HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2015-12-14 Item 3B - Discussion - Facilities Needs Analysis and Feasibility Study: Facilities Plan Funding OptionsCOUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Ltitials
Meeting Dale
Prepared 'y
ltilappr:r r
12/14/15
BG
Council review
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM No.
CAS NLrN1131:1t:
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON
ORIGINAL A(3ENDA DATE: 12/14/15
is l).� 1 i is 'Trrrl,l: Facilities Needs Analysis and Feasibility Study - Phase 4 Funding and Phasing
Overview
CATEGORY 1 !, Discussion
[1 Motion
❑ Resolution
0 Ordinance
❑ Bid Award
Briefing
❑ Other
• Public Hearing
Ming Date 12/14/15
Mtg Date
lbttg Date
Alts Date
Mtg Date
MMq Dale
Mtg Date
SPONSOR
Si i )NS ( )R':
SvM\I.11ty
Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR
❑ DCD
Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R
Police
This Phase 4 presentation will focus on the funding and phasing options for alternative
facility capital projects.
RI,1'iI:V['f:ll B'1
❑ COW Mtg.
El Utilities Cmte
DATE:
❑ CA &P Cmte
▪ Arts Comm.
❑ F &S Cmte
❑ Parks Comm.
COMMITTEE CHAIR:
❑ Transportation Cmte
❑ Planning Comm..
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SP( )NSOR/ADMIN, Public Works
CoMNIII 'l.i- N/A
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPNNI I'i"UR1: RI:QUIltl i7
$o
AMOUNT BUDGETED
$0
APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0
Fund Source:
Cornnreniv:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
01/13/14
Work Session
04/14/14
Briefing
05/12/14
Work Session
6/2114
Briefing
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
12/14/15
Informational Memorandum dated December 11, 2015
Power Point Presentation
Facilities Study Executive Summary
Facilities Study 23 -Page Summary
*Please bring Draft Facilities Study binders provided under separate cover*
(draft study is available on the Facilities Study webpage)
1 0
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
City Council
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: December 11, 2015
SUBJECT: Facilities Study - Draft Report
Steering Committee Recommendation
ISSUE
Discussion of Steering Committee Recommendation
BACKGROUND
Over the last several years, staff and the consultant team have worked with the Steering
Committee and Council to draft this Facilities Study and provide Steering Committee
Recommendations. We have reached consensus on needs, conditions, and alternatives. We
have nearly completed Phase 4 and will be working to communicate the Steering Committee
recommendations for funding and phasing.
DISCUSSION
This presentation will briefly run through a refresher on the our phases of the study and focus
on the Steering Committee recommendations for alternatives, funding and phasing.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is asking for Council consensus to proceed with community outreach regarding the Steering
Committee recommendation and report back to Council in March 2016.
11
City of Tukwila
Facilities Needs Assessment
and Feasibility Study
Phase 4
Steering Committee Recommendations
December 14, 2015
Committee of the Whole
rocergusimLLEn :ill BERK
ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING STRATEGY n ANALYSIS. COMMUNICATIONS
(07•'
Introduction
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
December 14, 2015
Tonight's Presentation
Process Refresher
Phase 1 Refresher
Phase 2 Refresher
Phase 3 - Steering Committee Recommended
Alternatives
Phase 4
l4Y-
Steering Committee Recommended Funding and
Phasing
Community Outreach and Engagement
What's next?
Process
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
01
Phase One
What are the facilities needs?
■ Identify current use
■ Estimate current space needs
• Project future space needs
Phase Two
How suitable are our current facilities?
■ Inventory existing facilities
• Assess suitability for use
a Assess condition
All Staff Feedback
Phase Three
What's the best plan for Tukwila?
• Identify alternatives (buy, build, lease
Assess alternatives
▪ Identify the preferred approach
Community Outreach and Engagement
Phase Four
How do we get there?
