Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L07-037 - BRADLEY JESSICA - WELLS FARGO BANK DESIGN REVIEWWELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS 6855 S 180 ST L07-037 www.mcnichols.com R 1-8 E237 80 � t Sample supplied for structure comparison only, not cosmetic features. Edges or surface may be sharp, abrasive 1' 1. 4' December 14, 2007 Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: CL Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 NOD.doc • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION TO Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, Applicant Tom Dawes, Project Manager, for Wells Fargo Bank, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Laura Murphy, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. . I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L07 -037 Applicant: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, for Wells Fargo Bank Type of Perrnit Applied for: Design Review Project Description: construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt up building with 5,682 sq. ft. truck load/unload area and truck turn around and associated employee parking on one parcel and a 56 stall stand alone over flow parking lot within the Riversbend Office/Industrial Park. Both parcels lie within the 200 shoreline environment Sperry Drive and S. 180 Street E07 -008, SEPA review; L07 -035, Shoreline Substantial Development permit Tukwila Urban Center/ Tukwila Urban Center II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has: X_ determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS). Page 1 of3 12/14/2007 I:I I:OOPM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Notice of Decision L07 -037: Wells Fargo Bank December 14, 2007 • • Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Board of Architectural Review has determined that the application for approval of the building's design and landscaping does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the conditions which are set forth in the Decision and noted below: 1. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to include evergreen trees along the front of the site to provide some year -round color as well as revise the plant material to avoid conflicts with utility lines. The revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR design approval. 2. Revise location of building to avoid conflicts with utility easements; the revised building location shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR design approval. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Council of the Board of Architectural Review decision is permitted. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by Friday, January 4, 2008 at 5:00 p.m. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee of $205. CL Page 2 of 3 12/14/2007 1:11:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 NOD.doc Notice of Decision L07 -037: Wells Fargo Bank December 14, 2007 • • V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The City Council hearing regarding the appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the Council based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The City Council decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Cibtv e4.14,14 Department of Community Development City of Tukwila CL Page 3 of 3 12/14/2007 1:1 1:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 NOD.doc . 0 Y.• ®� i s :1..11111111..11 11 . 1 1! V III 1m 1 1111 ..... IIII I I 1 Hip 1 111 111 I it lira r k, 111358 C1, 4 a a a A A A A e 1 0 15215 72ND .VENUE SOUTH KENT. 532 85032 (425)251-6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX aw. OCKDava. wu 0S 80087n anrmwlmau MIME, On. ate... � .6/2215/ • ��s11��1��6 �I �II�I�IIIg�911 :11111:111:11 :1 I: II'11 5 1 d gl i ;�4 ��l, 3. a i•! • i Ii a '1 gi rl I.p 41.3111.;1si111 E 1 1i � ii "1' s1 I R1 ' rl l ,1 A 1 11 : 11 1 11 6 F.INO 11 1 51 1 1 �`11tea i a i q104 a1 R 111 1 Pa s I11v 1 Ii a 9' i R I R p R 885 6 . i 4 C 1 h 2 8 i 8I 2 i 1R 1 e 4 I .19 1 41 11 a 211 111 I � R 11 115 1 1 r I5 v v� 12 I a I vv v wla 1 I R 5 1 1 1 i vid v 1 11 wit I IT 58 6 12 1 8.111 ■ 1 all hi 6 1 1 8 v ! I I I v4� I I Ia 8l 1 615 'R 111 Far CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 RRST AVENUE, SURE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 �.ias 1h1a1 0.. F F 11 1: 1 11 1 11 11 1 1 11 11 1111 F 6J J88 I1 1 � �I � 1 11 # a aR J,1;4 ii -a -w, i� piRi a o5* X1181!2 811 Iii1�Q�A�idR a!e AI 11 11•e 11ii i1 11v ',��'j a il p yr 118 1 I� for I i 5 w 1� 1 1 I a Ri 11 iv 11 1 F 18211 11 M 1 1! 51 I ; 1 1111 1 ° 1i I ims COVER SHEET WELLS FARO - CV OPERATION TUKWLA, WASH rr+wma\lav .00ra$ - .,1 u.m...sn.imm r.. w x«' . r 051[3 xM ..12158 -N4N 1.l7E31 -Kw4 *206 -sM HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONTACT: CL Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared December 3, 2007 December 13, 2007 Notice of Application posted and mailed to surrounding properties June 25, 2007 Notice of Public Hearing published, mailed to surrounding properties and posted on site November 29, 2007 L07 -037 E07 -009 SEPA File (Environmental Review) L07 -035 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank To approve the design of a 12,983 sq. ft. square foot concrete tilt - up building with 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area and associated employee parking along with a stand alone 56 stall parking lot on a separate parcel to provide overflow parking for the 3 Wells Fargo buildings in the industrial park. The sites are located in a horseshoe bend of the Green River. 6855 S. 180 St. Tukwila Urban Center Tukwila Urban Center Determination of Nonsignificance Approval with Conditions Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Page 1 of 12 • 12/06/2007 3:51:00 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 ATTACHMENTS: A. Plan Set: Select Civil Plans, Landscaping Plan, Site Plan, Building Elevations, Lighting Plan B. Aerial Photo of Project Sites C. Applicant Design Review Criteria Response D. SEPA Determination and Staff Report E. Shoreline Decision and Staff Report F. Colored Set of Building Elevations G. Color Board (to be provided at hearing) Vicinity /Site Information A. Project Description: • • FINDINGS The applicant is proposing to construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up building with 5,682 truck loading area on one parcel with a stand alone parking lot with 56 stalls on a second parcel to provide overflow parking for the other two Wells Fargo buildings in the office /industrial park where the sites are located. The new building will be a paper processing facility for the bank and as such has security concerns not usually encountered with other office /industrial buildings. The building sites are located at a bend in the Green River which surrounds the sites on the east and south sides. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs along the riverward side of the sites. The development is subject to the Shoreline Management Act. Proposed Building Site (looking west) CL Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc Page 2 of 12 Proposed Stand Alone Parking Lot Site 12/07/2007 3:06:00 PM L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 B. Existing Development: The parcels are located in a small office /industrial park in the Tukwila Urban Center district. When entering the development on Sperry Drive, a former bank building now used for training is on the east side of the street, with a second building used for paper processing located on the west side of the street south of the new building site. A building used for manufacturing, Carlyle Industries, located at the end of the street. Existing Paper Processing Building • • Carlyle Building CL Page 3 of 12 Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 DR StaffRpt.doc Former Bank Building 12/07/2007 3:06:00 PM L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 C. Surrounding Land Use: • • The parcels are located on the Green River in the Riversbend Industrial /Office Center. The site lies on the south side of S. 180 Street across from Taco Time and The Home Depot store. The surrounding areas are designated Tukwila Urban Center on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Tukwila Urban Center. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs along the perimeter of the Riversbend Industrial /Office Center and the Green River Trail runs along the top of the levee; an office /industrial park is located across the river in an area zoned Commercial /Light Industrial. D. Terrain: The site is generally flat except for the west boundary of the building site and east boundary of the parking lot site which is bermed as part of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee system that runs along this portion of the river. The soils are comprised of silty sands and organic silt with peat inclusions. The geotechnical report recommends pre - loading the site, as the soils are expected to settle approximately 3.5 to 4.5 inches. The report also recommends importing structural fill to provide support for the footings and floor slabs. E. Vegetation: The proposed site currently is a grassy field; the proposed parking lot is also a grass field, with three cottonwood trees that will be removed to construct the parking lot. A landscaping plan has been provided for both parcels and will be discussed below. F. Access: Access to the industrial /office park is provided via Sperry Drive, a private road, which intersects with South 180 Street. BACKGROUND SEPA for the proposed building and stand alone parking lot was issued on November 19, 2007 (see Attachment D). No comments or appeals were received during the 14 day comment period. The Shoreline Substantial Development permit was issued on December 4, 2007 (see Attachment E). The 21 -day appeal period for the Shoreline permit closes on December 26, 2007. CL Page 4 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CRITERIA Design review is required for all structures in the Tukwila Urban Center zone that are larger than 1,500 square feet. In the following discussion, the BAR criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. The applicant's responses to the BAR criteria are found in Attachment C. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Response: The site is located in an office /industrial park on the Green River. The height of the building, 22 feet, is less than the maximum height permitted within the Tukwila Urban Center district— 115 feet maximum. The proposed new structure is similar in height to the other buildings in the office /industrial park and is at a pedestrian scale. No structures lie within the River or Low Impact Environments of the shoreline; the truck turn around and truck load and unload areas lie within the High Impact Environment of the shoreline. The majority of the parking stalls and the truck loading area lie behind the building and will not be visible from S. 180 Street. A vinyl coated chain link fence with privacy slats is proposed on a portion of the north side of the site and on the west and south the site with the landscaping placed outside the fencing, which will screen parking from view as well (see additional discussion below on the chain link fencing). The sidewalk along S. 180 Street will be continued onto the new building site on the east side to tie the property to the public right of way. The new building requires 43 new parking stalls. The 25 parking stalls are provided on- site, with the remainder provided on the adjacent parcel, also owned by Wells Fargo and developed with a building used as a paper processing facility. The adjacent property has a total of 88 parking stalls; the existing building requires 67 parking stalls, which leaves 21 parking stalls to be used by the new building, which is slightly more than required. The property owner will execute a parking covenant to ensure parking is available if either parcel is sold in the future. The request for covenant parking is a Type 2 decision made by the Department of Community Development Director. CL Page 5 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 DR StaffRpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Response: The building materials are painted concrete panels, CMU veneer and CMU block. These materials are used to create visual interest, add depth, break -up the north facing building facade and give a somewhat retail appearance to the building. The new building has a more varied facade than the existing paper processing building, which is more non - descript in appearance (see photo on page 3), however the new building will block visibility of most of this building from public view. The other existing Wells Fargo building just to the east is a former bank building; the new building is similar in scale to the former bank building. Landscaping has been used to integrate the new building site with the existing paper processing building. The dry creek bed feature which runs along the north and east side of the new building extends past the south parcel line to the northern edge of the existing building to provide a "seamless" landscaping connection. The new stand alone parking lot, by converting an open grassy area to parking, integrates the former bank building with the Carlyle Industries building on the south. Vehicular access to the site is obtained via South 180 Street and then Sperry Drive. The existing circulation pattern on -site has been expanded by the addition of new parking stalls to serve the new building site and the delivery trucks that will access the truck load/unload area. An existing parking island that serves the current paper processing building will be reconfigured to allow better truck circulation to the new building. The new stand alone parking lot will be connected to the existing parking area serving the former bank building as well as be directly connected to Sperry Drive. There is a pedestrian connection between the new stand alone parking lot and the former bank building. A bus stop is located just north of the new building. Any employee arriving by bus can use the sidewalk that will be constructed along the east side of the property to access the new building. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; CL Page 6 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The landscaping plan, sheets L -1 and L -2 of Attachment A, illustrates the proposed landscaping for the new building and the stand alone parking lot. The Tukwila Urban Center district requires 15 feet of landscaping at the front of the site along S. 180 Street and the second front along Sperry Drive, and none on the sides and rear of the site. Landscaping is provided on the west side and the rear of the site because this area is located within the shoreline environment. Landscaping is required for the parking areas. Native plants are used in the shoreline areas. The landscaping along the north and east sides of the building incorporates a dry creek bed feature and boulders along with the formal landscaping materials. The dry creek bed and boulders (used in lieu of bollards) are part of the security features for the building. The planting materials have been selected to avoid shrubs that will grow too high, which can be a security hazard. All deciduous trees have been proposed along the S. 180 Street frontage; no evergreen trees are incorporated which would provide year -round color. The stand alone parking lot provides a large landscaped area ranging from 30 to 60 feet on the east side of the site; this area falls within the shoreline environment. Landscape parking islands are provided throughout the parking lot as required by the code. A narrow drainage swale is incorporated into the 15 foot landscape area along the south side of the parking lot which will be planted with emergent plant material. The applicant is proposing an eight foot high, black vinyl chain link fence with privacy slats to connect to the northwest corner of the CMU wall that obscures the truck turn around area. The chain link fence would extend approximately 65 feet west along S. 180 Street. The fence would then turn south and run approximately 45 feet along the west side of the site adjacent to the new pedestrian path connection to the Green River Trail. At the edge of the new parking stalls on the south side of the parcel paralleling the Green River Trail the fence would connect to an existing chain link fence along the Trail. The fence is proposed for security purposes as well as to obscure the site activities from CL Page 7 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • view of the trail and S. 180 Street. Chain link fencing with slats will also be used to control access to the truck turn around and loading area. The location of the chain link fencing is identified on plan sheet A1.0. Several pictures of the existing chain link fencing are below. The applicant has stated that it is the intent of the property owner to install privacy slats in the existing chain link fence as well. Green River Trail with fence looking west to bridge Existing Chain Link Fence — new fence will connect at this corner This site is located in the Tukwila Urban Center along one of its busiest east/west traffic corridors; the chain link fence will be visible from the path and right of way. Design guideline 3.F. above states that "(S)creening of service yards, and other places that tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination." The design guidelines do not specify what type of fencing materials to use — allowing flexibility on material type depending on the setting. Chain link fencing is an inexpensive fencing material that is more indicative of an industrial area rather than the retail center of the City and office areas. Projects subject to design review can be held to higher design standards than projects for which only a building permit is required. Both stand alone light poles and wall mounted light fixtures are used to provide illumination to the parking lot and the building. The fixtures are a dark bronze in color and typical of the fixtures in use on the site already. The proposed lighting is shielded to avoid spillage onto adjacent properties and the river. The dumpster will be located inside the fenced enclosure and therefore will be screened from view. 4. Building Design. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; CL Page 8 of 12 12/07/2007 3:06:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo'L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; D. Colors should be harmonious with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: The scale of the proposed building is similar to the other office /industrial type structures in the Riversbend Office /Industrial Park. The architectural style is concrete tilt -up, with visual interest added by the use of color and materials. While the site is not being used for retail use, the building has been designed to somewhat resemble a retail structure while still addressing the need for building security. The north side of the building has an emergency exiting door that is designed to look like a front door with a metal canopy overhanging it, and decorative metal panels interspersed along the upper portion of the north facade to mimic window panes. The color scheme uses "Restrained Gold" as the color for the majority of the body of the building with "Netsuke" a cream tone used for contrast on the wall panels that have the brick treatment. The color "Cafe Ole ", a plum/brown tone, is used for accent purposes for the parapet and the cornices. The brick adds texture to the walls, some depth and visual interest. The color used is a cream color with slight pink tones ( "Mojave "), with bands of brown ( "Mauna Loa ") used for contrast. These colors are similar to the color palette used by Wells Fargo for their bank buildings. Decorative metal panels are used in place of windows along the north facade; these will be the same Dark Bronze color that is being used on the upper wall. The metal panels will have square perforations, 3 /4 inch holes, 1 inch on center - to give texture. The panels will be surrounded in a frame, +/- 1 inch thick to give thickness to the panel. The panels will stand off of the face of the building 1 to 2 inches to give depth. Staff discussed substituting a spandrel panel to mimic a window on the building, however, the applicant has stated that switching to a spandrel panel would require the concrete wall panels to be increased in thickness from 8 inches to 10.5 inches. This would produce heavier wall panels which would require different foundations and different equipment for installation which would result in significant additional cost to the project. The decorative metal panels complement the building's color palette. The metal canopy over the exit door on S. 180 Street and the metal roof over the truck turn around area are colored "Colonial Red." "Dark Bronze" is used for the decorative panels located on the CL Page 9 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • upper wall of the artificial front on the north facade. The decorative panels are in two shapes — three rectangular panels on one side of the wall and slender vertical panels on the opposite side. The slender vertical metal panels are used on the east facade of the building as well. Please note the colors discussed in the applicant's design review narrative (Attachment C) were revised to the colors identified above, along with the original building design, after discussions with DCD staff. The cornice along the top of the building will be painted Cafe Ole as will the screen for the roof top mechanical equipment. The concrete walls will be scored in a rectangular grid pattern above the exit door on the north wall and around the rear door on the south elevation. A horizontal band will be scored approximately one -third of the way down from the parapet to add visual interest. The lighting plan is included as part of Attachment A, on sheets E1.0 and E1.1. Wall mounted lights will be used to illuminate the landscape areas surrounding the building as well as the building entrance. Pole mounted lights will be used to illuminate the parking area serving the new building and the stand alone parking lot. The lighting fixtures are bronze in color to match the color scheme used on the building. An emergency generator is located on the south side of the new building behind the security fencing that restricts access to the truck turn around and loading area. 5. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: The chain link fencing can be considered a miscellaneous structure which should be designed to be a part of the architectural concept of the project. The issue of the chain link fencing is discussed in more detail under 3. above. A bicycle rack will be provided at the entrance to the building. CONCLUSIONS 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The new structure is similar in height to the buildings already located in the office /industrial park and is pedestrian in scale. Parking and loading areas are primarily behind the existing buildings. Only 25 of the required 43 parking stalls CL Page 10 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 1 • are provided on the new building site; the remainder of the parking stalls are provided on the adjacent property, also owned and used by Wells Fargo Bank. The adjacent use requires 67 parking stalls; there are 88 parking stalls on that site leaving sufficient stalls to provide the total number of required stalls for the new building. The property owner will execute a parking covenant to ensure availability of adequate parking into the future. Approval of covenant parking is a Type 2 decision, reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Community Development. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: The site is located in an area zoned for a mix of retail and light industrial uses. The building materials — painted concrete panels, CMU veneer and CMU block are similar to the building materials used in adjacent buildings and will provide more visual interest than the existing Wells Fargo paper processing building. The perimeter landscaping on the east side of the new building has been extended to the site to the south to provide a seamless transition between properties. A sidewalk on the east side of the site will connect to the existing sidewalk on S. 180 Street to provide a pedestrian connection to the public right -of -way. The parking for the existing paper processing facility has been reconfigured somewhat to accommodate the flow of truck deliveries. A pedestrian connection is provided between the stand alone parking lot and the former bank building that is used for training. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: The landscape plan provides 15 feet of landscaping on the north and east sides of the new building site, which are the two street frontages. The two frontage landscaping areas incorporate a dry creek bed feature with boulders as one of the security features for the site. No evergreen trees have been included as part of the front landscaping to provide year -round greenery. Side and rear landscaping is provided, which falls within the 200 foot shoreline environment. Native plantings will be used within the shoreline environment. Landscaping is also provided in the stand alone parking lot, including a 15 foot landscaping strip on the south side of the parking lot and a planting area in the Low Impact shoreline environment that ranges from 30 to 60 feet in width. Landscaped parking bulbs are provided as required by the landscaping code. Eight foot high, black vinyl chain link fencing with security slats is proposed to extend approximately 65 feet beyond the CMU walls on the north facade and then continue around the west approximately 45 feet and then along the south side of the CL Page 11 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • site connecting to existing chain link fencing along the Green River Trail. The design guidelines do not specify what type of fencing materials to use — allowing flexibility on material type depending on the setting. Different fencing material, such as continuation of the CMU walls is a more appropriate material for the Tukwila Urban Center. Since there is already chain link fencing along the Green River Trail, use of vinyl coated chain link fencing without slats would provide an appropriate transition from one site to the next in this location. 4. Building Design: The building design is typical of combination office /warehouse buildings. The building will be concrete tilt -up, with CMU veneer and block used to add texture and some depth. The color palette resembles that used by Wells Fargo for its banks. Due to security concerns, there are no windows, but rather metal panels are used to simulate windows on the north facade; the same color metal panels are used to add visual interest, depth and texture to the upper portion of the north wall. Lighting is provided throughout both parking lots and on the building itself. The color scheme is harmonious with no brilliant or garish colors used. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: The chain link fencing is a miscellaneous structure and should be designed to be a part of the architectural concept of the project. A bicycle rack is provided at the building entrance. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design of the Wells Fargo paper processing building and the landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. Substitute a different material for the black vinyl chain link fence with slats which extends from the end of the CMU wall on the northwest corner of the building around the west and south sides of the site. The revised fence details shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR approval. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to include evergreen trees along the front of the site to provide some year - round color. CL Page 12 of 12 12/07/2007 10:45:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc L07 -037: Wells Fargo Building Board of Architectural Review Staff Report December 3, 2007 • • site connecting to existing chain link fencing along the Green River Trail. The design guidelines do not specify what type of fencing materials to use — allowing flexibility on material type depending on the setting. Different fencing material, such as continuation of the CMU walls is a more appropriate material for the Tukwila Urban Center. Since there is already chain link fencing along the Green River Trail, use of vinyl coated chain link fencing without slats would provide an appropriate transition from one site to the next in this location. 4. Building Design: The building design is typical of combination office /warehouse buildings. The building will be concrete tilt -up, with CMU veneer and block used to add texture and some depth. The color palette resembles that used by Wells Fargo for its banks. Due to security concerns, there are no windows, but rather metal panels are used to simulate windows on the north facade; the same color metal panels are used to add visual interest, depth and texture to the upper portion of the north wall. Lighting is provided throughout both parking lots and on the building itself. The color scheme is harmonious with no brilliant or garish colors used. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: The chain link fencing is a miscellaneous structure and should be designed to be a part of the architectural concept of the project. A bicycle rack is provided at the building entrance. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design of the Wells Fargo paper processing building and the landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. Sus titute diffi e which x nds from Long m oA i building and the shall be reviewed a .. fe with slats the nce details .. .. to the BAR approval. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscaping plan to include evergreen trees along the front of the site to provide some year - round color as well as revise the plant material to avoid conflicts with utility lines. The revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR design approval. 3 . Revise location of building to avoid conflicts with utility easements; the revised building location shall be reviewed administratively as a minor modification to the BAR design approval. CL Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -037 DR Staff Rpt.doc aterial f e end of th est and sou inistrative y as a minor`modificatio si black MU wall softh chain lnk the north site.The r nce ' st co PV a nd fir 4A (NA416 h41/0,15 i2I 13 /a7 Page 12 of 12 � , I 7 07 5:37:00 PM d 1J r u ) 124 (3/01 ioy B.A.R. W Lt•o, -• 2, 3 `P 4 MEEMEMEMBEM 450ft CityGIS N Copyright © 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. • • WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS City of Tukwila Design Review Narrative July 3, 2007 1. a. The proposed building is located on the corner of S 180 and Sperry Drive. It is not a retail building nor is there a customer service component so pedestrian access is not desired. The existing sidewalk on 180 will be maintained and a minimum depth of 15' of landscaping will be added between 180 and the building. The activity taking place within the building (sorting /processing of paper products) requires a high level of security. To meet the owner's security needs, the landscaping proposed at the corner is a meandering creek bed with large rocks instead of bollards. (See below for additional description of proposed landscaping.) b. Service areas and majority of parking is not visible from S 180 or Sperry. Service areas are enclosed with a CMU wall and there are large landscape islands between the end of the parking and the street. c. The height of the building is 22'. The heights of the enclosed truck bay are 15' and 10'. The height of the adjacent building is 17' -6 ". 2. a. The building materials are painted concrete panels, CMU veneer and CMU block. Paint, split face CMU and ground face CMU are strategically applied to create visual interest and break -up the large rectangular mass both vertically and horizontally. b. This building is part of an existing campus of Wells Fargo buildings. The levy and Green River abut the west property line of the proposed new sorting facility. This project does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and will not affect or alter the actual shoreline of the Green River or its existing pedestrian path located on the top of the levy. There is currently a path leading from the sidewalk along S 180 Street to the pedestrian pathway along the top of the levy cutting across the northwest corner of the site. We propose to maintain this path in keeping with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan Section 4.3.2 "Existing Public Access Sites ". 42% of the site will also be landscaped including informal open space in the northwest corner of the site. There will be no disruption to existing trees within the river environment except for minor trimming as necessary for public safety. Some of the existing low growing shrubs within the river protection easement on this site and the adjacent property will be replaced with low growing ground 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 PH: 206.720.7001 Fax: 206.720.2949 ATT AGENT C Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 2 of 5 061907Design Review Narrative.doc • • cover for bank control and public safety. The existing vegetation onsite consists only of grasses. The new landscaping will include some lawn, drought tolerant plantings, new trees and shrubs that will enhance and complement the landscaping on the adjacent property to the south. c. The site is located in a fully developed area, surrounded by retail to the north, office to the east and a data processing facility also owned and operated by Wells Fargo to the south. The levy and Green River abut the Phase One parking lot on the east. The existing neighborhood character is large box, warehouse type retail, office and industrial type buildings. Although our building type and use are industrial in nature, we have added color, texture and modulation to the north elevation which faces retail sites and S 180 d. The vehicular circulation pattern will not change. Access to the new building will be through an existing Wells Fargo parking lot. The pedestrian circulation pattern will not change. e. The vehicular circulation pattern and driveway entries will not change. 3. The existing site is flat and featureless. The existing vegetation onsite consists only of grasses. Due to the high security nature of this site, large trees and large shrubs are discouraged. The new landscaping will include some lawn, drought tolerant plantings, new trees and shrubs. Service areas are screened with walls and fences. Landscaping up against fencing is also provided. Due to security concerns, exterior lighting is important to Wells Fargo — both building mounted and site pole fixtures are provided. Wells Fargo standard fixtures are proposed. These fixtures are a commercial grade, industrial type fixture, consistent with the adjacent community. The light fixture color is dark bronze. Quantity and quality is a compromise between security standards and light trespass sections of the code. Our goal is to strike a balance between the security requirements that limit our lighting and landscaping opportunities and create an enjoyable place for people to work. 4. a. Due to security concerns we are not trying to make a 'statement' with our building — blending into our surroundings is our goal. b. Building scale is consistent with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components are proportionate and consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors are harmonious; beige, yellow, green and red. None of the colors are highly saturated. The darkest color (red) is used for the metal roof and parapet coping. The brightest accent color (yellow) is used to identify the entry. All roof top equipment has been Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 3 of 5 • • screened from view. Exterior lighting is part of the architectural concept and harmonious with building design. Visual interest has been provided on the building using paint, CMU veneer and CMU block. 5. There are no miscellaneous structures associated with the building. Street furniture is discouraged due to security concerns – loitering near the building is not encouraged. A bike rack has been provided at the building entry. 6. This proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Tukwila in the following ways: Visually attractive – A variety of textures, materials, colors and heights have been used to create visual interest, contrast, and rhythm and turn a large rectangular mass into an attractive structure. Our design goal is to be simple and unassuming. The landscaping is professionally designed, climatically appropriate and drought tolerant. Value to the community – We believe constructing this building on a currently undeveloped site; replacing un- manicured grasses with a building and professional landscaping adds value to the community and provides new employment opportunities. Designed with pride – At Craft Architects, we are dedicated to our clients' needs and strive to exceed expectations. This building, like any other work we do, is important to us and deserves our best ideas and effort. This site is Wells Fargo's Tukwila campus and this building is a direct reflection of their brand. Constructed with quality workmanship – Since 1972, Poe Construction has maintained a high level of quality and integrity, which has garnered them a solid reputation throughout the industry. They construct only commercial buildings for the private sector in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. They stake their future, their reputation, and the culture of their company on their ability to build and maintain high integrity relationships —with personnel, clients, specialty contractors, suppliers, professional service providers, design partners, building officials, and their community. Poe's people demonstrate their priorities of honesty, integrity, respect, and trust. Their mission is to demonstrate this whether on a building project or contributing time, talent, or treasure to the community. Poe's union - certified field supervisors, carpenters, and laborers provide the highest level of quality on every project. Wholesome and in harmony with adjacent uses - The site is located in a fully developed area, surrounded by retail to the north, office to the east and a data processing facility also owned and operated by Wells Fargo to the south. The 061907Design Review Narrative.doc Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 4 of 5 • • levy and Green River abut West property line. The existing neighborhood character is large box, warehouse type retail, office and industrial type buildings. Due to security concerns we are not trying to make a 'statement' with our building — blending into our surroundings is our goal. Building scale is consistent with permanent neighboring developments. Traffic and congestion patterns — This site will be accessed via Sperry Drive. Sperry Drive connects to S 180 Street with a signaled intersection. Upon completion, on average, approximately 22 people will work in the new building. At maximum capacity (in the future) 30 -35 people could work in the new building. Delivery traffic is estimated at (15) trucks per day, (8) of these occurring between 4:00 and 6:OOpm. No customer or visitor traffic will occur. We believe that because the intersection is signaled, employees, neighbors and /or Tukwila residents will not notice the changes in traffic and congestion patterns. Characteristics of Tukwila's history — We could say that Wells Fargo is a symbol of the pioneering spirit for which the City of Tukwila was settled upon. Honestly, this project was not intended to reflect any specific characteristic of Tukwila's history. It is to Wells Fargo's advantage to locate their CV Operations near the Federal Reserve, which we understand is now located in Tukwila. Fencing and landscape buffers provided between commercial and residential uses — not applicable, no residential uses nearby. Adequate parking and lighting — Upon completion, on average, approximately 22 people will work in the new building. At maximum capacity (in the future) 30- 35 people could work in the new building. To accommodate these new employees (110) parking stalls adjacent to the building and (56) new overflow parking stalls across Sperry Drive have been added. Total # of parking stalls on the campus is (224). The lighting on this parcel and the adjacent parcel will be replaced to meet Wells Fargo security guidelines and City of Tukwila guidelines. The following Tight levels are proposed: • A minimum of 2 footcandles across the site • An average value slightly greater than 5 footcandles around the perimeter of the building • A minimum of 10 footcandles at the entrance • The area surrounding the entrance was also kept at an average just above 10 footcandles. Open spaces and trails - The levy and Green River abut the west property line of the proposed new sorting facility. This project does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and will not affect or alter the actual shoreline of the Green River or its existing pedestrian path located on the top of the levy. There is currently a path leading from the sidewalk along S 180 Street to the pedestrian pathway along the top of the levy cutting across the 061907Design Review Narrative.doc Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 5 of 5 061907Design Review Narrative.doc northwest corner of the site. We propose to maintain this path in keeping with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan Section 4.3.2 "Existing Public Access Sites ". No new trails are proposed. Connection to City's trail network — The project proposes maintaining and enhancing existing path connections to trail network. Applicant: JESSICA BRADLEY Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: den- r)NS -4/07 File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: City tf Tukwila • Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite # 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http://wwwatulcwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E07 -009 05/25/2007 11/19/2007 ISSUED Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: 12,983 sf of new tilt up concrete building for storage of paper products. 5682 sf covered truck loading for distribution of product. Parcel B is parking lot for 56 cars. 6855 S 180 ST TUKW 3623049095 36 -23-04 The "ity has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An envir impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed envi chec dist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by belLiz-'r` ° i - , 2 " x " The lead agency on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jack Pac espons' le O �� cial Date i ) r' Zjd7 City of y a 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a c: unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time pe appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) Cn7 nne ATTACHMENT D ' Project Description: • City JThkwlla MEMORANDUM Proponent: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Location: Sperry Drive and S. 180 Street Date prepared: July 31, 2007 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development CL Q: \Wells Fargo\E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 19, 2007 To: Jack Pace, Director, Dept. of Community Development Fm: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Re: Project File No. E07 -009: Wells Fargo CV Operations Building and Stand Alone Parking Lot Construct a 12,983 sq. ft. new tilt -up concrete building for sorting and storage of paper products within 200 feet of the Green River. A 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area will be constructed as part of the building of steel and CMU. A parking lot for 56 cars will be constructed on an adjacent parcel for overflow parking to be used by an existing Wells Fargo building that is used for training as well as the other Wells Fargo building and the new building. The sites are located at a bend in the Green River which surrounds the sites on the south and east sides (see aerial photo, page three). A U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Section 205 levee runs along the riverward side of the sites. Page 1 of 8 11/15/2007 4:03:00 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor iG ?nn c....rh..., .. f..« D.... 1........../ Q.,:a.. 1111111 110100 DR,... 91144 4•1 9A 711 - r..... •n44 491 9( C SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology Recommendation: Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) Existing Environmental Information: • Geotechnical Report dated April 17, 2007 prepared by Geo Engineers, Inc. • Technical Information Report, dated July 21, 2007; revised November 8, 2007 prepared by Barghausen Engineering. Comments on SEPA Checklist: Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth • • Page 5, #5b. The Puget Sound Chinook salmon has been listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service as a threatened species. This species is found in the Green River which borders the development sites on the south and east. The site is generally flat, with the maximum slope 2% outside of the levee. Two soil borings were taken on the site. The geotechnical report prepared by Geo Engineers identified alluvial soil deposits: the sod at the surface was underlain by silty sand in a loose to very loose moist condition that extends to about 6.5 feet below ground surface. Below this layer are interbedded layers of very soft or loose silt, sandy silt, silty sand and organic silt with peat inclusions to a depth of 26.5 feet. Below this layer is a layer of sand with silt that ranges from loose to medium dense. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 10 feet below ground surface on the first boring and 8 feet in the second boring. Groundwater depths vary seasonally, with levels being generally higher in the winter and spring months. The Report recommends the site be pre - loaded for at least one month and surcharged to reduce the potential for unacceptable post - construction settlement. CL Page 2 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo1E07 -008 Staff Rpt,doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 • • Approximately 500 cubic yards will excavated on -site and 2,500 cubic yards of imported fill will be placed on site for the pre - loading. Approximately 700 cubic yards of stripped soil will be hauled off -site. A rock construction entrance and silt fencing will be used to reduce run -off of sediment during construction. Post construction, landscaping and the installed surface water control will provide erosion control. Air During construction small quantities of vehicle emissions, paint odors and dust will occur during grading. After the project is complete, typical quantities of vehicle emissions from on -site traffic can be expected Water The subject parcels are located in a horseshoe bend of the Green River, which abuts the building site on the south and the parking area on the east. The project is subject to the State Shoreline Management Act as the site development takes place within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction. A small portion of the landscape area falls within the River Environment with the parking area and a portion of the new building falling within the Low Impact and High Impact shoreline environments. The new parking lot falls within the Low and High Impact shoreline environments. CL Page 3 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 The project site does not lie within a 100 -year flood plain as it lies behind a U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (COE) levee that was recently re- certified. The COE has identified a section of the riverbank just upstream from this site as having been damaged in the winter storms of 2006 and in need of immediate repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the COE to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. The width of the current levee easement does not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies the applicant has been requested to provide additional easement area to allow the levee to be set back at a maximum slope of 2.5 to 1. The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and to grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila (TMC 16.52.100 C.). Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require that the property owner grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If the additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The requested easement width is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The property owner has agreed to provide the additional easement area. This will permit achieving a 2.5:1 side slope of the levee and the inclusion of a bench at the base of the levee that will be planted with native vegetation to improve the habitat along the river. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water, nor will there be any surface water or ground water withdrawals or diversions. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters will occur. The building will be connected to the City of Tukwila's sewage system. Runoff from the parking areas and building roof will be collected onsite in an underground detention and water quality vault prior to discharge to City storm water line in S. 180 Street. The storm water line flows to the P -17 storm water pond to the north. Plants • • Both the site for the new building and the site for the new parking area are covered with grass. One cottonwood tree, approximately 36 feet tall, exists on the parcel that will be developed with the parking lot. This tree falls outside the shoreline area. No other trees or vegetation exists on the parcels to be developed. Formal landscaping CL Page 4 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q:1 Wells Fargo1E07 -008 StaffRpt.doc K SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 will be provided at the new building site and in the parking lot, as required by the Zoning Code. Native and drought tolerant plantings will be used throughout the site. Animals The SEPA Checklist does not note any animals that have been observed on or near the site nor the presence of any threatened or endangered species on or near the site. Given the location of the site in an oxbow of the Green River, it is reasonable to assume that songbirds, ducks, crows and Canadian geese are probably located on or near the site. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway migration route. The only mammals observed on the site have been rodents. The National Marine Fisheries Service has listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. This species is known to inhabit the Green River. Energy/Natural Resources Environmental Health • • Electricity and natural gas will be used in the building for heating and other uses normal for office uses. Diesel fuel will be used to supply power to the backup generator and in the construction equipment during construction. The project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. The building will be designed and constructed to meet the Washington State Energy. No environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waster will be generated by the proposed uses on the parcels. Special emergency services required as a result of the proposed project are fire, ambulance and police. Site safety design techniques will be used including signage for traffic circulation, pedestrian walkways and site lighting to minimize environmental health hazards. Noise is generated by traffic along S. 180 Street and Sperry Way South street in front of the site and to the east. Construction noise will occur during regular hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. Noise will be generated from vehicles and trucks once the building is open for business. Land/Shoreline Uses Both of the sites proposed for development are currently vacant although they are located in a small commercial /light industrial park developed with a bank training CL Page 5 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 • • facility, a processing center also owned by Wells Fargo and a manufacturing operation related to the aerospace industry. As noted earlier, the sites are located in an oxbow of the Green River, with the river on the south side of one parcel and the east side of the other. The site is designated Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned TUC. The proposed use is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban and the proposal must obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development permit. Approximately 20 people will work in the new building initially when construction is completed. Ultimately, up to 30 -35 people may work in the facility at maximum capacity. Housing No housing exists on the site. Aesthetics The type of construction proposed for the building is tilt up concrete. The project is subject to design review and will be considered by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. There are no buildings located in the River or Low Impact Environment of the shoreline. The truck delivery area, which is 22 feet in height, falls within the High Impact shoreline environment. Light/Glare The building and parking area will have exterior security lighting. The light fixtures will be shielded to minimize any light trespass off -site. Recreation A pedestrian/bike trail system exists on the top of the levee which contains the Green River. Sidewalk already exists along S. 180 Street; a sidewalk will be constructed along the east side of the new building site to connect the new building with the street CL Page 6 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: Wells Fargo1E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 Historic /Cultural Preservation • • There are no places or objects listed on or proposed for national state or local preservation registers on the two sites to be developed. Transportation Both sites will be accessed via Sperry Drive, a private road which connects to S. 180 Street at a signalized intersection. A transit stop is located at the northeast corner of the parcel to be developed with the building. This site will include 24 new parking stalls. The other parcel , Parcel B, will be developed with 54 parking stalls, to be used by the bank training facility. Traffic concurrency fees and traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at the time of building permit issuance. Public Services The development of this site as a warehouse /office building will generate an increased need for public services such as police and fire. Utilities Utilities currently available at the site include electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, storm water and sanitary sewer. No additional utilities are anticipated to be needed as a result of the building construction. Public Comments Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the public comment period. The Tribe had the following questions about the project. The questions are in italics with the staff /applicant response following. 1. Where does the storm system that will receive stormwater from this project drain to? The checklist is incomplete. Response: The stormwater will be detained in a water quality vault and then be discharged to a City of Tukwila storm water system in S. 180 Street which then discharges to the P -17 pond, which lies just to the northeast of Costco. 2. How large is the deciduous tree that will be removed? What species of tree is it? How close to the Green River is this tree? Response: The deciduous tree to be removed is a cottonwood, is approximately 385 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark. This area falls outside of the CL Page 7 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc SEPA Staff Report E07 -008 Wells Fargo CV Building November 19, 2007 shoreline environment and is therefore exempt from the City's Tree Ordinance (TMC 18.54) which requires replacement of trees removed from sensitive areas. 3. Will the project include any low impact development techniques as described in the Low Impact Development guidelines (http: / /www.psat.wa.gov /Publications /LID tech manua105 /lid index.htm; additional information is available at the Puget Sound Action Team's website)? If not, why not? Response: The City's stormwater code encourages the use of LID development but does not require its use. The revised landscape plan, sheet L -1, uses a fifteen (15) foot wide landscape area along the south side of the stand alone parking area for additional water quality as a bio- filtration swale, also to disperse the runoff to minimize the impact to the downstream system. 4. What is the purpose of the "meandering dry creek bed with boulders that will be added along the NE corner of Parcel E? Is this feature needed? Would it be possible to replace this feature with planting trees along the areas of the Green River that are within 200 feet of the project areas to create shade and a source of organic materials for the Green River. Response: The dry creek bed is a landscaping feature provided to comply with the City's front yard landscaping requirements. This feature includes landscape material as well as the rocks that comprise the creek bed. The COE does not permit trees to be planted on certified levees due to concern about destabilization. The applicant is granting additional easement area to the City and the King County Levee District to permit the setting back of the levee at a future date. This will permit creation of a bench that can be planted to provide vegetation to improve the river habitat. 