Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L05-007 - BARGHUSEN ENGINEERS / HOWITT JOEL - FUEL ISLAND CANOPY DESIGN REVIEW
ARCO AM /PM 15250 TUKWILA INTL BV L05 -007 ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Cifr of f Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO Joel Howitt, Barghausen Engineering, Applicant Artemio Cervantes Jr. for ARCO, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction All Parties of Record This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Project File Number: L05 =007 Applicant: Joel Howitt Barghausen Engineering for ARCO Type of Permit Applied for: Administrative Design Review Project _Description: Demolish an existing 1,408 sq. ft. fuel island canopy and replace it with a 3,584 sq. ft. fuel island canopy. The new canopy and fuel island will be reoriented on the site. Location: 15250 International Boulevard Associated Files: D04 -3386, building permit Comprehensive Plan Regional Commercial Designation /Zoning District: Regional Commercial NOTICE OF DECISION 1. PROJECT INFORMATION 1I. DECISION March 31, 2005 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: X determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. _ determined that the project, as proposed, does not require a threshold determination under SEPA because it qualifies as a planned action pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -172, that the probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the project were adequately analyzed in the EIS previously prepared for the planned action and will implement the conditions and mitigation measures imposed by the planned action approval. determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS), or 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Notice of Decision L05 -007: ARCO Canopy Replacement • • ❑ determined that the project does not create a probable significant environmental impact if specific mitigation conditions are imposed on the project and issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) requiring compliance with those mitigation conditions, or ❑ determined that the project creates a probable significant environmental impact and required preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for Administrative Design Review, L05 -007, does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. 1. Revise the landscaping plan as noted on the attached red -lined plan to: reduce the amount of groundcover and add shrubs at the southwest corner of the site (where the pedestrian connection was originally proposed); revise the plantings on the east side of the site to the south of the new dumpster enclosure; add plantings to the north of the existing dumpster enclosure; align tree plantings on Southcenter Blvd. to match the alignment on the Sound Transit site; and revise the type of tree used to be Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica `Marshall Seedless'). 2. Relocate the pedestrian connection to the area where the driveway is being closed. 3. Replace missing slats in chain link fencing and restore fencing where needed. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Planning Commission of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision. In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, Thursday, April 14, 2005. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. q:WRCO\Notice of Decision.doc IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING 2 2 Notice of Decision L05 -007: ARCO Canopy Replacement • • 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Planning Commission decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Devlopment City of Tukwila q:\ARCO\Notice of Decision.doc 3 3 • '‘\\ T-27 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN �/ r� n. 510051 10 TOM 1 • t 751f'Ui�l �_ _ 10y_ _ _R1 IQOPC PI ,, p aD 100 ,, , , ,1,,.,, Pacific Highway South (SR 1) -.0 Ls WM OMR DINER(. RORAS r/ 000. 0 NOW POI CST Or AMU macs \ l � T11d .� Ni] -.OD 901 00 1108 0O0I910 RUM CCOROTI PROPOSED CR1DI 901 aryplon PRa0o90 GRIDS OOOIal2 101 0110 1 00. COaSR 00000 100:10 swat 10 1100 MN WE 100 Cod 270 0001 S11 PROTECTOR INI DE E QINER CALttvEnt CD 20 0SE 01510 O 01006,E MW?. wu RIN1 Sm "D DAPPROVED PJSE •1 APPROVED 1Da10R. 0 O OOOSE A .00110.01 :mina nrt. own RIM Err we II011. ar SIM 2OE01Srs . OR 0050 PPPROYED OP/C1 N 0401170 amt 619E PRIOR 10 x1au5On/ww1D 2010 I. 0 1 1. N 001)1110CE 0 WITH CST OP 00 0 510100/05 sneco 1 0-50 0*00011 0130 MR= 00001 01.10 55.0410 M 0050 N OEEI® ICCm100 21 000 500.1[ 0/02 1011 E0 2 ELLWTORS ARE TO W Of 014100 MUSS 0000 WSD. Site Address: 15252 International Blvd. Parcel #: 004300 -0070 RECEIVED !JAN 2 7 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT `' ARCO '�Il1RT� BOAS 120 G/oba/Alliance whims Int mon gas.* lex ; cram roans L1 H a A sou enarkort ware. MOM 15263 PRd6o NNE. Bo. ® 16116 SEW ftskingEn EMI PAC 95610 •sizsa NNW SCE 92356 Surie riolgavilExT RAN MT be C1.1 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION . I. — J V ( v �� HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Project Number: L- Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice 0 -S (2 , A.-10674 _ Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action � �i Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Ak oF - -ec-8/67) Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3 / L d ay ofill�i n the year 20D5' P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: Project Number: L- ` e) 0 -S (2 , A.-10674 _ Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: � �i � � , ;t7 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3 / L d ay ofill�i n the year 20D5' P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ✓ j K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE— Noitz-A- 4, SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES e er i () KENT PLANNING DEPT f () TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: J .($PUBLIC WORKS O FIRE J O POLICE () FINANCE ., � I- () PLANNING () BUILDING I Iir - , , „f • O PARKS & REC. O MAYOR n�M �' O CITY CLERK () PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM () SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC CHECKUST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHOREUNE PERMIT MAILINGS • • a) 5 j n.l i, r Nh nu DoX c) 1,0- ("Oa- ( La- FEDERAL AGENCIES WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES UTIUTIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LO ME L AGENCIES IA ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ( ) HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR () K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES () FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC UBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT A OLYMPIC PIPELINE a _ VAL -WE SEWER DISTRICT — � () WATER DISTRICT #20 Na tic ,� p � ; WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT RENTON PLANNING DEPT ITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VWWV p., 1 e I- a tt e R btV eI cAt o f SQe.Tac_ t Urpr . o f PuW t 'C /ann r 1 v�ll R -( tr ot s . - SatA.C. , 5 r • 11 .tsco 5. 1 S StaToc. 4€ r 6 5_ eIVO SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant * Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice ofAppllcation for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). * Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\A DM [N] STRATIVE\FORMS\CHKLIST. DOC P•LIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR FlIMITS N ftLtio?v fir/aqua," vv'i Yo10 Lo 1 77 cACA lock 1-kow Tat% Ntwen c 215 - Zolc° kg. 5. V-ektr `"' og0 32_ N aT1ck O St 6,-- City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2599 Ms. Sue Comis, AICP Public Involvement Sound Transit Link Light Rail 401 S. Jackson St Seattle, WA 98104 Mr. Rod Kempkes, P.E. Tukwila Line Segment Manager Sound Transit Link Light Rail 401 S. Jackson St. Seattle, WA 98104 Mr. Artemio Cervant ARCO 4 Centerpointe La Palma, CA 90623 e/ Jr . ¶ — 1 - r. - OouSI R. s,.;dt✓ A5L/} I 4ewitt AvcEJior, I1 \ Vi n e 5L . Suetc 400 City of Tukwila Prepared March 28, 2005 Department of Community Development Stew Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW NOTIFICATION: Notice of Application mailed to applicant, agencies with jurisdiction February 8, 2005. FILE NUMBER: L05 -007 ASSOCIATED FILES: D004 -386 APPLICANT: Joel Howitt, Barghausen Engineering for ARCO REQUEST: Administrative design review approval to demolish an existing 1408 sq. ft. gas island canopy and replace with a new 3,584 sq. ft. canopy. The location of the new canopy will be reoriented on the site. LOCATION: 15250 International Boulevard COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Regional Commercial ZONING DISTRICT: Regional Commercial SEPA DETERMINATION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions STAFF CONTACT: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Applicant's Response to Design Review Criteria B: Site Plan and Building Elevations C. Revised Landscaping Plan Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Snuthcenter Boulevard_ Suite #100 6 Tukwila. Washington 98188 o Phone: 206= 431 -3670 • Fax: 206= 431 =3665 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 Vicinity /Site Information A. Project Description: Site improvements to the ARCO service station to include removal of the existing 1408 square foot fuel island canopy, all six fuel islands, existing fueling slab and asphalt paving to access underground fuel piping. The fuel canopy will be re- oriented on the site and replaced with a 3,584 square foot canopy, new fuel piping system vent piping and related equipment. B. Existing Development: The site is developed with an existing ARCO gas station and AM /PM mini -mart. C. Surrounding Land Use: The site is located on International Boulevard at the northeast corner of the intersection with Southcenter Boulevard. The new Sound Transit light rail station will be constructed across the street on the southeast corner. A self storage facility borders on the north and east of the property, however, this site will be redeveloped some time in the future to provide additional parking for the Sound Transit station. Commercial development is across the street in the City of SeaTac. D. Terrain: • • The site is almost 100% paved and flat. There is a grade change at the north and east ends of the property, which drops approximately 4 -6 feet in the area of the AM /PM Mini -Mart. The portion of the site on the west side of the Mini -Mart building contains a guardrail and ecology block to prevent vehicles from accidentally going over the edge of the slope. The guardrail will be replaced as part of the site upgrades. There is also a guardrail on the east side of the site to prevent cars from going over the edge. E. Vegetation: The site is completely developed, with existing landscaping that was installed when the gas station was constructed in 1989. No native vegetation remains. The existing landscaping is sparse and consists of shrubs -- no groundcover or trees. c: \mydocs \ARCO \AdmDR -staff rpt.doc FINDINGS 2 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 F. Public Facilities: DECISION CRITERIA • • The site is served by ValVue Sewer District and Water District #125. The proposed site construction will not affect either sewer or water service. Southcenter Boulevard is within the City of Tukwila; International Boulevard in this location is within the jurisdiction of the City of SeaTac. The applicant is proposing to close one of the two driveways on International Blvd., which will direct more traffic to the remaining driveways on Southcenter Blvd. /S. 154 Street and International Blvd. The project is subject to Administrative Design Review approval as required by TMC 18.26.070. In the following discussion, the design review criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. For the applicant's response to the criteria, please see Attachment A. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Response: The site is already completely developed, with minor redevelopment occurring on the property. The proposed project will remove the existing fuel island canopy, install a new canopy and re- orient the fuel island and the canopy that covers it. The canopy will double in size. The applicant is proposing to close the southern-most driveway that accesses the site from International Blvd. to improve the vehicle circulation on -site. The height of the canopy will not change. A pedestrian path will be constructed to connect the sidewalk to the site. The streetscape will soften as the on -site landscaping will be improved and street trees will be added to the International Blvd. right of way. 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony of texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; c: \mydocs \ARCO \AdmDR -staff rpt.doc 3 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 • • C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Response The adjoining property on the north and east is currently developed as a self storage facility. The site has been purchased and will be redeveloped by Sound Transit as supplemental parking for the transit station that will be constructed on the southeast corner of Southcenter Blvd. and International Blvd. Sidewalks abut the site on the south and west, but there is no pedestrian connection. Pathways have been worn through the landscaping from the sidewalks to the site. A paved pedestrian pathway will be constructed to provide a clearer access for pedestrians onto the property. The currently proposed location for the pedestrian connection would have linked the cross walk curb cut at International Blvd. and Southcenter Blvd. however this will not work as there are a number of utility fixtures in the way. An alternate connection will be required where the driveway is being closed. Loading and deliveries for the AM \PM Mini -Mart occurs on the eastside of the site, primarily away from the vehicles arriving to obtain fuel. Parking for the Mini -Mart is along the south side of the building. The fuel trucks will re- supply the gas station near the fueling islands. Landscaping is being added on the north and east sides of the site to complement the landscaping that will be planted on the new parking lot for the Sound Transit station. The front perimeter landscaping is being replaced with new landscaping that will include trees and groundcover on the south side. Currently the landscaping consists only of shrubs. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; 4 c: \mydocs \ARCO \AdmDR -staff rpt.doc Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 • • E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The current landscaping on the site was installed when the site was developed in 1989 and consists of shrubs with no groundcover or trees. The existing shrubs will be removed and replaced by new, fresh landscaping materials. At the time of the original development, only five feet of landscaping was provided. Trees will be added to the perimeter landscape area along Southcenter Blvd. /S. 154 Street, along with two rows of shrubs and groundcover to a depth of 10 feet. The revised landscaping plan shows the trees just off the property in the right -of -way, which will match with the location of the trees on the Sound Transit site. Street trees will be added along International Blvd. to comply with requirements of the City of SeaTac. The type of trees will match those being installed by Sound Transit on the south side of Southcenter Blvd. /S. 154 Street, Fraxinus Pennsylvanica `Marshall Seedless' Green Ash. The addition of the street trees will prevent the installation of trees in the landscaping strip on -site as there is not enough room for another row of trees behind the street trees. The revised landscape plan submitted on March 14, 2005 shows five feet of landscaping provided on the ARCO property with an additional five feet of landscaping provided in the right -of -way. The width being planted in the right - of -way must match the width being provided on the Sound Transit site to the east. The revised landscaping plan shows approximately 10 feet of ground cover in the area on either side of the proposed pedestrian connection. The amount of groundcover must be reduced and the amount of shrubs increased in this area. The pedestrian connection will be moved to the area where the driveway is being closed - a location that will not conflict with the existing street furniture and future widening of the intersection. c:Amydocs \ARCO \AdmDR -staff rpt.doc 5 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 • • An existing dumpster and its enclosure is located on the east side of the site. The enclosure is constructed of painted concrete blocks with a chain link fenced with slats gate across the front. A second dumpster has been added to the property in the same location — an enclosure will be constructed to screen the new dumpster from view. The enclosure will match the existing dumpster enclosure. A planting area will be added on the east side of the new dumpster. This landscape area will extend five feet beyond the property line. Fencing with green slats for screening is used around the eastern perimeter of the site and on the north side along the grade change. The fencing on the east side provides security to the rear of the building where deliveries are made. Some of the slats are missing and the fencing in places is sagging and misshapen. 4. Building Design. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: No new buildings will be constructed. The applicant is proposing to replace and re- orient the existing fuel island canopy with a new, larger canopy, which is being enlarged from 1408 sq. ft. to 3584 sq. ft. The existing building, an AM/PM Mini -Mart, is not being renovated or altered at this time. The fuel island canopy will be in scale with the site and the height is 17 ''A feet high with a clearance of 14 ''A feet. No site lighting will be moved, although lighting will be provided under the canopy. c:\mydocs\ARCO\AdmDR-staff rpt.doc 6 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 • • The canopy will include a logo on each side that symbolizes the ARCO company. A separate sign permit will be required for these logos. At that time, other signage on the site will be reviewed to determine compliance with the City's sign code. As a point of information, at this time there are too many signs on the AM /PM Mini -mart — additional signage on the fuel island canopy cannot be approved until other sign code violations are addressed on -site. 5. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: Not applicable. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: c:Amvdocs \ARCO \AdmDR -staff rpt.doc CONCLUSIONS The existing fuel island canopy is being replaced with a larger canopy and re- oriented on the property. The canopy size will double. The southern- most driveway on International Blvd. will be closed to improve on -site circulation. A pedestrian path will be constructed to connect the street sidewalk with the site. The current proposed location of the pedestrian connection conflicts with utilities and street furniture at the intersection. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: The adjoining property on the north and east has been purchased by Sound Transit for use as overflow parking for the Light Rail station that will be constructed on the southeast corner of 'International Blvd. and Southcenter Blvd/S. 154 Street. The landscaping on the ARCO site has been coordinated with the planting materials being used on the adjacent property. Deliveries to the AM /PM Mini -mart occur on the east side of the site. A pedestrian connection proposed for the southeast corner of the site will be relocated to the area where the driveway is being removed. 7 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 • • 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: The current landscaping was installed in 1989 when the site was originally developed and does not meet current landscaping code requirements. The existing landscaping will be removed and replaced with new planting materials, trees on the south side of the property, groundcover and street trees in the right of way on International Blvd. The planting materials have been coordinated with the materials being used on the Sound Transit site, particularly the street trees being used. Revisions must be made to reduce the amount of groundcover shown around the pedestrian connection location and increase the amount of shrubs. A second dumpster has been added to the site on the east side— an enclosure will be constructed to screen it from view. This new enclosure will use the same building materials as the existing one — painted concrete blocks with a slated chain link gate across the front. The perimeter fencing on the east and north sides is in need of repair in some locations. 4. Building Design: No changes are proposed to the existing building, the AM /PM Mini -mart at this time. The existing fuel island canopy is being removed and replaced with one that is double in size. The canopy is also being re- oriented on the site. No site lighting is being added or removed. Lighting will be provided under the canopy. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Administrative Design Review application subject to the following conditions: c: \mydocs \ARCO \AdmlR -staff rpt.doc 1. Revise the landscaping plan as noted on the attached red -lined plan to: reduce the amount of groundcover and add shrubs at the southwest corner of the site (where the pedestrian connection was originally proposed); revise the plantings on the east side of the site to the south of the new dumpster enclosure; add plantings to the north of the existing dumpster enclosure; align tree plantings on Southcenter Blvd. to match the alignment on the Sound Transit site; and revise the type of tree used to be Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica `Marshall Seedless'). 2. Relocate the pedestrian connection to the area where the driveway is being closed. 8 Staff Report to DCD Director ARCO Canopy Replacement L05 -007 • • 3. Replace missing slats in chain link fencing and restore fencing where needed. Information Item: Use of the ARCO logo on the canopy is considered signage. This signage is subject to a separate permit and cannot be approved until overall site signage issues on the AM /PM Mini -Mart are resolved. c: \mydocs \ARCO \AdmDR -staff rpt.doc 9 Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Brandon: • • CIVIL ENGINEERING. LANI) PLANNING, SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES January 27, 2005 HAND DELIVERY RE: Response to City of Tukwila Planning Division Comments and Administrative Design Review Application Development Permit Application D04 -386 ARCO AM/PM Facility Forecourt Remodel 15250 Tukwila - International Boulevard ARCO FAC No. 5515 / Our Job 2369.1 iJ gN 2 7 2005 0EvE i Nt "ejvr This letter serves as a response to the City's letter of Incomplete Application No. 2 dated December 9, 2004, requiring the ARCO AM/PM Facility Forecourt Remodel project to proceed through the City's Design Review process. We have enclosed the following information for your use and review: • One (1) completed application checklist • One (1) completed Administrative Design Review application form • One (1) check for $400 for the application fee. • One (1) reduced (8 1/2 by 11 -inch) set of construction drawings • Four (4) sets (24- by 36 -inch) of construction drawings • One (1) copy of the color elevation exhibit The following is an itemized, in italics, list with our responses to the City's Design Review criteria: CRITERIA FOR BAR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR (TMC 18.60.030 AND 18.60.060(C). Applies to all development in the Tukwila International Boulevard Corridor 1. Site Design a. Site Design Concept 1. Organize site design elements to provide an orderly and easily understood arrangement of building, landscaping, and circulation elements that support the functions of the site. Response: Demolition of the existing fueling island canopy, installation of the new canopy and closure of the southern most driveway along Pacific Highway South will serve to improve the orderliness of the site and increase circulation efficiency. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com ATTACHMENT A • • Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -2- January 27, 2005 b. Relationship to Street Front 1. Organize site design elements to create a distinct street edge, and minimize parking between structures and street. Response: The existing parking configuration will not be effected by this project; however, closure of the southern most access along Pacific Highway South will increase the distinctive street edge along the property frontage and the new fueling island canopy will be oriented to each street frontage. 2. Orient at least one building entry to a major public street. Response: The existing AM/PM convenience store is configured as such to provide uniform orientation to both Pacific Highway South and South 154th Street. The new fueling island canopy will also be oriented toward each street frontage. c. Street Corners 1. Emphasize the importance of street corners through building location, the provision of pedestrian access, special site features and /or landscape features. Response: As stated, the existing AM/PM convenience store is situated on site to emphasize both street frontages and primarily the street corner. Pedestrian access is provided along both street frontages. Closure of the existing southern most driveway along Pacific Highway South, will improve access efficiency and decrease automobile /pedestrian interaction. d. Continuity of Site with Adjacent Sites 1. Maintain visual and functional continuity between the proposed development and adjacent and neighboring properties through setbacks, building massing, circulation and landscaping, where appropriate. Response: The existing visual and functional continuity between the existing and adjacent properties will be maintained. New landscaping will be provided in place of the existing southern most driveway along Pacific Highway South and the orientation of the new fueling island canopy will increase efficiency of circulation while providing appropriate building massing. e. Shared Facilities 1. Incorporate opportunities for joint development of sites where there is potential for common building walls, shared driveways, landscaping, or other shared facilities. Response: The existing shared driveway along Pacific Highway South will be retained as part of this project. g. • • Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -3- January 27, 2005 f Site Design for Safety 1. Minimize conflicts between drivers and pedestrians through the siting of structures, location of circulation elements, landscape design, and placement of signs. Response: A significant reduction in conflicts between drivers and pedestrians will be established with the closure of the southern most driveway along Pacific Highway South. 2. Design and site structures to maximize site surveillance opportunities from buildings and public streets. Response: Existing site lines from the existing AM/PM convenience store to the fueling island area and adjacent street frontages will be maintained as part of this project. 3. Provide adequate lighting levels in all pedestrian areas, including building entries, along walkways, parking areas, and other public areas. Response: All existing perimeter lighting will be maintained on site. New under canopy lighting will be installed to serve the fueling island area and will provide additional light benefit for the existing AM/PM convenience store. 4. Design landscaping so that long term growth will not interfere with site lighting and surveillance. Response: The majority of the existing landscaping will be maintained on site as is. New landscape to be placed in the area of the closed driveway will be installed to match existing and will not conflict with existing site lines or site lighting. S. Use durable, high quality materials in site furnishings and features for ease of maintenance. Response: In an effort to reduce future maintenance of the proposed fueling island canopy, high quality metal structural materials will be utilized to prevent corrosion, increase structural integrity, and limit the necessity for frequent future painting. Siting and Screening of Service Areas 1. Minimize the visual and aural impacts of service areas such as loading docks, trash and recycling collection points, utility maintenance areas, etc., through site design, landscaping and screening. Response: No new areas reserved for loading docks, trash recycling collection points, utility maintenance areas, etc, are proposed as part of this project. Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -4- January 27, 2005 h. Natural Features and Sensitive Areas 1. Preserve natural features such as existing topography, significant trees or wooded areas, wetlands and /or watercourses and incorporate them into the overall site, where appropriate. Response: The project proposes to utilize existing grades. No natural features will be affected as part of this project. 2. Design and site structures on hillsides to minimize the visual and environmental impact of development in these locations. Response: Not applicable. 3. Employ site design techniques that take advantage of and/or enhance visual focal points along the corridor, where feasible. Response: No existing visual focal points will be affected as part of this project. i. Surface Stormwater Detention Facilities 1. Integrate water quality treatment techniques such as biofiltration swales and ponds with overall site design, where possible and appropriate. Response: All under - canopy water runoff will be conveyed to a new oil/water separator prior to release to the existing sanitary sewer system. j. Pedestrian Circulation 1. Provide paved pedestrian walkways that connect all buildings and entries of buildings within a site. Response: Not applicable. 2. Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the public sidewalk(s) to the main entry of developments; where a development fronts two streets, access must be provided from both streets. Response: Due to the automobile oriented nature of the facility, no new pedestrian walkways are proposed from the street frontages to the store entrance. 3. Provide pedestrian connections from the on -site pedestrian network to walkways on adjacent properties and to other off site destinations, where feasible. Response: Not applicable. • • • • Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -5- January 27, 2005 4. Support pedestrian movement between properties and from private property to public rights -of -way by providing facilities that traverse natural or man -made barriers, where appropriate. Response: Existing pedestrian connections between adjacent properties will be maintained and a new portion of sidewalk will be provided to match existing at the location of the closed driveway along Pacific Highway South. S. Provide direct pedestrian walkways from businesses in commercial areas to transit stops, and /or provide additional transit amenities, where appropriate and feasible. Response: Not applicable. There are no transit facilities onsite or along the property's frontage. k. Pedestrian Amenities 1. Incorporate pedestrian amenities in site design to increase the utility of the site and enhance the overall pedestrian environment in the corridor, where possible. Response: Closure of the driveway along Pacific Highway South in conjunction with new landscaping and extended sidewalk will increase the pedestrian utility of the site and enhance the overall pedestrian environment in the corridor. 1. Vehicular Circulation 1. Minimize conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Response: Closure of the existing southern most access along Pacific Highway South and replacement with landscaping and sidewalk will minimize conflicts between vehicle and pedestrian traffic. 2. Minimize the amount of space devoted to vehicular circulation by limiting access driveways; ensuring that internal site circulation is efficient; and/or taking advantage of opportunities for shared driveways. Response: The closure of the existing southern most driveway along Pacific Highway South minimizes the amount of space devoted to vehicular circulation and utilization of the existing shared driveway along Pacific Highway South will ensure that onsite circulation is efficient and opportunities for shared driveways are achieved. m. Parking 1. Minimize the amount of space devoted to parking by taking advantage of shared parking and/or methods for reducing parking demand, where possible. Response: No new parking is proposed as part of this project. • • Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -6- January 27, 2005 2. Building Design a. Architectural Concepts 1. Develop an architectural concept for structure(s) on the site that conveys a cohesive and consistent thematic or stylistic statement, and is responsive to the functional characteristics of the development. Response: The proposed fueling island canopy will be comprised of ARCO's standard color scheme that has been designed to relate thematically and stylistically to the existing AM/PM convenience store. 2. Ensure that development on sites with more than one structure employ similar or complementary architectural styles and /or are related in scale, form, color, and use of materials and/or detailing. Response: The proposed fueling island canopy will relate harmoniously with the existing AM/PM convenience store including appropriate scale and similar color scheme and details. b. Architectural Relationships 1. Provide for visual and functional continuity between the proposed development and adjacent and neighboring structures when these structures demonstrate an appropriate level of architectural quality. Response: The existing architectural continuity between the adjacent developments are inconsistent. The proposed fueling island canopy modification project will not increase the existing inconsistencies. 2. Reduce the apparent scale of large commercial buildings located in the Neighborhood Commercial Center district and located adjacent to residential districts. Response: Not applicable. c. Building Elements, Details, and Materials 1. Provide distinctive building corners at street intersections through the use of special architectural elements and detailing, and pedestrian- oriented features where possible (see definition of pedestrian friendly facade). Response: Not applicable. 2. Relate the design and scale of building elements and details to the building's overall form and massing. Response: Not applicable. Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -7- January 27, 2005 3. Employ architectural details that are appropriate to the architectural character of the building. Response: The metal fueling island canopy with ARCO's signature canopy fascia detail and spark logo are architecturally appropriate with the existing AM/PM convenience store. 4. Utilize durable, high quality building materials that contribute to the overall appearance, ease of maintenance, and longevity of the building. Response: In an effort to reduce future maintenance of the proposed fueling island canopy, high quality metal structural materials will be utilized to prevent corrosion, increase structural integrity, and limit the necessity for frequent future painting. 5. Integrate the design and placement of exterior lighting with the architectural design and materials. Response: No new perimeter lighting is proposed with this project. However, new under canopy lighting fixtures will be recessed within the canopy ceiling. d. Pedestrian - Oriented Features 1. Provide pedestrian friendly facades (see Definitions) on the ground floor of all buildings that face public streets and entry facades that face parking areas. Response: Not applicable. 2. Provide special treatment for large blank walls (see Definitions) that are visible from pedestrian walkways and parking areas. Response: Not applicable. 3. Enhance building entries through the use of weather protection, landscaping, pedestrian amenities and/or distinctive architectural features. Response: Not applicable. • • e. Mechanical Equipment 1. Locate and /or screen roof - mounted mechanical equipment to minimize visibility from public streets, building approaches, and adjacent properties. Response: There are no roof - mounted mechanical equipment associated with the fueling island canopy that is visible from the surrounding street network or adjacent properties. 2. Locate and/or screen utility meters and other ground level utility equipment to minimize visibility from the street. • • Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -8- January 27, 2005 Response: No new utility meters or ground level utility equipment is proposed as part of this project. 3. Landscape Design a. Landscape Design 1. Develop a landscape design concept that demonstrates a clear and appropriate aesthetic statement. Response: Proposed landscaping has been designed to coordinate with and enhance the existing landscaping onsite. Please see Sheet L -1 and L -2 for details. 