10
Lf7 LIMITATIONS 10
O
C'
O List of Fig res
N.— Figure No.
O
CD
O VICINITY MAP 1
SITE PLAN 2
SITE PLAN AND GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS 3
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS 4
APPENDIX
Page No.
FIELD EXPLORATIONS A -1
BORINGS A -1
REMEDIAL EXCAVATION A -3
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION A -3
GROUND WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM A -4
GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS A -4
CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM A -4
List of Appendix Figures
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS
LOGS OF MONITOR WELLS
Figure No.
A -1
A -2
A -3 & A -4
Geo *1Engineers
,
REPORT
ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION OF
SUBSURFACE PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION
FORMER TIME-DC TRUCK TERMINAL
FOR
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our services during the assessment
and remediation of subsurface petroleum- related contamination at the site
of the former Time -DC Truck Terminal in Tukwila, Washington. The former
truck terminal facility is located south of the Duwamish River and north of
the intersection between 48th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South. The
Lf7
Osite location and surrounding features are shown in Figure 1. The general
CD layout of the site is shown on Figure 2.
Cr) The former truck terminal facility included 15 underground steel tanks
O
Q) used for the storage of diesel, gasoline, lubricating oil and waste oil.
These tanks included ten 20,000 - gallon diesel tanks, two 10,000 - gallon
diesel tanks, one 10,000 gallon gasoline tank, one 10,000 gallon lube oil
tank and a 5,000 gallon waste oil tank. The underground tanks were removed
from the site during February 1989. The locations of the former tanks are
shown in Figure 2. Soil contaminated by petroleum products and free
(floating) product consisting of diesel fuel were encountered during removal
of the underground storage tanks.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of our services was to monitor the tank removal activities,
explore and evaluate the extent of subsurface petroleum- related
GeoP.Engineers
contamination, develop recommendations for remedial measures and monitor the
remedial activities at the site. The scope of services completed during
this project includes:.
1. Monitor the removal of the fifteen underground storage tanks.
2. Subcontract and monitor the drilling of eight exploratory borings
and the installation of monitor wells in each boring.
3. Develop recommendations for remedial actions and monitor the
remedial program.
4. Collect soil and ground water samples from each boring /monitor
well and from the excavation completed for removal of the tanks
and contaminated soil.
•;•
5. Subcontract the analysis of the soil and ground water samples for
qd-
O the presence of petroleum- related contamination.
O
CD
O SITE CONDITIONS
0) SURFACE CONDITIONS AND DRAINAGE
The general layout of the former Time -DC truck facility is shown in
Figure 2. The facility included a corrugated metal building, fifteen
underground storage tanks and three fuel pump islands prior to the remedial
activities. The underground storage tanks and fuel pump islands were
removed from the site as part of the remedial program. The western portion
of the corrugated metal building included remote fueling lines and truck
maintenance facilities. The western portion of the building was demolished
and removed from the site during the remedial program.
The site is bordered by the Duwamish River along the eastern property
line. The surface of the site is relatively level and is covered by
asphaltic concrete pavement outside of the limits of the remedial
2
Geo k! Engi neers
excavations and building footprint. Runoff from precipitation is collected
in a storm drain system and is pumped to the Duwamish River. Runoff from
areas where remedial activities were conducted was diverted to a Metro sewer
line.
SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS
Information pertaining to subsurface soil conditions was obtained by
drilling eight borings (MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -9) at the locations
indicated in Figure 3 and observing conditions in the excavation completed
for the removal of the underground storage tanks and petroleum- contaminated
soil. Details of the field exploration program and the boring logs for MW -8
and MW -9 are presented in Appendix A of this report. The logs for MW -1,
Ln MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -7 are. given in our reports dated April 18, 1989
�d-
O and May 23, 1989. Boring MW -3 was completed by Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
O
CZ) Two general soil units were observed in the remedial excavation and
5 borings at the site. The uppermost soil unit consists of 8 to 10 feet of
brown to gray interbedded silt, silty sand and sand. The lowermost unit
consists of black fine to medium sand. The base of the black sand was not
encountered in the excavation or the borings. Numerous horizontal tree
logs, ranging from 1 to 4 feet in diameter and up to 100 feet in length,
were encountered in the lower soil unit.
GROUND WATER CONDITIONS
Ground water conditions at the site were explored by constructing wells
(MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -9) in each of the borings completed by
GeoEngineers. Construction details for MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -7 are
given in our reports dated April 18, 1989 and May 23, 1989. Construction
3
Geoff! Engineers
details for MW -8 and MW -9 are given in Appendix A of this report. Well
MW -3, installed by Geraghty & Miller, Inc., was included in our field
measurements to provide additional information pertaining to ground water
conditions beneath the site.
Ground water was encountered at depths of approximately 11 to 14 feet
below the ground surface. Water level measurements conducted on June 12,
1989 indicate that the shallow ground water beneath the site generally flows
northeastward toward the Duwamish River. Water table elevations at each
well on June 12, 1989 are shown in Figure 3. Water table contours based on
interpretation of the June 12, 1989 measurements are also shown in Figure 3.
Lin
PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION
GENERAL
MSubsurface petroleum- contaminated soil was detected during the removal
O of the fifteen underground storage tanks from the site. The tanks were
removed between February 15 and February 22, 1989 by Gaston Brothers
Excavating. Free (floating) petroleum product was detected on the water
table in portions of the excavation completed for removal of the tanks.
The extent of subsurface contamination at the site by petroleum
products was evaluated by:
1. Physical examination of soil samples for visual indications of
petroleum contamination.
2. Conducting field sheen tests on the soil samples.
3. Sampling the well casings for presence of free (floating)
petroleum products.
4
i ^0(-.
Geo gEngineers
4. Analyzing soil and ground water samples from the remedial
excavation and the borings /wells for the presence of petroleum -
related contamination. The laboratory data are presented in
Appendices B, C and D.
SOIL CONTAMINATION
Soil samples were collected from beneath the tanks during the tank
removal program and analyzed for the presence of total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes (BETX).
The concentrations of TPH and BETX detected in the soil samples collected
during the tank removal program generally exceeded Ecology's cleanup
guidelines for underground petroleum storage tanks. The analytical results
VD
Ofor soil samples collected during the tank removal program are summarized
CD
in Table 1.
O
The extent of the petroleum- contaminated soil was evaluated primarily
Ca
Q� during the excavation phase of the remedial program. The remedial program
is described in a later section of this report. Soil samples were collected
from the base and sidewalls of the excavation and submitted for analysis of
the presence of TPH and BETX. The locations from which soil samples were
collected from the excavation are shown in Figure 4. The analytical results
for soil samples from the excavation are summarized in Table 2. Excavation
of soil continued until the concentration of petroleum- related contaminants
in the remaining soil were less than Ecology's cleanup guidelines. The
limits of the excavation are shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4.
Soil samples were also collected from MW -1 through MW -9 and submitted
for analysis of the presence of TPH, BETX and /or fuel hydrocarbons. The
analytical results for soil samples from the borings are summarized in
5
Ge01 EllgilleerS
Table 3. Petroleum- related contaminants were not detected in the soil
samples from MW -1, MW -2, MW -3 and MW -5 through MW -9. TPH was detected at
a concentration of 6.3 ppm in the soil sample from MW -4. BETX and fuel
hydrocarbons were not detected in the soil sample from MW -4.
GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
Ground water samples were collected from MW -1 through MW -9 and
submitted for analysis of TPH and BETX. The analytical results for the
ground water samples from the wells are summarized in Table 4. Petroleum -
related contaminants were not detected or were detected at concentrations
much less than drinking water quality standards in the ground water samples
from MW -1 through MW -9.
(n Ground water samples were also collected from the remedial excavation
qicit
and from a temporary recovery well that was installed in the remedial
f`.
excavation. The analytical results for the ground water samples from the
O
excavation and recovery well are summarized in Table 5. Petroleum- related
contaminants were detected at concentrations greater than drinking water
quality standards in the ground water samples collected from the excavation
during the initial portion of the remedial program. Petroleum- contaminated
soil and free product were present in the excavation during the initial
portion of the remedial program.
Petroleum- contaminated soil and free product were removed from the
excavation as part of the remedial program. Petroleum - related contaminants
were generally' not detected, or were detected at concentrations less than
drinking water quality standards, in the ground water samples collected from
the excavation during the later portion and after completion of the remedial
excavation.
6
Geol Engineers
FREE PETROLEUM PRODUCT
Free (floating) product was encountered during removal of the
underground storage tanks. Analysis of petroleum product present in the
excavation indicated that the product was diesel fuel.
SITE REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES
Gaston Brothers Excavating excavated approximately 14,500 cubic yards
of soil contaminated by petroleum products between February 15 and May 26,
1989. The limits of the excavation are shown in Figure 4. The excavated
soil was stockpiled on -site.
Free product and contaminated soil were found to extend horizontally
beneath the western portion of the terminal building. A portion of the of
the building was demolished during March 1989 to remove the contaminated
soil and free product beneath the building.
As described above, soil samples were collected from the base and
sidewalls of the excavation and submitted for analysis of the presence of
TPH and BETX. Excavation of soil continued until the concentration of
petroleum - related contaminants in the remaining soil were less than
Ecology's cleanup guidelines. Ecology's petroleum cleanup guidelines at the
time of the site remedial work are summarized below.
PARAMETER CONCENTRATION
Benzene 660 ppb
Toluene 143 ppm
Ethylbenzene 14 ppm
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 200 ppm
Free product that was encountered in the excavation was recovered with
the use of a product recovery well and by skimming product from the water
7
•
Geo En��i veers
surface with vacuum trucks operated by Environmental Transport, Inc. and
Northwest EnviroService, Inc. The majority of the free product was
recovered by skimming the surface of the water in the excavation with a boom
and removing it with the vacuum trucks. Water and product that was removed
from the excavation with the vacuum trucks was transported to ChemPro's
facility for disposal. Water that was pumped from the recovery well was
discharged to a Metro sewer line (Minor Discharger Permit No. 154).
Contaminated soil that was removed from the excavation was subjected
to a thermal treatment process by Olympus Environmental, Inc. The soil was
treated between July 5, 1989 and October 5, 1989. The th"eTmal treatment
process involved the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons from the soil by the
ur-3O application of heat followed by treatment of the exhaust gases. The
"d'
treatment plant consisted of a diesel -fired rotary kiln with facilities to
1
0 control air emissions. Soil was conveyed to the kiln where the petroleum
Q7 hydrocarbons were volatilized and partially incinerated. The exhaust gas
treatment plant included a bag house and wet scrubber to reduce the emission
of dust and volatile hydrocarbons.
Olympus Environmental monitored the effectiveness of the thermal
treatment process by collecting soil samples at a frequency of about one
sample per 240 cubic yards of treated soil. These soil samples were
analyzed to determine the concentration of TPH remaining in the soil after
treatment. The analytical results are given in Appendix D and summarized
in Table 6. The concentrations of TPH detected in the treated soil averaged
less than 50 ppm and did not exceed 100 ppm. Ecology's current cleanup
guideline for TPH is established at 200 ppm.
8
Geo 1i Engineers
GeoEnginee
effectiveness
GeoEngineers at
treated soil.
concentrations
after treatment
summarized in T
GeoEngineers we
Environmental
s also collected samples of the treated soil to monitor the
f the treatment process. Samples were collected by
a frequency of about one sample per 1,850 cubic yards of
These soil samples were analyzed to determine the
f TPH, BETX and fuel hydrocarbons remaining in the soil
The analytical results are given in Appendix D and
ble 7. The analytical results for the samples collected by
e generally similar to the results obtained by Olympus
a d indicated
contaminants re
guidelines. C
treatment indic
percent of the
The remedi
base of the exc
concrete was ob
excavation was
fabric was pla
treated soil.
Approximat
concrete and w
oversized mater.
An additional 4
treatment proce
Permission for
granted by the
that the concentration of petroleum- related
aining in the treated soil were less than Ecorogy's cleanup
mparison of the concentrations of TPH before and after
tes that the thermal treatment process removed about 98
etroleum product from the soil.
1 excavation was backfilled with crushed concrete from the
ation to about one foot above the water table. The crushed
ained from a recycling plant. The remaining portion of the
ackfilled with treated soil. A layer of woven geotextile
ed over the crushed concrete prior to placement of the
ly 1,000 cubic yards of oversized material (cobbles,
od) were removed from the soil prior to treatment. The
al was transported to the Newcastle Landfill for disposal.
0 cubic yards of soil that was not subjected to the thermal
s was transported to the Ceder Hills Landfill for disposal.
disposal of the untreated soil and oversized material was
ing County Health Department prior to disposal.
9
Geo'� Engineers
. z: J;; 3R; ,31I. """. ;4F!!` K• 1 at l- rippi < ;��'�; v
, _r,...a.....1':t;..C.ii:�i: -'.. ,; r {.y.:....•;>�"at:f( {..,. r c',..' cd+; ;.x}'�"T.4wJf^.y.".':?>t�rr+.:rea
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of our field observations and analytical testing,
it is our opinion that actions to mitigate subsurface petroleum- related
contamination in the vicinity of the former underground storage tanks at the
Time -DC facility have been completed successfully. On -site observations and
chemical analysis of soil and ground water samples indicate that no
petroleum- related contamination of regulatory significance remains in the
vicinity of the former underground storage tanks.
LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for use by Bedford Properties. This
report may be made available to regulatory agencies. This-report is not
L f7
Q intended for use by others and the information contained herein is not
got
O applicable to other sites.
ti
Our interpretation of soil conditions during remediation is based on
CD
O7 field observations and chemical analytical data. It is always possible that
areas with undetected contamination may exist in portions of the site which
were not excavated or analyzed.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services
have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this
area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or
implied, should be understood.
0 0 0
10
Geo 1/�la•
jEngineers
Please call if you have any questions regarding this submittal.
Yours very truly,
GeoEngineers, Inc.
JHB:JAM:sd
Two copies submitted
11:77-Le
John H. Biggane
Associate
James A. Miller, P.E.