• Phasing and Funding Plan
Staff Feedback
December 14, 2015
3
Phase 1
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
December 14, 2015
Facility Space Needs
Existi
ng
space
2013
needs
2040
needs
•
205,237
f3t-, 567
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000
l4Y-
4
Phase 2
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Assessment of Existing Facilities
rebuild
George Long
Minkler Shop
Fire Stn #54
aUnsuitable condition
December 14, 2015
remodel maintain
City Hall
Golf Maint.
TCC
Suitable condition
5
Phase 3
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
December 14, 2015
Steering Committee Recommended Alternatives
Public Safety Building $25.5 M
Police & Courts combined in a new location.
• 2019 move -in
• 2034 move -in
5 City Shops Facility $26.2 M
Both current shops demolished and new shops combined on a new location
either concurrently with or after the Public Safety Building
• 2019 move -in
• 2036 move -in
° City Hall Campus $18.1 M
6300 to be demolished and City Hall expanded on current
location after move -in to new Public Safety Building.
• 2022 move -in
lD 00 O N d" lD 00 O N d" lD CO 0
c-1 c-1 N N N N N CO CO CO CO m
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N Ni N
/0-
6
Phase 4
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Steering Committee Recommended
Funding and Financing
Fund A. with UTGO (voted) bonds and '',k with 63 -20 financing.
CO
1. Site Selection & Entitlements -
. • ;
public vote
for
PASS
ACCEPT
Issue RFP'
for '
X16
Desi • n & Build -
Design & Permit -
2017 2018
2019
MOVE IN 2020!
Build
MOVE IN 2020!
2020
December 14, 2015
LEGEND
0 Council Decision
Community Input
Construction Phase
2021
2022
MOVE IN 2022!
7
Phase 4
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
December 14, 2015
Recommended Community Outreach
Road Show
TIBAC, COPCAB, Tukwila Rotary, Southcenter Rotary, Southwest King
Chamber of Commerce, Tukwila Historical Society, Equity and Diversity
Commission, Library Advisory Board, Arts Commission, Parks Commission
and Sustain the Pool
Other
Draft Report and Summary on website
Narrated video of Road Show on website and TukTV
TukTV Tukwila, Your Community episode
Reporter — City Pages
E- Hazelnut
Mailing
Open House
Social media
Internal communications
Phase 4
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
December 14, 2015
What's next?
NEXT STEP
TARGET DATE
Council review of Steering Committee December 14, 2015
Recommendations
Public Outreach
January /February 2016
Council Plan Adoption
March 2016
Council Selection of Funding Program March 2016
Pursue Funding Program April 2016
9
Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study
STEERING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Questions?
December 14, 2015
l4Y-
10
City of Tukwila
INVESTING IN TUKWILA
•
•
ESSENTIAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES FACILITIES PLAN 2015 -2040
This Facilities Plan for Essential Government Services provides a roadmap for the City of Tukwila to build
the necessary facilities to ensure long -term financial sustainability, optimize organizational efficiencies, and
maximize public safety. The process was led by a Steering Committee comprised of community volunteers,
City Council members, and City administrators, with architectural and public finance consulting support.
The resulting plan is based on a robust facility needs assessment including an estimate of current and future
facility needs and a defensible assessment of current facility condition and suitability. It includes a
destination, that is, a planning -level description of the City's facilities needs to 2040 as well as potential
funding pathways the City can pursue. The report provides an important knowledge basis and flexible
planning tools to help the City and the community move forward to address the facility needs for essential
government services in a manner that reflects Tukwila's vision and goals.
PHASE 1: FACILITY SPACE NEEDS
Using contemporary space assumptions, Tukwila's current
essential government services need roughly 205,237
square feet of space to support efficient operations.
This includes general office space, shops, fire stations,
and public safety facilities.
Using a conservative estimate of future population and
employment growth, Tukwila is projected to need
235,567 square feet of space by 2040, with the
greatest growth occurring in public safety, fire stations,
and shops.
Current facilities are undersized for current needs, and
projected to be even more undersized in the future.
FIGURE 1: TUKWILA SPACE NEEDS
Existing
space
2013
needs
2040
needs
144,044 sf.
205,237 sf..
235,567 sf.
