The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFS 2016-01-20 Item 2A - Discussion - Facilities Plan for Fire Department Annexation OR RetentionTo: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Mayor Ekberg Finance and Safety Committee From: David Cline, City Administrator By: Moira Bradshaw & Bob Giberson Date: January 14, 2016 Subject: Facilities Plan with Fire annexation or Facilities Plan with Fire retention ISSUE Should the City Council proceed with a review of: A. A City Facilities Plan that assumes annexation of the City Fire Department to the Kent RFA, who would be responsible for Tukwila Fire station replacement and other Fire capital costs, OR B. A City Facilities Plan that assumes retention of the City's Fire Department and responsibility for reconstruction of three Tukwila Fire Stations and other Fire capital costs? BACKGROUND The two separate issues have been under review by the City for the past 4 -5 years: — The development of a City Facilities Plan for the long term provision of City services; and — The investigation into annexation to the Kent Regional Fire Authority At the City Council meeting on 12/7/2015, Council directed staff to prepare a schedule for their review of the proposed annexation to the Kent Regional Fire Authority, which includes the Kent RFA rebuilding three Tukwila fire stations. At the Council meeting on 12/14/2015, Council directed staff to include the reconstruction of three of its fire stations into the Facilities Plan as a "Plan B." The two plans conflict and Council direction on which scenario they would like to pursue this year is needed. DISCUSSION Materials to assist the Committee in its review of the two options are attached and a summary is provided below. Timing: The timing of construction completion for facilities is different in the two different scenarios. Attachment A shows the planning, design and construction timing for the Public Safety Building, the Public Works Shop, Fire Stations 51, 52, and 54 and City Hall. Retaining fire means that Fire Station 54 would likely be done earlier than if it were to be done by the Kent RFA; however, the efficiency of combining Station 47 in SeaTac and Station 54 in Tukwila might add more time than scheduled. 1 2 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 Scenarios Comparison Table Attachment B is a list highlighting some of the different outcomes between the two choices. Staff assumed a "cost neutral" position with respect to the City's property tax rate if the voters approved the annexation of fire services to the RFA, which affects the row on "Impacts to Homeowner." A cost neutral option assumes that the City Council adopts the minimum property tax needed to fund the current level of City services, minus Fire operations. Review Schedule: A November election date is targeted for both scenarios as the general election is more likely to have a higher number and greater mix of voters that turnout. Attachment C shows the important review milestones that are needed for each of these two scenarios to get to a November ballot. They are similar but the major difference is that the "Facilities with Retention of Fire" would eliminates the yellow lines and is less work intensive for the Council. Finances: The proposed financing mechanism for Facilities with the City retaining Fire would be to submit a "Public Safety measure to the voters that would include the Public Safety Building as well as the three fire stations. The Funding Scenario worksheets (Attachment D) show the net impact of each proposal on the City's CIP, including the City's debt capacity and the General Fund. An estimated levy rates chart is shown along the top row of each sheet. With the Facilities with Fire Annexation scenario, that chart will need to be revised to reflect the new maximum City property tax rate. There are some costs and capital