Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L06-035 - HUNDTOFTE AARON - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTHUNDTOFTE BLA 3725 & 3727 S 126 (See Special Permission L06 -036) L06-035 Project File Number: Applicants: Type of Permit:: Project Description: Location: Associated Files: • cry of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Aaron Hundtofte and Brie Campbell, Applicants King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning Low Density Residential District: I. PROJECT INFORMATION L06 -036 Aaron Hundtofte and Brie Campbell Special Permission, Director Reduction in Wetland Buffer Reduce 80 -foot wide buffer for a Type 2 wetland to 40 -feet in order to construct two single family homes and associated parking. An existing driveway that is within the reduced buffer area will remain. A wetland enhancement plan has been provided for the reduced buffer area, and has been reviewed and approved with conditions by the City's Urban Environmentalist. 3725 and 3727 S. 126 Street L06 -035, Boundary Line Adjustment II. DECISION July 10, 2006 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a reduction in the wetland buffer does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to the conditions set forth below based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. CL Page 1 of 4 07/07/2006 11:48:00 AM q: \Hundtofte BLA \L06 -036 Notice of Decision.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 L06 -036, Hundtofte Sensitive Areas Departure Notice of Decisions Conditions of Approval: • • 1. In lieu of spraying herbicide to eliminate the Japanese Knotweed, the plant stems must be injected with herbicide, which is an effective control measure and minimizes potential contamination of the wetland and stream. As with any herbicide, only those approved for this use by the EPA and the State are permitted and only according to the instructions on the label. More information on control of Japanese Knotweed can be found in the document prepared by The Nature Conservancy located on the internet at: http: / /tncweeds.ucdavis. edu/moredocs /polspp01.pdf. 2. The plant list provided in the Conservation District plan must be used in lieu of the plant list provided in the Sensitive Areas Report. Plant substitution is acceptable, provided that native plants are used and the plants are appropriate for the hydrologic regime. 3. A planting plan must be provided for the wetland and buffer area. It is acceptable to provide a simple planting plan that identifies approximate zones for planting the different combinations of plants and the number of plants in each zone. 4. A report summarizing the site inspection after the plantings must be provided. There are two options for providing the City this report: either the King Conservation District staff may inspect the site or a wetland biologist or landscape professional must inspect the plantings. The report must be provided within 15 days of the inspection. 5. Annual maintenance and monitoring reports must be provided to the City for five years as discussed in the Sensitive Areas Study. 6. The performance standards as stated in the Sensitive Areas Study and Mitigation Plan are acceptable for this site: 1) 75% survival of installed plants at the end of the 5 year and 2) 60% areal coverage of tree sapling/shrub stratum. 7.A performance bond in the amount of 150% of the cost of the plant materials must be provided at the time of final City inspection of the implemented planting plan. 8.Record the wetland and buffer delineation with King County Records and Elections and provide a copy to the City. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the Planning Commission of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. CL Page 2 of 4 07/07/2006 11:48:00 AM q:\Hundtofte BLA \L06 -036 Notice of Decision.doc L06 -036, Hundtofte Sensitive Areas Departure Notice of Decisions A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision. In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by July , 2006. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. • • IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. A fee of $100.00. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. If no appeal of the Planning Commission decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3661 for further information. CL Page 3 of 4 07/07/2006 11:48:00 AM q: \Hundtofte BLA \L06 -036 Notice of Decision.doc L06 -036, Hundtofte Sensitive Areas Departure Notice of Decisions • Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Steve Lancaster, Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila DATE CL Page 4 of 4 07/07/2006 11:48:00 AM q:\Hundtofte BLA1L06 -036 Notice of Decision.doc r a(e 1" _ a 30 60 Ye 54,,u w , remains IA it. 9tPt• pp//h11nA•kh ISO 1ahBrSU ix *4 S° rjEN/.v1 Yeu a t. PLEASE NOTE: THE STREAM LOCATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP IS APPROXIMATE, AND DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL STREAM SURVEY. APPROXIMATE STREAM LOCATION WAS BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY. _LEGEND___ I�1 WETLAND WETLAND ENHANCEMENT BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PROPOSED BUFFER WITH SPUT RAIL FENCE 40 BUFFER LINE BO BUFFER LINE • SENSITIVE AREA SIGN * 1 _ TYPE q I ®® SENSITIVE AREA STUDY AND MITIGATION PLAN HUNDHOFTE PROPERTY - S 126TH STREET Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. 10" 0' LOT 2 11 ® 9 11 150' TO R. O.W. 1 2 3 4 5 f3 LOT 3 IX. BLDf, HOUSE 2 / X -14 EX. YARD EXISTING BLDG SCS HOUSE 1 ®1 S ®10" LOT 1 ®9 0" 15 ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■1■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ 4inu ■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■ •■■■ ■■■■■■ ••••••■ ■■■••••••••/_ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■A■ ■U■■■ ■■ ■■■■ ■■ I■■■■■■ /���Agi fAg �■■■ ■ ■■■� AO Alf Alf Al Af Alf III Ar Are: i ■ •■ ■1+ afI III III A Ar AO A41 Ar A, Alf Air Air Ae, U st .i. FO 7 . .t. cot PROPOSED BUFFER LINE BUFFER ENHANCEMENT 4,000 SF TYPE 2 WETLAND 7,500 SF TO BE ENHANCED SENSITIVE AREA STUDY & MITIGATION PLAN MAP HUNDHOFTE PROPERTY - S. 126TH ST. City of Tukwila, Washington Aaron Ntmdholte B Brie Campbell 3727 S. 126th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Sheet 1n Job It 05041 Drawn by A Bachman Date: March 6, 2006 I Wet/ rdResa es, /aa r ommrowen I hew. I laAratlw I wetat Oration I ra..a d NMS Ms Avenue Si. Wit. tG Emmm 0.WnNgtm NWI atarcr Phone (425) 337.3174 Fax (425) 337-3045 E-mail: mailboxlRwetlandresources.com July 7, 2006 FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Background Decision Criteria CL q: \Hundtofte BLA \L06 -036 Staff Rpt.doc • Cizy of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM • TO: Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development Steven M. Mullet, Mayor RE: L06 -036, Special Permission, Director, Request to Reduce Type 2 Wetland Buffer at 3725 and 3727 S. 126 Street Aaron Hundtofte and Brie Campell, owners of three parcels on S. 126 Street have applied for a 50% reduction in the buffer width for a Type 2 wetland on their property. The wetland, which is approximately 7,500 sq. ft in size, is associated with Riverton Creek, which flows in an open channel just to the east of their property. The portion of the wetland located on the applicant's property (7,500 sq. ft.) will be enhanced along with 4,000 sq. ft. of buffer. The site consists of three parcels, one of which is developed with a single family home and a duplex. These structures existed on site prior to the annexation of this area to the City of Tukwila. The applicants also have applied for a boundary line adjustment (L06 -035) to enlarge the parcel on which the two existing structures are located to place the majority of the wetland and locate the parking for the two existing structures on the parcel with the structures. The remaining lot lines would be re- oriented to run east -west to reconfigure the remaining two parcels. TMC 18.45.080 G. states that the Director may reduce the standard wetland buffer on a case -by- case basis subject to the following criteria. The criteria are identified in italics followed by the response. ° a) The reduced buffer area does not contain slopes over 15 %; The reduced buffer area is primarily flat with a slight slope on the western edge of the buffer. The western -most parcel contains steep slopes on the northwest portion of the parcel, outside of the buffer area. Page 1 of 4 07/07/2006 9:56:52 AM 5300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Hundtofte Special Permission I7 iFector L06 -036 Sensitive Area Departure b) The buffer reduction is not greater than 50 %; The applicant is requesting a buffer of 40 feet for a Type 2 wetland, which is a 50% reduction in the buffer for this type wetland. There is an existing driveway that runs through the proposed reduced buffer area that will remain and continue to provide access to the site from S. 126 Street. The applicants will be using Low Impact Development techniques for most of the driveway, the parking areas for the two new homes and the parking area for the existing homes to reduce . c) Additional protection to wetlands will be provided through the implementation of a buffer enhancement plan; Wetland Resources, Inc. prepared a Sensitive Area Study and Mitigation plan for the applicants in March, 2006. In addition, King Conservation District staff prepared a report, Wetland Mitigation Enhancement project, dated May, 2006, to refine the mitigation plan and provide technical assistance with the planting plan. The City's Urban Environmentalist has reviewed the SAO study, mitigation plan and Conservation District materials and visited the site to meet with the applicants. Taking both reports as a package, the proposed mitigation is acceptable to the Urban Environmentalist, with conditions that are set forth in the Recommendation section below. The implementation of the mitigation plan will result in additional protection to the wetlands and improvement to the functions and habitat value of the wetland. In addition, the applicants have received permission from an adjacent property owner to carry out mitigation off - site, which will provide additional protection to the overall wetland and benefits to the creek. d) The existing condition of the buffer is degraded. The existing wetland is degraded and dominated by Japanese Knotweed, Reed Canarygrass, Himalayan Blackberry and other invasive plants. There are some immature red alder and willow trees as well. The applicant has begun to remove the Himalayan Blackberry and suppress the Reed Canarygrass. The Urban Environmentalist has recommended a different approach applying the herbicide to the control of the Japanese Knotweed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a 50% reduction in the buffer for the Type 2 wetland and the approach for mitigation that is outlined by the King Conservation District report, including the proposed plant spacing, and the approval of a 50% reduction in the buffer for the Type 2 watercourse with the following conditions: 1. In lieu of spraying herbicide to eliminate the Japanese Knotweed, the plant stems must be injected with herbicide, which is an effective control measure and minimizes potential contamination of the wetland and stream. As with any herbicide, only those approved for this use by the EPA and the State are permitted and only according to the instructions on CL Page 2 of 4 07/07/2006 9:56:52 AM q: \Hundtofte BLA1L06 -036 Staff Rpt.doc Hundtofte Special Permission i ector ll L06 -036 Sensitive Area Departure • the label. More information on control of Japanese Knotweed can be found in the document prepared by The Nature Conservancy located on the interne at: http: / /tncweeds .ucdavis.edu /moredocs /polspp0l .pdf. 2. The plant list provided in the Conservation District plan must be used in lieu of the plant list provided in the Sensitive Areas Report. Plant substitution is acceptable, provided that native plants are used and the plants are appropriate for the hydrologic regime. 3. A planting plan must be provided for the wetland and buffer area. It is acceptable to provide a simple planting plan that identifies approximate zones for planting the different combinations of plants and the number of plants in each zone. 4. A report summarizing the site inspection after the plantings must be provided. There are two options for providing the City this report: either the King Conservation District staff may inspect the site or a wetland biologist or landscape professional must inspect the plantings. The report must be provided within 15 days of the inspection. 5. Annual maintenance and monitoring reports must be provided to the City for five years as discussed in the Sensitive Areas Study. 6. The performance standards as stated in the Sensitive Areas Study and Mitigation Plan are acceptable for this site: 1) 75% survival of installed plants at the end of the 5 year and 2) 60% areal coverage of tree sapling/shrub stratum. 7. A performance bond in the amount of 150% of the cost of the plant materials must be provided at the time of final City inspection of the implemented planting plan. 8. Record the wetland and buffer delineation with King County Records and Elections and provide a copy to the City. Attachments: • June 16, 2006 Memorandum from Sandra Whiting, Urban Environmentalist. • Sensitive Area Study and Mitigation Plan, prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. March 6, 2006. • Hundtofte /Campbell Wetland Mitigation Enhancement Project, prepared by Amy Tippery, King Conservation District, May, 2006. CL Page 3 of 4 07/07/2006 9:56:52 AM q: \Hundtofte BLA \L06 -036 Staff Rpt.doc July 26, 2006 • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Steven M Mullet, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Plann r inj RE: L06 -035, Hundtofte Boundary Line Adjustment Attached for your signature are the plan sheets for the Hundtofte boundary line adjustment. This site is also the subject of a Special Permission, Director request to reduce the buffer for a Type 2 wetland on the property, land use file L06 -036. You approved that request with conditions on July 10, 2006. The three parcels, Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Riverton Replat of a portion of Riverside Interurban Tracts, pre -date the adoption of the State subdivision law and would be subject to the recent Zoning Code definition of lot. Since the BLA applicants began their discussions with the City prior to adoption of the new lot definition and were relying on staff advice on the best way to proceed with developing the two remaining parcels, a determination was made on October 14, 2005 that the three lots would be recognized as individual lots. A copy of that determination is attached. A Memorandum indicating Public Works and Fire Department approval of the BLA is attached. The Finance Department has no issues with the BLA, per the attached e-mail. If you have any questions I can be reached at 431 -3661. Attachments q: \Carol \Iiundtofte BLA \L06 -035 Director Approval.doc Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax: (206) 433 -1833 nitlk/1(1fI i1.ewnn A?4 July 18, 2006 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Jim Morrow, via Jill Mosqueda Nick Olivas, via Don Tomaso FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planne� MEMORANDUM RE: L06 -035, Hundtofte Boundary Line Adjustment The above referenced boundary line adjustment is ready for approval. The project has been reviewed previously by your Department. Attached is the Boundary Line Adjustment legal description and survey. Please review these materials and indicate your approval by signing or initialing below. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Thanks very much. If you have any questions, please call me at 431 -3661. I am out of the office July 19 -25; if you have questions during that time, please contact Nora Gierloff at 433 -7141. Approved by Jim Morrow, Director Department of Public Works Approved by Chief Nick Olivas Tukwila Fire Department CL Attachments: Boundary Line Adjustment Sheets Drainage and Private Access Road Maintenance Covenant Page I of I 0748/2006 11:50:00 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 = 431 -3665 June 30, 2006 Mr. Aaron Hundtofte and Ms. Brie Campbell 3725 S. 126 Street Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: L06 -035, Boundary Line Adjustment for parcels 7345660 -0690, -0695 and -0696 Dear Aaron and Brie: We have completed review of your boundary line adjustment (BLA) and are ready to proceed to final approval. I have enclosed one of the BLA sets with several notations or corrections that need to be made to the BLA. In addition: 1. Record the ingress /egress easement and note that recording number on the BLA sheet. If you prefer, you may leave a blank on the BLA sheet for the recording number and record the easement just before recording the BLA and write in the recording number of the easement at that time. 2. If the ingress /egress easement will be used for locating the utilities you should revise the wording of the easement to read "An ingress, egress and utility easement...." The underlined language should be added to the legal descriptions for lots A, B and C as well. 3. I did not see a maintenance agreement for the road or the storm water facilities — you may want to record a maintenance covenant to make sure the costs of maintaining these facilities are shared among the 3 lots. I am enclosing sample language for a drainage and private road maintenance covenant that you can revise to fit your situation if you wish, or your surveyor may have language to use. You should make note of the covenant's recording number on the face of the BLA and reference it in the legal descriptions. Again, you can record the agreement before giving the revisions to your surveyor and have him include the recording number on the BLA or record just before you record the BLA and just write in the agreement recording number. 4. For lot C, please indicate the square footage for the lot with and without the road easement. The other lots are ok as shown. 5. Complete the Declaration section and have your signatures notarized by a Notary Public. There are several here at the City that you may use if you prefer. 6. Provide one BLA set with an original signature from your surveyor. CL q: \Hundtofte BLA \Hundtofte l .doc • Cizy of Tukwila • Page 1 of 2 06/30/2006 4:21:00 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Aaron Hundtofte and Brie Campbell BLA for parcels 7345660 -0690, -0695 and -0696 June 30, 2006 As part of the Special Permission Director decision, you will be required to record the location of the wetland and buffer on the property, so you may want to add this information to the boundary line adjustment map so you don't have to make a separate trip to record this information. When you have the corrections made to the BLA sheets, please return a clean set to me for signature by the Department Director. Please do not fold the sheets, but rather roll them, as the ink sometimes comes off in the folded areas, which creates problems for King County. Let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Manager Jill Mosqueda, Engineer, Public Works Dept. CL Page 2 of 2 06/30/2006 4:21:00 PM q:\Hundtofte BLA\Hundtoftel.doc 1188 S 3ER wner(s) in fee simple of the land mt. The undersigned further declare tion of said boundary line adjustment once with the desire of the owner(s). and foregoing instrument and ntary act and deed for the 20 and foregoing instrument voluntary act and of , 20 registered as a land surveyor n an actual survey of the land m; that the distances, courses its other than those monuments omens staked on the ground f the City of Tukwila this , at minutes past M, and OLD DESCRIPTION LOTS 5, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. NEW DESCRIPTION LOT "A" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; ALL OF LOT 5, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 27.57 FEET OF LOT 6, BLOCK 9 RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH AO INGRESS, EGRESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. LOT "B" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. THE SOUTH 96.75 FEET OF LOTS 6 AND 7, EXCEPT THE EAST 27.57 FEET, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER AND SUBJECT TO At$INGRESS, EGRESSA.EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. pMp uhiAlAiN LOT "C" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, ALL OF LOTS 6 AND 7 EXCEPT THE THE SOUTH 96.75 FEET AND THE EAST 27.57 FEET, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER AND SUBJECT TO A INGRESS, EGRESS DESCRIBED BELOW. A'INGRESS, EGRESS�EASEMENT, FOR LOTS A,B & C DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMM NCING AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THENCE N 89.18'57" W, A DISTANCE OF 92.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S 00.41'03" W, A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET, TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 23.79 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.79 FEET THOUGHT A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ",TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT WITH SAID CURVE, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET, THENCE S 00.41'03" W, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE N 89.18'57" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET, THENCE N 00.41'03" E, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET, TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE • NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 FEET, THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 16.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 30.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, THENCE N 00.41'03" E A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS ON THE SOUTH MARGIN LINE OF SOUTH 126TH STREET, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. OWNER(S): AARON HUNDTOSTE & BRIE CAMPBELL ADDRESS: 3725 SOUTH 126TH STREET APPROVALS KING COUNTY FINS I certify that all pros taxes for the follow delinquent special any of the property This King County Treasi KING COUNTY ASS Examined and appr day of King County yr Parcel Number(s)_ TUKWILA SHORT Reviewed and appr this Chairperson, Short BT SUR' 3188 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L 0&-035 5 c PROPERTY L OLD PL, MEAS. 49.93 (R.O u7 N N 15' INGRESS EGRESS ESM'T u7 N c0 rn i0' N8918'57 "W 149.80 MEAS. JV R 0.S. 150 .VV PLAT 00 PLAT NEW LOT " C " ,911 SQ. FEET 0.20 ACRES 1 O& 2 SR.?cer tokh t Ratca+c�,a" ik OLD (Lot 7) C6 N89 °18'57 "W NEW PROPERT NEW LOT "B" 6.995 SQ. FEET 0.16 ACRES S. 126th St. Ne S.) O O O N N LUJ z J F- 0 CC 0 0 J O L6 to J INGRESS W EGRESS EASEMENT L4 ° O O z 5. O N N L11.1 N) O ° 0 z 1 \ . NEW PR ERTY LINE 77.50 49.93 (R.O.S.) O 0 O N N (Lot 6) Lv z J - L2 CC Lv a_ 0 0 LIJ z 0 0 OLD 2.3 — NEW NEW 29.3 ADDRESS: 3725 S. 126TH STREET OLD PL, MEAS. 49.93 (R.O.S.) 92.00 NEW LOT "A" 17,050 SQ. FEET 0.39 ACRES OLD (Lot 5) House —OLD 1.7 House Lot 18 OWNER(S): AARON HUNDTOSTE & BRIE CAMPBELL Q 0 0 O N OLD 1.9 NEW PROPERTY LINE 72.30 NEW PkQPERTY LINE 77.50 i N8918 57 W 149.80 MEAS. (R.O.S.) I 150.00 PLAT Lot 16 Lot 17 Lot 1 Lot 2 gook 9 r \v ef t. o Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 19 • I BT SUR\ From: Richard Takechi To: Carol Lumb Date: 6/29/06 12:34PM Subject: Re: Hundtofte BLA • Hello Carol. Thank you for the Burns letter. What a mess! Anyway, there's nothing owing at this time for the Hundtofte BLA. The 2nd half billing will be going out next month. »> Carol Lumb 06/29/06 11:17AM »> Hi Richard: I think I forgot to route this BLA to you for review - it involves parcels 734560 -0695 and 734560 -0696. They are just adjusting the parcel lines so they have more logical building sites. Any financial issues with the parcels. On the Burns Estate BLA, I call Robert Wade yesterday and also sent him a letter. I just realized I should have cc'd you on the letter, so I will attach it below for your info and reading enjoyment. Let me know if you need a copy of the signed letter on letterhead. & I'll put it in interoffice mail to you. It sounds like Mr. Wade has some documentation that goes back to the original plat, so hopefully this will get settled soon. It sure is confusing to me what's happened up there with parcel lines! I'm glad I'm not the surveyor trying to figure things out. Go Mariners!! Carol July 15, 2006 Re: BLA Corrections Morning Carol, Hope you had a lovely weekend. • • We are, as you know, out of town. However, we have put together a package including all requisite corrections for your review. This package includes: 1.) The revised wording of the ingress /egress /utility easement as well as including the words utility on the legal descriptions of lots A, B & C. 2.) The total square footage for lot C with and without the easement. 3.) The location of the wetland and buffer on the property included in the Boundary Line Adjustment Map. 4.) A drainage and private access road maintenance covenant. 5.) A BLA set with an original signature from our surveyor including a completed Declaration section with our signatures notarized by a Notary Public. Hope this package finds you well and looking forward to your time away. If you have any further questions or comments please send us an email. Look forward to this all moving ahead. Sincerely, Aaron and Brie SSAGE FOR: FROM: o,ANbt.-- d. tn, e€ DATE: - 112.110c, ow OF: TIME: 3', MESSAGE: .9 ULLa bet yr -e./2 - 141V has, v, &La p tie- -gyp 0-ohow ot...look PHONE ( ) SO - 5535' EXT: FAX ( ) - BY: Private Road Description: • • Drainage and Private Access Road Maintenance Covenant This covenant is executed to provide for the repair and maintenance of the private access road and drainage system within the property described below for the continued use and benefit by the owners thereof, as described below. In addition the subject private access road will remain open at all times for emergency vehicles. This covenant shall run with the land for as long as the private road and drainage system is used to serve the lots described below. Owners: The owners, Aaron Hundtofte and Brie Campbell, Lots A, B & C of the City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment # L06 -035, for the private access road and drainage system within said City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment. AN INGRESS. EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT, FOR LOTS A,B & C DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THENCE N 89.18'57" W. A DISTANCE OF 92.00 FEET, TO NE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S 00.41'03" W. A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET, TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 23.79 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46. TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO NE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.79 FEET NOUGHT A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46. TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO NE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ",TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT WITH SAID CURVE, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET, THENCE S 00.41'03' W, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE N 89.18'57" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET, THENCE N 00.41'03 E, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET. TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO NE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 FEET, THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ". TO A BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 16.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 30.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, THENCE N 00.41'03" E A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS ON NE SOUTH MARGIN UNE OF SOUTH 126TH STREET, THENCE S 89.18'57' E. A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. The private drainage system shall be maintained in an operable and efficient condition consistent with the 1998 King County surface water design manual or its successor document. The private access road shall be maintained as an operable asphalt surfaced road. Where any question exists as to the standards to be applied, the owners may obtain a recommendation from the City of Tukwila or its successor agency and/or a licensed engineer. A minimum 60% majority of the owners may initiate an improvement or repair action. All owners shall share all associated costs on an equal basis, with no fees allowed for administration by one or more of the owners. All funds shall be due at the time that the work is billed by the respective contractor or professional. Independent payment schedules may be used if agreed upon by the majority of owners. In the event that funds are not paid when due, the aggrieved owner(s) may initiate an action to collect the funds and shall be entitled to costs and a reasonable attorney's fee upon recovery. This covenant shall be binding upon all owners, their heirs, successors or assigns. In the event that the property changes hands, the new owner shall be responsible for all past due charges outstanding against the lot at the time of transfer. County of King On this t 9'k day of • • 5i , 2006 before me, the undersigned a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, dul ,cpmr i ne d and sworn, personally appeared 13 .CAr'n 4ip�' Limn {< } - r � c u H - to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that �� signed the same as a free and voluntary act and deed, for the use and purposes therein mentioned. 