Principal
11
777
9 I 03070405
TABLE 1
RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING
OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING TANK REMOVAL
PAGE 1 OF 2
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl—
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Sample
Number(1)
Date
Sampled
418.1(2)
ppm
TLC(3)
ppm
Comments(4)
Tank #1-1
2/15/89
<50
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank #1
Tank #1-2
2/15/89
<50
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank #1
Tank #2-1
2/15/89
<50
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank #2
Tank #2-2
2/15/89
<50
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank 112
Tank #3-1
2/15/89
<50
--
_ --
--
--
--
West end Tank #3
Tank #3-2
2/15/89
130
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank #3
Tank #4-1
2/15/89
16,000
--
--
-- •
--
--
West end Tank #4
Tank #4-2
2/15/89
<50
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank 114
Tank #5-1
2/15/89
21,000
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank #5
Tank #5-2
2/15/89
6,100
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank #5
Tank #6-1
2/23/89
84
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank 116
Tank #6-2
2/23/89
110
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank 116
Tank #7-1
2/23/89
8.1
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank #7
Tank #7-2
2/23/89
110
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank #7
Tank #8-1
2/23/89
34
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank #8
Tank #8-2
2/23/89
760
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank 118
Tank #9-1
2/23/89
57
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank #9
Tank #9-2
2/23/89
220
--
--
--
--
--
East end Tank 119
Tank #10-1
2/I23/89
1,500
--
--
--
--
--
West end Tank 1110
Tank #10-2
2/23/89
1,500
--
--
--
` -- 1
--
East end Tank 1110
Notes: (1) Sample Numbers "Tank //1-1" through "Tank 1115-2" were collected by Gas on Brothets Excavating;
Sample Numbers "T-1" through "T-9" were collected by GeoEngineers.
(2) EPA Method 418.1
(3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method
(4) Tank locations shown in Figure 2
ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion: -- = not tested; Soil samples collected from beneath the tanks.
0
I4
9103070405
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
PAGE2OF2
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl-
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Sample
Number(1)
Date
Sampled
418.1(2)
ppm
TLC(3)
ppm
Comments(4)
Tank #11-1
2/27/89
119
--
--
--
--
--
North end Tank #11
Tank #11-2
2/27/89
6090
--
--
--
--
--
South end Tank #11
Tank #12-1
2/27/89
7310
--
--
--
--
--
North end Tank #12
Tank #12-2
2/27/89
19,900
--
--
--
--
--
South end Tank #12
Tank #13-1
2/27/89
--
--
540
34,000
34,000
20,000
North end Tank #13
Tank #13-2
2/27/89
--
--
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<3.0
South end Tank #13
Tank #14-1
2/20/89
11,200
--
--
--
--
--
North end Tank #14
Tank #14-2
2/20/89
22,300
--
. --
--
--
--
South end Tank #14
Tank #15-1
2/20/89
18,000
--
--
--
--
--
North end Tank #15
Tank #15-2
2/20/89
81,500
--
--
-- •
--
--
South end Tank #15
T-1
2/15/89
5.0
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank #2
T-2
2/15/89
240
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank #4
T-3
2/17/89
30,000
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank #11
T-4
2/17/89
6,600
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank //13
T-5
2/20/89
140,000
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank 1114
T-6
2/23/89
940
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank #9
T-7
2/23/89
16
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank 117
T-8
2/23/89
68
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank #6
T-9
2/28/89
920
--
--
--
--
--
Center Tank #11
Notes: (1) Sampfe Numbers "Tank #1-1" through "Tank #15-2" were collected by Gaston Brothers Excavating;
(Sample Numbers "T-1" through "T-9" were collected by GeoEngineers.
(2) EPA Method 418.1
(3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method
(4) Tank locations shown in Figure 2
ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion: -- not tested: Soil samples collected from beneath the tanks.
9103070405
TABLE 2
RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING
OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING THE REMEDIAL EXCAVATION
PAGE 1 OF 6
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl—
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Sample
Number(1)
Date '
Sampled
Depth
Interval
418.1(2)
ppm
TLC(3)
ppm
Comments
T-10
4/26/89
12-13
1.3
--
<290
<280
1600
1200
T-11
4/26189
12-13
26
--
<280
<280
<280
<560
T-12
4/26/89
12-13
<1.0
--
<300
<300
<300
<600
•
T-13
4/26/89
13-14
1.3
--
<260
<260
<260
<520
T-14
4/26/89
14-15
110
--
<280
<280
<280
<560
T-15
4/26/89
13-14
<1.0
--
<260
<260
<280
<520
T-16
4/26/89
14-15
2
--
<270
<270
<270
<540
T-17
4/26/89
13-14
12
--
<290
<290
<290
<580
T-18
4/26/89
12-13
<1.0
--
<290
<290
<290
<580
T-19
4/27/89
15-16
6.5
--
<290
<290
<290
<580
T-20
4/27/89
14-15
<2
--
<280
<280
<280
<560
T-21
5/04/89
15-16
46
--
--
--
--
--
T-22
5/04/89
15-16
100
--
--
--
--
--
T-23
5/04/89
14-15
460
--
--
--
--
--
(4)
T-24
5/11/89
13-14
2800
--
590
1300
2400
6600
(4)
T-25
5/11/89
13-14
1400
--
<500
760
910
3000
(4)
T-26
5/11/89
13-14
390
--
<550
<550
550
1900
(4)
T-27
5/11/89
13-14
2600
--
1300
1500
3300
8700
(4)
T-28
15/11/89
13-14
1200
--
<500
<5?0
<500
2900
(4)
Notes: (1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4.
(2) EPA Method 418.1
(3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method
(4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample was collected. Area was resampled after additional excavation.
ppm = parts per million; ppb =parts per billion; -- = not tested
ft
li
9I03070405
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
PAGE2OF6
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl-
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Sample
Number(1)
Date
Sampled
Depth
Interval
418.1(2)
ppm
TLC(3)
ppm
Comments
T-29
5/11/89
13-14
3.9
--
<540
<540
<540
<1100
T-30
5/11/89
13-14
7.7
--
<530
<530
<530
<1100
T-31
5/11/89
13-14
15
--
<520
<520
<520
<1000
(4)
T-32
5/11/89
13-14
<2
--
<270
<270
<270
<540
T-33
5/12/89
13-14
300
--
<250
<250
<250
<500
(4)
T-34
5/12/89
13-14
3
--
<260
<260
<260
<520
•
T-35
5/12/89
13-14
1000
--
<310
620
<310
3700
T-36
5/12/89
13-14
90
- --
<270
<270
<270
<540
T-37
5/15/89
13-14
<2.0
--
<130
<130
540
530
T-38
5/15/89
13-14
<2.0
--
<130
<130
<130
<260
T-39
5/15/89
13-14
<2.0
--
<130
<130
<130
<260
T-40
5/15/89
13-14
<2.0
--
<120
<120
<120
<240
T-41
5/15/89
15-16
8.1
<50
<1
<1
<1
1
T-42
5/15/89
15-16
38
<50
<1
<1
<1
<1
T-43
5/15/89
15-16
47
<50
4
<1
<1
4
T-44
5/15/89
15-16
163
100
2
<1
<1
<2
T-45
5/15/89
15-16
12
<50
<1
1
<1
<2
T-46
5/15/89
13-14
--
600
--
--
--
--
(4)
T-47
5/15/89
13-14
--
1000
--
--
--
--
(4)
T-48
5/15/89
13-14
--
1600
36
15
<1
45
(4)
T-50
5/15/89
13-14
--
600
--
--
--
--
(4)
Notes:
(1) ample locations shown in Figure 4.