assurances on the part of the City to the Kent RFA that are part of the proposal for annexation. Those costs are included on the worksheet for Facilities with Fire Annexation to see the long term financial impact on the City's CIP and general fund. RECOMMENDATION The Finance and Safety Committee recommend to the Committee of the Whole a preferred option and proposed review schedule. ATTACHMENT A Facilities Improvement Timing B Scenarios Comparison Table C Review Schedule D Two Funding Scenarios: Plan A - Facilities with Fire annexation and Plan B - Facilities with Fire retention 3 Plan B Facilities Facilities Improvement Timing Attachment A FACILITIES WITH FIRE ANNEXATION SCHEDULE YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 starting 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Plan A PUBLIC SAFETY acilities PUBLIC WORKS CITY HALL RFA STATION 51 STATION 52 FACILITIES WITH FIRE RETENTION SCHEDULE YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Starting 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC WORKS CITY HALL STATION 51 STATION 52 STATION 54 5 Scenarios Comparison Table Attachment B Facilities with Fire Annexation Facilities with Fire Retention Facilities Public Safety Building George Long Shops Minkler Shops Fire Station 51 Fire Station 52 Fire Station 53 Fire Station 54 Voter approved bond; Open in 2019 Voter approved bond; Open in 2019 Combine Shops, 63 -20 Financing (lease to own); Open in 2020 Combine Shops, 63 -20 Financing (lease to own); Open in 2020 RFA fire benefit charge, property tax levy, + fire impact and mitigation fees; Open 2020 RFA fire benefit charge, property tax levy, + fire impact and mitigation fees; Open 2024 Future RFA funding City Hall 6300 Building Police Precinct Fire Apparatus & Equipment RFA fire benefit charge, property tax levy, + fire impact and mitigation fees Open by 2030 Councilmanic bonding Open by 2023 Demolished Future Councilmanic bonding Combine Shops, 63 -20 Financing (lease to own); Open in 2020 Combine Shops, 63 -20 Financing (lease to own); Open in 2020 Voter approved bond, + fire impact fees; Open 2019 Voter approved bond, + fire impact fees; Open by 2020 Future Councilmanic bonding Voter approved bond, + fire impact fees; Open by 2022 Councilmanic bonding; Open by 2023 Demolished Future Councilmanic bonding Heavy duty every 20 years Medium duty every 7 years Heavy duty every 15 years Medium duty every 10 years Financial Impacts Equipment/Apparatus Replacement Capital reserves created by RFA through annual revenue *Replacement of SCBA (Self Contained Breathing Apparatus) and PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) Fire Impact Fees & Tukwila South Agreement $1.1M $4.7M over 20 years + all additional fees Page 1 of 3 20 years of replacement costs covered in voted bond $1.1M Retained by City 7 Scenarios Comparison Table Attachment B *Annual Impact to General Fund & CIP ( *Impact to CIP includes costs shown with *) Impact to Homeowner ($250K) Impact to Businesses Personal Property (typically owned by businesses) LEOFF 1 Retirees Facilities with Fire Annexation $904,000 for 63 -20 lease payments + $3M to $8.5M depending on year ($567 to RFA + $243 for City property tax + $20 - $85 for City voted debt) Total = $830 -$895 Varies; business pay a higher percentage of the FBC than property tax which applies the same rate to all parcels $1.00 per $1,000 AV Firemen's Pension *Personnel costs Facilities with Fire Retention $904,000 for 63 -20 lease payments + $2.2M - $10.1M depending on year ($710 for regular City property tax + $7 - $163 for City voted debt) Total = $717 - $873 Varies but same rate as homeowners $2.84 per $1,000 AV City retains - no change City retains - no change Ctiy retains - no change City retains - no change Up to $160,000 in payments to the RFA for accrued leave for Tukwila employees who retire within