HomeMy WebLinkAboutFS 2015-03-17 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Finance and Safety
Committee
O Kathy Hougardy, Chair
O Joe Duffie
O De'Sean Quinn
AGENDA
Distribution:
Recommended Action
K. Hougardy
P. McCarthy
J. Duffie
C. C'Flaherty
D. Quinn
R. Turpin
K. Kruller
L. Humphrey
D. Robertson
C. Flores
Mayor Haggerton
M. Villa
D. Cline
Chris Flores, Interim Fire Chief
TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 2015 — 5:30 PM
HAZELNUT CONFERENCE ROOM
(formerly known as CR #3) at east entrance of City Hall
Item
Recommended Action
Page
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Purchase of 12 thermal imaging cameras for the
a. Forward to 3/23 Consent
Pg.i
Fire Department.
Agenda.
Chris Flores, Interim Fire Chief
b. 2014 4th Quarter Investment Report.
b. Information only.
Pg. 15
Peggy McCarthy, Finance Director
c. 2014 4th Quarter Police Department Report.
c. Information only.
Pg.27
Mike Vi/ /a, Po /ice Chief
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
4. MISCELLANEOUS
Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, Apr#7, 2015
SThe City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206 - 433 -1800 ( TukwilaCityClerk (a)TukwilaWA.gov) for assistance.
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggertan, Mayor
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Finance and Safety Committee
FROM: Chris Flores, Interim Fire Chief
DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBJECT: FD Purchase of Thermal Imaging Cameras
I] kyl
ISSUE
The department administration is asking Tukwila City Council to approve the purchase of
replacement thermal imaging cameras (TIC's).
BACKGROUND
All department thermal imaging cameras are scheduled to be replaced in 2015. The expenditure
was included in the 2015-2016 departmental biennial budget request, and approved by Tukwila
City Council. Funding can be found in Account Number 000 11 522 200 35 00, on page 195 of
the City 2015-2016 Biennial Budget. These units replace existing inventory, whose service lives
span technological changes over three plus decades. A team was assigned to research and
make recommendation regarding the unit to be purchased. The chosen unit not only tied for the
highest assessment score, but is available at the most competitive pricing.
DISCUSSION
The City/Department can take advantage of discounted pricing and equipment bonuses by
ordering and purchasing this equipment prior to the expiration of the attached existing current
quote.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The financial impact is $55,642.43. The amount budgeted for this expenditure is $72,000.00.
The funding source is City/Department General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the proposal and consider this item at the March 23,
2015 Special Meeting Consent Agenda.
ATTACHMENTS
Current Quote
Research Document
Unifire, Inc.
3924 E. Trent Ave.
Spokane, WA 99202
Quote To
Joel Perry
Tukwila Fire Dist. #54
4237 S. 144 St.
Tukwila, WA 98168
206 -849 -1298
Toll -Free: 1 -800- 745 -3282
Phone: 971 -269 -4226
Fax: 509 - 535 -9064
www.unifireusa.com
Quote
Date
Quote #
2/23/2015
10065BJS
Quote By: Jerry Springer
Item
Description
Qty
MSP
Your Cost Ea.
Ext. Cost
63501 -0201
K -50 320X240 Thermal Camera Kit'
10
$4,995.00
$ 4,275.00
$ 42,750.00
T198322
Truck Charger
12
$795.00
$ 645.00
$ 7,740.00
63501 -0201
K -50 320X240 Thermal Camera Kit"
2
$4,995.00
N/C
$ -
1st Quarter Promotion: Buy Five (5) K-
50 Thermal Imagining Camera's and
get one (1) K -50 camera free. Good
hr March Z015
$
`Kit Includes: Hard Case, Thermal Imaging
Camera (TIC), (2) Li -Ion Batteries, Tabletop
Charger w /Power Supply, USB Cable,
Retractable Lanyard, Neck Strap, Tripod
Adapter (LING 1/4 " -20), FUR Tools Software
(scratchcard), Documents
Comments
Subtotal $ 50,490.00
`ALL PRICES F.O.B. SPOKANE, WA 99202, CUSTOMER
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHIPPING AND HANDLING
CHARGES.
**ALL PRICES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS.
'* *PRICES QUOTED, GOOD FOR 45 DAYS FROM
2/23/2015.
Shipping $ 325.00
Sales Tax % 9% $ 4,827.43
Total $55,642.43
1- 800 - 745 -3282
www.unifireusa.com
Page 1 of 1
OM (( cj ?;� 9-00 350U
Fax: 509 - 535 -9064
3
THERMAL IMAGING CAMERAS
Recommendation for the Tukwila Fire Department
Prepared by Firefighters Joel Perry and Andy Nevens
Reviewed by Capt. Randy Edwards
November 19, 2014
5
Recommendation
The crew of "B" 54 was tasked with researching and recommending for purchase
new Thermal Imaging Cameras (TICS). We explored a total of 6 different cameras
with various capabilities from the following manufacturers: FLIR, ISG, Bullard, and
Argus.
On October 291h, Joel Perry and Andy Nevens performed a field test with each TIC
at the North Bend Fire Academy. The results of the test are outlined in the pages
to follow.
Best price quotations were solicited from each vendor as well as warranty and
customer service information.
Outside fire agencies were contacted for input on their recent TIC purchases.
Based on the aforementioned factors, we recommend the department purchase
the FUR K50. Our second choice would be the ISG X380.
