HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L06-015 - WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - HIGHWAY 99 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTWSDOT
CROSS OVER PROTEC TION
SR 99 & SR 18 MEDIAN
L06 -015
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
File Number: L06 -015
Applied: 02/14/2006
Approved: 04/04/2006
Expiration: 04/04/2011
A permit is hereby granted to: WSDOT
to: Construct the SR99 Median Crossover Protection Guardrail
Upon the following property:
Address:
Parcel Number:
Section /Township /Range: SR 99 Median between MP 23.24 and 25.92
The following master program provisions are applicable to this development:
KC Shoreline Master Program
Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions.
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the
applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this
project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW).
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project
as approved and any conditions thereof.
CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090,
OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE
TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c).
Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
may only be appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within
21 -days from the filing of this permit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For more detail information on appeals,
refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08.
\ L i t 2.t',
Da e:
Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two (2) years from the effective date of the
permit (the date the permit is filed with D.O.E.), per RCW 90.58.143(4).
rl,.r• Chnrelc,71 I nG rli
Steve Lancaster, Director of Department of Community Development
24N.
FILE NAME
TIME
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjC
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY M. HASAN
PROJ. ENCR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
SECTION 2
SR 99
MP 23.24 - MP 25.92
0 1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
SR 99 MP 23.24
T. 23N. R. 4E.
S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
9:06:21 AM
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
N o.
STATE
FEO.AIO PROJ.NO.
NH
10 WASH
J 00 NINBEN
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
LOCATION NO.
( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE
() OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
() DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV.
() DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE P
KING COUNTY AGENCIES
() BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11
() FIRE DISTRICT #2
( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION
() KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC
() KC. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY
() RENTON LIBRARY
( ) KENT LIBRARY
() CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
() QWEST
() SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
() PUGET SOUND ENERGY
() HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT
() SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES
() KENT PLANNING DEPT
( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
() PUBLIC WORKS
() POLICE
( ) PLANNING
() PARKS & REC.
() CITY CLERK
( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
( MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM
((FISHERIES PROGRAM
( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM
() SEATTLE TIMES
( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
P: WDMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC
WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES
( ) FIRE
( ) FINANCE
() BUILDING
()MAYOR
FEDERAL AGENCIES
OTHER
() U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D.
() NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
() DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. 4
DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV —, ,a
( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* T>J
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
• SEND CHKLIST W () DETERMINATIONS
SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION
SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES
UTILITIES
CITY AGENCIES
MEDIA
() FOSTER LIBRARY
() K C PUBLIC LIBRARY
()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
() SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
() RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) HEALTH DEPT
() PORT OF SEATTLE
( ) KC. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR
( ) KC. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL
() KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES
() OLYMPIC PIPELINE
( ) VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( ) WATER DISTRICT #20
( ) WATER DISTRICT #125
() CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT
() RENTON PLANNING DEPT
() CITY OF SEA—TAC
() CITY OF BURIEN
( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
() CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCL U
( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE'
• NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ.
LOCAL AGENCIES
QQDUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
() P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY
() SOUND TRANSIT
() DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION
'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER
( ) HIGHLINE TIMES
( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VWWV
1tu�k : ►. to G44 „)e_t1
J, z0 33031
Sew 44 -L.LAA &I33 -S7
Notice of Public Hearing
Dept. Of Community Development
City of Tukwila
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
I, 0 (/L oue, � v ck HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
Determination of
Non-Si
nificance
oreline Mgmt Permit
Notice of Public Meeting
Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt
Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt
Planning Commission Agenda Pkt
Short Subdivision Agenda
FAX To Seattle Times
Classifieds
Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds
PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111
Mitigated Determination' of Non-
Significance
Determination of Significance
Notice
Scoping
Notice of Action
Notice of Application
Notice of Applicati
Permit
for Shoreline Mgmt
Other
Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this5
year 20 Ow
the
Project Name: \A) jba --
Project Number: L,cc.a - 0(6
Mailer's Signature: 3..h
Person requesting mailing: N p'L_
P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM
Project:
File Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Associated Permits:
Comprehensive Plan/
Zoning Designation:
Staff:
I. Project Description
•
City of f Tuk1NZla
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Nora Gierloff
April 3, 2006
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
SR99 Median Guardrail
L06 -015 - Shoreline Management Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Benjamin Brown for Washington State Department of
Transportation
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to install a cable
guardrail within the SR99 median between MP 23.24 and 25.92.
Construction will involve placing steel posts in the highway median
and stringing cables between the posts with shock absorbing anchors
at each end.
None
Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy (MIC /H)
The project is to install a median guardrail along SR99. The purpose is to increase traffic
safety as there is currently only a shallow ditch between the north and southbound road
segments. The guardrail will help to prevent errant vehicles from crossing into oncoming
traffic. The project is subject to the shoreline substantial development permit since the
project area is located within 200 feet of the Duwamish Waterway.
Construction will involve placing steel posts in the highway median and stringing cables
between the posts with shock absorbing anchors at each end. This will require minor
excavation, grading and reseeding. One wetland has been identified within the project
limits. It has minimal functional values and is exempt from regulation under Tukwila's
Environmentally Sensitive Areas code, TMC 18.45.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665
III. Shoreline Regulations
• •
II. Policies of the Shoreline Management Act /Shoreline Master Program
The site is located in an area that was annexed by Tukwila from King County in 1989. As
no new shoreline master program has been adopted for this area, the project is subject to
King County Shoreline Master Program and regulations. Tukwila is the agency
responsible for administering King County shoreline regulations as they pertain to this
site.
Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the King County Shoreline
Regulations as applied by the City of Tukwila:
King County Code (KCC) Section 25.16.030 General Requirements:
A. Non -water related development shall not be permitted waterward of the Ordinary
High Water Mark (OHWM).
Response: The proposed project is not water ward of the ordinary high water mark.
B. ...No structure shall exceed a height of a thirty -five feet ...
Response: The guardrail will be between 3 and 5 feet from average grade.
C. All development shall be required to provide adequate surface water
retention and sedimentation facilities during the construction period.
Response: The proposed project will meet all King County Surface Water Design
Manual requirements for retention and sedimentation facilities during the
construction period.
D. Development shall maintain the first fifty feet of property abutting a natural
environment as required open space.
Response: This criterion is not applicable, as the King County shoreline environment
designation adjacent to this site is "Urban Environment ".
E (1) Parking areas must be located beneath or upland of the development...
E (2) Any outdoor parking area perimeter...must be maintained as a planting area with
a minimum of five feet.
E (3) One live tree...shall be required for each thirty linear feet of planting area.
E (4) One live shrub...for each 60 inches of planting area shall be required.
E (5) Additional perimeter and interior landscaping of parking areas may be required
when large parking areas are proposed.
Response: No parking is proposed as part of this project.
F. Collection facilities to control and separate contaminants shall be required
2
• •
where storm -water runoff from impervious surfaces would degrade or add to the
pollution of receipt waters or adjacent properties.
Response: The proposed project will meet all King County Surface Water Design
Manual requirements.
IV. Comprehensive Plan Shoreline Policies
The site is located within the Manufacturing /Industrial Center along the
Green /Duwamish River. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan establishes the following
priorities in this shoreline environment:
• Redevelopment of under - utilized areas and development of intensive commercial and
industrial activities;
• Enhancement and restoration of access to the river; and
• Protection and restoration of natural environment features and riverbank
characteristics, where compatible with development.
The proposed project is a minor traffic safety improvement that will not affect these
goals.
V. SEPA and other approvals
WSDOT has determined that the project is categorically exempt from SEPA review
under WAS 197 -11 -800 (2) (c).
V. Recommendations
Approval of the application without conditions.
3
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Northwest Regional Office 0 3190 160th Avenue SE 0 Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000
April 12, 2006
Benjamin Brown
15700 Dayton Avenue North
P.O. Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133 -9710
Dear Mr. Brown:
Re: City of Tukwila Shoreline Substantial Development Permit #L06 -015
Washington Dept. of Transportation — Owner /Applicant
Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2006 -NW -50031
Purpose of this letter
RE^FIV7
`APR 14 2006'
C OMMUNITY
D EVELOPMF-NT
This letter is to inform you that on April 5, 2006, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City
of Tukwila approved your application to construct a cable guardrail within the SR 99 median to improve
traffic safety. This section of SR 99 is within the Urban Shoreline environment of the Green River.
The law requires you to wait at least twenty -one (21) days from the date Ecology received this decision
from the City of Tukwila before you begin the specific activities authorized by this permit. This waiting
period is to allow anyone disagreeing with any aspect of your permit to appeal to the Washington State
Shorelines Hearings Board. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an
appeal, and if they do you must wait until the appeal is over before you start work.
To be sure that the Shorelines Hearings Board has not received an appeal, we advise you to call them at
(360) 459 -6327 before you begin work. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition
to this shoreline permit. Please contact me at 425- 649 -4260 or slan461 @ecy.wa.gov if you have any
questions about this letter.
Sincerely,
Sandra Lange
Shoreline Planner
SL:cja
cc: Nora Gierloff, City of Tukwila t/
0
PROJECT INFORMATION
Washington State Department of Transportation has filed an application for a shoreline
substantial development permit to construct a guardrail located in the median of State
Route 99, a portion of which is within the shoreline zone of the Green River.
Permit applied for: L06 -015 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Studies required with the applications include: Wetland Delineation
The project has been determined to be categorically exempt from SEPA environmental
review per WAC 197 -11 -800 (2) (c).
FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
The project file is available at the City of Tukwila. To view the file, you may request it at
the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300
Southcenter Boulevard #100.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at
the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., April 3, 2006
APPEALS
You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal
rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. Tukwila's decision on the Shoreline
Substantial Development Permit is appealable to the State Shoreline Hearings Board.
For further information on this proposal, contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431 -3670 or visit our
offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.
Application Filed: 2/14/06
Notice of Completeness Issued: 2 /24/06
Notice of Application Issued: 3/2/06
24N.
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99
TIME 9:06:21 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
SECTION 2
SR 99
MP 23.24 - MP 25.92
0 1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
SR 99 MP 23.24
T. 23N. R. 4E.
Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18
REVISION
& SR 99.dgn
DATE
•
END CONSTRUCTION
SR 99 MP 25.92
BY
REGION
N O.
10
STATE
WASH
J OB WISER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH-0018(033)
� OCATI re NO.
State of Washington
County of King
City of Tukwila
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98186
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665
E - mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING
OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S)
RECEIVED
MAR 0 8 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
I INT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal
Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of
Completeness.
I certify that on g 2- 042 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.1 10 and the
other applicable guide' nes were posted on the property located atr
to be clearly seen from each right-of-way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number
I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and imme
property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (
ly dispose of the sign at the
a No ' . lette
Applicant or Project Manager's Signature
On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the
individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My commission expires on
Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this'(
year 20 b(,Q
Dept. Of Community Development
City of Tukwila
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
' - ck HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt
Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt
Planning Commi ssion Agenda Pkt
Determination of Non - Significance
Mitigated Determination of Non -
Significance
Determination of Significance & Scopin
Notice
Notice of Action
Short Subdivision Agenda
Shoreline Mgmt Permit
FAX To Seattle Times
Classifieds
Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds
PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111
x
Notice of Application
Notice of Application for Shoreline Mc.
Permit
Other
P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM
Project Name: tA) S � O
Project Number: Lo Le_ -0( 5
Mailer's Signature: 9„ f)
Person requesting mailing:
FEDERAL AGENCIES
( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE
() OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
(TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
() OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
TRADE
() DEPT OF FISHERIES ECONOMIC C DEV.
WILDLIFE
KING COUNTY AGENCIES
() BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
() FIRE DISTRICT #11
( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2
( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION
() K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC
() K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE
( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY
() RENTON LIBRARY
() KENT LIBRARY
() CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
() OWEST
( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
() PUGET SOUND ENERGY
() HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT
() SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
( ) AT&T CABLE SERVICES
() KENT PLANNING DEPT
( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
() PUBLIC WORKS
()POLICE
( ) PLANNING
() PARKS & REC.
( ) CITY CLERK
() PUGET SOUND SW K CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
M COUNCIL
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM
(FISHERIES PROGRAM
( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM
( ) SEATTLE TIMES
() SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC
WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES
() DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.
DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV
)) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION'
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
SEND CHKLIS DETERMINATIONS
SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION
() FIRE
( ) FINANCE
( ) BUILDING
()MAYOR
SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES
UTILITIES
CITY AGENCIES
OTHER
LOCAL AGENCIES
OUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
() P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY
() SOUND TRANSIT
() DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION
'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER
MEDIA
() U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
() U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D.
() NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
( ) HEALTH DEPT
() PORT OF SEATTLE
( ) KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR
( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL
( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES
() FOSTER LIBRARY
() K C PUBLIC LIBRARY
( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
() RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE
( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( ) WATER DISTRICT #20
( ) WATER DISTRICT #125
() CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
() BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERANATER DISTRICT
() RENTON PLANNING DEPT
() CITY OF SEA-TAC
() CITY OF BURIEN
( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU
() STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE'
• NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PING PROJ.
( ) HIGHLINE TIMES
() CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW
T deLUU
t,.1 S��T
o, Dy.. 330317
5t_.tt -iA 6) 8'33 -1-710
Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision:
Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE)
Department of Ecology Shorelands Section
State Attorney General
*Applicant
•Indian Tribes ,
*Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list).
Any parties of record
• send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination
SEPA MAILINGS
Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing)
Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section
• Applicant
*Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list)
•Any parties of record
• send onlythe staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination
KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand
Send These Documents to DOE:
SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper)
SHORELINE MAILINGS:
Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500
feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of
Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit
written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so
within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the
information that writter . comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing.
Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General:
Permit Data Sheet
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra)
Findings (staff report or memo)
Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
- Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements
Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline
- Grading Plan
— Vicinity . map
SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra)
Findings (staff report or memo)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline
Notice of Application
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed)
P :1ADM INISTRATIVEIFORMS\CHICLIST.DOC
PIVIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PIVAITS
US POSTAL SERVICE
Attn: 547618 -107
8055 E TUFTS AVE #400
DENVER CO 80237
NEVSCO LLC
PO BOX 40211
BELLEVUE WA 98015
THE BOEING COMPANY
100 N RIVERSIDE M/C 5003 -4027
CHICAGO IL 60606
KING COUNTY
500 KC ADMIN BLDG
500 4 AVENUE
SEATTLE WA 98104
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
ATTN; ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
PO BOX 34023
SEATTLE WA 98124
PORT OF SEATTLE
UTILITIES DEPT
PO BOX 68727
SEATTLE WA 98158
PORT OF SEATTLE
MARINE DIVISION
PO BOX 1209
SEATTLE WA 98111
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
39015 - 172 AVE SE
AUBURN WA 98092
Project:
6 i2- q q ./(/(,),-c::-..7, 6, ,,,,,,,--,„i
i
Address:
Date
transmitted:
//
2/c9 40 (to
Response
requested by:
3/
/c(
Staff
coordinator:
/,
idv� i 61 ' es-{.1-) CC
Date response
received:
TO:
Li Building
Plan check date:
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM
lanning
•
REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED
development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you
want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and
plan change needed.
The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own
regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important
to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further
Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This
further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process.
Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST
identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method
used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation
required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be
required of the applicant.
COMMENTS
(Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.)
( �„ ; 44 , n colvimeort -S .
� orR P p �(moms. Lc
Comments
prepared by:
•
RECEIVED
FEB 2 4 2006
TUKWIIA
PUBLIC WORKS
Update date:
File Number
L. a -01.5
ublic Works Fire Dept. — Police Dept. =- Parks /Rec
Project:
6C /kt
/
Address:
Date
transmitted:
0 /0 lP
Response
requested by:
3/8(:
Staff
coordinator:
( /,
`'uvr 1 &I , s{.
r-
Date response
received:
TO: : Building
Plan check date:
— 0C
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM
lanning
•
Comments
prepared by:
ublic Works L. Fire Dept.
COMMENTS
(Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.)
File Number
Police Dept. ' Parks /Rec
REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED
development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you
want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and
plan change needed.
The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own
regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important
to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further
Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This
further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process.
Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST
identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method
used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation
required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be
required of the applicant.
vo-P, tly Mgr5 ) o ' -ac-c p ,. - } - (, ctih. roc cioSui ke
Update date:
Wi Washington State
Department of Transportation
January 11, 2005
TO: Bob Caldwell (MS -138)
FROM: Charles Plummer (ext. 4607)
THRU: Gary Davis (MS -138) .
SUBJECT: SR 18 & SR 99 Median Crossover Protection (XL 2711)
Wetland Delineation
WSDOT will install a cable guardrail within the State Route (SR) 99 median between
milepost (MP) 23.24 and MP 25.92. The project area is located within Sections 4 and 9
of Township 23N, Range R 4E, in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington (Figure
1). Project activities comprise placing steel posts in the highway median and stringing
cables between the posts with shock absorbed anchors at each end. This may require
some minor excavation, grading, and reseeding. This memorandum documents one
wetland within the project limits and the methodology used to delineate and classify the
wetland.
METHODOLOGY
Memorandum
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
DEVELOPMENT
Wetland resources in the area were assessed using the Washington State Wetland
Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997) and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) methods and
guidelines. In places with apparent wetland characteristics, the dominant plant species,
test pit soils, and hydrology were recorded on routine data forms. Upland areas adjacent
to each potential wetland area were also evaluated. Based on the field data, a
wetland/non- wetland determination was made for each area examined. When all three
wetland parameters in a given area were confirmed, wetland boundaries were marked
with sequentially numbered, pink fluorescent pin flags along the wetland perimeter.
The wetland delineated within the study area was classified according to federal, state,
and local systems: USFWS, Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE or
Ecology), and the City of Tukwila. The USFWS system (Cowardin et al. 1979) is a
descriptive classification, based on physical attributes (i.e., vegetation, soils, and water
regime). The (DOE) system (Hruby 2004) divides wetlands into four hierarchical
categories based on physical attributes including type and class rarity, disturbance
sensitivity, functions, and re- creation ability. The Ecology system evaluates wetland
hydrology and geomorphic position and assigns the wetland a hydrogeomorphic class.
This allows for a more accurate rating of how well the wetland functions based on its
landscape position, water source, and the flow and fluctuation of water through
the wetland. Ecology's wetland classification hierarchy ranges from Category I wetlands,
which exhibit outstanding features (i.e., rare wetland type, relatively undisturbed or a
DOT Form 700 -008 EF
Revised 5/99
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 2
high sensitivity to disturbance, high level of functions) to Category IV wetlands, which
have the lowest levels of function and are often highly disturbed and fragmented. The
City of Tukwila uses a three category simple, arbitrary system based on the pre 2004
King County rating methodology (City of Tukwila, 2005) based on size, vegetation, and
Cowardin classes.
1D 7apoQaadt CapyAght ®1999 fklm® Yarmouth, ME 606
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
666 ft Sc k: l: 24l!! Dehft f2.7 Dates WGSY1
The project area wetland was evaluated using the WSDOT Wetland Functions
Characterization Tool for Linear Projects manual (WSDOT 2000). The manual is a
qualitative tool designed for linear projects to enable the rapid documentation and
characterization of the functions provided by a given wetland. The methodology does not
assign quantitative values to a particular function, but identifies functional strengths and
weaknesses to help guide management decisions and aid in mitigation choices. Wetland
functions are divided into 14 categories.
i
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 3
• Flood flow alteration
• Sediment removal
• Nutrient and toxicant removal
• Erosion control and shoreline
stabilization
• Production of organic matter and its
export
• General habitat suitability
• Habitat for aquatic invertebrates
EXISTING CONDITIONS
• Habitat for amphibians
• Habitat for wetland- associated
mammals
• Habitat for wetland - associated birds
• General fish habitat
• Native plant richness
• Educational or scientific value
• Uniqueness and heritage
The project area is located in urban King County within the City of Tukwila along the
Duwamish River. Residential, commercial, and industrial developments dominate local
land uses.
A small unclassified (King County, 1990) stream (StreamNet 230820, [WSDOT 2005])
is located about 500 feet north of the project but is not hydrologically connected to it in
any fashion. The National Wetland Inventory shows a complex of riverine, palustrine
forested, scrub - shrub, and emergent (PEM) wetlands in the project vicinity associated
with the Duwamish River and its tributaries (Figure 2).
Geology and Soils
Glaciers carved the Duwamish -Green River Valley. Soils were mostly alluvial, resulting
from lahars and periodic flooding (USDA 1952). At that time (1952) the Puget and
Woodinville series dominated local soil mapping. However, large -scale earth moving
and fill have also extensively modified the area, therefore more recent surveys have
mapped the area as Urban Land (USDA 1973).
Vegetation
The project is located in the Puget Trough portion of the Western Hemlock (Tsuga
heterophylla) zone (Franklin and Dyrness 1973). Mown grass dominates vegetation
within the highway median. Vegetation in the project vicinity, along the highway
shoulders, includes small willows (Salix sp.), red alders (Alnus rubra) and big -leaf maple
(Acer macrophyllum) patches with an under story of snowberry (Svmphoricarpos albus),
dewberry (Rubus ursinus), and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis). Willow patches grow
intermittently along the riverbanks. Developed areas have lawns and ornamental
plantings.
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 4
Figure 2. NWI Map
0 750 1,500 3,000
4,500
6,000
Feet
Wetland
Location
Legend
Wetland (NWI) - Subsystems
Freshwater Subsystems
Riverine, rower perennial
Rtverine, upper perennial
®a.." Riverine, intermittent
•.`-- Lacustrine, limnetic
L.acustrine, littoral
Palustrine
- Base Stream
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 5
WETLAND CONDITIONS
Wetland delineations were conducted on September 29, 2005. During fieldwork, the sky
was sunny with broken clouds at times and occasional light showers. Temperatures were
around 60 Fahrenheit. These conditions are within seasonal norms.
WSDOT biologists delineated one wetland in the project area. The field data sheets,
functional assessment, and Ecology rating forms are provided for the wetland.
Wetland 1
PEM
Ecology Category IV
Tukwila Category 3 (50 ft Buffer)
Wetland 1 is located in a closed depression in the highway median (Figure 2). The
wetland is at the same elevation as the wetlands that dominate the landscape on either
side of SR 99 outside the roadway prism. A hillside seep is located along the southwest
side of the roadway, and a riparian wetland borders the Duwamish River northeast of the
roadway. The wetland covers less than 650 square feet (0.015) acre.
Figure 2. Wetland 1.
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 6
Soils
Wetland soil indicators include a low chroma and prominent redoximorphic features.
Soils were very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty-sands with strong brown (7.5YR 5/8)
redoximorphic features. Current soil maps (USDA 1973) map urban soils in the project
vicinity. The examined soil profile resembles the hydric Puget and Woodinville soils
mapped in the area in the obsolete USDA survey (1952). However, the series are still
current according to the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Official Soil
Descriptions (MRCS 2000 and 2002). Observations were made under overcast conditions.
Hydrology
Sheet flow, underground seepage from higher elevations, and seepage from river high
flows create wetland hydrology. The soils were moist throughout the soil profile during
late September observations. Because the Pacific Northwest has a pronounced summer
drought, moist soil conditions, near the droughts' end, indicate wetland soil saturation
during a substantial portion of the growing season when a wetland plant association and
hydric soils occur. Probable soil saturation during the growing season fulfills the wetland
hydrology criterion.
Vegetation
Wetland plants or hydrophytes (Reed 1988, 1993) dominate the wetland's vegetation,
fulfilling the wetland vegetation criterion. Plant species include soft rush (Juncus
effusus) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea).
Wetland Determination
The assumption of soil saturation, low chroma soils, and a hydrophyte- dominated plant
association, fulfilled the three wetland criteria. The wetland boundaries were flagged
where elevation decreased and wetland vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology
indicators occurred. Upland areas had higher elevations, and dry highway fill soils.
Wetland Classification
Wetland 1 is a palustrine emergent wetland under the USFWS classification system
(Cowardin et al. 1979), and a depressional closed system. The wetland met Category IV
wetland criteria under Ecology's 4 -tier rating system Hruby 2004) and Category 3 criteria
under the City of Tukwila Environmentally Sensitive Area Ordinance (City of Tukwila
2005). Tukwila Category 3 wetlands require a 50 -foot buffer (City of Tukwila 2005).
Wetland Buffer
Wetland buffers were mown grass in the highway median, highway prism fill, and
concrete and asphalt highway lanes.
Wetland Functions
This small wetland has minimal functional values. However, it does provide a small
amount of flood flow alteration, and toxicant, nutrient, and sediment removal because the
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 7
feature is a closed depression in a developed environment that captures and holds
contaminated surface flows.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To minimize impacts to wetlands, vegetation, streams, and fish and wildlife habitats, the
following measures are recommended:
1. Use standard erosion control techniques during construction.
2. Changes to the proposed design require a re- evaluation of wetlands and sensitive
areas. If the design changes contact WSDOT biologists and Landscape
Architects.
encls: References
Routine Wetland Data Forms
Wetland Functions and Values Form
Ecology Rating Form
Plan Sheet
To_Bob Caldwell
January 1 1 , 2006
Page 8
REFERENCES
City of Tukwila. 2005. Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ordinance: 18.45, Wetland
Buffers: 18.45.08. City of Tukwila, WA.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Government Printing
Office, Washington, D.C.
Ecology. 1997. Washington state wetland identification and delineation manual.
Publication #96 -94. Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y -87 -1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, MS. 100 pp. plus appendices.
Franklin, J. F., and C. T. Dyrness. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington.
USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW- GTR -8.
Hruby, Tom. 2004. Washington state wetlands rating system for western Washington -
revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 04 -06 -025.
King County. 1990. Sensitive Areas Map Folin_-K.ing County. Seattle WA.
NRCS. 2000 and 2002. Official Soil Descriptions for Puget and Woodinville Soil
Series. NRCS at http : / /ortho.ftw.nres.usda.gov /cgi- bin /osd/osdname.cgi
Reed, P.B. Jr. 1993. Northwest supplement (Region 9) species with a change in
indicator status or added to the Northwest 1988 list, wetland plants of the state of
Washington 1988. U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. 88
(26.9), Washington, D.C.
Reed, P.B. Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Washington.
Biological Report 88(26.9) for National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C.
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. National Wetland Inventory in Washington State.
http://wwwi.wsdot.wa.gov/gis/GeoDataCatalog/maps/24K/NWI/
NWI_Readme.txt for metadata provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
the Originator of this data set. USFWS:
http: // wetlandsfws .er.usgs.gov /wtlnds /launch.html
USDA 1952. Soil Survey of King County Washington. Series 1938, No. 31. USDA,
Agricultural Research Administration, Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and
Agricultural Administration. Washington, D.C.
USDA. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. USDA. SCS.
Washington. D.C.
USDA, NRCS. 1997. Hydric soils of the United States. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service in cooperation with the
National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. World Wide Web Site
( ), last updated March 7, 2000.
To_Bob Caldwell
January 11, 2006
Page 9
WSDOT. 2000. Washington State Department of Transportation. Wetland functions
characterization tool for linear projects. WSDOT Environmental Affairs Office,
Olympia, WA.
WSDOT. 2005. WSDOT: \gisosc \geodata\ maps\ 100k \dfw \streamnet \byhuc\hucindex
Field Investigator C. Plummer Date 9/29/2005
Project SR 18/9 Project Title Median Crossover Protection State County
Applicant/Owner WSDOT Plant Community Name Pit 1 upland
Wetland Location
East and West of wetland in highway shoulder
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? yes >1
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? yes >)
Wetland Size
NA
(Acres)
no
no
Wetland Type
NA
N 1987 Manual
I 1989 Manual
Sheet #
Department of Ecology
Wetlands Rating System
Category Points
NA NA
Dominant Tree Species
(
(
(3)
(4)
(5)
Dominant Sapling/Shrub Species
(1)
(
(3)
(4)
(5)
Percent of dominant species that
provide 20% or more of the groundcover
and are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC status
VEGETATION
Percent Indicator
Cover Status Dominant Herb Species
0
Basis
(I )
(
(3)
(4)
(5)
Other Nondominant Plant Species
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
No vegetation
Percent Indicator
Cover Status
Mapped Urban USDA 1973. Woodinville in Puget 1952. SOILS
Soil Series
yes no yes no
Is the soil on the Is the soil a histosol?
hydric soils list? I
Is the soil mottled? I N Is the soil gleyed?
Other hydric soil indicators
Soil is compacted crushed rock fill material, without vegetation. Barren
ondition likely maintained with herbicide. No soil hydric indicators are
oresent.
Soil
Depth
Basis
o hydric indicators Nate: It is infeasable to dig soil pits in the compacted, filled highway prism.
Munsell
Color
Munsell Color
Mots Mots
Depth to soil saturation
Depth to free - standing
water in pit/soil probe hole
Surface Water Depth
NA
NA
NA
HYDROLOGY
List other field evidence of
surface inundation or soil saturation
No signs present
Basis
Soil dry with no indications of wetland hydrology.
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met?
Is the hydric soil criterion met?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met?
Is this plant community a wetland?
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
yes no
N
(
I I N
Rationale for jurisdictional decision
No criteria met.
Field Investigator C. Plummer
Project SR 18/99
Applicant/Owner WSDOT
Wetland Location Wetland Size
SR 99 Median between M.P. 24.51 and M.P.
24.53
Dominant Tree Species
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Percent of dominant species that
provide 20% or more of the groundcover
and are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC status
not currently mapped * (Woodinville ?)
Soil Series
Is the soil on the
hydric soils list?
Is the soil mottled?
Basis
yes
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Project Title Medina Crossover Protection State WA County __ King
Percent
Cover
100
no
❑ Is the soil a histosol?
❑ Is the soil gleyed?
Plant Community Name Pit 1 Wetland
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? yes
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? yes ❑
>0.015
(Acres)
VEGETATION
Indicator
Status
Basis All FACW
SOILS
yes no
❑ E
u
E
Other hydric soil indicators
1952 Obsolete USDA soil survery shows Puget and Woodinville series in
the area Current 1973 shows urban soils NRCS lists Woodinville and
Puget series as current soil series. Sand and silt soil texture.
no
no E
Wetland Type
Palustrine Emergent
Dominant Herb Species
(1) Juncus effusus
Soil
Depth
Date 9/29/2005
Munsell
Color
8+ hard (shovel refusal)
I Department of Ecology I
Wetlands Rating System
Category Points ,
IV
Percent
Cover
45
(2) Phalaris arundinacea
(3)
(4)
(5)
Mots
40
Sheet #
Dominant Sapling/Shrub Species Other Nondominant Plant Species
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
(3) (3)
(4) (4)
(5) (5)
Low chroma & mottles. NOTE: Soil is in highway median and very disturbed. As a result it is compacted at about 8 inches.