3,11.0 c i er: Date 6 . fttkni i 0 FiC Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. 0 t h t I I I 1i,/ \ \ 4Z'; •• '" ;OTARy. • My Comm. Expires February 2, 2009 _ (PA : No. 107024 1 Z O : ",/; 0,e: • U • 0 `'O ,� : ; , ' wA5 1 + \ 'i NpStary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at 664'110 r W/i" COMMISSION EXPIRES A ; bliCe • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 MEMORANDUM DM. 6 k ilo ( LU LAk) TE. BJECT: ‘r IL' - * 1-11.- Q4A (-tote A. .ts yji I- e. - vv-ekJ( ' 1 h Ls VLO r il) &ii1/0-0(A(Nit f>"0 (4"1-1-L OurNa,ik ar 6 . ] &r , on. iLgt, Ave r oNiai o g- kl,..) 1 6L4 - lur 44 //VAX LV .444 1 6 49 6 1-1•41 CkNak_. W 4W kli 1A-46Ar LAAVAL . 44 VAM, W M. to ieteJcs 0 C-- (- , AkkA ex) aes. rettue-4-v4;,, . .0/k•46tt Sa1,5 t y , itrc..- 44..0, cion ue st-P k s , t-o . n4 &how uf- kat,44. — 9 U,L1 co CITY OF TUKW LA NOTICE OF APPLICATION Aaron Hundtofte has filed a Special Permission, Director application to reduce the wetland buffer for a Type 2 wetland on property located at 3727 S. 126th Street, Tukwila Permits applied for include: L06-036, Special Permission, Director; L06 -035, Boundary Line Adjustment Other known required permits include: public works permit for site work; building permits for new homes Studies required with the applications include:< Sensitive Area Study and Mitigation Plan prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. dated March 6, 2006; Wetland Mitigation Enhancement Project, prepared by Amy Tippery, King Conservation District; Storm Water Technical Information Report, prepared by TLP Pacific, LLC. An environmental checklist is not required for this project. FILES AVAILABLE FOR, 'PUBLIC ,REVIEW :. The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Please call ahead to 206 -431 -3661 to assure the availability of the files. Project Files include: L06-036, Special Permission, Director; L06-035, Boundary Line Adjustment OPPORTUNITY :FOROUBLI6 COMMENT` Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Wednesday, July 5, 2006. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The decision on the boundary line adjustment may be appealed to the City of Tukwila Hearing Examiner; the Special Permission Director decision may be appealed to the Tukwila Planning Commission. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at (206) 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: May 15, 2006 Notice of Completeness Issued: May 22, 2006 Notice of Application Issued: June 21, 2006 CL Page 1 of 1 q:Uiundtofte\NOA.doc 06/20/2006 4:35:00 PM Project: �vt`C%-0 e A Address: 3'12 5 a 312' 6. lit 121, St Date transmitted: 5- I Response requested by: (' - 1 - 0 G Staff coordinator: LGt ✓0 1 Date response received: Plan check date: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Comments prepared by: Update date: File Number Lob- 0U gLA. - o 36 s pecu6.4 {We S'° Avei -or (3)ffe V..oadc LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM lamed rA TO Building L' 'Public Works "Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. MEMORANDUM June 16, 2006 To: Carol From: Sandra • Re: Hundtofte BLA, L06- 035/L06 -036, Comments on Wetland/Stream Buffer Mitigation Plans I visited the site on June 15 to confirm the wetland boundaries. The wetland flags are no longer in place, so I could only go on the basis of the drawing provided by the applicant, which shows that the boundary was determined to follow the edge of the toe of the slope that faces east. I agree that these boundaries appear to be correct as shown on the site plan. The applicant has made significant progress on removal of invasive species and planting of native plants both in the buffer and in the wetland adjacent to Riverton Creek. The applicant received permission from one of the adjacent property owners to carry out mitigation on the off -site portion of the wetland. I have the following comments on the " Sensitive Area Study and Mitigation Plan" prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc., dated March 6, 2006; and the Wetland Mitigation Enhancement Project, prepared by the King Conservation District, dated May, 2006. Despite problems in the quality of the Sensitive Area Study and Mitigation Plan, the whole package presented for the wetland and buffer enhancement approach is adequate, with the King Conservation District report as a complement. The approach for mitigation that is outlined by the King Conservation District is acceptable, including the proposed plant spacing, with the following qualifications. 1. In lieu of spraying herbicide to eliminate the Japanese Knotweed, it is recommended that the plant stems be injected with herbicide. This has been shown to be an effective control measure and minimizes potential contamination of the wetland and stream. As with any herbicide, only those approved for this use by the EPA and the State are permitted and only according to the instructions on the label. More information on control of Japanese Knotweed can be found in the document prepared by The Nature Conservancy located on the internet at: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs/polsppOl.pdf. 2. Using cardboard or other barrier material for Reed Canarygrass control, and then delaying planting until the grass has been killed is a logical approach. I recommended in a prior conversation with the applicant to start this control as soon as possible, and in fact, observed during the site visit that it has already been started. 3. The plant list provided in the Conservation District plan is preferred over that provided in the Sensitive Areas Report. It is important to have an herbaceous layer, which the Sensitive Areas Report lacks. Also, many of the plants recommended by the Conservation District, in addition to being valuable for habitat purposes, are also very ornamental, which would be an additional aesthetic benefit to the proposed development and would hopefully contribute to the appreciation of the wetland and wetland buffer by the future homeowners. Plant substitution is acceptable, provided that native plants are used and the plants are appropriate for the hydrologic regime. • • 4. To make it easier for the applicant to carry out plant installation, a simple planting plan is recommended (perhaps by the Conservation District). It does not need to show the exact locations of each plant, but rather it should indicate approximate zones for planting the different combinations of plants. 5. It is our understanding that the King Conservation District will visit the site in the late fall after much of the weed control and planting have been done. If this is the case, hiring a wetland biologist or landscape professional to inspect the plantings would not be necessary in my opinion, but the City should get a copy of any report prepared by the Conservation District. The City could also inspect the site after the majority of weed control and planting have been done and again after all planting has been completed. 6. If the applicant is willing to provide annual maintenance and monitoring reports to the City, as discussed in the Sensitive Areas Study, it should not be necessary to hire a professional to do so. The City could inspect periodically to verify the conditions described in the reports. 7. The performance standards as stated in the Sensitive Areas Study and Mitigation Plan are acceptable for this site: 1) 75% survival of installed plants at the end of the 5 year and 2) 60% areal coverage of tree sapling/shrub stratum. Project: �Wr•ck $LA Address: Si 2.6 ' 312'' S. 121 St, Date transmitted: 5- 1 Response requested by: & - I — OG Staff coordinator: La ✓o) Date response received: Pto Plan check date: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 10.4 119 TO: J Building i'_'�Plannin Public Works Comments prepared by: `Fire Dept. • File Number LOS,- 035 ex `O G - 0 36 5peu64 A. 1 o-+ bvcair frvf -er LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Police Dept. ,=' Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Project: KOrNM cf. e SL Update date: Address: 3'I 2 5 a 312' S. IV St, Date transmitted: 5- 1 Response requested by: Date response received: (r - 1 — OG — Staff coordinator: Ga ✓Jl Plan check - .),` - /-of. Comments / prepared by: Als,,, . 1 Update date: TO: B u B uilding • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L06- 035 &A, `0 G - 016 5 peuwl ilketni biu?a' r3Offe Roduc LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Sand /A Planning Y!Public Works [Mt Fire Dept. r Police Dept. Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. /I6 /. S4e_ is COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) May 22, 2006 Mr. Aaron Hundtofte 3727 S. 126 Street Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: L06 -035 Hundtofte Boundary Line Adjustment, and L06 -036 Special Permission Director Applications Dear Aaron: Your applications for a boundary line adjustment and Special Permission Director for a reduction in sensitive area buffer located at 3727 S. 126 Street have been found to be complete on May 22, 2006 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. I will be the planner for these two project files. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. The applications have been circulated to the City's Urban Environmentalist, and the Fire and Public Works Departments for review. I expect comments back within 3 weeks and will be in touch with you if there are any questions or comments about the two applications. If you have any questions in the meantime, please feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, 6 Carol Lumb Senior Planner CL q: \Hundtofte BLA \Complete.doc • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director cc: Reviewing City Departments I NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Page 1 of 1 05/22/2006 2:14 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 From: Carol Lumb To: Matt Wasse Date: 3/9/06 8:47AM Subject: Re: Zoning conversation Matt: your summary accurately reflects our conversation yesterday. Let me know if you have other questions. Carol • • »> "Matt Wasse" <mattwasse @hotmail.com> 03/08/06 05:19PM »> This email is a record of the phone conversation between Matt Wasse and Carol Lumb on March 08, 2006 at 4:00 pm. The conversation was in regards to zoning restrictions in sensitive areas for the proposed development at 3725 S. 126th Street. 1. With recommendations from a geotechnical report it is acceptable to build on the slope beyond the 10' buffer setback and at the point where the south end of the existing driveway comes out of the 40' wetlands buffer. 2. The parking area serving Lot 3 can be included in the minimum lot size calculation for Lot 2. 3. The driveway will be deducted from the minimum lot size calculations for both Lots 1 &2. This is my record of the conversation, please inform me of any omissions or discrepancies. Regards, Matthew Wasse 206.661.3988 From: Carol Lumb To: Matt Wasse Date: 3/1/06 3:14PM Subject: Re: S 126th • • Hi Matt: We reviewed the new proposed structure and lot lay out - it looks like it works, as it keeps House 1 out of the steep slope sensitive area and the 40 -foot buffer area and 10 -foot building setback area. Thank you for identifying the buffer areas on the site plan - it helps when reviewing the proposed development. I wasn't able to tell if Lot 2 met the 6,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size. It looks like you could move House 1 a little more toward the street if you need more square footage for lot 2. When Brie and Aaron submit for their Special Permission Director request to reduce the buffer for the wetland, please include a copy of the proposed structure layout with the materials. I'm glad you were able to site the second new house so that you don't need the turn around for emergency response vehicles. Let me know if you have any other questions. Carol »> "Matt Wasse" <mattwasse(hotmail.com> 02/28/06 12:28PM »> Hi Carol, Here is a preliminary site plan with the first house placed at the midpoint of where the existing driveway comes out of the buffer. Let me know if you think this looks feasible. We are also considering a PRD which would greatly help mitigate the size of Lot 2 which is constrained by the exiting apartments and the house on Lot 1. This layout goes far in satisfying the fire department's requirements as well while not having to pave a large area for a truck turnaround. Thanks for taking a look, and let me know. Matt Wasse 206.661.3988 • • From: "Matt Wasse" <mattwasse @hotmail.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 2/28/06 12:29PM Subject: S 126th Hi Carol, Here is a preliminary site plan with the first house placed at the midpoint of where the existing driveway comes out of the buffer. Let me know if you think this looks feasible. We are also considering a PRD which would greatly help mitigate the size of Lot 2 which is constrained by the exiting apartments and the house on Lot 1. This layout goes far in satisfying the fire department's requirements as well while not having to pave a large area for a truck turnaround. Thanks for taking a look, and let me know. Matt Wasse 206.661.3988 CC: <brieaaron@comcast.net> • P LOT 2 SITE PLAN vie- = r-o r\ o s HOUSE 2 tcr s HOUSE I LOT I 2(Y oPoVE Attention: Carol Lumb Company: Fax Number: 206 431 - 3665 Voice Number: From: Matthew Wasse Company: Fax Number: 206 297 6290 Voice Number: 206.661.3988 Subject: 3727 S 126th St Comments: • • City of Tukwila Building Department Date: 2/3/2006 Number of Pages: 2 iliajoic 0.:( 9/ 0 Ce � G-. f O i 4,r Carol, I've sent a partial site plan of Aaron and Brie's property with the setbacks of the front two parcels. I'd like to ask if you would consider reversing the setbacks for lot #2 so that we may minimize the excavtion for the parking stalls. One of the goals of this project is to minmize the impact of the development and putting the rear yards back to back will decrease the amount dirt we'll need to move around as well as giving lot #2 a more useable yard facing south. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Matt Wasse 206.661.3988 rl way, rCi a UCH y V.), LVVV I I .GY ruvI SITE PLAN V16' = r -o• 5500' • wiouuvVII ••a .7w cvv cv. vcvv 5500' 5500' 55.00' • 8 si Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax: (206) 431 -3665 To: Fax: Phone: Re: ❑ Urgent •Comments: 9 -7 r 13(- N,4gk1tr `tACSe From: ✓.0 •0(p -- .2A 'Cr3.2 1O Date: V (1 'MCP " 4(9( )°( FY Pages: Z 3P q - -( r) a dbs — , /ext one • vaeo s-ir ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle 7 ,;:x.,..(AA.,4,4._ erA 1 )4),m r=41___N )-46.17 vre_ 6%,.• .A 7-1) Sexbactil. 1 0 GTON SET . 11/1 7/2005 4:9 26. 16 N Stlei 8'57' W t 0 4 3-5 3 5 . r of Paving of A.phc:t T S. 126th St. i49.70' MEK9. 150.00' PIM Fr itA-• 4 -0- 20 , r 14940' 9 1 3" k 2-5 i - (0 34.20'. - 9 17; 449' 1 iri - Lot le 4 • 414 1 N N 11, 10 48.20' S ar te'ST E 4 1-69 E 2 ° N 8 W • „O. / et 5 N 89 W 148.79 A467. 1..3.00 PVT L ot 17 143,80' .. 2-14e SADDER RNARD ---..---____ N 8918'57' w to 174.99 ■ 91 ,_,..........—,.. .... — -1,--- Found Bross Di& \ W/Punch In Conc. 2/23/D5 in Cana 4, z; (45 \ ; Lot 1 S Wetland $ 4' 7,7,5 oo.ft. Lot 5 0 :enc. Pod for P�.4. q 3 cia 4.11V - Lot ie \ f r, A-1'-10 .fi..-.-A. 4 a I' ' A • . _ .1:;.: -2: 17 ! , 1 r r. gg 2 y 1.I•ND ..■■■ Lot 2 1•■• own.. e■0 9 FtW e ' rVZ'rl Lot 3 Lot 4 Lit Gooav -c-he +M adIrsAevit- {/1\--4/ t.le"614,tto -c-.41/ I- Z Lot 19 PAGE 01 ueSUay, JCUIUGIy I f, LUUU'LLU rm Attention: Brandon Miles Company: Tukwila Fax Number: 206 - 431 - 3665 Voice Number: From: Matthew Wasse Company: Fax Number: 206 297 6290 Voice Number: Subject: Setbacks for Shortplat Comments: I VIOL I IGYV V V 00JG LVV LV I vLVv • • Date: 1/17/2006 Number of Pages: 2 r•" October 14, 2005 TO: Steve Lancaster, Director a / FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planrie -_ RE: Property at 3725 S. 126 Street Since March of this year, I have been meeting and talking on the telephone off and on with Brie Campbell and Aaron Hundtofte, who live at the above •address. They own property that comprises 3 parcels, Lots 5, 6, and 7 of Riverton Replat of a portion of Riverside Interurban Tracts. This is a pre -1937 plat, and therefore subject to the recent Zoning Code definition of lot and substandard lot. The three parcels total approximately 33,000 square feet, however the site is constrained by slopes that range over the northern half of the site and a Type 2 wetland and buffer in the northeast corner of the property. See attached survey of the site. The discussions with Mr. Hundtofte and Ms. Campbell have ranged over a variety of topics — possible Boundary Line Adjustment to the parcels, possible short plat, use of Low Impact Development techniques to replace the gravel driveway with a more permanent surface and the requirements for a both a wetland delineation study and a buffer reduction request. Mr. Hundtofte and Ms. Campbell stated their goal was to have just 3 lots, but to rearrange the lot line orientation. At the time this discussion took place (mid - Spring) City staff's advice was that the most appropriate tool for changing the property lines on the overall site was the BLA process. Relying in this advice, Mr. Hundtofte and Ms. Campbell have had a survey prepared for a proposed BLA. The most recent contact with them involved their submission of a draft survey for a proposed BLA of the three parcels on October 5, 2005. Given the advice from staff to Mr. Hundtofte and Ms. Campbell over the past seven months, staff is requesting a determination from you that they may proceed with utilizing the BLA process to revise the location of the property lines on their three parcels. If you concur, please sign below. CL q: \General \I Iundtofte2.doc City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Steve Lancaster, Director Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM • Date Page I of 1 10/14 /2005 9:04 AM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 From: <brieaaron @comcast.net> To: Carol Lumb <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 8/3/05 10:45AM Subject: Just a wee note Hello Carol, Just a wee note to let you know that Brie and I are still working on the mitigation plan for 3725 S. 126th street. The hang up is finding an engineer willing /able to produce a Low Impact Development proposal for our 'little' project. The larger engineering companies feel that the area is too small for them to consider. We did get one quote from Tarelle Osborne for just under $3,000. Ideally though we'd like to find someone who is experienced with LID practice. So, we are still looking. I have cleared out most of the weeds by hand and the property really looks much cleaner. Trust all is well and hopefully you'll hear from us again soon. Regards, Aaron and Brie • • • • TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Parcel # 7345600690, -695, -696 3725 S. 126 Street Tukwila, WA 98168 PREPARED FOR Aaron Hundtofte & Brie Campbell 3725 S. 126 Street Tukwila, WA 98168 ENI ,6721 ,.F 36425. • - 4 4 vole EXPIRES 1/25/9' May 9, 2006 By TLP Pacific, LLC 10512 NE 68 Street # 101 Kirkland, Washington 98033 TLP Job No. 0604 RECEIVED 'MAY 15 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Technical Information Report A. Core and Special Requirement Analysis B. Storm Drainage Calculations I. Project Overview II. Preliminary Conditions Summary III. Off -site Analysis IV. Proposed Drainage Improvements V. Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design VI. Erosion /Sedimentation Control Design VII. Bond Quantity Worksheet VIII. Operations and Maintenance Manual (TO BE SUPPLIED AT FINAL TIR) IX. Appendix • A. CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS This section of the Technical Information Report (TIR) is intended to meet agency specific requirements for a report addressing all Core and Special Requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Manual and 2005 King County Surface Water Manual. Core Requirement 1. Discharge at the Natural Location The current two houses discharge the storm runoff from the existing roofs via splash blocks. Current drainage is from southwest to the northeast. The current site condition slopes to the northeast approximately 2 percent for approximately 192 feet, then approximately 29 percent for approximately 34 feet, then approximately 4 percent for approximately 97 feet to the northeast corner of the site. The site indirectly discharges to Riverton Creek. See attached Sensitive Area Study and Mitigation Report. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained for the proposed development. Core Requirement 2. Offsite Analysis This project is EXEMPT to offsite Analysis since the proposed development will add less than 2,000 square feet of new impervious surface, and less than 35,000 square feet of new pervious surface. Core Requirement 3: Flow Control Level Two Flow Control This project is EXEMPT from Flow control since the proposed development will add less than 2,000 square feet of new impervious surface, redevelopment area is less then 5,000 square feet of new plus replaced impervious surface and less than 35,000 square feet of new pervious surface. This project is EXEMPT from Flow control since no more than 0.1 -cfs difference in the sum of the developed 100 -year peak flows and the existing peak flows. Only grassed modular grid pavement was used for sizing credits for the proposed parking area. This area was modeled in KCRTS as grassed area Existing (Pre - developed) Site Hydrology: The following table lists the existing site conditions used in the modeling software KCRTS. Till Forest 0.0 Till Grass 0.55 Wetland 0.0 Impervious 0.21 Total Area 0.76 Till Forest 0.18 Till Grass 0.0 Wetland 0.0 Impervious 0.58 Total Area 0.76 SeaTac Scale factor 1.0 Description Site Proposed (Developed) Site Hydrology: The following table lists the proposed site conditions used in the modeling software KCRTS. SeaTac Scale factor 1.0 Description Site Core Requirement 4: Conveyance System Conveyance analysis was performed using the 100 -year design storm for all pipes conveying stormwater form the proposed roof downspouts. Downspouts will be sized per the Uniform Plumbing Code. Core Requirement 5: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Erosion Control Systems are required. The site is not in a P suffix Zone. Specific ESC systems are recommended in Section IX of the TIR. A separate ESC plan is prepared for the Construction Document Phase. The ESC plan shall meet all applicable codes. Core Requirement 8: Water Quality Core Requirement 7: Financial Guarantees and Liability Financial guarantees will be required. The City of Tukwila Bond Quantity worksheet will be provided for public and private improvements after sufficient city review to establish design specifics. This project is EXEMPT from Water Quality measures since the proposed development will add less than 5,000 square feet of new PGIS that is not fully dispersed, less than 5,000 square feet of new plus replaced that is not fully dispersed and area is less then 5,000 square feet of new plus • • replaced impervious surface and less than 35,000 square feet of new PGIS that is not fully dispersed. Special Requirement #1: Other adopted area - specific requirements. None. Special Requirement #2: Flood Hazard Area Delineation The project does not contain nor is adjacent to a significant stream, lake, or closed depression. Therefore, this requirement does apply to the site. Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities Not Applicable. Special Requirement #4: Source Controls The site is not a commercial project. Therefore, this requirement does not apply to the site. B. STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ENGINEER DEVELOPER Name Todd A. Popelka Name Brie Campbell Firm TLP Pacific, LLC Firm Address 17624 NE 30 Place Address 3725 -126 Street Redmond, WA 98052 Tukwila, WA 98168 Phone Phone 206 - 396 -8449 STORMWATER FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET Development 3725 -126 Street. Location Tuckwilla, WA Developed Site: Acres 0.75 Number of lots 3 Number of detention facilities on site: Number of infiltration facilities on site: ponds ponds vaults vaults tanks Trench Flow control provided in regional facility (give location) No flow control required 0 Exemption number Downstream Drainage Basins Basin A Basin B Basin C Basin D Immediate Major Basin 0.75 Number & type of water quality facilities on site: biofiltration swale (regular /wet/ or continuous inflow ?) combined detention/WQ pond large ?) KING c Y, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATI1SIGN MANUAL Date 5 -10 -06 (WQ portion basic or large ?) combined detention/wetvault stormwater wetland compost filter wetpond (basic or large ?) X filter strip wetvault X flow dispersion farm management plan landscape management plan oil /water separator (baffle or coalescing plate ?) catch basin inserts: Manufacturer 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 1 sand filter (basic or large ?) sand filter, linear (basic or large ?) sand filter vault (basic or DESIGN INFORMATION INDIVIDUAL BASIN A B C D Water Quality design flow 0.0 CFS Water Quality treated volume or wetpond Vr pre- settling pond pre- settling structure: Manufacturer 9/1/98 KING COUNTY•HINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIjANUAL flow - splitter catchbasin 7 1998 Surface Water Design Manual DESIGN INFORMATION, cont'd TOTAL INDIVIDUAL BASIN Drainage basin(s) Onsite area A B C D 0.75 Offsite area N/A Type of Storage Facility Live Storage Volume Predeveloped Runoff Rate 2 -year 0.053 cfs 10 -year 0.073 cfs 100 -year 0.127 cfs Developed runoff rate 2 -year 0.078 cfs 10 -year 100 -year 0.105 cfs 0.215 cfs Type of restrictor Size of orifice /restriction No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 KING COY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATISIGN MANUAL FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET SKETCH All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a sketch per the following criteria: 1. Heading for the drawings should be located at the top of the sketch (top right -hand corner). The heading should contain: • North arrow (point up or to left) • D9# • Plat name or short plat number • Address (nearest) • Date drawn (or updated) • Thomas Brothers page, grid number 2. Label CBs and MHs with the plan and profile designation. Label the control structure in writing or abbreviate with C.S. Indicate which structures provide spill control. 3. Pipes -- indicate: Pipe size Pipe length Flow direction Use s single heavyweight line 4. Tanks -- use a double, heavyweight line and indicate size (diameter) 5. Access roads • Outline the limits of the road • Fill the outline with dots if the road is gravel. Label in writing if another surface. 6. Other Standard Symbols: 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 1 KING COUNTYOHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIIIDANUAL • Bollards:• ••• ■ ■ ■■ • Rip rap 000000 000000 Fences --x---x---x---x--- x- - -x - -- • Ditches v -CD-CD 7. Label trash racks in writing. 8. Label all streets with the actual street sign designation. If you don't know the actual street name, consult the plat map. 9. Include easements and lot lines or tract limits when possible. 10. Arrange all the labeling or writing to read from left to right or from bottom to top with reference to a properly oriented heading. 11. Indicate driveways or features that may impact access, maintenance or replacement. 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual d le lp 7 Files K CR° Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location :Sea -Tao --- Annual Peak Flow Rates-- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.100 4 0.070 7 0.123 2 0.062 8 0.078 6 0,105 3 0.098 5 0.215 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:predev,tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Peak Flow Rates - -- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.068 0.048 0.075 0,045 0.053 0.073 0.067 0.127 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis 2/09/01 2 :00 1/05/02 16:00 2/27/03 7 :00 8/26/04 2:00 10/28/04 16:00 1/18/06 16:00 11/24/06 3:00 1 1/09/08 6:00 4 2/09/01 15:00 7 1/05/02 16:00 2 2/27/03 7:00 8 8/26/04 2:00 6 10/28/04 16 :00 3 1/18/06 16:00 5 11/24/06 3:00 1 1/09/08 6:00 - - -- -Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) 0.215 0.123 0,105 0 100 0.098 0.078 0.070 0.062 0.185 Period 1 100.00 0,990 2 25.00 0.960 3 10.00 0.900 4 5.00 0.800 S 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 7 1.30 0.231 8 1.10 0.091 50.00 0.980 - -Flow Frequency Analysis------- - Peaks - Rank Return (CFS) 0.127 0.075 0.073 0.068 0.067 0.053 0,048 0.045 0.110 Prob Period 1 100.00 0,990 2 25,00 0,960 3 10.00 0.900 4 5.00 0.800 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 7 1.30 0.231 8 1.10 0.091 50.00 0.980 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW • • The Proposed redevelopment consists of a boundary line adjustment to the current development of 3 residential lots. Impervious surface include the common driveways, proposed and existing houses, patios and walkways. The proposed driveway will include 2,264 square feet of replaced impervious surface. The remainder of the lots will be re- landscaped after the residential structures are constructed. The proposed parking area for the existing houses will be redeveloped from a gravel parking area to a grassed modular grid pavement surface. The proposed parking areas for the new residence will consist of pervious pavers. Best Management Practices (BMP's) were used from the 2005 King County Surface Water Manual to reduce the impact to the wetland buffer from the proposed development. II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY The existing lot is 0.75 acres of residential property with undeveloped with vegetation ranging from brush and grasses. Existing Grades slope from the southwest to northeast. Site access is provided via South 126 Street. No further road improvements are assumed warranted by this project accept pavement restoration from utility tie in connections. HI. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS (DOWNSTREAM — UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS) Drainage from the site is generally conveyed by onsite swales and sheet flow towards the northeast corner of the property until being intercepted by South 126th Street storm drainage system and directed to a Riverton Creak off site to the northeast. Minor sheet flow from the upstream area is conveyed across the northwest portion of the site. All upstream runoff will remain on its current conveyed path. IV. PROPOSED DRAINAGED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed development does not require flow control. BMP's will be used to midigate the proposed development storm runoff. All roof runoff will be piped to a level flow spreader within the proposed wetland buffer. All drainage from the proposed driveway will sheet flow over a grassed filter strip prior to entering into a 2 -foot minimum washed rock swale. V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Circular Solving for Depth of Flow Diameter 0.5000 ft Flowrate 0.2150 cfs — Assume the entire 100 -year storm to enter the pipe. Slope 0.0050 ft/ft - Assume smallest slope to be 0.5% Manning's n 0.0090 Computed Results: Depth 0.2122 ft Area 0.1963 ft2 Wetted Area 0.0793 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 0.7095 ft Perimeter 1.5708 ft Velocity 2.7099 fps Hydraulic Radius 0.1118 ft Percent Full 42.4362 % Full flow Flowrate 0.5731 cfs Full flow velocity 2.9188 fps Critical Information Critical depth 0.2326 ft Critical slope 0.0036 ft/ft Critical velocity 2.4026 fps Critical area 0.0895 ft2 Critical perimeter 0.7506 ft Critical hydraulic radius 0.1192 ft Critical top width 0.4988 ft Specific energy 0.3263 ft Minimum energy 0.3489 ft Froude number 1.1924 Flow condition Supercritical VI. EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN Erosion Control Designs (ESC) has been prepared per the City of Tukwila, since the new site impervious area is not greater then 5,000 sf. The plan, together with the grading/drainage plan, shows all existing and proposed topographic features, ESC notes, ESC details and drainage features. Erosion Control elements shall consist of a Clearing and Grading Limits, rock construction entrance, interceptor swales, silt fencing and use of the a sediment trap as an erosion control pond. VII. BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET VIII. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL All catch basin sumps should have sediment removed when the sumps have more then 1/3 (8 ") of their depth from the bottom to the pipe invert filled. Catch basin grates should have all debris removed from around the grate as soon as it accumulates and it is feasible possible to remove such debris. Conveyance pipe should be inspected periodically and cleaned when more then 20% of the pipe diameter is obstructed by sediment. Inspection should be completed every quarter year for the first year of operation and then every year thereafter. More detailed instructions for maintaining the system is attached. IX. APPENDIX iviap output King County • = County Boundary X Mountain Peaks Contours (511) Streets et , agm y /V Low Parcels SAO Stream dke Ctrl= t A/ Ctrs 2 Penner.* Al Clan 2Sa7mrid lV Ct=3 • tins =clod Shoreline Management Designation corer raicy {core} • 1 01 e•eI Legend Yttr r R•ru Rurd,Ca!ecrravy urtu i UrtralStra Lakes and Large Rivers Streams F3oodway 100 Year Fbodptain SAO Wetland SAO Landsat° SAO Coal Mine SAO Setsmic SAO Erosion Drainage Comptalnts Landslide Hazards or a} Page 1 of 2 D Lirridat Humid 1n ::dn?Iarrd{tmrap Crilicai Aquifer Recharge Area Q creepy c.y The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King C makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King Cc shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits result http: / /www goo /se role t/ com. esri. esrimap. Esriman ?ServiceName= nverview&& S iQionnf overflow 1 1 /2" - 3/4" washed rock overflow 1 1 /2 „ - 3 / 4 " washed rock FIGURE C.2.2.B ALTERNATIVE TRENCH INFILTRATION SYSTEM L grass r 6" min I 18" min 2' min o AO 0 °V o oV ° o 0 0 0 4 44 Voo ooa0 4 ° o L 2' min X- SECTION NTS grass 6" min 15' min filter strip 5' min X- SECTION NTS drivewa 1 from roof NOTE: Same length dimensions and site limitations as typical system NOTE: Same length dimensions 18" min and site limitations as typical system .2.2 FULL INFILTRATION 2005 Surface Water Design Manual - Appendix C 1/24/2005 C -43 FIGURE C.2.1.D 50 -FOOT DISPERSION TRENCH WITH NOTCHED BOARD notched grade board 2 "x 2" notches 18" O.C. 1118 • \/ 1 / 4 o 1' -0 0 o ° o4 O ° o o ° i o° V Q ° o a galvanized bolts 1 ° � 2 "x12 'J pressure treated grade E board 4" x 4' support post v filter fabric 1' -0 pipe O.D. I' -0 min end cap or plug o' / clean out wye from pipe a 4 ° / 4" or 6" perforated pipe laid flat /level ° o °. �° A o °� type I CB w /solid cover (locking) ° C 0 o ]° ° v ° o °o D ° d clean out wye from pipe 4 0� PLAN NTS pipe O.D. I' -0 SECTION A -A NTS influent pipe (max design flow <_ 0.5 CFS per trench) 4" or 6" perforated pipe laid flat clean (<_ 5% fines) 1 - 3 /4" washed rock flow to second dispersal trench if necessary flow to other branching CB's as necessary 2" grade board notches NOTES: C.2.1 FULL DISPERSION type I CB w /solid cover 18" O.C. 1.4-- 2„ 2" 1. This trench shall be constructed so as to prevent point discharge and /or erosion. 2. Trenches may be placed no closer than 50 feet to one another. (100 feet along flowline) 3. Trench and grade board must be level. Align to follow contours of site. 4. Support post spacing as required by soil conditions to ensure grade board remains level. 2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix C 1/24/2005 C -33 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES TOTALS 1. GENERAL ITEMS S, 6 9 3 . D-3- 2. EROSION PREVENTION /SEDIMENT CONTROL (TESL) . 3`�S ' y 3. ROAD AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS 3(0, 0l434 I 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM % ( y ( , e5 5. WATER SYSTEM a, 393. 60 6. SEWER SYSTEM I 5; 33 I . GRAND TOTAL 5 if, y 7-8 , -?- 150% Bond Quantity = (1.5)(GRAND TOTAL) 4 61 ) 2 , Is The quantities above were calculated by: - Pr Printed Name: Signature:] ��� PE License Nu ber: 34,,y Firm Name and Address: - --L_ p A 6. _ ( _, c ___ /0512 .Je: - c $ t* S"T12t3'T 14 -I of I<.►2$.L‘,r9-7,.) t.9 A 7 go 33 t Date: 57 fp Telephone Number: 2 089 y s Fax Number: "0 6f3?- 6 E -mail : e r » 4-1 p ea..c. � itL. _ c�,v\.. Approved Nov. 2002 CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department 206 - 433 -0179 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY 1 GENERAL ITEMS Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Clear /Remove Brush by hand Acre $1,320.00 Clear /Grub/Tree Removal Acre , c $6,820.00 ' I '9. 9.3 2- Common Excavation CY ) 0. 4 $1.30 /6$.80 Trench Excavation CY $3.30 Embankment - Backfill and compact with select material CY $4.00 Trench - Backfill and compact with select material CY $6.30 Borrow - Fill and compact CY $12.30 Gravel Base - Fill and compact CY $17.20 Topsoil - Imported CY $17.60 Grading - Fine with a grader SY $0.80 Grading - Fine by hand SY $1.45 Fence - Cedar, 6' high LF $27.50 Fence - Vinyl coated chain link, 6' high LF $11.00 Fence Gate - Vinyl coated chain link, 20' wide EACH $990.00 Fence - Wildlife passable (NGPE & SAT) LF /4/0 $5.50 G S O , ab Survey - Monuments EACH $110.00 Survey - Lot lines DAY / $693.00 (AS. at Survey - Line and grade DAY s $561.00 ` ' a 2 , o. Trail - 4" crushed cinder SY $7.15 Trail - 4" crushed surfacing top course SY $6.60 Wall - Gabion, 3' thick, no earthwork SY $106.70 Wall - Retaining, with earthwork SY a (p $23.10 , O0 , too General Subtotal 5, 23 (. o Sales Tax @ 8.8% 1 7 / (00. Yi- GENERAL ITEMS TOTAL 5.- 6/.5.07- Approved Nov. 2002 2 • DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY TESC Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Fence - Silt (installation and removal) LF / to O $1.40 02 y Fence - Temporary, drip line & NGPE /SAT) LF $1.10 Hydroseeding ACRE $1,980.00 Hydroseeding, fertilizing, mulching ACRE $2,750.00 Seeding - By hand SY $0.40 Mulch - Straw, 3" by hand SY $0.55 a 7. Sa Mulch - Straw, 2" by machine ACRE $2,200.00 $0.00 Fabric - Geotextile SY $1.65 Catch Basin Protection - Insert EACH cZ $33.00 (do 00 Catch Basin Protection - Geotextile a& rock EACH $22.00 Outfall - Silt trap or pond overflow EACH $660.00 Interceptor dike /swale LF $1.00 Hay bale silt trap EACH $55.00 Brush Barrier LF $0.30 Stabilized construction entrance - 15' by 50' EACH $1,155.00 Stabilized construction entrance - 15' by 100' EACH $1,980.00 Pipe slope drains LF $2.20 Level spreader LF $1.65 Silt Trap EACH $550.00 Silt Pond EACH $1,650.00 TESC Subtotal 3 - , S O Sales Tax @ 8.8% .27._.,,-/ TESC TOTAL 3"/ S , y if Approved Nov. 2002 3 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY ROAD & PARKING IMPROVEMENTS Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals AC Grinding - 4' machine SY / S $7.70 1 k5 .5'O AC Removal /Disposal /Repair SY i 5' $88.00 / - 30. 00 Curb - Extruded asphalt LF $2.20 Curb - Extruded concrete LF - a $2.20 / 1 1, -f O Curb & Gutter - Vertical LF $7.70 Curb & Gutter - Demolish /Dispose LF $11.33 Sidewalk - Concrete - Demolish /Dispose SY $24.75 Sawcut - Asphalt, 3" deep LF '31- $1.43 5"P-.1 I Sawcut - Concrete, per 1" depth over 3" LF $1.21 Sealant - Asphalt LF '�- $0.77 e? g , sv Shoulder - CSTC TONS $16.50 Sidewalk - Concrete, 4" thick with 4" CSTC SY $22.00 Sidewalk - Concrete, 5" thick with 4" CSTC SY $26.40 Striping - 4" reflectorized LF $0.28 Striping - per parking stall EA $3.00 Thickened asphalt edge LF $5.17 Pavement Markings - Channelization arrows EACH $82.50 Signs - Traffic channelization EACH $55.00 Overlay - Asphalt concrete - (2.05 tons /CY) TONS $44.00 Pavement - Asphalt concrete, <300 tons (2.05 tons /CY) TONS $41.80 Pavement - Asphalt concrete, >300 tons SY a 9-5- $35.20 ! (p $ Asphalt treated base (ATB) - (2.05 tons /CY) TONS $38.50 CSTC - (1.85 tons /CY) TONS $16.50 CSBC - (1.85 tons /CY) TONS $16.50 Gravel base (1.85 tons /CY) TONS $9.90 Geotextile fabric - Structural $1.65 Guard rail LF $22.00 $0.00 Pavement markings - Raised, Type 1 EACH $3.30 Arrows - Thermoplastic EACH $82.50 Lane marking - Thermoplastic LF $3.30 Sign - Stop 30 "x30 ", VIP grad EACH $82.50 Sign - Street name, 9" X length, 6" letters EACH $44.00 Signs - Miscellaneous traffic EACH $38.50 Median - Non - traversible, C curbing EACH $5.50 Barricade - Type Ill LF $33.00 Traffic signal - Fully actuated (includes design) EACH $220,000.00 • DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY Approved Nov. 2002 4 Street light - City -owned EACH $5,500.00 at9Y a ),j 'O 6 1. - AS 5 Ad - 5 F /o Road & Parking Subtotal 3 3 . 3 Sales Tax @ 8.8% ;5; • 4 ) 3 ROAD & PARKING TOTAL 0 4R. CSTC - Crushed surfacing top course CSBC - Crushed surfacing base course DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY Approved Nov. 2002 5 DRAINAGE SYSTEM Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Inlet/Yard Drain Each $385.00 Catch Basin -Type I Each 1 $935.00 q,35 ° c Catch Basin -Type 2, 48" Each $1,430.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $352.00 Catch Basin - Type 2, 54" Each $1,595.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $407.00 Catch Basin - Type 2, 60" Each $1,760.00 Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $341.00 Catch Basin - Type 2, 72" Each $2,420.00 • Add for depth over 4' per foot Feet $572.00 Cleanout, PVC, 4" dia. Each $94.60 Cleanout, PVC, 6" dia. Each L/ $126.50 5406 Cleanout, PVC, 8" dia. Each $156.20 Drain pipe, PVC, 4" LF $4.95 Drain pipe, PVC, 6" LF 0 2 00 $7.15 / y,3o . ea Drain pipe, PVC, 8" LF $8.80 Storm pipe, Concrete, 8" LF $16.50 Storm pipe, Concrete, 12" LF $19.80 Storm pipe, PVC, 8" LF $8.80 Storm pipe, PVC, 12" LF $16.50 Storm pipe, PVC, 15" LF . $20.90 Storm pipe, PVC, 18 ". LF $25.30 Storm pipe; PVC, 24" LF $33.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 8" LF $11.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 12" LF $16.50 Storm pipe, CMP, 15" LF $20.90 Storm pipe, CMP, 18" LF $24.20 Storm pipe, CMP, 24" LF $33.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 30" LF $42.90 Storm pipe, CMP, 36" LF $71.50 Storm pipe, CMP, 42" LF $88.00 Storm pipe, CMP, 48" LF $93.50 Storm pipe, CMP, 60" LF $137.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 15" LF $25.30 Storm pipe, RCP, 18" LF $30.80 Storm pipe, RCP, 24" LF $44.00 Storm pipe, RCP, 30" LF $71.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 36" LF $93.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 42" LF $115.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 48" LF $126.50 Storm pipe, RCP, 60" LF $181.50 Pond Overflow Spillway SY $8.80 Restrictor - OWS, 12" Each $880.00 Restrictor - OWS, 15" Each $990.00 Restrictor - OWS, 18" Each $1,155.00 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY Approved Nov. 2002 6 Restrictor - OWS, 24" E Each $ $1,430.00 Trash rack, 15" E Each $ $203.50 Trash rack, 18" E Each $ $231.00 Trash rack, 21" E Each $ $264.00 Trash rack, 24" E Each $ $330.00 Riprap, Light, Loose T Tons $ $66.00 Quarry Spalls, 4" to 8" T Tons $ $49.50 Trench - Infiltration, per 100 feet F Feet / / ,/ 0 i ii /oce). Co J J 1 00 Perforated stub -out system E Each Trench - Flow dispersal, per 100 feet F Feet Sign - Stormwater Facility E Each $ $330.00 Drainage System Subtotal t t...1?