Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L05-076 - CITY OF TUKWILA - SENSITIVE AREA SPECIAL PERMISSIONLOS -076 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM 4450 S 139 ST TO: Ryan Larson, City of Tukwila, Public Works Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction Parties of Record Project File Number: Applicant: Type of Permit applied for: Project Description: Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LDR March 2, 2006 NOTICE OF DECISION • This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. M D Page 1 of 3 Q:\Special Petmission\L05 -076- Small drainage program - NOD.doc I. PROJECT INFORMATION L05 -076 Special Permission Director for CRITICAL AREA sensitive area impacts. Ryan Larson, City of Tukwila, Public Works Department Special Permission Director for sensitive working in the buffer of a regulated watercourse. This Type 2 permit (Special Permission- Director) is to seek Director's approval for working within a Type 4 watercourse and its buffer. The existing storm water outfall will be permanently relocated because the existing storm water pipe is situated underneath a single- family residence and it is failing, endangering the structure. The proposal is to reroute the drainage through City owned rights -of -ways to a nearby portion of the stream. 4318 South 140 Street and South 139 right -of -way. E05 -006- SEPA 03 -02 -2006 Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City's SEPA responsible official has previously determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), Decision on Substantive Permit: The City's Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Special Permission Director for working in the buffer of a Type 4 watercourse complies with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application. This decision is based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report (and expressly incorporated by reference into this notice). III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. No administrative appeal of a DNS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Planning Commission of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by March 23, 2006. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. MD Page 2 of 3 Q:\Special Permission\L.05 -076- Small drainage program - NOD.doc 03 -02 -2006 • • V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging the DNS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Planning Commission decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3685 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Parties of Record 1. Ronald A. Lamb and Nancy Sandine Lamb 4251 South 139 Street Tukwila WA 98168 2. Suzanne Skadowski, Dept of the Army, Seattle District, Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 3755 Seattle WA 98124 -3755 Agencies with Jurisdiction 1. Washington State Dept. of Fish and Wildlife MD Page 3 of 3 Q:\.Special Permission \L.05 -076- Small drainage program - NOD.doc 03 -02 -2006 U . - - I- t f-- !N ..."-v �.- • ' -- q-V r Dept. Of Community Development br-. s 6pA- - -6,-- City of Tukwila zp 0cgi --eta' AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION !'a DECLARE THAT: HEREBY Notice of Public Hearing Project Name: Determination of Non- Significance Project Number: G0 - ° - 1 Notice of Public Meeting r Mailer's Signature: 4 Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Y'''" Person requesting mailing: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other /fo1(C.2 „`. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 7 day of I the year 200 6 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM u chi cam, Project Name: 1 e4 rssi c- l'er -a n' ` - Project Number: G0 - ° - 1 _ �µ r Mailer's Signature: 4 - Y'''" Person requesting mailing: ti Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 7 day of I the year 200 6 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM u chi cam, City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2006 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION This Type 2 permit (Special Permission- Director) is to seek Director's approval for working within a Type 4 watercourse and its buffer. The existing storm water outfall will be permanently relocated because the existing storm water pipe is situated underneath a single - family residence and it is failing, endangering the structure. The proposal is to reroute the drainage through City owned rights -of -ways to a nearby portion of the stream. The applicant has obtained a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from the Department of Fish and Wildlife to perform this work. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Small Drainage Program File Number: L05 -076 Applicant: Ryan Larson, City of Tukwila Location: 4318 South 140 Street, and South 139 right -of -way. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: The zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation for the subject site is Low Density Residential (LDR). Associated Permits: SEPA - E05 -006 III. BACKGROUND /PROPOSAL This project is one of the three small drainage projects undertaken by the City. This project is to fill and abandon existing storm drainpipe that is located beneath residence located at 4318 S. 140 Street. A new storm drain system and a new outfall within existing city right -of -way are proposed. This project is subject to Special Permission Director approval as it involves work in the Type 4 watercourse and its buffer. The SEPA Determination of Non - Significance was issued for this project on June 24, 2005. The HPA was issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife with a provision that the work below the ordinary high water line shall only occur between June 16 and October 15 of the calendar years 2005 -07. 