Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L93-0042 - BOEING / CRULL JOHN - ADDITION AND FIRE STATION / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)l93-0042 boeing fire station addition sepa ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) King County Environmental Dh ision SEPA Section Dcpart ncnt of Development and Emvironment Senvices 3600 - 13Gth Place Southeast ScIkwe. Washington 98006 -1.00 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFI Ur � (206) 296.6602 FOR BOEING FIRE STATION ADDITION RE Threshold Determination: Date of Issuance: File Number: File Name: Proposal Contact: Address: Proposal Description: Location: Community Plan: Drainage Subbasin: STR: Environmental Planner: Determination of Nonsignificance March 30, 1993 C2)2 -4 53 Boeing Fire Station Addition John Crull, 393 -7299 Planning and Program Support Boeing Support Services P.O. Bux 3707, M3 67 -59 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 Construction of a 2,800 square foot addition to an existing 11,200 fire station building on a 511.33 acre parcel at Boeing Field. Boeing Field building 3 -840 located on the east side of East Marginal Way approximately 1500 feet south of the intersection of East Marginal Way and 16th Avenue in Tukwila, Washington. N.A. Duwamish River WH 28 -24 -04 David Radabaugh NOTES A. This determination does not constitute approval of the proposal. B. The City of Tukwila's Sidewalk Ordinance (Tukwila Municipal Code 11.64.021) may apply to this proposal. C. This proposal will not cause any additional surface runoff. D. An environmental assessment conducted on this site identified a tetrachloroethylene (PCE) concentration of 6.4 ug /Kg immediately south of the construction site. The proposed project will not be affected by this or contribute to PCE "Preserving the Balance" 1 Boeing Fire Stat&t March 30, 1993 Page 2 concentrations. The environmental assessment recommends additional testing for the presence of PCE. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION In making this threshold determination the Responsible Official, pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -330, has reviewed the environmental checklist, the amended environmental checklist and staff recommendation; the supporting documents listed therein; consulted with the agencies listed therein; and considered mitigation measures which the agency or the applicant will implement as part of the proposal. As required by WAC 197 -11- 335, the Responsible Official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal and concludes that it does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. COMMENTS AND APPEALS Any person, affected tribe, or agency may submit comments to the lead agency within fifteen (15) days of the date of issuance of the determination. Any appeal of this threshold determination shall be filed with the King County Environmental Division within fifteen (15) days of the date of issuance and accompanied by a nonrefundable filing fee for $125 made out to the King County Office of Finance. Any appeal shall state with specificity the reasons why the determination should be reversed. Written comments or appeals must be received in the King County Environmental Division before 4:30 PM on April 14, 1993. Please reference the file numbers when corresponding. Comments or appeals should be addressed to: King County Environmental Division 3600 - 136th Place SE Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 ATTN: SEPA Section ef.2e.e., L,T/2-1 Responsible Official Dat City of f' 7'ulcwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director February 24, 1993 David Radabaugh, Environmental Planner King County Environmental Division Department of Parks, Planning and Resources 3600 136th Place SE Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 RE: Response to Boeing Field Fire Station Addition King County File #C9202753 Dear Mr. Radabaugh: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced proposal pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT No adverse impacts to the City of Tukwila are anticipated as a result of this proposal. Please note, if the value of this addition increases the value of the existing building by 25 %, floor area by 20% or exceeds $250,000, the proposal is subject to the City of Tukwila, Sidewalk Ordinance (TMC 11.64.021). It appears from the description of the proposal that the 2,800 square foot addition is a 25% increase of the existing floor area. Therefore, as a mitigating measure the Boeing Company is subject to paying their fare share of frontal improvements along East Marginal Way S. For further information on this matter please contact Ron Cameron, City Engineer, at 433 -0179. I would like a copy of the final mitigated determination of non - significance for this proposal sent to me. If you need additional information from our Department, please call Jack Pace at 431 -3670, who will gladly assist you. Rick Beeler, Director cc: Ron Cameron, City Engineer Jack Pace, Senior Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (2067)431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 King County Environmental Division Parks, Planning and Resources Department 3600 - 136th Place Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 -1400 (206) 296 -6602 January 13, 1993 City of Tukwila Planning Department 6300 South Center Tukwila, WA 98188 RECE.IVE.D JAN 15193 cows um-FY DEVELOPMENT RE: Environmental Review for Boeing Field Fire Station Addition, File No. C9202753 To Whom It May Concern: The King County Environmental Division is currently conducting an environmental review for the above referenced proposal pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). King County requests your organization's