Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit M11-095 - PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS
PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D Mi 1 -095 City oikukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Inspection Request Line: 206 - 431 -2451 Web site: http: / /www.TukwilaWA.gov MECHANICAL PERMIT Parcel No.: 3523049112 Address: 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D TUKW Project Name: PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS Permit Number: M11 -095 Issue Date: 11/29/2011 Permit Expires On: OS/27/2012 Owner: Name: SEGALE PROPERTIES LLC Address: PO BOX 88028 , TUKWILA WA 98138 Contact Person: Name: DAVID WHALEY Address: 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D , TUKWILA WA 98188 Email: D.WHALEY @PROPLAS.COM Contractor: Name: ARGO BLOWER/MFG CO INC Address: 5400 E MARGINAL WY S , SEATTLE WA 98134 Contractor License No: ARGOBM *242KC Phone: 253- 872 -7430 Phone: 206 762 -9336 Expiration Date: 04/25/2012 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: DUST COLLECTOR TO BE INSTALLED IN NEW BUILDING. DUCT WORK TO BE INSTALLED BY ARGO BLOWER. Value of Mechanical: $6,364.00 Type of Fire Protection: UNKNOWN Electrical Service Provided by: Permit Center Authorized Signature: Fees Collected: $269.31 International Mechanical Code Edition: 2009 1.A-) . 4L Date: It C I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I am authorized to sign and obtain this mechanical permit and agree to the conditions on the back of this permi Signature: Print Name: Date: /12 9.'i This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. doc: IMC -4/10 M11 -095 Printed: 11 -29 -2011 • • PERMIT CONDITIONS Permit No. M11-095 I: ** *BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 2: No changes shall be made to the approved plans unless approved by the design professional in responsible charge and the Building Official. 3: All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be at the job site and available to the inspectors prior to start of any construction. These documents shall be maintained and made available until final inspection approval is granted. 4: All construction shall be done in conformance with the approved plans and the requirementslof the International Building Code or International Residential Code, International Mechanical Code, Washington State Energy Code. 5: Manufacturers installation instructions shall be available on the job site at the time of inspection. 6: All electrical work shall be inspected and approved under a separate permit issued by the City of Tukwila Building Department (206- 431 - 3670). 7: VALIDITY OF PERMIT: The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Tukwila. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the code or other ordinances of the City of Tukwila shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other data shall not prevent the Building Official from requiring the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data. 8: ** *FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 9: The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 10: The dust collector system and equipment shall be installed in accordance with the Fire Protection Engineers' alternate means of compliance, the revised drawing and the manufacturers installation guidelines. 11: Contact The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau to witness all required inspections and tests. (City Ordinances #2050 and #2051) 12: Any overlooked hazardous condition and/or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. 13: These plans were reviewed by Inspector 511. If you have any questions, please call Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau at (206)575 -4407. doc: IMC-4/10 M11-095 Printed: 11 -29 -2011 CITY OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 http://www.TukwilaWA.dov Mechanical Permit No. M, 1 1 Project No. \\ _ 6 W W (For office use only) MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. * *please print ** SITE LOCATION • . • . • . ' . • King Co Assessor's Tax No.: Site Address: 6233 Segale Park Drive D Tenant Name: Professional Plastics Suite Number: New Tenant: Property Owners Name: Segale Properties Floor- VI Yes ❑..No Mailing Address: 5811 Segale Park Drive C Tukwila WA 98138 Zip City State CONTACT PERSON — who do we contact when your permit is ready to be issued Name: David Whaley Mailing Address: 6233 Segale Park Drive D E -Mail Address: d.whaley @proplas.com Day Telephone: (253) 872 -7430 Tukwila WA 98188 City State Fax Number: (253) 872 -7704 Zip MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: c2(y 0 B\0(..0-el Mailing Address: _5400 foS•r- Wavy i P%0.t L )& Contact Person:iu_ ��- / E -Mail Address: DS Z. L A- 0.r7 c, towel LO •• Contractor Registration Number: at)) A O t3 nR * z-112.14 C.- City Day Telephone: LOA Q 'I3y State Zip z0(0. -76.2 -933(0 Fax Number: ZO(e • ~1 (o L' z.30j Expiration Date: q. ZS iZ ARCHITECT OF RECORD — All plans must be stamped by architect of record Company Name: epto Mailing Address: Contact Person: E -Mail Address: City Day Telephone: Fax Number: State Zip ENGINEER OF RECORD - All plans must be stamped by engineer of record' Company Name: Mailing Address: Contact Person: E -Mail Address: H:\ Applications\Pomu- Applications On Line \2010 Applications \7-2010 - Mechanical Permit Application.doc Revised: 7 -2010 bh City Day Telephone: Fax Number: State Zip Page 1 of 2 • • Valuation of project (contractor's bid price): $ 6r3C04( • Scope of work (please provide detailed information): Dust collector to be installed in new building. wo'k j AS 4-ct ll cL by G r9 0 13i0rJ27 . Use: Residential: New ❑ Replacement ❑ Commercial: New ❑ Replacement m Fuel Type: Electric m Gas ❑ Other: Indicate type of mechanical work being installed and the quantity below: Unit Type: • . • ' • • Qty Unit Type:- • •- Qty Unit Type: . ' - • Qty Bioler /Compressor 0 -3 hp /100,000 btu Qty furnace <100k btu air handling unit >10,000 cfm fire damper furnace >100k btu evaporator cooler diffuser 3-15 hp /500,000 btu floor furnace ventilation fan connected to single duct thermostat 15 -30 hp /1,000,000 btu suspended/wall /floor mounted heater ventilation system wood/gas stove 30-50 hp /1,750,000 btu appliance vent hood and duct emergency generator 50+ hp /1,750,000 btu repair or addition to heat/refrig/cooling system Incinerator — domestic other mechanical equipment 1 l0uf� /�e c�� air handling unit <10,000 cfm incinerator — comm/ind PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES - Value of construction — in all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the permit center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of plan review — applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may grant one extension of time for additional periods not to exceed 90 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. Section 105.3.2 international building code (current edition). I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. BUILDING O ER OR7 ZED AGENT: Signature: Print Name: David Whaley Date: 7.7 // Day Telephone: (253) 872 -7704 Mailing Address: 6233 Segale Park Drive D Tukwila WA 98188 City State Zip Date Application Accepted: 1 _ t)—� Date Application Expires: Staff InitialsW H:\Applications \Forms - Applications On Line \2010 Applications \7 -2010 - Mechanical Permit Application.doc Revised: 7.2010 bh Page 2 of 2 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.TukwilaWA.gov RECEIPT Parcel No.: 3523049112 Permit Number: M11 -095 Address: 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D TUKW Status: PENDING Suite No: Applied Date: 07/12/2011 Applicant: PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS Issue Date: Receipt No.: R11 -01431 Payment Amount: $269.31 Initials: WER Payment Date: 07/12/2011 11:38 AM User ID: 1655 Balance: $0.00 Payee: DAVID WHALEY TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Descriptio Amount Payment Credit Crd VISA Authorization No. 454395 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description 269.31 Account Code Current Pmts MECHANICAL - NONRES PLAN CHECK - NONRES 000.322.102.00.00 215.45 000.345.830 53.86 Total: $269.31 doc: Receiot -06 Printed: 07 -12 -2011 • • ' INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. .CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila. WA 98188 tz. (206) 431 -36 Permit Inspection. Request Line (206) 431 -2451 mil -05 S Project•: • • . . P A ( SSmv?L PLASrie Type of Inspection: S /= iNP3 L Address: 6,2,7_5'. s.,-. C f%G e. PAdtic. Date Called: j), ,. Special-Instructions: • , ,p- .),.,?:E• i,v# L q r 5-4ti -1 Date Wanted:. . �a.m1 12 b `/ /// p.m~ Requester: Phone No: oZ 5.