The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L07-052 - OPEN FRAME LLC - SPECIAL PERMISSION SIGNACME BOWL Park West Plaza. 100 ANDOVER PK W L07-032 Le s david kehle David Kehle Phone (206) 433 -8997 FAX (206) 246 -8369 E -MAIL: dkehle@dkehlearch.com TO: Dave Kehle 1916 Bonair Drive SW Seattle, WA 98116 Associated File Numbers: S05 -068 L05 -063 Applicant: Dave Kehle Location: 100 Andover Park West • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L07 -052 Type of Permit Applied for: Permanent Sign Permit — Special Permission Sign Project Description: Request for a Special Permission Sign to increase the allowable sign area for one wall sign for a restaurant within Acme Bowl. This approval is based on a proposed sign of 40 SF. The actual sign elevations have not been submitted nor have the actual dimensions been calculated. This approval is to allow an increase in sign area not an approval of a sign application. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: TUC Vicinity/Site Information NOTICE OF DECISION • August 29, 2007 Stacy MacGregor Page 1 08/29/2007 C:\Documents and Settings \DCD- Intern\My Documents \signs \Sign -- Notice of Decision acme.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor The proposed sign will be located on the northern face of the wall of the building located at 100 Andover Park West. The area of the exposed building face (EBF) is 672 square feet. The proposed sign is 40 SF. The setback of the building from the street is 150 feet. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 The existing wall sign for "Acme Bowl" is 157.13 SF. The area of the EBF where this sign is located is 2747 SF. Decisional Criteria The required front setback in the TUC is 15 feet. Upon approval as a Type 2 decision, according to TMC 19.32.140 (B), sign area may be increased 50% for each doubling of the required minimum setback up to a maximum of 500 SF or 6% of the total EBF, whichever is less (TMC 19.32.150) Per table 1 of TMC 19.32.140, the standard allowed sign area would normally be 31.88 SF for an EBF of 672 SF. Since the building setback is 150 feet (10 times the minimum setback required within the TUC zone), this application qualifies for review as a Type 2 decision. Six percent of the EBF for this building is 40.32 SF. The proposed sign area is 40 SF. The existing "Acme Bowl" sign was previously approved for an increase in size per application L05 -063. Six percent of the EBF where this sign is located is 164.8 SF while the sign is 157.13 SF. This sign meets TMC 19.32.140 (B) and is under the allowed 6% EBF sign size threshold. Conclusions III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS • 1. The building setback is a sufficient distance to allow an increase in the area of the wall sign. 2. The proposed sign area of 40 SF takes up 6% of the total area of the EBF, which is within the maximum threshold of wall sign area to EBF area as required by TMC 19.32.150. 3. The existing "Acme Bowl" sign takes up 5.7% of the total area of its associated EBF which is within the 6% maximum threshold of wall sign area to EBF area as required by TMC 19.32.150. II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a permanent sign permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, which is by September 12, 2007. Stacy MacGregor Page 2 08/30/2007 C:\Documents and Settings\DCD- Intern\My Documents\signs \Sign -- Notice of Decision acme.doc The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS • • Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Planning Commission decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Stacy MacGregor, who may be contacted at 206 -433 -7166, for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Deve pment City of Tukwila Stacy MacGregor Page 3 08/29/2007 C:\Documents and Settings\DCD- Intern\My Documents \signs \Sign -- Notice of Decision acme.doc Date: bt 2t� I* • \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal Created: 8-13-2004 Revised: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: //www.ci.tukwila.wa.us REVISION SUBMITTAL Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Plan Check/Permit Number: 1-01 0 52- ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued 34 Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: 2121C. Project Address: tl,e7 V pL / W4UEV. Wet t' Contact Person: 6 2 r? 1't3 • RECEIVED AUG 2 8 2007 Steven M. MuIOMVAINrTy DEVELOPMFNT Steve Lancaster, Director Phone Number: 