Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L93-0058 - PAC-TECH ENGINEERING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
This record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below. L93 -0058 Pac -Tech Engineering 12677 East Marginal Way South RECORDS DIGITAL D- ) EXEMPTION LOG THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION Page # tode Exemption = 8rlef Explanatory DeSclriptiop �t�tutel ule The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress' intent that social security numbers are a private concern. As such, individuals' social security Personal Information — numbers are redacted to protect those Social Security Numbers individuals' privacy pursuant to 5 U.S.C. sec. 5 U.S.C. sec. DR1 Generally — 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure 552(a); RCW 552(a); RCW under section 42.56.070(1) of the Washington 42.56.070(1) 42.56.070(1) State Public Records Act, which exempts under the PRA records or information exempt or prohibited from disclosure under any other statute. Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit Personal Information — expiration dates, or bank or other financial RCW 6 DR2 Financial Information — account numbers, which are exempt from 42.56.230(5) RCW 42.56.230(4 5) disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.230(5), except when disclosure is expressly required by or governed by other law. l93-0058 12677 east marginal way south becker trucking cup DATE: December 28, 1995 TO: JOANNA SPENCER FROM: LIBBY HUDSON RE: BECKER TRUCKING, Conditional Use Permit #L940018 MEMORANDUM I have reviewed the parking lot for Becker Trucking and have found a number of problems in meeting the approved Conditional Use permit. I phoned David Kehle yesterday and went over these problems. He will need to resubmit plans to meet the Conditional Use requirements, so it may change the status of your review. I attached a copy of the memo I am faxing to David Kehle which reiterates the problems needing resolution in order to meet the conditions of the Conditional Use permit. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development December 22, 1995 Becker Trucking Edwin Becker 12677 East Marginal Way S Seattle, WA 98168 RE: L93 -0058 Dear Mr. Becker: This is to remind you that condition number ten on referenced conditional use permit prohibits on- street par East Marginal Way South and S. 128th Street. This means areas cannot be used for parking of trailers, company v employee vehicles. I received a complaint that parking on these streets we occuring. I inspected the site on December 11, 1995, there were 15 cars and 1 trailer parked on S. 128th be existing facility and new parking lot. You are hereby notified to eliminate all on- street parki inspect the site again in a week or two to determine if has been achieved. Failure to comply with this cond result in further enforcement activity. Don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions. My 431 -3663. Sincerely, `►1 • n i.merson Asso iate Planner cc: Public Works Code Enforcement Officer John W. Rants, Mayor teve Lancaster, Director the above ing along hat these hicles or e in fact and found ween your g. I will ompliance tion will number is 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 Fax (206) 431-3665 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director December 18, 1995 Linda S. Morris, Vice President Seattle First National Bank 225 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: L93 -0058 L94 -0018 Acc't No.: Dear Ms. Morris: The purpose of this letter is to authorize release of the Assignment of Account (enclosed) for the above referenced project. If you have any questions with this matter, feel free to call me at 431 -3663. cere (711.17 ,Jimerson Associate Planner enclosure cc: Becker Trucking File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 I'IMIt CJJ L., Ul • •a Ul-1 1 1 UhW1LN ULU/ rw G 1.3 1995 CITY OF TUKWILA ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNT I/We.hereby establish our ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNT in favor Of the City of Tukwila in the amount of $ 68,745.00 This Assignment of Account it issued in connection with construction of the project known as Becker Trucking Parking Lot orated at Marginal Way, Seattle, WA 98168 to guarantee installation of landgcapilag improvements, It is understood that the nature and extent of the improvements is defined by the epproved" plans and conditions contained in the City of Tukwila .File No, 194 -0018, L93 -0458 If, in the. sole determination of the Director of Community Development, the above = referenced improvements are not completed as' required by the approved plans, conditions and applicable* City standards at the above locat:,on, no later than March 1 68,745.00 this bank agrees to pay to the City of Tu i ate sum of $ upon receipt of written request by the City of Tukwila for RLbh'phyjent. This Assignment of Account shall not expire until released in writing by the City of Tukwila, which release shall.be provided upon request when the required improvements have been completed as provided above. ,,...�� Ma r r•}, 1 4' �_U A 5 BY: Date (to be signed by authorized repre- sentative of lending institution) Seattle First National Bank 111E Southcenter Bank Branch Becker Trucking, Inc. Account Depositor Account Depositor Linda S. Morris Name (Please Print) Vice President Title 225 Tukwila Parkway Address •' Tukwila, WA 98188 City, State, Zip : +• . MEMO Date: June 21, 1995 To: Joanna Spencer From: Libby Hudson RE: Becker Trucking Utility Permit, P93 -0102 Here are the copies of the approved landscape plan as you requested. This plan was approved January 25, 1995. The Assignment of Account, 150% Bond was received in our Office on March 13, 1995. That is the date that Becker met all the requirements of the Conditional Use Permit. Please attach the following conditions to the land altering permit: 1. Improvements must be completed six (6) months from the issuance of the Utility Permit. (Please note that the Conditional Use Permit, L94-0018, will expire if the work is not completed within the six month period.) 2. The hours of operation shall be limited from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. 3. on -site parking adjacent to the site and along the west side of East Marginal Way S. and along south side of S. 128th Street shall be prohibited. Whoever picks up this permit should be reminded that there is only a six month window for construction and installation of this parking lot AND landscaping. ALL the development must be completed within this time frame, or the approved conditional use permit is void. Please brief Ross Earnst that this permit is being issued. • June 9, 1995 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mr. Rolan Becker Becker Trucking PO Box 68426 Seattle, Washington 98168 -0426 RE: Becker Trucking Landscape Plan (CUP #L94 -0018) Dear Mr. Becker: I received your request to alter the landscape plan for the parking lot, but I cannot approve the change administratively. The landscape plan submitted at the public hearing as part of the conditional use application indicated that 10 foot tall evergreen trees would be planted. In addition, a review of the minutes for the hearing, reveals that the landscape architect testified that the evergreen screening trees would be planted at a minimum of 10 feet in height. Landscaping was a major concern at the public hearing. Any change from what was specifically discussed and approved at the public hearing by the Planning Commission needs to go back before the Planning Commission. If your wish to pursue this proposed change to the landscape plan, you will need to make the request in writing and it will be scheduled at the next available Planning Commission meeting. If I can be of assistance please let me know. Sincerely, wl■ Steve Lancaster, Director Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE May 18, 1995 Mr. Steve Lancaster Director of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd_ Tukwila, WA 98168 Re: Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit (CUP) #L94-00 8 Dear Mr. Lancaster RECEIVED 1995 COrvilvium ry DEVELOPMENT Enclosed are four priutS of a revised landscape plan for the parking lot. Upon review' of the original plan, our contractor and his subcontractor expressed concern that the size and placement of some of the plant material would not thrive and provide the intended impact. We had 'a meeting in late February with our landscape architect, contractor, landscape contractor, and Libby and Jack Pace from your office to discuss the landscaping. We all realize, that the landscaping is a sensitive issue and that any changes to the plans as reviewed by the planning commission would be difficult. The plans submitted herein reflect minor changes which we believe could be approved at an administrative level. The attached letter from Berg's Landscaping states the problem with installing large trees (Over 6 feet high). Transplantation is so stressfull that many do not survive and those that do will not become healthy and grow until the root mass has been re-established. A better installation results from planting smaller trees and providing an environment for growth. At two to five years the landscaping as shown on the revised plan would be larger and healthier. Item No. 6 of the CUP Conditions requires "a dense landscape buffer within five to ten years." In addition, we feel the immediate impact would be sufficient to provide the desired screening. A 3 to 4 foot berm plus 6 foot trees would visually screen a 6 foot fence. • Please review and let me know if you need anything else. This has been a long process and we're anxious to get started. Sincerely, Rolan Beeke,.. • P.O. Box 68426 • 12677 E. Marginal Way S. • Seattle, WA 98168-0426 206-246-9500 • 1-800-ASK-BECKER • Fax 206-246-9603 v. . May 16, 1995 c_. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Ms. Jackie Dempere 4033 S. 128th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit, #L94 -0018 • Dear Ms. Dempere: On March 14, 1994, the Tukwila City Council upheld the Planning Commissions decision to grant Becker Trucking a conditional use permit to construct a parking facility adjacent to their existing site. All required items of the approved conditional use permit were submitted before the one year expiration date. Conditions 1 through 7, of the conditional use permit, have been met (please see attached letter for conditions). Conditions 8, 9, and 10 will be included as conditions of the construction permit. Construction permits have yet to be issued, pending additional information and review required by the Department of Public Works. It is likely that the construction permits will be issued in the near future. Conditional use permits automatically expire after two years from the date of approval, unless substantial construction has taken place. However, in the case of Becker Trucking, a condition of approval requires that they complete the project within six months after the issuance of the utility permit. The approved conditional use permit for the parking area may continue as long as the use continues and all conditions are met. If the use is discontinued for more than one year, the use is considered to have ceased and the permit is revoked. The Planning Commission may modify or revoke a conditional use permit under certain situations as outlined in TMC 18.64.070, attached. If zoning of the property is subsequently changed so that the use is not permitted in the underlying zoning district, then the use may also continue as a pre- existing, nonconforming use. Again, if the use is discontinued for more than a year, the pre- existing status is lost. I hope this answers the questions you have regarding the Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely, Libby Hu on Associate Planner enclosures CC: Jack Pace Vernon Umetsu Joanna Spencer 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 w,.Pn:ier..{+ • DRAFT May 16, 1995 Ms. Jackie Dempere 4033 S. 128th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit, #L94 -0018 Dear Ms. Dempere: {�'war.U'3ii "1{rrcK :•rfY +� \•e•e�V �rv•:.:'.a•.rrvl•.{ On March 14, 1994, the Tukwila City Council upheld the Planning Commissions decision to grant Becker Trucking a conditional use permit to construct a parking facility adjacent to their existing site. All required items and conditions of the approved conditional use permit were submitted before the one year expiration date. Conditions 1 through 7, of the conditional use permit, have been met (please see attached letter for conditions). Conditions 8, 9, and 10 will be included as conditions of the construction permit. Construction permits have yet to be issued, pending additional information and review required by the Department of Public Works. It is likely that the construction permits will be issued in the near future. Becker Trucking will have six months to complete construction of the project. The approved conditional use permit for the parking area may continue as long as the use continues and all conditions are met. If the use is discontinued for more than one year, the use is considered to have ceased and the permit is revoked. The Planning Commission may modify or revoke a conditional use permit under certain conditions as outlined in TMC 18.64.070, attached. If zoning of the property is subsequently changed so that the use is not permitted in the overlaying zoning district, then the use may also continue as a pre - existing, nonconforming use. Again, if the use is discontinued for more than a year, the pre - existing status is lost. I hope this answers the questions you have regarding the Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely, Ubby Hudson Associate Planner CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 * REVISION SUEM TTAL * * DATE 1(— 9 PROJECT NAME ig �P.� / 7,-`c►G 6 fi..S ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON go ihtv ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER Q6 ,A ( PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER Poi U 115— 0071 TYPE OF REVISION: (....q(cd--Q-are I�((`-)``,L'l,� keA /IL . PHONE % ?9' (`7 ■ SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: RECEIVED -- - -- CITY OF TUKWILA - 1 MAY 1 1 1995 , �)U,, /MA) PERMIT CENTER 05/15/95 11:57 FAX 2067782196 SGA CORPORATION • Mr. •Robert Hart SGA Corporation .6414 204th Street SW, Suite 200 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Re: • BE(KERTRUCKING • ' TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Bob: This letter Is being sent as a follow up to. our discussion Tuesday regarding the transplanting success of small versus• large plants. It has been our experience that smaller landscape plants undergo Tess transplant shock than larger landscape plants. • The ratio of root mass to plant body is higher on • smaller plants thereby making it easier •for the roots to meet the needs of the plant.' The larger• the plant the •more.the grower• has forced It's top growth, normally at the expense of the root •system. As installers of plant material we want a good root system• but unfortunately consumers are often more concerned about the part of the plant that is above the ground.' In the case of trees, up 16 90% of the root mass may be ,lost when its. dug up for tranplantIng whereas smaller trees are containerized and have virtually no root loss during transplanting. The above ground portion of large plants grow slowly as the plant re- establishes lost roots while smaller plants take right off. As smaller plants catch up they are healthier and better looking than the, • :large plants. Please contact me with any further questions. • .0 002/002 • • •RECEIVE . MAR 31995 SGA CORPORAT March 2, 1998 Best Regards, Jeff SvIk Berg's Landscaping Post Office Box 1628, Woodinville, Washington 98072 (206)483 -0717 FAX.(206) 481 -2475 To ;. David... FAX 0: - •" J.(f) /. -. ...... City of Tukwila FROM: .4../ e 6c FAX #: PHONE #: DATE: 2 /`"/ / °151 PAGES INCLUDING v THIS PAGE: John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development DATE: February 9, 1995 TO: DAVID KEHLE FROM: UBBY HUDSON RE: BECKER TRUCKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) #L94 -0018 MEMORANDUM Rick Beeler, Director I have reviewed the revised landscape plan. The landscaping has not been altered from the plan submitted for the public hearings. As you may recall Condition #6 of the Conditional use permit requires that 'the landscape plan be modified to show more plantings along the west property line in order to achieve a dense landscape buffer within five to ten years.' Careful review of the landscape plan indicates that the plan needs to be altered slightly to meet Condition #6. The ten foot high evergreen trees will provide the screening height that the City Council is requiring. I met with Bob Hart last week regarding proposed changes to the approved landscape plan. This is the plan which was submitted to both the Planning Commission and the City Council during the hearing processes for the Conditional Use Permit and the appeal of the Conditional Use Permit. Any changes at this point must go back to the Planning Commission. I am still awaiting the Becker Trucking's landscape performance bond as discussed in my December 28, 1994 memo. Please be aware that bonding is required prior to issuance of the Utility Permit. If you have any questions regarding the project, please contact me at 431 -3673. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 FROM : BERG "S LANDSCAPING PHONE NO. : 483 0717 • • •Mr,. Ro r.1 Hart : SGA ;Corporation • • • ••8414 204th :Street SW, Suite 200 . Lynnwood, 'WA •96036 • . • • • •• .! t)) Bild,bnsed bn oasily traversable ground for Iandscapelequtprnent,. . 9) Bld valid 'tor 30 clays. .. , .• • '10). 'Bid based on June 1995 Installation. ' . •• .• . . • •••• • . • • 1'1) A', new irrigation system will be Installed per Berg's Landscaping specifications; s • • 12) •• •Asph'alt,•concrete, and baserook cutting andlor rernoval•not Included. • '. ' • • , • 1 3) Sleeving for irrigation: is included and based on Installation prior tb paving, . . • • 14) • ' Connecting /disConnebting' charges assoclated with irrigation meter • service not included :, • 15)' • Irrigation ,.meter not Included,;' minimum size 1.112 ". .• • • '16) , • Quick coupling valve and,manuat drain valve al point of connection only. • •• • 17) • An 'acceptable locatlon lot controiler:With power source and'concreie base by other's:. •18) ...Connection to •nd /o'r repair of existing, irrigation systems' not' Included: • • • 19) • Tree stakes shall be non•stairied at (1)'2 "x2 "x6' per everg, and' (4 :2 "x2"x6' per decid, "tree• , • ".'..23). , ...jute noting and "deep root" root growth' barriers not included: • ': • . • • . ' 21) •Maintenance not included;' ' • ' . ' • ' • 22) : Protection :and relocation' of existing plant materlsls'not included:' 23) • , Removal andlor priming...6f' existing vegetation' not :included.' • • • ' • 24) ' faockeriea, retaining walls, and /or boulders not , included: 25) W.S.S•T :, bonds, liquidated ,damages; and permits not'included• 26) ' 'Discounts• andlor retentiprts are : not incltded• . • :27) No addenda:have been'ackn'owledged for•this prgposal:' • ' • The fee for the ,above services ,will be as follows :, . • • • • • • 'Total Bid Package: • - ••25;700ti0d ' • . • , • • .. • • • 'Post Otflco Box )626, Wood. oodinville, Washington 98072 ' •(206) 483 -0717 FM (206) 481,2476, FROM : BERG"S LANDSCAPING .`. .' �. ``. PHONE NO; : 483 0717 . .... .. ' ^' ..' • ' . � '`. .. . .. • .. � ` .. . ^.. • • . �. wp .. . '. • '� ... `�. . $GA �� �Yh $ ^ Suite ` '' .WA mnnnA .... ....` ; . � .. ) ' •.• ..' .. • .. ... ' . • •. . .... � � . ' `. • 'Ih*' ' •a• the revised Plant liat far. the ^ ' proJwnt `....... .... • • . ` � • . .� . `... . . . . • ` . .. . . ` ' / ''' �� 'C�mm^ �nurm • $/B' ` '' .� ' . ' �,'- .' � .'' g4� • • ` 24/30" .20 . ' 'V�u�uvm Viburnum .2�/.3o" '.. ' . . .P�� 1����" ,' 1�8[i • � 4°.ppt' . . .'' :'` �7` hula plicataMesleln Red Cod4r.: . , 5) 5 ' • • ' . ' .'' . �W • ' • ' ��� ^~~ ^~° �~~~ ' � �un�' �'���� 2" / ' ' i` '� • '1Q '. '` Aoe r»��� -�.'- �Nmp� . . �� • '' ' . . • • . ..^ �/�' • .� . ' ' , '|nat*U :the. 001 materials am pmrlhe n|mn\Jit on oM�mY L� by Ly�n'W U�m Yorn:A Aiwn�uips.. . �D0:.$ 20�60K. ' • . .. ' . '.' ' ' � • . / .: . . / . .. . .. '. , • .. . .• ... . ...`• ..., . .' : ` • ' .. Mar. 13 1995 18:51AM P2 . `. . ` �����@ ��. .. . � .� . ` . ' -��y - ^ ' .`. ' ^ 1995 ''' • • ' Page, 8.9t 2 : .� .. . . �a>' •..; '' . _-- ' . ' ' /.. . . • • ,..• . � ` /~.,-_~..,....�_-., . � ^ • . .` �.. '. •• ' ./ ,� . . / • • ` . • ' ���|. ^ • .. ` . ... ^.. . . . `... ' ' .. : . •` . . clmn. Jo/ .. ' ' ' ' :�p ` • '' ' ' • ' �~w • ' �� ... . �. xndswap{hg • . . .... . . . .. . . '`. . . . .' .' ' ... •. .. ' .� .. . '..' .`. .. .` '. /`. . .. ,.... .` . ' . ` ...^. , .. ' ,� '. . '` .• .^ / • . . . .. • . � • '/. `.. '..` . • \• ... ..•. . . .... . . .. .. . .. .'/ . . .. . . . .. ' • ��x C��q�R�X��8 ' ` ' ' 'F8% (20,6) . . . . . - .' '. `.-�� ^� -_'._ ' � ._ • .. ^^.. .`. ... • .� ' MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 1995 TO: DAVID KEHLE FROM: LIBBY HUDSON RE: BECKER TRUCKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) #L94 -0018 I have reviewed the revised landscape plan and find it in compliance with the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit and regulations for the CM zoning district. I would like to clarify the one year expiration date. The CUP expires March 14, 1995, based on the City Council upholding the appeal, not the Planning Commission approval date in January. This should give you more time to address the items below. I would also like to reiterate the items needed to complete the review of the parking lot plans for Becker Trucking as discussed on the phone yesterday. The plans submitted deviate from what was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. These deviations must be corrected and the plans need to be resubmitted for review and approval. 1. The number of parking spaces is specified in condition number 3 of the CUP (see attached). Truck, trailer and tractor parking can be no greater than 17 spaces as specified, while employee parking is limited to 43 spaces. The recently submitted plans show 24 truck/trailer spaces. Please reduce these to 17. 2. The landscape area along the south and west property lines have been reduced to 17 feet in width from 22 feet as shown on the approved CUP landscape plan, Exhibit 6. Please revise the plans to reflect the 22 feet which was approved. 3. There was no landscape plan submitted with the permit application. Please submit a landscape plan which meet the requirement of the CUP, including condition 6. 4. The plans do not indicate where the lighting will be installed. Please submit a lighting plan in compliance with condition 1. of the CUP. 5. Please provide a fence detail which complies with condition 2. of the CUP. 6. Please submit an estimate of the installation costs of the landscaping and provide a bond of 150 %. This bond must be established prior to the issuance of the utility permit as specified in Condition 7 of the CUP. We have four options for completing the bonding requirement: a.) Becker Trucking may obtain a bond from a bonding company. b.) A check for the 150% may be provided to the City which will be held in an account until the landscaping is completed. The attached form 'Developer's Project Warranty Request' needs to be completed. c.) Becker Trucking may obtain a cash assignment or an assignment of funds from DATE CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, NA 98188 (206) 433 -1851 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 18 1995 PERMIT CENTER * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** PROJECT NAME P)F ( l I (i(£ . L!) q ADDRESS 1 fi p-11 4. Art CU(' P1 GU VU61 07AT h CONTACT PERSON WWI (L J h PHONE > -- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER b6:VL . f) U' , / r'(h t, - (r-I PERMIT NUMBER (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER L44- - D Of U- TYPE OF REVISION: Pa Lt bb t4 (Lila (I//44). COP. d can's (u rrr ( SHEET NUMBER(S) L-) 11� • "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date SUBMITTED TO: 1A,11I2j d gUYI, revisions. DATE CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1651 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 4 1995 PERMIT CENTER * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** PROJECT NAME 19 ow r +/L I J ADDRESS, I ? t011 �. A S+ m a gun (l h al L) SQ1AIIi CONTACT PERSON 1.)mic a h_ L PHONE .43' gqq 1 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER h l Le P ► f [�I C'1" PERMIT NUMBER (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK N JXBER �� - b o 1 �� TYPE OF REVISION: f'ff I.¢,101-21 � -etAiJ I K (O r(C-� �/L L) Al. SHEET NUMBER (S) I D-I' v)) Ckr • "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: 11.6b ti thA.015/01/L, DATE: TO: FROM: RE: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM John W. Rants, Mayor Rick Beeler, Director December 28, 1994 DAVID KEHLE LIBBY HUDSON BECKER TRUCKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) #L94 -0018 ). - 3 -0( °5Z I would like to clarify the one year expiration date. The CUP expires March 14, 1995, based on the City Council upholding the appeal, not the Planning Commission approval date in January. This should give you more time to address the items below. I would also like to reiterate the items needed to complete the review of the parking lot plans for Becker Trucking as discussed on the phone yesterday. The plans submitted deviate from what was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. These deviations must be corrected and the plans need to be resubmitted for review and approval. 1. The number of parking spaces is specified in condition number 3 of the CUP (see attached). Truck, trailer and tractor parking can be no greater than 17 spaces as specified, while employee parking is limited to 43 spaces. The recently submitted plans show 24 truck/trailer spaces. Please reduce these to 17. 2. The landscape area along the south and west property lines have been reduced to 17 feet in width from 22 feet as shown on the approved CUP landscape plan, Exhibit 6. Please revise the plans to reflect the 22 feet which was approved. 3. There was no landscape plan submitted with the permit application. Please submit a landscape plan which meet the requirement of the CUP, including condition 6. 4. The plans do not indicate where the lighting will be installed. Please submit a lighting plan in compliance with condition 1. of the CUP. 5. Please provide a fence detail which complies with condition 2. of the CUP. 6. Please submit an estimate of the installation costs of the landscaping and provide a bond of 150 %. This bond must be established prior to the issuance of the utility permit as specified in Condition 7 of the CUP. We have four options for completing the bonding requirement: a.) Becker Trucking may obtain a bond from a bonding company. b.) A check for the 150% may be provided to the City which will be held in an account until the landscaping is completed. The attached form 'Developer's Project Warranty Request` needs to be completed. c.) Becker Trucking may obtain a cash assignment or an assignment of funds from there bank for the amount required (see attached form). d.) Their bank may provide them with a letter of credit for the required amount (see attached form). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Becker Trucking - CUP 9. The hours of operation shall be limited from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Page 2 10. On- street parking, adjacent to the site and along the west side of East Marginal Way S. and along the south side of S. 128th St. shall be prohibited. Please be aware that a CUP automatically expires one year from final approval (by the City Council). Because Condition #6 requires installation of all improvements including landscaping within *six months from the date the Utility Permit is issued, optimal planting periods should be considered to best coordinate permits and the installation of landscaping. I have included a copy of the DRAFT City Council March 14, 1994 minutes (verbatim) for reference. Please notify me at once if you have any questions related to the conditions of this proposal as listed above. I can be reached at 431 -3663. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin Associate Planner Encl. cc: L93 -0058 File .,. kehle � Le. TA architect November 4, 1994 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 ATTN: Mr. Jack Pace RE: Becker Trucking Dear Jack, We are currently working on development plans area at Becker Truckings East Marginal Way Sou has a conditional use permit (L93- 0058/L94 -001 conditions are being reflected on those improv Presently the site is being surveyed with comp occurring by November 15. Subsequently, the d documents will be prepared with submission for December 15, 1994. Assuming 2 months for perm' and a 2 month construction sequence, the proje completed by April 15, 1994. At that time, Be be able to consolidate their operations to thi Should you have any questions or comments, ple call me or Roland Becker (246- 9500). Thank yo patience. Sincerely, David Kehle DK /ct cc: Roland Becker or the parking h site. That site and the ment drawings. etion of that task velopment permit to occur by t (February 15), t should be ker Trucking will site. se feel free to for your RE- NO" 0 7 1994 c DE _ r .__,vT (206)433 -8997 ❑ 12878 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH ❑ SEATT E, WASHINGTON 98168 RECEIV.'0 SEP 2 2 1994 By BECKER Mr. Pat Becker Becker Trucking P.O. Box 68426 Seattle, WA 98168 -0426 :ORPORXI'ION September 21, 1994 Re: Use of leased property, West Marginal Way, Tukwila, Washington. Dear Pat: I received a call from Mr. Darin Wilson with The City of Tukwila Code Enforcement Department. He stated that he received a complaint from the department of Community Development regarding the parking of containers and equipment on our property which is leased by your company. Darin has forwarded to me a copy of The Code #18.52.040- General landscape and screening requirements (see attached). He has asked that we contact The Department of Community Development at 431 -3670 to find out the specificity of these complaints. I would like you to respond back to me on or before October 1, 1994 as to what position you would like to proceed with regarding this matter. Sincerely, SABEY CORPORATION Ken Stickley Facilities Manager Enclosure: As stated cc: Darin Wilson CMT File i:nancys \wp kcns\becker.ltr TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE e 1 , , Cd`� �i� ln� ' 11,-SOM )�Qo SDU1 ,Cenk( Chapter 18.52. ( /L(P 6o'' 1- r� CI TV -i'uk- Excte '�F6vc.ervicnt-�r- Blvd • 18.52.030 Special tandsppe requirements. i"ui�ila (,�A The required landscape areas, as shown in Table 2, n $.jkp shall be increased by a minimum of 25% or 50% or by . construction of a decorative fence or solid planting screen, to be approved by the Planning Director, along the applicable front, side and/or rear property line(s) in the following circumstances: LANDSCAPE, RECREATION, R ECOMIINIM SOLID WASTE SPACE REDUI EM 2E2 9 t' 1994 Sections: 18.52,010 .Purpose. , By BE K R 18.52.020 .Landscaping requirements by tone �strtct. 18.52.030 Special landscape requirements. 18.52.040 General landscaping and screening requirements. 18.52.050 Landscape plan requirements. 18.52.060 Recreation space requirements. 1852.065 Lighting. 18.52.070 Recycling storage space for residential uses 1852.080 Recycling storage space for non-residential • uses. 18.52.090 Design of .collection points for garbage and recycling containers. . 18.52.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish mini- mum requirements for landscaping to promote safety, to provide screening between incompatible land uses, to mitigate the adverse effects of development on the environment, and to improve the visual environment for resident and nonresident able. . ' (Ord 1247 §!(part), 1982) 18.52.020 Landscaping requirements by zone district. In the various zone districts of the City, landscaping in the front, rear and side yards shall be provided as shown in Table 2. Minimum required front yard landscaped areas in the R•2, R•3, R -4, and RMH zones may have up to 20% of their required landscape area developed for pedestrian and transit facilities upon approval by the Board of Architectural Review. Table 2 - Required Landscape Areas Zone District oa4 /l4l / , 4 page .2 Front Yard Landscape (In Feet) Side Yard Landscape (In Feet) Rear Yard Landscape (In Feet) R•l None None None . R•2 15 -10 10 R -3 15 1 10 10 R•4 15 j 10 10 RMH 15. 10 10 P -O • 15 5 5 C•1 10 5 None . C -2 10 5 ' None C•P 15 • 15 15 C -M _ . 15 5 • None M -1 15 None . None M -2 15 None None M•2f.. 5 None None (Ord 1655 52, 1993; Ord. 1247 §!(part), 1982) , • • r r Post -it' Fax Note 7671 o oa4 /l4l / , 4 page .2 re ejaher; n e. Tor la.; F From t V 1.2..V 11 t ;s•rn..J ca/aept c ca. E . . ° when: (A) Commercial use district occurs adja- cent to a muldple -family use district, (3) Industrial use district occurs across the street from a single - family or multiple - family use dis- trict; (3) Installation of a solid planting screen within a ten -foot wide landscape strip with a height of five to eight feet or the construction of a decorative fence, to be approved by the Planning' Deparunent when (A) Commercial use district occurs adja- cent to a single - family use district, . (B) Industrial use district occurs adjacent to a single-family or multiple- family use district;. (4) Fifteen feet of landscaping shall be provided when a nonresidential development In a C -M indus- trial park district abuts residential uses. This landsc_p- Ing shall be outside of any fence used to prevent access to the development in a C -M industrial park' . (Ord 1655 52, 1993; Ord 1481 §2(1), 1988;,. Ord 1247 §1(partJ, 1982) 18.52.040 General landscace and screening requirements. (1) Landscape Architect Required. In the R -2, R -3, R -4 and RMH zones, a Washington State licensed landscape architect shall prepare and stamp the landscape plans in accordance with the standards herein. (2) Coverage Standards `YAi1�1 rrdscaped:areas (including shrub beds) shall achieve 90% live ground coverage in three years and all arF.45lno occu d by a building (including surface parking areas) -sh 'chieve 40% horizontal tree coverage in ten :years. (3) Visibility. The landIIcaping' -shall not ob= struct view from or into the driveway, sidewalk or street. (4) Outside Storage Areas. Outdoor storage E shall be screered from abutting public streets and from adjacent properties. Such screens shall be a minimum of eight feet high and not less than 60% of the height of the material stored. Said screens shall be specified on Uy /14/ the plot plan and approved by the Planning Director. Except in the R -2, R•3, R -4 and RMH zones, where outdoor storage shall be fully screened from all public roadways and adjacent parcels with a sight obscuring structure equal in height to the stored objects and with exterior landscaping. A top screen cover may be exempted if the item(s) has a finished top and an equivalent design quality is maintained. The screening . structure shall reflect building architecture as determined by the BAR to be appropriate. (5) Parking Area Perimeter. In the R -2, R•3, R. 4 and RMH zones, all parking areas shall have a perimeter landscape strip. This strip shall be a mini• mum of 2 feet wide and have an average 5 -foot width. (6) Interior landscaping for each distinctly separate parking area. In the R -2, R -3, R -4 and RMH zones, Landscaping within parking areas shall be provided as shown below: (a) For areas with up to 20 parking stalls, no interior landscaping is required. (b) For areas with 21 • 40 parking stalls, the required amount of interior landscape area is 7 square feet for each parking stall. • (c) For areas with more than 40 parking stalls per parking area, the required amount of interior Iandscape area is I2 square feet for each parking stall (see Multi-Family Design Guidelines, Site Planning Section, No. 31 for the normal 15 square feet to be provided). (d) Planting Standards: (i) interior planting areas to be distributed to break up expanses of paring (11) minimum size of interior parking lot planting islands is 100 square feet (iii) planters to be a minimum of 6 feet in any direction and generally the length of the adjacent parking space (iv) a landscaped area shall be placed at the end of each interior row in the parking area xrith no more than 10 stalls br 90. feet between tihe landscape areas (v) minimum of 1 evergreen or deci- duous'tree per planting area. (7) Automatic irrigation,. In the R -2, R -3, R•4 and RMH zones, all landscape areas shall be served by an automatic irrigation system. Moisture sensors such as in- ground sensors and rain check sensors shall be installed. (8) Utility Easements. Utility easements and other similar areas between property lines and curbing shall be landscaped and/or treated with dust and ero- sion control planting or surfacing such as evergreens, groundcover, shrubs, trees, sod or a combination of similar materials. In areas of overhead transmission lines; no shrubs or trees over 20 feet at maturity will be allowed. • [Ord 1655 §2, 1993; Ord. 1247 §)(parr), 1982) TITLE 18 — ZONING • 18.52.050 Landscape plan requirements. Detailed plans for Landscaping and screening shall be submitted with plans for building and site improvements. Included in the plans shall be type and location of plants and materials and the location of sprinkling systems. Installation of the landscaping and screening shall be completed prior to Issuance of the certificate of occupancy or within a reasonable period of time determined by the Planning Director and stated on the building permit (Orel 1247 §I(parr), 1482) 18.52.060 Recreation space requirements. In all R -2, R -3, R -4 and RMH zoning districts, any proposed multiple- family structure, complex or development shall provide on the premises and for the use of the occupants a minimum amount of recreatidn space according to the following provisions: (I) Required Area. . • (A) For each proposed dwelling unit in the multiple- family development, a minimum of 400 square feet of recreation space shall be provided. Any mulepte- family structure, complex or development shall provide a minimum of 1,000 square feet of total recreation space; (B) The front, side and rear yard setback areas required by the applicable zoning district shall not qualify as recreation space; • (2) Indoor or Covered Space. (A) No more than 50% of the required recreation space may be indoor or covered space; (3) The Board of Architectural Review may g ant a maximum of two square feet of recreation space for each one square foot of extensively improved indoor recreation space provided. Interior facility improvements would include a full range of weight machines, sauna, hot tub, large screen television' and the like. . (3) Uncovered Space. (A) A minimum of 50% of the total required recreation space shall be open or uncovered, up to 100% of the total requirement may be in open or uncovered recreation space; • ' (3) Recreation space shall not exceed a 4% slope in any direction unless it is determined that the proposed space design clearly facilitates and encourages the anticipated use as endorsed by the Director. (C) The 'Board of Architectural Review may grant a maximum credit of two square feet of recreation space for each one square foot of outdoor pool and surrounding deck area. ' (4) General Requirements. . • (A) Multiple- family complexes which provide dwelling units with two or more bedrooms shall provide adequate recreation space for children with at least one space for the 5- to- 12•year old. group. . Such space shall be at least 25% but not more than SO% of the total recreation space required under, subsection :. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Works Ross A. Eamst, P. E., Director July 20, 1994 Mr. Darren Pickering 14905 237th Place SE Issaquah, WA 98027 REC E , JUG_ 2. 