HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-08-24 Committee of the Whole MinutesTukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Hall Council Chambers August 24, 2015 — 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
CALL TO ORDER /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council President Kruller called the Tukwila City Council meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. and led the
audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
OFFICIALS
Present were Kate Kruller, Council President; Councilmembers Joe Duffie, Dennis Robertson,
Allan Ekberg, Verna Seal, Kathy Hougardy, De'Sean Quinn.
CITY OFFICIALS
Jim Haggerton, Mayor; David Cline, City Administrator; Bob Giberson, Public Works Director;
Chris Flores, Interim Fire Chief; Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator; Jack Pace,
Community Development Director; Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner; Lynn Miranda, Senior Planner;
Laura Benjamin, Assistant Planner; Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst; Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk.
PROCLAMATION
A proclamation honoring "Women's Equality Day."
Mayor Haggerton read a proclamation declaring August 26, 2015 as Women's Equality Day, encouraging
all public officials, educators, businesses, community leaders and the residents of Tukwila to recognize
this special event.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Melanie Bowman, 16026 42nd Avenue South, stated the sidewalks on 42nd Avenue South end three
houses before her home. She asked if there was a plan to extend the sidewalks the entire length of 42nd
Avenue South.
Bob Giberson, Public Works Director, stated the area in question (the intersection of 42nd Avenue South
and South 160th Street) is the boundary line between the City of SeaTac and Tukwila. He explained that
the portion of 42nd Avenue South, south of 160th Street is maintained by the City of SeaTac. City staff has
worked with SeaTac on some roadway issues in the past, and sidewalks for that area are not in SeaTac's
work plan. Mr. Giberson said staff will continue communicating with SeaTac staff and report on the
outcome of those discussions at a future Transportation Committee meeting.
The Councilmembers exchanged comments on the issue, and suggested Ms. Bowman attend a SeaTac
City Council Meeting to voice her concerns.
7:17 p.m. Councilmember Hougardy exited the Council Chambers.
SPECIAL ISSUES
a. An ordinance authorizing and providing for the acquisition of interests in land for the purpose
of completing the South 144th Street Phase II Project; providing for condemnation, appropriation,
taking of land and property rights necessary therefore; providing for payment thereof and
directing the initiation of appropriate proceedings in the manner provided by law and for said
condemnation. Notice of Final Action. The properties considered are located in the City of Tukwila
and identified as parcel numbers: 152304 -9013, 004000 -0205, 004000 -0215, and 004000 -0210 (at 4060
S 144th Street, 14410 4 1st Avenue S, 4057 S 144th Street, and 4053 S 144th Street).
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 2 of 18
Councilmember Duffie indicated this item was discussed at the Transportation Committee meeting on
August 17, 2015. The committee members were unanimous in recommending approval.
Bob Giberson, Public Works Director, explained final design of the South 1441h Street Phase II Project is
nearly complete. Right -of -way is needed along the project location in order to construct the proposed
improvements. The draft ordinance will provide the authority to acquire the right -of -way on four parcels
from the King County Housing Authority.
Council President Kruller called for public comments.
There were no public comments.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
b. Contract Supplement #2 to contract #14 -103 with KPG, Inc., for the South 144th Street (Tukwila
International Boulevard to 42nd Avenue South) acquisition services.
Councilmember Duffie indicated this item was discussed at the Transportation Committee meeting on
August 17, 2015. The committee members were unanimous in recommending approval.
City staff is requesting Council approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with KPG, Inc. in the amount
of $27,239.99 to accomplish services for the South 144th Street Phase II Project. Right -of -way is needed
from four parcels to accommodate the current design, and the proposed supplement will authorize the
consultant to make the initial offers, negotiate with property owners, and execute the necessary
paperwork.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
7:21 p.m. Councilmember Hougardy returned to the Council Chambers.
c. Consultant contracts for the arena project.
Councilmember Quinn indicated these items were discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee
meeting on August 18, 2015. The committee members were unanimous in recommending approval.
Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator, explained RLB Holdings Sports and Entertainment,
LLC submitted an application in May 2015 for State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review for permits
and approvals necessary to construct a multi - purpose sports and entertainment arena in Tukwila. The
City has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared. As is typical for
environmental reviews and projects of this nature, staff contracted with consultants to assist with technical
analyses and project management. Similar to what occurs in other large projects, these costs will be paid
by the developer. Staff would like to amend some of those contracts to expand their scope to carry the
project work through the EIS period and the end of this year.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THESE ITEMS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA OF
THE SPECIAL MEETING TO FOLLOW TONIGHT'S COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
Maximum Amount
Contract #/Firm
Purpose
Current
Proposed
15 -059 Daley Morrow Poblete, Inc.
Water, sewer, stormwater analysis
$20,000
$50,000
15 -078 Skinner Planning and
Environmental Solutions
EIS review
$35,000
$75,000
15 -084 Fehr & Peers
Traffic analysis
$20,000
$40,000
15 -107 Shiels Obletz Johnsen
Project management
$35,000
$100,000
15 -127 Fehr & Peers
Parking analysis
$12,500
$25,000
15 -080 Walker Macy
Architectural design review
$10,000
$10,000
To be determined
Transit analysis
$0
$20,000
Total
$132,500
$320,000
COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THESE ITEMS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA OF
THE SPECIAL MEETING TO FOLLOW TONIGHT'S COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 3 of 18
d. Review and update of three of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan Elements: Tukwila International
Boulevard, Housing, and Residential Neighborhoods, and the Plan's Introduction, Vision,
Glossary and Land Use Map Legend.
The City Council is completing the final portion of a multi -year review and update of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. In order to meet the requirements of the State Growth Management Act and have
the updated Comprehensive Plan certified by the Puget Sound Regional Council, the City must complete
the review and adopt and submit the final Comprehensive Plan in 2015.