100435- aqa - Summary of Revision: VaA5C hze 14CUIVira.19 ¢ 011. kt Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on david Ice c �,r August 28, 2007 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Stacey Re: ACME Restaurant Signage L07 -052 Dear Stacey, Thank you for the meeting yesterday, along with Nora, in going over the signage criteria and signage areas. I have revised the drawing to reflect the areas involved, and signage involved, which allows us a 40 SF sign for the restaurant. If you have any questions, please call. David Kehle DK/mt Cc: Mr. John Hunt w/1 set 0631 /citylet8 -27 -07 1916 Bonair Drive S.W. Seattle, WA 98116 RECEIVED AUG 2 8 2001 CO M UN: y UEVELOPIVENT (206) 433 -8997 fax (206) 246 -8369 email: dkehle @dkehlearch.com P david kehie August 10, 2007 Special Permission Director For: Park West Plaza/ACME Bowl Restaurant Signage • • AUG 0 1 ?00, eLQp . Within the ACME Bowl building is a restaurant serving lunch and dinner. It is an independent business, managed by a group not affiliated with the Acme Bowl business. It is imperative that the restaurant have a separate identity from the ACME Bowl and have a presence with signage as the other separate retail businesses have. We are seeking a sign code deviation for a 50% increase in wall sign area for each doubling of the zoning code maximum setback up to 6% of the wall area upon which the sign will be mounted up to a maximum of 500 SF. The retail and ACME Bowl structure is 150' -5" from the property line to building face. Zoning of the site is TUK (Tukwila Urban Center) which has a front yard setback of 15'. Since the setback is 10 times the required setback, the 6% or maximum 500 SF would apply. The new restaurant sign would be on the west elevation south of the main building entrance. The existing west wall total square footage is 5,700 SF but signage total is limited to 347 SF (6% max.). The wall area of the proposed sign is 672 SF which would allow a 40 SF sign area (2' x 20'). Please review and approve this special permission request. 1916 Bonair Drive S.W. Seattle, WA 98116 (206) 433 -8997 fax (206) 246 -8369 email: dkehle @dkehlearch.com Nora, Project File Number: L07 -052, Restaurant at Acme Bowl Project Description: Request for a Special Permission sign over the internal restaurant tenant space at Acme Bowl. Requires reducing the EBF for the existing "Acme Bowl" sign and determination if that existing sign will still meet allowed size according to the code. Associated Files: L05 -063 S05 -068 Information: The existing "Acme Bowl" sign is 157.13 sf. The proposed sign is 40 sf. • • There is a discrepancy between the area of EBF in the 2005 application versus the area of EBF in the present application and depending upon the year used, the results change. ( " -EBF ling Portion EBF Restaurant Portion S05 -068 2730 EBF 630 EBF 6% \ 163.8 sf 37.8 sf sign size �57.13.sf \ 40 sf L07 -052 236 - DO 670 EBF 6% 141.6 sf 40.2 sf sign size 157.13 sf 40 sf • Thanks, Stacy If the EBF area in 2005 is used, the Acme Bowl sign meets code but the new restaurant sign is too big. If the EBF area in 2007 is used, the new restaurant sign meets code but the Acme Bowling sign is too big. I ran this by Brandon and Jaimie and they both suggested asking you to determine what set of EBF numbers to use. I didn't get the file until Wednesday afternoon and played phone tag with Dave Kiele, the contact person for the project. From his phone messages, he shared that he has the 2005 application with penciled -in EBF square footage. He did not ever explain how he generated the differing EBF square footage on the 2007 plans submitted with his application. I used a scale to determine the square footage of the restaurant portion for the 2007 version of the above table. All of the three associated files are on my desk. I don't know if you want this application to stay pending for another week but I will gladly write it up when I get back. C:\Documents and Settings \DCD - Intern\Local Settings \Temp\XPGrpWise \acme memo.doc STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives he right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at too ( for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at l sk- •-w" a (city), W A (state), on J "w � 6 On this day personally appeared before me J ,svi N...nr-PC a me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 2914 DAY OF PAPlanning Forms \Applications\SPDirector•6A6.doc • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY Print Name Address Phone Number Signature ( - - 3 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on Z.. 2 009 RECEIVED AUG 01 2001 D Zo O - 4 Sw') 10=1 7v-k- ' L, ✓4 t, 20 0 1 December 4, 2006 ort Check items submitted with application Information Required. AUt ® 1 1U�� CO M M M ay be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and opit UNir APPLICATION MATERIALS: V 1. Application Checklist one (1) copy, indicating items submitted with application. 