Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L08-038 - CITY OF TUKWILA - CODIGA PARK SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTCODIGA PARK SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT 12329-SOPLS L08-038 • Cizy of f 7'ilkwl%a2 Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Robert Eaton, Applicant City of Tukwila, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Washington State Attorney General Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Program Duwamish Indian Tribe Jim Haggerton, Mayor Jack Pace, Director May 5, 2009 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L08 -038 Applicant: Robert Eaton, City of Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department Type of Permit Applied for: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Project Description: Development of a 3 -acre park to include lawn areas and native landscaping, walkways, 10 parking spaces, an overlook deck, picnic shelter, and site furniture and amenities including picnic tables, a bike rack, benches, and garbage cans. Location: 50th Place South, Lots 37 -59 (Parcel #s 0179002950 and 0179002952) Associated Files: E01 -007 (SEPA/Environmental Review), LO1 -022 (previous Shoreline Substantial Development Permit), LO1 -023 (Special Permission — Parking), PRE01 -004 (Pre - Application Meeting) Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Low Density Residential (LDR) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS). Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit does comply with applicable City and state code JR Page 1 of 2 H:\Shoreline Permits \Codiga \Codiga_NOD Type 2 Shoreline.doc 05/04/2009 12:06:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. IIL YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS One administrative appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board of the Decision is permitted. Any person appealing to the Shorelines Hearings Board may raise certain SEPA issues as part of the appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appellants should consult the rules and procedures of the Shorelines Hearings Board for details. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING The requirements and procedures for appeals to the Shorelines Hearings Board are set forth in RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. V. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Jaimie Reavis, who may be contacted at 206 -431- 3659 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period unless an appeal is filed. fe Depfnent of Community Development City of Tukwila JR Page 2 of 2 05/04/2009 12:06:00 PM H: \Shoreline Permits\Codiga \Codiga NOD Type 2 Shoreline.doc City ofikukwila • Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L08 -038 Applied: 07/01/2008 Approved: 05/05/2009 Expiration: A permit is hereby granted to: TUKWILA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. to: SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR CODIGA FARM PARK - SEE L01 -022 .AND E01 -007 FOR FORMER FILES. SHORELINE RESTORATION COMPLETED UNDER LO 1 -022; PARK CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED AT THE TIME WAS NOT UNDERTAKEN AT THAT TIME. Upon the following property: Address: Parcel Number: 0179002950 Section/Township/Range: SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 23, R The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and any conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may only be appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within 21 -days from the filing of this permit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For more detail information on appeals, refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. Date: ace, Direc or o epartment of Community Development Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two (2) years from the effective date of the permit (the date the permit is filed with D.O.E.), per RCW 90.58.143(4). a cunoci @ICG I AO noo o. a a• nc nA 7nnn City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 To: Dave Radabaugh Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program Dept. of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160t Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008 -5452 Date of Transmittal: May 5, 2009 Date of Receipt: Type of Permit: Substantial Development Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Name: Robert Eaton, City of Tukwila Department of Parks and Recreation Address: 4414 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 Phone: (206) 267 -2350 Is the applicant the property owner? Yes - representative for the owner. Location of the property: SW 11 -23 -04 Lots 37 -59; (Parcel #s 0179002950 and 0179002952) Water Body Name: Duwamish River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Jack Pace, Director Description of Project: Development of a 3 -acre park to include lawn areas and native landscaping, walkways, 10 parking spaces, an overlook deck, picnic shelter, and site furniture and amenities including picnic tables, a bike rack, benches, and garbage cans. Notice of Application Date: November 14, 2008 Final Decision Date: May 5, 2009 By: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, City of Tukwila Phone Number: (206) 431 -3659 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 II eibi Dept. Of Community AFFIDAVIT 4 gamma w Development OF DISTRIBUTION I, , i ,�,. ,, i.� ✓, . ;,.1. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Name: co cef`q jt 91 zra p Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: Z 0 r —0 3 Determination of Non - Significance Mailing requested by: (TA I'm ti Re cui S Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's signature: a4,�,Lymyj Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application ,s, Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed /attached on this 5 day of 11A 414 in the year 20 a 9 Apo I ; cafrd cor s.�.4-,4 v;c, I'n ce lM Gv t' 1 (4 la i".1- E z37- - y Pawjcs `- RgCYYLJ?C, L Project Name: co cef`q jt 91 zra p -»1 t f Project Number: Z 0 r —0 3 Mailing requested by: (TA I'm ti Re cui S Mailer's signature: a4,�,Lymyj C: \TEMP\XPGRPWISEWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services t 4Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division ( ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA P4 Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation 54 KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services -SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div -SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev /Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val -Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr - Lakeridge Sewer /Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ,(>c) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources 4 Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ' Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green /Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin \Admin Forms \Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division - SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes - For any application on the Green /Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed /posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms \Agency Checklist • cry of Tukwila • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Pace, Director FM: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner RE: Shoreline Permit: L08 -038 Codiga Park Date: April 29, 2009 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves a request from the Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department for a shoreline substantial development permit to construct a neighborhood park within the 200 - foot buffer of the Duwamish River. The proposed park will include small open lawn areas edged with native landscaping, a picnic shelter with historical signage, picnic tables, benches, a porous concrete walkway, 10 parking spaces and associated drive aisle, a split rail fence at the top of a slope separating the park area from the side channel restoration project and restoration plantings, and an overlook deck that includes interpretive signage for the side channel habitat restoration project and for the Duwamish River. 2. BACKGROUND The City acquired this site with the intent to create a neighborhood park, to include a habitat restoration project, a non - motorized hand boat launch, and a pea -patch community garden. A SEPA decision, Shoreline Permit, and Special Permission Parking Decision were issued in 2001 for those park elements. The Shoreline Permit originally issued for the Codiga Park project was granted a 1 -year extension, and expired in May 2004. Since 2001, the scope of the Codiga Park project has changed to exclude the boat launch and community garden, as well as two of the 12 parking spaces included in the original park design. The boat launch was removed from the park design due to safety concerns that the area is too steep to include a boat launch facility. The exclusion of the community garden and two parking spaces from the park design occurred as a result of expansion of the side channel restoration area by the Army Corps of Engineers to cover a larger area of the park than originally planned. At its meeting on March 12, 2009, the Planning Commission decided to allow the number of required parking spaces at Codiga Park to be determined administratively by the Director of the Department of Community Development (DCD). On April 24, 2009, the DCD Director determined that the 10 parking spaces proposed with the current park design JR Page l of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 ;, • • will be sufficient to meet parking demand at the site, in light of the change to the park design which eliminated the community garden. The current proposal for Codiga Park is to have small areas of open space surrounded by native species landscaping. The park area will be located at least 50 feet landward from the ordinary high water mark of the Duwamish River. A steep slope separates the park area from areas waterward, serving a dual purpose of providing passive access to the shoreline area while at the same time keeping park visitors away from areas of the site more sensitive to disturbance, including areas with restoration plantings, the side channel habitat restoration area, and the river. A split rail fence will be constructed at the top of the slope to protect park visitors from the steep slope area leading down to areas waterward. Use of the park will be for passive recreation and will provide educational opportunities related to the site's historic and ecological significance. A walkway is proposed to run the length of the park, parallel to 50th Place S. This walkway will connect to an unpaved, informal path that provides access to the beach. Picnic tables are located along the walkway in the area adjacent to the parking lot, and benches are interspersed along the edge of the slope at the park's western edge to provide views of the restoration areas and the river. An overlook deck will be located approximately 55 feet from the ordinary high water mark, where visitors will be able to get a closer look at the side channel habitat restoration site and the Duwamish River (see attached Sheet L8, Shoreline Cross Section C -C). Signs containing information on the side channel restoration project, the Duwamish River, and local wildlife will be posted on the overlook deck. A picnic shelter structure will be located approximately 120 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the Duwamish River, and is designed to mimic the barn that was formerly located on the site until it was demolished to make way for the habitat restoration work done by the Army Corps of Engineers. A sign will be built adjacent to the picnic structure containing photographs and information about the historic Codiga Farm site and barn structure. Parking and driveway areas to serve the park are located inland, adjacent to 50th Place S. A drainage swale separates the parking lot and driveway from 50th Place S. Concrete for the walkway, and asphalt used for the parking area and driveway will be porous, and will drain into the swale. Staff has been approached by Stewardship Partners, a non -profit organization that helps private landowners restore and preserve natural Landscapes, to develop one of six demonstration rain gardens in King County within Codiga Park. The drainage swale separating the parking and driveway area from 50th Place South is proposed for development by Stewardship Partners as a demonstration rain garden site that will be installed as part of a series of rain garden design and construction workshops for homeowners, facility managers, landscapers, and the general public. Once installed, the rain garden would include signage to educate park visitors about the function and benefits of rain gardens. JR Page 2 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR,doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • 3. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The Shoreline Master Plan establishes three management zones adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Zone: An impact buffer area which provides for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. Low Impact Zone: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. High Impact Zone: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below along with a discussion of the proposed project. City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: The overall Goals of the City's SMP are set forth below, followed by a response related to the proposed project. 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Maintain a high quality of environment along the shorelines of Tukwila. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats, which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. Response: The project will advance the public interest by preserving an area of the shoreline for public access and educational opportunities. The new park will provide small areas of lawn JR Page 3 of 13 H: \Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • for passive recreation surrounded by native vegetation. Dense plantings, a split rail fence, and a slope down from the park area separate the park from the side channel restoration area and restoration plantings located waterward of the park site. The park area is proposed to provide visitors the opportunity to learn about the historic and ecological significance of the site, through (1) the design of the picnic shelter and historical signage which mimic the barn formerly located on the site, (2) an overlook deck which provides a unique public access opportunity to view the shoreline and the side channel restoration area, and (3) signage with information on the wildlife and ecological characteristics of the river and the side channel restoration area. Economic Development Element Goals: 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is enhanced. 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with shoreline goals and policies. Response: This project does not involve commercial or industrial development related to the shoreline. Overall economic benefits will accrue to the neighborhood through development of a neighborhood park, which will provide opportunities for passive recreation. The addition of native vegetation within the park will result in long -term benefits to the river and the shoreline management area. Public Access Element Goals: 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of Tukwila. 2. Assure that the intrusions created by public access will not endanger life, property or have adverse effects on fragile natural features. 3. Increase public access to publicly owned shorelines. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. Response: The goals of this section will be furthered through the construction of park facilities that provide opportunities for enjoyment of views and access to educational materials about the history of the site and the characteristics of the shoreline area. These facilities include an observation deck, a porous concrete walkway, picnic facilities, and benches. The parking area is located and designed in a way to minimize its impact within the shoreline management area. It is located inland from the rest of the park elements, will be screened from public right -of way along 50th Place South by new and existing trees, will JR Page 4 of 13 11:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • be constructed of porous asphalt, and will drain into a rain garden proposed between the parking area and 50th Place South. The proposed rain garden will help provide treatment for runoff from the parking lot and driveway area, and runoff from 50 Place South. Location of the parking area and driveway (with the exception of a few small areas that are within the Low Impact Environment) is almost entirely beyond 100 feet from the ordinary high water mark, within the High Impact Environment of the shoreline management area. Circulation Element Goals: The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads or public facilities within the shoreline. A parking lot and associated driveway, and porous concrete walkway will be provided for users of the park. An existing unpaved path can be used for closer access to the river and the beach area. Recreational Element Goals: 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. Response: Use of this site as a park that offers views and information on the river and side channel restoration area via walkway areas, picnic facilities, an overlook observation deck, and historical and interpretive signage will satisfy this goal of providing recreational opportunities that are unique to and dependent on the river. Shoreline Use Element Goals: 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Response: Development of this site as a passive park will enhance public access to the site and awareness of the site's historical and environmental significance. The addition of native plantings around the edges of the park will enhance vegetative cover and habitat within the shoreline area. New landscaping along the street front will provide screening for the parking and driveway areas. Conservation Element Goals: 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. JR Page 5 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the protection of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. Response: This site presented a unique opportunity to create a habitat restoration area where visitors could learn about the river and its ecosystem. The site is in the brackish to fresh water tidal area making it a prime area where juvenile salmon change their physiology from a freshwater to salt tolerant fish. Under work done as part of a previous project, the Army Corps of Engineers created a side channel habitat restoration area with the purpose of restoring tidal hydrology and thus providing rearing and feeding habitat for juvenile fish. The addition of a formal park at the top of a slope, separated from the restoration area by a split rail fence and native vegetation, will provide a designated space for visitors to observe wildlife and learn about the site's unique characteristics with minimal disturbance to the shoreline area. Benches, picnic tables, and an observation deck will provide areas where visitors can take advantage of views of the river and restoration work to protect and enhance the natural character of the shoreline area. Historic /Cultural Element Goals: 1. Protect or restore areas having historic, cultural, educational or scientific values. 2. The long -term effects upon the river must be considered over short-term benefits, economic or otherwise. Response: No archeologically significant items were found on the site. The park site was farmed from the early 1920's until recently, and had the last remaining barn in the City. When the side channel was designed, it was determined that the barn was located in an area where benefit to fish habitat could be maximized. Due to the barn's location in an area ideal for restoration of fish habitat, as well as its deteriorated condition, the barn was removed. Prior to removal, the barn was documented through photographs. The proposed picnic shelter and signage with historical information have been designed to mimic the peak, gable, and shape of the original barn. Construction of the historical sign is proposed as a project by an Eagle Scouts group. Additional signs related to wildlife, ecological functions of the river and side channel, and signage for the rain garden will add educational value to the park. 4. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. JR Page 6 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Low Density Residential (LDR). The park uses of the proposed project are a permitted use in the single family residential zone. The park will comply with the development standards of the LDR district. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 3, above is a discussion of the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; Response: Removal of invasive plants and the addition of native plantings have occurred in the area over the past several years. Some of the work for the current proposal may require that native plantings recently installed will need to be relocated. The applicant has agreed, as noted on Sheet L3 of the landscaping plans, that any plants removed will be flagged by the landscape architect and relocated within the shoreline buffer area in a location to be determined by Department of Community Development staff. 5. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. 6. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: As noted above, any plants that will need to be removed shall be relocated within the shoreline buffer area, and will only be done with the approval of staff from the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development. A planting inspection will be required as part of the Public Works permit before and after installation of the park plantings. Native plantings within the park will increase the amount of vegetation on the site, and improve habitat quality in the shoreline area. JR Page 7 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • 8. All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Response: An erosion control plan will be employed and meet the requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: The applicant will obtain all required permits, including a Public Works permit for the proposed site work, and Building Permits for construction of the overlook deck and the picnic shelter. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is proposed for this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: Solid waste disposal is not a part of this project. 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Response: The site is owned by the City. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. Response: This project does not propose any landfilling within the river channel. 15. ... (R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: This project may involve the removal of shrubs currently located in the area where the overlook deck is proposed. Any plants that are removed will be relocated. B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. Uses in the River Environment are restricted to such uses as footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The clouded area on the Landscape Plan (see attached sheet L3) represents areas outside of the park project area that have been planted with restoration plantings. There is no work proposed for this project within the River Environment. JR Page 8 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the River Environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking/loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. Within the Low Impact Environment on this site are located a small amount of the driveway and parking area, landscaping will be added to the park area, the split rail fence separating the park area from the restoration plantings, portions of the porous concrete walkway, the observation deck, picnic tables, benches, and garbage receptacles. The parking and driveway area will be screened from the public right -of -way through the addition of trees and shrubs along 50th Place S, as well through the retention of existing trees within the drainage swale area separating the parking area from 50th Place South, and the addition of new trees, shrubs, and other plantings added as part of a rain garden project within the drainage swale area. TMC 18.44.140 B. states: Low impact environment uses shall conform to the following standards: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations; Response: Very few structures are involved with this project. The observation deck will be located so visitors can view the estuary area and the side channel. The height of the picnic shelter will be well within the 30 -foot height limit of the Low Density Residential (LDR) district. The park uses are a permitted use in the LDR district. 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking/loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; Response: There will be an entrance and exit to /from the parking lot to 50th Place South. This driveway will be one -way, to minimize the required width of pavement required for the driveway. No other access roads for vehicles are proposed. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six -foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or JR Page 9 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d. Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: Landscaping will be planted along the front of the project along 50th Place South, including street trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Trees planted along the street front to screen the parking lot include Big Leaf Maple (Acer macrophylum) and Native Dogwood (Cornus nutalia). In the area directly to the east of the parking area and associated drive aisle, a rain garden will be installed. Existing trees within the proposed rain garden area, as well as three new Big Leaf Maples and several shrubs will be added, along with rain garden plantings installed by the Stewardship Partners. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking/loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. 4. COMMENTS: Karen Walter, Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader for the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division, sent a list of questions about the project to Tukwila staff on January 15, 2009. Her first question was whether or not the hand launch boat ramp proposed under the previous shoreline permit was ever built, and if not, whether one is proposed as part of the current project. She noted that if a boat launch is to be included in the current proposal, she would need information, including plans, to screen the project for potential impacts to Muckleshoot Indian Tribal fishing that occurs in the project area. The boat launch was never constructed under the previous permit, and it has since been determined by the Parks Department that the planned location for the proposed boat launch is too steep to safely launch boats. The Parks Department is not currently planning to have a hand boat launch at the Codiga Park site. The second question from Karen Walter was whether any monitoring reports were available for the side channel work completed by the Army Corps of Engineers. The City of Tukwila never received any reports from the Army Corps of Engineers, and our attempts to find out the status of monitoring of the site have not been successful. However, city staff was able to find one monitoring report for the side channel project online. Staff will send any additional monitoring reports to Karen Walter if they are found. The remaining questions and comments were related to the location, quantity, and species of plantings within the shoreline management area. One of the questions was why only 29 conifer trees were proposed to be planted within the shoreline area, considering the importance these types of trees have for providing shade to the river and for improving 1R Page 10 of 13 H: \Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • water quality. Additionally, Karen Walter wondered what types of plantings are proposed for the areas to the west of the conifers shown on the Landscape Plan. The area west of the side channel was not planted as part of the original side channel project. However, the City of Tukwila has a long term goal to gradually remove invasive plants and plant native shrubs in the area. The City of Tukwila has hired a goat herd to remove invasive plants in this area, and has developed a conceptual planting plan (see attachment). Also, various groups participate in restoration projects at the site. There are many restoration plantings of trees and shrubs that have been added to the shoreline area and the side channel restoration area to the area west of the proposed park. Current plans for the park do not show the areas where invasive plants have been removed and where restoration plantings have been added by groups including People for the Puget Sound and Sound Transit. However, as noted above, the areas in which these groups have been working, and the species of plants they have been adding to the site, is shown on the conceptual planting plan. 5. SEPA: A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on May 9, 2001. The appeal period closed on May 23, 2001; no appeals or comments were received on the DNS. CONCLUSIONS 1. The project site is located in a Low Density Residential district and is designated Low Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan map. The proposed project is a permitted use and is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use as a park, including picnic shelter, overlook deck, interpretive signage, rain garden, and automobile and pedestrian access will not conflict with adjacent land uses. 3. The project will promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shoreline by preserving and enhancing an area of the shoreline for public access and educational opportunities, by promoting economic development in the Puget Sound Region by improving salmon habitat in the Region, and by not interfering with navigation of the Green River. 4. No archeologically significant items were found on the site. The barn and other farm outbuildings were constructed in the 1920's and until recently were the last remaining barn structures in the City. The design of the side channel recently constructed at the site required removal of the barn and other outbuildings in order to maximize the benefit to fish habitat. The buildings were documented through photographs, and the Tukwila Historical Society will assist in writing information that will go on the interpretive signage to educate park visitors of the sites historic significance. The picnic shelter and interpretive sign have been designed to mimic the architecture of the barn. Native plantings added to the park area will enhance the vegetative cover within the shoreline management area. JR Page 11 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits \ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • 5. Public access is provided through the short trail system that provides access to the interpretive signage and the observation deck. Benches and picnic tables, including handicap accessible tables, provide passive recreational enjoyment of the shoreline. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: A. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. B. No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; C. The project may require the relocation of some shrubs within the low impact environment in order to construct the observation deck and split rail fence. A landscaping inspection will be required as part of the Public Works permit, and the Department of Community Development shall be contacted prior to removal of any existing vegetation so that a suitable place for relocation can be flagged in the field. The landscape plan (Sheet L3) illustrates the types of vegetation that will be planted within the park. D. No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be discharged into a rain garden located at the front of the site. Silt fences and siltation control ponds will be used to control storm water prior to discharge into the existing drainage structures. E. All state and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. F. Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project. G. All necessary permits will be obtained for this project. H. No mining will occur with the project. I. The site is owned by the City of Tukwila. No other property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. J. No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment. A. The only structures proposed are a picnic shelter and interpretive signage, observation deck, and split rail fence separating the park from the area of steep slopes where restoration plantings begin. All structures will be well within the 30 foot height limit of the Low Density Residential district. Native landscaping will be provided along the front of the project on 50th Place South, as well as along the southern and western edges of the park. B. The parking lot is located inland within the park site, separated from the side channel by the porous concrete walkway, lawn areas and landscaping. A split rail fence is used to separate the park uses from the aquatic habitat area. C. No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Questions and concerns submitted by Karen Walter of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division were related to whether a hand launch boat ramp will be included in the project, whether there are any monitoring reports available for the side channel work completed by the Army Corps of Engineers, and what the City's plans are for 3R Page 12 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits\ Codiga \Codiga_L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM • • removal of invasive species and planting of native species in the area west of the park. An email was sent in response to these comments and concerns, informing her that the project will no longer include a hand boat launch facility. Any additional monitoring reports the City of Tukwila is able to find for the side channel project will be forwarded to Karen Walter. Additionally, the City of Tukwila has a conceptual plan for restoration planting of native trees and shrubs for the area waterward of the proposed park area. A copy of this plan was sent to Karen by email. 10. A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on May 9, 2001; no comments were received by the May 23, 2001 deadline. 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Shoreline Substantial Development permit. Attachments: A. Landscape Plan (Sheet L3), including design of the park, picnic shelter, overlook deck, walkway, picnic tables, benches, split rail fence, and parking area B. Conceptual Landscape Plan for restoration plantings west of the Codiga Park site. C. Shoreline Cross Sections (Sheet L8) D. Email with questions from Karen Walter and staff responses. JR Page 13 of 13 H:\Shoreline Permits \Codiga \Codiga L08- 038_ShorelineSR.doc 04/27/2009 9:06 AM City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director To: Robert Eaton, Project Manager, Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department From: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, Tukwila Department of Community Development Subject: Codiga Farm Park (Permit #L08 -038) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Date: March 5, 2009 Below is a list of technical comments, based on a review of materials submitted with your application for a Shoreline Permit for the property located at 12529 50th Place S in Tukwila. Materials for this application were reviewed by the Planning and Public Works Departments. Please revise plans submitted with your application to address the comments from Public Works and Planning, as listed below: 1) Please submit Shoreline Cross - Sections, at maximum 75' intervals along the shoreline, showing: • Existing and proposed elevations and improvements • Limits of the 40' River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact environments • Top elevation of bank, landward catch point toe of levee, and base floor elevation (i.e., 100 -year flood) and dike /riverbank maintenance easement 2) At our site visit on 2/25/09, it was mentioned that the street trees shown along 50th PI S may be moved away from the street (to the west) approximately 10 feet to provide extra room for future reconfiguration of 50th PI S, the design of which is not known at this time. If the trees will be moved, the landscape and irrigation plans (Sheets L1, L3, and L4) will need to be modified to show these changes. 3) The size of the overlook deck as shown on the plan sheets varies. For example, the size of the deck as shown in the detail on Sheet L6 is twice as big as the deck as shown on Sheets L1, L3, and L4. Please verify the size of the proposed deck and revise plan sheets as necessary to show accurate size of the overlook, making sure that its proposed location and size is such that as few plantings as possible are disturbed during its construction. Plants removed for the construction will be transplanted into other areas of the off - channel habitat buffer by Parks staff. 4) A parking determination was made for this project in 2001 by the Planning Commission, which required a minimum of 12 parking spaces. Currently, 10 JR Page 1 of 3 H:\Shoreline Permits \Codiga\HighlightedTechnical Comments_Codiga.doc 04/20/2009 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 spaces are proposed. A modification to the decision made by the Planning Commission will need to be made prior to issuance of the construction permit. 