1 1994 COMMut,, Y DEVELOPMENT Subject: Becker Trucking 12677 East Marginal Way South Utility Permit Application Return of Submittal Z1.3 O 5D ate Dear Mr. Pickering: I am returning your utility permit application and check in the amount of $70.00 which were submitted with regard to the above project. It appears that the intent of this permit application is to expedite the removal of underground fuel storage tanks. The plan submitted does not specifically indicate the locations of tank removals nor the physical dimensions of the tanks. The land altering quantity of 75 cubic yards is assumed to be the quantity of backfill material. The plan submitted addresses storm drainage design which is a separate issue and requires the submittal of a storm drainage analysis with calculations in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Aside from permits from the State Department of Ecology and Tukwila Public Works, the City Fire Department must also be contacted for appropriate permits. Please call me at the number below to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, ohn A. Pierog Development En eer JAP /jap Enclosures a/s cf: Denni Shefrin, Planning Division Development File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433 -0179 • Fax (206) 431-3665 City of Tulcwita. John W Rants, Mayor March 21, 1994 Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director Mr. Jeff Mann PAC TECH Engineering, Inc. 6100 Southcenter Blvd., #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: NOTICE OF DECISION for Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit - L93 -0058 As you are' aware, the decision of the Planning Commission which approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with conditions was appealed to the City Council. On March 14, 1994, the City Council upheld the decision of the Planning Commission and modified or added conditions. The conditions imposed on the CUP for the parking facility are listed below: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS s 1. That adequate lighting be provided within the parking lot perimeter. Lighting shall not go beyond the confines of the property. 2. That a 6 -foot high chain -link fence with barbed wire be placed inside landscaped areas around the site and that a gate be installed at the S. 128th Street entry (access is limited to S. 128th only). 3. That 43 parking spaces be provided for employee vehicles and 17 parking spaces.be provided for trucks, trailers and tractors. The parking arrangement shall not be restricted. 4. That curb stops be provided within the parking lot. 5. The transfer of materials between trucks /trailers parked on the subject property is prohibited. 6. That the landscape plan be modified to show more plantings along the west property line in order to achieve a dense landscape buffer within five to ten years. The landscape plan must be revised and submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to the issuance of Utility Permits. Landscaping must be installed in accordance with the revised landscape plan. An irrigation plan must also be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of Utility Permits. 7. That the performance bond of 150% for landscaping be paid prior to the issuance of the Utility Permit. 8. Improvements must be completed six (6) months from the issuance of the Utility Permit. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Becker Trucking - CUP Page 2 9. The hours of operation shall be limited from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. 10. On- street parking adjacent to the site and along the west side of East Marginal Way S. and along the south side of S. 128th St. shall be prohibited. • Please be aware that a CUP automatically expires one year from final approval (by the City Council). Because Condition #6 requires installation of all improvements including landscaping within six months from the date the Utility Permit is issued, optimal planting periods should be considered to best coordinate permits and the installation of landscaping. I have included a copy of the DRAFT City Council March 14, 1994 minutes (verbatim) for reference. Please notify me at once if you have any questions related to the conditions of this proposal as listed above. I can be reached at 431 -3663. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin Associate Planner Encl. cc: L93 -0058 File ., City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director February 8, 19933. 4 Mr. Jeff Mann PAC -TECH Engineering, Inc. 6100 Southcenter Blvd., #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: NOTICE OF DECISION for Becker Trucking Conditional Use Permit - L93 -0058 Dear Mr. Mann: Typically, a Notice of Decision is provided to the applicant soon after a land use action is taken by the City. This Notice has been delayed due to a pending moratorium to allow the comprehensive planning process to be completed. The moratorium would have affected the Becker Site. However, on February 7, 1994, the City Council repealed the moratorium. On November 18, 1993, the Tukwila Planning Commission heard a request for a Conditional Use Permit to enable a site adjacent (southeast corner of S. 128th St. and E. Marginal Way South) to the Becker Trucking facility to be improved and utilized as a truck terminal /parking lot for employee vehicles, trucks, tractors and trailers. The Planning Commission voted to approve the proposal with the following conditions: 1. That adequate lighting be provided within the parking lot perimeter. Lighting shall not go beyond the confines of the property; 2. That a 6 -foot high chain -link fence with barbed wire be placed inside landscaped areas around the site and that gates be installed at entries onto East Marginal Way South and S. 128th Street; 3. That landscaping be installed in accordance with the landscape plan received November 4, 1993 by the Department of Community Development and that an irrigation plan be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of Utility Permits. 4. That curb stops be provided within the parking lot; 5. That the performance bond of 150% for landscaping be paid prior to the issuance of the Utility Permit; 6. Improvements must be completed six (6) months from the issuance of the Utility Permit. The Planning Division returned to the Planning Commission on January 27, 1994 to request that the conditions of approval be clarified per modifications recommended by staff (see memo dated January 20, 1994 attached). The Planning Commission agreed to modify the above conditions (see the draft minutes of January 27 attached). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • As you are aware, an appeal to the Planning Commission's decision was filed with the City on November 29, 1993 (attached). Appeals to Planning Commission Decisions are heard by the City Council within 90 days from the date filed. An appeal hearing has been scheduled for February 28, 1994. No permit (utility permit) for this project can be issued until the City Council acts on the appeal. As we discussed on February 8, if you have any information you would like included in the City Council packet for the appeal hearing, materials should be received by the City no later than February 15 by noon. • Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions. I can be reached at 431 -3663. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin Associate Planner cc: Jack Pace, Senior Planner L93 -0058 file Attachments: Minutes, Nov. 18, 1993 (Amended 1- 27 -94) Memo dated Jan. 20, 1994 Draft Minutes dated Jan. 27, 1994 Notice of Appeal • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BEFORE THE COUNCIL, CITY OF TUKWILA IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) THE APPEAL OF JACKIE DEMPERE ) AND THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS ) OF THE DECISION OF THE ) DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT ) OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ) THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON A ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ) APPLICATION, ) )' Appellants. ) TO: THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL; Case No.L93 -0058 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND TO: RICK BEELER, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. • Pursuant to T.M.C. Section 18.90.020, 18.90.010 and Ord. No.1659 , appellant, Jackie Dempere and the undersigned citizens, hereby appeals the Analysis and Decision of the Director of the Department of Community Development and the Planning Commission Case No. L93- 0058. The decision consists of the issuance of a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Design Review approval by the Planning Commission, for the expansion of a truck terminal facility located at the Southwest corner of 128th Street and East Marginal Way South (directly south of Becker Trucking) Tukwila, Washington. 1. Appellant The name, address, and telephone number of appellant: ti Jackie L. iDempere 4033 S.128th Street Tukwila, •WA 98168 Phone:(206) 433 -8539 NOTICE OF APPEAL -1 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The appellant and the undersigned is comprised of property owners, tenants, business owners and people who work or use the vicinity of the proposed project. 2. Decision AnperZled. The Analysis and Decision of the Director of the Department of Community Development and Planning Commission involving Case No. L93 -0058 given on November 18,1993. 4 Applicant's Name: Pac -Tech Engineering • ..— t.. ewe i s • A,.—_ — Southwest corner of South 128th Street and East Marginal Way South Tukwila, WA. 98168 5. Figments of Decision Bung Appe ,aied A) The use of a issuance of a Determination of Non - Significance from 1989; E) The approval of a Conditional Use Permit, including Design Review; C) The failure to require and prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS); D) The inadequate disclosure and lack of disclosure of the adverse impacts associated with the proposal; E) The inadequate conditions and lack of conditions imposed upon the project to mitigate adverse impacts, including but not limited to: F) The limited scope of the traffic study and the misinterpretation of study as provided. G) The failure to enforce existing Tukwila's Tree Ordinance. H) The failure to protect city property. NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2 7. Objections to the Decision A) Failure to require the preparation of an EIS. The proposed project is a major expansion of a.truck and truck - trailer terminal facility that has already grown in intensity beyond its originally permitted use. The environmental impacts associated with the project are significant and adverse. B) The Department of Community Development has approved an. expansion of the truck and truck- trailer terminal facility beyond what was described in the application. C) The public notice required for this project was legally and historically insufficient. D) The conditions imposed upon the project are inadequate to address the significant adverse environmental impacts resulting from the project. The Director has failed to impose conditions which would mitigate adverse impacts of the project. E) The proposal, as conditioned, fails to satisfy the criteria for approval of conditional use. 8. Relief Requested Appellant respectfully requests that the Director's DCD decision and Determination of Non - Significance be reversed and that the applicant be required to prepare an EIS for a clearly defined proposal. Appellant further request that the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval be rescinded. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 29th day of November, 1993. and Undersigned. NOTICE OF APPEAL - 4 Jackie L. Dempere Appellant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1) Traffic impacts; 2) Air Quality and Wetland Habitat; 3) Excessive Noise and Light; 4) Hazardous Materials; • 5). Drainage ar_c. ;later quality; 6) Buffers, surrounding zoning and uses; 7) Performance History of Applicant; 8) Pedestrian Safety; 9) Children Security; 10) Tree Protection; 11) Cumulative impacts;. 12) Disregard for previous citizen imput; F) Lack of proper public notice regarding the proposal; G) Approval of a permit which authorizes the expansion of a conditional use beyond what was described and requested in the original application. H) Approval of a permit that aggravates, intensifies and expands another related site beyond it's original conditional use. 6 t..-11 .0 1 T •I .00 s•. • - are Affe ted by the Decision The appellant and the undersigned, live, work or use facilities in the vicinity of the project. The Director's approval of this major expansion of a conditional use, without adequate environmental review and mitigation, significantly and adversely affects appellants. NOTICE OF APPEAL -3. • • • To whom it may concern: '10'i 2 We, the undersigned, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to grant a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a parking lot to be used for semi-trucks, trailers and employee parking on the SW corner of South 128th Street and East Marginal Way South. We respectfully bring the following areas of concern to your attention: Traffic hazard involved in trucks exiting onto East Marginal Way S. from the subject property. Management of surface water emanating from the subject property. Safety of children attempting a shortcut through the subject property. H4mie a 14,1/01 'fx Addreaa /..<7 •--n • /) K9064Apv 6 ...6--f) 13.2g i7LOIL- a , L Jo . • a5-7.--. /4,/ r? /4„4„:4 , .35-fet z.- 1 9 2 9( e:/ pr 5;0 I 360-r L-70 (g 5. 13 oril_ LAMA L. Pkyo pe\`e r. Take all signatures to 4033 S.128th St.or call 433 8539 To whom it may concern: Nev 2 1p) r 7 c, We, the undersigned, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to grant a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a parking lot to be used for semi - trucks, trailers and employee parking on the SW corner of South 128th Street and East Marginal Way South. We respectfully bring the following areas of concern to your attention: Traffic hazard involved in trucks exiting onto East Marginal Way S. from the subject property. Management of surface water emanating from the subject property. Safety of children attempting a shortcut through the subject property. Name Address \ANVO C11 A //8 Ste. 7 // T�ef-afy1 7 °i6 e .4 f i ..ems � � {1.r h � ' � 464.71' C �✓ v rLV,I..n /3 s��a� - o -l�� .5 � Gr wit _ 9 6 513 � . c•2 -7 � ,u- n , 13 21-- /o • Mr. Haggerton- I'd like to go on record and say that my comfort level is about 1,000% better for this project now then it was the first time it came to us. Mr. Meryhew - Closed the public hearing at 8:43 p.m. MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO APPROVE L92 -0084- BLUE STAR MOTEL BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND WITH THE ADDITIONAL CONDITION THAT THE SIGNAGE BE BROUGHT BACK BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. L93- 0058 -The conditional use permit for Becker Trucking. Jack Pace- Before I give my presentation, we received a letter November 16 after the packet went out. At that time, you approved it with conditions. It was appealed to the City Council. The issues at the time of appeal were concerned with the use that would occur in the property, in fencing and the design issues. The applicant incorporated many of those conditions in the proposal. Some examples of the conditions that were proposed at the time were to limit hours of usage from 6 to 10 p.m. Our concern at the time was that this would be used for other things, i.e. storage loading docks. The applicant's proposal was that this is meant for employee parking or parking of trucks. The other concern at the time was traffic impact. Since then, a traffic study has been done. Public Works feels that this location of access is okay based upon the traffic study. The applicants also made improvements on landscaping. There was concern of erosion on the hillside. Landscaping was done to minimize this erosion. There seems to be a couple of key areas and concerns to the applicant and residents. The proposal you have before you, you can see by the cross section and your detail, the berming should minimize people corning in. Mr. Knudson- What was our recommendation before? We don't have what some of those conditions that were in your report. Mr. Pace - One is the conditions is access. The traffic study was a requirement, and has been done. The other condition was the storm drainage. That has been taken care of over the three years. The other condition was dealing with fencing. We were trying to look at ways to make this blend as much as possible into the residential neighborhood. The other issue is the concern with erosion of the hillside, which has been dealt with. This proposal specifically mentions that this is just for employee parking and truck operation -- basically a parking lot, and nothing more. Mr. Pace- In reviewing the criteria, there were a couple of areas that the staff was particularly concerned with. One of them dealt with the tradeoff - -is the berming sufficient, or should there be additional fencing? My understanding is that the applicant also has some comments on the fencing issues. Look at Page 7: the wording should be "..150% of landscaping cost shall be paid..of the utility cost ". "....the landscaping shall be installed no later than six months after issuance of the utility permit" -- I'd like to clarify that a little bit. Mr. Flesher- I have a question - -who is the landscape architect and who is he required by? Mr. Pace - The applicant. He's the one who prepared the landscape plan. M - Isn't that a bit unusual - for the City to specify an individual architect? Mr. Pace- We're just making sure that this application is inspected for compliance with the plan. The reason we're concerned with landscaping -- is that looking back at the appeal to the Council, there was concern as to the assurances to what would happen. We are trying to assure that whatever is approved has been met to the standards. In summary, staff is recommending approval. There are some areas we think should be addressed and would like to seek public comment. The particular issue is again, dealing with the fencing issue. We do not intend that this be viewed as a storage yard. Mr. Flesher- I just wondered if the surface material was gravel, or dirt... Mr. Pace- Asphalt. It's going to be a regular parking lot.. Jeff Mann- Pac Tech Engineering - 12720 Gateway Drive, Tukwila. I'm representing Becker Trucking and I also represented the project three years ago when it was initially approved. Mr. Becker, President of the Company, is also here tonight. The company itself is a significant company located in the City of Tukwila and has 35 tractors, 15 trailers, 10 Express Trucks, and runs about 90% of it's operation within 75 miles of its central headquarters here in Tukwila and a good part of Western Washington. The previous applicant on the project was Mr. Ed Becker, who has since retired from the company. As you're aware, the site was originally approved with conditions. Since then, the application was revoked, the site was then chained, and employees are now parking on the street. We do concur with the six -month condition again in putting all the bonds in place that would require us to move ahead on this project. Since the last time, some things have happened. We have prepared the traffic study, which has addressed the site distance issues on the site. We have also addressed the drainage issue on the site. There used to be a lot of flooding on 128th Street, and there was some problem with the drainage system. Becker Trucking System has taken measures to clean out that system and make sure its operation is functional so that it does not back up onto 128th. The site plan proposes 45 employee parking spaces, 17 truck parking spaces. About 4/10 of an acre of landscaping is provided -- about 26% of the site. Again, we have provided access to East Marginal Way, and in order to provide safety and operational benefits to the site. I wanted to address the issue of East Marginal Way. That comment in the staff report was directed to the fact that none of the trucks for this operation would come by way of 5 residential streets. All of our access to the site would be either North or South on East Marginal Way, and we would not use residential streets to access this site. There had been some concern because there had been some construction in the area, and some trucks had used the residential streets at that time. We're saying that we're going to get to this site from East Marginal Way, whether North or South. How we turn into it, we have a driveway on East Marginal Way and of course we can get into it on 128th. You'll notice the landscaping on the site, on two of the boundaries, 22.5' in width is fairly wide landscaping area. That's because of the zoning and relationship to the surrounding zoning districts and land uses. Those two boundaries require 15' plus 50% of that for a total of 22.5'. Again, the use is limited to employee parking, trucks, tractors, and trailers. The surrounding land use consists of Becker Trucking to the North, to the south is one single family home, and it is sandwiched between this property and some older commercial property and building further to the south. There has never been any concerns raised by that resident who lives in that home. To the East is an open space area, undeveloped. The other half of the site across from East Marginal Way, there are two homes. So really, there is only one home that abuts the site, and that is the one directly to the North. There are two directly to the East. To the West, is a vacant piece of property. The closest single family home to the West is about 300' away. Mr. Malina - On the two entrances off of 128th, why, in this drawing, does the one access have a niche out of it - -at the access point? Why does it curve in? Jeff Mann- The intent there is to have a full width commercial driveway. Mr. Malina- How many feet are between the other access point? Jeff Mann- It appears to be about 30' also. Again, because of the significant landscaping buffer, the parking is considerable into the site. The drive -in is 30' which is significantly wider than the normal parking lot that you'd find, which is roughly about 25'. Mr. Malina - The main entrance to this site on East Marginal Way -- How many feet are in there? Jeff Mann- It looks to me that it is about 25'. Mr. Malina - And that is wide enough for your tractor - trailer rigs? Jeff Mann- Yes. I expect that most of the activity in that driveway will be exiting activity rather than entering activity. Most of the entering activity will occur from the main terminal site to the North. Again, there is sufficient site distance on East Marginal Way so cars and trucks can enter that driveway. Mr. Malina- So you're saying that this is going to be the only use - the access off of East Marginal. 6 Jeff Mann- I don't think that is a correct statement. We're going to use all three driveways. Jeff Mann- (approaches the exhibit) We have the existing terminal to the North, we have this parking lot. What we're saying is that all access to this area is by East Marginal Way. We will always approach this site from here. The intent of the company is that trucks will not come in from 128th. Mr. Malina -What you're saying is that we know there could be an impact if we go into the neighborhood, so we're going to limit it to East Marginal Way, other than that short distance on 128th. Jeff - That's correct. Scott Clark- I have a question..Is there a concrete curb on the pavement? In the parking lot area to separate the landscaping from the asphalt? Jeff - I don't think there was an intent to put a curb on there. I think in the previous application there was a request to put wheel stops. This is not shown on here presently. An oil water separator in the vault is planned also -- required by the City. ? - You said those exits will be mostly exiting traffic. How do the trucks get there- - coming from the terminal at the North end of this lot? Jeff - They would go across the lot (shows him visually). Scott Clark - The parking spaces to the West side of the property - -those appear to be intended for trucks. Lacking a wheel stop or a curb of some sort - those truck usually have a great deal of overhang from the end of the wheel base to the end of the truck...I could envision those trucks backing up into trees. • cn Horn - My name is4.-en William Horn and I am a registered landscape architect and I've been on board to prepare a landscape planting plan. We have a plan that addresses the retention of the existing plant materials. This photo shows the existing Conifer tree mass that is existing. These are existing Pine and Cedar trees that are of pretty significant size - approximately 15 -18'. We are also intending to preserve this Juniper plant along the street. We are going to add new landscape plant materials throughout the perimeter. We're using Western Red Cedar and Cyprus..both are Evergreen plant materials. The estimated size of the tree will be 10' tall. The spacing between trees is 4'. We will also use Red Maple along the street, as a street tree. We're having Vine Maples placed along East Marginal for a seasonal variety. The other plant material is ground cover planting that is 50% ? Juniper and 50% English Ivy. One of our criteria was to use low -water plants that, in the long run, are extremely low maintenance, low water requirement, and low -care. Mr. Malina - Of the couple of trees that you're going to eliminate on the driveway on East Marginal Way, are they of any significant height? Len - It appears to be 12'. Mr. Knudson - Are you planning any irrigation on this? Len - The first 2 -3 years, all of these plants are going to be watered. We have designed no irrigation to date. As the years go on, the species will take very little, if any, water. The first couple of years, it could be someone simply holding a hose - -it's up to them how they would like to do it. The contractor may choose to do a design for the irrigation system also. Mr. Clark - Is there a risk to the existing trees by putting this berm in? Len - If you look very closely at the location of the berm, it barely cuts into the drip line of the trees. I don't think you're going to lose those trees. Mr. Mann - I wanted to highlight a couple of other matters. Presently, the current terminal site to the North, requires many trailer movements in order to handle their operations. One of the benefits that this additional parking will add to the terminal site, is to eliminate the amount of trailer movements. In order to load them, they have to move them around to get the correct position. We will see a reduction of activity in the night -time hours, as many of those trailers are parked on this site. Limiting the time of 6 am to 10 p.m. allows them to load trailers on the terminal site, move them over to the parking area and leave them there so they don't have to move them again until the next day. There was issue of fencing that was raised. We would like to have included in the proposal that we do put a fence on the interior of the landscaping and also provide gates to the site. It would be a chain -link fence. The fence on the outside would be difficult to see if someone has breached that fence. END OF TAPE 1, DATED 11 -18 =93 TAPE 2 Mr. Meryhew- Just as a question of curiosity, how will you water the plant life outside the fence? Len - Whatever is required by the City to make sure those trees survive. Whether we include an irrigation system to make that happen, I think it is going to be necessary. I'll have Mr. Becker respond to that. Mr. Mann- We're offering that fence for our own security so we thought if you could condition it to say "a security fence will be provided on the interior of the landscaping" and then Mr. Becker knows what he needs to have there in order to keep people out. Otherwise, we do concur with your staff report and recommendations, we do concur with the condition on there for the bonding and the six month time limit, we concur with the assessment of the compatibility of the comprehensive plan and with zoning, and we would ask for your approval based on those conditions with the Amendment to add the fencing condition on the site. Mr. Roland Becker - President of Becker Trucking, 12677 East Marginal Way South. We would like to put all of our empty trailers here. We're trying to eliminate movement of trailers. We would like to increase our efficiency as much as possible. What we have here, on the North side, is some heavy trees and a lot of parking. This turn here, is somewhat hazardous. For the record, Mr. Mann said we have 15 trailers, we have 50. We would like to put a fence up for safety. We would like to keep kids out of here from playing on the trailers. The fence on the inside would help us maintain security..we could monitor the fence to make sure there are no holes in the fence. Mr. Meryhew - How tall is the fence? Mr. Becker - It is a 6' fence with barbed -wire on top. The total height would probably then be 6 1/2'. If the vegetation does what it is supposed to, you probably won't even see the fence. As far as the irrigation, if it is an issue, then we would like to put it in. It doesn't make sense to spend that much money on trees and take a chance in losing them. Mr. Malina- Would you be opposed to a drip- system? Mr. Becker - No. Mr. Malina - Would you also be opposed to having a green colored chain link fence to help provide some better screening? It would better blend with the landscape. Mr. Becker - I don't know what the difference in cost will be. Len Horn - I just did a quick mental picture after he agreed to the fence as to what this scenario is going to look like from all four sides. The way it is going to appear - you are going to have a 4' berm and a 3' berm. The mass of the trees are going to compose the bottom 3', 4', 5' of the 10' to dig those in. You may not see this fence. Personal opinion, I don't think the extra expense of slats, is a necessary expense. Except for the gates, it's just not going to be a visible fence. Especially on the South and the West - no one lives there to see it anyway, and on the North side, they have their own facility looking at the fence. It appears to me that the only place that a fence would be visible would be the one access point off of East Marginal. Mr. Becker - We want to maximize efficiency and safety, and minimize traffic. The gate will be a key system. We will open it up at 6 a.m. and lock it at 10 p.m. Mr. Malina -What type of locks are on the gates? 9 Mr. Becker -Pad locks. Mr. Clark- How long has your company been in business? Mr. Becker - To make a long story short, my dad sold the corporation in August of 1984, and we got it back August of 1987. It started in 1925 and was originally in South Seattle. It came to Tukwila in 1974. Mr. Clark - I have a premonition that we're going to get some comments about truck traffic through neighborhoods. Mr. Becker - It's pretty tough to get around back here. The express vehicles come out on 128th. Mr. Clark- Is there a company policy stating they are forbidden from the residential areas? Mr. Becker - Yes. Mr. Meryhew - Called for a five - minute break. Curtis Robinson - I live at 13422 40th Avenue South. I've lived there since 1955 and seen this situation develop over the years. I think we have a prime example of how Industrial zoning creeps into residential neighborhood. Mr. Becker came into our residential community on a spot zone initially. He bought industrial land for his business. He bought some land with a lesser zoning and moved in a spot zone and thought it was business there. It's good for his own business, but not necessarily good for the community. Along the way, after his business had grown, he purchased some land of a lesser zoning South of his main truck yard and was okayed through the County. He was okayed to use it for parking of his employee vehicles. He almost immediately started parking his trucks on it and complaints did very little good to the County government. It seems that being successful, he found it expedient to extend his business by the same means. You people are the instrument of this subzoning. I don't know what should be done about this - but you should be aware that this is going on. If you approve this, you'll set up a situation where all the neighbors will look at what Mr. Becker did, and say "the trucks are making all the noise and the quality of life is deteriorated in the neighborhood, so why don't we do the same thing "? Nobody has brought up the fact that this document is not identical to the previous one. The matter of the entrance on East Marginal is different. There was no entrance on East Marginal, because it was approved in 1990. There's been no discussion of that tonight, although there was great discussion in 1990 with the Council because there was community concern about the trucks turning onto East Marginal. Also, Mr. Becker hasn't been operating just up until 10 p.m. in the past, and I see no reason to believe that he's going to in the future. Unless you put some condition on him that requires that he do this. 10 Mr. Pace -Our purpose tonight is to look at that new site. Those hours would be limited to 6 am to 10 p.m. if this is approved. Mr. Clark- Mr. Robinson, is it your recollection that there was strong public opposition to any kind of egress, ingress on East Marginal Way? Curtis Robinson - As I recall, there was a reason that the exit was not used. Perhaps there has been re- examination of that and some other reasoning. I don't think the public has been allowed to comment on that. It was significant in 1990. Mr. Meryhew - For my benefit, would you explain the difference to you for acccssing directly from the parking lot to East Marginal and accessing instead to 128th into the parking lot..what is the difference? Curtis Robinson - I just brought this up because there have been several studies from 1990 and I didn't hear any other people that will bring the matter up. It appears that truck entering and leaving East Marginal entrance will constitute a considerable threat to the traffic on East Marginal. It also occurred to me that trucks aren't supposed to be out to the left of there - -I wondered why we cut the corner on the other side - -why was it necessary to develop a corner on the direction where no trucks are going? Mr. Mann indicated at the time that it was required to have that link there. Curtis Robinson - It does seem to make it easier for trucks to turn in the direction that trucks aren't supposed to turn. I just mentioned that in passing. Nadine Morgan - 5190 S. 166th St., Tukwila. I'm building four new homes just South of the proposed site. Probably about 500' or so. They're directly West of the Community Center. Shortly after I started building my homes, my neighbor to the South and I engaged in an agreement to use the same road. I've been approached by two other investors in the area to develop other houses nearby, very close to the intersection of S. 130th and 40th Avenue S. I'm not saying I'm going to do that, but one of the reasons I'm building down there, is because it is a very nice single family neighborhood. It seems there is a lot of interest in the area in keeping it that way. I'm mostly concerned about what the previous speaker said. That what we're seeing is an expansion of a fairly noisy commercial facility toward the residential area. I don't have any comments on the parking lot development itself, except that it seems like they've done a better job than four years ago. My main comment has to do with the traffic that is going in and out of there. There's a lot of traffic that goes on East Marginal Way South, south from the facility towards Interurban. It creates a lot of noise. I've noticed a lot of pedestrian traffic down at the intersection of 130th & 40th Avenue South. There are a lot of school kids that use the old school grounds down at the current Community Center. I would like to see, if possible, the trucks using this facility, are routed more toward Seattle, to the North, rather than the South. 11 If I had anticipated commercial development to the area just a few hundred feet of where I am building, I certainly wouldn't have started building the homes. I would have anticipated what he said. I don't want more trucks going through that neighborhood. If they went more toward the bus barn, as most of the busses seem to do, I think that would mitigate some of the traffic you see coming from the Becker Trucking site. Mr. Meryhew - They would be doubling their time... Nadine Morgan - That may be true, but at least they're not going through as heavily on the residential area -- they're going through commercial area. Jim Wolbert - 12800 East Marginal Way in Tukwila. Mr. Becker answered my question regarding the safety of the kids of the neighborhood getting on and falling off the trailers they have parked over there. He answered my question by saying he was going to put a fence there. Mr. Meryhew - Where is your property in relation to this site? Jim Wolbert - Just East of the parking lot. Instead of two houses, there are five here. I would like to state that there should be a fence there, to protect the children. Mr. Haggerton - What about the noise situation as far as you're concerned? Jim Wolbert - Well, we've put up with it ever since they've been there, so there's really nothing we can do about it. Mr. Clark - Are you opposed to a barbed -wire on top of the fence? Jim Wolbert - No, I'm not -- anything to keep the kids out. Mr. Clark- How do you feel about the colored slating or something like that? Jim Wolbert - I think the trees are going to cover it. Brian Kennedy - 12802 37th Avenue S. I live about a half block West of Becker. We were fighting against this parking lot about ten years ago with King County Council. At that time, Becker said my house was insignificant. The cars park all along the side of the road, as well as the trucks. I can't believe it's going to be basically an employee parking lot. I just think having the parking lot on my side of the road, with all these trucks going back and forth, is going to make it worse. There should be some rules that they can't have any more trucks- -they have too many. The main concern is parking out on the road and their operation is really loud all night. 12 ? - I see cars parked on the side of the road could present traffic hazards. But the slanting of the gates or dock is not going to eliminate that. Mr. Meryhew - Mr. Kennedy, you may need to take this up with the City in another way to get further restrictions. I don't think we here in the Planning Commission can address that tonight. If it's truck traffic, then you are to contact the police department. There is a limit to the number of spaces, but it doesn't say that they can't park in the driveway as well. Brian Kennedy - So I have to call the police every time they park in the street? M - In the statement here, it says no parking signs will be posted. That doesn't say once you get back away from the intersection, they're going to have no parking. At least it doesn't tell me that. Brian Kennedy - Well I feel I'm living in a truck yard. Mr. Meryhew - I sympathize with you. To me, it appears to be, by opening up the parking lot and making it available to Becker Trucking, we will alleviate the problem that is there now on 128th. I hope Mr. Becker is listening quite well and he's got some relationships with the neighborhood that neeed improving. It sounds like he's willing to make those steps. I don't think we can do much about the traffic problem on the street, other than watch the existence of the plan by the City Public Works and Police department. If you don't get any satisfaction from talking to the Police department, call the Mayor. Jackie Dempere -4133 S. 128th, Tukwila. I was under the impression that the site was for sale. I called the leasing agent about six months ago because I'm interested in the neighborhood. Had I known this was happening, I would not have invested so much into my property. I'm losing money on my property. I don't think we should have to put up with the noise. This permit shouldn't be allowed until you have a 24 -hour study of the noise. There are no single family homes yet - but we want the people to come in and build. Mr. Meryhew - Are you saying that the truck traffic is going on your street now? Jackie - It has improved. I don't have sidewalks, and I'm on a hill. The trucks have crossed my street. Mr. Meryhew - They are using your street? Have you called the police department on this? Jackie - If I call the police department, I have to wait till they have time to make a report.. I was under the understanding that Becker was moving out. You are also going to have some lights. 