-.-R L 872 - 74/ 3 a • Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 2k,'v'.- 49 • )1W/P1 ;1 ( if /Fig /'F A/4/ Date: / Z / /,, R 114 ECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior teTnext inspection. fee must be t 6300 Southcenter Blvd.. S ite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. INSPECTION NUMBER • • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NUMBERS CITY OF TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT 444Andover Park East, Tukwila, Wa. 98188 206- 575 -4407 Proj JS I 6 tti AL 1 r ` Type of In pection: Fire Alarm: Address: 6;33 e9/ - %. Contact Person: \ Suite #: Special Instructions: Phone No.: (A-Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Sr �i iv 001` -- d Needs Shift Inspection: Sprinklers: Fire Alarm: Hood & Duct: Monitor: Pre -Fire: Permits: - Occupancy Type: z Inspector: •ty.., C Date: / 2 / /W /A Hrs.: ( $100.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. You will receive an invoice from the City of Tukwila Finance Department. Call to schedule a reinspection. Billing Address Attn: Company Name: Address: City: 1 State: 1 Zip: Word /Inspection Record Form.Doc 6/11/10 T.F.D. Form F.P. 113 SEPARATE PEi;MiT REQUIRED FOR: Mechanical Electrical Plumbing City of Tukwila BUILDING DIViSIDN Andria File Conf Mike Doni o copy /fax /file m To I Ramp order / pop FILE COPY Permit No., IA I —0°1C Plan review approval is sidled to enws and (missions. Approval of construction documents does not authorize fix violation of any adopted code or ord. Receipt EIiaA1 approved �.. . and + is advro ed: By • / 6 Data �/ , � l Break AIR CI gr :sw gralgr 1 gratgr aP: or 1 arts, 1 anaor I *rim REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVED NOV 2 1 2011 ila City of ru 2(O S$ ;OK cd rlc S ¥ ►Ls US �- (—O \ e GV■ v ✓A- M 1 ) 006 grain! leatgr gr:PP IV alar *ratsr armor t sr: tar I araec I ari tor I swam) scamp Oeralor I aerator I *!steer 1 sox sr 1a, sty farm A 16' Q City Of Ttikwila BUILDING D1VISIQN Rod Raddng wits! 1 Ws tW Ira VP flwillcall chop saw 0 2.5x4 -3x3 ila1S, L Paso. i1:1! F70o1" -iv k- th or f/ e// h( 1'2(9 Ic-ri r` !7 1 04 6-0/keia-- 0 8" Proposed DuctWork Opporator l LJLLI Li 25 x 25 1 REVISIONS No changes shall be made to the scope of work without prior approval of Tukwila Building Division. NOTE: Revisions will require a new plan submittal and may include additional plan review fees. IIULI 21x21 Duct work to be 8n 20 Ga galvanized alum supported from ceiling with seismic braces near each machine 0 Legs (x4) see ipment nchorage Equipment Anchorage Proposed Bolt: Hilti KB 7Z .375' x 3.5" Leg (x4) .5" hole 2.5"x 2.5" foot Plate 0 a 2.5" -2.75" 0 a nuo? t *Ti no 1 *rior t a ,star farms! _t arms. !:T :1of? 1 *Tsui? 1 as. nun? t *ran" f gr :1n? f for i *Thor 4 we :tar 1 *raw eV Cif 1 2 Pa — *FEW 1 aPatner 1 sPaoP I srateer I (Pats? 1 :ra VP 1 aP atgr aP =R! I gr :10er 1 SPEW I aPa101r 1 ar tiff? 1 Wall, 1 CORRECTION LTR #_L_ M I vFl RECEIVED NOV 0 3 2011 .� . 'NEMER fi pze • THE FIRE PROTECTION INTERNATIONAL CONSORTIUM, INC. FIRE PROTECTION - LIFE SAFETY - CODE CONSULTING SECURITY - PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN http://www.the-fplcom October 10, 2011 Tukwila Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau Alan Metzler, Fire Project Coordinator 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Tukwila Building Department Dave Larson 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Professional Plastics David Whaley 6233 Segale Park Drive D Tukwila, WA 98188 Dust Collector Alternative Compliance with IMC 511.1.1 At the request of Professional Plastics, Fire Protection International Consortium, Inc. has examined the permit application review letters received from the City of Tukwila Building Division and Fire Prevention Bureau dated July 14, 2011 (revised July 22, 2011) and July 19, 2011 respectively. An alternative means of compliance allowing the dust collector to be installed inside the building is being requested. The letters note three items requiring attention before Professional Plastics submittals can be approved for permit: 1) Installation of an approved automatic fire suppression system in any ducts conveying flammable /combustible materials where the diameter of the duct is 10 inches or greater. 2) Submitted plans showed duct diameter reduced from 14 inches to 10 inches, but fans specifications call for 14 inches. 3600 Clayton Road, Ste E Concord, CA 94521 (925) 825 -4643 w.comeaux@the- fpi.com 1202 N 75th St. #279 Downers Grove, IL 60516 (630) 985 -3106 j.schultz @the- fpi.com 9702 SW 57th Street Cooper City, FL 33328 (305) 915-0488 rids ©the- fpi.cam RECEIVEP CITY OF TU LA (lr,T 1 1 2011 PERMIT CENTER /yC 1420 Marvin Road4 4" Suite C #432 filZ ��� Lacey, WA 98518 (3 (3600) 878-9267 c.anderson@the- fpi.com MWOI5 Fire Protection International Consortium, Inc. 3) Compliance with 2009 IMC section 1102.2 requirements for "factory-built equipment and appliances." 4) Compliance with IMC and NFPA 664 requirements for location of the dust collector. Each of these items is addressed below. 1) Any ducts conveying flammable /combustible materials where the diameter of the duct is 10 inches or greater will be equipped with fire suppression in accordance with 2009 IMC section 510.7. 2) Duct diameter will be revised to comply with the IMC. 3) The IMC section noted (1101.2 — Factory-built equipment and appliances) and UL 207, 412, 471 and 1995 refer specifically to refrigeration systems and their components. See section 1101.1 for the scope of this code chapter. These standards do not apply to the dust collector in question. The general IMC requirement for appliances to be listed does not apply because the dust collector is defined as equipment rather than an appliance in accordance with the IMC. Professional Plastics requests that the Belfab DW dust collector be recognized as acceptable based on Belfab building the unit to comply with industry recognized standard, NFPA 664. 4) 2009 IMC section 511.1.1 and NFPA 664 call for the dust collector to be installed outside the building with several exceptions allowing the unit to be located inside. Professional Plastics requests that indoor installation be allowed based on item 7 of section 8.2.2.5.1.4 of NFPA 664. The following paragraphs detail the technical justification for this request. The International Codes recognize altemative means of compliance. In this case compliance with NFPA 664 would be the proposed altemative means. NFPA 664 section 8.2.2.5.1.4, item 7 allows for indoor installation of enclosureless dust collectors meeting 7 criteria, (a) through (g). The Belfab DW unit proposed by Professional Plastics is an enclosureless dust collector. Each of the 7 criteria are addressed below. (a) The collector is used only for dust pickup from wood processing machinery (Le., no metal grinders and so forth). In this case two saws are proposed, each used to cut plastic sheets. Professional Plastics had a sample of the dust created during cutting tested by Fike Corporation to determine its combustibility. The IFC, section 1302.1 defines combustible dust as a finely divided material 420 microns or Tess in diameter that will pass through a U.S. No. 40 standard sieve. The testing showed that 75.9% of the dust actually exceeded the 420 micron size and therefore would not be defined by the IFC as a combustible dust. For the purpose of testing the plastic dust sample's explosion