The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L07-035 - BRADLEY JESSICA - WELLS FARGO BANK / SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTWELLS FARGO 6855 S 180 ST L07 -035 Project Description: City of Tukwila NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank, Applicant Wells Fargo Bank, Owner, ATTN: Tom Dawes King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe I. PROJECT INFORMATION Location: 6855 S. 180 Street, Tukwila, WA Associated Files: L07 -037, Design Review; E07 -009 Comprehensive Plan Tukwila Urban Center Designation/Zoning Tukwila Urban Center District: Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Project File Number: L07 -035 Applicant: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank, Type of Permit Applied for: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Steven M. Mullet, Mayor December 4, 2007 construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt up building with associated parking and a stand alone over -flow parking lot, portions of which fall within the 200 foot shoreline environment. IL DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: X determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. CL Page 1 of 2 12/04/2007 10:17:00 AM t7 \Wells Farun11 07 -035 NOD dor. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 L07 -035 Wells Fargo Shoreline ubstantial Development Permit Notice of Decision December 4, 2007 • The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. The land use application for design review on this project is pending; a public hearing before the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will be held on this application Thursday, December 13, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS One administrative appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board of the Decision is permitted. Any person appealing to the Shorelines Hearings Board may raise certain SEPA issues as part of the appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appellants should consult the rules and procedures of the Shorelines Hearings Board for details. CL Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 NOD.doc IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING The requirements and procedures for appeals to the Shorelines Hearings Board are set forth in RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. V. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period unless an appeal is filed. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Page 2 of 2 12/04/2007 11:07:00 AM • Cizy of Tukwila 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 20007 TO: Jack Pace, Director, Department of Community Development FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner RE: Shoreline Permit: L07 -035 Wells Fargo CV Operations Building The project involves the construction of a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building with a 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking for storage and sorting/processing of paper products and a separate parking lot to serve two existing buildings within 200 feet of the Green River, a shoreline of the State. The existing buildings owned by Wells Fargo are a former bank building used as a training facility and a data processing facility. The additional parking will provide overflow capacity for all the Wells Fargo facilities. The parcels are identified in the aerial photo on page 2. Attachment A is a set of plans including a copy of the site plan, and a copy of the landscaping plan. 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The Shoreline Master Program establishes three management environments adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Environment: An impact buffer area which provides for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. Low Impact Environment: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. Steven M Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 High Impact Environment: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below along with a discussion of the proposed project. City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: Overall Goals: 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats, which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. CL Page 2 of 12 12/04/2007 9:07:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • Response: The proposed project is to construct a concrete tilt -up building that will be used for processing paper materials for Wells Fargo Bank. The stand alone parking area will provide overflow parking to support the existing Wells Fargo buildings (a training facility and another processing facility) as well as the new one. The project is located in an area of the City designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map as Tukwila Urban Center and is taking place on a parcel of land located within a small office /industrial park. Adjacent land uses consist of other industrial buildings within the industrial park, across the river is an office park and City of Kent park. The Green River Trail is located on the south side of the new building site and the east side of the new parking area. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site along the river. The project will not discharge storm water directly into the river or otherwise impact the shoreline environment. Given the nature of the development, the project will promote economic development through the construction of a new building which will house new jobs in the City, which is one aspect of enhancing the public interest. The new bank facility will employ 20 individuals initially and may employ up to 30 -35 individuals at maximum capacity. The project will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River — the river is not navigable in this portion of the river except for kayaks and canoes. There are no known culturally significant features on the site. The project will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) has identified a section of the riverbank damaged in the winter storms of 2006 just upstream from this site which is in need of immediate repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the COE to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. The width of the current levee easement does not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies the applicant has been requested to provide additional easement area to allow the levee to be set back at a maximum slope of 2.5 to 1. The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and to grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila (TMC 16.52.100 C.). Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require that the property owner grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If the additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The requested easement width is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The applicant has agreed to grant the additional easement area for the future levee repair. CL Page 3 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Public access to the river is available on the Green River Trail, which runs along the top of the levee and borders both the building site and the parking lot site. This trail meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. Economic Development Element Goals: 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is enhanced. 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with shoreline goals and policies. Response: As noted above, the project will construct a 12,983 square foot office /warehouse building and a stand alone parking lot to support the existing wells Fargo buildings located in the same industrial complex. The project will generate construction jobs during the time the building is under construction and permanent employment for approximately 20 people initially and possibly up to 35 people at maximum capacity and to that extent enhances the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila. Public Access Element Goals: • • 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of Tukwila..... 4. Encourage public access to privately owned shorelines, consistent with private property rights. 5. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. Response: The goals of this section relate to providing public access to the river. There is a public trail system that runs the length of the Green River. In this portion of the river, the trail is located on the top of the levee that borders both development sites. A pedestrian trail has been worn into the undeveloped site as a short cut from S. 180 Street to the trail and bridge that crosses the river just upstream from the new building site. The applicant will provide a paved trail linking the public sidewalk to the trail to replace the informal trail that is already there. CL Page 4 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Circulation Element Goals: Recreational Element Goals: Shoreline Use Element Goals: View of informal trail looking toward S. 180` Street View of informal trail looking towards Green River & trail The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads or public facilities within the shoreline. Internal circulation will be provided to the new building in the Low Impact Environment of the shoreline via Sperry Drive. 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. Response: A public trail system runs along the Green River from Auburn to the City of Seattle, alternating sides of the river on which it is located. On this section of the river, the trail is located on the south side of the proposed new building on the top of the levee and to the east of the proposed new parking lot. The trail is used by pedestrians, bike riders and runners. As noted above, the applicant will pave the informal trail that links S. 180 Street with the bridge crossing the Green River and the trail on top of the levee just southwest of the site. 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. CL Page 5 of 12 12/04/2007 9:07:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline StaffRpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Response: The project site is located in an oxbow of the Green River. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Section 205 levee has been constructed along the left bank of this portion of the river. The proposed paper processing facility is consistent with the zoning and land use designation and is appropriate for its location in the office /industrial park. The proposed parking area to support the existing buildings is located on a separate parcel. The project is consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Two other facilities owned by Wells Fargo are located in the same industrial park; the development of the last 2 remaining parcels will provide efficiencies for the property owner. Conservation Element Goals: 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. Response: The natural character of the river in the area of the proposed project has been altered to a major extent due to the construction of the levee which provides flood protection throughout the urban center. Native plantings will be used in the landscape area located within the shoreline environment. Storm water from the site will be detained and then discharged to the P17 pond to the north. Current COE requirements do not permit planting trees and other vegetation on the levee or in the levee prism. Some time in the future the levee adjacent to the building site will be reconstructed to a less steep slope — this will provide an opportunity to include a bench that can be planted with vegetation that improves fish habitat. 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: • • Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: CL Page 6 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed use, a paper processing facility is a permitted use in that zone. The Tukwila Board of Architectural will review the project at a public hearing to consider the design of the building and the landscaping plan. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 2, above is a discussion of the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; Response: No existing vegetation within the River Environment will be disturbed due to this project. The portion of the site immediately adjacent to the river is already developed with an existing paper processing building with associated parking and landscaping on the site perimeter. The levee bank adjacent to the river is covered with blackberries, but there is formal landscaping on the north side of the trail on the other side of the chain link fencing that adjoins the trail. The landscaping provided by the new development will be placed on the outside of the new fencing that will be installed. Native plants will be used in the shoreline area. S. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and will drain to the storm water pond just north of Costco. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. CL Page 7 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be altered by the construction of this project. When the levee is reconstructed along this portion of the river, habitat opportunities will be improved by the addition of a bench that will be planted with trees that will provide shade and other plant materials that will enhance fish and wildlife habitat. 8. All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Response: A land altering permit will be required for this project. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be installed to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed to convey storm water from the site. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: No federal permits are required. The State Department of Ecology will review the shoreline permit. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is involved with this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: Solid waste will not be disposed along the river 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. CL Page 8 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • Response: The property owner will dedicate additional easement area to accommodate the set back of the levee in the future. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. Response: This project does not propose any landfilling within the river channel. 15. ...(R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: No trees within the shoreline environments will be removed from the site. One cottonwood tree, outside the shoreline, in the stand alone parking area will be removed to construct the parking lot. B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. River Environment uses are restricted to footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The River Environment on this site ends approximately behind the pedestrian/bicycle path. No improvements or development are proposed within the River Environment on this site. C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the river environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking/loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. The following development standards apply: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations. Response: No structures are located in the Low Impact Environment. Landscaping, parking and drive aisles are located in the low impact environment on this site. CL Page 9 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking/loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; Response: Internal vehicle circulation to the rear of the building runs along the south side of the building. This internal circulation system is located more than 10 feet from the building. An access road for maintenance of the levee system is located along the top of the levee. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six-foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d. Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: A cyclone fence with slats is proposed to run the length of the south side of the site connecting to the existing fencing. Landscaping, using native plants, will be placed on the outside of the fencing to help screen the site from view of the trail. The parking, drive aisles and the proposed new building are below the top of the levee and therefore mostly screened from view of anyone on the river; the building and parking area can be seen from the trail. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking/loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. 4. COMMENTS: Comments were received during the Notice of Application period from the Muckelshoot Indian Tribe (see pages 7 and 8 of Attachment B, SEPA staff report) The issues raised in the e-mail were addressed through the analysis of environmental impacts of the proposed project in the SEPA staff report. CL Page 10 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 5. SEPA: • • A determination of non - significance was issued on November 19, 2007. The comment/appeal period closed on December 3, 2007 at 5:00 p.m.; no appeals or comments were received on the DNS. A copy of the SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment B). CONCLUSIONS 1. The project site is located in a light industrial park and is designated Tukwila Urban Center on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed project, a tilt up concrete building for paper processing is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use is a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building with a 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking for employees. The building will be used for processing paper. Adjacent uses consist of another building owned by Wells Fargo, also used for paper processing, light industrial buildings across the river to the south and big box retail located across S. 180 Street to the north. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site on the south and east along the river. 3. The project will promote economic development in the City, enhance the stability of the levee when it is reconstructed in the future, and will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. 4. There are no known culturally significant features on the site. Development of the site will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. 5. Public access is available on the south side of the site on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on the right and left banks of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. Pedestrians have worn an informal trail from the sidewalk on S. 180 Street to the bridge that crosses the Green River near the southwest corner of the site. The property owner will construct a paved path to formalize this connection to the trail. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: a) The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. b) No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; c) The project will not disrupt existing trees or vegetation within the river environment. No cottonwood trees within the river environment or low impact environment will be removed by this project. d) No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be detained on site and eventually will discharge into the detention pond just north of Costco. CL Page 11 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be used to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures during construction. e) The project will be required to comply with all state and federal water quality regulations. f) Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project. The easement being granted by the property owner to the King County Levee District will permit the eventual set back of the levee so that a planted vegetative bench can be established. g) All necessary permits will be obtained for this project. h) The project does not involve any dredging or mining. i) No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Additional easement area is needed to set the levee back at the correct slope to prevent future slumping. The applicant has agreed to grant this additional easement area. j) No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. The River Environment on this site includes the levee and Green River Trail and ends approximately on the north side of the trail. Any landscaping that falls in this environment will be comprised of native plants. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment provided item 8.B. is complied with. a) The structure is sited according to the Tukwila Urban Center zone in which it is located. Landscaping is provided according to the requirements of that zone, with 15 feet in the front as well as more than 10 feet on the side along Sperry Drive and 10 feet on the rear along the Green River Trail. Native plant material will be used in the shoreline environments. Additional easement area will be dedicated to King County for reconstruction of the levee at a future date. b) Parking, loading and storage facilities will be screened from the river in the following ways: a cyclone fence with slats will run the length of the rear of the property, with the landscaping to be planted on the outside of the fence. Due to the levee, the parking area is located below the levee prism and hidden from view from the river. c) No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the Notice of Application period. Issues raised by these comments were addressed in the SEPA staff report. 10. A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on November 19, 2007; no comments or appeals were received by the 5:00 p.m. December 3, 2007 deadline. 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the shoreline substantial development permit. CL Page 12 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc December 14, 2007 CL Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 NOD.doc • City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, Applicant Tom Dawes, Project Manager, for Wells Fargo Bank, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Laura Murphy, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project . and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L07 -037 Applicant: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, for Wells Fargo Bank Type of Permit Applied for: Design Review Project Description: construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt up building with 5,682 sq. ft. truck load/unload area and truck turn around and associated employee parking on one parcel and a 56 stall stand alone over flow parking lot within the Riversbend Office/Industrial Park. Both parcels lie within the 200 shoreline environment Location: Sperry Drive and S. 180 Street Associated Files: E07 -008, SEPA review; L07 -035, Shoreline Substantial Development permit Comprehensive Plan Tukwila Urban Center/ Tukwila Urban Center Desianation/Zoning District: II. DECISION • SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has: X determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS). Page 1 of 3 12/14/2007 1:11:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Notice of Decision L07 -037: Wells Fargo Bank December 14, 2007 • Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Board of Architectural Review has determined that the application for approval of the building's design and landscaping does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the conditions which are set forth in the Decision and noted below: 1. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to include evergreen trees along the front of the site to provide some year -round color as well as revise the plant material to avoid conflicts with utility lines. The revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR design approval. 2. Revise location of building to avoid conflicts with utility easements; the revised building location shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR design approval. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Council of the Board of Architectural Review decision is permitted. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by Friday, January 4, 2008 at 5:00 p.m. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee of $205. CL Page 2 of 3 12/14/2007 1:11:00 PM Q: Wells Fargo1L07 -037 NOD.doc Notice of Decision L07 -037: Wells Fargo Bank December 14, 2007 • • V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The City Council hearing regarding the appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the Council based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The City Council decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila CL Page 3 of 3 12/14/2007 1:11:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 NOD.doc ..,• ®� l i i 0'1 "IAp11100f i j il i1nit I • 1 1 1111 0 1 iii (i 1 l w 72858 2 a A 18215 7245 A4EIAJE SOUTH Ia 4T, WA 98032 (425)251 -0222 (425)251 -8702 FAX as u<+mea LUC ewoea ■A■n.e. °nwa.mma melm i iii lopi ■ I �1146 ;i ilpip ing 1 n�iiiipplq i 1 ! ghlf a; v ,eli'i! 1 !' i 1 1 11 e . 1,1 40 1 3 e ` clettt! ■itBt �� li i ! ! t ;>1a ;i, Ra■i'!B i• 1 'IR R s ■yR, 0 9 . 1° 4E 11 § '1 II 1 1i9i p11:131 111.1 aBlIII'I a B, B,1R! 1' Ph ! �B ! IBt1 ; sl B "a RR It t 1■ 1 " ■t 1 1" °.1 re§ " �i 1 i 2.1 1 ��i i t 1 g ,11; i 1 le� II 1 1 ; ' 11 1 l � 9191 I ;1 ` I ' i ■I! i : !I R1 1 ! I1 ! "l 111'. ! O 33 11 .I 1;I; II I II •' !1I . I. .i 1n . , 1 !i , Pon CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SURE 405 SEATTLE, WASB BNOTON 98101 li I11 i� lil ij 1 1l � I! 4111,iI !! 1 ela p reae. • -0 ' l i:l st i pt tll1� ■1� if! '1 I0BB3 1., ,� R• � o f 1 1 ;1' i 11111 F ■� RIi 11;1 i;■ i B • �9 !R i 1 1 j° 11 ,`�3 1B I N , I '■ # e ari ii ! 11 , a • ■ Ii■ I I er 1 0, Id I■n Tao COVER SHEET WELLS FARO° - CV OPERATION 1'JKWILA, WASH e.,vma-Atn3Ar - ,xd -o:« .e.m •., * •..• � November 19, 2007 • To: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects Tom Dawes, Project Manager, Wells Fargo Bank Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor PROJECT: FILE NUMBERS: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: Ciz of Tukwila • Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION Wells Fargo CV Operations Building and Parking Lot E07 -009 L07 -035 (Shoreline Permit), L07 -037 (Design Review) Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, for Wells Fargo Bank Construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up building and a 56 stall stand -alone parking lot on two separate parcels, both of which fall within the shoreline of the Green River. S. 180 Street and Sperry Drive This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non - significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3661 for further information. This decision is appealable to King County Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). CL .. --trni nnn unn d Page 1 of I 11/19/2007 1:52:00 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Applicant: JESSICA BRADLEY Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township /Range: File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: Jack Pac espons' le O icial City of Tu a 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Cif Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http://wwwatukwila.wa.us • DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E07 -009 05/25/2007 11/19/2007 ISSUED Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: 12,983 sf of new tilt up concrete building for storage of paper products. 5682 sf covered truck loading for distribution of product. Parcel B is parking lot for 56 cars. 6855 S 180 ST TUKW 3623049095 36 -23-04 The t "ity has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by hue" 3 , 2 " x " The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Ai, it —) Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I• C o ro l L j ab HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing v 1 � Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: VWs Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: Eel- OO'1 Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance C.etiA 06 Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 1 1 day of Nover0b14 the year 20 O r\ P: ADM! NLSTRATIVEFORMSwORMSWFFIDAVITOFDISTRIm (TInN Project Name: VWs : 11v e s o L' Oce/0 of s FF[d9 . Project Number: Eel- OO'1 Mailer's Signature: C.etiA 06 Person requesting mailing: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 1 1 day of Nover0b14 the year 20 O r\ P: ADM! NLSTRATIVEFORMSwORMSWFFIDAVITOFDISTRIm (TInN 111 S.. ARMY CORPS OF ENGI RS FEDERAL. HIGHWAY ADMI TION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WLDLIFE () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF FISHERIES TRADE WLDU FEONC DEV. () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT 111 () FIRE DISTRICT 12 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DMSION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC O KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE X( TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT BRARY ,, (j NTON UBRARY () KENT UBRARY _ . () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY () CHEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) 1UKWMLA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBUC WORKS () FIRE () POUCE () FINANCE () PINING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ()CITY CUERK ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: ADMINISTRATIVEWFORMSTHKLIST.DOC r U c Av (k 32 clivr t '—e I <A o X 10 1 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV 14 DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DMSION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKUST W/ DETERMINATIONS SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES SCHOOLSIUBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM 334.F1SHEFUES PROGRAM ON I Z deAn W a I I e4r6 ( ) WILDUFE PROGRAM MEDIA U..7. CryvIR JIsWI J I () U.S. DEPT H.U.O. () NATIONAL INE FISHERIES SERVICE ( ) HEALTH DEPT () PORT OFSEATTL_E... ,. iC ,DEV bTENVIR INFO CNTR ( ) KC. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL .K-C LAN D&'WATERRRESOURCES dFosTE I RARY , IC C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHUNE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT 820 ( ) WATER DISTRICT 0125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBUC WORKS () BRYN MAWR LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT .5-ruff , O O r -t µoTlu- or bt4-, r $1`r -PaNNING- () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKW ILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - OCW () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATEOPWG PROJ. ig.puwaraisH INDIAN TRIBE (' ) P.S. AIR POLWTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON OUWAMISM RIVER ( ) HIGHUNE TIMES ( ) CLTUKWILAWA.US.WWW • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L07 -035 Applied: 05/25/2007 Approved: 12/04/2007 Expiration: 12/04/2009 Upor. the following property: Address: 6855 S 180 ST TUKW Parcel Number: 3623049095 Section/Township/Range: 36 -23 -04 City ceTukwila • Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http://www.citukwila.wa.us A permit is hereby granted to: JESSICA BRADLEY, FOR WELLS FARGO BANK to: Construct new 12,983 sq. ft. tilt up concrete building for storage of paper products. 5,682 sf covered truck loading for distribution of product on parcel A. Parcel B is stand alone over flow parking lot for 56 cars. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: Promote reasonable & appropriate use of shorelines; encourage econ. develop. & public access. Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and any conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) .AND WAC 173-14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may only be appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within 21 -days from the filing of this permit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For more detail information on appeals, refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. af Date t Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two (2) years from the effective date of the permit (the date the permit is filed with D.O.E.), per RCW 90.58.143(4). doc: SHORELINE5 Jack ace, Director of Department of Community Development L07 -035 Printed: 12 -04 -2007 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non- Significance Project Name: \10 ell 1 .1avi 0 LV by i c2 Et Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's Signature: Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance • Person requesting mailing: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action • Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application . Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit • _ _ FAX To Seattle Times • Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this '1' day of t-• in the year 20 01 P: IADMINISTRATIVEFORMSTORMSUFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION Project Name: \10 ell 1 .1avi 0 LV by i c2 Et Project Number: . L 01-- 0 3., Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: C-cat. l L v m Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this '1' day of t-• in the year 20 01 P: IADMINISTRATIVEFORMSTORMSUFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION ( ) U.S. ARMY GUFir Ur Cnvu.c�rw () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMI TION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT $11 ' () FIRE DISTRICT 02 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT () TUKWILA UBRARY () RENTON UBRARY () KENT LIBRARY - () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY () QWEST () SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE () POUCE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR () CITY CLERK OTHER LOCAL AGEN ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE )4 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( CULTURAL RESOU ES PROGRAM � U/G� I e+�S 'FISHERIESRR _ m401, ) () SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL KING COUNTY AGENCIES DMSION () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAIIIRINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES W EPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. 10 EC.OL•_QG.NS-.SHH. OREU NO DIV () DEPT OF ECOLOGY.,.SE,P,A„AMSION' OFFICE OF_ATTORNEY' GENERAL'• • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION () HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) KC. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC UBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES MEDIA P: WDMTNISTRATIVEIFORMSTHKLIST.D S S2 S S ( C Gam- Srac , Ovcd -f Avca t tea S (q3 Z f4isr A.,e_ . sL "k `1 oz u-te , LAM 49 0 1 ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT 5125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBUC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERANATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF AU. SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. • CIES () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES O CI.TUKWIL VVA.US.WWW. t P • ( Nona �� DWI • go p vx- SR1'A MAIL1PIGJ Mail to: (comment period starts oat a of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Mew Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice • of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that writtencomments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 2I-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section . State Attorney General 'Applicant . *Indian Tribes . 'Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attornev General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, 'etc: from PMI's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ ADMINISTRATIVEIFORMS\CHKUST.DOC Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 Applicant Information: Name: Jessica Bradley for Wells Fargo Bank Address: Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206 - 720 -7001 Is the applicant the property owner? No Location of the property: NW 36 -23 -04 Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Notice of Application Date: 6/25/2007 By: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner, City of Tukwila Phone Number: (206) 431 -3661 To: Date of Transmittal: 12/4/2007 Date of Receipt: Type of Permit: Substantial Development Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant's Representative: Name: Same Address: Phone: Department of Ecology ATTN: Sandra Lange NW Regional Office 3190 160 Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Description of Project: Construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up building for paper processing with associated employee parking and a stand alone 56 stall over -flow parking lot on two separate parcels, both of which are located within the 200 ft. shoreline environment. Final Decision Date: 12/04/2007 CL Page 1 of 1 12/04/2007 10:40:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Ecology Cover Sheet.doc March 3, 2008 • • Dear Ms. Murphy: Cizy of Tukwila Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Ms. Laura Murphy, Tribal Archaeologist Muckleshoot Preservation Program 39015 172 " Avenue S.E. Auburn, WA 98092 RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations Building E07 -009 Thank you very much for your December 19, 2007 letter requesting that the applicant for the Wells Fargo CV Operations building conduct an archaeological field study for the project site. I am enclosing a copy of the report prepared for Wells Fargo on archaeological potential for the building site. The site investigations indicate no evidence of prehistoric or historic activities at the sixteen auger probes. The applicant .will also added a note to the civil drawings of the building permit to alert the contractor to what actions are required if archaeological resources are encountered during construction. A copy of this proposed language is also enclosed. When the building permit is issued, the project will be subject to a number of conditions, including TMC 18.50. 110, Archaeological/Paleontological Information Preservation Requirements. A copy of this section of Municipal Code is enclosed for your review. Please let me know if you have questions. I can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, L o i/ Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects Stephanie Kramer, Assistant State Archaeologist, DAHP CL Q: \Wells Fargo\Murphy.doc Page 1 of 1 03/04/2008 9:54:00 AM Jim Haggerton, Mayor 61/1/1 [`....aL ...... a..- D.... M.......i C..: ... 41/1/1 s T..1. '1.. id /....A:....a.... 1)0100 a 0i........ 1/IA All 1A 711 .. C., ... 1/)A A11 7A AC 1 CRY LiCd T ■IED - 588'52'36"E 313.57 51T 1.4 P`L OPEPT( t()CATON, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OA. NOT BY POTHOL ING THE "rjN PRIOR 10 CGNSTRt,'CT,ON. ` AND TI ION POTI10LINC RCSS-NGS 10 R 4YSICALLY ;. +JD UTILITIES AS S•I11WN ON THESE t N ANO ARL SUB./ELT TC VARIATION. ' 4 ; ?ARGHAUSEN 9nC 1ri PRn,,EEDIN4 WITH S88'54 280.75' \\ 83 (91) WASHINGTON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE 2 VatIICAL DATUM IS THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988. BENCHMARK IS THE BENCHMARK IS WASHINGTON S' ATE DOT MONUMENT NO 8M17099 -78. TAKFN AS 16.545 FEET. 3. PROPERLY AREA = 1 50. FT. (1.5 7 11 AC_RL 4 TAX PARCEL NUt1.BI:R ON THE Su[TJIL1 PiIOPIR1r (5• 182404 9003.00 5 UNDERGROUND URI.ME5 AND aATURLS OLPICTCU HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD OBSERVATION, MARKINGS, D t : , PLANS. AND/OR Av4'LABLE PECORD DOCUMENTS ONI t THE TRUE OC ATION. N * AND, a L 7p LGW >RDUN) FFJITJRCS, DETECTED OR to.'"*" 1) r' :'ERIFIFD POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE NOTES tdd`c ° .xfl. +it141*si7l tir.sYrxia;rrxta►tylt,atl.i. Yorottv.ly .: «r - ar ri..v1.-•n-ra;; ^:) 2 CON'RACTOR AND EXCAVATION SUBCONTRACTOR SHALT. ADHERE TO CITY AND STATE RFGUtAT ONS REGARDING r.1E PGTENTIAL PRESENCE Or ARC'iACOLOCICAL t.ESOURCES (PER CH. 2S 4N WAC. CH 27.34. 27.53. 27.44, 79.01, AND 79.90 RCW). .5 DURING :.ONSTRUCTION. 9 RLSOURL'ESS 0= POTENTIAL ARCItACLOCICAL SIGNIFICANCE ARE ENCOUNTERED DUR:NC CONSTRUCTION ON EXCAVATON. THE OWNER AND/OR RFSP(PIS'E11 T PARTIES ;FA..(. • STCI' '1 ;Nl 'MMEDIATE'.Y AND N016'f ,11'I) (CRAIG F,.AMME 206 233- 1223) AND THE WASHINGTON 5IATE ARCHALLOGIST AT (Ht. SIA1E OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND I.IISTCRIC PRESfr?dAI :ON (OANWP). THE PROCEDURES OUJLItILO 1.N A A OF :'!RECTOR'S RULE 2 -89 FOR A`iST:S:iMUr41 AtJEJ /OR 'R01F.CIION 01 PO;IEN11141 SIGNIFICANT ARCHAELOG;CAI. RESOURCES SHNL BE FCE!1I +f -D. ABIDE RY ALL RLCULA "IONS PERTAINING TO DISCOVERY AND EXCAVATION OE ARCHA LOGICAL RESOURCES, INGLUDINC UU1 NOT LIMOFiI 10 CHAPTER :7.34, 27:.'3. 77.44, 79.01, AND 79.90 RCW AND CHA°TF.R 75.48 MAC, AS APRIICABIE, ON 1HE " SJCCESSORS. INDEX OF SHEETS ~� C1 OF 5 C2 OF 5 C3 OF 5 C4 OF 5 C5 OF 5 COVER SHEET GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL / DEMOLITION PLAN / TEMPORARY DEWATERING PLAN. T.E.S.0 NOTES V 3 ONMW (,2.o.©s 1-00roso A {k(,oQ -1 T`Qlv rt/A\I 182 GAL SURT "•s Carol Lum - Re: WF: CV Operations - Archaeology Report • From: Carol Lumb To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Date: 02/28/2008 10:46 am Subject: Re: WF: CV Operations - Archaeology Report Hi Jessica: I will review report and then send to the Muckleshoots - hopefully this will resolve any concerns they have. I'D cc you on my letter to the Tribe. Thanks. Carol Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Dept. of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3661 (Fax: 206 - 431 -3665) »> "Jessica Bradley" <iessica(acraftarchitects.com> 02/28/2008 9:38 am »> Tom and Carol: Attached find Cascadia Archaeology's final report describing their survey findings of our CV operations site. No cultural material was encountered and no further action is required (as long as the project proceeds as planned). Carol: Is there something specific that you would like us do with this report? Best regards, Jessica Bradley Project Manager Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 p: 206.720.7001 f: 206.720.2949 www.crafta rch itects.com Original Message From: Jana Boersema fmailtoaanaboersema(hotmail .coml Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 5:29 PM To: iessicaCcacraftarchitects.com Subject: Archaeology Report Hi Jessica, Thanks for your quick reply to my previous email. I've attached a PDF copy of the completed report for your review. I will put two hard copies in the mail tomorrow. You may print/copy as many copies as you need for submission to the appropriate agencies. One of the hard copies that I will send has the DAHP cover sheet, and should be submitted to the Department of Carol Lum - Re: WF: CV Operations - Archaeology Report Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia. Thank you for the opportunity to work on this project. Jana Boersema Project Manager Cascadia Archaeology Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! http://bimestloser.msn.com/ 2 [Carol Lumb - Re: WF: CV Operations ii haeological significance From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Jessica: Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 01/17/2008 12:36 pm Re: WF: CV Operations - archaeological significance Thank you for your response on the request by the Muckleshoot Tribe for the archaeological field study. We will support your approach of providing the action plan based on the reasons you provided: previous site disturbance for the construction of the levee, existing building and utilities and the fact that excavation depth will be minimal for the new building. Please submit the action plan as soon as possible so I can provide it as part of our response to the Tribe for their review. Well see if this approach is acceptable to the Tribe. If not, it may be that you will need to have someone on site during excavation to monitor for archaeological artifacts. Please also see TMC 18.50.110 for our current code requirements as they relate to archaeological preservation requirements. I'm waiting for an answer from the Public Works engineer on the levee easement question and hope to catch up with him today. Carol »> "Jessica Bradley" <iessicaftcraftarchitects.com> 01/16/2008 10:50 am »> Carol: To follow -up our conversation and the letter from the Muckleshoot Preservation Program, below find our thoughts on the CV Operations site having a high probability for archaeological discovery. We understand that the City of Tukwila concurs with the Muckleshoot Preservation Program's request to: 1. Provide an archaeological field study by a professional archeologist. 2. Provide an action plan in the event artifacts are uncovered during construction. We understand that you have done some preliminary research and have not found any existing studies published on this site. We propose the following action: 1. Forgo the archaeological field study for the following reasons: o The site has already been disturbed first to build the river levee, second to construct the adjacent building and third to install existing utilities along 180th. o Due to the site geography (man -made levee), the depth of possible archaeological artifacts, if any, would exceed the depth excavation. (The structural solution is slab on grade with spread footings. The footing depth is 1' -6 ". We anticipate the depth of excavation to be 3' -0 ".) 2. Move forward with the action plan. This request is readily Page 1 l' Carol Lumb - Re: WF: CV Operations - c haeologicaI significance achievable - we have developed and implemented archaeological action plans on other projects. We have made contact with Scott Williams (state archaeologist) and Charlie Sundberg (a preservation planner) - both gentlemen we have worked with on a previous site with archaeological potential. In hopes that they can share with us some information on the site - known findings, etc.. We will see how it goes .. . Jessica Bradley Project Manager Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 p: 206.720.7001 f: 206.720.2949 www. crafta rch i tects. co m Page 2 January 15, 2008 Dear Karen: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Ms. Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 39015 172 Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 • RE: December 21, 2007 Comments on Wells Fargo Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Thank you for the additional comments you provided on the shoreline substantial development permit that was issued on the Wells Fargo development proposed on the south side of S. 180 Street and Sperry Drive. I wanted to address briefly your comments which are copied below; the City's response follows after your comment. -1. The location and size of the proposed parking area and new building within the shoreline management zone could permanently preclude the actions needed to repair the levee in the project vicinity that failed in the 2006 storms such that the levee repair is the least environmentally damaging approach and actually restores river and riparian functions for the Green River. We have experienced several levee repair projects where "partial" restorative actions occurred because of existing infrastructure that could not be moved or modified. Response: We have no regulatory authority to prohibit development on this site; we will obtain additional easement area for setting back the levee at a future time, under the authority granted in TMC 16.52.100 C. At the time funding is available to set the levee back, we will address the redistribution of parking for the site. The project was re- designed to move the location of the underground storm water vault out of the future levee set back area to avoid conflicts in the future. 2. Please note that there are listed salmonid species in the project area including chinook, steelhead and coho (a species of concern). There may also be foraging CL Q: \Wells Fargo \Walters.doc Page 1 of 2 01/15/2008 5:37:00 PM A2111 411111 - T.• 01 0 o nL____ nnx . -. • .,.. Jim Haggerton, Mayor Ms. Karen Walters • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe January 15, 2008 Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner bull trout in the area too. Again, the concern is that this project will limit opportunities to restore habitat for these and other salmonids species. Response: comment noted. 3. The planting plan is also proposing to plant all non - native tree species (i.e. Swedish Columnar aspen) within 200 feet of the green River. These tree species should be replaced with native trees capable of growing on the soil types at the site. See http : / /dnr.metrokc.gov /wlr/PI /Go- Native /index.aspx for a list of native trees and shrubs that should be used. Response: the Swedish Columnar aspen are no longer being planted; in the area immediately next to the river, all the plant material is native except for the Mahonia Aquifolium `Compacta' — a native species of this shrub will be required. A non - native tree is being used in the parking area that is not immediately adjacent to the river (Ginko Biloba `Autumn Gold'). We will talk with the landscape architect about substituting a native tree that fits the landscape plan's color palette for this portion of the site. 4. The project should maximize water quality treatment on site as much as possible to avoid adding stormwater pollutants to existing stormwater facilities and causing additional pollution loading to the Green River. Response: comment noted. The project will meet the City's adopted storm water regulations. Thank you for your comments. If you have any questions, please let me know. I can be reached at 206 -431 -3661. cc: Minnie Dhaliwal, Acting Planning Supervisor Jessica Bradley, Project Manager, Craft Architects CL Page 2 of 2 01/15/2008 5:37:00 PM Q:\ Wells Fargo\Walters.doc Carol Lumb - WF: CV Operations, Shore ine Staff Report - Corps of Engineers ease nt 1 From: "Jessica Bradley' <jessica @craftarchitects.com> To: "'Carol Lumb"' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 01/15/2008 2:41 pm Subject: WF: CV Operations, Shoreline Staff Report - Corps of Engineers easement CC: <dawestom @wellsfargo.com> Carol: A quick follow -up to our action items from your review. Specifically, the Corps of Engineers easement. Is that a document that the City and /or Corp will draft? Please advise. Best regards, Jessica Bradley Project Manager Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 p: 206.720.7001 f: 206.720.2949 na era ✓rL• s 1-1-0 /gy O _p . W� non a r� (ti „2..n ✓ol/ 0 FOR M OF % SIGNEt sre'r L.1 ►w-c , c c s44- 4-? OF � U 0 — 5 (v — 30g FAX PHONE ❑ MOBILE AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION MESSAGE A/4'v 4" ". kn) (pu d1-- \SIGNED FAX PHONE ❑ MOBILE raqn 0 111/1j6 cso tAit env, bit) „ k/ FOR (,,C) r Iii "" DATE 2 TIME P M. M LAG/AA 67,x)0 /kl AV 001.0 0 0 -- ( Z 4 _ (k_ l�'k✓v .1t, 2 '=� PH0 hi' 1 102/3 s MOPS. FORM 4003 DATE TIME P . M. M. ea(- ltaZ S k o v-.A- I-IPA- to et4- _ 4."4.i AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION MESSAGE tVr N^ po AA ,7,,e4 4--- 44) 511 PHONED' RETURNED YOUR CALL PLEASE CALL WILL CALL! AGAIN CAME TO SEE YQU TOPS. FORM 4� O� WANTS TO SEE YOU NED 'RETURNED; YOUR CALL PLEASE CALL WILL CALL AGAIN CAME TO SEE YOU WANTS TO SEE YOU December 24, 2007 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Ave., Suite 408 Dear Ms. Bradley: STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -7600 (360) 407 -6000 • TDD Only (Hearing Impaired) (360) 407 -6006 Re: City of Tukwila Shoreline Substantial Development Permit #L07 -035 WELLS FARGO BANK- Owner /Applicant; Jessica Bradley, Representative Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permit #2007 -NW- 50029 -1 Purpose of this letter: This letter is to inform you that on December 5, 2007, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Tukwila approved your application to construct a 12,983 sq.ft. concrete tilt -up building for paper processing, sorting and storage and 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated employee parking and a stand alone 56 stall overflow parking lot on two adjacent parcels in the Urban shoreline environment of the Green River at 6855 S 180th St. What happens next? The law requires you to wait at least twenty-one (21) days from the date we received this decision from Tukwila before you begin the specific activities authorized by this permit. Therefore, you cannot lawfully begin those activities until December 26, 2007. This waiting period is to allow anyone disagreeing with any aspect of your permit to appeal to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. If anyone does appeal your permit, you must wait until the appeal is over before you start work. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. To be sure the Shorelines Hearings Board has not received an appeal, we advise you to call them at (360) 459 -6327 before you begin work. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at s1an461Ca?ecy.wa.gov or 360 - 407 -0273. Sincergly, ands if P1 er g, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Cc: Carol Lumb, City of Tukwila RECEIVED 'JAN 0 4 2008 COA JNIT' 6EV P�¢ * _,Carol Lumb - RE: Archaeological Site. From: "Kramer, Stephenie (DAHP)" <Stephenie.Kramer @DAHP.WA.GOV> To: "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 01/02/2008 9:05:21 am Subject: RE: Archaeological Site Hi Carol, I have forwarded your email and voicemail to Scott Williams, our local governments archaeologist. (360- 586 -3088) We also don't have parcels here, so if you had township range and section he would be able to locate the information more easily. However, oxbows on the green river commonly have archaeological sites, and there are several in Tukwila, as well as places culturally important to the Tribe, so, I would not be surprised if there is a site there, and a survey prior to site development is very smart in order to avoid an inadvertent discovery and shut -down during construction. We frequently recommend those on riverfront parcels as well. Stephenie Stephenie Kramer Assistant State Archaeologist Washington State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 1063 Capitol Way South Olympia, WA 98504 -8343 voice (360) 586 -3083 fax (360) 586 -3067 stephenie.kramer@dahp.wa.gov www.dahp.wa.gov Original Message From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:54 AM To: Kramer, Stephenie (DAHP) Subject: Archaeological Site Hi Stephenie: You were copied on a letter that the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe sent us requesting an archaeological field study of the sites prior to construction. I wanted to check to see if you have any previous information or surveys that have been prepared for this area that would indicate the presence of archaeological artifacts or human remains. Thanks for any information you can provide. I have a project in Tukwila that involves two parcels on an oxbow of the Green River. The parcel numbers are 362304 -9017 and 362304 -9095. The parcels are owned by Wells Fargo Bank; the western most parcel will be developed with a new building; the eastern parcel will be developed as a parking lot. [Carol Lumb - RE Archaeological Site Carol Lumb Senior Planner Department of Community Development 206 - 431 -3661 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Page 1 of Carol Lumb - Wells Fargo Bank, SSreline Substantial Development perieL07 -035 and L07 -009 (SEPA -DNS) From: "Karen Walter" < Karen .Walter @muckleshoot.nsn.us> To: "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/21/2007 1:07 PM Subject: Wells Fargo Bank, Shoreline Substantial Development permit L07 -035 and L07 -009 (SEPA -DNS) Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Carol, As we discussed via phone on December 13 2007, the outstanding concerns that we have with the above referenced project are as follows: • The project should maximize water quality treatment on site as much as possible to avoid adding stormwater pollutants to existing stormwater facilities and causing additional pollution loading to the Green River. • Please note that there are listed salmonid species in the project area including chinook, steelhead and coho (a species of concern). There may also be foraging bull trout in the area too. Again, the concern is that his project will limit opportunities to restore habitat for these and other salmonids species. Sr 11, AP- 1 j f mil P ly • The planting plan is also proposing to plant all non - native tree species (i.e. SAdish Columnar aspen) within 200 feet of the green River. These tree species should be replaced with native trees capable of growing on the soil types at the site. See http : / /dnr.metrokc.gov /wIr /PI /Go- Native /index.as for a list of native trees and shrubs that should be used. • The location and size of the proposed parking area and new building within the shoreline management zone could permanently preclude the actions needed to repair the levee in the project vicinity that failed in the 2006 storms such that the levee repair is the least environmentally damaging approach and actually restores river and riparian functions for the Green River. We have experienced several levee repair projects where"partial" restorative actions occurred because of existing infrastructure that could not be moved or modified. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \CAROL -L \Local Settings\ Temp\ XPGrpWise \476BBAABtuk- mail630... 