5) Verify dimensions of parking stalls (length and width), and the width of drive aisles, to ensure they meet the code requirements of chapter 18.56 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC). Please refer to Figure 6 of TMC 18.56.040 showing Off - Street Parking Area Dimensions (enclosed). Note that up to 30% of the required parking may be for compact cars. 6) Please add at least three trees and some shrubs to the swale area. According to the 1Public Works Department, trees planted within or near the existing swale located along 50th Ave S shalll be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from the existing infiltration system. To minimize ,potential public safety issues it is recommended that low growing shrubs or groundcovers be planted. Some suggestions — • Groundcover (in wetter areas of the swale): Juncus effusus (Soft rush), Geum macrophyllum (Large - leaved avens), Carex stipata (Sawbeak sedge). These could be planted as a seed mix. ; • Shrubs (on the outside edges /dryer areas of the swale): Pachistima myrsinites (Mountain (Boxwood), IMahonia nervosa (Dull Oregon Grape); • Trees (on the outside edges /dryer areas of the swale): Crataegus dougiasii (Black Hawthorne), 'Pinus contorta contorta (Shore pine) (can be limbed up as it grows for better visibility). 7) On Sheet L3 (Landscape Plan), the species for big leaf maple should be Acer macrophyllum — see redlined plan sheet (enclosed). 8) Explain in Notes section of Sheet L3, and/or as a detail on Sheet L5, how existing plants will be removed. Note that no herbicides are allowed, and plants shall be removed by hand or controlled by sheet mulching only. Miscellaneous Comments 1) When 50th PI S is reconfigured in the future, opportunities to bring utilities across 50th PI S for low -level lighting within open areas of the park, in parking lot areas, and along the pathway should be explored. The design and reconfiguration of 50th PI S is not known at this time. Future improvements along 50th PI S may include curb, gutter, 5' wide concrete sidewalk, street lighting, and asphalt paving. The cost of the future frontal improvements along 50th PI S adjacent to Codiga Park shall be paid by the City of Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department. 2) For any plants proposed within the buffer area where restoration plantings have already occurred, locations for new plantings will need to be marked for inspection by DCD staff. JR Page 2 of 3 04/20/2009 H:\Shoreline Permits \Codiga\HighlightedTechnical Comments_Codiga.doc 3) As part of the Public Works permit, the following will be required: • Landscaping inspection, to include comment #2 of Miscellaneous Comments, above. • Fence installed by the Corps of Engineers and goose enclosure shall be removed. • A bike rack, providing parking for at least one bike, is required. For the Public Works permit, please add bike parking to the site plan and site amenities listed on page L3. A good location for the bike parking is in the vicinity of the shelter structure, which is a prominent location that can be easily seen from different areas of the park. • Review of the language /information that will be shown on both of the signs, including the historical sign to be located near the shelter, and the environmental information to be shown on the overlook. 4) Separate building permits will be required for construction of the overlook deck and the shelter. I recommend we meet to go over the comments in this letter. Please let me know if you have any questions in the meantime. Sincerely, Jaimie Reavis Enc.: 1) Figure 6 of TMC 18.56.040 showing Off - Street Parking Area Dimensions 2) Redlined plan sheet L3 JR Page 3 of 3 04/20/2009 H: \Shoreline Permits \Codiga HighlightedTechnical Comments_Codiga.doc q v /r •• taa kkkc4k, X908 Parks and Recreation Department Bruce Fletcher, Director RECEIVED FEB 11 2009 MEMORANDUM COMMUNITY D LOPUE 1T Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner, Dept. of Community Development Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, Dept. of Community Development FROM: Robert Eaton, Project Coordinator DATE: February 11, 2009 RE: Codiga Park Permit ( #L08 -038) Comments and Re- Submittal CC: Rick Still, Parks & Recreation Deputy Director Erik Sweet, Landscape Architect, SLA Landscape Architecture Below you will find a list of comments in regards to the various comments made by both Planning and Public Works Departments about Codiga Park. For ease of following the items are referenced the same as from your comments in the original format. Planning 1. All water lines are included. 2. Checklist Items: a. Written Description (See attached Review Guidelines) b. 13. Shoreline Site Plan (a) — (h) (from the checklist) (a) included, pg GO (b) included, all pages (c) Construction limits are not in this area. (d) included, all pages (e) Construction limits are not in this area. (f) included, pg C2 (g) included, pg L3 (h) included, pg C3 c. 14. Shoreline Cross Sections (from the comments) • No proposed cut and fill. Landscape improvements are propsed in plans on sheet L3 and only adds topsoil. The 40', 100', 200' water lines are included on all sheets. d. 15. Landscape Plan (from the comments) • 15(b) All existing trees to be retained will be shown and protection measures are called out on pg C2. Codiga Park Construction L08 -038 February 11, 2009 RECEIVED FEB 11 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 2 (a) All landscaping plants will be native species as per the list from Planning. Detailed on pg L3. • 2 (b) Street frontage landscaping is on L3. • 2 (c) Topsoil notes specify at least 10% organic material, pg L3. • 2 (d) This is area is not being used for storm water quality. --- • 2 (e) Additional native plantings will be included at the street wkc;tu edge, pg L3. • 2 (f) Parking lot location in reference to the 40' water line is marked on pg C3. • 2 (g) There is no boat launch included in this project. • 2 (h) Method of protecting trees is noted on pg C2. • 2 (i) Plan details of the historical sign are included and will be installed by the Boy Scout of America as an Eagle Scout Project. • 2 (j) Plan details of the picnic shelter are attached to the plans. • 2 (k) All walkways will be paved pervious concrete, pg L3 • 2 (I) This is no portable toilet. • 2 (m) There will be separate signage identifying the park at a later date and wil be installed by the city. • 2 (n) Title Report • 2 (o) on the Title report e. Public Works (from the comments) 1. Ok 2. Ok 3. This is attached. 4. Drainage swale was not designed as a water quality facility. f. 17. Civil Plans (from the checklist) (a) Civil Plans will be stamped and signed. (b) 1' contours are shown, dashed existing and solid is proposed. (c) Construction limit lines are shown on existing drawings. (d) No easements shown on survey, no new utility easements are planned. g. 20. Other (from the checklist) 1. Salmon signage will be the King County standard signage for the Duwamish Water way habitat areas. The location of this signage will be on the overlook deck. 2. Historical signage will be in the shape resembling the former Codiga barn and will include historical information of the land and will be installed by the Boy Scouts of America as an Eagle Scout Project. 3. Park Name sign will be installed at a later time per Tukwila procedures. Codiga Park Construction L08 -038 February 11, 2009 • city of Tukwila • • • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director To: Robert Eaton, Project Manager, Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department From: '`ti Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner, Tukwila Department of Community Development Subject: Codiga Farm Park ( #L08 -038) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Date: September 17, 2008 Staff have completed its review of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application (L08 -038) Codiga Farm Park, which was deemed complete on August 8, 2008. Comments from each department are listed separately below. Please direct any questions related to this memo and your resubmittal directly to me. Planning 1. In general, the location of the Shoreline Environment (River Environment, Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment) shall be shown on all the site /construction plans. 2. Provide the following as per the attached Complete Application Checklist. We have included an application checklist for your reference: a. #11. Written description of project consistency with decision criteria b. 13. Shoreline Site Plan— Please show the following: • 13(a) through (h) c,14— Shoreline Cross - Sections at maximum 75' intervals along the shoreline showing: • Exisiting and proposed elevations and improvements • Limits of the 40' River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact environments • Top of bank elevation, I h and base floor elevation (i.e. 100 year flood) and dike /riverbank maintenance easement d. 15 -- Landscape Plan Rf 1 09/17/2008 Q: \Codiga Park— Shoreline —L08- 038 \StaCodiga - -1st comments.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 2.06- 431 -3665 • 15(b) —Show all existing trees to be retained and note any tree protection measures required (i.e. fencing at drip line) • Also see comments 2 (a) through (c) below. e. 17- -Civil Plans • 17 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. • 17 (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals • 17 (d) Construction limit lines, areas of clearing /grading /filling and volume and type of expected cut and fill • 17(e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements 2. Most of the following comments refer to issues raised in Carol Lumb's 5/26/08 email to Eric Sweet. These issues were not reflected in the submittal and need to be addressed in the plans. a. All plants must be native species. A copy of the Corps of Engineers plant list is enclosed. Red Sunset Maple, Yellow Twig Dogwood, Flowering Currant (King Edward), Rhododendron and Spirea cannot be used. b. The conceptual landscaping plan approved as part of the original permit showed landscaping along the street frontage of the site. c. Notes must specify the topsoil mix to be used, and ensure that it is composed of at least 10% organic material. d. Provide additional detail for the area labeled "parking lot swale." If this is to be used for water quality /storm water treatment, King County Storm Water guidelines require that details are provided of the seed mix to be used. d. Provide additional native plantings at the street edge of the swale. e. Where is the parking in relation to the river environment? Access roads and parking shall be a minimum of 40' from the mean high water mark. f. Will the project include a boat launch (as per the original project)? If so, please show the boat launch on the site plans. Provide construction details. How will it be accessed? Rf 2 09/17/2008 Q: \Codiga Park -- Shoreline - -L08- 038 \StaCodiga - -1st comments.doc g. In the construction notes, indicate the specific method for protecting existing trees during construction. h. Will all walkways be paved? Consider porous asphalt paths, as you've shown for the parking area. i. Provide details of the proposed historical sign design. Per the 2001 approval, the design of the sign shall mimic architectural elements of the former barn and pictures of the farming activities and structures will be included. What text will be provided? Have you checked with the Tukwila Historical Society as indicated in the 2001 application? j. Please provide architectural details of the picnic shelter structure. Per the 2001 approval, the design of the picnic structure shall mimic architectural elements of the former barn. Provide dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. k. Will a portable toilet be included in the plans? If so, where will it be located? I. Will there be separate signage identifying the park? A separate sign permit will be required for that. m. Please provide a title report. n. Provide lot lines 300' feet from the site's property lines, including rights - of -way. Public Works: Public Works staff has provided the following comments: 1. 50th PL South is a collector arterial. Improvements along 50th PL South are not required as part of this proposal / project. Street lighting is adequate and will not be required to be designed or upgraded, as part of this proposal / project. 2. The design and re- configuration of 50th PL South is not known at this time. Future improvements along 50th PL South may include; curb, gutter, 5' wide concrete sidewalk, street lighting, and asphalt paving. The cost of the future frontal improvements along 50th PL South; adjacent to Codiga Park shall be paid by the City of Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department. 3. As part of the future Public Works permit for this project; a Storm Drainage Report is required, and shall be designed per the King County Surface Rf 3 09/17/2008 Q: \Codiga Park -- Shoreline - -L08- 038 \StaCodiga - -1st comments.doc Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. If less than 5,000 sf of new impervious surface is proposed, then only water quality is required. The Storm Drainage Report shall be designed and stamped by a Washington State Licensed Professional Engineer. 4. The drainage swale shown the plan sheets will be further evaluated, as part of the future Public Works permit. Please contact me at 206 -431 -3683 or via e-mail at rfox(a)ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions or would like to discuss these comments. These applications will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.104.070(E). Rf 4 09/17/2008 Q: \Codiga Park — Shoreline - -L08- 038 \StaCodiga - -1st comments.doc COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). C ec terns ` inform on:Re uired. subtted application be�waived in unusual:cases, upon appr. oval of botlr Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ". 4. Application Fee $2,435. 5. SEPA Environmental Checklist (see SEPA Application Packet). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Signs Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 7. Payment of a $110 mailing label fee to the City of Tukwila or Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks —must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). 8. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 9. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). 10. Vicinity Map with site location, does not have to be to scale. ` 11. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) Check with a planner if you are unsure what criteria apply to your project. 12. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). Provide a geotechnical analysis of river bank stability if alteration is proposed. See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www. ci .tukwila.wa.us/dcd/dcdplan.htm) for additional information. SHORELINE SITE PLAN: 13 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". P :\Planning Forms \Applications\2007 Applications\Shore- 12 -07.doc Check items submitted with application Information Requi. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning (b) Existing top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water mark and base flood elevation (i.e., the 100 year flood). (c) For work riverward of the MHWM: Distance work extends into the river and distance to Federal projects and navigation channels. (d) If the project is within the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program show the limits of the 40' River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact environments. If subject to the King County Shoreline Master Plan identify the appropriate setback per KCC 25.16. (e) Dike/ riverbank maintenance easement (min. 30' from the top of bank). (f) Construction limit lines and areas of clearing/grading /filling including volume and type of fill or extracted material. (g) Public access and/or trails. (h) Parking lots, driveways, loading and service areas. CROSS - SECTIONS FOR SHORELINE PROJECTS 14. SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS at maximum 75' intervals along the shoreline showing: • Existing and proposed elevations and improvements, • Limits of the 40' River, 100' Low Impact and 200' High Impact environments, • The top of bank elevation, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water mark and base flood elevation (i.e., the 100 year flood), and Dike/ riverbank maintenance easement (min. 30' from the top of bank). LANDSCAPE PLAN: 9 15 (a) Landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". See TMC 18.52 or KCC 25.16.030 as appropriate. (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: 16 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36 ". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks, tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. CIVIL PLANS: �/ 17 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See www.ci. tukwila. wa. us/ pubwks /bulletins/floodcontrol.�df for further information (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. (d) Construction limit lines, areas of clearing/grading /filling and volume and type of expected cut and fill. •(e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements. (f) If additional impervious surface is proposed, provide a storm drainage design at least 90% P:\Planning Fonns\Applications\2007 Applications\Shore- 12 -07.doc , ,.:k items rbmitted with application ' Information Req • • May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning - complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to www.ci. tukwila. wa. us /pubwks/pwpermit.htm#techinfo. (g) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (h) Footprints of all existing and proposed buildings. (i) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls. OTHER: 18. If new construction is proposed, provide dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and /or any proposed screening. 19. If site lighting changes are proposed provide a luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot - candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. i< 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. 21. Any other drawings or materials needed to explain your proposal. P:1Planning Foma Appliations\Shora6.06.doc Decanter 4, 2006 RECEMSE. MAY 181009 COMAOLINITy DEV Qp DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Avenue SE • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000 STATE OF WASHINGTON • May 13, 2009 City of Tukwila Department of Parks and Recreation Attn: Robert Eaton 4424 — 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 Dear Mr. Eaton: I certify that I mailed a copy of this document to the persons and addresses listed herein, postage prepaid, i a receptacle for Unit d States mail in � t' 1/ C vue, W Washington On b ly 9 Subject: City of Tukwila — Approved City of Tukwila Department of Parks and Recreation - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # - 2009 NW 90016 Purpose: Notification of Receipt of Approved Substantial Development Permit (SDP) On May 6, 2009 the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Tukwila approved your application for an SDP. Your permit is for construction park improvements including trails, landscaping, picnic tables, benches, a picnic shelter, and parking. This activity will occur within River, Low Impact and High Impact environments within the shoreline jurisdiction of the Duwamish River. By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with the following: • The Shoreline. Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) • Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173 -27 -150 WAC) • The City of Tukwila Local Shoreline Master Program Local governments, after reviewing the SDP for compliance, are required to submit the SDPs to Ecology for filing. Your approved SDP has been received and filed by Ecology. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you to wait at least 21 days from the date we received the decision letter from the City of Tukwila on May 6, 2009. This waiting period allows anyone who (including you) disagrees with any aspect of this permit, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. You 2 • City of Tukwila Department of Parks and Recreation May 13, 2009 Page 2 of 2 must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. If no appeal is submitted you may begin activities any time after May 27, 2009. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend, however, you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 459 -6327 or http : / /www.eho.wa.govBoards /SHB.asp. If /al want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http: / /apps.leg.wa.gov /wac. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at (425) 649 -4260. Sincerely, y� Dave Radabaugh, Shoreline Planner Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program cc: Jaimie Reavis, City of Tukwila • • Jaimie Reavis - Codiga Park Shoreline Permit - response to your questions Page 1 of 3 From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Jaimie Reavis karen.walter @muckleshoot.nsn. us 04/21/2009 4:56 PM Codiga Park Shoreline Permit - response to your questions Hi Karen, Below is the email message in response to your original list of questions for the Codiga Park project. From your question #1 below, we said we would share details about the proposed hand boat launch to be located at the beach. After our most recent round of comments, our Parks Department decided to remove the hand boat launch facility entirely from the current scope of work of the park. Also, the attached document is the Conceptual Plan the City has for restoration plantings waterward of the proposed park area. Please let me know if you have any additional questions /comments. Thanks, Jaimie Reavis Assistant Planner City of Tukwila PH: (206) 431 -3659 Ms Walter, Below are responses to your 1/15/09 email request for additional information concerning the Codiga Farm Park project. Sandra Whiting, Tukwila's urban environmentalist, has provided this information and has indicated her responses in red in the body of your message. In addition, Sandra has provided a conceptual planting plan that People for Puget Sound is using. Per question # 2, we will send you a monitoring report once we have obtained one. We have not located additional files at this point. Tukwila Planning staff is in the process of reviewing the project. Planning staff has made comments to the applicant (Tukwila Parks Department), and is waiting for response. My responsibilities have changed, and this project will be reassigned to Jaimie Reavis. Jaimie can be reached at 206 -431 -3659 or jreavis @ci.tukwila.wa.us The responses to your questions follow below: 1. 1) Was the proposed hand launch boat ramp ever built for this project? It is shown in the drawing that was included in the staff memorandum for File E01 -007. If not, is the launch proposed as part of the park improvements? We couldn't find it on the large plan set. We need to know this information so that we can screen this project for potential impacts to Muckleshoot Indian Tribal fishing that occurs in the project area. The boat launch was never built as part of the original project. Per our Parks Department, the planned location for the launch is too steep to safely launch boats, because of a last minute change in the site design and grading plan. The new proposal is to allow launching at the beach using an existing fisherman's trail. Parks Department has been asked for details about the proposed boat launch, which we will share with you when they are received. 2. Are there any monitoring reports available for the side channel work completed by the Army Corps at this site? If so, we would appreciate getting a copy of these reports. The Department of Community Development did not receive any monitoring reports, but was able to find one report on the internet. Our attempts to contact the Corps to find out the status of monitoring of the site have not been successful. We will send you a hard copy of the single monitoring report we have and will be going through old file: / /C:\ temp\ XPGrpWise \49EDFACEtuk- mail6300 -po 100168626D 191 C 11 \GW } 00001.... 04/22/2009 • • Page 2 of project files in Public Works to see if they have any other reports. We will send you any additional reports if we find any. 3. Why are only 29 conifer tree species (i.e. westem red cedar and Douglas fir) proposed to be planted on more than 800 lineal feet of shoreline along the Green River? How was the amount determined? What is the expected amount of shade over the Green River that will occur as a result of planting the proposed number of conifers? As you know, the site is currently lacking large trees along the river that could provide shade and a source of wood recruitment for salmon habitat as documented in King County's 2004 report, "Lower Green River Baseline Habitat Survey Report" ( http: / /www.govlink.org/watersheds /9/ reports /LowerGreenBaseline.aspx). Since the site is within a portion of the Green /Duwamish River that currently does not meet state water quality standards (see http: // apps .ecy.wa.gov /wqawa /viewer.htm), it is very important that the revegetation plan is such to provide sufficient shade in the future. Several species of conifers were planted as part of the restoration area plantings that are not shown on the plans. In addition, there is a long -term goal of planting a variety of trees and shrubs on the west side of the restoration area - see the response to questions 4 and 5 below. The trees proposed for planting as part of this park plan are meant to complement the trees in the restoration area and those trees that are being or will be planted on the west side of the restoration area. 4. What is the planting proposal for the areas shown to the west of the conifers? Is this area currently covered in blackberries and other invasive species or was it all replanted with native species as part of the side channel project? The area west of the side channel was not planted as part of the original project. However, the City has a long -term goal to gradually remove invasive plants and plant native trees and shrubs in that area. We will send you a copy of the conceptual planting plan /plant list that we prepared for People for Puget Sound to use as a guide. The City has hired a goat herd to help control blackberries and other weeds in that area for the last two years in a row. People for Puget Sound has had four work parties with volunteers to do additional weed removal and plant native trees and shrubs in the area, following the City's planting plan. We do not currently have information on the numbers of plants that have been installed to date, but are attempting to get that information. As funds become available, more plants will be installed by volunteers and we are hoping that People for Puget Sound will continue to remain involved in stewardship. The Parks Department has been irrigating the plants by hand during the summer but recently People for Puget Sound volunteers installed irrigation piping to provide for more consistent watering during the dry seasons until plants are established. 5. Where is the proposed Sound Transit restoration work to occur at this project site (see http: / /www.ecy.wa.gov /news /2007news /2007- 320.html)? The proposed Sound Transit restoration work is the weeding and planting work being carried out by People for Puget Sound. The funds were transferred to that agency in order to carry out the work. 6. Where is the planting work that was conducted at this site in October 2008 by People for Puget Sound? See the response to questions 4 and 5 above. file: / /C:\temp\XPGrpWise\49EDFACEtuk-mail6300-po 100168626D 191 C 11 \GW } 00001.... 04/22/2009 • • Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us Page 3 of 3 file: / /C:\ temp\ XPGrpWise \49EDFACEtuk- mail6300 -po 100168626D 191 C 11 \GW} 00001.... 04/22/2009 Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax: (206) 431 -3665 Fax City Of Tukwila To: `Ro •- P.V I e 4 -(Uv1 From: cam,. ✓n ( /- Fax: ?.0 (a - 1 La 1 - ,294 Date: 2 - 1-1 - 01 Phone: 31(e - Z, j (o(o Pages: L' Re: (,nd5,S f.— ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle •Comments: ROA/ ((AAA 51A4 WzA:4 , G GLeS5 +,\ t 4 refAkA &c,--(2__ 5 , Z G^-i- / l h3 ;in ( YV A( a4,J a .^2_ r e S P: \administrative\FORMS1Cover.doc 01/23/2007 11:02 AM TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Goal 5.2 Shoreline Planning and Management Expanded value of the river as a community and regional resource through regional coordination of shoreline management programs and through programs that foster river awareness, involving partnerships among businesses, schools, residents and government and community organizations. Policies 5.2.1 Coordinate shoreline planning and management activities with other local jurisdictions to establish region -wide consistency in addressing river issues with regional impli- cations, such as economic development, public access, wildlife habitat, water quality control, and flood control. L 5.2.2 Promote river stewardship and increase river awareness through actions which further shoreline goals, such as educational programs, community activities, and partnerships with . Tukwila residents, businesses, schools, government, and community organizations. Goal 5.3 Land Development Use and Economic Vitality Development along the shoreline that fosters the economic vitality of Tukwila while preserving the long -term benefits of the river. General Policies 5.3.1 Develop and implement river design guidelines to: — Guide the design of shoreline multiple uses; and — Establish techniques for increasing shoreline multiple use; and — Prioritize locations for uses. 5.3.2 Design and locate all shoreline development to minimize impacts on areas identified as important for other river uses, such as wildlife and aquatic habitat, river vegetation, public access and recreation, historical resources, and flood control. 5.3.3 Allow structures to be placed in the water, or structural reinforcement of the riverbank, only when this provides a significant, long -term public benefit or is essential to a water - dependent use. December 3, 2007 Shoreline Li MC -40 - hLS\ C 515/14.5 -6 tevt4.- w' t( 61_ 1 v4 s fit 112.1 ail- Godcsk (E.✓nne✓ bait A %nrPt n1U 4 n��/-rb'w� o p ` O V i Vv r 15 111'1(1 Jot niO.. 55 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Goal 5.6 Access and Recreational Use Varied opportunities for public access to and along the river, including visual and cultural access, access to the water's edge, opportunities for small boat navigation and access, and connections to other neighborhoods. (Figure 8) General Policies 5.6.1 Retain and improve areas identified as important in the network of public access to the river, including cross -town connections, former railroad rights-of-way and unimproved street rights-of-way, historic sites, unique natural features, or other areas valuable for their interpretive potential. 5.6.2 Develop and implement comprehensive river access guidelines to guide the design, location, and management of shoreline public access; to identify types of access appro- priate for various site conditions and locations; and to establish strategies, funding sources, and priorities for acquisition and enhancement of shoreline public access. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ♦ River design guidelines 4 River access guidelines ♦ Shoreline development standards Trail River Banners or Public Art 1 Shoreline Sgcarity Fence Screened From Trail 4 Restored Bank Vegetation Figure 8 — Visual access features in lieu of physical access Landscape Buffer December 3, 2007 59 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Shoreline ?(5.6.3 Design, locate and manage public access for diverse types and variable levels of intensity, in order to minimize impacts on vulnerable features of the natural environment and to minimize conflicts with private property uses. (Figure 8) Where shoreline development provides public access areas, reserve such areas through the means most appropriate for the type, scale, and impacts of the development, such as donation or sale of an easement or right-of-way to the City. 5.6.5 Support the implementation of the King County Green River Trail, per the existing King County Green River Trail Master Plan. 5.6.4 Policies for Development Outside MIC 5.6.6 Require subdivisions, multi-family residential uses and commercial and industrial uses along the shoreline to provide a trail for public access along the river in areas identified for trail connections, consistent with the King County Green River Trail Master Plan. Require any property not included in the King County Green River Trail Plan to provide public access or a private natural area in lieu of physical public access. X 5.6.7 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES + King County Green River Trail Master Plan amendment • River access guidelines Where shoreline public access is provided, ensure that it is designed to be safe and convenient and includes access amenities such as benches, drinking fountains, public parking areas, handicapped access, and appropriate lighting, consistent with the river access guidelines. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY • River access guidelines 5.6.8 Except for single-family residential development of four or fewer single family residential lots, shoreline developments shall maintain views of the water from the shoreline and from upland areas, through appropriate design of building height, bulk and modulation, windows, breezeways, and outdoor spaces. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY + River design guidelines -.,60 December 3, 2007 Page 1 of 2 Jaimie Reavis - Codiga Farm Park -- Additional information From: Rebecca Fox To: Karen Walter Date: 02/03/2009 5:00 PM Subject: Codiga Farm Park -- Additional information CC: Jaimie Reavis; Sandra Whiting Attachments: Jaimie Reavis; Sandra Whiting Ms Walter, Below are responses to your 1/15/09 email request for additional information concerning the Codiga Farm Park project. Sandra Whiting, Tukwila's urban environmentalist, has provided this information and has indicated her responses in red in the body of your message. In addition, Sandra has provided a conceptual planting plan that People for Puget Sound is using. Per question # 2, we will send you a monitoring report once we have obtained one. We have not located additional files at this point. Tukwila Planning staff is in the process of reviewing the project. Planning staff has made comments to the applicant (Tukwila Parks Department), and is waiting for response. My responsibilities have changed, and this project will be reassigned to Jaimie Reavis. Jaimie can be reached at 206 -431 -3659 or jreavis @ci.tukwila.wa.us The responses to your questions follow below: 1. 1) Was the proposed hand launch boat ramp ever built for this project? It is shown in the drawing that was included in the staff memorandum for File E01 -007. If not, is the launch proposed as part of the park improvements? We couldn't find it on the large plan set. We need to know this information so that we can screen this project for potential impacts to Muckleshoot Indian Tribal fishing that occurs in the project area. The boat launch was never built as part of the original project. Per our Parks Department, the planned location for the launch is too steep to safely launch boats, because of a last minute change in the site design and grading plan. The new proposal is to allow launching at the beach using an existing fisherman's trail. Parks Department has been asked for details about the proposed boat launch, which we will share with you when they are received. 2. Are there any monitoring reports available for the side channel work completed by the Army Corps at this site? If so, we would appreciate getting a copy of these reports. The Department of Community Development did not receive any monitoring reports, but was able to find one report on the internet. Our attempts to contact the Corps to find out the status of monitoring of the site have not been successful. We will send you a hard copy of the single monitoring report we have and will be going through old project files in Public Works to see if they have any other reports. We will send you any additional reports if we find any. 3. Why are only 29 conifer tree species (i.e. western red cedar and Douglas fir) proposed to be planted on more than 800 lineal feet of shoreline along the Green River? How was the amount determined? What is the expected amount of shade over the Green River that will occur as a result of planting the proposed number of conifers? As you know, the site is currently lacking large trees along the river that could provide shade and a source of wood recruitment for salmon habitat as documented in King County's 2004 report, "Lower Green River Baseline Habitat Survey Report" (http: / /www.govlink.org/ watersheds /9/ reports /LowerGreenBaseline.aspx). Since the site is within a portion of the Green /Duwamish River that currently does not meet state water quality standards (see http: // apps .ecy.wa.gov /wqawa /viewer.htm), it is very important that the revegetation plan is such to provide sufficient shade in the future. file: / /C:\ temp\ XPGrpWise \49887840tuk- mail6300 -po 100168626D 17BF81 \GW} 00001.H... 04/21/2009 Page 2 of 2 Several species of conifers were planted as part of the restoration area plantings that are not shown on the plans. In addition, there is a long -term goal of planting a variety of trees and shrubs on the west side of the restoration area - see the response to questions 4 and 5 below. The trees proposed for planting as part of this park plan are meant to complement the trees in the restoration area and those trees that are being or will be planted on the west side of the restoration area. 4. What is the planting proposal for the areas shown to the west of the conifers? Is this area currently covered in blackberries and other invasive species or was it all replanted with native species as part of the side channel project? The area west of the side channel was not planted as part of the original project. However, the City has a long -term goal to gradually remove invasive plants and plant native trees and shrubs in that area. We will send you a copy of the conceptual planting plan /plant list that we prepared for People for Puget Sound to use as a guide. The City has hired a goat herd to help control blackberries and other weeds in that area for the last two years in a row. People for Puget Sound has had four work parties with volunteers to do additional weed removal and plant native trees and shrubs in the area, following the City's planting plan. We do not currently have information on the numbers of plants that have been installed to date, but are attempting to get that information. As funds become available, more plants will be installed by volunteers and we are hoping that People for Puget Sound will continue to remain involved in stewardship. The Parks Department has been irrigating the plants by hand during the summer but recently People for Puget Sound volunteers installed irrigation piping to provide for more consistent watering during the dry seasons until plants are established. 