2. Develop a landscape design concept that reinforces site design and fulfills the functional requirements of the development, including screening and buffering. Response: The new landscape proposed for the area of the closed driveway along Pacific Highway South will consist of low growing shrubs and will serve to screen vehicle headlights from the adjacent street network. 3. Ensure that the landscape design reinforces and complements plantings in the public right -of -way. Response: New landscaping has been designed to compliment the extensive landscaping existing in the public right -of -way along 154th Street and Pacific Highway South. b. Planting Design 1. Select plant materials that reinforce the landscape design concept, and are appropriate to their location in terms of hardiness, maintenance needs, and growth characteristics. Response: Selected landscape plant varieties have been chosen to correspond with existing plant types onsite. The existing plant materials consist of hardy low maintenance varieties. 2. Incorporate existing significant trees, wooded areas, and /or vegetation in the planting plan where they contribute to overall landscape design. Response: All existing landscaping will be retained as part of this project. 4. Signs a. Signage Concept 1. Provide signage that is integrated with the architectural concept in scale, detailing, use of color, materials, and placement. Response: No new signage is proposed as part of this application. However, ARCO's signature spark logo is proposed to be provided on each elevation of the canopy fascia. Please see Sheet CA2 -1 for details. • • Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -9- January 27, 2005 b. Sign Placement 1. Provide signage that is oriented to both pedestrians and motorists in design and placement. Response: All signage will be oriented to either motorists on the adjacent street network, in the case of the canopy signs, or to customers fueling vehicles, in the case of signage on the fueling island dispensers. 2. Provide adequate directional signage on site and building identification numbers that are legible from the street(s). Response: All building identification numbers will be legible from adjacent street network and no new directional signage is proposed as part of this project. 3. Integrate freestanding signs with the landscaping. Response: No new freestanding signs are proposed as part of this project. c. Sign Design 1. Consider both day- and night -time viewing in the design, placement, and lighting of signage. Response: No new signage is proposed as part of this project. 2. Provide durable, high quality materials and finishes for signage. Response: No new signage is proposed as part of this project. Consistency With Adopted Plans And Regulations (TMC 18.100.030) 5. Demonstrate the manner in which the proposal is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and regulations and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila's Development Regulations and other official laws, policies and objectives of the City of Tukwila. Response: The ARCO fueling facility is a self - service operation utilizing state of the art dispensers and fueling technology that meets and/or exceeds local, state, and federal requirements for fuel handling, storage, and delivery systems. The pump island layout is designed to be clean, open, and visible to the cashier's inside the store. The lighting and closed circuit TV's combined with exceptional visibility for the cashier's will give customers the security required to conduct business and use remote pay options at this facility. The project is consistent with the development standards prescribed for this property and will not be afforded special provisions not already afforded similar uses in the vicinity. The project will adhere to all Tukwila Zoning, Building and Development Standards as well as state and federal construction and operation guidelines for gasoline facilities. Brandon Miles City of Tukwila Department of Community Development • • -10- We understand that the enclosed information constitutes a complete Design Review Application package and we look forward to your prompt review and Design Review determination. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (425) 251 -6222. Sincerely, Joel A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/pj 2369c.051.doc enc: cc: Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Bruce K. Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. January 27, 2005 Ms. Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Spencer: Planning Division Comments: • • CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES April 14, 2005 HAND DELIVERY RE: Response to Comment Correction Letter No. 2 BP ARCO Gasoline Facility Forecourt Remodel 15250 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington City of Tukwila Development Application No. D04 -386 ARCO FAC No. 5515 / Our Job No. 2369.1 IAPR , _ f� 5 0 05 We have revised the plans and associated information for the project referenced above in accordance with you comment letter dated April 14, 2005. Enclosed for your distribution are four (4) sets of the revised construction sheets and four (4) copies of the traffic impact analysis addendum letter prepared by Transportation Engineers Northwest dated April 14, 2005. The following outline provides each of the City's comments in italics exactly as written along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed: 1. Revise the landscaping plan as noted on the attached red -lined plant to: reduce the amount of groundcover and add shrubs at the southwest corner of the site (where the pedestrian connection was originally proposed); revise the plantings on the east side of the site to the south of the new dumpster enclosure; add plantings to the north of the existing dumpster enclosure; align tree plantings on Southcenter Blvd. To match the alignment on the Sound Transit site; and revise the type of tree used to Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica "Marshall Seedless'). Response: The landscape plan has been revised to address and satisfy all of the above items. Please refer to Sheet L1 -1 for details. 2. Relocate the pedestrian connection to the area where the driveway is being closed. Response: The pedestrian connection has been relocated to the area where the driveway is being closed along International Boulevard. 3. Replace missing slats in chain link fencing and restore fencing where needed. Response: As required, the existing chain link fencing along the eastern property line of the site will be beautified and restored during construction. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com Ms. Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician City of Tukwila Public Works Department Comments: • • -2- April 14, 2005 A) The November 1, 2004, Traffic Impact Study prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest shall be revised and resubmitted to Public Works for review and approval. Here are the comments: I. Page 9, Planned Transportation Improvements: This report states that "there are no planned transportation improvement projects ....in the study area." The City and Sound Transit have been working to improve s 154th Street and its intersection with International Boulevard. This report must acknowledge the improvements proposed in the vicinity of this expansion project. Response: Comment Noted. Please refer to the attached traffic impact analysis amendment letter prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest dated April 14, 2005. 2. The e -mail from Brian Shelton, P.E., Public Works Sound Transit Project Manager, dated February 16, 2005, (see attached) indicates that s 154th Street will be widened to support the Sound Transit light station. The southerly access at this ARCO station site on International Boulevard within SeaTac City limits will be closed. The applicant needs to review the most current improvement plan prepared by the City and Sound Transit and to access how the closure of the driveway would impact on the traffic access patterns for the ARCO station site. Please note that the remaining driveway on International Boulevard will serve in the future as a joint driveway for ARCO and future Sound Transit parking lot. Response: Comment Noted. Please refer to the attached traffic impact analysis amendment letter prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest dated April 14, 2005. 3. The report should redistribute the access traffic with the S 154th Street driveway closure and recalculate the levels of service. The safety of vehicles accessing to and from Tukwila International Boulevard and S 154th Street driveways should be evaluated. Response: Comment Noted. Please refer to the attached traffic impact analysis amendment letter prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest dated April 14, 2005. B) Submit copy of driveway closure permit along International Blvd. for City of SeaTac. Response: We are currently procuring the Right -of -Way Use Permit from the City of SeaTac. We will forward a copy of the approved permit to your attention prior to Building Permit issuance. Ms. Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician City of Tukwila • • -3- April 14, 2005 C) Submit copy of King County Industrial Waste approval letter for connection to Val Vue Sewer District via an oil water separator. Response: The King County Industrial Waste and Val Vue Sewer District approval letters are attached for your use as required. We believe that the above responses together with the enclosed revised construction drawings address all of the City's comments and the Building Permit should be ready for issuance. Please distribute the enclosed information to the respective reviewers as soon as possible. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at this office immediately. Sincerely, el A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/ pj 2369c.063.doc enc: As Noted cc: (Msrearol.Lumb _-City=of Tukwila Ms. Joanna Spencer, City of Tukwila Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Bruce K. Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. April 13, 2005 Mr. Joel Howitt c/o Barghausen Engineers 18215 72 Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: CORRECTION LETTER #2 Development Permit Application Number D04 -386 ARCO AM/PM — 15250 Tukwila International Boulevard Dear Joel: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Public Works and Planning Departments. At this time, the Building and Fire Departments have no comrnents. Planning Department: Carol Lumb, at (206) 431 -3661, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Public Works Department: Joanna Spencer, at (206) 431 -2440, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 433 -7165. Sincerely, encl Stefania Spencer Permit Technician xc: File No. D04 -386 • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: April 4, 2005 PROJECT: ARCO AM/PM Minimart Expansion PERMIT NO: D04 -386 PLAN REVIEWER: \ Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. A) The November 1, 2004, Traffic Impact Study prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest shall be revised and resubmitted to Public Works for review and approval. Here are the comments: 1. Page 9, Planned Transportation Improvements: This report states that "there are no planned transportation improvement projects....in the study area." The City and Sound Transit have been working to improve S 154 Street and its intersection with International Boulevard. This report must acknowledge the improvements proposed in the vicinity of this expansion project. 2. The e -mail from Brian Shelton, P.E., Public Works Sound Transit Project Manager, dated February 16, 2005, (see attached) indicates that S 154 Street will be widened to support the Sound Transit light station. The southerly access at this ARCO station site on International Boulevard within SeaTac City limits will be closed. The applicant needs to review the most current improvement plan prepared by the City and Sound Transit and to access how the closure of the driveway would impact on the traffic access patterns for the ARCO station site. Please note that the remaining driveway on International Boulevard will serve in the future as a joint driveway for ARCO and future Sound Transit parking lot. 3. The report should redistribute the access traffic with the S 154 Street driveway closure and recalculate the levels of service. The safety of vehicles accessing to and from Tukwila International Boulevard and S 154 Street driveways should be evaluated. B) Submit copy of driveway closure permit along International Blvd. for City of SeaTac. C) Submit copy of King County Industrial Waste approval letter for connection to Val Vue Sewer District via an oil water separator. (P:Laurie Admin /Joanna /Comments D04 -386 040405) Jo na Spencer - AKUU AM /HM Minlm'" 1i Y From: Brian Shelton To: Joanna Spencer Date: 2/16/05 11:12AM Subject: ARCO AM /PM Minimart The project proposal includes closure of the southerly access on International Blvd. This closure will force trips to the other driveways which includes one on Southcenter Blvd. The turning movements at that driveway may be impacted by the future street improvements on Southcenter Blvd that call for 6 lanes at that driveway location; 2 lanes eastbound and 4 lanes westbound. The concern is whether eastbound turns to /from that driveway will be allowed after the street improvements. I suggest making the applicant aware of the possible impacts and request that Engineering review for safety considerations. I will provide you with a copy of the proposed Southcenter Blvd plan. CC: Bob Giberson .t 3cDo M n, 1 • • City of Tukwila PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: March 31, 2005 CONTACT: Joel Howitt, Barghausen Engineering RE: D04 -386, ARCO Fuel Island Canopy Replacement ADDRESS: 15250 International Blvd. This building permit received Administrative Design Review approval on March 31, 2005 for the fuel island canopy and landscaping plan. The building permit is approved with the conditions noted below, which were the conditions of approval for the Administrative Design Review, file # L05 -007. Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661 if you have any questions. 1. Revise the landscaping plan as noted on the attached red -lined plan to: reduce the amount of groundcover and add shrubs at the southwest corner of the site (where the pedestrian connection was originally proposed); revise the plantings on the east side of the site to the south of the new dumpster enclosure; add plantings to the north of the existing dumpster enclosure; align tree plantings on Southcenter Blvd. to match the alignment on the Sound Transit site; and revise the type of tree used to be Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica `Marshall Seedless'). 2. Relocate the pedestrian connection to the area where the driveway is being closed. 3. Replace missing slats in chain link fencing and restore fencing where needed. Information Item: Use of the ARCO logo on the canopy is considered signage. This signage is subject to a separate permit and cannot be approved until overall site signage issues on the AM/PM Mini -Mart are resolved. q:`.Genera112005 Memos1D05- 007.doc • V. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Ms. Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Spencer: • • CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING. SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES April 14, 2005 HAND DELIVERY RE: Response to Comment Correction Letter No. 2 BP ARCO Gasoline Facility Forecourt Remodel 15250 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington City of Tukwila Development Application No. D04 -386 ARCO FAC No. 5515 / Our Job No. 2369.1 We have revised the plans and associated information for the project referenced above in accordance with you comment letter dated April 14, 2005. Enclosed for your distribution are four (4) sets of the revised construction sheets and four (4) copies of the traffic impact analysis addendum letter prepared by Transportation Engineers Northwest dated April 14, 2005. The following outline provides each of the City's comments in italics exactly as written along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed: CORRECTION Planning Division Comments: L T R # RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 1 4 2005 PERMIT CENTER 1. Revise the landscaping plan as noted on the attached red -lined plant to: reduce the amount of groundcover and add shrubs at the southwest corner of the site (where the pedestrian connection was originally proposed); revise the plantings on the east side of the site to the south of the new dumpster enclosure; add plantings to the north of the existing dumpster enclosure; align tree plantings on Southcenter Blvd. To match the alignment on the Sound Transit site; and revise the type of tree used to Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica "Marshall Seedless'). Response: The landscape plan has been revised to address and satisfy all of the above items. Please refer to Sheet L1 -1 for details. 2. Relocate the pedestrian connection to the area where the driveway is being closed. Response: The pedestrian connection has been relocated to the area where the driveway is being closed along International Boulevard. 3. Replace missing slats in chain link fencing and restore fencing where needed. Response: As required, the existing chain link fencing along the eastern property line of the site will be beautified and restored during construction. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www harnhausan nnm to +3r4' Ms. Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician City of Tukwila Public Works Department Comments: • • -2- April 14, 2005 A) The November 1, 2004, Traffic Impact Study prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest shall be revised and resubmitted to Public Work for review and approval. Here are the comments: 1. Page 9, Planned Transportation Improvements: This report states that "there are no planned transportation improvement projects ....in the study area." The City and Sound Transit have been working to improve s 154th Street and its intersection with International Boulevard. This report must acknowledge the improvements proposed in the vicinity of this expansion project. Response: Comment Noted. Please refer to the attached traffic impact analysis amendment letter prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest dated April 14, 2005. 2. The e -mail from Brian Shelton, P.E., Public Works Sound Transit Project Manager, dated February 16, 2005, (see attached) indicates that s 154th Street will be widened to support the Sound Transit light station. The southerly access at this ARCO station site on International Boulevard within SeaTac City limits will be closed. The applicant needs to review the most current improvement plan prepared by the City and Sound Transit and to access how the closure of the driveway would impact on the traffic access patterns for the ARCO station site. Please note that the remaining driveway on International Boulevard will serve in the future as a joint driveway for ARCO and future Sound Transit parking lot. Response: Comment Noted. Please refer to the attached traffic impact analysis amendment letter prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest dated April 14, 2005. . 3. The report should redistribute the access traffic with the S 154th Street driveway closure and recalculate the levels of service. The safety of vehicles accessing to and from Tukwila International Boulevard and S 154th Street driveways should be evaluated. Response: Comment Noted. Please refer to the attached traffic impact analysis amendment letter prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest dated April 14, 2005. B) Submit copy of driveway closure permit along International Blvd. for City of SeaTac. Response: We are currently procuring the Right -of -Way Use Permit from the City of SeaTac. We will forward a copy of the approved permit to your attention prior to Building Permit issuance. Ms. Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician City of Tukwila • • -3- April 14, 2005 C) Submit copy of King County Industrial Waste approval letter for connection to Val Vue Sewer District via an oil water separator. Response: The King County Industrial Waste and Val Vue Sewer District approval letters are attached for your use as required. We believe that the above responses together with the enclosed revised construction drawings address all of the City's comments and the Building Permit should be ready for issuance. Please distribute the enclosed information to the respective reviewers as soon as possible. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at this office immediately. Sincerely, el A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/ pj 2369c.063.doc enc: As Noted cc: Ms. Carol Lumb, City of Tukwila Ms. Joanna Spencer, City of Tukwila Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Bruce K. Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. From: Carol Lumb To: Internet:jhowitt @barghausen.com Date: 4/12/05 6:14PM Subject: Fwd: ARCO Street Trees Hi Joel: I heard from Doug Snider this afternoon, an architect working on the Sound Transit project adjacent to the ARCO site. They have been following your project so that their work is coordinated with the ARCO project and vice versa. They have had to adjust the location of their trees along S. 154th /Southcenter Blvd. due to an electrical conduit they found, so I wanted to pass that information along to you so that your tree location can be similarly adjusted. Doug's e-mail gives the distance the ARCO trees should be placed from the ARCO property line. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Carol • • From: <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 4/12/05 5:21 PM Subject: ARCO Street Trees Carol: Per your request we suggest the following: • • Re Location of ARCO Street Trees adjacent to the International / Southcenter Boulevard intersection: Location of trees: Locate the trees along a line that is parallel to and 8' - 8" south of the ARCO property line. Notes: This location will place the ARCO street trees 3' - 6" behind the back of the future sidewalk. This will match the relative location of Sound Transit's street trees further east. We believe that the location suggested above will not involve conflicts with existing underground utilities; and we are monitoring proposed utilities to ensure they are not located along the above - mentioned Tine. We note that proposed Southcenter Boulevard Improvements locate a new street Tight at 42' +/- west of the westerly edge of the existing ARCO driveway onto Southcenter Boulevard. Hopefully, ARCO's landscape architect can locate trees at an appropriate distance from this light. Spacing of trees: Maintain the approximately 25 center -to- center spacing currently shown on the ARCO Landscape Plan The location of Sound Transit's street trees further east will be adjusted to match the 25 center -to- center spacing identified above. Re Provision of Additional Street Trees at the ARCO Frontage: Given CoT's interpretation of the ARCO trees as street trees and per your instruction, ST's Southcenter Boulevard Landscape Plans will not include street trees at the ARCO frontage. Thanks for your continuing assistance, Doug Notes: Douglas R. Snider, ASLA Senior Associate Hewitt Architects 119 Pine Street, Suite 400 Seattle WA 98101 -1513 From: <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 4/1/05 9:42AM Subject: ARCO / Southcenter Boulevard Improvements Question Carol: Re street trees at the ARCO frontage on Southcenter Boulevard: As follow -up to previous coordination regarding landscape improvements proposed by ARCO...are you now in a position to advise us which of the two following options should apply to this portion of Southcenter Boulevard: 1. The 4 trees shown on the ARCO Landscape Plan...along the Southcenter Boulevard property line...will serve as street trees and...therefore drawings of Southcenter Boulevard Improvements to be provided by Sound Transit should not include street trees in the right -of -way in this area. Or 2. The abovementioned 4 ARCO trees are not considered street trees and therefore drawings to be provided by Sound Transit should include street trees in the right -of -way in this area. Doug Douglas R. Snider, ASLA Senior Associate Hewitt Architects 119 Pine Street, Suite 400 Seattle WA 98101 -1513 p: 206.624.8154 f: 206.626.0541 e: dsnider @hewittarchitects.com • • CC: <ab @nakanoassociates.com >, <jy @nakanoassociates.com >, <ballg @soundtransit.org> • Cizy of Tukwila • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: March 31, 2005 CONTACT: Joel Howitt, Barghausen Engineering RE: D04 -386, ARCO Fuel Island Canopy Replacement ADDRESS: 15250 International Blvd. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor This building permit received Administrative Design Review approval on March 31, 2005 for the fuel island canopy and landscaping plan. The building permit is approved with the conditions noted below, which were the conditions of approval for the Administrative Design Review, file # L05 -007. Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661 if you have any questions. 1. Revise the landscaping plan as noted on the attached red -lined plan to: reduce the amount of groundcover and add shrubs at the southwest corner of the site (where the pedestrian connection was originally proposed); revise the plantings on the east side of the site to the south of the new dumpster enclosure; add plantings to the north of the existing dumpster enclosure; align tree plantings on Southcenter Blvd. to match the alignment on the Sound Transit site; and revise the type of tree used to be Green Ash (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica `Marshall Seedless'). 2. Relocate the pedestrian connection to the area where the driveway is being closed. 3. Replace missing slats in chain link fencing and restore fencing where needed. Information Itern: Use of the ARCO logo on the canopy is considered signage. This signage is subject to a separate permit and cannot be approved until overall site signage issues on the AM /PM Mini -Mart are resolved. q: \General \2005 Memo 05- 007;doc 10`I-- 3 8(o - z.aoc. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard:SUite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 From: "Joel Howitt" <Jhowitt @barghausen.com> To: "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/30/05 10:18AM Subject: RE: Tukwila ARCO- Landscape Plan (BCE #2369) Carol, The new trash enclosure will be constructed of CMU painted to match the AM /PM store and a solid metal corrugated gate. Please refer to the attached detail. Let me know if you have any other questions. Joel Joel Howitt Project Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72nd Ave. S. Kent, WA 98032 DID: (425) 656 -1073 GEN: (425) 251 -6222 FAX: (425) 251 -8782 MOB: (206) 255 -4796 Original Message - From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:55 PM To: jhowitt Subject: RE: Landscape Plan • • Joel: I forgot to ask you when we talked earlier, what materials will be used to construct the second dumpster enclosure? I don't recall seeing anything in the materials that describes this. Thanks. carol »> "Joel Howitt" <Jhowitt@barghausen.com> 03/29/05 02:42PM »> Yes, please contact me at the numbers below: Joel Howitt Project Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72nd Ave. S. Kent, WA 98032 DID: (425) 656 -1073 GEN: (425) 251 -6222 FAX: (425) 251 -8782 MOB: (206) 255 -4796 Original Message••--- - From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 2:38 PM To: jhowitt Subject: RE: Landscape Plan Hi Joel: I am on my way from one meeting to another, but will give you a call later this afternoon to discuss the ARCO project. I did talk with Art, also with a Jonathan Finegan last week about where we are in the approval process. Will you be available later today (after 4:00)? Thanks. Carol »> "Joel Howitt" <Jhowitt@barghausen.com> 03/28/05 04:09PM »> Carol, I understand you spoke to Art Seidel from our office regarding your concerns about the landscaping proposed on site. Do you have any other questions or need any additional information to issue your staff report and decision? Joel Howitt Project Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72nd Ave. S. Kent, WA 98032 DID: (425) 656 -1073 GEN: (425) 251 -6222 FAX: (425) 251 -8782 MOB: (206) 255 -4796 Original Message From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:07 PM To: jhowitt Subject: Landscape Plan Hi Joel: I got the revised landscape plan this afternoon. I wanted to check with you on a couple items. What does the notation "No ground cover under shrubs mass typical" mean? Are there currently two types of shrubs along International Blvd and 154th or is your client adding a row? I can't remember from my site visits quite what is there. It also looks like there are plantings proposed in the ROW along both 154th and International Blvd. Can you confirm the location of the plantings? Thanks much. Carol CC: "David Carroll" <dcarroll @barghausen.com >, "File" <file @barghausen.com> From: <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/28/05 7:13PM Subject: Revised ARCO Landscape Plan / Supplemental information Carol: As it might affect your ongoing review of proposed ARCO improvements and as discussed by phone, a rough and very much provisional sketch of a proposed lengthening of the buffer to be located on the south side of the NW entry/exit drive to the Sound Transit Parking Lot is attached for your information. As discussed, the intention of the proposed lengthening of the buffer is to assist in clarifying / disciplining turning movements employed by ARCO and /or Sound Transit patron vehicles in the vicinity of the existing curb -cut onto International Boulevard. «154th Street North parking Lot -NW Entry Driveway Alt No. 1- 031705. pdf» Doug Douglas R. Snider, ASLA Senior Associate Hewitt Architects 119 Pine Street, Suite 400 Seattle WA 98101 -1513 p: 206.624.8154 f: 206.626.0541 e: dsnider @hewittarchitects.com CC: <ballg @soundtransit.org> 1 • • • From: <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/28/05 6:51 PM Subject: Revised ARCO Landscape Plan / Comments and Suggestions Carol: Per your request, our comments and suggestions with regard to the revised ARCO Landscape Plan L1 -1 (received at CoT on 3/14/05) are as follows: 1. International Boulevard Frontage: No comment other than to concur with the idea of converting the ARCO - proposed maples to the Marshall Seedless Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Marshall Seedless') to be employed by Sound Transit in this general vicinity. 2. Northerly Property Line: We note that ARCO proposes a plant vocabulary similar to that employed by Sound Transit in this area and suggest that as our planting plans progress, we will adjust them to work with planting shown on the ARCO plan. Specifically, we will adjust as required to avoid locational conflicts between trees and /or to "smooth out" the overall composition. 3. Easterly Property Line: We note that the area north of the ARCO dumpster enclosure is not landscaped and suggest the following: A. Area north of the ARCO dumpster enclosure: Include a row of mixed Emerald Arborvitae and Hinoki False Cypress along the ARCO side of the retaining wall to screen the back side of the existing ARCO building and to supplement the similar mixed row of Arborvitae and False Cypress proposed on the Sound Transit side of the retaining wall. B. Area south of the ARCO dumpster enclosure: Replace the ARCO - proposed Columnarbroad Maple and Compact Oregon Grape with Emerald Arborvitae to work with the simple row of mixed Emerald Arborvitae and Hinoki False Cypress employed along the entire westerly edge of the Sound Transit Parking Lot. Where sight -lines dictate, employ Rosa rugosa similar to that used on the Sound Transit side of the property line. 4. Southerly Property Line: We concur with the choice of Otto Luyken Laurel proposed on the right -of -way side of the property line and concur with the idea of replacing the ARCO - proposed maples with the Marshall Seedless Green Ash to be employed by Sound Transit in this general vicinity. We also note that the back of the future Southcenter Boulevard sidewalk will lie approximately 12 feet south of the property line and suggest that, given proximity to the intersection, there may not be space for both the abovementioned trees and additional street trees along this frontage of the ARCO site. We also wonder if you might be concerned with the interim appearance of the area shown as "Existing Landscaping" located in the right -of -way between ARCO - proposed landscaping and the existing Southcenter Boulevard curb. 5. Southcenter Boulevard / International Boulevard Intersection: To avoid a potentially untreated area in the zone lying between currently proposed ARCO landscape improvements and future right -of -way landscape improvements ...we suggest expanding the area of ARCO - proposed Otto Luyken Laurel, Rugosa Rose and Kinnikinnick to fill the area (currently shown as "Existing Landscape ") that is located between ARCO - proposed landscaping and the property line adjacent to the Southcenter Boulevard / International Boulevard intersection. Doug Douglas R. Snider, ASLA Senior Associate Hewitt Architects 119 Pine Street, Suite 400 Seattle WA 98101 -1513 p: 206.624.8154 f: 206.626.0541 e: dsnider @hewittarchitects.com • • CC: <jy @nakanoassociates.com >, <ab @nakanoassociates.com >, <ballg @soundtransit.org> • • From: <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> To: <clumb@ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/28/05 12:58PM Subject: RE: ARCO Landscape Planting Plan Carol: Thanks for your input. still have a question as to your response No. 3 below. Correct to understand that: A. Trees proposed by ARCO, on private property, along Southcenter Blvd are being required to bring on -site development into compliance with your landscaping code...and...these trees are not considered "street trees" per se; and B. The City of Tukwila is not requiring ARCO to provide street trees...in the right -of- way...along the Southcenter Boulevard frontage; and C. Drawings we are preparing for Sound Transit...to show landscape improvements in the Southcenter Boulevard right -of -way along the ARCO frontage...should therefore include additional, street trees, as previously indicated by Brian Shelton? Also our Landscape Architects have promised me their comments by mid - afternoon today. Accordingly, you should see our suggestions by the End of Business today. Doug Original Message From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:22 PM To: Doug Snider Subject: Re: ARCO Landscape Planting Plan Doug: Hi there - Re: your questions: 1. on the east, the side yard landscaping will be as shown on the revised landscaping plans - no landscaping in the area where the dumpsters are located. We may have them revise some of the plant types - I'II be talking that over with my supervisor tomorrow. 2.You are correct about the problems with the location of the pedestrian connection - we are looking at a better location for it, possible in the area where they are closing off the driveway entrance. 3. The type of street trees will be revised to match those that Sound Transit is using - Green Ash rather than what is shown on the revised landscaping plans. These trees will be used both on International Blvd. and on Southcenter Blvd. The trees on Southcenter Blvd will be located on private property as part of upgrading the site's landscaping to comply with our landscaping code. The trees on International Blvd. are being required by SeaTac and will be located in the ROW. Carol: • • That won't leave room for additional trees on the private property side. 4. If your landscape folks have any comments I must have them by Tuesday a.m. 9:00 at the latest. thanks. Carol »> <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> 03/21/05 05:04PM »> Greg: Re ARCO Landscape Improvements: Per your request, I have contacted Carol Lumb at the CoT. As a result of our phone conversation, Carol sent me copies of ARCO's recently revised Landscape Plan and related correspondence with the proviso that I send same to you. Accordingly, relevant PDFs are attached for your information / files. Thank you for the abovementioned materials. A couple of questions if I might: 1. Side Yard Landscaping: Is it correct to understand that ARCO will not be required to provide side -yard landscaping at those portions of the easterly property line currently shown not- to -be- planted in their revised Drawing L1 -1? 2. New Concrete Sidewalk connecting ARCO site to International Blvd / Southcenter Blvd Intersection: Correct to assume you are aware that: a) the proposed alignment of the path shown on Drawing L1 -1 passes very near to, if not "through ", the City of Tukwila "Entry Sign" that occurs in the RoW in NE quadrant of the International Blvd / Southcenter Blvd intersection; and b) the precise location of this sign will be adjusted during the course of the design of Improvements to Southcenter Boulevard? 