® 1987 Manual
❑ 1989 Manua
19
Indicator
Status
FACW
FACW
Munsell Color
Mots
10YR 3/1 0 -8" 25 7.5YR 5/8
Depth to soil saturation
Depth to free - standing
water in pit/soil probe hole
Surface Water Depth
HYDROLOGY
List other field evidence of
surface inundation or soil saturation
Basis
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met?
Is the hydric soil criterion met?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met?
Is this plant community a wetland?
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
yes no
� u
E
Rationale for jurisdictional decision
Hydrophytic plant association and low chroma redoximorphic or "mottled "* Meet
these criteria. Moist soil in late dry season indicaes saturation during growing
season. Also, hydrology criterion can be presumed from soil and plant indicators.
RECEWED
FEB 14 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Most soil near surface in late September
Puget Sound has a pronounced summer drought. Moist
conditions at the end of the drought shows probable
saturated conditions during ason
indicates saturation during substantial part of
NA
growing season. Sources: sheet flow into
depression, high water table from nearby river,
NA
Field Investigator C. Plummer
Project SR 18/99
Applicant/Owner WSDOT
Wetland Location Wetland Size
SR 99 Median between M.P. 24.51 and M.P.
24.53
Dominant Tree Species
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Percent of dominant species that
provide 20% or more of the groundcover
and are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC status
not currently mapped * (Woodinville ?)
Soil Series
Is the soil on the
hydric soils list?
Is the soil mottled?
Basis
yes
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Project Title Medina Crossover Protection State WA County __ King
Percent
Cover
100
no
❑ Is the soil a histosol?
❑ Is the soil gleyed?
Plant Community Name Pit 1 Wetland
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? yes
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? yes ❑
>0.015
(Acres)
VEGETATION
Indicator
Status
Basis All FACW
SOILS
yes no
❑ E
u
E
Other hydric soil indicators
1952 Obsolete USDA soil survery shows Puget and Woodinville series in
the area Current 1973 shows urban soils NRCS lists Woodinville and
Puget series as current soil series. Sand and silt soil texture.
no
no E
Wetland Type
Palustrine Emergent
Dominant Herb Species
(1) Juncus effusus
Soil
Depth
Date 9/29/2005
Munsell
Color
8+ hard (shovel refusal)
I Department of Ecology I
Wetlands Rating System
Category Points ,
IV
Percent
Cover
45
(2) Phalaris arundinacea
(3)
(4)
(5)
Mots
40
Sheet #
Dominant Sapling/Shrub Species Other Nondominant Plant Species
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
(3) (3)
(4) (4)
(5) (5)
Low chroma & mottles. NOTE: Soil is in highway median and very disturbed. As a result it is compacted at about 8 inches.
® 1987 Manual
❑ 1989 Manua
19
Indicator
Status
FACW
FACW
Munsell Color
Mots
10YR 3/1 0 -8" 25 7.5YR 5/8
Depth to soil saturation
Depth to free - standing
water in pit/soil probe hole
Surface Water Depth
HYDROLOGY
List other field evidence of
surface inundation or soil saturation
Basis
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met?
Is the hydric soil criterion met?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met?
Is this plant community a wetland?
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
yes no
� u
E
Rationale for jurisdictional decision
Hydrophytic plant association and low chroma redoximorphic or "mottled "* Meet
these criteria. Moist soil in late dry season indicaes saturation during growing
season. Also, hydrology criterion can be presumed from soil and plant indicators.
RECEWED
FEB 14 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
1 ld t CT - r+ iCf
W- •
tf?/ : 7;, 1 **l 4 h rl1.1'
;
Estuarine
Depressional
>4
Natural Heritage Wetland
Riverine
Bog
Lake- fringe
Mature Forest
Slope
Old Growth Forest
Flats
Coastal Lagoon
Freshwater Tidal
Interdunal
None of the above
Ftecol'
Name of wetland (if known):
WETLAND RATING FORM - WESTERN WASHINGTON
Location: SEC: TWNSHP: _ RNGE: ^ (attach map with outline of wetland to rating form)
Person(s) Rating Wetland: C 7 41P- Affiliation: t&v ' pr, rDate of site visit: 9/2, /6 -
Category I = Score > =70
Category H = Score 51 -69
Category III = Score 30 -50
Category IV = Score < 30
SUMMARY OF RATING
Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland
I II III IV
Score for Water Quality Functions
Score for Hydrologic Functions
Score for Habitat Functions
TOTAL score for functions
Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
I H Does not Apply
Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above)
/'
5
ri v
Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated.
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
August 2004
• )� - 1 • J f + 4. r a ���i i r ! J t Iu: H t 4 r PP :rNd 1 " elf i r .3 � •
p
h ecl� ` ,is ox R'etula dS,t at end ><al r arAt�ee n r
. � �( tisc
� t : � :Y
r 4'.
� i ,
; 4 %, �,
t. i t '' .' • . r. .:
.�e 6 •` ) T Y r r r r. . i $ . r * t.. 4i '∎, 6 ., + �,r i
I
: d��;. i1!;;,:! , :,,• er :f1� 11(l ;i n ; h li e ,o .R ,t'A.. �.�lr�i :1 f r . ,.. ' �
SP 1. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed
Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species (T /E species)?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state or federal database.
1"
SP2. Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or
Endangered plant or animal species?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state database.
SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW
for the state?
SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For
example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program,
the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having
special significance.
Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below?
If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland
according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland.
To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the
Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated.
The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This
simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic
Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions
on classifying wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
2 August 2004
•
D Depressional and Flats Wetlands
WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to improve
water quality
Points
D
D
D
D
D
D
D 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p. 38)
D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland:
Wetland is a depression with no surface water outlet points = 3
Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points = 2
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points = 1
Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch points = 1
2
D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic
(h sulfide or rotten eggs).
YES points = 4
NO points = 0
a
D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class):
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 95% of area points = 5
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation > = 1/2 of area points = 3
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 1 /10 of area points = 1
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <1 /10 of area points = 0
D1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation.
This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out
sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded.
Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs.
Area seasonally ponded is > '/2 total area of wetland points = 4
Area seasonally ponded is > '/4 total area of wetland points = 2
Area seasonally ponded is <'/4 total area of wetland points = 0
NOTE: See text for indicators of seasonal and permanent inundation..
Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above
S".
D
D
D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 44)
multiplier
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface
water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in
streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the
following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.
— Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft
— Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
— Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland
— A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,
residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear -cut logging
— Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland
— Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2
/v
Add score to table on p. I
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
5
August 2004
•
•
ressionaland.Tlats Wetlands
''{ f y. � l - 'j i�.fti I..�d't^ 4 ° _'�a.c�•�� } > rbs
Fe'_.h� .'ih .. r 4. ✓as ..^JA - � r .z.;,: �a.... •!,. .�. t.,. lc..irr r•... �?4G.S ,i�'(.' ?.;r,': �f•rf.ui4.1• i2:�,ti
HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to reduce
flooding and stream degradation
D
D
D
D
D
D
A 3. Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion?
(seep. 46)
D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland
Wetland has no surface water outlet points = 4
Wetland has an intermittently flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points = 2
Wetland is flat and has no obvious outlet and /or outlet is a small ditch points = 1
Wetland has an unconstricted surface outlet points = 0
D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods
Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet
Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface
The wetland is a "headwater" wetland"
Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface
Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface
Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap
Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft
points = 7
points = 5
points = 5
points = 3
water points = 1
points = 0
D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed
Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the
wetland to the area of the wetland itself.
The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of wetland
The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the wetland
The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the wetland
Wetland is in the FLATS class (basin = the wetland, by definition)
points = 5
points = 3
points = 0
points = 5
Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above
D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
(seep. 49)
Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood
storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream
property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows.
Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such
as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than
90% of the water in the wetland is from groundwater.
Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply.
— Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems
— Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems
— Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might
otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems
— Other
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1
TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4
Add score to table on p. 1
0
multiplier
1
d
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
6
August 2004 "
7?h�se quest apply to ruetla itls,o fall 116111 classes
•
HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to provide important habitat
H 1. Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species?
I
1.1 'Vegetation structure (see p. 72)
Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) if the class
covers more than 10% of the area of the wetland or 1/4 acre.
Aquatic bed
/Emergent plants
Scrub /shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover)
Forested (areas where tees have >30% cover)
Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub - canopy, shrubs, herbaceous,
moss /ground- cover)
Add the number of vegetation types that quali f}'. If you have:
4 types or more points = 4
3 types points = 2
2 types points =
1 type points = 0
H 1.2. Hvdroperiods (seep. 73)
Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The
water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or 1/4 acre to count. (see text
for descriptions of hydroperiods)
permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points = 3
4/ 5�asonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points = 2
gecasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point = 1
turated only •
Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland
Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland
Lake fringe wetland = 2 points
Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points.
H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (see 75)
Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft (different
patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold)
You do not have to name the species.
Do not include Eurasian Miljbil, reed cana.rygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian
Thistle
If you counted: > 19 species • points = 2
List species below if you want to: 5 - 19 species • points = I
< 5 species points = 0
`P i ntS'
0
0
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
13
August 2004
H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (seep. 76)
Decided from the diagrams
vegetation (described in
include open water or
below whether interspersion between types of
H 1.1), or vegetation types and unvegetated areas (can
mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none:
, ;.1
A) 0 - fi e
None = 0 points Low
=1 point Moderate = 2 points
1 1 '
".' f. . { }�.! o` a�.�y�' ) a ..
� t,,; rif1 Appp
f�i JAJt 1 SJ 4.:
. }
u
..
x , ,
4 1 ,i **tithe
4,F t�1dY,1 .{� 'Q`�0 :,
i, . 7° '4a4
V oV !M O(.�
Yo J.... 7 . X'
lk
,, ,,, ,1 �
braided channels]
[riparian
High = 3 points
• NOTE: If you have four or more vegetation types or three vegetation types
and open water the rating is always "high ".
H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77)
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is
the number of points you put into the next column.
Large, downed, woody
debris within the wetland ( >4in. diameter and 6 ft long).
Standing snags (diameter
at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland
Undercut banks are present
for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation
extends at least 3.3 ft (Im)
over a stream for at least 33 ft (10m)
Stable steep banks of fine
material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for
denning ( >30degree slope)
OR signs of recent beaver activity are present
At least 'A acre of thin -
stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present
in areas that are permanently
amphibians)
or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg - laying by
Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants
H 1. TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat
• Add the scores in the column above
Comments
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
14 August2004
11 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species?
H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80)
0
Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest
scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for
definition of "undisturbed."
— 100 in (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
>95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer.
(relatively undisturbed also means no- grazing) Points = 5
— 100 in (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
> 50% circumference. Points = 4
— 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
>95% circumference. Points = 4
— 100 in (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
> 25% circumference, . Points = 3
— 50 in (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water
for > 50% circumference. Points = 3
If buffer does not meet any of the three criteria above •
— No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland >
95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2
— No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference.
Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK.. Points = 2
— Heavy grazing in buffer. Points =1
- Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference
(e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0.
— Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1
H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (seep. 81)
•
0
H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated
corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover
of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other .
wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian
corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the
corridor).
YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2
H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated
corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of
shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands
that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an
undisturbed corridor as in the question above?
YES =2 points (go toH2.3) NO= H2.2.3
H 2.2.3 Is the wetland:
within 5 mi (81cm) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR
within 3 mi of a large field or pasture ( >40 acres) OR
within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres?
YES = point NO = 0 points
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
15
August 2004
H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (seep. 82)
Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland?
(see text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats)
Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains
elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres).
Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft.
Old - growth forests: (Old- growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree
species, forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at
least 20 trees/ha (8 trees /acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age.
Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown
cover may be less that 100 %; crown cover may be less that 100 %; decay,
decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally
less than that found in old - growth; 80 - 200 years old west of the Cascade crest.
Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants)
where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community.
Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 m (0.5 -
6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap
slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs
Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected
passages
Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations
where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25 %.
Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the
open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space
functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that
would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural
habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development.
Estuary/Estuary - like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually
semi - enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the
open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater
runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the
open ocean by evaporation. Along some low- energy coastlines there is appreciable
dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where
ocean - derived salts measure less than 0.5% during the period of average annual low
flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons.
Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones
of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the
terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are
important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline
function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control).
If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points
If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points
If wetland has 1 priority habitat =1 point No habitats = 0 points
0
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
16
August 2004
H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the
wetland that best fits) (see p. 84)
There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, and the connections between them
are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with
some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields,
or other development. points = 5
The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake -
fringe wetlands within '/a mile points = 5
There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, BUT the connections between them
are disturbed points = 3
The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake -
fringe wetland within'/ mile points = 3
There is at least 1 wetland within 1/2 mile. points = 2
There are no wetlands within'` /z mile. points = 0
3
H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat
Add the scores in the column above
3
Total Score for Habitat Functions — add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on
P. 1
S
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
17 August 2004
Wetland Type
Check off any criteria that apply to • the wetland. Circle the appropriate Category .
when the appropriate criteria are met.
Category
SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (seep. 86)
Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
— The dominant water regime is tidal,
— Vegetated, and
— With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt.
YES= Go toSC1.1 NO
.
SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,
National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational,
Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332 -30 -151?
YES = Category I NO go to SC 1.2
Cat. I
SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least I acre in size and meets at least two of the
following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II
— The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling,
cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non - native plant
species. If the non - native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover
more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual
rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the
relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a
Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in
determining the size threshold of 1 acre.
— At least 3 /4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un -mowed grassland.
— The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels,
• depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands.
Cat. I
Cat. II
Dual
rating
VII
CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the
appropriate answers and Category.
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
18 August 2004
SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 87)
Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage
Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support
state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species.
SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a
Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites
before you need to contact 1VNHP /DNR)
S/T /R information from Appendix D or accessed from WNHP /DNR web site
YES — contact WNHP/DNR (see 79) and go to SC 3.2 NO
SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as
or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species?
YES = Category I NO
SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87)
Does the wetland (or part of the wetland) meet both the criteria for soils and
vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you
answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
1. Does the wetland have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil),
either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches
of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic
soils)? Yes - go to Q. 3 No - go to Q. 2
2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than
16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or
volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond?
Yes - go to Q. 3 No - Is not a bog for purpose of rating
3. Does the wetland have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level,
AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3
as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total
shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)?
Yes — Is a bog for purpose of rating No - go to Q. 4
NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory
you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that
seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the
"bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog.
3. Is the wetland forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir,
western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen,
Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or
combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a
significant component of the ground cover ( > , 3 '0% coverage of the total
shrub /herbaceous cover)?
4, YES = Category I No 11 Is not a bog for purpose of rating
Cat. I
Cat. I
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
19
August 2004
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 20
August 2004
SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90)
Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the
Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you
will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
— Old- growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species,
forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8
trees /acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a
diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more.
NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.
Two - hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh
because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR"
so old - growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter.
— Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are
80 – 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches
(53cm); crown cover may be less that 100 %; decay, decadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that/found
in old- growth.
YES = Category I NO V
Cat. I
SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (see p. 91)
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon?
— The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly
or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks,
shingle, or, less frequently, rocks
— The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is
saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most/of the year in at least a portion
of the lagoon (needs to be measured n �- the bottom)
YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO f /not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions?
— The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling,
cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant
species (see list of invasive species on p. 74).
— At least 3 /4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un -mowed grassland.
Cat. I
— The wetland is larger than 1 /10 acre (4350 square feet)
YES = Category I NO = Category II
Cat. II
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington 20
August 2004
SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (see p. 93)
Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland
Ownership or WBUO)?
YES - go to SC 6.1 NO _ not an interdunal wetland for rating
If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its
functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
• Long Beach Peninsula- lands west of SR 103
• Grayland- Westport- lands west of SR 105
• Ocean Shores - Copalis- lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 .
SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
once acre or larger?
YES = Category II NO — go to SC 6.2
SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that
is between 0.l and 1 acre?
YES = Category III
Cat. IX
Cat. III
Wetland Rating Form — western Washington
21 August 2004
Flood Flow Alteration
Y
Depression holds sheet flow
Rather small
Sediment Removal
Y
Captures sediments from highway
Y
Protects Duwamish River
Nutrient & Toxicant Removal
Y
Nutrients & toxicants from highway.
Y
Protects Duwamish River
Erosion Control & Shoreline
Stabilization
N
Not adjacent to shoreline
Organic matter production and Export
N
No outlet
General Habitat Suitability
N
Minimal habitat value, and isolated.
Aquatic invertebrates habitat.
N
Intermittent inundation ', poor quality.
Seasonal ponding but very shallow and small
area.
Amphibians habitat
N
Intermittent I • shallow, water, poor quality.
I. Wetland is small, under 0.015 and its
depression is less than 10 in deep. Therefore, it
does not likely hold enough water long and deep
enough for amphibians or aquatic insects.
Wetland - Associated Mammal Habitat
N
No large pools.
.
Wetland - Associated Bird Habitat
N
No large pools
General Fish Habitat
N
Simple community, isolated
Native Plant Richness
N
Simple, degraded plant association
Educational or Scientific Value
N
Inaccessible, degraded.
Uniqueness and Heritage Values
N
Simple, degraded system
Wetland I.D. 1
Function/Value
Functions and Values for Wetland 1.
Wetland Functions & Values Form
SR 18 and SR 99 Median Crossover Protection Assessed by: C Plummer
Cowardin Class: PEM Ecology Category: IV Local Rating: III Wetland size: >0.015 ac Date: September 29, 2005
Occurrence
Y N
Rationale
Principal
Function(s
DOT Form 700-008 EF
Revised 5/99
Comments
•
7
Y
S
E.
4 W RANG I
'S o
^
x
s
- 8E�060
-.. — — — — -
5 '
SR 99
_ - -
—' _ _ II `~
- «ra- 1170—x,n —« —« ru — «,n— . —
rat «ra « `« n x CO— « r «,
, a«rn— «ru— «ra— xru — «,u— nT «;a— «r — — «ra— «,w — «,n —.,nom a • «,a r n— .,u- 1- .,n— .ry —.ra -Q
,n— «,nlx,a
)
J
_ Iz ITYPICAL,
N3e
!
t- IY 1TYPIUU
0
7W _�
g'g _5s
t IV 11 ERICA,
.�8
3 W 9
-
�`
WS
NWN
t
5S
m
.d
WITYPICAL1
-
— -Ev3—
�ra�r.e1«,. —. n --0.-- ra_,, .,r.,�
., ..:,„,,, —MT a «,a— «,Ee —«r.-
- -
^ '"
— « r.rA�.
-f— —
— Nrc.— — . .r
cs —«. — x a— x a—« rA.—« ra_xra — .,a . a —
-- - --
SR 99
-
0
1 00
--
00
L I3 ITrPIG.L1
NEE
\ �
90'
L le ITYPICALI
fW3
-
SECTION
SR 99
NOTE1 i0 xgOEN Sr.
MP 2J�N - IV 35.53
I. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS - PROTECTION AND RESTORATION NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND EXISTING IMPACT ATTENUATUR
NEiIA„0 TOYBOOTY EDGE DE LANE
— NTC - - - FO
C. E TENSION- EDGE OF PAVE1Exi
ti CABL BARPIFR
— — CEx,E,LLINE OF NEDIu
EXISTING GUARDRAIL +u. LANDS 1
xET
- s• EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
«vr NI. nsIelLlrr FENCE
-.I EXISTING CONC. BARRIER BERN TYPE 1
"•• NETLAND BUFFER
OF PROPERTY FOR MORK AREA RESTRICTIONS.
2. ALL TAPERS ARE MAX. 20,1, PER STANDARD PLAN. OR PER
MANUF ACTORS RECOMMENDATION.
3. ALL OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
IN A SR 9eRlon CrOes Over Pro tectIOn\CADO\SR IS
B ILE NAME S,\AR3o ;Y 44444 \ .y u1.
A Sit 9N.OM
."P
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
�
. A C
".�A
— -
Fa. Mrr
_
Washing) Maio
DEporhn.RE of Transportation
MEDIAN CROSS OVER PROTECTION
PLOT}
gag
DATE Illzi:aac
PLOTTED BY ■ 1.1'c
DESIGNED BY .1.IOM /R.OWEIS
10
WASH
�
P ° Sa
ENTERED BY AIWA
WEEkEO BY M.NIISAN
PA0..,...
......a
CABLE BARRIER PLAN - SR 99
PRO, ENG.. D. EDWAtDS
REGIONAL ADM. LEND
DATE
®
NA. HAP ma
REVISION
BY
AIM
Washington State
®® Department of Transportation
Douglas B. MacDonald
Secretary of Transportation
February 13, 2006
Ms Nora Gierloff
Planning Supervisor
Dept. of Community Development
City of Tukwila
Tukwila, Washington
RE: Shoreline Permit SR 99 & SR 18 Median Cross Over Protection
Dear Ms Gierloff:
Please find attached the requested materials in order to complete a Shoreline
Permit for the above project.
Enclosed is a check for $2,000 to cover the review cost. The
SEPA Categorical Exemption letter is enclosed.
Please notify Bob Caldwell if there is any additional information that you require or if
you have any questions regarding this project. Bob can be reached at 206- 440 -4907 or
you can email him at Caldwbp @wsdot.wa.gov.
Sincerely,
BB:bc
CC: File
Bob Caldwell
Ben wn
Environmental Documentation
Program Manager
Northwest Region
15700 Dayton Avenue North
P.O. Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133 -9710
206 -440 -4000
TTY: 1- 800 - 833 -6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
RECEWED
!FEB 14 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Washington State
®® Department of Transportation
Douglas B. MacDonald
Secretary of Transportation
February 13, 2006
Ms. Nora Gierloff
Planning Supervisor
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Wa. 98188 -2544
Dear Ms. Gierloff:
The SR99 Median Cross Over Protection project from MP 23.24 to MP 25.92 has been
determined as SEPA Categorical Exempt by the Washington State Department of Transportation.
In place of an Environmental Checklist for the Shoreline permit Application, WSDOT proposes
that the terminology expressed in the legal definitions and regulations below more adequately
expresses the SEPA determination. In absence of a critical area, we believe the following
regulations allow for this:
WAC 197 -11 -800 (2) (c)
The project is exempt and a SEPA checklist is unnecessary. Please contact Bob Caldwell if you
have questions. Bob can be reached at (206) 440 -4907.
Sincerely
J ohn Maas
Permit / Document Assist. Manager
JM/ be
Cc: File
L i//4
Northwest Region
15700 Dayton Avenue North
P.O. Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133 -9710
206 - 440 -4000
TTY: 1 -800- 833 -6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
RECEIVED
/FEB 1 4 1006
co MMUNITy
O LOPMENT
RE: Shoreline Permit Exemption
Environmental Checklist in Letter Format for SR 18 & SR
99 Median Cross Over Protection
STATE OF WASHINGTON
• •
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Sowhcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206)431-3665
E - mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS
PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
ss
COUNTY OF KING
The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows:
1. l am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application.
2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent.
4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property,
located at Median of SR99 S. Holden St and 116 Way
for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose.
5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's
entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City.
6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for
items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days.
7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund
of fees.
EXECUTED at (city), (state), on
&/✓.J4ln //✓ B, DID/ J
(Punt Arox 8304/D
(Addre 7t4 ) Y 2— QS-Z l�
(Phone Nu
(Sig
On this day personally appeared before me to me known to he the individual who executed the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned
therein.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My Commission expires on
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -SHORE
Planner: Ai 0 rsc-,_ �� r e-r4a
File Number: LO C -J) q
Application Complete (Date: f 4
Project File Number:
Application Incomplete (Date:
)
Other File Numbers:
•
CITY OF TUKWILA SHORELINE
Department of Community Development RE Ceive
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 D
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 FEB 1 PERMIT
E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us 4 2006'
DEVE Opm av
APPLICATION
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: SR 99 & SR 18 MEDIAN CROSS OVER PROTECTION
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision,
access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS.
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE MEDIAN OF SR 99 BETWEEN S. HOLDEN ST ON THE NORTH AND S. 116 WAY ON THE
SOUTH.
TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 04 EAST, SECTION 32
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 04 EAST, SECTION 4
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH , RANGE 04 EAST, SECTION 9
Quarter: Section: Township: Range:
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
S
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: Benjamin Brown
Address: 15700 Dayton Ave. North, Seattle Wa.
Phone: (206) 440 -4528 FAX: (206) 440 -4805
E - mail: BROW li E @WSDO .WA.GOV
Signature: `` Date:
/5t 06
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Pub C
Works and Planning
FEB 1
APPLICATION MATERIALS: CoMm
O ��OI
1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application.
V
2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies).
3. One set of 8 1/2" by 11" PMTs of the complete drawing set.
7
4. Application Fee $2,000.
5. SEPA Environmental Checklist (if required, see SEPA Application Packet)
PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS:
6. King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of
the subject lot
6/
7. Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses)
within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g.
apartments, condos, trailer parks- -must be included (see Public Notice Materials section)
8. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department
determining that the application is complete (see Public Notice Materials section).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS:
✓
9. Vicinity Map with site location.
10. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria (See Application). Check
with a planner if you are unsure of what criteria apply to your project.
11. If additional impervious surface is proposed provide a Technical Information Report (TIR)
including feasibility analysis per King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). For
additional guidance contact Public Works.
12. Provide sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC
18.45). Provide a geotechnical analysis of river bank stability if alteration is proposed.
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
13 (a) Landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of
all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect
stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings.
Maximum size 24" x 36 ".
(b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for
example fencing at drip line).
COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST
The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public
Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that
certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the
public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete.
ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED.
The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way
limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards.
City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community
Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works).
C \h,,, or\haw. \eler4nn V I4flRF. A..., nnr nun IKI
IVED
41 006
Nt
mavr
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public
Works and Planning
SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN:
/
14 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15 %, coal mine areas
and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and
proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood
elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36 ".
(b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures.
(c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained.
CIVIL PLANS:
47
15. (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed
professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36 ".
(b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations
to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area.
(c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals.
(d) Construction limit lines, areas of clearing/grading /filling and volume and type of expected
cut and fill.
(e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water,
sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of
purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth,
valve locations or the like are needed.
(f) If additional impervious surface is proposed provide a storm drainage design at least 90%
complete, which meets the TIR and KCSWDM. Include all storm drainage maintenance access
and safety features. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet.
(h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps.
(i) Footprints of all existing and proposed buildings.
(j) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls.
SHORELINE SITE PLAN:
16 (a) Existing top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water
mark and base flood elevation.
(b) For work riverward of the MHWM show the distance the work extends into the river and
distance to Federal projects and navigation channels.
(c) If the project is within the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program show the limits of the 40'
River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact Environments.
(d) Dike /riverbank maintenance easement if applicable (minimum 30' from the top of bank).
(e) Public access and/or trails.
(f) Construction limit lines, areas of clearing/grading /filling
(e) Parking lots, loading and service areas.
(h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks.
ray,„ r ,r,.a... ItiL F A ,,, one nun /Os
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS:
17 (a) Provide shoreline cross sections at maximum 75' intervals along the project riverfront.
(b) Show all existing and proposed improvements.
(c) If the project is within the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program show the limits of the 40'
River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact Environments.
(d) Existing top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water
mark and base flood elevation.
OTHER:
18. If project is not subject to design review submit dimensioned and scalable building elevations
with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening.
19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture
cut sheets, site light levels (foot - candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare.
rAti,,. ., ..,ao.\ o-..12 Virnlan„g\cunur• Ann nor ns /II na
• •
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
RECEI
I FEB 14 2006
o COMMUI
There are a number of items on the Shoreline Permit Application Checklist for
our SR 18 & SR 99 Median Crossover Protection Guardrail project that should be
waived. I will list below the items and the reasons that they are not applicable.
Please tell me if you agree or not.
Items:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
10. This project is in agreement with the criteria for projects subject to the City of
Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (TMC 18.44.110).
11 There are no plans for additional impervious surface.
12 (a) no proposed alteration of river bank.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
13 (a) (b) No trees exist on the median nor do we have plans to plant any.
SENSITIVE AREA PLAN
14 (b) Only one wetland was located and shown in the Wetland Delineation
report prepared for this application. The wetland is less than 1000 sf and is
exempt from regulation per TMC 18.45.180 A. Therefore the buffer for this
wetland is also exempt. None of this project is located on a stream frontage.
14 (c) There are no existing trees.
CIVIL PLANS
15 (b) There will be no profile sheets,
(d) There will be no clearing, grading /filling.
(e) There are no existing or proposed utility easements/ improvements.
(f) There is no additional proposed impervious surface.
(g) There are no existing or proposed buildings.
• •
(h) There are no existing or proposed fences, rockeries or retaining walls.
SHORELINE SITE PLAN
16 (a) There will be no in -river work.
(b) There is no riverward work.
(c) The project is not in the river or on the shoreline.
(d) There is no dike /riverbank easement.
(e) The project will not impact public access or trails.
(f) There will be no cleaning / grading filling.
(g) There are no parking lots, loading or service areas.
(h) There are no street furniture or bike racks or proposals to add any.
(i) The project will not affect the riverfront.
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
17 (c) The project is not in the river or on the shoreline.
18 No buildings, mechanical equipment or screening are proposed.
19 No additional lighting fixtures are proposed.
T. 24N.
•
•
•
S 112TH ST
BOEING
ACCESS
RD
Y 22 N
T LI N t
T 24 N
T 23 N
w
AUBUR
SEATTLE
END CONSTRUCTION
SR 99 MP 25.92
SEATTL
END C. TRUCTION
SR MP 6.93
SECTION 2
SR 99
MP 23.24 - MP 25.92
0 1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
SR 99 MP 23.24
T. 23N. R. 4E.
ALL BRIDGES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS
NOT INCULDED IN PROJECT
RECEIVED
'FEB 14 2006
OEVELOrIICNT
0 2 4
SCALE IN MILES
T. 21N
BEGIN CONST
SR 18 MP 6
SECTION 1
SR 18
MP 6.47- MP 6.93
0 1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
BLACK
DIAMOND
A
FILE NAME
S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over ProtectIon \CADD \SR IB & SR 99.dpn
9:06:21 AM
TIME
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY
J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L.ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
NO.