(2) EPA Method 418.1
(3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method
(4) Additional soil excavated from: this area after sample was collected.: Area was resampled after additional excavation.
ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; -- not tested
9103070405
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
PAGE 4 OF 6
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl-
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Sample
Number(1)
Date
Sampled
Depth
interval
418.1(2)
ppm
TLC(3)
ppm
Comments
T-72
5/17/89
12
--
3000
<1
<1
<1
36
(4)
T-73
5/17/89
10
18
100
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-74
5/17/89
12
--
3000
99
54
39
130
(4)
T-75
5/17/89
12
--
<50
<1
<1
. <1
<2
T-76
5/18/89
12
22
<50
<1
<1
<1
3
•
T-77
5/18/89
12
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
2
T-78
5/18/89
12
13
50
6
8
11
106
T-79
5/18/89
12
74
50
2
<1
<1
6
T-80
5/19/89
16-17
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-81
5/19/89
16-17
--
500
<1
8
<1
21
(4)
T-82
5/19/89
16-17
431
800
<1
<1
<1
52
(4)
T-83
5/19/89
16-17
18
<50
--
--
--
--
T-84
5/22/89
13-14
8.9
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-85
5/22/89
13-14
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-86
5/22/89
13-14
11.3
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-87
5/22/89
13-14
--
300
<1
<1
<1
2
(4)
T-88
5/22/89
13-14
5.7
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-89
5/22/89
15-16
--
<50
<1
<1
3
5
T-90
5/22/89
13-14
22.1
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-91
5/22/89
13-14
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-92
e
l 5/22/89
18-19
<5.0
300
5
, ) 5
<1
12
• ' (4)
Notes:
(1)Sample locations shown in Figure 4.
(2) EPA Method 418.1
(3) Thin -layer Chromotagraphy method
(4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample:: was collected. Area was resampled after additional excavation.
ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; = not tested
0
mis
91030/0405
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
PAGE 5 OF 6
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl-
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Sample
Number(1)
Date
Sampled
Depth
Interval
418.1(2)
ppm
TLC(3)
ppm
Comments
T-93
5/22/89
18-19
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
2
T-94
5/22/89
16-19
<5.0
<50
<1
<1
<1
3
T-95
5/22/89
16-19
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-96
5/22/89
16-19
16.2
<50
4
3
5
17
T-97
5/23/89
16-19
--
<50
<1
<1
<1
2
T-98
5/23/89
16-19
12.4
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
•
T-99
5/23/89
16-19
--
300
8
3
<1
38
(4)
T-100
5/23/89
16-19
<5.0
<50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-101
5/23/89
16-19
--
500
28
12
<1
120
(4)
T-102
5/23/89
17-19
189
300
<1
<1
<1
51
(4)
T-103
5/23/89
17-19
--
500
<1
<1
<1
<2
(4)
T-104
5/23/89
17-19
138
100
18
79
<1
<2
T-105
5/23/89
17-19
73
100
11
<1
<1
<2
T-106
5/23/89
17-19
--
100
22
54
<1
97
T-107
5/24/89
17-19
--
500
<1
<1
<1
19
(4)
T-108
5/24/89
17-19
94
100
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-109
5/24/89
17-19
--
100
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-110
5/24/89
17-19
61
50
<1
<1
<1
<2
T-111
5/24/89
17-19
--
<50
<1
2
<1
<2
T-120
5/25/89
18-19
75
--
<62
<62
<62
<120
T-121
5/25/89
18-19
49
--
<62
<62
<62
<120
Notes:
'1
(1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4.
(2) EPA Method 418.1
(3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method
(4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample was collected. Area was resampled after additional excavation.
ppm - parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; -- = not tested
9 1030T0405
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
PAGE6OF6
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Ethyl-
Total
Sample
Date
Depth
418.1(2)
TLC(3)
Benzene
benzene
Toluene
Xylenes
Number(1)
Sampled
Interval
ppm
ppm
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
Comments
T-122
5/26/89
18-19
51
--
<62
<62
<62
<120
T-123
5/26/89
18-19
64
--
<65
110
<65
340
T-124
5/26/89
18-19
<4.0
--
<65
<65
<65
<130
T-125
5/26/89
18-19
22
--
<59
<59
<59
<120
Notes: (1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4.
(2)EPAMethod418.1
(3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method.
(4) Additional soil excavated trcm this area after sample was collected. Area was resampled after additional excavation.:
ppm =parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; --= not tested;:
{
91030T0405
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES FROM BORINGS
Boring
Sample
Depth
Date
Collected
Field Screening (1)
TPH (2)
(ppm)
Fuel
Hydrocarbons
(ppm)(3)
BETX (ppb) (4)
Headspace
Vapors (ppm)
Sheen
Test
B
E
T
X
MW-1
12.5
03/24/89
240
NS
<5
NT
<5
<5
<5
<5
MW-2
17.5
03/24/89
175
NS
<5
NT
<5
<5
<5
<5
MW-3
12.5
04/03/89
NT
NT
NT
<5
NT
NT
NT
NT
MW-4
8
05/03/89
<100
NS
6.3
<5
<25
<25
<25
<25
MW-5
8
05/04/89
<100
NS _
<1
<5
<25
<25
<25
<25
MW-6
8
05/03/89
<100
NS
<1
<5
<25
<25
<25
<25
MW-7
8
05/04/89
<100
NS
<1
<5
<25
<25
<25
<25
MW-8
13
06/08/89
<100
NS
<1
NT
<25
<25
<25
<25
MW-9
13
06/08/89
<100
NS
<1
NT
<25
<25
<25
<25
Notes:
(1) Measurements for headspace vapors obtained using a BacharachTLV Sniffer
calibrated to hexane (110 ppm = 1% LEL hexane).
(2) TPH analyzed by EPA Method 418.1
(3) Fuel Hydrocarbons analyzed by. modified EPA Method 8015
(4) BETX analyzed by EPA method 8020
B =. Benzene, E = Ethylbenzene, T = Toluene, X = Total Xylenes
ppm = parts pes-million
ppb =.parts per billion
NT _ indicates not tested
Results for MW-3 from Geraghty & Miller
INA
N1\\:
ao
CD
C
Engineers
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES FROM WELLS
WELL
Sheen (1)
TPH (2)
(ppm)
BETX (ppb) (3)
B
E
T
X
MW-1
NS
<0.05
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
MW-2
NS
<0.05
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
<0.5
MW-3
NS
NT
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
MW-4
NS
<0.5
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
8.7
MW-5
NS
0.7
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<4.0
MW-6
NS
<0.5
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
6.3
MW-7
NS
<0.5
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<4.0
MW-8
NS
<0.05
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<1�0 _
MW-9
NS
<0.05
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<1.0
Notes: .:..