parameters, the sample was sifted and only the portion 420 microns or less in diameter was used. The deflagration index (KsT) was determined for the sample. The deflagration index is a relative value used to compare and quantify the deflagration hazard of various combustible dusts. In this case a KsT = 95 was determined. This KsT is similar to and somewhat lower than common wood dust, so the hazard can be considered similar. At a KST of 95 this dust would be considered Class ST1 with a "weak" explosion October 10, 2011 Professional Plastics The FPI Consortium, Inc. 2 11 -5003 Fire Protection International Consortium, Inc. characteristic. Class 1 applies for KST greater than zero up to 200. Based on the KST, Professional Plastics requests that their plastic processing machinery be allowed under this item. A copy of the dust analysis performed by Fike is included as an attachment to this report. (b) The collector is not used on sanders or abrasive planers having mechanical material feeds. The collector is not used on sanders or abrasive planers. (c) Each collector has a maximum air - handling capacity of 2.4 m3 /sec (5000 cfm). The collector has a capacity of 5000 cfm. (d) The fan motor is of a totally enclosed, fan - cooled design. The 15HP, 5000cfm fan provided by Belfab with the unit is a totally enclosed, fan cooled design as noted in their product literature. (e) The collected dust is removed daily or more frequently if necessary to ensure efficient operation. Professional Plastic staff will make daily removal part of their standard procedures. (t) The collector is located at least 6.1 m (20ft) from any means of egress or area routinely occupied by personnel. The collector will be located a minimum of 20ft from any means of egress. Professional Plastics staff will mark a 20ft area around the collector as a safety zone where personnel will not be allowed other than for dust removal and collector service. (g) Multiple collectors in the same room are separated from each other by at least 6.1 m (20 ft). There is only one collector proposed. Two addition areas of clarification were requested by the City of Tukwila during the review of this dust collector proposal. 1) The IMC requires exhaust to be filtered prior to being recirculated into the building. Although the dust collector manufacturer's literature states that the bag filters are 99.8% efficient to a particle size of 0.3 microns, they have not provided test data to support their statement. Referring back to the explosibility test data for the dust, the sieve analysis revealed that the smallest particle size was 75 microns and that a full 90% of the dust was 106 microns or larger. Given the manufacturers stated filter bag efficiency at 0.3 microns it seems reasonable to have much higher efficiency at the larger particle sizes October 10, 2011 Professional Plastics The FPI Consortium, Inc. 3 11 -5003 Fire Protection International Consortium, Inc. easily satisfying the requirement. Additionally, Professional Plastics acknowledges their understanding that if upon future inspections it is found that the equipment is not properly collecting dust they will need to correct the situation. Please see the attached letter from Professional Plastics. The enclosureless dust collector style selected by Professional Plastics is typically in use to address the need for smaller dust collection systems to be installed indoors. As the equipment is designed and built specifically to comply with the indoor installation exceptions to the standards it seems reasonable to allow that use in this case. Further support for this is found in the 2012 edition of NFPA 664 which states that 'Air from enclosureless dust collectors meeting the requirements of 8.2.2.5.1.4(7) shall be permitted to be exhausted into the building." Compliance with Section 8.2.2.5.1.4(7) is discussed in detail above. 2) The City requested that the issue of deflagration hazard be specifically addressed. When Professional Plastics had a sample of the particulate waste produced during cutting tested it was found that only 24.1% of the sample was small enough (less than 420 microns) to be defined as combustible dust under the IFC. When a sample of the sub - 420 micron dust was tested it was found to be combustible and present a deflagration risk similar to wood dust. To address the need for deflagration venting an enclosureless duct collector is proposed. Based on the enclosureless design the confined space found in enclosed dust collecting equipment is not present, the equipment is essentially self - venting, so NFPA 664 does not require additional venting measures (Section 8.2.2.5.3). Based on the rationale above Professional Plastics will, with the City's approval, move forward with necessary revisions to their permit application for installation of their dust collector inside their facility. Please contact me at your convenience with any questions or concems related to this issue. Respectfully, FIRE PROTECTION INTERNATIONAL CONSORTIUM, INC. Carl P. Anderson, PE October 10, 2011 Professional Plastics The FPI Consortium, Inc. 4 11 -5003 Fike www.fike.com FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP ISO 9001 CERTIFIED 704 South 10th Street • P.O. Box 610 • Blue Springs, Missouri 64015 U.S.A. • (816) 229 -3405 • (816) 229 -0314 FPS Sales FAX August 17, 2011 Professional Plastics Dave Whaley 6233 Segale Park Drive D Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Dave Whaley, -41FILE Car> PY Perm* Imo, Enclosed are the results from the requested combustion test of dust sample Plastic Dust. The sample was submitted for testing on Professional Plastics Purchase Order Number 18942. Should there be any questions regarding the test procedure or Fike report number 11142949EXP, please do not hesitate to contact us. For inquiries regarding scheduling or pricing of additional testing, please contact Fike Customer Service at 1- 800 - 979 -3453. For information regarding application of this informatio your regional Fike distributor. Forgy Process Insturments Incorporated Randy Forgy 1879 Craig Road St. Louis, MO 63146 314- 439 -9149 APPROVED NOV 2 1 2011 City of Tukwila BUILDING DIVISION se contact For technical inquiries regarding procedures followed during the generation of the data presented within this report, please feel free to contact me directly. Stuart Johnson Supervisor, Combustion Testing Services Fike Corporation 704 South 10th Street Blue Springs, MO 64015 816 - 655 -4768 (Direct) 816- 229 -6423 (Laboratory FAX) Stuart.Johnson @Fike.com Fike Corporation and its agents hold information contained is this report confidential. No information contained in this report will O (;)144p E TE with third parties without prior written consent. RECEI\/� Page 1 of 19 CITYOFTU LA LTR #, nr.T 1 t 2011 fj\I\�I PERMtTCENTER FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP like® REPORT ON DUST EXPLOSIBILITY TESTING OF PLASTIC DUST FOR PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS TUKWILA, WA 98188 PREPARED BY: MR. ADAM MORRISON APPROVED BY: MR STUART JOHNSON FIKE CORPORATION BLUE SPRINGS, MO AUGUST 17, 2011 Fike Corporation and it's agents hold information contained is this report confidential. No information contained in this report will be shared with third parties without prior written consent. Page 2 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The explosive behavior of Plastic Dust was determined in a 20 liter spherical vessel. Tests were conducted according to the ASTM Standard E1226, "Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds" [3]. On the basis of the tests conducted, Plastic Dust has the following explosion parameters. Pmax = 6.28 barg Pmax Corrected = 6.41 barg (dp /dt)max = 350 bar /s KSt = 95 bar m/s E.S. = 0.8 To compensate for cooling effects from the walls of the 20 liter, a mathematical correction (Pmax Corrected) is performed on the measured Pmax if the Pmax is greater than 5.50 bar. The equation for the correction is taken from the Appendices of ASTM E1226 "Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds " [3] and is shown below. Pmax Corrected = 0.775 Pmax" 5 Electrical equipment suitable for Class II locations as per the National Materials Advisory Board 353 -3- 80, Classification of Combustible Dust in Accordance with the National Electrical Code and Subpart S of 29 CFR 1910 [1] is required when certain material properties exist. An Explosion Severity (E.S.) of> 0.5 or an Ignition Sensitivity (I.S.) >_ 0.2 require the use of this equipment. Explosion severity (E.S.) is a relative comparison of a dusts combustible properties vs. those of Pittsburgh Coal. Ignition Sensitivity (I.S.) requires the knowledge of a materials ignitibility properties; Minimum Explosible Concentration (MEC), Minimum Ignition Temperature of a Dust Cloud (MAIT) and Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE). The I.S. value is the ratio of the product of these values to those obtained using Pittsburgh Coal. Since this report deals strictly with the explosibility indices of the test sample, the calculation of I.S. falls outside the scope of this report. Since a positive result from either the E.S. criteria or the I.S. can signify the requirement for Class II location equipment, this report can only identify if a positive result from the E.S. criteria was met. If the E.S. is < 0.5, additional testing would be required to rule out the possibility of a positive result, based on the I.S. criteria. The formula used for the calculation of E.S. is shown below. E.S. _ (P1 x K1) / (P2 x K2) Where: P 1 = Pmax of test sample K1 = Kst of test sample P2 = Pmax of Pittsburgh Coal K2 = Kst of Pittsburgh Coal Values used for Pittsburgh Coal are taken from most recent vessel calibration using Pittsburgh Coal. It is known that moisture contents in excess of 5% by weight can influence the explosive behavior of dusts; Section 9.4, ASTME1226 "Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds "[3]. Moisture content testing was performed using an Ohaus MB45 Moisture Analyzer on Plastic Dust prior to testing in the 20 liter vessel. Based on this testing, the moisture content "as received and tested" was 1.64 % by weight. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 3 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP INTRODUCTION The explosive behavior of dusts is described in terms of the maximum explosion pressure and the maximum rate of explosion pressure rise. The availability of these values allows the proper design of protection systems against accidental explosions. For example, the design of explosion vents, as described by NFPA 68 [2] requires knowledge of KSt, the normalized rate of rise of explosion pressure. KSt can be determined by conducting a series of dust explosion tests in a 20 liter explosion chamber and measuring the pressure and rate of pressure rise during each test. A standard test method for the measurement of pressure and rate of pressure rise for combustible dusts has been established by the ASTM Committee E -27 on the Hazard Potential of Chemicals [2]. This method has been used to determine the explosive behavior of the dust sample identified as Plastic Dust. The testing was conducted for Professional Plastics and the results are presented in this report. The maximum explosion pressure, the maximum rate of explosion pressure rise and KSt have been calculated. BACKGROUND The potential severity of a dust explosion is quantified by measurement of the pressure and rate of pressure rise due to the explosion. These measured parameters are a function of: A. physical and chemical properties of the dust (particle size distribution and chemical composition); B. concentration of dust in the dust/air mixture; C. homogeneity and turbulence of the dust/air mixture; D. type, energy and location of the ignition source; E. geometry of the vessel in which the explosion is occurring; F. initial pressure and temperature of the dust/air mixture [3]. Therefore, it is important to use a standard laboratory test method to measure these explosion parameters. A typical pressure time curve from a dust explosion in a 20 liter chamber is shown in Figure 1. Pex is the maximum pressure observed during the course of the explosion. Similarly, (dp /dt)ex is the maximum rate of pressure rise during the explosion. As noted above Pex and (dp /dt)ex vary as a function of several parameters. In the standard test method used, the homogeneity and turbulence, the type energy and location of the ignition source, vessel geometry and initial conditions are kept constant. The effect of varying concentration on Pex and (dp /dt)ex is then observed for a given dust. A series of tests are conducted over a large range of concentrations and Pmax, the maximum explosion pressure, and (dp /dt)max, the maximum rate of pressure rise are determined from the series of tests. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 4 of 19 Pressure (bara) 10 6 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP 4= 0 • Pex P Ld T Pressure at- gnition (PtPiiun,a) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Time (seconds) 0.20 0.25 Figure 1: Pressure vs. Time from Dust Explosion in 20 Liter chamber 0.30 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 5 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP An additional explosion parameter, KSt can also be determined from having conducted a series of tests. As shown below, KSt is the maximum rate of rise normalized to a 1 m3 volume; Section 3.1.5, ASTM E1226 "Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds" [3]. Where P - Pressure, bar t - time, seconds v - volume, m3 KSt - bar.m/s KSt = (dp /dt)max V 1/3 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 6 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP EXPERIMENTAL The apparatus used to measure the dust explosion parameters in compliance with ASTM El 226 [3] is shown in Figure 2. The explosion chamber used was a 20 liter sphere containing a dispersion nozzle. The dispersion nozzle was connected to a sample loading cylinder and a 0.6 liter air discharge vessel. During an experiment, dust was placed in the loading cylinder and the air discharge vessel was pressurized to 290 psig. The dust was dispersed through the holes in the dispersion nozzle into a partially evacuated explosion chamber by activating the ball valve in between the discharge vessel and the sample cylinder. The resulting dust cloud was ignited with one 5 kJ chemical igniter placed at the end of the ignition leads. The ignition source was located at the center of the spherical explosion chamber. Two pressure transducers were used to observe the pressure history of the explosion. The pressure data was amplified and stored in a mini computer. The mini computer was also used to conduct the experiment and control operation of the ball valve and ignition of the dust cloud. During each test, the length of time between the beginning of dust dispersion and ignition of the cloud was kept constant at 72ms. A vacuum line was attached to the explosion chamber (along with a vacuum gauge) in order to obtain a pre -test vacuum level of 5.50 psia in the chamber. At the time of ignition, the dust cloud was at room temperature (25° C) and a normal pressure of 1 bara. The pressure of the explosion chamber at ignition was kept constant from test to test by keeping the air discharge pressure and the pre -test vacuum level constant from test to test. The homogeneity and turbulence of the dust/air mixture in the explosion chamber were essentially invariant from test to test because the same dispersion pressure differential was used and the same ignition time was used. A filtered exhaust was attached to the chamber to allow safe post - explosion cleanup of the chamber. The general procedure for the experiments is shown below: A. Dust was sifted to < 425um (40 mesh). B. A weighed amount of dust was placed in the loading cylinder. C. One 5kJ chemical igniter was placed at the center of the chamber. D. The chamber was sealed. E. The chamber was evacuated to 5.50 psia. F. The air discharge vessel was pressurized to 290 psig. The partial evacuation in combination with air discharge vessel pressurization allows the explosion chamber to reach a pressure of 1 bara prior to ignition of the dust cloud. G. The timing circuit was activated by the operating software. H. Data acquisition was completed. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 7 of 19 Control 00 Panel O 0- Ignitor Leads Regulated Supply Gauge Filtered Exhaust Pressure Transducer Charge Level Pressure Gauge 0. MD FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Rupture Disc / Filtered Exhaust Chem ical '' Ignitor 20 Liter Explosion Chamber Rebound Nozzle Discharge Vessel Sample Loading Cylinder 1 Vacuum Gauge Figure 2: Apparatus for measuring dust explosion parameters (EXP) Pressure Transducer Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 8 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP I. The chamber was vented through the filtered exhaust and flushed with air. The chamber was opened and cleaned prior to the next test. Tests were conducted at concentrations of 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 and 3000 g/m3 (Series 1) to determine the concentrations at which the maximum values of PeX and (dp/dt)ex would be obtained. Two additional series of tests (Series 2, Series 3) were conducted at the concentration where the maximums were found and at one concentration on each side of the maximums. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 9 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP RESULTS The results from the series of tests are presented in Table 1 and Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. Table 1 contains the Pex and (Kst)ex for each test as measured with pressure Transducer No. 1 and 2. Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6 show the Pex, (Kst)ex as a function of dust concentration. Figures 3 and 4 are for Transducer No. 1 and Figures 5 and 6 are for Transducer No. 2. As shown in the table, Pmax is an average of the largest explosion pressures observed from each of the three test series. The (Kst)max is also an average of the largest observed rates from each series. The measured Pmax from Transducer No. 1 was 6.29 barg and the measured Pmax from Transducer No. 2 was 6.28 barg. The average Pmax value is 6.28 barg. The average corrected Pmax value is 6.41 barg. The (Kst)max from Transducer No. 1 was 96 bar m/s and the (Kst)max from Transducer No. 2 was 95 bar m/s. The average (Kst)max is 95 bar m/sec. The explosion severity (E.S.) is 0.8. Based on the results of these tests, Plastic Dust must be regarded as providing a dust explosion hazard. A sieve analysis was performed on the "as received" sample. The results of this analysis are shown in Appendix A. It is known that moisture contents in excess of 5% by weight can influence the explosive behavior of dusts; Section 9.4, ASTM E1226 "Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds "[3]. Moisture content testing was performed using an Ohaus MB45 Moisture Analyzer on Plastic Dust prior to testing in the 20 liter vessel. Based on this testing, the moisture content "as received and tested" was 1.64 % by weight. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 10 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Table 1: Summary of Explosibility Data From 20 Liter Apparatus Customer Name Professional Plastics Sample Name Plastic Dust Material Prep. sifted to < 425um (40 mesh) Explosibility Parameters from Transducer 1 Explosibility Parameters from Transducer 2 Pax Channel 0 Kst Channel 0 Conc. s (g /m) Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Average Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Average 1000 6.26 6.29 Pmax 6.26 54 6.36 83 54 1500 6.08 6.23 6.37 6.23 58 81 99 79 2000 6.01 6.08 5.72 5.94 83 105 78 89 2500 5.45 5.49 5.24 5.39 72 84 90 82 3000 5.20 5.20 46 46 Explosibility Parameters from Transducer 2 Maximum Values from Transducer 1 Pe% Channel 1 Kst Channel 1 Conc. a (g /m) Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Average Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Average 1000 6.25 6.29 Pmax 6.25 53 6.36 83 53 1500 6.07 6.22 6.36 6.22 58 81 98 79 2000 5.99 6.07 5.71 5.92 82 105 78 88 2500 5.44 5.48 5.23 5.38 73 85 90 83 3000 5.18 5.18 46 46 Maximum Values from Transducer 1 Maximum Values from Transducer 2 Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Average Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Average 6.28 6.26 6.23 6.37 6.29 Pmax 6.25 6.22 6.36 83 105 99 96 Kst 82 105 98 95 Reported Explosibility Parameters Pmax (bar) 6.28 Pmax Corrected (bar) 6.41 Kst (bar.m /sec) 95 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 11 of 19 7 6 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Plastic Dust 5- 2 1 0 750 3 4- A A -4— #— -4-- 1- I 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 Concentration (g /m3) Figure 3: PeX Data from Transducer 1 2500 2750 3000 3250 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 12 of 19 KK91 (bar m /sec) 150 135 120 - 105 90 - 75 60 - 45 - 30 - 15 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Plastic Dust 0 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 Concentration (g /m3) Figure 4: Kst Data from Transducer 1 2500 2750 3000 3250 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials prov ided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 13 of 19 PIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Plastic Dust 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 Concentration (g /m3) Figure 5: Pex Data from Transducer 2 2500 2750 3000 3250 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 14 of 19 Ka (bar m /sec) 150 135 120 - 105 - 90 75 60 45 30 - 15- 0 750 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Plastic Dust 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 Concentration (g /m3) Figure 6: Kst Data from Transducer 2 2500 2750 3000 3250 Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 15 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP CALIBRATION Calibration of the 20 liter test chamber is performed quarterly using standard reference materials. The P,,,ax and Kst results of the tests are compared to historical data to ensure proper vessel operation. The current standard reference materials are Lycopodium Clavatum, Pittsburgh Pulverized Coal (PPC) and Cornstarch. The explosion characteristics of these materials are documented in ASTM E1226 (Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds) or determined in Fike's 1 m3 vessel. Table 2 shows the standard characteristics of the reference material. Table 2: Explosion Characteristics Material Pmax Allowable Deviation Kst Allowable Deviation Data Reference Lycopodium Clavatum 7.0 +/- 10% 151 +/- 20% ASTM E1226 Pittsburgh Pulverized Coal 7.0 +/- 10% 117 +/- 20% ASTM E1226 Cornstarch 8.3 +/- 10% 215 +/- 20% Fike 1m3 Lycopodium Clavatum has a narrow particle size distribution with a mean diameter of 28um. No particle size reduction is performed. Due to a short supply of Lycopodium Clavatum, the use of this material is limited to initial vessel commissioning. Pittsburgh Pulverized Coal (PPC) has a wider particle size distribution. Therefore, sieving is performed on the coal sample to produce a particle size of sub- 150um. Both materials are kept in a desicator for 24hrs prior to testing. Pmax and Kst are affected by many variables. Those variables that are associated with the test vessel are the pressure at ignition and the amount of turbulence present at the time of ignition. The pressure at ignition is controlled by the initial chamber evacuation and the charge pressure of the 0.6 liter discharge vessel. These pressures are set to allow the pressure at ignition to be 1 bara while incorporating a 20 bar discharge pressure in the 0.6 liter vessel. The amount of turbulence present at the time of ignition is controlled using the ignition delay. The ignition delay is set to allow a calibrated time difference between the opening of the dust injection valve and the firing of the chemical ignitor. The pressure data collected during each test is examined to ensure these parameters