Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L92-0079 - CROONQUIST ALFRED - OFFICE / WAREHOUSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS (EIS)l92-0079 6450 south glacier street expired ALFRED CROONQUIST WAREHOUSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS (EIS) July 23, 1993 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY • Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, 'Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6007 t,, • • Mr. L. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance to construct an 80,000 square foot warehouse proposed by Alfred Croonquist Architects (File No. L- 92- 0079). We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. The facility should be designed to accommodate recycling. Opportunities for recycling aluminum, other metals, glass, newspaper, corrugated containers, plastics, office paper and other materials should be as convenient as throwing them out. Space should be provided to accommodate the storage of these materials both inside the building and at a centralized location outside the building. During the construction phase of the project, we encourage the applicant to use products made from recycled materials wherever possible. Products containing recycled materials include parking lot bumper stops, park and picnic benches, landscape timbers and sign posts made from recycled plastic, rubberized asphalt made with recycled tires, glassphalt made with ground glass, insulation and other building materials. An inquiry to a building material supplier will provide information on available products. The applicant, when considering space in the design of the building, may also want to consider processing equipment, such as a. baler; to compact recyclables. For information on recycled materials contact the Clean Washington Center in Seattle at (206) 464 -6892. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Nate BeMiller with the Waste Reduction and Recycling Center at (206) 649 -7187. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR:tky 93 -5040 cc: Nate BeMiller, NWRO Janet Thompson, NWRO 3 0 CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOAL: CONSTRUCT A 80,000 SO. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH 5,500 SO FT. OF ANCILLARY OFFICE SPACE. (SEE ATTACHED PLAN). ADDRESS GLACIER PL'& OLYMPIC AV S, LOT 4 IN SOUTHCENTER SOUTH 'INDUSTRIAL PARK. PROPONENT: ALFRED CROONQUIST • ARCHITECTS LOiCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRES 'S, St: F 1 : PARCEL :NO: 733890 -0120 SEC/TWN/RNG: SE 35/23/04 LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: L92 -.0079 The City has deterrnined .that the: proposal does not have a probable signitia:nt adverse. impact • on the environment. An environmental impact statement (Ei'S) 1s hot required' under•. RCW 43.21c:.030(2) (c) . This deci's. ion was made after. review of a completed environmental checkliSarid,other information on f i e with the lead agency, T h i s information 1'_=• available to the pub l.'ic on request. This determination is final and signed this 1 day of 1993 . R 1' Seeler, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, ':.(206) 431- 3680. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA', 98183 You may appeal this determination'-to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 93183 no later than 10 days from the above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City C1crk. and Department of Community Development. A. BACKGROUND Con No. 'Epic-File No . G-' Z &779 Fee $225.00. Receipt No. 1,tpdalL agetia, Sulahici6, 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 79,000 sq. ft. warehouse /office 2. Name of applicant: Alfred Croonquist Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and.contact person: Alfred Croonquist, 3404 One Union Square, Seattle, WA 98101. (206)682 -2690 4. Date checklist prepared: 8/27/92 5." Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction 11/1/93 Complete construction 3/20/94 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Shoreline S s tial Development application will be submitted. 4 V 0e411e44./ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Shoreline Development Permit. SEPA Environmental Checklist, City of Tukwila Des' •n Rev'-. ..lI '- 11 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi . checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 71400 5, SZ Construction of 'an 80,000 sq. ft. concrete warehousl office structlffs.__ containing_±5,433 -sq. ft. of warehouse and-4-86g sq. ft. _of office space. Site area is 202,565 sq. ft. Parking for 89 cars will be provided where Kris required. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Project is located in the Southcenter South Industrial Park. The project site is accessed from the west end of South Glacierl'lace (a cul -de -sac hand extends to the west and north of this access point. A legal description and vicinity reap are attached. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. However. the western edge_of the_.ite falls within the shoreline zone. -3- • BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT - 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other with approx. 4 -6' high levee at west side of site b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% (except levee banks 33% and 60 %) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Primarily silty sands. However a soils report precisely identilying site soils conditions has not been prepared-I6-Tate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None, to our knowledge. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate qu anti- • ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Filling to achieve the finished floor elevation approximately 4' -0" higher than surrounding grade elevations will require approximately 9500 cu. yds. of imported structural fill. Source of fill is unknown at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. Any potential erosion will be mitigated by construction procedures and site drainage and landscape systems. Evaluation for Agency Use Only g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? approximately 1.a1-55. OD AP -4- Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: site drainage system and landscaping at erosion sensitive areas. TESC procedures potentially including_perimeter ditches, filter fabric fences and erosion control pond, as required. oismon,Ai GOlvbfrwti w 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Unknown quantity of construction related dust. Speculative nature of the project precludes knowing the character of any future tenant discharges at this time. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None, to,our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The need for dust palliation during construction, which, given the anticipated season of construction, should be minimal. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Green River borders the western side of the site. No other bodies of water on site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. A portion of the building and park /circulation facilities will be within 200 feet of the river. See attached site plan. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Not to our knowledge. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff sources include roof of structure and paved site areas. Unknown quantities will be collected_ into an engineered storm drainage system with an engineered bioswale_vhich will discharge to a public storm drain line .Jn South Glacier Place. Evaluation for Agency Use Only F,Ff Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: An engineered storm drainage collection system as mentioned in c.1 above. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation ` b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. ,. ... .:::v..., ... .. ..... .. ... ..v .,,...,- I 11 ..ten• Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscape design will maximize use of native vegetation, primarily at the river levee to be consistent with other similar landscape development along the river. rapi e_tri42- be 1:0•414 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: trout and salmon assumed to be in Green River. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge, except in the larger sense that the entire Green River Valley is_part __ of the flyway for certain species of migrating birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Natural vegetation in vicinitj of the river to the maximum extent possible. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The project will utilize natural qas heating at the entire structure and electric air conditioning at office areas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. Bu'ildinq is 32' high and a minimum of 80' from any adjacent structures. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Conformance to performance requirements of the Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None anticipated. \..i n_�s��r..urt.4i,�ri ^.'.Yt:':2 r, .M sa w..:w.a• .. Mir, Irc.4 irY'n {rv.- w- rr:,r.;c,'� Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None.. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction traffic and noise during the anticipated 5 month construction period. No unusual long term noise impacts anticipated. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None anticipated. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed project site is,an unimproved vacant parcel. Adjacent parcels have been developed with warehouses, parking and landscaping, typically found in Southcenter South Industrial Park. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. L_. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CM (formerly M -1) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 20 -40. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected and uses and plans, if any: Conformance with development restrictions applicable to this zone and Southcenter South Protective covenants. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Highest point on structure is approximately 32' above adjacent grade. Exterior materials include _ painted precast concrete and aluminum storefront. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Scale, form, color and landscaping sympathetic to and similar to surrounding develop- ment. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior security lighting directed at building and parking areas - -dusk to dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Nn. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Downward directed._cut_.nff_ type lighting fixtures oriented away fro djacent — •structures were appropriate. _,J $tWL) 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Existing jogging /walking trail on top of levee at western edge of site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ..No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Accesspathways up levee band to jogging trail. -14- ,:valuation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Project site fronts nn South G1aciPr nice, a local industrial park collector strPPt ihirh connects with West Valley Highway approximately 1/4 mile to the northeast. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit is available on West Valley Highway. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? _ 89 passenger vehicle spaces provided. none eliminated; 89\required by code for the proposed development. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. An existing rail spur forms the eastern boundary of the project site and a new rail spur will be built along the east side of the building. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 10 to 30 estimated regular commuters, plus intermittent truck deliveries and pick -ups. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None other than provision) of fire protection improvements, if any, required by code Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity. natural gas_ water. refuse service,_ telephone. sanitary sewer. septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Puget Power Gas__ Washington Natural Gas Teletihone: U.S. _West f.ommuniratinns C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its •ecision. Signature: Date Submitted: p4 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO B'E COMPLETED BY APPLICANT(. - E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide a 58,000 sq. ft. warehouse with offices and associated parking and landscaping on an industrial park parcel intended for such use. ( Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Building this project pn another site_ 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The project site is available, owned by the project proposer, and intended for development as proposed. The same cannot be said for unknown alternate sites. Preferred course of action seems obvious. • ,...... F�ia.�..•..,br- i.w,ztc:ct ti:at :�avamn �!_..� tiftisSl+;Httln�ryaxckl:u� U.• csseu.. w�awe. umv+ e: a. �umwr. n4acwrsvaYt�s�r .YSR+�waw.w�...wa 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Not to our knowledge. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applicable. -23- o.r M. Evaluation for Agency Use Only LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 4 OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -45, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 7711080966; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. : • ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS ONE UNION SQUARE. BUILDING • SUITE 3404 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 • (200) 602 -2690 June 22, 1993 Mr. Ron Cameron City of.Tukwila Public Works Department- Tukwila, WA SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis & Easements per Review Comments The following items have been discussed concerning the submittals for approval by the Board of Architectural Review. It is our understanding that these items are now acceptable. 1. Traffic Mitigation Costs Per our discussion of the traffic mitigation costs on 6- 21 -92, you advised that the trip per hour calculation for a 79,000 S.F. building would be 79,000 S.F. x 1.3 = 102.7 trips per hour, with 60% heading north for a total of 62 trips at $485 /trip, totalling a mitigation cost of $29,886. The Owner will verify the north -south distribution of trips projected. The Owner is in agreement with the mitigation concept. 2. Rail Reservation A question has been raised concerning a 20' railroad reservation running through this property. This reservation does not show on the Alta survey and is not recorded. The rail has been installed at a location east of the noted reservation and an existing building will prevent the rail from being installed in the future. ' : .» ..._ ...._.. t ...Mr , Ron Cameron June 22, 1993 Page 2. 3. Easement for Trail to Dike Path There is an existing access to the Southcenter Industrial Park property including parking at the northeast corner of the park. The Ownership of Southcenter includes the 30 foot trail easement, therefore, it would seem another easement for access would not be required. If any of the above items are not acceptable, please let us know as soon as possible. Sincerely, ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS red H. Croonquist c: Diana Painter, Planning Department Jack Pace, Planning Department Jack Bennett, CPI RECEIVED MAR 1 91993 TU KWI LA PUBLIC WORKS March 17, 1993 Ms. Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner City of Tukwila Tukwila, WA 98188 ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS ONE UNION SQUARE BUILDING • SUITE 3404 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 • (206) 682-2690 SUBJECT: Project File Nos. L92 -0078, L92 -0080, L92 -0081 Ms. Shefrin, I am in receipt of your letter dated March 8, 1993. I would have expected some notice of your intent to close this file, even a phone call would have been a courtesy. Your review required taking 25 feet off the western side of the building, thus, making the project aesthetically, economically, and functionally unfeasible. The Owner has asked us to restudy the site and to provide rail service to the building. We have done this and have developed a solution keeping the building as far away from the dike area as possible. The enclosed plan provides for the front of the building to face west, in order for the office area to take full advantage of the river view, while not creating the canyon feeling of the previous submittal. The back of the building will be rail served as are all other rail served buildings in the park. We have provided a perimeter access for the fire department and truck use. Ms. Denni Shefrin March 17, 1993 Page 2 This letter will request re- instatement of the original 'application as well as a request to schedule a review meeting as 'soon as possible. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS Alfred H. Croonqui Enclosures C: Jack Pace, Senior Planner Ron Cameron, City Engineer Jack Bennett, Corporate Property Investors City of Tukwila la John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director March 8, 1993 Mr. Alfred Croonquist One Union Square Building, Suite 3404 Seattle, WA 98101 Subject: Project Numbers L92 -0079, L92 -0080, L92 -0081 for Croonquist Warehouse Development. Dear Mr. Croonquist: As you are aware, several discussions have occurred concerning the design modifications necessary prior to Design Review. These issues were identified and discussed in a letter to you from Carol Proud dated December 21, 1992 with an expressed desire to continue to work towards a successful resolution to these issues. Based on your letter dated December 31, 1992, it is staff's understanding that your client, Mr. Bennett, has requested that no further work be done on this project. To date, no additional materials have been submitted to the City. Because there has been no further effort or progress made to resolve the design and shorelines - related issues, the City can no longer maintain your files as active. You may reapply and pay additional fees at any time. You may contact me at 431 -3663 if you have additional questions. Sincerely, .; Denni Shefrin Associate Planner c: Project File No's: L92 -0079, L92 -0080, L92 -0081 Jack Pace, Senior Planner Ron Cameron, City Engineer 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 08188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665