(1) "NS^.means no sheen detected on water surface
(2) Total. Petroleum Hydrocarbons. by EPA Method 418.1
(3) BETX by EPA Method 602 :, :
• B = Benzene E:= Eth ylbenzene, T
ppm a park per million•
ppb = paris per'billion
Results 1or.MW=3 from Geraghty & Miller ;:
9103070405
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES FROM REMEDIAL EXCAVATION AND R
Sample
Date(1)
Collected
TPH (2)
(ppm)
BETX (ppb) (3)
B
E
T
X
Comments
W-3
03/23/89
420
375
80
515
435
Collected from excavation
WR-1
03/29/89
275
26.4
<1.0
18.3
31.2
Collected from recovery well
WR-2
03/31/89
20
5
<1.0
<1.0
15
Collected from recovery well
W-3A
05/04/89
10
260
<40
140
140
Collected from recovery well
W-4
05/15/89
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
Collected from recovery well
W-5
05/31/89
<5.0
1.5
<1.0
1.2
8.3
Collected from recovery well
Notes:
(1) Remedial Excavation was completed on 05/26/89
(2) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 418.1
(3) BETX by EPA Method 602
B Q Benzene, E - Ethyibenzene, T
ppm = parts per million
ppb = parts per billion
Toluene, X =Total xylenes
0
rn
Geo NO Engineers
TABLE 6
RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF TREATED SOIL
SAMPLES COLLECTED BY OLYMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Sample No.
TPH(1)
ppm
Sample No.
TPH(1)
ppm
Sample No.
TPH(1)
ppm
Sample No.
TPH(1)
ppm
SSGC -1
78.5
S -13
19.7
S -27
70.3
S -40
33.0
SSGC -2
15.6
S -14
26.0
S -28
36.9
S -41
47.2
SSGC -3
7.9
S -15
46.5
S -29
33.9
S -42
78.8
SSGC -4
59.6
S -17
43.3
S -30
45.3
S -43
37.3
B
25.9
S -18
72.5
S -31
41.5
S -44
38.0
C
46.7
S -19
37.4
S -32
79.4
3-45
27.8
SSG -6
52.6
S -20
15.2
S -33
42.3
S -46
54.9
SSG -7
26.4
S -21
48.8
S -34
78.2
SSG -47
41.9
SSG -8
28.0
S -22
61.3
S -36
71.6
SSG -48
_29.0
S -9
41.3
S -23
74.5
S -37
70.3
SSG -49
32.8
S -10
78.6
S -24
70.0
S -38
40.6
S -51
41.9
S -11
30.0
S -25
37.3
S -39
76.0
S -52
36.3
S -12
23.3
S -26
89.3
Notes:
Total Petroleum. Hydrocarbons. by EPA Method 418.1.;
• ppm = parts per million
Sample No.
TPH(1)
ppm
Benzene
ppb
Ethyl-
benzene
ppb
Toluene
ppb
Total
Xylenes
ppb
Gasoline
ppm
Diesel
ppm
S -1
16
<25
<25
<25
34
<5
89
S -2
46
<25
<25
<25
<25
<5
60
S -3
14
<25
<25
<25
<25
<5
41
S -5
16
<25
<25
<25
<25
<5
17
S -6
13
<25
<25
31
<25
<5
48
S -7
24
<25
<25
<25
<25
<5
87
S -8,
20
<25
<25
<25
<25
<5
120
Notes:
(1) TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 418.1
ppm =parts per, milUon
'pod =parts per billion
■
3
D
7
7
• „•••••.,- „..-- , • • *
0.
I/99 -U7 -4
(9yr
•
MW-9
rtr
84.74
MW-3 6p.
\803 MW-1
5
1
• cP
•0
MW-2
\ • `,
84.12 MW-5 •
83.85 MW-6'
83.65
•
e/MW-4 \ •
.10 MW-7
80 N83.66
Former Building N/
EXPLANATION:
MW-1
84.35
Nk
•
MW-8
84.69
Approximate Limits
Of Excavation
N
Existing Building
0 150
1
300
SCALE IN FEET
MONITOR WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER
WATER TABLE ELEVATION ON 6/12/89
GROUND WATER CONTOUR
BASED ON 6/12/89 MEASUREMENTS
GENERAL DIRECTION OF GROUND WATER FLOW
BENCHMARK AT WATER MAIN LID. ASSUMED
ELEVATION AT 100.00 FEET.
Geo,.Engineers
SITE PLAN AND
GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS
FIGURE 3
Cont. ,,. No. ''7
Epic File No. --C3- Cna I
Fee $ 325 Receipt No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Building 8 - E.B. Bradley Co. - Gateway North
2. Name of applicant: SGA Corporation
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6414 204th St. S.W.
Suite 200, Lynnwood, WA 98036 - c/o David Kehle, Architect 433 -8997
4. Date checklist prepared: 4/13/93
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Start in August, 1993
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No
. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes,
explain. No
-2-
I
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Tukwila Building Permit
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
Building 8 - 38,500 s.f.
Use will be office and warehouse in accordance with the M -1 zoning.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
Location is in Gateway North, bordered by So. 116th Street to the South,
and West, the Duwamish River to the North, and a vacant lot Qe appnoadmiati4
3.5 acres to the East. (See site plan attached L.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
The property lies within the Shoreline 200 foot zone.
..
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC L. .;: Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, L r
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? Less than 2%
c. What general .types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Site was primarily vacant land prior to grading
work in 1989. Soils consist primarily of silty
fine to medium sand with occasional gravel.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. No new fill required.'
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? 'If so, generally describe.
No erosion expectedodue to flat site.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings) ?___
Total will have about 20% building coverage and
60% asphalt.
Evaluation for
-Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
None required
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Auto, truck and equipment during construe-
tion, none being significant. Auto and
truck emissions after construction.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
, that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
During earthwork activity, dust control
measures will be implemented.
3. Water
a. Surface:
I) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
No water on site. Duwamish River is
adjacent to site.
y ".".t. •nr.,. fa..,r .tnM�x .�t.......^anr.l`.: Y.`...M._ x...r..r... .e.. .
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
Yes - Landscaping, parking and building structure
within 200 feet inaccordance with regulations as
shown on the attached site plan.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of. the
site that would. be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
Site is above flood plain.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
No
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
No
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
None
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Storm drainage to be in accordance with
drainage system designed with master plan in
1989. Water will sheet -flow into biofiltratiQn;;.
swales. Outfall is the Duwamish River.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: __
Potential imjacts to be insignificant
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
_ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
___ Weeds and grass - Development will add
trees shrubs and more appealing_ landscapinj__
and vegetation.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
None
valuation for
\--Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of. native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
Landscaping will utilize Northewst
native plant material,grass,_deciduous_____
and evergreen.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have ' been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
None
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
None
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other: None
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
None
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
None
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
None
ri 40. R ,tr:' t:'
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Natural _gas for heat. Electric_____ _
____ for power andlighting,_ __
b. Would your project affect the potential use of, solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
Building would be.designed to
meet State Energy Code.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. None
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
None
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any: N/A
�- h'i'..4rG.•l•�V.•�v�..ww
,Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise .
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other) ?____
East Marginal Way
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
Construction noise from lam to 6pm
Auto and truck traffic will not be
significant.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
Mufflers on construction vehicles.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
Site is currently a vacant lot.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
No knowledge of past agriculture use.
C. Describe any structures on the site.
None
Vi 1,ttin
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be 'demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? M -1
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Light manufacturing
g.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
Urban
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
+/- 50
j•
Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
None required
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
Project will be in compliance with all
applicable codes and ordinances.