1 • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • IV. COMPLIANCE WITH TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Type and Rating of the watercourses: Pursuant to the definition of a watercourse listed under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.06.920, and watercourse rating criteria listed under TMC 18.45.100, it was determined that the watercourse, where the existing outfall is and where the new outfall will be relocated is rated as a Type 4 watercourse. C. Variation of a standard Type 4 watercourse buffer: Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) addresses intrusions within stream buffers. Pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.45.110 and 18.45.070(B), construction of new utilities within the buffer of a regulated watercourse is subject to administrative review in addition to meeting the provisions of TMC 21.04 (State Environmental Policy Act) and the mitigation requirements of 18.45. Per TMC 18.45.070 (B) (6), essential utilities are permitted in the sensitive area and its buffer subject to the following criteria: a. Essential utilities must be constructed to minimize, or where possible avoid, disturbance of the sensitive area and its buffer. The project is to fill and abandon existing storm drainpipe that is located beneath the residence located at 4318 S. 140 Street. A new storm drain system and a new outfall within existing city right -of -way are proposed. This work is necessary because the existing storm water pipe situated below the single- family residence is failing, endangering the structure. Replacement of the pipe so that discharge location is not changed is not a viable option due to the topography and various improvements in the area of the current discharge. The applicant investigated other locations for this discharge and determined that rerouting the drainage through City owned rights -of -way to a nearby portion of the stream was the most practical and would impact the area the least. b. All construction must be designed to protect the sensitive area and its buffer against erosion, uncontrolled storm water, restriction of groundwater movement, slides, pollution, habitat disturbance, any loss of flood carrying capacity and storage capacity, and excavation or fill detrimental to the environment. The proposal includes rip rap at the new outfall and it extends 10 feet from the end of the pipe. Energy dissipation is accomplished in the upstream manhole. There is a nine feet drop within this structure and the outlet pipe is at a 4.2% slope. The intent of this design is to dissipate the energy within the pipe section and discharge it to the stream at a lower velocity. 2 V. RECOMMENDATION • • c. Upon completion of installation of essential utilities, sensitive areas and their buffers must be restored to pre project configuration, replanted as required and provided with maintenance care until newly planted vegetation is established. The proposal is to restore the impacted stream buffer with fiber mat and hydro seed. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued an HPA and approved the restoration. d. All crossings must be designed for shared facilities in order to minimize adverse impacts and reduce the number of crossings. Not applicable as no crossings are proposed. VI. COMMENTS In response to the notice of application for the SEPA and Special Permission permit, written comments were received from Ronald A. Lamb and Nancy Sandine Lamb. Also, attached to their comments was a letter from their Fisheries Biologist. Their concerns with the project design were addressed by an onsite meeting with the City's wetland biologist and City's Engineering consultant. They also requested that comment period be longer than 14 -days and were informed that the comment period is established by the city code, which is adopted by the City Council. However we would address any comments and concerns they may have outside the 14 -day comment period. Another comment letter was received from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stating that these projects may require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The City's Public Works Department contacted them to request clarification/direction on applicability of Corp permits and it was determined that no formal notification was required for this project. Attached is the conversation log and explanation by the City's consultant stating that the project could proceed without notification as authorized by NWP 3 i. Approval of the project to work within the buffer of a Type 4 watercourse. 3 CE te r. Man � - ..a SEPA SUBMITTAL 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM SITE NO I S 140TH ST m dle raid= J PUBLIC' WORKS DEP • ENGINEERING• STREETS • WATER •SEWER• BUILDING • Minnie Dhaliwal - Fwd: RE: Small Workliainage Project From: Sandra Whiting To: Minnie Dhaliwal Date: 9/28/05 12:15PM Subject: Fwd: RE: Small Works Drainage Project Minnie, I looked over the additional plan sheets that Ryan provided, the telephone conversation form with the Corps and the email responses from Ryan and the engineer. The plans seem fine to me. Regarding Ryan's and the engineer's concern about revegetating with native plants and removing invasives, I can see their point and can live with just hydroseeding. I also double checked the Nationwide Permit notification requirements just to be sure and it is correct that an activity under Nationwide Permit 3(i) does not require notification in this situation. So, I think they can go ahead with the work. I'll be around this afternoon if you want to discuss. Sandra »> Minnie Dhaliwal 09/28/05 09:05AM »> Sandra, Attached is the response that Ryan provided from his