are within acceptable limits. Table 3 presents the results of the vessel commissioning testing using Lycopodium Clavatum in Fike's 20 liter vessel #2. Table 3: Lycopodium Clavatum Calibration Data for Vessel #2 Date Material Pmax Corrected (bar) Kst (bar m/sec) Acceptable Results (yes /no) Corrective Action 01/14/09 Lycopodium Clavatum 6.48 128 yes N/A Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 16 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP Table 4 presents the results of the most recent vessel calibrations using Pittsburgh Pulverized Coal in vessel #2. Table 4: Pittsburgh Pulverized Coal Calibration Data for Vessel #2 Date Material Pmax Corrected (bar) Kst (bar m/sec) Acceptable Results (yes /no) Corrective Action 04/01/11 PPC 6.53 113 Yes N/A 07/06/10 PPC 6.52 105 Yes N/A 6/23/2010 PPC 6.52 105 Yes N/A Table 5 presents the results of the most recent vessel calibrations using Cornstarch in vessel #2. Table 5: Cornstarch Calibration Data for Vessel #2 Date Material Pmax Corrected (bar) Km (bar m/sec) Acceptable Results (yes /no) Corrective Action 01/19/09 Cornstarch 7.51 245 Yes N/A All instrumentation used in the collection of this data is traceable to NIST standards. Calibration records for these instruments are maintained in Fike's Quality Assurance Department. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 17 of 19 PIKE REPORT NO. 11142949E30 Appendix A: Sieve Analysis Report Customer Name: [Professional Plastics Sample Name: [Plastic Dust WO #: 111142949 Sample Used (g): 160.6 , � 1r r" Y� 6 " Particle ASiielRange t :-r. � ,r +,4" : ii0 2esults , `4 ' 4 High of Range Low of Range In Range Below (Low of Range) Particle Size Mesh Particle Size Mesh (um) (No.) (um) (No.) ( %) ( %) 600 30 61.9% 38.1% 600 30 425 40 14.0% 24.1% 425 40 300 50 6.6% 17.5% 300 50 212 70 3.0% 14.5% 212 70 150 100 2.3% 12.2% 150 100 106 140 2.3% 9.9% 106 140 75 200 4.5% 5.4% 75 200 5.4% Particle Size Distribution 100% 100% 90% - 80% - 70% - 60% - & 50 %- c to rt 40% c 30% - 20% 10% 0% .. - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - -- --- - ...... ..- ------ -•- -90% - 80% -70% - 60% 0 -50% ; 0 - 40% cp - 30% - 20% -10% 0% ....... 1 1 , , 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Particle Size (um) > 600um < 600um, > 425um < 425um, > 300um < 300um, > 212um < 212um, > 150um < 150um, > 106um < 106um, > 75um < 75um — - — - % Below Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 18 of 19 FIKE REPORT NO. 11142949EXP REFERENCES [1] National Materials Advisory Board 353 -3 -80, Classification of Combustible Dust in Accordance with the National Electrical Code and Subpart S of 29 CFR 1910. [2] NFPA 68 "Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting ", National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, 2007. [3] "Standard Test Method for Explosibility of Dust Clouds ", ASTM Standard El 226. [4] ISO 6184/1 "Explosion Protection System - Part 1: Determination of Explosion Indices of Combustible Dusts in Air ", International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland, 1985. Disclaimers: This report documents test data obtained by application of test procedures, described or referenced herein, to materials provided to Fike Corporation by the customer. These test results reflect the responses of the test materials when tested as described. Changes in material properties including composition, particle size, moisture content and morphology can be expected to affect the results. Page 19 of 19 PRWE4:IONAL PLASTICS, INC. 6233 Segale Park Drive D — Tukwila, WA 98188 Toll Free: (800) 223 -8360 — Phone: (253) 872 -7430 — Fax: (253) 872 -7704 Visit our website: www.professionalplastics.com Dave Larson Allen Johannessen c /o: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Dear Sir; Professional Plastics submitted Mechanical Permit Application M11 -095 and was declined based on several NFPA and Fire Prevention concerns. After several conversations, meetings and helpful suggestions, we have had our material tested by a professional explosion test lab, we have gathered mechanical specifications on our collection unit and have hired a fire protection engineer to help us professionally meet the expectations of the City of Tukwila. We would like to also provide you with our maintenance plan which will further alleviate any question as to the effectiveness of our operations within the facility. Our daily procedure is to empty any and all containers containing gathered particulate from the dust collection unit. The unit itself is inspected and cleaned on a weekly basis to avoid any debris build up at which time the area around the unit is also cleaned. This procedure has been in place since the unit was first installed in our previous Kent location and successfully remained in place for the five plus years of operation with little to no problems. We acknowledge that at some future time if for some reason our dust collection unit is found to be unacceptable based on efficiency per the City of Tukwila's recommendation; we would be willing to continue to work on meeting said requirements such as relocation and or system replacement. Respectfully David Whaley �1�= ,'ZC%L' Professional Plastics Quality Control Warehouse Operations tI1J ncEN5UMI_A i41 1 TQi i PERMIT CENTER INCOMPLETE MI I Olc LTR# 1 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director October 27, 2011 David Whaley 6233 Segale Park Dr D Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Correction Letter #1 Mechanical Permit Application Number M11 -095 Professional Plastics — 6233 Segale Park Dr D Dear Mr. Whaley, This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your mechanical permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Building and Fire Departments. Building Department: Dave Larson at 206 431 -3678 if you have any questions regarding the attached memo. Fire Department: At Metzler at 206 971 -8718 if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that two (2) sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, Bill Rambo Permit Technician encl File: M11 -095 W:\Permit Center \Correction Letters\2011\M11 -095 Correction Letter #1.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Tukwila Building Division Dave Larson, Senior Plan Examiner Building Division Review Memo Date: October 25, 2011 Project Name: Professional Plastics Permit #: M11 -095 Plan Review: Dave Larson, Senior Plans Examiner The Building Division conducted a plan review on the subject permit application. Please address the following comments in an itemized format with revised plans, specifications and/or other applicable documentation. 1. The required 20 ft. clear space around the dust collector should be shown on the main plan sheet #1. Rack storage units should not be located in this space as well as work stations of any sort. There should not be a main emergency lighted egress path in this space. 2. Per our phone conversation, revise the plan to show exhaust duct sizes if 14 inch duct will not be used. Please include the duct thickness or gauge 3. Please include equipment anchorage details and duct support and lateral bracing details (GENERAL NOTE) PLAN SUBMITTALS: (Min. size 11x17 to maximum size of 24x36; all sheets shall be the same size). (If applicable) Structural Drawings and structural calculations sheets shall be original signed wet stamped, not copied.) Should there be questions concerning the above requirements, contact the Building Division at 206 -431- 3670. No further comments at this time. • Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau AI Metzler, Fire Project Coordinator Fire Prevention Bureau Review Memo Date: October 26, 2011 Project Name: Professional Plastics Address: 6233 Segale Park Drive D Permit #: M11 -095 Plan Reviewer: Al Metzler, Fire Project Coordinator The Fire Prevention Bureau conducted a plan review on the subject permit application. Please address the following comments in an itemized format with revised plans, specifications and/or other applicable documentation. 