12/21/200'; December 19, 2007 Carol Lumb Project Planner Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations Building E07 -009 Dear Ms. Lumb: On behalf of the Preservation Committee, 1 have reviewed the information sent on December 14, 2007 regarding the Wells Fargo CV Operations Building E07 -009 and have the following comments. The Sperry Drive and S. 180th Street property is an area the Tribe has flagged as high potential for archaeological discovery. I understand that there has been a notice of decision issued for this project. We would like to respond to this decision although we, regrettably, received the paperwork late. This project is located close to the Green River which is a high probability area for archaeological finds. Information regarding previous surveys and recorded archaeological sites is available from the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, in Olympia. If the project area has been previously disturbed, we would appreciate documentation that shows that the disturbance extends to the depth of planned construction excavation. From past experience we have learned that areas that show surface disturbance can still contain intact subsurface deposits. If the project area has been previously surveyed, then the following requests can be disregarded. Due to the project's ground disturbing activities and the potential for archaeological discovery, the Preservation Committee is requesting: The Cultural Resources Program does not represent the Wildlife Program and the Fisheries Program which are separate departments under the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Please contact these departments separately for their input on this project. We appreciate the effort to coordinate with the Muckleshoot Tribe prior to site preparation. The destructive nature of construction excavation can often destroy a site and cause delays and unnecessary expense for the contractor. If you have any questions, please contact me at 253- 876 -3272. Thank you for keeping the Tribe informed. • MUCKLESHOOT PRESERVATION PROGRAM 39015 172nd Ave. S.E. • Auburn, WA 98092 Phone: (253) 939 -3311 • FAX: (253) 876 -3312 Laura Murphy, Tribal Archaeologist P CE VED DEC 2 4 2007 OAMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT 1. An archaeological field study of the project APE by a professional archaeologist. 2. An Action Plan in place in the event that human remains or artifacts are uncovered during construction. 3. A copy of the final technical report for our files. CC: Stephenie Kramer, Assistant State Archaeologist, DAHP The Muckleshoot Tribe is a federally recognized Indian Tribe with reserved rights under the Treaty of Point Elliott and the Treaty of Medicine Creek to (among other rights) hunt and gather on all open and unclaimed lands. Carol Lumb - Wells Fargo staff reports From: To: Date: Subject: Laura: I am attaching the staff reports for the proposed new building at S. 180th Street and Sperry Drive. My apologies for not sending these materials to you earlier. I will mail the plan set to you as I do not have these in electronic form. If you have any questions, please give me a call - 206 - 431 -3661. Carol Lumb Senior Planner Carol Lumb Iaura.murphy @muckleshoot.nsn.us 12/06/2007 12:06 pm Wells Fargo staff reports CizofTukwlla Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director NOVEMBER 29, 2007 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank, has filed a design review application to construct a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building and 5,682 square foot covered truck loading area and a stand alone parking lot with 56 stalls all within the shoreline of the Green River. The building site is 1.28 acres and the stand alone parking lot is .80 acres. The building site and stand alone parking lot are located in a small office /industrial park at Sperry Drive and S. 180 Street. The office /industrial park is developed with an aerospace industrial building and two other buildings owned and utilized by Wells Fargo. You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. before the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. The hearing will take place at Tukwila City Hall in the City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. To confirm the time and date of the hearing, please call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5 :00 p.m. Other known required permits include: • Land Altering and Grading • Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application filed: Notice of Completeness Issued: Notice of Application Issued: FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files.are available for review at the City of Tukwila: To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development, located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8 :30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Please call 431 -3670 to make sure the files will be available. May 25, 2007 June 18, 2007 June 25, 2007 CL Page 1 of 1 11/28/2007 9 :57:00 AM q: \Wells Fargo \Public Hearing Notice.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor • Project Description: • City of Tu ila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 19, 2007 To: Jack Pace, Director, Dept. of Community Development Fm: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Re: Project File No. E07 -009: Wells Fargo CV Operations Building and Stand Alone Parking Lot Construct a 12,983 sq. ft. new tilt -up concrete building for sorting and storage of paper products within 200 feet of the Green River. A 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area will be constructed as part of the building of steel and CMU. A parking lot for 56 cars will be constructed on an adjacent parcel for overflow parking to be used by an existing Wells Fargo building that is used for training as well as the other Wells Fargo building and the new building. The sites are located at a bend in the Green River which surrounds the sites on the south and east sides (see aerial photo, page three). A U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Section 205 levee runs along the riverward side of the sites. Proponent: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Location: Sperry Drive and S. 180 Street Date prepared: July 31, 2007 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development CL Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc MEMORANDUM • Page 1 of 8 11/15/2007 4:03:00 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor ti7nn Snnthrontor Rnrrlovarrl brito limn • Tukwila Wachinatnn O14114R a Phnnv• MA-421-7A711 e P,v- 71)A.d11 -7i'AS SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) Existing Environmental Information: • Geotechnical Report dated April 17, 2007 prepared by Geo Engineers, Inc. • Technical Information Report, dated July 21, 2007; revised November 8, 2007 prepared by Barghausen Engineering. Comments on SEPA Checklist: Page 5, #5b. The Puget Sound Chinook salmon has been listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service as a threatened species. This species is found in the Green River which borders the development sites on the south and east. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth • • The site is generally flat, with the maximum slope 2% outside of the levee. Two soil borings were taken on the site. The geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers identified alluvial soil deposits: the sod at the surface was underlain by silty sand in a loose to very loose moist condition that extends to about 6.5 feet below ground surface. Below this layer are interbedded layers of very soft or loose silt, sandy silt, silty sand and organic silt with peat inclusions to a depth of 26.5 feet. Below this layer is a layer of sand with silt that ranges from loose to medium dense. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 10 feet below ground surface on the first boring and 8 feet in the second boring. Groundwater depths vary seasonally, with levels being generally higher in the winter and spring months. The Report recommends the site be pre - loaded for at least one month and surcharged to reduce the potential for unacceptable post - construction settlement. CL Page 2 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 Approximately 500 cubic yards will excavated on -site and 2,500 cubic yards of imported fill will be placed on site for the pre- loading. Approximately 700 cubic yards of stripped soil will be hauled off -site. A rock construction entrance and silt fencing will be used to reduce run -off of sediment during construction. Post construction, landscaping and the installed surface water control will provide erosion control. Air Water During construction small quantities of vehicle emissions, paint odors and dust will occur during grading. After the project is complete, typical quantities of vehicle emissions from on -site traffic can be expected The subject parcels are located in a horseshoe bend of the Green River, which abuts the building site on the south and the parking area on the east. The project is subject to the State Shoreline Management Act as the site development takes place within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction. A small portion of the landscape area falls within the River Environment with the parking area and a portion of the new building falling within the Low Impact and High Impact shoreline environments. The new parking lot falls within the Low and High Impact shoreline environments. CL Page 3 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 The project site does not lie within a 100 -year flood plain as it lies behind a U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (COE) levee that was recently re- certified. The COE has identified a section of the riverbank just upstream from this site as having been damaged in the winter storms of 2006 and in need of immediate repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the COE to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. The width of the current levee easement does not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies the applicant has been requested to provide additional easement area to allow the levee to be set back at a maximum slope of 2.5 to 1. The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and to grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila (TMC 16.52.100 C.). Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require that the property owner grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If the additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The requested easement width is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The property owner has agreed to provide the additional easement area. This will permit achieving a 2.5:1 side slope of the levee and the inclusion of a bench at the base of the levee that will be planted with native vegetation to improve the habitat along the river. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water, nor will there be any surface water or ground water withdrawals or diversions. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters will occur. The building will be connected to the City of Tukwila's sewage system. Runoff from the parking areas and building roof will be collected onsite in an underground detention and water quality vault prior to discharge to City storm water line in S. 180 Street. The storm water line flows to the P -17 storm water pond to the north. Plants • • Both the site for the new building and the site for the new parking area are covered with grass. One cottonwood tree, approximately 36 feet tall, exists on the parcel that will be developed with the parking lot. This tree falls outside the shoreline area. No other trees or vegetation exists on the parcels to be developed. Formal landscaping CL Page 4 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo1E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 will be provided at the new building site and in the parking lot, as required by the Zoning Code. Native and drought tolerant plantings will be used throughout the site. Animals • • The SEPA Checklist does not note any animals that have been observed on or near the site nor the presence of any threatened or endangered species on or near the site. Given the location of the site in an oxbow of the Green River, it is reasonable to assume that songbirds, ducks, crows and Canadian geese are probably located on or near the site. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway migration route. The only mammals observed on the site have been rodents. The National Marine Fisheries Service has listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. This species is known to inhabit the Green River. Energy/Natural Resources Electricity and natural gas will be used in the building for heating and other uses normal for office uses. Diesel fuel will be used to supply power to the backup generator and in the construction equipment during construction. The project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. The building will be designed and constructed to meet the Washington State Energy. Environmental Health No environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waster will be generated by the proposed uses on the parcels. Special emergency services required as a result of the proposed project are fire, ambulance and police. Site safety design techniques will be used including signage for traffic circulation, pedestrian walkways and site lighting to minimize environmental health hazards. Noise is generated by traffic along S. 180 Street and Sperry Way South street in front of the site and to the east. Construction noise will occur during regular hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. Noise will be generated from vehicles and trucks once the building is open for business. Land/Shoreline Uses Both of the sites proposed for development are currently vacant although they are located in a small commercial /light industrial park developed with a bank training CL Page 5 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 facility, a processing center also owned by Wells Fargo and a manufacturing operation related to the aerospace industry. As noted earlier, the sites are located in an oxbow of the Green River, with the river on the south side of one parcel and the east side of the other. The site is designated Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned TUC. The proposed use is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban and the proposal must obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development permit. Approximately 20 people will work in the new building initially when construction is completed. Ultimately, up to 30 -35 people may work in the facility at maximum capacity. Housing No housing exists on the site. Aesthetics • • The type of construction proposed for the building is tilt up concrete. The project is subject to design review and will be considered by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. There are no buildings located in the River or Low Impact Environment of the shoreline. The truck delivery area, which is 22 feet in height, falls within the High Impact shoreline environment. Light/Glare The building and parking area will have exterior security lighting. The light fixtures will be shielded to minimize any light trespass off -site. Recreation A pedestrian/bike trail system exists on the top of the levee which contains the Green River. Sidewalk already exists along S. 180 Street; a sidewalk will be constructed along the east side of the new building site to connect the new building with the street CL Page 6 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 Historic /Cultural Preservation There are no places or objects listed on or proposed for national state or local preservation registers on the two sites to be developed. Transportation Both sites will be accessed via Sperry Drive, a private road which connects to S. 180 Street at a signalized intersection. A transit stop is located at the northeast corner of the parcel to be developed with the building. This site will include 24 new parking stalls. The other parcel , Parcel B, will be developed with 54 parking stalls, to be used by the bank training facility. Traffic concurrency fees and traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at the time of building permit issuance. Public Services The development of this site as a warehouse /office building will generate an increased need for public services such as police and fire. Utilities • • Utilities currently available at the site include electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, storm water and sanitary sewer. No additional utilities are anticipated to be needed as a result of the building construction. Public Comments Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the public comment period. The Tribe had the following questions about the project. The questions are in italics with the staff/applicant response following. 1. Where does the storm system that will receive stormwater from this project drain to? The checklist is incomplete. Response: The stormwater will be detained in a water quality vault and then be discharged to a City of Tukwila storm water system in S. 180 Street which then discharges to the P -17 pond, which lies just to the northeast of Costco. 2. How large is the deciduous tree that will be removed? What species of tree is it? How close to the Green River is this tree? Response: The deciduous tree to be removed is a cottonwood, is approximately 385 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark. This area falls outside of the CL Page 7 of 8 1 1/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 shoreline environment and is therefore exempt from the City's Tree Ordinance (TMC 18.54) which requires replacement of trees removed from sensitive areas. 3. Will the project include any low impact development techniques as described in the Low Impact Development guidelines (http: / /www.psat.wa.gov /Publications /LID tech manual05 /lid index.htm; additional information is available at the Puget Sound Action Team's website)? If not, why not? Response: The City's stormwater code encourages the use of LID development but does not require its use. The revised landscape plan, sheet L -1, uses a fifteen (15) foot wide landscape area along the south side of the stand alone parking area for additional water quality as a bio- filtration swale, also to disperse the runoff to minimize the impact to the downstream system. 4. What is the purpose of the "meandering dry creek bed with boulders that will be added along the NE corner of Parcel E? Is this feature needed? Would it be possible to replace this feature with planting trees along the areas of the Green River that are within 200 feet of the project areas to create shade and a source of organic materials for the Green River. Response: The dry creek bed is a landscaping feature provided to comply with the City's front yard landscaping requirements. This feature includes landscape material as well as the rocks that comprise the creek bed. The COE does not permit trees to be planted on certified levees due to concern about destabilization. The applicant is granting additional easement area to the City and the King County Levee District to permit the setting back of the levee at a future date. This will permit creation of a bench that can be planted to provide vegetation to improve the river habitat. 5. Please note that applicant's project consistency narrative is in error. There is ESA listed chinook that utilizes this portion of the Green River. In addition, there are steelhead trout and coho, both of which are proposed for listing that also utilize this portion of the Green River. Response: Comment noted. The staff report acknowledges the presence of threatened species in the Green River adjacent to the proposed development site and the file copy of the Checklist has noted this correction. Recommendation Determination of Nonsignificance • CL Page 8 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc Project: W ups 6v30 G� O Pe vc c 'f, Address: Date transmitted: it r .14-Q1 Response requested by: 1 t - 2.L/ -01 Staff coordinator: A Date response received: RE J VED City of Tukwila 2007 Department of Community Developm TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ Planning `VI Public Works ❑ Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec oatic f,/t 4tJ .4,0 1 nW,01 .tek P WO. Sc. PA CO4 1 0 1 n r. -- 1 1( —(6 W "tV ` IPM ` 1IL0 agl/ ÷0 fin, o 4r . S P ,, A- /�.ip,Qoa t r/ Snx-n". ok (kw) , e L 4& ' i .1 � 'r' ✓ 13 l9R�v yam, i � re-e.. ot 4.0 elk ❑ DRC review requested COMMENTS ❑ Plan submittal requested <4 14 ti ,„9-0 cepts;die-,xed A re s &Li 7 rrie o s 18O &S Gtov File Number E 01 -oo L✓omil- 035 st . 1� - 1 031 - bCZ. 0 Plan approved Plan check date: 4/3/o-7 Comments prepared by: C1 0/ 0- -t- C2:ol Lurr�b - RE: Wells Fargo Project iikus From: Carol Lumb To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Date: 10/12/2007 5:28 pm Subject: RE: Wells Fargo Project Status Hi Jessica: Great news that work on the Wells Fargo project is proceeding. November 1 or 5 works for me, so just let me know which date you want to meet and I'll find a conference room for us. If you will have questions that involve the levee, please let me know so I can make sure Ryan Larson is available to attend the meeting as well. I don't know what his schedule is like for 11 /1 or 11/5. As far as getting us the drawings by November 27th, I am assuming you are referring to the drawings that would go in the Planning Commission packet - and 11/27 is fine. I am also assuming that we will have seen a revised submittal from you well before 11/27, so that staff reports can be written, SEPA can be issued and the shoreline substantial development permit issued prior to the Planning Commission hearing. A submittal from you would include a response to the questions /comments /concerns outlined in my letter and copies of the plan set that reflect any changes to the site plan, building design etc. You would need to provide 4 sets of the plans with the resubmittal so I can circulate them to the other reviewing departments (Public Works and Fire). Now, about the timing of the hearing. There are several land use decisions that need to be made prior to the public hearing. We need to issue our SEPA determination at least 14 days prior to the public hearing (there is a 14 day appeal period, so we want to make sure no one is going to appeal the SEPA decision before we have the public hearing). So, backing up from the December 13 public hearing, we will need to issue SEPA at the latest by November 28th. The shoreline substantial development permit can't be issued until we know there is no appeal of SEPA, so we would need to be ready to issue that permit the day before the public hearing, or December 12, so this moves the issuance of SEPA to 11/27 so we know on 12/13 whether an appeal has been filed. I don't know if this has thoroughly confused you, but the timing will be tight for a 12/13 public hearing if we aren't meeting to discuss issues until the beginning of November. Would you be able to meet earlier? I am out of the office most of next week - I will be in Tuesday and 1/2 of Wednesday. Let's try to talk Tuesday morning about the scheduling of the meeting to go over issues. Thanks. Carol »> "Jessica Bradley" <iessica@ craftarchitects.com> 10/12/2007 4:12 pm »> Carol: I'm happy to announce we are making progress! Wells Fargo has approved the budget for the project and the team is back doing work. We are targeting the December 13th hearing date. (Which means we will send drawings to you on November 27th - please confirm that this gives you enough time.) We would also like to schedule a meeting with you to discuss our solutions, perhaps Thursday Nov 1st? Or Monday the 5th? We would like to bring our Wells Fargo project manager, landscape architect and civil engineer to this meeting. We may also bring our security consultant. Please reply with your thoughts, Best regards, Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb fmailto:clumbPci.tukwila.wa.usl Page 1 R Lum�b - RE: Wells Fargo Projecttus Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:20 PM To: iessica @craftarchitects.com Subject: RE: Project Status Hi Jessica: Thanks for the update. If it will be 4 -6 weeks before you have any solutions, it may be that the October hearing date will be missed. Our hearing dates in November and December are earlier due to the holidays - November 8 and December 13. If you think the project will be headed for a new hearing date, let me know as soon as possible so I can reserve a spot for the project. Hope the rest of your week (brief as it is) goes well. It has been a bit nuts over here.- so I am looking forward to the weekend. Carol »> "Jessica Bradley" <iessica@craftarchitects.com> 09/06/2007 5:01 »> Carol: Wow - you are so proactive. Unfortunately, things are moving at a snails pace. Corporate red tape has taken over and the project is on hold. We are scheduled to meet with the civil and landscaping teams on the 12th to brainstorm solutions. I expect it will be another 4 to 6 weeks before we have any real solutions to share with you. If things change, I will let you know. Best regards, Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb fmailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us} Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:50 PM To: jessica@craftarchitects.com Subject: Project Status Hi Jessica: I'm checking in on how things are going with the Wells Fargo project on S. 180th Street. I have the SEPA staff report pretty much complete and I was hoping to see what revisions might be proposed in the site lay out and any other project revisions that might need to be reflected in the SEPA staff report before giving it to my supervisor. I am just starting to work on the shoreline staff report, but I will need to know responses to some of design review and the Public Works comment regarding the need for additional levee easement area to reflect these in the staff pm Carol Lun�b - RE: Wells Fargo Project tus report as well. I would appreciate it if you could let me know when you think you will be submitting revised plans for the project so I can schedule review time with other staff. Thanks very much. Carol Page Carol Lumb - RE: Project Status • From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Jessica: Carol Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 09/24/2007 10:25:39 am RE: Project Status I checked with Ryan Larson, Public Works surface water engineer, on your question regarding the timing of the Army Corps of Engineers work to repair the levee in the vicinity of the proposed Wells Fargo processing facility. Ryan says that currently the Corps plans to start actual construction in July, 2008. Approximately 3 months prior to the start of construction, all easements would need to be certified by the COE. Let me know if you have other questions. Just FYI - I will be out of the office 9/26 through 10/5, back in the office 10/8. Thanks. »> "Jessica Bradley" <iessica @craftarchitects.com> 09/14/2007 3:07:05 pm »> Carol: One of the big questions that keeps coming up in our discussions is the timing of the ACE levee repair work. Is there anyway to estimate WHEN the repair work might begin? How long it will take? Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb f mailto:clumb@ci.tukwila.wa.usl Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:50 PM To: jessica@craftarchitects.com Subject: Project Status Hi Jessica: I'm checking in on how things are going with the Wells Fargo project on S. 180th Street. I have the SEPA staff report pretty much complete and I was hoping to see what revisions might be proposed in the site lay out and any other project revisions that might need to be reflected in the SEPA staff report before giving it to my supervisor. I am just starting to work on the shoreline staff report, but I will need to know responses to some of design review and the Public Works comment regarding the need for additional levee easement area to reflect these in the staff report as well. I would appreciate it if you could let me know when you think you will be submitting revised plans for the project so I can schedule review time with other staff. Thanks very much. Carol Carol Lumb - Fwd: RE: Project • r" From: Ryan Larson To: Carol Lumb Date: 09/20/2007 11:29 AM Subject: Fwd: RE: Project Status Carol, Page 1 of 1 The Corps of Engineer's tentative schedule is to start actual construction in July of 08'. Approximately 3 months prior to this date, all easements would need to be certified by the COE. - Ryan »> Carol Lumb 09/14/2007 3:46 pm »> Hi Ryan: I'm forwarding an e-mail I sent to the Wells Fargo architect about the building site at Sperry and Andover Park East. Do you have any detailed information about when the levee repair will take place? thanks. Carol file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \CAROL -L \Local Settings\ Temp\ XPGrpWise \46F25980tuk- mail6300 -... 09/24/2007 { Carol Lumb - RE: Project Status ID From: To: Date: Subject: Jessica: Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 09/14/2007 3:43 pm RE: Project Status Thank you for your voice mail message this afternoon with the schedule up date. I will take the Wells Fargo project off the October Planning Commission agenda. I have not been given a date by Public Works staff for when the levee repairs will take place - I will forward your e-mail to Ryan Larson who is the senior storm water engineer for the Public Works Department to see if he has more information. Just for your reference, his telephone number is 431 -2456. I can also invite him to attend our meeting whenever that is set up if you would like, although it sounds like that may be a ways off. If you want to set up a meeting with him sooner, I would be happy to help with that. I'll get back to you as soon as I hear back from Ryan. I am out of the office on Monday, but in the rest of the week. Carol »> "Jessica Bradley' <jessicaPcraftarchitects.com> 09/14/2007 3:07 pm »> Carol: One of the big questions that keeps coming up in our discussions is the timing of the ACE levee repair work. Is there anyway to estimate WHEN the repair work might begin? How long it will take? Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb fmailto :clumbci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:50 PM To: iessicaPcraftarchitects.com Subject: Project Status Hi Jessica: I'm checking in on how things are going with the Wells Fargo project on S. 180th Street. I have the SEPA staff report pretty much complete and I was hoping to see what revisions might be proposed in the site lay out and any other project revisions that might need to be reflected in the SEPA staff report before giving it to my supervisor. I am just starting to work on the shoreline staff report, but I will need to know responses to some of design review and the Public Works comment regarding the need for additional levee easement area to reflect these in the staff report as well. I would appreciate it if you could let me know when you think you will be submitting revised plans for the project so I can schedule review time with other staff. Thanks very much. Carol Carol Lumb -`WF CV Ope ratio ns co t From: "Jessica Bradley" <jessica @craftarchitects.com> To: "'Carol Lumb "' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 08/06/2007 8:47 am Subject: WF CV Operations comments CC: <kathy @craftarchitects.com >, <dawestom @wellsfar... Carol: Good morning. We had a long meeting with Wells Fargo, the end of last week. Based on the quantity and type of comments that we received, we would like to proceed slowly to address them. Instead of targeting the September design review date, we would prefer the October 25th meeting. You mentioned needing to receive documents at least 2 weeks prior to the meeting (October 9th). Our goal is to get the documents to you ahead of the October 9th date so we have time to come to agreement on the solutions ( +/- October 1). Please reply with questions or concerns. Best regards, Jessica Bradley Project Manager Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Ave., Suite 408 Seattle, WA. 98101 p.206.720.7001 f.206.720.2949 www.craftarchitects.com Carol Lumb - WF CV Operations com From: To: Date: Subject: CC: Carol: You suggested that if we could answer question #1, you could make progress with the SEPA application. The answer is: Yes, the new parking area on Parcel B is to provide additional parking for the adjacent existing building on parcel A. (Wells calls this the Sperry building) Not parking for parcels D or E. Best regards, Jessica Bradley Project Manager Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Ave., Suite 408 Seattle, WA. 98101 p.206.720.7001 f.206.720.2949 www.craftarchitects.com answer to question #1 (SEPA review) "Jessica Bradley" <jessica @craftarchitects.com> "'Carol Lumb "' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> 08/06/2007 8:52 am WF CV Operations comments - answer to question #1 (SEPA review) <kathy @crafta rch itects. com> July 31, 2007 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations Land Use Applications Dear Jessica: This letter is a follow -up to my letter dated July 30, 2007 which provides technical comments on the Wells Fargo project. As I said in my e-mail to you yesterday, when I reviewed the July 30 letter, I noticed I had left out two items, which are as follows: 1. I don't find a plan sheet that identifies the location of the different light fixtures, lighting for the new parking area serving the new building and lighting for the new parking area on Parcel B. Please provide this information. 2. When you apply for the building permit, the materials must include plans that show street lights on S. 180 Street. I apologize for the omission of these items in the original letter. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner i Cizj' of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Joanna Spencer, Public Works Development Engineer Steven M. Mullet, Mayor CL Page 1 of 1 07/31/2007 9:52:00 AM QI`W r___ \Too ' ri•ld e - e - re3 des 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 July 30, 2007 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations Land Use Applications Dear Jessica: • Staff has reviewed the proposed new building and new stand alone parking lot on the Wells Fargo site and has the comments that follow below. In addition, comments /questions were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the public comment period. I forwarded those comments via e-mail to you on July 26, 2007, but will include a copy with this letter. Please provide a response to the Muckleshoot comments as well as to the City's. E07 - 008: Environmental Review 1. For the new parking area located on Parcel B, is this parking to provide additional parking for the training building on the north? L07 - 037: Design Review Building Design: 1. The site plan does not identify the number of parking stalls required for the new building or the number of stalls that are required for the existing building and whether any parking stalls are being lost due to the new building. Please provide these calculations on the site plan or other appropriate plan sheet. 2. We understand the need for security for the proposed building — however, it is not acceptable to present a completely solid wall facing S. 180 Street. The building design along S. 180` Street must appear less warehouse -like, with a front facade that mimics a front even though there is no public access. Currently, the design of the north side lacks a consistent design theme, with the CMU randomly placed along the wall. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor CL Page 1 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Qiry` "e ra C•rvrvo-'r ii_ d° 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 • • The Shane Company, located at the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and S. 180 Street had security concerns but provided a facade that faces the street on two sides that adds visual interest and has a retail feel even though no windows are provided. The building located on the southwest corner of Andover Park West and 180 Street also had security concerns but was able to incorporate false windows (and even false building entrances) to the facade to provide a street presence. I have enclosed some photos of both these buildings for your review. 3. Will the doors to the outside have awnings that match those of the existing building? 4. Is there any ventilation or other equipment located on the ground other than the generator? If so, please identify on the site plan. Landscaping: Please see the enclosed landscaping sheet with comments and questions to supplement the comments below. 5. Please provide a column in the Plant Schedule Key that identifies the number of plants that will be planted for each species. 6. The Plant Schedule Key uses two different symbols for the same tree - Ginkgo Biloba `Princeton Sentry' — is there something that distinguishes one from the other? 7. The plans are missing an irrigation sheet. 8. The Landscape Code requires shrubs to be a minimum of 18 inches in height at planting — it appears from the Plant Schedule that the shrubs will be 21 inches in spread - does this correlate with our code requirement? 9. The Swedish Columnar Aspen do not match other trees planted along S. 180 Street. Please substitute Red Maples, Tulip Tree, English Oak, or Accolade Elm, which provide more shade potential as well. 10. Will the proposed spacing of groundcover at 30 inches on center provide 90% coverage within 3 years? 11. It is not clear from the landscaping plan whether groundcover is provided throughout the site. The Landscaping Code requires groundcover that will cover 90% of the site within 3 years. It needs to be clear to the landscape contractor where groundcover is being planted and what type so that enough ground cover is ordered. Either provide a note in the planting key or a separate landscape plan that just identifies groundcover location and the type. 12. Please confirm that shrubs are being planted along the shoreline — the symbol in that area does not match the Plant Key for Dwarf Redtwig Dogwood (which needs to be substituted as it is not a native species). If a continuous evergreen hedge is used, then groundcover would not be required. 13. Native plantings are required in the 200 foot shoreline area. Please indicate the shoreline environments on the landscape plan assist in identifying which areas will require native plantings. Native strawberry will do well both in the sun and the shade, unlike the Kinnikinnick, which will be shaded out by the mature landscaping eventually. CL Page 2 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q:\Wells FargoVrechnical Comments Ltr.doc Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 • • 14. The stand alone parking area on parcel B must include the full range of Type 2 landscaping (trees, shrubs, groundcover), not just landscaping for the parking bulbs. Please provide a pedestrian connection between this parking area and the front door of the training building. This is also an area that provides an opportunity for the use of low impact development techniques. 15. Please a pedestrian connection from the stand alone parking area on parcel B to the shoreline trail that abuts on the east. 16. Why are shrubs being removed from the existing landscaping along the river? This is mature plant material that appears to be in good condition. Shrubs are part of required landscaping — if we approve their removal, new shrubs must be planted along with groundcover. 17. Please identify on the landscaping plan the location of the new fencing and how it will connect with the existing fencing. It is not clear if the fencing starts at the western edge of the new building or runs in front of it — please clarify. 18. Wood slats must be used with the chain link fencing unless the landscaping will form a fairly solid screen. 19. It is awkward to jog the proposed new fencing out to join the existing fencing along the trail. Since work is proposed in the existing landscaping area '(removal of shrubs) this is an opportunity to move the existing fence to the correct location — inside the landscape area rather than outside. 20. For security purposes, would it be better to plant the Barberis shrubs along the fence on the northwest side of the site? 21. There is a wedge- shaped area south of the new shoreline planting area adjacent to the asphalt trail that is labeled "River Protection Easement" (identified on enclosed Landscape Plan) that is not proposed for landscaping. It appears this area is part of the Wells Fargo property and should be included in the shoreline planting area? 22. The parking bulbs are required to be planted with one tree and a combination of groundcover and shrubs and mulch. Some parking bulbs show only a tree and groundcover. 23. For the dry river bed area, can you provide a photo (electronic) of how this area will look (for inclusion in the staff report) or suggest other sites where this technique has been used close by that we could view? Public Works Comments: 24. The frontal improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalk on S. 180 Street must be continued along the east side of the site. 25. The Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the section of riverbank upstream of S. 180 along the Tukwila 205 levee and identified a section that is damaged and in immediate need of repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. Existing easements do not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies, additional easement will be required from the property owner to allow levee side slopes to be a maximum of 2.5 to 1. CL Page 3 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 • • The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila. Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require the property owner to grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The Easement width we are requesting is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. 26. The proposed storm water vault should be moved as far from the river as practical so that it will not be affected by any future levee setback work. You may also want to consider moving the new building eastward, to accommodate the additional easement area. The following comments are for your information when applying for the building permit for the project: 1. A separate Public Works permit will be required for the site pre -load. 2. A Traffic Concurrency Test Application (copy enclosed) is required. This Application is separate from the Traffic Mitigation fees to be paid prior to issuance of the building permit; 3. The current submittal does not address cross - connection issues. When submitting the building permit materials, please show the RPPA for domestic water and DDCUA in a vault for fire prevention on the plans. 4. The new building will be required to be sprinklered. 5. Maintain the existing hydrants and keep a 4 foot clear space around the existing hydrants. 6. Additional hydrants may be needed, per TMC 14.24.040. The parcel on which the stand alone parking is proposed must be consolidated with the parcel with the training facility. I am enclosing the application for the lot consolidation. Processing of this application will not affect the timing of the design review or shoreline permit applications. The design review application is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing at the August 23, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. To retain this hearing date, I will need to receive a response to the above items, the comments submitted by the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and 4 sets of revised plans by Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. I realize this is a very short turn around time, but public hearing notices must be mailed August 8, 2007 - 14 days prior to the hearing date. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to meet to discuss any of the above items. My schedule is open through Thursday. Ryan Larson, the Public Works CL Page 4 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 engineer who provided comments on the levee is on vacation until Monday, August 6, 2007, in the event you want to schedule a meeting with him. I can be reached at 206- 431 -3661. Sincerely, tau-( ✓6141, Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosures • • cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Joanna Spencer, Pubic Works Development Engineer Ryan Larson, Public Works Senior Engineer, Surface Water CL Page 5 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Carol Lumb - Fwd: Wells Fargo option- E07 -009, L07 -035, and L07 -037 Noti of Application From: To: Date: Subject: Application Hi Jessica: Carol Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 07/26/2007 11:13 am Fwd: Wells Fargo - CV operation- E07 -009, L07 -035, and L07 -037 Notice of I am forwarding the only outside comments I received on the Wells Fargo project - these are from Karen Walter, who is with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries program. I am working on a technical comments letter that will consolidate comments I have received from Public Works, our Urban Environmentalist and me. I hope to have this completed by tomorrow or Monday at the latest. In terms of the in -house comments I've received, the major one is from Public Works regarding the need for obtaining from the property owner additional easement area along the levee to allow the levee side slopes to be a maximum of 2.5 to 1. I believe Public Works also brought this issue up at the Pre - Application meeting that was held on this project. There is no need to respond to the Muckleshoot comments separate from my technical comments letter. I will include their comment e-mail with my letter - I just wanted to pass them along so you had an opportunity to review them ahead of time. Let me know if you have any questions. Page 1, CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, PLLC has filed applications for development of a 12983 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up building and 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking, and a separate parking lot associated with an existing building to be located at 6855 S. 180th Street, Tukwila, WA. Each building site is bordered by the Green River. Permits applied for include: E07 -009, SEPA environmental review; L07 -035, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and L07 -037, Design Review. Other known required permits include: building permit Studies required with the applications include: Technical Information Report (stormwater) and Geotechnical Report. An environmental checklist has been submitted with the studies identified above. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: E07 -009, L07 -035 and L07 -037 OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Wednesday, July 25, 2007. To receive notification of the final decision on this project, please submit this request to DCD by July 23, 2007 as well. Opportunity for additional oral and written public comments will be provided at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, tentatively scheduled for August 23, 2007 to consider the proposed design of the building (file #L07 -037). To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431 -3670. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The design review application may be appealed to the City Council; the shoreline substantial development permit may be appealed to the State Shoreline Hearing Board. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at (206) 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: May 25, 2007 Notice of Completeness Issued: June 18, 2007 Notice of Application Issued: June 25, 2007 CL Page 1 of 1 06/25/2007 9:23:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \NOA.doc VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE • • • ••. Midland Dr • • 8 li!l'Arriland. ;c N gSegale Pa 1) 24D� t1OPgt iris! a r c h i t e c t s • r7 'ENED GUIYinilLJNiTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATION WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS Tukwila, Washington 0) ' ITE@ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1800- 4243555 COVER SHEET WELLS FARGO CV - OPERATION A PORTION OF THE GOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF SECTION 36 AND GOVERMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST WM • Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing ( s C ) (2 )f ,p,, oc ii a , 4 z. Determination of Non - Significance 1 Mailer's Signature: Tb. g'i47d- Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda , poti ce of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of iU( rn the year 20 P:W DMINISTRATIVEFORMSWORMS \AFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION Project Name: / U Q ,', ( s C ) (2 )f ,p,, oc ii a , 4 z. Project Number: RQ - (-v 001 1„C); 1,01---03-1 1 Mailer's Signature: Tb. g'i47d- Person requesting mailing: CaAey C -1,WL19 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of iU( rn the year 20 P:W DMINISTRATIVEFORMSWORMS \AFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF EN () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMI TION () DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 'TRADE () DEPT OF FISHERIES VVILDUFE ECONOMIC DEV. KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT II 1 () FIRE DISTRICT 12 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DMSION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKIMLA SCHOOL. DISTRICT LIBRARY NTON UBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY () INVEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: PV KS ( ) FIRE POLICE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR O CITY CLERK ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( SW K C CW;AMBER OF COMjaAERCE MUCKLE` SHOOTTINDL RIBE CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDUFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: MDMTNISTRATIVBFORMSICHICLIST .DOC get Nona o G Mplw. •16-. a' obtle we vicAns ahollt, .1- Seal* cicl's' 'WA' or. Plates ( ) U.S. ENVIRONM .N I AL YKU 1 C\. 1 IVIl ~CPRI.T { ) U.S. DEPT H.U.O. () NATIONALRINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. EPT OF ECOLOGY. SHORELAND DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY. SEPA DIVISION* OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CHKUST W/ DETERMINATIONS SITE MAPS WITH DECISION • SEND • SEND SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES MEDIA ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE t f K C. DE' i ENVIR SERVICESSEPA INFO CNTR (.C. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBUC UBRARY ( ) HIGHLLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPEUNE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT 120 () WATER DISTRICT 1125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBUC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT IgftentirTikAkiliG DEPT - ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC () CRY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CRY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PL NO PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES )(OUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMIH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALRION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON MtJ1AU►R N RIM ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CLTUINVILA. A.US.WVVW Oy'5 6SSIC ∎ 'bradlei 32 FIvsi A-0e- Suite - 4 S 0 1 AMC FAMILY LLC PO BOX 2720 PORTLAND, OR 97208 EJT INC PO BOX 25080 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98093 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA, GA 30348 JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY L L 1001 KAMOKILA BLVD KAPOLEI, HI 96707 CASCADE TUKWILA LLC 7900 SE 28TH ST 3400 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 FIRST INTER BNK- KIRKLAND PO BOX 63931 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94163 HIGH BEECH LLC PO BOX 463 REDMOND, WA 98073 LILY POINTE INVESTMENTS 4128 W AMES LAKE DR NE REDMOND, WA 98053 EDWARDS,J MICHAEL 265 CAREFREE WAY FRIDAY HARBOR, WA 98250 GRAY CAT COLLECTIVE LLC 5430 45TH AVE W SEATTLE, WA 98199 HOUGHTON HARBOR LLC 1233 ANDOVER PARK E TUKWILA, WA 98188 NC POWER SYSTEMS CO 17900 W VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA 98188 SFP B LTD PTNRSHP TENANT TENANT OPO BOX 667 1228 ANDOVER PARK E 1230 ANDOVER PARK E PRINEVILLE, OR 97754 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 18123 72ND AVE S 18235 OLYMPIC AVE S 18251 CASCADE AVE S KENT, WA 98032 TUKWILA, WA 98188 SEATTLE, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 18260 OLYMPIC AVE S 6700 RIVERSIDE DR 6750 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 SEATTLE, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 6801 S 180TH ST 6804 S 180TH ST 6810 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 6818 S 180TH ST 6820 S 180TH ST 6835 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TUKWILA TT LLC 6847 S 180TH ST 7100 SW 43RD ST 3300 MAPLE VALLEY HWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98058 Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 1 Ave., Suite 408 Page 1 of 1 Carol Lumb - Wells Fargo- CVeeration- E07 -009, L07 -035, and L07• Notice of Application From: "Karen Walter" < Karen .Walter @muckleshoot.nsn.us> To: "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 07/24/2007 2:52 PM Subject: Wells Fargo- CV operation- E07 -009, L07 -035, and L07 -037 Notice of Application Carol, The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and environmental checklist for the above referenced project. We have some questions. 1. Where does the storm system that will receive stormwater from this project drain to? The checklist is incomplete. 2. How large is the deciduous tree that will be removed? What species of tree is it? How close to the Green River is this tree? 3. Will the project include any low impact development techniques as described in the Low Impact Development guidelines (http: / /www.psat.wa.gov /Publications /LID tech manual05 /lid index.htm; additional information is available at the Puget Sound Action Team's website)? If not, why not? 4. What is the purpose of the "meandering dry creek bed with boulders that will be added along the NE corner of Parcel E? Is this feature needed? Would it be possible to replace this feature with planting trees along the areas of the Green River that are within 200 feet of the project areas to create shade and a source of organic materials for the Green River. 5. Please note that applicant's project consistency narrative is in error. There is ESA listed chinook that utilizes this portion of the Green River. In addition, there are steelhead trout and coho, both of which are proposed for listing that also utilize this portion of the Green River. As you can see, we need additional information before we can provide any technical comments to this project. I look forward to the City's responses. Thank you, Karen Walter Watershed and Land Use Team Leader MITFD 253 - 876 -3116 file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \CAROL -L \Local Settings\ Temp \XPGrpWise \46A6121Etuk -ma... 07/24/2007 Project: WEDS Veu/ 0 3145 i- silvri &L n C. pewl(A Lc r — Address: U)7-S3 S. tYQ` Date transmitted: ti — 1(' —o" 7 Response requested by: S fr i 100 Staff coordinator: 6-641.0 \ Date response received: • TO: Building Planning • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM 'Public Works File Numbers EO'l - 001 LOS _ 035 LO - D31 :�� Fire Dept. _ i Police Dept. Ci Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Oo n BU /LB/N(, W /U.- RE TZ& dvl geD 7Z .SP,eduK14Z- t . l rehN771i4/ IX /5714'6 )1/40z . kkD4f -A/ If4 A/Et `7b E � - Di 67 ,PEatilLE /11E 17 7%e - 7)1 4 ( /Y.2V430 7-ma /Vi zi oyo . y' C L) 2 S PA- cF 4-g o 141) Cx / 7714 rs Pty. Plan check date: 6/21/0q Comments prepared by: 1612_ Update date: Project: WZ'vls -av o 343 1- s7zf'l acne, pewit:A 10 r -- Address: ('?''S s- t80 Date transmitted: & - l (o -o Response requested by: Sol/ 0 , 2 7 Staff coordinator: (-& vo' Date response received: TO: J Building 11 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM ILA Planning a w\P o i P lq v► J a Yee( . -e w■oj -e„ I v - Icy) C t Pc ( j V'60 '4-S QP cJ -L r (. Co Ivy, r G spRo 11.10 �q Plan check date: Public Works :'Fire Dept. Police Dept. IM Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or tuming analyses) may be required of the applicant. LG tA 2 srpft PSG _ COMMENTS 1 f \ (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) I Y o b a c P 1 v' l\ D (cf 0'f S W' cf S o,/ 1 l\-t S 4C),.) G vv.1 s c a r YurrI C �vAUNe ✓`P cPirxn{ - 1-0 re rfri oC/,e_, Update date: S. ,'O4t, — ot I a Comments prepared by: S GT C ‘0 � e Cad wood �� -�� re vvlauec v) (0 rctA-Pc) r / File Numbers Ea - cam LD1 03S' 1_0 - ° re ((1'I `4 u " (reto ,f ? u c s I efti Project: Lwu-s c-av 0 3•►L3 +- S eiz,nz, 0twi C. I,e r Address: Lig55 S. (5 Date transmitted: LP 1 ( O 7 Response requested by: Suiy to i Staff coordinator: L6 J \ Date response received: 1 f TO: -7� Building Planning • City of Tukwila RECEIVECP Department of Community Development JUN 1 8 2007 TUKVviLA PUBLIC WORKS LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) I Ste, 04 1149.4s e2u s e - 7`03/ Z© 07 02 0, 4F e ,62,14.4 j ,n ed&/ fr r ;goad • 1 eot-te,u'red,_ Te,,t 4 4. e x..„6 A, 4, Gin z` I, - &Lae., %,s l , e. / fee `ter /7 fl 049.7‘0,,, 1622. 774-%s is Tra c /f2r'1-re "o ' 1 7 1-0 6�; �c,.o f issue . baUc Rove- o (e€n c File Numbers EOi -)1 LO1- O 35 L.) -03 Public Works .`Fire Dept. r !! Police Dept. a Parks /Rec APO Cj y80/y� /SsCteS 62 ,re hir9Gu e.s1 1 - iatee o4 bne/i/3 /IA_ a- d /Y Are /oleuePar'oo -1 be Ski Plan check date: Comments Update date: o pRs prepared by: j O Joanna Spencer - Proposed Wells Fargo Operation From: Ryan Larson To: Joanna Spencer Date: 07/03/2007 10:28 am Subject: Proposed Wells Fargo -CV Operation CC: Levesque, Andy Joanna, I have reviewed the levee issue for this project with Jim and have the following comments: The Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the section of riverbank upstream of S. 180th along the Tukwila 205 levee and identified a section that is damaged and in immediate need of repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. Existing easements do not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies, additional easement will be required from the property owner to allow levee side slopes to be a maximum of 2.5 to 1. The Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila. Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require the property owner to grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If additional easements can not be secured it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County Standards. The Easement width we are requesting is 125' as measured from the ordinary high water mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The proposed stormwater vault should be moved as far from the river as practical so that it will not be affected by any future levee setback work. - Ryan 1 State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 - 3665 E -mail: tu kp1a nca)ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I 6- At/0 t Lv Mb (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on & — L5 -0 '1 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at S. 1 5 t % See it/t [�✓ so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number l✓ 0 7 -- 00 ( 1 , 401 -O35 Len - 03 7 I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. P: \Planning Forms\ Applications\ SignSpecHandout - June 2006.doc June 19, 2006 6444-t. 66444/1 Applicant or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on Carol Lumb - Public Notice Boards From: Carol Lumb To: Internet:157 @fastsigns.com Date: 06/18/2007 3:36 pm Subject: Public Notice Boards Hi Julie: I would like to request public notice boards for two different projects as follows: Board #1: Project Name: Associated Grocers Access Improvements File Number: L07 -034 Permit Action: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Site is on the NE corner of East Marginal Way S. and Boeing Access Rd. Please post the notice board on East Marginal Way, just before the entrance to the site, which is just north of the intersection of these 2 roads. There is a power pole at the entrance, then a small strip of grass in front of a chain link fence with brown slats - put the sign to the south of the power pole, in the grassing stip between the sidewalk and the slatted fence. Board #2: Project Name: Wells Fargo Building File Number: E07 -009, L07 -035 and L07 -037 Permit Action: Environmental Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Design Review Please post the notice board on the NW corner of Sperry Dr. and S. 180th Street. There is no site address as yet for this project, but the parcel # is 362304 -9095 if you need to see where it is located. Let me know if you have any questions. My telephone number is 206 -431 -3661 or you can e-mail me at clumbt@ci.tukwila.wa. Please let me know as soon as possible when the signs will be posted so I can coordinate the public notice mailing that goes out concurrent with the sign posting. Thanks very much. Carol Lumb June 18, 2007 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Ms. Bradley: • Cizy of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M. Mullet, Mayor RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations, File Nos. E07 -009 (SEPA), L07 -035 (Shoreline) and L07 -037 (Design Review) Your shoreline substantial development permit and SEPA applications for a new building for Wells Fargo Bank, located at 6855 S. 180 Street, Tukwila have been found to be complete on June 14, 2007 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project has been assigned to me, and tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on Thursday, August 23, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. The Design Review application (L07 -037) was missing the response to the design review criteria. I have faxed these to your office. I don't need the response to these criteria to get the review process going, but these must be submitted as soon as possible to complete the design review application materials and retain the tentative August 23, 2007 public hearing date before the Board of Architectural Review. If the materials are not received within 90 days, the Department may cancel the application due to inactivity. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, . - 0/1A/ 0 wvu/j.- Carol Lumb Senior Planner cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Manager Reviewing Departments CL Page 1 of 1 06/16/2007 2:34:00 PM 6300 Sou Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 • • STATE OF WASHINGTON Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 - Olympia, Washington 98501 (Mailing Address) PO Box 48343 - Olympia, Washington 98504 -8343 (360) 586 -3065 Fax Number (360) 586 -3067 ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS This list is distributed for the convenience of those who might need the services of an archaeological consultant. Please note that DAHP serves in a referral capacity only and does not guarantee or recommend the work of any of these consultants, nor is this listing to be construed as any guarantee of the quality of work. All of the listed organizations have on their staff, and often hire on a part-time basis, persons determined to meet qualification standards for cultural resource management professionals. These standards (promulgated by the National Park Service and published in 36 CFR Part 61) define minimum education and experience required to perform identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment activities for historic properties. In some cases, additional areas or levels of expertise may be needed, depending on the complexity of the task and the nature of the properties involved. Project costs may vary considerably between companies, and it is recommended that more than one estimate be obtained. It is also recommended that a contract containing language that specifies that a report meeting the minimal reporting standards of DAHP will be provided as a product included in the cost of the project, and that a schedule of project completion (including any fieldwork, laboratory analysis, and report production) also be included in the contract. Historic preservation consulting is a professional business, and it is recommended that you take the same care selecting a consultant as you would any contractor. BALDWIN, GARTH L. DRAYTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH 7115 191 AVE SW ROCHESTER, WA 98579 (360) 739 -2443 qarth@dravtonarchaeology.com www.draytonarchaeoloov.com BARD, DR JAMES CH2MHILL 2300 NW WALNUT BLVD CORVALLIS OR 97339 (541) 752 -0235 x3662 jbard(a�ch2m.com BLUKIS ONAT, DR ASTRIDA R BOAS INCORPORATED 2001 EAST LYNN ST SEATTLE WA 98112 (206) 323 -1343 FAX (206) 328 -7578 boasinc @comcast.net BOWDEN, BRADLEY S. HISTORICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 909 NORTH BEECH STREET, SUITE 215 PORTLAND, OR 97227 (503) 247 -1319 FAX (503) 284 -1161 bbowden@hrassoc.com www.hrassoc.com BURNEY, MICHAEL S. BURNEY & ASSOCIATES PO BOX 2329 TAOS NM 87571 -2329 (505) 737 -9497 FAX (505) 737 -9498 michaelburney @hotmail.com BUSH, KELLY R EQUINOX RESEARCH & CONSULTING 41507 SOUTH SKAGIT HIGHWAY CONCRETE WA 98237 (360) 826 -4930 FAX (360) 826 -4830 kelrbush(c�earthlink.net www.equinoerci.com CHURCHILL, TOM ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRONTIERS 951 NE LINDEN AVE GRESHAM OR 97030 (503) 669 -9230 (503) 819 -5600 CELL CLEVELAND, GREG GREG CLEVELAND ARCHAEOLOGIST AND LAND USE HISTORIAN 902 S. 32 AVENUE YAKIMA WA 98902 (509) 453 -1514 (509) 945 -6746 CELL greqcleveland(@charter.net COOK, JACQUELINE CAMAS CONSULTING PO BOX 196 GRAND COULEE WA 99133 (509) 633 -8361 camasAbigdam.net COOK, LAUREN JOHN RPA DMJM HARRIS PLANNING 260 SOUTH BROAD ST, STE 1500 PHILADELPHIA PA 19102 (215) 966 -4868 FAX (215) 735 -0883 Lauren.Cook @dmjmharris.com www.dmjmharris.com COOPER, JASON B JONES & STOKES 11820 NORTHUP WAY SUITE E300 BELLEVUE WA 98005 -1079 (425) 822 -1077 FAX (425) 822 -1079 jcoopertS7i.isanet.com DARBY, MELISSA LOWER COLUMBIA RESEARCH & ARCHAEOLOGY 3327 NE SIMPSON ST PORTLAND OR 97211 TEL /FAX (503) 281 -0204 CELL (503) 407 -7439 mdarby(a,teleport.com DAUGHERTY, DR RICHARD WESTERN HERITAGE 2231 MARINA WAY SE LACEY WA 98503 -3186 (360) 438 -5370 DE DANAAN, DR. LLYN SPECIALISTS IN ETHNOGRAPHY & ETHNOHISTORY SE 142 OYSTER BEACH ROAD KAMILCHE WA 98584 (360) 426 -9631 Idedanaan2Ahotmail.com ETNIER, MICHAEL A., PHD APPLIED OSTEOLOGY 2507 ELM ST BELLINGHAM WA 98225 (360) 738 -8292 www.appliedosteologv.com FAGAN, DR JOHN L ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS NW 2632 SE 162ND AVE PORTLAND OR 97236 (503) 761 -6605 FAX (503) 761 -6620 VANCOUVER, WA 360/696 -7473 ainwAainw.com FEE, JEFFREY PACIFIC CREST HERITAGE SURVEYS 67 JAQUISH OMAK WA 98841 (509) 422 -0586 CELL (509) 322 -0586 plumfarm FLENNIKEN, DR J JEFFREY LITHIC ANALYSTS 659 OLD DALLAS ROAD ROYAL AR 71968 -9661 (501) 767 -1983 CELL (509) 595 -5756 FAX (501) 767 -1983 IithicanalystsAturbonet.com FREED, ROB ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 1515 NW 136 ST VANCOUVER WA 98685 (360) 607 -4407 robarbara @earthlink.net GALL, ALEXANDER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES 2464 NE STAPLETON RD, #3 VANCOUVER WA 98661 (360) 260 -8614 CELL (503) 869 -8067 FAX (360) 260 -0129 asccalex(amsn.com 2 GOUGH, STAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL SERVICES 201 ISLE HALL EASTERN WA UNIVERSITY CHENEY WA 99004 -2420 (509) 359 -2239 FAX (509) 359 -6051 sgough@mail.ewu.edu HARDER, DAVID A PLATEAU INVESTIGATIONS, LLC PO BOX 714 PULLMAN WA 99163 (509) 332 -3830 dharderna,pullman.com HARDING, WILLIAM NORTH WIND ENVIRONMENTAL 545 SHOUP AVE IDAHO FALLS ID 83402 (208) 528 -8718 FAX (208) 528 -8714 whardinqanwindenv.com www.nwindenv.com HARTMANN, GLENN WESTERN SHORE HERITAGE SERVICES 8001 DAY ROAD WEST, SUITE B BAINBRIDGE ISLAND WA 98110 (206) 855 -9020 FAX (206) 855 -9081 info @wshsinc.com HENRICKSON, CELESTE GEOSCIENCES MGMT INSTITUTE INC 1048 MONTEREY AVE BERKELEY CA 94707 (510) 526 -0765 FAX (510) 5276962 www.geomii.com/ celestenicole@hotmail.com HIBBERT, DENNIS GEOARCHAEOLOGY NORTHWEST 1745 NW 63 SEATTLE WA 98107 -2341 (206) 781 -2982 HICKS, BRENT HISTORICAL RESEARCH ASSOC INC 119 PINE ST STE 207 SEATTLE WA 98101 (206) 343 -0226 FAX (206) 343 -0249 thompsonAhrassoc.com www.hrassoc.com HOVEZAK, MARK J. ROSARIO ARCHAEOLOGY 3754 GREENVILLE STREET BELLINGHAM WA 98226 (360) 756 -5207 (field phone) (360) 303 -1998 alabamamark(@msn.com JOHNSON, PAULA PARAGON RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 7352 20TH NW SEATTLE WA 98117 (206) 706 -1659 FAX (206)297 -9630 paula@paracionresearch.net KELLY, MIKE URS CORP 111 SW COLUMBIA SUITE 900 PORTLAND OR 97201 (503) 222 -7200 FAX (503) 222 -4292 LANDREAU, CHRISTOPHER REISS - LANDREAU RESEARCH 1103 S 32 AVE YAKIMA WA 98902 (509) 952 -5130 chrislandreau LARSON, LYNN LARSON ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES LTD 7700 PIONEER WAY SUITE 101 GIG HARBOR WA 98335 -1164 (253) 858 -1411 FAX 253/858 -1410 Ilarson.Iaas(a.attglobal.net www.Iaasltd.com LENZ, BRETT R. RPA, LPG COLUMBIA GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES 904 E 2 AVENUE ELLENSBURG WA 98926 (509) 933 -3081 FAX (509) 933 -3088 blenzAgeoscientists.orq www.geoscientists.orq LUTTRELL, CHARLES ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL SERVICES 120 UNION AVENUE, SE - SUITE 103 OLYMPIA, WA 98501 3 (360) 586 -1040 FAX (360) 586 -1041 cluttrell@mail.ewu.edu MILLER, FENNELLE FENNELLE DeFOREST MILLER CONSULTANTS 605 NORTH ANDERSON STREET ELLENSBURG, WA 98926 (509) 899 -2448 fennellet kvallev.com MINOR, DR RICK HERITAGE RESEARCH ASSOC 1997 GARDEN AVENUE EUGENE OR 97403 (541) 485 -0454 or (360) 992 -7091 MISS, CHRISTIAN J NW ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOC INC 5418 20TH AVE NW STE 200 SEATTLE WA 98107 (206) 781 -1909 FAX (206) 781 -0154 cimiss(a northwestarch.com www.northwestarch.com NAKONECHNY, LYLE TRANSECT ARCHAEOLOGY 800 NE MICHIGAN PULLMAN, WA 99163 (509) 334 -1236 archaeological(a�aol.com POPE, CLARK PACIFIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS 3827 NE 9 AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97212 (505) 284 -5820 (503) 502 -7145 (mobile) pope pacarchcomcast.net R CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN & ASSOC 309 JEFFERSON HIGHWAY NEW ORLEANS LA 70121 (504) 837 -1940 / FAX (504) 837 -1550 www.rcqoodwin.com neworleans(a�rcgoodwin.com REID, ALFRED R ALFRED REID ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTING 2423 C STREET #6 BELLINGHAM WA 98225 (360) 752 -1766 RICE, DR PETE NATIONAL HERITAGE INC PO BOX 736 COLFAX WA 99111 VOICE /FAX (509) 397 -4471 Price590 @vahoo.com ROOT, DR MATTHEW J, RPA RAIN SHADOW RESEARCH INC 119 NORTH GRAND AVE PULLMAN WA 99163 -2605 (509) 332 -7495 Rainshadow(a�compietebbs.com ROULETTE, BILL R APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH 4001 NE HALSEY STREET, SUITE 3 PORTLAND OR 97232 (503) 281 -9451 FAX (503) 281 -9504 RUDOLPH, JAMES L KLEINFELDER INC 2315 S COBALT POINT WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 (208) 893 -9700 FAX (208) 893 -9703 irudolph@kleinfelder.com RUST, THOMAS C. LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2 AVE SOUTH EDMONDS WA 98020 (425) 778 -0907 FAX (425) 778 -6409 TOLL FREE (800) 552 -5957 trust(Iandauinc.com www.landauinc.com SCHALK, DR RANDALL CASCADIA ARCHAEOLOGY PO BOX 51058 SEATTLE WA 98115 -1058 (206) 366 -0337 FAX (206) 363 -5303 rfs(a wolfenet.com WALTON, BETH RPA WALTON ENTERPRISES 7425 EARLWOOD RD NEWBERG OR 97132 (503) 625 -5486 FAX (503) 625 -9064 WaltonEnterprises @onlinenw.com 4 WESSEN, DR GARY C WESSEN & ASSOCIATES 15028 24TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98166 (206) 242 -0525 gwessen@aol.com CRM POLICY PLANNING CONSULTANTS APPLIED PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGIES MARY K. ROSSI, M.A., PROGRAM DIRECTOR POB 5914 BELLINGHAM, WA 98225 -5914 (360) 920 -8908 mkrossi Last updated: 4/24/06 • • 5 • • ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE WELLS -FARGO BANK CV OPERATIONS LOCATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON by Jana L. Boersema Report Prepared for: Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 Cascadia Archaeology PO Box 51058 Seattle, WA 98115 -1058 February 27, 2008 • • ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE WELLS -FARGO CV OPERATIONS LOCATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION The Wells -Fargo CV Operations Building is a single story structure proposed to be built on a parcel at 6855 S. 180 Street, in King County in the city of Tukwila (Permit Number D07 -452). Because of the property's location along the Green River, an archaeological survey of the parcel was requested by both the Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Department and the King County Historic Preservation Program. An initial archaeological survey took place on February 11, 2008, which included only the parcel on which the proposed building will be constructed. Subsequently, the location and depth of two proposed stormwater detention vaults on neighboring parcels were clarified, and a survey of these additional areas was conducted on February 25, 2008. This report describes both phases of the survey. No cultural material was observed during the surveys and no further archaeological work is recommended for this project. Project Description The 13,500 square foot building will be built on the east half of Parcel E, an approximately one - acre lot (Figure 1). West of the building a covered truck parking area and open paved parking lot will be constructed. The foundation excavations for the building are not expected to exceed a depth of three feet (0.9 m); however, two 88 x 20 ft (27 x 6 m) stormwater detention vaults, associated with this project, will be excavated to depths of 11 feet (3.35 m) below the ground surface on neighboring parcels (Parcels B and D). At the time of the archaeological survey Parcel E was an undeveloped lot (Figure 2). The ground surface was generally level and covered with mowed weeds and grasses. The stormwater detention vault in Parcel D will be placed under a parking lot adjacent to the south edge of Parcel E. The proposed location is currently within a paved parking lot. The stormwater detention vault in Parcel B will be placed under a planned parking lot in an area that is currently an open mowed, grassy lot. The project area is surrounded by developed land, including warehouses, businesses, and large retail stores and restaurants. The Green River, confined by man -made levees, flows along the east edge of Parcel B before looping around a tight curve to flow along the west edge of parcels D and E. Project Location The approximately one acre project area is located in Sections 35 and 36 of Township 23 North, Range 4 East (Figure 3). The property, at 6855 S. 180 St in Tukwila, King County, is bounded on the north by South 180 Street. Sperry Drive forms the eastern boundary of Parcel E and a levee of the Green River forms the western boundary. An existing Wells Fargo building and parking lot are located in Parcel D, adjacent to the south edge of Parcel E. A stormwater " INSTH ST Darrwc sat WILT , CE VIA 4- 7 ' ffire - 611213110171 3.147 \ 1/4 ri\ARCHITECTURAL SITE SECTION • T-0. r:411.4, - • PARCEL "C" Auger probe number Auger probe location — Project area boundary = Stormwater detention Vault I +. °ARCHITECTURAL ., 11§:E:LAN 4 • TN /17%* 3 Figure 2. Overview of Parcel E from top of levee, facing east. 5 56 00 ornE. MN L. 0 t003 FEET 0 557000mE. .5 530 Project Area Printed from TOPOI 0t2000 National Geographic Holdnam (www.topo.com) NAD27 Zone 10T 55000 NAD27 Zone 10T 5 58 000 m E. MAE IOW IMEaS Figure 3. Project Vicinity shown on Renton, WA, 7.5" USGS topographic quadrangle (1994). detention vault will be placed underneath the parking lot. The stormwater detention vault in Parcel B is located on the east side of Sperry Drive. The project lies near the middle of the wide, level floodplain of the Green River at an elevation of approximately 25 feet. The parcel is at the inside edge of a tight meander bend of the river that historic maps suggest has been fairly stable in this location during the past 150 years (GLO 1862). ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND • • 4 The basic contours of the wide Green River Valley were formed in large part by the Late Pleistocene ice sheets that reached their maximum extent during the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, filling the Puget lowlands about 14,000 14 C years before present (B.P.) (Porter and Swanson 1998, Thorson 1980). The valley was carved out under the ice sheet, and after the glacier retreated it was inundated by a proglacial lake, and then subsequently by sea water, as part of the Duwamish Embayment, which reached upvalley south of Auburn (Thorson 1980; Dragovitch et al. 1994). The valley was gradually filled with sediment as the White and Green river deltas advanced down the valley, with especially rapid delta progradation after significant sediment input from the Osceola Mudflow 5700 years ago. The area around Orillia, in the project vicinity, likely remained a marine embayment until sometime between roughly 2900 and 2400 years ago, an estimate based on the delta progradation rates of Dragovitch et al. (1994). As the delta prograded, the environment around the project area transitioned from an estuarine delta to an alluvial valley with a classic low- gradient meandering river. In the Green River Valley, evidence of old river channels, flood basins, and natural levees suggests that frequent flooding led to regular avulsion events, in which old river channels were abandoned as new ones formed (Mulineaux 1970). Although historic maps suggest that the meander adjacent to the project area has remained relatively stable for the past 150 years, historic changes to the Green River in this area have been significant. The White and Green rivers were subject to frequent floods and changes to the river channel prior to historic period flood control measures. Prior to a large flood in 1906 the White River flowed north through the valley into the Green and Duwamish rivers. The 1906 flood diverted the White River entirely to the south into the Stuck River. Subsequently, the change was made permanent by flood control measures. Levees now line both banks of the river in the lower valley, and construction of the Howard Hanson Dam on the upper Green River in 1962 reduced the threat of very large flood events. CULTURAL BACKGROUND/LITERATURE REVIEW Ethnographic Background The Duwamish people were the Native inhabitants of this area according to oral histories, ethnographies, and historical accounts (Suttles and Lane 1990). Several villages on the lower Green and Duwamish rivers are recorded on early maps of the area and by place names given by the Duwamish people and recorded by T. T. Waterman in the 1920s (Hilbert et al. 2001). • • 5 Numerous place names recorded by Waterman attest to the significance of various features to the people living in the vicinity of the project area and record the location of villages, culturally significant places, and geographic features. Within one mile of the project area are seven named places recorded by Waterman and others, which were significant to the Duwamish. These locations include a village or camp known as besx""ugid, which means "a place that has swans" (Hilbert et al. 2001:137). The exact location of this site is unknown, but historic maps and descriptions suggest that the project area is within its possible boundaries near an historically documented marsh. However, the mapped area that may include this site (King County Historic Preservation Database) extends for a distance of nearly 0.75 mi along the west bank of the Green River, and the exact position of the site within this area is unknown. Waterman mapped another village or camp approximately 0.7 mi south of the project area, and several other geographic locations named for their physical attributes, uses, or significance are recorded in the Green River Valley. Historic Background Settlers began arriving in the Seattle area in the 1850s, and many headed south along the Duwamish and Green/White Rivers, settling homesteads in the valley. The Henry Adams land claim is across the river from the project area, to the south and east. Adams established a dairy farm on his land, despite having his house burned down during the Indian Wars of 1855 -1856 (Forsman and Larson 1997). His land patent was issued in 1866 (BLM 2008). The small town of Orillia, east of the project area, was established in 1887 (Dalan et al. 1981). Archaeological Background Prehistoric use of and habitation on the Green River floodplain have been documented by previously investigated sites in the vicinity of the project area. Within about 1.5 miles of the project area, only one prehistoric archaeological site has been previously documented (45KI6). It was a shell midden, buried under approximately 3 m of sediment, that was destroyed during construction activities. However, numerous other sites, somewhat farther from the project area, have been identified in similar topographic settings on the Black and Duwamish Rivers, including 45KI51, the Sbabadid site, and 45KI59, Tualdad Altu, which are village sites located along the banks of the Black River. Sbabadid is less than 1000 years old, while Tualdad Altu was occupied about 1600 years ago and is buried under 1.0 to 1.3 m of floodplain sediments (Chatters 1981, 1988; Chatters et al. 1990). Also near the Black and Duwamish River confluence are the Allentown site (45KI43 1) and the White Lake Site (45KI438), which are probable camp or village sites occupied within the last 550 years. The cultural deposits at the Allentown site are buried by 35 cm of plowed alluvium, while the cultural deposits at the White Lake Site are buried by at least 110 cm of alluvium (Lewarch et al. 1996). Other sites on the floodplains include both probable village sites and resource acquisition sites, many of which are buried by more than a meter of alluvial sand and silt. FIELD METHODS Research Design • • 6 Background research for this project was conducted at the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). Historic documents and reports were reviewed at the Cascadia Archaeology library and online. Additionally, Charlie Sundberg at the King County Historic Preservation Office was consulted regarding information contained in the county cultural resources database. The location of the project area on a dynamic flood plain suggests that it has the potential to contain deeply buried cultural material. Previous archaeological investigations in the Black, Green, and Duwamish River flood plains indicate the presence of sites buried by as much as 3 meters of alluvial sediments. However, because the river valley was a marine embayment during the early Holocene, it is unlikely to contain cultural material more than 2900 years old. Previously identified sites in the region include village sites that are marked by thick layers of charcoal and ash - stained culturally- modified sediment that form readily identifiable stratigraphic layers. For this reason, a subsurface survey of the alluvial strata in the project area with a 10- centimeter (cm) diameter auger efficiently samples the subsurface sediments and has the capacity to reveal areas of prehistoric occupation. Testing to a depth of approximately 2 m over most of the building construction site is sufficient to test Parcel E, in which construction activities will not exceed 3 feet (0.9 m). In the vicinity of the stormwater detention vaults, in portions of parcels B and D, the survey depth must reach the full extent of the 11 -ft (3.35 m) construction disturbance depth. Field Methods Archaeologists Jana Boersema and Sarah Thompson conducted a surface and subsurface survey of the Parcel E project area on February 11, 2008. This parcel measures approximately 134 m east -west and 34 m north- south. It was surveyed with two parallel east -west transects spaced 17 m apart. Hand - powered soil augers with 10 -cm- diameter buckets were used for subsurface sampling. Auger holes were spaced at 20 m intervals along the transects, with 6 probes excavated along each transect (Figure 2). The auger holes ranged from 180 to 200 cm deep. Usually the first 20 to 30 cm of each auger hole was excavated with a shovel at a slightly larger diameter until the auger could be started. The fill from each probe was screened through 1/4" hardware cloth mesh. In addition to the subsurface sampling, the surface of the project area was examined in a meandering pattern to take advantage of exposures of mineral soil provided by rodent burrows and truck tire ruts. Surface visibility was less than 5 percent over the project area. Subsequent to the first survey, we became aware of the stormwater detention vaults that were planned for placement on the neighboring lots adjacent to existing buildings. A follow -up survey of the vault areas was conducted by Jana Boersema on February 25, 2008. Two 350 -cm- deep auger holes were excavated in the vicinity of the stormwater detention vault in Parcel D. The vault location is currently under a paved parking area, so the auger probes were excavated in unpaved areas within 5 m of the planned vault location, one of which was in Parcel E and the other in Parcel D, 20 m south of the first probe. In the proposed location of the stormwater detention vault in Parcel B, one 350 -cm -deep auger probe was excavated in approximately the middle of the vault location, while a second auger probe was excavated to a depth of 195 cm about 8 m east of the vault location. Additionally, the surface of this open, grassy parcel was examined for evidence of cultural material in the vicinity of the stormwater retention vault and planned parking lot. Mole hills provided about 10 -15 percent mineral soil visibility in the east half of the proposed parking lot, while visibility in the west half was less than 5 percent because of vegetation cover. RESULTS • 7 No cultural material was encountered in any of the 16 auger probes or on the ground surface. The subsurface sediments in the probes consisted of layered alluvium that varied from silt to medium sand sized particles across the project area. Some evidence of historic disturbance was evident in the upper 60 cm of sediments, with a few fragments of glass, metal, and concrete encountered in the screened material and on the surface. The sediments in the probes in parcels E and D were characterized by layers of silt, fine sandy silt, and fine to medium -fine sand. Generally, layers of sandy silt and silt were found closer to the surface, while coarser sand was found below 80 cm. No evidence of significant buried soil layers was encountered, although a few blackened roots and traces of decaying organic matter were noted in several probes. In the vicinity of the stormwater detention vault in Parcel B, the sediments were dominated by coarser sandy material, and no silt was encountered below depths 120 cm. More detailed descriptions of the probe stratigraphy are presented in the Appendix to this report. The construction of the Green River levee along the west edge of the project area clearly altered the natural setting, but did not substantially alter the subsurface sediments in the project area. Significant fill material was evident only within the upper 38 cm of probe B -1, near the intersection of Sperry Road and South 180 Street, and the upper 32 cm of C -1 near the parking lot, both of which contained substantially more gravels and cobbles than other probes. Subsurface disturbance has undoubtedly occurred along the margins of the property as a result of road and utility construction; however, this archaeological survey indicates that the subsurface sediments are largely undisturbed over most of the project area. None of these sediments contained organic staining or concentrations of charcoal or other debris indicative of human occupation. The silt and fine- grained sand encountered in the probes is consistent with point bar deposition and overbank deposition on the Green River floodplain. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No evidence of prehistoric or historic activities was encountered during the field survey of this project area. Although the construction plans only call for excavation to depths of less than 3 feet (0.9 m) over most of the project area, the sediments were sampled to a minimum depth of 180 cm, and as deep as 350 cm in areas that will be disturbed to greater depths. No cultural material was found in the sampled sediment. While it is possible that undetected cultural 8 material is buried below 2 m in the shallowly sampled areas or 3.5 m in the more deeply sampled areas, the construction plans will not disturb sediment below 0.9 m over most of the project area, and only to depths of 3.35 m in limited areas for stormwater detention vaults. Historic and ethnographic accounts indicate the presence of Duwamish people in the vicinity of the project area, and suggest that a village or campsite may be nearby. However, evidence of an ethnographic period village would be expected relatively close to the ground surface, as seen at other sites in the region, such as the Allentown and White Lake Sites, which had cultural deposits within the upper 150 cm of soil. The specific location of besx""ugid village or camp, which was probably within 0.75 miles of the project area, is still unknown, but no evidence of it was found in the small project area. Because no cultural material was observed in this archaeological survey, it is recommended that the Wells Fargo Bank project proceed as planned. However, if any changes to project plans occur that require excavation of sediments below 1.8 meters (5.9 ft) in areas other than the stormwater detention vaults, it is recommended that additional archaeological survey work take place to sample sediments to the maximum depth of construction excavation. It is considered unlikely that the proposed project will disturb any significant cultural material, and no further archaeological work is recommended if the project is conducted as planned. However, it is possible that cultural material that was not detected in this survey may be encountered during ground - disturbing activities. If archaeological remains such as flaked or groundstone tools or debris, fire- modified rock, charcoal, stained sediments, bone, or concentrations of shell are encountered during subsurface excavations, work should be suspended at that location and the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) should be informed. If human remains are encountered, work must cease immediately in the vicinity of the remains, and the find must be secured. The King County Sheriff and Coroner should be contacted to determine if the site is a crime scene. If the human remains are determined to be potentially Native American, the DAHP, relevant government agencies and Native American tribes must be notified to develop a plan for the protection and treatment of the remains. REFERENCES 9 BLM (Bureau of Land Management 2008 Land Patent Details. Electronic document http: / /www.glorecords.blm.gov/ PatentSearch /. Accessed February 16, 2008. Chatters, James C. 1981 Archaeology of the Sbabadid Site, 45 KI 51, King County, Washington. Office of Public Archaeology, University of Washington, Seattle. 1988 Tualdad Altu (45 KI 59): A 4th Century Village on the Black River, King County, Washington. Report on file at Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Chatters, J. C., D. E. Rhode, and K. A. Hoover 1990 Tualdad Altu (45KI59): A Prehistoric Riverine Village in Southern Puget Sound. Archaeology in Washington 1:23 -48. Dalan, Rinita, Sandra Hunt, and Steve Wilke 1981 Cultural Resource Overview and Reconnaissance: Green River Flood Damage Reduction Study. Geo -Recon International Report, submitted to U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District. Dragovich, Joe D., Patrick T. Pringle, and Timothy J. Walsh 1994 Extent and Geometry of the Mid - Holocene Osceola Mudflow in the Puget Lowland: Implications for Holocene Sedimentation and Paleogeography. Washington Geology 22(3):3 -26. Forsman, Leonard and Lynn Larson 1997 Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, South Corridor (Tacoma -to- Seattle) Commuter Rail Project, Cultural Resources Overview. LAAS Technical Report #97- 18, submitted to Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, Seattle, WA. General Land Office 1862 Township No. 23 North, Range No. 4 East, Willamette Meridian. Electronic document, http://www.blm.gov/or/landrecords/survey/vPlatViewl 2.php ?path =PW A &name =t23 On040e 002.jpg, accessed February 6, 2008. Hilbert, Vi, Jay Miller, and Zalmai Zahir (editors) 2001 Puget Sound Geography, Original Manuscript from T. T. Waterman. Zahir Consulting Services, Federal Way, Washington. • 10 Lewarch, Dennis, Lynn Larson, Leonard Forsman, Guy Moura, Eric Bangs, and Paula Mohr Johnson 1996 King County Department of Natural Resources Water Pollution Control Division Alki Transfer /CSO Facilities Project, Allentown Site (45KI431) and White Lake Site (45K1438 and 45K1438A) Data Recovery. LAAS Technical Report #95 -8, submitted to HDR Engineering, Inc. Bellevue, Washington. Mullineaux, Donal R. 1970 Geology of the Renton, Auburn, and Black Diamond Quadrangles, King County, Washington. Geological Survey Professional Paper 672, pp. 1 -92. Porter, Stephen and Terry Swanson 1998 Radiocarbon Age Constraints on Rates of Advance and Retreat of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet during the last Glaciation. Quaternary Research 50, pp. 205 -213. Suttles, Wayne and Barbara Lane 1990 Southern Coast Salish. In Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp 485 -502. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 7, W. C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Thorson, Robert M. 1980 Ice -Sheet Glaciation of the Puget Lowland, Washington, during the Vashon Stade (Late Pleistocene). Quaternary Research 13, pp. 303 -321. Probe Depth (cm) Soil Description Content Notes A -1 0 -10 Slightly compacted, wet, brown silt. Few subrounded pebbles. Roots 10 -12 Slightly compact moist gray -brown coarse sandy silt. Approximately 10 -15 percent subangular to subrounded pebbles and gravels. Roots 2- Concrete fragments 12 -92 Compact, moist, brown silt. Few subrounded pebbles. Started using auger at 35 cm. 92 -180 Loose, moist, gray -brown sandy silt layered with brown silty sand. Pockets of fine sand throughout stratum. A2 0 -21 Loose, wet to moist sandy brown silt. Approximately 1 -5 percent subrounded pebbles. Roots 1- rusted nail 21 -38 Compact, moist, brown silt. Roots to 26 cm Started using at auger at 35 cm. 68 -89 Loose, moist, brown sandy silt. 89 -182 Loose, moist, gray -brown silty sand. Some pockets of fine gray sand. A -3 0 -33 Loose, moist, brown slightly sandy silt. Approximately 1 -5 percent subrounded to subangular pebbles. Roots 33 -56 Compact, moist, brown silt. Few subrounded pebbles. Roots to 35 cm Started using auger at 35 cm. 56 -65 Moist, slightly compact brown slightly sandy silt. Small roots 65 -102 Loose to mildly compact, moist brown silt with orange mottles. Blackened roots -- possible root bum. Decaying organic matter. 102 -185 Loose, moist, gray -brown silty sand with orange mottles. Some pockets of fine grained gray sands. Blackened roots -- possible root burn. Decaying organic matter. A -4 0 -68 Mildly compact to loose, brown slightly sandy silt. Approximately 1 -5 percent subrounded pebbles. 2 — Concrete fragments 1- Asphalt fragment 1- foil wrapper Roots Dense root zone top 15 cm. Switched to auger at 35 cm. 68 -82 Loose, moist, brown -gray sandy silt. Few subrounded pebbles. Small roots 82 -189 Loose, moist gray -brown silty sand with orange mottles. Pockets of fine grained gray sand. Blackened roots -- possible root burn. A -5 0 -55 Loose, moist brown sandy silt. Few sub - rounded to sub - angular pebbles. Roots 1- plastic fragment Dense root zone top 10 cm. Switched to auger at 35 cm. 55 -94 Loose, moist gray brown silty sand with orange mottles. Roots Blackened roots -- possible root burn. 94 -134 Loose, moist fine grained gray sands with pockets of gray brown APPENDIX: Auger Probe Log Table 1: Au :ter Drobe lo Probe Depth (cm) Soil Description Content Notes silty sand. 134 -171 Loose, moist gray brown silty sand with orange mottles. 171 -196 Moist, mildly compact brown silt. A -6 0-44 Loose, moist brown sandy silt. Few subrounded to subangular pebbles and gravel. Roots Switched to auger at 35 cm. 44 -180 Loose, moist gray -brown silty sand with orange mottles. Blackened roots -- possible root burn observed between 120 to 140 cm. 180 -185 Lens of dark gray fine sand. 185 -192 Loose, moist •ray -brown silty sand with orange mottles. B -1 0 -10 Sod, dark brown coarse sandy silt. Cobbles, gravels, and pebbles common. Mostly round, some angular. 2- asphalt fragments 10 -23 Light brown, silty coarse sand. Cobbles, gravel, and pebbles common. 23 -38 Medium brown very sandy silt. Gravel, cobbles, and pebbles common. 38 -60 Medium brown silt. Pebbles common. Few gravels. Started usin• auger 60 -90 Compact medium brown silt with orange mottling. 90 -100 Loose medium brown silt. 100 -120 Medium brown fine sandy silt 120 -200 Medium brown silty very fine sand. Mixed grayish and brownish sand. B -2 0 -10 Dark brown sod. Moist silt with few pebbles and gravel. Roots 10 -33 Medium brown silt loam. Very few pebbles. Cement pipe fragment 33 -110 Medium brown silt. 1- Brown glass fragment. (50 - 60 cm) 2 cm x 1 cm charcoal chunk (65 -75 cm) Started auger 110 -140 Medium brown, silty very fine sand with small, faint gray mottles. 140 -195 Medium brown silty very fine sand with layers of gray fine sand. B -3 0 -10 Sod. Moist, dark brown silt. 10 -28 Medium brown silt. Layer of rounded gravels at 25 to 28 cm. Synthetic rope at 15 cm. 28 -50 Medium brown silt. Started using auger. 50 -80 Layered grayish fine sand and medium brown silt. Platy iron oxide concretion approximately 2 cm x 1 cm. 80- 145 Reddish brown silt. Slightly sticky. 110 -120 cm —Iron oxide concretion. 145 -195 Medium brown silty fine sand with layers of gray fine sand. 2 Probe Depth (cm) Soil Description Content Notes B 0 -12 Dark brown sod — silt loam. Few gravels and pebbles. 12 -23 Medium brown fine sandy silt. Few gravels and pebbles. Started auger at 23 cm. 23 -50 Medium brown silt. 50 -85 Grayish brown fine sand. 85 -135 Medium brown very fine sandy silt. 135 -150 Layered slightly sticky brown silt and medium -fine gray sand. More sand than silt. 145 -155 cm — one broken medium pebble. 150 -198 Layers continue, but more silt layers than sand. Slight, faint orange mottles near base. B -5 0 -20 Dark brown fine sandy silt. Sod (0 -20 cm). Few large rounded gravels and pebbles. Bits of plastic 20 -60 Medium brown very fine sandy silt. Somewhat compacted at top. 35 -45 cm — corroded metal screw or nail fragment. 60 -130 Grayish brown fine sand layered with brown fine sandy silt. Distinct orange mottles 70 cm to 90 cm. 130 -195 Mainly grayish brown fine sand with layers of brown fine silty sand. B -6 0 -10 Sod Clear glass fragment 10 -19 Dark brown silt loam. Few small cobbles, gravels, and pebbles. 19 -100 Medium brown fine sandy silt. Started auger at 23 cm 100 -170 Grayish brown medium -fine sand. Layered with medium brown silty very fine sand. 170 -198 Grayish brown medium -fine sand with faint brown mottles. C -1 0 -32 Dark brown silt loam. Many rounded pebbles, gravels, and cobbles with some angular road gravel. 2 clear glass fragments pink plastic 32 -80 Medium brown fine sandy silt. Very few small pebbles Stared auger at about 35 cm. 80 -120 Grayish brown fine sand. Few orange mottles. 120 -190 Medium brown silt. 190 -240 Grayish brown silt very fine sand; orangish brown and gray mottles. 240 -270 Grayish brown silty fine sand layered with brown fine sandy silt. 270 -300 Grayish brown fine sand. 300 -340 Grayish brown silty fine sand. 340 -350 Grayish brown medium sand. C -2 0 -14 Sod; dark brown silt loam; few rounded and angular gravels. 14 -30 Dark brown sandy silt; slightly compact. Started auger at about 32 cm. 30 -70 Medium brown silty fine sand. 70 -90 Grayish brown fine sand; small orangish -brown and gray mottles. 90 -180 Medium brown slightly sandy silt. 3 Probe Depth (cm) Soil Description Content Notes 180 -220 Medium brown fine sandy silt; faint orange and gray mottles; few root fragments with blackened bark. 220 -240 Grayish brown fine sand; faint orangish -brown and gray mottles. 290 -340 Gray medium sand. 0.5 cm charcoal fragment At 330 cm. 340 -350 Medium brown silt; strong orange, blue - black, and gray mottles C -3 0 -14 Sod; dark brown silt loam; pebbles common; few angular gravels. Fragments of plastic 14 -50 Medium brown silt; very few pebbles. Started auger at 30 cm. 50 -120 Medium brown silty sand. 120 -165 Grayish brown medium -fine sand. 165 -340 Dark grayish brown medium sand. 340 -350 Dark grayish brown medium sand with faint orange mottles. C -4 0 -11 Dark brown silt loam; very few rounded pebbles 11 -50 Medium brown silt. Started auger at 26 cm. 50 -90 Medium brown silty fine sand. 90 -120 Medium brown silty fine sand; orangish brown mottles. 120 -145 Grayish -brown fine sand. 145 -195 Medium brown fine sand. 4 • • WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS City of Tukwila Project Consistency Narrative May 25, 2007 RECEIVED MAY 2 5 2007 D 1. The site is currently zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) and is located at the intersection of South 180 Street and Sperry Drive. Wells Fargo plans to develop its two remaining parcels in their existing campus surrounding Sperry Drive. Phase One includes the addition of an overflow parking lot for their existing operations. Phase Two includes plans to construct a new 12,983 s.f. building to be used for storage and sorting /processing of paper products. The facility falls under a light manufacturing use category. This use is permitted outright in the TUC zone. 2. The site is located in a fully developed area, surrounded by retail to the north, office to the east and a data processing facility also owned and operated by Wells Fargo to the south. The levy and Green River abut the Phase One parking lot on the east. The levy and Green River abut the west property line of the proposed new sorting facility. These two projects do not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and will not affect or alter the actual shoreline of the Green River or its existing pedestrian path located on the top of the levy. There is currently a worn path leading from the sidewalk along South 180 Street to the pedestrian pathway along the top of the levy cutting across the northwest corner of the site. We propose to maintain and enhance this path in keeping with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan Section 4.3.2 "Existing Public Access Sites ". 42% of the site will also be landscaped including informal open space in the northwest corner of the site. 3. The Green River is actually located beyond Wells Fargo's property lines. No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river. 4. There will be no disruption to of existing trees within the river environment except for minor trimming as necessary for public safety. Some of the existing low growing shrubs within the river protection easement will be replaced with low growing ground cover for bank control and public safety. The existing vegetation onsite consists only of grasses. The new landscaping will include some lawn, drought tolerant plantings, new trees and shrubs. 5. No effluents will be discharged into the Green River. 6. All State and Federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. The scope of work does not directly affect the Green River. A rock construction entrance and silt fencing will be provided during construction to reduce runoff sediment. 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 PH: 206.720.7001 Fax: 206.720.2949 Wells Fargo Project Consistency Narrative Page 2 of 2 • 0 7. The scope of work does not directly affect the Green River. No endangered species have been identified in the immediate vicinity and the surrounding area is fully developed. No wildlife habitat should be affected 8. A rock construction entrance and silt fencing will be provided during construction for erosion control. Landscaping and surface water control will be provided for the entire site for erosion control. 9. All necessary permits will be obtained by the Wells Fargo team including SEPA review, Shoreline Permit, Grade and Fill, Building, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection. 10. Dredging is not part of this project and will not be required. 11. Mining is not part of this project and will not be required. 12. Solid waste disposal will be removed from the site. 13. This is private property and will remain private property for private use. 14. Landfilling within the river channel is not part of this project and will not be required. 15. The removal of cottonwood trees within the river environment of the low impact environment is not part of this project and will be required. 052307 P rojConsisten cyN a rrative. doc STATE OF WASP IINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees. agents engineers, contractors or other re rrsgsentatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property. located at 19 s s.18,3+\., �T- for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. , y,1T / EXECUTED at SE --€ (city), tt'V / A. t' (state), on 24 20 O3—_ y �� (Signature) Yl On this day personally appeared before me l o me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she sign the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. o�� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS j`f DAY OF resjding at ,Sletor Lrnt, 1 on AA 5 i (y goi0 P \Plummy Fonm 4.ppli u on 'Shore-6-0t. dx • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southeenter Boulevard, Tukivila, IVA 98/88 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukulan(cki.tukwi Ia. w•a.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY MDMAS bAtkleS (Print Name) 'lq C , SC4\-ME ) p . 431o4_. (Address) 2-b4, - , - ee Z Z 61 - S ( O , (Phone Nu My Commission expires NOTARY PUBLIC in and for State of Washington MAY 2 5 2007 GC/PiiMUNITY O€VEI.OPMENT 700 De dober 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -SHORE Planner: File Number: LO 1 — 03 S ---- Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: p,f2i 07 -00 - 1 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: €C 1 — p 09 Lial 031 APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 1)4 1u--5 ARG n - CA/ APE 2ATt Osi s • U CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community DevelopmeRECE1V D SHORELINE 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 MAY 2 5 2601 PERMIT Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -366 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement 3b -a3 4- ' o l'7 G LOT) l -L -' 3LQ -'3 - 049 o75 .w7 aL 31494 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: j9 2 'fi=t vie 5— 4 , ) SePolLE 1 O 961 1 a Phone: 0��4 -74=15 c \ FAX: -'no 2, / E -mail: - • SS � ► 1 "MN Signature: I Date: a/1 D i P:Wlanning Fern's \ Applications \Shore- 6.06.doc December 4, 2006 Check items submitted with application Information Required. it'AY 2 5 2 May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Plannin9V pp NT APPLICATION MATERIALS: '..,4 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 'V 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ". 'V 4. Application Fee $2,340. 'V 5. SEPA Environmental Checklist (see SEPA Application Packet). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: - N "--.1 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Si s Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 7, Payment of a $100 mailing label fee to the City of Tukwila or Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks- -must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). WA 8. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each ' property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: NSA 9. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). i=1EZ M 1 . Cv►_stue_. 6% `..1 10. Vicinity Map with site location, does not have to be to scale. 11. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria ,LSee A�pplicati ) Check with a planner if you are unsure what criteria apply to your project. �� .� ' 6, MA 12. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). Provide a geotechnical analysis of river bank stability if alteration is proposed. See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www.ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd /dcdplan.htm) for additional information. SHORELINE SITE PLAN: ` �1 13 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". Er COMPLETE APPLICATION C. ECKLIS' The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206- 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). P:\Planning Fomu \Applications'.Shore.6- 06.doc REce December 4, 2006 Check items submitted with application Information RgiPred. W May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning (b) Existing top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water mark and base flood elevation (i.e., the 100 year flood). 14/A (c) For work riverward of the MHWM: Distance work extends into the river and distance to Federal projects and navigation channels. (d) If the project is within the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program show the limits of the 40' River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact environments. If subject to the King County Shoreline Master Plan identify the appropriate setback per KCC 25.16. V 'V (e) Dike/ riverbank maintenance easement (min. 30' from the top of bank). N J (f) Construction limit lines and areas of clearing/grading/filling including volume and type of fill or extracted material. "� (g) Public access and/or trails. �\ (h) Parking lots, driveways, loading and service areas. CROSS - SECTIONS FOR SHORELINE PROJECTS V 14. SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS at maximum 75' intervals along the shoreline showing: • Existing and proposed elevations and improvements, • Limits of the 40' River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact environments, • The top of bank elevation, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water mark and base flood elevation (i.e., the 100 year flood), and Dike/ riverbank maintenance easement (min. 30' from the top of bank). LANDSCAPE PLAN: 15 (a) Landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". See TMC 18.52 or KCC 25.16.030 as appropriate. N (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: 16 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36 ". Wk (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks, tracts and protection measures. N.4 (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. . • CIVIL PLANS: • �1 17 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". • N,...1 (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See , www.ci.tukwila.wa.us /pubwks /bulletins /floodcontrol.pdf for further information N,..l (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. N (d) Construction limit lines, areas of clearing/grading /filling and volume and type of expected cut and fill. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements. • N.X (f) If additional impervious surface is proposed, provide a storm drainage design at least 90% P:1Planning Forms`Applications \Shore- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Check items submitted with application Information Re. _ red. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to www.ci.tukwila.wa.us /pubwks /pwpermit.htm #techinfo. (g) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (h) Footprints of all existing and proposed buildings. --..,.. (i) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls. OTHER: V 18. If new construction is proposed, provide dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and /or any proposed screening. 19. If site lighting changes are proposed provide a luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot - candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. 21. Any other drawings or materials needed to explain your proposal. „ 4. P:\Planning Forms \Applications \Shore- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: a '► • EL p42k- ,vT 2. Name of Applicant: 3 I cam. C �t R AH rrean , Pu 3. Date checklist prepared: • MRY 1..5 Zoo? 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): a R(Z »aG, 910? , 1t.-Zep c t t c fr 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 1 O 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been - prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. P, TEL1A OPaL. R- p A V L I7, 2007 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Agency Comments P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 Applicant Responses: • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 9. List any government appr a ls or permits that will be needed for your proposal. RiNZ) ‘14.6 ` .tMC\ - 1 2 .U.11-01146 ) '+? XY1 I(AVCl'\I\ 4 L , 1 _ Crat GA1. ?WOM AFt ft w . 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 1:::1\p_Gl. I1 12 w-fl - &P CoNG.BLDG Sra trt" •,Lola 1 . 1 -- SO Agency Comments - 1231o4 LSD A), t oR tS"c'�j t"�1n�C\c) -1 p" PPS iJv�GT" t Cs7\s 'U 5 E..1., C.'(NA PN2 5 t_'s� LL ern sv�9 4 � P( - A - 5o - C.c\R C� ►� A 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, — vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. �ititRr..i. ° t5 t.-ac.A ), p Th .5W C..a • ER \ L s '5j \\ SPVQ'R4 091\1Z. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Ol • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth - a. General description of the site (circle one rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ok D wt-s pi ctrY U . c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. • S7E�E. I�"TC�.G D ci $ t c- _ 1D0 4" t0'1li.1 L"C C S4\-t 50 SA'kAO'( 5 (\AA 1 1 ( L w 9 A\ tu5 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable, soils in the immediate vicinity? If o, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 14pRoc. &pc) or- nti"\RE. •.)c.c.NP.7•Nic5A1 - 7kavIcOc.) , 1MPc1 g x v : 0 4 \L.L \/.\t LL f X -. 2o0 S API 1 W 1 LL iJ I \, D Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally descri.e. • _ :\ O St LT OW-E. 'RV-AA - e 6 S lit M V g. • ► . ass • About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? SEES % h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • ►holey e .. , ■ *,. *.alt' i FIs ..SItM\ ir)s\ C tms - ta.1 : LAN McAP NCI SAMCZ W (� fz Co ol.: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. IxP_1t16% CA.ISCelACWW. SPA 1 u,1KV7 \YE *C- M IsSInAAS Q t c� QUI `t (IAR.A1a6 C0P- .o lt4b, - ♦ ta La i._• Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water • • c,IALiCSox:s. AQ YV1 t L aL 8Ly P4 -- t a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Pam 1 . ��. 'E1J � , uJ S \ • 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. s -r s\,) (c.Nm.e_ t LL S P■P'? 10 WoM fir. int:)P. W \14 t 1n` c9.01 e9. LykAt gi p` w '• - - '� per 'E.`-►VMtZ 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Agency Comments ® • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, . purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Q 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1. Will ground waterbe withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give 1 general description, purpose; and approximate quantities, if known. t� Applicant Responses: • 0 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will,this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. _ • • ■ 1lk%' •'•..• 1 _ .LIkA. QUA L —NAY \ k& V P'eQ SIT-( � - C 0AQAOS PV S . \ScrtA\ &T, 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 0 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: •4• y \S \ & \t 9,644 W - S 2 1- kt -tf»GP P I ta. Agency Comments 1 Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen,[otherr) Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. U 1a k.1■1 o wn,1. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: {ALA '1AP..v\ \)' c '' kV_o ktNE T1<. myA R..l 11. .7 C•• 140 vNs* LAWN es E»fizCzz► Agency Comments • 0 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 1\16 W t U `8 -n-vi4 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be -used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. �c. Gks — l-(TNE, s o All 2s Agency Comments E A I ured Gkuri oat< A sotto asp.( 5 410 r atµ P ,,,o ( °uk tan•tl (ar'- 1Z.v ¢� • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: • 110 .ol►i II fr _ 11 p it "'FBI S� Wi\sirk1\4-'dt 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of t his proposal? If so, describe. t� 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. hM ■L r 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 5` T. L.S, G \-k\ Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise • 0 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? TH t RUSY v71 -k '4 k 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. (B‘A ckq n-N 1AokS_s ,I, - 0 • .TA PLO`(E_- t C. . 