5. Please note that applicant's project consistency narrative is in error. There is ESA listed chinook that utilizes this portion of the Green River. In addition, there are steelhead trout and coho, both of which are proposed for listing that also utilize this portion of the Green River. Response: Comment noted. The staff report acknowledges the presence of threatened species in the Green River adjacent to the proposed development site and the file copy of the Checklist has noted this correction. Recommendation Determination of Nonsignificance • • CL Page 8 of 8 11/15/2007 3:58:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo1E07 -008 Staff Rpt.doc File Number: Applied: Approved: Expiration: City otI'ukwila Upon: the following property: Address: 6855 S 180 ST TUKW Parcel Number: 3623049095 Section/Township /Range: 36 -23 -04 Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us L07 -035 05/25/2007 12/04/2007 12/04/2009 Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions. • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT A permit is hereby granted to: JESSICA BRADLEY, FOR WELLS FARGO BANK to: Construct new 12,983 sq. ft. tilt up concrete building for storage of paper products. 5,682 sf covered truck loading for distribution of product on parcel A. Parcel B is stand alone over flow parking lot for 56 cars. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: Promote reasonable & appropriate use of shorelines; encourage econ. develop. & public access. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and any conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 - 14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may only be appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within 21 -days from the filing of this pem pit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For more detail information on appeals, refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. 4T) Date: jack ace, Director of Department of Community Development Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two (2) years from the effective date of the permit (the date the permit is filed with D.O.E.), per RCW 90.58.143(4). ATTACHMENT E • • Cizy of Tukwila • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 20007 TO: Jack Pace, Director, Department of Community Development FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner RE: Shoreline Permit: L07 -035 Wells Fargo CV Operations Building 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves the construction of a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building with a 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking for storage and sorting /processing of paper products and a separate parking lot to serve two existing buildings within 200 feet of the Green River, a shoreline of the State. The existing buildings owned by Wells Fargo are a former bank building used as a training facility and a data processing facility. The additional parking will provide overflow capacity for all the Wells Fargo facilities. The parcels are identified in the aerial photo on page 2. Attachment A is a set of plans including a copy of the site plan, and a copy of the landscaping plan. 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The Shoreline Master Program establishes three management environments adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Environment: An impact buffer area which provides for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. Low Impact Environment: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor A2/1/1 Qns.tAnnnfns• Rn..lna., s..i C..;f.. 14. //1/1 . T.. L... ;M TAbte.A ;.,..t..., 001 00 . D1....,... 7/)/. Al 7 7l. '70 - c..... 7/)6 A)1 7AAC L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Afations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 High Impact Environment: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below along with a discussion of the proposed project. City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: Overall Goals: 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats, which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. CL Page 2 of 12 12/04/2007 9:07:00 AM Q:\Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • Response: The proposed project is to construct a concrete tilt -up building that will be used for processing paper materials for Wells Fargo Bank. The stand alone parking area will provide overflow parking to support the existing Wells Fargo buildings (a training facility and another processing facility) as well as the new one. The project is located in an area of the City designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map as Tukwila Urban Center and is taking place on a parcel of land located within a small office /industrial park. Adjacent land uses consist of other industrial buildings within the industrial park, across the river is an office park and City of Kent park. The Green River Trail is located on the south side of the new building site and the east side of the new parking area. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site along the river. The project will not discharge storm water directly into the river or otherwise impact the shoreline environment. Given the nature of the development, the project will promote economic development through the construction of a new building which will house new jobs in the City, which is one aspect of enhancing the public interest. The new bank facility will employ 20 individuals initially and may employ up to 30 -35 individuals at maximum capacity. The project will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River — the river is not navigable in this portion of the river except for kayaks and canoes. There are no known culturally significant features on the site. The project will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) has identified a section of the riverbank damaged in the winter storms of 2006 just upstream from this site which is in need of immediate repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the COE to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. The width of the current levee easement does not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies the applicant has been requested to provide additional easement area to allow the levee to be set back at a maximum slope of2.5to 1. The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and to grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila (TMC 16.52.100 C.). Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require that the property owner grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If the additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The requested easement width is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The applicant has agreed to grant the additional easement area for the future levee repair. CL Page 3 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Economic Development Element Goals: Public Access Element Goals: • • Public access to the river is available on the Green River Trail, which runs along the top of the levee and borders both the building site and the parking lot site. This trail meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is enhanced. 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with shoreline goals and policies. Response: As noted above, the project will construct a 12,983 square foot office /warehouse building and a stand alone parking lot to support the existing wells Fargo buildings located in the same industrial complex. The project will generate construction jobs during the time the building is under construction and permanent employment for approximately 20 people initially and possibly up to 35 people at maximum capacity and to that extent enhances the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila. 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of Tukwila..... 4. Encourage public access to privately owned shorelines, consistent with private property rights. 5. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. Response: The goals of this section relate to providing public access to the river. There is a public trail system that runs the length of the Green River. In this portion of the river, the trail is located on the top of the levee that borders both development sites. A pedestrian trail has been worn into the undeveloped site as a short cut from S. 180 Street to the trail and bridge that crosses the river just upstream from the new building site. The applicant will provide a paved trail linking the public sidewalk to the trail to replace the informal trail that is already there. CL Page 4 of 12 11/29/2007 12 :38:00 PM Q: Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 View of informal trail looking toward S. 180 Street View of informal trail looking towards Green River & trail Circulation Element Goals: The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads or public facilities within the shoreline. Internal circulation will be provided to the new building in the Low Impact Environment of the shoreline via Sperry Drive. Recreational Element Goals: 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. Response: A public trail system runs along the Green River from Auburn to the City of Seattle, alternating sides of the river on which it is located. On this section of the river, the trail is located on the south side of the proposed new building on the top of the levee and to the east of the proposed new parking lot. The trail is used by pedestrians, bike riders and runners. As noted above, the applicant will pave the informal trail that links S. 180 Street with the bridge crossing the Green River and the trail on top of the levee just southwest of the site. Shoreline Use Element Goals: 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. CL Page 5 of 12 12/04/2007 9:07:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Conservation Element Goals: 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: • 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Response: The project site is located in an oxbow of the Green River. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Section 205 levee has been constructed along the left bank of this portion of the river. The proposed paper processing facility is consistent with the zoning and land use designation and is appropriate for its location in the office /industrial park. The proposed parking area to support the existing buildings is located on a separate parcel. The project is consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Two other facilities owned by Wells Fargo are located in the same industrial park; the development of the last 2 remaining parcels will provide efficiencies for the property owner. 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. Response: The natural character of the river in the area of the proposed project has been altered to a major extent due to the construction of the levee which provides flood protection throughout the urban center. Native plantings will be used in the landscape area located within the shoreline environment. Storm water from the site will be detained and then discharged to the P17 pond to the north. Current COE requirements do not permit planting trees and other vegetation on the levee or in the levee prism. Some time in the future the levee adjacent to the building site will be reconstructed to a less steep slope — this will provide an opportunity to include a bench that can be planted with vegetation that improves fish habitat. Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: CL Page 6 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q:\Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline StaffRpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed use, a paper processing facility is a permitted use in that zone. The Tukwila Board of Architectural will review the project at a public hearing to consider the design of the building and the landscaping plan. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 2, above is a discussion of the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; Response: No existing vegetation within the River Environment will be disturbed due to this project. The portion of the site immediately adjacent to the river is already developed with an existing paper processing building with associated parking and landscaping on the site perimeter. The levee bank adjacent to the river is covered with blackberries, but there is formal landscaping on the north side of the trail on the other side of the chain link fencing that adjoins the trail. The landscaping provided by the new development will be placed on the outside of the new fencing that will be installed. Native plants will be used in the shoreline area. S. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and will drain to the storm water pond just north of Costco. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. CL Page 7 of 12 1 1/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline StaffRpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected Response: Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be altered by the construction of this project. When the levee is reconstructed along this portion of the river, habitat opportunities will be improved by the addition of a bench that will be planted with trees that will provide shade and other plant materials that will enhance fish and wildlife habitat. 8. All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Response: A land altering permit will be required for this project. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be installed to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed to convey storm water from the site. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: No federal permits are required. The State Department of Ecology will review the shoreline permit. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is involved with this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: Solid waste will not be disposed along the river 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. CL Page 8 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • Response: The property owner will dedicate additional easement area to accommodate the set back of the levee in the future. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. Response: This project does not propose any landfilling within the river channel. /5. ... (R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: No trees within the shoreline environments will be removed from the site. One cottonwood tree, outside the shoreline, in the stand alone parking area will be removed to construct the parking lot. B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. River Environment uses are restricted to footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The River Environment on this site ends approximately behind the pedestrian/bicycle path. No improvements or development are proposed within the River Environment on this site. C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the river environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking/loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. The following development standards apply: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations. Response: No structures are located in the Low Impact Environment. Landscaping, parking and drive aisles are located in the low impact environment on this site. CL Page 9 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline StaffRpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking/loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; Response: Internal vehicle circulation to the rear of the building runs along the south side of the building. This internal circulation system is located more than 10 feet from the building. An access road for maintenance of the levee system is located along the top of the levee. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six-foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist), or c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: A cyclone fence with slats is proposed to run the length of the south side of the site connecting to the existing fencing. Landscaping, using native plants, will be placed on the outside of the fencing to help screen the site from view of the trail. The parking, drive aisles and the proposed new building are below the top of the levee and therefore mostly screened from view of anyone on the river; the building and parking area can be seen from the trail. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking/loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. 4. COMMENTS: • • Comments were received during the Notice of Application period from the Muckelshoot Indian Tribe (see pages 7 and 8 of Attachment B, SEPA staff report) The issues raised in the e-mail were addressed through the analysis of environmental impacts of the proposed project in the SEPA staff report. CL Page 10 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 5. SEPA: A determination of non - significance was issued on November 19, 2007. The comment/appeal period closed on December 3, 2007 at 5:00 p.m.; no appeals or comments were received on the DNS. A copy of the SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment B). CONCLUSIONS • 1. The project site is located in a light industrial park and is designated Tukwila Urban Center on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed project, a tilt up concrete building for paper processing is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use is a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building with a 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking for employees. The building will be used for processing paper. Adjacent uses consist of another building owned by Wells Fargo, also used for paper processing, light industrial buildings across the river to the south and big box retail located across S. 180 Street to the north. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site on the south and east along the river. 3. The project will promote economic development in the City, enhance the stability of the levee when it is reconstructed in the future, and will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. 4. There are no known culturally significant features on the site. Development of the site will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. 5. Public access is available on the south side of the site on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on the right and left banks of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. Pedestrians have worn an informal trail from the sidewalk on S. 180 Street to the bridge that crosses the Green River near the southwest corner of the site. The property owner will construct a paved path to formalize this connection to the trail. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: a) The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. b) No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; c) The project will not disrupt existing trees or vegetation within the river environment. No cottonwood trees within the river environment or low impact environment will be removed by this project. d) No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be detained on site and eventually will discharge into the detention pond just north of Costco. CL Page 11 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 6. RECOMMENDATION • • Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be used to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures during construction. e) The project will be required to comply with all state and federal water quality regulations. f) Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project. The easement being granted by the property owner to the King County Levee District will permit the eventual set back of the levee so that a planted vegetative bench can be established. g) All necessary permits will be obtained for this project. h) The project does not involve any dredging or mining. i) No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Additional easement area is needed to set the levee back at the correct slope to prevent future slumping. The applicant has agreed to grant this additional easement area. j) No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. The River Environment on this site includes the levee and Green River Trail and ends approximately on the north side of the trail. Any landscaping that falls in this environment will be comprised of native plants. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment provided item S.B. is complied with. a) The structure is sited according to the Tukwila Urban Center zone in which it is located. Landscaping is provided according to the requirements of that zone, with 15 feet in the front as well as more than 10 feet on the side along Sperry Drive and 10 feet on the rear along the Green River Trail. Native plant material will be used in the shoreline environments. Additional easement area will be dedicated to King County for reconstruction of the levee at a future date. b) Parking, loading and storage facilities will be screened from the river in the following ways: a cyclone fence with slats will run the length of the rear of the property, with the landscaping to be planted on the outside of the fence. Due to the levee, the parking area is located below the levee prism and hidden from view from the river. c) No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the Notice of Application period. Issues raised by these comments were addressed in the SEPA staff report. 10. A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on November 19, 2007; no comments or appeals were received by the 5:00 p.m. December 3, 2007 deadline. Approve the shoreline substantial development permit. CL Page 12 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q:\ Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline StaffRpt. doc Cizy of Tukwila • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director NOVEMBER 29, 2007 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank, has filed a design review application, L07 -037 to construct a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building and 5,682 square foot covered truck loading area and a stand alone parking lot with 56 stalls all within the shoreline of the Green River. The building site is 1.28 acres and the stand alone parking lot is .80 acres. The building site and stand alone parking lot are located in a small office /industrial park at Sperry Drive and S, 180 Street The office /industrial park iss developed with an aerospace industrial building and two other buildings owned and utilized by Wells Fargo. You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. before the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. The hearing will take place at Tukwila City Hall in the City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. To confirm the time and date of the hearing, please call the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 aim to 5:00 p.m. Other known required permits include: • Land Altering and Grading o Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, L07 -035 FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available for review at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development, located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Please call 431 -3670 to make sure the files will be available. Application filed: Notice of Completeness Issued: Notice of Application Issued: May 25, 2007 June 18, 2007 June 25, 2007 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor CL Page 1 of 1 11/28/2007 2 :39 :00 PM 0\W11 s F4IPOAPIIh1i0 Hearinn Notiss:doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 4E3: 1..212“ ..... rII.11.1101.1.11111111V•011aaJCAC Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I. J }� HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Number: tiTI—D? Notice of Public Hearing 44041 Determination of Non - Significance N otice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of QV- in the year 20 (YJ P:W DMINISTRATIVEFORMSWORMSWFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION Project Name: Project Number: tiTI—D? Mailer's Signature' 44041 Person requesting mailing:CAUL, Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of QV- in the year 20 (YJ P:W DMINISTRATIVEFORMSWORMSWFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION ( ) U.S. ARMY GUKF'b ur cr�uunccrw () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMI ' TION () DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DMSION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) 'TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT j) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY () OWEST () SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: --KPUBLIC WORKS () FIRE ()POUCE ()FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR () CITY CLERK ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: ADMTNISTRA 'TIVETORMMCHKLIST.D WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ,DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* () OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SITE MAPS WITH DECISION • SEND • SEND SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL 6} SW IC C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM 'FISHERIES PROGRAM AtI Y..04 wa( -c✓ ( ) WILDUFE PROGRAM MEDIA S eSS tun 15 /a4(en c rakf Avcittieutr l°lt 2 ' Avc.. 6 08 Saute_ ° 1 $I ( ) U.S. DEPT A H.U.D. ( ) NATIOINE FISHERIES SERVICE ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) KC. DEV & ENVOI SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES .(FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC UBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT 520 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT ; (S) RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA-TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF AU. APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISM WEN ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WVVW SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts allite of mailing) • Dept. of Ecology EnvironmentalMiew Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send Only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Applkatlon for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that writteni comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General 'Applicant . 'Indian Tribes , 'Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). 'Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documenb to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) . Shoreline Permit Application Forin (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map • SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:%ADMINISTRATIVENFORMSTHICLIST.DOC AMC FAMILY LLC PO BOX 2720 PORTLAND, OR 97208 EJT INC PO BOX 25080 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98093 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA, GA 30348 JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY L L 1001 KAMOKILA BLVD KAPOLEI, HI 96707 • • CASCADE TUKWILA LLC 7900 SE 28TH ST 3400 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 FIRST INTER BNK- KIRKLAND PO BOX 63931 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94163 HIGH BEECH LLC PO BOX 463 REDMOND, WA 98073 LILY POINTE INVESTMENTS 4128 W AMES LAKE DR NE REDMOND, WA 98053 EDWARDS,J MICHAEL 265 CAREFREE WAY FRIDAY HARBOR, WA 98250 GRAY CAT COLLECTIVE LLC 5430 45TH AVE W SEATTLE, WA 98199 HOUGHTON HARBOR LLC 1233 ANDOVER PARK E TUKWILA, WA 98188 NC POWER SYSTEMS CO 17900 W VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA 98188 SFP B LTD PTNRSHP TENANT TENANT OPO BOX 667 1228 ANDOVER PARK E 1230 ANDOVER PARK E PRINEVILLE, OR 97754 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 18123 72ND AVE S - 18235 OLYMPIC AVE S 18251 CASCADE AVE S KENT, WA 98032 TUKWILA, WA 98188 SEATTLE, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 18260 OLYMPIC AVE S 6700 RIVERSIDE DR 6750 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 SEATTLE, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 6801 S 180TH ST 6804 S 180TH ST 6810 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENA 6818 S 180TH ST 6820 S 180TH ST 6835 S 18 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWI 98188 TENANT TE T TUKWILA TT LLC 6847 S 180TH ST 7100 S 3RD ST 3300 MAPLE VALLEY HWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUK , A 98055 RENTON, WA 98058 Project Description: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank, Applicant Wells Fargo Bank, Owner, ATTN: Tom Dawes King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L07 -035 Applicant: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects for Wells Fargo Bank, Type of Permit Applied for: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt up building with associated parking and a stand alone over -flow parking lot, portions of which fall within the 200 foot shoreline environment. Location: 6855 S. 180 Street, Tukwila, WA Associated Files: L07 -037, Design Review; E07 -009 Comprehensive Plan Tukwila Urban Center Designation/Zoning Tukwila Urban Center District: CL n• \Wells garoa\! O7 -035 NOT) dos • Page 1 of 2 12/04/2007 10:17:00 AM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor December 4, 2007 II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: X determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS). Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone! 206 - 4.31 -1670 • Fax! 206 -4. ?1 ?66S L07 -035 Wells Fargo Shorelineditstantial Development Permit Notice of Decision December 4, 2007 The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. The land use application for design review on this project is pending; a public hearing before the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will be held on this application Thursday, December 13, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS One administrative appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board of the Decision is permitted. Any person appealing to the Shorelines Hearings Board may raise certain SEPA issues as part of the appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appellants should consult the rules and procedures of the Shorelines Hearings Board for details. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING The requirements and procedures for appeals to the Shorelines Hearings Board are set forth in RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period unless an appeal is filed. V. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Department of Community Development City of Tukwila CL Q:\ Wells Fargo1L07 -035 NOD.doc Page 2 of 2 12/04/2007 11:07:00 AM File Number: L07 -035 Applied: 05/25/2007 Approved: 12/04/2007 Expiration: 12/04/2009 City ATukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http://wwwatukwila.wa.us SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT A permit is hereby granted to: JESSICA BRADLEY, FOR WELLS FARGO BANK to: Construct new 12,983 sq. ft. tilt up concrete building for storage of paper products. 5,682 sf covered truck loading for distribution of product on parcel A. Parcel B is stand alone over flow parking lot for 56 cars. Upor the following property: Address: 6855 S 180 ST TUKW Parcel Number: 3623049095 Section/Township /Range: 36 -23 -04 The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: Promote reasonable & appropriate use of shorelines; encourage econ. develop. & public access. Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and any conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173-14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERNIINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may only be appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within 21 -days from the filing of this permit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For more detail information on appeals, refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. Dat doc: SHORELINE5 Jack ace, Director of Department of Community Development Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two (2) years from the effective date of the permit (the date the permit is filed with D.O.E.), per RCW 90.58.143(4). to Printed 1•_ld29M7 1 • Ciy of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 20007 TO: Jack Pace, Director, Department of Community Development FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner RE: Shoreline Permit: L07 -035 Wells Fargo CV Operations Building 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: • The project involves the construction of a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building with a 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking for storage and sorting /processing of paper products and a separate parking lot to serve two existing buildings within 200 feet of the Green River, a shoreline of the State. The existing buildings owned by Wells Fargo are a former bank building used as a training facility and a data processing facility. The additional parking will provide overflow capacity for all the Wells Fargo facilities. The parcels are identified in the aerial photo on page 2. Attachment A is a set of plans including a copy of the site plan, and a copy of the landscaping plan. The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The Shoreline Master Program establishes three management environments adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Environment: An impact buffer area which provides for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. Low Impact Environment: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard_ Suite #100 • Tukwila Wa OR1RR • Phnno• 2nfi_4 21.2A7n • P2V. 21M_d 21.2Af, L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV OPtions Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 High Impact Environment: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below along with a discussion of the proposed project. City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: Overall Goals: 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats, which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. CL Page 2 of 12 12/04/2007 9:07:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Response: The proposed project is to construct a concrete tilt -up building that will be used for processing paper materials for Wells Fargo Bank. The stand alone parking area will provide overflow parking to support the existing Wells Fargo buildings (a training facility and another processing facility) as well as the new one. The project is located in an area of the City designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map as Tukwila Urban Center and is taking place on a parcel of land located within a small office /industrial park. Adjacent land uses consist of other industrial buildings within the industrial park, across the river is an office park and City of Kent park. The Green River Trail is located on the south side of the new building site and the east side of the new parking area. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site along the river. The project will not discharge storm water directly into the river or otherwise impact the shoreline environment. Given the nature of the development, the project will promote economic development through the construction of a new building which will house new jobs in the City, which is one aspect of enhancing the public interest. The new bank facility will employ 20 individuals initially and may employ up to 30 -35 individuals at maximum capacity. The project will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River — the river is not navigable in this portion of the river except for kayaks and canoes. There are no known culturally significant features on the site. The project will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) has identified a section of the riverbank damaged in the winter storms of 2006 just upstream from this site which is in need of immediate repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the COE to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. The width of the current levee easement does not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies the applicant has been requested to provide additional easement area to allow the levee to be set back at a maximum slope of 2.5 to 1. The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and to grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila (TMC 16.52.100 C.). Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require that the property owner grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If the additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The requested easement width is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The applicant has agreed to grant the additional easement area for the future levee repair. CL Page 3 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • Public access to the river is available on the Green River Trail, which runs along the top of the levee and borders both the building site and the parking lot site. This trail meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. Economic Development Element Goals: 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is enhanced. 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with shoreline goals and policies. Response: As noted above, the project will construct a 12,983 square foot office /warehouse building and a stand alone parking lot to support the existing wells Fargo buildings located in the same industrial complex. The project will generate construction jobs during the time the building is under construction and permanent employment for approximately 20 people initially and possibly up to 35 people at maximum capacity and to that extent enhances the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila. Public Access Element Goals: 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of Tukwila..... 4. Encourage public access to privately owned shorelines, consistent with private property rights. 5. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. Response: The goals of this section relate to providing public access to the river. There is a public trail system that runs the length of the Green River. In this portion of the river, the trail is located on the top of the levee that borders both development sites. A pedestrian trail has been worn into the undeveloped site as a short cut from S. 180 Street to the trail and bridge that crosses the river just upstream from the new building site. The applicant will provide a paved trail linking the public sidewalk to the trail to replace the informal trail that is already there. CL Page 4 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q :\Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 View of informal trail looking toward S. 180 Street View of informal trail looking towards Green River & trail Circulation Element Goals: The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads or public facilities within the shoreline. Internal circulation will be provided to the new building in the Low Impact Environment of the shoreline via Sperry Drive. Recreational Element Goals: 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. Response: A public trail system runs along the Green River from Auburn to the City of Seattle, alternating sides of the river on which it is located. On this section of the river, the trail is located on the south side of the proposed new building on the top of the levee and to the east of the proposed new parking lot. The trail is used by pedestrians, bike riders and runners. As noted above, the applicant will pave the informal trail that links S. 180 Street with the bridge crossing the Green River and the trail on top of the levee just southwest of the site. Shoreline Use Element Goals: 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. CL Page 5 of 12 12/04/2007 9:07:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo\L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Conservation Element Goals: 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: • 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Response: The project site is located in an oxbow of the Green River. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Section 205 levee has been constructed along the left bank of this portion of the river. The proposed paper processing facility is consistent with the zoning and land use designation and is appropriate for its location in the office /industrial park. The proposed parking area to support the existing buildings is located on a separate parcel. The project is consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Two other facilities owned by Wells Fargo are located in the same industrial park; the development of the last 2 remaining parcels will provide efficiencies for the property owner. 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. Response: The natural character of the river in the area of the proposed project has been altered to a major extent due to the construction of the levee which provides flood protection throughout the urban center. Native plantings will be used in the landscape area located within the shoreline environment. Storm water from the site will be detained and then discharged to the P17 pond to the north. Current COE requirements do not permit planting trees and other vegetation on the levee or in the levee prism. Some time in the future the levee adjacent to the building site will be reconstructed to a less steep slope — this will provide an opportunity to include a bench that can be planted with vegetation that improves fish habitat. Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: CL Page 6 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo'L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 • • 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed use, a paper processing facility is a permitted use in that zone. The Tukwila Board of Architectural will review the project at a public hearing to consider the design of the building and the landscaping plan. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 2, above is a discussion of the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; Response: No existing vegetation within the River Environment will be disturbed due to this project. The portion of the site immediately adjacent to the river is already developed with an existing paper processing building with associated parking and landscaping on the site perimeter. The levee bank adjacent to the river is covered with blackberries, but there is formal landscaping on the north side of the trail on the other side of the chain link fencing that adjoins the trail. The landscaping provided by the new development will be placed on the outside of the new fencing that will be installed. Native plants will be used in the shoreline area. S. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and will drain to the storm water pond just north of Costco. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. CL Page 7 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be altered by the construction of this project. When the levee is reconstructed along this portion of the river, habitat opportunities will be improved by the addition of a bench that will be planted with trees that will provide shade and other plant materials that will enhance fish and wildlife habitat. 8. All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Response: A land altering permit will be required for this project. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be installed to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. New catch basins will be installed to convey storm water from the site. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: No federal permits are required. The State Department of Ecology will review the shoreline permit. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is involved with this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: Solid waste will not be disposed along the river 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. CL Page 8 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q:\ Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Response: The property owner will dedicate additional easement area to accommodate the set back of the levee in the future. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. Response: This project does not propose any landfilling within the river channel. 15. ... (R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: No trees within the shoreline environments will be removed from the site. One cottonwood tree, outside the shoreline, in the stand alone parking area will be removed to construct the parking lot. B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. River Environment uses are restricted to footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The River Environment on this site ends approximately behind the pedestrian/bicycle path. No improvements or development are proposed within the River Environment on this site. C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the river environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking/loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. The following development standards apply: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations. Response: No structures are located in the Low Impact Environment. Landscaping, parking and drive aisles are located in the low impact environment on this site. CL Page 9 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking/loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; Response: Internal vehicle circulation to the rear of the building runs along the south side of the building. This internal circulation system is located more than 10 feet from the building. An access road for maintenance of the levee system is located along the top of the levee. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six-foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d. Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: A cyclone fence with slats is proposed to run the length of the south side of the site connecting to the existing fencing. Landscaping, using native plants, will be placed on the outside of the fencing to help screen the site from view of the trail. The parking, drive aisles and the proposed new building are below the top of the levee and therefore mostly screened from view of anyone on the river; the building and parking area can be seen from the trail. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking/loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. 4. COMMENTS: Comments were received during the Notice of Application period from the Muckelshoot Indian Tribe (see pages 7 and 8 of Attachment B, SEPA staff report) The issues raised in the e-mail were addressed through the analysis of environmental impacts of the proposed project in the SEPA staff report. CL Page 10 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q:\ Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV Operations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 5. SEPA: • A determination of non - significance was issued on November 19, 2007. The comment/appeal period closed on December 3, 2007 at 5:00 p.m.; no appeals or comments were received on the DNS. A copy of the SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment B). CONCLUSIONS 1. The project site is located in a light industrial park and is designated Tukwila Urban Center on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed project, a tilt up concrete building for paper processing is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use is a 12,983 square foot concrete tilt -up building with a 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking for employees. The building will be used for processing paper. Adjacent uses consist of another building owned by Wells Fargo, also used for paper processing, light industrial buildings across the river to the south and big box retail located across S. 180 Street to the north. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee runs the length of the site on the south and east along the river. 3. The project will promote economic development in the City, enhance the stability of the levee when it is reconstructed in the future, and will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. 4. There are no known culturally significant features on the site. Development of the site will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. 5. Public access is available on the south side of the site on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on the right and left banks of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. Pedestrians have worn an informal trail from the sidewalk on S. 180 Street to the bridge that crosses the Green River near the southwest corner of the site. The property owner will construct a paved path to formalize this connection to the trail. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: a) The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. b) No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; c) The project will not disrupt existing trees or vegetation within the river environment. No cottonwood trees within the river environment or low impact environment will be removed by this project. d) No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be detained on site and eventually will discharge into the detention pond just north of Costco. CL Page 11 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc L07 -035: Wells Fargo CV trations Bldg. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit December 4, 2007 Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be used to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures during construction. e) The project will be required to comply with all state and federal water quality regulations. f) Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project. The easement being granted by the property owner to the King County Levee District will permit the eventual set back of the levee so that a planted vegetative bench can be established. g) All necessary permits will be obtained for this project. h) The project does not involve any dredging or mining. i) No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Additional easement area is needed to set the levee back at the correct slope to prevent future slumping. The applicant has agreed to grant this additional easement area. j) No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. The River Environment on this site includes the levee and Green River Trail and ends approximately on the north side of the trail. Any landscaping that falls in this environment will be comprised of native plants. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment provided item 8.B. is complied with. a) The structure is sited according to the Tukwila Urban Center zone in which it is located. Landscaping is provided according to the requirements of that zone, with 15 feet in the front as well as more than 10 feet on the side along Sperry Drive and 10 feet on the rear along the Green River Trail. Native plant material will be used in the shoreline environments. Additional easement area will be dedicated to King County for reconstruction of the levee at a future date. b) Parking, loading and storage facilities will be screened from the river in the following ways: a cyclone fence with slats will run the length of the rear of the property, with the landscaping to be planted on the outside of the fence. Due to the levee, the parking area is located below the levee prism and hidden from view from the river. c) No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the Notice of Application period. Issues raised by these comments were addressed in the SEPA staff report. 10. A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on November 19, 2007; no comments or appeals were received by the 5:00 p.m. December 3, 2007 deadline. 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the shoreline substantial development permit. CL Page 12 of 12 11/29/2007 12:38:00 PM Q: Wells Fargo1L07 -035 Shoreline Staff Rpt. doc November 19, 2007 To: Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects Tom Dawes, Project Manager, Wells Fargo Bank Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor LOCATION: PROJECT: FILE NUMBERS: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: CL T....�.. \ T711'7 nnn AVITI d.... City of Tukwila NOTICE OF DECISION Department of Community Development Wells Fargo CV Operations Building and Parking Lot E07 -009 L07 -035 (Shoreline Permit), L07 -037 (Design Review) Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, for Wells Fargo Bank Construct a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up building and a 56 stall stand -alone parking lot on two separate parcels, both of which fall within the shoreline of the Green River. S. 180 Street and Sperry Drive This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non - significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3661 for further information. This decision is appealable to King County Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). Page 1 of 1 11/19/2007 1:52:00 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: Applicant: JESSICA BRADLEY Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township /Range: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http://www.citukwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E07 -009 05/25/2007 11/19/2007 ISSUED 6855 S 180 ST TUKW 3623049095 36 -23-04 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: 12,983 sf of new tilt up concrete building for storage of paper products. 5682 sf covered truck loading for distribution of product. Parcel B is parking lot for 56 cars. The I 'ity has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 lc.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental chec <list and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Oa- 3 , 2-w-1 The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. )', Dr) Jack Pac espons le icial Date City of Tuila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The, State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of actioi unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, C a ✓o l w a HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing v 1 � Determination of Non - Significance -et v-A L 0 era4 - 1 . 0n N 6(614 Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's Signature: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this II day of Naler4141 the year 20 a r■ PAADMINISTRATIVEFORMSWfRMs & msvrmmwrQmrrrrnw Project Name: WeA s -et v-A L 0 era4 - 1 . 0n N 6(614 Project Number: E D'1- oo ol Mailer's Signature: 64(44,( D ww✓f Person requesting mailing: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this II day of Naler4141 the year 20 a r■ PAADMINISTRATIVEFORMSWfRMs & msvrmmwrQmrrrrnw kUSA'' CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMI TION () DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF FISHERIS TRADE WILDUFEO DEV. ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT 811 O FIRE DISTRICT 82 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DMSION ( ) KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT -1UICINI �U�BRARY O NON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY - () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY ( ) INVEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY UGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) IMMUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT&T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT DEPARTMENTS: ( )( PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE () POLICE () FINANCE () PLANNING ( ) BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ' MCHAMBER C �ERCE 7 ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM .FISHERIES PROGRAM (. IfN : IZa✓fin Wtti k'6 ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: MDMINISTRATIVEWORMS \CEIXUS't'.DOC (ti 32 F�Jvr �"^� , Su<te 90s . W)A- g?j01 KING COUNTY AGENCIES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES MEDIA N.,. GPM Wrwnmcn !FN.. r ..v . w ..v.. r•v�..v . () U.S. DEPT () NATIONAL WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV 14 DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DMSION• ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKUST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION ( ) HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE , 101CC DE dr E MI SERVICESSEPA INFO CNTR ( ) KC. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL 14K-G: LAND &'WATER RESOURCES dQSTER`UBRAR1 ) ICC PUBUC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHUNE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT 820 ( ) WATER DISTRICT *125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT • j;«f 1= PaN NING` • � ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF AU. SEATTLE RELATED MG PROJ. IK INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON OUINAMISK RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CLTUKWILAWA.US.VWWV Sru.Nj r 1—. o R IOT' DuS I r Theuss t: t4S k KOMI 1; .U.D. INE FISHERIES SERVICE 1014 Do-wt °`"` frunsayv L JLW W • s o 071 ThLvd r rwlz y a (O"W January 15, 2008 Ms. Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 39015 172 Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 RE: December 21, 2007 Comments on Wells Fargo Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Dear Karen: • Guy of Tu • Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Thank you for the additional comments you provided on the shoreline substantial development permit that was issued on the Wells Fargo development proposed on the south side of S. 180 Street and Sperry Drive. I wanted to address briefly your comments which are copied below; the City's response follows after your comment. 