FUR K50 Pros:
FUR K50 Cons:
$4920 + tax / each
New to the FF market
Great size and shape
Camera picture quality (still pictures) is poor
Detailed and clear picture, good accuracy
Slow start up, <25 seconds
Battery has smart charger
Lag/ hesitation between high to low sensitivity ranges
Extended warranty - 2 yr. components, 10 yr. sensor
Zoom quality poor
Easy transition between modes
FUR made the sensors for Bullard and MSA before
going out on their own.
Field Test recommended by members of Lacey Fire and
Eastside Fire and Rescue
Highly recommended by Portland Fire, Clackamas
County Fire, Poulsbo Fire, and Cowlitz Fire 2
ISG X380 Pros:
ISG X380 Cons:
Been in FF market for many years
$7800 + tax / each (if purchase 6 or more)
Neighboring departments use ISG. Renton is
purchasing the X380 model.
Questionable customer service
Great size and shape
Small lag /hesitation when moving around room
Spokane and Tualatin Valley Fire gave positive
recommendation
3 color scale jumps around — would need training
Great picture
Hot spot finder was great feature
Laser feature would be good during overhaul
Extended warranty — 3 years
NFPA compliant
A
Field Test, Thermal Imaging Cameras - October 29th 2014
Assignment: Review and recommend for purchase new Thermal Imaging
Cameras (TIC) that best meets the needs of the Tukwila Fire Department.
Thermal Imaging Cameras under review: ISG X380, Argus Mi -320, Eclipse LD,
Bullard T4, FUR K50, Bullard T320.
Members of B/54 evaluated the prospective cameras during live fire training at
the North Bend Academy. The TICS were each given approximately 15 -20 minutes
of fire time and graded on their overall function, picture/ display, accuracy and
battery life using a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the best.
• The function grade consisted of the camera's overall size, weight,
ergonomics, and ease of use. Additional features were also considered
within this grade.
• The picture / display grade consisted of the camera's screen size, clarity,
quality, color, ability to distinguish materials at different temperatures.
• The accuracy grade consisted of the camera's ability to determine the
correct temperatures, the ability to quickly change based on different
materials and movement between rooms.
• The battery life grade was determined based on how long the battery
lasted while being used for 15 -20 minutes.
Results of the field test:
FLIR K50: Overall grade, 4.375
• Function, 3.5 - Pistol grip was nice, easy to use buttons with single gloved
hand. Not too heavy, slim profile — good overall size. Initial start had a lag, but
after device has been on its boots right up. Menu feature on screen is helpful.
• Picture, 4 - Picture was very clear in each fire room. Picture is very detailed,
able to see nails and studs behind walls. Screen is good size, good readings.
Unit works in rooms with high heat and low to no heat. Great for a search.
• Accuracy, 5 - Very accurate, able to pinpoint temperatures between materials.
• Battery, 5 - Battery did not lose any life during test — very good.
VA
ISG X380: Overall grade, 4.375
• Function, 4 - The laser feature would be helpful, especially in overhaul
situations. Pistol grip was a plus. Good weight and slim profile. Not bulky or
in the way when hanging off of gear. Buttons are easy to use, especially with
one hand (wearing gloves).
• Picture, 3.5 - Screen size is ok, a little small but able to see everything. Good
clarity between materials and different surfaces. Able to see nail patterns in
plywood & studs behind walls. Bad — a little annoying when the 3 color scale
jumps around- would need training. Small lag/ hesitation in picture when
moving it around room.
• Accuracy, 5 -Hot spot finder is a great feature. Good accuracy between
materials.
• Battery, 5 - No loss of power during test.
Argus Mi -320: Overall grade, 4
• Function, 4 - Good size, easy to use buttons, fire/ search mode is useful.
Handle not ergonomic. Easy to clip on bunkers and move around without it
being in the way.
• Picture, 4 - Screen is small. Temperature readings are small and hard to see.
Clear and detailed picture at high temperatures. No lag between transitions.
Colorization same, doesn't change between modes.
• Accuracy, 5 - Good accuracy between materials. The crosshair was able to
distinguish different material temperatures in close contact with each other.
• Battery, 3 - Battery started full and was 1 bar down by the end of the 15 -20min
test.
Bullard Eclipse LID: Overall grade, 3.25
• Function, 3 - Good size. Not easy to hold and use buttons — felt awkward.
• Picture, 3 - Ok picture, uses only blue to distinguish heat. Others use a few
colors. Picture seemed to wash out in the blue heat — not impressive.
Placement of temperature reading in bad spot.
• Accuracy, 4 - Fairly accurate
• Battery, 3 - Battery lost 2 bars during 15 -20min test.
RI
Bullard T4: Overall grade, 3
• Function, 2 - Unit is very big, bulky, and heavy. Not easy to use with gloved
hands — takes both hands to operate. Pistol grip is better, but it adds more
weight and bulkiness. Without pistol, awkward hand holds.
• Picture, 3 - Picture is decent with good screen size. No temperature number
display —just a scale. Zoom feature not needed. Picture lagged when moving
around room. Recording feature may not be necessary for suppression — fire
prevention feature.
• Accuracy, 4 - Good accuracy, was able to read different material temperatures.
Colorization was the same across rooms.
• Battery, 3 - Battery lost 2 bars after 15 -20min test.
Bullard T320: Overall grade, 3.5
• Function, 2 - Buttons were hard to use with gloved hands. It took both hands
to operate. Hand holds are not good ergonomically. Bulky, not as bad as the
Bullard T4.
• Picture, 3 - Not a clear picture - compared to competitors.
• Accuracy, 5 - Good Accuracy
• Battery, 4 - Battery lost 1 bar during test.