/, Ofl State Sales Tax 8.8% 3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM TOTAL 4 4 4 to y (p • SS DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY Approved Nov. 2002 7 ''WATER SYSTEM Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals Water Main - Ductile iron, CL 52, 6" LF Water Main - Ductile iron, CL 52, 8" LF Water Main - Ductile iron, CL 52, 10" LF Water Main - Ductile iron, CL 52, 12" LF Gate Valve, 6" EACH Gate Valve, 8" EACH Gate Valve, 10" EACH Gate Valve, 12" EACH Fire Hydrant Assembly, With guard posts EACH $1,200.00 Fire Hydrant Assembly, Without guard posts EACH $950.00 Air -Vac, 8" EACH Air -Vac, 10" EACH Air -Vac, 12" EACH PRVA, 8" EACH PRVA, 10" EACH PRVA, 12" EACH Backflow — Irrigation Backflow — Fire Line Backflow — Water supply 3J l ' (.....20 r n. - e_rt- eikk a_ 409. e' 1.2 00 'llzt 2 MA ,£ SCO36° o oa Water System Subtotal P, AOC). oa Sales Tax @ 8.8% �� / q .3. b 0 WATER SYSTEM TOTAL °2 39 3. Lo DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY 8 Sewer pipe, PVC, 8" LF X60 $27.50 , y 5 / Sewer pipe, PVC, 12" LF $33.00 Sewer pipe, PVC, LF $0.00 Manhole, 48" EACH $1,430.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $352.00 Manhole, 54" EACH $1,595.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $407.00 Manhole, 60" EACH $1,760.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $451.00 Manhole, 72" EACH $2,530.00 Additional depth over 4' per foot FEET $572.00 Grease Interceptor 3A1Q. C.o. S" "s.°° 0 sco Sewer System Subtotal V00.00 y31. are Sales Tax @ 8.8% • SEWER SYSTEM TOTAL . S, 33 J , aD 1 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN 1C ENGINEER ESTIMATE AND BOND QUANTITY SEWER SYSTEM SSS, PVC 4" SSS, PVC 6" SSS, PVC 8" Unit Quantity Unit Price Subtotals LF LF LF 9 $5.50 $8.25 11. +fir oA r 1 opm x r fn r)AU� t'r� •n45 '%Wi'Y. fG�O tiY'Y� d iY� t, r ". ri I it,' P1 1 tr �il ,r �,�1i,y at ' ' '� ,s ���,: ... a.,.. $ ,r , c fii ....c1I , Ara f r !!0 +e r >M..a.i ata4 . r u CITY OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED MAY 15 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit Center /Build Division; 206-431-3670 V Public Works Department: 206 - 433 -0179 Planning Division: 206 - 431 -3670 Site address (attach map and legal description showing hydrant location and size of main): 3 /c Jr t ST" 134- stoO-- O(o• Name: 6 • n'Lp Eact Address: 3_1.x1 / ..Die 411 ST !co la Address: Phone: Phone: 006 c 914.4 -11 c! This certificate is for the purposes of: esidentlal Building Permit ❑ Commercial /Industrial Building Permit ❑ Rezone Estimated number of service connections and water meter size(s): Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure is ft. Area is served by (Water Utility District): Owner /Agent Signature 1. The proposed project is within a N / kA (Use separate sheet if more room is needed) CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Required only if outside City of Tukwila water district ❑ Preliminary Plat PERMIT NO.: ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Other � I IailoS Date v (City /County) 2. a.Ple improvements required. 3. The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it Into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection and to meet the State cross connection control requirements: 4. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of 4 15" at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of /? fps as documented by the attached calculations. 5. Water a3ya lability: Acceptable service can be provided to this project Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in Item B -2 are met. System is not capable of providing service to this project. I hereby ,certify that the above information is true and correct. d Cd (L)( —mic cS7 AgencY(/ hone 206 - Z- gs4 By This certificate is not valid without Water District No. 125's attachment entitled "Attachment to Certificate of Water Availability." 91 Dat fc2f�ltes // zZ —t7 '7I inir „ � �N`"�h' >I,tvr can't -r, 74777,717. 117 Site address (attach map and legal description showing hydrant location and size of main): 37c X �,.. r! MINIM • gym+ -, :u r. •J!n Name: Address: Phone: Name:: g c m bei 1 Address:3 -7, -, z . (D�-111 ST Phone: g 0040 — BSI This certificate is for the purposes of: isidential Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat 0 Commercial /Industrial Building Permit ❑ Rezone Estimated number of service connections and water meter size(s): Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure is ft. Area is served by ; = ter Utility District): Owner /Agent Sign "° CITY OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 96188 1. The proposed project is within ( (..A.1?.. — L4 - 11: 1 - t 2. 5.P16improvements required. 3. The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring It Into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection and to meet the State cross connection control requirements: Al s4 (Use separate sheaf if more room is needed) 4. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of 'z ig.S ° at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of 10 fps as documented by the attached calculations. 5. Water availability: Acceptable service can be provided to this project Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in Item B -2 are met. System is not capable of providing service to this project. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. (0 AA) l4- - riitr --iV () 2*- 2 S gen hone "10te — Z ( f2 —FY RECEIVED MAY 15 2006 co vey M � CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Required only if outside City of Tukwila water district By This certificate is not valid without Water District No. 125's attachment entitled "Attachment to Certificate of Water Availability.” Permit Center /Build Division: 206-431 -3670 Public Works Department: 206 - 433 -0179 Planning Division: 206 - 431 -3670 [] Short Subdivision ❑ Other PERMIT NO.: II /fit /O Date (City /County) goi /I-1-$C-44 S, Date £fp li-c " 1( z z -6 P art A: (To Be Completed by Applicant) : 1: [ j Purpose of Certificate: Q Building Permit JI Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Other ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone Proposed Use: tia Residential Single Family ❑ Residential Multi - Family ❑ Commercial ❑ Other Applicants Name: A 4 e ',I./ fwcfe Phone: 206. — 2 yy,-. S it? Property Address or Approximate Location: Tax Lot Number: 37 Xx J, W . T i _ - # ' 734 S6 o6 ?d Legal Description(Attach Map and Legal Description if necespary): �� o�� Z-,+ 7 /3 /vac `, p we_' Rei e / tte�rr__ :g.„4-0,-,),4 R& e'✓; TY Part B „ :(To Completed by Sewer Agency 1. ❑ a. Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR 0 b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and /or ❑ (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and /or 1I ►7 ' (3) other (describe): Cov►.s`frvc- o4-/ of 4 Se_ war s ✓ et.? S , /l $ 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan, OR ❑ b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the District, OR ❑ b. Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: PERMIT: $ a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: GFC: $ SFC: $ UNIT: $ TOTAL: $ (Subject to Change on January 1st) King County/METRO Capacity Charge: Currently, $4136.93 /residential equivalent, will be billed directly by King County after connection to the sewer system. (Subject to change by King Co /Metro without notice.) b. Easements: ❑ Required ❑ May be Required c. Other: r- v er w :ir: ,o ; :„;4sk 9,ORK1NG TOWARD<A 8ETT tENVWROPN.1EPdr' : e�!°'.t�at ,x:z . r NC �� ^G � .'�+�.tw - 14816 Mili ; ! Road South , e P.O. Box j °. 0 Tukwila, 98168 RECEIVED Phone: (206) 242 -3236 Fax: (206) 242 -1527 MAY 15 2006 C , = . • . ,i t- I ERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON-AVAILABILITY: 131 Certificate of Sewer Availability OR ❑ Certificate of Sewer Non - Availability I hereby certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year fro; a date of signature. Title Date • • ATTACHMENT TO VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON- AVAILABILITY The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Val Vue Sewer District ( "District ") Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non - Availability ( "Certificate "). 1. This Certificate is valid only for the real property referenced herein ( "Property "), which is in the District's service area, for the sole purpose of submission to the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, King County Department of Public Health, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Burien and /or City of SeaTac. This Certificate is between the District and the applicant only, and no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency, third -party beneficiary principles or otherwise. 2. This Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant and its successors and assigns, and does not constitute and may not be relied upon as the District's guarantee that sewer service will be available at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 3. As of the date of the District's signature on this Certificate, the District represents that sewer service is available to the Property through sewer systems that exist or that may be extended by the applicant. The District makes no other representations, express or implied, including without limitation that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations from King County, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Burien, City of SeaTac or any other governmental agency before the applicant can utilize the sewer service which is the subject of this Certificate. 4. If the District or the applicant must extend the District's sewer system to provide sewer service to the Property, the District or applicant may be required to obtain from the appropriate governmental agency the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations. In addition, the governmental agency may establish requirements that must be satisfied as a condition of granting any such permits, approvals or authorizations, which may make impractical or impossible the provision of sewer services to the Property. 5. Application for and possible provision of sewer service to the Property shall be subject to and conditioned upon availability of sewer service to the Property at the time of such application, and compliance with federal, state, local and District laws, ordinances, policies, and /or regulations in effect at the time of such application. knowledge at ha e received the Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non Availability and this chment, nd fu ly u erstand the terms and conditions herein. ' A4. Cori cA ow 1 Applicant's Signature 1 1 Date 89539100] t270798.0115SY601!.DOC (1/26/04) -1- 1 • 15- foot- esmt.txt Parcel name: 11i( " - E(tr- North: 4547.9908 East : 4879.6475 Line Course: S 00 -41 -03 W Length: 99.94 North: 4448.0580 Curve Length: 23.79 Delta: 26 -43 -46 Chord: 23.58 Course In: S 89 -18 -57 E RP North: 4447.4490 End North: 4425.0558 Curve Length: 23.79 Delta: 26 -43 -46 Chord: 23.58 Course In: S 63 -57 -17 W RP North: 4402.6627 End North: 4402.0537 Curve Length: 4.71 Delta: 90 -00 -00 Chord: 4.24 Course In: S 89 -18 -57 E RP North: 4402.0179 End North: 4399.0181 Line Course: S 89 -18 -57 E North: 4398.7912 Line Course: S 00 -41 -03 W North: 4344.7951 Line Course: N 89 -18 -57 W North: 4345.2966 Line Course: N 00 -41 -03 E North: 4399.2927 Line Course: S 89 -18 -57 E North: 4399.2689 Curve Length: 4.71 Delta: 90 -00 -00 Chord: 4.24 Course In: N 00 -41 -03 E RP North: 4402.2686 End North: 4402.2328 Curve Length: 16.79 Delta: 26 -43 -46 Chord: 16.64 Page 1 • East : 4878.4542 Radius: 51.00 Tangent: 12.12 Course: S 12 -40 -50 E Course Out: S 63 -57 -17 W East : 4929.4505 East : 4883.6297 Radius: 51.00 Tangent: 12.12 Course: S 12 -40 -50 E Course Out: S 89 -18 -57 E East : 4837.8089 East : 4888.8053 Radius: 3.00 Tangent: 3.00 Course: S 44 -18 -57 E Course Out: S 00 -41 -03 W East : 4891.8051 East : 4891.7692 Length: 19.00 East : 4910.7679 Length: 54.00 East : 4910.1231 Length: 42.00 East : 4868.1261 Length: 54.00 East : 4868.7709 Length: 2.00 East : 4870.7707 Radius: 3.00 Tangent: 3.00 Course: N 45 -41 -03 E Course Out: S 89 -18 -57 E East : 4870.8066 East : 4873.8063 Radius: 36.00 Tangent: 8.55 Course: N 12 -40 -50 W RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 15- foot- esmt.txt Course In: N 89 -18 -57 W RP North: 4402.6627 End North: 4418.4696 Curve Length: 30.79 Delta: 26 -43 -46 Chord: 30.51 Course In: N 63 -57 -17 E RP North: 4447.4490 End North: 4448.2371 Page 2 Course Out: N 63 -57 -17 E East : 4837.8089 East : 4870.1530 Radius: 66.00 Tangent: 15.68 Course: N 12 -40 -50 W Course Out: N 89 -18 -57 W East : 4929.4505 East : 4863.4552 Line Course: N 00 -41 -03 E Length: 99.94 North: 4548.1699 East : 4864.6486 Line Course: S 89 -18 -57 E Length: 15.00 North: 4547.9908 East : 4879.6475 Perimeter: 490.48 Area: 4,530 sq. ft. 0.10 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0000 Course: S 00 -00 -00 W Error North: - 0.00000 East : 0.00000 Precision 1: 490,460,000.00 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 15 200 6 BOUNDARY LINE Department of Community DevelopmsMMP N I EN r ADJU ST MENT/LOT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 1 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 CONSOLIDATION E - mail: tukplan(g2,ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION Sot.-a4 12, ( LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. PL 5 d 3i - S.( Z G 1 3'. - 4440 i or tool g 816 8 1 33 56 30 ) 4345 ?6 Quarter: S GJ Section: 1 0 Township: 2) Range: T (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent Name: AmOt) .1-4(40PtDF Address: "p Z S. t ZGM 'S . ) ri t t (tA ) Lv A ?8 (6 p (264) S'O f "S` FAX: 246) R �F�f S 51111 Phone: �x0( C1 J Signature: _ / Date: y / 201s (p FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P- BLA/LC Planner: File Number: L, c.2 6 - C) 3 5. Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: re- t, C 6 - L 0 (� Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: L oG —c 6, NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 15 200 6 BOUNDARY LINE Department of Community DevelopmsMMP N I EN r ADJU ST MENT/LOT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 1 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 CONSOLIDATION E - mail: tukplan(g2,ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION Sot.-a4 12, ( LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. PL 5 d 3i - S.