HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L93-0077 - BOEING - SHEETPILE AT SHORE / SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTl93-0077 7755 east marginal way south boeing company
FORM 81 (REV. 7/86)
P.1,14Tief: SA '79'
1-hj r::: -TTakon o L-413/43000
Affidavit of Publication , t c r 19 ':c•
NgC r 'DMA }t4
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
COUNTY OF KING,
TOM EGAN being duly sworn, says that he /she is the Principal Clerk of
Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES and representing the SEATTLE POST -
INTELLIGENCER, separate daily newspapers, printed and published in Seattle, King County, State of
Washington; that they are newspapers of general circulation in said County and State; that they have
been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed,
being a ® classified advertisement ❑ display advertisement, was published in:
ET The Seattle Times ❑ Seattle Post - Intelligencer ❑ and
not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the regular and entire
issue of said paper or papers on the following day or days December 10, 17 , 1993
and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said
period.
CITY OFTUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOS-
AL: BOEING•SHEETPILE ATI
SHORE TO CONTAIN SOILS
PROPONENT: THE BOEING.
COMPANY
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: •
ADDRESS: 7755 EAST
MARGINAL WY S
PARCEL NO: 000160.0020
SECT W N/R N G: 33/24/04
LEAD AGENCY: ••
CITY OFTUKWILA
FILE N O: L93 -0077 .
December
The City has determined that the Of 09 93
proposal does not have a prob-
able significant adverse Impact
on the environment. An environ-
mental Impact statement (EIS).
Is not required under RCW
43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision
was made otter review of a com-
pleted environmental checklist
and other Information on file
with the lend agency. This Id {for-
mallon Is available 10 the public
on request.
This DNS Is issued under 197.11-
340(2). Comments must be sub-
mitted by December 17, 1993.
The lead agency will not act on
this proposal for 15 days from
the date below.
L. Rick Beeler,
Responsible Official
City of Tukwila, (206) 431 -3680
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
You may appeal this determine-
Lion to the City Clerk at Clty
Hall 6200 Southcenter Boule-
vard, Tukwila, WA98188 no later
than 10 days from the above sig-
nature dote by written appeal
stating the basis of the appeal for
specific factual oblectlons. You
may be required to bear some of
the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for
SEPA appeals are available
with the Clty Clerk and Depart-
m vetopment. Community
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
Twenty -S
fie& E
day
Notary Pu n and fa he Stage oj, WAshington
residing at 1 7 /CifC/i' -
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Control No.
Epic File No.
Fee $325.00 Receipt No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Interim Corective Action Project 2 -66 building
2. Name of applicant:
The Boeing Company
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Sid Browne, P. 0. Box 3999, M/S 19 -38, Seattle WA 98124 -2207
4. Date checklist prepared:
September 29, 1993
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Work at the 2 -66 project site is projected to begin February 15, 1993. Completion is projected for May 20,
1994.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
This is an interim corrective activity approved and directed by EPA RCRA. Any additional actions will be defined
and permitted separately after these corrective actions are complete and monitored for a period of time.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal.
Soil and ground water investigations have been completed for this project. Monitoring of soil and ground water
conditions will be conducted otter sheetpile installation. Reports of Corrective Action will be completed under the
RCRA Consent Order.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. Agreement on RCRA consent order is forthcoming.
10. List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Local permits from the City of Tukwila for storm droin correction and grade and fill activity.
V&41s
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. There are several questions later in this check list that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The Scope of Work on this project includes the installation of a sheetpile containment system in area directly
adjacent to the 2 -66 building and bounded by the Duwamish River to the west of the building and project. The
intent of the system is to restrict the migration of ezistin ground water containing solvents. This interim action
is in compliance with the pending EPA consent order. "'''
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location
of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if
known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
sites(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this check list.
Boeing, Plant 2, 7755 E. Marginal Way So., Seattle, WA 98108. Area adjacent to the 2 -66 building. (See
attached site plan and legal descripition.)
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan
Map as environmentally sensitive?
No.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (underline on)Flat rolling, hilly,
steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent
slope)?