13 Mr. Meryhew - We heard testimony earlier that the residents requested no lighting in the parking because of the night glare it would produce in the homes -- now you're saying that they should have these lights up? Jackie - I don't see how trucks are going to be backing up and moving in the dark. It's impractical. I think Becker is a growing company and should simply move to another site. This area would be good for low- income housing, or a clinic, etc. I'm sorry, but the quality of life for the neighborhood has depleted. I also have a concern regarding asphalt. Asphalt is very bad for the environment. When it gets hot, the oils go to the surface. The oils will then go into the drain and the river, untreated. If you have trucks coming in to East Marginal Way, those trucks are going to be using the opposite lane. If you are coming from the River and using Gateway on 35th -- before you go to the 4 - way stop, on 130th & E. Marginal Way - -if you want to turn to 42nd, you have to stop in the middle of the street to turn left. If you have a truck going 30 mph behind you, that's scary. There are kids coming from the school on 42nd and they are going to the community center and playground -- it's unsafe. Lillian Wolbert - 12800 East Marginal Way. We've lived in our home for 46 years and Becker is across the street from us. We have five homes on that side of the street that have to go out on East Marginal. With the trucks coming out against us, I don't think its a good idea. We have Metro busses that go by and park in front of our house and sometimes, in our driveway. I don't think we need the trucks to add to it. A person can tolerate it if the businesses are half -way decent. We've managed to do all right. But going out on East Marginal is not a good idea. We'd like to get out of our driveway once in a while. Mr. Meryhew - Do you think it would be better if they exited off of 128th onto East Marginal? Lillian - Yes. And the home that she's talking about, that she thinks Becker maybe has bought that property, that property has already been bought by the little company that is in business right there. It's already been sold. Mr. Meryhew - How do you feel about a light in the parking lot? Lillian - I think it would be a good idea. I don't think it would be a good idea to have that lot dark. Mr. Meryhew - How is the noise, as far as you're concerned? Lillian - It's noisy. I will say it's noisy. If we have company come and spend the night, it's miserable. 14 M - Jackie Dempere, some of the concerns you expressed, I'm very sensitive to. We don't have a City newspaper. We know that and it's been a problem for some time now. We did have a group that tried to start up a newspaper, but the type of City we have, we don't have a lot of residents, and it just didn't go over that well. We have a lot of transient people come in to work every day, but there are very few people that are permanent residents here. On behalf of the staff and City, they go overboard as far as what is required by law to inform people of public hearings. I don't know what else we can do other than go door to door. Mr. Pace - For some of those Planning Commission members involved in pre - annexation zoning, I think you recall some of the controversy we heard tonight went back to the history of what the County had. I.think we're still going to be dealing with those issues when you look at the Comp Plan update. This area, we did a little down - zoning. Under the County, they could do all of the activities we're describing here tonight outright without any public hearings. This area was much more restrictive than the County zone. I think the points brought up tonight, we will be dealing with in the Growth Management Act. If you look at the landscape plan, Item #20, it specifically says there will be an irrigation system. It seems to me that we have two issues that we need to decide upon. One is the lighting on the site, the second is the access off East Marginal. In the applicant's modification, the proposals dealt with the issue of fencing and type of fencing, barbed wire and gating issue. My recommendation is, you decide what you like, if you could summarize your revised conditions so there is a clear record both for staff, as well as the audience, what you're finally approving. Mr. Meryhew - Jack, would you remind us on the situation on the lighting from the previous hearing? Somewhere along the way, I heard the statement that the citizens didn't want the lighting. END OF 11- 18 -93, TAPE 2 (Continues from Tape 2) Mr. Meryhew - I have a question of Mr. Mann. How would you feel about some lighting on the parking lot? Do you want to address that? Jeff Mann - I think I'll have Mr. Becker address that, if I can. I would like to make a comment with regard to the driveway access. I think Jack covered the zoning issue very well. There is commercial zoning and light industrial zoning throughout this area. With regard to the driveway, the reason there was discussion at the City Council, was because the City engineer had precluded us from having that driveway. We kept asking for it all the way through the hearings, but it was denied. When we did the traffic -site distance studies, we have an existing intersection with 128th & East Marginal Way. In reality, site distance is not as good on 128th as it is on this driveway. There is better site distance for cars and trucks at this driveway than at the intersection. 15 Mr. Meryhew - What is blocking the site at 128th? Jeff Mann - The road goes down at that point and also curves as you go North. The proposal is that there be no cars parked going North on East Marginal Way. There is also some landscaping around the corner of the existing Becker site, that if it were removed, it would also help. I think he's willing to work with the City to remove some landscaping. The City Engineer still felt, based on the traffic study, that this driveway was safer than the intersection. Mr. Clark - Even with the landscaping and size of the trees? Jeff Mann - Even with, because when you go out on the driveway, you can see both ways. He felt like you wanted to promote some traffic going on that driveway to increase safety. Mr. Meryhew - Does the landscaping on the property to the North sit out closer to the street than it will to the parking area? Jeff Mann - It goes right up to the inside. The City controls that right -of -way and if they wanted that vegetation removed, they could ask to have it removed. We initially submitted a traffic study that eliminated the driveway. The City Engineer, after looking at the site distance, said he wanted that driveway back in to help the safety. ?- According to this chart, it looks like there is a couple of homes a little bit to the North of the driveway, one almost directly across from the driveway, and a couple the other way.. (tape becomes inaudible) Jeff Mann - The truck would still be going by the homes. As far as turning out of the driveway, the same number of trucks would be going by the driveway. ? -The other issue I wanted to cover was the CM zoning. This is considered the light industrial use. The CM zone are things like salvage and wrecking, operations, railroad tracks, outside storage materials to be manufactured, allows all types of manufacturing operations. We're talking about a parking lot. Again, it is for a truck terminal, but it is for a lighter industrial use. The items that have been in place, as far as landscaping- - we've done a good job - -we're trying to address the aesthetics and impacts of this operation. Lillian Wolbert - There are entire companies that are all down East Marginal to the North of Becker. They all come out on East Marginal, but they come out on one road. They don't have a separate approach, like they want. They do finc- -they have no problem coming out on one road - -like they have 128th. I can't see why they would have to have that out. It's been miserable because they have their cars parked there now on account of no parking--they don't have the lot. When they don't have anywhere to put 16 their trucks, they park them on East Marginal. It's not easy to come out of East Marginal and see where you're going, and what you're going into. I don't want them coming out on East Marginal. ? - It may help you, in the sense that, as they come out, they're in a better position to see what is coming or approaching. I hope that the City Engineer is looking at the total picture, and not just what is just best of the applicant. Mr. Becker - The issue was brought up that maybe we should move. At this point in time, we don't have the money to do that. We rent this from our father. He was in control, prior to 1987. So this is new to me. I've tried to do the best I can to get along with the neighbors. We're just trying to eliminate congestion and noise. Our equipment is there, noise and activity are higher than it should be. This lot is not a working area, it's just a parking lot. By law, we do not have to have back up signals on our trucks. Mr. Meryhew - What about the comment about trying to direct all your traffic to the North on East Marginal, as opposed to going South -- what's the possibility on that? Do most of your trucks go on the freeway, or do they go to the greater Tukwila area? Mr. Becker - City trucks will head North; Kent, Auburn, and Tacoma trucks will head South. Efficiency is pretty important to us. There's one gentleman that is not here right now - -that Swift brings freight into us. They have been told. When it was made aware that this was a problem, we contacted the Swift dispatcher and told them that they can't go on these back roads. What happens is the drivers get lost and they start looking around. Maps have been drawn out and distributed to the Swift dispatchers so they can forward it to their drivers. There are phone numbers available. In the neighborhood, if there is a problem, they can phone us, give the truck or tractor number, time and date- - then I can take care of it internally. Mr. Clark'- Were you surprised to hear some of the residents talking about some of your vehicles coming throughout the residential neighborhoods even though you had sent out notices? Mr. Becker - If it has been since 1987, yes. Prior to that time, people who purchased Becker Trucking had very bad track record. Right now, we have a very good DOT track record. We are the only local trucking company that is not union. But we still have a procedure that we go through - -we have drivers that are nominated and elected by the drivers -- they're used for any disciplinary action. If there is a problem, a ticket is written. We bring the employee in, present him/her with that ticket and discuss it and try to see what the problem is. If the driver accepts this ticket and signs it, then there are penalties. So many points lead eventually to suspension or even termination. This is not set up to terminate people -- it's set up to make people do things correct. If the driver still has a problem with that, he /she goes to his /her representative and they discuss it. If the representative agrees with the driver, then we have a "grievance ". At that point, two of the representatives and myself come in and hear the problem, make a determination and 17 vote on it. The system works very well. This is what would happen - -but we have to know about it. Mr. Clark- Why aren't the terms and conditions of the Conditional Use Permit issued in 1990 complied with? Mr. Becker - At the time, the facilities weren't right..there was still things I was worried about. I was looking at efficiency and looking at another sight- -but financially, it just didn't work. I didn't want to put the funds towards this property if we were going somewhere else. It wasn't a fault of my dad, it was a decision I made internally for financial reasons. If the issue was that we were getting bigger in 1979 - -we had 54 drivers at that point. My dad had a permit in place to extend the warehouse. That also involved the lot across the street. I wasn't involved in this - -it was an administrative from my dad. We had a strike in 1979, and when it was over, we had about 36 drivers. At this point in time, we have 30. Mr. Clark- What is your total workforce at that site right now? Mr. Becker - About 65, with 30 drivers. Mr. Clark- Have you changed your operation...are you bringing in more trucks from other companies..are they doing handling docks or something...is the volume down? Mr. Becker - The volume is down. We are an LTL carrier as listed in the truck load. What dictates our growth is our dock. We can't really grow any more than we have now. The Swift drivers are bringing in loads we used to bring in- -their trucks replaced ours. I was recently made aware of the dock plate situation at night. What they do, is when they get though moving a truck, they will move a hand truck under, move the plate over and throw it off into place of the truck. If that's still an issue, I'd like to know, but they were told not to do that anymore. They can set it in place - -they don't have to throw it in place. Mr. Meryhew - Mr. Kennedy is gone..but he did say that was still an issue. Mr. Becker - Okay, then he needs to call me. Mr. Meryhew - As a way to improve your neighborhood relationship, I suggest you need to call him. Mr. Becker - I can do that. Mr. Meryhew - His phone number is 243 -6639, the name is Brian Kennedy. Mr. Becker - Okay....parking was brought up as an issue from East Marginal Way there. We're placing NO PARKING signs. This may be good for us, but bad for the neighbors. 18 I expect my employees to park in the parking lot. I don't want to handicap the neighborhood if they want to use it for parking. Mr. Meryhew - If I read this right, where the City will get involved are the NO PARKING signs. It's further West of there - -I don't think the City is going to get involved because it's not a busy area. That's where the neighborhood is getting involved - -Brian Kennedy, again, is having those problems. Mr. Becker - Another issue was that we are lowering the standard of the neighborhood. That is not our goal. We try to keep our facility up as best as possible. I think this lot would help. We paint our building when it needs it, we weed around the area, we do have buffers on our trees. Mr. Meryhew - I would say that the landscaping and parking area right now needs considerable care. Mr. Becker - There was issue regarding asphalt versus gravel as being more hazardous to the environment. My intentions are to put in a oil/water separator. A oil/water separator does skim off the oil so it doesn't run off - and we have environmental rags that soak up the oil from the water. We have those on our present lot now and are maintained weekly. Regarding size of trucks - We have twelve medium footers and the rest are short boxes. We have three 53', but those are kept off -site. Regarding lighting of the parking lot - this is a parking lot, it's not a working area. I was under the impression that it was an issue with the neighbors as far as the lights coming in. There can be some lights provided that can just shine into the lot. That would be for our safety - -I don't see that as being a benefit to the neighborhood. If the lot was not fenced, I would want the lighting. Mr. Clark- Your gate closes at 10 p.m., so you're open from 6 am to 10 p.m. Mr. Becker - Yes. But if the fence was open, then the chance of kids or someone else getting into the lot- -that would be a concern to me. Without the fence, I would feel the lighting is important. With the fence, I think we have the security without the lighting. I would want the gates closed at 10 p.m. Mr. Clark- But right now, it's dark at 5 p.m. You have five hours of darkness. And especially if you have female employees in a dark parking lot- -isn't that a safety problem? Mr. Becker - Females don't park over there. We have designated parking for them right in front of the building. In fact, I've even given up my spot for them. Mr. Meryhew - Would you be opposed to low level lighting? Mr. Becker - No. I hadn't thought lighting was much of an issue, so I didn't give it much thought. Perhaps it could be directed into the lot rather than out on the street. On the other hand, maybe you'd like to use some of that light for the street. 19 • Mr. Meryhew - The whole purpose would be to provide safety for the lot. Mr. Clark - Maybe just a condition.. "lighting shall be provided so as to avoid off -site diffusion of light ". That gives them a good direction. Patrick Becker- I'd like to address the light issue. Along East Marginal Way, there are already City street lights. I believe when they're on in the nighttime and it is pitch dark, they're exceeding one half into the property anyway. So even if you have a fourteen foot fence, the lights are still thirty-five feet in the air and there will be lighting into the lot. If any lights, in my opinion, should be added, it would be lights half -way into the lot facing West (where it would be darkest). The other issue I have is, Mr. Kennedy mentioned traffic in the residential area. Classification of trucks: Class 8 trucks - 33,000 - 80,000 pounds; Class 7 trucks will go from 33,000 down to 26,000 pounds. None of those trucks have ever crossed that boundary into those residential areas. Mr. Kennedy is addressing the express division, which is a courier van. That has never been addressed to our employees on the Express -- telling them not to use that residential area. We could eliminate that immediately. I know there are NO class 7 or 8 trucks in that area. Mr. Meryhew - What do you have between the Class 7 and the Vans? Patrick Becker - We have Class 3, 4. Class 3 is a van. Class 4 is G -van: 16,000 pounds, gross weight limit and Class 4: up to 26,000 pounds. The 7 & 8 are the big maximum trucks of 80,000 pounds. Mr. Meryhew - I think it's great that you're supporting your organization, but maybe there are some guys that take a short cut through the residential neighborhood. You can't control each and every vehicle that comes out of there. I can't truly believe that all of the residents in that neighborhood haven't seen a lavender truck. There aren't too many lavender trucks that don't say "Becker" on them. I don't think the people would fabricate some of that. I'm not trying to get on your case, but to some degree, I think there may be some traffic that has gone through there, arbitrarily. Patrick Becker - That's correct, but it is traffic involving vehicles Class 5 and under. I do trucking operations in the morning and I know we have no allowance to give the drivers incentives to go to the West and go that direction. If I implemented a policy to the courier division telling them not to use those residential areas as well, you will absolutely be right. Mr. Kennedy mentioned a truck with an exhaust. We had one contract driver that worked for us in the courier division. He maintained his own equipment. I knew right away which piece of equipment that was. The last issue is the noise level. I wish I could have brought a video on sound of a Detroit diesel versus a Cummins. Our entire fleet is equipped with Cummins power. It is the most quiet diesel engine on the market today. We will always be running Cummins power. What is the noise problem? Is it the engine, is it the brakes, is it the dock plates? Mr. Meryhew - Mr. Kennedy isn't here to make a rebuttal. Maybe he's referring to the start -up..I don't know. 20 Mr. Mann - I would like to get back to the lighting issue. In our original application, it was never an issue with the Planning Commission...that's why we're not sure of our site plan. I think Mr. Becker has indicated that they do have sufficient lighting and was not a condition previously. I think the Beckers have received a good message about working with the neighborhood - -they are trying to be pro- active. Mr. Meryhew closed the public hearing at 12:00 Mr. Meryhew - They're going to have a fence, 6' chain link, barbed wire on the top, landscaping - irrigated, wheel stops before you get to the fence... Mr. Malina - I do have a concern regarding the trucks driving either North or South on East Marginal Way. I can understand the concerns of the residents of the community. Unfortunately, we have a small gathering from that area. I do see a future need - -we control the truck traffic in the residential neighborhood. I don't see it too far fetched, to control the traffic going North on Marginal versus South, turning toward the bus barn versus coming down through the residential. Mr. Haggerton - I don't see how you can do that though..how are you going to control all the buses, etc. Mr. Knudson -In trying to push everybody back to the North - -I see that as more of a traffic hazard and road jam. Their access is to get to the freeway. Mr. Haggerton- On the East Marginal entry way -- if the City Engineer says that's safer than 128th..128th is a City street..if that's not a safe place for entrance and exits on East Marginal, it should be made safe. It looks like that should be the logical way to approach it, instead of making a new entry /exit way. Mr. Meryhew - I have a hard time understanding why it makes a difference. I think the City engineer is the expert on this...if they say that the exit is better, then they must know what they're talking about. Mr. Meryhew - I have a problem with the lighting - -as far as safety of the employees and even car theft. Low level lighting could be provided that would provide light, while not infringing upon the neighborhood. Mr. Clark - I have a comment to the citizens who came - -I respect everybody's comments about the negative impact caused first by spot zoning then by commercial development in what was formally a residential neighborhood. The opinion of the Planning Commission is probably going to be that the net result of allowing the parking lot is a beneficial impact on the neighborhood to the extent that we can provide that impact. It is not in our jurisdiction to turn back the hands of time and tear down the Becker facility, nor to force Becker to move out. The parking lot appears to me to be the best alternative that is fair to Becker and beneficial to the neighborhood. 21 MR. FLESHER MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROJECT BASED UPON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. ADEQUATE LIGHTING BE PROVIDED IN THE PARKING PERIMETER, WITH NO LIGHTING BEYOND THE CONFINES OF THE PROPERTY. 2. PROVIDE SIX -FOOT, CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH GATES AND BARBED WIRE AS AGREED UPON. 3. PROVIDE LANDSCAPING ACCORDING TO THE PLAN WITH AN IRRIGATION PLAN. 4. PROVIDE CURB STOPS. 5. THE PERFORMANCE BOND SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE UTILITY PERMIT. 6. THEY HAVE SIX MONTHS FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT TO MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS. MR. CLARK SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5 -1, WITH MR. HAGGERTON VOTED "NO ". Mr. Haggerton- I'd like to clarify my "NO" vote by saying that this project is going to be a big improvement over the way it exists today, but I believe there are two or three items that need further study. Mr. Meryhew adjourned the meeting. 22 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 To Tukwila City Council RECEIVED NOV , 6 '6 93 IM:VELOPMENT RE: Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing Case Number L93 -0058 \\\hr3 I am writing this letter due to the fact that I did not receive the public hearing notice for Becker Trucking. I live at 4049 S. 128th, my neighbor to the west, at 4033 S. 128th, did receive a notice of the public hearing. 1 would like to have the 300 feet rule for Becker Trucking expanded to allow all community members affected (residents and those who use the community center) the opportunity to be informed and to voice their opinions. When community members do not receive notification of impending issues they are denied necessary information. The board is also affected since it may not hear opinions from all sides concerning this and other issues. Our neighborhood and the goals identified by the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee and Vision Tukwila meetings may be impacted by decisions made at these public hearing meetings. I feel that expanding the boundaries to include the entire community will allow us to all work together to meet the goals that we have identified as critical to Tukwila's survival as a community. Sin Irely, Terry an Chris Bitzi 4049 S. 128th Tukwila, WA 98168 . City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director HEARING DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: e COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: (EPIC - 24-89) RECOMMENDATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared November 10, 1993 November 18, 1993 L93 -0058 - Conditional Use PAC -TECH Engineering, Inc. To improve a vacant site as a parking lot for parking of employee vehicles, truck, tractor and trailer parking for Becker Trucking. The site is located at the southwest corner of 128th Street and East Marginal Way South (directly south of Becker Trucking). 1.5 Light Industrial C -M Industrial Park Determination of Nonsignificance issued November 3, 1989 Approval With Conditions Denni Shefrin, 431 -3663 A. Site Plan B. Landscape Plan 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Staff Report to the Planning Commission FINDINGS BACKGROUND Vicinity and Site Information L93 -0058: Becker Trucking Page 2 Project Description: The applicant proposes to pave a 1.5 acre parcel located on the southwest corner of S. 128th St. and East Marginal Way South, to create a parking facility for employee vehicles (43 spaces) and for storage of trucks, truck tractors and trailers (17 spaces). The intent of the parking facility is to allow Becker Trucking (located directly north of the site) to expand their truck terminal operation. The Tukwila Municipal Code, Section 18.38.040 requires a Conditional Use Permit for a truck terminal in the CM zone. The hours of operation would be from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.. Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Becker Trucking offices /operations Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Zoned CM Zoned C-1 and R -1 -7.2 Zoned C -1 Zoned R -1 -7.2 Site Conditions: The site rises gently from north to south with a maximum percent slope of 2% within the proposed paved area. The southwest corner of the site is steeply sloped and will not be disturbed as part of the proposal other than the addition of vegetation to help control erosion. Traffic /Circulation: Access driveways would be from three locations: two from S. 128th Street and one from East Marginal Way South. A sidewalk is also proposed along the S. 128th St. frontage. A traffic analysis was requested by the Department of Public Works to evaluate turning movements and sight distances. Based upon the traffic study provided by the applicant, the Public Works department concurs with the recommendations which includes restricting parking along S. 128th St. and East Marginal Way South. Vegetation/Landscaping: Evergreen trees and shrubs exist along the East Marginal Way frontage. The landscape provisions of the zoning code require a 15 -wide landscape buffer adjacent to E. Marginal Way South, 22.5 feet on the south and west sides and 5 feet on the north side. There are several existing conifer trees and shrubs along E. Marginal Wy. S., and along the south and west property lines. Staff Report to the Planning Commission L93 -0058: Becker Trucking Page 3 The project proposes a 3 -foot high landscaped berm along the E. Marginal Wy. frontage and a 4 -foot high ( + / -) landscape berm along a portion of the south property line. Because of the existing slope along the southwest portion of the property, trees would be planted on the property line to gain greater height. Existing trees along E. Marginal Way South will be retained. Additional trees (including deciduous) and shrubs will be added along all property lines to create a dense screen to adjacent properties (See Landscape Plan, Attachment B). Drainage: The final drainage design will provide treatment for oil/grease /fuel contaminants associated with vehicles prior to conveyance off -site and will be in compliance with the City's adopted Surface Water Comprehensive Plan policies. Fencing/Lighting: No fencing or lighting is proposed. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Design Review were both conditionally approved in 1990 for an identical parking facility on the same site. When this project was initially proposed in late 1989, the site was being used for parking purposes without an approved CUP. Design Review was required then because the site was being used with non - conforming landscaping. The CUP decision was appealed to the City Council by Becker Trucking because the applicant did not agree with some conditions of the permit. Conditions were then modified in April, 1990 by the City Council. Conditional Use Permits are typically valid for one year, however, the 1990 permit required compliance with all CUP conditions within six months (Oct. 2, 1990) of approval. The conditions however, were not complied with by the October deadline and the CUP was subsequently revoked. The site could no longer ge used for parking and the applicant was forced to park on S. 128th Street and East Marginal Way. Design Review is not required with this proposal because the site is currently vacant and there is no existing non - conforming condition. All future improvements will conform to current codes including landscaping. As indicated above, a Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for this project when proposed in 1989. Because the current proposal is identical to that proposed in 1989, no new environmental impacts are anticipated. Therefore, the SEPA Determination of Significance stands. .._ .._, . Staff Report to the L93 -0058: Becker Trucking Planning Commission Page 4 Below is the Conditional Use Permit Decision Criteria followed by applicant and staff responses: Decision Criteria A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. Applicant's Response: Operations on the site will primarily occur during normal business hours. The site will be heavily screened by landscaping on boundaries abutting residential areas. The site is adjacent to East Marginal Way which serves industrial traffic No lighting is proposed. Landscaping will mitigate potential detriment to surrounding properties. Staffs Response: The proposed business hours are from 6:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. The landscape plan shows how screening will be achieved to create a buffer to adjacent properties. B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. Applicant's Response: The site has provided 15 to 22.5 feet of landscaping as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. Trees will be planted at an initial 6 feet (1 foot over the minimum of five feet). Screening trees will be planted 4' on center which will provide a total site obscuring buffer. Staff's Response: See response to 'A' above. C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Applicant's Response: No buildings are proposed. The proposed use will be compatible with the existing industrial uses in the area and will use the same materials for ingress and egress. Staff Report to the L93 -0058: Becker Trucking Planning Commission Page 5 Staff's Response: Staff concurs. Also, pedestrian circulation will be improved with the new sidewalk along S. 128th St.. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Applicant's Response: Comprehensive Planning Efforts as part of the annexation designated this site for commercial /manufacturing uses. The site will proposed a low intensity use that is well buffered to provide compatibility and consistency with the land use policies. Staff's Response: The following elements contained in the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan: In the Residence Element, Objective 3, Policy 2 states: "Encourage the proper location and screening of unattractive but necessary use districts to protect residential areas from visual blight." In the Commerce/Industry Element, Objective 1, Policy 4 states: "Encourage the use of live landscaping in all developments." Policy 5 states: "Promote renovation of areas which are not aesthetically pleasing." E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. Applicant's Response: Screening of the site will mitigate potential aesthetic impact. The site will have a relatively low traffic generation and will only use East Marginal Way for access. Storm drainage will be provided to handle storm water from the parking area. There will be no on -site lighting. Staff Report to the L93 -0058: Becker Trucking Planning Commission Page 6 Staff's Response: Two additional access driveways are proposed onto S. 128th Street which is not mentioned above. CONCLUSIONS The conclusion is based upon the Conditional Use Decision Criteria: a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to Me public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. A parking facility is not considered an intensive land use, and therefore, the issue of compatibility has been addressed from a visual perspective. Efforts have therefore, been made to achieve substantial screening from adjacent properties. b. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. Many of the surrounding residences are elevated above the site with the exception of the residence to the south. A visual screen is deemed critical between the use and surrounding residential uses to best mitigate any potential negative visual impact. For this reason, landscape materials were selected based on their characteristics which include fast - growing, drought - tolerance and their ability to effectively screen. Vegetation can also be effective in suppressing some noise and absorption of pollutants from traffic along E. Marginal Wy. S. and from the parking facility. Landscaping will be effective in creating a visual buffer to the parking facility from the surrounding residences. The effectiveness of the screen is dependent upon the installation and maintenance of the plant materials. Plant materials were selected because minimal irrigation is needed after plants are establishment. The landscape architect should also be present during installation to monitor placement of plant materials. Because of the denseness of landscaping proposed on the site's periphery, it was felt that landscaping within the parking area would not be necessary. c. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of trgf c and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. No structure is proposed with this project. Staff Report to the L93 -0058: Becker Trucking Planning Commission Page 7 The new sidewalk proposed along S. 128th St. will improve pedestrian access from both the neighborhood and between the two Becker Trucking sites. Circulation of truck traffic would also be improved by removing parked vehicles along the • street to create a better sight distance for vehicles entering E. Marginal Way South from S. 128th Street. No Parking signs will be posted by the City to ensure the sight distance for vehicles is adequate. d. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The intent of the CM (Industrial Park) zone designation is to allow uses which are non - nuisance oriented and which don't produce excessive noise, pollution or odor. The Conditional Use Permit process offers opportunity to assure that restrictive performance standards are imposed on specific uses to minimize perceived incompatible land uses. Extensive landscaping as proposed meet each of the policies identified above. Further, while lighting is typically installed within parking areas, it is felt that lighting may negatively impact nearby residences, and is therefore not required. A parking facility is an appropriate use within the CM zone provided adequate measures are taken to ensure the use is generally compatible with the surrounding land uses. By requiring dense landscape buffers, any negative visual impact will be significantly reduced. RECOMMENDATIONS The Department of Community Development recommends the Conditional Use Permit be approved with the following condition: A performance bond for 150% of cost of landscaping to be installed within 6 months of approval shall be required. Lynn William Horn and Associates (Landscape Architect) shall be retained to monitor and approve the placement of landscape materials during installation. TO: FROM: DATE: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development M E M O R A N D U M Lynn Horn Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner November 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Becker Trucking - Landscape Plan Rick Beeler, Director Based upon our phone conversation today, I recommend the following changes be made to the landscape plan in order to achieve maximum screening: 1. Include deciduous plantings along East Marginal Way provide a mixture of deciduous and evergreen. Vine recommended and can either replace the existing groundcover, or be planted within the same area. 2. Because of the existing slope along the southwest line, trees should be planted on the property line greater height. South to Maple is juniper property to gain. 3. The proposed berm should continue from the east side along the south property line and terminate where the south property line jogs approximately 20 feet south. Plantings should be at the top of the berm. The purpose of extending the berm serves to provide better screening to the residence to the south. 4. Possible conditions of approval may include: a. dead or dying trees shall be replaced after one year. Replacement shall be at a 1:1 ratio. b. Placement of landscape materials shall be approved by landscape architect on site during installation. 5. The revised landscape plan shall include the E. Marginal Way South driveway. 6. The plant list shall include spacing of plant materials. 7. Cross - sections should be prepared�ab least two berm locations, specifically adjacent to E. Marginal Way South and adjacent to the residence located to the south. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 PMT's are required for the site plan and landscape plan. Revisions and PMT's should be provided by November 9, by noon. cc: Jeff Mann, PAC -TECH Engineering To: From: Date: Subject: Denni Shefrin, Planning John A. Pierog, PW Development Engineer November 5, 1993 Becker Trucking (Parking Lot) 12677 East Marginal Way South Conditional Use Application Activity No. L93 -0058 Traffic Study .. RECEIVED NOV 1993 COIVIMUNITY DFVELOPMEN T Public Works has reviewed the subject study in accordance with your November 4th request. We are in agreement with the recommendations for on- street parking restrictions along East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street. We also agree that entering and stopping sight distances for the proposed East Marginal Way South driveway are not up to AASHTO standards. However, these distances would be closer to standards than those for the existing East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street intersection. That being the case, entrances and exits from the proposed driveway onto or off East Marginal Way South would actually present a safer situation. No restrictions on turning movements are necessary. Subsequent telephone conversations with the traffic consultant indicated agreement on this point. Formal agreement documentation will be forthcoming. Additional on- street parking restrictions will be necessary south of the East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street intersection. If you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know. JAP /jap cf: City Engineer Development File wv, u7 viDO, 41 .52.02, 0,0 7Axe PAC-TECH Engineering, Inc. f _ 411.41■-■ Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists 1 Mr. Ron Cameron City Engineer City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Reference: Becker Transfer Traffic Study Mr. Cameron, OG/I /!i S4G74Y'/i R ECEIVEDovember 5, 1993 NOV - 8 1993 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS �St {t% yl r Novi t D EV EEO P s' After discussing traffic patterns and growth in the vicinity of the proposed Becker Transfer parking lot we feel a modification of the initial recommendations presented in our traffic study is appropriate. It is recommended that the proposed driveway access on East Marginal Way South be developed. This recommendation is based upon the following: 1. The intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street is a geometrically complex intersection. As indicated in the traffic study this intersection is inadequate for both entering sight distance and stopping sight distance according to current AASHTO standards. 2. The entering sight distance and stopping sight distance for the proposed driveway access on East Marginal Way South are also less than the full distances recommended by current AASHTO standards. However, the sight distance conditions for the proposed driveway do provide for a larger margin of safety than the conditions at the southern intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street. 