1 0
STATE
WASH
JOB INFER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
P.E. STOP BOX
DATE
i
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
VICINITY MAP
PLOT1
Vl
SKEET
3r1
SHEETS
GROUP NUMBER
SR
CONTROL SECTION
TAX SCHEDULE
FUND PARTICIPANTS
1
018
172406
•"
FEDERAL
2
099
172902
re
STATE
3
099
172905
••
STATE
4
099
172901
44
STATE
5
099
172901
i '
STATE
ITEM
NO
TOTAL
QUANTITY
SUB -TOTAL
SECTION
1- 07.2(1)
OF
STANDARD
SPECS
SUB-TOTAL
**
SECTION
1- 07.2(2)
OF
STANDARD
SPECS
STD.
ITEM
NO.
UNIT
ITEM
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
LUMP SUM
600.00
520.00
1.00
30.00
30.00
10.00
900.00
450.00
4.00
120.00
750.00
2010.00
70.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
13600.00
LUMP SUM
1.00
204.00
1.00
204.00
1.00
LUMP SUM
204.00
186.00
LUMP SUM
96.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
LUMP SUM
GROUP LEGEND:
LUMP SUM
600.00
520.00
1.00
30.00
30.00
10.00
900.00
450.00
4.00
120.00
750.00
1.00 7480
1.00 7725
1.00 7728
LUMP SUM 7736
0001 L.S.
LF
0 , ems
0182 EACH
PREPARATION
MOBILIZATION
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
REMOVING GUARDRAIL
REMOVING GUARDRAIL ANCHOR
GRADING
0431 TON GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL
0470 C.Y. EMBANKMENT COMPACTION
_ s., - <. P1 �='a: ,t.±'°S.�e 1�'W'tiaxn ..x .. _�'.�>'':• ., . rYr!�,� ;''. �'in
EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING
6403 DAY ESC LEAD
6419 S.Y. SEEDING AND FERTILIZING BY HAND
6373 L.F. SILT FENCE
6478 EACH STRAW BALE
6479 L.F. WATTLE
6500 L.F. COMPOST SOCK
TRAFFIC
2010.00 6751 L.F. BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
70.00 6759 L.F. BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 10
5.00 6760 EACH BEAM GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 1
1.00 6716 EACH BEAM GUARDRAIL FLARED TERMINAL
1.00 6737 EACH BEAM GUARDRAIL BULL NOSE TERMINAL
2.00 6774 EACH BEAM GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 4
13600.00 L.F. HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER
LUMP SUM LS. ADDITIONAL HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER COMPONENTS
1.00 7447 EACH TRUCK - MOUNTED IMPACT ATTENUATOR
204.00 7449 HOUR OPERATION OF TRUCK - MOUNTED IMPACT ATTENUATOR
1.00 7450 DOL REPAIR TRUCK - MOUNTED IMPACT ATTENUATOR
204.00 6956 HOUR SEQUENTIAL ARROW SIGN
1.00 6994 EACH PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN
LUMP SUM 6964 L.S. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
204.00 6995 HOUR OPERATION OF PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN
186.00 6992 HOUR OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR
LUMP SUM 6974 L.S. TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR
96.00 6982 S.F. CONSTRUCTION SIGNS CLASS A
OTHER ITEMS
DOL ROADSIDE CLEANUP
DOL REIMBURSEMENT FOR THIRD PARTY DAMAGE
DOL MINOR CHANGE
L.S. SPCC PLAN
GROUP 1
SR18
MP6.47 TO
MP6.93
GROUP 2
SR99
MP23.24 TO
MP24.17
GROUP 3
SR99
MP24.17 TO
MP24.86
GROUP 4
SR99
MP24.86 TO
MP25.92
GROUP 5
THIRD
PARTY
DAMAGES
L.S.
150.00
520.00
1.00
30.00
30.00
4.00
100.00
300.00
1.00
60.00
2,010.00
70.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
51.00
0.40
52.00
L.S.
52.00
54.00
L.S.
48.00
0.25
0.25
L.S.
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
L.S.
2.00
300.00
110.00
1.00
60.00
150.00
4,860.00
L.S.
1.00
50.00
0.20
52.00
1.00
L.S.
52.00
45.00
L.S.
16.00
0.25
0.25
L.S.
L.S.
450,00
2.00
200.00
25.00
1.00
250.00
3,540.00
L.S.
52.00
0.20
50.00
L.S.
50.00
45.00
L.S.
16.00
0.25
0.25
L.S.
L.S.
2.00
300.00
15.00
1.00
350.00
5,200.00
L.S.
51.00
0.20
50.00
L.S.
50.00
42.00
L.S.
16.00
0.25
0.25
L.S.
1.00
RECEIVED
`FEB 14 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DOT_RGG900
1/31/2006
DATE
REVISION
BY
REGION
1
STATE
WA
JOB NUMBER
06A007/1
CONTRACT NO
000000
FEDERAL AID PROJECT. NO.
NH- 0018(033)
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 1B &SR99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
Sal
SHEET
2
O \ F
HS EEf?"--1
EDGE OF EDGE OF
TRA' /FLED WAY PAVED SHOULDER
2.0'
SR 18 MP 6.47 TO MP 6.59 (WESTBOUND)
SR 18 MP 6.74 TO MP 6.93 (WESTBOUND)
EDGE OF EDGE OF
TRAVELED WAY PAVED SHOULDER
GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
SR18
MEDIAN
L
GUARDRAIL TYPE 1 GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
-,i
MEDIAN SECTION A
N.T.S.
SR18
MEDIAN
MEDIAN SECTION B
SR18 MP 6.59 TO MP 6.62
N.T.S.
SR18 MP 6.47 TO MP 6.49 (EASTBOUND)
(SEE NOTE 6)
VARIES
0' TO 4
GRAVEL BORROW
EDGE OF
PAVED SHOULDER
EDGE OF
TRAVELED WAY
EDGE OF
PAVED SHOULDER
EDGE OF
TRAVELED WAY
SOUTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EDGE OF
PAVED
EDGE OF SHOULDER
TRAVELED WAY
VARIES
7' TO 12
(SEE SHEET CBI)
EDGE OF
PAVED
EDGE OF SHOULDER
TRAVELED WAY
VARIES
14' TO 16'
NOTE:
1. ALL OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
2. AVOID INSTALLING CABLE BARRIER WITHIN 1' TO 6' OFFSET OF THE DITCH CENTER LINE.
3. N.S.T. = NOT STEEPER THAN
4. N.T.S. = NOT TO SCALE
5. SEE SHEET CBI FOR LOCATIONS OF HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER.
6. SEE SHEET GRD1 FOR DETAILS.
16'
SR 99
MEDIAN
DITCH
1
(SEE NOTE 2)
\5 I
� I �
1'11'
MEDIAN SECTION C
MP 23.25 TO MP 24.80
MP 24.82 TO MP 25.11
MP 25.13 TO MP 25.36
•MP 25.40 TO MP 25.91
SR 99
EXISTING MEDIAN CROSSOVER
DITCH
•
HIGH TENSION
CABLE BARRIE R
..
TcH fX �S�STING 10:1 SLOPE I EX151NG 1�:1 St0? Fy N.
OpE
ON-
MEDIAN SECTION D
MP 23.28
MP 24.33
VARIES
14' TO 16'
16'
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
EDGE OF
PAVED
SHOULDER
VARIES
7' TO 12'
(SEE SHEET CBI)
ROADWAY EXCAVATION
INCL. HAUL
EDGE OF
TRAVELED WAY
NORTHBOUND
HIGH TENSION
CABLE BARRIER
EDGE OF
PAVED
SHOULDER
12'
EDGE OF
TRAVELED WAY
NORTHBOUND
RECEIVED
FEB 1 4 2005
o 0 P
0 E/E .
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR (8 & SR 99.dgn
TIME 10:04:45 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y.OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION STATE
NO.
10 WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
EXPIRES SEP 2E 20011
P.E. STAMP SOD
DATE
P.E. STAMP BON
DATE
WfiiF
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
MEDIAN /SHOULDER SECTIONS
PLOT3
M S1
SHEET
GF
21
SHEETS
QUANTITY TABULATION
NOTE:
THE FIRST NUMBER OF THE "CODE" BELOW
REFERS TO THE SHEET NO. OR THE SHEET
REFERENCE NO. SHOWING THE
CONSTRUCTION FEATURE.
THE SECOND NUMBER REFERS TO THE
CONSTRUCTION FEATURE FOUND ON THAT
SHEET.
CODE
GR1
GR1
GR1
GR2
GR2
GRI -GR2
TESC3
CB1
CB1
CB1
CB1
CB1
CB1
CB1
DESIGNED BY
ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY
PROJ. ENGR.
REGION ADM.
LOCATION v \ UNIT OF MEASURE ➢
SR 18
MP 6.47 (4' RT) TO MP 6.62 (4' RT)
MP 6.47 (4' LT) TO MP 6.49 (4' LT)
MP 6.59 (8' LT) TO MP 6.62 (4' LT)
MP 6.71 (4' LT) TO MP 6.72 (4' RT)
MP 6.74 (4' RT) TO MP 6.93 (4' RT)
MP 6.47 TO MP 6.93
SR 99
MP 23.25 (19' LT) TO MP 23.27 (19' LT)
MP 23.25 (12' LT) TO MP 24.80 (12' LT)
MP 24.51 (LT & RT) TO MP 24.53 (LT & RT)
MP 24.82 (12' LT) TO MP 25.11 (12' LT)
MP 25.13 (12' LT) TO MP 25.36 (12' LT)
MP 25. 39 TO MP 25.40 (LT & RT)
MP 25.41 TO MP 25.91
MP 23.25 TO MP 25.92
SHEET TOTAL
PROJECT TOTAL
J. KIM
J. KIM
M. HASAN
D. EDWARDS
L. ENG
02/06/06
DATE
DATE
W
U
z
w
w
H
J_
CO
Cr)
S
2
L.F.
50
100
450
600
600
>-
m
C7
z
N
J
CC
w
z
z
w z
Lu
(n
S.Y.
100
800
900
900
REVISION
W
U
z
w
LL
J
L.F.
80
60
120
40
110
25
15
450
450
BY
REGION NO.
10
w
cr
J
m
cc
H
U)
EACH
3
4
4
STATE
WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
w
J
L.F.
60
60
120
120
0
U)
I-
U)
0
o_
2
0
U
L.F.
350
130
140
130
750
750
FED. AID PROJ. NO.
NH- 0018(033)
L.F.
800
80
100
1030
2010
2010
0
W
d
I-
_ J
cc
Q
2
W
m
L.F.
70
70
70
z
0
F
z
Q
F-
J
Q W
Q }
�z
O
W W
EOtn
EACH
2
5
5
EACH
Wi Washington State
4; Department of Transportation
3, 8,11
3,7,8,12
2,3,5,8,9,11
2,4,6,10
2, 3,12
15
13
2
16
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEE SPECIAL PROVISION °HIGH TENSION
CABLE BARRIER °.
2. SEE SPECIAL PROVISION °ORDER OF WORK °.
3. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -1
4. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -1A
5. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -2A
6. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -2C
7. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -2J
B. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -3
9. SEE STANDARD PLAN C-4B
10. SEE STANDARD PLAN C-4F
11. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -5
12. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -6C
13. SEE STANDARD PLAN 1 -6
14. SEE STANDARD PLAN I -11
15. SEE STANDARD PLAN H -1, USE TYPE Y
GUIDE POST REFLECTIVE SHEETING
16. SEE STANDARD PLAN H -1d
RECEIVED
FEB 1 4 2006
C OMMUNITY
nF�is l �f 4mR3 1
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
QUANTITY TABULATION
QT 1
SHEET
4
OF
21
SHEETS
QUANTITY TABULATION
NOTE:
THE
REFERS
REFERENCE
CONSTRUCTION
THE
CONSTRUCTION
SHEET.
CODE
FIRST NUMBER OF THE 'CODE' BELOW
TO THE SHEET NO. OR THE SHEET
NO. SHOWING THE
FEATURE.
SECOND NUMBER REFERS TO THE
FEATURE FOUND ON THAT
c
z
co Q
ct
Q _1
0 z
¢ ¢
co
O
�
Q
��
¢a
mH
Lu
co
U
Z
0
r
w w
1- _
0
2m
Cf)
w
o
0
m
W
Li.
O
z
cc
z
w
W
W
cn
GENERAL NOTES:
LOCATION v \ UNIT OF MEASURE ➢
EACH
EACH
L.F.
EACH
•
QT 2
1. SEE SPECIAL PROVISION 'HIGH TENSION
.
CABLE BARRIER'.
SR 18
2. SEE SPECIAL PROVISION 'ORDER
OF WORK'.
3. SEE STANDARD PLAN C
GR1
MP 6.47 (4' RT) TO MP 6.62 (4' RT)
3,9,11
-1
4. SEE STANDARD PLAN C 1A
5. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -2A
6. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -2C
7. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -2J
8. SEE STANDARD PLAN C-3
9. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -4B
10. SEE STANDARD PLAN C-4F
11. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -5
12. SEE STANDARD PLAN C -6C
13. SEE STANDARD PLAN 1 -6
14. SEE STANDARD PLAN I -11
15. SEE STANDARD PLAN H -1, USE TYPE 'Y
GUIDE POST REFLECTIVE SHEETING
16. SEE STANDARD PLAN H 1d
RECEIVED
'FEB 1 4 2006
COMMUNITY
D EVEL,OPlisP nr
SR 18 & SR 99
CROSSOVER PROTECTION
GR1
MP 6.47 (4' LT) TO MP 6.49 (4' LT)
1
3,7,8,12
GR1
MP 6.59 (8' LT) TO MP 6.62 (4' LT)
2,3,5,8,9,11
GR2
MP 6.71 (4' LT) TO MP 6.72 (4' RT)
1
2,4,6,10
GR2
MP 6.74 (4' RT) TO MP 6.93 (4' RT)
1
2,3,12
GR1 -GR2
MP 6.47 TO MP 6.93
64
15
SR 99
TESC3
MP 23.25 (19' LT) TO MP 23.27 (19' LT)
13
CB1
MP 23.25 (12' LT) TO MP 24.80 (12' LT)
8190
1
CB1
MP 24.51 (LT & RT) TO MP 24.53 (LT & RT)
2
CB1
MP 24.82 (12' LT) TO MP 25.11 (12' LT)
1540
1
CB1
MP 25.13 (12' LT) TO MP 25.36 (12' LT)
1220
1
CB1
MP 25. 39 TO MP 25.40 (LT & RT)
6
16
CB1
MP 25.41 TO MP 25.91
2650
1
CB1
MP 23.25 TO MP 25.92
SHEET TOTAL
1
2
13600
70
PROJECT
TOTAL
1
2
13600
70
NO.
