Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L07-001 - FOLEY JEFF - SHORT PLATFOLEY SHORT PLAT 14011 MACADAM RD S L07 -001 WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Grantor: Jeffrey R. Foley Grantee: The City of Tukwila Legal Description (Abbreviated): A Portion of the SE V4 of the SE'/, Sec. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., WM. Full Legal Description is found on Exhibit `A' of this document. Assessor's Tax Parcel ID Numbers: 152304 -9035 CRITICAL SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT This covenant and hold harmless agreement is entered into between Jeffrey R. Foley, an individual ( "Grantor), and the City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantee "). RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor owns and has applied for necessary permits to develop certain real property (the "Property ") legally described in Exhibit `A', which is attached and incorporated by reference. WHEREAS, a portion of the Property contains sensitive areas and the Property is adjacent to sensitive areas of potential geologic instability (potential slide areas). WHEREAS, as a condition of the issuance of short subdivision approval, land use permits, and /or construction permits for the Property, the Grantee required the Grantor to execute and record this "Sensitive Area Covenant and Hold Harmless Agreement" to hold the City of Tukwila harmless from all loss incurred as a result of any landslide or seismic activity, or soil disturbance. WHEREAS, Grantor assumed this obligation in order to obtain said short subdivision approval under permit no. L07 -001, and/or construction permits for the Property. 1 of 5 WHEREAS, Grantor has performed geological reports and evaluations, prepared by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E., dated November 12, 2006; July 26, 2007; April 6, 2008; and reports were peer reviewed by Golder Associates, Inc., dated April 25, 2008. WHEREAS, the parties agree that this agreement constitutes an arms length, bargained - for agreement, which includes a waiver of liability that runs with the land for risks created by the proposed use of property because of the shape, composition, location or other characteristic unique to the Property sought to be developed. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. In consideration of Grantee issuing development permits, which constitutes good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which and the sufficiency of which the Grantor hereby acknowledges, the Grantor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Grantee, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and assigns harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, or suits, whether brought by grantor or third parties, including all legal costs and reasonable attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with any injuries or damages to persons or property caused in whole or in part by any landslide or seismic activity or soil disturbance on the Property, legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by reference. 2. Grantor on its own behalf and on behalf of its heirs, successors and assigns hereby waives any right to assert any claim against the Grantee, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and assigns for any loss, or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting from any landslide or seismic activity or soil disturbance on said Property by reason of or arising out of the issuance of the permit(s) by the City for development on said Property except only for such losses that may directly result from the sole negligence of the City. 3. Grantor will inform its successors and assigns of said Property that the Property is in an area of potential geologic instability (potential slide area), of the risks associated with development thereon, of any conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City of Tukwila, and of any features in this design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soils changes. 4. Grantee's inspection or acceptance of any of the Grantor's construction or other work either during construction or when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. 5. This covenant and hold harmless agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and the rights and obligations contained herein shall run with and burden the Property, including each parcel comprising the Property and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Grantor and Grantee, their successors and assigns. 2 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said individual have caused this instrument to be executed this day of , 2008. STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. County of King ) Property Owner / Grantor I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said individual acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at My appointment expires 3 of 5 DATED this day of , 2008. GRANTEE: CITY OF TUKWILA Mayor Attest/Authenticated: Approved As to Form: City Clerk City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of King ) On this day of , 2008, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , known to me to be the Mayor, of CITY OF TUKWILA, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. 4 of 5 print name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at EXHIBIT `A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; T • THENCE NORTH 40'20'25" WEST ALONG SAID WEST' LINE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET. TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE BIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, . AN ARC DISTANCE IF 24.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG • SAID CURVE, A ARC DISTANCE OF 24.51 .FEET; . THENCE NORTH 8517 WEST 180.67 FEET TO A POINT' ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'32" WEST 375 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE. SOUTH 10'44'32" EST 106 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51" EAST 197.60 FEET TO .A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 08'55'10" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF. BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 08'55'10" WEST 81.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE. SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 15, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION' OF •THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK • COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; THENCE NORTH 40%5D20'25". WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE' 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS.' OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08'55'10" EAST 81.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51" EAST 169.0 FEET TO APPOINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID JAMES CLARK COUNTY. ROAD, SOUTHERLY 72 ''FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; •THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE . 72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID. NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST' 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'42" EAST 378.6 FEET; • THENCE SOUTH 10'44'32" EAST 125 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'56'42" WEST T A POINT 125 FEET SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 125 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 205 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4. OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SECTION. 5 of 5 LAND DIVISION LAND DEVELOPMENT Timeline for Foley Short Plat (L07 -001) 14011 Macadam Road South, Tukwila, WA Summary— Jeff Foley submitted an application for a 4 -lot short plat on a property with a wetland, watercourse and some slopes at 14011 Macadam Road, S., Tukwila. In exchange for filling the on -site wetland and reducing a buffer, Mr. Foley requested to create and enhance wetlands offsite on City of Tukwila property and to enhance the reduced stream buffer on his property. This work was proposed to support Mr. Foley's four -lot short plat application. It was approved with a Special Permission Direction ( #L08 -067) in December, 2008. Environmental review for the Short Plat and Special Permission Director was combined (E07 -013). Additonal information was needed for the Short Plat review. After several requests for additional information, and over one year of inactivity, the short plat application was canceled in February, 2010, approximately three years after the date of application. No work was done for the off -site mitigation. 1/17/07 Application received for 4 -lot short plat at 14011 Macadam Rd. S. (L07 -001) 1/31/07 Incomplete application— Notice and request for additional materials w /in 90 days sent to Jeff Foley 7/23/07 Deadline for incomplete application extended to 8/13/07. Notice sent to Jeff Foley 8/1/07 Additional materials received (i.e. Technical Information Report – TIR /Geotec, Stormwater system, survey). Application still incomplete 8/8/07 Second incomplete application notices sent to Jeff Foley. Sensitive Areas study and analysis, watercourse and wetland studies needed. Notice of complete application L07 -001 issued Additional information on SEPA, geotechnical, sight distance, etc. needed to continue project review. Request for additional information sent to Jeff Foley Meeting with Sharon Mann and Jeff Foley (owners), Bruce MacVeigh , P.E., Dave McPherson (Tukwila PW), Jim Shannon (DEA), Sandra Whiting, Minnie Dhaliwal, Rebecca Fox (Tukwila DCD) to clarify expectations, information requests 2/8/08 Additional SEPA information to address Tukwila request (11 /27 /07)received from Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. 05/01/2012 H: \Foley Short Plat #L07- 001 \Project Timeline -- April, 2012 \Foley Project Timelin-- L07- 001.docx • 3/3/08 Sight distance information to address Tukwila request (11/27/07) received from Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. 3/3/08 Wetland study received from David Evans and Associates. Sight Distance study received from Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. 4/10/08 Geotech report received from Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. 4/23/08 Revised Geotech report received from Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. 10/17/08 Conceptual driveway /layout received from Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. 11/18/08 Additional information (i.e. cut and fill amounts, use of barn, most recent short plat plans with footprints /elevations, infiltration) requested for continued review of Short Plat (L007 -001). 12/8/08 Determination of Non - Significance s issued (E07 -014) for short plat (L07 -001) 12/30/08 Special Permission Director (L08 -068) approved to perform off -site wetland mitigation in support of the 4 -lot short plat (L -07 -001) 1/25/10 Jeff Foley advised that Short Plat (L07 -001) will be canceled if additional information requested via letter of 11/18/08 is not received by 2/25/10 2/25/10 Application L07 -001 canceled 05/01/2012 H: \Foley Short Plat #L07- 001 \Project Timeline -- April, 2012 \Foley Project Timelin-- L07- 001.docx J January 25, 2010 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director RE: Proposed Short Plat ( #L07 -001) -- Inaction Dear Mr. Foley: Jim Haggerton, Mayor In November, 2008, the City of Tukwila sent you the attached letter requesting information that was needed to continue reviewing your application. This information has not been received, and over one year has elapsed. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC 18.104.130 states that if an applicant fails to provide a requested correction or additional information within 90 days of the request, the Department may cancel the application due to inactivity. After more than one year, we have not received the information that was requested. Please be advised that the application will be canceled if this information requested in the letter is not provided by February 25, 2010. If the application is canceled, you will need to reapply if you wish to proceed with the short plat. If you have questions, you may contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via email rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us . Sincerely, Kc'/a�C4. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. rf 1 H:\Foley Short Plat #L07- 001\ Fol ey - -L07- 001-- Close.File.1.25.10.doc 01/25/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194` St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 November 18, 2008 • • RE: Special Permission Director (L08 -068) Short Plat (L07 -001) Dear Mr. Foley: We have received materials for your Special Permission Director application. Please provide the following additional information at your as soon as possible so that we may proceed with review of your project. We have revised our request slightly since sending you the letter dated November 13, 2008. Please use this letter, rather than the letter dated November 13, 2008. 1) Cut and Fill Provide complete and current cut and fill amounts and categories. How much fill will be used for the wetland? How much cut and fill for road access, other site work, etc.? The Geotechnical Evaluation from Bruce MacVeigh (rev. 4/23/08) says that "significant earthwork" will be required. The SEPA checklist (rev. 2/08) item B. 1. e indicates that there will be 1, 200 cu. ft. of cut (relocated on site), and 1, 500 cu. ft. of fill (including filtration trench), for a total of 2, 700 cu. ft . Both of these documents predate your decision to do offsite mitigation and fill the wetland on site. We need the most current information that takes into account your plans to fill the wetland on the short-plat site. 2) Barn Do you still intend to use the barn? Will it be demolished? Will you use the barn foundation for a future house, or will you locate the new house in a different spot on lot #4 now that the wetland and buffer are available? 3) Plans Rf 1 01/25/2010 H:\Foley Short Plat #L07- 001Ueff Foley-- info.request.l 1.13.08 #2.doc Provide copies of the most recent short plat plans, including civil, with dates indicating when they were drawn. Show footprints of all future houses. Provide finished floor elevations. Provide a road elevation. (rev. 11/18/08) 4) Infiltration Will infiltration be used for the entire site? Confirm that infiltration via a common main trench will be used for all impervious areas on site, including the new residences. Will any of the lots be served by a vault ?(rev. 11/18/08) Please provide this information soon as possible so that we may proceed with review of your project. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner cc. Bruce MacVeigh Rf 2 01/25/2010 H:1Foley Short Plat #L07- 001Veff Foley-- info.request.11.13.08#2.doc Dear Mr. Foley: 1) Cut and Fill • Guy of Tukwila Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 November 13, 2008 s44-iv-r PL—AV RE: .Spertai e (L07 -001) • Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director We have received materials for your Special Permission Director application. Please provide the following additional information at your as soon as possible so that we may proceed with review of your project. Provide complete and current cut and fill amounts and categories. How much fill will be used for the wetland? How much cut and fill for road access, other site work, etc.? The Geotechnical Evaluation from Bruce MacVeigh (rev. 4/23/08) says that "significant earthwork" will be required. The SEPA checklist (rev. 2/08) item B. 1. e indicates that there will be 1, 200 cu. ft. of cut (relocated on site), and 1, 500 cu. ft. of fill (including filtration trench), for a total of 2, 700 cu. ft . Both of these documents predate your decision to do offsite mitigation and fill the wetland on site. We need the most current information that takes into account your plans to fill the wetland on the short-plat site. 2) Barn Do you still intend to use the barn? Will it be demolished? Will you use the foundation for a future house? Will you locate any new house in a different spot on lot #4? 3) Plans Provide a copies of the most recent short plat plans, including civil, with dates indicating when they were drawn. 4) Infiltration Will infiltration be used for the entire site? Confirm that infiltration via a common main trench will be used for all impervious areas on site, including the new residences. Rf 1 11/13/2008 Jim Haggerton, Mayor rr 1 r1 o� oglu 1 ,, 'Iwo ,1 6300 Southcenter oulevar , Suite 6' • ' ukwrla, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • Please provide this information at your earliest convenience so that we may proceed with review of your project. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner cc. Bruce MacVeigh RT 2 11/13/2008 H:\Foley Short Plat #L07- 001V efTFoley-- info.request.I 1.13.08.doc • • Rebecca Fox - Foley Short Plat, Special Permission conditions From: Sandra Whiting To: Rebecca Fox Date: 11/06/2008 1:47 PM Subject: Foley Short Plat, Special Permission conditions Page 1 of 1 • y :.•..f: ..ewRN•:K. Y31.4m4101-ps 74vr,::20tVaaiWV.V..1 . 1 a. . ..:• P. rMOe Upon review of the revised Wetland Mitigation Plan and Specifications, dated September 11, 2008, the following are the recommended conditions for the Special Permission Director for wetland filling at the short plat site (in addition to carrying out and complying with the approved off -site wetland mitigation plan): 1. The applicant shall ensure, as part of the short plat development, that current drainage that runs through the ditch and existing wetland, continues to discharge to the watercourse channel located off -site to the south (either by maintaining an open ditch or putting the drainage into a pipe). Proposed drainage shall be shown on site plans for approval by the City. 2. The applicant shall sign a wetland mitigation agreement with the City and pay the required fee to the City for use of City property, prior to commencing any mitigation work. 3. In lieu of the standard Sensitive Area sign required for wetland mitigation projects (as shown in the detail on sheet WM -7), the applicant shall install a sign at the construction access road along S 144th to inform the public about the project. The sign shall state: "Wetland mitigation project underway. Contact the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development at 206- 431 -3670 for more information." 4. The applicant shall be responsible for maintenance and monitoring at the off -site mitigation location, in accordance with the approved mitigation plan, for a period of 5 years. 5. The applicant's monitoring and maintenance contractors shall notify Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department at least 24 hours prior to each monitoring or maintenance visit (206- 433 - 7157). 6. The applicant shall provide a cash assignment in the amount of 150% of the cost of the mitigation. Sandra file•//C • \temn \YPlrnWi ce \dQ 1 nfiilr_mai l(.2f1f1_nn 1 (1(11 2d122 G 1 1 Q')RR 1 \(= \>;11(VVl(1 11/1Z/')1114 DATE: TO: FROM: April 9, 2007 Jeff Foley Kirk Moughamer Biologist DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Memorandum SUBJECT: Wetland and Wetland Buffer Conditions on King County Parcel # 1523049035 PROJECT: Foley Short Plat PROJECT NO.: JEF000000001 David Evans and Associates Inc. (DEA) has conducted field reconnaissance of King County parcel # 1523049035, located at 14011 Macadam Road South. The property is located in the City of Tukwila (City), King County, Washington, in Township 23 N, Range 04 E, Section 15. The site is a developed 1.68 -acre property with two existing structures ON -SITE INVESTIGATION The parcel is composed of mixed conifer /deciduous forest on the undeveloped slope to the west, and disturbed areas graded for the existing structures. The property currently contains one residential home built in the 1920s, one barn /garage, and an existing compacted gravel driveway that enters the property from the southeast corner. South of the barn is a broad flat area that was likely used for grazing livestock. Two wetlands were delineated on the property. Both wetlands occur along the toe of slope at the western edge of the developed portion of the property. These wetlands are considered palustrine scrub /shrub wetlands, with hydrology provided by seeps at the slope break. These wetlands are rarely inundated with water and are often only saturated to the surface. Hydrology on the site has been altered over time. Cuts made into the slope in order to flatten and develop the area for housing and grazing exposed subsurface flows that contribute to the hydrology of the area. The presence of hydrology, predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and the presence of hydric soils qualify these areas as wetland. Both wetlands and their buffers are disturbed due to the proximity to human activities including grazing, gravel stockpiling, existing structures and the presence of invasive species. REGULATION City Code regulates development parameters around wetlands and their buffers through Chapter 18.45. Designations, ratings, and buffers for wetlands are detailed in section 18.45.080; uses, alterations, and mitigation are outlined in section 18.45.090. Wetland A is considered a Type 3 wetland, which requires a 50 -foot buffer and a building setback of 10 feet. City Code defines a Type 3 wetland as "...those wetlands that are greater than 1,000 square feet and less than one acre in size with two or fewer wetland classes." Wetland B does not fit the description provided for a Type 3 wetland above because it is less than 1,000 square feet in size. Wetland B is approximately 250 square feet in size. City Code does not provide protections or development parameters around wetlands less than 1,000 square feet. 415 - 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005 -3518 Phone: (425) 519 -6500 Facsimile: (425) 519 -5361 Jeff Foley April 9, 2007 Page 2 RECOMMENDED BUFFER WIDTH Wetland A has been evaluated utilizing the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. This methodology has been developed to evaluate wetland values based on the functions provided. Using the rating system Wetland A was classified as a Category IV slope wetland scoring 20 points. Wetland A provides minimal water quality function (4 points) and minimal hydrologic function (3 points). The primary function provided by this wetland is wildlife habitat (13 points). Efforts to enhance wildlife habitat within the proposed buffer would further improve the primary function of this wetland. Buffer reduction is permitted under City Code section 18.45.080(G), which permits a reduction of no more than 50 percent of the standard buffer. For Wetland A DEA recommends a reduced wetland buffer of 25 ft with enhancement of the existing 25 foot buffer. The buffer currently contains compacted soils with bluegrass (Poa sp.), velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Buffer enhancement activities could include the planting of native shrubs and ground cover and soil amending activities to support their growth. Native shrub species may include Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta), vine maple (Acer circinatum), Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa) or other species suitable to the site. The goal of buffer enhancement activities will be to remove non - native plant species and increase the ability of the buffer to protect wetland functions including wildlife habitat. Wetland B is not regulated under City Code 18.45.080(B), however, impacts to this wetland should be avoided. Buffer reduction with enhancement requires a buffer enhancement plan and a Type II permit from the City pursuant to 18.45.080G.2. Under 18.45.080G.5 the City requires subsequent corrective actions and long -term monitoring of the project if adverse impacts to regulated wetlands or their buffer are identified. DEA recommends coordinating with the City to identify the scope of "corrective actions" and "long -term monitoring ". The classifications and recommendations provided above are based on DEA's professional opinion developed through review of background information and considerations for documentation and site conditions at the time of the investigation. The City may require protections greater than those outlined above. Enclosures: none KM:pm p: \j \jefo00000001 \0300com \07 -0330 city memojfoley.doc CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS • APPROVALS: • Reviewed Examined and approved this day of 20_ RECORDING NO. VOL. /PAGE and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee __ and hereby certified for filing this day of Assessor DECLARATION Know all men by these presents that we, the undersigned, y P owner(s) in fee simple of the land herein described do hereby make a SHORT PLAT. The undersigned further declare this SHORT PLAT to be a graphic representation of said SHORT PLAT of said and some is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF we set our hands and seals. Chairman. snort Subdivision Committee Deputy Assese'r Account Number 1523049035 PORTION OF SE SE 1/4 of 1/4, S._15_ T.__ N., R._4_E., W.M. - - -- - - -- EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M DESCRIBED / AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15 WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD , N0. 2; T THENCE NORTH 40'20'25' WEST ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25' WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE IF 24.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, A ARC DISTANCE OF 24.51 FEET; THENCE ' NORTH 8517'33' WEST 180.67 FEET TO A POINT'ON THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE. SOUTH 10' GOVERNMENT LOT 1, WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'32' WEST 375 FEET FROM THE 44'32." EST 106 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51" EAST 197.60 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 08'55'10' EAST I N T 5'1' WEST 8142 FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 08'50S. FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 11 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION' OF • THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST UNE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; THENCE NORTH 40%5D20'25" WEST ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08'55'10' EAST 81.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51" EAST 169.0 FEET TO APPOINT ON THE ( N. s f ' C I L st�4 �= c -.-'z,-- -�, ; i u 1 ` - � " � \ t om �•• • C.. �.:i • � jw. ; mss . , - •�;< - " " r� • l 3,. ! , , ` / ^{ap \ • ''',.,i'4.: s /TE �V X f �$�� =- 1 =N T '� U � ti' . �.� +1 ai. � -�� --,r W r r ty � --' 1 s • �` �y yz lf x is., /;; , � ,,, t_ '- � � - 5+ .. s '- . • �* \ �� CONTINUING Name Nome Name Name Name Name State of Washington County of ' - `l F ti . Syr• 1 i s , r 3 j � i s 'l l - , I ; � ti s • U 1r= I i ,.. r to ,: , ,\ N..;" ,, - _ • On this day personally appeared be fore me I ,,': '. J StMf�,. ` — j I X \1 "` 1�S -S '>• I i „ , 1 r to me known to be the individual who ,. • 1 c a+,ema,.7L � f — L executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the he /she signed the same os his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand a seal this day of I — 7 . �! . ;,�',� was p io s ( l L=�" — 1 ° © " hT s, i u! - •ti }, I Signature s r r m , _ 1r 1 ;1• 07NAIR7 9GDT e1OOeAisesi w U WESTERLY UNE OF SAID JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD, SOUTHERLY 72'IFEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;' EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'42' EAST 378.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10'44'32" EAST 125 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'56'42' WEST T A POINT 125 FEET SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 125 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 205 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SECTION. o Lot 1 L i . Lot 2 w£ • N� R L =5.91' N s jo 70 0 __ °t - ■R 10.00 g+ N p L � -_ N86'21 '332_ a N E 55.4 ' ` 375.00' (Deed – Held) 57' (Ref. ROS 109/11) (Ref. ROS 109 N874e4tYw ( 58910' Ref. Ras 109 /1 1) SITE i /. Control Detail: Name as commissioned Title My appointment expires State of Washington County of On this day personally appeared be fore me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged then he /she signed the some as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand o seal this day of f$ ar R.p'Z ?' � -- 588'21'32"W �: m ." 204.94' o• 00 � 60. 23' a i • Ng6K1'32'E _ A ut N6_6 _1i E T.i � New 20' access an NUes easement o , � 0 0 � Lot 3 ' 7'ryo. $ i J IB ? /I Lot 4 DE TAIL: 4I Tit Signature me \ Found Wass nos In concrete —� e) in case in case – 5/25/06 o Name as commissioned z y 1 Southeast comer Section 15, T23N, R4E, W.M. - Found 2' brass dlak vi/'X' In concrete In case - VOL. /PAGE ��o c''i ' I '7 Title My appointment expires ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT m g w ' , SCALE: 1" = 30' ■1 _ zo.' t48,5•36•45.1 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of 20 at M • in book of at page at the request of � � �• ri arc S L °` '. 4.4 "e1 dvv✓.'•i J Mgr. Supt. of Records LAND SURVYOR'S CERTIFICATE .'/i:t , I . t';;/ /,vorl , registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that this plat is based on an. actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and .angles, are shown thereon correctly and that monuments other than those monuments approve • .r, se tine . • ;a' later date, ' have: been set and lot cot r. ; f round as depicted on the plot. / SURVEY FOR: Jeff Foley and Sharon 120 S.W. 194th Normandy Pork, Vy SCHROETER %LAND SURVEYING . PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 813, Seehurst, voshington 98062 (206) 242 - 6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 DWN. BY _ LAW DATE 12/6/06 DATE FIELD 6/15/06 JOB NO. 490 / 1 !6. PROJECT N0. 06143 Sp CHKD. BY REVISED: 5/4/07 SCALE SHEET 1 OF 3 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE, NO. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOT 1 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36' EAST 254.81 FEET TO THE TRUE' POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH. 87'04'36" EAST 111.27 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 78.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86'21'32" WEST 111.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08'30'34" WEST 79.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH UTIUTIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. LOT 2 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST UNE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 87'04'36 EAST 239.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST 79.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86'21'32" WEST 253.26 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SAID WEST 408.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'30'54" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 82.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ACCESS AND UTIUTIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. AND TOGETHER WITH UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. LOT 3 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST UNE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST UNE, 82.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST 292.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04'23'15" EAST 126.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTH 280 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 87'48'48" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 304.35 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 95.49 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS AND UTIUTIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. • AND TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO A UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of 20 of M in book, of at page at the request of , Mgr. Supt. of Records PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONT.) LOT 4 NO. LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I �C cj - c{ cJt"/,- e . , registered as a land surveyor by the State: of Washington, certify that this plot . is based on an actual • survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under. my supervision; that the 'distances, courses and angles are -shown thereon correctly, and that monuments. other than those monuments • approved ate; hove been set and lot corn nd•as depicted on the plat. k THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE,SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST /4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54 EAST, ALONG SAID EAST UNE, 82.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST 292.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 86'21'32 EAST 71.85 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 132.99 FEET TO THE THE SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTH 280 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 87'48'48" WEST. ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE, 82.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04'23'15" WEST 126.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT IF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS AND UT1UTIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. • AND TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO A UTIUTIES EASEMENT RECORDING EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AND UTIUTIES RECORDING 110. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48' WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST UNE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION '15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54' EAST, ALONG SAID EAST UNE, 82.61. FEET; THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST 204.94 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 03'38'28 "• EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST 58.00 FEET TO A POINT OF. CURVATURE;. THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET, AND ARC OF 31.22 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT.. WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 15.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST 60:23 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 20.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8621'32" WEST 43.54 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 31.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04'23'15" EAST 54.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85'36'45" WEST 20.00 FEET' THENCE NORTH 04'23'15" WEST 71.79 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 31.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86'21'32" WEST 58.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03'38'28" WEST 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. NEW 10 FOOT UTILITY. EASEMENT RECORDING NO. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE 'NORTHWEST CORNER OF. THE SOUTHEAST 1/4.OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST; ALONG-THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4; 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH 1S NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 - FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH :UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD 'NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106:00 FEET; THENCE NORTH '87'04'36' EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID . EAST ;LINE; 82.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST '204.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03'38'28 •WEST 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 03'38'28" 'WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8621'32" EAST 70.00 FEET TO A POINT IF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A'CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 29.15 'FEET TO A .POINT. IF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO .THE LEFT 'WITH A RADIUS 'OF 10.00 FEET, AN 'ARC OF 5.91 FEET; .THENCE NORTH 86'21'32" EAST 55.45. FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH.; 'THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 17.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86'21'32' WEST 60.23 FEET TO A POINT •IF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 15.43 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH 'A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 31.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86'21'32" WEST 58.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF' BEGINNING. SURVEY FOR: Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 120 S.W. 194th St. Normandy Pork, Wa RECORDING NO. DWN. BY LAW CWKD. ' BY revised 8/5/06 VOL. /PAGE PORTION OF SE S E_1 /4 of _ - __1 /4, S._15 _ T. 23 N., R. 4 _E., W.M. SCHROETER OLAND SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 813, Seahunst, Washington 98062.(206) 242 -6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 DATE 12/6/06 DATE FlEL0 6/15/06 SCALE JOB NO. 490/18 PROJECT NO. 06143sp SHEET 2 OF 3 I CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. L.i m L o ) O M � OC CV a c O cn V) • o `o \ a) 0 c d � a ()) Northwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 15, T23N, R4E, W.M. (Point of Beginning New Legal Descriptions) 0.20' south & 0.13' east of talc. position. N87'04'36 "E (R f. 109(11) N87'04'51 "E (DEED) 366.08' (Ref. ROS 109/11) Found rebar w /cop #1765 0.07' south & 0.03' east of talc. position. 9.0' New utility easement - 1- � N8671'32 "E J 111.14' FRoN -r New 20' access on d r utilities easement 370.57' (Deed NOTE: THIS SURVEY IS A RETRACEMENT OF RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9605029001, VOL. 109/11. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of 20 at M i book of at page at the request of - .i'� VC-7. Mgr. Supt. of Records North line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Sec. 15, T23N, R4E, W.M. 0) 15.70 N 87'04' 36 "E Ref. ROS 109/11 Found rebar w /cap #15023 0.05' south & 0.15' east of calc. position. LOT 1 Area W /EASEMENT = 8,734 s.f. +/- Area W/O EASEMENT = 8,451 s.f. +/- LOT 2 Area W /EASEMENT = 19,886 s.f. +/- Area W/O EASEMENT = 19,407 s.f. +/- LOT 3 Area = W /EASEMENT = 32,962 s.f. +/- Area = W/O EASEMENT = 31,157 s.f. +/- LOT 4 Area = W /EASEMENT = 9,964 s.f. +/- Area = W/O EASEMENT = 7,236 s.f. +/- Access and Utilities Easement = 4,800 s.f. +/- LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE t, , h u v r/ tic h , registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that this plat is based on an actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown thereon correctly, and that monuments other- than those monuments approved for setting at a later dote, have been set and lot corners stoked on the ground os depicted on the plat. 4 Held 304.35' S87'48'48 "E (Ref. ROS 109/11) SURVEY FOR: Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann • 120 S.W. 194th St. Normandy Pork, Wa RECORDING N0. SCALE: 1 inch 30 ft 111111 I I I - t 0 30' 60' PORTION OF __1 of SE_1 /4, s._15_ T.23 N., R. 4 W.M. Point of Beginning (Original Deed) DWN. BY LAW CHKD. BY REVISED 5/4/07 Found rebar w /cap #17659 marked "line _J point" (Ref. ROS 109/11) (Note: Existing fire hydrant 190' +/- south of Southeast corner full parcel) VOL. /PAGE 41.01 1 N co In 1 o • 0. n CA a O ▪ C 0 u N N rn� c c to 2 Lu p 00 N 0 0 LA m 73 • I 73 73 0 DATE 12/6/06 DATE FIELD 6/15/06 SCALE 1 " =30' i Found pk nail (Ref. ROS 109/11) SCHROETEROLAND SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 813, Seahurst, Washington 98062 (206) 242 -6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 JOB NO. 490/18 PROJECT NO. 06145SQ SHEET 3 OF f October 17, 2008 Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59t Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same City of Tukwila Planning Department Attn: Rebecca Fox Dear Ms. Fox: • • Subject: Conceptual On -Site Driveway Layout for Lot 4, Jeff Foley /Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road S., Tukwila, WA Attached is a scale sketch showing the conceptual on -site driveway for two vehicles for Lot 4 of the above short plat, as well as the contiguous interior garage area. The actual driveway, which will be constructed in the future at the time of the residential building permit, may vary from the location shown, and may indeed be located on the arm of the turnaround tee. Based on experience, the driveway and garage area of the future residence will be designed and built at the elevation of the lower floor of the residence, at the daylight basement level. Detailed plans for this will only be available at the time of residential construction. The concept is essentially the same as shown on the last edition of the plans, dated January 18, 2008. Questions relating to the above may be made directly to this office. Sincerely, u . MacVeigh .E. Civil Engineer (7 G C7 `Do foley07 /0619 RECEIVED OCT 17 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 162 � � . to API. Ley r,P �g� f ik 0 1 x A L o r •¢ P• � X 16�' �• �ONLEPT!!/9L P l�.e /v� w�o y 1 � � �6 �. ' "'A � 161 � - 191 ! F RECEWE PAIN 2008 comma I Y DEVELOPMENT ti l `T'1 A 1, 1 April 25, 2008 Golder Associates Inc. 18300 NE Union Hill Road, Suite 200 Redmond, WA USA 98052 -3333 Telephone (425) 883 -0777 Fax (425) 882 -5498 www.golder.com RE/MAX Eastside Brokers 11555 SE 8 Street, Suite 200 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attention: Mr. Jeff Foley. RE: GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF REVISED REPORT 14011 MACADAM ROAD SOUTH SHORT PLAT TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Foley, Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) provided a review of the following documents for this project: "Geotechnical Evaluation for Proposed 4 -Lot Single Family Residential Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road South, Tukwila, Washington," dated April 6, 2008 by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Plans: The revised report addresses our comments satisfactorily. 042508j1h2_Revised Foley Review n[cir'cc "I. .I, r.. - a....a -- ..___. Golder Associates Our Ref.: 083 - 93237.000 "Site Improvement Plan, Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road S., Tukwila, WA 98168" dated January 18, 2008 by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. — Civil Engineer. "Steep Slope Mapping" dated April 8, 2008 by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. — Civil Engineer. Our review comments were summarized in a letter dated April 22, 2008. In response to our comments, the geotechnical engineer issued a revised geotechnical report: "Geotechnical Evaluation for Proposed 4 -Lot Single Family Residential Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road South, Tukwila, Washington," dated April 6, 2008 /revised April 23, 2008 by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. RECEIVED APR 3 0 2009 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS RE MAX Eastside Brokers, Inc Mr. Jeff Foley JLH/RDL /jbh 042508j1b2 Revised Foley Review -2- If you have any questions about our comments, please give contact us at (425) 883 -0777. Sincerely, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. Jo ua L. Hanson, P.E. -Ri 'hard D. Luark, P.E., L.E.G. Senior Project Engineer Golder Associates Senior Consultant April 25, 2008 083 -93237 April 6, 2008/Revis Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation for Proposed 4 -Lot Single Family Residential Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road S., Tukwila, WA (Jeff Foley) General: • • Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same The purpose of this report is to evaluate the soils on the above property for general construction considerations, for stability of existing steep slopes on the site and for erosion characteristics. The parcel is approximately 71,180 square feet or 1.68 acres, with an existing one story wood frame residence, driveway and surrounding lawn with landscaping shrubs and small trees. The existing house is approximately 80 to 90 years old, and will be retained. In addition, a fairly large old wood frame barn and associated graveled parking area exist on the site. The barn will also be retained and remodeled as a new residence. The lot is bordered on all sides by single family residences, some with larger parcels. It is located on the west side of Macadam Road S. in Tukwila, WA. The street address of the existing residence is 14011 Macadam Road S. The existing lot is roughly rectangular, varying from approximately 178 feet to 213 feet north -south and varying from approximately 366 feet to 386 feet east -west. The site slopes significantly downward to the east and Macadam Road S., with the western one- third being wooded with slopes of typically 2:1, with the eastern two- thirds being a cleared series of graveled parking areas, buildings and lawned yard areas, and some localized steep slopes. Based on the soils available in the lower elevations of the site (see Logs #4, 5 and 6), the site appears suitable for on -site infiltration. A common main trench will be used for all impervious areas on site, including new residences. Based on the topography of the site, significant earthwork will be required to create the new access road into the site from Macadam Road S. The existing residence and barn will be retained for continued use. The existing graveled driveway and parking areas will be displaced for the new access road and residences. Site Geology Information - Topographic Data: 1 A field survey topographic mapping of the site has been prepared by Schroeter Land Surveying in support of the proposed short plat. A copy of this map is provided, with areas of different slope categories indicated. Please note that the lot lines shown have since been slightly revised. A copy of the most recent lot layout with preliminary improvements is also provided, with currently proposed lot lines. Reduced and full size copies of each are provided with this evaluation. Site Geology Information - Subsurface Data: • The source of information to evaluate subsurface soil information was a series of six soil logs and observations of cut banks on the site. They were located in probable areas of development, although one log was located some distance up the upper vegetated slope area. A copy of the soil logs is provided with site sketch. Soils indicated a fairly typical Alderwood association, with the outwash from the upper slope area forming a deeper layer of the foams in the lower portion of the site. The logs from the upper slope and immediately below it in the table area immediately below it reflect typically an upper layer of loam with cobbles in the upper two to eight feet, underlain by a mottled sandy clay. The soils in the lower portion of the site, from the lower edge of the table, indicated the foams to depths of up to eight feet, with no observed clay. The water table indicator noted in the logs is the mottling of the clay layers encountered. The logs were prepared during summer months and no active groundwater was encountered at that time. A perching of groundwater occurs within approximately six to eight feet from the base of the upper slope. It appears that a thin sandy loam layer exists at this level, although specific vertical limits could not be identified due to the general mixing of the surface foams at this level of the slope. During previous use of the site this water was intercepted along the base of the upper slope and directed south to a minor ravine running east on the neighboring property (which is undeveloped in that area). Along with the construction of the interception ditch, a portion of the upper slope immediately adjacent to the table area, was cut back for a distance of approximately fifteen feet to enlarge the table area and allow construction of the barn which is still located in that area. It is estimated that the construction of the ditch and barn occurred approximately 70 or 80 years ago, and with the ditch being maintained for most of that period (likely the lifetime of the owner who created it). It was observed that this cut has sloughed into the old interception ditch over the last 20 or 30 years and blocked it, allowing the formation of the "wetland" areas identified at the base of the upper slope, and especially at the rear of the barn. Collection and disposal of the perched water is an aspect of the proposed drainage measures for the future use of the site. Site Geology Information - Site History: 2 • • The site reflects the general north -south glacier carving of Puget Sound region macro - topography evident in Puget Sound, the Duwanish Valley, the Kent Valley, Lake Washington, etc. The Alderwood association, of which this appears to conform, is based on the general shaping of previous soils by glacier, with the loamy overlying layer generated by weathering or final glacial outwash from the last ice age, approximately 10,000 to 12,000 years ago. The underlying clay layer is likely relatively deep, as has been encountered in other evaluations in this area throughout the Tukwila/Duwanish Valley area, down basically to sea level (or the valley floor just above sea level). The topography of the major upper slope observed during site visits indicates no evidence of catastrophic slope failure in any area. Long term very slow surface movement has probably occurred historically along the steep slope, but has been un- noticed in its rural uses. Significant movement of the surface soils down the slope, especially in an undeveloped condition, would be measured in decades. No areas of obvious surface erosion or tell tale exposed surface soils were observed, except for some minor areas along the minor drop slope. A specific indicator was observed which supports the above very slow movement of the soils. Except immediately adjacent to the minor base of slope cuts mentioned above for the ditch and barn, there were no "curved trees" indicating surface movement. In the immediate area of the old cut bank by the barn, approximately six or seven trees varying from about six to 16 inches in diameter were observed. The old cut bank was about six feet high and the cut about 15 feet into the hillside, probably cut vertically. The age of the larger trees affected indicate the age of the cut (mentioned above). All trees affected were within about ten or so feet from the top of the old cut. It is the restricted limits of the affected trees, combined with the relatively long term of exposure to the distinct cut bank, which provides actual evidence of inherent surface soil stability. This stability is provided by the geometry of the undisturbed slope, and the inherent strength of the undisturbed loams at the surface. Site Geology Information - Seismic Hazard: Seismic hazards for slopes may be comprised of either general soil saturation or classic seismic liquefaction. With general saturation, failure occurs in either a direct diagonal slippage (shear failure) or at a saturated layer of loose silts which semi - liquefy and "pour" out of their original location in the hillside. The soils of this area do not appear susceptible to this mode of failure due to the generally dense impervious nature of the soils and positive slopes which prevent surcharged saturation. While the above cause of hillside failure is not limited to seismic movement, a seismic event could possibly trigger a failure which would not otherwise have occurred, however this is unlikely. As noted above, there is no indication on the site of this mode of failure occurring previously on this site or in the surrounding area. Based on the above, the possibility of hillside failure by this mode of seismic failure is low. The second mode of failure is caused by a water saturation of a uniformly graded larger grained non - cohesive soil, which in this condition is subject to seismic movement. For 3 • • the slope areas in question, the possibility of full saturation of any layer is not present. In addition, the soils as noted are not of the type allowing this type of movement. The possibility of seismic movement is, of course, more significant with a sloping site, however, the possibility of seismic liquefaction failure for this hillside is negligible. Based on the soils underlying future construction locations for the site, including residential and road construction, the potential for seismic liquefaction settlement is very low. No special mitigation measures are recommended for construction on this site to mitigate seismic liquefaction. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Slope Stability Studies and Opinions of Slope Stability: No previous slope stability studies are known to have been prepared for this site. As noted above, the site appears stable and not subject to long term erosion or catastrophic failure. Reference slope stability, it is the opinion of this office, based on considerations discussed above, that the existing slopes are geologically stable for the intended use. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Proposed Angles of Cut and Fill Slopes and Site Grading Requirements: Significant earthwork will be required to construct the access road for this site, and moderate to light earthwork as part of the new house construction. The following are provided for general information. It is recommended that the footing bases for the new residences be placed at or below a 2:1 slope from adjacent downhill slopes. Due to the stability of the upper slope area, and the slow rate of surface soil movement, it is recommended as a convenience to avoid having to clear the minor surface soils reaching the house site, that a setback of 15 feet from the natural bottom of slope be maintained for new structures. In the area of the old cut slope area adjacent to the existing barn, a formal minor wall approximately six feet high may be desirable. The determination to construct this wall would be based on future guidance in the wetland report for the site and the specific use of that lot determined at the time of residential permitting. During temporary excavations for basements and foundations, a vertical cut face is acceptable. For deeper excavations, with potential cuts up to eight or ten feet in depth, it is recommended that cuts be backsloped at 1:1 or flatter at depths of more than four feet, per standard practice. Long term permanent cuts and fills involving native soils should be at a maximum of 2:1 unless otherwise approved by a licensed engineer familiar with the site. Site grading 4 • • should follow standard practice as regards erosion control, stockpiling of soils, and minimizing the areas to be cleared and disturbed to that necessary for approved construction. Significant structural fill should not be required for the proposed new residences. Should it be required, the following guidelines should be followed. Cut horizontal steps into the slope (for fills over 3 feet total), place non -clay materials in maximum 6" lifts, and mechanically compact to 95 percent. Note that for non - structural fill in yard areas, the 6" lifts and mechanical compaction may be omitted, although some settling will occur over time. Revegetation of finished slope areas should follow good landscaping practice. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Structural Foundation Requirements and Estimated Foundation Settlement: A foundation bearing pressure of 2,000 PSF is suitable for undisturbed soils for this site. All foundations should be placed on undisturbed soils a minimum of 18" below finished grade. All foundations should be placed at a 2:1 backslope or farther from the toe of any slope. Areas found to have unengineered old fill during construction should be evaluated prior to placement of foundations or roads /driveways in those areas. Based on observed soils, a lateral resistance factor of 0.40 for lateral loading may be safely used for design of structural retaining walls and, where used, basement walls. Note that the basement floors will be cast concrete and will provide additional long term lateral resistance to movement of the walls and their footings. It is recommended that the inside of the basement wall footings be backfilled against prior to exterior backfilling as a good general construction practice. This backfilling may be omitted in shallow crawl space foundations. Based on experience with similar soils used for wood frame residential construction, a settlement of less that 1/4 inch would be expected within a 50 foot length of foundation. It should be noted that during the site visit by this office, the existing concrete foundations for the existing house and barn, which have been in place for up to 70 to 80 years, showed very little settlement. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Soil Compaction Criteria: Loan soils on site are suitable for all structural fill in a dry or damp condition. Clay soils on site are suitable only for shallow structural backfill, which would be characterized as one foot or less. Deeper fills, if required, may use an imported select granular pit run. Compaction in foundation and vehicular traffic areas for all acceptable soils should be to 95 %, uniformly and mechanically compacted. The need for structural backfill for this site, except in utility trenching, is minimal As indicated above, backfilling of minor trenches with existing loam material is acceptable, provided it is mechanically compacted in 6 inch lifts, and that it is done in only damp or dry weather. Questions relating to the adequacy of compacted material should be evaluated by a licensed engineer inspection on site. 5 • • Geotechnical Engineering Information - Proposed Surface and Subsurface Drainage: Surface runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected and routed a common on -site infiltration system, with overflow to the adjacent street drainage system. All foundations and retaining walls will be protected by piped footing drains which lead to the common infiltration trench. Subsurface investigation indicates infiltration into the deep loam soils in the lower portion of the site is feasible. Due to the depth of the proposed infiltration trench, information about soils in that level need to be investigated once the cuts for the access road have been made. It is recommended that the soils accessible at that time be evaluated in detail and that the design of the common infiltration trench, both its design factors and layout, be fine -tuned at that time, as necessary. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Proposed Use of On Site Sewage System(s) This site is served by public sewer and does not require the use of OSS systems (drainfields). Geotechnical Engineering Information - Lateral Earth Pressures: Due to the dense nature of the in place soils, an active design lateral pressure for retaining walls of 35 PCF is suitable, with an at rest lateral pressure for foundation walls of 60 PCF recommended. All walls over 4 feet in total height must be designed by a licensed engineer and use the 1.5 safety factor per accepted practice. All walls with either a soil or vehicular traffic surcharge will require consideration of the surcharge, to be determined as part of the specific wall design. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Vulnerability of Site to Erosion: Undisturbed bare soils on site are moderately subject to erosion. Disturbed soils are subject to significant erosion. Disturbed soils on or near the slope areas are subject to heavy erosion. For the above reasons the exposure of disturbed soils on or near the slope areas should be protected with straw or tarping if left exposed for more than one week during the wet season. All disturbed areas must have properly installed silt fencing on their downhill side. A standard stabilized rock construction entrance will be used on site to prevent mud and silt from the site entering the street drainage system. With the use of erosion control measures, as mentioned above, the proposed construction should be able to take place without significant erosion to the site, or the transporting of silts off site. 6 • • Geotechnical Engineering Information - Suitability of On -Site Soils for Use as Fill: The native loam materials on -site are suitable for structural fill in damp or dry weather, with mechanical compaction required in structural fill areas, as noted above. Note minor quantities of clay in the existing soils prevents their use for deep structural fills over one foot deep. Clay soils may be used for non - structural fill, with the understanding that long term settling may occur proportional to the depth of the fill. This may be evaluated on a case by case basis during construction. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Laboratory Data and Soil Index Properties: Field testing was done of soil samples encountered. Used were both wet and dry techniques. The soils were found to be a dense medium loam and dense sandy mottled clays, in the areas and depths indicated above. Formal laboratory testing of soil samples was not deemed necessary for the evaluation of site soils for this site and type of construction. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Building Limitations: The construction of the above new residences may take place during wet weather provided the above specified erosion control measures are strictly employed. Arbitrary wet weather restrictions based on specific dates for this site and its development are not recommended. Providing the above recommendations and construction criteria are adhered to in the design and placement of the residential structure and related site work, no site related building limitations are recommended for these sites. Note that dewatering procedures may be required for deep excavations adjacent to the bottom of the upper steep slope area. Summery: The site is suitable for conventional residential construction. Drainage of impervious surfaces, including roof and driveways must be collected, infiltrated on -site in a common infiltration trench, with overflow to the adjacent street system. Statement of Risk: (Intended to comply with TMC Risk Statement Requirements) 7 While the general slope of the site is typically about 10 percent in the construction areas, some significant areas will have slopes up to 20 percent, with an existing cut area on site at 1:1. The total difference in elevation of these construction areas is up to 30 or 40 feet. The steep upper slope is vegetated and is not projected for disturbance. The level of projected disturbance, combined with the stable soils noted above, indicate that the site, and the surrounding properties (which are all similar), is not by definition a "geologic hazard" area and that additional studies and construction restrictions relating to geologic hazard areas do not apply to this project. In addition, the construction as proposed is so minor as to not pose a threat to public health, safety and welfare. The construction may occur with no greater threat to the site or to adjacent properties than if the site were level. In summery, the plans and specifications submitted for the proposed access road construction and general specifics of proposed new residences have been reviewed and conform to the conditions and recommendations in this evaluation, specifics noted above, and provided that the conditions and recommendations are satisfied, the construction and development will not increase the potential for soil movement; and the risk of damage to the proposed development, and from the development to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal (a very low possibility of risk). Questions relating to this report and to site related problems which may arise during construction of the new residences may be directed to this office. Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer • • 23�P foleygeo /0619 8 April 6, 2008 General: • • Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation for Proposed 4 -Lot Single Family Residential Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road S., Tukwila, WA (Jeff Foley) The purpose of this report is to evaluate the soils on the above property for general construction considerations, for stability of existing steep slopes on the site and for erosion characteristics. The parcel is approximately 71,180 square feet or 1.68 acres, with an existing one story wood frame residence, driveway and surrounding lawn with landscaping shrubs and small trees. The existing house is approximately 80 to 90 years old, and will be retained. In addition, a fairly large old wood frame barn and associated graveled parking area exist on the site. The barn will also be retained and remodeled as a new residence. The lot is bordered on all sides by single family residences, some with larger parcels. It is located on the west side of Macadam Road S. in Tukwila, WA. The street address of the existing residence is 14011 Macadam Road S. The existing lot is roughly rectangular, varying from approximately 178 feet to 213 feet north -south and varying from approximately 366 feet to 386 feet east -west. The site slopes significantly downward to the east and Macadam Road S., with the western one- third being wooded with slopes of typically 2:1, with the eastern two- thirds being a cleared series of graveled parking areas, buildings and lawned yard areas, and some localized steep slopes. Based on the soils available in the lower elevations of the site (see Logs #4, 5 and 6), the site appears suitable for on -site infiltration. A common main trench will be used for all impervious areas on site, including new residences. Based on the topography of the site, significant earthwork will be required to create the new access road into the site from Macadam Road S. The existing residence and barn will be retained for continued use. The existing graveled driveway and parking areas will be displaced for the new access road and residences. Site Geology Information - Topographic Data: RECEIVED APR 1 0 . 1008 cohpn�ua ry DE nitafT Site Geology Information - Subsurface Data: • • A field survey topographic mapping of the site has been prepared by Schroeter Land Surveying in support of the proposed short plat. A copy of this map is provided, with areas of different slope categories indicated. Please note that the lot lines shown have since been slightly revised. A copy of the most recent lot layout with preliminary improvements is also provided, with currently proposed lot lines. Reduced and full size copies of each are provided with this evaluation. The source of information to evaluate subsurface soil information was a series of six soil logs and observations of cut banks on the site. They were located in probable areas of development, although one log was located some distance up the upper vegetated slope area. A copy of the soil logs is provided with site sketch. Soils indicated a fairly typical Alderwood association, with the outwash from the upper slope area forming a deeper layer of the loams in the lower portion of the site. The logs from the upper slope and immediately below it in the table area immediately below it reflect typically an upper layer of loam with cobbles in the upper two to eight feet, underlain by a mottled sandy clay. The soils in the lower portion of the site, from the lower edge of the table, indicated the loams to depths of up to eight feet, with no observed clay. The water table indicator noted in the logs is the mottling of the clay layers encountered. The logs were prepared during summer months and no active groundwater was encountered at that time. A perching of groundwater occurs within approximately six to eight feet from the base of the upper slope. It appears that a thin sandy loam layer exists at this level, although specific vertical limits could not be identified due to the general mixing of the surface loams at this level of the slope. During previous use of the site this water was intercepted along the base of the upper slope and directed south to a minor ravine running east on the neighboring property (which is undeveloped in that area). Along with the construction of the interception ditch, a portion of the upper slope immediately adjacent to the table area, was cut back for a distance of approximately fifteen feet to enlarge the table area and allow construction of the barn which is still located in that area. It is estimated that the construction of the ditch and barn occurred approximately 70 or 80 years ago, and with the ditch being maintained for most of that period (likely the lifetime of the owner who created it). It was observed that this cut has sloughed into the old interception ditch over the last 20 or 30 years and blocked it, allowing the formation of the "wetland" areas identified at the base of the upper slope, and especially at the rear of the barn. Collection and disposal of the perched water is an aspect of the proposed drainage measures for the future use of the site. Site Geology Information - Site History: RECEIVED APR 10 2008 coUviUN'PI DEVELOPAPENT The site reflects the general north -south glacier carving of Puget Sound region macro - topography evident in Puget Sound, the Duwanish Valley, the Kent Valley, Lake Washington, etc. The Alderwood association, of which this appears to conform, is based on the general shaping of previous soils by glacier, with the loamy overlying layer generated by weathering or final glacial outwash from the last ice age, approximately 10,000 to 12,000 years ago. The underlying clay layer is likely relatively deep, as has been encountered in other evaluations in this area throughout the Tukwila/Duwanish Valley area, down basically to sea level (or the valley floor just above sea level). The topography of the major upper slope observed during site visits indicates no evidence of catastrophic slope failure in any area. Long term very slow surface movement has probably occurred historically along the steep slope, but has been un- noticed in its rural uses. Significant movement of the surface soils down the slope, especially in an undeveloped condition, would be measured in decades. No areas of obvious surface erosion or tell tale exposed surface soils were observed, except for some minor areas along the minor drop slope. A specific indicator was observed which supports the above very slow movement of the soils. Except immediately adjacent to the minor base of slope cuts mentioned above for the ditch and barn, there were no "curved trees" indicating surface movement. In the immediate area of the old cut bank by the barn, approximately six or seven trees varying from about six to 16 inches in diameter were observed. The old cut bank was about six feet high and the cut about 15 feet into the hillside, probably cut vertically. The age of the larger trees affected indicate the age of the cut (mentioned above). All trees affected were within about ten or so feet from the top of the old cut. It is the restricted limits of the affected trees, combined with the relatively long term of exposure to the distinct cut bank, which provides actual evidence of inherent surface soil stability. This stability is provided by the geometry of the undisturbed slope, and the inherent strength of the undisturbed loamy at the surface. Site Geology Information - Seismic Hazard: • • Seismic hazards for slopes may be comprised of either general soil saturation or classic seismic liquefaction. With general saturation, failure occurs in either a direct diagonal slippage (shear failure) or at a saturated layer of loose silts which semi - liquefy and "pour" out of their original location in the hillside. The soils of this area do not appear susceptible to this mode of failure due to the generally dense impervious nature of the soils and positive slopes which prevent surcharged saturation. While the above cause of hillside failure is not limited to seismic movement, a seismic event could possibly trigger a failure which would not otherwise have occurred, however this is unlikely. As noted above, there is no indication on the site of this mode of failure occurring previously on this site or in the surrounding area. Based on the above, the possibility of hillside failure by this mode of seismic failure is low. The second mode of failure is caused by a water saturation of a uniformly graded larger grained non - cohesive soil, which in this condition is subject to seismic movement. For 3 the slope areas in question, the possibility of full saturation of any layer is not present. In addition, the soils as noted are not of the type allowing this type of movement. The possibility of seismic movement is, of course, more significant with a sloping site, however, the possibility of seismic liquefaction failure for this hillside is negligible. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Slope Stability Studies and Opinions of Slope Stability: No previous slope stability studies are known to have been prepared for this site. As noted above, the site appears stable and not subject to long term erosion or catastrophic failure. Reference slope stability, it is the opinion of this office, based on considerations discussed above, that the existing slopes are geologically stable for the intended use. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Proposed Angles of Cut and Fill Slopes and Site Grading Requirements: Significant earthwork will be required to construct the access road for this site, and moderate to light earthwork as part of the new house construction. The following are provided for general information. It is recommended that the footing bases for the new residences be placed at or below a 2:1 slope from adjacent downhill slopes. Due to the stability of the upper slope area, and the slow rate of surface soil movement, it is recommended as a convenience to avoid having to clear the minor surface soils reaching the house site, that a setback of 15 feet from the natural bottom of slope be maintained for new structures. In the area of the old cut slope area adjacent to the existing barn, a formal minor wall approximately six feet high may be desirable. The determination to construct this wall would be based on future guidance in the wetland report for the site and the specific use of that lot determined at the time of residential permitting. During temporary excavations for basements and foundations, a vertical cut face is acceptable. Long term permanent cuts and fills involving native soils should be at a maximum of 2:1 unless otherwise approved by a licensed engineer familiar with the site. Site grading should follow standard practice as regards erosion control, stockpiling of soils, and minimizing the areas to be cleared and disturbed to that necessary for approved construction. Significant structural fill should not be required for the proposed new residences. Should ® o F it be required, the following guidelines should be followed. Cut horizontal steps into the Ldp ° slope (for fills over 3 feet total), place non -clay materials in maximum 6" lifts, and a' o E: mechanically compact to 95 percent. Note that for non - structural fill in yard areas, the 6" Ll1 ``-' 2c L 0_ v 4 O Q • • lifts and mechanical compaction may be omitted, although some settling will occur over time. Revegetation of finished slope areas should follow good landscaping practice. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Structural Foundation Requirements and Estimated Foundation Settlement: A foundation bearing pressure of 2,000 PSF is suitable for undisturbed soils for this site. All foundations should be placed on undisturbed soils a minimum of 18" below finished grade. All foundations should be placed at a 2:1 backslope or farther from the toe of any slope. Areas found to have unengineered old fill during construction should be evaluated prior to placement of foundations or roads /driveways in those areas. Based on observed soils, a lateral resistance factor of 0.40 for lateral loading may be safely used for design of structural retaining walls and, where used, basement walls. Note that the basement floors will be cast concrete and will provide additional long term lateral resistance to movement of the walls and their footings. It is recommended that the inside of the basement wall footings be backfilled against prior to exterior backfilling as a good general construction practice. This backfilling may be omitted in shallow crawl space foundations. Based on experience with similar soils used for wood frame residential construction, a settlement of less that 1/4 inch would be expected within a 50 foot length of foundation. It should be noted that during the site visit by this office, the existing concrete foundations for the existing house and barn, which have been in place for up to 70 to 80 years, showed very little settlement. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Soil Compaction Criteria: Loannsoils on site are suitable for all structural fill in a dry or damp condition. Clay soils on site are suitable only for shallow structural backfill, which would be characterized as one foot or less. Deeper fills, if required, may use an imported select granular pit run. Compaction in foundation and vehicular traffic areas for all acceptable soils should be to 95 %, uniformly and mechanically compacted. The need for structural backfill for this site, except in utility trenching, is minimal. As indicated above, backfilling of minor trenches with existing loam material is acceptable, provided it is mechanically compacted in 6 inch lifts, and that it is done in only damp or dry weather. Questions relating to the adequacy of compacted material should be evaluated by a licensed engineer inspection on site. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Proposed Surface and Subsurface Drainage: Surface runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected and routed a common on -site infiltration system, with overflow to the adjacent street drainage system. All foundations 5 • • and retaining walls will be protected by piped footing drains which lead to the common infiltration trench. Subsurface investigation indicates infiltration into the deep loam soils in the lower portion of the site is feasible. Due to the depth of the proposed infiltration trench, information about soils in that level need to be investigated once the cuts for the access road have been made. It is recommended that the soils accessible at that time be evaluated in detail and that the design of the common infiltration trench, both its design factors and layout, be fine -tuned at that time, as necessary. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Proposed Use of On Site Sewage System(s) This site is served by public sewer and does not require the use of OSS systems (drainfields). Geotechnical Engineering Information - Lateral Earth Pressures: Due to the dense nature of the in place soils, an active design lateral pressure for retaining walls of 35 PCF is suitable, with an at rest lateral pressure for foundation walls of 60 PCF recommended. All walls over 4 feet in total height must be designed by a licensed engineer and use the 1.5 safety factor per accepted practice. All walls with either a soil or vehicular traffic surcharge will require consideration of the surcharge, to be determined as part of the specific wall design. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Vulnerability of Site to Erosion: Undisturbed bare soils on site are moderately subject to erosion. Disturbed soils are subject to significant erosion. Disturbed soils on or near the slope areas are subject to heavy erosion. For the above reasons the exposure of disturbed soils on or near the slope areas should be protected with straw or tarping if left exposed for more than one week during the wet season. All disturbed areas must have properly installed silt fencing on their downhill side. A standard stabilized rock construction entrance will be used on site to prevent mud and silt from the site entering the street drainage system. With the use of erosion control measures, as mentioned above, the proposed construction should be able to take place without significant erosion to the site, or the transporting of silts off site. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Suitability of On -Site Soils for Use as Fill: The native loam materials on -site are suitable for structural fill in damp or dry weather, with mechanical compaction required in structural fill areas, as noted above. Note minor 6 • quantities of clay in the existing soils prevents their use for deep structural fills over one foot deep. Clay soils may be used for non - structural fill, with the understanding that long term settling may occur proportional to the depth of the fill. This may be evaluated on a case by case basis during construction. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Laboratory Data and Soil Index Properties: Field testing was done of soil samples encountered. Used were both wet and dry techniques. The soils were found to be a dense medium loam and dense sandy mottled clays, in the areas and depths indicated above. Formal laboratory testing of soil samples was not deemed necessary for the evaluation of site soils for this site and type of construction. Geotechnical Engineering Information - Building Limitations: The construction of the above new residences may take place during wet weather provided the above specified erosion control measures are strictly employed. Arbitrary wet weather restrictions based on specific dates for this site and its development are not recommended. Providing the above recommendations and construction criteria are adhered to in the design and placement of the residential structure and related site work, no site related building limitations are recommended for these sites. Note that dewatering procedures may be required for deep excavations adjacent to the bottom of the upper steep slope area. Summery: The site is suitable for conventional residential construction. Drainage of impervious surfaces, including roof and driveways must be collected, infiltrated on -site in a common infiltration trench, with overflow to the adjacent street system. Statement of Risk: (Intended to comply with TMC Risk Statement Requirements) While the general slope of the site is typically about 10 percent in the construction areas, some significant areas will have slopes up to 20 percent, with an existing cut area on site at 1:1. The total difference in elevation of these construction area's up to 30 or 40 feet. The steep upper slope is vegetated and is not projected for disturbance. The level of projected disturbance, combined with the stable soils noted above, indicate that the site, and the surrounding properties (which are all similar), is not by definition a "geologic 7 ® CO LU o cv ▪ m3 L Q u CC hazard" area and that additional studies and construction restrictions relating to geologic hazard areas do not apply to this project. In addition, the construction as proposed is so minor as to not pose a threat to public health, safety and welfare. The construction may occur with no greater threat to the site or to adjacent properties than if the site were level. In summery, the plans and specifications submitted for the proposed access road construction and general specifics of proposed new residences have been reviewed and conform to the conditions and recommendations in this evaluation, specifics noted above, and provided that the conditions and recommendations are satisfied, the construction and development will not increase the potential for soil movement; and the risk of damage to the proposed development, and from the development to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal (a very low possibility of risk). Questions relating to this report and to site related problems which may arise during construction of the new residences may be directed to this office. Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer • ,:ate O9 4p/2 `O c foleygeo /0619 CI Cal �-a a C2C 121 CA— U LU 8 ` - Found rebarglicla #14023 0.05' south 0.15' east of calc. position. SOIL LOGS • FOLEY/MANN SHORT PLAT 28 JUL 06 SL 1 0 -96" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 96- 120 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL-2 0 -84" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 84 -96 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 3 0-24" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 24 -72 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 4 0 -72 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 5 0 -96 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 6 0-48 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (OUSTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) Q8 33 m 0 iuo. LOA.) 1]aC .ALT FEwf6 , ,. MD.1G05 ' , 11 DPYIIIASUlCR0171{/.i n nn.a SW 1ffD UArzIDANM 1141ID'* SANDY CAY PID1n=) Sa3• )nDbASCLD. I D KM•r not? MCI MOILTRFD, aD 4n' pains/imam Y CLAI MI EDI um SANDY awrporllmi SD 01• 1@DDAA[IAIYM.C®n (CCM103 CCIVEVAT QI!naaaa1 nMRB) aT 09P`• - IDD) DA551DAN (ECM iNLMAY OUT OCBCas D D OU3lT MUM) OA, ICED MU LOAM 1.:0113UM _'SEC770N . G. NIM.ERAIBO'. 6ArCNGEO . 4 ti S fi A Zi !. of? Zi n!v:11 myy A.�e m a..a ix. EARTHWORK ESTIMATES CUT 1.200 CY FILL 1.500 CY (INCL TRENCH GRAVEL) b. 5-N■ M1A . 1.31.7 h { 1 2. M5(5) -1]0.0 . Inv( : ray(M) . Imo i.K1rADV3)- ]2S per 6Ywftt lNIA..NIF*. ACTIVITY. SCHEDULE: 1 STAKING BY SURVEYOR. 2 PLACE SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. 3 PERFORM ROUGH GRADING OF NEW DRIVEWAY AREA. 4 INSTALL NEW CATCH BASINS AND DRAINAGE PIPERRENCH. INSTALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AT THIS TIME. INSTALL SILT TRAP IN NEW CATCH BASINS. 5 PERFORM FINE GRADING OF NEW AND DRIVEWAY AREA. S. PAVE NEW ROAD AND DRIVEWAY AREAS. 7 REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS WI H GRASS SEED. REMOVE SILT FENCING AND CATCH BASIN SILT TRAPS ONCE VEGETATION IS REESTABLISHED. k • A .- VlC/NITY � . � MiLE /N\ /NAP 0 R° O O - ' m 2 - 1 5210115020 SURFACES GRAVEL GNVEWAT • 14150 AL •/_ 0051010 NOUSE • 1,514 of. 0/- 045122* IA. • 9e5 et 4/- SASS OF ELEVATOR: SURVEY 00511R0. DATABASE PONT 10 754 BRASS NAB. II =CRETE IN LASE - 087 FEET 50.25 WO INTERSECTIONS Or S0. 14410 ST.. 515T AVE, AND 2ACADAM RD S0. CLEVATO) • 150.100 FEET NAV030 ..w% roes . /op 117552 020 50•7•5 0.13' opt of ctl0 m /1=4 OK SLOPE 557003910 350. SCALE 1210.♦ SLOPE VOX * SL OPE Found roar . /cop 517555 0.07 .w0 a 0.03' east of ads. P0.*04. 0..< reaal . rap ae�t ea + ors. 5 +Ycmp 1bo - STEEP SCOPE /7APP /146 X rn .5.45 5,. 108 0. *44' 14YS • .SLOPE - 9- oaf Sow - 5- ..tar u. •t•'^ Ors. Imo O-.t pp.r #05* AMOR M 0040 or WW.n.e.n VINO M *Not Vmnp NAP Mn Um Na, Pane rase. M. up., a� PAY .m..p p u p Wm .. Rear umaavolop ,yD - rR4 - ICS I� We* For Apr., Au own sFo.r:A M %p .FPS.... w promo N.n DATE (HELD) 0/15/00 J09 f 490/15 0.4)0•4 5/5/07 • 3 1 k S 'RCP= SHORT RAT J.W 04ey M 5A4m, Yam 120 EN. 15431 S1. N0mc5T Pww, No Schroeter Land ® Surveying PROFESSIONAL L,WO SURVEYORS PO 80.133. A.r.t. 054•.54* 000 WOO 50-014 FA 035*45 -11A11 PATE (OPRCE) 3 /25/17 PROJET N0. 051431,520 SOLE I • 20• 015 BY 4. J SL 1 • SEC. 1 ? TWO -EL R0. • 132.0' • n22.0 L EGAL 005C10 11C NORTH 200 FEET OF RE 60111EAST 1/4 O TIC SWTNEAST 1/5 O 5EL0OK 13 00VRIS0 23 NORM, RANGE • EAST. IJL. 1TNG REST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTR =PT TN57 PORTION :MHO YTON THE 50M1NEAST 1/• OF THE 032700RSf 1/4 OF SECTION 15, 100190,5 23 NORTH, RANGE I EAST, W.N.. DESCRIBED AS 0550515: 52GMNING Al 111E INTERSECTION O INC 50.111 LINE OF COKANIIENT MDT I. IN S.0 SECTION IS. NTH THE NEST UNE O THE JAMES C.ARX COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 T THENCE NORTH 401025' %EST ALONG SAM VEST LINE 7255 FEET: THENCE SOWN metals MST 110.72 FEET TO A PANT OF CURVE: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE SUIT MITI A RADIUS OF 5352 FEET. Al ARC DISTANCE i 24.35 FEET TO THE TRUE PONT OF 500551NS O DOS 505CR0TRN: THENCE CONTINUNG A10410 SAID CO1VE. A ARC DISTANCE OF 24.51 FEET: THENCE NORTH 051753 REST 1130.57 FEET TO A PONT ON THE SLIM UNE O SAM GOVERNMENT 1DT 1, 043.1 IS NORTH 07.512' WEST 315 FEET FROM THE PONT OF BE011NIN0 THENCE SOUTH 1044 EST IDS FEET, 11001EE NORTH 57045)' EAST 157.50 FEET TO • PONT 51001 DEARS EWTH 055510' EAST FROM TIE TRUE POINT O BEON050: TENCE NLI1N 085510' VEST 81.42 FEET TO TIE TRUE PONT Of BEON43N0 OF 1435 DESCRIPTOR EXCEPT THAT POITOU 00 TIC SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF TIE 'OUTCAST 1 4 OF SAD moon 15. 0E5=0E0 AS Faun 50050.174 500INN0 A' IRE N100000I NE ON OF E SOU. UNE OF SAM GO 11DT 1, IN SAM SECTOI It sent IRE VEST LINE Of THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY R0A0 N0. 2: MENGE NORM 405502025' MST ALONG SAM WEST UNE 72.55 FEET: TCNCE SOUTH 50••825' MST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT Gf CURVE: THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE 5011 NA1T10 A RADIUS OF 5352 FEET. AN ARC INSTANCE OF 20.34 FEET: 1749.5 50115 0515 EAST I11.42 FEET: 1IFNC.NOITH 5704'01' EAST 150.0 FEET TO MP0NT ON THE M5TERLT LINE O SAM JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD, SOUTCRLT 72 FEET FROM 111E POINT Of 8EON400: THENCE 001114E1121 ALONG SAO VEST LINE 72 FEET TO TIE PORT O BEGPO101 EXCEPT BE5N4MG AT THE NOITNREST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 200 FEET O 114E 0321HEAST 4/4 O TIC 00U114EAST 1/4 O SECTION 15. 1U•JN5112 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. E0'.: THENCE SOUTH 2535'40' EAST 375.5 FEET: 1110CEE SOUR, 104 EAST 125 FEET: 110)00 NORTH 2•38'42' VEST T 4 POINT 125 FEET 5320,. OF TIC PONT OF BECi9M7 '401C NO111 125 FOOT TO 111E PONT Of BEO)LVOIL EXCEPT THE SOUTH 00 FEET O 114E NORTH 205 FEET O DC WEST 4007 FEET O SAO SOUTCAT t/A OF TIC SOUTHEAST , /4 Ot BECTON 15, IOON51v 23 NORM RACE • EAST, WL.. E0CEP1 TIE 301'5 75 FEET O 11E VEST 405.7 FEET O' SAID SECT. is 00 V. SLOPE Fe Eon S-)14 1* • 133T ( 12'AD5(5 ).30C 0d42'04(0) -130.* r 54• 12.2 {:YADS(N X314' 4+(,YApS(3�T32.S 9 \ • d 5 5outhwestedy end 24'ADS top a 137.6' GRAPHIC SCALE • (s lur) El fiENU ® Cala . #0410.nt In CO.. + 9..4..01 )( Tech In Leal e' Nc5 . OW S Orc.O. 0.9 . . O 541 . /AF. 125804 • Found D.a r.ns Et Mr*. No bmo 914. ® O.c50a• TIN • E.w4..n Tref • Cad lain • 0e. Vol• Warr Ypv. 00 ....r 112)0144 p stem than on.* •140 .GEL. m.tn - BM, UM Found rebar w /sop #17659 0.20' south & 0.13' east of calf. position. ound rebar ;Afar, #1 0.05' south & 0.15' east of talc. position. SOIL LOGS ' FOLEY/MANN SHORT PLAT 28NL06 SL l 0.96' MED DARK LOAM W/(OBBLES 96 -120^+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) 114 044' MED DARK LOAM WICOBBL ES 114-96^+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) 11.1 0.24' MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES 24 -7J'+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) 11.1 0-77+ AOID DARK (DAM W/COBBIES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SI. 2 0-96'+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBB ES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANXI D IT ON SITE) SL ¢ 0-4r+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SrIE) qt S8704'39' 366. 17;6 Z -(. NT. Rdt* RY PGR SEA77LE STD. PLAN 7i /d' /0' ( tf l ' i I I t5 Found rebar w /cap #17659 0.07 south & 0.03' east of coin. position. d +75' R - TYPE L Cf8 `) 2Vs• CL 'B'A.G. 0.Q.77c. G " MIN. 84.4OED 'ri .E /V TL .P /M = 146.8 /EG" = /30.1. (EAST) /4,40 501/7//) dB7N, Al/ TEE EAST NE 20' W A( /ESS AND 1/7/L/ TIES CAS[ P1E/v7 Found rebar w /cap marked line point on deed line x ,3,., t)b orth end 12 - cmp t�p - 130.7 K 13'3 south end 12'tp tope 131.4' ditch 66 UT /UT /ES /N COMHGN TZE EL e..171/ A7 .1 GAS ELEc. I- z W J U so 0 lat 0 t 0 0 w 0 C -1 J U / z /07L /S' W /DE UT /4/7 /ES EASEHENT . AEE.o 3 X ATE8 , E7EZ 26' A: (71 dS'GF /2' O. Z. S2 CU'L 4 (AJw7CN 6A: La /TCN F /G7 132.4' 128.0' cb flows S -N1 rim= 133.7 Inv( I141 Yep(N).130.7' • - OYE.CFLO 70 D /TCN (51.0. LEG.) . 5717 FENCE FOC.C' MNSTC FE(7RAN(E tb rim - 134.5' Inv(12'ADS(N) =132.4' inv(12'ADS(S)- 132.5' ACTIVITY SCHEDULE: 1. STAKING BY SURVEYOR. 2. PLACE SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. 3. PERFORM ROUGH GRADING OF NEW DRIVEWAY AREA. 4. INSTALL NEW CATCH BASINS AND DRAINAGE PIPE/ TRENCH. INSTALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AT THIS TIME INSTALL SILT TRAP IN NEW CATCH BASINS. 5. PERFORM FINE GRADING OF NEW AND DRIVEWAY AREA. 6. PAVE NEW ROAD AND DRIVEWAY AREAS. 7. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS WITH GRASS SEED. 8. REMOVE SILT FENC, AND CATCH BASIN SILT TRAPS ONCE VEGETATION IS REESTABLTSHEB° . i .T�4RUT THWORK 1,200 CY ESTIMATE 1,500 CY (INCL TRENCH GRAVEL) - - 'A07. 1- oe ✓x /NF /[:7.247 /4N 7RENCN- 6'b x /S:J' W ra0 t end ' top - 127.2 ' CAI /,'SS CB - 7017E L (A8 J /24. / /84" _ /34.6 (iWEJTJ /3'/. / (NO27N. - 601/71 4 EAST) end 12' cP W/ TEE WESTG/NE 131.4' GRAPHIC SCALE ro m . ( Di PEfiT ) 1 Inch - 20 ft. VICINITY MAP /".,(/* MILE RECE ADD 1 A 7002 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES GRAVEL DRIVEWAY - 10,150 s.f. +/- EXISTING HOUSE = 1,514 s.f. +/- EXISTING BARN = 966 s.f. +/- BASIS OF ELEVATION; SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE POINT ID 760; BRASS NAIL IN CONCRETE IN CASE - 0.87 FEET BELOW RIM; INTERSECTIONS OF SO. 144T1-I ST., 51ST AVE, AND MACADAM RD SO. ELEVATION = 160.180 FEET NAVDB8 Found rebar w /cap #17659 0.20' south & 0.13' east of colt. position. Found r 0.05' soot colt. posit /dap #1 023 0.15' east of 191 3 /S 40 % SLOPE /S-¢b % SLOPE S8704'39'W 366.08' O ZO' 40' 60' 80' /00' 1 ' SG ALE 4O%.t Found rebar w /cap #17659 0.07' south & 0.0S east of colt. position. 1 %t SL 2 Found rebar w /cap marked line point on deed line x north end 12'cmp t�p =130.7' south end 12'cp top = 131.4' CL ditch 04.6 i % # SLOPE h end 12'cp = 131.4' 132.4' = 128.0' l, Lc\amL utumr nvn THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING 'WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST UNE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; T THENCE NORTH 4020'25` WEST ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25' WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE I: 24.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE, A ARC DISTANCE OF 24.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8517'33" WEST 180.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOf 1, WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'32 WEST 375 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 10'44'32 EST 106 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51' EAST 197.60 FEET TO AI POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0855'10' EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 08•55'10' WEST 81.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 15, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST UNE 75 OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; THENCE NORTH 40020'25' WEST ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25' WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0855'10' EAST 81.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51' EAST 189.0 FEET TO APPOINTION THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD, SOUTHERLY 72 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'42' EAST 378.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10'44'32' EAST 125 FEES; THENCE NORTH 8956'42' WEST T A POINT 125 FEET SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 125 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 205 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SECTION. end 18'cp top = 127.2' /5" 40 %x, SLOPE cb flows S ->N rim = 133.7' inv(12' ADS(S) =130.8' Inv(12'cp(N) =130.7 cb rim = 134.5' inv(12ADS(N) =132.4' inv(12ADS(S)=132.5' B southwesterly end 24 "ADS STEEP SLOPE /MAPPING r top = 137.6' GRAPHIC SCALE ( DI FEET ) t )mb . 20 ft. LEGEND ® Concrete Monument in Case + Monument X Tack in Leod or Nail & Disk • Bronze plug O Set rebar w /cap /23604 ® Found pipe or rebar Hydrant 'n, Power pole J Deciduous Tree • Evergreen Tree ® Catch Basin Gas Valve wv ▪ Water Valve e sewer manhole ® storm drain manhole wm❑ water meter - S- sewer lin NOTE The location of utilities as shown serving the subject property have been taken From public records. We cannot certify to their accuracy and /or completeness. Before e ncbg construction Involvtg excavation or removal of existing structures, coJ locating service or 1 -800- 424 -5555 for underground utility locations. Field data for this survey was obtained by direct field measurements. Angular and linear relationships were measured with a six second theodolite and electroetc distance measuring device. supplemented by a steel tope. Contours as shown have been interpolated between spot elevations, actual ground surf cc. nny nary. This survey has been prepared for the exclusive use of parties whose 'ones appeor hereon only, and does not extend to any untamed third parties without express recertification by the land sttveyor. DATE (FIELD) 6/15/06 JOB # 490/18 Revised 6/5/07 -9- gas line - w- water line - SD-- storm droin line d--@ power pole w /light DATE (OFFICE) 3/26/07 PROJECT NO. 06143tp20 0 >• m PROPOSED SHORT PLAT Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 120 S.W. 194th St Normandy Pork, Wa RECEIVED APR 10 7BLB @ ELOP Schroeter Land ® Surveying PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS PO. Box 813. Seatwrst. Washington 98062 1206) 242-6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 SCALE 1' - 20' DWG BY low i SE 1/4 SEC. 15 TWP. 'L.i RG 4 March 3, 2008 Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S., Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same City of Tukwila Public Works Department Attn: Dave McPherson • • Subjec : Sight>Distance, Evaluation; Jeff Foley /Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat, 14011 Macadam oad'S` WA Dear Mr. McPherson: Attached is a scale sketch showing the Entering Sight Distance and the Stopping Sight Distance for the proposed entrance to the above short plat. The proposed entrance is on the west side of the roadway, which is Macadam Road S. Only horizontal distances were evaluated as the entrance and roadway is relatively level and was observed to have no restrictions based on vertical alignment. The Entering Sight Distance and the Stopping Sight Distance to right or south of the entrance were relatively unrestricted and found to be in excess of 500 feet for each type of sight distance. The Entering Sight Distance and the Stopping Sight Distance to left or north of the entrance were as follows: Entering Sight Distance 203 feet Criteria: Sight location approx. three feet above pavement, located ten feet behind fog line, approx. five feet south of driveway centerline, this simulating the observer's location. Observed location approx. three to four feet above pavement near centerline on southbound lane, this simulating the front of an oncoming vehicle. Stopping Sight Distance 208 feet Criteria: Sight location approx. three feet above pavement approx. five feet west of centerline of Macadam Road S. in southbound lane, this simulating the observer's location. Observed location three to four feet above pavement one foot outside of fog line, this simulating the front of an entering vehicle. RECEIVFD MAR 1 i ?rim PUBLIC WORKS RECEIVED MAR 0 4 2008 DEVELOPMENT Some light grass and brush was observed obscuring the line of sight to the left. This easily remove vegetation, all in the right -of -way, was considered removed in making the above measurements. The main cause for the restricted sight distance to the left is the side of road embankment. This cannot be altered significantly at this time as it would require regrading neighboring private property. In addition, an older concrete garage belonging to the neighboring property and partially built into the hillside approximately 180 feet north of the entrance would have to be removed, which would also not be feasible. Per King County Road Standards, the following are noted: Entering Sight Distance 430 feet Stopping Sight Distance 200 feet While the Entering Sight Distance standard is not met, the following mitigating information is given. The location of the driveway is such that the existing entering sight distance does not feel dangerous. This is largely due to the traffic coming around the relatively gentle but distinct curve in the road invites some natural caution. In addition, approximately one block or slightly more beyond the site to the south, is a four -way stop which provides additional preparation to stop for the southbound traffic. It is understood that the widening and upgrading of Macadam Road S., while not scheduled in the near future, is included in the long range plans for City improvements. Questions relating to the above may be made directly to this office. Since e rgly ruce S. MacVei Civil Engineer • • acPIAES: 4/24/ 0 9 foley06 /0619 k STAEDTLER® No. 937 811 E Engineer's Computation Pad Nit `k 11 N • 0 Design Speed (mph) 30 ` 35 40 45 :. 50 55 60 Horizontal Curvature for 6 percent Superelevation, Radius (Ft.) 273 380 509 656 849 1,061 1,348 Horizontal Curvature for 8 percent (maximum allowable on arterials) Superelevation, Radius (Ft.) (requires approval of the • Engineer) 250 350 465 600 760 960 1,200 . Stopping Sight Distance (Ft.) 20 250 325 400 475 550 650 Entering Sight Distance (Ft.) 430 490 555 620 685 750 810 Passing Sight Distance (Ft.) for a 2 -Lane Road 1,100 1,300 1,500 1,650 1,800 1,950 2,100 2. ( b3 Horizontal Curvature and Sight Distance Desiqn Clues A. The design values shown in Tables 2.1 and 2.2 are minimum values necessary to meet the requirements of "Sections 2.02, 2.03 and 2.04 for a selected design speed and road classification. A maximum of 8 percent superelevation may be used, upon approval of the Engineer, for design of improvements to existing arterials, as necessary, to meet terrain and right -of -way conditions. Superelevation run- off lengths on arterials, rural residential and commercial access streets shall be calculated in accordance with the WSDOT Design Manual. B. Superelevation is not required in the design of horizontal curves on urban residential access streets; however, horizontal curves must be designed based on design speed and selected cross section as indicated in Table 2.2. Table 2.2 is based on AASHTO "Low Speed Urban Streets design methodology. Superelevation may be used on urban residential streets as necessary to meet terrain and right -of -way conditions. Table 2.1 Arterial Roads. Rural Residential And Commercial Access Streets Design Values 1, Design Speed (mph) 25 35 Horizontal Curvature, for 6 Percent Superelevation, Radius (Ft.) ' 135 215 320 Horizontal Curvature, for 4 Percent Superelevation, Radius (Ft.) 145 230 . 345 Horizontal Curvature, for 2 Percent Superelevation, Radius (Ft.) 155 250 375 Horizontal Curvature, Normal Crown Section, Radius (Ft.) 180 300 460 Stopping Sight Distance (Ft.) 150 2 00 250 Entering Sight Distance (Ft.) 365 C.13-9 490 Minimum Run -Off Length (Ft.) 80 90 100 Table Urban Residential Access Streets Design Values 2.06 Private Streets A. While community street requirements are usually best served by public streets owned and maintained by the County, private streets may be appropriate for some local access streets. Usually these are minor access streets, either residential or commercial. B. Private streets may be approved only when they are: 1. Permanently established by right -of -way, tract or easement providing legal access to each affected lot, dwelling unit, or business and sufficient to accommodate required improvements, to include provision for future use by adjacent property owners when applicable; and 2. Built to King County Road Standards, as set forth herein, or secured under the provisions of K.C.C._ 19.24.040; and 3. Accessible at all times for emergency and public service vehicle use; and 4. Not obstructing, or part of, the present or future public neighborhood circulation plan developed in processes such as the King County Comprehensive Plan, applicable community plan, or Capital Improvement Program; and 5. Not going to result in land locking of present. or future parcels; and 6. Not needed as public roads to meet the minimum road spacing requirements of these Standards; and 14 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 November 27, 2007 RE: Foley Short Plat #L07 -001 Dear Mr. Foley: As we discussed with you and Sharon Mann, Tukwila staff will require additional information in order to proceed with review of your project. This letter supplements the one sent to you on November 27, 2007. We will discuss these additional comments at our meeting on Wednesday, November 28, 2007 at the City of Tukwila offices. Fire Department: 1. Provide angle of departure at drive entrance on Macadam Road 2. Provide water velocity. Water availability shows 1149 GPM, but no velocity. 3. Access road shown at 15% grade i.e. maximum allowable. Contact Fire Marshall. 4. Location of nearest hydrant? 5. Fire turnaround needed? Planning: 1. Where is access for "barn ?" There appears to be a 6' rockery/wall to the east. 2. Ditch or stream? 3. Describe railroad tie wall. Sincerely, ebecca Fox Senior Planner • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 November 27, 2007 RE: Foley Short Plat #L07 -001 Dear Mr. Foley: • As we discussed with you and Sharon Mann, Tukwila staff will require additional information in order to proceed with review of your project. Comments on the environmental review and short plat have been combined for this document. We will discuss these comments at our meeting on Wednesday, November 28, 2007 at the City of Tukwila offices. SEPA: The following comments pertain to the environmental analysis. They are based on a review of the SEPA checklist, the related letter report by David Evans and Associates (wetlands) and the reports prepared by Bruce MacVeigh (evaluation for on -site stormwater infiltration). Specific notations refer to the SEPA checklist. 1. Part A, Item 6. The checklist (attached) states that 2 new residences are proposed, but one version of the site plan shows 3 new residences. The checklist should clearly describe what the proposed project is. 2. Part A, Item 12 (mapping of environmentally sensitive sites). The City's Sensitive Areas Map shows an intermittent watercourse on the property (see also response to Item h in Part B8.h). Even though David Evans and Associates has identified two wetlands on the site, no mention is made of a possible watercourse, although one of the topographical maps shows a "swale" and a "ditch ". This issue should be addressed in the checklist and in supporting documentation. 3. Part B, Item 1.c., states that there are medium to silty loams. However, the geotechnical engineer's report also shows underlying sandy clay (this is important because it affects site hydrology). 4. Part B, Items 3a, 1 and 2. Both of these responses are incorrect, as the applicant's own wetland consultant has reported 2 wetlands on the site. It is not at all clear if the proposed project will impact wetlands (or a potential watercourse) or their buffers. Information provided to the City to date shows a house site located in "Wetland A ", which suggests that the wetland will be filled. The two -page letter report submitted by David Evans and Associates recommends a buffer reduction for this wetland, but the Rf 1 Q: \Foley Short Plat #L07 -001 \Foley -- comments #I-- 11.20.07.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 11/28/2007 • rationale for this is not explained. The David Evans letter report is insufficient as a submittal for a Sensitive Areas Study. The consultant should prepare a Sensitive Areas Study in accordance with the City's guidelines (attached). The full delineation report should be provided as part of the Sensitive Areas Study report. Once this information is received, the City's biologists will confirm wetland/watercourse boundaries in the field. It should be noted that even though David Evans and Associates states that one of the wetlands is below the size threshold for regulation by the City, the size of the wetland has to be confirmed in the field by the City's biologist. Even if the wetland ( "Wetland B ") is below the City's acreage threshold, it does not exempt the applicant from obtaining permits from the Corps of Engineers and Department of Ecology if this or the other wetland is proposed to be filled. 5. Part B, Item 3a.3. The response states that no fill material will be placed in surface water or wetlands. This appears to be contradicted by the site plan that shows the house footprints. The applicant should provide a site drawing that shows the wetlands, their buffers, and the proposed locations of houses and site infrastructure. 6. Part B., Item 3b.1. The checklist states that no groundwater will be withdrawn. However, the engineer's report recommends dewatering of the site. 7. Part B, Item 3d. The checklist states that surface runoff will be 100% infiltrated on site. However, this is contradicted by the engineer's report dated November 12, 2006 stating that infiltration is not recommended for this site. The same engineer stated in a later report (July 26, 2007) that infiltration was appropriate for the site. These inconsistencies should be explained. 8. The Geotechnical Engineering Reports, by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E., dated November 12, 2006 & July 26, 2007, shall require a peer review. The cost for this required geotechnical peer review shall be at Owner's expense. Public Works staff has requested a price quotation from Shannon & Wilson, Inc. for this service. 9. Show any required buffers on a site map per the Geotechnical Reports (s). 10. If storm drainage is not allowed to be infiltrated on -site, then a revised Storm Drainage report per '98 King County Surface Water Design Manual shall be required 11. Provide sight distance study prior to preliminary short plat approval. 12. How many residences are being proposed? Where are they located? What is proposed for the "barn"? Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions prior to our meeting. Rf 2 11/28/2007 Q: Foley Short Plat #L07- 0011Foley -- comments# 1-- 11.20.07.doc Sincerely, /Th Rebecca Fox Rf 3 11/28/2007 Q: \Foley Short Plat #L07- 001\ Foley -- comments #1-- 11.20.07.doc Rebecca Fox From: Rebecca Fox Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:46 AM To: David McPherson Subject: Foley -- Short Plat & SEPA checklist comments Attachments: Re: Short Plat SEPA checklist.txt Hi Dave, Per the attached, when can I expect comments on the Foley Short Plat (L07 -001) and SEPA (E07 -014)? Thanks. Rebecca Rebecca Fox From: jefffoleyl @aol.com Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 1:40 PM To: Rebecca Fox Subject: Re: Short Plat SEPA checklist Hi Rebecca, I checking in with you on our short plat application. I just want to know when we expect some info from you, as of today its been in your office for 10 weeks now. If there is going to be any changes we need to have our civil and wet land guy make those changes. If you can call me when you get a free moment. Thanks Jeff Foley 206 - 779 -3781 Original Message From: Rebecca Fox <rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us> To: jefffoleyl @aol.com; jefffoleyl @aol.com Sent: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 3:26 pm Subject: Short Plat SEPA checklist Jeff, It turns out that we willl need you to submit the SEPA checklist with public information materials and check at your earliest convenience so that we can continue to process your applications. You may bring these into our office, and anyone at the counter can accept the materials. Thank you. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! 1 August 15, 2007 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 Subject: Foley Short Plat L07 -001 Dear Mr. Foley: City of Tukwila • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M Mullet, Mayor Your application for a four lot short plat is considered complete on August 15, 2007 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Feel free to contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via email at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions about the review process for your application. Sincerely, = c'- Rebecca Fox Senior Planner cc. L07 -001 Rf Q:\Foley Short Plat #L07- 001\Foleycomplete.DOC 1 08/15/2007 6300 South center RnnIPVard .quite:. it1 • Takwila Wachinotnn OR1RR • Phnno. 91)/S_d21_2A7n . Gov. 9nA_A21 ?AA C August 8, 2007 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 RE: Proposed Short Plat L07 -001 Dear Mr. Foley: City of Tukwila Rf Q: \Foley Short Plat #L07- 001 \Foleyincompleteapp #2.doc NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director We have received your submittal of information dated August 1, 2007. Your application for a short plat located at 14011 Macadam Road South, Tukwila, WA is not yet complete. The Complete Application Checklist that you submitted is enclosed for your reference, as well as a copy of the letter sent to you on January 31, 2007. In order to complete the application, the following must be submitted to the permit center: a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 1 The property contains environmentally sensitive areas (stream and slopes). Prepare and provide two copies of sensitive area studies (watercourse and geotechnical reports) per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (on- line at www.ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd/dcdplan.hrm) for additional information . b. SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN 1. Plan showing the location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15 %) For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e. 100 yr. flood). Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". 2. Show all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks, tracts and protection measures 3. Show any proposed lot tract lines. 1 08/08/2007 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 C. NEW ITEM: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/REVIEW — $590 FEE REQUIRED Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. • In your submittal of August 8, 2007, you have provided additional information indicating that you anticipate cut and fill of approximately 2, 700 cubic feet. You have submitted Environmental Checklist that is required for any fill /cut above 500 cubic feet. The Environmental Checklist/Environmental Review requires a separate application and fee of $590. Please remit these funds so that we may process this application. Upon receipt of these items, City staff will re- review them for completeness. This application will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.104.070(E). If you have any questions about this request, please contact me at 206 -431 -3683 or via email at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us Sincerely, /ec 44 7 Rf 2 08/08/2007 Q: \Foley Short Plat #L07- 001 \Foleyincompleteapp #2.doc July 23, 2007 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 RE: Proposed Short Plat ( #L07 -001) -- Incomplete application Dear Mr. Foley: Cizy of Tukwila • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director On January 31, 2007 the City of Tukwila sent you a letter stating that your application for a short plat was incomplete. We indicated the items that were needed to complete the application, and stated that the application would be canceled unless the materials were provided within 90 days of the letter. In our conversation today, you've told me that you expect redrawn civil plans later this week. In light of this information, we have extended the deadline for complete application. Please provide complete application materials no later than August 13, 2007. Otherwise, it will be necessary to cancel the application. If you have questions, you may contact me at 206 -431 -3683 or via email rfox ci.tukwila.wa.us . Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Rf 1 07/23/2007 O: \Folev Short Plat #L07- 001 \extendandeadline.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC. Memorandum 0 4.; 4 4 4t. " 4 : DATE: April 9, 2007 TO: Jeff Foley FROM: Kirk Moughamer Biologist SUBJECT: Wetland and Wetland Buffer Conditions on King County Parcel # 1523049035 PROJECT: Foley Short Plat PROJECT NO.: JEF000000001 David Evans and Associates Inc. (DEA) has conducted field reconnaissance of King County parcel # 1523049035, located at 14011 Macadam Road South. The property is located in the City of Tukwila (City), King County, Washington, in Township 23 N, Range 04 E, Section 15. The site is a developed 1.68 -acre property with two existing structures ON - SITE INVESTIGATION The parcel is composed of mixed conifer /deciduous forest on the undeveloped slope to the west, and disturbed areas graded for the existing structures. The property currently contains one residential home built in the 1920s, one barn/garage, and an existing compacted gravel driveway that enters the property from the southeast corner. South of the barn is a broad flat area that was likely used for grazing livestock. Two wetlands were delineated on the property. Both wetlands occur along the toe of slope at the western edge of the developed portion of the property. These wetlands are considered palustrine scrub /shrub wetlands, with hydrology provided by seeps at the slope break. These wetlands are rarely inundated with water and are often only saturated to the surface. Hydrology on the site has been altered over time. Cuts made into the slope in order to flatten and develop the area for housing and grazing exposed subsurface flows that contribute to the hydrology of the area. The presence of hydrology, predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and the presence of hydric soils qualify these areas as wetland. Both wetlands and their buffers are disturbed due to the proximity to human activities including grazing, gravel stockpiling, existing structures and the presence of invasive species. REGULATION City Code regulates development parameters around wetlands and their buffers through Chapter 18.45. Designations, ratings, and buffers for wetlands are detailed in section 18.45.080; uses, alterations, and mitigation are outlined in section 18.45.090. Wetland A is considered a Type 3 wetland, which requires a 50 -foot buffer and a building setback of 10 feet. City Code defines a Type 3 wetland as "...those wetlands that are greater than 1,000 square feet and less than one acre in size with two or fewer wetland classes." Wetland B does not fit the description provided for a Type 3 wetland above because it is less than 1,000 square feet in size. Wetland B is approximately 250 square feet in size. City Code does not provide protections or development parameters around wetlands less than 1,000 square feet. OveP— Jeff Foley April 9, 2007 Page 2 Enclosures: none KM:pm p: \j \jefo00000001 \0300com \07 -0330 city memo - jfoley.doc • • RECOMMENDED BUFFER WIDTH Wetland A has been evaluated utilizing the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. This methodology has been developed to evaluate wetland values based on the functions provided. Using the rating system Wetland A was classified as a Category IV slope wetland scoring 20 points. Wetland A provides minimal water quality function (4 points) and minimal hydrologic function (3 points). The primary function provided by this wetland is wildlife habitat (13 points). Efforts to enhance wildlife habitat within the proposed buffer would further improve the primary function of this wetland. Buffer reduction is permitted under City Code section 18.45.080(G), which permits a reduction of no more than 50 percent of the standard buffer. For Wetland A DEA recommends a reduced wetland buffer of 25 ft with enhancement of the existing 25 foot buffer. The buffer currently contains compacted soils with bluegrass (Poa sp.), velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Buffer enhancement activities could include the planting of native shrubs and ground cover and soil amending activities to support their growth. Native shrub species may include Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta), vine maple (Acer circinatum), Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa) or other species suitable to the site. The goal of buffer enhancement activities will be to remove non - native plant species and increase the ability of the buffer to protect wetland functions including wildlife habitat. Wetland B is not regulated under City Code 18.45.080(B), however, impacts to this wetland should be avoided. Buffer reduction with enhancement requires a buffer enhancement plan and a Type II permit from the City pursuant to 18.45.080G.2. Under 18.45.080G.5 the City requires subsequent corrective actions and long -term monitoring of the project if adverse impacts to regulated wetlands or their buffer are identified. DEA recommends coordinating with the City to identify the scope of "corrective actions" and "long -term monitoring ". The classifications and recommendations provided above are based on DEA's professional opinion developed through review of background information and considerations for documentation and site conditions at the time of the investigation. The City may require protections greater than those outlined above. January 31, 2007 Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 98166 RE: Proposed Short Plat L07 -001 Dear Mr. Foley: Rf Cizy of Tukwila Q: \Foie% Short Plat #L07- 001 \Foleyincompleteapp.doc • NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Your application for a short plat located at 14011 Macadam Road South, Tukwila, WA has been found to be incomplete. The Complete Application Checklist that you submitted is enclosed for your reference. In order to complete the application, the following must be submitted to the permit center: a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 1. The property contains environmentally sensitive areas (stream and slopes). Prepare and provide two copies of sensitive area studies (watercourse and geotechnical reports) per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (on- line at www.ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd/dcdplan.hrm) for additional information . b. PLAT SURVEY 1. Legal description of existing (and proposed) lots 2. Lot and block numbers beginning with the number (1) and numbered consecutively without omission or duplication 3. Show existing driveway 4. Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines c. SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN 1. Plan showing the location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15 %) For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream 1 01/31/2007 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phnne! 206 - 4 -.4670 • P t ' 206- 4 71 -36hs d. CIVIL PLANS Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. • • bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e. 100 yr. flood). Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". 2. Show all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks, tracts and protection measures 3. Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. 4. Show any proposed lot tract lines. 1. Existing and proposed utility improvements on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable.) Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor. 2. Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals (minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line.) 3. Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) with a feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance, contact Tukwila Public Works or go to www.ci.tukwila.wa.us /pubwks /pwpermit.htm #techinfo 4. Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants 5. Show distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures. Please be sure that all submittals are clear and legible. The "conceptual" Site Improvement Plan (prepared by Bruce MacVeigh) is difficult to read. Upon receipt of these items, City staff will re- review them for completeness. We will mail you written notification of your application's completeness or incompleteness within 14 days. This application will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.104.070(E). If you have any questions about this request, please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via email at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us 735 Rf 2 01/31/2007 Q: \Foley Short Plat #L07- 001 \Foleyincompleteapp.doc Check items submitted with application Information Required. a May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of Public Works and /or Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: — f 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (4 copies). `.. � 3. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permissio to`Enter Property (1 copy attached). V 4. One set of all plans reduced to either 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ". / �/ 5. Application Fee – up to 4 lots in LDR $585, other zones $1,170. - 5 to 9 lots in all zones $1,170. 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist (for projects with 5 -9 lots or cut/fill over 500 cubic yards see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 7. If the project requires SEPA review or involves a short plat of 5 –9 lots: Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public .Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 8. If the project involves a short plat 5 lots: Payment of a $100 mailing label'fee to the City of Tukwila or Provide one set of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) ----- within 500 fee the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings - -e.g. apartment ondos, trailer parks - -must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). 9. I e project involves a short plat of 5 – 9 lots: If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 10. Title Report: must clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and encumbrances, must be dated within 45 days of application filing (two copies). X 11. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. 12. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines - Sensitive - Area Special Study Guidelines (online at . ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd /dcdplan.htm) for additional information. 13. Printed computer plat closure or demonstrated mathematical plat closure on all lots, streets, alleys and boundaries. Allowable error of closure shall not exceed one foot in 5,000 feet. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST ,erials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain is are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be implete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). v\vi.....;,... Fn ..... \Annliwrinna \CM..DI.r_A116 d.... NIA L� February 8, 2008 City of Tukwila Planning Department Attn: Rebecca Fox Dear Ms. Fox: Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S., Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same Paragraphs 1 through 7 have been addressed by revising the SEPA Checklist. Five revised copies are attached. Subject: Resubmittal of SEPA Information, Jeff Foley /Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road S., Tukwila, WA (REVISED) The following information will help clarify our response to your letter reference the above, dated November 27, 2007 (copy attached). Paragraph 8 has prompted a revision of the geotechnical evaluation of 2007. A copy of the revised geotechnical evaluation is attached clarifying the use of some portions of the site suitable for runoff infiltration. Paragraph 9, the showing of sensitive area buffers on the survey and engineering plan, will be done upon receipt of the site report presently being prepared by David Evans and Associates. A copy of the Evans report will be provided your office at that time. Paragraph 10 is clarified by noting that the TIR for the site indicates that infiltration is feasible. Previous discussions about the site not supporting infiltration have been revised, as mentioned in the Paragraph 8 discussion, above. Paragraph 11 notes that an (horizontal) sight distance evaluation must be made of the proposed entrance to the site on Macadam Road S. The requirement has been discussed in person with Dave McPherson of Public Works, and specific evaluation criteria are being verified. Following that, the necessary field measurements will be made, the data evaluated and a report issued to the City. Paragraph 12 indicates the clarification of the number of residences proposed. In summry, it is that one existing residence will remain, one existing barn will be remodeled for use as a residence, and two new residences will be built. The total future number of residences on the site will be four. RECEIVED MAR 0 4 2008 COMMUNITY „ A . Oaf Questions relating to the above may be made directly to this office. Sincerely, ruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer foley05 /0619 Mil i. d Jeff Foley 120 SW 194 St. Normandy Park, WA 9816 November 27, 2007 RE: Foley Short Plat # 17 -001 Dear Mr. Foley: . "I", o S /elf(' a - beo ij /o 1 A • A As we discussed with you :. d Sharon Mann, Tukwila staff will require additional information in order to proceed with review of your project. Comments on the environmental review and short plat have been combined for s document. We will discuss these comments at our meeting on Wednesday, November 28, 2107 at the City of Tukwila offices. SEPA: The following comments pe . 'n to the environmental analysis. They are based on a review of the SEPA checklist, the relat letter report by David Evans and Associates (wetlands) and the reports prepared by Bruce M; Veigh (evaluation for on -site stormwater infiltration). Specific notations refer to the SEPA ecklist. 1! Pa rt A, Item 6. The one version of the sit describe what the Part A, Item 12 (map Map shows an in Part B8.h). Even tho site, no mention is m maps shows -a "swale in supporting docume Part B, Items 3a, land wetland consultant proposed project will Information provided which suggests that th David Evans and Ass rationale for this is not submittal fora Sensiti The consultant should guidelines (attached). Sensitive Areas Study Rf • C :1Docwnenls and Settings £t78Z hecklist (attached) states that 2 new residences are proposed, but plan shows 3 new residences. The checklist should clearly osed project is. ing of envirpnmentally sensitive sites). The City's Sensitive Areas ttent watercourse on the property (see also response to Item h in David Evans and Associates has identified two wetlands on the e of a possible watercourse, although one of the topographical and a "ditch ". This issue should be addressed in the checklist and tation. art B, Item I.c., stat that there are medium to silty foams. However, the geotechnical engineer's report also shows underlying sandy clay (this is important because it affects sit drology). - . Both of these responses are incorrect, as the applicant's own reported 2 wetlands on the site. It is not at all clear if the pact wetlands (or a potential watercourse) or their buffers. the City to date shows a house site located in "Wetland A ", wetland will be filled. The two -page letter report submitted by fates recommends a buffer reduction for this wetland, but the explained. The David Evans letter report is insuf'icient as a e Areas Study. repare a Sensitive Areas Study in accordance with the City's e full delineation report should be provided as part of the Port. 1 11/272007 Docwncntslfoley short plat\City- .connnents 1-- 1110.07[I].doc uu8W uoaeys dn:01. LO LZ AOr Part B., Item 3b. 1. However, the engin po 2 - 7 B, Item 3d. The checklist states that surface runoff will be l 00'/01 5 /SEA /j477A cam' However, this is con . • icted by the engineer's rep on that infiltration is not recommended for this site. The same engineer stated in a later ting report (July 26, 2007 that infiltration was appropriate for the site. w e inconsistencies should be explained. L a Geotechnical E gineering Reports, by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E., dated November 12, 2006 & July 26, 2007, shall require a peer review. The cost for this required geotec ' 'cal peer review shall be at Owner's expense. Public Works staff has requested : price quotation from Shannon & 'Wilson, Inc. 01- 10. If storm dra report per '98 King 11. Pr Sincerely, Rebecca Fox Once this informati boundaries in the fi states that one of th size of the wetland wetland ( "Wetland applicant from obta' ology if this or th t r or art B, Item 3a.3. T or wetlands. This a footprints. The appl buts, and the pro •• ' y• • A,Driste (. How many residenc proposed for the ' n is received, the City's biologists will confirm wetland/watercourse Id. It should be noted that even though David Evans and Associates wetlands is below the size threshold for regulation by the City, the to be confirmed in the field by the City's biologist. Even if the ") is below the City's acreage threshold, it does not exempt the g permits from the Corps of Engineers and Department of other wetland is proposed to be filled. e response states that no fill material will be placed in surface water t be contradicted by the site plan that shows the house cant • d •rovide a site drawing that shows the wetlands, their sed locations of houses and site e checklist states that no groundwater will be is report recommends dewatering of the site. hers on a site map per eotec .. - �vA 's P ' a i ,ate /s9-fe allow • 'ittfiiti "on-s"'s'Ci a then unty Surface Water Design Manual shall be required i. s o pfi tar Ai study prior to pre are being ek 7 4 ? It are they oar 1) ,Z Please contact me at 206-43 -3683 or rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions prior to our meeting. Rf 2 C:1Dacuments and Settings1AdministraloAr Documentslfoiey short plat\City— comnnents 1 —I 1.20.0711 l.doc 11/27/2007 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: y 4 — L -r S.ya, -- .4 - 7 2. Name of Applicant: tT,F6/e 3. Date checklist prepared: 2 SvL '0 `7 /,e /5E/ c ' O a 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): cTi9N — TUN . D 8 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. b g ,z; ;3 'o6 Agency Comments 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. /. 7"9/,/ / �X, . / /?j riC E c 7 - s, F A'4.5 / 7 4 L. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been 4 prepared, or will be prepared, directly related-to this proposal. 1 f0-S - 5 200 7 P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SEPAAPP.doc April 4, 2006 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 7 ) /�i /p ova Fjc, �iss/1lz�C b 7.3 /8 Si= fic . ms's, r1�'�.�� //� - ro Ig 6 -7 S J G--// 7:4/ t/ 7 // yet. 7 70 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site=plan, vicinity trap, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. // /Pi). 5_ 4'j V/G i9 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? ' , //1D /e I'F'S /1/ c ,e'r;vG p Z -1/ r1 -7 /S D/" S/ 7F, / 2, /% , /SZ .3en - 9o.3S • , ., tat Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: / LA Z) 5 1 _r /y.1L A./ /10 I ,•P z� s '� 27#4.Q /Li /'i Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ` �. 2 ,d 0 cam,, / - 727 .fiJ T s f N. 'S7 41-2 ,' os Si 7, . c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. /ZeD, 7 S2 - 7-y /a,9i S:r` " 117 - c'oIA-, i2 ...., 17 d1z7/� S 7E . -7 y 6e,1 Y t_S Fo c Ad , / tr v pP.f,2 P02 7) as-r,S e:),4-7 S / 7E / /V€ e/45 a -C 52 , .0,- .5 , ( �a " dCo, � . D D� a %av' /z'a. j E-5 d. Are= there= sur -face iii cations °or`histo of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ---; -.LO w ,Eie aS/ v"• ,' /" 0 /= S Ar .5vi C..s e9 1/45 - s : ,1, ,-,9 , e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. zoo C v T ( z G, o,/ —S7; 5 c' (' /A '/ . /c//7 A C / ' t� I Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: e77/ °Ai 5 G 7 �E,,c'e E y-s 7/2 .e-s/ e 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 7 e ,4 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Z �' Av)? /D 0 ►� Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Gv.9 X:0'.. ",r ,4J ✓P€42 F /<'LU /(-',4? ,g/.JG S v4 ///0 57o v S 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 7 — /7//1 7Z, /14 IE" O/4,/,5 1 / - , ..E t> L/4 -1 A / 7// c ,/707,6 n/A.1t7 O� S7F - .5 ,, . vE 5 d- MSSo c_, /. r r 4 ,&oJJ/ -4 Servo y, 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or`adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 7W4 239R/ 1// //L , 7Fiy49 vAt 3 As A A' s'f.D , h/.V/LE 7`0v 7 /-'E 1/-./57 - 4 # 4 -' /) '- / 7S /3'4, tA-//L L /A/o T /2F/. r , 64 / o L- / Fs X 02 7,'/is £AVC k 7 A2.6 S7v.o y, 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. //o, - AS /1.. -t7 /cW EL) ABo L/ 7/7 ' /0. •sue /a 7L k1/4/4_ /2//b /S E6 Aee 7EC 8 P€ /2 Sic c U 6/ Y S ,P eor 1 ,`. 1. I I, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? - If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. //0 b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. l r. jL 774 ir ,LL J1/? U, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. / o . � `- �� , �� ? ' �o 4 L /E"C 7"j 0 4, 5 e ( , /-S; 3 ' •�'� 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 6 ,5 .s /tea ' s Gz- z �• 9f'7v /' s 7 O S d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surfacegrond;aand runoff water impacts, if any: Sao ° /e, ate/ , `� pociduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other C/ tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Sh s s Pasture Cro grain t.....„...... et soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _ �� �� • Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation y i I Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check9r circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? /2 /,y0, _ 4 . � �/ z.J. s_5 A-14 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: (/ /!L � /*5 2 7 // G� ,p 5 OP 7 /o/d • .• Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: �. ? (' // rio ,4/o T Birds: aw , heron, songbirds other: /, }f, y � • .0 (4- 77J/ S .5 Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: o Fish /01 Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shell is , other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. � 9 / ( 7 / /e,e f- / 0 /-/ I d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife if any: 5 74 P LS s IUZ" L / TU . 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy electric atural gas, il, , ood stove, . olar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy nee • s. Describe w e er it will be used for eating,manufacturing, etc. Z‘.vU-7 I D Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. A/o c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /170 , 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: I I .,, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. M� .Z ',p 7- f6 /5E- .2)1ie /.. ea v / ' A, 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: f i ( J a 2/c 7 , C - 7FlJ 7v r 7)1 /C, //7 , ,,2 S - 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? /P J/ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Describe any structures on the site. - ! � � Z -...m y (e1;;--S, C 926?) LY.L /4 .� C ./ / 9 4 ) C /2i�_ 'L (( b d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A / 0 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been echas- an4environmentally, sensitive" area? If so, specify. Gv .' S 7 % Z �S7,c� P S2 5 `l /- ASS /�'L� `/"�'L.4 e S7� P So p S S'/ tC. 6,D n •�0 h to o /of/ c; G ( 2 c f PA /0 (10 7 (3 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people woul — /2_ work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Aa i k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: /V I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: /'��F o •� /N� L b 2Gviz.L /ter'' e � S 9. Housing a. A oximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle )r low- income housing? ILf O1, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. /Va ,-/ , c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: /u i¢ 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? e-Y1 tv A/0 , c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: w S "7 Z 51—.4 PE , 12. Recreation Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? /�G v S /� �f — /': 9,� ��.� �/G /may 5 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? A42 c. What existing o�ff / site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. / () C 2 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /JorN.E ei- -l0cj, I _ b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: /V/Af ■ •$I Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 14. Transportation a. Identi ublic streets d highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /11 721., S: b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? ms s— Dri /9,R0//� c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 6 / "S /2DE ( ? fix, �S•J Ou7$ / LET' . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). /V a e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Agency Comments 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 6 7A./, �25, 0 Y g. A 1� 16. Utilities Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: .DDS- �,9 - s 7 �`�,� c,✓� � 15. Public Services -Tf/i5 15' PR /v so a. Would the pro'ect result in an in - . % eed I `r t . : ervices (for example: protection, ce rotect , ealth car-, hools t ther)? If so, generally describe. "1/ /Y0 2 / - v � 1 s, s �1Jo b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: tit Signature: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. /4 L-- o 3" "0 v �' /V /.t/a C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Date Submitted: 8 JZ' ( C) //2 8 oe (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). Agency Comments d x ti V 1' 3 S 1 E[ I • • •••• p1.nvYOR 13014!90.11 g v ,.. Q -.„ 1.■•• IWO /11.11111 RIM .111111.!■ l...t„m..ta,e 10511.4,01..t .1 ftimlImMise no MEP IMIIN/M -ry ./,m...••■. >a.. .1rd. CUIPO4 1(30)ti I .m®.. O I" . 1II1fL 1 "'"' 041,E Pt ON told 13.a.t5 �s i■4 s ' I cool rotor :, Qur .ael • 075 east of co. pavilion. [GCIIOw P3ILYIMAJM4107.TTAT AM06 al OM• NLDDAACID.u. fA PL flANOLIO, OLIO, IO)T MY AI01)1,D1 NEDDOXIL Mom 1000014.13 .J, fNP. S6NDYMT Ona,rtrll) IL osf Y ®DMF wAN ?fl.W) � 3...72 way MT 0.17LED) i ) A•. lffDDNLLONarICOmA I170031Q1D DRM:ISwT CUT DANU600af 0a MO) 1L O07 HmOM11nAal NIDO•e114 F(cmmm DIUVEW.T na EBOARL Orr ON r.y 11 f 10.1110 DIUM AY M D0l`03.0I1 OR Rip 44' ,,`,1,� �� aFO ,�'r si w�m•c IYL7// � '1,� j��` Ir , .w, l � �' MO 4 0rB ax narYN w• a r' •1 ioe.1 •e. Zd 1. Irf rm />i� 17AFIW r raM abs . eap ;WMa deal I.. EARTHWORK ESTIMATES CUT 1.200 CY FRL 1.505 CT (INCL TRENCH GRAVEL) rn #0 /c• AWnr ,/13 cwlr/a[.vr , O K? z1 • r f7,iA ` _ S • 7YOL L efolir, cs- /..1 r.rr3r «Ir.P ee'1411-Z •a mun.Gar1 , D.r J7L1 FLeK - r LO'IN.N/! •.. S-at. a.A n. • 1357 L Tg r 1 n 134.5 »..TITACRr).13ar ACTIVITY SCHEME: 1. STANNIC; BY SURVEYOR • 2. PLACE SILT FENCE AS SHOWN 3 PERFORM ROUGH GRADING OF NEW DRIVEWAY AREAL 1, INSTALL NEW CATCH BASINS AND DRAINAGE PIPE/TRENCH. INSTALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AT THIS TIME. INSTALL SILT TRAP IN NEW CATCH BASINS. 5. PERFORM FINE GRADING OF NEW AM) DRIVEWAY AREA IL PAVE NEW ROAD AND DRIVEWAY AREAS. 7. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS WITH GRASS SEED. IL REMOVE SILT FENCING AND CATCH BASIN SILT TRAPS ONCE VEGETATION 13 REESTABLISHED. .:: :1 /� V /CITY /TY /•. w "" /N MAP A g 3 ; x !of aM .e> a/coo ERAS am south • all oval of ak Z -4• M..fbfNraty /r.. SG »LL S)a. I'!AM Iona near . /.m own O • SOY .ea ~Ica. 17 • .LL• /30.4 1 /L 4•. 1040 rNONVN. W / ?FL LAS? n � m /I x •x�' ala caunitc sciaz Dear Sir: t ,.per Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S., Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same November 12, 2006/Revised February 8, 2008 City of Tukwila Attn: Planning Department Subject: Soils Evaluation fo Jeff Foley/Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Ro T�wnVISED) On July 28; 2006 a total of six soil logs were evaluated on the above site. Attached is a copy of the soil logs. The soils encountered typically had a surface layer of medium loam underlain by mottled sandy clay, typical of what is probably the Alderwood Association. The depth of the loam down to the clay varied from 24 to 96 inches. Additional soil observations in the cut bank for Macadam Road S. indicate the the soils lower on the site are comprised of silty loams. These soils have a low but calculatable infiltration rate. The use of on -site infiltration for the individual residences on the upper two parcels on the above site is not recommended. Several reasons are: 1. The depth of the surface silt loam varies widely and is not predictable in depth for designing trenches, especially for sites with area restraints. 2. The underlying clay loams do not infiltrate well. 3. The build up of groundwater above the clay loam layer could saturate soil needed for water removal from the trenches. The use of on -site infiltration for the road and residences on the lower two parcels appears feasible due to the silty loams in the lower portion of the site. The following factors may be noted about infiltation in this area. 1. A large common trench under the private road should be designed to accept runoff from all four houses, as well as the from the private road. It would be the most dependable, convenient and cost effective method of runoff disposal. 2. Deep test excavations extending deeper than the grade of Macadam Road S. will be needed prior to preparing the final drainage plan for this site. In summ?y, the use of on -site infiltration for stormwater removal is not recommended for the upper portions of this site. Instead, a large scale conventional underground infiltration system is recommeneed. It 1 Note that while this letter does not address other engineering aspects of the soils of the site, it may be mentioned that the soils do appear suitable for conventional paving and building construction in dry weather. Questions relating to the above may be made directly to this office. Bruce S. MacVeigh, .E. Civil Engineer a PIRE6: arty D l fob SOIL LOGS FOLEY /MANN SHORT PLAT 28 JUL 06 SL 1 0 -96" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 96- 120 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 2 0 -84" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 84 -96 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 3 0 -24" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 24 -72 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 4 0 -72 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 5 0 -96 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 6 0-48 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) FOLEY SHORT PLAT WETLAND AND WATERCOURSE SENSITIVE AREA STUDY Tukwila, Washington Prepared for: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 JEF00000 -0001 Prepared by: DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 415 - 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, Washington 98005 -3518 D D DAVID E V A N S A N D A S S O C I A T E S I N C February 2008 Prepared by: Jim Shannon Biologist DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 415 - 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, Washington 98005 -3518 I February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SPECIAL STUDY METHODS 2 1.1 Preliminary Resource Review 2 1.2 On -Site Investigation 2 3.0 RESULTS 3 1.3 Preliminary Resource Review 3 1.4 On -Site Investigation 3 1.5 Wetlands 4 1.6 Watercourses 4 4.0 REGULATION 5 1.7 Wetlands 5 1.8 Watercourses 5 5.0 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT 6 6.0 HAZARDS, RISKS, AND IMPACTS 7 7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION MEASURES 8 8.0 MITIGATION PLAN 9 9.0 REFERENCES 10 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Ecology classification and approximate size of Wetland A. 6 APPENDICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Vicinity Map Conceptual Mitigation Plan Photographs Wetland Data Forms Washington Wetland Classification System Rating Forms P :tUEF000000001 \0600INFO\EP\EP37 Wetlands \Report docs \Foley Sensitive Area Study_022508.doc Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat February 2008 Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study Page i This page left intentionally blank P.y JEF00000000110600INFO\EP\EPS7 Wetlands\Report doss\Foley Sensitive Area Study_022508.doc Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat February 2008 Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study Page ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION At the request of Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann (applicant), David Evans and Associates Inc. (DEA) has conducted a wetland and watercourse special study for the Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat (Foley Short Plat). The Foley Short Plat, King County parcel # 1523049035, is located at 14011 Macadam Road South (Appendix A). The property is located in the City of Tukwila (City), King County, Washington, in Township 23 N, Range 04 E, Section 15. The parcel is a developed 1.68 -acre property with two existing structures (i.e. a house and a barn). This wetland and watercourse special study was conducted to obtain a "special permission" for a sensitive area ordinance deviation (i.e. wetland buffer reduction) pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (City Code) 18.45.040. Specifically, the applicant requests a 50 percent buffer reduction on Wetland A from 50 feet to 25 feet. The applicant would also request a setback waiver from 10 feet to five feet from the Wetland A buffer. Adjacent land uses and ownership include residential areas and forested hillsides. The property is located to the west of Macadam Road South. Most of the land use west of Macadam Road South is a forested hillside and a few residential lots. I -5 is located to the east of Macadam Road South. The proposed project would create a 4 -lot short plat within the existing parcel. A new entrance and associated driveway off of Macadam Road South are also proposed (Appendix B -Sheet 3). Construction of the driveway will require the removal of 2,000 cubic yards of fill from the site. The existing house (Lot 2) and barn (Lot 4) would remain and two new houses are proposed (Lot 1 and Lot 3). A retaining wall is proposed to achieve the grading requirements to access the future house in Lot 4 (existing barn). The applicant proposes to use the existing concrete foundation of the barn for a proposed house in Lot 4. The barn currently encroaches into a wetland buffer (Wetland A). Mitigation is proposed in this report and will enhance Wetland A and its associated buffer habitat. The applicant proposes to enhance Wetland A and its buffer with native wetland and upland plant species. This mitigation would be monitored for five years as required by City code. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study p:' efo0000000110600info\ep \ep37 wetlands\report dots \foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 1 Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study 2.0 SPECIAL STUDY METHODS Methods used for the site reconnaissance included a preliminary resource review and an on- site visit. 1.1 Preliminary Resource Review A review of existing resource information was conducted for the site vicinity in order to identify known wetlands and streams. Resources reviewed include the following: • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Des Moines Quadrangle, 1:24,000 1988 • King County Wetland and Streams GIS data, King County, Washington, 2006 • Soil Survey — King County Area, Washington • King County — Assessor Property Characteristics Report and Districts and Development Conditions Report accessed through King County GIS Center • City of Tukwila — Stream map and buffer provided by the City 1.2 On - Site Investigation DEA biologists inspected the site on March 8, 2007, to document any wetlands or streams on the property. Weather during the site visit was overcast with light rainfall, and rain had fallen during the two previous days. Wetland presence or absence was determined according to methods established in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997) which is consistent with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Wetland classes were determined according to the USFWS Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States manual (Cowardin 1979). p: yljefo00000001\0600info\ep\ep37 wetlands\report docs\foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 2 3.0 RESULTS 1.3 Preliminary Resource Review The NWI Des Moines Quadrangle depicts no streams or wetlands on or adjacent to the property. The King County wetland and streams GIS data show no streams or wetlands on or adjacent to the property. Data from the Soils Survey for King County Washington were not available for the Tukwila area. The King County Districts and Development report describes this parcel as within the Duwamish River drainage basin in the Duwamish -Green River watershed, water resource inventory area (WRIA) 9. The aforementioned report describes no wetlands occurring on the parcel. The stream map provided by the City identifies a Type 4 watercourse with a 50 -foot buffer crossing the property from the northwest to the northeast, west of the existing barn, and traveling offsite across the southern property boundary. 1.4 On -Site Investigation The parcel is composed of mixed conifer /deciduous forest on the undeveloped slope to the west, and disturbed areas graded for the existing structures (Appendix C, Photographs 1 - 3). The property currently contains one residential home built in the 1920s, one barn, and the existing gravel driveway that enters the property from the southeast corner. South of the barn is a broad flat area that was likely used for grazing livestock. The vegetation on the property east of the slope is degraded and composed primarily of invasive species including Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). Other species on the property include red alder (Alnus rubra), bluegrass species (Poa sp.), velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), and several small planted western red cedars (Thuja plicata) east of the existing residence. The vegetation on the slope that rises on the western portion of the property is dominated by big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), western hemlock (Tsuga heterohylla), Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta), and holly (Ilex aquifolium). Invasive English Ivy (Hedera helix) is present throughout the forest floor and exists on many of the trees in this area. Observations made by DEA indicate that hydrology on the site has been altered over time. Cuts made into the slope in order to flatten and develop the area for housing and grazing exposed subsurface flows. These exposed subsurface flows appear to have been managed by p: \tj efo00000001 \0600info \ep \ep37 wetlands\report dots \foley sensitive area study_022508.doc Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat February 2008 Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study Page 3 the excavation of a ditch, which transported waters to the south beyond the parcel boundary (Appendix C, Photograph 4). The ditch appears to have flowed into an existing stream that begins in a small seep - wetland south of the property line. The ditch on the property was not maintained and over time ceased to transport waters south along the toe of slope. Additional observations indicate attempts to drain the exposed flows with French drains. An existing French drain directs waters accumulated under the driveway to a ditch that flows to a catch basin along Macadam Road. 1.5 Wetlands Two wetlands were delineated on the property (Appendix D). Both of these wetlands occur along the toe of slope at the western edge of the developed portion of the property. These wetlands are considered palustrine scrub /shrub wetlands, with hydrology provided by seeps at the slope break. These wetlands are rarely inundated with water and are often only saturated to the surface. The presence of hydrology, predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and the presence of hydric soils qualify these areas as wetland. Both wetlands are disturbed due to the proximity to human activities that have altered the site including grazing, gravel stockpiling, and the presence of invasive species. Wetland A occurs south of the existing barn on the property in L -4 (Appendix C, Photographs 5 and 6). Vegetation in this wetland includes red alder, Himalayan blackberry, creeping buttercup, and velvet grass. The wetland data plot contained gleyed (4 /10Y) silty clay soil with reddish brown mottles (5YR 4/4) from 4 to 16 inches and qualifies as hydric. Waters enter this wetland from cuts made for the ditch at the slope break, and the delineated areas were saturated to the surface during the March 6 field visit. Wetland B occurs near the northwest extent of the driveway at the base of the slope in L - (Appendix C, Photograph 7). This wetland is less than 1,000 square feet in size and has a connection to the remnant portion of the excavated ditch that no longer extends to the area of Wetland A. Vegetation in this wetland includes red alder, Himalayan blackberry, creeping buttercup, and reed canary grass. The wetland data plot contained very dark grey (10YR 3/1) soils with strong brown (7.5YR 4/6) mottles from 4 to 16 inches and qualified as hydric. 1.6 Watercourses DEA delineated the top of spoils and centerline for the excavated ditch identified on the property (Appendix C, Photograph 4). The ditch picks up seepage from the hillside and the waters infiltrate. The spoils and ditch become less pronounced as it travels to the south and was considered terminated when the lowest part of the ditch was not distinguishable. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4-Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study p:\ fljefo00000001\0600info\ep\ep37 wetlands\report docs \foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 4 The ditch contained no gravel or sand substrate. Substrate was similar to the soils in the area and covered with leaves that showed no indication of water stains. DEA identified an automobile battery and muffler within the excavated ditch. Field observations indicated that this ditch formerly connected to the area at the toe of slope in Wetland A. 1.7 Wetlands 1.8 Watercourses 4.0 REGULATION City Code regulates development parameters around sensitive areas and their buffers through Chapter 18.45. The terms "watercourse" and "wetland" are defined by sections 18.06.918 and 18.06.922, respectively. Designations, ratings, and buffers for wetlands are detailed in section 18.45.080; uses, alterations, and mitigation are outlined in section 18.45.090. Watercourse designations, ratings, and buffers are provided in section 18.45.100; uses, alterations, and mitigation procedures are listed in section 18.45.110. Wetland A is considered a Type 3 wetland, which requires a 50 -foot buffer and a building setback of 10 feet (Appendix C). City Code defines a Type 3 wetland as "...those wetlands that are greater than 1,000 square feet and less than one acre in size with two or fewer wetland classes." Wetland B does not fit the description provided for a Type 3 wetland above because it is less than 1,000 square feet in size. City Code does not provide a standard buffer width in section 18.45.080(B) for wetlands less than 1,000 square feet. Wetland B occurs in L -4 at the toe of the slope and will not be impacted by this project. Because there is no impact to Wetland B and its buffer is not regulated by the City, there will be no further discussion of Wetland B in this document. The watercourse mapped by the City as occurring on site does not appear to fulfill the definition provided in City Code section 18.06.920. The definition describes a watercourse as " ...generally consisting of a channel with a bed and banks or sides substantially throughout its length along which water flows naturally." During the site visit, DEA did not delineate the entire length of the watercourse depicted by the City due to the lack of bed and bank. No natural surface flows were identified, and indications of past flows were absent. The current status of the watercourse according to the City is a Type 4 stream with a 50 -foot buffer and a 10 -foot building setback. p:\ j\jefo00000001 \0600info \ep\ep37 wetlands\report docs'oley sensitive area study_022508.doc Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat February 2008 Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study Page 5 5.0 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT The Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology 2004) was used for the functional assessment of Wetlands A (Appendix E). This methodology has been developed to evaluate wetland values based on the functions provided. Using the rating system Wetland A was classified as a Category IV slope wetland scoring 20 points (Table 1). Table 1. Ecology classification and approximate size of Wetland A. Ecology Classification Water Size HGM Quality Hydrologic Habitat Total Ecology (approx. Wetland Type Score Score Score Score Category sq ft) A S 4 3 13 20 IV 1,347 Wetland A provides minimal water quality function (4 points) and minimal hydrologic function (3 points). The primary function provided by Wetland A is wildlife habitat (13 points). Currently the habitat of Wetland A is degraded. An existing fence as well as a pasture area contributes to the degraded condition of the wetland and its buffer. Himalayan blackberry, an invasive plant species, is present in the wetland and its buffer. Fish use does not occur on -site. Wetland A has no standing water and therefore no fish use. Wildlife use of the property is likely fairly extensive and provides habitat for an array of wildlife. The property is within a forested corridor that runs from 144th Street to the end of Macadam Road South. Although the corridor has been encroached upon by various developments, it still provides suitable habitat for wildlife. The parcel includes a forested hill that provides cover, forage, and breeding opportunities for amphibians, birds, and small mammals. Efforts to enhance wildlife habitat within the buffers of Wetland A would further improve the primary function of these wetlands. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study pAf efo00000001 \0600info\ep \ep37 wetlands\report docs \foley sensitive area study_022508 doc February 2008 Page 6 6.0 HAZARDS, RISKS, AND IMPACTS There will be no permanent hazards, risks, or impacts to wetlands or watercourses from this project. We are not proposing to fill or drain any wetlands on -site. The hydrology of the wetlands comes from the hillside slope where no impacts will occur. Temporary impacts to Wetland A and its buffer are anticipated during the installation of the mitigation plan. These temporary impacts include human disturbance while installing enhancement plants. All disturbed areas will be reseeded with a native upland hydroseed mix. The mitigation plan calls for vegetation enhancement of Wetland A and its associated buffer. Wetland A and its buffer currently lack a diversity of vegetation. An increase in vegetation diversity and density will add to the habitat value of Wetland A and its buffer. Storm water runoff during construction will be managed with a temporary erosion and sedimentation control (TESC) plan. This TESC plan will include the installation of a silt fence around the buffer of Wetland A to minimize the potential of any sediment from project construction that may enter the wetland. Storm water runoff from the new and existing impervious surfaces is projected for on -site infiltration in the access /utility easement under the driveway area. If further investigation indicates unsuitable soils at depths required for an infiltration trench, then runoff would be treated in an alternative manner. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study p:\ j\jefo00000001\0600info \ep \ep37 wetlands\report dots \foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 7 7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION MEASURES The original plan has avoided filling any wetlands on -site. New areas of disturbance were avoided by using the existing footprint of the barn as a location for one of the houses. Currently the barn is located in the Wetland A buffer. The proposal avoids building any structures on the slope of the western half of the parcel. This portion of the parcel is densely vegetated and will remain undeveloped. We propose to install a temporary silt fence around the perimeter of Wetland A buffer and Wetland B during construction. This will minimize potential impacts to these areas. Also, before construction begins a split rail fence will be installed around the eastern edge of Wetland A buffer. This fence will also have sensitive area signage to deter trespass into Wetland A and its buffer. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4-Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study p:\4 efo00000001 \O600info \ep \ep37 wetIandsteport docs \foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 8 Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study 8.0 MITIGATION PLAN Buffer reductions for wetlands are allowed under City Code section 18.45.080(G) for both wetlands and watercourses. The applicant requests a buffer reduction for Wetland A from 50 to 25 feet and a setback waiver from 10 to 5 feet. The wetland buffer reduction would only occur on the south and east sides of Wetland A. The forested buffer north and west of Wetland A buffer would remain at 50 feet. Without the requested buffer reduction mitigation required for the proposed project, at a 1 to 1 ratio, would be approximately 3,000 square feet. However, with the buffer reduction only 581 square feet of Wetland A buffer will be impacted (i.e. a proposed house using the footprint of the existing barn). To compensate for the buffer reduction and mitigate for the impact of using the footprint of the existing barn we propose to enhance 2,749 square feet of Wetland A buffer with native upland plants and enhance 1,347 square feet of Wetland A with native wetland plants (Appendix B). Appendix B contains the objectives, performance standards, monitoring, and maintenance of the proposed mitigation. These enhancement plantings will be monitored once a year in the late summer for five years from installation. An annual report will be delivered to the City of Tukwila for review. p :Viefo00000001\0600info \ep \ep37 wetlands \ eport doss\foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 9 9.0 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., and V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS /OBS 79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y -87 -1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. March. Publication 96 -94. . 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Publication No. 04 -06 -025. Ecology, Olympia, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. 1973. Soil Survey of the King County Area. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study pAhefo00000001 \0600info\ep \ep37 wetiandstreport docs \foley sensitive area study_022508.doc February 2008 Page 10 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: VICINITY MAP 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 1 _ I ► l 1 ► ► I N Highway Street Parcel Boundary City of Tukwilla ME Foley Short Plat Vicinity Map JEF00000 -0001 February 2008 Appendix A e DAVID EVANS ..o ASSOCIATES .c APPENDIX B: CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION PLAN WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT PROPOSED MITIGATION WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT. 581 S.F. ® 1:5 enhancement 2749 S.F. (0.06 AC) TOTAL WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT = 581 S.F. Additional Wetland A' enhoncement 1347 S.F. (0.03 AC) TOTAL MITIGATION PROVIDED = 4096 S.F. (0.09 AC) WETLAND A W W W 4 4 4 WETLAND W W MITIGATION AREA 4, • 4 W y ' W 4 , / \ I 1AA WETLAND BUFFER _;\ 46 5' SETBACK FROM EX. FOOTINGS TO BASEMENT RETA :NING WALL CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATION SUMMARY A PORTION OF THE S.E.1 /4 OF THE N.W.1 /4 OF SECTION 31, T27N, R5E, WM LEGEND: EXISTING WETLAND WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT SENSITIVE AREA SIGN (to be placed approximately every 50') INDEX: SHEET MMGATION SUMMARY SHEET 1 of 4 MITIGAT1ON REPORT SHEET 2 of 4 MITIGATION LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 of 4 MITIGATION DETAILS 4 of 4 (4 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1" PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 7 U) Z W >< W5 2 < co O< z REVISIONS: APPD. DATE: 2 -8 -08 DESIGN: TRS DRAWN: TRS CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: SCALE: 1' =20' PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 DRAWING FILE: JEFO 0001 — M 1 SHEET NO. M -1 OF 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MONITORING METHODS MONITORING INTERVAL 1. 100 percent survival of all installed native trees and shrubs one -year post installation. 2. Planted and volunteer tree and shrub species shall achieve: Year 1 - 100%1 survival; Year 3 - 90% survival: Year 5 - 75% survival. 3. At the end of the monitoring period. the following species will comprise <10% of the total vegetative cover in the mitigation areas; Himalayan blackberry, reed conarygross, Scots broom, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, or any other invasive species os determined by the biologist. 1. Total plont count of installed trees and shrubs shall determine one year warranty and performance stondords for years 1 -5. Photographic documentation shall occur from established photopoints to provide odditionol documentation of plant success in each monitoring yeor. Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Wetland and buffer vegetation) 4. At least 1 notive tree species and 4 native shrub species shall be established in the mitigation area. Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Wetland and wetland buffer) 1.0 MITIGATION PLAN OVERVIEW 1.1 UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS TO WETLAND BUFFER Construction of the project will result in unavoidable impoct to 581 SF (0.013 AC) of wetland ff r. Th p j o po 0 58 5 (0 0 3 C) o bu e The impacted wetland buffers consist of degraded posture and disturbed areas. 1.2 MITIGATION APPROACH WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT Mitigation for impacts to 581 SF of wetland buffers will be accomplished by wetland and wetlond buffer enhancement. Enhancement area is based on o 1:1 mitigation ratio established by the City of Tukwila. A total of 581 SF (0.013 AC) will occur in Wetland A and A buffer. Wetland and buffer enhancement oreos shall be cleared of invasive weeds and planted with votive trees and shrubs to improve plant diversity and wildlife habitat. 2.0 MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. Replace lost functions from impacts to 581 SF of Category IV wetlond by enhancing 581 SF of existing Category IV Wetland A and A buffer. Enhancement will occur by removing invasive weeds and installing native trees and shrubs. 3.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Performance standards hove been established that correspond to the stated mitigation goals and objectives. These standards are the primary foctors that shall be used to judge the success of the mitigation project. It shall be exceedingly important to evaluate the development of the mitigation plan over the entire monitoring period when determining whether each individual standard has been met or not. While specific performance criteria provide important benchmarks and sholl help to direct maintenance and contingency efforts, the success of mitigation must be measured against the goals and objectives of the overall mitigation plan. By monitoring the project and comparing monitoring results to performance standards, a determination con be made for the need to implement maintenance efforts or the contingency plan. Performance standards are identified in the table below. PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4.0 MONITORING PLAN Mitigation monitoring shall be conducted by a Wetland Biologist for five (5) years which includes the installation inspection (one year warranty inspection). The objective of the monitoring program shall be to assess revegetation success. Reports describing monitoring results shall be submitted to the City of Tukwila by December 31 of years 1 through 5. The monitoring results shall be related to the performance standards and if warranted, recommendations shall be mode based on these findings. 