Council President Kruller stated the Council will hear from residents on this item prior to the Council's
review of the public hearing comment matrices.
David Puki, 3748 South 152nd Street, stated he was present again this evening to follow up on the
comments he provided during the August 10, 2015 Public Hearing, specifically relating to retaining the
current density of the residential neighborhoods. He feels the City should promote home ownership that
is owner occupied, not subsidize additional stock of low- income housing.
Sharon Mann, 4452 South 160th Street, said she was present to speak on the proposed updates to the
Residential Element, specifically regarding statements about the number of rental units within the City. It
is her opinion that renters come and go with the market, and the Comprehensive Plan mentions the new
people in the community several times. She feels the plan should address home ownership and the long-
term residents. From her perspective, it is the long -term residents that volunteer and participate in the
community, not the individuals living in rental properties. Ms. Mann is proud of the way the Planning
Commission came together to provide the City Council with the proposed updates to the Comprehensive
Plan.
Hyojin Whitford, 12217 46th Avenue South, voiced her support for the reduction of lot sizes in her
neighborhood. With a reduction in the minimum lot size, she would be able to short-plat her property.
Barbara Bader, 13660 Military Road South, said she was present this evening to speak on the Cottage
Housing option in the Neighborhood Element. She asked that safeguards be developed in regard to
cottage style housing that address parking and the number of residents in the units. She asked that the
Council not focus on low- income housing. She explained there are a lot of properties within her
neighborhood, such as Riverton Park United Methodist Church, Cascade View Elementary School, and
Tukwila Pantry food bank, that are exempt from tax collection. New low- income developments would also
be exempt from tax assessments.
Council President Kruller updated the Council on the process to be used for review of the Comprehensive
Plan agenda items this evening. She will ask the Council to review one matrix from each of the elements
at a time, and have Councilmembers identify specific row numbers they would like to discuss.
Councilmember Robertson stated he is not committed to the schedule provided; he feels the Council
should be allowed additional time for review and comments on the proposed updates. He is committed to
working through all the issues. The Council should have the opportunity to talk among themselves on all
of the proposed edits, so each Councilmember understands and is comfortable with the proposed
changes.
Council President Kruller emphasized that the Council has the ability to amend the Comprehensive Plan
once a year. The plan will not be set in concrete and can be changed annually.
Jack Pace, Community Development Director, stated the City's Comprehensive Plan is a 20 -year plan,
and the items before the Council are the final elements to be updated. This has been a three -year
process, with input from the community, Planning Commission, and City Council. He explained staff have
compiled comments relating to the proposed updates to the three Comprehensive Plan Elements. The
goal this evening is to review the comment matrices and have Council provide direction on the proposed
text for each of the elements and other portions of the Comprehensive Plan. Once the text changes are
acceptable, staff will return to a future Council meeting with the finalized and formatted document for
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 4 of 18
Council adoption in the fall of 2015. Mr. Pace stated in addition to the updated sections of the
Comprehensive Plan, staff will update the comments matrices with the Council direction and these will be
made available to the Council. A draft of the plan needs to be submitted to the Puget Sound Regional
Council by October 15, 2015.
After Council discussion it was decided to review the matrices in the following order: Housing, Residential
Neighborhoods, Tukwila International Boulevard, the Plan's Introduction, Vision, Glossary, Land Use Map
Legend and the general comments.
Mr. Pace gave a brief review of the process and events used to seek community involvement in the 2015
update. This included utilizing the Community Connectors, holding community meetings, mailings, digital
media, etc. Mr. Pace noted that the City received an award for the creative use of the Community
Connectors for the Comprehensive Plan Update.
Council President Kruller asked staff to provide the Council with the definition of "Affordable Housing" and
"Housing Diversity."
Laura Benjamin, Assistant Planner, distributed a handout to the Council that provided the definitions as
requested (this handout was also included in the agenda packet). Ms. Benjamin then conducted a
detailed review of the following definitions:
Affordable Housing - Total housing expenditures in excess of 30 percent of household income are
considered "excessive" and viewed as an indicator of a housing affordability problem. This definition of
affordability was established under the United States National Housing Act of 1937.
Housing that is considered affordable depends on household income and needs. There is no set price,
size, or type of affordable housing.
• A household earning less than 30% of the King County area median income (AMI) earns $19,990
or less per year, and can afford to spend about $500 on monthly housing costs. This includes
full -time minimum wage workers.
• A household earning between 30 -50 % AMI earns between $19,991- $33,100 per year, and can
afford to spend about $670 on monthly housing costs. This includes childcare workers, file
clerks, and home health aides.
• A household earning 50 -80% AMI earns between $33,101 - $52,939 per year, and can afford to
spend $1,070 on monthly housing costs. This includes auto repair mechanics, social workers,
and dental assistants.
• A household earning between 80 -100% AMI earns between $52,940 - $66,174 per year, and can
afford to spend about $1,500 on monthly housing costs. This includes paralegals, nurses, and
postal carriers.
• A household earning the King County AMI of $66,175 or more can afford to spend about $1,800+
on monthly housing costs.
Housing Diversity refers to the range of housing options available to residents.
• Diverse, affordable housing is critically important to the health and well -being of children and
families. When housing needs are appropriately met, children are more likely to be healthy and
perform well in school, and parents are more likely to be productive members of a strong
workforce.
• A diverse housing stock is linked to home ownership. Larger, detached single - family homes are
often at prices out of reach for moderate - income families. Townhomes, duplexes, and tri- and
four - plexes offer alternative home ownership options, often at lower prices than single - family
homes.
• Housing diversity is also related to housing accessibility. Housing accessibility is a very important
consideration for the elderly, as well as for other individuals with disabilities.
