Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2015-03-09 Item 4E - Agreement - BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Consultant with David Evans & Associates for $299,999COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Aleeting Date Prepared Gy Mayor3• review Council review 11/24/14 BG,� Intermodal Contract, Facility Access Scope of 03/09/15 BG I ' Ge ❑ Ordinance Attg Date 03/16/15 BG ❑ Other Mtg Date C:1'1"Ii[.oRl' 1 D1.1C 1 • Resolution Altg Date MIg ITEM INFORMATION ITEM No. 67 SI.\I,I: SP[)NSOR: BOB GIBERSON ORIG,INlAL. AGENDA DATE: 11/24/14 AGENDA ITI,NI TITL1? BNSF Consultant Intermodal Contract, Facility Access Scope of Project work, and Fee with David Evans & Assoc. :1011 03/09/15 Motion Date 03/16/15 ❑ Ordinance Attg Date ❑Bid Heard Aftg Date ® Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date C:1'1"Ii[.oRl' 1 D1.1C 1 • Resolution Altg Date MIg AIIg Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ Pe7R ❑ Police 11 P ' SPONSOR'S The Committee of the Whole was presented with the consultant selection and draft scope SUMMARY of work for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project on November 24, 2014 for discussion. Council comments have been addressed in the finalized scope and fee. There is a 50x1® funding agreement with BNSF for this contract. Council is being asked to approve the David Evans and Associates' contract, scope of work, and fee to perform the analysis required for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project. REVIE\X'IM BY /t COW Mtg. ❑ CA &P Cmte ❑ F &S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. U Planning Comm. COMMITTEE CI IAIR: I. Utilities DATE: 11/24/15 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/AIDMIN. CONIMIYFEE Public Works Department COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $299,999.00 $300,000.00 _ $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 13, 2015 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/24/14 Council discussion on consultant selection and scope 03/09/15 03/16/15 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 11/24/14 Informational Memorandum dated 11/21/14 David Evans & Associates' Draft Scope of Work 03/9/15 Informational Memorandum dated 03/06/15 Vicinity Map Page 13, 2015 CIP David Evans & Associates' consultant contract, scope of work, and fee 03/16/15 67 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Committee of the Whole FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY Grant Griffin. Senior Program Manager DATE: March 6, 2015 SUBJECT: BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project Project No. 99510409 Consultant Contract, Scope of Work, and Fee ISSUE Execute a contract with David Evans and Associated (DEA), Inc. to provide preliminary engineering services for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project, BACKGROUND The Committee of the Whole was presented with the consultant selection and draft scope of work for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project on November 24, 2014 for discussion. Review comments have been addressed in a finalized scope and fee estimate. DISCUSSION DEA, Inc. has provided a contract, finalized scope of work, and fee estimate to perform the analysis required for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project (see attached contract). FINANCIAL IMPACT DEA, Inc. Contract Contract Budget $299,999.00 $ 300000.00 We have a 50% cooperative funding agreement up to $150K with BNSF for this engineering analysis through City Contract No. 14 -088. RECOMMENDATION The Committee of the Whole is being asked to approve the contract with DEA, Inc. in the amount of $299,999.00 to provide engineering services for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the March 16, 2015 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Vicinity Map Page 13, 2015 -2012 CIP Info Memo 11/21/14 Consultant Contract, Scope of Work and Fee W.1PW Eng1PROJECTS +A• FEW & RS PrepcloNSF Intermodal Facelity Access I9g510409y»PE!n(o Memo Contrae1 BNSF rFA Slurry dent 69 70 t ■ N N L Is cry �! fk 77171 s 5 0(1 5 1S 9Z 1 57121 P �l E rg E (1 5 f( I�I��I1�IIi�WYiIII> iii ,l��llH�i�L�11nIY�Yll�i�ek»3 is r11 5 Primary Build Alternatives Lif 1i C z Z V] CC LS! A0 r- U 0 zZ r zm a z CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0. 1 15 tots 1'Sgs J I 'j �s 1 'fir 1 sl r r 1 V .., rf' ' id 9Gi tr f ` I ssanvl S111UJl] ' :}rJ 44 00 u 0 'u9 0 14 6 E C Zej N r13 1— i!.iii n sr nv /07 1 71 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2015 to 2020 PROJECT: BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project No. 99510409 DESCRIPTION: Identify alternative means for ingress /egress for the BNSF Intermodal Facility located in the Allentown neighborhood. Also analyze the impacts the Facility has to the community. JUSTIFICATION: Reduce truck traffic and other environmental effects experienced by adjacent residential community. Also identified as a 2013 City Priority relating to an improved environment for community livability. City Council approved funding to conduct a study which identifies impacts, provides data driven information, STATUS: and outlines potential options for mitigation leading to a reduction in the effects of intermodal operations onto the community. Council also expressed support to work with BNSF on cost estimates for alternative ingress/egress. MAINT. IMPACT: To be identified. Allentown residents have expressed ongoing concerns regarding the effects of intermodal operations for several COMMENT: years. Staff continues to work with the City's federal delegation to address the federal preemptive authority of railroads and local land use authority. FINANCIAL Through Estimated in $000's 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 133 400 533 Land (R/V ) 0 Canst. Mgmt. 0 Construction 0 TOTAL EXPENSES 133 0 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 533 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 Proposed Grant 0 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 150 150 City Oper. Revenue 133 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 383 TOTAL SOURCES 133 0 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 533 2045 - 2020 Capital Improvement Program 72 13 Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes November 24, 2014 Page 11 of 12 inspection /licensing step for the applicant. The amount charged for the licensing of the truck would not cover the staff costs to conduct the inspection. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. h. An update on the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project. Bob Giberson, Public Works Director, explained the access study is a joint project with BNSF, who has agreed to cover up to $150,000 for the site access project. The City advertised a Request for Qualifications to solicit proposals for preliminary engineering for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project on September 18 and 25, 2014, and three proposals were received on October 2, 2014. The clear consensus after review by City staff and BNSF was David Evans and Associates. After the final scope of work is developed and the fee is negotiated, the final contract will return to Council for approval. Brandon Miles, Economic Development Liaison, stated City staff is in the process of conducting a "Community Assessment Study" of the Allentown neighborhood. A goal of the City's Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Plan is to improve the livability of the residential neighborhoods. Prior to beginning the "Community Assessment," staff from various City departments conducted a door -to -door survey of the neighborhood. This was done in order to help staff understand the issues that could be part of the "Community Assessment." In early November, staff completed the first round of surveys and visited every home in the Allentown neighborhood. From that outreach, there are 185 valid responses to the survey from residents. This includes those who completed the survey and those who declined to complete the survey. Over half the residents were not home when staff visited, and staff will revisit those homes in the near future. The goal is to have a 70% response rate to the survey. Once the survey is complete, staff will return to a future Council meeting to present the results. The Councilmembers asked clarifying questions of staff on the above topic. Council President Quinn thanked staff for the update on the status of the project. i. An ordinance extending the sunset provision on the interfund utility tax. Councilmember Seal indicated this item was discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on November 18, 2014. The committee members were unanimous in recommending approval. Peggy McCarthy, Finance Director, explained staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance that would extend the sunset provision for the collection of City utility taxes to December 31, 2021. Currently a 10% tax is assessed on the revenues of City- operated utilities which is set to end on December 31, 2015. In 2013, the City recognized nearly $1.7 million of interfund utility tax receipts. If the sunset provision is not extended the City will have to consider budget reductions or alternate revenue sources beginning in 2016. The Councilmembers asked clarifying questions of staff on the above item. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. REPORTS a. Mayor Mayor Haggerton stated he attended the recent National League of Cities, Congress of Cities and Exposition conference in Austin, Texas (November 19 -22, 2014). He will prepare a written report to be distributed to the Council. Council President Quinn suggested Councilmembers who have items to report on submit the reports in writing to the Council Analyst. Due to the lateness of the hour Council dispensed with reports. 73 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Committee of the Whole FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: Grant Griffin, Senior Engineer DATE: November 21, 2014 SUBJECT: BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project Project No. 99510409 Consultant Selection & Draft Scope of Services ISSUE Discuss consultant selection and draft scope of work for preliminary engineering services for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project. BACKGROUND The City advertised a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to solicit proposals from consultants to provide engineering services for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project. The RFQ was advertised in the Seattle Times and the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce on September 18 and 25, 2014 with submittals due on October 2, 2014. This is the first step in eventually reducing truck traffic on residential S. 124th Street. The intended scope of work for this phase of the project is to develop alternatives, perform an evaluation of each alternative against specified criteria, solicit input from stakeholders and the community, and select a preferred alternative for implementation, DISCUSSION Three engineering firms submitted Statements of Qualifications (500) for City review. A panel comprised of City staff and BNSF staff reviewed and scored the submittals. Each person reviewing and scoring the SOQ's rated the same firm as the highest among the submittals. Subsequent discussions between the panel members concluded that this clear consensus negated the need for interviews as interview scores were unlikely to change the ranking order. David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) was the highest rated firm. DEA attended a scoping meeting with the City and has provided a draft scope of work (attached). Below is the scoring matrix with the results of the SO0 review: Total Score David Evans and Associates, Inc. 285 points H.W. Lochner 272 points TranTech Engineering 266 points FINANCIAL IMPACT Once the scope of work is finalized, a fee will be negotiated and the contract will be presented to a future COW for approval, OTHER The City is also conducting an Allentown survey that is assessing a wide range of quality of life issues, including crime, neighborhood infrastructure (sidewalks, street lights, etc.), traffic, animals and safety. City staff has completed its initial canvass of the neighborhood and is preparing a second visit to outstanding homes. The survey will be completed in December and staff will present the findings to the City Council early next year. The survey will be used to lay the groundwork for a future Allentown Community Assessment Study. RECOMMENDATION Discuss the consultant selection of David Evans and Associates, Inc. to provide preliminary engineering services for the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Project. Attachment: Draft Scope of Work WWW Eng1PRQJECTSW RW & RS ProjeGsISNSF Intermodal FaciYy Access (99516409j1RFOolo Memo BNSF IAP Consult Select RT gl BM-SG mod dock 75 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Contract Number: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and David Evans and Associates Inc., hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform professional engineering services in connection with the project titled BNSF Intermodal Facility Access. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending June 30, 2016, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than June 30, 2016 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $299,999 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 77 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal. state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, to the extent arising out of or resulting from the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.1 15, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non- owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. CA revised : 1 -2013 78 Page 2 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an additional insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not Tess than A :Vll. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised - 1 -2013 Page 3 79 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. CA revised : 1 -2013 80 Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: David Evans and Associates, Inc. 415 -118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005 18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties, DATED this day of , 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA CONSULTANT By: Mayor, Jim I-laggerton Printed Name /Title: Manuel Feliberti, Associate Attest/Authenticated: Approved as to Form: City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty Office of the City Attorney CA revised : 1 -2013 Page 5 81 .k-=. EXHIBITA CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF INTERMODAL FACILITY ACCESS Scope of Services Prepared by: David Evans and Associates, Inc. 415 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005 February 17, 2015 83 TABLE OF CONTENTS TASK 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DELIVERABLES 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Design Criteria 1 1.3 Project Deliverables Furnished by the CONSULTANT 1 1.4 Responsibilities and Services Provided by the CLIENT 1 1.5 Project Assumptions 2 TASK 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL 2 2.1 Project Management 2 2.2 SUBCONSULTANT Coordination 2 2.3 Develop Project Schedule 2 2.4 Monthly Invoices /Progress Reports 3 2.5 Project Kick -off Meeting and Progress Meetings 3 2.6 Quality Control /Quality Assurance Review 3 2.7 Change Management 3 TASK 3.0 SURVEY 4 3.1 Field Review 4 3.2 Data Collection 4 3.3 Utilities As -Built Research 4 3.4 Base Map Preparation 4 TASK 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS (CONCEPTUAL DESIGN) 4 4.1 Project Site Visits (2 Total) 4 4.2 Alternative Conceptual Design 4 4.3 Conceptual Cost Estimates 5 4.4 Preferred Alternative Selection 5 4.5 Alternative Analysis Report 6 TASK 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 6 5.1 Existing Conditions Memorandum 6 5.2 Cultural Resources Alternative Analysis 6 5.3 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum 7 5.4 Hazardous Materials Review 8 5.5 Geology and Soils Review 9 5.6 Existing Hydraulic Review 10 TASK 6.0 STAKEHOLDERS CONCURRENCE 10 6.1 Railroad Coordination 10 6.2 Community Involvement 10 TASK 7.