None.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,
clay, sand, gravel, peat, much)? If you know the classification of
agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Below the site paving the ground consists of about 4 ft. of fill which
overlays silty sand, the alluvial material of the Duwamish River.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No. The area has been almost completely paved for 40 years.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any
filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Fill is proposed to replace any material removed during excavation of
impacting storm drain lines. A secition will be removed then reinstalled
after sheetpile is driven. Quantities: approximately 200 cubic yords for
project. Source to be determined, but material will be secured from
licensed local sand and gravel supplier.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
No.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious
surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or
buildings)?
Presently the site is covered 100% with asphalt and buildings. After
placement of sheetpile, asphalt that has been removed will be replaced
bringing the percentage back to 100 %.
d/ word /form/env- chk/2- 66bIdg/10/11 /93 -4-
.. .,......,.,,. «......... .
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts
to the earth, if any:
None
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal
(i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during
construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
During construction, there will be some noise and dust from equipment in
project area. Minimal volatile organics may be emitted from soils during
construction.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect
your proposal? If so, generally describe.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other
impacts to air, if any:
Construction activity will be confined to daylight hours between.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate
vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal
streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. if appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
This project is within 200 ft of the Duwomish Waterway.
Approximately 35 ft. at its nearest point. This Waterway, in turn, flows
into Elliot Bay and Puget Sound.
d/ word /form/env- chk/2- 66bIdg/10/01 /93
-5-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to
(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please
describe and attach available plans.
Yes. This project will be done completely within the 200 f , wetland—
area. See attached site plan and drawing. A shoreline per ' �s
being applied for on this project.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and
indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate
the source of fill material.
(Ref.) Page 4 item E.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions?
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so,
note location on the site plan.
No. Only existing Plant 2 outfalls lie within the 100 —year flood plain.
The 100 —year flood plain is within the banks at river mile 5.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials
to surface waters?
No.
d/ word /form/env- chk/2- 66bIdg/10/01193
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged
to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities, if known.
Ground water may be taken from excavation area where rm drat
correction is necessary. This water, because it is in the area where
solvents may be present, will be placed in temporary holding areas
and then disposed of off —site.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the
ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for
example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number
of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
This project will create no additional waste materials. Those materials
excavated will be removed from the site.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1)
Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and
method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,
if know). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Currently, runoff from area is collected in catch basins that connect
to storm drain lines and dischargd through existing outfalls to the
river. Except for temporary disconnection of intersecting storm drains
(to be reconnected when sheetpile is driven — approximately two
hours) no change or interruption to system will occur.
d/word/form/env -chk/2- 66bIdg/1 0/01/93
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
ftir l Labe c
ogaityik. �>
hf ,1d
�: •
Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe.
This project will not further impact area with waste material. See also
page 7, 31.
. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and
runoff water impacts, if any:
r
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
__ other types of vegetation - Blackberry bushes along bank
no vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
None.
dlword/form/env- chk/2- 66bIdg11 0/01193
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
None.
5. Animals
a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Waterfowl
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, hening, shellfish, other.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near
the site.
None.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Near the site in the Duwamish coho, summer - fall chinook, and chum
solmon
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
d/word/form /env- chk/2- 66bfdg /10/01 /93
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)
will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs?
Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by
adjacent properties?
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the
plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or
control energy impacts, if any:
None.
7. Environmental Health
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to
toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous
waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
Yes. This project is a corrective action under authority of EPA.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
Personnel working on this project will be protected per OSHA guidelines. All
wastes generated will be managed per WDOE guidelines.
d/ word /fonr/env- chk/2- 66bidg/10/11 /93 -10-
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your
project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None.
What types and levels of noise would be created by or
associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term
basis (for example: traffic, construction. operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Construction noise will be of the same type that exists as industrial
noise in area. No long term noise would be created. Construction
noise will occur during normal working hours.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if
any:
Mufflers will be used on all trucks and equipment used on the project.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Manufacturing, airport, office and parking.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Yes. Prior to construction of the Boeing plant in 1930's.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The project area has manufacturing buildings and hangars along the entire
west side of East Marginal Way. Further to the west, the site is bounded by
the Duwamish waterway.
dlword/formle nv-c hW2- 66btdg/10 /01 /93
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Heavy manufacturing. /4 -- Z
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Heavy Manufacturing.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program
designation of the site?