1. The location and size of the proposed parking area and new building within the shoreline management zone could permanently preclude the actions needed to repair the levee in the project vicinity that failed in the 2006 storms such that the levee repair is the least environmentally damaging approach and actually restores river and riparian functions for the Green River. We have experienced several levee repair projects where "partial" restorative actions occurred because of existing infrastructure that could not be moved or modified. Response: We have no regulatory authority to prohibit development on this site; we will obtain additional easement area for setting back the levee at a future time, under the authority granted in TMC 16.52.100 C. At the time funding is available to set the levee back, we will address the redistribution of parking for the site. The project was re- designed to move the location of the underground storm water vault out of the future levee set back area to avoid conflicts in the future. 2. Please note that there are listed salmonid species in the project area including chinook, steelhead and coho (a species of concern). There may also be foraging CL Q: \Wells Fargo \Walters.doc Page 1 of 2 01/15/2008 5:37:00 PM Jim Haggerton, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 08188 • Phnne. 206 -4.11 - 1670 • FAY. 2ni5- 411 - 1h,S Ms. Karen Walters Muckleshoot Indian Tribe January 15, 2008 Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner bull trout in the area too. Again, the concern is that this project will limit opportunities to restore habitat for these and other salmonids species. Response: comment noted. • • 3. The planting plan is also proposing to plant all non - native tree species (i.e. Swedish Columnar aspen) within 200 feet of the green River. These tree species should be replaced with native trees capable of growing on the soil types at the site. See http : / /dnr.metrokc.gov /wlr/PI /Go- Native /index.aspx for a list of native trees and shrubs that should be used. Response: the Swedish Columnar aspen are no longer being planted; in the area immediately next to the river, all the plant material is native except for the Mahonia Aquifolium `Compacta' — a native species of this shrub will be required. A non - native tree is being used in the parking area that is not immediately adjacent to the river (Ginko Biloba `Autumn Gold'). We will talk with the landscape architect about substituting a native tree that fits the landscape plan's color palette for this portion of the site. 4. The project should maximize water quality treatment on site as much as possible to avoid adding stormwater pollutants to existing stormwater facilities and causing additional pollution loading to the Green River. Response: comment noted. The project will meet the City's adopted storm water regulations. Thank you for your comments. If you have any questions, please let me know. I can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. cc: Minnie Dhaliwal, Acting Planning Supervisor Jessica Bradley, Project Manager, Craft Architects CL Page 2 of 2 01/15/2008 5:37:00 PM Q: Wells Fargo\Walters.doc HILL & INGMAN CONSULTING SEATTLE. ENGINEERS WASHINGTON ' g V g i 0 Calculi Spacial MI-1 and Top of Dika vo= een tan. 9 3o - '6y P ov, li 1 [ N1 CITY OF. TUKWILA RIVERS BEND 000126 UTILITY DEVELOPEMENT 1WRQONTAL vesncu SCALES I'_ w i•_tC MO. ' 1/ 2 I9GI. N. 4406-61-50 SPERRY DR. evsr INgez;zzs7/444, !•• zawarNivirrose.e" . 107 , c/A 0 (enzw). I • ' SPECIAL31 -7 , - 5EE:3i-IT 2/2 • ..; /NI( 14/455 CIL st;tooe /Mf Er2.6r0 , . N Ntf 'canny_ • 0- p -----... 'Nerr771 - 17,Y - ESII.77. 1 ■) A 03 tl. 3.0N V ,14 fit - 732 13 0 " • ::!.!!' -"'"" "'"' - Nrld C.45 atar;?1, /A/I' FL8OQ 1 , _ I i. Il . „ j :", ; . i b.: :• i •, ,. II: . : . 1 • ; ! .., •• . . • • ., ! '1'! 1.: - • 11. L'- 1 ,- :' r,-1 . I !. . 1 - -I. - 1.1',. ::•Hi •.:1,_.!..I'...: .'...1::...... 1 1 I 1 '. ' 1 : I ‘!!! 1 l ' ; ' ' '• - .:'", ' '....H. i .; ' 1::', . :I . 1, . 1 ... . ''.I I I I i l , ..!. 1 ... . '; ' i 1.1 „ HITil 111'. 1; '• , ! : : , • . ; : :•,.:.• II 1r, . • :, 1i1 . " ' I, I L il I I I .L : . i ILI ": ' •'• I "" " _ 1 it ;I I i" II 1 ,1 1.: 1 ..i , • ' i ).. . 11.i.... I ..1 r 1 r, 1 11 ti ;' L I I; :di 'III f i 11 ,, i t' ; • ., . , -- - i '. .II-I- I - 1 11 i• I i ." 1 ,..'; 1 1 r ['LI I ,•' ;• I . I Ii i , 1 [ il .t.[.i. I ■ 1 i '• ; ..,...,.., i . T ....! 1 ' . 1 -1 I ft I f I irl HI •1, ; !, !!'; i!::''''•': ...I. r .I.. L. I ' -; • i • - 4i. k 4 ; ) , 1 HA- l• • v; + v iv ... , • - i .• - • 4 r.r H i l 1 !, 1 1 h Hill 1 : 11 :' T 1 ; 1 ! :,,, • • , L 1 I 'L ''''' 1 1 H ' ; il ;•',..:;': 1 Li 1 :...: i i:•:•': ; I II . 1" . ■ ' I 1 , ' I 'ti. •,;•[ --I •• 4 : , I , ; '• • • • i / i l 1 I • I ' - • ,,, ., I . ! . i ... .. i I c',, - ",...: - t'• - i 1 11 • , 111 il _, 1;..1'' ' ' . 0 HI I , ;L..' Li 1 ._ I ; I I : 1 1 I -1' ,,,1,1 : _.. . .•,'_'.. . ...r • I [ I 1 1 ‘ i I ‚ I i .... 1. 1. , IL ..1,,L, ii : 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 - , 11 - 1 , L. • i Iii ._ *; ,,, . 1 I Ii I II! -i.!, - 1.4 1 ,.... i : , 1 J LI !,I_ IL, •..,,.,... ii ! T ' . i i i i ! 11 X) I '., II :: ;•• -1 , : -1• 1 • .; : i, id: i iii! 1 :•;...; ; - • - , II• '• 1 • !: , ; • . 11 . , . - ••• I --.-- 1 - 1. ..1 - I' • --- ;.. • ; 1 : 1.; ' II:: 1 :..... ! . • : I, ! ' :I : . ••• II; 1 : ti, ,, .. I ';';' '•• III . ' : ' ' I . . 11 .. I 1, , I • , 1 '... . .. ! ' .' I 1 : 1 1 i H I 11 ; : I . 1 . .. i : 1 1 ; . ; . . 1 1 I. 1 ' 1 1 : . 1 1 • . .I, 1 1 I I ' , 1 . 1 1 1 1 ; r. .., 1 ! ' i i : : j 1 '' ' 1 1 •-•• *1 ' : I 1 i . , ; ; . • 1 1 i r i 1 111 I : 1 ■ I i : • j : 1 . 1 1 ! :. • ' • 1 1 . ‘ . 1 • ' - 1 ':' -L ; • • I 1 ; 1 1 i .; -.'• 1. 1 • • I • i 1 ' 1 1 ■ 1 1) i ' ; ! I % ! . • 1 - i ■ ; . ' • • ' , 'i t ' • . , I I ; • 1 1 . 1 . : ! . t. ... ! . i . ; ' 1 ''''1 ■ . .. 11.1. I: li . . • ' -:‘' ...1 .. 1; •,.I 1 '...''' . •: •. 1 , • ' .1 •....!: '," i: . ';',..',' ' . ..1 1: 'II I ••• : .•;::.:, :v.; ., •. : : .. ... H : ' ;;,' :1 Hi' H!,1• ....! ! :.1'. ..;•: 1 ' 11.1: 1 ...... :-• . .: v:1T iv!! '1:• •1 1 • l i t I •-• 1, •;: , ::•"; " .."• ! 1 .' !. - - •. :.•,•,. 1 . : ; , 1!-. 1 1- 1 . 1 1 1 1- ! i 111.II III !..L ,..' ,.; ::.. I 111.;..: :; j •,4.•:-.-- 1 H. ;.•'1 . 111: .11 ji' 1! 1 II !I : I, I. 111', 11 ij :,.! , 1 ,1 :, 1,111:!..:t .1•:!_ II, I ' i II .1:: ii H: I ' I.,: I i . 1 '11.1, ii : ;1 , :i.j1 7 •;i:11: • 1 II .i• ■ • I • . 1 . 1 .L. i 1 ; • . ; • .11'; I ,.‘: 1 WOMAN% Aft 010 0111fi1 Ilt,LIAffe_MMAIN_ rfbalb r gx $11/0V11 XNHO n01011110 railtraini 44 Ni' "1 Nat'l(' 11010.1 IWO AI Siva Al SPERRY DR. evsr INgez;zzs7/444, !•• zawarNivirrose.e" . 107 , c/A 0 (enzw). I • ' SPECIAL31 -7 , - 5EE:3i-IT 2/2 • ..; /NI( 14/455 CIL st;tooe /Mf Er2.6r0 , . N Ntf 'canny_ • 0- p -----... 'Nerr771 - 17,Y - ESII.77. 1 ■) A 03 tl. 3.0N V ,14 fit - 732 13 0 " • ::!.!!' -"'"" "'"' - Nrld C.45 atar;?1, /A/I' FL8OQ 1 , _ I i. Il . „ j :", ; . i b.: :• i •, ,. II: . : . 1 • ; ! .., •• . . • • ., ! '1'! 1.: - • 11. L'- 1 ,- :' r,-1 . I !. . 1 - -I. - 1.1',. ::•Hi •.:1,_.!..I'...: .'...1::...... 1 1 I 1 '. ' 1 : I ‘!!! 1 l ' ; ' ' '• - .:'", ' '....H. i .; ' 1::', . :I . 1, . 1 ... . ''.I I I I i l , ..!. 1 ... . '; ' i 1.1 „ HITil 111'. 1; '• , ! : : , • . ; : :•,.:.• II 1r, . • :, 1i1 . " ' I, I L il I I I .L : . i ILI ": ' •'• I "" " _ 1 it ;I I i" II 1 ,1 1.: 1 ..i , • ' i ).. . 11.i.... I ..1 r 1 r, 1 11 ti ;' L I I; :di 'III f i 11 ,, i t' ; • ., . , -- - i '. .II-I- I - 1 11 i• I i ." 1 ,..'; 1 1 r ['LI I ,•' ;• I . I Ii i , 1 [ il .t.[.i. I ■ 1 i '• ; ..,...,.., i . T ....! 1 ' . 1 -1 I ft I f I irl HI •1, ; !, !!'; i!::''''•': ...I. r .I.. L. I ' -; • i • - 4i. k 4 ; ) , 1 HA- l• • v; + v iv ... , • - i .• - • 4 r.r H i l 1 !, 1 1 h Hill 1 : 11 :' T 1 ; 1 ! :,,, • • , L 1 I 'L ''''' 1 1 H ' ; il ;•',..:;': 1 Li 1 :...: i i:•:•': ; I II . 1" . ■ ' I 1 , ' I 'ti. •,;•[ --I •• 4 : , I , ; '• • • • i / i l 1 I • I ' - • ,,, ., I . ! . i ... .. i I c',, - ",...: - t'• - i 1 11 • , 111 il _, 1;..1'' ' ' . 0 HI I , ;L..' Li 1 ._ I ; I I : 1 1 I -1' ,,,1,1 : _.. . .•,'_'.. . ...r • I [ I 1 1 ‘ i I ‚ I i .... 1. 1. , IL ..1,,L, ii : 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 - , 11 - 1 , L. • i Iii ._ *; ,,, . 1 I Ii I II! -i.!, - 1.4 1 ,.... i : , 1 J LI !,I_ IL, •..,,.,... ii ! T ' . i i i i ! 11 X) I '., II :: ;•• -1 , : -1• 1 • .; : i, id: i iii! 1 :•;...; ; - • - , II• '• 1 • !: , ; • . 11 . , . - ••• I --.-- 1 - 1. ..1 - I' • --- ;.. • ; 1 : 1.; ' II:: 1 :..... ! . • : I, ! ' :I : . ••• II; 1 : ti, ,, .. I ';';' '•• III . ' : ' ' I . . 11 .. I 1, , I • , 1 '... . .. ! ' .' I 1 : 1 1 i H I 11 ; : I . 1 . .. i : 1 1 ; . ; . . 1 1 I. 1 ' 1 1 : . 1 1 • . .I, 1 1 I I ' , 1 . 1 1 1 1 ; r. .., 1 ! ' i i : : j 1 '' ' 1 1 •-•• *1 ' : I 1 i . , ; ; . • 1 1 i r i 1 111 I : 1 ■ I i : • j : 1 . 1 1 ! :. • ' • 1 1 . ‘ . 1 • ' - 1 ':' -L ; • • I 1 ; 1 1 i .; -.'• 1. 1 • • I • i 1 ' 1 1 ■ 1 1) i ' ; ! I % ! . • 1 - i ■ ; . ' • • ' , 'i t ' • . , I I ; • 1 1 . 1 . : ! . t. ... ! . i . ; ' 1 ''''1 ■ . .. 11.1. I: li . . • ' -:‘' ...1 .. 1; •,.I 1 '...''' . •: •. 1 , • ' .1 •....!: '," i: . ';',..',' ' . ..1 1: 'II I ••• : .•;::.:, :v.; ., •. : : .. ... H : ' ;;,' :1 Hi' H!,1• ....! ! :.1'. ..;•: 1 ' 11.1: 1 ...... :-• . .: v:1T iv!! '1:• •1 1 • l i t I •-• 1, •;: , ::•"; " .."• ! 1 .' !. - - •. :.•,•,. 1 . : ; , 1!-. 1 1- 1 . 1 1 1 1- ! i 111.II III !..L ,..' ,.; ::.. I 111.;..: :; j •,4.•:-.-- 1 H. ;.•'1 . 111: .11 ji' 1! 1 II !I : I, I. 111', 11 ij :,.! , 1 ,1 :, 1,111:!..:t .1•:!_ II, I ' i II .1:: ii H: I ' I.,: I i . 1 '11.1, ii : ;1 , :i.j1 7 •;i:11: • 1 II .i• ■ • I • . 1 . 1 .L. i 1 ; • . ; • .11'; I ,.‘: 1 C.ia•l.L�nb - RE: Wells Fargo - metal pj els From: "Jessica Bradley" <jessica @craftarchitects.com> To: "'Carol Lumb "' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/06/2007 2:06 pm Subject: RE: Wells Fargo - metal panels Yes, that is also part of the impact - the 10.5" panels are heavier, thus requiring different foundations and different equipment to install. Best regards, Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:47 AM To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Subject: RE: Wells Fargo - metal panels Jessica: thank you for the explanation - I will incorporate the information into the staff report. I think I remember from the telephone conversation with you and Kathy that one of the issues with the spandrel panel and the increase in the thickness of the concrete (and weight of the wall) was it affected the type of crane that could be used to lift the panels into place? is that correct? I will mark up the Landscape Notes sheet, hopefully this afternoon, and have a courier bring it to your offices. Carol »> "Jessica Bradley" <jessica @craftarchitects.com> 12/06/2007 10:29 am »> Carol: To follow -up our phone conversation this morning, please accept this additional information about the metal panels used to simulate windows. They will be Dark Bronze in color. Perforated with square perforations, 3/4" holes, 1" on center - to give texture. Surrounded in a frame, +/- 1" thick - to give thickness to the panel. Stand off of the face of the building 1" to 2" - to give depth. Switching to a spandrel panel will cause our concrete panels to increase in thickness from 8" to 10.5" and as a result incur significant additional cost. We believe these panels provide a similar effect to a spandrel panel and will not 'confuse' pedestrians or motorists. Best regards, Jessica Bradley and Kathy Craft Original Message gel j L Carol. Lumb - RE: Wells Fargo - metal panels From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 5:34 PM To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Subject: Wells Fargo Hi Jessica: I hope you are feeling better - I tried to reach you today to discuss a couple details about the building design. Now that I have a draft of the design review staff report prepared, I've got several items that I wanted to discuss with you. I will identify them below so you can review them before we talk. 1) The building elevation illustrations of the metal panels that are substituting for windows give the appearance of depth and also texture, but the metal sample seems too thin to provide any illusion of a window in this space and it has no texture to it. We would like to see a spandrel window used in place of the metal panels on the outside of the building if you want to have a design feature that mimics a window. The Segale building west of this site used this type of window (I think I included some photos of this building with my July letter). 2) Fencing: Is the fencing being used to keep unauthorized people off the property or is the goal to obscure from view any activity that is taking place on the site? I was incorrect in my July 30th letter when said you must use wood slats - the black vinyl coated chain link fence will prevent access to the site and will also allow the fence to blend in to the background. The slats just draw more attention to the fence and over time break and become unsightly. If the goal is to obscure activity on the site, then the masonry wall that begins on the north must be continued around the corner on the west side of the site and also used on the south side where the truck entrance is located. 3) At the building permit stage, the landscaping plan must include some evergreen trees along the front to provide some trees that will be green year- round. I will also have some corrections for the notes on sheet L -2 but they can be addressed at the building permit stage (they aren't design related, so the Planning Commission doesn't need to review). Give me a call when you get a chance. The Planning Commission packets must be mailed on Friday, so hopefully we can talk early in the day Thursday. Carol at) 10 Vfizki c_ e -w.w l t �x�'��P.i,., re �-. u) N o d-eu,., ( O -0- 1 9 0 % a✓ te-L_ r1 p LAJ f C neck +0 & 2— T ✓u�d . V 4 C') 4 Uu � .9.. %AIL, '°""- 4- • .t JIenJ1.4 ✓1 w l�N� D — nJ \) S (4.h Si c. 8r DG Lv 9 A- w..9 -r& Gh U w u/ JPvl c,✓ rv'aWA4- koc-._ alt ,L _ - _ 0A)14- -- - ( 1/4AANLAI ' - ._ . ----- `'- m= ' °~� I! Carol Lumb - WellsFargo From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Jessica: Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 12/05/2007 5:34 pm Wells Fargo I hope you are feeling better - I tried to reach you today t design. Now that I have a draft of the design review staff wanted to discuss with you. I will identify them below so 1) The building elevation illustrations of the metal panels hat are substituting for windows give the appearance of depth and also texture, but the metal sample seems too thin to provide any illusion of a window in this space and it has no texture to it. We would like to see a spandrel window used in place of the metal panels on the outside of the building if you want to have a design feature that mimics a window. The Segale building west of this site used this type of window (I think I included some photos of this building with my July letter). 2) Fencing: Is the fencing being used to keep unauthorized people off the property or is the goal to obscure from view any activity that is taking place on the site? I was incorrect in my July 30th letter when I said you must use wood slats - the black vinyl coated chain link fence will prevent access to the site and will also allow the fence to blend in to the background. The slats just draw more attention to the fence and over time break and become unsightly. If the goal is to obscure activity on the site, then the asonry wall that begins on the north must be continued around the corner on the west side of the site and also used on the south side where the truck entrance is located. 3) At the building permit stage, the landscaping plan must include some evergreen trees along the front to provide some trees that will be green year- round. I will also have some corrections for the notes on sheet L -2 but they can be addressed at the building permit stage (they aren't design related, so the Planning Commission doesn't need to review). Give me a call when you get a chance. The Planning Commission packets must be mailed on Friday, so hopefully we can talk early in the day Thursday. Carol v G CM) jiOJJ— Oscar `^A' 4 discuss a couple details about the building eport prepared, I've got several items that I ou can review them before we talk. AA IL S Cam-- , 20 I n zA".,-• d A ttiO liwjk 11/ 0+- ` u r3- ON/ a 1\10 Page 1 Ecarcii Lumb - RE: WF: TOC - Draft Sholine Staff Report Page 1 From: "Jessica Bradley" < jessica @craftarchitects.com> To: "'Carol Lumb "' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/04/2007 8:12 am Subject: RE: WF: TOC - Draft Shoreline Staff Report CC: <corky- b @comcast. net> Carol: Received your voicemail, more answers .. . The only dumpster /trash removal bins will be inside the fenced area. (You would not believe the trash procedures they follow. <smile >) The reason columnar trees were chosen is a security requirement. The bank prefers the columnar because it is harder for a person to hide behind them. If you would like to discuss further with our landscape architect, feel free to call him: Corky Brown @ (425) 417 -4609. I will copy him on this email. Best regards, Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:21 PM To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Subject: Draft Shoreline Staff Report Hi Jessica: I am attaching a draft of my staff report for the shoreline substantial development permit for your review. Let me know by COB next Monday if there are any factual errors in it. I have a couple questions for you - 1. the SEPA checklist says that one tree will be removed in the new parking lot area, but Sheet L -2 indicates there are 3 cottonwood trees that will be removed. Can you clarify how many trees will be removed? 2. I had mentioned the possibility of needing the parcel with the existing paper processing building and the parcel with the new building to be consolidated. The new building requires 43 new parking stalls, but the site only has room for 24 stalls, with the remainder provided on the adjacent parcel with the existing building. If Wells Fargo does not want to consolidate the two parcels, then they can record a covenant for shared parking that will show up on the title in the event Wells Fargo decides to sell one or both of the parcels. TMC 18.56.070 B. discusses this option. I will need to reflect what option Wells Fargo wants to go with in my design review staff report that I am working on right now. I have to have a draft of that report ready for my supervisor to review by next Monday/Tuesday. Thanks. Carol ,NA I _Carol Lumb - RE: Draft Shoreline S port From: "Jessica Bradley" <jessica @craftarchitects.com> To: "'Carol Lumb "' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/04/2007 8:02 am Subject: RE: Draft Shoreline Staff Report Carol: I've got an answer to one of your questions: 1. Three trees will be removed. I'm still waiting for a reply from Wells Fargo regarding their preference consolidate property lines OR record a covenant. Will forward ASAP. Best regards, Jessica Bradley Original Message--- - From: Carol Lumb [mailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:21 PM To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Subject: Draft Shoreline Staff Report Hi Jessica: I am attaching a draft of my staff report for the shoreline substantial development permit for your review. Let me know by COB next Monday if there are any factual errors in it. I have a couple questions for you - 1. the SEPA checklist says that one tree will be removed in the new parking lot area, but Sheet L -2 indicates there are 3 cottonwood trees that will be removed. Can you clarify how many trees will be removed? 2. I had mentioned the possibility of needing the parcel with the existing paper processing building and the parcel with the new building to be consolidated. The new building requires 43 new parking stalls, but the site only has room for 24 stalls, with the remainder provided on the adjacent parcel with the existing building. If Wells Fargo does not want to consolidate the two parcels, then they can record a covenant for shared parking that will show up on the title in the event Wells Fargo decides to sell one or both of the parcels. TMC 18.56.070 B. discusses this option. I will need to reflect what option Wells Fargo wants to go with in my design review staff report that I am working on right now. I have to have a draft of that report ready for my supervisor to review by next Monday/Tuesday. Thanks. Carol I Carol Lumb - Plan sets From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Jessica: Carol • Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 11/20/2007 4:56 pm Plan sets Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you on the number of additional plan sets I will need. I think if you provide 15 additional plan sets that should be sufficient for the shoreline permit mailing and the design review mailing. If there is some way you could fold them, that would be great. Have a great Thanksgiving. I am out of the office 11/21 through Monday 11/26, back on Tuesday 11/27 if you need me for anything. You should be getting the SEPA determination packet in the mail tomorrow; I posted the site and called the Muckleshoot Tribe to discuss their issues yesterday as well. The staff person who commented for the Tribe is out of the office until December 3, the date comments /appeals are due, but I spoke to another staff person to make them aware of the information that is coming their way. Page 1 November 9, 2007 Carol Lumb Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Wells Fargo, CV Operations - Land Use Applications PERMIT NUMBER #: E07 -009, L07 -035 and L07 -037 Dear Ms. Lumb: This letter is in response to comments received from your office in letters dated July 30, 2007 and July 31, 2007 and an email from Muckleshoot Indian Tribe dated July 24, 2007. E07 -008: Environmental Review: 1. New parking area on Parcel B to provide additional parking for the training building on the north? The new parking area on Parcel B is to provide additional parking for the adjacent existing building on parcel A. (Wells calls this the Sperry building) Not parking for parcels D or E. L07 -037: Design Review: Building Design RecEN NOV 13 2007 EVE opmENT 1. Identify the number or parking stalls required for the new building and existing building. Are any stalls lost? See new cover sheet for revised parking calculations. 2. Revise exterior fagade facing S 180 See revised sheet A4.1 — incorporating a more retail appearance while maintaining the security requirements. 3. Will the doors to the outside have awnings that match those of the existing building? No. Existing awnings are fabric. New awning will be painted steel. 4. Is there any ventilation or other equipment located on the ground other than the generator? Yes, there is a typical electrical transformer adjacent to the generator (keynote 17). 1932 First Ave., Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206 - 720 -7001 Fax: 206 - 720 -2949 Ms. Carol Lumb 11 /9/07 Page 2 of 5 Landscaping 5. Provide a column in the Plant Schedule Key that identifies the number of plants that will be planted for each species. A plant quantity column will be added to the plans for final permit. 6. The Plant Schedule Key uses two different symbols for the same tree — is there something that distinguishes one from the other? Plant Schedule has been revised. 7. The plans are missing an irrigation sheet. Irrigation Plans are included. 8. The landscape Code requires shrubs to be a minimum of 18" in height at planting — it appears from the plant schedule that the shrubs will be 21" in spread — does this correlate with our code requirement? Shurbs have been noted as minimum 18" height as appropriate for plant type. 9. The Swedish Columnar Aspen do not match other tress planted along S 180" Street. Please substitute Red Maples, Tulip Tree, English Oak or Accolade Elm. Columnar Red Maples have been substituted for Swedish Aspen. 10. Will the proposed spacing of groundcover at 30" on center provide 90% coverage within 3 years? Groundcover spacing has been reduced to 24" and 12" o.c. 11. It is not clear from the plan whether groundcover is provided throughout the site. Either provide a note in the planting key or a separate landscape plan that just identifies groundcover location and the type. Groundcover areas have been identified on plans with a hatch. 12. Please confirm that shrubs are being planted along the shoreline. Please substitute Dwarf Redtwig Dogwood as it is not a native species. Landscape planning has been revised. 13. Native plantings are required in the 200 foot shoreline area. Please indicate the shoreline environments on the landscape plan. Planting within 200 feet of shoreline has been revised to native species. With the exception of the street and parking lot trees. 14. The stand alone parking are on parcel B mush include the full range of Type 2 landscaping. Please provide a pedestrian connection between this parking area and the front door of the training building. Type 2 landscape and pedestrian connection has been added. 110907 City of Tukwila Correction LTR.doc Project #746.02 V ,,' r ,, ! r " ' w viti."°a t..- t1.. - �t , . Vsir - i 1,41.4 ,,,,_ ‘.4,4/. 0 1 69 oru,Gev.3 . ,f 2o1 ...._.-144G— /��^ �( . 4-44' dry , , f 01.- e" ®�L Wr"' �,.., ti mot... a, : _ 1 doi /,6 15. Please provide a pedestrian connection from, the stand alone parking area on parcel B to }the shoreline trail that abuts on the east. vn-c ��, b See revised sheet A1.0, keynote 31. ,,,,a,,./-- t.. , ..% 4o 52), (.1„ \ 16)Why are shrubs being removed from the existing landscaping al 'rig the river? . Upon further consideration, shrubs along the river are not t/eing removed. They will remain as is. Ms. Carol Lumb 11/9/07 Page 3 of 5 1 identify on the landscaping plan the location of the new fgncing and how it will connect with the existing fencing. See revised sheet A1.0, keynotes 1 & 2. Both fences are chainlink with privacy slats. The privacy slats will reduce the contrast between old and new. The connection will be traditional chainlink to chainlink connection . i o � 4,44, 18. Wood slats must be used with the chain link fencing unless the landscaping will form a fairly solid screen? Wood privacy slats have been added to the new fence. See revised sheet A1.0, keynotes 1 & 2. 19. It is awkward to jog the proposed new fencing out to join the existing fencing along the trail. Since work is proposed in the existing landscaping area this is an opportunity to move the existing fence to the correct location — inside the landscape area rather than outside. Upon further consideration, the existing landscape area will remain as is. 20. For security purposes, would it be better to plant the Barberis shrubs along the fence on the northwest side of the site? Planting has been revised. 21. There is a wedge shaped area south of the new shoreline planting area adjacent to the asphalt trail that is labeled `River Protection Easement that is not proposed for landscaping. It appears this area is part of the Wells Fargo property and should be included in the shoreline planting area. Planting has been added. 22. The parking bulbs are required to be planted with one tree and a combination of groundcover, shrubs and mulch. Some parking bulbs show only a tree and groundcover. Shrubs have been added to parking lot islands. 23. For the dry river bed area, can you provide a photo of how this area will look or suggest other sites where this technique has been used that we could view? To date, we have not been able to find a photo. We will continue to look and will forward one as soon as it is available. 110907 City of Tukwila Correction LTR.doc Project #746.02 s�a.coc�, Ms. Carol Lumb 11/9/07 Page 4 of 5 Public Works 24. The frontal improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalk on S 180 Street must be continued along the east side of the site. The frontage improvement is added to the plan along the east side of the project. 25. The Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the section of riverbank upstream of S 180 along the Tukwila 205 levee and identified a section that is damaged and in immediate need of repair. To correct these deficiencies, additional easement will be required from the property owner to allow levee side slopes to be a maximum of 2.5 to 1. The Easement width we are requesting is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. A 125 -foot levee easement is shown on the plans and all the storm drainage detention facilities have been moved outside of the easement. 26. The proposed storm water vault should be moved as far from the river as practical so that it will not be affected by any future levee setback work. The proposed storm water vault is relocated outside of the levee easement. Additional / Site Lighting 1. Missing plan sheet that identifies the location of the different light fixtures, lighting for the new parking area serving the new building and lighting for the new parking area on Parcel B. Please provide this information. Please see attached sheets A1.0, E0.1 and E1.0. 2. When you apply for the building permit, the materials must include plans that show street lights on S. 180 Street. Noted. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division 1. Where does the storm system that will receive stormwater from this project drain to? The storm drainage runoff from the project will drain north along Andover Park East to City of Tukwila's P -17 pond prior to discharging into the Green River. Please refer to downstream off -site analysis within the storm drainage report for more detail. 2. How large is the deciduous tree that will be removed? What species of tree is it? How close to the Green River is this tree? It is approximately 36' tall. The species is most probably the Swamp Cottonwood Populus heterophylla (in the section Leucoides). It is approximately 375' from the river. 110907 City of Tukwila Correction LTR.doc Project #746.02 Ms. Carol Lumb 11/9/07 Page 5 of 5 3. Will the project include any low impact development techniques? Project proposes to incorporate the use of landscape areas for additional water quality as bio- filtration swale, also to disperse the runoff to minimize the impact to the downstream system. 4. What is the purpose of the "meandering dry creek bed "? Is this feature needed? Would it be possible to replace this feature with planting trees along the areas of the Green River that are within 200 feet of the project areas to crate shade and a source of organic materials for the Green River? It is a decorative feature. The dry creek bed feature does not begin until 200' from the Green River. The owner requires a vehicle deterrent at the perimeter of the building. Instead of bollards, we will be using large rocks. The dry creek bed is the completion of the idea — to give meaning and justification to the large rocks. 5. Please note that applicant's project consistency narrative is in error. There is ESA listed Chinook that utilize this portion of the Green River. In addition, there are steelhead trout and coho, both of which are proposed for listing that also utilize this portion of the Green River. Noted. Attached also find: (2) copies of Technical Information Report (1) copy of revised rendered elevations and materials board Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Respectfully, Jessica Bradley Project Manager 110907 City of Tukwila Correction LTR.doc Project #746.02 t I 231 al \A)11-6.0 (lc (A— 'Ow) e,c21 K rAA- 0 .4 Arci14 C-•1 NM.) e avt — s-ri VIAlr 40 4netcAx_licy 10 &Lao %Al LL k 4' .074 “A-4 tAAM) e4-4" 5; d4.44ich.uk, fAL ruu.) LL- e "t-A-Al (Ai') LZJ 1100, p Ecc j.- Lara-t14. - kAA-AN ( "it \ ( P1ALt- 0-to•A \ +4 t - d - o wet, - f),3 sruao rovtett;-- - „ 1 -4Apt, rAgm,,, kt10-24 4442 L AcA-44F* "Zoosa___ ,rteAA 92,04Ag& 1A-€12A-L- opkA,r4"(j - s r- sticy-e-, — v$ 00.4)-0^ 0-1- stir- r-N.714 (-v^ - e1/2 s,3t>---- 6-, s t e as,pd.._ 6* J-A- \ _W.A. r j (4 C1'rLW 4d 11 - 1 6 , l 0104-4/h 4011 tern 0 vuor- kasels■ck. ankli btioa4.1 L'r Lt 61. t•-■•J 1 -1No - • 01011in 4-cr I. ' 1/ k [91 Lk - UrIOCX- EW 0444 5C COLAS%-4\ tAWC1i at0A-.=• IVAJ6S - 414 64 LOA/ 0 {111\n-Y gAr644-- Carol Lumb - RE: Wells Fargo project , us From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Jessica: Great news that work on the Wells Fargo project is proceeding. November 1 or 5 works for me, so just let me know which date you want to meet and I'll find a conference room for us. If you will have questions that involve the levee, please let me know so I can make sure Ryan Larson is available to attend the meeting as well. I don't know what his schedule is like for 11 /1 or 11/5. As far as getting us the drawings by November 27th, I am assuming you are referring to the drawings that would go in the Planning Commission packet - and 11/27 is fine. I am also assuming that we will have seen a revised submittal from you well before 11/27, so that staff reports can be written, SEPA can be issued and the shoreline substantial development permit issued prior to the Planning Commission hearing. A submittal from you would include a response to the questions /comments /concerns outlined in my letter and copies of the plan set that reflect any changes to the site plan, building design etc. You would need to provide 4 sets of the plans with the resubmittal so I can circulate them to the other reviewing departments (Public Works and Fire). Now, about the timing of the hearing. There are several land use decisions that need to be made prior to the public hearing. We need to issue our SEPA determination at least 14 days prior to the public hearing (there is a 14 day appeal period, so we want to make sure no one is going to appeal the SEPA decision before we have the public hearing). So, backing up from the December 13 public hearing, we will need to issue SEPA at the latest by November 28th. The shoreline substantial development permit can't be issued until we know there is no appeal of SEPA, so we would need to be ready to issue that permit the day before the public hearing, or December 12, so this moves the issuance of SEPA to 11/27 so we know on 12/13 whether an appeal has been filed. I don't know if this has thoroughly confused you, but the timing will be tight for a 12/13 public hearing if we aren't meeting to discuss issues until the beginning of November. Would you be able to meet earlier? I am out of the office most of next week - I will be in Tuesday and 1 /2 of Wednesday. Let's try to talk Tuesday morning about the scheduling of the meeting to go over issues. Thanks. Carol Carol Lumb jessica @craftarchitects.com 10/12/2007 5:28 pm RE: Wells Fargo Project Status »> "Jessica Bradley" <jessicaOcraftarchitects.com> 10/12/2007 4:12 pm »> Carol: I'm happy to announce we are making progress! Wells Fargo has approved the budget for the project and the team is back doing work. We are targeting the December 13th hearing date. (Which means we will send drawings to you on November 27th - please confirm that this gives you enough time.) We would also like to schedule a meeting with you to discuss our solutions, perhaps Thursday Nov 1st? Or Monday the 5th? We would like to bring our Wells Fargo project manager, landscape architect and civil engineer to this meeting. We may also bring our security consultant. Please reply with your thoughts, Best regards, Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb fmailto :clumb@ci.tukwila.wa.usl P a g e 1 Carol Lumb - RE: Wells Fargo Project Su s Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:20 PM To: iessica(craftarchitects.com Subject: RE: Project Status Hi Jessica: Thanks for the update. If it will be 4 -6 weeks before you have any solutions, it may be that the October hearing date will be missed. Our hearing dates in November and December are earlier due to the holidays - November 8 and December 13. If you think the project will be headed for a new hearing date, let me know as soon as possible so I can reserve a spot for the project. Hope the rest of your week (brief as it is) goes well. It has been a bit nuts over here.- so I am looking forward to the weekend. Carol »> "Jessica Bradley" <iessicaOcraftarchitects.com> 09/06/2007 5:01 pm »> Carol: Wow - you are so proactive. Unfortunately, things are moving at a snails pace. Corporate red tape has taken over and the project is on hold. We are scheduled to meet with the civil and landscaping teams on the 12th to brainstorm solutions. I expect it will be another 4 to 6 weeks before we have any real solutions to share with you. If things change, I will let you know. Best regards, Jessica Original Message From: Carol Lumb jmailto :clumbCalci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:50 PM To: iessica(@craftarchitects.com Subject: Project Status Hi Jessica: I'm checking in on how things are going with the Wells Fargo project on S. 180th Street. I have the SEPA staff report pretty much complete and I was hoping to see what revisions might be proposed in the site lay out and any other project revisions that might need to be reflected in the SEPA staff report before giving it to my supervisor. I am just starting to work on the shoreline staff report, but I will need to know responses to some of design review and the Public Works comment regarding the need for additional levee easement area to reflect these in the staff Page 2: Carol Lumb - RE: Wells Fargo Project report as well. I would appreciate it if you could let me know when you think you will be submitting revised plans for the project so I can schedule review time with other staff. Thanks very much. Carol Page 3 July 31, 2007 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations Land Use Applications Dear Jessica: • Cizy of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director This letter is a follow -up to my letter dated July 30, 2007 which provides technical comments on the Wells Fargo project. As I said in my e-mail to you yesterday, when I reviewed the July 30 letter, I noticed I had left out two items, which are as follows: 1. I don't find a plan sheet that identifies the location of the different light fixtures, lighting for the new parking area serving the new building and lighting for the new parking area on Parcel B. Please provide this information. 2. When you apply for the building permit, the materials must include plans that show street lights on S. 180 Street. I apologize for the omission of these items in the original letter. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Joanna Spencer, Public Works Development Engineer Steven M. Mullet, Mayor CL Page 1 of 1 07/31/2007 9:52:00 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Carol Lumb - Two additional items , ~ 4, From: Carol Lumb To: jessica @craftarchitects.com Date: 07/30/2007 5:01 pm Subject: Two additional items CC: Joanna Spencer Hi Jessica: I noticed I left off two items from the technical comments letter: 1. Under the Building Design Section, I don't find a sheet that identifies the location of the different light fixtures, lighting for the parking lot on Parcel B, and lighting for the northwestern parking area. The Architectural Site Plan identifies what I believe are existing luminaire fixtures on Parcel D. 2. Under the section for items needed for the building permit submittal, street lighting is required along S. 180th Street. I apologize for the omission - I will follow up this e-mail with a letter including these two items. Carol Carol Lumb - Wells Fargo Building _ :� • From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Jessica: I am attaching below the technical comments letter and some photos that will be included in the mailed packet. Some of the materials that will be attached to the letter to not lend themselves to faxing (landscaping plan mark -up). Let me know if you would rather have a courier pick up the packet - the hard copy of the letter and attachments will go out at 10:30 a.m. tomorrow. Let me know if you want to set up a meeting - I am in the office through Thursday this week and in Tuesday through Friday next week. Carol Carol Lumb jessica@craftarchitects.com 07/30/2007 3:05 pm Wells Fargo Building July 30, 2007 Dear Jessica: Cizy of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations Land Use Applications Staff has reviewed the proposed new building and new stand alone parking lot on the Wells Fargo site and has the comments that follow below. In addition, comments /questions were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe during the public comment period. I forwarded those comments via e-mail to you on July 26, 2007, but will include a copy with this letter. Please provide a response to the Muckleshoot comments as well as to the City's. E07 - 008: Environmental Review 1. For the new parking area located on Parcel B, is this parking to provide additional parking for the training building on the north? L07 - 037: Design Review Building Design: 1. The site plan does not identify the number of parking stalls required for the new building or the number of stalls that are required for the existing building and whether any parking stalls are being lost due to the new building. Please provide these calculations on the site plan or other appropriate plan sheet. 2. We understand the need for security for the proposed building — however, it is not acceptable to present a completely solid wall facing S. 180 Street. The building design along S. 180 Street must appear less warehouse -like, with a front facade that mimics a front even though there is no public access. Currently, the design of the north side lacks a consistent design theme, with the CMU randomly placed along the wall. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor CL Page 1 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Walla rr \T•v'ni°o' Commis kir der 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 The Shane Company, located at the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and S. 180 Street had security concerns but provided a facade that faces the street on two sides that adds visual interest and has a retail feel even though no windows are provided. The building located on the southwest corner of Andover Park West and 180 Street also had security concerns but was able to incorporate false windows (and even false building entrances) to the facade to provide a street presence. I have enclosed some photos of both these buildings for your review. 3. Will the doors to the outside have awnings that match those of the existing building? 4. Is there any ventilation or other equipment located on the ground other than the generator? If so, please identify on the site plan. - ►wl,,j a. N sad. - Landscaping: Please see the enclosed landscaping sheet with comments and questions to supplement the comments below. 5. Please provide a column in the Plant Schedule Key that identifies the number of plants that will be planted for each species. 6. The Plant Schedule Key uses two different symbols for the same tree - Ginkgo Biloba `Princeton Sentry' - is there something that distinguishes one from the other? 7. The plans are missing an irrigation sheet. , n 51 wc.Lt. 4A 8. The Landscape Code requires shrubs to be a minimum of 1 inches in height at planting - it appears from the Plant Schedule that the shrubs will be 21 inches in spread - does this correlate with our code requirement? 9. The Swedish Columnar Aspen do not match other trees planted along S. 180 Street. Please substitute Red Maples, Tulip Tree, English Oak, or Accolade Elm, which provide more shade potential as well. `"u "^0' t L .ALA 10. Will the proposed spacing of groundcover at 30 inches on center provide 90% coverage within 3 years? 11. It is not clear from the landscaping plan whether groundcover is provided throughout the site. The Landscaping Code requires groundcover that will cover 90% of the site within 3 years. It needs to be clear to the landscape contractor where groundcover is being planted and what type so that enough ground cover is ordered. Either provide a note in the planting key or a separate landscape plan that just identifies groundcover location and the type. 12. Please confirm that shrubs are being planted along the shoreline - the symbol in that area does not match the Plant Key for Dwarf Redtwig Dogwood (which needs to be substituted as it is not a native species). If a continuous evergreen hedge is used, then groundcover would not be required. 13. Native plantings are required in the 200 foot shoreline area. Please indicate the shoreline environments on the landscape plan assist in identifying which areas will require native plantings. Native strawberry will do well both in the sun and the shade, unlike the Kinnikinnick, which will be shaded out by the mature landscaping eventually. CL Page 2 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 14. The stand alone parking area on parcel B must include the full range of Type 2 landscaping (trees, shrubs, groundcover), not just landscaping for the parking bulbs. Please provide a pedestrian connection between this parking area and the front door of the training building. This is also an area that provides an opportunity for the use of low impact development techniques. 15. Please a pedestrian connection from the stand alone parking area on parcel B to the shoreline trail that abuts on the east. ito 16. Why are shrubs being removed from the existing landscaping along the river? This is mature plant material that appears to be in good condition. Shrubs are part of required landscaping — if we approve their removal, new shrubs must be planted along with groundcover. 17. Please identify on the landscaping plan the location of the new fencing and how it will connect with the existing fencing. It is not clear if the fencing starts at the western edge of the new building or runs in front of it — please clarify. 18. Wood slats must be used with the chain link fencing unless the landscaping will form a fairly solid screen. 19. It is awkward to jog the proposed new fencing out to join the existing fencing along the trail. Since work is proposed in the existing landscaping area '(removal of shrubs) this is an opportunity to move the existing fence to the correct location — inside the landscape area rather than outside. 20. For security purposes, would it be better to plant the Barberis shrubs along the fence on the northwest side of the site? 21. There is a wedge- shaped area south of the new shoreline planting area adjacent to the asphalt trail that is labeled "River Protection Easement" (identified on enclosed Landscape Plan) that is not proposed for landscaping. It appears this area is part of the Wells Fargo property and should be included in the shoreline planting area? 22. The parking bulbs are required to be planted with one tree and a combination of groundcover and shrubs and mulch. Some parking bulbs show only a tree and groundcover. 23. For the dry river bed area, can you provide a photo (electronic) of how this area will look (for inclusion in the staff report) or suggest other sites where this technique has been used close by that we could view? Public Works Comments: 24. The frontal improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalk on S. 180 Street must be continued along the east side of the site. 25. The Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the section of riverbank upstream of S. 180 along the Tukwila 205 levee and identified a section that is damaged and in immediate need of repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. Existing easements do not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies, additional easement will be required from the property owner to allow levee side slopes to be a maximum of 2.5 to 1. CL Page 3 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 The City's Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila. Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require the property owner to grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If additional easements cannot be secured, it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County standards. The Easement width we are requesting is 125 feet as measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. 26. The proposed storm water vault should be moved as far from the river as practical so that it will not be affected by any future levee setback work. You may also want to consider moving the new building eastward, to accommodate the additional easement area. The following comments are for your information when applying for the building permit for the project: 1. A separate Public Works permit will be required for the site pre -load. 2. A Traffic Concurrency Test Application (copy enclosed) is required. This Application is separate from the Traffic Mitigation fees to be paid prior to issuance of the building permit; 3. The current submittal does not address cross - connection issues. When submitting the building permit materials, please show the RPPA for domestic water and DDCUA in a vault for fire prevention on the plans. 4. The new building will be required to be sprinklered. 5. Maintain the existing hydrants and keep a 4 foot clear space around the existing hydrants. 6. Additional hydrants may be needed, per TMC 14.24.040. The parcel on which the stand alone parking is proposed must be consolidated with the parcel with the training facility. I am enclosing the application for the lot consolidation. Processing of this application will not affect the timing of the design review or shoreline permit applications. The design review application is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing at the August 23, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. To retain this hearing date, I will need to receive a response to the above items, the comments submitted by the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and 4 sets of revised plans by Tuesday, August 7, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. I realize this is a very short turn around time, but public hearing notices must be mailed August 8, 2007 - 14 days prior to the hearing date. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to meet to discuss any of the above items. My schedule is open through Thursday. Ryan Larson, the Public Works CL Page 4 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects July 30, 2007 engineer who provided comments on the levee is on vacation until Monday, August 6, 2007, in the event you want to schedule a meeting with him. I can be reached at 206- 431 -3661. Sincerely, ulAk oi(4-cii, Carol Lumb Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Joanna Spencer, Pubic Works Development Engineer Ryan Larson, Public Works Senior Engineer, Surface Water CL Page 5 of 5 07/30/2007 2:41:00 PM Q: \Wells Fargo \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Carol Lumb - Wells Fargo, CV1erations - Design Review Narrative* rr W . .rw.rw.wywwrir. From: "Jessica Bradley" <jessica @craftarchitects.com> To: <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 07/03/2007 4:02 PM Subject: Wells Fargo, CV Operations - Design Review Narrative CC: "'Kathy Craft' <kathy @craftarchitects.com> Carol: Per your request, attached find a Design Review Narrative for the Wells Fargo, CV Operations project. Let us know if you need any additional information. Best regards, Jessica Bradley Project Manager Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Ave., Suite 408 Seattle, WA. 98101 p.206.720.7001 f.206.720.2949 www.craftarchitects.com Page 1 of 1 file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \CAROL -L \Local Settings\ Temp \XPGrpWise \468A7302tuk -ma... 07/03/2007 WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS City of Tukwila Design Review Narrative July 3, 2007 1. a. The proposed building is located on the corner of S 180 and Sperry Drive. It is not a retail building nor is there a customer service component so pedestrian access is not desired. The existing sidewalk on 180 will be maintained and a minimum depth of 15' of landscaping will be added between 180 and the building. The activity taking place within the building (sorting /processing of paper products) requires a high level of security. To meet the owner's security needs, the landscaping proposed at the corner is a meandering creek bed with large rocks instead of bollards. (See below for additional description of proposed landscaping.) b. Service areas and majority of parking is not visible from S 180 or Sperry. Service areas are enclosed with a CMU wall and there are large landscape islands between the end of the parking and the street. c. The height of the building is 22'. The heights of the enclosed truck bay are 15' and 10'. The height of the adjacent building is 17' -6 ". 2. a. The building materials are painted concrete panels, CMU veneer and CMU block. Paint, split face CMU and ground face CMU are strategically applied to create visual interest and break -up the large rectangular mass both vertically and horizontally. b. This building is part of an existing campus of Wells Fargo buildings. The levy and Green River abut the west property line of the proposed new sorting facility. This project does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and will not affect or alter the actual shoreline of the Green River or its existing pedestrian path located on the top of the levy. There is currently a path leading from the sidewalk along S 180 Street to the pedestrian pathway along the top of the levy cutting across the northwest corner of the site. We propose to maintain this path in keeping with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan Section 4.3.2 "Existing Public Access Sites ". 42% of the site will also be landscaped including informal open space in the northwest corner of the site. There will be no disruption to existing trees within the river environment except for minor trimming as necessary for public safety. Some of the existing low growing shrubs within the river protection easement on this site and the adjacent property will be replaced with low growing ground 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 PH: 206.720.7001 Fax: 206.720.2949 Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 2 of 5 061907Design Review Narrative.doc • • cover for bank control and public safety. The existing vegetation onsite consists only of grasses. The new landscaping will include some lawn, drought tolerant plantings, new trees and shrubs that will enhance and complement the landscaping on the adjacent property to the south. c. The site is located in a fully developed area, surrounded by retail to the north, office to the east and a data processing facility also owned and operated by Wells Fargo to the south. The levy and Green River abut the Phase One parking lot on the east. The existing neighborhood character is large box, warehouse type retail, office and industrial type buildings. Although our building type and use are industrial in nature, we have added color, texture and modulation to the north elevation which faces retail sites and S 180 d. The vehicular circulation pattern will not change. Access to the new building will be through an existing Wells Fargo parking lot. The pedestrian circulation pattern will not change. e. The vehicular circulation pattern and driveway entries will not change. 3. The existing site is flat and featureless. The existing vegetation onsite consists only of grasses. Due to the high security nature of this site, large trees and large shrubs are discouraged. The new landscaping will include some lawn, drought tolerant plantings, new trees and shrubs. Service areas are screened with walls and fences. Landscaping up against fencing is also provided. Due to security concerns, exterior lighting is important to Wells Fargo — both building mounted and site pole fixtures are provided. Wells Fargo standard fixtures are proposed. These fixtures are a commercial grade, industrial type fixture, consistent with the adjacent community. The light fixture color is dark bronze. Quantity and quality is a compromise between security standards and light trespass sections of the code. Our goal is to strike a balance between the security requirements that limit our lighting and landscaping opportunities and create an enjoyable place for people to work. 4. a. Due to security concerns we are not trying to make a 'statement' with our building — blending into our surroundings is our goal. b. Building scale is consistent with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components are proportionate and consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors are harmonious; beige, yellow, green and red. None of the colors are highly saturated. The darkest color (red) is used for the metal roof and parapet coping. The brightest accent color (yellow) is used to identify the entry. All roof top equipment has been Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 3 of 5 • • screened from view. Exterior lighting is part of the architectural concept and harmonious with building design. Visual interest has been provided on the building using paint, CMU veneer and CMU block. 5. There are no miscellaneous structures associated with the building. Street furniture is discouraged due to security concerns – loitering near the building is not encouraged. A bike rack has been provided at the building entry. 