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (IF REQUESTED) 12 S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mlaTukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope_2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila i Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 84 TASK 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, DESIGN CRITERIA, AND DELIVERABLES 1.1 Project Description The City of Tukwila (CLIENT) is requesting professional services from David Evans and Associates, Inc. (CONSULTANT) for an alternative study, conceptual designs and cost estimates, and selection of a preferred alternative for the access to BNSF Intermodal Facility (also known as South Seattle Yard) in the Allentown community of Tukwila. The major features of the project include: • Conceptual Design • Conceptual Cost Estimate for each Alternative • Environmental Desktop Research • Public Outreach • Railroad Coordination • Council Presentation • Preferred Alternative Selection 1.2 Design Criteria The conceptual design will be based on the requirements of the City of Tukwila Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards and AASHTO's "Green Book." 1.3 Project Deliverables Furnished by the CONSULTANT The CONSULTANT shall maintain a project file for pertinent work items. The CLIENT review sets will be returned with each subsequent revision, illustrating that each review comment has been addressed as stated, or how /why it was not addressed. The CONSULTANT shall deliver the following documents and products to the CLIENT as part of this agreement: • Project Schedule and Monthly Updates. • Electronic copy of the existing base map, GIS parcel lines, and data points in AutoCAD. • Roll plot exhibits of alternatives (hard copy roll plot and electronic PDF file). • Preliminary Conceptual Plans (11 "x17" and electronic PDF file). • Screening Matrix. • Preferred Alternative Selection. • Alternative Technical Memorandum. • Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum. • Hazardous Material Memorandum. • Geology and Soils Memorandum. • Arrangements and Presentations for Community Meetings. • Arrangements and Presentations for City Council Briefings. • Arrangements and Meeting with Local Business Owners. • Summary of Stakeholder Interviews. 1.4 Responsibilities and Services Provided by the CLIENT The CLIENT will: • Provide all available existing as -built plans, right -of -way plans, horizontal and vertical monument information, GIS maps, and other mapping information as available to the CONSULTANT. S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIt \TukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 1 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 85 • Review all submittals made to the CLIENT within 15 working days, or as agreed, and return them to the CONSULTANT with consolidated written comments regarding changes or revisions needed. • Provide an electronic copy of the aerial photograph to reference into CAD drawings. • Provide a hydraulic model of the Duwamish River. 1.5 Project Assumptions • All drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD 2012 format, utilizing the CONSULTANT's CADD standards, and drawn at one inch equals forty feet for 11" x 17" plans. Only 11 "x17" plans will be developed for this Scope of Services. • Up to five (5) alternatives will be evaluated. • The project duration is assumed to be nine (9) months. TASK 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL 2.1 Project Management Direction of the CONSULTANT staff and review of their work over the course of the project shall be provided. This work element includes preparing monthly progress reports that include the status of individual work elements, number of meetings attended, outstanding information required, and work items planned for the following month. Monitoring of the CONSULTANT'S design budget will occur over the course of the project. This work element is intended to help monitor costs and budgets, and to propose corrective actions. These actions may include formal requests for increases, modifications, or reductions in scope and /or budget. The CONSULTANT will use an earned value spreadsheet to monitor and track project expenditures by task. The earned value spreadsheet shall be submitted with each invoice and progress report. Drawings and documents received and generated over the course of the project require review, coordination, and file management. The status of requested information will also be maintained. 2.2 SUBCONSULTANT Coordination Direction of the SUBCONSULTANT and review of their work over the course of the project shall be provided by the CONSULTANT. Monthly monitoring of the SUBCONSULTANT's design budget will occur over the course of the project. Current status, as well as projections, will be developed. This work element is intended to help monitor costs and budgets, and to propose corrective actions. These actions could include formal requests for increases, modifications, or reductions in scope and /or budget. The following subconsultants are anticipated to be used on this PROJECT: • GeoEngineers — Hazardous Materials and Geology and Soils Review • Historical Research Associates (HRA) — Cultural /Historical Review • Envirolssues — Community Involvement • Abeyta & Associates — Right -of -Way Costs 2.3 Develop Project Schedule The CONSULTANT and the CLIENT will jointly develop an overall project schedule showing all major and supportive activities. The schedule shall be prepared to reflect a 9 -month Alternative Analysis completion of the project. The schedule shall be arranged to meet key target dates. The CONSULTANT shall update the schedule monthly to reflect the current status of the project. S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIllTukwilalBNSF AccesslTukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 2 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 86 Deliverables: Project Schedule and Monthly Updates. 2.4 Monthly Invoices /Progress Reports Monthly invoices will be prepared by the CONSULTANT per CLIENT requirements for work activities for the prior month. These invoices shall also include SUBCONSULTANT work and will be accompanied by monthly progress reports. Invoices will include back -up material for all expenses and will show approved budget and amount expended to date. Deliverables: Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports (10 total). 2.5 Project Kick -off Meeting and Progress Meetings After receiving notice to proceed from the CLIENT, the CONSULTANT will conduct a project team kick -off meeting with staff expected to be involved in the project and key CLIENT staff. The meeting will be used to discuss key elements of the Scope of Work, the project schedule, document control, and QA /QC procedures; and to clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the project team members. This work element provides for the preparation, attendance, follow -up, and documentation of meetings during the length of the project. These meetings will be the forums for agencies to provide input and guidance for the direction of the project. They will also be used to discuss project issues, approve submittals, and develop potential solutions. The CONSULTANT shall prepare for, attend, and document up to nine (9) meetings with CLIENT staff. Meetings will be required for coordination with the CLIENT and other affected agencies. The CONSULTANT will attend one meeting every month with the CLIENT's project manager for the duration of the project. The meetings will be held in a location acceptable to the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT. Deliverables: Meeting Minutes (10 total). 2.6 Quality Control /Quality Assurance Review This work element is for the QA /QC review of CONSULTANT deliverables by a designated QA /QC staff member of the CONSULTANT team. The review will cover documents, reports, PS &Es, and pertinent information on an on -going basis. The program entails the periodic review of study criteria, design, and assumptions, as well as concepts and presentation of product format, and assures that the overall project objectives are being fulfilled. 2.7 Change Management Project Managers from the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT are responsible for managing changes to the scope and schedule. The CLIENT is responsible for the authorization of any changes to the scope, budget, and /or schedule. Team members must ensure that work within their areas remains within the defined project scope, schedule, and budget. When issues, actions, or circumstances occur that could cause a change in scope, personnel, cost, or schedule, team members must communicate potential changes to the Project Manager as early as possible. Project Managers will determine whether the potential change issue will lead to a change in scope, cost, or schedule. The CONSULTANT shall obtain written authorization from the CLIENT before implementing any change to this Scope of Services, schedule, or budget. All changes shall be documented using the Project Change Form. S:ITRANSIDEAX00301mIATukwila \BNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 3 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 87 TASK 3.0 SURVEY 3.1 Field Review The CONSULTANT and project team will conduct a field review at the outset of the project to identify key field conditions that may impact the conceptual design including the location and /or presence of driveways and roadways, trees, mail boxes, ADA compliance, utilities (underground and overhead), potential intersection site distance and clear zone issues, and drainage issues. 