5. Where is the proposed Sound Transit restoration work to occur at this project site (see http: / /www.ecy.wa.gov /news /2007news/2007- 320.html)? The proposed Sound Transit restoration work is the weeding and planting work being carried out by People for Puget Sound. The funds were transferred to that agency in order to carry out the work. 6. Where is the planting work that was conducted at this site in October 2008 by People for Puget Sound? See the response to questions 4 and 5 above. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us file: / /C:\temp\ XPGrpWise 149887840tuk- mail6300 -po 100168626D 17BF811GW } 00001.H... 04/21/2009 • City of Tu la Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division 39015 172nd Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 January 7, 2009 Dear Ms. Walter: Enclosed please find background materials for L08 -038 as you requested in your email. This project is an update of the Codiga Farm Side Channel and Park project which had SEPA review (E01 -007) and shoreline permit approval (LO1 -022) in 2001. A DNS was issued in 2001, and was sent to the Muckleshoot Tribe at that time. The original proposal was to construct a side channel for fish habitat enhancement, picnic shelter and interpretive signage for habitat restoration project, boat launch and parking for picnic and community garden usage within the shoreline environment. The side channel enhancement was carried out by the US Army Corps of Engineers, but the remainder of the work was postponed. The original shoreline permit expired, and the current submittal is an update of the park portion of the project. I am enclosing the plans for the current proposal (L08 -038), as well as background materials from the earlier application. If you desire additional information, please contact me to set up an appointment to view the files. Sincerely, lezee,e-oic Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enclosures: Application form (L08 -038) Plans (L08 -038) Notice of Decision (5/25/01) Memorandum (5/24/01) DNS (5/9/01) Rf 1 01/07/2009 H:\Codiga Park -- Shoreline - -L08- 038 \Muckleshoot.info.reauest.Karen Walter.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 a Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 4 • Memorandum (5/8/01) Notice of Application (4/6/01) Completeness (4/6/01) SEPA application form/Checklist (3/13/01) Codiga Farms Backwater Channel (Graphic —US Army Corps of Engineers) Project Vicinity Map Rf 2 01/07/2009 H: \Codiga Park-- Shoreli - -L08- 038 \Muckleshoot.info.request.Karen Walter.doc • To: Robert Eaton, Parks From: Rebecca Fox, DCD Subj: Landscaping Requirements at Codiga Farm Park Date: January 7, 2009 Planning staff met to discuss your request to modify the landscape plan that was part of the previously- approved shoreline permit for Codiga Farm Park. We understand your concerns regarding safety and surveillance for the park. We would like to accommodate your concerns, and also need to comply with the City's shoreline requirements, and the approved shoreline permit. We all want to achieve a quality park development. Reviewing your request, staff determined that Parks shall provide trees and plantings along the street frontage, as per the original permit, rather than exclusively grass as the plans now show. In consideration of your concerns pertaining to safety and visibility, staff will allow some modification to the approved plan, and suggested the following plantings: Trees- - Paper Bark Birch Native Hawthorn (Crategus douglasii) Single Stem Vine Maple (if available) Groundcover -- Beach Strawberry (Fragaria Chiloensis ) Woodland Strawberry (Fragaria Vesca) These trees would be especially appropriate to your site, and would address your desire to have "eyes on the street." They can be limbed up for visibility and/or are smaller in size to fit into the available space. Trees should be planted no more than 30 feet apart along the frontage of the park. With frontage of approximately 300', this would amount to ten trees. The trees should be placed sufficiently far from the street right of way that they will not be affected when street improvements are made in the future. Please provide a combination of grass and groundcover. To ensure good tree growth, ground cover, rather than grass, should be planted around the trees. For your reference, a copy of the original, approved landscape plan is enclosed. Please contact me if you have further questions. Enc. Rf 1 01/07/2009 H: \Codiga Park -- Shoreline - -L08- 038 \Codiga. Landscape .requirements.1- 7- 09.doc [.o(-D22 IEEE 5 _ ..moorL LP • P€2,etic -� 40 'I -rM. e. + 2ne,A. � ( - l 2.L1 8 S rL L n 4 --i S cA a e- pert L P00 -TO "TYt ® oRJ+ -SS ` C'toV Y— vQ.ou—'0 Co v i.. -1- Ef_71 _ 1 x ps1 59 cc t w ( 0-4 Co■n- • ATTACHMENT D -2 LOCATION OF RIVER, LOW IMPACT AND HIGH IMPACT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF SIDE CHANNEL FROM OHWM `ID 0 o 40, 100r zooJ fr.ofoostn ATTACHMENT D -2 CCV1C9A- &MS 7M2-4c 0.0n L SC ereE �c v C, rry OF —[V lkLi4- �ir-1 ? E E t MA.• A • c of J ufuaW Dept. Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION r I, (UT I 5\i'4 d,t) (' HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Name: / til 1r 5'/ eb0r2/110/ y E Project Number: G Q", a-58: Notice of Public Hearing Mailer's signature: i� 7 _ //' / i�� Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: eLmitsgx)v r4 /� ',, ,, / (�� C/% ea��' G/ %c.� r�c (-/ /c_._a ,;-7 • 2 % i Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this q day of in the year 20 9 P: \USERS \TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: / til 1r 5'/ eb0r2/110/ y E Project Number: G Q", a-58: Mailing requested by: 6 eeee,a ---/-,K, Mailer's signature: i� 7 _ //' / i�� P: \USERS \TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC RECEIVED FEB 1 7Z009 TUOVIIA Ci0 of Tukwila PUBLIC WORKS Department of Community Development Land Use Routing form for Revisions To: 0 Building E Fire.Dept. 0 Police Dept OF'arks/Rec. Public Works: (please list the name) DAtte int;Pherron4-- .FILE. NUMBER Los? -og Project: coepie, paw lc_ - 57,,,,r4/1'„e .p6,7,2_, t_ - Address: i 91 gOIL Pi Date transmitted 2 /13/01 Response requested by 2./2...-7/o 9 Planner: z-faimit, . Date response received: COMMENTS k o 4.6. Li wl /416-E PvBLte (4i(- C46J N at$04.14eA4s, 24/27/c1 DRC review requested 0 Plan submittal requested 0 Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: MEMORANDUM www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner cD dfll FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: February 27, 2009 SUBJECT: Codiga Park 12529 — 50th PL South Shoreline and Miscellaneous Comments Shoreline — L08 -038 Shoreline meets Public Works requirements. Miscellaneous Comments 1. 50th PL South is a collector arterial. Improvements along 50th PL South are not required as part of this proposal / project. Street lighting is adequate and will not be required to be designed or upgraded, as part of this proposal / project. 2. The design and re- configuration of 50th PL South is not known at this time. Future improvements along 50th PL South may include; curb, gutter, 5' wide concrete sidewalk, street lighting, and asphalt paving. The cost of the future frontal improvements along 50th PL South; adjacent to Codiga Park shall be paid by the City of Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department. 3. Trees /Shrubs planted within or near the existing swale located along 50th Ave. South, shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from the existing infiltration system. E. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Land Use Routing form for Revisions TO: jgBuilding ❑ Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept ❑Parks/Rec. ❑ Public Works: (please list the name) - - FILE NUMBER LOF (038 Project: jn Gee ti - (chnc ! t Address: /.a. e2°/ 62712- p/ S . .. Date transmitted 2 /ijp 1 • Response requested by X127/0 q - Planner: vdyv[rL Date response received: COMMENTS "'LP J!e ,;%J f c of ✓w ."'!Dr / DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: ` —/ 7—op. Comments prepared by: E V E D ree C FEB 11 2009 ,r,UN,TYCity of Tukwila .:• MEW Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http • / /tvtviv.ci. Tukwila wa. us REVISION SUBMITTAL Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: February 11, 2009 Plan Check/Permit Number: L08 -038 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Codiga Park Construction 12529 50th Place South Robert Eaton Phone Number: (206) 396-2566 Summary of Revision: Revised plant list, added street frontage landscaping, other details as requested. All water lines have been added to plans for reference points to construction area (all sheets). Landscape plant selection changes have been made to be strictly native species (sheet L3). Street frontage landscaping added (sheet L3). Irrigation changes to accommodate the landscape alterations (sheet L1) Existing tree protection called out (sheet C2). Included architectural drawings of the picnic shelter and historical signage (see attachments). Sheet Number(s): All sheets have revisions. "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on \ applications \forms - applications on Tine \revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: 1 -2009 • TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L08 -038 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM /wt. Building Planning ■❑I Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. ❑I Parks /Rec Project: Codiga Park Shoreline Permit 0 - 0 46 Address: 12529 50th PI. S -1"3- "/ C L , Date transmitted: 8/6/08 Response requested by: August 27, 2008 Staff coordinator: Rebecca Fox Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and /or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: g- 1 0 - 0 46 Comments prepared by: -1"3- "/ C L , Update date: 5 1,4Act 4'4 /Ate- peety t got e -••-•••••••• (CIA.zt -5 6,124- 1 'Y Vs-9i" 41-*1 R. ael ka/2 will of:. eta,„co 5 4L.Y4 — EPA. . 44/. 5GJEA-y- _ 51A0,),s eteL,_ ht_wize. eA41,4_c 5 (aj NA-4. Itz std-0- 1-' Cv)--.sfvu 434 kaAes. -11( +ell° 1#_:_thiteevle" 511c=f4-le■-e,_ ei.`.Y.tvtiv\ 0'' itZ)(-2 a(4(4? s — – _ _ et,A./v,sy, ste„,, uveve,-;i s&to, y‘. P"P"- 1441 c5"/ o " CLA 1_,S0 Lo4)JeJ-fl( 0161 Sa..) re, 7, te-4- 10 0C+ LW/Ad.:7 1 1 -7 7__CO — to ete, (h-'.r-. vvc't 52?L 5 04, %.:,• • -C-Nv (A—O wurNa 543N4--L pi cl-kNA7- r& 5t4I.e Ole Lds-t1 tir Lib\lr \C"A14^% ') klUsel ..• • (ore-uk, Iln,A 9 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L08 -038 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building .Planning n Public Works Fire Dept. ❑I Police Dept. ❑I Parks /Rec Project: Codiga Park Shoreline Permit Comments Address: 12529 50th PI. S 9A Zirkb00 Date transmitted: 8/6/08 Response requested by: August 27, 2008 Staff coordinator: Rebecca Fox Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 1 `� b 1��sw � � s l wvtx Plan check date: Comments Update date: 9A Zirkb00 prepared by City of Tukwila Department of Community Development ECE V ) AUG 0 7 iUtie TUKWILA PuB4i'c WOR$B File Number L08 -038 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: 0 Building 0 Planning Public Works 10I Fire Dept. 0 Police Dept. 0) Parks /Rec Project: Codiga Park Shoreline Permit Comments Address: 12529 50th PI. S Date transmitted: 8/6/08 Response requested by: August 27, 2008 Staff coordinator: Rebecca Fox Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 5e-e- A rfAct IAIN Coyr+rvt 6w+'T S 111 /d Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: • MEMORANDUM www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: September 11, 2008 SUBJECT: Codiga Park 12529 — 50th PL South Shoreline and Miscellaneous Comments Shoreline — L08 -038 Shoreline meets Public Works requirements. Miscellaneous Comments 1. 50th PL South is a collector arterial. Improvements along 50th PL South are not required as part of this proposal / project. Street lighting is adequate and will not be required to be designed or upgraded, as part of this proposal / project. 2. The design and re- configuration of 50th PL South is not known at this time. Future improvements along 50th PL South may include; curb, gutter, 5' wide concrete sidewalk, street lighting, and asphalt paving. The cost of the future frontal improvements along 50th PL South; adjacent to Codiga Park shall be paid by the City of Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department. 3. As part of the future Public Works permit for this project; a Storm Drainage Report is required, and shall be designed per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. If less than 5,000 sf of new impervious surface, then only water quality is required. The Storm Drainage Report shall be designed and stamped by a Washington State Licensed Professional Engineer. 4. The drainage swale shown the plan sheets will be further evaluated, as part of the future Public Works permit. Rebecca Fox - Re: Codiga Comments - Question From: Rebecca Fox To: Robert Eaton Date: 12/30/2008 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Codiga Comments - Question Robert, I'll need to check on this one. I'll be out until 1/5/09, and will get back with you after the new year. Page 1 of 1 To clarify, the original approved conceptual landscape plan indicated that landscaping would be planted along the front of the project along on 50th Place S. This was to include a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees planted in the area waterward of a split rail fence that was to separate aquatic planting from the park area. The side channel bench area was to be planted with aquatic vegetation. We, too, are eager to move forward with reviewing your project, and cannot proceed until we receive your responses to our staff comment letter, dated September 17, 2008. Thank you and happy new year. Rebecca Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> Robert Eaton 12/30/2008 1:59 PM »> Hey there Rebecca, hope you had a nice Christmas. Well, we are close to finalizing changes from the comments and I wanted to clarify one item. In the comments it was mentioned that the Corps plans included street frontage landscaping... but that is all the comment says. Our plans do not include this because we are designing Codiga Park to match the other parks city-wide. This is for a number of reasons but namely, safety and security (visibility into park from the street). So, provided all is well with that, I will meet with Erik about our finalized revised plans and keep this moving forward. Thanks for your time and have a nice New Year's. -Robert file: / /C: \temp\XPGrpW ise \495A4129tuk- mail6300 -po 100134633 5118DFC 1 \GW } 00001.... 01/07/2009 (12/17/2008) Rebecca Fox - Waterfront Pa0i38, Shoreline Substantial Development it, Notice of ApplicationPage 1 From: Karen Walter <KWalter @muckleshoot.nsn.us> To: "rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us" <rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/15/2008 11:15 AM Subject: Waterfront Park, L08 -038, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Notice of Application Ms. Fox, The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division has reviewed the above referenced Notice of Application. We need additional information about this project and would appreciate it if we could get a site plan for the proposal; a SSDP application or environmental checklist describing the activities at the site; and any technical information including tree surveys, wetland surveys, river surveys that may have been developed for this project. We will need time to review these materials after we receive them. We'll send an email to let you know that we have received the documents and our anticipated review time. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you very much, Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division 39015 172nd Ave SE Auburn, WA 98092 • • e • Rebecca Fox - Re: Codiga Park - Mean High Water Mark, etc. From: Robert Eaton To: :,a.:., •x Date: 12/02/20 1 : :07 AM Subject: Re: Codiga Park - Mean High Water Mark, etc. Page 1 of 2 Rebecca, thanks for getting back to me. It is good to know that we do not need to do an additional survey (it is always good to save the city some money). I have passed the info on to Erik so he can get it plotted on the plans. We are in process with the other comments too and will be in touch. Thanks again. Hope you had a nice Thanksgiving. -Robert »> Rebecca Fox 12/1/2008 4:03 PM »> Hello Robert, Per discussion with staff, Parks Department will not be required to carry out a survey to determine the shoreline environments. You are, however, required to plot, show and label the following on all plans and cross sections: 1) mean high water mark; 2) River Environment -- begins 40' in from mean high water mark; 2) Low Impact Environment- - begins at shoreward edge of River Environment and extends 60' inward; 3) High Impact Environment -- begins at shoreward edge of Low Impact Environment and extends 100' inward. This information is not only a City of Tukwila requirement, but also a requirement of the Washington Department of Ecology Shorelines Team who will review the permit. According to Ryan Larsen of the Public Works Department, the mean high water mark is at 10'3" per NGVD 29. You shall use the elevation and plot the mean high water mark. I hope this is answers your question. How are you doing on the other comments from my September 19, 2008 letter to you? Please let me know if you have more questions. Rebecca Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> Robert Eaton 11/20/2008 12:15 PM »> Carol /Rebecca, I wanted to follow -up with you on Codiga Park and the water level marks. I wasn't sure which of you this is more for...I'll let you two decide that. :o) In regards to the lines delineated on the plans we had submitted, they were based upon the ones that Erik had received from you (based on the Corp's). At the time these were considered fine to use, so they were. However, according to the recent comments from the review process, these lines are not satisfactory. We are at the point of needing to know if these water marks are sufficient for our plans or if a survey is going to file: / /C:\ temp\ XPGrpWise \4934DE9Ftuk- mai16300 -po 10013463351187C 11 \GW } 00001.... 12/17/2008 • • • Page 2 of 2 be required costing the city $10,000 - $15,000 extra. The closest hardscape surfaces to the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is over 65' away and the overlook deck is 59' away, both well clear of the 40' River mark. Can you please review this and advise asap? Thank you ladies! (P.S. Did I hear correctly Carol? ...if so, Happy Birthday!) -Robert file: / /C: \temp\XPGrpW ise \4934DE9Ftuk- mail6300 -po 10013463351187C 11 \GW } 00001.... 12/17/2008 • Rebecca Fox - Codiga Park - Water Marks From: Robert Eaton To: Carol Lumb; Rebecca Fox Date: 11/20/2008 12:15 PM Subject: Codiga Park - Water Marks CC: Erik Sweet; Rick Still . • Page 1 of 1 Carol /Rebecca, I wanted to follow -up with you on Codiga Park and the water level marks. I wasn't sure which of you this is more for...I'll let you two decide that. :o) In regards to the lines delineated on the plans we had submitted, they were based upon the ones that Erik had received from you (based on the Corp's). At the time these were considered fine to use, so they were. However, according to the recent comments from the review process, these lines are not satisfactory. We are at the point of needing to know if these water marks are sufficient for our plans or if a survey is going to be required costing the city $10,000 - $15,000 extra. The closest hardscape surfaces to the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is over 65' away and the overlook deck is 59' away, both well clear of the 40' River mark. Can you please review this and advise asap? Thank you ladies! (P.S. Did I hear correctly Carol? ...if so, Happy Birthday!) -Robert file: / /C:\ temp\ XPGrpWise \492554EBtuk- mail6300 -po 10013463351185D01 \GW } 00001.... 12/01/2008 1 Rebecca Fox - RE: Codiga From: Rebecca Fox To: - �� . Sweet Dat �� 11 /13 /20I: 4:12 PM Subje • : odiga • • Page 1 of 4 Erik, Sounds good. Please give me a call next week. I'm in Monday thru Thursday, out Fridays. My phone # is below my name on this message. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us »> "Erik J. Sweet, RLA" <e2_sla @comcast.net> 11/13/2008 2:10 PM »> I do have several, and have sent a draft of questions to the Parks Dept. Do you have a direct # for me to call you on and ask some questions.. It almost seemed like with some of the comments /questions that the wrong set of plans was being looked at, or maybe it was in how the information was on the plans. not sure, lets chat... My number below if you want to call when you have open time, or if you give me a direct # I will call you. Erik Erik J. Sweet, ASLA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 file: / /C: \temp\XPGrpWise \491 C51 F8tuk- mail6300 -po 10013463351184911 \GW } 00001.... 12/17/2008 • SLA IF mop p CANDSCAP0 www.slalandscapes.com • Page 2 of 4 Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. From: Rebecca Fox [mailto:rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:07 PM To: RLA Erik 3. Sweet Subject: RE: Codiga Hi Erik, Looking forward to your response to our comments. Please let me know if you have questions. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> "Erik]. Sweet, RLA" <e2_sla @comcast.net> 10/24/2008 2:47 PM »> I have met with Civil, and we have reviewed the comments. Several we can address not an issue. Several of the items were on the plan set already... for example the clearing limits, and which trees to save...We can add a tree protection detail however for that one. Some of the comments in regards to High water, mean high water, etc we do not have information as that information was not surveyed. We did get some information from Carol on High Water based upon City of Tukwila GIS information, and that information and offsets are on the plans...OHWM is show on sheet L3, and the offsets of 100' and 200' are also shown on the plans. The entire project site sits inside of the 200' offset. If this information is not acceptable, as it came from Tukwila GIS /Planning Dept, then a land surveyor will need to flag all the perntinent water information, and elevations and then have those surveyed into the current topo plan. I have a complete address of her comments combined for LA and Civil and will file: / /C: \temp\XPGrpWise \491 C51 F8tuk- mail6300 -po 100134633 51184911 \GW } 00001.... 12/17/2008 • forward that to you shortly, I am finishing combining the two sets of comments into one. I will forward via email. Erik J. Sweet, ASLA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 www.slalandscapes.com • • Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. Original Message From: Robert Eaton [mailto:REaton @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:42 AM To: Minnie Dhaliwal; Rebecca Fox Cc: Rick Still; Erik Sweet Subject: Re: Codiga Rebecca, payment with Fast Signs is taken care of, they were given a PO# (REC37490 )but have not billed us yet for the sign. Minnie /Rebecca: I am working with our Landscape Architect on the items mentioned in the September 17th letter. He is coordinating with civil and will be getting back to us very soon...and in turn, we will be getting back to you soon. Thanks. -Robert »> Minnie Dhaliwal 10/23/2008 5:29 pm »> Robert, I am following up on your shoreline permit for Codiga Park. Letter dated Sept 9, 2008, informed you that your application was complete and we could proceed with the posting the notice on site. Along with that letter was a handout on the City coordination of sign process. If you have taken care of the payment with Fast Sign, please let Rebecca know that. Also, a letter requesting additional information was sent to you on September 17, 2008. We will need your response to the items listed in that letter prior to issuing decision on the shoreline permit. We'd be happy to meet to go over any questions you may have on the Sept 17th letter. Minnie No virus found in this incoming message. Page 3 of 4 file: / /C: \temp\XPGrpWise \491 C51 F8tuk- mail6300 -po 10013463351184911 \GW } 00001.... 12/17/2008 • • • Checked by AVG - http: / /www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1743 - Release Date: 10/24/2008 8:33 AM No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http: / /www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1783 - Release Date: 11/12/2008 10:01 AM Page 4 of 4 file://C:\temp\XPGrpWise\49 1 C51 F8tuk- mail6300 -po 10013463351184911 \GW } 00001.... 12/17/2008 . ;01/02009) Rebecca Fox - RE: Codiga • • From: "Erik J. Sweet, RLA" <e2_sla @comcast.net> To: "'Robert Eaton "' <REaton @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "'Minnie Dhaliwal "' <mdhaliw... Date: 10/24/2008 2:48 PM Subject: RE: Codiga CC: "'Rick Still'" <rstill @ci.tukwila.wa.us> I have met with Civil, and we have reviewed the comments. Several we can address not an issue. Several of the items were on the plan set already... for example the clearing limits, and which trees to save...We can add a tree protection detail however for that one. Some of the comments in regards to High water, mean high water, etc we do not have information as that information was not surveyed. We did get some information from Carol on High Water based upon City of Tukwila GIS information, and that information and offsets are on the plans...OHWM is show on sheet L3, and the offsets of 100' and 200' are also shown on the plans. The entire project site sits inside of the 200' offset. If this information is not acceptable, as it came from Tukwila GIS /Planning Dept, then a land surveyor will need to flag all the perntinent water information, and elevations and then have those surveyed into the current topo plan. I have a complete address of her comments combined for LA and Civil and will forward that to you shortly, I am finishing combining the two sets of comments into one. I will forward via email. Erik J. Sweet, ASLA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 www.slalandscapes.com Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. — Original Message--- - From: Robert Eaton [mailto:REaton @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:42 AM To: Minnie Dhaliwal; Rebecca Fox Cc: Rick Still; Erik Sweet Subject: Re: Codiga Rebecca, payment with Fast Signs is taken care of, they were given a PO# (REC37490 )but have not billed us yet for the sign. Minnie /Rebecca: I am working with our Landscape Architect on the items Page .1 • V1/074009) 009) Rebecca Fox - RE: Codiga • mentioned in the September 17th letter. He is coordinating with civil and will be getting back to us very soon...and in turn, we will be getting back to you soon. Thanks. -Robert »> Minnie Dhaliwal 10/23/2008 5:29 pm »> Robert, w I am following up on your shoreline permit for Codiga Park. Letter dated Sept 9, 2008, informed you that your application was complete and we could proceed with the posting the notice on site. Along with that letter was a handout on the City coordination of sign process. If you have taken care of the payment with Fast Sign, please let Rebecca know that. Also, a letter requesting additional information was sent to you on September 17, 2008. We will need your response to the items listed in that letter prior to issuing decision on the shoreline permit. We'd be happy to meet to go over any questions you may have on the Sept 17th letter. Minnie No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http: / /www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1743 - Release Date: 10/24/2008 8:33 AM • Page 2 (01/07/2009) Rebecca Fox - Re: Codiga 00 From: Robert Eaton To: Minnie Dhaliwal; Rebecca Fox Date: 10/24/2008 9:42 AM Subject: Re: Codiga V • Page 1 CC: Erik Sweet; Rick Still Rebecca, payment with Fast Signs is taken care of, they were given a PO# (REC37490 )but have not billed us yet for the sign. Minnie /Rebecca: I am working with our Landscape Architect on the items mentioned in the September 17th letter. He is coordinating with civil and will be getting back to us very soon...and in turn, we will be getting back to you soon. Thanks. -Robert »> Minnie Dhaliwal 10/23/2008 5:29 pm »> Robert, I am following up on your shoreline permit for Codiga Park. Letter dated Sept 9, 2008, informed you that your application was complete and we could proceed with the posting the notice on site. Along with that letter was a handout on the City coordination of sign process. If you have taken care of the payment with Fast Sign, please let Rebecca know that. Also, a letter requesting additional information was sent to you on September 17, 2008. We will need your response to the items listed in that letter prior to issuing decision on the shoreline permit. We'd be happy to meet to go over any questions you may have on the Sept 17th letter. Minnie • • Rebecca Fox - Codiga Farm Shoreline Permit - -(File #L08 -038) Page 1 of 1 - 0.1y4!':'COM• 7.• tofffeedINGZSIIMOMIAMI '.Y8.w/4Q•7. •. INMA 40. fIIK V1980∎1 a;b From: Rebecca Fox To: Robert Eaton Date: 08/06/2008 3:23 PM Subject: Codiga Farm Shoreline Permit - -(File #L08 -038) Robert, The Codiga Farm shoreline development application (File # L08 -038) has been found to be complete, effective 8/6/08, for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. Now it will be circulated to City departments for comments, which are due in late August. I will get back to you when I receive these comments, and let you know if additional information is needed to meet substantive requirements or to complete the review process. Thanks. Rebecca Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3683 (tel) 206 - 431 -3665 (fax) rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us file: / /C: \temp\XPGrpWise \4899C 1 D7tuk- mai16300 -po 10013463351171571 \GW } 00001.... 08/06/2008 (07/28/2008) Carol Lumb - Re: Codiga Page 1 From: Carol Lumb To: ASLA RLA Erik 3. Sweet Date: 06/19/2008 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Codiga Attachments: Codiga OHWM.pdf Erik: I'm attaching the aerial photo with the approximate location of the OHWM for Codiga Farm. Hope this helps. Carol Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Dept. of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3661 (Fax: 206 -431 -3665) »> "Erik 3. Sweet, ASIA, RLA" <eisw(alslalandscapes.com> 06/19/2008 8:58 AM »> Carol, As soon as you get a word on that water level if you have it please advise... I would like to finish those drawings ASAP for permit submittal to move this one along, and this is my hold out. Thank you for your help in this matter and your feedback previously. V/R Erik 3. Sweet, ASLA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 SLA logo 300 x 400 www.slalandscapes.com Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly {(07//28/2008)`Carol Lumb - Re: Codiga prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. 07/28/ ,O08) Carol Lumb: RE: Codiga Park Pagel From: Carol Lumb To: ASLA RLA Erik J. Sweet Date: 05/27/2008 1:47 PM Subject: RE: Codiga Park Erik: the Mean High Water Mark is typically surveyed, but maybe Ryan Larson in Public Works (206- 431 -2456) can help with a location, since surveying is expensive. It is used to locate the River, Low and High Impact Environments in the shoreline jurisdiction - in this case maybe you could locate the ordinary high water mark and call it good if Ryan doesn't have any guidance on where the Mean is located. Carol »> "Erik J. Sweet, ASLA, RLA" <eisw(aslalandscaoes.com> 05/27/2008 10:05 am »> Carol, I have all the details and sections, and specifications as well.... So many of the other items we can or will check off with no work... Plants as I said I will review, but I just followed the plants that the corps installed in the bank areas.... with a couple exceptions, Maple I think.... On the High Water Mark... do you need actual land surveyor information, as the corps left us high and dry on that, as they also did not construct the channel per the plans, hence the change in parking lot, and park layout/design More to follow, thank you and I will get stuff printed and submitted ASAP... Erik J. Sweet, ASLA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 www.slalandscapes.com Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. Original Message From: Carol Lumb f mailto :clumb(a�ci.tukwila.wa.usl Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:40 AM To: ASLA RLA Erik J. Sweet Subject: RE: Codiga Park Hi Erik: thanks for your response. The 30 day comment period begins when we send out what is called a "Notice of Application." This comes after we 07/28/2008) Carol Lumb - RE: Codiga Park r m Page 2 make the determination that the application is complete (usually doesn't take us 28 days, but if we're really busy, it might). The Notice of Application includes posting the site and mailing the notice to property owners within 500 feet of the project. When we make our official determination that the application is complete, we send out a letter (in this case it would be a memo if Rick is going to be the applicant). The applicant then has 14 days to get the notice board posted, and then we coordinate the mailing to go out when the notice board is posted on the site. Let me know if that doesn't make sense - its a lot of "process ", but required under the State law that tried to streamline the public comment and appeal process. I received a letter today from Rick on the number of parking stalls needed at the site, so you can check that off your "to -do" list. Carol »> "Erik 3. Sweet, ASLA, RLA" <eisw @slalandscapes.com> 05/26/2008 5:31 pm »> Carol, Thank you for your comments. I can and will address those comments as can. In regards to the civil, sidewalk, parking stall count etc, I will discuss with Parks. The plant species I have selected are all the same species as was planted by the corps, and I copied them from their plant lists. I will verify that list against mine, with the exception of the Maple. As that is a great Park species that causes very little issues, and disease. I again will review this with Parks. Does the 30 day comment perioed begin when the 28 days for a finding of complete application is completed, or 30 days from a public posting and could possibly run concurrent with the 28 days? As for the Mean High Water mark, that has not been surveyed after the corps, work, as the corps of engineers completely dropped the project. Same the nesting site area, we did not receive an asbuild survey of the site from the corps, so as of this moment, we do not have any real world survey data, other than the park area shown in the plans. I will review with Parks as well. Thank you for your comments, and I look forward to getting this submitted in its entirty ASAP. 107/28/2008) Carol Lumb - RE: Codiga Park Page 3 V/R Erik J. Sweet, ASLA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 www.slalandscapes.com Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. Original Message From: Carol Lumb jmailto:clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.usl Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 1:53 PM To: ASLA RLA Erik J. Sweet Cc: Rick Still; Sandra Whiting Subject: Re: Codiga Park Hi Eric: I don't know if you received the comments we provided at the Development Review Committee meeting on November 1, 2007 - it looks like you didn't, so I will summarize below as it pertains to the landscaping plan. -All plants must be native - so the Red Sunset Maple, Yellow Twig Dogwood, Flowering Current (King Edward variety), rhododendron, and spirea cannot be used. There are two native varieties of rhododendron. The native spirea needs wetland conditions, so that wont work on this site. For the Kinnickinick, either space the 1 gallon containers at 12 inches or you may use 4 -inch size plants and space them at 12 inches as well. The 4 -inch size may survive better so it would be fine with us to use that size. -The conceptual landscaping plan approved as part of the original permit showed landscaping along the street frontage of the site. -All burlap must be removed from B &B material. -The notes must specify the topsoil mix to be used and ensure that it is composed of at least 10% organic material. -The area labeled as "parking lot swale" - we need to see a detail of this area - is it being used for water quality/storm water treatment? L(07/28/2008) Carol Lumb - RE: Codiga Park If so, the notes must include the seed mix to be used in this area per King County storm water guidelines. - Please include on the site plan the location of the restoration project and the osprey platform. Construction activity will be limited during the nesting season. -Where is the boat launch? -Where will the signage that discusses the historic character of the site as the former Codiga Farm, with illustrations of the former barn building etc. be placed? -Curb, gutter sidewalk along the frontage is required. - Please provide a detail of the overlook deck. - Please provide a detail of the picnic shelter. -The location of the shoreline environments must be indicated on the site plan - River Environment, Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment. The location of these environments is taken from the mean high water mark. -Will there be signage that identifies the park? A separate sign permit is required for that. You asked about timing. A new shoreline substantial development permit is required for the work that will be carried out. That application is on the City's web site, although one was provided with the Pre - Application Checklist from the 11/1/07 meeting. When the application is submitted, we have 28 days to determine that it is complete. Once we determine the application is complete, we have 120 days to issue the permit. A public comment period of 30 days is required for shoreline permits. The number of parking stalls originally approved for the site has been reduced and so we need information that determines that the number of parking stalls to be provided will be sufficient for the proposed use. I believe Rick was going to provide that. I hope this helps - some of these comments may not be part of what you are responsible for providing, but will need to be addressed as part of a complete application, so I wanted to make sure you and /or Rick were aware of them. Let me know if you have any questions. Carol Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Dept. of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206- 431 -3661 (Fax: 206 - 431 -3665) »> "Erik J. Sweet, ASIA, RLA" <ejsw@lslalandscapes.com> 05/15/2008 5:14 pm »> Carol, (07%2872008) Carol Lumb - RE: Codiga Park Page Please see attached Landscape Plan for Codiga Park. Please review and get back to me as we are completing docuements for bidding of the park construction. We also still need to submit and adjust for the shoreline permit. Can you give me a timeline of completing that permit or process. Thank you, talk soon.. Erik J. Sweet, ASIA, RLA Principal SLA Landscape Architecture P 425 - 766 -9535 F 425 - 793 -4276 SLA logo 300 x 400 www.slalandscaoes.com Confidentiality Notice: This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) or entity(ies) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, and you are requested to notify us immediately by email or by SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC 18825 SE 164th St, Renton, WA (425)766 -9535, and delete this message forthwith. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1466 - Release Date: 5/25/2008 6:49 PM No virus found in this incoming message. '(07/28/2008) Carol Lumb - RE. Codiga Park Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1469 - Release Date: 5/27/2008 1:25 PM Page 6j STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Avenue SE • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000 June 7, 2001 Ryan Partee City of Tukwila 6300 Sou`hcenter Blvd. #100 Department of Public Works Tukwila WA 98188 Dear Mr. Partee: Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L01 -022 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 2001 -NW -40031 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to construct a side channel to restore juvenile salmon rearing habitat and park amenities including parking stalls, picnic shelter, observation deck, interpretive signage, portable toilet, and nonmotorized hand boat launch within shoreline jurisdiction of the Duwamish Riviver in the City of Tukwila, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on June 4, 2001. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day appeal period, June 25, 2001. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, 1� Marcia Geidel Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program MG:mg SDP.DOC cc: Steve Lancaster, City of Tukwila 0 Obi al J ufuu[ta Dept. Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 4 .%/)/ ‘51:eda,41 HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing 0/ee./'' Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting /a 6a / Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Project Number: /Of-- v, 3 ( Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Mailer's signature: Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice olApplication Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to ach of the addresses listed/attached //< on this �day of e1 r in the y ear 2O /� C:\D000MENTS AND SETTINGS \TERI- S\DESKTOP AFFIDAVITOF nisTRiRTrrinN_nnr I 0/ee./'' Project Name: /46/ �� /DAL /a 6a / &'49/ Project Number: /Of-- v, 3 ( Mailing requested by: /�� Mailer's signature: C:\D000MENTS AND SETTINGS \TERI- S\DESKTOP AFFIDAVITOF nisTRiRTrrinN_nnr I CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION The City of Tukwila Department of Parks and Recreation/ Robert Eaton has filed an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to develop a waterfront park with associated landscaping, parking, picnic shelter, and interpretive signage at 12529 50th Place South, Tukwila, WA. Environmental review for this project was prepared when channel improvements were undertaken (File #E01 -007). A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) was issued on May 9, 2001. FILE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project file (#L08-038 — Shoreline Substantial Development) is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development, located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite #100, Tukwila, WA 98188. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You are invited to submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Comments regarding this Shoreline Permit (L08 -038) are due by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, December 15, 2008. . If you have questions about this proposal (File #L08 -038), please contact project planner Rebecca Fox, , at 206 -431 -3683 or via e-mail at rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Persons submitting written comments will become parties of record, and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The decision related to the Shoreline Permit is made by the Director of Community Development, and may be appealed to the State Shorelines Hearings Board. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. For further information on this proposal, contact Rebecca Fox at (206) 431 -3683, rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: July 1, 2008 Notice of Completeness Issued: September 9, 2008 Notice of Application Issued: November 14, 2008 CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION �JDEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY \ ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. v (NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES On OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ('DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT (TUKWILA LIBRARY ENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES L/t A 6 ENT PLANNING DEPT A W () TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ya �_ X PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE A l ) POLICE ( ) FINANCE BUILDING D „1.,er f' ��• X PARKS & REC. () MAYOR �M /( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARI UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES OTHER LOCAL AGE ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES V (FOSTER LIBRARY 1( C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. ES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE (CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM kJ, pQ FISHERIES PROGRAM (WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\PLANNING \PLANNING FORMS\MAILING CHKLIST.DOC MEDIA ()XDUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW • • ALMOST PERFECT CONSTRUCTION ANDERSON,DONNA M BERNABEL,SIMON 6036 S REDWING ST 12533 51ST PL S 5021 S 124Th ST SEATTLE WA 98118 SEATTLE WA 98178 TUKWILA WA 98178 BNSF RAILWAY CO 2500 LOU MENK DR FORT WORTH TX 76131 BNSF RWY PROP TAX DEPT PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 BOEING EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNI PO BOX 97050 SEATTLE WA 98124 CODIGA,JAMES DACANAY,LETICIA R DEBONAIR PROPERTY L L C 12529 50TH PL S 6911 36Th AVE SW 13605 SE 173RD PL SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98126 RENTON WA 98058 DOAK HOMES INC DUNN,VERNE D ERICKSON,JOHN 11812 26Th AVE SW 12556 50TH PL S 12560 51ST PL S SEATTLE WA 98146 TUKWILA WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98178 FULTZ,PATRICK & LAUREL 12522 50TH PL S SEATTLE WA 98178 HELDE,SHIRLEY & KAREN ETAL PO BOX 91 CLINTON WA 98236 JACKSON,EMMETT L 5023 S 124TH ST TUKWILA WA 98178 GLIDDEN,DONALD L & TERESA L TRUST 17659 SE 192ND DR RENTON WA 98058 HULMAN,HUGH HOGAN 35646 14TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 JONES,DAVID R 4821 S 124TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 HARDIN,CHRISTOPHER R 12507 50TH PL S SEATTLE WA 98178 HUTCHINSON,JOHN L 830 HEARTHSTONE DR BOISE ID 83702 LADINES,DEAN S 4925 S 125TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 MULRYAN,JAMES NEWMAN,ROBERT ETAL NGUYEN,SINH V 12546 50TH PL S 341 SMITHERS AVE S 3665 RENTON AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98057 SEATTLE WA 98144 PEROVICH,CHRIS M REEVE RESOURCES LLC RIVAS,WILLIAM 19650 SE 310TH PL 7210 SE 24TH ST 12527 51ST PL S KENT WA 98042 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 SEATTLE WA 98178 RREEF AMERICA REIT CORP II PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 RUGGLES,AUTUMN J & RICHARD L 12404 50TH PL S SEATTLE WA 98178 RYAN,MARY PATRICIA PO BOX 336 RENTON WA 98057 SERAFICA,FELIPE M & MARCELINA C 12542 50TH PL S SEATTLE WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12501 50TH PL S TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12720 GATEWAY DR S TUKWILA WA 98168 Tukwila Community Member 5005 S 124TH ST TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12200 51ST PL S TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12523 50TH PL S TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12770 GATEWAY DR S TUKWILA WA 98168 WENDT,KAREN A 12537 51ST PL S TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12410 50TH PL S TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 12562 50TH PL S TUKWILA WA 98178 Tukwila Community Member 4915 S 124TH ST TUKWILA WA 98178 • city of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATON September 9, 2008 To: Robert Eaton, Parks and Recreation Department From: Rebecca Fox, Department of Community Development RE: Codiga Farm Park, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit ( #L08 -038) Your application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit was found complete on August 8, 2008 for purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. Jack Pace, Director The next step is for you to have a notice board prepared for the site. The notice board should be installed within 14 days of the date of this memo. Please have the sign prepared and installed. I've enclosed a copy of the information you received with your application materials on how to prepare and install the sign. I've included some sample language for the sign board for your review, marked with a purple flag. You must also obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. Please let me know two days before installing to notice board to arrange pick up of the Notice of Application. The installation of the notice board must be coordinated with the public notice mailing. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you must return the signed Affidavit of Posting to me. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. The notice of application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain any other necessary permits issued by other agencies. There may be permits from agencies which we have not identified. We will provide you with staff comments on the project as soon as possible. Please contact me at 431 -3683 or rfoxci.tukwila.wa.us if you have questions. Rf 1 09/11/2008 Q:\Codiaa Park — Shoreline- -1.08- 038 \Codiaa-- Notice.of.Anp.let.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: -tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us_ PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN SPECIFICATIONS Public notice signs are intended to make the public aware of land use and development actions which are being considered by the City in order to facilitate timely and effective public participation in the review process. The notice board must remain on the site from the date of the Notice of Application until the expiration of the appeal period. City Coordination of Sign Process Applicants may opt to handle the creation, installation, posting and removal of public notice board signs themselves or have the City coordinate the process. When the City coordinates the notice sign process the applicant's responsibilities are to: • Once the application has been submitted to the City and a file number has been issued for the project contact FastSigns at (206)575 -2110, located in the Springbrook Business Park at 7825 S. 180t. Street in Kent. • Provide the project site address and file number to FastSigns. • Pay a fee of $365 per notice sign required by the City directly to FastSigns. Generally only one sign is required, but large sites with multiple street frontages may require additional signs at an additional fee. • Pay FastSigns to repair, replace or reinstall any sign damaged due to weather conditions, vandalism etc. • The use of this option does not waive applicant's responsibility regarding public notice signs under City code. Once the application is declared complete the City will work directly with FastSigns to schedule the installation, posting and removal of the sign. If you have questions about the notification process please direct them to the project planner rather than FastSigns. Applicant Coordination of Sign Process Alternately, if the applicant wants to manage the process signs meeting the following criteria may be obtained from any professional sign company. Hand lettered signs are not acceptable. The applicant will be responsible for reinstalling the sign if it is made illegible, removed or otherwise destroyed prior to the date of the final Public Hearing or final action by the City of Tukwila. Failure to maintain the Notice Board in good condition is cause for the discontinuance of the review of the application until the Notice Board is replaced and remains in place for a specified time period. The applicant is also responsible for removing the sign at the end of the posting period. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ SignSpecHandout-10-06.doc October 20, 2006 State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Deparbnent of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tuk_plan@ci.tukwiia.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applicant or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \SignSpecHandout - June 2006.doc June 19, 2006 • 8" Diameter 3" Lettering, Red NOTICE OF LAND USE ACTION 1.5" Lettering PROJECT NAME: 6' FILE NUMBER: L„ 0 y:2 — r. PERMIT ACTION: 1CCi 'Yc. Leave 16" Clear for Posting Laminated Notices 1.5" Lettering TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT PLANNER AT (206) 431 -3670 Tukwila Planning Division 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 1" Lettering FIGURE 1 REQUIRED CLEAR VISION AREA NO SIGNAGE ALLOWED %pey FIGURE 2 P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SignSpecHandout - June 2006.doc June 19, 2006 FIGURE 3 P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SignSpecHandout - June 2006.doc June 19, 2006 On -Site Posting Periods Decision Type Duration of Posting Period 664 For projects triggering SEPA review , posting shall take place within 14 days after notice of the public comment period. Single Family dwellings are exerrpted. For any project requiring a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit For projects triggering SEPA review , posting shall take place within 4 days after notice of completeness until the later of (1) 14 days after the issuance of a decision or (2) the date of any administrative appeal hearing. a+ For all type 3, 4, and 5 decisions, posting shall take place within 14 days after notice of completeness until the date of the public hearing lit)ip The Public Notice Board shall be I 44 posted for a minimum of 30 days P: \Plazming Forms\ Applications\ SignSpecHandout - June 2006.doc Notice of Hearing At least 14 days prior to any public hearing on Type 3, 4, and 5 decisions open record appeal hearings on Type 2 dedsions and dosed record appeal hearings on type 4 dedsions the Project Planner shall post the Notice of Hearing on any posted notice board(s) erected June 19, 2006 Removal of Posting Board Applicant is responsible for removing the posting board in a timely manner in accordance with the time limit described in the "Duration of Posting Period" section. FIGURE 4 Applicable City of Tukwila Shoreline Policies: Goal 5.2 Codiga Park Project brings an occasion to enjoy a peaceful serene respite and educational and informative opportunity simultaneously. Various amenities that will engage both local and regional park users include a pull through parking lot, park benches and tables, a symbolic picnic shelter, informative signs, an overlook deck with interpretive signs, small grassy areas, lots of native species vegetation and an existing natural trail that leads to the sandy beach shoreline. All of which are connected by winding walkways. The overlook deck rewards park users with views into the salmon resting area. The interpretive signs mounted on the overlook deck educate park users about the fish and wildlife. The picnic shelter is custom designed reflecting the peak, gable, and shape of the historic Codiga Barn that once stood in almost the exact location. Next to the picnic shelter will be a sign board, also reflecting the shape of the former barn, which will include historic photos and information about the farming history of this site once known as Codiga Farm. One of the newly constructed walkways connects to an existing natural path that enables park users to access the sandy beach shoreline for various activities like fishing and small hand- launch watercraft. 5.2.2 River stewardship will be encouraged through the use of informative and interpretive signs that will educate park users of the necessity for such salmon habitat restoration projects and shoreline bank restoration projects through the planting of native species vegetation. Goal 5.6 With the development of Codiga Park there will be new opportunities for residents, businesses, schools and the general public to engage the river and shoreline areas. This was the frame of mind during the project design phase and is evident in the parking lot which was designed to enable a tour bus to pull through and park without being in the way of other vehicles. Codiga Park is a historic piece of land that the Duwamish River gracefully bends around lending itself to a natural paradise for fish, birds, and wildlife creating a delightful setting for passive recreational use. Codiga Park Construction L08 -038 February 11, 2009 Table 1: Baseline species richness and percent cover within the 11 sampling plots at the Codiga Farms Restoration Site, Duwamish River, Tukwila Washington. Data collected July 22, 2004. Shaded rows indicate volunteer species not originally planted. Planted sedges were Carex lynbeyi C. obnupta, and Carex stipata. At the time of monitoring, sedges were generally not in flower and thus many could not be differentiated reliably based only on leaves. Table 2: Baseline species richness and number of trees and shrubs within the 11 sampling plots at the Codiga Farms Restoration Site, Duwamish River, Tukwila Washington. Data collected July 22, 2004. PACSTRAP® is a registered trademark of Pacific Strapping Inc. Seattle, Washington (800) 255 -7478 % Cover Scientific Name Common Name Stratum 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple Tree <2 <2 Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn Western crabapple Sitka spruce Black cottonwood Tree Tree Tree Tree <2 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 <2 5 <2 Malusfusca Picea sitchensis Populus balsamifera Pseudotsug_a menziesii Douglas fir Tree <2 <2 <2 Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock Tree <1 Cornus sericea Red osier dogwood Shrub 25 5 20 Gaultheria shallon Salal Shrub 5 <1 <2 Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray Shrub 2 <2 Lonicera involucrata Black twinberry Shrub 5 <2 <2 Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon grape Shrub <2 <2 5 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum Mock orange Shrub Shrub <2 <2 <1 <2 2 Philedelphus lewisii Ribes sang_ineum Red flowering currant Shrub <1 20 15 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose Shrub 30 20 10 5 2 Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry Shrub <2 <2 <2 <2 Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry Shrub <2 5 20 10 <2 5 Carex spp. * Sedge* Emergent 60 10 Carex strata Sawbeak sedge Large barnyard grass Spike rush Herb Emergent Herb 1 <1 25 25 20 20 <1 Echinochloa crusgalli Eleocharus palustris Epilobium ciliatum Watson's willow -herb Juncus bufonius Toad rush Emergent 20 5 Juncus ensifolius Dagger -leaf rush Emergent 25 Juncus tenuis Slender rush Emergent 10 10 Lotus corniculatus Birdsfoot - trefoil Herb <1 <1 Polygonum spp. Smartweed Emergent <1 Potentilla anserina Silverweed Emergent <1 <1 Scirpus acutus / validus Hardstem / softstem bulrush Emergent 20 5 20 Scirpus atrocinctus 10 Scirpus microcarpus Small- fruited bulrush Emergent 1 25 Trifolium pratens Red clover Herb 2 <1 Trifolium repens White clover Herb 2 <1 <1 <1 Veronica spp. Brooklime Emergent <1 Hydroseed grass cover 60 Bare Ground 18 <5 40 60 65 50 60 60 70 70 Planted sedges were Carex lynbeyi C. obnupta, and Carex stipata. At the time of monitoring, sedges were generally not in flower and thus many could not be differentiated reliably based only on leaves. Table 2: Baseline species richness and number of trees and shrubs within the 11 sampling plots at the Codiga Farms Restoration Site, Duwamish River, Tukwila Washington. Data collected July 22, 2004. PACSTRAP® is a registered trademark of Pacific Strapping Inc. Seattle, Washington (800) 255 -7478 WFIEN RECORDED, RETURN TO .,C* Clerk City of Tukwila • • • •, .6200Southcenter Boulevard „.. Tukwila, WA 98188-... ••• . • STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Reference Number(s) of Related Document(s): N/A Grantor: aOnlerelsTaga 7^ ErVED FEB 11 2009' COMMLINiT1 CSEVELOPMENT Grantee: The City of Tukwila Legal Description .(Abbreviated): Portion of Lots 44-46, Biock 12., *Allentown Addition, Vol. 12, pg. 100 (Full Legal On Page 1) Assessor's Tax Parcel ID Number: 017900-2450-06 THE GRANTOR, (+0DIGA, also appearing of record as ARCHIE JAMES .•:. • .• CODIGA, a sindle.'perscik.:for .and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other 'good and valuable consideratioia/in :land paid, conyeys and warrants to Grantee, The CITY OF TUKWILA, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the following described real estate ("Property"), situated rn the COUnty,,of Kin, State of Washington. . .• . THAT PORTION OF LOTS 44, 45, AND 46, BLOCK 12, ALLENTOWN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12, ..PAGE 100, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINOTON, • LYING...SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN'OF'50TH PLACE SOUTH • . •- • DATED this 9124 day a , 2002 JAMES CODIGA, also appearing of record as Art:COIEiAMES CODIGA, A.tineeperson . . • . . • • . . . . ca)) • . • James diga ......... • STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA pAG 1 ::STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNT' OF KING � ry o .f...M N ss :I• certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JAMES CODIGA, also appearing of record as ARCHIE..JAMES CODIGA, a single person, is the person who appeared before me, .and said .person:acknowledged that he .signed this instrument, on oath stated he was authorized to execute: the.. instruuien and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes stated there* ' Dated. Ap'rr 4144 Name• i ce A,. j:leac y 1' NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of y/ Washington, residing at .Renton My cnrnrnission expires' 6-1.67 04 FEB 11 2009 roddI vivNlTI DEVEILETN dT STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA '","''v,'"C-troa,••••• • 10, 0 seet6Varrza—t-- — 01: 0 j� 011 w ir '!•• • s4t. T's C. yr st. 40Y C• r, 0sr V.) •h r r RECEIVED FEB 1 1 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '03,87,00 .... PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE i Company of Washington, Inc 01-del-No 4 L.0-44 o'D • IMPORTANT This is not a Plat of Survey It is furnished as, a convenience to locate the land mdicated hereon with reference to streets and other land No liabtlAy: is assumed by reason of reliance hereon . . STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA 20020819002321 TUKWILA 22 00 PAGE 001 OF 004 WO 08/19/2002 15.45 KING COUNTY, WA 08/19/2002 09:58 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF TUKWILA DOCUMENT RECORDING . . COVER SHEET . , Return Address: CITY OF TUKWILA Bob Baker, CMC, Deputy City Clerk Office of the City Clerk •6200 Southeenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA-98188 • 206) 433-1800 Doeuinent Tit1e(s): Statutory. Warranty Deed (Codiga to City) Parties: le James Codiga1 Other: 17/E City of Tukwila ,eitantitt../ PAGE 001 RECEIVED FEB 1 1 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF 001 Legal Description: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 44; 45 AND 46, BLOCK 12, ALLENTWON ADDITION, AS R.ECORDED IN VOLUME 12, PAGE 100i, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST MARGIN OF 50T0 PLACE SOUTH Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #'s: 017900-2450-06 �. M' 777:7 FEB 11 2009 COMiv NI FY DEVELOPMENT February 5, 2008 PYRAMID ENGINEERING LLC Mr. Ryan D. Larson, P.E. Senior Surface Water Management Engineer City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188-2544 Re: CODIGA FARM PARK - PRE07 -043 TUKWILA PARKS AND RECREATION DRAINAGE SUMMARY Dear Ryan, Tukwila Parks and Recreation intend to construct a parking lot and driveway in conjunction with a Duwamish River side channel for salmon enhancement, picnic shelter, interpretive signage for a habitat restoration project, hand boat launch and landscaping. Up to this point the U.S. Corps of Engineers provide much of the technical expertise and a majority of the funding. Please refer to the original Corps of Engineers Codiga Farms Habitat Restoration Plans and the Landscape and Civil Plans submitted with this summary. The project is located southwest of 50`h Place South, between South 125th Street and South 129th Street near the Duwamish River and in the Duwamish River Basin in Tukwila, Washington. The parking lot and driveway will consist of 9 standard stalls, 1 handicap stall and associated one -way driveway. Approximately 7,600 square feet of porous asphalt paving will be placed with this project for the driving areas. Approximately 400 square feet of porous concrete walkways will be constructed adjacent to the parking lot for pedestrian use and will extend to the northwest and southeast of the parking lot roughly parallel to 50th Place South. The ingress and egress driveways cross an existing swale that parallels 50th Place South. A 12" ductile iron pipe culvert will be installed in both driveways to allow existing runoff to continue through the swale. Most of the existing site runoff can be described as overland sheet flow towards the shallow swale which flows to southeasterly, parallel to 50th Place South. Minor portions of the project site sheet flow to the southwest, towards the Duwamish River. Stormwater flows from offsite, upstream areas are very minimal. Minor clearing and grading will be required to construct the improvements on this site. A temporary erosion control plan has been produced and if followed will substantially reduce the amount of silt runoff during construction activities. Temporary erosion control facilities to be utilized during construction consist of a rock pad construction 29015 Military Rd S., PMB #544, Federal Way, WA 98003 • (253) 852 -1164 • Fax (253) 859 -2065 entrance, catch basin protection, silt fence and a sediment trap. Sediment trap sizing calculations are attached to this letter. After construction activities are complete, and the vegetated areas are established, the contractor will remove the erosion control facilities pending the City of Tukwita's approval. In the developed condition, most minor rainfall events will infiltrate through the porous asphalt and into the base materials. Some of the benefits from utilizing porous asphalt include the removal of fine particulates and soluble pollutants, attenuation of peak flows, reduction in the volume of runoff, reduction in soil erosion, and groundwater recharge. Stormwater runoff from larger storm events will eventually sheet flow off of the parking lot and driveways into a grassed swale between the parking lot and 50`h Place South. Stormwater that does not infiltrate through the asphalt will sheet flow through a grassed filter strip prior to reaching the grassed swale, removing additional sediment and pollutants from the runoff. Stormwater detention and water quality facilities will not be constructed for this project. The City of Tukwila refers to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for stormwater guidelines and design. Based on the KCSWDM, if over 5,000 square feet of new or replaced impervious surfaces will be constructed, a drainage review would be required. The 2005 KCSWDM allows modeling of porous asphalt and porous concrete as 50% impervious and 50% grass. The site would be modeled as 4,000 square feet of impervious surfaces and 4,000 square feet of pervious surfaces, therefore the threshold of 5,000 square foot impervious area is not exceeded and a full drainage review is not required. Sincerely, PYRAMID ENGINEERING, LLC Donald Bergstrom, P.E. Managing Member Cc: Rick Still, Tukwila Parks and Recreation Till Forest 1111 Pasture Till Grass Outwash Forest Outwash Pasture Area 0.00 acres 0.00 acres 0.48 acres 0.00 acres 0.00 acres Outwash Grass 0.00 acres Wetland 0.00 acres Impervious 0.20 acres Total 0.68 acres Scale Factor : 1.00 15-Min Reduced Edit Flow Paths Time Series: Codiga -dev Compute Time Series Modify User Input », File for computed Time Series [.TSF] Codiga Farm Park - KCRTS Land Use Summary Areas used for Sediment Trap Sizing Calculations Codiga Farm Park Sediment Trap Sizing KCRTS - 15- minute time steps Codiga- dev.pks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:codiga - dev.tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Peak Flow Rates-- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.114 6 2/09/01 12:30 0.087 7 1 /05/02 15:00 0.288 2 12/08/02 17:15 0.082 8 8/26/04 0:45 0.232 3 11/17/04 5:00 0.140 5 10/27/05 10:45 0.147 4 10/25/06 22:45 0.481 1 1/09/08 6:30 Computed Peaks 2 -year peak flow = 0.114 cfs Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.481 1 100.00 0.990 0.288 2 25.00 0.960 0.232 3 10.00 0.900 0.147 4 5.00 0.800 0.140 5 3.00 0.667 0.114 6 2.00 0.500 0.087 7 1.30 0.231 0.082 8 1.10 0.091 0.417 50.00 0.980 Page 1 Temporary Sediment Trap Sizing Calculations Per 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual Project Name: Codiga Farm Park Project Number: TK- CF -07 -01 Facility Description: TESC sediment trap Step 1: Obtain the discharge from the hydrologic calculations of the peak flow for the 2 -year runoff event. 2 - yr peak flow = 0.12 cfs (see attached calculations) Step 2: Determine the required surface area as follows: SA = FS(Q2Ns) SA = Surface Area FS = Factor of Safety (2) 02 = 2 -year peak flow using 15- minute time steps Vs = Settling velocity (0.00096 ft/sec) SA = 2 x 2 - yr peak flow 0.00096 SA = 250 s.f. (Use 400 s.f. minimum trap size) 11Pyramidsllclients\Tukwila Codiga Farms\StormCalcsvTESC- trap- calcs.xls 2/5/200810:50 AM RECEIVED FEB 11 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SET -UP INSTRUCTIONS 16' x 25' STEEL FRAME BARN STYLE SHELTER ERECTION NOTES A. After application of a high quality finish and careful inspection, all members are wrapped to protect the factory finish during shipping. It is important to remove the wrapping within 7 days after receipt of the shelter. This will minimize any damage from the protective wrap and packing tape. Please handle all members carefully to protect this finish. Failure to remove the wrap in a timely manner may result in damage to the finish. Because of their size and weight it is often impossible to handle structural members without causing some blemish or damage to the finished surfaces, either in shipment or on -site. Should members require touch up, matching paint is provided. The cost of such touch -up work shall be the contractor's responsibility. B. Members and connections have been pre- fabricated as shown on these drawings; however, all of the connections may not have been pre -fit. The erector should therefore, as indicated in the AISC Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges, check for possible interferences due to warped members caused by welding during fabrication. Such minor misfits as those, which can be corrected by alignment with drift pins, are a normal expectation. Where shortages or other errors do occur, Litchfield Industries should be advised immediately so thatthey may determine the corrective action to be taken. No corrections or alterations are to be made to our products without permission. Back charges must be pre - approved before any product corrections are performed. C. All members must be properly braced until the complete structural system has been completed. This building has been designed as a freestanding, open structure. If walls are to be added, or if the building is to adjoin another structure, or if any modifications are to be made. the structure must be re- engineered prior to these modifications. D. It shall be the responsibility of the customer to engage the services of a locally licensed soils engineer to design the footings based on the actual soil bearing capacity; water table level; and specific loading requirements (seismic, snow, wind. etc.) for the proposed site of the shelter. FOOTINGS STEP 1: Lay out centerlines for the concrete footings on the selected site as shown on the GROUND PLAIN. Excavate footing holes to size, and erect footing reinforcements as designated by your local soils engineer. STEP 2: Pre - assemble the provided anchor bolt templates, anchor bolts, and 3/4-10 hex nuts. See "ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE ASSEMBLY ". Allow 2 -7/8" to 3 -1/8" of anchor bolt thread exposed above the template. STEP 3: Pour concrete piers to 4" below the finished slab elevation. The eave height of the shelter is based on a 4" concrete slab on top of the concrete piers. Any variation of slab thickness must be made downward in order to maintain the eave height. It is critically important that the tops of the piers are level and at the same elevation. Failure to achieve this will create major alignment problems for the structural steel. STEP 4: Before the concrete sets, place the anchor bolt template assemblies (from STEP 2) into the wet concrete. Align the templates per the GROUND PLAN. Alignment is critical, double check that it is correct. STEP 5: Allow concrete to harden and reach full strength (48 hours minimum) before continuing. STEP 6: Remove anchor bolt templates from the anchor bolts. Save the hex nuts for mounting columns. STEP 7: If the tops of the concrete piers are not uniform, a non - shrink grout may now be applied to a 1" maximum thickness. Allow the grout to fully harden before continuing. FRAMING STEP 1: Columns (C1). Using a small crane (or other safe means), lift, orient and lower the columns onto the anchor bolts. Orient each column with its high point (at the top) towards the center of the shelter. Align & plumb each column, and secure it to its anchor bolts using the provided 3/4" lock washers and % -I0 hex nuts. STEP 2: Rafter Beam (RF1) / Compression Ring Beam (CRB1) Assembly. Working at ground level, attach two (2) Rafter Beams to opposite sides of the Compression Ring Beam Assembly using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (S1). STEP 3: Lift the Rafter Beam /Compression Ring Beam assembly (from STEP 2) in place, centered over two opposite columns. Align the holes in the bottom of the rafter beams with the holes in the column caps. Working in the access holes in the top of the rafter beams, attach the rafter beams to the columns with the provided hardware. Align, plumb and brace the assembly. See CONNECTION (S5). STEP 4: Ridge Beam (RBI). Lift the ridge beam assembly up and position it between the two compression ring beam assemblies. Attach it using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (SI). STEP 5: Prowl Rafter Beam (PRB -L &R). Lift the prowl rafter beam assembly up and position it with one end at the Compression ring beam assembly and the other end against the rafter assembly. Attach it using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (S3. All prowl rafter beam assemblies are attached the same. STEP 6: Purlin (P1). Lift the purlin (P1) assembly up and position it between two rafter beam assemblies. The purlin (PI ) assembly has a ramp welded to it and that ramp must be positioned so the top edge of the ramp aligns with the plain of the lower roof. The T &G decking will have fall onto that ramp. Attach it using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (S3). STEP 7: Purlin (P2). Lift the purlin (P2) assembly up and position it at the ends of the rafter assemblies. The 2 purlin will attach to the bottom face of the rafter. Attach the purlin using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (S7). STEP 8: Wall Beam (WBI). Raise the wall beam assembly into position between two (2) Rafter Beams per the FRAMING PLAN. Align the holes in the wall beam end caps with the holes in the bottom face of the rafter beams. Working in the access holes of the rafter beams, attach the wall beam using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (S4). STEP 9: Wall Beam (WB2). Raise the wall beam assembly into position between two (2) Columns per the FRAMING PLAN. Align the holes in the wall beam end caps with the holes in the inside face of the columns. Working in the access holes of the wall beams, attach the wall beam using the provided hardware. See CONNECTION (S6). NAILERS, T &G DECKING, FASCIA & FELT STEP 1: Nailers. Pressure Treated Southern yellow pine 2x6(nom) lumber has been provided for use as "nailers" for installing the T &G wood deck. Nailers must be field cut to fit on the top all roof surfaces. 