consultant. Page 1 Minnie Dhaliwal - RE: Small Works Dille Project Minnie, - Ryan Nelson, Thanks - Ryan From: Ryan Larson To: Minnie Dhaliwal Date: 9/28/05 7:53AM Subject: RE: Small Works Drainage Project Original Message From: Ryan Larson [mailto:rlarsonci.tukwila.wa.usl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:04 AM To: Nelson Davis Subject: Fwd: Small Works Drainage Project »> "Nelson Davis" < Nelson @kpg.com> 09/27/05 05:40PM »> Ryan, My phone memo with Suzanne from the Corps is attached. Larry has approved the dissipater (rip rap) and restoration with fiber mat and hydroseed. Other measures suggested are not in the current plans and will require change order to implement. DR Craig is having trouble getting started before the fish window closes as is, I think a change order will put us off until '06 (we may be there anyway). I think native plant enhancements in this location will require more extensive invasive control (ivy) than indicated and a commitment by the City for continued maintenance and monitoring in order for the natives to win out over the ivy. I'd be happy to meet and discuss or feel free to call. Thanks, nd KPG's response is below along with a phone record. Please review and let me know if you have any questions. The planners are looking for more information on this year's Small Drainage Projects. Could you write up a brief summary of your discussions with the Army Corps of why we do not need a permit through them? A brief email would be fine. Page 1 1 Minnie Dhaliwal - Re: Fwd: Small Work From: Ryan Larson To: Minnie Dhaliwal Date: 9/27/05 10:34AM Subject: Re: Fwd: Small Works Drainage Project Minnie, inage Project Here are my responses to Sandra's email: I have requested a summary of the consultants discussions with the Army Corps and will forward that to you when I receive it. 1. Show details of the stilling basin /dissipater that was going to be installed at the new outfall. Is the riprap that is shown on the drawing supposed to fulfill that function? I think more detail is needed. Sheet 3 of the plans shows the details of the riprap outfall. (I do not believe I provided this sheet so I will make a copy of it along with the HPA and drop them at your desk.) The riprap extends approximately 10' from the end of the pipe. A stilling basin is not proposed and energy dissipation is accomplished in the upstream manhole. There is a 9' drop within this structure and the outlet pipe is at a 4.2% slope. The intent of this design is to dissipate the energy within the pipe section and discharge it to the stream at a lower velocity. 2. Show details of what areas are going to be disturbed in the stream and in the buffer and how they will be restored Hydroseeding, if done, should be with native species. In addition to hydroseeding, some native plants (shrubs, forbs) should also be planted in the stream buffer. Additional details are provided on sheet 3. The outfall detail shows the limits of the construction. Note 5 on sheet 9 calls for the area to be hydroseeded following work. This hydroseeding is only for temporary erosion control until the native plants reestablish themselves in the disturbed area. Based on past projects, 1 do not believe that planting native species would provide any additional benefit. 3. Show details of how the existing outfall will be abandoned and if any disturbance to the stream bed or buffer is anticipated. If so, restoration should also be included in the plans. Sheet 3 shows a detail of the existing outfall to be abandoned. Note 1 describes the work to be done and the requirement of the contractor to submit a plan to the City for approval prior to performing the work. The intent is to plug the pipe then fill it with grout or CDF from above without impacting the area below the outfall. Let me knwo if you have further questions - Ryan »> Minnie Dhaliwal 09/23/05 11:54AM »> Ryan, As we discussed earlier today, please provide any additional details /letters that were submitted to Fisheries. Also, provide a copy of the correspondence with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Also, attached are some comments from Sandra. Please respond. Minnie. Page 1 Minnie Dhaliwal -Small Works Drainag tect - Page 1 1 From: Sandra Whiting To: Minnie Dhaliwal Date: 9/23/05 11:50AM Subject: Small Works Drainage Project Minnie, I reviewed the plans and in addition to what you already discussed with Ryan, I recommend the following: Show details of the stilling basin /dissipator that was going to be installed at the new outfall. Is the riprap that is shown on the drawing supposed to fulfill that function? I think more detail is needed. Show details of what areas are going to be disturbed in the stream and in the buffer and how they will be restored Hydroseeding, if done, should be with native species. In addition to hydroseeding, some native plants (shrubs, forbs) should also be planted in the stream buffer. Show details of how the existing outfall will be abandoned and if any disturbance to the stream bed or buffer is anticipated. If so, restoration should also be included in the plans. I hope this helps! Sandra September 12, 2005 Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Special Permission Approval - Sensitive Area Deviation 2005 Small Drainage Projects Dear Ms. Dhaliwal: The City of Tukwila is preparing to construct the 2005 Small Drainage Projects that include work within a Type II watercourse and its buffer. This work will involve the permanent relocation of a stormwater outfall and temporary construction impacts. This work is necessary because an existing stormwater pipe is situated below a single - family residence and the pipe is failing endangering the structure. Replacement of the pipe so that the discharge