3) Street Trees at the ARCO frontage on Southcenter Boulevard: Are the (2) Columnarbroad Maples and (2) Norwegian Sunset Maples shown along the southerly property line on ARCO Drawing L1 -1 intended to address CoT street tree requirements for Southcenter Boulevard...or...are they being provided in addition to the street trees Brian Shelton requested (i.e. "Add street trees on north side Southcenter Blvd from International Blvd to ARCO driveway ") in his "C759 Review Comments" attached to his 2/28/05 E -mail to Rod Kempkes at Sound Transit? If the former...can ARCO's proposed maples be converted to the Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Marshall Seedless') that are currently planned for both sides of the Southcenter Boulevard RoW in the vicinity of the 154th Street Station and the 154th Street North Surface Parking Lot? (Jim / Audrey: correct to understand we are still using Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Marshall Seedless' at these locations ?) 4) Other: The questions below are posed to our Landscape Architects. Assuming they would like to make suggestions such as those alluded to below regarding the ARCO landscape plan ...when do you need such input? Jim / Audrey: Carol Lumb (Sr. Planner at CoT) has asked us if we might have comments on planting indicated in the attached ARCO Planting Plan L1 -1. Questions if I might: 1. Landscape at northerly Property line: I assume you agree with ARCO's similar use of Hinoki False Cypress and Rubus pentalobus in this area? Any "objection" to the addition of Vine Maples? Are you okay with the quantity and /or locations of the Hinoki False Cypress and Vine Maple shown in this area...vis- a- vis... "crowding out" or "upstaging" the formal gesture formed by your proposed rows of Chanticleer Pears along the NW driveway ?; any reason to suggest something other than the Rugosa Rose and Oregon Grape also proposed in this area? 2. Landscape at westerly Property line: Is the combination of (2) Columnarbroad Maples and (2) Norwegian Sunset Maples shown on in the RoW at the International Boulevard frontage what you would expect to see...given your conversations with City of SeaTac...and...in the light of what you are providing along International Boulevard in areas south of Southcenter Boulevard? 3. Landscape at southerly Property line: Given your thoughts as to shrubs you intend to include in the Southcenter Boulevard RoW at the North Parking Lot and ARCO frontages...any reason to suggest something other than the row of "Otto Luyken" Laurel proposed at this location on the ARCO drawing? 4. Landscape at Property line in SE corner of ARCO site: Given your consistent use of Hinoki False Cypress and Emerald Arborvitae along the whole westerly edge of the North Parking Lot...do you think there is wisdom in suggesting substitution of those plants for the Columnarbroad Maple and Oregon Grapes currently shown in this area of the ARCO plan? Thanks to all «ARCO Landscape Plan - NoDate- 032105.pdf» «ARCO Landscape Correspodence -Marl 3- Mar9- Mar9 - Mar9 - Feb25 - Feb25. pdf» Doug Douglas R. Snider, ASLA Senior Associate Hewitt Architects 119 Pine Street, Suite 400 Seattle WA 98101 -1513 p: 206.624.8154 f: 206.626.0541 e: dsnider @hewittarchitects.com • • CC: <jy @nakanoassociates.com >, <ab @nakanoassociates.com> Mr. Dixie Hallenberger, P.E. Engineering Technician Supervisor 4800 S. 188th St. SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 dhallenberger @ci.seatac.wa.us 206 - 973 -4734 (Direct & Voice Mail) 206 - 973 -4730 (Engineering Division) 206 - 973 -4769 (FAX) From: "Dixie Hallenberger" <dhallenberger @ci.seatac.wa.us> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/25/05 4:33PM Subject: Re: ARCO Canopy Replacement Hi Carol, • • That location is probably okay, so long as it doesn't look like a vehicle access point. I'll have our folks hold off on issuing the r/w use permit until I get the okay from you that Tukwila has approved the plans. »> "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> 03/25/05 4:26:39 PM »> Hi Dixie: I've been talking with Brian Shelton and Joanna Spencer about the landscaping for the International Blvd. segment. I didn't realize that Sound Transit is using Green Ash across the street on International Blvd, so I'm going to require the ARCO use these same trees both on S. 154th /Southcenter Blvd. and also on their portion of International Blvd. if that is ok with you. Also, Joanna noticed that the pedestrian connection can't go where Barghausen is proposing due to a pedestrian crossing signal pole, 3 traffic signal vault lids, the existing irrigation system, AT &T fiber optic marker etc. already being located in the same area. So I'm looking for an alternate location. Do you have a problem with it being moved perhaps to where the driveway is being closed off? I don't know if this will help redirect any of the foot traffic that is currently cutting through the shrubs, but that's what I'm hoping for. Thanks for your thoughts. Hope you have a good weekend. Carol CC: "Cal Smith" <csmith @ci.seatac.wa.us >, "Florendo Cabudol" <fcabudol @ci.seatac.wa.us >, "Jack Dodge" <jdodge @ci.seatac.wa.us >, "Lena Kuliczkowska" <Iuliczkowska @ci.seatac.wa. us> From: <DSnider @HewittArchitects.com> To: <ballg @soundtransit.org >, <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, <jy @nakanoassociates.com> Date: 3/21/05 5:06PM Subject: ARCO Landscape Planting Plan Greg: Re ARCO Landscape Improvements: Per your request, I have contacted Carol Lumb at the CoT. As a result of our phone conversation, Carol sent me copies of ARCO's recently revised Landscape Plan and related correspondence with the proviso that I send same to you. Accordingly, relevant PDFs are attached for your information / files. Carol: • • Thank you for the abovementioned materials. A couple of questions if I might: 1. Side Yard Landscaping: Is it correct to understand that ARCO will not be required to provide side -yard landscaping at those portions of the easterly property line currently shown not- to -be- planted in their revised Drawing L1 -1? 2. New Concrete Sidewalk connecting ARCO site to International Blvd / Southcenter Blvd Intersection: Correct to assume you are aware that: a) the proposed alignment of the path shown on Drawing L1 -1 passes very near to, if not "through ", the City of Tukwila "Entry Sign" that occurs in the RoW in NE quadrant of the International Blvd / Southcenter Blvd intersection; and b) the precise location of this sign will be adjusted during the course of the design of Improvements to Southcenter Boulevard? 3) Street Trees at the ARCO frontage on Southcenter Boulevard: Are the (2) Columnarbroad Maples and (2) Norwegian Sunset Maples shown along the southerly property line on ARCO Drawing L1 -1 intended to address CoT street tree requirements for Southcenter Boulevard...or...are they being provided in addition to the street trees Brian Shelton requested (i.e. "Add street trees on north side Southcenter Blvd from International Blvd to ARCO driveway ") in his "C759 Review Comments" attached to his 2/28/05 E -mail to Rod Kempkes at Sound Transit? If the former...can ARCO's proposed maples be converted to the Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Marshall Seedless') that are currently planned for both sides of the Southcenter Boulevard RoW in the vicinity of the 154th Street Station and the 154th Street North Surface Parking Lot? (Jim / Audrey: correct to understand we are still using Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Marshall Seedless' at these locations ?) 4) Other: The questions below are posed to our Landscape Architects. Assuming they would like to make suggestions such as those alluded to below regarding the ARCO landscape plan ...when do you need such input? Jim / Audrey: Carol Lumb (Sr. Planner at CoT) has asked us if we might have comments on planting indicated in the attached ARCO Planting Plan L1 -1. Questions if I might: 1. Landscape at northerly Property line: I assume you agree with ARCO's similar use of Hinoki False Cypress and Rubus pentalobus in this area? Any "objection" to the addition of Vine Maples? Are you okay with the quantity and /or locations of the Hinoki False Cypress and Vine Maple shown in this area...vis- a- vis... "crowding out" or "upstaging" the formal gesture formed by your proposed rows of Chanticleer Pears along the NW driveway ?; any reason to suggest something other than the Rugosa Rose and Oregon Grape also proposed in this area? 2. Landscape at westerly Property line: Is the combination of (2) Columnarbroad Maples and (2) Norwegian Sunset Maples shown on in the RoW at the International Boulevard frontage what you would expect to see...given your conversations with City of SeaTac...and...in the light of what you are providing along International Boulevard in areas south of Southcenter Boulevard? 3. Landscape at southerly Property line: Given your thoughts as to shrubs you intend to include in the Southcenter Boulevard RoW at the North Parking Lot and ARCO frontages...any reason to suggest something other than the row of "Otto Luyken" Laurel proposed at this location on the ARCO drawing? 4. Landscape at Property line in SE corner of ARCO site: Given your consistent use of Hinoki False Cypress and Emerald Arborvitae along the whole westerly edge of the North Parking Lot...do you think there is wisdom in suggesting substitution of those plants for the Columnarbroad Maple and Oregon Grapes currently shown in this area of the ARCO plan? Thanks to all «ARCO Landscape Plan - NoDate- 032105.pdf» «ARCO Landscape Correspodence - Marl 3- Mar9 -Mar9- Mar9 - Feb25 - Feb25. pdf» Doug Douglas R. Snider, ASLA Senior Associate Hewitt Architects 119 Pine Street, Suite 400 Seattle WA 98101 -1513 p: 206.624.8154 f: 206.626.0541 e: dsnider @hewittarchitects.com CC: <ab @nakanoassociates.com> • • From: "Joel Howitt" <Jhowitt @barghausen.com> To: "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/15/05 11:46AM Subject: Tukwila ARCO Expansion Landscape Plan (BCE #2369.1) Carol, Thanks for looking at the plans so quickly! The notation of no ground cover under the shrubs along International Blvd. and Southcenter Blvd. is accurate. This area is intended for the new shrubbery to fill in completely. The groundcover will then be planted to create a second layer and define the shrubbery mass better. We've learned that planting the groundcover underneath the shrubbery often times leads to unsuccessful groundcover life and results in the situation that exists on site presently. Our intent is to remove all of the existing shrubbery along the street frontages and replace with 2 varieties of new healthy shrubbery, groundcover and trees to a depth of at least 10 feet along Southcenter Blvd. and approximately 15 feet along International Blvd. as indicated on the planting schedule. Some of the planting will be located within the ROW as indicated along both frontages. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks, Joel < > Joel Howitt Project Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72nd Ave. S. Kent, WA 98032 DID: (425) 656 -1073 GEN: (425) 251 -6222 FAX: (425) 251 -8782 MOB: (206) 255 -4796 Original Message From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:07 PM To: jhowitt Subject: Landscape Plan Thanks much. Carol • • Hi Joel: I got the revised landscape plan this afternoon. I wanted to check with you on a couple items. What does the notation No ground cover under shrubs mass typical" mean? Are there currently two types of shrubs along International Blvd and 154th or is your client adding a row? I can't remember from my site visits quite what is there. It also looks like there are plantings proposed in the ROW along both 154th and International Blvd. Can you confirm the location of the plantings? • • CC: "David Carroll" <dcarroll @barghausen.com >, "File" <file @barghausen.com >, "aseidel" <aseidel @barghausen.com> • • n " u March 14 2005 MAR 1 4 7,, S ys 4141r e2 HAND DELIVERY !�� <y) CUl�:cv:u ' G ENG�N44' DEVELOPMENT Carol Lumb City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Revised Landscape Plan BP /ARCO Gasoline Facility Forecourt Remodel City of Tukwila File No. L05 -007 15252 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington ARCO FAC No. 5515 / Our Job No. 2369.1 Dear Carol: CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAN D PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Enclosed for your review and distribution are four (4) sets of the revised Landscape Planting Plan. The plan has been revised in accordance with our telephone discussion on March 11, 2005, to show the following changes: 1. A new landscape planter has been added along the eastern property line near the Tukwila Boulevard access and driveway. 2. Onsite perimeter landscaping is being provided at a minimum 10 -foot depth consisting of groundcover, shrubbery, and trees in accordance with City of Tukwila landscape code standards. 3. Additional on -site landscaping comprised of groundcover and shrubbery, is being provided along International Boulevard. We understand that the revisions made to the enclosed Landscape Planting Plan will address all of your comments. We look forward to receiving your staff report and design review decision for this project in the near future. In the meantime should you have any questions or comments or require any additional information, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Joel A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/pj [2369c.061.doc] enc: As Noted cc: Dixie Hallenberger, City of SeaTac (w /enc) Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Bruce K. Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. F. Al Kendall, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com 1 j am .; . 2 .I 's \_ __ y . <r, Ng ENG'NF' Carol Lumb City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Carol: City of Tukwila Comments • • CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAN D PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES March 9, 2005 HAND DELIVERY RECEIVED CITY OF TULSA RE: Responses to February 25, 2005 Design Review Letter MAR 1 0 2005 BP /ARCO Gasoline Facility Forecourt Remodel City of Tukwila File No. L05 -007 PfA+11 eENT 15252 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington ARCO FAC No. 5515 / Our Job No. 2369.1 We have revised the conceptual site plan and landscape drawings for the above - referenced project in accordance with your comment letter dated February 25, 2005. Enclosed for your review and approval are four sets of the revised plans. The following outline provides each of your comments in italics exactly as written, along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed: 1. International Boulevard along the ARCO site is within both the City of SeaTac jurisdiction as well as the State Department of Transportation — not the City of Tukwila. You will need permits from jurisdictions for working in their right -of -way to remove the southern driveway. Mr. Dixie Hallenberger is the contact at the City of SeaTac. He can be reached at 206 - 973 -4734. The street name should be corrected on the plans to International Blvd. — rather than the former name of Pacific Highway South. A copy of comments received from the City of SeaTac are enclosed. Response: As requested, we have contacted the City of SeaTac regarding the required Right -of -Way Use Permit for the driveway closure and frontage improvement portions of the project. We are currently submitting Right -of -Way Use Permit application documents to the City of SeaTac for approval and will forward copies of the approved permit to your attention when received. According to conversations with Dixie Hallenberger at the City of SeaTac, no additional Right -of -Way Use Permit will be required from the Washington State Department of Transportation. 2. Sheet C1 -1 identifies tank vents in the Southcenter Blvd. Right -of -way. The tank vents are not permitted to be located in the Southcenter Blvd. right -of -way. Also, a note on Sheet C1 -1 refers to tank plans, but those were not provided for review. Response: The underground storage tank vents have been relocated onto private property and out of the public right -of -way. Please see Sheet C1 -1 for details. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WVALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com Carol Lumb City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -2- March 9, 2005 3. The project proposal includes closure of the southerly site access on International Blvd. This closure will force trips to the other driveways — the northern driveway on International Blvd. and the other on Southcenter Blvd. The turning movements at the Southcenter Blvd driveway may be impacted by the future street improvements on Southcenter Blvd that call for six lanes at that driveway location — two lanes eastbound and four lanes westbound. Please be aware that left turn movements may be prohibited when the road is widened — this decision has not been made yet. Please review this with your engineering staff for safety considerations. The proposed street widening plans are attached for your review. Response: Comment noted. 4. Please provide a pedestrian connection to the site from International Blvd. Response: As requested, a pedestrian connection has been provided from the corner of the Tukwila - International Boulevard and Southcenter Boulevard intersection through the existing landscaping into the subject property. Please see Sheets C1 -1 and L1 for details. 5. A site visit noted a dumpster outside of the screened dumpster location. All garbage refuse containers must be screened from view as required by TMC 18.52.040 D. Response: A new dumpster enclosure has been located on site to screen the additional dumpster as required by the landscape code. 6. As part of the Administrative Design Review, the site must be brought into compliance with the landscaping code (TMC 18.52). Since the site has street frontage on two sides, the remaining sides of the property are considered side yards for the purposes of determining setbacks. There is no landscaping on the north and east sides of the site and the front landscaping does not comply with current requirements. Response: As required, we have provided landscaping along the north property line adjacent to the AM/PM building and between the proposed Sound Transit project. This area exceeds the required landscape requirements and will need to be coordinated to match with Sound Transit's landscaping plans. Additionally, due to the existing grade change, retaining wall, guard rails, and proposed additional dumpster enclosure located along the east property line, sufficient room does not exist to provide additional landscaping along this property line; however, according to Sound Transit's preliminary landscaping drawings, greater than minimum landscaping will be provided up to the existing retaining wall located on the ARCO site to provide a perimeter landscape buffer between the two properties and satisfy the intent of the City's perimeter landscape standards. 7. The City's sign code has specific standards for service stations, a copy of which is enclosed. The design of the signage is considered as part of the design review application, however a separate sign permit will be issued approving the signage. It appears that the site has too many signs (the mini -mart building is permitted 2 signs — one for each street frontage). Please have the sign company review the Sign Code and revise the site signage when • • Carol Lumb City of Tukwila Department of Community Development -3- March 9, 2005 applying for the sign permit. The sign permit should be submitted as soon as possible in order to incorporate review with the Administrative Design Review. Response: As required, all existing and proposed wall signs on site will be brought into compliance with Sign Code standards prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. BP /ARCO's retained sign contractor will be responsible for procuring Sign Permit applications for this project under a separate application. 8. Since Sound Transit has purchased the Public Storage site adjacent to the ARCO station, 1 provided a set of the building permit plans to Sound Transit for their review. Currently the property boundary between the ARCO site and the Public Storage site is blurred due to the driveway that provides access on the north to the storage facility. Once the storage site is developed for supplemental parking, the property boundaries will be clearer, as Sound Transit will be locating landscaping along the property boundary between the parking lot and the ARCO site. This will create an area that is a "no man's land." 1 identified that area on an enclosure with my February 5 letter. This area will present safety as well as aesthetic issues. Please coordinate the ARCO development plans with Sound Transit to present a more seamless development transition from one site to the next. A contact at Sound Transit is Greg Ball, architect, at 206 - 398 -5169. Response: The resulting "no man's land" will be landscaped according to City of Tukwila landscape standards and will meet, match, and be consistent with the proposed Sound Transit landscape improvements. Please refer to the enclosed landscape plan for details. City of SeaTac Comments 1. Install full frontage improvements along the properties frontage to consist of but not limited to sidewalks. curbs, gutters. street paving, . water mains. drainage facilities, sanitary sewers. all improvements required by any applicable ordinance and all necessary appurtenances. Such off-site improvements (except traffic signalization systems) shall extend the full distance of the real property to be improved upon and which adjoins property dedicates as a public street. s. (The underlined info is from language in the SeaTac Municipal Code with references to signalization deleted) Please see attached frontage improvement detail attached for your information. These improvements will require that the applicant obtain a right -of -way use permit from the City of SeaTac. Response: We have made contact with the City of SeaTac Public Works Department and have forwarded our proposed Tukwila - International Boulevard street frontage improvement plans to their attention for review and comment. The City has provided initial comments regarding street frontage improvements indicating that the proposed street frontage improvements indicated on the enclosed Sheet L1 are satisfactory to comply with the City of SeaTac's street frontage improvements for International Boulevard. As noted, we are currently submitting a separate Right -of -Way Use Permit application directly to the City of Carol Lumb City of Tukwila Department of Community Development • • -4- SeaTac for review and approval. A copy of the final permit approval will be forwarded to your attention when received. We believe that the above responses, together with the enclosed revised plans, address all of the comments in your letter dated February 25, 2005. Please review and approve the enclosed at your earliest convenience. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Thank you. S' 7.,. cerely, Joel A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/ath/tep 2369c.058.doc enc: As Noted cc: Dixie Hallenberger, City of SeaTac Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Bruce K. Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. F. Al Kendall, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Af March 9, 2005 Ms. Stefania Spencer Permit Technician City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Spencer: BUILDING DIVISION COMMENTS No comments. PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS No comments. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS • RE: Response to Comments Correction Letter No. 1 BP ARCO Gasoline Facility Forecourt Remodel 15250 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington City of Tukwila Development Permit Application No. D04 -386 ARCO FAC No. 5515 / Our Job No. 2369.1 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES March 9, 2005 HAND DELIVERY C. fit i / RECEIVED MAR 11 2005' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT We have revised the plans and associated information for the project referenced above in accordance with your comment letter dated February 24, 2005. Enclosed for your distribution are four sets of the revised construction drawings, one copy of the City's redlined plans, and one copy of the completed engineer's cost estimate. The following outline provides each of your comments in italics, exactly as written, along with a narrative response describing how each comment was addressed: 1. On plan sheet DS1 -2, please spell out the environmental consultant. List name, address, and phone number of the consulting firm, including the name of the contact person. If there is a geotech report associated with this project, please cross - reference the report on your plan as well. Response: The environmental consultant information has been listed on Sheet DS 1 -2 as required. 2. Verify direction of the North arrow on sheets ES1 - 1 and DS1 - 1 and revise accordingly. Response: The direction of the north arrow has been corrected on Sheets ES1 -1 and DS1 -1 as required. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com Ms. Stefania Spencer Permit Technician City of Tukwila -2- March 9, 2005 3. New vents are not allowed to be installed inside the City right of way; they should be inside the private property. Please revise sheets C1 -1, L1 -1 and ES1 -1. Response: The vents have been relocated onto private property and removed from the right -of -way. Please refer to Sheet C1 -1 for the revised location. 4. Submit a catalog sheet for the proposed oil/water separator and supporting calculations for sizing of the oil/water separator. Since the flow from the oil/water separate will be tied to the existing sanitary sewer system, please have your plans reviewed by King County Water and Land Resources Industrial Waste Program and Industrial Waste Discharge for approval. Please contact Mr. Arnauld Girard at (206) 263 -3012 and submit a copy of the approval to Public Works. Applicant shall also contact Val Vue Sewer District at (206) 242 -3236 and obtain a sewer permit since the subject property is within Val Vue Sewer District jurisdiction. Response: As requested, enclosed for your information is a catalog cut sheet for the proposed oil/water separator and supporting engineer's sizing letter prepared by Brian Wilkinson, P.E., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5. Please obtain a driveway closure permit from City of SeaTac Public Works Department. Contact Mr. Dixie Hallenberger at (206) 973 -4734 and submit a copy of the SeaTac permit to Public Works. It also appears that the subject driveway may be within WSDOT limited access. Please verify and, if this is the case, please submit a copy of WSDOT permit approval to Public Works. Response: As directed, we are currently procuring a City of SeaTac Right -of -Way Use Permit and will provide a copy of the approved permit to your attention when received. Additionally, according to discussions with Mr. Dixie Hallenberger, City of SeaTac Public Works Department, a separate Right -of -Way Use Permit from WSDOT will not be required for this project. 6. Maximum size of civil and landscaping plans shall not exceed 22" x 34 ". Please reduce the size of your plans. Response: Comment noted. The plans have been reduced to 22- by 34- inches as required. 7. Please make changes per attached sheets C1 -1 and L1 -1. Response: The redline comments on Sheets C1 -1 and L1 -1 have been addressed and plans have been revised as directed. A copy of the engineer's construction cost estimate has been included for your use and review. 8. The submitted Traffic Impact Analysis is in the process of being reviewed by Cyndy Knighton, Public Work Senior Transportation Engineer at (206) 431 -2450 and traffic comments are pending. This project proposal includes closure of the southerly access on International Blvd. This closure will force trips to the other driveways, which includes one on Southcenter • • Ms. Stefania Spencer Permit Technician City of Tukwila -3- March 9, 2005 Blvd. The turning movements at that driveway may be impacted by the future street improvements on Southcenter Blvd. that calls for six (6) lanes at that driveway location; two (2) lanes eastbound and four (4) lanes westbound. The concern is whether eastbound turns to /from that driveway will be allowed after the street improvements. Public Works suggests making the owner aware of the possible impacts and requests that Engineering review for safety considerations. Plans for proposed Southcenter Blvd. corridor sheets 25 and 26 are attached. Response: Comment noted. We look forward to reviewing the City's traffic impact analysis comments as soon as possible. In the meantime, should any additional questions or information be required regarding the traffic impact analysis, please contact me at your earliest convenience. We believe that the above responses, together with the enclosed revised construction drawings, address all of your comments in your letter dated February 24, 2005. Please review and approve the enclosed at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Thank you. Sincerely, 1 A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/tep /dm 2369c.059.doc enc: As Noted cc: Ms. Carol Lumb, City of Tukwila Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Bruce K. Creager, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Dixie Hallenberger Engineering Technician Supervisor City of SeaTac 4800 South 188th Street SeaTac, WA 98188 • • RE: Right -of -Way Use Permit Application Expansion of Existing ARCO Gasoline Facility 15250 Pacific Highway South, Tukwila, Washington BP ARCO No. 5515 / Our Job No. 2369.1 Dear Mr. Hallenberger: March 9, 2005 HAND DELIVERY At the request of our client, BP /Global Alliance, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., is submitting documents for the review and approval of the Right -of -Way Use Permit. The proposal is to close the southerly driveway along International Boulevard and re- landscape the property's frontage in conformance with the enclosed landscape plan. Enclosed for your review is the following: 1. Four (4) sets of civil and landscape plans 2. One (1) completed Right -of -Way Use Permit Application form 3. One (1) copy of the Engineer's Cost Estimate 4. One (1) check for $378, for the Right -of -Way Use Permit It is our understanding that the enclosed information constitutes a complete Right -of -Way Use Permit Application and look forward to your written response and/or approval. Should you need further assistance or additional information, please contact me at this office. Thank you. Sincerely, /744 oel A. Howitt Project Planner JAH/dm/ath 2369c.053.doc enc: As Noted cc: Ms. Carol Lumb, City of Tukwila Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. J. David Carroll, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • TEMECULA, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA www.barghausen.com RECEIVED MAR 11 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • From: "Dixie Hallenberger" <dhallenberger @ci.seatac.wa.us> To: <jhowitt@barghausen.com >, <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/3/05 10:30AM Subject: ARCO AM /PM @ 15252 International Blvd. Carol & Joel, Attached are the marked up L1 -1 and C1 -1 plans for the AM /PM. Thank you for h opportunity to comment. Mr. Dixie Hallenberger, P.E. Engineering Technician Supervisor 4800 S. 188th St. SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 dhallenberger@ci.seatac.wa.us 206 - 973 -4734 (Direct & Voice Mail) 206 - 973 -4730 (Engineering Division) 206 - 973 -4769 (FAX) CC: "Jack Dodge" <jdodge @ci.seatac.wa.us> From: "Dixie Hallenberger" <dhallenberger @ci.seatac.wa.us> To: <jhowitt@barghausen.com >, <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/3/05 10:30AM Subject: ARCO AM /PM @ 15252 International Blvd. Carol & Joel, Attached are the marked up L1 -1 and C1 -1 plans for the AM /PM. Thank you for h opportunity to comment. Mr. Dixie Hallenberger, P.E. Engineering Technician Supervisor 4800 S. 188th St. SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 dhallenberger@ci.seatac.wa.us 206 - 973 -4734 (Direct & Voice Mail) 206 - 973 -4730 (Engineering Division) 206 - 973 -4769 (FAX) CC: "Jack Dodge" <jdodge @ci.seatac.wa.us> From: "Dixie Hallenberger" <dhallenberger @ci.seatac.wa.us> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 2/25/05 10:48AM Subject: ARCO AM /PM L05 -007 & D04 -386 Hi Carol, Attached is a pdf file and doc file of SeaTac's Comments. Mr. Dixie Hallenberger, P.E. Engineering Technician Supervisor 4800 S. 188th St. SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 dhallenberger @ci.seatac.wa.us 206 - 973 -4734 (Direct & Voice Mail) 206 - 973 -4730 (Engineering Division) 206 - 973 -4769 (FAX) Mayor Frank Hansen Deputy Mayor Terry Anderson Councilmembers Gene Fisher Chris Wythe Ralph Shape Joe Brennan Don DeHan February 25, 2005 Dear Ms. Lumb • Carol Lumb Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 "The Hospitality City" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Via Mail & eMail • RECEIV 'FEB 2 8 2005 COMMUNITY DEvELOP RE: ARCO AM/PM Mini -Mart Applications L05 -007 and D04 -386 The Engineering Division has reviewed the information provided on the ARCO AM /PM Mini -Mart proposal to redevelop their site at 15250 International Blvd. As the value of the redevelopment exceeds $75,000 we will require that the International Blvd. frontage be improved as follows: 1. Install full frontage improvements along the properties frontage to consist of but not limited to sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street paving, , water mains, drainage facilities, sanitary sewers, all improvements required by any applicable ordinance and all necessary appurtenances. Such off -site improvements (except traffic signalization systems) shall extend the full distance of the real property to be improved upon and which adjoins property dedicated as a public street. Traffic (The underlined info is from language in the SeaTac Municipal Code with references to signalizaton deleted) Please see attached frontage improvement detail attached for your information. These improvements will require that the applicant obtain a right -of -way use permit from the City of SeaTac. 4800 South 188th Street • SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 City Hall: 206.973.4800 • Fax: 206.973.4809 • TDD: 206.973.4808 • www.ci.seatac.wa.us City Manager Bruce A. Rayburn Assistant City Manager Craig R. Ward City Attorney Mary E. Mirante Bartolo City Clerk Judith L. Cary DI -193 AM/PM Mini tart Page 2 of 2 Please have the applicants engineer contact me at 206 - 973 -4734 or dhallenberger@ci.seatac.ea.us. Thank you for the chance to comment on the proposal. Since ly, Dixie Hallenberger, P.E. Engineering Technician Supervisor cc: DI -193 • "II lll__,, "1111 n IIl CHECKED: DM DRAWN: DLH REV.: DATE: 3/3/98 6" TOPS CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 Z - W - ITH FRAME AND VANED GRATE 12" STORM DRAINAGE PIPE 6" GRAVEL BACKFILL t z--- FOR FUNDATION STREET TREES 30 FEET ON CENTER 4" CEMENT CONCRETE, SIDEWALK .rt< 2 "CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS INDUSTRIAL - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DETAIL/FRNTJEST 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE CL. B , (LEVELING COURSE) 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP /BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS 8 WEARING COURSE 9 ' 1 Mr. Joel Howitt Barghausen Engineers 18215 72 Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Dear Joel: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: L05 -007, ARCO Canopy Replacement 2. Sheet C1 -1 identifies tank vents in the Southcenter Blvd. right -of -way. The tank vents are not permitted to be located in the Southcenter Blvd. right -of -way. Also, a note on Sheet C1-1 refers to tank plans, but those were not provided for review. 4. Please provide a pedestrian connection to the site from International Blvd. 5. A site visit noted a dumpster outside of the screened dumpster location. All garbage refuse containers must be screened from view as required by TMC 18.52.040 D. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor We have had an opportunity to review in further detail the proposed new canopy for the ARCO service station and have the following questions or comments on the Administrative Design Review application. 1. International Boulevard along the ARCO site is within both the City of SeaTac jurisdiction as well as the State Department of Transportation — not the City of Tukwila. You will need permits from both jurisdictions for working in their right -of -way to remove the southern driveway. Mr. Dixie Hallenberger is the contact at the City of SeaTac. He can be reached at 206 - 973 -4734. The street name should be corrected on the plans to International Blvd. — rather than the former name of Pacific Highway South. A copy of comments received from the City of SeaTac are enclosed. 