3" TEK screws are provided to anchor the nailers in place. Install TEK screws 12" on center on the nailers. STEP 2: T &G Decking. The T &G decking slats have decorative V- groove edges on one side. When installing the T &G, place each slat with its V- grooved side facing down so it can be viewed from inside the shelter. Lay the T &G slats running from eave edge up to the peak of the roof. Marking the center of each roof section on the top surface of the purlin nailers is helpful for T &G alignment. Start laying T &G in the middle of the roof section and work out toward the corners. Align the eave end of each T &G slat flush with the outer edge of the eave purlin. 16d nails have been provided for securing the T &G to the nailers (2 nails at each nailer intersection). Nail the T &G slats in place and cut the ends off as required. Save the cutoff drop pieces, they maybe used in the other roof sections. Refer to the T &G DECKING LAYOUT. STEP 3: Fascia. iVOTE: 2x4(nom) PT southern yellow pine boards have been provided for use as fascia. Position the fascia boards at the ends of the T &G decking boards, with its top surface flush with the top surface of the T &G decking. Miter cut the ends of the fascia as required, and secure the fascia to the T &G (and nailers) using the provided 16 galvanized finish nails. STEP 4: Roofing Felt. Roll out, overlap, cut and anchor roofing felt per manufacturers instructions. Galvanized roofing nails have been provided. 3 METAL ROOF SET -UP INSTRUCTIONS 16' x 25' Steel Frame Barn Style Shelter WARNING This roof surface is extremely slippery! Do not attempt to step /stand /or walk on this roof Use all necessary precautionary safety measures during installation of this roof. Notes: • Roof panels are labeled on the bottom side of each panel. • Panel labels & placements are illustrated on the PANEL LAYOUTS. • Screw placement is illustrated on the SCREW SCHEDULE. • It is recommended that the panels be separated into groups, and placed in an area near to the section of roof where they will be installed (per the Panel Layout). • Each roof panel has ribs along its left and /or right sides. The outside edges of these ribs are not the same. One edge is shorter than the other. • When the metal roof panels are installed, the ribs on the edges of the panels will overlap. The rib with the "shorter edge" always goes on top of the rib with the "longer edge ". • There are two types of screws for fastening the metal roof panels: 1. 1'/2" Woodgrip Screws are used for fastening the panels to the T &G wood decking. They are to be inserted on the flat portion of the roof panels, not on the ribs. 2. 7/8" LAP /TEK Screws are used to connect the roof panels together (at the overlapped ribs), and to attach trim to the panel ribs. These screws do not penetrate the wood decking of the shelter. • DO NOT install any I' h" Woodgrip screws along the eave until step 8. • DO NOT install any 7/8" LAP /TEK screws along the eaves until step 9. • DO NOT install any 7/8" LAP/TEK screws along the hips until step 10. • DO NOT install any 7/8" LAP /TEK screws at the roof peak until step 11. 4 METAL ROOF (Continued) STEP 1: Eave Trim. Measure and miter -cut eave trim to tit on each section of eave. Temporarily "tack" the eave trim in place using either the provided double -sided tape or small dabs of construction adhesive (NIC). Eave trim joints should have 3 " -4" of overlap. STEP 2: Roof Panels. Beginning in the left corner of a roof section, position panel (I A) with its bottom edge aligned flush at the eave, and its left angle -cut edge aligned with the hip centerline. Secure the panel down with the provided l'' /2" Woodgrip screws. DO NOT install 1' /2" Woodgrip screws along the eave at this time. DO NOT install any 7/8" LAP /TEK screws at this time. STEP 3: Position panel (2A) next to panel (1A) with it's left rib overlapping the right rib of panel (IA). and it's bottom edge flush at the eave. Secure panel (2A) down with the provided 1'/" Woodgrip screws. DO NOT install 1' /2" Woodgrip screws along the eave at this time. Insert the 7/8" LAP /TEK screws along the overlapped ribs, with the exception of the uppermost screw (at the hip), and the lowermost screw at the eave. (The 7/8" LAP /TEK screws at the hip and eave will be installed when the hip and eave trim is put in place.) STEP 4: Repeating the procedures in Step 4, install remaining roof panels (2A — 3A) on this roof section. STEP 5: Repeating the procedures in Steps 1 -5, install the remaining roof panels on the shelter. STEP 6: Foam End Closures. Individually, lift the eave edge of the roof panels and insert one foam end closure per panel. The foam end closures should be located approximately '/4" in from the eave edge of the roof panels. Trim as required. Repeat this for all roof panels. STEP 7: Once the foam end closures are in place, insert the required 1' /2" Woodgrip screws along the eave for each roof section. STEP 8: Panel Cover. Starting at the end of any eave. place a section of panel cover on the lower edge of the roof panels. Miter -cut the end of the panel cover to tit at the hip. Secure the panel cover to the roof panel ribs using the provided 7/8" Lap /Tek screws. Place the next section of panel cover on the eave, overlapping the first by 3 " -4 ", and secure it in place. Repeat this step on all eaves. STEP 9: Ridge Trim. Starting at the left peak, lay a section of ridge trim in position on the roof's ridge. Cut to tit at the ends. Screw the ridge trim in place using the provided 7/8" LAP /TEK screws, one (1) at each roof panel rib. STEP 10: Transition Trim. The transition trim will be put under the metal roof panels C &D. This trim is used to transfer the water from the upper roof pitch to the lower roof pitch. The opposite side of the transition trim will go over the metal roof panels A &B. Attach to T &G on the C &D side and attach to the top of the ribs of the metal roof panels on the A &B side. STEP 11: Pitch Trim. Starting at the left edge, lay a section of pitch trim in position on the pitch change. Cut to tit at the ends. Screw the pitch trim in place using the provided 7/8" LAP /TEK screws, one (1) at each roof panel rib. 5 STEP 12: Side Wall Trim. The side wall trim is to be put over the perimeter of the wall panels. The 7/W' side will cover the panel profile. Screw the side wall trim in place using the provided 7/8" LAP /TEK screws, one (I) at each roof panel rib. OPTIONAL CUPOLA STEP l: Carefully, lift the Cupola Assembly into position at the peak of the shelter. Check for plumb and alignment. Using the provided hardware, secure the Cupola in place via the built -in "tabs ". CONCRETE SLAB (NIC)* STEP l: Pour concrete slab to 4" above the footings in order to establish the intended eave height. COMPLETION STEP 1: Touch -Up Paint has been provided to cover blemishes caused during handling & construction. 6 16' x 25' STEEL FRAME BARN STYLE SHELTER (14254) DESCRIPTION QTY DESCRIPTION QTY Compression Ring Beam Assembly (CRB 1) 5 "x5"x3 /16" x 2' -8 5/8" (Beam: 2' -6 ") 2 2x6(nom) x 16' 0 "Ig SYP (T &G Slats) 120 Column Assembly (C1) -5 "x5 "x1/4" x 9' -8 9/16" (Beam: 10' -0 ") 4 2x6(nom) x 16' -0 "Ig PTSYP (Nailers) 14 Rafter Beam Assembly (RFI) 10' -8'/4" (Beam A — 7" x 5" x 3/16" x 6' -3 ") 1 req'd (Beam B — 7" x 5" x 3/16" x 6' -0 ") 1 req'd 4 2x4(nom) x 16' -0 "Ig PTSYP (Fascia) 8 Ridge Beam Assembly (RBI) 5" x 5" x 3/16" x 19' -7" (Beam — 19' -9 ") 1 3" Tek Screw (Nailers to Structural Steel) 250 Prow Railer Beam Assembly (PRB -L &R) 5" x 5" x 3/16" x 6' -7" (Beam — 6' -9") 2 Each 4 16d Nail (T &G to Nailers) (lbs) 22 Purlin Assembly (P1) 5" x 5" x 3/16" x 19' -7" (Bean — 19' -9 ") 2 16 Galvanized Finish Nail (Fascia to T &G) (lbs) 7 Purlin Assembly (P2) 7" x 5" x 3/16" x 21' -0" (Beam — 21' -3 ") 2 Wall Beam (WB1) 5 "x5" x 3/16 "x 12' -1 1/16" (Beam — I2' -3 ") — Wall Beam (WB2) 5" x 5" x 3/16" x 13' -7" (Beam — I3'-9") 2 HARDWARE: 3/4 -I0 x 71/2" B7 Threaded Rod 4 ANCHOR HARDWARE: '/4 -10 x 11/2" A325 Hex Head Bolt 64 Anchor Bolt Template - 1 1 "x 11" (w/7/8" Holes) 4 '/4" Compression Washer 72 Anchor Bolt -'A -I0 x —16"x--3" 16 3/4 -10 A325 Hex Nut 8 '/4" Lock Washer 16 '/4 -10 Hex Nut 32 Custom Laser Cut Window 2 Cupola Assembly w /Screws 1 Base Plate Covers 4 Weathervane Assembly 1 Touch -Up Paint [Frame Color] (Cans) 1 METAL ROOF /WALL PACKAGE DESCRIPTION OTY DESCRIPTION OTY LITCHTOP PRE -CUT METAL ROOF: Ridge Trim — 29ga x 6" x 6" x 10' -0 "Ig 3 Assorted Length Panels x 36" Wide 56 Eave Trim — 29ga x 5" x 5" x 10' -0 "Ig 15 I5# Roofing Felt (144' rolls) 2 1/2 Panel Cover — 24ga x 11/2" x 21/2" x 10' -0 "Ig 23 Foam End Closures (Inside) — not req'd in wall 48 Pitch Trim — 29ga. x 6" x 6" x 10' -0 "Ig 5 14ga x 7/8" LAP /TEK self-drill/tap screws (Rib overlaps & Trim) 650 Transition Trim — 29ga. x 5" x 5" x 10' -0 "lg 5 11/2" Wood Grip Screw 1525 Side Wall Trim — 29ga. x 7/8" x 2" x 10' -0" Ig 16 Galvanized Roofing Nails (lbs) 2 16' -0" O.A. Ref 36 16'- 16" 12 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: I DATE Rooster Weathervane Cupola Wall Panels (Both Sides) 8' -0" Clearance I L I 1 4" Concrete Slab By: G.C. False Window 1/4" Laser Cut Pattern (Tek /screw to Metal Panels) 7,-912„ Eave Ht. TITLE: End Elevation MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L LC rC1J ME--E_ n (apdyap= n 4 Industrial Drive . e r. ea Litchfielc, MI 49252 (517 ) 542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 1 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE Z -u' �--- - O.A. Ref -- 1 1'-4" Ref i 29ga. Metal Roof Panels C:\ / /- ^ 21'-0" f Base Plate Covers Extended Rafter Beam TITLE: Side Elevation MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L d.aI z ( . Industrial Drive 7tnit�i Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542-2985 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 2 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17 REV REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE Note: Roof decking will be 2x6nom Southern Yellow Pine T&G Slats. TITLE: Top View MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY DESCRIPTION I MAT'L ECTL 1,mba, r n Industrial Drive Litchfield. NI 49252 (517)542.2988 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 3 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17 \\ STEEL & HARDWARE SHOP NOTES: REV t. All structural steel tubing shall be ASTM A -500 Grade 8. 2. \ All other steel (plates, gussets, etc.) shall be ASTM A -36. 3. Al `l welding is to be done in accordance with latest AWS standards. All welds are to develop full strength of component parts. (E7081 Electrodes) 4. All bolts to be ASTM A -325 & threaded rod to be ASTM 8 -7. 5. All fabricated steel & structural tubes to be painted with a rust inhibitive Alkyd prirr er according to Steel Structures Painting Council (SSPC —SP2) as outlined`in AISC 6.5. ROOF MATERIAL: ,,\ Roof decking shall be 2x6nom Southern Yellow Pine Tongue and Groove slats. Optional roof materials; itch —Top pre —cut metal roof panels, 20yr Fiberglass or Cedar Shingles. ERECTION NOTES: \ All members must be properly braced until the complete structural system has been constructed. REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE NOTE: This building has been designed a a free standing, open structure. If walls are to be added, or if the building to adjoin another structure, or if other modifications are to be made, t e structure must be reengineered prior to these modifications. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION AND IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSIOIFROM LITCHFIELD INDUSTRIES, INC. AND /OR IS NOT TO BE USED IN ANY MANNER DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTEREST OF LITCHFIELD INDUSTRIES, INC. N.I.C. = NOT IN CONTRACT DET f QTY DESCRIPTION MAT'L TITLE: Shop Notes MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter \� COPYRIGHT 2005., CC- 11CC,Lo SHEET: ��Ixa 4 Indestnal Dnve ettmrn�3 4 Litchfield. MI 49252 (517) 542.2988 DRAWN BY: JES DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17\ Concrete Pier By: G.C. REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE 20-0" DET QTY 1 TITLE: Ground Plan MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter C COPYRIGHT 205\ 0 LO CHFUCCLDo 4 Industrial Drwe DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 5\ 7 DESCRIPTION °r" a MAT'L Q `(5 )542 -29882 DATE: 8 -18 -05 \ OF:17` *DESIGN NOTE All foundation design information should be considered as pre /iminory only. A local soils engineer shall be retained to design the foundation according to local conditions and codes. Final design of the footing /foundation is the responsibility of the general contractor /owner 5-x5- STEEL COLUMN (C7) REV 1 T.S. COLUMN 845E PLATE REVISION NOTE: I DATE CONCRETE FOOTING BELOW (N /C) COLUMN BASE -PLATE PLAN COLUMN DETAIL 3/4 -10 Hex Nut Typ 1111 1111 11 11 3/4 -10 Anchor Bolt Template ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE ASSEMBLY TITLE: Column Details MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter I DET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L m e ( 4 industrial Drive ta Y e Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542.2988 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 6 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17 Pitch Change P2 1 REV CRB1 S2 REVISION NOTE: DATE 2X6nom 1 &G Decking P1 P2 TITLE: Framing Plan - Top View MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L i1�[!l?J6illr` [l�lL �� VIane ,,,,. 4 Industrial Dnve d m Litchfield. MI 49252 (517) 542-2988 COPYRIGHT 2005. DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 7' DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17 1 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: DATE C1 C1 • TITLE: Framing Plan - Front View MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET l QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L L IITC[ v7 [1l , i q� 4 Industrial Drive elEm�ent7" �i Litchfield, MI 49252 (517 542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005. DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 8 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17\ DET QTY 1 DESCRIPTION I MAT'L TITLE: Framing Plan - Isometric View MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter - 7 1 srlyepe t; 4 Industrial Drive 1 e'.tr e, ; " 'i Litchfield, MI 49252 (5171542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 9 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17 CR81 REV REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE - RF1 CO\\ECTO\ (si (2) REQ'D \ FASTENERS USED © EACH CONNECTION (6) 3/4 -10 x 1 1/2" A325 Hex Head It (6) 3/4" Compression Washer Note: Hex nuts are pre — welded in place. TITLE: Connection S1 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 OTY DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L v LETrCNIFOELD V ' a, �� 4 hfteld, MI Drive t Y Litchfield, MI 49252 (517)542.2988 COPYRIGHT 2005\ DRAWN BY: JES DATE: 8 -18 -05 SHEET: Tq OF: 17\ 1 REV I REVISION NOTE: ) DATE CO\\CTO\ (2) REQ'D FASTENERS USED © EACH CONNECTION (2) 3/4 -10 x 7 1/2" B7 Threaded R (4) 3/4" Compression Washer (4) 3/4 -10 A325 Hex Nut TITLE: Connection S2 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET I QTY) DESCRIPTION I MAT'L ILI C111FaEE �] llnasc g 4 Industrial Drive V tooell4� V Litchfield. MI 49252 (517) 542-2988 COPYRIGHT 2005, DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 11 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17\ L REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE C \ \ECTO (4) REQ'D FASTENERS USED © EACH CONNECTION (4) 3/4 -10 x 1 1/2" A325 Hex (4) 3/4" Compression Washer Note: Hex nuts are pre — welded in place. Head `Bolt TITLE: Connection S3 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION MAT'L LaTcxFt: [MD e mIertgi' 4 Industrial Drive Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542-2988 COPYRIGHT 200a DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: t2 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 1T„ REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE CO \ \ECT (4) REQ'D FASTENERS USED © EACH CONNECTION (2) 3/4 -10 x 1 1/2" A325 Hex Head Bolt (2) 3/4" Compression Washer Note: Hex nuts are pre — welded in place. TITLE: Connection S4 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L v l� 4 Industrial Dnve alePtoGrrC3 Litchfield. MI 49252 (517) 542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 200x, DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: t3 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17\ REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE C1 CO\\ECTO\ (s5) (4) REQ'D FASTENERS USED @ EACH CONNECTION `� (3) 3/4 -10 x 1 1/2" A325 Hex Head \B,olt (3) 3/4" Compression Washer Note: Hex nuts are pre — welded in place. TITLE: Connection S5 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY I DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L O1.PY1e ,�,,,� (j 4 Industrial drive e Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542-2988 COPYRIGHT 2005.E DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: f4 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17\ 4 1 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE CO\\ECT o\ S5) (4) REQ'D FASTENERS USED © EACH CONNECTION (2) 3/4 -10 x 1 1/2" A325 Hex (2) 3/4" Compression Washer Note: Hex nuts are pre — welded in place. Head \Bolt TITLE: Connection S6 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET I QTY) DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L C-7 a ;If l 4 Industrial onve5 a� Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005, DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: T5 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 17\ 111 1 REV j REVISION NOTE: I DATE RF1 CO\\ECTO\ (s7 (4) REQ'D FASTENERS USED © EACH CONNECTION (2) 3/4 -10 x 1 1/2" A325 Hex (2) 3/4" Compression Washer Note: Hex nuts are pre — welded in place. - P2 Head olt TITLE: Connection S7 MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L LITCHFUU[[ ILL e �dac V Ltclhfield, MI 49252 (517) 542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005. DRAWN BY: JES DATE: 8 -18 -05 SHEET: t6 OF: 17\ 23' -8" REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE 6' -38" 1 16' T &C f Slats 6 -38" 1 21' -0" Note: 2x6 PTSYP "Nailer" boards will be provided to be screwed into the top surface of the tubular steel. The T &G boards will then be attached to the nailer boards using 16d nails. 2x6nom x 16' T &G Slat = 57 req'd per side TITLE: T &G Layout MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter 7 COPYRIGHT 2005 4IndustnalDnve DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 17 7 tdements- etibcaoe f DET J QTY DESCRIPTION MAT'L ' ; `'j 1 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE 8 8 2D 2D 0 2D 0 2D 3D TITLE: Panel Layout - Roof MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L d cap 1I 4 Industrial Dnve G eleme 1 Litchfield. MI 49252 (517) 542-2988 COPYRIGHT 2008\ DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 1\ DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF:8 \\ 1 REV Inside Face 2 Req'd REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE Outside Face 2 Req'd TITLE: Panel Layout - Gable Siding MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L COPYRIGHT 2006\ LIIYC li F 'f ELt a DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 2\ tSndx f 4 Industrial Drive e Roe Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542 -2988 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 8 \ • 1-1/2" Woodgrip Screws (Deck Fasteners) 14go x 7/8" LAP/TEK Screws (Trim & Overtopping Ribs) Panel Cover Eave Trim Eave Trim Pitch Trim Transition Trim 1 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: ( DATE 2 1/2" --i --t — H 2 1/2" ®• • FASTENER DETAIL Panel Cover Eave Trim i' -8" •• • •• • • I .r,. L ■ • I I • i • L • . • 1 • I 1 1 •1 L • 1 1 1 1 L • 1 1 •1 1 1 • 1 • 1 ..I. r • I I •'L I .I, •• I • •A 21' -0" I _ I Panel Cover [(JET 1 QTY TITLE: Screw Schedule - Roof (Panels A & B) MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter COPYRIGHT 2005 LE -TrY- 7 DRAWN BY: DES SHEET: 3 f �� � 4 Industrial Drive DESCRIPTION MAT'L I LMi tCeld, MI 49252 1 (517) 542-298B DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 8 • 1-1/2- Woodgrip Screws (Deck Fasteners) 14ga x 7/8- LAP/TEK Screws (Thin & Overlapping Ribs) Panel Cover Ridge Trim REV REVISION NOTE: ] DATE 2 1/2" --I -I- -- 2 1/2" • AL • FASTFNFR APIA/! Panel Cover TITLE: Screw Schedule - Roof (Panels C & D) MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter � COPYRIGHT 2005 �' DRAWN BY: JES SHEET:4 Drive 1 eiti e.3 t Ltcth etc. MII 49252 �DET QTY DESCRIPTION MAT'L (517)542.2988 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 8 • 1-1/2" Woodgrip Screws (Deck Fasteners) 14ga x 7/8" LAP /TEK Screws (Trim & Overlapping Ribs) 1 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE Side Wall Trim 2 1/2" f---2 1 /2N • • • FASTENER DETAIL Side Wall Trim Side Wall Trim Panel Cover a8. Side Wall Trim TITLE: Screw Schedule - Gable Siding (Panels E & F) MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter COPYRIGHT 2005 '-(s) DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 5 ywAtze. 4 Industrial Drrve DET 1 QTY I DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L `itc 15171 542-2988 2 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 8 Pre —Cut Metal Panel Tongue & Groove Decking Roofing Felt REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE Rafter Beam Fascia Board ROOF ASSEMBLY DET 1 QTY I DESCRIPTION Panel Cover Eave Trim Inside End Closure TITLE: Roof Assembly Detail MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter COPYRIGHT 2005 =n �cy(r�!r,fL'!5, DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 6 x ct a Industrial Drive MAT'L 1 elerr;; 1, Utcnheld, MMI :9252 DATE: 8 -18 -05 ts, �� saz.2sae OF: 8 6" 5" RIDGE TRIM SAVE TRIM PITCH TRIM IS 5" 5" 1 REV 1 REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE 11" „ PANEL COVER 2 7/8" 1 TRANSITION TRIM SIDE WALL TR /M IDET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L_ TITLE: Trim Details MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter term. t1, 4 Industnal Drive Y GlGf11GrtGY- 1 Litchfield, MI 49252 (517) 542 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET: 7 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 8 Metal Roof Panel 1 REV REVISION NOTE: 1 DATE Pitch Trim Transition Trim 2x6nom T &G Slat Metal Roof Panel TITLE: Trim Layout Detail MODEL: 16' x 25' Barn Style Shelter DET 1 QTY DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L �' vv I�T�1zy� jl a Industrial Drive C e, ` Li1Chfilc, M.I x9252 (577)5.2 -2988 COPYRIGHT 2005 DRAWN BY: JES SHEET:8 DATE: 8 -18 -05 OF: 8 Note: Tabs are installed into one half to assure a tight fit. Both halves attach to the column using a self - tapping, screw. Note: Once the base plate covers are installed, run a bead of clear silicone around the top edge of the base plate cover where it meets the column. This will help prevent water from getting into the base plate cover. 1 REV REVISION NOTE: Thru hole for attachment Tobs Rubber Scratch Guard Protector 1 DATE TITLE: Installation Page MODEL: Base Plate Cover IDET 1 QTY 1 DESCRIPTION 1 MAT'L COPYRIGHT 2008 4lnaustnaIDrive DRAWN BY:BEW SHEET: 1 L4el MI (5,chfi7) a542 -2998 , 49252 DATE: 2 -28 -08 OF: 1 Date: 15 June 2002 MSC: Northwestern Division District: Seattle District SECTION 1135 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1. PROJECT: Codiga Farms Intertidal Restoration Project State Congressional District - 09 2. LOCATION: The proposed project is located in Tukwila, Washington, in King County, approximately 10 miles south of Seattle along the Duwamish River. See attached location map (figure 1). The Duwamish River estuary extends from the mouth of the river to River Mile (RM) 14. The name then changes to the Green River and extends another 85 miles to the headwaters in the Cascade mountain range. The Codiga Farms pr..oject.is located at about RM 10. A map of the project area is included as enclosure 1, a picture of the site is included as enclosure 2. 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. The purpose of the proposed project is to restore tidal and riverine hydrology to the site in the form of an off - channel slough, estuarine marsh and riparian buffer. The project would improve overbank storage, increase the shoreline length, provide improved estuarine habitat and improve flood plain inundation. The project would create 830 linear feet of side channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish such as chinook and chum and create a small '/z acre estuarine marsh, which will provide important primary productivity and nutrient export In addition, the project would provide approximately 1.6 acres in riparian and upland planting to provide cover and support wildlife. A perimeter fence will divide the habitat restoration features from the park to help minimize human traffic into the restored area. A proposed path will also help minimize access into the restored area and provide maintenance access to the restored area. The project would also include recreational and educational improvements on an existing 1.15 -acre municipal park. Amenities would Include interpretive signage on habitat restoration and 1•:istorical uses of the area arr observation platform, paving of a parking lot and installing concrete on a portion of the path for wheelchair access. Project components include: • excavation of two adjoining sloughs (25,000 cubic yards) • placement of rock at the entrance channel and to support slopes (156 cubic yards) • large wood debris with root wads (about 40) • placement of gravel on the channel bottom (250 cubic yards) • creation of an intertidal marsh (about 21,500 square feet and excavation of 13,000 cubic yards of material • perimeter fencing to allow for plant establishment and controlling duck and geese access to the site • interpretive signs • an observation platform • a small covered picnic area • seven picnic tables • A portion of the gravel path will also serve as a hand boat launch area:. • Riparian, upland and marsh plantings An existing barn will be demolished at the site and a small community garden (pea patch) and parking area will be realigned to accommodate the habitat restoration project. How Existing Corps Project Would be Modified. The existing project at Howard Hanson Dam and upstream levee projects would not be directly modified for this project. The project seeks to restore tidal and riverine hydrology, which has been adversely effected by the construction and operation of Howard Hanson Dam and levee projects. The following discusses some of the impacts of the federally authorized and other projects in the basin as well as history of the site under consideration. Basin Impacts The construction of the Tacoma Diversion Dam (in 1910 at RM 61), Howard Hanson Dam (HHD constructed 1960, RM 64), and numerous levees along the river have reduced the migration of the river within the middle and lower basins, affecting sediment transport; and reduced inundation of a significant portion of the historic floodplain. The HHD flood control operation eliminates flows sufficient to cause large -scale shifting or reconfiguring of the channel. Levees confine the river in numerous locations. Except for an area of braided multiple channels near O'Grady Park (RM 36.9 to RM 40.6), much of the river has assumed a single channel configuration. The Corps has constructed levees in the Middle Green River as well as Howard Hanson Dam in the upper basin. Diminished channel length, reduced shoreline length, and considerably less estuary characterize the existing channel conditions in the middle and lower basin today as compared to conditions at the time of European settlement. The following table summarizes some of the physical changes in the system. Additional information on hydraulic changes in the system can be found in the August 2000 Preliminary Restoration Plan. Table 1=1. Selected Parameters of the Green/Duwamish Basin Parameter % Change (from pre - Pre- settlement 1936 1994 settlement to 1994) Basin Area 1,640 sq. miles* 483 sq. 483 sq. miles ** -70% * Duwamish only miles ** ** Green only River /Stream Miles 1,900 miles 580 miles* 380 miles* -66% Accessible to Fish 83 miles ** 125 miles ** -93% * three basins combined ** Green/Duwamish only 2 Estuary Area 3,950 acres' 298 acres 45 acres -99% Channel Length2 61 miles3 55 miles 50.6 miles -17% Shoreline Length 152 miles 121 miles 111 miles -27% Channel Width4 Unknown 277 feet 195 feet -29% (between 1936 and 1994) Notes: 1. Estimate includes tidal flats, tidal marsh, and tidal swamp. 2. Channel length is calculated for the Green/Duwamish River only. The estimate is from the estuary to the approximate downstream limit of the Green River Gorge at main RM 47.4. 3. Estimate includes some 21,000 feet of the Duwamish straightened during filling of the estuary and approximately 55,000 feet of braided channel and sloughs lost in the middle valley. It is a compilation of information from USGS maps and aerial photos and is an estimate of the maximum active river length for the period 1892 to 1936. 4. Estimate is a comparison of six cross sections within a reach in the middle Green River Valley between the Neeley Bridge at RM 35 and the Whitney Bridge at RM 39. Alteration of the flow regime by HHD and the various diversions of the river's original flows have affected the river in another significant way. Historically, when flows inundated the adjacent floodplains, floodwaters seeped into the floodplain, recharging the water table. This water slowly drained toward the river over the year, supplying small floodplain streams, side channels, and the mainstem of the river with cool flows through the summer low flows. Without floodplain inundation, this process cannot occur, and floodplain streams and side channels dry up earlier in the season. River temperatures may also be affected by the loss of cool groundwater inputs during the summer low flows. • Reduced flows have also reduced water supply to the banks and geomorphic surfaces within the active channel. This has reduced overbank storage and affected riparian growth. Reduced soil moisture conditions have been found to lower the growth rate and survival of typical riparian plants. Ultimately this leads to a reduction in riparian width and the eventual replacement of typical riparian plant species with species tolerant of drier conditions. Site History and Impacts. The proposed project seeks to restore some of the habitat losses in the lower Duwamish. Historically, this portion of the Duwamish had a broad and connected flood plain. Within the tidal portion of the flood plain existed estuarine marshes and sloughs. Starting in the 1860's levees were constructed at the marsh edges and these areas were converted to agricultural production such as hop fields. The broad fertile flood plain of the Duwamish attracted many immigrant dairy farmers at 3 the turn of the 20th century. Archie Codiga moved into what was then called Allentown from Switzerland in 1910 and established a dairy farm. The site has been maintained as a farm "since then,'while=many of the adjacent farmland was then converted to hoiuging-or industry. Prior to 1860, the Duwamish was a flat, meandering river with tidal influence. The Duwamish Estuary was an extensive marsh of over 4,000 acres. This transitioned into a brackish marsh, saltmarsh, and mudflats on the farthest edges of the delta. The main channels were largely unvegetated mudflats and sandflats. Patches of eelgrass were likely present in the saline areas. The historic Duwamish Estuary in the lower basin was largely a detrital -based system and provided significant food and habitat for both terrestrial and marine organisms. Juvenile chum and chinook salmon frequently foraged in sand flat and marsh areas. These prime estuarine wetland and intertidal rearing areas for chum salmon converted high detrital carbon inputs from freshwater flows to forms usable to salmon. These forms included significant insect and crustacean populations in the marsh on which juvenile salmon feed. From a fish and wildlife standpoint, this conversion had harsh consequences. Flow regulation at Howard Hanson Dam, the construction of levees and placement of fill that was put along the margins of the tidal portions of the river interrupted the flow and as a result, nutrient export from the marshes to the adjoining habitats such as mudflats was diminished. Intertidal sloughs that were once refuge areas for juvenile fish (salmon, sculpins, and sole) shorebirds (dunlin, sandpiper and yellowlegs) and waterfowl (pintail, and baldpate) was lost. The continuity of the large interspersed habitats of the estuary became fragmented. This project offers an opportunity to restore some of the former estuary. Alternatives. Four alternatives were evaluated during the combined planning and design study. The following section addresses the measurement of environmental outputs, a description of each alternative and an evaluation of the alternatives based on costs and benefits. An economic evaluation of the recreation project components is also presented below. Environmental Outputs and Costs. Environmental outputs for the altematives include a quantitative measure of estuarine marsh, riparian buffer and estuarine slough length created under each alternative. Also under consideration is the overall quality of the habitat created. For the scale of project under consideration, this is a qualitative measure to take account of habitat complexity and species diversity as defined below. • Habitat complexity: An interspersion of highly productive and varied habitat types is proposed for this project. This will allow for greater species diversity within the project area than is currently available. More of the life history needs (such as reproduction, feeding and rearing) of this diverse population will be able to occur within the project site which will lessen the need to disperse to other habitats. This will lower predation and expenditure of energy (increase in fitness). 4 • Species Diversity: Sometimes referred to as Biodiversity, it describes the -variety of life forms, the ecological roles they perform and the genetic diversity they contain. For this project it is consideration of more than a single species approach. That is, by excluding exotics and invasive species from the project area, benefits (food, refuge or reproduction) will be provided to a variety of organisms. Each of the alternatives under consideration was rated high, medium or low for habitat quality in context of diversity and complexity. Habitat Restoration Alternative Evaluation. The following table summarizes the components and costs of each alternative. The costs in the table only include construction costs, and do not include contingency or S &A. A description and evaluation of each alternative follows the alternative summary table. An incremental cost evaluation provides information to assist in selection of a preferred plan. ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION Table 1: Alternative Outputs and Cost Alternative Estuarine Slough (linear feet) Estuarine Marsh (sq. feet) Riparian Buffer (sq. feet) Municipal Park (sq. feet) Habitat Quality Cost ($1000) No Action 0 0 4,000 50,300 Low $0 Minimal 630 0 4,000 50,300 Low- $784 (5,040 sq ft) .. Moderate Mixed -use Habitat & Recreation 830 21,500 83,700 44,000 High $883 (Preferred) (6,640 sq ft) Full 1500 43,000 126,000 0 High $1,464 Buildout (12,000 sq ft) 5 • The no action alternative. The no action alternative maintains the current condition and serves as the current baseline condition. For comparison purposes the no action alternative includes 50,300 of parkland, 4,000 square feet of vegetated. buffer and 126,700 square feet of degraded riverbank, for a total area at 181,000 square feet or 4.15 acres. • The minimal alternative. This alternative would include excavation of one small slough (630 linear feet multiplied by an 8 foot bottom channel width) or 5,040 square feet) and no estuarine marsh. All interpretive and recreation features (covered picnic area, observation platform picnic tables and parking lot) would be included. For the alternative evaluation, recreational amenities were preliminarily estimated to cost $44,100 and restoration features $740,140. The total restored habitat area is 9,040 square feet, which includes the 5,040 of estuarine marsh and 4,000 square feet of riparian buffer. The cost per square foot of improved habitat area under this option would be roughly $81.86 ($740,000 divided by 9,040 square feet of improved habitat) per square foot. In addition to the high per unit cost of restoration, this option provides only minimal improvement to habitat complexity and opportunity for species diversity • The mixed use habitat restoration and recreation alternative. This alternative proposes to excavate two adjoining sloughs totaling 830 linear feet (6,640 square feet), creation of a 1/2 acre intertidal marsh (21,000 square feet), and 1.6 acres (83,700 square feet) of riparian planting. This alternative slightly decreases the size of the existing park and provides for educational and recreational amenities. Cost shared recreation features include the interpretive signage, a concrete trail to the observation area, covered picnic area, and parking. Recreational features are preliminarily estimated at $44,100 and include the same elements defined above. A gravel trail will also be provided from the parking lot to the river's edge to provide maintenance access to the restored area, the gravel path will also provide viewing access to the restoration features and serve as a boat launch ramp. This alternative would result in the creation of 111,840 square feet of improved habitat area. The total habitat restoration costs for this option are $839,500, which would be about $7.50 per square foot of improved area. • The full build -out option. This alternative would convert the entire property into intertidal sloughs and estuarine marsh while retaining none of the recreation or interpretive amenities. This alternative creates the maximum habitat benefit area, nearly a fifty percent increase over the mixed -use plan. This plan would create 12,000 square feet of estuarine slough, 43,000 square feet of estuarine marsh and 126,000 square feet of riparian buffer. Total square footage of improved area would be 181,000 square feet. The cost of this alternative is estimated at $1,464,000 resulting in an average cost per square foot of $8.09. The cost increase is primarily due to significant increases in the quantity of material excavated, bank stabilization material and plantings. The table below presents summary information from the incremental cost evaluation. The alternatives are first sorted by average cost per output, those plans which produce lower levels of output than the plan with the lowest average cost are eliminated from further consideration. In this case the mixed -use alternative has the lowest average cost per output while the minimal alternative has lower output but a higher average cost per output, as such the minimal alternative is eliminated from consideration. The next step is to compute the incremental costs per incremental output for the remaining alternatives. Alternative Evaluation Table 2: Incremental Evaluation for Restoration Alternative Total Restoration Costs (X $1000) Total Habitat Restored _ Average Cost per Output Incremental Cost per Incremental Output No Action $0 0 $0 n.a. Mixed -use Habitat & Recreation (Preferred) $883 111,840 $7.50 $7.50 Full Buildout $1,464 181,000 $8.09 $8.40 Minimal $740 9,040 $81.86 Eliminated from evaluation Based on the cost effectiveness and incremental evaluation, either the mixed use plan or the full build out plan is incrementally justified. Although the full build out alternative provides the greatest increase in improved habitat, approximately a 32% increase compared to the mix use plan (137,000 square feet under the mixed -use plan compared to 181,000 square feet) and the incremental costs per output are not substantial, the added implementation costs of this option are not judged to be "worth it ". In addition, this limited evaluation does not include the value of the loss of the park. Additionally the non - federal sponsor is not willing to support a habitat restoration project that would include the loss of the park. Based on this evaluation the federally recommended alternative and the alternative supported by the non - federal sponsor is the mixed -use plan. 7 Recreation Evaluation. In accordance with EP 1165 -2 -502, recreation components of ecosystem restoration n projects must meet several criteria. They must be economically justified; cannot increase the overall ecosystem project cost by more than 10 %, cannot impact or reduce the restoration outputs and must be provided on the lands needed for the basic ecosystem restoration project. Exceptions to the last criteria are where lands may be needed for parking, public access and health and safety features. Costs. The recreation features that are proposed for inclusion in the Codiga farms project include signage, parking improvements, picnic tables, a picnic shelter and a viewing platform. The preliminary cost estimate for these items is $44,000. Average annual costs based on a 50 -year project life and the federal discount rate for 2002 of 6.125% are $2,840. Benefits. The Unit Day Value Method (UDV) was used for the economic evaluation: This method assigns a value per use based on the willingness to pay of users. The value is determined based the overall recreation experience at the site, the availability of other similar recreation opportunities in the area, the carrying capacity of the site, the site accessibility, and the esthetic value of the site. Based on the generalized scoring system in EGM 01 -01, the existing condition score for the site was assessed and determined to be 15 corresponding to a general recreation value of $3.53. With the project in place the score increases to 48 which corresponds to a value of $5.85. The City of Tukwila does not track annual usage of the existing site, however use information is available for the Pea Patch at the site. This information combined with estimates for expected increases in park usage can be compared to recreation costs to determine the projects economic viability. The existing site use under current conditions is primarily by individuals who use the existing pea patch. Based on use over the past five years, an expected 20 individuals will participate in the pea patch program. Based on this information, it is assumed that at least 20 individuals will visit the site an estimated 10 timesper.year fora total annual use of 200 days. This will serve as the existing condition usage estimate. Based on this information, the usage is multiplied by the existing condition value of $3.53 to arrive at the annual recreation value of $706. Park usage is expected to increase with the added recreational amenities at the site. Existing pea patch program participants are expected to continue using the project, but the unit day value will increase for these individuals. New users to the park are also expected. If we assume that the added amenities to the park would attract 15 additional users per week between May and October and an additional 2 people per week between November and April the total annual user days is 642. This usage multiplied by the increased value with the project in place of $5.85, results in a total annual value of $3,755. 8 Based on this information the net annual increase in value over the existing condition is $3,049: This figure represents .a conservative estimate-of recreation project benefits. The benefit figure is divided by the annual costs to arrive at a benefit to cost ratio. The benefit to cost ratio is calculated to be 1.1. The proposed recreation amenities at the site are economically justified. Project Benefits. By restoring flood plain connectivity and intertidal habitats (i.e. small blind channels, mudflats, intertidal marsh) a variety of benefits could be expected. The following are three of the most important considerations: • The Codiga Farm area would be restored to a more historic condition. By doing so, both primary and secondary productivity at the site would be increased. By restoring habitat types that produce the basic food sources (such as organic carbon, detritus, and benthic and epibenthic organisms) at the base of the food chain, the benefits will be realized throughout the trophic structure. This restoration would also facilitate nutrient exchange as well as provide better fish access. • As a result of restoring several habitat types (mudflat, tidal slough and marsh) and establishing functional connections between the watershed and estuary, the restoration work would also significantly increase the species diversity at the project site. Many of these species are sensitive species or are currently in decline in the region due to development and loss of habitat. • Also as a result of restoring a complex and interconnected system, the restoration work would provide better support at critical life stages to the more diverse species assemblages that could now utilize the site. These life stages include reproduction, rearing, feeding, refuge, immigration, and emigration. The site also offers one of the few off - channel refuge areas during high flow events in many miles. Target species that would most benefit from this potential project include many species of fish, birds, and mammals. Fish species include juvenile sole,. sculpins, stickleback, chum salmon, chinook salmon, and cutthroat trout. Bird species include geese, goldeneye, coot, gadwall, bufflehead, merganser, great blue heron, green- winged teal, killdeer, mallard, sandpipers, dunlin, goldfinch, juncos, osprey, redtail hawk, bald eagle, redwinged blackbird, and song sparrows. Mammal species include river otter, raccoon, and muskrat. The increase in shallow water habitat would probably benefit chinook and chum salmon the most and these important species have been in serious decline in the Puget Sound basin within the past few decades. Puget Sound chinook has been listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. The following table describes the physical changes in habitat that can be expected if construction is completed. 9 Table 1 -2 Project Habitat Benefits Physical Change in: Pre - Project Condition Post'Project Condition Estuarine Marsh 0 21,500 sq. feet Riparian Buffer 4,000 sq. feet 83,700 sq. feet Estuarine slough length 0 linear feet 830 linear feet Importance of the proposed outputs. Specific species that would benefit include the Washington State sensitive species such as great blue heron, the federally threatened species American bald eagle, and significant species that are regionally in decline such as dunlin, goldeneye, and gadwall. The project site would provide overwintering habitat for the common merganser and nesting sites for the spotted sandpiper. Several salmon and trout species would especially benefit from this project as well. These include the threatened Puget Sound chinook, and chum salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. If residence time is increased due to the feeding and refuge opportunities afforded by this project, the salmon would be larger and more fit as they migrate to the ocean. This would increase their survival rate during their long migration prior to spawning. Many salmon species in the Northwest are currently in severe decline and have been petitioned for endangered species status. Currently chinook is listed and bull trout is proposed for listing. The wild stocks of salmon and trout in Duwamish/Green Basin are but a small fraction of their historic numbers. Relationship of proposed project to other projects and plans. Several agencies have been working cooperatively to restore the Duwamish estuary. There is currently a Coastal America demonstration project within the estuary. This demonstration project was completed in late 1994 and is similar in scope to the potential Section 1135 project in that it too involved the removal of material to restore the shoreline to its natural shallow water habitat. This new project that is being proposed under Section 1135 would further develop the partnerships fostered in the original demonstration project and would benefit from the lessons learned. Additionally, working with King County (under the 1135 prograni).and the Port of Seattle (under 206 authority), two other estuarine habitat projects have been constructed further down stream. This project would have a cumulative beneficial effect for those projects. The Codiga Farms project is a "spin -off, early action project" of Seattle District's ongoing Green/Duwamish Ecosystem General Investigation Study (G.I.). The Codiga Farms project received one of the highest project rankings of any of the projects evaluated in the G.I (over 50 projects were evaluated). This project is consistent with the goals and objectives established in the G.I and address many of the limiting factors of habitat productivity that were established under the G.I. (estuarine loss, off - channel feeding and rearing opportunities for juvenile salmonids). Lands, Easements and Rights of Way (LER). Approximately 4.13 acres of land is required for the proposed Section 1135 Project. The city of Tukwila, one of the two Non - Federal Sponsors already owns fee interest to 4.11 10 acres of which 3.10 acres of fee interest is necessary for the proposed restoration project, with an estimated value of $147,000. Washington State-Department of Natural Resources (DNR) a co- sponsor owns the additional 0.02 of an acre in public trust, necessary for the proposed restoration project, which it will make available for the project. The value of the DNR land is considered nominal. Access to the site is from an existing public road. During construction the City of Tukwila will also make available 1.01 acres for a strip of land between the public road and a portion of the permanent Section 1135 project site for a temporary staging area, with fmal further improvement to a section of this area for construction of a parking lot as part of a recreation feature outside the Section 1135 permanent project footprint. Since there is no loss in utility to the ecosystem project if the parking lot was not built or a loss in utility if the recreation feature is built without the ecosystem project, the parking lot is viewed as a stand -alone item that the City could choose to relocate in the future if necessary. So the City will only receive credit toward its cost -share requirement for the temporary work area easement, including the parking lot area within the temporary work area footprint for the purposes of the Section 1135 project. The estimated value of this temporary right is $7,000. See the project drawing for the location of these items. Following is a summary of the estates and estimated fair market value by each estate proposed for implementing the Section 1135 project. TABLE I ESTATE Fee Temporary Work Area Easement (15 months) Subtotal Contingency 25% TOTAL ACRES 3.12 1.01 4.13 4.13 ESTIMATED FAIR MARKET VALUE $147,000 7,000 $154,000 38.500 $193,000 (rounded) Real-Estate Baseline Cost Estimate Before advertising for project construction both the City of Tukwila and Washington State, Department of Natural Resources will need to certify their LER available for construction. See Table II below for the real estate cost estimate for this proposed project. The cost includes an estimated fair market value of the lands to be provided for the project and administrative costs for certifying their LER available and any acquisition costs, (e.g. incidental acquisition costs, such as title, survey, appraisal costs, negotiations, recording fees, legal fees, etc) if the lands were acquired within a five -year period of the date the Project Cooperation Agreement is signed. The Federal review and assistance costs are estimated at $12,000 and include providing Non - Federal Sponsors with LER requirements, review of appraisals, coordination meetings, review of right -of -way documents, legal support, crediting activities, etc.). 11 TABLE E-ll FEATURE CODE 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES Lands and Damages $193,000 Non - Federal Sponsor's Costs 28.000 Subtotal of Sponsor LER Credit $221,000 Federal Review and Assistance Costs 12,000 TOTAL LER (includes 25% contingency) $233,000 4. CONSISTENCY STATEMENT: The project modifications would be consistent with the authorized Howard Hansen Dam project and would in no way adversely impact the project. 5. VIEWS OF SPONSOR: The city of Tukwila will act as the non - Federal sponsor for cost - sharing purposes for this project. Washington State, Department of Natural Resources also acting as a non - Federal Sponsor with limited participation to only providing their LER. The city has expressed a strong interest in and commitment to restoring the biological productivity of Codiga Farms. Their letter requesting assistance, dated January 25, 2000 is attached as enclosure 4. The city and Washington State and the Department of Natural Resources are in agreement with the project as described in this fact sheet. The City of Tukwila is in agreement with the estimated implementation cost and has set aside funding for the project in their capitol improvement program budget for 2002. By letter dated 28 February 2002, the sponsor has outlined their understanding of their responsibilities under the program, including cost - sharing and agreement with the terms of the PCA, and indicates their continued support for the project. 6. VIEWS OF FEDERAL, TRIBAL, STATE, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES: There is strong interest in and commitment to achieving the goals of this potential restoration project amongst state and Federal resource agencies. During project development and planning, District staff worked closely with representatives of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to identify and address cultural issues relating to the property. Tribal representatives participated fully in the Green Duwamish General Investigation study under which the Codiga Farms 1135 was initially proposed. The Tribal representatives also participated in the decision to go ahead with Codiga Project under the section 1135 program, and not the larger Green/Duwamish Ecosystem Restoration Project. Tribal fisheries staff were consulted during the preparation of the EA and FONSI, and offered no comments during the public comment period. Seattle District Staff archeologists surveyed the site for native artifacts, and coordinated the finding with both the Tribe and the SHPO. To date, the Tribal representatives have provided continued input, and have not given written indication of unanswered concerns. Seattle District ERS will continue to coordinate with the Tribe during the construction and monitoring phases of the project. 12 7. STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE: This project is compliant with all applicable regulatory requirements. An Environmental Assessment, 404(b)(1) analysis, water quality certification, Coastal Zone consistency and a Biological Assessment have been completed for the project. Under section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Nationwide permit 27 applies. The FONSI was signed 4 September 2001 and the HPA was received 23 July 2001. Endangered Species Act compliance is being met through the Programmatic. Biological Assessment (June 2000) prepared for the Green - Duwamish Ecosystem General Investigation Study. Concurrence letters for the Codiga Farms Project were received 10 April 2001 from the NMFS and on 10 March 2001 from the USFWS. All environmental compliance is complete. 8. COSTS AND BENEFITS: The benefits associated with implementation of this project will outweigh the project costs. The project will result in ecosystem benefits to a variety of organisms and increased biodiversity. The recommended plan is the NER plan and the plan supported by the non - federal sponsor. 9. SCHEDULE: Begin Planning and Design Complete Planning and Design Sign PCA Contract Award (Sponsor In -Kind) Complete Construction Complete Monitoring 1 December 2000 5 March 2002 30 July 2002 10 August 2002 15 July 2003 30 October 2007 10. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: • In -kind Services. The local sponsor has indicated that they wish to perform V; limited ip- kind.seyices, in the form of materials an_ d,equipment.,This effort is estimated to be $146,000. • Monitoring. There will be monitoring associated with this project. Monitoring is needed to ensure both biological and functional effectiveness. Monitoring will be focused on the factors that are targeted for improvement. In years one, three and five we will monitor: plant survivability (percent cover), fish use (primarily juvenile salmon), prey resource production, and cross sectional area at the mouth of the slough where it meets the Duwamish River. Estimated monitoring is expected to be $45,000 total for the project ($30,000 biological and $15,000 physical). Note the monitoring cost represent about 3% of the total budget. Additional documentation on the unique demands for monitoring can be found in the August 2000 Preliminary Restoration Plan. Approval for the additional monitoring was provided in earlier documentation. _ • Co- sponsor. A deviation to the model PCA is being requested. A portion of the entrance channel is under Department of Natural Resources (DNR) jurisdiction. The City of Tukwila and the Washington Department of Natural Resources will 13 act as non - federal sponsors. The DNR parcel is estimated at 0.02 of an acre (640 _.square.feet),_more or less as documented on :Plate G72, of the project.drawings based on 2' contour information. Design and construction requirements specify that the channel must extend from elevation 0' to —2' (N.G.V.D., 1929) and be of sufficient width to allow for construction and maintenance of the backwater channel and re- vegetation of the area. • Project Costs. The project will be conducted through an equipment rental contract, District Emergency Management staff has reviewed the project cost estimate. • Technical Documentation. Additional project documentation related to the hydrologic design of the project, HTRW investigations, and geotechnical evaluation is available at the District. • HTRW Investigations. HTRW investigations found that a portion of the barn removal (lead paint on the milk barn, and asbestoscon.several windows) and soil removal related to a waste oil spill are not eligible for cost sharing in accordance with ER 1165 -2 -132. The Corps has estimated the amount not eligible for cost share is $17,000. The sponsor as an in -kind contribution will complete barn demolition and disposal. The sponsor will be required to demonstrate to the Corps that all CERCLA hazardous material has been removed from the site, including confirmation sampling of the soil. • Financial Capability. The City of Tukwila, the project sponsor for all financial considerations, has demonstrated their financial capability to implement the project. The City has set aside $100,000 in their 2002 budget to meet their required cash contribution and to fund several work -in -kind items to be contracted. The remainder of the non - federal share will be comprised of work -in- kind, performed by in -house staff and provision of necessary real estate. • Historical Preservation. As indicated by a MOU signed by the Corps and the SHIPO, Historical documentation of the barn is required. Estimated costs for this item are $13,000 and will be a 100% federal responsibility in accordance with the provisions of P. L. 93 -291, the Archeological and Historic Data Preservation Act. • This project was a congressional add for FY00. 11. FINANCIAL DATA: a. (all costs in thousands of dollars) Project Costs Federal Funding Needs Totals Non -Fed Federal FY01 FY02 FY03 FY+ Planning and 158 158 158 Design Construction Restoration 1186 336 850 400 445 5 Total 75%/25% 1344 336 1008 Recreation 50/50 52 26 26 26 Historic Pres./00/0 13 13 13 HTRW 0 /100 17 17 Total Project 1426 379 1047 158 413 471 5 Note: Projects with a Federal cost of $1,000,000 or less will have a combined entry for planning and design instead of separate report and plans and specifications rows. b. Non - Federal Requirements: LER $221,000 Cash $ 11,900 In Kind Services $146,000 Annual OMRR&R $ 2,000 c. Fully funded Cost Estimate: The fully funded cost as found in the PCA is estimated to be $1,426,000. 12. FEDERAL ALLOCATIONS TO DATE: Feasibility: $158,000 Plans and Specs: $0 Construction: $0 15 -CITY . _.-` . ' TUKWILA Codiga Perrin Project site 1 6 17 . 1827Q0 N 19,S..•4/ 557i E 55.11470, 5,7.710. W14i.101050 7(00.4• 0. 7474 000 FE. 04141,, 6 ....,. SIT f0000 114., 1140. (07.14 7041 0514 .00T, • 3 ps:CH Ws( At \ -11R000 , FA; r 74E ',..<7', 1- )% 117.17110 1•101 • 47j1. • rtmr 000 45.1511 75740411.2 4.111* PflOO APLOR C.1:1,001 Sitr-fi 505 1...111.47 .7(5077,10, naurCy; La; vTx LTT LaLER • - !4744' .451 044.11 48' F•07,011. 7.4 411 - • •11. (•10,175.51 40015 5.01 05 1,010; 5010 1.0 11,01- 0, 004411'lCT,R I7t.L 700410 1151 41044074400* 141tiLla. 71...r71005 1114077*0 004 AVZ.RatErat rx,,,ANTii.1.414.111 41 4 .041/.1747 0004404. 4040000000 177041.7014 • VAL. v7'10:.. 000171101 5417C ,a5 47 • PtfluC CLEU 1.0(.4.0.0 j40 1114*00(1444 0400. 0141, 010.tre 0.4.1,171441 FEFOESETIL0Tr.4. 10004 4111 4 10744. 145000. 0. T.r1 Eis,10 4E7780 004 1.1E114 3, 7444 2074 '1074084,, 004*0 4200, ('0 E704041E u4100441; • 70 E401,00 1I001031! 440E A ,.. 14.001 PS 10 E 10.,1110117 00 0, EFEE Ova1OP 10 CIAa r. • CT 147! FLCSEE nub • I, TET TY CT 01710.1000300 0410. 841 .006050 :0040•710 0001104E47 047(7441. 0110, 070011 50 50174ay usto .47 cceisTkrral TTELEFL 14411075 S-.T.LL EL O1140740 CL, 1, ANCP 011141E2 • 1 eka 04570 71.0E00 TO ETT 01014 0717LE7 MT. !FT ALE 13 L044 400 az.. 1144404(0007 ATE 111.041 rwrcs 47 400 4410 Ea.: 41 EuTLLt. 0. 706. 71F. 01000 CLEvATI. 40 43. , • V,10,1,1 (4411100 0(4 40 74E0 0040' 44 TL.S 4A4.74. 7000784; C10IOI410:49 0011 04111E LEFTS Ca ILE 54,11,4 UN: 00 TPS C.C!..LFET FwiFooLT 440744 140 0.:1737 110 T..4 044860 lo 44 .414.81 144*0111I4. 00.82110 000041 4270 L541140,0 !ALLA TS ,:OLRLFTEI .t.CO'FFEALKC 01111 (11(PC. Or/ or T,10... 5044)r.181,014 14E RAM C-1 1110 OrTAILS. CT .E1..1.4 1 01q,1.. 4O4. CON1..1 P%. I •407 ..7E0,4 C.C( .400 C.15,57, 0.01 5 .5 TE P ONS.BiL T. \ r2. STTECT LL,CaT■Oel er...lf.EnT TO 01E44144 El-lraLELKEO CM SITS 1E0 P6('4 TO i;,aapLIti0 401.743 00. 10 rE FEL, 00,0,441141.007 AT WAWA., Estuarine Marsh .5 acres 1 0.1,1 00 Met 0,0111. al:. 71,0 ...t/00'.17, :,00:0104.155.4.5. DRAFT r • Ly mu., 10 417: E. Tut, 1441 US APIIT mama OISTECT. SEATTLE 070000P INGIEEILS StATALWAloCT. 1.00440 70715 1100114, F.E.071;10.7 91T PLAN 71.7 a-1.77 705514004 • 1 .7.11 7-7 1 1 CITY OF T ^ TCWILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -App File No.: itt E. Date Received: 10 1 -7-0 1 Meeting Date: 11- (- O'7 Time: 22 2)0 ?; Pre - Application Project Summary King County Assessor Account No(s): -' "' li)O 5s" r Project Name: C I CLie -rn 5 Site Address: �J Description of Proposal: ROPOSPsI_ FO(_, P et124 N GI CAn Anticipated period of Construction: Will this project be developed in phases? ❑ Yes If "yes" please describe: + Ct' From: S121Y1 SW1AL>✓ Pf21& 2UCB No To: Fc ( 2COS Are there any existing or proposed easements on the site? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes" please describe: Building Information Current Assessed Value of Building by King County: $ Value of Proposed Project: $ Total Square Footage of Building: NI A NIA- Type of Construction per 2003 IBC: 1 Please indicate the square footage of each floor, broken down by building use(s). Use additional sheet if necessary. FIRST FLOOR Building Use Occupancy Classification Square Footage SECOND FLOOR THIRD FLOOR Number of Parking Stalls: Existing: Proposed: Standard: Standard: to Fire Protection: Existing: ❑ Sprinklers Proposed: ❑ Sprinklers Compact: Compact: ❑ Automatic Fire Alarm ❑ Automatic Fire Alarm IA None 1l None Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? Handicap: Handicap: 1 ❑ No Cgi, Yes If "yes" please describe: Contact Person Contact Person: Mailing Address: E -Mail Address: 1< -■'C1"T 1c3S 25 SE., 164 -I-tr, St- RI Q , 97iY g _5W C 51 -ALAM SGA-PC-S. C;OYV1 Q:WpplicationsWotms- Applications On Line\3 -2006 - Pre- application Fonn.doc Page 1 of 2 Revised: 12 -2006 Phone: M2 - -7LDLP -�'t5 3� Fax No.: 1-125- 1 2-7 (1 CITY Of UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Pre - Application Checklist The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. BUILDING DIVISION The following is meant to be general information related to the requirements of the Tukwila Building Division for the processing of building permits. Specific code issues will be addressed through the normal plan review process after the permit is applied for. 1. Comply with the International Building Code (IBC), 2006 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. ❑ 2. Comply with the International Residential Code (IRC), 2006 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. ❑ 3. Comply with the International Mechanical Code (IMC), 2006 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. ❑ 4. Comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2006 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. ❑ 5. Comply with the International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC), 2006 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. ❑ 6. Comply with the Washington State Energy Code, Chapter 51 -11 WAC, 2006 Edition. Energy code specifications and data must be included on the building plans. g7. Comply with IBC requirements for barrier free access, Chapter 11, Appendix E, Supplementary accessibility Requirements, and ICC /ANSI A117.1 -2003, American National Standard. 8. Comply with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, 2005 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. ❑ 9. Comply with IBC Chapter 12, Section 1207 Sound Transmission. ❑ 10. Comply with the 2006 Edition of the Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code. El ? 11. Plans submitted for approval must be stamped by a Washington State licensed architect or engineer and shall specifically contain the name of the person designated as the architect or engineer of record for the project. This person shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinating all submittal documents prepared by others, including deferred submittal items, for compatibility with the design of the building. (See IBC Section 106.3.4.) ❑ 12. Rockeries proposed as earth retaining structures are not permitted over 4 feet in height, unless the design, supporting calculations and specifications are prepared by a licensed design professional registered in the State of Washington. A geotechnical report, and special inspection shall be required. 13. All retaining structures over 4 feet in height OR retaining structures (of any height) that support a surcharge shall require a separate building permit. ❑ 14. The installation of rack storage fixtures more than 5 feet 9 inches in height will require a separate building permit. Rack storage fixtures more than 8 feet in height shall be braced to resist displacement or overturning due to earthquake events. The design of the bracing shall be prepared by a registered design professional, and shall be in accordance with ASCE 7. ❑ 15. Construction documents shall include special inspection requirements as specified in IBC Section 1704. The architect or engineer's inspection program required by Section 106.3.4 shall be included with plan submittal documents when permit application is submitted. Notify the Building Official of testing lab hired by architect or owner prior to permit issuance date. The contractor may not hire the testing lab or special inspectors. \dre \bldglist.doc Updated: 2 -25-05 B1ILDING DIVISION Page 2 of 2 Pre - Application Checklist File No.: PRE07 -043 ❑ 16. Structural observation shall be required as specified in IBC Section 1709. ❑ 17. A foundation soils investigation will be required. The written report of the investigation shall include information outlined in IBC Section 1802.6, and shall be prepared by a registered design professional, licensed in the State of Washington. ❑ 18. Separate demolition permits are required for removal of any existing buildings or structures. ❑ 19. Addresses are assigned by the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. Buildings shall have approved address numbers in accordance with IBC Section 501.2. El 20. Obtain approvals and permits from outside agencies: ❑ ELEVATORS are regulated by State Department of Labor and Industries. Permits and inspections for elevators are obtained through the elevator section of that agency (reference RCW Chapter 70.87). Phone: (206) 248 -6630. ❑ PUBLIC POOLS /SPAS AND FOOD SERVICE FACILITIES - King County Health Department must approve and stamp plans prior to submittal to the Tukwila Building Division. Phone: (206) 296 -4787. ❑ FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM plans are reviewed through the Tukwila Fire Department. Phone: (206) 575 -4404. 21. All sets of construction documents and related specifications that are prepared by a registered design professional, for building permit application, shall bear the stamp and original signature (wet stamp) of the design professional. ❑ 22. ❑ 23. ❑ 24. ❑ 25. ❑ 26. ❑ 27. ❑ 28. Checklist prepared by (staff): / //S('2P1 Date: /0;j %C7 P: \Permit Center \Preappllcation forms \Checklist-Bldg 7- 2007.doc Updated: April, 2006 CITY OF 'UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 , Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us No Lomm&NTS Pre - Application Checklist The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. FIRE DEPARTMENT - Construction Information 1 The City of Tukwila has adopted the 2006 International Fire Code. This and other nationally recognized standards will be used during construction and operation of this project. (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.16) 2. Fire hydrants will be required. (Tukwila Municipal Code 14.24) 3. Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by the Water Department, and fully in service prior to start of construction. By line of vehicular travel, a fire hydrant must be no further than 150 feet from a structure; and no portion of a structure to be over 300 feet from fire hydrant. (Tukwila Municipal Code 14.24) 4. Automatic fire sprinklers audible and visual devices are required for this project. Sprinkler system and fire alarm shall comply with N.F.P.A. #13, #72, and ADA requirements. Sprinkler plans shall be submitted to Washington State Surveying and Rating Bureau, Factory Mutual or Industrial Risk Insurers for approval prior to being submitted to Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. The fire alarm plans are to be submitted directly to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. Submit three (3) sets of drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.42) 5. Maximum grade is 15% for all projects. 6. An addressable fire alarm system is required for this project. (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.40). Plans shall be submitted to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval, prior to commencing any alarm system work. Submit three (3) sets of complete drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. 7. Special installations of fixed extinguisher systems, fire alarm systems, dust collectors, fuel storage, etc. require separate plans and permits. Plans to be submitted to the Fire Marshal prior to start of installation. (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.16 and 16.40). 8. Portable fire extinguishers will be required in finished buildings per N.F.P.A. #10 (Minimum rating 2A, 10 BC). 9. Buildings utilizing storage of high piled combustible stock will require mechanical smoke removal per Chapter 23 of the 2006 International Fire Code. 10. During construction, an all- weather access will be required to within 150 feet of the building. (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.16) 11. No building will be occupied, by people or merchandise, prior to approval and inspection by Fire and Building Departments. \dre \firelist.doc 10/22/2007 FIRE DEPARTMENT Pre - Application Checklist File No.: PRE07 -043 Page 2 of 2 12. Adequate addressing is required. Fire Department will assign all new addresses. Number sizes will be determined by setback of building from roadway. Four -inch numbers are minimum. Numbers will be in color which contrasts to background. (International Fire Code Section 505) 13. Designated fire lanes may be required for fire and emergency access. This requirement may be established at the time of occupancy and /or after the facility is in operation. (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.16) 14. Special Fire Department permits are required for such things as: storage of compressed gas, cryogen's, dry cleaning plans, repair garages, places of assembly, storage of hazardous materials, flammable or combustible liquids or solids, LPG, welding and cutting operations, spray painting, etc. (International Fire Code Section 105) 15. Fire Department vehicle access is required to within 150' of any portion of an exterior wall of the first story. Fire Department access roads in excess of 150' require a turn around. Fire Department access roads shall be not less than 20' wide with an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13'6 ". (Tukwila Municipal Code 16.16) 16. Adequate fire flow availability will need to be demonstrated for this project. 17. Checklist prepared by (staff): ^'` Sl I Date: "--/- ° 7 \dre \frelist.doc Updated: 7 -2007 CITY or 'UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Pre - Application Checklist odiga> Farms 592 50 =Pi The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.„c„,,x✓ /, 74 e sp y , rav4 , ,-, Z, d,.//4,)71 V « 4/74:7 4.)L.K9 0 ? Checklist prepared by (staff): \dre \pollist.doc Updated: 2 -25-05 Date: /5;�7 CITY Or - UKWILA (� rrvami Department of Community Development - Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Sinorr tans 5,40 s 11.1M-1 W iie. LL A& A PoNvi-ut. 5 Ae-h 'J.e1.:i pavvv- d - LO ■ - d ZL s1aze -ii .t PQv1 L 4^ Lot -a23 iMC i . 