3.2 Data Collection The CONSULTANT shall research CLIENT records to recover the monumentation controlling the site. The CONSULTANT will use Tukwila provided GIS information for existing roadway and right -of -way information. 3.3 Utilities As -Built Research The CONSULTANT shall perform a desktop only research on existing utility information from the CLIENT and respective utility agencies for inclusion in the mapping. Field locates is not included. 3.4 Base Map Preparation The CONSULTANT shall prepare the existing base mapping. The CONSULTANT shall use Tukwila's GIS data as the basis for the base mapping, including GIS parcels lines. The CONSULTANT shall create an existing digital terrain model (DTM) using Tukwila's GIS 2 -foot contours. The CONSULTANT shall preform a topographic survey only in the areas adjacent to the Duwamish River where the 48th Avenue S and Gateway Drive — North Leg alternatives cross the river. This topographic data will be incorporated into the existing base map and DTM. The mapping shall be plotted at a scale of one inch equals forty feet (1 " =40'). Deliverables: Electronic copy of the existing base map, GIS parcel lines, and data points in AutoCAD. TASK 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS (CONCEPTUAL DESIGN) 4.1 Project Site Visits (2 Total) The CONSULTANT shall conduct two (2) site visits during the Alternatives Analysis to become familiar with the site. CLIENT staff shall be present at the site visits, if requested. 4.2 Alternative Conceptual Design The CONSULTANT shall develop the conceptual design for up to five (5) alternatives. The conceptual design will include horizontal and vertical alignments, one typical roadway section, and roadway channelization for each alternative. The CONSULTANT shall include the existing alignment or "Do- Nothing" option. It is assumed that refinements to the alternative will not be performed. The five (5) alternatives will be based upon previous alternative studies performed by the City. These alternatives are as follow: • S 124th Street • Gateway Drive — North Leg • 48th Avenue S S:I TRANS\DEAX00301mIt1TukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 4 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 88 • S 112th Street • Airport Way S It is assumed that Gateway Drive — North Leg and 48th Avenue S will include a new bridge over the Duwamish River. Deliverables: Roll plot exhibits of alternatives (hard copy roll plot and electronic PDF file). Preliminary Conceptual Plans (11 "x17" and electronic PDF file). 4.3 Conceptual Cost Estimates The CONSULTANT shall develop a conceptual construction cost estimate for each alternative. As part of the conceptual construction cost estimates, the CONSULTANT shall the following tasks to determine the preliminary right -of -way costs: • Provide a schedule and financial cost estimates for property acquisitions: o Work will include the review of plans. o Site inspections of each parcel (a total maximum of 40 parcels for all 5 options). o Detailed public property research, land use and zoning information for potentially impacted parcels for each option (a total maximum of 40 parcels for all 5 options). o Evaluation of each parcel's zoning requirements (a total maximum of 40 parcels for all 5 options). o Evaluation of the market value and cost multiplier for each land use classification (a maximum of 5 land use classifications). o Identification of acquisition impacts and assessments for each parcel (a total maximum of 40 parcels for all 5 options). o Identification of relocation impacts and assessments for each parcel (a total maximum of 40 parcels for all 5 options). • Prepare a report identifying potential property acquisition impacts (including relocation activities) for each option (a total maximum of 40 parcels for all 5 options): o The report at a minimum will include a list of potential property acquisitions /easements and rights of entry, zoning requirements and potential cost. o Prepare a draft conceptual cost estimate (hard copy and electronic PDF file). o Prepare a final conceptual cost estimate (hard copy and electronic PDF file). Conduct preliminary site visits (Up to 40 parcels). Appraisals of parcels are not included. Deliverables: Potential Property Acquisition Impacts (hard copy and electronic PDF file). Draft Conceptual Cost Estimate (hard copy and electronic PDF file). Final Conceptual Cost Estimate (hard copy and electronic PDF file). 4.4 Preferred Alternative Selection The CONSULTANT shall prepare a screening matrix for the selection of the preferred alternative. The screening matrix shall be developed by the CONSULTANT based on criteria developed by the CITY, BNSF, and the CONSULTANT. Deliverables: Draft Screening Matrix. Final Screening Matrix. Preferred Alternative Selection. S: ITRANSIDEAX00301m11 1Tukwila\BNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope_2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 5 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 89 4.5 Alternative Analysis Report In supporting the SEPA process, an Alternatives Analysis Report shall be prepared for this project by the CONSULTANT and shall include developing alternatives for roadway alignment and typical roadway sections with support information from the Environmental Research task. The Alternative Analysis Report shall include the following elements: • Cover. • Executive Summary. • Introduction. • Project Background. • A summary of the design criteria to be used for the proposed improvements. • An evaluation of up to five (5) alternatives and the Do- Nothing scenario for roadway alignment and typical roadway sections to be screened. • A summary of the desktop research performed for critical areas, cultural /historical, hazardous materials, geology and soils, and hydraulic that could potentially impact each alternative. • Conceptual cost estimates for each proposed alternative including construction and right -of -way acquisitions costs. • Identification of project limits and types of right -of -way acquisitions needed for each alternative. • Conceptual plan sheets and typical roadway sections for each alternative. Deliverables: Draft Alternative Technical Memorandum. Final Alternative Technical Memorandum. TASK 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 5.1 Existing Conditions Memorandum The CONSULTANT shall prepare an Existing Conditions Memorandum to identify key discriminators and environmental constraints for the top design alternatives. A desktop review will be conducted to review critical areas maps and GIS data from the City, County, and various state agencies. A site visit will be performed to identify potential missing information from the desktop review. The Existing Conditions Memorandum shall identify potential environmental constraints within the project area, possible mitigation strategies, and permitting implications associated with the top design alternatives. One site visit will be performed to review all of the alternatives. Deliverables: Draft Existing Conditions Memorandum (3 copies and electronic PDF). 5.2 Cultural Resources Alternative Analysis The CONSULTANT shall analyze the potential impacts of five alternatives on previously recorded cultural resources (archaeological sites; eligible or listed historic register properties; and buildings, structures, and objects [BSOs] 35 years old or older that may be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places [NRHP], Washington Heritage Register [WHR], or King County Landmarks Register [Tukwila has an interlocal agreement for historic preservation with King County). (Note: HRA proposed to evaluate buildings, structures, and objects 35 years old or older to account for King County Landmark's 40 -year age criteria minus 5 years to account for the potential length of the project.) Additionally, the CONSULTANT shall analyze the archaeological sensitivity of each of the alternatives in order to establish the likelihood of these alternatives encountering cultural resources during S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIt1TukwilalBNSF AccesslTukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 6 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 90 construction. The report will make recommendations regarding cultural resource studies that should take place, including suggested methods of inquiry, prior to the selection and design of a final alignment. 