3. Most of the vehicular traffic accessing the proposed parking lot will be traveling north (approximately 82 %) on East Marginal Way South. By allowing access to the parking lot directly from East Marginal Way South both passenger vehicles and trucks can avoid the intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street, and thereby utilize safer sight distance conditions. Environmental Services: 3640 South Cedar, Suite A • Tacoma, WA 98409 -5700 • (206) 473 -4491 • FAX (206) 474 -3695 Pierce County: (206) 473 -4491 • King County: (206) 243 -7112 r4 Kitsap County: (206) 377 -2053 There is the possibility of increased traffic volumes at the intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street. Because of the complex geometry of this intersection, and in order to promote a safer environment, it is desirable to limit the number of turning vehicles at this intersection. The installation of the driveway access on East Marginal Way South will help to accomplish this. With the development of the proposed driveway access on East Marginal Way South on- street parking will_need to be restricted on the west side of the street, between the proposed driveway _locatiort_and_.the,southern� intersection of East Marginal Way South and So`u fr • 12F—I1171-Street. If there are any questions please contact either Heather Bornhorst or myself at (206) 473 -4491. Sincerely, ,19 James A. Mitchell, P.E. Transportation Manager PAC'' ■ ECH Engineering, Inc. ���./ Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists Mr. Denni Shefrin Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Reference: Becker Transfer Traffic Study Dear Mr. Shefrin, November 4, 1993 Enclosed is the completed traffic study as requested as part of the Design Review Conditions (File 89- 10 -DR) and Conditional Use Permit Conditions (File 89 -3 -CUP). If you have any questions please feel free to contact Heather Bornhorst or myself at (206) 473 -4491. Sincerely, 'Ale/ James A. Mitchell, P.E. Transportation Manager RECEIVED NOV - 4 la COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Environmental Services: 3640 South Cedar, Suite A • Tacoma, WA 98409 -5700 • (206) 473 -4491 • FAX (206) 474 -3695 Pierce County: (206) 473 -4491 • King County: (206) 243 -7112 • Kitsap County: (206) 377 -2053 � BECKER TRANSFER TRAFFIC STUDY Prepared For: Prepared By: Pat Becker James A. Mitchell, P.E. Heather Ann Bornhorst Becker Transfer PO Box 68426 Seattle, WA 98188 PAC -TECH Engineering, Inc. 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 212 Seattle, WA 98168 (206) 243 -7112 File# 50322 November 4, 1993 RECEIVED NOV - 4 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BECKER TRANSFER TRAFFIC STUDY I. INTRODUCTION This traffic study was initiated as the result of a City of Tukwila Department of Community Development letter. This letter from Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner, to Jeff Mann, P.E., indicated that this study should be provided in order to evaluate the safety of both the existing and proposed intersections on East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street. Becker Transfer proposes a parking lot located on the southwest corner of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street intersection as shown in Figure 1. The proposed parking lot is approximately 1.5 acres in size and will have 43 vehicular parking stalls, and 17 truck trailer parking stalls. The proposed parking lot will have two access points on South 128th Street, and one access point on East Marginal Way South. The purpose of this proposed development is to provide parking for the Becker employees and to provide a storage facility for truck trailers. II. EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM CONDITIONS A. Roadway System Description: The proposed development has three access points; one located on East Marginal Way South and two located on South 128th Street. East Marginal Way South is a minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. It is an asphalt surface two lane roadway that has a traveled width of 36 feet. Currently on- street parking is allowed along the west side of the roadway, and along the east side to the south of the South 128th Street intersection. South 128th Street is a local roadway with a speed limit of 25 mph. It is an asphalt surface two lane roadway that has a traveled width of 36 feet towards the East Marginal Way South intersection, and a traveled width of 24 feet towards the 37th Avenue South intersection. Currently on- street parking is allowed along both sides of South 128th Street. The intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street is an offset intersection. Both directions of South 128th Street are stop controlled. There is an existing painted and signed crosswalk across East Marginal Way South between the intersecting legs of South 128th Street. 1 B. Traffic Volumes: Average daily traffic volumes for the years 1991 and 1992 were provided by the City of Tukwila Department of Public Works. Tficse.volumes were then projected, assuming an annual traffic growth rate of three percent((3% in order to obtain 1993 average daily traffic volumes. These projected volumes are shown in Figure 2. III. SAFETY CONCERNS A. Sight Distances: Both the entering sight distance and stopping sight distance were measured for each of the three proposed driveway accesses and for the southern intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street. The sight distance measurements were performed assuming that parking would be restricted within the sight triangles. The field measured sight distances are given in the following tables. TABLE 1 - Entering Sight Distances (ESD) INTERSECTION LOCATION DIRECTION FACING EXISTING ESD (FEET) East Marginal Way South and South 128th North 178 Street (Southern Intersection) South 203 Proposed Driveway Access onto East Marginal North 220 Way South South 395 Eastern Proposed Driveway Access onto South East 148 1 128th Street West 605 2 Western Proposed Driveway Access onto South East 252 1 128th Street West 502 2 easure s • istance to intersection wit . st ` argina "ay Measured distance to 'T' intersection with 37th Avenue South. out • • TABLE 2 - Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) INTERSECTION LOCATION DIRECTION TRAVELING EXISTING SSD (FEET) East Marginal Way South and South 128th South 185 Street (Southern Intersection) North 210 Proposed Driveway Access onto East Marginal South 230 Way South North 395 Eastern Proposed Driveway Access onto South West 148 1 128th Street East 605 2 Western Proposed Driveway Access onto South West 252 ' 128th Street East 502 2 t Measured distance to ' "1" intersection with East Marginal Way South. 2 Measured distance to 'T' intersection with 37th Avenue South. The entering sight distance measurements were made at a point on the intersecting roadway, located 10 feet back from the edge of the traveled way of the through roadway, considering an entering vehicle eye height of 3.5 feet and an approaching vehicle eye height of 4.25 feet. The stopping sight distance measurements were made at a point on the through roadway, located perpendicular to the centerline of the intersecting roadway in the center of the traveled lane, considering an approaching vehicle eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 0.5 feet. The required sight distances were determined according to AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. The entering sight distance calculations were performed for both passenger vehicles and : large semitrailer: combination trucks. The calculations are in the appendix of this report and a summary of the results are shown in the following tables. -3 TABLE 3 - Required Entering Sight Distances on East Marginal Way South INTERSECTION MANEUVER DIRECTION FACING PASSENGER VEHICLES COMBINATION TRUCKS r Case IIIA - Crossing Maneuver North South _ N/A ' N/A N/A N/A Case IIIB - Turning Left North South 329 feet 284 feet 607 feet 576 feet Case IIIC - Turning Right North South 329 feet N/A 607 feet N/A oadway conditions do not permit crossing maneuvers. TABLE 4 - Required Entering Sight Distances on South 128th Street INTERSECTION MANEUVER DIRECTION FACING PASSENGER VEHICLES COMBINATION TRUCKS Case IIIA - Crossing Maneuver East West N/A 1 N/A 478 feet 478 feet Case IIIB - Turning Left East West 284 feet 235 feet 576 feet 434 feet Case IIIC - Turning Right • East West N/A 235 feet N/A 434 feet rossing maneuvers were considered for trucks only due to the driveway alignments across South 128th Street. The required stopping sight distances were determined from the roadway's design speed and are shown in the following table. TABLE 5 - Required Stopping Sight Distances ROADWAY DESIGN SPEED (MPH) REQUIRED SSD (FEET) East Marginal Way South 35 250 South 128th Street 25 150 4 The southern intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street, and the proposed driveway on East Marginal Way South do not meet the required entering sight distances for either passenger vehicle or combination trucks. The intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street has insufficient stopping sight distance in both directions. Only vehicles traveling north on East Marginal Way South will have adequate stopping sight distance for the proposed driveway. Both of the proposed driveways on South 128th Street meet the required entering sight distances for both passenger vehicles and combination trucks. Stopping sight distances are also sufficient for both driveways in both directions. B. Accident History: Accident information for the intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street was obtained from the City of Tukwila Department of Public Works. Only one accident has occurred at the intersection during the past three years. This accident occurred on July 22, 1993, due to driver inattention and there were no injuries, only property damage. C. Left Turn Lanes: The need for left -turn lane facilities at the intersection of East Marginal Way and South 128th Street was evaluated according to AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. According to information provided by Becker Transfer it was determined that the peak hour would be from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., the time period when all 45 employees arrived. The employee arrival patterns and volumes were assigned and are shown in Figure 2. The results of the evaluation indicated that the traffic volumes are too low to warrant a left turn lane on East Marginal Way South at the South 128th Street intersection. IV. CONCLUSION /SUMMARY According to the findings of this report it is recommended that the proposed parking lot be limited to only the two access locations on South 128th Street. This recommendation is based upon the following: 1. Entering sight distance for the proposed driveway on East Marginal Way is not adequate. 2. Stopping sight distance for the proposed driveway on East Marginal Way is not adequate in both directions. 3. The recommendation from the City of Tukwila that the intersection be restricted to an exit only would not promote a "safe" environment due to the lack of sight distance. 5 IEXPIRES: 1-12 - 95 1 ...�...».. ......,........, It is also recommended that on- street parking. be restricted: within the sight distance triangles along: East Marginal: Way South: and South 128th Street. This would include approximately 200 feet north of the southern intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street along the west side of East Marginal Way South, and the entire southern side (approximately 500 feet) of South 128th Street. These parking restrictions would provide the maximum amount of sight distance for the intersections and limit the adverse safety impacts. • `�, • ;..� 0 •'� uow'% % - /o- 9/e 1 #-Y -93 FIGURES NOT TO SCALE PAC-TECH & I I II r 119 Inc tagisers /Piares / Angrpn / etwaentti *NOW* • nom t3 • 442., RIP lam MTN MIA. WIC il. ..• .., Hem m MIN hew. IA NM MA VS Sly 11•••••■ IA II= ••■ . asyr, ne a •7•10 n mono Fe • WHIM VICAITY MAP BECKER TRANSFER TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 1 • e, cal y cP S 128TH ST S 128TH ST S 130TH ST 1') 10 (15) (2370 ADT) LEGEND • Q 0) M S 133RD ST 5 (7) XX (XX) 6:00 A.M. -7:00 A.M. VOLUMES (7:00 A.M. -8:00 A.M. VOLUMES) (XXXX ADT). 1993 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES NOT TO SCALE TRAFFIC VOLUMES USED TO EVALUATE LEFT TURN LANE CRITERIA. 7RAMC VOLIAIES BECKER TRANSFER TRAFFIC STUDY FIGURE 2 ' APPENDIX ENTERING SIGHT DISTANCE CALCULATIONS CAE t11C - �trn TTueOS i i i TI-k Le-FT DN2.Y .(. No2T+-i) .__Y. 1 s 1 ME AS' CF+S'E ; 111 B • I • 'Mom VIG i x -33 t S,?s02vt X11.05 t :11•8S � 2601 South 35th, Suite 200 • Tacoma, WA 98409 -7479 • 473 -4491 6100 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98188 -2441 • 243 -7112 3721 Kitsap Way, Suite 4 • Bremerton. WA 98312 -2461 • 377 -2053 3640 South Cedar, Suite A • Tacoma, WA 98409 -5700 • 473 -4491 PAC-TECil Engineering, Inc. Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists FOR: BECICEQ 't'QAOSFEi2. ESb ASI4TO C rLCS• FILE NO. 503Z2 TASK NO. PREPARED BY: H A 6 DATE: J I.3 3.13 CHECKED BY: SCALE: PAGE Z OF BOU T t-1 sr-Ta' T SC' t Lt —r 25 ! M P i1- fassuMCV(( DES1 (20 sPCc-D CASE lt1A - CROSSING MA- JEUVEQ ► i TQUUcs W I U- Be cross i JO Tv on i D12 i'Et.O fr y TO icy.'= 1.4V (S+ ta.) V' 25+nph . 07- Zs 3tDt55 IoI' 25 Pa PI-, CASE I t1 FS - LEFTTuQws 'TD THE LEFT (WEST) ic! ' 1.41■% Cn-Fa) •(P)141' : tat?) -4.4 S(v -5o) ' g3' .. �a (WB -5o) = q. Bs dCP) =235 BE LOA b -D ,. �1.ps �(FI� Ix -33) . ; d MB-50)2434': } f 1-0 THE K.tGNw t (ERST) ??(P) 940' 1 . Q(v4B -5o) 2 tit' 1.4 -1'f (T♦ ta) 'a(P) - 342' -a (WB -5o)' =12.6' Z5 mph .l_''i2 ri&' IX- 33 j I 1 ---- , S' • P - tta' -1 • t V - 'Ieh. 1en9th hCP) ° e' ( h (hiB -5o ) - 152 ot -h a(P)= 264 ii cWB-50);= 5 -410' c s 1110 - QI&HT Tui, S -TO ;ME LEFT on) Ly (h)ES-r) PAC-TECH Engineering, Inc. `0 Engineers / Planners / Surveyors / Environmental Specialists Mr. Ron Cameron City Engineer. City of i uicwiia 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Reference: Becker Transfer Traffic Study Mr. Cameron, Y-P ' 1 r' R E C E{ V„ fovember 5, 1993 NOV - 8 1993 TUKWiLA PUBLIC WORKS t t:::.. NOV' F„ /99:i GUivtt,•rt v'l'v DE \ /ELOP Mc After discussing traffic patterns and growth in the vicinity of the proposed Becker Transfer parking lot we feel a modification of the initial recommendations presented in our traffic study is appropriate. It is recommended that the proposed driveway access on East Marginal Way South be developed. This recommendation is based upon the following: 1. The intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street is a geometrically complex intersection. As indicated in the traffic study this intersection is inadequate for both entering sight distance and stopping sight distance according to current AASHTO standards. 2. The entering sight distance and stopping sight distance for the proposed driveway access on East Marginal Way South are also less than the full distances recommended by current AASHTO standards. However, the sight distance conditions for the proposed driveway do provide for a larger margin of safety than the conditions at the southern intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street. 3. Most of the vehicular traffic accessing the proposed parking lot will be traveling north (approximately 82 %) on East Marginal Way South. By allowing access to the parking lot directly from East Marginal Way South both passenger vehicles and trucks can avoid the intersection of East Marginal Way South and South 128th Street, and thereby utilize safer sight distance conditions. Environmental Services: 3640 South Cedar, Suite A • Tacoma, WA 98409 -5700 • (206) 473 -4491 • FAX (206) 474 -3695 Pierce County: (206) 473 -4491 • King County: (206) 243 -7112 • Kitsap County: (206) 377 -2053 With the development of the proposed driveway access on East Marginal Way South on- street parking will need to be restricted.on the west side of the street, between the proposed driveway_ location _and. the .southern intersection of East Marginal Way South and-South 128th Street. If there are any questions please contact either Heather Bornhorst or myself at (206) 473 -4491. Sincerely, James A. Mitchell, P.E. Transportation Manager City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director October 29, 1993 Mr. Jeff Mann PAC TECH Engineering, Inc. 6100 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Becker Trucking - L93 -0057 & L93 -0058. Dear Mr. Mann: I have completed my initial review of your request for a Conditional Use Permit and Environmental review and have the following comments: Background As you are aware, applications for a Conditional Use Permit (89-3 -CUP) and Design Review (89- 10 -DR) were submitted in 1989 for an identical proposal. The CUP and DR were conditionally approved with final conditions imposed by the City Council on February 22, 1990. An Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance was issued November 3, 1989. The proposal included creation of a parking facility for employee automobiles and semi - tractor trailer truck parking. One of the conditions of approval was that all improvements be installed within six (6) months of permit approval. This condition was not complied with and the Conditional Use Permit was subsequently revoked. There is no expiration for Design Review (DR) approvals, however, based upon current codes, DR approval would not be required. According to the Staff Report to the Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review dated November 10, 1989, DR was triggered due to the upgrade of non- conforming landscape areas. The site is a vacant, unimproved parcel. Because landscaping is generally part of a development proposal, compliance with applicable codes and regulations are typically included as part of the proposal. Therefore, there is no existing non - conforming condition. Design Review would therefore not be not necessary. The conditions have been included in this letter for your information only for both the CUP and Design Review. These conditions may be considered and /or modified in the overall review as either conditions or as recommended changes to the project prior to taking the project forward to the Planning Commission: DESIGN REVIEW CONDITIONS - FILE 89 -10 -DR 1. Deletion of entry point shown on plan off East Marginal Way; 2. Placement of wheel -stops in parking spaces adjacent to landscape areas; 3. Increase height of new landscaping /screening so that it will be a minimum of 10 feet high at installation; 4. All new landscaping areas will be automatically irrigated. Landscaping along the East Marginal Way property line will be enhanced to provide the same level of screening required along the 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206j 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Becker Trucking - CUP Page 2 south and west property lines. This requires the addition of shrubs and trees with the trees planted at 4 feet on center. The species will be identical to those planted on the adjacent property lines; 5. Provide a drainage system plant that will eliminate the flooding problem on South 128th Street. Plan will be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 6. Applicant will be required to install a security fence around the property with locking gates at entries. An eight foot high cyclone fence will be located inside the planting buffer and will include an additional two feet of barbed -wire at the top. 7. Revise landscape plan in the Southwest corner to decrease erosion that is currently occurring by retaining original landscape plan with the addition of erosion - resistant planting on slope and provide a curb to protect wall /edge of hillside from damage by automobiles. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS AS REVISED BY CITY COUNCIL - File 89-3 -CUP 1. Applicant will provide a 150% cash assurance for the cost of landscaping to include materials, labor and maintenance. 2. Use of site will be confined to parking of employee automobiles, trucks, tractors and trailers. 3. Hours of operation of the site will be confined to the hours between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.. 4. Applicant will comply with conditions of approval within six months of approval date (October 2, 1990) 5. A traffic study will be conducted to determine what will provide a safe intersection for automobiles. If a restriction of parking along East Marginal Way is deemed necessary, then an ordinance will be passed to provide for such restriction. The comments below are for the project now under review and incorporate those provided by the Departments of Public Works, Planning and Parks and Recreation: Environmental Review As indicated above, a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued November 3, 1989 for an identical proposal. No new potentially adverse environmental impacts are anticipated with the current proposal. Therefore, the original Determination of Nonsignificance still stands and further environmental review is not necessary. A refund is forthcoming. Site Plan 1. The location of the property line should be more clearly delineated, specifically on the north and east sides. Existing and proposed sidewalks should be clearly shown. 2. The maximum number of employees at any one time should be specified to better understand the amount of needed area within the proposed parking lot. 3. The location of the existing street within the South 128th Street right -of -way, with edges of pavement, will need to be shown as part of the application submittal. This will allow the Department of Public Works to determine whether or not the sidewalk location and street lane widths are acceptable. 4. Consider inclusion of picnic tables on the western edge of the site for employees. Becker Trucking- CUP Landscape Plan /Fencing Page 3 Several concerns were raised by residents when the project was initially proposed in 1989. • The CM (Industrial Park) .designation is considered a transition district between industrial and residential uses. Landscaping is commonly used to best alleviate visual impacts within transition districts. Because residential uses generally surround the site, the Tukwila Municipal Code requires a 15 -foot wide landscape buffer on all sides of the property. Conditions imposed (per DR) included restriction of access onto E. Marginal Wy. S. and construction of a security fence with gates and barbed wire at the top. A recommended approach to better mitigate the visual impact to surrounding residences would involve construction of a landscaped berm along the East Marginal Way frontage and potentially along the S. 128th Street frontage. A landscape architect can recommend a berm height and plantings to provide adequate screening and to best control erosion. All plantings should be drought - tolerant to avoid need for permanent automatic irrigation. Because the adequacy of landscaping is so critical to this project proposal based upon earlier input received from residents in 1989 and 1990, a landscape plan stamped by a registered landscape architect is required. It is recognized that there may be some conflict with some of the Design Review conditions related to types, sizes and placement of plant species, however, as indicated above, modifications can be made as part of the CUP review process. Drainage 1. A storm drainage analysis with calculations shall be provided for review in accordance with requirements stipulated in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This analysis shall include detention or retention facilities and address flows through the private Becker storm drainage system downstream on the north side of South 128th Street; 2. Storm drainage design shall also include provisions for the treatment of oil /grease /fuel contaminants associated with vehicles prior to conveyance off -site; 3. Any unstable or currently eroding slopes located on the property shall be stabilized as part of the development project (see landscape comment above); Traffic An evaluation of turning movements and proposed operation of the facility with regard to vehicular movements shall be submitted for review. This evaluation (traffic analysis) shall take into consideration sight distances on East Marginal Way south and South 128th Street with on- street parking in mind. At this time, it is recommended that access onto E. Marginal Wy. S. be limited to an exit only. The evaluation should considered exiting conditions in both north and south direction. This is similar to condition No. 5 of the revoked CUP. Conclusion It is desirable to limit the number of conditions for a permit as much as possible. Secondly, an attempt should be made to recognize and satisfy concerns raised by residents in 1989 -1990 to avoid a potentially lengthy process. For these reasons, I suggest revisions be made to the site plan and that a landscape plan be provided prepared by a licensed landscape architect which include the conditions and recommendations as identified above. : Page 4 The Planning Commission hearing is scheduled for November 18. The following should be provided by November 4, 1993: 1. Revised site plan 2. Landscape Plan prepared by a Landscape Architect 3. Traffic analysis Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 431 -3663. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin Associate Planner cc: L93 -0057 & L93 -0058 Files John Pierog, Dept. of Public Works Don Williams, Dept. of Parks and Recreation a t 60 J 10 �, oh o� P` �0 r J 7 r'N ,..., v��/ /•u S7 •2 q0 v •. 50 .60 0 9 8 7 6 Oe k. iz TD: 4& t r maim/ /34c 7E044 116 FAX #t: 2Jf3 — 74Pl09 A /N 51 1,.: FROM: ,1 ,,, kTh4rliK DATE: O /26 / 'f; , PAGES INCLUDING 7Z'44 - THIS PAGE: PHONE #: /?/ .'G7O FAX #: su 0 °I op I) N 4,7e-46 NetnS'•r:' 4- 5° ---7 5 1102.5/ p. '169°10 0 190.74 N N 0 L ,/,ee - //16' sr) /7 129 11 2 n 4 /6 5 210.27 242.50 255.o4 9Z9 3 10( OC S• ° N 224•e 0 20 4 //O. o4 Ele 23 230 o° ,11 as t' o1/0 24 /9 20 2/ 9 0 go 0 ti 11• tr 25 75/2o 5o4 /B - /2'.. So x. :7430-12-1C 892 3•3' 1 22 21 20 1- � v 30 1 20 35 1 s 7 • 238420 3z.,6 zo SO 50 :Ny40 32 6 7 S �G�o Pt.Af sus N/A'. ., agzo 6 45 17 N N N o� X2(15 0 00 18 8 %20110 19 ,IryO� og15 20 ti y 2 LS' 7 230 , .Z2o 7/ 332 --f tp ■ • X 7 /UU. 301�F5 87.3{ " I " W 55 19 So 18 h� .55 7117:1-) • 110 x,323 • ,Oo 0- m o o, 1200° 21 X47 .50 ••� 17 93.66 16 94.75 15 94.69 30 20 do P° 01 sa tlo J0 4 S• 10 2 • ,00 X - 50 .50.47 11 ,50.72 "'193 X60 73 10 0 13 /36 • • 'J 0 - N 0` H e.'go4 �ooyy 13 94.53 14.41 �� 0 G. ,A 1 130 101`410 01 0 ,1000 0'1G • /20 00 �- a N 1 /20 N h a� (159.987 m h 110 t,(9 40 4 664 111 ‘i 0115 h ,5 ''c r gTA, g0 t 48.00 •.eN0 esTn9R 1�OTH oy ST- FA Ow 41 A w TRUCKING, INC. COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE June 7, 1993 City of'iE'ukwila 6200 Southcenter.BLvd Tukwila, WA 98188 ATTN.: Jack Pace RE: Parking Lot Dear Jack, We are currently working on development, plans for our parking lot on E. Marginal WayS. Enclosed is a letter from Dave Kehle. You should have received this letter directly (see attached). • , We are presently leasing parking facilities from Sabey Corporation on West Marginal Way for,our trailers until our parking facilities are complete on E. Marginal Way S. We thought these facilities were located outside Tukwila city limits. We received a letter from Ken Strickley, Sabey Corp., with concerns about a call from Darrin Wilson and a. copy of the . code # 18.52.040 - General Landscaping and screening-requirements (see attached). This is a temporary parking facility with equipment coming and going all day long, we are not using these facilities for a storage yard. I respectfiilly request some kind ofrelieffrom your code enforcement until our parking lot is complete. If you need more information from me to resolve this matter, please call me. Thank you in advance for your consideration Sincerely Rolan Becker NOV 1 5 1994 GCj DEVELOPT).-; P.O. Box 68426 • 12677 E. Marginal Way S. • Seattle, WA 98168 -0426 206- 246 -9500 • 1- 800 - ASK- BECKER, • Fax 206 -246 -9603 SALE: 111=50' 0 N C8 "8"—•43 233.97' _ x-_.--- : X ------XX X--'— c a „A" PAVED AREA EXISTING BECKER TRANSFER CURB c WHs' E OFFICE _ _• RECEiV SEP 1 41993 CUtvt v UNITY DEV LOPrv7ENT MON. S. 128TH ST. L'13 -coM PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MON. in Figure g masonry B. For the ry the frost FOUNDATION ;ICK WALL 4" •er Stan- aw York, CO MitTrF4 VFOCIPAULAO aaminie. ALTERNAIS: err SuP21511:1H6. (continued from fr BERMS AND BAN. 6.11 Berms and Banks Figures 6-69 and 6-70 illust: and banks. • • 4.".'• Figure 6-69 Berms. 71-Ase51:ei64o ELE.VATION BLOCK ON EDGE , 3 2,43. 134 ist-d EA!RTH" ItERIA e PLANTING R x_1.5,11.r CLAY SOIL (N0 SAND) 4" LAP —TOP SOIL 24" METAL T- PINS 2.-0" 0. C 11 GLASS FIBER BLANKET 6' WIDE x 150 LONG Figure 6-70 Banks. (left) Concrete -block riprap; solid block 4 by 8 by 16 inches. laid dry. (center) Stone riprap. (right) Grass. Sow grass seed and cover with a glass fiber blanket. held in place with T pins. •IRA,S71:—.1.1 .5104-S ; • 4 SOURCES: Schnadelbach Braun Partnerst and J. H. Callender, Time -Saver Standarc McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 19 Regular Meeting Minutes April 2, 1990 Page 3 Public Hearing (con't) '"Becker Transfer Phil Hemenway, 4036 So. 128th Street, stated that he lives approximately 300 feet from Mr. Becker's business. In his opinion, Becker Transfer is harmonious with the neighborhood, provides employment and tax revenue for Tukwila. Mr. Hemenway does not feel expansion should be discouraged. Donna Meagher, 13242 - 40th Ave. So., commented that not all residents in Riverton want the area to remain residential. Several people on her street would be more than willing to sell to a developer. The neighborhood has been encroached upon by industrial businesses for several years. Ms. Meagher feels Mr. Becker should be granted a CUP for his trucks. She would ble to see the area fenced. Bill Scheffler, 4033 So. 128th St., commented that he had been a member of the advisory board that helped put together the pre - annexation zoning. Some of the residents who are protesting Mr. Becker's business in a residential neighborhood were also asked and encouraged to join the board but elected not to at that time. He commended the staff for the written recommendations that were presented to the Planning Commission at their second meeting on February 22. Mr. Scheffler feels a fence and a gate are appropriate to the site as children are attracted to the equipment. He would also like to see increased landscaping along East Marginal Way as a way of buffering the residential community from the effects of expansion. Employee parking has already become a problem on the side street across East Marginal Way on So. 128th. Parking should be restricted to the parking lot with access to the lot from So. 133rd and East Marginal Way. Beverly Nicholson, 3810 So. 130th Street, objects that the Planning Commission did not follow the recommendations of their staff when they met on February 22nd. The recommendations from the staff on the fencing, the gate, the hours, the landscaping and parking were changed to what Mr. Becker wanted on each one of those points. Ms. Nicholson requests that those points be gone over again and do what the staff recommended. Jeff Mann, PacTech Engineering, 6100 Southcenter Blvd., reported that Mr. Becker's application lication has been through considerable review. Mr. Becker originallyapplied for a Design Review permit after which he was informed he would have to apply for a Conditional Use Permit He recognized that through the annexation process the property was zoned for industrial use, provided that conditions be put in place on this site. Consistent with the purpose of the Conditional Use Permit, twelve conditions have been placed on this application. Mr. Mann reviewed the conditions with the Council. Of the 12 conditions, there are three conditions and one issue that are the focus of Mr. Becker's appeal In regard to Item #1, Condition #2, the Planning Commission added trucks, tractors and trailers because they realized that trucks would be taking the trailers onto this site and may sit there temporarily. The main transfer operations are still out of the area to the north. Regarding Item #2, Condition #6 - Fencing: Mr. Becker would be willing to install a solid fence around the site if there would be some relief on the closeness and number of trees required in the landscaping. With regard to East Marginal Way, Item #3, Condition #4, three additional trees will be located in certain gaps where trees have been removed in the past. We do not want the re-T2 frame for the four foot on center trees as required on the two sides that abut the single family zoning. Finally, regarding the transition area, Mr. Mann stated that the Planning Commission's comment was made to reflect the fact that the City did ado • CM zoning for this property. Becker Transfer accepts the 12 con • • ns; they are significant and will screen .the site. Councilman Rants asked if there was enough parking on the site for employees. Mr. Mann replied that parking is adequate for now. There is no ordinance that prevents parking on the street Regular Meeting Minutes April 2, 1990 Page 4 Public Hearing (con't) Staff Report Citizen Comments Rebuttal Councilman Robertson asked the difference between a parking lot and a transfer terminal. Mr. Becker responded that at a transfer terminal a trailer is unloaded from one trailer to another. On the parking lot tractors, trucks and trailers would be parked. Councilman Lawrence inquired if the Planning staff had worked with Becker Transfer in consideration of the citizens concerns. Molly Headley, Assistant Planner, responded that they had worked together and Becker Transfer had indicated they would be cooperative in providing whatever was required to gain approval for the Conditional Use Permit. Councilman Lawrence commented that it appeared staff was recommending Council to do what they did not recommend the Planning Commission do. Rick Beeler responded that staff forwarded their recommendation to the Planning Commission on the basis of the staff review. The Planning Commission then acts upon staff's recommendation. They can agree, disagree of modify. Councilman Lawrence clarified that once the Planning Commission has made a decision, even if it overrides staff's position, staff will defend the decision made. Phil Hemenway stated that even though he was a member of the task force he did not feel they had an opportunity to have meaningful data on single family residential. Beverly Nicholson suggests fencing the property to avoid children playing on the grounds. Gary Evans, 4020 So. 128th St., lives above Mr. Becker's property. He has not seen children playing on the property as suggested. There are many large trucks that travel through the area, but there does not appear to be complaints about them. He sees no reason to deny Mr. Becker's request. Mr. Mann stated that Mr. Becker has worked with.the City throughout thin entire pros. He is making substantial improvements to the site and has accepted many of the conditions imposed. A fence at this time is not needed for operational purposes. The 12 conditions that are imposed will provide the City with studies on intersections and drainage. The site will be improved and visually protected. He concluded by asking for Council's approval. Rick Beeler commented that the issue is not if there should be a deviation of the plans. The issue is whether or not the preponderance of evidence has proven that Council should reach a different conclusion than the Planning Commission. The presence of trucks, trailers or tractors on the property fora temporary period of time is a very difficult thing for the City to enforce. Bill Scheffler stated that if the use of the property is going to be increased, the citizens want a higher degree of landscaping with the exception of increased density of vegetation along East Marginal Way to buffer the existing single.family homes across the street. With the added vegetation that is going around the property and no lighting, a paved site is inviting to vanous types of criminal activity. • Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez closed the public hearing at 8:38 p.m. Counciiinan Robertson read from the Tukwila Zoning Code and • commented that driving trucks in and out constantly contributes to a high pollution source. It's a very heavy use of roads, provides danger and a lot of traffic. The buffer of trees does very little to prevent noise. If the CM district was intended to be transition zoning, that transition is to be a transition between the commercial use and the heavy industrial use. Trucking is considered by the Tukwila Zoning Code to be one of the worst sources of pollution. Regarding the two sites, loading and unloading a truck will produce some amount of noise, but not as much as driving the tractors back and forth, hooking Regular Meeting Minutes April 2,1990 Page 5 Public Hearing (con't1 up the trucks to trailers and moving them. This site is used for moving trailers in and out. It is doubtful the site would be used as much as the site across the street, but that's still the intended purpose and that is why the addition of tractors was added to it. The intended use of the site is contradictory to the intended purpose of this property which is a park -like transition between residential use and industrial use. Mr. Robertson stated he does not want to sit in the Planning Commission's role and second guess whether the three items that were appealed were right or wrong. However, he is convinced there was not an acceptable compromise reached between the residential community and the property owner. In conclusion, Councilman Robertson recommended that Council uphold the appeal and deny the application and send them back to find a compromise. The intended use of this property is not allowed except as a conditional use in any of Tukwila's zones. It is not allowed at alfas a conditional use in the four lighter commercial uses. If the property owner intends to use it to drive the trucks back and forth, which is the highest polluting source, then it's necessary for the property owner to find an acceptable compromise. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, TO UPHOLD THE APPEAL AND DENY THE APPLICATION. • Councilman Rants commented that the staff and citizens and Becker came to a good compromise. He is in favor of upholding the appeal and revising the Planning Commission decision. We could do that to . ' . t. All we need to o is put in the fencing and the planting that our • • .1 Department suggested. He is opposed to denying Mr. Becker's • t to start off with his groperty� however, he feels the Council is upholding the appeal the way the citizens wanted it done. Councilman Moriwaki stated that there is another specific reason for scrutinizing the situation which has not been discussed. The map show that areas that the CM areas that have those kind of trucks don't butt up next to single - family residences. That's why it is e= tremely,important that we take the time and energy to make sure the impacts of what this operation does on the surrounding • community. All the other CM goes along the river south of I-405 to south of Southcenter along I -5. The reason other appeals are not scrutinized so closely is because there are no residences next to the businesses. Regarding the parking on the street issue, Councilman Moriwaki commented that once the parking lot is paved and unlit and dark, it's a nice place to hide out. That's another serious concern. The fencing issue is one of security for Mr. Becker's property and and to the community. He concluded by stating he would against the motion; however, he would like to have the second motion to hold up the appeal and go through the Commission points. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez asked counsel if she would be allowed to vote on this issue even though she was chairing the meeting. Attorney clarified that she would. Hernandez stated that she would vote against the motion because she feels Council should uphold the appeal but revise the decision She would rather see planned parking in a parking area than require people to park on the street. Councilman Robertson commented that he feels in this case it is necessary for a solid compromise to be reached and not a decision levied by the Council sittiva in for the Planning Commission. with a few moments study and a httle testimony. He doesn't feel that's Council's role. Regular Meeting Minutes April 2, 1990 Page 6 Public Hearing (con't) Councilman Lawrence also opposed the motion stating that in light of what the Planning Commission had done, he did not feel Council could reach a compromise that would work out. *MOTION FAILS 4-2. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY RANTS, THAT COUNCIL UPHOLD THE APPEAL AND REVISE THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION BASED ON THREE STATED CONDITIONS: 2)) TRUCKS AND TRACTORS; 4) PLANTING ENHAN ; 6) FENCING OF THE PROPERTY.