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: atZ C��'2u.1 Tcx� WQ'4.N15t tem gib r siAr■ik . L y�l 'E 1Ca ��e ss TOE R.0 e_v_s 4 TeAwt L. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Zzt4 t1-1 .1 1dV 014 OA) U . Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 1G Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the 'current coniprehensive:plan desi of the site? TUoLiAI Uei3A ( to & te : :w MT\ . PAR.1,--l. 6 ( &IA s 1..4 a Q..AVti fit" g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Applicant Responses: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? v fit' m M-- rt wrv\ c I\e-C j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 1\\O-tA Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: D4Sflvl 1:S I�t 1 aOep l 'T Tur Zp 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Agency Comments ® • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 'I`1.a c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 1 M' 'SV`'ES •. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 2Zu 1 . �� • WALL �N' l� b. What views in the immediate'vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 1401 _ 114 1 LA(z) - To��lst� �, 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? GLARE VS ki4liGjefcro, o 014 - v - k , \ o PitekA file) Parief �tA - t - a 'CC►1J� � (N � TA �a irm mea kt.fr I-4 tit - rc rcn.p _ b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 12. Recreation • 0 LL d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: - FM t \LL_`R �NI L 'lb `AkiAvm\Z AA L\G N O "sue a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. a b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. ,Show on site plans, if any. .14 De-kzE: • 5 Q-'r oc? -\\Iam b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? X. 4 orb t '1 0 ■R ‘‘c al.J311.45 5 Voe 6V e. VP)� PARS.! t4a5 C) . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 140 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. . l t as A p>so pviik poY - 4 kR,p),\I 1�G, ca. \isr\ - ..\ ac..c g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: I\! n. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 'RAT ' X`PE.C\=. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: system other: septic Signatur Date Submitted: 1 o Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 1 . 16 •t WeSt 'SNrAt' Grr 'C�u�cv��L� C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. N- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). Agency Comments City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: )1t Y 15, 2-o7 • D -11 e Z r Nr Street Address: \92-t i2 [ 1\ J 5�' .405 . City, State, Zip: ��R� A gala 1 Telephone: 2,06? -720 Ob Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 1 - Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 C YE ,:ontinue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 - 15). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 - Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle a 4 4 ropriate response. 13 Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 - Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt sh•uld answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6 - YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 • Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -3 . c kj `�'ts=- �° ` - i - `c" 0. /e.4't `S r 310 {`✓ 0 I4- LO M cy� Continue to Question 2 -3 2 - ill the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 - Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) 4:/) Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a w. ercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) Part B (continued) • City of TukwioSA Screening Checklist 1 - Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. City of Tukwila Screening Checklist 3 - Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please c' le appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, rticularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 - Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete s + _ ctures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) from a watercourse or the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET i# DESCRIPTION ISSUE FOR ISSUE FOR ISSUE FOR ISSUE FOR SITE PERMIT REVISION PRICING COORDINATION BID PERMIT RESUBMITTAL ENCLOSED BUILDING 980k COVERED TRUCK LOADING AREA: TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF: BUILDING COVERAGE GENERAL BULDNOI TT 21 80E ARE 55.500 S.F. OCCLPANCY TYPE B - LIGHT MANUFACTURING TYPE COVER SHEET. PROJECT TEAM AND PROJECT INFORMATION OCCUPANCY i gl wATEN CLOSETS • DRINKING FOUNTAIN T1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION MEN RUMEN MANS RAID MEN WOMEN T1.2 ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES 2 3 1 1 F15NRE PER 2 WATER CLOSETS 2 T1.3 EGRESS PLAN /ACCESSIBLE ROUTE N/A TOTAL 680D - 2 3 1 - 2 2 0 0 TOTAL PRO4IDED - CIVI 3 1 - 3 2 0 C1 COVER SHEET • C2 DEMOLITION PLAN • C3 EROSION CONTROL • C4 GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN • C5 WEST STORM WATER VAULT • C6 EAST STORM WATER VAULT • C7 WATER AND SEWER PLAN • C8 NOTES AND DETAILS • LANDSCAPING L -1 LANDSCAPING PLAN • L -2 LANDSCAPING PLAN • L -3 IRRIGATION PLAN • L -4 IRRIGATION PLAN • ARCHITECTURAL A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN • A2.1 FLOOR PLAN • A2.2 REFLECTED CEIUNG PLAN A2.3 FINISH PLAN A2.4 SECURITY COORDINATION PLAN A2.5 ROOF PLAN A3.1 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES A3.2 WALL. DOOR. REUTE TYPES A3.3 WALL TYPES A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • A4,2 WALL SECTIONS A6.1 ENLARGED PLANS. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.2 ENLARGED PLANS. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7.1 STANDARD DETAILS A7.2 MILLWORK DETAILS A8.1 EXTERIOR DETAILS STRUCTURAL S2.) STRUCTURAL. FOUNDATION PLAN S2.2 STRUCTURAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN S3.1 STRUCTURAL PANEL ELEVATIONS S4.1 STRUCTURAL. FOUNDATION DETAILS S4.2 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION DETAILS S5,1 STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAILS S5.2 STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAILS ELECTRICAL E0.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND E0.1 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES • E0.2 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES E1.0 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN • E1.1 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN • E2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN -POWER E2.2 ROOF PLAN -POWER E3.0 FIST FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING E6.0 ELECTRICAL - ONE UNE DIAGRAM EB.0 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS E8.1 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS MECHANICAL M0.0 MECHANICAL LEGEND M0.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - MECHANICAL M2.2 . ROOF PLAN - MECHANICAL M6.0 MECHANICAL DETAILS M6.) MECHANICAL DETAILS PLUMBING P0.0 PLUMBING. LEGEND P0.1 PLUMBING. SCHEDULES P1.0 UNDERGROUND PLAN. PLUMBING P2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN. PLUMBING P2,2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN. PLUMBING P3.0 ENLARGED PLANS PLUMBING P6.0 DETAILS. PLUMBING B18DNO AREA ENEMY CODE COIPLINJCE ERV¢DPE: couPoRENr WHIM: LEMING POWER ALLOWANCE ENCLOSED BUILDING 980k COVERED TRUCK LOADING AREA: TOTAL AREA UNDER ROOF: BUILDING COVERAGE 12.983 SF. 5,682 S.F. 18,665 S.F. 345 (18665 SF./55.500 SF.) BULDNOI TT 21 80E ARE 55.500 S.F. OCCLPANCY TYPE B - LIGHT MANUFACTURING TYPE IN YES SPRD80DtED. YES FRE ALARNS CRITICAL AREA AFFECTED WINCH 200' OF DA/RELINES ENEMY CODE COIPLINJCE ERV¢DPE: couPoRENr WHIM: LEMING POWER ALLOWANCE OCCUPANT LOADS (2003 BC TABLE.) TOTAL RATO OM. LOAD WOO EMUS PRONDFD not ACCE98IF WS OFFICE: 12.683 1:100 130 2 3 2 TOTALO 12,983 130 PARRIO TE01RiB4BRB PAFONG REQ&800R 12.683 SF. NEW OFFICE 0 1:300 - 43 20,200 SF. EXISTING OFFICE 0 1300 - 67 110 ACCESSIBLE STALLS 500(98ED = 5 058881G PROVIDED: NEW OFFICE STALLS PROVIDED - 45 E705W11G OFFICE PROAOED • 68 TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED - 113 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED • 9 PARCEL $' NEW PARIONG PROVIDED - 56 PLAA13203 FIXTURE FEOtB OCCUPANCY i gl wATEN CLOSETS LAVATORIES DRINKING FOUNTAIN DOVER RATIO MEN RUMEN MANS RAID MEN WOMEN BUSINESS (8) 10,811/200 x 2 3 1 1 F15NRE PER 2 WATER CLOSETS 2 2 1/150, 1/500 E%CEEIXNG 150 2 TOTAL N/A TOTAL 680D - 2 3 1 - 2 2 0 0 TOTAL PRO4IDED - 3 3 1 - 3 2 0 0 WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS Tukwila, Washington SITE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL NOVEMBER 09, 2007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCT NEW SINGLE STORY BUILDING WITH ENCLOSED, PARTIALLY COVERED, TRUCK BAY. NEW CONSTRUCTION TO BE CONCRETE TILT -UP. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REINFORCED CONCRETE CAST -IN PLACE STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION ERECTION STEEL JOIST ERECTION STEEL DECKING STRUCTURAL STEEL EMBEDS IN CONCETE MECHANICAL ANCHOR INSTALLATION REINFORCED MASONRY: CMU, LEVEL 1 CMU, LEVEL 2 PROJECT INFORMATION PARCEL 'E': PARCEL '8': WELLS FARGO BANK WELLS FARGO BANK VACANT LOT TUKWILA PARKING LOT S. 18071i DRIVE 6847 S. 180TH DR. TUKWILA, WA TUKWILA, WA TAX PARCEL # PARCEL 'E' 36- 23- 049095 PARCEL 'B' 36- 23- 049017 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 'E': 362304 95 PORS OF GL 4 & OF GL 1 IN SEC 35 LY S OF 1/16 LN EXTND DAF BEG AT NW COR OF SEC 36 TH S ALG W LN THOF 1355.89 FT TO TPOB & S MGN OF S 180TH ST TH ELY ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 02 -45 -45 E RAD 336 FT C/A 01 - - A DIST OF9 FTTOSLNOFN36FTOFSDGL4 TH 5 88 -46 -19 E ALG SD S LN 274.81 FT 1H ON CRV RGT RAD 50 FT C/A 90 -00-00 A DIST OF 78.54 FT TH S 01 -13 -41 W 58 FT TH N 88 46 - 19 W TO SWLY LN OF GL 1 IN SEC 35 TH NWLY ALG SD SWLY LN TO WLY D(T OF N LN OF SD GL 4TH S 88 - 46 - 19 E ALG SD WLY EXT TAP 142.38 FT W OF NW COR SD GL 4 TH ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 27 -59 -36 E RAD 336 FT 147.96 FT TO TPOB TGW UND INT IN PRIVATE RD ADJ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES PARCEL . B': 362304 17 POR OF GL 4 IN NW 1/4 BEG AT NW COR OF SEC TH S ALG W LN THOF 1355.89 FT TH ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 02 - 45 - 45 E RAD 336 FT C/A 01 - 32 - 04 A DIST OF 9 FT TO S LN OF N 36 FT OF SD GL TH S 88 -46 -19 ALG SD S LN 372.81 FT TH S 01 - - W 305 FT TO TPOB TH N 01 - - E 100 FT TH S 88 -46 -19 E 348.04 FT M/L TO ELY BOY OF SD GL TH SLY ALG SD ELY BDRY TAP BRG 5 88 -46 -19 E FR TPOB TH N 88 -46 -19 W 370 FT M/L TO TPOB TGW UND INT IN PRIVATE RD ADJ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: FIRE ALARM & MONITORING SYSTEM DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, SIGNAGE WILL BE PROVIDED BY DESIGN /BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS PER IBC SEC. 106.3.4.2 CODE /ZONING INFORMATION GOVERNING BUILDING CODE: 2003 IBC (SEE SHEET T1.2 FOR COMPLETE UST) RECEIVED NOV 2 6 20111 rr ATTACHMENT A ZONE TUKWILA OMAN CENTER (NC) Wl0lA1 BUL DNO MOM WWI ALLOWABLE ARE OP NVIOUB AREA NONE 115'-0' 19,000 SF BASE ALLOWABLE PER 1BLE 503 (B OCC. & O9 CO4SIR) sax PROJECT DIRECTORY ARCHITECT OF RECORD: CONTACT: JESSICA BRADLEY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE: CLIENT: CONTACT: TOM DAWES GENERAL CONTRACTOR: CONTACT: KYLE FRY GEOTECHINICAL ENGINEE CONTACT: CRAIG ROVER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CONTACT: DOUG WILSON MEP ENGINEER CONTACT: REM WILSON CML ENGINEER: CONTACT: DAN BALMEW LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: WI LIAM BROWN CONTACT: 16830 90T11 DRNE SE CORKY BROWN BOTHE-L, WASHINGTON 980124083 P(425)417 9425)488 -1564 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CRAFT ARCHITECTS, PLLC. 1942 FIRST AVENUE. SUITE 408 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98101 P(208)720-7001 C 9208)720 -2949 KATHY WELLS FARGO BANK CORPORATE PROPERTIES 999 THIRD AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98104 P(208)292-3181 F(208)292-3475 POE CONSTRUCTION 1519 W VALLEY HWY N, SUITE 103 AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98001 P (253)833.2400 F (253 GEO•ENGUBERS 800 STEWART STREET, SURE 1700 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 P (208)7284674 F (208)728.2732 DCI ENGINEERS 3120 COLBY AVENUE, SUITE 100 EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98201 N425)252-0454 9425)252-1899 GLUMAC ENGINEERS 320 SW WASHINGTON ST, SUITE 200 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-2640 P(503)227.280 9503)274 -7674 BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS 18125 72ND AVENUE LENT, WASHINGTON 98032 P(425)2514222 9425)251 -8782 PROJECT LOCATION tit 1 1 Pg 8 12858 CI 8 i ° I •g a a bnDOOo® S® 1 11 1 1fit 144% A i Or " PA 11 r N �GHAe ✓ • _ it -; s. M 4 0' Cj t` P 40 ENO Fk:P: \12000. \12858 \ engineering \12858- 01.dry q 1 13. PPM 11111!! Iiilli '4 ' ' qii g q dloo 1? 1 API 4 I 61 1 3 cos a 1 ! Ax x g g m 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH 0ei4nid -� KENT. WA 98032 °r,,,,,, __CM (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX ° d 0 CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, Nroormd_IMMa SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES mt. 8/77/O1 CEIMI trojnOt-1 Gme/Tmp:11 /8/2007 10:51 AM Scaler -0 - 1 0 BWOLLASTON X el: , 212858 -e dwg, 212858- I.dwg, Al2858 -E.dwg 1 CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 RRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 1 If f i i li i i l i pliplpflpj 1 illpg 111114 1 1111011 pi 1 p 4 ,Ra Q p� >g � $ s 4 g T{ 1 li� g4 . s '& el!MO X R Ntl 1 ♦ , $ - v y q N i tva tl 1� !Mg 1 . 11 ,. 1 . 041 n i 1�1; g s; 29 ll 1 15 1a = Ng a tR i:! !� ggs ga I; 1 p i % IT s i 9 i i :ig Ifi 8 8 - q g 7 R ��q {� q ° q 8 a � !! � 3 q �% q �A Y All � a � 7 � P � � 1 fT q � j i q 13 q q R 1 / ql! 1 3 11'.." q l ; l 1> q d s aas s Fi giii COVER SHEET WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATION TUKW ILA, WASH. O O 2 i 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERIES De:signed __AS_ Drown _BOK Checked __AS_ Approved Q. Dote 5/22/02 \ 12000e \ 1211513\ engineering \ 12858-N dog Dote/Time:11/5/2007 10:52 MI Sol'-0 1 BWOLLASTON X ef: z12856-1 doe, z1 2858-e dog :12856-Adwg .„ • CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 No DEMOLITION PLAN Revision 0 8 8 0 m e E2Q 0 Z 614 r 0 WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. Jab Numb., 03 8 — _i -- : P P f Y N 'o P P P '1'111 11' : iIi Pi ' p gi 1 !I 1 1 1 ! q s il l lopi liolip idil : I R. ih ,' !! 1 i li w' t 0 P: Ph di) d 1 IT 1 1 ! l i 1 1 i ' rile i: A 1 111 ; 1$1 di 1 2 j l 1! 18 1 I .� 1 i IRA � H e � ! g P 7 '�G ENGIN 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL_ SERVICES Designed L D rawn _MX Chocked _AL pwwYed _DM D ote 8/22/07 fib:P: \12000e \12858 \engineenrp \12858 - E.dwg OotefTime:11 /8/7007 10:53 AM ScaIe:1' - 0' w 1' O'_XREF P f 1 N BWOLLASTON Xrel: , xI2858 -1Awg, x12858- e.dwg, P x12858 -b dwg n loog g 1 7. ig 4 8 8 0 0 m of CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 A 0 0 0 0 n D D 2 No • P e. P P P N � i !P, Pig liq i 1 iii I I lii i PX IDI 0,All 1$ iq 101 2 ‘ ) 7 /. 4 1 Pi i % 1;ii iir OF € i 04 !AP z Fi l ! SARA 8 X n pp! ill i i: 1 1 !$ ;ii 1: ! biip EROSION CONTROL PLAN �1 0 8 0 PI 2 WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. D T 8 P P P P n j� sy �'" Ip Yfz A4 L ! Fj FI 8 i y FJ r P P 5 2 11:hy8,1Alx '1 s 011 fl ; 12! /1! NI t 1 1 Jr I 1 A 1 0 O 2A Z O hilq 4 w 0 - o D Z 8 Jab Number 12858 C4 8 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CIVIL ENGINEERING, IANU PUNNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Designed _.Id_ Orman _8L18 Clualtad App,oaad Data LI/22AT s ia:v: \12000s\12856 angimmtng \Rasa -D1 dwa Gata/rn,e:11/N /t007 135 PM Scaia:l -o' 1' -o _XREE NWQLIASTON X ei: , x12858- t.dwg, x12858 -e drg. 212858 -D.dng CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Na. Data Ravtatan WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. mks GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN a o ¥ D A 0 8 o D z 0 s rn n f D o z z Jab Number 12858 C5 8 St K 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Poe P. \12000.\12658 \ engineering \12658 -07 dog Oat./lune,' I/n/2007 10.47 Sculn, - b o worma — - D rown _> Mocked __Aa_ ro Dab 0122107 / • 9N'OLLASTON /Oat , [12055 -b.d.g EXPIRES r 3 1S A 0 O 9 CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 RRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 No Date ey as row• Revision WEST STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS WELLS FARGO — CV 0PERA110NS TUKWILA, WASH. rn 0 rn �o D r rn C) — 1 0 cn z D z 0 0 rn r V /j' / / / taut ws EL_z CELL 2 i 0.50 EAST STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS 0 _STATIC WA, 0,21,147 . _ BOTTOM OFF WALL 11■11.65 PLAN VIEW scole t•-s• TAW REMOVABLE GRATE /.-APPROXMATE RADE SECTION B-B SCHC t• S' M t•_7 v • �tY DIAMETER MET (TP.) Au FOUR CORNERS fj\ MOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A ROW RESTRICTOR RISER - EAST VAULT SCALE 1• -5' M t'-2' V 1 2 z z 1— W 0 EL _ Q O A 1 hill i 1 CO ✓ 2 2w0gA M ACCESS c . ) • ••♦♦♦♦••♦•♦•• 1 ... A il. ! rvl C• • REMOJABLE s 01 MADE OF STAINI S STEEL. WOOD. FIBERGLASS OR PLASM • /// CELL 1 5'x10' REMOVABLE GRATE CELL 2 sr 1 26' B4• V /j' / / / taut ws EL_z CELL 2 i 0.50 EAST STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS 0 _STATIC WA, 0,21,147 . _ BOTTOM OFF WALL 11■11.65 PLAN VIEW scole t•-s• TAW REMOVABLE GRATE /.-APPROXMATE RADE SECTION B-B SCHC t• S' M t•_7 v • �tY DIAMETER MET (TP.) Au FOUR CORNERS fj\ MOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A ROW RESTRICTOR RISER - EAST VAULT SCALE 1• -5' M t'-2' V 1 2 z z 1— W 0 EL _ Q O A 1 hill i 1 CO Job Number 12858 C7 8 � ° HA ° : 'T ''O VINO / / 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES / / / 9dgna0 AL Drown _MI Owen! _Ai wPrond Dote 5 /71/07 File�P: \120004 \12858 \enginee log \12858 -NS dwg 0ola/1m:!l /8/2007 4:44 PH Scale: 1' -0 - I 0_XNEF / / / Scats Norinwdcl VorOccl N/o UNOLSTAD %ref CaiiL WQ1(Ji111 NM 212858- I.dwg, x12858 -e.dw , 412858 -b dreg 1 2 If 1 / 1 A HI! Hie CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 RRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 g Yg g q g ! q hF b Ig No h P ell T: / , / D oh WATER AND SEWER PLAN WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. 8 dIE nn s �o ga hi 00 lE A� m hU � r r Z 0 0 2 ist i ii ��'N p i Y P' N Y N FFiiii LZ5� E � ii i% i 4 Ili 8 i 1 I li pil 11 lg g' A i 1 1 1 ill 1 e ; il 1 F IP xi e iil p% WV; lb 1.? g l ii sqii 'He m i: 1/ h 111 Pol gi$11N1 II IF ihl 1 i 11: i ! 11 ;1 — a ! gi Viiir.'ill R§I 14i li 1� i h a ; ! ill 1 p .Ig >i 18 ? g 1 / 1 1 L lx.o.F,0 AR i 01 ' 11 i i i i f 5 ; 'g' i i ! i li! Xi 1Pg g. 1 151; 1 I llii 1 1 1 li I 11 1 ' I wg 3 I 9 * i it I 11 0 1 19 ; 1 ih " lig i 1 h , !/ - g . i i ' 4 I i " i ' '1 ! 11 I : 4 ; g b ! pi. lih ! s p. P i h 1, c Z i I 11; q4 1 1 ii H i 101 i ! i illi Y N iir Pri 11;1! �� go op d gg gi eg 1.101,m >a g ; g Orlig 11; AT ;PI 101 MMM �1 : kl X ill '1E FI P S g 4 L 2 Y N 106 IN h Fl; 2 1 2 F~ N Olm 6P N FIP Y f Y N /g Pi Peiq ~ p i Mi1n 4 l All 11 IN ;i9.1 ,g 61 1;1J, 1 ¢ P P MO 1 11; ri > g /i ! A 410 ! A g-i 1;1 y I gii 1 1 IR 4 8 4 1 111 ;g5 1 IA r u 1 , a 1 5 91 liPP 11 A 8 L 22 LL S f P 111 L P • Y N g51 8 111 14 1 6- 51 M 11 C41 g ro ; 511 ;511: :hi 10 : ffl 1 1 c 10 gal p I I fi 1 b 0 P . Y N Z c 0 z z 0 rri VI D z 0 0 rn O z Na. I Dot. I �, I I APP•. A r iab Number 12858 C8 8 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX C 1L ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES D..lga.e Draw Chodwd A_ZEL Dab J/]7/S1 CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. fib:P: \120005 \12858 \ engineering \!2558- Dl.dwg Dale/Tiae91 /5/2002 10t47 AM Scaled" Y (WOLLASTON Xrel:. 412558 -b.Ewg COVERED TRUCK LOADING P GRAVEL ATH W/ CONCRETE P CURB GRANITE OUTCROP MAN UTTCROP PEA GRAVEL PATH W/ CONCRETE CURB PEA GRAVEL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 . WITH I MAN AND () 2 -3 MAN THERED GRANITE LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ARCHITECT. IMIIAIIiIwAliiUUiiNeni liniiiU IIIII ✓ 1:\ *.ti 1 c 1lQl� /iall a APPROX. LIMIT OF DRIPUNE PRUNE BACK TO TRUNK ANY BRANCHES CLOSER THEN 6 TO TOP or FENCE. PLANT SCHEDULE �� BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SYMBOL � TREES � ' ACER GRISEUM / PAPER BARK MAPLE ‘,�� r NKG0 BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD' / AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO - acr mr`u� ' 4,1�.�� ACER RUBRUU 'ARMSTRONG' / COUUANAR RED MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED' / AUTUMN BALZE MAPLE L MACROPHYLLUM / BIG LEAF MAPLE I BETULA PAPYRIFERA / PAPER BIRCH ACER ORONATUM / VINE MAPLE THUJA PUCATA / WESTERN RED CEDAR SHRUBS OSTUS X PURPUREUS / ORCHID ROCKROSE TAXUS 'DARK GREEN SPREADER' / SPREADING YEW BERBER'S THUNBERGII 'AUREA' / GOLDEN BARBERRY BERBER'S T. 'CRIMSON PYGMY / CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA 'ABBOSTSW000' / ONOUEFOIL SPIRAEA 'MAGIC CARPET / MAGIC CARPET SPIREA NANDINA DOMESTICA 'MOON BAY' / MOON BAY HEAVENLLY BAMBOO LEUCOTHOE FONTANESIANA 'SCARLETTA' / DROOPING LEUCOTHOE MAHONIA AOUIFODUM [COMPACT/3 OREGON GRAPE' CORNUS STOLONIFERA / RED - ONG DOGWOOD ` RUBUS SPECTABIUS / SALA4ONBERRY PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS / NINEBARK SYMPHORICARPOS ALBA / SNOWBERRY CORNUS STOLONIFERA KELSEYI' / DWARF REDTMG DOGWOOD PERENNIALS / GRASSES / FERNS EUPHORBIA CHARACIAS 'WULFENIF / EUPHORBIA PHORMIUM TENAX 'JACK SPRATT / DWARF NEW ZEALAND FLAX HEUCTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS / BLUE OAT GRASS POLYSTICUM MUNITUM / WESTERN SWORD FERN GROUNDCOVER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA -URSI / KINNIKINNICK FRAGARIA CHILOENSIS / BEACH STRAWBERRY LAWN EMERGENTS 75% JUNCOS EN9F000S / COMMON RUSH 258 SORPUS MICROCARPUS / SMALL- FRUITED BULRUSH 2`,CAL B&B 2' CAL B&B 2' CAL `L B&B 2' CAL B&B 2' CAL B&B' .` 2' CAL B&B ` 2" CAL B&B 8' HT. B&B MIN. 18" HT. CONT., 4' D.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MIN. 18" HT. CONT., 3' O.0 MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' 0.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' 0.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.0 MIN. 18" HT. CONT., 3' 0.0 MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' O.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' 0.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' 0.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' 0.C. MN. 18" HT. CONT., 3' O.C. GAL CONT, 3 D.C. GAL CONT., 3' D.C. GAL CONT., 3' O.C. GAL CONT. 1 GAL 24' 0.C. 4' POT 12' O.C. SOD SOD 4' POT 12" O.C. 4' POT 12' 0.C. NEW FENCE W/ PRI1 Y SLATt REFER TO SITE PLAN)) LEGEND TREE TYP - CAUPER1 DBH 1 P 1 EMS \ i C12 Cbm NG TREES T0'REMAIN NORWAY MAPLE AUSTRIAN BLACK PINE M DEOD TUUP B, PAPER BIRCH TREE TO BE REMOVED C COTTONWOOD WEATHERED GRANITE (REFER TO LANDSCAPE NOTES) WASHD RIVER ROCK MIN. 6' DEPTH PEA tIRAVEL MIN. 4' DEPTH EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. M D TYPE I LANDSCAPE S 180TH ST. 2 -3 MAN WEATHERE13 GRANITE (TYP.) v DRY RIVER BED LANDSCAPE PLAN = 20"-0" EXISTING MONUMENTI SIGN t = L) wv 4 -4 T P rin Terminal Saies Buliding 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 PPhone '206.720.2949 1az www.craftarchltects.com CONSULTANT ISSUE R&M= Sheet Ms Shod Ns 41111a41111.4 Z CO NO O o c o <w ° o > �, J V � LL1 co LA Me Planning Irrisastscm 1889090th I?. SE. Bm1 dI, WA 88012 phone (429417.1809 fix (479488x158 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA /SHORELINES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS LANDSCAPE PLAN Data 5/23/07 Deeipc CB Drams CB S Project Ns 746.00 Approve& C8 Oftbi drabs b a sera ansae amsAdl R asAead L -1 140 SAt9/01 46 - 4IO BARK MULCH EDGE OF BED GI (a riti a it ,..A Oriti r 0 AO 0 : 00,►4(i00.0►e00.00004s ►ioo , 00,0 OOOOOO•s o0011ea 00)OO 00000. O,0 0000.O�,U toOO'�OOOOOOOOOOi00 '2►dci00,00 O00 00000 ., 810000,00 .0000 �.J00'O_'00► X000000,0,0,00000 :•,s 000:04O e0 � t l 1 SPERRY `BUILDING PARC \,L "A" �.s O GROUND COVER SPACING VIES -..., i..` . 1 .___.,../.___.,,... ,- %.07 ‘11 X SPAON t- CURB OR HEADER NOTE: SPAaNG TO BE TITIANG. PER DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLANT SCHEDULE II IIIII o -- 'g =mDI= 111III= III111 =1 111111: � .,_uor= — 96: ,111 =1111 111 = 111111 -I IIIll= 111111= 111111= 111iii= 111111 111111 111111 °111111 = 111111 = 111111°1111 11111 -11111 O SHRUB PLANTING Nis SET CROWN AT NURSERY HEIGHT BARK MULCH PER SPECS BAC(FILL TO CONSIST OF TOPSOIL PER SPECS. ADD FERTIUZER PER SPECS SCARIFY ROOTBALL ON CONTAINER MATERIAL REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIAL PLANT TREES HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ROOTBALL 1 1 1. 1 1 \ l O DECIDUOUS TREE STAKING Nis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 PIT TO BE 2X 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN r = 20' -O" SECURE TRUNK WITH DOUBLE STRAND OF 14 GAUGE GALV. WIRE WRAPPED IN CLEAR VINYL TWIST TIGHT 2' DIA 'BYO LODGEPOLE PINE TREE STAKES 11TH 6' CONICAL POINT 36' DIA TREE WELLS IN LAWN AREAS. FILL WI111 2 OF SPECIFIED MULCH REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. LOOSEN WIRE BASKETS BACKFILL PIT WITH 50% TOPSOIL AND 50% NATIVE SOIL ADD SPECIFIED FERTIUZER TO MIX LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB ALL EXISTING BED AREAS SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW LANDSCAPE. 2. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS AND WITHIN PARKING LOT TO BE SET AT 8' MINUS FINISH ELEVATION EXCEPT AS NOTED. THESE AREAS TO RECEIVE IMPORTED TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8". ROTOTILLED THOROUGHLLY INTO SUBGRADE ALL EXISTING BEDS THAT ARE SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW PLANTING 10 BE PIT PLANTED 11TH A 50 /50 MIX OF EXISTING SUBGRADE AND IMPORTED TOPSOIL. 3. ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE FINE BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2'. EXISTING BEDS TO BE MULCHED AS NOTED. 4. AU. PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN SELECTED TO BE DROUGHT TOLERANT. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WATERING AS REOUIRED BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY OWNER 5. GROUND COVER TO EXTEND UNDER ALL DECIDUOUS TREE CANOPIES AT THE SPEARED SPACING TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE IN ALL PLANTING BEDS DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE GROUND COVER. GROUNDCOVER BENEATH EVERGREEN TREES TO BE MAINTAIN A 3' CLEARANCE FROM BASE OF TRUNK. 6. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARE BASED ON THE SITE PLANS PREPARED BY CRAFT ARCHITECTS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO THE SITE PLANS WHICH MAY REQUIRE ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN. 7. REFER TO OVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT 111E HEALTH OF PLANT MATERIAL 8. NO PRE - EMERGENT HERBICIDES TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SITE DURING THE FIRST YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. 9. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE BOULDERS TO BE PLACED IN PLANTING BEDS AS NOTED. BOULDERS TO BE SET INTO THE SUBGADE AND POSIIONED THAT ALL EXPOSED SIDES OF THE BOULDER SLOPES DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF BOULDER. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE ARE AVAILABLE AT MARENAKO'S ROCK CENTER PRESTON, WASHINGTON. PHONE (425 - 392 -3313) WASHED RIVER R00( 1 -6" DIA. TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 4' CONCRETE WALK CRUSHED SUBBASE FOR WALK NOTE ROC( OUTCROP TO CONSIST OF WEATHERED GRANITE 2 -3 MAN SET ROC( WA1H ALL EXPOSED SIDES SLOPING OUT AND AWAY FROM TOP OF ROC( O ROCK OUTCROP DETAIL Nis CONCRETE CURB ASPHALT PAVING WEATHERED GRANITE 2 -3 MAN BUILDING WALL ROCKS TO BE SET FIRM AND WITHIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE AN APPROX. 