comments on the proposal. Enclosed is a copy of the environmental checklist and site plan. King County would like to complete the threshold determination for the proposal as soon as there is sufficient information to do so. Therefore, we would appreciate receiving comments by February 3, 1993. We will assume if no response to this request is received by this date, then your organization has no comment on the proposal. Agencies with jurisdiction will also have the opportunity to comment on this proposal after a threshold determination has been issued. If you need more time to prepare comments, or if you have any questions, please contact me at 296 -7148. Sincerely, DA ID �RADABAUGH Environmental Planner Enclosure City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director December 18, 1992 David Radabaugh, Environmental Planner King County Environmental Division Department of Parks, Planning and Resources 3600 136th Place SE Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 RE: Response to King County Airport Control Tower Expansion King County File #C9202405 Dear Mr. Radabaugh: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced proposal pursuant to the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA). No adverse impacts to the City of Tukwila are anticipated as a result of this proposal. Please note, if costs for this project exceeds $250,000 or 25% of the assessed value of the existing building, the proposal is subject to the City of Tukwila, Sidewalk Ordinance (TMC 11.64.021). As a mitigating measure the King County Airport is subject to paying their fare share of frontal improvements along East Marginal Way S. We are unable to calculate at this time the exact dollar amount of fare share costs without knowing the assessed value of the expansion project and the current assessed value of the existing building. For further information on this matter please contact Ron Cameron, City Engineer, at 433- 0179. Also, it appears that a discrepancy exists between the comments on page nine of the SEPA checklist which indicates no parking spaces will be removed as a result of the proposal and the submitted site plan which shows the elimination of four parking stalls. I would like a copy of the final mitigated determination of non - significance for this proposal sent to me. If you need additional information from our Department, please call Carol Proud at 431- 3661, who will gladly assist you. Sinc Rick, reeler, Director cc: Ron Cameron, City Engineer Carol Proud, Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 12/07/92 c9 2) "?-53 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: North Boeing Field Fire Station Addition (3 -840 Building) 2. Name of Applicant: The Boeing Company 1993 3. Address and phone number of the applicant and contact person: Larry Allen North Boeing Field Permit Coordinator P.O. Box 3707, MS 17 -MA Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 544 -1644, Fax: 655 -1839, Cellular: 949 -2565 John Crull (SEPA contact) Planning & Program Support Boeing Support Services P.O. Box 3707, MS 6Y -59 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 Phone: 393 -7299, Fax: 393 -1397 4. Date checklist prepared: December 4, 1992 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County, Building and Land Development Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): The project should be completed by mid 1993. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? There are no future expansion or addition plans at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A site environmental assessment and soils report has been prepared for the proposal by Groundwater Technology Inc. A copy of the report is attached. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY by your proposal? If yes, explain. No other applications are pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Construction Permit SEPA review FAA Notice of Construction, if required 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal involves a 2,800 square foot addition to the existing 11,200 square foot North Boeing Field Firc Station. The addition includes: 640 additional square feet of garage area; a 1,080 square foot dispatch office and an 1,080 square foot classroom. The additional floor area is necessary to serve existing fire station operations. No additional staff will be added to the facility as a result of the expansion project. The fire station facility is located on the paved Boeing flightline area, adjacent to the King County Airport runway. There is no pervious surface on the near the site. The proposed expansion will, therefore, not increase surface water runoff. No new parking spaces are proposed because the workforce in the building is not changing. Both parking and landscaping requirements have been reviewed with George McCallum for compliance with King County development requirements. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known, If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s), Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located on King County Airport property east of East Marginal Way South and west of the airport runway. The Fire Station is referred to by The Boeing Company as the 3 -840 Building. The attached map shows the building's location relative to the airport and other North Boeing Field facilities. A legal description is provided on the drawings submitted for this project. 2 a 4 1 • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle on .Flat oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Topographic relief of the site and surrounding area is flat, with an elevation of approximately 15 feet above mean sea level. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? There are no natural or artificial slopes greater than one percent on the site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Refer to the attached soils study for a description of the soils found on the site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Refer to the attached soils report. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to amount needed to install foundation footings for the addition. No filling is required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. No. The entire surface is paved, and the amount of paving to be removed to install foundation footings for the addition is so small that no erosion could occur. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 100% of the existing site is covered with impervious surfaces. 3 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. Erosion is controlled by impervious surface coverage and the existing storm water conveyance system. No other "earth" impacts are anticipated. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Fugitive dust and exhaust emissions are expected from construction activities in the short term. No long term impacts are anticipated. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any.: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 4 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Estimate the amount o fill and dredge material that would be placed in or remove ' from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area o the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of II material. None Will the proposal requi diversions? Give gener approximate quantities No e surface water withdrawals or 1 descriptions, purpose, and if known. 5) Does the proposal lie w thin a 100- year floodplain? If so, note location on the sit plan. No 6) Does the proposal invo materials to surface wa waste and anticipated No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be discharged to ground purpose, and approxi No ve any discharges of waste ers? If so, describe the type of olume of discharge. 2) Describe waste materi ground from septic tan example: Domestic se following chemicals...; general size of the syst number of houses to b number of animals or to serve. ithdrawn, or will water be ater? Give general description, ate quantities if known. 1 that will be discharged into the or others sources, if any (for ge; industrial, containing the gricultural; etc.). Describe the m, the number of such systems, the served (if applicable), or the umans the system(s) are expected No waste material will c. Water Runoff (including sto 1) Describe the source of method of collection a e discharged into the ground. m water): unoff (including storm water) and d disposal, if any (include EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff currently is collected in a series of catch basins and discharged via pipes to outfalls into the Duwamish River. The proposal will not increase the amount of storm water collected, or alter the existing conveyance system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials will enter ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, black cottonwood, willow, aspen, dogwood, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs: Himalayan blackberry, salmonberry grass: canary grass, orchard grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, skunk cabbage, soft, deadly nightshade water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation No vegation exists on the project site. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No vegetation will be altered or removed from the site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to 6 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbir fcffher: mallard mammals: deer, bear, elk, eaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The industrial nature of this site limits the likelihood of special status animals occurring on or near site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electrical, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric power will be used for lighting the new space. Natural gas will be used for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The facilities will be designed to be in compliance with the current 7 :Al.5:'7L' %;.ln.ruw.a:....: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Energy Code. In addition, the fire station is participating in the Green Lights program which will result in conversion to more energy efficient lighting. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing noise in the area is generated by ground traffic on East Marginal Way South and air traffic from King County Airport and Boeing Field. Neither of these noise sources affect fire station operations. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Typical construction noise would occur in the short term. No Long -term noise impacts are anticipated. 8 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is located in an industrial zone, and on a fully developed airport flightline. Adjacent properties are zoned for industrial use and developed with airport or aircraft manufacturing uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown c. Describe any structures on the site. The current fire station is a two story structure which houses fire trucks and equipment, and accessory office and classroom space. The existing first floor footprint is approximately 9,100 feet in size. The second story contains approximately 2,100 square feet of floor area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The King County zoning designation for the site is Heavy Manufacturing (M -H). The Seattle and Tukwila classifications for the this area are also "manufacturing/Industrial ". f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. The comprehensive plan designation of the site is Industrial. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable 9 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? J• There is currently a total of approximately 43 employees working at the fire station and divided over three work shifts. The number of people working at the site is not expected to change as a result of the proposed addition. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance will all applicable development regulations. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10 a • as.;ti, .n:� i.' gii:kiL:li:J{4,tv':a.n[a•r 10. Aesthetics EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The roof of proposed second story addition will be 30 feet high. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed building additions will produce minimal light and glare. Evening lighting may be installed at the building entry. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 11 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY A Boeing employee recreation center is located approximately one mile south of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to he on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No such places are known to be on or adjacent to the project site. The City Light Steam Power Plant located on North Boeing Field approximately one -half mile north of the site is designated as a City of Seattle Landmark. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No such places are known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by East Marginal Way South. 12 IT.F.'. ..s., wr....i.. c EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Bus and transit services are provided by Metro to the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Fire station employees park both inside the security fenced area immediately adjacent to the building, and in the large Boeing employee parking lots south of the security fence. There are approximately 2,300 parking spaces available for employee parking near the fire station. No parking spaces are being eliminated by the proposal. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Fire station operations and traffic will be virtually unchanged by the proposed addition. No new parking demand will be generated. No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. No road improvements are proposed or required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The fire station serves airport flightline and related uses. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. The proposed building addition is not anticipated to generate vehicle trips. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None I5. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services 13 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. There will be no increase in the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentlavailable t the sit 4 ectrici :f ura ga ater efuse servic system, other. sanitary seweptic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The proposed project will require the same utilities currently available to the site. The following utilities and purveyors will be required by the project: Electric Power Seattle City Light Natural Gas Washington Natural Gas Water Seattle Water Department Telephone Boeing Telephone Network Sanitary Sewer Metro C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. 14 ; King County Environmental Division Department of Parks, Planning and Resources 3600 - 136th Place Southeast Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 (206) 296.6602 November 30, 1992 RECEIVED DEC; - '1 1992 DEVELOPMENT. City of Tukwila Planning Department 6300 South Center Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Environmental Review for King County Airport Control Tower, King County File C9202405 To Whom It May Concern: The King County Environmental Division is currently conducting an environmental review for the above referenced proposal pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). King County requests your organization's comments on the proposal. Enclosed is a copy of the environmental checklist and site plan. King County would like to complete the threshold determination for the proposal as soon as there is sufficient information to do so. Therefore, we would appreciate receiving comments by December 21, 1992. We will assume if no response to this request is received by this date, then your organization has no comment on the proposal. Agencies with jurisdiction will also have the opportunity to comment on this proposal after a threshold determination has been issued. If you need more time to prepare comments, or if you have any questions, please contact me at 296 -7148. Sincerely, DAVID RADiABAUGH Environmental Planner Enclosure . King County Ieeutive • Tim Hill ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NOV 1.7 1992 Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known. or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write "do not know" or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning. shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems. the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit .this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.• 1` AD- DITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions. the references in the checklist to the words "project.' 'applicant." and 'property or site should be read as "proposal." 'proposer.' and "affected geographic area.' respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: + 4h-o I JT) we.,,. • 2. Name of applicant: 14'r`5 Co L.r,.„-hi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: eo6ox &a2'(5 5e4 1-JA- 9 8 0 43 (.z-o) 2-14-73 4. Date checklist prepared: /o.