• Housing diversity can be achieved through a multi - directional approach that includes both new
development and rehabilitation.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 5 of 18
Councilmember Robertson thanked Ms. Benjamin for the information above. He feels there is additional
information that would aid the Council in the discussion relating to affordable housing. He distributed a
handout entitled "Improving the Quality of Housing — Housing in Tukwila — Quick Facts," and reviewed the
data below.
Affordable Housing:
Income Bracket
% of Residents
% of Affordable
Housing Units
King County Affordable
Housing Target
Percentage
Less than 30% of AMI
20%
3.5%
12%
31 -50% AMI
17%
26%
12%
51 -80% AMI
22%
38%
16%
81 +% AMI
41%
32.5%
NA
(AM] = Area Median Income)
Councilmember Robertson said that most of the Council's focus should be on the less that 30% AMI. The
City does not meet the target percentage, and they are the ones who need the most help.
Councilmember Quinn clarified by stating families that fall into the "less than 30% AMI" category earn less
than $19,990 per year and can afford to spend approximately $500.00 per month on housing costs.
Councilmember Robertson said if the City makes that category the area of focus, the City might make a
difference. He clarified that the City would not be creating more housing; rather it would simply be
providing housing to the current residents in that bracket. Additionally, he feels the language that
references duplexes, multiplexes and townhouses should be removed from the draft plan.
Councilmember Quinn commented that the children and families within the City fall into each of the AMI
categories, and he reviewed the different types of entry level professionals for each of the AMI categories.
It comes down to having the housing stock for all groups, so the kids and families within the Tukwila
School District and young professionals have a landing place within the City.
Council President Kruller stated the information provides great targets to hit. However, the City needs to
address all income levels. The City has very different neighborhoods, with different need structures. She
would hope the Comprehensive Plan is not wrapped so tightly that it eliminates future options for the City.
Councilmember Seal thanked Councilmember Robertson for the information, and she understands the
intent. However, she feels the City needs a diversity of housing stock, not just for one particular group. A
viable community has something for everyone. Ms. Seal stated the City is attractive to a lot of young
professionals, and wants the City to keep an open mind to provide opportunities for all by having a variety
of housing stock options.
Councilmember Hougardy clarified that the Comprehensive Plan is the big picture, a vision, the "what"
and not the "how.
Mr. Pace clarified that the proposed policies for the Residential Neighborhood allow flexibility for the City
regarding implementation of the Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Hougardy asked if the City were to focus on affordable housing, would that still fall under
the purview of the City Council.
Mr. Pace clarified that the Zoning Code does not make a distinction between affordable housing versus
market rate housing. If you look at all the South King County cities, it is not an issue of providing
affordable housing; the issue is how cities can improve the condition of the existing affordable housing
stock. The Planning Commission focused on how to improve the existing condition of both the owner
occupied and rental housing stock. The City of Seattle has an elaborate plan for affordable housing, and
they are not able to meet the goal either.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 6 of 18
Councilmember Ekberg stated he would like to see what could be done to improve the current housing
stock, while taking into consideration the long -term residents so they are not negatively affected by the
changes.
Councilmember Robertson referred to comments from the August 10, 2015 public hearing about student
mobility. He feels if the City can have a positive impact on the mobility of school age children, it would be
a success. If the Council tries to focus on everything, nothing will help. There is agreement that the
quality of housing needs to be improved. He would like to see available housing to meet the needs of the
20% of residents in the less than 30% AMI (area median income) group.
Councilmember Hougardy requested that "multi- family" be added to bullet #2 on the "Affordable Housing"
handout.
Ms. Benjamin clarified on bullet #2, under "Housing Diversity," that multifamily housing could fall into that
category, such as condominiums for home ownership.
Councilmember Robertson asked that someone provide what the monthly payment would be on a
$250,000 loan, with today's interest rates. He feels trying to make a duplex, triplex or townhouse
affordable for the bottom three income groups is not doable.
Council President Kruller began the review of the "Housing Element" comment matrix.
Housing Element - Comments on Goals/Policies/Implementation Strategies
Comment
Comment
Staff Comment/analysis/options
Data /Source
(Changes highlighted in underline where
possible)
7
Pg. 2
Include more information on what is
CM Quinn, Council
Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested.
meant by "affordable housing ". Include
Work Session,
Include new information as an informational side
examples of different types /prices of
7.28.15
bar. Sidebar text to read "Total housing
housing affordable
expenditures in excess of 30 percent of
household income are considered "excessive"
and viewed as an indicator of a housing
affordability problem. This definition of
affordability was established under the United
States National Housing Act of 1937. Average
housing costs -- $1,191 for monthly rent for a
three bedroom unit -- in Tukwila are affordable
to households making at least 80% AMI, about
$33,120 annually or $16.56 per hour. Many of
the common occupations in Tukwila pay less
than $16.56. These include: cashiers: $13.55;
childcare workers: $11.59; food service workers:
$12.25; and retail salesperson: $15.28.
Occupations that provide a wage needed to
afford market rate housing include bookkeeping
clerk: $20.53; medical assistant: $18.75;
machinists: $25.82; and painters: $19.86."
(There will also be an informational sidebar with
information on the King County Affordable
Housing Targets.)
Councilmember Hougardy suggested that the language for row #7 have a reference to "2015 figures or
data."
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 7 of 18
11
Pg. 3
Do not support lowering the minimum
David Puki,
Comment Noted.
lot size in single - family neighborhoods.
Council Hearing,
specify amounts of multifamily or single - family
Suggest revising City's lot size to meet
8.10.15
housing. The Zoning Code regulates the density
King County minimum of 7,200 sf.
and lot size of single and multifamily housing
Councilmember Hougardy stated the comment included in row #11 is addressed within the
Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Robertson said he had some concerns with Policy 3.1.2 which reads:
3.1.2 Explore adopting smaller lot sizes, especially in neighborhoods where the historical lot
pattern is smaller than the established 6.7 dwelling units per acre (6,500 square foot lots).