2. Permit Fee (LDR = $230, Other zones = $350). 3. Written description of the project, the deviation being requested and response to the applicable decision criteria. ZONING CODE PARKING DEVIATION 4. A complete description of the proposed construction relative to parking areas, and all supporting agreements. 5. Dimensional site plan(s) to demonstrate parking area consistent with Zoning Code requirements. 6. Parking studies as needed to demonstrate adequate parking is provided. LANDSCAPE DEVIATION 7. Landscape plan — two (2) copies showing size and species of existing and proposed plant materials, required perimeter landscape types, parking areas, buildings, walkways, transit facilities, property lines, dimensions and area of planting beds and any calculations necessary to demonstrate compliance with review criteria. SENSITIVE AREA ORDINANCE DEVIATIONS 8. Site Plan — two (2) copies showing all buildings, parking areas, walkways, property lines, planting areas, sensitive areas, their buffers and setbacks. 9. Sensitive area studies and enhancement plans to justify a requested buffer or setback reduction and demonstrate that the reduction will not result in a direct or indirect short-term or long -term adverse impact to the sensitive area per TMC 18.45.090 D. SIGN CODE APPROVAL/DEVIATION 10. Complete "Permanent Sign Permit Application" with all supporting materials and fees ($115). 11. The following information should be given on the plans: North arrow, title, scale and date; • r -' COMPLE f E APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Depigment of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). FIECE/VED P:\Planning Forms Applications 'SPDirector- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 unecxatems subiiutted .with . application+ Information Required. Maybe waivedan•unusual cases, upon approval of both.Public orks and Planning Vicinity map showing location and names of adjacent roads; Property lines; Locations of all buildings on site; Dimensioned elevations of building drawn to scale (for wall signs); Elevations, dimensions and materials of proposed sign(s) including advertising copy; Color elevation of proposed sign. CARGO CONTAINER APPROVAL -, 12. Site plan showing the location of the container(s) in relationship to parking areas, property : -. lines, buildings, streets, trails, landscape areas and setbacks. 13. Description of the proposed screening. 14. Dimensions of proposed cargo container. SINGLE - FAMILY DESIGN STANDARD EXCEPTIONS 15. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. 16. The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow, proposed house footprint, any existing structures, lot lines, setbacks, adjacent streets, driveways, parking areas, any sensitive areas and any fences, rockeries or retaining walls. P:1Planning Forms \ Applications \SPDirector- 6- 06,doc December 4, 2006 • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -SP Planner: File Number: L. O 7 — (76 a Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: • • RECEIVED OF TUKWILA ED Department of Community Developmaa 0 1 200 SPECIAL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9818tommuNlN PERMISSION Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431- 3661$VELOp� E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us DIRECTOR APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: VIAc��"' Ftoik, /k145 etsyL LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1CC r,Aviz f a u 9r &aim incoiez tub LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). (322 - be,'Lo DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: a. CI Address: III tO VaN102- tAl. 9 Phone: 10' 03' t 4 1 6 1q . E -mail: hk e % /elk cr6 h. tom Signature: *Mt% M. 4I1t' FAX: D' 14(015%1 Date: ell P:\Planning Forms 1. Applications \SPDirector- 6.06.doc December 4, 2006 REVIEW CRITERIA Please consult the Zoning Code or Sign Code as to the appropriate criteria for your specific proposals. In