location is not changed is not a viable option due to the topography and various improvements in the area of the current discharge. The City investigated other location for this discharge and determined that rerouting the drainage through City owned rights -of -ways to a nearby portion of the stream was the most practical and would impact the area the least. The Department of Fish and Wildlife was consulted and the City has obtained an HPA to perform this work. Mitigation for this work will involve the following: The City is requesting a Sensitive Area Ordinance Deviation to allow the permanent diversion of stormwater to a new location and allow temporary construction activities within a stream buffer. Please let me know if you need any further information regarding this request. Sincerely l /44.);iv Rya arson, P.E. Se for Engineer RL enclosures: Application Checklist Site Plan (P:Projects\A- DR Projects \05DRO1 \Special Permission) l • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Public Works James F Morrow, P.E., Director • Removal and abandonment of an existing stormwater outfall • Removing trash and other debris that is currently at the new outfall location • Placing rip rap at the discharge to dissipate energy and reduce erosion • Placing a chain link fence to prevent trash and other debris from being dumped in the stream and buffer 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 433 -0179 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Washington Department of FISH and WILDLIFE Issue Date: August 24, 2005 Project Expiration Date: October 15, 2007 PERMITTEE Tukwila City of Department of Public Works ATTENTION: Ryan Larson 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2545 206 -433 -0179( ) Project Name: Project Description: HYAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL RCW 77.55.100 - Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Control Number: 102698 -1 FPA/Public Notice #: N/A AUG 2 5 2005 AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR KPG, Inc. ATTENTION: Nelson Davis 753 9th Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109 206 - 286 -1640 Fax: 206- 286 -1639 2005 Small Drainage Program Abandon one outfall and replace one outfall; location is a non -fish bearing tributary to Southgate Creek at the dead end of South 139th St. west of 45th Ave. S. The water body information listed below is incorrect due to the limitations of the permit writing software. PROVISIONS North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard Mill Creek, WA 98012 -1296 (425) 775 -1311 RECEO ED Pt IBLI iii 1VV1li0 A 1. Work below the ordinary high water line shall only occur between June 16 and October 15 of calendar years 2005 -07. 2. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled, "2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM ", dated August 2005, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. 3. The stream bank at the point of the discharge shall be armored to prevent scouring. 4. Excavation for the placement of the structure or armoring materials shall be isolated from the wetted perimeter. 5. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt -laden water from entering the stream. These may include, but are not limited to, straw bales, filter fabric, temporary sediment ponds, check dams of pea gravel - filled burlap bags or other material, and /or immediate mulching of exposed areas. 6. Prior to starting work, the selected erosion control methods (Provision 5) shall be installed. Accumulated sediments shall be removed during the project and prior to removing the erosion control methods after completion of work. 7. Wastewater from project activities and water removed from within the work area shall be routed to an area landward of the ordinary high water line to allow removal of fine sediment and other contaminants prior to being discharged to the stream. Page 1 of 4 Washington Department of FISH and WILDLIFE Issue Date: August 24, 2005 Project Expiration Date: October 15, 2007 Location #1 Outfall WRIA: 09.0001 1/4 SEC: SE 1/4 Section: 15 Location #1 Driving Directions Township: 23 N HY•AULIC PROJECT APPROVAL ® North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard RCW 77.55.100 - Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Mill Creek, WA 98012 -1296 (425) 775 -1311 8. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. 9. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. - Waterbody: Duwamish /Green River Range: 04 E Latitude: 10. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment -laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Control Number: 102698 -1 FPA/Public Notice #: N/A PROJECT LOCATIONS WORK START: August 24, 2005 IWORK END: October 15, 2007 N 47.47785 Tributary to: Elliott Bay Longitude: W 122.27932 APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS County: King This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to the provisions of the Washington State Fisheries and Wildlife Code, specifically RCW 77.55 (formerly RCW 75.