first 18 months and up to $20,000 in overtime costs for the first pay period after effective date Retained by City Fire Operations Routine Business Inspections Effective Response Force Emergency Management FD Cares Fire Marshal /Fire Prevention Logistics Maintenance National Accreditation No 15 -17 firefighters Contract with RFA Yes Contract with RFA RFA logistics division RFA provides Maintenance Yes Yes 13 firefighters In -House No In -House Firefighters do logistics Fleet provides maintenance No Outreach Council Meetings Council Workshop E- Hazelnut Multiple Fliers Two, minimum Multiple Articles Developed and handed out at a variety of events Page 2 of 3 Multiple One, minimum Multiple Articles Developed and handed out at a variety of events 9 1 0 Scenarios Comparison Table Attachment B Hazelnut Kid Mail Mailings Online Survey Open Houses Presentations Public Hearing Social Media TSD E- Newsletter TukTV Tukwila Reporter Utility Bill Inserts Website Facilities with Fire Annexation March Edition Twice, minimum Twice, minimum One Four to six Multiple Yes Multiple Posts Twice, minimum Mutliple shows, meeting coverage Multiple Articles Twice, minimum Multiple Posts Facilities with Fire Retention March Edition Twice, minimum Twice, minimum One Four to six Multiple Yes Multiple Posts Twice, minimum Mutliple shows, meeting coverage Multiple Articles Twice, minimum Multiple Posts Timing and Voting King County Elections Deadline Vote Passing minimum Effective Date Future Votes Term August 2, 2016 By April of 2017 50% January 1, 2018 August 2, 2016 November 8, 2016 60% + validation December 1, 2016 Every 6 years the FBC must be approved by 60% N/A Permanent, but revocable by City Council action 20 year plan Note: figures reflected in chart are based on 20 years rather than all years reflected in the Funding Scenarios Page 3 of 3 11 12 Week of February 22 Workshop March 8 Finance and Safety March 14 COW Review Budget impacts of RFA funding and annexation Review draft outreach plan for both Review requested changes to Facilities Plan and draft outreach plan DRAFT Review Schedule Facilities with Fire Annexation OR with Facilities with Fire Retention Assumes a November Election Date Event January 20 Finance and Safety Interim Staff work Week of February 8 Workshop Week of February 15 Workshop Interim Staff work Attachment C Details Review and Choose one of the scenarios Staff refines Facilities plan, compiles responses to questions Review draft Facilities Plan Review Fire operations and facilities Staff refines Facilities plan, compiles response to questions March 28 COW April 25 COW Review Draft Kent RFA Plan and Interlocal Agreement Review revisions to Draft Kent RFA Plan and Interlocal April - June Outreach to residents Includes: • Open houses at fire stations, other locations • Meetings with key groups • Media and social media articles • Mailing to residents • Hazelnut article (mailed to every home and business) • TukTV & website May 23 June 6 June 15 or July 20 Council Public Hearing Council Meeting Kent RFA Board Proposed annexation to Kent RFA Action on annexation resolution Action on Tukwila resolution requesting annexation July 11 Council Public Hearing July 25 COW Interim Staff work On Draft Facilities Plan Deliberation on Draft Facilities Plan Staff refines Facilities Plan, compiles response to further questions August 1 Council meeting Last Council meeting to meet King County Elections' deadline. Resolutions could be passed earlier. August 2 King County Interim Campaign November 8 General Election November 8 General Election White + Green Green +Yellow Facilities Plan with Fire Retention Facilities Plan with Fire Annexation Last day to file a resolution with King County Elections for the November election. Campaign Voters to approve issuance of a fixed amount of bonds and to levy the additional tax to repay the