5'Z Laa,,,a(s c -Maa.. Pre - Application Checklist Pre- Appli'c'ation'i tMeetingiDatelan Time 1i1= Tr The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PLANNING DIVISION - Land Use Information 1. Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) 2. Obtain the following land use permits /approvals: 3. 4. 5. ✓� 6. d7. 8. ❑ 9. d 10. ❑ 12. n 13. ❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ Binding Site Plan Improvement Plan Boundary Line Adjustment /Lot Consolidation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Design Review Environmental (SEPA) Planned Mixed Use Development Planned Residential Development Rezone Zoning designation: tZ 2 Shoreline Management Permit Tree Permit Short Subdivision Sign(s) Subdivision Unclassified Use Variance Other: Site located in sensitive area? [j Yes Minimum setback requirements: Chr }v`' Front: Zb Second Front: Side: 5- Rear: 10 ❑ No Maximum Building Height: 3O � Height exception area? ['Yes K No Minimum parking stalls required: 44- - Handicap stalls required: `" 4- As cte.iamvv•r. A b; Se ee.0 -i. P .21✓mtisAle. ?a✓ ✓vr�N {,/�� 2 1 — m xui tQ ` n1.fl r•Vt'Ab / dAt-ji t.U0 ✓Gt rtiii �,Q„ p A/c.-Q.--U- 6: teA%hu7wk. r/Vbt•yto No more than 30% of required parting stalls Fray be compact. No landscape overhangs into compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hitting the curb will be required. Minimum landscaping required: NIA-`ve �'�ti`r' f�`' "`e`er Front: S Second Front: i Side: 10 Rear: N' 4-. Minimum interior parking lot requirements: Ni IA- Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). Roof -top mechanical units, satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. Trash enclosures and storage areas must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. Building permit plans which deviate from that already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re- application for design review approval. I‘ASTv•iic, t50A5 Z kilu dam(, -fit, Owm.av t-- c,aeft-A5 et- Fa -1►-1 ar So'te. Checklist prepared by (staff): Date: \dre \planlist.doc �� i, G�J�U l5 i1 kS Updated: 2-25-05 k 5 ,. ( � � {'S i !' tq,avii0i / enp - *mt_ 19A4.41 L i v-u' r �„/) ►?A 5 � 1 nevrare vl v � Sra�i k ,� ��'tiGicro�lA ,� L4.1 a� o� ,ka,rtAA1 CITY Of - UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Pre - Application Checklist Pre - Application File:`No;r, .PR`E07:-043; Meeting Date and'Time:: l`1°-v0t @:2:3011 The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Visit www.ci.tukwila.wa.us for the Tukwila Municipal Code, Public Works Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards and Customer Assistance Bulletins. es 1. This project is subject to traffic concurrency analysis. Contact the Public Works Sr. Transportation Engineer, Cyndy Knighton at 206.431.2450. 2. Provide water/ sewer/ surface water/ concurrency notices. For surface water concurrency contact Ryan Larson at 206.431.2456. For water and sewer concurrency contact Mike Cusick at 206.431.2441. 3. Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals through the City's Permit Center: ❑ Type A Short Term Nonprofit El Water Meter (Permanent) ❑ Type B Short Term Profit ❑ Water Meter (Deduct) g Type C Construction ❑ Water Meter (Water Only) ❑ Type D Long Term El Street Vacation ❑ Type E Potential Disturbance ❑ Developer Reimbursement Agreement ❑ Type F Blanket ❑ Turnover ❑ Flood Zone Control ❑ Other: Fl4. Site plans must be prepared by a registered civil engineer. Sheet sizes: Minimum 14" X 17" and Maximum 24" X 36 ". ' 5. Provide survey data using NAD 83/91 and NAVD 1988. * ** *NOTE ** *Public Works WILL NOT ACCEPT any other datum for public infrastructure. 6. Water District Cl"Of or -rVK.uudi Sewer District CrN' of —11/KW/ LA Drainage Basin 7. Provide water / sewer availability (concurrency) letters. 8. Water assessment $ Sewer assessment $ Assessments will be determined during the Public Works plan review process. 9. Provide King County /Metro Sewer Use Certificate. 10. Pavement is less than three years old and can not be cut. 11. Pavement mitigation fee appl' to this project. Estimated remaining pavement life %. Charge per square foot of cut $ \dre \pwlist.doc 10/22/2007 PUBL;C WORKS DEPARTMENT Pre - Application Checklist File No.: PRE07 -043 Page 2 of 2 12. Transportation mitigation fees, based on information provided, will be (Ordinance 2111). 13. For Flood Zone Control Permit, provide elevations converted to 1929 NGVD. The finished floor elevation for buildings in a flood plain must be at least 1' above the 100 -year flood elevation per FIRM maps. Critical facilities shall be 3' about 100 -year elevation. 14. Provide surface water design per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. Surface water drainage plan must be by a registered civil engineer for all projects that do not meet the Small Site Drainage Review criteria in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. Infiltration Restriction Level 2 Detention Required 15. Provide erosion prevention and sediment control per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. 16. The Geotechnical report must include riverbank stability analysis when a project is adjacent to the Green /Duwamish River and the natural riverbank is expected to provide bank protection for the life of the project. n17. Provide a sight distance analysis per the most current edition of AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design. 18. The maximum allowable slope for access roads and driveways is 15 %. Commercial driveway access shall be 25 -35 feet wide. Residential driveway access shall be 10 -20 feet wide. A residential driveway must be paved for 20' from the property line. 19. Provide applicable easements and maintenance agreements: 20. Provide backflow prevention on: domestic water, _ fire, irrigation lines. 21. Frontage improvements (TMC 11.12) required include: 'Z OTZ'(; /NCt -vD /NG Cu1R.i err+ . S17,610i lac # r Lia 'riiJc NOTE: ublic Wor s WILL ONLY ACCEPT NAD 83 91 and NAVD 1988 N 83/91 for public Infrastructure. 22. Undergrounding per TMC 11.28 applies to this project. n23. Provide turnover documents for constructed infrastructure, which the Owner will transfer to the City of Tukwila. Turnover packet enclosed. 24. Complete enclosed Business Declaration and return to King County. (Stamped SAE provided) 25. Contact King County Water and Land Resources Industrial Waste Program for a Waste Discharge Permit of approval. Provide a copy of the approval. Additional Comments Attached. Enclosures: Checklist prepared by (staff): C4401,11 Date: l ///07 \dre \pwlist.doc Updated: 2 -25-05 CITY OF TUKWILA 'am o igHORELINE Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 (Q3AI Eh gg Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 �� Jl� E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwilawa.us RECEIVED FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P- SHORE Planner: e (; C CA ro X File Number: L.0 g - 0'5 g Application Complete (Date: 63 16 I o e) Project File Number: me-61- py 3 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: e-0 t _ 001 NAME OF PROJECT/DE VELOPMENT: Co I) Evi A 9414. (9( LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. /Z SZ J 5bv' l . S- 7uk -u9 it*/ p$1(!2 . -� 14 ltiat®✓ty� n o T i, S FCC LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may he found on your tax statement). - O1/9oo2/5o DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 577 LL- Address: 1 V.4' *x q Z I° JF S 17- ak_. (Au 1.64 i e - Phone: - (Q 3 91 E -mail: r54-1-11 Q_clatilwi Ic , V■14 SUS Signature: FAX: P Whthni.g fours Plica kmitchuro-6 -06 Jx; Date: Drum,, 4 2Q06 TREES TO PROVIDE _ SHADE FOR CHANNEL NATIVE PLANTS (TYP) CHANNEL ALIGNMENT WETLAND PLANTINGS LWD WETLAND PLANTINGS HAND LAUNCH - _.LOCATION 2 OHW \ EXISTING GROUND SURFACE 3' PROJECT PLACE LWD AT •CHANNEL OUTLET ' LARGE ROCKS TO BREAK UP FLOW "kil. BENCH .I 111 \• EL 14' 1 I I I i I I I 11 i 1t (i I 1 1 1 -, � 1 `I II/ I , I I( tit \ \ BACKWATER \ 1 CHANNEi\ 2i 1 1 \ \, \ i . 4 \ \\ \ \ 1 \ \ ‘ \t\ `' TOP OF '' BANK \ \ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ i �... \ -'• •.• - ▪ ti \ /..-.�' "" /.... -'.' .- \ \\ 12.5 . ` . \. \ . %.' Y \ •' 6' 6' WIDE PCC '-WALKING PATH \ \\ N. �._ \A \ PICNIC \ SHELTER KENT TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTION NOT TO SCALE PARK .LIGHT IPOLE FENGE.CTYP) HISTORIC `` INFORMATION~` 0 / \\......° ' %I / "'"•'/r ^ " \ \4.. ' (rte -~... .. BERM (TOP EL. 20', "•• • - - --.._ 4H: IV SLOPES) NOTES: I. PROVIDE WARNING SIGN AT END OF TRAIL. CAPTION TO READ: 'CAUTION: WESTWIND WEIR 1.5M1 DOWNSTREAM.' \ TOE-OF PLQOD' OW BERM - - -r FLOW CODIGA FARM BACKWATER CHANNEL SCALE: I' = 100' . • • 100' 50' 0 I. 3 100' (Yi N H N1-1 100' 200' \Ci 40 O 30 a 20 W 10 INVERT EL 7' I0 z 0 > W 40 30 PRELIMINARY QUANTITY ESTIMATE ', '- QUANTITY r S.. ' EXCAVATION 21,500 CY GRAVEL 1,100 CY ROOTWADS 16 EA LARGE STONES (12"-18") 20 EA CONCRETE 25 CY FILL 650 CY 20 — - - — - IO / % - - -r - - - - - -- -__ -__ i __ -__ —_ _ —__ —_ _— _ _ _ PROPOSED BACKWATER INVERT EL 0'- 5 =0.7X CHANNEL PROFILE BACKWATER CHANNEL 2- PROFILE BASIN MAP NOT TO SCALE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE --- }--- - - --I- 1 • — T�--- -_I__. 1 -10 O O 0 INVERT i 4' O O BACKWATER CHANNEL I- PROFILE O O N UND SURFACE INVERT EL 3' 0 O O 0 0 STATION DATE AND TIME PLOTTED: 20 -APR -2001 17 :08 DESIGN FILE: I:Odes'gnsOmsgdOelvfcodlqa.dqn O N ° + PROPOSED POND OUTLET CHANNEL PROFILE O O STATION o 0 0 co U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE CORPS OF ENGINEERS SEATTLE, WASHNGTON GREEN /DUWAMISH RIVER - HABITAT RESTORATION CODIGA FARMS BACKWATER CHANNEL KING COUNTY WASHINGTON umumw na. D f01 w 033.. DAF root, van 0IMAR20 ,utc —• %.;,cast r.. rr rl I i I I' I 1 I, I 1 i• I — i • • 3 -Q e3 r, r'• 6 1 vl U N h Q N r. / C(40 J I 0 -(.>0L 9 1 0 sco cZ I Q 3 ,n , g I v 1 Z I .. cry off 'TVW,LA i415TOt lC lNP0 60A1LDs CarlC6 PTO At_ (LW (244-ri 0 .J 5 / C 02'b A CA0-w4 S /'%c CA-14-4"./EL x Codiga Farms Side Channel Map Legend // 2' Contours N A 50 0 50 100 Feet Date: March 21, 2001 Photography Dated: July 6, 1999 ! SEATTLE s ` �•� 1 M1C/H ■\ 6 ®111b6' • 1PY KING COUNTY SEATTLE CC City of Tukwila Comprehensive This is a graphic representation of land use designations adopted by City Council 12/4/95. Larger maps that show property lines, : designations, and other zoning information are available at Tukwila Department of Community Development 41 ii t17, ungitsj 11111:' 1 " II, v; I l� III r!. \ y • '0 •jN 1000' Atom Pfto .lEET scrE SEATAC Comprehensive Pl�n Desianations LDR- ow Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential HDR igh Density Residential 0- Oft)ce MUOrMixed Use Office RCC- Residential Commercial Center NCC- Neighborhood Commercial Center RC- Regional Commercial RCM - Regional Commercial Mixed Use TUC - Tukwila Urban Center C /LI- Commercial Light Industrial TVS- Tukwila Valley South LI -Light Industrial HI -Heavy Industrial MICL- Manufacturing Industrial Center /Light Industrial MIC /H- Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial Overlays and Sub Areas rr� ��-'. �' kill 1'II11iafI1111IIIi!IIIII: ;..im: ! I i 1 r;��'�!11!11IIIllll� ,:.19 a11111111111111 x:11111= min r InIcal FM11111311111= i3! IG�AII11M!�.:111r11nr 1ul= ..fl :,1111tife"Bh.;L�i'i111;= /iIl'!11111.1 11:1 -11111= tit !In iii ' Illt 111111_- 1111Iz /--;; :cm DR ,, ,;.,-" 111M11 L 1112"" 'i 1111!' i, --i- U - -: , -; Public Recreation Overlay Shoreline Overlay r!.% (Approx. 200' each side of river) 1 Manufacturing Industrial Center Boundary I,. Tukwila South Master Plan Area Tukwila Urban Center Potential Annexation Area c, ream:, 1 16/1HST 6 Ifni ST 11 -L. 1-- w CC It, 1 t it f i4 SWORD ST !4 ■ KENT 1' • "1 JJ • /J ''r'' 4# 1 R ,y • ,a JLi¢ 4oa• er , , /Y.L'J d,4Lw A "vtS n i ,7 4s L7; • .!. a� a 44 i 0 ,f Lo - L, Lt L7 7. L4 1.4 ,f JJ tit a: 4144' I0 \ •2 1• r_ 100 6 pq, .1 d/0 e,i770 ',. -I. L, 22 u ,‘O 05 a as .1 J /QO0-. 12 '41J P e nsf•=a\+ e i 3... .�� :I* j �1- �•I - /,- c,, ;,1r I I.i J ,;L. LI t) L. 26 L(. L, a L7 u. ;'.101 711 a. JL 7 Ja ,. , 4•.. '. 1 "i rA r �f \ \ 6= .' • \\ 125TH. N, owaaer \ 7 \ \ .7f coo .Z 8 ar• 00 . CQNFOCM3 ,o Net Ja-�7` J 582.34 -11E 564.05 PCL. B 7 s.ltA0 / 00j0 / /'%1 8904120877 /�,• ,L.ds TUY -SP B9 -1- SS . Q' /EN.� /0 / /7,4 \ �, ;�:1: N yet a1 -.. aJ.JS ea A . 6 5 6 J' -Liv6 (.r V01• d °9 F as /'212110 Fd- /0 9 r. :7•,2-5 �K a�•a'4�~`0� •7 SJ rut. e 7., •• . to 12--nes GO m114 Soo' vF TL(E s ATE. \ *4r \ \ \ \ \\ t \`s 1,9 `!a L \ J �fy . wd \ "A. \ 1 ....... / S. \ ' .' ,.+, 44 \ , / . V b. 100,Y EAR FLOOD ''6 \ �•' .•'/ r b- ELEV.. - la,5 (F. E.M. AI %� .' .' ° . . ..- / / .- /' b. aY / .' r/ /' Fence TOP OF BANK :' ��/ �. `k / . Too / b. \ \ ‘ ." ..• t. \ \\ /' .' t \ ' ' / / \ . ' \ \ / / / \ // /•- // Y � w / ' / / \ // 11 1 \ �` J / /''/ /• • „ / / . a.s.w Or Aep PLAT NOTE: BOUNDARY LANDS EXTEND SEYONA PLAT BOUNDARY ABUTTING LOTS 36 TNRU 44. SEE NOTE ON SHE T 2 REGARDING OWNfR- SNIP RIVEEWPRD OF F•AT BOUNDARY. `',r. / . \,. \ \ \ /• O �/ s \(>° / . \ \ / / `'.r. \ \N \ ./ /. `o \ �� \po '5 \ .' Y' /' \\ \ \ ur / e 'Dr. \ \ \ MI \ , \r " / /' ' n.w \ "` • `00 // f 'L / aw e' \( /..'' .' /Woad I \ / / e e Fence t&' \ e. // 1 \4 \ / . 1 ` \ /' 1' / -' / / Top . ./' ' ILO \ .' / \ / .." . LANE OF ORDINARY NIGH WATER VEGETATION LINE HIgh rater line Xun us \\ \ . ' y! PL. Ant ;11.1'i) .. ! :,. -..T71 It: I ; .. AU. EN7'0:;' Rte4Mi.);:•∎O T/TAX caw TI.=iCATIE 2.E OBTAINED TO DISLO:E ,F VACATED AND VCRIFY OWMCRSNN' ALSO RIGN OF WAY POR O7i1 AC•t, It $I1 WN ON =- S FReIWAY RIGHT v# WAY MAPS PER STI,T= 0.T. FILES. RtCSMMEND TiTna ems T,FIC4Te as ITA,NBD TO CLARIFY OWNERSN/R / -. /' // iaw \� ry \ 56 �1\ .an \ .an N:- •6.,an _ \ ,\h. 1141 ' / / on \ \� - / . . _ .... \\ \\ �\sa R -5O' i\i� AapAdt _ \•off ` -- I 17 4. .�'/ 100 YEAR FLOOD :21/4•••-•". \� / \ \ 1a ELEV /3.0 {F. �. / \ .gyp \It \ / r Q ......7111;7'-' \\ je ?ssii y`ae..7e --- _ \\ .o' 1 Y \ • 4 \e. Parcel '.1' 2 / 15 ' �0 iw PLAT AOUNDARY mr;::'arransr r +•-saran ^ --'> .::....,aazar anszei a SCALE I I'a40' yD 40 80 Aced ape owtrs4 B0undar7 E MP:W.4PM° Deslsvc?"• sr_ALE JCS NUMBER IRC ENGINEERING Survey- altootorti Pea. DrtANNa maim _ CIVb SNGG C 4EO ED Tx.%r YERL I OATS AI ac LAX= Z VE1 ? Patch E _Coll o. Pans • D9907Tp DATE act sot= tall, 87RSdT City of TlalcrL3 1fA fO h a DC 7100 ►t 10403 For ffiuoa Dots do /.atoc 9 XT 4 a/ 4 APPROKD DOOK to Fe4 ,b 1992 Ptaoe t0e)t7t- t.. L4 4 r "'� � C ATTACHMENT D -2 LOCATION OF RIVER, LOW IMPACT AND HIGH IMPACT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF SIDE CHANNEL FROM OHWM D = Tr-ZE S _ Fo rL c-a "")SS..A p£ P' 3 Z. ►,urn 40 ro-rM_ e -i- 2 " pi A bias 1100 TO-M1.- Fog L- -- t�Sc1F PET-2_1w U2G iz-. -5 S Q' i..a 243 u— D Co J t.... "4 l D a! o •.1 = Mixes /1/41a-nv� 20 uv.o co vcn-- • 5per.ct3 f I�lartv c-c.c c S T1 0 4L vl.l�n Gi4TJ 40 l o0r . Zpo / ' c •-� Prt.opestn wt wpd . ATTACHMENT D -2 eXi0A- T-A-12-ms PM-K C rri OF 71)1=AItLA- CITY OF TUKWILA 4._ 8936 S 99 St S ISO St 31t Rainier Golf & Co Club S 116 St „7-77,1k Fort $. Dent P11-0-3T CT LOCR110 N S't m Tint o st 0 (500' 3000' 6000' . • )0 Y EAR FLOOD Ev. - /a. ( E.m.A.) -op OF BANK BOUNcIA RV •• ck7. Asp ..•••• Fence ▪ o. Toe N '1. -I- .•••• ....• ." ..k. •-...., .....• •••• V. \ I\ ....• `....,..... , s).. ..... .... v ...,-- ••'' ....... .... -... •••• '.... \ ...,.. „.. .......... ..) ../ / K." .■ \ .... , , .•••• -....,. ..........7 T.32 . ....>"-- n.s. \ ••••,,,.... ,cP . --- - ....A - .-'' ,r."N .c. --)-- , Z's --,---,.. \ i.. ...-- '- ,. -. --. ' \ \ 'c' '-- ---'- z----,,,, .... ▪ -- .:.. ' f• .... 7 \ 0 < • ""•- ••• -..,. IA Pa \ \ .....................• •••• r •• -- t.?...7.--...,...... j:is ---- '''' •-• •-••• LINE OF OFIZINA:...5y 14 I CH VIAYET?/ vEco.E.-T /IT o N Li NE X • • ••• ••,. • • •• • • • • • • • : • • High weer line 0, ,.. .c.; ,. ,\°, ..„.. \ - - -----4-- P \ CO \ • 5 . _ ,..• .... N • cAs. \\ 5 \ \ \ t......_. 4b17.52 A \ \ • ......, ...s., ., . \ Cr ................ra.: ... \ ..- \ ...- ) ' x• "_, •••• \ \ ...• ...- f.' ".....___,N. - \ .s. .•,- ' ..- \ \ --- \ f. ,,....'s .r- ..:?;\ \ .... .., ....'" \ .co \ .. ...• ',....., • .., ‘ \ .... .... \ \ 455 ..../......>' .....- \ .... •C .../.. ...• .•••••' .." \ - --121.--. ./')..." Jet.. 1.7. •••• . \ ' ' - ' -'' >'' -'. Ni -e , , , -;'-a-77.21---; \\ ...• 1 .... .../.... ' ..1. ••• \ r .. .......„/. , .L.......... " / ' / • s Guard Roll - .7............./\:c. \ ...k....., .... ...,.....r ......x. Carl ‘.., 'f''... _....„...••• .., ---, -- ..... --• ......110-39.00- , ....... ''' \ ,.• .... ..". __ ‘ --1__ ••1 -- \ ••••• --- — ..-.•••••.. ... "-- \ • .., •'.., \ .... f• .•••• \ / \:•:" •••••• .▪ •••• rc.l PLAT OUND A RY 100 Y EA R FL 001:, EL EV. /3.0 (FE.M.A. : 1212e141-1 O 2D 40 80 • .11.5 TI.4 123'02724 DES/CHD2 SCALE X6 NUMB IR WIN E:TIGINEERINIeTr-5"pdar7 zr.r`P's"211.1c DRA.Ao4c Xt.Ne.ER1 S DRAW Tr HOP. 1- ■ 4..c 9907 CIVII. ENGINMRD,.., ure-. y-A.Der. to rz Pen AND LAND SURVEY= Patch * Cae-tEa r4.:712 ' D99077? 1 T. 04ECXED 241_147 DATE too soma ma ST2 7.,17 City te INI.kvil:-• rA APFRON,C1 DOCX • 2 j.....b y. pbucto ("2.001.72,7 '4 1..7.1.• 2-P.,t2 .."-: 1.3770C"{ 5r,a7 4 OF 4' MD r" '. zr: ACOla. tr. DC4:: ' • . • - .......7-E.S......."."....raZ1=2=• • .. . __L.:. -...r.:-..X.!. Z7.: :7'.. •:7"17:"....L.'T.:=,-V3-tr.M., A B C • US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District ZONE CODIGA FARM HABITAT RESTORATION . w KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON FY 2001 4 PN XXXXXX TY /e1M. and y M. U... * OW.. LL. yob Colo N Li1'..ra or W4NN sN roof�w- Ile. Mlona.�. W .1.1.4I� mow. WM. Nolr -,-. i~ m In Moan y le . *amen. am. N 3 II 11111111 it 11111111111111 111111 '91111 IP' 11111 HUM .1 II REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATC BT B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A BELLINGHAM MT. VERNON PROJE 1 0 POKAN W A S H I N G T O N ELLENS'C PORTLAND O R E G O N O DEPOT O WALLA WALLA POLETON DI VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE DATE AND TINE PLOTTED. 21- MAY -2001 15157 DESIGN FILE. I.\ DESIGNS \M1SC \CIV \C001GA \CODIGGOA.DGN 9 REDUCED TO SOX OF FULL SIZE U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE CORPS OF ENGINEERS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON CODIGA FARMS HABITAT RESTORATION COVER SHEET AND AREA MAP KING COUNTY WASHINGTON sat D ...Una* R Ili p 1■T1'. 0IJUNO1 °� AF OCCT 1 OF 4 PLATT G-1 \ li F t • \4 ▪ 20 .9 i i \ \\ \,.� 11000 PP. x' TALL \\ 20.20 .(X -mk\ A • 19 -TE \ 25.153,N \, `k \ \MDOe TELE"�ILE- ▪ ‘US.... �\• .•� .v 17 e �` ♦` l s.1) to_ .l / '`., EL1Z293.028T • 20 �� <urir •, 53 '\ 11 .s( 11� P a0m��i ALu4 IRON `_ - n�77 tr v h.4 2 �1T.10 ♦`, '`: Q ..... °i ♦'•`. ' \ •�:o \1!F J , ....... 81, a� -7.70 :;✓ r `N.._ \ 17. ��' �Y► • -roil ?1; 16.67•\` ��_ ♦` ♦IQ .57 O2 v+►: l` X07 �♦ IS .27 '`.? �2 '4, vax ere , \WATER STANLVr(P- € -+ _.i_a` X27 '�.• ' •109 ♦,♦ Ie :eQ , \•19.12 �"` p� .11,03 s I`ij = %c JuT -7.2 c� • - : 1 E'e -1.1 e 4 -511 ?$p 842;; . '..'Y.,.. \ _o • 4 -7.63 1-6.8]1 .- y f jr - q REMOVE EXISTING k WOOD RAIL FENCE t• ;WOOD PP. JD' TALL • v I STR. LITE "-v 'v ! 25 KVA TRANS. GUY POLE 470E OS 3, Ilk ply 18.19 115 .8Q 252 Hue/TACK ♦. `\ , 1 ♦ti .T4., li If.31 I5.83•,. $44 -3 11.27 i' 19 .22 NOSE &Bf ig m \ 204 18.95\ \_ j rNDOO PP i JO' TALL W.V. CASE TOP a. 2L52 VALVE TOP FL.. l9 l2 21. 98 \ 21 Sc. .7 13.'6 �\ R•3 5 1909 91 B17Sf• A. ''i -'\ l� �1 1e.9T'itr \: i \ 21.469 a31f 9 1!:199 `..I' `j - \ 21.4....0.5 .\ Xs:: 1°3`•s, j 1� 98 2GiW \ `N. 14.17 ! lY•6 14- f `..._...r• `'�fw t o BLOC. i `.. a. Y&Q1 .r .82 2Q^$3•. 19. 14•fe5 - 18.90 16,6! ` 20 27 IS I9,! ',• / %•, I�-I8° 202 I.. 14. f41 !� 20.2 j ti Ib ACALC.RETA on B '. /••'' ..,'" 20 98 19.32 74 .7o 9s \ :. rn ..1816 CAMP • a 1111110\ I C. RETAINING I0 (STORAGE BIM, i e .rt 181:32 AC4 \ 10•.22 21.96 432 220.58 ti 431 Y. Jf 212 O it +t• 1e 1 7 -'z�.•�•3 tt 171;04 I `tl t:t.6 COQ �r•P I `y _ 77(2 tll�lTAN r p I `75�, I I 19 - /f+46� 1II.9S V if % / i`` ,0� �� P -11.144. "TUC \ \Y [` CFBCI N 181903.656 E 1285633 .763 ALUM21.3I5 .30 - 2.952.12 - fRE MICE �I 0028 4 } t A1cE Nom. 181772. 1 ; t E N�85180. 1,E `� \ • 0.03 •� I 1 "41101 1 ' / 94 / / I 1'} .25 mom., r r 112 196 i 11"���' v� sill =i' iasw! //r • I5 • r .: � `�•�;• 4�1 •Y•'" N43°181866 .979 7f \ IS /1.`i.:'••<.%., •�:uvvN,:. >:y;;sw nl E 1285731 .431 REBAR T .2e -2.97 -2.57 -2.69 -2.93 Me re).* y *.,.emote M the l..Nl, fMm.MM1 LLL&nV Coln et Enelnw1. The Inmate r ,tpeN., reel r..e,lr,.1w e.meeeteee or M,temee moor .0.14n eseettleortene - a preterit bower** l� M e'er. r__ _ 17 Prefeeetenel NKI.trM1w 3 DATE AND TIME PLOTTED. 21 -MAY -2001 16.23 DESIGN FILE• I.• DES IGNSWISC \CIV\C0OIDAACDOICS88.DON 2 2014 REVISIONS OESCRIPTION DATE 97' VT NOTES: I. HORIZONTAL CONTROL BASED ON NAD 83/91, WASHINGTON NORTH ZONE 2. VERTICAL CONTROL BASED ON N.G.V.D., 1929 GA., SA., 47 40' 20' 0 r = 40' 11.4 Ft 1•.t Ft 40' 80' - REDUCEDJD 50X_ OF _FULL SIZE _•_ .- U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE CORPS OF ENGINEERS SEATTLE. WASHINGTON CODIGA FARMS HABITAT RESTORATION EXISTING CONDRIONS/DEMOLITION PLAN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON SO( D s,lTer1R, In FOS NO. uro Melt OIJUNOI C -I PWN ° - DAF R' 2OF4 •%, It. ( N \\ \ •-••■■.,...,..N, . 4 \ \ ,,, ›,..- P 6k PATCH si\ , \\ \\ \ AC PARKING UPSPACES) LOT T------------------ 6' WIDE GRAVEL WALKING PATH t I . N 4n '- 1'1 • I CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYP) k. We wale. we. by lee feettle lbeelat atlity berm et DwIneere. Thor Waage ar eitnetwee old rwpatrptlan epalenetkeo of WM.., appear rteen apmelepoben• ar Veen probe. Me*. *PM Ina peeve et inair eepley.nt aa repair., by DI 1110-1-11dy Ir110.11171111.046,01•••■ 4 1 DATE AND TINE PLOTTED. 21-MAY-2001 16.14 DESIGN FILE. I • \DESIGNS \MISCNCIV COOIGA CODICS0A. DON 2 STIA301. Z COPE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION DATE BY 40' 20' 0 14 n *V 1-4 1-4 40' 80' - REDucEDjo:50X.!;or:FIIIrsIZEr. . • U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE CORPS OF ENGINEERS SEATTLE, WASHNGTON CODIGA FARMS HABITAT RESTORATION SITE PLAN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON SRL MITATICal PIN loam 0 IJLB401 RATE C-2 1,1912b wET 3 OF 4 3a 20 0 10 0 0 `'1 -10 -20 INVERT EL 4' EXITING GROUND SURFACE T 1 f '�- EVCAVATION T CHANNEL •I BOTTOM .1 NATIVE PLANTINGS EXISTING GROUND SURFACE Q I ANNEL ALIGNMENT OHW I \ - 12' GRAVEL LAYER 1 1 CV • P) V Station CHANNEL #1- PROFILE NOT TO SCALES VERTICAL EXAGGERATION=2X WETLAND PLANTINGS LARGE C18" MAX) ROCKS SPACED EVERY 20' TO BREAK UP FLOW 8' CHANNEL WIDTH BENCH EL. 4' 1' LAYER OF TOPSOIL ANGLE OF REPOSE SUITABLE FILL. MATERIAL ROCKS TO ANCHOR LWD LARGE WOODY DEBRIS BURIED IN BANK CHANNEL SECTION - TYPICAL NOT TO SCALE TN. o..l... N- N Ronol b N. S...N. 01.w140 ILL Cons of E'*� . Or N..N� .. a .$ wow. , nI.ww.. �olon� e.dg.T.a."of .n..w.. moor N Now . MS.orN - re... To a IIRm .r RANA .O .. I of - Elevation 25 20 10 0 -5 t 0 INVERT EL I' CHANNEL *2 REVISIONS SYMBOL ZONE INVERT EL -2' EXISTING GROUND SURFACE EVCAVATtON BOTTOM O 0 Station CHANNEL #2- PROFILE NOT TO SCALES VERTICAL EXAGGERATION =2X NOTES: OESCAIPTION DATE BY Q0 CV + + N N MATCH CHANNEL * 1 INVERT ELEVATION 1. CHANNEL INVERT ELEVATIONS ARE MEASURED TO _ REDUCED TO 50X OF FU U. SIZE TOP OF: GRAVEL LAYER DATE AND TIME PLOTTED. 21- MAY -2081 16.33:. DESIGN FILE. I.\ DESIGNS \11ISC \CIV\COOI6A \030I008A.OGN 2 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE, CORPS OF ENGINEERS SEATTLE, WASHNGTON CODIGA FARMS HABITAT RESTORATION awl. DETAILS I KING COUNTY WASHINGTON ROTATION In D Mt NM ANT:. OIJUNOI IYTA C -3 OAR. PIN 40F4 CITY OF TUKWILA PARKS & RECREATION CITE( OFFICIALS Bruce Fletcher Director of Parks and Recreation Rick Still Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Robeit Eaton Project Manager KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CODIGA PARK VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1:1000 DRAWING INDEX: GO - Cover Sheet C1 - General Notes and Legend C2 - Demo & TESC C3 - Paving & grading L1 - Irrigation Plan L2 - Irrigation Details L3 - Landscape Plan L4 - Layout Plan L5 - Landscape Details L6 - Landscape Details L7 - Landscape Details L8 - Shoreline Cross Sections LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SLA Landscape Architecture, LLC ERIK J. SWEET, ASLA, RLA 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 CIVIL ENGINEER Pyramid Engineers 29015 Military Road S Federal Way, WA Attn: Don Bergstrom P (253) 852 -1164 SURVEYOR Parametrix 750 Sith St Sumner, WA, 98033 Attn: Dave Ironmonger P (253) 863 -5128 CODIGA PARK RE 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 Drawhg: COVER SHEET Date: Jab 0 Scala Design: Drawn: Ni8R008 2007. 8 Nis gjsw gJsw a,edc &+sw Revisions. 5-12-2008 2.2 -2008 3.12 -2009 GO gRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES approved 1. The erosion prevention and sediment control (ESC) measures on the apP plans are minimum requirements. 2. Before beginning any construction activities, establish the clearing limits, install construction entrance, and install erosion prevention and sediment control measures. 3. Before any ground disturbance occurs, all downstream erosion prevention and sediment control measures (ESC) must be constructed and in operation. Install and maintain all ESC measures according to the ESC plan. 4. ESC measures. including all perimeter controls, shall remain in place until final site construction is completed and permanent stabilization is established. 5. ars tote sp provide and permanent mesue to protect disturbed areas un ore for seven days or more. 6. From October 1 through April 30, provide temporary and permanent cover measures to protect disturbed areas that will remain unworked for two days or more. In addition to cover measures, the Contractor shall: a. Protect stockpiles and steep cut and fill slopes if unworked for more than 12 hours. b. Stockpile, on site, enough cover materials to cover all disturbed areas. c. By October 8. seed all areas that will remain unworked during the wet season (October 1 through April 30). Mulch all seeded areas. 7. Failure to maintain ESC measures in occordance with the approved maintenance schedule may result in the work being performed at the direction of the Director and assessed as a lien against the property where such focilities are located. 8. During the life of the project, the Permittee shall maintain in good condition and promptly repair, restore, or replace all grade surfaces; wolfs, drains, dams, structures, vegetation, erosion and sediment control measures, and other protective devices in accordance with approved plans. 9. The Perrnittee shall monitor the downstream drainage features, and shall, with the Director's approval, remove all sediment deposition resulting from project related work. 10. All work performed shall be per approved plans and specifications only. The Permittee is required to maintain a set of approved plans and specifications and associated permits on the job site. Work shall be performed in accordance with all federal, state, and local lows. 11. As the first order of business, the Perrnittee shall install erosion prevention and sediment control measures per the ESC and shall install the downstream temporary ESC measures before any site disturbance occurs. Before the temporary measures are removed, install and establish the upstream permanent ESC measures. 12. The Permittee shall of all times protect sensitive areas, their buffers, and od acent private properties and public rights -of -way or easements from damoge during grading operations. The Permittee shall restore, to the standards buffers, and public and private the permit, properties and improvements vement d maged by 13. Permittee shall arrange for and comply with the following: a. Notify the Public Works Department within 48 hours following installation of ESC measures. b. Obtain permission in writing from the Public Works Department prior to modifying the ESC plan. c. Maintain all rood drainoge systems, storm water drainage systems. control measures and other facilities as identified in the ESC plan. d. Repair any siltation or erosion damages to adjoining properties and drainage facilities. e. Inspect according to the approved ESC inspection schedule and make needed repairs immediately. STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 1. All methods and materials shall meet City of Tukwila Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards, and the current King County Surface Water Design Manual, unless otherwise approved. 2. Mark all storm drain inlets with Dump No Waste and Drains to Streams'. 3. Drivewoy culverts shall be of sufficient length to provide a minimum 3:1 slope from the edge of the driveway to the bottom of the ditch. Culverts shall hove beveled end sections that match the side slope. OONSTRUCTiON 1. All work performed shall be per approved plans and specifications only. The Permittee is required to maintain a set of approved plans, specifications, and associated permits on the job site. Work shall be performed in accordance with all federal, state, and local lows. Permittee shall apply for o Revision for any work not according to the approved plans. 2. Permittee /Contractor shall arrange o preconstruction conference with the City's Inspector(s) prior to beginning any work. 3. Work in Roadways a. All work in roadways shall meet TMC 11 and the following: b. Prior to any activity in City right -of -way, the Permittee shall provide the City a traffic control plan for review and approval. The traffic control plan shall include the location. address and description of troffic flow during the work and shall meet MUTCD requirements. c. All work requiring lane closures must be by permit only. From the third Thursday in November to the following January 2nd. the Director does not allow lane closures in the Tukwila Urban Center. d. Ftre, pedestrian, and vehicular access to buildings shall be maintained at all times. except when Pernittee has permission from the building owner and the Director to close an access. e. All roadways shall be kept free of dirt and debris using street sweepers. Use of water trucks for cleaning roadways requires preapproval from the Director. f. Install steal plates over any trench, at any time work is stopped and the trench is left open. GENERAL NOTES 1. Any surface improvements which must be removed in order to complete the work shown no additional o these plans the owner regardless of whether orUnotsisuche emoival is shown on this plan. 2. Unless otherwise noted, all demolition materials shall be disposed of offsite of a suitable facility. 3. Stripping materials shall be disposed of offsite in an approved disposal location. This disposal work shall be verified with the Owner and /cr Landscape Architect. 4. Contractor shall protect existing surface facilities (i.e. gas valves, fiber optic vaults, etc.) in all construction areas. Contractor shall also protect underground utilities to remain. 5. Protect trees outside of clearing limits. 6. Site contractor shall provide subgrode within 6' of finish grade in landscaped areas. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE The construction sequence will be as follows: 1. Attend pre- construction conference with City of Tukwila prior to starting any work 2, flag ell oleoriag 1 ^^Its 3. Install silt fence in all locations shown on the TESC ?fans. 4. Install temporary construction entrance. 5. Clear, grub and strip all areas within the clearing limits. 6. Mass grade site. 7. Fine grade site and install crushed surfacing top course and pave. 8. Landscape site, hydroseed and install amenities as shown on landscape plans. 9. All erosion control focilities shall amain in place until the site soils have been stabilized. 10. Contractor to remove TESC focilities when so directed by the City of Tukwila. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION NOTES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT ONE -CALL (1-800 - 424 -5555) FOR UTIUTY LOCATIONS C01.1TACTS PROJECT MANAGER: DESIGN ENGINEER: OWNER: ROBERT EATON. TUKwILA PARKS AND RECREATION (206) 396 -2566 DONALD RICK STILL, TAU WILA, PARKS AND RECREATION TON (206)576 234464 GENERAL 1. LOCATORS SHOWN FOR UIUTIES ARE APPROXIMATE 2. AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING PROJECT SITE WORK. NOTIFY THE UTIUTIES INSPECTOR AT 206- 433 -0179. 3. REQUEST A PUBLIC WORKS UTILITY INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CAUJNG 206- 433 -0179. 4. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES SOLE RESPONSBIUTY FOR WORKER SAFETY, AND DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. _ AND A S. CURRENT COPY OF CITY CF TUKWILA DEVELOOPMENT GU�IDEUNES AND DESIGN AND CONS UCTON STANDARDS AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE 6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THESE APPROVE DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS REQUIRE PRE- APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER THE ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF TUKW11A 7. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, UNU3S OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PUBUC WORKS CITY OF 1UKVALA DIRECTOR. 8 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CURRENT SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS ON -SITE 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS PRIOR 10 PROJECT FINAL APPROVAL 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STREET MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION. IL ALL SURVEYING FOR PUBLIC FACO.ITIES STALL BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTOR OF A WASHINGTON UCENSED LAND SURVEYOR VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE NAVD 1988. HORIZONTAL DATUM SHALL BE WASHINGTON STATE (GRID) COORDINATES. NORTH ZONE. USNG NAD 83/91 SURVEY CONTROL AND TED TO ANY TWO CITY OF TUKWILA HORIZONTAL CONTROL MONUMENTS. FOR PROJECTS WITHIN A FLOOD CONTROL ZONE. THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE CONVERSION CALCULATIONS TO NGVD 1929. 12. REPLACE OR RELOCATE ALL 9GNS DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTOR. 13. RETNN. REPLACE OR RESTORE DOTING VEGETATION IN RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS. AND ACCESS TRACTS. LEGEN D EXISTING 20' FIR, 20' OP T W - 25 -- 2 PARAMETRIX CONTROL REBAR AND CAP PARAYETRI% CONTROL P8 MILANO FL SHEP CATCH BASIN SAN. SEWER MANHOLE SAN. SEWER STUB MARKER UNUTY POLE SERVICE / GUY POLE U ILRY P011 WIH UGHI GUY ANCHOR TELEPHONE MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER WATER VALVE IRRIGATION VALVE B0% IRRIGATION SPRINKLER HEAD SIGN BOLLARD CONIFER TREE, DIAMETER, TYPE AND DRIP UNE AS NOTE OVERHEAD POWER UNE Until1Es PER LOCATOR PAINT MARKS BURIED MCI CABLE WATER MAIN PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR FILTER FABRIC FENCE DITCH FLDYAJNE SIGN Qs MiLy 27.4 FLOW ARROW CONSTRUCTION EN1RANCE REMIND tams DETAIL NUMBER DETAL CALLDUT SHEET INI RE DETAIL IS LOCATED SPOT ELEVATIONS EXTRUDED CEMENT CONCRETE CURB M11W MEAN HIGH WATER UNE AND OFFSETS PLANNING APPROVED • No changes can be made to these plans Without approval from the Planning Division 3f DCD Approved By Date 615- l Zoog 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 Drawing: GENERAL NOTES AND LEGEND Date: 2008.02-02 Job* DS&EC'040 Sosle A�awauN Desigtr oyVB Drain Mt- Check EC Revisbnsc Sheet C -1. of 3 -.W NW= bona r T 933 N 182325 , E 1285051 N 182380 c,6 E 1285164 CONCRETE EXTRUDED R8� \ I I 6' MAX. JOINTS IN FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS. USE STAPLES, WIRE RINGS, OR EQUIVALENT TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS. 2'x2' BY 14 Ga. WIRE OR EQUNALENT. IF STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC USED ��MINWUM 4'1,4' TRENCH 1°G ALO►0 R = 25' MIN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE PAVED TO THE EDGE OF R-O -W PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO AVOID DAMAGING OF THE ROADWAY R IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ENTRANCE BE CROWNED SO THAT RUNOFF DRAINS OFF THE PAD 0ST SPACING MAY BE INCREASED 7 ' IF WIRE BACKING S USED NOTE: /11.3: FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ANG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE SOIL OR 3/4' -1.5' WASHED GRAVEL. INSPECTOR MAY APPROVE ALTERNATE BACKFILL MATERIAL 2'x4' WOOD POSTS, STEEL FENCE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUIVALENT (\FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOT TO SCALE INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVERT PER DESIGN ON SHEET C -3 4' -8' OUARRY SPACES GEOTEXTILE N 182289 E 1285060 __ 20= y,1= L$P48Q= E PMX SEE SU \ NO 12' MIN. THICKNESS o\\ s\ o\ FULL D 'TH SAWCUT 1' FROM EDGE OF EXISTING PHALT PAVEMENT. REFER TO SHEEY \C3 FOR LOCATION. CB /70100 \ GRATE 25.32 \ SSMH 110101 RW 26.02 N 18 \�\\ E TA52 INSERT SSMH RIM 2 10096 115 5 C8 INSERT C 31 15 30 1"=30' N 1821 12 B /10094 PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS /EGRESS AREA (\STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2 NOT TO SCALE =UK 1. REFER ID LANDSCAPE PLµS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING CLEARING. GRUBBING, TREE PROTECTION, STRIPPING AND 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FAIRE A UTILITY LOCATE COMPANY PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY EXCAVATION ON SITE 3. DPROVEMENIS INCLUDE. IS Nor UNITED TO POWER, COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES TO REMAIN. 4. THE CRY OF TUKWILA RECENTLY INSTALLED AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF 50TH PLACE SOUTH AS SHOWN. PROTECT INFILTRATION SYSTEM FROM DAMAGE CLEANOUTS AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE RIMS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FLASH GRADE. 