5.2.1 Background Research Background research will be performed to inform recommendations regarding the need for future cultural resources studies (e.g., recommended methods of inquiry) and the potential for encountering archaeological resources of varying time periods and historic - period architectural resources (35 years old or older) along each of the proposed alternative alignments. Geoarchaeology The CONSULTANT shall review available and pertinent geologic datasets in the vicinity and within the project alternatives in order to evaluate the Project's potential for encountering sediments that could contain archaeological resources. These datasets are anticipated to include nearby geotechnical bore logs, geologic maps, and soil survey data, among other sources of information. This subtask will also include identification of areas that have been subject to previous disturbance as a result of development activities and areas where deep fill exists. The depth of the documented disturbance and fill will be documented where possible. This information will be used to inform recommendations and the likelihood of encountering buried cultural materials along each of the proposed alternatives. Archaeology The CONSULTANT shall perform background research using the Washington Information System for Archaeological and Architectural Resources Data (WISAARD), ethnographic sources, available historic maps, and other sources in the Seattle Office library and local repositories that may have bearing on the potential for archaeological resources to be located within each of the proposed alternative alignments. Locations of previous archaeological surveys (and the methods employed), archaeological sites, ethnographic sites, cemeteries, and historic - period features will be important for further evaluating the proposed alternatives and refining recommendations for cultural resources investigation. Buildings, Structures, and Objects The CONSULTANT shall perform background research using WISAARD and the King County assessor's website to identify BSOs that are 40 years old or older within or immediately adjacent to each of the proposed alternatives. The NRHP status of previously recorded buildings will be recorded, and recommendations will be made regarding the alternative that is least likely to impact historic BSOs. 5.3 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum summarizing the results of the archival research, and presenting recommendations for further cultural resources inquiry. This memorandum will reflect professional standards for format and content as expressed in the guidelines prepared by the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). The memorandum may include: • A summary of the results of the background literature and records research. • A summary of geologic conditions and landscape modification. • A description of cultural resources and archaeological surveys /projects located along each of the proposed alternatives. • A summary discussion of the archaeological sensitivity of and potential for each of the proposed alignments to encounter archaeological resources or have an effect on a traditional cultural property. S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIATukwila1BNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 7 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 91 • A summary discussion of the presence of aboveground historic resources that are either eligible for or listed in the federal, state, or local registers or that need evaluation due to their age and recommendations about which alignment might have more of an impact on known or potentially historic buildings and structures. • Recommendations regarding future actions for addressing concerns along each of the proposed alternatives. • References cited. The report will include such tables, maps, photographs, and other graphics as are needed to depict the scope of the study and results. If revisions to the Draft Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum are required, additional budget will be negotiated. Deliverables: Draft Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum (3 hard copies and electronic PDF). 5.4 Hazardous Materials Review The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Memorandum for the project. By identifying and assessing the potential for encountering environmental contaminants in soil and water during the alternative evaluation, the memorandum shall contribute to the overall evaluation of hazardous materials on construction activities, human health, and the environment. The memorandum shall also provide information needed to determine whether additional hazardous material investigations (such as initial site assessments or preliminary site investigations) should be conducted. Site Screening Review /Regulatory Database Study The CONSULTANT shall review the results of a federal, state, local, and tribal environmental database search (Environmental Database Resources [EDR] Report) for listings of sites with known or suspected environmental conditions on or near each alternative site within the search distances specified by ASTM International (ASTM) Standard E 1527 -05. Field Reconnaissance /Windshield Survey The CONSULTANT shall conduct a drive -by reconnaissance of the project boundary at each alternative site. The windshield survey will focus on sites with known or suspected environmental concerns that could potentially affect acquisition or construction decisions. All properties being considered for right - of -way (ROW) acquisition will be included in this effort as applicable. The windshield survey will be limited to features readily observed from public access corridors and we will not be entering or viewing conditions within buildings. Information regarding the sites will be recorded in field notes and photographs. File Review /Aerial Photograph Review /Data Validation The overall project footprint for each alternative site will include properties, as identified in field reconnaissance, both within and outside of the proposed ROW that may have a potential to affect acquisition decisions and construction activities due to the possible or known presence of contaminants. Suspect properties will be identified during the field reconnaissance and this task activity. Pertinent files for these suspect sites will be reviewed to identify the nature and extent of any known contamination, completed remedial activities, and the effect these sites may have on environmental conditions within the project corridor. This task will be accomplished by performing the following activities: • Review of publicly available records from the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) via regular mail or electronic mail. • Review of available aerial photographs to evaluate the history of the project site. S: ITRANSIDEAX00301m1ATukwilalBNSF AccesslTukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 8 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 92 • Review of available geologic literature and topographic maps to determine surface drainage paths as well as groundwater depth and flow direction below the project footprint. • Review of historical tax assessor records from the King County website. • Screening of the suspect properties based on their location relative to prospective ROW construction areas as well as on additional site - specific environmental data available in regulatory agency files. This screening process will identify conditions that represent the potential to significantly affect the ROW acquisition area, including design, acquisition, or construction. Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandum The CONSULTANT shall prepare a technical memorandum for the linear study. The memorandum will include a summary of the results for each alternative site regarding the potential for contamination by hazardous substances. Each property of concern within each alternative site will be identified in the memora ndum. If revisions to the Draft Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandum are required, additional budget will be negotiated to complete this task. Deliverables: Draft Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandum (3 hard copies and electronic PDF). 