Other: After we had concluded our testing, a few instructors from Eastside Fire
and Rescue, Lacey Fire District 3, and Bates Technical College had a chance to use
each thermal camera. They all concluded the FUR was a superior unit. Eastside
Fire and Rescue had just purchased the Bullard T320, but he said he would take
the FUR over the Bullard they had just bought.
Price Quotations
FUR K50:
Unifire, Inc.
3924 E Trent Ave
Spokane, WA 99202
WRIM
Joel Perry
Tukwila Fire Dist #54
4237 S. 144 St.
Tukwila, WA 98168
206-849-1298
ioeloOOOvahoo.com
Toll-Free: 1-800-745-3282
Phone 971-269-4226
Fax 609-536-9064
WWW Urlifireusa com
Quote
Date Quote #
11/14/2014 10065AJS
Quote By: Jerry Springer
Item
Description
Qty
IVISP
Your Cost Ea.
Ext. Cost
635,01-0201
K-50 320X240 Thermal Carnem Kits
1
$4,995.00
5 4,275.00
S 4,275.00
T198322
Truck Charger
1
$795,00
$ 645.00
$ 645.00
'Kit Includes: Hard Case, Thermal Imaging
Camera (TIC), R2) Li -Ion Batteries, Tabletop
Charger stir /Power Supply, USB Cable,
Retractable Lanyard, Neck Strap, Tripod
Adapter iUNC 1/4'-20), FUR Tools
Software (scr3tCh card), Documents
Comments
Subtotal 6 4,920-00
*ALL PRICES F 0 B SPOKANE, VVA 99202,
CUSTOMER RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHIPPING AND
HANDLI4 ,1G CHARGES
-ALL PRICES IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS.
—PRICES QUOTED, GOOD FOR 45 DAYS FROM
11/14J2014
Shipping
Sales Tax % %
Total $4,920.00
10
ISG X380:
rr at coast
r Of IS UMI
September 3rd, 20,14
Joel Perry
Tukwila Fire Department
444 Andover Park E
Tukwila, WA 98188
OERM
18322 9h St E
�Lake Tap s, WA 98391
Ph 53-826-9852
Fax, 253-826,-98,50
E-Mail- thloffman@tx3.net
Qty
Itern
Disc. Price
Ext Price
1
ISG, X380 package.
S 85O&GO
8,500.00
ncWdes TnC,
(2p 3-hour batle6es
retractable anyard,
truck mount charger,
2 year warrainty,
Hot spot tracker & zoom
batteries for ffe program
'Trai n the trai ner class preser-teak bV II SG
No Charge
No Charg
Subtota]1
S 8,1500. 001
9
Sh piing & Insuirance
$
Subtotal 2
8,600.00
Sales Tax codle 1729
9.81%
$ 817.00
GRAND TOTAL
GRAND T'OTAL
$ 9,417.00
Train the fraenong is a one day ciazz (!witty or w thaut We buMj on a mutuai agreed up,on date. Uasz- wN &-
inafructed by fSG director of wectern zale,7 Jay White. Jay her 14 ye arc of Tf C- tiaortong evpeHence. and 35+
yearc in the Fire ce-roce.
For orders of 6 or rnore new X380 TIC's, price will drop to S8,300.0101 (plius tax
shipping) and a 31" year warranty will Ike added to each TIC,
11
From: "Tracy Hoffman" <thoffman @tx3.net>
Date: November 16, 2014 at 16:44:46 PST
To: "'Joel "' <joelp00 @yahoo.com>
Subject: ISG Final Pricing
Joel,
After a long and heated exchange with ISG and there cost structure, I was able
to match Spokane pricing ($7,800.00) for you IF you order 6 or more TIC's. Let
me know if you have any questions.
I will be in Idaho first of the week but should be home Tuesday evening if you
need anything else.
Regards,
Tracy Hoffman
West Coast Fire & Rescue
1- 888 - 826 -TOOL
0:253- 826 -9852 / C:253- 312 -3939
F:253- 826 -9850
www.westcoastfirerescue.com
12
ADMENDMENT 1
In late November 2014, the crew of B/54 met with Assistant Chief Soss and
presented our recommendation of which thermal imaging camera (TIC) to
purchase. Our findings were based on significant research. We used a rating
system to score each camera, contacted references and departments currently
using the products, and tested each device in a live fire scenario. Out of the six
cameras tested, the FLIR K50 and the ISG X380 tied with the best results.
However, the FLIR K50 was far less expensive than the ISG X380. Since cost was a
factor, we suggested that the department choose FLIR.
In mid - December, Chief Flores asked us to revisit the TIC research. He wanted
additional input from Tukwila Firefighters. We were able to contact the vendors
and place both the FLIR K50 and the ISG X380 on L54 for approximately two
weeks. We requested that each firefighter use the products and give us feedback.
We received approximately ten written responses.
Most of the people that responded liked the ISG over the FLIR. They liked the
clarity of the ISG at longer distances, the hot spot finder, and the laser pointer.
The FLIR did have a couple supporters that did not want ISG because of a history
of poor customer service. Many people noted that the display on the FLIR lagged
or froze when moved around. To be fair, the ISG lagged during our live fire test
and when used during a search scenario at zone 3 truck academy (1/15/15) the
unit had a "blank screen" problem.
The ISG and the FLIR are both quality products and will provide our membership
with better visibility and versatility compared to what we have now. In summary,
we feel these imagers will be an asset to our personnel and provide us with a
valuable tool to use in any situation that may arise.
13
14
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Finance and Safety Committee
FROM: Peggy McCarthy, Finance Director
BY: Vicky Carlsen, Deputy Finance Director
DATE: March 11, 2015
SUBJECT: Fourth Quarter 2014 Cash & Investment Report
ISSUE
The fourth quarter Investment Report is included with this memorandum and is discussed below.