0 50,000
100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000
PHASE 2: ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING FACILITIES
The City's existing facilities were evaluated by outside experts according to criteria established by the
Steering Committee and staff, and reflecting the priorities set out in the City's Strategic Plan. Based on the
cumulative scores across the criteria the Steering Committee made recommendations on whether the
facilities should be replaced, remodeled, or maintained for continued City use.
FIGURE 2: FACILITY ASSESSMENT OF SUITABILITY RESULTS
Fire Station #51
6300 Building
Fire Station #52
Fire Station #54
Minkler Shop —
George Long
Shop
City Hall
+1
Fire Station #53
Golf
Maintenance
Tukwila
Community Center
Unsuitable condition Suitable condition M
UPDATED: 12/08/15
23
Based on the cumulative scores across the criteria, the Parks and Golf Maintenance building, the Tukwila
Community Center, and Fire Station #53 all had attributes and strengths that outweighed any deficiencies,
making these facilities suitable for maintaining. Both shops (Minkler and George Long), the 6300 Building,
and the other three Fire Stations all had deficiencies that outweighed their attributes, making these
facilities candidates for demolition and replacement. City Hall had both deficiencies and attributes that
balanced one another. The analysis demonstrated a number of significant deficiencies in City Hall's design
and systems, however the high quality of original construction, familiarity of the public with its location, and
the distinctive architectural character led the Committee to recommend City Hall be remodeled rather than
demolished and replaced.
PHASE 3: RECOMMENDATIONS
Alternatives were developed based on the
condition and suitability of existing buildings, a
study of the ideal adjacencies among workgroups,
and additional criteria set forth in discussions with
the public, City Council, the Steering Committee,
and staff. The Steering Committee
recommendations prioritize public safety functions
early in the project phasing and keep City Hall
functions at the existing site. Siting considerations
are recommended to preserve the long -term
ability for expansion. The Steering Committee also
favors a schedule that is as quick as possible,
provided effective managerial oversight and
financial feasibility, to minimize risk associated with
rising construction costs and interest rates
FIGURE 3: PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
1 1 /,
Public Safety Building $25.5 M
Police & Courts combined in a new location.
2019 move -in
Police Precinct $4A M
2034 move -in
City Shops Facility $26.2 M
Both current shops demolished and new shops combined on a new location,
either concurrently with or after the Public Safety Building
■IVI 2019 move -in
City Hall Campus $18.1 M
6300 to be demolished and City Hall expanded on current location after
move -in to new Public Safety Building.
■ 2022 move-in
2036 move -in
LD
N
00
0
N
0
0
N
N
0
N
r1
N
a
N
00
N
0
N
0
m
0
N
m
0
N
0
0
N
0
m
0
N
PHASE 4: FUNDING AND FINANCING
The Plan represents a 25 year strategy for meeting the City's facility needs for essential government
services. The Plan offers funding and financing options, and is flexible enough to accommodate changes in
city services and circumstances. Four funding and financing alternatives were explored for their overall
impact to the City's planned capital facility projects, impact on debt capacity, impacts to rate payers, and
overall costs. The financial analysis demonstrates the need for debt to finance some or all of the major
facility projects, and likely additional revenue generation to cover debt obligations. 63 -20 financing is also
a feasible option for the Public Safety Building or City Shops Facility. The final Plan provides a funding
decision tree to guide the City's implementation of this facilities plan. Staff recommend funding and
financing this Facilities Plan through a mix of UTGO (voted) bonds for the public safety building, 63 -20
financing for the city shops facility, and LTGO (councilmanic) bonds for the City Hall improvements.