1/3 OF THE ROCK MASS TO BE SET BELOW GRADE FOR SETTING ROCK. REMOVE ADDITIONAL ASPHALT AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL IRRIGATION HEADS ADJACENT TO CURB O ISLAND PLANTING DETAIL Nis ESTABUSH CROWN AS INDICATED SOD OR MULCH PER PLAN 5% _ 5% 500-0' MULCH -1' IMPORT TOPSOIL AS SPECIFIED REMOVE CRUSHED TOP COURSE AS INDICATED. SCARIFY EXISTING SUBGRADE TO DEPTH OF 6' AND BACKRLL WITH IMPORT TOPSOIL PER SPEOF1CATTONS CRUSHED TOP COURSE a r c h ' C Reirr t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 4013 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2919 taz www.cratta'chi tect s.com z CD O CD CC LL (f) J J CONSULTANT Larcitioge Architecture Ate Aiming !name loth Dr. SE. Batten. WA 98012 phme 1420 417-4M9 fax WS 488.156 ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA/SHOREUNES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Sheet 19181 LANDSCAPE RAN Dots 5/18/07 Dedpc Drees C8 Project Not 746.00 Nome* Ce oUd ekarlo r Br a ar Jed. rase Each R eaAsead L -2 Sheet Na O Z H� O Q CL O N U 03 (D g lm VOW 746-810 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION P.S.I. RAD. G.P.M. 1 CLASS 200 RAIN BIRD 1812 - SAM- MP3000 360, 12" POP -UP ROTOR 50 UP TO 26 G.P.M. CO d0 00 NvNN 08 4th 0�OO 0 G 0 0 RAIN BIRD 1812 - SAM- MP3000 90 -210, 12" POP -UP ROTOR 50 RAIN BIRD 1812 - SAM- MP3000 90 -210, 12" POP -UP ROTOR 50 RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP2000 360, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP2000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP2000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM- MP1000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 in RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP1000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM -MP CORNER, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM -MP SIDE STRIP, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM -MP RIGHT STRIP, 6' POP -UP SPRAY 50 RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM -MP LEFT STRIP, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 50 f r m RAIN BIRD 1804 -SAM (NOZZLE AS NOTED ABOVE), 4" POP -UP SPRAY 1" IRRIGATION METER (REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS) POINT OF CONNECTION : 1 1 -1/2 BRASS GATE VALVE 1 FEBCO ROSY, 1 -1/2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY 1 1" RAINBIRD 44RC, 1" QUICK COUPUNG VALVE ZONE NUMBER 1 RAINBIRD 150 PEB, 1 -1/2" MASTER VALVE 1 RAIN BIRD 100- PEB -PRS, 1" REMOTE CONTROL VALVE EU G.P.M. RAIN BIRD XCZ- 075 -PRF, 3/4" DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT RAIN BIRD EMT- 6XERI, DRIP 6 OUTLET MANIFOLD 11511 VALVE SIZE RAIN BIRD ESP -12MC, FOUR PROGRAM HYBRID CONTROLLER WALL MOUNT W/ RAIN BIRD MSC, WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR 1 1/2" MAINLINE, SCHEDULE 40 PVC CLASS 200 PVC LATERAL UNE (SIZE PER PIPE SIZING TABLE) 4" SLEEVING, SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE SIZING TABLE PIPE SIZE MAX G.P.M. 3/4" CLASS 200 UP TO 10 C.P.M. 1 CLASS 200 UP TO 16 G.P.M. 1 -1/4" CLASS 200 UP TO 26 G.P.M. HAND TRENCH FOR MAINLINE IN THESE AREA. TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN l'iJ!F4!yrt�F'�� 100,1111111=InFall„.. "m" • 1 a.c I 1vc 1 I ! ai EXISTING CHAIN LINK — 1 1P FENCE TO REMAIN` / �I � • • • HAND TRENCH WITHIN DRIPUNE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. IRRIGATION NOTES 0 1. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMM OF WORK. PROTECT ALL NEW AND EXISTING UTILITIES. PROMPTLY N THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFUCT BETWEEN PROPOSED WOR AND OBSTRUCTIONS. 2 IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY, PERSONS, WORK IN PROGRESS, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, WALKS, CURBS, PAVED SURFACES AND EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO REMAIN DURING THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORK. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTIU11ES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK AND PROTECT SAID UTIUTIES 3. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND FEES AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES FOR THIS WORK. ALL WORK TO BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS AND MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS. 4. PRESSURIZE MAINLINE TO 100 P51 FOR A PERIOD OF 2 HOURS CHECK ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS FOR LEAKS AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT A PRESSURE TEST HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITH NO MORE THAN 5 PSI LOSS DURING THE TEST DURATION. 5. UPON THE COMPLETION OF IRRIGATION WORK, OPERATE THE SYSTEM IN THE PRESENCE OF 1HE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. ADJUST AS REQUIRED. 6. GUARANTEE ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR COMMENCING AT THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE THIS GUARANTEE DOES NOT APPLY TO WORK OR DAMAGE DONE TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM BY OTHERS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 7. PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE PROVIDE 1HE OWNER VAIN A SET OF CLEARLY DRAWN REPRODUCIBLE RECORD DRAWINGS SHOWING ACTUAL LOCATION AND TYPE OF IRRIGATION ELEMENTS INSTALLED. 1 18 1' S 180TH ST. DRY RIVER BED IRRIGATION PLAN 1" = 20' -0" POINT OF CONNECTION If LLJ CC CC W 0 (1) a r c h , CR/Tr t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206 - 720.2949 tax www. crattarchitects. com Z CD (n o Z 00 O 0 c° Q Ct I- Q W J V 00 W CONSULTANT ISSUE Redolent Sheen 1186 144YrIa�1 0 L A 16893905 Dr. SE. BoOd(WA 98012 phone I 417 -4609 fax 1429 486 -156 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA /SHORELINES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS IRRIGATION PLAN Dots 5/23/07 DIAP t8 Draws 03 Project Mc 746.00 Axiom* CB • Silo ■nw ee slel a rase Sheet Ns L-3 1® 5/09/G7 16 -4t0 GATE VALVE MAIN SHUT OFF 0 ■ LJ WI UPI WILKENS P.R.V. IF REQUIRED. DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMB III = 111111 = 111111 = 111111 °JP� 1 11111 = = G! 11- 111111 —TIIMI `=111111 =1111 \ I L a ! :. \ • i•±lia;iir[ 19:iIIIKA1i:C; lemiii ii 1 EMIIIW= 111111 -111 '111111 = 111111= 1- 111111 -1 1 SCH 80 PVC UNION (TYP.) NOTE 1. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS WITHIN VAULT TO BE ONE SIZE LARGER THEN COMPONENTS. USE REDUCING BUSHINGS. 3. TEST COOKS SHALL HAVE 12' CLEARANCE O POINT OF CONNECTION 1415 QUICK COUPLER VALVE VALVE BOX. REFER TO NOTE #5 MASTER VALVE WASHED DRAIN ROCK MINIMUM 12" DEPTH (TYP.) FLOW 4. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH CITY OF EVERETT STANDARDS. REVIEW CURRENT CITY STANDARDS FOR REVISIONS 5. FOR 3/4" & 1' DEVICES, CARSON JUMBO BOXES FOR 1 -1/2' & 2' DEVICES, INSTALL FOG 111E p REINFORCED CONCRETE BOXES O Nis Lt.; ;mom 0.1711 � 1 FINISHED GRADE BEFORE MULCH /SOD 1' ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3M DRY SPUCE CONNECTORS PROVIDE FOR A 18' EXPANSION LOOP OF EXCESS IMRE. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE PLASTIC ISOLATION BALL VALVE SAME SIZE AS CONTROL VALVE CARSON STANDARD VALVE BOX FOR 1" OR 1 -1/4" VALVES CARSON JUMBO VALVE BOX FOR 1 -1/2' OR 2' VALVES VAULT TO EXTEND MIN. 6' BELOW VALVE. USE EXTENSIONS AS NEEDED. MASONARY UNIT SUPPORT AT CORNERS SCH 40 PVC MAINUNE PEA GRAVEL MIN. 3" DEPTH NOTE 1. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS WITHIN VAULT TO BE SCH 40 PVC SAME SIZE AS OUTLET LATERAL PIPE 3. PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE CONNECTION IN VALVE BOX. 4. COMPACT SOIL AROUND VALVE BOX TO SAME DENSITY AS UNDISTURBED ADJACENT SOIL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 1 IRRIGATION PLAN 1' a 20' -O" COMPACT SUBGRADE PER BACKFILL & TRENCHING SPECIFICATIONS PAVING O SLEEVING & TRENCHING DETAIL NIS AS SPECIFIED BACKFILL PVC SCH. 40 SLEEVING MIN. 2X DIA OF ENCLOSED PIPE 2" PVC SCH. 40 WIRE SLEEVE NOTE BACKFILL TO BE FREE OF ROCK OR DEBRIS LARGER THAN 1' DIA. ABSOLUTELY NO ROCK OR DEBRIS SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO ANY PIPE I II= 11111 = 1111 " "' - 111111 = 111111 111 - 111111= _ 111111 = 111111= 111111 - 111111 111 = 111111= =111111° TOPSOIL PVC LATERAL PVC MAIN VALVE WIRING FINISHED GRADE SET POP -UP SPRINKLER FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE POP -UP SPRINKLER HEAD. REFER TO IRRIGATION SCHEDULE FOR NOZZLE AND BODY TYPE. USE BOTTOM INLET ONLY. POLY PIPE 30' MAX. LENGTH SOH 40 PVC FITTINGS, TYP. MARLEX STREET ELL AND SWING PIPE 90 LATERAL TYP. SIZE AS INDICATED ON PLAN MARLEX STREET ELL AND SWING PIPE 90 NOTE 1. USE BOTTOM INLET ONLY. 2. POLY PIPE TP BE USED FOR SPRAY HEADS ONLY. ROTORS AND MP ROTATOR HEADS SHALL USE A TRIPLE SUING ASSEMBLY. 3. HEADS TO BE SET PERPENDICULAR WITH SLOPE. O POP -UP SPRAY HEAD NTS FINISHED GRADE BEFORE MULCH /SOD 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE CARSON 10" ROUND VAULT WITH LOCKING LID QUICK COUPLER VALVE SET A MINIMUM 2' CLEAR BELOW TOP OF VAULT. STEEL 'T FENCE POST, 36' LENGTH SS HOSE CLAMP (2) SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE SCH 40 PVC ST ELL & 90 DEG. ELL NOTE: 1. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2. VALVE TO BE SET PLUM & CENTERED IN VALVE BOX. 3. PROVIDE DRAIN ROCK TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6'. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (1) EACH QCV KEY AND SWIVEL HOSE ELL O QUICK COUPLER VALVE SCH 40 PVC ST. ELL SCH 80 PVC NIPPLE, 1' X 12" LENGTH SCH 40 PVC MAIN UNE CRArr a r c h i t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 fax www.craftarchitects.com CONSULTANT Landscape Architecture Stte Rams/ irrigation 1668060thDr && Bothell WA 98012 cheae(4 4174809 to 4429488-155 ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA SHORELINES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Sheet This IRRIGATION PUN Dabs 5/18/07 Deka CS Drum CB Project Ns 74640 MOW babe Y tor e !da eeeEI R sAsA SheetNe L- 4 100 5/09/07 746 -810 mum 0 rar/K11 ® ENLARGED PLAN 1/8' • 1 -0' o 1 2 5 wsssw raa TOE OF SLOPE ■ TOP OF LEVY GREENRNE1 14' -0' TeKt! +/- Cr FACE 0•1 Iwo 10 !4�W 7'9N' §NUnL'_kN4 'kn'tkre'k�xynttk�xynwk ® ARCHITECTURAL SITE SECTION 1 /18'•P -0' ox 4 to m +41' T.O. CMU WALL 7 — GROUND O SO. Rif .,lawwre SOK mac KEY NOTES: O EXIST. CHAIN UNK FENCE TO REMAIN, EXTEND BOTTOM OF FENCE 18' BELOW GROUND (ANCHORED AT BASE). ADD PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER. O NEW 8' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK VINYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER TO MATCH EXISTING, EXTEND BOTTOM OF FENCE 18' BELOW GROUND (ANCHORED AT BASE). O NEW 10' HIGH ELECT. ROWNG GATE WITH INTERWOVEN SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, REMOTE OPERATION O NEW 10' -0' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK VINYL COLOR WITH PRNACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, ANCHORED AT BASE NEW CHAIN UNK GATE W/ LOCK EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN. NEW LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION RESEAL & RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING NEW ASPHALT, EXTRUDED CURB & STRIPING EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN NEW CONC. SIDEWALK W/ BROOM FINISH & 5 SCORING PATTERN NEW PEA GRAVEL PTD STEEL, CONC. FILLED BOLLARDS REFER ALSO TO DETAIL 14/8.1. NEW ENTRY PEDESTAL (INTERCOM) NEW 10' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE BLACK VINYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER AND INTERWOVEN SLATS, ANCHORED AT BASE WATER AND IRRIGATION METERS TRANSFORMER; REFER TO A2.1 FOR PAD INFORMATION. GENERATOR; REFER TO A2.1 FOR PAD INFORMATION. GAS METER. LOCATE TO READ METER THROUGH FENCE. ALL EXPOSED PIPING TO BE LOCATED BEHIND FENCE. 0 0 0 PARCEL "C" GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROPOSED BUILDING AND SURROUNDING SITE WILL NOT HAVE ANY NEW SIGNAGE QO NEW CURB RAMP PER 406 ON SHEET T1.2 AND DETAILS 17 & 18/A8.1. NEW SIGNAGE PER 502 /503 ON SHEET 11.2 AND DETAIL 16/A8.1 I VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL PER 502/503 ON SHEET 11.2 CAR ACCESSIBLE STALL PER 502/503 ON SHEET 11.2 ACCESS AISLE PER 502 /503 ON SHEET T1.2 MAIN ENTRANCE NEW BIKE RACK, DOUBLE BEND. CAPACITY (4). STANDARD PARKING STALL NEW CONC. PAD NEW 10' -0' HIGH STEEL ORNAMENTAL FENCE BLACK NEW STEEL ORNAMENTAL GATE, BLACK W /LOCK NEW ASPHALT PATHWAY 5' -0' WIDE 5'-0' FROM FENCE NEW STRIPING ON ASPHALT FOR PEDESTRIAN PATH FENCED TURN - AROUND COVERED TRUCK LOADING — r� S 180TH ST PROPOSED BUILDING PARCEL T' EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING - SPERRY PARCEL "A" UTILITY EASEMENT PARCEL "B" PHASE 2 PARKING LOT 56 PARKING STALLS 1 1 Il 1 1 1 11 1 1I QARCH ITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1'•40' -0' 0 10 20 40 CRArr a r c h 1 t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 fas www. craftarchltects.tom CONSULTANT rr•e■1rmni z m 5 Ftgl c o > J U REGISTERED ARCHITECT CQCOPflafifir CRAFT ARCHIEC18 2007.11.E8E DOCUIB118 MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITH OUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PHON BY CRAFT ARWTECTS OR WE118 FARGO. ISSUE 1609.07 SITE RE9t1BMITTAL Revisions: Sheet Title: ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Dote: 11/09/07 Design: JAKB Drown: Project No: Approved: Sheet No: MLR,SN 746.00 KC Original drawing is 24' . 36'. Scale entities occordinaIv if reduced A1.0 COVyWGM CRM MGBIECIS 2007 60' -0' KEY NOTES: <> P -LAM COUNTER W/ BASE & UPPER CABINETS 0 34' A.F.F., TYP. O P -LAM COUNTER 0 36' A.F.F., TYP. REFER TO SHEET A7.2, DETAIL j8 OPEN WORK AREA, TYP., FURNITURE F.0.1.0 ROOF HATCH & PTD. STEEL LADDER PLASTIC LAMINATE STORAGE CABINETS, 7' -0' H LOCKERS -LYON. 12". x 18'd, 2 -TIER, RD OR SIMILAR, STANDARD AKD PAINT COLOR, FCIC T LOCKERS -LYON, 12 "w x 24'd, FULL-HT., FCIC 6 RELIT., TYP. REFER TO DOOR AND RELITE SCHEDULE ON SHT A3.1. SEE 10,11/A3.2 FOR DETAILS. $ MODULAR 6 SIDED VAULT, PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER IO PTD. WD DOOR W/ HM FRAME, TYP. SEE SCHEDULE ON SHT A3.1 AND DETAILS ON SHT A3.2 NOT IN USE CATCH BASIN W/ OIL WATER SEPARATOR PER CML 12' CONTINUOUS WALL BUMPERS, MTD 0 30' AFF, TO BOTTOM, THIS WALL U.N.O., FCIC WAINSCOT, THIS WALL U.N.O. - REFER TO 6B /A7.2 FOR DETAILS. 4 -0" HIGH STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARD 4 -0" HIGH STAINLESS STEEL WRAP FULL-HT. GWB OVER HAT CHANNEL, WRAP. FULL HT. ADJ. SHELVING, REFER TO 5/A7.2 MOP SINK WALL MOUNT 26' TELEVISION, FCIC FULL-SIZE REFER. WITH ICE MAKER BY GEN. ELEC. OR EQUAL. FCIC 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 ! 1 165 -0' 2000 WATT MICRO, FCIC VENDING MACHINE. F010 WATER COOLER, F010 FURNISH & INSTALL 3/4 PTD. F1RE -RATED PLYWOOD ON ALL WALLS STAINLESS STEEL COUNTER 0 36' AFF WALL MOUNTED HOOKS U.C. REFRIGERATOR, FCIC GARBAGE DISPOSAL, FCIC. P LAM SIGN-IN COUNTER: 34' 11 AIR SPACE BETWEEN EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANEL AND INTERIOR MODULAR VAULT PANEL TACK BOARD: 48" W, ALUMINUM FRAME WHITE BOARD: 48" W, ALUMINUM FRAME DOCUMENTS PASS - THROUGH TRAY, 16' W. LOCATION OF RED /GREEN ALL SAFE' LIGHTS WALL MOUNTED ABOVE DOOR ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PER CML & MEP, ON CONCRETE PAD I BACK UP GENERATOR PER MEP, ON CONCRETE PAD. BOLLARDS. TYPICAL (4) 4' PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALL, 12' ABOVE CEILING. PROVIDE AND INSTALL HOOKS FOR HANGING COUMER BAGS - (4) WALL MOUNTED HOOKS MOUNTED TO 104 BOARD, MOUNTED TO WALL AT 36' AFF. PAINT TO MATCH WALL COLOR. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING COLUMN, EXTERIOR WALLS, WINDOWS, AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TO REMAIN. 2. ALL NEW PARTITION WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE U.O.N. REFER TO A3.3 FOR WALL TYPES. 3. FOR EGRESS AND ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE REFER TO SHEET T1.3 4. SEE A6.1 & A6.2 FOR ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS. 5. LEGEND NEW WALL -� HOSE BIBB FLOOR DRAIN 11 PROVIDE AND INSTALL SHEET METAL BACKING (6' WIDE 20 GAUGE FLAT STRAP) AT ALL WALL MOUNTED ELEMENTS (EQUIPMENT, CASEWORK, ETC.) SIM - NO CEILING 12' -5" 10' -3 1/ maim r " 39 -7 1/2' 2 -4 1/2" 12' -10" 20' -6" 7 -0' 3 ." 12 -0 1/2' 12' -10 3/4' WALLS THIS ROOM 51 -6 3/4' 3'- 3'6' -5 1/2 Sheet Title: Dote: Design: Drown: Q FLOOR 2 PLAN 0 4 16 FT Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Site 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 fax www. craftarchltec 66.com CONSULTANT MSi COPYRITT CRAFT ARCHTECTS 2007. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WIN OUT EXfiiESS WMTB1 PERMSSON BY CRAFT ARCHTECTS OR WELLS FAROO. ISSUE 11.09.07 8(T7_ RESUBMITTAL Revisions Project No: Approved Sheet No: •,re•.,v. z m �, o Z 0 CC g LL c pw CO 0 J W REGISTERED ARCHITECT COPYRIGHT CRAFT ARCHITECTS 2007 15/09/27 JAKE MLR,SN 746.00 KC Driginol droning is 24 . 36 Scote entities occordingly A reduced A2.1 KEY NOTES O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 S 0 • 0 NEW SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DRIVE-IN DOOR NEW HM 4AND00R W/ STEEL FRAME, TYP PAINTED TILT -UP CONC. PANEL, TYP. PANEL JOINT, 1YP. FUTURE KNOCK OUT, IYP. PAINTED MIL COPING 1/2' DEEP REVEAL, TYP FORMED N 3' -O x 3' -0' GRID 6' HIGH P1D. MEL TOP CAP PRECAST CONC. TOP CAP KLA-ALL 8RK2( WALL 6.8't12' MOJAVE / MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE KLA -ALL BRICK WALL 4'x8't12' MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE KLA-ALL BRICK FACE 4'x4'x12' MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE KU -ALL BRICK FACE 4'44 %12' MOJAVE / MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE. PRE - ENGINEERED METAL STRUCTURE: PREF1NISHED METAL ROOF, PANTED METAL FLASHING, PRE -ENGINEERED METAL STRUCTURE: PEI) STEEL COLUMNS PTD STEEL CANOPY W/ PTO METAL DECK 1/2' DEEP REVEAL 1YP SCUPPER & DOWNSPOUT, TIGHIUNE PER CIVIL MECHAOICAL SCREEN ON ROOF BEYOND CONT. GUFIER W/ DS., TIGHTUNE PER CML ROOF UNE BEYOND CONTROL JOINT SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP. DECORATIVE METAL PANEL PAINTED DARK BRONZE NEW 10' HIGH ELECT. ROWING GATE WITH INTERWOVEN BATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, REMOTE OPERATION ® NEW 10'4 HIGH CHAIN UM( FENCE BUCK VINYL COLOR ICH PRIVACY SLATS AND 0U1WARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER ANCHORED AT BASE. 2P GENERAL NOTES 1. GLAZING TYPE IG TYP., U.O.N. 2. ' INDICATES TIG TEMPERED INSULATED GLAZING TYP. 3 ALL GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED W /ITS MAX U- FACTOR OF 0.90 & SOLAR HUT GAIN CO- EFFIIENT OF 1.0 BY AN INDEPENOANT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC. 4 PROPOSED BUILDING WILL 0401 HAVE ANY NEW SIGNAGE PAINT / MATERIAL LEGEND PN1 - 1: RESTRAINED GOLD (SW6129, FN130) PINT - 2: NETSUKE (SW6134, F14135) PN1 - 3: CAFE OLE (BM 2098 -40) KU -ALL BRICK MOJAVE MSSION TEXTURE (MUTUAL INTERVALS) KU -ALL BRI2( MAUNA WE MISSION TEXTURE (MUTUAL MATERIALS) METAL COLOR -1 DARK BRONZE METAL COLOR - 2 COLONIAL RED O WEST ELEVATION „R .,-0 0 15' -0' 0 12' -7' i O 33' -1' 0 21' -10' O EAST a ELEVATION O WEST ELEVATION Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 pnone 206.720.2949 lax www. c rattarchitects.com CONSULTANT CQCOPYRIOFR CRAFT ARCHSECTB 2007. TF$E DOCUMENTS WAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITH OUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERVESION BY CRAFT AACHTECTB OR WELLS FARGO. ISSUE 1t09.07 SITE RESUBIATTAL Revisions: Sheet Title Date: Design Drown:. Project No: Approved: Original drawing le 2( s sr. Scale melee pecord'uaN R reduced Sheet No: AdIradlaa/ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COPYRIGHT CRAFT ARCHITECTS 2007 11/D9/07 JAKE MLR,SN 746.00 KC A4.1 LAME: TDC Annex LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE TAG SIZE/ DESCRIPTION LAMP INFORMATION BALLAST DESCRIPTION TOTAL VA MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER VOLT MOUNTING REMARKS TYPE QTY DESCRIPTION DA FWO 1 268 OTT 3500K. 80 + CS (1) 1-4A1P ELECTRONIC BALLAST 28 GCTHAM PORT OU0 if 1/28 NT TAR 120 GIN 10 06128 E. 6251 U 120 RECESSED RECESSED 0P01 REFLECTOR DOWNUCHT WITH 6' APERAIURE. CEILING GA RECESS. 086ECT/INDIRECT Y X 4' UJWMWtE FLUO 2 F032 T8 3500. 80 + C I (1) 2-LAMP ELECTRONIC BMIAST 82 UTHOMA METALL& 2AV 0 232 MDR 120 0E81010 2 Rd 232 RP 120V 0881 120 RECESSED CEILING HA SURFACE MOUNTED. 4' GENERAL PURPOSE STRP LUMINAIRE FLUO 2 F032 T8 350011. BO + CIF (1) 2-LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 62 UTHONIA METALUX C 232 120 09106 6S 232 120M 6881 120 SURFACE C7LDNO KA COUNO MOUNTED. GARAGE FIXTURE WITH SUCONE GI4(E71NC, EXTRUDED ALUMINUM HOUSING W(1H ARCHITECTURAL CLASS I MIODIZNG. PS101 1 40014 PULSE START METAL HALIDE 4000. 75+ CRI (1) 1 CAMP NMI POWER FACTOR BALLAST 430 GARDCO SCBEH19 0 400P31111 208 8LA 208 SURFACE CEILING LA1 SUSPENDED, LINEAR S -INDIRECT 4 LUYIIMRE PLO 2 F032 1W 3500. 80 + d6 (1) 2-AMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 62 PEERLESS COREUTE 10 CAM 7232 met 120 400610 DCr LP835 F1/24' SCEP AZ WP21120120 AC 24' 11 CMET 120 SUSPENDED Cf3JNG LA2 SUSPENDED. UNEIR SEMI - INDIRECT 8' LUMINAIRE FWO 4 F032 T8 35000. 80 + d0 (1) 2 -LAID ELECTRONIC BALLAST 124 PEERLESS COREIJIE 10 dN 7232 WIN 120 00810 DCT 0835 F1/24' SCEP AZ WP2782C120 AC 24' T1 MET 120 SUSPENDED MDNG MA1 WALL MOUNTED. 4 VANITY LASNAIRE FLUO 1 F032 T8 35007. 80 + (26 (1) 1 -LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 32 UTIOHOA METALUX WC 1 32 120 (,.7:13106 BC 132 120V E881 120 SURFACE WALL MA2 WALL MOUNTED. r VANRY WEMAIRE FLUO 1 F017 T8 3500X, 80 + 016 (1) 1-LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 22 UTNOHA METAUJX RTC 1 17 120 OEB70S BC 117 1204/ EMT 120 SURFACE WALL SA SINGLE HEAD. CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED WY8NRE DE CAST ALUMNA HOUSING. ANODIZED ALUIONW REFLECTOR AND TEMPERED GLASS LENS PSMN 1 4006 PULSC START METAL NUDE 4000K, 75+ CM (1) 1 -LAMP 10014 POWER FACTOR BALLAST 410 CAROCO EI19- 1- 4X- 400PSIM 208 POLE AT 25' 121 SB1 DOUBLE NM CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED UA0NAINE DIE CAST ALMWJM HOUSING. ANODIZED ALUMINUM REFLECTOR AND TEMPERED GLASS LIDS. P5114 2 4008 PULSE START METAL 11AI1DE 4000. 75+ CB (2) 1 -UWP 1110M POWER FACTOR BALLAST 820 0*8000 0119- 2- 4X- 400PSIM 208 POLE AT 25 121 SB2 DOUBLE HEAD. CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED WWWYRE WTIH ROTATED OPTICS. MIN 2 400W PULSE START METAL 81110E 4000K, 75+ CM (2) 1 -LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 820 GARDCO 13119- 2- 4X-400PSWR 208 POLE AT 2 ' 121 SC TRIPLE HEAD, CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE MN HEADS SEPARATED P901 3 4008 PULSE START MEDAL MAUDE 40007. 75+ C0 (3) 1 -LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 1230 QARDCO 0119 -3 /ED 208 AT POLE 25 821 BY 90 DEGREES. SD1 WALL MOUNTED. WIDE THROW AREA UNSNARL, DE GIST ALUMINUM NOISING. COMPLETELY SEALED AND QA90:TED. MN ' 1 179N METAL HALIDE 400011, 75+ OO (1) 1 -LAPP HOH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 205 CAR000 101 Wr 1751174 208 SURFACE WALL 11) SD2 WALL MOUNTED. FORWARD THROW AREA LUMNSRE. DIE CAST ALMINUM HOUSING. COMPLETELY STALED AND G SKSTED. FAH 1 - 1758 METAL HALIDE 4000K. 75+ CM (1) 1 -LAMP 16CM POWER FACTOR BALLAST 205 QARDCO 101 FT 175101 208 SURFACE WALL ITI SD3 CUTOFF 100-- WALLPMDIL LA. LISTED FOR WET LOCATIONS. TUX) 1 268 Mr ELECTROOC 10014 POWER FACTOR 28 MONA T8AC- 26075 -120 120 WALL 11) X UNIVERSAL MOUNTED LED DOT SHIN WTIH GREEN LEI TEARS LED 1 OREEN LED 120 V POWER SUPPLY 3 MANN IE SERIES 120 VARIES GENERAL NOTES: LUMINAIRE REMARKS: A PRODUCT NUMBERS SHOWN ARE ASSOCIATED WRH THE FIRST MANUFACNRER LISTED ON THE LUMINAIRE 5C EDULE FOR EACH L7IMNAOE TYPE ALL OTHER 111 REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL 0EVA71d6 TO CONFIRM MOUNTING HEIGHTS. NFORM DOWER OF LISTED MANUFACTURERS ARE APPROVED BUT MUST MEET ALL FEC10DI94TS OF SPECIFIED ITEM. CONTRACOR TO SUBMIT CRSHFEIS OF ALTERNATE AND CONFLICTS. 121 SEE POLE DETAIL 2/EB.1. APPROVED MANUFACTURERS PRODUCT ALONG WITH CUTSHES1S OF SPEaRED FIXTURE FOR MIN C. CONTRACT TO VFA1FY CEILING AND FRONDE US PARE APPROVAL I047)(1 man & BRACKETS FOR ALL FIXTURE TYPES 0. CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY SINGLE OR DOUBLE FACE AND MOUNTING OF EXIT SKIS WITS LIGHTING PLANS AND AROKREC1URAL 0017)40 PLANS AND PROVIDE WALL MOIINTIG BRACKETS. CE7IDNG MOUNTING BRACKETS 810 /of POm1HTS AS REQUIRED E N LOCATIONS WHERE DUCT WORK RUNS OVER TIE TOP OF RECESSED LUMINANDL THE LUMINARIES AT THESE LOCATIONS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY SUPPORTED TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUCT PENETRATIONS. LUMINAIRES ARE TO BE SUPPORTED BY THE =NC SYSTEM OR BUILDING STRUCTURE ONLY F. ALL SUSPENDED LINEAR WYINNtES TO BE EQUIPPED WITS WHITE POWER CHORD PROJECT: TOC ANRIN ECT LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL SCHEDULE LOGOIOHE UM ELECTRICAL Re011 LCP-A 1129/67 11A0 PM RELAY PANEL LOAD DESCRIPTION ON /OFF CONTROL PROGRAMM NG REMARKS TAG NO. NAME CKT. SWEEP LS PC—ON PC —OFF TC —ON TC —OFF OS 1 5L1A 38 CORRIDOR LIGHTING 1&0044 X X 2 SLU* 39 OPEN OFFICE 12700AM X X 3 SLIA 41 OPEN OFFICE 1200411 X X 4 SL1A 37 OPEN OFFICE 12700AM X X 5 SL1A 35 OPEN OFFICE 124OAM X X 8 SL1A 2 EXTERIOR UGHTIO X X 7 4 B SL1A 6 DONOR LIGMTNG X X 9 8 10 MIA 7 0*EROR MIMIC X X 11 9 12 SL1A 11 DONOR LIGHTING X X 13 13 14 SL1A 15 EXTERIOR LLGHTINC X X 15 17 18 SL18 57 0CLEROR LIONT810 X X 17 59 18 SPARE 19 SPARE 20 SPATE 21 SPACE 22 SPACE 23 SPACE 24 I SPACE 25 SPACE 28 SPACE 27 SPACE 28 SPACE 29 SPAM 30 SPACE 31 SPACE 32 SPACE LEGEND. IC= TIME CLOCK, PLO- PHOTOCELL, 0:r OCCUPANCY SENSOR AUX CONTACT, LS- LOCAL SWITCH GENERAL NOTES: REMARKS: A SYSTEM IS DESIGNED AROUND PC 1t10CEEPER 32. I11 B. SWOP OFF 701E NOTED S THE 171E TO START THE SWEEP. R SHALL REDC0IUR EVERT TWO HOURS UNTIL 47001111 121 C. PRO ICE 32 RELAY ENCLOSURE SIZE WITH 20 RELAYS [SMALLS 134 et C RtErr a r c h i t e c t s I•minal tales X111 rlin9 1932 First Avenue SL'te 408 . %aa'T e, WA 44101 itlh /J 214,11 r none 206.72 =9 Pz• www. c rafta rc hitects .corn Project No: Approved: CONSULTANT C,LUMAC ewm a sox. t341222Rp F.3miT..1f1. rm 207,12001A bmm J. FERCUSON - . 481a ver 11.09.07 SUE RESUBUMAL Sheet Title: BEcrwiC,V. 9043 TES Dote: II/ /01 Design: ,OF Drawn: .jr 209'0001AA Sheet Na: E0.1 0PramHT02007 1WMAC ELECTRICAL SERVICE \ RESPONSIBILITY \ UTILITY CONTRACTOR \ CO. PROVIDES TRENCHING & BACKFILL X PRIMARY CONDUITS X SECONDARY CONDUIT X PRIMARY CONDUCTORS X SWB UNE S1DE SECONDARY CONDUCTORS X TRANSFORMER (MO X UTX PAD/ VAULT X UTX CONNECTIONS X PRIMARY GROUNDING X CT ENCLOSURE X CT's X METER BASE x METER X METER GROUNDING X SECONDARY CONDUCTORS X \ UTILITY CONTACTS NOTES; . 1. CONTACT AND COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH SERVING UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BIDS 2. ALL SERVICE INSTALLATION WORK SHALL BE IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SERVING UTILITY. 3. GLUMAC HAS CONTACTED THE UTILITIES BUT HAS NOT RECEIVED IN WRITING THE FINAL REQUIREMENTS FROM THE POWER UTILITY, TELEPHONE UTILITY OR THE CAW UTILITY. THESE DRAWINGS INDICATE OUR BEST ESTIMATION OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTACT THE UTILITIES AND OBTAIN IN WRITING THEIR REQUIREMENTS TELEPHONE UTILITY CONTACT; . . OWEST PHONE (206) 224 -1146 POWER UTILITY CONTACT; PUGET SOUND ENERGY 3130 S. 38Th STREET TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98409 PHONE: (425) 452 -1234 FAX: (253) 476 -6007 CABLE T.V. UTILITY (CAN) CONTACT; COMCAST PHONE (800) 266 -2278 \ \ \ Tow NEW BUILDING sp 501 SD1 SD1 SDI _ SDI DOSITNG BUILDING ( TOC) \ \ \ \ \ - - 1 SDI 1 5D2 (1) 4%. SD2 1 502 O O (1) 2 (I) 4'C. 501 501 SDI 5 501 501 501 1 501 501 5D1 , 1 IJI ©L III \ \ \ \ SOUTH 1BOTH Sr \ \ LCP —A -6,7 O ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SCALE 1 - .20' 0 13261 2 285M1 40' I. 11 VI� C �r \ \ LCP — 8,9 \ 582 SDI .0000°°°'• 501 5D1 SO1 501 0 501 GENERAL NOTES SD1 501 5B2 A. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDmONAL INFORMATION. ALL DETAILS APPLY FOR APPLICABLE SITUATIONS WHETHER REFERENCED ON THE PLAN OR NOT. SDI 5D1 SDI S01 8. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDMONAL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR SITE LUMINAIRES. C. ALL SITE POWER SHALL BE MINIMUM #10 WIRE IN 3/4'C. SHEET NOTES 1. SEE 1/56.0 FOR ATS FEEDER SIZES. SEE 1 /58.0 FOR ACCESSORY CIRCUITS AND CONTROLS. 2. SEE 1 /E6.0 FOR SECONDARY FEEDER SIZE. 3. PROVIDE FDCTURE WITH BODINE ARCKEEPER AK175PRB REMOTE BALLAST. MOUNT BALLAST WITHIN 25' OF FIXTURE 4. REFER TO 1 /58.0 AND 2 /E3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON GENERATOR SYSTEM. 5. CONNECT TO NEW 20AMP, 2 POLE BREAKER IN EXISTING 120 /208V POWER PANEL VIA 20AMP, 2 POLE RELAY. CONTROL RELAY FROM LCP —A 6. CONNECT TO SERVING UTILITY. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILITY REOUIREMENTS. C WY a r c h i t e c t s I"minal SaIl Nut Otnq 1932 Furst Avenue S. to 409 Coatt n, WA 4H101 '116.!)11 /001 ( Thom 206.120.29 =9 Fro w ww. c ra tta rc hit ects .co m Sheet Title: Project No: Approved: z O z cc o 0 CC • a • W W L OCO J U X CONSULTANT 2 0 6 GLUMAC n0.. Saps.. tau909 tame. OR rat. L 90)]2,300 F. 901.974.714 Imortburacregss 9e9ta: 207W2001A me J. FERGUSON I.t.o 01/28/2009 Revisions: 11.09.07 SITE RESUBMITTAL ELECTRICAL 51TE PLAN Date: IVV/O7 Design: Drown: J:P 2C7112001A MEN Sheet No: E1.0 COPYRIGIIT0D=007 8LDMAC EXISTING LUMINAIRE APPROXIMATE LOCATION. LXiSIING" RINTWORE APPROXIMATE LOCATION. REFER TO CML PLAN FOR EXACT LOG710N. L LCP—A -16.17 J PROJECT NORM \ FOR EXACT LOCATION. ` \ I \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 O ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN- PARCEL 'B' SCALE: 1' ■20 0 10' 20' 40' GENERAL NOTES REFER TO ELECTRICAL DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALL DETAILS APPLY FOR APPLICABLE SITUAT10NS WHEMER REFERENCED ON THE PUN OR NOT. B. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR SITE LUMINAIRES. C. ALL SITE POWER SHALL BE MINIMUM /10 *IRE IN 3/4 E / S AR C PArl a r c h i t e c t s I�•m rnrl SaIrs Hui cling 1932 First Avenue S. to 408 S•att •. WA 413101 /11/..!/ 11./11111 4fnnnr 206,720.24 =4 ya w ww. c ra tte rc hi t ects z ¢ w 000e ¢ W W 3 u' o o J O X W CONSULTANT G LU M.AC Pat I ) 4 ....�.. re sca 01 .>z.. scams= P. annum ) 207W2001A O..d J. FERGUSON yYwnb w•b"WY hum 11.09.07 SITE RESUBMITTAL Sheet Title: .. WJ SITE PLAN - PAR 8' Date: Design: Drown: Project No: MPS: 1114/01 Jc JCF 2770001A O. MEM Sheet No: E1.1 COPYRIGHT 07:007 D Th AC