6. This proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Tukwila in the following ways: Visually attractive – A variety of textures, materials, colors and heights have been used to create visual interest, contrast, and rhythm and turn a large rectangular mass into an attractive structure. Our design goal is to be simple and unassuming. The landscaping is professionally designed, climatically appropriate and drought tolerant. Value to the community – We believe constructing this building on a currently undeveloped site; replacing un- manicured grasses with a building and professional landscaping adds value to the community and provides new employment opportunities. Designed with pride – At Craft Architects, we are dedicated to our clients' needs and strive to exceed expectations. This building, like any other work we do, is important to us and deserves our best ideas and effort. This site is Wells Fargo's Tukwila campus and this building is a direct reflection of their brand. Constructed with quality workmanship – Since 1972, Poe Construction has maintained a high level of quality and integrity, which has garnered them a solid reputation throughout the industry. They construct only commercial buildings for the private sector in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. They stake their future, their reputation, and the culture of their company on their ability to build and maintain high integrity relationships —with personnel, clients, specialty contractors, suppliers, professional service providers, design partners, building officials, and their community. Poe's people demonstrate their priorities of honesty, integrity, respect, and trust. Their mission is to demonstrate this whether on a building project or contributing time, talent, or treasure to the community. Poe's union - certified field supervisors, carpenters, and laborers provide the highest level of quality on every project. Wholesome and in harmony with adjacent uses - The site is located in a fully developed area, surrounded by retail to the north, office to the east and a data processing facility also owned and operated by Wells Fargo to the south. The 061907Design Review Narrative.doc Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 4 of 5 • • levy and Green River abut West property line. The existing neighborhood character is large box, warehouse type retail, office and industrial type buildings. Due to security concerns we are not trying to make a 'statement' with our building — blending into our surroundings is our goal. Building scale is consistent with permanent neighboring developments. Traffic and congestion patterns — This site will be accessed via Sperry Drive. Sperry Drive connects to S 180 Street with a signaled intersection. Upon completion, on average, approximately 22 people will work in the new building. At maximum capacity (in the future) 30 -35 people could work in the new building. Delivery traffic is estimated at (15) trucks per day, (8) of these occurring between 4:00 and 6:00pm. No customer or visitor traffic will occur. We believe that because the intersection is signaled, employees, neighbors and /or Tukwila residents will not notice the changes in traffic and congestion patterns. Characteristics of Tukwila's history — We could say that Wells Fargo is a symbol of the pioneering spirit for which the City of Tukwila was settled upon. Honestly, this project was not intended to reflect any specific characteristic of Tukwila's history. It is to Wells Fargo's advantage to locate their CV Operations near the Federal Reserve, which we understand is now located in Tukwila. Fencing and landscape buffers provided between commercial and residential uses — not applicable, no residential uses nearby. Adequate parking and lighting — Upon completion, on average, approximately 22 people will work in the new building. At maximum capacity (in the future) 30- 35 people could work in the new building. To accommodate these new employees (110) parking stalls adjacent to the building and (56) new overflow parking stalls across Sperry Drive have been added. Total # of parking stalls on the campus is (224). The lighting on this parcel and the adjacent parcel will be replaced to meet Wells Fargo security guidelines and City of Tukwila guidelines. The following light levels are proposed: • A minimum of 2 footcandles across the site • An average value slightly greater than 5 footcandles around the perimeter of the building • A minimum of 10 footcandles at the entrance • The area surrounding the entrance was also kept at an average just above 10 footcandles. Open spaces and trails - The levy and Green River abut the west property line of the proposed new sorting facility. This project does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and will not affect or alter the actual shoreline of the Green River or its existing pedestrian path located on the top of the levy. There is currently a path leading from the sidewalk along S 180 Street to the pedestrian pathway along the top of the levy cutting across the 061907Design Review Narrative.doc Wells Fargo Design Review Narrative Page 5 of 5 061907Design Review Narrative.doc S • northwest corner of the site. We propose to maintain this path in keeping with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan Section 4.3.2 "Existing Public Access Sites ". No new trails are proposed. Connection to City's trail network — The project proposes maintaining and enhancing existing path connections to trail network. June 18, 2007 Ms. Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 • Guy of Tukwila • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Wells Fargo CV Operations, File Nos. E07 -009 (SEPA), L07 -035 (Shoreline) and L07 -037 (Design Review) Dear Ms. Bradley: Your shoreline substantial development permit and SEPA applications for a new building for Wells Fargo Bank, located at 6855 S. 180 Street, Tukwila have been found to be complete on June 14, 2007 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project has been assigned to me, and tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on Thursday, August 23, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. The Design Review application (L07 -037) was missing the response to the design review criteria. I have faxed these to your office. I don't need the response to these criteria to get the review process going, but these must be submitted as soon as possible to complete the design review application materials and retain the tentative August 23, 2007 public hearing date before the Board of Architectural Review. If the materials are not received within 90 days, the Department may cancel the application due to inactivity. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, j-1/44-1 0 41114 qr — Carol Lumb Senior Planner cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Manager Reviewing Departments CL Page 1 of 1 06/16/2007 2:34:00 PM 6300 Sot `'ifahfe to1Yevaa Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Carol Lumb - Public Notice Boards From: To: Date: Subject: Carol Lumb Internet:157 @fastsigns.com 06/18/2007 3:36 pm Public Notice Boards Hi Julie: I would like to request public notice boards for two different projects as follows: Board #1: Project Name: Associated Grocers Access Improvements File Number: L07 -034 Permit Action: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Site is on the NE corner of East Marginal Way S. and Boeing Access Rd. Please post the notice board on East Marginal Way, just before the entrance to the site, which is just north of the intersection of these 2 roads. There is a power pole at the entrance, then a small strip of grass in front of a chain link fence with brown slats - put the sign to the south of the power pole, in the grassing stip between the sidewalk and the slatted fence. Board #2: Project Name: Wells Fargo Building File Number: E07 -009, L07 -035 and L07 -037 Permit Action: Environmental Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Design Review Please post the notice board on the NW corner of Sperry Dr. and S. 180th Street. There is no site address as yet for this project, but the parcel # is 362304 -9095 if you need to see where it is located. Let me know if you have any questions. My telephone number is 206 -431 -3661 or you can e-mail me at clumbci.tukwila.wa. Please let me know as soon as possible when the signs will be posted so I can coordinate the public notice mailing that goes out concurrent with the sign posting. Thanks very much. Carol Lumb Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax: (206) 431 -3665 FaX To: Fax: rl D O -- .2A g Phone: Re: •Comments: • • lwA4,, (my— 1,moti-it- 1 2,0 - 100 1 From: Date: Pages: City Of Tukwila 4Vo ( LuMb (o -13 -o1 lA it? jj L So — G V O9 1/ o/1 S ❑ Urgent l .(For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle ar►-. ��t� d�cc. cA v(l te L o •Ovcp,0 / Lcs Inh, 640st\06..f , W V. ,t PI e&, e 1owN ta6t- ,pay ` fr o he t P (tom �a e ✓' riA cow, vo f 6w I 1 W lam- J pa" iu.t t c vttGvc keto --tom ip/1)-a-R sefaxotA , frcy' h, lc Jac, - 1 vl- VA G 1 - 3 CSC, DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA The specific design criteria used to evaluate each project differs based on the type of project and its location. Please discuss project consistency with the applicable set of design criteria. The applicant bears responsibility for demonstrating that the proposed development plans satisfy all of the review criteria. The three sets of Board of Architectural Review (BAR) criteria and references to illustrate implementing design guidelines are presented below. Please consult with Planning Division staff to clarify which set of criteria should be used. Selected Comprehensive Plan policies, which provide illustrative design guidance, are presented after the criteria as a courtesy. The complete Comprehensive Plan policies are provided in the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Written responses to all criteria are required for a complete application. CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS (TMC 18.60.050(A)). Applies to all projects requiring design review except: multifamily, hotel and motel developments and developments in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor (see TMC 18.60.060(C)). Projects located within 200' of Green/Duwamish River must meet additional criteria in the Shoreline _ Substantial Development Permit Application. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area a. Harmony in texture, line and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \BABApp- 6-06.doc,12/04/06 2 f. Screening of service }s and other places, which tend to be uhtly should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in • winter and summer. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and paving of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. 4. Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of design and relationship to surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and fitting should be used to provide visual interest. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Consistency with adopted plans and regulations (TMC 18.100.030) 6. Demonstrate the manner in which the proposal is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila's Development Regulations and other official laws, policies and objectives of the City of Tukwila. P:\ Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- 6-06.doc, 12/04/06 3 f. Screening of service A lk s and other places, which tend to be uhtly should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and paving of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. 4. Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of design and relationship to surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and fitting should be used to provide visual interest. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Consistency with adopted plans and regulations (TMC 18.100.030) 6. Demonstrate the manner in which the proposal is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila's Development Regulations and other official laws, policies and objectives of the City of Tukwila. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- 6- 06.doc,12/04/06 3 1 , a • • c. Sign Design 1. Consider both day- and night -time viewing in the design, placement, and lighting of ' signage. 2. Provide durable, high quality materials and finishes for signage. Consistency With Adopted Plans And Regulations (TMC 18.100.030) 5. Demonstrate the manner in which the proposal is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and regulations and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila's Development Regulations and other official laws, policies and objectives of the City of Tukwila. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES RELATED TO DESIGN REVIEW The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan contains policies regarding the design of certain types of development in particular zones or areas. These policies further articulate the design review criteria in TMC 18. Policies related to multifamily, hotel and motel developments, and the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor have been omitted in favor of the specific design guidelines referenced in the appropriate design criteria. Please note that more than one category of policies may apply (e.g. a motel on Interurban Avenue in the RCM zone will need to satisfy policies for: General Commercial Areas and Interurban Avenue South, and the "Multi- family Design Guidelines "). In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide a context for the design policies. A. ALL COMMERCIAL AREAS Goal 1.7: "Commercial districts that are visually attractive and add value to the community, are visitor and pedestrian friendly, are designed with pride and constructed with quality workmanship, are secure and safe with adequate lighting and convenient access, are uncongested with smooth- flowing traffic patterns, are well- maintained with adequate streetscape landscaping, and are wholesome and in harmony with adjacent uses ". 1. The design includes consideration of features that reflect characteristics of Tukwila's history (1.2.4). 2. Fencing and landscape buffers are provided between commercial and residential uses (1.7.4) 3. The development provides adequate parking and lighting (1.7.3). 4. Where open spaces and trails are included in the development, they are designed not to interfere with the reasonable use of adjacent private property (1.10.11), and they are designed and constructed in a manner that is safe for all users and adjacent property owners (1.11.7). 5. In areas of concentrated commercial and retail activity, the development is connected by pedestrian facilities to the City's trail network, where feasible (1.11.4). B. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL CENTER (RCC) ZONE Goal 7.7: "Residential Commercial Centers that bring small commercial concentrations into existing residential neighborhoods to improve existing residential areas while providing products and services to nearby residents" . P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- 6- 06.doc,12/04/06 9 2. Relate the des and scale of building elements and *ils to the building's overall form and massing. 3. Employ architectural details that are appropriate to the architectural character of the building. 4. Utilize durable, high quality building materials that contribute to the overall appearance, ease of maintenance, and longevity of the building. 5. Integrate the design and placement of exterior lighting with the architectural design and materials. d. Pedestrian - Oriented Features 1. Provide pedestrian- friendly facades (see Definitions) on the ground floor of all buildings that face public streets and entry facades that face parking areas. 2. Provide special treatment for large blank walls (see Definitions) that are visible from pedestrian walkways and parking areas. 3. Enhance building entries through the use of weather protection, landscaping, pedestrian amenities and/or distinctive architectural features. e. Mechanical Equipment 1. Locate and/or screen roof - mounted mechanical equipment to minimize visibility from public streets, building approaches, and adjacent properties. 2. Locate and /or screen utility meters and other ground level utility equipment to minimize visibility from the street. 3. Landscape Design a. Landscape Design 1. Develop a landscape design concept that demonstrates a clear and appropriate aesthetic statement. 2. Develop a landscape design concept that reinforces site design and fulfills the functional requirements of the development, including screening and buffering. 3. Ensure that the landscape design reinforces and complements plantings in the public right -of -way. b. Planting Design 1. Select plant materials that reinforce the landscape design concept, and are appropriate to their location in terms of hardiness, maintenance needs, and growth characteristics. 2. Incorporate existing significant trees, wooded areas, and/or vegetation in the planting plan where they contribute to overall landscape design. 4. Signs a. Signage Concept 1. Provide signage that is integrated with the architectural concept in scale, detailing, use of color, materials, and placement. b. Sign Placement 1. Provide signage that is oriented to both pedestrians and motorists in design and placement. 2. Provide adequate directional signage on site and building identification numbers that are legible from the street(s). 3. Integrate freestanding signs with the landscaping. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ BARApp-6-06.doc, 12/04/06 8 r Project: tultIts cLi(i o 31 cI9 1- s ; zed (44 : )1 (.. k) Altik c.vir Le r Address: (,g 3 DSO `' Date transmitted: — t (0—o - 1 Response requested by: SJiy to Z-O Staff coordinator: ( _6. /o \ Date response received: 1).14 - - ` ,. // a 2 . t2 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Numbers Eol -ooi Lai- 035 L0 - 031 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ,J Building Planning Public Wo Fire Dept. Police Dept. IM Parks/Rec rvr TV" REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) J Po B Witt, BE T avo l eD '7Z) .SP,2i,uK667Z-t� MA/ tv7 1,/ i /5yW1. > /,i ivr$ . I DeA -A/7 JfliJ1 /v &ml) 7b $1= 11 8 -t mom DI 67711i C- 0E61 vnL 41 EXITS Tie 7M L' /y. Zy oyo /14 y i A-Z-o 1 0 EX / 6 77x/ G f e r5 )' Plan check date: WI. '/O? Comments prepared by: JS IZ_ Update date: Project: -� —�- WU.s c- 4( 3 d.3 i - SZU L r, C p ewk . Ic r Address: &5 $• IS0`' Date transmitted: LP – I (0-0.1 Response requested by: Sui ' lei WO - 7 Staff coordinator: LOA /01 1 Date response received: TO: Building • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development vrf Plannin ECEIVE Jikil 0 2007 TUKVvi1A PUBLIC WORKS • File Numbers LOi — O35 L.l — °3 1 LAND US F ' RMIT ROUTING FORM Public Work 'Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) I Ste 2ches RA/42A4, & A s e - dace/ 7/03120 07 ,sepo-frae Po) ,,,etda ,3) Q. T ' Ted .coca. 44.ee. d 4e i � �-aR� . /�s�,.���, ev�c. /� fee I � 30/3 a G ov --* , s e-e . r: a ' i J !y ;vim- i Ss[ees ire /yt-of c4c.r✓ os-c fi t? 1� PM 4 � , w, e.sft //C1',9 i ' a- vim- Y re 070 & S �� � P s Plan check date: Comments prepared by: jgovnAkz..-- Update date: ok Joanna Spencer - Proposed Wells FargW/ Operation From: Ryan Larson To: Joanna Spencer Date: 07/03/2007 10:28 am Subject: Proposed Wells Fargo -CV Operation CC: Levesque, Andy Joanna, I have reviewed the levee issue for this project with Jim and have the following comments: The Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the section of riverbank upstream of S. 180th along the Tukwila 205 levee and identified a section that is damaged and in immediate need of repair. The City is working with the King County Flood Control District and the Corps of Engineers to develop a plan to repair these deficiencies and provide adequate bank stability. Existing easements do not allow for adequate side slope angles and levee slumping is the result. To correct these deficiencies, additional easement will be required from the property owner to allow levee side slopes to be a maximum of 2.5 to 1. The Flood Control Ordinance requires abutting property owners to bring deficient levees up to current design standards and grant flood control easements to the King County Flood Control District and the City of Tukwila. Since the City is already working with the Corps of Engineers and King County to upgrade the levee, the City will only require the property owner to grant additional easements to allow the repair to take place. If additional easements can not be secured it will be up to the property owner to repair the levee per Corps of Engineer and King County Standards. The Easement width we are requesting is 125' as measured from the ordinary high water mark along both river frontages. Existing parking can remain but may need to be reconfigured during the actual levee construction by the County. The proposed stormwater vault should be moved as far from the river as practical so that it will not be affected by any future levee setback work. - Ryan Project: 1,04. 0S V-at/i 0 1W3 +- STIorvi &L C peuvv.A. k r-- Address: Date transmitted: (P — 1 (0—O Response requested by: SJly 0, 2_007 Staff coordinator: LOA/01 Date response received: TO: J Building I City of Tukwila Department of Community Development PERMIT ROUTING FORM Public Works FTK Fire Dept. • File Numbers EOn — �� LO"1 — O 3 5 Lot - 03 `l El Police Dept. 1 Parks/Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. am; N � s «� e P el — COMMENTS l (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) b a c k• l p lu ha l P S S 0 11 — a vvvo va c ti) h 0 t € Q lG 14+ a Ye . . 1 vvr o.t-t c l I h u , r I ct f at/kr) c r OKI ►gym - 1 S / � v‘ uh e I CC (6 11 vPrO4 S ( iJ Q-P r) -la r I v use 1. \,-e e �• �o I uv� vrcr r GSpv, CC(U' \a.e re VV1 u e c) L.7 (0 rc. -1 c) . s lo ;�.. / 0 v- V‘Ci S - 1 g 0 k — re of 14 f? c t C S eel Plan check date: Comments prepared by: 5a, Update date: fo 7- 75 -p7 R:o vie 'to re,i7 o d/,- Carol Lumb - Wells Fargo- CV• ration- E07 -009, L07 -035, and L07'7 Notice of Application From: "Karen Walter" < Karen .Walter @muckleshoot.nsn.us> To: "Carol Lumb" <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 07/24/2007 2:52 PM Subject: Wells Fargo- CV operation- E07 -009, L07 -035, and L07 -037 Notice of Application Page 1 of 1 Carol, The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and environmental checklist for the above referenced project. We have some questions. 1. Where does the storm system that will receive stormwater from this project drain to? The checklist is incomplete. 2. How large is the deciduous tree that will be removed? What species of tree is it? How close to the Green River is this tree? 3. Will the project include any low impact development techniques as described in the Low Impact Development guidelines (http: / /www.psat.wa.gov /Publications /LID tech manual05 /lid index.htm; additional information is available at the Puget Sound Action Team's website)? If not, why not? 4. What is the purpose of the "meandering dry creek bed with boulders that will be added along the NE corner of Parcel E? Is this feature needed? Would it be possible to replace this feature with planting trees along the areas of the Green River that are within 200 feet of the project areas to create shade and a source of organic materials for the Green River. 5. Please note that applicant's project consistency narrative is in error. There is ESA listed chinook that utilizes this portion of the Green River. In addition, there are steelhead trout and coho, both of which are proposed for listing that also utilize this portion of the Green River. As you can see, we need additional information before we can provide any technical comments to this project. I look forward to the City's responses. Thank you, Karen Walter Watershed and Land Use Team Leader MITFD 253 - 876 -3116 file•/ /C•\Tlnrnmantc and CPttln[TC \CiX _T \T nasal AL A4111 n^11^1 n /11111^7 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Jessica Bradley, Craft Architects, PLLC has filed applications for development of a 12,983 sq. ft. concrete tilt -up building and 5,682 sq. ft. covered truck loading area with associated parking, and a separate parking lot associated with an existing building to be located at 6855 S. 180th Street, Tukwila, WA. Each building site is bordered by the Green River. Permits applied for include: E07 -009, SEPA environmental review; L07 -035, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and L07 -037, Design Review. Other known required permits include: building permit Studies required with the applications include: Technical Information Report (stormwater) and Geotechnical Report. An environmental checklist has been submitted with the studies identified above. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: E07 -009, L07 -035 and L07 -037 OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Wednesday, July 25, 2007. To receive notification of the final decision on this project, please submit this request to DCD by July 23, 2007 as well. Opportunity for additional oral and written public comments will be provided at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, tentatively scheduled for August 23, 2007 to consider the proposed design of the building (file #L07 -037). To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431 -3670. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The design review application may be appealed to the City Council; the shoreline substantial development permit may be appealed to the State Shoreline Hearing Board. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at (206) 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: May 25, 2007 Notice of Completeness Issued: June 18, 2007 Notice of Application Issued: June 25, 2007 CL Page I of I 06/25/2007 9:23:00 AM Q: \Wells Fargo \NOA.doc VICINITY MAP • REN !VED • PROJECT LOCATION a r c h i t e c t s GIUIYfio'fuN rY DEVELOPMENT WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS Tukwila, Washington Pte' CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800 -424 -5555 WELLS FARGO CV - OPERATION A PORTION OF THE GOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF X138 AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST WM COVER SHEET 0 • State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tu kplaI1 )ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I G-cin . L( J Mb (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on ii - 2-5-01 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and giie other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 5. ti0 S e ' S 1 02 ✓Y 1, ✓, so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number E 07 --00(1 r 407 - 035, L0 1'3 7 I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applicant or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. 6� C SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 20 P: \Planning Forms\ Applications \ SignSpecHandout - June 2006.doc June 19, 2006 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I. S 6, cCk HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: .0 001 l 7 �O3 Lc) Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: Ca,J Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda v pctice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other 1 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 07 day of Jt. F'4 the P: ADMINISTRATIVEFORMSWORMS AFFIDAVITOFDISTR BUTTON Project Name: J (S C Aa n.4-- Project Number: .0 001 l 7 �O3 Lc) i ` Mailer's Signature: . g'i42Ci- Person requesting mailing: Ca,J 1 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 07 day of Jt. F'4 the P: ADMINISTRATIVEFORMSWORMS AFFIDAVITOFDISTR BUTTON ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENC RS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMI TION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDUFE N () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DMSION ( ) KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT UBRARY NTON UBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY () QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA GTY DEPARTMENTS: `P PU ,VIIORKS () FIRE OUCE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ()CITY CLERK ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL 4( sw K9 CWIMBER MUCKLESHOOTAINDI TRIBE ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM 304.FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:MDMTNISTRATIVEWORMS\CHKUST.DOC 5cr Nona of 0011c4y-Qa►- a- e S e, r v1 ahae, -f Sea# ciaollse seAr •G e(ao■s WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( EPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANO DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DMSION• OOFFICE OF A GEN ERAL • SEND CHKUST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES SCHOOLS/UBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES MEDIA 91 . e.C5 c6'■ Pit. . y ( U.S. CNVIRVryMCry l Pit. fl . •-■%acow p ( U.S. DEPT .U.D. () NATIONAIINE FISHERIES SERVICE DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE a fl KC. DEV & E SERVICESSEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER UBRARY () K C PUBUC UBRARY ( ) HIGHUNE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT *20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT *125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBUC WORKS () BR•N MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT N PLANNING DEPT ) CITY OF SEA-TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE• • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. )(DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON OUWAN9SH RIVER Crtikr A aAAle. &radle1 I 6 132 Ft „ , _e et 44 C. I ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CLTUKINILA.WA.US.WWW S its 10 AMC FAMILY LLC PO BOX 2720 PORTLAND, OR 97208 EJT INC PO BOX 25080 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98093 HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND PO BOX 105842 ATLANTA, GA 30348 JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY L L 1001 KAMOKILA BLVD KAPOLEI, HI 96707 CASCADE TUKWILA LLC 7900 SE 28TH ST 3400 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 FIRST INTER BNK- KIRKLAND PO BOX 63931 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94163 HIGH BEECH LLC PO BOX 463 REDMOND, WA 98073 LILY POINTE INVESTMENTS 4128 W AMES LAKE DR NE REDMOND, WA 98053 EDWARDS,J MICHAEL 265 CAREFREE WAY FRIDAY HARBOR, WA 98250 GRAY CAT COLLECTIVE LLC 5430 45TH AVE W SEATTLE, WA 98199 HOUGHTON HARBOR LLC 1233 ANDOVER PARK E TUKWILA, WA 98188 NC POWER SYSTEMS CO 17900 W VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA 98188 SFP B LTD PTNRSHP TENANT TENANT OPO BOX 667 1228 ANDOVER PARK E 1230 ANDOVER PARK E PRINEVILLE, OR 97754 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 18123 72ND AVE S 18235 OLYMPIC AVE S 18251 CASCADE AVE S KENT, WA 98032 TUKWILA, WA 98188 SEATTLE, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 18260 OLYMPIC AVE S 6700 RIVERSIDE DR 6750 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 SEATTLE, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 6801 S 180TH ST 6804 S 180TH ST 6810 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TENANT 6818 S 180TH ST 6820 S 180TH ST 6835 S 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98188 TENANT TENANT TUKWILA TT LLC 6847 S 180TH ST 7100 SW 43RD ST 3300 MAPLE VALLEY HWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 TUKWILA, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98058 Jessica Bradley Craft Architects 1932 1 Ave., Suite 408 WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS City of Tukwila Project Consistency Narrative May 25, 2007 1. The site is currently zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) and is located at the intersection of South 180 Street and Sperry Drive. Wells Fargo plans to develop its two remaining parcels in their existing campus surrounding Sperry Drive. Phase One includes the addition of an overflow parking lot for their existing operations. Phase Two includes plans to construct a new 12,983 s.f. building to be used for storage and sorting /processing of paper products. The facility falls under a light manufacturing use category. This use is permitted outright in the TUC zone. 2. The site is located in a fully developed area, surrounded by retail to the north, office to the east and a data processing facility also owned and operated by Wells Fargo to the south. The levy and Green River abut the Phase One parking lot on the east. The levy and Green River abut the west property line of the proposed new sorting facility. These two projects do not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program and will not affect or alter the actual shoreline of the Green River or its existing pedestrian path located on the top of the levy. There is currently a worn path leading from the sidewalk along South 180 Street to the pedestrian pathway along the top of the levy cutting across the northwest corner of the site. We propose to maintain and enhance this path in keeping with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan Section 4.3.2 "Existing Public Access Sites ". 42% of the site will also be landscaped including informal open space in the northwest corner of the site. 3. The Green River is actually located beyond Wells Fargo's property lines. No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river. 4. There will be no disruption to of existing trees within the river environment except for minor trimming as necessary for public safety. Some of the existing low growing shrubs within the river protection easement will be replaced with low growing ground cover for bank control and public safety. The existing vegetation onsite consists only of grasses. The new landscaping will include some lawn, drought tolerant plantings, new trees and shrubs. . 5. No effluents will be discharged into the Green River. 6. All State and Federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. The scope of work does not directly affect the Green River. A rock construction entrance and silt fencing will be provided during construction to reduce runoff sediment. 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 PH: 206.720.7001 Fax: 206.720.2949 Wells Fargo Project Consistency Narrative Page 2 of 2 • • 7 The scope of work does not directly affect the Green River. No endangered species have been identified in the immediate vicinity and the surrounding area is fully developed. No wildlife habitat should be affected 8. A rock construction entrance and silt fencing will be provided during construction for erosion control. Landscaping and surface water control will be provided for the entire site for erosion control. 9. All necessary permits will be obtained by the Wells Fargo team including SEPA review, Shoreline Permit, Grade and Fill, Building, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection. 10. Dredging is not part of this project and will not be required. 11. Mining is not part of this project and will not be required. 12. Solid waste disposal will be removed from the site. 13. This is private property and will remain private property for private use. 14. Landfilling within the river channel is not part of this project and will not be required. 15. The removal of cottonwood trees within the river environment of the low impact environment is not part of this project and will be required. 052307 Proj Consiste n cyNa rrative. doc CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION REPORT MEETING DATE: MAY 10, 2004 ITEM NUMBER: SUBJECT: USE OF CHAIN LINK FENCE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY DATE: MAY 6, 2004 FROM: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT /ADMINISTRATION PRESENTATION WILLIAM J. MORRIS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES BY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: WILLIAM J. MORRIS AT 714 754 -5343 RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff on the use of chain link fence in conjunction with City projects and on City property. BACKGROUND: Members of the City Council have requested a review of the use of chain link fencing within the public right -of -way and on public property. This issue was discussed by City Council at a recent meeting that included the proposed award of a construction contract for the Joann Street Bike Trail Fencing Improvement project. By way of history, the "Joann Street Bike Trail Fencing Improvement" project was approved as part of the FY 02 -03 Capital Improvement Program budget (map, Attachment 1). This first phase was to replace the existing five -foot high wooden and chain link fencing along the south side of the trail with something that would provide greater privacy and security to the residences that back up to the trail (pictures, Attachment 2). Prior to design of the project, staff met with the affected homeowners on Joann Street, and it was determined to install a chain link fence similar to the one that existed on the north side of the bicycle trail, adjacent to the City's golf course. The project was presented to the City Council at the January 5, 2004, meeting for award of a construction contract. At that time, Council declined to award a construction contract, and requested that staff re- analyze the use of chain link fencing on this and other public projects. Cost comparisons of the different types of fencing were also requested to be analyzed. It should be noted that chain link is used almost exclusively as temporary fencing for purposes such as construction yards, construction sites, etc. This report will address only the use of permanent -type fence improvements within public right -of -way and on public property. h(wv� c-r afi- v � l t' heow I 2)3jy1 ANALYSIS: Staff has researched several different types of common fencing that can be used for various purposes, and may be appropriate for public use (pictures, Attachment 3). Additional information has been provided (Attachment 4) to compare the pricing and durability of each of these fencing systems. This attachment also estimates the longevity and the annual maintenance cost for each type of fencing, once installed. A standard eight -foot high fence was used in this matrix for uniformity and for comparison purposes. As can be seen from this chart, the costs vary significantly between the different types of fencing. Many of the City's projects require significant amounts of fencing to be installed. A's an example, approximately 380 lineal feet of Type "B" wrought iron fencing was used on the Hamilton Street Community Garden. Approximately 2,655 lineal feet would be needed to install new fencing on the south side of the Joann Street bike trail. Currently, the skate park design plans include 650 lineal feet of a wrought iron -type felicing along its perimeter. The Fairview Road slope restoration /sound attenuation project, on the west side of Fairview Road, south of the 405 Freeway, will install approximately 425 lineal feet of green vinyl- coated chain link fencing (1 3 /4" Mesa) on top of the existing viaduct wall. It also includes 325 lineal feet of slumpstone block wall. This project is scheduled to be advertised for bids after May 10, 2004. A future project that may also require fencing is the Fairview Park/Placentia Avenue Trail Bridge. Staff has taken an inventory of all existing chain link fencing currently on public right -of -way or on public property (Attachment 5). As can be seen from this list, a significant amount of chain link currently exists, particularly within the City's park system. This inventory includes chain link fencing that is directly related to an athletic field of play, such as a baseball backstop or outfield fence. It should be noted that the soon -to -be renovated ath4ptic complex calls for the installation of new chain link fencing along the perimeters _of each of the four ball fields. Some backstop and outfield fencing may be as high as 15' -20'. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: FISCAL REVIEW: LEGAL REVIEW: Council may consider reviewing each project on an individual basis where staff is proposing to install fencing. In this way, Council may review the cost/benefit of each type of fencing system, and provide direction to staff. City Council may also direct staff to develop a new Council Policy or an amendment to the Streetscape and Median Development Standards concerning fencing materials on public property. Funding must be considered for any City project that requires permanent fencing to be installed. Funds would also need to be identified if Council directs that existing chain link fencing on City property be replaced with some other type of fencing system. • No legal review is required at this time. CONCLUSION: • • Staff has provided information on several common types of fencing systems, and the design /construction /maintenance costs related to each. Staff has also developed an inventory of existing chain link fencing locations on public property or on public right of way. Staff requests direction from Council on the use of chain link fencing for future city projects, as well as for existing City facilities using chain link. WILLIAM J. MORRIS Public Services Director /ch ATTACHMENTS: 1 Map of Joann Street Bike Trial Fence Improvement 2 Pictures of Joann Street Bike Trail 3 Pictures of Several Types of Common Fencing Systems 4 Fencing Use and Cost Matrix 5 Inventory of Existing Chain Link Fencing on City Property DISTRIBUTION: City Manager Development Services Director Administrative Services Director City Engineer Maintenance Services Manager Recreation Manager ChainLinkFenceonPublicProperty 5/4/04 11:00 a.m. 3 : }: :: .z.g • !:i:i:C; :� s i - :JJJ - : vT :l :.. ,,.i :.V:•n.n.,„„.., • • I 4 • V C T wi 1 E raVsk f$61-0) AncUutils IKON 4 - Im 04Aiti LINK FENCE : IV Wen{ A t rz D - LiII K. FENCE • 1 $V %A M. Pr ilretttiart SUS M .vrf. -, ww..a..RM:WwM KWA L. 'airoww ans FENCE USEGON AI TYPES FOR 1 • `.kS::.wII.n•.mw. .vw•wn•:roA :,•::: .,.n,?: ,k:. kt :•JJri4,J:; ^•:,. ,. n,. .v:.vwve�.,.,waM,m,.rnva.n,...: • • :t{\'4'PTW SA 42`!. \••w\ 0_QtTa \ '^' ^!OM "CA..\ w+�Y� A`C a\ \kC• \4+�^n - M K<S.t:•tiY \JM k^^:MWCJY%d ESTIMATED MAINIENARCE $ ¢yy¢ R L. • a! A UTE eXPDXIANCY YEARS •• t -z YEARs pow ^ ' sow env PARKS Ati w400„s YEOti. SY. YEARt 415.— : 30 YEAFil C AVERAGE • APPLICAOLI yy P. , . r tea`:. N.v:\,:::.:. ;: <. nt {..,vw.:: ?„ �.{•:::. w:. F• 41�M1X4T•.• dJfYNMe�NMa1Ff .�WWJ%Wliwx.:.�.:4..,;J: sir:: F.ZTAICIA .t t SCHOOL ..Io ..MA':4G.61]1wwWv Yypw:<:.i v :w,{wi4. GO COME, FRCEIKUNYS 4,YEARDL r . ..,.,. 1 - ...:...::... ,.,•w., n:.:N :,vw.nnww - ...... yyy.yss� • �� M ?i4Yw.n } w•.v E .• . . • , }..•� . ..i.:••i ,� ri y .v. ]y u • l ' RV� ..M1 nee. KE74 . �T �a'e Lid F 1 NDS(.1 € • JYG.r W ' •:::4 ATTACHMENT ?, � NO. I WROUGHT V ON TYPE-A (SOLI ii .`" '1 Tiffin ATTACHMENT 3 • NO. 2 WROUGHT IRON TYPE 3 (HOLLOW) 0 • NO. 3 CHAIN LINK FENCE (2 3/8" MESH) • NO. 4 CHAINLINK FENCE (2 3/8" MESH VINYL- COATED) • NO. 5 CHAIN LINK FENCE (2 3/8" MESH PRIVACY SLATS) • / PLASTIC • • NO. 6 CHAIN LINK FENCE (1 3 /4" MESH, VINYL- COATED) NO. 7 BLOCK WALL (SLUMPSTONE) • D • NO.8 BLOCK WALL (CINDERBLOCK) • NO. 9 WAINSCOTT WITH WROUGHT IRON ON TOP 0 • NO. 10 WOOD FENCE (STANDARD DOG-EARED) go I • ALTERNATIVES TO CHAIN-LINK FENCING ÷. "WOOD-GRAIN" VINYL SOLID FENCING PRICE: $26 per linear foot [5ft. high] $30 per linear foot [6ft. high] MATERIAL: Vinyl synthetic [available in autumn brown, clay or colonial white] *includes: posts, rails, caps and Pickets ADVANTAGES: Lifetime warranty, extremely durable construction, maintenance free, UV resistant to preserve look, provides solid wall for security. NAN" ar" ly)Qt'c, hub,/ 03 Ill X19 Ar41Ptt mu air . 14 art^ rost; 4 Manufacturers claim that this stone -look, double reinforced construction is virtually unbreakable, providing unparalleled security - "STONE- LOOK" VINYL SOLID FENCING PRICE: $30 per linear foot [3ft. high] $40 per linear foot [6ft. high] MATERIAL: Vinyl synthetic exterior, re- enforced internal construction [galvanized steel] *includes: posts, rails, caps ADVANTAGES: Lifetime warranty, extremely durable construction, maintenance free, UV resistant to preserve look, provides solid wall for security, comes in six color patterns Black Granite Brown Granite Desert Granite • Gray Granite Beige Granite White Granite FENCING EXAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URRN CENTER CB for CL Q:\TUC Fencing Examples.doc Chain-link fencing used at construction site @ Tukwila Pkwy and Andover Park E Page 1 of 4 E - Chain-link with barbed security wire @ Prologis/East Andover Park business park Chain-link with barbed security wire @ City of Tukwila maintenance site on Minkler Ave. f\ti OarS tOt tC. 11404/ rvIS 12/13/2007 11:39:00 AM 1. 1 LS1C)-7 FENCING XAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URBBN CENTER Rail fencing divides parking lot from-* street traffic @ Minlder and Andover Park W. CB for CL Q: \TUC Fencing Examples.doc Chain -link with barbed security wire bordering Home Depot and Christensen walking trail @ 180 and Sperry [rusted due to exposure to weather] Page 2 of 4 E- Typical walling that surrounds the Wig Development, Southcenter Square. 12/13/2007 11:39:00 AM • FENCING EXAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URF,N CENTER Stone walling that borders the back portion of Target retail center 4 CB for CL Q:\TUC Fencing Examples.doc Page 3 of 4 Low wood/lattice fencing that borders Sizzler restaurant on Southcenter Pkwy [much of the lattice is in poor condition, destroyed and broken apart] <- White lattice fencing that borders the Target parking lot and Tukwila pond in TUC 12/13/2007 11:39:00 AM 0 FENCING EXAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN . CENTER Fencing that borders Best Western from the Green River off of West Valley Highway [combination of chain-link, barbed- wire and dilapidated wooden slats] CB for CL Q:\TUC Fencing Examples.doc <— Solid vinyl fencing that borders an apartment complex at West Valley Highway and Green River 3-rail wooden fencing bordering a walking trail behind office spaces off of S158th at the intersections of Embassy & Diplomat Page 4 of 4 12/13/2007 11:39:00 AM FENCING EXAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN CENTER Within the Tukwila Urban Center [TUC] there is not much diversity of fencing types. The southern area of the TUC — which is dominated by warehousing and office facilities — maintains the largest stock of fenced areas. The majority of these fences are tall chain -link fences, often adorned with three rows of barbed wire — or in some cases razor wire — atop each section. These function mostly as dividers for parking lots and property lines for the tightly grouped businesses in the area. The utilization this fencing type in the commercial and warehousing areas is common, as the fencing is inexpensive to install and is effective for its purpose of securing the site. Chain link fencing is proposed at the new building site at 180 and Sperry Drive as a visual barrier for security r It has been argued that chain -link fencing should be utilized to this end. Since this area is still part of the commercial Urban Center the City would like a different type of fencing to be considered for use at this site. One such option would be to use a solid, wood -style vinyl fencing. A far superior vinyl material should be used for the longevity and aesthetic value of the structure as well as for the purpose of securing the site. Pragmatically speaking it would be far easier for an intruder to scale a chain - link fence, using the holes in the fencing's basic structure as foot -holds than for such a person to attempt to scale a solid, vinyl material which provides no such advantages. The applicant contends that the proposed chain -link fencing is the most cost - effective type of fencing that can be installed. But a number of other non - monetary factors should be considered in making this determination. A quick search of cost per linear foot of fencing types reveals that a quality, synthetic material coated chain -link fencing will run about $8 per linear foot. This is one of the cheapest options available but a number of factors go into the quality of chain -link fencing and should be considered before committing to this type. The Chain Link Fence Manufacturing Institute [CLFMI] conducted a study on the quality of many different gauges of chain -link fencing and determined that inexpensive, low- CB for CL Page 1 of 7 12/12/2007 4:35:00 PM Q:\Fencing Examples.doc FENCING EXAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN CENTER gauge fencing could be easily damaged by children, animals and adverse weather conditions. When determining what type of chain -link to use, two factors should be considered: framework and coating. The framework of the fence [the gauge thickness of the metal used] is the most critical factor. Improper gauge thickness can lead to premature failure or damage caused by external forces. The coating of the fence is also important. Typically, two types of coating are used for chain -link: zinc outer coating or a poly - olefin outer coating. The zinc coating is the most commonly used type. The bare, exposed metal needs some sort of protective coating to prevent rusting and damage from exposure to the weather. Poly - olefin coatings are a synthetic material that is less commonly used but more reliable and durable than the commonly used zinc material. Poly olefin material is far superior in protecting the fencing's framework but the quality of the coating and density in which it is coated on the fence also plays an important role in the longevity of the fence's use. Inferior coatings can promote a more rapid deterioration of the framework and can critically damage the internal integrity of the fence in ways that weaken its durability. Typically, manufacturers will issue a 15 year warranty on chain -link fencing, another factor that should play into the decision to utilize this material. The use of a solid vinyl fencing type — utilizing a far superior vinyl /poly - olefin synthetic construction — would be a much more effective, longer - lasting option to be considered at this site when taking into account the long -term usage of the material. Vinyl fencing options are relatively more expensive than chain -link options. However additional factors should come into play when considering what material to use on this project. The security provided by a solid vinyl constructed fence is in some respects superior to a chain -link option. Vinyl material is tough to scale because of its solid construction and slippery surface. High quality synthetically blended vinyl — often mixed with a poly - olefin material to provide virtually impenetrable rigidity — can provide far superior protection from an intruder FENCING EXAMPLES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN CENTER intent on cutting a hole in the fencing rather than scaling it as well. The lack of visibility through a solid construction vinyl fence provides a psychological deterrent to potential intruders as little is know about what lies on the other side of the fencing. Vinyl slat inserts for chain -link fencing are available to this end, but when added to the cost of the chain -link frame — plus the additional labor cost to install the slats between each section of chain -link weave — the cost of the two options becomes more equal in comparison. One cost estimate for this type of fencing was $30 per linear foot installed. Another factor to consider is the longevity of the fencing itself. Most manufacturers provide lifetime warranty's on their vinyl fencing options, while chain -link fencing carries limited warranties ranging from 15 -35 years, depending upon the outer coating. Solid vinyl fencing comes in an attractive form that is aesthetically pleasing to the area in contention. Manufacturers have created a number of solid vinyl options, one of which is a wood -grain design which replicates the look of a solid wood fence (see page 2 above for photo). The grain of the wood is detailed into the construction and its solid form provides unparalleled strength. Manufacturers also produce a stone -look vinyl that replicates the color and texture of a solid stone wall, providing all of the traditional benefits of a solid vinyl construction in an attractive design form. The stone look is not only durable because of the outer vinyl construction, but also provide additional security through a solid steel substructure within the wall itself. These options cost in the range of $30 -40 per linear foot. CB for CL Page 3 of 7 12/12/2007 4:35:00 PM Q:\Fencing Examples.doc ?et . s;.. QRLG.1_N L A quarter century ago, Garden reinvented the theory and practice of outdoor lighting with a liminaire and optical assembly that dramatically improved visibility in the nigtttime environmert. By day, the Form Ten was the first architecturally significant design available to the lighting plan designer. u FLLCc X.SIEMS 4� Continuously refined since its inception, the Form Ten remains the standard for high performance outdoor area lighting. Often imitated but never matched, Gardco's six precision crafted, multi- faceted optical systems minimize light trespass, sharply cut oft glare and uniformly illuminate. There is no more versatile, more efficient illumination system available to engineer and architect. L. :.:: , , Q. Ph.Ll.rri ATE1_,L -l.:i_ (. The pages that follow Introduce the fundamentals of visibility and how it is achieved through the application of five unique optical systems. A practical example is provided to demonstrate the remarkable performance of the system, and how optical systems can be interchanged and rotated within the housing styles to meet she geometry and aesthetic. _ L4- _...._.._______L4: Durability is uncompromised— rugged construction, extruded aluminum housings, weather -tight sealing — Form Ten design and construction is synonymous with quality. S i_ IF1 :AI10NS__ 1627 Complete ordering and specification information is provided. Your professional Garden lighting representative can assist with further information and specification assistance. FORM FUNCTION PERFORMANCE ""r.' - A fundamental difference between competing lighting systems is pe rformance - and performance ultimately effects cost, That said, it is important i o recognize that th patented Form Ten X The benefits of higher performance levels are numerous In marry applications, fewer luminaires are necessary to illuminate a sit e, compounding fixture, pole, installation and maintenance savings. These more efficient luminaires typically enable mounting at lower heights, further reducing initial and long term service costs. 9 pttcs ' Pbw Rao fen nonce ome includes mnicaf tangenr'ai op€ies. The Form Ten X optics am 'oversized' so that tang lumen Output can be directed into measurably wider distributions, enabling wide pole spaci at most mounting neighs. optical systems make these luminaires the best performing lighting instruments available. The Sandra Form Ten X optical system has been awarded U. S. Patent #5690422. The Conical Fan Reflector The Form Ten X reflector facets farm a fan around Inc :amo - with each facet posiicned to ae preciseiy tangent to the too of the arc tube. This patented design captures and redIfects lumens to the critical angles lust beiow cutoff - delivering the tootcandle values essential to wider spacings. Highly Reflective Material An essential component of the Form Ter X is an anodized aluminum with reflectivity approaching 95%. Themirror-like finish of the faceted optics substantially improves the efficiency of ens redirected by the reftecton Uniform Distributions Gardcos long- standing commitment to high pedormance lighting is ultimately reflected in the distribution created by the Fort Ten X conical ref ectorr The 40 distribution provides exceptionally wide and uniform illumination free from not spots and striations Maximum to min lion ratios are excellent, and there is sharp cutoT at the reodired angle for each distrIbbtion . House Side Shield The avaiiaole douse e s'iielc is a Natural 02. 0 to eliminate house S ale dminamon wrs2r2 absofu e desired The solein arrives tacfcry detailed , captdrec with.n retiectm - Rotatable Optical Systems Gerona pioneered the connect of rosy a octics - which, enable pole orientation and light distribution to be independent of one another. It also enades reorientation of the optical system should traffic patterns charge. The Farm Ten system is comprised of high -; W u d performance optical reflectors — six multi - faceted.. Itiy layered refie tors which are unequaled in Mei ability toeficiently shape, direct and distribute lamp output. They provide remarkable flex bility in precisely = `matching; light distribution patterns to specific site • ;ma -; .. geometry and mounting requirements, Because each reflector is fully interchangeable throughout housing 0 , shapes and styles. a uniform site aesthetic - can be achievedtegardless of luminaire mounting height -. Because Gardc`o optical systems direct a higher percent of lamp lumens into desired areas, design cotena may be aih eved with wider pole spacings WrderSpacings can provide immediate savings- a .ee in lurmraires. poles. trenching and other installation a- - :costs and longterm savings in and ,:;. TY Type 4X Type ax conical fan optics produce an asymmetncal distribution pattern that directs the majority of the light forward and equally on both sides of the luminaire In a back -to -back configuration the 4X produces a square symmetrical pattern ideally suited for area lighting. Applications • Wide Area Lighting • Wide Roadway • Penmeter Only Lighting • Low Glare Requirements • Minimal Mounting Locations Typical Spacing Single luminaire 2 MH forward a 6 MH lateral. Back- to-back luminaires 2 MH forward x 6 MH lateral. Type I Type I optics produce a long and narrow distribution pattern that disperse light equally on both sides of the luminaire with peak light output falling along the roadway or walkway. This distribution is most useful in illuminating long narrow areas. Applications • Narrow Walkways • Building Alleyways • Median Mounted Divided Highways Typical Spacing t MH forward and behind x 6-7 MH lateral Type III Type III optics produce an asymmetrical distnbutron pattern that directs the majority of the light forward and equally on both sides of the luminaire. In a back 4o-back configuration the Type III produces a rectangular pattern which can extend pole spacings. Applications ® Semi-Wide Walkways ® Semi -Wide Roadways ® Area Lighting • Parking Entries/Exits • Perimeter Lighting Typical Spacing Single luminaire 5 1/2 MH on center. Back- to-back luminaires: 4 -6 MH on center Type Q Type 0 optics produce a symmetrical square distribution pattern ttat distributes light equally on all sides of the luminaire The optical system is universal for most area lighting applications Applications • Area Lighting • Wide Median Mounted Divided Highways • Parking Erttnes/Exrts Typical Spacing 5 x 5 MH on center. Type FM Type IV forward throw optics distribute the majority of light in front on the luminaire with sharp cut -off of the pattern behind the luminaire (HS) This distribution is useful for areas where illumination is to be precisely confined in one direction. Applications • Wall Mount Requirements • Sports (i.e Tennis Courts) • Perimeter Lighting with Surrounding Residential Typical Spacing 2 MN forward x 4 MH lateral Type VS The VS optics use a vertically positioned lamp These Type 5 cutoff optics produce a square uniform distribution pattern Applications • Wide Area Lighting • Higher Glare Acceptable • Stringent Uniformity Requirements Typical Spacing 6 x 6 MH on center. Providing for good visibility is more difficult in practice than in theory . as site. aesthetic economic and maintenance factors are introduced. Designing for good visibility means ensuring that there is an adequate level of illumination, uniform pavement luminance, and minimal glare . in admbon to good visibility , light trespass should be controlled, the daytime product appearance should be appropriate and both inc initial and life cycle cost of the design should be considered. ADEQUATE LIGHTING LEVELS hint 'eq. _ ', i. eUiLil ly rise ;, rq rl'zt'rc`n :P e q;anC r;i Il ;ni L U a ltiays hrlant tc cons ' hr su w.nidl rq environlronl. A rc-sasrant park : Oti o dark uou:.t y road II re0ulm s Icwer light nerels 713n that nanw rBS12Uraril pafdi'IJ lot in a dcvhntcrwn area adjacent w ot brightly I:t commercial estabnshmen +s UNIFORM PAVEMENT LUMINANCE The second component of visibility is uniformity of pavement luminance. When the eye has to continually adjust to lighter and darker areas, vision is significantly impaired. A uniformly tit site appears lighter than a site which rH .: c.,mewhat higher light levels, but poor uniformity. Although re arc vsoctated with specifying luminance values Itn , ::iccrusl a 12 ac rnd TI; (luminance values (footcandtes), it is arara to repents, that : iv eye sees luminance and not illuminacce Furtnernore, ;xcause of the 'ellec:ed angles at light that the eye sees, lregcent'rp area, in to exs P r,y ;ms1cm I „m:niu rslttnS (5 to 1 or below maximum to minimum fccU3ndlesj may appear cen rmitarm It is because of this phenomenon that Gardco Lighting recommends designing to footcandle levels of 10 -ta-1 to 15 -to-1 maximum to minimum which will result in a site that appears uniformly lit. GLARE CONTROL The factor most destructive to lighting performance is glare. Simply stated, glare is bright direct light from ate unshielded source. At night. the human eye is drawn to the most luminous element in Its field of vision. Uncontrolled, glare is distracting, causes discomfort to the viewer, and adversely affects visibility. Glare entering the eyes causes a veiling luminance and Impairs one's ability to identify objects in the site. Two forms of glare are recognized. The most obvious form, discomfort glare, causes us to avert our eyes from its source. The effects of discomfort glare are mainly psychological: in increasing irritation and tiredness. The second type of glare, disability glare. results in reduced visual performance and visibility. Both types of glare are potentially dangerous and influence traffic safety. 