5.5 Geology and Soils Review The CONSULTANT shall perform the following geotechnical services: • Develop a preliminary understanding of geologic conditions at the five proposed alignments by reviewing information provided, readily available published geologic data, and in -house files. • Conduct a site visit and visual reconnaissance of the five alternatives. • Discuss preliminary findings with the City. • Identify geotechnical conditions along each alignment. The CONSULTANT shall include their preliminary opinion regarding possible design and construction issues related to geology and soil and groundwater conditions based on their findings, reconnaissance, and discussions. Discussion topics may address the following: • Steep slopes • General earthwork planning • Settlement of fills and structures • Foundation bearing support and subgrade preparation • Liquefaction • Ground improvement • Temporary shoring Geology and Soils Technical Memorandum The CONSULTANT shall prepare a technical memorandum presenting a summary of our review, reconnaissance, and preliminary conclusions and recommendations. The memorandum will include a section designated to each alternative. If revisions to the Draft Geology and Soils Technical Memorandum are required, additional budget will be negotiated. S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIfTukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 9 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 93 Deliverables: Draft Geology and Soils Technical Memorandum (3 hard copies and electronic PDF). 5.6 Existing Hydraulic Review The CONSULTANT shall review the existing Duwamish River hydraulic model data and maps in order to determine the 100 -year water surface elevation. Field investigation or hydraulic modeling is not included for this phase of the project. TASK 6.0 STAKEHOLDERS CONCURRENCE 6.1 Railroad Coordination The CONSULTANT shall meet monthly with BNSF railroad to understand BNSF project goals, discuss BNSF concerns, provide project updates, and address BNSF comments. It is assumed up to 4 meetings will be held and will be attended by two consultant staff. Deliverables: Meeting Minutes (4 total). 6.2 Community Involvement Neighborhood Outreach The CONSULTANT will develop and implement a community outreach process to ensure that adjacent or affected neighborhoods are aware of the project, understand the alternatives being considered, are given opportunities to provide feedback about the project, and are informed of project milestones and outcomes. The community engagement process will include: • Public Involvement Plan (PIP): The PIP will include public engagement strategies, activities, materials, target audiences, and other communications products. ■ Presentations to Neighborhood Councils or Other Targeted Community Groups (up to three): The Allentown and Foster Point neighborhoods would be a primary focus of this effort, given their proximity to the intermodal facility. • Community Open House: Community members will be invited to hear from project leaders about the alternatives under consideration and the factors that will contribute to the eventual choice. The Open House will serve as an opportunity to collect input from the community related to proposed design elements of the project. • Project Fact Sheet: The CONSULTANT will develop a project fact sheet to ensure project information shared with the public is consistent, and easily and readily accessible. • Email Updates to the Community at Appropriate Project Milestones (up to four): The CONSULTANT will provide project information to the community via email so that community members are provided with current, accurate information as the project progresses. These email updates will also be provided to City Council members, community leaders, and business owners interested in or affected by the project. ■ Project Website and Social Media: The CONSULTANT will work with City staff to post information about the project online on the City's website and associated social media sites (e.g. Facebook, Twitter). Website and social media content will be developed by the CONSULTANT at appropriate project milestones (up to four times). S: ITRANSIDEAX00301m1ATukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 10 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 94 Assumptions: • The CONSULTANT will coordinate venues and logistics; prepare agendas and /or talking points; distribute notifications; develop materials; and staff, facilitate, and summarize the neighborhood council and /or targeted community group meetings. • The CONSULTANT will coordinate venue and logistics; prepare an agenda; distribute the notification; develop materials; and staff, facilitate, and summarize the Community Open House. The CLIENT will notify the appropriate City staff of the meeting and request their presence. • The CLIENT will distribute email updates to the community using content and a distribution list provided by the CONSULTANT. • The CLIENT will host, maintain, and update content on the project website. • The CLIENT will maintain and update project social media sites, post content, and connect with social media of other departments, initiatives, and other stakeholders. • The CONSULTANT will coordinate and pay for printing of all project - related materials, including but not limited to, fact sheets, display boards, and flyers. Deliverables: One (1) Public Involvement Plan (initial draft, final draft, and up to three updates as needed). Meeting notifications and summaries for up to three (3) community /neighborhood presentations. Meeting notification, meeting materials, and summary for one (1) Community Open House. One (1) PowerPoint or similar presentation tool for community meetings and open house (one final, and up to four updates as needed). One (1) project fact sheet (one final, and up to two updates as needed). One (1) email distribution list (to be maintained and updated over the life of the project). Up to four (4) email updates to community members and key stakeholders. Up to four (4) proposed website and social media updates. Elected Officials Outreach The CLIENT and CONSULTANT shall engage elected, local government agency and identified community leaders in the alternative project areas, keeping them apprised of progress, and shall solicit feedback on the priorities for their particular agencies or for the community. The engagement process will include: ■ Individual or small group meetings (up to eight (8)): Project leaders will meet with City Council members or identified community leaders either individually or in a small, informal group setting to hear in greater detail the needs, concerns, and priorities for their particular communities, and determine which components will be crucial in gaining their approval of the eventual selected alternative. ■ PowerPoint presentations for City Council (up to three (3)): Briefings to the Tukwila City Council will be provided by the CLIENT at appropriate project milestones, keeping them apprised of community feedback received. The CONSULTANT will develop PowerPoint presentations describing key project milestones and current project status in preparation for up to three City Council briefings. Deliverables: Summaries for up to eight (8) individual or small group meetings. One (1) PowerPoint or similar presentation tool for up to three (3) City Council briefings (one final, and up to three updates as needed). S: ITRANSIDEAX0030ImIATukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope 2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 11 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 95 Business Outreach The CONSULTANT, with support from the CLIENT, shall engage business owners from the Gateway Business Park and other adjacent businesses near the project area to keep them apprised of progress, and to solicit feedback on how the proposed alternatives would affect their business operations. The engagement process will include: • Individual or small group meetings and /or stakeholder interviews conducted via phone (up to twelve (12)): Project leaders will meet with business owners or operators either in person or via phone to hear in greater detail the needs, concerns, and priorities for their particular communities, and to determine which components will be crucial in gaining their approval of the eventual selected alternative. • Provide ongoing updates via email: As noted under the first item, email updates will be provided at appropriate project milestones (up to four (4)). Assumptions: • The CONSULTANT will schedule, coordinate logistics, prepare agendas and /or talking points, develop materials, staff, facilitate, and summarize individual or small group meetings and /or stakeholder interviews. Deliverables: Develop list of questions for business owners regarding business operations and concerns related to the BNSF Intermodal Facility. Arrange logistics for staff meetings and /or phone interviews (number to be determined). Summaries for up to twelve (12) small group meetings and /or stakeholder interviews. TASK 7.