HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial 2015-12-14 Item 2E - Agreement - NPDES Phase II Permit: Low Impact Development Gap Analysis and Implementation Update with Otak Inc for $59,006COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
---------------------------- - - - - -- Initial,
Meetin Date Prepared by Mayor's Teview Council review
12/14/15 B
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM NO.
Spec 2.E.
195
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON
ORIGINAL AC.iENDA DATE: 12/14/15
AGENDA ITEm TTTLI NPDES Phase II Permit - Low Impact Development Gap Analysis
Consultant Selection and Agreement with Otak, Inc.
CATEGORY ❑ Discussion
Mtg Date
® Motion
Mt
g Date 12114115
❑ Resolution
Mtg Date
❑ Ordinance
Aft
g Date
❑ BidAxard
Aft Date
❑ Public Hearing
Aft
g Date
❑ Other
Alt Date
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PV
SPONSOR'S As part of the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Phase II
SUMMARY Permit, we are required to review, revise, and make effective local development - related
codes to incorporate and require Low Impact Development (LID) principles and LID Best
Management Practices. Three firms were interviewed and Otak was selected as the firm
that best met the requirements. Council is being asked to approve the contract with Otak
in the amount of $59,006.00.
RI3\7II:WED BY ❑ COW Mtg. ❑ CA &P Cmte ❑ F &S Cmte ® Transportation Cmte
❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
DATE: 12/07/15 COMMITTEE CHAIR: .70E DUFFIE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works Department
COMNIIi TEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Special Consent Agenda
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURI' REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$59,006.00 $50,000.00 $9,006.00
Fund Source: 412 SURFACE WATER (PAGES 84 2015 CIP)
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
12/14/15
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
12/14/15
Informational Memorandum dated 12/04/15
Consultant Selection Matrix
Consultant Agreement, Scope of Work, and Fee
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 12/07/15
195
196
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, P.E., Public Works Director
BY: Greg Villanueva, NPDES Coordinator
DATE: December 4, 2015
SUBJECT: NPDES Phase II - Low Impact Development (LID) Gap Analysis
Project No. 99341210
Consultant Recommendation and Agreement
ISSUE
Approve Otak, Inc. to perform Low Impact Development (LID) Gap Analysis and Implementation
for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Permit.
BACKGROUND
The City's NPDES Phase II permit requires that the City review, revise, and make effective their
local development - related codes, rules, standards, or other enforceable documents to
incorporate and require LID principles and LID Best Management Practices no later than
December 31, 2016.
ANALYSIS
To meet the NPDES Phase II Permit requirements, the City of Tukwila short listed four
consulting firms from the current MRSC Consultant Roster to assist the City with an LID gap
analysis and implementation project. The following three consultants responded with a
statement of qualification and were then interviewed:
1) SvR, Seattle, WA 2) Maul Foster Alongi, Vancouver, WA 3) Otak, Redmond WA
Otak, was selected and is recommended for the contract as they are currently performing
similar work for other cities and were highly recommended.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The LID Gap Analysis consultant agreement is for $59,006, of which $50,000 will be funded by
a Dept of Ecology Water Quality Stormwater Capacity Grant. The Stormwater Capacity Grant
has no City match and the remaining balance will be funded from the NPDES budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve a consultant agreement with Otak, Inc. the amount of
$59,006 for the NPDES Phase II Permit's LID Gap Analysis and Implementation and consider
this item on the Consent Agenda at the December 14, 2015 Special Meeting.
Attachments: Consultant Selection Matrix
Otak, Inc. Consultant Agreement
W:\PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \NPDES Program (99341210)\20152017 Capacity Grant \Otak LID Gap Analysis \Into Memo Otak LID Gap Analysis 12 -04 -15 gl sb.doc 197
2015 LID GAP ANALYSIS
CONSULTANTS O�
P♦
et
5�
�o
UNDERSTANDING OF
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
1
2
3
APPROACH TO MEETING
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
1
1
3
KNOWLEDGEIEXPERIENCE
WITH LID
1
1
3
KNOWLEDGE /EXPERIENCE
WITH DOE SMMWW AND KING
COUNTY SWDM
2
1
3
KNOWLEDGE AND
EXPERIENCE WITH
MUNICIPAL CODES AND
STANDARDS
1
2
3
PROJECT MANAGER AND
TEAM MEMBERS
1
2
3
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING &
PERMITTING EXPERIENCE
2
1
3
EXPERIENCE, PERFORMANCE
& REFERENCES ON SIMILAR
PROJECTS
1
2
3
ABILITY TO MEET SCHEDULE
1
1
1
Totals
11
13
25
Ranking
1
2
3
SCORING SHOULD RANGE FROM 1 (LOWEST RANKING) TO 3 (HIGHEST RANKING).