1. Ducts 10 inches or larger in diameter which convey combustible materials must be sprinklered. Should there be questions concerning the above requirements, contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at 206- 971 -8718. No further comments at this time. r city of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director David Whaley Professional Plastics 6233 Segale Park Dr D Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Incomplete Letter #1 Mechanical Permit Application M11 -095 Professional Plastics — 6233 Segale Park Dr D Dear Mr. Whaley, 07/22/11 This letter is to inform you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on July 12, 2011 is determined to be incomplete. Before your application can continue the plan review process the attached/following items from the following department(s) need(s) to be addressed: Building Department: Allen Johannessen at 204 - 433 -7163 if you have questions concerning the attached comments. Fire Department: Alan Metzler at 206 971 -8718 if you have questions concerning the attached comments. Please address the comment above in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that two (2) sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Permit Center at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, er Ma shall t Technician Enclosures File: MI1 -067 W:\Permit Center \Incomplete Letters \2011\M 11 -095 Incomplete Ltr 41 (rev).doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Tukwila Building Division Allen Johannessen, Plan Examiner Determination of Completeness Memo Date: July 14, 2011 Project Name: Professional Plastics Permit #: M11 -095 Plan Review: Allen Johannessen, Plans Examiner The Building Division has deemed the subject permit application incomplete. To assist the applicant in expediting the Department plan review process, please forward the following comments. (GENERAL NOTE) PLAN SUBMITTALS: (Min. size 11x17 to maximum size of 24x36; all sheets shall be the same size). (If applicable) Structural Drawings and structural calculations sheets shall be original signed wet stamped, not copied.) 1. The proposed location of the dust collector does not conform to all the listed NFPA 664 regulation. Example: Per item (# 1) Outside of buildings, ( #2) Indoors shall have no fire or deflagration hazards, ( #7 "meeting all the requirements a thru g" specifically #7 -a) "The collector is used only for dust pick from wood processing machinery (i.e., no metal grinders and so forth.), the material to be cut is plastic or similar and other than wood. The 2009 IMC specifically states in section 1101.2 "Factory -built equipment and appliances. Listed and labeled self - contained, factory-built equipment and appliances shall be tested in accordance with UL 207, 412, 471 or 1995. Such equipment and appliances are deemed to meet the design, manufacture and factory test requirements of this code if installed in accordance with their listing and the manufacturer's installation instructions. IMC 511.1 Dust, stock and refuse conveying systems. Dust, stock and refuse conveying systems shall comply with the provisions of Section 510 and Sections 511.1.1 through 511.2. IMC 511.1.1 Collectors and Separators. Collectors and separators involving such systems as centrifugal separators, bag filter systems and similar devices, and associated supports shall be constructed of noncombustible materials and shall be located on the exterior of the building or structure. A collector or separator shall not be located nearer than 10 feet to combustible construction or to an unprotected wall or floor opening, unless the collector is provided with a metal vent pipe that extends above the highest part of any roof with a distance of 30 feet IMC 511.1.2 Discharge pipe. Discharge piping shall conform to the requirements for ducts, including clearances... The installation of the duct collection system shall be located outside and meet the intent of the code. 2. The size of the duct is shown to be reduced to 10 inches from 14 inches. Fan specifications require 14 inches. Any alterations to these requirements shall require an engineer. (IMC 1101.2) Should there be questions concerning the above requirements, contact the Building Division at 206 -431- 3670. No further comments at this time. 4 Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau Al Metzler, Fire Project Coordinator Fire Prevention Bureau Review Memo Date: July 19, 2011 Project Name: Professional Plastics Address: 6233 Segale Park Drive D Permit #: MI 1 -095 Plan Reviewer: Al Metzler, Fire Project Coordinator The Fire Prevention Bureau conducted a plan review on the subject permit application. Please address the following comments in an itemized format with revised plans, specifications and/or other applicable documentation. 1. Ducts conveying flammable /combustible materials where the largest cross - sectional diameter of the duct is 10 inches or greater shall be protected with an approved automatic fire suppression system. 2. Per the International Mechanical Code and NFPA 664, the dust collector shall be located outside of the building. Should there be questions concerning the above requirements, contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at 206- 971 -8718. No further comments at this time. July 14, 2011 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director David Whaley Professional Plastics 6233 Segale Park Dr D Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Incomplete Letter #1 Mechanical Permit Application M11 -095 Professional Plastics — 6233 Segale Park Dr D Dear Mr. Whaley, This letter is to inform you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on July 12, 2011 is determined to be incomplete. Before your application can continue the plan review process the attached /following items from the following department(s) need(s) to be addressed: Building Department: Allen Johannessen at 204 - 433 -7163 if you have any questions concerning the attached comments. Please address the comment above in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that two (2) sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Permit Center at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, Bill Rambo Permit Technician Enclosures File: MI1 -067 W :\Permit Center\Incomplete Letters \2011 \M 11 -095 Incomplete Ltr # 1.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Tukwila Building Division Allen Johannessen, Plan Examiner Determination of Completeness Memo Date: July 14, 2011 Project Name: Professional Plastics Permit #: M11 -095 Plan Review: Allen Johannessen, Plans Examiner The Building Division has deemed the subject permit application incomplete. To assist the applicant in expediting the Department plan review process, please forward the following comments. (GENERAL NOTE) PLAN SUBMITTALS: (Min. size 11x17 to maximum size of 24x36; all sheets shall be the same size). (If applicable) Structural Drawings and structural calculations sheets shall be original signed wet stamped, not copied.) 