BACKGROUND
City funds are invested to earn a reasonable return while preserving principal and allowing
sufficient liquidity to meet the City's operating needs. To achieve these objectives investments
are diversified by type, by financial institution, and by maturities in compliance with the City
Investment Policy.
DISCUSSION
Portfolio Components
At December 31, 2014, the portfolio totaled $45.4 million comprised of $35.6 million in cash and
cash equivalents and $9.8 in longer term investments. The portfolio balance increased by $4.1
million from September 30, 2014 balance of $41.3 million. A major reason for the increase in
funds is because the City received $3.85 million in long -term funding for the property purchased
earlier in the year. Additionally, Local Improvement District #33 assessments for the first
installment were received during the 4th quarter in anticipation of principal and interest payments
due in January 2015.
In April, the City purchased a Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp agency investment in the
amount of $2 million. It was purchased on April 10, 2014 and will mature on March 4, 2017. This
investment has a .50% yield to maturity.
In June, the City purchased a second agency investment of $1 million from Fannie Mae with a
maturity date of August 23, 2017 and a yield to maturity of .95 %.
Now that funding has been obtained to reimburse the City for the purchase of the motels in the
Tukwila Redevelopment area (Urban Renewal), the City will seek out investments that will
increase the total portfolio yield.
Both investments mentioned above increase the percentage of the City's longer -term investments
and increase portfolio yield because of the higher interest rates on both agencies. Since these
are both longer -term investments, they were placed in the contingency fund where the likelihood
of accessing the available cash in the next few years is remote. The purchase of agencies also
increases the diversity of the portfolio.
15
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
Portfolio Performance
The portfolio weighted average yield at year end was .61 %. Considering the portfolio's weighted
average maturity was 1.0 years, and the yield on the cash & cash equivalent accounts was .32 %,
the portfolio yield of 0.61 % is still relatively favorable. The yield has been sustained by the 3.19%
average yield on the municipal bond investments, the 1.05% yield on the certificate of deposits,
the .67% yield on the agencies, and the .45% earnings credit on the US Bank depository account.
Investment income for the fiscal year for cash equivalents and certificates of deposits is $148,192
plus $129,063 of municipal bond and agencies interest for a total of $277,254 against a budget
of $262,126.
Not included in the portfolio is interest earned from the operating and capital loans to the MPD.
The operating loan is being repaid on a monthly basis and will be paid in full by May 2023. Interest
earned on the loan for fiscal year 2014 is $19,906. The capital loan is being repaid semi - annually
and will be paid in full by December 2022. Interest earned through the end of 2014 is $15,341.
Attached to the investment report are amortization schedules for both loans to the MPD.
Policy Compliance and Liquidity Analysis
As of the end of the 4th quarter, the portfolio profile is well within the range of all the investment
policy parameters. There is currently a healthy mix of investments with a range of maturity dates.
Current investments allow for adequate cash flow requirements.
Fund Cash & Investment Balances
The general fund balance shows an increase of $4.8 million from September 30. Property tax
revenue is received during the 4th quarter, sales tax for December is higher than other months
and $1 million was transferred in from the Facility Replacement fund (Fund 302). The transfer
from Fund 302 accounts for the total decline in capital projects funds, from $3.3 million to $2.3
million.
Debt service funds show an increase, primarily in Local Improvement District (LID) No. 33 (Fund
233). The first annual installment for the LID was due in October but the bond payment is not
made until January 2015.
Investment Environment
Short term interest rates continue to remain low and are expected to remain low until mid -2015
when interest rates could start rising. Information from the Federal Reserve Board indicates that
economic activity is expanding at a solid pace and the labor market continues to show strong job
gains and lower unemployment rate.
The portfolio will be managed to take advantage of investment opportunities as they arise.
RECOMMENDATION
Presentation is for information only
ATTACHMENTS
Cash and Investment Report
Policy Compliance & Liquidity Analysis
Cash and Investment Balances by Fund
Treasury Rates and Yield Curves
Amortization Schedule — MPD Operating Loan
Amortization Schedule — MPD Capital Loan
16
CITY OF TUKWILA
CASH & INVESTMENT REPORT
December 31, 2014
Total Cash & Cash Equivalents
35,562,326
35,562,326
0.32%
(a)
INVESTMENTS
(c)
(d)
Rating
Purchase
Maturity
Term Par
Book
Yield to
Annualized
Agency/Issuer Moody s
Investment Type
Date
Date
Yrs Value
Balance
Maturity
Return
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
5.6
500,000
502,176
3.60%
18,078
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT -- TOTAL
2.9 3,250,000
US Bank
Depository
Various
(b)
$17,514,300
$17,514,300