* For clarification Councilman Moriwaki stated that this motion is to follow the Planning staffs recommendations and to appeal the Planning Commissions new impositions and definitions. Councilman Robertson asked Office of Community-Development (OCD) Director Rick Beeler, and Assistant Planner Molly Headley if they understood what they would do with this based on the information. Ms. Headley replied she understood that they would look at the staff memorandum dated February 12,1990 which addresses the issues that resulted in these conditions. On page three of the re • • rt under Recommendation, number 1) Use of site will be co • • • ed to parking of employee automobiles and truck trailers, was the original recommendation of the Planning Commission. We would change that recommendation to include tractors, truck tractors and trailers. Councilman Robertson inquired what would stop this site from becoming another transfer station. Mr. Beeler responded that the applicant would have to go through another Conditional Use Permit The CUP is attached to the site. If another owner came in, e would have to live with the same conditions unless they came back to the Planning Commission and the CUP process to change those editions. Councilman Moriwaki, noted on page two of the same staff report under Design Review Related Concerns, Citizen Concern #3 listed the concern that the lot would be used for inappropriate activities after hours. Staff response listed a gate and/or fence could address this concern. Ms. Headley responded that the concern would be handled through Recommendation #3 on page three: Applicant will revise site plan to provide locking gates at entry to site. Councilman Moriwaki noted the word "fence did not appear in the recommendation. The motion he put forward was to follow with Condition #6 and fence the property when required. MOVED BY MOR1WAKI, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO REQUIRE APPLICANT TO REVISE SITE PLAN TO PROVIDE LOCKING GATES AT ENTRY AS A CONDITION OF THE APPLICATION. ** Councilman Robertson commented that "fencing" had not been defined as to type and height. Mr. Beeler responded that security fences are normally eight foot cyclone fences with another two feet of barbed wire at the top. He added that Council coup further define the issue if they wished. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY LAWRENCE, THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO REQUIRE THAT A SECURITY FENCE BE PLACED INSIDE OF THE PLANTING BUFFER * ** Regular Meeting Minutes April 2, 1990 Page 7 Public Hearing (con't) Councilman Moriwaki stated that he amended the motion to be more specific. The recommendation on page three under Recommendation simply states: 'The applicant will revise site plan to provide locking gates at entry to site.' The intent for a fence is there, but it is not stated in a recommendation. ** *MOTION CARRIED AS AMENDED Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez commented she would vote against the original amendment because she did not want to require locking gates. She feels it would create more of a danger to have people leave their cars running while they unlock a gate. **MOTION CARRIED AS AMENDED. On the issue of the truck/tractor/trailer parking, Councilman Rants remarked that you can't expect to haul trucks m there without having a tractor on them. Councilman Lawrence commented that if we are requiring the fence for security then as long as the primary use is for tractor and employee parking, he sees no reason to not allow the incidental parknig of trucks and tractors. Councilman Robertson added that if one of the concerns was the noise pollution and air pollution from the use, forcing the applicant to put the trucks somewhere else is going to increase the noise and air pollution, not decrease it. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY LAWRENCE TO AMEND THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO DENY THE APPEAL TO CONDITION #2. *• Councilman Moriwaki stated that he will vote for the motion; however, the intent of the applicant is to use the area for parking **MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Robertson asked Mr. Beeler what would prevent the use of the area which is intended to be employee parking from being used for truck parking. Mr. Beeler responded that it could be brought back to the Planning Commission who could revise or deny (revoke) Conditional Use Permit as one of the conditions of the CUP is the site plan. *MOTION CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION IS APPROVED AS AMENDED. BIM} Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez called a brief recess. 9:10 p.m. - 9:20 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:20 p.m. with Councilmembers in attendance as listed above. OLD BUSINJSS Ord. #1560, Recreating the Tukwila Planning Commission MOVED BY DUFFLE, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Colgrove read an Ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Wsabing on, recrea ' the Tukwila Planning Commission, prescribing its duties, authority : . and repealing Ordinance No. 1112 and Ordinance No.1550 Councilman Lawrence commented that he is in favor of the ordinance; however, because of the timing, a portion of the community has interpreted the ordinance as being aimed at specific individuals rather than the principle. it his opinion, passing the ordinance today rather that in the near future wont bring any particular benefit to the issue other than to cloud the issue further. Regular Meeting Minutes April 2, 1990 Page 8 Old Business ( con't) Citizen Comment MOVED BY LAWRENCE, SECONDED BY DUFFLE, THAT THE ISSUE OF RECREATING THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE FIRST REGULAR MEETING IN SEPTEMBER. * Councilman Rants commented he is not in favor of postponing the issue. Councilman Moriwaki agreed and added that change in organizations causes pain and controversy and to wait until a later tint: won't make it any less painfuL The intent of the ordinance is very clear in the "Whereas" statements —that we want to increase residential representation on the commission. That is the intent and purpose. In response Councilman Lawrence stated by delaying our decision, we can prove that our intent has nothing to do with,individuals coming up for appointment immediately and has nothing,to do with issues facing us in the next few months. F In favor of the motion, Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez commented that she doesn't mind changing the six year term to four years, and she doesn't mind requiring residency; however, she feels it is important to designate the two business representetaves whether they are business or citizens. Mrs. Hernandez added'ihat in the three years she has sat on the Council she has never heard anyone address the Council under Citizen Comments complaining,about the Planning Commission. We have also approved several appointments to the Commission during the same time period and no, one has come forward to speak against any of the a . • • intments. The complaints have never been publicly expressed. • . en requesting agenda items for the Council retreat in January the topic of the re- composition of the Planning Commission was never suggested for discussion. If people have a problem with the Planning Commission it's Council's responsibility to enact the legislation to give them the guidelines to act by. We must give them the proper zoning code ordinances, the proper design code standards, and all the proper guidelines that they need to base their decisions on. Hernandez.beieves that the proper checks and balances are in place. The Council confirms every appointment to the Planning Commission. We can deny the applications if we wish. Regarding the of terms of office, Mrs. Hernandez feels the current terms should be allowed to expire in due course. She is not sure that a Commission member Should be removed for anything but ne gene or malfeasance. If we allow the proper course to continue, there will be autos vatic vacancies occurring that some of the new applicants could, be considered for. With the Sensitive Areas Ordinance, the Clearing and • Ordinance and possibhy the Multi- Family Study all,ready to go to the Commission, it's not a good time to break the continuity in a team that's working well together. Mrs. Hernandez is concerned whether this ordinance in the best interest of ,the City or not. She regrets that the volunteers who have given their . time have been made to feel unappreciated. She offered her apologies to the volunteers. In conclusion, Mrs. Hernandez stated she hoped that those of the Council who favored the ordinance would reconsider taking action at this time and allow some of these feelings to be considered. Jerry Hamilton, 5624 So. 147th Street, Planning Commission member, stated he does not take issue with the Council., The Council has a legal right to do what they care to do with those terms*L..vlong as there are reason' for changing the terms. If they are personal reasons, they should be cast aside and objective reasons applied to changing the terms. The other issue is the makeup of the Planning Commission. Mr. Hamilton noted that when he was first on the commission he wondered what the business persons were doing on the Planning Commission, they don't really have a right to be on the Planning Commission. For three years be worked with three different non- resident business people. He found them to be bright, intelligent people. Two business people out of a total of seven commissioners will not hurt the City. There are five other resident commissioners who will keep them in check if necessary; however, in three years he City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM To: Brad Collins, Planning Director 6 FROM: . Mark Caughey, Associate Planner DATE: 7 May 1982 SUBJECT: Truck Terminal Definition This memo is sent to you on behalf of the Tukwila Board of Adjustment following their meeting of 6 May 1982 at which the definition and inter- pretation of Truck Terminals within the city was modified. The de- finition which was adopted by the Board on 6 May supersedes that con- tained in the memorandum of 4 October 1978 from Roger Blaylock which discusses the Board's prior interpretation of this type of facility on 21 September 1978:: TRUCK TERMINAL -- Truck terminal means a site or building, or a tenant space within a building the occupant of which is a holder of a certificate of public necessity from the Interstate Commerce Commis- sion, the Washington Utilities and Transporta- tion Commission or a similar agency, and which exhibits any one of the following characteris- tics of use: - -the business location is a place to receive, pick -up and /or deliver orders which are placed by customers. - -The business includes the use of a dispatcher (functioning with that or any other title) which directs the activities of the truck driver. - -The business location is used by the truck car - rier to receive shipments for transloading, trans- shipping and /or consolidation, or from which•trans- portation ensues after transloading, transshipping or deconsolidation, whether or not rolling stock of the carrier is parked at the location during periods of non -use. All businesses meeting this definition, except those located in *the M -2 zoning dtstrict, will be expected to obtain a Conditional Use Permit prior to beginning..:operation, and only in those zoning districts where truck terminals are'recognized "as a conditional use. ( C'l i-:--- AUG 0 6 1993 raiiiiiiiiiim6 CONDIT.JNAL USE APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Parking lot for employees as well as trailer parking. � C� - � 1 1� C & 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) g. h1l}r'�idt/A') buy 5 SW corner of the intersection of South 128th Street and East Marginal Way. Quarter: NW 3. APPLICANT:* Section: 15 Township: 23 (This information may be found on your tax statement) Name: PAC -TECH Engineering, Inc. Address: ^r , Phone. 206 243 -7112 Z1fS ! /0 7 --r-//)( 017.1-k-- Signature: ) Date: g IL ( 3 * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. Range: 4 < 27o 4q z\ 1 r / 2/z Fttc fi7k 7&JIT 6100 Southcenter Blvd., #100,.Seattle Wa 98188 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: Edwin Becker OWNER Address: 16878 SR 78th, Re11Pvue WA 98008 QNb - 9540 Phone: (2.04'l, I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract pur aser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the g /. J 93 best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: ftriy- ,� —r9v3' CONDITIONAL USE APP( ;ATION Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY :Employee parking, truck trailer parking (unimproved lot 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): Conditional uses listed in the specified use district. 7. ADJACENT LAND USES North: Becker Transfer Company - Truck terminal South: Residential single family homes East: Vacant property `blest: Residential single family homes 8. DETAILED DESCRLPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): Prnv -ide Pmpinyee parking for Becker Transfer employees Provide pal-king for truck trailers. 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? Yes 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: Operations on the site will primarily occur during normal business hours. The site will be heavily screened by landscaping on boundaries abutting residential areas. The site is adjacent to East Marginal Way which serves industrial traffic. No lighting is proposed. Landscaping will mitigate potential detriment to surounding properties. B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: The site has provided 15 to 22.5 feet of lanscaping as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. Trees will be planted at an initial 6 feet (1 foot over the minimum of five feet). Screening trees will be planted 4' on center which will provide a total site obscurring buffer. CONDITIONAL USE APPS 'ATION Page 3 10. (continued) C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: No buildings are proposed. The proposed use will be compatible with the existing industrial uses in the area and will use the same materials for ingress and egress. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: Comprehensive planning efforts as part of the annexation designated this site for commercial /manufacturing uses. The site will propose a low intensity use that is well buffered to providr compatibility and consistancy with land use policies. E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE: Screening of the site will mitigate potential aesthetic impact. The site will • -,- • U11 • 19 .V• • •v .-. •• ina or • I. SS water from the •arkin area. There will he no on -site lighting, RECEIVE .... Alai 0 6 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Purpose of Checklist: Environmental Checklist 1-.-q 3- 0057 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determine if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Becker Transfer Parking Lot 2. Name of applicant: PAC —TECH Engineering, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Person: 4. Date checklist prepared: July 2.0, 1993 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila Jeffrey D. Mann, Project Manager PAC —TECH Engineering, Inc. 6100 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 (206) 243 -7112 6. Proposed timing or schedule (inclut....g phasing, if applicable): In spring of 1994 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None to our knowledge. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will he needed for your proposal, if known. Design Review and Conditional Use Permits, Engineering Plans. eirsq ?) • De pceeeNEJ I11' • 't-r) / locJ 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). Conditional Use Permit for employee and truck trailer parking. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundary of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Southwest corner of East Marginal Way and 128th Street. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The majority of the site gently rises from the north to the south. In the southwest corner, there is a class 2 slope area. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site is relatively flat. The area that will be used for parking has a 2% (approximate) slope. The southwestern corner has a cut slope that will remain as is. 6 0-6J5 Z. 0- ? . & B. (.e EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are foun....n the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, pt.—, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site is urban land with gravelly sandy foams which have not been used for agriculture purposes. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. This site will be graded in order to prepare a surface for paving. The general topography of the site will remain intact in order to provide for drainage which will take surface waters to a drainage facilities in South 128th. The class 2 slope will be left alone and vegetation, grass, shrubs and trees will remain on the slope. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use'? If so, generally describe. Yes, however minimal. Temporary erosion control plans will be implemented as part of construction as required by the City. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 73% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures will be implemented as part of construction in order to prevent off -site erosion and also control dust and mud on adjacent streets. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions from construction equipment during grading and paving of site. Emissions from asphalt concrete mix during paving operations. Longer term emissions from the site will result from employee vehicles entering and exiting the site. Emissions from trucks moving trailers onto the site will also occur. 3 1 b. Are there any off -site sources of e,...asions or odor that may affect your propos,,.. If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed, other than adhering to PSAPCA's regulations in regards to particulate matter. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no surface water bodies located immediately on or adjacent to the subject site. The Duwammish River is located approximately one quarter mile to the northeast of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not Applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descriptions, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Oils and greases from pavement surfaces resulting from vehicular use of the site will be washed away and surface waters will run off site during periods of rain. Excess storm water from the site will be controlled, contained and conducted to City of Tukwila storm drainage facilities. 4 b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other water? If so, describe. Runoff will occur as a result of rain water collecting on the paved parking lot surface. Catch basins will be utilized to collect storm water which will be piped .to a retention pond on the northerly boundary of the site. The retention pond will meter and control off — site volumes and will be collected in the City of Tukwila storm drainage system, which will eventually conduct it to the Duwammish River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. See 3A.6 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See Item 3C.1 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing vegetation in areas which are proposed for paving will be cleared and vegetation removed. 5 dub 5Lrz'r144' 1 • l I ; : Exiting Douglas Firs and deciduous trees locateu around the perimeter of the site will be retained and enhanced by landscaping as shown on the site plan. Approximately three existing trees will be removed from areas which are proposed for paving. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Preservation of existing Douglas Fir and deciduous tress along the perimeter of the site and enhancement of the vegetative buffer by the placement of Douglas Fir and other shrubs and ground cover in order to enhance the landscaping and vegetation on the site. 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Small field mammals. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: field mammals, rodents, etc fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Fossil fuels will be used by vehicles during construction including employee vehicles and trucks bringing trailers to the parking lot. 6 3 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties! If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None Proposed. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Any noise from East Marginal Way or existing' transfer operations to the north would not affect the operation of this parking lot. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: •Noise from construction vehicles during grading and paving operations. Long term: Noise from employee vehicles and from trucks bringing trailers onto the site for parking. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Proposed landscape buffer will provide some noise mitigation. Restriction of on —site traffic from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is presently undeveloped with some employee parking occurring in the northeast corner of the site. Some trailers are located on the site. To the north is the existing Becker Transfer offices and operations 7 center. To the west and south are single family homes, and to the east are existing businesses and single family homes in the CM zone. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (CM) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of 'the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, Nocify. — L: U�� i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The development of the site will include the maintenance of exiting trees and the addition of supplemental landscaping in order to provide a significant landscape buffer for screening between the proposed parking lot and single family areas to the west and south. Access is from South 128th and East Marginal Way. Traffic from the site will enter and exit from East Marginal Way in order to reduce impacts on resid-- areas to the west. The site will not include loadin• or unloadin., in order to e amount o activity and potential noise impacts on surrounding areas. • 8 1 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are included as part of this project. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proposed landscaping as described in the land use section. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare impacts may occur from vehicles utilizing the site during designated dark hours. b. Could light or glare form the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The proposed landscaping should mitigate any light and glare impacts. Light and glare should have minimal impact on surrounding properties. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed landscaping should mitigate any potential light and glare impacts on surrounding properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Southgate Park located at South 134th Street and 40th Avenue. Rainier Golf and Country Club located to the northwest at Glendale Way South and Des Moines Way South. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site would be provided from South 128th Street and East Marginal Way. See site plan. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, East Marginal Way at South 130th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The site would provide 48 employee parking spaces, as well as 17 trailer space parking spots. No parking spaces would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No 10 e; Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 70 -80 vehicle trips per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Restriction of access to South 128th will reduce potential impacts on East Marginal Way. Access path will be restricted to East Marginal Way and 128th. Traffic by employees or trucks will not go westbound on 128th into residential areas. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally, describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. The site will require storm drainage service. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Surface water will be collected on -site and conducted to City of Tukwila Storm Drainage facilities by way of an on -site control /retention facility. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:ti,- Date Submitted. 8/040 1 R3 11 :m BECKER TRANSFER PARKING LOT SITE PLAN t: cm CIDDDAIDIAA (C1144,42 S. 128th STREET a/M Orr 2 ,jr rani. 1T mc T1l1A.O mato N,vpDCDPC 121, ru ' u+auo.... 044•41.44.4.• ..rs..t. urn 55 • norn+lw 1T.A.Om1 C WHO .gym U Imo... owa.n..u.7Tw roe a —" r1ltQ1 .Auric m M/w ri I 0 ICADo.aADDa Corr) • ces ;-i ..e0 ,.OV1t n.......... r_ fl......oD:- .... .......o w....... viclarm n.. 1.D 1740. 63141*.DO. AO1D.Q. 1.11, ammo rxxcxx. 10.. 11w10-023,43 OVtDYQ ►A..SO. 41 TPAlla. IMAGES. 17 .,m.00►C Ara.. ,.50.D sport .1..e. 5.1.0.5.22..c. DRS =OUTDO Tr.m. LS93 AlTQC44A Pi t 0 e 0 0 s 0 SHEETL 0i I:1 A 20' 24'- 4'OL. BECKER TRANSFER PARKING LOT SITE PLAN L. cis .. w..✓. S. 128th STREET UM,CR, BALMY BALTZCA I1 1.TIC ZVY 2 1/2" PC S, 12•• W TRIANCUMATED 0NN PARI f[1LCH n AC •1•..fa tnrrs } 40 j' LANDSCAPE KEY TCFANTr 25 1 ( 1 Cp. Ma0gy1 De! ZRGw 1 ►ra. .-F 55 1 S I PH0173!IA FRAZERS ' CSAaIE:1 AS NEEDED' C—) 1 Iteorz % HAL.DC BALTSG 1 BALTIC SW AS NEZDEDI MINE 1 CEDAR BARK 111.1LW++ 1 N/A -. 1 0 1 C.aro.45.. -ER. 1 [5...w0 "4o -re.: NY ......L bE P.L.tTm v• -•i TLL4T .0.4 C.d.! .7 A4106+ED ,tsa.J Z YGAt1 —1iL GT" GGOI. NN a cON N \ 0 c N. 1O 04.1.Wa 1• f Et C e JI• 000000000000*0eeceeo _� --..,...7.---.,, \ `\ \ \, \ ��\ \�� \ \ ../'\ - d0 \`• / WOOD FRAME HOUSE I pernce• =Milk ?L' u.w - 4'O.C. Cat. CTP.Br o crvcRb% • LeYLauo CIVREss TL' LL.G4 6' CAG. F. + at-uw✓ YICZlfl'T1C r 1•' 2564 STTF. nATA ISLZN0 ZONn.RS: 0-1 ACREAGE: 1.5 ACRES PARCEL N0_: 238420-005-03 E Wt-0Yme PARA=NG: 43 . TRAILER SPACES: 17 LANDSCAPE AREA: 1f.,7700 �p.r ze4oplt E�s-r- PX- 57tE ns. BECKER TRANSFER PARKING LOT SITE PLAN S. 128th STREET Coln.Res.re¢ (ucEwwc.) - 4*OL" VT¢NIT"! MAP 1. 2660' 19 K 4E.4.44 Err. SYTE DATA 'FISTING 2CPCSNC: G-1 ACREAGE: 1.5 ACRES FARM. NO.- 238420--005-03 EMPLOYEE PARSING: 43 TRAILER SPACES: 17 LANDSCAPE AREA: 14,?00 N4.PT. 22 051OTAL 51 5 1L9 I ® 1 Ca-,,,.,,41.k..rei..1m tuD 1.,.....E /CMO SS 1 ® 1 PHOT TIA FRASER-I (SAME) AS NE ED1 C) I ELEDEJRA HALIDE BAUTICA BAL.TZC IVY A. NEEDED1 Nate I CSAR SARK MULCH N/A 54 { 0 (corouE .. r3c (o...r..) 0000000000 ac CRVREY.o CYPCRI`rK-LM...q TL' u.::u • n• CLL. / P Qbs1Wbt SHEETL OFt JO. 1.0 .50322___ . 638.56 5EE SW 10- Z3 -4 .50 13 h 4 ' 01� 50v S X `.) 128TH ST -)e 12 50 3 30 2 h 50 30 7BO724QS92 53' 22 7/1/2 3 014 5 • )( • .. •JC k• 55 19 SO 18 h4 93.66 20 35 '• 16 " 00� o m0 N 50 X0e 3'1° * 14 ;5.35 1 N nA� N ,50.1(. 2. N npo ,N N •/ 238420 SO .55 3 "•a 23 • So lS 5 06 7 30 94.7.5 y0<) ZAv a 8 20 30 ft- 51 S , vA� • ' 14 -4 ' N , 93 9 to 24 3� 2 0.7e 94.0 .1 \c.. 2 00• 5 14 si 94.64 15 30 20 •193.19 N ao v N 13 0. 0 Q- m N 15 110 12 0 4115 19 375.57 CO 2.0 '00 0 o°' 0 2.1 .60.4 II 13460 vo\- • ‘3 �36� Q. N o� trim i m 0(i'3 2.2. 2.3 2.4 0 o qq 0 94.59 • 6.0000 Nff- 00y5 13 h Nw 94.53 O I- v4 (1) 12 94.4.7 W M Y1 01t. q 0 °C 01 • 120 01' 120 (159 30 110 '25 10 H 0 SAMPSON fZv) 400.91 siA 50 + 46.00 eN0 eSTne' RST 130TH 90.51n • m I N� Cr .99.75' / Cl O> °o0 602 °05 3 • fr)m 0 Ay •'?n ill ■ S.+ ,gip N LT4170 '5i1 t1J iii ,er5 '.r? i 4.......____......: „w..1 7.1 l rc 'y. ' ... r • } Y f594G r.- `¢ 01 f.;* . 6/.... • L .a C i O ' :' r5.a -i 0 a. �' au (O -y ..... '' :.a.i 4441%.1...`i ,1 C f N 0 N `.• c, o. u 0 3. 3. _'•• 4 u ..3? 79 0 —4 r ..!5.97 , '` V‘ �► 0 2 52 .+a,,... 0 ` 1777 usYt t1A o41;0 1. (J . Ow D 0 cn '•:• .'.v0•na•;lop � v L (tl r 1'F EPLj T- 54 rOR -0�w� .�_ —:021-C • 32S.E.:�_�.::._i?"1 .,J L....- _•_'•yl...._ — N. ;N or q, i 2;•. d FtX+c S: v�••j.:0 A9 vb17 !QD r' • • • C.'r •ras : « • •;wu•00. 00! .9 • t` - ra l•4- 3 b ,1. . o.,'n 40TH AVE S o ao 30 I 37 7.5 s45 I //K.33 :Gr a3'SOw a 0 O tj; ..O. o 0 a1+• O (iJ A, 543-15 ./.: <0 m� m� •3 O 1 1U 1 • Oro -0 Ll V. p 75 57 rs� w` v . ' fF N i vy a I� l"r G r• w M y/ % to •• nl 3 - 40 C.i t1 ti 1 (,1 1 E b 5 x1 U N :.t...y,c. 0 1 GS 1 �` 1 , ..4. ! v, 1 •)4. 1• el '� 1 yy V )1 r IA ). 5C; . 1311.N, r;!.• 5.5 7s .3 0▪ 0 r 3. .049 . eco i ..1V 1 _ t1W tb l0 U 7. Z} tr c)-' 1 T '* l• • V 11 a, r'� 331 t3) . site plan - ..:' e I •••••••••. err Peer rare roe. ••w eeieri• mi0044 04040E0 ;_- 1140/ _ale erre Ism era. 144 aur =MM. %weer*. .. ear er.•• w 40.04 .*.►earn. ••••••• 4000 rem p..IeyT 444.7-. t:-.ra.:ai.I:O.••••••i 1:a.‘,.. Spee sia.::.IS. f.•a•ar•Ct ' C $.. IC//r,4M ZSI:P.Cartailm , C)!PI Ie P '.Ir. Cat. 00•47; f :.e. :• .1...irrp w''Tl....apo'nruA• 7••• Jo...IM G S 444.04 Cram 4, VAC. re.r.IW /i9.7arli U paTLirM 5.11*r i4• MT •_'•^•'T ,i.e. a.rP•e••• ryw►t... T «r1G7.-I/eve nae lip lir• .17' ::ern.✓ OA!. !.,.w mine/*Were p.m. m' HT: :f.r, {,.e. ?fI $A *c.v./ ...ow:* jot 1 NUN C.*. i VAC. C. , ?th17 "VANu.rearwr pulp eIDVC wonOI.9. IueNr •IO.C. 4f4 t proem.., %leraY ISer/R&O 10•1•41• s'CAL, ef4 .1AICMic1 s31/1C. .ee•,e O•Oe.M.a1Vis/Y14,•• .•••"+ i=y.Nr, Wt. * e•••••••• ...4,..r...,, 0•L tKe../ •timetp ii-reipurr .&L 41a .•neer ae" 7 Ico...". • • Speciflcations:: 1. rammer Wenn ren et err r fop ••• lam Invernear* for Mr .for r ger serener r beer../. e. es •are. 1. reef► laser 0 re atllele fele r r Nemo ri00 els r ..rear. — error we re w mop aer.rwle•0 _11•. eerrel•l .are_ l tar•► 1lpe rre a/eear re,. r * Wee .111 serer meter r r. /rove•. r r. **leer lir ear•• renal*k grim In .r.r l iletare. ' _.erre- ern mere r ewer re 001 • ala ealrea erre MW~.~ ereel erre.. e/ m ✓ ope a ear art area W meal.. felt. •elp.e. r neer rare rern to rrr11r re repro r at twraalr ale. 1111 raimr r rear. rata. pre rear it. •ter of errUlr isa *Neuer. fertltr. More rt. rear a. el ' r wwrra Leet*. esramopma. tett or rear**. of Orr . leve. alr deer Hr. r orf lire Sarre, r•maw 1.•a1 r :teve meal* r rn ere r war*. are. err* mer rel Meer+ nears ter serer pre taw renk Irma mop ~lire re Ymo remora ra Isere r . lrH r neetlaale. r r rim *.Mere. re Ler.Ir. rat repertory math e• U. weer rr/e D . r▪ emeetwar..r lareelrobette e.4rrar rope apeker err. aeMrer ..aI. •ee.t• el.rlt r.t.r. l rekerremoerr • y, n '.e.lrre. Deer** vele*.. *.mesa. S. 1ererr Nell lit parr err Warr rear e Won 1.4. ••••1 sees U . rime are darn renal. *}ere•• lin ler t► r la err. Wee lir erre ter r rY •terra err Larr. rim lir rimer weer mean as Were d re broan embealaf mil to e dere of ear ~ belt *•non ail -_ever parer a ilii N ee lir et — . atom r leerp are r err m • . ire► r efuel r *erre mope le rue re erawr ✓ r Ire -_--• SIU Ire re real lir lin r Orr r emit. era ere realm te err r Iran. lir vera • lir r M r rent. lir ere r wean Ire ear re erre 4. err M ta_rtl. el.as aerie, to e Err lir re a r err. reek Martis. ear... Orme, romp r w .r feeler a q_I•esa T ••1••e . . ..rale► .aa w.•... W re Morro of t erre. rera re l rl.01 r rerkeerre 1104 `r—et 'tfrrallkwIre t saier•ver lee w re/nee terra lir r rare w r r re erre l r agrm. oMr an err f erg —•• 001 ran lin ere ••••r•••r Sr err rile — Is be earl* ale a1 re terra armor Ira ren .yore.* We felt Is Mabe • • rw r lea **peel alt r *rear 44,.404 r .I* r fel • •ml,rr• W ee all realer *...earl Pre r r rryoet a{ err t•le 0140 140401•10 r .erre 111x. 11••••• sera lar ere. • 00a.. ear. m Mr5.1--*weal r MI.=. rU Y r re lana el ae ✓ neam. rear wens Nosy .Merl is era. '•ear) V. aeon lir re11 a era leee are •.rears. r ..reerWr em* rat. era alirleerne. r W • e afr •ereon err 10_11.1k lir. raw oral ter r e a r reel. W . error ere rel r beet top 1•••*ream.*. per r Ne reevemr errs re erre. rrerr vele. •rater ani Is Werra ef re W ✓ em rear. a f/top Ierrr.reweave lar ere le Me ave VIII Is eller Is Is rare ewer are of ~• or rraialrrave Woe a. name ere awrerar ere•ee green /e esin mower .tree. err err ea ear r top aria. M redeem W tem r 40000 or e erre errrre lir •t4•• eeer= fern feeleneme refer. tart•.•. m r reMneme erear r~w. e. Warr re• ern w•raey4 rW tier. 00.0 r eew•rwem erre re rem• ✓ am rel r M •w r rammer ea em••mer a► •en0m• far. ••••tlop. r. ••mama• 0001. Here re ttaaier r rears rear poor. ✓ arerrleerr. r pmW r r arra. air ei• el. erre r all area Molt Is r re re roe r will Is lea Mawr lir re I.trer term• lir erre Mr Ne r rete. U. r r real •••1•! p*l r •u air as leera a eerear troa. erb•wr earl Is .•mre,M. :r▪ rarlYrep •*peer err r lir• W •11 earl no. r•Ir e0 r rear pr r ear bees r a. •:Prem. norm r eer. r .raltwlre. •mean... rm... ran r reran r► 11. rearm.*•. all erre re err rah • re raw /.Mame. ✓ et err reran re .mann ornebee art H.ea ear flat roue* a la. *earl. alt nrlr rale nor r..na r re n. w M re Iarrr eteemrrm wrearWlr op rare • ear aurisp r r _e•lr r W r• roe alis 11. •••••1liaear lee err rra00 r M lir 040100110117 a re r roar.*. borer Ire. .r. ern rem wore remora 0001•404044•0 gm mere. peer aarrr• w..re a• verse tart earl* lea Y *r re are carr a ea inPrommerealme mart. air reamer arr. here* rr•aror11nap falrr error. far Mre•M a. err raw. awe.err. beemeleek 1 *resew re ere Ip ws r mere. erre ereprre . were. tt a a e.aeerre Ile ere of *men*reef ye: Om r..rr1 arra • U r r top. b •.a A ae► real*. e• - leers• er1.M rrlaa r •arrear M ear M re 0004. If. r •1t 5.-i ..erne. err. •top. r *1140 Mel. •• .ser is. a sera* art Is arra. M a a r eerier rarer. reek e ▪ anneal. pr r 54.5. ver tlwreran me erre reerelles roarreeer t oIra f 5. era W tame r ..err r Ne are r Ire rem. ✓ fee_. M a lir4 e. aro .rare 111 (era. arae r rimer arab roil Is me armee ✓ rat r reale..• ere enemer -erre lir. re Mal ere Ir ea eafra r ▪ eeamme+ astler. ea le I1/46 remota a peers_ err Mer r* orf r.•i, rwwo•a e s ter err pe..•mt K err. MreteM. at. ' • ell re _weer welter r rr. re. Irma ..erre. reel peer re er► err. r err rem is. air. lir lir r 51 serer "x5.5.14' r ser are r.rrrartr..•r lir lir r reeler. li r errata* li r raw. lir W• M. alte i••e .aM 0010. rear ..elle top re ear r =mew. be rye frto.wire w.. Nee bp pen lee r .-*rear moon yowler ear r• merle err. r— t.. yell re r • a►i - .••••••••••••.4 :•T •••.•D r•• • •• •I!._.•••• • 19.••••1.1 a NN.* T•'•••••-.. .� '••••••...41 Mae". I! ••..W r%•,Yu•� ' j..-••j..-••••••••••7.•s.v •4 �- 41=�' �II•.•MD ••••••••••••••••••6• A •��•.•F rrr...r llfy i .41 SECTION B SECTION A •C•w•f.•" a l.• n• Iu.r?w4 -w••10Sc4P6 AftrA f.....••••.rwAT•oVSt ;' �.• a•P, .7D••rlta• 11•7•• •P ?T•• . S. 71 S. 128th Street •ww•• i—•.1. IENOLVAI • I ••. I' ••+1.+� 1lI••'�7.V .t r.••• •. A.•.•7•.T. MEMc , fie • SECTION A • RII 1 3 _(v $1.4e a •.A• •• . ••w:.t'•'•1•S ' yut. f• Tr .: hwt �.� •II��f *P.•'•+ •taN. T• •IMN r.•t7»p 1•••••- • ,Q)9 . oq, it :3' i •.rr..••I •.••"re•..•7 SECTION A 1 N. :iSLftL11 I 1 I $iO °N o 1Y` ,„ •� S I o poeF11 �� o°o: O •eaoL i••f. r t 0�1 !tQ pD�OpOp Q=p1 .. /`tt t CTION B •r•r•1 � Landscape Planting Plan •-.tl..,) ••:r — 4• • T. br-1 •••••1..,.• •e•• r•/7•.y .'4N4 1",• k.+N -/ r••ra. r r)nc• TNN7./ "t• rr ••. •w • rr•hrr „t••..T I.47 v/JwAL .•.. •••••••••••• • VIP if l }r 1. • • • L-1. 2 4...• J•,I. 5D l a i t.r..r llwnmr Gull Cwntrr Clutr iofc s1. • 1� wr. • w.c • 51a•TaC 1;i' y 144 �� IiIYL'll�f ?lip ,•1, ' .._ c J i y IS. 1. . 1 N 1•i r,..... •• ••.f 1S4 51 .! • � , 11.1..1 TIN P01/11 C..' A. .1 :it I'll l IA00044 1.41. 4 ! t uvlrlawuOVAL l,r ♦ t AJIf•ONr of VICINITY 1'tE SJAT1 EXISTING . Gs: PARCEL NIJk +: CONDITIONi. SITE AREA LANDSCAPE :.PARKING • '!S Is va 411�1`31wrw .�yY- rt _ .e. . _ z 42C3_..uC 03 PERMITS. L9 3- 58 L94•• .,�18 I1io.• . SF l-ThOYEE 5.�':.LLS . `K %TkAIL R STALLS , • • • • • • ........................................................ t; 4-10-H 61-0,11‘4 FEW- Ixr/fi1/4r-e4:V L ,lt%.;-o11 CL-Ige?, SOUTH 128TH STREET OF, ( --: - • avi 6.11\TE/, • --, , - 4g, -IL_ -..\-\.„ ,(I \ . E.-4_12ft- 1,47 /42 4,1 przoviCil>( 51-RIP k4,city'r a->< IC/1-1N4 Cr ■ I• • • N„... • ..".'..—.1,11.012,.4M.14rna,lui,d These plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department for conformance with current ity standards. Acceptance is subject to errors nd omissions which do not authorize violations of dopted standards or ordinances. The responsibility r the adequacy of the design rests totally with e designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to hese drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will require a resubmittal of revised drawings for subsequent approval. Final acceptance is subject to field inspection by the P uutrc Works utilities inspector. Date: / By: '�.� r�-�' " (�� — ccp .tt11"M mil PLW L4'7 128TH .STREET P.1.. = 262' x- 5TR4 P t-,-(,t _t_ /\)AJ/ \'' Ki t 747 �r l These plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department for conformance with current sty standards. Acceptance is subject to errors �nd omissions which do not authorize violations of dopted standards or ordinances. The responsibility r the adequacy of the design resit; Totally with e designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to hese drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will require a resubmittal of revised drawings for subsequent approval. Final acer1tance is subject to field inspection by the Puunrc Works utilities inspector. Date: BY Cc,. ;4` r t-r ;H -flohl LECIALLDigt, LOTS 4ANL, 114 THROUGH 35, IN-. 13IVE, BLOCR REPLAT OF . Of RIVERSIDE INTER J,4 TRACTS, PLAT RECC- "J:D IN VOLUME 13 OF PIJVI , PAGE 36, 1. WASHINGTO LAQIET THAT PORTION O AID LOTS - OFO COAVE1ED TO KING COUNT': 1/ DEED RECO ,ID COU HERET P AUDITORII.S 'IL E NO. 1004994, RECOli OF SJ PURPOSES. _ ij:rInr 11:241----1-111Li ,:Ti; L1 11-•" "RIVEPTOH", A .:yRDING TO THE ANG COUNTY, :22,23,2A, AND 25 UNDER FOR ':OAD C-1-1A1 N. UN FE-NC W/ NV--E5E7 WI V-E- *.)c1rv-i_41-7E..P cAo-b /\l- Li\t-1 1-11.2 ICA L. zti" FAY Ha I.P13-ons8 11 -- ------ -ft P i CAL- 'i'(NlCA\I�I,I�TNT �►XT�r�� 4-00 WATT `'IrT/N HAL J PE 4;s?' 1901.5 .:3 w /+'tcL e 6-?.4-Ht 214 . S17 6 oft x-rUk . e-• tGl1( L 0-JAI M U N K- F L W/ ,,-ED TK-uVEG GUK 6)A L /'' -F-A` —a 1-- (r)IG'\ L,. ovv- 6,v-4-147H17 i 1 G Z29L Ifs' 11 °LA fi 1 (i P.�.. = 125' i{ Mama tam. ssj 1'i' r • l r.f K1u 1� LOT ! r rte. r -�NO ' 4 C,115. 1 /!J x ✓, 2.4) q 7, Wf. --r-r. ' -1 I '�f� WA`r "r4 / i=1Xi U Iu1PV ;rte L 1s -1, . . • . . . . . .. . . , , . • — ,„.,.,,, :,$..,,,,,,,,;,:;. ,...,.. ,...,,, . . Z-- 6- 17---0 --- ric_f\t„ / — y ,-- • x I /,\. 1. / Cs- 511- •:; \ 6 ti 0.4 rj DE 1,-6-t-i-Q\16.- \ \ • • „ ,/' -rTrIo1/41,\L-i.4-1-11" rlx-f-I-We.. (1.: / )( • +Oa vsiAT-W1-ri\t, HAL-1Pe- . \ --f(r. I ,.//R1 P'01.-• (,:r-tc_i_u'--1C--1 \ / I J*640 Nici/ NO 1-14 e 6-,4-115L-Vf / ON -,46,G1.< i / ?C = 125' Otworml imwaitrw•mmmomaa•OPMateenolsral toorosal imorarow /\H Zd— • CJ • t/ i -'"-\ ) (_-,, \ c ...... - --Is I / !4,-..e.M.:4-j1•3.1-/!41/444.44,4-.444,4.',449,.: it- •• • ": I • - • • • 't I NO >("1-E-K--101<- FrAstr--0- LOT LM-'11-TP 0:7-0 C)F. /4.-42 Mg4-11-6 F: I Y.-IA ; ff, • ••, • 1 1/4.41 4 4,4 i •:•.1 ' • 4 - wrlov'tati 0 Vtistic .11 ......_ ih ; 0 ....„. g ft, • \ ! ' A 1 It j 1 1 6-, • • , . i • • — 1 tt,:t., i „.. - "4.;':$ • ,........ , ....- - i 1 ) Y....* It`, • .‘5 PL = 94.45? ,,r rT.PZInn7a�1Ma, rt.t....1•T'Imna.Krommottmatatt 7's • /, 1'...-;•1 1 •t •,. •: • •• .• • • • , , • y , • . t R. r trtord.l. ftly P'f atL, ; TUKI.NILA P Li C; g.I ;-; ." ? SOUTH 128TH STRI • dW g •2' Ji SOUTH 128TH STREET p STATE Or WAsHIN. CiTON LYNN VVIL':_ A /4,: (,(',• ±iii CIF,RTINCATI. NC. Al t; These k1(ns have been reviewed by the Public Works Department for conformance with current City standards. Acceptance is subject to errors and omiss ons which do nct authorize violations of adopted standards or ordinances. The responsibility for the adequacy of the design rests totally with the designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to these drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will r subsequent ap� ov,,al of revised drawing • Final acceptance is subject; to field inspection by the Public Works utilities Date: c7r By: 1fi—, froi/J7 2f ( '1v* --r' 1) s6.e. Dg7:4- /L, .`; ti• ; • Trir.,fftre7.4.MT.V.M7771.artIMT-7.1.tM'PTITT•irr'75577•M'7771,,,i -Ifl,t)C1;;:Ni ON Wi.“.i;-Td t:e (1, I TAT OF 0 Vt'ir-::14. r. jj.IVIA", .. t LYNI,d ‘611iJit\4'. ';'itt.ilN i is 1 i CE;RTINC/VP: 'i.,C.,. 1.'10 ,..v, ic.i These i4 ns have been reviewed by the Public Works Department for conformance with current City standards. Acceptance is subject to errors and omiss:ons which do not authorize violations of adopted slandards or ordinances. The responsibility for the adequacy of the design rests totally with the designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to these drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will require a resubmittai of revised drawings for subsequent anprow.,,!. • Final acceptance is subject to field inspection by '-,..•,-, the Public Works utilities inspector. f '4 Date: 6 rr" By „ . . :'''■ :. :•-', : . . '.' t el ''!„ '', • • • . , : !M.: ; • .:.‘i . i‘ .': , • ',' • - - - ....---.....-........-- -...-: i • 1...NWO.:./..7 Y A !Ft :I Irit ::::11: rl..•.::!;!rt.", .i: . . . ; ' . ' , . • . IAN N W Lt. tA,.,! I U31,'N. ASLA ..:1.1 ■;F;, R t;I:rnift!..o 1.."..Nt.io", ,N,,:i 4; TI.,.7 ,,... 0 rr itz 1,.,:t21-; t.;wifv.iut.t.ityFtl.i.A.r7 Llf,ti YE !iv; , : ;5■:, ... I 0 . .. V:::):Alk.":":ri T.,..„,,;,,,f,:41M1(iti !.''!•! L.c; .1r 7 C) • 7;.7.7.!7'"7.':If'r','""7•7'7'.'''Y'.:.'.7.• • p.o.,.,./7 4,f C 0," A.. hi,e.-7-/ .01.1 s6e.. 7-J'- -'--• I . - i ',., -.••'.' ,... i- ', „. :,I ..-• ". . .. , . ,.'...' i . • 1 ::''. , • • . , : . .. ,.• .... .' . , . ... .. ...- -. . . 1 .. J • ,...,:: ,::: .,..,.. •(:::... ,1::..!..,..:,....i:...,,,..,.,.4.,„ . , , ri4 • . ,':', .,... ...!.: 1-1,1; ',,','-•• ra' ti:6 • •k CMS NO. 6103ACTV+•2:ts' Si; • Noirtt URRIGATION PLAN t-lz/ 61 TX-x,`/ CNlNC /',cocE5 4, -r, J, ,,CIE of TRteS /-71•4t-IL) NCr NTION PLAN T/- izooT'rz, of fix/ °2,TIti/c7 —TzE� 7`/c CN/ /2)COCE5 (3, (A// ^/ JR'P f 7/zees f7/a1 -U 1.7/3 TKANCri�S. ONINIM 1111•110/ ISOM f6N c -7 7/ p C,_. .1 *NOM ••••111/6 71\ '1 11111•111 MERIN. con7,1101...) 77JC 5I ros/ COW* ••••■■••■••• 49",K7.077/1/41 ,.... ?•:,` 1 k ,• (74 r .4\1■) VA, L 17- ti ‘' 1 cz,,,,; L.P■ P.Is 4 ' ,v, - -.4 ■ I), 0.. III it0.6,0 g . .21,, pP ? AB95 -cuysw\up. coucx_kc \NoR14.5 , • • • • - • • 13; pz T • —4-- • WATE R 6OU C} SRASb BALL V4J.VE FSSCO AMY DOtl !