• e,
200
City of Tukwila Contract Number:
• 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter
referred to as "the City ", and Otak, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in consideration
of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform services in
connection with the project titled Low Impact Development Gap Analysis and
Implementation.
2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies.
3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2016 unless sooner
terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall
commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall
perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later
than December 31, 2016 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City.
4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not
exceed $59,006.00 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the
City.
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of
the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made
to the Consultant in the amount approved.
C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be
made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of
the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City.
D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed,
services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to
complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a
period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon
request.
201
5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other
materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is
executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible
copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with
the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said
documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than
the project specified in this Agreement.
6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by
this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement.
7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or
omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and
damages caused by the sole negligence of the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or
damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant
and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability
hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically
and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's
waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this
indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of
this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from
or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the
agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage
provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at
law or in equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the
types and with the limits described below:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily
injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability
insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage
shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute
form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be
endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage.
W: \PW Eng\PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \NPDES Program (99341210) \2015 2017 Capacity Grant \Otak LID Gap Analysis \Consultant Agreement LID Gap Analysis - sb.doc
Page 2
202
2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability
insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover
liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal
injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the
Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the
work performed for the City.
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of
the State of Washington.
4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and
$1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be
appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they
shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or
insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it.
C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:VII.
D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and
a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant
before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required
by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this
Agreement.
E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any
policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City
may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach,
immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance
and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be
repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due
the Consultant from the City.
9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an
independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services
provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or
otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state
industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to
the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant.
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \NPDES Program (99341210) \2015 2017 Capacity Grant \Otak LID Gap Analysis \Consultant Agreement LID Gap Analysis - sb.doc
Page 3
203
10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the
Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon
or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant,
the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to
deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under
this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national
origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political
affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or
procurement of materials or supplies.
12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this
Agreement without the express written consent of the City.
13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
14. Termination.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10)
days written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant
hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do
so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement
between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses.
15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the
Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws,
regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and
ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is
instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree
that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any
such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action
arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court.
16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared
void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any
other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions
of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the
completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this
Agreement.
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \NPDES Program (99341210)\2015 2017 Capacity Grant \Otak LID Gap Analysis \Consultant Agreement LID Gap Analysis - sb.doc
Page 4
204
17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address:
City Clerk
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda,
represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No
amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in
writing and signed by the parties.
DATED this
CITY OF TUKWILA
Mayor, Jim Haggerton
Attest /Authenticated:
City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty
day of , 20
CONSULTANT
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \NPDES Program (99341210)\2015 2017 Capacity Grant \Otak LID Gap Analysis \Consultant Agreement LID Gap Analysis - sb.doc
Page 5
205
206
Exhibit A
City of Tukwila
LID Gap Analysis and Code Update
Otak Project Number 32634
November 13, 2015
Project Understanding
The City of Tukwila is subject to requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination Systems (NPDES) Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater
Permit (permit), issued by Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology). The current
permit requires the City to update its development codes and standards by 2017 to
make low impact development (LID) the preferred and commonly used approach to site
development.
The required process for meeting the objective of making LID the preferred and
commonly used approach to site development is described in detail in Integrating LID
into Local Codes: A Guidebook for Local Governments, which is referenced by the
permit. This process entails significant municipal staff involvement. This scope of work
describes a collaborative effort between Otak and various City staff to achieve the
requirements of the permit. Generally, Otak plans, leads, coordinates, participates in,
and creates final deliverables for tasks. City staff participates by using their unique
knowledge of local land development standards and practices to give feedback on
Otak's findings, recommendations, and drafts.
The permit- required deadline for updating the City's codes and practices is December
31, 2016.
Task 1: Project Management
Otak will plan, manage, and execute the tasks described in this scope of work in
accordance with the schedule, budget, and quality expectations that are established.
Otak will coordinate regular meetings with the City's project manager and will document
decisions and action items as they arise.