6 reuse lne eye sees re s 1e extreme'ry levels app "ee: :e TTeleT 1,,11121,es. APPL1/ -I TYP Standard TYPE Rotated Optic TYPE III Stanek TYPE W (PM WWI Moak Overall Site Parking Statistics Average: 3.29 Maximum: 13.71 Maximum to Minimum : 13.18 Average to Minimum: 3.16 TYPE V Rotated Opt. Careful attention to four basic design considerations will inevitably lead to superior visibility and the best value. Minimum tootcandie levels must be established, preferably, a maintained level using a depreciation factor that ensures illumination levels are sustained over time. Mounting heights are of fundamental importance and have a direct influence on the r and foratian of lu wattages at lamps, and initial anifi life cycle casts. Mounting height number may! be a restr by l ocal ordinance, acce ssibility and capa bility of service equipment and the spatial relation between the luminaires and landscape. Type and wattage of lamp includes an analysis of the color, cost, life and performance characteristics of various HID sources. Gardco reconenends the choice of clear lamps, to optimize the performance of the Form Ten optical systems. A footcandle printout verifies that the objectives of the ligftirig plan are accomplished... a one fal tcandle minimum maintained, with a maximum t o minimum ratio no greater than 15:1. TYPE II Rotated Optlu TYPE It Wall Mount TYPE III with NS TYPE with NS Option Option Standard Related Optics TYPE IV YMI Standard Maximum to minimum tootcandle ratios f between 10:t and 151 assure uniform appearing ' lumin When mounting heights, lamp types and optical, systems are selected and placed as shown at pavement left — tight levels ance. and ' -- uniformity criteria can be verified. The integrity of Form Ten appearance and performance owes to a design and construction philosophy without compromise. The weather -tight luminaire housing is sealed at all points of rnatenal transition with pressure - injected silicone, and the door frame seals to the luminaire with hollow -core, memory- retentive silicone Arm assemblies are designed with a double -nut- through -bolt that effectively maces it impossible to malign luminaire and pole The presumed electrical harnesses is triple- checked poor to shipment. In short, for the architect, contractor and owner. the benefits are immediate, long term and quite obvious ' ire double-nur Ui Chi gn'Do0 makes d impossible to - a),satian the lumtane and Sole! Note die deputy ol. the rnOrfal col6buctva an0 aluminum edra lions. Willi provi0¢ renarkaple falo5 :� Gardco Duneered Ine CO nscsi d toouess access for ease of msallaron an0 service Eann Sjocesnmm assembly swings, commend away to reveal uncleriymgcomoonents'tne acoris :,secure0 wipe sating - loaded raidvare for pukk reiamomp ,ilia' ?: �- ,;Our rut sysoont irclud^S 0 wck-disaDnneci elan cal compcn¢res and ninces do∎vn io access Ice u,i;itel turost traYiTneentire System is eacory s e.w - eu an0 ae-lestea ado, (0 snlynenl Al every pmnt a entry ire luminaire sewed apainir treceneaaion a 'P moisrae alit dn0 ivoectswh Oressure viecteo sliC l and memory-ietenme silicone gaskets No: only boas ire sea CO bob ©i Chamber DreServe lee lllaninating _, y ciu2derorist al Ine mmaea. Oceton ieneclor, out d Cantiioaes to longer 500351 add eleCU ' comoaneill ule - a measurable COmnoutosl to long term value FEATURES The Form Ten is the product of nearly thirty years of thoughtful engineering, craftsmanship and continuous quality improvement. II is ideally conceived and adapted to its purpose and environment In terms of quality, value and return on investment, it remains the specification that has no equal. ORDERING PREFIX SIZE EH EAntXO 14' H Faerralea 14' EH Eo.,cen 19' H FagrCed 19' H latrrlea 719' H Taxxzel 26' 400MH WATTAGE 14' 19' 100MH 2.SOMH 150MH 400MH 1 751A 93OpSMH' 200MH 310PSMH' 250MH 35OPSMH 175PSMH,a 400PSMH' 100MPS A50PSMH' 150HP$' 400HPS MH Meal Halide PS41 apse Start Magi Hall& IFS Mgll Pressure Sodium EH 51y1e Sue A B' C D 14' 14' T 6' 5' 35Emm 1789m 152irm 127mm 19' 19' 10' 9' 5' 404105 0400, Mon 127.o H Style Sue A B' C D 14' 14' r 2' 5' Zion 178ram 152md 127mm 19' 17 10' 2" 5' 483mm 254mm 51mrd 12Th., 26' 26' 12' 12' 8' 6E0m 375mo 305om 203.0 CONFIGURATION 1 Style omen* 2 Two e1W' 2090 Two OW 3 Tripe 090' 30120 T15He0120' 4 Oled At50105y DE 36_ 1000MH 10034411 750PSMH' 750PSMH' 1000PSMH' 1000PSMH' 750NPS 75011PS 1000HPS FH /H ARM MOUNT E O R M L O Notes 1. Madan base lamp. 2. Amilable with vertical imp oecs only. 3. Operates 55V lamp. 4. M138 or M153. 5. Uses BT37 lamps only. 6. Horizontal optics require M1000NSN/9137 lamp. 7.61132 or M154. 8. M135 or M155. 9. M149 only. Horizontal atlas require MS750SRIF143W8131 Nog. 10. M137 or M152 1 1 23 29 EPA5 Sole Twin Alm 180P Sad 11 4A 55 11 2.3 29 2,1 40 5.5 tPA1 S1pe Twin Arm 18C Wad 35 70 8.9 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco arm mounted Square Form Ten products are sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 10 )O watts The EH units are manufactured from mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class 1 anodizing. The H style luminaires are die- formed aluminum with a thermoset polyester finish. Both products can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION IN'S1ra 1 heel 3 Type 10 4X fp IV(19' /T17only) FM Type IV 0 Type 11lim VS Typev 14' ar 19' sanr6len .4Th rryS sap en 25'swdiedwtlW sq ten Medml han aUW mzo m 14'm. FC3V' Fu11 CUon Type III FCVS• Fat CUoa Type V ' 19' 320PSMH only Supplied r7MS32001/ECOMIC/PS lamp Appma 87 Single Fodue 3D to 249 55 NM 0 940 900100 sM Fobpe 3) Ito 13610 55110 24910 9511E 43.140 WATTAGE See Table Below BLA BRA NA BRP RIP DC SC VOLTAGE 120 208 240 277 347 480 QUAD 12NAa24wp7 Way WI 10 UN FINISH Black Anodized Bronze Anodized Natural Anodized (Mpdaa bars aaoa0Eon DI ad HPE 0000 0091 Bronze Paint Black Paint Optional Color Paint Sae*FtrL deipplion m sham n Cob dim GO& e: 3L4111754 Special Color Paint Pr1w sop3/mh NM FINISH B uf45 BRA NA DC SC ERP BRP BLP DC SC OPTIONS CD HS MF PC PCR POLY OS MU AP AT SG PTF2 PTF3 PTF4 DIMLLLSI0N Ode: i19 temp 8Orman 012% EfWsm224 I N 84. andomoblo6510s YS orals mb sal Nm hoe me7 Molls 48V4' /oaM- 14).13L0{Hie -19)1 d2111-201. ' mb lot am IMO a 011Hq and 9 TH -19/ Ike: 6.49 lanoM D. Am, 1144 OPTIONS CD MU HS UB F AP MF AT PC SG PCR PTF2 POLY PTF3 OS PTF4 Clear Drop Dillu :er OH Style 4nry) Internal Houseside Snield (Stymied standard rah FM colts) Fang Mast Arm Fitter Pnotocontrol and Receptacle p4A we1480V 10004 manun mitred Winne map'.) Pletocontrol Receptacle only (10004 maximum untitled umnakeraoape) Poly4arbonate Sap lens M 0w m ea q00 fUAwilh 4x antis. 45OW mu.mml ()Lenz Standby 10' Uplift Bracket Az;ustable Knuckle — Pole Mount lOnY anal* nth l and 26180. muting) Adpotable Knuckle — Tenn Mount (Fits 239 tom. WA rah 14' maintop) Sap Glass lets M loz d IM plod (Supplied slmdard 411 4)( onto and 26'V5.) Pole Top Fitter - 2 3R• Dia. Term Pole Top Fitter - 3 - 31/2' Da. Telen Pole T o p Filler - 3 1 / 2 - 4 0 a . fern PREFIX SIZE d JEH EoIntOd 14' JH Fablia103 14' JEH blinded 19' JH Fabricated 19' JH Fabricated 26' WATTAGE 14_ 1r 100MH' 250MH 150MH 40eMH 175MH 250PSMH' 200MH 320PSMH' 250MH 350PSMH 175PSMII" 400PSMH 100HPS 450PSMH' 150HP5' 250HPS 400HPS MH MUaI Hali& PSMH Pulse Sad Metal f6Etle HPS high Pressure Sodirn . . •. ■A• 1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco yoke mounted Form Ten products are sharp cutoff luminaires for high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 watts. JEH units are manufactured from mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class 1 anodizing The JH luminaires are die - formed aluminum with a thermoset polyester finish. Both products feature a choice of six (6) interchangeable rotatable precision segmented optical systems. CONFIGURATION 1 Single Asenby Ill 2St 1000MH' 1000MH 750PSMH' 750PSMH' 1030PSMH' 1000PSMH' 750PSMH 750HPS 1000HPS PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION Ir MALI ne 1 Type1 3 Type El 4X Type M 097 T19'ony) FM Type IV 0 TypeV Jfal®tvEna VS Type 1r rd 19' Spgf 1ne torMe rot lean' sorbed oh sea era*. Mein We. 200W ee on 14' PUS FC3V• Fun Cutoff Type Ill FCVS• Full Cutoff Type V • 19' 320PSMH only. Supplied wAAS320/BU'ED2BALCRS lamp Notes t. Medium base Mop. 2. Available with *Meal 01w optics Dory. 3. Operates 55V lamp. 4.14138 or M153. 5. Uses BT37 lamps onty. 6. HonaIPnl 064es repam M10001PS41inr37 Mow. 7. M132 or M154. B M135 or MIS5. 9. M149 only. Horizontal notes were M5750/PSMU- HOR/8137 Ia10 10. M137 or M152. JH/JEH Style She A B C D EPA (oq 14 14' 7' in 1S' 1.4 3'3m 'Mae alwm 1111m 19 19' 10' 23' 15' 25 arm amn SIAM 3nm 26 26' 12' 25' 15' 2 B eorm am MY= U. WATTAGE See Table Below ORDERING VOLTAGE 120 208 240 277 347 480 QUAD 1212081241277 harry Gelb 2775 RM 1 n FINISH OPTIONS Di BLA BRA NA OC SC 1Si1.5de BAP BLP DC SC CD HS PC PCR POLY OS UB SG FINISH OPTIONS BLA Black Anodized CD Clear Drop Diffuser UN Style ml) BRA Bror¢e Anodized HS Internal Houseside Shield NA Mature' Anodized ISwpeed stead oh FM opal Wndaod recta raker on F Fusing JH ad Bpb' mils udbh PC Pnotocontrol and Receptacle BAP Bronze Paint NA.* 483V1 BLP Black Paint PCR PMtocontrol Receptacle only OC Optional Color Paint POLY Poiyarbonate Sag lens Spray ML&sip:limas Sloan It lee d US glass. WA OR 41 cobs. in the ColorSeetlun Sock 45155 nrmwmt to 01 - 063 4 OS Quart Standby SC Special Color Paint UB Quick Disoorplea for Ballast Tray (AAhts.:04o&odwl 5G Sag Glass Lens M Ewa na pass) (S ppe* tread wash 40 ores as most DIMENSIONS• MOUNTING a B A'm Mb(c W No AIM WATTAGE 14' 100MN' 15oMH 175MH 200MH 250019 'COMPS 150HPS' WEIWH 25 2500111 400M11 250PSMH' 32OPSMH' 350PSMH 400PSMH' 250HPS 400HPS Mil Meal mite PSMH Rose Oat Meal Ibfide HPS lice Assn Soto HOUSING E ENUOb H FahirAed E WOO H F2hrtated H Fa icale3 ur 1000MH 750PSMH' 1000PSMH' 750HPS SIZE GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Round Wall Mounted Form Ten products are cylindrical (CW) or semi - spherical (MW) sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 400 watts. Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class 1 anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of four (4) interchangeable precision optical systems. 19' 19' 14' I il® 14' 1 Type! 3 Type BI 40 Type N (19'7T19'only) FM Type y Fear Full Cutoff To III • 19' 320PSMH may. Supplied wfMS320/BU1ED2BALCIPS Ump T19' Now 1. kNdiun base lamp. 2. Operates 55V tarp. 3. Uses B137 Lamps only 4. Requires M1000/PS4bVT37 lamp. 5. M138 or H153. 6.51132 or M154. 7. M135 or M155. B. M149 qtly. Horizontal optics re uue MS750/P5A3U- HORA3T37 lane. PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION WEIWHIWHT out Widh B C O 4 14' r 6' 2' asw irre. 152. sae® 19 19' 10' 9' 2' .epfrn sam nom saem Ti 9 i9' 1 9' 2' Yara� aQm 2219. eaev. WATTAGE See Table Below 01A Black Anodized BRA Bronze Anodized NA Natural Anodized (WIe1®1 Gashes sable BE et WE ices rein BRP Bronze Paint BLP Black Paint OC Optional Color Paint *dye �IYor Edam n to fah Sidon Gade4c CC-FA/024 SC Special Color Pairs 9Ard slaw We due) ORDFRLNG VOLTAGE 120 208 240 277 347 480 QUAD 1207208240271 aday lied 5,277V FINISH OPTIONS FINISH Emig BLA BRA NA OC SC BRP ELP OC SC CD Clear Drop Diffuser IBEAsE SMes mryl HS Internal Houseside Shield ( Supplied stooardwan FM ogiw F Fte.inp PC Protoconiml and Receptacle 810A wan 4804 PCR Photocontrol Receptacle only POLY Poryrarbonate Sap lens Oi nm d lh plan WA wen 4% optics) OS Quartz Standby LS Quick Disconnect for Ballast Tray SG Sap Glass Lens m WO tbl POSH (9twbe1 vartlard rib 4x optts ) D VI NS10 . BE/BRIBHT S n me B C 4 14• T 2' SS. nom Sam 19 19' 10. 2' aam 1540ea soem r19 19' 12' 2' flaw sate !um OPTIONS CO HS PC PCR POLY OS UB SG PREFIX S 2 A WATTAGE 14 1U IWOMH' 250MH 1506444 400MH 1 75M 250pSMH' 250MH' 320pSM 175PSMH" 35OPSMH 100HPS 400PSMH•, 150HPS' 45OPSMH' 75OPSMH' 2500 PS 400H PS 750HPS SIZE 14' 19' 26' MH Meal Halide PSM11 Rise gad MOa0 Maude FPS Hgh Pressure 5oNml ZOT 1000MH 750PSMH' 1000PSMH' 750HPS 100011PS CONFIGURATION GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco A Style Form Ten products are rectilinear sharp cutoff luminaires for high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 watts. Housings are manufactured from mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class 1 anodizing. Each of these performance luminaires can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision optical systems. 2 Twin @ 18CP 3 Triple I90P 4 Oa4 Asmniy PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTION Notes 1. Meduao base Lane 2.74 250MH trnuaurs 403I3de in single and twin tmfigur4ims only 3. Available wIb vertical lane Optics only. 4. Operates 555 Lamp. 5. Available wnn oorSanlat urn optks onry. 6. M149 only. Horizontal °pass require MS750NS9u HORIST37 umo. 7. Horizontal op'Ics require M1000/PS4V9137 lamp 8. M137 or M152. 1 M138 or M153. 10. M132 or M153. 11. M135 or M155. 14 14' 21' r 4' 2.375 ism0 saga Irmo. ,@w lain 19 19' 29' 10' 6' 4' 1a0 roan Merit 1m.e Ma.s 26 26' 39' IS 0 4' ssom 991.3 Haase s.. Mass A STY' F FORM 1 0 WATTAGE See Table Below 1.3 2.7 27 2.5 5.1 5.1 3.4 6.0 6B O_R_DERJ_ G VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 621 griP I 1 type 1 3 Type 18 40 Type IV ( only) FM 100 D Type EtkiLlre VS TypeV tf awl 17 &Im dwitJoy* sip Imo. 20 appfd Intl sip Oa lens Mean Oat 17544 re on 11' urns FCSV• H4 75250 TYlle II FCVS• FA Watt Type V • 10 320PSMH onry Supplied w/MS320/BINFICKLOPS lamp FINISH OPTIONS BLA Back Anodized H5 Internal Houseslde Shield BRA Bronze AnOCued (Suzolied dadad with FM Wiest NA Natural Anod'aed F Fusing (11 Hatt OC Optional Color Paint PC Photocontrol aryl Receptacle SOetty MU/Anton es sham (14.301114133V. 1000W mamsm the Cae Surfer Gut animal enou6e ice) a 00/1/17024 PCB Plotoconnal Receptacle only SC Soecial Color Paint POLY Polycarbolate Sag tem Pat slat pee chip) (610 4 It otase N/A Mesh 4x optics) 120 BLA HS 208 BRA F 240 NA PC 277 OC PCR 347 SC POLY 480 GS QUAD SG 12020924)277 lathy ledb277V D IMLN SIGNS 340x 6216s 122 Ds 't11ar 9 55340 71 to 06 Ito 226 65 nap. a 20,020 1131D5 214 to 3851W tam a,. 171 100 OS Quartz Standby SG Sag Glass Lens pn Tel A TA glass) (Supplied sundad with In optcs and 2615) SPECIF Housing (A, EH, H, J, W B) Extruded housings (A, EH, JEH, WE, and BE) feature four precisely mitered and welded 0.130" aluminum side sections. Fabricated housings (H, JH, WI!, 81-B are single piece, multi- formed 0.06" aluminum sheet with an integral reinforcing spline All units feature press formed aluminum top, which is welded to housing sides . After finishing, pressure injected silicone is applied to all miters and points of material transition providing a continuous weather -tight seal. Luminaires are prewired and suitable for installation without accessing housing. Form Ten S (EP, EA, EW) lower housing is composed of precisely mitered and internally welded aluminum extrusions Upper section consists of 0.25" extruded ICATIONS acrylic sides and aluminum sheet top. Prismatic units (EPS, EAS, EWS) feature internal prismatic acrylic which provides a subtle crystalline sparkle. White translucent unites (EPG, EAG, EWG) feature internal white diffusing acrylic which provides a soft. evenly illuminated glow. Pressure injected silicone provides a continuous weather -tight seal at all points of material transition. Arm (EH, H, BE, BH EA) Extruded aluminum arm features integral channel to support tie rods maintaining housing to pole (or wall bracket) alignment. Yoke (JEH, JH) The co-axial fitter -yoke assembly is fabricated from extruded rectangular aluminum tubing with welded mitered corners. THe yoke - to-pole fitter is designed and manufactured specifically for the pole, ensuring transitions are clean and continuous. Form Ten S (EP) 9/16' diameter parallel yokes of high strength, low mass schedule 40 steel are precisely contoured to match the housing silhouette Yoke assembly is designed for mounting compatibility with Gardco CA4.5 pole. Welds are not visible at the luminaire or pole attachment. Yoke is electro-galvanized and coated with satin black polyurethane Wall Bracket Hooking diecast aluminum wall bracket conceals 10 gauge mounting plate. Form Ten S (EW) ballast is mounted in wall bracket At the head of the Gardco optical system, two levels of mirror - polished facets are precisely aligned with the arc tube of an HID lamp so as to present It with optimal reflective surfaces The configured, hammertone uptight recovery box directs lumens out and away from below the luminaire, eliminating hotspots. Precise lamp positioning assures sharp cutoff of light minimizing glare and controlling light trespass. No optical system can consistently match the predictable, exacting performance of this faceted, sharp cutoff Form 10. Lens Mitered, extruded anodized aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass in a sealed manner sing hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber Concealed stainless steel latch and hinge permit easy tooliess access to the luminaire Optical Systems The segmented Form Ten optical system is homogenous sheet aluminum, electro-chemically brightened, anodized, and sealed The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve desired distribution. The mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell. 50MH, 70MH, and 100MH units have medium base lampholder. Metal halide units with horizontally positioned mogul base sockets featured lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioned mogul base sockets feature lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube posrtionirg Electrical Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20 °F High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits Metal Halide and Mercury Vapor ballasts are medium regulation auto transformer providing ±10% variation from rated input voltage Component -to- component wring within the luminaires will carry no more Man 80% of rated current ands listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150 °F or higher. Finish Painted units feature hardcoat fade resistant thermal cured polyester finish. Extruded units (A. EH. JEH. WE and BE) are available with Aluminum Association Architectural Class I Anodizing. Labels All Fixtures bear UL and /or CUL (where applicable) Wet Location labels, Gardco reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as pan of the company's continuing product improvement program Gardcos segmented reflector optical system has been awarded U.S Patent #3746854. The Gardco Form Ten X optical system has been awarded U S Patent #5690422. Optional clear or amber drop acrylic diffuser provide a decorative accent to luminaires Memory retentive silicone gasket wont take a set which can result in gaps after relamping. Flat surfaces, sharp corners and precise geometric proportions characterize the pure architectural forms of the Square Form 10 product line. Gullwing • Fascia Plates Floodlight DESEGNER i L 100 Line Sconces LIGHTING 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 800/227 -0758 510/357 -6900 in California Fax: 510/357 -3088 www.sitelighting.com © Gardco Copyright 2003 Genlyte Thomas Group LLC All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. 79103 - 1/0103 Notes: Job: Type: ►I'N 01 LEIl FORM 10 SQUARE EH /H /HT ARM MOUNT GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco arm mounted Square Form 10 products are cutoff luminaires for high intensity discharge lamps up to 000 watts. The EH units are manufactured from mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class 1 anodizing. The H and HT style luminaires are dieformed aluminum with a thermoset polyester finish. Both products can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Flat glass lens luminaires provide full cutoff performance. Sag Lens luminaires provide cutoff performance. ORDERING PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION H H H H Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration Not all combinations and configurations are valid, Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. PREFIX EH14 14° Square Extruded Luminaire EH19 19° Square Extruded Luminaire H14 14° Square Fabricated Luminaire H19 19" Square Fabricated Luminaire HT19 19" Tall Square Fabricated Luminaire H26 26" Square Fabricated Luminaire DISTRIBUTION Horizontal Lamp 1 Type I 3 Type III 4X'• Type IV (19/719 only) FM Type IV 0 Type V 1. t9' and T19" luminaires, 400w and below are supplied with flat glass lens standard. For wattages above 400w, XF' flat lens is supplied standard. 2. MH/PSMH 400w Type 4X luminaires require the E28/13T28 reduced Jacket lamp VOLTAGE 120 240 347 Vertical LamQ VS Type V In 400w and below, luminaires are supplied with an acrylic sag lens. A glass sag lens is supplied with luminaires above 400w and with 26" luminaires. Medium base, 200w max on 14 units. QUAD 208 277 480 12a208/240/277, Factory tied to 277V. FINISH EH and H26 BLA Black Anodized BRA NA OC Bronze Anodized Natural Aluminum Anodized Optional Color Paint Specify RAL designation ex: OC- RAL7024 SC Special Color Paint Specify. Must supply color chip. ENT style BRP Bronze Paint BLP Black Paint OC Optional Color Paint Specify RAL designation ex: OC- RAL7024 SC Special Color Paint Specify. Must supply color chip. F LF PC PCR POLY HS QS XF SG MH PSMH HPS Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. ® Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001 -2007. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Genlyte Group WATTAGE 2 2@90 3 19: 19 100MH' 250MH 150MH' 400MH 175MH 200MH 250PSMH 250MH' 320PSMH' 350PSMH' 175PSMH' 400PSMH 450PSMH' 100HPS 150HPS' 250HPS 400HPS VOLTAGE CONFIGURATION Single Assembly Twin Assembly Twin Assembly at 90° Triple at 90° WATTAGE Metal Halide Pulse Start Metal Halide High Pressure Sodium • • ?ECEIv. I, Fusing In Head In- Line/In -Pole Fusing Photocontrol and Receptacle N/A with 480V. Photocontrol Receptacle only Polycarbonate Sag Lens In lieu of flat glass. N/A with 4X optics. 450w maximum. Internal Houseside Shield Supplied standard with FM optics. Quartz Standby Extended Flat Glass Lens Flat Glass lens with extended drop. Allows for the use of a larger lamp and still meet IES Full cutoff classification. Supplied standard with T19 units with 4X optics above 400w. Sag Glass Lens In lieu of flat glass Supplied standard with 26' VS 750PSMH' 1000MH 875PSMH 750PSMH' 750HPS 1000PSMH' OPTIONS CD MF MU UB AP AT PTF2 PTF3 PTF4 Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos, TX 78666 CO MMUNITY D CV CLur�lyfCNT 750HPS 1000HPS FINISH 3 @120 Triple at 120° 4 Quad Assembly Clear Drop Diffuser EH Style only Mast Arm Fitter 10° Uptilt Bracket Quick Disconnect for Ballast Tray Adjustable Knuckle - Pole Mount Only available with 1 way and 2 @ 180° mounting Adjustable Knuckle - Tenon Mount Fits 2 3/8' tenon. N/A with 14' units Pole Top Fitter - 2 3/8" - 3° Dia. Tenon Pole Top Fitter - 3° - 3 1/2° Dia. Tenon Pole Top Fitter - 3 1/2° - 4° Dia. Tenon (800) 227 -0758 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753 -7855 www.sitelig hting.com OPTIONS 3. Medium base lamp 4. Available with vertical lamp optics only. 5. Operates 55V lamp. 6. M149 only. Horizontal optics require MS750/PS,BU/HOR/B737 lamp. 7. Requires E2843T28 lamp. 8. Available with horizontal lamp optics only. - 647th - to LIGHTING LIGHTING 79115.43/0507 • FORM 10 SQUARE EH /H /HT ARM MOUNT SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL: Each Gardco Square Form 10 arm mount is a cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Units are designed with half -cube proportions. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain - tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassembly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging of the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. HOUSING: Extruded housings (EH style) are offered in 14" (35.56 cm) and 19" (48.26 cm) sizes and are composed of precisely mitered anodized aluminum extrusions. Fabricated (H style) units are available in 14" (35.56 cm), 19" (48.26 cm), T19" (48.26 cm) and 26" (66.04 cm) sizes and are one piece, multi- formed aluminum with an integral reinforcing spline and a single concealed joint. Pressure injected silicone provides a continuous weathertight seal at all miters and points of material transition. ARM: Extruded aluminum arm is prewired and secured to fixture by contractor. Assembly is suitable for mounting to pole without requiring access to luminaire. LENS: Mitered, extruded anodized aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. 26" VS Luminaires feature a sag glass lens. In 400w and below, Type VS luminaires are supplied with an acrylic sag lens. A glass sag lens is supplied with Type VS luminaires above 400w. Concealed stainless steel latch and hinge permit easy toolless access to the luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form 10 optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve IES Types I (1), III (3), IV (FM and 4X), and V (0 - horizontal lamp and VS - vertical lamp) distributions. The mogul lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell with lamp grip - all securely attached to the reflector assembly. 100MH units have medium base lampholder. All Metal Halide units in the 19" and 26" housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to - 20 °F / -29 °C. The ballast is mounted on a unitized tray and secured within the luminaire, above the reflector system. Component -to- component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 301 °F /150 °C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. FINISH: Extruded housings (EH style) are standard with natural, bronze, or black Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodized finish. Special color polyester finishes are available. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. O Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001 -2007. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Gentyte Group Formed housings (H style) are standard with a chromatic acid pretreatment and an epoxy undercoat. The finish coat is a thermosetting polyester baked at 450 °F /232 °C to achieve an H -2H hardness measure. 26" H style units are also offered with optional Architectural Class I anodized finish. LABELS: All luminaires bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet Location labels. FULL CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Full cutoff performance means a luminaire distribution where zero candela intensity occurs at an angle of 90° above nadir. Additionally, the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80° above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the luminaire. CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Cutoff performance means a luminaire distribution where the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 25 (2.5 percent) at an angle at or above 90° above nadir, and 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80° above nadir. This applies to at lateral angles around the luminaire. DIMENSIONS D 1.1 ft' 2.3 ft' 2.9 ft' .10 m' .21 m' .27 m' 2.1 ft' 4.0 ft' 5.5 ft' .20 m' .37 m' .51 m" 2.2 ft' 4.3 ft' 6.4 ft' .20 m' .40 m' .59 m' Size 14 19 T19 26 C C Size Width B t -2 way 3-4 way D EH14 14" 7' 6" 6" 5" H14 14" 7" 2" 6" 5" 35.56 cm 17.78 an 5.08 cm 15.24 an 12.70 an EH19 19" 10" 9" 9" 5° 4826 an 25.40 cm 22.86 an 22.86 an 12.70 an H19 19" 10" 2° 9" 5" 48.26 cm 25.40 cm 5.08 cm 22.88 cm 12.70 cm T19 19" 12" 2" 9" 5" 4826 cm 30.48 an 5.08 an 22.86 an 12.70 cm 26 26° 12" 12" 12" 8" 66.04 cm 30.48 cm 30.48 an 30.48 cm 20.32 cm Single C 35.56 cm 17.78 an 15.24 cm 15.24 em 12.70 cm EPA's Twin 3/4 3.5 ft' 7.0 ft' 8.9 ft' .33 m' .65 m' .83 m' Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos, TX 78666 • Width Approximate Weight Single Twin Quad 30 lbs 60 lbs 120 lbs 13.61 kg 27.22 kg 54.43 kg 55 lbs 24.95 kg 65 lbs 29.48 kg 95 lbs 43.09 kg 110 lbs 49.90 kg 130 lbs 58.97 kg 190 lbs 86.18 kg (800) 227 -0758 (512) 753 -1000 FAX: (512) 753 -7855 www.sitelighting.com 220 lbs 99.79 kg 260 lbs 117.93 kg 380 lbs 172.37 kg GARDCO LIGHTING 79115 - 43/0507 B • 100 LINE 101 PERFORMANCE SCONCE SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL: Each Gardco 101 luminaire is a wall mounted cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge or compact fluorescent lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed in a rain - tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant housing. The housing, back plate and door frame are diecast aluminum. A choice of three (3) optical systems is available. Luminaires are suitable for wet locations (damp locations if inverted). HOUSING: Single -piece soft trapezoidal housings are diecast aluminum. A memory retentive gasket seals the housing with the doorframe to exclude moisture, dust, insects and pollutants from the optical system. A black, diecast ribbed backplate dissipates heat for longer lamp and ballast life. DOOR FRAME: A single -piece diecast aluminum door frame integrates to the housing form. The door frame is hinged closed and secured to the housing with two (2) captive stainless steel fasteners. The heat and impact resistant 1/8" (.32cm) tempered glass lens and one -piece gasket are mechanically secured to the door frame with four (4) galvanized steel retainers. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: Reflectors are composed of specular extruded and faceted components, electropolished, anodized and sealed. Reflector segments are set in arc tube image duplicating patterns to achieve the wide throw, forward throw or medium throw downlight distributions. ELECTRICAL: Standard Luminaires: Each high power factor HID core and coil ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to - 20 °F / -29 °C. Component -to- component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150 °C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. Standard fluorescent units have a starting temperature of 0 °F / -18 °C. Standard fluorescent ballasts are high power factor electronic solid state. A Genlyte Company 16 1/4' 41.28 cm 9 22.86 cm Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. Solite is a Registered Trademark of AFG Industries. C Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001 -2006. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. • EM and EMC Luminaires: In the event of power interruption, integral battery pack will power (1) 42W or (2) 26W compact fluorescent lamps at reduced light levels for a minimum of 90 minutes. Maintenance free battery is rated for ambient temperatures down to 32 °F /0 °C (EM) or 0 °F / -18 °C (EMC). Indicator light is visible through the lens. A test switch is accessible through the door assembly. EM and EMC units do not bear CUL label. EMR Luminaires: A 7.5'/2.29m, 12 wire, quick disconnect assembly is provided for wiring through conduit (by others) to a Bodine B30, B84CG or B94C -CAN fluorescent emergency battery pack. The fluorescent emergency battery pack MUST be supplied by Gardco. The B30, B84CG or B94C -CAN option is required to be on the order to the factory. In the event of power interruption, the B30 remote battery pack will power (1) 42W or (2) 26W compact fluorescent lamps at full light levels; the remote battery pack (B84CG or B94C -CAN) will power (1) 42W or (1) 26W compact fluorescent lamp at reduced light levels; for a minimum of 90 minutes (B30 or B84CG) or 30 minutes (B94C -CAN). Maintenance free battery is rated for ambient temperatures down to 32 °F /0 °C. Minimum luminaire starting temperature is 0 °F / -18 °C. Indicator light is visible through the lens. A test switch is accessible through the door assembly. NOTE: B30 and B84CG do not bear CUL label. LAMPHOLDER: Pulse rated medium base sockets are glazed porcelain with nickel plated screw shell. Fluorescent sockets are high temperature PBT with brass contacts. FINISH: Each standard color luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, triglycidal isocyanurate (TGIC) textured polyester powdercoat finish. Standard colors include bronze (BRP), black (BLP), white (WP), natural aluminum (NP) and beige (BGP). Consult factory for specs on custom colors. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL or CUL (where applicable) labels, except as noted. Lens down application is Wet Location and lens up is Damp Location, except when using the optional inverted Wet Location components. DIMENSIONS Note: Mounting plate center is located in the center of the luminaire width and 3.5 "(8.89cm) above the luminaire bottom (lens down position). Splices must be made in the J -box (by others). Mounting plate must be secured by max. 5/16' (.79cm) diameter bolts (by others) structurally to the wall. Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos, TX 78666 Mounting Plate IE— 4 5/16• — O 1 0.95 cm o�- / \ T 1 3/4' dia. I 3' 4.4 cm 7.62 cm 0 Mounting Bolt Pattern (800) 227 -0758 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753 -7855 www.sitelighting.com GARDCO LIGHTING 79115 - 124/0706 Fluorescent 2260F Fa WT MI 120 208 240 an .247 4$0 a?, .: • • _ ',:. , • • • 42TRF 100MH . _ • • ._ , . , • •.•`_; .. a voltage; Eli 50MH 7GV zoo g,t t L// 341 413M • 347 80 • • 70MH • • • • 42TRF 100MH • • • • • • 150MH • • • • • 1 :0' 1 175MH • • • • • • 35HPS • 50HPS • f,• '. :.,t . • 70HPS • • • • • • 100HPS • • • • • • 150HPS • • • • • , 9 50CMHE' UNIV 70CMHE' UNIV ` 100CMHE' UNIV m: •.a,-:'• Fluorescent 260F' ' .1:. •; 'r.( t 7". 1 k:a....^ . UNIV • ;•;; 226QF' UNIV • F , 32TRF' UNIV • 42TRF' UNIV • 232TRF' UNIV • 242TRF' UNIV _ • FINISH • OPTI • Fluorescent 226QF a WI MI 120 208 240 2n 347 80 • • • • 42TRF • • • • 242TRF '- ` - _... • • ;i f;?':: • • Notes: Job: Type: The Gardco 101 Trapezoidal Wedge high performance sconce offers an excellent alternative to unsightly wall mounted fixtures. These architecturally refined luminaires are designed to integrate naturally to wall surfaces. The 101 luminaires are available with three (3) different distribution patterns - a wide throw, a medium throw and a forward throw. Each luminaire is designed to accept HID sources up to 175MH, and Compact Fluorescent sources up to 42 watt. Housings are sealed throughout, completely excluding moisture, dust, insects and contaminants. ORDERING 101 Luminaires installed in the normal downlight position with no uptilt meet IESNA Full Cutoff criteria PREFIX 101 101 EM 101 EMC 101 EMR ..AMPNOLTAGE CHART - 101 BRP BLP WP NP BGP OC 100 LINE 101 PERFORMANCE SCONCE PREFIX Bronze Paint Black Paint White Paint Natural Aluminum Paint Beige Paint Optional Color Paint Specify RAL designation ax: OC- RAL7024 SC Special Color Paint Specify. Must supply color chip A Gen lyte Company DISTRIBUTION Trapezoidal Wedge Emergency Sconce Emergency Sconce Cold Temperature Remote Emergency Sconce F PCB OS 0924 012V SL UT WATTAGE Refer to confiiguratlon chart below for available combinations FT WT MT Fusing 120V through 277V only Button Type Photocontrol n/a w/480V Quartz Standby HID only, N/A with CMHE Ballasts or in 480V. 100w Quartz maximum. Quartz Emergency WT Optic only 150w HID maximum. 100w Quartz maximum Quartz 12V Emergency WT Optic only 150w HID maximum. 100w Quartz maximum Solite® Diffusing Lens 5° Uptilt Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. Solite is a Registered Trademark of AFG Industries. 0 Copyright Gardco Lighting 2001 -2006. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. VOLTAGE F F Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are valid. Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. DISTRIBUTION CONFIGURATION CHART - 101 EMR Distribution FINISH Forward Throw Not Available with Fluorescent Lamps Wide Throw Not Available with Fluorescent Lamps Medium Throw WATTAGE AND VOLTAGE CONFIGURATION CHART - 101EM or 101EMC Distribution Voltage Voltage Combinations marked with a dot are available for ordering. MH - Metal Halide CMHE - Ceramic Metal Halide with Electronic Ballast HPS - High Pressure Sodium OF - Quad Fluorescent TRF - Triple Tube Fluorescent 'Emergency Battery Packs for EMR types MUST be ordered with luminaires and supplied by Gardco. Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos, TX 78666 (800) 227 -0758 (512) 753 -1000 FAX: (512) 753 -7855 www.sitelighting.com OPTIONS 1. Fluorescent and CMHE luminaires feature electronic ballasts that accept 120V through 27714 50hz to 260hz. input Specify 'UNIV - voltage for 120V through 27714 NS WLU Wet Location Door for Inverted Mount N/A with WG option WS Wall Mounted Box for Surface Conduit Rear entry permitted WS/UT WS Option w /5° Uptilt Rear entry permitted WG Wire Guard Not available with WLU option POLY Polycarbonate Sag Lens 1(10w HID maximum EMR Luminaires Only; B30* Bodine Remote Emergency Pack Full Light Output in emergency mode B84CG' Bodine Emergency Battery Pack B94C -CAW Bodine Remote Emergency Pack - Canada GARDCO LIGHTING 79115 - 124/706 IFAB Rainfall.. Considerations for Roof Drains Flat roof drainage is accomplished through a system of roof drains, vertical leaders, and horizontal storm drains sized and located in accordance with established criteria in conformance with local plumbing and building codes. Therefore, when considering the design of a roof drainage system, it is recommended that local code authorities be consulted regarding the rainfall rate acceptable in their jurisdiction for design purposes. National rainfall rate information is provided in the chart below, listing rainfall rates in inches per hour for selected cities. On the next page, is an isopluvial (equal or similar rainfall line) map based on data for a storm of one hour duration and a 100 year return period from the National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C. When the rainfall rate for the locale of the project has been resolved, sizing of the roof drains, leaders and horizontal drainage piping can proceed. Rainfall Rates for Selected Cities (inches per hour) Based on a storm of one hour duration and a 100 year return period. Source: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC. ALABAMA Birmingham Huntsville Mobile Montgomery ALASKA Fairbanks Juneau ARIZONA Flagstaff Nogales Phoenix Yuma ARKANSAS Fort Smith Little Rock. Texarkana CALIFORNIA Barstow Crescent City Fresno Los Angeles Needles Sacramento San Diego San Francisco COLORADO Denver 3.8 3.6 4.6 4.2 1.0 0.6 2.4 3.1 2.5 1.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 1.4 1.5 1.1 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.5 2.4 Durango 1.8 Grand Junction 1.7 Pueblo 2.5 CONNECTICUT Hartford 2.7 New Haven 2.8 DELAWARE Georgetown 3.0 Wilmington 3.1 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Washington 3.2 FLORIDA Jacksonville 4.3 Key West. 4.3 Miami 4.7 Pensacola 4.6 Tampa 4.5 GEORGIA Atlanta 3.7 Macon 3.9 Savannah 4.3 Thomasville 4.3 HAWAII Hilo 6.2 Honolulu 3.0 IDAHO Boise 0.9 Pocatello 1.2 ILLINOIS Cairo 3.3 Chicago 3.0 Peoria 3.1 Springfield 3.3 INDIANA Evansville 3.2 Fort Wayne 2.9 Indianapolis 3.1 South Bend 3.0 Terre Haute 3.2 IOWA Burlington 3.3 Davenport 3.3 Des Moines 3.5 Dubuque 3.3 Sioux City 3.6 KANSAS Atwood 3.3 Dodge City 3.4 Topeka 3.7 Wichita 3.7 KENTUCKY Ashland 3.0 Bowling Green 3.2 Lexington 3.1 Louisville 3.2 Middlesboro 2.8 Paducah 3.3 LOUISIANA Baton Rouge 4.8 Lake Charles 4.7 New Orleans 4.8 Shreveport 3.9 MAINE Bangor 2.2 Caribou 2.0 Portland 2.4 MARYLAND Baltimore 3.2 Hagerstown 2.8 Salisbury 3.1 MASSACHUSETTS Boston 2.5 New Bedford 2.6 Pittsfield 2.8 Springfield 2.7 MICHIGAN Alpena 2.5 Detroit 2.8 Escabana 2.4 Grand Rapids 2.8 Lansing 2.8 Marquette 2.4 Sault Ste. Marie 2.2 MISSISSIPPI Biloxi 4.7 Columbus 3.9 Jackson 4.0 Natchez 4.4 MISSOURI Columbia Kansas City St. Louis Springfield MONTANA Billings 1.9 Havre 1.6 Helena 1.5 Missoula 1.3 NEBRASKA Grand Island 3.5 Omaha 3.8 Sidney 3.2 Valentine 3.2 NEVADA Carson City 1.1 Elko 1.0 Las Vegas 1.5 NEW HAMPSHIRE Berlin 2.5 Claremont 2.5 Portsmouth 2.4 NEW JERSEY Atlantic City 3.0 Newark 3.1 Trenton 3.1 NEW MEXICO Albuquerque 2.0 Hobbs 3.0 Las Cruces 2.0 Santa Fe 2.0 NEW YORK Albany 2.6 Binghamton 2.3 Buffalo 2.3New York 3.0 Syracuse 2.3 Watertown 2.2 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.4 NORTH CAROLINA Asheville, 4.1 Charlotte 3.7 Greensboro 3.5 Raleigh 3.7 Wilmington 4.2 NORTH DAKOTA Bismarck 2.8 Fargo 3.2 Grand Forks 3.0 Williston 2.6 OHIO Cincinnati 3.0 Cleveland 2.8 Columbus 2.8 Toledo 2.8 Youngstown 2.7 Zanesville 2.8 OKLAHOMA Oklahoma City 3.8 Tulsa 3.8 OREGON Medford 1.4 Pendleton 1.0 Portland 1.3 PENNSYLVANIA Erie 2.6 Harrisburg 2.8 Philadelphia 3.1 Pittsburgh 2.6 Scranton 2.7 Williamsport 2.6 RHODE ISLAND Providence 2.6 SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston 4.3 Columbia 4.0 Greenville 4.2 SOUTH DAKOTA Aberdeen 3.3 Pierre 3.2 Rapid -City 2.9 Sioux Falls 3.6 TENNESSEE Chattanooga 3.5 Knoxville 3.2 Memphis 3.7 Nashville 3.3 TEXAS Abilene 3.6 Amarillo 3.5 Brownsville 4.5 Corpus Christi 4.5 Dallas 4.0 El Paso 2.4 Houston 4.6 Lubbock 3.3 Odessa 3.2 San Antonio 4.2 Tyler 3.9 UTAH Cedar City 1.6 Salt Lake City 1.3 VERMONT Brattleboro 2.5 Burlington 2.2 VIRGINIA Bristol 2.7 Charlottesville 2.9 Norfolk 3.4 Richmond 3.3 Roanoke 3.2 WASHINGTON Bellingham 1.1 Seattle 1.1 Spokane 1.0 Yakima 1.0 WEST VIRGINIA Charleston 2.8 Elkins 2.7 Parkersburg 2.8 WISCONSIN Ashland 2.5 Eau Claire 3.0 Green Bay 2.5 La Crosse 3.1 Madison 3.0 Milwaukee 3.0 WYOMING Casper 1.9 Cheyenne 2.2 Rock Springs 1.3 Sheridan 1.7 Yellowstone Park 1.4 VERTICAL LEADER SIZE Roof Area RAINFALL INCHES CAPACITY (GPM) Roof Area Roof Area Roof Area (Square Feet) Roof Area Roof Area PER HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 >- 2 30 2880 1440 960 720 575 480 3 92 8800 4400 2930 2200 1760 1470 4 192 18400 9200 6130 4600 3680 3070 6 563 11600 2700 17995 13500 10800 9000 8 1208 116000 58000 38660 29000 23200 19315 As a first step in the sizing procedure it will be necessary to determine the quantity and placement of the drains required for the roof. Even though there are a number of opinions regarding roof areas that can be effectively drained by one drain, it is recognized that for minimized ponding with adequate drainage, two roof drains are required for roof areas of 10,000 square feet or less, and at least one drain is required per 10,000 square feet of area for larger roofs. Individual judgement will be necessary when considering quantity and placement of drains on roofs where shape and size of sections may require departure from the 10,000 square feet per drain recommendation. In the replacement of drains, uniform distribution is desirable for proper roof drainage. Locating drains within 50 feet of the roof perimeter and no more than 100 feet apart is acceptable practice. Also, careful consideration of roof structural members, dividers, expansion joints, and other projections including rooftop equipment is essential in planning the roof drainage system for adequate drainage of each area of the roof. Consultation with the architect and structural engineer regarding roof details is recommended. RAINFALL CONVERSION: INCHES PER HOUR TO GPM For sizing purposes, rainfall -which is expressed in inches per hour, (in the following calculation) - is converted to gallons per minute per square foot of Sizin g. of MIFAB Roof roof area. A one (1) inch per hour rainfall converts to .0104 GPM per square foot. For any given rainfall, multiply the inches per hour by .0104 to arrive at the GPM per square foot of roof area. Then multiply that figure by the square feet of roof area to be drained to arrive at the total gallons per minute to be handled by the drainage system. For example: consider a 4 -inch per hour rainfall on a 10,000 square foot roof: 0.0104x4x 10,000 = 416 GPM • CHARTS A AND B As an aid to the sizing and placement of MIFAB roof drains, please refer to Charts A and B, which give leader and horizontal storm drain capacities at various slopes, with capacities in GPM and maximum projected roof areas in square feet in each case. It will be noted that a 6 -inch leader, thus 6 -inch drain, will be indicated by the preceding example. The horizontal storm drain required, depending on slope, would be 6 or 8 inch. However, remembering that two drains are recommended for areas of 10,000 square feet or less, it would be advisable to select smaller drains with total capacity of 416 GPM or more. The maximum projected roof areas in Charts A and B are based on the flow capacity of each pipe size shown. The total of the projected flows from the vertical leaders will determine the size and slope of the horizontal storm sewer required in chart B. CHART A: VERTICAL LEADER CAPACITY IN GPM WITH MAXIMUM SERVICEABLE ROOF AREA IN SQUARE FEET BASED ON VARIOUS ANTICIPATED HOURLY RAINFALL RATES Sizing and Placement, of MIFAB Roof. Drains CHART B: HORIZONTAL STORM DRAIN CAPACITY IN GPM FOR SLOPES GIVEN WITH MAXIMUM SERVICEABLE ROOF AREA IN SQUARE FEET BASED ON SYSTEM CAPACITY Roof Drain Sizing - Example A warehouse is being built in a geographical area where the maximum hourly rainfall (See Page RD- 6) is 2.8 inches per hour. The building will be 200'x400' and have a flat roof with no appreciable vertical surfaces. CALCUATIONS: • Total area to be drained (200 x 400) 80,000 Sq. ft. • Number of drains required 8 (From sizing rule, one drain per 10,000 sq. Ft.) • Rainfall conversion from in. per hour to GPM 2330 (0.0104 x 2.8 x 80,000) • Expected flow from drain 292 (GPM_ number of drains) (2330 =8) • Size of leader (from Chart A) 6 Inch vertical • Size of horizontal storm sewers (from Chart B 1/4/ foot slope, combined flow of vertical leaders) 8,10,12,15 Inches Roof Drainage System Layout indicated by the sizing example 400' 100' 100' Roof Drain Sizing: Other Considerations • OVERFLOW DRAINAGE Overflow scuppers and drains, as essential components of the roof drainage system, are employed to prevent potentially damaging overloading of roof structures. They must be installed in conformance with local codes. Generally, scuppers are installed in adjacent parapet walls no more than 5 inches above the low point of the roof at a ratio of at least one scupper per 20,000 sq. ft. of roof area. Overflow drains of the same size as the roof drains having above roof inlet elevation as specified by code, connected to drain lines independent from the roof drains, may be installed in lieu of scuppers. • VERTICAL WALLS Finally, vertical walls that project above and permit storm water to drain on the roof area to be drained must be considered when planning the roof drainage system. An acceptable rule to follow in sizing roof drains, leaders, and horizontal drainage piping is to add one half of the area of any vertical wall that diverts rainwater to the roof to the projected area of that roof. By multiplying the area thus obtained by the GPM /sq. ft. conversion of inches per hour rainfall, the new total GPM discharge requirement is determined for the roof. 1/8 INCH PER FOOT SLOPE 1/4 INCH PER FOOT SLOPE 1/2 INCH PER DRAIN CAPACITY (GPM) FOOT SLOPE MAXIMUM ROOF AREA (SQUARE FEET) DRAIN PIPE SIZE (INCHES) DRAIN CAPACITY (GPM) MAXIMUM ROOF AREA (SQUARE FEET) DRAIN CAPACITY (GPM) MAXIMUM ROOF AREA (SQUARE FEET) 3 34 822 48 1160 69 1644 4 78 1880 110 2650 157 3760 5 139 3340 197 4720 278 6680 6 223 5350 315 7550 446 10700 8 479 11500 679 16300 958 23000 10 863 20700 1217 29200 1725 14100 12 1388 33300 1958 47000 2775 66600 15 2479 59500 3500 84000 4958 11900 Sizing and Placement, of MIFAB Roof. Drains CHART B: HORIZONTAL STORM DRAIN CAPACITY IN GPM FOR SLOPES GIVEN WITH MAXIMUM SERVICEABLE ROOF AREA IN SQUARE FEET BASED ON SYSTEM CAPACITY Roof Drain Sizing - Example A warehouse is being built in a geographical area where the maximum hourly rainfall (See Page RD- 6) is 2.8 inches per hour. The building will be 200'x400' and have a flat roof with no appreciable vertical surfaces. CALCUATIONS: • Total area to be drained (200 x 400) 80,000 Sq. ft. • Number of drains required 8 (From sizing rule, one drain per 10,000 sq. Ft.) • Rainfall conversion from in. per hour to GPM 2330 (0.0104 x 2.8 x 80,000) • Expected flow from drain 292 (GPM_ number of drains) (2330 =8) • Size of leader (from Chart A) 6 Inch vertical • Size of horizontal storm sewers (from Chart B 1/4/ foot slope, combined flow of vertical leaders) 8,10,12,15 Inches Roof Drainage System Layout indicated by the sizing example 400' 100' 100' Roof Drain Sizing: Other Considerations • OVERFLOW DRAINAGE Overflow scuppers and drains, as essential components of the roof drainage system, are employed to prevent potentially damaging overloading of roof structures. They must be installed in conformance with local codes. Generally, scuppers are installed in adjacent parapet walls no more than 5 inches above the low point of the roof at a ratio of at least one scupper per 20,000 sq. ft. of roof area. Overflow drains of the same size as the roof drains having above roof inlet elevation as specified by code, connected to drain lines independent from the roof drains, may be installed in lieu of scuppers. • VERTICAL WALLS Finally, vertical walls that project above and permit storm water to drain on the roof area to be drained must be considered when planning the roof drainage system. An acceptable rule to follow in sizing roof drains, leaders, and horizontal drainage piping is to add one half of the area of any vertical wall that diverts rainwater to the roof to the projected area of that roof. By multiplying the area thus obtained by the GPM /sq. ft. conversion of inches per hour rainfall, the new total GPM discharge requirement is determined for the roof. DESIGN OF ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ROOF DRAINAGE The roof is one of the most essential parts of a building as it protects occupants, contents, and interior of the structure from the elements. Once an architect has determined the kind of roof he intends to use, he must give equal attention to the design of the roof drainage system. Factors to be considered in the design of roof drainage systems are the area to be drained, size of gutters, downspouts, outlets, slope of roof, type of building, and appearance. ROOF AREA TO BE CONSIDERED CHAPTA1 - ROOF DRAINAGE SYSIOIAS The design capacity for a roof drainage system depends on the quantity of water to be handled. The quantity of water in turn depends on the roof area, slope, and rainfall intensity. In considering the roof area, it must be remembered that rain does not necessarily fall vertically and that maximum conditions exist only when rain falls perpendicular to a surface. Since the roof area would increase as its pitch increases, then it would not be advisable to use the plan area of a pitched roof in the calculation of a drainage system. Experience has taught that use of the true area of a pitched roof often leads to oversizing of gutters, downspouts, and drains. To determine the design area for a pitched roof, Table 1 -1 is used. TABLE 1 -1 DESIGN AREAS FOR PITCHED ROOFS PITCH in. /ft. Level to 3 4 to 5 6 to 8 9 to 11 12 To determine the design area multiply the plan area by the factor in B column These areas are then divided by the proper factor given in Table 1 -2, thus obtaining the required area in square inches(square mm) for each downspout. From Table 1 -3 select the downspout. mm/mm 76/305 102- 127/305 152- 203/305 229 - 279/305 305/305 *8 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.20 1.30 Architectural Sheet Metal Manual - 5th Ed. RAINFALL INTENSITY — DOWNSPOUT CAPACITY Rainfall intensity is usually given in inches per hour for a five minute duration or one hour duration based on U.S. Weather Bureau records. Table 1 -2 based on records through 1978, gives five minute intensities for selected cities. New Orleans, Los Angeles, for example, may have 8 in. /hr.(203 mm/hr) for a five minute duration yet record only 4.8 in. (121 mm) in an hour over a 100 year period. These rates correspond to 0.133 in. /min.(3.4 mm/min.) and 0.08 in. /min.(2 mm /min.). Local codes may require that drainage systems only be designed for the latter. It takes 96.15 square feet(8.93 square meters) of surface with 1 inch per hour(25 mm /hr) of water to correspond with 1 gpm (0.063 Ifs) flow rate. Downspouts and gutters are sized in relation to rainfall on this basis. Plumbing codes typically use the vertically projected roof area for drainage design and they often use a square foot allowance per square inch of downspout for 1 in. /hr.(25 mm /hr) rainfall that varies with diameter, for example, 3 in.(76 mm): 911(85); 4 in.(102 mm): 1100 (102); 5 in.(127 mm): 1280 (119); 6 in.(152 mm): 1400 (130) and 8 in.(203 mm): 1750 (163) sq. ft.(sq. m). Net drainage capacity from using Table 1 -1 and 1 -2 should be compared with local code requirements. DOWNSPOUT SIZING In sizing downspouts, the following considerations apply: 1. Downspouts of less than 7.00 sq in.(4515 sq mm) cross section should not be used except for small areas such as porches and canopies. 2. The size of the downspout should be constant throughout its length. 3. Downspouts should be constructed with conductor heads every 40 ft(12.2 m) to admit air and prevent vacuum. 4. Offset of more than 10 ft(3.0 m) can affect drainage capacity. 5. The gutter outlet capacity should suit the downspout capacity. 6. The downspout size must suit the bottom width of the gutter. 1.1 m A STORMS WHICH SHOULD BE EXCEEDED ONLY ONCE IN 10 YEARS B STORMS WHICH SHOULD BE EXCEEDED ONLY ONCE IN 100 YEARS Intensity lasting 5 minutes Calculated roof area drained per downspout area Intensity lasting 5 minutes Calculated roof area drained per downspout area in/hr mm/hr sq ft/ sq in sq mn/ 100 sq mm in/hr mm/hr sq ft/ sq in sq m/ 100 sq mm MISSOURI: Kansas City 7.4 187 160 2.30 10.4 265 110 1.70 ' Saint Louis 7.1 181 170 2.40 9.9 251 120 1.70 MONTANA: Helena 1.8 46 660 9.50 3.1 77 390 5.70 Missoula 1.8 46 660 9.50 2.4 61 500 7.20 NEBRASKA: Omaha 7.4 188 160 2.30 10.5 267 110 1.60 NEVADA: Reno 2.3 57 530 7.60 4.5 114 270 3.90 Las Vegas 2.1 53 570 8.3 5.2 133 230 3.30 NEW JERSEY: Trenton 6.7 170 180 2.60 9.3 236 130 1.90 NEW MEXICO: Albuquerque 4.0 102 300 4.30 6.7 171 180 2.60 Santa Fe 4.5 115 270 3.80 6.4 169 180 2.60 NEW YORK: Albany 6.5 165 190 2.70 9.1 232 130 1.90 Buffalo 6.0 152 200 2.90 8.4 213 140 2.10 New York City 6.7 169 180 2.60 9.2 235 130 1.90 NORTH CAROLINA: Raleigh 7.3 185 160 2.40 9.8 250 120 1.80 NORTH DAKOTA: Bismark 6.6 167 180 2.60 9.8 250 120 1.80 OHIO: Cincinnati 6.8 172 180 2.50 9.3 236 130 1.90 Cleveland 6.3 160 190 2.70 8.8 223 140 2.00 OKLAHOMA: Oklahoma City 7.6 193 160 2.30 10.5 267 110 1.60 OREGON: Baker 2.2 56 550 7.90 3.8 97 310 4.50 Portland 2.1 53 570 8.30 3.0 76 400 5.80 PENNSYLVANIA: Philadelphia 6.8 172 180 2.60 9.4 238 130 1.80 Pittsburgh 6.4 163 190 2.70 8.8 224 140 2.00 RHODE ISLAND: Providence 5.6 143 210 3.10 7.8 198 150 2.20 SOUTH CAROLINA: Charleston 7.2 184 170 2.40 9.4 238 130 1.80 TENNESSEE: Memphis 7.4 187 160 2.30 10.0 253 120 1.70 Knoxville 6.7 169 180 2.60 9.0 229 130 1.90 TEXAS: Fort Worth 7.6 193. 193 160 10.5 267 110 1.60 Dallas 7.6 194 160 2.30 10.5 267 110 1.60 Houston 8.2 208 150 2.10 10.8 274 110 1.60 San Antonio 7.6 193 160 2.30 10.5 267 110 1.60 UTAH: Provo 3.0 75 410 5.80 5.2 131 230 3.30 Salt Lake City 2.8 71 430 6.20 4.3 108 280 4.10 VIRGINIA: Norfolk 7.1 181 170 2.40 9.5 242 130 1.80 WASHINGTON: Seattle 2.1 53 570 8.30 3.3 84 360 5.20 Spokane 2.1 53 570 8.30 3.5 90 340 4.90 WEST VIRGINIA: Parkersburg 6.6 168 180 2.60 9.1 230 130 1.90 WISCONSIN: Madison 6.8 172 180 2.50 9.5 241 130 1.80 Milwaukee 6.6 168 180 2.60 9.1 232 130 1.90 WYOMING: Cheyenne 5.7 146 210 3.00 9.9 252 120 1.70 1 These intensities am based on records and statistical projections. They may occasionally be exceeded either in the general area or at small areas within the designated city. Architectural Sheet Metal Manual - 5th Ed. 1.3 1935 4155 6513 10832 "A" = area of 1/4 in.