FIGURE 4: STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED FUNDING PLAN
Fundy rEth IlFGfi (vetted' hands and with 63-20 flnandri
t_.. 5ite Selection & Entitlements -
24
Zctnmlati4input.
public vote n Hold I - k [hesi n & Build - py tI i Cr--istastrairb Ph
Design .& Permit- ri INAAv *Mt
for
Jd°
°= { I t i Build -
Is>atie RFP'
for
MIw IY
00
m
0
0
0
N
DRAFT: 12 -14 -2015
SUBMITTED TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TUKWILA
INVESTING IN TUKWILA:
ESSENTIAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES FACILITIES PLAN
201 -2040
Rice Fergus Miller
BERK Consulting
25
Led by a Steering Committee comprised of community volunteers,
City Council representatives, and city staff, the City of Tukwila
has conducted a facilities planning process started in 2013. This
document presents the culmination of these efforts in a plan for
ensuring adequate facilities to support essential government
services in Tukwila. The following table presents the next steps in
the process to allow adoption by City Council early in 2016
ARGET DATE
City Council review of Steering December 14, 2015
Committee Recommendations
Public Outreach
City Council Plan Adoption
City Council Selection of Funding
Program
Notify King County of Election
Plans
(if part of Funding Program)
Pursue Funding Program
selected, as per Implementation
Decision Tree
January and February 2016
March 2016
March 2016
April 2016
April 2016
26
INTRODUCTION
The City of Tukwila has undergone many changes over the last 45 years, growing from a
community of 1,800 in 1960 to a municipality serving nearly 20,000 residents and a daily
population of over 100,000 employees and visitors in 2015.
This Facilities Plan for Essential Government Services provides a roadmap for the City to build
the necessary facilities to ensure long -term financial sustainability, optimize organizational
efficiencies, and maximize public safety. Figure 1 presents a high -level overview of the facility
planning process undertaken by the City. The process was led by a Steering Committee
comprised of community volunteers, City Council members, and City administrators, with
architectural and public finance consulting support.
FIGURE 1: TUKWILA FACILITIES PLANNING APPROACH
PHASE ONE
What are the
facilities needs?
• Identify current
use
• Estimate current
space needs
• Project future
space needs
PHASE TWO
How suitable
are our current
facilities?
• Inventory existing
facilities
• Assess suitability
for use
• Assess condition
What's t e:h
plea fig'
T f_kwfta?
• Identify
alternatives (buy,
build, lease)
• Assess
alternatives
• Identify the
preferred
approach
PHASE FOUR
How do we get
there?
• Phasing and
Funding Plan
The resulting plan is based on a robust facility needs assessment including an estimate of current
and future facility needs and a defensible assessment of current facility condition and suitability.
Following the needs assessment, the Steering Committee examined the City's current fiscal
position and explored funding and finance options. This final report includes a destination, that
is, a planning level description of the City's facilities needs to 2040 as well as potential funding
pathways the City can pursue. The report provides an important knowledge basis and flexible
DRAFT I Submitted to City Council December 14, 2015 1
27
INVESTING IN TUKWILA:
ESSENTIAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES FACILITIES PLAN 2015 -2040
planning tools to help the City and the community move forward to address the facility needs
for essential government services in a manner that reflects Tukwila's vision and goals.
PHASE 1: FACILITY SPACE NEEDS
ASSESSING CURRENT NEEDS
In Phase 1, the consulting team assessed the City's current functions and developed predesign
estimates of current facility needs and projected needs thorough 2040. Current space needs
were determined based on nine workgroups established in collaboration with City staff. The
space needs of each workgroup were estimated using one of two approaches:
is The staffing -based approach employs evidence - based, industry standards to
estimate the total square footage, based on the workgroup's staffing.
■ The program -based approach uses program elements to identify facilities that
support similar functions in other jurisdictions, as a reference for estimating the space
needs.
Appendix A provides the detailed analysis of current and future space needs.
Figure 2 presents the total space needs for each workgroup. Based on the City's current
program and services, the City's current (2013 -2014) space needs amount to 205,236 square
feet, assuming updated systems and an optimized layout. This is inclusive of all space needs,
including general office space, fire stations, police functions, and public works (shops). The City
currently supports these essential government functions with 144,044 square feet, much of it not
well designed for its current use and lacking up -to -date systems. The analysis finds that the
City's current facilities are undersized for current needs.
DRAFT I Submitted to City Council December 14, 2015 2
28