Urban.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally
sensitive" area.
No.
i. Approximately how
completed project?
None.
j•
Approximately how
displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures
any:
None.
many people would reside or work in the
many people would the completed project
to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with
existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
Project is remedial in nature and will not impact any existing or protected
land uses.
d/ word /formlenv- chk/2- 66bldg /10 /01 /93
-12-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing?
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not
including antennas; what is the principal exterior building
material(s) proposed?
Structure will not extend above ground level.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or
obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None.
d/ word /form/env- chk/2- 66bIdg/10 /01/93 -13-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time
of day would it mainly occur?
No light or glare will be produced.
b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of Tight or glare may affect your
proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Tight and glare impacts, if
any:
None.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Boeing employees recreation facility is located in vicinity. An employees
exercise facility is located on —site in 2 -22 building. Trail and sitting areas
exist at north end of Plant 2.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational
uses?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,
including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or
applicant, if any:
None required.
dtword /formlenv- chk/2- 66bldg/10/01 /93 -14-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,
state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the
site?
None.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or
next to the site.
None known of.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site
plans, if any.
See attached site drawing.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If now, what is the
approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?
How many would the project eliminate?
None. None eliminated
d/ vord/form/env- chk/2- 66btdg/10 /01 /93 -15-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or
improvements to existing roads or streets, not including drive
ways?
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,
rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
Project will not impact or use water, rail or air transportation.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would
occur.
None.
g. Proposed measure to reduce or control transportation impacts, if
any:
None.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services
(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,
schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No additional public serivce.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any.
None.
dfword /form/env- chk/2- 66bldg/10/01 /93 —16—
16. Utilities
a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity,
natural pas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer,
septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on
the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
None.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its
decision.
Signature:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Date Submitted: Ad /� /9g .
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
d/ word /form/env- chk/2- 66bIdg/10 /01/93 -17-
:
•�.......�......._._
City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director
January 13, 1994
Mr. Ky Su
Shoreline Permit Coordinator
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47690
Olympia, WA 98504 -7690
Subject: DOE Permit No.15279
Dear Mr. Su:
Per your request, I have enclosed the following:
1. City of Tukwila SEPA DNS;
2. Letter from the Boeing Company dated 24 August 1993
3. Letter from EPA stamp -dated 11 May 1993;
4. Boeing document titled: Technical Specifications Interim
Corrective Action;
5. Vicinity Map (location highlighted).
Please note that there were no mitigating conditions for this
proposal. You had also requested a copy of the Affidavit of
Publication. This document will be forthcoming. Also, please note
that L93 -0076 refers to the Shoreline Permit issued for this
project.
Please contact me at 431 -3663 if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Denni Shefrin
Associate Planner
cc: L93 -0077 File
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665.
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
BOEING SHEETPILE AT SHORE 70 CONTAIN SOILS
PROP0NEN-1: THE BOEING COMPANY
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF:ANY;
ADDRFCS: 7755 EAST MARGINAL WY
PARCEL NO: .000160-0020
SEC/TWN/RNG: 33/24/04
LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: L93-0077
The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable
siqnifcant adverse impact on the environment. An
environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2Ykc'is.
This decislon was made after ceview of a completed environmental
checklist.and other information on file with the lead agency. Th.ts .
information is available to the publio on request.
4 '4' 4 4 k 4 '4 * k: 4-4 1 k k 4 '4 .4. ic 4 ,;( '4 -k 4 4 4 A 4 4 -.4 -1 4 4-4 '4 4 -4 4 A- 4 4 k 4 4 -4 -4 -4 -k 4 -4 4 * 4 1 -A. k 4 4 k 4 4 *
TV!
this pro
197-11-340(2). comments must be submitted tcy
. The lead agency will not act on
for 15 days from the date be
sick Bee.ler, Responsible Official
City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3630
6300 Sc.uthoenter Boulevard
Tul;:wila, WA 93182.