State
of Transportation
MEDIAN
REGION NO.
STATE
FED. AID PROJ.
10
WASH
NH- 0018(033)
DESIGNED BY
J. KIM
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
02/06/06
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
JOB NUMBER
06A007
Washington
VW Department
SHEET
5
OF
21
SHEETS
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGION ADM.
L. ENG
CONTRACT NO.
QUANTITY TABULATION
DATE
DATE
REVISION
BY
EXISTING UTILITY SCHEDULE
SR 99 M.P.
COMPANY
TYPE
REF. LOCATION
RUNS
COMMENT
25.11
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
GAS
S. HENDERSON ST.
W -E
25.29
OWEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE /TV
8TH AVE S.
N -S
25.32
OWEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE /TV
S. DONOVAN ST.
W -E
25.66
OWEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE /TV
S. SOUTHERN ST.
W -E
25.70
OWEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE /TV
5TH AVE S.
N -S
25.85
OWEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE /TV
S. KENYON ST.
W -E
25.85
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT.
POWER
S. KENYON ST.
W -E
25.04
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. DIRECTOR ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
25.06
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
10TH AVE. S.
N -S
ENDS PLUGGED
25.11
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. HENDERSON ST.
N -S
ENDS PLUGGED
25.20
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. CONCORD ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
25.45
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
SULLIVAN ST.
W -E
ACTIVE
25.67
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. SOUTHERN ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
25.73
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. ELMGROVE ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
25.80
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. MONROE ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
25.85
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
S. KENYON ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
25.91
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
WATER
CHICAGO ST.
W -E
ENDS PLUGGED
NOTE:
1. THIS UTILITY SCHEDULE INCLUDES ONLY BURIED UTILITIES WITHIN MEDIAN.
2. NO UTILITY CONFLICT IS ANTICIPATED ON SR 18 WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
COMMUNI
D EVELOPMENT
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR IB & SR 99.dgn
TIME 9:07 :20 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y.OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
NO.
STATE
10 WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
Washington State
Deportment of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
EXISTING UTILITY
PLOT13
UT1
SHEET
6
OF
21
SHEETS
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
S 18
M' 6
7An971Tm4,7770,7T4,7,707777/ml7' !7/97!7777
NOTE:
OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED LANE.
MP 6.47 (4' RT)
BEGIN SILT FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD2)
END SILT FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD2)
zeKte� 1!L! /,L![C71!!L//1!L/e.c
LEGEND
x —x— SILT FENCE
WATTLE CHECK DAM
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
GUARDRAIL
EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
- H V
-x– –x-
RIGHT OF WAY
EDGE OF LANE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
EXISTING FENCE
To21N. Ro5Eo W.M.
MP 6.57 (MEDIAN)
WATTLE CHECK DAM
(SEE STANDARD PLAN I -11)
MP 6.48 (4' LT)
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
MP 6.62 (4' RT)
"7:77.77777 ��,7:77,7i77/7/77/7/7717T"7/77�� /7,7i7779i7j>TTj7;7717,77� 777 BEGIN H IGH TD2, VISIBILITY L FENCE
BEGIN SILT FENCE
/7/771Tm /77,77)7,77,77,777,7771,-,>77,7%77/77/77/7;77/7"
LL /1 t !L 4 [!!L /11 !1 /1 !!1/1 !!1 /1 !!L /1 ! !1 /1 t 111 ! !1 /
177/7:177/7/77,7,7
UJUD
2 LU
J CL W
_ W
LJ
W
CC
L�J
MP 6.62 (4' LT)
END SILT FENCE
END HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD2. TD3)
11L1111 a- m-a-11
W
W
Cc
CD
er-a1t1J11LaGea- 11ZL
RECEI
'FEB 1 4 200
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR IB & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR IB & SR 99.dgn
9:06:53 AM
TIME
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y.OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION STATE
NO.
10 WASH
JOB EONBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BON
DATE
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TESC PLAN - SR 18
PLOTS .
TESC1
SHEE
7
21
SHEETS
_____ _____________________- —
W
• W t0 5-
_Z F
O_ W
W
U CO
~ W
y N
--------------- ------- --- --- ------- - - --- -- --- ----- --- --- - - - -- --
------- - •rte _
-- --- ----------- --- - - - - -- _ �c�
B E G N 7 S ( T F L T
BEGIN HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE - - -X - - 211L1111/J111x/1![1J1111[!/ 11 1!! 1/ 111r/11�1111J111r/111111J11[!/�
x- - - ! 1 /�tL/11l1/11L1/�!1/11l1x/1 x x
x X _ -x- -x- -
(SEE SHEET 703, TE4)
1 ! [!J1 ! 11�� !1/1 ! llll � �� !1 /� !1 /� !1 /1 ! !d/11 !1/1 ! !1/1. �� ! �� X11 !1/.1 ! !1 /1 ! !1 /
u/11 LL/.1l11J1!lll�tl/111v. ���11 /
r'177'7,7-,77,7777, 7 rr7nrrmrr 777/77/7 77rr rrrnrr�nrr�T7rrrT7 vrm�'� -
f m m?7/m 7 / 77 mr
/7/771 T?7 /Tm / 7 777 / T177 / 7 / 77 / 7777 /7777
END CONSTURCTION
SR 18 MP 6.93
C MP 6.72 (4' RT)
END SILT FENCE
END HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD3. TD4)
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
TIME 9:06:58 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE BY
MP 6.74 (MEDIAN)
SILT FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD3)
REGI STATE FED. A I D PROJ
No.
10 WASH
JOB NUDGER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
To21N. R.5E. W.M.
NOTE:
OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED LANE.
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
P.E. STAMP BON
DATE
RECEIV
(FEB 14 2uu6
COMMUNITY
DEVEI ()P y
P.C. STAB BOY
DATE
_ --i
Washington State
Department of Transportation
fr
--1'-- "'I.-...
TESC PLAN - SR 18
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
ED
LEGEND
_X—x—
SILT FENCE
WATTLE CHECK DAM
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
GUARDRAIL
EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
RIGHT OF WAY
EDGE OF LANE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
EXISTING FENCE
PLOT10
TESC2
SNE T
Or
21
SHEETS
SR 99 MP 23. 27 (MEDIAN)
NOTE:
I. SEE SHEET TOI FOR LOCATIONS OF CATCH BASIN AND PROTECTION DETAILS.
2. OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
=7 _
r - T
DUWAMISH RIVER
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
SR 99 MP 23.25
LEGEND
-x - x— SILT FENCE
WATTLE
— —i- EXISTING GUARDRAIL
EXISTING IMPACT ATTENUATOR
LJ
EXISTING CATCH BASIN
— HT CB HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER
EDGE OF LANE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
— - — CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
SR 99 MP 23.25 (19' LT)
BEGIN SILT FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD2)
SR 99
SR 99 MP 23.27 (19' LT)
l END SILT FENCE
i —1_
(SEE SHEET TD2>
11 4 ___" - --
1 `. a 'la. 1.•■••
To23No Ro4E. W.M.
MP 23.26 (MEDIAN CENTER)
EXISTING CATCH BASIN •1
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FOR INLET PROTECTION
(SEE STANDARD PLAN I-6)
WATTLE CHECK DAM
(SEE STANDARD PLAN I -11)
4,„
0 50
SCALE IN
100
FEET
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
DEVI Lop
FILE NAME
S:\412348 \SR (8 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR I8 & SR 99.dgn
9:07:48 AM
TIME
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY
J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
NO.
10
STATE
WASH
JOB MINCER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STOP BOX
DATE
P.C. STAMP BOX
DATE
i F4PAli F
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TESC PLAN - SR 99
PLOT19'
TESC3
SHEE T
9
21
SHEETS
___ _ ! HTC=
_
HTCB�
SR 99 MP 24.38 (MEDIAN CENTER)
EXISTING CATCH BASIN •18
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FOR INLET PROTECTION
(SEE STANDARD PLAN 1-6)
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
NOTE:
T. 23N 0 R a 4 E o W.M.
SR
1. SEE SHEET TD1 FOR LOCATIONS OF CATCH BASIN AND PROTECTION DETAILS.
2. OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
99 MP 24.45 (MEDIAN CENTER)
EXISTING CATCH BASIN •19
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FOR INLET PROTECTION
(SEE STANDARD PLAN I -6)
SR 99 MP 24.50
BEGIN HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD3 FOR DETAIL)
SR 99 MP 24.54
END HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
(SEE SHEET TD3 FOR DETAIL)
WETLAND 1
WETLAND BUFFER
v�-
LEGEND
�(vr
SILT FENCE
WATTLE
rn
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
EXISTING IMPACT ATTENUATOR
EXISTING CATCH BASIN
ALIJA
,u, WETLAND
WETLAND BOUNDARY
WETLAND BUFFER
— t4TC3-- HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER
EDGE OF LANE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
— CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
FILE NAME
S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
9:07:52 AM
TIME
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
NO.
STATE
10 WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FEO.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCA No.
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
P.E. STAMP Box
DATE
i//
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TESC PLAN - SR 99
RECE�
FEe 1 4 2OOfi
DEVELOP
com
PL0 1�2 0
TESC4
SHEET
21
SHEETS
FILE NAME
TIME
NOTE:
1. SEE SHEET TDI FOR LOCATIONS OF CATCH BASIN AND PROTECTION DETAILS.
2. OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
5: \412348 \5R IB & SR 99 Medion Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.d n
9:07:43 AM
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY
DESIGNED BY
ENTERED BY
kimjc
J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
1
DATE
BY
REGION STATE
NO.
10 WASH
JON NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
To24No Ro4Eo W.M.
FED.AID PROJ.NO
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
P.E. STAID BOX
DATE
SR 99 MP 25.90 (MEDIAN CENTER)
EXISTING CATCH BASIN A38
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE FOR INLET PROTECTION
(SEE STANDARD PLAN I -6)
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
END CONSTURCTION
SR 99 MP 25.93
Washington State
Department of Transportation
T HTC HTCB— HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB —HTCB =H HTCB —HfC6 MfiEB- r _ _ r' _A=C. X -- -
HTCB —H CB Tr - _ � � ___ -__ �— — =s =1 -1
I - ' — - _ _ 4: u
— HTCB — HTCB— HTCB — HTCB — HTCB - -HTCB— ! _ - I y - _ -- _ �- - -- - L J - --
LEGEND
x x SILT FENCE
-I- —I- EXISTING GUARDRAIL
LJ
WATTLE
EXISTING IMPACT ATTENUATOR
EXISTING CATCH BASIN
______I EXISTING CONC. BARRIER BERM TYPE I
— HTCB — HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER
EDGE OF LANE
- - -- EDGE OF PAVEMENT
--- CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TESC PLAN - SR 99
ReCeiv
FEB 1 4 2 oc
°E yyt
SKEET
11
SHEETS
06
PLOT17
TESC5
MEDIAN EX. CATCH BASINS
SR 99
MILE POST
FEATURE
DESCRIPTION
COMPOST
QTY.
23.26
CATCH
BASIN
#1
CULVERT #2
23.49
CATCH
BASIN
#2
12'
23.59
CATCH
BASIN
#3
12'
23.67
CATCH
BASIN
#4
12'
23.72
CATCH
BASIN
#5
12'
23.82
CATCH
BASIN
#6
12'
23.88
CATCH
BASIN
#7
12'
23.96
CATCH
BASIN
#8
12'
24.01
CATCH
BASIN
#9
12'
24.06
CATCH
BASIN
#10
12'
24.11
CATCH
BASIN
#11
12'
24.14
CATCH
BASIN
#12
12'
24.19
CATCH
BASIN
#13
12'
24.23
CATCH
BASIN
#14
12'
24.30
CATCH
BASIN
#15
12'
24.34
CATCH
BASIN
#16
12'
24.36
CATCH
BASIN
#17
' 12'
* 24.38
CATCH
BASIN
#18
* 24.45
CATCH
BASIN
#19
24.54
CATCH
BASIN
#20
12'
24.56
CATCH
BASIN
#21
12'
24.64
CATCH
BASIN
#22
12'
24.68
CATCH
BASIN
#23
12'
24.80
CATCH
BASIN
#24
12'
25.09
CATCH
BASIN
#25
12'
25.16
CATCH
BASIN
#26
12'
25.48
CATCH
BASIN
#27
12'
25.52
CATCH
BASIN
#28
12'
25.56
CATCH
BASIN
#29
12'
25.60
CATCH
BASIN
#30
12'
25.64
CATCH
BASIN
#31
12'
25.67
CATCH
BASIN
#32
12'
25.71
CATCH
BASIN
#33
12'
25.75
CATCH
BASIN
#34
12'
25.79
CATCH
BASIN
#35
12'
25.83
CATCH
BASIN
#36
12'
25.86
CATCH
BASIN
#37
12'
25.90
CATCH
BASIN
#38
COMPOST SOCK
SUB
TOTAL
408'
MEDIAN EX. CROSS CULVERT
SR 99
MILE POST
FEATURE
DESCRIPTION
COMPOST
QUANTITY
24.45
CULVERT #1
20'
24.48
CULVERT #2
20'
24.60
CULVERT #3
20'
24.71
CULVERT #4
20'
24.75
CULVERT #5
20'
24.82
CULVERT #6
20'
24.89
CULVERT #7
20'
24.92
CULVERT #8
20'
24.96
CULVERT #9
20'
25.05
CULVERT #10
20'
25.21
CULVERT #11
20'
25.23
CULVERT #12
20'
25.25
CULVERT #13
20'
25.28
CULVERT #14
20'
25.32
CULVERT #15
20'
25.36
CULVERT #16
20'
COMPOST SOCK
SUB TOTAL
320'
FILL WITH
COMPOST
COMPOST SOCK
NOT TO SCALE
BURLAP OR COIR FABRIC
SEE PLANS FOR LENGTH
OF COMPOST SOCK
STORM DRAIN
INLET
COMPOST SOCK DETAIL AROUND INLET
NOT TO SCALE
COMPOST SOCK
NOTE:
1. ALL CATCH BASIN WILL BE PROTECTED BY COMPOST SOCK
EXCEPT CATCH BASINS °1, #18, °19 AND #38
2. FOR CATCH BASINS #1, *18. #19 AND .38, USE TEMPORARY SILT FENCE.
(SEE STANDARD PLAN I -6)
0
w
C/
0
w
EXISTING ‘.1
CROSS CULVERT
MEDIAN CENTER LINE
1. MIN. �A••�
•
RECEIVED
HIGH TENSION
CABLE BARRIER
COMPOST SOCK
POST
POST
POST
COMPOST SOCK DETAIL
AT CROSS CULVERT
NOT TO SCALE
* SEE STANDARD PLAN 1 -6 FOR DETAIL
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
TIME 9:06:49 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION s1ATE
NO.
1 0
WASH
JOB NUIBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BO%
`FEB
COM
DEVEL
DATE
1 2006
,AUNITY
OPMENT
P.E. STAN BOX
DATE
WI/
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TESC DETAILS
PLOT7
TD1
WET
DT
21
SHEETS
2 x 4 WOOD POSTS
STANDARD OR BETTER
ALTERNATE: STEEL FENCE POSTS
CONSTRUCTION GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL
BACKFILL TRENCH (SEE NOTE 6)
2 "x 4" -14 GA. WIRE
FABRIC FENCE OR EOUIV.
