Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L07-089 - DICKINSON SCOTT - SHORT PLAT
JONES SHORT PLAT 13039 - 56T" AVE S L07 -089 April 28, 2008 Scott Dickinson Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central, #104 Kent, WA 98031 1. Preliminary Approval • Ciz of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Subject: Jones Short Plat; L07 -089 LAND DIVISION LAND DEVELOPMENT Related Files: Shoreline Permit; L07 -090 Dear Mr. Dickinson: The Short Subdivision Committee has completed review of your short plat application (No. L07- 089, and determined that it complies with all applicable City code requirements. The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. This letter serves as the Notice of Decision per TMC 18.104.170. Based on the latest project submittal, preliminary approval is granted subject to the conditions stated below. There are three basic steps in the short plat approval process: This letter constitutes your preliminary approval. The application was reviewed by the Tukwila Short Subdivision Committee and approved with conditions. The conditions imposed are to ensure the short plat is consistent with the Criteria for Preliminary Approval listed at TMC 17.12.020 C in the Tukwila Subdivision Code. Conditions of Preliminary Approval SM Page 1 of 5 H:\L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\Jones NOD - Short Plat.doc NOTICE OF DECISION 1. The existing garage and concrete foundations identified on sheet 2 of 2 "Cramer Northest, Inc. dated 11 -27 -07 cannot remain on Lot B on its own because a garage and shed must be accessory to a house on the same lot. Pursuant to TMC 16.04.020, demolish the garage after obtaining a permit from the City and pursuant to TMC 16.04.100 remove all the rubble 04/28/2008 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 and loose miscellaneous material from the lot. Contact the Permit Center at 206 - 431 -3670 to obtain a demolition permit. 2. Revise the short plat survey map as follows and as noted on the attached set of red -lined plans: a. Include note on recorded short plat stating: "Trees to be preserved pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code." b. Don't show the garage and concrete to be removed. c. Include newly planted trees and all significant trees. d. Do not show tree "T8" which is to be removed. e. Show the parking area added for Lot 1. 3. Revise the landscape plan. a. This evergreen tree is not a cedar. Photo b. c. d. e. f. • Correctly identify tree T14: 14" Cedar. included. Three probably significant existing trees are located on the site but not shown on the plans. Add them to the plans. One is located at the top of the slope, midway along the property. The other two are on the north- easterly fence line. Photos included. The legend shows circled trees. While the circle is intended to illustrate the root protection zone, the label beside this graphic says "significant tree to remain." A comment was received asking which trees will remain. Please amend the graphic to eliminate the confusion. Do not remove tree T9. Revise plans to reflect that this tree will be preserved. Locate all replacement trees on the lot from which the existing tree was removed from. Amend Construction notes and tree staking detail to reflect red -lined comments. 4. Locate a fire hydrant 250' of the existing and proposed single family homes. Residential fire sprinklers may be installed in lieu of a fire hydrant. On recording documents, include the fire hydrant or a note regarding sprinklers to verify this item is addressed. 5. Provide the following easement documents: a. A draft copy of Private Ingress/Egress & Utility Easement and Maintenance Agreement. (1) Verify that legal owner(s) name(s). This document shall be recorded prior to recording of the Final Short Plat Map, and the recording number be shown on the short plat map. (2) The Private Ingress/Egress & Utility Easement should include language stating who will maintain the paved area and utilities, and by what portion. b. Owner shall sign with Notary, a Private Sanitary Sewer Easement Agreement (within the Western portion of proposed Lot 1, for the benefit of proposed Lot 2.) SM Page 2 03/24/2008 H:\Stacy's Current Planning\L.07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\Jones NOD - Short Plat.doc This document shall be recorded prior to recording of the Final Short Plat Map, and the recording number be shown on the short plat map. 7. Pursu t to the Tukwila "underground ordinance ", all utilities shall be placed underground. Show utility lines (water, sewer, power /telecom, storm) to the new property line and access road cross - section. Submit for a construction permit to include a cost estimate for of infrastructure improvements. 8. Submit a s. of recording documents in either legal or record of survey format that meet the Appeals King County ' ecorder's requirements and contain the following items: a. A survey map . described in the application checklist that is consistent with all of the conditions of ap oval and revised to reflect the red -lined site plans date:d-9113l.OZh4the Concept Grr lip e surveyor's original signature must be on the face of the plat. See attached. b. Existing and proposed ; :al descriptions for all lots. c. Separate easement doc . ent with legal descriptions for any common access /utility infrastructure. This short plat approval decision is appealab appeal of the decision on the short plat, exclu valid appeals are filed within the time, limit the decis 1. The name of the appealing party. SM Page 3 H:\,Stacy's Current Planning1L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\ones NOD - Short Plat.doc to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative g challenges to the DNS, is permitted. If no n of the Department will be final. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appe• must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance o the Notice of Decision (04/30/2008). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila icipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and i the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone n ber of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged erro including any specific challenge to an MDNS. in the decision, 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, 03/24/2008 • • This document shall be recorded prior to recording of the Final Short Plat Map, and the recording number be shown on the short plat map. 6. Show utility lines (water, sewer, power /telecom, storm) to the new property line and access road cross - section. Submit for a construction permit to include a cost estimate for plot infrastructure improvements. 7. Pursuant to the Tukwila "underground ordinance ", all utilities shall be placed underground. 8. Submit a set of recording documents in either legal or record of survey format that meet the King County Recorder's requirements and contain the following items: Appeals a. A survey map as described in the application checklist that is consistent with all of the conditions of approval and revised to reflect the red -lined site plans dated 11/27/07 by Cramer Northwest, Inc.. The surveyor's original signature must be on the face of the plat. See attached. b. Existing and proposed legal descriptions for all lots. c. Separate easement document with legal descriptions for any common access /utility infrastructure. This short plat approval decision is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative appeal of the decision on the short plat, excluding challenges to the DNS, is permitted. If no valid appeals are filed within the time, limit the decision of the Department will be final. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision (04/30/2008). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, SM Page 3 05/02/2008 H:U_07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\Jones NOD - Short Plat.doc • • and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee of $215 [$115 in LDR]. Any appeal shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. 2. Final Approval The next step is to install the required site improvements, comply with the conditions of approval and submit the necessary short plat documents (survey, legal descriptions, and other required paper work). All taxes and fees assessed against the property must be current prior to final approval. Please check with the King County Assessor's Office and the City of Tukwila Finance Department prior to submitting final documents. After the documents have been found to be in order, and the all of the requirements of the short plat have been met, the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee signs your short plat which constitutes a grant of final approval. Expiration The final approved short plat must be filed with the King County Department of Records by April 28, 2008, one year from the date of this preliminary approval or the application will expire. The City may grant a single one year extension if requested in writing prior to the expiration date. 3. Recording The signature of the Chairman of the Short Subdivision Committee certifies that your short plat application is ready for recording. It is your responsibility to record the City approved short plat documents with the King County Department of Records. You will need to pay the recording fees and submit your approved original short plat to King County. The short plat is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. After recording, the County returns the recorded original to the City of Tukwila within 4 -6 weeks, at which time your short plat is considered complete. You can shorten this processing time by hand - delivering a copy of the recorded short plat to the project planner. SM Page 4 04/28/2008 H:\L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\Jones NOD - Short Plat.doc In many circumstances, building permits on the short platted property may not be issued until a copy of the recorded short plat (or original) is returned to the Department of Community Development. If you have any questions about this matter please direct them to the project planner, Stacy MacGregor. Sincerely, 64. JUck Pace Chair, Short Subdivision Committee • • Enclosure: Site Plan, red -lined Landscape Plan, red -lined Drainage plans, red -lined A3 Public Works Pavement Mitigation and Traffic Impact Fees Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application A2 Public Works Type C Fee Estimate Worksheet Private Ingress/Egress and Utility Easement Agreement Sample Private Sanitary Sewer Easement Agreement Sample Resolution 1627 cc: Jim Morrow, Public orks Director (please initial your approval) Nick Olivas, Fire Chief e initial your approval) Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer Andy Jones, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Department of Ecology, SEPA Division Muckleshoot Tribe L07 -089 SM Page 5 03/24/2008 H:\Stacy's Current Planning\L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\ones NOD - Short Plat.doc s � ys City of Tukwila January 27, 2010 Scott Dickinson via Melody Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central, #104 Kent, WA 98031 RE: L07 -089 Dear Melody, I have looked over the draft final short plat plan set, dated 1/7/2010, that you dropped off on January 20, 2010. There are a number of changes that need to be made to obtain final approval. First, as a condition of final approval two outstanding permits need to be finalled: permits D09 -220 (demo) and PW09 -098 (paving and grading). Second, Mr. Jones spoke with me about relocating his parking area from the front yard to the rear yard and putting in an access easement for future use. The access easement is shown but the easement is only for the benefit of Lot 1 and therefore is not an easement on Lot 1 but only a future private drive; Lot 1's legal description will be "together with" the Lot 2 easement. The 28' wide easement needs to include utilities. I made some notes on the plan sheets and have included a copy of my email with Mr. Jones describing these requirements. Draft copies of all of the easement agreements are required. Mr. Jones spoke to me about paving only the first 20' of the driveway apron and either putting a note on the plans that the driveway will be paved when Lot 2 is developed or he needs to provide a bond for 150% of the value of the deferred driveway improvements. Areas not paved need to be graveled in 5/8" minus. The Public Works permit needs to be revised to reflect these changes also. I also made some notes on the plans you submitted. Let me know if you have further questions. Sincerely, ,1 a y act egor, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development cc: L07 -089 • Department of Community Development Jim Haggerion, Mayor Jack Pace, Director SM Page 1 of 1 01/27/2010 H: \Complete projects \L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat \20100727 letter.doc 6300 Sotrthc•enier Boulevard. Suitt #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone 206- 431 -3670 • Fix: 206 -431 -3665 Stacy MacGregor - Re: New Driveway plan From: Stacy MacGregor To: Andy Jones Date: 12/24/2009 10:51 AM Subject: Re: New Driveway plan Merry Christmas Andy! I spoke with Al Metzler in Fire. He is okay with the driveway easement to the future garage for Lot 1 at 15' or 20' width but needs the driveway to Lot 2 widened to 20'. Fire code requirements change after 150' length and the additional driveway length triggers this requirement. Joanna Spencer in Pubic Works is fine with a 15' or 20' driveway to the future garage on Lot l She thinks turning radii need to be added for your sake (so you don't clip the corners) but she is not requiring a certain radius. She wants the parking pad to line up with the future garage (look at setbacks - -10' rear and 5' sideyard, and 10' building separation between the garage and house); she is not requiring anything but wants you to be aware. Joanna is okay with paving the first 20' length of the driveway to Lot 2 so long as you either bond for future paving or put a note on the face of the plat that the driveway will be paved when Lot 2 is built (include who would be responsible - -owner of Lot 1 or owner of Lot 2 or both if you put a note on the plat). I (Planning) would prefer you to install and use the driveway to the future lot 1 garage by putting in gravel and showing the parking on the plan. If you aren't ready to do this for final recording, approval requires that you park on a "approved, uniform durable surface" (gravel or paving and not grass) and you can put in the parking area we discussed off the southwest corner of the house. Parking for Lot 1 needs to be shown on the plan. Enjoy your holidays! Stacy, • • Page 1 of 2 Have we heard yet about the acceptance of the easement between the two parcels to allow for a parking area on lot 1 on the opposite side of the house vrs the driveway? Thanks. Have a nice Holiday. Andy Jones 13039 56 Ave S Tukwila, WA 98178 files•//('•\ Tama \YPnrrtwica\dR22d 7(`nt„L_ma:lA2nn .. ,1 rvi 1 '7421/ 1 1 GKCK 1 \!'!