(6.4 mm) undersized inlet See Figures 1 -31 and 1 -32 for gage 7. Assuming that using the fewest number of downspouts is desirable, their locations will be affected by a. gutter capacity and length. To limit the effects of thermal expansion in gutters 50 ft(15.3 m) is a practical maximum length of gutter to be served by a downspout. Unless special provisions are made for flexibility in downspouts, gutters and their support systems, gutters should expand away from downspouts and downspouts should not be located near gutter expansion joints. See expansion coefficients in Appendix A -1 and expansion allowances in Figures 1 -5 to 1 -10. b. the capacity of the inlet tube. See Table 1 -3 and Figure 1 -33•. Also, a sharp bend at the inlet may clog. c. potential for water freezing in downspouts and gutters. Open, partially open or corrugated styles downspouts are suggested for areas subject to icing. Locating downspouts on the north side of buildings is not recommended for such areas. d. the appearance of the downspout system and a potential need for concealment. See Figures 1- 31 and 1 -32. e. the greater capacity of a pitched gutter. f. the downspout discharge location. Water disposal at this location should be acceptable. SeA Figures 1 -31 and 1 -36. g. the risk of gutter overflow from insufficient drainage capacity. See Figures 1 -4, 1 -21, and 1- 23. 1.4 TABLE 1 -3 DIMENSIONS OF STANDARD DOWNSPOUTS TYPE Plain Round Corrugated Round Plain Rectangular Rectangular Corrugated AREA sq.in. 7.07 12.57 19.63 28.27 50.24 sq.mm. 4560 810 12661 18234 32404 5.94 11.04 17.72 25.97 3831 7120 11429 16750 3.94 6.00 12.00 20.00 24.00 2541 3870 7740 12900 15480 3.80 7.73 11.70 18.75 2451 4985 7621 12213 Size sq.in 5.94 11.04 17.71 25.95 47.15 sq.mm. 3831 7120 11422 16737 30411 3.00 4.80 10.31 15.75 21.56 1935 3096 6649 10158 13906 3.00 6.38 10.00 16.63 Nominal Size in. mm. 3 76 4 102 5 127 6 152 8 203 3 76 4 102 5 127 6 152 2 51 3 76 4 102 5 127 6 152 2 51 3 76 4 102 5 127 Actual in. 3 4 5 6 8 mm. 76 102 127 152 203 3 4 5 6 76 102 127 152 1.75x2.25 2x3 3x4 3.75x4.75 4x6 44x57 51 x76 76x102 95x121 102x152 1.75x2.25 2.370.25 2.75x4.25 3.75x5 44x57 60x83 70x108 95x127 h. a scupper serving a designated roof area. See Figures 1 -26 to 1 -30. After the number and location of downspouts have been determined, the areas to be drained by each downspout should be figured. In making this calculation for a pitched roof, the plan area should be adjusted according to recommendations given on Table 1 -1. SAMPLE PROBLEM: Select downspouts for a building in Boston, Mass. The building is 100 x 85 ft.(30.5 x 26 m) with a double pitched roof having a slope of 6 in. /ft.(152 mm /m). The slope is toward the 100 ft.(30.5 m) side. Maximum rainfall conditions will be used to determine downspout size. It is decided to drain the building with 4 downspouts located at each corner of the building. An expansion joint will be installed in each gutter between the downspouts. The plan area of this building is 8500 sq ft.(790 sq m). Since the slope is 6 in. /ft.(152 mm /m), factor 1.10 is used (Table 1 -1), making the design area 9350 sq ft.(868 sq m). Thus each of the four downspouts will serve a 2338 sq ft.(217 sq m) area. From column B, Table 1 -2, opposite Boston, it is found that 1 sq in.(645 sq mm) of downspout will drain 170 sq ft.(16 sq m) of roof area. Divide 2338(217) by 170(16) to determine that each downspout should have a minimum area of 13.56 sq in.(8746 sq mm). Architectural Sheet Metal Manual - 5th Fri l egarnomEGag REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WELLS -FARGO TOC ANNEX TUKWILA, WASHINGTON APRIL 17, 2007 FOR CRAFT ARCHITECTS, INC. REC ED Technology APRIL 17, 2007 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WELLS -FARGO TOC ANNEX TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR CRAFT ARCHITECTS, INC. File No. 5246- 008L00/ • • Geotechnical Engineering Services File No. 5206- 008 -00 April 17, 2007 Prepared for: Craft Architects, Inc. Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Kathryn Craft, Principal i Prepared by: i GeoEngineers, Inc. ' 1101 South Fawcett Avenue, Suite 200 Tacoma, Washington 98402 (253) 383 -4940 i D. Craig R er Geotechnical Engineer GeoEngineers, Inc. 4 Garry H. Squires, PE, LG, LEG Principal ' DCR:GHS:tt TACO:\5 5206008 \00\Finals\520600800R.doc Copyright® 2007 by GeoEngineers, Inc. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. i I EXPIRES 10123/ I File No. 5206- 008 -00 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 1 I PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 GEOLOGY REVIEW 2 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 I SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 I GENERAL 3 FOUNDATION SUPPORT 3 General 3 I Spread Footings 4 Settlement 4 FLOOR SLABS 4 I CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS 5 Drainage 5 Design Parameters 5 I SITE DEVELOPMENT AND EARTHWORK 6 General 6 Stripping and Clearing 6 I Subgrade Preparation 6 Preload and Surcharge Fill 7 Temporary Excavation Support, Fill Slopes and Groundwater Handling 7 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes 7 I Surface Drainage 8 Erosion Control 8 FILL MATERIALS 8 1 General 8 Pipe Bedding 8 Trench Backfill 9 I Use of On -Site Soil as Fill 9 FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION 9 General 9 I Area Fills and Bases 9 Trench Backfill 9 SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 10 I General 10 Seismic Design Criteria 10 Liquefaction Potential 10 U I File No. 5206- 008 -00 Page i GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2007 1 s • TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 11 General • 1 Design Assumptions 11 LIMITATIONS 12 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan 111 Figure 3. Settlement Plate Detail APPENDICES APPENDIX A — SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING Appendix A Figures Figure A -1. Key to Exploration Logs Figures A -2 and A -3. Log of Borings Figures A-4 and A -5. CPT Logs Figure A-6. Sieve Analysis Results Figure A -7. Atterberg Limits Test Results APPENDIX B — REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE I 1 I 1 I 1 ' File No 5206- 008 -00 Page tl GEOENGINEER� April 17, 2007 • • ' REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 1 WELLS -FARGO TOC ANNEX TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR ' CRAFT ARCHITECTS, INC. 111 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Wells -Fargo TOC Annex building. The project site is located southwest of the intersection of South 180th Street and Sperry Drive in Tukwila, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING An existing Wells -Fargo building is located between the Green River and Sperry Drive on the south side of 180th Street in Tukwila. The proposed TOC Annex will be located to the north of the existing building 111 in a grass pasture that fronts on South 180th Street. We understand the TOC Annex will be a single -story structure of approximately 13,500 square feet, with ' an on -grade concrete floor slab, concrete walls, and concrete roof. The new annex building will contain a concrete vault approximately 52 feet long, 24.5 feet wide and 9.5 feet high, with 9 -inch thick walls and a steel door. Structural loads are expected to be relatively high for a single -story structure. Based on the total weight of the structure, we calculate an average ground pressure of about 535 pounds per square foot (psf), over the building footprint. We understand column loads are on the order of 225 kips, and strip footing loads are approximately 3 kips per linear foot. The proposed improvements will include a covered truck parking area, the TOC Annex building, an additional paved parking area and a new stormwater detention pond that will be located to the east of the new building. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of our services is to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions as a basis for developing design criteria for geotechnical aspects of the proposed project. Our specific scope of services for this ' project included the following: 1. Review readily available published geologic data for existing information on soil and ' groundwater conditions in the project vicinity. 2. Locate and coordinate clearance of existing public utilities, by contacting the "One -Call Underground Utility Locate Service" prior to beginning explorations. A private locator was also ' utilized to check for private utilities on site. 3. Explore soil and groundwater conditions at the site by drilling one hollow -stem auger boring to a depth of 40 feet in the building area and one boring to a depth of about 10 feet in the proposed parking area using a subcontracted rubber -tired drill rig. We supplemented the information from the borings with two Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) probes that were extended to a depth of 1 50 feet below grade. 4. Perform laboratory tests on selected soil samples obtained from the borings to evaluate pertinent engineering characteristics. The laboratory test program consisted of moisture content determinations, Atterberg Limit tests and grain -size analyses. ' File No. 5206- 008 -00 Page 1 GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2006 • • 5. Provide a discussion of the subsurface conditions encountered. 6. Provide recommendations for shallow foundations, including allowable soil bearing pressures, 1 settlement (total and differential) estimates, lateral earth pressures and coefficient of friction for evaluating sliding resistance. ' 7. Provide recommendations for support of on -grade floor slabs, including capillary break, vapor retarder, underslab drainage, and modulus of subgrade reaction, as appropriate. 8. Provide recommendations for site preparation and earthwork, including clearing and stripping, ' and temporary and permanent cut slopes. We also discuss suitability of on -site soils for use as structural fill, constraints for wet weather construction, specifications for imported soil for use as structural fill, and fill placement and compaction requirements. 9. Provide recommendations for site drainage and control of groundwater. 10. Evaluate potential for consolidation - related settlement of structures and provide recommendations to reduce post - construction settlement by preloading the site. 11. Discuss seismic considerations, including seismic design criteria consistent with the 2006 International Building Code (IBC) and our opinion of the liquefaction potential of site soils. ' 12. Provide recommendations for asphalt concrete pavement (ACP) design, including base and subbase requirements for the proposed parking areas. We provide typical minimum ACP section ' recommendations based on our experience. 13. Comment on anticipated construction difficulties identified from the results of our site studies. GEOLOGY REVIEW The geologic information we reviewed for the project vicinity includes the Geologic Map King County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Investigation, scale 1:100,000 (Derek B. Booth, et.al.), May 2006, which maps the soil underlying the project area as alluvium (soil unit Qal). Alluvium typically consists of moderately well sorted deposits of cobbles, gravel, sand and fine- grained soils such as silt and clay. Alluvium may also include some lake deposits and marine alluvium. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is located in a commercially developed area of Tukwila, Washington, and is bounded by the Green River to the west, South 180th Street to the north, Sperry Drive to the east, and the existing Wells - Fargo building to the south. Site grades are generally level, except along the west boundary where there is an earth berm adjacent to the Green River. The site is currently a grass - landscaped lawn area. We ' observed some concrete debris in the project area at the time of our site visit. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS We explored subsurface conditions at the site on March 13 and 19, 2007, by drilling two borings on the site. Two CPT soundings were also conducted on the site on March 12, 2007, to a depth of 50 feet below ' ground surface (bgs). The approximate locations of the CPT soundings and the soil borings are shown on Figure 2 — Site Plan. Details of our subsurface exploration program and summary exploration logs are included in Appendix A. 1 ' File No. 5206- 008 -00 Page 2 CiEOENGINEER� April 17, 2007 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GENERAL FOUNDATION SUPPORT General File No. 5206- 008 -00 April 17, 2007 Page 3 We encountered alluvial soil deposits in our explorations as anticipated. In boring 1, we encountered 3 inches of sod at the surface, underlain by silty sand in a loose to very loose, moist condition that extends to about 6.5 feet bgs. We then encountered interbedded layers of very soft or loose silt, sandy silt, silty sand and organic silt with peat inclusions to a depth of 26.5 feet. From 26.5 feet to the boring termination depth, we encountered sand with silt that ranges from loose to medium dense. The CPT soundings generally correlate quite well with the soil borings. However, the probes indicate that the sand with silt layer encountered at depth is typically in a medium dense to very dense condition. We encountered groundwater in both soil borings. Depth to groundwater during exploration was about 10 feet bgs at the location of boring 1, and about 8 feet bgs in boring 2. We expect depth to groundwater will vary seasonally, generally being higher during the winter and spring months. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our review and subsurface exploration program, it is our opinion that the proposed improvements can be constructed generally as envisioned with regard to geotechnical considerations. The site is underlain by compressible soils, which will consolidate under the building loads. Settlement will likely occur on the order of 3.5 to 4.5 inches. As a result, preloading and a surcharge is recommended. A summary of the primary geotechnical considerations is provided below. The summary is presented for introductory purposes only and should be used in conjunction with the complete recommendations presented in this report. • Surficial duff, sod and organic -rich material should be stripped from all areas to be improved. • We recommend the site be preloaded and surcharged to reduce the potential for unacceptable post- construction settlement. • Because of the potential for settlement resulting from consolidation of portions of the alluvium, filling to establish proposed grades should be completed at least one month before starting foundation excavations. This would include both the preload and surcharge fill material. • The site soil is not suitable for direct support of spread footings or floor slabs and it will be necessary to support these structural elements on imported structural fill. • The site soil is highly moisture sensitive and will be difficult to work or compact when wet, or if earthwork is performed in wet weather. Additional importation of select structural fill to replace wet on -site soil should be anticipated if earthwork is performed during wet weather. Because of the soft sediments at shallow depth and the potential for differential settlement with respect to the existing structure we recommend the building addition area be preloaded and surcharged prior to foundation construction. In our opinion, the proposed structure can be satisfactorily founded on continuous wall or isolated column footings supported on structural fill after completing a preload and GEOENGINEERIO 1 • • surcharge program. If subgrade soils are loose or disturbed they must be compacted to a dense, unyielding condition or removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. Spread Footings ' The proposed building can be supported on continuous wall or isolated column footings underlain by at least 3 feet of imported structural fill. Overexcavation will be required where there is less than 3 feet of imported structural fill below foundation grade. We recommend the overexcavation extend beyond the footing perimeter for a horizontal distance equal to the depth of the excavation. Footing excavations r should be performed using a smooth -edged bucket to limit bearing surface disturbance. Loose or disturbed materials in footing excavations should be removed or recompacted. The exterior footings should be established at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. The recommended minimum footing depth is greater than the anticipated frost depth. Interior footings can be founded a minimum of 12 inches below the top of the floor slab. It may be appropriate to protect prepared and approved footing excavations if they are to remain open in wet weather. , Foundation bearing surfaces should not be exposed to standing water. Water that accumulates in footing excavations should be removed and the bearing surface reevaluated before placing ' reinforcing steel or foundation concrete. We understand that structural loads will be on the order of 225 kips for columns and 3 kips per foot for ' perimeter walls, approximately 90 percent of which is dead plus long term live load. Isolated column and continuous wall footings should have minimum widths of 5 feet and 18 inches, respectively. We recommend that footings founded as recommended be proportioned using a maximum allowable soil ' bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). This bearing pressure applies to the total of dead and long -term live loads and may be increased by one -third when considering total loads, including earthquake or wind loads. This is a net bearing pressure. The weight of the footing and overlying backfill can be ignored in calculating footing sizes. Settlement ' Provided the building area is preloaded and surcharged as recommended herein, we estimate that settlements of footings designed and constructed as recommended should be less than 1 inch, for the anticipated loading conditions. Differential settlements between comparably loaded isolated column ' footings or along 50 feet of continuous footing should be less than 1/2 inch. Settlements could be larger than estimated if footings are placed on loose or disturbed bearing material, or designed under the minimum recommendations. FLOOR SLABS A modulus of subgrade reaction of 300 pounds per cubic inch (pci) can be used for designing the building floor slab provided that the subgrade consists of structural fill and has been prepared in accordance with the "Site Development and Earthwork" section of this report. We recommend the floor slabs be underlain by at least 18 inches of imported select fill, consisting of well - graded sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines by weight, based on the minus 3/4 inch fraction. Settlements for the floor slab designed and constructed as recommended are estimated to be less than 1 inch. We estimate that differential settlement of the floor slabs will be 1/2 inch or less over a span of 50 feet providing that the fill below the slab is compacted as specified, and the preload/surcharge is completed as recommended herein. 1 ' File No. 5206- 008 -00 Page 4 GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2007 If dry slabs are required (e.g., where adhesives are used to anchor carpet or tile to the slab), a waterproof liner may be placed as a vapor barrier below the slab. CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS ' Drainage Positive drainage is imperative behind any retaining structure. This can be accomplished by using a ' drainage zone of free draining material behind the wall with perforated pipes to discharge the collected water. The drainage material should consist of coarse sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines based on the fraction of material passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. The wall drainage zone should extend horizontally at least 18 inches from the back of the wall. A perforated smooth - walled rigid PVC pipe having a minimum diameter of 4 inches should be placed at the bottom of the drainage zone along the entire length of the wall, with the pipe invert at or below the 1 elevation of the base of the wall footing. The drainpipes should discharge to a tightline leading to an appropriate collection and disposal system. An adequate number of cleanouts should be incorporated into the design of the drains in order to provide access for regular maintenance. Roof downspouts, perimeter drains or other types of drainage systems should not be connected to retaining wall drain systems. Design Parameters ' The pressures presented assume that backfill placed within 2 feet of the wall is compacted by hand - operated equipment to a density of 90 percent of the MDD and that wall drainage measures are included ' as previously recommended. For walls constructed as described above, we recommend using an active lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for the level backfill condition. For walls with backfill sloping upward behind the wall at 2H:1V ' (horizontal:vertical), an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf should be used. This assumes that the tops of the walls are not structurally restrained and are free to rotate. The above values are for walls that retain native soil. For the at -rest condition, equivalent a fluid density of 55 pcf should be used for native soil. ' The recommended pressures do not include the effects of surcharges from surface loads. Appropriate factors of safety should be applied to these values with respect to bearing capacity, sliding and overturning. If vehicles will be operated to within one -half the height of the wall, a traffic surcharge should be added to the wall pressure. The traffic surcharge can be approximated by the equivalent weight of an additional 2 feet of backfill behind the wall. ' Retaining walls founded on structural fill may be designed using the allowable soil bearing values and lateral resistance values presented above in the "Shallow Foundation Support" section of this report. We ' estimate settlement of retaining structures should be similar to the values previously presented for building foundations, provided preloading and surcharging is performed as discussed above. The table below summarizes our recommended design parameters 1 1 ' File Na 5206- 008 -00 Page 5 GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2007 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND EARTHWORK General Stripping and Clearing Subgrade Preparation File No. 5206- 008 -00 April 17, 2007 Recommended Design Parameters Active Earth Pressure (Ka) = 35 pcf At -Rest Earth Pressure (K0) = 55 pcf Passive Earth Pressure for Design (F.S. = 1.5) = 270 pcf Coefficient of Friction for Design (ES. = 1.5) = 0.40 We anticipate that site development work will include clearing and stripping, placing fill to establish design grades, excavating for utility trenches, preloading and surcharging the building area, and placing and compacting excavated or backfill materials. We expect that the majority of site grading can be accomplished with conventional earthmoving equipment. The following sections provide recommendations for earthwork, site development and fill materials. The sod and organic -rich soil should be stripped and removed from proposed pavement and structural areas. Stripped material should be transported off site for disposal or processed and used in landscaping areas. Required stripping depths should be evaluated based on observations during the stripping operation. We estimate stripping depths could be on the order of 6 inches to remove the surficial organic material. Greater stripping depths may be required to remove localized zones of loose or organic soil and tree roots near the western edge of the project area. Additional stripping may be required if subgrades become disturbed during stripping operations. We recommend compacting the exposed soil to a uniformly firm and unyielding condition prior to placement of fill. We recommend that prepared subgrades be observed by a member of our firm, prior to placement of fill, including the preload and surcharge fill discussed below. Our representative will evaluate the suitability of the subgrade and identify areas of yielding, which are indicative of soft or loose soil. The exposed subgrade soil should be proof - rolled with heavy rubber -tired equipment and/or probed with a 1/2- inch -steel rod, as necessary. If soft or otherwise unsuitable areas are revealed during proof - rolling or probing that cannot be compacted to a stable and uniformly firm condition, we recommend that: 1) the subgrade soils be scarified (e.g., with a ripper or farmer's disc), aerated and recompacted; or 2) the unsuitable soils be removed and replaced with structural fill, as needed. Soils encountered in the explorations contain a significant percentage of fines. This material may be sensitive to small changes in moisture content. Site soil may be difficult, if not impossible, to work and compact when wet or if construction occurs during wet weather conditions. Soil with high fines content is susceptible to disturbance from construction traffic when wet or if earthwork is performed during wet weather. Page 6 GEOENGINEERY/9 ' Preload and Surcharge Fill We recommend that a minimum of 3.5 feet of temporary surcharge fill be placed in the building area. The surcharge fill height should be measured relatively to finish floor elevation and should be increased to 4 feet in the areas of the isolated column footings and below the vault area. The preload/surcharge area should include the entire building footprint and extend 5 feet beyond the outside edge of footings; then slope down at the angle of repose. The preload must not be placed within 5 feet of the existing building because of the potential for inducing settlement beneath the existing buildings footings. ' Settlement of the preload fill should be monitored at several locations. This can be accomplished by setting settlement plates in the fill (see Figure 3) and taking survey elevation readings referenced to a benchmark well away from the surcharge fill. We recommend that the surcharge fill be left in place until ' most of the settlement has occurred. Based on our experience, we estimate this could take approximately 3 to 4 weeks. We are available to review settlement data and recommend when the surcharge can be removed. Temporary Excavation Support, Fill Slopes and Groundwater Handling ' Excavations deeper than 4 feet should be shored or laid back at a stable slope if workers are required to enter. Shoring and temporary slope inclinations must conform to the provisions of Title 296 Washington Administrative Code (WAC), Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." Regardless of the soil type ' encountered in the excavation, shoring, trench boxes or sloped sidewalls will be required under Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA). The contract documents should specify that the contractor is responsible for selecting excavation and dewatering methods, monitoring the excavations for safety and providing shoring, as required, to protect personnel and structures. In general, temporary cut slopes should be inclined no steeper than about 1.5H:1V. This guideline assumes that all surface loads are kept at a minimum distance of at least one half the depth of the cut ' away from the top of the slope and that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter cut slopes will be necessary where significant seepage occurs or if large voids are created during excavation. Some sloughing and raveling of the cut slopes should be expected. Temporary covering with heavy ' plastic sheeting should be used to protect slopes during periods of wet weather. Groundwater was encountered in the borings completed for this study. Some perched groundwater may ' also occur in the near- surface soil depending on the time of year of construction. We anticipate that the groundwater handling needs will generally be lower during the late summer and early fall months. We anticipate that perched groundwater encountered in shallow footing or trench excavations can be handled ' adequately with sumps, pumps, and/or diversion ditches, as necessary. Temporary dewatering will be necessary for deeper excavations. Ultimately, we recommend that the contractor performing the work be made responsible for controlling and collecting groundwater encountered. Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes ' Based on our review of the plan documents, we do not expect that permanent cut and fill slopes will be necessary. However, if plans change and they become a part of the construction, we recommend that permanent cut and fill slopes be constructed at a maximum inclination of 21-1:1V. Where 2H:1 V ' permanent slopes are not feasible, retaining structures should be considered. Cut areas should be re- vegetated as soon as practical to reduce the surface erosion and sloughing. We recommend that fill slopes be overbuilt slightly and subsequently cut back to expose well compacted fill in order to achieve uniform compaction. Temporary erosion protection should be used until permanent protection is established. ' File No. 5206- 008 -00 Page 7 GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2007 • • Surface Drainage Surface water from roofs, driveways and landscape areas should be collected and controlled. Curbs or other appropriate measures such as sloping pavements, sidewalks and landscape areas should be used to direct surface flow away from the buildings and erosion sensitive areas. Roof and catchment drains should discharge to an appropriate collection system. ' Erosion Control ' Based on existing site grades and the proposed development, we anticipate that erosion control measures such as silt fences, straw bales and sand bags will generally be adequate for the proposed development. However, if construction and grading is staged, slopes may be created and additional erosion control i measures may have to be implemented. Temporary erosion control should be provided during construction activities and until permanent erosion control measures are functional. Surface water runoff should be properly contained and channeled using drainage ditches, berms, swales, and tightlines and should not discharge onto sloped areas. Any disturbed sloped areas should be protected with a temporary covering until new vegetation can take effect. Jute or coconut fiber matting, excelsior matting or clear plastic sheeting is suitable for this purpose. Graded or disturbed slopes should be tracked in -place with the equipment running perpendicular to the slope contours so that the track grouser marks provide a texture to help resist erosion. ' Permanent measures for erosion control should include reseeding or replanting the disturbed areas as soon as possible and protecting those areas until new vegetation has been established. Permanent site grading should be accomplished in such a manner that stormwater runoff is not concentrated and surface water is ' not directed to sloped portions or into excavated areas of the site. This can be accomplished by grading to direct the flow to appropriate collection points away from the slopes or excavations. FILL MATERIALS General Material used for fill should be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. The workability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture ' content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve. If construction is performed during wet weather ' conditions, we recommend using fill consisting of well - graded sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines by weight based on the minus 3/4 -inch fraction. If prolonged dry weather prevails during the earthwork phase of construction, a somewhat higher fines content may be acceptable. ' Pipe Bedding Trench backfill for the bedding and pipe zone should consist of well- graded granular material with a maximum particle size of 3/4 inch and less than 5 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve. The material should be free of roots, debris, organic matter and other deleterious material. File No. 5206 - 008 -00 Page 8 GEOENGINEERSO April 17, 2007 II • • I Trench Bacldill We recommend that all trench backfill consist of material of approximately the same quality as "gravel I borrow" described in Section 9- 03.14(1) of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), 2006 Standard Specifications. All fills should be constructed in horizontal lifts at the appropriate thickness for compaction. For compaction recommendations refer to the "Fill Placement and I Compaction" section of this report. Use of On -Site Soil as Fill I Based on our subsurface explorations, it is our opinion that inorganic mineral native sand, sand with silt and silty sand on the site may be considered for use as structural fill, provided they can be placed and I compacted as recommended. The silt and sandy silt are not suitable for use as structural fill. The majority of the native materials have a high fines content, which may make it difficult or impossible to compact them during periods of extended wet weather. I FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION I General Structural fill should be compacted at a moisture content near optimum. The optimum moisture content varies with the soil gradation and should be evaluated during construction. Silty soil and other fine I granular soil such as silt, sandy silt, silty sand, and sand with silt may be difficult or impossible to compact during persistent wet conditions. I Fill and backfill material should be placed in uniform, horizontal lifts, and uniformly densified with vibratory compaction equipment. The maximum lift thickness will vary depending on the material and compaction equipment used, but should generally not exceed 10 to 12 inches in loose thickness. I Area Fills and Bases I Structural fill placed to raise site grades and aggregate base materials under foundations, slabs and pavements should be placed on a prepared subgrade that consists of uniformly firm and unyielding inorganic native soils or compacted fill. Structural fill (including the preload) should be compacted to at I least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD) determined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 1557 (modified Proctor). Surcharge fill will not remain below proposed structures and so it does not need to be compacted as structural fill. However, the surcharge I may need to be compacted in order to meet the unit weight requirement described in the "Foundation Support" section of this report. I Trench Back fill For utility excavations, we recommend that the initial lift of fill over the pipe be thick enough to reduce the potential for damage during compaction but generally should not be greater than about 18 inches. In I addition, rock fragments greater than about 1 inch in maximum dimension should be excluded from this lift. I In building areas, trench backfill should be uniformly compacted in horizontal lifts to at least 95 percent of the MDD (ASTM D 1557). Fill placed below a depth of 2 feet in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD (ASTM D 1557). In nonstructural areas, trench backfill should be I I File No. 5206 - 008 -00 Page 9 GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2007 • • compacted to a firm condition to allow mobilization of construction equipment. Suitable native soils or select granular soils should be acceptable in non - structural areas. SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS General The site is located within the Puget Sound region, which is seismically active. Seismicity in this region is attributed primarily to the interaction between the Pacific, Juan de Fuca, and North American plates. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting beneath the North American plate. It is thought that the resulting deformation and breakup of the Juan de Fuca plate might account for the deep focus earthquakes in the region. Hundreds of earthquakes have been recorded in the Puget Sound area. In recent history, four of these earthquakes were large events: 1) in 1946, a Richter magnitude 7.2 earthquake occurred in the Vancouver Island, British Columbia area; 2) in 1949, a Richter magnitude 7.1 earthquake occurred in the Olympia area, 3) in 1965, a Richter magnitude 6.5 earthquake occurred between Seattle and Tacoma, and 4) on February 28, 2001, a magnitude 6.8 occurred at Nisqually near Olympia. Research is currently underway regarding historical large magnitude subduction- related earthquake activity along the Washington and Oregon coasts. Geologists are reporting evidence that suggests several large magnitude earthquakes (Richter magnitude 8 to 9) have occurred in the last 1,500 years, the most recent of which occurred about 300 years ago. No earthquakes of this magnitude have been documented during the recorded history of the Pacific Northwest. Seismic Design Criteria Seismic design for the building area may be performed using the equivalent static force procedure outlined in the 2006 IBC using the parameters provided below. Liquefaction Potential File No. 5206 -008 -00 April 17, 2007 Seismic Design Parameters 2006 IBC Spectral Response Accel. at Short Periods (Ss) = 1.39 Spectral Response Accel. at 1 Second Periods (S = 0.48 Site Class = D Site Coefficient (F = 0.9 Site Coefficient (F = 2.4 Liquefaction refers to a condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from earthquake forces, results in development of excess pore pressures in saturated soils and subsequent loss of strength in the deposit of soil so affected. In general, soils that are susceptible to liquefaction include loose to medium dense "clean" to silty sands that are below the water table. We evaluated liquefaction potential at the site using conventional methods based on SPT values converted from our field data. Based on empirical correlations it is our opinion that portions of the sand and silty sand could liquefy, most likely in isolated and discontinuous zones. We anticipate liquefaction would result in settlement at ground surface due to the depth of the overburden overlying the liquefiable soils. We estimate that total and differential settlements on the order of 2.5 to 3 inches could occur across the Page 10 GEOENGINEERij I site due to liquefaction. We recommend that the structure be designed to withstand this level of differential settlement without catastrophic collapse. I ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS I General Pavement subgrades and structural fill should be prepared and placed as previously described. The crushed rock base course should be moisture conditioned near the optimum moisture content and I compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD determined in accordance with ASTM D 1577 test procedures. An appropriate number of in -place density testing should be conducted on the compacted base course to check that adequate compaction has been obtained. Crushed rock base course should I conform to applicable sections of 4 -04 and 9- 03.9(3) of the WSDOT, 2006 Standard Specifications. Design Assumptions I The pavement sections described below must be supported on a subgrade that comprises recompacted native soil overlain by a layer of imported select fill. We recommend a minimum select fill thickness of I 18 inches in the truck loading and unloading area, and 12 inches in the vehicle parking areas. Subbase fill must be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD determined in accordance with ASTM D 1577 test procedures. Subgrades below the subbase fill must be firm and unyielding. Hot mix asphaltic concrete I should conform to applicable sections of 5 -04, 9 -02 and 9 -03 of the WSDOT 2006 Standard Specifications. I The recommended pavement sections assume that final improvements surrounding the pavement will be designed and constructed such that stormwater or excess irrigation water from landscape areas does not infiltrate below the pavement section into the crushed base or subbase fill. I Asphaltic Concrete Pavement (Automobile Parking Areas) • Surfacing: 2 inches of hot mix asphalt, class 1/2 inch, PG 58 -22. I • • Base: 4 inches of crushed surfacing base course. Subbase: 12 inches of select granular fill placed as previously recommended. • Subgrade: Recompacted native soil. Asphaltic Concrete Pavement (Truck Loading / Unloading Area) • Surfacing: 3 inches of hot mix asphalt, class 1/2 inch, PG 58 -22. I • Base: 6 inches of crushed surfacing base course. • Subbase: 18 inches of select granular fill placed as previously recommended. I • Subgrade: Recompacted native soil. The recommended pavement sections may not be adequate for heavy construction traffic conditions such I loads imposed by concrete transit mixers, dump trucks, or crane loads. Additional pavement thickness may be necessary to prevent pavement damage during construction, and/or repair of damaged pavements should be anticipated. 1 I I File No. 5206 -008 -00 Page 11 GEOENGINEERS Apri117, 2007 • LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use by Craft Architects, Inc. and their authorized agents for ' the Wells -Fargo TOC Annex project located at South 180th Street and Sperry Drive in Tukwila, Washington. ' Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Please refer to the Appendix B titled "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" for additional information pertaining to use of this report. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 File No. 5206 - 008 -00 April .17, 2007 Page 12 GEOENGINEERSO U U O S•166th St S•168th•St S•170th•St S•172nd•St S`175th•St S•182nd•St S 200th•St Snohomish . Strander Blvd m a S 194th•SI ` t I9ttitas Treck•Dr Oaken Jefferson S•188th St S -190th •St S•196th.St S•27th•S r S•182nd•St— a— S484th •St— LS. 86th•Pl `— S•188th St •5•190th•St to - S•192nd•St Renton SW4 3F y Mt SW 30th•S S•196th St S•19Bth•St— l S•199th-St S•200th St co a S•187th•St- 0 0 N .c Cr) al V S•187th•Pt- Pacific Lewis CaNdz r man' Yakima Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. 3. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. Data Sources: Interstates, state routes, and roads from TIGER 2000. County boundaries, cities, and waterbodies from Department of Ecology. USGS topo map provided by TerraServer (DRG- Scale4m). Lambert Conformal Conic, Washington State Plane North, North American Datum 1983 2,000 0 Feet 2,000 Vicinity Map Wells -Fargo TOC Annex Tukwila, Washington GEOENGINEERS l� Figure 1 0 r 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED TRUCK LOADING /UNLOADING AREA CPT -2A Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. can not guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference: Drawing provided by ? ?? Legend B -1-- Boring number and approximate location CPT -1 A Cone Penetrometer Test number and approximate location hErala EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED DETENTION POND ACPT-1 Site Plan Wells -Fargo TOC Annex Tukwila, Washington Figure 2 \ \ \ l /. B -2+ \ 7 / \ z S. 180TH STREET PROPOSED TO ANNEX BUILDING Coupling welded to plate Existing Ground Surface Sand Pad if necessary NOTES: Settlement Plate, 16 "x16 "x1 /4" Not to Scale Measurement Rod, 1/2" diameter pipe or rebar Casing, 2" diameter pipe (set on plate, not fastened) . iJ�JJJJJJJJJJ� !J�!.IJJJ.IJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ No' i`v \ 1. Install markers on firm ground or on sand pads if needed for stability. Take initial reading on top of rod and at adjacent ground level prior to placement of any fill. 2. For ease in handling, rod and casing are usually installed in 5 -foot sections. As fill progresses, couplings are used to install additional lengths. Continuity is maintained by reading the top of the measurement rod, then immediately adding the new section and reading the top of the added rod. Both readings are recorded. 3. Record the elevation of the top of the measurement rod in each marker at the recommended time intervals. Each time, note the elevation of the adjacent fill surface. 4. Read the marker to the nearest 0.01 foot, or 0.005 foot if possible. Note the fill elevation to the nearest 0.01 foot. 5. The elevations should be referenced to a temporary benchmark located on stable ground at least 100 feet from the embankment. GEOENGINEERS SETTLEMENT PLATE DETAIL FIGURE 3 APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING • APPENDIX A SUBURFACE EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS We explored subsurface conditions at the site on March 13 and 19, 2007, by drilling two borings on the site. Two CPT soundings were also conducted on the site on March 12, 2007, to a depth of 50 feet bgs. Our representative located the explorations in the field by hand - taping and pacing from existing site features such as buildings and roadways. Exploration locations should be considered approximate and are indicated on the Site Plan, Figure 2. A key to the symbols used on the boring logs is included as Figure A -1. The boring logs are included as Figures A -2 and A -3. The CPT logs are included as Figures A -4 and A -5. SOIL BORINGS The test borings were advanced by Holocene Drilling, using a truck- mounted hollow -stem auger drill rig under subcontract to GeoEngineers. The soil borings were advanced to a depth of 41.5 feet (boring 1), and 11.5 feet (boring 2), below existing site grade. Soil samples were obtained from the borings using a standard split -spoon sampler driven into the soil using a 140 -pound hammer, free - falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches or other indicated distance is recorded on the logs as the blow count. Our representative continuously monitored the borings, and maintained a log of the subsurface conditions at 2.5 -foot and 5 -foot depth intervals. The soils encountered were visually classified in accordance with the system described in Figure A -1, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 2488. CPT SOUNDINGS ' The CPT soundings were advanced by Northwest Cone Explorations Inc. under subcontract to GeoEngineers, Inc. The CPT soundings were each advanced to a depth of 50 feet below existing site ' grade. The electric CPT sounding involves pushing an instrumented steel probe into the ground and continuously recording soil friction, tip resistance and dynamic pore pressure. No soil samples are obtained during CPT soundings. Soil types are interpreted based on empirical relationships between measured CPT parameters described above. The CPT method generally provides more detailed information on soil layering than conventional drilling and sampling methods. LABORATORY TESTING General Soil samples obtained from the boring were transported to GeoEngineers laboratory. Representative soil samples were selected for laboratory tests to evaluate the pertinent geotechnical engineering characteristics of the site soils and to confirm our field classification. The following paragraphs provide a description of the tests performed. ' Moisture Content The moisture content of selected samples was determined in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D 2216. The test results are used to aid in soil classification and correlation with other pertinent ' engineering soil properties, and are presented on the boring logs. ' File No. 5206 -008 -00 Page A -I GEOENGINEERS� April 17, 2007 • Sieve Analysis Laboratory testing included grain -size analysis conducted in general accordance with ASTM C 136. The grain -size analysis results are shown in Figure A -6. ATTERBERG LIMITS The Atterberg is used to classify the soil as well as to aid in evaluating index properties and consolidation characteristics of the fine- grained soil deposits. The liquid limit and the plastic limit were obtained in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. Atterberg limit tests were completed on two soil samples, one in each of the two borings conducted on site. The selected samples chosen for the Atterberg Limits test were from a silt layer encountered at an approximate depth of 10 feet bgs. Testing on the sample from boring 2 revealed the silt at that location was non - plastic. The results of the test conducted on the sample from boring I are summarized in Figure A -7. 1 1 1 1 1 ' File No. 5206- 008 -00 Page A - GEOENGINEER� April 17, 2007 MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO. 200 SIEVE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS M ORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. • SIEVE CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO MSS) � v 0 C\10 R / n GW WELLGRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES 0 O 0 O . 0 0 GP POORLY- GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES GRAVELS WITH FINES UPPRECUB UN LE ANOINT OF FINES) Topsoil/ Forest Duff /Sod GM SILTY GRAVELS. GRAVEL•SAND - SILT MIXTURES ; :' GC CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SAND• CLAY MIXTURES SAND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING NO.. SIEVE CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO RNES) � SW WELL- GRADED SANDS. SAND- GRAVEL MIXTURES S P POORLYGRADED S SAN MIXTURES SANDS VNTH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) SM SILTY SANDS. SAND - SILT MIXTURES SC SC CLAYEY SANDS. SAND -CLAY FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSING NO. 700 SIEVE SILTS LIQUID LIMIT AND CLAYS LESS THAN 50 ML INORGANIC SILTS. ROCK FLOUR, CLAYEY SILTS PATH SLIGHT PLASTICITY ``L INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY. GRAVELLY curs, SANDY curs. SILTY CLAYS. LEAN CLAYS MAA�� OL ORGANIC GA SILTY GU YS SILTS OF AND OR L PLAST ITY SILTS LIOUID LIMIT AND GREATER THAN 50 CLAYS I I I I MH INORGANIC SILTS MICAC DIATOMACEOUS SILTY SOILS EOUS OR / / CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY OH OR GANI C CU AN MEDIUM TO HIGH PS PLASTICTY D SILTS OF HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ri i N B PT PEAT. HUMUS. SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER -m-- . CC Cement Concrete AC Asphalt Concrete : �;: CR Crushed Rock/ Quarry Spalls TS Topsoil/ Forest Duff /Sod 1 1 1 1 1 • • • LI 11 II SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART NOTE: Multiple symbols are used to indicate borderline or dual soil classifications Sampler Symbol Descriptions 2.4 -inch I.D. split barrel Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Shelby tube Piston Direct -Push Bulk or grab Blowcount is recorded for driven samplers as the number of blows required to advance sampler 12 inches (or distance noted). See exploration log for hammer weight and drop. A "P" indicates sampler pushed using the weight of the drill rig. Graphic Loq Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units / Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit Material Description Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit %F AL CA CP CS DS HA MC MD OC PM PP SA TX UC VS NS SS MS HS NT ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SYMBOLS Measured groundwater level in exploration, well, or piezometer • Groundwater observed at time of exploration - Perched water observed at time of exploration • Measured free product in well or piezometer Laboratory / Field Tests Percent fines Atterberg limits Chemical analysis Laboratory compaction test Consolidation test Direct shear Hydrometer analysis Moisture content Moisture content and dry density Organic content Permeability or hydraulic conductivity Pocket penetrometer Sieve analysis Triaxial compression Unconfined compression Vane shear Sheen Classification No Visible Sheen Slight Sheen Moderate Sheen Heavy Sheen Not Tested NOTE: The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text and the logs of explorations for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. Descriptions on the logs apply only at the specific exploration locations and at the time the explorations were made; they are not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS GEOENGINEERS (// FIGURE A -1 Date(s) Drilled 03/19/07 Logged D LOG OF BORING 1 GHS , Drilling Contractor Holocene Drilling Method Rotary Auger ry g Samplin Methods SPT Auger Data 4.25 -inch ID Hollow -Stem Continuous Flight Hammer Data 140 lb hammer /30 in drop Drilling Equipment B-65 Truck - Mounted Total Depth (ft) 41 Surface Elevation (ft) Groundwater Level (ft. bgs) 10 Vertical Datum Datum/ System Easting(x): Northing(y): • t I LOG OF BORING 1 GEOENGINEER� Project: Wells Fargo TOC Annex Project Location: Tukwila, Washington j g Project Number: 5206 - 008 -00 Figure A -2 Sheet 1 of 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 0 n I- D ci w 0 0 U, J Z LL 0 0 o 0 EE O co a) w O. a) 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 j 12 118 118 118 118 To a) C 118 118 118 1 18 0 0 N 0 m 6 2 1 2 2 2 7 11 31 E a) CO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 U L f • O) CD J d O >' (7 SOD SM ML ML SM OUPT SP -SM MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 13 inches sod - Brown silty fine sand, trace organics (loose, moist) Brown silty fine sand (very loose, moist) - Brown to orange mottled silt with fine to medium sand - (very soft, wet) Brown -gray sandy silt (very soft, wet) Dark gray silty fine to medium sand (very loose, wet) - Gray organic silt with peat inclusions (very soft, wet) - - Black fine to medium sand with silt (loose, wet) - 53 36 90 27 CD .0 C t D 0 � OTHER TESTS AND NOTES AL SA MC SA SAMPLES Note: See Figure A -1 for explanation of symbols. • Date(s) Drilled 03/13/07 . Logged By DCR ecked GHS 1 Drilling Contractor Holocene Drilling Method Rota Au ry er g Sampling Methods SPT Auger Data 4.25 -inch ID Hollow -Stem Continuous Flight Hammer Data 140 lb hammer /30 in drop Drilling Equipment B -65 Truck- Mounted Total Depth (ft) 11.5 Surface Elevation (ft) Groundwater Level (ft bgs) 8 Vertical Datum Datum/ System Eastiing(x): Northing(y): 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t- o 0 C7 w a. 0 S °o S co LL O 0 o N 9 a 0 z a 0 I- C • 0 14 4 5 1 14 3 10 --I 18 1 15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 40 — SAMPLES 0 N O E ar rn rn 2 3 m a) J Zu g O O E 0 co SOD \2 inches sod 7 SM - Dark brown silty fine to medium sand (loose, moist) Grades to very loose ML - Brown sandy silt (very soft, wet) Note: See Figure A -1 for explanation of symbols. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION OTHER TESTS c .c AND NOTES O 5 20 o • LOG OF BORING 2 G EO E N G I N E E R _ Project: Wells Fargo TOC Annex Project Location: Tukwila, Washington Figure A-3 Project Number: 5206 - 008 -00 Sheet 1 of 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t- o 0 C7 w a. 0 S °o S co LL O 0 o N 9 a 0 z a 0 I- C • 0 14 4 5 1 14 3 10 --I 18 1 15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 40 — SAMPLES 0 N O E ar rn rn 2 3 m a) J Zu g O O E 0 co SOD \2 inches sod 7 SM - Dark brown silty fine to medium sand (loose, moist) Grades to very loose ML - Brown sandy silt (very soft, wet) Note: See Figure A -1 for explanation of symbols. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION OTHER TESTS c .c AND NOTES O 5 20 o • U U lY U 3 U, � 0 0 co 0 0 0 co 0 N U, Q 'o CO 0 0 fo 0 N 0 a Tip Resistance Qc TSF 0 0 5 10 15 20 Depth 25 (ft) 30 35 40 45 50 + - 1 _J_ J__ - -C Not to Scale r r Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC - 1993 200 0 Friction Ratio Fs/Qc ( %) 1- L _ 1 — r� r I _ - _ y _ Maximum Depth = 50.03 feet Ik 1 sensitive fine grained ® 4 silty clay to clay ® 2 organic material 0 5 clayey silt to silty clay 3 clay ® 6 sandy silt to clayey silt Pore Pressure "5`o l Behavior Type* SPT ■* Pw PSI Zone: UBC-1983 60% Hammer 6 -10 35 0 12 0 40 —I J I J J -- T - 1 - `.-I-I- _L11J - r 1- 4- Ti -I L11 J_ 1 -I - Northwest Cone Exploration 7 silty sand to sandy silt 'd 8 sand to silty sand 9 sand Depth Increment = 0.164 feet 151 I J_ LJ_L1J- 1 J LLJ_L1J— r r 1 r T t -I — + -I — _ L1 J_ 1 - r T 10 gravelly sand to sand 0 11 very stiff fine grained (1 F 12 sand to clayey sand (1 CPT -1 Wells -Fargo TOC Annex Tukwila, Washington GEOEFIGINEERY; Figure A-4 > - 0 N 0 0 Q CD U I co o 0 0 o co 0 N N a 0 0 Co 0 0 co 0 N U, U, 0 0 1 ,11 Behavior Type` Zone: UBC-1983 35 0 12 0 5 35 50 0 40 — 45 — Tip Resistance Qc TSF Not to Scale -r- 1 1 1 I i 1 1 C� Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC -1983 200 0 Friction Ratio Fs /Qc ( %) —1- - J- 1 _ 1 _ sre - -1 -+— J_ 1_L_ - _L- - 1 - Maximum Depth = 50.03 feet 6 -10 Pore Pressure Pw PSI 1 - r --r . T 1 _L r r � r J_ Northwest Cone Exploration Depth Increment = 0.164 feet SPT N` 60% Hammer 0 40 s i 1 sensitive fine grained El 4 silty clay to clay ® 7 silty sand to sandy silt El 10 gravelly sand to sand Eq 2 organic material 5 clayey silt to silty clay S 8 sand to silty sand ® 11 very stiff fine grained (*) ® 3 clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 0 9 sand 0 12 sand to clayey sand (1 CPT -2 Wells -Fargo TOC Annex Tukwila, Washington GEOEfVGIF1EER Figure A -5 SYMBOL EXPLORATION NUMBER DEPTH (ft) SOIL CLASSIFICATION 1 15 Sandy silt (ML) 1 35 Sand with silt (SP -SM) • =. I= ■N M .I O - = s ■M = • = MI M - • MI r TACO: \5\ 5206008 \00 \Finals \520600800FigureA6.ppt DCR:MES:tt 041707 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE 3" 1.5" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 C • 1 • • Q 0 1000 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.01 COBBLES GRAVEL COARSE I FINE SAND COARSE I MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY 0.001 SYMBOL EXPLORATION NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT ( %) LIQUID LIMIT ( %) PLASTICITY INDEX ( %) SOIL DESCRIPTION • 1 10' 53.0 38 12 Silt (ML) CH or OH P f . OH or MH /\ .,. LcrOL • ML or OL SYMBOL EXPLORATION NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT ( %) LIQUID LIMIT ( %) PLASTICITY INDEX ( %) SOIL DESCRIPTION • 1 10' 53.0 38 12 Silt (ML) N M • OM = OM N NM UM NM = NM I • 111111 N TACO: \5\ 5206008 \00 \Finals \520600800FigureA DCR:MES:tt 041707 60 50 x 40 w z I- 30 I- d 20 10 PLASTIC ffY C HART 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT 70 80 90 100 GEOENGINEERS // • APPENDIX B REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE • • APPENDIX B REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. ' GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, PERSONS AND PROJECTS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Craft Architects, Inc. and their authorized agents. ' This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, a geotechnical or geologic study conducted for a civil engineer or architect may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer or architect that are involved in the same project. Because each geotechnical or geologic study is unique, each geotechnical engineering or geologic report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our Client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to ' such reliance in writing. This is to provide our firm with reasonable protection against open -ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with the Client and generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT - SPECIFIC FACTORS This report has been prepared for the Wells -Fargo TOC Annex in Tukwila, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project - specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or 111 • completed before important project changes were made. For example, changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure; • elevation, configuration, location, orientation or weight of the proposed structure; • composition of the design team; or • project ownership. 