bonds Voters to approve the Kent RFA Plan and annex to the Kent RFA for fire services 13 14 $0 $0 - 1 - 1 - 1 CITY OF TUKWILA FACILITIES PLAN, CONCEPTUAL FUNDING ANALYSIS Plan A - Facilities with Fire Annexation FUNDING SUMMARY otal Facility Costs ($1000s) S ource of Funds 2015$ Public Safety Building $25,861 Police Precinct $4,492 City Shops Facility $26,625 City Shops Addition $3,274 City Hall 518,436 Annexation Costs 56,053 GRAND TOTAL 584,740 Funding Shares YOE$ $28,624 $7,943 $29,492 $6,546 $22,185 $8,139 $102,929 100% UTGO Year 63 -20 LTGO CIP Complete $28,470 $0 $0 $154 2019 50 $7,943 2035 50 $22,856 $6,365 5271 2020 $0 $6,546 2039 50 $0 $19,901 $2,284 2022 $8,139 $28,470 522,856 $26,266 $25,337 28 % 22% 26% 25% Funding Source Impact to CIP KRFA Annexation Costs $2,264 City Shops Addition Cit Sho sFacili Police Precinct MEE $271 8154 50 510,000 520,000 530,000 540,000 OK = Costs are programmed, T = Costs are over programmed, j = Costs are under programmed 200% 180% 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% "Typical CIP" 39% 37% 28% 26% 22% 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 53.00 > 02.so 0 °o 52.00 5180 12 ▪ 51.0o 0 w 50.50 50.00 FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSION DRAFT 1 1-20-2016 v. 1/13/20162:53 PM Estimated Levy Rates Impact to Debt Capacity 2026 • Bond levy rate (UTGO) 120% • General expense levy rate Total Debt Capacity(incl. UTGO) 100/ 60% LTGO Debt Capacity o% 2031 2036 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 PROJECT COSTS 2015$ in thousands PUBLIC SAFETY Public Safety Building Police Precinct PUBLIC WORKS City Shops Facility City Shops Addition CRY HALL FIRE COSTS IF ANNEXED TO KRFA FACILITIES PLAN COSTS Total 2015$ (1000s) Total YOE$ (1000s) Fire Annexation Costs Project Estimate $ 25,861 $4,492 $26,625 93,274 $18,436 $6,053 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 OK $ OK OK OK OK OK $ 150 $ 6,150 9 2,157 $17,404 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $432 $1,000 $3,060 5150 56,000 $2,302 $18,073 $100 51,200 $805 58,581 57,850 - $ 65 $ 813 $ 689 $ 583 $ 376 $ 354 $ 331 $ 300 $ 268 $ 235 $ 200 $ 181 $ 144 $ 123 $ $1,839 $1,434 73 $ 423 $ 473 $ 123 $ 123 $ 123 $ 53 $ - $ - $ - $ $78,687 8300 $12,150 $4,459 $36,677 $905 $8,581 57,850 $0 90 $0 $0 $0 $0 80 $0 $0 $432 $1,000 $0 $3,060 50 $0 $1,839 81,434 80 $94,790 $309 $12,890 $4,872 541,280 51,049 $10,246 59,655 $0 50 50 $0 80 $0 80 $0 50 $714 51,702 $0 $5,527 50 $0 83,630 $2,916 $0 Total 2015$ (1000s) Total TOES (1000s) 96,053 $8,139 50 $0 $65 $69 $813 $888 $689 0776 $583 $675 $376 $449 $354 $435 $331 8419 $300 $391 9268 $360 5235 $325 $200 $285 $181 $266 $144 8218 5123 8192 $73 $117 $423 9699 0473 $806 5123 8216 9123 9223 9123 $229 653 9101 80 $0 80 80 50 90 $0 $0 FINANCING ASSUMPTIONS VOTED UTGO DEBT P216110 Safety Building City Shops Facility City Hall Fire Facilities Fire Station 514 Fire Station 52A Fire Station 54A Apparatus & Equipment Proceeds from bond issue Outstanding UTGO Debt UTGO Debt Service Estimated bond levy rate ($/$1,000 AV) Costs covered by UTGO Bonds $ - $ 6,524.54 $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - 5 - 5 $ - $ $ - 5 2,357.01 $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ 19,588.07 $ - $ - $ _ $ $ _ $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 5 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ - 5 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 928,470 $6,525 92,357 519,588 $6,622 $8,792 $28,363 $27,371 $26,339 $25,267 524,151 $22,991 $21,784 $20,529 $19,224 $17,867 $16,455 $14,987 $487 $663 $2,126 52,126 $2,126 $2,126 $2,126 $2,126 $2,126 $2,126 $2,126 $2,126 $0.08 $0.11 $0.34 $0.33 $0.32 50.31 $0.30 $0.29 50.28 $0.27 $0.26 $0.25 6,525 $ 2,357 $ 19,588 $ $ $2,126 $2,126 $0.24 $ $0.23 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $13,461 $2,126 $0.23 $11,873 $2,126 $0.22 