- Q-ECK VANE ASSEMBLY . UNION f±[�. 3{ F :CCNNECTIQN DETAIL , v.,,r :tr,!etVJ y} • O C K I N A COVER .�^ � � w,+:w.i.tik�.it�,;��,w� ' {.. a y'1^uy. ;r.,,. ..w: x�r�l:i�:�.;:.L�:yU'rii,ee+ur(a 1OULE GµEC No (SCALE I`x9` CzALV. NIA toR RaTaRS i P G FOR srMAY =1 1 C • • •••• • • • , • • 1 — PROTECTIVE VALVE 00X dr-44EiDULZ tD PvC NiFirta 15F2A.e...5 5r...14EDULE e49 PVC UNION pvc MALE MANIJAI. DRAIN QUICK COUPLER DOUBLE CRECK A88EM8LY AFTER Am, • *la 4 gar • **IX di" •: 110'. 24' GRAVEL &MP' (4,5 alESIC YARD MINI1121) 1DOU5LE CHECK Ae.)5M512( • NO &CALE rop-tir OR ROTARY 43PRINKLER, I4EAP CsALV. NIPPLE fOR gcrioKS ( PVC r o sriccY HeA0e,) 02c.-.PULE 40 PVC UV ELL • 1 • Nis* C-ame ago pvc.NipeLE Valve•Schedule: VALVE a G.P.M. SIZE / o. ,;),. • , 1 -,- •) v, 2,' /t. /7.)" ' z" ,[7,,,T,.. ,) i• • i" ,i / OUPL E R Vaive.Schedute: VALVE a G.P.MH SIZE Materials Legend: CATALOGS SYM. DESCR1P1 ION Malmo* WINNE. gend: DESCRIPTIO p,,di /A/ /3 1) ,A1-57/C Sp" /fr../ /.< 1- E. c.4rrent y s1-loarcis. subject to Nors and omissions wh;ch ithorize violanns of adopted standards or (wok.: T respo ibility for the adequacy of tho in ri.3stc; total with .ho designer. Additions, or rem ns to these drawings after h; 'ato will voi; this acceptance and will a resubmit:1 of rovised drawings for sub.:-..•.:;uent approvh: •• Thaf . 1 acceptance is su: RAD i.„..„ inspecn by By: J VA% Z_ V. I-) 7. '7.- • 1, ---1 Zi 7.9 1-17,1,77 7-.17 S • STA777ici. (04.- 0 6-1,477) ": 1/3C2 J-) LI 17/zA, ?A, //' Ps -0- S VA pi/ G 11-7 "J g - • - :id, t-;.• /Jr, 1 //s/e- , li/C.111 Aro 4K-7 fr.jVf_ I 3 c . 1/ // 1/ 1/ •■•■••■•■•■■•■•••■••■•••••••7••••••••••••■1 • _•-•.,■,,,,fik•• ■••• 4 . IAN %WW1 HORN &A.S.NIMATEN LANIXCAPg A110117E01= LYNN WILLIAM NOUN. ASIA hZISTIaLEU LAtilAiCeg AbtO I Ina 017c )0128 Clan:11Y LA ts DeJvr, SW SUITV. 103 TACO ILA. WAS4IINGTON 2Lt • 582- MAIL POUT Menu Box COCO TAC0114,11Msaii ACTON V146.0067 ,,24rrent slarloarcis. 1.; subject to errors and omismcns whch ck.-• •ithorize violatns of adopted standards or oreir Tt, respo ibility for the adequacy of the &iijn rk;sts total with • The designer. Additions, d..7,iions or rem rs to those drawings after th:;.-; late will veil this t., _-Acc•.aptance and o resubmyal of • rovised drawings for approvfi acceptance is inspect9n by Pub;if ,rks '•Li;.44 • RAD 1 csy. ••• CA/— 1 r • 1/,4,/_ v.- •• • A Upe.. V-4 Tice. s7;4771,/. • ; g .;; PA:2e4;, 4.i. -■ 4;:. "..■ t1/4- W.0.-••• *M. • LINN VALIUM HORN & AS:MIMS . kr LAP•OtiCAPC Aar-arty:rum 1-11 Bat PLAMP4h0 • LYNN WILLIAM How ASIA i:GIblINXU LANDSCAII: AkCI in= 0 rvicx gia211 GiLAVULY LW. Dv t SW Sum itn T4cokkwAsiiireCTON ak.582-6064 MAJ. Pt Orvic,i: Box 00W7 TAccomA. WAsaumciot4 ULK06. COW '0= CLUCK- OLIPLINGI: VALVE- ID0T411, HO 4.',CALE PROViIDE A 24' EXPA:461a4 LOCe FOR CONTROL. UM NO SCALE' PROTECTIVE VALVE E•OX PVC MALE ADAPTER 4 PIPE PVC W. ELL GALV. NIPPE 056 MAO 41VMNIM11) E CLARY 6PRINKLFF NO &CALE NO SCALE 15c8b aiALv. Fait gerraRS ( Pvc r OR sre-AY HF-ev7a) • OCHE* PULE 41.0 rc 90° i•xls" 6C.I4ED(LE MC .NIPPLE • ...E"OP-11.4P SPRAY HEAD 4 SOTARY SPRINKI.FIR 1-441D No &CALE PVC TEE Fe.11015ER VALVE MARKER 2° CL.-Ib0 Pc./C SLEEVE (LENGTH A5 Fe.ECUIRED) ION 3/41 ANGLE VALVE afcgiMESurlu) NO SCALE ■ • • . • • t •• fr7"-------6CHED4JLE -40 PVC TEE 24° GRAVEL. &ZIP 2 CUBIC tfE1 MINIMM) Au-caul-1c DRAB .stn." • h; 3 ' 'y" • `:� '`d. it • ';��<"wlu �'i -r�C 11..1 "J,rvL`�.'J �:��al �•.,• �k�r'..:.42`iiL� �rli�: v ,t/ D - $ ,r47. D / / x,.4T/ -47 ^ / e b S' /q l:i r ye- Gl 0Pe-) : S' &le.. 7-----.8CHEDULE 40 PVC TEE dotes: 1. Irrigation design bn ;scarf upon ;44440 Ala Agri wets - Gov lbs. static water pressure. S0e1. C /V /t_ 2. All equipment to. bo installed per state :.tal local 0G;' 3. Install manual drains at all low points or mainline, looatione. See matcr? :la legend for type. 4. Provide 18" of cov =.'r for mainlines, 12" . 5. Install all heads u .3 ng marlex awing joi.. - , 3 o: c: ° p. 6. Drawing is diagrasun;io in nature, fielc; ,::. juatr:..:1tr. required. 7. Do not spline cont '. wires outaido .of bow- :- . B. Provide a 24" expECic•n' loop for all con:.• ::•.1 win. , r.r valve box. P. Use "Dri- Splico" connectors for wi;_` 10. From controller r uca spare yellow wirot to 11. Contraotor to provj.. r owner with exact "e -built" pl. • 12. Contractor shall :,upply all power :nd •otr:: sir, : controller. 13. Contractor. 8hal' ;apply all 6leevir °::, war installation and c , ~ , entire point of f:• neoti':'.i r.. heads, piping, ,<; wiring and d'. ins installation as rs:-►u•- . 14. Contractor shall all foae and Ctin r.. permits. 15. All sleeving shta..:. Schedule .eo PVC y _. unlc, 0: shown. 16. Use common ditor. ; possible. 17. If any diaaropano . are oncounl:o ed, i': '' :!,!aen t'' *a• onsite conditions 6r4 the drawinilra the . °rndaoa�,' shall be contacted Frier to any work or r{ isionn . 18. Adjust all spray nt,�r.7.sa and heads to eprily within pi areas. 1 To Air 4/ CT C 1 1Z fz/ t.:4,2-2 a A,/ 1.,? R, c/c7 /v.,c(7 te, 1 o ',Apr 67) iii _ n hod 1,4 1 z.,,dod upon gal Sfr.,: -water with 3" pressure. Sote. a/ 1..):1 installed par state loci aicv, at all low points orh raainlincs, taririls legend or type. for 'mainlines, 12" merlex awing 3 in nature, fiela ,, bu . wiree. outaido .of u.i:n loop for all aon.1 wirc,P.; oonnaotors for :• spare yellow wirou, c-2:1-ne t owner with exaot p1 ;,..upply all power CAnd aouzir •Ln oach or Li Pply all a leevin,70 wnr entire point of 4-::->nnecitif::::i r.-: •••-*/n, \''.''.".-;..:3, wiring and dr.-:ins f o...-- :4 .-- • -.Act° 1 '•." all f.aes and o'.'.,:nAn • Schedule .ao PVC un1 ot::•••• -die° k.• posaible. - Ora ancounl:lorad, C' • 0:1,the drawityje, the ad ler to any work or tr,—Asionn. "r':flt)11 and heads' to aprily within p-ing A : ' • • • • , • .• RECEIVED APR 2 7 1995 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS • • ••• ' ' • 1. R°I.M.A Y44 *t421.111'N • n10,4 /S4 . . •••••••■•■•■•Ve• CHUCKED • ■••••-;., 1:3 AT Jas Na L-2 SHOMYS' • • „ j ,4z awecveto: with ; !e. c / tog-tic; r • .n g:7100/11,L ;No.:TA / 4.1s state loofa )0ints on mainline, xitaord ir typo, 1, 12" lat6=1 :ng joit: 3 10, pLe08, fielu jtietIti,.,.. be. io.of vil bo;:y.::7. ill ctontl wiro w;..n each for wi;:r, .pli:.- i wirou, one to ,ic.. ..ive ii xttot "-built" pl... owar fAnd utoutinrj for taleavin,-T, wr,l,:r -nor nt of r.::).nnecti tt- --..::wn, and drins fo. r4 ..)leto and PVC 10!. rad, been the 3._ndeo:: nv'itteot rk or to aprciy within piaing RECEIVED APR 2 7 1995 TUKWILA . PUBLIC WORKS . . .• .• • • ..-,-n!ronorweros) • '.• Aginammummiamm====v; J.- , DRAWN • :•! '0 Vf 71-te)".1./■.1 CHSCKED 0.1...11Wa OHMUTO • r t'• _ E •'�. i 1 • 1 1- • ' . 4* • 1. t ' :•••-• • • +/L./I.` •,.. 1,•pQ {0°0,, e; '4!! .111t4 Q rTh Street n+ 17, (7).: • ( . Irt)„, t,1 -414- AS:i) •?:-‘;` -....,. s .44,...1' , • •',V. ) • ,./. '3"--•:;-•-:- • . $',7.-=-,- .....;----• -- -..- • ---..:----,\:- .74 >/,'. . • ,Q4...,.1)''',k4g i )........,„•, 1,..„....„' I '• '''' :I (;) . ••... 1' ..... ' , • ... .. Zl—\— • '.\ i 1 .1:1: ) ! r ,-". -....... '''''''••••-**.„„..L___•Ar ,,,,,, . , _ • 1r ' 'r. It• '41- ••• r 'f.L • -Y4 V71741M1172=121a15.irST.M7111/1.F.7,rrnln.'arT'xITIV:77.76....M.Rr71:71.11X-....-:.'n7r775:'?: .... ... ';',7er7t=rPst'ar.vtlxvir.Irt.lissw,„ rovntrfigili • / •'• • ." rs. — • ." • ` • • • - ' - .--..• , .. .57-.."1•-•---.:-\,-- -^,..7.-r--.\----,-.----.7,, .... I...- . i'--. (1 4' ( C ''' 7: 1. : t -,; t , • ).0 '.- 4 i 7 ., 1 --,. ( ,. , ... /..,I i .j • ,'0 '' J - • 7 '-\'-' ,. - ' .),,.-7` -7N'. ' ; .,/ ,! ! , • . .' . ,- . . ..-4'A. ,7.,, 7. .,: '• \ " - ' ' ,,' • /,' . ' I 0 , ) -T '''- -; . -7 . ;-;477,,-71 ' .,''''''';', ; . • 4,- \st ,-..< 1 ...... I I ,.,..• t 1 .... - i I :...... , r 1.... k I 1,•,. , • .\;:y.,•,..% • ,r 7 .... I... 7.-- 1‘ :...)6.77-r: fr---/ 7( c) ,.../ .11. F-',...-:, / s j 1 _3) 1 -.. , . ,...; t.,":•-y-....•t ..; ''' '''''7.'"i' I . • i • ' ,,„.....,..,.‘i.k ...._.... ,„......•. i . 7.,....- i, .....,.-..:-.-..-"••-•-,------it.;,......-.1..4.:-.r..i.,4,-:'',..1:7 : ). . ■• . IS. ' I ',../.0' . { , ),, • --... ...- ; i ''• '..r.'".1 - - - - - 4. 1 . ( , 71 • . •, , I,.'' . '1•F7-.Q.1.' ('' • 4,4,1; 1 • (..'; i'' ,:' • ..‘ • ii: I' 1 •••'' ..)'N*1 ' 1 ' ' i••••• . 7 , i 1. sr,:r-TiON A 4. 1. /J • • / ( i • . • ��- � {'. . CT!ON A L ''' •..k SECTION 8 I, i., (, ,'. --, r';;• f; ' '. ( ; t --'. ......._. . ,____...---.--,H 4 I •' • --- 54 4/.--\ i (•7‘!:s; 777.-- . ,. Landscape Planting P!an -\ SECTION 8 / 1 • , ■ • I I P il I • • • ' ‘ • • • . '--e' 1 . .' i • ,N, ' g• - -4. •-.-, ! ., • k.::,))) . •. „.„,..• . 1 II ‘,c .• .„ , ',. • • . * ,,, , ! 1 . •••'' ', r-' ; L•szfis., . S ', i.e'''' . •• • 1 •-,‘''' • , ..„ . • i 1 , , .! ' .. , ,,,,,Y7:•"' • , ',...-e- .. • '' ; .,;.'",A, : ... '..'''.....A4 ...' ......- . , . . . . ':. I `,....,,',., k, ', . .• ,...' 2, ‘,..1-',, . .7i; - • y,. • - • , • . , • • • • • • idscape Plantin ; . . • .,C; ./ , • , • „0""( l`t (", ? • , • , — ; e ' \-`d • • \ ;../ • •' •41 1044!"4":"':73-7 • • • .4," ptp!, .• p • ••• sP'.3 • y 1,1 P•e1^- •`;'`,; t P'• —1•1' T' • ') V %4 •-•/ • • • - . _ . • Pan i wrineromoverownommummuavosowneenor n • , ■.• ' , • i" ' ••/1 .,,„ , . , • t ( 01, • . • •,," • (.1.1 /../t I • -•- •,.k.;t V -11 i'44' 1 It:f I • tit.: • • YL/Iff ••••;i"4.)... 1- •••( et; j" / t!..• • rif • 1-;:t ,••••; f/t• I I 112r:1 1)4 ext. ir1t r'e I 1 Ft'-'I 004, l•-•.-• I . 111.• ale r2001 )5." • ' et- :1;st4e.C, -To c•:.„1•1„-Pe... — o? i•-t" • 'el ?nil-leo 1. P4ent -.kW skiet•c6.--e-ri 1.1400.-cw 1 , • 1...° mot • • V'Att-'1-111\.' e — • • • • •".""Wc1;11:i ' \ • .? s;. • to. 4.)H e-->? cJfIfr (7120.01196 [11 -rv dr..tirt.1 cor-te oe• , vNel Port' L L.& . t4-r-1 (.29, • • - , . • 'TOP r:e r-cor • • {� Cone o' HANo r Fg1pv 1°N( Cam• U f' fp.. ;Jtj 0 •�ili.i1iL).i•.,r'",Lti jv fl >�•� ;o '/ '1FUri c4(14.10 -44' T" as 1,L.Al -11j ►%U ryur�. • • A 1. Specificafons: Contractor shill obtain all pormitti roquired for any work ars sociateO 1.1ndtzcap i and irr. iclation work t>.:, sh( 2. Verify locations of all utilities pt work as required, upon approval of 1 design consultent(t) and /or owner. •Verify location of all easements pr' Bring all adverse conditions, nn so< to LA., architects and/or owner's at corrections /modifications. Contractors shall conform and regulations as required by the govef this project occurs within. Scopo of work shall include all sat, 'and related items necessary to acco soil preparation, berm fill matori. grading of topsoil, placement of specified plant mate ?ri Vitamin B -1, staking and mulching, protection, rartintenanoe, guar:snton material, clean -up, debris removal, or incidental to complete the work ;Land. Contractor shall call Unc ergr !Service prior to reny work. 'Should any errors or conflic ;drawings or specifications t,nd on r ,cont. shall immediately notify th+, OtJnes Jr or to rrocaediilct wo 3. !?'.[?br vjationt5 for interpret t.,or o' o.c. °ort center, ,grs•«bniled !a hur.I.+• sprd. -.;spr:,Aad, rtin. �riintr�tr;, 7 ^* andacap/3 4. 11 groundcover !than be p.l ten tR•,ri u ;shown below: 1 U Y � 5. ;Plant as per details prov:i d nd , and j !LA only. Bring any proposed chnng e to changes. Arenas of standing wa t. IA's attention. 6. Rototi 11 the existing soil to LOp:aoi' plrtce' lent, in all gx'oundco\, ,hake o:� ' all rocks 2" diameter an -way lttix topsoil or approvoe.,, egu bed and Rototi 17 i 2" layer of topsoil. Then place rt thus adding a total of 4" of tops more than the minimum 4" depth of to be flush with the tops of cur . ru (Aa uof', )4A. t' 846 -2.1571 . In the planting of the trees, sh groundcoNror•s thEg following top>.oi ,wr►iwc', tojrioil . !nixtUree ' shztll bcs ri *- specified topsoil with the bc,lar, ' crt.,cs ad. soils, with all rocks 2" t.hel :s.i doiln toci thn Dispose of „L f. L. Speci ca on : 1. Cor r(,Ctor shall obtain all permits :Ind pay . ny fees 1cluirec1 YOr any work associ:i\_ed with thtl icoldscapo and jrri(1rttion work as fthown, 2. Verify locations of all utilit:,.'is prior to riy work. ,',ctjust work as required, upon approval of the LA, other appropriate digs ign consultant (s) send /or owner. ,verify location of x111 easements prior to arty work. Bring all adverse conditions, as soon an possible, to LA, architects and /or owner's attention, prior to corrections/modifications. Contractors shall conform and comply with. all regulations as required by the governmental agencies( , e. h? ch r-hi6 project occurs within. Scopo of t.';ork iiht- 11 include i"t11 nat•t.:ritxl:s:, labor, equipnent, 'anii rG_latt:d items necessary to accomplish t;'1,.:! subgrF^.C,E? and soil preparation, beryl fill materials, plrtcc?!ment hnc grfi ini;' of topsoil, place:Ltitnt of specified plant 1t'iateri ls, t"t!''trl:i_. i`1.,^1':'", Vitamin B -1, staking, and mulching, Appropriate protection, maintenance, guar :;ntee and replacement of mart mtttfirietl, clean-up, debris r_' ` ovml, and any it enn nf'.c+' r'Sr9.ry or incidental to complete the work mhos+n and np -,;oi ;" ie . land. Contractor shall call Underground FJt_i1_i ._inn ;..,o^ptor service prior to Any work. • Should. any errors or corfi.ic,t?s be ''treir.e-?l"1t 1:.•oa'`w mn the !drawings or spec{ .'icationw eAnd. on 1.4. to conditions, ~: ,an. immeC:.io.tely notify t'llf= arc:"titec'.: areilor• o..tr, r , prior to proct?oi inc; i .:h work. 3. Xr_tc•r_':•:i.t:t :Lonr> for in4erpretr£t :.Ol"t O.C. '=,.:J11 center, ^.,r)- !n"h.'L1 ied !r burl, °:1C''., clonL. t-`f7'1�'_`t ..n r, p1:c''�t.r"":ip;lti7'i {.i n•:i'. .,•v(•.•, _, !'J t`.�"', .7 \.. ,r:r;'l h':. ,. <.'r .:t:.'.:1 wr'a .n • -, \.. ;•„ n tat , ld'l i. • �t.t;,. li'r ,:l• t.l�_I1.�'ltlt.? ",, - 4. :k11 {,'rounctcover nMall TK1 p1tn'itt i t ?sii T'C ' i fi1C; ri* l'S•f; , shown below: 5. -Plant as per details provic d, adfl .1sxtmf n s will ;->0 !'!y the 'TJ. only. Bring any propoaod chnng . i to L.\4 , ttMf ttoo pror BYO c%•:ttngos . Areas of standing watrir " 114`d1 :?'? C±irouah': i :o Attention. 6. '.<<f�LC11_'��i_i. C!ie, existing i+Os.1 to t.'3 C'i(!•p`t:ti'? of 6" •rtY':1 .,'_" to % ?.i1!%' ,<.Gp:.tJa -- p,kGri-;.!lic ?l1_.,: Yl :r.__.,. Cfr'd'tlYICfCOti^wc piznting i"}. Ct " -. :',•7;"� --:i -: }+:<....c.t U:°)'. <111. •c,c?Ci 2' { tt;t r _ :1.n 12't C; . '7)1,J) r'`(` '<si e-',-02-.°11 3-way is K zoplxo or a_porovx'tc'. Oqu, in t'i.rioo now ClHce,'.;' r bee. ah 1 :' acgl .1 1 n1. thtY l:: a- axv1��$- ^.::t -. t'G.r -r- riQLf:J`i:..' 1 _C3 , ,2" layer r of topf';•oi1. Then plac a :,'!no'yrhor 7tr lr >.yif'` O'' `•:oo? got• , , tiltit''.t Gadding ivi toti.1 of 4," o.{. op:'�oi1 • Some r ,1r Acin k :iv �. ';9 t.: ✓...'^f9 more than the minimum 4" depth of topsoil, a.tt ;umt is requir_ r, , to be flush with the toys of curbs, otavina, ':si'flf:t a7_',n, etc... ;Taroll.. •e+t-kfrct -L. 1,01 .st40fAC.i'Vftts2 F5Y h t..^t_o p, i.! 4 , ';q5+6-7/1. In the planting or_ the trees, shrubs and 1 gallon can q o ndcoversi• thh - ollowircq topsoil mixture shall }a<:s used. -ve 6 topsail mixture shall doe Ya total of 75% of the abaves specified topsoil with the halanae tieing 25't: of the onxuite. w tth all rocks 2" ttnd larger 2',omavtad . Mix. thu.s.t riolls together. Dispose of NJ.l L ro7111'tjrlinq unused existing soils;, on site if possible. -- J__� _•.._._ .._i ..a.....e- 1.a ....,.,.,.a .,..d'1.. .. A ate. ti� + +.,.. .. ,il . , "tl CO:. - "� .!. it ?!:. y7',• �'�t.t �_ .,. <�f. .. r. rf '� 1'3 '.'1f` • r'< 14, 'rl ut hctor -=2K-?"1. 1 oe.n 'our t Y1007 .\r c - r -t i•' 'r o • .1' , - -w i.' . ,. ` y 't t... (.ro '47040-s. ri: r-' , • .rho n ofi 1''i`f g1'i :Y\ z. • ;11.l Y i•tid Cinpe ' 1 pt x-m' t e !Z t1 i 1+ n • r. OCC1.1 .. 7 •• .� lr. • CIY,":,:',;)Ct A.G.'. or S„ ry. ‘: con': .-. not huilaings anci .e1.1b.!7titt.mi<ma, te,,N ,Itrnctor ■ all !„-..Innt A•e 211-1(0.1 bogin nil jt ifrio :Oeip C eo.c o -nd corr,ictionc,i nt c tor , 1: • • 11 • nroci.... all wo. ..-nc!.nq/ron&ncl Ittx --ntrctor mh,k1) prelsv4,'-1 th, nr,7.reletionn; Prc,ponnntrly' t.i.on • )7nrIn(Ict1.on of f.t.o "This:;* Pint • Finn+ in,,,otion. 'w;0 onn :.,n6norons ron d. I porIbiltLy•to (.74-21) and of thplr, 1 not nrun,it ;Any re. •;tinf: ,out tho ,; •,?or • ,ghr,.11 veg. rrn 0. Aro ntv-fw riTn' irr:-.0,)tior. 2.; mn ".\ drP. wor te Ur ta!Ln mr try t• roor '.i..-k ;h• 2 (Yr,rrl' -vrtr nOt: Ttoot,tn: .,ro.TfA!ctur r4lcuromor. 'r:Ps k1-4s uhown vcr •).gne (fro. irliT.4ti :Lod gri. '711 b- , Nt • bmp- .rt: 71/4..h• rAeo on 711-,Ins., rtii ' 7sn' i4or 1.'urthor !t-rorre.-on P 2 neJ„Fmnp.o Colltrnotor Jch 1h info otio N6. 4L :o pit 6. o'e pl. ahnli )7w0 t. ',A,: • 72 hor nol- q to •::on Co • ••) 7017 • / • • • - -114 • " 7 • .:-;;;;;rt;.■ • it on 4 •of fir' • 1r• Ato ) tho ( • .0)1 • C ..t.poLIV. • is T.: 1 P1.714itt'l '.bo 117 unty, in No.,1.(..:11 thiv, :o5otz occu. N74.,ko-v.i,vipm* . rovArai-.:4Ita by ,+,qt..Y . . • • •Ci • C ,pp7.' • th&. • )joc • . ic 1. th, ity tor • 7.1;11ti r•Y!,:,- • ^•■•,:e •1 • • • - - • ! " /(:7'-/-/-7-,, /?.,..,.-/fr? i.?,', 1'.. 1-• s'r ...i's / • :-• :, . , ;'.. • • h , - ., : , L. r r„g":-.• , , I I „ .•. IA) i 7 ,,t r ' •'. •' / • : ' /•,•,•, / i • • /11 ,:.I " :- i ,- • fl:.: 1 (•:f-4.1.. (...." '1 •'"-•,\ •\•,.': • . ,._ , . /I - — . , • ' • / •• . , ..' - • , ....,_ ,. :, -. . , ---. / / — 1 . _ -• " . -- ,. - -.„-•,--.7 ri / / / 4 1 '',A...1., , i• . ; .. . ''' :1-: / / f.), ',. .• „.........)..,,-,• , , , . „ ,., -..., ,. " -r •• • , CV/ • , . .A, I t")//47'2L-6 , • , • p 7( As; ;-•'/1 t: • iii ' r' I% /�, C . (77. .1 • , / J- N „ _� :' /I. ? '7,6 / O•G, ;D, ,,e5 c ' / f' , . . 7; / 4 r-r • �,g.1 ! SIP, "Tn > ; .D i."-k"=7, I41 ,,■1, - 7 %f'tC cfh«�; _l exported from eite. Determin∎ Source of the topsoil ehrel: delivery. Strip all existing weeds /c placement or rototilling. Re7 Plant beds shall be to the sz to planting, and shall only 7. Plent pits shall be twice the width. Plant as shown in detz the plant pits. Contractor si problems, if any problems c to the LA's attention for cc taking any actions. Proposed drainage solutions E upon notification by the lane problem. No plants will be allowed prolonged freezing, and dur± a wet or muddy condition. PD accepted practice. Stake tre 8. Fertilize all trees and shrul i-Hlense formula fertilizer tz recommendations. Agr_ iform brr 9. 111 mulch in plant beets shad_: adjoining hard surfaces, roar Mulch shall occur only in Al: trees, shrubs and groundcovel Mulch shall be 2" depth of Nt Northwest Cascade, Puyallup, 10. ',Apply Vitamin B -1 root n1 planting of any plants. Apply antidesicant, to plants delivery to site. 11. pacings of all plants shall Yield adjusted by the 1 rcnc :al of the LA onsite. • .... :� r y- i`) r, , t >4 <rN :+sn 1.- 7 r rzr ^hitec p;.. s. or to :6 bu: '_d..ingz: v81-11 .1117 e.ir nwr, WA4 or -P:pprr 41 ad?, %)o •rify with t'o.kg zitiflq p1P.vit.r.4 on s .rry-• etatl-W 0A er.te,:curtl-,-- werm realoms, pil t? rArbitec' tt, pytor to -5N—bu.ildIngra 'di-4,114w • the of NS. of M117:::• 1 ; src TU■ '11 e*Yerstflt. „,) ivexi-orr or. C'seex.,1114 , • ••••., e te:4' iAtkey • ,••••■■/111.1•1*111.1110.11111*14*0111./...1.11401,14, • / ................... .a..,....}.............,,,,, • !•(.1...4 X,V.: • , • • 1. ' .--f-r-f5 -4-4-- ',.• ,.:). . ,„44.....„..7 .,,,........—....................—..... fr11,1,1.441. :.1... 2:1 tn 'V•Nf .. rfr '■ ., „a.' - . or (4 dt... ., .. • MTAMIVrtt — -%",'gr?'_.gR'Z.Tfrri5rt.TF.r.nttreOgZrg:;;::gifV‘Y4'';.i.'j :3 1 " =20' 10 20 40 .S$ EX. SS MH RIM =40.96 IE= 29.51(8" E,W,N) (CENTER OF CHANNEL ROPQSED F DRS ti hp • Ay EX. CB RIM =33.95 IE =31.99 12 "W IE =31.85 12"S E=31.60 18"N IE =31.67 8"SE . IE =32.00 (NEW 1 S) a•a •i o� `. i yg .yo 5.128th STREET .y ss SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO —� PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATCH ,S\IEW ASPHALT TO EXISTING 43. REMOVE EXIST CHAIN BA AND METAL POSTS: C 4110•01 CAP' :& EX. :PIP INE TREE' ASPHALT: BERM SEE' DUAL SHT. 3' OF 3 a .■••••.r PROPOSED DRAINAGE EX. CB EX. FIRE HYDRANT RIM =34.36 IE= 31.31(12 "NE) PVC ^P. EX. CB RIM =33.95 IE =31.99 12"W IE =31.85 12"S IE =31.60 18"N IE =31.67 8 "SE IE =32.00 (NEW 2') I b. awl/. .3.. SD EX. CB RIM =35.01 IE =31.28 12"SW)PVC IE =31.23 18"S)CMP 1E =28.83 12"S)CONC. IE =28.89 12" NW)CONC. 35.01 4• EX. SS MH RIM =35.04 IE =30.45(8" E.W) IE= 30.45(6 "N,S) (CENTER OF CHANNEL) SIDEWALK' • V• CONTROL STRUCTURE CB #4 - TYPE II - 72" (SOLID LOCKING LID) RIM = 38.00 IE = 32.32 12" SE) IE = 32.32 12" NW) IE = 32.32 6" SW) DWY. ��'s ,, ,,`D° S. 128th STREET ss ss SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATCH 44VEW ASPHALT TO EXISTING tih ,�r °• CB #5 - TYPE I W/ SOLID LOCKING UD RIM = 35.5± FLUSH W/ EX. GRADE IE = 32.18 12" NW) IE = 32.18 12" SE) ,;> IE = 32.18 6" SE) ' 18 LF 6" ADS-N12 ® 0.5% EX. WATEI E • / SS \ EN SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO . PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATC �EW ASPHALT TO EXISTING // • �,. ,., ... 36 S89'59'31" E 6 INSTALL NEW E CHAINLINK FEN 3" DIA. STEEL POST(TY ci- -- o - - -- o - - -- -- 0 = i 1 - PHALT BERM 0.6z SEE DETAIL SHT. 3 OF 3 INE TREE 38.00 IE =32.70 -710 LF 12" ADS--N12 ® 0.5% • 92 REMOVE • FXISI1fS 37 A AND EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE INSTALL NEW 75 GPM SF..E-- DILSH._7_,_ RIM = 36.00 IE = 32.26 (12" IN & OUT) ■ I� 14 LF 6" ADS -N12 1 0.5% 36 ASPHALT BERM SEE DETAIL SHT. 3 OF 3 CB #1 - TYPE I RIM = .37.40 IE = 34.41 (12" E) NEW EXTRUDED CONC. CB #2 TYPE I RIM = 37.40 IE = 33.86 12" SE) IE = 33.86 (12" NW) Qh 4' 12„ ADS -N j2 0 M 0.59 r 7 ,�y' DETE r •N POND, SE SH FOR DIMENSIC RADING HYDRANT CONTROL STRUCTURE g•E WI CB #4 - TYPE II - 72" 6"N,S (SOLID LOCKING LID) )F CHANNEL) RIM = 38.00 IE = 32.32 12" SE) IE = 32.32 12" NW) IE = 32.32 6" SW) ob �o I co a a DWY. ' EX. WATER VALVE --\2, EX. POWE POLE o'` b ^' o. • v / /�► EX. HANDI -CAP A . /It RAMPS v) (PE OCKING LID EX. GRADE 12" NW) 12" SE) op 6" SE) ADS -N12 WATER VAL X. SS MH RIM =38.53 IE= 31.00(24 "N,S)CMP (CENTER OF CHANNEL) EX. CB RIM =38.67 IE =36.37 8"SW CMP .30 18"S MP ,82 24��1 CMP ss ss -� END 6" VERTICAL SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO CURB PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATCH EW ASPH�SLT TO EXISTING STOP SIGN ti"' 1 "E s EX. SS MH RIM =40.99 IE= 32.01(8 "N,S)PVC IE =32.01 8"W)DI IE =32.01 6"E)STL (CENTER OF CHANNEL) 3d 366 INSTALL NEW 6' EX. W • R VALVE CHAINLINK FENCE 39. L`' FI' E YarANT EX. CB (2'X4' GRATE) RIM =39.66 IE =34.46 12 "W)CONC IE =35.36 8"S CMP IE= 35.21 8"N)CMP 9. 31 - O - -TKO -- �-" 37 �\ I E =32.70 J=327- -32.7 IE =32.70 N � 92 IS 12� ADS-N12 .b9 CB #2 TYPE I • RIM = 37.40 IE = 33.86 (12" SE) IE = 33:86 (12" . NW) DETE SH - -40 ice- S; r 48.2 / -IN: f POND, SEE DETAIL DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS 4" r PINE TRa b1 PI T 1 I 1 1 41. * 16" DIA. f TREE A POWER E EX. CB RIM =39.24 IE= 37.79(8" NE)CMP INSTALL: 1 1/2" IRRIGATION R WITH BACKFLOW PROTECTOR 'CB 3 - TYPE II = 40.00 W/ /SOLID LOCKING LID IE 33.40 (12"N IE = 33.40 (12" NW) 6" VERTICI L CURB CONTRACTOR T OF EXISTING W EX. SS MH RIM =40.99 IE =32.01 8" N,S)PVC IE= 32.01' 8"W)DI IE =32.01 6" E)STL (CENTER OF CHANNEL) - EX. CB (2•X4' GRATE) RIM =39.66 o Uhb IE =34.46 12 "W)CONC IE =35.36 8'S CMP IE =35.21 8"N)CMP it^ -SD-- EX. CB RIM =39.24 IE= 37.79(8 NE)CMP INSTALL: 1 1/2" IRRIGATION R WITH BACKFLOW PROTECTOR /B 3 - TYPE 11 40.00. W/. SOLID LOCKING LID IE = 33.40 (12" N, IE = 33.40 (12" NW NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER MAIN ADD EARTHWORK - QUANTITIES. CO REVISED PER CITY m m c 0 m 0 0 O J C5 cc 0 w 0 0 ^c I.L.. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN U z Y cc cr W Z Q cc W 0 W QO ac z W w Z z J CONTRACTOR. SHALL REGRADE EXISTING SLOPE AREA 'AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE UNIFORM; - SLOPE. STABILIZE DISTURBED': AREA WITH STRAW MULCH AND HYDROSEED IMMEDIATLY. 0 m N 0 U • TOP ROCK = 51.0.__1 BOT. ROCK= 47.0 INSTALL NEW ROCKEF WITH 6" FOOTING DM SEE DETAIL SHEET 3 (MAX. ROCKERY HT.= SHALL REGRADE )PE AREA AS REQUIRED UNIFORM SLOPE. STURBED AREA WITH H AND HYDROSEED 5" �IA. `CEDAR TREE. ' T to E 3.OF 3 • 42- ---- ROCKERY DRAIN TIGHTLINE 0 1.0% MIN.. 46.0p ". BOT. • OCK =49.5 OCK= 4 - 44 MINIM ■•••110 •011111111 01101 NEW EX CURB.. c 3 "OF 3 • 46 4 .0 46 w 48 '10 p N SO --�� Z ah. E---12-ZOO 1 �z 5 3a, TOP ROCK =51.0 BOT. ROCK= 47.0 INSTALL NEW ROCKERY WITH 6" FOOTING DRAIN SEE DETAIL SHEET 3 OF 3 (MAX. ROCKERY HT.= 4 FT.) 60 \\ END CHAIN LINK FENCE ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: ON —SITE EXCAVATION= 520± cy ON —SITE BORROW= 520± cy IMPORT FILL= 0 N 89%59'13" W JJ tk. r I EXISTING BUILDING STOP SIGN YELLOW STRIPE 0 - -- 46 N8"' 9'13"W 145.67' 8" DIA. TREE END CHAIN LINK FENCE J: EXISTING BUILDING b�. END. 1/2" REBAR & CAP EX. MAIL 80 ti by �� EX. WATER METER EX. FIRE HYDRANT a4 N00'03'50" E EX. TEL PHONE MANHOL 4. 35 L r EX. WATER VALVE 46 EX. C8 RIM =40.90 IE= 38.51(8" S I.)CMP -'EX, CB RIM =41.61 IE= 34.95(18" N)CMP IE =34.95((18" S CMP IE -38.79 8"NE CMP EX. CB RIM =44.35 IE= 41.88(8"S)CMP EX. CB RIM =45.01 ,)E= 38.33(18 N)CMP �' IE =38.33((18"S))CMP IE =41.53 12"E CONC. �L -GAL DESCRIPTION: ESSICO ADDITION TO SHORT PLAT No. 90- RECORDING No, 91'01 SHORT PLAT DFA -TRJ NOTE: 'BASIS OF BEARINGS 'Ct E. MARGINAL. WAY VERTICAL DAM* ;BENCHMARK PER BI ;.'SURVEY FOR WHITE LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOUR`. EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING SPOT ELEVA PROPOSED SPOT ELE EXISTING STORM LINE PROPOSED STORM LII ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING SAN. SWR. \ PROPOSED FENCE FE PU c SfGN 0 In 0 w J m D O 0 RIM =40.90 IE= 38.51(8 "SOCMP EX. CB RIM -41.61 IE =34.95 18" N CMP '• IE= 34.9518 "S'CMP IE= 38.79 8" NE CMP J Z 0 cc Q 1 1p ^ co• W NO0'03'50" E ktic P• EX. TEL PHONE 3s MANHOL EX. CB RIM =44.35 IE= 41.88(8" S)CMP EX. CB RIM =45.01 6,IE= 38.33(18"N)CMP .y IE =38.33((18"S))CMP IE =41.53 12"E CONC. CINfl LEGAL DESCRIPTION ESSICO ADDITION TO RIVERTON LOT B OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT No. 90 -4 —SS RECORDING No. 91'011404003 OF SAID SHORT PLAT DFA— TRACT1. NOTE: 'BASIS OF BEARINGS, ASSUMED N 00'03'50" E ^.({_ E. MARGINAL WAY PER KING COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP. VERTICAL DA11J BENCHMARK PER BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, P.S., INC. '"SURVEY FOR WHITELY — JACOBSEN & ASSOC. 11/19/74 • LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING STORM LINE PROPOSED STORM LINE ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING SAN. SWR. PROPOSED FENCE — --- -- 56 -- -- -- ✓ v o • • 43 19 56.2 - -- SD — — — — SS RECEIVED MAR 2 3 1995 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 2 31995 PERMIT CENTER CC oo F- W P O) 0 iii c ON U Q (0 N II i` Z O z 0 0 v U • ■—• 0 Q • - 0. 0 Q 0 4)Q'OlO9. EXPIRES 0 (.1) 72ND AVENUE N 00 i< CJ rr) N N CNJ CO Ocp N N p) CO CO E z 0 t ).90 torsv.)CMP .61 5 118"18' W CMP CMP 8"NE CMP S- LEGAL DE80RIF T O ESSICO ADDITION TO RIVERTON LOT B OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT No. 90 -4 —SS RECORDING No. 91'011404003 OF SAID SHORT PLAT DFA— TRACT1. NOTE BASIS OF BEARINGS, ASSUMED N 00'03'50" E -ft_ E. MARGINAL WAY PER KING COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP. VERTICAL DATUM BENCHMARK PER BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, P.S., INC. '`SURVEY FOR WHITELY- JACOBSEN & ASSOC. 11/19/74 A LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS • EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING STORM LINE PROPOSED STORM LINE ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING SAN. SWR. PROPOSED FENCE RECEIVED MAR 2 3 1995 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS ESECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 2 3 1995 PERMIT CENTER fP43POtC _ --56 _..._...._ • • 40 19 56.2 -- SD -- — 1111111111111111111 ET. I 111111111111111 • SS 0 z_ z z Q Q g 0 z a w z 0 z U 0 - - - -- o - - -- 1 " =20' 10 20 40 I2 _ SS SS FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOTES: PROPOS TEMPORARY EROSION /: 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST, WITH MINIMUM 6 -INCH OVERLAP, AND SECURELY FASTENED AT BOTH ENDS TO POST. • 2. POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND (MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). 3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED APPROXIMATELY 8 INCHES WIDE AND 12 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS AND UP SLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. 4. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED, A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UP SLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG, TIE WIRES OR HOG RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. 5. THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR WIRED TO THE FENCE, AND 20 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES. 6. WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSE POST SPACING IS USED, THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE ELIMINATED. IN SUCH A CASE, THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE POSTS WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ABOVE NOTES APPLYING. 7. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED BEFORE THE UP SLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 8. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. ss • •• 4, ss s INSTALL MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL THIS SHEET (TYP) PROPOSED PARKING LOT EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PL 41- P. t INSTALL MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL • THIS SHEET' (TYP) l '5h njo ss + ss girt' IE =35.95 00000000 000000CT. 0000000 • 0 • ,C)000Q100 0Q00000 000-0 -000 00000_?3' 0000000 I cs • • • 0 0 •'v1 • 00 • • 00 NSTALL S89'59'31" E IE =35.75 40 LF 8" CULVERT ►ti INSTALL TEMPORARY"' CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL THIS SHEET INSTALL TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR SWALE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET —_,.( PICAL) 35 40 /4 >T CONTROL PLAN • 6, G� 0 n v Cp 'Lb INSTAL FABRI THIS .yh oe II — ss SS INSTALL B PROTECTION PER DET L\THIS SHEET 18 S89 "59'31" E IE =35.75 (t ---_ 36 ONCE :ET NTERCEPTOR HIS SHEET INSTALL TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR SWALE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET (TYPICAL) INSTALL TEMPORA EDIMENT TRAP PER DET THIS S (TYPICAL) IN ALL MIRAFI FILTER ABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL THIS 40 �/ SHEET, (TYP.) • INSTALL CB PROTECTION ncb IICTAII TL11C CI =IFFT LE ES Sh RE SI- NC BP c_ VS BE St TE Eta MI to IN RI P )00000001 00000000 X00000001 AAA AAA A as 4, ss - - - SD - LEGAL DEOCRIP1104 ESSICO ADDITION TO RIVERTON LOT B OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT No. 90-4--SS RECORDING No. 91011404003 OF SAID SHORT PLAT DFA— TRACT1. O BNAS S OF BEARINGS, ASSUMED N 00'03'50" E Ct E. MARGINAL WAY PER KING COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP. VEf171CAL DATUM BENCHMARK PER BUSH, ROED Sc HITCHINGS, P.S., INC. SURVEY FOR WHITELY — JACOBSEN & ASSOC. 11/19/74 LEGEND: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MIRAFI FILTER FENCE INT,ERCEPTOR SWALE RIP RAP PAD EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS J U ,Q ›- u_ z se z cc z_ c cn cc g W LL 1 =20 BRIAN WOLLASTON Xrefs: Z- 5243B1- 5243S, 0 File: 5243 —E1 Date /Time: '1/19/1994 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS" FOR THIS PLAN SHALL BE 1991 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION AS PUBUSHED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) AND THE AMERICAN PUBUC WORKS ASSOCIATION (APWA), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED AND /OR AMENDED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT BY THE SCHEME SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS FOR THE SCHEME SHOWN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. THE 4, CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST, REPAIR AND UPGRADE SILTATION CONTROL FACILITIES AS WEATHER CONDITIONS CHANGE AND AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 5. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: CONTRACTOR TO ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING W OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. ESTABLISH GRADING LIMITS. 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL FILTER FABRIC FENCE, SEDIMENTATION TRAP. 3. CLEARING AND GRADING LIMITS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COINCIDENT WITH THE 6. LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. CLEARING AND GRADING WILL BE NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. 4. IF STOCKPILED TOPSOIL AND FILL MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE SITE IS DETERMINED TO REMAIN MORE THAN 24 HOURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COVER ALL STOCKPILE AREAS AND DISTURBED AREAS CONTIGUOUS WITH CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY DURING THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1 THROUGH MARCH 31. IN ADDITION, ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS INCLUDING PROPOSED STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON THE SITE SHALL BE COVERED WITH CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY DURING THE SEASONAL PERIOD DESCRIBED PREVIOUSLY. THE CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 9 -14.5 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. COVERING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TIGHTLY IN PLACE BY USING SAND BAGS OR TIES ON ROPES WITH THE MAXIMUM 10 -FOOT GRID SPACING IN ALL DIRECTIONS. ALL SEAMS SHALL BE TAPED OR WEIGHTED DOWN FULL LENGTH AND THEIR SHALL BE AT LEAST A 12 -INCH OVERLAP OF ALL SEAMS. ALL COVERINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY INSTALLED UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORKDAY ACTIVITIES DURING THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1 TO MARCH 31, AND /OR REMAIN UNTIL VEGETATION IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. IF STOCKPILED TOPSOIL AND /OR FILL MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE SITE IS DETERMINED TO REMAIN MORE THAN 6 MONTHS, ALL SLOPES AND SURFACES OF THE FILL SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED, MULCH, ETC., ALL DISTURBED AREAS INCLUDING BUT NOT UMITED TO THE ENTIRE STORM RETENTION FACILITY AND ASSOCIATED SIDE SLOPES AFTER COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. MULCHING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF HAY OR STRAW SPREAD AT A 2 -INCH DEPTH OF WOOD FIBER CELLULOSE SPREAD AT 25 TO 35 POUNDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. MULCHING MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING PROCESS. SHOULD SEEDING AND MULCHING PROCESS BE PERFORMED DURING THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30, CLEAR PLASTIC COATING MAY NOT BE REQUIRED DEPENDING UPON . WEATHER CONDITIONS. SHOULD SEEDING AND MULCHING BE PERFORMED AFTER OCTOBER 1, THEN CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER APPLICATION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR PROPOSE ALTERNATIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FROM THE DESCRIBED REQUIREMENTS, PRIOR APPROVAL MUST BE GRANTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 5. UNDER SUPERVISION BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING SITE TO ENSURE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE ADEQUATE AS WEATHER AND SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE. 6. TRACKED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OPERATED ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 10:1 SUCH THAT CLEAT MARKS SHALL RUN PERPENDICULAR TO DOWNHILL SLOPES (CONTOURED). 7. LOCATE INTERCEPTOR SWALES OR DIKES DOWNSLOPE OF THE BUILDING FOUNDATION AS NEEDED SUCH THAT RUNOFF SHALL BE DIRECTED AND RETAINED ON SITE. 8. ALL CUT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSLOPE OF INTERCEPTOR DIKES OR SWALES SUCH THAT RUNOFF FROM MATERIAL SHALL REMAIN ON SITE. STOCKPILED CUT MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN NOTE NO. 4 ABOVE. 9. PUBUC STREETS ABUTTING SITE SHALL BE CHECKED AND /OR CLEANED A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY 24 HOURS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN UP ANY SOIL OR SEDIMENTS FOUND. 7. 8. 9. PROCEED WITH GRADING ACTIVITIES. INSTALL ROCKERY. INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND DETENTION POND. PROCEED WITH FINE GRADING. PAVE PARKING AREA AS SHOWN ON PLANS. INSTALL EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBS. 10. HYDUOSEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS ROCK CONSTRUCTIC NOT COVERED WITH LANDSCAPING. WIRE SCREEN AROUND CONCRETE BLOCK GRAVEL FILTER 1 -1 1/2' WASHED ROCK RUN —OFF WATER W/ SEDIMENT 7 OVERFLOW CONC. BLOCK WIRE SCREEN w.r., �M SUMP FILTERED WATER SEDIMENT DROP INLET W/ GRATE GEOFAB FILTER GRATE UNDER CB PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE C a N ONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: CONTRACTOR TO ARRANGE AND ATTEND RECONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE C OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACMES. ESTABLISH GRADING LIMITS. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL FILTER FABRIC FENCE, ROCK CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENTATION TRAP. PRO +;EED WITH GRADING ACTMTIES. INSTALL. ROCKERY. INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM " AND DETENTION POND. PROCEED WITH FINE GRADING. PAVE PARKING AREA AS SHOWN ON PLANS. INSTALL EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBS. ). HYDROSEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT COVERED WITH LANDSCAPING:. .. WIRE SCREEN AROUND. CONCRETE BLOCK GRAVEL FILTER 1 -1 1/2' WASHED ROCK RUN —OFF WATER W/ SEDIMENT OVERFLOW CONC. BLOCK WIRE SCREEN FILTERED SEDIMENT ED WATER GEOFAB FILTER GFRA UNDER TE CB PROTECTION DETAIL DROP INLET W/ GRATE NCIT TO SCALE L' 42 - 1' DEPTH 2"-4" ROCK t J lift r= �o n' - 1' DEPTH 3/4"-1 1/2N WASH GRAVEL MAX WS EL= 2' SEIILING DEPTH 1,5' SEDIMENT STORAGE' j- 50 Al5-A__9' E- 123 v0`-------, _- OUTFLOW CHANNEL IF CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATION. 4' MIN OUTLET NOTE: MAY BE CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATION OR BY BUILDING A BERM 1' OVERFLOW DEPTH FILTER FABRIC FENCING SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE USE CRL SHC NOT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR IS 2. ADDmONAL QUA 3. THE 50' MINIML TO INSURE MA1 TEMPOR, NOT TO SCALE a' 42 — 0. 90 0 ?t3 ft„ Gch a• v �k• Y a• r 46 -- -- _ 61, N8 '5,9'1 3" W 1 45.67' Aq ro. 1 1 1 a" 4, • Ea• EXISTIN ASPHALT STREET aa. 8' MIN. 43 N00'03'50" E bitk DRAIF EXIST ELEVI PROP USE 4 TO 6' QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK FOR SURFACING AS SHOWN. MATERIAL WITH 'FINES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. NOTES; 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING AND CLEANING THE APPROACH ON A REGULAR BASIS. 2. ADDITIONAL QUARRY SPALLS MUST BE ADDED IF DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. 3. THE 50' MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE LENGTHENED IF DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY TO INSURE MATERIAL IS NOT TRACKED INTO THE PUBUC RIGHT —OF —WAY. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE TEMP. INTERCEPTOR D NOT TO SCALE O. 90 0 98 14.35 • • NO0'03'50" E r crvir-vririrc r DRAINAGE J r 'Jrt m' EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION h PROPOSED ROCKERY 2"x4• WOOD POST ALT: STEEL FENCE POSTS FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 2"x2'x14 GA. FABRIC OR EQUIV. PROVIDE .75 – 1.5 WASHED GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 80" WIDE ROLLS. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTATCH FABRIC TO WIRE. 7 xf x14 GA WIRE FABRIC OR EOM, o W c' U < 75 0 CV N If C z O T. mmommosauffeme BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER ( MATERIAL IN 8'x17' TRENCH 1 1 8' MAX -..-2'x4' WOOD POSTS, STANDARD OR BLir�t, U ` OR EQUAL ALTERNATE: STEEL FENCE POSTS -I I MIRAFI FILTER FENCE NOT TO SCALE F:-Y. ir'd ''_J.•x�:i L'zyf_ GG t; ACZ 20 i TUKWIL/ PUBLIC WOFLKS TEMP. INTERCEPTOR DITCH NOT TO SCALE o "4 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 2 3 1995 PERMIT MITER EnfitiONEKTEXWBAUKM 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION," WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER, 1988 EDITION. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. 2. AN APPROVED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 3. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY. 4. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (433 -1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 5. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION SERVICE (1 -800- 424 -5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTA WE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. 6. CATCH BASIN - TYPE I - PER WSDOT /APWA STANDARD PLAN B -1 OR ASSOCIATED SAND AND GRAVEL CB -15, OR EQUAL 7. CATCH BASIN - TYPE II - PER WSDOT /APWA STANDARD PLAN B -1E (48' I.D. OR 54" I.E. AS DESIGNATED) OR ASSOCIATED SAND AND GRAVEL CB -19, OR EQUAL. 