(e)
81,241
4.05%
20,358
0.45%
Washington State Treasurer
LGIP Investment Pool
Various
(b)
3,934,135
3,934,135
(f) 0.11%
6,336
Columbia Bank
Money market
Various
(b)
14,113,891
14,113,891
(f)
26,580
0.20%
Total Cash & Cash Equivalents
35,562,326
35,562,326
0.32%
114,158
INVESTMENTS
Taxable Municipal Bonds
Certificates of Deposit
City of Marysville, sinking Al LTGO Refunding 11/23/2010 12/1/2017
5.5
415,000
Sound Community Bank Certificate of Deposit 3/4/2014 3/4/2017
3.0 3,000,000
3,147,876
0.85%
30,784
Regal Bank Certificate of Deposit 12/20/2014 12/20/2015
1.0 250,000
250,000
0.50%
3,250
5.6
500,000
502,176
3.60%
18,078
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT -- TOTAL
2.9 3,250,000
3,397,876
1.05%
34,034
Agencies
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp US agency 4/10/2014 5/13/2016 2.1 2,000,000 2,001,867 0.50% 10,000
(FHLMC)
FNMA US agency 6/6/2014 8/23/2017 3.2 1,000,000 998,775 1.00% 10,008
TOTAL AGENCIES
2.5
3,000,000
3,000,642
0.67%
20,008
Taxable Municipal Bonds
City of Marysville, sinking Al LTGO Refunding 11/23/2010 12/1/2017
5.5
415,000
430,309
3.37%
14,501
2014 -2017, ave 5.5 years
Washington State Convention Aa3 Lodging Tax Bonds 11/30/2010 7/1/2016
5.6
500,000
502,176
3.60%
18,078
Center Facility
UW Biomedical Center Aal Revenue Bonds 12/14/2010 7/1/2017
6.6
500,000
502,655
4.05%
20,358
UW Biomedical Center Aal Revenue Bonds 12/14/2010 7/1/2019 8.6 500,000 503,302 4.70% 23,655
Douglas County, ESD, sinking Aal UTGO 12/23/2010 12/1/2020 8.9 1,135,000 1,147,313 4.55% 52,203
2018 -2020, ave 9 yrs
Port of Anacortes Al LTGO 12/17/2010 9/1/2020 9.7 340,000 332,226 5.00% 16,611
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS 7.7 3,390,000 3,417,982 3.19% 109,055
Total Investments 4,4 9,640,000 9,816,500 1.66% 163,096
(a) On calleable bonds, term is calculated to final maturity even though call date may occur first; term of liquid investments is
one day; on sinking fund bonds, average maturity is used to calculate term.
(b) No fixed maturity, funds are available within one day. Percent of Cash & Investment Portfolio
(c) Yield to Maturity represents average rate for the year for various investment vehicles. Municipal
(d) Annualized Return represents actual earnings for the fiscal year for bonds. Bonds�mmniouVO�u
(e) Represents earning credit from US Bank. City earns interest up to the amount of fees.
(f) Represents rate in effect for period ending this report.
the annualized return above the current CD rates.
the annualized return above the current CD rates. Money
(h) Annualized Return represents actual earnings through current reporting period Market
33%
8% 9%
Cash
42%
17
IN
CITY OF TUKWILA
Policy Compliance & Liquidity Analysis
CASH & INVESTMENT REPORT
December 31, 2014
Liauiditv Reauirements and Funds Available for Investina:
Funds immediately available $ 35,562,326
Restrictions & designations:
Operating liquidity (a) 14,000,000
Liquidity threshold 14,000,000
Funds available for longer term investing $ 21,562,326
(a) Represents largest one month decline in portfolio balance over the most recent 36 month period doubled; or the
equivalent of a 100% cushion.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
As of Report Date
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1.0
Portfolio
Available
Available
Available in
Financial Institution Diversification
Portfolio
Within 1 Year
Within 5
5 - 10 Years
Liquidity Analysis & Maturity Diversification
Amount
38.6%
Years
Yes
Funds immediately available
$ 35,562,326
$ 35,562,326
$ 35,562,326
Yes
Fixed Maturity Investments, maturing in:
14,113,891
31.1%
50.0%
Yes
0 -90 days after Report Date
-
6.9%
50.0%
Yes
91 -180 days after Report Date
-
14.7%
50.0%
Yes
Investments maturing in 1 year or less
250,000
250,000
250,000
Investments maturing in 1 -3 years
7,583,658
7,583,658
Investments maturing in 3 -5 years
503,302
503,302
Investments maturing in 5 -7 years
1,479,540
1,479,540
Investments maturing in 7 -10 years
-
-
Investments maturing in more than 1 year
9,566,500
and less than 10 years.
TOTALS
$ 45,378,826
$ 35,812,326
$ 43,899,286
$ 1,479,540
79%
97%
4%
Liauiditv Reauirements and Funds Available for Investina:
Funds immediately available $ 35,562,326
Restrictions & designations:
Operating liquidity (a) 14,000,000
Liquidity threshold 14,000,000
Funds available for longer term investing $ 21,562,326
(a) Represents largest one month decline in portfolio balance over the most recent 36 month period doubled; or the
equivalent of a 100% cushion.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1.0
Portfolio
3.5
POLICY
Policy
Financial Institution Diversification
Amount
% of Total
MAXIMUM
Met?
US Bank
$ 17,514,300
38.6%
50.0%
Yes
Washington State Treasurer
3,934,135
8.7%
75.0%
Yes
Columbia Bank
14,113,891
31.1%
50.0%
Yes
Sound Community Bank
3,147,876
6.9%
50.0%
Yes
Other financial institutions
6,668,624
14.7%
50.0%
Yes
Total
$ 45,378,826
100.0%
Investment Mix
Depository
State Investment Pool
Money market
Certificate of Deposit
US Agency
Municipal Bonds
Total
Weiahted Averaae Maturites:
Certificates of deposit
Portfolio
Amount
17,514,300
3,934,135
14,113,891
3,397,876
3,000,642
3,417,982
45,378,826
Years
2.9
Municipal bonds
7.7
Total Investments
4.4
Total Portfolio
1.0
POLICY MAXIMUM
3.5
Policy Met?
Yes
Note: Cash and cash equivalents are available within one day and are factored
into the Total Portfolio weighted average maturity.