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 5 5 5 5 - 5 $10,221 58,504 $2,126 50.21 $2,126 $0.20 $6,718 $2,126 $0.20 $4,860 $2,126 $0.19 $ 5 5 S 5 $2,929 $1,407 $1,639 $0.14 $ $1,463 $0.12 zPublic Safety Building N V City Shops Facility • Z City Hall re) w Q Value of 63 -20 Lease Base Z Annual Lease Payments LL Costs covered by 63 -20 Lease $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,856 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $22,856 $22,856 $1,846 $ $ $ 2,515 5 20,341 $ - $ $1,846 - $ $1,846 $ $1,846 $1,846 - $ - $ $1,846 $1,846 - $1,846 $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ $1,846 $ - $ $1,846 $1,846 $ $ 5 $1,846 $1,846 $ $ $1,846 $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $1,846 - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $1,846 $1,846 $ - $ - $ $ - $ $1,846 - S - $ $ - $ $1,846 - S CASH FLOW NEEDS AFTER UTGO 8 63 -20 5309 56,434 5888 $2,126 51,724 $10,695 510,090 $419 $391 $360 $325 $285 $266 $218 $192 5117 $1,414 $2,508 $216 $5,749 $229 $101 93,630 $2,916 $0 50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $6,365 $ - $ 6,365 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $19,901 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,246 $ 9,655 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0 Q m W -. 0 0 0 z0 F- 0 0 Public Safety Building Police Precinct City Shops Facility City Shops Addition City Hall Other Facilities Projects Proceeds from bond issue Cumulative Facilities Debt LTGO Debt Service $26,266 $6,365 $10,246 $9,655 $6,244 $6,018 $5,784 $15,940 9475 91,241 $6,461 $475 $475 9475 $25,136 $24,180 $1,962 91,962 $23,185 $22,151 $1,962 91,962 $21,075 $19,956 $18,793 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $17,583 $16,325 $15,016 $13,655 $12,239 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 51,962 0 $ $ $ - 5 $ $ $10,767 $9,236 $7,644 $5,988 $4,741 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,486 $1,486 $3,444 $1,486 $2,096 $1,486 NET FACILITY COST NEEDS $309 $69 $888 $2,126 51,724 $449 $435 $419 $391 $360 $325 5285 $266 $218 $192 $117 51,414 82,508 $216 $5,749 $229 $101 $3,630 $2,916 $0 00 ad 0 0- z U LL 0 Q O W O w 1- 0 U Q F 0- 0 Q Q CL m uU 0 CIP FUNDING IMPACT Facilities capital costs New Facilities LTGO Debt service Facilities Impact on General CIP Budget Existing Debt Service Total Impact to CIP Projected CIP (% of typical planning) Share of typical planned CIP $309 $69 $888 $475 5309 569 51,364 $2,975 $2,977 $2,974 $3,284 $3,046 64,337 100% 100% 100% 13% 11% 16% $2,126 $1,724 $449 5435 $419 5391 $360 $325 $285 $266 5218 $475 $475 $475 $1,241 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 51,962 $2,602 52,200 5924 51,676 52,381 $2,353 52,322 52,286 52,247 92,228 52,179 $2,973 $2,156 52,157 $2,163 $2,156 $1,612 51,094 $1,094 51,094 $1,094 51,093 $5,575 $4,356 53,081 93,839 94,537 53,966 53,416 53,380 $3,341 53,322 $3,273 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 20% 15% 10 %. 12% 14% 12% 10% 10 %. 9% 9% 9% $192 $117 $1,414 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $2,154 $2,079 53,375 $1,093 51,093 51,092 53,246 $3,172 $4,467 100% 100% 100% 8% 8% 11% $2,508 $1,962 54,470 51,092 $5,562 100% 13% $216 $5,749 $1,962 $1,962 52,178 97,711 51,092 $793 93,270 $8,504 100% 100% 7% 19% $229 $101 $3,630 $2,916 $1,962 $1,962 $1,486 $1,486 $1,486 52,191 52,063 55,116 94,402 91,486 51,486 $423 $423 $422 $422 52,614 $2,485 95,539 54,824 81.,486 81,486 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 6% 5% 11% 9% 3% 3% $1,486 NEW LEASE PAYMENTS Lease costs for 63 -20 financing Portion Covered by Enterprise General Fund Budget estimate 63 -20 lease costs as pct of GF Total Impact to Annual Budget ($1000) LTGO DEBT CAPACITY New LTGO Debt (balance outstanding) Existing LTGO Debt (balance outstanding) Total LTGO Debt LTGO Capacity ($thousands) Pct of LTGO capacity used