3. The project proposal includes closure of the southerly site access on International Blvd. This closure will force trips to the other driveways — the northern driveway on International Blvd. and the other on Southcenter Blvd. The turning movements at the Southcenter Blvd driveway may be impacted by the future street improvements on Southcenter Blvd that call for six lanes at that driveway location — two lanes eastbound and four lanes westbound. Please be aware that left turn movements may be prohibited when the road is widened - this decision has not been made yet. Please review this with your engineering staff for safety considerations. The proposed street widening plans are attached for your review. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Mr. Joel Howitt Barghausen Engineers February 25, 2005 6. As part of the Administrative Design Review, the site must be brought into compliance with the landscaping code (TMC 18.52). Since the site has street frontage on two sides, the remaining sides of the property are considered side yards for the purposes of determining setbacks. There is no landscaping on the north and east sides of the site and the front landscaping does not comply with current requirements. 7. The City's sign code has specific standards for service stations, a copy of which is enclosed. The design of the signage is considered as part of the design review application, however a separate sign permit will be issued approving the signage. It appears that the site has too many signs (the mini -mart building is permitted 2 signs — one for each street frontage). Please have the sign company review the Sign Code and revise the site signage when applying for the sign permit. The sign permit should be submitted as soon as possible in order to incorporate review with the Administrative Design Review. 8. Since Sound Transit has purchased the Public Storage site adjacent to the ARCO station, I provided a set of the building permit plans to Sound Transit for their review. Currently the property boundary between the ARCO site and the Public Storage site is blurred due to the driveway that provides access on the north to the storage facility. Once the storage site is developed for supplemental parking, the property boundaries will be clearer, as Sound Transit will be locating landscaping along the property boundary between the parking lot and the ARCO site. This will create an area that is a "no man's land." I identified that area on an enclosure with my February 5 letter. This area will present safety as well as aesthetic issues. Please coordinate the ARCO development plans with Sound Transit to present a more seamless development transition from one site to the next. A contact at Sound Transit is Greg Ball, architect, at 206- 398 -5169. Please revise the plans to incorporate the corrections noted above. If you have any questions, please call me at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, c-id/i/a 46444/ Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Manager Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer, Public Works Department Dixie Hallenberger, City of SeaTac Greg Ball, Sound Transit Link Light Rail Station q:AARCO L05- 007 \Howitt.doc 2 V February 24, 2005 Mr. Joel Howitt Barghausen Engineers 18215 72n Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 RE: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Development Permit Application Number D04 -386 Arco AM/PM —15250 Tukwila International Boulevard Dear Joel: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I . have enclosed comments from the Building, Planning and Public Works Departments. At this time, the Fire Department has no comments. Building Department: Ken Nelsen, at (206) 431 -3677, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Planning Department: Brandon Miles, at (206) 431 -3684, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Public Works Department: Joanna Spencer, at (206) 431 -2440, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 433 -7165. Sincerely, Stefania`Spencer Permit Technician encl xc: File No. D04 -386 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Siiite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Building Division Review Memo Date: Project Name: Application #: Plan Review: Feb. 14, 2005 Arco AM /PM permit application D04 -386 Ken Nelsen, Senior Plans Examiner Tukwila Building Division Ken Nelsen, Sr. Plan Examiner Because the scope of work is primarily structural in nature, general architectural code requirements of the I.B.C. will not be reviewed. However, this Department recommends the applicant focus their efforts to address the structural correction letter from our consultants Reid Middleton, dated February 10, 2005. Architectural review will not be approved prior to the final resolution of all structural concerns. No further comments at this time. r DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development February 1, 2005 Joel Howitt D04 -386 15250 TIB Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revisions, Brandon Miles is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at (206) 431 -3684. 1. Planning will not approve the building permit application until Administrative Design Review has been completed. PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 r 1 DATE: February 22, 2005 PROJECT: ARCO AM /PM Minimart PERMIT NO: D04 -386 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) On plan sheet DS1 -2, please spell out the environmental consultant. List name, address, and phone number of the consulting firm, including the name of the contact person. If there is a geotech report associated with this project, please cross - reference the report on your plan as well. 2) Verify direction of the North arrow on sheets ES1 -1 and DS1 -1 and revise accordingly. 3) New vents are not allowed to be installed inside the City right of way; they should be inside the private property. Please revise sheets C1 -1, L1 -1 and ES1 -1. 4) Submit a catalog sheet for the proposed oil /water separator and supporting calculations for sizing of the oil /water separator. Since the flow from the oil /water separator will be tied to the existing sanitary sewer system, please have your plans reviewed by King County Water and Land Resources Industrial Waste Program and Industrial Waste Discharge for approval. Please contact Mr. Arnauld Girard at (206) 263 -3012 and submit a copy of the approval to Public Works. Applicant shall also contact Val Vue Sewer District at (206) 242 -3236 and obtain a sewer permit since the subject property is within Val Vue Sewer District jurisdiction. 5) Please obtain a driveway closure permit from City of SeaTac Public Works Department. Contact Mr. Dixie Hallenberger at (206) 973 -4734 and submit a copy of the SeaTac permit to Public Works. It also appears that the subject driveway may be within WSDOT limited access. Please verify and, if this is the case, please submit a copy of WSDOT permit approval to Public Works. 6) Maximum size of civil and landscaping plans shall not exceed 22" x 34". Please reduce the size of your plans. 7) Please make changes per attached sheets C1 -1 and L1 -1 8) The submitted Traffic Impact Analysis is in the process of being reviewed by Cyndy Knighton, Public Works Senior Transportation Engineer at (206) 431 -2450 and traffic comments are pending. This project proposal includes closure of the southerly access on International Blvd. This closure will force trips to the other driveways, which includes one on Southcenter Blvd. The turning movements at that driveway may be impacted by the future street improvements on Southcenter Blvd. that calls for six (6) lanes at that driveway location; two (2) lanes eastbound and four (4) lanes westbound. The concern is whether eastbound turns to /from that driveway will be allowed after the street improvements. Public Works suggests making the owner aware of the possible impacts and requests that Engineering review for safety considerations. Plans for proposed Southcenter Blvd. corridor sheets 25 and 26 are attached. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS (P:Laurie Admin/Joanna/Comments D04 -386) From: Joanna Spencer To: Carol Lumb Date: 2/18/05 10:28AM Subject: Arco L05 -007 • • Just had a brief chat with Brian. Based on the two Sound Transit plans I gave you, it appears that the south portion of the drwy along International Blvd that require permit from SeaTac for closure, is also within WSDOT limited access and will require a WSDOT t permit as well. Sorry, I didn't catch it the first time. Joanna From: Brian Shelton To: Joanna Spencer Date: 2/16/05 11:12AM Subject: ARCO AM /PM Minimart • • The project proposal includes closure of the southerly access on International Blvd. This closure will force trips to the other driveways which includes one on Southcenter Blvd. The turning movements at that driveway may be impacted by the future street improvements on Southcenter Blvd that call for 6 lanes at that driveway location; 2 lanes eastbound and 4 lanes westbound. The concern is whether eastbound turns to /from that driveway will be allowed after the street improvements. I suggest making the applicant aware of the possible impacts and request that Engineering review for safety considerations. I will provide you with a copy of the proposed Southcenter Blvd plan. CC: Bob Giberson From: Donald Tomaso To: Carol Lumb Date: 2/8/05 4:11 PM Subject: Re: ARCO on 154th & TIB Carol, 13'6" is the minimum height for fire truck access. Don • »> Carol Lumb 02/03/05 05:11 PM »> Hi Don: how high did you say the canopy needed to be for clearance of your trucks? I'm measuring it right now and it looks like it is 14 '/z feet high to the lower edge of the canopy over the pumps. Thanks. Carol From: Nora Gierloff To: Carol Lumb Date: 2/8/05 10:52AM Subject: Re: ARCO Rod Kempkes, P.E. Tukwila Line Segment Manager and Sue Comis, A.I.C.P. Public Involvement both at: Sound Transit Link Light Rail 401 S. Jackson St. Seattle, WA 98104 • • »> Carol Lumb 02/08/05 10:49AM »> Hi: I'd like to mail Sound Transit the NOA for the ARCO project - do you have a contact person that I should send it to? thanks Carol Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION /, . it L HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt f r � ,, !)r Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt 1 1 `i U Official Notice Mailer's Signature: ` Short Subdivision Agenda 1 _ Notice of Application s Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other r' • • t Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this � 't � � day of ::��' in the year 20 OL P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: ., .� �, f r � ,, !)r i (4 i7 / Project Number: L .f• -• , ' UU 1 ') Q 1 1 `i U Mailer's Signature: ` 1 • i .-= . -at/i, t_ j/ ,;LAi.4 1 _ ' .r -'7 s Person requesting mailing: r' • • t Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this � 't � � day of ::��' in the year 20 OL P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM 1,' • Application Filed: January 27, 2005 Notice of Completeness Issued: February 4, 2005 Notice of Application Issued: February 8, 2005 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF A,pP'LICATIOR PROJECT INFORMATION ARCO AM/PM Mini -Mart represented by Joel Howitt, Barghausen Engineering, has filed applications for demolition of an existing fuel island canopy, installation of a new canopy and closure of the southern-most driveway along Tukwila International Boulevard The site is located at 15250 Tukwila International Boulevard. Permits applied for include: L05 -007: Administrative Design Review D04 -386: Building Permit, Other known required permits include: None at this time. Studies required with the applications include: None. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Please call ahead to ensure the availability of the files. Project Files include: L05 -007, Administrative Design Review D04 -386, Building Permit OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Tuesday, February 22, 2005. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The appeal bodies are as follows: L05 -007, Administrative Design Review: Board of Architectural Review D04 -386, Building Permit: Tukwila Hearing Examiner For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at (206) 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. • GENERAL PROJECT NOTES • ALL DON. 51011 CONFORM 10712 T2 LATEST EMION Of EP ARCO COPE . WI 117.. All PERSONA RORNw0 ON STE MUST CDMRETE M[ Wry T,40.0 MD POSE55 R VMD BP PNSSPOIR CARD I MI TEw 1 080r 04041 MUM TURN.. AND 8604' UNLESS _ DNA• -. COMSTRUCTDN REW.RCVENTS: IMNTI.12 AT STRUM. ' RITE CONPONENTS AS 007407 /10.01100 O'AS'A DES.E0 PAST S.A. x. + CP UNUNDESIRABLE R ANT BE LEE ERECTS • T E SUR... AREA CO NTRAC10400) SHALL ON A R[ORAR BASIS. MDUTIE R000T T R W SAMCE . A. UMN COMPEL,. Or 12 PROJECT 01102 AIL WI M. ON RCERLY 031*1500 VENT. SURGEON'S N ORDER +0 C. wry; ME 040mRAE1. 5HALL BE SOELY AND 0CMPFCl7 A L PERSONS � O*0005086 19 NN 00 CURING MI SAFETY Or P111ORMANCE 07 TM WORN AND SHALL APPLY COMINUASLY AND NOT M UNITED 10 70RWL WORONC 000*. 0. ME 0000AROR(5) SHALL VERIFY THE LDCAT. OF ALL RISING LIULP155 AND PROTECT 7003 AS REOARE0 THE ONTRAiC1DR(S) STALL TO REPAIR T2 A NNE �T. 03440210 UR O. CONSTRUCT. A NO COST PAINT SPECIFICATIONS N RAISER .DRS KN. N. STS . SRL W T4 C.01 ' B. tt110F 4Y Iq POTS. RASE. KN 539 r 8030 MOB NEW 54ND FORDS 010 E Ix BP WARM CRAY 10 10 DOVE /10 370 8 1501. PANT Mr. CANOPY C4uMN5 SLAG. 10 wrCR [ RISNG. FOR LOCAL 41 0EV0E ARIL LOCATIONS CONTACT 3P FIELD ENONEER. ARCO (BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, L.L.C.) FUELING CANOPY, PIPING, AND DISPENSER UPGRADE PROJECT FACILITY NO. 5515 15252 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SO. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 GENERAL NOTES 1 THE GEHEw CONTRACTOR n TO PRO. ALL LABOR. EASPErt AND MATERIALS NECESSARY 10 PERORU ME RORA M INDICATED N M[SL I ANN. x NE C CONTRACTOR IS 10 INSTALL ALL EO 100! ROMEO Y .1RROMEO F. A THE WS:ALGTTON 15) Rn 07 . EM' R OR ME EOUOT 1 PROVO. R BP. T2 CaRRPCTS. . •OT(M'. 3 IN THE PTO0XT. RAID P AND VENT MP. LAYOUT 8 51 11 [1 S MGM.. 1400 ADDY, IS NOT WINDED TO It AN 0.1 REPRESE 1 0 0 OF 01 I TND *4400 ��TDN PRO.. A SATIN COT65TCrt O *100 M[ INTENT OF Mt 0E93. THE CANE. CONTRACTOR Mu3T PREPARE AND P AMIDE - At -RAT TAW. u... MAPLETON OF MRG NSTALUT ON, AND A NAADE TO 6WONAUSEN CDNAATIG 1102011. RR SHER 001. • ARCS[ PURR ARE 9.1.01C ONLY THE GENERA. SCOPE DE TIE PROJECT DEFINED MO T2 Bo 6111421 MUM THE R10.7 TO ALTER OR (DANNM SOAK M MAIM. 5 ME 00004 CONTRACTOR 5 RESP.SI04 FOR ANT AND ALL 0040E (AMA 0P BELOW GRADE) TO THE r,CRm. DURING CONSTRUCT. s. 075 �l CONTRACT. S TO RM*DE A MASTER. ADM.. wwD wn AND OJRINO CORSA. ID. P.M 7 THE ON `AA CONTRACTOR BASIS CLEAN-JP IN ANO AACCGOYNCC AM BP T RM01005. FEDERAL SATE M0 LOCAL Ca. 1 C 10 PRO. • NONA ASSISTANCE OURNC STORE REMD:ND ALL R0TR W *7* 100115E1EENA M PART STATES PROJt3 ST COU MUST Of AMERCA THE P DIM,. ACT OF 1w0 AND STATE RELATED COOT. 1 S E 10CN mt PCND1RD 10 ENSURE CONRAN. WITH 5.. RATITES BOTH M SUPPLSD Ta NI M •Rµ1.00 ON TA PROW S L 1 0 02 [0 0[0 NA:HY C.STRJCIION. 12 CONTRA. IS 00CN0R70 FL1 BDAR2.0 LP Ml 4 *40 5. RTTCCIN R7 ELM STORE TO NECESSARY PERSONNEL AND KEEP. THE STORE ACC[b AREA 11 RESIROMS M T2 STORE AND 1101 F. CONTRA IA VA J a COVC [ 510NAR *CA 70 P c 0 C04KR (15105/4 m c ram - mE 1. PA IR +EST // A00 iHWG G W w REST T R M O . R T A R 0 * 3 4. P THIS S A TRJCNNE OAR+ PAS i0 K 2.500 PSL PR 1. • SU.DM - 3 • Ola a. 172116), . Vi PONE Or P4C0100 SNR:NU:GE - 0.03 YANDONA S. CONCRETE SLAP T065 504.4 BE M:NWM R CO 11.6 263 (. OM.RIR ROTC ON THESE DNR.DS) 3 CONCRETE SOW. BE MCNWL 1010(1 WTI • 000 OF 1. x T/x. l q1 MTH A 04004 01 1 1/2 GALLONS 00 WANT PER SPCA. • REARMING F. ORM STABS GALL - FIBER 454. SUMP CAGES SHALL - /S RESM 1. Aro BOTTOM f. RFTE IN • NOR ALT CO•DIT. FOR AT LUST 7 CATS ER B PLACENpi ONCE DIRECTLY FR. TR.., 210 F0101S, 00 NOT NW 10NCRE2 .LEIS s. SPECIAL NSPECT.. IN ACCORDANCE W. CHAPTER 3 a 12 U10 IS PROM.. 7, FIELD DA 0 NEE00 017 LGTT 7 0011011 BEFORE A PLACING 0004050. 4n. To ME tl FUELING AND DRIVE SLAB CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS B. mVSLV.TE N RACE USNO • M[C.... MM.T. 0. BEFORE RACING CONCRETE SECURE R*NF0RC7 STEEL. ANCHOR BOLTS GORES, AND oMES RAVER N P.m. TO FAVOR Mdprtm. 141 0. 00 aS *2 ANAMAP • SHALE CORM. COR TO A.0.1.-31e ESPEOnCATIONS O r2 OA AND WACO/ OF CONCRETE) 11. FOR 81ALIT CONCRETE COLOR 4340 LTA. 5CO0410 10MPA.W 101044:0', 5 MC OA A000 AND RETARDER m53 KW R D FOR THE FIELD 1EED F.20400 c..DNS. CA MOP APPRO. MIL. NOTE. SURFACE APPLIED SIACR PAM A NOT GOOTARC • NOT APwCARE 470055 PATCHING INTO MSP0 5010 • CONCRETE. NOTE THAT • GEM (FGA- C0.01110) CONCRETES STANDARD 12. MINT F. M ENTIRE PRIER SAIL 15 513E ME 100 NAND. AND 0101 513E .RL .AGGREGATE BOTH .E AND MASC. SNARL 51 Su0R0E0 FROM ON MACE MA 00005. REAM B COAST 1 FOR ALL COLORED CONCRETE 13. MAERS TRANSPORT. WNDRETE APL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED PRIOR TO LIMING CONED CONCRETE PIGMENTS SRLL SE ADDEO TO Am AT [M`E PO NT' A N O SHHA SE . D A TOR TO 0000 ARLY. r a NW. I1 ER THE h qL 4C BE PROJECT. . NEUK ICKKAY FACILITY SOUTH - 5504)0 LOCATED 8 NGTONN RE S IS SCOPE: DETGJ4C1. ANO INS744TON OF NON GO S*N0 Co0F, wSN.ATION Y 2. R,4 IS■G DM.. SYSTEM. MULL.. 0/ N. TANK SLA AM TAW ECUPM PR Urt. TERMS ON. PP., *ER OSPENAI6. 03•00. SUMPS. KLAN...011 -WML vRIT SYS1EM; CONCRETE O w3S AM *s T PROJECT DIRECTORY SP WEST COAST PRODUCTS. LAC (NCO) • LA o RP *044FO OA Rr0 M • 1001 TEl (714) 0510-5310 CONTACT: ARCH NORM, • OM w3 -0010 01005ER BARCNUS0 CONSULTING 00.5EK 1 7.0 AvE SOUTH RENT, RA5241. 93031 TEL (415) 151 -1221 CONTACT: OA RID CARROLL (.15) 331 -14y ENGINEER 1 TIE E 0. MIEN MISTY KT_R ME CC 1002. RESPENS LL 10 Or. 1.0010CM AND ELEC../ RR.M. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY BP AND OTHERS CONTRACTOR ttO0 COSTS MARRED At RHOS W O1 . E TO 1m.ER . NO ALL BE BLEED SLACK TO E CONTRACTOR. TOA RP 1. UN0 /LINE TESTING 1 ROB SR-U• CONTRACTOR TO PART -. AND CERTIFY DR USING T AORIED SEP. CONTRACT. FORM 1143 FOLLOW/0 ITEMS 3 OSPUSER .N RANIT RUT -G • VEIDES RCOT RAN/NR RANT-TA 5. R PETRO WARRNRY RUT -. • POWER MA SAUIRM PARRURT START-U• CODE INFORMATION PERNA NR50CII0N. 1U0DRD C.E. iK 2003 10m011 010.0 01 WOE: IOC 2003 MT. PLUMBING CODE: IN 2023 0(100 ELECTRICAL CODE: NEC 2002 EDT. RA E WE 2003 ErIN ENE Isom: *00001. RGY COOL WMNN.OT. SATE APPLICABLE COM PROJECT INFORMATION Vicinity Map SHEET INDEX LL SAW • PROJECT SROIKATDRS G-1 SITE APROK44GT RAN IMOE TA M k PARC DEMOLITION SIR RAN u"MDE""RC°ROU°u0`"r'.HMA YTE 510 RAN CATS �.1 a POUT aNERAL �rES ��n�a i W.K .w .+ERA. T6 i a� � .LE wTn uc =us 43 N 5 Au 0.05 TWO ALL • VAPOR RS11 STATIC CRRINDOC DETAILS M311 TAKK •PANG MA10ML5 '3151 (1 .11 431.2 • PANG WERE. LAT (2 OF 21 TALK RA. MO. CAW. DARE RAIL FISERGIAS3 roa 43.3.5 VSl OiST T. S) W 110 M5.•15 0*10 TLM2 CE? AND PropD MTA.LA7DN DRw 4 3.123 F4 05 5 SUMPS PSTAIIATro0 ORALS (15- 103 -0) :55.14 SIPHON PANG NSTALU.TON DBMS m.51.23 INYNE TOKMEN MANS. ELECTRICAL S.EMAT4 RANG M.a.9 IS .I0 KEN ROOT N M6 MD R PRRO FAM D RANG AND ORALS AV6 (2021 CONFIGURATION) 10.35.31 CORNS. ORALS: WAY2 MT. 112 RENDER. ▪ fS.w LIMTEP -SLAVE ST ATI SPC20 LASTS MC[R ROST PROCP .. 61 -1 FUELING SYR. ELECTRICAL SITE RAN E51 -2 FLUNG SYSTEM PANEL A CONDUIT SCHEDULES 6 -2 FIAEL SYSTEM ELECTRICAL SCNEw1C UAGIAM Ex -0 10( � 0 . 540001100L 0RNS 04 -5 RECTRL•. M4TERINSS UT ` STC GI -1 CANCER FIG. RN CA1-1 CAMP' REFLECTED CON. RAN W -■ CNOR 6EV•TDNS AND OCT. E, CA. TRW= RAN • UN. 6NATON 52 CND SECTION FOUNDATION DATA GENERAL CONTRACTOR SCOPE OF WORK a REUUVE MONO .4'132' .S STAND CANOM • ASSOWTED E0RP01Em. • ROANE ALL 1) OE PROD. D:SPENYM. A. ROM. ALL 5 ) .D EDWIND 106 ,SANDS EVPOVE ALL -4) WRING FU6 ISLAND WUNRDS 0. AMORE UISTM UNDERGROUND NEL STORAGE TUA SLAB a. REMOVE DRAG ASP., PAVING NECE0 011 TO RENO2 LACER..RID 10001011 NO INSTALL N. UN0.C.AM0 FUEL STORAGE TANK 0050047, RAGE 1 MIND. VETO NANO AND RISERS AND ELEM. CONDUCT. /C.0 T WON,TOR RIO[ SYRFM. 11. 00E ALL COSTING PRODUCT AND 1 RPNO. 1. REMOVE ALL POSTING UNDER... FUEL STORAGE TAW KM RANG AND RISERS 1, RE0102 UISIDIC (4) UMEDROUND NEL STORAGE TA:1N REATED MANHOLES, SuMR, RSERS TURA... ETC REMOVE UST. 106 SYSTEM ELECTRC. 10N:04TOR /CONDM. PANELS. ETC. Mir 2GESEART 0 02 OTSTRO DAMAGED /.1100RATIG ASPHALT A.R. (HOT REURD TO FIRING PRAT) N MILD FOR. m ENO. OcSTNG PARA. LOT STRING /STOW M GALLED F.. 1. C067RUCT1. a. ML Nn w' 58 au. CAROPT • 2741 NA REATTI TANK CONTAN•01t SUMPS. WARR. NRS¢5. WEEPS. 8426. RC 0. INSTALL NEW (/I UNDER DISPENSER MNAMANT SLAPS NO RwTEO EONPARNT. a. INSTALL REST GOUBU -MALL RECRL PRO.CT LPEE R4LLpG UNLUDEC 5.KKADN AND CROSSOVER .ES. .. P6TALL NEW SNGLE -RAIL RAGE 1 (MOM REW0ERT F * 44. 1EP RPM. 7. *MALL N( NEP UNDE,ROUND FUEL STORAGE TA SNORE -0AML IGLA55 RELATED ELECTR 'YSiEM IN[W.G OFEAIFILI ALARM, LEA. PRO PO.A S NEW/MODIFY SENSORS. M O RED'S. NG S N,` OACI DUET /5[µ'a ELECTRIC. CONTOKT MW JNDG.OYND 106 SiO4042 TAM EAR 1. CONSTRUCT N. (8) FUEL ISLANDS ▪ CONSTRUCT IN67 I AA. ELN T FUELING DRIVE N TO REPLACE PRANG REUO20 OA TO R MULL Nov (II) w mE RSeO PRWDR NSP N. NRML N. PARKING LOT RRPN0 /SYMIOLS AS L 41ED F.. ARCO OKKARNSTAMARILme BLOVIs G /oba/Alliance p Q _' GHA0 Y A • 1575 . 2 8*000 1 5010 FAC mme Romp p NNE roar VSO 3/1/D4 Mw 77TEL 100RCT T1 we pap RUBY' (4x1) L31 - 512 0 MCA ART • UKOEK0000105105A05 TANK STANDAKW El2AENT 1101 *4=MIEA(51 AYEIOCAN ITAMA00• / .STS Bmn •5515 BCE m1E f1 -r �.1 0 -1 i SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN Pacific Highway South (SR 1) RECEIVED PJAN 2 7 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY () KENT UBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE () POLICE ( ) FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM () WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL KtvItWISr1Uectunt rtrcmi mAILInua • P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC FEDERAL AGENCIES WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES KING COUNTY AGENCIES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES MEDIA • ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.O. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION" ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR () K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC UBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE > VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 - WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE -P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY �� 'SOUND TRANSIT S- - t 4/.... / A — ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.V VVW P•LIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR T�LMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Perrnit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Perrnit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: ADMI ISTRATTVE\FORMS\CHKLIST.DOC City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2599 1908 IuKwtra, vvrt yoioo - c..,» Ms. Sue Comis, AICP Public Involvement Sound Transit Link Light Rail 401 S. Jackson St Seattle, WA 98104 Mr. Rod Kempkes, P.E. Tukwila Line Segment Manager Sound Transit Link Light Rail 401 S. Jackson St. Seattle, WA 98104 5 Mr. Artemio Cervanteft Jr. ARCO 4 Centerpointe La Palma, CA 90623 Mr. Joel Howitt Barghausen Engineering 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 February 4, 2005 Mr. Joel Howitt Barghausen Engineers 18215 72 Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 RE: L05 -007, ARCO Canopy Replacement Dear Mr. Howitt: • Cizy of Tukwila • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Your application for Administrative Design Review of the new fueling island canopy located for the ARCO service station located at 15250 Tukwila International Boulevard has been found to be complete on February 4, 2005 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. A Notice of Application will be issued for this project and the project plans will be routed to other City departments for review and comment. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. Since you indicated that your client is anxious to proceed with construction of the new fuel island canopy, I wanted to give you some preliminary comments on the project. These are only preliminary — more detailed comments will be provided at a later date combining any comments received from other City departments. • Landscaping: When a project triggers design review, it provides an opportunity to review the project site for compliance with other portions of the Zoning Code and Sign Code. A cursory review of the site indicates that the landscaping does not comply with the City's current landscaping standards. As part of the design review of this project, the entire site needs to be brought into compliance with the City's landscaping code. I am enclosing a copy of the landscaping chapter for your review. • Signage: The City's sign code has specific standards for service stations. The design of the signage is considered as part of the design review application, however a separate sign permit will be issued approving the signage. I am enclosing an application for permanent signs for completion as well as general information about signage for the site. I will have more detailed comments about signage when I provide the technical comments on the permit application. When you apply for the sign permit, please provide information on all the existing signage on the site. Mr. Joel Howitt L05 -007 ARCO Canopy Replacement February 4, 2005 • • • Coordination with Sound Transit development on east: Sound Transit has purchased the Public Storage site adjacent to the ARCO station on the north and east for parking to supplement the parking across the street at the Link Light Rail Station. I am enclosing the planting plan for the Public Storage site for your review. It indicates there will be an area between the north property line of the ARCO property and the chain link fence /guard rail area that extends from the northwest wall of the AM/PM Mini -Mart that will be a "no -man's land." Please take a look to see if there is a way to coordinate with the development taking place on the Public Storage site to present a more seamless development transition from one site to the next. This notice of complete application applies only to the permit identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain any other necessary permits issued by other agencies. The development of the Link Light Rail Station will bring many changes to this part of Tukwila International Boulevard. The upgrading of the ARCO station will provide an exciting opportunity to coordinate these two developments. After I receive comments for the other reviewing Departments I will be contacting you to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Reviewing City Departments Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor q:\ARCO-L05-0071Complete.doc 2 ti sPAaU.- 3.p)6_10l SCALE Dote Dsn. Chk. LEGEND SYMBOL App Revisions 0 0 SHEET P76 —L BOTANICAL NAME 2 P 4 TREES ACER PLATANOIDES 'CRIMSON KING' (DACER CIRCINATUM ACER RUBRUM 'ARMSTRONG' CHAMAECYPARIS OBTUSA 'GRACILIS' FRAXINUS OXYCARPA 'RAYWOOD' FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 'MARSHALL SEEDLESS' PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CHANTICLEER' THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'EMERALD' LARGE SHRUBS CORLUS CORNUTA HAMAMELIA X INTERMEDIA MAHONIA AOUIFOLIM 'COMPACTA' MEDIUM SHRUBS ROSA RUGOSA VIBURNUM T I NUS 'DWARF' Designed By. Drown By Checked By Approved By 1 I 1 1 1.41111i.411126 iiikAilL �• u /' �i. 1�i! OO�i�rJ�0 .0 "O'O;•�13U - .O, • rJ• i .•o ;�O,OirJfjiO'O, "� O - oigrrl0i` ■ s �ij rirO:O� ��OC; :00!� SO'Q:O:O. j!O.O: O. •51,01 •:0 O �00.A:O iir ■ in •• iiiiil 4i, .N L`_COGCOi)00 _G DO- i^Lld M. 01 IMIT OF PERIMETER LAND EQ TREI._ gE SHEETS P7 P7s= 7(U04_EOR-MOR w FORMATIONj COMMON NAME SYMBOL CRIMSON KING MAPLE VINE MAPLE ARMSTRONG MAPLE HINOKI FALSE CYPRESS RAYWOOD ASH GREEN ASH FLOWERING PEAR EMERALD ARBORITAE HAZELNUT WITCH HAZEL COMPACT OREGON GRAPE RUGOSA ROSE (WHITE) DWARF LAURUSTINUS Submitted: PLANTING PLAN (NORTH) SCALE: 1"= 20' -0" 0 0 0 9 BOTANICAL NAME LOW SHRUBS PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS 'OTTO LUYKEN' PYRACANTHA COCCINIA 'LOWBOY' TAXUS CUSP I DATA 'MONLOO' GROUND COVERS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA —URSI RUBUS PENTALOBUS 'EMERALD CARPET' POLE MOUNTED LIGHTS PEDESTRIAN LIGHT SCORED CIP CONC WALK ■u■ Dote: (Approved: r .•e°r'd ( ' 1 P76 —LP02 O o O f }--- -o COMMON NAME _---- -------,--7- --, ., ; OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL FIRETHORN SPREADING YEW EMERALD ARBORITAE GREEN ASH Dote: NOTE: FOR COMPLETE PLANT SCHEDULE AND NOTES REFER TO SHEET P76 —LPOI iiif SOUNDTRANSIT eea3n .g \ -; Scale I"=20' Filenome: S55_TUK_LP02.dwg Contract No. C 755 Dote: 7/23/04 � r I ATCH 20 10 LINK LIGHT RAIL PROJECT TUKW I LA FREEWAY ROUTE s. 54TH ST STATION NORTH SURFACE PARKING LOT PLANTING PLAN (NORTH) 0 20 SCALE IN FEET Drawing No.: Sheet No.: 40 TUK —LPO2 68 A Rev: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: October 21, 2004 CONTACT: Joel Howitt, Barghausen Engineers RE: D04 -386, ARCO AM /PM ADDRESS: 15250 Tukwila International Blvd. Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revision, Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 -431 -3661. 1. Please provide a landscaping plan for the new landscape area fronting on Tukwila International Blvd. The landscaping plan must include the number and type of plantings, and their spacing. Please refer to TMC 18.52, Landscape, Recreation, Recycling/Solid Waste Space Requirements chapter of the City's municipal code. The City's municipal code can be found o the City's web site: www.ci.Tukwila.wa.us. cc: Brandon Miles, Associate Planner q:\mydocs\genera112004-MemosVD04-386.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • 41) CITY OF TUKWILA ADMINISTRATIVE Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us 152 O ILA I Ute-12 Tt la, OW • F c43 - Do--10 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Phone: ‘ • 1(• 1022 Z FAX: E -mail: - 11a t - , kAU.SP" . cooq, Signature: f,F i G:\APPHAMLA •- -.APP /11/03 •ef.Z• (• f$75Z Date: t • 2 7 • v� DESIGN REV Q ' 17 /4 ' 17 /4 �V�iu•,v, APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 1 opl•fcaj_ LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s) block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type P -BAR Planner: File Number: L- 5 -J j Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: v n -� -t-p 0G, Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: boy_ 3g(, • 41) CITY OF TUKWILA ADMINISTRATIVE Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us 152 O ILA I Ute-12 Tt la, OW • F c43 - Do--10 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Phone: ‘ • 1(• 1022 Z FAX: E -mail: - 11a t - , kAU.SP" . cooq, Signature: f,F i G:\APPHAMLA •- -.APP /11/03 •ef.Z• (• f$75Z Date: t • 2 7 • v� DESIGN REV Q ' 17 /4 ' 17 /4 �V�iu•,v, APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 1 opl•fcaj_ LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s) block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. :.Che&items . s ubmitted with application Information Required. May be waived in . unusual cases, upon approval o P grks �. and Planning. UU 'wily 2 . 7 vs APPLICATION MATERIALS: DE°E°u 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. \/ 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). IV 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11 ". One complete set of PMTs of the final drawing set will be required prior to final approval. V 4. Application Fee $400. N IA' 5. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: M free 6. If the project requires SEPA review a 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see SEPA Application). PROPERTY INFORMATION: 7.... Vicinity Map with site location. N r P I 8. Document sewer and water availability if provided by other than the City of Tukwila (for new construction only). PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: I/ 9. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) bJ(a- 10. Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis per King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). For additional guidance contact Public Works. (a- 11. Provide sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). SITE PLAN: l / 12 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". %•,/ (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. COMPLETL APP ' ICATION 6-4CKLI,ST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). C: \Nora's_Files \Red_Book \AdminBAR App.DOC 12/27/02 e c ' 1teiii �. a W1 5� i pp11Ca oil ._ � �n '- '"al i q {11�ay'be zvdi atiiii unusua c`ca es iet rozal o bvti P `sow tn a. 'i..... • ... : .._ . .... , (c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. / � (d) Fire access lanes and turn - arounds per Fire Department standards. ✓ (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. ✓ (f) Loading and service areas. (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors and materials. (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. I" frar (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk /public street. . ` Is( (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50 %). (k) • Show all existing and proposed easements. LANL SCAPE r'LAN: `r 13 (a) If the landscaping will be altered or the existing landscaping does not meet 'c standards (TMC 18.52) provide a landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". V (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN (If the project will affect any sensitive areas): (a 14 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36 ". kJ IA, (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. _ Existing and proposed building footprints. CIVIL PLANS (If utility or site work is proposed): 15 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. V (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. i,J ` I (d) Total expected cut and fill. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the TIR and KCSWDM. Include all storm drainage maintenance access and safety features. Call out C \Nora's_Files \Red Book \AdminBAR App.DOC. 12/26/02 r C heckc. , : iitems-' 1gbmitted i..Witn. application: Iriformahon Re • fired: May be uiaiued •inunusual caes;;up„a apprgval of both Aublic liNorks . andtP;lann ng :.. . total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. k..,/ (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. t..) LA- (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. j'. (i) Plan, profile and cross- section for any right -of -way improvements. (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn- arounds. OTHER: V 16. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and /or any proposed screening. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". 17. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 18. A rendering is optional. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). 14— 19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting if any changes to the existing fixtures are proposed. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot - candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. C: \Nora's_Files \Red_Book \AdminBAR App.DOC, 12/26/02 RECEIVED JAN' 2 7 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARCO Expansion Tukwila, Washington Traffic Impact Study November 1, 2004 Prepared for: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72" Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 TENW No. 2399/BCE No. 2369.1/ARCO FAC No. 5515 Prepared by: Transportation Engineering NorthWest ADDN'L INFORMATION PROVIDED BY APPLICANT ' EXPIRES 3/31106 1 RECEIVED crrn OF TUKWILA N 0 0 4 2004 PERMIT CENTER Transportation Engineering/Operations • Impact Studies • Design Services ♦ Transportation Planning/Forecasting 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M, PMB 323 ♦ Redmond, WA 98052 ♦ Office /Mobile (206) 396 -8286 • Fax (425) 398 -5779 D04..386 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Table of Contents FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS III INTRODUCTION 1 Analysis Approach 1 Primary Data and Information Sources 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 Roadway Network 5 Peak -Hour Traffic Volumes 5 Existing Level of Service 7 Collision Data 8 Pedestrian and Transit Facilities 9 Planned Transportation Improvements 9 DETERMINATION OF FUTURE CONDITIONS 9 Trip Generation 9 Trip Distribution and Assignment 10 Future Traffic Volumes 13 Future Levels of Service 13 Access Analysis 16 Levels of and Queuing 16 MITIGATION 17 Level of Service 17 Impact Mitigation Fees 17 Appendix Appendix A — Existing Traffic Volumes Appendix B — Level of Service Calculations at Study Intersections Appendix C — Site Access Level of Service and Queue Calculations Transportation Engineering NorthWest Page i November 1, 2004 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis List of Figures and Tables Figure 1 Project Vicinity 3 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan 4 Figure 3 2004 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4 PM Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 11 Figure 5 PM Peak Hour Pass -By Trip Assignment 12 Figure 6 2005 Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 14 Figure 7 2005 With. Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 Table 1 LOS Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections 7 Table 2 2004 Existing Level of Service Summary — PM Peak Hour 8 Table 3 Intersection Collision Analysis Summary (2001 -2003) 8 Table 4 Trip Generation Summary 10 Table 5 2005 Level of Service Summary — PM Peak Hour 13 Table 6 PM Peak Hour Site Access Level of Service 16 Transportation Engineering NorthWest Page ii November 1, 2004 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis FINDINGS ac CONCLUSIONS This report documents the transportation impact analysis for the proposed expansion of the ARCO gas station located on the northeast corner of SR 99 / S 154 Street in the City of Tukwila. The City of Tukwila requires a transportation impact analysis for all projects that are expected to generate five or more net new PM peak hour trips. The existing site includes 8 fueling positions and an AM/PM convenience market. Access to the site is currently provided onto SR 99 and S 154 Street. The proposed expansion would add four additional fueling positions for a total of 12 fueling positions (8 existing + 4 new). The expansion is expected to be completed in the year 2005. Trip Generation. The four additional fueling positions are estimated to generate 740 net new daily trips with 26 net new trips (13 entering, 13 exiting) occurring during the each of the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection Operational Analysis. Weekday PM peak hour operational analyses were conducted at three study intersections in the project vicinity. The results showed that under 2005 future conditions with or with the proposed project, the two signalized study intersections and the stop controlled movement at the un- signalized study intersection are expected to operate at level of service (LOS) C or better. Therefore, no off -site mitigation is proposed. Access Analysis. An assessment of the site driveways on SR 99 and S 154 Street was completed including LOS and queuing. During the PM peak hour with the proposed project, the controlled movements at the driveways are expected to operate at LOS B or better with a 95 percentile vehicle queue of one vehicle. Mitigation. The ARCO expansion is not anticipated to add five or more peak hour project trips to any of the projects included in the City's Transportation Impact Fee Schedule. Therefore, the project would not be required to pay traffic mitigation fees. Transportation Engineering Northwest Page iii November 1, 2004 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis INTRODUCTION This traffic impact analysis has been prepared for the proposed expansion of the existing ARCO gas station located on the northeast corner of SR 99/S 154` Street in the City of Tukwila (see figure 1). The City of Tukwila requires a transportation impact analysis for all projects that are expected to generate five or more net new PM peak hour trips. The site currently includes 8 fueling positions and an AM /PM convenience market. Access to the site is provided onto SR 99 and S 154 Street. The proposed expansion would add four additional fueling positions to the site for a total of 12 fueling positions (8 existing + 4 new). The expansion is expected to be completed in the year 2005. A preliminary site plan of the expansion is shown in figure 2. Analysis Approach To analyze potential traffic impacts from the ARCO expansion, the following tasks were undertaken based on discussions with City of Tukwila staff: • Assessed existing conditions through field reconnaissance and reviewed existing planning documents. • Documented pedestrian and transit facilities within the project vicinity. e Estimated weekday daily, AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed expansion. • Assigned PM peak hour project - generated trips to the street network, based on the existing travel patterns in the area. e Analyzed thc PM peak hour operations at thc following study intersections: • SR 99 / S 152 Street • SR 99 / Military Road ➢ SR 99 / S 154 Street e Evaluated the operations at the existing site driveways on SR 99 and S 154 Street including LOS and queuing. • Assessed potential traffic mitigation to the City of Tukwila. Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 Page 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Primary Data and Information Sources e Traffic Scoping Memorandum to Cyndy Knighton — September 29, 2004. ® Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 7t1, Edition, 2003. ® Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, June 2004. e Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Updated 2000. • City of Tukwila Collision Data (2001 — 2003). e King County /Metro webpage as of October 2004. ® City of Tukwila's Six Year (2005 -2010) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 Page 2 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Transportation Engineering NorthWest Traffic Impact Analysis SEATTLE TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Transportation Engineering Engineering Northwest Figure 1 Vicinity Map ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA October 28, 2004 November 1, 2004 Page 3 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila C/) 73 co CD -,...'' --7 -- :--- -- .. ---- 1 I t ] st \ \ , — •`i — ., 7 s l. /,...,,, "''' 1 \ '1' 4.. , - , Site plan provided by Barghausen Consulting Engineers September 27, 2004. — r Not to Sc.& ag Transportation Engineering Northwest Figure 2 Preliminary Site Plan ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA October 28, 2004 Transportation Engineering NorthWest Traffic Impact Analysis November 1, 2004 Page 4 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway Network The following describes existing arterial roadways that would be used as routes to the site. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of facility type, number of lanes, and posted speed limits. SR 99 is a five lane north -south principal arterial in the project vicinity. Along the project frontage, the posted speed limit is 40 mph. S 154 Street is a two lane east -west street (west of SR 99) which provides a link between SR 99 and I -5. In the project vicinity, the posted speed limit is 35 mph. Peak -Hour Traffic Volumes Weekday PM peak hour traffic volume data was collected at the study intersections on Wednesday October 6, 2004 (traffic counts conducted by All Traffic Data). Based on City guidelines, study intersections were determined based on intersections impacted by five or more trips generated by the project during the weekday PM Peak hour period. The following are the study intersections that were analyzed in this report SR 99 / S 152"`' Street SR 99 / Military Road SR 99 / S 154 Street Figure 3 shows the 2004 PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections as well as the PM peak hour volumes at the site driveways. The PM peak hour turning movement count sheets are included in Appendix A. Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 Page 5 tD ) _ a0 if m rc N N r k R— 110 E-- 230 Ar" 137 S 154Ur Street rill 296 — J 197 --/ 264 !` 1 f ef n N n vr a a A m N N aa l -- F 91,8 Military Rd <— 305 iiii a a A 33 v r 0 re <— 61 iiii S 152nd Stree r il 37-- !,l 1 t r 75 —3• m ° N N 20 1 1 1 1 ARCO cpanslon - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis SR 99 /S 152nd Street SR 99 /North ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Out Only) 1,0 90 4 - 11 829 40 SR 99 /South ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Out Only) 1,0 90 4 – 59 810 r 7 SR 99 /Military Road S 152nd Street S 154th Street Legend = Study Intersection — XX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume S154th Street/ARCO Driveway (Full Access) SR 99/S 154th Street NOT TO SCALE Transportation Engineering Northwest Figure 3 2004 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA Odobet 2B, 2004 Transportation Engineering NorthWest November I, 2004 Page 6 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Existing Level of Service Traffic Impact Analysis An existing 2004 weekday PM peak hour level of service (LOS) analysis was conducted at the study intersections. Level of service refers to the degree of congestion on a roadway or intersection. It is a measure of vehicle operating speed, travel time, travel delays, and driving comfort. Level of service is generally described by a letter scale from A to F. LOS A represents free -flow conditions - motorists experience little or no delays, and LOS F represents forced -flow conditions where the number of vehicles arriving exceed the capacity of the intersection. The LOS at stop - controlled intersections is based on average control delay (sec /veh) and is reported for each movement. Therefore, the reported LOS at unsignalized intersections does not represent a measure of the overall operations of the intersection. The LOS reported for signalized intersections represents the average control delay per vehicle entering the intersection. Table 1 outlines the LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 1 LOS Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Delay Range (sec) Delay Range (sec) Level of Service A < 10 < 10 B >10to20 >10 to 15 C >20 to 35 >15 to 25 D >35 to 55 >25 to 35 E >55 to 80 >35 to 50 F >80 >50 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual ", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000 Intersection LOS were calculated using the methodology and procedures outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board (TRB), using the Synchro 6 and Highway Capacity Software (HCS2000) software programs. The PM peak hour LOS analysis results for the study intersections are summarized in Table 2. Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 Page 7 Table 2 2004 Existing Level of Service Summary — PM Peak Hour Delay Intersections LOS (sec /veh) V/C Signalized Intersections 0.61 0.67 1. SR 99 / 152 Street C 20.7 3. SR 99 / 154 Street C 25.0 Un- Signalized Intersections' 0.27 2. SR 99 / Military Road Eastbound Right B 10.6 I The level of service at stop - controlled intersections is reported for each movement. LOS does not represent a measure of the overall operations of the intersection Therefore, the reported 1 1 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Collision Data Traffic Impact Analysis At intersections, collision rates are developed based on examination of the number of accidents occurring per million entering vehicles (MEV) throughout the year. As part of this traffic study, collision data that was provided by the City for the three - year period 2001 through 2003. This collision data was reviewed and evaluated. Table 3 provides a summary of collisions at each study intersection between 2001 and 2003. Table 3 Intersection Collision Analysis Summary (2001 -2003) # of Collisions per Year 3 -Year Annual Rate Study Intersection 2001 2002 2003 Total Avg. (Col/MEV)' 1. SR 99 / S 152 °d Street 7 6 7 20 6.7 . 0.94 2. SR 99 / Military Road 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.00 3. SR 99 / S 154 Street 8 3 4 15 5.0 0.45 1. Col/MEV = average number of collisions per million entering vehicles. Based on the assumption that the PM peak hour volume at each intersection represents approximately 10 percent of the daily volume. A collision rate of 1.0 at a signalized intersection is typically considered average. As shown in Table 3, all study intersections have an annual collision rate of less than 1.0 which would not indicate a high accident location. Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 Page 8 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Pedestrian and Transit Facilities Pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity include sidewalks on both sides of SR 99 and on the north side of S 154 Street. Crosswalk are also provided at all legs of the signalized study intersections along SR 99. Transit service to and from the project vicinity is provided by King County /Metro Transit. The closest Metro bus stop is located at the intersection of SR 99/S 15?' Street two blocks away, which serves route 174. Route 174 provides service to from the project vicinity and downtown Seattle. S and Planned Transportation Improvements p p The purpose of this section is to document the known planned transportation improvements in the study area. There are no planned transportation 1 improvement projects identified in the City of Tukwila's six -year 2004 - 2009 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in the study area. DETERMINATION OF FUTURE CONDITIONS Trip Generation The estimated weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation associated with the proposed expansion (four additional fueling positions) is ' shown in the Table 4 below. The trip generation calculations were based on the trip rates included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7 edition for Land Use Code (LUC) 853, Convenience ' Market with Gasoline Pumps. Pass -by trip reductions associated with the expansion were estimated based on rates included-.in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, June 2004. 1 1 1 Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 ' Page 9 Table 4 Trip Generation Summary Net New Fueling Trip Trips Generated Land Use Positions Rate' In Out Total Daily 4 370.3 740 740 1,480 Less pass -by trips (50%) 370 370 740 Net New Daily Trips = 370 370 740 AM Peak Hour 4 17.17 34 35 69 Less pass -by trips (63%) 21 22 43 Net New AM Peak Hour Trips = 13 13 26 PM Peak Hour 4 19.22 38 39 77 Less pass -by trips (66 %) 25 26 51 Net New PM Peak Hour Trips = 13 13 26 Notes: Average trip rates for LUC 853 — Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps were used for AM and PM peak hour trip estimates. Lower range of ITE trip rates used for daily trip generation estimate to be consistent with estimated AM and PM peak hour trips. 2 Daily pass -by is estimated; no daily pass -by data in ITE Trip Generation Handbook. 1 1 1 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis As shown in Table 3, the proposed ARCO expansion is estimated to generate 740 net new daily trips with 26 net new trips (13 entering, 13 exiting) occurring during each of the AM and PM peak hours. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of the net new project - generated PM peak hour traffic was estimated based on existing travel patterns in the study area. The following summarizes the general distribution of the project - generated PM peak hour traffic. s 35% to /from the north on SR 99 O 35% to /from the south on SR 99 o 10% to /from the east on S 154 Street O 20% to /from the west on S 154 Street Based on these distribution patterns, the PM peak hour project generated traffic was assigned to the local street system. Figure 4 illustrates the PM peak hour trip distribution and assignment. The distribution of pass -by trips was based on existing thru volumes on SR 99 and S 154 Street at the ARCO driveways. The assignment of pass -by trips is shown in Figure 5. Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 Page 10 co) rn 1 N y S 152nd Street •— u' .4_ 3 L , - 5 S 144th StroCo ril 2 — )1 co) rn 1 N S 152nd Street •— r r,, 1 1 1 1 1 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Transportation Engineering Northwest Traffic Impact Analysis SR 99/S 152nd Street SR 99 /ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Out Only) SR 99/Milita Road S 152nd Street S 154th Street Legend = Study Intersection = Net New PM Peak Hour Project Trip = Distribution Percent S154th Street/ARCO Driveway (Full Access) SR 99/S 154th Street NOT TO SCALE V Transportation Engineering Northwest • Figure 4 PM Peak Hour Net New Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA October 28, 2004 November 1, 2004 Page 11 S le o rn L l 0 10 S 154111 Street rill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis SR 99 /ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Out Only) SR 99 /S 154th Street S 152nd Street S 154th Street Legend = Study Intersection E — XX = PM Peak Hour Pass -by Project Trip S154th Street/ARCO Driveway (Full Access) NOT TO SCALE p Transportation Engineering Northwest Figure 5 PM Peak Hour Pass -By Trip Assignment ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA October 28.2004 Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 Page 12 Table 5 2005 Level of Service Summary — PM Peak Hour 2005. Baseline 2005 With Project Delay Intersections LOS (sec /veh) Delay V/C LOS (sec /veh) V/C Signalized Intersections` 0.61 C 210 0.61 0.75 C 33.7 0.81 1. SR 99 / 152 Street C 22.9 3. SR 99 / 154` Street C 32.0 Un- Signalized Intersections 0.39 B 12.0 0.40 2. SR 99 / Military Road Eastbound Right B 11.8 Signal cycle lengths and green time splits were optimized 2 The level of service at stop - controlled intersections is reported for each movement. Therefore, the reported LOS does not represent a measure of the overall operations of the intersection 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic impact Analysis Future Traffic Volumes Future traffic volumes with and without the proposed ARCO expansion were estimated for PM peak hour conditions in the year 2005. Future weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes used for the LOS analysis at the study intersections were developed based on existing traffic counts increased to account for potential background growth. Based on historical traffic count data (peak hour counts and WSDOT daily counts on SR 99) in the study area, no noticeable growth in traffic has occurred between 2002 and 2004. However, as a conservative measure, an annual growth rate of 2 percent was used to estimate future 2005 without project traffic volumes to account for potential growth. The weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes in the year 2005 without the project are shown on Figure 6. Future year 2005 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the ARCO expansion were estimated by adding the net new PM peak hour project trips (Figure 4) and the pass -by trips (Figure 5) to the 2005 baseline traffic volumes (Figure 6). Figure 7 shows the year 2005 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the ARCO expansion. Future Levels of Service Future 2005 level of service was analyzed at the study intersections with and without the proposed ARCO expansion. The PM peak hour LOS analysis results for the study intersections are summarized in Table 5. Detailed level of service summary worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 Page 13 2 Military red ix O N d) F ZE8 311 --� illi m 8 34 N v r — SI F 62 — ' LN 82 290 - S 152nd Street 38 1 t r 77 --4. g i G . 20 - V CI v en r ` a0 *- le L s __ 112 t 235 140 S 154th Street 302 — ) t i 201 — ' v P- 290 - r 1 1 t 1 1 1 w ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis SR 99/S 152nd Street SR 99 /North ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Out Only) 1,090 4' 11 844 40 SR 99 /South ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Out Only) 1,090 k-59 SR 99 /Military Road S 152nd Street S 154th Street Legend = Study Intersection '4—XX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume • 5154th Street/ARCO Driveway (Full Access) SR 99/S 154th Street NOT TO SCALE r Transportation Engineering Northwest Figure 6 2005 Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA October 28, 2004 Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 Page 14 d O 34 Si F- 62 ) 4 L m 62 S 152nd Street !•� nd 38 t t I 77 — f 2 Si' 'n 20 N N N 7 L ,r — F 9E9 r N N N 7 L ,r — R- 112 4-- 238 155 S 154th Street 304 —J 202 -- 290 !` 1 t d'n g n y 1 1 1 r w 1 r I 1 r 1 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis SR 99/S 152nd Street SR 99 /ARCO Driveway (Right -In, Right -Cut Only) SR 99 /Military Road S 152nd Street Legend = Study Intersection f— XX = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume S 154th Street S154th Street/ARCO Driveway (Full Access) / 64 20 .J b 54 4 -- 44 325 -11 'r 405 SR 99/S 154th Street NOT TO SCALE V Transportation Engineering Northwest Figure 7 2005 With Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ARCO Expansion Tukwila, WA October 28, 2004 Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 Page 15 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Access Analysis As shown in Table 5 all signalized study intersections and stopped controlled movements at un- signalized study intersections are expected to continue operating at level of service (LOS) C or better with or without the proposed ARCO expansion. Access to the ARCO Tukwila site is currently provided by two right -in, right -out only driveways on SR 99 and a full access driveway on S 154 Street. As part of the proposed expansion project, the southern right -in, right -out only driveway on SR 99 would be removed. Level of service and queuing were assessed at the anticipated two site driveways during the PM peak hour. Traffic volumes used in the analysis were based on counts conducted at the site driveways on Tuesday September 14, 2004 with the addition of pass -by and net new project trips generated by the four additional fueling positions. Levels of Service and Queuing The PM peak hour operations at the site driveways on SR 99 and S 154 Street were analyzed using the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. The following Table 6 summarizes the calculated PM peak hour LOS and 95 percentile queues at the controlled movements at the site driveways. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix C. Intersection Table 6 PM Peak Hour Site Access Level of Service 2005 With Project Delay 95 Percentile LOS (sec /veh) Queue (veh) SR 99 / ARCO Driveway Westbound Right A 9.6 1 S 154 Street / ARCO Driveway Southbound Shard Left —Right B 12.4 1 Eastbound shared Left -Thru A 8.6 1 Note: Analysis based on methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. As shown in Table 6, all controlled movements at the site driveways are expected to operated at LOS B or better with a 95 percentile queue of one vehicle with the proposed project expansion. Transportation Engineering Northwest November 1, 2004 Page 16 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis MITIGATION Level of Service Impact Mitigation Fees The installation of site - specific improvements under SEPA is primarily determined by the results of the LOS analyses conducted at study area intersections. Based on the results shown in Table 5, with or without the proposed ARCO expansion, all signalized study intersections and stopped controlled movements at un- signalized study intersections are expected to operate at LOS C or better. Therefore, no off -site mitigation is proposed. Impact mitigation fees are assessed in the City of Tukwila if a proposed development adds five or more peak hour traffic trips to any project or projects identified in the City's Transportation Impact Fee Schedule. The City's current Transportation Impact Fee Schedule includes the following projects: • Southcenter Parkway / 168 Signal • West Valley / Strander NB dual left turn lanes • Interurban Bridge widen for dual lefts • Minkler (Andover Parkway W to Southcenter Parkway) construct 3 -lane street • S 178 Street (Southcenter Parkway to West City Limits) realign (cap /safety /transit) • Andover Park W (Tukwila Parkway to Strander) widen to 5 lanes • Andover Park E at Minkler: Widen to 5 lanes at intersections. • Southcenter Parkway (S 180 Street to South City Limits): Construct 3- and 5- lane street. The ARCO expansion is not anticipated to add five or more peak hour project trips to any of the above project. Therefore, the project would not be required to pay City traffic mitigation fees. Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 Page 17 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Engineering NorthWest Appendix A: Existing Traffic Volumes November 1, 2004 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 r 1 i 1 I 1 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM Volume Percent 04:45 Volume Peak Factor High let. Volume Peak Factor 112 10.3 33 817 75.0 191 161 1090 14.8 33 257 05:00 PM 23 215 46 284 0.960 137 28.7 46 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 230 48.2 65 110 477 23.1 24 135 04:45 PM 46 65 24 135 0.883 176 24.0 32 482 68.1 142 04:30 PM 52 121 19 72 729 9.9 17 191 192 0.949 296 38.1 71 File Name : 99 &154th Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/6/2004 Page No : 2 197 26.4 55 284 38.6 80 04:45 PM 71 55 80 0 n r C n 5 O co n n N. 0, N 01-1 G! + 99 /INTERNAIONAL BLVI) Out In Total ( 8881 1 10901 1 1 1 611 8171 1 121 R Thru Left I North 1 19781 10/6/2004 4:30:00 PM 10/6/2004 5:15:00 PM Unshifted 41 1' r Left Thru Right 1 1751 4821 721 1 I 1 1236) f 729 Out In Total 99 /INTFRNATONAI RI VT) 1 19671 t_ s 2 0 0 V m O C 777 208 206 0.943 Int. Total 3073 789 0.974 99 /INTERNATONAL BLVD Southbound S 154TH ST Westbound 99 /INTERNATONAL BLVD Northbound S 154TH ST Eastbound • Start Time Left Thru Right I Totai Left Thru Ri Total APF' Left I Thru Right Total gyp Left Thru Right APP" Total 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 r 1 i 1 I 1 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM Volume Percent 04:45 Volume Peak Factor High let. Volume Peak Factor 112 10.3 33 817 75.0 191 161 1090 14.8 33 257 05:00 PM 23 215 46 284 0.960 137 28.7 46 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 230 48.2 65 110 477 23.1 24 135 04:45 PM 46 65 24 135 0.883 176 24.0 32 482 68.1 142 04:30 PM 52 121 19 72 729 9.9 17 191 192 0.949 296 38.1 71 File Name : 99 &154th Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/6/2004 Page No : 2 197 26.4 55 284 38.6 80 04:45 PM 71 55 80 0 n r C n 5 O co n n N. 0, N 01-1 G! + 99 /INTERNAIONAL BLVI) Out In Total ( 8881 1 10901 1 1 1 611 8171 1 121 R Thru Left I North 1 19781 10/6/2004 4:30:00 PM 10/6/2004 5:15:00 PM Unshifted 41 1' r Left Thru Right 1 1751 4821 721 1 I 1 1236) f 729 Out In Total 99 /INTFRNATONAI RI VT) 1 19671 t_ s 2 0 0 V m O C 777 208 206 0.943 Int. Total 3073 789 0.974 05700 PM 23 215 46 12 284 05:15 PM 29 211 40 10 280 05:30 PM. 28 214 31 8 273 05:45 PM 31 182 32 4 246 Total 111 822 149 32 1082 Grand Total 222 165 288 58 2143 Approt % 10.4 76.3 13.3 Total % 3.8 27.6 4.8 38.2 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 -251 -0300 38 64 29 2 121 29 67 34 5 120 28 22 35 2 86 29 63 13 2 95 124 188 111 11 421 241 405 204 28 850 28.4 47.6 24.0 4.1 8.8 3.4 14.4 Groups Printed- Unshifted 47 113 18 4 178 44 108 18 3 168 39 111 17 3 187 68 98 9 2 183 186 428 62 12 678 360 937 121 37 1418 25.4 68.1 8.6 6.1 15.8 2.0 24.0 63 52 65 6 180 80 46 77 3 203 77 42 72 4 191 79 53 90 8 222 299 193 304 18 796 581 365 658 43 1504 38.6 24.3 37.1 9.8 8.2 9.4 25.4 File Name : 998154th Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/6/2004 Page No : 1 23 763 788 21 771 792 15 718 731 14 725 739 73 2976 3048 184 5915 6079 2.7 97.3 1 i 1 i i i 1 i I i i 1 1 i 99 /INTERNATONAL thbo und S 154TH ST Westbound 99/1NTERNATONAL Northbound S 154TH ST Eastbound Erclu Start lime Left Thr u Rig ht � APP, Total Left Thr u Rig ht HV App. Total Left Thr u Rig ht HV App. Total Left Thr u p FIV App, Total Total int Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 30 215 32 6 277 25 48 25 3 98 40 119 14 9 173 73 43 65 3 181 21 729 760 04:15 PM 21 207 30 6 258 22 62 21 4 95 50 127 9 4 188 58 30 47 6 133 20 872 692 04:30 PM 27 200 42 8 269 24 54 23 4 101 52 121 19 4 192 82 44 82 10 188 24 750 774 04:45 PM 33 191 33 6 257 46 65 24 6 135 32 142 17 8 191 71 55 80 6 206 26 789 815 Total 111 813 137 24 1081 117 219 93 17 429 174 609 69 26 742 282 172 254 25 708 91 2940 3031 05700 PM 23 215 46 12 284 05:15 PM 29 211 40 10 280 05:30 PM. 28 214 31 8 273 05:45 PM 31 182 32 4 246 Total 111 822 149 32 1082 Grand Total 222 165 288 58 2143 Approt % 10.4 76.3 13.3 Total % 3.8 27.6 4.8 38.2 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 -251 -0300 38 64 29 2 121 29 67 34 5 120 28 22 35 2 86 29 63 13 2 95 124 188 111 11 421 241 405 204 28 850 28.4 47.6 24.0 4.1 8.8 3.4 14.4 Groups Printed- Unshifted 47 113 18 4 178 44 108 18 3 168 39 111 17 3 187 68 98 9 2 183 186 428 62 12 678 360 937 121 37 1418 25.4 68.1 8.6 6.1 15.8 2.0 24.0 63 52 65 6 180 80 46 77 3 203 77 42 72 4 191 79 53 90 8 222 299 193 304 18 796 581 365 658 43 1504 38.6 24.3 37.1 9.8 8.2 9.4 25.4 File Name : 998154th Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/6/2004 Page No : 1 23 763 788 21 771 792 15 718 731 14 725 739 73 2976 3048 184 5915 6079 2.7 97.3 1 i 1 i i i 1 i I i i 1 1 i 1 1 1 i i 1 1 AU Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectbn 04:30 PM Volume 104 704 Percent 12.2 82.8 04:30 Volume 18 174 Peak Factor High Int. 05:15 PM Volume 24 188 Peak Factor M 44 852 6.2 6 198 10 220 0.968 A 61 39.4 20 61 39.4 19 . 33 21.3 7 04:30 PM 20 19 7 46 0.842 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Out In Total I 8521 I 1 441 7041 1041 RI ht Thru Left 6481 7851 Out 155 46 North 188 23.0 59 15001 10/6/2004 4:30:00 PM 10/6/2004 5:15:00 PM Unshifted -i T r Left Thru Right I 1881 5781 501 I � I 8161 In 16011 Total 578 70.8 160 04:30 PM 59 150 50 6.1 7 816 216 7 216 0.944 37 28.0 10 File Name : 99 &152nd Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/6/2004 Page No : 2 75 56.8 20 20 152 5 132 35 05:00 PM 10 23 5 38 0.868 _ 2 w 0) 0) Co m C.) A Int. Total 1955 493 0.991 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Southbound S 152ND ST Westbound 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Northbound S 152ND ST Eastbound Start Tune Left Thru Right I ToPtai Left I Thru Right Tot Pal Left Thru Right I TAPotaPi Left Thru Right Total 1 1 1 i i 1 1 AU Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersectbn 04:30 PM Volume 104 704 Percent 12.2 82.8 04:30 Volume 18 174 Peak Factor High Int. 05:15 PM Volume 24 188 Peak Factor M 44 852 6.2 6 198 10 220 0.968 A 61 39.4 20 61 39.4 19 . 33 21.3 7 04:30 PM 20 19 7 46 0.842 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Out In Total I 8521 I 1 441 7041 1041 RI ht Thru Left 6481 7851 Out 155 46 North 188 23.0 59 15001 10/6/2004 4:30:00 PM 10/6/2004 5:15:00 PM Unshifted -i T r Left Thru Right I 1881 5781 501 I � I 8161 In 16011 Total 578 70.8 160 04:30 PM 59 150 50 6.1 7 816 216 7 216 0.944 37 28.0 10 File Name : 99 &152nd Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/6/2004 Page No : 2 75 56.8 20 20 152 5 132 35 05:00 PM 10 23 5 38 0.868 _ 2 w 0) 0) Co m C.) A Int. Total 1955 493 0.991 Start Time Factor 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Southbound Left 1.0 Thr u 1 .0 04:00 PM 13 155 04:15 PM 17 168 04:30 PM 18 174 04:45 PM 46 158 653 Rig ht 1:0 HV 1 .0 APP. Total 3 1 171 3 2 188 6 3 198 15 4 219 S 152ND ST Westbound Left 1 .0 Thr u. 1.0 Rig ht i 1.0 NV 1.0 App. Total 19 10 3 0 32 16 11 8 0 33 20 19 7 2 46 12 17 8 1 37 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Northbound Left 1 .0 Thr u 1.0 Rig ht 1 .0 HV 1.0 App. Total S 152ND ST Eastbound Left 1.0 Thr u 1.0 Rig ht 1.0 HV 1.0 APP. Total 9 17 4 1 30 11 10 2 1 23 10 20 5 0 35 8 14 4 2 24 Exclu Total Into. Total Int. Total 10 426 435 9 433 442 10 493 503 20 490 510 Total 92 27 10 772 05:00 PM 18 188 13 8 217 05:15 PM 24 188 10 3 220 05:30 PM 14 167 10 5 191 06:46 PM 9 153 8 4 170 Total 65 692 41 18 798 Grand Total 157 1 5 68 28 1570 Apprch % 10.0 65.7 4.3 Total % 4.2 38.2 1.8 42.3 67 67 24 15 17 10 14 8 8 14 13 8 17 13 8 60 61 32 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 2225 NE 27th St Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Groups Printed- Unshifted 45 137 10 8 192 45 134 12 6 191 69 150 7 5 216 46 151 13 13 210 148 195 672 42 32 809 36 61 15 4 112 49 1841 1890 42 30 33 38 143 127 108 68 3 291 43.6 37.1 19.2 3.4 2.9 1.5 7.8 43 128 14 3 185 40 149 16 0 205 62 166 8 2 215 33 146 12 1 191 168 578 50 6 796 363 11b0 92 38 1606 22.6 71.7 6.7 9.8 31.0 2.6 43.2 10 23 5 0 11 18 6 0 11 17 1 0 15 15 4 0 47 73 16 0 136 38 35 29 34 83 134 31 4 248 33.6 64.0 12.6 2.2 3.6 0.8 8.7 File Name : 99 &152nd Site C ode : 00000000 Start D ate : 10/6/2004 Page No : 1 9 482 491 3 490 493 7 468 476 5 433 438 24 1873 1897 73 3714 3787 1.9 98.1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 r r Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 16 Percent 27.6 05:30 Volume 5 Peak Factor High Int 05:30 PM Volume 5 Peak Factor 0 0.0 0 42 72.4 12 0 12 58 17 17 0.853 0 0.0 0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 401 91.1 108 39 8.9 13 05:30 PM 0 108 13 440 121 121 0.909 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 6 0 0 0 36 10.1 9 321 89.9 86 05:30 PM 9 86 I- 0 co 0 M r —� DRIVE 1 Out In Total 751 I 581 1 I 1 421 01 1 161 Right Thru Left �-J 1 -► I 3/14/2004 5:00:00 PM 3/14/2004 5:45:00 PM Unshifted 4, T r► Left Thru Right 1 01 01 01 1 1 I Out I In 01 Total DRIVE 1 I North 1 1331 01 m 0 0 -4 0 cr. 2 a 0 File Name : Drivel &154th Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 2 0 0.0 0 357 95 0 95 0.939 Int. Total 855 233 0.917 DRIVE 1 Southbound S 154 TH Westbound DRIVE 1 Northbound S 154 TH Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right A. APP. Left Thru Right APP' Total Lett Thru Right Total Total Left Thru Right APP. Total 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 r r Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 16 Percent 27.6 05:30 Volume 5 Peak Factor High Int 05:30 PM Volume 5 Peak Factor 0 0.0 0 42 72.4 12 0 12 58 17 17 0.853 0 0.0 0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 401 91.1 108 39 8.9 13 05:30 PM 0 108 13 440 121 121 0.909 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 6 0 0 0 36 10.1 9 321 89.9 86 05:30 PM 9 86 I- 0 co 0 M r —� DRIVE 1 Out In Total 751 I 581 1 I 1 421 01 1 161 Right Thru Left �-J 1 -► I 3/14/2004 5:00:00 PM 3/14/2004 5:45:00 PM Unshifted 4, T r► Left Thru Right 1 01 01 01 1 1 I Out I In 01 Total DRIVE 1 I North 1 1331 01 m 0 0 -4 0 cr. 2 a 0 File Name : Drivel &154th Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 2 0 0.0 0 357 95 0 95 0.939 Int. Total 855 233 0.917 Grand Total 34 0 85 1 119 Apprch % 28.8 0.0 71.4 Totally 2.1 0.0 5.2 7.3 0 782 62 9 0.0 92.5 7.5 0.0 48.9 3.8 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Groups Printed- Unshifted 824 I 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No Drivel$,154th : 00000000 : 9/14/2004 :1 85 598 0 10 681 1 20 1624 1044 12.5 87.5 0.0 6.2 38.7 0.0 41.9 1 1.2 98.8 i 1 i w I 1 i i i I r i 1 i i 1 DRIVE 1 Southbound S 154 TN We stbound DRIVE 1 Northbound S 154TH Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Righ t' HV APP' Total Left Thru Rlgh 1 HV A PP' Total Left Thru High t HV APP. Total Left 7hru Rlgh HV 1 App Total Exdu. Total Inch'. Total, - Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1.0 1.0 1:0 1.0 1.0` _ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 8 0 8 - _ 0 18 0 83 9 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 15 63 0 0 78 0 188 188 04:15 PM 4 0 14 0 18 0 117 6 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 7 69 0 0 76 0 217 217 04:30 PM 2 0 13 0 15 0 74 4 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 13 67 0 0 80 0 173 173 04:45 PM 4 0 8 0 12 0 87 4 2 91 0 0 0 0 0 14 78 0 2 90 4 193 197 Total 18 0 43 0 Of 381 23 2 384 0 0 0 0 49 275 2 324 4 769 773 05:00 PM 4 0 9 0 13 94 6 2 99 0 0 0 0 10 78 2 86 4 198 202 05:15 PM 4 0 8 0 12 108 12 1 120 0 0 0 0 8 85 4 93 5 225 230 05:30 PM 5 0 12 1 17 108 13 2 121 0 0 0 0 9 88 2 95 5 233 238 05:45 PM 3 0 13 0 16 91 9 2 100 0 0 0 0 9 74 0 83 2 199 201 Total 18 0 42 1 58 401 .39 7 440 0 0 0 0 38 321 8 357 16 855 871 Grand Total 34 0 85 1 119 Apprch % 28.8 0.0 71.4 Totally 2.1 0.0 5.2 7.3 0 782 62 9 0.0 92.5 7.5 0.0 48.9 3.8 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Groups Printed- Unshifted 824 I 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No Drivel$,154th : 00000000 : 9/14/2004 :1 85 598 0 10 681 1 20 1624 1044 12.5 87.5 0.0 6.2 38.7 0.0 41.9 1 1.2 98.8 i 1 i w I 1 i i i I r i 1 i i 1 f 1 i 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 0 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:30 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 05:15 PM 0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 O 11 0.0 100.0 O 1 O 7 11 7 0.393 O 829 0.0 95.4 O 219 40 4.6 16 05:30 PM O 219 16 869 235 235 0.924 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 SR 99 Out In . Total 1 0 1 840 1 1 1 01 01 01 RIg ht Thru Left +' 1 8401 01 North 9/14/2004 5:00:00 PM 9/14/2004 5:45:00 PM Unshifted Left Thru Right 1 01 8291 401 1 1 1 1 8691 Out In Total SR 99 1 8691 2 a 0 0 0 cn File Name : 99 &NorthDrive Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 Int. Total 880 236 0.932 SR 99 Southbound NORTH DRIVEWAY Westbound SR 99 Northbound NORTH DRIVEWAY Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right A Total Left Thru Right APP. Total Left Thru Right APP. Total Left Thru Right oral Total f 1 i 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 0 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:30 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 05:15 PM 0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 O 11 0.0 100.0 O 1 O 7 11 7 0.393 O 829 0.0 95.4 O 219 40 4.6 16 05:30 PM O 219 16 869 235 235 0.924 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 SR 99 Out In . Total 1 0 1 840 1 1 1 01 01 01 RIg ht Thru Left +' 1 8401 01 North 9/14/2004 5:00:00 PM 9/14/2004 5:45:00 PM Unshifted Left Thru Right 1 01 8291 401 1 1 1 1 8691 Out In Total SR 99 1 8691 2 a 0 0 0 cn File Name : 99 &NorthDrive Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 Int. Total 880 236 0.932 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 06:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 , 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 1 11 0 0 22 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 1.3 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Groups Printed- Unshifted 2 7 1 1 11 22 1.3 0.0 0.0 198 198 219 214 829 1606 94.5 93.3 11 6 5 3 16 8 8 5 40 19 209 203 235 222 869 94 50 1699 5.6 5.5 98.7 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No 0.0 0.0 0.0 99&NorthDrive 00000000 9/14/2004 1 5 3 6 5 19 211 210 238 223 880 218 213 242 228 899 60 1721 1771 2.8 97.2 i I i i I I 1 I i i i i I i SR 99 Southbound NORTH DRIVEWAY Westbound SR 99 Northbound NORTH DRIVEWAY Eastbound Start Time Left Thru �9h t HV APP' Tota Left Thru Rlgh t HV APP' Total Left Thru Rlgh t HV APP. Total Left Thou Rtgh t HV APP. Total Total Total 11101u. Total Int. Total Pater 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1:0 `0 1.0 04:00PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 198 18 8 214 _ 0 0 0 0 8 218 228 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 199 14 9 213 0 0 0 0 0 9 216 225 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 180 13 8 193 0 0 0 0 0 8 195 203 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 199 11 8 210 0 0 0 0 0 8 212 218 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 778 64 31 830 0 0 0 0 0 31 841 872 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 06:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 , 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 1 11 0 0 22 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 1.3 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 Groups Printed- Unshifted 2 7 1 1 11 22 1.3 0.0 0.0 198 198 219 214 829 1606 94.5 93.3 11 6 5 3 16 8 8 5 40 19 209 203 235 222 869 94 50 1699 5.6 5.5 98.7 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No 0.0 0.0 0.0 99&NorthDrive 00000000 9/14/2004 1 5 3 6 5 19 211 210 238 223 880 218 213 242 228 899 60 1721 1771 2.8 97.2 i I i i I I 1 I i i i i I i 1 1 i i Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 0 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:45 Volume 0 0 0 Peek Factor High Int 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 05:30 PM 0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 0 0.0 0 64 100.0 19 0 20 64 19 20 0.800 0 0.0 0 04:45 PM 0 O 9 0.0 100.0 O 3 0 3 9 3 3 0.750 0 O 0 0 O 0 ms 1' o! i SR 99 Out 1 I In 01 Total I 1 01 01 1 of Right T Left f 01 North 1 641 3/14/2004 4:45:00 PM 3/14/2004 6:30:00 PM Unshifted 4 1 T 1 Left Thru Right 1 ( 01 01 1 91 I 9 1 Out In Total SR 99 9 t 4 -. 