8. UNIT COVERS AS DESIGNATED ARE WSDOT /APWA STANDARD, (PER STANDARD PLAN B- 12). 9. ALL TYPE II CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LADDERS OR SAFETY STEPS PER WSDOT /APWA STANDARD PLAN B -12. 10. ALL CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER WSDOT /APWA STANDARD PLAN B -2A. 11. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL BE DEPRESSED 0.10 FEET BELOW PAVEMENT /CURB LEVEL. 12, ALL OIL /WATER SEPARATOR CB GRATES SHALL BE OF THE ROUND SOLID LOCKING TYPE. 13. ALL STORM DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE PIPE SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AS DESIGNATED: A. HELICAL CORRUGATED ALUMINUM (OR ASPHALT- TREATED STEEL), MINIMUM 16 GAUGE OR GREATER AS SHOWN 2 -2/3" X 1/2" CORRUGATION, WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTING BANDS. B. CONCRETE, PER A.S.T.M. C -14, CLASS II, NONREINFORCED BELL AND SPIGOT (WITH BELL FLUSH WITH C.B. WALL OF USED), WITH RUBBER GASKETS. C. P.V.C. CONFORMING TO A.S.T.M. D -3034 - SDR 35. D. PIPE MAY BE ANY OF THE ABOVE PROVIDED: 1) PIPE JOINTS MUST BE OF THE SAME MATERIALS, AND 2) WHERE A PIPE MATERIAL IS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THAT MATERIAL MUST BE USED. MINIMUM PIPE COVER SHALL BE 2.0 FEET. SMOOTH WALL SPIRAL RIB ALUMINUM OR ASPHALT- TREATED STEEL) PIPE, 16 GAUGE, W/34" X 3/4" RIBS AT 7 1/2" O.C. G. ADS TYPE N -12 HIGH - DENSITY POLYETHYLENE CORRUGATED PIPE WITH AN INTEGRALLY FORMED SMOOTH INTERIOR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF A.A.S.H.T.O. M -294. 14. ALL PIPE BEDDING SHALL CONFORM TO WcOOT /APWA ccrTin►J o_zn 7fi\o rnr, E. F. IWITAffSetiligEMNIUM 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION." WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBUC WORKS ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER, 1988 EDITION. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. 2. AN APPROVED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 3. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY. 4. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (433 -1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 5. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION SERVICE (1- 800 -422 -5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESED THE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. 6. THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. 7. ALL NEW SANITARY SEWER UNES SHALL BE SEALED OFF AT THE EXISTING TRUNK CONNECTION POINT UNTIL ALL UPSTREAM CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, CLEANED, TESTED, LAMPED, AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIF. AND WATER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PIPE PRIOR TO OPENING SEAL. 8. MANHOLES AND UDS: A. ALL TYPE I - 48" MANHOLES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER WSDOT /APWA STANDARD DETAIL B -23A, WITH ECCENTRIC CONES. B. ALL MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DROP OF 0.10 FEET BETWEEN INVERTS. C, ALL MANHOLES NOT IN PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. D. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ALL MANHOLE TOPS TO MATCH FINAL ASPHALT ELEVATIONS AND GROUND ELEVATIONS IN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 9. SEWER PIPE, BEDDING, AND TRENCH COMPACTION: A. ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AS DESIGNATED: 1. P.V.C, CONFORMING TO A.S.T.M. S -3034, SDR 35. 2. DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 50, CONFORMING TO A.W.W.A C151. 3. PIPE MAY BE ANY OF THE ABOVE PROVIDED: A PIPE JOINTS MUST BE OF THE SAME MATERIALS, AND B) WHERE A PIPE MATERIAL IS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THAT MATERIAL MUST BE USED. B. C. 10. SIDE 4. MINIMUM PIPE COVER AT MANHOLES SHALL BE 8.0 FEET AND 5.0 FEET BETWEEN RUNS. PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE A.P.W.A. TYPE "F" WITH MATERIAL CONFORMING TO SECTION 9- 30.7A(2). TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 92% DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY PER A.S.T.M D- 1557 -70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) PRIOR TO TESTING SEWE UNES FOR ACCEPTANCE. SEWER I ATFRAI C• HiSALAM ND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD DNS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION." WASHINGTON IRTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC .WORKS ASSOCIATION, 4 STATE CHAPTER, 1988 EDMON. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF F TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. :D COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS 3S. THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE THER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN CITY VAY. 1Y CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING (433 -1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. IS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY Y OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE iY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF OCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ' CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION 300 - 422 -5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTA E IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFUCT EXISTS. SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED I ARE ON F1LE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY ;OM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE NCY. fTARY SEWER ONES SHALL BE SEALED OFF AT THE EXISTING TRUNK POINT UNTIL ALL UPSTREAM CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, CLEANED, QED, AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PIPE PRIOR TO OPENING SEAL ID LIDS: 'E 1 - 48" MANHOLES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER WSDOT /APWA ARD DETAIL B -23A, WITH ECCENTRIC CONES. NHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DROP OF 0.10 FEET BETWEEN INVERTS. 1NHOLES NOT IN PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. _l BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ALL MANHOLE TO MATCH FINAL ASPHALT ELEVATIONS AND GROUND ELEVATIONS IN CAPED AREAS. BEDDING, AND TRENCH COMPACTION: INER PIPE SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AS DESIGNATED: '.V.C, CONFORMING TO A.S.T.M. S -3034, SDR 35. )UCTILE IRON. CLASS 50, CONFORMING TO AW.W.A C151. 'IPE MAY BE ANY OF THE ABOVE PROVIDED: 9 PIPE JOINTS MUST BE OF THE SAME MATERIALS, AND WHERE A PIPE MATERIAL IS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THAT MATERIAL MUST BE USED. INIMUM PIPE COVER AT MANHOLES SHALL BE 8.0 FEET AND 5.0 FEET 3ETWEEN RUNS. DOING SHALL BE A.P.W.A. TYPE "F" WITH MATERIAL CONFORMING TO 1 9-30.7A(2). BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 92% DRY OPTIMUM PER A.S.T.M D- 1557 -70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) PRIOR TO TESTING SEWER OR ACCEPTANCE. 4TERALS: 9. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINISH GRADING, ANY DISTURBED AREAS NOT SPECIFIED FOR PERMANENT LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION, CONSISTING TO OF RAPID, PERSISTENT, AND LEGUME GRASSES (MINIMUM 80# PER ACRE). THIS - 20% ANNUAL, PERENNIAL, OR HYBRID RYE GRASS - 40% CREEPING RED FESCUE - 40% WHITE CLOVER 10. THE SITE WORK IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PARKING LOTS AND STREET CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF ANY TRAVELED SURFACE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 12. AU. PARKING AND DRIVEWAY AREAS TO HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO COLLEC TION /CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS OR OVERLAND SHEET DRAIN AREAS AT ONE PERCENT MINIMUM SLOPE; PLAN DETAILS SHALL NOT SUPERSEDE THIS REQUIREMENT. 13. OPEN -CUT ROAD CROSSINGS FOR UTILITY TRENCHES ON EXISTING TRAVELED ROADWAYS SHALL BE BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA, WSDOT /APWA STANDARD PLAN 13-11, AND MECHANICALLY COMPACTED. CUTS INTO THE EXISTING ASPHALT SHALL BE NEAT -LINE CUT WITH SAW IN A CONTINUOUS UNE. A TEMPORARY COLD MIX PATCH MUST BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILL AND COMPACTION. A PERMANENT HOT MIX PATCH SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 30 DAYS AND SHAD_ BE THE THICKNESS OF THE ORIGINAL ASPHALT OR THREE (3) INCHES, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 14. EXTRUDED CEMENT CONCRETE CURBS AROUND ASPHALT EDGES SHALL BE CON STRUCTED PER DETAIL. W-ALCI .NOTID . ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WTTH THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION," WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER, 1988 EDmON. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. • AN APPROVED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IN CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (433 -1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING, ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER UTILITIES NO SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION SERVICE (1- 800 - 424 -5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTA LIVE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. THE WATER MAIN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING FACIUTIES SHALL BE SEALED OFF UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. NO CONNECTIONS WILL BE ALLOWED UNTIL THE NEW WATER MAINS HAVE PASSED ALL PRESSURE AND PURITY TESTS. WATER MAIN PIPE, BEDDING, AND TRENCH COMPACTION: A. Al I WATFR FAIN PIPF TO RF CFLIFNT I INFO_ el ACS 52 DI ICTII F IRON. T C C ASPHALT PAVI NOT TO SCALE ASPHALT BEF NOT TO SCALE ROUND SOLID COVER MAR W/ LOCKING BOLTS. UNLE APPROVED BY ENGINEER FRAME AND LADDER OR S OFFSET. SEE PLAN SHEE FRAME & GRATE ELEVATIO PER PLANS 38.50 CHAIN -200# CAPACITY PECIFIED. FOR MANENT S (MINIMUM j80# 0 THE APPROVED DEVIATION FROM GENCY. ALL TIMES BY WED. OLLEC NE PERCENT% EMENT. VELED ROADWAYS T /APWA. THE EXISTING E. A TEMPORARY D COMPACTION. AND SHALL BE THE HEVER IS GREATER. L BE CON STANDARD N," WASHINGTON.. WORKS ASSOCIATION, IE LATEST EDITION OF IER CONSTRUCTION IS OBTAIN STREET USE ACTIVIY IN CffY IGINEERING ;TRUCTION MEETING. N ESTABLISHED BY DULD THEREFORE: BE TE. .IT IS THE SOLE THE ACCURACY OF ) AVOID AN'? OTHER IMPLEMENTATION OF NDERGROUND LOCATION )WNER OR HIS REPRESENTA EXISTS. ACCORDING TO THE k ENGINEERING L REQUIRE WRITTEN. NTIL CONSTRUCTION IS NEW WATER MAINS HAVE DUCTILE IRON,•:; :..C151 ;Ll6),' 0 APPLY SEALER COAT AT SAWCUT JOINT 3" (MIN.) COMPACTED DEPTH TYPE "B' ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 4" (MIN.) COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK BASE 12" (MIN) COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL ASPHALT PAVING SECTION NOT TO SCALE NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT (FINISH GRADE) 2.0' MIN 3.5' MAX. 0.25' MAX. 0.08' MIN. ASPHALT BERM DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ROUND SOLID COVER MARKER "DRAIN" W/ LOCKING BOLTS. UNLESS OTHERWISED APPROVED BY ENGINEER FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET. SEE PLAN SHEET. FRAME Sc GRATE ELEVATION PER PLANS 38.50 CHAIN -200# CAPACITY SI AClt..auucr.1 en-rr is nrmuni `\ EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB DE NOT TO SCALE ORIGINAL GROUND 1:6 BATTER !rit .(ii-- III_.i = tan " —_n 4' -6" PAY LIMITS EXCAVATION ONL NOTE: 1. PERFORATED PIPE FOR SUBSURFACE 2. SEE SECTION 5.01 K.C.R.S. 3. IF FACENOFwROCKE A MINIMUM OF 10' FROM TRAVELED ROCKERY DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 12" OUTLET PIPE RUDED CONCRETE CURB DETAIL SCALE 1:6 BATTER FABRIC 2' LEVEL BENCH ORIGINAL GROUND 7 ..,,;;Ij - • B" MIN. THICKNESS OF 2" -4" QUARRY SPALLS GRAVEL BACK FILL FOR DRAINS -f<1 =1 fi -If► it f__ 11 -Ri__ PAY LIMITS EXCAVATION ONLY 1/2 BASE COURSE DIAMETER OR 17'. WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 6"PERF. DRAIN PIPE WRAPPED WITH FILTER FABRIC. 4" MIN. OF ROCK UNDER PIPE NOTE: 1. PERFORATED PIPE FOR SUBSURFACE WATER. 2. SEE SECTION 5.01 K.C.R.S. 3. IF ROCKERY OR RETAINING WALL IS BEHIND ROLLED CURB OR ON A RURAL SECTION, FACE OF ROCKERY OR RETAINING WALL MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10' FROM TRAVELED WAY. KERY DETAIL SCALE 12" OUTLET PIPE 0 m 0 z 0 co J za Lt 0 CL c W I- 0 0 CC z I.d_ 1 z o c w o BRIAN WOLLASTON Xrefs: File: 5243DET ALUMINUM AND P.V.C. PIPE, AND SECTION 9- 30.7(1)A FOR - CONCRETE PIPE. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 92% MINIMUM DRY DENSITY PER A.S.T.M. D -1557- 70. 15. ALL PIPE SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION ACCORDING TO WASHINGTON STATE SPECIFICATION 7- 02.3(1). THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY LEVELING OF THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS WELL AS PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. IF THE NATIVE MATERIAL IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR "GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR PIPE BEDDING," THE FIRST LEFT OF PIPE BEDDING MAY BE OMITTED, PROVIDED THE MATERIAL IN THE BOTTOM THE TRENCH IS LOOSENED, REGRADED, A COMPACTED TO FORM A DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. 16. ALL BUILDING ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MAIN STORM DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM THROUGH AN UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM. ROOF DRAINS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE SEPARATE SYSTEMS AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 6" (OR 8" DIAMETER WHERE SHOWN) P.V.C. (RIGID, NONPERFORATED FOR ROOF DRAINS, PERFORATED FOR FOOTING DRAINS.) SUFFICIENT CLEANOUTS AND BENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE SYSTEM CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. THE SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS SCHEMATIC ONLY. THE DRAINAGE /GRADING CONTRACTOR OR LANDSCAPER MAY ALTER THE LAYOUT AS REQUIRED TO BETTER DRAIN THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A DIMENSIONED RECORD OF THE LOCATION OF ALL PIPES AND CLEANOUTS AND SUBMIT SAME TO THE CITY, ENGINEER, AND OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. 17. ALL ROOF AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE FIELD AND ADJUSIED AS NECESSARY TO AVOID IMPACTING THE EXISTING TREES DENOTED ON THE GRADING PLAN TO BE SAVED. DRAIN UNES SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE DRIPUNE OF TREES TO BE SAVED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 18. THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. 19. STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING LINE OF ANY STORM DRAIN PIPE. 20. CONSTRUCTION OF DEWATERING (GROUNDWATER) SYSTEM, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE A.P.W.A. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 61 -3.02, 1981 EDMON. 21. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE PERMANENT STORM DRAINAGE SYSILM MUST BE CLEANED OUT BY PUMPING. (DO NOT PUMP OR DISPOSE INTO ANY OTHER STREAM, STORM SEWER, OR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM.) 22. RIP RAP ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION SHALL BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK PLACED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF ONE (1) FOOT. ROCK AGGREGATE TO BE AS FOLLOWS: 1/2" - 2" - 10% - 40% 2" - 4" - 20% - 40% 4` - 8" - 40% - 70% 23. TESTING OF ALL STORM SEWER PIPE WILL BE AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 24. WHEN PLAIN ALUMINUM PIPE OR PIPE ARCH IS USED WHERE IT WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR CONCRETE PIPE, ALL ALUMINUM SURFACES IN CONTACT WITH THE CONCRETE OR CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE PAINTED WITH TWO COATS OF PAINT. THE ALUMINUM PIPE TO BE PAINTED SHALL BE CLEANED WITH SOLVENT TO REMOVE CONTAMINANTS. AFTER CLEANING, THE PIPE SHALL BE PAINTED WITH TWO COATS OF PAINT CONFORMING TO FEDERAL SPECIFICATION TT -P -645 (PRIMER, PAINT, ZINC CHROMATE, ALKYD VEHICLE.) . SIDE'- tEWERS SHALL BE MINIMUM DIAM AT 2.0% MINI UM SL PE B. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE TESTED FOR LEAKAGE AT THE SAME TIME THE Mi SEWER IS TESTED. IF NOT TESTED TOGETHER, PROVIDE TEST TEES AT S MAIN CONNECTIONS. C. BUILDINGS WITH GREATER THAN 10 UNIT SHALL BE SERVICED BY ONE OF FOLLOWING METHODS: 1. DOUBLE 6` DIAMETER SERVICES CONNECTED TO TRUCK BY STANDAN TEES OR INTO MANHOLES. 2. SINGLE 8" DIAMETER SERVICE WITH CLEANOUT, CONNECTED TO TRU INTO MANHOLES ONLY. (ALTERNATE CONNEC110N METHODS ARE DEPICTED ON PLANS.) D. ALL LATERAL CONNECTIONS TO SEWER MAINS SHALL BE MADE WITH A WY SWEEPING TEE. 11. CONSTRUCTION OF DEWATERING (GROUNDWATER) SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDA WITH THE A.P.W.A STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 61 -3.02, 1981 EDMON. 12. WHENEVER SEWERS MUST CROSS UNDER WATER MAIN THE SEWER SHALL BE LA SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE TOP OF THE SEWER LINE IS AT LEAST 36 INCH THE BOTTOM ON THE WATER MAIN. 13. BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING LINE OF SANITARY SEWER PIPE. 14. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL GRANT 10' WIDE SANITARY SEWE EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA 15. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE FOR LATERALS EP THE PUBUC RIGHT -OF -WAY. OfIADNG COAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION," WASHINGTO STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBUC WORKS ASSOCIA WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER, 1988 EDMON. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDfl1( THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. 2. AN APPROVED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCT] IN PROGRESS. 3. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IN Cr RIGHT -OF -WAY. 4. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (433 -1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTION MEET] 5. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UT1U11ES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABUSHED FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFOR] CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. fi IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY ALL Ui1UTY LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY 011 UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION C PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATIO SERVICE (1- 800 - 424 -5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS R TVE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFUCT EXISTS. 6. THE TEMPORARY EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE CON STRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANT WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS. TH FACIUTIES MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS P 7. ALL EARTHWORK UNDER PAVING TO BE USED BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 95% DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY PER A.S.T.M. D- 1557 -70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR). 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS ON THE. PI ARE TOP OF PAVING. , S ERS SHALL BE 6" MINIMUM DIAMETER AT 2 :o7; MINIMUM SLOPE. SEWERS SHALL BE TESTED FOR LEAKAGE AT THE SAME TIME THE MAIN UNE ER IS TESTED. IF NOT TESTED TOGETHER, PROVIDE TEST TEES AT SEWER I CONNECTIONS. )INGS WITH GREATER THAN 10 UNIT SHALL BE SERVICED BY ONE OF THE _OWING METHODS: DOUBLE 6" DIAMETER SERVICES CONNECTED TO TRUCK BY STANDARD TEES OR INTO MANHOLES. SINGLE 8" DIAMETER SERVICE WITH CLEANOUT, CONNECTED TO TRUNK INTO MANHOLES ONLY. (ALTERNATE CONNECTION METHODS ARE DEPICTED ON PLANS.) LATERAL CONNECTIONS TO SEWER MAINS SHALL BE MADE WITH A WYE OR :EPING TEE. HON OF DEWATERING (GROUNDWATER) SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE A.P.W.A STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 61 -3.02, 1981 EDITION. SEWERS MUST CROSS UNDER WATER MAIN THE SEWER SHALL BE LAID AT ELEVATION THAT THE TOP OF THE SEWER LINE IS AT LEAST 36 INCHES BELOW DM ON THE WATER MAIN. SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING LINE OF ANY SEWER PIPE. OCCUPANCY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL GRANT 10' WIDE SANITARY SEWER S TO THE CFIY OF TUKWILA. 3 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE FOR LATERALS ENTERING JC RIGHT -OF -WAY. LIB AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD ONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION," WASHINGTON ARDENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, N STATE CHAPTER, 1988 EDITION. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF )F TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. ED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS SS. E THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE )THER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IN CITY WAY. NY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING IT (433 -1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. )NS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY JEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE D APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE ILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ' LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER IOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS E CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION 1 -800- 424 -5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTA BE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. RARY EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE CON PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS. THESE MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSIRUCTION AND NG IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. IORK UNDER PAVING TO BE USED BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHALL BE ) TO MINIMUM 95% DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY PER A.S.T.M. D- 1557 -70 PROCTOR). HERWISE NOTED, ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS ON THE PLANS )F PAVING. LATEST REVISION, CEMENT MOWN? LINING ANU StAL UuANNu TO A.N.S.I. A- 21.4• -74 ( A.W.W.A C104 -74), OR LATEST REVISION. B. PIPE JOINTS TO BE PUSHED -ON, MECHANICAL OR FLANGE JOINTS. C. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE FITTINGS TO BE CEMENT LINED, CLASS 250 CAST IRON, CONFORMING TO A.N.S.I. A -21.10 AND A- 021.11 -77, OR LATEST REVISION, D. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE BEDDING TO BE A.P.W.A CLASS "C". E. ALL WATER MAIN CEMENT CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS TO CONFORM TO STANDARD DETAILS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. F. ALL WATER MAIN TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 92% DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY PER A.S.T.M. D- 1557 -70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) PRIOR TO TESTING WATER MAINS FOR ACCEPTANCE. 9. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE 10" AND SMALLER TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM COVER AT 36 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE. WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS OCCUR, WATER MAINS ARE TO BE LOWERED TO CLEAR. 10. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED AND DISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS. ALL INSPECTION AND PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE DONE IN THE PRESENCE OF, AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF, THE CITY ENGINEER AND /OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. 11. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PLUGS AND /OR TEMPORARY BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLIES FOR TESTING AND PURITY ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO FINAL TIE IN. 12. FIRE HYDRANTS: A. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD PLAN NOS. W -3, W -4, W -5, AND W -6. 8. ALL FIRE HYDRANT PORTS SHALL FACE PERPENDICULAR TO CURB AND TOWARD DRIVEWAY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 13. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES: A. ALL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ONES TO BE TYPE "K" COPPER, STANDARD GALVANIZED, STEEL PIPE, OR PVC PIPE. SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD PLAN NO. 202 OR NO. 203 (DOUBLE STRAPS AND CORPORATION STOPS). B. METER BOXES TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. C. METERS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 14. BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING UNE OF AMY WATER MAIN. 15. ALL WATER MAINS NOT IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY REQUIRE 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMBITS TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 16. ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR DUCTILE, WITH FLANGED OR MECHANICAL ANT CONNECTION, AND BE THE SAME THICKNESS CLASS AS THE PIPE USED. 17. LIVE TAPS TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUC TION. 18. ALL PIPE FITTINGS TO BE LISTED AND LABELED U.S. FOR FIRE SERVICE; INSTALLED, TESTED AND FLUSHED AS SPECIFIED BY NFPA STANDARDS NO. 13 AND NO. 24. PROPERLY COMPLETED CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL AND TEST CERTIFICATES ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO WASHINGTON SURVEYING AND RATING BUREAU AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA. OVERFLOW ELEVATION - TO PROVIDE DETENTION AND OIL SEPARATION EL =36.00 PIPE SUPPORT -- —, CLEANOUT GATE — A) SHEAR GATE, IRON BODY BRONZE MTD. OLYMPIC FDY. STD. B) LEFT GATE, f f C /C /I - LG, CASCADE CULVERT INC. OR C) OTHER DEVICE APPROVED BY ENGINEER 3232 CAP STD GALV. STEEL OR ALUMINUM LADDER /STE 72' CON SCALE: 1" = =2' DETENTION F NOT TO SCALE Nli .brAU WNti)KM LATEST REVISION. R FLANGE JOINTS. _INED, CLASS 250 CAST IRON, 1 -77, OR LATEST REVISION; :LASS `C". )CKS TO CONFORM TO )MPACTED TO MINIMUM 92% ) (MODIFIED PROCTOR) PRIOR TO A MINIMUM COVER AT 36 INCHES 1CCUR, WATER MAINS ARE TO BE ISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH fH DEPARTMENT AND CITY OF TESTING SHALL BE DONE IN THE CITY ENGINEER AND /OR HIS BLOW —OFF ASSEMBLIES FOR IN. fY OF TUKWILA STANDARD PLAN ICULAR TO CURB AND TOWARD E "IC COPPER, STANDARD CE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IN PLAN NO. 202 OR NO. 203 s,CTOR. VILA. OF THE SPRING UNE OF ANY DIRE 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMENTS FLANGED OR MECHANICAL JOINT 3 THE PIPE USED. 8 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUC OR FIRE SERVICE; INSTALLED, ■RDS NO. 13 AND NO. 24. TEST CERTIFICATES ARE TO BE JREAU AND THE CITY OF 'A 1 LN CHAIN I V" 1 -KAMt' OVERFLOW ELEVATION TO PROVIDE DETENTION AND OIL SEPARATION EL =36.00 PIPE SUPPORT CLEANOUT GATE A) SHEAR GATE, IRON BODY BRONZE MTD. OLYMPIC FDY. STD. OR B) LEFT GATE, #C /C /I — LG, CASCADE CULVERT INC. OR C) OTHER DEVICE APPROVED BY ENGINEER 32.32 CAP STD GALV. STEEL OR 6 12" OUTLET PIPE 12" RISER n' a d 4 0.15' NO H WEIR EL =35.50 (10 YR) 3.1" DIA ORIFICE EL= 35.12(2 YR.) ALUMINUM LADDER /STEPS CAP 6" RISER NOTES: 1) PIPE SIZES & SLOPES, SEE PLANS. 2 OUTLET CAPACITY NOT LESS THAN COMBINED INLETS 3) METAL A) CORROSIOPARTS: N RESISTANT OR GAL- VANIZED OR ALUMINIZED TYPE II 6 TO B) IF GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, PLATE LA 4) FRAME V& LADDER OR STEPS I. OFFSET SO: A) CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE E J 4 41 4 \\...IE= 32.32 72' CONTROL STRUCTURE FROM TOP. B) CLIMBDOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER & CLEANOUT GATE. C) FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB. 5) STRUCTURE SHALL BE A TYPE II CATCH BASIN MINIMUM. 1.2" DIA. ORIFICE ® EL= 30.32 SCALE: 1" =2' 50' 37 32.7 IE =32.70 0 N r- DETENTION POND PLAN + PROFILE 6 6 El NO1 NOT TO SCALE SECTION 4OTES: 'IPE SIZES & SLOPES, SEE PLANS. CUTLET CAPACITY. NOT LESS THAN OMBINED INLETS IETAL PARTS: ,) CORROSION RESISTANT OR GAL- VANIZED OR ALUMINIZED TYPE II, 3) W GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT L "RAME & LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET SO: CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP. B) CLIMBDOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER & CLEANOUT GATE. C) FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB. STRUCTURE SHALL BE A TYPE II CATCH BASIN MINIMUM. a,r 34'0'0" 52'0'0" 12_'0'0" 6" TO PLLAALESCING PLAN VIEW CB No 4 _12" INLET PIPE 1 " =2' REMOVABLE WATER -TIGHT COUPLING 12" RISER PLATE WITH ORIFICE AS SPEC. ELBOW DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 67.20' 50' , X, \ IE =32.70 SECTION yousio IE =32.70 - -0.5' DEAD STORAGE ELEV =32.20 tlAtt 2 3 i ++ Si TUKWILA �,� runic � \ -), i<s RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 2 3 1995 PERMIT CENTER CC N W w M LL. 0 0 N AS —SHOWN 0 0 AS —SHOWN N 0 0 -0 N 0 0 0 0 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH Job Number 0 Pico ri?e,P6-w77-- //v. pos 7,('E eS To pr; E yo&/7-:)) 717.- -- >.- pxo ,po,t-:,- r, L. r . --••••••- • 0 - j••••••/- • rit • .,,,0••• • /SI kleApg //-4 677 ;SECTION B / /e2 c2" / (7/ 0 Li: /A..„,, . . -t• • /-g-.5 • n.5&-nq S. 12E o. (:Fo .DC),o1 lz.S 1:4 At-C. F S • 0% - 50'74, , Ac )76,Ac tko /N 13-r 1- /--(-/--/ (-7/ /■,IS- E /41A 7 e). e.p frvi S. 128th Street 4.>"/" / i VAN OLT " e -7" /701W l? /// c r er2 e:) 1,1-0,PO4 e , x---72, .;•(/ " fro - ,• 770 /A,/, - • r,c?or:;,.,-; e F a r: Ileac/1J /7 S'4,47(...ke,L; . 4-1 • <- _ ,.,.;g•ti-1 .„; x • x • SECTION A ; _1_ '- o" (<,Beria 1-9 A' ■•• P'e-- A iv Ti (,e--It'a iv 2) /"-- 12-av iv i" / /VAN' L y ION A P/) r0 e., Ftr, 1r 1`,.; REVISIONS LANDSCAPE ARCHITF:LitIRE ShE PLANNING LYNN WILLIAM I 10KN. ASIA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCDITECT • OFFICE 10828 GRAVELLY LAKE DRIVE SW Suim 103 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 206.582. OW POST 0 ei Iox 98907 TACOMA, WASIIIN., 98,198*(1007 -a t lrfa.EDfPENATIONAL NO.6103ACTe•24X30 /471 ir/, To fp irA Landscape Planting Plan l:•. e. 1 ".. • wog %ape :Planting Plan c-vvers'" .cc: CCf w /ri ! i %J` r LE_ / r•' mil' % ....,ti:� it! i. c • 17; w N/A_ t.ttter, RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 18 1995 PERMIT CENTER STATE OF WASNINGT • 1,, CAPS R�¢t1fcr t1(,rl ate rr', L .. CHECKED SCALE 20/_0. LYNN WILLIAM HORN CERTIFICATE NO. 419 /- 15- fair ea L/ucJeA'I SHEET L- 1 9HEETS Ppv►ri'TtvNrp Fve...6. 4.1170 as 4► Mu wt! 000thp ID P01014e=C7 bp,Apr go rm. Yo 1420/1604, ci¢i' N ' Gam. ?d, o. .troi fop or Pool t 4 - 6i' P4' ,l • or rid+ITPrf •o -rnr4ou t, pvacr a.l,. eacHtt o. r- +cv Mfteleb -Tor+6ocr.. AFrritiLMI 1-** Dr ;14L-1004 i t- Z.' 11UL 1 6/4.1C411- tug No 4 t.e • -ed/ 5.rA I A- 1," -x_:� ;. Cj, �/ //— a ' 7Ayrii4p /.�60-- / 4c erAsm jawipef..: V/ � rJ�'h7U� =r�! � j�+-i � v�f�7�45'tl �?p lam. V I �`, /-1-7. co p .. ©erf ?/ 'G & ;kr.r /i /L, 7`,,A/42 6rppe.4 ir' ' %';r . 1 59 A P/ Nos X711•1 ply 2-0 Hut-al cot 6Aucosr- Mitioye, Istoti.o.r. Mem Tar t itcar &q.t. ANwep- 4r6 Hgrreo • ter A GO- IDgerif 44-004101, 444"4,. Fbito.p. PrA.0110-1To PINIVIW.0 itA(M t Pr $ eRr.t.40(44) w1,fri40 dpitArnite &potnipcovele 156 Efldj .011114. ONO ce HAM, r1124iNp loreot, rat iotipula*. :Contractor shall obtair • required for any wor landscape and irrigatic 2. Verity locations of al] work as required, upon • .design consultant(s) ar Ntrify location of all • •Bring all adverse.6ondJ to LA, architects and/c •iorrectiOns/Modificatic 'contractors shall ( regulations as require( this,project Occurs wil iScope of work shall in and related items nece! toil preparation, ben grading of topsoil, placement of specified Vitamin 8-1, staking al protection, maintenano material, clean-up, del or incidental to compli Land. Contractor shall Service prior to any Wi Should any errors drawings or specificat: cont. shall immediatel! owner, prior to proceei 3. Abbreviations for Jilts] o.c.-on center, B&B...ba: ht.a.sheigth, sprd.=sprel minomminimum, LAN.Landsl 4. All groundcover shall 1 shown below: H.T.S. 5. Plant as per details p: LA only. Bring any pro) to'changes. Areas of. s' LA's attention. 6. Rototill the existini topsoil placement,in a Rake off all rocks 2" • 3-way mix topsoil or a: bad and lawn -areas,— 12" layer of topsoil. T] thus adding a total of tore than the minimum to be flush with the ti iToreon.,. •14-1,&44.. pe Ads td ...ftrie,AuuJr, p44• *E46-2t7 • Xn the planting of the •groundcovers the folio; This topsoil mixture sl ,Specified topsoil with 'screened soils, with a: these • 'soils together. I incieting soils, on st1 •Verify with general col exported .from site. De' Source of the topsoi: delivery. StEip all existing placement or rototillii • plant bads shall'be to . to "planting, and shal: 7. plant pits ,shall be tw • i■-• 4 ..114.S. Ts't Sigre-25; /44://t/ -...:,144--- il77,-;""iik .-,'0*4.i* •,,::.:.:.--,,t Ai:.Q)ct.-:14..,.(ic, . ./. , f:-.-1.7-0S7Q•',47..pe?(..--f-:rit.i.=-.Y lei;.- •z.f44.- i-4. CO . 0,-q. ; •, _ ,1?). 7; Cols477, et 1,C., ,,' i.:„..,..:„.. . . - , -, . A • At., JI-. / f /J1 / El iii;-.1. 1 a.. ---,--.•;ea'r? ' - Specifications: 1. Contractor shall obtain all permits and pay any fees as required for any work associated with the landscape and irrigation work as shown. 2. Verify locations of all utilities prior to any work. Adjust work as required, upon approval of the LA, other appropriate design consultant(s) and /or owner. •Verify location of all easements prior to any work. Bring all adverse conditions, as soon as possible, to LA, architects and /or owner's attention, prior to corrections /modifications. Contractors shall conform and comply with all regulations as required by the governmental agencies, which this project occurs within. Scope of work shall include all materials, labor, equipment, and related items necessary to accomplish the subgrade and soil preparation, berm fill materials, placement and grading of topsoil, placement of specified plant materials, fertilizer, Vitamin B -1, staking and mulching, appropriate protection, maintenance, guarantee and replacement of plant material, clean -up, debris removal, and any items necessary ;or incidental to complete the work shown and specified. Land. Contractor shall call Underground Utilities Locator Service prior to any work. Should any errors or conflicts be present between the drawings or specifications and on site conditions, the land. cont. shall immediately notify the LA, architect and /or owner, prior to proceeding with work. 3. .Abbreviations for interpretation of landscape plans: o.c.=on center, B &Beballed & burlapped, cont.econtainer, ht.eheigth, sprd.=spread, cal.ecaliper, N.T.S.enot to scale min.=minimun, LAeLandscape Architect, max. =maximum. 4. All groundcover shall be planted using triangle spacing as shown below: N.T.S. Equal spacing 5. Plant as per details provided, adjustments will be by the LA only. Bring any proposed changes to LA's attention prior to changes. Areas of . standing water shall be brought to the LA's attention. 6. Rototill the existing soil to a depth of 6" prior to any topsoil placement,in all groundcover planting beds -and - -- Sawn -- - - areas -,-- -- Rake off all rocks 2" diameter and larger. Place 2" depth of . 3 -way mix topsoil or approved equal in these new groundcover bed and Rototill into the subgrade soils this 1,2" layer of topsoil. Then place another 2" layer of topsoil, thus adding a total of 4" of topsoil. Some beds may require more than the minimum 4" depth of topsoil, adjust as required, to be flush with the tons of curbs, aavina, sidewalks, etc... Toro► emu. 1e hANlL,FA�Tulae al, No y-1EIET c, o4,4c j'tPrAt_WF, Wo+ 848 -2371 • In the planting of the trees, shrubs and 1 gallon can groundcovers the following topsoil mixture shall be used. This topsoil mixture shall be a total of 75% of the above specified topsoil with the balance being 25% of the onsite screened soils, with all rocks 2" and larger removed. Mix thecae soils together. Dispose of all remaining unused existing soils, on site if possible. Verify with general contractor if unused soils need to be exported from site. Determine this prior to bidding. Source of the topsoil shall be approved by the LA prior to delivery. StEip all existing weeds /grasses prior to any topsoil placement or rototilling. Remove all debris from site. Plant beds shall be to the satisfaction of the LA prior" to planting, and shall only occur after approval of such. 7. Plant pits shall be twice the size of the rootballs,ht. and Width. Plant as shown in details. Scarify 6" of soil unciar 12. The correction of--all drainage prol is part of this contract. Landscape contractor shall be respi for establishing appropriate grade water shall not collect in any p1 against buildings and walks. 13. Any substitutions, deleations, etc by LA. 14. Contractor shall provide the owner 'on all plant materials and workman: Guarantee shall begin upon final a+ Maintain all plantings until final It is the landscape contractors re . site meeting, at the conclusion of period, with the owner and the lan 15. Vandalisn corrections are not the contractor, however land. cont. sh to protect all work durin fencing/roping as required. 16. Contractor shall provide the LA wi following inspections: 1. Preconstruction meeting, after 2. Inspection of fine finished gra 3. Plant materials inspection. 4. Final inspection. These inspections can occur area b These inspections are required. It responsibility to call the LA and cost of these inspections will be owner. 17. Do not prune any existing vege materials; without the direction of 18. See all grading, engineering, Arch 19-. All-finished-grades-shall-be-as-Re be- as - -pe accepted codes for the- drat -- anoe be 20. All plantings shall be _ irrigat attached irrigation plans. 21. Provide ern acurate "As- Built draw and irrigation work to the LA, upo work. 22. Obtain all bonds as required by th to perform work as shown. 23. Any slopes 2:1 (Horiz.:vert) and planted with trees, shrubs or grou with jute net matting, installed a recommendations. See civil plans slopes. 24._Tnetall "Deep. Root" root growth ba manufacturers recommendations, at 4.11z s WITHIN] Ter-1 FEET of Akly FAVI h as shown on the plans.Call K -C sal 483 -8317 for further information a 25. Landscape Contractor shall provide which this project occurs, with an "As- Built•" or "Revised Plan" infor may be required, at the completion landscape, work. 26. All permits and bonds, as may be r county, in which this project occu available at the-times required by provided for by the landscape cont --2.7, Lawn sa,e.al be as grown by Emerald Puyallup, WA. or approved equal. I maintain as per the growers recomi 2s4 Verify with the landscape architec existing plants, on site, prior tc 29; All lawn adjacent-to-the-buildings - __the-_bui1d$ng- €eund.at-ions..._•_.._.__._ orrection of_all drainage problems in all plant beds rt of this contract. cape contractor shall be responsible stablishing appropriate grades to assure that all shall not collect in any plant pits oY plant beds or st buildings and walks. ubstitutions, deleations, etc... shall be approved only actor shall provide the owner with a one year guarantee 1 plant materials and workmanship. ntee shall begin upon final acceptance by LA. in all plantings until final acceptance by the LA. the landscape contractors responsibility to arrange a neeting, at the conclusion of the one year guarantee 1, with the owner and the landscape architect, onsite. Lisa corrections are not the responsiblity of the actor, however land. cont. shall take every precaution )rotect all work during construction. Provide ig /roping as required. actor shall provide the LA with 72 hour notice on the ring inspections: :construction meeting, after contract signed. apection of fine finished grades, prior to planting. (nt materials inspection. ml inspection. inspections can occur area by area, as required. inspections are required. It is the contractors Is.bility to call the LA and schedule a tune. The t these inspections will be the responsibility of the t prune any existing vegetation or new landscape ales without the direction of the LA and /or owner. 1 grading, engineering, Arch. site, and utility plans. n I- shed- T rades- aha1-l-- be -ae -- per- -- the-- -H- BC-- Oode -; - and loca y__ ect codes-- -fer -- the- -d#ste tee- below-bwi: ding- s-id-rng: lantings shall be-irrigated as shown on the ad irrigation plans. a an acurate "As- Built" drawing of the final landscape rigation work to the LA, upon final approval of the all bonds as required by the state and local codes, form work as shown. Lopes 2:1 (Hors z .: vert) and steeper which shall be 1 with trees, shrubs or groundcovers shall be covered ate net matting, installed as per the manufacturers :ndations. See civil plans for the proposed "PDeep_ Root "_root growth barrier material as per_ the :turers recommendations, at the base of all 41111-1,,4 Ter1 FAT cfAkiy rAvi rki a rn on the plans.Call K -C sales, Kirkland, WA. .7 for further information and costs. tpe Contractor shall provide the City or County, in .hi.s project occurs, with any and all appropriate It" or "Revised Plan" information /drawings that required, at the completion of the project, for all Ipe work. nits and bonds, as may be required by the City or in which this project occurs, shall be paid for and am at the -times required by the governing body, and :d for by the landscape contractor. '',N.1 iU0_..aa.. -grown by--- Emerald -.Turf caress- - Fa-rms.u___ - -_ -up WA. - or approved --o qua]. - I- nsta1- l-- r-- -water_.and- --- -- tin as - per..the .. growers-- r-eoonmsndat3.one.