-12-
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
Dousing ?__ None`___________
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
N/A
Evaluation for
4`` Agency Use Only
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest_ height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Heiglht is approximately 24 feet .
exterior tilt -up structure with
reveals; Fainted with a three color _
scheme.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
Truck loading is hidden
behind wings of the
_Landscaping, all around
break up
.�t...l,n'is•.:N�..i'.... � ....:^},^:.: tt".}?' F,....,., �.. .�.,wi:'IiSil:! ^....s....;i':', ..
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Tight at_ night- at p rkinn T and 1_ o. dng arras _
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
Street lighting will not have a negative effect.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
Light fixtures will be directed down to parking
and walkways.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
A trail is planned along the Duwamish River.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:__
No negative impact. Project to provide plaza
and /or picnic tables along River.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence' of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
So. 116th Street is the primal road'which
serves Gateway North from East Marginal Way.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
Yes — Bus Routes alonq East Marginal Way.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
Project would provide approximately 65 parking
stalls.
.t.':l�.i:J:...... .: .. .. r ..... {t15... S ". ��� 3'.%'t:'., .. .. ... , or•...trn.r.�rr.. er>ar.w.s .yv.nx..e.n w r.n....r... w .......................o-a.✓N,..
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
Approximately 300 daily trips.
g.
Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
Encourage ride sharing and public -
transportation.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
Increased need is not expected.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
Design factors should minimize impacts on public
services, ie., fully sprinklered buildings
with 24 hour monitoring.
16. Utilities
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
141e at the site:
'water refuse service,
septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
All utilities are stubbed to the site as part
of the master plan development in 1989/1990.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
‘■
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
TO B
D.
Beca
to r
the
When
prop
the
or
ment
1.
2.
,r a:::, :,, •:.u.:.,y .. >.,,:: e.;:.
COMPLETED :Y
SUPPLEMENTAL
(do not use
use these questions
ead them in
environment.
answering
osal, or the
proposal, would
it a faster
ed. Respond
How would tie
to water; emissions
release of toxic
of noise?
,,., ... ,.....,......: ..: -., ,.., .:: i. ...:..,,..•,:,...v rh:r.,.. •r'e:.S:it3:::..::4 " :; ✓.. ... ._.. :.:at45C.... ,,.yJ.p.;;.q.p:y.;
APPLIC
SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
his sheet for project actions)
are very general, it may be helpful
onjunction with the list of the elements of
hese questions, be aware of the extent the
types of activities likely to result from
affect the item at a greater intensity
rate than if the proposal were not .imple-
briefly and in general terms.
proposal be likely to increase discharge
to air; production, storage, or
or hazardous substances; or production
.
Proposed measures
to avoid or reduce such increases are:
How would the
mals, fish,
proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
or marine life?
Proposed measures
mals, fish,
to protect or conserve plants, ani-
or marine life are:
-18-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
- 23-
SHORELINE SUBSTAtr-iAL DEVELOPMENT eWb
APPLICATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Number:
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: & r b 611-1(91, WbVe} -10 C41166.
4fotuet tt?rt Me-o-1,111,16 tirt6 64p Vek.414.1 fi h`( t1EME?U"
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) •
. 1 rt o I i-12
Quarter: Section: P • Township: 2-3 Range: 4
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
3. APPLICANT:* Name: rav [i7 EFL e
Address: 1287 I i }u.lefta LVW .''b. � 1 Glib. iMttb
e• -b1g7
Signature: Date: 13 •� 4 2
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
4. PROPERTY Name: b L�
OWNER
Address: 12120 atiatt R2tsit 'ti 10'1
Phone: ! ' 110V
I /WE,[signature(s)]
swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this
application are true and correct to the
best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: 4- + •q'
AM' 1 4 1!c93
IVJL
DEVELOPMENT
5. Present use of proper' -•: \/kbl.t
6. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project nclude additional future
developments contemplated but not included in this application)'
7. List the master program policies (use program sections or page numbers) which are applicable
to this development: gietie20 FicAlEer Nbmztr tht5
8. List any other permits for this project from state, federal or local governmental agencies for which
you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has
been applied for (and if so, the date of the application), whether the application was approved or
denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit:
/3tlft,o11-1G E12111 rt' - OirtLi or lbr43 6 -
� �1 — o -M ui�
9. Nature of the existing shoreline. Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood
plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such
as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any (to be completed
by local official):
10. In the event that any of the proposed builidngs or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet
above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential
units existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view (to be completed by Local official):
11. If the application invo1' i Conditional Use or Variance, set f Clin full that portion of the Master
Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a
Variance, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official):
12. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within
one thousand (1,000) feet in all directions from the development site:
er)HY119t5V-, Watfilit-1-41 ib keffi Mtc Ctiwbisti1112)1411 b
Vboi,t•tt 1574
k:r7:
Project Narrative
The E.B. Bradley Company is a wholesale distributor of plastic
laminates, cabinet hardware and miscellaneous supplies to cabinet
manufactures and suppliers. The building program requires a
receiving area which will accommodate 1 large semi -truck (once a
week) and smaller vans for dock high, a shipping /will call area
separated from receiving for on grade access and UPS, and an
office area with second floor.
The site is a part of the Gateway North Corporate Park project
and abuts So. 116th and the Duwamish River. The site layout
reflects the park existing street scape of bermed front landscape
area buffering the parking areas and setting the building back
from the street edge, providing for a spacious entry along the
access route. The large loading dock area is placed so as not to
face directly either to the road or the river. The intent is to
develop the adjacent site with loading opposing. The loading is
being shielded by the building from the major site access, and
via landscaping and screen wall adjacent to the river. Vistas to
the river will be provided between building areas and with 2 or
more buildings in the future, no massive blocking elements will
occur. Parking is located at both ends, office parking areas for
customers and employees parking at westerly end. The building is
located adjacent to the river bank setback.
The building design reflects not only the existing corporate park
elements, but adds to the facade modulation which will break up
otherwise flat planes of concrete. The building corners have
been cut out to provide modulation and the storefront areas are
recessed to add fenestration relief. Structure is expressed via
concrete columns which are exposed and add additional rhythm to
the facade and texture along the first floor area. The building
is also designed with second floor windows which in the warehouse
will act as clerestories for daylighting. While not being
functionally able to locate the offices directly adjacent to the
river, the river facade is being detailed as if it were
storefront. Again the columns are exposed providing the
structural expression as well as the rhythm and texture like a
storefront. The area will be bermed as much as possible. The
recessed wall will be scored similar to the windows and a paint
band imitating the dark glass will occur. The overall painting
scheme will be the same as the balance of the park.
By utilizing the same detailing, paint schemes, facade treatment,
and materials, this user facility will blend in and will be a key
part of the continuing efforts at Gateway North.
David Kehle
r<<
BOARD OF ARCW- TECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGLREVIEW
APPLICATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COp1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
R•STAFF>USE;ON
ross- Reference F
1
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Cb
ceipt um r.