Councilmember Robertson stated he is not interested in exploring smaller lot sizes. He suggests that
Policy 3.1.2 be deleted in its entirety.
Mr. Pace stated the intent of Policy 3.1.2 is to provide some flexibility for neighborhoods within the City,
and deleting that Policy would be a decision for the City Council. Mr. Pace stated that suggestion by
Councilmember Robertson means the City would retain the current lot size for single - family homes at
6,500 square feet.
The Councilmembers exchanged comments on the proposal by Councilmember Robertson. After
Council discussion there was consensus to retain Policy 3.1.2 as written.
14
Pg. 3
Need to keep the current ratio of
Email from Jenny
Housing Element policy language does not
multifamily and single - family dwellings
McCoy, dated
specify amounts of multifamily or single - family
to mitigate transiency. Instead of
8.13.15
housing. The Zoning Code regulates the density
building more apartments, need to
and lot size of single and multifamily housing
upgrade existing to better meet
that can be constructed in different residential
residents' needs.
zones. Maintenance and rehabilitation of
existing multi - family housing is addressed in
Policy 3.4.2.
Councilmember Hougardy commented on row #14, and reviewed the staff response. She asked if there
is a plan to add multifamily housing.
Mr. Pace stated staff will be presenting the Healthy Housing Standards at the September 14, 2015
Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting for Committee consideration. The City is addressing
many of the housing issues through the Residential Housing Inspection Program. Mr. Pace stated there
are no Zoning Code changes being proposed to change any areas from single family to multifamily. The
developments that will add multifamily housing are Tukwila Village and Washington Place.
Ms. Benjamin clarified that Policy 7. 1.1 answers the question from the resident.
Councilmember Ekberg asked if "multifamily" includes condominiums and townhomes.
Ms. Benjamin answered in the affirmative.
Councilmember Ekberg suggested a language change to Policy 3.4.2
"Continue to support the maintenance, weatherization, rehabilitation, and long -term
preservation or replacement of existing housing for low and moderate income residents."
Councilmember Robertson stated he has a new area for proposed edits to discuss. He referred to the
"Home Ownership Options" paragraph, page 3 of the "Housing Element." The language he is concerned
with states " . home ownership is relatively low among Tukwila residents, and is decreasing."
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 8 of 18
Mr. Robertson said the statement conflicts with the McMicken canvassing results, and other research
shows different data. He suggested the statement should be deleted from the paragraph.
Mr. Pace stated the data was obtained from the 2010 Census.
After Council discussion on the above item, there was consensus to update the language to read as
follows:
"Based on 2010 US Census data, home ownership is relatively low among Tukwila
residents, and is decreasing."
Councilmember Robertson stated the following Implementation Strategy should be separated into two
strategies:
"Allowing an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit, a duplex, or a two -unit
condominium /townhouse in the single family zone on all lots that meet the minimum
lot area when various appearance and performance criteria related to impacts on
adjacent properties are satisfied."
"Promote mixed -use developments with ground -level commercial space and residences at and
above the street level in specified area."
Ms. Benjamin clarified that this revision was received at the July 28, 2015 Council work session and is
reflected in the comment matrix.
After Council discussion there was consensus to have the Implementation Strategy read as follows"
"Explore allowing an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit, a duplex, or a two -unit
condominium /townhouse in the siRgle family Low Density Residential zone on all lots that meet
the minimum lot area when various appearance and performance criteria related to impacts on
adjacent properties are satisfied."
9:20 p.m. Councilmember Duffie exited the Council Chambers.
41
Pg. 7
Need additional policy language to
CM Robertson,
Staff Recommendation: Keep as is. Goal 3.5
support the development and
Council Work
and Policy 3.5.1 address this by encouraging a
preservation of housing to attract
Session, 7.28.15
variety of housing for people in all stages of life,
young families to Tukwila.
including young families.
Councilmember Quinn asked if there was some way to add the top ten items that young families are
looking for in a community.
Ms. Benjamin suggested adding a sidebar to Policy 3.5.1 with that information.
9:26 p.m. Councilmember Hougardy exited the Council Chambers.
Councilmember Robertson stated he agrees with everything in the following Implementation Strategy
except: " . establishing a neighborhood council /liaison program," and he feels this language should be
deleted. (The full strategy is listed below)
"Participate at the regional level, by supporting a South King County Housing & Neighborhood
Planner position to work collaboratively with the Planning, Code Enforcement, and Human Services
divisions. This position would aid in the achievement of identified housing needs. Responsibilities
could include: pursuing and overseeing grant opportunities, developing relationships with for - profit
and non - profit stakeholders for city and regional affordable housing development, increasing
representation in regional efforts to fund affordable housing, supporting land use and rental housing
programs to improve the condition of affordable housing for Tukwila's residents, and explore
establishing a neighborhood council /liaison program."
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
9:28 p.m. Councilmember Duffie returned to the Council Chambers.
Mr. Robertson suggested deleting the final part of the sentence or add the word "explore."
Page 9 of 18
After Council discussion, there was consensus to add the word "explore" to the paragraph above.
Ms. Benjamin stated staff would make the requested change.
9:29 p.m. Council President Kruller declared a brief recess.
9:37 p.m. Council President Kruller reconvened the meeting with all Councilmembers in
attendance.
Laura Benjamin, Assistant Planner, provided clarifying information on the public hearing comments matrix
"Residential Neighborhoods Element" with the Council.
Residential Neighborhoods Element - Comments on Goals/Policies/Implementation Strategies
Comment
Comment
Staff Comment/analysis/options
Data /Source
(Changes highlighted in underline where
possible)
20
Pg. 8
Fifth bullet under Implementation
Letter from Pam
Policy language should be flexible to allow for
Strategies should be clarified.
Carter, dated
development of an effective residential LID
Unclear if LID is required in specific
8.10.15
program. Staff Recommendation: Keep as is.
areas, or an option in specific areas.