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (IF REQUESTED) S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIfTukwila1BNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Scope_2015- 0217.docx City of Tukwila 12 Scope of Services BNSF Intermodal Facility Access February 17, 2015 96 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access David Evans and Associates, Inc. riascifhrarinn Principal In Charge (PICH) Project Manager (MGPE) QA/QC Manager (MGPE) Rail Engineer IV (RAL4) Railroad Engineer (SPJM) Professional Engineer (PEEN) Sr. CADD Technician (SCAD) CADD Technician (CADD) Sr. Bridge Engineer Sr. Scientist (SSCI) Water Resources Engineer (WREN) Senior Graphic Specialist (SGRP) Survey Manager (SVYM) Professional Land Surveyor (PLSU) Survey Technician (SVTE) Party Chief (PCHF) Instructrnent Person (INST) Administrative Assistant (ADMA) Project Administrator (PADM) Negotiated Hrs. x Rate = Cost 5 $ 254.29 $1,271 357 $ 192.60 $68,759 54 $ 192.60 $10,400 40 $ 234.04 $9,362 20 $ 195.61 $3,912 278 $ 136.93 $38,066 104 $ 112.85 $11,737 8 $ 81.25 $650 50 $ 165.52 $8,276 92 $ 124.29 $11,435 9 $ 140.54 $1,265 28 $ 102.32 $2,865 2 $ 183.57 $367 11 $ 109.84 $1,208 28 $ 90.28 $2,528 16 $ 105.33 $1,685 16 $ 66.21 $1,059 63 $ 86.97 $5,479 14 $ 99.61 $1,395 Total Hrs. 1195 Salary Cost Salary Escalation Cost (estimated) Escalation - % of Labor Cost Total Salary Cost 0% per year 0 year(s) $ 181,719 $0 181,719 Direct Expenses Reproduction Costs Reports Mail /Deliveries /Fed Ex Mileage Subtotal No. Unit Each Cost 5 12 930 David Evans and Associates Total Subconsultants reports @ $15 /report $ 75.00 cx $35 $ 420.00 miles @ $0.575 /mile $ 534.75 1,030 $ 182,749 Hrs $ Total 1 Abeyta Associates 121 $ 14,455 2 ; Envirolssues 443 $ 51,311 3 GeoEngineers 275 $ 35,606 4 Historical Research Associates 172 $ 15,878 1,011 Subconsultant Total Direct Expenses Sub -Total (including SubconsuItantsl 117,249 $ 118,279 Total Costs $ 299,999 Page 1 of 12 S:l TRANSIDEAx00301mIflTukwila \BNSF Access \Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Budget Estimate_2015- 0217.xls Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM 97 98 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access David Evans and Associates, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 O H m CM $7,7041 $4,6221 $3,3571 $5,1071 $8,2131 U $1,0261 $1,1531 iot) LC) $8,055. $2,7841 v o rn CD $3,7341 $2,3121 o v $8,3161 1 0 a) N. < To i L O In N N CO 00 O 6) (0 M( N V N N CO V co M M co N CO CO � d' N M O N in (Wayd) Joleals!u!wpy }oefoid Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs o ,- (vWay) luels!ssy angeals!u!wpy co co o (1SNI) uosiad luawlonulsu! CO (dHed) le!4e Al1ed `r (31AS) ue!o!ugoal )(ening v N (f1Sld) Joi(anunS puel !euo!ssa;oad N CO (W,(/(S) J96eueW Awung N fO v rn (dZIJS) ls!!e!oadS o!ydeJO ao!ues N (N32iM) ieeu!6u3 sa0Jnosab JeleM (IoSS) ls!lue!oS .-IS co aaau!6u3 e6pu8 .JS N v N ° (aavo) ue!o!uyoal aavo 00 00 (av s) ue!a!uuaal (MVO .as O c O oo co N (N3dd) Jaeu!6u3 !euo!sseJoad N N N 0p ° v 0 v 0 N O v CO (WPBS) aaau!6u3 peai!!e co LO co (171bi) Al Jeeu!6u3 !!eel c) oo 0 (Aden) a06eueW 00/t10 00 N N (Aden) aa6eueW laafad N N° N c0 L.0 N v CO N r CO N (Ha!d) °6le4e u! !ed!auud M N Work Element Project Management and Quality Control Project Management (2 hrs /week for 10 mo) Subconsultant Coordination Develop Project Schedule Monthly Invoices /Progress Reports (10 Total) Project Kick -off Meeting and Progress Meetings (up to 10) Quality Control /Quality Assurance Review Change Management '. orI Element 2.0 Total a) 3 N Field Review Data Collection Utilities As -Built Research Base Map Preparation Work Element 3.0 Total Alternative Analysis (Conceptual Design) Project Site Visits (2 total) Alternative Conceptual Design Conceptual Cost Estimates Draft Conceptual Cost Estimate Final Conceptual Cost Estimate Preferred Alternative Selection Draft Screening Matrix Final Screening Matrix Alternative Analysis Report (Draft and Final) Draft Alternative Technical Memo Final Alternative Technical Memo J Work Element 4.0 Total c m 0) 111 * s o p vz 1 N N M N N to N CO N LZ I a ei r- M N M M r) o') a yr N 4 M 4 M V 4.3.2 1 4.4.1 4.4.2 M) t V N to 4 99 Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM S: \TRANS \DEAX0030 \mlfTukwila \BNSF Access \Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Budget Estimate_2015- 0217.xls David Evans and Associates, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Q R w o u9 Q 1- 00 0) to_ 0) 0 Lo 0) 0 to 0) 0 so IC) 0) $5,4411 10 CO ea $2,5401 O N- r- 0 N- Ca CO Cr) EA $3851 $3,8521 r- O 0 M EA CO O) En $4,6221 0 co O v? 0) Tr h N ao CA Q R Q H L CO M M CO T M N CO 7 r - N CO O O ,- N 10 (Wand) ao ;ea;s!u!wpy pefoad Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs 5 357 54 40 20 278 104 8 50 92 9 28 2 11 28 16 16 63 14 (vnav) 1ue;s!ssy engea1s!u!wpy co °) co (1SNI) uosaad }uawTona }sub (dHed) ONO APed (aLAs) ue!o!uyoal Ao,ung (nsid) aoAanan9 puei leuo!ssa;oad if requested if requested if requested (iAjAAs) aa6euew (ananS (dbos) Is!!e!oadS o!ydeio ao!ues co to the contract to the contract to the contract m (N3NM) Jeeu!6u3 saoanosab aa}e/N Lo (IaSS) 3s!1ue!oS 'aS co as a supplement as a supplement aaau!6u3 e6pu8 •as as a sup (aavo) ue!o!uyoal aavo be negotiated Will be negotiated be negotiated d' (alas) ue!o!utloel aavo 'as .4 (N3dd) aaau!6u3 leuo!sse oad 3 3 v (nfds) Jeau!6u3 peoal!ej ,- 0 (171VH) Al aaeu!6u3 l!e i (Aden) aa6euew ab /Vt 1 (Aden) aa6euew loafoad N N N N ,- N CO V N N N (Hald) e6ae4e ul led!ouud Work Element Environmental Research Existing Conditions Memorandum (Draft) Cultural Resources Alternative Analysis Cultural Resources Technical Memo Draft Cultural Resources Tech Memo Final Cultural Resources Tech Memo Hazardous Materials Review Draft Hazardous Materials Memo Final Hazardous Materials Memo Geology and Soils Review Draft Geology and Soils Memo Final Geology and Soils Memo Existing Hydraulic Review 1.1Nork Element 5.0 Total Stakeholders Concurrence Railroad Coordination Meetings (4 Total) Community Involvement Neighborhood Outreach a E c R 0 w E a) 0 c U_ 4 a Community Presentations (up to 3) Community Open House PowerPoint for Community Mtgs & Open House Project Fact Sheet Email Distribution List Email Updates for Community Members (up to 4) l Website Content and Social Media Updates (up to 4) Elected Officials Outreach Individual /Small Group Briefings (up to 8) City Council Briefings (up to 3) PowerPoint for City Council Briefings (up to 3) Business Outreach List of Questions for Business Owners Small Group Meetings and /or Stakeholder InterviewsMeetings (up to 12) Work Element 6.0 Totall Preliminary Design of Preferred Alternative (if requested) 1 EXPENSES PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS c d E d w Y p c 4Y � 6 N u') M In tq lC) CO In p CO CO N EO 0'LI r-1:1 101 Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM S: \TRANS \DEAX0030 \mlfTukwila \BNSF Access \Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Budget Estimate_2015- 0217.xls 02 1 2 3 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Abeyta Associates Classification SR/WA ROW Technician Admin Negotiated Hrs. x Rate = Cost 84 $ 125.35 $10,529 22 $ 114.45 $2,518 15 $ 81.75 $1,226 Total Hrs. 121 Salary Cost $ 14,274 Salary Escalation Cost (estimated) Escalation - % of Labor Cost 0% per year @ 0 year(s) _ $0 Total Salary Cost $ 14,274 Direct Expenses Reproduction Costs Copies Reports Plans Appraisal Consultant Mail /Deliveries /Fed Ex Mileage Subtotal Abeyta Associates Total No. 55 4 0 0 15 218 Unit Each pages reports @ sets miles @ $0.15 $10 $5,500 $0.48 $0.575 Cost /page $ 8.25 /report $ 40.00 /set $ - $ - $ 7.20 /mile $ 125.35 $ 181 $ 14,455 Page 4 of 12 