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection)
_T1 I xt4kii-Rvtroll
Quarter: Section: ) /0 Township: /4,S Range: 4
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
3. APPLICANT:* Name: r:iv►n h3u,e
Address: t1 7P7 littaNe,13bt3 AM bp.
e•
C i,Ub . l (o >
Signature: Date: • 4 -15
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
4. PROPERTY Name:
OWNER
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
961m- P66um--k
Address: /D CIPALLYIY t;021\* (A1 r er
Phone: 111[o3
/ / ��
I /WE,[signature(s)] . : . __.
swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract intchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this
application are true and correct to the 11.. Y._., , , , _
best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: V
1
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLI( ;ION
Page 2
CRITERIA
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project.
Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how
your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient,
attach additional response to this form.
1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to
provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual
impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site.
RESPONSE: . }.
trauC7 - 2Witht6 II-i� CUIt,rnIq l5 t11 t6 '�+ �L�hDitilcl 1204
WNri , \IlePx.:, AND ). 1k451t1 Vion,lei BFI I -tb -tn6 AO MUM a5VOloptit t
146 1411' &e ) . IO") Fil7a5.1; lovx) U*11x ilgt•I,l "Co
E1-1u %Afton-4qt I>.a Bu i tA9R-I q
Dab U ?tb --Iflc 0,82. 4456k„
2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of
safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
RESPONS
ti WARD 41206.11 ` ik HI Lola,
,t,i , Voiai &try! d., alma, WILL
IMi tb¢.. - Lildt'i.(, regorvim- bc.,0 -tile/ aka.. l'int,ittr GUtu m
60 '"fib MFLIMOT .4449 fi aisli41 N ito e 1116 ob
WA ail 3r• fAQokt "Vii; k? — its
bit)
ct---.00,0 - mot-c/4 ifi6
lb :0 s5tloct d4ito uw., thiptr
- 1X1 11-6. (t ettu,ht t P5-tteni,k
A I2 - Diu,
� � l
• • BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC` 'ION
r
Page 3
3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and
provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important
axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour-
aged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom-
plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be
effective in winter and summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and
pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land-
scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the
building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONS :
y iJ .+ ZE .Ad
1 w.
L. It OF
,s1
Lam- 1t1 iwa 1A111 11t (112b Le.. 1146 12b1t, woofici Wm, 1c Id
t bti�l H� U(151 1i1G Wu k, t tc4o k Q t41Q -ib
Hat apt: antteomaso,
tikc, hloarro 1k Ent i� r'L ieini2 e9 t i i4
&Q.t o ,eH -ifl t2.1 VIA b Ct-uc¢5 Whitt awn
4. BUILDING DESIGN
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its
design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de-
velopments.
• • 'BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC )N
Page 4
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro-
portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be
consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex-
posed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
RESPONSE;
111- lottillitHOO 1\612RAV5
DI,Ii,vb irtgi 1),k4 Gtr L ►ru,l thaw VlI - * , 0..o
att a5- Jo i i5 "t E t tro wt (tik{,
Writ 416 tlI siroff ?Q - - i14.
5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec-
tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale
should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and
proportions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the
guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
RESPONSE:
I6t-11 I- /jvg b !' fan irf ; -
I� 1Nq loll fl"! *-1 DbP 5' 0 1Vie. QSN
ltoD 09' e*E ? ll-11WOVO RAVIDOUr
t3Pbp(oy_
' BOARD OF ARCHITECTUr) AL REVIEW
• DESIGN REVIEW APPLI( ;ION_
,_. Page 5
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage
the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for
compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including
the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people -
oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please
describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional
response space, if necessary.
1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area.
urn1t UL&trot-! 1101, 6tw�1,1.,614c� Ipt, W -A eel4�r_ b �j-� { ltt
YW&iof 1 ( '/ ! =rL tucift "iN6 tiKt i}.I1 Y4"I eMCNl7 LoITit� 0011211\lt
etert9 x1031 .- I- rl % CZUe4-2,.
2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment
of public recreational areas and facilities.
FtWiPil -fir -- -ter: t 1T2hiL) o(fair-7 ad
416 ribiLr CAr-M0q btr �tL�Ur. Ptve_A9A-rosifizti,
3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu-
lation.
pver-totb3 Goattrtiat Rico 76 i1IA i t iit,►� 10 i-bk ■0;
l'f etv *it ortb G v_ eieC.0 tvi►c4.
4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary
to the district in which it is located.
A(QI2C.1 i1b1rly L b z& ,:(1166/ Wb261-IF1tkz
5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im-
pacts.
awl) bir Pt" tau - t I gut i L /01V055
6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features
in the area.
1,66 iev-r
project Narrative
The E.B. Bradley Company is a wholesale distributor of plastic
laminates, cabinet hardware and miscellaneous supplies to cabinet
manufactures and suppliers. The building program requires a
receiving area which will accommodate 1 large semi -truck (once a
week) and smaller vans for dock high, a shipping /will call area
separated from receiving for on grade access and UPS, and an
office area with second floor.
The site is a part of the Gateway North Corporate Park project
and abuts So. 116th and the Duwamish River. The site layout
reflects the park existing street scape of bermed front landscape
area buffering the parking areas and setting the building back
from the street edge, providing for a spacious entry along the
access route. The large loading dock area is placed so as not to
face directly either to the road or the river. The intent is to
develop the adjacent site with loading opposing. The loading is
being shielded by the building from the major site access, and
via landscaping and screen wall adjacent to the river. ViS.tas to
the river will be provided between building areas and with 2 or
more buildings in the future, no massive blocking elements will
occur. Parking is located at both ends, office parking areas for
customers and employees parking at westerly end. The building is
located adjacent to the river bank setback.
The building design reflects not only the existing corporate park
elements, but adds to the facade modulation which will break up
otherwise flat planes of concrete. The building corners have
been cut out to provide modulation and the storefront areas are
recessed to add fenestration relief. Structure is expressed via
concrete columns which are exposed and add additional rhythm to
the facade and texture along the first floor area. The building
is also designed with second floor windows which in the warehouse
will act as clerestories for daylighting. While not being
functionally able to locate the offices directly adjacent to the
river, the river facade is being detailed as if it were
storefront. Again the columns are exposed providing the
structural expression as well as the rhythm and texture like,,a
storefront. The area will be bermed as much as possible. The
recessed wall will be scored similar to the windows and a paint
band imitating the dark glass will occur. The overall painting
scheme will be the same as the balance of the park.
By utilizing the same detailing, paint schemes, facade treatment,
and materials, this user facility will blend in and will be a key
part of the continuing efforts at Gateway North.
David Kehle
.. ... ,.., ....
I I j I V t• I
V II • LI/ IV
o • O • o 1
9103070405
•
—J
Z 3af101A
1
-"-I0
w 3
rn
Gl 73
rn
z
>.0
z rn'
r�
00
f7 C
z
-I 0
0
z
= NO I 1VNV1dX3
J,
c� 0
1
a 3
m
1
MMI
Duwan,ish River
N
cn
O O
cn
G)
0
0
AWEWENIM
N
J
O
EMEMIEM
UO! A OX3 ;o
0
o
AYM31V9
v
m
1/99-07 -¢ REJ:W 6•b -89
9103070405
N
0
r
N
N
•
▪ D 1
CZUD
3 D = 3
r -c
En 1–
7 m m
( - ) r
rn>ZO
vrD
Zmm' -+
ADO
--razz
Drc
co —1 '0
m C7
c
- Z
• c
m3
✓ co
Hrn
Z
rn
:NOIIVNV1dX3
1 j
CO
• : • •
cri
•
6ulplln9 Jauno3
• V
A m
•
• A• CO CO el •
• •co ▪ • 0 •
•
pJ
CO CO • n p• ' N T
co • • • �•a)••
•
CO &• m • •� • N t •
V •
CO •
•
N
•
• •_
V •
CO �` V
N
• • • d?