• Date •
Ybu may appeal this, determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200
Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98133 no later than 10 days from the
above signature dare by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for
specific factual objections. You may be required to' bear some of the
e..-spenses an appeal.
Ccpies of the procedures for SERA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
213,
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
P.O. BOX 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -7600 • (206) 459 -6000
December 15, 1993
Mr. L. Rick Beeler
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila WA 98188
Dear Mr. Beeler:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of
nonsignificance for Interim Corrective Action Project 2 -66
Building proposed by the Boeing Company. We reviewed the
environmental checklist and have the following concerns.
1. This is a contaminated site remediation, therefore, Labor
and Industries Health and Safety Standards Chapter 296 -62
WAC, Part P apply. Please describe proposed air monitoring
for volatile organic compounds (page 5, item B.2.a). These
standards also apply to item B.7.a. We agree with the City
of Tukwila that Boeing's response does not answer this
question. Very little information is provided concerning
compliance with other state laws in this proposal.
2. We have discussed this site with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10, RCRA Section. It is our
understanding that this remedial action is not exempt from
State and local laws as a RCRA corrective action. This
means that Labor and Industries Health and Safety
Regulations, MTCA regulations and state waste regulations
apply at this site.
3. The statement is made on page 10, item B.10.7.a.2 that "All
wastes generated will be managed per WDOE guidelines." This
should be changed to read "All wastes generated will be
managed according to state regulations Chapter 173 -303 WAC
and Chapter 173 -304 WAC. In addition, all other applicable
state regulations concerning health and safety of hazardous
waste workers and MTCA requirements for independent cleanups
shall be implemented."
4. The environmental checklist does not contain enough
information for the Department of Ecology to perform an
adequate review and comment for this proposal. A workplan
should be submitted as an appendix to the checklist, which
states specifically the details of the actions proposed.
4 t8
0
Mr. L. Rick Beeler
December 15, 1993
Page 2
5. This proposal should be adequate to cover, in sufficient
detail, the missing parts of the checklist, such as page 10,
item B.7.a.1. The Labor and Industry requirements specify
that a site specific health and safety plan be developed,
and the locations of emergency services be identified.
6. Page 3, item A.13, we cannot understand how work undertaken
in a "wetland area" 200 feet from the Duwamish shoreline
(see page 5, item B.3.a.2) is not considered an
environmentally sensitive area. Although it may not be
locally defined as such, a check should be made to the state
shoreline regulations to see if it fits such a definition.
7. Page 7, item B.3.b.1 and 2, more detail is needed on how the
water and soil will be analyzed prior to disposal decisions.
8. Page 7 item B.3.c, provision will be made to source separate
clean storm water runoff from coming into contact with
contaminated areas during excavation activities. Any storm
water runoff leaving contaminated areas shall be collected
in the holding tanks and analyzed prior to disposal
decisions.
9. The work plan shall contain the details of how contaminated
soils are to be protectively stockpiled while awaiting
analysis results and disposal decisions. Details shall also
include the frequency and types of analyses to be performed,
both on the soils stockpiles slated for off -site disposal,
and the soils remaining in the excavation for cleanup
verification.
10. A final cleanup report shall be provided to the Department
of Ecology's Toxic Cleanup Program, Northwest Regional
Office within 90 days of the completion of the cleanup
action, in accordance with WAC 173 - 340- 300(4)(a).
11. If fill material will be placed in state waters, including
wetlands, the applicant shall contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers in Seattle at (206) 764 -3495 regarding additional
permit information.
..�
Mr. L. Rick Beeler
December 15, 1993
Page 2
If you have any questions on Comments 1 -10, please call Ms. Gail
Colburn with the Toxic Cleanup Program at (206) 649 -7058. For
questions on Comment 11, please call Mr. Tom Luster with the
Permit Coordination Unit at (206) 407 -6918.