6.6%
i uu.v ro
Performance Analysis
Current portfolio yield
Benchmarks:
6 month treasury
2 year treasury
Local Govt Invst Pool
Policy
Met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
0.61%
0.12%
0.67%
(f) 0.11%
W
POLICY
% of Total
MAXIMUM
38.6%
insured by PDPC
8.7%
75.0%
31.1%
insured by PDPC
7.5%
insured by PDPC
6.6%
75.0%
7.5%
no limit specified in policy
i uu.v ro
Performance Analysis
Current portfolio yield
Benchmarks:
6 month treasury
2 year treasury
Local Govt Invst Pool
Policy
Met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
0.61%
0.12%
0.67%
(f) 0.11%
W
20
CITY OF TUKWILA
Cash & Investment Balances By Fund and Fund Group
CASH & INVESTMENT REPORT
December 31, 2014
liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiililm=�
Balances
BE
12/31/12
Balances
®
$ 3,826,856
$ 3,554,218
$ 3,462,672
12/31/13
General
000
GENERAL
7,824,725
$ 7,737,222
GeneralTotaj .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
861,950
...............................
.........7,8 24.........725
7 3........ 7 7 , 222
Special Revenue
101
HOTEL /MOTEL TAX
432,607
537,454
949,888
103
STREET
1,175,916
1,359,905
4,391,371
104
ARTERIAL STREET
462,014
1,167,156
4,771,625
105
CONTINGENCY
5,766,790
5,762,932
561,688
107
FIRE EQUIP. CUM. RESERVE
-
-
3,686,599
109
DRUG SEIZURE FUND
92,161
75,609
Sp ecial Revenue Total
4,635,412
4,533,184
7,929,489
8,903,056
Debt Service
206
L.I. GUARANTEE
669,147
668,849
2,344,887
207
LIMITED TAX G.O. BONDS 1999
-
-
9,838,504
208
LIMITED TAX G.O. BONDS 2000
-
6,390,261
6,435,672
209
LIMITED TAX G.O. BONDS 2003
1
-
12,478,683
210
LIMITED TAX G.O. REFUNDING 2003
195
497
45,505,067
211
LIMITED TAX G.O. REFUNDING 2008
416
718
212
LTGO SCORE BONDS
2
1,453
213
LTGO SCORE BLD AMER BONDS
-
-
214
LTGO 2010 Series A
2,710
6,561
215
LTGO 2010 Series B
-
-
216
VALLEY COM Refunding bonds 2010
794
74
217
LIMITED TAX GO BONDS REFUNDING
539
514
218
LTGO 2013
-
-
233
LID #33
1,013,693
17,681
Debt Service Total
1,687,496
696,346
Capital Project .... ...............................
301...... ........
LAND ..Q
AC....R.EC.. &.. PARK .. DEVLPMNT.............. ...............................
............1....292..321.....
1,159,366
302
FACILITY REPLACEMENT
1,103,366
2,005,539
303
GENERAL GOVERNMNT IMPROVEMENTS
430,911
516,311
......................
,,.ital
304
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
FIRE IMPACT FEES
504,500
..........1....................
437,222
C a p Project Total
3,33 ,098
4 11 8, 4 38
Enterprise
400
UTILITY ON ACCT (overpayments)
170
-
401
WATER
5,826,837
6,315,350
402
SEWER
4,701,199
2,755,073
404
WATER /SEWER REVENUE BONDS
-
-
405
BOND RESERVE
-
-
411
FOSTER GOLF COURSE
829,633
535,926
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
412
SURFACE WATER ............................... ............1.3,053..771.....
1,695,931
2,612,292
EnterpriseTotal
12,218,641
Internal Service
501
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
4,575,448
4,316,337
502
INSURANCE
4,710,763
6,087,219
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
503
INSURANCE - LEOFF I
526,650
..............9..81.2..a61.....
1,111,132
Internal„Service Total
11,514,688
Grand Total
43,639,440
45,188,392
Balances
Balances
Balances
12/31/12
12/31/11
12/31/10
$ 3,826,856
$ 3,554,218
$ 3,462,672
3,826,856
3,554,218
3,462,672
398,276
416,263
645,914
1,031,761
861,950
607,646
394,755
4,640,647
9,820,315
1,460,454
1,457,728
889,470
944,770
949,888
803,981
161,355
229,711
316,024
4,391,371
8,556,188
13,083,348
13,244
-
70
70
3,006,134
3,303,041
153
246
1,156
1,457
217
5,408
(12,741)
126
707
995
616
-
37
37
37
4,612
5,264
17
14
14,014
814
3,012,381
3,330,312
3,050
1,068,126
1,662,953
4,771,625
2,105,864
2,027,271
2,058,699
164,599
561,688
1,470,658
348,010
313,819
156,018
3,686,599
4,565,730
8,457,000
-
-
13,700
4,635,412
4,533,184
5,767,311
1,584,458
997,382
1,726,671
309,581
32,012
57,199
2,344,887
2,097,280
2,273,623
8,874,338
7,659,857
9,838,504
4,167,390
3,515,168
3,324,596
6,390,261
6,435,672
5,678,846
1,921,032
1,822,186
1,657,049
12,478,683
11,773,025
10,660,491
36,270,227
39,439,330
45,505,067
Funds not included in the Grand Total are the fiduciary funds and the MPD. However, these balances ($1,739,386) are included in the investment balances.