2 x 4 -14 GA. WIRE
FABRIC FENCE OR EOUIV.
8" X 12"
TRENCH
8.0 FT MAX.
SILT FENCE
SILT FENCE ELEVATION
SILT FENCE STAKING DETAIL
CONSTRUCTION GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL 5 FT
WIDE ROLLS; USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS
TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE AND POST
111111111 „111, II
111111111111111?
1111111111111111
11111111111111111
11111111111111111!
1111111111111111111 1
1111111111111111111.
v •o
1
•
x 4” WOOD POSTS
STANDARD OR BETTER
ALTERNATE: STEEL FENCE POSTS
BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL
IN 8" X 12 " TRENCH.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. THE FILTER FABRIC FOR SILT FENCE SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL . 60 INCHES WIDE.
CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, THE FILTER
FABRIC SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST. WITH A MINIMUM 6 INCHES OVERLAP, AND
BOTH ENDS SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST. SILT FENCES SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE CONTOUR AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE. EXCEPT AT THE ENDS OF THE FENCE, WHERE THE FENCE SHALL BE TURNED UPHILL SUCH THAT
THE SILT FENCE CAPTURES THE RUNOFF WATER AND PREVENTS WATER FROM FLOWING AROUND THE END OF THE FENCE.
2. THE FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 8.0 FT. APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND
(A MINIMUM OF 2.5 F1'.).
3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES WIDE BY 12 INCHES DEEP, UPSLOPE AND ADJACENT
TO THE POST TO ALLOW THE FILTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED.
4. THE 2" X 4" X 14 GAUGE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE
UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY -DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG, TIE WIRES,
OR HOG RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES AND SHALL NOT
EXTEND MORE THAN 2.5 FT. ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE.
5. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR WIRED TO THE FENCE, AND 1.5 FT. OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE
EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 2.5 FT. ABOVE THE ORIGINAL
GROUND SURFACE. FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO TREES.
6. THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH NATIVE MATERIAL OR WITH NO. 4 CONCRETE AGGREGATE.
7. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE. BUT NOT BEFORE
THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
8. SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY
DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
9. IN ORDER OF PRECEDENCE, PER SECTION 1 -04.2, SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO THIS DETAIL AND THEN
TO SECTION 8 -01.3 (9) A. WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
10. SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE SHALL BE EVALUATED AND SILT FENCE LOCATIONS SHALL BE EVALUATED AND
ADJUSTED AS DIRECTED OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY.
11. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW CONTOURS, WHERE FEASIBLE.
12. ANY DEVIATION OR CHANGE TO THIS PLAN DETAIL MUST BE APPROVED BY AN INSPECTOR FOR THE PERMITTING
AUTHORITY.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR FILTER FABRIC
ON SITE.
14. MAINTENANCE STANDARDS:
A. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY.
B. IF CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FENCE, THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTED AND CONVEYED
TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND.
C. THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE FENCE SHALL BE CHECKED FOR SIGNS OF THE SILT FENCE ACTING
AS A BARRIER TO FLOW. AND CAUSING CHANNELIZATION OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF SUCH
CHANNELIZATION OCCURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THE FENCE OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT.
D. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WHEN THE SEDIMENT IS 0.5 FT. HIGH.
E. IF THE FILTER FABRIC HAS DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN, IT SHALL BE REPLACED.
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR (8 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR I8 & SR 99.dgn
TIME 9:06:44 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y.OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE BY
REGION
NO.
10
STATE
WASH
JO8 NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BON
DATE
P.E. STAW BON
DATE
i i5 /7
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TESC DETAILS
PLOT6
TD2
s131
21
SHEETS
FENCING
MATERIAL
N•,
O
N
2 x 2 WOOD POST
STAPLE ON
TOP OF TIE
PLASTIC TIE
HIGH DENSITY \ N
POLYETHYLENE
FABRIC WITH
OPEN MESH — Z ..,
HIGH VISIBILITY
ORANGE COLOR
2 x 2 WOOD OR
STEEL T -BAR POST
TYPICAL SECTION
FENCING
MATERIAL
- 0" MIN.
ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE AREA
BOUNDARY
STEEL
T -BAR POST
PLASTIC TIE
.
.
•
•
•
.
M MM MIO OEM MIN
MI — MB I■. —M
Al I= Ii• —NM
.� — Nom:_• —MI
. = —� ■• --
.Mi, =_ Iii_ I=
. =I�UM : :. ∎=
.E = ■ IBM MI N
.M —aT. A._MI
. — u. :7 —me
--4— IBS —NM
. =!� I■. —N
. — �IEI♦: _. --
NI — = WI; I.. =1
.��I I..I=NM
v∎���`�, 'w`Vw
v
O� rn''' O0000 OOO.=... - ■
BT.i� O � _ .�� �00 I �� Bl•■nBXi BT�� ■
...•-1...'"'!"." O 0 ��m�mt 1 0o` X00 -0 — — . , —asp■
me me
O moo O � ��Os , 00000..0O .- ■■a - - -■
oo I■. L � �� ■■
O 00 1 � 0 ��000010� 0
� 1; =. 00 0 -- = O OoOO ---- I �U0�0.�
� �� I■. 00o0 00-- X0000-- 0- -�_,■•
O�..N■.0('� OOOOOOOoOOO O��MO1. MI �
O O OO�— OOOf�000�0�M. MO ■■i� NI 0 �� =te Io O'm0000000000�mAm ■= >_ el
mg me — ..... me me ■■i_am me tar
m me NAME! ms mot a
--- _4_NM E - — __M
- - -a ■ ■n___1
— ■
me -- - - - -me — ■■aMmw•
_a-- ... ■u__ma
—I--_— s a; _■ ns;_Mri
� — . ∎�■ � —� •
ow me —T um MTm - -gm •UMW m•
IMB — MI —i - - —INN ■ � MI �II
- -me ow sm ■ ■em M
A14
6' - 0" MAX.
ELEVATION
ALL
Ala PROTECTED Alt,
AREA
Alm
ALL
ISOMETRIC VIEW
WORK
AREA
VERTICAL POST
ELEVATION
FENCE ON SLOPE
• HIGH VISIBILITY
CONSTRUCTION FENCING
RECE
'FEB 141000
bEvF O roFUr
FILE NAME
TIME
S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
9:06:38 AM
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY
DESIGNED BY
ENTERED BY
k imjC
J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGICAI STATE
NO.
10 WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FEO.AID PROJ.NO.
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE DETAIL
PLOT5
TD3
SHEE
14
2 1
SHEE
NOTE:
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
S 18 M 6.4
7 / 7 '/7777 - /77
BRIDGE NO. 18/16N
1. ALL OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE
2. USE GUIDE POST SPACING OF NO MORE
IS 4 FT OR LESS FROM THE TRAVELED
BRIDGE NO. 18/16S
x/7/77
EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
THAN 40FT WHEN BEAM GUARDRAIL
WAY.
MP 6.47 (4' RT)
BEGIN BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 1
WITH D CONNECTION
BEGIN REMOVING BEAM GUARDRAIL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -1, C -3, C -5)
MP 6.49 (4' LT)
END BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
BEAM GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 4
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -1, C -2j, C -6c)
U-�Z.C./ Zell /ZEZZ /ZCLL /46,4
LEGEND
- FILL-
- I— — R -
EXISTING GUIDE POST
GUIDE POST
FILL LINE
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
- I —I— BEAM GUARDRAIL
EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
,AA PAAA,d
+WV
RIGHT OF WAY
EDGE OF LANE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
EXISTING FENCE
To21No Ro5Eo W.M.
SEE SHEET GRD1 FOR
MP 6.52 (RT)
GUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (1)
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
-------- -- --
MP 6.47 (4' LT) ______ _________ __
END BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 1
CONNECT TO THE EXISTING GUARDRAIL
END REMOVING BEAM GUARDRAIL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C-1, C -3)
DETAIL
MP 6.62 (4' RT)
END BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
BEAM GUARDRAIL TR ANSITION SECTION TYPE I
� WITH D CONNECTION
L
MP 6.47 TO MP 6.48 & R1�������m���Tn/7!/7i77jTj7j�m� REMOVING C-3, C -5)
GUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (4) /77/7y777T��T7Tm
MP 6.58 TO 6.6 ( 71
GUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (3
/71 jj77.7j17j77 /7 �
MP 6.59 (8' LT)
BEGIN BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
BEAM GUARDRAIL FLARED TERMINAL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -), C -2a, C -4b)
'7;77/ 7 i7 7 !T/j717 e7 , �/ 77 7T/ 77 i 7
/
6.62 (4' LT)
BEGIN BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
BEAM GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 1
WITH D CONNECTION
BEGIN REMOVING BEAM GUARDRAIL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -1, C -2a, C -3, C -5)
BRIDGE NO. 18 /ITS
L.w
w
Cr
CD
/1J11�/ 11 l 1J1111J11[1/1/
BRIDGE NO. 18/17N
CON
1.1.) '
� Mpy
Zc j 141
FILE NAME
S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
9:07:38 AM
TIME
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
MOM
NO.
10
STATE
WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATIe No.
'EXPIRES SEP 2620071
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
WI/
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
BEAM GUARDRAIL PLAN - SR 18
PLOT I6
GR7
SHEET
21
SHEETS
n E ?in/r�nrrTirmnTir'n rr7n/7777 m�rinrr� - n rmrrimm�r 7777/ 7777 /7rnrrmrr/M7777/7777 TIMMM "7 � ��m , ?mmn
rri n/rin/r rm
P
F
/r177/77 k
P 6.71 (4' LT)
BEGIN REMOVING BEAM GUARDRAIL
BEGIN BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 10
BEAM GUARDRAIL BULLNOSE TERMINAL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -la. C -2c. C -4f)
MP 6.72 (4' RT)
END REMOVING BEAM GUARDRAIL
END BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 10
GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 1
MP 6.73 (RT)
GUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (1)
MP 6.74 (4' RT)
BEGIN BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
BEAM GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 4
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -1. C -6c)
aa- x1111!1 /1!!!11/!1/11!! /11!!111x/. Zaa! 1/ 11/1/11L1111LLZal.1•G!LL/11!L1!! /
To21No Ro5Eo W.M.
MP 6.82 (RT)
MP 6.75 (RTI GUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (1)
GUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (1)
— _ — _ — _ ___ _= = = = -5= ___ —
MP 6.71 (LT & RT) --- --- -- - - ---
CUIDE POST TO BE REMOVED (2)
--------------------- -
----------------
- ------------------------ --------- --- --- ------ --- -----
x- -
-- - - - - -- _ - - - -- - ���u�tu��cv�/ �` i�u��/ 1` i�ui� /�`ilttt"ile�"ilr��`� -
-X- - - _ - -x -- -x X / i-21 J�11J11/1/1!!1/1!!1
� � z �� � / 1, , / 1 l 1 / 11 / 1 / 11 l 1 J 1 ! l 111 ! ! 1 / 11 l 1111 ! ! / 1 ! ! 1 / 1 1 11 /1 ! l 111 ! ! 1 x / 11 l 1 / 11 l 111 ! ! 11
NOTE:
1. ALL OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
2. USE GUIDE POST SPACING OF NO MORE THAN 40FT WHEN BEAM GUARDRAIL
IS 4 FT OR LESS FROM THE TRAVELED WAY.
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
END CONSTURCTION
SR 18 MP 6.93
Y"
RECEIvE
MP 6.93 (4' RT)
END BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
CONNECT TO THE EXISTING GUARDRAIL
REMOVING GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 4
7777/ 7777/7777'
S — _
LEGEND 'FEB 1 4 2006
T EXISTING GUIDE POST DEVEL N MOVIRMOROI,
GUIDE POST
FILL LINE
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
-1-1- BEAM GUARDRAIL
EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
RIGHT OF WAY
EDGE OF LANE
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
{Iy� HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
EXISTING FENCE
FILE NAME
TIME
S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.d9n
9:07:31 AM
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
PROJ. ENGR.
M. HASAN
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
NO.
STATE
1 0 WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
'EXPIRES SEP 21, 20071
P.E. STOP BON
DATE
P.S. STAMP BO%
DATE
l ig
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
BEAM GUARDRAIL PLAN - SR 18
PLOT 15
GR2
SHEET
2�1
SHEETS
N N
W
CC
a a 0
> N
t0
tD
LJ
J
U
I-
Q
NOTE:
0
to
LA
0
cc
U D: U
Z O
- r z
•- a a
V) O - O -
Z O W N
X W W > 2
W F 2 2 I-
0 < m 0 w w
N N Z CC W
. I- • .-. x
NI U N) t- W ut
N a N VI m
■
d 2 a X O W
2 2 W - N
1 1
1 1
:B —♦•
- 0
(.7
J V)
W CC
- .
I- N I- W
Z • 2 IX
(� K
O N x m
Z N) Z
_ N ••-. J
0 03
E.., d W a
U.) 2 CO U
CD
cc
� SR 99 �
I I + I 1
-HTCB i TCB HTCB HTCB�HTCB HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB —HTCB— HTCB— HTCBLHTCB— HTCB —HTCB j H'CB— HTCB —H
—12' (TYPICAL)
t 12'(TYPICAL) L 12' (TYPICAL)
N
_-�- - I - - I -
- HTCB - HTC HTCB - HTCB - HTCB - HTCB - HTCB HTC __Ali
N
0
0
U 7
Z
X W
• a
O
■
W 2
CL CO
\ Z
I- z I- o
J O J 0
Z
•V) CC W W
N Z W N I- W
- W .-
.. I- 2 2 K
D: U 2
- 2 a Nl - a
- U CO -. S CO
0 2 W 0 Z W
N J N ■ J
a m U CO
2 W O 2 m U
1. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS - PROTECTION AND RESTORATION
OF PROPERTY FOR WORK AREA RESTRICTIONS.
2. ALL TAPERS ARE MAX. 20:1, PER STANDARD PLAN, OR PER
MANUFACTORS RECOMMENDATION.
3. ALL OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY.
4. SEE SHEET CBD1 FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS.
L 12 (TYPICAL)
I- z
J O
• N
N W
Z W
Cr
in U m
0 x W
N
..J
0 m
a z a
W U
N)
N
D-
2
17
• a,
a,
N O
W 2
J
a Z
0
w W
> 0
0 -
J
U CO
CC V)
W J
0 <
VI
ut W
0 0
7
U
O
Z U-
4
0 W VI
2 O 2
2 I-
Nl U W W
NT Z CC W
I
v I- W VI
N 0 m
W
EL X O w
W 1- N
1 I
1 1
-1 -- -
0
U,
N
TL
0
N
O
U
U
z
O
z
N
W
D:
(Si
P
N
0-
2
NOT TO SCALE
1
O
Z
W K
� W
x I
L7 2
.. a
S m
Z W
U CO
w a
m U
SECTION 1
SR 99
SR 599 TO HOLDEN ST.
MP 23.24 - MP 25.92
i
)- - HT. HTCB
•
— HT.BTHTCB HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB —HTC3— HT CB— HT CB— H TCB�H TC
Z Z
a a
J J
a a.