Sincerely,
M. Vernice Santee
Environmental Review Section
MVS:
93 -8694
cc: Gail Colburn, NWRO
Janet Thompson, NWRO
Tom Luster, CP
c,..w�..,,..., w..,. r., r...+..,......,......•,..»..,.,....,. vrrn.: vs::.: �n� >yxn- �rmuear,4arniarvw,.ma�wr ors a v-» vea. 4*..., nw...w..-.. w. , « «,.....w,.,..«r..:�rvn�'xa... .��._ .r
To: Denni Shefrin, Planning Division
From: John A. Pierog, PW Development Engineer
Date: November 22, 1993
Subject: Boeing Containment Facility
7755 East Marginal Way South
(West of Building No. 2 -66)
Activity Nos. L93 -0076 & 0077
Shoreline Development & SEPA Reviews
RECEIVED
NOV 2 3 1993
DEVELOPMENT
The subject reviews were conducted at our November 9th plan review
meeting. There were no comments received. Necessary Public Works
permit requirements will be addressed at the time of permit appli-
cation.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know.
JAP /jap
cf: Development File
-
c
7
•
,. •
' • '•! • '
..:14%,...'.
! I
cc,C.41.ft
A 6, 0 66 A •
."'
%cRE-r
■ ,qt
•
•
;
, •-•
•• .
•-• :7
5 '1
• •
,••• A ... ..
' \ %.
• ,
.. •
t, • .
Lq3-0077
' A '
///
—,:' ' 1 ';'. , • 2.` N . ,, ' '
\"-!: ,,'
% ..• • 1 t 1 %
.• , • — • /
•
t• "
/1717771.-2' '77
1, t.NOERCROUN3 0T0.5C5 SHCAtoR tiEREJI% itAvE BEEN PLOTTED
tgokt A CER95AT.Ctt OF 'TOD LOCA't.• q.CURES
RECORD DATA SuRFACE FEATURES \C- LSCATE.9 ARE SO
NO1E0 RCv r NESTOS. 05 •%C, COES
NC, ASSURE LiAtivEY FOR CORRECIVAS CF :AU C5
'WOES t•DIJ.Ct. Ov CBSTRuCTIO%S.
ATTERPTED TO CCVF•Itv L0CA.10,
SASItAttv ASO STCRY rItt
L0CA:05 ft..S Net ABLE TC tVt•
1505 1,1000 IAES. LOCAT NG ,NO. 5551
OF 070E5 L%0ER05O.P.0 unt.0•ES
'• 7_ 7-'1
_ _ _ t:t 5. • j.
, • — 3
ot A 6.
I
rot utt.
• _ •
0 AC •
2 !
CC%•7,EfC
2— 1 08
•-•2,,
PA
.)
%I) RAPPING EIV RERMIVENG•NEERNG, INC JOB No. 3129 ICSOMSACK1.1.0S II
••.i.I. •pt I". I'` BUILDING 2-66
, .....,,
EXISTING SITE PLAN
INTERIM CORRECTIVE ACTION i.2.„10;
BUILDING 2-10 AND 2-66
AlPf 'If !
• I SHEET PILE CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS I 7- ltttI, -YD-C25,1
. ....,
rsi
0.
•
-
•
s.<\ •
‘■‘• STORM DRAJN
SHEET PILE WALL
',:•cOsc*ETE
• 7'.
- • NOTE 7)
. .
A s • • a .•
ASPo..,T
r
CAUTION HIGH VOLTAGE
0V6-CAD ELECTRIC ONES -
CONTACT ELECTRIC UTIU111 PRIOR
TO wCRK NEAR THESE LINES.
• ‘.\
4') FENCE TO SHEE±,
PILE c, DISTANCE
• • ‘
•,.
DISMANTLE AND REMOVE WOOD
CANOPY AND CONCRETE BLOCK
612
V13-0017
,„_ 211 F'^o•^N:
917
REROuTIND VP.)
"
3.
• 1.
3-
• '
DETA3 X — 1
36364
------- --
-------
:e2011 7)
7/
.v-(01
•
soria%
t"..ESSJ, 4:36 3.'1',
pe 39 30 5•011., ?1,5 LS "6'
OS ".6 t,e6.4,31.7.