21
22
CITY OF TUKWILA
Treasury Rates and Yield Curves
CASH & INVESTMENT REPORT
December 31, 2014
Ratac at naramhar q1 gn14
Ratac at naramhar q1 gni.q
Source: US Department of the Treasury
Comparison of Treasury Rates
23
Rate
%
liiiiiiiiii�M
Change
Change
3mo
0.04%
- 0.03%
-75%
3mo
0.07%
6mo
0.12%
0.02%
17%
6mo
0.10%
1 Yr
0.25%
0.12%
48%
1 Yr
0.13%
2Yr
0.67%
0.29%
43%
2Yr
0.38%
3Yr
1.10%
0.32%
29%
3Yr
0.78%
5Yr
1.65%
- 0.10%
-6%
5Yr
1.75%
10Yr
2.17%
- 0.87%
-40%
10Yr
3.04%
30Yr
2.75%
-1.21%
-44%
30Yr
3.96%
Source: US Department of the Treasury
Comparison of Treasury Rates
23
24
MPD Operating Loan - through end of 2014 only
Period Accumulated Principal Interest
(Date) Beg Bal Funding Payments Interest End Bal Interest Pmt Pmt
10/1/2011
$ -
$ 191,294
$
$ 319
$ 191,613
$ 319
11/1/2011
191,612.82
-
319.35
191,932.18
638.18
12/1/2011
191,932.18
319.89
192,252.07
958.07
1/1/2012
192,252.07
320.42
192,572.49
1,278.49
2/1/2012
192,572.49
320.95
192,893.44
1,599.44
3/1/2012
192,893.44
-
321.49
193,214.93
1,920.93
4/1/2012
193,214.93
225,000.00
697.02
418,911.95
2,617.95
5/1/2012
418,911.95
-
698.19
419,610.14
3,316.14
6/1/2012
419,610.14
699.35
420,309.49
4,015.49
7/1/2012
420,309.49
700.52
421,010.01
4,716.01
8/1/2012
421,010.01
701.68
421,711.69
5,417.69
9/1/2012
421,711.69
-
702.85
422,414.54
6,120.54
10/1/2012
422,414.54
433,706.00
1,426.87
857,547.41
7,547.41
Prior
11/1/2012
857,547.41
-
1,429.25
858,976.66
8,976.66
12/1/2012
858,976.66
-
1,431.63
860,408.28
10,408.28
1/1/2013
860,408.28
250,000.00
1,850.68
1,112,258.96
12,258.96
2/1/2013
1,112,258.96
-
1,853.76
1,114,112.73
14,112.73
3/1/2013
1,114,112.73
1,856.85
1,115,969.58
15,969.58
4/1/2013
1,115,969.58
1,859.95
1,117,829.53
17,829.53
5/1/2013
1,117,829.53
19,692.58
1,863.05
1,100,000.00
19,692.58
19,692.58
6/1/2013
1,100,000.00
10,121.48
1,833.33
1,091,711.85
21,525.91
8,288.15
1,833.33
7/1/2013
1,091,711.85
10,121.48
1,819.52
1,083,409.89
23,345.43
8,301.96
1,819.52
8/1/2013
1,083,409.89
10,121.48
1,805.68
1,075,094.10
25,151.12
8,315.80
1,805.68
9/1/2013
1,075,094.10
10,121.48
1,791.82
1,066,764.44
26,942.94
8,329.66
1,791.82
10/1/2013
1,066,764.44
10,121.48
1,777.94
1,058,420.90
28,720.88
8,343.54
1,777.94
11/1/2013
1,058,420.90
10,121.48
1,764.03
1,050,063.46
30,484.92
8,357.45
1,764.03
12/1/20131
_
,050,063.4610,121.48
_ __________
_ 1,750.11
1, 041,692.0832,235.028,371.371,750.11_
_ _ ___
___
__
1/1/2014
1,041,692.08
10,121.48
1,736.15
1,033,306.76
33,971.18
8,385.33
1,736.15
2/1/2014
1,033,306.76
10,121.48
1,722.18
1,024,907.45
35,693.35
8,399.30
1,722.18
3/1/2014
1,024,907.45
10,121.48
1,708.18
1,016,494.15
37,401.53
8,413.30
1,708.18
4/1/2014
1,016,494.15
10,121.48
1,694.16
1,008,066.83
39,095.69
8,427.32
1,694.16
5/1/2014
1,008,066.83
10,121.48
1,680.11
999,625.46
40,775.80
8,441.37
1,680.11
Current
6/1/2014
999,625.46
10,121.48
1,666.04
991,170.02
42,441.84
8,455.44
1,666.04
7/1/2014
991,170.02
10,121.48
1,651.95
982,700.49
44,093.79
8,469.53
1,651.95
8/1/2014
982,700.49
10,121.48
1,637.83
974,216.85
45,731.63
8,483.65
1,637.83
9/1/2014
974,216.85
10,121.48
1,623.69
965,719.06
47,355.32
8,497.79
1,623.69
10/1/2014
965,719.06
10,121.48
1,609.53
957,207.11
48,964.85
8,511.95
1,609.53
11/1/2014
957,207.11
10,121.48
1,595.35
948,680.98
50,560.20
8,526.13
1,595.35
12/1/2014
948,680.98
10,121.48
1,581.13
940,140.63
52,141.33
8,540.34
1,581.14 - --
25
Capital Loan to MPD Repayment Schedule
MPD Capital Loan
PAYMENT BEGINNING PRINCIPAL INTEREST INTEREST
DUE DATE BALANCE PAYMENT RATE PAYMENT ENDING
2/1/2013
Amount loaned to the
MPD
1,000,000.00
Prior
6/1/2013
1,000,000.00
(50,731.67)
0.02
(5,833.33)
949,268.33
_ 12/1/2013
_ _949,268.33 _
_ (48,258.90)_ _ _ _ _0.02
_ _ X8,306 10�
_ _ 901,009_43
6/1/2014
901,009.43
(48,681.17)
0.02
(7,883.83)
852,328.26
Current
12/1/2014
852,328.26
(49,107.13)
0.02
(7,457.87)
803,221.13
6/1/2015
803,221.13
(49,536.82)
0.02
(7,028.18)
753,684.31
12/1/2015
753,684.31
(49,970.26)
0.02
(6,594.74)
703,714.05
6/1/2016
703,714.05
(46,537.07)
0.03
(10,027.93)
657,176.98
12/1/2016
657,176.98
(47,200.23)
0.03
(9,364.77)
609,976.75
6/1/2017
609,976.75
(47,872.83)
0.03
(8,692.17)
562,103.92
12/1/2017
562,103.92
(48,555.02)
0.03
(8,009.98)
513,548.90
6/1/2018
513,548.90
(49,246.93)
0.03
(7,318.07)
464,301.97
12/1/2018
464,301.97
(49,948.70)
0.03
(6,616.30)
414,353.27
6/1/2019
414,353.27
(48,277.93)
0.04
(8,287.07)
366,075.34
12/1/2019
366,075.34
(49,243.49)
0.04
(7,321.51)
316,831.85
6/1/2020
316,831.85
(50,228.36)
0.04
(6,336.64)
266,603.49
12/1/2020
266,603.49
(51,232.93)
0.04
(5,332.07)
215,370.56
6/1/2021
215,370.56
(52,257.59)
0.04
(4,307.41)
163,112.97
12/1/2021
163,112.97
(53,302.74)
0.04
(3,262.26)
109,810.23
6/1/2022
109,810.23
(54,368.80)
0.04
(2,196.20)
55,441.43
12/1/2022
55,441.43
(55,441.43)
0.04
(1,108.83)
0.00