0 U 0
CC D:
I- a > - a
N 0 N O
0 Z 0 0 Z
O-a v a
I- I-
W in 0 W N
0 N NO
- W - W
7 W a 7 W
U N 2 U V)
vr. HV
❑
v
0
N
SEE SHEET TE5C4 FOR DETAIL
WETLAND I
12'(TYPICAL)
SR 99
0'
r m
P
N (
a a
2
• - -1- - I -
HTCB — HTCB — HTCB — HTCB —HTCB H TCB HTCB— HTCB- HTCB— HTCB —HTCS-
L 12' (TYPICAL)
rel
tD
N
D-
2
C
U,
H
J
N
O
CO
N
O.
2
/ V)
Z W
o a
N ¢ CC
Z W O
W - U-
1- D:
D:
•-•
a
U CO m
U
S W
J W
O CO W
Z < N
W
4-
K
N
m
U,
N
0-
2
VI
J
H
Z W
O O
1.71 D: CC
Z W O
W •-• W
2
I-
1
C3 m m
U
S W
0 CO W
Z a Vf
W U
L 12' (TYPICAL)
O
N 2
Z
W -
H K
x
<
U m
I W
0 CO •
z
<
W U
LEGEND
CD GUIDE POST
WETLAND BOUNDARY
— HTC8 — HIGH TENSION -
CABLE BARRIER
-'- -I- EXISTING GUARDRAIL
_=_ =_' EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER
EXISTING CONC. BARRIER BERM TYPE 1
EXISTING IMPACT ATTENUATOR
EDGE OF LANE
- EDGE OF PAVEMENT
—
CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
AIL WETLANDS
- Hvim HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
WETLAND BUFFER
Tc I
I I
I I
I I
I
LU
z
J
U
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR IB & SR 99.dqn
TIME 10:18:41 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
REGION sun FED.AID PROJ.NO.
RO.
10 WASH
NH -0018(033)
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY .
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
LOCATION NO.
(EXPIRES SEP 2620071
P.E. STAPP BD=
DATE
RECEIV
F EB 1 4 2006
CO MMUNITY
C �LOPM�ENT
P.E. STOP BOX
DATE
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
CABLE BARRIER PLAN - SR 99
PLOT?
CB1
SHEE T
17
Y1
SHEETS
BEAM GUARDRAIL FLARED TERMINAL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN C -4b)
EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY
EDGE OF THE PAVED SHOULDER
2 0'
NOTE:
1. ALL OFFSETS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVELED LANE.
SR 18 MEDIAN DETAIL
SEE SHEET CR1 FOR LOCATION
MP 6.59 VIC.
NOT TO SCALE
GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
MEDIAN CENTER LINE
BREAKPOINT
BEGIN BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1
SEE SR 18 MEDIAN SECTION A IN THIS SHEET
$R 18 MEDIAN SECTION A
SR18 MP 6.59 TO MP 6.62
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
GRAVEL BORROW
EXISTING GUARDRAIL
—i— GUARDRAIL
— FILL— FILL LINE
EDGE OF LANE
– – EDGE OF PAVEMENT
-- — CENTERLINE OF MEDIAN
GUARDRAIL TYPE I
BREAKPOINT
EXISTING SLOPE
VARIES
0' TO 4'
2.0' EDGE OF THE PAVED SHOULDER
GRAVEL BORROW
FILL LINE. CLEARING LIMIT
EDGE OF THE TRAVELED WAY
RECEIV
'FEB 14 2006
D EV LOUNIn
E Lop
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR IB & SR 99.dgn
TIME 9:07:25 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimic
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION
NO.
STATE
10 WASH
Jet NDEBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED. AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATIeN NO.
EXPIRES SEP zt, zossl
P.E. STAMP 802
DATE
P.E. STOP 802
DATE
T
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
GUARDRAIL DETAILS - SR 18
PLOT14
GRD1
SHEET
18
y1
SHEETS
z
0
X
EDGE DF TR WAY
EDGE OF PAVED SHOULDER
EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY
HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER TRANSITION SECTION
A
— 2 SECTIONS OF W -BEAM TO HOOK CABLE TO.
BEAM GUARDRAIL
BULL NOSE
SR 99
MP 24.81 VIC.
MP 25.12 VIC.
20 MIN.
_CABLE BARRIER
HIGH TENSION CABLE BARRIER PLACEMENT FOR W -BEAM BULL NOSE
HIGH TENSION
NOTE:
1. THE BARRIER NEEDS TO BE RE- DIRECTIVE AT THE POINTS OF THE 25 DEGREE ANGLE INTERCEPT.
2. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
THAT SHALL INCLUDE THE CONNECTION TO GUARDRAIL AND THE TRANSITION AND TERMINAL SECTIONS.
3. THE DESIGN LAYOUT LINE SHALL INTERCEPT THE CABLE BARRIER AT A POINT THAT IS AT LEAST 12 FEET
(PERPENDICULAR) FROM THE OPPOSITE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY.
4. A 20:1 OR FLATTER TAPER SHALL BE USED WHEN ADJUSTING THE ALIGNMENT OF THE CABLE BARRIER.
AND IT REQUIRED WHEN THE W -BEAM GUARDRAIL FACE IS LESS THAT 12 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY.
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR I8 & SR 99.don
TIME 9:06:34 AM
DATE 2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimic
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y.OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M. HASAN
PROJ. ENCR. D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
RED3ON
NO.
STATE
10 WASH
AOB NU*ER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH- 0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
¢XPIRES SEP 24 20071
P.E. STOP BOX
DATE
P.E. STUD BOX
DATE
WAIF
Washington State
Department of Transportation
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
DE VELOPMENT
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
CABLE BARRIER DETAILS - SR 99
PLOT4
CBD1
SHEET
19
2 1
SHEETS
BUFFER DATA
BUFFER SPACE = B
SPEED (MPH)
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
LENGTH (feet)
55
85
120
170
220
280
335
415
485
PROTECTIVE VEHICLE ROLL AHEAD DISTANCE = R •
VEHICLE
TYPE
TYPICAL VEHICLE
LOADED WEIGHT
(LBS)
POSTED
SPEED
(mph)
STATIONARY
OPERATION
(feet)
600
4 YARD
DUMP TRUCK
24.000
60 -65
100
50 -55
75
45
50
2 TON
CARGO TRUCK
15,000
60 -65
150
50-55
100
45
75
ITON
CARGO TRUCK
10,000
60 -65
200
50 -55
150
45
100
ROLL AHEAD STOPPING DISTANCE ASSUMES DRY PAVEMENT.
SIGN SPACING = X (FEET)
Freeways
ays &
Freew sways 55/70 MPH
1500'+ -
(OR AS PER
MUTED)
Rural Roads 45/55 MPH
500'+ -
Urban Arterials & 35/40 MPH
Rural Roads
350'+ -
Rural Roads
Urban Streets 25/30 MPH
Residentiols &
Business Districts
200'+ -
All signs are 48'x48' block on orange
unless otherwise designated.
550
MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH (L) IN FtET
Lone
Width
(feet)
Posted Speed (mph)
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
10
105
(50
205
265
450
500
550
-
11
115
(65
225
295
495
550
605
660
12
125
180
245
320
540
600
660
720
CHANNELIZING DEVICE SPACING (FEET)
MPH
TAPER
TANGENT
50/70
40
80
35/45
30
60
25/30
20
40
P CMS
1
2
LEFT
ONE
LANE
MILE
CLOSED
AHEAD
1.5 SEC
1.5 SEC
TIME
48"
END
ROAD WORK
G20 -2A
24"
— SEE ADVANCE SIGNING FOR SHOULDER
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR I8 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR 18 & SR 99.dgn
9:07104 AM
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY J. KIM /Y.OWEIS
ENTERED BY J. KIM
CHECKED BY M.HASAN
PROJ. ENGR. D.EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM. L. ENG
REVISION
W20 -1
LEGEND
N>D SEQUENTIAL ARROW SIGN TYPE "C
11 SIGN LOCATION - TRIPOD MOUNT
TRAFFIC SAFETY DRUMS WITH LIGHT
PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN
TRUCK MOUNTED ATTENUATDR
IPCMSI
DATE
ADVANCE SIGNING FOR SHOULDER
BY_
x
REGION STATE
NO.
10
WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
W21 -5
W20 -303
x x
SR 18/ SR 99 SINGLE LEFT LANE CLOSURE
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
END
ROAD WORK
G20 -2A
24"
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
WAIF
Washington State
Department of Transportation
FIELD LOCATE 1 MILE (t) IN
ADVANCE OF LANE CLOSURE
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES
I. USE A MINIMUM OF SEVEN CHANNELIZING DEVICES IN TAPERS.
2. TRAFFIC SAFETY DRUMS SHALL BE USED ON ALL LANE CLOSURES,
LANE TAPERS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
3. USE TRANSVERSE DEVICES IN CLOSED LANE EVERY 1000 "t
4. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF ANY ONE LANE CLOSURE SHALL BE ONE
MILE. OR AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
5. DURING THE HOURS OF DARKNESS. ALL TRAFFIC SAFETY DRUMS USED ON
LANE CLOSURES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TYPE C STEADY BURNING
WARNING LIGHTS. REPLACEMENT BATTERIES FOR WARNING LIGHTS SHALL BE
INCLUDED IN THE COST OF FURNISHING THE DRUMS. TWO TRAFFIC SAFEY
DRUMS SHALL BE PROVIDED ACROSS THE CLOSED LANE APPROXIMATELY
EVERY 500 FEET.
6. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS "PROTECTION AND RESTORATION
OF PROPERTY" FOR WORK AREA RESTRICTION. RECEIVED
7. CLOSE SHOULDER IF NEEDED ON SR 18. 1 r
8. NO FLAGGERS OR SPOTTERS REQUIRED. FEB 1 4 2005
9. FOR CLASS A CONSTRUCTION SIGNING. SEE TC2.
• T11
DEVELO I ,ENT
C
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
SHEET
20
21
SHEETS
CLASS A CONSTRUCTION SIGNING
SR IS MP
SIGN CODE
SIGN DESCRIPTION
SIZE
LOCATION
6.41 (EB)
W20-I
ROAD WORK AHEAD
4' X 4'
BEGINNING OF PROJECT
6.47 (WB)
G20 -2A
END ROAD WORK
4' X 2'
BEGINNING OF PROJECT
6.93 (EB)
G20 -2A
END ROAD WORK
4' X 2'
END OF PROJECT
6.93 (WBI
W20 -I
ROAD WORK AHEAD
4' X 4'
END OF PROJECT
SR 99 HP
SIGN CODE
SIGN DESCRIPTION
SIZE
LOCATION
23.24 (NB)
W20 -I
ROAD WORK AHEAD
4' X 4'
BEGINNING OF PROJECT
23.24 (SB)
G20 -2A
END ROAD WORK
4' X 2'
BEGINNING OF PROJECT
25.92 (NB)
G20 -2A
END ROAD WORK
4'X 2'
END OF PROJECT
25.92 (SBI
W20 -I
ROAD WORK AHEAD
4' X 4'
END OF PROJECT
CHANNELIZING DEVICE SPACING (FEET)
MPH
TAPER
TANGENT
50/70
40
80
35/45
30
60
25/30
20
40
SIGN SPACING = X (FEET)
Freeways &
Expressways 55/T0 MPH
1500'+ -
(OR AS PER
MUTCM
Rural Roads 45/55 MPH
500'+ -
Urban Arterials & 35/40 MPH
Rural Roods
35O' +-
Rural Roads
Urban Streets 25/30 MPH
Residentials &
Business Districts
200'+ -
All signs are 48'x48' black on orange
unless otherwise designated.
550
MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH (L) IN FEET
Lane
Width
(feet)
Posted Speed (mph)
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
10
105
150
205
265
450
500
550
-
I1
115
165
225
295
495
550
605
660
12
125
180
245
320
540
600
660
720
BUFFER DATA
BUFFER SPACE = B
SPEED (MPH)
LENGTH (feet)
VEHICLE
TYPE
4 YARD
DUMP TRUCK
2 TON
CARGO TRUCK
I TON
CARGO TRUCK
25
55
30
85
35
120
TYPICAL VEHICLE
LOADED WEIGHT
(LBS)
24,000
15,000
10,000
40
170
45
220
POSTED
SPEED
(mph)
60 -65
50 -55
45
60 -65
50 -55
45
60 -65
50 -55
45
•
50
280
55
335
STATIONARY
OPERATION
(feet)
100
75
50
150
100
75
200
150
100
60
415
2' MIN.
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES
1. USE A MINIMUM OF SEVEN CHANNELIZING DEVICES IN TAPERS.
65
485
PROTECTIVE VEHICLE ROLL AHEAD DISTANCE = R •
ROLL AHEAD STOPPING DISTANCE ASSUMES DRY PAVEMENT.
� R
B
99
99
99
1
99
99
99
///// /'1 //I
WORK AREA
AI
0
` — 2' MIN.
100'
-){F SIGNING SEQUENCE IS THE
SAME FOR BOTH DIRECTIONS
0
L/3
0
X
X
* W21 -5
N
X
* W20 -1
N
N
q
500'
2. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF ANY ONE LANE CLOSURE SHALL BE ONE
MILE, OR AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. DURING THE HOURS OF DARKNESS, ALL TRAFFIC SAFETY DRUMS USED ON
LANE CLOSURES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TYPE C STEADY BURNING
WARNING LIGHTS. REPLACEMENT BATTERIES FOR WARNING LIGHTS SHALL BE
INCLUDED IN THE COST OF FURNISHING THE DRUMS. TWO TRAFFIC SAFEY
DRUMS SHALL BE PROVIDED ACROSS THE CLOSED LANE APPROXIMATELY
EVERY 500 FEET.
4. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS "PROTECTION AND RESTORATION
OF PROPERTY" FOR WORK AREA RESTRICTION.
5. CLOSE SHOULDER IF NEEDED ON SR 18.
6. NO FLAGGERS OR SPOTTERS REQUIRED.
MIN.
MAX.
48"
END
ROAD WORK
G20 -2A
SR 18 & SR 99 LEFT SHOULDER CLOSURE
MEDIAN WORK AREA
24°
K1
LEGEND
SIGN LOCATION - TRIPOD MOUNT
TRAFFIC SAFETY DRUMS WITH LIGHT
TRUCK MOUNTED ATTENUATOR
FILE NAME S: \412348 \SR 18 & SR 99 Median Cross Over Protection \CADD \SR IB & SR 99.dpn
TIME 9:07:10 AM
DATE
2/6/2006
PLOTTED BY kimjc
DESIGNED BY
J. KIM /Y. OWEIS
ENTERED BY
J. KIM
CHECKED BY
M. HASAN
PROJ. ENGR.
D. EDWARDS
REGIONAL ADM.
L. ENG
REVISION
DATE
BY
REGION STATE
NO.
10
WASH
JOB NUMBER
06A007
CONTRACT NO.
FED.AID PROJ.NO.
NH -0018(033)
LOCATION NO.
P.E. STAMP BOX
DATE
P.E. STOP sax
DATE
RECEIVED
FEB 14 2006
GOMMUN
nom: Or EN
AgIOL
Washington State
Department of Transportation
SR 18 & SR 99
MEDIAN CROSSOVER PROTECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
PLOT12
TC2
SHEET
21
Y1
SHEETS