UTGO DEBT CAPACITY New Facilities UTGO Debt (balance outstanding) UTGO Debt Capacity ($thousands) Pct of UTGO Capacity Used TOTAL DEBT CAPACITY ($thousands) Pct of capacity used Pct of capacity not used $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 51,846 $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 50% $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 $923 9129.6 M 8137.5 M 4137.5 M 8141.6 M $145.9 M 8150.2 M 8154.7 M 9159.4 M 8164.2 M 8169.1 M 8174.2 M 9179.4 M 8184.8 M $190.3 M 5196.0 M 9201.9 M 8208.0 M 9214.2 M 9220.6 M 8227.2 M 5234.1 M 5241.1 M 5248.3 M 8255.8 M $263.4 M $271.3 M 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.000 0.0% 8309 069 91,364 $2,602 $3,122 91,847 02,599 $3,304 93,276 $3,245 93,209 $3,170 93,151 $3,102 93,076 $3,002 54,298 $5,393 $3,101 98,634 53,114 $2,985 96,039 $5,325 $1,486 $1,486 $6,461 $6,244 $6,018 $5,784 $15,940 $25,136 $24,180 $23,185 $22,151 $21,075 $19,956 $18,793 $17,583 $16,325 $15,016 $13,655 $12,239 $10,767 $9,236 $7,644 $5,988 $4,741 $3,444 $2,096 $17,704 $15,975 514,187 512,329 $10,396 $9,194 57,946 $6,644 $5,420 $4,697 $4,466 $4,226 $3,976 $3,715 $3,443 53,160 $2,865 $2,558 $2,237 $1,902 01,553 51,189 5809 $413 517,704 $15,975 920,648 918,573 916,415 $14,978 923,886 831,780 929,599 527,882 $26,617 $25,301 $23,932 522,508 $21,026 819,485 $17,881 $16,212 514,476 912,669 $10,789 98,833 96,797 95,154 $3,444 82,096 $81,250 $84,114 $87,079 $90,149 $93,326 $96,616 $100,022 $103,548 $107,198 $110,976 $114,888 $118,938 $123,131 $127,471 $131,964 $136,616 $141,432 $146,417 $151,579 $156,922 $162,453 $168,180 $174,108 $180,245 $186,599 $193,177 22% 19% 24% 21% 18% 16 %. 24% 31% 28% 25% 23 %. 21% 19% 18% 16% 14% 13% 11% 10% 8% 7% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% $6,622 $8,792 $28,363 $27,371 $26,339 $25,267 $24,151 $22,991 $21,784 $20,529 $19,224 $17,867 $16,455 $14,987 $13,461 $11,873 $10,221 $8,504 $6,718 $4,860 $2,929 $1,407 $54,167 $56,076 $58,053 $60,099 $62,218 $64,411 $66,681 $69,032 $71,465 $73,984 $76,592 $79,292 $82,087 $84,981 $87,976 $91,077 $94,288 $97,612 $101,052 $104,615 $108,302 $112,120 $116,072 $120,164 $124,399 $128,784 0% 0% 11% 15% 46% 42% 40% 37% 34% 31% 28% 26% 23% 21% 19% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 3% 1% 0% 0% $135,417 9140,190 $145,132 $150,248 $155,544 5161,027 5166,703 9172,579 $178,663 5184,961 5191,481 $198,230 $205,218 $212,452 5219,941 $227,694 $235,720 $244,029 $252,631 $261,536 9270,755 5280,300 5290,180 $300,409 5310,998 9321,961 13% 11% 19% 18% 29% 26% 30% 33% 30% 28% 25% 23% 21% 19% 17% 15% 13% 12% 10% 8% 6% 5% 3% 2% 1% 1% 87% 89% 81% 82% 71% 74% 70% 67% 70% 72% 75% 77% 79% 81% 83% 85% 87% 88% 90% 92% 94% 95% 97% 98% 99% 99% Plan A Page 7 l6 FINANCING ASSUMPTIONS VOTED UTGO DEBT Public Safety Building City Shops Facility City Hall Fire Facilities Fire Station 51A Fire Station 52A Fire Station 54A Apparatus & Equipment Proceeds from bond issue Outstanding UTGO Debt UTGO Debt Service Estimated bond levy rate (5/51,000 AV) Costs covered by UTGO Bonds $75,615 2 Public Safety Building p V City Shops Facility 1l 2 City Hall r) Q Value of 63 -20 Lease Base 2 Annual Lease Payments LL Costs covered by 63 -20 Lease $22,856 $ - $ 6,524.54 $ 2,357.01 $ 19,588.07 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ 2,607 $ 6,067 $ 6,304 $ 5,111 $ 1,876 $ 6,466 $ 991 $ 1,030 $ 1,070 $ 1,111 $ 1,153 $ 1,197 $ 1,242 $ 1,288 $ 1,336 $ 1,385 $ 1,385 $ 1,788 5 1,841 $ 1,896 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,526 $ $ 1,082 $ 4,953 $ 5 5 1,114 $ 4,922 $ 735 $ 647 $ 5 4,229 $ 5 5 $ 958 $ 882 $ 917 $ - 5 5,513 $ 954 $ $ 991 $ 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 5 - 5 1,030 $ 1,070 5 1,111 5 5 5 - 5 5 1,153 $ 1,197 $ - 5 5 5 5 5 5 1,242 $ 1,288 $ - 5 5 1,336 $ 1,385 $ $ 1,385 $ 5 - 5 5 1,788 $ 5 - 5 5 - 5 5 5 1,841 $ 1,896 $ 5 82,607 512,591 $2,646 $195 $0.03 58,661 $15,338 51,135 $0.20 $24,699 $23,606 $1,782 $0.30 81,876 $47,839 $3,627 $0.58 $6,466 $48,029 $3,767 $0.58 8991 $52,747 $4,250 $0.64 81,030 $51,614 $4,324 $0.63 81,070 81,111 $1,153 $50,400 $49,102 $47,713 $4,401 $0.62 54,481 54,564 $0.61 $0.60 81,197 $1,242 $46,229 $44,643 $1,288 $1,336 $42,950 $41,144 $4,650 54,739 $4,832 $0.59 $0.58 $0.57 $4,928 $0.56 $1,385 $1,385 $39,218 $37,164 55,028 $0.55 $5,131 $0.54 $1,788 $34,926 $5,235 $0.54 81,841 $1,896 $32,903 $30,719 $28,367 $23,855 $19,356 $15,618 $12,378 55,368 $5,506 $5,647 $0.53 $0.53 $0.52 $5,453 $0.49 $4,512 $0.39 $3,865 $0.32 $2,021 $0.16 $10,852 $1,881 $0.15 $ 2,607 $ 13,285 $ 9,161 $ 25,857 $ 2,176 $ 6,766 $ 1,291.37 $ 1,330.11 $ 1,370.01 $ 1,411.11 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ 22,856 $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ 2,515 $ 20,341 $ $22,856 $1,846 - $ $1,846 $1,846 $ - $ 51,846 $1,846 $ - $ $1,846 $1,846 $ - $ $1,846 $1,846 $ - $ $1,846 $1,846 $1,846 $ - $ - $ $1,846 $ $1,846 $ 51,846 $1,846 $ - $ $1,846 $ $1,846 $1,846 $ - $ $1,846 $ CASH FLOW NEEDS AFTER UTGO 8 63 -20 $309 $6,365 -$546 $1,013 $701 $9,888 $9,286 -$380 -5391 -$403 $1,038 $1,069 81,101 $1,134 $1,168 51,204 51,871 $3,490 51,841 $7,423 $0 $0 $3,630 82,916 $0 50 # Public Safety Building Police Precinct City Shops Facility City Shops Addition City Hall Other Facilities Projects Proceeds from bond issue Cumulative Facilities Debt LTGO Debt Service $6,365 $19,901 $26,266 $ - $ - $ 8 - 8 - 8 $ - $ 6,365 $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ 8 - 8 - 8 8 - 8 - $ $ S S $ 0 8 10,246 9,655 S $ 5 8 $ 5 5 8 5 8 8 8 $ $6,365 $6,461 $475 $6,244 $475 $6,018 8475 $10,246 $5,784 8475 $9,655 $15,940 81,241 $25,136 $24,180 91,962 $1,962 $23,185 $22,151 $1,962 $1,962 $21,075 $19,956 $18,793 $17,583 $16,325 91,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $1,962 $15,016 $13,655 $1,962 $1,962 $12,239 $10,767 $1,962 $1,962 $9,236 $1,962 $7,644 $1,962 $5,988 91,486 $4,741 $1,486 $3,444 $1,486 $2,096 $1,486 NET FACILITY COST NEEDS 5309 $0 -$546 $1,013 $701 -5358 -$369 -5380 -$391 -$403 51,038 $1,069 $1,101 $1,134 $1,168 $1,204 $1,871 $3,490 $1,841 $7,423 50 $0 53,630 52,916 80 50 # CITY OF TUKWILA FACILITIES PLAN, CONCEPTUAL FUNDING ANALYSIS Plan B - Facilities With Fire Retention FUNDING SUMMARY Public Safety Building Police Precinct City Shops Facility City Shops Addition City Hall Fire Station 51 Fire Station 52 Fire Station 54 Fire Apparatus and Equipment GRAND TOTAL Funding Shares Total Facility Costs ($1000';; 2015$ YOE$ UTGO $25,861 $28,624 $28,470 $4,492 $7,943 $26,625 $29,492 $0 $3,274 $6,546 $18,436 $22,185 $0 $10,654 $11,400 $11,400 $5,083 $5,657 $4,964 $6,206 $7,329 $6,471 $21,000 $29,060 $24,310 $121,630 $148,237 $75,615 100% 51% Source of Funds Year 63 -20 LTGO CIP Complete $0 $0 $154 2019 $0 $7,943 2035 $22,856 $6,365 $271 2020 $0 $6,546 2039 80 819,901 $2,284 2022 $0 2018 $693 2019 $858 2021 $22,856 $26,266 518,750 15% 18% 13% Funding Source $24,310 54 $858 21 lo 1152 §693 $19,901 $2,284 $271 Oats" 528,470 5154 50 110,00o $20,000 030,000 540,000 OK = Costs are programmed, j = Costs are over program 200% 180% 160% 140% 120% 1000' 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Impact to CIP "Typical CIP" 45% 32% 23% 31% 22% 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 $3.00 0 0 5zsc S N5200 N m 5350 > 51.00 S 50.50 50.00 2016 Estimated Levy Rates 2021 • Bond levy rate (UTGO) • General expense levy rate ■ ■ 2026 2031 2036 2041 120% 1004 80% 60% 40% 20% FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE DISCUSSION DRAFT 1 1 -20 -2016 v. 1/13/20162:53 PM Impact to Debt Capacity Total Debt Capacity(incl. UTGO) 0% 2016 LTGO Debt Cap city 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2015$ in thousands Project Estimate 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 PROJECT COSTS PUBLIC