(131,285.26)
26
T. 1 k
:r
Po 'ci
Finance and Safety Committee
Quarterly Information Brie.'
4th Quarter, 2014
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
Agenda
Staffing Update
y 4t" Quarter Highlights
Crime Statistics
Finance &Safety
Quarterly Information brief
Highlights
Staffing
New patrol sergeants promoted
■ Mike Murphy
■ Kraig Boyd
Traffic sergeant position filled by Sergeant Eric Lund
Three new officers in the FTO program
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
3
FinarCe & safety
Quarterly Information brief
Highlights
Significant Operations & Events
Traffic Control Assistance for Vice President Biden's Visit
Car Prowl /Auto Theft Emphasis
Light Rail Station Emphasis
Black Friday Operations
Day After Christmas
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
4
Finance &Safety
Quarterly Information brief
Highlights
Other Updates
Trick -or -Treat On Halloween
Cascade and Showalter Care Night
Christmas Caroling
Shop with a Cop
Citizen's Academy
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
5
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
Case Reports
3000
2500
2000
Fourth
Quarter
1500 2005 -2014
cu
® Fourth Quarter
U 1000 Average
500
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
6
Finance & Safety
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
Calls for Service
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Calls for Service
Fourth Quarter 2005-
2014
— — Fourth Quarter Average
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
7
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
40
35
30
25
09 20
45 15
10
5
0
Robbery
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Fourth Quarter
2005 -2014
- Fourth Quarter
Average
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
8
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
16
14
12
10
8
6
2014 Crime Statistics
Robbery Offenses
2014 Compared to Previous Years
<e�
fat PQt aJ
e'Q
Range Since 2005
2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
9
Finance & Safety
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
35
30
25
Aggravated Assault
10
5
0
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Fourth Quarter
2005 -2014
— Fourth Quarter
Average
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
10
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
2014 Crime Statistics
Aggravated Assault Offenses
2014 Compared to Previous Years
Range Since 2005
2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
11
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
70
60
50
a 40
t1
30
20
10
0
Burglary 1st and 2nd Degree
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Fourth Quarter
2005 -2014
Fourth Quarter
Ave rage
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
12
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
2014 Crime Statistics
Burglary 1 -2 Offenses
2014 Compared to Previous Years
<<e`° fat P�� �aA �c. \ P�4.0 Q
OLD �04 OeL
Range Since 2005
-2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
13
Finance & Safety
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
100
90
80
70
N 60
ow
50
o 40
30
20
10
0
Residential Burglary
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Fourth Quarter
2005 -2014
Fourth Quarter
Average
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
14
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
35
30
25
20
15
10
2014 Crime Statistics
Residential Burglary Offenses
2014 Compared to Previous Years
fat QQt �A se9
O`er \-N.O Oee
Range Since 2005
2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
15
Finance & Safety
Quarterly nformation Brief
4t" Quarter Crime Statistics
250
200
a,
150
a,
O 100
50
0
Auto Theft
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Fourth Quarter
2005 -2014
® Fourth Quarter
Average
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
16
Finance & Safety
Quarterly nformation Brief
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
2014 Crime Statistics
Auto Theft Offenses
2014 Compared to Previous Years
fat QQt �A se9
o`er \-N. (54 Oee
Range Since 2005
2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
17
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly Information Brief
4th Quarter Crime Statistics
400
350
300
250
a 200
150
100
50
0
Theft from Vehicle
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 201 3 2014
Third Quarter
2005 -2014
— Third Quarter
Average
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
18
Finance &Safety
Quarterly nformation Brief
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
2014 Crime Statistics
Theft from Vehicle Offenses
2014 Compared to Previous Years
qe�
PJgo c, 6Q
Oe`
Range Since 2005
2014
A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service
19
Finance & Safe ty
Quarterly nformation Brief
Questions?