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies (local, state and /or federal) that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s) performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to secure any landowner permissions or use authorizations as needed for the project. The person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s) performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and /or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.100 or 77.55.200 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.110 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the Page 2 of 4 Washington Department of FISH and WILDLIFE Issue Date: August 24, 2005 Project Expiration Date: October 15, 2007 person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER, that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.170. CHAPTER 77.55 RCW RE- CODIFIED: Chapter 77.55 RCW was re- organized and re- codified by the 2005 Legislature in Second Substitute House Bill 1346, signed into law by Governor Gregoire as Chapter 146, Laws of 2005. Chapter 146, Laws of 2005 became effective July 24, 2005. The Code Reviser's Office is in the process of completing the re- codification and conversion of the bill into - RCW. The RCW referenced at the top of this HPA has been superseded by Chapter 146, Laws of 2005. Until the re- codification process has been completed, the following reflects the section(s) of Chapter 146, Laws of 2005 under which sections of former Chapter 77.55 RCW can now be found: FORMER CHAPTER 146 TITLE 77.55 RCW LAWS of 2005 HY•AULIC PROJECT APPROVAL RCW 77.55.100 - Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW RCW 77.55.010 Sec. 406 RCW 77.55.100 Sec. 101, 201, 301, 507, 508, 601, 605 RCW 77.55.110 Sec. 101,201 RCW 77.55.150 Sec. 101, 303, 401 RCW 77.55.200 Sec. 501 RCW 77.55.210 Sec. 504 RCW 77.55.220 Sec. 101, 502 RCW 77.55.270 Sec. 101, 402 RCW 77.55.280 Sec. 403 RCW 77.55.290 Sec. 505 APPEALS INFORMATION Control Number: 102698 -1 FPA/Public Notice #: N/A North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard Mill Creek, WA 98012 -1296 (425) 775 -1311 IF YOU WISH TO APPEAL THE ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF, OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN A HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL, THERE ARE INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS (WAC 220 - 110 -340) OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.100, 77.55.110, 77.55.140, 77.55.190, 77.55.200, and 77.55.290: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 -1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30 -days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party, and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his /her supervisor. If resolution is not reached, or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Environmental Services Division Manager or his /her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his /her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal, a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS (WAC 220 - 110 -350) OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.100 OR 77.55.140: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A) The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B) An order imposing civil penalties; or (C) Any other 'agency action' for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW. Page 3 of 4 CC: Washington Department of FISH and WILDLIFE Issue Date: August 24, 2005 Project Expiration Date: October 15, 2007 A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals . Coordinator, shall be plainly labeled as 'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL' and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 -1091, within 30 -days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal, the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30 -days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.110, 77.55.200, 77.55.230, or 77.55.290: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259 -04 at Environmental Hearings Office, 4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two - Rowe Six, Lacey, Washington 98504; telephone 360/459 -6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199 -08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board, 4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two - Rowe Six, P.O. Box 40903, Lacey, Washington 98504; felephone 360/459 -6327. E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS RESULTS IN FORFEITURE OF ALL APPEAL RIGHTS. IF THERE IS NO TIMELY REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL, THE DEPARTMENT ACTION SHALL BE FINAL AND UNAPPEALABLE. ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Chandler (34) P3 HY•AULIC PROJECT APPROVAL ® North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard RCW 77.55.100 - Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Mill Creek, WA 98012 -1296 (425) 775 -1311 Control Number: 102698 -1 FPA/Public Notice #: N/A Larry Fisher Habitat Biologist 425 - 649 -7042 for Director WDFW Page 4 of 4 KP G • Architecture • Landscape Architecture • Civil Engineering • Telephone Conversation Log Date: July 28, 2005 From: Nelson Davis, KPG Subject: City of Tukwila 2005 Small Drainage Program Remarks: To: Suzanne Skadowski USAGE (206) 764 -6984 753 9'h Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98109 Tel: (206) 286 -1640 Fax: (206) 286 -1639 Called Suzanne to request clarification /direction on applicability of Corps permits to 3 proposed small drainage projects identified for construction in 2005 and 2006. I described the small drainage program as an annual program whereby the City funds maintenance and upgrade of existing drainage problems. The 3 projects were included in a recent SEPA determination by the City. The basic scope is: 1. S 140th Street — fill and abandon an existing failing culvert beneath a private residence and replace right of way conveyance system to an adjacent outfall within the right of way. 2. S 126th Street — replace existing culvert to meet fish passage requirements 3. S 133 Street — replace existing culvert to meet fish passage requirements Suzanne indicated that NWP 3(i) authorizes maintenance activities provided the following conditions are met: • The activity approximately replaces the existing system... for instance, replacement of a culvert. The culvert could be replaced at a larger diameter to allow for current conveyance