Revise to read "Require sidewalks
adjacent to all new development.
Develop criteria to offer an alternative
option for participation in a no- protest
LID."
Referring to row #20, Councilmember Ekberg stated that it does not allow for an opt -out clause.
The Councilmembers exchanged comments and asked clarifying questions of staff on the above item.
After Council discussion there was consensus to amend the fifth bullet under Goal 7.2 "Neighborhood
Quality" Implementation Strategy to read as follows:
"Require sidewalks adjacent to all new development or participation in a no- protest LID with all
new residential development in specified areas in support of implementation of the Walk- and -Roll
Plan."
Councilmember Robertson asked staff to explain the intent of Goal 7.4 "Neighborhood Development"
Implementation Strategy bullet 8 that reads:
"Minimize building setbacks to facilitate neighborhood communication, and friendly transition areas
between street, sidewalks, and dwellings."
Ms. Benjamin explained that the intent is to maintain the street scape with new homes. If existing homes
are set back 10 feet, and the current code stated new houses should have a 20 -foot setback, the new
house would be built at the 10 -foot setback to keep the existing streetscape.
Councilmember Robertson suggested that language be added that clarifies that new development will
need to conform to existing dwelling streetscape.
Councilmember Ekberg suggested the word "establish" replace minimize so the text would read:
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 10 of 18
"Establish Minimize building setbacks to facilitate neighborhood communication, and friendly
transition areas between street, sidewalks, and dwellings."
Councilmember Robertson felt additional language should be included in the text to ensure that a setback
cannot be less than other setbacks along the street.
Ms. Benjamin suggested the following language be added to the Implementation Strategy:
"Establish Minimize building setbacks to facilitate neighborhood communication, and friendly
transition areas between street, sidewalks, and dwellings to maintain compatibility."
There was Council consensus with the language changes shown above.
Continuing with Goal 7.4, Councilmember Robertson referred to Implementation Strategy bullet 12.
"Explore Revise code to allow home occupations in detached garages to suppert the development—of
detached garages.
Councilmember Robertson feels "to support the development of detached garages" should be deleted
from the sentence.
There was Council consensus with the language changes above.
Lynn Miranda, Senior Planner, provided clarifying information on the public hearing comments matrix for
the "Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) District Element" with the Council.
Tukwila International Boulevard District Element - Comments on Goals /Policies /Implementation Strategies
Comment
Comment
Staff Commentlanalysisloptions
Data /Source
(Changes highlighted in underline where
possible
GENERAL
COMMENTS
8
Pg. 4, Fig 1.
The northern portions of the
P. Carter, CC
Staff Response: The TIB District boundary
TIB District
District (north of S. 139th and S.
public hearing and
was initially taken from the TO boundary set
Boundary Map
140th Sts.) do not really have a
letter dated
in the 1997 Pacific Highway Revitalization
relationship to TIB as they are
8.10.15; K.
Plan: SR 599 to the north, 42nd Ave. S. to
separated from TIB due to their
Hougardy, email
the east, S. 160th St to the south, and the
topography. The western portion
dated 8.12.14
City limits to the west. During the 2015 joint
is on a hillside and only one
City Council /Planning Commission work
street, S. 132nd St., provides
sessions, excluding the area north of 130th
access to TIB. To the east, only
along TO was discussed, as the zoning /uses
S. 130th St. provides access to
north of that (C /LI & MIC) were very different
the residential area that is below
from those to the south. Continued
TIB. By comparison, the
discussion at the PC meetings resulted in
neighborhoods east of 42nd
the boundaries in the PC- recommended
Ave. S. are more directly
draft element, including the expansion of the
affected by conditions along TIB,
boundary from S. 130th St north to S 126th
yet are not part of the District.
St so that it included the upper corner of the
What is the reasoning for
Riverton neighborhood.
including these areas in the
District?
The area mentioned in the comment is
somewhat disconnected from TIB. See
attached map. One option for consolidating
similar areas is to move the northern
boundary further south on TIB, to the
Regional Commercial zoning straddling the
corner of S. 139th/140th & TIB. Moving
south from there, the west boundary could
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 11 of 18
Councilmember Hougardy voiced her support for the new TIB District Boundary as identified in row #8.
Ms. Miranda reviewed the comments staff received relating to the TIB District Boundary and the proposed
staff change included in the agenda packet.
Councilmember Ekberg referred to row #8, specifically the statement that the second Implementation
Strategy bullet would be deleted from the TIB District and added to the Parks Element of the Comp Plan.
Ms. Miranda stated the project referenced should be part of the Parks Element. However, the City is not
able to amend that Element to add the project. She suggested the reference to the stairs could be moved
to the "Residential Neighborhoods Element."
There was Council consensus with the proposal by staff to move the Implementation Strategy to the
"Residential Neighborhoods Element."
11
Land
Want to preserve the single-
D. Puki and B. Wu,
follow the Medium & High Density
Use /Nodes
family neighborhood.
CC public hearing,
Residential (MDR & HDR) zoning
Concept
Concerned about expanding
8.10.15
boundaries to Military. To the east, follow S.
MDR & HDR zoning from TIB
140th St eastward to 42nd Ave S, and
into single - family
continue south from there.
neighborhoods.
If this boundary change is made, the
following would need to be revised or
deleted:
Under the I -and Use Outside the Nodes
section - they refer to parcels that would fall
outside the TIB District. :
(P. 18) policies 8.2.14 & 8.2.15 - revise
(P. 20) the 1st bullet under Implementation
Strategies - delete
- (P. 20) the last implementation strategy
bullet referring to the possible location of the
northern gateway for the District - revise.
Under Walkability & Connectivity Section.
- (P. 31) 2nd Implementation Strategy bullet
re: adding stairs connecting Southgate
Creek to TIB - delete. FYI, this would be
generally covered in Parks Element.