( Z G 1 3'. - 4440 i or tool g 816 8 1 33 56 30 ) 4345 ?6 Quarter: S GJ Section: 1 0 Township: 2) Range: T (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent Name: AmOt) .1-4(40PtDF Address: "p Z S. t ZGM 'S . ) ri t t (tA ) Lv A ?8 (6 p (264) S'O f "S` FAX: 246) R �F�f S 51111 Phone: �x0( C1 J Signature: _ / Date: y / 201s (p Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning RECEIVCr I AY APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1 5 2006 V E L OPM 1. Application Checklist 1 co mdicatin items submitted with a lication. pp (1 copy) indicating application. ° NT 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (4 copies). ,,, ' 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11 ". 4. Application Fee — BLA in LDR $250, other zones $450 -- Lot Consolidation in LDR $75, other zones $150 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: ,,/ 5. Vicinity Map with site location. ✓ 6. Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record (per TMC Title 17 and RCW Chapter 58.17), showing all known easements and encumbrances. 7. Provide any required maintenance agreements, easements or other documents ready for recording. 8. Provide King County Health Department approval if there are any septic systems on site. Items 9 through 11 NOT required for lot consolidations or BLAs without vacant lots 9. Document sewer and water availability if provided by other than the City of Tukwila. .,/ 10. Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis per King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). For additional guidance contact Public Works. ������////// 11. Provide sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45) for example wetland or geotechnical reports. RECORDING DOCUMENT: a template is available from the City in AutoCAD format 12 (a) The recording document must meet the King County Assessor's recording format requirements (letter, legal or record of survey format). % (b) Drawing must include a graphic scale, space for the City of Tukwila file number and north arrow. It shall include the elements listed at TMC 17.08.030 B. (c) Provide legal descriptions of all lots before and after the proposed changes. (d) The recording documents must include signature blocks for the owner(s), Short Subdivision Committee, Assessor, and Recorder. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). G: APPHAN \LANDUSE.APP \BLAAP.doc, 08/20/03 Check items submitted with application Information ,_ quired. May be waived in unusual cases, u pon approval of both Public Works and Planning Total lots in this Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. (e) Existing and proposed lot lines shall be shown solid with new lines called out and lot lines to be removed shall be shown dashed. 2 ) (f) Show existing and proposed utility easements (water, sewer, septic drainfields, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). ✓ (g) List total lot area and average width of each proposed residential lot. (h) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. (i) Show any required fire access lanes and turn- arounds per Fire Department standards. (j) Show the location and distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures, indicating those to be removed. SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: NOT required for lot consolidations or BLAs without vacant lots / 13 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". t/ (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. (d) Show proposed lot and tract lines. CIVIL PLANS: NOT required for lot consolidations or BLAs without vacant lots 14 (a) Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. i sewer, (c) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. ✓ V (d) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the TIR and KCSWDM. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. (e) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (f) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (g) Plan, profile and cross - section for any right -of -way improvements. (h) Show planned access to lots, driveways, fire access lanes and turn- arounds. (i) Show the location and distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures, indicating those to be removed. (j) Show proposed lot and tract lines. Total existing lots prior to lot consolidation. 3 Total lots in this Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. 2 ) Total acres in Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. f GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REQUIRED INFORMATION G: APPHAN \LANDUSE.APP \BLAAP.doc, 08/20/03 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER DECLARATION Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owners) In fee simple of the land herein described do hereby make a boundary line adjustment. The undersigned further declare this boundary line adjustment to be the graphic representation of said boundary line adjustment and the carte Is made with the free consent end In accordance with the desire tithe owner(s). In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals. Name: Name: Name: Name: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me tome known to be the Individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand end official seal this day of . 20 STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me to known to be the Individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that heluhe signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of . 20 LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I Ike of QA n, certify � 5 on an actual u ey the surveyor described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown hereon correctly, and that moreonenls other than those monuments approved for setting at a later date, have been set and lot corners staked on the ground as depicted on the plat URVEY SE 114 OF SW 1n, IF SECTION 10 T. 23 N,R. 4 E. EN., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON City of TWcwdla Department of Community Development 6300 Sauthcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 55100 Telephone (206) 4314670 FAX (206)4314665 Ernall: tukplanfk Signature: Name as commissioned: Title: My appointment expires: Signature: Name as commissioned: Title: My appointment expires: REWRDai6 CERIIRCATE Fin for wad aEsmoe EA City at Tunis era dar m at naeW Mn U,wd ,motdedM Wlmn el Fla. en pap noon col Cony. Meant= OLD DESCRIPTION LOTS 5, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON. A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. NEW DESCRIPTION LOT "A" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; ALL OF LOT 5, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 27.57 FEET OF LOT 6, BLOCK 9 RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH A INGRESS. EGRESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. LOT "8" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. THE SOUTH 96.75 FEET OF LOTS 6 AND 7, EXCEPT THE EAST 27.57 FEET, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. TOGETHER AND SUBJECT TO A INGRESS, EGRESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. LOT "C" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, ALL OF LOTS 6 AND 7 EXCEPT THE THE SOUTH 96.75 FEET AND THE EAST 27.57 FEET, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON. A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER AND SUBJECT TO A INGRESS, EGRESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. A INGRESS. EGRESS EASEMENT. FOR LOTS A,B & C DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON. A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS. PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THENCE N 89.18'57" W. A DISTANCE OF 92.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S 00.41'03" W, A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET, TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 23.79 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.79 FEET THOUGHT A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ",TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT WITH SAID CURVE, THENCE S B9.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET, THENCE S 00.4103" W, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE N 69.18'57" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET, THENCE N 00.41'03" E, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET. TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 FEET, THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ". TO A BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 16.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 30.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT TO SAID CURVE. THENCE N 00.41'03' E A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS ON THE SOUTH MARGIN UNE OF SOUTH 126TH STREET, THENCE S B9.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. awNEar4 AARON HUNDTOSTE & BRIE CAMPBELL AUK: 3725 SOUTH 126TH STREET mate 206-850-5535 DRAWN BY flIFfleFfi RV APPROVALS KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION I certify that all property taxes are paid and that a deposit has been made in sufficient amount to pay the taxes for the following year that there are no delinquent special assessments certified to this office for collection; and that all special assessments or any of the property herein dedicated as streets, alleys, or for other public use are paid In full. This day of 20 King County Treasurer Deputy King County Treasurer KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved by the Department of Assessments thla day of 20 King County Assessor Deputy Assessor Parcel Number(s) TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this day of 20 Chairperson, Short Subdivision Committee COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BT SURVEYS B.R. I DATE ROArS VICINITY MAP 12415 9 DR SE EVERETT, WA 96208 425- 344 -6231 4 -10 -06 vCa UWE PAGE 2006003 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Sou enter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 4314870 FAX (206) 4314685 E4aal tukMmq&krkwUa.wana 0 5.110 20' Lot 15 P T H 40' - vat SCALE: 1" = 20' to N N w O n � Vi z 0 0 N N OLD PL, MEAS. 49.93 (R.O S.) 0 0 O N N O O z 60' N89M8'57 'W 14.9.80 MEAS. (RAS. 6 PROPERTY LWL' 7 30 NEW PR 15' INGRESS -i• EGRESS ESM'T NEW LOT "C" 8.911 SQ. FEET 0.20 ACRES OLD (Lot 7) C6 N89'18'57 "W NEW PROPERT NEW LOT "B" 6.995 SQ. FEET 0.16 ACRES S. 126th St. W TO 0 0 0 z w z J )- I- K W a 0 cc a 0 J 0 11 I 1+, BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 11-6 72. LINE CS PL, MEA N M W N) O ;t 0 0 z w z � J K W a 0@ a. C1 Z C2 INGRESS ' EGRESS 1.) EASEMENT O st O O z L4 U) N m 0) . 49.93 (R.O.S.) OLD PL. MEAS. 49.93 (R.O.S.) O O O N N --- 92.00 O O O N N (Lot 6) w z NEW W F') O O O z 0 J 0 OWNER($ AARON HUNDTOSTE k BRIE CAMPBELL ASS 3725 S. 126111 STREET OIYISTAIEop: TUKWILA, WA 98168 S89'18'57 "E ti 174.99 o f of of 150.00 PLAT N I ERTY LINE 77.50 NEW LOT "A" 17,050 SQ. FEET 0.39 ACRES OLD (Lot 5) House 1 Lot 18 k4NEW PROPERTY LINE 72.30 NEW PRk5ERTY LINE 77.50 - N8918'57`W 149.80 MEAS. (R.O.S.) ( 150.00 PLAT .J Lot 16 I Lot 17 1 Lot 1 Lot 2 9 6Ro toE9 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 19 DRAWN BY CHECLWN BY BRASS DISK W /PUNCH, IN CONCRETE, IN CASE BT SURVEYS B.R. B.R. O . cP 0 \ LUTE BASIS OF REARING RECORD OF SURVEY AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050603900014, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (ROS) RFFERFNCFS: RECORD OF SURVEY, 20020610900013. EASEMENT TABLE L1 Cl C2 C3 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 C4 C5 C6 L7 500'41'03'W 99.94 26.43'46' AL 23.79 26.43'46' AL. 23.79 90.00'00' AL 4.71 S89'18'57"E 19.00 S00'41'03'W 54.00 N8918'57'W 42.00 N00'41'03'E 54.00 50918'57'E 2.00 90.00'00' AL 4.71 26.43'46' AL 16.79 26.43'46' A.L 30.79 N00'41'03'E 99.94 12415 9 DR SE EVERETT, WA 98208 425 - 344 -62311 4 -10 -06 1 " =20' RECORDING No. BRASS DISK W /X, IN CONCRETE, IN CASE I VOLUME PAGE RECEIVE MAY 1 2( COMM Hurry utVELOPMEN J08 NUMBER 2006003 SHEET 2 OF 2 r D 06 • cxa . rice ana appravca 7n//s /am.aayor/wry A. D. /9 A. L. Volenhne Caunl,19Jrvcynr Accented Aby the canmiss/oncra of flx Co- unty of /ring this /64 day of May /5196. 17.16/771 G40i•771:7n Artest J• f' . .Agne w Clerk of //v beard of Covnly Commissioners. By W, Ht Hanna Deputy •. f 3 i I I I O, JAi Cyr.RO £.f'l Ti2PII s GO .•S` a r.• \ I I ■ 1 I \ \ \ I 1 1 • 'Y � Y \ \ 1 1 I \ % I I 1 .` 1 I t s J 1 , a /N I t • bESCRlPTION T/ /421 of R/bi,ara/v ••A .orkAysr OP P & r7" as 1T /yER.7/OE /NYERURBAN 774ACT3, ix/udcs tracts 2. 3.244 s, 2& a S�+ of 27 P 9.3 o, .9s, 31f the oast 3 /4 ofao "the east s/4 of39; 4/, 4e, 4.3, s/, anSr $4 e reh%v thc• :twat /. /Potcres fhcreaf,• aka the 15 /,owirry/� dexrila;d porrl ia tnve/ 46:'^ Ccr Pfr nurrv� Stbe Near of .sold 1/Zr., 48 at tt, /ir{ersec/bn of the was** / /he of•O0► /ntjr&w7 ,'?/ of Way with the elms/ /il7G of sad t/oct46, thence eouNr. a /onq me 7i /g / &A l/ne /O40..9 fit thence N.494W .3 (5/ ft Me east /Inc of the Coi/4/V ; 90el, thencc no ry ab' the sod entrt line of the County i? d / //6T.3ff. 'lathe neesy: 01 i7a maid Right of Way thence southeaster/9 ,' / /n ✓ %u•fis mss.. /Any :: F K.e o:.:Hf ..t rii .. • en ••. 1_ icy ter_ -! _i• a. - - 3 4.. 2 • • ACKNOWLEDGMENT • L.7: Turner Asst .Secrefi y DEDICATION /holy a// nay, by Wiese $sents: that the Union Trust carnpany a cwpona},isr agonized aid ervth - ,ernFler / &7a s of fil 6'7We of Wozhalgton bei4 the owner /n 1Fe ample elf the /o/o,i erty h1 /e ernbirsc• abes here-by decbre they pez, of 7ririwrnyV.i ffZrsu pin "wry" rervanarba rlvresuuta w Tsrgcrm ard dedcal s fore ,n the use bf iXa' jrtyb/a Jtreofs o/O" Reads ohown thereon. • In witness %w ee%oWihe sai? corporation /vs caused ifs sigrwffve io be a7f : . 0 . 7 :- ired to by its 9Q?•asiucnt and Asti Serratisr 4/d affixed ifs coroorafe ,sea/ in .,e testafio/i he of dtf rs stb day of May /$ 9 t � ` �. - Waleson G, LSqur>. t. • President 5*/e of Wcuhu7g/v i) C•7ty of Xing • /+r,sonafy appeared /afore me a Notary Public in and for the • :. 61ai.e of Wloshi/gton Watson C.. Squire anal L.77 Turn er 7b me personally ' JV/oa4 a to 4ew yes vective✓y t/� Aiwa:Vent and Asst• Secretary of /he linker WW1" .4/� who execated on behalf ofaa/d Company the gore inadrumcnt a, ' who acknowledged tome t/Y�t they signed a sealea Joe some acYhe. act anal deed of sake corpora/kW for the purposes therein mentiohed• • Witness my /a and offi a /sof/ this 5 day of May /906 r � ' F• H, Whitworth a o Nolan Public in and fir #h... rt, of Wash- 1 045 0871 210 21 J 12 20 13 832011$ 0005 8320 23 19 77939, 1.79 AC 18 0430 17 14 13 11 190' 190 26 25 i Cf _ 8 1653006, 0850 9 rieN sci \./ 11 12 = MNZ 10 10 n 155121 D 0860 D C 9 , wn 210000s / 6 p 5 � 211 0 0855 78110s 0870 an •2• ! inIn n. 7 t /011.0s____25t01; r-100 28TH S ..n U 75600s 420. 