S:( TRANSIDEAX04301m1f\TukwilalBNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF fntermodal Access Budget Eslmate_2015- 0217.xls Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM 103 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Abeyta Associates 1 2 3 a $10,8561 $3,4171 d' � N r EA- r CO r ,4-,>, rts N QL t Q N 6� N r r r uivapy TO fi) ~ _c -6 co ~ o Lo 84 22 15 uei3iugoel M02J N N V /VVH S co 24 11 co Work Element Alternative Analysis (Conceptual Design) Project Site Visits (2 total) Alternative Conceptual Design Conceptual Cost Estimates Draft Conceptual Cost Estimate Final Conceptual Cost Estimate Work Element 4.0 Total EXPENSES PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS Y L C y W O 4 r d N 4 M 4 r C6 4 N M 4 104 Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM S: \TRANS \DEAX0030 \mlf\Tukwila \BNSF Access \Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Budget Estimate_2015- 0217.xls City of Tukwila BNSF lntermodal Facility Access Envirolssues Negotiated Classification Hrs. x Rate - Cost 1 Project Coordinator 124 $ 67.33 $8,350 2 Associate I i 221 $ 122.96 $27,174 3 Senior Associate (Cherie) 72 $ 172.73 512,436 4 Graphics 26 $ 73.19 $1,903 Total Hrs. 443 Salary Cost $ 49,863 Salary Escalation Cost (estimated) Escalation - % of Labor Cost 0% per year @ 0 year(s) 50 Total Salary Cost $ 49,863 Direct Expenses Reproduction Costs Copies Reports Plans Parking Mail /Deliveries /Fed Ex Mileage No. Unit Each Cost 1000 0 0 10 0 884 pages @ 50.89 /page $ 890.00 reports @ /report $ - sets @ 5100 /set $ $5 $ 50.00 $ miles @ 50.575 /mile $ 508.30 Subtotal $ 1,448 Envirolssues Total Page 6 of 12 S: ITRANSIDEAx00301mIflTukwilaIBNSF AccesslTukwila - BNSF Internrodal Access Budget Eslimate_2015- 0217.xls Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM 105 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Envirolssues 1 2 3 4 > m Z p te W $1,4781 M Lii Ea f-- ai El Z O ` W i_ s - V In saiydeae Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs (elaeyo) aleiaosse aoivag 00 11 e1eiaossy in M Jo}euipaoo3 }aafoad Work Element 0 0 Project Management and Quality Control Project Management (2 hrs /week for 10 mo) Subconsultant Coordination Develop Project Schedule Monthly Invoices /Progress Reports (10 Total) Project Kick -off Meeting and Progress Meetings (up to 10) Quality Control /Quality Assurance Review Change Management Work Element 2.0 Total ..+ C O d d il 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 N- N 106 Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM Envirolssues 1 2 3 4 Z _ W LC) O CO CO $5,8491 $7,5181 $1,7331 CO U) $1,5221 CO CO EA CO h ER $7,0321 $1,7741 CO W O CH $8,3381 CO CO 0 Tr CO V V K3 z W • co V O (O V CO CO N M CO CO In N CO 1— M 443 S3!gdeJs Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs OO ? co 124 221 72 26 (eiieyo) a ;e!30SSV _lopes LO l- C- CV CV CO N CD 11 ateIOOSSf/ O N M 00 W M CO (O CO JOIPUIpJ003 }oa(OJd °P CO CO CO CO CO N ° 'I" Work Element Stakeholders Concurrence Railroad Coordination Meetings (4 Total) Community Involvement Neighborhood Outreach Public Involvement Plan (PIP) Community Presentations (up to 3) Community Open House PowerPoint for Community Mtgs & Open House Project Fact Sheet Email Distribution List Email Updates for Community Members (up to 4) Website Content and Social Media Updates (up to 4) Elected Officials Outreach Individual /Small Group Briefings (up to 8) City Council Briefings (up to 3) PowerPoint for City Council Briefings (up to 3) Business Outreach List of Questions for Business Owners Small Group Meetings and /or Stakeholder InterviewsMeetings (up to 12) Work Element 6.0 Total EXPENSES PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS 6.0 CO N Cfl Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM N_ O w a � r N as a° 0 N E N W O O) m y N 4) 0 0 c0 0 O E a) C z m (0 N U U LL Cn LT, .3 Y E O co O 107 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access GeoEngineers Classification Principal Associate Senior Engineer /Scientist/Analyst 2 Senior Engineer /Scientist/Analyst 1 Project Engineer /Scientist/Analyst 2 Project Engineer /Scientist/Analyst 1 Staff 3 Engineer /ScientistlAnalyst Staff 2 Engineer /Scientist/Analyst Staff 1 Engineer /Scientist/Analyst CAD Designer Senior Technician Administrator Support Negotiated Hrs. x Rate = Cost 0 $ 220.44 $0 15 $ 209.92 $3,149 0 $ 165.99 $0 46 $ 147.71 $6,795 50 $ 126.98 $6,349 0 $ 115.23 $0 127 $ 109.07 $13,852 0 $ 95.13 $0 0 $ 86.67 $0 10 $ 108.31 $1,083 0 $ 83.21 $0 27 $ 80.38 $2,170 Total Hrs. 275 Salary Cost $ 33,398 Salary Escalation Cost (estimated) Escalation - % of Labor Cost 0% per year @ 0 year(s) $0 Total Salary Cost $ 33,398 Direct Expenses Reproduction Costs Copies Reports Plans EDR /Database Mail /Deliveries /Fed Ex Mileage Subtotal GeoEngineers Total No. Unit Each Cost 500 12 0 5 4 300 pages @ $0.15 /page $ 75.00 reports @ $30 /report $ 360.00 sets @ /set $ search@ $300 /search $ 1,500.00 package@ $25 /package $ 100.00 miles @ $0.575 /mile $ 172.50 Page 9 of 12 S: ITRANSIDEAX00301mIITukwilalONSF AccesslTukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Budget Eslimate_2015 -0217. is 108 $ 2,208 $ 35,606 Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access GeoEngineers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 W v> 0 I- 1 $18,9171 0$ v e» $33,398 $2,2081 0 0 1.0- 0 LIJ m i 0 F t CO N- n N- 1- N 275 poddnS Jo}ea}siuiwpy Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs Will be negotiated as a supplement to the contract if requested Will be negotiated as a supplement to the contract if requested N 15 46 50 127 10 27 ueiaiuyooj aoiues 0 aau6isa0 Qyo 0 lslieuy /lsgua!OS /aaaui6u3 L llelS 0 N PM lsAleuy /lsiluai3S /Jaa4u3 Z IlelS 1sAieuy/}si;ue!os /Jaau!6u3 E 14eTS ,n r` N (0 L ;s/(Ieuy/1si;ue!os/Jaaui6u3 loafad Z )sAIeuy/}siluaiog/Jaaui6u3 loefad 0 (0 L lsAIeuy/lsiluaios/aaaui6u3 Joiues 0 v 0 v Z lsAieuy/}siluepspeaui6u3 copes eleioossy ° in Iediouud Work Element Environmental Research Hazardous Materials Review Draft Hazardous Materials Memo Final Hazardous Materials Memo Geology and Soils Review Draft Geology and Soils Memo Final Geology and Soils Memo Work Element 5.0 Total EXPENSES PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS •. C O a, N W G N L() l!') Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM 0 m aN N 9 0 N E .y W N m V J m N 0 U U To O E 4) LL N Z 00 c6 J F- N N U U U- N Z CO m J E 00 0 x0 W 109 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Historical Research Associates Classification Sr Archaeologist Sr Historian Project Archaeologist Architectural Historian Research Archaeologist/GIS Geoarchaeologist Editor Production Specialist Office Manager /Clerical Project Administrator Computer Support Negotiated Hrs. x Rate = 8 6 48 38 12 48 4 2 2 2 2 $ 118.00 $ 110.00 $ 89.00 $ 86.00 $ 76.00 $ 96.00 $ 75.00 $ 91.00 $ 56.00 $ 80.00 $ 107.00 Cost $944 $660 $4,272 $3,268 $912 $4,608 $300 $182 $112 $160 $214 Total Hrs. 172 Salary Cost 15,632 Salary Escalation Cost (estimated) Escalation - % of Labor Cost 0% per year @ 0 year(s) $0 Total Salary Cost $ 15,632 Direct Expenses Reproduction Costs Copies Reports Plans Parking Mail /Deliveries /Fed Ex Mileage No. 1200 0 0 1 2 80 Unit Each pages @ reports @ sets @ miles $0.10 $40 $20 $0.575 Cost /page $ 120.00 /report $ /set $ - $ 40.00 $ 40.00 /mile $ 46.00 Subtotal $ 246 Historical Research Associates Total Page 11 of 12 S: ITRANSIDF _AX0039VnIf\TukwilaeNSF Access\Tukwila - BNSF Intermodal Access Budget Estimate_2015 -0217, is 110 $ 15,878 Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Historical Research Associates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 H $6,5261 0 v N V3 $15,878 w' " I H L N 0 iaoddns ie ndwoo Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs N Will be negotiated as a supplement to the contract if requested 8 6 48 38 12 48 4 2 2 2 2 Jojaajs!uiwpy 1aafoJd N N N N -4 C° A- co leopeope6eueW eo!jp N IsIIeiaads uoi ;anpoad N a01.1p3 v }si6opaeyoieoae N N sionsOoloaeyaay yaeasad CO CO ueuo1s!H lean ;oa}iyoad co c°o 1si6oIoaeyaiv laafoad N ue.Jojs!H N JS N v 1si6oloaeyaiv as N CO 00 Work Element Environmental Research Cultural Resources Alternative Analysis Cultural Resources Technical Memo Draft Cultural Resources Tech Memo Final Cultural Resources Tech Memo Work Element 5.0 Total EXPENSES PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS 4 O N NN 11J G N Ln M L(i Printed: 2/17/2015, 4:36 PM N O N � X r N a9 N 0 N E N W N O a 7 N N U) 0 0 (6 a 0 E d LL z m m J y U) U V LL N Z m E O M O xO Q W Z I 111