\171 nnnn, a nl V1^7 /7nl n Stacy MacGregor - Re: 13039 56th Ave S From: Stacy MacGregor To: Andy Jones Date: 12/08/2009 2:23 PM Subject: Re: 13039 56th Ave S CC: Joanna Spencer Hi Andy, 5tac9 • Paving the first 20' is a public works standard; the intent is to keep gravel from migrating onto the public street. Public Works will allow pavers in that 20' area provided that the first few feet inside the property line is paved. From your site plan, it appears that your property starts 3 -4 feet inside the street edge. The 6' the City paved when they resurfaced the street may give you the needed amount of paving and you can transition from paving to pavers. The parking area for the landward lot needs to be either paved in concrete, asphalt, or compacted gravel (5/8 minus). Your favorite city planner (ha ha), Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday- Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail »> "Andy Jones" <Ajones @viox.com> 12/08/2009 11:25 AM »> Stacy, Your favorite Tukwila resident again with another question. Thanks for your help. Page 1 of 2 Yesterday when our inspector (Dave) was there inspecting the new underground utilities he commented on our driveway. Dave said there needed to be 20' feet of asphalt /concrete from the road to the house (just the first 20' feet). There is currently about 6' of asphalt that we did not tear up when the rest of the driveway was removed. This asphalt was placed there by the contractor the city used to replace the road. My question, do we need to have concrete /asphalt for the first 20' of the driveway from the road? If so, can we use pavers instead of concrete /asphalt? We are going to have a rock driveway initially. We don't want to asphalt/concrete the entire driveway because the new house construction would ruin anything we install. n., •• \m , <,,. • , •■ „-,., /, 1 •,/, AA 1l,l,1.9ll, , .1 1 l,"A/„ TT 1, Inn // nnt, 4 Andy Jones 13039 56 Ave S Tukwila, WA 206 - 251 -8416 PS: The old garage, old foundations and the driveway have been removed! Yes! f / /!1. \T_ • \ N TT _ _ . . _ ' - _ \ A T / T ! 1 / 1 _ _ 1 • Page 2 of 2 '1!'1 /l/l _ _ 1 A/11 , 70'1'1n 1 1 r'1Tr 11 lltt TA /l/\n/l1 TT 1 -1 //\(l /nn/l/1 November 18, 2009 Andy Jones 13039 56 Ave S Tukwila, WA 98178 RE: L07 -089, L07 -090 Extension Request Dear Mr. Jones: Sincerely, J k Pace, Director cc. File (L07 -089, L07 -090) • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 2 EXTENSION REQUEST If you have any questions, please contact Stacy MacGregor at (206) 433 -7166 or by email at smacgregor @ci.tukwila.wa.us. SM Page 1 of 1 H: \Complete projects \L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\L07 -089 extension letter2.doc Jim Haggerton, Mayor Jack Pace, Director The City has received your request for an extension of the above short plat application. Your shoreline permit was issued on February 22, 2008 and short plat decision issued on April 28, 2008. Your short plat is scheduled to expire on April 28, 2009 and your shoreline permit requires construction, use or activity to commence within two years of the date of your permit or by February 22, 2010. On January 15.2009 you were granted an extension until February 22, 2010 to correspond to the expiration of your shoreline permit. As of this date, you have applied for demolition and public works permits and held a pre - construction meeting towards completing your short plat. Therefore, this letter grants you an extension for the full two years allowed in Tukwila Municipal Code for a short plat decision. Your extension is granted and the preliminary approval will expire on April 28, 2010. Please note that the subdivision title only allows for one extension of not more than one year. 11/17/2009 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Stacy MacGregor - Re: Tree Plan From: Stacy MacGregor To: Andy Jones Date: 11/16/2009 4:01 PM Subject: Re: Tree Plan Hi Andy, Any (or all) of these 4 trees will be fine to replace the 12' pear that you are removing. I spoke with my supervisor regarding your request for an emergency exemption to extend the length of time needed to complete the requirements of your short plat. From our phone conversations and a review of the conditions of your short plat, it sounds like the two possible challenges will be to complete the old foundation removal and to plant the 4 replacement trees. It appears that the Public Works requirements and the garage demolition will occur landward of the proposed flood emergency wall and you will be able to complete them by February. Until the wall is actually installed, it sounds that it will be difficult to know if these items will be outstanding or not. Regarding the trees, if you are unable to plant them as intended, the City can condition either your short plat, your future building permit, and /or require a bond from you for the value of the trees and their installation. There are planting areas indicated on the plan that are landward of the wall that may be suitable or you can delay their planting as indicated above. Regarding removal of the old foundation, you have at least a few weeks before the wall will be installed and we hope you will be able to complete the demolition prior to that time. We may be able to either bond or take a cash assignment for the value of the foundation demolition and condition a future building permit but the City hopes the demo can be complete before the wall is installed. The garage demolition and Public Works permits will still need to be completed. When you know what can and cannot be completed because of the wall, we can talk about how to address any outstanding issues on the site survey and plan maps that you will submit for final approval. Call or email if you have any questions. Thanks, 5tac9 • • Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday- Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm L I'I,... . ,.,n,iJ. .ti, ,,,‘ i,•i.ni,„, h,I „ .•i 1., r ih , ,. »> "Andy Jones" <Ajones @viox.com> 11/16/2009 11:22 AM »> f11. /('' •VT.,,,,r, \YArrer.,,;oo\ ADA 1'7 71-111, ,,,.,:1421111 111111'14'2'2'21 1 c1 1111\!`_ \x /1 111111111 u Page 1 of 2 1 1 /1 P)nnn Stacey, To help with our request, here are the trees we are considering: Acer macrophyllum (Bigleaf Maple) Quercus garryana (oregon Oak) Alder Alnus rubra Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga) We are planning to choose 4 trees from the one above. Do they all have to meet the 2 1 /2 inch caliper test? Please let us know. Andy Jones 206 - 251 -8416 • • gl o. / /!`A ADfl 1'7'74'/+ „1, .......:1 (1 ...,.l nnl'702211 1 G1 1n1 \!nIll 111 - 1n111 u Page 2 of 2 11 /1 LV1rrr November 16, 2009 • • Stacey MacGregor Assistant Planner Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Extension for Jones Short Plat; L07 -089 Related Files: Shoreline Permit; L07 -090 Dear Stacey MacGregor: The City of Tukwila has issued a "State of Emergency" as a result of the compromised dam (Howard Hanson Dam). We learned at the community meeting for Foster Point area this past Friday night that we will most likely have surveyors working and have a 3 foot high wall constructed across our property during the next four to five weeks. Of course the work will be to protect property in the Foster Point area, including our home. The purpose of this letter is to ask for an "emergency" extension of six to twelve months in our Short Plat Process. Had this "State of Emergency" not existed we most certainly would have completed this work before our February 2010 expiration date. We have all the demo and utility permits but only require the work to be done. While we will proceed on our project with haste, there is a high probability that the emergency work by the city will interfere with our ability to meet the requirements of the Short Plat and Shoreline permit. Specifically, these are the items we might be unable to complete: 1. Demo of the garage and foundations on the property. 2. Planting of the native trees on the property. 3. Full installation of utilities to the potential building site of the new home. 4. Complete the survey map as required by the Notice of Decision. Given the "State of Emergency" in place, please grant us an extension of six to twelve months to meet the requirements of our Short Plat. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Thomas A. Jones 13039 56 Ave S Tukwila, WA 98178 206 -251 -8416 January 15, 2009 Scott Dickinson via Ale Kondelis Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central, #104 Kent, WA 98031 RE: L07 -089, L07 -090 Extension Request Dear Mr. Kondelis: Sincerel City of Tulcwi e, irector cc. File (L07 -089, L07 -090) • • Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director EXTENSION REQUEST The City has received your request for an extension of the above short plat application. Your shoreline permit was issued on February 22, 2008 and short plat permit issued on April 28, 2008. Your short plat is scheduled to expire on April 28, 2009 and your shoreline permit requires construction, use or activity to commence within two years of the date of your permit or by February 22, 2010. You have requested an extension of your short plat that will continue until February 22, 2010 which will correspond to the expiration of your shoreline permit. Your extension request is granted and the preliminary approval will expire on February 22, 2010. Please note that the subdivision title only allows for one extension of not more than one year. If you have any questions, please contact Stacy MacGregor at (206) 433 -7166 or by email at smacgregor @ci.tukwila.wa.us. SM Page 1 of 1 H: \Complete projects \L07 089 & 090 Jones Short Plat\L07 -089 extension letter.doc A ?/1 /1 11 Inn - T 17- -. -. -- • .. ...AS. .. Jim Haggerton, Mayor 01/14/2009 City of Tukwila Community Development Stacy MacGregor 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila WA 98188 RE: Jones Short Plat (L07 -089) Dear Ms. MacGregor, We are requesting an extension for the Jones Short Plat. We were granted approval with conditions on February 22, 2008and was given 1 year(s) to record. We have been working on the shoreline master development permit, civil construction and infrastructure design and are not going to be able to record in the time originally allotted. We are requesting a one year extension until February 22, 2010 to record. We appreciate your assistance with this project thus far. Please contact me with any further comments or questions. Sincerely, 2 Cramer Nort west, inc. Ili Surveyors .Planners °Engineers RECEIVED JAN 1 3 2009 DEVELO� Ale Kondelis Project Coordinator 945 N. Central. Suite #104 Kent WA 98032 (253) 852 -4880 Fax (253) 852 -4955 www.cramernw.com E -mail: cni@cramemw.com January 12 2009 Project: ttastc____a;=4,29, 111L s\\.3,4 Y,_,+ Address: V 3(611 .43 Date transmitted: \2- I 1 �`0�7 Response requested by: ( 21 2S. 1 Staff S--\0,c coordinator: LA '(N\C,c, 2 931 Date response received: TO: '' G 1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Building ! Planning Public Works �rz Plan check date: � z 7 7 • File Number L� �1 -o3 Lot -Dbo LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM al Fire Dept. '_!! Police Dept. Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and /or support materials as needed.) C 2NV1Y1O N O- F(1- P At A p1 oo4L SNovL D 11-1CLUDE DENtot/n/7N o CISrI tdc.( 6A-12A6 41117 (1 t-D CCd NG TOPH1 IDE1.1nFi En .) H FF.-j a r I N 1(e), Oil-, CZC 4 V 4C2./17ON l /T"td ta. E 7 E th fer4R t.tANy TU 47cN Zoo,L74-, /to 41L Dmol -/T/ON R/,/tEle ( /vc /E) kip thzS• M /.6GELL+4Ne. a _s ALS G ,8g :ENO I z 2 Comments prepared by: Update date: Project: . 1R.1 S\\;-( c,\1 Address: 1a03q Stn .43 e, Date transmitted: a 1 M`07 Response requested by: (2 f 2 S 1 Staff coordinator: 3\(),,C, LA MC C.. (-_ COC` Date response received: TO: Building DID f431ir City of 7 ukwila Department of Community Development TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM L Planning • 9-C Ge5 rgga lum A (9 Plan check date. RECE110 UtC 14 2007 Public Works Fire Dept. REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional commen, sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 0/1 t,1/l ✓it if , & I W 1M.9I ( vex r.' tail i (j t' (re—(. �G Qy{,Q� yw✓ i tit,e,th_ hi4fit, Fb I 1 Ft-t c i s o-ap f t b ,,,, 5 (moire,/ c--12,(-0-e-r { pow evii w i,,�e_, , D,cc ess vo-ad )(- s,ed-, o(.,�, ow 4 .ttc,La e ems; Commen ) T iz. c fr Update date: prepared by: O' J l'r-to 7 oio File Number LO Ton L61-0 90 = i Police Dept. !! Parks /Rec A /14A- awe, Project: ,-, ),:k- Address: \ 5CA 3 A . e Date transmitted: `2- I iv`O 7 Response requested by: ( 2 12 Z 107 Staff coordinator: i (� 't3,C LA ' (-N��C'�.0 -6l Le a;� Date response received: TO: ;=g Building Plan check da e: ft 1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM bib Planning Public Works Comments prepared by: � File Number LQ1-0)3 / L01-00 ire Dept. Police Dept. Parks /Rec REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 1J �'�E� , 0,11 b,R Z 50 rk .■s' .s I re i as -a Sv� �Cp„N:,uj � vv� S , c.∎ cc S v k u c vti s tAAI \-\,4 r4 o c. A on RC►cC�tv,r, flog.► s 3�ev, q0 �n,lLc C1 , Update date: December 17, 2007 Scott Dickinson Cramer Northwest, Inc. 945 N Central, #104 Kent, WA 98031 Subject: Jones Short Plat; L07 -089 Shoreline Permit; L07 -090 Dear Mr. Dickinson: The Department of Community Development received you applications for a two -lot short plat and a shoreline permit for the property located at 13039 56 Ave S. You applications are considered complete as of December 17, 2007 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. As the next step, the City will coordinate the required public notice for your project. The posting and notice of land use application will occur by January 1, 2008. At that point, the comment period will start. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at (206) 431 -7166. Sincerely, (1) Stacy egor Planning Intern City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Steven M Mullet, Mayor cc. L07 -089 & L07 -090 SM Page 1 12/14/2007 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Scale For all development except one single - family residence, 2 -9 lot short plats, four -plex or smaller multi- family residence, or non - residential development that is categorically exempt from SEPA. Submit a detailed project description including location, existing facilities, and proposed facilities. PROJECT ADDRESS: 002,9 , d qvZ 5. PARCEL #: 217 ) -(ryp Contact's Name: 5i 7 DI�JJ.t/ Off/ Contact Phone #: 62 53) 8.5„) 9880 Contact e-mail: SC J $) giva CO Contact Address: W5 N. 4'."4/7/-k SZCG . '/e2 J 1L/A 9,0,032. PASSED This test notice is valid for 90 -days from signature date. Capacity of the concurrency facilities combined with the addition of any detention (if required) for the proposed development is equal to or better than capacity required to maintain the established level of service standard. Compliance with the City's adopted Surface Water Manual ensures concurrency and any additional items noted below. Additional items: By: DOES NOT PASS Print Name: Rvan D. Larson Approved 01.20.2006 • nA N agav //410/7 Sr. Surface Water Engineer Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206.433.0179 CONCURRENCY TEST NOTICE SURFACE WATER Date EXECUTED at CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the Toss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. Print Name Address Phone Number Signature ss /an v f'i (city), WO (state), on de VI ni dir 1 , 20 OT On this day personally appeared before me Thti RS executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged tha( and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS ``�O� K 1 f /f - Jenes he signed the same as l aAnet NO LIC in and for tie .,t �� p ( Ally V y Q " .', 0 U 2 - • " residing at /L e 44 V #g= i � % Ge B �� c ,-,� / /'I1 7TF I OF W A �' � 111 11\ %%\‘‘‘ P:\Planning Forms 'Applications\ShonPlat- 6- 06.doc, 2006 T1LemAs 4 . N tics 13039-G - 4 7 g ,40E 5 t Y KwiL� 9)3 My Commission expires on DAY OF NJ V C m 12e4 , 20_4 to me known to be the individual who er voluntary act and deed for the uses f Washmgton0 yv�I- x '2 8 2001 dq '°," December 4, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY !!� Subdivision Guarantee I Guarantee No.: SG- 2631 -12202 I h � Effective Date: October 25, 2007 at 12:00 AM The County of KING and any City within which said subdivision is bcated in a sum not exceeding $1,000.00 �� That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary of said Subdivision Guarantee, theonly parties having any record title interest 1 in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting 1 I to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedication as shown in Subdivision Guarantee. 11 li I 1 Signed under seal for the Company, but this Guarantee is to be valid only when it bears an authorized countersignature. lj � I ii Countersigned by: PO •P___D Authorized Countersignature STEWART TITLE Company SEATAC, Washington 114 Fee: $300.00 Order Number: 207159895 F Fi F F F F F I F F F F F 0 I F j l `I F Fi fl F F F I � In writing this company please address it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252, and refer to E petpd� umber. Fi Da [[JJ City, State 4<._.41..1,1■■, AL- . w.:t. AL _--- .J__L._ L .L..�..J.__A...:� = Stewart title guaranty company 5)- Senior Chairman oft e Board Chairman of the Board President Guarantee Serial No. SG- 2631 -12202 ► TTTT T'rTTT'rTTTT'rTT TTTT ■• T� Guarantee No.: SG- 2631 -12202 Order Number: 207159895 Subdivision Guarantee: $300.00 Reference Number: JONES Sales Tax: $26.70 Effective Date: October 25, 2007 at Total: $ 326.70 OWNERS: THOMAS A. JONES, AS A SEPARATE ESTATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACTS 10 AND 11 OF SECOND ADDITION EAST RIVERTON GARDEN TRACTS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 79, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF AS ORIGINALLY PLATTED LYING BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER SUBJECT TO: 1. ANY QUESTION THAT MAY ARISE DUE TO THE SHIFTING AND /OR CHANGING IN THE COURSE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER. 2. RIGHT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER. 3. RIGHTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO THE UNRESTRICTED USE OF ALL THE WATERS OF A NAVIGABLE BODY OF WATER NOT ONLY FOR THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF NAVIGATION, BUT ALSO FOR COROLLARY PURPOSES; INCLUDING (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) FISHING, BOATING, BATHING, SWIMMING, WATER SKIING AND OTHER RELATED RECREATIONAL PURPOSES, AS THOSE WATERS MAY AFFECT THE TIDELANDS, SHORELANDS OR ADJOINING UPLANDS AND WHETHER THE LEVEL OF THE WATER HAS BEEN RAISED NATURALLY OR ARTIFICIALLY TO A MAINTAINED OR FLUCTUATING LEVEL, ALL AS FURTHER DEFINED BY THE DECISIONAL LAW OF THIS STATE. (AFFECTS ALL OF THE PREMISES SUBJECT TO SUCH SUBMERGENCE.) 4. RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, DEDICATIONS, NOTES, EASEMENTS AND PROVISIONS DELINEATED AND /OR DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 79 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Guarantee No: SG- 2631 -12202 • SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE • Stewart •title guaranty company 5. CONNECTION ABANDONMENT AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: KING COUNTY AND: MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE RECORDED: APRIL 28, 1981 RECORDING NUMBER: 8104280604 6. DEED OF TRUST AND GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: NOTE: GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2007 WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID. AMOUNT: $2,676.44 LEVY CODE: 2411 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 217200 - 0050 -07 ASSESSED VALUATION: LAND: $ 86,000.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $132,000.00 Guarantee No: SG- 2631 -12202 • SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 0 THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: THOMAS A. JONES, UNMARRIED CHICAGO TITLE CAHSE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION $116,230.00 MAY 6, 2003 MAY 14, 2003 20030514002917 - stewart -title guaranty company • • SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE The Company's liability for this report is limited to the compensation received. This report is based on the Company's property records, and no liability is assumed for items misindexed or not indexed in the public records, or for matters which would be disclosed by an inquiry of parties in possession or by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. This report and the legal description given herein are based upon information supplied by the applicant as to the location and identification of the premises in question, and no liability is assumed for any discrepancies resulting therefrom. This report does not represent either a commitment to insure title, an examination of or opinion as to the sufficiency or effect of the matters shown, or an opinion as to the marketability of title to the subject premises. I certify this is a true accurate reflection of those documents on file at the King County Court House, Seattle, Washington as of the date and time referenced above. Don Peters :dc Guarantee No: SG- 2631 -12202 1 stewart •title guaranty company * 4 0 4 7 r, * r9 0 V 1 .• 0 r stewart title This sketch is provided without charge for information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to area, dimensions, encroachments or locations of boundaries. It's not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. 10 7061 0030 1 41 ti� 7 114 5 Psi Q tio 6 17?001 0040 1 10501 0045 11 775011 0080 b3 16B7S, 0275 5615+ 1 562$1 on iy 1j 18 14 176001 lam; 0070 0075 ,74/ 57 8 %, ti> „10 010 0. 1 _A 4 .sZ 0 16 • • ORDER NO:. 207159895 1 H 4 0005 30 51 q A th ®nti c 105581 0025 55 1a :561 0020 58 t N !1} 11750{ 0281 ,YC • Stewart 0::1 title ORDER NUMBER: 207159895 18000 International Boulevard South, Suite 510 SeaTac, Washington 98188 206 -770 -8700 • 888 - 896 -1443 fax 206 - 770 -8703 • 253 - 882 -2033 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS: 13039 56TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA, WA 98178 Branch :STK,User :8763 9805141571 When Recorded Return To: THOMAS A. JONES 13039 56TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WA 98178 Reference Numbers of related documents: on page of document Grantor(s): RENSLER V. SNOW Additional Names on page of document Grantee(s): THOMAS A. JONES Additional Names on page of document Legal Description (abbreviated): Full legal on page of document Assessor's Propeny Tax Parcel Account Number(s): 2172000050-07 Z.300 / THE GRANT R RENSLER V. SNOW. A SINGLE PERSON for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid. conveys and warrants to THOMAS A. JONES, AN UNMARRIED INDIVIDUAL the following described real estate. situated in the County of Mug, State of Washington: TRACTS 10 AND 11 OF SECOND ADDITION EAST RIVERTON GARDEN TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS. PAGE 79. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY: EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF AS ORIGINALLY PLATTED LYING BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Account Number(s): 217200-0050.07 Subject to: EASEMENTS, COVENANTS. CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD Dated Sixth day of May, 1998 ER V. SNOW Ill State of Washington } �, 8 County of King } i certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that RENSLER V. SNOW is /are the person(s) who I appeared before me. and said person(a) acknowledged that _U. signed this ioutru t - t and acknowledged gi it to be _ free ags1-901Untagg act for the uses and purposes mcntioyed in this ins 0 0 pY DO w". i DATED: 4 1 4 , I 1 !1 lS V A ("t!!: y ,y to a n d tot th e of W y N�'. y , Pl�^..t]C D Or My ppoWateauupltrr. U 'I -I � - V KING, WA Document: DED WAR 1998.05141571 • Order: 207159895 Title Officer: 41 Coe .1t: Station Id :BXRE STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED EiSi1095 O5/14/9 TILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUFcT TfAN®NAIION TITLE INSURANCE 1973.70 1E9000.00 Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/30/2007 2:06:34 PM • PLAT Oi Secon"d:A/(- O?t1 E ist I t ll> C'l 'toI Z /905 DE,scvrra This Pb/ o/ /he SECOND ACD /T /GN of E�IJ r R / ✓EATo'v 6AROE/V TR�TJ embrocv all 9/ 1/K ..Souiti >vast Qua,/a.- 11/:e .5oz,N7co51 Qua , oral lot T>un •,n .,5ed an /i one s/x NNAl,r>�s/ Qu0,Xr, y/ the Nor/b0.0.0 Quor /er and Lois Two Thrcc and Six /;7...5C4750. . /4, all /• Twnshp 23 Nor/h, Rork. 4 Eau" ol, / W, M. me ,»o/ Pol•/ /a 1/ u/feos/ turner c✓ Bennet/ L. c%hne Avnbm Cloin7 which i5 e9a631e0/ N 197 22 -30 "114 of the ..5o,s4 4 Coinei 9 Sec1 ,on / ii..77 23 N,• R 4 Cast c the /4/M. • J i9 /) Lo/ Tract, S1rc�- A• cesuc. Rocd 0/X7 r/ /- 040y dv»cn - • • 5/OrJ.s' ore 0.7 ,?r.'wn 0r7 plot I/7 ' • 'Cornets morrrea /*L.' or, the ,a o/ oec Jet on //x J,GE /,ix 9/ the /rtxis - .-''ore ore In/ended .for Wilnea7 Corneru to //x /rue corner 2 be v/ob /.,sh n ' ed an /he Norbo/ Line D EDICAT ION 4A 'r A r(NOW ALL MEN BY 7 PRL:SGNTJ; Tr7p/ 1, W. R Pone./7, owner i 14 :in /G //1e abort d49Griliad line/ of /and embrxm' ,;7 sb, 0 A - . onncxed - �a/ O SECOND ,400, nory EA.3 ' /VG4 ran/ GARDEN T/Z9cr,S - Nn Ccu.' j {4f2th /nylan, 9' O!. ./x.rctxy marrc and o(cbrn ,void plot d cdxofe io r/x use a/ //r puH.G fo/rocr. as or/d f/,or hg.qhe 14 �� 7d r/9h / -�woys depb//ed •: T.1 se/ my bond 00a-50,0/ )974 /3*' 0i Owner as my Joie and sepsrok Geo E. M/rthU/ R ;' •= • 0. CI chwye.rns _ 1a cts -- � 70 M/NG COUNTY lNASH ZJF 79 Ij SULE /_•200 A.E. FIJLLfR Ur,L U6/NELR 'ry • M MESPENNL 157 SI t_. -1 Is . r 155 0 4 0 '0 • 4 NIENIMMI NEM p . ROAD � s le � A 107 � IP r 1115 o.r 0�. P,. _;. _r __' -- 179 1, .4..1 10? • 154 • ,. grope -434 • Approved /hl:, /4 cloy o /EEcensb v A.O. /905 A.L. /b/cn/rx Coun/yL3urvcyor. Exom,i,cci orb oppro d by sre 6card o /C,avnly C0mm,35,0ne.V /his /4d0., 9/ 1. Gtc. AQ /905, • r�cl Sm. %h N .367i28 ! wn m.a5,cnr/s "/ /ca 4,' rcccvd 0 rcq uc7/ o/ H. Ox. /4 / 0 SS m/n.Ghs/ C RA/ 0ro'rrco,z1o> /n XV.. /2 0 P,bds p09c 79. Reco,'d5 9/ /fii/9 COGAI./, /a6sh. i ✓. P�kjnex Coun/y Aud//or ACKNOWLEDGMENT' Sink 4Yot/ n f Co n4' q/1/o»9 s Thi., ,s to ccr iht7/ on /hie /31 doy, dd EocuntrJ /905. be/orc /?7C / undeY.fgrxd 0 No%ry PL/b /,c .n Ono' or fix S /o.E o/ 1ya h n9lon, duk/ C , v5 s ox0 bn• Jworn. ono //yy o'me / 0 P. fb//cn, prrJOnd //yy rrrrown to /ZC to be Me /rx/i�,du6/ who5c nan• ,s subjubcd'10 /, /o o, /Mot and deico /ion, and ocilnow /cr5m' fo nx /M/ ht J/ ore ..s akd the .some /rye e of his , ore talo io' oos' r u n /ary o / o s/x scs ore purpoee.5 f cuc mc nfroneo' 00,X., 05 his Jai orescpy ote prop ...:� ixss /774//70/76/ or,d c/,c/0/ sco/ // day, and.11r'a ,n this cer /fca /c firs/ otnrc rwr,//cn. D. Al To99oi/ No/o -q Pub /,c rn erno' fcr flat S/o/c 9/ ,067..5/7ir, to7, rrs.td/r9 • MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE KING COUNTY SEELYE CONNECTION ABANDONMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the j day of 4pv-; 1 1981, between King County, a legal subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "the County "), and the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a metropolitan municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "Metro "); W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the parties have heretofore entered into a long term agreement for sewage disposal dated July 17, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the "Basic Agreement "); and WHEREAS, said Basic Agreement superseded the Agreement for Sewage Disposal dated June 19, 1961 with Ring County Sewerage and Drainage District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Original Agreement "); and AREAS, pursuant to said Original Agreement, Metro constructed the Seelye Connection as an interim metropolitan facility to tempor- arily connect the local sewage facilities of Ring County Sewerage and Drainage District No. 4 to the metropolitan sewage system; and WHEREAS, construction of the Empire Way Interceptor in 1975 permanently connected most of the above described local sewage facilities to the metropolitan sewage system; and WHEREAS, in 1979, the County assumed the duty to maintain, operate, repair, relocate and replace the Seelye Connection, as identified on Exhibit A attached hereto; and KHEREAS, complete abandonment of the Seelye Connection in 1981 is now deemed to be in the best interest of King County and Metro: T t:Err,nE, in consideration of the mutual covenants :. -d h ;r•_ ..., it is h. 3grc :.. as fo11own: Section 1. Definitions. The defined terms used in this agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Basic Agree- ment, which is hereby incorporated by reference and made fully a part of this agreement. Section 2. Design and Construction of Certain Facilities. It shall be the sole responsibility of the County to disconnect all sewage facilities now tributary to the Seelye Connection and to connect said facilities to the Empire Way Interceptor. Engineer ing plans, specifications, and contract documents for the construc- tion of facilities necessary to accomplish said connection to the Empire Way Interceptor shall be submitted to Metro for review and written approval before advertisement for bids. It shall also be the responsibility of the County to cap or plug the upstream terminus of the Seelye Connection following the aforementioned disconnec- tion of tributary facilities. The County shall take any and all reasonable action necessary to complete the work described in this Section 2 during 1981. Section 3. Ownership, use, and Maintenance of New Facilities. The County shall own, operatr, and maintain all facilities con- structed under the terns of this agreement. Metro shall have no responsibility for operation and maintenance of these facilities. Section 4.. LiabilitY, The County shall indemnify and hold harm- less Metro from and against any and all claims, litigation, demands and suits for any personal injuries and property damage suffered or incurred by any person arising from the construction. operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of the facilities described in Section 2. Section 5. Reimbursement Acount. In consideration of the terns and conditions of this agreement, Metro agrees to pay the County an a ou.nt equal to 50% of the total construction cost of t om,. f L : _ :es c ons• r uctod ursuant to Section 2, said a-:ount not .o•nl construction cost shall mean cr,ntr.nct engin-vr.nq • 5;.;r 3n1 insr Ct ion cosy _ sales _r . _ i of . d: cm.: nL.-. Arld r ig!1L:. of ATTEST: way, legal costs, and property restoration costs. Payment of the reimbursement amount shall be made to the County following accept- ance of the above described work by the County and within 60 days of receipt of a properly documented invoice submitted to Metro. Section 6. Basic Agreement Unchanged. Except as provided in this agreement, all provisions of the Basic Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date and year first written above. ING COUNTY County Execu •ve MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE Executive Director 1, 1 LE - /n ' oo- • KING COUNTY SEWERAGE ¢ ORA /NAGE __D /STR /CT /4/9 4 EX /STING SERV /CEAREA (15 11M173 OP &MAR I in =Ma , . S /1ri wart .- -1M''rf .••• 1, \IN!lacIrr or % v 600* AWI • .5«1.r6 C'n *v • Cramer Northwest, Inc. • Surveyors •Planners •Engineers PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT OF ANDY JONES SHORT PLAT 13039 56T" AVE S TUKWILA, WA 98178 FOR ANDY JO 13039 56 AVE S TUKWILA, WA 98178 SEPTEMBER 21, 007 C.N.I. JOB NO. 2006-087 Prepared by Paul J Nitardy, P.E. 945 N. Central, Suite #104 Kent WA 98032 (253) 852 -4880 Fax (253) 852 -4955 www.cramemw.com E -mail: cni@cramernw.com EXPIRES 11/26/2007 RECEIVED NOV 2 R 2007 COMMUN1 DEVELOPMENT • TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW II. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY III. OFFSITE ANALYSIS IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES VII. OTHER PERMITS VIII. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN IX. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT X. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL APPENDIX A OFFSITE ANALYSIS REPORT APPENDIX B BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET I. PROJECT OVERVIEW • Existing Conditions: • • This project is located at 13039 56 AVE S in Tukwila WA. The property is approximately 0.62 acres. There is an existing house, garage, driveway and old concrete foundations. Most of the site is covered in grass, with a few trees and bushes scattered around the property. The runoff sheet flows off the property in two principal directions. The quarter of the property near the river sheet flows to the river. The rest of the site sheet flows to the southeast. No significant amounts of upstream flow enter the site. The level one drainage analysis can be found in Appendix A. Proposed Conditions: The property will be divided into two residential Tots. The existing house will remain, and a new house will be added closer to the river after all the previous improvements have been removed. Both lots will gain access from a new driveway to the southwest of the existing house. The new home will route roof runoff through downspout dispersion trenches, and the driveway will make use of sheet flow dispersion. II. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY This project qualifies for Small Project Drainage Review. The following requirements_of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) will be provided as follows: Core Requirement #1, Discharge at the Natural Location: The site's drainage pattern currently tends to sheet flow in two principal directions off the site. The quarter nearest the river sheet flows to the river. The rest of the site sheet flows from the northwest to the southeast and enters the drainage system in 56 AVE S. Runoff will continue to head in the two principal directions, with slightly more runoff heading directly to the river after the improvements are made. Core Requirement #2, Offsite Analysis: An offsite analysis is provided in Appendix A. • • Core Requirement #3, Flow Control: This project proposes Tess than 10,000 sf of net new impervious surface and therefore qualifies for small site review. There is no formal flow control required, however, the new home will route roof runoff through downspout dispersion trenches and the new driveway will make use of sheet flow dispersion. Core Requirement #4, Conveyance System: No new conveyance systems are being added and therefore there is no new design that is needed. Core Requirement #5, Erosion and Sediment Control: An erosion and sediment control plan will be provided at a later time when this project is farther along. Core Requirement #6, Maintenance and Operations: A maintenance and operations manual will be submitted later. Core Requirement #7, Financial Guarantees and Liability: The owner will provide this information prior to permit issuance. Core Requirement #8, Water Quality: Per Exemption #1 of Section 1.2.8, this project is exempt from a formal water quality facility because the new PGIS will be less than 5,000 SF. No water quality facility will be provided. Also, this is not a requirement for the small site review. III. OFFSITE ANALYSIS A Level 1 Offsite Drainage Analysis is provided in Appendix A. IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The below figures represent the impervious surface calculations for this project. New impervious: 2,025 sf (1 new house) 2,589 sf New driveway and parking -3.933 sf Removal of existing impervious 681 sf This project proposes Tess than 10,000 sf of net new impervious surface and therefore qualifies for small site review. There is no formal flow control required, however, the new home will route roof runoff through downspout dispersion trenches and the new driveway will make use of sheet flow dispersion. • V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN No new conveyance systems are being added and therefore there is no new design that is needed. VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES No special reports or studies are known to exist for this project. VII. OTHER PERMITS No other permits are known to be required at this time. VIII. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN An erosion and sediment control plan will be provided at a later time. IX. BOND QUANTITIES. FACILITY SUMMARIES AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bond quantities will be provided at a later date. • X. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL • A maintenance and operations manual will be provided later. APPENDIX A OFFSITE ANALYSIS REPORT Cramer Northwest, Inc. • Surveyors •Planners •Engineers LEVEL 1 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS OF ANDY JONES SHORT PLAT 13039 se AVE S. TUKWILA, WA 98178 FOR ANDY 'MINES 13039 56 AVE S. TUKWILA, WA 98178 SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 C.N.I. JOB NO. 2006-087 Prepared by Paul J Nitardy, P.E. 945 N. Central, Suite #104 Kent WA 98032 (253) 852 -4880 Fax (253) 852 -4955 www.cramernw.com E -mail: cni@,cramernw.com 1 EXPIRES 11/26/20071 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TASK1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS II. TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW 111. TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION IV. TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS V. TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS APPENDIX THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT • • • TASK1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION AND MAPS TASK 1 STUDY AREA DEFINITION This project is located at 13039 56 Ave S. in Tukwila WA. The property is approximately 0.62 acres. We are proposing that the property be divided into two residential Tots. Both lots will gain access off of 56 Ave. S from a common upgraded driveway to the southwest of the existing house. The portion of the driveway crossing the front lot will be in an easement that will give access rights to the back lot. The property has an existing home with associated walk ways which will remain. The other existing improvements that include a garage, driveway, and concrete foundations will be removed. The majority of the property is covered with grass. A few trees, along with a number of bushes also occupy the site. The existing site drainage can be divided up into two flow paths. Approximately % (the part near the river) of the property drains directly to the river. The rest of the property sheet flows from the northwest to the southeast, across a fairly flat site. No significant amounts of upstream flow enter the site. MAPS A vicinity map, sensitive areas map, aerial photograph, topo map, and offsite drainage maps can be found in the proceeding pages. w h to y 4,3 !I j S St2iTio ST S 137TH ST `. 6 S 122SrD ST g S t'$ JONES VICINITY NIAP ■ I � _ � L t • i .. Tukwila '/ / S 138T19 ST s Green RlrerTrelt3fte r ' t h e y � '�/ S 13(7731 ST H • Si grwST 6 Seattle JUMPER zri S 12 ST l e 0 0 4 0 Dtityamish`River' ., - .; :x.;.a. g shy S133T31ST S 141STST •.: 3 ST S „9TN ST S l2dtTW ST s i2. Tti ST s ' S t27TN pi Renton S MTh. sT .. � , 140 s 143731ST 0 + CO., _ s -sa3sT in � © Z d 514a1D:g 4' $J c . (CI 2005 King County o ► `T t1012ft $ Lift ST The tdonnation Included on this map has been or by staff f oma of b m Corn rte no representations or nties, s nt.mnp p , as a/ rou ri n king . d oaerrar d egdaabe eouraea and el X 07 snit idl i en n The is not blended for use as a &weyprochse straR no 9ableaar any 9 cwt ice. or miae dartmges Murth . but not drafted to: fast commas et lost framers use re Misuse a31ha inch malian csiteined this map. any aide of this map or trdormetran on Ode mph prohibited except by written pwu tot King Ce rly. Dabst maw Sourest l°'° County NAP - Property t t ounetarkr.goviGISMSP1 5 120TH ST m 4, S 13IST ST kg King County • • • JONES - SENSITIVE AREAS Highlighted Feature County Boundary Mountain Peaks CAO Shoreline Condition • Nigh • Medium Low Highways A f Incorporated Area A / Streets H ighway Arterials Local VA Legend Parcels SAO Stream Class 1 Class 2 Panamint Gems 2 Sadrnortid Class 3 Unclassified r ` ; Lakes and Large Rivers Streams Floodway ® 100 Year Floodplain SAO Wetland SAO Landslide SAO Seismic SAO Erosion The kdomtatbn included on this map has been compiled by tug County ararrety of s and is subject to doge without notice. g .unty makes no a warranties. express or aon as to aacy . time@ness or tiothe of such infOr atkm. This don awe is use as survey induct. King County stall rata Sable for any general, epeeist, bah o der tal. a damages Inctuding.but not limited to. lost revenues or lost poets resullinet herniae use or amuse of the It nation =Mined atthe map. My sale of this map or infonnahon on this map is prohibited except by written pemrsmon of King Cry Date: e52007 ' sow= King Ali NAP . Sensitive Areas gittpilwinctneIrokrgodGIShMAP) King County • i Ma ndmeaban•indudedon map Wyk w, • t ,tlattoes - andis YO 1 • • Cou makesaoreptoseo are orwaamrties,expnes Sato a. Ibis is mt ulendedfoiu®9 ass survey pmdia&.K� idol Obi bate* any genera erat peaf' daa g. but not Weed to. Lost revenues At bat prosis tronfgta t as Moist= of the ummiaaion on this map. Airy sob of this map or hdatmation on this map is prohbled except bywrdoon pontssiortot King.Couoga oat« 662007 Soomea: King Camay NAP - ttyckegraptde Intormation (tgtptilirssw ) • • The infonnation • - • on this map has • • by King County staff beim a variety of and is subject to change notice..King rtiakes no reprosentatims or earnardies. expresser implied.. as to acctracy timefinees, or dotes to lixtese of 'such Information. This Is not intended for use as a survey product tang County shallmat be liable.* anygeneral, spode!. Indirect. incidental. w coasequ oda! d a m a g e s i n d i t e & b u t not-ltd to l e s t r e v e n u e s o r l O s t p r o f i t s r e s i d e r ' s ; b a n d i t use c a n i n e ° o f th e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d on t h i s Map. Arri sate at ttis map or Infortiadlon on this map Is proNbited except by vaftten permission of King Cora*. Datm 662007 Sour= leg County NAP Hydrographic Infomedionfhtlicatwocrnetrokea&4GIS/3AAP) > 0 W O LL r Z 0 ;— 0 ti N g } F °5 •`,• W •q- ••••• / � `.. � t ■ c4 P A 41/4: jp a b. • 325W TUKWILA w OFFSITE DRAINAGE MAP , 00 ' ?/ 4)b N O V ,a`� h• / / , 3 / /// l/TH / /!NEOr . C. LE_ DONATIONjCLAIM NE NO r iZ/NE OF STEPHEN • R DONAT /ON off, / / �v°c t� / / �c /Q . 4 4 c • -23-4 • NOTE: Kroll Maps are produced tor refh these expertly drawn maps are compi and Field Surveys. absolute accuracy . • �FFMAN S- v 1„1,-,. DON CL /, A • • TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW • • TASK 2 RESOURCE REVIEW Adopted Basin Plans and Finalized Drainage Studies: This site is located in the Duwamish River Basin as per the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan. Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports: See the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan. Critical Drainage Area Maps: The site is not known to be located in any critical drainage areas. (FEMA) Maps: The 100 year flood plain encompasses a small portion of the site which is near the river. The approximate 100 year flood elevation is shown on the engineering drawings. Other Offsite Analysis Reports: None were available. Sensitive Areas Folio: See the Geotechnical Engineering Study done by Earth Solutions NW, LLC on August 31, 2007. DNR Drainage Problems Maps: Not applicable. Road Drainage Problems: Not applicable. King County Soils Survey: Information is available only from the Geotechnical Engineering Study. The study states: "Underlying the topsoil, native soils consisting primarily of loose to medium dense non - plastic silt (Unified Soil Classification ML) ". Wetlands Inventory Maps: There are no wetlands located on or near the site. Migrating River Studies: We are not aware of any particular study. Drainage Complaints: There were no relevant complaints in the area. • TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION • TASK 3 FIELD INSPECTION A field inspection was conducted on June 1, 2007 to inspect the onsite drainage system of the site. Offsite drainage systems were also inspected downstream approximately 1/4 mile(s) from the discharge points of the site. The inspection involved investigation of the ten specific items of a Level 1 Inspection per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998. The inspection yielded the following findings: 1. No existing or potential problems were observed. 2. The existing drainage system capacity was adequate. 3. There were no existing or potential flooding problems. The 100 year flood elevation is shown on the drawings. 4. There were no existing or potential sedimentation, scouring or bank sloughing problems for the bulk of the site. See Geotechnical Engineering Study by Earth Solutions NW, LLC dated August 31, 2007 for more information. 5. No significant destruction of aquatic habitat or organisms was noticeable. • 6. Qualitative data such as land use, impervious surfaces, topography, and soil types was noted and can be found in Task 4 information. 7. Information was collected on pipes, ditches, and structures. This information is also included in the Task 4 information. 8. Tributary basins delineated in Task 1 were verified. 9. The neighbor to the northeast was contacted. 