Councilmember Hougardy voiced her support for the new TIB District Boundary as identified in row #8.
Ms. Miranda reviewed the comments staff received relating to the TIB District Boundary and the proposed
staff change included in the agenda packet.
Councilmember Ekberg referred to row #8, specifically the statement that the second Implementation
Strategy bullet would be deleted from the TIB District and added to the Parks Element of the Comp Plan.
Ms. Miranda stated the project referenced should be part of the Parks Element. However, the City is not
able to amend that Element to add the project. She suggested the reference to the stairs could be moved
to the "Residential Neighborhoods Element."
There was Council consensus with the proposal by staff to move the Implementation Strategy to the
"Residential Neighborhoods Element."
11
Land
Want to preserve the single-
D. Puki and B. Wu,
Comment noted. No change requested.
Use /Nodes
family neighborhood.
CC public hearing,
Staff Response: If the City wants to create a
Concept
Concerned about expanding
8.10.15
transit- oriented development node at the
MDR & HDR zoning from TIB
light rail station, it should consider planning
into single - family
for higher densities /intensities within a 1/2
neighborhoods.
mile walking distance of the station. This
could include allowing higher densities in
areas currently zoned for lower density
residential uses. However, this level of detail
and analysis should occur at the
implementation phase, after this Element is
adopted. At that time, discussions should
include where and when higher densities
should be allowed, and focus on how to
sensitively transition the form & scale of
more intensively developed areas to
adjacent single family neighborhoods.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 12 of 18
Councilmember Robertson referred to row #11 and the reference to the %2 mile walking distance for the
transit - oriented development (TOD) node. He said the' /2 mile walking distance includes a great deal of
residential neighborhoods. In reading the goal for this item, it appears that transit - oriented development
would be allowed within the node and that would impact the residential neighborhoods. He requested the
reference be changed to 1/4 -mile walking distance.
Ms. Miranda clarified that the ' /z mile walking distance was derived from data that shows people will walk
at least a half mile to a high capacity transit station. Staff is proposing to recognize that people will do
that; it is not stating the City intends to rezone the area. Rather, the intent is to create a master plan for
the area within a half mile of a TOD station. If you look at the Arlington, Virginia and the Boston areas,
there are a lot of TOD areas that occur; they did not rezone around the TOD station area. They
preserved the single family neighborhoods, and recognized that people will walk within 'h mile to the
station and they sought areas with sidewalks. She referred to Policy 7.1.1 as the policy that addresses
the preservation of single - family neighborhoods.
Council President Kruller read Policy 7.1.1. for the audience members.
Goal 7.1 — Residential Land Use Pattern, Policy 7.1.1 reads as follows:
"Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of
single - family and stable multi - family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and
clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries."
The Councilmembers exchanged comments and asked clarifying questions of staff on the above item.
After Council discussion there was consensus to add the following to Implementation Strategy, TIB Node,
bullet #3:
"In the interim before a master plan is prepared for the TOD Node, define and establish a TOD Node
overlay zone within '/2 mile walking distance of the Tukwila International Boulevard Station. Consider
amending the development regulations to allow an increase in height and density in the area to the
north of SR 518, similar to that already permitted to the south (10 stories), to attract jobs and
commercial redevelopment. Ensure the preservation of existing single family neighborhoods."
Additionally, staff will include a reference as to where the' /2 mile walking distance reference was
obtained.
18
Pg. 18, Land Use
I don't believe that
P. Carter, CC
Staff Recommendation: No change required.
Outside the
opportunities for retail should
public hearing and
See above comment - this policy applies to
Nodes, Policy
be expanded into the
letter dated
commercial and multifamily properties
8.2.10
residential neighborhoods of
8.10.15
outside the Nodes.
the District.
The Councilmembers exchanged comments and asked clarifying questions of staff on Policies 8.2.10,
8.2.11, and 8.2.12:
Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) District Element, Goals and Policies:
"Land Use Outside the Nodes" Policy 8.2.10: "Allow a diverse mix of uses, including residential,
commercial services, office, recreational and community facilities. Allow limited new retail in the TIB area
outside the nodes; once the nodes are established, expand opportunities for retail outside the nodes.
"Land Use Outside the Nodes" Policy 8.2.11: "Allow those types of light industrial uses that require hand -
on labor and operate in such a manner that no nuisance factor is created and the scale of such activities
does not conflict with the TIB District vision of a walkable, pedestrian- oriented neighborhood.
Land Use Outside the Nodes" Policy 8.2.12: "Allow stand -alone multifamily residential buildings outside
of the nodes.
After Council discussion, there was consensus to have staff make the following language edits:
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 13 of 18
"Land Use Outside the Nodes" Policy 8.2.10 "On commercial properties, along or near TIB, allow a
diverse mix of uses, including residential, commercial services, office, recreational and community
facilities. Allow limited new retail in the TIB area outside the nodes; once the nodes are established,
expand opportunities for retail outside the nodes.
"Land Use Outside the Nodes" Policy 8.2.11: "On commercial properties along or near TIB, allow those
types of light industrial uses that require hand -on labor and operate in such a manner that no nuisance
factor is created and the scale of such activities does not conflict with the TIB District vision of a walkable,
pedestrian- oriented neighborhood.
32
Pg. 26, Urban
Add implementation measure
A. Ekberg, CC
Staff Recommendation: Add the following
Form,
about preparing a feasibility
work session,
Implementation Strategy: Prepare a study
Implementation
study for a parking structure.
7.28.15
investigating the overall feasibility of
Strategies
reduces prostitution and drug
8.12.15.
developing a public parking structure within
Strategies
traffic along TIB. Closure of
the TIB District, including identifying potential
Deja Vu around 150th St,
sites.