SAFETY Public Safety Building Police Precinct PUBLIC WORKS City Shops Facility City Shops Addition CRY HALL FIRE FACILITIES Station 51 Station 52 Station 53 Station 54 Apparatus 8 Equipment Facilities Plan Costs Total 2015$ (1000s) Total YOE$ (1000s) Fire (No RFA) Costs $ 25,861 $4,492 826,625 $3,274 518,436 $10,654 $5,083 50 56,206 $21,000 OK OK OK OK OK 09 OK OK OK $ 150 $ 6,150 $ 2,157 $17,404 $ - $ - 5 8150 56,000 $2,302 $18,073 $100 $1,481 94,669 $653 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ - 6 $ - 6 - $ - 5 - $ - $ - $ $1,200 5805 $8,581 $7,850 $4,504 $672 $3,758 $762 $827 94,617 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ $ - 5 - $ - $ $432 51,000 $ - $ $3,060 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 S 1,050 $ 1,050 5 1,050 $ 1,050 $ 1,050 $ - $ - 5 $1,839 $1,434 - 5 $78,687 694,790 $300 $12,150 $309 $12,890 84,459 $36,677 8905 $8,581 87,850 $0 $0 60 $0 50 $0 60 $0 $0 $432 61,000 $4,872 $41,280 61,049 810,246 $9,655 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $714 $1,702 $0 53,060 50 $0 $5,527 $0 $0 50 $1,839 53,630 $1,434 $2,916 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total 2015$ (1000s) Tukwila South Fire and Mitigation Fees Remaining Fire Costs 2015$ Total YOE$ (1000s) $42,943 $2,531 56,372 66,226 $4,750 $500 538,193 $2,531 $6,372 $5,726 $47,048 52,607 $6,760 $6,257 65,570 $300 $5,270 85,932 $1,877 $300 $1,577 $1,828 $5,667 $300 $5,367 $6,408 $1,050 $300 $750 $922 $1,050 $300 $750 $950 $1,050 5300 $750 8979 51,050 $300 5750 51,008 $1,050 $300 $750 $1,038 $1,050 $300 $750 51,069 81,050 $300 $750 $1,101 51,050 5300 6750 $1,134 $1,050 $300 $750 51,168 $1,050 $300 $750 $1,204 $1,050 $350 $700 $1,157 81,050 51,050 $1,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 60 $0 51,050 $1,788 51,050 $1,050 $1,841 51,896 $0 80 $0 80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 80 CIP FUNDING IMPACT IMPACT TO CIP & GENERAL FUND Facilities capital costs New Facilities LTGO Debt service Facilities Impact on General CIP Budget Existing Debt Service Total Impact to CIP Projected CIP (% of typical planning) Share of typical planned CIP NEW LEASE PAYMENTS Lease costs for 63 -20 financing Portion Covered by Enterprise General Fund Budget estimate 63 -20 lease costs as pct of GF Total Impact to Annual Budget ($1000) $309 9309 $2,975 53,284 100% 13% $2,977 $2,977 100% 11% ($ (546) $475 ($ (71) $2, 974 $2,903 100% 11% $2,973 64,462 16% 100% 11% 5117 82,274 0872 83,035 51,582 53,737 100% 12% ($ (391) 100% 51,559 62,653 100% 8% 93,031 64,125 100% 12% 53,096 64,189 100% 11% 53,130 84,223 100% $1,962 94,258 100% 53,833 84,925 95,452 $1 092 $6,544 100% 15% 100% 610,178 22% 100% 5% 51,962 $2,384 100% 5% 100% 54,402 84,824 9% 81,486 100% 3% 50% $129.6 M 5145.9 M 0.6% 5923 8154.7 M 0.6% 8164.2 M 0.6% 6169.1 M 0.5% 5174.2 M $1,846 51,846 5190.3 M 0.5% 8196.0 M 0.5% 5201.9 M 8208.0 M 8214.2 M 0.4% 5227.2 M 5234.1 M 9241.1 M 5248.3 M 8255.8 M 8263.4 M 9271.3 M 5309 61,489 92,099 $6,375 54,726 610,308 52,885 92,885 85,325 91,486 CI- 2 CO LLI LTGO DEBT CAPACITY New LTGO Debt (balance outstanding) Existing LTGO Debt (balance outstanding) Total LTGO Debt Pct of LTGO capacity used UTGO DEBT CAPACITY New Facilities UTGO Debt (balance outstanding) UTGO Debt Capacity ($thousands) Pct of UTGO Capacity Used TOTAL DEBT CAPACITY ($thousands) Pct of capacity used Pct of capacity not used 6135,417 13% 87% 515,975 5% 8140,190 13% 520,648 24% $145,132 39% 6150,248 28% 72% 816,415 18% 77% 41% 59% 514,978 16% 39% 61% 523,886 24% $52,747 566,681 79% 5166,703 46% 54% 75% 48% 529,599 28% 45% 55% 66% 42% 526,617 23% 62% 39% 61% 58% 36% 64% 923,932 $123,131 19% 18% 51% $212,452 31% 69% 521,026 16% 72% 14% 43% 5227,694 26% 74% $15,016 517,881 39% 23% 77% 11% 36% 79% 33% 19% 81% 912,669 $104,615 29% 83% 7% 26% 14% 86% 21% 12% 88% 17% 9% 85,154 13% 7% 2% 10% 8310,998 95% 1% 8% 96% Plan 13 Page 10