addition all approvals must be consistent with the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (TMC 18.100.030). Planning Division staff are available to discuss the decision criteria you must respond to and necessary supporting materials. PARKING DEVIATION • • ❑ Covenant Parking: where required parking is provided off -site (TMC 18.56.070(B)); ❑ Complementary Parking: where up to 10% of a development's useable floor area is determined to be linked to remaining area, such that it need not provide the normally required parking (TMC 18.56.070(D)); ❑ Reduction of the minimum required parking of up to 10 %, through an administrative variance (TMC 18.56.140). RECr IvEb AU G 01' 1007 A parking reduction may be allowed after: a. All shared parking strategies are explored. b. On -site park and ride opportunities are fully explored. c. The site is in compliance with the City's commute trip reduction ordinance or, if not an affected employer as defined by the City's ordinance, agrees to become affected. d. The site is at least 300 feet away from a single - family residential zone. e. A report is submitted providing a basis for less parking and mitigation necessary to offset any negative effects. In addition to the above requirements, the Director may require specific measures not listed to ensure that all impacts with reduced parking are mitigated. Any spillover parking that cannot be mitigated to the satisfaction of the Director will serve as the basis for denial. LANDSCAPE DEVIATIONS ❑ The landscape perimeter may be averaged if the total required square footage is achieved, unless the landscaping requirement has been increased due to proximity to LDR, MDR or HDR. Landscape perimeter averaging may be allowed as a Type 2 special permission decision if all of the following criteria are met: 1. Plant material can be clustered to more effectively screen parking areas and blank building walls. 2. Perimeter averaging enables significant trees or existing built features to be retained. P:\Planning Forms Applications \SPDirector- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 • • 3. Perimeter averaging is used to reduce the number of driveways and curb cuts and allow joint use of parking facilities between neighboring businesses. 4. Width of the perimeter landscaping is not reduced to the point that activities on the site become a nuisance to neighbors. 5. Averaging does not diminish the quality of the site landscape as a whole. ❑ In the MDR and HDR zones up to 20% of the minimum required front yard landscaped area may be developed for pedestrian and transit facilities. ❑ In the RCC and TUC zones required landscaping may include a mix of plant materials, pedestrian amenities and features, outdoor cafe -type seating and similar features. Required plant materials will be reduced in proportion to the amount of perimeter area devoted to pedestrian oriented space. SENSITIVE AREA ORDINANCE DEVIATIONS ❑ Setbacks TMC 18.45.080 F. All commercial and industrial developments shall be set back 15 feet and all residential development shall be set back ten feet, measured from the foundation to the buffer's edge. The Director may waive setback requirements when a site plan demonstrates there will be no impacts to the buffer zone from construction or occasional maintenance activities. ❑ Buffers TMC 18.45.080 G The Director may reduce the standard wetland/watercourse buffers on a case -by -case basis, provided the buffer does not contain slopes 15% or greater. The approved buffer width shall not result in greater than a 50% reduction in width. Any buffer reduction proposal must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that it will not result in direct or indirect, short-term or long -term adverse impacts to wetlands or watercourses, and that: a. Additional protection to wetlands will be provided through the implementation of a buffer enhancement plan; b. The existing condition of the buffer is degraded; c. Buffer enhancement includes, but is not limited to the following: (1) Planting vegetation that would increase value for fish and wildlife habitat or improve water quality; (2) Enhancement of wildlife habitat by incorporating structures that are likely to be used by wildlife, including wood duck boxes, bat boxes, snags, root wads /stumps, birdhouses and heron nesting areas; or (3) Removing non - native plat species and noxious weeds from the buffer area and replanting the area subject to TMC 18.45.080G.2.c.