needs or fish passage under this permit; however, it could not be lengthened from existing conditions. • The project meets the requirements of the Endangered Species Act and Essential Fish Habitat for systems supporting Chinook Salmon, bull trout, or other endangered species. I asked if this needed to be determined by a biologist. Suzanne indicated it did not, provided that endangered species are not using the reach. This could be determined by identifying known fish passage barriers between the site and downstream habitat areas. Coho habitat is considered critical habitat water and their presence requires notification to the USACE. S. Ska Phone memo Tukwila 2005 Small Drainage July 28, 2005 • Project meets section 106 requirements for historic preservation. Suzanne indicated that projects meeting these requirements are authorized under NWP 3 (i), without formal notification of the USAGE or acquisition of the permit. After discussing the project elements with Suzanne, I determined that sites 1 and 2 met this requirement and that no formal notification was required as follows: Site 1 — S 140th Street. The project site lies at the headwaters of a Southgate Creek tributary system with no base flow. Flows in the ravine occur as a result of the stormwater discharge and local seepage. There are no fish in the vicinity of the abandoned or replaced outfall due to the lack of base flow. Chinook and bull trout do not use the system. There are numerous barriers to upstream migration between the project site and downstream habitat areas for Coho. There are no historic structures that would be impacted, all work is within the City right of way. As the City would like to resolve the risk to the residential structure above the existing outfall, this project could proceed without notification as authorized under NWP 3(i). Site 2 — S 126th Street. The project site lies within the east branch of Riverton Creek. Similar to site 1 except resident trout are in the system at this location and there is a perennial base flow. There is a barrier to Coho salmon downstream along East Marginal Way and the SR 599 crossing. This project could proceed without notification as authorized under NWP 3 (i). Site 3 — South 133rd Street. This site lies in a Southgate Creek tributary providing critical habitat water for Coho Salmon. Notification to the Corps for NWP 3(i) is required. All projects will require HPA approval from WDFW, which typically require appropriate BMP's for erosion control and final restoration requirements. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -SP Planner: File Number: L 05' 01,67 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us SPECIAL PERMISSION DIRECTOR APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT / DEVELOPMENT: ZOQS �lr9LL ,L.3 t/z j727 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 9 O S. 13 / S /3 40C I49f Quarter: Section: /5" Township: 2.3 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: R Y/w L te,50/t/ Address: (v, ,V )r) _c �Ce/V7E, &i. 30,72 /d2 Phone: (206 - ) y3/ FAX: E -mail: OA/ el// /d �� 6" Signature: Date: C G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP \SPD doc, 06/08/05 • gy m .1 r x g oy U113'1,1 C' WORKS DES° �' + ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER•SEIFER•BUILDING+ by date °�' 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM S �F 8� BID DOCUMENTS dmin ( I � e6atted N,p 8/05 ' "^^ q Landscape e , , "'°°°°° sign 43RD AVE SITE N 0 S/S 140TH 2 ST /45TH AVE pr all my Bros file no ozz9PPRO7J1 igoi stile 810 SHOWN field bkno date revisions 0 /toy S 140TH STREET 0NC 9 453 10 98.9 3 87.3' 5. 12 CONC 9 ;.0' V:, 12 CONC 97.0' c 12 CONC 0 CONC. WALL AC 9/6 ROG :ERY IS 0VERG608 YYII WITH VEGE31.1106 11 1E 91.5' C6 615 91.72.. RLL1 91.72' IE tf_.3 V:, 12: CO7. 1 86.5• E. 12' CN')7C CONC COLL. WALL WALL .n . C j W:.0 ` A C D/W 1t'ALY \ ',•�I 7R 16 `046 514 /IGH - I' CON:. / RECCE -• __ STA 1O2tD0A9. BBt' 1T___- - __ _ -._ -� CB TYPE I 8LF 12'DISD... S =1.33x. jai of STA 102 +0015, 14.31' LT, ° D 0D CONCRETE INLET :. .... 1 911.4 93.56' IE 651' 5, 24' CM? IE B4 8' N. 24' CHP R 85 4' 6. 12' SRC; 1E 57 6' W. 1;% 64!01 DROP PIPE 99530E WHICH 4.E_ t PIPE . COVNECTS 1? 5 56 451 9230 1103346 EAVES CONC 11/4 . 12D LF 12 " CPE SO Inca..... 5 = 2.14% 6' 0419 / SVH 61' -_ R14 93:10' 15 72.1" CENTER 2 WOOD ` tea CONC 0/4 .� 2 1KGH CONC WALL SO5H 775 RIM 92.31' 5 97.8' IV, 12' CONC 11 63.3' 5, 24' CAP C 61.2' NE. 18' CONC C6 612 / CS 619 RIM 90,85' IE 69 5' W, 12' CONC 15 89 3' E, 12' CONC Dab. 1.g* STA 103+19.35, 0.9T LT" ' CB TYPE'1 LAM1 Abandon Existing Outfall 2' HIGH HEDGE LAWN,' PARKING W T GONG M.00K WALL ` ROA 88.66' !E 96.1' 5, 12" CONC tE 66.2' W, 12' CONC 11 85.9' E. 12' CONC (Y1 977 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET STA 101 +9927, 20 :65 RT f CB 'TYPE T 11 irri -STA 103+68.12, 26.06' RT .. • v ' - R E M O V E E .EXISTING.CB . . . . 'VISTA'S: NEW CB 1YPE 1 . . . STA�D}t20.6Z24.30'�L_. RIDAOVE EXISTING Cg .. .............................. . INSTALL NEW CB TYPE 1- .. • +.. 90.85 2' HIGH CON. WALL 116 LF 72'.. ....... . cpE S = .5 X CC3C WALK , COVC CHERRYB CYERRYC3 t' . . • ©lam 1 SHRV8$ 8 ROCKS •'' �•'• "br' :co coo STA.. 104+.34_60, 11.76'.11 1 CB TYPE 1 ...... ... • >fK NAIL v 5668,25 E EL59, 5345 5 7 . 4 25 5' \ 5Nr 696 RI! S6 OT 11 75 3' CENTER 16109Y1 CHOY) CHERRY K NAIL ' STA 103+97.48. 18.3 7 = 87 45 69 1.F 12' 01 SI) `,7 RT 4).1.- • ) CHERRY, CH ERRY2 STA 104+35.62. 14.90' RT 14 Ca TYPE 1L 84.10 158 LAIN C*ERRYI CED48 CHEPR72 CO N W J Q 129 I .12' 93.75 S = 90.65 84.10 .271F. . ... S. =..225%. 19 S = 120 100 80 • 60 40 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE, INCLUDING RESTORATION, SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON OTHER SITES 2. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO ALL DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS. 3. PIPE INVERTS ARE SPECIFIED TO THE PROJECTED CENTER OF THE CATCH BASIN. 4. GAS, WATER, AND SEWER SERVICES TO INDIVIDUAL HOMES ARE TYPICALLY NOT SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE SERVICES AND COORDINATE WITH UTILITY OWNER TO RELOCATE SERVICES THAT CONFUCT WITH NEW STORM DRAIN IF NECESSARY. CONSTRUCTION NOTES pt SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND RESTORE HMA PAVEMENT. SEE TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION, SHEET 2. Q ABANDON EXISTING 12' STORM DRAIN PIPE. 0 ABANDON EXISTING STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE ® SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND RESTORE HMA PAVEMENT. SEE TYPICAL DRIVEWAY DETAIL, SHEET 2. OS RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TOP SOIL AND HYRDROSEED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. © RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH CSTC OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ® SAWCUT AND REMOVE HMA PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL THICKENED EDGE SEE THICKENED EDGE DETAIL, - SHEET 2 ® ABANDON 120 LF OF 24' STORM DRAIN PIPE UNDER HOUSE. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 3. 10 CLEAR AND GRUB DITCH, INSTALL NEW STORM DRAIN PIPE AND FI1 IN DITCH TO PROVIDE GRAVEL SHOULDER FOR ROADWAY. 12 REMOVE EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE. • REMOVE AND REPLACE SIGN ON NEW POST. 21 PRESERVE AND PROTECT MAIL BOX. @,) ABANDON EXISTING 24' STORM DRAIN PIPE. I EXPIRES: 126/07 3 :02 F G y P UBLIC - WORKS' DEPT' z • ENGINEERING +STREETSsWATERsSEWER•BUILDINGt g by date 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM file BID DOCUMENTS thlW11 WT �� tec � °' � °°"r°°"°" °" o .,) Design o checked fix 6/05 SITE NO 2 43RD AVE S/S I4OTH ST /45TH AVE S �oj en IA11 8/05 no 052OPPROaI PrOi A field bk 1,o , 0 0 I NFL P baWCY 454 fi 42 , 0 0 g'C WALL SI to �` O TH STREEt igs 0 LAW : L• Ti E • .. 11' Y•Y 12 7 1 LAM w l/) 1- V1 LJ 6 10 D/W CONC. 0/ o' 1e COW: IE 79 6 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET .^.?AV. D/t/ S =2.237. WALK 51114P16 IE Ca 4C PIECES GATE STUUP25 MATCH UNE STA 11 +00 SHEET 9 0 -0451111111~' '\ \ UNDEVELOPED C8 959 R:M 75.19' 1E 730 w,12'COMC 1E 12' CONC 1E '3.a' E. 12' CONC T STA .107 +36.55, 38.18 LT T ..C8r1PE1L. +. .. c �, •.....S =3.88$ .. RA S'TA 107+17.42, 11.130 '.RT n co X:J . CB TYPE. 1 Laf n n .. 7 12 — x.. ... 75:39 WM 1062 RIM 75.82' 1E 66.5' CENTER 1•fl.CPED © 12' CONC E 75.7 PK NAIL STA 10+24.62 & STA 107+37.07, 24.08' RT ELLV = 76.66 PK NPR K 5661 40 E 5684 82 ELEV 76.66' CO 03 0 -- - STA 105:83.16, - 8.48` RT CB .TYPE TL 125 LF 18' CPE SD STA , 107+1 .63. 5.30` RT CB TYPE 11. LATH.. . SOLID LOCKING .UD STA - 107 +07.16 1291' R7 31 ..INS ............... . ..... 75.90. ..: . 74.23. 1■ 120 100 80 4a L`;.._. 60 75.10 40 A GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE, INCUJDING RESTORATION, SHALL COMPLETED PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON OTHER SEES 2. CONTRACTOR MUST PRUDE CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO ALL DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS. 3. PIPE INVERTS ARE SPECIRED TO THE PROJECTED CENTER OF THE CATCH BASIN. 4. GAS, WATER, AND SEWER SERVICES TO INDJMDUAL HOMES ARE _ TYPICALLY NOT SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE SERVICES AND COORDINATE WITH UTILITY OWNER TO RELOCATE SERVICES THAT CONFLICT WITH NEW STORM DRAIN IF NECESSARY. CONSTRUCTION NOTES Q SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND RESTORE MA PAVEMENT. SEE TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION, SHEET 2. ® SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND RESTORE HMA PAVEMENT. SEE TYPICAL DRIVEWAY DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS PATH TOP SOIL AND HYRDROSEED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ® SAWCUT AND REMOVE HMA PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL THICKENED EDGE. SEE THICKENED EDGE DETAIL. SHEET 2. 11 CONSTRUCT/RECONSTRUCT HMA SPILLWAY TO DITCH. REMOVE EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE PRESERVE AND PROTECT MAIL BOX INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER ON CULVERT END. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. EXPIRES: 1126/07 G 100 80 40 60 20 • • . • .• • • ....... .. -••• ...... • ..... • •-• \\ , '• ' _rz) 11113 LI 6 Tiro K si ENGINEERING* STREETS * WATER • S EWER * B UILDLIN G * Replace Outfall Rip Rap T; 1,--1 63 ; i . - ( t,- , Replace Existing Pipe with new 18" CPE Pipe_ 1, ;.. ,• 5.35172 . : - . ,.. • . . . 'I / • / I. • • h; • / ' C - . • - \,- .., ./.-- — LAM - • N ` 4 1 1 \ i . • i r. • t*- / '. ■ I - / 6,7i , 7: - . ? :),,,i :J \.,,, •::''- I' c54C ii. •.72.2' 1 I _ .4 „ 1 < \ / / •" 5 LAhN 0510 20 SCALE IN FEET 60 e 59.5 ••• 0-1.K -F. • ,i1 ............. •• • • Architecture Landscape Archmecture Loithoulh, Urban Dear: ......... C.4ERP.11.5. LAr, 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL Si- 12.55 RA! 55.80 iE 55.5' S 139TH STREET 100 80 60 40 2C SiTE NO 2 S 140TH STREET GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO ALL DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS. 2. PIPE INVeRTS ARE SPECIFIED TO THE PROJECTED CENTER OF THE CATCH BASIN. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM no date revisions B 3 IL IJ file DO 052OP?R9&2G sok as sHow), date r105 0 6 I. t' o v R UBLI C WORKS DER T'_ _ • ENGINEERING +STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING• by date 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM S me - � • 1908 8/05 BID DOCUMENTS dm 11JT I Ar e311.etwe Landscape A""'°`L°v cm] Urban Deaign I p checked NM 8/05 Po K n 8/05 SITE NO 2 43RD AVE S / S 140TH ST/45TH AVE BD 052OPPRO9� AS Ito 08/05 I SEWER uANHOLE PELD LOCAID LAY.,' CRAY. LAIN (7RAV - D 100 80 60 40 i 20 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET 141 1F 18'(p c SO S 4:98x. - . — - - 63.30 •-} STA 1T +84.10: 19.98` LT INLET ........