2 m 0 0 a. C..3 C C � G rr a v File Name : 99 &SouthDrive Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 2 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 Int. Total 73 22 0.830 SR 99 Southbound SOUTH DRIVEWAY Westbound SR 99 Northbound SOUTH DRIVEWAY Eastbound Start lime Left Thru Right map- Left Thru Right Left Thru Right' Left Thru Right APP. 1 1 i i Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 0 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:45 Volume 0 0 0 Peek Factor High Int 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 05:30 PM 0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 - 251 -0300 0 0.0 0 64 100.0 19 0 20 64 19 20 0.800 0 0.0 0 04:45 PM 0 O 9 0.0 100.0 O 3 0 3 9 3 3 0.750 0 O 0 0 O 0 ms 1' o! i SR 99 Out 1 I In 01 Total I 1 01 01 1 of Right T Left f 01 North 1 641 3/14/2004 4:45:00 PM 3/14/2004 6:30:00 PM Unshifted 4 1 T 1 Left Thru Right 1 ( 01 01 1 91 I 9 1 Out In Total SR 99 9 t 4 -. 2 m 0 0 a. C..3 C C � G rr a v File Name : 99 &SouthDrive Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 2 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 Int. Total 73 22 0.830 Start Time Factor SR 99 Southbound Left 1.0 Thru 1.0 Rlgh 1.0 1.0 APP. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH DRIVEWAY Westbound SR 99 Northbound Left 1.0 Thru 1:0 Rlgh HV 1.0 1.0 A PP . Left Total Thru 1.0 RIgh 1.0 HV 1.0 APP. Total SOUTH DRIVEWAY " Eastbound Left 1.0 Thru 1.0 Righ 1.0 HV 1.0 APP. Total O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Exotu. Total Inclu. Total Int. Total 0 18 16 O 12 12 O 14 14 1 22 23 Total 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0.0 1.0 O 0 16 0 15 0 0 - 1 0 1 O 0 12 0 12. 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 13 0 13 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 19 0 19 0 0 3 1 3 O 69 0 59 0 6 1 6 0 13 0 13 0 3 0 3 O 12 0 12 0 2 0 2 O 20 0 20 0 1 0 1 O 14 0 14 0 1 0 1 0 '69 0 59 0 7 0 7 0.0 0.0 All Traffic Data Services Inc. 1800 NE 40th Ave J -1 Renton, WA 98056 Ph. 206 -251 -0300 O 118 0 118 0.0 100. .0 0 0.0 90.8 90.8 Groups Printed- Unshifted 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 1 12 100. 0 9.2 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 File Name : 99&SouthDrive Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 9/14/2004 Page No : 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 99.2 64 65 18 14 21 15 68 16 14 21 15 68 1 130 131 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix B: Level Of Service Calculations at Study Intersections Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Engineering NorthWest 2004 Existing November 1, 2004 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 152nd St & SR 99 Movement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) 40 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 40 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% Turn Type Split Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 8.5 Effective Green, g (s) 8.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary EBL HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 4- k- I t d EBT EBR. WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1900 4.0 1.00 0.98 0.99 1801 0.99 1801 80 1.00 80 8 132 2% 0.60 28.7 1.00 4.3 33.0 C 33.0 C 4TH 1900 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.98 0.98 3453 0.98 3453 20 80 76 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 80 76 0 0 21 0 0 163 2% 0% 0% Split 4 8 8 20.7 0.61 69.2 58.7% 15 6.9 6.9 0.10 4.0 3.0 344 c0.05 0.47 29.4 1.00 1.0 30.5 C 30.5 C Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service ARCO Expansion - Tukwila 11/1/2004 2004 Existing (PM Peak) ++ 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 3539 0.95 1.00 1770 3539 28 236 600 1.00 1.00 1.00 28 236 600 0 0 0 0 236 600 0% 2% 2% Prot 5 2 14.1 14.1 0.20 4.0 3.0 361 c0.13 0.65 25.3 1.00 4.2 29.5 C HCM Level of Service 36.0 36.0 0.52 4.0 3.0 1841 0.17 0.33 9.6 1.00 0.5 10.1 B 15.3 B r 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 28 1.00 28 13 15 2% Perm 2 36.0 36.0 0.52 4.0 3.0 824 0.01 0.02 8.0 1.00 0.0 8.1 A C 16.0 B 1.8 23.7 1.8 23.7 0.03 0.34 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 46 1197 0.01 c0.22 0.52 0.63 33.3 19.1 1.00 1.00 10.3 2.5 43.5 21.6 D C 22.2 C 11/1/2004 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1770 3495 0.95 1.00 1770 3495 24 696 64 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 696 64 0 7 0 24 753 0 2% 2% 2% Prot 1 6 Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 154th St & SR 99 Movement EBL Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1665 Fit Permitted 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1665 Volume (vph) 284 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 284 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 246 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% Turn Type Split 'Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.1 Effective Green, g (s) 13.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 348 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.71 Uniform Delay, dl 23.0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.4 Delay (s) 29.4 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT : - WBR, • NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 41 F 'I 14 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1740 1568 1595 3221 1752 3505 1568 1805 3610 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1740 1568 1595 3221 1752 3505 1568 1805 3610 220 320 184 260 96 128 568 68 132 764 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 220 320 184 260 96 128 568 68 132 764 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 53 0 0 258 320 172 319 0 128 568 15 132 764 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 0% 0% Free Split Prot Perm Prot 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 13.1 13.1 0.21 4.0 3.0 364 c0.15 0.71 23.0 1.00 6.2 29.2 C 18.0 B 11.8 11.8 0.19 4.0 3.0 1568 301 c0.11 Free 62.6 62.6 1.00 c0.20 0.20 0.0 1.00 0.3 0.3 A 25.0 0.67 62.6 65.6% 15 0.57 23.1 1.00 2.6 25.7 11.8 11.8 0.19 4.0 3.0 607 0.10 0.53 22.9 1.00 0.8 23.7 C C 24.3 C ARCO Expansion - Tukwila 11/1/2004 2004 Existing (PM Peak) 6.1 6.1 0.10 4.0 3.0 171 0.07 0.75 27.5 1.00 16.3 43.8 D HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 14.0 14.0 0.22 4.0 3.0 784 0.16 0.72 22.5 1.00 3.3 25.9 C 28.3 C 2 14.0 14.0 0.22 4.0 3.0 351 0.01 0.04 19.1 1.00 0.1 19.1 B C 12.0 C 7.7 7.7 0.12 4.0 3.0 222 c0.07 0.59 26.0 1.00 4.2 30.2 C 15.6 15.6 0.25 4.0 3.0 900 c0.21 11/1/2004 0.85 22.4 1.00 7.5 29.9 C 28.5 C Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2 i 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1615 1.00 1615 132 1.00 132 82 50 0% Perm 0.03 0.12 18.2 1.00 0.1 18.4 B I i 1 i 6 15.6 15.6 0.25 4.0 3.0 402 i i i i i I i i I i TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TENW Agency /Co. Date Performed 10/27/04 Analysis Time Period PM Peak, Intersection Military Rd & SR 99 Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2004 Existing Project Description ARCO Expansion - Tukwila East/West Street: Military Road North/South Street: SR 99 Intersection Orientation: North- South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 864 0 0 796 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 864 0 0 796 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 0 0 232 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 232 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service . Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (vph) 232 C (m) (vph) 869 v/c 0.27 95% queue length 1.08 Control Delay 10.6 LOS B Approach Delay -- — 10.6 Approach LOS — -- B 1 1 1 1 Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic impact Analysis Transportation Engineering North West 2005 Without Project November 1, 2004 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 152nd St & SR 99 Movement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary EBL HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 11/1/2004 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1800 3427 1770 3539 1583 1770 3508 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1800 3427 1770 3539 1583 1770 3508 77 20 62 62 34 192 590 51 106 718 45 0.87 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.97 89 23 74 74 40 204 628 54 109 740 46 9 0 0 34 0 0 0 29 0 5 0 147 0 0 154 0 204 628 25 109 781 0 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Split Prot Perm Prot 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 2 9.1 6.9 12.1 30.9 30.9 5.1 23.9 9.1 6.9 12.1 30.9 30.9 5.1 23.9 0.13 0.10 0.18 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.35 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 241 348 315 1608 719 133 1233 c0.08 • c0.04 c0.12 0.18 0.06 c0.22 0.02 0.61 0.44 0.65 0.39 0.03 0.82 0.63 27.8 28.7 26.0 12.3 10.3 31.0 18.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.5 0.9 4.5 0.7 0.1 31.0 2.5 32.3 29.6 30.5 13.0 10.4 62.0 20.9 C C CB B EC 32.3 29.6 16.9 25.9 C C B C 38 0.87 44 0 0 2% Split 4 22.9 0.61 68.0 56.0% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service C 16.0 B ARCO Expansion - Tukwila 11/1/2004 2005 Without Project (PM Peak) Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 154th St & SR 99 Movement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Wit. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prat) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) f 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1665 0.95 1665 302 0.94 321 0 261 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.6 Effective Green, g (s) 13.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 352 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.74 Uniform Delay, dl 23.8 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.2 Delay (s) 31.9 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 3% Split 4 4 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 4 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.99 1733 0.99 1733 201 0.94 214 0 274 3% 13.6 13.6 0.21 4.0 3.0 366 c0.16 0.75 23.8 1.00 8.1 31.9 C 20.3 C r 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1568 1.00 1568 290 0.94 309 0 309 3% Free 11.6 11.6 0.18 4.0 3.0 1568 287 c0.10 Free 64.4 64.4 1.00 c0.20 0.20 0.0 1.00 0.3 0.3 A 32.0 0.75 64.4 69.4% 15 1900 4.0 0.91 1.00 0.95 1595 0.95 1595 140 0.88 159 0 159 3% Split 8 0.55 24.0 1.00 2.3 26.4 C 41 1900 4.0 0.91 0.95 1.00 3195 1.00 3195 235 0.88 267 78 316 3% 8 11.6 11.6 0.18 4.0 3.0 575 0.10 0.55 24.0 1.00 1.1 25.1 C 25.5 C 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1752 3505 0.95 1.00 1752 3505 112 179 492 0.88 0.95' 0.95 127 188 518 0 0 0 0 188 518 3% 3% 3% 7.0 7.0 0.11 4.0 3.0 190 c0.11 0.99 28.7 1.00 61.6 90.2 F HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service ARCO Expansion - Tukwila 11/1/2004 2005 Without Project (PM Peak) t Prot 5 2 17.5 17.5 0.27 4.0 3.0 952 0.15 0.54 20.0 1.00 0.6 20.7 C 37.1 D r 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1568 1.00 1568 73 0.95 77 56 21 3% Perm 2 17.5 17.5 0.27 4.0 3.0 426 0.01 0.05 17.3 1.00 0.0 17.4 B C 12.0 C r 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1805 3610 1615 0.95 1.00 1.00 1805 3610 1615 114 833 164 0.96 0.96 0.96 119 868 171 0 0 94 119 868 77 0% 0% 0% Prot Perm 1 6 5.7 5.7 0.09 4.0 3.0 160 0.07 0.74 28.6 1.00 17.0 45.6 D 16.2 16.2 0.25 4.0 3.0 908 c0.24 11/1/2004 0.96 23.7 1.00 19.8 43.5 D 40.2 D 6 16.2 16.2 0.25 4.0 3.0 406 Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2 I I 1 I I 1 i i 0.05 0.19 18.9 1.00 0.2 19.2 B i i I I I I i TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information • Site Information Analyst TENW Agency /Co. Date Performed 10/27/04 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Military Rd & SR 99 Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Without Project Project Description ARCO Expansion - Tukwila East/West Street: Military Road North /South Street: SR 99 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 • Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 832 0 0 801 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 885 0 0 834 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — -- 0 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 . L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 0 0 311 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 345 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (vph) 345 C (m) (vph) 876 v/c 0.39 95% queue length 1.90 Control Delay 11.8 LOS B Approach Delay -- -- 11.8 Approach LOS — — B 1 1 1 Rights Reserved HCS2000 Version 4. Id Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. Id ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic impact Analysis r Transportation Engineering NorthWest 2005 With Project November 1, 2004 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 152nd St & SR 99 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 4 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 0.98 0.99 1800 0.99 1800 38 77 0.87 0.87 44 89 0 9 0 147 2% 2% Split 4 4 " st d 4- 4. 4\ 9.1 9.1 0.13 4.0 3.0 241 c0.08 0.61 27.8 1.00 4.5 32.3 C 32.3 C 4t 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.95 3427 1770 0.98 0.95 3427 1770 20 62 62 34 193 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.94 23 74 74 40 205 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 154 0 205 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% Split Prot 8 8 5 23.0 0.61 68.0 56.1% 15 6.9 6.9 0.10 4.0 3.0 348 c0.04 0.44 28.7 1.00 0.9 29.6 C 29.6 C 12.1 12.1 0.18 4.0 3.0 315 c0.12 0.65 26.0 1.00 4.8 30.7 C HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 1770 3508 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 1770 3508 593 51 106 721 45 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.97 631 54 109 743 46 0 29 0 5 0 631 25 109 784 0 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Perm Prot 2 1 6 2 30.9 30.9 5.1 23.9 30.9 30.9 5.1 23.9 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.35 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1608 719 133 1233 0.18 0.06 c022 0.02 0.39 0.03 0.82 0.64 12.3 10.3 31.0 18.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.7 0.1 31.0 2.5 13.0 10.4 62.0 20.9 B B E C 17.0 25.9 B C C 16.0 B 11/1/2004 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila 11/1/2004 2005 With Project (PM Peak) Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 154th St & SR 99 Movement Lane Configurations ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prat) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) .f Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.7 Effective Green, g (s) 13.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.74 Uniform Delay, dl 23.5 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 Delay (s) 31.2 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1665 0.95 1665 304 0.94 323 0 262 3% Split 4 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1733 1568 1595 3196 1752 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1733 1568 1595 3196 1752 13.7 13.7 0.21 4.0 3.0 371 c0.16 202 290 155 238 112 179 0.94 0.94 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.95 215 309 176 270 127 188 0 0 0 76 0 0 276 309 176 321 0 188 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Free . Split Prot 4 8 8 5 Free 64.0. 64.0 1.00 0.74 23.5 1.00 7.9 31.4 C 20.0 B 12.0 12.0 0.19 4.0 3.0 1568 299 c0.11 c0.20 0.20 0.0 1.00 0.3 0.3 A 33.7 0.81 64.0 69.5% 15 0.59 23.7 1.00 3.0 26.7 C 4-- 1 12.0 12.0 0.19 4.0 3.0 599 0.10 0.54 23.5 1.00 0.9 24.4 C 25.1 C 6.1 6.1 0.10 4.0 3.0 167 c0.11 1.13 29.0 1.00 107.4 136.4 F HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 11/1/2004. NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR ++ r ++ r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 '1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 3505 1568 1805 3610 1615 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 3505 1568 1805 3610 1615 496 73 129 823 164 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 522 77 134 857 171 0 61 0 0 94 522 16 134 857 77 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% Perm Prot Perm 2 1 6 2 6 13.7 13.7 8.6 16.2 16.2 13.7 13.7 8.6 16.2 16.2 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.25 0.25 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 750 336 243 914 409 0.15 0.07 c0.24 0.70 23.2 1.00 2.8 26.0 C 51.8 D 0.01 0.05 20.0 1.00 0.1 20.0 C C 16.0 C 0.55 25.9 1.00 2.7 28.6 C 0.94 23.4 1.00 16.5 39.9 D B 35.6 D 0.05 0.19 18.7 1.00 0.2 19.0 ARCO Expansion - Tukwila 11/1/2004 2005 With Project (PM Peak) Synchro 6 Report Transportation Engineering Northwest Page 2 i i i i I i I i i i i I i i I i 1 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TENW Agency /Co. Date Performed 10/27/04 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Military Rd & SR 99 Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 With Project Project Description ARCO Expansion - Tukwila East/West Street: Military Road • North /South Street: SR 99 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 836 0 0 804 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 889 0 0 837 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 0 0 313 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 347 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (vph) 347 C (m) (vph) 858 v/c 0.40 95% queue length 1.98 Control Delay 12.0 LOS B Approach Delay -- — 12.0 Approach LOS — -- B 1 HCS3000 Copyright © 2003 Unive sity of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. i ARCO Expansion - Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix C: Site Access Level of Service and Queue Calculations r Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 1, 2004 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TENW Agency /Co. Date Performed 10/27/04 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection SR 99 & ARCO Driveway Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 With Project Project Description ARCO Expansion - Tukwila East/West Street: ARCO Driveway North /South Street: SR 99 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L - T R L T R Volume 0 829 62 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.96 0.96 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 901 65 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR T Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 83 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 92 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (vph) 92 C (m) (vph) 877 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.35 Control Delay 9.6 LOS A Approach Delay — — 9.6 Approach LOS — — A 1 1 1 1 Rights Reserved HCS3oo0TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TENW Agency /Co. Date Performed 10/27/04 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection S 154th St & ARCO • Driveway Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 With Project Project Description ARCO Expansion - Tukwila EastNWest Street S 154th Street North /South Street: ARCO Driveway Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 54 325 0 0 405 44 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 0. 91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 57 345 0 0 445 48 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHI/ 2 — — 0 — -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 0 0 0 20 0 64 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0 .85 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 0 0 23 0 75 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PM, 0 0 0 2 0 2 Percent grade ( %) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 57 98 Capacity, c (vph) 1067 581 v/c ratio 0.05 0.17 Queue length (95 %) 0.17 0.60 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.6 12.4 LOS A B Approach delay (s/veh) — — 12.4 Approach LOS — — B GENERAL PROJECT NOTES A ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF BP ARCO CODE OF SAFE PRACTICES. ALL PERSONS WORKING ON SIZE MUST COMPLETE THE SAFETY TRAINING AND POSESS A VAUD BP PASSPORT CARD. B. THE TERM 'PROVIDE' SHALL MEAN 'FURNISH AND INSTALL' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: 1. TEMPORARILY AIINTAIN UNTIL U COUPLET AND FUNCTIONING REQUIRED IADESIGNED UNIT. 2 FUMES AND DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED SO AS TO PREVENT ANY HARMFUL OR UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. 3. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL ON A REGULAR BASS, THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT REMOVE ALL RUBBISH, SURPLUS MATERIAL TOOLS. AND SCAFFOLDING IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN AN ORDERLY WORKING ENVIRONMENT. C. SAFETY: THE RESPONSIBLE FOR CCOONDDR10NS SHALL THE JOB SITE. COMPLETELY SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY IS INCLUDED DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AND SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UNITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. D. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND PROTECT THEM AS REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL REPAIR ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PAINT SPECIFICATIONS PAINT NEW BUMPER POSTS, PIC BUMPER POSTS, AND ALL BUMPER POSTS ON SITE WITH C.01 BP YELLOW BY ICI DEVOE BASE /DC 389 F 8030. PAINT NEW ISLAND FORMS WITH C.12 BP WARM GRAY BY ICI DEVOE ADC 378 B 9501. PAINT EXISTING CANOPY COLUMNS BLACK TO MATCH EXISTING. FOR LOCAL ICI DEVOE RETALL LOCATIONS CONTACT BP FIELD ENGINEER. ARCO (BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, L.L.C.) FUELING CANOPY, PIPING, AND DISPENSER UPGRADE PROJECT FACILITY NO. 5515 15252 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SO. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 ,GENERAL NOTES 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE WORK AS INDICATED N THESE PLANS. 2. COMPLETE IN INSTALLATION PROJECT, INSTALL WHETHER OR EQUIPMENT NOT THE EQUIIP REQUIRED MENT IS PROVIDED BY BP, THE CONTRACTOR(S) OR 'OTHERS'. 3. THE PRODUCT, STAGE II AND VENT PIPING LAYOUT ILLUSTRATED IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AN EXACT REPRESENTATION OF THE ACTUAL CONTRACTOR PIPING INSTALLATION TO R A SYSTEM RELOCATE, NSI NT WI MODIFY THE ADJUST NTENT OF THE DESIGN. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST PREPARE AND PROVIDE 'AS- BUILT" DRAWINGS UPON COMPLETION OF PIPING INSTALLATION, AND PROVIDE TO BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS. PER SHEET G.0.2. 4. THESE PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. THE GENERAL SCOPE OF THE PROJECT IS DEFINED AND THE BP /GLOBAL ALLIANCE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ALTER OR EXPAND THE SCOPE OF WORK. 5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE (ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE) TO THE FACILITY, DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR S TO PROVIDE A DUMPSTER, ADDITIONAL HARD HATS AND BARRICADES DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION PHASES. 7. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO CLEAN-UP AND HAUL AWAY ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS. DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH BP STANDARDS, FEDERAL. STATE. MID LOCAL CODES. B. G.C. TO PROVIDE 4 HOURS ASSISTANCE DURING STORE REOPENING. 9. ALL FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT SUPPUED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT MUST COMPLY _WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990' AND STATE RELATED CODE. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SAID STATUTES BOTH AS SUPPLIED TO AND AS INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT SITE. 10. IF STORE IS TO REMAIN CLOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BOARDING UP THE WINDOWS, RESTRICTING ENTRY INTO THE STORE TO NECESSARY PERSONNEL ONLY, AND KEEPING THE STORE ACCESS AREA CLEAN. 11. RESTROOMS IN THE STORE ARE NOT FOR CONTRACTOR USE. 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE DRAWINGS: o. CONCRETE - REGULAR WEIGHT HARD ROCK CONCRETE (150LBS /CU FT) b. CEMENT - TYPE II, SULFATE RESISTANT c. AGGREGATES - ASTY C33, (MAXIMUM SIZE 3/4 INCHES) d. ALTHOUGH COP C GR R AD DE E FOR DURABILITY. STRUCTURE P. O.•BE THIS IS A 2,500 P.S.I. PER STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS. U.B.C. 1701(0)1. EX. 2. e. SLUMP - 3' ♦ 1' -4' MAXIMUM AT POINT OF PLACEMENT I. SHRINKAGE - 0.058 MAXIMUM 2 CONCRETE SLAB THICKNESS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 6.0 INCHES (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE DRAWINGS) 3. CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT WITH A MIX OF 1: 2 1/2: 3 1/2', WITH A MAXIMUM OF 7 1/2 GALLONS OF WATER PER SACK. 4. REINFORCING FOR DRNE SLABS SHALL BE FIBER MESH. SUMP CAGES SHALL BE 13 REPAIR TOP AND BOTTOM. MAINTAIN CONCRETE IN A MOIST CONDITION FOR AT LEAST 7 DAYS AFTER 5. PLACEMENT. PLACE DIRECTLY FROM TRUCK INTO FORMS, DO NOT PUMP CONCRETE UNLESS 6. SPECIAL INSPECTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 3 OF THE UBC IS PROVIDED. SUBMIT MIX DESIGNS, WITH STRENGTH AND SHRINKAGE TEST RESULTS, TO THE BP 7 FIELD ENGINEER AT LEAST 7 DAYS BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE ,FUELING AND DRIVE SLAB CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS B. CONSOLIDATE IN PLACE USING A MECHANICAL VIBRATOR. 9. BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE, SECURE REINFORCING STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS. DOWELS, AND OTHER INSERTS IN POSITION TO PREVENT MOVEMENT. 10. MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO A.C.I. -318 (SPECIFICATIONS OF THE DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE) 11. FOR BLACK CONCRETE COLOR ADMIX: LM. SCOFIELD COMPANY 'CHOMIX', STANDARD AND RETARDER TYPES AS ADMIXTURES, EOUIRED FOR THE FIELD PLACING CONDITIONS, OR PRIOR APPROVED EQUAL NOTE SURFACE APPUED BLACK PAINT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. • NOT APPLICABLE UNLESS PATCHING INTO EXISTING 'BLACK CONCRETE. NOTE THAT 'GREY (NON - COLORED) CONCRETE IS STANDARD 12. CEMENT FOR THE ENDRE PROJECT SHALL BE SAME TYPE AND BRAND, AND FROM SAME MILL AGGREGATE BOTH FINE AND COURSE. SHALL BE SUPPLIED FROM ON SOURCE. MIX DESIGN SHALL REMAIN CONSTANT FOR ALL COLORED CONCRETE. SLUMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 INCHES. 13. MILERS TRANSPORTING CONCRETE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED PRIOR TO LOADING COLORED CONCRETE. 14. PIGMENTS SHALL BE ADDED TO MIX AT THE PLANT, AND SHALL BE MEASURED ACCURATELY. THE MIXER SHALL BE OPERATING AT CHARGING SPEED FOR 5 TO 10 MINUTES WHILE COLOR IS BEING ADDED. CODE INFORMATION PERMIT JURISDICTION: BUILDING CODE IBC 2003 EDITION MECHANICAL CODE IMC 2003 EDITION PLUMBING COOL IPC 2003 EDITION ELECTRICAL CODE: NEC 2002 EDITION FIRE CODE: IFC 2003 EDITION ACCESIBIUTY: WASHINGTON ENERGY CODE WASHINGTON STATE APPLICABLE CODE PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT : A FUELING FACILITY UPGRADE PROJECT LOCATED AT 15252 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH, TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 98188 SCOPE: DEMOLITION AND INSTALLATION OF NEW GAS ISLAND CANOPY, INSTALLA7ON OF NEW FUEL ISLAND DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INSTALLATION OF NEW TANK SUMPS AND TANK TOP EQUIPMENT. FLEXIBLE PRODUCT PIPING. NEW DISPENSERS, DISPENSER SUMPS, ISLANDS, SINGLE-WALL VENT AND VAPOR RECOVERY PIPING. MONITORING SYSTEM, CONCRETE SLABS, AND ASPHALT. PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER: BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC. (ARCO) 4 CENTERPOINT DRIVE LA PAW. CALIFORNIA 90623 TEL (714) 670 -5300 CONTACT: MITCH NOFTSGER 0 (206) 465 -0096 ENGINEER: BARGNAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 TEL: (425) 251 -6222 CONTACT: DAVID CARROLL (425) 656 -7448 ENGINEER THE ENGINEER FOR THE FUEL SYSTEM AND PO SIT T E ALTERATIONN THE GC PERMIT READY DRAWINGS BE RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ,BY BP AND OTHERS CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL WORK PERFORMED BY IMPROPER INSTALLATION OR WIRI NGWILL BE BILLED DUE THE CONTRACTOR. 1. TANK /UNE TESTING 2. POS SET -UP CONTRACTOR TO START -Up AND CERTIFY INSTALLATION USING AN AUTHORIZED SERVICE CONTRACTOR FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 3. DISPENSER WARRANTY START -UP 4. VEEDER ROOT WARRANTY START -UP 5. FE PETRO WARRANTY START -UP 6. POWER BOX SOLUTIONS WARRANTY START -UP SHEET INDEX T1 -1 TITLE SHEET & PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS C -1 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN D51 -1 UNDERGROUND TANK & PIPING DEMOLITION SITE PLAN DS1 -2 PIPING TK1 -T UNDERGROUND TANK A PIPING INSTALLA ON SITE PLAN G.0.22 TA NO PIPIN S��pPE OF WORK AND GENERAL NOTES (1 OF (2 OF 2) G.0.3 UST SYSTEM CHECKLIST G.0.5 GENERAL NOTES & MISC. DETAILS G.0.6 VENT STACK DETAILS G.0.7 CONCRETE JOINT DETAILS G.O.B TANK FILL & VAPOR RISER STATIC GROUNDING DETAILS M.5.1.1 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS UST (1 DF 2) M.5.1.2 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS UST (2 OF 2) M.5.2.6 TYPICAL S'e, 12.000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL FIBERGLASS TANK M.5.3.5 UST INSTALLATION (3) B'e 12K BLENDING M.5.9.15 TURBINE SIDE SUMPS AND PIPING INSTALLATION DETAILS M5.9.23 FILL SIDE SUMPS INSTALLATION DETAILS (VR- 102 -D) M.5.9.24 SIPHON PIPING INSTALLATION DETAILS IA.5.9.2B WAYNE AND TOKHEIM DISPENSER ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC WIRING DIAGRAMS M.5.9.30 VEEDER ROOT AND FE PETRO INTERFACE FIELD WIRING AND DETAILS (2022 CONFIGURATION) M.5.9.36 DISPENSER DETAILS: WAYNE OVATION 812 BLENDER M.5.9.54 MASTER-SLAVE 1ST WITH SIPHONED US'S VEEDER ROOT PROGRAMMING ES1 -1 FUEUNG SYSTEM ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ES1 -2 FUELING SYSTEM PANEL & CONDUIT SCHEDULES E2 -2 FUEL SYSTEfl ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM E2 -3 LEAK DETECTION & ELECTRICAL DETAILS E2 -4 TANK MONITORING SCHEMATIC E2 -5 . ELECTRICAL .UTERNLS UST CAI -1 CANOPY FLOOR PLAN CA1-2 CANOPY REFI.ECTED CEILING PLAN CA2 -T CANOPY ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS • El CANOPY FRAMING PLAN E2 CANOPY ELEVATION E3 ' CANOPY SF_QTION F1 ` CANOPY FOUNDATION PLAN GENERAL CONTRACTOR • SCOPE OF WORK 1. DEMOLITION: LLAO4 ID o. REMOVE DIS LNG 44'X32' GAS ISLAND CANOPY & ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. b. REMOVE ALL (12) EXISTING PRODUCT DISPENSERS. c. REMOVE ALL (6) EXISTING FUEL ISLANDS d. REMOVE ALL (4) EXISTING FUEL ISLAND BOLLARDS. e. REMOVE EXISTING FUELING SLAB. I. REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK SUB. 9. REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING NECESSARY TO REMOVE UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT AND INSTALL NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK PRODUCT, STAGE 2 PIPING, VENT PIPING AND RISERS AND ELECTRICAL A. REMOVE ALL EXISTING PRODUCT AND STAGE 2 PIPING. i. REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK VENT PIPING AND RISERS. j. REMOVE EXISTING (4) UNDEGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK RELATED MANHOLES, SUMPS. RISERS, TURBINES. ETC. k. REMOVE COSTING FUEL SYSTEM ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR /CONDUIT, PANELS. ETC. AS /IF NECESSARY. I, REMOVE DUSTING DAMAGED/DETERIORATING ASPHALT PAVING (NOT RELATED TO FUELING PROJECT) AS CALLED FOR. m. REMOVE EXISTING PARKING LOT STRIPING /SYMBOLS AS CALLED FOR. 2. CONSTRUCTION 3 56K a. INSTALL NEW 84' X 56' GAS ISLAIbD CANOPY. b. INSTALL NEW RELATED TANK CONTAINMENT SUMPS. MANWAYS, TURBINES, RISERS, BUCKETS, ETC. c. INSTALL NEW (6) UNDER DISPENSER CONTAINMENT SUMPS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT. A. INSTALL NEW DOUBLE -WALL FLEXIBLE PRODUCT LINES. INCLUDING UNLEADED A. INSTALL NEW CROSSOVER GLE U SINGLE-WALL STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY FIBERGLASS PIPING. I. INSTALL NEW UNDEGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK SINGLE-WALL FIBERGLASS VENT PIPING AND RISERS. 9. INSTALL NEW FUELING MONITORING S1atOA INCLUDING OVERFILL ALARM, LEVEL PROBES, SUMP SENSORS, AND PLLD'S. A. INSTALL NEW /MODIFY EXISTING FUELING SYSTEM RELATED ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR /CONDUIT /PANELS, ETC. L CONSTRUCT NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK SLAB. j. CONSTRUCT NEW FUELING CANOPY DRIVE SLAB. I. INSTALL NEW ASPHALT PAVING AS NECESSARY TO REPLACE PAVING REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. m. INSTALL NEW (6) WAYNE VSBO PRODUCT DISPENSERS. n. INSTALL NEW PARKING LOT STRIPING /SYMBOLS AS CALLED FOR. ARCO IW1hACOMTII1001=3I2 NUANCE =MR AGENT TOR Bovis G /obaJAlliance commMfEUOW UMW ACAtam NAMON.L RID ADAPT COMBATANT: 1= PU NO NO =ON S OGLIS1S 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 ( 425) 251 -6222 A DATE OCITOW se, a ®R ma WAN R 88 1p°aL V6.0 3M/04 Mad OESCAIOII TEAL intEllEKIISQUEMEMEn ROT 10 �� m. as a i �n MOW I VI ONA 00.11.0 1:0 INC 00•0017 1 . 1 1001[ 1N0 MM. 1070 101770. • 0071:6S /AO KM. 077 1100•07 07:17•43 10 Off 0•07 /0•17 FlO110 00003 Ain 0 1701 O.* or mars mon PPM 70 YE 17 • 0107/13 000 OM 700417 aESELGAINT IKON/ATOM UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK STANDARDS ELEMEWTTPOI V{ 2004 SERIES AMERICAN STANDARDS NNE MOW= 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. Q 154th St Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC *5515 WING 140E 98 s EfOt IB =WEND W PRMECI NM BCE #2369 RAMO MIL TITLE SHEET a PROJECTSPECIRCATIONS Re CEjVFO OFLT Aa C c V S a V. a a ., A ‹,__.... „ Vicinity Map GENERAL PROJECT NOTES A ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF BP ARCO CODE OF SAFE PRACTICES. ALL PERSONS WORKING ON SIZE MUST COMPLETE THE SAFETY TRAINING AND POSESS A VAUD BP PASSPORT CARD. B. THE TERM 'PROVIDE' SHALL MEAN 'FURNISH AND INSTALL' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: 1. TEMPORARILY AIINTAIN UNTIL U COUPLET AND FUNCTIONING REQUIRED IADESIGNED UNIT. 2 FUMES AND DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED SO AS TO PREVENT ANY HARMFUL OR UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. 3. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL ON A REGULAR BASS, THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT REMOVE ALL RUBBISH, SURPLUS MATERIAL TOOLS. AND SCAFFOLDING IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN AN ORDERLY WORKING ENVIRONMENT. C. SAFETY: THE RESPONSIBLE FOR CCOONDDR10NS SHALL THE JOB SITE. COMPLETELY SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY IS INCLUDED DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AND SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UNITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. D. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND PROTECT THEM AS REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL REPAIR ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PAINT SPECIFICATIONS PAINT NEW BUMPER POSTS, PIC BUMPER POSTS, AND ALL BUMPER POSTS ON SITE WITH C.01 BP YELLOW BY ICI DEVOE BASE /DC 389 F 8030. PAINT NEW ISLAND FORMS WITH C.12 BP WARM GRAY BY ICI DEVOE ADC 378 B 9501. PAINT EXISTING CANOPY COLUMNS BLACK TO MATCH EXISTING. FOR LOCAL ICI DEVOE RETALL LOCATIONS CONTACT BP FIELD ENGINEER. ARCO (BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, L.L.C.) FUELING CANOPY, PIPING, AND DISPENSER UPGRADE PROJECT FACILITY NO. 5515 15252 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SO. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 ,GENERAL NOTES 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE WORK AS INDICATED N THESE PLANS. 2. COMPLETE IN INSTALLATION PROJECT, INSTALL WHETHER OR EQUIPMENT NOT THE EQUIIP REQUIRED MENT IS PROVIDED BY BP, THE CONTRACTOR(S) OR 'OTHERS'. 3. THE PRODUCT, STAGE II AND VENT PIPING LAYOUT ILLUSTRATED IS DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AN EXACT REPRESENTATION OF THE ACTUAL CONTRACTOR PIPING INSTALLATION TO R A SYSTEM RELOCATE, NSI NT WI MODIFY THE ADJUST NTENT OF THE DESIGN. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST PREPARE AND PROVIDE 'AS- BUILT" DRAWINGS UPON COMPLETION OF PIPING INSTALLATION, AND PROVIDE TO BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS. PER SHEET G.0.2. 4. THESE PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. THE GENERAL SCOPE OF THE PROJECT IS DEFINED AND THE BP /GLOBAL ALLIANCE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ALTER OR EXPAND THE SCOPE OF WORK. 5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE (ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE) TO THE FACILITY, DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR S TO PROVIDE A DUMPSTER, ADDITIONAL HARD HATS AND BARRICADES DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION PHASES. 7. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO CLEAN-UP AND HAUL AWAY ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS. DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH BP STANDARDS, FEDERAL. STATE. MID LOCAL CODES. B. G.C. TO PROVIDE 4 HOURS ASSISTANCE DURING STORE REOPENING. 9. ALL FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT SUPPUED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT MUST COMPLY _WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990' AND STATE RELATED CODE. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SAID STATUTES BOTH AS SUPPLIED TO AND AS INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT SITE. 10. IF STORE IS TO REMAIN CLOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BOARDING UP THE WINDOWS, RESTRICTING ENTRY INTO THE STORE TO NECESSARY PERSONNEL ONLY, AND KEEPING THE STORE ACCESS AREA CLEAN. 11. RESTROOMS IN THE STORE ARE NOT FOR CONTRACTOR USE. 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE DRAWINGS: o. CONCRETE - REGULAR WEIGHT HARD ROCK CONCRETE (150LBS /CU FT) b. CEMENT - TYPE II, SULFATE RESISTANT c. AGGREGATES - ASTY C33, (MAXIMUM SIZE 3/4 INCHES) d. ALTHOUGH COP C GR R AD DE E FOR DURABILITY. STRUCTURE P. O.•BE THIS IS A 2,500 P.S.I. PER STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS. U.B.C. 1701(0)1. EX. 2. e. SLUMP - 3' ♦ 1' -4' MAXIMUM AT POINT OF PLACEMENT I. SHRINKAGE - 0.058 MAXIMUM 2 CONCRETE SLAB THICKNESS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 6.0 INCHES (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE DRAWINGS) 3. CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT WITH A MIX OF 1: 2 1/2: 3 1/2', WITH A MAXIMUM OF 7 1/2 GALLONS OF WATER PER SACK. 4. REINFORCING FOR DRNE SLABS SHALL BE FIBER MESH. SUMP CAGES SHALL BE 13 REPAIR TOP AND BOTTOM. MAINTAIN CONCRETE IN A MOIST CONDITION FOR AT LEAST 7 DAYS AFTER 5. PLACEMENT. PLACE DIRECTLY FROM TRUCK INTO FORMS, DO NOT PUMP CONCRETE UNLESS 6. SPECIAL INSPECTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 3 OF THE UBC IS PROVIDED. SUBMIT MIX DESIGNS, WITH STRENGTH AND SHRINKAGE TEST RESULTS, TO THE BP 7 FIELD ENGINEER AT LEAST 7 DAYS BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE ,FUELING AND DRIVE SLAB CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS B. CONSOLIDATE IN PLACE USING A MECHANICAL VIBRATOR. 9. BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE, SECURE REINFORCING STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS. DOWELS, AND OTHER INSERTS IN POSITION TO PREVENT MOVEMENT. 10. MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO A.C.I. -318 (SPECIFICATIONS OF THE DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE) 11. FOR BLACK CONCRETE COLOR ADMIX: LM. SCOFIELD COMPANY 'CHOMIX', STANDARD AND RETARDER TYPES AS ADMIXTURES, EOUIRED FOR THE FIELD PLACING CONDITIONS, OR PRIOR APPROVED EQUAL NOTE SURFACE APPUED BLACK PAINT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. • NOT APPLICABLE UNLESS PATCHING INTO EXISTING 'BLACK CONCRETE. NOTE THAT 'GREY (NON - COLORED) CONCRETE IS STANDARD 12. CEMENT FOR THE ENDRE PROJECT SHALL BE SAME TYPE AND BRAND, AND FROM SAME MILL AGGREGATE BOTH FINE AND COURSE. SHALL BE SUPPLIED FROM ON SOURCE. MIX DESIGN SHALL REMAIN CONSTANT FOR ALL COLORED CONCRETE. SLUMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 INCHES. 13. MILERS TRANSPORTING CONCRETE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED PRIOR TO LOADING COLORED CONCRETE. 14. PIGMENTS SHALL BE ADDED TO MIX AT THE PLANT, AND SHALL BE MEASURED ACCURATELY. THE MIXER SHALL BE OPERATING AT CHARGING SPEED FOR 5 TO 10 MINUTES WHILE COLOR IS BEING ADDED. CODE INFORMATION PERMIT JURISDICTION: BUILDING CODE IBC 2003 EDITION MECHANICAL CODE IMC 2003 EDITION PLUMBING COOL IPC 2003 EDITION ELECTRICAL CODE: NEC 2002 EDITION FIRE CODE: IFC 2003 EDITION ACCESIBIUTY: WASHINGTON ENERGY CODE WASHINGTON STATE APPLICABLE CODE PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT : A FUELING FACILITY UPGRADE PROJECT LOCATED AT 15252 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH, TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 98188 SCOPE: DEMOLITION AND INSTALLATION OF NEW GAS ISLAND CANOPY, INSTALLA7ON OF NEW FUEL ISLAND DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INSTALLATION OF NEW TANK SUMPS AND TANK TOP EQUIPMENT. FLEXIBLE PRODUCT PIPING. NEW DISPENSERS, DISPENSER SUMPS, ISLANDS, SINGLE-WALL VENT AND VAPOR RECOVERY PIPING. MONITORING SYSTEM, CONCRETE SLABS, AND ASPHALT. PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER: BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC. (ARCO) 4 CENTERPOINT DRIVE LA PAW. CALIFORNIA 90623 TEL (714) 670 -5300 CONTACT: MITCH NOFTSGER 0 (206) 465 -0096 ENGINEER: BARGNAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 TEL: (425) 251 -6222 CONTACT: DAVID CARROLL (425) 656 -7448 ENGINEER THE ENGINEER FOR THE FUEL SYSTEM AND PO SIT T E ALTERATIONN THE GC PERMIT READY DRAWINGS BE RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ,BY BP AND OTHERS CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL WORK PERFORMED BY IMPROPER INSTALLATION OR WIRI NGWILL BE BILLED DUE THE CONTRACTOR. 1. TANK /UNE TESTING 2. POS SET -UP CONTRACTOR TO START -Up AND CERTIFY INSTALLATION USING AN AUTHORIZED SERVICE CONTRACTOR FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 3. DISPENSER WARRANTY START -UP 4. VEEDER ROOT WARRANTY START -UP 5. FE PETRO WARRANTY START -UP 6. POWER BOX SOLUTIONS WARRANTY START -UP SHEET INDEX T1 -1 TITLE SHEET & PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS C -1 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN D51 -1 UNDERGROUND TANK & PIPING DEMOLITION SITE PLAN DS1 -2 PIPING TK1 -T UNDERGROUND TANK A PIPING INSTALLA ON SITE PLAN G.0.22 TA NO PIPIN S��pPE OF WORK AND GENERAL NOTES (1 OF (2 OF 2) G.0.3 UST SYSTEM CHECKLIST G.0.5 GENERAL NOTES & MISC. DETAILS G.0.6 VENT STACK DETAILS G.0.7 CONCRETE JOINT DETAILS G.O.B TANK FILL & VAPOR RISER STATIC GROUNDING DETAILS M.5.1.1 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS UST (1 DF 2) M.5.1.2 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS UST (2 OF 2) M.5.2.6 TYPICAL S'e, 12.000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL FIBERGLASS TANK M.5.3.5 UST INSTALLATION (3) B'e 12K BLENDING M.5.9.15 TURBINE SIDE SUMPS AND PIPING INSTALLATION DETAILS M5.9.23 FILL SIDE SUMPS INSTALLATION DETAILS (VR- 102 -D) M.5.9.24 SIPHON PIPING INSTALLATION DETAILS IA.5.9.2B WAYNE AND TOKHEIM DISPENSER ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC WIRING DIAGRAMS M.5.9.30 VEEDER ROOT AND FE PETRO INTERFACE FIELD WIRING AND DETAILS (2022 CONFIGURATION) M.5.9.36 DISPENSER DETAILS: WAYNE OVATION 812 BLENDER M.5.9.54 MASTER-SLAVE 1ST WITH SIPHONED US'S VEEDER ROOT PROGRAMMING ES1 -1 FUEUNG SYSTEM ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ES1 -2 FUELING SYSTEM PANEL & CONDUIT SCHEDULES E2 -2 FUEL SYSTEfl ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM E2 -3 LEAK DETECTION & ELECTRICAL DETAILS E2 -4 TANK MONITORING SCHEMATIC E2 -5 . ELECTRICAL .UTERNLS UST CAI -1 CANOPY FLOOR PLAN CA1-2 CANOPY REFI.ECTED CEILING PLAN CA2 -T CANOPY ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS • El CANOPY FRAMING PLAN E2 CANOPY ELEVATION E3 ' CANOPY SF_QTION F1 ` CANOPY FOUNDATION PLAN GENERAL CONTRACTOR • SCOPE OF WORK 1. DEMOLITION: LLAO4 ID o. REMOVE DIS LNG 44'X32' GAS ISLAND CANOPY & ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. b. REMOVE ALL (12) EXISTING PRODUCT DISPENSERS. c. REMOVE ALL (6) EXISTING FUEL ISLANDS d. REMOVE ALL (4) EXISTING FUEL ISLAND BOLLARDS. e. REMOVE EXISTING FUELING SLAB. I. REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK SUB. 9. REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING NECESSARY TO REMOVE UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT AND INSTALL NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK PRODUCT, STAGE 2 PIPING, VENT PIPING AND RISERS AND ELECTRICAL A. REMOVE ALL EXISTING PRODUCT AND STAGE 2 PIPING. i. REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK VENT PIPING AND RISERS. j. REMOVE EXISTING (4) UNDEGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK RELATED MANHOLES, SUMPS. RISERS, TURBINES. ETC. k. REMOVE COSTING FUEL SYSTEM ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR /CONDUIT, PANELS. ETC. AS /IF NECESSARY. I, REMOVE DUSTING DAMAGED/DETERIORATING ASPHALT PAVING (NOT RELATED TO FUELING PROJECT) AS CALLED FOR. m. REMOVE EXISTING PARKING LOT STRIPING /SYMBOLS AS CALLED FOR. 2. CONSTRUCTION 3 56K a. INSTALL NEW 84' X 56' GAS ISLAIbD CANOPY. b. INSTALL NEW RELATED TANK CONTAINMENT SUMPS. MANWAYS, TURBINES, RISERS, BUCKETS, ETC. c. INSTALL NEW (6) UNDER DISPENSER CONTAINMENT SUMPS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT. A. INSTALL NEW DOUBLE -WALL FLEXIBLE PRODUCT LINES. INCLUDING UNLEADED A. INSTALL NEW CROSSOVER GLE U SINGLE-WALL STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY FIBERGLASS PIPING. I. INSTALL NEW UNDEGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK SINGLE-WALL FIBERGLASS VENT PIPING AND RISERS. 9. INSTALL NEW FUELING MONITORING S1atOA INCLUDING OVERFILL ALARM, LEVEL PROBES, SUMP SENSORS, AND PLLD'S. A. INSTALL NEW /MODIFY EXISTING FUELING SYSTEM RELATED ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR /CONDUIT /PANELS, ETC. L CONSTRUCT NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANK SLAB. j. CONSTRUCT NEW FUELING CANOPY DRIVE SLAB. I. INSTALL NEW ASPHALT PAVING AS NECESSARY TO REPLACE PAVING REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. m. INSTALL NEW (6) WAYNE VSBO PRODUCT DISPENSERS. n. INSTALL NEW PARKING LOT STRIPING /SYMBOLS AS CALLED FOR. ARCO IW1hACOMTII1001=3I2 NUANCE =MR AGENT TOR Bovis G /obaJAlliance commMfEUOW UMW ACAtam NAMON.L RID ADAPT COMBATANT: 1= PU NO NO =ON S OGLIS1S 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 ( 425) 251 -6222 A DATE OCITOW se, a ®R ma WAN R 88 1p°aL V6.0 3M/04 Mad OESCAIOII TEAL intEllEKIISQUEMEMEn ROT 10 �� m. as a i �n MOW I VI ONA 00.11.0 1:0 INC 00•0017 1 . 1 1001[ 1N0 MM. 1070 101770. • 0071:6S /AO KM. 077 1100•07 07:17•43 10 Off 0•07 /0•17 FlO110 00003 Ain 0 1701 O.* or mars mon PPM 70 YE 17 • 0107/13 000 OM 700417 aESELGAINT IKON/ATOM UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK STANDARDS ELEMEWTTPOI V{ 2004 SERIES AMERICAN STANDARDS NNE MOW= 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. Q 154th St Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC *5515 WING 140E 98 s EfOt IB =WEND W PRMECI NM BCE #2369 RAMO MIL TITLE SHEET a PROJECTSPECIRCATIONS Re CEjVFO OFLT Aa C c V S a V. a a CLINE A IL 1 r ARCO lDesrmASr1.1muela us ALLIANCE 14YfE11. ARM. S 01'49'12' W PL -8.41 1D -20' FENCE LINK CHAIN NEW 3' WIDE CONC. ED X GUTTER SS 0 10 (TYPJ EDGE OF FISTING SLAB TO REMOVED SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN REPLACE EX. I pCuDl MEET AND 0001 EC CURB TYPE 1 CATCH RIY -335.4 IE ■332.9 N 88'10.48• w PL-800 Pacific Highway South (SR 1) WV • EX. ARCO SIGN S I W low -- - 150,90 10 W yam SAWCUT - YATCH EX. EXISTING GRADE SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR PROPOSED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT SWALE NEW STORM DRAIN PIPE NEW CATCH BASIN 26.50± SITE DEVELOPMENT CALLOUTS 1. ALL WORK SMALL BE w ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUXWI A STANDARDS AND SPECLFlGTLONS. NG 2. EXISTI PAVEMENT BASE COURSE MATERIAL SWILL BE SALVAGED FOR REUSE AS DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BY FIELD ENGINEER AND /OR 5045 ENGINEER. 3. ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. /L11 P. Lela Mme G /oba/Alliance �evlamleomt urAVAUm DATE MOON Dfsol+DS, w 0 izt MAU sammemeuruxamoaa .osil■OL MO MOW ■CROM 70 MR. Kt WM. MOOS 0 1•01 11C 10514” IP VO001.0 MIS M. & 8 L S. GP 2} m5E i �wl �w /� lexr�kss n -01 • opt � lE141eP1e1n 1fal11An01t WE /CORM 15252 Pacific H So. Q 154th Street Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #5515 ®m R w1u,a me ®R ML ! IFf1t OA_ R M11NR 1! BCE #2369 uAODq 1mmA: ME IMPROVEMENT PLAN 9W NQ R CCCM2D r 27 2ln5 C1 -1 REMOVE LOW LEVEL UGHT AND POLE S 88 E N 8$10'48' LOT LIGHT (TIP ) PARALLEL PARKING TO REMAIN \ PRELIMINARY CANOPY EXTENSION PLAN • TRAFF SIGNAL — NOTE TANK HOLE WATER AT THIS SITE IS 12'- ® CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING API RONAN THE NEW MONITORING SYSTEM. ® REMOVE CANOPY COWMN CLADDING AND TRANS. CLADDING WILL NO LONGER BE USED WITH NEW CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN VISITORS UDC - ON S Vicinity Map 6' DEEP. TANK BURY IS FROM 53 i' TO 61'. MONITORING SYSTEM IN BUILDING. RUN NEW CONDUITS TO ORT TO ARCO SEATTLE TERMINAL FOR STORAGE. CANOPY, DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. 0 Ah■ IF ARCO Bovis Land Lewis G/obalAlliance RAnOUI ME MINT WNSILTN(F. Lao MSC Mno 019RI SPECLuarr 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 {425) 251 -6222 ne. L A VIER COAST IROOICTS. IIC MYMn12 -NUDFR ADDIT FOR 8P: CEIRER'OOIRIIIBW LA POLKA UI® DATE DIMMED m _0 MO re ago BR R JYW Y°®t V6.0 3/1 /04 iaM031 o[samrni e1Dm0. N. 71, 0090 900 9•909 09199 0903 9999 9999 9191 A.. .8 IMO PM 118181.3 11191 1999 9 99 9 0 9001( 9019 ID 00 001, 991 919 in 10 19 1:09 911190, ommort won. lo 140 9 0099 09 9 9 199 90051 01104 11. 9191 1099 9949 9 901 019 /0 99 0 01109 CO 00 09 00199 Or 9 9100 A01100 10. 1 090. 9901 00 911. CEIEIDAEMT pRVWAT -! UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK STANDARDS ELEMENTTPO1 V$ 2004 SERIES AMERICAN STANDARDS ME ADDLE: 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. (q 154t1 SL Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #5515 Mona Milt BP EISt MUM= - MEN Pft BCE #2369 uuvq ant: CANOPYEXauIStON PLAN RFr DEMOLITION NOTES NOTE THIS ISLAND LAYOUT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF CURRENT FUEUNG ISLAND CONFIGURATIONS. SITE SPECIFIC CONDMONS MAY VARY. HOWEVER IT IS THE INTENT OF THE OWNER FOR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM ALL WORK REQUIRED TO DELNER A COMPLETE AND OPERABLE REVISED PRODUCT PIPING DELIVERY SYSTEM. INCLUDING ANY INCIDENTAL DEMOLITION ACTIVMES AS REQUIRED; WHETHER OR NOT SPECIALLY INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. O CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE (4) EXISTING GILBARCO B79 DISPENSERS. INTERFACE BOXES, AND ASSOCIATED HANGING HARDWARE AND TRANSPORT TO ARCO SEATTLE TERMINAL FOR STORAGE. REMOVE UNDER DISPENSER CONTAINMENT SUMPS (IF PRESENT) AND ALL PIPING CONNECTIONS TO DISPENSERS. ALL HOSES AND NOZZLES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND GIVEN TO STORE MANAGER. EXISTING BREAKERS IN ELECTRICAL PANEL IN BLDG. TO TO REMOVED. EXISTING ISOLATION RELAYS IN BLDG. TO BE REMOVED. CD CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD LOCATE. INTERCEPT AND CUT EXISTING CONDUIT ROUTED TO REMOVED DISPENSERS AT A CONVENIENT LOCATION. REMOVE ALL WIRING BACK TO PANEL ROUTE ALL UNUSED CONDUIT TO CANOPY COLUMN AND CAP. ® CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVE SLAB AND REINFORCING AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING PRODUCT, VAPOR RECOVERY, VENT PIPING AND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT LOCATIONS BEFORE DEMOLITION WORK COMMENCES. LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING RAISED CONCRETE PUMP ISLANDS. ® REMOVE ALL PRODUCT, VENT AND VAPOR RECOVERY PIPING ENCOUNTERED INCLUDING ANY OLD ABANDONED STEEL PIPING IF FOUND AND FOLLOW ALL GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF THE PIPING INCUDING PROPER DOCUMENTATION TO BP. REMOVE 4TH ANNULAR VENT PIPING AND RISER AT BUILDING. PATCH BUILDING AS REQUIRED. CD CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND REINSTALL EXISTING ISLAND BUMPER POSTS (TIP. 4 LOCATIONS). Q INTERCEPT DRNN UNES AND RUN TO NEW CANOPY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED. ® CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT AND REMOVE ALL MISCELLANEOUS ASPHALT AS SHOWN AND AS AFFECTED BY THE DRIVE SLAB. ISLAND AND PIPING REMOVAL. AS WELL AS. OTHER MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS ON SITE AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S ENGINEER. SAW CUT CLEAN ALL ADJACENT ASPHALT BEFORE PATCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETELY REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE TANK SLAB AND REINFORCING AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SIX FOOT HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE TO REMAIN ON SITE AROUND ENTIRE WORK AREA TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY DURING PROJECT DURATION. INSTALL NE FOLLOWING SIGNAGE ON FENCING: 1.) HARD HAT REROUIRED 2.) AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY 3.) ALL VISITORS MUST SIGN IN. 4.) TDAPORARY CLOSED FOR CONSTRUCTION BANNER ® CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALTERNATE BID PRICING TO PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING ASPHALT AT LOCATIONS SHOWN. ® EXISTING PIC UNITS TO BE REMOVED AND STORED /PROTECTED FOR REINSTALLATION. SEE SCOPE OF WORK FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. ® PROTECT UNDERGROUND REMEDIATION WELLS. PIPING AND MANWAYS. ADJUST AND RESTORE TO CONDITIONS AFFECTED BY PROJECT. ® CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH EXISTING 32 X 44' CANOPY COMPLETE WITH FOUNDATIONS. Legend E)OST. r F.G SNQ,E WALL PRODUCT PIPING TO BE REMOVED 2 OR S F.G SINGLE WALL VAPOR RECOVERY PIPING TO BE REMOVED 2 F.G. SINGLE WALL VENT PIPING (REMOVE AS REWIRED) EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVE AND TANK SLAB TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED ,RL.L (NO SUMP EXISTING) ¢r Ru cD X2 77005 DS1 -1 CUM A frh. 1 r ARCO ■ =MOW PRDOLT7, uc ALL R= YAMMER. 08017 KW P. Bovis Lend Lease G /oba /Alliance 4®DDIPO M PLLADILX23 MAIRHAL SITE ID•P• rasLTNO: P G HA O = S Q g• & (?-11 ENGIN 1/0 P18881/). NO DESIGN PPEQALIM 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -6222 NL DAR REMLOI GEIG®IIOI E. E k OF YPO a i l X 1h \` e- 1 OF YPD (1 �- E l OF YPO ( 4' -11" POST (--, (✓ 0 1 1 1!!1 A A EJ A a . S• )1 p4 BA I tP ±+, 26327 Q f F Fl Sit0.4a V4�' /0 EXPIRES 01 -07 -05 II U80Y1111Nm RAITLPNT IF mean TT voila TIMM. NcestrAws Mr COMMXT 10 1M MIMI. 0 MOD IT M MD TIM MOMT/L 40 10MMT/ MRCS TT MIMI *1 MAMMA 70 IV MO WE MIMI. IV IC DEgJAprt R6UWAIIOrt FUEL ISLAND CANOPY DRAWINGS AND DETAILS ME ADOE52 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. 0/154th Tukwlia, ashington 98188 FAC #5515 Doom 18 ma NAN CE Wit 0 ®R ma IV KM WIN M LTA AID= N! 3/tJ04 Po=AM BCE #2369 COMM ant CANOPY FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILS SWEET N0: CA1 -1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" a 1' -0• Building Side • Street Side Notes: 1. DOWN SPOUTS ARE DESIGNED TO BE TIGHTUNED TO THE SITES UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. GRADING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COMPENSATE TO PERMIT DAYUGHTING OF PIPE IN SAFE LOCATION AS PERMITTED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. 2. DRIVE SLAB SHALL HAVE A MEDIUM BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO ISLAND LAYOUT W /EXPANSION AND CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN. 3. CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOWN SPOUTS AND CONDUITS FOR UGHTING IN COLUMNS WHERE SPECIFIED. COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR EXACT LOCATION OF CONDUITS, AND HAND HOLES PRIOR TO FABRICATION. SEE DETAIL 4. ISLAND HEIGHTS SHALL BE THE SAME IN EACH ROW. 5. ISLAND FORMS SHALL BE PAINTED B.P. GRAY 6. SEE SHEET CA1 -2 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES. 7. NEW 23' CANOPY EXTENSION BY FREY MOSS STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SITE AND COORDINATE WITH FREY MOSS FOR INSTALLATION OF THE CANOPY STRUCTURE. FOR SCOPE OF WORK SEE DWG El TO E3 FOR CANOPY DETAILS. CONTACT LEE DRUMMOND. FREY MOSS STRUCTURES AT (760)221 -8764 TO COORDINATE CANOPY WORK. 8. CONTRACTOR TO LAYOUT, EXCAVATE, AND INSTALL NEW CANOPY COLUMN FOUNDATIONS AS INDICATED ON SHEET F1. 9. CANOPY CONTRACTOR TO RUN NEW DRAIN PIPING IN CANOPY COLUMNS AND TERMINATE AT BASE OF NEW COLUMNS. CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT THE NEW DRAINS FROM THE EXTENDED CANOPY INTO THE EXISTING STORM SYSTEM. ORIGINAL DESIGNED LOCATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN PIPING SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL PIPING LOCATIONS TON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.' LEUM RESISTANT SEALANT 3/4" DEEP (MIN.) O 7 P.I.C. Bumper Post Detail SCALE: 3/4" 1' -0" NEW PAVEMENT SCALE: 3/4" - 1' -0" SCALE: 3 1' -0 .7 ,O 1 THICK 12 GA. INSTRUCTIONAL ^ SIGN SUPPORT POST WELDED TO POST BY MFR. iIJIT III - 'r — r-1.1- ' „'. - % TO F= II fl ' ' I II E . ti l lI' ° I II II- IL- 11 •I 111 .. _= iLT �t'- d ^ � I -. I F-J 1 -III - - 1� -III -I I _ iT . TENT.- IIAI_I*II: 7- 11 C Island Bumper Post Detail 6' MIN. LAP 3/8" JOINT MESH /REINF. ED Expansion Joint G.C. TO FILL W/ CONCRETE SLURRY AND PAINT WHITE 3 1/2 "0 STANDARD BLACK PIPE, BEND 187 ON A 10" Q RADIUS G.C. TO FILL W CONC. SLURRY AND PAINT WHITE 6" CONC. DRIVE SLAB 12" THICK x 20" DEEP N 30" LONG BOLLARD FOOTING 4-4 "0 PREFAB BUMPER POST FURNISHED BY ARCO G.C. TO FILL W/ CONCRETED I C UNIT/ SLURRY AND PAINT WHITE CLAD DING r ISLAND FORM BEYOND I SEE CONCRETE DRIVE SLAB 1/4" RADIUS TOOL EDGE JOINT FILLER CAST IN PLACE #4 AT 18" O.C. BOTH WAYS AT SLAB MIDPOINT TF- MPD DOWNSPOUT TS COLUMN EXPANSION JOINT SEE CORE HOLE de CONTAINMENT BOX SEE TK DWGS. Island Section SCALE: 3/4" ' -0" FOUNDATIO MEM MEI �i ■_ HOME RUN CONDUIT SEE SCALE: 1" •• I' -0 'PREVENTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'- PETROLEUM RESISTANT SEALANT 3/4" DEEP (MIN.) Downspout Exit /Continuation Control Joint SCALE: 3" - 1' -0' 1/4" SAWCUT W/ FLARED EDGE EASER VARIES 4" MIN. 9" MAX. CANOPY CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND DOWNSPOUT BEYOND COLUMN WITH MALE THREADED PIPE G TO CONNECT AND EXTEND TO ULTIMATE DOWNSPOUT DESTINATION, SEE SITE PLAN AND NOTE # 1, THIS SHEET RECEIVE ilitt 27 10f ion 6-8" 17 -0" 12'-O 17-0" 12' -0" 5 -6" ) -6" k OF YPO a i l X 1h \` e- 1 OF YPD (1 �- FACE OF CANOPY FRAMING (j e--1 l OF YPO ( 4' -11" POST (--, (✓ 1 1 1!!1 EJ II [ COLUMN/ SLAB LA RGED ENLARGED DETAIL ELECTRICAL CONDUITS ELECTRICAL DWGS. & BUMPER POST W/O SIGN M. OF 8 REFER TO SHEET TK1 -1 FOR DISPENSER PRODUCT CONFIGURATION EJ -JOINT CONTRO L e �- CENTER POINT OF CANOPY 8 3 UNE OF CANOPY FRAMING ABOVE C JOINT EXPANSION e JOINT 1- BUMPER POST VATH TYPICAL G OF 4 SEEe (T"AP. g e" THICK REINFORCED DRIVE SLAB W / #4'S EACH WAY OVER 4 CONCRETE�/ AT 18" O.C. CRUSHED ROCK OR AS SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT 3" DIA PVC DOWN SPOUT IN COLUIAN BY CANOPY CONTRACTOR SEE DETAIL �3 OF 4) �:J o !� ° (I 1 I =L ���� .1 1 1 r --� ( � EJ I /l 3y -- MULTI PRODUCT DISPENSER W/ INTERCOM TYP. OF 6 v . / J II UNE OF COLUMN I FOUNDATION BELOW SEE STRUCT. DWG. 4 I 3" DIA. DOWN SPOUT J JA. CONTINUATION BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR SEE NOTE 1 AND DETAIL (TIP. OF 4) I 4.2 61' ' T "PREVEI PETR -0" DINE SUB TYP. / FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" a 1' -0• Building Side • Street Side Notes: 1. DOWN SPOUTS ARE DESIGNED TO BE TIGHTUNED TO THE SITES UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. GRADING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO COMPENSATE TO PERMIT DAYUGHTING OF PIPE IN SAFE LOCATION AS PERMITTED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. 2. DRIVE SLAB SHALL HAVE A MEDIUM BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO ISLAND LAYOUT W /EXPANSION AND CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN. 3. CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOWN SPOUTS AND CONDUITS FOR UGHTING IN COLUMNS WHERE SPECIFIED. COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR EXACT LOCATION OF CONDUITS, AND HAND HOLES PRIOR TO FABRICATION. SEE DETAIL 4. ISLAND HEIGHTS SHALL BE THE SAME IN EACH ROW. 5. ISLAND FORMS SHALL BE PAINTED B.P. GRAY 6. SEE SHEET CA1 -2 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES. 7. NEW 23' CANOPY EXTENSION BY FREY MOSS STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SITE AND COORDINATE WITH FREY MOSS FOR INSTALLATION OF THE CANOPY STRUCTURE. FOR SCOPE OF WORK SEE DWG El TO E3 FOR CANOPY DETAILS. CONTACT LEE DRUMMOND. FREY MOSS STRUCTURES AT (760)221 -8764 TO COORDINATE CANOPY WORK. 8. CONTRACTOR TO LAYOUT, EXCAVATE, AND INSTALL NEW CANOPY COLUMN FOUNDATIONS AS INDICATED ON SHEET F1. 9. CANOPY CONTRACTOR TO RUN NEW DRAIN PIPING IN CANOPY COLUMNS AND TERMINATE AT BASE OF NEW COLUMNS. CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT THE NEW DRAINS FROM THE EXTENDED CANOPY INTO THE EXISTING STORM SYSTEM. ORIGINAL DESIGNED LOCATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN PIPING SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL PIPING LOCATIONS TON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.' LEUM RESISTANT SEALANT 3/4" DEEP (MIN.) O 7 P.I.C. Bumper Post Detail SCALE: 3/4" 1' -0" NEW PAVEMENT SCALE: 3/4" - 1' -0" SCALE: 3 1' -0 .7 ,O 1 THICK 12 GA. INSTRUCTIONAL ^ SIGN SUPPORT POST WELDED TO POST BY MFR. iIJIT III - 'r — r-1.1- ' „'. - % TO F= II fl ' ' I II E . ti l lI' ° I II II- IL- 11 •I 111 .. _= iLT �t'- d ^ � I -. I F-J 1 -III - - 1� -III -I I _ iT . TENT.- IIAI_I*II: 7- 11 C Island Bumper Post Detail 6' MIN. LAP 3/8" JOINT MESH /REINF. ED Expansion Joint G.C. TO FILL W/ CONCRETE SLURRY AND PAINT WHITE 3 1/2 "0 STANDARD BLACK PIPE, BEND 187 ON A 10" Q RADIUS G.C. TO FILL W CONC. SLURRY AND PAINT WHITE 6" CONC. DRIVE SLAB 12" THICK x 20" DEEP N 30" LONG BOLLARD FOOTING 4-4 "0 PREFAB BUMPER POST FURNISHED BY ARCO G.C. TO FILL W/ CONCRETED I C UNIT/ SLURRY AND PAINT WHITE CLAD DING r ISLAND FORM BEYOND I SEE CONCRETE DRIVE SLAB 1/4" RADIUS TOOL EDGE JOINT FILLER CAST IN PLACE #4 AT 18" O.C. BOTH WAYS AT SLAB MIDPOINT TF- MPD DOWNSPOUT TS COLUMN EXPANSION JOINT SEE CORE HOLE de CONTAINMENT BOX SEE TK DWGS. Island Section SCALE: 3/4" ' -0" FOUNDATIO MEM MEI �i ■_ HOME RUN CONDUIT SEE SCALE: 1" •• I' -0 'PREVENTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'- PETROLEUM RESISTANT SEALANT 3/4" DEEP (MIN.) Downspout Exit /Continuation Control Joint SCALE: 3" - 1' -0' 1/4" SAWCUT W/ FLARED EDGE EASER VARIES 4" MIN. 9" MAX. CANOPY CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND DOWNSPOUT BEYOND COLUMN WITH MALE THREADED PIPE G TO CONNECT AND EXTEND TO ULTIMATE DOWNSPOUT DESTINATION, SEE SITE PLAN AND NOTE # 1, THIS SHEET RECEIVE ilitt 27 10f ion z V O - z SCALE: 1/4" - I • -O" SPARK UNE OF ACM GRAPHICS PANELS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A Building Side 64' -0" CANOPY FRUING FACE OF CANOPY FRAMING 15' -O Street Side SPARK - SPARK SEAL DECK TO COLLAR Canopy Ceiling and General Notes 1) ALL CEIUNG DECK SHALL BE 20 GA. PREFINISHED TO .MATCH AM /PM WHITE ROLLED PANS WITH 3 -INCH HIGH RIBS AT 16 INCHES O.C. PANELS SHALL BE WATERTIGHT INTERLOCKING SECTIONS CUPPED TO CANOPY FRAME PER STRUCTURAL DWGS. OR PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 2) ALL EXPOSED METAL SURFACES UNDER CANOPY, INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED TO, CORNICES, RAINWATER LEADER COVERS AND COLUMN TRIM SHALL BE PRE - FINISHED TO MATCH CEIUNG DECK. SEE DETAIL •� -. TS COLUMN 4 O Column Collar Detail SCALE: 1 1/2" -1 -0" 3) CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OPENINGS IN DECK AND INSTALL LIGHT FIXTURES. 4) FASCIA GRAPHICS BACKING AND FLASHING SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CANOPY CONTRACTOR. ACM GRAPHICS, BLUE TRIM, SPARK ETC ARE PROVIDED BY ARCO'S GRAPHICS CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT UNLESS CANOPY AND GRAPHICS CONTRACTOR ARE THE SAME ENTRY. 5) CANOPY CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DRAINAGE AND OVERFLOW FOR CANOPY ROOF INCLUDING, BUT NOT UNITED TO, GUTTERS, RAINWATER LEADERS. OVERFLOWS. DOWNSPOUTS AND SUITABLE CONNECTION STUBS AT COLUMN BASE WHERE C.C. SHALL THEN EXTEND TO THE SITE'S DRAINAGE SYSTEM. SEE CA1 -1 NOTE #1. 6) THE CANOPY SHALL BE ERECTED IN TWO STAGES: STAGE 1: CANOPY CONTRACTOR TO FINISH ANCHOR BOLTS AND TEMPLATES FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S INSTALLATION PRIOR TO POURING FOUNDATIONS. WHEN FOUNDATIONS HAVE SET, CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL COLUMNS AND SECURE THEM TO FOUNDATIONS. COLUMNS SHALL BE STABLE. PLUMB AND TRUE. STAGE 2: AFTER DRNESLAB AND SURROUNDING GRADE IS EITHER PAVED OR STABLE BASE HAS BEEN INSTALLED. CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL COME BACK TO THE SITE TO COMPLETE THE CANOPY. CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT COLUMNS HAVE REMAINED PLUMB PRIOR TO COMMENCING CANOPY ROOF INSTALLATION. 7) ALL CONDUIT INSTALLED BY CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL SHALL PULL ROPES AND SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S ELECTRICIAN TO MAKE CONNECTIONS. 8) STUB OUT 1 "0 SURVOLLANCE CAMMERA CONDUITS AT 1B" - BELOW UNDERSIDE OF CANOPY CEILING, AT PIC SIDE OF 8x10 COLUMNS. 2 %3"C20 GA. PREFINISHED COLLAR AT COLUMN I SURVEILLANC CAMERA CONDO 1" UGHTNG CONDUIT I- 3 -1/2" DIA BUMPER POSTS, SEE TS 10 "x10 "x3 /16" W/ 12%12%1/4" PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM ANCHOR BOLTS PER PIC MANUFACTURERS TEMPLATE CONDUITS FOR PIC SEE CA1 -1 Light Detail SCALE 1 1/2" - 1' -0" 23 1/4" SCALE 3/4" - 1' -0" BALL TURN. FIXTURE 1B 1 /B "x6 -5 B "x6" HIGH LOCKING COLLAR FURNISHED W/UGHT 3" HIGH (MAX.) 3" METAL DECK RIBS CEIUNG CANOPY COLUMN 3" DIA. DOWNSPOUT Column /PIC O Plan Enlargement SCALE: 3/4" - 1' -0" UGHT TRIM & LENS FURNISHED W /FIXTURE 14 5/16 "414 5/16 "x6" HIGH SEE BUMPER � \ � 12' -6'+ 4 - 2 " NAM PIC Foundation /Post Detail ACM CLADDING PIC HOME RUNS FOR Pic UNIT AND 1/2" CONDUITS RECEIVED rim 27 20B' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ak■ le ARCO MOT COOT PRODCT% UC NUANCE MAMMON DDONT PM P. Bovis Lend Leine G /oba/Alliance +1}]DD180111 DRIVE u/NY ►CAI= MA11011•L 9EE CPT TAINSATNMT. 1N00 RAMOID No DE90M 9EG,ATD' 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 )425) 251 -6222 A NO DATE IRM9011 DERt®1O4 A A A .x'•EIDTYNN DY ATA1ONNP 140 119 OP WO 1,1001107 100,11770•00 101 0001110 020001 •107007 417,00 070 10 Dor oso ono. egg.. ppg 1■01 110■17 10 an 0007 1000, /00 MAO. 0011:101 NT TO MOO 07113 Of NO 007471 De 10./10 OECEI.DRENT DDCAYATCIt FUEL ISLAND CANOPY DRAWINGS AND DETAILS 911 MODEMS 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. @ 154th St Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #5515 DmOW DE OBO COOED DD 0B0 MARL DD .W WESSON 3/1 /04 OUNCE teat IP 10% AMINCE Mt BC #2369 DDNO10 1TDL• CANOPY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AND DETAILS SHEET NO CA1 -2 l (_ —0— OF LIGHT FIXTURE 4 —0— OF LIGHT FIXTURE — —0— C OF UGHT FIXTURE —0 C OF UGHT FIXTURE UGHT ,8-,Y , E IN COLUMN REQUIREMENTS IN COLUMN REQUIREMENTS 1 1" CONDUIT FOR UGHRNG OR FUTURE 2 3/4" CONDUITS FOR PIC HOME RUNS 2 112" CONDUITS FROM J -BOX TO PIC / 1 3 DIA. DOWNSPOUT i 1 1" CONDUIT FOR CAMERA ( 1 1 CONDUIT FOR LIGHTING OR FUTURE (2 CONDUITS FOR PIC HOME RUNS (2 CONDUITS FROM J- BOX TO PIC 1 DOWNSPOUT 1 CONDUIT FOR CAMERA - - - - r U +I "I +I Y.B 1 . 1 11 , 4 I _0_ I TYPtCAL AT COLUMN X 20 GA. DECK TRIM PENETRATION. SEE ANGLE I I —O— —O— I I ROOF DECK RIB DIRECTION / AT ROOF BY C.C. I — ©_ C UGHT FIXTURE SEIM-RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE LSI 320 M.M. "SCOTTSDALE ". TYP. OF 16. SEE DETAIL AND NOTE 2 UNE OF 12" WIDE X 20 GA. CORNICE/GUTTER -+ UNE OF FASCIA PANELS 58' -0' CANOPY FRAMING X (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.) 1Y \ CEN TER CAN P \ OF CANOPY 20 GA. PRE FINISHED EMBOSSED ROOF DECK 1" CAMERA CONDUIT & I —O— SPARK 3" WIDE X 12" LONG OVER E7(IT VERT FACE 1/2" CONDUITS k OR PIC POWER I AND COMMUNICATION BY G.C. —O— — O — I IN COLUMN REQUIREMENTS O FIXTURE IN COLUMN REQUIREMENTS Ai (TYP. OF 4) i €1 73 3 / D1A CO DOUITS WNS FOR PIC I FOR CAMERA I 2 1Y ND - 1) 1" CONDUIT FOR CAMERA -J 8" WIDE GA. PRE FINISHED X 20 - RAIN WATER LEADER COVER (TYP. OF 4) Y DAL PVC RAIN WATER - - _0 LEADER (TIP. OF 4) I 1 — 0 — 1 —O C I FIXTURE z V O - z SCALE: 1/4" - I • -O" SPARK UNE OF ACM GRAPHICS PANELS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A Building Side 64' -0" CANOPY FRUING FACE OF CANOPY FRAMING 15' -O Street Side SPARK - SPARK SEAL DECK TO COLLAR Canopy Ceiling and General Notes 1) ALL CEIUNG DECK SHALL BE 20 GA. PREFINISHED TO .MATCH AM /PM WHITE ROLLED PANS WITH 3 -INCH HIGH RIBS AT 16 INCHES O.C. PANELS SHALL BE WATERTIGHT INTERLOCKING SECTIONS CUPPED TO CANOPY FRAME PER STRUCTURAL DWGS. OR PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. 2) ALL EXPOSED METAL SURFACES UNDER CANOPY, INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED TO, CORNICES, RAINWATER LEADER COVERS AND COLUMN TRIM SHALL BE PRE - FINISHED TO MATCH CEIUNG DECK. SEE DETAIL •� -. TS COLUMN 4 O Column Collar Detail SCALE: 1 1/2" -1 -0" 3) CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OPENINGS IN DECK AND INSTALL LIGHT FIXTURES. 4) FASCIA GRAPHICS BACKING AND FLASHING SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CANOPY CONTRACTOR. ACM GRAPHICS, BLUE TRIM, SPARK ETC ARE PROVIDED BY ARCO'S GRAPHICS CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT UNLESS CANOPY AND GRAPHICS CONTRACTOR ARE THE SAME ENTRY. 5) CANOPY CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DRAINAGE AND OVERFLOW FOR CANOPY ROOF INCLUDING, BUT NOT UNITED TO, GUTTERS, RAINWATER LEADERS. OVERFLOWS. DOWNSPOUTS AND SUITABLE CONNECTION STUBS AT COLUMN BASE WHERE C.C. SHALL THEN EXTEND TO THE SITE'S DRAINAGE SYSTEM. SEE CA1 -1 NOTE #1. 6) THE CANOPY SHALL BE ERECTED IN TWO STAGES: STAGE 1: CANOPY CONTRACTOR TO FINISH ANCHOR BOLTS AND TEMPLATES FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S INSTALLATION PRIOR TO POURING FOUNDATIONS. WHEN FOUNDATIONS HAVE SET, CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL COLUMNS AND SECURE THEM TO FOUNDATIONS. COLUMNS SHALL BE STABLE. PLUMB AND TRUE. STAGE 2: AFTER DRNESLAB AND SURROUNDING GRADE IS EITHER PAVED OR STABLE BASE HAS BEEN INSTALLED. CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL COME BACK TO THE SITE TO COMPLETE THE CANOPY. CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT COLUMNS HAVE REMAINED PLUMB PRIOR TO COMMENCING CANOPY ROOF INSTALLATION. 7) ALL CONDUIT INSTALLED BY CANOPY CONTRACTOR SHALL SHALL PULL ROPES AND SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S ELECTRICIAN TO MAKE CONNECTIONS. 8) STUB OUT 1 "0 SURVOLLANCE CAMMERA CONDUITS AT 1B" - BELOW UNDERSIDE OF CANOPY CEILING, AT PIC SIDE OF 8x10 COLUMNS. 