756405 15 16 190 1 3 14 8 5 0830 1` ;i 0625 9500#s 190000s r_ •n ` ^ rte 190 7 0640 142500$ 96650s 7 640s 0025 o„ 80600s 59'.62 60 i . 94.95g r 2 28 .77 AC 7 a I �-- 1" 0385 188.72 V 27 �; 8 0 -13 } Z (6500 g 1' 0 8° • 20. 204 WI 3 ao t B24 12 200 .6 co 25 23 22 21 20 19 b 13 rho • 9 '17601 14 18040 16250 k e 8 1 10 18 195518 4.49 AC SC MNZ 9 15; 16 1 10C 1 s 204,15 9 220.5 17 8 0690 220000s • A1 , i 220000 5 6 0695 18 110000 19 1E 1.31 • �` 7598 120. 116230s 218.97 N 1 0949 4 1149Q11 20 47 21 734d04s 0 23 130 24 V 25 JO JO 10 20 10 43 INTERUR g 5 ,12800s ., SQUIRE'S 1 REPLA 285.7 } 142.85 4) 1 OBE 2 c 1 O F PART 3 1.01 A TR 33 RI ER W IDE 4 4950 4 5 ... 142.85 50 6, 55004 30, 50 BAN 55000 2650005 649040s 13 50 12 °j. 802 45.7 5 • TRACTS � �9 f VOL 2 —100 55000 214 ,,,18.7. .,. 43 8„ e 55000 S 126TH ST MNS 45 • 290 1023660s 1880005 223390s 0; 4 110610 2 1 ;: X2875 s SCC 54737 325000s �1 74370s 196 JOB NO. 2003007 SCALE: 1" = 20' DRAFTED: T. W.K. CHECKED: D.O. DAME' 3 -2 -05 SHEET of Lot 8 Lot 15 CB Rim 104.88 IE 12' Conc. E. 101.68 It 12 Conc. W. 101.78 i� N 89'18'57' � ♦ e San MH Rim 99.49 FloMine E - N 86.57 Flowline W 86.57 CB Rim 103.31 IE 12' ABS E. 98.89 IE 12 ABS W. 98.92 L )� ° Lot 16 Lot 17 99a7 S. 126th St. IE 24' E. 90.85 It 12' W. 95.04 • 104.28 Lot 18 Drain MH Rim 98.26 \ FloMile to open) elevation 91.50 Top Center Bolt \ (Unable to open) ( of Hydrant IE 91.38 Devotion 103.90 9 4... \ 49.93' Meas. 50.00' Plot ter of Paving doe of Asphalt 49.93' Meas. 50.00' Plot 15.70 N 8918'57 W r29 OD.9y 9 $t1 A- - — Site - 49.93'-Meas.. S 50.00' Plat,iis° Cone Pod for Power Wetland 'A' 7.735 sq.ft. sY 50.00 `•t 49.9 Meas. Lot 19 Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 N 89'18'57' W 174.99' E VERTICAL DATUM ASSUMED \ \ Found Brass Disk W/Punah in Cons. in Case. 2/23/05 \ \ LES151...QESSEMIS LOTS 5,8 AND 7, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPEAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. BASIS OF BFARINO RECORD OF SURVEY AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20020610900013. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. (RCS) STEIN TOP BOLT ON HYDRANT, LOCATED 100 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S. 126th ST. AS SHOWN. ELEVATION 103.90 \ \ \ t. ' \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE g \ ..,Alllllll���llllllli�,. (DiPAT i laab '. 20 N. \ \ Found Brass Diet W/'X' in Cone in Case. 2/23/05 4 - GUY WIRE Z Q . ti © POWER VAULT �! to n O GAS METER o BOLLARD 1 D4 WATER VALVE o • ARE HYDRANT ® WATER METER v Q t3:6 • ID 1ELEPHONE IM ` `�� In at TELEPHONE RISER oC CABLE BOX tt LIGHT Me SIGNAL BOX a MAIL BOX w- SIGN • CATCH BASIN ® DRAIN III O SANITARY NH O MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED • REBAR AND CAP O IRON PIPE X PK NAIL Q HEDGE - ®� DEa0UCUS TREE - _ 9 ADER II11 =SWAM — STOP BAR MEM TRAVEL LAIN CIE - PUN LINK FENCE MICE - e - e-o-e. N000 FENCE AA-3 IEIIAAM FLAG Surveyor's Notes: 1. Survey performed by field traverse and Electronic Data Collection. 2. Using Topcon GTS 211D Total Station and HP -48GX Data Collection. 3. Closures exceeded the minimum requirements as established by WAC 332 - 130 -090. 4. This survey does not purport to show all easements of record or otherwise. 5. Property corners set, except as noted, represent deed locations. Ownership lines may be different. Obvious encroachments, if any, are shown. However no guarantee of ownership is expressed or implied. ueparuus c ur e.wn w•ow.p...c,.. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 4313670 FAX (206) 4314665 Earuail: tukplanitukwi1a wa.us BOUND ARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 1_0 (9' 035' DECLARATION Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owner(s) In fee simple of the land herein deserted do hereby make a boundary line adjustment The undersigned further declare this boundary toe adjustment to be the graphic representation of said boundary line adjustment and the same is made with the free consent and In accordance with the desire of the owner(s). In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals. Name: C-rA Name: A• • ii+vJWe Re STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King 1 On this day personally appeared before me Vfi i� F • Carrie° \ to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged ti i ` signed the same as hisge voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 15 day of , 20 24. o ��`` urit 4G � ��0 1 teL.O' Si gnature: CJ ,..:OTAg ••• ,,y carom Expires : = Name as commissioned: Floren•h nor Awla r - : Fe70 . l 22009 : � ff LL / Na,,o7a24 0: Title. /vvVa pb /,- , '0 , i,�' cure �,os My appointment expires: Q- /2/ ° STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me 4A an r7v 7 �1 to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that r7she signed the same asSiher voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. I GIVEN under my hand and official seal this / 54 day of J urh , 20 0(.r ` ���� E 4t1g1 44��i� Signature: • sf .sue °:�OTARj ��9 Name as commissioned: re, 7,1k � % 21- M Comm. Expires : - February 2, 2009 - ,g : No.107024 : ` Title: 9TF • ? UBU G : of WA N My appointment expires: of d /09 ��rrnnl +� Po* r1 P 61y� LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 13 gag_ gA Knit , registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that this plat is based on an actual survey of the land described hereby, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown hereon correctly; and that monuments other than those monuments approved for setting at a later date, have been set and lot corners staked on the ground as depicted on the plat. OLD DESCRIPTION LOTS 5, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT . THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. NEW DESCRIPTION I OT "A" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; ALL OF LOT 5, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 27.57 FEET OF LOT 6, BLOCK 9 RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH A INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. LOT "B" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. THE SOUTH 96.75 FEET OF LOTS 6 AND 7, EXCEPT THE EAST 27.57 FEET, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER AND SUBJECT TO A INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. LOT "C" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, ALL OF LOTS 6 AND 7 EXCEPT THE THE SOUTH 96.75 FEET AND THE EAST 27.57 FEET, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER AND SUBJECT TO A INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. AN INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT, FOR LOTS A,B & C DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 5, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 36, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THENCE N 89.18'57' W, A DISTANCE OF 92.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S 00.41'03" W, A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET, TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY 23.79 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46, TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 23.79 FEET THOUGHT A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ",TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT WITH SAID CURVE, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET, THENCE S. 00.41'03" W, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET. THENCE N 89.18'57" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET, THENCE N 00.41'03" E, A DISTANCE OF 54.00 FEET, THENCE S 89.18'57" E, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET, TO A BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 4.71 FEET, THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00 ", TO A BEGINNING OF A COMPCUND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST :HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 16.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 126.43'46", TO A BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 51.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 3,0.79 FEET THOUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26.43'46, TO A POINT THAT IS TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, THENCE N 00.41'03' E A DISTANCE OF 99.94 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS ON THE SOUTH MARGIN LINE OF SOUTH 126TH STREET, THENCE S 89.18'57' E, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION taxes are paid and that a deposit has been made in sufficient amount to pay the that th I certify that all prope taxes for the following delinquent special assess any of the property herein d This King County Treasurer Chairperson, Short Subdivision Committee are no riffled to this office for collection; and that all special assessments on as streets, alleys, or for other public use are paid In full 20 Deputy King County Treasurer KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved by the Department of Assessments this day of 1 A .t,tf))tt.07C , Nn lo le_ King County Assessor 14114;01M ALMA Deputy Assessor Parcel Number(s) TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this 27 day of Sv , 20 040 VICINITY MAP SURVEY IN SE 1/40F SW 1/4 OF SECTION 10 T. 23 N. R. 4 E. W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of the Cityof Trdc9Aathis 2100 day or A oM4t•. 2O s f, . ail"7 minutes past i eep M, and recorded In Vdume 295 of PIM. On page I e9 records of King County, Washington. r Kino County Manager owNER(g). AARON HUNDTOSTE & BRIE CAMPBELL ADDRESS: 3725 SOUTH 126TH STREET PHONE 206- 850 -5535 a pp. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 12415 9 DR SE BT SURVEYS 982TT 08425-344-6231 CHECKED BY DRAWN BY B.R. B.R. DATE 4 -10 -06 SCALE 1 " = 20' JOB NUMBER 2006003 SHEET 2 OF L1 500'41'03'W 99.94 Cl 26.43'46' AL 23.79 C2 26.43'46' AL 23.79 C3 90.00'00' AL 4.71 L2 56916 19.00 L3 500'41'03'W 54.00 L4 N8918'5rW 42.00 L5 N0 54.00 L6 58918'57 "E 2.00 C4 90.00'00' AL 4.71 C5 26.43'46' AL 16.79 C6 26.43'46' AL 30.79 L7 N00'41'03'E 99.94 0' City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southeenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98186 Telephone (206) 4314670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan(altukwlla.wa.us L Lot 8 R \, o ection 20' 40' SCALE: 1" = 20' Cn O 0 O O O N N � - N89'18'57 "W 149.80 n NEW PROPERTY L N( 7 30 OLD PL, MEAS. 49.93 (R.0 S.) N r7 N W O O O z U) N cn C1) W O O O z 60' • 40' WETLAND BUFFER LINE 15' INGRESS EGRESS AND UTILITY ESM'T • NEW LOT "C" • 8,911 SO. FEET 0.20 ACRES EXCLUDING ESM'T 7,052 SO. FEET 0.16 ACRES OLD (Lot 7) N89'18'57 "W NEW PROPERT NEW LOT "B" 6.995 SO. FEET 0.16 ACRES • 6 I O O O N N W O O O z W z J W 0 CC 0 z w w V) L6 C BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S. 126th St. OLD 72. LINE J PL, C2 J INGRESS W EG pry UTILITY O EASEMENT O O z L4 WETLAND FLAU A -5 MEAS. (I..O.S.) 150.00 PLAT NE PRORTY LINE 77.50 MEAS. 49.9.1 (R.O.S.) OLD PL, MEAS. 49.93 (R.O.S.) O N , O t) O N 1 N U7 N C)1 O ' W O o• N) N O N WETLAND r FLAG O O 92.00 NEW LOT "A" 17,050 SO. FEET 0.39 ACRES W Z I .J WETLAND et { WESTERLY EDGE FLAG A -3 W NV OF WETLANDS O (Lot 6) a Q\LD 2.3 . NEW • W z - >- L2 W El_ O d w z Lot 17 FP 0 ADDREss; 3725 S. 126TH STREET CITY/STATE2IP: TUKWILA, WA 98168 •OLD (Lot 5) WETLAND • FLAG A -2 • O D_ O O 0 N N NEW 29.3 • 1. ' V NEW PROPERTY LINE 72.30 - LTNEW PRrERTY LINE 77.50 Lot 15 " N89'18'57 "W 149.80 MEAS. (R.O.S.) I 150.00 PLAT Lot 16 Lot 18 OWNER(S): AARON HUNDTOSTE & BRIE CAMPBELL S89'18' 57 "E ti 174.99 O O CJ N Lot 1 WET LAND FLAG A -1 Lot 2 voc Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 19 B.R. B.R. BRASS DISK W /PUNCH, IN CONCRETE, IN CASE 03 03. \ • DATE 12415 9 DR SE B T SURVEYS EVERETT, WA 98208 425 - 344 -6231 4 -10 -06 SCALE 1 " = 20' I VOLUME PAGE BASIS OF BEARING RECORD OF SURVEY AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050603900014, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (ROS) REFERENCES: RECORD OF SURVEY, RECORDING No. 20020610900013. EASEMENT TABLE BRASS DISK W /X, IN CONCRETE, IN CASE NUMBER JOB 2006003 SHEET 2 OF 2 on of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Ce Rim 104.88 IE 12 Conc. E. 101.68 IE 12 Cone. W. 101.78 Lot 8 Lot 15 ›I N 89.15'57' W 0 r � ♦e San MH Rim 99.49 Floe/line E — N 88.57 Flowline W 88.57 enter of Paving dqe of Asphalt Zo7 Son MH Rim 98.42. 8 1 E97 . 08 Flowllne S — W 87.47 d gt • . 49.93'..Meas. �: u i^ .,..,_-7`,. _ 50.00' Plat ,. , .>a - - . �- - .':. .. Can. Pod • N -for Power Wetland 7.735 eq.ft. Concrete 1 Retaining vim 96` 03 Rim 103.31 IE 12- ABS E. 98.89 IE 12 ABS W. 98.92 89'18'57 ice" 9 S , o Lot 16 Lot 17 Rfrn DB 99.07 S. 126th St. IE 24' C. 90.85 IE 12 W. 95.04 W 97 09.97 • 104.28 Lot 18 W 0 Drain MH Rim 98.28 Flowline approx. elevation 91.50 (Unable to open) IE 91.39 94_ Lot I Lot 19 Lot 4 N 89'1 W 174.99' 8 BM Top Center Bolt of Hydrant Elevation 103.90 \ \ A ) „Tx \ \ \ Found Brass Disk W /Punch in Cone. In Case. 2/23/05 \ \ I FOAL OFS(:RIPTION LOTS 5,-8 A.r:J 7, BLOCK 9, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF PART OF RIVERSDE INTERURBAN TRACTS. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REC). Cr0 IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36. IN KING COUNT.. ....SHINGTON. • BASIS (IF RFeakt RECORD OF E•JrIVEY AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 200206109Cr I3. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. (ROS) VFR11CAL DAT ^1 ASSUMED SITE BM TOP BOLT ON HYDRANT, LOCATED 103 FcaT EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE ON Mi. ..: SIDE OF S. 126th ST. AS SHOWN. ELEVATION 1 J NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE a a - .,ilulllllllllUnlh,. (11x, T) link -20 R Found Brass Disk W/'X H Conc. in Casa 2/23/05 eD IE( ND x PDWER E— GUY MARE PDtE POWER VAULT O GAS METER o BOU.ARD De WATER VALVE .q FIRE HYDRANT IRI WATER METER @ TEEEPH19E MH aT TELEPHONE RISER ac CABLE BOX UGHT c4B SIGNAL BOX MAL BOX a SIGN ■ CATCH BASIN o DRAM MH CSI SANITARY MH o MONUMENT AS DESCRIB o REBAR AND CAP O RON PIPE X PK NAIL Q HEDGE • =AR e. OECOIIOUS 1REE - _ AR ® AU1ER � RGaaRr 1111 DI W ▪ S1i1P BAR LAIN EWE CRAAL CO ICRETE —e-0—e- OWN WE (DICE — .— . —. —.- rwE ASCE __ 1020 MICE ),7.-3 %E LMO FUG Surveyor's Notes: 1. Survey performed by field traverse and Electronic Data Collection. 2. Using Topcon GTS 211D Total Station and HP -48GX Data Collection. 3. Closures exceeded the minimum requirements as established by WAC 332 -130 -090. 4. This survey does not purport to show all easements of record or otherwise. 5. Property corners set, except as noted, represent deed locations. Ownership lines may be different. Obvious encroachments, if any, ore shown. However no guarantee of ownership is expressed or implied.