5. A TEMPORARY 6' MN CHAIN UNK FENCE, POSTS AT MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 10' 0 /C. SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIP UNE AROUND TREES TO REMAIN. FENCE SHALL COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE TREES INSTALL POSTS USING PIER 6100(5 ONLY. WORK WITHIN PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE DONE MANUALLY. NO SfOCIO'1LING OF MATERIALS, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. OR STORAGE OF EOUIPYENF,SMALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF FENCING. 1. HORIZONTAL +�+ CONTROL CATUM: WASHINGTON STATE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83/91 DERIVED FROM WSRN GLOBAL POMON91G SYSTEM WITH TIES TO WSDOT CONTROL POINT NC17 -1 FOUND 3 1/2' BRASS DISK AT THE TOP CENTER OF 1.4 WIDE CONCRETE WALK LOCATED AT 111E NW. CORNER OF BOEING ACCESS ROAD BRIDGE OVER 1-5. N 188625.82 E 179'4195.58 ELEV. 51.42 2. VERTICAL DATUM NAVD 88 DERIVED FROM WSRN GLOBAL POSIDDNING SYSTEM W1111 TIES TO WSDGT CONTROL POINT HC17 -1 BENCH MARK: WSDO1 HC17 -1 (SEE DESCRIPTION PER HORIZONTAL CONTROL DATUM NOTE ABOVE) ELEV. 51.42 3. PARAMEIRIX SURVEY CONTROL MX 8000 SET 1/2' REHAR AND PARAMETRIC CONTROL CAP ON SOUTHERLY SIDE OF 5016 PLACE S AND LOCATED 5.2' SE OF FIRE HYDRANT AND 7.7' 5W. OF WATER VALVE 6 182293.13 E 1285214.70 ELEV. 25.17 P10C 9001 SET PK NAIL AND FLAMER ON NORTHERLY SIDE OF 507H PLACE S. AND LOCATED 1.0' SOUTHERLY OF EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND 9.3' SE OF UTILITY POLE N 182101.94 E 1285445.68 ELEV. 25.60 4. METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: THE CONTROL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A TRIMBLE 5800 AND THE WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH A LEICA TOTAL STATION. 0 Z °ICJ W ° i Z� t5.5o ° n THE TOPOGRAPIOC SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY STANDARD TRAVERSE METHODS USING A LEICA TOTAL STATION. 5. THIS T'OPORRAR9C SURVEY ODES N REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY PARAMEIR9L INC. AND DOES N PURPORT TO SHOW ANY OR ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SEDIMENT TRAP OUTLET 'TECT INFILTRATION (SEE NOTE 4) CLEARIN LIMITS ( ) 1 SILT FENCE (TYP) 1 m L 1 N 18206 1 E 128526 ACTOR SHALL PROTECT TREES TO REMAIN. REFER TO NOTE #5. PLIX 9001 SEE SURVEY NOTE /3 1 MIN. OVERFLOW 1 YIN. 3.5' -5' 1' YIN. 1.5' MIN. WAX. ELEV = 20.5 FAT BOTTOM 3/4' -1.5' \ 2 - -4• ROCK RIPRAP WASHED GRAVEL GEOTEXTILE DISCHARGE TO STABILIZED CONVEYANCE. OUTLET OR LEVEL SPREADER CONCRETE EXTRUDED q.CURB NOTE: TRAP MAY BE FORMED BY BERM OR BY PARTIAL OR COMPLETE EXCAVATION MIN. SURFACE AREA AT ELEV. 24.0 = 400 SF MIN. SURFACE AREA AT MIN. BOTTOM ELEV. 20.5 = 4 SF FULL DEPTH SAWCUT 1' FROM EDGE OF EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT. REFER TO SHEET C3 FOR LOCATION. 1 , 1 ' 1 $mac titiy 1 A ,tier N 128519 -_ E 128529@ SEDIMENT TRAP 19'182007 \� E 1285'364 ) < \�4. \\W■Ilk �5. `Via• CRETE EXTRUDED EDGE OF . 6585427 NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED BACKFIU. GEOTEX 1 °SEDIMENT TRAP 3 NOT TO SCALE 6' YIN. 1' MIN. DEPTH OVERFLOW SPILLWAY 11�111 1Tr11 1111 II- ' ' ' - •'� •'�,� MIN. 1' DEPTH r��- J-74' 2' -4' ROCK LL MIN. 1' DEPTH 3/4' -1.5' WASHED GRAVEL ELEV = 25.0 71: ��71= �7I:=�71:= 11`= 1raira':If =1F11" N 181915 E 1285427 \ 1 1 1 1H ®SEDIMENT TRAP OUTLET 4 NOT TO SCALE CATCH BASIN GRATE N 181 E 1285440 -- fir- - N 181877 1818]3 - - E:T285557 N 181893 SOUD WALLS FILTER MEDIA FOR DEWATERING NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ANY INSERT IS ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN. 0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE. THE MEANS TO DEWATER THE STORED SEDIMENT, AN OVERFLOW. AND N BE EASILY MAINTAINED. 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 DEMOLITION AND TESC Date 21KI90 dp Job 9 TKCF-07.01 ate:' AS s1Mt1WN Destm P68 Dram OVJB C11edc POG Redd= _1285645 POROUS BOTTOM E 12859.15 N 181837 E 1285487 t3 P'30Sd FACE OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT 3- OPEN- GRADED ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE 2. 0.s- CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE 6' MINIMUM 1.s- TO 3- CRUSHED ROCK FILTER FABRIC EXISTING SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95X OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 1 I NA NOTE OPOROUS ASPHALT PAVING SECTION NOT TO SCALE PARKING INSET MINT H015RRB PMX - ----------- __ SEE SU NOT �� '13ECTRICAL � CONDUIT CON�tNM ;iWC71 cnaN - NOTES: AVAaATAE FROM IEM1D =NOME FRm„CIS a UIVTT VMLT m OBUMPER CURB NOT TO SCALE vAN ACHE SSMH #10101 RIM 26.02 SAWCUT o \ N =182204.83 `� \ E =1285288.00 0 \\ MATCH EXISTING ;\ ASPHALT PAVEMENT "4. \ CB #10100 \\ GRATE 25.32 \\ R =12' \ RADIUS PT O N =182164.06 \ E- 17Ra"L' 87 \ SSMH\ #10096 SA • RIM 2 15 N =1" 72.67 \ E= 13.60 1 CB #10095 GRATE 2�y.31 RT 56 98 .47 1. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIDEWALK LAYOUT, SIDEW*U( CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION AND PERMANENT PLANTING POUT.. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A UTIU1Y LOCATE COMPANY PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH MIY EXCAVATION ON SITE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL DIETING MPROVEMENTS ON SITE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS MAY INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO POWER. COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES TO REMAIN. 4. PARKING LOT AND HANOMJAP STALL STRIPING SMALL FOLLOW WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION. 5. TRAFFIC SIGN MATERIAL, WORIOIANSHIP AND INSTALLATION SHALL FOLLOW THE WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION MID THE MUTCD. 8. PROVIDE AND INSTALL 2- ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, H NDHOLE, WIRING AND JUNCTION BOXES REWIRED FOR COMPLETE OPERATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLLER VERIFY POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLLER AND COORDINATE WORK WITH LOCH. ELECTRICAL COMPANY. ALL INSTALLATION AND MATERIALS SHALL FOLLOW FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL DECIMAL CODES. 7. &.L PAVE ENTT MARKINGS SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC W500T HYPE A OR TYPE 8 PER SECTION 9-34 OF THE WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. LATEST EDITION. 8. TAIL OF NORTHWEST TRAFFIC ARROW SHALL BE LOCATED 25' FROM THE EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE 11P OF SOUTHEAST TRAFFIC ARROW SHALL LOCATED AT 25' FROM THE EXISTING ROAD CENIERUNE 9. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 10. APPROXIMATELY 350 CY OF ORGANIC MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. APPROXMIATELY THE SAME VOLUME OF CRUSHED ROCK AND ASPHALT WILL BE REQUIRED ID CONSTRUCT THE DRIVEWAYS AND PARIONG AREA 1 CB #10094 4' SQUARE ACCESS PARKING SPACE SYMBOL SHALL BE WHITE THERMOPLASTIC. GRID SHOWN IS FOR LAYOUT PURPOSES ONLY. WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH WSDOT SECTIONS 8 -22 & 9 -34. METAL POST NOTES: 1. METAL POST TO BE GALVANIZED. ALL BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS AND SCREWS MUST BE GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS. 5/16" X 1 -1/2" BOLTS. 2. FOOTING SHALL BE AT LEAST 30- DEEP, 2' IN DIAMETER AND BACKFILLED USING 5/8" ANGULAR CRUSHED ROCK. 3. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL FOLLOW WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). 4. MOUNT PRIMARY SIGNS SO THERE IS SEVEN FEET FROM THE GROUND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN. MOUNT SECONDARY SIGNS ON 111E SAME POST SO THERE IS AT LEAST SIX FEET FROM THE GROUND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN. 0 I' - 8• 0 TM to MARKING AREA 8.03 SOFT. SEE D 50 IF STORM D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SAWCUT N =182064.27 E =1285447.81 PMX 9001 SEE SURVEY NOTE #3 6. ALL PRIMARY SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED IN THE SAME MANNER. INCLUDING THE SAME TYPE OF POST AND FOOTING. OHANDICAP SYMBOL AND SIGN NOT TO SCALE DO NOT ENTER SIGN MUTCO R5-1 - 30" X 30- CONCRETE EXTRUD D 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 CURB RADIUS PT 0 N =182052.48 8 =1285452.36 REFER ALSO To NOTE 18 THIS SHEET N =182049.01 8 =1285486.07 MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2' ,BAD • PT O '\ N182 23 -J 8`X,47 �- \ N 1B20 830 1285484.2t".•c \SOU WITCO `R1 -1 - 24- : C 1 1 111\ �' `,\�r~•' I �e V� \l %WRB BUMPERS tn'P) 4' MADE STRIPES. ip'`'`\' `' - - - - -- \-_fit =\ \�, �----------- J DICAPBOL __ ��-- TYPE IS TRAFFIC ARROW OTHERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW WSDOT STANDARD PLAN F- 10.42 -00 NOT TO SCALE W I1AN01 TALL-M4 CCESS �'ASl£ SHALLi� OT .MORE I -N -18201 _ - _ THA4.21L 1T4•At-DIREC310t4. \ 1_- E =1285393 ue\ �` \ 4\ ,\4 N =182038. \2,38 =1285408.59 1E -23.18 .�R lsz5480. E 29548 1 57 26. Q EXTRUDED ` „SEE DETAIL ..TRAFFIC ARRO NOTE JOINTS MAY BE FORMED D OARa43 NSTALLAIOI =RIO A NOD DIVIDER OR SARLVT AFTER CONCRETE °TES TOHJNNIW STRENGTH. APPRmNIAIELY 4QO LA (NOUDN0 CAPS) OF EXTRUDED CIRB 6 BEADED. ALL EXTRUDED CURB ENDS WALL FE SEAL RASED. 10• z I/2 , 5• , 2 I/Y DxawRq PAVING AND GRADING OCEME4 NT CONCRETE EXTRUDED CURB WSDOT STANDARD PLAN F- 10.42 -00 NOT TO SCALE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE CATALOG NUMBER SYMBOL @ A A ,800 -12 NPR DESCRIPTION HUNTER 1- 2O—ADV ROTORS ■ collore MON ELECTRIC VALVE SCH 40 CLASS 200 VALVE SCHEDULE sHRUe BEy - - — LAWN POP UPS ull0111. 1116111110111111 - 111011110111111 LAWN POP UPs PAR10NG �D- °�� - 1161111111121111 WIIIIISargilli BIRD 1800 SERIES 12' RADIUS RAINBIRD 1800 SERIES 12' RADIUS RAIN ES 10. RADIUS BIRD TBOO SEiB RAIN 8. RADIUS RAD 4® 30 e AINBIRD 1800 SERIES CONTROL aEC'08C VALVES R PEDST RAINBIRD TES REMOTE 10' TROLLER W STAINLESS RAINBIRD ESPY TER TO BE USED IN PROJECT RAINED G QUICK COUPLER ABLY RED —WAI 440C VALVE PORATION BALL VALVES RFD— �, 9ZE VMITE AS SHOWN SOLVENT WELD PVC MAN S S AS SHOWN SOLVENT WELD P vc LATERAL LL ATE a 1 REGISTERED AR mo. ERIK J. CERTIFICATE 90 ay! 1 PEDESTAL CONTROLLER THRUST N AND.>,`TE,RAL LINE BEDDING "CF GENERAL NOTES SHALL BE NETAF DRIP ZONED AS PER ACHES WHERE POSSIBLE. AND S 2 1. ALL SHRUB AREAS TURF PIPES SHALL pMMON P1P N0 �t A IN NATURE. AND MINIMUM OVERSPRAY' INSTALLATION 4 3. ADJUST SPRAY CONTRACTOR S FOR>�DE NIROLLER. AND INST ONTRGTOTOR TOPROVIDEIRRIGATION TO moaat,LO1-,A71ON_ F POLE E MOUNTED coscurt 4. IRRIGATOR R PROVIDE OWNER AND INSTALL A HOOK UP. SUe R RESP`OOt4SIB R PSE FOR 5 GENERAL CO FO IN oe ec e TOP CONTRACTOR SHALL SET PERMIT DSC NEp AL D AND WIRED BY ELECTRICAL IN ELECTRICAL Pwp4AE SUTRIC ALL HARD `, O wO PROVIDE AND IN NTS' pwMBINO NS ASPHALT, R TO PROVIDE ANDOt AA11ND ANY REQUIRED R HARD SURFACE ILRFFACES. SUCH AS ASPHALT. CONCRETE LOEAnse ALL. C DISCREPANCIES. D PRIVATE UTnlTIES ON SITE FOR IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR PUBU P, THE CONTRACTOR ION. NOTIFY LELANDSCAPE ARCHRECT OF U APPROPRIATE SAFETY RECUTATIONS� PRIOR T CONSTRUCTION. SHALL COMPLY WIHT ALL A�i� e. CONTRACTOR FOR PIPE SIZE � TED SCHEDULE INDICATED BE- SUBN1T SHOP DRAWINGS SUGGESTED LANDSCAPE RgRCNHIITEC�T ALL AAPPPROVAL INSTALLATION. LABEL. Dore of pROOGUTIO"• ""° 1, CONTRACTOR FOR WITH 200 PVC, Z AIyLATERN -EWES SHALL BE CLASS CLASS OF PIPS SCHEDULE 3. ALL Rinse TO BE PVC 4. ALL THREADED FITTINGS SHALL BE TAPED WITH ON TAPE 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 p (ats) 786 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 REMOTE CONTROL N PLAN PVC O,GPM r PVC 3-4 &13GPM 1112 PVC GPM 24-33 1 1R' . PVC 31.48 GPM 2 1 PVC 450 GPM 2? PVC 880. 110 GPM 3' PVC Date: 41188 1 ,bb # 1) scale: t+TL Design: F nW i Drawn: F� I�� Chetic F 3121 08 RBVisbns =Mote �I 3-12.2009 Sheet L1 ELECTRIC VALVE POINT OF PEDESTAL CONTROLLER O,y, TERAL UNE BEDDING ti EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CATALOG NUMBER DESCRIPTION PSI RAD O• ® n 1- 20-ADV HUNTER 1- 20-ADV ROTORS 30 VAR • - 1800-12 MPR RAINBIRO 1800 SERIES 12' RADIUS 30 12' O e • 1800 -12 MPR RNNBIRD 1800 SERIES 12' RADIUS 30 12' e • • 1800 -10 MPR RAINBIRD 1800 SERIES 10 RADIUS 30 10' • 1800 -8 MPR RAINBIRD 1800 SERIES 8' RADIUS 30 8' 0 150 - PGA RAINBIRD IGP REMOTE CONTROL. ELECTRIC VALVES © ESP -16 RAINBIRD ESP ELECTRIC CONTROLLER W/ STAINLESS PEDETAU ® SHRUB BED - PARKING EISIWG WATER METER TO BE USED IN PROJECT ® 44-QC RAINBIRD 440C QUICK COUPLER ASSEMBLY C>-4 1' RED -WHITE VALVE CORPORATION BALL VALVES . ' SCI 40 SOLVENT WELD PVC MAIUNE. SIZE AS SHOWN 27.0 CLASS 200 SOLVENT WELD PVC LATERAL LINE. SZE AS SHOWN 1' 30.6 LAWN ROTORS 13 1' 29.2 SHRUB BED - S VALVE SCHEDULE VALVE NO. SIZE GPM DESCRIPTION 1 1 1/2' 44.4 SHRUB 8ED - NORTH 2 1' 13.8 LAWN ROTORS 3 1' 32.4 LAWN POP UPS 4 1' 38.0 LAWN POP UPS 5 1' 14.4 LAWN POP UPS 5 1' 25.9 LAWN - SWALE 7 1' 25.9 LAWN - SWALE 1' 33.3 SHRUB BED - PARKING 9 1' 29.2 LAWN POP UPS 10 1' 30.3 LAWN POP UPS 11 1' 27.0 SHRUB BED -SW 12 1' 30.6 LAWN ROTORS 13 1' 29.2 SHRUB BED - S 14 1' 30.5 SHRUB BED - 5 15 1' 30.5 FRONTAGE SHRUB BED 16 1' 30.5 FRONTAGE SHRUB BED GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL BE NETARM DRIP ZONED AS PER PLAN. 2. ALL PIPING IS DLAGRANATIC IN NATURE. PIPES SHALL SHARE TRENCHES WHERE POSSIBLE. AND SEPERATE COMMON PIPING BY 8' MINIMUM. 3. ADJUST SPRAY PATERNS FOR MAXIMUM COVERAGE AND MINIMUM OVERSPRAY. 4. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION CLOCK/CONTROLLER, AND INSTALLATION REMOTE CONTROL VALVE • 5. GENERAL CONTRCTOR TO PROVIDE ANO INSTALL ALL CONDUIT TO CLOCK LOCATION FROM POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMER COORDINATE W!TH OWNER AND PSE FOR HOOK UP. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT FOR CONNECTION TOPOWER. CONTRACTOR SHALL SET SUB PANEL FOR POWER IN ADJACENT STAINLESS STEEEL PEDESTAL MOUNT 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POWER SOURCE FOR CLOCK AND WIRED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR PER ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. 7. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL REQUIRED PLUMBING SLEEVESUNDER ALL HARD SURFACES, SUCH AS ASPHALT, CONCRETE SIDEWALKS, AND ANY OTHER HARD SURFACE. 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL PUBLIC UTIUTIES AND PRIVATE UTWflES ON SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ALL DISCREPANCIES. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WNT ALL APPUCABLE CODES AND APPROPRIATE SAFETY REGULATIONS. SUGGESTED SCHEDULE FOR PIPE SIZE 1. CONTRACTOR TO SIZE ALL LATERAL PIPES PER VOLUMES INDICATED BELOW. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. ALL LATERAL ONES SHALL BE CLASS 200 PVC, WITH MANUFACTURERS LABEL, DATE OF PROOCUTION. MID CLASS OF PIPE 3. ALL FITTING TO BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 4. ALL THREADED FITTINGS SHALL BE TAPED WITH TEFLON TAPE IRRIGATI N PLAN SCALE: 1' = 30'.O 0 5 15 30 60 Be PVC 0-5GPM 7 PVC 6.13GPM 1 1X4' PVC 1443 GPM 1 1/7 PVC 24-33 GPM r PVC 34.48 GPM 212' PVC 4580 GPM 3'PVC BO -110 GPM PLANNING APPROVED No changes can be made to these plans without approval from the Planning Division 3f DCD Approved Br Date: 5/5/ 7 RECEIVED 'RAR 25 Ina Cow. DEYeaPwce/ CODIGA PARK 8825 SE 164th St enton, WA 98058 (425) 766 -9535 (425) 793-4276 Dewing: IRRIGATION PLAN Date: 4nerzoo8 Job 9 Z007-48 Slate: NTB Design* PSW Drawn' 5JSW Chedl: PJSVV RmAsiorm 5X122008 71212009 3-12-2009 L1 r IRRIGATION 1 MAINLINE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE MASTER VALVE QUICK COUPLER r DOUBLE CHECK DEVICE FOR IRRIGATION EXISTING 1' METER WATER MAIN 0 POINT OF CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE (91'.411 QUICK-COUPLER =I (2) STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR CLAMPS 1 -112 DIA STEEL ROD, 30' LENGTH SCR. 40 P.V.C. F1 BOW TrT 1 CU. FT. CONCRETE VAULT W/ GULL WING DOORS 3' COPPER UNE W/ r COMPANION FLANGE (COPPER SWEAT) OR THREADED 3' DCVA, FEBCO B05YD I► GRAVEL SUMP NOTE:: 1. Use Teflon Tape on e0 TMeaded Connections OQUICK COUPLER VALVE NOT TO SCALE 3 FINISH GRADE AMETEK 170108 VALVE BOX OR EQUAL SCH. 90 P.V.C. NIPPLE TAT LENGTH AS REQUIRED SCH. 40 P.V.0 COUPUNG TXT SCH. 80 P.V.C. NIPPLE TxT SCR. 40 MAINLINE FITTING SCH. 80 P.Y.C. NIPPLE (2) SCH. 40 P.V.C. 90 DEGREE STREET ELLS 1B' W X 1? 1)0 17 TM( CONC. THRUST BLOC( 24' W X 12 D X 12' T10( CONC. THRUST BLOC( NDISTURBED TRENCH WALLS, TYP. 1rwx1r0X1rTHK CONC. THRUST BLOCK 17 X12'X12' PRECAST CONC. BLOCK 18' W X 12. D 011 TO( CONC. THRUST BLOCK UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALLS, TYP. OTHRUST BLOCKING NOT TO SCALE G, - 0 DOUBLE CHECK DEVICE NOT TO SCALE AMETEK 12" STANDARD VALVE BOX I r SCLL 40 PVC MAINLINE POPE SUPPORT TYP 1/8' STEEL PLATE FINISH GRADE SET VALVES SIDE BY SIDE AS SHOWN. 5 MAX. PER BOX VALVE CLUSTER PLAN }1 VALVE BOX CARSON CL448 CONCRETE L— SCH. 40 IMMUNE BLOCK, TYP. AS PER PLAN NOTES: 1. USE TEFLON TAPE FOR AU. THREADED PIPE CONNECTIONS. 2. ALL WIRES TO BE INSTALLED AS PER LOCAL CODES. NO 'N -LINE' WIRE SPLICES WILL BE ALLOWED. OCONTROL VALVE CLUSTER NOT TO SCALE FINISH GRADE AMETEK 1r STANDARD VALVE BOX CHAMPION 200 1' RS BRASS ANGLE VALVE. INSTALL AT ALL MAINLNE LOW POINTS TO FACILITATE COMPLETE MAINLINE DRAINAGE. I PVC MALE ADAPTOR 8 LATERAL LINE FINISH GRADE rVALVE BOX (SEE SPECS.) DRAIN GRAVEL 1 CU. FOOT DOUBLE VALVE BOXES NOTES: BOLTED BACK TO BACK 1. USE TEFLON TAPE FOR ALL THREADED PIPE CONNECTIONS. 2. ALL WIRES TO BE INSTALLED AS PER LOCAL CODES. NO 'RUNE' WIRE SPLICES WILL BE ALLOWED. SOH. 80 UNION CENTER VALVE IN BOX SCH. BO NIPPLE SCH. 40 PVC ENT 90 CLASS 200 PVC PIPE CONTROL WIRES SCH. 40 PVC TEE OR 90 ANGLE TO DIRECT LATERAL IN TRENCH SUCH THAT PIPE IS NOT CURVED OR OTHERWISE STRESSED. W OF WASHINGTON REGI LANDSCAPE A� LANDSCAPE ERIK J. CERTIFICATE 740. 658 I OELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE NOT TO SCALE FINISH GRADE TOPSOL VARIES 117 24' SCH. 80 PVC THREADED UNION MAINLINE REDUCING TEE BAND BAdO'LLL MATERIAL 1' CLOSE NIPPLE SCH. 80 P.V.C. IN MAINLINE NOTE USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL TREADED CONNECTIONS FINISH GRADE GATE VALVE NOT TO SCALE 4' P.V.C. NIPPLE '. �I�► 1 —I I I � I i I I .' • ;. fC1l I 1 1 118' :11 LATE UAL LINE 1.: IIIiI ' MAINLINE TNAlWII11111Q— MAINLINE or HIE LATERAL LINE GRAVEL SUMP 2 CUBIC FEET MIN. OF PEA GRAVEL WALK/CURB POP-UP SPRINIQER BODY 1 1 �1 IJJI -1 1 I- RAIN BIRD -1800 PD0 D I -1 11 -1 ( SPRAY HEADS HUNTER -1-20 ROTOR HEADS (3) MARLEX STREET ELLS SCH. 80 P.V.C. NIPPLE (8' MIN.) SCH. 40 P.V.C. TEE NOTES: 1. NIPPLE AND STREET ELL DIAMETERS SHALL EQUAL INLET SIZE SPRAY BODY. 10 POP UP SWING JOINT NOT TO SCALE DOUBLE VALVE BOXES BOLTED BACK TO BACK OMANUAL DRAIN VALVE NOT TO SLUE FINISH GRADE HUNTER 1.70 I 111(11y111J11l1111111 UI111)g!lllllhl1111 18' SQUARE PIECE OF SOD AROUND HEAD IN NEW SEEDED AREAS ONLY TOP SANDITOPSOII. MD( II�II� USE FACTORY ASSEMBLED O RING SWING JOINT SEE SPECS. P SO L.40 P.V.C. TEE 11 ROTOR SWING JOINT NOT TO SCALE El V NOTE WET TRENCHES THOROUGHLY FOLLOWING BACKFTLL PROCEDURE BACICF LL TO PREVENT FUTURE SETTUNG 8 MAIN AND LATERAL LINE BEDDING NOT TO SCALE CONTROL WIRING PLANNING APPROVED No changes ben be made. to these plans without approval from the Planning DNsion of DCD o I6/ �)/ \ \ ■ — — 12 PEDESTAL CONTROLLER NOT TO SCALE IRRIGATION CLOCK 314' POWER CONDUIT: 612E, TYPE, DEPTH PER LOCAI. CODE GROUND WIRE CONDUIT. MIN. 1 1/2'. GROUND PER ASIC GUIDELINES PEDESTAL BASE: CONCRETE OR PREFABRICATED FINISH GRADE CONDUIT FOR CONTROL WIRES as Atm Kg 25Tf WfttgiT 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 IRRIGATION DETAILS I Date: 411871008 I Job # 2807-08 !Scale: NTS Design: gjsw Drawn: F„ ISW Check FJSW Rte. 8/12/1008 2/112008 3-12 -2008 Sheet L2 SHORELINE CROSS HYDROSEED AREA BETW EEN LANDSCAPING BUFFER AND EDGE OF PAVEMENT SECTION B-B' NG LOT SWALE RANTING PARKING LOT SWALE Spry SHEETS FOR PARKING OUT AND ITEMS SHORELINE GROSS SECTION GC 0 TREES - b _ PseudoSueai mezetdi 0 0 0 0 SHRUBS 3 Cane, 6-Ft Ht. B&B. @ 15.Ft O.C. 0- 10'-Ft Ht., 2• Caliper Cad. or B&B 8 -10-Ft Ht 2• Caliper Cad. or B&B 1843-Ft HL, B&B 6-Ft-13-Ft Ht. B&B, igt 10ft O.C: COYPUS serkea 1Ravrremee' 2 gal Cont ® 5-Ft O.C. 2 gal Cont. 5-Ft O.C. Oregon Grape 1 Gal 3-Ft O.C. 1 Gal @ 5-Ft O.C. GROUND COVERS & VINES 41 Cont. Itg 2-Ft O.C.. Straight R. Trtargldar Spacing PARKING AREA SEEDING MIX ESIGN PER ECROSS SECTION D•D Geum macrophyllunn Lege leaved allum HYDROSEEDING Three Way Rye SITE AMENmES Trash Cans - 32 gallon Bench Picnic/Game Tables Srke Rack Ordinary High Water Mad* Supply by Owner Supply by Owner Supply by Owner Supply by Owner Supply by Owner 8 Ibs per 1000 oq8 of area. hydroseeded Contractor shall install concrete pad. end bolt canto pad, see detail Contractor shall Install concrete pad. and bolt bench to pad, see detail Contractor shall Install concrete pad, footing, and table, see detail Contractor shall Install concrete pad, fading. and table. see detail OHWM Provided by City of Tukwila Planning Department NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE LAWN AREAS SHALL BE TILLED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL TOPSOIL SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF 10% ORGANIC COMPOST AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE DELIVERD TO SITE AND INSPECTED BY KEEP PLANT LANDS V CARED FOR PRIOR INS AND T L ATIO CONSTRUCTION KON ARCHTTECT PRIOR 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO EP ALL ANT MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS. 4. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS W01 BE VERIFIED BY CT' LANDSCAPE ARCHTIECT. OR REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO 5. ALL PLANTINGS WILL BE INSPECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHTIECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE ALL TOPSOIL AND ITS PLACEMENT, PREPERATION, AND ALL SEEDING AND PLANTING Pte. CONTRACT. 77, P SHELTER IS TO BE PROVIDED BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BID C 114E INSTALL FOR ALL FOOTINGS. CONCRETE AND SHELTER I 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONCRETE PADS FOR . B1KE RACK T '1 CANS. PICNIC TABLES AND BENCHS ADJACENT TO OVERLOOK DECK. OWNER WILL PROVIDE EOUIPMENT FOR INSTALL I , y • CRETE WITH TEST CYLINDERS PER SPECIFICATIONS. TESTING SHALL BE PAID BY CONTRACTOR AND RESULTS PROVIDED TO AMERICA. 10. PARK NAME SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER 11. HISTORICAL SIGN SHALL BE 12 PLANTS THAT SHALL BE BUILT IN � AREA. SHALL BE FLAGGED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. MOVED BY CITY OF TUIGWLA STAFF. AND RELOCATED WnUIN THE BUFFER WITH APPROVAL BYPERM!NO AGENCY, DCC. 13. NOT HERBICIDES, OR CHEMICAL ON PROJECT. SMAYBE USED ON PROJECT, CCNTACT CITY OF TUICIWIA PARKS STAFF PRIOR TO ANY USE OF HERBICIDES OR E \�I OF 8AA90NC I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ERIK J. SWEET CERTIFICATE 140. 858 CODIGA PARK tDGE O F G EAEFyFER7TER AND ASBHMT�n` %, Aryl - ovER boKecF SHRUB EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE LANDSCAPE P SCALE:,• =30 0• 0 5 15 30 N0 APPROVE Pan be made to these jM ns without approval from the Planntnp DMSIon si DCD RECEIVED 'MR 2521159 TI' 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793-4276 { Drawing: 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN Date: 41162008 Job A 2007-08 Sage: NT8 Design: i:JSW { Drawn: EJSW Check EJSW i RssL" IOn6: 6I1212D08 2/212009 3.122009 sheet L3 " SLOPE SIDEWALK AT TOWARDS ROAD STA OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MK L ST CERIIFICATE NO. 858 CODIGA PARK SLA GARBAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTAU- 4 X 13 CONCRETE PAD FOR BIKE RACK ADJACENT TO SHELTER AREA. LOCATION TO BE CONFINED BY OWNER PICNIC SHELTER FOOTING LAYOUT _4%. • - War, BENCH LAYOUT PLAN ) SCALE: 1 = 30*-0" 0515 30 SD RECEIVED 'HAR 25 111119 COMMUNED omiLopmENT CALL BEFORE y08 DO ND TOLL FREE 1-800-424-3553 11 LANDSCAPE 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766-9535 F (425) 793-4276 Drawing: LANDSCAPE PLAN Data 4,18/2038 Job # 2307-08 Scale: NTS Deakin: Psw Drawn: EJsW Check PSW RBY010113: 5112/2088 2/220D9 3-12-2009 L4 7 MULCH — SAUCER -"`SP-. 44 ICI '17E1 I 1 -1 7 TOPSOIL BACKRLL (SEE SPEC.) MULCH NOTES: 1. SHRUB SHALL BEAR SAME RELATION TO FINISHED GRADE AS IT BORE TO PREVIOUS EXISTING GRADE. TOP OF ROOTBALL SHALL BE 1' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. \%1I/���4 2 1• CfAINAOCK TREE TIES NOTES: 1. FERTILIZE AND WATER AS SPECIFIED FOLLOWING PLANTING. 2. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDmONAL INFORMATION. 3. SEE STAKING 0ETAS. (S). P C5 5LOCK 11 TREE TIE PLANTING HOLE 3XS THE SIZE OF THE DIAMETER FINISHED GRADE REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET FROM ROOTBALL ROTOTILL- COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED w CDSMALL SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE TOPSOIL BAcKFILL (SEE SPEC.) SPREAD ROOTS OF BARE ROOT PLANTS OUT OVER CONE OF HAND-FIRMED TOPSOIL 2 x 2 STAKE AS SPECIFIED. PLACE OUTSIDE ROOTBALL COVER SOIL LOOSENED AREA WITH 7 MULCH. KEEP MULCH 3' FROM TREE TRUNK. 010 THE RANTING PRAT LEAST 3 TIMES THE SIZE OF THE ROOTBALL PLACE TOP OF ROOTBALL 1• ABOVE LEVEL GROWING IN NURSERY COVER SOIL LOOSENED AREA WITH 7 BARK MULCH. KEEP MULCH r AWAY FROM TREE TRUNK. S =1 I —I 1� Ili l 11111 "'I LII i 1_ III 1= I DIG THE PLANTING PRAT LEAST 3 TIMES THE STZE OF THE ROOTBALL STA CC WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCIBTECT CERTIFICATE N0. 858 2 x 2 STAKE AS SPECIFIES RACE OUTSIDE ROOT:A L PLACE ROOTBALL ON SOLID SOIL PLANTING HOLE 3X5 THE SZE OF THE DIAMETER CURB 2 LARGE SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 8' DEPT NEW TOPSOIL AND HYDROSEED TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE EXISTING VEGETATION REFERENCE CML SHEETS FOR GRADING LAWN AREA HYDROSEED MIXTURE NOTES: 1. WATER AS SPECIFIED FOLLOWING PLANTING. 2. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, 3. SEE STAKING DETAIL(S). TOOLED EDGE 3/8• R (TYP.) ROTOTILL COMPACTED SUBGRADE —II1-17—__:=. AS SPECIFIED TOPSOIL BAcXFILL (SEE SPECS.) STAKE TO PENETRATE 17 MIN. BELOW BOTTOM OF RANTING P11 SOIL BACKFILL (SEE SPECS.) I1= I�11E177- DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING with STAKING P401 TO SCALE TROWEL EDGING (TYPICAL AT ALL EDGES 8 JOINTS) REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 12 OF ROOTBALL OEVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE RACE ROOTBALL ON SOLID SOIL MEDIUM BROOM FINISH CONCRETE DUGOUT SLAB CODIGA PARK 6 m Y PAVING COMPACTED SUBGRADE TOPSOIL 4• DEPTH 518• MINUS CRUSHED ROCK COMPACT TO 05% DRY DENSITY 3'8' THICK E XPANS JOINTS (SEE PLANS) 1H' TRICK TOOLED CONTROL JOINT r DEEP WITH 3'r R TOOLED EDGES 4• COMPACTED DEPTH OF CRUSHED ROCK 0oOOO oD0 goDO �oOOgoOOgoO �I- 111_1I�I��iiI -111 i I -111 -1 I I-1 I �l 11=1 11=1 11- 111 8511 COMPACTED SUBGRADE a OLAWN SEEDING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE tee... .\,/itgrrAZIOtws, 4 - ` - - - - TREES SHRUBS 17 MIN DEPTH TOPSOIL GROUND COVER 7 DEPT MULCH CURB ASPHALT PAVING SUBGRADE PARKING LOT SWALE NOT TO SCALE 10 SPLIT RAIL FENCE NOT TO SCALE OCONCRETE PAVING DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 3 TO Sly • ��II II I'Ir -- � ��� -1 I �) �_II FF= -- 95% COMPACTED SUB -GRADE =11— :AF 11 INTERPRETIVE SIGN NOT TO SCALE INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE BY PANNIER GRAPHICS - SIGN FRAME 24X38 FIAT PANEL r DIA SCH. 40 STEEL POSTS WELDED TO STEEL BACK PLATE. POWDER COATED BLACK FINISH GRADE CONOmoN VARIES CONCRETE FOOTING CLASS 5 (TYP) LO REBAR CAGE FOR SIGN POST 0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE PLANNING APPROVED No Changes Can be made. to these Plnn Division of DOD APPICNed BV Date: 5 /I-J1' RECEIVED 11AR 25 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766-9535 F (425) 793-4276 Drawing: LANDSCAPE DETAILS Date: 4116/2008 Jab # Ro01-0e Sete: KTS Dear: EJSW Drawn: E.+SW MIMIC EJSW Rev 3-12 -2009 L5 377 TOTAL LENGTH 7-B 1147 o.c. 7-0 114• 0.C. i C • A lk Q DEDXFDDTING -- CEDAR FASCIA BOARD TYP. 1 X12 ALL SIDES PRESSURE TREATED JOIST 2 X 121? O.C. IIRh BE CoNNECT1oN IN" 1 177 85 314.O.C. JOIST FRAMING LAYOUT i PRESSURE TREATED BEAM 2X12 ALL BEAMS • 5X8 TREATED TIMBER POST LOCK NUTS wINriON STEEL SADDLE BOLTED TO POSTS EXISTING SURFACE SLOPE ODECK FOOTING NOT TO SCALE 03 BAR TO STEEL SADDLE FOOTING 3000 PSI 63 REBAR CAGE AGGREGATE BASE 1 X 12 CEDAR FASCIA 2 X 12 TREATED HEADER BOARD NOT TO SCALE 377 TOTAL LENGTH4 ODECKING LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE TIRE(% X 7 DECKING JOIST FRAMING PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DECKING SHALL BE SECURED TO FRAMING WITH MANUFACTURER RECOMENDED SCREWS. 2. ALL DECKING SHALL BE PROPERLY GAPPED PER MANUFACTUERES RECOMENDATIONS. 3. SUBMIT COLOR OF DECKING TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROC EED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR INSPECTIONS PER CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING CODES. 5. ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PER IBC REQUIREMENTS. a e IJl DECK RANUNG SWEET CER J. NO. 858 X 8 TREX DECKING 2 X 12 TREATED JOIST 17 0.C.TYPICAL ATTACH TO BEAM WITH SIMPSON STRONG TIE JOIST CLIPS AND TIECO NAILS PER CODE 2 X 12 BEAM EACH SIDE BOLTED W/ 11? X 12 STAINLESS BOLT AND TEFLON LOCK OBEAM TO POST CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE PICKETS 4* 0.C. TYP X8 TREK TOP RAIL 2 X 4 TREK SUPPORT :EDAR FASCIA NT 0 b ODECK RAILING NOT TO SCALE 3 X 8 TREX DECKING 2 X 4 TREK SUPPORT 4 X 4 CEDAR POST 6 O.C. Ye x10 STAINLESS BOLT WITH TD LOCK NUTS AND WASHERS N 6 X 8 X 7 TREATED POST PLANNING APPROVED • No plans changes approval from the Planning Division at DCD Apps BY Date: RECEIVED MAR 2 5 mag .T CODIGA PARK LAN O1 S C A P E RCHITE CTUR 16825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 Drawing: LANDSCAPE DETAILS Dale: 4/16/2008 JOb a 2007-08 Scale: MS Design: EJBW Drawn: 5JSW Chedc SJSw Revisions: 5112/2008 3-12 -2009 Sheet L6 24*-0' CENTER OF POST TO CARER OF POST O 7 0 z 30' DIA FOOTING TYP. OSHELTER FOOTING LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE SHELTER FOOTING ERIK •L CERTIFICATE NO. CODIGA PARK O F Egg 3 241' DIAMETER DRILLED SHAFT (F a 3000 PSI) OSHELTER FOOTING NOT TO SCALE TABLE SUPPUED BY OWNER INSTALLATION BY CONTRACTOR MEDIUM BROOM FINISH CONCRETE SLAB OPICNIC TABLE NOT TO SCALE OSHELTER FOOTING NOT TO SCALE O BENCH NOT TO SCALE 3'•P GARBAGE CAN SUPPUED BY OWNER CONTRACTOR INSTALL ON PAD MEDIUM BROOM FINISH CONCRETE SLAB 3B' DIA BY SHELTER ONLY OGARBAGE CAN NOT TO SCALE BASE AGGREGATE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95% PLANNING APPROVED • No changes can be made to these plans without approval from the Planning Division of OCD Approved By:'' Date: 5/4 h oah RECEIVED MAR 2 5 2019 corownary DEVELoRdeir R CHI TE CTUR 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 Drawing: LANDSCAPE I DETAILS Data 41182008 Job # 29070 SwimNTS I Design: Aim Drawn: FJSW Check psw Revisions: Sheet L7 Tort BHMFFl!N ARE. IOT IOWIMPACT a SLIGFFR ROI NO WIWI(TMA APEA_PLNVATF A-AL SHORELINE CROSS SECTION fort I nw IMPACT uu// /u / / / / /u / / /u / / / / / / / / / /uu/uu /uu� &8, SHORELINE CROSS SECTION NTS Art eNOPLINP AREA 100 LOW • FORTINO 61LORELINP SLOPE NO WORK Av BUFFER 11111111111111 Ilnrrrumnm IIIIIIIIIIIIII nruii�ffin 1 PARK RAPROWEMUNT AREA Cam, SHORELINE CROSS SECTION NTS EXISTING 6611PLACF BOUTN iZuu /ZO% -, ✓/// 207/ 7//// / / / / / /u/ / /// //u/uu// //GP' ../J OSHORELINE CROSS SECTION NTS PLANNING APPROVED No changes can be roseate these plena without approval from the Planning Dhrlelon of DCD APpteved By: 90- Da18; Sly /z0759 RECEIVED MAR 25 alg ERIK J. SWEET CER1IF1CATE NQ 858 CODIGA PARK lig RCHI TECTUR 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793 -4276 Drawing: SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS Date: 41182008 Job 0 2007-08 Scale: NTS Design: EJSW Omw EJSW Check EJSW Resisionv L8 /7" CITY OF TUKWILA. PtoaEct VICUJITY MILW Yl- fregariarchl =TAT" a of the cede>s - are dead (out of 6 Eats: 1 Big Lea SHORELINE CROSS SECR ie General Comments: - The big leaf maples are in very veo ,ondltlor.. :he centrac:or should provide proof that the plants that were identified during the initial plant inspection were replaced. mining; Chore is no room ``or it here, but it could be planted somewhere else on site HYDROSEED AREA BETWAFN LANDSCAPING BUFFER AND\ '. EDGE OF PAVEMENT • SHORELINE SECTION MB' NG LOT SWALE PLANTING PARKING LOT SWALE 4 deed anowberry (out of 10 total) SPUR RAIL FENCE N S SEE`Wq JVILL SHEETS FOR PARKING uiff OTLA1tOUT AND RENTS RELINE CROSS SECTION CC' 0 PLANT LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE & SPACING COO. ®O® 0 CI ■ -7�fL- v !Z ,61c 142h / LtAl HISTORICAL SIGN - BCN SCOUT EAGLE PROJECT - DESIGN PER CORPS OF ENGINEERS PLANS PARKING ISLAND SECTION LAWN AREA `V,14)\‘‘ 6 . HISTORICAL SIGN SHALL BE BUILT AS AN EAGLE SCOUT PROJECT AND INSTALLED BY OWNER AND BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA. ' y� 12 ALL RANTS THAT SHALL BE REMOVED IN SLOPE AREA, SHALL BE FLAGGED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MOVED BY CRY OF 'V"/ TUKIWLA STAFF, AND RELOCATED WITHIN THE BUFFER WITH APPROVAL BY PERMmNG AGENCY, DCC. lea 'Mio,.ing (there are 6 out of 0) . 1", 13. NOT HERBICIDES, OR CHEMICAL SPRAYS MAY BE USED ON PROJECT, CONTACT CITY OF IUKWILA PARKS STAFF PRIOR TO ANY ti VV r USE OF HERBICIDES OR PESTICIDES ON PROJECT. '' `� - rt 14. SWALE ARE SHALL BE EXCAVATED TWO FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE AND SEEDED WITH SPECIFIED SEEDING MIX. THIS AREA skiREriNEscRO33 SEC�ON WILL BE COMPLETED BY OWNER AT A LATER DATE AS A RAINGARDEN. tc 0A. cY 1 v�r�c � 1� 1f �5 'F NG BUFFER AND ICI . 5v T. 5 !'SW' T-'-EDGE OEPA-9EMENI - — - Acercbanatum Vine Maple 3 Cane, 6-Ft Ht. BBB, © t5-Ft O.C. 2 gal Cont @ 5-Ft O.C. Acer maaophyfum Big leaf Maple 8' -10' -R HL, 7 Caliper Cont. w B&B - - -- Seed mix, provide specs to landscape architect for appnlvval- - -Cams nutalle Native Dogwood -- - B -10-Ft Ht T Caliper Cont. w B&B Oregon Grape Paeudotsugoa maze's!! Douglas Fir 8-8-Ft Ht., BBB Thula plicate Western Red Cedar 8- Ft -8-Ft HL, BBB, © 10-Ft O.C. - — - Camas stakes Red-Osier Dogwood Seed mix. provide specs to landscape architect for approval 2 gal Cont @ 5-Ft O.C. " -- - Comas serfcee 'Plavfmmes' Yellow Twlg Dogwood Seed mix, provide specs to landscape architect for appnlvval- 2 gal Cant ® 5-Ft O.C. 1 Gal @ 3-Ft O.C. Mahonia aquUdium Oregon Grape Rib/es sangulneum Flowering Current 1 gal Cont (© 5-Ft O.C. Rosa Nutka Nootka Rose ---' 1 gal Cont @ 5' O.C. provide 50% pink 50% white - --- -- - --- Symphodcelpus elbus Srlawberry - - 1 Gal @ 5-Ft O.C. - -- -- - GROUND COVERS B VINES Pagoda chlloensls Beath sfrawbeny 41 Cont © 2-Ft O.C., Straight Row, Triangular Spacing PARKING AREA SEEDING MIX 3 Juncus elusus Soft Rush Seed mix. provide specs to landscape architect for approval 2 Geum macrophyllum - .. - - Carex stepafa Lege leaved allum - -Sawbeak Sedge Seed mix, Provide specs to landscape architect for approval - Seed mix, provide specs to landscape architect for appnlvval- HYDROSEEDING Three Way Rye 8 Ibs per 1000 sgft of area, hydroseeded SITE AMENITIES .. 3 Trash Cans - 32 gallon Bench 2 ...- Piaac/Gamme Tables 1 Bake Rack Supply by Owner - - Supply by Owner Supply by Owner Supply by Owner Contractor shall install concrete pad, end bolt can to pad, see detail Contractor shall Install concrete pad, and bolt bench to pad, see detail. Contractor shall Install concrete pad, footing, and table, see detail Contractor shall Install concrete pad, footing, and table, see detail Ordinary High Water Mark Spilt Rail Cedar fence to be Installed by contractor NOTES: OHWM Provided by City of Tukwila Planning Department 1. ALL LANDSCAPE LAWN AREAS SHALL BE TILLED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL TOPSOIL SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF 10 % ORGANIC COMPOST AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE DELVER!) TO SITE AND INSPECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO KEEP ALL PLANT MATERIALS PROPERLY CARED FOR PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS. 4. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS WILL BE VERIFIED BY CRY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO RANTING. 5. ALL PLANTINGS WILL BE INSPECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTINQ d CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE ALL TOPSOIL AND ITS PLACEMENT, PREPERATION, AND ALL SEEDING AND RANTING IN THEIR CONTRACT. 7. PICNIC SHELTER IS TO BE PROVIDED BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BID THE INSTALL FOR ALL FOOTINGS, CONCRETE PAD, AND SHELTER. S CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONCRETE PADS FOR , BIKE RACK TRASH CANS, PICNIC TABLES AND BENCHS ADJACENT TO OVERLOOK DECK OWNER WILL PROVIDE EQUIPMENT FOR INSTALL 0. CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST ALL CONCRETE WRH TEST CYLINDERS PER SPECIFICATIONS, TESTING SHALL BE PAID BY CONTRACTOR AND RESULTS PROVIDED TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT O. PARK NAME SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER 1 I Y! C'-4 -C' 1e lw SPLLT RAIL FENCE g undeover g aper�p_`jiq� -�, ����led to spec in entire e lB�ech Strarberry =[3+:7artn [�STeen�lcl ee CONCRETtiSIDEW y SHRUB OA, ./ EVERGREEN TREE PANTING DECIDUOUS TREE Vine Naples a planted close Loge her, plan specifies 15 f et on center and they are much closer together. They Iced to be replanted - the a is the room jay nee For correct spacing Co the south. CLAN CAPE P SCALE: 1' = 30' -0a 0 6 15 30 80 rltrawbetr S ogariaaehiloanetel Planted ry- gar .,i C,r4 ly [ CligliC( /J' Lg replace western Red Cedar@ hell are dead)/ T7ggq missing 7 red -osier dogwood (there a only 17 out of 24).♦y , /�� D� {/ \ r• lace 14 flowering cunt. � }'f% /1 2, cWY •�S U , 7, 2 dead doug fi they pl close together . C 1 ao r� fh '/11.1 it Y ►'? missing 6 n >u z r there should be 16 _ oniree[ar J /�}/L� ` 4/ fl I�lt/� should provide proof Chat/ Dlented 1- gallon con •1rse DlanU w- - {'/) c 142 c �• �-r CODIGA PARK 18825 SE 164th St Renton, WA 98058 P (425) 766 -9535 F (425) 793-4276 Drawing: LANDSCAPE PLAN Date: 4)162008 Job# 2007-06 Slate: f(TS Des EJSW Drawn: EJSW Checit PSW Revisions: 512!2008 2ar2oo9 3.12.2009 Sheet L3 6e.