The Councilmembers exchanged comments on row #32, and after Council discussion there was
consensus to add the following new Implementation Strategy:
The Implementation Strategy will read as follows:
"Seek the development of a parking garage at Sound Transit's Tukwila International Boulevard Station
property."
Ms. Miranda stated staff has another edit she would like the Council to consider. She referred to row #25;
the comment from Mr. Kim was received at the August 10, 2015 Public Hearing.
25
Pg, 20, Land Use
The area will remain as is
C. Kim, CC public
Staff Response: A version of the following
Outside the
without much improvement
hearing, 8.10.15,
policy was in the "old" Transportation
Nodes,
unless the City further
and letter dated
Corridors Element but was deleted because
Implementation
reduces prostitution and drug
8.12.15.
the City has adopted regulations governing
Strategies
traffic along TIB. Closure of
the location of adult entertainment uses.
Deja Vu around 150th St,
which has been a magnet for
If desired, the following implementation
prostitution and related
strategy could be added back to the "Land
criminal activities, will help
Use Outside The Nodes" section: Explore
greatly to reduce criminal
appropriate actions for the City to take to
activities.
pursue amortization of non - conforming adult
entertainment uses, such as purchasing
leases.
Ms. Miranda explained staff has suggested alternate language for the Implementation Strategy to read as
follows:
"Explore appropriate actions for the City to take to pursue amortization of non - conforming
uses."
There was Council consensus with the staff recommended change above.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 14 of 18
Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner, provided clarifying information on the public hearing comments matrix for
the "Introduction, Vision, Glossary, and Map Legend" with the Council.
Introduction, Vision, Glossary, Legend - Comments on Goals/Policies/Implementation Strategies
Comment
Comment
Staff Commentlanalysisloptions
Data /Source
(Changes highlighted in underline where
possible)
INTRODUCTION
5
Pg. 5
2nd paragraph - -- Certain elements are
Staff edit, 8.17.15
Staff Recommendation: Add the following:
no longer needed per updates that
During the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update,
have been made in the Plan. Add
the introductory "Obstacles to Plan
wording to reflect deleting the
Achievement" section, as well as optional
discussion of "Obstacles to the Plan"
Annexation and Maintenance of the Plan
section and the Annexation and
elements, were deleted as they have
Maintenance of the Plan elements.
accomplished or are covered in other parts of
the Plan. The issues discussed in the "Obstacles
to Plan Achievement' have been addressed in a
positive and action - oriented manner through
policies and strategies in the "Community Image
and Identity" and "Roles and Responsibilities"
elements. Proposed annexations have been
largely accomplished, and remaining
annexation - related issues are addressed
through policies in the Community Image and
Identity, and Tukwila South elements. Policies
that pertain to revising and updating the
Comprehensive Plan have been codified in
Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.80.
Councilmember Ekberg stated the word "been" is missing from the text for the staff recommendation. It
should read as follows:
"During the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update, the introductory "Obstacles to Plan Achievement" section,
as well as optional Annexation and Maintenance of the Plan elements, were deleted as they have been
accomplished or are covered in other parts of the Plan. The issues discussed in the "Obstacles to Plan
Achievement' have been addressed in a positive and action - oriented manner through policies and
strategies in the "Community Image and Identity" and "Roles and Responsibilities" elements. Proposed
annexations have been largely accomplished, and remaining annexation - related issues are addressed
through policies in the Community Image and Identity, and Tukwila South elements. Policies that pertain
to revising and updating the Comprehensive Plan have been codified in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter
18.80."
There was Council consensus to accept the change suggested by Councilmember Ekberg.
Council President Kruller continued the review of the comment matrix. After Council discussion on the
above item, there was consensus with the staff recommended changes.
Council President Kruller moved on to Council review of the "General Comments" Matrix in the agenda
packet.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
Page 15 of 18
General Comments
Comment
Comment
Staff Commentlanalysisloptions
(Changes highlighted in underline where possible)
Data /Source
1
Lack of outreach regarding zoning code updates.
Pat Malara,
Comment appears to fall outside scope of
Unaware of zoning code updates since purchased
Council Hearing,
the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update.
property in Allentown, such as 6,500 sf minimum lot
8.10.15
Development standards in the LDR zone
size in LDR zones.
were last updated in 2001. When zoning
code is updated to be consistent with the
updated Comprehensive Plan, staff can
explore more robust outreach processes.
Comment noted.
2
Outreach and information on the proposed updates
David Puki,
In an effort to make the update material
to the Comprehensive Plan were insufficient. Unable
Council Hearing,
more user friendly, staff created one page
to access documents online and would like a
8.10.15; Email
"fact sheets" for each element. In 2015,
summary /highlight sheet rather than reading very
dated 7.13.15
staff utilized a variety of outreach
long documents.
techniques including emails, mailings,
articles in the Tukwila Reporter and E-
Hazelnut, posting materials on the City
website, as well as holding a community
open house and attending all "See You in
the Park" events. Outreach efforts can
always be improved. Comment noted.
3
Cannot attend evening meetings on weekdays as
David Puki,
Council work sessions, public hearings, and
they conflict with work. Would prefer meetings on
Council Hearing,
deliberations have taken place as part of
Saturdays.
8.10.15; Email
Committee of the Whole meetings, which
dated 7.13.15
meet on Monday evenings. Comment
noted.
4
What happens if Growth Management Act (GMA) or
Email from CM
Goals expressed in the Comp Plan are not
other similar regional goals are not met?
Hougardy, dated
specific requirements. Even if they are not
8.12.15
achieved, as long as the City is working to
meet the goals it has committed to in its
policies, adopted plans and development
regulations, there wouldn't be specific
consequences.
Note: The Puget Sound Regional Council
(PSRC) requires jurisdictions to submit draft
Comp Plan updates by October 15, 2015 in
order to be considered for grants in 2016.