2. Si! 0.42' 3324 3.. "'e 63304' ,
433,1. :‘,‘'XXf 3,
•-.3,64313, 3,1,3 3 00 , P1PAR13, "A •
••' e•C■66, 3.IC• 0. :4,, 3Cv,.• 3::
4
AY' 3,1
3,, £6„
CC,....3.‹3.71% 44 LA, 3•(.64. 43 -6.3. .:11434
:WI. 06 .0:4 .37 Jr •-.1.
6 4,,
..e .33 3.33,".. •0
Pf, 34467 6•.
3.6.3
'.33,? P.3 000...3.1' 6 ."3`., :
3.46 333 3, 63.15 .
744 'X,. 0 5461"
.3,3 5,6..6. ,L6., • • 4.6 .1
v._ • ' •
:6,33.66,3
3".
..... . I , CENTERUNE OF SHEET 5119 I
2-66
. 1 , (SEE NOTE 303020 111
:-...r.)■ . - 7S.16 RLAL
1 301AL AND REPALALBNIT (522 34312 6)(D
(-\■ i'
\I
44.. EI.,1 -
52.-0"
I,- r,
____ _ 2.:-..Qz.,, co 0,3, 00'... ::... ,
6 6 ri 6 6 1
.41<':'• co" .....,...0
-. -- - -_ 1 , .
. . " ".
INTERNA. CAVTY SEA. 64- 1' 4
JOINT SHEET PILE
S*ILET PILL 23612.
1 .4'
‘1117 605
2 ..
• • _ •
SHEET PILE CONTROL POINT
(START LOCATION)
PLUG AREA DRANS THE SURFACE 63,13
STORM DRAIN IS OUT or SEMACE (TYP.)
AS.NA61
VEltrallrAWC(IR X. E`' 3 ON 3 413
...
,--:• .
..^.
. : z /,(rs ,r• '
0.?1-s:.., F..,:,,,,.
: 7 ' •
'.28030 CRETE ,
4 ".. I
/
.• (Iv
/.
•
1/.
•
2- 1 08
•
v2.5(WQ...2(
3000,14P3 ,..,, ..-7....03_..06!.•3 '. '' BUILDING 2-66
........11.1`..:: ....:,:1.1.'"..., :,..,: ' P.'__.,P.1q...N,D2EMOLITION AND SHEET PILE INSTALLATION PLAN '-
INTERIM CORRC—CTIVE AC110N 5 1C
.
BUILDING 2-10 AND 2-66
. 11,111-21..
SHEET PLE CONTAffshialT SYSTEMS
C3,02'00® WEGac2120H1 ZYG217Ealx.1 ccROU
PLANT 2
SEATTLE / TUKWILA, WA
108.1 ACRES
0
i I I I
SCALE
1,000 FT
I
NORTH DUWAMISH CAMPUS
DUWAMISH
WATERWAY
PARKING
7 -320
2-041
2-14
2-05 GATE
B -60
2 -09
2.18
BOEING
FLIGHT TEST &
OPERATIONS
(SEE PAGE 21 )
GATE B -34
2 -24
BOEING COMPANY
HEADQUARTERS
GATE B -32
LOBBY
MARINA
2-48
2.45
MEDICAL
FACILITY
2-47
GATE 0-18
L_
o -'577
GATE B -14
15 -02 7 -63
;275
2-72
`.::./
2-71
2 -77 E. 78
2-82
s
126'1\
- — ( '
15 -35
15-07
15.06
CT/FOS
SOUTH PARK
/SITE . /:= _/
15 -100 / -; SEE BCAG SITES, PAGE 43
15-10
•
SEA-KING
INDUSTRIAL
PARK
36
• ' 15.19
• 15.09
15.21
15-25
15-22
7 -09
BCAG
7 -10
BD &SG
0 v.
. ? , - , s�
2-95
2-106
2-97
2 -96
2-91
FAA TOWER
♦ 2-117
2-126
2 -102
2-103
2-89
THOMPSON
SITE
♦♦ JORGENSEN
FORGE CO:
♦
2-104
2-110
2.109
C 3 1993
t'
BOEING
FIELD
LEGEND:
II PEDESTRIAN
TUNNEL
2-24 Building
7755 E Marginal Way S
Seattle. WA 98108
01 -01 -93