10. The weather condition at the time of the inspection was sunny and warm. • • TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM DESCRIPTIONS TASK 4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM • pESCRIPTIONS • Site Drainaae This project is located at 13039 56 Ave S. in Tukwila WA. The property is approximately 0.62 acres. We are proposing that the property be divided into two residential Tots. Both lots will gain access off of 56 Ave. S from a common upgraded driveway to the southwest of the existing house. The portion of the driveway crossing the front lot will be in an easement that will give access rights to the back lot. The property has an existing home with associated walk ways which will remain. The other existing improvements that include a garage, driveway, and concrete foundations will be removed. The majority of the property is covered with grass. A few trees, along with a number of bushes also occupy the site. The existing site drainage can be divided up into two flow paths. Approximately 1/4 (the part near the river) of the property drains directly to the river. The rest of the property sheet flows from the northwest to the southeast, across a fairly flat site. No significant amounts of upstream flow enter the site. Soil information was only available from the Geotechnical Engineering Study. The study states: "Underlying the topsoil, native soils consisting primarily of loose to medium dense non - plastic silt (Unified Soil Classification ML) ". Offsite Drainaqe Off -Site Analysis Drainage System Tables are provided on the next pages that describe in detail the offsite drainage components at least 1 /4 mile downstream from the project discharge locations. Please refer to the offsite drainage maps in Task 1 because the map symbols listed in the tables correspond to drainage component symbols on the offsite drainage maps. Symbol Drainage Component Type, Name, and Size Drainage Component Description Slope Distance from site discharge Existing Problems Potential Problems Observations of field inspector, resource reviewer, or resident see map Type: sheet flow, Swale, stream, channel, pipe, pond; Size: diameter, surface area drainage basin, vegetation, cover, depth, type of sensitive area, volume % ' ml = 1,320 ft. constrictions, under capacity, ponding, overtopping, flooding, habitat or organism destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, sedimentation, incision, other erosion tributary area, likelihood of problem, overflow pathways, potential Impacts A 8" CPEP w /CB's Flows across se Ave. S. .42 0' -24' None None No problems observed ( *) B 12" CPEP w /CB's Flows south west. Small 24' -334' None None No problems observed ( *) C 12" CPEP w/ CB's Flows south east. .32 334' -515' None None No problems observed ( *) D 18" CPEP w /CB's Flows south east. .33 515' -590' None None No problems observed ( *) i P1 P2 P3 P4 Top of picture is towards the SE. Top of picture is towards the SE. Top of picture is towards the SE. Top of picture is towards the SE. Beginning of "A ". End of "A ", beginning of "B ". End of "B ", beginning of "C ". Beginning of "D ". • ( *) = SF.F PHOTO Basin: Duwamish River 98- 4\inB04 OFF -SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: • Subbasin Number: • 98- 4 \inB04 ( *) = SEE PHOTO Basin: Duwamish River OFF -SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: Symbol see map E F G Drainage Component Type, Name, and Size Type: sheet flow, swale, stream, channel, pipe, pond; Size: diameter, surface area 24" CPEP w /CB's 24" CPEP w /CB's River Drainage Component Description drainage basin, vegetation, cover, depth, type of sensitive area, volume Flows south east. Stormceptor 900 in- line. Flows south east. Flows downstream Slope 96 Small 10 Small Distance from site discharge VmI= 1,320ft. 590' -686' 686' -723' 723'- 3,023' Existing Problems constrictions, under capacity, ponding, overtopping, flooding, habitat or organism destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, sedimentation, Incision, other erosion None None None Potential Problems None None None Observations of field inspector, resource reviewer, or resident tributaniarea, likelihood of problem, overflow pathways, potential Impacts No problems observed ( *) No problems observed ( *) No problems observed ( *) AIN I no'? • P5 Top of picture is towards the SE. End of "D ", beginning of "E ". P6 Top of picture is towards the SE. End of "E ", beginning of "F ". P7 Top of picture is towards the SE. End of "F ", beginning of "G ". Subbasin Number: • Symbol Drainage Component Type, Name, and Size Drainage Component Description Slope Distance from site discharge Existing Problems Potential Problems Observations of field inspector, resource reviewer, or resident see map Type: sheet flow, swale, stream, channel, pipe, pond; Size: diameter, surface area drainage basin, vegetation, cover, depth, type of sensitive area, volume % '4 mi a 1,320 ft. constrictions, under capacity, ponding, overtopping, flooding, habitat or organism destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, sedimentation, incision, other erosion tributary area, likelihood of problem; overflow pathways, potential Impacts Al River Flows downstream Small 0- 1,320' None None No problems observed ( *) ( = SEE PHOTO Basin: Duwamish River 98- 41inB04 • P8 Top of picture is towards the SW. Picture shows the sloping land with the river below. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: • Subbasin Number: • • TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS • • TASK 5 MITIGATION OF EXISTING OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS After a thorough field inspection and a detailed resource review no existing or potential problems were found. No mitigation is required. The proposed improvements will not produce a significant impact to the existing drainage patterns once the site has been stabilized and the runoff has been controlled using downspout dispersion for the new house and sheet flow dispersion for the new driveway. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be created at the final design stage to minimize the transport of sediment -laden runoff to the downstream conveyance system. • • APPENDIX THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT • THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT The below figures represent the impervious surface calculations for this project. Net new impervious surface onsite: New house New driveway and parking Less existing impervious being removed Total 2,025 sf 2,589 sf -3.933 sf 681 sf Per Section 1.1.2, this project qualifies for Small Project Drainage Review. • • APPENDIX B BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET Note: Bond Quantities Worksheet will be submitted later. PREPARED FOR MR. ANDY JONES August 31, 2007 Wendy L. Richman Staff Geologist Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY AND PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION ASSESSMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SHORT PLAT 13039 - 56 AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ES -0993 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2881 — 152 Avenue Northeast, Redmond, Washington 98052 Ph: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-3855 Toll Free: 866 - 336 -8710 E� /�i'� NOV a h Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi- neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one — not even you — should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project - Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project- specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when its changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, Important Iolormatioo About Your Gootocboical Engineering Report Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. The following information is provided to help you manage your risks. • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes —even minor ones —and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineer- ing reportwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man -made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ — sometimes significantly — from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi- neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual August 31, 2007 Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences ES -0993 Mr. Andy Jones 13039 - 45 Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98178 Attention: Mr. Andy Jones Dear Mr. Jones: Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study and Preliminary Infiltration Assessment, Proposed Residential Short Plat, 13039 - 56 Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington ". In our opinion, the proposed short plat and residential development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Due to the presence of loose alluvial soils across the site, the proposed residential structure should be supported on conventional foundations bearing on at least 12 inches of granular structural fill. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at the base of over - excavations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or further overexcavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary. Recommendations for foundation support, infiltration feasibility and other project - specific geotechnical recommendations are provided in this study. The opportunity to be of service to you is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, 7 EA - R - TH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC lril aymond A. Cogl s, P.E. Principal 2881 152nd Avenue NE • Redmond, WA 98052 • (425) 284 -3300 • FAX (425) 284 -2855 • Toll Free (866) 336 -8710 Earth Solutions NW«c • • TABLE OF CONTENTS ES -0993 INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 2 Surface 3 Subsurface 3 Geologic Setting 4 Groundwater 4 Preliminary Infiltration Evaluation 4 Textural Analysis 4 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS REVIEW 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 General 6 Site Preparation and Earthwork 7 In -situ Soils 7 Structural Fill Placement 7 Excavations and Slopes 8 Utility Trench Backfill 8 Foundations 8 Foundation Setbacks 9 Slab -on -Grade Floors 9 Retaining Walls 10 Drainage 10 Seismic Considerations 11 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 11 Earth Solutions NW, LLC PAGE GRAPHICS PLATE 1 PLATE 2 PLATE 3 APPENDICES • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued ES -0993 VICINITY MAP TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Appendix A Field Exploration Test Pit Logs Earth Solutions NW, LLC General INTRODUCTION Earth Solutions NW, LLC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY AND PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION ASSESSMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIALSHORT PLAT 13039 - 56 AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ES -0993 This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the proposed single - family residence to be constructed to the northwest of an existing residence located at 13039 - 56 Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this study was to conduct fieldwork, perform appropriate geotechnical analyses and develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study included the following: • Excavating a series of test pits across the subject property, using a rubber -tire backhoe and operator contracted by ESNW, for purposes of characterizing the soil and groundwater conditions; • Identifying and characterizing potential critical area hazards as defined by the City of Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45 — Environmentally Sensitive Areas; • Providing geotechnical recommendations for earthwork, structural fill requirements and drainage recommendations; • Providing a preliminary infiltration assessment; • Assessing the suitability of site soils for use as structural fill; • Providing recommendations for soil bearing capacity, subgrade preparation, and recommendations for foundation support recommendations, and; • Providing additional geotechnical recommendations, as appropriate. Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 • Earth Solutions NW, LLC ES -0993 Page 2 The following documents and maps were reviewed as part of preparing this Geotechnical Engineering Study: • City of Tukwila Short Plat for Andy Jones, prepared by Cramer Northwest, Inc., dated August 17, 2007; • City of Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45 — Environmentally Sensitive Areas; • 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM); • Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SMW) • Geologic Map of the Des Moines Quadrangle, Washington, H.H. Waldron, 1962; • Liquefaction Susceptibility for the Des Moines and Renton 7.5- Minute Quadrangles, Washington, and; • King County Soil Survey (SCS). Project Description The site consists of a residential property currently developed with a single - family residence located in the southeastern portion, which will remain as part of the short plat plans. The site is also developed with an outbuilding associated with the current residence that will be removed. We understand the subject site will be subdivided to create an additional single - family residential lot and associated infrastructure improvements to the northwest of the existing structure, designated Lot 2 on the referenced site plan. Due to the low topographic relief across the majority of the site, we anticipate grading will be minimal, consisting largely of cutting existing grades to the footing elevation and constructing a level building pad. The proposed residence will likely consist of a relatively lightly loaded wood frame structure supported on a conventional foundation. Based on our experience with similar developments, we anticipate wall loads on the order of one to two kips per lineal foot and slab -on -grade loading of about 150 pounds per square foot (psf). If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to confirm that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated into the plans. M. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 Surface • Earth Solutions NW, LLC ES -0993 Page 3 The site is located on the northwest side of 56 Avenue South approximately 1000 feet to the northeast of the intersection of 56 Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The approximate location of the subject property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The approximate limits of the property are illustrated on the Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2). The site is bordered to the northeast and southwest by existing residences, to the southeast by 56 Avenue South and to the northwest by the Duwamish River. The southeastern portion of the site is developed with a single- family residence which will remain as part of the planned short plat and is designated Lot 1 on the referenced site plan. The proposed Lot 2 is currently developed with a garage associated with the existing residence which will be demolished and will be regraded to create a level building pad. The overall site topography is relatively flat, with little discernible elevation change across the development envelope. There is a slope located along the northwestern margins of the proposed new Lot 2 descending to the Duwamish River with an approximate elevation change of 12 feet and maximum gradients on the order of about 40 percent. Vegetation throughout the site consists primarily of yard grass, sparse trees and general landscaping surrounding the existing residence and outbuildings. Subsurface Three test pits were excavated within Lot 2 for purposes of assessing soil and groundwater conditions, and for characterizing and classifying the site soils. Please refer to the test pit logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. No areas of fill were observed at our test sites. However, it is possible that fill may be encountered during site grading activities, given the past development on the site associated with the existing structures. Topsoil was encountered at all of the test sites and was on the order of four inches thick. Underlying the topsoil, native soils consisting primarily of loose to medium dense non - plastic silt (Unified Soil Classification ML) deposits were encountered extending to the maximum exploration depth of 12 feet below existing grade. Laboratory testing conducted on representative samples collected during our fieldwork indicates the site soils are non - plastic and contain fines contents between 98 to 100 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 ES -0993 Page 4 Geologic Setting The subject site is located along a cut -bank portion of the Duwamish River. This system is considered a meander stream system. However, a system of levees has been constructed along portions of the alignment to control flooding. Our review of the referenced geologic map identifies areas of alluvium (Qa) deposits at the site and surrounding area. The alluvium consists primarily of silt and sand associated with overbank deposits of the Duwamish River. The King County Soil Conservation Survey does not provide mapping in urban areas of Seattle including the subject site. The soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork generally correlate with the geologic map designations, and in our opinion represent alluvium deposits. Groundwater No groundwater seepage or indications of a defined groundwater table was encountered during our fieldwork (August 2007). Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. Perched groundwater seepage should be anticipated in deeper site excavations, such as those required for utility trenches. Preliminary Infiltration Evaluation We understand the feasibility of infiltrating runoff is being investigated as part of the site development plans. The city of Tukwila has adopted the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for site characterization and design. Final infiltration designs were being developed at the time of this report, however we anticipate infiltration trenches may be utilized where feasible to retain and treat runoff generated from site development and allow it to infiltrate into the native soils. We collected representative soil samples at our test locations for laboratory analyses. Textural Analysis Textural analyses were performed on representative soil samples collected from the test sites at variable depths. The textural classifications were performed in accordance with the USDA sieve method. This classification differs from the USCS classification method in that the sand fraction of the sample is based on the minus #10 sieve fraction as opposed to the minus #4 sieve fraction used for USCS classification. The alluvium type soils encountered at all the test pit locations consisted of loam based on the USDA textural classification and contain between 98 to 100 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Based on Table 3.7 of the Department of Ecology SMWW, the loam deposits have an Earth Solutions NW, LLC ' Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 • ES -0993 Page 5 "estimated long -term (design) infiltration rate" of 0.13 inches per hour. These values were derived based on textural analyses described in the scope of services prepared for this project. In general, the infiltration characteristics of these type soils would be considered very low. The 1998 KCSWDM requires falling head infiltration testing to be conducted to determine design infiltration rates. Specifically, one test within each trench area with testing conducted at the infiltration elevation and at least one test site advanced to a minimum of five feet below to explore groundwater conditions and potential confining soil layers. If the preliminary infiltration rate provided above appears feasible, once site designs have progressed, ESNW can conduct appropriate testing to confirm infiltration rates, upon request. If the infiltration rate discussed above results in an unacceptable system design, an alternative means of treating runoff generated from site development should be considered. The 1998 KCSWDM provides acceptable design methods for sites where infiltration is not feasible. ESNW can provide alternative drainage recommendations once site plans have proceeded, upon request. No groundwater was observed at the time of our fieldwork (August 2007). However, designs should provide a minimum of three feet of separation between the trench bottoms and the seasonal high water table, which should be evaluated during the wet season. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS REVIEW As part of our report preparation, we reviewed Chapter 18.45 — Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and the online King County DPD GIS iMAP resource to identify potential sensitive areas that may meet current critical area definitions present on the subject site, and to provide recommendations for mitigating soil instability or excessive erosion to be considered in site design. Based on our review of the referenced resources, the site is not located in a Landslide Hazard Area or an Erosion Hazard Area. However, based on our review of the referenced Liquefaction Map, the site is located within a Category I liquefaction area. A Category I group includes post - Vashon alluvium and has been designated as having a high susceptibility to liquefaction. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where excess pore water pressure develops in a soil matrix due largely to seismic shaking, which causes short-term reduction or loss of shear strength. This phenomenon typically occurs in loose to medium dense silt and sand deposits at or near the groundwater table. The soils observed at our test sites were comprised primarily of non - plastic silt containing about 98 to 100 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. No groundwater was observed in the upper approximately 12 feet of our test locations. However, given the site proximity to a meander stream system, we would anticipate the seasonal high groundwater elevation to rise significantly. Earth Solutions NW, LLC • Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 Therefore, based on the soil and groundwater conditions observed at our test sites, we would characterize the site as a moderate to high liquefaction hazard area. We provide mitigating measures for foundation support and subgrade preparation later in this report. ESNW should review final site designs to confirm appropriate geotechnical recommendations have been included and to provide supplemental recommendations, as necessary. With respect to landslide hazard, while the site is not located along a sloped area, portions of the river bank along the northwestern margins of the property contain gradients on the order of 40 percent or less. In our opinion the river banks would generally be considered stable during the dry season. However, due to the relatively loose nature of alluvial and floodplain deposits, we would expect sloughing and erosion to occur during the rainy season, particularly during intense rain events. In our opinion a building buffer equal to the height of the river bank should provide adequate separation and will not increase the potential for slope instability. General DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ES -0993 Page 6 Based on the results of our study, development of the proposed single - family residential lot is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The primary geotechnical considerations associated with the proposed development include site grading and earthwork, appropriate foundation setbacks from slopes with gradients of 40 percent or greater, site drainage, foundation support, structural fill placement, appropriate erosion control and the suitability of the on -site soils for use as structural fill. Based on the results of our study and due to the presence of loose alluvial deposits across the site, in our opinion the proposed residential structure should be supported on conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on at least 12 inches of granular structural fill. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at the base of over - excavations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or further overexcavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary. The presence of groundwater seepage in deeper utility and site excavations should be anticipated, depending on depth and seasonal weather conditions. Isolated perched seepage may be encountered in excavations for the foundation depending on the time of year they are completed. Based on the data obtained from the test sites, and our overall characterization of subsurface conditions, extensive site dewatering will likely not be necessary for the proposed site development. However, supplemental recommendations for controlling groundwater seepage should be provided by the geotechnical engineer during the grading activities, as appropriate. Earth Solutions NW, LLC ' Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 • • Earth Solutions NW, LLC ES -0993 Page 7 This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Andy Jones, and his representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Site Preparation and Earthwork The primary geotechnical considerations during the proposed site preparation and earthwork activities will involve structural fill placement and compaction, site drainage and erosion control. In - situ Soils From a geotechnical standpoint, the silt soils encountered at our test sites are generally suitable for use as structural fill. The moisture sensitivity of the native soils can be generally characterized as high. As such, successful use of the on -site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils at the time of placement and compaction. Soils encountered during site excavations that are excessively over the optimum moisture content may require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction. Conversely, if the native soils are found to be dry at the time of placement, moisture conditioning through the application of water may be necessary prior to compacting the soil. If the site soils cannot be successfully compacted, the use of an imported soil may be necessary. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a maximum aggregate grain size of four inches, and a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a fines content of five percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three - quarter inch fraction. Structural Fill Placement In general, areas to receive structural fill should be sufficiently stripped of organic matter and other deleterious material. The geotechnical engineer should observe cleared and stripped areas of the site prior to structural fill placement. Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab -on- grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent, in general accordance with the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D -1557) and placed in maximum 12 inch lifts. In pavement areas, the upper 12 inches of the structural fill should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent and be in stable, non - yielding condition. • Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 • • ES -0993 Page 8 Excavations and Slopes The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Washington Department of Labor and Industries (L &I) classify soils in terms of minimum safe slope inclinations (see WAC 296- 155 -66401 Appendix A -Soil classification). Based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the loose to medium dense native soils would be classified by OSHA/L &I as Type C. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped no steeper than 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). If appropriate slopes cannot be achieved, temporary shoring may be necessary to support the excavations. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H:1 V, or flatter, and should be planted with an appropriate species of vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. The project geotechnical engineer should observe temporary and permanent slopes to confirm that the inclination is appropriate, and to provide additional grading recommendations, as necessary. Utility Trench Backfill In our opinion, the soils observed at the test sites are generally suitable for support of utilities. Organic or highly compressible soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. In general, the native soils anticipated to be exposed during grading should be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction and fines contents are within acceptable limits to maintain stability. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable specifications of the City of Tukwila, as appropriate. Foundations The soils underlying the majority of the site consist of loose to medium dense alluvial deposits. Therefore, in our opinion, the proposed residential building should be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on at least 12 inches of granular structural fill. In our opinion, this foundation support method will provide additional resistance to possible liquefaction- induced differential settlements. Assuming the building will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be considered for design of the new foundations: • Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity 2,000 psf • Passive Resistance 250 pcf (equivalent fluid) Earth Solutions NW, LLC Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 Foundation Setbacks • Friction • IBC Site Class • Liquefaction Susceptibility • Total Settlement • Differential Settlement A one -third increase in the allowable soil bearing and seismic loading conditions. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are compaction of the soils to the specifications of replacement with structural fill may be necessary. Due to the presence of slopes along the banks of the Duwamish River presumably underlain by loose alluvial deposits, for preliminary design purposes a building buffer equal to the height of the river bank should be incorporated into site designs. In our opinion, this buffer will provide adequate separation and in our opinion will not increase the potential for slope instability. Additional buffers associated with other site constraints may supersede the buffers provided in this report. Slab - On - Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors for the proposed building should be supported on a subgrade consisting of native soil compacted to structural fill requirements. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be re- compacted or over - excavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of five percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three - quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. Earth Solutions NW, LLC ES -0993 Page 9 0.30 Site Class E (Table 1613.5.2, 2006 IBC) Moderate 1.0 inches 0.5 inches capacity can be assumed for short -term wind exposed at the base of over - excavations, structural fill, or further overexcavation and Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 Retaining Walls If retaining walls will be utilized on this site, the and any applicable surcharge loads. For design retaining wall design: • Active Earth Pressure (Yielding Wall) • At -Rest Earth Pressure (Restrained Wall) • Traffic Surcharge (Passenger Vehicles) • Passive Resistance • Coefficient of Friction Additional surcharge loading from foundations, sloped backfill, or other loading should be included in the retaining wall design, as appropriate. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design, as appropriate. ESNW should review retaining wall designs to confirm that appropriate earth pressure values and drainage have been incorporated into design, and to provide additional recommendations, as necessary. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least eighteen inches behind the wall. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a less permeable (surface seal) soil, if desired. A rigid, perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall, and connected to an appropriate discharge location. Drainage No seepage or indications of the seasonal groundwater table were observed at the time of our fieldwork (August 2007). However, groundwater seepage could be encountered in deeper site excavations, particularly during the wetter winter months. Temporary measures to control groundwater seepage and surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps, as necessary. In our opinion, perimeter drains should be installed at or below the invert of the building footings. A typical footing drain detail is provided on Plate 3 of this report. Earth Solutions NW, LLC y should be designed to resist earth pressures , the following parameters can be assumed for 35 pcf (equivalent fluid) 50 pcf 70 psf (rectangular distribution) 250 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.30 ES -0993 Page 10 • Mr. Andy Jones August 31, 2007 • • ES -0993 Page 11 Seismic Considerations The 2006 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions observed at the test sites, Site Class E, from table 1613.5.2, should be used for design. Based on the review of the referenced code, the medium dense silt deposits anticipated to be providing direct support of the foundations would have a moderate to high susceptibility to liquefaction. Assuming the foundations will be supported utilizing the recommendations provided in this report, in our opinion the risk of liquefaction- induced differential settlements will be adequately mitigated. We would expect liquefaction- induced settlements to occur non - uniformly across the site, and may result in cosmetic damage to the new residence during a seismic event. If this level of damage is not acceptable, alternative foundation support methods can be considered. ESNW can provide supplemental foundation support recommendations upon request. LIMITATIONS The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test sites may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC 513 ! 14 • &J FOSTER` GOLF LINKS 139 a5t115t$>s\9 1••• X011 -f „� ` *Golden a sm o FO S h., 5 ' �sm J` , Nc942:a . . M PARK�140 St'' SsS` > rand_Central ' ! 4 1t \a*; "S<4. 142nd > St Do Silver \ A st j¢ Casing (^C_. 9p 142nd St • " ' ' ¢ ¢ > > _ ssa k<V 5 143rd Pl } , \ s :BOO 'ST g :.f . . - 5 - 144th St • \ :',.., 1 1 • ° S ',+ HAZELNUT,...... Q; PARK' + '�. ti _5 147th St_ .1 5147th St +1 St FORT ` y .n •." DENT \ . z . e ¢,y� �yi \ : S 49th 5 4 Y 15Dth S 5 t5t t hh 1� O OO \� .,. C._/ Pf' S 151St :$ `:■ ' .0. � ' 5 23 i S 1,'3 ` a'_ 1kritf c = 1S1s2P1 +' i\' ■ , d eter 10 ¢'5126 St $ 91 ° .nom : o' ... .... +si \9 Technical \l tnstitute-, S •;ti 4 ...,----- :•\ Seattle" 5 p a l i '' p S r 131St St v � /,r 3 - - , s >i S 133RD ',\�_ a , SOUTHGATE r \' Q PARK M F OSTE I Et Ete o PS `• ,�S ' . s $' , .2. 5136th Sr 5' N NI•• p 5137th_-_ S ` .n R•Q > N. .G S 1 39th _ S 139th' ¢ >S 5139th t • S 140th 1 St St $ ., Q , ; - • 141st Si , '- , - A PI S 52nd ''� — v 4 .:J N 1 2 S 138th St • ` S 142nd St .., , Foster li5 s , N, ¢ N —. rube. S 145th St. - - ...A ...___146th _st _807 v 5 148th a St sr N MI > Q¢ 151st < " - --- -- .tom 5 ,-, ,'1 St. QI N .._ 1 5 s I] t ..., -_ 50UCENjfR J St a • 75200 .zx /! .n ®A e g am ' '' , r _ _ um 22 S 156th _ St a N .Q s , 158th - - r CRYSTAL S' SPRINGS N¢ /� 3 r.. N PARK ,-7,4 44 Nv. o } } 1 ¢ �. Q A ¢ ¢ �. 159th `St 16. c am. : . . 4950 5\.. ,_'' g, CRESTVIEWo�. a 5 Q4„ 1 i PARK S %2 nd�St 162nd St y � 99 � ...s164,. St¢ W.1- • }v'¢ SS o c , s J o o c • $ : co im ¢ AQ�, i. q.1 S 166ty , 7 5167th S 166th • St 168th f3 St St Ln .n. 5159th Ln L,.n _ 5.. 166th . ?.?t* Military Rd _5 Reference: King County Map 655 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2008 St NORTH 4 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. 7 . a .n .. kO o �: S u• .n Sv aS I; 124th • S Ce ' S ~ p 7-'11,i1 ' > \ 7. J•-¢ > ( O o ° St'524 } ��1� t .el'JT KYWAY'..� ' S ',T.:- �°�°¢ l'.... S 125th sr ; :Q\• 5—K r, g.,, O S PARK '` I r n 5 \26. 4 z 126 �n • -- / Q� ` th - c 4- ... .n S 1 J a' atc ) ,00h 5,12 \-1„4:. ' .- t t r .Z 9 �' ¢i �'S ¢' 5.... . Q / 91171 . ,�S 127th m a •' s 174,4 y r "D ' S_ ^ � S N S 127th ti EP ; ' 6 t 4'S _S ¢St S1z9thst. �L¢>r°s S 129th ?t 129th PI ', 1 h ' - -' e - S St °�.a> R . ,St y 31s 0 a s 1 list 4.8G 5 -�, / actitsttCt Black P'.5- Pes TurrIVICA ,33 POND %• • S PKWY u+ ! 17L cc E ._._. _ ... t Blade Dr ' o°' A _. Baker Blvd a ' c SQ: d i c ✓ Strander Blvd 4": NIAL .. - -- _ PARK r.' STRANDER B\. Track DD. ... RD 13 lf ; 4 ;..1 E ll us T .tangac (/' S 134 . S 13Sth I BLACK RIVER FOREST Embry- Riddle Acronautica: S` t.n`tersi Seattle Center • WATERWORKS 0• �`-ze GARDENS 40..... \ a � a. ' 0.., r. T O 2 24 d. -. St BOEING LONGACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK �'�SW 16th, St Earth Solutions NW 1_Lc st onsc N WitLC onstrucLion! Monitoring cal }Sc ences : r : Vicinity Map Jones Short Plat Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 08/24/I2007 Proj. No. 0993 Checked WLR Date Aug. 2007 Plate 1 i NORTH 22 0 25 50 100 " =50' Scale in Feet LEGEND TP -3 I Old Foundation �. i / s.i / / Old (Foundation • 22 *". TPA — � — Approximate Location of ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. ES -0993, August 2007 Subject Site Existing Building NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and / or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the dient at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. TP -1 or 2 TP -2 22 Lot N. . % . •' . . N Co Earth Solutions NW iv, ! 11 tom N WLLc on" stru tion Monitorin races Test Pit Location Plan Jones Short Plat Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 08/24/2007 Proj. No. Checked WLR Date Aug. 2007 Plate 2 0993 i rti:L:. . ".1•••••••• NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. LEGEND: Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material. 1" Drain Rock 2" (Min.) Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1" Rock) SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT OT SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth Solutions NW i L Ions NWL c ng cons truction Monitoring mental 2Sciences FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Jones Short Plat Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 08/31/2007 Proj. No. 0993 Checked WLR Date Aug. 2007 Plate 3 i APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ES -0993 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating a total of three test pits using a backhoe and operator contracted by ESNW. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. The test pit logs are provided in this Appendix. The subsurface exploration was completed in August 2007. Earth Solutions NW, LLC MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50°6 OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MORE THAN SE % OF FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) .s. „ fp � b ib . II •• eLfoe GW WELL- GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES • • 30 0 0 0 00.0 O CS 0 g f ' GP POORLY- GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES ( IECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) , ; 3 • Q �� , . •;� 1 ;1 a , GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND SILT MIXTURES / ejI: I # j,Pi *#' - ,O 4 GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES S AND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SW WELL- GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SP POORLY- GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) SM SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES SC CLAYEY SAND - CLAY M IXTU RES FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS LESS THAN 50 ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS. ROCK FLOUR, SI LTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY Y CLAYS, SILTY OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGAIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY SILTS AND LIMIT GREATER HAN 50 MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLA STI C ITY, OR SILTS w...mnr.r HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS • ` "' ` • ` fr. t ,,, ,, Li.: �„ 11 PT PEAT HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS • • Earth Solutions NW LLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. Earth 2881 152nd A a lt. TEST PIT NUMBER TP -1 solution, R edmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 NK'u_c Telephone: 425 - 284.3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Andy Jones PROJECT NAME Jones Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER 0993 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 8/14/07 COMPLETED 8/14/07 GROUND ELEVATION 20 ft TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION --- LOGGED BY WLR CHECKED BY WLR AT END OF EXCAVATION — )TES Depth of Topsoil AFTER EXCAVATION — (8) Hid30 cl SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS •s I GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ _ - - 5 MC= 15.90% Fines = 99.90% MC = 20.60% MC= 19.60% Fines = 100.00% ML Brown SILT, loose, moist - becomes medium dense 9.0 11.0 _ _ Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet. Earth Solutions 111. W TEST PIT NUMBER TP -2 Ea rth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. So I utio n. Redmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 NW' lc Telephone: 425 - 284 -3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Andy Jones PROJECT NAME Jones Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER 0993 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 8/14/07 COMPLETED 8/14/07 GROUND ELEVATION 20 ft TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — IGGED BY WLR CHECKED BY WLR AT END OF EXCAVATION — )TES Depth of Topsoil AFTER EXCAVATION — (8) H1d3J oI SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS •S GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - - 5 MC = 22.50% MC = 23.50% Fines = 100.00% MC = 21.30% ML Brown SILT, loose, moist - becomes medium dense 8.0 12.0 - - Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. Furth 'Solution NW.i.c CLIENT Andy Jones Earth Solutions 2881 152nd Ave N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 PROJECT NAME Jones Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER 0993 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington TEST PIT NUMBER TP -3 PAGE 1 OF 1 DATE STARTED 8/14/07 COMPLETED 8/14/07 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY WLR NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4" CHECKED BY WLR GROUND ELEVATION 20 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — AT END OF EXCAVATION — AFTER EXCAVATION — TEST PIT SIZE Ur"' 0 5 10 TESTS MC = 18.20% MC = 9.40% MC = 14.70% Fines = 99.90% y U ui D ML 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 12.0 Brown SILT, loose, moist - becomes medium dense 8.0 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. 4 1 COPY 4 COPIES • • REPORT DISTRIBUTION ES -0993 Mr. Andy Jones 13039 - 45 Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98178 Cramer Northwest Inc. 945 North Central, Suite 104 Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Ms. Ale Kondelis Earth Solutions NW, LLC Cramer Northwest, Inc. {PID= CNI04 -JAC} 945 N. Central, Ste. #104, Kent, WA., 98032 If Found Please Call Us At 1- (800)- 251 -0189 Monday, November 26, 2007 8:55:59 AM ANDY JONES SHORT PLAT PROJECT: C: \TModel\ Projects \2006 \2006 087S 10 26 0 LOT 1 PT.# DESCRIPTION BEARING 1007 1075 1076 1009 1007 Closing latitude = 0.00000 Closing departure = 0.00000 Closing bearing = N90 ° 00'00 "W Closing distance = 0.00000 Total traverse length = 428.00 (428.00) Total error of closure = 1/999999 Error of closure in latitude = 1/999999 Error of closure in departure = 1/999999 Area Area N54 ° 56'11 "W N35 ° 03'49 "E S54 ° 56'11 "E S35 ° 03'49 "W DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION 180427.4421131286523.164854 114.00 ft 180492.9334631286429.854174 100.00 ft 180574.7849371286487.302726 114.00 ft 180509.2935871286580.613407 100.00 ft 180427.4421131286523.164854 = 11400.00 sq.ft. = 0.26 +/- ACRE • Cramer Northwest, Inc. {PID= CNI04 -JAC} 945 N. Central, Ste. #104, Kent, WA., 98032 If Found Please Call Us At 1- (800) --251 -0189 Monday, November 26, 2007 8:55:59 AM ANDY JONES SHORT PLAT PROJECT: C: \TModel\ Projects \2006 \2006 - 0875 10 26 07.pro LOT 2 PT.# DESCRIPTION BEARING 1075 1016 266 7.91 268 9.48 1018 1076 1075 Closing latitude = 0.00686 Closing departure = - 0.00234 Closing bearing = S18 ° 49'05 "E Closing distance = 0.00724 Total traverse length = 515.76 (515.75) Total error of closure = 1/71201 Error of closure in latitude = 1/75222 Error of closure in departure = 1/220735 Area Area N54 ° 56'11 "W N51 ° 39'32 "E N68 ° 00'32 "E N61 ° 47'42 "E S54 ° 56'11 "E S35 ° 03'49 "W DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION 173.88 ft 180492.9334631286429.854174 180592.8250061286287.530830 59.73 ft g180629.8780321286334.378949 16.57 ft g180636.0828801286349.743348 32.31 ft 133.27 ft 100.00 ft = 15637.61 sq.ft. = 0.36 +/- ACRE 180651.3534801286378.216930 180574.7917941286487.300390 180492.9403201286429.851837 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -SS Planner: 3\o c { c c (3 e3o r` File Number: t 7 -- ()S9 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: Lo - DC • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplana,,ci.tukwila.wa.us • APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 2-.V YO 0 — 00S U SHORT PLAT (P -SS) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, R r • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlappine r development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Address: 14 n • I",,e / r e 4 INS" �� I Phone: 25 3 . ' s FAX: 2 53 . � Name: E -mail: W- &Q I AA) 0.0it/d Signature: Date: f 1, UV � 1/19d P:\Planning Forms\Applications ortPlat- 6- 06...c December 4, 2006 l ° 2001 C � •�=�°dT 120 NA 9.1 1 4 5 7 2 120 120 1.3 2 1 6 5 5 260 260 0.0 1 2 4 3 1050 1050 0.0 4 14 4 4 1 0 140 1.5 5 5 3 3 1 0 140 1.5 9 4 19 21 18 2625 2625 28.5 120 235 2.6 15 2 1 1340 1340 14.6 840 840 9.1 1 4 5 7 2 ?90 +135/ ;3290 +135 /un 48.9 1 8 6 4 4 260 260 2.8 1 2 3 1050 1050 11.4 1 2 2 1 1 840 1330 14.5 1 3 3 1 1 1340 1340 14.6 61 118 95 71 1 540 540 5.9 1 4 5 7 2 1875 2685 29.2 1 8 6 4 4 540 540 5.9 1 2 3 2100 2100 22.8 3 3 2 1 1 NA 370 4.0 1 3 3 1 2 135 135 1.5 61 118 95 71 95 420 630 6.8 3 7 4 12 11 105 210 2.3 6 3 9 5 1 1050 1050 11.4 1 1 3 2100 2100 22.8 3 3 2 1 1 2685 2685 29.2 2 1 6 8 525 525 5.7 1 1050 1050 11.4 17 20 17 22 18 1340 1340 14.6 1 1340 1340 14.6 2100 2685 29.2 4 6 5 2 Land Use Permit Cost Recovery Proposal - Permit Retainer Permit Type Administrative Review (P- Admin) Accessory Dwelling Unit Inspection Code Interpretation Legal Lot Verification Noise Variance Shoreline Permit Exemption Zoning Verification Letter Annexation (P- Annex) Land Use Appeal (P- Appeal) Binding Site Improvement Plan (P -BSIP) Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation (P- BLA/LC) Boundary Line Adjustment Lot Consolidation Zoning Code Amendment (P -Code) Comprehensive Plan Amendment (P -CPA) Conditional Use Permit (P -CUP), Shoreline CUP Development Agreement (P -DA) fee for 20 H review time Design Review (P -DR) Administrative Public Hearing Major Modification Minor Modification - new fee SEPA Planned Action (P -PACT) Permanent Sign (P- Psign) • Planned Residential Development Administrative (P -APRD) Public Hearing (P -PRD) Pre - Application Meeting (PREAPP) Rezone (P -R) Reasonable Use Exception (P- Sensitive Area Master Plan Overlay (P -SAMP) SEPA Environmental Review (P -SEPA) SEPA Checklist SEPA EIS Fee Shoreline Environment Redesignation (P- ShoreD) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (P- Shore) NG H: \Budget \Budget.xls 2010 Review Est. Fees Hours at Review Retainer Number of Permits LDR Other Zones $92 Hours Hours 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 04/06/2010 260 400 4.3 4 8 1 18 2 260 400 4.3 4 1 3 1 6 260 400 4.3 2 5 3 3 1 260 400 4.3 9 6 4 _8 2 260 NA 0.3 2 4 1 2 4 260 400 4.3 3 5 6 7 5 840 1785 19.4 1 4 3 3 1 265 265 2.9 4 8 1 18 8 540 540 5.9 4 1 6 4 6 2685 2685 29.2 2 1050 2100 22.8 4 8 12 18 8 2100 2625 28.5 8 6 6 4 6 330 +135/ X3830 +135 /un 55.4 2 330 +75 /41330 +75 /uni 21.7 25 25 0.3 6 4 1 2 4 75 75 0.8 29 57 51 50 59 840 1785 19.4 1 4 3 3 1 2685 2685 29.2 2 Special Permission (P -SP) Cargo Container Landscape Requirement Deviation Parking Variance, Modification or Waiver Sensitive Area Deviation, Buffer Reduction Single Family Design Standard Exception Sign Modification or Area Increase Parking Lot Restriping - not in code, new fee Short Plat (P -SS) 2 -4 Lots 5 - Lots Subdivision Preliminary Approval (P -SUBP) Subdivision Final Approval (P -SUBF) • Tree Permit (P -Tree) - Fee is codified at $25 Temporary Sign Permit (P- Tsign) Zoning Code Variance (P -VAR) Unclassified Use Permit (P -UU) Wireless Communication Facility (P -Wire) Minor Administrative Major or Height Waiver • $3 $1 NG H: \Budget \Budget.xls 04/06/2010 • • City. of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Soutticanter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98185 ,•Telephone.'