5
Would it be appropriate to have another outreach to
Email from CM
In 2015, staff utilized a variety of outreach
the community regarding the final version of the
Hougardy, dated
techniques including: emails, mailings,
Housing /TIB /Neighborhood elements of the
8.12.15
articles in the Tukwila Reporter and E-
Comprehensive Plan, due to its impact on our
Hazelnut, posting materials on the City
residents?
website, and communications to the
Community Connectors. A community
open house was held and staff attended all
"See You in the Park" neighborhood events
to hear from the public and provide
information. Staff feels that outreach to
date is sufficient.
Councilmember Robertson, speaking on row #5, stated that single family residents are not aware that
allowing ADUs (Accessory Dwelling Units), townhomes, and multi - plexes is part of the Comprehensive
Plan update. He said more outreach, such as public meetings, a public hearing, etc. needs to take place
so the residents are aware of the changes.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 16 of 18
Council President Kruller asked staff to update the Council on the process that would be used to conduct
a second public hearing.
Mr. Pace stated the City would publish a notice in the newspaper providing specific information on the
public hearing, and the City does very well with publicizing legislative hearings. He feels Councilmember
Robertson is suggesting specific techniques for outreach in the future.
Councilmember Robertson said there should be another public hearing on the current edits before the
Council adopts the Comprehensive Plan.
Council President Kruller said the goal is to adopt the proposed edits to the Comprehensive Plan on
September 21, 2015. She asked if Councilmember Robertson is requesting another public hearing on the
current edits.
Councilmember Robertson stated that the City should conduct specific outreach to the residents that says
the City is considering duplexes, triplexes, townhouses and smaller lot sizes in single family
neighborhoods.
Councilmember Hougardy stated that implementation strategy 7.1.2 answered all of the
questions /concerns she had on the proposed edits to the plan. If the City chose to conduct additional
community outreach on things learned as a part of the last two work sessions, she is in favor of that.
However, she was opposed to starting over with a new hearing.
Council President Kruller stated due to the lateness of the hour, the "how" to update the community on
the edits can be discussed at another time. She said it was a good comment, and it has been noted that
more communication outreach is desired.
Council President Kruller asked if there was consensus to move forward with the recommendations and
amendments discussed this evening so that staff can begin finalizing the edits for Council adoption on
September 21, 2015.
Councilmember Robertson stated he would agree with Council President Kruller, with the understanding
that there will be additional outreach to the single family residential community that informs them that the
City is exploring the 2015 changes.
Council President Kruller asked that staff find a way to communicate with the community on the status of
the proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan. She asked Councilmember Robertson if he is
expecting the Council to make additional changes to the Comprehensive Plan based on further outreach.
Councilmember Robertson feels the City has not given the single family residents the opportunity to
comment on the proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan.
Council President Kruller asked if there was consensus to hinge the decision by the Council on the
additional community outreach.
Councilmember Seal commented that outreach should not be limited to the residential areas; there are a
lot of edits to the Comprehensive Plan. The residential neighborhoods are only one portion of the
proposed plan update.
Councilmember Ekberg voiced his support for new communication to the residents that explains the
finalized edits to the Comprehensive Plan are a result of the City's standard process.
Council President Kruller asked staff if that type of communication could be completed through the City's
Communications group.
David Cline, City Administrator, stated City Administration would work with Mr. Pace on the best way to
get the word out about the proposed 2015 updates to the Comprehensive Plan, to include a draft plan.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015 Page 17 of 18
Councilmember Duffie asked if the community members would have an opportunity to respond to the
revisions to the plan.
Mr. Pace said the question to the Council is if they are asking for another public hearing, a new public
comment matrix and additional edits to the Comprehensive Plan. If the community has another chance to
comment, the process would start again.
Councilmember Hougardy stated it should not be a new public hearing /meeting, rather public outreach on
the edits to the Comprehensive Plan. She feels the Council has completed the process.
Councilmember Quinn stated he concurs with the previous statements. There has been a process for the
update, and the Council has reviewed the comments received and proposed edits to the Comprehensive
Plan. The "how" should be clear that the comments received by either the Planning Commission or
Council Public Hearings have been taken into consideration. The additional communication to the
residents should also thank the residents who took the time to comment on the proposed edits.
Councilmember Duffie stated the Council needs to make a decision on whether to move forward with the
edits or begin again.
Councilmember Robertson stated that the Comprehensive Plan is laying the groundwork for a significant
change to single family housing in the City, and he feels the residents are not aware of the proposed
changes. Very few residents have read the proposed edits. He feels going forward with changes that the
residents are not aware of is misleading.
Council President Kruller feels the Council has worked diligently on the update to the Comprehensive
Plan. She suggested that staff update the comment matrices and provide those to the Councilmembers,
so they can show the process used for the current update. Ms. Kruller reminded the Council there is an
opportunity to amend the Comprehensive Plan once a year. It has been said the Comprehensive Plan is
high level, and there is flexibility for the City to make changes in the future. Additionally, communicating
to the community on the finalized edits to the Comprehensive Plan would be a good idea to ensure the
City is in compliance.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED, WITH ROBERTSON DISSENTING, TO HAVE STAFF MOVE
FORWARD WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS LISTED IN THE MATRICES, AS AMENDED BY THE
COUNCIL TONIGHT. (TO BE FORWARDED TO THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 REGULAR MEETING).
Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk, asked the Council if there was consensus to extend the Council meeting
(past the 11:00 p.m. deadline) to conduct the Special Meeting.
There was Council consensus to extend the Council meeting until 11:10 p.m
REPORTS
Due to the lateness of the hour the Council dispensed with reports.
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
August 24, 2015
ADJOURNMENT
Page 18 of 18
11:06 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KRULLER DECLARED THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING ADJOURNED TO CONVENE A SPECIAL MEETING.
Kate Krul er, ounce President
Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT: 9/14/15
AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE: 9/15115