--- • - - - -- ' with the landscape architect, the retention of all .ng plants, on site, prior to removal of any. twn adjacent-to-the-buildings .shall._. _wi 1-bi n. REVISIONS MEM OM= LYNN WILLIAM HORN ,tS a%11li SJr1: P1.1fimst; LYNN WILLIAM I /)lei, MLA 1;1-xas -rani I.-1NIA-(:Arti Aftoorres OFvux I[X1rii(iitAY11.I,YInas Dicnig SW Sttin 103 1 1t1J.elA,WASt(1wzt N 2(ki •:'4(~'• (no MMI. POST ()F'kiCK Ikix 9€0;1 TAamtA, 1t'n;iUtvr;ftirV91149/1.1x1(7 1 • • ir• r ' ';,;•may -- "':`' r b = 7 r l A S'U *,/SE -y /z0-17 twA I cfk • • .; CoNT G?rf, 79 vtie—r 4 N7.7'i . pp../�' L.95- cos& **WaltOil.n1AL; 010:. StO$A`CTR•24X34 • .04/ tooGro-fi tz,kr) a-gl)At 7 J yr) ' I aD ,.S'U h/SE--7"'/ f- 0-6 '? t wbc- V P / V / wor w►Af-'� CMG,, 14/1,sei/ 11X-1; NT, 13,, 3.' '4., A ro, ' ? V ;J 741,4- #4iriq 776S; iz ' °f e, 7b E.rP1> problem: to the l `taking : iropose( Upon not problem. No pia) prolong: a wet o] accepts: 8. Fertili1 release recomsae: 9. All mull adjoinii Mulch el ;trees, 1 Mulch al Horthwe PP1Y lantim pply a; eliver, 11. pacing, ield gal of tl 10. pv*,�,;;rrasA;'.!�a...v cvs "�:`iiic•iss�awYQ- :�•�::+.°.-.: roblema,.;: if; any.. problems.encountered they shall be'brought to the •LA's attention for correction, prior to the contractor taking :any actions. • !roposed drainage solutions shall be approved by the LA, bpg:n'notification by the landscape contractor that there is a problem. Np• plants will be allowed to be planted during times of prolonged freezing, and during times which the topsoil is in a•wet or muddy condition. Plant only during times of locally accepted practice.'Stake trees as shown in the details. • Fertilize all trees and shrubs and 1 gallon groundcovers: with slow release formula fertilizer tablets, 20 -10 -5, as per manufacturers ecamaendations. Agrifora brand tablets or approved equal. • All,mulah in plant beds shall be approximately 1/2" below all 'ad'joining hard surfaces, roads edges, top of curbs, etc... k�ulch, shall occur only'in all plant beds in which tr.e ,'shrubs and, groundcover plants only occur. tloh shali.be 2" depth of Nutramulch as manufactured by orthwest Cascade, Puyallup, WA., Or approved equal. pply.. itamin . 8 -1 root stimulator to plants prior to lanting,of any plants. • pply:antidesicant, to:.plants•at the nursery, prior to • eliveryto site.. . . paahge of all plants. shall kie. as . per the plan and will . be 1el'd adjusted •by the landscape, contractor, with approv- 1 of the LA •onsite. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 18 1995 PERMIT CENTER • 1 0 10 1 " =20' 20 40 \ ' RO!"OE TEMP0RM1:Y ERIIP;SIONJ • FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOTES: 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST, WITH MINIMUM 6 -INCH OVERLAP, AND SECURELY FASTENED AT BOTH ENDS TO POST. 2. POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND (MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). 3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED APPROXIMATELY 8 INCHES WIDE AND 12 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS AND UP SLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. 4. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED, A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UP SLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG, TIE WIRES OR HOG RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. 5. THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR WIRED TO THE FENCE, AND 20 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES. 6. WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSE POST SPACING IS USED, THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE ELIMINATED. IN SUCH A CASE, THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE POSTS WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ABOVE NOTES APPLYING. 7. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED BEFORE THE UP SLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 8. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMFfIATFI Y INSTALL MIRAFI FILTER - FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL THIS SHEET (TYP) PRO:;:OSED PARKING LOT A Y EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CO TROL ^L. • SS o. SS INSTALL MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL THIS SHEET (TYP) co c.5 a h• O' h 8 0 0 SS - -- SS w A, I (o' 4 I tea. 000000000 0000000•' • 00000001 b so I J� ■ S89'59'31" E ms's j 9; / O IE 15.95 0000000 IE =35.75 NSTALL 40 LF 8" CULVERT ■ 4' O• o° aft, INSTALL TEMPORARY`" CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL THIS SHEET INSTALL TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR SWALE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET '�- ----- YPICAL) 38 / C NTROL PLA a• pia INSTAL FABRI THIS MIRAFI FILTER FENCE PER DETAIL HEET (TYP) <0' C 38. 3S S89'59'31" E 55.75 CEPTOR SHEET 38 7 INSTALL TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR SWALE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET (TYPICAL) INSTALL TEMPORA EDIMENT -P` to PER DET' THIS S (TYPICAL) 0 IN ALL MIRAFI FILTER ABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL THIS 40 -_ _�� SHEET (TYP.) InICTAI I (R PR(1TFe.TICAI bo_ F LEGALE ESSICO SHORT 1 RECORD SHORT NOTE BASIS ( C{E.M VERTICA BENCH SURVEY LEG TEMPOF ENTRAN MIRAFI INTERCI RIP RA EXISTIN PRnPn z ' J Z CC w ° W CD CO ® 0 0 w Elm w 0 IL Z z 0 cc cc w Z co Cr w 0 w LEGAL DESCRIPTION N ESSICO ADDIliON TO RIVERTON LOT B OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT No. 90 -4 —SS RECORDING No. 91011404003 OF SAID SHORT PLAT DFA— TRACT1. BBAASIIS OF BEARINGS, ASSUMED N 00'03'50" E Q E. MARGINAL WAY PER KING COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP. VERTICAL DATUM BENCHMARK PER BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, P.S., INC. SURVEY FOR WHITELY — JACOBSEN & ASSOC. 11/19/74 LEGEND: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WRAF! FILTER FENCE INTERCEPTOR SWALE RIP RAP PAD EXISTING CONTOURS Q z z 0 0 c w 0 File: 811/4Ei&3 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1 "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS" FOR THIS PLAN SHALL BE 1991 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION AS PUBLISHED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION (APWA), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED AND /OR AMENDED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT BY THE SCHEME SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS FOR THE SCHEME SHOWN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST, REPAIR AND UPGRADE SILTATION CONTROL FACILITIES AS WEATHER CONDITIONS CHANGE AND AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 3. CLEARING AND GRADING LIMITS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COINCIDENT WITH THE LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. CLEARING AND GRADING WILL BE NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. 4. IF STOCKPILED TOPSOIL AND FILL MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE SITE IS DETERMINED TO REMAIN MORE THAN 24 HOURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COVER ALL STOCKPILE AREAS AND DISTURBED AREAS CONTIGUOUS WITH CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY DURING THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1 THROUGH MARCH 31. IN ADDITION, ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS INCLUDING PROPOSED STREET RIGHTS -OF -WAY ON THE SITE SHALL BE COVERED WITH CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY DURING THE SEASONAL PERIOD DESCRIBED PREVIOUSLY. THE CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 9 -14.5 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. COVERING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TIGHTLY IN PLACE BY USING SAND BAGS OR TIES ON ROPES WITH THE MAXIMUM 10 -FOOT GRID SPACING IN ALL DIRECTIONS. ALL SEAMS SHALL BE TAPED OR WEIGHTED DOWN FULL LENGTH AND THEIR SHALL BE AT LEAST A 12 -INCH OVERLAP OF ALL SEAMS. ALL COVERINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY INSTALLED UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORKDAY ACTIVITIES DURING THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1 TO MARCH 31, AND /OR REMAIN UNTIL VEGETATION IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. IF STOCKPILED TOPSOIL AND /OR FILL MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM THE SITE IS DETERMINED TO REMAIN MORE THAN 6 MONTHS, ALL SLOPES AND SURFACES OF THE FILL SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED, MULCH, ETC., ALL DISTURBED AREAS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE ENTIRE STORM RETENTION FACILITY AND ASSOCIATED SIDE SLOPES AFTER COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. MULCHING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF HAY OR STRAW SPREAD AT A 2 -INCH DEPTH OF WOOD FIBER CELLULOSE SPREAD AT 25 TO 35 POUNDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. MULCHING MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING PROCESS. SHOULD SEEDING AND MULCHING PROCESS BE PERFORMED DURING THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30, CLEAR PLASTIC COATING MAY NOT BE REQUIRED DEPENDING UPON WEATHER CONDITIONS. SHOULD SEEDING AND MULCHING BE PERFORMED AFTER OCTOBER 1, THEN CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER APPLICATION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR PROPOSE ALTERNATIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FROM THE DESCRIBED REQUIREMENTS, PRIOR APPROVAL MUST BE GRANTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 5. UNDER SUPERVISION BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING SITE TO ENSURE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE ADEQUATE AS WEATHER AND SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE. 6. TRACKED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OPERATED ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 10:1 SUCH THAT CLEAT MARKS SHALL RUN PERPENDICULAR TO DOWNHILL SLOPES (CONTOURED). 7. LOCATE INTERCEPTOR SWALES OR DIKES DOWNSLOPE OF THE BUILDING FOUNDATION AS NEEDED SUCH THAT RUNOFF SHALL BE DIRECTED AND RETAINED ON SITE. 8. ALL CUT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSLOPE OF INTERCEPTOR DIKES OR SWALES SUCH THAT RUNOFF FROM MATERIAL SHALL REMAIN QN SITE. STOCKPILED CUT MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN NOTE NO. 4 ABOVE. 9. PUBLIC STREETS ABUTTING SITE SHALL BE CHECKED AND /OR CLEANED A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY 24 HOURS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN UP ANY SOIL OR SEDIMENTS FOUND. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: CONTRACTOR TO ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. ESTABLISH GRADING LIMITS. 3. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL FILTER FABRIC FENCE, SEDIMENTATION TRAP. 4. PROCEED WITH GRADING ACTIVITIES. 5. INSTALL ROCKERY. 6. INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND DETENTION POND. 7. PROCEED WITH FINE GRADING. 8. PAVE PARKING AREA AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 9. INSTALL EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBS. 10. HYDROSEED ALL DISTURBED WIRE SCREEN AROUND ROCK CONSTRUCTION f AREAS NOT COVERED WITH LANDSCAPING. CONCRETE BLOCK GRAVEL FILTER 1 -1 1/2" WASHED ROCK RUN —OFF WATER W/— SEDIMENT CONC. BLOCK WIRE SCREEN DROP INLET W/ GRATE GEOFAB FILTER GRATE G NDER CB PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SE NOT )NSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: CONTRACTOR TO ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE C OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVmES, ESTABLISH GRADING LIMITS. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL FILTER FABRIC FENCE, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE & SEDIMENTATION TRAP. PROCEED WITH GRADING ACTMTIES. `� INSTALL ROCKERY. INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND DETENTION POND. PROCEED WITH FINE GRADING. PAVE PARKING AREA AS SHOWN ON PLANS. INSTALL EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBS. 1. HYDROSEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT COVERED WITH LANDSCAPING. WIRE SCREEN AROUND CONCRETE BLOCK OVERFLOW GRAVEL FILTER 1 -1 1/2" WASHED ROCK RUN -OFF WATER W/ SEDIMENT CONC. BLOCK WIRE SCREEN FILTERED WATER SEDIMENT DROP INLET W/ GRATE GEOFAB FILTER GGRATTJEC UNDER CB PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ti • 42 -- �� -- 46— a• --- 46 -- so z 1' DEPTH 2" —4" ROCK 1' DEPTH 3/4" —1 1 2" WASH GRAVEL 6p OUTFLOW CHANNEL IF CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATION. 4' MIN 0 LTU�PEf f7—MAX WS EL= 2' SETTLING DEPTH 1.5' SEDIMENT STORAGE NOTE: MAY BE CONSTRUCTED BY EXCAVATION OR BY BUILDING A BERM SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL 1' OVERFLOW DEPTH FILTER FABRIC FENCING NOT TO SCALE N �o u c S Ni NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR 2. ADDmONAL O 3. THE 50' MINI TO INSURE N TEMPOR NOT TO SCALE 4-• to • w 42 46 1 i_------- i ---- 5,'' • 1 \ ! 1 ■ ------1:'"------ I 1 . Co' 46 0 48— so x 9'13"W 14.67' uJ N) 0 0 La at'• m( EXISTING Q- 1 ASPHALT o STREET c4. 50' MIN. 25'R USE 4" TO 6" QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK FOR SURFACING AS SHOWN. MATERIAL WITH "FINES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING AND CLEANING THE APPROACH ON A REGULAR BASIS. 2. ADDMONAL QUARRY SPALLS MUST BE ADDED IF DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY. 3. 711E 50' MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE LENGTHENED IF DIRECTED BY TFIE COUNTY TO INSURE MATERIAL IS NOT TRACKED INTO THE PUBUC RIGHT—OF--WAY. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE . . • -.• • • „ . „ .• , - - • • • • " TEMP. INTERCEPTOR NOT TO SCALE TEMPORARY STORM DRAINAGE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION ISIVEHOSIESZEIESI PROPOSED ROCKERY h2 2"x4" WOOD POST ALT: SIttL FENCE POSTS FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 2"x2"x14 GA. WIRE FABRIC OR EQUIV. PROVIDE .75 - 1.5 WASHED GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE r N FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 60" WIDE ROLLS. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTATCH FABRIC TO WIRE. 2"x2"x14 GA. WIRE FABRIC OR EQUIV. 0 �AA 4. 35 00 BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL IN Er x12" TRENCH t0 �- -2"x4 WOOD POSTS. STANDARD OR Bti tH, u OR EQUAL ALTERNATE STEEL FENCE POSTS u MIRAFI FILTER FENCE NOT TO SCALE CITY OF TUKWI A JAN 4 1995 PERMIT CENTER 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH C 0 0 o v N • 0 0) 0. -4- a 0 U Q O X LL Tr) N N CO CO N t\ • (O CO Z_ z Z ¢Z¢ 0 z W W Z_ z W J U TEMP, INTERCEPTOR DITCH NOT TO SCALE s 0 P 'n 1 IVY, r s. g� r'...: Jy". w bil N t r. •i'H _.7 ,a a+ sous, Ya�A • SITE E �' .w,✓ • • rF�' Y fj %yf r ea Tac..s5`_ -�_ 7,b S VICINITY PLAN SITE STATISTICS: EXISTING ZONING PARCEL NUMBER CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS SITE AREA LANDSCAPE AREA C -M :•238420- 005 -03 L93 -0058 L94 -0018 63,864.0 SF 16),410. 2.55 SF 26.661 PARKING : EMPLOYEE STALLS `TRUCK /TRAILER STALLS 4' (162 COMPACT) south 128th street tz...4 r H STREET P.1 = 262' u=maa lersissui ple,9VP 601-4C. 511242 -0 VOLA- k•IA/"Yai\--r. c.T vt-51z. vkt_i / ry 1 / 1 -**■ 0 if \--td—d k Y,3 0 a cr.) c) co Z >0 < 1-- Z co < — cc up CC F— UJ Z co CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 4 AND LOTS 18 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 9, "RIVERTON ", A REPLAT OF PART Of RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOTS — 4,22,23, 24, AND HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDEROAD AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1004994, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, FOR PURPOSES. - Ei LIA\ 0-1A1 M UN-4K- FEHG� o✓ I- nWIRE- 1'rpIc,AL -E)(1 upcum PALI, A4 TriIGAL. PAYI 0M2- ( 11 C LI4,HEI? VLCK. 7GAI°; S;GTIO vc.fmow'• ± I:O" L13 -058 , A PI-IE ND 25 -rKr 'CAL / *00 \icovri-, 42t4 bI/K a-1NN4 LINK- FHC W/ W•g-E!*17 WIRE- _26,1 0(1-g-LIPP Rb ALE- LANIV-Z/34QE /*-Eike7 1117AVINICT \ 6p1' CX-1-34,1-1E17 x = 125' • .1" v,24)—el • NOT x-1-5.11-40te_ PAK-KINA- LOT LAM .or ot,i-rr000r- P mr-44-11-46 4'x A 2.0 4'7' 7t: .3.,e) x-rom NeiA)el / -x-ria-Lii;:gtc-1-4120 / \ / \ \ \ i ■•• / 0.45 F6 \ : --- --N.. / _, U a F 1,161-111Na --'1\ t\ --- , .---- f ■ :,- / -N--- -- / MANE1,1Y-ittel --- / \ \ , / / \ / *00 WA-ri-\t-IV-rp,i_ HALit2e•— \ ■ 1( • ' 9e2L- ircii_PNCr / \ . i / 4. w/ il4 o LA4 e cl-MI,4,,. \ dCli l>"!..,K .112iVi oilarc-rarr \ , ) Owr Pix-n-liz.. \ _1 I --- / CiN eg) fit 741-011 / ‘ / 11 , --.-s. 1 I t-Q1 l' ! 1 ! ! !_- 1 _- _ Q ! ‘ --..- -% r----1---- --- x/ _____ • - 1 / • , ., i mits..4, P.L. = 125' *ma. rommourremmormarounlainufasoll Ismener °L/\ 1-10-M X1OAH-LQT r LJHI1P -r' 0.W WKF PE-g- op- ou-rpoor A4-42 FAr-V—IN16. / 1 ; P =450.72- ParnIMONSINNININft.rwesorw •L rowramssommawameetr. .."." 19a 191 / 4.■••••■•■• :261 -4 P.L94.59' ><I9rit-16-r1 1-101-K.,5 MOILIOSIDDIMINIMINIK ›Is I.5-11N(I HouK5 EAST MARGINAL WAY Xis 'Ha cij gin' t + 2 Wp �4- IMMO JAN 4 1995 PINNY @MTV N Baas s,,,„ L. 414-) PROPOSED EMPLOYEE AND TRAILER PARKING FOR: BECKER TRUCKING S. 128TH & EAST MARGINAL WAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON I A °- 1 0 10 1 " =20' 20 40 SS EX. SS MH RIM =40.96 IE= 29.51(8 "E,W,N) (CENTER OF CHANNEL SS ss tia •v EX. CB RIM =33.95 IE =31.99 12 "W) IE =31.85 12" S IE =31.60 18"N IE =31.67 8' SE IE =32.00 (NEW 1 ') M a I 4) o S. 128th STREET ss SS SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO --� PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATCH ,,4IEW ASPHALT TO EXISTING REMOVE EXIST CHAIN BA AND METAL POSTS 4. CAP EX. 1 5" DI / PINE. i \ ■ 1 AS eHALT BERM SE DETAIL SHT. 3 OF QC)' �b bU. 5" DIA. TREE EDAR N 3 EX. CB RIM =33.95 IE =31.99 12"W IE =31.85 12"S IE =31.60 18"N IE =31.67 8 "SE. IE =32.00 (NEW h ) DWY. ° EX. CB RIM =34.36 IE= 31.31(12 "NE) PVC EX. CB RIM =35.01 IE =31.28 12"SW)PVC IE =31.23 18" S)CMP IE =28.83 12 "S)CONC. IE =28.89 12" NW)CONC. ti) EX. FIRE HYDRANT EX. SS MH RIM =35.04 IE =30.45 8 "E.W IE= 30.45(6" N,S) (CENTER OF CHANNEL) pv SIDEWALK° Oa CONTROL STRUCTURE CB #4 - TYPE 11 - 72" (SOLID LOCKING LID) RIM = 38.00 IE = 32.32 12" SE) IE = 32.32 12" NW) IE = 32.32 6" SW) a° DWY. ` „, k S. 128th STREET ss ss SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATCH h (4‘IEW ASPHALT TO EXISTING CB #5 - TYPE I W/ SOLID LOCKING LID RIM = 35.5± FLUSH W/ EX. GRADE IE = 32.18 12" NW) IE = 32.18 12" SE) IE = 32.18 6" SE) 18 LF 6" ADS-N12 0.5% '5- ss SAWCUT EXIST. ASF PROVIDE SMOOTH E EW ASPHALT TO E IAIN BA 4)• S89'59'31 "E 62.8 <F 2„- S1N INST CHA -- - -- - -- - 36-- --- CAP & ABA-N75-ON EX. PIPE LINE 64 12" ADS_A w v F ' SPHALT BERM 0..' SEE DETAIL SHT. 3 OF 3 \ 38.00 RE\ ti 110 LF 12" ADS -N12 AND EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE INSTALL NEW 75 GPM GBAk:ESGM16-- PLATE, SEE-011_31-11.__ RIM = 36.00 IE = 32.26 (12" IN & OUT 14 LF 6" ADS -N12 ®0.5% AS 'HALT BERM SE. DETAIL SHT. 3 OF 3 i I S' DIP.. EDAR 'TREE NEW EXTRUDED CONC. CURB. SEE DTL SHT 3 OF 3 ASPHALT BERM SEE DETAIL SHT. 3 OF 3 CB #1 -TYPE I. RIM = 37.40 IE = 34.90 (12" E 92 LF 12" ADS. CB #2 - TYPE I RIM = 37.86 IE = 34.35 (12" SE) IE = 34.35 (12" NW) •._ -40 -- X. FIRE HYDRANT EX. SS MH • RIM =35.04 IE= 30.45(8" E.W) IE= 30.45(6 "N,S) (CENTER OF CHANNEL) ONTROL STRUCTURE CB #4 - TYPE II -72" (SOLID LOCKING LID) RIM = 38.00 IE = 32.32 12" SE) IE = 32.32 12" NW) IE = 32.32 6" SW) h EX. WATER VALVE 4;6 EX. POWE POLE 4 EX. HANDI -CAP RAMPS :1• /ALK° #5 - TYPE I SOLID LOCKING LID = 35.5± ISH W/ EX. GRADE = 32.18 12" NW) = 32.18 12" SE) = 32.18 6" SE) LE 6" ADS -N12 0.5% 39 °59'31 "E WATER VAL EX. SS MH RIM =38.53 IE= 31.00(24 "N,S)CMP (CENTER OF CHANNEL) EX. CB RIM =38.67 IE= 36.37((8" SW)CMP IE= 30.30(18"S),CMP IE= 28.82((247;N))CMP ss 1- ss - END 6" SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE, MATCH EW ASPHALT TO EXISTING - ss VERTICAL CURB II Igi EX. SS MH RIM =40.99 IE= 32.01(8" N,S)PVC IE =32.01 8"W)DI IE =32.01 6" E)STL (CENTER OF CHANNEL) -- - - -SD- -EX. CB (2'X4' GRATE) RIM =39.66 IE =34.46 12 "W)CONC IE =35.36 8 "S)CMP IE =35.21 8"N)CMP INSTALL NEW 6' CHAINLINK FENCE D' _32.7 IE =32.70 _EX. CB RiM =39.24 IE= 37.79(8" NE)CMP INSTALL: 1 1/2" IRRIGATION -i- ER WITH BACKFLOW PROTECTOR r 92 LF 1 ADS-.N 12 OUT CB #2 - TYPE 1 RIM = 37.86 IE = 34.35 (12" SE) IE = 34.35 (12" NW) ��,�� DET S 0.5z 7 38.00 , 7 POND, SEE DETAIL R DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS 4' PINE'TR� PI IO N FO i • T 1 41 4� 16" DIA. $ TREE EX. POWER P• E C)' 6" VERTICAL CURB NOTE: 00NTRAC- OF EXIST CB C 3 -TYPE II ` = 40.00 W/ SOLID LOCKING LID IE = 33.89 (12" N) IE = 33.89 (12" NW) ... �G:..- ...��. -- --4.0 - IA • PINE T EE 1 i 1 L. EX. CB RIM =40.90 IE= 38.51(8" SW)CMP EX. CB c • 'I EX. SS MH RIM =40.99 IE =32.01 8" N,S)PVC IE =32.01 8"W)DI IE =32.01 6" E)STL (CENTER OF CHANNEL) . EX. CB (2'X4' GRATE) RIM =39.66 co : IE =34.46((12 "W)CONC IE =35.36(8"S)CMP IE =35.21((8" N))CMP EX. CB RIM =39.24 IE= 37.79(8" NE)CMP INSTALL: 1 1/2" IRRIGATION METER WITH BACKFLOW PROTECTOR B 3 — TYPE II = 40.00 W/ SOLID LOCKING LID IE = 33.89 (12'' N) IE = 33.89 (12" NW) RlM_40 IE =3g.S vs'SWjc(np... EX. CB RIM =41.61 _... IP em..111-4S(1 R" Ri1c NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER MAIN LEGAL DE15CR1P'110Nk 0 ?:"'t u c:6 cc V -J w co o z z TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 0 z 0 CC w LL z CC 1- w U w r. '1%177777.4M1. "' " .............,.......,,,,, . ' .' • , , . . • • . • " " . , . t " , ' ' , ,... - • • • • " . ',:'....,:ig,K.:Ii.';',.....,..•.1%,777.77.77,..7S+i,:2'.',.•:,-,..:',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:::;-..::■-•,:W.Piks''),.;.Z.:.Mf.ii.V.".-;.:f.,;::''V.C-:i..:. •• . . • ' ,.•: ,,•:....,. 4: • • ...... liwr MO. 4.. OWN MOW . Mad . 41001%. *NNW WO* MOWS . • - . . • . . . .• 42" "- 7.7,.--7/...... • • • ' ......--"."-- ., .. ' . . . :7"--..,---•• 42 ,.......:.........•- __ - . . tr•'•.:.,,,,..!..c.,;,,•:•:!:,:., ,,, ........................................... .. .. ............,,:*,:-..•,:!. . 5..... . '..•;',1"•:','..::::::.!--:::,-:,..:: `;;;,•;.,k■,<!,.:,,:,..:::::: •,,•••;•-!..,.7,.1--;•;,.'P-;:t1:;-,:.-;•, • - . • - . • • . . • P. . • . . • . . • 1 • , . . '• ' i . • , ' . ... . - • . . ' . ' ' " ' " " , • . • ; ; ' .. 3' DIA • NE TREE • • ", • : • • . ••••' T': NEW EXTR CURB. SO 3 Or 3 46 O'. G4h 44- 46 vq,Pcx) 40- , tiv ysl'• w b 0 45 — 50 45, 6o ,-----"-- N8 91 3" W 14 0 -/- r 4 40 .....,./.- 1 40 I 43' X 1 1 1 EXISTING END CHAIN, BUILDING LINK FENCE • STOP SIGN DIA. REE >°' IE =34.95 18 "S CMP IE =38.79 8"NE CMP / Q z i�. a9, LU - dame _ -_ DIA. - 1 ' TREE 7) \ ab cb ESSICO ADDITION SHORT PLAT No. RECORDING No. SHORT PLAT DFA NOTE: BASIS OF BEARI CL E. MARGINAL VERTICAL DATUM BENCHMARK PE SURVEY FOR WH Pp'1iER POL W/U TREE 44. t LEGEND a`° N N8' • 9' 13" W 145.67' 8" DIA. TREE FND. 1 /2" REBAR & CAP END CHAIN. LINK FENCE EXISTING BUILDING EX. MAIL BOX ti aa. EX. WATE METER EX. FIRE HYDRANT EX. TEL PHONE MANHOL 44. 35 EX. WATER VALVE EX. CB RIM =44.35 IE= 41.88(8" S )CMP EX. CB RIM =45.01 �.IE= 38.33(1811 N)CMP IE= 38.33((18"S))CMP IE =41.53 12"E CONC. EXISTING CONTOU PROPOSED CONTO EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING SPOT ELE PROPOSED SPOT E EXISTING STORM LI PROPOSED STORM ASPHALT PAVEMEN1 EXISTING SAN. SWF PROPOSED FENCE IE =34.95 18 "S CMP IE= 38.79(8 "NE CMP CB 44.35 1.88(8 "S)CMP 45.01 8.33(18"N)CMP 8.33 18 "S CMP 1.53 12"E CONC. ESSICO ADDITION TO RIVERTON LOT B OF CITY OF TUR SHORT PLAT No. 90 -4 —SS RECORDING No. 91011404003 OF SAID SHORT PLAT DFA— TRACT1. NOTE BASIS OF BEARINGS, ASSUMED N 00'03'50" E CL E. MARGINAL WAY PER KING COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP. VEF CAL DATUM: BENCHMARK PER BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, P.S., INC. SURVEY FOR WHITELY — JACOBSEN & ASSOC. 11/19/74 "LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING STORM LINE PROPOSED STORM LINE ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING SAN. SWR. PROPOSED FENCE 58 -- ---56 - -- a � • 40.19 56.2 — — — SD - - -- SS 0 0 RECEIVED JAN 4 1995 PERMIT CENTER 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH cn _w C0 U z_ j z zQ w � x }-- — z w N n z z O N co C. c cs) co zzz °O oo I I w w Q 1L-) LC) g z H CO C) w> • O O J > >C � - U cc) qtc EXPIRES 6--!!.- 9 )( 1639346.17 Y 181769.14 KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS 142.09 A188.2514.1 0\`0 142 /OS 13.11 SQ9 i•elE(WO h4µ.b21��G bo 3 cto`�,�b lG4.4l(r) ZciC� 587-44- 27C 105.9 (SUR•) 6 39.00 37.62 AC. /02.G/ 123.57 144.13 /41.44 51.93 117.72 15 • .• TS /✓99. 4.2% ,. 49.08 -42.04 - 65.0 SW I0 -23 -4 41 !t /ct.oe 81.04 a 24 0 B r0%0 efi'go 23% 02 el 93.54 CO 1 SEE SW 10. 23 -4 S 128TH NorP: PLAT vAC. a-/s-4A) sr. v, X 7 • 7607240>a4t.1( 3 90•.o0 -o0• 13 12 to 22 /48.OS 1154 -4 -S;S at 0 0 � o 21, TUKWIW LLA *009- 4 ISL.s, 144 8901190003 10 so 91011 • :I. 24?: 1:;' / 24 h KC LLA 8901028 N A W / M $22 10% 148.05 4 000 14 h 76 40 /`= p2 D 01,43° 13 90 ,42.00 n 1!.! D 30 21 P3 I • I d0 40.05 40 0 17 4 c o 116,,,, 15 0.09 4001 0010 40 \i`t"63* 6 39.00 37.62 AC. 05 30 97.05 N 4. 375.57 ST A 24.st 4,1 o N°o \o 9022 s0 2 50 Q ./ 3 O 0 iS° - 4 00 b yy •• 50 5 000 0 o b�0 � _ 50 _ ■ w N 110.05 8 014'6 Ito o 5 °10 7 011 220.31 `o 503 -III %el& r$ 202.02 °IOC O 22 /81.18 00• 0°8 0116 Of 30 30 ti M A - 0100 44 0'195 124 W J 0. 40.17 tss 0 4006°0 • 00O• �0 60.17 IN 4,0 N 00* 60 010 3 9.35 o'. )8 1.3 ✓ 110 In OS° • eiCi N ZZ z IG 14-i 1< Z 13 a, .54 84. L 7 0 O- N h to r 10 c 0 g��Zg 86.27 co 83.27 53.27 N O 10 v 0 S5 MO 'o 5 1� 1109ia 0] M 85.27 02.62 its ^0 _°I 40059 /20 4 60000 e 0099 ( SAMPS0N RP.) 225 0p0Qa 0010 40 >»-- /t0 0o4 H TUK SP, 92-0039 ��Z1 mt.) `�y0gpy /30.75 !l 104 4 9311 0 a • /G4.1 0-w K. v _I!n 000 Ito' /20 $1j00 0931 V v NW 15 -23 -4 SCALE I"= 1001 Se SW IO- 23 -4 "'Or,: At/4r VAC. a-MI-43) sr. VAC. f "Ai -46 7 / / /2so1.�s !760724q 92' .� K 1 • T • • X : . .67: ',Os(' ; • 254 r6 4 - SS o� : 9101140403 . 49 LOT B ... a: :3 ' .? : .j01. • . .i • • i. ryr • I • � v . JO. l• 3A • Al . GI, • 'IAA,. ,? • . • iT • 0• • 40G, 0005 2 30.58 94 :G/ • 1 • z4 • 1.:i ▪ .? jw�193.1 r90.O�•OOur 25G J,� /24 :.,..` N /28Th sr (RIVER sr) 001 1 a a Nh n) CA tn 0 ti g 000 01`b Nc� /Bo 60.87 30 to 50 550.47 11 734660 ti `o vot- 56; 00 tr) 60 13 h 94.30 KCSP 38C 8202 00� s.P 9'000 il0i 1 ¢o 0143 � o9 /20 50 U) NI [159.98] 014 30 100 1 e0 F4-7 B5 G0 ` 9.4.47 W 1015 103000 X30000 0111 01&1 0'!41 181180 o1 1 1030917 p140 15.57 400.91 sA oN RR) S TA 30 + 48.00 ING !STAB. RSV• 1 130TH ST 40.5 40 0. /3 5 CO 4h 4417 f^ 10 2� �06yo • a 00 9� 0 0 �GO Go o3 $0 2'A a 3 O) , =OJ. o �' n icleilcc3te. A00 Ner7 /00 /40 225 pot% TR.55 0 171.78 TUK P L- 92.0039 0 co o `cho0 ' /30.73 103.4 3 10 .19 /G AE 7 0q0� 2 1ao$o $ �I /40 1 00 M 0 90 -4 �4 NI93032408 lot2. O e F q9 O ,___. ! ao 0904 1 N 72. BG 100 v 0 'P Ci$ 200 v a to. 0 m m e. tni. Ai. 2.96 AC. /. W 15 -23 -4 SCALE I "= 1001 MAP REVISED 4- -G -93 -4 sem SW 10-23- a r• Poi. 005 ft'e D e rt. 0G$ 00 000 011. 10 49 50 /00 s0 0110 .50 G0 101506 103000 j9°°°i 0111 o1G1 33& a� p1h 80 85 GO. 07 KCSP 380 36 11-8202 003 3 i!lot 1 2Oos 1= al 0 151180 0141 75.34 Nlh . 80 1IA 61.6 rr 10309 0 o148 aa.5 ne y /,a t.1 L�•Ot o4y ,y 10 v 0� a0 itttoo 7 0o btik _� -o`t 0 5 • off$° as. 3ir f.,l►fl 0►1` 251 . ,eo°y 133.3 016 v 40 coo. 1.1, z ._._ TR.55 _ P0). • 0 0 ▪ g0 tO �o3 082'1 elk 40 opo 0e 60 106 °° 0 8743 SOu 40 O Ps q2.13 Sp M► 0524 1' 4L 40 It e► 4 • cei`14! to t 4 Z\zga y s� ` ■os °0 0 0 4 I of 1 2 3 40 40 40 50.43 40 lip 4+ 5 1,0 Olo 6 734160 3JST F�Q�ST Jview,I. A o. 1i unc wu..A ow,. /28o je;^ 4. kls 0 h 2 4000 0 b N 610'1 4 0 ao 110116 7 4 _! 4 45 5. £N. N. 2.9G AC. L X 1642384.99 Y 181726.68 4� CT, Z 381.413 . r22.32- 41 138680s.. 4 • 51%1 40 A 0 xi 4800 I ", '4 ♦ 000 ti 314 21 °oa4 4 851 7.t 3t ' 4¢,321 40 40 M ra$0. 4. �- lotl�`� (.0 I lot 2 °zaw'°0 N 13.!.75 i�. 1 74.68 3694/447 leost oo 6 3899473 It 4 r.163-0 N 3 h0 b�0 l./ ti,�• to- 001 g° 1 1 o) • se r OWN 0t 0e u ) Onti�1P 88 W • co � if 1 � 2 a to ▪ 2: I At CL. ^� o � 1__ N o -< 8 ♦� 0 Z M ,,, 85 L1 s 89 -3S K$09 A 100 509• .51W 9e 35. 196.30 279.90 _ 171.74 tr 70 70 KC SP 30 Odk Ons P 11/790571 ase 10o.oa 100 I 8003180801 L LOT I a LOT 2 I 70 i CO i L9.52 Y Iti 4 m 0 1P tto 74.26 1V. /54.04 offr 121.07 tol to 0000- 15 s /00.04 0 4. �0° kh _ /051.04 /00 198.03 187.02 /00 0 N89•3iE (174.01:) 124 88.74 70 70 1'10 00 g A3 vas) )170< /80 /eo /30 130 • 0 30 4 114,00 M °O2 114.57 ri 5 > Q x 4 u Z M 5 39.00 38.09 AC. 30 30 $1 50° 117.55 2 eo 66 /10.12 1C7 60g0 118.70 4 33996 119.27 5 9100 119.84 °1 6 4 0 6 180.42 ' 7 4005° 120.99 • 8 40 40115 121.50 ZO 9 0t °o 122.13 10 oz 122.70 t 11 0°4°1? 123.28 h 12 017 123.05 M 1 nJ e9 -S4 -'•)DNS 429•e5 /• -19.87 .70 Al` '06 Ot 90.117 5O 5 tn 15 000 14 s 00 °y�4! 13 x o 'rs\- o6 ° °cP ot 12 30 136TH 1,4613 0.1)66 X 1639676.13 Y179146.41 60 X1 40 d'a 40 73 198 S 135TH , cs 30.4E Ag143 g • 611 F 8114 30 30 Q `510 0 A0 "i rr v AN 4 0y`0 0 0.4 CO 4 000 /18 73 $T x/8.54 -30W 65 Ncs 649.18 3 08.24 r.0 iNe 0 14.87 6010 0 • In 105.36 p. 0°°3 II " 4.3 77.04 b ST h3 »1 000 r 00 /14.96 M 1 nJ e9 -S4 -'•)DNS 429•e5 /• -19.87 .70 Al` '06 Ot 90.117 5O 5 tn 15 000 14 s 00 °y�4! 13 x o 'rs\- o6 ° °cP ot 12 30 136TH 1,4613 0.1)66 X 1639676.13 Y179146.41 60 X1 40 d'a 40 73 198 S 135TH , cs 30.4E Ag143 g • 611 F 8114 30 30 Q `510 0 A0 "i rr v AN 4 0y`0 0 0.4 CO 4 000 /18 73 $T x/8.54 -30W 65 Ncs 649.18 3 08.24 r.0 iNe 0 14.87 6010 0 • In 105.36 p. 0°°3 II " 4.3 77.04 b ST h3 »1 000 r 00 114.00 h2 3 114.57 ►0 002. 115.14 I. P1131-59, to 4 Go 2 4 ,1s. 72 5 001 rn h 114.21 T 30 314.3 114.90 1 6°-00° 1/ 7.55 o 2 s00- 8.12 �O 3 scogo /18.70 695 119.27 50100 114.8401° 0 120.42 7 4°0 0 120.99 120 m •. N 1 W k0„„, m ► 0126 t4 tli 0q3° 138 577. 9 40.24 BN I,D oqt /e0 to 105 100, 7 . 100-0 6 110 400 380 124.8 IN S 133R0 120 0010 24 h 0► 00,06 23 osy22 3 ,9 10 9 ZO Olt° O ,22.13 122.70 ' 11 0530 123.28 r,0 eo 21Q 01 (.006 oo 2 '494 �0 O .. 18 60500"5 017 o°� 0000 16 01 15, „ 0 I2oay 14 0 a12 125.85 IG , ST 120 6400° 13Z) /20 30 318.04 3 311.49 ST (GLeNwoop Ave) ' 0120 I( I moo,uot, 1000 OZ • M N _ M „ ,4 1 10th 5 & & o 0 g • • `00.4 ' 7 0 003 (P0► ' 8 ` `o0oo 023° • g X X00 Oe N 115.49 24 1 115.49 " 9°° -23-- 4 °� gDp�j ►o 22 ' 21 . go0o 019 . , ow - 0085 18 , 0 017 ` . 0280 (0016. otis °I5 al 14' o 1 oi40 13; G 115.49 311.49 0 0 48-1 `,► 0 CS ,0 loo tie _,,D • e 3, 88.70 /00.71 �4 frO° ►° a0 0 �aA 117",05 "'2 # A ui o a 00 O ti !20 /20.88 # 2 X00 `Q°''0 20 $ a 1,0°°04► el oo $� 0100 z _ /00 4 /ZZ37 /07 a 3 0°° ° oc oo►y 10015 19 0250 I 0 ies.eo aj010 560 107 Ile 0 a pogo 18 , /es 1 12..35 I PG 0. 1• �0� y oohs 17' 0 04 0010 /20 IL2.84 0 6 0030 4100 16 30 30 - - /25 000° N 87- 43 - 46 W, 2642.57 SW 15 23-4 A Ac,* I. 600 i Z7G.5358.5 set MR. c,c. a.ew15 p.c. 51 .091'16•G0 311.49 0 0 48-1 `,► 0 CS ,0 loo tie _,,D • e 3, 88.70 /00.71 �4 frO° ►° a0 0 �aA 117",05 "'2 # A ui o a 00 O ti !20 /20.88 # 2 X00 `Q°''0 20 $ a 1,0°°04► el oo $� 0100 z _ /00 4 /ZZ37 /07 a 3 0°° ° oc oo►y 10015 19 0250 I 0 ies.eo aj010 560 107 Ile 0 a pogo 18 , /es 1 12..35 I PG 0. 1• �0� y oohs 17' 0 04 0010 /20 IL2.84 0 6 0030 4100 16 30 30 - - /25 000° N 87- 43 - 46 W, 2642.57 SW 15 23-4 A Ac,* I. 600 i Z7G.5358.5 set MR. c,c. a.ew15 p.c. 51 .091'16•G0 0g30 48.29 18ci' "." Oqt /24.8 400 peel /34 264:5 130 a gar 0 380 igs.. 300 130 I.e. !33RD ST /OgoQ/ W c N L( z c 17.5.2 ybsl60 Oq&O n /75.2 248.91 AD N oo 005 134TH ST. (!'ERN 5T.) 419.21 IW 419.21 a Rae'' of 0 1 n0°5 X.LN.OF:37:81,;: %t a KC SP 050 \1k6. 4 - LOT 2 ni f° 1p12 0 240 471.86 _.j !. sr./. N /90 0 N 240 5358.5 P.C. 011 1 08 5r* 49 3 * 14'60 i too t 1 'fracccc 7'87 C� L 104 5° I. 0615V %LP lost` 090 G I‘08 0°IGp y 1 h 0 A°' Uri k OqG� /sae Tit W 1 N N t 1 ,,1 ` u, fgCl .�.,o933RD ST dl A,O�pA° 00 1-- Al LN. OP 5 yt op iv yz Zit. KC SP 1083050, 8504080746 uW L0T 2 1-i ao • plc. ESMT. _,1} S. cN. N% 1.0001000 6.8o 161) W 1 "fraccci 7'817 df X 164231672 Y RECEIVED AUG 0 6 5993 CoMMtJNrr-Y OEV:LOR\TENT • KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS co LOT 3 1 >K X 40 13 So 14 16 KC SP 785018 LOT 4 f 4 tu s a .5 89- /e•-/5 E v o 1 4. a h: 3 r; 4 ': 10!15.36 TRI8 MAP 18 P01 ?fl) PUUPOSS 0? A8SI3T110 21 LOCATI1G YOUR PROPZRTY AID IS NOT GUARANTEED TO 8B01 ACCURATZ MEASURER :SITS. rura/icq oe0 /008 211.46 nA1,4Lq aQn. /003 i /5/7 i — G0 820 .4 /6 r 15 • 14 :e 13 .1 12 S 1�6CQ gif 6\ *g 11 1. • 1a 11 10 7 r. 525 6 • 15 3 376. .3 51 AC Ne5-,,-tgw 18603240930 w I ( 'n 10 � • 9 41418 +14-401 LOT 2 180 0 V V LOT I N 7-23 1' 820 %. alo }60.i0S. PCL. A TUK. SP L 576 PCL. C 051118 h 0 2 . Ri sus 24.0.4.6 6 r 0 6 to a01 4) 190 ,80 M k n /4 13 q0' h 12 �0 11 • /0 hH 3 1a�5�5 oo9 /94 ode '"` /00,5 r1 /S/ • AG 124TH v-0001, ST. 72.,vw,r. 200 11: o32 1 1 I i!0 ,— ]jo1:o LOA 44 THIS K&P IS PP08 TO PURPOSE OP ASSISTI10 11 LOCATING YOUR PROPERTY AND IS NOT GUARANTEED TO 81101 ACCURATE MIASUREYEITS. re') 1Nb i:� • i v 9s 76- ti LOT I PCL. A I TUK. 0 r NW 10 \ 5-17 3.,% 4 4, M N G&8- //- 23 W 474.02 370° 20 sot 274 • 9 °c 3 h 40 PCL. B SP L 92-0102 I.0,AP Q 1 ' 4 SA4T. 05111854 PCL. D O 1• �ir� • 29G 190 14 13 7 1 111 4e ID' 7 .PJILo c 11 /qo. 3 SI'1. -st MoN. 114.76- • P• —1 1. 7 11 . 3. Z' See NW I0 -23.4 N. 20 20 3 RIVERSIDE STC N, 1.N CYRVs C Lewis p.c.,* 7 Ma, jor #Oc4-80 2-0 2.93 6 41 0 1,101 1'lA 009 - 11C9 // ��.y0 / %u 90 KW'cR ot0 4,..A4'.- g000eZ-(44 t Agra /108 30 JN 245 5 %V) gb,A005 814 10.03 s /5•15 4 P° Doe 0 Ir 0 N ' • • 233•e., _ 1iolcc.olr,4 1 1 1 0 ,g. VA •a"'qh 00 I) %0, • o•• r .^ m n s• 1D 7401040444 •t. $ '\ 92%1.8 x ... 1110 r • A 1 sG_IC A. 482.4 S 1315.36 W 1 0 ..a SCALE: ,t" Immo = 100 1. /i%4p 110 • Dee c • RIVERSIDE STONE QUARRY ItiP I • N. LN CYAU3 C. L[W!s D.C. .'s J7 N%,jor #400480 ,‘,0\ •/-4 \ \ \ \ -o : 1-1873 ; 1,,,...i, , x.:45. . tzrD Pb ' 7o 7D \ ,4,--z : :Dm at_ \ r w N • cn 0 0 4ez.4 J'rnrwaf oleo. 1'h' w /c.t CIry GM/re ORO, /108 • • loft-a ALE: = 100 ■• • • • %V, ,•,• • ••• /1/.4p ,tintiseei by, .11-9ft • 0.. • • . • c. 14 • 0e10. -*4 /Sod -4;.1.....Z ••• 1- —O k'. 0. % co -iir `,0 in .. , th vs 0 1)• 1 • 1 / ZOO b M two 1 h 31 2 3 r: m . 30 • 4 ., • oD 29 Qx • 41 S • Po N 100 38 IE 1( 280 To II. 7 8 r Ia o w 3 2G f J 4 5 7 280 56 18 • . O,e /74.60 N SW .s se Celt ;1& 9,?3 • p,a •0 It? a o w I 0, '5 tbo to r x +t MAC. 1bY PE=VA 88111toop IAo :o K0 VA .0 IL10N 30 70 ST. 0 12 5TH KEENA 0 firtRS /00 /5 70 • .1 o� • eo V• N• ty- • • • 30 u) 70 120 • y 1 s 1O 8 g. d'' rte M 0 14 f3 dQ —I 26T ..1� so 2 1 N N 2v 100 9 C) 0 0 a:6 •� �� 6o i°�8 !i0 I •- 13 L4#h1! /p0 I LQ3 -arm$ • 0 4 40 0 11 8 ST. 3 CO 4 0141? _ n .0° an 4 j l 20 M 60 O 60 70 0 opt -7 l N 6 4N. S p �a°o 8 55 a eoo36,9,0,b0 49 4o 70 M.A. ST S86 -316 400 m 0 0 J O 30 Z0 31 • 0 9 /s 0 20 27 26 s :o �4 23 22 2/ /9 IS /7 190 0 r •.vets- 56 4/ / 23.lG 91j0" "1� J z006 2/ n 5$7 -9 PE' h h hoof, 614240 0 ;Aq• k 1 �o • m 04 22 14 13 : 12 • 11 a.5 : 10 190 f 'e'1). to . • ac 540012 by Ph4><s 5B! -4211/ 1231.6o I 2 8 T H 1 11 0 Sea 4 7o 30 V) • 4 y(o0 % _ to hi M oh 5 as VACS) 7 0 30 Zo 70 31 h 30 9 120 ' 28 27 1 G v 0 s 32 31 127.01 • /47. 30 29 26 0 2S N 8 1 I.a`PG •r �3 06 M 400 • 27 .;4 AL ,. 9 t . 7 0 7. 1 0,72 0..i /41941 `' +9490 ` w Z 0 6 s. 304•IS/S•.4: a"e Aso it 9 26 • 25 1130 200 122.05 0 %•01 24 23 22 2c P 1• J 1 90 0 14 //9 3 1 0 12 So //O 11 85 10 4 • • 19 ` , V Apo Fes. *1" 30 ,°405 to e!. as doe 11 2.1p.68 /0,44.0.9 4100 12 377.Z so 111.05 • /3 • • 1 14!•4 •i' , 11,51'51114 , < ' •. m f o /Se-ea • N v in '• N`q •S /7.s.1.4- 468 4L 1 0- 1.e 17 0 ▪ 05 1 14 el . 50 So • 6• 11 111 sL *' G0 11 0 N z0 30 30 9 Yt 4 8 cY 7 w So N.4.7• P.4I• now ..• 1 z24.e 30 NW 15- 23-4 9: leet)24 • • 23 I 1 /0 : 22 y 11 , 21 12 : : 20 f 1 /3 ' 19 I f` 14 s III 11;:12'.'" �•1t9 1g��,2 ,,,s0 /sy I Jl7 030 /s0 0385 /9O /i 1 I.a`PG •r �3 06 M 400 • 27 .;4 AL ,. 9 t . 7 0 7. 1 0,72 0..i /41941 `' +9490 ` w Z 0 6 s. 304•IS/S•.4: a"e Aso it 9 26 • 25 1130 200 122.05 0 %•01 24 23 22 2c P 1• J 1 90 0 14 //9 3 1 0 12 So //O 11 85 10 4 • • 19 ` , V Apo Fes. *1" 30 ,°405 to e!. as doe 11 2.1p.68 /0,44.0.9 4100 12 377.Z so 111.05 • /3 • • 1 14!•4 •i' , 11,51'51114 , < ' •. m f o /Se-ea • N v in '• N`q •S /7.s.1.4- 468 4L 1 0- 1.e 17 0 ▪ 05 1 14 el . 50 So • 6• 11 111 sL *' G0 11 0 N z0 30 30 9 Yt 4 8 cY 7 w So N.4.7• P.4I• now ..• 1 z24.e 30 NW 15- 23-4 v 8 7 Se 1 5 3','/ a6 0 38.56 /6 sp /AMA" sr 377.2 o ./> 54,31 49 4, N/•7"'' 44.ris=iz Mt .5) 16010 0 1,0.74 210.97 242.10 0 S• N 30 o S• 125 31'5:7 (ic /M' sr) 0 do 4 //O I Z' .4. B° v y 6 6AIP 0 s 'G X41 3/5 56. u is q -- . . — co. — 4rt, ST. $ o ..° ((- "s,/...., S -2 -n ,90 :,., 'At v ots be z r• 3 203. zdf7"�= -4�— cir J/42.$ S //0 \ • V. al 4 • 001I "‘ 13 0: t 0 4 � A :.IS #5 1 h 0) aA So 4 , 0 1— 0 30 AS dA. T d 8 •u I 5� a5 ;j 23 1 102 Jr �,gh ' 1 Or' I0 5 .4 7 N 126TH 2: .t o 20 to m 200 23o ST. 4(0 ..•.•.• "4"Z; etc. 6473 ..t 2(.6.0 116.04 4S p N y� 01 AA 23 1148 °I 24 30 00 I:i 09 I �ti M 4, 39 0 0100' 000 0 131t. 100 .' •. 14 0 5.444737r 4/ N h .S0 S0 ti e*` /9 20 2/ 25 /sown . f ..4.1 .:1t .. SO S. 128TH 130 ..:2to 7%-4••06.33 =•. ST. aJ 0 hi` 0. �p0 0 I =H Sr* 900 p. 49 BD 04, Cm) Z W •A /0 or 9,G• ejl 3/5 061 S" I-,s ,,%.w BT2.. ? 'M. �'S g0 'fN o ¶'�, I 0\� \;et #1/4 O. CV I yb.hi +i.e's' ' ^. - t O 1�I "I N 12 h,^ Rtgf•aS9 b .,MF�15 co 0 001 140 ; "8w1 O 11 d°.4t.os '�' 1 A"5r So t •7 • •4s • f ! 1�2z.� 5 igt7 4341' ,, I 04 a yoR °. 0 h 8 to • ry,�o o 4 •7 6 , o\ 4&?. mei( - r -. $T. ..� . s 0 *s o . 09 ro •%1I :4 a 50 N� • • 0 M w O • ..%.... •'Z, Ac, 0473 000 • • 61 94 ^40 o ctot' er.c. ssuso. 0/77 hewn by pi 128TH ti 1 00 111 INN it boo Gi7an , ^T 000 aq S. C. 447372 dig 46.63/7 P. 697372 Rao AUG 0 6 1993 COM:'.'iUN! DE`J =LOR,.'i~:tiT --e)e/617/.1/4./C-1 77-00S To SE (.23tY°1\i/D) Pg'012,,sgr--) 7, ez 1 &I? lot_a pa D re," /2/-p1 eA/z■ng(2 s SECTION B PA iv .4:- //./c. Goy- LA/OD Sa7PE- A / 1-a " (,;,86.77) Tieeyo S. 1281 7 • of T°T S 8•As /• NIDCO V gp.•$ ALC . _5-0°Z; 7,i rr 4. • ot-/Ast. 6111■11. =WIMP •II■1 /;■/, (8e yzPAPD) Le,,, .:$.128th. StreOt 12,4c 217Q5e/7 ,1"-(%Pt-7? SE -g Yt. C Al r---) 7-/ SECT-11 rezop_95er-2 1-71zofo.'.; el? " 60f2v4-7 , J ',--.■■;,•••:,,/' • • ; 7"-g-e> &13- //V. (•-(01,A2) Piczo .7•*r JA,te ----rpore,56- 0 fat: 6w2exiA/0 G/5//26)0G- pgrep-oni '9 13kien12 e)/4.5 1 rz-A/-1P, I- ; .1i'l e5,-,-,:fr in A Fei / A/A (.... ‘A/ r. I 7:9 SECTION A ; '-- 7" /4) ..y5 co ,v • /0 1../ L? 77n1E c7t. /L-A/V7//s-/, - —? -Airffs/t./, (-(0,vc) 2,e7.-y 6 ,p. 6WzovAio 9pr. PflAJ i 4-'477- MA F7 / Al.A L kv r. .7- r, f.3 iDLW7416.& TiON A _ 947 REVISIONS 113Y,;Z: ■10'• ij• , . pt ■', i ..-', .4, 11, 4 . 1 LYNN HORN ASSOUATIN f disuse-Am APXHITECTURE SUE PLANNING LYNN WILLIAM HORN, ASIA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OFra 10828 GRAVELLY LAxE DR IO: SW SUITE Ka TA0)44A,WAstomo-rott 2C6•51Q- MA8, Post OvEta. Box 08087 TACOALS.WASIttstarocr98498.0r.67 . . . • ••-• • . • • • • . • • • • • -• •• • 1-,•A•/117 C 72CH / C.,r/ • „ • , • OTE: P.C. MODIFICATION TO SITE PLAN *LIGHTING ON SITE *CURB STOPS *IRRIGATION PLAN *6' CHAINA.INKED Lct, ()068 GATES AT DRIVEWAY 17" . /:240:-) r74 r)67 g ”atta,t4 • • , • / tx f; 7"/ 77f:zog- NoM 1e9.EDYPENN1ONAL , P40, 61.03 A CT • -24X36 • PI/ N ;:'•••••■ 41,1 *.N.• • •• • r-C/L1 / 7-e C-7/ oris • . E>•".";,7".1-1.16., ALA-77 v To MA/P-./. • t://E;7i I-467 7f W45,-. SECTION B 4,14, '.7." SECTION B iJoRrf 1•11■11. M.MI■ Landscape Planting Plan V,•'•.:•J 2: '2;',• • ••••-,.., 'Ns s7)=-4! p i\r "7-VP, s:-! At_ ::",,,.-..;;Is. SECTION B " ` 4-•"•"‘"''' e • ..., 777.; At=1. SECTION ,B PX14)r ,-/-1 A'/ Pe ±8" 4-07' /5 ,f7S idscape Planting Plan //A: pGA A z fiksic:: • • • 1 • , • • • ••••••••••••••.-..."--.."«, 6•••.-G /A /'-..J " • . • 41 -rt: • )1.1 •,- :. GA /V r-> Tec:: A • 0 (2;7.? AT STATE OF WASHINCT N_ CT LYNN WILLIAM HORN CERTIFICATE NO. 419 DRAWN i41'/ CHECKED DATE SCALE - .04, • /...0 JOB NO. OF SHEET L-1. 2 SHEETS . • • 2 2. • • . • • , • .. � V �.,� '� NW1,�aY'n� .1 1 (7l. '.� 1' �' i} ,�,Z)r.l Nor iF4'� .•,s :A yi S1 S2 S3 S4 - M -28920 - M -28930 -M -28960 - M -27610 Kril Kril Kril Finish Finish Finish 6050 6092 6094 AP -1 B /MA16 56 ihs eft ;*91 Qd, exc.�- m NTED CONCRETE TILT -UP PANELS TED WINDOWS IN ALUMINUM FRAMES SIGNAGE INDIVIDUAL cry PAINTED CONCRETE TILT- UP PANELS TINTED WINDOWS IN ALUMINUM FRAMES TEXTURED CONCRETE w Q PAINTED CONCRETE T1 LT--UP PANELS ELEVATION PAINTED CONCRETE TILT-UP PAN W L z cn 0 z W 1- z W 1- W cc z 0 W cc z 1- X W 1- n m `. A A NEW FACILITY ...ru N.1 li• ri • E.B. BRAD OAT {WAY MONTH 1 1111TM /TUT 1MW *, WASHINGTON P 1 201J111.1)17 12111NHAUBSN AV SFAITEE,MASNNIOTON 1 1 1 1 1 ., an IA ...ru N.1 li• ri da ,81y x Ku10 ilY N• aw ipn.s..NI nil,. 4' ~" Mw1p.,•a- ,e,,,r 'mil °/ i) w .cn g Ca 5 I FFig 51. 4;1 HIROS AWA-0110■010 ASPS Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. Land Planning, Survey 8 Engineering Specialisli ism .6•• A., Z.. • 6012 A NEW FACILITY FOR: THE E.B. BRADLEY COMPANY GATEWAY NORTH 110TH STREET TUKWILA. WASHINGTON B.CE JOB NO. 4788 0S6 411 '195. .:611fi119UILIA4AV5 SEATII f 1145.4104 9 1 6 1 P. • Ivo av 1.1:ni 8 211 10• 5 NAY 21 gm .1' 9