_..._ _... .. LAZY. IN SOLI' APPROX. LOCATION • STA 10+27:57, 4.39' LT 18 CED16 If C(NRC 1E 63.3' e PVC 1E 659' LAV7. 5 ' SILK 12 CONC I t! $ = 4.212 70 N / — N m Z m .................... SNN '375 P.L. E 56.1 CFNIER S 139TH STREET CAiE LAIN CHERRY16 IE 71.2' \ • x P °�a �. / D /W fte i � 111E Ji: MATCH UNE STA 11 +00 THIS SHEET 8 610t:. IN CASE n. 5991 26 E 5691.72 ELEV, 65.2E 6S 12 CON E. 62.2' 100 41:LF 18* OPUS -2 83X 47,00 STA 12 +56.04, 204.02 -LT CONSTRUCT OUTFALL ' SEE DETAIL, SHEET 3 80 60 20 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE, INCLUDING RESTORATION. SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ON OTHER SITES. 2. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO All DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS. 3. PIPE INVERTS ARE SPECIFIED TO 'THE PROJECTED CENTER OF THE CATCH BASIN. GAS, WATER, AND SEVER SERVICES TO INDIVIDUAL HOMES ARE TYPICALLY NOT SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE SERVICES AND COORDINATE WITH UTILITY OWNER TO RELOCATE SERVICES THAT CONFUCT WITH NEW STORM DRAIN IF NECESSARY. CONSTRUCTION NOTES Q SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND RESTORE MA PAVEMENT. SEE TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION, SHEET 2. 0 RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH TOP SOIL AND HYRDROSEED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS EITH CSTC OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENG1NEER- 14 INSTALL TYPE 1 6' CHAIN LNK FENCE WITH 14' ACCESS GATE. SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN L -2 AND L -3. 15 REWIRE DISTURBED AREAS WITH COCONUT FIBER MATTING AND HYDROSEED. 21 PRESERVE AND PROTECT MAIL BOX • INSTALL DEBRIS BARRIER ON CULVERT END. SEE DETAIL SHEET 2. • CONSTRUCT OUTFALL PROTECTION. SE DETAIL, SHEET 3. 1 EXPWES: 1/26/07 } egs WG CON C CONC 6' WOOD 1. 1. THE INTENT OF THIS DETAIL IS TO ABANDON f%\ AN EXISTING 24' -STORM DRAIN PIPES AND �\ / LF D21 I ' STRUCTURES BY FIWNG 100% OF THE PIPE AND STRUCTURE VOLUME WITH GROUT TO THE J 7� `\ TS SHOWN ON THS B E CONC / ` i NTRACT�t SHALL SUBMIT NIT A SEQ0 UENCING BLOCK PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER THAT CO .E f T ' OUTLINES THE PROPOSED MATERIAL AND AT ;" INCLUDING THE USE OF TEMPORARY PLUG AND / J TUB U B x SEQUENCING INFORMATION. ACTUAL MATERIAL ; i FILL AND - ABANDON - 120 - 11 - EXISTING —; _ ' _ 1 AR, METHODOLOGIES WALL BE PER THE IN PIPE % ■ 6 WPPRbVFD SEQUENCING PLAN AS PREPARED / I BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. - - 1 1 I 1 — —1- - - y- 1 � / <- \ \ * 1 W 1 i \ \ N. ,,, GA T E c f \ I , ONO / AWN ` D W r j SPR CF1n �I �/ , ,��' w RIM = 9231; , 87.8 W, 12' CON ." IE 83.3 S. 24' CMP `, �` y{ ' 1E81.2N 24' CON IT G ATP" i • 102 1 � CON PLOCK PATIO HOUSE EAVES CED20 IE 6&9, 24' CMP 90 CED20 l�. ( CED14 y' GATE 6' CALK — 70 I 1� 2' WOOD GENERAL NOTES: D • • 1 El ate 1.'. ..01ES∎ 11MIS. -�_ IM @ 7111 ' ma®me ®mss ® - ®gym: -_: ®steam ® ®rv: mama sax/. so . °^LjTS 7f% ... :." • r_Xr_ §., r�z....,^' :. G L? n a fi?� ri.:`.' STORM DRAIN PIPE TO BE ABANDONED SITE NO 2, SHEET 7 SCALE 1' =10' 24' CPE STORM DRAIN PIPE FINISHED GRADE, 21 MAX SLOPE PLACE COCONUT FIBER MAT ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND HYDROSEED PLACE LARGE ROCK FROM BOTTOM OF EXISTING CHANNEL TO OUTFALL INVERT ElEV 47.01 GEOTEXT1LE FABRIC OUTFALL DETAIL SITE NO 2, SHEET 9 NTS 1dt 2 LAYER MIN ua tr LOO tr-41111111111___ 111 11 ab RtPRAP - CV i 67 I EXPES: 1/26/07 .I u V 3 Nue 6 by date IMPQ � , c� a.,1 tnitiaassang Urban 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM tae a 1 BL/c woes DAP T_ J • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING• %% de8Wied 8/05 BID DOCUMENTS &VD WIT o ame DETAILS �� , no o5ZDDEToaD Frd) d1r swe AS mini Mitt no no date ret ool date D8/05 CON C CONC 6' WOOD 1. 1. THE INTENT OF THIS DETAIL IS TO ABANDON f%\ AN EXISTING 24' -STORM DRAIN PIPES AND �\ / LF D21 I ' STRUCTURES BY FIWNG 100% OF THE PIPE AND STRUCTURE VOLUME WITH GROUT TO THE J 7� `\ TS SHOWN ON THS B E CONC / ` i NTRACT�t SHALL SUBMIT NIT A SEQ0 UENCING BLOCK PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER THAT CO .E f T ' OUTLINES THE PROPOSED MATERIAL AND AT ;" INCLUDING THE USE OF TEMPORARY PLUG AND / J TUB U B x SEQUENCING INFORMATION. ACTUAL MATERIAL ; i FILL AND - ABANDON - 120 - 11 - EXISTING —; _ ' _ 1 AR, METHODOLOGIES WALL BE PER THE IN PIPE % ■ 6 WPPRbVFD SEQUENCING PLAN AS PREPARED / I BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. - - 1 1 I 1 — —1- - - y- 1 � / <- \ \ * 1 W 1 i \ \ N. ,,, GA T E c f \ I , ONO / AWN ` D W r j SPR CF1n �I �/ , ,��' w RIM = 9231; , 87.8 W, 12' CON ." IE 83.3 S. 24' CMP `, �` y{ ' 1E81.2N 24' CON IT G ATP" i • 102 1 � CON PLOCK PATIO HOUSE EAVES CED20 IE 6&9, 24' CMP 90 CED20 l�. ( CED14 y' GATE 6' CALK — 70 I 1� 2' WOOD GENERAL NOTES: D • • 1 El ate 1.'. ..01ES∎ 11MIS. -�_ IM @ 7111 ' ma®me ®mss ® - ®gym: -_: ®steam ® ®rv: mama sax/. so . °^LjTS 7f% ... :." • r_Xr_ §., r�z....,^' :. G L? n a fi?� ri.:`.' STORM DRAIN PIPE TO BE ABANDONED SITE NO 2, SHEET 7 SCALE 1' =10' 24' CPE STORM DRAIN PIPE FINISHED GRADE, 21 MAX SLOPE PLACE COCONUT FIBER MAT ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND HYDROSEED PLACE LARGE ROCK FROM BOTTOM OF EXISTING CHANNEL TO OUTFALL INVERT ElEV 47.01 GEOTEXT1LE FABRIC OUTFALL DETAIL SITE NO 2, SHEET 9 NTS 1dt 2 LAYER MIN ua tr LOO tr-41111111111___ 111 11 ab RtPRAP - CV i 67 I EXPES: 1/26/07 .I u V 3 Nue 6