1 I Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org. ' File No. 5206- 008 -00 April 17, 2007 S� Page B -1 GEOENGINEERS I If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as i appropriate. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE I This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by manmade events such as construction on or adjacent to the site, or by natural events such as floods, I earthquakes, slope instability or ground water fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers before applying a report to determine if it remains applicable. 1 TOPSOIL For the purposes of this report, we consider topsoil to consist of generally fine- grained soil with an I appreciable amount of organic matter based on visual examination, and to be unsuitable for direct support of the proposed improvements. However, the organic content and other mineralogical and gradational characteristics used to evaluate the suitability of soil for use in landscaping and agricultural purposes was I not determined, nor considered in our analyses. Therefore, the information and recommendations in this report, and our logs and descriptions should not be used as a basis for estimating the volume of topsoil available for such purposes. I MOST GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC FINDINGS ARE PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS I Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOT FINAL I Do not over -rely on the preliminary construction recommendations included in this report. These recommendations are not final, because they were developed principally from GeoEngineers' professional judgment and opinion. GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual I subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. I Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from I those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. I I File No. 5206 - 008 -00 Page B -2 GEOENGMEERS� April 17, 2007 • • A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT COULD BE SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION ' Misinterpretation of this report by other design team members can result in costly problems. You could lower that risk by having GeoEngineers confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain GeoEngineers to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans ' and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering or geologic report. Reduce that risk by having GeoEngineers participate in pre -bid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. ' Do NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS l Geotechnical engineers and geologists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering or geologic report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. GIVE CONTRACTORS A COMPLETE REPORT AND GUIDANCE Some owners and design professionals believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with GeoEngineers ' and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A pre - bid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might an owner be in a position to give contractors the best information available, while ' requiring them to at least share the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Further, a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in your project budget and schedule. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SAFETY ON THEIR OWN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's procedures, methods, schedule or management of the work site. The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for ' managing construction operations to minimize risks to on -site personnel and to adjacent properties. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering or geology) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. File No. 5206- 008 -00 April 17, 2007 Page B -3 GEOENGINEERS / 1 • • GEOTECHNICAL, GEOLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. BIOLOGICAL POLLUTANTS GeoEngineers' Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention, or assessment of the presence of Biological Pollutants in or around any structure. Accordingly, this report includes no interpretations, recommendations, findings, or conclusions for the purpose of detecting, preventing, assessing, or abating Biological Pollutants. The term "Biological Pollutants" includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi, spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts. File No. 5206- 008 -00 April 17, 2007 Page B -4 GEOENGINEERS til ■ MI<,1111vVil • IRU�UUP11�� UU U I[1I I I III (fri JJ /A NEW BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING ( TOC) • O ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1 SOME: 1 0 10 PROJECT NORM i GENERAL NOTES A. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDRIONAL INFORMATION. ALL DETAILS APPLY FOR APPUCABLE SITUATIONS WHETHER REFERENCED ON THE PLAN OR NOT. B. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDRIONAL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR SITE LUMINAIRES. C. ALL SITE UGHTING CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL MOUNTED ON ROOF. SHEET NOTES c ••edit this MTEXT•a RECEIV JUN 01 2007 commuNITY DEveLop Iwr Awe+. • C RA - FT B r En I T C d I S Tf ral r % 917 fl�I f •.t � ... -..� L. le nn \.: —• ter. III 1■ /0,1 .nr 20i,.'21.! 1' www.cratterc h,tectt corn CONSULTANT Revisions: to co z CC O o H Q � CC lx W W O 0) > X U X X GLUMAC .1.0000.,4.,.. 10.00. T10.1 .0 does. zum we ve J. 01A FERGUSON co..e. J. ✓'ERGUSON eapeeen b, • m¢wrt• tar, Sheet Title: D.SO RIGAL 517E PLAN Date: 5+1501 Design: ,prF Drawn: Project No: 2pry(p IA Approved: Sheet No: E1.0 COPYRIGI Nr102007 G U iAC 04=1 IFSa FINISH LEGEND 1:77MR,V7 7.1.1 pug. P.C. URI M. WSW.. 097 DECOMTI 77 . 7 . 1,111 0. III 1=1 62322 =El 12=1E=F41 .0 4717 7 YUMA LOP A WEST ELEVATION ti: ■11 :Art OLE KV U. 707. •767 mAJNA 1 j Th NORTH ELEVATION t riNtisilikz. ( EAST ELEVATION 2 - WEST ELEVATION \ /Aar • ■.-c. [1101111111111,b Mlittalj isurargamattohtF:s • •.Efr;II. L,.,Lamf" *F' (VOUTN ELEVATION C.K.711 71.7714. 1 . 4.17 710....1 Eg EOM (4 ; - CReirr CONSULTANT COOFIFICHr caFT morrEcrs 2CC7 TWEE DOCUILNIS WV POT EE REPRODUCED WITI OUT EXTTES9 %KITTEN MUSSON EN CREFT AFORECTS OR WELLS FARGO BSUE 6C0 07 SITE FERSITTAL ,120.5 07 BULENG POW masa& 12_ A4.1 H WATER MARK TOE OF SLOPE $ +37' D _ _ - TOP OF LEVY a_ FOICE GREEN MYER A-For,,n4 10' -0 - / 14' -0 ® ENLA 3 RGED PLAN va• - 1'-o• o ,, 2 MIS OF OM uror we ' a,a'4,+wrt' §4 5,4 5 1. yetrl .koLu ! 4+ P' a�7'±nit'g�x+giM1' §rN_krM1'4rF' §� r;6.-0" 32' - +1 66' - 6' 10 ®ARCHITECTURAL SITE SECTION V18 - P-0 02 4 ,o an 41' T.O. CHU WALL GROUND , §,, , �k��� §�e•?T,T+; §. >w Tt SW 43RD 8TTI T (80.1801H STREET) 0 TYP6 F-11* • KEY NOTES: Ol EXIST. CHAIN UNK FENCE TO REMAIN, EXTEND BOTTOM OF FENCE 18 BELOW GROUND (ANCHORED AT BASE). ADD PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER. 2O NEW 8' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK NNYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER TO MATCH EXISTING, EXTEND BOTTOM OF FENCE 18' BELOW GROUND (ANCHORED AT BASE). NEW 10' HIGH ELECT. ROWNG GATE WITH INTERWOVEN SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, REMOTE OPERATION NEW 10' -O HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE BLACK NNYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, ANCHORED AT BASE. NEW CHAIN UNK GATE W/ LOCK EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO FE-MAIN NEW LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION RESEAL & RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING NEW ASPHALT, EXTRUDED CURB & STRIPING EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN 0 0 0 4 0 0 NEW CONC. SIDEWALK W/ BROOM FINISH & 5' SCORING PATTERN NEW PEA GRAVEL PTD STEEL, CONC. FILLED BOLLARDS REFER ALSO TO DETAIL 14/8.1. NEW ENTRY PEDESTAL {INTERCOM) NEW 10' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK NNYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER AND INTERWOVEN SLATS, ANCHORED AT BASE WATER AND IRRIGATION METERS TRANSFORMER; REFER TO A2.1 FOR PAD INFORMATION. GENERATOR; REFER TO A2.1 FOR PAD INFORMATION. GAS METER. LOCATE TO READ METER THROUGH FENCE. ALL EXPOSED PIPING TO BE LOCATED BEHIND FENCE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROPOSED BUILDING AND SURROUNDING SITE WILL NOT HAVE ANY NEW SIGNAGE 0 NEW CURB RAMP PER 406 DN SHEET 71.2 AND DETAILS 17 & 1 B /A8.1. NEW SIGNAGE PER 502 /503 ON SHEET T1.2 AND DETAIL 16/A8.1 • 0 • 0 0 0 • VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL PER 502/503 ON SHEET T1.2 CAR ACCESSIBLE STALL PER 502/503 ON SHEET T1.2 ACCESS AISLE PER 502 /503 ON SHEET 71.2 MAIN ENTRANCE NEW BIKE RACK, DOUBLE BEND. CAPACITY (4). STANDARD PARKING STALL NEW CONC. PAD NEW 10' -0 HIGH STEEL ORNAMENTAL FENCE, BLACK NEW STEEL ORNAMENTAL GATE, BLACK W /LOCK NEW ASPHALT PATHWAY 5' -O WIDE. 5' -0 FROM FENCE NEW STRIPING ON ASPHALT FDR PEDESTRIAN PATH EXISTING BUILDING PARCEL 'D" FENCED TURN - AROUND 1BOTH ST COVERED TRUCK I u 1 1��n LOADING - .vi ■Im 1 4th 0 16 °I) • •a' 'wn ': bYL� , c7 ii( i %i 1 ° • 1 PARCEL "E" PARCEL ' B" PHASE 2. PARKING LOT 56 PARKING STALLS EXISTING BUILDING - SPERRY PARCEL "A" II ca MSC MEN 1101 PARCEL "C" ApPRV ► a34, . O ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN r - *o' -0• 0 5 10 20 40 Revisions: Sheet Title: Dote: Design: Drown: Project No: Approved: Sheet No: Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 fax www.craftarchitects.com ONSUL TANT z O F cc g cc J W ®corWallHT CRAFT ARCFIIEC'iS =TIME DOCW®1TS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITH OUT EXPRESS YEMEN PENSION BY CRAFT ARCHIEC78 OR WB18 FARGO. ISSUE 1109.07 BITE FESUBMITTAL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 11/09/07 JAKB MLR,SN 746.00 KC Original drawing is 24' Scale entities accordingly if reduced COMIGHt CRAFT ARCHITECTS 2007 A1.0 Le MINUS CRU ROCK ADJACENT T THE BLDG. 18 WI MIN. 4' DEEP. COVERED .D TRUCK LOADING PEA GRAVEL PATH. W/ CONCRETE CURB (5) 2 -3 MAN WEATHERED GRANITE OUTCROP PEA GRAVEL PATH W/ CONCRETE CURB PEA QRAVEL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4. WITH (3) 4 MAN AND (8) 2 -3 MAN WEATHERED GRANITE LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ARCHITECT. oA •...ai. Nam • .. •w��wla������l�l ■77.11elilitift e�! r__ aue_�.ww�• I1ummu I EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN' APPROX. OMIT OF DRIPUNE PRUNE BACK TO TRUNK ANY BRANCHES CLOSER THEN 6' TO TOP OF' FENCE. ve MINUS ROCK BETWEt�CURB AND FENCE. MINIMUM 4" DEEP. • TREES ,1 1 ACER GRISEUM / PAPER )RK MAPLE GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD' / AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO ACER RUBRUM 'ARMSTRC ,/ [ �I '. I �' / COUI,MNAR RED MAPLE il r" ACER X FREEMANII ',EFFERSRED' / AUTUMN BALZE MAPLE CER MACROPHYLLUM / BIG LEAF MAPLE BETULA PAPYRIFERA / PAPER BIRCH ACER gRCINATUM / VINE MAPLE THUJA PUCATA / WESTERN RED CEDAR SHRUBS DSTUS X PURPUREUS / ORCHID ROCKROSE TAXUS 'DARK GREEN SPREADER' / SPREADING YEW BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'AUREA' / GOLDEN BARBERRY BERBERIS T. 'CRIMSON PYGMY' / CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA 'ABBOSTSWOOD' / CINQUEFOIL SPIRAEA 'MAGIC CARPET / MAGIC CARPET SPIREA NANDINA DOMESTICA 'MOON BAY / MOON BAY HEAVENLLY BAMBOO LEUCOTHOE FONTANESANA 'SCARLETTA' / DROOPING LEUCOTHOE MAHONIA AOUIFODUM 'COMPACTA' / OREGON GRAPE CORNUS STOLONIFERA / REDTWIG DOGWOOD RUBUS SPECTABIUS / SAIMONBERRY PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS / NINEBARK SYMPHORICARPOS ALBA / SNOWBERRY CORNUS STOLONIFERA 'KELSEN' / DWARF REDTWIG DOGWOOD PERENNIALS / GRASSES / FERNS EUPHORBIA CHARADAS 'WULFENII' / EUPHORBIA PHORMIUM IENAX 'JACK SPRATT / DWARF NEW ZEALAND FLAX HEUCTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS / BLUE OAT GRASS POLYSTICUM MUNITUM / WESTERN SWORD FERN GROUNDCOVER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA -URSI / KINNIKINNICK FRAGARIA CHILOENSIS / BEACH STRAWBERRY LAWN :i<S ?'• <' EMERGENTS 750 JUNCOS ENSIFODUS / COMMON RUSH 25% SDRPUS MICROCARPUS / SMALL- FRUITED BULRUSH 2" CAL B&B 2" CAL B&B 2" CAL B&B 2" CAL B&B 2' CAL B&B 2' CAL B&B 2' CAL B&B 8' HT. B&B MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' O.0 MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.0 MIN 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MIN 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MW 18" HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MIN 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.0 MIN. 18' HT. CONT, 3' O.C. MIN 18" HT. CONT., 3' O.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT, 3' O.C. MIN 18' HT. CONT, 4' O.C. MIN 18" HT. CONT, 4' O.0 MIN 18" HT. CONT, 4' O.0 MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' O.C. MIN. 18' HT. CONT, 3' O.0 GAL. CONT. 3' O.C. GAL CONT, 3' O.C. GAL CONT., 3' O.C. GAL CONT. 1 GAL 24' O.C. 4" POT 12" O.C. SOD SOD 4" POT 12' O.C. 4" POT 12" O.C. N LEGEND TREE TYPH -CALIPER to DBH P I EXIS NG TREES TO'REMAIN NORWAY MAPLE AUSTRIAN BLACK PINE B; PAPER BIRCH C 12 TREE TO BE REMOVED C. COTTONWOOD M D T M DEOD TUUP q7° WEAT1IIE.RED GRANITE (REFER TO LANDSCAPE NOTES) WASHED RIVER ROCK MIN. 6" DEPTH PEA ((RAVEL MIN. 4' DEPTH USING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. DRY RIVER BED * LANDSCAPE PLAN IB�H 1 = 20' -o EXISTING MONUMENTI SIGN ti z x a '41 Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 fax www.crafterchltects.com CONSUL AN 1/\/.:_113 L A Site e Irrigation 16630 X(h Dr. 38 Botha WA 98012 *aro (4 29 4 17 -46 09 fart (425 488.16B ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATI 05.25.07 SERA/SHORELINE 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERM 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Slog Mee Date DesPa Dram Project Noe APProwt LANDSCAPE PLAN 5/23/07 W CB 746.00 (H Wed dateYKe!r, �a .I IaemlMr K nil6aA CERIEME 50t L _� 5/99/07 9Vi -115 BARK MULCH EDGE OF BED \ 1 1 1 200' SHORELINE AREA \ 1 i 1 f L 1 I TO REMAINI— I SCAPE 1 1 \ —I 1 ..maMb 0_, � � � A _ ill eal ,: nrl 0O O .. 0 0 Oee000OOO Oc •• OO'e000 0 OOOOO�J0,0.0 _ Of00000000eJO ►o0o X0000000000 ♦O , _ ` _ _ _ 0,0,00,00000 00:0_OOv e a ' elooee oe.e000ee'e'eeoeeeee ewoe. oeoeeeo +000e. �e.o'eee.-. t eo __ iltillo 1 40 SPERRY'1BUILDING PARC I L "A" O GROUND COVER SPACING Nrs NOTE SPACING TO BE TRIANG. PER DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLANT SCHEDULE -041-1111- III-111m=111111=111111 III III Il Ills ENIIiI _IIIIIIJIIiII_IIIIil= 111111OM 111111 =11111 O SHRUB PLANTING Nrs SET CROWN AT NURSERY HEIGHT BARK MULCH PER SPECS BACKFILL TO CONSIST OF TOPSOIL PER SPECS. ADD FERTIUZER PER SPECS SCARIFY ROOTBALL ON CONTAINER MATERIAL REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIAL PLANT TREES HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ROOTBALL O DECIDUOUS TREE STAKING Nrs LANDSCAPE PLAN IhXml 1" = 2O' -0" Ilion - II I 111 111111= 111111 = 111111 °III II PIT TO BE 2X SECURE TRUNK WITH DOUBLE STRAND OF 14 GAUGE GALV. WIRE WRAPPED IN CLEAR VINYL TWIST TIGHT 2 DIA. "BVC" LODGEPOLE PINE TREE STAKES WITH 6" CONICAL POINT 36" DIA TREE WELLS IN LAWN AREAS, FILL WITH 1" OF SPECIFIED MULCH REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. LOOSEN WIRE BASKETS BACKFILL PIT WITH 50% TOPSOIL AND 50% NATIVE SOIL ADD SPECIFIED FERTILIZER TO MIX LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB ALL EXISTING BED AREAS SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW LANDSCAPE 2. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS AND WITHIN PARKING LOT TO BE SET AT 8" MINUS FINISH ELEVATION EXCEPT AS NOTED. THESE AREAS TO RECEIVE IMPORTED TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8". ROTOTILLED THOROUGHLLY INTO SUBGRADE ALL EXISTING BEDS THAT ARE SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW PLANTING TO BE PIT PLANTED WITH A 50/50 MIX OF EXISTING SUBGRADE AND IMPORTED TOPSOIL 3. ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE FINE BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF r. EXISTING BEDSI TO BE MULCHED AS NOTED. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN SELECTED TO BE DROUGHT TOLERANT. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WATERING AS REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OI; WORK BY OWNER. 5. GROUND COVER TO EXTEND UNDER ALL DECIDUOUS TREE CANOPIES AT THE SPECIFIED SPACING TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE IN AU. PLANTING BEDS DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE GROUND COVER. GROUNDCOVER BENEATH EVERGREEN TREES TO BE MAINTAIN A 3' CLEARANCE FROM BASE OF TRUNK. 6. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARE BASED ON THE SUE PLANS PREPARED BY CRAFT ARCHITECTS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO THE SITE PLANS WHICH MAY REQUIRE ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN. 7. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT THE HEALTH OF PLANT MATERIAL 8. NO PRE - EMERGENT HERBICIDES TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SITE DURING THE FIRST TEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. 9. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE BOULDERS TO BE PLACED IN PLANTING BEDS AS NOTED. BOULDERS TO BE SET INTO THE SUBGADE AND POSITIONED THAT ALL EXPOSED SIDES OF THE BOULDER SLOPES DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF BOULDER. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE ARE AVAILABLE AT MARENAKO'S ROCK CENTER PRESTON, WASHINGTON. PHONE (425 -392 -3313) WASHED RIVER ROCK 1 -6" DIA. TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 4" CONCRETE WALK CRUSHED SUBBASE FOR WALK NOTE ROCK OUTCROP TO CONSIST OF WEATHERED GRANITE 2 -3 MAN SET ROCK WITH ALL EXPOSED SIDES SLOPING OUT AND AWAY FROM TOP OF ROCK O ROCK OUTCROP DETAIL HIS CONCRETE CURB ASPHALT PAVING BUILDING WALL ROCKS TO BE SET FIRM AND 'WITHIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE. AN APPROX. 1/3 OF THE ROCK MASS TO BE SET BELOW GRADE FOR SETTING ROCK. REMOVE ADDITIONAL ASPHALT AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL IRRIGATION HEADS ADJACENT TO CURB 6 a >aNe -`6`r• r•� 4% O ISLAND PLANTING DETAIL HIS ESTABLISH CROWN AS INDICATED SOD OR MULCH PER PLAN 5% SOD -0" MULCH -1" IMPORT TOPSOIL AS SPECIFIED o sal REMOVE CRUSHED TOP COURSE AS INDICATED. SCARIFY EXISTING SUBGRADE TO DEPTH OF 6" AND BACKFILL WITH IMPORT TOPSOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS CRUSHED TOP COURSE WE6 RESItBED HOMO \IlcAll OWEIE 14 301 APPRO CPj t a r c h i t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 206.720.7001 hon 206.720.2949 e I'ac www.crartarchitects.com CONSULTANT '! B LA 1683080th R SE. Beta* WA 98012 phone I4W 417 -4669 sec UM 486158 ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA /SHORELINES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Sheet Mk Date: Draw Protect Na ■rrte•11ma z m z0� o 0P U P < LL J > ( C ) co I W Landscepe Architecture Stte Planning trrtganon LANDSCAPE PLAN 5/18/07 CB CB 746.00 OB i103 /o, 1'T b R 11 Ada aallia an10tdr R nitad Sheathe 110 L -1 S/0.307 746 - 410 Wells Fargo TOC Annex Cash Vault Relocation Project March 14, 2007 Revised Project Scope — Construct New Building on adjacent undeveloped property RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 PERMIT CENTEF Wells Fargo is the owner of the TOC Annex located at 18035 Sperry Drive. Wells Fargo also owns the undeveloped parcel to the north between the TOC Annex and S. 180 Street. The southwest property line borders the dike for the Green River. The closest building corner is approximately 100' from the edge of the dike and 60' -104' from the property line. The existing asphalt parking lot extends to the property line on two sides. We propose extending this parking on to the undeveloped parcel. The new 13,000 g.s.f. single -story sprinklered tilt -up concrete structure with adjacent truck loading area (5,683g.s.f.) is 22' tall. Wells Fargo intends to relocate their cash vault from downtown Seattle to this building in 2008. The project will be completed in phases with construction commencing in August 2007. The two phases are as follows: Phase One: 1. Add 56 parking stalls to the Wells Fargo owned parcel across Sperry Drive (shown on attached drawings). Phase Two: 1. Construct New Building: a. Extend parking lot, modify existing adjacent parking lot. b. Add storm water detention pond. c. Provide landscape screening and fencing between the Green River dike and the truck loading area. d. Construct a concrete privacy wall from the northwest corner to the west to screen the armored truck delivery area. This area will also need a roof and secure screened fencing with an electronic gate. e. Install a new panelized concrete vault. f. Add exterior building lighting. g. Add exterior security elements — bollards, fencing. Questions l � ' y r 1. The single occupant "mantraps" are designed to release in an emergency. Do you have any special requirements for exiting through these doors? 2. Can each of the exit vestibule doors be on 15- second delay? 3. The proposed covered truck loading structure will be located approximately 100' from the toe of the dike slope. Are there any special shoreline requirements? 4. Can we provide a fence at the back of curb parallel to the Green River? LANDSCAPING a k . 5 \ . S 180TH ST LANDSCAPING VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE DETENTION POND i 4N0' GENERAL NOTES ADDRESS: 18035 SPERRY DRIVE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 2. TAX PARCEL #: 3623049095 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 362304 95 PORS OF GL 4 & OF •L 1 IN SEC 35 LY S OF 1/16 LN EXTND DAF BEG AT NW COR OF SEC 36 TH S ALG W LN THOF 1355.89 FT TO TPOB & S MGN OF S 180TH ST TH ELY ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 02 -45 -45 E RAD 336 FT C/A 01 -32 -04 A DIST OF 9 FT TO S LN OF N 36 FT OF SD GL 4 TH S 88 -46 -19 E ALG SD S LN 274.81 FT TH ON CRV RGT RAD 50 FT C/A 90 -00 -00 A DIST OF 78.54 FT TH S 01 -13 -41 W 58 FT TH N 88 -46 -19 W TO SWLY LN OF GL 1 IN SEC 35 TH NWLY ALG SD SWLY LN TO WLY EXT OF N LN OF SD GL 4 TH S 88 -46 -19 E ALG SD WLY EXT TAP 142.38 FT W OF NW CUR SD GL 4 TH ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 27 -59 -38 E RAD 336 FT 147.96 FT TO TPOB TGW UND IN1 IN PRIVATE RD ADJ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES 4. CONTACT: KATHY CRAFT CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVE, #408 SEATTLE, WA 98101 P (206) 720.7001 F (206) 720.2949 n PHASE 1: PARKING LOT REQUIRES SEPA 5. USE: CV OPERATIONS 6. EXISTING SITE AREA: 55,500 S.F. (1.27 ACRES) 7. NEW BUILDING AREA: 12,983 G.S.F. NEW TRUCK TRAP AREA: 5,682 G.S.F. 8. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IIIB 9. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY: B — OFFICE 10. NO "SIGNIFICANT TREES OR ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREAS PERTAIN TO THIS SITE 11. EXISTTNG PARKING: TOC ANNEX: 60 STALLS SPERRY BUILDING: 58 STALLS TOTAL.: 118 STALLS ■ NEW PARKING: TOC ANNEX: 43 STALLS SPERRY BUILDING: 56 STALLS TOTAL: 99 STALLS S ASE URITY. GATE PROPOSED BUILDING \ 0 r EXISTING BUILDING a ? ° o / SPERRY BUILDING A UTILITY ; EASEMENT. . ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN IGIt74 r 40' -0w CRArr a r c h i t e c t s o , F, cr.,A° , .a ' • vtt, 4 00 ,.:.n�. Wn nai www craft. ISSLE Revisions: Sheet rule Sheet No: wwe.4,m. z ccgri > � ARCHITECTURAL S TE PLAN Dote 12/08/06 Design IOIC Drown MLR Project No 746.00 Approved IOIC Onqinai arawing ¢ 24' , 3E. Score entities accordingly if reduced A1.0 ooniO7 746 -MO 59' -1' 165-0' GENERAL NOTES 1. AU. EXISTING COLUMN, EXTERIOR WALLS, WINDOWS, AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TO REMAIN.' 2. AU. NEW PARNRON WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE U.O.N. 3. FOR EGRESS AND ACCESSBIUTY COMPUANCE REFER TO SHEET T1.3 4. NO CHANGE IN PERCENTAGE OF EXISTING GLAZING IN EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS. EXISTING HVAC EQUIPMENT IS HEAT PUMP. 5. AU. CONFERENCE ROOMS, RESTROOMS, AND AREAS WHERE INDICATED SWILL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 1/2' SOUND ATTENUATION IN THE INTERIOR PERIMETER WALLS AND 6' ABOVE THE CEILING (24' WIDE). LEGEND NEW INTERIOR WALLS NEW PARTITION WALLS ;I WALLS W/ 3 1/2' SOUND ATTENUATION r /// /i AREA NOT IN SCOPE OF WO R *I + HOSE BIBS V C , ® FLOOR DRAIN 1n %- ites) C I. 0- IOW CRAfi' a r c h i t e c t s 1•.m.n.11 (.0e, 3.■ ■rt, ^g 932 r..•1 Aven S .Itf 108 W 9B 0' ?Ob 7207001 hcne :eo 12 0 2949 Pa. www s raftarchltec ts.com CONSULTANT Revisions: ww.r�rd. Sheer the FLOOR PLAN Dote 5/17/06 Design ,IAKB Drown MLR Project No 746.00 Appr oveo KC Onq:nal Growing is 24 Scale entities accordingly it reduced Sheet No A21 MLR 01/20/07 746 -021 CITY UP T UR WILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 L Pre - Application Project Summary i Project Name: Site Address: WELLS - AI2-& 0 t4.vv c V omiPAT1oNS $UIL pIN� xxx s'f Y Wlv Description of Proposal: rENIV (0 C. TILT LW 111-i 1 UNI?f.VtLar p r447.cL. • 0 Yes ❑ No If "yes" please describe: 1' 1 - 2 -rf DUI Lt7)(•16 3 Lo 1 Anticipated period of Construction: Will this project be developed in phases? From: Are there any existing or proposed easements on the site? Yes ❑ No If "yes" please describe: °I i rfavi trio V AND 20.' LCri LITY l . v14$UT' Building,tnforina Current Assessed Value of Building by King County: $ - e Value of Proposed Project: $ 2 , boo, oo0 • Total Square Footage of Building: l 3, n (' D �F King County Assessor Account No(s): - 1 v to 1 4E' t•MNItt r ite•17 q AND 11(40 L Please indicate the square footage of each floor, broken down by building use(s). Use additional sheet if necessary. FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR Building Use cv Occupancy oIC Classification Square Footage ( co o Number of Parking Stalls: Existing: Proposed: Fire Protection: Existing: Proposed: Contact Person: Mailing Address: E -Mail Address: Standard: --e- l � Standard: Q:\Applications\Fonns- Applications On Line \12 -2006 - Pre - application Fortn.doc Page 1 of 2 Revised: 12-4-06 Compact: — - C o m p a c t : _ ❑ Sprinklers ❑ Automatic Fire Alarm p None 34 Sprinklers .. )Zr Automatic Fire Alarm p None Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? CM 'T , CP -P(FT A/paf 1 T FATS t' 2, -. NisT 4v Nl1- 4 , q8 10 I !E cTtt la cliLkiPT Mat rTECTS -ow% 1'V11 k. 1111' VUG -VA1L Pre -App File No.: 6ti Date Received: 3' 16'b 1 Meeting Date: ? J • 2 t. b1 Time: 2- 30 To: °°/2.00 Type of Construction per 2003 IBC: t r .� Handicap:— Handicap: No ❑ Yes If "yes" please describe: Contact Person Phone: 20b 720 100 I Fax No.: 20 IP 7Z10 2.111 The pre - application meeting is for you and the City staff to preliminarily review your project prior to submitting permits applications This helps you to learn about and discuss our regulations and plan submittal requirements, to provide early discussion of any major issues, and to facilitate the plan review process. NOTE: If you have specific questions or issues regarding your proposal that you would like addressed at your pre - application meeting, we encourage you to submit them with your application. This will allow staff to do the necessary research to answer your questions /concerns. PROCEDURE: The Development Review Committee (DRC) meets every Thursday afternoon. Two time slots are available for pre - application meetings on a first -come first -serve basis, 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m. The meeting takes approximately one hour. Your pre - application and submittal requirements must be presented to the Permit Center ten (10) days prior to the meeting (Monday, 5:00 p.m. deadline) along with the $230.00 application fee. Submittals will not be accepted through the mail, over the fax or by a messenger service. Our meetings are informal. We usually begin with our questions and/or major issues we see. Your design team is encouraged to participate (i.e., architects, engineers, project coordinators, etc.). Staff from Building, Fire, Planning and Public Works will be preset at the meeting. The Parks and Recreation Department and Police Department will provide written comments pertaining to your pre - application submittal, if necessary. We take notes during the meeting. Within one week following the meeting, a summary of all comments prepared in checklist format will be forwarded to the contact person identified on the sign -in sheet presented at the meeting. Along with the comments will be permit applications, plan submittal requirements, selected ordinances and general information as it pertains to your project. If you have any questions or want to participate in this process, please feel free to contact the Permit Center at (206) 431 -3670. PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST: Your pre - application plan submittal checklist is a guide. However, the more information submitted, the more complete our assessment can be. Please submit eight (8) sets of plans containing the following along with the completed application: SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS ❑ Distance between structures and property lines ❑ Width of any adjacent public right -of- way(s) ❑ Designated landscape areas ❑ Easements (including railroad, Puget Power, etc.) ❑ Parking layout ❑ Truck loading area designations ❑ Access points and traffic circulation pattern ❑ Footprint of existing and/or proposed structures ❑ Significant natural features (water, slopes, vegetation, etc) ❑ Identify sites proximity to river environment if less than 200 feet from the river ❑ Topography map (for slopes over 15 %) PRE - APPLICATION SUBMITTAL FEE ❑ The $230.00 application fee is to be submitted at the time of application. If you choose to pursue your project and make application within 90 days from your meeting date, your $230.00 will be refunded to you. Q: Applications\Forms- Applications On Line \12 -2006 - Pre - application Form.doc Page 2 of 2 Revised: 12-4-06 c-Application Procedure WORKING DRAWINGS ❑ Structure — General layout ❑ Exits and exiting pattern ❑ Uses and dimensions of all spaces ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ❑ Vicinity Map — include north arrow Project Scope Wells Fargo TOC Annex Cash Vault Relocation Project December 5, 2007 Wells Fargo is the owner of the TOC Annex located at 18035 Sperry Drive. The southwest property line borders the dike for the Green River. The closest building corner is approximately 100' from the edge of the dike and 81' from the property line. The existing asphalt parking lot extends to the property line on two sides. There is a large landscape strip on the east side of the building and a narrow strip on the north side. Wells Fargo also owns the undeveloped parcel to the north between the TOC Annex and S. 180 Street. The existing 20,250 s.f. sprinklered tilt -up concrete structure was built in 1976 and is approximately 17' tall. Fire department access is limited to only three doors. It is currently partially occupied by a credit card /payment processing division of Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo intends to relocate their cash vault from downtown Seattle to this building in 2008. The project will be completed in phases with construction commencing in August 2007. The three phases are as follows: Phase One: 1. Add 56 parking stalls to the Wells Fargo owned parcel across Sperry Drive (shown on attached drawings). Phase Two: 1. Provide new HVAC system for the entire building by replacing the existing boiler with four new roof top units. Screening will be provided. 2. Install a new back up generator and fuel supply to be located along the west side of the buiding. 3. Construct new shared restrooms and lunch room in existing vacant space. CIIyOFTUiM /LA DU; 08 zoos PERMITCENTER Phase Three: 1. Increase the amount of landscape screening between the Green River dike and the truck loading area. 2. Add structural seismic upgrades to the existing structure. 3. Increase the number of emergency exits and fire department access doors around the perimeter. 4. Add two drive -in overhead doors to the north end of the west wall to allow armored vehicles to back into a secure "truck trap" within the structure. 5. Add a concrete privacy wall from the northwest corner to the west to screen the armored truck delivery area. This area will also need a roof and secure screened fencing with an electronic gate. 6. Demolish the existing restroom core and lunch room. 7. Install a new panelized concrete vault. 8. Build out the interior tenant improvements that include bullet resistant demising walls, secured man traps, private offices and open work stations. Questions 1. Can we extend a fence from the new screen wall over to the west property line and along the toe of the dike along the southwest property line? 2. As an option, would it be acceptable to fence the entire perimeter? 3. The proposed covered truck structure will be located approximately 100' from the toe of the dike slope. Are there any special shoreline applications or reviews required due to its approximation to the Green River? 4. We have increased the number and location of fire department access doors but the existing building will not be fully compliant. Is that acceptable? 5. What are your mechanical screening requirements? 6. The man traps are designed to release in an emergency. Do you have any special requirements for exiting through these doors? p-\ \drc\planlist.doc Updated: 2 -25 -05 CITY OF ^UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 http: / /www.ci.tukwi la.wa.us Pre - Application File No.: PRE06 -052 Meeting Date and Time: 12-21-06 @ 2:30 pm The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PLANNING DIVISION - Land Use Information 1. Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) [!,' 2. Obtain the following land use permits /approvals: Binding Site Plan Improvement Plan Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Des Environmental (SEPA) Planned Mixed Use Development Planned Residential Development Rezone ER 3. Zoning designation: f „ C, El 4. Minimum setback requirements: Front: /'T ( Second Front: 5. Maximum Building Height: a { C, Pre Application Checklist Project Name: Site Address: Wells Fargo TOC Annex 18035 Sperry Dr 0 Height exception area? Shoreline Management Permit Tree Permit-4- tl`' Short Subdivision Sign(s) Subdivision Unclassified Use Variance Other: Site located in sensitive area? 6. Minimum parking stalls required: j) /c l_) stalls required: ❑ Yes Side: /c` ( Rear: ) c [ 8. Minimum landscaping required: Front: / / Second Front: r J ` _ a t Side: C. Rear: ,'2 Yes ❑ No ./Aor [id No 7. No more than 30% of required parking stalls may be compact. No landscape overhangs into compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hitting the curb will be required. 9. Minimum, interior parking lot requirements: ,/( �F` �4 ..(� `;�, l e vV ( L: (Ne c�..ny� 9. Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). [4 10. Roof -top mechanical units, satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened, Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 11. Trash enclosures and storage areas must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 12. Building permit plans which deviate from that already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re- application for design review approval. Checklist prepared by (staff): �1 v rt.--. l %'14 Date: 0 v( 6 12_,/1 - k' yv, , G�v (\kat k, . C Lv1 C_l ✓��, ?L° Tom; Y1 �Pk� �T % cJl.. . C : �r �1tn.lCl, .�'' J \drc\pwlist.doc 12/12/2006 CITY Of TU KWI LA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Pre-Application File Nt Meeting Date and Time: 12- 2 2 :30 pm 6. Water District 'Tt,tki ui Pre - Application Checklist Project. Names Wells,Fargo TOC Annex Site Address.. 18035`Sperry Dr The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Visit www.ci.tukwila.wa.us for the Tukwila Municipal Code, Public Works Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards and Customer Assistance Bulletins. 1. This project is subject to traffic concurrency analysis. Contact the Public Works Sr. Transportation Engineer Cyndy Knighton at 206.431.2450. 2. Provide water/ sewer/ surface water/ concurrency notices. For surface water concurrency contact Ryan Larson at 206.431.2456. For water and sewer concurrency contact Mike Cusick at 206.431.2441. Drainage Basin 7. Provide water / sewer availability (concurrency) letters. 8. Water assessment $ Sewer assessment $ Assessments will be determined during the Public Works plan review process. . Provide King County/Metro Sewer Use Certificate. I +eAM i Ze g c ,t.„ci .mac. OLtes a 4 ► a-. . 10. Pavement is less than three years old and can not be cut. Sewer District 11.a0.-)t .. ova 11. Pavement mitigation fee applies to this project. Estimated remaining pavement life Charge per square foot of cut $ 3. Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals through the City's Permit Center: ❑ Type A Short Term Nonprofit ❑ Water Meter (Permanent) ❑^� Type B Short Term Profit ❑ Water Meter (Deduct) Lid' Type C Construction ❑ Water Meter (Water Only) ❑ Type D Long Term ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Type E Potential Disturbance ❑ Developer Reimbursement Agreement ❑ Type F Blanket , Turnover J! g Flood Zone Control I UCD BY RYA-I� Other: L 50 4 E►0. 3uR e-f3 1 t)A702, r; NG IJEE.. 4. Site plans must be prepared by a registered civil engineer. Sheet sizes: Minimum 14" X 17" and Maximum 24" X 36 ". 5. Provide survey data using NAD 83/91 and NAVD 1988. * ** *NOTE ** *Public Works WILL NOT ACCEP1 any other datum for public infrastructure. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pre - Application Checklist File No.: PRE06 -052 Page 2 of 2 REF 12 to page 4 o,' Pt() 86f/I A 3 _ 12. Transportation mitigation fees, based on information provided, will be # 6, 65 per sY /GFA (Ordinance 2111). % vide a id / olesc,� �l' h 1 o Itte- !o(oLp w12 13. For Flood Zone Control Permit, provide elevations converted to 1929 NGVD. The finished floor elevation for buildings in a flood plain must be at least 1' above the 100 -year flood elevation per FIRM maps. Critical facilities shall be 3' about 100 -year elevation. 14. Provide surface water design per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. Surface wat( drainage plan must be by a registered civil engineer for all projects that do not meet the Small Site Draina e Review criteria in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition.D ,4) oN +( Infiltration Restriction Level 2 Detention Required fie zio5f - 50 6 o 5 i tG 15. Provide erosion prevention and sediment control per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. 17. Provide a sight distance analysis per the most current edition of AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design. ri 16. The Geotechnical report must include riverbank stability analysis when a project is adjacent to the Green /Duwamish River and the natural riverbank is expected to provide bank protection for the life of the project. lig '18. The maximum allowable slope for access roads and driveways is 15 %. Commercial driveway access shall bi 25 -35 feet wide. Residential driveway access shall be 10 -20 feet wide. A residential driveway must be pave( for 20' from the property line. ,-110Frfrog. ON i ater mark rh W 19. Provide applicable easements and maintenance agreements: to Tt 1 ." /Q- and K/ £oLLnf Tor re i y I'ecansfruGW/on fo meet neW ifandard5 , Contact /Ryan,larsoh,Senior our /Joie/ & iti ee , da (206 2 14M0 Gvil/ /1C40 2 put easerneht docun-iepis - loyeehe�r. ` • 20. Provide backflow prevention on: V domestic water, t fire, V' irrigation lines. t3ACK r FLD/IJ Mote LIKELY /S A 51/1/410 CHcCdC L I'E /NS/DE Fag v4 ti LT oN /)EsT S /DE 47,c SPERE Y' 0 'e fl ANa k//LL Nap 10 BE /'EPLf9CE0 Wrn16DOCLA)DETEG7DlQ oOUL3LE BECK VALUE ASSY PEde CITY 067, W5'G O °` 2j I SIAMESE FOP DEPT CONNE /0A PEE& 7U BE ,@ EPLACe.D NrTH S7LK Z. 4: :oHEsT/C al Ma) 5h al/ have, a , &PPA) Red-k Pressure ?iiHCr /e Ass vv, frees w � {fi , � y 1tisLe/ %/ �O s �' th 'h MOT �Bc x or t i cai i� eeze fr tec f. oi�, 6�1i►G/cis c c.re 1 4 thick 22. Undergrounding per TMC 11.28 applies to this project. 23. Provide turnover documents for constructed infrastructure, which the Owner will transfer to the City of Tukwila. Turnover packet enclosed. 24. Complete enclosed Business Declaration and return to King County. (Stamped SAE provided) • 25. Contact King County Water and Land Resources Industrial Waste Program for a Waste Discharge Permit of approval. Provide a copy of the approval. n Additional Comments Aid-- Subrnit cord O/ recd dei p,QH- s.e,ehf 0-10 f `/" p / 9a/14 / co yes o f a 7 ofke" �s.e — e'1S 7 tt afiece -VIL ect prole Enclosures: PC) 73u /letihs a A /, 4 .2, A3, A9 R/ B2, .C3, CS, CB beta:/ 405 67242) Checkl prepared by (staff): �� \drelpwiist.doc Updated: 2-25-05 • • Date: /2 /2i /0/6 N1,DE 5 p wvii .-vO64.4- ECOic:t I repu,jvecd I'� re j ec t- c t sf�rh5 mope l c l acae, APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. (iR55 S. TSQ-$ -\r, :St-, LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). ?RR, c �$` : 31v -az- 0 4nr pA4 Lor 1R L :v . 3(9- ca.3- O4 'j0'5 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. f 5 GA ( -zz)Lstr Address: `c7.32 rLe - r - j ST' -j5 - l'[ . \4, 98(o) Phone: 2o- 720 - '70 b1 FAX: 20(o- - 2 ! 4 / E -mail: `,\� _� , fC.Q� Cc O\Y' 6 -Q . Cm V Date: Name: Signature: P: \Planning Forms \Applica 'ens \BARApp-6- 06.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development c 041 ° 1 ?OO,HEARING 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98186-401-a49 ' FNT DESIGN Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci. tkwila. wa. us Pptift � n It twSu i wo NCB REVIEW • 41.4 sux - fur S4,pt i °V, December 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P -DR Planner: File Number: /v — 7 _ c) '7 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: '22_ 7') _0oT7 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. (iR55 S. TSQ-$ -\r, :St-, LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). ?RR, c �$` : 31v -az- 0 4nr pA4 Lor 1R L :v . 3(9- ca.3- O4 'j0'5 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. f 5 GA ( -zz)Lstr Address: `c7.32 rLe - r - j ST' -j5 - l'[ . \4, 98(o) Phone: 2o- 720 - '70 b1 FAX: 20(o- - 2 ! 4 / E -mail: `,\� _� , fC.Q� Cc O\Y' 6 -Q . Cm V Date: Name: Signature: P: \Planning Forms \Applica 'ens \BARApp-6- 06.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development c 041 ° 1 ?OO,HEARING 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98186-401-a49 ' FNT DESIGN Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci. tkwila. wa. us Pptift � n It twSu i wo NCB REVIEW • 41.4 sux - fur S4,pt i °V, December 4, 2006 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents engineers, contractors or other re sentatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property. located at LS ' 55 'S , I BO for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non- responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at SC" "r 1 1 L on 20 OR-. T l 1ol o r Pmrma roisuens -a. a« CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Soutlreenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplanriici.tukw i Ia. wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ` residing at L rt1In1 woo ss _(city), 1A0l (stare), on MAO 7-4 AI MSS w. s <J (Pri nt N „�) _ 1 - D A V s • \ =� �' )1 ) v'� W rT • 5" 3 `7' ( Addres ` 4 - 3, bdb 2.1 z. -skis 1 (Phone Num Aft (Signature) On this day personally appealed before me �_> , ► ; i me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS d7 DAY OF I p07 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for tbl' State of Washington My Commission expires • MUO, 0 and RCM zoned buildings greater than 5,000 s.f. & all with multi- family units • In the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor RC zoned structures over 1,500 s.f., outside of the TIB corridor RC zoned structures over 5,000 s.f. • TUC zoned buildings greater than 2,500 s.f. & all with multi- family units • NCC and RCC zoned developments over 1,500 s.f. • C/LI and TVS zoned buildings greater than 10,000 s.f. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ BARApp-6-06.doc, 12/04/06 l CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tulcplan@citukwila.wa.us PUBLIC HEARING DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION City of Tukwila design review combines specific standards, design criteria and illustrative design guidelines to require that all developments reflect a high level of design quality. Tukwila has two design review processes, one for projects that require a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review and one for smaller projects that are approved administratively by the DCD Director. This application packet is for public hearing design review. REQUIREMENTS: Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approval is required for the following: A. New Development or Redevelopment beyond the Existing Exterior Walls 1. All mobile/manufactured home parks and multi - family or hotel /motel buildings over 1,500 s.f.. 2. Projects in a Commercial Redevelopment Area. 3. All commercial and industrial development in various zones, when over a certain size as follows: B. Exterior Repair, Reconstruction, Cosmetic Alterations Or Improvements 1. Any exterior repairs, alterations or improvements, if the cost of that work exceeds 25% of the building's assessed value: • in the MUO, 0, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC and GLI districts, for sites with more than 10,000 g.s.f. of building area and • all sites in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor zoned NCC, MUO or RC. 2 Developments with a previous BAR approved design may make minor changes with Department approval. All other changes require Board review. C.Proposed Development Standard Waivers The BAR may reduce landscape and building setbacks for Projects in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor, in the MUO, NCC, and RC zones. PROCEDURES: At the time you submit your application you must have all of the items listed on the attached "Complete Application Checklist." You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staff either at a pre- application meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staff will mail you a letter outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested materials within' 90 days from the City's request for additional information the City may cancel your application. Staff will review the application, meet with you as needed, and formulate a recommendation to the BAR The BAR public hearing will be held after design issues are defined with staff and an environmental "Determination" has been issued. The BAR will approve, deny or conditionally approve a development based on the attached review criteria. Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning , APPLICATION MATERIALS: V 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ". -N,4 4. Application Fee $1,635. 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: .. 7. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' public notice boarc�on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 8. Payment of a $100 mailing label fee to the City of Tukwila or Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings — e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). 'W f 9. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: Pitt 10. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). iilk 11. ewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. '!— J 12. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria, see application. This is your opportunity to highlight the design features of your project. . V 13. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at The Board's approval will expire tits construction begins within three years •oard action. Modifications to the approved design at the time of building permit may require additional review of the project. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). P \Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Check items submitted with application Information Reed. W May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning www.ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd /dcdplan.htm) for additional information. SURVEY: 14 (a) The survey must include a graphic scale and north arrow. It shall be drawn with black ink in record of survey format. This shall be stamped by the surveyor. (b) An existing and proposed boundary and topographic survey (2 ft. contours including a minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line) with all structures, easements, encumbrances and right -of -way width. Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. y (c) Existing and proposed building footprints. '∎ (d) Fire access lanes and turn - arounds per Fire Department standards. V (e) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. SITE PLAN: 15 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". .' (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. V (c) Vicinity Map with site location, does not have to be to scale. `�i (d) Fire access lanes and turn- arounds per Fire Department standards. N...4 (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. 'V (f) Loading and service areas. V (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors, height and material (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50 %). LANDSCAPE PLAN: 16 (a) Landscape planting plan that meets the standards at TMC 18.52 by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". N (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: N A 17 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing aid' proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36 ". 'v (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. 'V (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for 'removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. . . . CIVIL PLANS: 18 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ BARApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 . Check items submitted with application Information Refitted. IP May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See www.ci.tukwila.wa.us /pubwks /bulletins /floodcontrol.pdf for further information V (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. (d) Total expected cut and fill. V (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. , (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to www.ci. tukwila. wa. us /pubwks /pwpermit.htm #techinfo. `-N (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (i) Plan, profile and cross - section for any right -of -way improvements. 'V (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn- arounds. OTHER: 19. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and /or any proposed screening. V 20. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. � (a � Ail IS OIL.) 21. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is recommended. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). \ V 22. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot - candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. Nk 23. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. .— Nb sc. e NA-EF P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cv C R.P�tNim 2. Name of Applicant: j 3. Date checklist prepared: • M air 15 , 2007 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ¶re 8 0 Gk \sac., 9 /o- , ISA-4WD C A.mr. to ko 1 O P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SEPAApp- 6- 06.doc 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been • • prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. (`iD C.—kA t c. l.. Z R: A fl -P? L 1`7 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 1\1a Agency Comments December 4, 2006 t;1) f'I 2 V �F I Applicant Responses: • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 9. List any government apprg �als or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 13u W L.D ft4 f ? CT 1Nt H� L, Ac.At_ j ?1-1A, ei v46 k f 1ct5�P.xta . 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. pikpLZ- )R 5, :, w - r'kkx= \tP ¥OR. s i • ,ill -4s lArnE - arav -Ncv. Pi\R -4\ 6, - co cAP-s (ASi' K AID' S\ Agency Comments 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, -- vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. FaR .L 15 1.0.c.-M_O kNtt a crtpt1 0 � �Q r 44 LPN - 049095 1 L6c SD 7 Sp Q St QRAvz. 411 to' . '_ :v ■" •' 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes — w loll. Zoo a G � k \m.iz SHomt_ • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: - b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 'D Ats.5146. G le .tARk\ 6z c' w',s -K . c. What general types of soils are -found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. `j► LT`e S(\14.0 5k O`( S1LC' lu / 9 t_A__\Nstipt d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable, soils in the immediate vicinity? If o, describe. s■ � e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. r�^ e.%, �� L1141) uPsitR5 \ , fl ' 1Lt_ ���L.L Pte _ ff S • 0 Agency Comments Applicant Responses: g. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally descr e . DIAF -ib - m4s. "1LATI -4E:ss 15 R Lo W �l'S�1� CAF ! �� ► ' �► L- tAeA C 'trb S E X11 M V . About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 58c h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: . • . �o s C s tc : L.AiI ciSCAQ 114 6 . s P, CE u)F` ia Ub-a oi.: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. AP1q(a C o MS St A1.- , vE* GIB M IssION 1S __ cMK - NtP-a1.1G,Z4.14,O 114 - .•.tt P 'at_'_ a'•, t • • _ Vii._ • \ \ \"- -V 1s51a -1S Bann aka -sC�' T ''F��• b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. AA Agency Comments 3. Water Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: L a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 'ML 1 1P 1 h , 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Y>= s 11. Cs3iN .1. p - w Bu t tia b, k t I W�► -a-- ' 1c t c Leom . 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments NIA O • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,. purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Q 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 6 b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Applicant Responses: 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: slo NE. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will,this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. .14 � ;. • . ! ! • etALV( \ kI' is CA - - o S p s. \50 &T. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ■0 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. CO 1 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: _11 uA 4 rn - WZ - s $ - Ntuk P I NU. Agency Comments ` Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspenkthe) Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Lcsr 014 PtNP_r_Vit.`` r 'rnnVE0 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Ut∎1tL1.law d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: lci 1A 'PLPv1S A.NTN ct —Rt■, W oLL: elk •• I. 1• Birds: Mammals is er Deer, b Bas • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: , beaver, other: out, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. U.11 K1.40w1A GAuwooti- Salino" c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N IAO 6vT 5i&E- `RF 14 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be _used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. to • • p Agency Comments X 1Ao • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1 '4 C3 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. 4\m t 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: - « \9L L w -- 'AYc; S\. La G A; Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise • • 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: . traffic, equipment, operation, other)? THE s l5 RusY NiZZA MtkiTAP < <AL i\UTh 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. at _ • r` ►_r .._. .: rb - kCk-V NIAOkS_S . C 5" kCRCr.1 : O\ A 4 -r` C nn P�o`c' '1 C. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Tam Goers u.2, 1A1O_ . k.kotWPs ?6 acKIMA • ,e_ 7 Ft4... -S DES16•1 1 Q,ti Gg5 Tektwt L . 8. . Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 014 k 1AG l T(v (Ti', l 1- ( . _ . Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 6 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? — 1 - CA e._VO L-Pc Vo?