2 %3"C20 GA. PREFINISHED COLLAR AT COLUMN I SURVEILLANC CAMERA CONDO 1" UGHTNG CONDUIT I- 3 -1/2" DIA BUMPER POSTS, SEE TS 10 "x10 "x3 /16" W/ 12%12%1/4" PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM ANCHOR BOLTS PER PIC MANUFACTURERS TEMPLATE CONDUITS FOR PIC SEE CA1 -1 Light Detail SCALE 1 1/2" - 1' -0" 23 1/4" SCALE 3/4" - 1' -0" BALL TURN. FIXTURE 1B 1 /B "x6 -5 B "x6" HIGH LOCKING COLLAR FURNISHED W/UGHT 3" HIGH (MAX.) 3" METAL DECK RIBS CEIUNG CANOPY COLUMN 3" DIA. DOWNSPOUT Column /PIC O Plan Enlargement SCALE: 3/4" - 1' -0" UGHT TRIM & LENS FURNISHED W /FIXTURE 14 5/16 "414 5/16 "x6" HIGH SEE BUMPER � \ � 12' -6'+ 4 - 2 " NAM PIC Foundation /Post Detail ACM CLADDING PIC HOME RUNS FOR Pic UNIT AND 1/2" CONDUITS RECEIVED rim 27 20B' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ak■ le ARCO MOT COOT PRODCT% UC NUANCE MAMMON DDONT PM P. Bovis Lend Leine G /oba/Alliance +1}]DD180111 DRIVE u/NY ►CAI= MA11011•L 9EE CPT TAINSATNMT. 1N00 RAMOID No DE90M 9EG,ATD' 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 )425) 251 -6222 A NO DATE IRM9011 DERt®1O4 A A A .x'•EIDTYNN DY ATA1ONNP 140 119 OP WO 1,1001107 100,11770•00 101 0001110 020001 •107007 417,00 070 10 Dor oso ono. egg.. ppg 1■01 110■17 10 an 0007 1000, /00 MAO. 0011:101 NT TO MOO 07113 Of NO 007471 De 10./10 OECEI.DRENT DDCAYATCIt FUEL ISLAND CANOPY DRAWINGS AND DETAILS 911 MODEMS 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. @ 154th St Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #5515 DmOW DE OBO COOED DD 0B0 MARL DD .W WESSON 3/1 /04 OUNCE teat IP 10% AMINCE Mt BC #2369 DDNO10 1TDL• CANOPY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AND DETAILS SHEET NO CA1 -2 .... .4\ 1r ARCO BP INEACOPST PROJCTI, Ill Side Elevation SCALE 1/4' a 1 -0' Front Elevation SCALE I/4' - 1. -0' COLUMNS PLANTED 'PEARL aunt BALLAST FURN. FIXTURE 19 1 /B'x8 -5 6'x6' HIGH LOCKING COLLAR FURNISHED W GHT 3' HIGH (MAX) 3' METAL DECK RIBS IMAGE DECAL 'ARCO BLUE' SIGN BOX BY OTHERS ALUMINUM — FASCIA PANEL R1 -10' ILLUMINATED SPARK LOGO, SEE SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION ILWMINATED SPARK LOGO ON A.C.M. BACKING SEE DETNL AND SITE PLAN FOR 3 LOCATIONS - SPARK FRAMING IMAGE DECAL— ACM FASCIA W/ SHEET METAL BACKING, INTERNAL FRAMING PER MANUFACTURER SHOP DRAWINGS MANUFACTURER 1 AT COORDINATE TACHMENT LOCATIONS W/ INSTALLER 3j14. J , 11 1/Y GUTTER DRAIN W/ STRAINER AND LEADER CANOPY FRAMING MEMBERS, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 3 METAL DECK (TRAVERSE SECTION) 5' 4' ALUMINUM FASCIA WRAP AROUND / SPARK BACK OF RAP TO ALIGN WITH FRONT MID D BACK OF FASCIA CIRCULAR SIGN BOX WRAPPED BY ALUMINUM FASCIA (BOX SITS OUT PAST FASCIA) SPARK FRAMING ATTACHED TO ANGLE IRON BRACKETS PROVIDED BY CANOPY INSTALLER _ .1110101 11404mt IMO 8 w Bovis Lend Lease G /oba /Alliance 4GIIIFIOOMIEANE uwuA nam 89 Mw 89 ppOl/OR 8 8 4. AlY �I 78S?7 Q *E PA STE IGro AL cv� RE5 01 -07-05 a�ao>.arr raeumx FUEL ISLAND CANOPY DRAWINGS AND DETAILS MR .mld 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. @ 154th SL Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #5515 Omt189 R 08 MIY189 0Y! 0 ®R ROO MIN R aLW IOit• EIg611Y 3/1104 SCE #2369 MUM 880 Au1089 MR PROPOSED CANOPY ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS 0895 ICI CA2 -1 Side Elevation SCALE 1/4' a 1 -0' Front Elevation SCALE I/4' - 1. -0' COLUMNS PLANTED 'PEARL aunt BALLAST FURN. FIXTURE 19 1 /B'x8 -5 6'x6' HIGH LOCKING COLLAR FURNISHED W GHT 3' HIGH (MAX) 3' METAL DECK RIBS IMAGE DECAL 'ARCO BLUE' SIGN BOX BY OTHERS ALUMINUM — FASCIA PANEL R1 -10' ILLUMINATED SPARK LOGO, SEE SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION ILWMINATED SPARK LOGO ON A.C.M. BACKING SEE DETNL AND SITE PLAN FOR 3 LOCATIONS - SPARK FRAMING IMAGE DECAL— ACM FASCIA W/ SHEET METAL BACKING, INTERNAL FRAMING PER MANUFACTURER SHOP DRAWINGS MANUFACTURER 1 AT COORDINATE TACHMENT LOCATIONS W/ INSTALLER 3j14. J , 11 1/Y GUTTER DRAIN W/ STRAINER AND LEADER CANOPY FRAMING MEMBERS, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 3 METAL DECK (TRAVERSE SECTION) 5' 4' ALUMINUM FASCIA WRAP AROUND / SPARK BACK OF RAP TO ALIGN WITH FRONT MID D BACK OF FASCIA CIRCULAR SIGN BOX WRAPPED BY ALUMINUM FASCIA (BOX SITS OUT PAST FASCIA) SPARK FRAMING ATTACHED TO ANGLE IRON BRACKETS PROVIDED BY CANOPY INSTALLER _ .1110101 11404mt IMO 8 w Bovis Lend Lease G /oba /Alliance 4GIIIFIOOMIEANE uwuA nam 89 Mw 89 ppOl/OR 8 8 4. AlY �I 78S?7 Q *E PA STE IGro AL cv� RE5 01 -07-05 a�ao>.arr raeumx FUEL ISLAND CANOPY DRAWINGS AND DETAILS MR .mld 15252 Pacific Hwy. So. @ 154th SL Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #5515 Omt189 R 08 MIY189 0Y! 0 ®R ROO MIN R aLW IOit• EIg611Y 3/1104 SCE #2369 MUM 880 Au1089 MR PROPOSED CANOPY ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS 0895 ICI CA2 -1 21' - 24' 21 24" '- CONTAINER= 4' POT .. 12' O.C. LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND BOTANICAL /CDYYDN WWE COMMON SPACING • N N N N • • a • International Boulevard _j its - s, • I W TREES: ACER CIRoNATDY /- ACER PLATANOIOES 'COWINARBROAD' / COIIINIURBROAD MAPLE ACER TRUNCATUN NORWEGIAN SUNSET / - NORWEGIAN SUNSET MAPLE CLNMAECYPARS QUTUs 'OVAGAIS' / _ HINOKI FALSE CYPRESS ICAPIONIA AWIFOUAII _OkIP ACTA" / .. - COMPACT: OREGON GRAPE PRUNUS LAUROCERAAIS. ono wYIS1t / OTW LIIYI(al IAUREL' "` ROSA RUGOSA RUGOSA ROSE (WHITE) _ GROUND COVER?:- ARCTOSTAPHYLOS WA ORB RUBUS PENULDBIIS 'EMERALD cover EXISTING LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AND NOTES ° `, r D.C. 76:: 125 -. RECEIVED -IA4 14 2 "•v] OEVEIOPrEWT GNNNT. REYARIS SURE & GUY ONE GROWING SFASOIk NURSERY GROWN STAID: & GUY 0146 GROWING SEASOP& NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET 1REE USE. STAKE & GUY ONE GROWING. SEASON; NURSERY GROWN .. FOR STREET TREE USE.. STAKE & GUY ONE GROWING SEASOtt NUR VET GROWN '- ASS.. HOLD 16' FROM BOOEIS,� REOb SM61B5 AND 7REE5 - '__: ._ AS HOLD 12' FROM BORDERS • TO 10BAA81, SAVE. AND PROTECT • 1..__ ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS. 10- BE- PROADED AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGA1R)N SYSTEM BY DESGN/UILD -. CONTRACT WITH 1Tff tHINER: 2. STREET- TREES TO BE 20' ON CENTER SPACING. ADJUST INSTALLATION_LDCDONS _TO CLEAR GRNEs. WIGTS. AND UIIUIIES.— MONIUM TREE CLEARANCES: DRIVES 1D'. MRS - - -- f0'- - FIRE HYDRAN75. 15. -AND IRIJTISS'.' - 3. - _CITY REQUIRES - CAPER 1D BE IEAAIRED AT 4 FEET ABOVE ".. = i 11 LSL/_. .1 3 i 3° CT 'IMAM CER11FCCE Na 706 (VAUD bILY AmG SONAILIRE) ARCO _ _ _.__ Um s4Sf ILIST NAmRC15 UL AYUNVE NAVVMP. Aeon fat Fes G /oba/Alliance NAtss1EL 91E AOMT COW93 1 Lao q.n.m AND I 19mrb s• • 18215- 72ND 'AVENUE SOVIH'. = _ _- -KE T WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -6 222 .. 0 A SEAL, 1EMm1 06Z1ernaM n AMM11urt, TIA171.1011. arm OloWIRE JO IA .Nr CP SP 6E\saan.r C aEOWAlssc 91E Ano ESS 15252 International Blvd 154th Street Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #-5515 OF99E9 R ma li ®R NAM R Ma Galt RIO! s WAN ewe. we NOEL! @ BCE #2369 LaN+b. CAPE PLANTING PLAN L1 -1 ATTACHM ENT C !ANEYStRAPE PLANTING NOTES AND MATERIALS FURNISH ALL MATERIALS. TABOR, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED TEEMS NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE TREATMENT AND PREPARATION OF SOIL, FINISH GRADING. PLACEIAEPR OF SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIALS, FERTILIZER. STAKING, MULCH, CLEW -UP, DEBRIS REMOVAL. AND 90-DAY MWNIE ONCE, QUALIFICATIONS: LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO BE SKILLED AND KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THE FIELD OF WORK. CONTRACTOR 1D BE LICENSED TO PERFORM THE WORK SPECIFIED WITHIN THE PRESIDING JURISDICTION. JOB CONDITIONS: IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILm TO REVIEW THE SITE AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVES. AU. PLANT MATERIAL AND FINISH GRADES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER. PROTECTION: SAVE AND PROTECT AU. EXISTING PLANTINGS SHOWN TO REMAIN. DO NOT PLANT UNTIL OTHER CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WHICH CONFLICT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE INSTALLED. DO NOT PLANT UNTIL THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN TESTED AND APPROVED. HANDLE PLANTS WITH CARE - DO NOT DAMAGE OR BREAK ROOT SYSTEM. BARK. OR BRANCHES. REPAIR AND /OR REPLACE ITEMS DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF WORK. OR WORK NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS DIRECTED BY OWNER AT NO ADOMONAL COST. REPAIR OF EXISTING PLANTINGS: DURING THE COURSE OF WORK, REPAIR ALL EXISTING PUNTING AREAS BY PRUNING DEAD GROWTH, RE- ESTABLISHING FINISHED GRADE AND RE- MULCHING TO SPECIFIED DEPTH. GUARANTEE: GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB BY OWNER 90-DAY MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OWNER WITH A SCOPE OF WORK AT TIME OF INITIAL PROJECT BID TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE FOR 90 DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF PROJECT DESCRIBED BED IN AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE. MAINTENANCE AS LATERALS: PLANT LATERALS: PUNT MATERIALS TO BE GRADE NO. 1. SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH (RAN) AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI 280.1- 1998). PRUNE PUNTS RECEIVED FROM THE NURSERY ONLY UPON AUTHORIZATION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 'B A B' INDICATES BALED AND BURLAPPED; CONT.' INDICATES CONTAINER 'BR' INDICATES BARE ROOT; 'CAL' INDICATES CALLIPER AT r ABOVE SOIL UNE: 'GAL' INDICATES GALLON. A) SPECIFIED PLANT CANOPY SIZE OR CALIPER B THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE CONTAINER B) OR SIZE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM PLANT CONDION ID BE PROVIDED. PUNT MATERIAL TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS FOR DISEASE INSPECTION. PLANTS TO BE FULLY LIVE. VIGOROUS. WELL FORMED. WITH WELL DEVELOPED FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEMS ROOT BAILS OF PUNTS TO BE SOLID AND FIRMLY HEED TOGETHER, SECURELY CONTAINED AND PROTECTED FROM INJURY AND DESICCATION. PLANTS DETERMINED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO HAVE BEEN DAMAGED; LAVE DEFORMITIES OF STEM. BRANCHES., OR ROOTS; LACK SYMMETRY, HAVE MULTIPLE LEADERS OR Y CROTCHES LESS IRAN 30 DEGREES IN TREES, OR DO NOT MEET SIZE OR ANSI STANDARDS WILL BE REJECTED. PLANT MATERIAL TO BE FROM A SINGLE NURSERY SOURCE FOR EACH SPECIFIED SPECIES/HYBRID. NURSERY SOURCES TO BE THOSE LOCATED IN THE SAME REGION AS THE JOB SITE C) SUBSTITUTION: NO SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT MATERIAL SPECIES OR VARIETY, WILL BE PERMITTED UNLESS WRITTEN EVIDENCE IS SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FROM TWO QUALIFIED PLANT BROKERAGE OFFICES. SUBSRRRIONS WHICH ARE PERMITTED TO BE IN WRITING FROM THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE SPECIFIED SIZE, SPECIES AND NEAREST VARIETY, AS APPROVED. TO BE FURNISHED. SOIL PREPARATION: MAY BE SPECIFIC TO THE STE. OR TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE SITE AS NOTED ON THE PUN. THE FOLLOWING: TOPSOIL ANOADMET. AND BACOTLL ARE GENERAL REQUIROADTS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PUNS. SOIL FFRTOJIY AND NTRIWLTIHIL SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: • AFTER ROUGH GRADING AND PRIOR TO SOIL PREPARATION. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN AGRONOMIC SOILS TESTS FOR PLANTING AREAS, LAWN AND SHRUB LANDSCAPE. A MINIMUM OF ONE SAMPLE AND ONE PER EACH IWO ACRES OF LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE OBTAINED. IF ON -SITE TOPSOIL HAS BEEN STOCKPILED, A TEST TO BE COMPLETED FOR R. ALSO. TESTS TO INCLUDE FERTILITY AND SUTABIUTY ANALYSIS WIN WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL AMENDMENT, FERTILIZER, COND(TDMERS, APPLICATION RATES, AND POST - CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. TESTS TO BE PERFORMED BY AN APPROVED SOIL TESTING LABORATORY WHICH WILL BE CONTRACTED WITH AND PAD FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SODS REPORT AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE MINIMUMS NOTED, BELOW. PROVIDE CHANGE ORDER FOR ADOMONAL MATERIALS REQUIRED IN THE SOILS REPORT. A) TOPSOIL AS A MINIMUM SUPPLY TOPSOIL CONSISIIN° OF LOAM SOIL WITH 5 TO 7 PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER. TOPSOIL TO BE AMENDED WITH SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS IN C)1. AND C 2., BELOW, AND BE BLENDED TO SPECIFIED' DEPTH IN E), BELOW. LOAM TO TO FIELD METHOD OF DETERMINING SOIL TEXTURE CLASSES FOR LOAM AND SILT LOAM, US. SQL CONSERVATION SERVICE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE TOPSOIL SUPPLIER AND SAMPLE OF TOPSOIL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY NECESSARY WEED CONTROL RESULTING FROM CONTAMINATED OFF -SITE SOURCES. B) NATIVE SURFACE SOIL INCLUDING STOCKPILED TOPSOIL SURFACE SOIL ON -SITE MAY MEET TEXTURAL CLASSIFICATION AS NOTED IN A). ABOVE PROVIDE � D IN C) 1. AND C) 2., BELOW, AND EVENLY BLEND AMENDMENTS TO C) AMENDMENT 1. ORGANIC COMPOST TOPSOIL FOR PLANTING TO CONTAIN 15 TO 20 PERCENT ORGANIC MATERIAL BY VOLUME THE FOLLOWING B FOR SOIL WITH 3-4 X ORGANIC CONTENT. PROVIDE THREE INCHES (TWO INCHES COMPACTED DEPTH) OF COMPOST PER 12 INCHES OF SPECIFIED TOPSOIL DEPTH. MUSHROOM COMPOST. SLUDGE/ COMPOST BLEND, AND /OR AGED FIR BARK MULCH WILL SATISFY ORGANIC REQUIREMENTS COMPOST TO BE FROM NON -FARM ANIMAL SOURCES, NOR FROM 2 SOU RCES CONTAINING REDWOOD /CEDAR PRODUCTS. COMPLETE FERTILIZER WITH TRACE ELEMENTS. 8 PERCENT SULFUR AND A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN. FERLLLIZ R TO BE 'AGRO- DELUXE NURSERY' 10 -15 -20 AT 50 POUNDS PER 10 YARDS OF ORGANIC COMPOST. OR COMPARABLE NITROGEN EQUIVALENT. D) PLANTING BACKFILL ON -SITE TOPSOIL (EXCAVATED PIT SPOILS) AS FIELD PREPARED FOR PLANTING/LAWN. E) TOPSOIL PREPARATION AS A MINIMUM. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO HAVE 12 INCHES MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL PER A) AND /OR B), ABOVE. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST GRADES AND SUPPLY TOPSOIL AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE THE MINIMUM DEPTH. CONTRACTOR TO FORM BERMS TO THE HEIGHT AND EXTENT NOTED HERE AND SHOWN ON THE PUNS. AMENDMENTS TO BE EVENLY BLENDED THROUGHOUT THE TOP 8- INCHES. TOPSOIL TO BE WORKED INTO SUB- BASF / SUBSOL FOR ROUGH TRANSITION. SOIL DEPTH SPECIFIED IS FINISHED. COMPACTED DEPTH. PARKING PLANER ISLANDS TO BE OVER EXCAVATED BY BACKHOE REMOVE PAVING WASTE. GRAVEL BASE AND UNDERLING SUBSOIL TO 18• BELOW TOP OF PAVING. SCARIFY AND OVER EXCAVATE PIT BOTTOM 12' TO MINIMIZE STRUCTURAL COMPACTION. BARK MULCH (TOPDRESSNG): ONE - HALF -INCH (1/2') SITE TO ONE -INCH (11, I.E. 'MEDIUM.' HEMLOCK/FR BARK. FINE MULCH, LE., 'STFFRCO' TEXTURE AND CEDAR ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. STAKES 2 -INCH DIAMETER ER 8 -FOOT MINIMUM LDOGEPOLE PINE STAKES GUY MATERIAL 1 -INCH WIDE POLYETHYLENE CHAIN LOCK TYPE TIES; OR, 3/8' DIAMETER RUBBER. NO WIRE. LAWN: COMMERCIAL SOD TO MATCH EXISTING. HERBICIDE HERBICIDE IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE FIRST YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION. ANTI- DESICCANT: "WILT - PROOF,' 48 HOURS PRIOR TO SHIPMENT TO SITE FROM JUNE 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER. THOROUGHLY ROOT WATER PLANTS PRIOR TO DEI,NERY. PLAT MATERIAL DEINERED TO SITE TO BE KEPT CONTINUALLY MOIST THROUGH INSTALLATION. EXECUTION: FINISH GRADES: FINE GRADE AND REMOVE ROCKS AND FOREIGN OBJECTS OVER TWO INCHES (2') DIAMETER FROM TOP THREE INCHES (31 OF PREPARED PUNTING BED. ALL FINISHED GRADES TO BE SMOOTH EVEN GRADES, LIGHTLY COMPACTED. AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND DETAILED. SITE CIVIL DRAWINGS IDENTIFY FINAL ELEVATIONS. TREES ARRANGE TREES ON SITE 94 PROPOSED LOCATIONS PER DRAWINGS. EXCAVATE PR, PLANT AND STAKE OR GUY. AS CALLED OUT AND DETAILED. ALL TREES AND SUPPORTS TO STAND VERTICAL TREES TO BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON THE PUNTING PUN. LOCATED AS DETAILED AND AS CALLED OUT ON PLANT LIST. BACKELL SHALL BE PIT SPOILS. SETTLE BADKFTLL USING WATER ONLY. NO MECHANICAL COMPACTION. SHRUBS INSTALL SHRUBS AS SPECIFIED FOR TREES. GROUNDCOVEt EXCAVATE PETS TO A MINIMUM OF THREE INCHES (3') BELOW, AND TWICE THE ROOT BA. DIAMETER WATER THOROUGHLY AND TAKE CARE TO ENSURE THAT ROOT CROWN IS AT PROPER GRADE. AS DETAILED. MULCH: MULCH ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS NOT COVERED BY LAWN. APPLY SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO PROVIDE THREE INCHES (3') TO FOUR INCHES (41 DEPTH. UTILITY CLEARANCES: FIELD ADJUST PUNT LOCATIONS FOR B-FOOT SEPARATION OF TREES /SHRUBS AND 2 -FOOT SEPARATION FOR GROUNDCOVER FROM FIRE HYDRANTS AND UTILITY VAULTS PLANTING LINNTENANCE: CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PLANTINGS THROUGH COMPLETED INSTALLATION, AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. PUNTING MAINTENANCE TO INCLUDE WATERING, WEEDING, CULTIVATING. TIGHTENING AND REPAIRING OF TREE GUYS, RESETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADES OR POSITION, RE- ESTABLISHING SETTLED GRADES; AND MOWING LAWNS WEEKLY AFTER LAWN ESTABLISHMENT. HERBICIDE IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. INCLUDED S REPLACEMEAT OF DEAD PUNTS AND PLANTS SHOWING LOSS OF 40 PERCENT OR MORE OF CANOPY. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE MAINTAINED INCLUDING ADJUSTMENTS FOR BALANCED WATER DISTRIBUTION & PRECIPITATION. FAILED OR MALFUNCTIONING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE REPLACED DR CORRECTED. PLANT AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE TO INCLUDE THOSE OPERATIONS NECESSARY TO THE PROPER GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TiDS WORK IN ADOmON TO SPECIFIC WARRANTY/GUARANTEES. NOT TO SCALE 2 MULCH LAYER (COMPACTED DEPTH) MULCH AT CURB DETAIL (2) _ E OF � 5� EXI AT RUBBER T8: O1 FIGU E DEW PATTERN. STAKES AND TREE RU/I03 r DEEP SAUCER FOR WATER r DEEP MLACN LAYER (COMPACTED DEPTH) REMOVE ALL TES WRAP & CONTAINERS. FREE TAOSIIEIER ROOTS FROM NURSERY SAL EXCAVATE TREE PIT AT A MD. OF • TIMES DA OF ROOTBATL AT BALL CENTER. TAPERING PIT GRADE TO FINISH GRADE PIT SPOILS, NURSERY BALL WASTE BACIOIL SET BALL ON WmSRJRBED SUJBCRADE. OR COMPACTED SOIL NOTE LIGHT FEITTIUZER OVER PLANTING BED DEL ONLY; NO FERTILIZER N PLANTING PIT. WORK PERIMETER ROOTS FREE OF NURSERY BALL PR TO BE COURSELY SCARIFIED. EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING /STAKING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PRUNE DAMAGED 1MG5 AFTER PLANTING PLACE IN VERT. P03ID1E DOUBLE LEADERS WLL BE REJECTED NOTE KEEP ROOIBNl MOIST AND PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES. HOLD CROWN OF FOOTBALL AT OR JUST ABOVE HASHED GRADE. PROTECT TRUNK AND LIMBS FROM PMNRY. BACKFILL TO SE SETTLED USING WATER ONLY - REMOVE ALL WRAP. TIES B CONTAINERS. REGARDLESS OF WTE8A. 2) LOOGEPOLE (p4.0.G SEASON TIED W FIGURE EIGHT; REMOVE AFTER PROTECTIVE WRAPPING DURING SHIPMENT TO SITE A INSTALLATION REMOVE AT COMPLETION OF PLANTING NOD BACK FROM TRUNK 8 TO 10 INCHES; FINISH GRADE PREPARE PLANTING BED PER SPECS: AT MeL, LOOSEN AND MB SOIL TO 18 OR DEPTH OF ROOTBLL AND 4 TIMES BAIL OA Ro ME ACORN FtbrEt AWAY FROM PERIMETER ROOTS SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED BASE OR COMPACTED MOUND UNDER BALL PENETRATION TO SUBBASE (4) 24' DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING /STAKING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 2' MULCH LAYER (COMPACTED DEPTH) FEATHER EXCESS SOIL UNDER 1' MULCH AT CROFN 1/2' ABOVE GRADE 1' ABOVE GRADE NOTE: F RS CONTAINER A WORK ROOTS 8MJOTLL TO BE SETTLED ICING WATER ONLY. MOW PLANTS FROM EDGE OF PLANTER AS NOTED ON PLANT UST BED LINE EDGE CURB/RAL( IISY T HAN 1 GAL t PUNTED A FTER MULH ) GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL W T , CrorrurmR and IA118n RANTED BEFORE MULCH ) ® . P itritirot PLANT MATERIAL SPACING DETAIL q.\ SPACING AS CALLED OUT ON PUN /PUNT LIST HOLD PLANTS FROM AS NOTED ON PLANT UST NOTE: THIS SPACING APPLIES TO GROUNDCOVER AND FORMAL SHRUB ROW PLACEMENT. RECEIVED MAR 14 2005 DEVELOPMENT STATE OF WASHING • REG �-La ;:a• LAND - j� CERTIFICATE NO. 700 (VAID ONLY 111111 SIGNATURE) ARCO PIMP CDMT1MODIC1A LNG NLI a NANAMDL AGM Foe O Bovis Lena Lease G /oba/Alliance fDtfWOINIE LAPMNA COMM NA ENN. DE ADAPT DORADERY Lao Rmeo .,o DmDN vtaAUSn 1 8215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251 -8222 Nn A ME >IIAIDBT@ Iv soma or ■esa medZIMS 4001.3..1. COT., V. MAZONALS 0.9 PIM a. RONDO AMP KT■ef 6141i.l11 de raCIPIDIT WWI 70 DELKIDA[YY IfOWAMMG 011E A ORIUM 15252 International Blvd @ 154th Street Tukwila, Washington 98188 FAC #-5515 GEMMED R ANTS D ®R Al MUM IM AIS MOM N VICE FAD* I WY MJ_ C E #2369 DwNIn „LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS gay NM L1 -2 ERAL NOTES: 20 10 r7 • '6'' SI DEWLL1 Cry .:e.L SOUTHCENTCR BLVD 0 'i ^, 1I I 20 s I ■ r r i i I 1 1 I i I � ! j PC CURB SCALE t.1 FEET I OR NORTHEAST AND NORTH PLAZA PAVING AND FURNISHING PLAN, SEE ARCHITECTURAL DETA SHEETS. PT CURB R40 SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR LOCATION, MATERIAL AND LIMITS OF LANDSCAPE AREAS. II S I C \ /750 4 +96.39, 37� /•' I i t / r l r I � STRUCTION NOTES: ' ` / // _ o ( CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN F -3. % / ti / f / d A 1 i r / , ru LIMIT OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION OR RECONSTRUCTION. � / / � LANDSCAPE STRIP. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND TYPICAL SECTIONS. / / / g / o° g MATCH EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AND GRADE. / / I / � N CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE WSDOT STD PLAN F— I. A / / 1 / b l r i if BARRIER FENCE. / / / / 4 i t / / / I . r l r //1 // RAMP, SEE WSDOT DETAIL F -3o_ / I i ! • CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER. SEE KING CO SW PLANS 3 -001 Sr 3 -002 SEE DWG R502CP01 EXTRUDED ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB, SEE KING CO STD PLAN 3 -002. CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER. SEE CITY OF TUKWILA STD PLAN RS —II. CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. SEE CITY OF TUKWILA STD PLAN RS -9. Designed By. R. MEYER Drown By. A. BREWER Checked By. P. PROCHASKA Approved By R [;HT Y Hatch Mott Cat mo ?- MacDonald , ° m Submitted: SEE DWG R502CP02 • A / / / N jp, L / I 8 it I � � rr rt / tr l ' / A fi r \ A \ Y r \ \ i r \ r PA.RiCtNC r. ?r r r r ;� / ,r r ` ° a ' PC CURB I ; 26+ 6624 102 o ,.., wawNpt... 0e0O4 (422) .60 -7022 Dote: Approved: NIC SOUNDTRANSIT Dote: R4(AcZo3 ASP' Scale: Date: I"=20' Filename: S59 _R 402CP02.DWG Contract No.: C 759 10/06/04 PAVED PART .VG PT URB R4CI 20 +8&2 46.QO LT _ ! --- - - - - - - B" CEDAR —•+.,� 7� —�. 9LOCK WALL CA re Ar� _,,,I i , O r BEGI TAPER I j , W o f - - -- 40 + 9. 0, 6.00 - ; 35' LINK LIGHT RAIL PROJECT SOUTH CORRIDOR SOUTHCENTER BLVD ROAD MODIFICATIONS PLAN R40 STA 17 +50 TO R40 STA 22 +50 Drawing No.: R402CP 02 Sheet No.: Rev.: as • GENERAL NOTES: I. FOR NORTHEAST PLAZA AND NORTH SURFACE PARKING • LOT ENTRY PLANS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL SHEETS. . I f I INTERSECTION PR3 1 +00= R40 24 +96 25+00 '•• , Z93 35.5V KI AVM ROW AND SOUT CFNTF .BL -VO.4 Designed By. R. MEYER Drown By. Checked By. P. PROCHASKA Approved By. B. KNIGHT KING COUNTY. R TC G 0 50055_1959)•__ - -- _____ RN LINE, NOW - -- 2 i r°.yF I' 3AR3ED WIR A. BREWER ;r zpe,g3 PC CURB R40 24 +75.26. 60.01 LT PC END TAPER R40 24+49.63, 38.28 SIDEW LK, R40 24 ;3 53.30 LT 1SEE\CEMENT CONCRETE CROSSWAEKDDET�[bZ ;DWG R402CDO I rAM Ha tch Mott MacDonald Submitted: Date: •JTFALL ( ,NTAX'E IE 3D7.ig CONSTRUCTION NOTES: O LANDSCAPE STRIP, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND TYPICAL SECTIONS. Qi BARRIER FENCE. © CURB RAMP. SEE WSDOT DETAIL F -3a. 13 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER. SEE CITY OF TUKW I LA STD PLAN RS-1 I. CrtS J Enifineeirs. box SEE DWG P76 -AU < I z U W 1411 -112th Av we N.C. Su It. 102 Bel ve. weo,Ygten owe. (425) 55 -7022 'Approved: 'Date: SOUNDTRANSIT Scale: Date: Filename: S59_t402CP03.dwg Contract No.: C 759 98, ,46.50' LT PAS R402cX03 ca 20.00 RT I " =20' 10/06/04 SCALE IN FEET NI C 20 10 0 20 40 InIIS1f� LINK LIGHT RAIL PROJECT SOUTH CORRIDOR SOUTHCENTER BLVD ROAD MODIFICATIONS PLAN R40 STA 22 +50 TO R40 STA 26 +00 Drawing No.: R402CP03 Sheet No.: 2.6 Rev.: L TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. 1J , n� .2. 002 ° • ��� UP o ate I - 4Y/ 7 NJV /e. @ D QLe L 1' WIDE CHAINLOCK TREE TIE PLASTIC LOCKING ROPE USE 4 PER TREE 10' -0' BVC TREATED STAKES DRIVEN TO REFUSAL INTO UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL MIN. 24" DEPTH USE TWO PER TREE. SECURE TIE TO STAKE W/ ROOFING NAIL ROOTBALL 2" BARK MULCH PEEL BACK AND REMOVE TOP THIRD OF BURLAP AND BASKET PUBLIC WORKS 12" GREATER THAN ROOTBALL 0 TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE N.T.S. — ENGINEERING — STREETS — WATER— SEWER — PARKS— BUILDING DERBY'S TAVERN REMOVE (4) 2' x 4' x 3' THICK PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS FOR TREE INSTALLATION. AFTER TREE PLANTING, CONCRETE PANELS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON RECOMPACTED SOIL FLUSH VM114 SIDEWALK GRADE. PROVIDE, INSTALL, FLUSH, AND PROVIDE FUNCTION OF 10' LENGTH DOUBLE LOOP OF NETAFIM CV DRIPPER TUBING EMITTING 9 GPH PER TREE CONNECT TO EXISTING 3/4" PVC 90" ELL. FURNISH AND INSTALL VATH FITTINGS. DEPT. \— COSTING 3/4" PVC IRRIGATION PIPE designed SV drawn checked 5dd bk no by JA SV prof end SV droj do dote 10/04 10/04 10/04 10/04 T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. i t cone IIM zP OSP TREE PLANING G SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME TREES WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAMOSCAPii ASCIITTICTUNZ I1CLIA'1700U[, P AIDmC AND DEMON MU .SST AVENUI: Bi7rc4 NUMB= ice 5wATTL4 OAicmuTON 0110¢ T' TILOS-44114M PAZ704446-OW ? COMMON NAME CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS INCENSE CEDAR 5' -8' HT., B&B SELECT ACER PLATANOIDES var. COWMNARBROAD/ PARKWAY 2" CAL MIN., B&B SELECT 'COIIJMNARBROAD/ PARKWAY (CLUSTER GROUPS Of THREE or ' ALD,'QUEEN' (3) TO FIVE ( "IF FIFTY (50) ACER PLATANOIDES var. 'COWMNARBROAD/ PARKWAY ARE PROVEN UNAVAILABLE, THE CCNTRACTOR MAY PROPOSE TO SUBSTITUTE UP TO 25 ACER PLATANOIDES var. 'EMERALD QUEEN' NORWAY MAPLES FOR UP TO 25 OF THE ACER PLATANOIDES var. 'COWMNARBROAD/ PARKWAY ACER TRUNCATUM x A. PLATANOIDES -OTC NOR STATE OF WAS.NGTON LAtDsoAPC CM ti CE ROE CERTFlED No. IRS U no dote revisions n SIZE /CONDITIONS 59+00 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 O PLANT STREET TREE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 7 2 -1/2" CAL. MIN., B&B SELECT AS SHOWN 96 GENERAL NOTFS 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING TREE INSTALLATION 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE SPACING QTY. AS SHOWN 28 AS SHOWN 50 SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD KING COUNTY JULY, 2004 STREET TREES - PLAN F U foe no: 240.3P01 node: 1' - 20� date: 10 -04 -044 _ 2° DEPTH BARK MULCH ■0 13 +00 —LAM SOD TO MATCH -- EXISTING - - -- ANT SCHEDULE T18OL BOTANICAL NAME ES S 0 QUERCUS COCCINEA THUA OCCIDENTAL'S 'EMERALD SMARAGD' ERICA CARJEA 'SPRINGWOOD' 'SPRINGWOOD PINK' YI VELLII' CALLUNA VULGAR'S TA BERSERKS T}A.NBER II 'CRIMSON PYGMY' • PRUNUS U.AUROCER SUS MT. VERNON BERSERKS TWUNBERGII 'ROSE GLOW JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO' _PUBLIC COMMON NAME SCARLET OAK EMERALD GREEN AMERICAN ARBORVITAE I-EATI -I FEATHER DWARF JAPANESE BARBERRY MT. VERNON LAUREL ROSE GLOW JAPANESE BARBERRY BUFFALO JUNIPER SIZE/C.ONDMCNS 5 GAL CONT. I GAL CONT. I GAL CONT. 9" SP. MIN. 9° SP. MN. 15 " -18' VT. MIN. 12° SP. MIN. WORKS DEPT. — ENGINEERING— STREETS — WATER— SEWER— PARKS — BUILDING SPACING QTY. 2-11-2" CAL MILL, 848 SELECT AS SHOUN 48 3b° 0.C. 3 24` OZ. 301 24° 0.0. 114 24 °0C. 558 24" OZ. 632 3b`OC. 159 36 °OTC. 449 SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME SHRUBS CON'T. Ali Ala 112 Lt2 Lk WV" AZALEA VINO CRIMSON' EUONYMUS ALATA 'COMPACTA' CIS/US X I415RIDUS PIAUS MUGO GROUNDCOVER ;iiiliiilci RUBUS CALYCNOIDES 'CsREEN CARPET' VIBURNUM DAVID!' HEDERA HELIX CEONOTHUS GLORIOSUS LAUN SOD (4563 SF.) BARK MULCH ONLY (290 SF) PRUNUS LAUROCER SUS 'OTTO LUYKEN' RHODODENDRON 'PJM' NCN RHODODENDRON 'DORA AMATEIS' NCN COMMON NAME GREEN CARPET OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL I-INO CRIMSON AZALEA COMPACT BURNING BUSY UNITE ROCKROSE MUGO FINE 15' SP. MIN. 15" SP. MIN. IS' SP. MIN. 9' 8P. MN. SIZE/CONDITIONS SPACING QTY. 18' -21" HT. MN. 12° SP. CONT. 18 ° -21° 14T. MN. 9 °SP. (3) RUNNERS 18' OZ. 280 DAVID VIBURNUM 9° SP. MN. 18° 0,C. ENGLISH WY 12 °SP. (3) RUNNERS 24 °. OZ. MIN. CONT. POINT REYES CEONOTHUS I GAL. CONT. IS° O.G. REFER TO SHEET L12 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES 3' O.C. 331 3' OZ. 8 3' 0.0. 10 3' OZ. 'T5 3' O.C. 61 3' O.C. 241 3' OTC. T1 1951 261 501 SCALE: 1" e 2 0' -0" ran 0' 10' 20' 40' U 0 date Federal Aid # P— STPUL— TA96(097) Project # 91 —RW03 SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 111E .. m dcwgned1AL Tnl/D drown 8" 7/31/02 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. venp checked 7p1/ 2 WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RECREATIONAL PLANNING AND DESIGN 1632 FIRST AVENUE SUITE NUMBER 606 1 u1g KING COUNTY JULY, 2002 no proj dir I Anlf PI AN scow . . _ 2° DEPTH BARK MULCH ■0 13 +00 —LAM SOD TO MATCH -- EXISTING - - -- ANT SCHEDULE T18OL BOTANICAL NAME ES S 0 QUERCUS COCCINEA THUA OCCIDENTAL'S 'EMERALD SMARAGD' ERICA CARJEA 'SPRINGWOOD' 'SPRINGWOOD PINK' YI VELLII' CALLUNA VULGAR'S TA BERSERKS T}A.NBER II 'CRIMSON PYGMY' • PRUNUS U.AUROCER SUS MT. VERNON BERSERKS TWUNBERGII 'ROSE GLOW JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO' _PUBLIC COMMON NAME SCARLET OAK EMERALD GREEN AMERICAN ARBORVITAE I-EATI -I FEATHER DWARF JAPANESE BARBERRY MT. VERNON LAUREL ROSE GLOW JAPANESE BARBERRY BUFFALO JUNIPER SIZE/C.ONDMCNS 5 GAL CONT. I GAL CONT. I GAL CONT. 9" SP. MIN. 9° SP. MN. 15 " -18' VT. MIN. 12° SP. MIN. WORKS DEPT. — ENGINEERING— STREETS — WATER— SEWER— PARKS — BUILDING SPACING QTY. 2-11-2" CAL MILL, 848 SELECT AS SHOUN 48 3b° 0.C. 3 24` OZ. 301 24° 0.0. 114 24 °0C. 558 24" OZ. 632 3b`OC. 159 36 °OTC. 449 SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME SHRUBS CON'T. Ali Ala 112 Lt2 Lk WV" AZALEA VINO CRIMSON' EUONYMUS ALATA 'COMPACTA' CIS/US X I415RIDUS PIAUS MUGO GROUNDCOVER ;iiiliiilci RUBUS CALYCNOIDES 'CsREEN CARPET' VIBURNUM DAVID!' HEDERA HELIX CEONOTHUS GLORIOSUS LAUN SOD (4563 SF.) BARK MULCH ONLY (290 SF) PRUNUS LAUROCER SUS 'OTTO LUYKEN' RHODODENDRON 'PJM' NCN RHODODENDRON 'DORA AMATEIS' NCN COMMON NAME GREEN CARPET OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL I-INO CRIMSON AZALEA COMPACT BURNING BUSY UNITE ROCKROSE MUGO FINE 15' SP. MIN. 15" SP. MIN. IS' SP. MIN. 9' 8P. MN. SIZE/CONDITIONS SPACING QTY. 18' -21" HT. MN. 12° SP. CONT. 18 ° -21° 14T. MN. 9 °SP. (3) RUNNERS 18' OZ. 280 DAVID VIBURNUM 9° SP. MN. 18° 0,C. ENGLISH WY 12 °SP. (3) RUNNERS 24 °. OZ. MIN. CONT. POINT REYES CEONOTHUS I GAL. CONT. IS° O.G. REFER TO SHEET L12 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES 3' O.C. 331 3' OZ. 8 3' 0.0. 10 3' OZ. 'T5 3' O.C. 61 3' O.C. 241 3' OTC. T1 1951 261 501 SCALE: 1" e 2 0' -0" ran 0' 10' 20' 40' U 0 • 0 IMI Embedment Detail M �M MI Ell � =MI MI -- O Suction 1— YDlcol NM MI MIMI MI MN O Reor Elevolion 0 Side ElevoROn O O F ront Elevation • Y n. STOP uR co SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN M 1/010'M' • �, , ,�... T1.I„o MO YON SIONS,A ' MOT 0. =AP Ina I \ KIS NOO O, MO D. OM Pacific Highway South (SR 1) MOM MAIM I MAUI U/ IMAM Ii0 1001101 IPX0 U I01d KKR MX LEMIQ DENO COAX SPOT MOM WIns DIM( came / �- rMarPm MI . Par r IWI. IMPOSED OM 000001 - Ara Ial WM•AT MINI MD NMGOS MOOR MUM, TOLL LOI SINN It Iot IO COP UM 0 O HOWL RmIMO OPItMI M M . Ma OM Pt MO OVOU AT »P00 LOCUM a) COWS PPM AS/ Wrfml. Pa rum WE re 0OMOSS AT PROM L.115M • COP 115510 MOM m 000.1110•10001C a�m. OD/CL « am«c I. C il W Tai • ACOMO10C MM CM P MVP MOWS L L@I«O P&0Ca MSS =MU MOM TM.L R OA/0® WI MOOS SO «n• IO IPAOli IT COO Sofa LOOM IOU mm L MOPS All ID TC• P MOM MUDS 011400 IM . Site Address: 15252 International Blvd. Parcel #: 004300 -0070 RECEIVED IAN 2 7 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L33.4 N1. 3WOS O!► 03 .0 01 . 03 zC i re::it,� rnw i`' ',j��''^ 213* >y7y�'l rY E£'�t^,I a• • • .4,,,o;.0- } y 'i4b� S y� � 4 , , fi' a y {xo b UC ,- 4, Yl . ' .y '1. lYH � \ J.:_�t ..L ..31ie FT I 51 3` ;eyg i!;Y ' , fi , 9s. •si a" +^S" �..d` .•.r vW t o S> • .d .c+ ?geR.F. d'�il �r :h. -.O ki 'a . . ;..,F 1^ ,p. l 43:: : .nu .SRS O.. ¶ r, hY 4%, :i..er'f -r • .coxW 9A.F -1' '-r'ta'•51¢ '•" .'''''':. e, --,'I. •. '.t 0 .' - ) 43/o5 11 � - •a 9 } I'•.y'Ryv- A�C!'�,pp�y '.�'" i.iln.. i_,�Y.'. (•i�w.`K —LSE'. ,.• v �:e-. • ?? 11 y ^a'•.i: -awi'r- `• + . ,s.1!i .'1'4, .fpkis cE; ..., • fy, f� /. rt 4r, t,- tril,J:h `o0.a ..tu .,y ?! r tip' ^et o--M' L �Gyy"' ^¢ ' Ffh'x' t4'. . S . a ..zy _ ... f ,F 'F,.rs _ D • en ,, 7 , �t)E. ( m tea.¢ , a tr • ki,• j`a8.¢riF5, - 14 u.f w w, ''� � ' �cf i ?cT : • •'xz. r ~er r" mosd3•` - 1 \ ri t� -,*+• r� q rS: 4'0. i 'u"+✓: a '. °a `S ' `+' rg 1a; �. - �'!te > [ i�yJ ..... .- ev samxzc •m, : ' '+1 : ;HOURS 4 {C S N ? aas -fix n�. y�'�'�6 h• i �7`� 'a e5'a a•..a.a9.. ^ti oys n-�4�� fN: 9vr .. Ja V l.4'. '. -`.,, Y`. 'm, '...,11:,..-.6,,z.“--, ,4 o,>_w 4'110 w ox � u ;.,'•, ..'.a, 4V.Mr_.r, �i.. ray, 2c` ` , rt :, - ' fl rx Ca tea .are• ®, d•t; a+ r, , r° . 4 7 " A; f a � p.: •.c • s rr p t , c ' a u d ' . . ;Mil ;IT o e t,^1 , G bs- 's ue ,'S6'•r_.. ' 7 . +c a - r y - .. ke - x{ , t 'R.-A {t ., •PK on L Y f?"43 h `� 1 ' - :0-7, , ,:i.( .t,t�ae+ ur . 44 4 .Si *-. lsu.a ... Sta„l • n .nn.4{ .At,, tivy s " d at_i va v *, ,rtfg a. nlv' ' *' ,, e t ? ^s€ T x Mrs ¢ s•-r-. �.h m ` ` t + .q• [[ tot tF,. -Y ;i nr r �tiew K ,, ,ra- ri a A'7?y's x+W3•r mrxq""m •br •ia*aha F t +s F� ?` m• +R - :, •,.J ° .+�.. i. an •5- m:.y. dray •+lin v'ckr•*�i� .t '•,. ic a „e, - y..pobe C '�'�' a.9 i`S... r r'•> r ".-/•"•••,;',...".." j ` q Y o' r -ytg.. , .tc. r: t.4. . � {12rt 7 •v. .�, � y . ar o r r .R,.r. g nu i r •-,,,.-5...,..7:;,..) _ ., m5,. *•c '. -SS a., x 4 . y o ' x,--,. ° a 40114 - v - - m v . r6 rv, -x 5--- 5. va :,T., F .fi —.t... `' '-'1, . m J`. 5-5 S : v 1 ei qr. a¢ <,. .'d? d ev 9. d � g yy �. w -t- 40, a ' .a•isG " o .ft. -� t a 1 . =- Vs . .cc..�„ ;^aso+ - • ° , , � "" : i f 4� rnphsa :.sy.1 tt t <1,..) x w , .f a vat C t Y ra`F� �1. SwF r `ctp; - � o q..vr C (1F y "a,+ =4 • ' m.5 055.• ... 7..: a•4 a M'24•`7r'S•. .. ,ms � G a 5 8 sad ova 1psss�z.^e2x;c£' y H `�'f &tr5�vry s � 1 y �. 4 a w m e. t .W. :4 7 ti. Y; I.0 o w 5 4 - ".x 'il,'':1: a " 4 j �, uyA - c,. - . ,k, R4 -., '",, -.0 t1.[ r -, c . T k.' ' -- - ,nr vt. a s 14; , u 4: M - ''. s'k1 i a, .r N, +., bt °x i *t s rte. " :,,,t,.,.....,, n 'y r i'v.U7�ter�cA. - k P +" p' ‘ , a�.` t' o nx a g' �r. ,,a }t,�ti>•p sS e' Cro ,. 4,-�cite ,:.,, =c, v x"er"'a °Sts'6. 7�'4 d . ^9wr - a i•a ai%ris w:.a�} c: r -cos P A a�c a ?-RVr ,�. ?f . s. ' J � ",.' •'v r'�..oa b ."� ' i �x. tea; •yq 7Ti q rav a t. a aaorn� 0 .i..a 7+h r4!i s •�5 cP tlLc=it<?f i, �k'':: r. ^.,�e • ^a y -cW. +. v. Y` : -. T �.r,�. �,:a�..••. • f < d • xa 3• r6 -B-"b� rb'r" � b . t TS�7 Jfb 4 sw- w 4.1k- • - .3tr ' • 4 r d 7 '=•_ i�4" .. rr �. t k *' 6 s s4�` - eF�l�dsa �J V .s< g. - + p : ( i Y�?ri.t,�<�T,.€ -r4,jr -''"�'F } i +i t : z",.v - .0 : 'r >L^' " -o t �d• ship � Sv • k s,;^�WF c '4 t �•a a re ^+3" _.Y b v,�s�r �.av m;yf> ,..;a..5 As.sy,�1 rw .._ bm.. ..• 'LM1 C.r •,.p.' ,p•at ti`c kM� or R.._ _ + irt e, sa '3 P. N- '.7r"u x37 •'S•tq...sv rm'fi �i, r + - <M�„p •'h ..LCD} �t .••c5i.•I, •c tA�' /yam ..: r {,.'4 a"�g . •v.'�, s c.�?.ah�'Y + K`o 5- r s..st^ .aF+ ' 4 • 3 'Rc .91•• ,3. 4 - rtl: s(YI ate.. 'N Ll r C, .tty'$!,' `M 3iz'ey' h C'g!tAas;'t - 1 x9cr a,sr #T dhc� - °'_ row. aim'• �sc•'yaR"avc++ '.e^•.�:.?c i 5.. i. . r s i c cncc,, ;i•.: ''.. - ' :.'a^T w _ r . ..,. •* • D•Ifk -,, i& LI 4. • odi -d+ - pry' r. .. s' - 3 , �-,q { °' an .44: . r,. G, r.,fe .:. a :+.��u V m A. 4 ..•. oy_ , r4• .x" :akk, f • .�^._..w. 9W.. ..'t 'P 7 `:.I... - .... ' 1 ___;;.,a.- ::::ws..iAx`n »: :.Wm a ..r.. <5- .•.,a.'�:,.wrm.n. -. :ain.r� s'a:'sx.•a "'�xr,4�,. �f- HOURS ' • • . • - • • . . " " • • - %.• •'- .• re., '7, 7,S - x •-• • =..r•—• _ _ 0:2 • , A . • , " s , ." • i;••-• • OA o` s va • 7 7. . . • ••• • ;•••,, • • . •Ats . • • • . ' .. :••• ••" ..1, <7 '.. •‘.,sil -V 4.— A , '• , . . .. 7 . . .2 ..0 , • . . • , -. :',' - ., '-' • , ...,, : ' -..... ' ,. --- . ' ,.' •• ' --. - - .A: =7" ' '`' •-` , • -- ': rt: . ,,.„2 A ,.. a , • __, . ,.. 0 . .C. ,... a ,`'...;7 - oc; ,..,,,' . c...: . ::••:. .. ;Le,. .,.° ..,,...: . ,,,... , -'• .. ,i .,,, ,..,.. , , -- • -. -,'-. . - ' .• . . a•i4 • •-• • -, r 7 .4 1 .• ,- . • • . A A 1ui , ' • '`.f .,. ..- -�: .s; .r -.c\.- • -gy m ' — \ _ - •��..,:� �- '.— .7-14M111.01101.011/C1‘..',1111.111 '. -r.,�\ + �... s -r\.:.o ..2., y � c�.� : � -�• = �1 _:�.\ mac _ \ � - � a�lsw i: \ \ \ \\ 1 \ . 1 ..•■•16-. >\,: � \ gJi•. 3-. 7. .,•..i:".a..- ,.. �o1..�c- _ •a.o�r�..� .mac n.. � —°_-. \ I\ \ i _ \ c �-. r�rvsa�pc n\: , - \ \ ®�ecs - � s � ieaMln\ .< \ `r4. 1,*••ti. • .:■•• • : % . • • 11 I 't M1 • • • ?ix • *" • ••*. ••••• *IcIEZir • ;* J. t ....v ...e.1_'. - . 11 7"1:::, .77, . • , ' ' ; • •• :. „I, :: ' . •f- `, ' ' ,. •• 'A ! ' ...' c • ! ..: A t.' ! . I ,.• ' = -, .. :. -.. : W . * • '• 1 ' • • : ' - 4,ki. 3 ' • - „ , • . . , . , ... ' -.:r "11' • * 1 t ..... - . . 1,1 • .,., . " I '' ' . r ' 31 • c, ' i . . , 4 , ,14 i 1