Deliverables
• Coordinate bi- weekly meetings
• Submit monthly progress reports with billings
Assumptions
• Bi- weekly meetings are 30 minutes
Task 2: LID Gap Analysis
Otak will review the City of Tukwila's codes, rules, and standards to identify opportunities
to incorporate LID principles into the City's development codes and standards. Three
principles called out by the City's municipal stormwater permit are:
• Minimize creation of impervious surfaces
• Minimize loss of native vegetation
W:APW ling \PROJI CTS \A - DR Projccts \NPllLS Program ( 99341210) \2015 2017 Capacity Grano \Otak 1.I1) Gap Analysis \Otak Consultant Agreement -
Iixhibit A.docx
207
Scope of Work
Continued
• Minimize stormwater runoff
The gap analysis will review:
• City of Tukwila Public Works Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards
• City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan
• Tukwila Municipal Code, Title 9, Vehicles and Traffic
• Tukwila Municipal Code, Title 11, Right -of -Way Use
• Tukwila Municipal Code, Title 14, Water and Sewers
• Tukwila Municipal Code, Title 17, Subdivision and Plats
• Tukwila Municipal Code, Title 18, Zoning
Otak's analysis will use resources provided in the Department of Ecology's Low Impact
Development Code Integration Toolkit, which was developed specifically for this
purpose. For example, the toolkit describes 12 topic areas that may play a role in
creation of impervious surfaces and loss of native vegetation in local jurisdictions'
development codes. These include, among others, site planning and assessment,
landscaping, parking, and maintenance. Otak will ensure each topic is addressed in the
gap analysis.
In this step, no updates are proposed. Otak's analysis and findings will be further
examined and used as the base of information for completing the project.
Deliverables
• Gap Analysis
Task 3: Gap Review and Opportunity Selection
The Gap Analysis may identify hundreds of opportunities for updating City development
codes and engineering standards to incorporate LID. Otak will need City staff feedback
to narrow down the list of potential updates and approval from City leaders before
beginning to draft the updates.
Task 3.1: City Staff Training and Kickoff
The guidebook emphasizes the importance of City staff participation from various
disciplines. Representatives from key departments with responsibilities for setting and
enforcing the City's land use, engineering, public safety, and critical areas policies will be
selected for participation in the LID code review process.
To bring the team and leaders to a common level of understanding of the principles of
LID and to initiate the review of the Gap Analysis, Otak will host an introduction and
kickoff meeting including team members and leadership.
Deliverables
• Half -day introduction and kickoff
Task 3.2: Gap Review
Otak expects the Gap Analysis to identify potentially hundreds of opportunities for
incorporating LID principles. The analysis will be divided for team review, which will bring
multiple perspectives and specific local knowledge. Team members will closely review
targeted portions of the Gap Analysis, selected based on each team member's subject
1:
Scope of Work
Continued
matter expertise. To facilitate review of specific topics, additional readings are
recommended.
Deliverables
List of additional readings and videos for subject matter experts
Updated Gap Analysis
Assumptions
• One meeting with the whole team will be needed
Task 3.3: Recommendation and Approval
Based on team feedback on the Gap Analysis, Otak will narrow down the list of topics or
codes to update. In this step, no changes will be proposed. Otak will prioritize
opportunities and focus on those topics or code titles that best meet the City's
objectives.
Otak will produce a LID Code Update Findings Report, summarizing the Gap Analysis,
recommending updates, and developing initial concepts recommendation for review and
approval by City leaders. Community Development and Public Works department
directors and others will consider Otak's recommendation and will approve topics or
areas for update in the next task.
Deliverables
• LID Code Update Findings Report
Task 4: Development Code and Standards Update
Otak planners will draft updates of the City's codes and standards to incorporate LID
principles. Otak engineers will draft or update standard plans or details, as necessary.
City staff will continue to be involved as reviewers. The extent of this task is dependent
on the results of the gap analysis and prioritization and selection process above.
Deliverables
• Draft and final development codes
• Draft and final engineering drawings /illustrations
Assumptions
The extent of this task is dependent on the results of the Gap Analysis and prioritization
process in Step 3. For the purposes of the scope of work, we assume:
Update to 5 code titles or chapters, or agreed equivalent, where one title /chapter is
approximately 30 -50 pages (i.e. updates to approximately 250 pages of original
material)
5 new or updated engineering drawings or illustrations, such as standard plans or
details
Task 5: Adoption
This task will include briefing elected officials on LID, presenting proposed revisions, and
following the formal adoption process.