__,E=4\-\,4 6,7A-k 6-t-cA4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan desi nation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the , site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? :• 9111 ! t._! • ►l 6 _ ._• � -MW 13 - €; PPPeol-kh 2- r' fsh Pte. M .KY W o k - k < - t N - C A V 3 F f s c 1 - - V F r m N • i - A rn v % V\ c 4 r y j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: PsLI -ak' it 1 T 'lU r. ?,. n1 01. NI • B. 4 \A a I _. _►L� 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? •• :st, ! 4. _ 4. 1& • = • Agency Comments • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 2 2' A . b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? opt 1 4 fiZnPOSE.11 u 14 IS \kifl 1 (Sic? '56 �0��.15C1 �► 1 LZ1 s l PheE.-R . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: n M' 'S keEd5 Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? LA RE V5 (\Wig ,o, ot4 'ME T 0 ►PLC. 4 ►u - r 94\ek k V) A - fin -c k (NV T i- _ Vvl >= s in LULL. – 1, mt rvne . NJ? 1- 461A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? IQ • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: - FM—% w \ LL ikr mL `M.vtA mVZ A'Atf 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? �{ 1, imp. up - • ! !_ it■_ Wit – CO \ eN9Z,.VL.S . Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: b • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. L— i 'is\ QU∎SCVik c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. ,Show on site plans, if any. _ - U� �v . Qom, \I -E w ■-k-am • b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 1,.E -A T ri1 � �iP..A2__ 675. "Pf\e - E...) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? A E tAD - STN crq 5 to w -st"Pta..� 0 'Ns- 1_1 voe btM. Q. t ",3 \PARK! t4csS - uMt t C) . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 14 o e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. system other: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 1 r •t. 4110 ei Irk Nr. \ Amt - o r u? 3 F114,Ye ;oo- to:oo{?s, c�Q Laf\\) \ ta,G Okneit i •t r� PE'A!<- ke--= C r y V M711 A2 T \mss Oczwe.. . g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 'N MT . E. y,_.PE.c ,c 'Tb t'taV ,4k b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: septic Applicant Responses: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Date Submitted: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 1'1 ■ • +lu> i- CAS- mot tm40 i Ee6Y Q th sS' � tATTR- Cr p C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. N- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). Agency Comments • • 0.25mi 1 CityGIS Copyright (D2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. 11 • Um at rtirvitalrriartnc.titral neirrartrnrIlln+inIrdrqtxrlITC/l/f17vArilArtric,s, A b+rral Page 1 of 1 11A/11 /1(1(17 • • 4 N � Cit GIS 1 1000ft Copyright 02006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. Page 1 of 1 httrt•/ /mark ICcritalmarinPntra1 nnm /rwrnrinr• firm /Cifx7C;TC/Vn7rIr0 /inrlc + vA 11+m1 nA /11/1(1'17 I 100ft CityGIS 6.0 Copyright 02006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. ht-t„•/ /mark rlirritalmanrPntra1 rnm/nrnil1irtinn /('nraf :TCArcAr1 7(.f /inrlav html Page 1 of 1 Ill /1A/1(1(17 300ft N CityGIS 6.0 Copyright 02006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. hHrt• / /m .ar.e eli it g'nm /rwniliintinn/(`nro(3TC /mar 1 74f /;11 b html Page 1 of 1 Al/IA/1(1117 l� ThetCit.yit:i (au k wila express 4'n, ia�rTvth .f `+9�:p ; °`''+a f �'' and a ppreciati t0 'p ` AV,I 0 F n fi ln?, tik WIL IAM E BOEINCa'f'J foO eir, donation 0 f, easements wotho.UN ti Mich ry e . , 71.1.d:ff,a, .4 =' :�:•r -? t hisS . ttailaseCtion , couiif not 0 h 4veabo e n al'1441'4 ilt4 iii" + 1 Pl = ovom tiei, , „1.:..'.ptia !t a , r' � 4 ` . .� t : h4 , 1' 7 x l �t�! OYL�I ,U�Ypjd�rSEYirgq'HITN 2 3741SSeallte" stif • ; 1�6 � 324 ,Wa rrgton INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET # DESCRIPTION ISSUE FOR ISSUE FOR ISSUE FOR ISSUE FOR SITE PERMIT REVISION PRICING COORDINATION BID PERMIT RESUBMITTAL RADBJO AREA GENERAL BOLDING HECK 22' ERE AREA; 55.500 SF, OCCLPANCYTYPB 8 - MIT WANUFACtURING CCUTIRL CREN TTPB 58 TES SKIMMED. TES FIE ALARMS CWTICAL AREA AFFECTS W INN 200 OF SHORELINES EMMY CODE COIPL MOGB EIVEOPE CNREONENI Lxi0M WHIM POWER ALLOWANCE OCCLPAFR LAADB (2009 BC TABLE) COVER SHEET. PROJECT TEAM AND PROJECT INFORMATION 699 1C : 12.983 1 :100 130 2 3 2 TOTAL: 12,983 DO PAIWVIG REOUREMENTB PARR97G REAMER 12.983 S.F. NEW OFFICE 0 1:300 . 43 20,200 SF. EXISTING OFFICE 0 1:300 - 67 110 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REWIRED . 5 • TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED . 113 ACHE STALLS PRO*IDED . 9 PARCEL Y NEW PARING PROVICED . 56 TM GENERAL INFORMATION WATER =sus LAVATORSS DfWMmIG FOUNTAIN seem T1.2 ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES WOMEN URINALS RATIO NEN WOVEN 1 m) T1.3 EGRESS PLAN /ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 2 3 1 2 2 1/150. 1/500 DIMING 150 2 10TAL N/A TOTAL REO'D - 2 3 1 - CIVIL 2 0 0 TOTAL ROWED - C1 COVER SHEET 1 - 3 2 • 0 C2 DEMOLITION PLAN • C3 EROSION CONTROL • C4 GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN • C5 WEST STORM WATER VAULT • C6 EAST STORM WATER VAULT • C7 WATER AND SEWER PLAN • C8 NOTES AND DETAILS • LANDSCAPING L -1 LANDSCAPING PLAN • L -2 LANDSCAPING PLAN • L -3 IRRIGATION PLAN • L -4 IRRIGATION PLAN • ARCHITECTURAL A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN • A2.1 FLOOR PLAN • A2.2 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A2.3 FINISH PLAN A2.4 SECURITY COORDINA11ON PLAN A2.5 ROOF PLAN A3.1 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES A3.2 WALL DOOR. RECITE TYPES A3.3 WALL TYPES A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • A4.2 WALL SECTIONS A6.1 ENLARGED PLANS. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.2 ENLARGED PLANS. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7.1 STANDARD DETAILS A7.2 MILLWORK DETAILS A8.1 EXTERIOR DETAILS STRUCTURAL S2.1 STRUCTURAL. FOUNDATION PLAN S2.2 STRUCTURAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN S3.1 STRUCTURAL PANEL ELEVATIONS S4.1 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION DETAILS S4.2 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION DETAILS S5.1 STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAILS S5.2 STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAILS ELECTRICAL E0.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND E0.1 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES • E0.2 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES E1.0 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN • E1.1 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN • E2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN -POWER E2.2 ROOF PLAN -POWER E3.0 FIST FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING E6.0 ELECTRICAL - ONE LINE DIAGRAM E8.0 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS E8.1 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS MECHANICAL MO.0 MECHANICAL LEGEND MO.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - MECHANICAL M2.2 ROOF PLAN - MECHANICAL M6.0 MECHANICAL DETAILS M6.1 MECHANICAL. DETAILS PLUMBING P0.0 PLUMBING. LEGEND P0.1 PLUMBING. SCHEDULES P1.0 UNDERGROUND PLAN. PLUMBING P2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN. PLUMBING P2.2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN. PLUMBING P3.0 ENLARGED PLANS. PLUMBING P6.0 DETAILS. PLUMBING DOFF TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (RUC) NONE MAXIM &ADNO F63FITf 115' WSW W ALLOWABLE AREA* 19400 SF BASE ALLOWABLE PER TBLE 503 (B OCC. k BB CORM &F9WIOUS AREA; 5874 RADBJO AREA ENCLOSED BUILDING ARE& 12.983 Si. COVERED TRUCK LOADING ARE& 5,682 Si. TOOL AREA UNDER ROOF: 18,665 Si. BUILDING COVERAGE 340 (18.665 SF./55.500 S.F.) BOLDING HECK 22' ERE AREA; 55.500 SF, OCCLPANCYTYPB 8 - MIT WANUFACtURING CCUTIRL CREN TTPB 58 TES SKIMMED. TES FIE ALARMS CWTICAL AREA AFFECTS W INN 200 OF SHORELINES EMMY CODE COIPL MOGB EIVEOPE CNREONENI Lxi0M WHIM POWER ALLOWANCE OCCLPAFR LAADB (2009 BC TABLE) T0RA1 RA1O OCC. LOAD RW'D ECM PROVIDED ROM MAx'JVIF EXITS 699 1C : 12.983 1 :100 130 2 3 2 TOTAL: 12,983 DO PAIWVIG REOUREMENTB PARR97G REAMER 12.983 S.F. NEW OFFICE 0 1:300 . 43 20,200 SF. EXISTING OFFICE 0 1:300 - 67 110 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REWIRED . 5 PARKIN' PROVIDED: NEW OFFICE SOUS PROVIDED - 45 COSTING •FIGS PRO.1IWD - 68 TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED . 113 ACHE STALLS PRO*IDED . 9 PARCEL Y NEW PARING PROVICED . 56 PUBEINO MIRE REOLUEIe B OCCUPANCY WATER =sus LAVATORSS DfWMmIG FOUNTAIN seem RATIO MEN WOMEN URINALS RATIO NEN WOVEN 1 m) 54 S fiA 2 3 1 2 2 1/150. 1/500 DIMING 150 2 10TAL N/A TOTAL REO'D - 2 3 1 - 2 2 0 0 TOTAL ROWED - 3 3 1 - 3 2 0 0 WELLS FARGO CV OPERATIONS Tukwila, Washington SITE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL NOVEMBER 09, 2007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCT NEW SINGLE STORY BUILDING WITH ENCLOSED, PARTIALLY COVERED, TRUCK BAY. NEW CONSTRUCTION TO BE CONCRETE TILT -UP. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REINFORCED CONCRETE CAST -IN PLACE STRUCTURAL STEEL: FABRICATION ERECTION STEEL JOIST ERECTION STEEL DECKING STRUCTURAL STEEL EMBEDS IN CONCETE MECHANICAL ANCHOR INSTALLATION REINFORCED MASONRY: CMU, LEVEL 1 CMU, LEVEL 2 PROJECT INFORMATION PARCEL 'B': CO waLs BANK WELLS FARGO BANK VACANT T TuKWILA PARKING LOT S. 180TH DRIVE 6847 S. 180TH DR. TUKWILA, WA TUKWILA, WA TAX PARCEL # PARCEL 'E' 36- 23- 049095 PARCEL 'B' 36- 23- 049017 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 'E': 362304 95 PORS OF GL 4 & OF GL 1 IN SEC 35 LY S OF 1/16 LN EXTND DAF BEG AT NW COR OF SEC 36 TH S ALG W LN THOF 1355.89 FT TO TPOB & S MGN OF S 1 80TH ST TH ELY ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 02 -45-45 E RAD 336 FT C/A 01 -32-04 A DIST OF9 FTTOSLN OF N 36 FT OF SD GL 4 TH S 88 -46 -19 E ALL SD S LN 274.81 FT TH ON CRV RGT RAD 50 FT C/A 90 -00-00 A DIST OF 78.54 FT TH S 01 -13 -41 W 58 FT TH N 88 -46 -19 W TO SWLY LN OF CL 1 IN SEC 35 TH NWLY ALG SD SWLY LN TO WLY EXT OF N LN OF SD CL 4TH S 88 -46 -19 E ALG SD WLY EXT TAP 142.38 FT W OF NW COR SD GL 4TH ON CRV ITT CTR BRG N 27 -59 -36 E RAD 336 FT 147.96 FT TO TPOB TGW UND INT IN PRIVATE RD ADJ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES PARCEL 'B': 362304 17 POR OF GL 4 IN NW 1/4 BEG AT NW COR OF SEC TH S ALC W LN THOF 1355.89 FT TH ON CRV LFT CTR BRG N 02 -45-45 E RAD 336 FT C/A 01 - 32 - 04 A DIST OF 9 FT TO S LN OF N 36 FT OF SD CL TH S 88 -46 -19 ALG SD S LN 372.81 FT TH S 01 -13 -41 W 305 FT TO TPOB TH N 01 -13 -41 E 100 FT TH S 88 -46 -19 E 348.04 FT IA /L TO ELY BDY OF SD GL TH SLY AL.0 SD ELY BDRY TAP ERG S 88 -46 -19 E FR TPOB TH N B8 -46 -19 W 370 FT M/L TO WOO TGW UND INT IN PRIVATE RD ADJ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: FIRE ALARM & MONITORING SYSTEM DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, SIGNAGE WILL BE PROVIDED BY DESIGN /BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS PER IBC SEC. 106.3.4.2 CODE /ZONING INFORMATION GOVERNING BUILDING CODE: 2003 IBC (SEE SHEET 71.2 FOR COMPLETE UST) RECEIVED NOV 2 6 2001 DEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENT A PROJECT DIRECTORY ARCHITECT OF RECORD: CONTACT: JESSICA BRADLEY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE CLIENT: CONTACT: TOM DAWES GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTACT: KYLE FRY CONTACT: CRAIG ROYER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CONTACT: DOUG WILSON MEP ENGINEER: CONTACT: RBA WILSON CML ENGINEER: CONTACT: DAN BALMEII LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CONTACT: CORKY BROWN VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CRArr architects CRAFT ARCHITECTS, PLI.C. 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 408 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98101 P(206)720 -7001 F(206)720 -2949 KATHY CRAFT WELLS FARGO BANK CORPORATE PROPERTIES 999 THIRD AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98104 P(206)292 -3181 F(216)292-3475 POE CONSTRUCTION 1519 W VALLEY HWY N, SUITE 103 AUBURN, WASHINGTON 98001 P (253)833-2400 F (253)9394806 GEOTECHINICAL ENGINEER: 800 STEWART STREET, SUITE 1700 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 P (206)7282674 F (206)728 -2732 DCI ENGINEERS 3120 COLBY AVENUE, SUITE 100 EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98201 P(425)252-0454 9425)252 -1699 GLUMAC ENGINEERS 320 SW WASHINGTON ST, SUITE 200 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204,2840 P(503)227-5280 9503)274 -7674 BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS 18125 72ND AVENUE KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 P(425)251. 9425)251 WWJAM BROWN 16830 30TH DRIVE SE BOTHEL, WASHINGTON 98012-6083 9425)417.4809 F(425)486-1564 PROJECT LOCATION :_gig ; fa ompup000mPff I 1 8 11111 1 5 1 114111 1 /1 k i 12858 rigi191 Verq P FOL2Am th P0501 o6ht toe 84 5 11;1' PPM R�r ipi J shh 110 I hi ,1 ONO cgs - X ���ll � -T1Z1� 222 W 0000 0 ' hij Of. g 11 mgt 8 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PUNNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Drown JCR. Chockod Apponrd Dal. 8/'/07 *MORN 11 T441 m: il 9..1119'1 � OM 2 ;8 1 e g l 'MO il i 10 No g, #ijg lallY4 0 4 AI 1 1 imZI: 1 5 : 314 i EQ 1 cog i i iiii ii i'l 1 ; 1 g q't i Scohn 1b,+rontat Vertical N/A AT712sj Tkkyi'j For CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 No. Dots By F F - 4111114 ANDOVER F*5 .." PKWY E m 19 -8 4 ' 72nd AVE 5 Revision COVER SHEET WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATION TUKWILA, WASH. fie:P: \I 2000a \12858 \eng fng \12858 01.dwg Dote/Finle:11 /8/2007 10:51 AM ScaIe:1 -0" = Y - 0 ' _ %REF 8WOl1ASTON Kmf: , z12858- s.dwg, z12058 -tdwg, z12858 -b.d.g Fibre: \12000x \12858 \ engineering \12858 -N.dwy Oole/TIme:11 /8/2007 1052 NA Scale:l' -0" - I EIWOLtASTON X , z12858-t.dwg, x12858- x.dwg, 212858-b. we Hi I !IT 11 NayDtiO ��f .f 1� 1 1 Ii Revision 8 Job Plutedior 12858 Shed C2 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dino, — MIL Mooned _AS_ Me WAIN Illf lASC For CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 DEMOLTIION PLAN WELLS FARO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. IIPAIINNN WL11.i _ — p P P ! Y N o P Y Y N 511P N 11 1 ! 1! gisF 5 11 4 1-111: fp ioo g 11 PI : i! 2 4911 i! '14 >� � g z IR3 a 2 g � N 5 0 p v N P N. I. I . IApP. 1 o giPi 3 :POP PARA Lie! IIF 42 1 P P P ! Y N iP T, 0 p I qi ili1 gig l l iii ' I soe, l .x51 GGG B iN > goll viii i i i g ! 1 1111 ! z 111 91 ' las 4 gigli ig Idi 19 111 ; i ini ler Pp xi Ha 810 1 i i 1 l ii d li!! l h g! biil P P ! P P b y e 1 !fli r 1 I : 1 � �nnL p R i ilige ;11 Fyne g 1 i l�5agp{ f� F � � q �� < f� P g "' ial q != II : L; 6 1 x 5 4a g 1! m BE!gil iril g 1 i egl :' l 1 R q !! gl ° ri 0 1 1 1 i 1 NIP I � I if s II ! ill 0 1! 11 ; i41 8 g1 ; y x R.,1eie11 P 5 Job Number 12858 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENNRONMENTAL SERVICES Designed __AS_ brawn _erg. ot _AS_ ae. 3[27[27 For CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 TRW EROSION CONTROL PLAN WELLS FARGO — CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. lotP\ 2000 . \i2a58 \c,q6,..nny \r2ax - LAN P,te/T.me:I1 /9/200/ 10:5i AM Scaler' -0' = r- OXREJ ervrnuson X et: .:I2958- 1.d.., z12858-. dog. =12858 -b.doq 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CMI. ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dosign.d AS Dram _Bra Chocked Approved MB Data 5/22/07 Fib:P:\12000a \12850 \ engineering \12838 -G1 dwg Dolerlime:l1/8/2007 138 PM Scan:) -0 = I'-0 _iREF B'80ILASION x e1: , x12858- t.dwg, 02858-141N CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 x 12858-D.6rg Nn Dad. BY AAw• 8 -5 WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. ?„3 g 0 8 C) ° Z o C7 zit CD Z 8 �8Z D 0) m - v z s 2 T GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 'a 24' DIAMETER MANHOLE ACCESS ( CELL 2 55 CELL 2 ROT1OM OF HALL P 10.25 WEST STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS 0 PLAN VIEW SOME r.5• Spar WS,_ .205 — — — SECTION B-B BB 5 ■1O MOVABLE ORAE SCALE: 1'-0• N 1'.2' V STAINLESS PANEL IMOE OF OF STAIN ESS SPED.. MOOD, FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC E. 1550 T1 /S OF ONES APPROXIMATE PROPOSED GRADE CELL 1 CELL 1 7 1r DNYEIER VENT (11P.) ALL FOUR CORNERS NOT TO SCALE SECTION A -A SCALE: 1'■5 N 1'.2' FLOW RESTRICTOR RBI - WEST VAULT I a I hili i en Z Q O N CO Z Z CD E N G (1 Sin : I's N N - N m Y vv gi 2 CO L 3' • OUT P If OUT l 1462 i / / / //r //// / /i / /i / ////i v / ////i /7/. /ty CELL 2 BOT10M OF MALL EL■17.65 YIJL MS Elr2 EAST STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS Q DELL 2 CO MINABLE PANEL MADE OF STADDESS STEEL. M00D. FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC /// DELL 1 Qc es' PLAN VFW SCALE' 1 5210' REMOVABLE ORATE SECTION B-B SCALE: 1 R r-2' V _STATIC M&EL- 269 .. — . . — — — - — — — .. APPROXIMATE PROPOSED GRADE Ef.-221 BAFFLE DELL 1 Y \ 12 DIAMETER VENT (TV.) ALL FOUR CORNERS NOT 10 SCALE FLOW RESTRICTOR FUSER - EAST VAULT SECTION A -A SCM.0 1•-5' N 1•-2' V A a) c; H i 0 5 rn I co U Fib:P:\ 12009, \12558 \ergfneoring \12838 N5.d'9 Dale/11ma:1 /8/2007 4:44 PM Scale:I -0" - 1 --0 XRE1 OBOLSTAD Xrei: , :1285840wg, .I2858--.4g. :12858 -0.0wg S 8 rn r m ° � tst- Z 5 0 nn rn r Z 0 0 2 M, 1 -_ N/a \O. K V E6A , I .'� °� ii.1 �•7 11-, �>z Q 'F ,° �� - S70NAl10E4'1.`� � • CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 901V1 98101 Na Mt* WATER AND SEWER PLAN WELLS FARGO — CV OPERATIONS � 1V TUKWILA, WASH. Job N nDi 12858 G � Ad Z I � � =1f spa ' �' p 0' � r 4. eno00- 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (4 25)251 -8782 FAX N D PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND , SURVEYING. ENVIRDNr1EENrrAi SERVICES i�� l�� Poet C7 8 of Fib:P:\ 12009, \12558 \ergfneoring \12838 N5.d'9 Dale/11ma:1 /8/2007 4:44 PM Scale:I -0" - 1 --0 XRE1 OBOLSTAD Xrei: , :1285840wg, .I2858--.4g. :12858 -0.0wg S 8 rn r m ° � tst- Z 5 0 nn rn r Z 0 0 2 fr fY r + i 9 p 16, vitoso n, f Li1 ; N' §„{� F ! ;i ; 1 .1, i % g r it o opt; ; BIN,Aa i b 11 1 i iii il Plirri1 i ?c,! ' i il I i :1; 1 pg I ! i i : : li i ! 8 > ii; lie g s g 1 11 i I N; al l till 1 RA i i lifi l m 'i i 1 i i t cg'/11 i i 1 . U ..bb Number 12858 N 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251 -6222 (425)251 -8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PUNNING, y11RVE71 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES = gP; Y' f Y N �•' ;; -:,,; I m 4 o 1 11 hgl g I 1 : ; 1 r j 1 4 MA 8Mg e 1 11 i 1r,K Y LL��jjN 7I p n P r Oniwwd Orme _BLS Approved cNaked oate Agin/ I 1.1 F ; g :1 1, 11 ;! Igo! IN I- g:! 11 8 !.b a l F Ri Ett � � iiF � ego I �j � X 1� N 1R >� � i � � Z ' I I g q m 41 h y iR ' 15. gi 01 ; igc, 0 r ; 4i Oil 110:6 »t 114 8 CRAFT ARCHITECTS 1932 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 405 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 s MI I h 11 Fel !,4 1 1 1 g i l l u 511 1 No � Dete By � Ckci. i NP. Rotelon CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS WELLS FARGO - CV OPERATIONS TUKWILA, WASH. 0 0 z C 0 z z z 0 0 m D r C8,, 8 File.P: \120001 \ 8 \en neerhy \12858- 01.dog Dated :n/8/2007 10.47 AM Seale - sWDwSTOI X,eI 120 -Dd'g PROPOSED BUILDING PARCEL "E" (5) 2 -3 MAN WEATHERED GRANITE OUTCROP PEP GRAVEL PATH W CONCRETE CURB 10;°" 0°0^0000°',0,0 1°1.f."1 1 ?' NMI I114A1111111111A111i1111w11111111Q16111MMIl♦ APPROX. LIMIT OF DRIPUNE PRUNE BACK TO TRUNK ANY BRANCHES CLOSER THEN 6 TO TOP OF FENCE. PEA GRAVEL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 . WITH (3) 4 MAN AND (8) 2 -3 MAN WEATHERED GRANITE LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ARCHITECT. PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME TREES ACER GRISEUM / PAPER BARK MAPLE GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD' / AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO ACER RUBRUIA 'ARMSTRONG' / COULMNAR RED MAPLE ACER X FREEHAND 'JEFFERSRED' / AUTUMN BALZE MAPLE CER MACROPHYLLUM / BIG LEAF MAPLE BETULA PAPYRIFERA / PAPER BIRCH ACER CIRONATUM / NNE MAPLE THUJA PUCATA / WESTERN RED CEDAR SHRUBS CISIUS X PURPUREUS / ORCHID ROCKROSE TAXUS 'DARK GREEN SPREADER' / SPREADING YEW BERBERIS THUNBERGU 'AUREA' / GOLDEN BARBERRY BERBERIS T. 'CRIMSON PYGMY / CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY POTENTALA FRUTICOSA 'ABBOSTSWOOD' / CINQUEFOIL SPIRAEA 'MAGIC CARPET / MAGIC CARPET SPIREA NANDINA DOMESRCA 'MOON BAY / MOON BAY HEAVENLLY BAMBOO LEUCOTHOE FDNTANESANA 'SCARLETTA' / DROOPING LEUCOTHOE MAHONIA AQUIFODUM 'COMPACTA' / OREGON GRAPE CORNUS STOLONIFERA / REDTWIG DOGWOOD RUBUS SPECTABIUS / SALMONBERRY PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS / NINEBARK SYMPHORICARPOS ALBA / SNOWBERRY CORNUS STOLONIFERA 'KELSEYI' / DWARF REDTWIG DOGWOOD PERENNIALS / GRASSES / FERNS EUPHORBIA CHARACIAS 'WULFENII' / EUPHORBIA PHORMIUM TENAX 'JACK SPRAT!" / DWARF NEW ZEALAND FLAX HEUCTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS / BLUE OAT GRASS POLYSTICUM MUNITUM / WESTERN SWORD FERN GROUNDCOVER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA -URSI / KINNIKINNICK FRAGARIA CHILOENSIS / BEACH STRAWBERRY LAWN EMERGENTS 75% JUNCOS ENSIFOLIUS / COMMON RUSH 25% SORPUS MICROCARPUS / SMALL- FRUITED BULRUSH 2" CAL 2' CAL 2' CAL 2" CAL 2' CAL 2' CAL 2' CAL 8' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18" HT. MIN. 18" HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. IAN. 18' HT. IAN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. MIN. 18' HT. GAL GAL GAL GAL 1 GAL 4' POT SOD SOD 4' POT 4" POT B&B B89 B&B B&8`, B&B BARB BAR CONT., 4' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' D.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 4' O.C. CONT., 4' O.C. CONT., 4' D.C. CONT., 4' D.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT, 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT., 3' O.C. CONT. 24' O.C. 12' O.C. 12' D.C. 12' O.C. C 112 LEGEND TREE TYP ` pCAUPER DBH j P EXIS NG TREES TO`REMAIN ■ j NORWAY MAPLE M M AUSTRIAN BLACK PINE D DECD B. PAPER BIRCH • T TULIP TREE TO BE REMOVED C. COTTONWOOD cbC WEATHERED GRANITE (REFER TO LANDSCAPE NOTES) WASHD RIVER ROCK MIN. 6" DEPTH PEA RAVEL MIN. 4" DEPTH 00511pIG LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. 2 -3 MAN WEATHERE6 GRANITE (TYP.) nor ^ itI ^OO�1∎01, - -- ?Spo QJO n... X00 > DRY RIVER BED LANDSCAPE PLAN SIGN MONUMENT' Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle, WA 98101 206 720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 i www.crattarchitectt.com CONSULTANT L A jtinePl1�BaAte -- y. » 16693 Both Ce. SE. BMWS WA 88012 slam I® 417-4609 tat 149 488-166 ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA SHORELJNES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Rodedon Sheet 1NIee ar4a•a•e=1 LANDSCAPE PLAN Dote 5/23/07 MAW ED Drover: CB ProJeet No: 746.00 Approlle& CB 0rpd Mob" YDOz lode atteer am...kJ W s.8sae SW* lics L -1 e0 V ,07 ,.6 -.L0 BARK MULCH EDGE OF BED . ` Y 7 r OA O►04 0000oe.40O'1000 000000. 000% 00000e4 r04004000'0i0000000o00,0,00 ai0o∎ O 000OCO000�00p°° 00400,00 40000O00oO000O0 0 O,O 000 OOOO.G, .aoOo ooloo00. 400'0'00 :i000000,00000000'0000'0;0� ! 00 SPERRY'1BUILDING PARCO,L "A" 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 GROUND COVER SPACING PIS t i t o + �W1 1 `411C 4 / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ 4014 :: 4,luj *II, CURB OR HEADER NOTE SPACING TO BE TRIANG. PER DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLANT SCHEDULE EEL IIIIII EMA _ IIIIII= 11IW— unnIII =IIII III =IIIIII = IIIIII E IIIIII= IIIIII —Iola =IIIIII IIIIII- IIIIIIJIIIII -IIIIII - IIIIII = IIIIII =IIII IIIIII-IN SHRUB PLANTING Nrs SET CROWN AT NURSERY HEIGHT BARK MULCH PER SPECS BACKFILL TO CONSIST OF TOPSOIL PER SPECS. ADD FERTILIZER PER SPECS SCARIFY ROOTBALL ON CONTAINER MATERIAL REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIAL PLANT TREES HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLOW POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ROOTBALL O DECIDUOUS TREE STAKING MIS 1 PIT TO BE 2X LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 " = 2O' -0" SECURE TRUNK WNTH DOUBLE STRAND OF 14 GAUGE GALV. WIRE WRAPPED IN CLEAR VINYL TWIST TIGHT 2' DIA "BVC' LODGEPOLE PINE TREE STAKES WITH 6' CONICAL POINT 36' DIA. TREE WELLS IN LAWN AREAS. FILL NTH 2' OF SPECIFIED MULCH REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. LOO WIRE BASKETS BACKFILL PIT WITH 50% TOPSOIL AND 50% NATIVE SOIL ADD SPECIFIED FERTIUZER TO MIX LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB ALL EXISTING BED AREAS SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW LANDSCAPE 2. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS AND WITHIN PARKING LOT TO BE SET AT 8' MINUS FINISH ELEVATION EXCEPT AS NOTED. THESE AREAS TO RECEIVE IMPORTED TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8'. ROTOTILLED THOROUGHLLY INTO SUBGRADE. ALL EXISTING BEDS THAT ARE SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW PLANTING TO BE PIT PLANTED WITH A 50 /50 MIX OF EXISTING SUBGRADE AND IMPORTED TOPSOIL 3. ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE FINE BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2'. EXISTING BEDS TO BE MULCHED AS NOTED. 4 ALL PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN SELECTED TO BE DROUGHT TOLERANT. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WATERING AS REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY OWNER. 5 GROUND COVER TO EXTEND UNDER ALL DECIDUOUS TREE CANOPIES AT THE SPECIFIED SPACING TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE IN ALL PLANTING BEDS DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE GROUND COVER. GROUNDCOVER BENEATH EVERGREEN TREES TO BE MAINTAIN A 3' CLEARANCE FROM BASE OF TRUNK. 6. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARE BASED ON THE SITE PLANS PREPARED BY CRAFT ARCHITECTS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO THE SITE PLANS WHICH MAY REQUIRE ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN. 7 REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT THE HEALTH OF PLANT MATERIAL 8 NO PRE - EMERGENT HERBICIDES TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SITE DURING THE FIRST YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. 9 HIGH CASCADES GRANITE BOULDERS TO BE PLACED IN PLANTING BEDS AS NOTED. BOULDERS TO BE SET INTO THE SUBGADE AND POSTIONED THAT ALL EXPOSED SIDES OF THE BOULDER SLOPES DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF BOULDER. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE ARE AVAILABLE AT MARENAKO'S ROCK CENTER PRESTON, WASHINGTON. PHONE (425 - 392 -3313) WASHED RIVER ROCK 1 -6' DIA TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 4' CONCRETE WALK CRUSHED SUBBASE FOR WALK NOTE ROCK OUTCROP TO CONSIST OF WEATHERED GRANITE 2 -3 MAN SET ROCK WITH ALL EXPOSED SIDES SLOPING OUT AND AWAY FROM TOP OF ROC( O ROCK OUTCROP DETAIL NISI CONCRETE CURB ASPHALT PAVING ISLAND PLANTING DETAIL Nrs ROCKS TO BE SET FIRM AND WITHIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE AN APPROX. 1/3 OF THE ROCK MASS TO BE SET BELOW GRADE FOR SETTING ROCK. REMOVE ADDITIONAL ASPHALT AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL IRRIGATION HEADS ADJACENT TO CURB ESTABUSH CROWN AS INDICATED SOD OR MULCH PER PLAN ..__- - 5% SOD-0' MULCH -1' IMPORT TOPSOIL AS SPECIFIED REMOVE CRUSHED TOP COURSE AS INDICATED. SCARIFY EXISTING SUBGRADE TO DEPTH OF 6' AND BACKFILL WITH IMPORT TOPSOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS CRUSHED TOP COURSE a r c h C Rfin i t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 p hone 206.720.2949 f www.craftarchltects.com z CO (n O Z z p o co U' P Q rn LLI LI- CI-O O (n � J o CO W CO CONSULTANT Site Pfd Irrigation 166909Dm @.88 Bothell, WA 98012 Itc eWS417-4809 fa 14=488 -166 ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA /SHORELJNES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Retaken Sheet Mk OO sI baslq b >1S s 7N L -2 a0l•101r L XISCAPE PLAN Dat& 5/18/07 Ds Q3 Draw OR Project Ills 746.00 APProaad fe Sleet N Im S/S9/0 74-US IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION P.S.I. RAD. G.P.M. 1 CLASS 200 RAIN BIRD 1812 - SAM- MP3000 360, 12' POP -UP ROTOR 1 -1/4" CLASS 200 30' OO 0040 <NCl�OOO OOCJ RAIN BIRD 1812 - SAM- MP3000 90 -210, 12' POP -UP ROTOR 30' RAIN BIRD 1812 - SAM- MP3000 90 -210, 12" POP -UP ROTOR 30' RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP2000 360, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 22' RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP2000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 22' RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM- MP2000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 22' RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM- MP1000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 14.5' RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM- MP1000 90 -210, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 14.5' RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM -1AP CORNER, 6' POP -UP SPRAY 14.5' RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM -14P SIDE STRIP, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 5'X30' RAIN BIRD 1806 - SAM -MP RIGHT STRIP, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 5'X15' RAIN BIRD 1806- SAM -1AP LEFT STRIP, 6" POP -UP SPRAY 5'X15' RAIN BIRD 1804 -SAM (NOZZLE AS NOTED ABOVE), 4" POP -UP SPRAY 1' IRRIGATION METER (REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS) POINT OF CONNECTION : 1 1 -1/2" BRASS GATE VALVE 1 FEBCO ROSY, 1 -1/2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY 1 1" RAINBIRD 44RC, 1" WICK COUPLING VALVE ZONE NUMBER 1 RAINBIRD 150 PEB, 1 -1/2" MASTER VALVE 1 RAIN BIRD 100- PEB -PRS, 1' REMOTE CONTROL VALVE t G.P.M. Ea VALVE RAIN BIRD XCZ- 075 -PRF, 3/4" DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT RAIN BIRD EMT -6XERL DRIP 6 OUTLET MANIFOLD SIZE RAIN BIRD ESP -12MC, FOUR PROGRAM HYBRID CONTROLLER WALL MOUNT W/ RAIN BIRD WRSC, WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR 1 1/2" MAINUNE, SCHEDULE 40 PVC CLASS 200 PVC LATERAL UNE (SIZE PER PIPE SIZING TABLE) 4" SLEEVING, SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE SIZING TABLE PIPE SIZE MAX G.P.M. 3 ,'4" CLASS 200 UP TO 10 C.P.M. 1 CLASS 200 UP TO 16 G.P.M. 1 -1/4" CLASS 200 UP TO 26 G.P.M. I I, i n umpomplommeimm tl' iJrt.FFwFF '�" n�► I + +;51iw :wlM1 S•64i IkInii l��ii HAND TRENCH FOR MAINUNE IN THESE AREA. TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN \ HAND TRENCH WITHIN DRIPUNE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. ■ IRRIGATION NOTES c 1. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMM OF WORK. PROTECT ALL NEW AND EXISTING UIIUTIES. PROMPTLY N THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN PROPOSED WORK" AND OBSTRUCTIONS / 2. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY, F� PERSONS, WORK IN PROGRESS, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, WALKS, CURBS, PAVED SURFACES AND EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO REMAIN DURING THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORK. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK AND PROTECT SAID U1ILI1IES. 3. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND FEES AS REQUIRED BY APPUCABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES FOR THIS WORK. ALL WORK TO BE INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS AND MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS. 4. PRESSURIZE MAINUNE TO 100 PSI FOR A PERIOD OF 2 HOURS CHECK ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS FOR LEAKS AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE WRIITEN DOCUMENTATION THAT A PRESSURE TEST HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITH NO MORE THAN 5 PSI LOSS DURING THE TEST DURATION. 5. UPON THE COMPLETION OF IRRIGATION WORK, OPERATE THE SYSTEM IN THE PRESENCE OF THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE ADJUST AS REQUIRED. 6. GUARANTEE ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR COMMENCING AT THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THIS GUARANTEE DOES NOT APPLY TO WORK OR DAMAGE DONE TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM BY OTHERS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 7. PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A SET OF CLEARLY DRAWN REPRODUCIBLE RECORD DRAWINGS SHOWING ACTUAL LOCATION AND TYPE OF IRRIGATION ELEMENTS INSTALLED. 113 1" S 180TH ST. DRY RIVER BED IRRIGATION PLAN = 20' -0" POINT OF CONNECTION LLJ CC I1 LU 1 LJ If) Z I. a r c h i t e c t s CRAM Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 40B Seattle. WA 98101 206.7 7 20.001 pphone 206.720.2949 laz www.crattarchltects.com Z m No O 00 (2 o r Q L CL CD O Ln J U CO LLJ UD CONSULTANT Lerebeete Architecture L A J LYIe Relating Height= 16690 Beth Dr. S.E. Botha, WA 98012 phone 8479 417-4609 to M6486-155 ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA /SHORELINES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Rations Sheet i i�4lr91ra1 0 RITIGATKIN PLAN Dots 5/23/07 Dee1Pn CB Drawn CB Project Nrc 746.00 Approve* C9 O dieski Y !r a Ir. Seth .two mmlldr R keel Sheet Ike L- 3 YID S/99 /07 P6 O 1 SPERRY'1BUILDING PARC "A" 1 1 Ed TY 1 L 1 w C") ■ GATE VALVE MAIN SHUT OFF NOTE 1. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2. ALL PIPE AND FITTNGS WITHIN VAULT TO BE ONE SIZE LARGER THEN COMPONENTS. USE REDUCING BUSHINGS. 3. TEST COCKS SHALL HAVE 12" CLEARANCE POINT OF CONNECTION NTS WILKENS P.R.V. IF REQUIRED. - DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY QUICK COUPLER VALVE VALVE BOX. REFER TO NOTE /5 - MASTER VALVE WASHED DRAIN ROCK MINIMUM 12" DEPTH (TYP.) FLOW 4. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH CITY OF EVERETT STANDARDS. REVIEW CURRENT CITY STANDARDS FOR REVISIONS. 5. FOR 3/4' & i' DEVICES, CARSON JUMBO BOXES FOR 1-1/2" & 2 DEVICES, INSTALL FOG THE /2 REINFORCED CONCRETE BOXES FINISHED GRADE BEFORE MULCH /SOD 1' ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3M DRY SPUCE CONNECTORS PROVIDE FOR A 18" EXPANSION LOOP OF EXCESS WIRE. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE PLASTIC ISOLATION BALL VALVE SAME SIZE AS CONTROL VALVE CARSON STANDARD VALVE BOX FOR 1" OR 1 -1/4" VALVES CARSON JUMBO VALVE BOX FOR 1 -1/2" OR 2" VALVES VAULT TO EXTEND MIN. 6" BELOW VALVE. USE EXTENSIONS AS NEEDED. MASONARY UNIT SUPPORT AT CORNERS SCH 40 PVC MAINLINE PEA GRAVEL MIN. 3' DEPTH NOTE: 1. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS WITHIN VAULT TO BE SCH 40 PVC SAME SIZE AS OUTLET LATERAL PIPE. 3. PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE CONNECTION IN VALVE BOX. 4. COMPACT SOIL AROUND VALVE BOX TO SAME DENSITY AS UNDISTURBED ADJACENT SOIL ■ ■ IRRIGATION PLAN = 2O' -0' 1 COMPACT SUBGRADE PER BACKFILL & TRENCHING SPECIFICATIONS PAVING NTS AS SPECIFIED I BACKFILL PVC SCH. 40 SLEEVING IAN. 2X DIA OF ENCLOSED PIPE 2" PVC SCH. 40 WIRE SLEEVE NOTE: BACKFILL TO BE FREE OF ROCK OR DEBRIS LARGER THAN 1" DIA ABSOLUTELY NO ROCK OR DEBRIS SHALL , BE PLACED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO ANY PIPE O REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 10 SIEVING & TRENCHING DETAIL NM III - 11111= 1111i•• 111111- 111111 ���= 111111= =111111 = 111111= 111111 - 111111 111= 111111= mom • — Maw TOPSOIL PVC LATERAL PVC MAIN VALVE WIRING FINISHED GRADE SET POP -UP SPRINKLER FLUSH NTH FINISH GRADE POP -UP SPRINKLER HEAD. REFER TO IRRIGATION SCHEDULE FOR NOZZLE AND BODY TYPE. USE BOTTOM INLET ONLY. POLY PIPE 30' MAX. LENGTH SCH 40 PVC FITTINGS, TYP. MARLEX STREET ELL AND SWING PIPE 90 LATERAL TIP. SIZE AS INDICATED ON PLAN MARLEX STREET Ell AND SWING PIPE 90 NOTE: 1. USE BOTTOM INLET ONLY. 2. POLY PIPE TP BE USED FOR SPRAY HEADS ONLY. ROTORS AND MP ROTATOR HEADS SHALL USE A TRIPLE SWING ASSEMBLY. 3. HEADS TO BE SET PERPENDICULAR WITH SLOPE. O POP -UP SPRAY HEAD IRS FINISHED GRADE BEFORE MULCH /SOD 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE CARSON 10" ROUND VAULT WITH LOCKING UD QUICK COUPLER VALVE SET A MINIMUM 2" CLEAR BELOW TOP OF VAULT. STEEL 'T FENCE POST, 36' LENGTH SS HOSE CLAMP (2) SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE SCH 40 PVC ST ELL & 90 DEG. ELL SCH 40 PVC ST. ELL SCH 80 PVC NIPPLE, 1" X SCH 40 PVC MAIN UNE NOTE 1. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2. VALVE TO BE SET PLUM & CENTERED IN VALVE BOX. 3. PROVIDE DRAIN ROCK TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6'. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (1) EACH DCV KEY AND SWIVEL HOSE ELL O QUICK COUPLER VALVE 12" LENGTH C a r c h i t e c t s Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 tax www.crattarehitects.com CONSULTANT Landscape Arcintsetnee 1889D 80th Dr.= Bathe &WA 88012 penes Wen 417-4809 fax ( 4 4 8 B - 125) ISSUE 05.09.07 FOR COORDINATION 05.25.07 SEPA /SHORELINES 06.08.07 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 11.09.07 S.P.R. COMMENTS Meet Ms Q m U) O z 0 o ro � F 0 Ct �0 0 OU) � LJ_1 IRR1GATICN PLAN Data 5/18/07 MOP OR Dom l8 Project Na 746.00 Approve& CB O�►d Atlbg Y )rai1r. Seelutlik aeeenlmh K tAse Meet Ns L - 4 Im 5/09/07 746 -A10 TOE OF SLOPE - TOP OF LEVY Massa rts¢ GREEN MYER 0 0 n t o • 0 ® ENLARGED PLAN 1/8'•1 -0' 01 2 5 �vS u.oaysw ird -u1. u= .TV � ith;u¢ - i s , - §rdLara,x!�,s' §,?'§ . art'ke' uFrati gitAaA, 10' -0' 14 -0 / '6 -O' 32' - +1 66' - 6' 10 4M4 _ HIGH WATER � ' w ,;<i,rtw5aFa2tarn'sYfr a : g .3 ie,ssarawrt'r,+'..nviel, MARK °u_r'°ur 'S r a '.a.E' §,p9re A,i?AN'4 7ANA,4'47 iA,4'4s4W,4r4,4Wi44,i<'4,'A � nub Fui ,-;;4' -6' / () ARCHITECTURAL SITE SECTION 2 1/18' - 1.-0• 02 4 to 2e 9' -0 +41' L T.O. CMU WALL 7= GROUND • 13 , IL 0 EXISTING BUILDING ■ ■ PARCEL 'D" FENCED COVERED TURN - AROUND TRUCK LOADING S 180TH ST PROPOSED BUILDING PARCEL "E" i �• 1:1•1:111=111111 FIRE LANE « ��© 1111 II I 1111 II EXISTING BUILDING - SPERRY PARCEL "A" UTILITY EASEMENT 1111111110711 PARCEL "B" PHASE 2. PARKING LOT 56 PARKING STALLS SOW/ 0 0 0 0 0 KEY NOTES: EXIST. CHAIN UNK FENCE TO REMAIN, EXTEND BOTTOM OF FENCE 18' BELOW GROUND (ANCHORED AT BASE). ADD PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER. NEW 8' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK VINYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER TO MATCH EXISTING, EXTEND BOTTOM OF FENCE 18' BELOW GROUND (ANCHORED AT BASE). O3 NEW 10' HIGH ELECT. ROWNG GATE WITH INTERWOVEN SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, REMOTE OPERATION NEW 10' -0' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK VINYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, ANCHORED AT BASE NEW CHAIN UNK GATE W/ LOCK EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO IMAIN. NEW LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION RESEAL & RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING NEW ASPHALT, EXTRUDED CURB & STRIPING COMM SIDEWALK TO REMAIN NEW CONC. SIDEWALK W/ BROOM FINISH & 5' SCORING PATTERN NEW PEA GRAVEL PTD STEEL, CONC. FILLED BOLLARDS REFER ALSO TO DETAIL 14/8.1. NEW ENTRY PEDESTAL (INTERCOM) NEW 10' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE BLACK VINYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER AND INTERWOVEN SLATS, ANCHORED AT BASE WATER AND IRRIGATION MLItHS TRANSFORMER; REFER TO A2.1 FOR PAD INFORMATION. GENERATOR; REFER TO A2.1 FOR PAD INFORMATION. GAS METER. LOCATE TO READ METER THROUGH FENCE. ALL EXPOSED PIPING TO BE LOCATED BEHIND FENCE. SOW AM PARCEL "C" GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROPOSED BUILDING AND SURROUNDING SITE WILL NOT HAVE ANY NEW SIGNAGE ® NEW CURB RAMP PER 406 ON SHEET T1.2 AND DETAILS 17 & 18/A8.1. O NEW SIGNAGE PER 502/503 ON SHEET 71.2 AND DETAIL 16 /AILI • • • • • • • • 0 0 • VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL PER 502 /503 ON SHEET T1.2 CAR ACCESSIBLE STALL PER 502 /503 ON SHEET T1.2 ACCESS AISLE PER 502 /503 ON SHEET T1.2 MAIN ENTRANCE NEW BIKE RACK. DOUBLE BEND. CAPACITY (4). STANDARD PARKING STALL NEW CONC. PAD NEW 10' -0' HIGH STEEL ORNAMENTAL FENCE, BLACK NEW STEEL ORNAMENTAL GATE, BLACK W /LOCK NEW ASPHALT PATHWAY 5 -0' WIDE. 5-0' FROM FENCE NEW STRIPING ON ASPHALT FOR PEDESTRIAN PATH 1 it ' () ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN r • 40• 05 10 20 40 7 c 117A qt.. 'i` iY • a r c h i t e c t s • CrVirr Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 40B Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 tax www.erartarchltects.com CONSULTANT arrsrsv� m 8 LL p U � CQCOPYPoriiT CRAFT ALTCF11EC18 2007. 11131E DOCUMENI8 MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITH OUT WPM WRITTEN PERVSS0N BY CRAFT ARCH1ECTB OR WELLS FARGO. ISSUE 1109.07 SITE TTTAL Revisions: Sheet Title: Dote: Design: Drown: Project No. Approved: Original drawing is 24 • 35. Scale entities accordingly if reduced Sheet No: ARCHTECTURAL SITE PLAN 11/09/07 JAKB MLR,SN 746.00 KC A1.0 COPyAC 1 CRAFT ARCHITECTS 2007 60' -0• KEY NOTES: OI P-LAM COUNTER W/ BASE & UPPER CABINETS 0 34' A.F.F., TYP. O P -LAM COUNTER 0 36' AF.F., TIP. REFER TO SHEET A7.2, DETAIL 18 OPEN WORK AREA TYP., FURNNURE F.0.1.0 ROOF HATCH & PTD. STEEL LADDER PLASTIC LAMINATE STORAGE CABINETS, 7' -0' H LOCKERS -LYON, 12 * w x 16 d, 2 -1IER, RD OR SIMILAR, STANDARD AKD PAINT COLOR, FCIC 1 LOCKERS -LYON, 12'w x 24'd, FULL-HT., FCIC 8 RELTIE, TYP. REFER TO DOOR AND RELIT" SCHEDULE ON SHT A3.1. SEE 10,11/A3.2 FOR DETAILS. 4 MODULAR 6 SIDED VAULT, PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER b PTD. WD DOOR W/ HM FRAME, TYP. SEE SCHEDULE ON SHT A3.1 AND DETAILS ON SHT A3.2 NOT IN USE CATCH BASIN W/ OIL WATER SEPARATOR PER CML 12' CONTINUOUS WALL BUMPERS, MTD 0 30' AFF, TO BOTTOM, THIS WALL U.N.O., FCIC WAINSCOT, THIS WALL U.N.O. - REFER TO 69/A7.2 FOR DETAILS. 4' -0' HIGH STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARD 4' -0' HIGH STAINLESS STEEL WRAP FULL-HT. GYM OVER HAT CHANNEL, WRAP. FULL HT. ADJ. SHELVING, REFER TO 5/A7.2 MOP SINK WALL MOUNT 26' TELEVISION, FOC FULL-SIZE REFER. WITH ICE MAKER BY GEN. ELEC. OR EQUAL, FCIC 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' and sonnummtinnuov 1. .�Iwu u.Aaruk IU! l V IlIr - 1 i . iI U CDs:, Ex! �, 3 -9 1 165' -0' 2000 WATT MICRO, FCIC VENDING MACHINE. F010 WATER COOLER, F010 FURNISH & INSTALL 3/4' PTD. F RE -RATED PLYWOOD ON ALL WALLS I 31 STAINLESS STEEL COUNTER 0 36' AFF WALL MOUNTED HOOKS U.C. REFRIGERATOR, FCIC GARBAGE DISPOSAL, FCIC. P LAM SIGN -IN COUNTER: 34' H AIR SPACE BETWEEN EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANEL AND INTERIOR MODULAR VAULT PANEL TACK BOARD: 48 W, ALUMINUM FRAME WHITE BOARD: 48' W, ALUMINUM FRAME DOCUMENTS PASS - THROUGH TRAY, 16' W. LOCATION OF RED /GREEN 'ALL SAFE' LIGHTS WALL MOUNTED ABOVE DOOR ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PER CML & MEP, ON CONCRETE PAD BACK UP GENERATOR PER MEP, ON CONCRETE PAD. BOLLARDS, TYPICAL (4) 4' PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALL, 12' ABOVE CEILING. PROVIDE AND INSTALL HOOKS FOR HANGING COUMER BAGS - (4) WALL MOUNTED HOOKS MOUNTED TO 1 X4 BOARD, MOUNTED TO WALL AT 36 AFF. PAINT TO MATCH WALL COLOR. 0 4 6 1. ALL COSTING COLUMN, EXTERIOR WALLS, WINDOWS, AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TO REMAIN. 2. ALL NEW PARTITION WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE U.O.N. REFER TO A3.3 FOR WALL TYPES. 3. FOR EGRESS AND ACCESSIBIUTY COMPUANCE REFER TO SHEET 71.3 4. SEE A6.1 & A6.2 FOR ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS. 5. PROVIDE AND INSTALL SHEET METAL BACKING (6' WIDE 20 GAUGE FLAT STRAP) AT ALL WALL MOUNTED ELEMENTS. (EQUIPMENT, CASEWORK, ETC.) LEGEND NEW WALL HOSE BIBB FLOOR DRAIN 16 FT 11 Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 408 Seattle. WA 98101 206.720.700 phone 206.720.2949 fat www.craftarchltects.com rrrrrrma SIM - NO CEILNG .MDF/IDF ® 102 Ti'' a 4' -0' 3'- 3 "6' - 5 1/2 12' -0 1/2' 12 " -10 3/4' 11' -0' 10' -3 1 12' -5' 1/ 1 -l LOO ® Qi C ' rMEN' j6iI MEN'S r • Ir M ' 11 ; 0 Q 118 0 El II K: >•II0O • Fili l° ;■ e 117 � 12' -5' 12 " -10' 20' -6' 3Y -1o' Sheet Title: Date: Design: Drown: Y. CRAFT YE •F WASHINGTON hZ z Q me LiFp frZ Q 3 LL Q f M>. m CQCOPYROHT CRAFT ARCHRECTS 2007. THESE DOCUMENTS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITH OUT BMW S WRITTEN PE N BY CRAFT ARCHITECTS OR WELD -8 FAROO. ISSUE 11.09.07 BITE RESUBNITTTAL Revisions: Project No: Approved: Original drawing is 24 it 36'. Scale entities accordingly 'A reduced A2.1 Sheet No: COPfRNM CRAFT IJlCHIlECTS 2007 19/08/07 JAKB MLR,SN 748.00 KC KEY NOTES O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • 19 NEW SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DRIVE -IN DOOR NEW HM MANDOOR W/ STEEL FRAME, TYP PAINTED TILT -UP CONC. PANEL, TYP. PANEL JOINT, TIP. FUTURE KNOCK OUT, TYP. PAINTED MTh COPING 1/2' DEEP REVEAL, TYP FORMED IN 3' -0 3' -0' GRID 6' HIGH PTD. MIL TOP CAP PRECAST CONC. TOP CAP KLA -ALL BRICK WALL 4'x8'x12' MOJAVE / MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE. KLA -ALL BRICK WALL 68'x12' MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE. KLA -ALL BRICK FACE 4'x4'x12' MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE. KLA -ALL BRICK FACE 4'x412' MOJAVE / MAUNA LOA MISSION TEXTURE. PRE - ENGINEERED METAL STRUCTURE: PREF1NISHED METAL ROOF, PAINTED METAL FLASHING, PRE - ENGINEERED METAL STRUCTURE: PTD STEEL COLUMNS PTD STEEL CANOPY W/ PTD METAL DECK I/2' DEEP REVEAL, TYP SCUPPER & DOWNSPOUT, TIGHTUNE PER CML MECHANICAL SCREEN ON ROOF BEYOND CONT. GUTTER WI DS., TIGHT1JNE PER CML ROOF LINE BEYOND CONTROL JOINT SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, TV'. DECORATIVE METAL PANEL PAINTED DARK BRONZE NEW 10' HIGH ELECT. ROWING GATE WITH INTERWOVEN SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, REMOTE OPERATION ® NEW 10' -0' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE BLACK VNYL COLOR WITH PRIVACY SLATS AND OUTWARD SLANTED OUTRIGGER, ANCHORED AT BASE. GENERAL NOTES 1 GLAZING TYPE IG TYP., U.O.N. 2. t INDICATES TIG TEMPERED INSULATED GLAZING IYP. 3. ALL GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED W /TTS MAX U- FACTOR OF 0.90 & SOLAR HEAT GAIN CO- EFFICIENT OF 1.0 BY AN INDEPENDANT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC. 4. PROPOSED BUILDING WILL NOT HAVE ANY NEW SIGNAGE PAINT / MATERIAL LEGEND PNT - 1: RESTRAINED GOLD (SW6129, FN130) PINT - 2: NETSUKE (SW6134, FN135) PNT - 3: CAFE OLE (BM 2098 -40) KLA -ALL BRICK MOJAVE MISSION TEXTURE (MUTUAL MATERIALS) KLA-ALL BRICK MAUNA LOE MISSION TEXTURE (MUTUAL MATERIALS) METAL COLOR -1 DARK BRONZE METAL COLOR - 2 COLONIAL RED °WEST ELEVATION 0 15' -0' i 0 12 -7' i 0 21' -10' O EAST ELEVATION ENNERIMMEMENWI ��IiGfi�I ®F' EPETA UL �� 1fkp °SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16'. l' -O O WEST ELEVATION 0 T.O. PANEL +10' -0' T.O. WALL I —I FN. FLOOR r iie +4' -0' T.O. BRICK ® .I' —I' r: . a r c h i t e c t s CPArr Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue Suite 406 Seattle, WA 96101 206.120.7001 phone 206.720.2949 Gas www.crattarchltects.com CONSULTANT CQCbPYRc r CRAFT ARCHTECTS 2007. THESE DOCLATENTS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITH OUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION BY CRAFT ARCHTECTS OR WELLS FAROO. ISSUE 1L09.07 SITE RESUBMITTAL Revisions: Sheet Title rrrere�.e z m o cc g Q W c u_ ow J 0 LLI EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Dote: 11/09/07 Design: JAKB Drown: MLR,SN Project No: 745.00 Approved: KC Original dnMtg • 24' a 3E. Scale main acxadhtaN H reduced Sheet No: COPYRIGHT CRArl 6RCN1EC15 2007 A4.1 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE IOC Am= LAME: TAG SIZE/ DESCRIPTION LAMP INFORMATION BALLAST DESCRIPTION TOTAL VA MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER VOLT MOUNTING REMARKS TYPE QTY DESCRIPTION DA RECESSED, OPEN REETECIOR DOWNUGHT NTH "e' APERATURE FWO 1 26W DR 3500K. 80 + CRT (1) 1—LALP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 26 00111AM PORTFLLD AF 1/26 DR BAR 120 CEH 10 08126 E. 6251 U 120 REED GEEING GA FWO 2 F032 78 3500K. 80 + CRI (1) 2—LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 82 UONONOA METALUX 2AV 0 232 MDR 120 CFB106 2 RDI 232 RP 120V 5381 120 RECESSED CEILING RECESSED DIRECT ImUBiE NA KA SURFACE MOUNTED, SE STRIP LUMINAIRE CEILING INKED, GARAGE FORME WITH SILICONE 0ASKETTDOA. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM ICUSING L CLASS I MMODEM $ 2 1 2 5E $ 8 i 10 (1) 2— AMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST �� v UTHONIA METAUSX C 232 120 CM706 SS 232 120V EB61 120 SURFACE CEILING (1) 1 —LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST GARDCO SCBEHI9 0 400PSWI 208 B1A 208 SURFACE CEIU G LA1 SUSPENDED. 10o:AR SEMI—OORECT 4' WIDIARTE (1) 2—LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST PEERLESS COR .TIE 10 082 7232 MR 120 CE810 DCT LP835 F1/24• SCEP AZ WP2I82C120 AC 24' T1 MET 120 SUSPENDED 09.0(0 LA2 SUSPENDED, LINEAR SEMI—INDIRECT B' LUMINAIRE FUJO 4 F032 18 3500K. 80 + CRT (1) 2—LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 124 PEERLESS CIREIIIE 10 ON 7232 WHR 120 OEB10 OCT LP835 F1/24' SCEP AZ WP2182C120 AC 24' T1 CMET 120 SUSPENDED CELWG MA1 WALL MOUNTED. 4' VANITY UMNNRE FWO 1 F032 I8 3500K. 80 + CRT (1) I—LAIP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 32 UIHON IA METMUX WC 1 32 120 0EB106 BC 132 120V EBB1 120 SURFACE WALL MA2 WALL MOUNTED. 2' VANITY UMOTAIRE FWO 1 F017 18 35001X. BO + CRI (1) 1—LAMP ELECTRONIC BALLAST 22 mow METALUX WC 1 17 120 0E13106 BC 117 120V EB81 120 SURFACE WALL SA SINGLE HEAD, CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE. DIE CAST AUNINUM HOUSING, ANODIZED AUNINUM REFLECTOR AND TEMPERED GLASS LENS. PON 1 400W PULSE START METAL HALIDE 40000 75+ CRX (1) I —LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 410 GARDCO D119— I- 4X- 400PSM01 208 POLE AT 25' 12) SB1 DOUBLE HEAD, CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE. DIE CAST AWMWUM HOUSING. ANODIZED ALIMNUM REFLECTOR AND TEMPERED GLASS LENS. PAM 2 400W PULSE START METAL HALIDE 40001 75+ CRT (2) 1 —LAPP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 820 ITARDCO 0419- 2- 4X- 400PSLM 208 POLE AT 25' 1 SB2 DOUBLE HEAD, CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED WYWAJE WITH ROTATED OPTICS. PSMH 2 40068 PULSE START METAL HALIDE 4000K. 75+ CRI (2) 1—LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 820 GAROCO EHI9 -2-4 X— :00PSMH 208 POLE AT 25' 1 SC TRIPLE HEAD. CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE WITH HEADS SEPARATED BY 90 DEGREES. MN 3 400W PULSE START METAL HALIDE 40001 75+ CRT (3) 1 —LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 1230 GARDCO EH19- 3/90- 4X- 400P5101 208 POLE AT 25' 12) SD1 WALL MOUNTED. WIDE THROW AREA UNINAIRE, DIE CAST ALUMINUM HOUSWC. COMPLETELY SEALED AND CIA90ZTED. MH 1 176M METAL HALIDE 40001 75+ CRT (1) I— AMP HAM POWER FACTOR BALLAST 205 GARDCO 101 WT 175107 208 SURFACE WALL 1 SD2 WALL MOUNTED. FORWARD THROW AREA WMINAIRE DIE CAST AWMINUM HOUSING. COMPLETELY SEALED AND CASKETED. MH 1 175W METAL HALJDE 40001. 75+ CRI (1) 1—LAMP HIGH POWER FACTOR BALLAST 206 GARDCO 101 FT 175681 208 SURFACE WALL. 1 SD3 CUTOFF MI I—WAUPACXL UL USED FOR WET LOCATIONS. FUJO 1 26W MT ELECTRONIC HIGH POWER FACTOR 28 UIHONIA TWAC -26DTT -120 120 WALL 1 X UNIVERSAL MOUNTED LED EXIT SIGN WITH 0REEI LETTERS LED 1 GREEN LED 120 V POWER SUPPLY 3 UTHONIA LE SERIES 120 VARIES GENERAL N07ES: LUMINAIRE REMARKS: A. PRODUCT NUMBERS SHOWN ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIST MANUFACTURER LISTED ON THE LANAI E MEDIAE FOR EACH UMNAWE TYPE. ALL OTHER 111 RIMER TO ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS TO CONFIRM MOUNTING HEIGHTS. INFORM ENGINDS2 OF LISTED MANUFACTURERS ARE APPROVED BUT MUST MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFIED DEL CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT CUTIDI EIE 7S GF ALTERNATE AND CONFLICTS. APPROVED MANUFACTURERS PRODUCT ALONG WITH CIUSHEETS OF SPECIFIED FIXTURE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 0(001 ER. 1 SEE POLE DETAIL 2/EB.1. C. CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY CEILING TYPE AND THICKNESS AND PROVIDE REQUIRED LUMINAIRE MOUNTING TRIMS A BRACKETS FOR ALL FIXTURE TYPES. D. CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONSIBLE 10 VERIFY SINGLE OR DOUBLE FACE AND MOUNTING OF DM SCANS WITH LIMING PLANS AND AR ITIECTURAI CEILING PLANS AND PROVIDE WALL MOUNTING BRACKETS, CEILING MOUNTING BRACKETS AND/OR PENDANTS AS REQUIRED E IN LOCATIONS WHERE DUCT WORK RUNS OVER THE TOP OF RILED LUMINAIRES, THE LUMINARIES AT THESE LOCATIONS WILL BE HORIZONTALLY SUPPORTED TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUCT MORMONS. WYOLNRES ARE 70 BE SUPPORTED BY THE CEOND SYSTEI OR BUILDING STRUCTURE ONLY. F. ALL SUSPENDED LINEAR LUMINA TO BE EQUIPPED WITH WHITE POWER CHORD PROJECT: TIM ANNEX LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL SCHEDULE LOCATION MAN ELECTRICAL ROOM LCP -A 11V0/07 1U0 Pit RELAY PANEL LOAD DESCRIPTION ON /OFF CONTROL PROGRAMM NG REMARKS TAG NO. NAME CKT. SWEEP LS PC—ON PC —OFF TC —ON TC —OFF OS 1 SLIA 38 CORRIDOR UIITNG 1211OAM X X - 2 SLIA 39 OPEN OFFICE 12:01M X X 3 SHWA 41 OPEN OFFICE 1200AM X X 4 SL1A 37 OPEN OFFICE 1200AM X X 5 SLTA 35 OPEN OFFICE 1290AM X X 6 SLIA 2 EXTERIOR LIGHTING X X 7 4 B SL1A 6 EXTERIOR UGHTI G X X 9 B . 10 SL1A 7 EXTERIOR ICI. ROTC X X 11 9 . 12 SL1A 11 EXTERIOR LIGHTING X X 13 13 . 14 SLIA 15 EXTERIOR U CHTTNG X X 15 17 18 SLAB 57 EXMOOR LXIRNG X X 17 69 18 SPARE 19 SPARE 20 SPARE 21 SPACE 22 SPACE 23 SPACE 24 SPACE 25 SPACE 28 SPACE 27 SPACE 26 SPACE 29 SPACE 30 SPACE 31 SPACE 32 SPACE LEGEND: 10- THE CLOCK PC- PHOTOCELL OS— OCCUPANCY SENSOR AWL CONTACT, LS— LOCAL SWITCH GENERAL NOTES: REMARKS: A. SYSTEM 6 DESIGNED AROUND PO UIECEPER 32. 1 B. SWEEP OFF ME NOTED IS THE TINE TO STAR THE SWEEP. IT SHALL REOCCUR EVERY TWO HOURS UNTIL 4000.M 121 C. PROVIDE 32 RELAY DICI.OSLRE SIZE WITH 20 RELAYS INITIALLY 131 l:-mina! Salr' VW Ming 1932 FIrc1 Avenue Si. 'IE. 408 %.n-1 7, WA 9111(11 'll h.fJn J11111 irs 206.720.29'9 hnnf` w ww. c ra 1ta rt hit ec is .co m Date: Design: Drawn: CONSULTANT z 0 o 3 I GfLUN1.AC m.wvnl LSiPS Parnell, OR ,7364 T fCPaPt.— 2,213172.1676 mwe: 207W20018 C J. FERGUSON .6242••1 -2 4Wa1:121 rtar 11.09.07 STE R SUBMITTAL Sheet Title: B4LIRIGAL ILq/01 J0= Project No: 20V MM Approved: IJCin�E �i iii Sheet No: E0.1 C0PY1IGHT 112007 668680 ELECTRICAL SERVICE " \ RESPONSIBILITY \ UTILITY CONTRACTOR \ CO. PROVIDES TRENCHING & BACKFILL x PRIMARY CONDUITS X SECONDARY CONDUIT x PRIMARY CONDUCTORS X SWB UNE SIDE SECONDARY CONDUCTORS X TRANSFORMER (UTX) X UTX PAD/ VAULT x UTX CONNECTIONS X PRIMARY GROUNDING x CT ENCLOSURE x CH's x METER BASE x METER x METER GROUNDING X SECONDARY CONDUCTORS x \ UTILITY CONTACTS 1 NOTES; . 1. CONTACT AND COORDINATE ALL. REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH SERVING UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BIDS 2. ALL SERVICE INSTALLATION WORK SHALL BE IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SERVING UTILITY. 3. GWIAAC HAS CONTACTED THE UTILITIES BUT HAS NOT RECEIVED IN WRITING THE FINAL REQUIREMENTS FROM THE POWER UTILITY, TELEPHONE UTILITY OR THE CAW UTILITY. THESE DRAWINGS INDICATE OUR BEST ESTIMATION OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTACT THE UTILITIES AND OBTAIN IN WRITING THEIR REQUIREMENTS TELEPHONE UTILITY CONTACT; . . . QWEST PHONE: (206) 224 -1146 POWER UTILITY CONTACT; PUGET SOUND ENERGY 3130 S. 38TH STREET TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98409 PHONE: (425) 452 -1234 FAX: (253) 476 -6007 CABLE T.V. UTILITY (CAN) CONTACT' COMCAST PHONE: (800) 266 -2278 \ V i IIMIIIIMMENaIIIESTs ��� i ©. mi •Ii _ LCP —A -6,7 EXISTING BUILDING ( IOC) ■ \ \ \ \ SOT 5D1 O ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SCALE 1 - _20' 0 , 20' 40' \ \ \ PROJECT \ \ (I) 2'C. (1) 41. DI 4 SDI 501 \ SDI 582 A. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALL DETAILS APPLY SD1 FOR APPLICABLE SITUATIONS WHETHER REFERENCED ON THE PLAN OR NOT. 501 501 SD1 SD1 SDI SDI 5D1 SDI SDI GENERAL NOTES B. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR SITE LUMMAI2ES C. ALL SITE POWER SHALL BE MINIMUM /10 WIRE IN 3/4'C. SHEET NOTES m 1. SEE 1/56.0 FOR ATS FEEDER SIZES. SEE 1/58.0 FOR ACCESSORY CIRCUITS AND CONTROLS. 2. SEE 1/E6.0 FOR SECONDARY FEEDER SIZE 3. PROVIDE FIXTURE WITH BODINE ARCKEEPER AK175PRB REMOTE BALLAST. MOUNT BALLAST WITHIN 25' OF FIXTURE 4. REFER TO 1/58.0 AND 2/58.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFURIATION ON GENERATOR SYSTEM. 5. CONNECT TO NEW 2OAMP, 2 POLE BREAKER IN EXISTING 120 /208V POWER PANEL VIA 20AMP, 2 POLE RELAY. CONTROL RELAY FROM LCP —A. 6. CONNECT TO SERVING UTILITY. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. C Re a r c h ' t e c t s 1 "m1nTI ,R1rl Hu. (ling 1932 Fitt) Avenue SL to 408 Soptt e WA 98191 4,9. / /11 . /11)1 1 fI�� n nr 2 06.7 20 .29'9 frs n www.c rafta rchitects.com z m 0 IZ cn J J W CONSULTANT W co Z2 0 N >- < cc CC cc W • W U X X GLUMAC lystiod. e n ...c us.>na i loer att tnx I fMlriN s 303 370674 sari.: 207W2001A J. FERGUSON Enke. le. suts1104.11asnr 11.09.07 SITE RESUBMITTAL Sheet Title: ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN Date: IIN/01 Design: ,.KF Drown: ,/7 Project No: 20D12001A Approved: "EI;GICC.31 :.2 iii Sheet Na: El 0 COPYRROR82007 GLUMAC L_. EXISTING LUMINAIRE AP PROXIMATE LOCATION. FOR EXACT LOCATION. wu IING'LUM HIRE APPROXIMATE LOCATION. REFER TO CML PLAN R— FOR EXACT LOCATION. IT LCP—A = 16.17 L_�� 1 J O ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN- PARCEL 'B' 1%.20' SCALE 0 •- 10' 1 1 20' • i PROJECT NORTH 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 GENERAL NOTES A. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALL DETAILS APPLY FOR APPLICABLE STRIATIONS WHETHER REFERENCED ON THE PLAN OR NOT. B. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR SITE LUMINNRES• C. ALL SITE POWER SHALL BE MINIMUM #10 WIRE IN 3 /4'C. ' i',ELV: - �:- 0.0ALIT1' _ z:;r a r c h i t e c t s C PArr 1^•minal Sall, Hill Cling 1932 Firer Avenue SI.'Cc 908 Saa l' P , WA S•H101 iUh.''II /nnl ppnnnn Z06 720.29 =9 Fzc www. c ra Eta rchl tests .co in Z Q w m co > _c OOo (.! N- > Q WW wo J V X 2 w CONSULTANT GLUMAC I>a8V W ew5L9YbA P C- aa1sA 00. VIM [30191fSOS F. 363JiapDa 207W2001A tea. J. FERGUSON Y.'awalai •ast••sN•Iiase 11.09.07 SITE RESUBMITTAL Sheet Title: ELEORILAL SITE PLAN - PARCEL S' Date: 11/1/07 Design: JCP Drown: JKP Project No: 2070200IA Approved: iii Sheet No: E1.1 COPY#IGHT02007 GLUMAC