4.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF SENSI11VE AREAS Encroachment into sensitive areas shall be monitored during each visit. The sensitive areas shall be inspected for clearing, trash dumping and other unauthorized disturbances. Any encroachments in the sensitive oreos shall be noted and directed to the City's attention. 4.2 VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT All mitigation plantings shall be monitored for 5 years and shall include a total survival count. Overview photographs shall be taken from established photopoints. All planted trees and shrubs shall be evaluated in years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to document vegetation development. The monitoring shall be a complete census of plantings. 4.3 MITIGATION MAINTENANCE If necessary, maintenance actions shall be recommended by the monitoring biologist. Maintenance within the mitigation areas shall be performed by the landscape controctor during the one year warranty period. Following the one year warranty period, maintenance shall be performed os necessary to ensure mitigation goals and objectives ore met. Implementation of maintenance actions is the responsibility of the project proponent (Jeff Foley). 5.0 MITIGATION SEQUENCING Construction of the mitigation sites shall generally include: 1. A pre - construction meeting; 2. Marking limit of work for mitigation boundaries; 3. Removal of invasive species and installation of plants as specified; 4. Post - construction meeting between all involved parties: 5. Removal of limit of work demarcations; 6 Implementation of monitoring progrom; 7. On -going maintenance as necessary. 5.1 PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING A pre- construction meeting shall be held on -site between the project engineer, all necessary construction contractors (general and landscape contractors), and Wetland Biologist and or Landscape Architect. During this meeting, site conditions, permit, specifications, and the mitigation plans shall be reviewed. This shall assist all involved parties in understanding the intent, specifications, and requirements of the mitigotion plan. 5.2 MARKING OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FOR MITIGATION AREA BOUNDARIES limit f w boundaries f h mitigation r h l m k f' I prior The t o ark bou da es o the areas sholl I be marked in the field r o to preliminary P ti Y site preparation, earthwork, or planting by the contractor. Boundaries shall be marked by installing orange temporary construction fencing to clearly delineate the mitigation area. 5.3 PLANTING PLAN All mitigation plants shall be native species. See plant schedule on Sheet 3 of 4. 5.4 POST - CONSTRUCTION MEETING A post - construction site review of the completed work shall be conducted between the Landscape Architect / Wetland Biologist and the contractor to verify thot the pion was properly implemented. This field meeting shall identify any discrepancies between the pion and the field plantings and if necessary, propose corrective measures. If the plan was properly implemented, the monitoring period shall commence. 6.0 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION The Wetland Biologist or Landscape Architect (construction observer) shall be on -site periodically during the implementation of the mitigation area to review the plant installation. The responsibilities of the construction observer(s) shall include: responding to contractor questions regarding unique construction or planting techniques; review of construction materials and nursery stock, and review of plant locations. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to verify that plan specifications have been met. 7.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN The contingency plan shall provide remediotion for the mitigation goals that have not been met. If the desired mitigation goals, as measured by the monitoring program and performance standards, have not been met and cannot be achieved through routine maintenance, then o determination by the City of Tukwila and the project proponent may be mode to require submittal of a contingency plan. After written approval by the City, a contingency plan shall be implemented that compensates for the foiled goals of the approved mitigation plan. If the contingency plan is substantial, the City shall extend the monitoring period. 8.0 PERFORMANCE SECURITY Certificote of occupancy shall not be complete until the mitigation plan is installed, inspected, approved and bonded. In order to ensure that the mitigation is properly implemented. including monitoring and contingencies, the project proponent (Jeff Foley) shall provide a Performance Bond following King City procedures. The total cost. plus contingency fees, shall be the amount of the Performance Bond. The Performance Bond shall become effective following installation and approval by the City. A. MITIGATION COST ESTIMATE: BOND ESTIMATE (Includes labor, materials, maintenance and monitoring for 5 years, 30% contingency and mobilization) TOTAL COST ESTIMATE: $ 3,990.00 8. THE PERFORMANCE BOND (120% OF A) IS ESTIMATED TO BE: $ 4,788.00 J 0_ Z O0- w W Z 0 2 Z V a. Q VJ LcE g) W ui 0 VJ Z O � W E <ww W 4 J m LL SCALE: O Z MC; ZW < W Q CO 0 < 0 REVISIONS: APPD. DATE: 2 -8 -08 DESIGN: TRS DRAWN: TRS CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 DRAWING FILE: JEFO_0001 �J2 SHEET NO. M -2 OF 4 A PORTION OF THE S.E.1 /4 -OF THE N.W.1 /4 OF SECTION 31, T27N, R5E, WM \s ��11111/7 -- TREES = RC = Thujo plicata V e PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SZE H1,B6,GAL SPACING QUANTITY Western Red Cedar HT, 3' -4', BB 15' -20' 0. C. 5 SHRUBS /GROUNOCOVERS Acer circinatum Vine Mople HT, 4' -6', 8B 10' O.C. 6 Carnus sericeo Red Osier Dogwood HT 15' -24', 2 GAL 8' 0. C. 8 Holodiscus discolor Ocean Spray HT 15' -24', 2 GAL. 6' O.C. 3 Lonicero involucrata Black Twinberry HT 15' -24', 2 GAL. 6' O.C. Rosa nutkano Nootko Rose HT 15' -24', 2 GAL 3' 0.C. Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon Grope HT 15' -24', 2 GAL 3' 0.C. 12 Salix scouleriona Scouter Willow LIVE STAKES 24 0.C. 48 Salix lasiondra Pacific Willow UVE STAKES 24' O.C. 64 NOTE: Eoch willow symbol is equal to 16 live stokes. BUFFER HYDROSEED MIX LEGEND: EXISTING WETLAND ENHANCEMENT WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT SENSITIVE AREA SIGN (to be placed approximately every 50') KIND/VARIETY BARCLAY PERENNIAL RYEGRASS RED CREEPING FESCUE HARD FESCUE % BY WEIGHT 70% 202 109. MIN. 9. GERM 902 909. 902 APPLICATION RATE. 120 LBS /ACRE CANFOR WOOD CELLULOSE ECO —FIBER MULCH: 2000 LBS /ACRE NUTRICULTURE SEED STARTER FERTILIZER (16- 45 -7):_ 200 LBS /ACRE CANFOR ECO —TAC GUAR TACKIRER: 60 LBS /ACRE STAY MOIST MOISTURE RETENTION AGENT 60 LBS /ACRE PLANTING NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED OF INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES. WETLAND AREA SHALL BE GRUBBED BY HAND. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN NURSERY LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION (ANLA) STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z 60.1 -2004) FOR GRADE AND SIZE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN. 3. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF PLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SOURCES OR SUBSTITUTIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4 PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSPECTED AT THE NURSERY, OR PROJECT SITE, BY THE OWNER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5 FAILURE TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS OF MATERIALS AND OF INSTALLATION METHODS AFTER TWO INSPECTIONS SHALL SUBJECT THE CONTRACTOR TO INSPECTION FEES, PAID TIME AND MATERIALS AT THE STANDARD RATE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6 IN THE EVENT OF VARIATION BETWEEN THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN THE PLANS, THE PLANS SHALL CONTROL. 7 ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND AS SHOWN IN THE THE PLANTING DETAILS- 8 WETLAND BUFFER PLANTING PITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH CEDAR GROVE 2 —WAY TOPSOIL MIX (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). WETLAND PLANTING PITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH CEDAR GROVE COMPOST (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). BACKFILL PLANT PITS WITH 3 PARTS EXISTING NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL TO 1 PART SPECIFIED AMENDMENT. REMOVE EXCESS EXISTING SOIL FROM SITE. 9 ALL PLANT PITS SHALL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS: 3" DEEP X APPROXIMATELY TWICE THE ROOTBALL DIAMETER. BUFFER PLANTING PITS SHALL BE BARK MULCH AND WETLAND PLANTING PITS SHALL BE COMPOST MULCH. 10. BUFFER PLANTING AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITH HYDROSEED MIX. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY TIME RELEASE FERTILIZER TO PLANT PITS (OSMOCOTE TM OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. NO FERTILIZER SHALL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE OWNER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE PLANTING INSTALLATION TO INSPECT THE METHOD AND LAYOUT OF PLANTING USED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 13. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OF THE PLANTING AREAS DURING THE INSTALLATION, AND WARRANTY PERIOD. 14. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 15. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR THOROUGHLY WHEN PLANTED AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST ONE INCH OF WATER PER WEEK DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON (MARCH 15 TO OCTOBER 15) FOLLOWING MITIGATION INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR WILL WATER THE ENTIRE SITE WEEKLY, EXCLUDING SIGNIFICANT RAINY PERIODS. 2 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS DURING INSTALLATION AND THE WARRANTY PERIOD. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO REMAIN ALIVE AND HEALTHY DURING THIS PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL DEAD OR UNHEALTHY PLANTS, PER PLANS AND AS IDENTIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/ BIOLOGIST DURING THE ONE YEAR WARRANTY INSPECTION. 3 ALL MITIGATION PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TWICE DURING THE FIRST YEAR BY WEED REMOVAL (IN EARLY APRIL /MAY AND SEPTEMBER /OCTOBER). ALL HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY, EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY SCOT'S BROOM, JAPANESE KNOTWEED, REED CANARYGRASS, CLIMBING NIGHTSHADE, PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE, MORNING GLORY, VETCH, TANSY RAGWORT AND THISTLE SHALL BE REMOVED WITH ROOT CROWNS GRUBBED OUT. OTHER WEEDS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / WETLAND BIOLOGIST. PERMIT SUBMITTAL— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1 " =20 Q -J o- zOQ-0 w CO 0_ Z Q Z Q Z c � ` z 0 W3 z w F W Z z cr m REVISIONS: APPD. DATE: 2 -8 -08 DESIGN: TRS DRAWN: TRS CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: SCALE: 1' =20' PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 - 0001 DRAWING FILE: WRLC6_SBRP_WM3 SHEET NO. M -3 OF 4 ROOT BALL SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE ROOT CROWN 1 " -2" ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE 3" BARK OR COMPOST MULCH (SEE 7 — PLANTING NOTES SHEET M -3), HOLD BACK 4" FROM MAIN STEM FINISH GRADE AMEND EXISTING SOIL BACK -FILL • FERTILIZER EXISTING SUBGRADE ROOT CROWN 2 " -4" ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE 3" BARK MULCH (SEE PLANTING NOTES SHEET M -3), HOLD BACK 2 " -3" FROM MAIN STEM 3" RIM BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX FINISH GRADE REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET FROM ROOT BALL AMEND EXISTING SOIL BACK -FILL FERTILIZER EXISTING SUBGRADE DECIDUOUS MULTI—STEM TREE PLANTING MIN. 2X ROOT BALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX SEE PLANT SCHEDULE SHEET M -3 NOT TO SCALE 2X2 HARDWOOD STAKE DRIVEN TO REFUSAL (24" MIN.). SECURE TO TREE WITH PLASTIC LOCK STRIP. TOP OF STAKE TO POINT TO PREVAILING WIND. ROOT CROWN 2 " -4" ABOVE GRADE 3" COMPOST OR BARK MULCH (SEE NOTES SHEET M -3) , HOLD BACK 2 " -3" INCHES FROM MAIN STEM 3" BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX S E PLANT SCHEDULE SHEET M -3 FINISH GRADE REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET FROM ROOT BALL AMEND EXISTING SOIL BACK -FILL FERTILIZER EXISTING SUBGRADE Sensitive Area Boundary Protection of this natural wetland area is in your care. Alteration or disturbance is prohibited by law. Please call the City of Fife Department of Community Development for more Information TRIM STAKE TO PROTRUDE 8" -12' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 LEAF NODES EXPOSED FINISHED GRADE OA 7 I� I I. 11 SOIL SOIL i .11 Ilk 11 III CUT END TO A POINT .41 FOR EASIER INSTALLATION USE CUTTINGS 20" MIN LIVE STAKE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 1 =11 —lit 1 -'I =_= 1- SENSMVE AREA SIGN CUT TOP SQUARE FOR EASIER INSTALLATION, PROTECT TOP FROM SPLITTING. INSERT STAKE WITH BUDS POINTING UP TRIM OFF BRANCHES WITH CLEAN CUTS MIN. BURIAL 12" INTO SOIL PRE - PRINTED PLASTIC SIGN SPLIT MORTISE CEDAR POST ON SPLIT RAIL FENCE _III iI= - '1 iI: CONCRETE FOOTING NOT TO SCALE NOTES: ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH TWO 5/16 GALVANIZED LAG BOLTS WITH WASHERS (TYP). 1. THE SENSITIVE AREA SIGN SHALL BE POSTED AT THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER, SETBACK AREA OR SETBACK TRACT AND THE BUILDING SETBACK AREA. 2. ONE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED PER LOT FOR EVERY 150 FEET OF SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER AND SHALL BE STATIONED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION, i.e.: AT THE CLOSEST POINT TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SIGNS MAY ALSO BE ATTACHED TO FENCES. PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION J Z O0— U w z 7:4 5 aa i �Z w E m z W gm u_ a� J O M LL SCALE: OF 4 d = m co en Z W ) 41— 'co'R W >4 < H H L C N jco Q y mt= QN 0<>0 o O REVISIONS: APPD. DATE: 2 -8 -08 DESIGN: TRS DRAWN: TRS CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 DRAWING FILE: JEFO_0001 _M - 4 SHEET NO. M -4 APPENDIX C: PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 1 — Existing house barn, and driveway looking northwest. Forested siope in background. Photo 3 — Undeve siope to the west of buildings and driveway Forested buffer of Wetland A. Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4-Lo Short Plat Wetland and Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study Photo 2 — The existing grave driveway and barn looking southeast. Macadam Road in the background. Photo 4 — Ditch along the toe of the siope. The termination of the delineated ditch is Iocated near the barn. Wetlands \Photos.do" February 2008 Photo 5 — The interior of Wetland A looking north toward the existing barn. „Jeff IFoley,and'Sharon Mann 4-Lot Short Plat \Wetlandiand'Watercourse Sensitive Areas Study Photo 6 — Wetland A looking south toward the barn. The flag in the foreground is an upland data plot. The western wetland boundary runs parallel to the red alders. I P:V\ J E F000000001\06001 NFO \EPIEP37T,W etlands\Photos.doc IFebruary.2008 APPENDIX D: WETLAND DATA FORMS Project/Site: *le SLt-E, t Ptb.t Applicant/owner: — 4 -- e,..“' ,Q L O J / 'S L f v" rikA v., v.. Investigator(s): �� /' 1% Mali L 0 Date: 18104 County: f �;. on State: y � N S/T/R: 16 /Z% AJ Ito Do Normal Circumstances exist on a site? no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes d Is the area a Problem Area? yes Explanation of atypical or problem area: Community ID: 5 S • Transect ID: - • Plot ID: vi,_ L, jj d T VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Al H KOS co bcc4_ S C) -CA L Q"�,Lu1►n" re it �vtr� . d�5co r 5 20 rACU; r ; HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION % of dominants OBL, FACW, Check all indicators that apply Visual observation of plant species areas of ,prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature INDICATORS: & FAC 0/.5 Physiological Wetland /reproductive adaptations plant database knowledge of regional plant communities (explain) & explain growing below: in < 2<-- Personal Other lllydrophytic vegetation present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 0 . • • HYDROLOGY yes (record temp no ) Is itthe growing season? Based on: soil temp Water Marks: yes no on Sediment Deposits: yes' no Drift Lines: yes no .. . .. Drainage Patterns o ..other (explain) Dept. of inundation: Depth to free water in pit: Depth to saturated soil: v*uw i inches inches inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels <12 in. yes 'no Local Soil Survey: yes no 1 4 FAC Neutral: yes no ; Water - stained Leaves yes no 0 Check all that apply & explain Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial. hoto_ a hs: below: : .Other: Other (explain): ���ut�t� `` � tt • ` J d �Z Wetland hydrology: present? } for decision/Remarks: `9rbis ;� d r. vim■ ey y Q P S no G c a. N, sl,��a, . Af�e0. chft.1 Ns � .0 kJc • DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination -(WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Profile Description .. .. ' Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Mansell • moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Motte abundance Mottle size & contrast _ Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing'of soil profile = (match descri im ) ' 0 -4 " A bye Lilt .;/"..-.' " s ‘Ii- 1 w, , . ,. • y_(( + 1 1 Y 6YQ 4/L Lao t ,- �o� � 5� 1 y chi 1�, r Hydric Soil Indicators: . Histosol (check all that apply)- Moisture Regime Conditions or Low -C • it a (7 matrix - Matrix chroma _.. 2 with mottles Concretions Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Streaking in Sandy Soils National/Local Hydric Soils List in remarks) Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe . . Sulfidic,Odor .. High'Organic Aquic Organic Reducing Listed on Gleyed Other (explain Hydric soils present? dill no Rationale for decision/Remarks. .Wetland Determination (circle) es no no Is the sampling point 4 no no • within a wetland? • . Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? Wetland hydrology present? Rationale/Remarks: d ' L �t�.,.ct ��e c: f � , -1:0 b�. , c[e �vuc�-ect t.)1, riaih tc��'►,�� � c • SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgroup) NOTES: f(Ca JCL 1 ` G to( Q Drainage Class Field observations confirm Yes mapped type? Revised 4/97u ) Project/Site: F0 l e y S k Pio.t- - Applicant/owner: J e f f F t ) le 7/ S( ran MA 'la Investigator(s): k irk M otA Me/ Date: 3/o '/o 7 County: k J (r' State: wfl S/T/R: 23 N� Do Normal Circumstances exist on a site? yes no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes no Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Explanation of atypical or problem area: Community ID: 5 Transect ID: -- Plot ID: Dr i _ 1 r A VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Poct Pr'/e 5 /.5 yo FJqC C I r S I urn Ar�te.n�& 5 FA tit p�la1a r;5 AhAncr; r�ucet N /0 FA C U) i�arl,A,,(A5 f-C )4 / 5 F /Cpj ' (u(IuS Arrr1Pn �O Ff C� RIAme? cr�SpUs 4 5 CA IIYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION % of dominants OBL, FACW, Check all indicators that apply Visual observation of plant species areas of prolonged inundation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature INDICATORS & FAC v Physiological/reproductive Wetland adaptations plant database knowledge of regional plant communities (explain) & explain growing /saturation below: in X Personal Other Rydrophytic vegetation present? yes no ,.. Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY yes (record temp - him no ) Is it the growing season? Based on: soil temp Water Marks: yes no Oil o Sediment Deposits: yes no Drift Lines: Lines: yes Drainage Patterns: yes no X. other (explain) ' e ea r Dept. of inundation: Depth to f r e e water in pit: :Depth to saturated soil: /lone inche. inches inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels <12 in. yes to Local Soil Survey: yes no 1 4t FAC Neutral: yes no Water- stained Leaves yes no none Check all that apply & explain Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: below: — Other: — Other (explain): — Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 1) W Ltttr o r ,S-,. far irin 1., r 7 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Profile Description ' Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color (Munsell moist) ' Mottle colors ( Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of soil profile - — (match description) 0 - y q • OA 3 1z- — SAit J dad foam LH (/ r 0 ' ig. i i) - .S 1g VI/ so vif lo ,v, Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (check all that apply) Odor Moisture Regime Conditions or Low - Chroma ( =1) matrix Matrix chroma < 2 with mottles Concretions Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Streaking in Sandy Soils National/Local Hydric Soils List in remarks) Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Sulfidic High Organic Aquic Organic Reducing Listed on X. Gleyed Other (explain Hydric soils present? es no Rationale for decision/Remarks: • Wetland Determination (circle) no no Is the sampling point yes no yes no within a wetland? Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? Wetland hydrology present? Rationale/Remarks: - +stx yean.o tic r e rUu1r) i∎ liro y_• No ti` p., „1" Free\ ) J 14 f�C SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomy (subgroup) NOTES: Ad*, Idle Drainage Class Field observations confirm Yes No mapped type? Revised 4/97 • ) Project/Site: c k,,. ?\,..; • Applicant/owner: — 4 -- e„rf fi Q.,/ / /\cA, v\ VvIcti,,, %A ' Investigator(): 41. vAoe \A VO Date: County: VI v) ek • • • 1\,. S/T/R: IS 173 ,J /Lie Do Nornial Circumstances exist ori the e? (737 Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes - Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Explanation or atypical or:problem area: . _ i no , dr, 42, Community ID: 5 e.„ Transect ID: — - Plot ID: U 6 --- VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; II = herb; V = vine) Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species. riV. ' Akt)5 li.)becA, Go ' 2ColUvq...tAk) CQ.,V2v% ' , ll 20 f(Pi) t ikeokktttl ' S OgOIAIVTAcet,.. 1 ' 10 , 114(34) , . . , . . . .. . , , . , 1 ...... 'IIYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION % of dominants OBL, FACW, Check all indicators that apply Visual observation of plant species areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations ' Technical Literature . INDICATORS & FAC 2/ 3 Physiological/reproductive Wetland ,. adaptations plant database knowledge of regional plant communities (explain) . . . & explain growing below: in X .2C_ Personal ; Other ,_.„ ,, - Hydrophytic vegetation present? , es no . Rationale for decision/Remarks: - .. - . . • . • . . • ' 111rDROLOGY- - • (record temp ex • lain -b - ,.' no . / . . . " 'Is it the.growing season? Based on: soil temp Water Marics: yes no • ' dn Seditnent:Deposits:: yes- no Drift Lines: yes no ' ., Drainage Patterns: yes no . • , .other • ., e Ddlit, of. n II 1 .tiOli: • :Depth to free water in pit: Deptit to saturated soil: Z inches ' Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels <12 in.,yes no ' Local Soil Survey: yes no — 10 inches FAC Neutral: yes no ., Water-stained Leaves : yes. no 0 inches Check all that apply & explain Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial photographs: below: ; Other (explain): // A-..c1/4 : r.)i4 .c.ktin't.tte d iv\ 10 . Other: Wettand 'hydrology present? ) Rationale for decision/Remarks: s no 1 A CAW' ■'''3 _9..),rc-e4 crow\ 6e.e.p6 e,...- 4.pa. kx:e.....V... .. . DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Profile Description ' Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color, (Munsell . moist) moist) Mottle colors (Munsell moist) Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, , structure, etc. ' Drawing iil • -pi oftle' ._.... description); OYe.312 • . i .�A - L)-1(0. ioYn1` -7, 5 - Y f/�p � � 1 ��e -� �il-E I OaW".. ' Hydric Soil Indicators: .Histosol (check all that apply) Odor Moisture Regime Conditions or Low- " a ( =1) matrix ' Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles Concretions Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Streaking in Sandy Soils ;" " National/Local Hydric Soils List in remarks) r Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Sulfidic . High Organic Aquic Organic Reducing Listed on Gleyed Other (explain Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Rem l 1� 01 Co �, J-e8 �i'o,.Je 11. ,' 4 . • • • Wetland Determination (circle) • eg no t no Is the sampling point y es no no within a wetland? • , ..4 Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? Wetland hydrology.present? Rationale/Remar • y 1 V -L V I t tn� �� s,‘ tS @, S Q. knec.V ., Vatoe,,� 1`S �p {�dQ8 . SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomy,(sub&roup) Drainage Class Field observations confirm Yes trapped type? NOTES: Revised 4%97, <'' - Proj ect/Site: 1;6y ct ` ck Inc,..t fc)` e / / S 'Cc,," v , r° a t,h v\., ( ►4o� G.`^ Date: 3 /8) 101- County: K • State: i.,) S/f/R: ( - 1 Z3 W / 4 C Applicant/owner: Je} / Investigator(s): 14,f \< Do Normal .Circumstances exist on the site , yes o Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Is the area a potential' P Problem Area? yes no Explanation of atypical or problem area: Community ID: 5 Transect ID: "...' Plot ID: P D - S U 14- V VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species PA■AyActAuS rt: „ 14 3c) I'Ac • uo \c.n.tus '"A‘.- • Aims fobre... 5 Zv F4t Urtrcc, ci tv s k) C4- p,,12,,, ct e,( .,, gAtui HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION • % of dominants OBL, FACW, Check all indicators that apply Visual observation of plant species areas of:prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature "INDICATORS: & FAC 3 ) Physiological Wetland /reproductive adaptations plant database knowledge of regional plant communities (explain) ' & explain growing below: in �- Personal , Other Hydrophytic vegetation present? "yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 7 ¢' 7. HYDROLOGY yes (record temp n) no ) , Is it•the growing season? Based on soil temp Water Marks: yes no on Sediment Deposits: yes' no ' Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no ... X d ther.(ezpla ,0 Dept. of inundation: Depth to free water in pit: Depth to saturated soil: NKr. inches inches Oxidized Root (live mots) Channels <12 in. yes no Local Soil Survey: yes no , : , . hoho t't>inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water- stained Leaves yes no Check all that apply & explain Stream, Lake orgage data: Aerial photographs: below: : Other: Other (explain): ' R Wetland hydrology present? yes ationale for ddeccision /Remarks: l k L L )5 4'y I no 1 ! `-- t(� c c �e&. .00 oast SGT.0'f4,'t` M1CL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination {WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Cor Wetland Delineation Manual Profile Description • Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix color ' (Mansell moist) Mottle colors ( Munsell moist) *Mottle abundance size & contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. : Drawing of soil :profile ' (match description) . C —L i A ‘loYe3 /z• - s t, . -I6+ l " rk L i � z 2, ;syt 4 / s,• 1 t ! ,-, ` "Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (check all that apply) Odor Moisture Regime Conditions . 9,; ( =1) matrix Matrix chroma 5 2 with mottles Concretions Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Streaking in Sandy Soils National/Local Hydric Soils List \ in remarks): Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Sulfidic High Organic Aquic Organic Reducing Listed" on Oleycd.orLow- Other (explain Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remar yes no • N : .Wetland Determination (circle) no yes no Is the sampling point yes no ; yes no within a wetland? , Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? Wetland hydrology present? Rationale/Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomy , (subgroup) k)rlf` c Vc.A a 1 e Drainage Class Field observations confirm mapped type? NOTES: A 4C4 44._Q \ (irk. `;k \c) to "' p (VS- Revised ,1/970 APPENDIX E: WASHINGTON WETLAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM RATING FORMS Wefilaiad*Unit as Special ' Characteristics ", :'4 `` • Wetland HGM ''CIass`v: • �. • used for Ratin e `' Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake - fringe Mature Forest Slope X Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above X Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Wetland name or number: Wetland A WETLAND RATING FORM — WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 - Updated June 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name of wetland (if known): Wetland A Date of site visit: 03/07 Rated by: Kirk Moughamer Trained by Ecology? Yes X No Date of training: 2/06 SEC: 15 TWNSHP: 23N RNGE: 04W Is S /T /R in Appendix D? Yes No X Map of wetland unit: Figure Estimated size _ 1,347 sq ft Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I II III IV X_ Category I = Category II = Category III Category IV Score > =70 Score 51 -69 = Score 30 -50 = Score < 30 Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington SUMMARY OF RATING Score for Water Quality Functions Score for Hydrologic Functions Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL score for Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I II Does not Apply X Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Version 2 4 3 13 IV , . .Check List for Wetlands: ThatMay Need Additional; Protection . +. C f ',; .. .. ., 5 - h (in a ddition ; twthe protectioifre ,for i ts c .li s . .�:q� SPI. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (T /E species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. X SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 19 of data form). X SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? X SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. X Wetland name or number: Wetland A Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special found in the wetland. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 2 Version 2 Wetland name or number: Wetland A Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO — go to 2 YES — the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES — Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO — Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source ( >90 %) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO — go to 3 YES — The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size; At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? NO — go to 4 YES — The wetland class is Lake - fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _x_The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), _x_The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. _x_The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NO - go to 5 YES — The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 3 Version 2 HGM Classes within the wetland unit:being rated ;, HGM Class Le in Rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake -fringe Lake -fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional + Lake - fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special characteristics Wetland name or number: Wetland A 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO - go to 6 YES — The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO — go to 7 YES — The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO — go to 8 YES — The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1 -7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 4 Version 2 Cn CI C!1 Cl) (I) (see p.64) S 1. Does the wetland unit have the s otential to improve water quality? S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of unit: Slope is l % or less (a 1% slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft horizontal distance) points = 3 Slope is 1% - 2% points = 2 Slope is 2% - 5% points = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 2 S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) YES = 3 points NO = 0 points 0 S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate, for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (> 75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation > 1/2 of area points = 3 Dense, woody, vegetation > 1/2 of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation > 1/4 of area points = 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points = 0 Aerial photo or map with vegetation polygons Figure Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above I I 2 s s S 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? or surface water streams, lakes or conditions from several of wetland (see p.67) multiplier 2 — — Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming sources, but any single source would qual f as opportunity. — Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft — Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland — Tilled fields, logging, or orchards within 150 feet of wetland — Residential, urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S1 by S2 Add score to table on p. 1 4 Wetland name or number: Wetland A Comments Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 5 Version 2 S S S e S 3. Does the wetland unit erosion? have the potential , to reduce flooding and stream b (see p.68) S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland. (stems of'plants should be thick enough (usually > 1 /8in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers > 90% of the area of the wetland. points = 6 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation > 1/2 area of wetland points = 3 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation > 1/4 area points = 1 More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed, tilled or vegetation is not rigid points = 0 3 S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10% of its area. YES points = 2 NO points = 0 o Add the points in the boxes above I i 1 3 S S S 4. Does the wetland have Is the wetland in a landscape helps protect downstream and/or erosive flows? — Wetland has surface problems — Other the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? the reduction in water velocity it provides resources from flooding or excessive conditions apply. to a river or stream that has flooding (seep. 70) multiplier 1 — — position where property and aquatic Note which of the following runoff that drains (Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir (e.g. wetland is a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam) YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 Add score to table on p. 1 3 Wetland name or number: Wetland A Comments Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 6 Version 2 ;t;2, t ,� .. Points � Teseiquestions apply to wetland of all HG classes.. : = p F (only) score HABITATF))UNCTIONS Indtcators that unit functions to provide important habitat y perbox) , rnbFA.4i. H 1. Does the wetland unit have the i otential to provide habitat for many species? -. H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Figure Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)- Size threshold for each class is 1/4 acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. _ Aquatic bed _X_ Emergent plants _X_ Scrub /shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) _ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) If the unit has a forested class check if _The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub - canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss /ground - cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: 4 structures or more points = 4 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 3 structures points = 2 2 structures points = 1 1 structure points = 0 1 H 1.2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73) Figure Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or 1 /4 acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points = 3 p Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points = 2 '_ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point = 1 X_ Saturated only 1 type present points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _ Lake fringe wetland = 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75) 2 Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 f 2 . (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 List species below if you want to: 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 Wetland name or number: Wetland A Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 7 Total for page: 3 Version 2 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats (see p. 76) Figure _ Decide from the diagrams classes (described in H 1.1), mudflats) is high, medium, below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or low, or none. 1 None = 0 points f yY Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points braided [riparian channels] High = 3 points NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always "high ". Use map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (see p. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. _X_Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland ( >4in. diameter and 6 ft long). _X_Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (1m) over a stream (l Om) (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft 2 Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning ( >30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) At least 1 /4 acre of thin- stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(structures for egg - laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20% stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. H 1. TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat II 3 Add the scores from H1.1, H1.2, H1.3, H1.4, H1.5 ! J Wetland name or number: Wetland A Comments Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 8 Version 2 H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed" — 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no- grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5 — 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference. Points = 4 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points = 4 — 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points = 3 3 X 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference. Points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 — No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points =1 — Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = 0 — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (see p. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES = 4 points (go to H2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake - fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? 1 YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture ( >40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES = 1 point NO = 0 points Wetland name or number: Wetland A Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 9 Total for page: 4 Version 2 Wetland name or number: Wetland A H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see p. 82) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. These are DFW definitions. Check with your local DFW biologist if there are any questions. Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres). Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. Old - growth forests: (Old- growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees /acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100 %; crown cover may be less that 100 %; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old - growth; 80 - 200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 m (0.5 - 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25 %. Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi - enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low- energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean - derived salts measure less than 0.5ppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat = point No habitats = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) 0 Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 10 Version 2 H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that 3 best fits) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development. points = 5 The wetland is Lake - fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within 'h mile points = 5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within '/2 mile, BUT the connections between them are disturbed points = 3 The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other Lake- fringe wetland within '/z mile points = 3 There is at least 1 wetland within 1/2 mile. points = 2 There are no wetlands within '/2 mile. points = 0 H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 1 1 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 6 Total Score for Habitat Functions — add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on p. 1 13 Wetland name or number: Wetland A Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 11 Version 2 Wetland name or number: Wetland A CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Ty Check off any criteria that apply appropriate criteria are met! SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (see p. 86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated, and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES = Go to SC 1.1 NO x SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332 -30 -151? YES = Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II — The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non - native plant species. If the non - native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual rating (I /II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. At least 3 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un -mowed grassland. The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Cat. I Cat. 1 Cat. II Dual rating I /II Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 12 Version 2 Wetland name or number: Wetland A SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township /Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP /DNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D or accessed from WNI- IP/DNR web site _X_ YES — contact WNHP /DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 3.2 NO _X SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES = Category .I NO _X_ ._ ..a 4,4" SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes - gotoQ.3 No -go to Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes - go to Q. 3 No - Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes — Is a bog for purpose of rating No - go to Q. 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 1. is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub /herbaceous cover)? 2. YES = Category I No X_ Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat. I Cat. I Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 13 Version 2 T -" . _ n. s7 i.n .' c`?{*pt. "Nt:Ltif eTe otz -.ti,E:<SY4„w=—x- i -:.c: 8 n.:.. . SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (see p. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. — Old growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees /acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two - hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old -growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. — Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 — 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100 %; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old- growth. Cat. 1 YES = Category 1 NO _ SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks — The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO _ X _ not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? — The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). — At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un -grazed or un -mowed grassland. Cat. 1 — The wetland is larger than 1 /10 acre (4350 square feet) YES = Category I NO = Category 11 Cat. 11 Wetland name or number: Wetland A Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 14 Version 2 Wetland name or number: Wetland A SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (see p. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES - go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula- lands west of SR 103 • Grayland- Westport- lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores - Copalis- lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES = Category II NO — go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Wetland Rating Form — Western Washington 15 Version 2 Cat. II Cat. III • • Subject: Technical Information Report (TIR) for Jeffery Foley 4 -Lot Residential Short Plat 14011 Macadam Road S. Tukwila, WA 98168 R f (Tukwila, WA) 01 '1 ri 1 July 26, 2007 Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer/Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same aeXPIRES : 4,1124V O ZG 77/ 1- ( -7 CONtiio,u+`4l i Y DEVELOPMENT 1 Project Overview: • • Table of Contents: Project Overview Conditions and Requirements Summery Off Site Analysis Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design Conveyance System Analysis and Design Special Reports and Studies Other Permits ESC Analysis and Design Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries and Declarations of Covenant Operations Manual The purpose of this report is to evaluate the soils on the above property for suitability for on -site infiltration, sizing of a detention system as required, and stability and erosion characteristics. The parcel is approximately 71,180 square feet or 1.68 acres, with an existing one story wood frame residence, driveway and surrounding lawn with landscaping shrubs and small trees. The existing house is approximately 90 years old, and will be retained. In addition, a fairly large wood frame bam and graveled parking area exist on the site. The bam will also be retained and remodeled as a new residence. The lot is bordered on all sides by single family residences, some with.,larger parcels. It is located on the west side of Macadam Road S. in Tukwila, WA. The street address of the existing residence is 14011 Macadam Road S. The site slopes significantly downward to the east and Macadam Road S., with the western one -half being wooded with slopes of typically 2:1, with the eastern one -half being a cleared series of graveled parking areas, buildings and (awned yard areas. This report will evaluate the suitability of the site for on -site infiltration relating to future residential development. Based on the soils available in the lower elevations of the site (see Logs #4, 5 and 6), the site is suitable for on -site infiltration. A common main trench will be used for all impervious areas on site, including residences. Design details are given below. Based on the topography of the site, significant earthwork will be required to create the new access road into the site from Macadam Road S. The existing residence and barn will be retained for continued use. The existing graveled driveway and parking areas will be displaced for the new access road and residences. The existing lot coverage is as follows: Total lot area 73,180 SF 2 Existing Conditions Residence 1,530 SF Barn 1,008 SF Driveway 1,800 SF Parking area 9,450 SF Total 13,788 SF Area of wooded hillside 36,900 SF Net lawn area 22,492 SF Future conditions Residence (ex) Residence (barn) Driveways for above New residences, 2 ea. Access road (new) 1,530 SF 1,008 SF 1,000 SF (est.) 8,000 SF 4,800 SF Total 15,538 SF • • Note that some areas of the site will not be directed into the site's storm system due to topography. The western hillside vegetation will be unchanged, and any new impervious areas generated will come from the existing (awned areas. Upon completion of the short plat and residential construction, all impervious areas will be captured and directed to the site's storm system. The resulting managed flows will result in a net decrease of runoff from the site, whether runoff is infiltrated or detained and released to the adjacent street system. As such, the sizing of the site's storm system may be considered inherently conservative. The net additional full development vehicular impervious surface area is estimated to be 1,700 square feet, which will not require formal water quality measures as it does not exceed the 2,000 square foot threshold. Drainage measures will use the KCRTS methodology due to the total future impervious areas. Erosion and sediment control measures will be use the Small Site Criteria of the KCSWM Manual Appendix C methodology. There are identified steep slopes and wetlands associated with this project. Conditions and Requirements Summery: Core Requirements from the current KCSWM Manual are discussed within this report at appropriate sections. The Core Requirements will be identified by number and title. The first is Core Requirement #1, Discharge at a Natural Location. This requirement is met by the use of on site infiltration for runoff from all future impervious areas on site. The KCSWM Manual requires infiltration where feasible. Soil studies of the site indicate infiltration is feasible for disposing 3 Off Site Analysis: • • of flows collected from all full development impervious surfaces. Infiltration rates for soils at depths of approximately 3 to 5 feet were found to be 15 to 20 minutes per inch. A rate of 20 minutes per inch will be used, with an additional safety factor of 2.0, giving a design rate of 40 minutes per inch. Overflow to the existing street system is provided. Since the full development net new impervious area is greater than 2,000 square feet, a Level 1 Drainage Review is required. This review requires a formal Technical Information Review (this document). The design storm used is the 100 -year event. The sizing is done using the "black box" KCRTS computer modeling program. Calculations are attached. The calculations and conceptual design include considerations for the roof area of the new residences, and the new access road. This section discusses Core Requirement #2, Off Site Analysis. Since all runoff collected from equivalent new impervious surfaces is infiltrated on site, no off site analysis would usually be required. However, a walking tour of the site and adjacent downhill properties and rights -of -way found no apparent existing drainage problems. Note that the infiltration of all future impervious surfaces will in fact reduce the surface runoff leaving the site. A full one - quarter mile distance from the site was investigated. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design: This section discusses Core Requirement #3, Flow Control. As discussed above, all or most of the runoff generated by new impervious surfaces on the site will be infiltrated. A common trench will be used. Impervious area for the two new residences is estimated conservatively at 4,000 SF per residence. The infiltration trench is sized by KCRTS using a 100 year storm event. The soils found on site were silty loams. No water was found in any of the test holes. A minimum percolation rate of 20 minutes per inch was found at depths of 3 to 5 feet. With a safety factor of 2.0, the design infiltration rate of 40 minutes per inch is used. As noted above, overflow is provided to the street system. An impervious surface area of 15,538 square feet, or 0.357 acres, is used for the KCRTS calculations. Attached are calculations for sizing the common trench. The dimensions of the calculated trench are 6 feet deep by 15.3 feet wide by 80 feet long. The following discusses Core' Requirement #8, Water Quality. 4 • • Since the net new impervious vehicular surface area is Tess than 2,000 square feet greater than the existing, water quality measures are limited to tees in the system's catch basins. Conveyance System Analysis and Design: This section discusses Core Requirement #4, Conveyance System. Due to the short nature of the drainage lines serving the infiltration trenches, the lines capacity are considered adequate by inspection. Special Reports and Studies: Wetland and Watercourse Reconnaissance, David Evans and Associates, March 15, 2007 Other Permits: Residential permits will be required for the construction /remodel of new and existing residences. ESC Analysis and Design: This section discusses Core Requirement #5, Erosion and Sediment Control. As noted above, the ESC measures required for this site will consist of a stabilized construction entrance and down slope silt fencing. Criteria will be per Appendix C. Specific placement will be determined at the time of residential construction. Bond Quantities, Facility Summery and Declarations of Covenant: This section discusses Core Requirement #7, Financial Guarantees and Liability. A City of Tukwila cost estimate form is provided as an attachment to this TIR. Operation and Maintenance Manual This section discusses Core Requirement #6, Operation and Maintenance. An Operation and Maintenance Manual for the infiltration system will be provided at the time of permit/occupandy. 5 Bruce S. MacVeig , P.E. Civil Engineer Questions relating to this report may be directed to this office. • • foleysptir/061 9 6 D c 0 a E w O r U C c En O zw OC w J 0 (i) ZG '2-45' SP /.46/L r i 17/0 /YC4 / S's ' /•Y4 A o .-z ?//2 /n' -,e,Z 4 7/ £sue ; /S; 8 o, 35 7 .7 . 2 .ev et, $_p = °toe? //e- c , r 4' JA vs hrs. AR/. '/e Zoe. ,P o 44 /,✓e- k �- gja f /p'- 7 Z I Gv!e 6,/,1"/ . 22 (5 /i ( 7s ; • V&s - /i,' L /4GC.✓ 5 /A/ 71X-6 L %.10,E' /, PM> ff e $ce'#ia :' 'iv /0/I , r/4,E /4P4 s'E. /1 T!A 1 ij 'a 5; I.) 7,g/ 7C a .5":t , /a . /I 07 , ' ° 21, 60o 0,44pg /L.�s -r dv�4.44. ./ Sr 7 STAEDTLER® No. 937 811E Engineers Computation Pad 5.2600 5.3600 5.4600 5.5600 5.6600 5.7600 5.8600 5.9600 6.0000 6.1000 6.2000 6.3000 6.4000 6.5000 6.6000 6.7000 6.8000 6.9000 7.0000 7.1000 7.2000 7.3000 7.4000 7.5000 7.6000 7.7000 7.8000 7.9000 8.0000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.308 0.871 1.60 2.39 2.67 2.93 3.16 3.38 3.59 3.78 3.97 4.14 4.31 4.47 4.63 4.78 4.93 5.07 5.21 5.35 • • 1934.0 1970.8 2007.5 2044.3 2081.1 2117.8 2154.6 2191.4 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 2206.1 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225. 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 1225.6 0.00 Base Facility Elevation 40.0 Minutes /Inch: Average Perm -Rate 64 Facility Type 6.00000 Depth (ft) 0.00000 Slope - Horizontal Component - 1.00000 Tank Diameter /Rise (ft) 0 Number of Orifices 6.00000 Riser Head (ft) 12.0000 Riser Diameter (in) F Bottom Permeable (logical) F Sides Permeable (logical) F Notched riser (logical) T Triangular Notch (logical) - 1.00000 Notch width (in) - 1.00000 Notch angle (degrees) (specify) riser ouflow rating curve filename 612.800 Facility Length (ft) 1225.60 Facility Bottom Area (sq ft) 0 Primary Hydrograph dev.tsf Hydrograph & inflow TS file rdout.tsf outflow TS file 7 Year 2411 Hour 0.00000 Target peak discharge rate 5 Year 2638 Hour - 0.999990E +15 Target peak discharge rate 3/7 • R/D Facility Definition File Stage Discharge Storage Perm -Area (Ft) (CFS) (Cu -Ft) (Sq -Ft) 0.0000 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0600 0.000 22.1 1225.6 0.1600 0.000 58.8 1225.6 0.2600 0.000 95.6 1225.6 0.3600 0.000 132.4 1225.6 0.4600 0.000 169.1 1225.6 0.5600 0.000 205.9 1225.6 0.6600 0.000 242.7 1225.6 0.7600 0.000 279.4 1225.6 0.8600 0.000 316.2 1225.6 0.9600 0.000 353.0 1225.6 1.0600 0.000 389.7 1225.6 1.1600 0.000 426.5 1225.6 1.2600 0.000 463.3 1225.6 1.3600 0.000 500.0 1225.6 1.4600 0.000 536.8 1225.6 1.5600 0.000 573.6 1225.6 1.6600 0.000 610.3 1225.6 1.7600 0.000 647.1 1225.6 1.8600 0.000 683.9 1225.6 1.9600 0.000 720.7 1225.6 2.0600 0.000 757.4 1225.6 2.1600 0.000 794.2 1225.6 2.2600 0.000 831.0 1225.6 2.3600 0.000 867.7 1225.6 2.4600 0.000 904.5 1225.6 2.5600 0.000 941.3 1225.6 2.6600 0.000 978.0 1225.6 2.7600 0.000 1014.8 1225.6 2.8600 0.000 1051.6 1225.6 2.9600 0.000 1088.3 1225.6 3.0600 0.000 1125.1 1225.6 3.1600 0.000 1161.9 1225.6 3.2600 0.000 1198.6 1225.6 3.3600 0.000 1235.4 1225.6 3.4600 0.000 1272.2 1225.6 3.5600 0.000 1308.9 1225.6 3.6600 0.000 1345.7 1225.6 3.7600 0.000 1382.5 1225.6 3.8600 0.000 1419.2 1225.6 3.9600 0.000 1456.0 1225.6 4.0600 0.000 1492.8 1225.6 4.1600 0.000 1529.5 1225.6 4.2600 0.000 1566.3 1225.6 4.3600 0.000 1603.1 1225.6 4.4600 0.000 1639.9 1225.6 4.5600 0.000 1676.6 1225.6 4.6600 0.000 1713.4 1225.6 4.7600 0.000 1750.2 1225.6 4.8600 0.000 1786.9 1225.6 4.9600 0.000 1823.7 1225.6 5.0600 0.000 1860.5 1225.6 5.1600 0.000 1897.2 1225.6 Time Series File •dev.tsf Project Location. Sea -Tac - -- Annual Peak Flow Rates-- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.090 6 2/09/01 2.00 0.076 8 1/08/02 16:00 0.107 3 2/27/03 7:00 0 -089 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.106 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.092 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.130 2 10=26/06 0:00 0.175 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks • Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Frequency Analysis - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.178 1 100.00 0.990 0 130 2 25.00 0.960 0.107 3 10.00 0.900 0.106 4 5.00 0.800 0.092 5 3.00 0.667 0.090 6 2.00 0.500 0.089 7 1.30 0.231 0.076 8 1 10 0.091 0.160 50.00 0.980 • Sf7 • • lrffgfwqrwzc ran Or6, A rea , Till Forest, 0.00 acres; Till Pasture: 0.00 acres Till Grass. 