•
N O (D • A •
• • • •
J
o • •
• ▪ •
■ - •
• • • ( l
•
V N •
.....& 0) 0) •
N • CO •O ▪ AO 0
• CO •
..a W W CO N $ • •
• • A
• N
8. A
• • • •
W •
..
A• CO
Concrete
6ulplln8 6ulislx3
UOREAEOX3 }p 1IIUrl
•
•
N N
N �a
0
•
•
•
•
V
•
m
•
CO
•
N •
•
•
W W
N
•
•
0) N
• •
L• . O
•.
3A18a AVM31VJ
— o
0
CO
LC)
SNOI1V3O1 31dVIVS IIOS
W
•
to D -I In
C Z 'U D
3 D =
r -c
D r
rnrn
rrn0r
rn D Z 0
or n
n D
zrnrn1-4
cn D
w -i r�D
M 4")
C
N Z
C
rn
r co
�+ rn
zu
rn
N
:NOIlyNVidX3
6u!plln8 iawio3
•
fNJ
•
•
m
N
•
0
•
•
V
0)
•
V
•
U
fJ W r • ▪ • 8 gJ • W 2r N 8 J
•
• -' 0
• •
U • ▪ • .►
• i
g m
-4 • • • • • -, • • �v 0 OA
rgp • 0) 0• • • CO • co QO • A � ) g• N U CO ," ., CO • • (� W
•uo • • • • • g • • • •� A W N
co i� A• •
�• �•: • N • : W • •
cn V • U : U• O •
• • •
•
co co
• �• _ N • no
•
N • N
• •
UOREAEOx3 ;O 3!W!1
L
Concrete
6u!plln8 6ugslx3
ooAW tplWnMn0
0
•
U
•
CO •
•
W
•
0) N
O •
-& 0
• •
3A11:10 AVM3IVO
-- o
.N
n
rn
z
rn
rn
CO
CD
CD
0
CJ1
m
CO
"
\
p)
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
110TH STREET
TUKWILA. WASHINGTON
1041911.1991
1107111HA1NBANAV5
SLATTLEWASNINO10N
9 0 1 1 1
An,T.
,111,,
ifs;
O
M
0
H
S
z
(1)
ONIO1III9 ONIISIX3
1
- moos AIYM 1YNID IVN LSY3
A NEW FACILITY
POR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NOIITN
I1STN $TTTTT
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
1011117.1117
11171 NITNUA&N AY S
SEATTIEWASHIN3TON
1 1 1 1 1
^
Cl e� �-
I
1 PLANT LEGEND
RI - i 1 0 o
11 111111 i111111111liFiII
III 0 1 , 1 1 1
i 1 1 il 1 1 _1
1 c 1
1
■
1
Yy pp ry
i1 � 9 111
� 'i iQ
1
Gil nn R n'0
.,9,17,4,
b
1
- moos AIYM 1YNID IVN LSY3
A NEW FACILITY
POR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NOIITN
I1STN $TTTTT
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
1011117.1117
11171 NITNUA&N AY S
SEATTIEWASHIN3TON
1 1 1 1 1
^
4MNI
'441 tc OaaLp7
.......9w
.,9,17,4,
m
CO
Chl
',..
a,
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
IIITH
TUKWILA. WASHINGTON
2011133.11997
11171111ERURBAN AV S
SEAMEWASHINCITON
9 1
1 6
3
tia
m
W
A
N.
Q)
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
110TH
TUKWILA. WASHINGTON
2011+]1•{99]
12171 INTERURBAN AV
SFATTLEWASNNOION
9 1 1 { 1
4711417r+ a%IS
hom
0
m
•-■
0
NO11VA313
EB2/6
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
116T11 STREET
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
206/.33.'997
csre GIERUIVANAVS
SEAT711 WASIIINGION
9 I I 1
:14141
Cy` e
...Mir Vt. •aaps•gte,rtaril ■■■•nr.
''.• e.'1^.- ...1,WIre
'''"""kB
4.4
a...
:et
-----'-------'-------'
•
S F4
m
co IA NEW FACILITY
FOR. THE E.B. mune mCOMPANY
Ca GATEWAY NONTI1
,.. II~"
0) ,..,•°'`A. WASHINGTON
'^^.",^".
Inn ref NURIANAVS
—
—
■
�°
. .
~^~~,^
.— I.
ONIOlIOB ONIISIX3
if
3dVOSONV1 ON W SIX3
Ir
0
0
i
HIHO S AVM IYNIOHVLY 1553
" u1
0
0
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
114T5 STREET
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Eli •:rn e.1111_:.RVI11vS
5(x11,1 AM.. ,..".`ON
r e , 4 L
architect
'017
c�i
•
-1 lr I
•
PLANT LEGEND
I ; 11' l h Hil Vii I! 't 'r'
1 1
g
P„ e :r: Fa . g
N, o F. ii
G
HIHO S AVM IYNIOHVLY 1553
" u1
0
0
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
GATEWAY NORTH
114T5 STREET
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Eli •:rn e.1111_:.RVI11vS
5(x11,1 AM.. ,..".`ON
r e , 4 L
architect
'017
c�i
•
-1 lr I
•
0
m
A NEW FACILITY
POR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
SATIWAY NORTH
91111tN OTTTTT
T000RA. WASHINGTON'
99/I133 :1997
12111 N1ENAOW AY S
SF.Sfl ASHIHOT011
1 1 1 1 1
..
d,
• /.0611
,.6.■
•.t r R• .c.urwn...t .1.11640
'., eDMV.D
VI.'
' P
00 1It/p
�.
urw
N:fTV L.Zr'1
' pi,
camas.
6.
iw■ F. • w
m
a
N
• r
A NEW FACILITY
ThR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY
OATIWAY NORTH
11 0TN STNIIT
TONI11L11. WASHINGTON
pig miIOUi)I•999r
L• 0
1784 WIENIMIGW AVL
91A lLWASNINGION
9 1 I 1 1
~
r•••LN
i}llititi
tFtt' tL
. 8
Iz
1.
4.
.r274 11
11
1 ,i
3 .3
1
E
S
1,
7 11
MOOS AVM-WilloVVOI LSVIS
A NEW FACILITY
Pip VHF F R PRAM. EY COMPANY
GATIWAY MONTH
TVIIWILA, WASHINGTON
266'6,1•6667
INN ret.sulaw AVS
MAINSTMANNGION
6
11
--Ar.tqt
5 b• hsnaf
.^ • ■•■t•I■
tmt. 461,6-
6.1
m
A NEW FACILITY
FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY dOMPANY
GATIWAT NORTH
IISTH
TUKWILA. WASHINGTON
-ev
206/433.1997
N1110313414 AY
SEAMEWA130NOION
p 1 I 1
W4.2.
-N,
MoolP
4