(1) above. P:1Planning FormslApplications \SPDircctor- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 ti SIGN DEVIATIONS • • ❑ In the single family zone (LDR): signs for all conditional uses and public facilities (TMC 19.32.080); ❑ In multi - family zones where signs face multi - family, commercial and industrial zones: signs of conditionally permitted uses, all public facilities and freestanding signs (TMC 19.32.100). In Commercial and Industrial (TMC 19.32.170) Zones: ❑ Signs of conditionally permitted uses, all public facilities and all free - standing signs, that abut or face single family zones (TMC 19.32.120) and multi - family zones (TMC 19.32.130); ❑ Any multi -tenant office building sign which has over 50% of the total allowed wall sign area (TMC 19.32.140(B)(4)); A 50% increase in wall sign area for each doubling of the Zoning Code maximum building setback up to 6% of the wall area upon which the sign will be mounted up to a maximum of 500 sq. ft. (TMC 19.32.140(A)(2) and (C)). Shopping Mall business wall signs (TMC 19.32.150(A)): ❑ To allow one wall sign to have more than 50% of the business's total allowable sign area in one sign. ❑ To allow one freestanding sign to have more than 50% of the site's total allowable sign area in one sign. CARGO CONTAINERS Approval criteria for cargo containers to be installed in the LDR, MDR, and HDR zones for institutional uses and in the RC, RCM, TUC or C/LI zones for permitted or conditional uses: ❑ Only two cargo containers will be allowed per lot, maximum length 30 feet. ❑ The container is located to minimize the visual impact to adjacent properties, parks, trails and rights -of -way as determined by the Director. ❑ The cargo container is sufficiently screened from adjacent properties, parks, trails and rights - of -way, as determined by the Director. Screening may be a combination of solid fencing, landscaping, or the placement of the cargo containers behind, between or within buildings. ❑ If located adjacent to a building, the cargo container must be painted to match the building's color. ❑ Cargo containers may not occupy any required off - street parking spaces. ❑ Cargo containers shall meet all setback requirements for the zone. ❑ Outdoor cargo containers may not be refrigerated. ❑ Outdoor cargo containers may not be stacked. P:\Planning Forms Applications \SPDirector- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 SINGLE- FAMILY DESIGN STANDARD EXCEPTIONS The design standards required at 18.50.050 (5) and (6) may be modified by the DCD Director. 1. The criteria for approval of a roof pitch flatter than 5:12 are as follows: a. The proposed roof pitch is consistent with the style of the house (for example modern, southwestern); b. If a flat roof is proposed, the top of the parapet may not exceed 25 feet in height; c. If a sloped roof is proposed, it must have at least 24 -inch eaves; and d. The house exhibits a high degree of design quality, including a mix of exterior materials, detailing, articulation and modulation. 2. The criteria for approval of a house with a front door that faces the side or rear yard are as follows: a. The topography of the lot is such that pedestrian access is safer or more convenient from the side or rear yard; b. The house will be set back at least twice the minimum front yard setback; c. The entrance is oriented to take advantage of a site condition such as a significant view; or d. The entry feature is integral to a unique architectural design. P:\Planning Forms \Applications \SPDirector- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 STM D DATE D DESCRIPNON P PROJECT 0691 ov14/01 M MK FOR PEWIT . D DRAWN BY 6MNPNYA . . T DATE . CHECKED BY P. ICENLE A PROPOSED TENANT SIGNAGE FOR T\\\\\\\\." gg ACME BOWLING: RESTAURANT 100 ANDOVER PARK WEST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PHONE (206) 433 -8997 FAX (206) 246 -8369 1916 BONAIR DRIVE S.W architect � SEAT8 E. 1 WASHINGT 6 C ( I IOC matL seydgA WUF• r I WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32• • I' -0• MUM AEA ACE •81V. m'- 6OUT1-1 ELEVATION 5041• 3/32• • my. PLDTE: ND ONANGES tO PREVIOUSLY AFMOVED SIGNAGE A B ca--,T5 00T10 WALL i&Et• 3141 �. enrAr.4 AMA MAX • W461 CUMBITLY NO SIGNACsE IN TNIS AREA NOTE: DOUBLIIZ CP SETBACK WCREASES SIGNACIE BY DOUBLE IMAX b%) WAAGE AREA MAX eDeP • A ' c2-T-c) G G:1 Yr-9 ili 1 1 i E!51 U1&LLAREA• RECEIVED AUG 2 8 1001 IPARR WEST R.A7A�` & Wes 3eratlordas 8/28x00 0 CNI T -1 /1.4,1.1 Ary