(206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3685 • E- mail.. LukplanOtukwila.wa.us SIIQ.RT PLAT NUMIER L07 -089 DECLARATION:. • MOW ALL HEILIBI 114ESE.Pf1E&NT 144544,• THH, .U)momoian. 00102(5) IN DAL SIMPLE M THE TAM HEREIN DESCRIBED CO 1Kraer WAKE A SHORT SIlBON610N 11Ewor PURSUANT TO RP/ 5817.060 AND ACMPIREDGE 1/MT IMO SumN4ON 5NAL NOT BE 4LM11101-OMDCD IN AM. aveaR.T77404 A P(I4D0 a 714E YEARS. FRON DATE OF REOORD; 1HOUT O(•P901G Of a.411A. PIN. T(6ru1 .n9OHER DECLARE.TD6 SHORT PAT TO DE THE yNATt0C REPRESENTATION IT 5v0 PPM SIPME ON AND 11K 5AIE 6 mar MYTH DIE FREE COMMIT AND m A000571 6E Wm. TIE DESIRE OF THE On4N(5). IN WTT1ESS WE HAVE ST OUR 4464)145 AND SEALS. / G.. NAME 1 MO M 45 A. JONE6 KRISTIN MICHELLE, KOTLAN STATE OF WASHINGTON -- - - . COUNTY OF MG -y-� ON T195 OAT PERSON/111Y APPEARED BEMIRE NF 1 f'LUL1E'4''S 7-GMT 1 S TO ME MOWN TO BE DE INRADUAL WHO EXECUTED THE raw AQI FORFCOMC INSMWEID AND m Ab0404IEDG11u1 NE/SHE WED THE SAME AS HE /HER wr4laAR(41.. ND 'D® FOR THE RASES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. GWEN ENDER MY HAND AND 01010AI. SEAL 1 � DAY Of 0.$ za1C �1 DEVELOPER /OWNER INFORMATION: DIOIMS A AWES 13079 56171 AYE14I14 SOLIDI TUIOmA, WA 90778 206 -7MS-2595 NAME AS COMMISSIONED• `XLts . L 134 UGIC TTnE ! L %un. S L��lc L -r.4,1 0 APPOMIMEIN DETERS. (U 11'14'6 I STATE OF WASHINGTON GO1O110 or 1714 ON TINS DAT PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFUE.10 _ TO ME KNOWN TO BE DE INUIVG9L N110.0EL1RED THE WITNN MD FOREGOING 114178411017 AND ACKNOMEMm THAT E (06(9.THE SAE AS 105/14(4( VOWN7ARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES MEI PUPP05E5 TFEEE]N 4aNDM®. • GWE11 CINDER NY WAND N1D O/7NY1'SEAL 1)05 OAT OF:: YO_ SOH LIRE • NAME AS FDtoesso 0 MY APwummR15i"P FS LAND SURVEYOR'S CERT! ICATE: . L. • M 111E STATE of WASHINGTON. TON. WIRY 1 HIS RAT LS BASED ON AN SURVEY 06.174E LAND • DESCRIBED HERTM. CONDUCTED BY •7 OR UNDER 60 SUPERVISION; THAT TIE DISTMEM3,' C00RSE5 AND MORES ARE 5110WN HEREON CORRECTLY; AND THAT MONUMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE MONUMENTS APPROVED FOR SETTING AT A LATER DATE. )AYE BEEN SET AND LLD CAS STARED ON THE GROUND AS DEPICTED ON THE RAT. TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL: MEWED AID APPROVED m DIE SHOED SUBDIVISION C0IMITIEE AND HEREBY CERTIFIED FOR RUPP iH DAT Dr Q{r.') 2D.L_n V SUMMON COMMITTEE SURVEY IN N•E• 1/4 OF N,W__1 /4 OF SECTION 14 , T._ 23 N„ R._ 4 E., W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Mill l _��GOOII 20100402900006 4)0245 ONES SRI 436.08 IMO 26� COMP, 1 5UP1. OF RECORDS AND BRR016 APPROVALS KING COUNTY MINCE 044101 CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT FOR THOMAS A. JONES LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N.W. 1/4, AND IN THE N. W. 1/4 OF THE N. W. 1/4, OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANCE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON H CUPP'VI4T,Y1 PROPERTY TAUS ARE PAID AND 1941 A DEPOSIT HAS BEEN NINE IN 5)074CENT :AMOUNT To PAY' 114 unS FOR THE MC OW9IC YEAR THAT THERE ART NO 04)1810111141 SPUME ASSESSMENTS GEMMED TO THIS CP=C FM COLLECTOR AND THAI ALL SPECIAL AMESSO 1115 ON NO OF 1141/OROPERn HEREIN DEDICATED AS !O4475, ALLEYS. OR FOR ETHER PUEUC USE A5(41.4)474(4 1H05� �•• DAY Of 20 KO4.'0001D'Y MEASURER KING PEWIT. ASSEUDRS Appel* Ow9140 Im APPRO.m 041444 ocaarMii)h rT, A 5(SSHENrs EROS 2•.01- DAYOi1Z1fu� :.LIRYr] W.r. DEPUTY KING COMITY TREASURER 'ASSESSOR PARCEL 111.46ER(5) : -' 21,7200 -0050 PARENT PARCEL LEGAL. DESCRIPTION :: • T R A C T S 10 AND F 1 or 500060 AiOrrroN EAST Rti•L70TON C6t0a Tr1ACl5. ACCORDING 10 Na PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN WI U11E • 12 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 79. RECORDS of RING COUNTY. WASl(INGTON EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF AS'.7w82421 PIA77fD LYING BELAY DIE LINE OF ORDWAY HKGIL WATER OF DIE DUITALI4 ) RNER. IVOLUME 276 PAGE 2.233 VICINITY MAP NOTE- SEE PAGE 3 OF 3 FOR NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS. EXCEPTIONS OF RECORD: (PER STEWART TITLE 044RVOY COMPANY 5Umn10N GUARANTEE NO. SG -2631- 12202) T. ANY CUESTON THAT PUT AR54 DUE TO THE SHIFTING AND/OR CHANGING IN INT COURSE OF INF OLIIYAMi51 RIVER 2. RICHT OF 114E STATE' OF WALMICTON IN Arm 70 TEAT PORION, 10 ANT. OF DIE PROP(N7Y HEREIN DESCRIBED LODEN ILLS BELOW THE UNE OF ...ORDINARY H144* )INTER OF THE DUWAM6H RIVER 3 MOMS or DE GEI/L7AL P71BUC TO THE uNRESTRECrm USE or AL THE WATERS QE .A AMICABLE .BODY OF WATER NOT ONLY FOR THE PROMPT PURPOSE a (uOVATION. EAR ALSO FOR COROLLARY PURPOSES. INCLUDING (Bur NOT D T0) FARING. 001494G. 0VWA6, "SVOITOPM. WATER 5KUNG AND OTHER .0E4A740 RECREATE0NAL AS M OSE ;WA R5 MAY AFFECT DE memos. sraRELANDS 05 Appp4D4G� AND WHETHER 1HE LEVEL OF WATER HAS BEEN RASED NA- 11' OR ARNLg4LY TO'A 4410.404054741 FLUCTUATING LEVEL AL AS FURTHER DEFINED BY:7HF OFb51ON'AI IAN OF THIS 11AT[ (AFFECTS AL OF 7IE- )'REMISES SL7BECT.10 SUCH smut71GENCW 4. RLSINATMMS, CORM//NS. MD:CAPONS.. NOT6, EASEA*LNHS 4140 PROI'@0L6•. O0IMATEO 4710/0R DESCRIBED ONYNE PAT REIOR0(0 IN MLUWE 1T06 175 AT PAGE 77)"79 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. • THIS— DAY OF AND RECORDED IN MTV, WASHINGTON. OW11(8( » THOMAS A. JONES ADDREss.13039 56TH AVENUE SOUTH PHONE: 205- 743 -2595 p(y. TUKWILA STATE•WASH7NGTON_ pP18I78 DEVELOPER /OWNER INFORIFAD0N. • 110MA5 A JONES 13039 58714 AVENUE SOUTH 106X714 WA 98176 206 -7u -2595 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY J.A.C. O.B.H. DATE Cramer North Beet 544Y.YRTS 94armors . • aml"." .'.943 M. CENTITAI, 51E. /104, KEN; 4424 96032 E- snIO s.mr.cw7A' .. (2sajes•5!eea<MWL) - 4{499)25 -01a0 (1441 Ir..).:(254)051- 495atie,):.; SCALE 3/8/2010- 1' =20' ::108 NUMBER 200¢ -0875 SHEET 1 Of PROJECT 161E NOY ..ONES SNORT RAT 1/0 AE SONIST E //IMF TEa TED, An 22 72.4:7 2006 / /Pay. Pm. Mm Mar 06 14:2x45 20I11MNInu TARN. AY,. a 21)74 74.45.22 C.\ MANIA\7T.Hecb\200 O07s- 114- z9- 07.P.o 1/ • City of Tukwila DepaTtzt)ent of Community Development .'8300 Soufhcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone' (206) 431 -3670 FAX (208) 431 -3665 E -mai. " tukplanOtukwila.wa. us SHORT PLAT NUMBER L07 -089 GRAYHjC SCALE Nu IR RI im • 20 0 20 BASIS' OF BEARINGS; (NAIL 83/91) O ILUMEH:>;M)wo IIEIEON ARE BASED on Off uns'BEnrtd WSWT MONOMEIfs 3/0.1 AIMQ- .3/04. 941079 - ROOD) 32'22'50" .'. EAST (MID 83/91), NOTE: I. MONUMENTS IASI VISITED 12- 29-00. 2. TIE AREA OF LOT 2 8815 ES/ADMICED SY CALCULATING THE SW/MASTERLY MAIM OF STE DUTAMLS E RISER PER AROUND 5M1TS MAIN UN 11- 2 / -OR. REFERENCE SURVEYS: 1. EAST MERTON SHOES IRACIS, INI ILmnon. AcoaraOJC 70 nE PLAT norms RECORDED w VALVED 12 OF RAISN, PALE A. RECORDS OF MG (CURE, InE9INCION. 1 RIVERSIDE PORN REPUI OF A PORTION SE FAS7 AIYE97177V DARREN TRICIS DID WIXOAM) ACCORDING 1D THE PRAT ,,es >F RECORDED M lest E 701 OF PLATS, PAGE 75 REARM OF DAD COUNTY WASNRCTON. S RECORD GF ARMY RECORDED M BOOM 56' 5558.751 PAGE IDE INNER Id'LGIO9O.7KI 1400889001. RECORDS OF KING COMM. . RASENGTOV. 1. ammo OF SUT8Y RECORDED • 010 107 OF SERVE/s, PACE 31, UNDO? 40279(918. N0 200401229LK009. RECORM OF 060 COMM • IOt9�PR:IDN. S IT CF SowM1' REO(9109 M BOOR 199 Dr OMENS. PAGE 141. REMO:M .NO. 200881199999, OF A910 COUNT, IeLVeAGrcw. .. • ® MAW MOMIMENI'A$_DERSRBED • SET 1/2 FORAR w/ G1P Y9M-.4(WNNF' " " o FOUND IRON PIPE OR REM AS DESCRIBED 71d1M1 POLE p TEIIPNDNE 0IM10L£ e IEIIPNQIE RISER ® MAD No0 • WATER VALVE • TR HYDRANT ® WATER METER ® [AIM HAWN ® SANITARY SEWER MWIIOL£ INSTRUMENT USED: GEOMETER RID ARAN Moir 58835588. METHOD: 11MET0E ELEIDM6 IRIS 00 WAG 332 -130 -098. INDEXING DATA: N.E. I/4. N.W. I/4, SIC. 14 123 TORTS Cl CAST, W.M. SEr'i/1 woo 9/ cw.Ow 7RpDIE" MY' SE. ST 111LrD:R10:FAr1'h]'KR TRAC 0045 MILOING 2172 CGROVB T 7ORI�71LT OMSLDI( MICE 1106 NF. LF LRE for 2 13,638 S0. FT. SEP 55'11 E 2.19/ - H J ' "W 154 B51111 20729 • • I LIMMEL': • sr7AA 1LR PRIMPS ' 7 EASEMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: TICS SNORT anionA9N1 CONTAINS AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS. EGMSS AND UMIRES FOR DE BEREFT( OF TIE OWNERS OF LOTS AND 2 OF DOS SHORT SUBMMON. OMIENSMP OF SAKI LOTS 1 AND 2 MOM TIAS SHORT SU13UY19DN 117101 ES AN EOUV. AM MOWED D RLWAISIUCDY NOR TOE EWNTENANLF a SAO D.A.41EMS AND DE CONSTRUCTION. M INTENNNGI; REPNR AND REPLACEMENT OF WIPROVEMENIS CONTAINED INEREIN. TREE LEGEND: CONFER TREE Ag DECIDUOUS /NEE 11 12 WELT T2 Ir HOLLY T3 18 DARE 14: III PLUM 75: IT COT15701000 T6 3.2" HOLLY 1 (1 e' war T9. 3 CHOIR I6"-24 T70 r ALDER 711 2LY MAPLE 7I2 20' EIAR.E Tli ID' MAPLE 1I4 14 FIR rP6 15_ (2) 1 TREES SITE TI 7. 01171.E rte. V1 RE MAPLE 120 VINE MARE 120 6110E 81171 525 Cna 8804 CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT FOR THOMAS A. JONES LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N. W. 1/4, AND IN THE N. W. 1/4 OF THE N. W. 1/4, OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTE :, :' Turas n2 BE PRESERVED 7IEsLaN1 ro KRMIA MUHICIPK POE z IEBI6,I CEP OM 1015' _. •7.) ' SEl -e - 51.0 D_ NOEAI7 711470 VERTICAL DATUM: NORTH AMEIRCAN vtiro71C DATUM a' 1088... NOTE. NAND ELEVATION IN FEE Syl EAMLS A0.0 1929 ELEVATION M RFI BENCHMARK - `:. . WASHINGTON STAG 00.5. MONUMENT NO. 37171 DESCRIBED AS A WSDOT BRASS 051( CEMENTED MD A MO NOCE AND SET LEVEE (7717 IRE CONCREIE SURFACE LOLAIED M ME PAVED ARE BETWEEN TICE ROWEL-MUM LANE OF SR. 5 AND IRE W RAMP FROM MIERLWSIN AVENUE ELEVATION- 25.99 U.S FEET OWNER(5): THOMAS A. JONES ADDRESS 13 039 56TH AVENUE SOUTH PHONE, 206 -743 -2595 TUKWILA TRAGt 72 2 17 2 00- °° 934 55 11E2,727 WOOING SW77nE5 {, DRAWN BY alY. STATE. WASHINGTON 2Ip. 98178 1578.17 NINE: AMOY AWLS SNORT MT C/o ALE AMCFE15 /JLTGIELC 1LN, Awl EI ,294:17 200, /flee CHECKED BY , AST RIV GARDEN A pO. znO PG 79) (VOL. I z. MN *MOM) 010170£ ORIEIIT SUEAL£ 15 71I SE COE4EIE0 IN CIMUCTBM NM MITE MILDEW FGWIT 7511 LA 2 OF TIM GMT 11171 AFT 081158 MEW G UTILITY 11939417 - RR LE, /0.2.0/00q1 2 ADDR,SS SIGN NOTE: . - ...._ AN:ALDOESS SON FOR 107 1'$TWL SE RIICFD M A LAOTIAN CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM 50731 AVENUE-50E0N. _tOT 2 S RESPONSl&E FOR 115 MAINTENANCE ANa 711E LIST OF RI7'HR 940 /0R' WINE 1191C£ OF SAID. ADORE SS • STPE BENCHMARK 0 srEar ADOO ANE STY M DE 8L RACE OF_' 'WEE _IMP"' POLE .- LOCATED AT:Y/C SE. CORNER OF THE PARENT PARCEL. . EILVAITOtt; 20.1 I U.S..VEET J.A.C. 0.B. H. 1m1EL DifEDAY SSD 47;611 US. TEAT 1GEhE lU[9 V W SSIH AYE. S. $ Y S5455'110 s,i isYF>: pP.ao' 1' tb *AD tom SRO WI EDT z --- tt SURVEY IN N.F. I AA Of N.W. F / OF SECTION, r 23 W.Y., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 11429 11;100 SQ_` LNIMINC EFINE R/6 10' NE. OF EVE NE. Em ST 11000547 03`01' NE. ST LDE OO 7 4' OsMUM 704E LEWIS N. TO LB' 17104 11811017 030E9 DATE S 3/8/20 1 " =20' MEWL INVEN17 1 -� I VOLUME"7,70 PAGE 22. SHEET 6 ei 2 O1r' 3 88 Lm 9 . .. .. .. . Cramer _ Northwe$t Inc. Surveyors .,' Planners •- & Engineers '945 N. CENTRAL. STE. 9101. 91175 4'A 88032 F. - ;MALE: eel0e,am.m.,FIRl (263;n2,IR610 (7419) W t- (588)251 -9109 No NINA (23 8- 4951 .ROB NUMSLR 200$ - 0875 LOOT.' N.^ w 96 141707 79,9/RU,rle' Mm. w. 4 2570, 14263/ EIVIAN 7Ifl r1r LYW9524M -L S -To -01-0 • .0 Os OS •• 3 City of Tukwila Danaknunit of Community Development 8300 Soutficenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 .Telephone(206) 431-3870 FAX (208) 431-3665 E - Lukplan@tukwila.wa.us SHC)-RT PLAT NUMBER L07-089 . • • •. .• ••• . • • ' • • • .• • • • • • NEW LNG DE4'6RIPT10111 • • LOT A PORTON or TRAITS 10 AND.T1 OF SE AMNION EAST RIVERTOWRARDElf TRACTS. ACCORDING TO. THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF-PLATS. PAGE 79. RECORDS OF • BEIONMNG AT THE MOST SMITHERL`c.00RNER Of SOD TRACT II; THENCE NORTH 585611 WEST. ALONG THE SCUTHWESTERLV THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 114.00 FEET: THENCE NORTH .3511.1 EAST. A DISTANCE OF 'LOOM FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY UNE Or SOP TRACT 10: THENCE PTA/TIE 545811 EAST. ALONG SAO NORTHEASUR,f UNE, ..•' A DISTANCE OF I14 00 FEET TO TIT NORTHEASTERLY GORAERsOR• SAID TRACT 10. SAID CORNER BEING ON THE MORPH/EMORY MARGIN OF 56TH AVENUE SOUTH. THENCE SOUTH 35 *EST, ALONG SAID NORTIIWESTERLY HAMAR A DISTANCE OF /00.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF 13MENNING; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS. EGRESS AND UTILITIES RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. RECORDS OF RENO COUNTY. WASHINGTOW SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EMMA, COUNTY OF RENO STATE OF WASHINGTON • • • . . . LOT 2: ••• • • • • . . A PORTION OF TRACTS 10 AHD 11 OF SECOND ADDMOH • RIVERTON GARDEN TRACTS.BCCORDING TO WE RAT 71 • RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS. PAOC REECTRETS.'OP KING COUNTY, WASTRAGIDA. DESCRIBED ABE .. . • ' COMMENCING AT THE-MOST SOUIHECSIY CORNER OF ...PM TRACT Ti, THENCE NORTH sow, l' WEST. DIE SOUDIBESTER UNE THEREOF. A OF Tt4.00 FEET TO BiE POINT .;.• OF OFISNIWINGs THENCE COMINUING A090 THE AD SODVII UNE. .... .' NORTH 54881 r NEST. A DISTANCE FEET: • • • - THENCE NORTH 81:3932 EAST. A LASIANCE OF 99/2 nirma NORTH 691110 EAST. A DISTANCE OF 16.57.-FECT -' THENCE NORTH 611.142 EASE A DISTANCE OF 32,3i FEET ..- TO A POINT ON THE NOITTHMSTERLY UNE OF SILT TRACT 18; THENCE SOWN 5455 EASL'AMING 61ST 1041. • A DISTANCE Or 13.127 FEET; • . . THENCE SOUTH 3803'49 HEST A DISTANCE OF 100.00 F15:7 .. •. : 70 THE POINT OF BEGINNINGS rocurita WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS. EGRESS AND UTILITIES RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO RECOR0S. OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; SEDATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA. COUNTY OF KEVO STATE OF WASHINGTON. • . owNER(s). THOMAS A, JONES ADDRESS- 13039 56TH AVENUE SOUTH PHONE- 206-743-2595 CITY' TUKWILA STATL WASHINGTON zw. 98178 CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT FOR THOMAS A. JONES LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N. W. 1/4, AND IN THE N. W. 1/4 OF THE N. W. 1/4, OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON suave( ui_t!L_I/4 or:,■! T/ OF 5EcTioN ''' R 4 E AM IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DRAWN BY J.A.C. CHECKED BY 0.B.H. •• • ... west Inc. Surveyors tanners & En sere ..945 N. CENTRAL. STE. 904, KENT. WA 98032 ,* .- E-MAIL enfileram•cnvr-cory. (293)0 82”998000001) tor 1,(400)291-0198 NO trs.),-(293)832-4199,(6) DATE 3/ 8/ 20 1 0 • SCALE l=20 I VOLUME 0 270 PAGE 22S • 209 NUMBER 206.-087S 3 Mart? NAM: ANDY ANES SHORT 821 2/0 A22 A1808119//CREATE0 61 u An 22 12D0:/2 8.06//PREV. PUN Non 608 14.2814 2010/16.022212 Yu, WA. a. 2010. 1427303 CV/A.010\ProjacIA29141.2098/-0073 30 26 07 pea