- 5. Agency requesting checklist: �• 1,45 A. 1-. Pe 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing..if applicable): 6.6-)A t 12- i2 5 -53 Bo Jeg t ,-- 5 1°R 57� 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansion. or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain. 114) (Cli.'197 -II RCW—, 401 (19113 Laws► SEPA Rules Part Eleben —l4 11'-960 8. List an environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, direct!) rc;•.ted to this proposal. . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. 4 4116-rmn 14-61"344 1.1 ..Give brief, complete description of your proposal. including the proposed ,uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page; (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) • t'12 -6o5F t ce a_Le 44 Zoo /►-t Lat. 5, 9.e e 4).4 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project. including a street address. if any. and section. township. and range.. if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area. provide the range or boundaries of the.site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan. vicinity map. and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency. you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. '-JA2 S 5a--2-1.- • 33 /o- cu,1t.:o 2z ry 5 . L)4 citzro /24.14. y r T:444.;i4 TU BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT! I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one)• other oiling. hilly. steep slopes: mountainous. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)'! 3, EVALUATION FOR AGENCY LSE ONLY 119113 Laawtl .. ICA. 197 -11 RCN' —I) 111 Part Eleven- 197 -I1 -960 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT SEPA Rules c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. clay. sand. gravel. peat, muck)'' If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. 5e, I-t 5• + d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. l e. Describe the purpose. type; and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. oyi,Q, y Pv1 • vich- f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use'' If so. generally describe. Y� ts,d- /thIPQ, h/ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? 5 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth. if any: t 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. dust. automobile. odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any. generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. - ►>'i 6,x�4.,,..�.Q A s b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so. generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: EVALUATION roR AGENCY LSE ONLY 3 1Ch. 197 -11 RCWW —, 421 11913 Lawtl SEP.. Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds. wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. a,- 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. tvo 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose. and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so. note location on the site • plan. Part Eleven -19' 1 -96(1 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water'' Give general description: purpose. and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic . tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial. containing the following chemicals . :agricultural: etc.). Describe the general site of the system. the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable)..or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. • EVALLATION FOR AGENCY LSE ONLY 4 119111 Law.' Itti,:���- 1(Rt"31• —t 431 Part 'Eleren- -I97 -I I -960 �. SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I ). Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal. if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so. describe. 54-0- w-isrc...- c-:04.6_Jej %s NA", e-vsio cri-a 144.4 etiNt �c..t.rrl,i 4 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY LSE ONLY 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. 0-‘7L Le-t- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground. and runoff water impacts. if any: f 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen. other oaks _ evergreen tree:• fir, cedar, pine. other , shrubs Z. grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage. other _ water plants: water lily. eelgrass. milfoil. other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? (e-nise-070■:-sy (5k4-N-17s) t;g1.. r 6-e r?-4-11-Weal c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping. use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk. heron. eagle. songbirds. other; , .s. ! `!'``.7A mammals: deer. bear. elk, beaver. other:, fish: bass. salmon, trout, herring. shellfish. other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. hd�t� 5 • ICI. 117-11 ItC -.—p 441 t 19113 Laws) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. I'vt5' d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil. wood stove. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will, be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. � I G-14 t'4) , hA.17. 4,� 5� b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. r c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: kntet erd,cAv ityb, Part Eleven-197-1 1 -960 EVALL'ATION FOR AGENCY LSE ONL1 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1') What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic; equipment. operation. other)? • a...44/... ,w 4', ** /'ti ..." ;ii .;Q l.J .'•. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or asiociated with the project.on a short —term or a long —term basis (for example: traffic, construction; operation, other) ?' Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. rn 864N a 6 119113 Law i 18.197 -11 RCN• —ta 451 .Par( Eleven-07-11-9W) SEPA Rules TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT . . • S. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noisc impacts. if any: pt EVALUATION FOR v. AGENCY USE ONLY 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use or the site and adjacent properties? C.411tArseCe "It)we-^ t:dLy / AiS s f- a al Lye-n-414 r'"') 4 M444+ b. Has the s-ie4gt, used for agriculture? If so. describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. • rvIdzi it.r)-w_d144, c-evu4Co I 10...4119-413 /4F)--L, LAt2 Lilysiv-i- 41.-ce4 d. Will an structures be demolished? If so. what? • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive* area? If so. specify. "VD- i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 3 •j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacu. if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and'projecied land uses and plans. if any: pfr-oda- 7 (h. 197-11 ItCW—p 461 (1983 Laws) SEPA Rules Part Eleten— I97 -11; -9611 TO BE COMPLETED Bl APPLICA \T EVALUATION FOR AGENCY LSE •ONLY 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid• die, or low- income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle, or low- income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? , d b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: 1 I. Light and Clare a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with, views? c. What existing off -site sources of Tight or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 4V"7 Ik I v>n t • b.• Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses ?_!f w, describe. 114143 Latb%) 197-11 471 • as 1 a... TO SE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: .13.. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national. state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? if so. generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological. scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: 14. Transportation a., Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. EVALUATIC• FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? II __ e d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets. not including driveways? If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). /1'6 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or air transporta- tion? If so. generally describe. 11') f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If 3felto/ known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. tn. to -tt ltcw -e rrl 9 11003 tarsi SEPA Rules TO 81 CONtPLCTtn 111 APPLICANT g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. 16. Utilities a. Cir ice .ailable at.th site: electricit septic system. of atural gas water Part Ele∎en- 197 =11 -%O E1'ALLATIO\ FOR ,, AGENCY USE ONLY b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. tie tunny providing the service; and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be neede / d . ^ I <AV� �a � e� s C. .d. l.Ja 41, fro C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is relyi g on them to make i'u cision. Signature: . L . S .mil Date Submitted: 10. -2P f 2-= 11983 Laws) 10 (C1 19.7711 RCM'. - 4 J King County International Airport Department of Public Works P.O. Box 80245 Seattle, Washington 98108 (206) 296 -7380 FAX (206) 296 -0190 October 20, 1992 Subject: Buildina Restriction Zone, Control Tower Site To Whom It May Concern: In as much a fire lane is required on the south side of the Control Tower site at 8200 East Marginal Way South, King County Airport hereby imposes a building set back of 20' from the southerly lease line for the Control Tower site. Thus a building restriction zone is established as described below. This restriction shall remain in effect until such time as the Control Tower buildings are removed from the site and the need for a fire line is eliminated. An irregular- shaped tract of land between the main runway on King County International Airport and East Marginal Way, in Section 33, Township 24° North, Range 4° East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a concrete monument designated as Monument "D" and having U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey coordinate values of x = 1,637,871.14, y = 195,531.46; thence South 72° 48' 11" West 229.73 feet to the intersection of a line parallel to 425 feet Southwesterly from the centerline of the aforementioned runway; thence North 53' 06' 55" West a distance of 42.59 feet to a point on the centerline of a chain -link fence; thence North 28° 42' 5" West along the centerline of the chain -link fence which is parallel to the centerline of Runway 13R/31L a distance of 1,179.27 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 62° 55' 3" West a distance of 210.26 feet to a point lying on the Easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; thence along said Easterly margin following a curve to the left with a radius of 2,928.00 feet, and a chord of 20.06 feet bearing North To Whom It May Concern October 20, 1992 Page Two 33' 35' 36" West, an arc distance of 20.06 feet, thence North 62' 55' 03" East a distance .of 211.21 feet to the centerline of the chain- link:fence; thence along said fence South 28' 42' 05" East a distance of 20 feet -to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; said tract of land contains an area'of 4,214 square feet. Sincerely yours, ING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT l B-+1 &A4/ (..e/ . v�%y`" 6- onald W. Smith Airport Manager 145 BUILDING RESTRICTION ZONE 1 • N N ARFF BUILDING (8190) U 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 31324 SF 0 Mx CONTROL TOWER (8200) PROPOSES ADDITION L= 145.74 EAST MARGINAL NAY S [Wax l'ercetaiii \PI AWNING \prIwIN?.DLrr KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PLACE' 8200 EAST MARGINAL WAY S TENANT' CONTROL TOWER SITE BUILDING RESTRICTION ZONE DATES 10 -16 -92 SCALE, 1' = 30' EXHIBIT' 'A'