0.00 acres! Outwash Forest 0.50 acres' Outwash Pasture 0.00 acres Outwash Grass 0.08 acres Wet Ian& 0.00 acres! Impervious 0.36 acres' -Total - 0.94 acres' Scale Factor : 1.00 Hourly Reduced Time Series: dev Compute Time Series Modify User Input File for computed Time Series I.TSFI '77 r and Use Type -Time Step ---- --- - - Hourly Data Type -_.._. . 6' Reduced Till Forest Till Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Outwash Grass Wetland Impervious Scale Factor r 15- minute Historic Compute Total Area Area (acres)! 10.0 (0.000 10.496 10. (0. 10.357 11.000 Enter area for this land use type, 0.0 if NONE • • • Operation and Maintenance Manual for Stormwater Collection and Infiltration System (Private System) Foley 4 -Lot Residential Short Plat 14011 Macadam Road S. Tukwila, WA Table of Contents: Operations of System Inspection Checklist July 26, 2007 Prepared by Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geotechnical 14245 59 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same COlvuoiu.vi 1 ' DEVELOPMENT • • Operation and Maintenance of Short Plat Storm System This entire drainage system is located within the private access and utilities easement located within the boundaries of this short plat. The operation of the common portions of the system is generally simple and requires only occasional inspections and maintenance procedures. These items are the joint responsibility of the owners of the four lots within the short plat. The system consists of two Type 2 catch basins of 48 inch diameter located in the above easement and Tying within the private roadway. Between them is an 80 foot long gravel infiltration trench, with a 6 inch diameter perforated pipe connecting the two catch basins, and running through the trench. The gravel in the trench is 6 feet deep and 15.3 feet wide. A 6 inch over flow line runs from the lower catch basin to the ditch in front of the property, and relieves water in the trench during very heavy storm events. An important periodic inspection is of the large catch basins with the their tee outlets. Regularly, according the to attached checklists, the catch basins should be opened and inspected. The tees should be in place, and the sumps should not have significant collections of silt. Floating debris and oils should be checked. Should significant silts (one foot or'more at the bottom of the catch basin) or significant floating debris or oils be found, a commercial "vactor" truck will have to be contracted to remove the material. Attached within this manual is the detailed set of checklists with scheduling and maintenance requirements for all portions of the common drainage system. Questions about inspection and maintenance of this facility may be directed to the Public Works Department of the City of Tukwila. foleyonm0l /0619 S: 4/24/ Ca7 Z TAG ' v7 • • INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF MAINTENANCE CHECKLISTS The following pages contain maintenance needs for most of the components that are part of your drainage system, as well as for some components that you may not have. Ignore the requirements that do not apply to your system. You should plan to complete a checklist for all system components on the following schedule: 1. Monthly from November through April 2. Once in late summer (preferable September) 3. After any major storm (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline), items marked "S" only. Using photocopies of these pages, check off the problems you looked for each time you did an inspection. Add comments on problems found and actions taken. Keep these "checked" sheets in your files. Some items do not need to be looked at every time an inspection is done. Use the suggested frequency at the left of each item as a guideline for your inspection. • • REQUIRED ACTIONS: The following actions shall be taken to ensure that pollution generated on site shall be minimized: 1. Warning signs (e.g., "Dump No Waste - Drains to Stream ") shall be painted or embossed on or adjacent to all storm drain inlets. They shall be repainted as needed. Contact the Municipality regarding availability of stenciling supplies. 2. Parking Tots shall be swept when necessary to remove debris and, at a minimum, twice a year. Use of newer model high - velocity vacuum sweepers is recommended as they are more effective in removing the more harmful smaller particles from paved surfaces. 3. Sediment removed from detention vaults shall be disposed of in a proper manner. Contact the Municipality for instruction prior to completing this task. 4. No activities shall be conducted on site that are likely to result in short-term high - concentration discharge of pollution to the stormwater system. Such activities may include, but not be limited to, vehicle washing, vehicle maintenance, and cleaning of equipment used in the periodic maintenance of buildings and paved surfaces. Frequency Drainage System Feature / Problem Conditions To Check For Conditions That Should Exi M.S. General Trash, debris, and sediment in or on basin Trash or debris in front of the catch basin opening is blocking capacity by more than 10% No trash or debris located immediately '. front of catch basin opening. Grate is kept clean and allows water to enter. M Sediment or debris (rn the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. No sediment or debris in the catch basin Catch basin is dug out and clean. . M,S • Trash or debris in any inlet or pipe blocking more than 1/3 of its height. Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris. M . . , Structural damage to frame and/or top slab Corner of frame extends more than 3/4 inch past curb face into the street (if applicable). Frame is even with curb. ' M • ' Top stab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into the basin). Top stab is free of holes and cracks. M Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Frame is sitting flush on top slab. A . . Cracks in basin walls/bottom • Cracks wider than 12 inch and longer than3 feet, any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks, or . maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. Contact a professional engineer for evaluation. A Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer • than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through crack. No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the joint of inlet/outlet pipe. Contact a professional engineer for evaluation. A Settlement/ misalignment Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment Basin replaced or repaired to desig n standards. Contact a professional engineer for evaluation. M,S . Fire hazard or other pollution Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil, and gasoline. Obnoxious color, odor, or sludge noted. No color, odor, or sludge. Basin is dug out and clean. M,S Outlet pipe is clogged with vegetation Vegetation or roots growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that is more than sac inches tall and less than six inches aaart. No vegetation or root growth present ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Catch Basins and Inlets If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: Key: • A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S =After major storms (use 1 -inch jn 24 hours as a guideline) • • ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Infiltration Systems • If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S=After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) Frequency Stem Feature / Problem Conditions to Check For Conditions That Shoukt Frost M,S General Trash 8 debris buildup in pond See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M Poisonous vegetation . See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M,S Fire hazard or pollution See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M Vegetation not growing or is overgrown • See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M Rodent holes See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. M Insects See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. See Maintenance Checklist for Ponds. A Storage area • Sediment buildup in system A sail texture test indicates facility is not working at its designed capabi flies or was incorrectly designed. Sediment is removed and/or faciiy is cleaned so that infiltration system works according to design. A sediment trapping area is installed to reduce sediment transport into infiltration area A Storage area drains slowly (more than 48 hours) or overflows . A soil texture test indicates ..facility is not working at its designed capabilities or was incorrectly designed. Additional volume is added through excavation to provide needed storage. S' is aerated and rotoblled to improve drainage. Contact the Municipality for information on its requirements regarding excavation. M • Sediment trapping area Any sediment anddebris filling area to 10% of depth from sump bottom to bottom of outlet pipe or obstructing flow into the connector pipe. Clean out sump to design depth. • One Time Sediment trapping area not pry Stonmwrater enters infiltration area directly without treatment Add a trapping area by constructing a sump for settling of solids. Segregate settling area from rest of facility. Contact the Municipality for guidance. M Rock filters Sediment and debris } By visual inspection tittle or no water flows through fitter during heavy rain storms. Replace gravel in rock filter. • ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Infiltration Systems • If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S=After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) • • ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Conveyance Systems (Pipes, Ditches, and Swales) Frequency Drainage Feature Conditions to Check For Conditions That Should Fast M,S Pipes Sediment & debris Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. M Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movernent of water through pipes. All vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. A Damaged (rusted. bent, or shed) Protective coating is damaged: rust is causing more than 50% deterioration to any part of pipe. Pipe repaired or replaced. M • dent that significantly Any Sig icantty impedes flow (i.e. decreases the cross section area of pipe by more than 20%). Pipe repaired or replaced. M Pipe has major cracks or tears allowing groundwater leakage. Pipe repaired or replaced. M,S Open ditches Trash & debris Dumping of yard wastes such as grass cppings and branches into basin. Unsightly accumulation of nondegradable materials such as glass, plastic, metal. foam, and coated paper. Remove trash and debris and dispose as prescribed by the Municipality. M Sediment buildup Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth. Ditch cleaned of all sediment and - ._ debris so that it matches design. A • Vegetation Vegelatiori (e.g., weedy shrubs or saplings) that reduces free movements of water through ditches. Water flows freely through ditches. Grassy vegetation should be left alone. M Erosion damage to slopes See Ponds Checldist. See Ponds Checklist A Rock fining out of place or missing (f applicable) Maintenance beneath the r ode see native soil Replace rocks to design standard. Vanes Catch basins See Catch Basins Checidrst. See Catch Basins Checidest. M,S Swales Trash & debris See above for Ditches. See above for Ditches. M Sediment buildup See above for Ditches. Vegetation eg may need to be reptarrtec after cleaning. M Vegetation not growing or • overgrown Grass cover is sparse and seedy or areas are overgrown with woody vegetation. Aerate sods and reseed and mulch bare areas. Maintain grass height a a minimum of 6 inches for best stormwrater treatment Remove woody growth, recontour, and reseed as necessary. M,S Erosion damage to slopes See Ponds Checid�st. See Ponds Checklist. M Conversion by homeowner to incompatible use Swale has been filed in or blocked by shed, woodpile, shrubbery, etc. If possible. speak with homeowner and request that Swale area be restored. Contact the Municipality to report problem if not rectified gib. • • ATTACHMENT "A" (CONTINUED) Maintenance Checklist for Conveyance Systems (Pipes, Ditches, and Swales) A Swale does not drain Water stands in Swale or flow velocity is very stow. Stagnation occurs. A survey may be needed to check grades. Grades need to be in 1-5% range if possible. If grade is less than 1% underdrains may need to be installed. If you are unsure whether a problem exists, please contact a Professional Engineer. Comments: Key: A= Annual (March or April preferred) M= Monthly (see schedule) S =After major storms (use 1 -inch in 24 hours as a guideline) FP a StiO iLl PIA r HA1uN4 TENANT 120 SW 194TH ST NORMANDY PARK, WA 98166 CLENNA,RHONDA S 13765 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE, WA 98168 MILLER,STEVEN E TRUST 13 811 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 QURESHI,MUMTAZ A 13827 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 FORHAN,TIMOTHY W & ALICE F 14003 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE, WA 98168 LORENZEN,ROGER S ETAL 14038 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 14314 48TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 TENANT 308 140TH ST SW EVERETT, WA 98208 TENANT 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE, WA 98104 GOSS,GERRILYNN 4525 S 139TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 • TENANT 12813 53RD DR SE EVERETT, WA 98208 TENANT 13765 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE, WA 98168 SANDHU,SUKHCHAIN S 13815 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 PARAGAS,ERNESTO & ALICE 13837 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 MERYHEW,SARAH 14006 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 CORP CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP 14120 S 44TH AVE TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 18014 NE 125TH ST REDMOND, WA 98052 TENANT 314E MERCER ST 101 SEATTLE, WA 98102 TENANT 405 S 3RD ST YAKIMA, WA 98901 HUREMOVIC,JAKUB & SUADA 4526 S 140TH ST SEATAC, WA 98168 BUDINICH,VALERIE D 13757 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 DAVIS,THELMA 13806 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 QURAISHI,A RASHID & W ANJUM 13821 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 BAGBY,FRED E 13925 51ST AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 FOLEY,JEFFREY R & HARMONY J 14011 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 RIVAS,ALFREDO 14239 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 19225 102ND AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 TENANT 4008 W LAKE SAMMAMISH PKWY NE D6 REDMOND, WA 98052. TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT 4242 S 144TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 GRIFFITH,ANNE PATRICIA 4529 S 140TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98168 RUPP,ELEANOR A 4611 S 140TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98168 TENANT 4640 S 144TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 8529 W 20TH STCT TACOMA, WA 98466 TENANT PO BOX 69043 SEATTLE, WA 98168 CENTRA TUKWILA, NAL TUKWIL • , A SCO TUKWI W WA HN SOUND RTA "ANTORA,EVELYN P ETAL 4617 S 140TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98168 SCOONES,MICHAEL 4710 S 144TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 910 MARION ST SEATTLE, WA 98104 BAUMAN,J REY R TUKWI , WA GRIFI\TH,DEARL & ANNE PATRI RUST TUKWILA, WA ROSI TU IIL•,WA g EISHMAN,JERRY 4627 S 140TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 SINGH,HARCHAND 4823 S 138TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 9813 23RD AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 98117 BE M,J TUK A, WA LEI TU ;JERRY ,WA PUG OUND TRAN AUTH TU IL , WA TENANT 120 SW 194TH ST NORMANDY PARK, WA 98166 CLENNA,RHONDA S 13765 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE, WA 98168 MILLER,STEVEN E TRUST 13811 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 QURESHI,MUMTAZ A 13827 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 FORHAN,TIMOTHY W & ALICE F 14003 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE, WA 98168 LORENZEN,ROGER S ETAL 14038 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 14314 48TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 TENANT 308 140TH ST SW EVERETT, WA 98208 TENANT 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE, WA 98104 GOSS,GERRILYNN 4525 S 139TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 • TENANT 12813 53RD DR SE EVERETT, WA 98208 TENANT 13765 MACADAM RD S SEATTLE, WA 98168 SANDHU,SUKHCHAIN S 13 815 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 PARAGAS,ERNESTO & ALICE 13837 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 MERYHEW,SARAH 14006 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 CORP CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP 14120 S 44TH AVE TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 18014 NE 125TH ST REDMOND, WA 98052 TENANT 314 E MERCER ST 101 SEATTLE, WA 98102 TENANT 405 S 3RD ST YAKIMA, WA 98901 HUREMOVIC,JAKUB & SUADA 4526 S 140TH ST SEATAC, WA 98168 BUDINICH,VALERIE D 13757 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 DAVIS,THELMA 13806 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 QURAISHI,A RASHID & W ANJUM 13 821 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 BAGBY,FRED E 13925 51ST AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 FOLEY,JEFFREY R & HARMONY J 14011 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 RIVAS,ALFREDO 14239 MACADAM RD S TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 19225 102ND AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 TENANT 4008 W LAKE SAMMAMISH PKWY NE D6 REDMOND, WA 98052 TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT 4242 S 144TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 GRIFFITH,ANNE PATRICIA 4529 S 140TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98168 UPP,ELEANOR A 611 S 140TH ST EATTLE, WA 98168 'ENANT 640 S 144TH ST 1 JKWILA, WA 98168 'ENANT X529 W 20TH STCT 'ACOMA, WA 98466 ['ENANT ?O BOX 69043 SEATTLE, WA 98168 CENTRAL PUGET SOUND RTA TUKWILA, WA NALEWAJEK,JOHN TUKWILA, WA SCOONES,M W TUKWILA, WA • SANTORA,EVELYN P ETAL 4617 S 140TH ST SEATTLE, WA 98168 SCOONES,MICHAEL 4710 S 144TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 910 MARION ST SEATTLE, WA 98104 BAUMAN,JEFFREY R TUKWILA, WA GRIFFITH,DEARL & ANNE PATRIC TRUST TUKWILA, WA PARAGAS,ERNESTO & ALICE TUKWILA, WA SCOONES,MICHAEL W & ROSITA M TUKWILA, WA • LEISHMAN,JERRY 4627 S 140TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 SINGH,HARCHAND 4823 S 138TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 9813 23RD AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 98117 BEAHM,JON B TUKWILA, WA LEISHMAN,JERRY TUKWILA, WA PUGET SOUND TRAN AUTH TUKWILA, WA • PLOT FLis.ki Tiff " .. RECEIVED [JAN 1 7 2007 Parcel No.: 1523049035 Address: 14011 MACADAM RD S TUKW Suite No: Applicant: JEFF FOLEY Receipt No.: R07 -00064 Initials: RF User ID: 1683 Payee: payment for short subdivision application ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description ZONING /SUBDIVISION • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us RECEIPT TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 3501 585.00 Account Code Current Pmts 000/345.810 585.00 Total: $585.00 Permit Number: L07 -001 Status: PENDING Applied Date: 01/17 /2007 Issue Date: Payment Amount: $585.00 Payment Date: 01/17/2007 09:32 AM Balance: $0.00 n.:..a..41• n4 47 nnn7 November 12, 2006 Dear Sir: GA L . ....-a . MacVeigh, .E. Civil Engineer • EXPIRES: 4/24/ Q om._... Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer /Small Site Geote clinical 14245 59 Ave. S., Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 Fax: Same City of Tukwila Attn: Planning Department Subject: Soils Evaluation for On -Site Storm Infiltration, Jeff Foley /Sharon Mann 4 -Lot Short Plat, 14011 Macadam Road S., Tukwila, WA On July 28, 2006 a total of six soil logs were evaluated on the above site. Attached is a copy of the soil logs. The soils encountered typically had a surface layer of medium loam untlerlain by mottled sandy clay, typical of what is probably the Alderwood Association. The depth of the loam down to the clay varied from 24 to 96 inches. The use of on -site infiltration for the above site is not recommended. Several reasons are: 1. The depth of the loam varies widely and is not predictable in depth for designing trenches, especially for sites with area restraints. 2. The loam itself does not infiltrate well. 3. The build up of groundwater above the clay layer could saturate soil needed for water removal from the trenches. 4. The proximity of the embankment along side Macadam Road S. indicates that it is better to de -water the soils in the embankment than to add groundwater. 5. Soils from the slope above the useful part of the site perch groundwater. As • mentioned, it is better to de -water the soils of the site in the buildable area so that any perched water will have minimal affect. In summery, the use of on -site infiltration for stormwater removal is not recommended for this site. Instead, conventional underground detention is recommended, with release of the existing roadside system. Note that while this letter does not address other engineering aspects of the soils of the site, it may be mentioned that the soils do appear suitable for conventional paving and building construction. Questions relating to the above maybe made directly to this office. "SAN 1 ?fluj D 'vELOPApLN • SOIL LOGS FOLEY /MANN SHORT PLAT 28 JUL 06 SL 1 0 -96" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 96- 120 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 2 0 -84" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 84 -96 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 3 0 -24" MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES 24 -72 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 4 0 -72 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 5 0 -96 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 6 0 -48 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) • JAN i 7 2001 aizT EXECUTED at 1701 • 6f 6!/.,O- • AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, en ineers, contractors or oth repgresentativf� tae ri h to enter upon Owner's real property, located at /W.? 1/ QC /o/ Cc 01 /Cd for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. Print Name Address Phone Number Signature On this day personally appeared before me—IC dc' 7U / y to me known to be e individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that Ife /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS eev ICLPE7* I II E J •;••Ni5N F ,•; ' o � `� N t,OT '';1'�y 9 R , CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tukplan @.ci.tukwila.wa.us residing at ss • RECEIVED 1 JAN 17 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMF_NT (city), !/" /g (state), on A U e /17e !> , 20 tP J P /re y ,06„z o / y /R d �' . ) /9 1 ,I/O /,n i�c,/ j �� . /e/// 9 ?/6 6 4 &- 779- 7�/ _ NOTARY P 7 jYriF / UPI�hlOwl/ 20O ' a State o as ington r % r Ll _ k3 - O 7 My Commission expires on Page 1 • Figure Name: FULL PARCEL Course: S 87 -04 -36 W Course: S 01 -30 -54 W Course: S 87 -48 -48 E Course: N 08 -30 -34 W Perimeter: 1127.90 Area: 71545.44 Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed Error of Closure: 0.001 Precision 1: 788098.88 Figure Name: LOT 1 Course: N 87 -04 -36 E Course: S 08 -30 -34 E Course: S 87 -04 -36 W Course: N 08 -30 -34 W Perimeter: 382.54 Area: 8859.59 Closure - (Uses listed Closure: 0.002 Mapcheck Error of Precision 1: 236375.60 Figure Name: LOT 2 Course: N Course: S Course: S Course: N 87 -04 -36 08 -30 -34 87 -04 -36 01 -30 -54 E E W E Perimeter: 652.05 Area: 19594.64 Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed Error of Closure: 0.011 Precision 1: 60929.64 Figure Name: LOT 3 Course: N 87 -04 -36 E Course: S 02 -11 -12 W Course: N 87 -48 -48 W Course: N 01 -30 -54 E Perimeter: 738.72 Area: 28454.35 Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed Error of Closure: 0.005 Precision 1: 158715.46 PROJECT: 06143 courses & COGO Course: courses & COGO Course: Distance: 350.38 Distance: 178.10 Distance: 386.43 Distance: 212.99 Distance: Distance: Distance: Distance: 1.64 acres Units) N 47 -59 -46 E 111.27 80.00 111.27 80.00 Distance: 239.11 Distance: 80.00 Distance: 253.07 Distance: 79.87 • 0.20 acres Units) N 02 -55 -22 W 0.45 acres courses & COGO Units) Course: S 46 -44 -45 W Distance: 260.62 Distance: 121.44 Distance: 258.43 Distance: 98.23 0.65 acres courses & COGO Units) Course: N 32 -50 -15 W RECEIVED JAN 17 20071 CUiriMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Figure Name: LOT 4 Course: N 87 -04 -36 E Course: S 08 -30 -34 E Course: N 87 -48 -48 W Course: N 02 -11 -12 E Per 486.16 Area: 14636.87 Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed Error of Closure: .0001 Precision 1: 663464.94 Mapcheck Error of Figure Name: EASEMENT Course: N 87 -04 -36 E Course: S 08 -30 -34 E Course: S 87 -04 -36 W Arc Length: 29.63 Course: S 02 -11 -12 W Course: S 87 -04 -36 W Course: N 02 -11 -12 E Arc Length: 33.20 Course: S 87 -04 -36 W Course: N 02 -11 -12 E Perimeter: 494.93 Area: 4897.28 Closure - (Uses listed Closure: 0.009 Precision 1: 54833.21 • Distance: Distance: Distance: Distance: 103.73 132.99 128.00 121.44 Distance: 168.99 Distance: 20.10 Distance: 79.14 Radius: 20.00 Distance: 46.97 Distance: 20.08 Distance: 43.39 Radius: 20.00 Distance: 33.35 Distance: 20.08 • 0.34 acres courses & COGO Units) Course: N 62 -28 -46 W 0.11 acres courses & COGO Units) Course: N 37 -52 -03 W RECEIVED IJAN 1 71001 DEEVELOPME ApN7' Delta: - 84 -53 -24 Delta: - 95 -06 -36 ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY ICING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 125 The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Certificate of Availability ( "Certificate "). 1. This Certificate of Water Availability is valid only for the real property referenced herein for the sole purpose of submission to the City of - /-0(44"City "). This Certificate is issued at the request of the City, and is not assignable or transferable to any other party. Further, no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency or as a third party beneficiary or otherwise. 2. The District makes no representations, express or implied, that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals, and authorizations from the City or any other applicable land use jurisdiction or governmental agency necessary before applicant can utilize the utility service which is the subject of this Certificate. 3. As of the date of the issuance of this Certificate, the District has water available to provide utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate, and the utility systems exist or may be extended by the applicant to provide service to such property. However, the issuance of this Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant or the City, and the issuance of this Certificate may not be relied upon and does not constitute the District's guarantee that water utility service will be available to the real property at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 4. Application for and the possible provision of District utility service to the real property which is the subject of this certificate shall be subject to and conditioned upon the availability of water service to the real property at the time of such application, as well as all federal, state, and District laws, ordinances, policies and regulations in effect at the time of such application for utility service, including conservation, water restrictions, and other policies and regulations then in effect. Applicant's Signatur Date District Representative (A- ft Date 5 A 9 1 0 0 RECEIVED 'JAN 17 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TICOR TITLE COMPANY cc: 600 SW 39th Street, Ste 100, Renton, WA 98057 (425)255 -7575 FAX (425)255 -0285 RE /MAX Eastside Brokers, Inc. 4452 S 160th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Sharon Mann RECEIVED IJAN 17 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Commitment No.: 6383876 -1 Customer Reference: R.Foley & Foley/ Document Recording Fee as of August 1, 2005: $33.00 - First Page Except Deed of Trust $34.00 - First Page of Deed of Trust $ 1.00 - Each Additional Page Except the following documents: $13.00 First Page, $1.00 Each Additional Page Assignment of Deed of Trust Substitution of Trustee Appointment of Successor Trustee Excise Fees effective July 1, 2005: $10.00 for any non - taxable transaction (replaces current $2.00 fee) $5.00 in addition to Excise Tax due on all taxable transactions Reconveyance Fee effective August 1, 2005: $120.00 - Base Fee $200.00 - Private Lost Note MUST INCLUDE: Original Deed of Trust (or Indemnity Agreement) Original Promissory Note (or Indemnity Agreement) Request for Full or Partial Reconveyance with ALL Beneficiary Signatures Release Tracking Fee effective March 1, 2006 $125.00 - Escrow Fee Thank you for giving us the opportunity to provide you with our services. • TICOR TITLE COMPANY 600 SW 39th Street, Ste 100, Renton, WA 98057 (425)255 - 7575 FAX (425)255 - 0285 Date: December 21, 2006 at 08:00 AM Prepared For: RE /MAX Eastside Brokers, Inc. 4452 S 160th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 INQUIRIES SHOULD BE MADE TO: UNIT 1 (425)255 -7472 Donna Roetter Linda Burbach TITLE IS VESTED IN: Jeffrey R.Foley and Harmony J. Foley, husband and wife Order No.: Your Reference: Charge: Tax: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A • 1 0E1VED 'JAN 17 2001 CoMMUNI DEVELOPpJ. 6383876 -1 R.Foley & Foley/ $ 250.00 $ 22.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, Tying west of Macadam Road South; EXCEPT that portion lying within the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 15, with the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40 °20'25" west along said west line, 72.55 feet; thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing along said curve, an arc distance of 24.51 feet; thence north 85 °17'33" west 180.67 feet to a point on the south line of said Government Lot 1, which is north 87 °48'32" west 375 feet from the point of beginning; thence south 10 °44'32" east 106 feet; :thence north 87 °04'51" east 197.60 feet to a point which bears south 08 °55'10" east from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 08 °55'10" west 81.42 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; EXCEPT that portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., and of Government Lot 1 of said Section 15, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south Tine of said Govemment Lot 1, in said Section 15, with the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40 °20'25" west along said west line, 72.55 feet; thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet; thence south 08 °55'10" east 81.42 feet; thence north 87 °04'51" east 169.0 feet to a point on the westerly line of said James Clark County Road, 'JAN 1 7 207 _ thence northerly along said west line 72 feet to the point of beginning; EvE LOPMENT EXCEPT beginning at the northwest corner of said north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; thence south 89 °56'42" east 378.6 feet; thence south 10 °44'32" east 125 feet; thence north 89 °56'42" west to a point 125 feet south of the point of beginning; thence north 125 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the south 80 feet of the north 205 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; EXCEPT the south 75 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said section. southerly 72 feet from the point of beginning; PLAT Certificate Schedule A • • SCHEDULE A RECEIVED (Continued) EXCEPTIONS: 1. Matters disclosed by Survey recorded under Recording Number 9605029001. 2. DEED OF TRUST, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: NOTES: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 14011 Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98168 A Single Family Residence C. 24 MONTH OWNERSHIP SEARCH: TOTAL TAXES: AMOUNT BILLED: AMOUNT PAID: JH/RE/12/28/2006 PLAT Certificate Schedule B • PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B • Jeffrey R.Foley and Harmony J. Foley, husband and wife Washington Administrative Services, Inc. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. 901 Semmes Avenue, Richmond, VA 23224 0144654761 $300,000.00 May 17, 2006 May 22, 2006 20060522002094 A. Abbreviated Legal for purposes of King County Recorders Office is: Ptn SE 15 -23 -04 . R ECEI!/ED 'JAN 1 7 2007 COMMUNl7• OE1/ELOga B. The records of King County and /or our inspection indicate that the address of the improvement located on said land is: According to the King County Tax Rolls the dwelling was built in 1920. The vesting deed into vestees herein was recorded on May 22, 2006 recorded under Recording Number 20060522002093 and the prior transfer date into the seller on that deed was June 28, 2002 recorded under Recording Number 20020628002845. (Copies of deeds attached.) D. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES: $2,477.90 $2,477.90 TAX YEARS: 2006 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 152304 - 9035 -02 LEVY CODE: 2413 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $111,000.00 Improvements: $80,000.00 / COM 10870 94890 2214006 201391. 981 244170 49947► 17947s 1378016 7013816 =_J Lt±J.11 2044 217384 1200000 217301. 237704. 183170s 964 3493910■ ti 100001 990 1790046 .1 922720. 9100 s sketch is for the purpose of a,tiowing approximate general location g the without actual survey a1 d 1S311nv . •; liability in litfil% »IIMf. 831820$ 9414 9 sCC 608612 1 p0 498801. 9018 801 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Name JEFFREY R. FOLEY Address 120 SOUTHWEST 194TH STREET City, State, Zip NORMANDY PARK, WA 98188 TIMOR TITLE lJ? NPLt89$-1 THE GRANTOR MEP TRINH and HUONG NGUYEN, Husband and Wife for and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration INCLUDING GRANTOR'S INITIAL LEG OF A SECTION 1031 TAX DEFERRED EXCHANGE in hand paid, conveys and warrants to JEFFREY R. FOLEY and HARMONY J. FOLEY, Husband and Wife the following described real estate, situated in the County of KING, State of Washington: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO: EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD THIS CONVEYANCE IS BEING MADE DIRECTLY BY GRANTOR TO GRANTEE AT THE REQUEST OF AND UNDER THE EXCLUSIVE CONTROL OF TAX DEFERRED EXCHANGE SERVICES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, WHO IS ACTING AS QUALIFIED INTERMEDIARY IN THIS TRANSACTION PTN SE 1/4, SEC 15- 23N -4E. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Account Number(s): 152304-9035 -02 Dated this 22nd day of May, 2006. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that HIEP TRINH and HUONG NGUYEN are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that THEY signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be THEIR free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrwnent. Dated: (al* } 99 • ill II, .... _ /r/ D 111111111 11 rl rl I JgN 1 7 1 nn, ii. 99 0 C �MMUN 7 � , , DIAN 413, E2208474 r Statutory Warranty Deed HIEP TRINH HUONG NGUYEN PAG6991 OP 901 r C Notary Public in and f or r tit S of aW shington Residing at k- My appointment expires: 5 aq1 D "Z 20060622002093.001 LPB -10 Commitment No. 6384898-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED /JAN 17 1001 �►T The land referred to In this Commitment is described as follows: The north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; In King County, Washington, lying west of Macadam Road South; EXCEPT that portion tying within the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 15, with the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40°20'25° west along said west line, 72.55 feet; thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing along said curve, an arc distance of 24.51 feet; thence north 85 °17'33" west 180.67 feet to a point on the south line of said Govemment Lot 1, which is north 87°48'32" west 375 feet from the point of beginning; thence south 10°44'32" east 106 feet; thence north 87°04'51" east 197.60 feet to a point which bears south 08°55'10" east from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 08°55'10" west 81.42 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; EXCEPT that portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., and of Government Lot 1 of said Section 15, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Govemment Lot 1, in said Section 15, with the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40°20'25" west along said west line, 72.55 feet; thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet; thence south 08 °55'10" east 81.42 feet; thence north 87°04'51" east 169.0 feet to a point on the westerly line of said James Clark County Road, southerly 72 feet from the point of beginning; thence northerly along said west linen feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT beginning at the northwest comer of said north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; thence south 89°56'42" east 378.6 feet; thence south 10 °44'32" east 126 feet; thence north 89°56'42" west to a point 125 feet south of the point of beginning; thence north 125 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the south 80 feet of the north 205 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M,; EXCEPT the south 75 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said section. 20060522002093.002 Name Hiep Trinh and Huong Nguyen Address 14011 MacAdam Rd City, State, Zip Tukwila, WA 98168 505808bu Reference# (If applicable)` Grantors) (1) Madriaga Lorelei. T (2) Grantees) (1) Trinh Hiep (2) Nguyen, Huong Addit Grantors) on pg Addit Grantee(s) on pg al Description(abbr ) PTN SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC 15 TWN 23 N RNG 4 E Addit legal(s) on pg a Assessor ax Parcel ID# 152304- 9035-02 5O5 f$. L STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THE GRANTOR Lorelei T. Madriaga, a single woman as her separate estate, for and in consideration of TEN AND NO /100 DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, in hand paid conveys and warrants to Hiep Trinh and Huong Nguyen, husband and wife, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Xing, State of Washington See Legal Description attached hereto and marked Exhibit A. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD AS ATTACHED HERETO MARKED "EXHIBIT B ", AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF King t ss. On this day personally appeared before me Lorelei T. Madriaga to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and p _es therein mentioned GIVEN under my hand and offi:fseal th LINDA K. ELLIS 1,71,1E or l,ASI {II2CT0N O►P.RY - ° p UEtlC ii.1 tr.,,ssz ants 3 N• Public in ;, e State of Washington, residing at pointment expires ,� ,O 03 E1895 5 4:y of `'' ° VA— Transnation A W OW =G WRY Form 7176 -3 (Rev 12 -96) Transnation Title Insurance Company • 1 #11$ 11 8 $ J4N17 ?00 o I :-ittsIDATTHEREOUESTOF 1RAhSNnTlQN T(;i.E INSUMNCE CO, PRx 01 , 200:x. OP 002 LPB10 ■ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXHIBIT "A" 67. JA N 1 7 2007 D C°Ea b TY THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; THENCE NORTH 40°20'25" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 °46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 °17'33" WEST 180.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, WHICH IS NORTH 87 ° 48'32" WEST 375 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 10 °44'32' EAST 106 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °04'51' EAST 197.60 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 08 °55'10' EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 08 °55'10' WEST 81.42 FEET TO THE TRUE' POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SAID SECTION 15, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; THENCE NORTH 40 °20'25" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 °46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08 °55'10' EAST 81.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 ° 04'51' EAST 169.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD, SOUTHERLY 72 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; RECEIVED 1JAN 11 2&1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST UNE 72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 89 °56'42" EAST 378.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 °4412 EAST 125 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °56'42' WEST TO A POINT 125 FEET SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 125 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 205 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SECTION; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. "SffiIBIT B" • RECEIVED rJAN 17 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MATTERS SET FORTH BY SURVEY: RECORDED: MAY 2, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 9605029001 DISCLOSES: POSSIBLE FENCE ENCROACHMENT ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED 20060522002094 After recording please return to: SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. (Company Name] RVW 5093 (Name of Natural Person) 1001 SEMMES AVENUE [Street Address] RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23224 (City, State Zip Code] DEFINITIONS (D) • M512002094.001 r JAN 1 71001 �o III — 04O 147. I � III 2 (J 060 002 94 TO / 1 DT 55.06 KING COUN Y, WA Assessor's Property Tax Parcel or Account Number: 152304-9035-02 Abbreviated Legal Description: PTN SE 1 /4, SEC 15- 23N-4E (Space Above This line For Recording Data] Loan No.: 0144654761 ART DEED OF TRUST Co 31oLtect'i5 MIN 100010401446547610 Words used in multiple sections of this document arc defined below and other words are defined in Sections 3, 11, 13, 18, 20 and 21. Certain rules regarding the usage of words used in this document are also provided in Section 16. (A) "Security Instrument" means this document, which is dated May 17, 2006, together with all Riders to this document. (B) "Borrower" is JEFFREY R FOLEY, HARMONY J FOLEY, HUSBAND AND WIFE. Borrower is the trustor under this Security Instrument. (C) "Lender" is SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.. Lender is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. Lender's address is 901 SEMMES AVENUE, RICHMOND, VA 23224. "Trustee" is WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. (E) "MERS" is Mortgage EIectronic Registration Systems, Inc. MERS is a separate corporation that is acting solely as a nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns. MERS Is the beneficiary under this Security Instrument. MERS is organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, and has an address and telephone number of P.O. Box 2026, Flint, MI 48501 -2026, tel. (888) 679 -MERS. Washington Deed of Trust -Single Family -Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT MERS Modified Form 3048 O1N1 —THE COMPLIANCE Sousa, Inc.— Page 1 of 15 14301 WA O& D 11 ww.coogtiroono�eeoin ►.( r . I I + 0 1 4 4 III �4 7 6 1 + G O A D+ + 1 5 II • • R IVED A E N 1 7 1007 CO MIt 7 UNITy (F) "Note" means the promissory note signed by Borrower and dated May 17, 2006. The Note state®iiLOp,'b Borrower owes Lender Three Hundred Thousand and 00/100ths Dollars (U.S. $300,000.00) plus interest. Borrower has promised to pay this debt in regular Periodic Payments and to pay the debt in full not later than June 1, 2036. (G) "Property" means the property that is described below under the heading "Transfer of Rights in the Property " (H) "Loan" means the debt evidenced by the Note, plus interest, any prepayment charges and late charges due under the Note, and all sums due under this Security Instrument, plus interest. (I) " Riders" means all Riders to this Security Instrument that are executed by Borrower. The following Riders are to be executed by Borrower [check box as applicable]: ® Adjustable Rate Rider ❑ Condominium Rider ❑ Second Horne Rider ❑ Balloon Rider ❑ Planned Unit Development Rider ❑ Biweekly Payment Rider ® 1-4 Family Rider ❑ Revocable Trust Rider ❑ Other(s) [specO] (J) "Applicable Law" means all controlling applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, ordinances and administrative rules and orders (that have the effect of law) as well as all applicable final, non - appealable judicial opinions. (K) "Community Association Dues, Fees, and Assessments" means all dues, fees, assessments and other charges that are imposed on Borrower or the Property by a condominium association, homeowners association or similar organization. (L) "Electronic Funds Transfer" means any transfer of funds, other than a transaction originated by check, draft, or similar paper instrument, which is initiated through an electronic terminal, telephonic instrument, computer, or magnetic tape so as to order, instruct, or authorize a financial institution to debit or credit an account. Such term includes, but is not limited to, point -of -sale transfers, automated teller machine transactions, transfers initiated by telephone, wire transfers, and automated clearinghouse transfers. (M) "Escrow Items" means those items that are described in Section 3. (N) "Miscellaneous Proceeds" means any compensation, settlement, award of damages, or proceeds paid by any third party (other than insurance proceeds paid under the coverages described in Section 5) for: (1) damage to, or destruction of, the Property; (ii) condemnation or other taking of all or any part of the Property; (iii) conveyance in lieu of condemnation; or (iv) misrepresentations of, or omissions as to, the value and/or condition of the Property. (0) "Mortgage Insurance" means insurance protecting Lender against the nonpayment of, or default on, the Loan. (P) "Periodic Payment" means the regularly scheduled amount due for (i) principal and interest under the Note, plus (ii) any amounts under Section 3 of this Security Instrument. (Q) "RESPA" means the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. §2601 et seq.) and its implementing regulation, Regulation X (24 C.F.R. Part 3500), as they might be amended from time to time, or any Washington Deed of Trust-Single Family - Fannie Mae Freddle Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC. — Page 2 of 15 + 0 4 4 8 5 4 7 8 1+ O O A D+ 2+ 5 MERS Modified Form 3048 O1/01 14301WA DLloO 20060522002094.002 TRANSFER OF RIGHTS IN THE PROPERTY • • additional or successor legislation or regulation that governs the same subject matter. As used in this Security Instrument, "RESPA" refers to all requirements and restrictions that are imposed in regard to a "federally related mortgage loan" even if the Loan does not qualify as a "federally related mortgage loan" under RESPA. (R) "Successor in Interest of Borrower" means any party that has taken title to the Property, whether or not that party has assumed Borrower's obligations under the Note and/or this Security Instrument. The beneficiary of this Security Instrument is MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) and the successors and assigns of MERS. This Security Instrument secures to Lender: (i) the repayment of the Loan, and all renewals, extensions and modifications of the Note; and (ii) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose, Borrower irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in the COUNTY of KING: [Type of Recording Jurisdiction] [Name of Recording Jurisdiction] SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE A which currently has the address of 14011 MACADAM RD S [Street) TUKWILA, Washington 98168 [aryl [Zip fie] TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all easements, appurtenances, and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. All replacements and additions shall also be covered by this Security Instrument. All of the foregoing is referred to in this Security Instrument as the "Property." Borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling this Security Instrument. BORROWER COVENANTS that Borrower is lawfully seized of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Property and that the Property is unencumbered, except for encumbrances of record. Borrower warrants and will defend generally the title to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to any encumbrances of record. THIS SECURITY INSTRUMENT combines uniform covenants for national use and non - uniform covenants with limited variations by jurisdiction to constitute a uniform security instrument covering real property. Washington Deed 'silliest-Single Family - Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 3 of 15 www.omy6mcemute.mm 11 uII1uIIp1Nl11I. ( "Property Address "): MERS Modified Form 3048 01/01 14301WA one 11 Finn 0 0 A D+ 3+ 1 5 fJA- 1 7 10p Io M 1 • Commitment No. 6364898 -1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: • The north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., In King County, Washington, lying west of Macadam Road South; EXCEPT that portion lying within the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of Government Lot 1, in said Section 15, with the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40°20'25" west along said west line, 72.55 feet thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing along said curve, an arc distance of 24.51 feet; thence north 85 °17'33" west 180,67 feet to a point on the south line of said Government Lot 1, which Is north 8748'32" west 375 feet from the point of beginning; thence south 10 °44'32" east 106 feet; thence north 87 °04'51" east 197.60 feet to a point which bears south 08 °55'10" east from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 08 °55'10" west 81.42 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; EXCEPT that portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., and of Govemment Lot 1 of said Section 15, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Govemment Lot 1, in said Section 15, With the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40°20'25" west along said west line, 72.55 feet; thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet; thence south 08 ° 55'10" east 81.42 feet; thence north 87 °04'51" east 169.0 feet to a point on the westerly line of said James Clark County Road, southerly 72 feet from the point of beginning; thence northerly along said west line 72 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT beginning at the northwest comer of said north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; thence south 89 °5642" east 378.6 feet; thence south 10 44'32" east 125 feet; thence north 89 °56'42" west to a point 125 feet south of the point of beginning; thence north 125 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the south 80 feet of the north 205 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; EXCEPT the south 75 feet of the west 408.7 feet of sald section. 20060522002094.004 • • UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lender covenant and agree as follows: Op 1. Payment of Principal, Interest, Escrow Items, Prepayment Charges, and Late Charges. V t Borrower shall pay when due the principal of, and interest on, the debt evidenced by the Note and any prepayment charges and late charges due under the Note. Borrower shall also pay funds for Escrow Items pursuant to Section 3. Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument shall be made in U.S. currency. However, if any check or other instrument received by Lender as payment under the Note or this Security Instrument is returned to Lender unpaid, Lender may require that any or all subsequent payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument be made in one or more of the following forms, as selected by Lender: (a) cash; (b) money order; (c) certified check, bank check, treasurer's check or cashier's cheek, provided any such check is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instrumentality, or entity; or (d) Electronic Funds Transfer. Payments are deemed received by Lender when received at the location designated in the Note or at such other location as may be designated by Lender in accordance with the notice provisions in Section 15. Lender may return any payment or partial payment if the payment or partial payments are insufficient to bring the Loan current. Lender may accept any payment or partial payment insufficient to bring the Loan current, without waiver of any rights hereunder or prejudice to its rights to refuse such payment or partial payments in the future, but Lender is not obligated to apply such payments at the time such payments are accepted. If each Periodic Payment is applied as of its scheduled due date, then Lender need not pay interest on unapplied funds. Lender may hold such unapplied funds until Borrower makes payment to bring the Loan current. If Borrower does not do so within a reasonable period of time, Lender shall either apply such funds or return them to Borrower. If not applied earlier, such funds will be applied to the outstanding principal balance under the Note immediately prior to foreclosure. No offset or claim which Borrower might have now or in the future against Lender shall relieve Borrower from making payments due under the Note and this Security Instnsrnent or performing the covenants and agreements secured by this Security Instrument. 2. Application of Payments or Proceeds. Except as otherwise described in this Section 2, all payments accepted and applied by Lender shall be applied in the following order of priority: (a) interest due under the Note; (b) principal due under the Note; (c) amounts due under Section 3. Such payments shall be applied to each Periodic Payment in the order in which it became due. Any remaining amounts shall be applied first to late charges, second to any other amounts due under this Security Instrument, and then to reduce the principal balance of the Note. If Lender receives a payment from Borrower for a delinquent Periodic Payment which includes a sufficient amount to pay any late charge due, the payment may be applied to the delinquent payment and the late charge. If more than one Periodic Payment is outstanding, Lender may apply any payment received from Borrower to the repayment of the Periodic Payments if, and to the extent that, each payment can be paid in full. To the extent that any excess exists after the payment is applied to the full payment of' one or more Periodic Payments, such excess may be applied to any late charges due. Voluntary prepayments shall be applied first to any prepayment charges and then as described in the Note. Any application of payments, insurance proceeds, or Miscellaneous Proceeds to principal due under the Note shall not extend or postpone the due date, or change the amount, of the Periodic Payments. 3. Funds for Escrow Items. Borrower shall pay to Lender on the day Periodic Payments are due under the Note, until the Note is paid in full, a sum (the "Funds ") to provide for payment of amounts due for (a) taxes and assessments and other items which can attain priority over this Security Instrument as a lien or encumbrance on the Property; (b) leasehold payments or ground rents on the Property, if any; (c) premiums for any and all insurance required by Lender under Section 5; and (d) Mortgage Insurance premiums, if any, or any sums payable by Borrower to Lender in lieu of the payment of Mortgage Insurance premiums in accordance with the provisions of Section 10. These items are called "Escrow Items." At origination or at any time during the term of the Loan, Lender may require that Community Association Dues, Fees, and Assessments, if any, be escrowed by Borrower, and such dues, fees and assessments shall be an Escrow Item. Borrower shall promptly furnish to Lender all notices of amounts to be paid under this Section. Borrower shall pay Lender the Funds for Escrow Items unless Lender waives Borrower's obligation to pay the Funds for any or all Escrow Items. Lender may waive Borrower's Washington Deed ofmiat -Single Family- Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT 711E COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page4 of 5 www.conWllinneuoura.00m 11 111 111111111111,1 1 1 MEES Modified Form 3045 01,01 Itl01WA 0*PoO + 1 1 1 1 1 A D+ + 1 5 20060522002094.005 fq4, F� Co X441 • 002094.006 c 200? obligation to pay to Lender Funds for any or all Escrow Items at any time. Any such waiver may only be in writing. In the event of such waiver, Borrower shall pay directly, when and where payable, the amounts due for any Escrow Items for which payment of Fwids has been waived by Lender and, if Lender requires, shall furnish to Lender receipts evidencing such payment within such time period as Lender may require. Borrower's obligation to make such payments and to provide receipts shall for all purposes be deemed to be a covenant and agreement contained in this Security Instrument, as the phrase "covenant and agreement" is used in Section 9. If Borrower is obligated to pay Escrow Items directly, pursuant to a waiver, and Borrower fails to pay the amount due for an Escrow Item, Lender may exercise its rights under Section 9 and pay such amount and Borrower shall then be obligated under Section 9 to repay to Lender any such amount. Lender may revoke the waiver as to any or all Escrow bents at any time by a notice given in accordance with Section 15 and, upon such revocation, Borrower shall pay to Lender all Funds, and in such amounts, that are then required under this Section 3. Lender may, at any lime, collect and hold Funds in an amount (a) sufficient to permit Lender to apply the Funds at the time specified under RESPA, and (b) not to exceed the maximum arnount a lender can require under RESPA. Lender shall estimate the amount of Funds due on the basis of current data and reasonable estimates of expenditures of future Escrow Items or otherwise in accordance with Applicable Law. The Funds shall be held in an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instrumentality, or entity (including Lender, if Lender is an in.stitution whose deposits are so instued) or in any Federal Home Loan Bank. Lender shall apply the Funds to pay the Escrow Reins no later than the tinie specified under RESPA. Lender shall not charge Borrower for holding and applying the Funds, annually analyzing the escrow account, or verifying the Escrow Items, unless Lender pays Borrower interest on die Funds and Applicable Law permits Lender to malce such a charge. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on the Funds, Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on the Funds. Borrower and Lender can agree in writing, however, that interest shall be paid on the Funds. Lender shall give to Borrower, without charge, an annual accounting of the Funds as required by RESPA. If there is a surplus of Funds held in escrow, as defined under RESPA, Lender shall account to Borrower for die excess fimds in accordance with RESPA. If there is a shortage of Funds held in escrow, as defined under RESPA, Lender shall notify Borrower as required by RESPA, and Borrower shall pay to Lender the amount necessary to make up the shortage in accordance with RFSPA, but in no more than 12 monthly payments. If there is a deficiency of Funds held in escrow, as dermed under RESPA, Lender shall notify Borrower as required by RESPA, and Borrower shall pay to Lender the amount necessary to make up the deficiency in accordance with RESPA, but in no more than 12 monthly payments. Upon payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument, Lender shall promptly refimd to Borrower any Funds held by Lender. 4. Charges; Liens. Borrower shall pay all taxes, assessments, charges, fines, and impositions attributable to the Property which can attain priority over this Security Instrument, leasehold payments or ground rents on the Property, if any, and Community Association Dues, Fees, and Assessments, if any. To the extent that these items are Escrow Items, Borrower shall pay them in the manner provided in Section 3. Borrower shall promptly discharge any lien which has priority over this Security Instrument unless Borrower: (a) agrees in writing to the payment of the obligation secured by the lien in a manner acceptable to Lender, but only so long as Borrower is performing such agreement; (b) contests the lien in good faith by, or defends against enforcement of the lien in, legal proceedings which in L,ender's opinion operate to prevent the enforcement of the lien while those proceedings are pending, but only until such proceedings are concluded; or (c) secures from the holder of the lien an agreement satisfactory to Lender subordinating the lien to this Security Instnunent. If Lender deterrnines that any part of the Property is subject to a lien which can attain priority over this Security Instrument, Lender rnay give Borrower a notice identifying the lien. Within 10 days of the date on which that notice is given, Borrower shall satisfy the lien or take one or more of the actions set forth above in this Section 4. Lender may require Borrower to pay a one-time charge for a real estate tax verification and/or reporting service used by Lender in connection with this Loan. Washington Deed of Trust-Single Family - Fannie Mae/Freddle Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 5 of 15 v w.eatptluiaomta,mm 11 p{p 1 1 ��I MERS Modified Form 3048 OLOl 14301WA 55100 if :14.. r • • a Insurance. Borrower shall keep the improvements now existing h C E OP y 5. Property p rty ecp tmpro ling or hereafter erected on m al e °��P Property insured against loss by fire, hazards included within the term "extended coverage," and any other hazards including, but not limited to, earthquakes and floods, for which Lender requires insurance. This insurance shall be maintained in the amounts (including deductible levels) and for the periods that Lender requires. What Lender requires pursuant to the preceding sentences can change during the term of the Loan. The insurance carrier providing the insurance shall be chosen by Borrower subject to Lender's right to disapprove Borrower's choice, which right shall not be exercised unreasonably. Lender may require Borrower to pay, in connection with this Loan, either: (a) a one -time charge for flood zone determination, certification and tiacldng services; or (b) a one -time charge for flood zone determination and certification services and subsequent charges each time remappings or similar changes occur which reasonably might affect such determination or certification. Borrower shall also be responsible for the payment of any fees imposed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in connection with the review of any flood zone determination resulting from an objection by Borrower. If Borrower fails to maintain any of the coverages described above, Lender may obtain insurance coverage, at Lender's option and Borrower's expense. Lender is under no obligation to purchase any particular type or amount of coverage. Therefore, such coverage shall cover 'Lender, but might or might not protect Borrower, Borrower's equity in the Property, or the contents of the Property, against any risk, hazard or liability and might provide greater or lesser coverage than was previously in effect. Borrower acknowledges that the cost of the insurance coverage so obtained might significantly exceed the cost of insurance that Borrower could have obtained. Any amounts disbursed by Lender under this Section 5 shall become additional debt of Borrower secured by this Security Instrument. These amounts shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of disbursement and shall be payable, with such interest, upon notice from Lender to Borrower requesting payment. All insurance policies required by Lender and renewals of such policies shall be subject to Lender's right to disapprove such policies, shall include a standard mortgage clause, and shall name Lender as mortgagee and/or as an additional loss payee. Lender shall have the right to hold the policies and renewal certificates. If Lender requires, Borrower shall promptly give to Lender all receipts of paid premiums and renewal notices. If Borrower obtains any form of insurance coverage, not otherwise required by Lender, for damage to, or destruction of, the Property, such policy shall include a standard mortgage clause and shall name Lender as mortgagee and/or as an additional loss payee. In the event of loss, Borrower shall give prompt notice to the insurance carrier and Lender. Lender may make proof of loss if not made promptly by Borrower. Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, any insurance proceeds, whether or not the underlying insurance was required by Lender, shall be applied to restoration or repair of the Property, if the restoration or repair is economically feasible and Lender's security is not lessened. During such repair and restoration period, Lender ball have the right to hold such insurance proceeds until Lender has had an opportunity to inspect such Property to ensure the work has been completed to Lender's satisfaction, provided that . such inspection shall be undertaken promptly. Lender may disburse proceeds for the repairs and restoration in a single payment or in a series of progress payments as the work is completed. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on such insurance proceeds, Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on such proceeds. Fees for public adjusters, or other third parties, retained by Borrower shall not be paid out of the insurance proceeds and shall be the sole obligation of Borrower. If the restoration or repair is not economically feasible or Lender's security would be lessened, the insurance proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due, with the excess, if any, paid to Borrower. Such insurance proceeds shall be applied in the order provided for in Section 2. If Borrower abandons the Property, Lender may file, negotiate and settle any available insurance claim and related matters. If Borrower does not respond within 30 days to a notice from Lender that the insurance carrier has offered to settle a claim, then Lender may negotiate and settle the claim. The 30-day period will begin when the notice is given. In either event, or if Lender acquires the Property under Section 22 or otherwise, Borrower hereby assigns to Lender (a) Borrower's rights to any insurance proceeds in an amount not to exceed the amounts unpaid under the Note or this Security Instrument, and (b) any other of Borrower's rights (other than the right to any refund Washington Deed of7Yaat- Single Family.Fannle Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —TDB COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 6 of 15 r" w.complimawurce.com 11 imp] 1 MERS Modified Form 3048 O1/01 1tl01WA WOO 1,1 1 0 11 A ltila 20060522002094.007 RE CEIVED rJAN 1 7 2007 • of unearned premiums paid by Borrower) under all insurance policies covering the Property, insofar ass EI11T are applicable to the coverage of the Property. Lender may use the insurance proceeds either to repair or restore the Property or to pay amounts unpaid under the Note or this Security Instrument, whether or not then due. 6. Occupancy. Borrower shall occupy, establish, and use the Property as Borrower's principal residence within 60 days after the execution of this Security Instrument and shall continue to occupy the Property as Borrower's principal residence for at least one year after the date of occupancy, unless Lender otherwise agrees in writing, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, or unless extenuating circumstances exist which are beyond Borrower's control. 7. Preservation, Maintenance and Protection of the Property; Inspections. Borrower shall not destroy, damage or impair the Property, allow the Property to deteriorate or commit waste on the Property. Whether or not Borrower is residing in the Property, Borrower shall maintain the Property in order to prevent the Property from deteriorating or decreasing in value due to its condition. Unless it is determined pursuant to Section 5 that repair or restoration is not economically feasible, Borrower shall promptly repair the Property if damaged to avoid further deterioration or damage. If insurance or condemnation proceeds are paid in connection with damage to, or the taking of, the Property, Borrower shall be responsible for repairing or restoring the Property only if Lender has released proceeds for such purposes. Lender may disburse proceeds for the repairs and restoration in a single payment or in a series of progress payments as the work is completed. If the insurance or condemnation proceeds are not sufficient to repair or restore the Property, Borrower is not relieved of Borrower's obligation for the completion of such repair or restoration. Lender or its agent may make reasonable entries upon and inspections of the Property. If it has reasonable cause, Lender may inspect the interior of the improvements on the Property. Lender shall give Borrower notice at the time of or prior to such an interior inspection specifying such reasonable cause. 8. Borrower's Loan Application. Borrower shall be in default if, during the Loan application process, Borrower or any persons or entities acting at the direction of Borrower or with Borrower's knowledge or consent gave materially false, misleading, or inaccurate information or statements to Lender (or failed to provide Lender with material information) in connection with the Loan. Material representations include, but are not limited to, representations concerning Borrower's occupancy of the Property as Borrower's principal residence. 9. Protection of Lender's Interest in the Property and Rights Under this Security Instrument. If (a) Borrower fails to perform the covenants and agreements contained in this Security Instrument, (b) there is a legal proceeding that might significantly affect Lender's interest in the Property and/or rights under this Security Instrument (such as a proceeding in bankruptcy, probate, for condemnation or forfeiture, for enforcement of a lien which may attain priority over this Security Instrument or to enforce laws or regulations), or (c) Borrower has abandoned the Property, then Lender may do and pay for whatever is reasonable or appropriate to protect Lender's interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument, including protecting and/or assessing the value of the Property, and securing and/or repairing the Property. Lender's actions can include, but are not limited to: (a) paying any sums secured by a lien which has priority over this Security Instrument; (b) appearing in court; and (c) paying reasonable attorneys' fees to protect its interest in the Property and/or rights under this Security Instrument, including its secured position in a bankruptcy proceeding. Securing the Property includes, but is not limited to, entering the Property to make repairs, change locks, replace or board up doors and windows, drain water from pipes, eliminate building or other code violations or dangerous conditions, and have utilities turned on or off. Although Lender may take action under this Section 9, Lender does not have to do so and is not under any duty or obligation to do so. It is agreed that Lender incurs no liability for not taking any or all actions authorized under this Section 9. Any amounts disbursed by Lender under this Section 9 shall become additional debt of Borrower secured by this Security Instrument. These amounts shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of disbursement and shall be payable, with such interest, upon notice from Lender to Borrower requesting payment. Washington Deed of Trust -Single Family- Fannie Mae/Freddie Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT MERS Modified Form 3048 01,01 —Tint COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 7 of 15 14301 WA 08100 w ww.comptianououroawm I . ��IIIlII���plll 0 0 A + I5 20060522002094.008 Receive 'JAN 1 71007 • 20060522002094.009 ReCEil r JAN 1 7 ?007 All ry If this Security Instrument is on a leasehold, Borrower shall comply with all the provisions of the lease. If � Borrower acquires fee title to the Property, the leasehold and the fee title shall not merge unless Lender agrees to the merger in writing. 10. Mortgage Insurance. If Lender required Mortgage Insurance as a condition of making the Loan, Borrower shall pay the premiums required to maintain the Mortgage Insurance in effect. If, for any reason, the Mortgage Insurance coverage required by Lender ceases to be available from the mortgage insurer that previously provided such insurance and Borrower was required to make separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance, Borrower shall pay the premiums required to obtain coverage substantially equivalent to the Mortgage Insurance previously in effect, at a cost substantially equivalent to the cost to Borrower of the Mortgage Insurance previously in effect, from an alternate mortgage insurer selected by Lender. If substantially equivalent Mortgage Insurance coverage is not available, Borrower shall continue to pay to Lender the amount of the separately designated payments that were due when the insurance coverage ceased to be in effect. Lender will accept, use and retain these payments as a non - refundable loss reserve in lieu of Mortgage Insurance. Such loss reserve shall be non - refundable, notwithstanding the fact that the Loan is ultimately paid in full, and Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on such loss reserve. Lender can no longer require loss reserve payments if Mortgage Insurance coverage (in the amount and for the period that Lender requires) provided by an insurer selected by Lender again becomes available, is obtained, and Lender requires separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance. If Lender required Mortgage Insurance as a condition of making the Loan and Borrower was required to make separately designated payments toward the premiums for Mortgage Insurance, Borrower shall pay the premiums required to maintain Mortgage Insurance in effect, or to provide a non - refundable loss reserve, until Lender's requirement for Mortgage Insurance ends in accordance with any written agreement between Borrower and Lender providing for such termination or until termination is required by Applicable Law. Nothing in this Section 10 affects Borrower's obligation to pay interest at the rate provided in the Note. Mortgage Insurance reimburses Lender (or any entity that purchases the Note) for certain losses it may incur if Borrower does not repay the Loan as agreed. Borrower is not a party to the Mortgage Insurance. Mortgage insurers evaluate their total risk on all such insurance in force from time to time, and may enter into agreements with other parties that share or modify their risk, or reduce losses. These agreements are on terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the mortgage insurer and the other party (or parties) to these agreements. These agreements may require the mortgage insurer to make payments using any source of funds that the mortgage insurer may have available (which may include funds obtained from Mortgage Insurance premiums). As a result of these agreements, Lender, any purchaser of the Note, another insurer, any reinsurer, any other entity, or any affiliate of any of the foregoing, may receive (directly or indirectly) amounts that derive from (or might be characterized as) a portion of Borrower's payments for Mortgage Insurance, in exchange for sharing or modifying the mortgage insurer's risk, or reducing losses. If such agreement provides that an affiliate of Lender takes a share of the insurer's risk in exchange for a share of the premiums paid to the insurer, the arrangement is often termed "captive reinsurance." Further: (a) Any such agreements will not affect the amounts that Borrower has agreed to pay for Mortgage Insurance, or any other terms of the Loan. Such agreements will not increase the amount Borrower will owe for Mortgage Insurance, and they will not entitle Borrower to any refund. (b) Any such agreements will not affect the rights Borrower has — if any — with respect to the Mortgage Insurance under the Homeowners Protection Act of 1998 or any other law. These rights may include the right to receive certain disclosures, to request and obtain cancellation of the Mortgage Insurance, to have the Mortgage Insurance terminated automatically, and/or to receive a refund of any Mortgage Insurance premiums that were unearned at the time of such cancellation or termination. 11. Assignment of Miscellaneous Proceeds; Forfeiture. All Miscellaneous Proceeds are hereby assigned to and shall be paid to Lender. If the Property is damaged, such Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to restoration or repair of the Property, if the restoration or repair is economically feasible and Lender's security is not lessened. During such Washington Deed of Trust - Single Family- Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — The COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 8 or 15 www.compliancesoureacan II + 0 4 4 6 5 4 7 6 MFRS Modified Form 3045 01A01 14301WA OMDO 11 • • repair and restoration period, Lender shall have the right to hold such Miscellaneous Proceeds until Lender has had an opportunity to inspect such Property to ensure the work has been completed to Lender's satisfaction, provided that such inspection shall be undertaken promptly. Lender may pay for the repairs and restoration in a single disbursement or in a series of progress payments as the work is completed. Unless an agreement is made in writing or Applicable Law requires interest to be paid on such Miscellaneous Proceeds, Lender shall not be required to pay Borrower any interest or earnings on such Miscellaneous Proceeds. If the restoration or repair is not economically feasible or Lender's security would be lessened, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due, with the excess, if any, paid to Borrower. Such Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied in the order provided for in Section 2. In the event of a total taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Property, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due, with the excess, if any, paid to Borrower. In the event of a partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Property in which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value is equal to or greater than the amount of the sums secured by this Security Instrument immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or Loss in value, unless Borrower and Lender otherwise agree in writing, the sums secured by this Security Instrument shall be reduced by the amount of the Miscellaneous Proceeds multiplied by the following fraction: (a) the total amount of the sums secured immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value divided by (b) the fair market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value. Any balance shall be paid to Borrower. In the event of a partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Property in which the fair market value of the Property immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or Ioss in value is less than the amount of the sums secured immediately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value, unless Borrower and Lender otherwise agree in writing, the Miscellaneous Proceeds shall be applied to thc sums secured by this Security Instrument whether or not the sums are then due. If the Property is abandoned by Borrower, or if, after notice by Lender to Borrower that the Opposing Party (as defined in the next sentence) offers to make an award to settle a claim for damages, Borrower fails to respond to Lender within 30 days after the date the notice is given, Lender is authorized to collect and apply the Miscellaneous Proceeds either to restoration or repair of the Property or to the sums secured by this Security Instrument, whether or not then due. "Opposing Party" means the third party that owes Borrower Miscellaneous Proceeds or the party against whom Borrower has a right of action in regard to Miscellaneous Proceeds. Borrower shall be in default if any action or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, is begun that, in Lender's judgment, could result in forfeiture of the Property or other material impairment of Lender's interest in the Property or rights under this Security Instrument. Borrower can cure such a default and, if acceleration has occurred, reinstate as provided in Section 19, by causing the action or proceeding to be dismissed with a ruling that, in Lender's judgment, precludes forfeiture of the Property or other material impairment of Lender's interest in the Property or rights under this Security Instrument. The proceeds of any award or claim for damages that are attributable to the impairment of Lender's interest in the Property are hereby assigned and shall be paid to Lender. All Miscellaneous Proceeds that are not applied to restoration or repair of the Property shall be applied in the order provided for in Section 2. 12. Borrower Not Released; Forbearance By Lender Not a Waiver. Extension of the time for payment or modification of amortization of the sums secured by this Security Instrument granted by Lender to Borrower or any Successor in Interest of Borrower shall not operate to release the liability of Borrower or any Successors in Interest of Borower. Lender shall not be required to commence proceedings against any Successor in Interest of Borrower or to refuse to extend time for payment or otherwise modify amortization of the sums secured by this Security Instrument by reason of any demand made by the original Borrower or any Successors in Interest of Borrower. Any forbearance by Lender in exercising any right or remedy including, without limitation, Lender's Washington Deed of 11vst- Single Family- Fannie Mae/Fra[dle Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 9 of S w vmmpMnayowoe.amn 11 IIUIIVpIAIIVIIpII 1 1 + MERS Modified Form 3048 01/01 14301W/4 MOO 11 NO 202002094.010 I'jA- 1 7 ?00 "'El-04714r • • Washington Deed of Trust-Single Family -Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC. Page 10 of 15 wvv compliaeeaowoe.com 11 III I1I1II11A1I1111 1 1 200 M j 7 2001 DMM� Op� acceptance of payments from third persons, entities or Successors in Interest of Borrower or in amounts less than the amount then due, shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any right or remedy. 13. Joint and Several Liability; Co- signers; Successors and Assigns Bound. Borrower covenants and agrees that Borrower's obligations and liability shall be joint and several. However, any Borrower who co -signs this Security Instrument but does not execute the Note (a "co- signer"): (a) is co-signing this Security Instrument only to mortgage, grant and convey the co- signer's interest in the Property under the terms of this Security Instrument; (b) is not personally obligated to pay the sums secured by this Security Instrument; and (c) agrees that Lender and any other Borrower can agree to extend, modify, forbear or make any accommodations with regard to the terms of this Security Instrument or the Note without the co-signer's consent. Subject to the provisions of Section 18, any Successor in Interest of Borrower who assumes Borrower's obligations under this Security Instrument in writing, and is approved by Lender, shall obtain all of Borrower's rights and benefits under this Security Instrument. Borrower shall not be released from Borrower's obligations and liability under this Security Instrument unless Lender agrees to such release in writing. The covenants and agreements of this Security Instrument shall bind (except as provided in Section 20) and benefit the successors and assigns of Lender. 14. Loan Charges. Lender may charge Borrower fees for services performed in connection with Borrower's default, for the purpose of protecting Lender's interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, property inspection and valuation fees. In regard to any other fees, the absence of express authority in this Security Instrument to charge a specific fee to Borrower shall not be construed as a prohibition on the charging of such fee. Lender may not charge fees that are expressly prohibited by this Security Instrument or by Applicable Law. If the Loan is subject to a law which sets maximum loan charges, and that law is finally interpreted so that the interest or other loan charges collected or to be collected in connection with the Loan exceed the permitted limits, then: (a) any such loan charge shall be reduced by the amount necessary to reduce the charge to the permitted limit; and (b) any sums already collected from Borrower which exceeded permitted limits will be refunded to Borrower. Lender may choose to make this refund by reducing the principal owed under the Note or by malting a direct payment to Borrower. If a refund reduces principal, the reduction will be treated as a partial prepayment without any prepayment charge (whether or not a prepayment charge is provided for under the Note). Borrower's acceptance of any such refund made by direct payment to Borrower will constitute a waiver of any right of action Borrower might have arising out of such overcharge. 15. Notices. All notices given by Borrower or Lender in connection with this Security Instrument must be in writing. Any notice to Borrower in connection with this Security Instrument shall be deemed to have been given to Borrower when mailed by first class mail or when actually delivered to Borrower's notice address if sent by other means. Notice to any one Borrower shall constitute notice to all Borrowers unless Applicable Law expressly requires otherwise. The notice address shall be the Property Address unless Borrower has designated a substitute notice address by notice to Lender. Borrower shall promptly notify Lender of Borrower's change of address. If Lender specifies a procedure for reporting Borrower's change of address, then Borrower shall only report a change of address through that specified procedure. There may be only one designated notice address under this Security Instrument at any one time. Any notice to Lender shall be given by delivering it or by mailing it by first class mail to Lender's address stated herein unless Lender has designated another address by notice to Borrower. Any notice in connection with this Security Instrument shall not be deemed to have been given to Lender until actually received by Lender. If any notice required by this Security Instrument is also required under Applicable Law, the Applicable Law requirement will satisfy the corresponding requirement under this Security Instrument. 16. Governing Law; Severability; Rules of Construction. This Security Instrument shall be govemed by federal law and the law of the jurisdiction in which the Property is located. All rights and obligations contained in this Security Instrument are subject to any requirements and limitations of Applicable Law. Applicable Law might explicitly or implicitly allow the parties to agree by contract or it might be silent, but such silence shall not be construed as a prohibition against agreement by contract. In the event that any provision or clause of this Security MERS Modifed Form 3048 01101 14301 WA 01100 11 111 111 11111111 0 0 A D+ 0+ 1 5 02094.011 • 2002002094.012 / ✓qN 7 Instrument or the Note conflicts with Applicable Law, such conflict shall not affect other provisions of this Security C P �Ey T Instalment or the Note which can be given effect without the conflicting provision. As used in this Security Instrument: (a) words of the masculine gender shall mean and include corresponding neuter words or words of the feminine gender; (b) words in the singular shall mean and include the plural and vice versa; and (c) the word "may" gives sole discretion without any obligation to take any action. 17. Borrower's Copy. Borrower shall be given one copy of the Note and of this Security Instrument. 18. Transfer of the Property or a Beneficial Interest to Borrower. As used in this Section 18, "Interest in the Property" means any legal or beneficial interest in the Property, including, but not limited to, those beneficial interests transferred in a bond for deed, contract for deed, installment sales contract or escrow agreement, the intent of which is the transfer of title by Borrower at a future date to a purchaser. If all or any part of the Property or any Interest in the Property is sold or transferred (or if Borrower is not a natural person and a beneficial interest in Borrower is sold or transferred) without Lender's prior written consent, Lender may require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by Applicable Law. If Lender exercises this option, Lender shall give Borrower notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a period of not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given in accordance with Section 15 within which Borrower must pay all sums secured by this Security Instrument. If Borrower fails to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any remedies permitted by this Security Instrument without further notice or demand on Borrower. 19. Borrower's Right to Reinstate After Acceleration. If Borrower meets certain conditions, Borrower shall have the right to have enforcement of this Security Instrument discontinued at any time prior to the earliest of: (a) five days before sale of the Property pursuant to any power of sale contained in this Security Instrument; (b) such other period as Applicable Law might specify for the termination of Borrower's right to reinstate; or (c) entry of a judgment enforcing this Security Instrument. Those conditions are that Borrower: (a) pays Lender all sums which then would be due under this Security Instrument and the Note as if no acceleration had occurred; (b) cures any default of any other covenants or agreements; (c) pays all expenses incurred in enforcing this Security Instrument, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, property inspection and valuation fees, and other fees incurred for the purpose of protecting Lender's interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument; and (d) takes such action as Lender may reasonably require to assure that Lender's interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument, and Borrower's obligation to pay the sums secured by this Security Instrument, shall continue unchanged. Lender may require that Borrower pay such reinstatement sums and expenses in one or more of the following forms, as selected by Lender: (a) cash; (b) money order; (c) certified check, bank check, treasurer's check or cashier's check, provided any such check is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instrumentality or entity; or (d) Electronic Funds Transfer. Upon reinstatement by Borrower, this Security Instrument and obligations secured hereby shall remain fully effective as if no acceleration had occurred. However, this right to reinstate shall not apply in the case of acceleration under Section 18. 20. Sale of Note; Change of Loan Servicer; Notice of Grievance. The Note or a partial interest in the Note (together with this Security Instrument) can be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower. A sale might result in a change in the entity (known as the "Loan Servicer") that collects Periodic Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument and performs other mortgage loan servicing obligations under the Note, this Security Instrument, and Applicable Law. There also might be one or more changes of the Loan Servicer unrelated to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan Servicer, Borrower will be given written notice of the change which will state the name and address of the new Loan Servicer, the address to which payments should be made and any other information RESPA requires in connection with a notice of transfer of servicing. If the Note is sold and thereafter the Loan is serviced by a Loan Servicer other than the purchaser of the Note, the mortgage loan servicing obligations to Borrower will remain with the Loan Servicer or be transferred to a successor Loan Servicer and are not assumed by the Note purchaser unless otherwise provided by the Note purchaser. Washington Deed ofTlvstSingle Family - Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 11 of 15 www.00mp0ancecmuoe.uom B ll i p 1 111 11Ji 1. MERS Modified Form 3048 01/01 14301WA ONO 1111111.11. 5 II • • 20060522002094.013 Neither Borrower nor Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action (as either individual litigant or the member of a class) that arises from the other party's actions pursuant to this Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, • N Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party (with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time period which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be deemed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to cure given to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provisions of this Section 20. 21. Hazardous Substances. As used in this Section 21: (a) "Hazardous Substances" are those substances defined as toxic or hazardous substances, pollutants, or wastes by Environmental Law and the following substances: gasoline, kerosene, other flammable or toxic petroleum products, toxic pesticides and herbicides, volatile solvents, materials containing asbestos or formaldehyde, and radioactive materials; (b) `Environmental Law" means federal laws and laws of the jurisdiction where the Property is located that relate to health, safety or environmental protection; (c) "Environmental Cleanup" includes any response action, remedial action, or removal action, as defined in Environmental Law; and (d) an "Environmental Condition" means a condition that can cause, contribute to, or otherwise trigger an Environmental Cleanup. Borrower shall not cause or permit the presence, use, disposal, storage, or release of any Hazardous Substances, or threaten to release any Hazardous Substances, on or in the Property. Borrower shall not do, nor allow anyone else to do, anything affecting the Property (a) that is in violation of any Environmental Law, (b) which creates an Environmental Condition, or (c) which, due to the presence, use, or release of a Hazardous Substance, creates a condition that adversely affects the value of the Property. The preceding two sentences shall not apply to the presence, use, or storage on the Property of small quantities of Hazardous Substances that are generally recognized to be appropriate to normal residential uses and to maintenance of the Property (including, but not limited to, hazardous substances in consumer products). Borrower shall promptly give Lender written notice of (a) any investigation, claim, demand, lawsuit or other action by any governmental or regulatory agency or private party involving the Property and any Hazardous Substance or Environmental Law of which Borrower has actual knowledge, (b) any Environmental Condition, including but not limited to, any spilling, leaking, discharge, release or threat of release of any Hazardous Substance, and (c) any condition caused by the presence, use or release of a Hazardous Substance which adversely affects the value of the Property. If Borrower learns, or is notified by any governmental or regulatory authority, or any private party, that any removal or other remediation of any Hazardous Substance affecting the Property is necessary, Borrower shall promptly take all necessary remedial actions in accordance with Environmental Law, Nothing herein shall create any obligation on Lender for an Environmental Cleanup. Washington Deed of 'frost-Single Family- Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —Tire Comm/talcs SOURCE, Mc.-- Page 12 of 15 w,w.00,ryliowwuro�.omn i III 11111111 liii1I MERS Modified Form 3048 01/01 14301 WA WOO O O A D+ 1 2+ 1 5 Law. • • NON - UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lender further covenant and agree as follows: 22. Acceleration; Remedies. Lender shall give notice to Borrower prior to acceleration following Borrower's breach of any covenant or agreement in this Security Instrument (but not prior to acceleration under Section 18 unless Applicable Law provides otherwise). The notice shall specify: (a) the default; (b) the action required to cure the default; (c) a date, not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given to Borrower, by which the default must be cured; and (d) that failure to cure the default on or before the date specified in the notice may result in acceleration of the sums secured by this Security Instrument and sale of the Property at public auction at a date not less than 120 days in the future. The notice shall further inform Borrower of the right to reinstate after acceleration, the right to bring a court action to assert the non- existence of a default or any other defense of Borrower to acceleration and sale, and any other matters required to be included in the notice by Applicable Law. If the default is not cured on or before the date specified in the notice, Lender at its option, may require immediate payment In full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument without further demand and may invoke the power of sale and/or any other remedies permitted by Applicable Law. Lender shall be entitled to collect all expenses incurred in pursuing the remedies provided in this Section 22, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of title evidence. If Lender invokes the power of sale, Lender shall give written notice to Trustee of the occurrence of an event of default and of Lender's election to cause the Property to be sold. Trustee and Lender shall take such action regarding notice of sale and shall give such notices to Borrower and to other persons as Applicable Law may require. After the time required by Applicable Law and after publication of the notice of sale, Trustee, without demand on Borrower, shall sell the Property at public auction to the highest bidder at the time and place and under the terms designated in the notice of sale in one or more parcels and in any order Trustee determines. Trustee may postpone sale of the Property for a period or periods permitted by Applicable Law by public announcement. at the time and place fixed in the notice of sale. Lender or Its designee may purchase the Property at any sale. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser Trustee's deed conveying the Property without any covenant or warranty, expressed or implied. The recitals in the Trustee's deed shall be prima facie evidence of the truth of the statements made therein. Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale in the following order: (a) to all expenses of the sale, including, but not limited to, reasonable Trustee's and attorneys' fees; (b) to all sums secured by this Security Instrument; and (c) any excess to the person or persons legally entitled to it or to the clerk of the superior court of the county in which the sale took place. 23. Reconveyance.. Upon payment of all sums secured by this Security Instrument, Lender shall request Trustee to reconvey the Property and shall surrender this Security Instrument and all notes evidencing debt secured by this Security Instrument to Trustee. Trustee shall reconvey the Property without warranty to the person or persons legally entitled to it. Such person or persons shall pay any recordation costs and the Trustee's fee for preparing the reconveyance. 24. Substitute Trustee. In accordance with Applicable Law, Lender may from time to time appoint a successor trustee to any Trustee appointed hereunder who has ceased to act. Without conveyance of the Property, the successor trustee shall succeed to all the title, power and duties conferred upon Trustee herein and by Applicable 25. Use of Property. The Property is not used principally for agricultural purposes. 26. Attorneys' Fees. Lender shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in any action or proceeding to construe or enforce any term of this Security Instrument. The term "attorneys' fees ", whenever used in this Security Instrument, shall include without limitation attorneys' fees incurred by Lender in any bankruptcy proceeding or on appeal. Washington Deed of Trust-Single Family - Fannie Mae/Freddle Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 13 of 15 www.canpUlncaomw.com MERS Modified Form 3048 01/01 14101WA 01100 M t 1 5 11 pp��2002094.014 1JAN17 DOpN T Witnesses: • • ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTE CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW. BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts and agrees to the terms and covenants contained in this Security Instrument and in any Rider executed by Borrower and recorded with it. Washington Deed of 71.ustSingle Family - Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC. — Page 14 of 15 mrw.eortplimonoureaaom A 41111 e gin 7 6 ;17 LE; I O!' OLEY (Seal) - Borrower (Printed Name) (Seal) - Borrower (Printed Name) (Seal) - Borrower (Printed Name) (Seal) - Borrower (Printed Name) MFRS Modified Form 3048 O1/01 14101 WA 06100 20060522002094.015 State of Washington County of KING •I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JEFFREY R FOLEY and HARMONY J FOLEY [name of person] is the person who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that (he/she/they) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her /their) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 5 19 i (Seal) • • ANN G 111 ; ) NOTggy 9 N PU8 UG ' O: f 'h1 °F WASN... - i0 § ss.: 11111101 111111 ' &(c, to ofOftice), �� nn t `� e4 Name] Place of Residence of Notary Public) Washington Deed of Trust -Single Family - Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT — THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC. Page 15 of 15 wwWAemptisnppfpmfe. 1 i MERS Modified Form 3048 01/01 14301 WA coma 20060522002094.016 1/. JAN 1 7 100? 4ELOPNNT THIS ADJUSTABLE RATE RIDER is made this 17th day of May, 2006, and is incorporated into and shall be deemed to amend and supplement the Mortgage, Deed of Trust, or Security Deed (the "Security Instrument ") of the same date given by the undersigned (the "Borrower ") to secure Borrower's Adjustable Rate Note (the "Note ") to SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a corporation (the "Lender") of the same date and covering the Property described in the Security Instrument and located at THIS NOTE CONTAINS PROVISIONS ALLOWING FOR CHANGES IN MY INTEREST RATE AND MY MONTHLY PAYMENT. INCREASES IN THE INTEREST RATE WILL RESULT IN HIGHER PAYMENTS. DECREASES IN THE INTEREST RATE WILL RESULT IN LOWER PAYMENTS. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS. In addition to the covenants and agreements made in the Security Instrument, Borrower and Lender further covenant and agree as follows: A. INTEREST RATE AND MONTHLY PAYMENT CHANGES The Note provides for an initial interest rate of 8.250% The Note provides for changes in the interest rate and the monthly payments, as follows: 4. INTEREST RATE AND MONTHLY PAYMENT CHANGES (A) Change Dates (B) The Index • ADJUSTABLE RATE RIDER 14011 MACADAM RD S, TUKWILA, WA 98168 (Property Address) ReetivE6.01 r JAN 17 2001 DEVELOPMENT Loan No.: 0144654761 The interest rate I will pay may change on the first day of June, 2011 and on that day every 12 month thereafter. Each date on which my interest rate could change is called a "Change Date." Beginning with the first Change Date, my interest rate will be based on an Index. The "Index" is: THE AVERAGE OF INTERBANK OFFERED RATES FOR ONE YEAR U.S. DOLLAR DENOMINATED DEPOSITS IN THE LONDON MARKET ( "LIBOR "), AS PUBLISHED IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. The most recent Index figure available as of the date: ® 45 days ❑ 15 days ❑ first business day of the month immediately preceding the month in which the Change Date occurs ❑ before each Change Date is called the "Current Index." If the Index is no longer available, the Note Holder will choose a new Index that is based upon comparable information. The Note Holder will give. me notice of this choice. Multistate Adjustable Rate Rider - Single Family Proprietary W0211 I 11111 1111 Rev. 03 6 � C 4 + + 4 RECEIVED JAN 1 7 2007 (C) Calculation of Changes COMMUNITY DEVELOPM - (Please check box for interest -only period.) ® The "Interest -Only Period" is the period from the date of this Note through June, 2016. For the Interest -Only Period, after calculating my new interest rate as provided below, the Note Holder will then determine the amount of the monthly payment that would be sufficient to pay the interest which accrues on the unpaid principal of my loan. The result of this calculation will be the new amount of my monthly payment. The period after the Interest -Only Period is the Amortization Period. For the Amortization Period, after calculating, my new interest rate as provided below, the Note Holder will then determine the amount of the monthly payment that would be sufficient to repay the unpaid principal that I am expected to owe at the Change Date in full on the Maturity Date at my new interest rate in substantially equal payments. The result of this calculation will be the new amount of my monthly payment. Before each Change Date, the Note Holder will calculate my new interest rate by adding Two and 250 /1000ths percentage points. (2.250 %) to the Current Index. The Note Holder will then round the result of this addition to the nearest one-eighth of one percentage point (0.125 %). Subject to the limits stated in Section 4(D) below, this rounded amount will be my new interest rate until the next Change Date. • The Note Holder will then determine the amount of the monthly payment that would be sufficient to repay the unpaid principal I am expected to owe at the Change Date in full on the Maturity Date at my new interest rate in substantially equal payments. The result of this calculation will be the new amount of my monthly payment. (D) Limits on Interest Rate Changes (Please check appropriate boxes.) ❑ (1) ❑ (2) There will be no maximum limit on interest rate changes. • (3) My interest rate will never be greater than 13.250 %. ® (4) My interest rate will never be less than 2.250 %. ❑ (5) The interest rate I am required to pay at the first Change Date will not be greater than % or less than %. ❑ (6) My interest rate will never be increased or decreased on any single Change Date by more than percentage points from the rate of interest T have been paying for the • • preceding period. ® (7) The interest rate I am required to pay the first Change Date will not be greater than 13.250% or less than 3.250 %. Thereafter, my interest rate will never be increased or decreased on any single Change Date by more than 2.000 percentage points from the rate of interest I have been paying for the preceding 12 months. My interest rate will never be greater than 13.250 %. Multistate Adjustable Rate Rider - Single Famt y Proprietary W0211 IT 0llll1110.111 iuirrnMTi1m' ) 20060522002094.018 (F) Notice of Changes RECEIVED 1 JAN 1 7 2001 COMMUNITY My new interest rate will become effective on each Change Date. I will pay the amount SENT monthly payment beginning on the first monthly payment date after the Change Date until the amount of my monthly payment changes again. (E) Effective Date of Changes The Note Holder will deliver or mail to me a notice of any changes in my interest rate and the amount of my monthly payment before the effective date of any change. The notice will include information required by law to be given to me and also the title and telephone number of a person who will answer any question 1 may have regarding the notice. B. TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY OR A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN BORROWER Section 18 of the Security Instrument is amended to read as follows: Transfer of the Property or a Beneficial Interest in Borrower. As used in this Section 18, "Interest in the Property" means any legal or beneficial interest in the Property, including, but not limited to, those beneficial interests transferred in a bond for deed, contract for deed, installment sales contract or escrow agreement, the intent of which is the transfer of the title by Borrower at a future date to a purchaser. If all or any part of the Property or any Interest in the Property is sold or transferred (or if a Borrower is not a natural person and a beneficial interest in Borrower is sold or transferred) without Lender's prior written consent, Lender may require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by Applicable Law. Lender also shall not exercise this option if. (a) Borrower causes to be submitted to Lender information required by Lender to evaluate the intended transferee as if a new loan were being made to the transferee; and (b) Lender reasonably determines that Lender's security will not be impaired by the loan assumption and that the risk of a breach of any covenant or agreement in this Security Instrument is acceptable to Lender. To the extent permitted by Applicable Law, Lender may charge a reasonable fee as a condition to Lender's consent to the loan assumption. Lender also may require the transferee to sign an assumption agreement that is acceptable to Lender and that obligates the transferee to keep all the promises and agreements made in the Note and in this Security Instrument. Borrower will continue to be obligated under the Note and this Security Instrument unless Lender releases Borrower in writing. If Lender exercises the option to require immediate payment in full, Lender shall give Borrower notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a period of not less than 30 days from the date the notice is given in accordance with Section 15 within which Borrower must pay all sums secured by this Security Instrument. If Borrower fails to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any remedies permitted by this Security Instrument without further notice or demand on Borrower. Multistate Adjustable Rate Rider - Single Family Proprietary W0211 G (Signatures on Following Page) i �I�flll 111111 20060522002094.019 BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts and agrees to the terms and covenants contained in this Adjustable Rate Rider. Multistate Adjustable Rate Rider - Single Family Proprietary W0211 I (Seal) - Borrower (Seal) (Seal) - Borrower - Borrower I + 1 Ili 111011,11 illl 1 + RECEIVED JAN 1 7 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20060522002094.020 (Seal) - Borrower 1 0001 • 1 -4 FAMILY RIDER (Assignment of Rents) THIS 1-4 FAMILY RIDER is made this 17th day of May, 2006, and is incorporated into and shall be deemed to amend and supplement the Mortgage, Deed of Trust, or Security Deed (the "Security Instrument ") of the same date given by the undersigned (the "Borrower ") to secure Borrower's Note to SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. (the "Lender ") of the same date and covering the Property described in the Security Instrument and located at: 14011 MACADAM RD S, TUKWILA, WA 98168 (Property Address] 1-4 FAMILY COVENANTS. In addition to the covenants and agreements made in the Security Instrument, Borrower and Lender further covenant and agree as follows: A. ADDITIONAL PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE SECURITY INSTRUMENT. In addition to the Property described in Security Instrument, the following items now or hereafter attached to the Property to the extent they are fixtures are added to the Property description, and shall also constitute the Property covered by the Security Instrument: building materials, appliances and goods of every nature whatsoever now or hereafter located in, on, or used, or intended to be used in connection with the Property, including, but not limited to, those for the purposes of supplying or distributing heating, cooling, electricity, gas, water, air and light, fire prevention and extinguishing apparatus, security and access control apparatus, plumbing, bath tubs, water heaters, water closets, sinks, ranges, stoves, refrigerators, dishwashers, disposals, washers, dryers, awnings, storm windows, storm doors, screens, blinds, shades, curtains and curtain rods, attached mirrors, cabinets, paneling and attached floor coverings, all of which, including replacements and additions thereto, shall be deemed to be and remain a part of the Property covered by the Security Instrument. All of the foregoing together with the Property described in the Security Instrument (or the leasehold estate if the Security Instrument is on a leasehold) are referred to in this 1-4 Family Rider and the Security Instrument as the `Property." B. USE OF PROPERTY; COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. Borrower shall not seek, agree to or make a change in the use of the Property or its zoning classification, unless Lender has agreed in writing to the change. Borrower shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations and requirements of any governmental body applicable to the Property. Multistate 1-4 Family Rider — Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT THE COMPWANCE SOURCE, INC.— Page 1 of 3 www.compliagcsomoacom id 11,1 loptilliji lH Loan No.: 0144654761 MIN: 100010401446547610 Form 3170 01/01 r3WMU MOD Rs. 11/M + 0 0 C 7+ 1 + 3 20060522002094.021 RECEIVED rJA N 17 2001 DEV COMMUNITY notifilin • C. SUBORDINATE LIENS. Except as permitted by federal law, Borrower shall not allow any lien inferior to the Security Instrument to be perfected against the Property without Lender's prior written permission. D. RENT LOSS INSURANCE. Borrower shall maintain insurance against rent loss in addition to the other hazards for which insurance is required by Section 5. E. "BORROWER'S RIGHT TO REINSTATE" DELETED. Section 19 is deleted. F. BORROWER'S OCCUPANCY. Unless Lender and Borrower otherwise agree in writing, Section 6 concerning Borrower's occupancy of the Property is deleted. G. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES. Upon Lender's request after default, Borrower shall assign to Lender all leases of the Property and all security deposits made in connection with leases of the Property. Upon the assignment, Lender shall have the right to modify, extend or terminate the existing leases and to execute new leases, in Lender's sole discretion. As used in this paragraph 0, the word "lease" shall mean "sublease" if the Security Instrument is on a leasehold. H. ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS; APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER; LENDER IN POSSESSION. Borrower absolutely and unconditionally assigns and transfers to Lender all the rents and revenues ( "Rents ") of the Property, regardless of to whom the Rents of the Property are payable. Borrower authorizes Lender or Lender's agents to collect the Rents, and agrees that each tenant of the Property shall pay the Rents to Lender or Lender's agents. However, Borrower shall receive the Rents until (i) Lender has given Borrower notice of default pursuant to Section 22 of the Security Instrument and (ii) Lender has given notice to the tenant(s) that the Rents are to be paid to Lender or Lender's agent. This assignment of Rents constitutes an absolute assignment and not an assignment for additional security only. If Lender gives notices of default to Borrower: (i) all Rents received by Borrower shall be held by Borrower as trustee for the benefit of Lender only, to be applied to the sums secured by the Security Instrument; (ii) Lender shall be entitled to collect and receive all of the Rents of the Property; (iii) Borrower agrees that each tenant of the Property shall pay all Rents due and unpaid to Lender or Lender's agents upon Lender's written demand to the tenant; (iv) unless applicable law provides otherwise, all Rents collected by Lender or Lender's agents shall be applied first to the costs of taking control of and managing the Property and collecting the Rents, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, receiver's fees, premiums on receiver's bonds, repair and maintenance costs, insurance premiums, taxes, assessments and other charges on the Property, and then to the sums secured by the Security Instrument; (v) Lender, Lender's agents or any judicially appointed receiver shall be liable to account for only those Rents actually received; and (vi) Lender shall be entitled to have a receiver appointed to take possession of and manage the Property and collect the Rents and profits derived from the Property without any showing as to the inadequacy of the Property as security. If the Rents of the Property are not sufficient to cover the costs of taking control of and managing the Property and of collecting the Rents any funds expended by Lender for such purposes shall become indebtedness of Borrower to Lender secured by the Security Instrument pursuant to Section 9. Multistate 1-4 Family Rider — Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT —THE COMPLIANCE SOURCE, INC..— Page 2 of 3 awv. omioanamurcaoom II AI1I1IA1llplll,ll Form 3170 01/01 1450:11411 WOO Rev 11/04 llHffiAi 0 0 C 7+ 2+ 3 20060522002094.022 RECE MED 1 JAN 17 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Borrower represents and warrants that Borrower has not executed any prior assignment of the Rents and has not performed, and will not perform, any act that would prevent Lender from exercising its rights under this paragraph. Lender, or Lender's agents or a judicially appointed receiver, shall not be required to enter upon, take control of or maintain the Property before or after giving notice of default to Borrower. However, Lender, or Lender's agents or a judicially appointed receiver, may do so at any time when a default occurs. Any application of Rents shall not cure or waive any default or invalidate any other right or remedy of Lender. This assignment of Rents of the Property shall terminate when all the sums secured by the Security Instrument are paid in full. I. CROSS - DEFAULT PROVISION. Borrower's default or breach under any note or agreement in which Lender has an interest shall be a breach under the Security Instrument and Lender may invoke any of the remedies permitted by the Security Instrument. BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts and agrees to the terms and covenants contained in this 1-4 Family Rider. (Seal) - Borrower RECEIvEn 'JAN 17 2001; D EVELOPMENT (Seal) - Borrower (Seal) (Seal) - Borrower - Borrower [Sign Original Only) Multistate 1-4 Family Rider— Faanle MaelFreddle Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT Form 3170 01!01 II =1 HE COMPLIANCE SOUIICL+, [NC.— 3 of 11SWMU ssroo a.. rr;W ww.oarroliencasourpe.com + 111Piall 4 0 5 4 1111 + 0 0 C 7+ 3+ 3 20060522002094.023 9605029001 FOOD Vt ATO CM 0312113 �SOOF -B ERAPESC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 RECORDER'S cew 11PICATE MU FOR EC= 146 a __EAT OF -,. . it N SOW 1,21_S PAS // AT DE REQUEST SMARTY ME%90 017•■••t N8 87 357iL` UNE � 'SSrb'45'E 104015 1 1fM a TEE ROAM 1 530 CO 1 +2•m]/ MSS i4Lmt LEGEND • - ME T 075.5, 5 CAP 15{,7540 15{,7540 • - 701110 5511215 MNQOOIT . /0 p - FOOO ROAR 4 CAK•.. -• "' 0 - SNT LARGE 2K- M. SE1 /4, SE1 /4, SEC 15, TWP 23N, R 4E, W.M. SURVEYOR'S CER11PICATt 145 MAP OSCECST 1114E10ET5 A 540571! MME IT 5E CO Fla MT OQCIDII N ONIFTMIAMS MIN 116 MOUPEINDITS A TIE 'x5.71 1 1110 ACT AT M RECIEST OF MARTY MmUN 1/16111 UNE 71 sf' Tnx Lor jf • scum CE OF 111 1100 715 � :•,., y2/ S POSTIDODI7 6 ECM= 205 MSS 0015 A'tOtDET TEM) • • NR ..// Ifif. etai ON0SO29U01 MOO SURFACE IONIPFNT TER- ROM 115a1•O01 rocs FIE ,7110E ....., NuSE 7702/1+77 ccOs 2/2/50.151 5 AF xr�Ck1+ Err 1�MI4O 7] 4 1 7 RSI PSE TOU142-010.2 • • • •0511'21' MOUTH S' 51.11. . uRvEYORB NOYES • DE LAM IOM= TO 1550 S STUMP • ME COUNTY Nt s•4 STATE Of 1S NO OOTI® AS FOLOM T TIE ONTO 150 MT S 114 SOUMAST C AR7ER OF TIE SOUTHEAST COMM" K MOTs 12 1011B• 27 51511 SN4GE 4 EAST. TIE.. 1111010 O 15515. 0.211510( L1f0 WITT OF TIACAOAN MAO N*M O 00777 TNT KRIM USES 1011 SE SOUTHEAST 6440125 d M SCUTS- EAST SUM1ER Of RCTIa 13. 150191 23 NORM RAMOC • EAST. Ell. N RSC CNNTE. 4691001. COMM AS EC1O0A 0515•110 AT M MITER SECTOR V M SEMI Ix OF OCIMORETT LOT I. N SAO MOTION I, RTO 1111 SOT 1111 51 111 NMQ GAM COMM MAO MAIM TITS 1 ;40]x95 • ALOE SAD SOT UTE. 7215 FTEt THOME S54 . 4571 C 110.7E 1ST 10 A 0010 S DIRK DOME NC10 A COME TO TIC DOET MEM A ItN7RI5 S 61 FEET. AM ARC METMSa14.75 FEET 1O EE TRUE 101T OF 15'5510 S OM 241I2 C011111110 EOM SAD MVE M MC 015115 0' 2581 sat TENS N 551771 • 1!051 MST 111 A FOOT a M 101114 LR5[ OF 2•/O 50515055 ICS I. 1010112 11 174•72• • 377 FEET 201 DE ROOT C• 2100002 THENCE 11106•72 E fa FEET THOME R Mae 110.80 FEET TO A PONT FEN ENS S 01103 MOM THE TIRE PONT S 1556114 TOTS N 15510 11.42 PER TO RAS1S a 5,52 FEET. M MC 0 TT 6 OO 7 T M 1OQ ILL'01 155 4 1 [ "1 1p� 4 3 FRT molts• 11TIb1Tt1E\TRO TO A Part ON TIC 177155E LEE C1 SAD . 1"421 4.15E 110. Sa OQ7 7 f�1 7111111 C Part Or 2/15(11.72/ 54010 MORTiOLr 1 SAO TEST 771( 71 FEE TO DC 2251E S TE *1150 .Tl(®T 2/74104 +EAT 1E'45MSsarr S SAO Naif150 2Q('V CE .: SCFOEAST OWE= 8F TE NIOU.ST a >ECOO 11S. 117409. 27 NORM ROOT 41ASC2Y4r.0I1Aa{Mrr. Ne s 15SV42• c 1/77'521 ,_- TIERCE 1120412 E TM FEET 11115115 4 N''I'I IOW 125 F¢T SOUTy,1• TIC EDEFR S 112/•4500 #0E111020 to HET 0 TIC P0111•OF MOROSE ,• THIMU5•0 F67 0 2C ANTI 20E OF DE WIT 4157 Fat OF SAO sp1TEAST DARER S TIE S0OIEAST OU S Y.OIp M. 115119. O NOM SALE 4 LASE NIA. N ONG 01514(15 100410101 SET LAM K-NAL 71401.1 n C s�U FEET 2/F SC'aT 405.7 FEEL OF SAO SECI154. HEW EAST 6 a1RE5 SET MRS 25-044. 1 •• 171114' 17.11 UST Or COMM •' N57N545R 1 /16th i .:I. (A10R15A 80403. RES1NC110113. 17507.111$ AID 11A2415041 CASTE . .,•• • 01702115. 5 50915. ITY 415 E7 TR ROT swots 5v1 as 511456 E 1141951® M•IO•1A5D. RmIYAT1aS a 41.11515 • PATENTS OR II 4512 WTIO10103 117 510NIEE 151576. MIN EOM CUM CO 1110E TO 11M795 • ANY. NOT NOT paw pltQt•IS 5157.154 1117111 TIME. COCO a K0RA SMNI :01415 a 0200101: M 1: ROM NCSOC.EA41C a �f09x1s E Orestes WANT. ME 4m: 11M =VT AS 1OCIJI• sass or AEA' 1acc•ci a 9•7.X'561 .1572/705 • S. t0lVEETIr IHD PEO EI MEM 11•Ca CC r nu 41COlm MO 1040115 MST 1. Alfa 957155 A IOW 4 O 5 50. MNIRW*12 120105,120007 510. ION . PREPAIQD.FO RT1E O}iu2R x15 f Y •110•••2 •110•••2 SIN OSS NOT OTIDD TO NIT 1654* b sous c• iT 25111540/ 110111• • : 7. TO SURVEY 102 RECERTOCATN« IT swop= NOOK 31 4011T. .• •_ 5 ALL LOCATIONS sem m m ME Mme 0lTMM9L 51'9151.72 140045 00.7. 154.665 0111510 5E M. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OP RECORD (TAX LOT 35) 1 /7 BOYD & ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED 13039 6th AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98168 (206) 241 -2207 4. 109 11 F64D 555.72 (MIAOW 15 114 1/16th • '� . .•.:;. • FOUND - • •:ae7.i•]9't y' pile ', \1 5Jt 4 Z2 :..23 R 16F BURVEY'' MAR1f MECHLUNG 0411 010 512 CRAFTMC (206) 937 - 8819 C11 ®11 RIB 051E APR.. 1*16e t' -SO a 116' 1172 -0 SEES. r. t 1 1 ' ` 1 : • - t FOUND 1/2" REBAR AND CAP LSO 15023 OnCW FOUND 1/2 ". REBAR AND CAP L$# 15023 0.10'5 X- 6.02'E 15.70' 0 • • • • • SB7'48 "E POINT UNE REEBAR� 1 /16th UNE . fi 360.57' 10232 DEED _ - AFf'4791157 1A2 DEED Z ' - T 'G \ • ;AF/ 7712080i23(HELD) ,o • � i DEEO� 7712080123 .= i� • • ` r∎ i .• . ' v J 363' OEEiT AFB 7911..: FOUND LEJWOHG 366.60ELD•A AFp 77t 57 �080t23 112' IR9?I PIPE FENCE 0.4"... 366.0 COMPUTI�. :b.8 NORTH CC-WIRE .FENCE ' .148.2.`• _ SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTH 280 • • ' , ` ; • ' 375.0'(DEED HELO) 0 0 0 • • . R'1 REBAR 1.05 J SET LARGE PK -NAIL 40.21' EAST OF CORNER SET LARGE PK -NAIL 17.60• EAST OF CORNER OF SECTION Ti: ToWNSIBP 23 NORTH. WASHINGTON. LYING WEST OF MACADAI EXCEPT NAT PORTION LYING 1MTHIN 11 EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15. TOWNS KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DESCRIBEC BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF T IN SAID SECTION 15. KITH THE WEST L NUMBER 2; THENCE N 40'20'25 W ALONG SAID NI THENCE S 84'48'25' W 110.72 FEET 7( THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO NE RICH ARC DISTANCE OF 24.35 FEET TO 1HE DESCRIPTOR THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CUR% THENCE N 8517'33" W 180.87 FEET TT SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, 74141 POINT OF BE(:NNINO; THENCE S 10'44'32' E 108 THENCE N 8704'51" E 197.80 FEET TC FROM NE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 0855'10'W 81.42 FEET TO ' DESCRIPTOR EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF NE SOUTH! SECTION 15i; P 23 NORTH. RAI AHD OF C LOT 1 OF SAID BEGINNING AT TNT• INTERSECTION OF 7 IN SAID SEC1101f•15. WITH NE WEST 1. THENCE N 4010'23' W ALONG SAID WI FEET T( :.'THENCE ALONG CURVE TO NE RICH DISTANCE,43F 24.35 FEET: ' THEN .S 0835'10' E 81.42 FEET: THENCE: N 87134'51"- •r 1bl- TS'FEET•.TO Amp' CLARK ROAD. SOUTHERLY 77 F1 THENCE NORT ILLY ALONG SAID WEST .17CCEPT BEGINNING AT_NE 1P(WES1 •••• SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF NE SOUTHER RANGE •EAST; :W.4A.: JN. KING COUNTY THENCE S 8938'42' E 3711%11E0; THENCE S 10'44'32' E 125 FEET; 1i3ENCE N 89'98 II•TO A POINT 1's NENCE NORTH 125 FEET It 1H Ta(CEPT THi'Sa1ZK d0 FEET • ' .I O JT{EAST QUARTER OF THE RiNCE 4 EAST, W.M.. IN KING COUNTY EXCEPT THE SOUTHjB FEET OF.'THE 1 +0 1/16th 4%4, 0 41, y r_ 370.56' 1487'48'41 t AN 11 2001 DEVEL 1PU 4 • Applicant's Signatur ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 125 The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Certificate of Availability ( "Certificate "). 1. This Certificate of Water Availability is valid only for the real property referenced herein for the sole purpose of submission to the City of -r0, ( "City"). This Certificate is issued at the request of the City, and is not assignable or transferable to any other party. Further, no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency or as a third party beneficiary or otherwise. 2. The District makes no representations, express or implied, that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals, and authorizations from the City or any other applicable land use jurisdiction or governmental agency necessary before applicant can utilize the utility service which is the subject of this Certificate. 3. As of the date of the issuance of this Certificate, the District has water available to provide utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate, and the utility systems exist or may be extended by the applicant to provide service to such property. However, the issuance of this Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant or the City, and the issuance of this Certificate may not be relied upon and does not constitute the District's guarantee that water utility service will be available to the real property at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 4. Application for and the possible provision of District utility service to the real property which is the subject of this certificate shall be subject to and conditioned upon the availability of water service to the real property at the time of such application, as well as all federal, state, and District laws, ordinances, policies and regulations in effect at the time of such application for utility service, including conservation, water restrictions, and other policies and regulations then in effect. District Representative W- a-A_WV\--e Date Date 9 RECEIVED 'JAN 17 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT gm?Vi:, ' frF1' 4' t4V; p!• I' VC+ i,:. u:': ngi+l'+., ;nYligr.';'grt *r� yak�o; +�1€,N?yfg, K ' !"' I}?' !.�V�f!'7�,'st "� VSt �i..4�t�t.nd"i ���,iFilogt„ r i N,„ , °L P t9 " f' .Vp 4� mi li. N,���Ivi� r! l} Ville {} � e;l ' Il�,a� �j i�l t 7.tt ?n. IMN.r i lfF L' ^l 1 l 1 rnl rt r EttiT ,)1(flBl� IT{ 1, , "4i1iP�trti� �A�� t� ,d i( � Y a. W .4.f e 4i �u '� Ifl 1��1? iLCd1 �i. a ; � '� ^ Site address (attach map and,legal description showing hydrant location and size of main): yO/ AI • ■ aJ �� �u y � � A p � e. nnra-wi�m� �w� i�` }I. „Y RZERI P , �. n f "..U; V d € w U'� �'` �VUN! , d..r�l � 1°`NTr��;`.�d1 ' �kcSJ„ , f R �r8f!3 ! �w �� �1 lw ViLn!! � Yl'a � r 1 r � Jt,n Name; Addre, s Address: I (7 S ) i'v .7- i >d e w,uij PAS � Phone: , Phone: d( 77 - ? plpp ]! 6 (' 4 1 yyy 9 h T' R8 f 1 + Y v t� p.� }fY�'Y 7€� di ( � q t, ' f ���Ty4�9lVp' � ' 11 `��211tlIlV. ..0 nl P [I' .�4�' 1 orda n;�,'a�.d . r '�' 2 l:�i i U�.r:7 A'ng g Y �'IN 4 �.I , w ,n'fl ll'�diYw Own '•r /Agbnt Si c' ature Name! CITY. OF TUKWIL4 Community Development Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 981 This certificate is for the purposes of: ❑ Residential Building Permit ❑ Commercial /industrial Building Permit ❑ Rezone Estimated number of service connections and water meter size(s): Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure is Area is served by (Water Utility District): 1. The proposed' project is .,within 2. 3. (Use separate sheet if more mom is needed) I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. t (0. i k)&4 7orcLL !�(S7 Agency/ hone 2_06- . Z- ? qs ( CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Required only if outside City of Tukwila water district ❑ Preliminary Plat I1.il°' PERMIT NO.: ft. Short Subdivision ❑ Other RECEIVED 'JAN 1 7 2007 Date ❑ No improve ments required. The'i mprovements required to upgrade the water system to bring It Into compliance with the utilities' compr plan or to meet the minimum flow' requirements of the project before connection and to meet the State cross connection control requirements: 16C-k vh 4- Fe, f D42, e-1 0 * e-v 4 -si't c o •i %' .. e `e4. Based upon the improvements listed above, water ca at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a veloci 5. .Water availability: ❑ Acceptable service can be provided to this project ceptabie service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in Item B -2 are met. ❑ System is not capable of providing service to this project. Permit Center /Build: g Division: 106 =J070 Public Works Department: 206-433-0179 Planning Division: 206-431-3670 I be available at the site with a flo as documented by the attached This certificate is not valid without Water District No. 125's attachment entitled "Attachment to Certificate of Water Availability." 9 It DE O IT (City /County) of /I q culations. — zfc Date — x --07 Part A: (To Be Completed by Applicant) Purpose of Certificate: ❑ ilding Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Other Lid Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone Proposed Use: Residential Single Family ❑ Residential Multi - Family ❑ Commercial ❑ Other Applicants Name: r L, Phone: Property Address or Approximai Location: Tax Lot Number: i 4o / 41-4ic d d .�. 15 304- - Q03 5 Legal Description(Attach Map and Legal Description if necessary): ( 4 /) >6_,b Part B: (To Be Completed by Sewer Agency) 1. •l a. Sewer rvice will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer �feet-#Fenrrthe site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR ❑ b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and /or ❑ (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and /or ❑ (3) other (describe): 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) ❑ a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan, OR ❑ b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. ❑ a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the District, OR ❑ b. Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: PERMIT: $ a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: -V To 8F- SST GFC: $ SFC: $ UNIT: $ TOTAL: $ 4EX2 (Subject to Change on January 1st) King County/METRO Capacity Charge: Currently, $4250.70 /residential equivalent, will be billed directly by King County after connection to the sewer system. (Subject to change by King Co /Metro without notice.) b. Easements: Required ❑ May be Required c. Other: ? fl'�iN G " 'oRr. A.. CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON-AVAILABILITY /Certificate of Sewer Availability 14816 Military Roalouth P.O. Box 69550 Tukwila, WA 98168 Phone: (206) 242 -3236 Fax: (206) 242 -1527 OR ❑ Certificate of Sewer Non - Availability I hereby certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from the date o si• nature. Fc id (Zef 44 - 06. Title Date II • ATTACHMENT 10 VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON- AVAILABILITY The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Val Vue Sewer District ( "District ") Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non - Availability ( "Certificate "). 1. This Certificate is valid only for the real property referenced herein ( "Property"), which is in the District's service area, for the sole purpose of submission to the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, King County Department of Public Health, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Burien and/or City of SeaTac. This Certificate is between the District and the applicant only, and no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency, third -party beneficiary principles or otherwise. 2. This Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant and its successors and assigns, and does not constitute and may not be relied upon as the District's guarantee that sewer service will be available at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 3. As of the date of the District's signature on this Certificate, the District represents that sewer service is available to the Property through sewer systems that exist or that may be extended by the applicant. The District makes no other representations, express or implied, including without limitation that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations from King County, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Buries, City of SeaTac or any other governmental agency before the applicant can utilize the sewer service which is the subject of this Certificate. 4. If the District or the applicant must extend the District's sewer system to provide sewer service to the Property, the District or applicant may be required to obtain from the appropriate governmental agency the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations. In addition, the governmental agency may establish requirements that must be satisfied as a condition of granting any such permits, approvals or authorizations, which may make impractical or impossible the provision of sewer services to the Property. 5. Application for and possible provision of sewer service to the Property shall be subject to and conditioned upon availability of sewer service to the Property at the time of such application, and compliance with federal, state, local and District laws, ordinances, policies, and/or regulations in effect at the time of such application. I acknowledge that I have received the Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non - Availability and this Attachment, and fully understand the terms and conditions herein. kr, •K��.. MVE138 3Nf1 NO 1N10d 13S a Z 50' 30N33 3tl1M-'OON ,08.; HLHON 3$-U. H1f10S waON ,b'0 3ON3. S.9 3dId NOVI .Z /I ONINV31 0Nl04 Date aYS3a 3Nn NO 1NIOd 13S 3.81 • • " 1 ,L'9t l '031ld190J ,90•99£ £L1080Z (Sll6L Old 0330 ,£ Z 0 / s 1 0 at 0 0 t 4 C Name: CITY OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED 1 JAN 17 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit Center /Build Division: 106031 =3670 Public Works Department: 206-433-0179 Planning Division: 206-431-3670 ' " "W"{Wi''.e q 6fF( 4�7DQt". q •tt '+isv glo : :;'..:x:pgi9nary 7; •Yr�BYkt".q'I �1•� ••,�+.y1 °.d1 �l,,7, �'� ^'�'� 7.i,Ntrii ITS ' ,� (' iC ,•rTVy/:l, �t `�° cq;r�•r ,, � �+]��, j�f P , 14 y1pi s ( I Q 7 Y f ,`1 t l a 1 ), l i n }, P 1 i { i l r ti• i I 0, I I, + f i J� yam! I f 1. x } 4 4 yI I 1� �' Y[ �9KL1CI.ilrtalY9z4A4�d7M�N'3Mit ir+�^ iK,311.�,�^�M71�?Nf'r• i�i< . 9�R; ��ft6Ft\, �:' y') �„ �(' t��nUG�1�1fM�Y�AdItLtH1' tt+ ��l�aiU��' �; ����d��r <t {r'I�t% n } %�CYi�af��9!�I(.ti`tr,r, "ryi�t�.a:,T7,l;�h• It• F�1.J�� Site address (attach map and Jags) description showing hydrant location and Din of main); "tit b ,50 L/O / 44 4 L,1 AI -�r�' ��, � U +{ • t E f '� �• �j �'�yy�ut;�pt�,l�N, �? n a-4'IAr�T:�d;�k.J';'r;��t "1�'a r ! t • � � b� :n��'l10'�blilr�i?��wltul�Mll� � i�:�' � �' '� � �a, iti °..st C.�ds�. Ic•G?, -Jt,n P dn,,,� — Rx.,. t . i N. t • Name: Addre s Address: Phone: 0 9 0 �o r 77 c� 3 - g itjde /144-44 / Phone: This certificate is for the purposes of: ❑ Residential Building Permit ❑ Commercial /industrial Building Permit ❑ Rezone CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Required only if outside City of Tukwila water district ❑ Preliminary Plat Estimated number of service connections and water meter size(s): Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure is ft. PERMIT NO.: tvrr 9 /' 12 Short Subdivision ❑ Other Area is served : by (Water Utility District): i f , hRf t �1`l'Uldh•�� i yr9, ,��f �,��p1�LJ��I r t 1rg� v ra yf, �y� Y 7 )t�•,x �I °tf n ����° N II n ny�Gr t�'f!� e }} tIg1,• v �`M �Y �I '�e'(iP'�nP,: MPAI .1 1d S�itm1 �d15 , Y7�Y 7� 11'���NO�y�`�`.��r. ArefAs�pid�� nt�^ci��� ;n�14. � +1"le'��v ���.�t gX.. h �Mu � f 1 h s m.• , lu f Jw�C�ah wa,, 310 Own r/A 0r1 st, Wiett 1. The proposed project is within 2. Q No improvements required. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. Agency/ C©. �6 7147,2 - iS•r4 A ZC gency / hone Z o 6- z z— /S`ti /-o Date Date 3. The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring It Into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow' requirements of the project before connection and to meet the State cross connection control requirements: 6 OA r tb-12.- e-1 0. 4-*- S (•1 /S -Eta (Use separate sheet if more room is needed) 4. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of /14 I gpn at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of fps as documented by the attached calculations. 5. Water availability: Acceptable service can be provided to this project L— ceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in Item B - are met. 0 System is not capable of providing service to this project. This certificate is not valid without Water District No. 125's attachment entitled "Attachment to Certificate of Water Availability." (City /County) �t -- z ' —(545 Date - -p 04..-s- -07 • • Commitment No. 6364898 -1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE A CONTINUED RECEIVED 'JAN 1 71007 D EVE L OP p The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east W .M., in King County, Washington, lying west of Macadam Road South; . EXCEPT that portion lying within the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W .M., described as follows: Beginning •at the' intersection of the south line of Government Lot 1, In said Section 15, with the west line of the Jarries Clark County Road No. Z • 'thence north 40°2025" west along said west line, 72.55 feet thence south. 64 west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; - thence ,along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; . thence continuing along said cury e, an arc distance of 24.51 feet; thence north 85 °17'33" west 180 .67 feet to a point on the south line of said Government Lot 1, which is north 87°48'32" west 375 feet from the point of beginning; thence south 10 °44'32" east 106 feet; thence north _87°04'51" east 197.60 feet to a point which bears south 08 °5510" east from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence north 08 °5510" west 81.42 feet the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; EXCEPT that portion of the southeast quarter -of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M., and of Government Lot 1 of said Section 15, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Government Lot 1, in Section 15, with the west line of the James Clark County Road No. 2; thence north 40°20'25" west along said west line, 72.55 feet; thence south 64 °46'25" west 110.72 feet to a point of curve; -thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 93.52 feet, an arc distance of 24.35 feet; thence south 08 °55'10" east 81.42 feet; thence north 87°04'51" east 169.0 feet to a point On the westerly line of said James Clark County Road, southerly 72 feet from the point of beginning; thence northerly along said west line 72 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT beginning at the northwest corner of said north 280 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east, W.M.; 'thence south 89°56'42" east 378.6 feet; . thence south 10 °44'32" east 125 f eet; thence north 89°56'42° west to a point 125 feet south of the point of beginning; thence north 125 feet to the point of beginning; 'EXCEPT the south 80 feet of the north 205 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 north, Range 4 east,.W .M.; EXCEPT the south 75 feet of the west 408.7 feet of said section. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -SS Planner: (L €??CCA 1 >C File Number: t I 'VO' Application Complete (Dated IS I 0 7 ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: • or�►giNny, cmEGcurr CITY OF TUKWILA A F C SHORT Department of Community Development ` ✓� �� # �o l � SLAT 444 8/ (P -SS) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwilama.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: F Mt/ LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1 /1 'MI cA /) Q Q S Ira kw v/A kkm 9g /M LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. c: Name: Address: 9 1 "' s T vo i' l4 GUJ Phone: c20& 777-3281 FAX S s iij — t/7(/() PAPti 414 '725&6 E -mail: __ fiIfo Cow Signatur= ,' i PAPlanning FormsWpplicatbre \ShortPlat- 6- 06.doc, December 4, 2006 Date: /Z Check items submitted with application Information Required. 8 May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of. Public Works and/or Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (4 copies). '" ii 3. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permissio to''Enter Property (1 copy attached). 4. One set of all plans reduced to either 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ". �---„,. / �/ 5. Application Fee — up to 4 lots in LDR $585, other zones $1,170. - 5 to 9 lots in all zones $1,170. 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist (for projects with 5 -9 lots or cut/fill over 500 cubic yards see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 7. If the project requires SEPA review or involves a short plat of 5 —9 lots: Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Publjc .Notice- Sigre Specifications Handout). - 8. If the project involves a short • • • — 9 lots: Payment of a $100 mailin: .. - ee to the City of Tukwila or Provide one set of m • ' ' g labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 fee : ' the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. apartment ondos, trailer parks - -must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). 9. I t e project involves a short plat of 5 — 9 lots: If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 10. Title Report: must clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and encumbrances, must be dated within 45 days of application filing (two copies). X 11. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. 12. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (on'line at-- -..— ._ _. _ . caukwila.wa.us /dcd /dcdplan.htm) for additional information. 13. Printed computer plat closure or demonstrated mathematical plat closure on all lots, streets, alleys and boundaries. Allowable error of closure shall not exceed one foot in 5,000 feet. COMPLE I APPLICATION Ch1CKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. , City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). P:\Planning Forma \Applications\ShonPlat- 6- o6.doc, December 4, 2006 N/Q Check-items submitted with application Information Req a . May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of Public Works and/or Planning PLAT SURVEY: a template is available from the City in AutoCAD format / 14 (a) The plat survey must include the name of the plat, graphic scale, space for the City of Tukwila file number and north arrow. It shall be drawn with black ink in record of survey format and include the elements listed at TMC 17.04.060 A. This shall be stamped by the surveyor. ✓ (b) Legal descriptions of the existing and proposed lots. (c) All applicable certificates and approvals (listed on the template, see TMC 17.04.060). V (d) fisting and proposed lot lines shown solid with new lines called out and lot lines to be removed shown dashed. / �/ (e) Lot and block numbers beginning with the_number one (1) and numbered consecutively without omission or duplication. / 't/ (f) Total lot or parcel sizes and average width of each proposed lot (min 50 ft. for residential). v1 (g) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. N/ (h) Fire access lanes and turn - arounds per Fire Department standards. (i) Location of all tracts to be dedicated to any public or private purpose shall be distinguished from lots intended for general development with notes stating their purpose and limitations. '✓ (j) Locations of existing and proposed public street rights -of -way and private access easements. (k) Location, dimension and purpose of existing and proposed easements. Provide recorded documents which identify the nature and extent of existing easements. (I) Vicinity Map with site location, does not have to be to scale. LANDSCAPE PLAN: for 5 -9 lot short plats or Planned Residential Developments only 1 5 (a) Landscape planting plan stamped as . - :. . • . n on licensed landscape architect. Plan must incl . - . - .s one tree in the front yard of each lot and meet Public Works standards k ' . 0.030 G). Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". / ✓ (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENS -T ., : AS PLAN: 16 (a) Plan showing the location of all sensitive .a •- - : - .g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15 %, coal mine areas and important geological . . archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of strea l• .. nk, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 101 -r. flood). Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". (b) Location of all '- . wired sensitive area buffers, setbacks, tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all • a. 'ficant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating . , _ e to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal • any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. • Show proposed lot and tract lines. CIVIL PLANS: / V 17. (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 198$ and horizontal, C. _ o_ ®': a 1. Conversion calculatio to NGVD 1929, din a flood O . , . e • . -prone area 'See www.c i.tukwila.w :. . ub i, ;ks/ • u -tins .flo • dcon ol. • df for further information .!✓otiJ .",e rrr r7au P:\Planning Forms kpplications\ShortPlat- 6- 06.doc, December 4, 2006 We Check items s ubmitted with application Information Requil • May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of Public Works and/or Planning 7 (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals (minimum 20 ft. bey t property li ne). V (d) Total expected cut and fill for plat buildout. (e) Existing and proposed utility improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to www.ci. tukwila. wa. us /pubwks /pwpermit.htm #techinfo. (0450 sgn drant and all proposed hydrants.. M ( Show-tire-TOO yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (i) Plan, profile and cross - section for any right -of -way improvements. Y (j) Show access to lots, driveways, parking areas, fire access lanes and turn - arounds. (k) Show the location and distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures, indicating those to be removed. Show the expected location of all new buildings. it (I) Show proposed lot, tract and easement lines. .r /ee 44> c /22 P1Planning Forms Wpplications\ShortPlat- 6.06.doc, December 4, 2006 RELORDING DOCUMENTS The recording documents submitted for final approval must be in record of survey format, meet all of the King County recording requirements and have original signatures in the applicable signature and notary blanks. The standard signature blanks are included in the AutoCAD template available from the City. KING COUNTY RECORDER'S FORMAT REQUIREMENTS Document Standardization • The first page of all documents must have: > The following key information: ♦ Return address ♦ Document title and titles ♦ Reference numbers of documents assigned or released (if applicable) • Names of the grantors and grantees with reference to pages where additional names can be found • Abbreviated legal description • Assessor's property tax parcel number or account number • No attachments are allowed on the pages. • The font size must be at least 8 point. • The paper must be of a weight and color capable of producing legible images. • The ink must be a color that is capable of being imaged. • The pages must not be folded. • No marks may appear in the margins. Record of survey format is 18" x 24" with a 2" margin on the left and '/2" on all other sides. • All seals must be legible and capable of being imaged (pressure seals must be smudged). • For additional information go to www.metrokc.gov /recelec /records /recordersForms.htm P:Wianning Ferny Applications \ShortPlat- 6- 06.doc, December 4, 2006 yr Endangered Date: 2 - G 'G 7 uty 0 7 1 1 4" Lz / bcreemng Lneciuist A E 4' 5/e ,P / ' 7 City of Tukwila ( /4o // /'� `'�n�'� Q1)' S Species Act Screening Checklist �v�I��� �_E 1 . . . . .. 0 2i;;')/ D E VEI "° sir Applicant Name: ,---;&"; 4<" ' Al k . "9s7s /D 13.t?a.tE'? 5 // , 8? S7 , X ZG o w.1 71 c>o..4 Street Address: City, State, Zip: Telephone: ('2 ) 7 79 — - 7 8 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. ECE VED SU 2 0 2007 TUKWI A PUBLIC WORK January 25, 2001 ii 1 - 0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 ontinue to Questi. Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 YES Continue to Questio do . age 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the.o Binary high water ,i mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands ?rdinary high' water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so cominori and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Pale 18 -15). Please circle a I ! opriate response. O Continue to Questio 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle .: 1 • ' date response. NO - ' ontinue to Questi i n 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. N Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 • Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SEPAAPP.doc April 4, 2006 Part A (continued) City of Tap ESA Screening Checklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the ishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water s covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Questio YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate rspgnse. Continue to Question YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 - Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. N9 Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) ontinue to Questi 2 - 1 Will'the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a w e course or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Questio 3 -0 : age 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 - 2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 - 4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 - 5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) • Part B (continued Ltty of Tukwila tSli Screentng LnecKttst Will ur project enerate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater, treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to _seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this q uestion. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please - circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. City of Tel ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not lim tei to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. Llty of 1 urcunta t,)/ ocreemng LnecKUSt SID 3 - Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 - Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created-to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 - Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) NO - Continue to Question 3 - YES - Continue to Question 3 - 4 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: izo 7- c E y 4 — L T Pew - s 2. Name of Applicant: 3. Date checklist prepared: 28 SQL 1 0 - 7 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 2 a o 7 It _1vw S M 2007 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. A /7v,Ga G .1 /?.z'Si pE, 'e E f 2 NE fry- 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. WE 7 L,y/ By � s so cr� 200 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \SEPAAPP.doc April 4, 2006 4 :4 LIZ:0 (I • tkil 4 Dp i /l NT Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. e / `2.-'.4e1% /L. S2-1c.),/e. , 7,5 . 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Zo > / % /p 0�� X �i�/�' L 7 7 /80 5 0/, 7.40e L . i_I_ � 6 �S G '/7 : / ve7//'7.4 >-,F' 70 ?.4 2 .e sJ1)E/` 5 _ 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should,submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. AP S; 7vJll'i / - / 1='jy ; /5 ,moo - 9035 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? 57�.e"P S oaaE �oss,�L PV/..5. 7 /.t,-"4 . S . Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: 44_ z) Y i_r r ,¼? S P2 L t.✓� � / 41, 0 r2 J + 2 'VA tir /'1 42 S7� Y (12 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? m '1O o o J, / `70 63,1 J J//.ES /4 What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. (see Get:feck „.or5 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 5 w ,d o s / ,V p 4-7 4 , v./ 9 d „e,& 7 c Die' J 7 P -rho �G /9, e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. (/A 2 . 7 - re, / Zo c) 6 5 e9 Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ,y,ES g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: vl".,' /A' z - 7;4P '?/ v" S G 7 / ( Ve ° Y - 7 rV$ 7/2 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. l/.P / /t/ %' S 7'.e . v // • LX.� /9 r/ .S 7// aS 7 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. �Z= �o A 92 /Doy2 3. Water Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Zvi,9 � e ,,2>-s 77' rg. s J �F4 U SE / 1 -- s /x/ $ , h- a. Surface: Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the_site,�- — (including.year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, pon If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Will the project require any work over, in, or 'djacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ti Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. A/0 . 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /YO Ground: Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. S . (5a Gi.oTIcs4 plot< b I' Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: Water Runoff (including storm water): Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. /f/L, '5) 6e) 7a /,4Av 4 / e e ( b ,r /s', 3 ` 7.�':/ve.,df � QEPogfs) '� /60 rz.v) 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. M /Z.4' e2,z S l,SE 6 S L.// Gel/ / / o s o' 7.v/ S Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, , ound, and runoff water impacts, if any: , `...--- Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ‹..ZPvergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other `"---- S s s Pasture Cro r grain et soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, / j5 :7 1,-, skunk cabbage, other L c:5 � Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation Applicant Responses: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 4. Plants a. Checksr circle types of vegetation found on the site: ) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? "1/ ,# - 77e A 3/7 vs, / J ,_..5 .+ c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: iv y , LIs r,//« ( /V w s Q/ 7 / ov1J Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are b. known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish /�//� Other Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: aw , heron,, songbirds Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shell isle, ~ other List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. // ( Is the site part of a migration route? If so, expl in. //yam< // /`! - ``i `On; a(ia `tt gekir 41e. Pac.rsic i / /4 an y . cows coy 'o.( t ♦e 44 Sife4aes d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife if any: 5 7 7 o s , 7 4 7 ' / ' - / 72) b " ) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds- of energy electric atural gas, meet the completed project's energy needs'. Describe w heating, etc. / 5 Agency Comments ? ( /4' ,e0" 6 ,r/ ._ /,/0 7 other: /,�17 //L��J (.�� 7'L/ /S -7 ' /rJ olar) will be used to er it will be used for Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: //1--5"1/2/' 7/ (9•/ - U/' 9v.9 ( 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. O , 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. / C__ / G /C 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A/o 1P,.P D Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? - �= S`, , s - 75 //S /IV 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. `5.o M� .�� v /! 7 - Ho /S .5 70/ v c 7' i o.� 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: /'Ie 2/' /t 'S >/? /C 7'O i')p}' Z/l /,/7 r a/ S - 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? A / /JFiy 7 //� b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ID Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. Z y ,5 s - /r (3) Z ye2s C // 94c /2�_3,0/e d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? //c e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 5' 7 7a, .S2 4,7 P,4 ° possios ,4 _S e s . As a - ..I,;i (4 Cfr. s, Z, sJ ow, 3 (.t. Sets Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people woul 65' --- / Z work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 7 o L b a` 9. Housing a. A oximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middl low- income housing? / /Vo Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle; or low - income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: /V�, 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? v — 3s--- / b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 5 /Vo c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? /% vsF. + 4 4 "9, , '/ A/' s b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? /V© c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? v d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? / Pe, o >`' / G /3 / © ? X. ��J v c, L. (A/.Es 7- I Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /vo If9JA/7 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. /4 6/E. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: /y /X Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment; 14. Transportation a. Identi public streets . • d highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • S — O / / c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? //7-5 E_ ( ? L , �s • J b- Du7S /Z E2 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). /V0 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 7�iG°..s / z 5 ,009 Y g. 15. Public Services Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: a. Would the project result in an in - . - „ eed . `. T : : ervices (for example: protection, ce rotectj', ealth car , hools . ther)? If so, generally describe. / ,yo /�v�f��J 5 ��iD ,,,tF Ala�F o 7�//?c� 4- 4 /-/ 7'77)c s_ b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: fuse serve e, other: I PR /u - rte , �n tary sewer s Applicant Responses: C. SIGNATURE Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. .?",4 c/,� /V /Ava The above answers are true and complete to the best of my jwledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: " /?Z Date Submitted: ` r�C (C) - Agency Comment (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). a I690AMt =am a 1, LANOYMY Marna a ]ill• taw( MT04071I1D1 MO MNa ay CUT aJaa IO�IRtl TMYL 'AYrt p.OaIOMi OM 1mFJ ea. MmOA4[ LOAM VaatinS (COTOIO DAMWAT M ae.n, Ra ON Ina 0a I® MK LOAM vAgmAT faunal onvwna an D,aANloart ON 471!) EARTHWORK ESTIMATES CUT 1100 CY FILL 1.500 CY (NCI TRENCH GRAVEL) ACTTVDY SCHEDULE 1. STAKTN BY SURVEYOR. Z S PLACE SST FENCE AS SHOWN 3. PERFORM ROUGH GRADING OF NEW DRNEWAY AREA 4. RSTALL NEW CATCH BASINS AND ORAINAOE PWERRENCN. INSTALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTTLMES AT THIS TOME. INSTALL SILT TRAP IN NEW CATCH BASINS. 5. PERFORM FOE GRADING OF NEW AND DRIVEWAY AREA 0. PAVE NEW ROAD AND DRIVEWAY AREAS. T. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS WITH GRASS SEED. 0. REMOVE SILT FENCING AND CATCH BASIN SILT TRAPS ONCE VEGETATION IS R GRAPHIC SCALE //�� WC7NlTY / MA e a ! R a i o f Z :I JO 2 5 1 I 1 1 r I a 1 •■•■••••• sootowee. 4.14. I SIM Ill1L1NVId - CV 011 ' •.••■••••••• IAN .114111114 sel.t.sasmoularusra lontarrr.ua ,r1-3.sner — - IV — OS SW 77/Y0,./ 7/3 05.0 11•1•■••••••••••••■■•••••■• 17,••■••■•••••••■■••■■■tli■•■••• .=1...■..■•••■•••••••■==.77 ■■■•■••■•••••••■•■■••711...17. 7 ••••■11..E.T.•■•■•••/ I •••••■••■•■••• ZIr /J•1,00.0••••••••••••14...••••••.ts • ...4••■• ••••••••••■••••■•••••■•••••••■•••••■••••••••• •••••••• •-•• ••••••■••••••• •••••••• •■•••■••••.m.... 11=0.10.11. ...111•M•1 bilsOnnivried •••••■••••■•••■••■• ••••••••••■n••■••= mg ••••■•..”1 r,••••■• • .....o••••••••••••■•••0 .11.10112.1•1•1•••■••E••••11141.•■r., frralaltaf Clupoj 'pod I maromel.smaavona RHIN JO MA • 1.1/i ON LOW cl....1 1/■••••••■•••■•■•.../..../...P....•••■•••••••••■•• ••• • ••••■ 1••• •■••■■■••••Omorm....•,..nra•••■•..*ra Is.........1•1.,..1•06..rw•R*0...”17...13 I bawawaSq....."••••• •■•••••,1"...,.. •••••••••••• =MT.. •.• Am. =•••••%■••••••"•.•••••••••••• •••n•••• swam. na....sramooreratsmoaeccranyx.s Lomas 0 0 as, ••115 1•11 - CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOT 1 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 254.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 111.27 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH: THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'04'36" WEST 111.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08'30'34" WEST 80.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. LOT 2 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36' EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 239.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'04'39" WEST 253.07 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SAID WEST 408.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'30'54" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 79.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. AND TOGETHER WITH UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. LOT 3 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 79.87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 260.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0211'12" WEST 121.44 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 280 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 87'48'46" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 258.43 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 98.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. _ • AND TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO A UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of 20 at M in book • of._ at page at the request of l2 r647411 c/Z • ve'» LAND SU YOR'S CERTIFIC'ATE I, (TCHa - L A "oa , register . ) as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that this plot is based on on actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles ore shown thereon correctly, and that monument other than PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONT.) LOT 4 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 79.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 260.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 103.73 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 132.99 FEET TO THE THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 280 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 87'48'48" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 128.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0211'12" EAST 121.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT IF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. • AND TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO A UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDING NO. EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AND UTILITIES RECORDING NO. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH);; THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47" EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 79.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 195.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 168.99 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 20.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'04'36" WEST 79.14 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 29.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'11'12" WEST 46.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'04'36" WEST 20.08 FEET' THENCE NORTH 0211'12" EAST 43.39 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, AN ARC OF 33.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'04'36" WEST 33.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0211'12" EAST 20.08 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. NEW 10 FOOT UTILITY( EASEMENT RECORDING NO. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 87'48'48" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 370.58 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'48" WEST 375.00 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SAID SECTION AND AND THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2 (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 10'44'47 EAST 106.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 15.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 01'30'54" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 79.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'39" EAST 195.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0211'12" WEST 20.08 FEET TO. THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87'04'36" EAST 172.73 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 08'30'34" EAST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 10.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'04'36' WEST 174.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0211'12" EAST 10.04 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY FOR: Jeff Foiey and Sharon Mann 120 S.W. 194th St. Normandy Park, Wa PORTION OF SE 1 /4 of SE ____1/4, S. _1 5 _ T 2 3 N., R. 4 _E., W.M. SCHROETEROLAND SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 813, Seahurst, Washington 98062 (206) 242 -6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 DWN. BY LAW DATE 12/6/06 DATE FIELD 6/15/06 JOB NO. 490/18 PROJECT NO. 06143 VI I I V1 I VI% PI I L..r KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. DECLARATION Know oll men by these presents that we, the undersigned, owner(s) in fee simple of the land herein described do hereby make a SHORT PLAT. The undersigned further declore this SHORT PLAT to be o graphic representation of said SHORT PLAT of said and some is mode with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s). IN WITNESS WHEREOF we set our hands and seals. Name Name Nome Nome Nome Nome State of Washington County of On this doy personally appeared be fore me _ to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the he /she signed the some as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand o seal this day of Signature Nome as commissioned Title My appointment expires State of Washington County of On this doy personally appeared be fore me _ to me known to be. the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the he /she signed the some as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. GIVEN under my hand c sea' this dcy of Signature Nome as commissionec Title My appointment expires RECORDER'S CERTiPiCA TE filed for recoro this Coy of 20 a M in book of at page ct the request o` APPROVALS: Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this __day of Chairman, Short Subdivision Committee EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., LYING WEST OF MACADAM ROAD SOUTH; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; T THENCE NORTH 40'20'25" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE IF 24.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE, A ARC DISTANCE OF 24.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8517'33" WEST 180.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, WHICH IS NORTH 87'48'32" WEST 375 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 10'44'32" EST 106 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51" EAST 197.60 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 08'55'10" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 08'55'10" WEST 81.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 15, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SAID SECTION 15, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD NO. 2; THENCE NORTH 40 %5D20'25" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 72.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'46'25" WEST 110.72 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 93.52 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08'55'10" EAST 81.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87'04'51" EAST 169.0 FEET TO APPOINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD, SOUTHERLY 72 FEET FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE 72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTH 280 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'42" EAST 378.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10'44'32" EAST 125 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'56'42" WEST T A POINT 125 FEET SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 125 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF THE NORTH 205 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE WEST 408.7 FEET OF SAID SECTION. LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE . rc L Sep °°° , registered as o fond surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that this plot is based on an actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles ore shown thereon correctly, and that monuments other than those monuments nnnrnvarl fnr asaina nt n Inf ar .Info Exomined and approved this __ doy of 'Assessor Deputy Assessor Account Number 1523049035 SURVEY FOR: Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 120 S.W. 194th St. Normandy Park, Wo 20 PORTION OF SE 1 /4 of _SE _1 /4, S._ 15_ T._ N., R._4_E., W.M. C T g r a • !MAP • .?Darn 10005 exoe ,.w.a.. wow warrm I DWN. BY LAW SITE RECEIVED DAN 1 7 2007 COMmur1' . •, bEVELOPt.11:'14T !SCHROETER LAN D SURVEYING ROFESSION.AL LAND SURVEYORS I a C. Box 813. Seahurst, uoshington 98062 (206) 242 -6621 FAX (206)243 -9679 CATE 12/6/06 I JOB NO. 490/18 DATE FIELD 6/15/06 I PROJECT NO. 06143 CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHORT PLAT FILE NO. Northwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 15, T23N, R4E, W.M. (Point of Beginning New Legal Descriptions) /- 239.11' Lot 2 Area = 19,595 s.f. +/- S87'04' 36 "W 253.07' z o 00 LA 5.1' 260.62' Lot Area = W /EASEMENT = 28,454 s.f. +/- Area = W/O EASEMENT = 26,391 s.f. +/- 70.01' 1 7 —New 20' access and Barn to be removed 21.99' 111.27 O S87'04'36 "W 111.27' 61.5' Lot 1 Arec = 8,860 s.f. +/- 36.3' 0 0 103.73' - i utilities easement - -- New 10' utility easement Lot 4 ni ! Area = W /EASEMENT = 14,637 s.f. +/- J Areo = W/0 EASEMENT = 11,803 s.f. +/- 3 N N O N Found rebor w /cap #17659 morked "line point" (Ref. ROS 109/11) 10 O 58.31' J Found rebor w /cap #17659 0.20' south & 0.13' eost of talc. position. N87'04'36 "E (Ref. 109/11) N87'04'51 "E (DEED) 366.08' (Ref. ROS 109/1 Found rebor w /cop #1765 0.07' south & 0.03' east of talc. position. 