209
Scope of Work
Continued
Our scope includes presentations at several Council Committee meetings, including
Transportation Committee, Community Affairs and Parks Committee, and Utilities
Committee, as well as Planning Commission and a public hearing at City Council.
Deliverables
• One presentation for City Council Committee meetings, Planning Commission, and
the full City Council
• Attendance at up to 3 committee meetings
• Attendance at a Planning Commission work shop
• Attendance at a City Council hearing
Task 6: Public Outreach Support
To encourage community support, Otak recommends the City engage in moderate
public outreach using existing channels of communication and engagement with City
residents, landowners, and business communities.
Otak will support public outreach efforts by developing two brief outreach pieces. Brief
outreach pieces may include a one -page brochure, a newsletter article, one poster
board, or similar item.
Deliverables
• Two brief outreach pieces
Task 7: Summary
The City's municipal stormwater permit requires a summary of the process to be
submitted with the City's 2016 NPDES Annual Report (due March 2017). Otak will
prepare a summary report of the process for submittal. The summary will include a list of
participants; Tukwila's codes, rules and standards reviewed; and a description of the
revisions made to incorporate LID principles. It will be organized to describe:
Measures to minimize impervious surfaces
Measures to minimize loss of native vegetation
Other measures to minimize stormwater runoff
Contingency - Task 8: Implementation
Otak recommends the City develop support tools for staff that will be reviewing and
enforcing new requirements. Implementation includes all those tasks necessary to
prepare City staff for new codes and standards.
Should the City wish to expand the scope of this contract to include implementation,
Otak will assist City departments in developing tools for accepting, reviewing, permitting,
inspecting, and maintaining development proposals and public improvements using new
codes and standards.
Preparation topics could include:
• Updated site plan submittal requirements
• New required site assessments and reports
• Updated road standards
• New types of stormwater facilities
• More flexible review and engineering requirements
210
Scope of Work
Continued
• Additional inspection requirements
• Updated maintenance standards
Otak will work with Community Development and Public Works review staff to develop
tools such as procedures, flow charts, checklists, maps, and cheat sheets for accepting
and reviewing land use and development proposals.
211
212
Vol
� y
X
W
N•
•
G!
U)
c�
`V
I�
HI
.3 M
0 h (1
H
213
0
(co0oCoco0
�z
mo co
co
0
rn
c�
op
�r
co
r
c�
o
cu
r
o 0
GOD
Gp�
tAl ZQI
h � h
00
,
cq
o
0
It
00
co
00
F�
t
0
0
LO
o
00
bA
00
cc
bp
0
00
0
bL Q
W
0
0
2
o
oc
r
0
N
m
CA
�
o
coo
co
a
r.
W
°0
0
0
It
o a
o
0
y
C
cq
00
oL
i
a
o
:z
m
m
o
[C3
N
�
s7
a
Ct
o
A
a
a��laP,
213
214
Transportation Committee Minutes December 7, 2015 - Pape 2
E. Consultant Selection: NPDES Phase II — LID Gap Analysis
Staff is seeking Council approval of a consultant agreement with Otak, Inc. in the amount of $59,006
for the NPDES Phase II Permit's Low Impact Development (LID) Gap Analysis and Implementation.
The City's NPDES Phase II permit requires the City to incorporate and require LID principles and
LID Best Management Practices in its codes and practices by December 31, 2016. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO DECEMBER 14, 2015 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA.
F. Project Completion: Thorndyke Safe Routes to School Project
Staff is seeking Council approval of project completion and release of retainage to Road
Construction Northwest in the amount of $1,116,451.13 for the Thorndyke Elementary Safe Routes
to School Project. This project improved South 1501h Street between Tukwila International Boulevard
and 42nd Avenue South, including new asphalt and pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk, driveway
and curb ramps, and property restoration. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO DECEMBER
14, 2015 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA.
III. SCATBd
Councilmember Hougardy reported that Dana Ralph of the Kent City Council has been elected 2016
Chair.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
Mr. Eustaquio commented on several items, including sewers, claims filed against Sound Transit and a
need for traffic calming on 51 st Avenue South. Staff agreed to follow up and assist with those issues.
Chair Duff ie suggested adding signage to the City Hall driveway entrance along 65th Avenue South.
Meeting adjourned at 6:13 p.m.
Next meeting: TBD
YA14--)�.a Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by LH, Reviewed by GL
215