1. The proposed location of the dust collector does not conform to all the listed NFPA 664 regulation. Example: Per item ( #1) Outside of buildings, ( #2) Indoors shall have no fire or deflagration hazards, ( #7 "meeting all the requirements a thru g" specifically #7 -a) "The collector is used only for dust pick from wood processing machinery (i.e., no metal grinders and so forth.), the material to be cut is plastic or similar and other than wood. The 2009 IMC specifically states in section 1101.2 "Factory -built equipment and appliances. Listed and labeled self - contained, factory-built equipment and appliances shall be tested in accordance with UL 207, 412, 471 or 1995. Such equipment and appliances are deemed to meet the design, manufacture and factory test requirements of this code if installed in accordance with their listing and the manufacturer's installation instructions. IMC 511.1 Dust, stock and refuse conveying systems. Dust, stock and refuse conveying systems shall comply with the provisions of Section 510 and Sections 511.1.1 through 511.2. IMC 511.1.1 Collectors and Separators. Collectors and separators involving such systems as centrifugal separators, bag filter systems and similar devices, and associated supports shall be constructed of noncombustible materials and shall be located on the exterior of the building or structure. A collector or separator shall not be located nearer than 10 feet to combustible construction or to an unprotected wall or floor opening, unless the collector is provided with a metal vent pipe that extends above the highest part of any roof with a distance of 30 feet IMC 511.1.2 Discharge pipe. Discharge piping shall conform to the requirements for ducts, including clearances.. . The installation of the duct collection system shall be located outside and meet the intent of the code. 2. The size of the duct is shown to be reduced to 10 inches from 14 inches. Fan specifications require 14 inches. Any alterations to these requirements shall require an engineer. (IMC 1101.2) Should there be questions concerning the above requirements, contact the Building Division at 206 -431- 3670. No further comments at this time. • • M>":, t S 5 w4r Sort L4�'sl�kvr� E 2v'Y. PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: M11 -095 DATE: 11 -03 -11 PROJECT NAME: PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS SITE ADDRESS: 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D Original Plan Submittal X Response to Correction Letter # 1 Response to Incomplete Letter # Revision # After Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: 4-O- revention � � ,� king LJivisioioon 1 Planning Division Public Works Structural ❑ Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) DUE DATE: 11-08-11 Complete Comments: Incomplete Not Applicable Permit Center. Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route Nrj Structural Review Required 111 No further Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions xi DUE DATE: 12 -06-11 Not Approved (attach comments) n Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: Documents/routing slip.doc 2 -28 -02 HERMIT COORD COPS PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: M11 -095 PROJECT NAME: PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS DATE: 10/11/11 SITE ADDRESS: 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D Original Plan Submittal X Response to Incomplete Letter # 1 Response to Correction Letter # Revision # after Permit Issued DEPART ENT • uilding 'vision Public Works AVA kelA4 Fire Prevention Structural W-141 n Planning Division Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete 14 Incomplete DUE DATE: 10/13/11 Not Applicable Comments: Permit Center Use Only • INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES/THURS ROUTING: Please Route 14 Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: No further Review Required DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Approved with Conditions DUE DATE: 11 /10 /11 Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: • • Bldg Fire Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: 1,4 Documents /routing slip.doc 2 -28 -02 • • P T PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: M11 -095 DATE: 07 -12 -11 PROJECT NAME: PROFESSIONAL PLASTICS SITE ADDRESS: 6233 SEGALE PARK DR D X Original Plan Submittal Response to Correction Letter # Response to Incomplete Letter # Revision # After Permit Issued DEPAR MEN S: Building Division i4-11 Public Works ❑ of\ A Fire Prevention I Structural Planning Division ❑ Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Comments: n Incomplete DUE DATE: 07 -14 -11 Not Applicable Permit Center Use Only AAV INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: 1' 1 "i" LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg'- Fire Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES/THURS ROUTING: Please Route ❑ Structural Review Required n No further Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: DUE DATE: 08 -11 -11 Approved n Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: Documents/routing slip.doc 2 -28-02 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: II - 3- /I Plan Check/Permit Number: M11-095 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Professional Plastics Project Address: 6233 Segale Park Dr D Contact Person: ui & LA)tAztlfil Phone Number: 7 Z 74/30 Summary of Revision: /sJ V ✓,L f jeJ IGcn3 d t u7A V P 911-4 h% rev iSG `cici 4ti761yk, eaipie w f 4 31 46�GG lad )v 5f.0c.I)(c. ko,7.S RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWItA NOV 0 3 2011 PERMIT CENTER Sheet Number(s): 2 "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date o revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: Er—Entered in Permits Plus on \applications \forms- applications on Iine\revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us OCTh 112011 1 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: /0 ' 7 ' // Plan Check/Permit Number: M11-095 ® Response to Incomplete Letter # 1 ❑ Response to Correction Letter # ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Professional Plastics Project Address: 6233 Segale Park Dr D Contact Person: .0( SL up Loiky Summary of Revision: / o .... • Phone Number: 25Z 7 L 71430 Ai rQ I 1roce<SS D CoYv eJ%vJ ALL L C_A-Li A� Okwike.s ✓� et.k Fare. yo.A- tn„L.,1:4- i5 Ow al Wubfit.✓.S e)cl COsevtP‘ticu c_1 re! ue.S.- o. QC Fl oz& �Y04�SS)0nal ?k.GtSk----S )o��� v,A4c21 (Aunt_ 110 osal cnv.& of refe.v� us} in ar■ per enQraAc.k Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including dat Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: Entered in Permits Plus on r(/ ` ( "1 1 r ision \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: Contractors or Tradespeople Per Friendly Page • General /Specialty Contractor A business registered as a construction contractor with L &I to perform construction work within the scope of its specialty. A General or Specialty construction Contractor must maintain a surety bond or assignment of account and carry general liability insurance. Business and Licensing Information Name ARGO BLOWER /MFG CO INC UBI No. 178003857 Phone 2067629336 Status Active Address 5400 E Marginal Way S License No. ARGOBM•242KC Suite /Apt. License Type Construction Contractor City Seattle Effective Date 5/3/1976 State WA Expiration Date 4/25/2012 Zip 981342411 Suspend Date County King Specialty 1 General Business Type Corporation Specialty 2 Unused Parent Company Business Owner Information Name Role Effective Date Expiration Date SCHUEHLE, ALLAN L Owner 05/03/1976 Bond Amount FRANK, KAREN ANN Owner 07/06/2010 SI3734 ODIE, MARY E Owner 07/06/2010 FRANK, RICHARD GORDON Owner 07/06/2010 TRAVELERS CAS & STY CO OF AMER SETERA, DAVID JR ALLEN Owner 07/09/2010 11/19/2009 Bond Information Page 1 of 1 Bond Bond Company Name Bond Account Number Effective Date Expiration Date Cancel Date Impaired Date Bond Amount Received Date 4 CBIC SI3734 07/17/2009 Until Cancelled $12,000.0001/26 /2010 3 TRAVELERS CAS & STY CO OF AMER SB0112 07/17/2005 Until Cancelled 11/19/2009 $12,000.0007/07 /2005 Assignment of Savings Information Savings Assignment of Savings Account Number Effective Date Release Date Assignment Type Impaired Date Amount Received Date 1 25240 46373 4/17/1978 Until Released Bond $6,000.00 Insurance Information Insurance Company Name Policy Number Effective Date Expiration Date Cancel Date Impaired Date Amount Received Date 23 Mid-Century lns 604726876 04/01/2009 04/01 /2012 $1,000,000.00 03/17/2011 22 AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE CO 01CH449686 04/01/2007 04/01/2010 06/17/2009 $1,000,000.00 03/19/2009 21 LIBERTY NORTHWEST INS CO C06163152 04/01/2007 04/01/2008 $1,000,000.00 03 /20/2007 20 LIBERTY NORTHWEST INS CO C05163152 04/01/2005 04/01 /2007 $1,000,000.0003 /06/2006 19 LIBERTY NORTHWEST INS CORP CPA000141203 04/01/2005 04/01 /2006 $1,000,000.00 03/28/2005 Summons /Complaint Information No unsatisfied complaints on file within prior 6 year period Warrant Information No unsatisfied warrants on file within prior 6 year period https: // fortress .wa.gov /lni/bbip /Print.aspx 11/29/2011