9.0' m 370.57' (Deed) Access and Utilities Easement = 4,897 s.f. + North line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Sec. 15, T23N, R4E, W.M. NOTE: THIS SURVEY IS A RETRACEMENT OF RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9605029001, VOL. 109/11. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of 20 at M in book of of page at the request of A efe- La- d O to N 87'04' 36 "E 195.36' 15.70 N87'04'36 "E Ref. ROS 109/1 Lot 2 N O 0 33.35' Z S87'04'36 "W LotI 'co O z 0) r7 20 08 587'0 Found rebor w/cop #15023 0.05' south & 0.15' east of colt. position. LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE RrcL,o -c( L- Sc{..O' 4-5" , registered as a land surveyor by the Stote of Washington, certify that this plot is bosed on on octuol survey of the lond described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; thnt th diet nnree rnurcec nnri .... .del , ...e 4,6,...... N87'04'36 "E Lot 1 168.99' 79.14' S87'04'36 "W Lot 4 NEW ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT Scale: 1" = 30' N87'48'48 "W 375.00' Deed - Held 360.57' (Ref. ROS 109/11) 258.43 SURVEY FOR: Jeff Foley and Shoron Monn 120 S.W. 194th St. Normandy Park. Wa 386.43' (Ref. ROS 109/11) 587'48'48 "E (Ref. ROS 109/11) RECORDING NO. SCALE: PORTION OF _ 1 /4 of _ ___1/4, S. 5 T. 23 N., R. 4 _ E. , W.M. Point of Beginning (Originol Deed) 1 inch = 30 It 128.00' ( Note: Existing fire hydrant 190' + / -1 south of Southeast corner full parcel) 111111 - 41 — .01' i N VOL. /PAGE 23 0 U, 30' r Found pk nail (Ref. ROS 109/11) U, 1 0 o I tP O RECE \VE JAN1� cow Nrof DEy� 1 60' w d J SOH ROETEROLAND SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 813, Seahunst, Washington 98062 (206) 242 -6621 VAX (206)243 -9679 n,.,a o ar T n. x . n is one i ,l,e •,r, dOn /10 SOIL LOGS FOLEY/MANN SHORT PLAT 28 JUL 06 SLj 0-96" 96 -120 "+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL2 0-84" 84 -96 "+ SL 3 0-24" 24 -72 "+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 0 "+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL) 0 -96 "+ MED DARK LOAM W /COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SL 0-48 "+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES (EXISTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) 'SECr/ew /n ¢. Z % /D' /D' Z % 2 h." CL 'P'A.G. 4" A 4 2 . T. G. u M /44 6RA2)ED BA EM TL� 4 ; v r Founo rebor winos, #17659 0.20' south It 0. east of cols. ; position. I e - -cuss rebor wjco) f 05' south A 0.:5' soot c' soft. position ;87'04 "M: y ] • :. ,s• 1:•.- - e' it ci4tred porch ono fon . t `3 L 4 -0 , 1 4 145c v Fauna rebor w/cop 11765S • 0.07' south & 0.03' eosf — of cc position. me "• :.1 I'ho • end 7 • :...r= :30.7' t z= � t 4—south enc.: 12`cp . too = CL ditch 31 /"= 30' STOP"/ OE 74'777N SY STEM NEW /Z" C'dL f/E.eT NEW TYPE ,-north en „ 1' -23 PO WE.e S CA TEL ,, GAS /NL: MMDN T.PENCA S7UBS / too • 2' cam`" rim = t12 \ water •.30. ._..r_. -'32 Future Impervious Surface: Existing House 1,600 SF Existing Driveway 800 SF (remaining portion) 3 New Houses 6,000 SF 3 New Driveways 1,200 SF Private Road 4,800 SF Total 13,400 SF Previous Inipcniiiou Surf up Existing House 1,600 SF Existing Barn 1,200 SF Existing Total Driveway 4.500 SF 8,300 SF Net New Impervious Surface: 5,100 SF Cm ,2oo CY Fill 1,200 CY (waste on sue) /� VICIN /TY /N\ MAP / "` 14 • 13837 MH F14 - 25 14313 4716 14328 I ul S. 140th S LOT 22 LOT 20 4414 14120 4430 4242 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL I f I 4611 l 4515 4529 I f 1111 I F13 4617 4628 MIDDLE SCHOOL H F14 -13 gel MH F15 -3Fk 14100 I 14303 4710 • 14239 13 NH F14 - 24 14233 14245 14251 14257 4261 4- OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS DEPOSIT $ /( OWNER 14!____. / .' ___1 CONTRACTOR / r HOUSE ADDRESS PG // ls, dirl BASEMENT: YES NO NAME SUB - DIVISION ( LOT No. BLK. No. SCALE SCANNED TEST RESULTS ©,/x.177 /77 �7 • MITitze APPLICATION FOR - CARD No. SIDE SEWER PERMIT DATE �L 15L 30c7 qo 2 32 PO RGH 465' S' 4v .48s 45 S '0. " r P✓c p /YMCA 0110 i2D. 5. • PERMIT 4 2 7 9 EASEMENT No. RECEIVED 1 JAN 1'7 2Qfl7 COMMUNI DEVELOPMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE CONNECTION HAS BEEN MADE AS SHOWN, PRIOR TO BACKFILL DISTRICT APPROVAL BY �! /�-- DATE a" <30--- 94_ B DATE 14002 46.0 7.0 1+25 4300 23.0 9.5 1+01 4710 7.0 2.0 0 +88.4 14008 47.0 8.0 1+73 4306 30.0 10.0 0 +30 4714 5.0 3.0 0 +85.5 14014 49.0 5.0 2 +43 4318 3.1.0 1+28.3 4716 5.0 3.5 1+83.9 14020 27.0 5.5 2 +65 4321 31.0 1+00.8 4718 5.0 7.0 1+12.7 14100 51.0 6.5 3 +54 4324 25.0 0 +48 4814 5.0 10.5 0 +75.7 14110 59.0 6.0 0 +14 4325 23.0 7.0 0 +61 • 43RD AVENUE SOUTH 4407 21.0 7.0 1 +73 14002 31.0 6.6 0 +56 4529 38.5 3.5 0 +19 14005 27.0 6.0 0 +26 4611 10.0 4.0 0 +02.5 14008 30.0 10.0 0 +90 4617 6.0 5.0 1+50 14014 31.0 5.5 1+60 4627 50.0 5.0 1+50 14015 30.0 5.5 0 +28 14120 40.0 1 +11 14020 31.0 5.0 0 +60 14120 25.0 6.0 1+85 14021 31.0 6.0 0 +70 4515 15.5 5.0 1+21 14025 30.0 6.0 1 +27 SOUTH 144TH STREET 14026 30.0 6.0 1 +16 4704 29.0 6.5 2 +73.4 14032 30.0 5.0 2 +12 4712 34.0 8.5 1 +96 14109 25.0 6.5 2 +99 4804 32.0 6.7 1 +13 14115 26.0 7.0 3 +86 4814 33.0 6.0 0 +16 14116 30.0 6.6 3 +58 MACADAM ROAD LOT 4 31.0 7.6 2 +40 14003 21.0 3.0 0 +10.3 LOT 4 30.0 6.6 2 +95 14006 27.5 4.0 0 +19.3 14122 31.0 9.0 MH 14011 21.0 4.0 0 +82.5 �--- 14011 14031 30.0 30.0 6.0 1 +15 1+72 14011 14038 25.5 5.0 1 +66.5 46.5 5.0 3 +05.5 ,.-.. 4506 26.0 5.0 2 +38 14233 15.0 2.0 1+61.2 44TH AVENUE SOUTH 14239 21.0 6.0 3 +05.5 14004 10.0 2 +50 14239 21.0 2.5 0 +93.5 • 14015 21.0 4.5 1+83 14245 17.5 2.5 2 +71.5 . XI 14025 21.0 8.5 2 +50 14251 19.5 3.0 3 +10 r Z 171 14027 21.0 7.0 2 +73 14257 39.0 4.0 1+42 ao � n 3 C ) c 14105 21.0 9.5 0 +40 14261 38.0 3.0 1 +53.2 0 �o .' R1 14111 21.0 7.0 0 +94 14100 20.5 1.0 3 +10.5 Z 14 20.0 7.0 1+32 14100 30.0 5.0 1+51 4 � o m 14121 19.0 7.5 1+80 LOT 10 21.0 5.0 1+91 --.../ 14125 17.0 5.5 2 +35 LOT 11 21.0 4.0 0 +60 LOT 12 47.0 4.0 0 +48.6 STUB LOCATIONS MAP PAGE F -14 ADDRESS LENGTH DEPTH STATION ADDRESS LENGTH DEPTH STATION ADDRESS LENGTH DEPTH STATIOI 42ND AVE SOUTH EASEMENT s 4 03 •-1-• a I • • -3 - •• r- e• I 1 t X I I I I • 11 I I o't • .• ■../ I 't. 363' DEED AF N 791157 366.60' DEED AFO 7712080 366.08' COMPUTED. 148.7' N 87'04' 38"E SET POINT ON UNE REBAR 360.57' DEEDO 7712080123 FOUND LEANING 1/2" IRON PIPE 0.8'S \ .r/IX LOT 3 5 SITE SOUTH UNl: ')f" THE NORTH :80' 5) UNE REBAR 84.8' L._ SET POINT ON - I - A / I I I ON / • X I I V1 / I t I • •-• I • d L. FENCE 0.4' NORTH FOUND SINGLE POST 2.3' SOUTH c't * tt • H0G—W1RE FENCE 58.4 tA -- 4tof -- s,,i`�� wsesa ' a o.. 4 0 •® ��e $,c ie1.a?' -111: VAIN 11 Found rebar w / -.. 81 .23 0.05' south & 0.15' east of cote. position. SOIL LOGS FOLEY/14ANN SHORT PLAT 22 JUL 06 SL a 0-96' 96 -120+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES SLa 044' MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES 64 -96'+ SANDY CLAY (MOTTLED) SL 0.24• Mm DARK LOAM NV/COBBLES 24 -77+ SANDY CLAY ( MOTTED) 51.4 0-72•+ MID DARK LOAM WICOBBLES (DUSTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SHE) SL f 0-96'+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBBL.ES (170STING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) SI. 045'+ MED DARK LOAM W/COBBLES (DUSTING DRIVEWAY CUT EMBANKMENT ON SITE) 7% JPDAt2 i 76W 4', , , 4 - ROAD /Q' /0' z i 2r4• CZ'S C .,P.T.c. ".WIN. " BApAB.ED ' 2D' W ACCESS AND '7 /L /T /ts .e44 S '/,' Found rebar w /cap marked I point on deed line EARTHWORK ESTIMATES CUT 1,200 CY FILL 1,500 CY (INCL TRENCH GRAVEL) /O 722 /6" WIDE 07 /1.17JES EASEMENT KLSERLE0 WAZE2 AE7E2 AALFA 3' XJSy ZO'.2 C7YP..) //.SS CB - 7VPE Z Cfd .P /./er m 43'4 . / JE G ' • /30.1. (NEST) and 12' /E G - /3 /. / (NO27N, -1 .0. EAST). cP W/ TEE WESTUNE - 131.4' - 132.4' - 128.0' S /LT FENC 1 ¢6-tF /Z• o.z.CCYSZ E//L t/ZZ7 I.NA7EN EX 2/7EN cb flows S->N rim -133.7 Inv(12 130.6' im(1Ycp(N)=130.7 cb rim - 134.5' Inu(12'ADS(N) 132.4' Inv(t 2'ADS(S)- 132.5' /NF /L.T.2474N TRE.VEN ' D X AS:3' W X Ate t end 16 top - 127.2' C " OVE �O ,70 O / TCN cote L•QNS7.e E//724NCL? ACTIVITY SCHEDULE: 1. STAKING BY SURVEYOR. 2. PLACE SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. 3. PERFORM ROUGH GRADING OF NEW DRIVEWAY AREA. 4. INSTALL NEW CATCH BASINS AND DRAINAGE PIPE/TRENCH. INSTALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AT THIS TIME INSTALL SILT TRAP IN NEW CATCH BASINS. 5, PERFORM FINE GRADING OF NEW AND DRIVEWAY AREA. 6. PAVE NEW ROAD AND DRIVEWAY AREAS. 7. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS WITH GRASS SEED. 8. REMOVE SILT FENCING AND CATCH BASIN SILT TRAPS ONCE VEGETATION IS REESTABLISHED. RECEIVED dUr, 0 1 2001 onooI (Dr Pg@) 1 inch -20 rt. VICINITY MA / -a 4/4 BILE F z Lu cI A 111 kn m 6 3' Si et D 0 o a f Z # s kartfr ound rebar w /cap 817659 0.20' south & 0.13' east of cafe.. position. mL S87'04'39' 386. ROCKERY PER "SFA PLAN Found rebar w /cop 817859 0.07' south & 0.03 east of cafe. position. d #75 CB - 7YPE T rfB • i R //N = 144.17 /Elea = /30.G CZ/7571 /CG° o /440 C4 SQ 4/7A3 IN / 7EE EAST NE orth end 12 t�p - 130.7 ,3 ,A south end 12'ep top - 131.4' 6ENEP4 UTjL/T /ES /N E0AN4AN TLENCN- WA7E2 SELV /CEs. 0422 - CL ditch 7 Z., !A7t,/ •i a"AS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN N g 6 I r g I I s 1 3 I I I S Y 01-0 d X. /43. F /N. /d`7. 5" Z 1 0 0 n / Fx, 1 . F /N. /S`a. , . Ex. /sue a /4L. E 2 ' . ,/ 0.3 ,, v. /13. 5 F /N. /SS.O L —12 / w :r0;'4.. s X., /31.4 Mini. , %h ?.. sao / Are V f I r I I 9 1 I I S� a 9 t I I Ii F t� Vt O B 9 I I JOB NOS OG /S $jte Improvement Plan CLIENTI Jeff Foley and Sharon Mora RE MAX Eastaide Brokers, Inc. 11555 S.E. 8th Street, #200 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 779 - 3781 $ S. MacVeigh, P.E. Civil Engineer g g DESIGN I 8S• Jeff Foley and Sharon Mann 4-Lot Short Plat 14245 59th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 Office: (206) 242 -7665 FAX: Same - call lint - DRAWN I BS/7 14011 Macadam Road S. Tukwila, WA 98168 P14: 152304 - 9035 API DS DATE /./YDV 274 / " ' 3 4' REV DESCRIPTION DATE APF'D SCALES IN N g 6 I r g I I s 1 3 I I I S Y 01-0 d X. /43. F /N. /d`7. 5" Z 1 0 0 n / Fx, 1 . F /N. /S`a. , . Ex. /sue a /4L. E 2 ' . ,/ 0.3 ,, v. /13. 5 F /N. /SS.O L —12 / w :r0;'4.. s X., /31.4 Mini. , %h ?.. sao / Are V f I r I I 9 1 I I S� a 9 t I I Ii F t� Vt O B 9 I I WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT PROPOSED MITIGATION WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT: 581 S.F. CO 1:5 BUFFER 2749 S.F. (0.06 AC) ENHANCEMENT TOTAL WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT = 581 S.F. ADDITIONAL WETLAND A ENHANCEMENT 1347 S.F. (0.03 AC) TOTAL MITIGATION PROVIDED = 4096 S.F. (0.09 AC) L - 1 L - 4 CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATION SUMMARY A PORTION OF THE S.E.1 /4 OF THE N.W.1 /4 OF SECTION 31, T27N, R5E, WM WETLAND A WETLAND MITIGATION AREA WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT 5' SETBACK FROM EX. FOOTINGS TO BASEMENT RETAINING WALL • EDGE OF GRAVEL (TYP) TOE OF EXISTING SLOPE ROCK RETAINING WALL- 1 House 114011 12-2 25' WETLAND BUFFER L -3 1 LEGEND: INDEX: MMGATION SUMMARY SHEET MMGATION REPORT SHEET MMGATION LANDSCAPE PLAN MMGATION DETAILS 0 20 40 80 25' WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT EXISTING WETLAND A EXISTING WETLAND 'A' BOUNDARY EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING ACCESS ROAD BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARCEL BOUNDARY PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED FEATURE PROPOSED ROCK WALL WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY SENSITIVE AREA SIGN (to be placed approximately every 50') SHEET 1 of 4 2 of 4 3 of 4 4 of 4 SCALE: 1"=10' PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION J 0_ 0 W = cc Z C Q C g 1) O cij 6 1 2 1 g Q W J 0 U- OF 4 IA N ZW > < wV O > N ( U) 0< 0 z K REVISIONS: DATE: 2 DESIGN: DRAWN: CHECKED: REVISION NUMBER: SCALE: 1 - .: PROJECT 1 JEFOO( DRAWING I .EFO_0001_ SHEET NO. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MONITORING METHODS MONITORING INTERVAL 1. 100 percent survival of all installed native trees and shrubs one -year post installation. 2. Planted and volunteer tree and shrub species shall achieve: Year 1 - 100% survival; Year 3 - 90% survival; Yeur 5 - 75% survival. 3. At the end of the monitoring period, the following species will comprise <10% of the total vegetative cover in the mitigation areas; Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, Scots broom, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, or any other invasive species as determined by the biologist. 1. Total plant count of installed trees and sin abs shall determine one year warranty and performance standards for years 1 -5. Photographic documentation shall occur from sstablished photopoints to provide additional documentation of plant success in each monitoring year. Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Wetland and buffer vegetation) 4. At least 1 native tree species and 4 native shrub species shall be established in the mitigation area. Years 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Wetland and wetland buffer) 1.0 MITIGATION PLAN OVERVIEW 1.1 UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS TO WETLAND BUFFER Construction of the project will result in unavoidable impact to 581 SF (0.013 AC) of Cotagory IV wetland buffer. The impacted wetland buffer is currently disturbed and degraded.. 1.2 MITIGATION APPROACH WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT Mitigation for impacts to 581 SF of wetland buffer will be accomplished by wetland and wetland buffer enhancement. Enhancement area is based on a 1:1 mitigation ratio established by the City of Tukwila. A total of 2,749 SF (0.06 AC) of enhancement will occur in the wetland buffer to improve the existing degraded nature. This amounts to a 1:5 ratio of wetland buffer enhancement. An additonal 1,347 SF (0.03 AC) of enhar.cement will occur in degraded Wetland A. A total of 4,096 SF (0.13 AC) of enhancement will hi. provided in the mitigation area. The 1:5 ratio is proposed because a buffer reduction from 50' to 25' is alvo proposed with this project. The mitigation areas shall be cleared of all invasive weeds and planted with native trees and shrubs that will provide greater plant diversity and wildlife habitat value. 2.0 MI11CA11ON GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. Replace lost functions from impacts to 581 SF of Category IV wetland buffer by enhancing 2,749 SF of Category IV Wetland A buffer. Enhancement will occur by removing invasive weeds and installing native trees and shrubs. 2. Replace degraded functions from 1,347 SF of degraded Category IV wetland A by enhancing 1,347 SF. Enhancement will occur by removing invasive weeds and installing native trees and shrubs. 3.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Performance standards have been established that correspond to the stated mitigation goals and objectives. These standards are the primary factors that shall be used to judge the success of the mitigation project. It shall be exceedingly important to evaluate the development of the mitigation plan over the entire monitoring period when determining whether each individual standard has been met or not. While specific performance criteria provide imf orient benchmarks and shall help to direct maintenance and contingency efforts, the success of mitigation must be measured against the goals and objectives of the overall mitigation plan. By monitoring the prcjeci and comparing monitoring results to performance standards, a determination can be made for the neea to implement maintenance efforts or the contingency plan. Performance standards are identified in the Wale below. PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4.0 MONITORING PLAN Mitigation monitoring shall be conducted by a Wetland Biologist for five (5) years which includes the installation inspection (one year warranty inspection). The objective of the monitoring program shall be to assess revegetation success. Reports describing monitoring results shall be submitted to the City of Tukwila by December 31 of years 1 through 5. The monitoring results shall be related to the performance standards and if warranted, recommendations shall be made based on these findings. 4.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS Encroachment into sensitive areas shall be monitored during each annual visit. The sensitive areas shall be inspected for clearing, trash dumping and other unauthorized disturbances. Any encroachments in the sensitive areas shall he noted and directed to the City's attention. 4.2 VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT All mitigation plantings shall be monitored for 5 years and shall include a total survival count. Overview photographs shall be token from established photopoints. All planted trees and shrubs shall be evaluated in years 1, 2, o, 4, and 5 to document vegetation development. The monitoring shall be a complete census of plantings. 4.3 MITIGATION MAINTENANCE II necessary. maintenance actions shall be recornrnenaeu oy the monitoring biologist. Maintenance within the mitigation areas shall be performed by the landscape contractor during the one year warranty period. Following the one year warranty period, maintenance shall be performed as necessary to ensure mitigation goals and objectives we met. Implementation of maintenance actions is the responsibility of the project proponent (Jeff Foley). 5.0 MITIGATION SEQUENCING Construction of the mitigation sites shall generally include: 1. A pre- construction meeting; 2. Marking limit of work for mitigation boundaries; 3. Removal of invasive species and installation of plants as specified: 4. Post - construction meeting between all involved parties; 5. Removal of limit of work demarcations; 6. Implementation of monitoring program; 7. On - going maintenance as necessary. 5.1 PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING A pre - construction meeting shall be held on -site between the project engineer, all necessary construction contractors (general and landscape contractors), and Wetland Biologist and or Landscape Architect. During this meeting, site conditions, permit, specifications, and the mitigation plans shall be reviewed. This shall assist all involved parties in understanding the intent, specifications, and requirements of the mitigation plan. 5.2 MARKING OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FOR MITIGATION AREA BOUNDARIES The limit of work boundaries of the mitigation areas shall be marked in the field prior to preliminary site preparation, earthwork, or planting by the contractor. Boundaries shall be marked by installing orange temporary construction fencing to clearly delineate the mitigation area. 5.3 PLANTING PLAN All mitigation plants shall be native species. See plant schedule on Sheet 3 of 4. 5.4 POST - CONSTRUCTION MEETING A post- construction site review of the completed work shall be conducted between the Landscape Architect / Wetland Biologist and the contractor to verify that the plan was properly implemented. This field meeting shall identify any discrepancies between the plan and the field plantings and if necessary, propose corrective measures. If the plan was properly implemented. the monitoring period shalt commence. 6.0 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION The Wetland Biologist or Landscape Architect (construction observer) shall be on -site periodically during the implementation of the mitigation area to review the plant installation. The responsibilities of the construction observer(s) shall include: responding to contractor questions regarding unique construction or planting techniques; review of construction materials and nursery stock, and review of plant locations. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to verify that plan specifications have been met. 7.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN The contingency plan shall provide remediation for the mitigation goals that hove not been met. If the desired mitigation goals, as measured by the monitoring program and performance standards, have not been met and cannot be achieved through routine maintenance, then a determination by the City of Tukwila and the project proponent may be made to require submittal of a contingency plan. After written approval by the City, a contingency plan shall be implemented that compensates for the failed goals of the approved mitigation plan. If the contingency plan is substantial. the City shall extend the monitoring period. 8.0 PERFORMANCE SECURITY Certificate of occupancy shall not be complete until the mitigation plan is installed, inspected, approved and bonded. In order to ensure that the mitigation is properly implemented, including monitoring and contingencies, the project proponent (Jeff Foley) shall provide a Performance Bond following King City procedures. The total cost, plus contingency fees, shall be the amount of the Performance Bond. The Performance Bond shall become effective following installation and approval by the City. A. MITIGATION COST ESTIMATE: BOND ESTIMATE (Includes labor, materials, maintenance and monitoring f or 5 years, 30% contingency and mobilization) TOTAL COST ESTIMATE: B. THE PERFORMANCE BOND (120% OF A) IS ESTIMATED TO BE: $ 12,102.00 $ 14,522.00 Q J � J O Q- 1) W = a- ZQ v o zo r^ Q VJ Q z Z 0) w � J w � E Z u- U W O M IL 7 REVISIONS: APPD. DATE: 2 -18 -08 DESIGN: TRS DRAWN: IRS CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 DRAWING FILE: JEFO_0001_M2 SHEET N0. of 4 2 DF - \ \% \ \� \� °� Pseud TREES menziesi vi�. rt - Tsuga heterophylla A PORTION OF THE S.E.1 /4 OF THE N.W.1 /4 OF SECTION 31, T27N, R5E, WM PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME SHRUBS /GROUNDCOVERS Acer circinotum Comus sericea Halodiscus discolor Lonicera involucrata Symphoricarpos albus Rosa nutkano Mahonia aquifolium Salle scouleriana Salle lasiandra BUFFER HYDROSEED MIX COIOION NAPE Douglas Fir Western Hemlock Vine Maple Red Osier Dogwood Ocean Spray Black Twinberry Snowberry Nootka Rose Tall Oregon Grape Scowler Willow Pacific Willow NOTE: Each willow symbol is equal to 16 live stakes. KIND/VARIETY BARCLAY PERENNIAL RYEGRASS RED CREEPING FESCUE HARD FESCUE R BY WEIGHT 70% 207E 107E MIN. R GERM 90% 90% 90% APPUCATION RATE 120 LBS /ACRE CANFOR WOOD CELLULOSE ECO —F1BER MULCH: 2 000 LBS /ACRE NUTRICULTURE SEED STARTER FERTIUZER (16- 45 -7):— 200 LBS /ACRE CANFOR ECO —TAC GUAR TACKIF1ER: 60 LBS /ACRE STAY MOIST MOISTURE RETENTION AGENT 60 LBS /ACRE SUE HT,BB,GAL SPACING QUANTITY HT, 3' -4', BB 15' -2D' O.C. 3 HT. 3' -4', BB 15' -20' O.C. 2 HT, 4' -6', 5 GAL HT 15' -24', 2 GAL HT 15 -24', 2 GAL HT 15' -24', 2 GAL HT 15 2 GAL. HT 15 -24', 2 GAL HT 15' -24'. 2 GAL. UVE STAKES UVE STAKES 10' O.C. 6 8' O.C. 9 8' O.C. 6 6' O.C. 7 3' O.C. 18 3' O.C. 18 3' O.C. 26 24' O.C. 48 24" O.C. 64 LEI:END: 25' WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING WETLAND A EXISTING WETLAND 'A' BOUNDARY EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING ACCESS ROAD BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARCEL BOUNDARY PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED FEATURE PROPOSED ROCK WALL WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY PLANTING NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED OF INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES. WETLAND AREA SHALL BE GRUBBED BY HAND. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN NURSERY LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION (ANLA) STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z 60.1 -2004) FOR GRADE AND SIZE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN. 3. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF PLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SOURCES OR SUBSTITUTIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSPECTED AT THE NURSERY, OR PROJECT SITE. BY THE OWNER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. FAILURE TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS OF MATERIALS AND OF INSTALLATION METHODS AFTER TWO INSPECTIONS SHALL SUBJECT THE CONTRACTOR TO INSPECTION FEES, PAID TIME AND MATERIALS AT THE STANDARD RATE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6. IN THE EVENT OF VARIATION BETWEEN THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN THE PLANS, THE PLANS SHALL CONTROL. 7. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND AS SHOWN IN THE THE PLANTING DETAILS. 8. WETLAND BUFFER PLANTING PITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH CEDAR GROVE 2 -WAY TOPSOIL MIX (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). WETLAND PLANTING PITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH CEDAR GROVE COMPOST (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). BACKFILL PLANT PITS WITH 3 PARTS EXISTING NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL TO 1 PART SPECIFIED AMENDMENT. REMOVE EXCESS EXISTING SOIL FROM SITE. 9. ALL PLANT PITS SHALL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS: 3" DEEP X APPROXIMATELY TWICE THE ROOTBALL DIAMETER. BUFFER PLANTING PITS SHALL BE BARK MULCH AND WETLAND PLANTING PITS SHALL BE COMPOST MULCH. 10. BUFFER PLANTING AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITH SPECIFIED HYDROSEED MIX. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY TIME RELEASE FERTILIZER TO PLANT PITS (OSMOCOTE TM OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. NO FERTILIZER SHALL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE OWNER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE PLANTING INSTALLATION TO INSPECT THE METHOD AND LAYOUT OF PLANTING USED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 13. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPE MAIN1ENANCE OF THE PLANTING AREAS DURING THE INSTALLATION, AND WARRANTY PERIOD. 14. THE LANDSCAPE DNTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMA "SHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 15. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR THOROUGHLY WHEN PLANTED AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST ONE INCH OF WATER PER WEEK DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON (MARCH 15 TO OCTOBER 15) FOLLOWING MITIGATION INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR WILL WATER THE ENTIRE SITE WEEKLY, EXCLUDING SIGNIFICANT RAINY PERIODS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS DURING INSTALLATION AND THE WARRANTY PERIOD. CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO REMAIN ALIVE AND HEALTHY DURING THIS PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL DEAD OR UNHEALTHY PLANTS, PER PLANS AND AS IDENTIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/ BIOLOGIST DURING THE ONE YEAR WARRANTY INSPECTION. 3. ALL MITIGATION PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TWICE DURING THE FIRST YEAR BY WEED REMOVAL (IN EARLY APRIL /MAY AND SEPTEMBER /OCTOBER). ALL HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY. EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY SCOT'S BROOM, JAPANESE KNOTWEED, REED CANARYGRASS, CLIMBING NIGHTSHADE, PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE, MORNING GLORY, VETCH, TANSY RAGWORT AND THISTLE SHALL BE REMOVED WITH ROOT CROWNS GRUBBED OUT. OTHER WEEDS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / WETLAND BIOLOGIST. PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 20 40 80 wrin SCALE: 1 "= 20' Z z O� W e ZQ <cr) g 0 Z Z U)Q E Q W w LL W LL- 0 LL REVISIONS: SHEET NO. DATE: 2 -18 -08 DESIGN: TRS DRAWN: TRS CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: SCALE: 1' =20' 3 OF 4 PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 DRAWING FILE: WRLC6_SBRP_WM3 APPD. DECIDUOUS MULTI —STEM TREE PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING MIN. 2X ROOT BALL NOT TO SCALE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE ROOT CROWN 1" -2" ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE 3" BARK OR COMPOST MULCH (SEE (?r"Iic PLANTING NOTES SHEET 3), HOLD BACK '��: 4" FROM MAIN STEM `' 6" HIGH RIM BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX SEE PLANT SCHEDULE SHEET 3 "`� FINISH GRADE PLANTING SOIL FERTILIZER PER PLANTING NOTES EXISTING SUBGRADE ROOT CROWN 2 " -4" ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE 3" BARK MULCH (SEE PLANTING NOTES SHEET 3), HOLD BACK 2 " -3" FROM MAIN STEM 6" RIM BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX FINISH GRADE REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET FROM ROOT BALL PLANTING SOIL FERTILIZER PER PLANTING NOTES EXISTING SUBGRADE NOT TO SCALE 2X2 HARDWOOD STAKE DRIVEN TO REFUSAL (24" MIN.). SECURE TO TREE WITH PLASTIC LOCK STRIP. TOP OF STAKE TO POINT TO PREVAILING WIND. ROOT CROWN 2 " -4" ABOVE GRADE 3" COMPOST OR BARK MULCH (SEE NOTES SHEET 3), HOLD BACK 2 " -3" INCHES FROM MAIN STEM 6" BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX E PLANT SCHEDULE SHEET 3 FINISH GRADE REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET FROM ROOT BALL PLANTING SOIL FERTILIZER PER PLANTING NOTES EXISTING SUBGRADE Sensitive Area Boundary Protection of this natural wetland area is in your care. Alteration or disturbance is prohibited by law. Reese Cal fne C ■y of Tommie . Deoenment of Commonly Development for more mfo rnAL . ar '.111,1 A •.4.1'.iMI1N l.� LLAI NOUIS 14 FINISHED GRADE USE CUTTINGS 20" MIN. SOIL :TIT END TO A POINT OR EASIER INSTALLATION LIVE STAKE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE III III -1 1 1 � I- 1 -1 I b I L-_l I I -1 -� SENSITIVE AREA SIGN CUT TOP SQUARE FOR EASIER INSTALLATION, PROTECT TOP FROM SPUTTING. INSERT STAKE WITH BUDS POINTING UP TRIM OFF BRANCHES WITH CLEAN CUTS MIN. BURIAL 12" INTO SOIL PRE — PRINTED METAL SIGN CEDAR POST L_ I I L =I 1 I- -11 I CONCRETE FOOTING NOT TO SCALE NOTES: ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH TWO 5/16 GALVANIZED LAG BOLTS WITH WASHERS (TYP). THE SENSITIVE AREA SIGN SHALL BE POSTED AT THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER, SETBACK AREA OR SETBACK TRACT AND THE BUILDING SETBACK AREA. 2. ONE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED PER LOT FOR EVERY 150 FEET OF SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER AND SHALL BE STATIONED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION, i.e.: AT THE CLOSEST POINT TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SIGNS MAY ALSO BE ATTACHED TO FENCES. PERMIT SUBMITTAL- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I— J CL cc 0 = CD C a <C M O G g csj s ZC <L W - 0 LL SCALE: REVISIONS: DATE: 2 - DESIGN: - DRAWN: ... CHECKED: REVISION NUMBER: PROJECT NU JEFOOOC DRAWING F11 JEFO_0001_M- SHEET NO. 4 OF 4 WETLAND IMPACT (FROM DEVELOPMENT) PROPOSED OFF —SITE MITIGATION IMPACT WETLAND 'A' : 1,347 S.F. ® 3:1 enhancement 1,000 S.F. (0.02 AC) 0 1.5:1 creation 1,520 S.F. (0.04 AC) TOTAL WETLAND IMPACT = 1,347 S.F. MITIGATION REQUIRED = 2,520 S.F. (0.06 AC) TOTAL WETLAND MITIGATION PROVIDED = 2,520 S.F. (0.06 AC) 0' 3 O L. w / : 2 0 E 0 0 2 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O tL 2 0 E 0_ fV co 0 N 01 O Y rn #17659 0.20 south & 0.13' east of coic. position. CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATION SUMMARY LEGEND: WETLAND IMPACT INDEX: WETLAND Mf1TGATION SUMMARY SHEET WETLAND MMGATION SPECIFICATIONS WETLAND MITIGATION SPECFICATTONS OFF -SITE MITIGATION GRADING PLAN OFF -SITE Mfi1GA11ON PLANTING PLAN M111GATION PLANTING DETAILS STREAM BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN EXISTING WETLAND 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1"- SHEET 1 of 7 2 of 7 3 of 7 4 of 7 5 of 7 6 of 7 7 of 7 RECEIVED SEP 2 2 2008 COMMIjNTry a 2 J a a. . • 2 � O z Z z � • m • 3 cri 0 Q �m w J 0 LL 7 10(5 OF WARRINGTON REGISTERED LAND :ICAP[ ARCHITECT SCALE:1' =20' SHEET NO. iR & G GAGE Ca!WICA TC M0. 112 DRAWING FILE: JEFO_0001.JJ1 REVISIONS: APPD. DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2 DESIGN: MK DRAWN: GBK CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 WM - 1 OF 7 ACTIVITY SCHEDULE -- .. - - -- - - - - -- SPECIAL NOTES REPLACE ALL FAILED MITIGATION PLANTINGS. ONE LA YEAR FOLLOWING PLANTING. THEN T REQUIRED TO MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. BY CONTRACTOR THE FIRST YEAR; BY OWNER AFTER FIRST YEAR. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION OF NEW PLANTINGS. AT LEAST WEEKLY, MAY 15 THROUGH OCTOBER 31 FOR THE FIRST YEAR FOLLOWING PLANTING. ALL PLANTS MUST RECEIVE ONE INCH OF WATER PER WEEK DURING NE FIRST GROWING SEASON; BY CONTRACTOR THE FIRST YEAR AND BY OWNER AFTER THE FIRST YEAR. TRASH REMOVAL FROM NGPA INSPECT AT LEAST ONCE EACH YEAR FOR YEARS 1, 2. 3. AND 5 OF THE FIVE YEAR MONITORING PERIOD. BY CONTRACTOR THE FIRST YEAR AND OWNER AFTER THE FIRST YEAR. REPAIR/REPLACE NGPA SIGNS AND SPLIT RAIL FENCES. INSPECT AT LEAST ONCE EACH YEAR FOR YEARS 1, 2, 3, AND 5 OF THE FIVE YEAR MONITORING PERIOD. BY CONTRACTOR THE FIRST YEAR AND OWNER AFTER THE FIRST YEAR. WEEDING AT LEAST ONCE EACH YEAR FOR YEARS 1, 2. 3, 4. AND 5 OF NE FIVE YEAR MONITORING PERIOD TREES AND SHRUBS MUST BE WEEDED TO THE DRIPUNE AND MULCH MAINTAINED AT 3 INCHES DEPTH. BY CONTRACTOR THE FIRST YEAR; BY OWNER AFTER THE FIRST YEAR. CLEAR AND GRUB UNDESIRABLE INVASIVE PLANTS FROM NGPA. UNDESIRABLE SPECIES INCLUDE HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY SCOT'S BROOM ENGLISH IVY PURPLE LOOSE STRIFE MORNING GLORY CLIMBING NIGHTSHADE JAPANESE KNOTWEED REED CANARYGRASS AS REQUIRED IN ANNUAL MONITORING REPORTS. REMOVAL SHOULD BE AS DIRECTED BY WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR DURING FIRST YEAR. CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE ACCOMPUSHED BY PHYSICALLY (NON- MECHANICAL) REMOVING PLANT MATERIALS INCLUDING ROOT MASSES) OR HAND TRIMMING BY CONTRACTOR. WEEDS MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE. BY CONTRACTOR THE FIRST YEAR; BY OWNER AFTER THE FIRST YEAR. 3 v 0 w 0 0 E 0 0 N 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n E rn 0 co 0 C, 0 .0 a ri-rcl i — rLJAlv1 IINJIALLAIIVIN cont. MULCH ALL PLANT PITS SHALL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS TO A 3' DEPTH X 18' DIAMETER. MULCH AROUND PLANTINGS SHALL CONSIST OF GROUND RR OR HEMLOCK BARK, HOG FUEL OR APPROVED EQUAL, FREE FROM WEED, SEEDS, SAWDUST AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN SALTS, OR OTHER COMPONENTS DETRIMENTAL TO PLANT UFE. SIZE RANGE OF MULCH SHALL BE FROM 1/2 INCH TO 1 -1/4 INCHES WITH A MAXIMUM OF 20 PERCENT PASSING A 1/2 —INCH SCREEN. STAKING DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE STAKED WITH AT LEAST ONE STAKE, 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE TREES. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE STAKES AT THE END OF THE ONE —YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. EMERGENT PLANTING AREAS : EMERGENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAIL (SEE SHEET WM -7). PART 8 — WOOD FENCE AND INFORMATIVE SIGNS FENCING AND INFORMATIVE SIGN INSTALLATION SPLIT—RAIL CEDAR FENCING SHALL CONFORM WITH CITY STANDARDS AS PER DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET WM -7 UPON COMPLETION OF PLANTING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTACH NGPA SIGNS TO THE FENCE POSTS AND INSTALL ALONG THE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA (NGPA) BOUNDARY AT 100 —FOOT INTERVALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL THE NGPA SIGNS UPON CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION OF THE FENCE. CLEAN —UP LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND DEBRIS FROM THE SITE FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS AND FENCE CONSTRUCTION. PART 9 — WARRANTY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT CRAFTSMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR THIS PROJECT FOR A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR BEGINING AT FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THIS WARRANTY SHALL INCLUDE REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS (SAME SIZE AND SPECIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS) THAT PROVE EITHER TO BE MISLOCATED OR UNSUITABLE AS TO PLANT MATERIAL STANDARDS. EXCEPT FOR LOSS DUE TO EXCESSIVELY SEVERE CLIMATOLOGICAL CONDITIONS (SUBSTANTIATED BY 10 —YEAR RECORDED WEATHER CHARTS), INSTALLED PLANT MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR AGAINST DEFECTS AND UNSATISFACTORY GROWTH, EXCEPT FOR CASES OF NEGLECT BY OWNER OR ABUSE /DAMAGE BY OTHERS. PART 10 FINAL ACCEPTANCE UPON COMPLETION OF THE PLANTING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR WITH A SET OF CLEARLY MARKED PRINTS DESIGNATING THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES OF PLANTINGS WITHIN THE MITIGATION AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A COMPLETE SET OF PRINTS AT THE. JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF "RED— LINING CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE APPROVED PLANS AND SHALL UPDATE SAID INFORMATION ON A DAILY BASIS. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAG INDIVIDUAL PLANT SPECIES AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. EACH PLANT SPECIES SHALL HAVE A DIFFERENT COLOR TAG FOR VISUAL IDENTIFICATION. A COLOR CODED PLANT TAG LEGEND SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR SHALL APPROVE PLANTING LOCATIONS. IF ITEMS ARE TO BE CORRECTED, A PUNCH UST SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR AND SUBMITTED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR COMPLETION. AFTER PUNCH LIST ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR SHALL REVIEW THE PROJECT FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR, THE MONITOR WILL SUBMIT A LETTER OF COMPLETION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. THE LETTER SHALL INDICATE THAT GRADING AND FINAL PLANT INSTALLATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED FINAL PLAN. THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE SHALL CONSTITUTE THE BEGINNING OF THE ONE —YEAR WARRANTY /MAINTENANCE PERIOD AS WELL AS THE 5 —YEAR MAINTENANCE /MONITORING PERIOD AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. PART 11 — MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE WETLAND CONSTRUCTION MONITOR WHO IS FAMILIAR WITH THE STATED GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE MITIGATION PLAN. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CORRECT EROSION AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS THROUGHOUT THE ONE —YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SILT FENCING AT THE END OF THE ONE —YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD AND RESTORE THE FENCE AREA BY HAND SEEDING BETWEEN APRIL 1ST AND OCTOBER 15TH, ALL BARE AREAS GREATER THAN ONE SQUARE FOOT. MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE MITIGATION AREAS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER UNDER DIRECTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WETLAND MONITOR. REQUIRED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ARE INCLUDED IN TABLE 2. PART 12 — MONITORING MITIGATION MONITORING SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A WETLAND BIOLOGIST FOR AVE (5) YEARS WHICH INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION INSPECTION (ONE YEAR WARRANTY INSPECTION). THE OBJECTIVE OF THE MONITORING PROGRAM SHALL BE TO ASSESS REVEGETATION SUCCESS. REPORTS DESCRIBING MONITORING RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, AND U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY DECEMBER 31 OF YEARS 1 THROUGH 5. THE MONITORING RESULTS SHALL BE RELATED TO THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND IF WARRANTED, RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE MADE BASED ON THESE FINDINGS. PART 13 — PERFORMANCE STATNDARDS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS HAVE BEEN ESTABUSHED THAT CORRESPOND TO THE STATED MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. THESE STANDARDS ARE THE PRIMARY FACTORS THAT SHALL BE USED TO MEASURE THE SUCCESS OF THE WETLAND CREATION, WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AND STREAM BUFFER ENHANCEMENT MITIGATION AREAS. IT IS IMPORTANT TO EVALUATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MITIGATION PLAN OVER THE ENTIRE MONITORING PERIOD WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER ALL STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MET. WHILE SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PROVIDE IMPORTANT BENCHMARKS AND SHALL HELP TO DIRECT MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY TABLE 2 PERFORMANDFE STANDARDS AND EFFORTS, THE SUCCESS OF MITIGATION MUST BE MEASURED AGAINST THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE OVERALL MITIGATION PLAN. BY MONITORING THE PROJECT AND COMPARING MONITORING RESULTS TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, A DETERMINATION CAN BE MADE FOR THE NEED TO IMPLEMENT MAINTENANCE EFFORTS OR THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ARE IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 2. PART 14 — MITIGATION APPROACH MITIGATION FOR 1,347 SF (0.03 AC) OF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT FROM THE FOLEY DEVELOPMENT, WILL BE ACCOMPUSHED BY OFF —SITE WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AND CREATION. ENHANCEMENT WILL AMOUNT TO 1,000 SF (0.02 AC) OF EXISTING CATEGORY II WETLAND AND 1,520 SF (0.04 AC) OF CREATED CATEGORY II WETLAND, FOR A TOTAL OF 2,520 SF (0.06 AC) OF MITIGATION PROVIDED. MITIGATION WILL INCLUDE THE PLANTING OF NATIVE TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES THAT PROVIDE IMPROVED VEGETATION AND HABITAT DIVERSITY. PART 15 — GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. REPLACE PERMANENT ON —SITE WETLAND IMPACT TO 1,347 SF OF DEGRADED CATEGORY III WETLAND BY MITIGATING AN OFF —SITE WETLAND APPROVED BY CITY OF TUKWILA. MITIGATION SHALL INCLUDE 1,000 SF OF WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AND 1,520 SF OF CREATION TO CATEGORY II WETLAND. MITIGATION WILL OCCUR BY REMOVING EXISTING INVASIVES, GRADING EXISTING UPLAND TO WETLAND ELEVATIONS AND REPLANTING WITH NATIVE TREES, SHRUBS AND EMERGENT SPECIES THAT WILL PLANT DIVERSITY AND HABITAT. 2. ENHANCE 626 SF OF DEGRADED TYPE IV STREAM BUFFER (ON— SITE). ENHANCEMENT SHALL INCLUDE REPLANTING WITH NATIVE TREES AND SHRUBS. ENHANCEMENT AREA WILL BE PROTECTED WITH SPOT RAIL FENCE AND SENSITIVE AREA SIGNAGE. PART 16 — CONTINGENCY PLAN THE CONTINGENCY PLAN WILL PROVIDE REMEDIATION FOR THE MITIGATION GOALS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN MET. IF THE DESIRED MITIGATION GOALS, AS MEASURED BY THE MONITORING PROGRAM AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, HAVE NOT BEEN MET AND CANNOT BE ACHIEVED THROUGH ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, THEN A DETERMINATION BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND THE PROJECT PROPONENT MAY BE MADE TO REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A CONTINGENCY PLAN. AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE CITY, A CONTINGENCY PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED THAT COMPENSATES FOR THE FAILED GOALS OF THE APPROVED MITIGATION PLAN. IF THE CONTINGENCY PLAN 1S SUBSTANTIAL, THE CITY WILL EXTEND THE MONITORING PERIOD. PART 17 — PERFORMANCE SECURITY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE COMPLETE UNTIL THE MITIGATION PLAN IS INSTALLED, INSPECTED, APPROVED AND BONDED. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THE MITIGATION IS PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING MONITORING AND CONTINGENCIES, THE PROJECT PROPONENT (JEFF FOLEY) WILL PROVIDE A PERFORMANCE BOND FOLLOWING CITY OF TUKWILA PROCEDURES. THE TOTAL COST, PLUS CONINGENCY FEES, WILL BE THE AMOUNT OF THE PERFORMANCE BOND. THE PERFORMANCE BOND WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE FOLLOWING INSTALLATION AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY A. MITIGATION COST ESTIMATE: BOND ESTIMATE (Includes labor, materials, maintenance and monitoring for 5 years, 30% contingency and mobilization) TOTAL COST ESTIMATE: METHODS B. THE PERFORMANCE BOND (120% OF A) IS ESTIMATED TO BE. $ 16,800.00 $ 20,200.00 • aeve cP I 17-1q1°" PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 1. 100 PERCENT SURVIVAL OF ALL INSTALLED NATIVE TREES AND SHRUBS ONE —YEAR POST INSTALLATION OF ALL BUFFER PLANTS. 2. ANNUAL MONITORING FOR SURVIVAL COUNT OF ALL INSTALLED TREES AND SHRUBS. VOLUNTEER NATIVE TREES AND SHRUBS IN WETLAND CREATION /ENHANCEMENT, STREAM BUFFER MONITORING AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB .SURVIVAL: 100% BY YEAR 1, 85% BY YEAR 3, 60% BY YEAR 5. 3. DELINEATION OF WETLAND CREATION AREA AT YEAR 5. 4. AT LEAST 4 NATIVE TREE SPECIES AND 4 NATIVE SHRUB SPECIES SHALL BE PRESENT IN THE MITIGATION AREA. 5. UP TO 20% OF ANY STRATUM CAN BE COMPOSED OF DESIRABLE NATIVE VOLUNTEERS WHEN MEASURING COVER. NO MORE THAN 10% COVER OF NON— NATIVE OR OTHER INVASIVES, E.G., HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY, EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY, REED CANARYGRASS, SCOTS BROOM, ENGLISH IVY, MORNING GLORY, ETC. IS PERMISSIBLE, 0% FOR JAPANESE KNOTWEED, IN ANY MONITORING YEAR. BOND HOLDERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO MAINTAIN MITIGATION SITES WITHIN THESE STANDARDS THROUGHOUT THE MONITORING PERIOD, TO AVOID CORRECTIVE MEASURES. MONITORING METHODS 1. TOTAL PLANT COUNT OF INSTALLED TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL DETERMINE ONE YEAR WARRANTY AND PERFORMANCE STANDARD OF SURVIVAL. 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION SHALL OCCUR WITH EACH MONITORING FROM ESTABLISHED PHOTOPOINTS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION OF PLANT SUCCESS. 3. AT YEAR 5 A MINIMUM OF .04 ACRES OF WETLAND WILL BE PRESENT IN THE WETLAND CREATION AREA. DELINEATION OF THE WETLAND CREATION AREA WILL COMPLY WITH METHODOLOGY CRITERIA AS NOTED IN THE 1987 ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL AND SUPPLEMENTS. MONITORING INTERVAL YEARS 1, 2, 3, (WETLAND AND 4 AND 5 WETLAND BUFFER) YEARS 1, 2, 3, (WETLAND AND 4 AND 5 WETLAND BUFFER; YEARS 1, 2, 3, (WETLAND AND 4 AND 5 WETLAND BUFFER; RECEIVED SCD 2 9 2001 Q a_ cc U a) of 5 RE Q m p3 ai gg z Ica W 0 U- �ISIONS: APPD. 121 -OM KLVISLU r CITY COMMENTS DATE: SEPTEMBER 11 2008 DESIGN: G8K DRAWN: GBK CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: SCALE: PROJECT NUMBER: JEFO0000 - 0001 DRAWING FILE: JEFO_0001, M - 3 SHEET NO. WM OF 7 3 0 L- w 0 0 a O' E 0. a) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Li Lai i EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER, EXISTING WETLAND ENHANCEMEN AREA TLAND CR TI PI AREA i \ Jr � p -_ NC WALL NET ]R GATE AD WITH -' MOTOR 4 30 I � A 6./ 30' 0 N -mi `, 7 A ! / r' � , ( 1 � �w -- . \ , r',...., ( �1 \ o ` ' ' % i ,y \� . 1 \ ✓ I l GRAVEL GRAVEL L -'\ i s- \ `\ kri 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1 " =20' - -- ---- - --- . , • ' I ' ' \ `\, ,f _ �i i'!. 1 i I 0 . \ I I !R ppS Ex, / / I T BE WETLAND • . I GA TI N II§UFFER 14 I CON TRUCTION )ENHANCEMENTI HA CtSS) i I II I t '` 1 11 � I y L � sue \ a I \ / ' I 1 T u. \v - ,L r ) , 411;2 , " -I U I �� j I ) W I II t0 I I R \ t ( I XISTING WETLD /' I • \ i �Ib� W LL ( I W 4, W J.,�, W 1 J.) \ � \, ,J4 ,/ �. ;.� 1 4, c_,,. W I W \ \ 1 , . �- ♦alb --� IR • w \ W W 4 �1' s ��7` `t. . L_ 'J, - ^ \ \ �Y ( 4 lm� J. 's, .I' • '�, ( ■ ` I _ _ _ ,yam \ \ I I I I • I L J 4 L J.1 � W �\ l W - . l L •L Ll Jr JI IJ • 1. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES SEE SHEET WM -2 GRADING NOTES SEE SHEET WM -2 LEGEND EL.1 57.0 IRO CLEARING LIMIT FENCE STRAW WATTLE PROPOSED ELEVATION SPOT • EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING CONTOUR • PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING WETLAND STRAW WA 8 TO 10 INDIES IN CRAMMER STAKE SPACING 4 FT MAXIMUM STAGGER JOINTS. STRAW WATTLE SECTION PLAN VIEW - FLOW WOOD. ST A X A X 24 INDIES TI GHTLY MUTT ADJOINING WATTLES 3 • TO 7 INDIES 8 INDIES MINIMLW RECEIVED IMP 2223 COMMUNWY KIND/VARIETY X BY WEIGHT MIN. X GERM RICE CUTGRASS WESTERN MANA GRASS CANADA REED SPIKE BENTGRASS WOOL -GRASS 45X 40X 10% 3% 2% 90X 90X 90% 90X 90X APPUCATION RATE. 120 LBS /ACRE 2,000 LBS /ACRE 255 LBS /ACRE WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH. 14N- 14P -14K FERTILIZER: GUAR TACKIFIER: 40 LBS /ACRE 3 N 0 u_ u.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. i 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 U- w • rn co 0 0 0 0+ _---:_,; \ I r \ - 1 - , - ,-,„, 1°. 1 \ \, \ - ' I , , 1 I r '. 1 ) 1 �i i I 11 1 1 \ `,, r\ ( ( , ( 1 ( r \ s 1\ \ \ 1 1 I ) ■ ' ll) i ) / ` 1 I 1I I ( r-1-' ( ) .1 i 11 I 1 ` 1 1 1 �� p , / 4 / I ) / r / ^ \ \ ( I I c `, \ > I) ( ( \ 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 I J ° ,4 1 ( 1 \- \ i \ y \ HYDR SEED W/ )11 1 ) I UPI D MIX 1 B I / I. 32 p.o.e.- - / % y1 S11N • SOW J I i I - "AS T BE L F R i FIR f C 1 N , '••, 1 2 a ;I A C _ 1 1 1 MLE 1 4 \ ■ 1 J 1 ( ' 1 r 2( VINE M'ePLE 1 I ' 4 l\ 1 .` 119A�� \ 1 4 ' 'I' 48 - AC 1 2 , IS % \WILLOW; ■, EU 1 1 I I 3 3' 5 \„ I\ I 1 1 \ 1 ■ a ` 2 W 3 A-51 HYD W{{ % � \ ■ ■ \ 1 1 \ \„ \ ` WETLAND 1 R \ WE D M(K ( 1 \ \ \ ` \. ' � -.` �\ _— b BUFFER 6 1 ..1, 1 I" W ( t/1 4 \ \ , , ,I,/ { 4,..............„.4 6)0 STING WETLAND ' /� � I \ � -'l _ \ '-- -'u ,. � 1 1 ' 1 H' ���, .✓ .I,�'" v, s / sk .I, W � ` N' W l i IW ` . .. \\ \ \ • 4 19 J -'-. i .I, /r% .I, 3 \ ` ? 9 ' L .1' �,i, I \ ,I, J 1 .I. I w 1 , WI , I, ,' .I 4, .1 r w '1 1 4, 4, 0 20 40 80 SCALE: 1 "= 20' y\\uuro PLANT SCHEDULE ou l RC SS "0119\ LEGEND 160 BOTANICAL NAME TREES/ LARGE SHRUBS THUJA PUCATA PICEA SITCHENSIS PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII ACER MACROPHYLLUM FRAXINUS LATIFOUA SAUX LASIANDRA NOTE EACH WILLOW SYMBOL IS EOUAL TO 16 LIVE STAKES. SHRUBS ACER CIRCINATUM VINE MAPLE 4 5 GAL AS SHOWN, CORNUS SERICEA RED OSIER DOGWOOD 23 1 GAL 6' O.C. PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS PACIFIC NINEBARK 9 2 GAL 6' O.C. CRATAEGUS DOUGLAS! BLACK HAWTHORN 4 2 GAL 6' O.C. SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS SNOWBERRY 15 1 GAL. - 4' O.C. LONICERA INVO1.UCRATA BLACK TWINBERRY 7 - 1 GAL 4' O.C. DEMLERIA CERASIFORMIS INDIAN PLUM 4 2 GAL 4' O.C. ROSA NUTKANA. NOOTKA ROSE 7 1 GAL 4' O.C. SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA RED ELDERBERRY 7 1 GAL. 4' O.C. EMERGENTS CAREX OBNUPTA SCIRPUS MICROCARPUS UPLAND HYDROSEED MIX EDGE OF 15' WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA STRAW WATTLE t EL157.0 PROPOSED ELEVATION SPOT . . _J EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY / PROPOSED WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING WETLAND SENSITIVE AREA SIGN COMMON NAME OUANIITY CONDITION SITE (HT) WESTERN RED CEDAR SITKA SPRUCE DOUGLAS FIR BIGLEAF MAPLE OREGON ASH PACIFIC WILLOW SLOUGH SEDGE 19 ROOT STOCK SMALL- FRUITED BULRUSH 14 ROOT STOCK KIND/VARIETY BARCLAY PERENNIAL RYEGRASS RED CREEPING FESCUE HARD FESCUE. X BY WEIGHT 70% 20X 10% MIN. X GERM 90% 90X 90% APPUCATION RATE. 220 LBS /ACRE WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH. 2.000 LBS /ACRE 14N- 14P -14K FERTILIZER. 300 LBS /ACRE GUAR TACKIFIER: 50 LBS /ACRE WETLAND HYDROSEED MIX 2 5 GAL 4' HT MIN. AS SHOWN, STAKED. 2 5 GAL 4' HT MIN. AS SHOWN, STAKED. 4 5 GAL 4' HT MIN. AS SHOWN, STAKED 4 5 GAL 6' HT MIN. AS SHOWN STAKED 3 5 GAL 6' HT MIN. 20' O.C., STAKED 144 LIVE STAKES 20" HT MIN. 24' O.C.. UVE STAKES PLANTING NOTES SEE SHEET WM -2 PLANTING DE1ALM: SEE SHEET WM -7 REMARKS 24' O.C. 24" O.C. RECEIVE 'SEP 2 21 LOMMU,,. z F E 95219 W WAS 0115171091 STEREO C. CAGE COI TIE NO. 952 SCALE:1 SHEET NO. REVISIONS: APPD. 8= 71- 081REWSED PER CITY COMMENTS DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2 DESIGN: GBK DRAWN: GBK CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: JEF00000 -0001 DRAWING FILE: JEFO_0001 116 WM -5 OF 7 0 0 N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f LEGEND SPOT RAIL FENCE STREAM CHANNEL FLOW UNE 25' STREAM BUFFER UNE SENSITIVE AREA SIGN EXISTING WETLAND 0 20 • 40 80 SCALE: 1 " =20' 0. RG Sin 95 t PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME TREES/ LARGE SHRUBS THUJA PUCATA PICEA SITCHENSIS FRAXINUS LATIFOUA WESTERN RED CEDAR SITKA SPRUCE OREGON ASH QUANTITY CONDITION NZE H 1 5 GAL 4' HT MIN. 5 GAL 4' HT MIN. 1 5 GAL 6' HT MIN. SHRUBS /CROUNDCOVE 5' O.C. CORNUS SERICEA RED OSIER DOGWOOD 4 1 GAL. 4' O.C. Q SNOWBERRY 6 1 GAL O SYMPHORICARPOS AU3US 6 1 GAL 4' O.C. # LONICERA INVOLUCRATA BLACK TWINBERRY NOOTKA ROSE 6 1 GAL 4' O.C. ROSH NUTKANA WETLAND HYDROSEED MIX KIND ARIETY RICE CUTGRASS WESTERN MANA GRASS CANADA REED SPIKE BENTGRASS WOOL -GRASS 45% 40% 10% 3% 2% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% APPLICATION RATE' WOOD CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH: 14N- 14P -14K FERTILIZER: — GUAR TACKIFIER: 120 LBS /ACRE 2,000 LEIS /ACRE 255 LEIS/ACRE 40 LBS /ACRE % BY WEIGHT REMARKS AS SHOWN, STAKED. AS SHOWN, STAKED. AS SHOWN, STAKED. RECEIVED .gyp 2 2 2008 .. vvrI OPME:JT J 0 Z z Q w � Aw cc Cli ua Z32 2 Q �u 0 LL REVISYOiT a• STATE a NA9R GTON TIMED ARUfECT 4•/3.453 AM C. GAGE EICATE No. sea m ' - UI v o > W a _ 8°, Y l3 N • O m > € •th -Ba 04 Es C m Z SCALE: 1"..20 SHEET NO. DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 200E DESIGN: EIK DRAWN: GBK CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: JEFOOOOO -0001 DRAWING PILE: WRLC6_SBRP -WM WM -6 0 0 0 cn E 0 N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL w 0 E 0 co 0 cn 01 0 0 3" MIN. 0 ROOT BALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING Stream Buffer Sensitive Area Boundary Help protect and care for this area. Noe wawa gane.• Gmar.w aNMN aY Lad Dw"aww.t - W10 •1N0 NOTES 1. THE SENSITNE AREA SIGN SHALL RE POSTED AT THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE SENSRNE AREA BUFFER SETBACK AREA OR SETBACK TRACT AND THE BUILDING SETBACK AREA 2. ONE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED PER LOT FOR EVER! 100 FEET OF SENSITIVE AREA BUFFER AND SHALL BE STATIONED PER THE LOCATIONS ON THE APPROVED PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SIGNS MAY ALSO BE ATTACHED 10 FENCES. 3 SIGNS SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE WITH CRY OF IMPALA STMIOAROS. SENSITIVE AREA SIGN ROOT CROWN 2 " -4" ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE 3" BARK MULCH, HOLD BACK 2" -3" FROM MAIN STEM 3" HIGH RIM BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX FINISH GRADE LOOSEN ROOT BALLS, STRAIGHTEN OR PRUNE CIRCUNG ROOTS BEFORE PLANTING. FERTIUZER PER PLANTING NOTES AMENDED SOIL PER PLANTING NOTES EXISTING SUBGRADE FIRMLY HANG COMPACT 3 MOUND 8ELOW ROOTBALL NOT TO SCALE EXISTING SUBGRADE W PRINTED METAL SIGN CEDAR POST ATTACH SIGN TO POST 10TH TWO 5/16 GALVANIZED LAG BELTS WITH WASHERS (TYP) DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING CONCRETE FOOTING NOT TO SCALE ROOT BALL PLASTIC LOCK STRIP (1) 2X2 HARDWOOD STAKE REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR ROOT CROWN 1 " - ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE 3" BARK MULCH, HOLD BACK 2w - AWAY FROM MAIN STEM r HIGH RIM BERM HYDROSEED W /SPECIFIED SEED MIX FINISH GRADE AMENDED SOIL PER PLANTING NOTES FERTIUZER PER PLANTING NOTES LOOSEN ROOT BADS, STRAIGHTEN OR PRUNE CIRCLING ROOTS BEFORE PUNTING. FIRMLY HAND COMPACT r MOUND BELOW ROOTBALL NOT TO SCALE EXISTING SUBGRADE • N EN MIN Ell �_: MEM SPOT RAIL FENCE SHRUB PLANTING NOTTI - SCALE ccT ROOT CROWN 1 " -2" ABOVE PLANTING SOIL GRADE y 1Y 3 BARK MULCH, HOLD BACK 2 " -3" AWAY FROM MAIN STEM 3" HIGH RIM BERM HYDROSEED AS SPECIFIED FINISH GRADE AMENDED SOIL PER PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FERTILIZER PER PLANTING NOTES LOOSEN ROOT BALLS, STRAIGHTEN OR PRUNE CIRCUNG ROOTS BEFORE PLANTING. FIRMLY HAND COMPACT r MOUND BELOW ROOTBALL NOT TO SCALE 18" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 LEAF NODES EXPOSED INSERT STAKE WITH BUDS POINTING UP USE CUTTINGS 30" MIN., 1 /2 " 3 /4'DIA. SOIL uru —��— II—II =11 =If II' '1 =11 =11.. =.II: -11. .11=11= 91= 1-11 1E tl =h = '! 11 =1f 11- 11= ,` -11 =ii 1 11 11=1 11 =1f 11 11. 11� ;II 11 1 11 =11 =1. =11 =11. =11 =11 =. C= 11 =.I I1 =Ilt . 11=1! h• =11 =1 11 =11 CUT END TO A POINT AND PRE -DRILL PILOT HOLE FOR EASIER INSTALLATION LNE STAKE PLANTING ROOT STOCK EMERGENT PLANTING CUT TOP SQUARE FOR EASIER INSTALLATION, PROTECT TOP FROM SPOTTING. WATER DEPTH VARIES WITH SEASON AND LOCATION. FINISHED GRADE NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE TRIM OFF BRANCHES WITH CLEAN CUTS MIN. BURIAL 12" INTO SOIL HAND PLANT ROOT STOCK IN PREPARED SOIL MEDIUM MIN. 4" ENSURE GOOD SOIL TO ROOT CONTACT BY HAND. NOT TO SCALE RECEIVED sip 2 2 2008 ODEVVEL001 E T a_ cc ' _ g '^ V! as 0 < Zhz 0 Q m CO a co q m Z m Q l� - 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED ♦RGHIECT REVISIONS: APPD. 8001 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2 DESIGN: GBK DRAWN: GBK CHECKED: JCGA REVISION NUMBER SCALE: PROTECT NUMBER: UEF:00000-0001 DRAWING FDE: JEF0_0001 _M-4 SHEET NO. WM -7 OF 7